Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-09-09COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 September 9, 1992 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Assi taut V Secretary Tentatively -Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, September 23rd, at 5:30 p.m. CONSERVATION, RECYCLE - Tuesday, September 29th, at 5:30 p.m. & REUSE COMMITTEE cl�A COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 ELLIS AVENUE P.O. 80X 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8' 17141982-2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetinas September Sep 09, 1992 October Oct 14, 1992 November Nov 11, 1992** December Dec 09, 1992 January Jan 13, 1993 February Feb 10, 1993 March Mar 10, 1993 April Apr 14, 1993 May May 12, 1993 June Jun 09, 1993 July Jul 14, 1993 August Aug 11, 1992 September Sep 08, 1993 Executive Committee Meetinas Sep 23, 1992 Oct 28, 1992 None Scheduled None Scheduled Jan 27, 1993 Feb 24, 1993 Mar 24, 1993 Apr 28, 1993 May 26, 1993 Jun 23, 1993 Jul 28, 1993 None Scheduled Sep 22, 1993 ** Holiday - New meeting date to be determined (Tentatively, November 18, 1992) BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts -31 of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 9, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. P.O. Box 8427 0108" Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2414 AGENDA In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. (6) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel 11 9/09/92 (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - August 12, 1992 regular District 2 - August 12, 1992 regular District 3 - August 12, 1992 regular District 5 - August 12, 1992 regular District 6 - August 12, 1992 regular District 7 - August 12, 1992 regular District 11 - August 12, 1992 regular District 13 - August 12, 1992 regular District 14 - August 12, 1992 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See pages "A" and "B" ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - Joint Working -Capital Fund - Self -Funded Insurance Funds - DISTRICT NO. 1 - DISTRICT NO. 2 - DISTRICT NO. 3 - DISTRICT NO. 5 DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICT NO. 13 DISTRICT NO. 14 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - -2- 8/12/52 $1,003,566.85 2,815,662.45 145,981.49 -0- 595.00 15,165.99 24,773:87 15,583.92 -0- 1,885,011.37 6,691.01 -0- 6,952.04 203.65 3,813.12 170.39 $5,924,171.15 8/26/92 $ 826,685.01 2,679,507.83 157,907.44 101,023.30 46,763.65 178,105.11 27,888.33 165,259.88 26.69 14,984.20 677.18 -0- 430,455.85 3,838.74 -0- 5,430.74 $4,638,553.95 9/09/92 �J 9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(j) All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent, calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase order contract for Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals, Specification No. E-219, for 11 systems, to Golden Star Technology, Inc. for a total amount not to exceed $55,853.00 plus sales tax. See page "C" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Beckman Instruments, Inc. in the amount of $42,966.00 plus sales tax, for Purchase of One Tabletop Optima TL Ultracentrifuge (Specification No. E-220). (c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 12 to the plans and specifications for Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing an addition of $58,714.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for 15 items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 72 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page I' D" 9/09/92 9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 13 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $46,279.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for five items of additional work. See page "E" (e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 13 to the plans and specifications for Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21, authorizing an addition of $15,957.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc., for two items of additional work. See page "F" (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives &t Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, authorizing an addition of $17,689.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper and C. S. Alper Construction Co., Inc., for six items of additional work. See page "G" (g) Consideration of the following actions relative to Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28: (1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said job, changing the,date for receipt of bids from June 9, 1992 to July 7, 1992. (2) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said job, changing the date for receipt of bids from July 7, 1992 to August 4, 1992. (3) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said job, deleting three pump stations; revising requirements; and making miscellaneous technical modifications. (4) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 4 to the plans and specifications for said job, deleting one pump station and making miscellaneous technical modifications. (5) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-126, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for _ said project to Domar Electric, Inc., in the total amount of $374,100.00. See page "H" -4- 9/09/92 9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-127, approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of Wastewater Quality, Diversion and Treatment Study, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $88,055.00. See page "I" DISTRICT 2 (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-128-2, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with Richard Joseph Battaglia, Trustee of the Richard Joseph Battaglia Trust dated February 27, 1986, providing for dedication and granting of new easements necessary for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, at no cost to the District, and quitclaiming the old easement. See page Hill DISTRICT 14 (j) Consideration of motion to receive and file petition from The Irvine Company requesting annexation of 54.52 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of San Joaquin Hills Road and Newport Coast Drive in unincorporated County territory; and consideration of Resolution No. 92-129-14, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (proposed Annexation No. 1 - San Joaquin Hills Road Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 14). See pages "K" and "L" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -5- 9/09/92 ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the meeting held on September 2, 1992 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommeded by said Committee: (c) DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11 Consideration of the following items re introduction of proposed ordinances increasing sanitary sewer service charges to replace Districts' property taxes confiscated by the State: See page "M" (1) verbal report of staff and General Counsel re proposed Ordinances. (2) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 121, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 118: (a) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exemptl pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. (b) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 121 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (c) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 121 and pass to second reading and hearing on September 16, 1992. [ITEM (11) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7] 9/09/92 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 6) (c) (3) DISTRICT 2 �r✓ Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 216, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 210 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 213: (a) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. (b) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 216 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (c) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 216 and pass to second reading and hearing on September 16, 1992. (4) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 319, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 316: (a) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas, of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. (b) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 319 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (c) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 319 and pass to second reading and hearing on September 16, 1992. [ITEM (11) CONTINUED ON PAGE 8] -7- 9/09/92 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 7) (c) (5) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 528, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 525: (a) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. (b) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 528 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (c) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 528 and pass to second reading and hearing on September 16, 1992. (6) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of actions relative to proposed l ; Ordinance No. 622, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending. Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 619: (a) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. (b) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 622 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (c) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 622 and pass to second reading and hearing on September 16, 1992. l [ITEM (11) CONTINUED ON PAGE 91 -8- 9/09/92 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 8) (c) (7) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 729, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 725 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: (a) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. (b) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 729 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (c) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 729 and pass to second reading and hearing on September 16, 1992. (8) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1118, An Ordinance of the Board of `�•�� Directors of County Sanitation District No. it of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1115: (a) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by,the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. (b) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 1118 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (c) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 1118 and pass to second reading and hearing on September 16, 1992. �1 -9- 9/09/92 (11) (d) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing staff to develop and implement a public information program explaining the need to raise Districts' sanitary sewer service charges to recover property taxes confiscated by the State as a result of the action of the Governor and State Legislature that will initially take up to 40% of the Districts' annual property taxes. (12) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. (13) ALL DISTRICTS other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (14) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (15) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn to Wednesday, September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary. (16) DISTRICT 2 Other usiness and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to Wednesday, September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary. -10- 9/09/92 (18) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn to Wednesday, September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary. (20) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn to Wednesday, September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93.sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary. (22) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn to Wednesday, September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of ��..✓ reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary. (24) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25,) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn to Wednesday, September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary. (26) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn to Wednesday, September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary. -11- 9/09/92 (28) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn (30) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (31) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion.to adjourn -12- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE September 9, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. P.O. Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non -routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 9(a): AWARD PURCHASE OF MICROCOMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND ASSOCIATED PERIPHERALS, SPECIFICATION NO. E-219. In 1981, prior to the emergence of personal computers (PCs), the Districts purchased a then state-of-the-art CPT word processing system to provide stand-alone word processing capabilities to begin the implementation of office automation. When originally acquired, the CPT system was utilized by all departments. Over the past few years, most applications have been replaced and supplemented by an extensive network of PCs. The technology upon which the CPT system is based is now antiquated, and spare parts are becoming increasingly difficult to obtain. There is, at present, only one remaining source for these spare parts, and the prices continue to rise. Districts' staff does not possess the skills or parts to be able to maintain these older machines. Finally, the older technology of the CPT system does not allow it to interface with our seven more modern PC system networks (221 work stations) and software. The Districts' Information Services Division has, therefore, recommended that the eleven -station CPT system be replaced. Staff has studied various options during the past year and has suggested replacing each work station with an IBM-compatible PC utilizing the most widely used word processing software application package available, WordPerfect. These systems would be easily maintained by Districts' staff. Spare parts are already being inventoried at the Districts for other computer systems of the same type as that being proposed to replace the CPT system. These systems and their spare parts can be obtained from numerous sources allowing for savings resulting from competitive pricing. September 9, 1992 Information Services has configured the recommended systems to closely approximate the functionality of the CPT system being replaced and expedite the 140-01 transition for remaining staff. All of the new computers will be linked together to an existing file server which presently possesses more than sufficient capacity for the document creation and storage needs of the CPT system being replaced. A total of eleven (11) new systems are needed, together with related peripherals and equipment. These systems will be allocated as follows: Use Quantity General Manager's Secretarial Staff 2 Board Secretary 1 Board Secretarial Staff 2 Director of Engineering's Secretary 1 Engineering Department Planning and Design Secretarial Staff 2 Engineering Department Construction Management Secretarial Staff 3 11 Sealed bids were opened August 25, 1992. Of the thirteen bids received, eleven vendors bid on all seventeen items. Two vendors submitted "no -bid" responses. Staff recommends award of Specification No. E-219, Purchase of Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals, to Golden Star Technology, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, for a total of $55,853.00 plus sales tax. Sufficient funds are budgeted for this acquisition. 9(b): AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE TABLETOP OPTIMA TL ULTRACENTRIFUGE, SPECIFICATION NO. E-220. The Molecular Microbiology Section of the Laboratory is developing and utilizing state-of-the-art techniques that can be widely applied in the detection of indicator or disease -causing microorganisms in treated wastewater and other environmental media samples. Ultra -high-speed centrifugation is an essential step in the final purification of viral samples before they are analyzed. The purification of the samples requires a spinning force that is 100,000 times greater than gravity (100,000 x g). The Laboratory's existing high-speed centrifuge is capable of producing forces of only 20,000 x g. Only an ultracentrifuge has the capability to achieve the centripetal force required to process the virus, bacterial nucleic acid, or protein samples. Beckman Instruments, Inc. is the only vendor who manufacturers an ultracentrifuge which obtains the necessary speed and offers the imbalance -tolerance safety feature. The proposed Beckman tabletop ultracentrifuge produces the force necessary to conduct the work and offers the safety feature of imbalance -tolerance, a recently developed and important feature which protects laboratory personnel. Like the spin cycle in a washing -2- September 9, 1992 machine, if a load imbalance is sensed, the ultracentrifuge shuts itself off rather than wobbling uncontrollably and causing damage or injury. Additionally, this tabletop ultracentrifuge achieves forces of 625,000 x g which can speed the nucleic acid and protein separations. Further, Beckman Instruments is the only manufacturer of a compact tabletop ultracentrifuge requiring 120 volts; consequently, the instrument is easily located. Beckman's price includes finely balanced rotors that are placed in it and the tube sealer required for test tube preparation, installation and shipping, and incorporates the drive in its expanded warranty service agreement. Staff therefore recommends purchase of One Tabletop Optima TL Ultracentrifuge, Specification No. E-220, from Beckman Instruments, Inc., in the amount of $42,966.00, plus sales tax. 9(c): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 TO CENTRAL LABORATORY, CONTRACT NO. J-17. Job No. J-17, Central Laboratory, provides for the construction of a new laboratory, upgrading of the site paving, and provisions for additional parking at a cost of $8 million. Change Order No. 12 is an addition of $58,714.00 and 72 days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for 15 items of additional work. Item 1, in the amount of $1,282.00, is for additional structural support for two air conditioner units. The contract drawings did not show all of the structural steel necessary to support the specified air conditioner units. Item 2 for $1,218.00 provides for the upgrade of exhaust fans EF-1, EF-7, and EF-8 from specified epoxy coated to fiberglass reinforced plastic. The upgrade was recommended due to the corrosive nature of the exhaust. Item 3, in the amount of $1,992.00, is for double studding of radius walls of stairs No. 1 and No. 3. This work is necessary due to a dimensional error between the structural and architectural drawings. Item 4, in the amount of $1,469.00, involves removing and replacing damaged asphalt paving which was located next to a utility excavation through the auto shop parking lot. The previously damaged asphalt paving was not shown to be replaced on the contract drawings as it was not part of the original job. Item 5, for $6,500.00, provides for additional structural supports for the elevator. The added supports were required by the State Elevator Inspector. Item 6, in the amount of $1,279.00, is for sheet metal covers for four air conditioner unit platforms. The covers are necessary to protect against water leakage through the platform into the building. Item 7 is for the recalculation and resurvey of the curb at the sample -drop turnout, at a cost of $956.00. This was due to an error in the curve data on the contract drawings. Item 8, in the amount of $13,140.00 and seven calendar days, is for the furring of walls, columns, and steel posts in eleven rooms and providing a stainless steel cap for sills and ceramic tile for the window jambs of one room. Furring of walls and columns is required for casework to line up, otherwise if would have to be notched around columns. The stainless steel cap and ceramic tile is for reduced maintenance. Item 9, a net addition in the amount is for the deletion of asphalt paving, curb, and revisions to the loading dock, concrete of $9,694.00 and 20 calendar days, and gutter from the contract work ramp, six-foot cross gutter, front 5911 September 9, 1992 entry sidewalk and handicap ramp. An additional handicap ramp was added along with a bollard, wire mesh at rear sidewalk, exterior plaster modifications and the addition of a 3/4-inch channel screed at two locations on the north side of the buildings. The revisions are required in order to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title 24, Access to Public Buildings. Item 10, in the amount of $6,622.00 and 14 calendar days, is for the modification of the gravity conveyors, dish sink and hood in Room 118. The Contractor was also directed to fabricate and install stainless steel support legs for the hood and 316 stainless steel valve handle guide for the dish sink. The rework was necessary because of incomplete information on specified equipment. (As part of the payment negotiations, no profit or overhead is included in this work.) Item 11, in the amount of $1,548.00 (which excludes profit) and one calendar day, provides for four additional chases to conceal power, telephone, and data conduit to the island laboratory bench tops from the second floor ceiling. Item 12, in the amount of $1,074.00 and three calendar days, is for the additional framing and drywall required for the fire -rated wall in the soffit area above Rooms 234 and 236. This work was necessary as there was not enough clearance in the soffit to allow for the HVAC ductwork and maintain the one -hour fire rating required for the corridor. Item 13, in the amount of $1,617.00 and seven calendar days, is for fabricating and installing additional velocity stacks for exhaust fans EF-3, EF-5, EF-6, EF-8, and EF-13. There was a dimensional error and only two stacks were called out when a total of seven were needed. Item 14, for $2,905.00 (which excludes profit), provides for an upgraded exhaust fan for EF-9. The system requires a specialized unit to ,W, exhaust combustible fumes. Item 15, in the amount of $7,418.00 and 20 calendar days, is for the modification of three exhaust air systems, EF-3, EF-4, and EF-5. This was recommended by the consultant as the most economical means to achieve the static pressures in the systems due to the changes in exhaust air conditions required under Change Order No. 5. At the time Change Order No. 5 was negotiated, it was unknown if the exhaust systems would require modifications to achieve the static pressures. Of the twelve exhaust air systems, these three fans could not be readjusted to meet the requirements. With the exception of Item 14, the above -described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. Items 1, 3, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 13 include design errors in staff's opinion and cost recovery will be negotiated with the consultant. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will be $1,011,639.55 and 386 calendar days time extension. This represents an increase of 14.2% over the original contract amount. This includes $585,000 approved to date for reconfiguration of the Central Laboratory to accommodate new laboratory functions. The work is nearly complete; it is expected that additional laboratory changes will add approximately $50,000 to $55,000 to the above amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 12 for an addition of $58,714.00 and 72 calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation. -4- September 9, 1992 9(d): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 13 TO CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. J-19-1. `-01 Job No. J-19-1, Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, is part of the $66 million master -planned Central Power Generation System which is being built under several contracts at both plants. This $15.9 million contract includes installation of three pre -purchased digester gas burning, spark -ignited, 3472 horsepower engines with generators which are each capable of producing 2500 KW of electrical power. Change Order No. 13 is an addition of $46,279.00 to the contract for five items of additional work. Item 1, in the amount of $18,550.00, is for providing junction boxes, wiring, and conduit to supply power for emergency light fixtures not included in the contract documents. Item 2, in the amount of $18,191.00, is for providing conduit, wire, terminations, and testing for additional power, control, and signal circuits for the Districts' -supplied equipment not included in the contract documents. Item 3, in the amount of $4,014.00, is for providing an access ladder, receptacle, light fixture, and switch in the elevator shaft which are required by the State Elevator Code to provide safe access and working conditions, omitted in the contract documents. Item 4, in the amount of $1,921.00, is for adding push -buttons, indicating lights, and terminal boards to the engine status panel which are required to make this contractor -furnished control panel compatible with the Districts' -supplied equipment. These control panel features were omitted in the contract documents. Item 5, in the amount of $3,603.00, is for providing support lintels for three glass block windows and widening window openings at the Central Power Generation Building entrance door to allow room for glass block expansion joints. The height of these windows exceed the allowable unsupported height specified in the building code and support lintels are required. The supports were omitted in the contract drawings. Except for Item 5, the above described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. A portion of Item 5 involves rework and the appropriate cost will be negotiated with the designer. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will be $514,684.00 and 103 calendar days time extension. This represents an increase of 3.3% over the original contract amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 13 for an addition of $34,279.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(e): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 13 TO CONSTRUCTION OF DIGESTERS NOS. 11-16 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-3; REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 9 AND 10 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-35-2; AND INSTALLATION OF WASTE DIGESTER GAS FLARE FACILITIES AT PLANTS 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-21. This $27.8 million project includes the construction of new Digesters 11-16 (Job No. P1-34-3), the rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 (Job No. PI-35-2) and the construction of new digester gas flare facilities at Plants 1 and 2 (Job No. J-21). Change Order No. 13 adds $15,957.00 for two items of -� additional work to Job No. P1-34-3. -5- September 9, 1992 Item 1, for $6,105.00, involves piping modifications to the low pressure digester gas piping located on the walls of Control Building 11-14. The modifications were required to avoid conflict with HVAC equipment shown on the contract plans in the same area. Item 2 makes pipe support changes to the digester gas piping on the roofs of the two control buildings for $9,852.00. The specified pipe support required revisions to allow for piping clearance over a parapet wall and maintaining the necessary slope of the pipe invert for condensation drainage. The above -described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase and are not for replaced work. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will be $632,315.54 and 27 calendar days time extension. This represents an increase of 2.3% over the original contract amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 13 for an addition of $15,957.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(f): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 TO ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP DRIVES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-42-1. Job No. P2-42-1 at Plant No. 2 is a $9.4 million project that includes the replacement of thirteen existing internal combustion engines and three existing electric motors, replacement of existing influent pumps and construction of a power building for variable frequency drive equipment. Change Order No. 5 is an addition of $17,689.00 to the contract for six items of additional work. Item 1 required the disconnecting and reconnecting of a previously assembled electric motor to accommodate maintenance by the Districts on an existing pump at a cost of $1,840.00. Item 2, in the amount of $411.00, was to relocate power for the harmonic filter control from one panel to another of GOBS Pumps 3, 4, and 5 to assure that in a power failure all pumps would not be affected. Item 3, in the amount of $4,875.00, was to replace ten pressure switches for regulating the flow of pump seal water because they would not work properly with the plant water. Item 4 was the addition of electric motor shaft lubricating oil controllers at a cost of $1,422.00. Item 5 was the removal of existing engine and auxiliary equipment concrete pads that were operation and maintenance obstructions at a cost of $8,252.00. Item 6 was the replacement of lighting fixture ballast housings due to a drawing error at a cost of $889.00. Items 1, 4, and 5 would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. Items 2, 3, and 6 include costs resulting from design errors for which partial reimbursement is appropriate and will be negotiated with the design engineer. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will be $116,410.00 and zero calendar days time extension. This represents an increase of 1.2% over the original contract amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 5 for an addition of $17,689.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper and C. S. Alper Construction Co. There is no time extension associated with this change order. ff:M September 9, 1992 9(g): APPROVAL OF ADDENDA NOS. 1, 2, 3, AND 4 AND AWARD OF PUMP STATION TELEMETRY AND MONITORING SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-28. In January, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Job No. J-28 which replaces the telemetry in two plant and twenty-nine outlying collection system pump stations. (Since approval, telemetry for five stations was deleted.) The existing telemetry which was installed over twenty years ago has become generally unreliable and many spare parts are no longer available. As recommended by the Master Plan, improved telemetry and monitoring will significantly reduce the chances of sewage overflows. The upgraded installations, designed by staff, will provide continuous information on the status of each critical pump station, maintain records for preventive maintenance and allow for future remote control. (1) Addendum No. 1 Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications changes the bid opening date from June 9, 1992 to July 7, 1992. (2) Addendum No. 2 Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications changes the bid opening date from July 7, 1992 to August 4, 1992. (3) Addendum No. 3 Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications deletes telemetry for three pump stations (which are planned to be abandoned) from the project; changes five non -critical pump stations to an autodialer system; deletes the following; a) uninterruptible power supply from seventeen pump stations, b) a one-year maintenance contract, c) pressure transducers (they will be installed by staff), and d) a control room overhead projector; reduces the quantity of graphic displays and training hours; adds factory testing requirements, and makes minor changes to procedural requirements and technical details. (4) Addendum No. 4 Addendum No. 4 to the plans and specifications deletes the Wastehauler Pump Station from the project, allows bids from contractors with Class A licenses and revises equipment locations in four pump stations. (5) Award of Contract On August 4, 1992, five bids were received for the Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring Systems, Job No. J-28. The bids ranged from a high of $607,500.00 to a low of $374,100.00, submitted by Domar Electric, Inc. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda material. Staff recommends award to Domar Electric, Inc. for their low bid amount of $374,100.00. The engineer's estimate was $400,000.00. -7- September 9, 1992 9(h): APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR WASTEWATER QUALITY, DIVERSION AND TREATMENT STUDY. In July 1991, the Directors approved a professional services agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the preparation of a wastewater quality, diversion and treatment study to investigate the quality of upper basin tributary waters and determine the impact on the Districts' treatment processes. The study reviews the present and anticipated future quality of the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) wastewater, compares it to other trunklines, evaluates current trunkline diversion and water reclamation strategies, and recommends future trunkline diversion strategies. The goal is to ensure a high quality Plant No. 1 effluent for reclamation, and maximum flexibility in operating and managing the Districts' sewerage system. Boyle Engineering Corporation is in the process of completing the report and it has become apparent that the budget amounts originally designated for the various work categories require adjusting to more closely reflect the actual effort required. Therefore, staff is recommending that Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation be approved, providing for reallocation of funds at no increase in the total contract amount, as follows: Proposed Existing Proposed Revised Agreement Addn. No. 1 Agreement Direct Labor, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 153%), not to exceed $71,160 $6,031 $77,191 Direct Expenses, at cost, not to exceed 8,000 (6,031) 1,969 Fixed Profit 8,895 0 8,895 Total, not to exceed $88,055 0 S88,055 The action appearing on the agenda is to adopt a resolution approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation providing for a reallocation of funds at no increase in the total contract amount. A copy of the resolution is attached with the agenda supporting documents. DISTRICT 2 9(i): APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR NEW EASEMENT WITH OWNER OF PARKSIDE APARTMENT COMPLEX RE RELOCATION OF CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER AND QUITCLAIMING OLD EASEMENT. The Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9, was completed in February 1961 from Yorba Linda Boulevard to Imperial Highway following the natural drainage pattern of the area. The pipe, installed in the low-lying area September 9, 1992 of the drainage course, is an 18-inch VCP in the lower reach and a 15-inch VCP in the upper reach. A portion of the pipe on the west side of the Orange Freeway and north of Bastanchury Road meanders through the Parkside Apartment complex within an easement granted to the District prior to construction. This portion has required emergency repairs in two locations and maintenance capabilities are limited by both development and lack of access easements. Sags in the line within the apartment complex have developed and the line is cracked and in danger of collapse. In October 1990, the Directors authorized preparation of a project report to review the status of the line. The project report recommended relocation of the subtrunk sewer through the Parkside Apartments to a new location in private driveways and alleys. A design contract was awarded by the Directors in August 1992 to prepare plans and specifications for the relocation. The owner of the Parkside Apartments has agreed to dedicate a new easement at no cost to District 2, including a temporary construction easement. District 2, in turn, will quitclaim the old easement upon completion of the necessary construction, and will connect the complex to the relocated line. The action appearing on the agenda is to approve the easement agreement with the owner of the Parkside Apartment complex. Staff recommends approval. DISTRICT 14 9(j): RECEIVE, FILE AND INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION NO. 1--SAN JOAQUIN HILLS ROAD ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14. The District has received a request from The Irvine Company to annex 54.52 acres of territory located in the vicinity of the northwest corner of San Joaquin Hills Road and Newport Coast Drive in unincorporated County territory. This property is uninhabitated. The annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for annexing properties. The local sewering agency is the Irvine Ranch Water District. Staff recommends approval of the resolution attached to the agenda material initiating proceedings for said Annexation No. 1. ***END OF CONSENT CALENDAR*** ALL DISTRICTS 11. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on September 2, 1992. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on the Committee's deliberations and its recommended actions for consideration by the Boards. -9- September 9, 1992 12: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. JWS:jt ay lvester eral pager -10- 111..✓ 1-U Elm RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS September 2, 1992 of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1CS44 ELLIS AVENUE P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 9272B-6127 REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE (714)982-2411 Meeting Date: September 2, 1992 FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Director William Mahoney, Joint Chairman James V. Evans Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Don Griffin Steve Coma, Merrill Lynch Evelyn Hart Melissa Waters, Merrill Lynch Iry Pickler Steve Cole, Mudge Rose Peer Swan James Wahner Grace Winchell STAFF PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager ABSENT: Blake Anderson, Director of Technical Services John Gullixson Thomas Dawes, Director of Engineering Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Maintenance Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations Dan Dillon, Accounting Manager Patti Gorczyca, Financial Manager 1) Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Series "C" Certificates of on*M^n+:nn trniax C4nnn^4nn Staff reported that Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 & 11 successfully negotiated sale of the $98,500,000, 25-year, variable rate Certificates of Participation Series "C" issue on September 1, 1992. The issuance was backed by a Standby Bond Purchase Agreement provided by Federal Guaranty Insurance Company Securities Purchase, Inc., as well as Municipal Bond New Issue Insurance provided by Federal Guaranty Issuance Company. The ratings assigned to the issue were AAA/A-1+ by Standard and Poor's Corporation and Aaa/VMIG1 by Moody's Investors Service. The proceeds from this financing are being used to finance the cost of acquisition and construction of various capital projects, which consist of certain jointly owned sewage treatment and disposal facilities and certain trunk sewer lines owned by Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 11. Additional proceeds will be used to reimburse the participating Districts for the cost of individually owned trunk sewer lines and jointly owned sewage treatment and disposal facilities. Staff summarized the terms of the issue's final structure and the market conditions during the issue's pricing. Based on market conditions, the then pending California State budget and subsequent note issuance, and the Districts' (1 of 8) Fiscal Policy Committee Report September 2, 1992 .- need for capital, the financing team chose to implement a variable rate financing (daily reset) and selected a September 1 date to price and sell the certificates as previously authorized by the Boards. Staff reported that the issue closed with an initial rate of 2.70%. Enclosed is a pricing book summarizing information pertaining to the Series "C" COP transaction. 2) User Fee Increases to Make Districts' Property Taxes. 3 for the State's Confiscati Staff reported that earlier that day the Governor had signed a compromise budget submitted by the State Legislature which includes a $375 million state-wide property tax shift from special districts to the State to help finance their Proposition 98 school funding obligations. The State's budget provides that 35% of special districts' property tax revenues, not to exceed 10% of total revenues, will be shifted. What constitutes total revenues has not been fully defined yet so we are not sure whether it will be a factor, but there's a possibility that the 10% limit could help some Districts. However, if the 10% cap precludes a total state-wide shift of $375 million, then the county auditors are authorized to shift up to an additional 5% (ie., a total of 40%) of the special districts' property taxes. Following is a table reflecting each District's maximum tax loss under both scenarios, which total $12.0 million and $13.7 million, respectively; and tables showing the impact of both the 35% and the 40% shift on Districts' user fees, in the event the Directors elect to replace the property tax shortfall by increasing user fees in 1992-93: 1992-93 PROPERTY TAX LOSS Current Tax 35% Tax 40% Tax DISTRICT Revenue Loss Loss 1 $ 2,060,000 ($721,000) ($824,000) 2 9,105,000 (3,186,750) (3,642,000) 3 11,665,000 (4,082,750) (4,666,000) 5 2,816,000 (985,600) (1,126,400) 6 1,467,000 (513,450) (586,800) 7 4,430,000. (1,550,500) (1,772,000) 11 2,652,000 (928,200) (12060,800) Total $34,195,000 ($11,968,250) ($13,678,000) (2 of 8) Fiscal Policy Committee Report September 2, 1992 1992-93 S.F.R. USER FEE ADJUSTMENTS Required to Replace 35% Property Tax Shift (7/1-10/15/92) (10/16/92-6/30/93) Current Proposed Annual Fee Total Current 1992-93 1992-93 Increase Revised 1992-93 Pro -Rated Pro -Rated 1992-93 1992-93 DISTRICT SFR Fee SFR Fee SFR Fee SFR Fee SFR Fee 1 $75.00 $21.88 $62.88 $ 9.76 $ 84.76 2 60.00 17.50 54.58 12.08 72.08 3 60.00 17.50 57.04 14.54 74.54 5 75.00 21.88 90.27 37.15 112.15 6 65.00 18.96 58.03 11.99 76.99 7 40.00 11.67 43.96 15.63 55.63 11 60.00 17.50 60.73 18.23 78.23 1992-93 S.F.R. USER FEE ADJUSTMENTS Required to Replace 40% Property Tax Shift (7/1-10/15/92) (10/16/92-6/30/93) Current Proposed Annual Fee Total Current 1992-93 1992-93 Increase Revised 1992-93 Pro -Rated Pro -Rated 1992-93 1992-93 DISTRICT SFR Fee SFR Fee SFR Fee SFR Fee SFR Fee 1 $75.00 $21.88 $64.28 $11.16 $ 86.16 2 60.00 17.50 56.31 13.81 73.81 3 60.00 17.50 59.12 16.62 76.62 5 75.00 21.88 95.58 42.46 117.46 6 65.00 18.96 59.74 13.70 78.70 7 40.00 11.67 46.19 17.86 57.86 11 60.00 17.50 63.34 20.84 80.84 (3 of 8) Fiscal Policy Committee Report September 2, 1992 Staff clarified differences between the final adopted State budget and earlier versions. The original proposal by the Governor would have shifted $347 million state-wide and 100%, or $34.2 million, of the Districts' property tax revenue to the schools. The final budget shifts $375 million, but only 35-40% of special districts' property tax revenue. The difference is the original $347 million proposal applied only to enterprise special districts, whereas the $375 million final budget shift applies to all special districts. It was also pointed out that the Governor and State Legislators have claimed that they are really not taking any tax monies from special districts since the State provided bailout/special district augmentation funding (SDAF) following Proposition 13; and they argue that consequently they are now merely shifting what has heretofore been a "windfall" for special districts. In the case of the Orange County Sanitation Districts, that is simply a hollow claim. Our Districts never received State bailout funds following Proposition 13, nor have we ever received any SDAF monies since Proposition 13 was implemented. The only property taxes that we have ever received are the historical share of the property tax that we have been entitled to all along. The POTW community vigorously argued that point but the concerns expressed by local government were, for the most part, not well received by the Sacramento majority. We were, however, able to defeat a proposal to fund the State Water Resources Control Board activities by leveying a fee on NPDES Permits that would have cost our Districts between $750,000 and $2.5 million. This proposal has been floated each of the past few years at budget time and so far we have been able to defeat it. The Districts collect their annual user fees on the property tax bill as it is the most cost-effective way to do it. As previously reported to the Boards, the Districts were required to submit the 1992-93 user fees (which were previously adopted by the Boards at the same rates as for 1991-92) by August 24th in order to meet the County Auditor's deadline for placing them on the property tax bill for 1992-93. Accordingly, we submitted the required information to the County Auditor by the deadline. An additional provision in the State's budget action now allows special districts to submit fee information for collection on the tax bill to the County Auditor up to October 1st. At one time the State was considering waiving the public notice and hearing procedures for fee increases caused as a result of the State's property tax shift from special districts to the schools because of the time restraints for implementing changes; however, that did not occur. Staff reported that if it is the Boards' decision to increase 1992-93 user fees to make up for the property tax loss, it could be accomplished by the October 1st deadline as set forth in the following time table: (4 of 8)/ k n Fiscal Policy Committee Report September 2, 1992 Time Table for Adjusting 1992-93 User Fees September 2 - Consideration and guidance by Fiscal Policy Committee September 8 - Publish notice of proposed user fee increase and public hearing on September 16th September 9 - Joint Board meeting to consider recommendations of Fiscal Policy Committee Declare CEQA Exemption Introduction and first reading of ordinance adjusting user fees for 1992-93 Fix public hearing for Wednesday, September 16th at 7:30 p.m. Adjourn Joint Boards to September 16th September 15 - Second publication of notice of proposed user fee increase and public hearing September 16 - Adjourned Joint Board meeting Second reading and consideration of adoption of user fee increase ordinance Direct County Auditor to collect the fees on property tax bill October 1 - File revised 1992-93 user fee rate computer tapes with County Auditor October 16 New user fees take effect 1''J (5 of 8) Fiscal Policy Committee Report September 2, 1992 Also discussed were potential impacts of possibly reduced assessed valuations because of the current state of the economy. Preliminary information indicates that values are up in all Districts. There is also language in the State's budget act relating to possible exemption from seizure of property taxes committed to debt service. As the Directors are aware that the Boards have previously adopted a resolution so declaring major portions of our property taxes because of the Districts' debt financing capital program and the anticipated inclusion of this provision in the law. Finally, there are some organizations questioning the constitutionality of the State's action and considering bringing suit. The General Counsel is continuing to review these two latter items and will report back. The Committee entered into a lengthy discussion of the impacts on the Districts of the property tax shift ordered by the Governor and State Legislature. The alternatives for making up the $12.0 - $13.7 million property tax loss are summarized in the enclosed staff reports dated September 1, 1992 (tan), August 18, 1992 (white) and August 13, 1992 (gray). One option is issuance of short-term notes similar to tax revenue anticipation notes (TRANS), which is a fairly common practice by many governmental agencies to provide cash -flow funding pending receipt of annual property taxes and which often results in net arbitrage earnings to the agency. The Districts have considered TRANS in the past but it was determined by bond counsel that they could not be utilized because of the Districts' financial structure. However, because of the state's action in confiscating Districts' property taxes, bond counsel has now ruled that the Districts could issue taxable short-term notes as an alternative to raising 1992-93 user fees, and then raise fees in 1993-94 to make up for both the property tax loss and to pay off the notes and interest. The Districts could realize as much as $1.7 million in net arbitrage earnings from such a transaction. It was the consensus of the Committee that inasmuch as there is a strong likelihood that the state will ultimately take all of the Districts' property taxes (see copy of enclosed September 1, 1992 letter from Senator Marian Bergeson [ivory]) that delaying user fee increases would mean that next year the rate increase would probably have to be about double what it would otherwise be, and that such an adjustment would be considerably more difficult to deal with and explain. Use of existing reserves is another option that could be used to offset the 1992-93 property tax loss. However, dipping into reserves would actually exacerbate the property tax loss problem because the Districts would also lose interest earnings on those reserves that would be depleted. Further, the current reserve strategy is a major reason that the Districts enjoy an extremely favorable reputation and position in the bond market which saves millions of dollars in debt service interest. Lastly, because of the very nature of expansive wastewater treatment activities, a strong reserve position is absolutely essential in assuring that the Districts will be able to weather major emergency situations or other crises. The Committee discussed at great length the matter of further budgetary cuts. It was pointed out that in putting together the 1992-93 budgets, the Committee recognized the current state of the economy and the possibility that Districts' property taxes could be reduced or taken altogether, and therefore 29 M (6 of 8) Fiscal Policy Committee Report September 2, 1992 sharpened the budget pencil and cut it by $54.2 million under the 1991-92 budget. This was accomplished in spite of the fact that Districts' costs of operation continue to rise because of the added costs of complying with regulatory requirements, both air quality and water quality, and costs associated with increasing sewerage flows resulting from ongoing development and population increases. Part of the costs associated with these two are, of course, the expenses necessary for operating and maintaining the approximately $100 million in new facilities that are placed into service each year. The impacts of inflation also affect our costs. It was noted that due to the probable delay in starting up central generation we anticipate running over the budget because we will not realize the full electrical cost savings anticipated with an earlier start-up. It was also noted that there are few discretionary expenditures in operating wastewater treatment facilities. Although some further operating budget cuts could be made, any meaningful reductions would impair our operating and maintenance capabilities for processing 230 million -gallons -per -day, and thus jeopardize our ability to keep the collection, treatment and disposal facilities in a state of repair that enables us to continuously comply with regulatory requirements and protect public health, the marine environment and the beaches. Research and development is an example of what might be considered discretionary, and there are some others. But, it was observed, Districts' research and development is directed towards the goals of finding better and more efficient ways of doing things, and assuring that the public's health and the environment are being adequately protected. The same can be said of such activities as our involvement in legislative and regulatory affairs which is to bring some rationality to laws and regulations that will, in the long run, save millions of dollars. It is the consensus of the Committee that the staff and the Boards of Directors had, in response to the current state of the economy and in anticipation of reductions in the Districts' property taxes by the State, already acted in an earnest and responsible manner by cutting $54.2 million from the 1992-93 budget and holding 1992-93 fees at the same level as 1991-92; and that further 1992-93 budget cuts would jeopardize the integrity and quality of the Districts' wastewater management program and the Boards' level of service commitment to the citizens, communities and the coastal cities for the protection of public health and the environment. The Committee was also concerned that further cutbacks would jeopardize the Districts' 301(h) Waiver NPDES Permit which saves the citizens of Orange County $50 million a year. However, the Members also agreed that the Fiscal Policy Committee and staff should continue to work together to consider potential future opportunities for budgetary savings and operational economies. For the reasons enumerated above, it is the consensus of the Committee that the action of the Governor and State Legislature in confiscating up to $13.7 (40%) million of the Districts annual property tax, and the likelihood that the State will eventually take 100% or ($34.2 million) of the Districts' annual property taxes, the Directors have no viable alternative but to raise user fees (7 of 8) Fiscal Policy Committee Report September 2, 1992 to make up for the loss. The Committee also feels quite strongly that the Districts should put together a public information program to inform citizens that this action is necessary only because of the State's seizure of local property taxes, ie., to lay the blame exactly where it belongs, at the feet of the Governor and Members of the State Legislature. Recommendations: The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends: a) That the Districts' 1992-93 user fees be increased, in accordance with the time table hereinabove set forth, to make up for the minimum 35% confiscation of Districts' property taxes by the State of California, as follows: 1992-93 S.F.R. USER FEE ADJUSTMENTS (7/1-10/15/92) Current Current 1992-93 1992-93 Pro -Rated DISTRICT SFR Fee SFR Fee (10/16/92-6/30/93) Proposed 1992-93 Pro -Rated SFR Fee Annual Fee Total Increase Revised 1992-93 1992-93 SFR Fee SFR Fee 1 $75.00 $21.88 $62.88 $ 9.76 $ 84.76 2 60.00 17.50 54.58 12.08 72.08 3 60.00 17.50 57.04 14.54 74.54 5 75.00 21.88 90.27 37.15 112.15 6 65.00 18.96 58.03 11.99 76.99 7 40.00 11.67 43.96 15.63 55.63 11 60.00 17.50 60.73 18.23 78.23 This recommendation is made with the understanding that not all of the information pertaining to the impact of the State's budget act is yet available, ie., definition of total revenue vis-a-vis application of the 1004 cap provision, and new assessed valuations; and that if forthcoming information prior to the Boards' scheduled consideration of the fee adjustments on September 16th indicates that the required increase would be less, then the proposed fees could be adjusted accordingly on that date. b) That the staff be directed to develop and implement a public information program explaining the need to raise Districts' sanitary sewer service charges to recover property taxes confiscated by the State as a result of the action of the Governor and State Legislature, that will initially take up to 40% of the Districts' annual property taxes. JWS:sc V3 Enclosures (8 of 8) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA September 1, 1992 SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE P o eox 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-B127 (714) 962-2411 Subject: State Shift of Districts Property Taxes and Options to Make Up Lost Property Taxes The August 18, 1992 Staff Report to the Fiscal Policy Committee identified three options for replacing lost property taxes including: 1) Further budgetary cuts 2) Use of Reserves 3) Increased User Fees Because of the impact of the State's property tax shift we have been discussing the issues with bond counsel and there now appears to be a fourth alternative because of the State's action. Bond counsel has advised us that a short-term or interim borrowing is now an option, Short term borrowings usually referred to as notes, are a common funding mechanism used by municipal entities. The committee may recall that it considered staff and bond counsel reports on the potential issuance of notes by the Districts' at its September and October 1991 meetings. At that time it was determined that the Districts' could not proceed with the issuance of notes because the Districts could not provide sufficient legal justification necessary to demonstrate the cash flow deficit requirements supporting the issuance of interim tax-exempt notes, pursuant to federal law. Staff has since asked Districts' special counsel to review whether the Districts could issue notes to provide replacement funding for those property tax revenues reallocated to the State until the Districts obtained increased user fees. Special counsel concluded that the Districts could issue a short term borrowing if done on a taxable basis, given the strength of the Districts' reserves. The following outlines the benefits of such a note structure and how it would be implemented for the specified purpose of bridging the short term loss of Ad Valorem revenues. Benefits • Allows for delay of user fee increase until normal tax cycle (November of 1993). • Allows reserves to remain untapped, preserving investment income at taxable yields. • Permits greater flexibility and time to determine long term policy of replacing Ad Valorem revenues. 0 Allows proceeds of the notes to be invested at a yield in excess of the yield on the notes. Structure • Taxable notes would be issued by the Districts. The taxable structure would be used to avoid certain IRS restrictions. • Proceeds from the sale of notes would be used to substitute for Ad Valorem receipts when such revenues would have become available. • Principal and interest on the notes would be paid from increased user fees, due in December of 1993, and excess interest earnings on reserves. Timetable The notes should be structured and marketed prior to the first Ad Valorem revenues shortfall during November 1992. Interest Earnings Results Attached is a cash flow analysis illustrating the magnitude of net interest earnings possible assuming a worst case 40% Ad Valorem loss. The cash flow analysis presents an Option 1 corresponding to a reserves draw to fund the Ad Valorem shortfall and Option 2 representing the issuance of notes. As indicated, the Option 2 presents a net interest earnings to the Districts of approximately $1,789,588. The cash flow analysis' assumptions are noted by footnotes but both assume a roll over of the initial one year notes to allow debt repayment after increased user fee revenues are available commencing November 1993. District staff and financing team will be available at the meeting to present this fourth alternate and to answer any questions. MERRILL LYNCH & CO. 09/03/92 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1 Year Note Analysis 8: 40% Ad Valorem Loss Option 1 Ad Valorem Revenues Replaced By Reserve Draws in December & April ------------------------------------------------------- 9.050% Reserve interest Net Draws to On Remaining Reserve Fund Month ------------ Reserves (1) ------------ Fund AV Loss ------------ Reserves (2) Balance ------------ ------------ 10/01/92 84,300,000 635,763 11/01/92 84,935,763 640,557 12/01/92 78,736,320 6,840,000 593,803 01/01/93 79,330,123 598,281 02/01/93 79,928,404 60Z,793 03/01/93 80,531,198 607,339 04/01/93 74,298,537 6,840,000 560,335 05/01/93 74,858,872 564,561 06/01/93 75,423,432 568,818 07/01/93 7-5,992,251 573,108 08/01/93 76,565,359 577,430 09/01/93 77,142,789 581,785 10/01/93 77,724,575 5B6,ST3 11/01/93 78,310,747 590,594 12/01/93 78,901,341 595,048 01/01/94 79,496,389 599,535 02/01/94 80,095,924 604,05T 03/01/94 80,699,981 608,612 04/01/94 81,308,593 613,202 05/01/94 81,921,795 617,82T 06/01/94 82,539,622 622,486 07/01/94 83,162,109 627,181 08/01/94 83,789,289 631,911 09/01/94 84,421,200 636,6T7 84,421,200 13,680,000 14,437,877 85,05T,8T7 (1) Assumes Initial Reserves of M .30 KM (2) July Net Yield in Orange County Commingled Pool (3) 1 Year T-Bill Rate Plus 80 SP (assumed financing rate) (4) Note Proceeds Invested in Commingled Pool Option 2 Ad Valorem Revenues Replaced By Issuance of $13.68 MM Interim Notes 9.050% Interest Wet Principal 4.350% Payout of 9.050% On Remaining Reserve Fund on $13.68 MM interest on Total Proceeds to Interest On Net Reserves (1) ------------ Reserves (2) ------------ Balance Interim Votes ------------ ------------ Notes (3) ------------ Debt Service ------------ Replace AV ------------ Proceeds (4) ------------ Debt Service ------------ 84,300,000 635,763 49,590 49,590 103,170 (53,580) 84,935,763 640,557 49,590 49,590 103,170 (53,580) 85,576,320 645,3BB 49,590 49,590 6,840,000 51,585 (1,995) 86,221,708 650,255 49,590 49,590 51,585 (1,995) $6,871,963 655,159 49,590 49,590 51,585 (1,995) 87,527,123 660,100 49,590 49,590 51,585 (1,995) 88,187,223 665,079 49,590 49,590 6,840,000 0 49,590 88,852,302 670,094 49,590 49,590 0 49,590 89,522,396 675,148 49,590 49,590 0 49,590 90,197,544 680,240 49,590 49,590 0 49,590 90,877,784 685,3T0 49,590 49,590 0 49,590 91,563,154 690,539 49,590 49,590 0 49,590 92,253,693 695,747 49,590 49,590 0 49,590 92,949,439 700,994 49,590 49,590 0 49,590 93,650,433 706,280 6,840,000 49,590 6,889,590 0 6,889,590 94,356,713 711,607 24,795 24,795 0 24,T95 95,068,320 716,9T4 24,795 24,795 0 24,795 95,785,294 722,381 24,795 24,795 0 24,795 96,507,6T4 727,829 6,840,000 24,795 6,864,795 0 6,864,795 97,235,503 733,318 0 0 0 0 97,968,821 738,848 0 0 0 0 98,707,669 744,420 0 0 0 D 99,452,089 750,035 0 0 0 0 100,202,124 ------------ 755,691 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ 16,657,815 ------------ ------------ 100,957,815 13,680,000 ------------ 843,030 ------------ 14,523,030 ------------ 13,680,000 ------------ 412,680 ------------ 14,110,350 Total Draws SLWARY: Reserves Net D/S Balance option 1: 85,057,8T7 0 $5,057,877 option 2: 100,957,815 ------------ 14,110,350 ------------ 66,847,465 ------------ Net Difference 15,699,938 14,110,350 1,789,588 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS I u August 18, 1992 STAFF REPORT of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 ELLIS AVENUE P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 SUBJECT: State's Proposed Shift of Districts' Property Taxes and Options to Make Up Lost Property Taxes As reported to the Directors at the August 12th Board Meeting, the "Budget Olympics" are continuing in Sacramento as the Governor and Legislature attempt to resolve the State's budget crisis. As you know, they have proposed to shift all or a portion of enterprise special districts' property tax revenue to the State to satisfy the State's obligations to fund schools under Proposition 98. There are currently two alternative proposals that would affect the Sanitation Districts. One is the so-called "Super Pot". Under this alternative all special districts' tax monies would be put into a single pot. In our case, our total $34.2 million in property taxes would be transferred. This would total just under $1.7 billion statewide. Twenty-five percent of that would then be appropriated for the schools and the balance distributed to special districts in a manner similar to the current Special District Augmentation Fund (SDAF) monies by County Supervisors. The second alternative that is being discussed is a proposal that would take between 25% and 30% of enterprise special districts' tax revenues and give that to the schools. In our case, 25% of our total property tax of $34.2 million would be $8.5 million. We would keep the rest. Obviously, the Sanitation Districts would prefer the second alternative. But under any proposal the Boards will be faced with a decision on how to make up for whatever property taxes are shifted in order to maintain the Districts' long-term financial integrity. An important point to remember is that the State will apparently continue to experience budgetary problems for the foreseeable future. To a large extent, their approach to solving their budgetary shortfalls has been to raid the treasuries of local government. Thus, it is clear that if they only succeed in grabbing a portion of enterprise special districts' property taxes this year, in all likelihood they will keep coming back for more next year and, ultimately, all of it in future years. Therefore, sooner or later the Districts will have to significantly increase user fees, over and above what will be necessary increases to finance rising costs of providing sewerage services to the communities we serve, to adequately fund the Districts requirements. (1 of 6) Staff Report re , State's Proposed Shift of Districts' Property Taxes/Options August 18, 1992 There are basically three options for making up lost property taxes: 1. Further budgetary cuts. 2. Use of reserves 3. Increase user fees These options are discussed in some detail below. Although there are numerous variations, we have limited our discussion to the three fundamental options to help focus on the impacts of the loss of the Districts historical share of the property tax. 1. Further Bud4etary Cuts Recognizing the current economic situation, in developing the 1992-93 budgets the Fiscal Policy Committee worked with staff to take a hard look at budgeted expenditures and determine where cuts could be made. After considerable deliberation the Committee recommended and the Boards approved a 1992-93 budget that is $54.2 million less than the 1991-92 budget, summarized as follows: Comparative Budget Summary Millions of Dollars Increase 1991-92 1992-93 <Decrease> Operations & Maintenance $ 61.4 $ 59.9 $< 1.5> Sewerage Facilities Construction 144.2 110.0 <34.2> Debt Service 35.5 39.0 3.5 Reserves 351.3 329.3 <22.0> $592.4 $538.2 $<54.2> W" (2 of 6) Staff Report re State's Proposed Shift of Districts' Property Taxes/Options August 18, 1992 All property taxes are allocated to the Operating Funds of the individual Districts, primarily to pay for debt service. Other operating maintenance and repair costs are essentially paid by user fees. The budgeted Operating Fund tax revenue and user fees of the respective Districts for 1992-93 are as follows: 1992-93 Budgeted Property Tax/User Fees Current Current Current User Fee District Tax Revenue User Fees Rate 1 $ 2,060,000 $ 5,941,000 $ 75.00 2 9,105,000 18,077,000 60.00 3 11,665,000 18,748,000 60.00 5 2,816,000 2,040,000 75.00 6 1,467,000 2,959,000 65.00 7 4,430,000 4,809,000 40.00 11 2,652,000 3,335,000 60.00 13* -0- 674,000 100.00 14* -0- -0- -0- Total/Avg. $34,195,000 $56,583,000 $ 60.01 *District 13 receives no property taxes. District 14 is financed by the Irvine Ranch Water District. Therefore, because they are not affected by the property tax shift they will not be discussed in this report. Most other costs of operations continue to rise for several reasons beyond our control. First are the added costs of complying with regulatory requirements - both air quality and water quality. Second are the costs associated with increasing sewerage flows resulting from ongoing development and population increases. Part of the costs associated with these two are, of course, the expenses necessary for operating and maintaining the approximately $100 million in new facilities that are placed into service each year. Finally, the impacts of inflation affect our costs. (3 of 6) Staff Report re State's Proposed Shift of Districts' Property Taxes/Options August 18, 1992 Notwithstanding these increasing costs, $1.5 million in operating budget cuts were made in 1992-93 and, as a result the operating budgets are very tight. In fact, due to the probable delay in starting up central generation we anticipate running over the budget because we will not realize the full electrical cost savings anticipated with an earlier start-up. There are few discretionary expenditures in operating wastewater treatment facilities. Although some further operating budget cuts might be made, any significant reductions would impair our operating and maintenance capabilities and jeopardize our ability to keep the collection, treatment and disposal facilities in a state of repair that enables us to continuously comply with regulatory requirements and protect public health, the marine environment and the beaches. The experience of our sister agencies (for example, the City of Los Angeles and the City of San Diego) has shown that when operating and maintenance budgets are inadequately financed it causes facilities breakdowns, which in the case of these two cities have resulted in repeated beach closures and attendant fines by regulatory authorities, as well as enforcement actions. With regard to the capital budgets, $34.2 million has already been cut from the 1992-93 budget. Additional cuts could be made in the capital budgets, however, the Directors discussed this at considerable length and concluded that it would be counterproductive in that it would further exacerbate the Orange County economic situation and, further, that it is advantageous to continue with the construction program because of the excellent bids that we are receiving. Moreover, most of the capital expenditures this year are for projects already underway. There is very little new work. Further, property taxes are not used to finance capital projects, except to the extent that they retire the securities issued by the Districts to finance the work. The Districts current capital program is being funded by issuance of debt in accordance with the Districts' long range financial plan. These funds are committed and must be spent within the specified time frame to avoid illegal arbitrage. Thus, there would be little advantage to further cutting the capital budget. 2. Use of Reserves Another option is to use existing reserves to offset the loss of property taxes. Enclosed is a separate staff report (gray) on user fees. Attached to the report are revised cash flow estimates for 1992-93 (tan and green) that reflect the impact on reserves for both the 100% tax loss scenario and the 25% tax loss scenario. The cash flows assume that the 1992-93 tax loss would not be recovered but that user fees would be raised in subsequent years to make up for the loss of property tax in each of those years. As a result, the reserves at the end of the five year period, which are shown on Line 17, are reduced by an amount greater than the first year's loss in property taxes because of loss of interest earnings on those monies in 1992-93 and subsequent years. If it were the Boards' desire to recoup those taxes lost the first year then the user fees would have to be increased accordingly in subsequent years over what is shown on Line 22. Following is a summary of the impact on each District for the two scenarios: (4 of 6) M Staff Report re State's Proposed Shift of Districts' Property Taxes/Options August 18, 1992 Impact of 1992-93 Tax Loss if Made up by Reserves $8.5 Million (25%) Tax Loss $34.2 Million (100%) Tax Loss Reduction in Reserves Reduction in Reserves 1992-93 1992-93 District Tax Loss 1992-93 By 1996-97 Tax Loss 1992-93 By 199 1 $ 515,000 $ 534,000 $ 739,000 $2,060,000 $2,136,000 $ 2,836,00 2 2,277,000 2,361,000 3,131,000 9,105,000 9,440,000 12,539 3 2,916,000 3,028,000 4,073,000 11,665,000 12,114,000 16,299 5 704,000 730,000 970,000 2,816,000 2,920,000 3,87E 6 367,000 381,000 511,000 1,467,000 1,523,000 2,04E 7 1,107,000 1,147,000 1,522,000 4,430,000 4,593,000 6,09E 11 663,000 687,000 913,000 2,652,000 2,749,000 3,651 Total $8,549,000 $8,868,000 $11,859,000 $34,195,000 $35,475,000 $47,349,000 3. Increase User Fees The third option is to offset the loss of property tax revenues by increasing user fees in an amount equivalent to recover a portion or the full amount of the loss. Unfortunately, there is a practical problem as well that may dictate what alternatives the Boards have for 1992-93. As the Directors are aware, we collect our annual sewer user fees on the property tax bill because it is the most cost-effective way to do it. In order to do this the County Auditor requires that we have our user fee rates to them on computer tapes by August 24th, which requires that they be processed several days in advance of that. Since the Governor and State Legislators have failed to come to terms on the state budget as of this writing, we have effectively missed this cut-off date. However, it may be that a supplemental tax bill could be issued and staff and counsel are looking into this possibility. There are certain obvious downsides to issuing a supplemental tax bill reflecting a fee increase. (5 of 6) r Staff Report re State's Proposed Shift of Districts' Property Taxes/Options August 18, 1992 The enclosed updated cash flows (blue and gold) reflect the impact on the Districts' financial position of increasing the user fee to make up for the property tax shortfall in 1992-93 and subsequent years. Basically, this alternative keeps the Districts in the exact same fiscal position as if there were no property tax shift; ie., as already budgeted for 1992-93 (see white cash flows), except that user fees would be increased to replace property taxes lost, as summarized below: Fee Increase to Raise $8.5 Million Fee Increase to Raise $34.2 Million Adopted 1992-93 25% Tax Loss 1992-93 100% Tax Loss 1992- District SFR Fee Fee Increase SFR Fee Fee Increase SFR F 1 $ 75.00 $ 6.97 (+ 9%) $ 81.97 $ 27.88 (+ 37%) 2 60.00 8.63 (+14%) 68.63 34.52 (+ 58%) 3 60.00 10.38 (+17%) 70.38 41.54 (+ 69%) 5 75.00 26.53 (+35%) 101.53 106.13 (+142%) 6 65.00 8.57 (+13%) 73.57 34.25 (+ 53%) 7 40.00 11.15 (+28%) 51.15 44.64 (+112%) 11 60.00 13.03 (+22%) 73.03 57.09 (+ 95%) 13 100.00 .00 100.00 .00 Avg 60.01 JILL2 +17% 70.13 JWS:sc Enclosures (6 of 6) $102. 94 101 181 99 o, 40.80 +68% 100. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA M '`111� 1% r August 13, 1992 STAFF REPORT 1992-93 SEWER USE FEES BACKGROUND 10844 ELLIS AVENUE P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 (714) S62-2411 During the 1980's and early 1990's, each of the Districts considered and adopted a sewer use fee for ongoing operations, maintenance and rehabilitation costs. Although property taxes, connection fees and federal and state construction grants have historically been the major sources of financing of Districts' activities, they became inadequate during this period. Since the passage of Proposition 13, all ad valorem property tax revenue has been used in the Operating Funds for maintenance, operations, rehabilitation and retirement of certificates of participation and none has been available for capital improvements. To keep pace with the stringent requirements of the federal, state and regional regulatory agencies for advanced wastewater treatment and air emissions control, all Districts except No. 14 review their user fee annually. No adjustment was made to the fees for 1992-93. The average annual fee for a single family residence is $60. District No. 14 is fully funded by the IRWD. In addition to new regulatory requirements, cost increases are also generally attributable to inflation, to additional flows generated by the natural population increases from the excess of births over deaths and in -migration. Federal and state assistance from the clean water grant program has been eliminated by Congress because of federal funding problems. As a part of the State of California budget deliberations for 1992-93, the Legislature and the Governor have currently proposed diverting all or a portion of the historical share of the property tax which has heretofore been allocated to special enterprise districts. For the Sanitation Districts this amounts to a reduction in budgeted revenue for 1992-93 of between $8.9 million (25%) and $34.2 million (100%), based on the two alternative proposals under consideration. The purpose of this report is to examine the impact of this significant loss of revenue upon the previously adopted user fees of each District. FUTURE FINANCING PROJECTIONS The attached Statement of Projected Cash Flows for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 (white) have been prepared in accordance with the adopted 1992-93 budgets and the "2020 VISION" Financial Plan recommendations that each District's share of the treatment plant construction, and its respective trunk sewer construction 1992-93 Sewer Use Fees r Page 2 August 13, 1992 • projects, be financed by a combination of increased connection fees to pay for new capacity and borrowing to pay for rehabilitation and improved treatment. Debt retirement and escalating operating and maintenance costs would now be paid by increasing the annual sewer use fees, or dipping into reserves since reduced or no property taxes will be available under the following assumptions: 1. Renewal of NPDES Permit and Continuation of Current Treatment Levels (301 fhl Waiver) This scenario continues to represents the minimum probable level of construction, rehabilitation and operations and maintenance costs. For the first five years of the planning period, the differences between renewal of our existing permit and full secondary treatment are not significant. Additional sewage flow and sewer connection assumptions are also consistent with the Master Plan. 2. Connection Fees The capital facilities connection fee includes the cost of future and existing facilities on a per unit basis. The reason to include future costs is that we any new flow will require new additional capacity. The connection fee policy provides for an annual adjustment of fees to reflect changes in the Engineering News Record -LA Construction Cost Index. A fee increase of 5% per year is projected in the cash flows for the years 1993-94 through 2001-02. The 1992-93 fee has been left at the 1991-92 level in accordance with a prior Board action. 3. Debt Over the next 10 years, all of the Districts except Nos. 13 and 14 are projected to issue COP -type debt to meet a portion of Joint Works treatment facilities improvements. Borrowing has been a part of the long-range financial plan for capital improvements since the policy of using all property tax revenues for operations, maintenance and rehabilitation was implemented. Extensive use of the now discontinued Federal and State Clean Water Grant Program enabled the Districts to stretch out their reserves and other income and to avoid borrowing until now. Three primary reasons to issue debt are: to protect and to preserve capital reserves; to avoid major increases and fluctuations in user fees from year-to-year; and to spread the cost of facilities over their useful lives. 1992-93 Sewer Use Fees Page 3 August 13, 1992 1`.011 The cash flow projections include regularly scheduled COP issues through 1995- 96 to meet capital project award and cash flow requirements, and to avoid federal interest earnings restrictions on unspent proceeds. The "2020 VISION" Financial Plan projected borrowing approximately $750 million and the Directors may want to extend this plan through 1996-97 in order to reach that target. 4. Reserves As a part of the financial plan developed by the financial team of the Fiscal Policy Committee, staff and consultants, the Boards have implemented a plan to build reserves for certain future events. The approved reserve policy calls for Dry -Period Reserves, Operating Contingency Reserves, Capital Project Reserves, Environmental Requirement Reserves, and Insurance Reserves. When an adequate funding level for these reserves has been reached, a Fee Stabilization Fund will be created. Increasingly stringent environmental standards at the federal, state, regional and local levels, as well as inflationary trends, have made it clear that user fee rates will have to increase - and at an accelerated pace - to maintain each District's financial integrity. However, there are several unknowns that could have a major impact on the projected cash flow requirements, including completion schedules for major facilities and the renewal of the Districts' 301(h) permit. The attached schedules assume all projects are completed as planned and may be considered worst case, or most costly, scenarios with the exception of the 301(h) issue. ANNUAL USER FEE HISTORY The sewer use fee program methodology is identical in each of the Districts; the only difference is the schedule of rates charged to the various categories of users, since each District's financial situation varies. The adopted programs are in accordance with the Districts' adopted Revenue Program required by the Federal Clean Water Act, and have been approved as "fair and equitable" by the State Water Resources Control Board. The user fees are collected as a separate line item on the annual County of Orange property tax bills. District No. 1 In late 1984, District No. 1 modified its long-range financial plan to include a supplemental sewer use fee. The initial fee was set at $60 per year for a single- family residence. Before the 1985-86 fees could actually be assessed, the 301(h) waiver was granted and the fees were reduced to $26.40 per year based upon water meter size. 1992-93 Sewer Use Fees Page 4 August 13, 1992 In August 1986, the State Water Resources Control Board revised their ruling that water meters provided a "fair and equitable" distribution of costs and required the District to change the user fee to a flat rate charge of $26.40 per year for 1987-88. Because of significant financial shortfalls in 1988, District No. 1 declared their intent to increase their use fee 30% annually in order to maintain their financial integrity. For the 1988-89 year, the Board again reviewed the Districts' long-range financial plan and subsequently increased the use fee to $34.32 per year. The single-family residential rate was $45.00 for 1989-90, $55.00 for 1990-91 AND $75.00 FOR 1991-92 AND 1992-93. The Master plan adopted in 1989 projected a fee of $100 by 1992-93. District No. 2 The District No. 2 Board approved the initial user fee for the District for 1990-91, and set the single-family residential rate at $55.00 per year. During the user fee adoption process, the Directors and the public were informed that the annual fee was projected to increase and could be as high as $75.00 for 1991-92. The rate adopted for 1991- 92 and 1992-93 was $60.00 for a single-family residence, consistent with the 1989 Master Plan. District No. 3 After several years of discussion, the District No. 3 Board adopted the sewer use fee program in March 1989 for the 1989-90 fiscal year in the amount of $30.36 per year. Future fees were expected to increase, but were not projected pending completion of the 30-year Master Plan. Major rehabilitation/repair of manholes damaged by corrosion, increasing costs described above, and the need to repay existing and future COP -type debt, required a rate increase for 1990-91 to $50.00 The single-family residential rate of $60.00 for 1991-92 and 1992-93 is below the Master Plan projection of $100 for 1992-93. District No. 5 The first District to implement a user fee was District No. 5 in 1981. The initial fee for a single-family residence was $26.40 per year, based on water meter size. When the program was originally presented to the public and adopted by the Board, it was anticipated that it might be necessary to increase the fee by approximately 77%, beginning in the second year, to finance the rehabilitation work on the trunk sewer system. With the exception of the state mandated change from a water meter basis to a flat -rate basis, the rates were unchanged until 1989-90 because of the decline in 1992-93 Sewer Use Fees Page 5 August 13, 1992 inflation, favorable bids on rehabilitation projects, delays in major plant projects and unexpected incases in assessed valuations. In accordance with the Master plan and to smooth the transition to the rates needed to retire future debt, the Board adopted the first increase in user fees effective 1989-90, with a single-family residential rate of $45.00 per year and increased it to $55.00 in 1990-91. The rate for 1991-92, $75.00 per year, continued the process recommended in the Master Plan and was consistent with the rate projected in the Master Plan. Maintaining that fee for 1992-93 brought the District below the Master Plan projection of $100. District No. 6 In 1983, District No. 6 became the second Sanitation District to implement a sewer use fee. During the public workshops and hearing, the public was advised that the fee was expected to increase substantially from the $26.40 per year for a single- family residence in the first year, to $46.80 per year in the second year, to cover rising costs and then remain at the increased level. However, the District was able to delay any fee increase until 1986-87, due to a decline in inflation rates, receipt of favorable bids on construction and rehabilitation projects, delays in project schedules, a significant increase in assessed valuation of `...� certain parcels in 1984-85, and the positive impact of the formation of District No. 14. The assessed valuation increase was reversed by the County Assessor in 1986- 87, however, and the use fee was increased by 10% to $29.04 for 1986-87, 10% to $31.68 for 1987-88, 10% to $38.02 for 1988-89, and 14% to $49.00 for 1989- 90 (the 1989-90 fee was slightly above the fee originally predicted for 1984-85), and 12% to $55.00 for 1990-91. The fee for 1991-92 and 1992-93, $65.00 for a single-family residence, reflected a necessary continuation of the fee increase to cover rising costs described above and to provide for debt service. The fee is below the $75.00 fee in the Master Plan projections. District No. 7 District No. 7 was the last of the Districts to adopt a user fee to supplement the property tax revenues. The 1991-92 year was the initial year of user fees and the rate was set at $40.00 for a single family residence; below the $50.00 fee projected in the Master Plan. The same fee and projection applies to 1992-93. M5 1992-93 Sewer Use Fees Page 6 August 13, 1992 District No. 11 District No. 11 modified its long-range financial plan in 1987 to include a sewer use fee to address a shortfall in ad valorem property tax revenues and to provide additional financing necessary for operations and maintenance and major facilities rehabilitation/repair. The use fee for a single-family residence was set at $26.40 per year for 1988-89, and was projected to be $45.00 per year by 1990-91. The Board adopted a fee of $40.00 per year for 1989-90. The increased costs described earlier and the need to repay debt issued in 1990-91 and 1991-92 required an increase in the single-family residential use fee to $60.00 for 1991-92. This fee was again adopted for 1992-93 and is lower than the $150 projected in the 1989 Master Plan. District No. 13 District No. 13 has never received ad valorem property tax revenues as a result of protracted tax exchange negotiations and settlement with the County, which ultimately led to the formation of the District. When District No. 13 was formed in 1985, the Directors set the annual use fee at $70.00 per household, higher than the fees in other Districts, as no property tax revenue is received by the District. A connection fee schedule was also implemented at that time to pay for additional facilities to serve new development. Despite increased costs of operating and maintaining the joint treatment facilities for the reasons described above, the sewer use fee in District No. 13 has increased only twice because proportionately higher development has spread fixed costs over more properties. In 1988-89, the fee was increased 12% to $78.40 per year, and for 1990-91 the annual fee was increased to $95.00 for a single-family residence. The fee adopted for 1991-92 and 1992-93, $100.00 for a single-family residence is lower than the $135 projected in the Master Plan for the slow growth assumption. CURRENT USER FEE ALTERNATIVES With the diversion by the State of between $8.9 million and $34.2 million from current operating fund revenues, the Directors may wish to reconsider the previously adopted user fees for 1992-93. In order to change the user fees on the 1992-93 property tax bills, any changed rates must be given to the County Auditor -Controller by August 24, 1992. Any actions now will not allow sufficient time for the County Data Center to prepare a tape for the Auditor -Controller, and will not be reflected on the regular tax bills until 1993-94 when the annual fees will again be considered. 1992-93 Sewer Use Fees Page 7 August 13, 1992 In the hope of an additional extension or a revised tax bill, the Directors may decide to increase the user fees to make up for the property taxes taken by the Governor and the Legislature. These fee adjustments are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. Fee Increase to Raise $8.9 Million Fee Increase to Raise $34.2 Million Adopted 1992-93 25% Tax Loss 1992-93 100% Tax Loss 1992-93 District SFR Fee Fee Increase SFR Fee Fee Increase SFR Fee 1 $75.00 $6.97 $ 81.97 $27.88 $102.88 2 60.00 8.63 68.63 34.52 94.52 3 60.00 10.38 70.38 41.54 101.54 5 75.00 26.53 101.53 106.13 181.13 6 65.00 8.57 73.57 34.25 99.25 7 40.00 11.15 51.15 44.64 84.64 11 60.00 13.03 73.03 57.09 112.09 13 100.00 .00 100.00 .00 100.00 14 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Average $ 60.01 $10.12 $ 70.13 $ 40.80 $100.81 The attached Statements of Cash Flow (blue and gold) have been prepared to show `..►� the effect of raising the user fee to compensate for the entire amount of property taxes to be lost. The effects of missing the deadline or electing not to increase the 1992-93 fees foregoing the lost taxes and increasing fees for 1993-94 and subsequent years are shown on the attached green and tan schedules. No action is required by Districts 13 or 14 as District 13 has never received any property tax revenue and District 14 is fully funded by the IRWD. REF: WPD OMSEWER. FEE\MMUSEFEE.1 6/17/92 CF 938.XLS 10:43 PM LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Last Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 $hare of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Unapprop or Portion of Insurance Reserve COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 THRU 14 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 1992-93 Budget Fees Same As 1991-92 5-Veer Tetel 5-Veer Total 6/17/92 , Page 1 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1992.1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total 113, 590.000 122,748,000 130,470.250 134,994.760 139,883, 500 113, 590,000 143,787, 500 113, 590,000 34,195,000 35,963.000 36,985,000 39,465,000 40.004,000 185,212,000 225,335.000 410,547,000 5.895.000 6.780.000 7,797,000 8,987,000 10,313.000 39,752,000 79,980.000 119,732,000 52,288,000 58,722,000 88,401,000 78.418,000 88,625.000 346,454,000 534,334,000 880,788,000 8,449,000 9,060.000 9.476,000 9,800,000 10.102.000 46,876,000 58,997,000 105,873,000 1,868,000 2.011,000 2,380,000 2.679,000 2,797,000 11,735,000 13,885,000 25,620,000 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 102,694.000 112,120,000 125.039,000 138.329,000 151,841,000 630.029,000 912,531,000 1.542,560,000 216.284,000 234.874.000 255.509.250 273,323.750 291,724,500 743,819.000 1,056,318,500 1.656,150,000 48,648,000 51,011.000 56,112,000 61.724,000 67,898.000 285,393,000 455,976.000 741,369,000 11.316.000 10,121.000 10,622,000 11,150,000 11,703,000 54.912.000 67,822,000 122,734.000 33,572,000 43,271,760 53,780,500 60.666.250 69,338,000 259,528,500 341.112,070 600,638.570 93.536.000 104.403,760 120,514.500 133.440,250 147,937,000 599,831.500 864.910.070 1,464,741,570 122.748,000 130,470, 250 134,994.750 139,883,500 143,787, 500 143.787.500 191.408,430 191.408,430 45,903,000 51.299,000 59.288.000 65,878.000 72,842,000 72,842,000 94,600,000 94,580,000 18,708.000 20,880,000 24.103,800 28,689,200 29.587,800 29,587,800 38,497,400 38.497,400 58,137.000 58,291,250 51.604,950 47,518.300 41,357,700 1 41,357,700 58,331,030 58,331,030 LINE 1 2 3 4 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 User Fee Information 21 22 Single Family Residence User Fee $60 $67 $78 $89 $101 $129 22 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 844,704 846,374 849,594 854.124 859,609 889,584 23 24 Estimated User Fees, Excludes IRWD 50,688,000 58,922.000 66,401,000 76,319,000 86,425,000 114,565,430 24 CF1 93AXLa 611710E ed7 PM P p 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper, 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19. 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserves 21 1992-93 Budget Fees Same As 1991-92 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 8117/92 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002 1A97.1907 1997.9nn7 1992-93 1993.94 1994-95 1995.96 199G-97 5-Year Total 5-Year Total 10-Year Total 9,135,000 8,375,000 8,039,750 8,268,250 9,161,000 9,135,000 10,978,000 9 135 000' 2,060,000 2,142,000 2.229,000 2,317.000 2,410,000 11,157,000 13,571.000 24.728,000 400,000 460.000 529,000 608.000 699,000 2,696,000 5,425,000 8,121.000 6,541.000 7.025,000 8,891.000 10.774.000 12.680,000 44,911,000 66,457,000 111,368.000 611,000 572,000 567,000 606,000 701,000 3,057,000 5.096,000 8,153,000 281,000 274,000 308,000 338,000 350,000 1,551,000 1.760,000 3,301.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,893,000 10,473,000 12,623,000 14,643,000 16 840 000 63,372,000 92,299,000 155 671 000 18,029,000 18,849,000 20,562,750 22,911,250 26,001,000 72,507,000 103,277,000 164,806,000 4,875,000 4.902,000 5.392,000 5,931,000 6,524,000 27,424.000 43,810.000 71.234,000 650,000 693.000 717.000 753.000 791,000 3,694,000 4.595.000 8,189,000 4,328,000 5,223,250 6,189,500 7,060,250 7,708,000 30,511,000 38 540 000 69,051,000 9,653,000 10,808,250 12,294,500 13,750,250 15,023,000 61,529,000 88,945,000 148,474,000 8.375,000 9,039,750 8.268.250 9.161,000 10,978,000 16,978,000 16,332.000 16,332,000 4,827,000 5,404,000 6,147.000 6,975,000 7,512.000 7,512,000 9.613,000 9,613,000 1,931,000 2,162,000 2,459,000 2,750,000 3,005,000 3 005 000 3 845 GOO 3,845,000 1 617 000 473,750 1337 760) (464,000) 461 000 461,000 2,974, 000 2,874,000 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10' 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 Single Family Residence User Fee $75 $95 $120 0145 $170 $175 22 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 73,880 73,960 74,090 74,300 74,590 77,090 23 24 Estimated User Fees $5,641,000 $7,025.000 $8,891,000 $10,774,000 $12.680.000 $13,490.750 24 CF2 9LA.XLa a/17/Q Afi PM P c. 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry-over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of I % Tax Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 Ueer Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP•Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19. 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 User Fee Data 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 24 Estimated User Fees 1992-93 Budget Fees Same As 1991-92 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 6117/92 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 R. V.., Tnt.1 8- Vwwr Tntwl 1992.93 1993-94 1994-96 1995-98 1996-97 1992.1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total 28,843,000 27,480,000 28,060,000 28,918,000 31,608,000 26,843,000 35,487,000 28,843,000 9.105,000 9.469,000 9,848,000 10,242,000 10.852,000 49,316,000 60,001,000 109,317,000 2,250.000 2,588,000 2,978,000 3.422,000 3,935,000 15.171.000 30.512,000 45,683,000 15,827.000 19.505.000 22,568,000 26.723,000 30,996.000 114,619.000 165,860,000 280,479,000 1,907,000 1,947.000 1.994,000 2.117,000 2,349.000 10,314.000 15.379,000 26,693.000 522,000 613,000 712.000 801,000 837.000 3,485,000 4.175,000 7,860,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29,611,000 33,122,000 38,098,000 43,305,000 48,789,000 192,905,000 275,927,000 468,832,000 56,454,000 60,802,000 86,158,000 72,223,000 80,377,000 219,748,000 311,414,000 495,675,000 15.789.000 16,558,000 18,214.000 20,035.000 22,039,000 92.635,000 148,005,000 240,640.000 ' 2.099.000 2.204.000 2.314.000 2,430,000 2.552,000 11,599,000 14.810.000 26.409,000 11,080,000 13,780,000 16,712,000 18,150,000 20,299.000 80,027,000 101,222,000 181.249.000 28,974,000 32,542,000 37,240,000 40,615,000 44,890,000 184,281,000 204,637,000 448,298,000 27.480,000 28.060.000 28,918,000 31,608,000 35,487.000 35.487.000 47.377.000 47,377,000 14,487,000 16,271.000 18,620,000 20.300,000 22,445.000 22,445,000 29,499,000 29,499,000 5,795,000 6,508,000 7,448,000 8,123,000 8,978,000 8,978,000 11,800,000 11,800,000 7,198,000 5.281 000 2,850,000 3 177 000 41004,000 4,064 000 8 078 000 6 078 000 $60 $70 $85 $100 $115 $120 263,783 264.358 265,608 267,233 289,533 281.033 $15,827,000 $1a.505,000 $22,588,000 $26,723,000 $30,998.000 $33,723,960 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 CF3 03A.XL9_0/17A2_0:24 PM P8Q* 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Last Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income B Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year is Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19. 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 User Fee Data 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 24 Estimated User Fees COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002 1992-93 Budget Fees Same As 1991-92 C.V.., T..1.1 r..V.., T.f.l 8117192 Page 1 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-98 1998-97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total 34,537,000 36,628,000 38,720,000 39,247,000 39,851,000 34,537,000 38,383,000 34,537,000 11,885,000 12,132,000 12.617.000 13,122,000 13,647.000 03,183.000 76,874.000 140.057,000 1.900,000 2,185,000 2,513,000 2,890,000 3,324,000 12,812,000 25,772,000 38,584,000 16,848.000 18,278.000 21,142,000 24,054,000 26,988,000 107.308,000 179,716,000 287,024.000 2,819.000 2.768.000 2,861,000 2,898,000 2,864,000 14.010,000 15,864,000 29,674,000 506,000 687,000 800,000 915.000 978.000 3,886,000 4,890,000 8,776.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 538 000 36,048,000 39,933,000 43,979,000 47,801,000 201,199,000 302,916,000 504,115,000 69,075,000 72,674,000 78,653,000 83,126,000 87,652,000 235 738 000 341,299,000 538,652,000 16,668,000 17,477,000 19,225,000 21,148,000 23.263,000 97.781,000 158,224.000 254,OOS,000 4,435,000 2,900,000 3.046,000 3,197,000 3.367,000 16,934,000 19.476.000 38,410,000 10,346,000 13,577,000 17,136,000 18,930,000 22.649.000 82,638,000 112 SSO 070 195.588.070 31,449,000 33,954,000 39,408,000 43,275,000 49,269,000 197,353,000 288 650,070 486,003,070 36,826,000 38,720.000 39.247,000 39,851,000 38,383,000 39,383,000 52,648,930 52,648,930 15,725,000 16,977,000 19,703,000 21,638,000 24,635.000 24,035,000 32,170.000 32.170.000 6,290,000 8,791,000 7,881,000 8,655,000 9,854,000 9,854,000 12,888,000 12,888,000 14,611,000 14,9S2,000 11,603,000 8 5S8 000 3,994,000 3,894,000 7,610,930 7,610,930 $60 $65 $75 $85 $95 280,900 281,165 281.895 282,990 294,085 $16.848,000 $18,278,000 121,142,000 $24,054,000 $26.988,000 $145 289,560 $41,988, 200 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 CFa e3A.xLB e/171Y2 s:44 PM Pp. 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19, 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Raserve 21 USER FEE DATA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 1992-93 Budget Fees Same As 1991-92 r—v..• T.t.1 r:.V..• T-1 6117/92 Page 1 1992-93 1993-94 1994.95 1995.96 1996.97 1992.1997 1997-2002 10-Year Toted 8,784,000 10,090,000 11,117,000 11,690,000 11 888 SOO 01784,000 11 938 S00 8,784,000 2.816,000 2,929,000 3,040.000 3.108,000 3,295,000 15,254,000 18,582.000 33.816,000 50,000 58,000 67,000 77,000 89,000 341,000 887.000 1,028,000 1,990.000 2,131,000 2.277.000 2,424,000 2,673.000 11,395,000 15,151.000 26,546,000 668,000 747,000 803,000 831,000 840,000 3,879,000 4,218,000 8,097.000 314,000 124.000 154,000 146.000 131,000 869,000 630,000 1.499.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,828,000 5,989,000 6,347,000 8 848 000 8,928,000 31,738,000 39,248,000 70,986,000 14,512.000 16,079,000 17,464,000 18,338,000 18 814 500 40,522,000 511,184,1300 79,770,000 1,785.000 1,872,000 2.059,000 2,265,000 2.492.000 10.473,000 18,736.000 27,209.000 759,000 797,000 837.000 879,000 923,000 4,195,000 5,352,000 9,547,000 1,978,000 2,293,000 2,878,000 3,305,500 3,463.000 13 917 500 17 316 000 31,232,500 4,522,000 4,962,000 S,774,000 6,449,600 6,878,000 28,585,500 39,403,000 87 988 500 10,090.000 11,117,000 11,890,000 11,888,600 11,938,500 11,938,500 11,781,500 11,781,5D0 2,261,000 2.491,000 2.887.000 3,225,000 3.439.000 3,439,000 4,327,000 4,327,000 904,000 992,000 11155,000 1,290,000 1,370000 1,376,000 1 31,000 1 731 000 6,925,000 7,644,000 7,648,000 7,371,W0 7 121 500 7 121 500 5,723,500 5 723 500 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 22 Single Family Residence User Fee $75 $80 $85 $90 $95 $120 22 23 dumber of Equivalent Dwelling Units 26,533 26,633 20.783 28,933 27.083 27,833 23 24 Estlmsted User Fees $1,990.000 $2.131,000 $2,277,000 $2,424,000 $2,573,000 $3,339,900 24 Al ( CF6_03A.XLS 61171Q2 0:60 PM_P40. 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1%Tax Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste a User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year Is Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 • 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 1992-93 Budget Fees Same As 1991-92 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 8117192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 5 V..r Tne.l 5 VA.. Tnr.l 1992-93 1993.94 1994-95 1996-96 1996-97 1992-1997 1997.2002 10-Year Toted 6,741,000 7,620,000 8,065,000 7,891,000 0,978,000 8 741 000 5,562,000 6,741,000 1.467,000 1.526.000 1,587.000 1.650.000 1.718.000 7,946,000 9,665,000 17,611,000 175,000 201,000 231.000 266.000 306,000 1,179,000 2.375.000 3,554,000 2,784.000 3,002,000 3,224,000 3,447,000 3,071,000 16,128,000 30,025,000 46,153,000 531,000 579,000 688,000 547,000 460.000 2,705.000 1,621,000 4.326.000 32,000 63,000 92,000 114,000 121,000 422,000 570,000 992,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,989,000 5,371,000 5 722 000 6,024,000 6,274,000 28,380,000 44,256,000 72,836,000 11,730,000 12,991,000 13,787,000 13,915,000 13,250,000 35,121,000 49 818 000 79,377,000 2,673,000 2,699.000 2,969,000 3.266.000 3,593,000 15,100,000 24.127,000 39.227.000 301.000 316,000 332.000 349.000 366.000 1.804,000 2.120.000 3,784.000 1,236,000 1 911 000 2 595 000 3,324,000 3,729,000 12,795,000 18.645.000 31,440,000 4,110,000 4,926,000 5,898,000 6,939,000 7,688,000 29,559,000 44,892,000 74 451 000 7,620,000 8,085.000 7,891,000 6,976,000 5,582,000 5,582,000 4,926,000 4,926,000 2,055,000 2,463,000 2,948,000 3,470,000 3,844,000 3,844,000 4,991,000 4,991.000 822,000 985,200 1,179,200 1,387,800 1,537,600 1,537,600 1,998,200 1 996,200 4,743,000 4,616,800 3 783 800 2,118,200 180,400 180,400 12,061,200) (2,061.200) LINE 1 2 3 4 5 a 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 Single Family Residence User Fee $05 $70 $75 $80 $as $170 22 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 42,830 42,890 42,990 43,090 43,190 43,690 23 24 Estimated User Fees $2,784,000 $3,002,000 $3,224,000 $3.447.000 $3,671,000 $7,427,300 24 CF7 93AALS a/17I97 9:58 PM Pme 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 8 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & O 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 24 Eptimated User Fees COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 1992-93 Budget Fees Same As 1991-92 K-VA— Tntwl 5-V—T .twl 6117/92 Page 1 1992-93 1993.94 1994.95 1995.98 1996-97 1992.1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total 13,799,000 17,783,000 21,228,000 23,856,000 25,841,000 13,799,000 27,628,000 13,799,000 4,430,000 4,607.000 4.791.000 4.983.000 5,182.000 23,993.000 29.189.000 53,182,000 840.000 966.000 1,111,000 1.278.000 1.470.000 5,665,000 11,405,000 17,070.000 3.969,000 3,977,000 3,993.000 4,017,000 4,049.000 20,005,000 22.291.000 42,296,000 1.114.000 1,378,000 1,692.000 1.755,000 1.888,000 7,727,000 11,730.000 19,457,000 147,000 124.000 159,000 191.000 199.000 820,000 970,000 1.790.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,500,000 11,052,000 11,648,000 12,224,000 12,788,000 58,210,000 75,585,000 133,795,000 24,299,000 28,935,000 32,874,000 36,080,000 38,629,000 72,009,000 103,213,000 147,594,000 2,798,000 2.933.000 3,226,000 3.649,000 3.904,000 16.410,000 26.214.000 42.624.000 1.588,000 1,667,000 1.750.000 1,838.000 1,930,000 8,773.000 11.198.000 19,971,000 2,130,000 3,007,000 4,042,000 4,852,000 5,167.000 19,198,000 25.835.000 45,033,000 6,516,000 7,607,000 9,018,000 10,239,000 11,001,000 44,381,000 63,247,000 107,628,000 17,783,000 21,228.000 23,856,000 26.841.000 27,628,000 27,628,000 39,966.000 39.966,000 3,258,000 3,804,000 4,509,000 5.120,000 5,601,000 5,501.000 6,959,000 6,959,000 1,303,000 1,5211000 1804,000 2,048,000 2,200,0W 2,200,000 2,783,000 2,783 000 13,222,000 15,903,000 17 543 000 18,873,000 19,927,000 19,927,000 30,224,000 30,224,000 W W W W Soo 99,228 99,428 99,828 100,428 101.228 $3,969,000 $3,977,000 $3,993,000 $4,017,000 $4,049,000 $45 105,228 $4,736,260 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 I . ( 011 03AALS e117102_1005 PM Pqe 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation 5 Foes: Industrial Waste 8 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellanecus Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & O 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19. 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 1992-93 Budget Fees Same As 1991-92 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 6117192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002 5-Venr Tntal _q-Veer Tntwl 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1998-97 1992-97 1997-2002 10-Year Total 112,240,000 13,245,000 13,580,5W 13,293,500 12 827.000 12,240,000 11,860,000 12 240.000 2,652,0GO 2,758,000 2,868,000 2,983,000 3,102,000 14,363.000 17,473,000 31,836,000 280,000 322.000 370,000 426,000 490,000 1,888,000 3.804,000 5,892,000 3,055,000 3,322,000 3,602.000 4,145.000 4,694.000 18,818,000 35,700,000 54,518,000 901,000 946,000 947,000 913.000 862,000 4,569.000 4,570.000 9,139,000 66.000 126,000 15S,000 174,000 181.000 702.000 900,000 1,602,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 954 000 7,474,000 7,942,000 8,641,000 9,329,000 40,340,000 62,447,000 102 787 000 19,194,000 20,719,000 21,522,500 21,934,500 21,958,000 52,580,000 74,307,000 115 027 000 2.809,000 2,943.000 3,237,000 3,561,000 3,917.000 16.467,000 28.307.000 42,774,000 885,000 908,000 953,000 1,001,000 1,051,000 4,778,000 6.100,000 10,878,000 2,275,000 3,287,5W 41,039,000 4,745,500 5,128,000 19,475,000 25 840 000 45,115,000 5,949,000 7,138,500 8,229,000 9,307,500 10,096,000 40,720,000 58,047,000 98 767 ODO 13, 245,000 13, 580,500 13, 293.500 12.627.000 11.860.000 11, 860.000 16.260,000 16, 260,000 2,975,000 3,669.000 4,115.000 4,8S4,000 5,049.000 6,048,000 6,390,000 6,390,000 1,190,000 1,428,000 1,646,000 1,862,000 2,019,000 21019.000 2,556,000 2,556,000 9 080 ODO 8,583,500 7,532,500 61111,000 4,793,000 4,793,000 7,314,000 7,314,000 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 160 $05 $70 $80 $90 $160 22 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 50.910 51,110 51,460 51,810 52,160 53,910 23 24 Estimated User Fees 13,055,000 $3.322,000 $3,602,000 $4,145,000 $4,694,000 $8,625,600 24 CF13 a3A.XL9 e/1719k10:1a PM-P.W I LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Last Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 196 Tax Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 8 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements Is. 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 1992-93 Budget Fees Same As 1991-92 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 0117/92 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pape 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 S-V- Tnlel 5-Veer Tnrwl 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10•Year Total 1,016,000 1,136,000 1,245,000 1,327,000 1,385,000 1,016,000 1,423,000 1,016,000. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 674,000 694,000 704.000 734.000 774,000 3,570,000 4,984.000 8,554,000 76,000 84,000 91.000 96,000 100,000 447.000 515.000 962,000 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7150,000 788,000 795,000 030,000 874,000 4,017,000 5,499,000 9,516,000 1,768,000 1,904,000 2,040,000 2,157,000 2 259,000 S.033.000 8,922,000 10,532,000 429.000 449,000 494.000 543,000 697,000 2,512,000 4,013,000 6,525.000 173,000 182,000 191.000 201.000 211.000 958,000 1,227,000 2.185.000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 140,000 140.000 280,000 630,000 859 000 713,000 772,000 836,000 3,610,000 5,380,000 8,990,000 1,136,000 1.245,000 1,327.000 1,385,000 1,423.000 1,423,000 1,542,000 1,542.000 315,000 330,000 357,000 386,000 418,000 418,000 631,000 631.000 126,000 131,800 142,600 154,400 167,200 167,200 252,200 252,200 695,000 783,200 827,400 844,600 837,800 837,800 858 800 658,800 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 Single Family Residence User Fee $100 0100 $100 $100 $100 $110 22 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 6,740 6,840 7,040 7,340 7.740 11,240 23 24 Estimated User Fees $874,000 $684,000 11704,000 $734,000 $774,000 $1,238,400 24 8117192 CF 938.XLS 2:51 PM LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 17 18 19 20 OPERATING FUND Reserver JL Carry -Over From Lest Year REVENUE Share of 1% Tax Allocation Fees: industrial Waste User Fees Interest tL Miscellaneous Income Tranelar from COP Funds Other Revenue TOTALREVENUE TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING EXPENDITURES Shore of Joint Works M R O Collection System M G 0 and Other Opst, COP Service TOTAL EXPENDITURES Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 20% Contingency Reserve Unepprop or Portion of Insurance Reserve COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 THRU 14 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001-2002 25% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. I992-93 5-Veer Total 5-Year Total Oil 7t92 Pape 1 1992-93 1993.94 1994-95 1995-95 1998-97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Yeer Total 113,590.000 12 2.7 48,000 130,407,250 134,993,750 139,8B3,500 113,590,000 143,789,500 113,590,000 25,645,000 26,672,000 27,739,000 28.849,000 30,005,000 138,911.000 159.023,000 307,934,000 5,896,000 6,780.000 7,797,000 8,967,000 10,313,000 39,752,000 79,980.000 119,732,000 90,835,000 67,812,000 77,a48,000 88,035,000 98,626.000 392,758,000 589,075,D00 981.831,000 8,448,000 9,050,000 9,477,000 9,800,000 10.102,000 48.877,000 58,820,000 105.697,000 1,868,000 2,011,000 2,380,000 2,879,000 2,797,000 11,735,000 13,685,000 25,620,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102,692.000 112.125.000 125,041,000 138,330.000 151,843.000 830,031,000 910,783.000 1,540,814.000 216,282,000 234,871,000 255,508,250 273.323,750 291,728,500 743,821,000 1,054,572,500 1,854.404,000 48,648,000 51,011,000 50,112,000 81.724.000 67,898,000 285,393,000 455,975,000 741,369,000 11,318,000 10,121.000 10,822,000 11,150,000 11,703.000 54,912.000 87.822,000 122,734,DD0 33,572,000 43,271,750 53,780,500 50.556,250 88,336,000 259,526,500 341,112,070 600.638,570 93,536.000 104.403,750 120,514,500 133.440,250 147,937,000 599.831,500 884,910,070 1,464,741,570 122,746,000 130,467, 250 134,993,750 139.883.500 143,789, 500 143,789,500 189, 502,430 189,662,430 45,903,000 51,299,000 59,298,000 85,676,OOO 72,842,000 72,842,000 94,580,000 94,580,000 18,708,000 20,880,000 24,103,800 28,589,2D0 29,587.800 29,587,13D0 38,497,400 38.497,400 58.135,D00 58,288,250 51,803,950 47,518,300 41,359,700 41,359,700 58.585.030 56.505.030 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 Singte Family Residence User Fee 470.13 $77.78 189.04 $100.01 $112.17 1141.86 22 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 844,704 840,374 849,594 854,124 855.809 889,584 23 24 Estimated User Fees, Excludes iRWD 59,235,000 65.812,000 75,848,000 85,935,000 96,426,000 128.199,415 24 CF1 s]A.1rla e11?192 3:21 pm-P.Q. I LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Cerrv-Over From Last Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation 5 Fees: industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTALREVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry-Ovar to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserves 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 24 Estimated User Fee■ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 1 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2D01-2002 25% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 1992.1997 1997-2002 Revised 8113192 Pape t 1992-93 1993-94 1994 95 1995-96 1996.97 5-Year Total 5-Year Total 10-Year Total 9,135,000 8.375.000 8,039,750 8,287.250 9.160,000 9,135,000 10,977,000 9,135,000 1,545,000 1.507,000 1.871.000 1,738.000 1.808,000 8.389,000 10,181,000 18,550,000 400,000 480.000 529.000 608,000 699.000 2,699.000 5,425.000 8,121,000 5.056,000 7.580.000 9.447.000 11,353,000 13,282,000 47,698,000 89.845,000 117,543,000 611,000 572,000 567,D00 508,000 701,000 3,057,000 5.096,000 8,153,000 291,D00 274,000 308,000 338,000 350,000 1.551,000 1,750,000 3,301,000 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 3,893.000 10,473,000 12,522,D00 14,843,000 16,840,000 83.371.000 92,297,000 155.688,000 18,028,000 18.848,000 20,561,750 22 910,250 28,000,000 72,506,000 103,274,000 164,803,000 4,675.000 4,902,000 5,392,000 5,931,000 6,524,000 27.424,000 43.810,000 71,234,000 650,000 683,000 717,000 753,000 791.000 3,594.OD0 4,595.000 8,199,000 4,328,000 5,223,250 8,185.500 7,086,250 7,708,000 30,511.000 38,540,000 69,051,000 9,653,000 10,808.250 12,294,500 13,750,250 15,023,000 61,529,000 88,945,000 148,474,000 8.375,000 8,039,750 8,267,250 9.160,000 10,977.000 10,977,000 16,329,000 16,329.000 4.827,000 5,404,000 0,147,000 6.875,000 7,512.000 7,512,000 9,813,000 9,613,000 1,931.000 2.162.000 2.459,000 2,750.000 3.005,000 3,005,000 3,845,000 3,845,000 1,617,000 473.750 (338,750) 1485,000) 480,000 460,000 2.871,000 2,871,000 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 $81.97 4102.23 1127.51 1152.80 $178.07 $184.49 22 73,880 73,950 74.090 74,300 74,590 77,090 23 /6,056,000 $7,560,000 $9,447,000 671,353,000 613,282,D00 014,222.334 24 CF1 a3AAL3-efille2-2:31 PIA„P-" I LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Last Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1%Tax Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 25% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 Revised 8113192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe f FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2DO2 S- Year Tntet S, Year T.W 1992-93 1993.94 1994-95 1995.96 1998-97 1992-1997 1997.2002 10-Yeei Total 26,843,000 27,479,000 28.060,000 28,920,000 31,811,000 28,843,000 35.491.000 26,843,000 6,828,000 7,101,000 7,305.000 7,080.000 7,987,000 38,901.000 44,988,000 81,969,000 2,250,000 2,598,000 2,978.000 3,422.000 3,935,000 15,171.000 30,512,000 45,683,000 18,103.000 20,874,000 25,032.000 29,288,000 33,662.000 126,957,000 180,878,000 307,835,000 1,907,000 1,947.000 1,995,000 2,117,000 2,349,000 10,315,000 15,383.000 25.698,000 522,000 613,000 712,000 901,000 837,000 3,485.000 4,175,000 7.660,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29,510,000 33,123.000 38,100,000 43,306.000 49,770,000 192.909,000 275,936.000 468,845,000 58,453,000 80,802,000 08,160.000 72,226.000 80,381,D00 219,752.000 311,427,000 495,888,000 15,789,000 16.558,000 18,214.000 20.035.000 22.039,000 92,535.000 140,005.000 240,840,000 2,099.000 2,204,D00 2,314,D00 2,430,000 2,552,000 11,599,000 14.810.000 28,409,000 11,086.000 13.780,000 16.712,000 is. 150,000 20,299,000 80.027,000 101,222.000 181,249.000 28,974,000 32,542,000 37,240,000 40.815,000 44,890,000 184,281,D00 264,037,000 448,298,000 27.479,000 28,060,000 28,920,000 3 1. 61 LOGO 35,491,000 35,491,000 47,390,000 47,390,000 t4,487,000 16,271.000 18,620,000 20,308,000 22,445.000 22,445,000 29,499.000 29,499,000 5.795,000 5,.506,000 7,448,000 8,123,000 8,978,000 8.978.000 11,800,000 11,800,000 7,197,000 5.281.000 21852,000 3,180,000 4.068.000 4,088,000 6,091,000 6,091,000 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 e 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 21 12 Single Family Residence User Fee 988.53 $78.96 $94.28 $109.59 S124.89 1131.54 22 23 Numbar of Equivalent Dwelling Units 263.783 264,358 265.508 267,233 269,533 281,033 23 24 Estimated User Fees $18,103,000 020.874,000 $25.032,000 129,205.000 $33,862,000 438,967.091 24 CF3_63AJLLS_ef17/e1-7:3a PM P.O. 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 -REVENUE 4 Share of I % Tex Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M. & 0 14 Collection System M & O and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 24 Estimated User Fees 25% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 Revised 8/13/92 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002 5-Year Total 5-Year Total 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-95 1996-97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total 34,537,000 36,625.000 38,717,000 39,245.000 39.849,000 34,537.000 38,382,000 34.537,000 8,743,000 9,099,000 9,463.000 9,842.000 10.236,000 47,399.000 57,059.000 105,048,000 1,900,000 2,185,000 2,513,000 2,890.000 3,324,000 12.812,000 25,772.000 38,S84,000 19,763,000 21.307,000 24,297.000 27,334,000 30,400,000 123,101,000 198.930,000 322,031,000 2,619,000 2,768,000 2,881,000 2,898,000 2,864,000 14.010,000 15,664,000 29,674.000 SO5,000 687,000 800,000 915,000 978,000 3,886.000 4,890,000 8,776,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33,537,000 36,048,000 39,934.000 43,879,000 47,802,000 201,198,000 302,915.000 504,113,000 68,074,000 72,871,000 78,651,000 83.124.000 87,651,000 235,735.000 341,297,000 538,860,000 16.669,000 17,477,000 19.225,000 21.148,000 23,263,000 97,781,000 156,224.000 254,005,000 4,435,000 2.900.000 3.045.000 3,197.000 3,357,000 18,934,000 19,476,000 36.410,000 10,346,000 13,577,000 17.136,000 10,930.000 22.649.000 82,838,000 112,950,070 195,588.070 31,449,000 33,954.000 39,406,000 43,275,000 49,269,000 197,353,000 288,650.070 486,003,070 35,625,000 30,717.000 39,245.400 39.849.000 313,382.000 38,382.000 52,648,930 52.648,930 16,725,000 18,977,000 19,703,000 21,538,000 24.635.000 24,635,000 32,170.000 32,170,000 6,290.000 6.791,000 7,881,000 8,655.000 9,854,000 9.854.000 12,869,000 12,868,000 14.610,000 14,949,000 11.661,000 9,558,000 3,893,000 3.893,000 7,608.930 7,608,930 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 $70,38 $75.78 686.19 198.59 1107.01 $159.33 22 290,800 281,185 281,895 282.990 284.085 289,560 23 019,783.000 121,307.000 $24,297.000 127,334,000 $30.400,000 448,135.595 24 Cfe •3A XLe e11?f%2 2:3e PM Pp. 1 LINE I OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 8 User Feee 7 Interest & Miscelfsneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Coilectinn System M & O and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 24 Estimated User Fees COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 5 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 25% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 F-Year TMA 5-Yaar Tnral Revised 8113192 Page 1 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1992.1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total 8,784.000 10 090 000 11,117,000 11,690,000 11,1386,500 9,784,000 11,936,500 8,784,000 2,112,000 2,198,D00 2,284,000 2,375,000 2,470,000 11,437,000 13.916,000 25.353,000 50,000 58,000 67,000 77,000 89,000 341.000 587.000 1,028,000 2,894,000 2,884,000 3.039.000 3,217,000 3,398,000 15,212.000 19,796,000 35,008,000 558,000 747,000 803,000 831,000 840,000 3.879.000 4,218.000 9,097,000 314,000 124,000 154,000 148.000 131,000 889,000 630,000 1,499.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,828,000 5,989,000 6,347 000 6,646,000 8,928,000 31,738 ODO 39,247,000 70 985,000 14.812 000 18,079,000 17,464.000 18,336 000 10,814,50G 40,622,000 51 183 SDO 79,769 000 1385,000 1,972.000 2,059,000 2,285,000 2,492.000 10,473,000 15,736,000 27,209,000 759.000 797.000 837.000 879,000 923,000 4.195.000 5.352.000 9,547,000 1,978 000 2 293,000 2,878 000 3 305 500 3,463,000 13.917,500 17,315,000 31 232,500 4,522 000 4 962,000 5,774 000 6,449,500 6,878,000 28 585 500 39,403,000 67988,500 10,090,000 1 1,1 17,000 11, 690,000 11, 886, 500 11,938,500 1 1.93 8.500 11, 7 80,500 11,780.500 2.261,OD0 2,481,000 2,887.000 3,225,000 3,439,000 3,439,000 4.327,000 4,327,000 904,000 992,000 1,155.000 1,290,000 1,370,000 1,376,000 1,731,000 1,731,000 8,925,000 7.844,000 7,648,000 7,371 500 7,121,500 7,121.500 5,722,500 5,722,500 $101.53 6107.52 1113.45 $1 19.44 $125.46 $155.04 28,533 28,833 28,783 26,933 27,083 27,833 02,694,000 $2,864,000 $3.039,000 $3.217,000 $3,398.000 04.343,081 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 in 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 CFe f3A.ML3 en7n2 2:41 PM Pp* 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Ter Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income e Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & O 14 Collection System M & 0 end Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 24 Estimated User Fees COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002 25% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 5 Yeer Totet S Year Total Revised 8114192 Pape 1 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995.96 1996-97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total 8,741,000 7,620,000 B4O65,000 7,891,000 6,976,000 8,741,000 5,582,000 8,741,000 1,100,000 1,144,000 1,190,000 1,238,000 1,288,000 5,980,000 7,260,000 13,220,000 175,000 201,000 231,D00 266,000 308.000 1,179,000 2,375,000 3,554,000 3.151,000 3,384,000 3.821,000 3,859,000 4,099,000 18,114.000 32,425.000 50.539.000 531,000 579,000 588,000 547,000 480.000 2,705.000 1,618,000 4,323,000 32,000 63,000 92,000 114,000 121,000 422.000 570,000 992,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,989,000 5.371,000 6,722,000 5,024.000 6.274.000 28,380,000 44,248.000 72,628,000 11,730,000 12,991,D00 13.787,000 13.915,000 13,250,000 35,121,000 49,810,000 79,369,000 2.573,000 2,699,000 2.959,000 3,2156,000 3,593,000 15,100,000 24,127,000 39,227,000 301,000 316,000 332.000 349.000 366,0D0 1,894,000 2,120,ODO 3.794,000 1,23B.000 1.911,000 2,595,000 3,324,000 3,729,000 12,795,000 18,645,000 31,440,000 4,110.000 4,926,000 5,896,000 6,939.000 7,888,000 29,559,000 44,892,000 74,451.000 7,620,000 8,065,0D0 7,1191,000 6,978,000 5,562,000 5,582,000 4,131eAo 4,918.000 2,055,000 2,483,000 2,948,000 3.470,000 3,844,000 3,844,000 4,991,000 4.991,000 822,000 985,200 1,179,200 1,387,800 1,537,800 1,537,600 1,996.200 1.996,200 4,743,000 4,615,800 3,783,800 2.118,200 180,400 180,400 (2,069.2001 12,069.200) LINE 1 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 $73.57 $78.91 484.23 489.5e $94.91 M181.88 22 42,830 42,890 42,990 43,090 43,190 43.690 23 $3,151,000 $3,384,000 $3,821,000 $3.859,000 04,099,000 $7,946,337 24 cF7 e3A.xL9 6117192 2:44 PM Pp* 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over Front Last Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Foes 7 Intalast & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Opar. 15 COP Service 15 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Yom 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 7 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 25% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 5-Year Tate! 5-Yeas Total Revised 8113/92 Pape 1 1992.93 1993-94 1994-95 1995.98 1998-97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total 13,799,000 17.783,000 21,228,000 23,856,000 25,841,000 13,799,000 27,829.000 13,799,000 3.323.000 3,458,000 3,594,000 3,738,000 3,888,000 17.999,000 21,904,000 39,903,000 840.000 966,000 1,111,000 1,278,000 1,470.000 5,865,000 11,405,000 17,070,000 5,076,000 5,128.000 6,190.000 5,262,000 6,343,000 25,999,000 29,010,000 54,009,000 1,1t4,000 1,378,000 1,592,000 1,755,000 1,888,000 7,727,000 11.552,000 19,279,000 147.000 124,000 159,000 191,000 199.000 820,000 970.000 1,790,000 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 10.600,000 11.052,000 11,646,000 12,224,000 12,788.000 58,210,000 73,841.000 132.051,000 24,299,000 28,835,000 32,874,000 38,080,000 38,629,000 72,009,000 101,469,000 1413,850,000 2,798,000 2,933,000 3,228,000 3,549,000 3.904,000 16,410.000 28,214.000 42,824.000 1,688,000 1,687,000 1,750,000 1,838,000 1,930.000 8,773,000 11.198,000 19,971,000 2.130,000 3.007,000 4,042,000 4,852.000 5,167,000 19,198.000 25,935.000 45,033,000 8,518,000 7.607,000 9,018.000 10,239.000 11,001,000 44.381.000 63,247,000 107,628,000 17,703,000 21.228,000 23,855,000 25,841.000 27.528.000 27,628,000 38,222,000 38.222,000 3,258.000 3,804,000 4.509,D00 5,120,000 5,501.000 5,501,000 6,959.000 6,959.000 1,303.000 1,521.000 1,804,000 2,048,000 2,200,D00 2.200.000 2,783,000 2,783,000 13,222,000 15,903,000 17,543,000 18,873,000 19,927,000 19,927.000 28,480.000 28.480,000 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1z 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 451.15 $51.58 $51.99 $52.40 152-78 454.95 22 23 Ml mber of Equivalent Dwelling Units 99,228 99,428 99,828 100.428 101,228 105,228 23 24 Estimated User Fees $5,078,000 4S.I28,000 15,190,000 $5,282.000 $5,343,000 $5.782,279 24 CFI t e3A. xL3 a1171i2 2:27 PM PW 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reeervee & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of I % Tart Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 8 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 9 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTALREVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 25% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 5-Year Total 5-Year Total Revised Bf13f92 Pape 1 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1998.97 1992-97 1997-2002 10-Year Total 12,240,000 13,245,000 13.580,500 13,293,500 12,827,000 12,240.000 11,960,000 12,240.000 1,989,000 2,089,000 2,152,000 2,238,000 2,326.000 10,776,000 13,115,000 23,891,000 280,000 322.000 370,000 420,000 490,000 1.8118,000 3,804,000 5,892.000 3,718,000 4,011,000 4,318,000 4,890,000 5,408,000 22,405,000 40,057,000 62,462,000 901,000 948,000 947,000 913,000 852,000 4,569,000 4,570,000 9,139,000 68,000 126,000 155,000 174.000 181,000 702,000 900,000 1,602,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,954,000 7,474.000 7,942,000 8,641.000 9,329.000 40,340,000 82.448.000 t02.788.000 19,194,000 20,719,000 21,522,500 21,934,500 21,958,000 52,580.000 74,306,000 115,028,000 2,809,000 2,943.000 3,237,D00 3,561,000 3,917,000 18.467,000 26.307,000 42,774,000 865.000 908.000 953.000 1,001.000 1,051,000 4,778,000 6,100,000 10,878,000 2,275,000 3,287,500 4,039.000 4,745.500 5,128,000 19,475,000 25,840,000 45,115,000 5,949,000 7,138,500 8,229,000 9,307,500 10,096,000 40,720,000 59.047.000 98,767,000 13,245,000 13,580,500 13,293,500 12.627,000 11.aso, D00 11,860,000 16,259,000 16,259,000 2,975,000 3,569,000 4,115,000 4.854,000 5,048,000 5,048,000 9,390,000 8,390.000 I,190,000 1,428.000 1,646,000 1,862,000 2,019.000 2,019,000 2,556,000 2.569,000 9,080,000 8.583,500 7,532,500 6,111.000 4,793.000 4.793,000 7,313.000 1 7,313.000 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 173-03 $70.48 $83.91 $94.38 $104.84 9177.45 22 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 50,910 51,110 51,460 51,810 52,160 53,910 23 24 Eetimeled User Fees $3,718,000 $4,011,000 $4.318.000 $4,890,000 $5,468,000 49,566,330 24 7114I92Cf 93R.XLS 3:55 PM LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry-Ovet From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Wesle 8 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Furxls 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & O 14 Collection System M & 0 and Oihet Oper, 15 COP Service 18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Unepprop or Portion of Insurance Reserve COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 THRU 14 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001-2002 100% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 5-Year Total 5-Year Total 711419 2 Pape 1 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-98 1996-97 1992.1997 1997-2002 10-Yam Total 113,590,000 122,748,000 130,470,250 134,996,750 139,884.500 113,590,000 143.784,500 113,590,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,895,000 0,780,000 7,797,000 8.967.000 10.313,000 39,752.000 79,980.000 119,732.000 86,483,000 94,285,000 105.387,000 118,892,000 128,625,000 531,682,000 759,571.000 1,291,333,000 8,449.000 9,050,000 9,477,000 9,800,000 10,102,000 46,877,000 58,997,000 105,874,000 1,86B4O00 2.011,000 2,380.000 2,679,000 2,797,000 11.735,000 13,1385,000 25.620,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102,694,000 112,726.000 125,041.000 138.328,000 151,837,000 830.0215,000 912,533,000 1,542,559,000 215,284,000 234.874.000 255.511.251) 273.324.760 291,721,600 1 743.818.000 1,056,317,500 1,656,149,000 48,849,000 51,011.000 56,112,000 61.724,000 67,898,000 285,393,000 4515.976.000 741,369,000 11,316.000 10,121,000 10.622,000 11.150,000 11,703,000 54,912,000 67,822,000 122,734,000 33.572,000 43,271,750 53,790,500 60,568,250 08,336,000 259,528.500 341,112,070 600,638,570 93,530.000 104,403,750 120,514,500 133.440,250 747,937,000 599.831,500 864,910,070 1,464,741,570 122,748,000 130.470, 250 134,996.750 139.884,500 143,784,500 143,784,500 191.407,430 191,407.430 45,903,000 51,299.000 59,288,000 65,676,000 72.842,000 72.842,000 94,580,000 94,580,000 10.708.000 20,BB0,000 24.103,800 28,689,200 29,587,800 29.587,900 38,497,400 38,497,400 58,137,000 58,291,250 51.606,950 47,619,300 41,354,700 41,354,700 58,330.030 58,330,030 LINE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 User Fee Information 21 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 61DO.91 $109.27 1121.69 $134.39 0147.07 4183.49 22 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 844,704 946,374 849,594 854.124 859.609 889,584 23 24 Estimated User Fees, Excludes IRWD 04,083,000 92,485,000 103,387,000 114,792,000 128,425,000 163,232.779 24 CF1 93A.KL9 11Ts»2_11 o13 Ate_rwe l LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves 6 Carry-Ovet From test Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tex Alloceti on 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Feee 7 Interest 6 Miscellaneous Income 8 Traneler From COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M 6 0 and Other Opar. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves d Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserves COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 100% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 1992-1997 1997-2002 Revised 7114193 PAO" 1 1992-93 1993-94 1994.95 1995-96 1996.97 5-Year Total 5-Year TOW 10-Yner Total 9,135,000 8,375,000 8,039,750 8,268,250 9.161,000 9,135,000 10,978,000 9,135,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 460.000 529.000 608,000 699,000 2,696,000 5,425,000 8,121,000 7,601.000 9,167.000 11,119,000 13,091.000 15.090,000 56,068,000 80,028,000 136,096,000 611,000 572,000 567,000 608,000 701.000 3.057,000 5,098.000 8.153,000 281.000 274,000 308,000 338,000 350,000 1,551,000 1,750,000 3,301,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,893,000 10,473,000 12,623,000 14.843,000 18,840,000 63.372.000 92.299.000 155,671,000 18.028,000 18,848,000 20,562.750 22,911,250 26,001.000 72,507,000 103,277,000 164.806,000 4,675.000 4,902.000 S.392,000 5,931,000 8,524,000 27,424.000 43,810,000 71,234,000 650,000 683,000 717,000 753,000 791,000 3,594,000 4,595,000 8,189,000 4,328,000 5,223,250 a,185,500 7,066,250 7,708,000 30,511,000 3R,540,000 69,051,000 9,653,000 10,808,250 12,294,500 13.750,250 15,023,000 61,529,000 86,945,000 149,474,000 8,375,000 8,039,750 8,268.250 9,161,000 10.978,000 10,978,000 1B.332,000 16,332,000 4,827,000 5,404.000 6,147,000 6,875,000 7,512,000 7.512,000 9,613,000 9,613,000 1,931.000 21162,000 2,459.000 2,750,000 3,005,000 3.005.000 3.845,000 3,845,000 1,817,000 473,750 1337,750) 1464.0001 461,000 461,000 2,874.000 2.874.000 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 21 22 Single Family Residence Uear Fee 0102.88 $123.96 6150.07 1176.19 $202.31 5213.02 22 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 73.880 73,950 74.090 74,300 74,590 77,090 23 24 Eelimeted User Fees 17,601,000 19,167.000 111,119,000 $13,091,000 $15.090,000 016.421.712 24 Ci7 e3A. XLS 704rf7 11:34 AM P"e 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry. Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation 5 Fast: Industrlal Waste 6 User Fee■ 7 Interest & Miacelleneous Income 6 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service is TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 User Fee Date 100% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 Revised 7/14/92 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 5- Year Tnrek F. Year Tntal 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-98 1998-97 1992 1997 1997.2002 10-Year Tolal 20,843,000 27.481,000 20,061.000 28,920,000 31,609,000 28,643.000 35,488.000 28,843,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,250.000 2.588,000 2,976,000 3,422,000 3.935,000 15,171,000 30,512,000 45.683,000 24,933,000 27,974,000 32,416,000 36,964.000 41,846,000 1153,933.000 225,862.000 389,795.000 1,907,000 1.947,000 1.995,000 2,117,000 2,349,000 10,315,000 15.379.000 25.894.000 522.000 513,0DO 712,000 801,000 637,000 3.495.000 4,175,000 7,660,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 29,812,000 33,122,000 30,099,000 43,304.000 48,767,000 192.904,000 275,928,000 468,832,000 55.455.000 60,603,000 58,100,000 72,224,000 80,370.000 219,747,000 311,414,000 495,675,000 15,789,000 16.658,000 13,214,000 20,035,000 22.039,000 92.835,000 148,005,000 240,640,000 2,099.000 2,204.000 2.314,000 2,430,000 2,552,000 11.599,000 14,810,000 26,409,000 11,086,000 13.780.000 18,712,000 18,150,000 20.299,000 80,027,000 101,222,000 181,249,000 28,974.000 32,542,000 37,740.000 40,815,000 44,890,000 184,261.000 284.037,000 448,298,000 27,491,000 28.061,000 29,920,000 31,609,000 35.486,000 35.486,000 47,377,000 47,377,000 14.487.000 16,271,000 18.620.000 20,308.000 22,445.000 22,445,000 29,499,000 29.499.000 5,795,000 8,508,000 7.448.000 8,123,000 8,978,000 8,978,000 11,600,000 11,800,000 7,199.000 5.282,000 2,852,000 3,178.000 4.063,000 4,063,000 8,078,000 6.078,000 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 i0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Singte Family Residence User Fee $94.52 1105.82 4122.09 $138.32 1154.51 f 168.11 22 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 263,783 264,358 265,508 267,233 289,533 281.033 23 24 Estimated User Fees $24.933,000 $27,974,000 632,416,400 $36,964,000 141,548,000 446.882.392 24 CFS @3A.xL9 7114rs2 12:13 PM P" 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation 5 Face: Industrial Waste 6 Veer Fees 7 Interest fl, Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 1D TOTALREVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M 6 O 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper, 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves h Carry Over to Nest Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requiramant@ 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 User Fee Data 22 Single Family Reaidence User Fee 23 Number or Equivnienl Owelling Unit@ 24 Estimated User Fees 100% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 Revised 7114192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe I FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002 5-Year Total 5-Year Total 1992-93 1993.94 1994-95 1995-98 1996-97 1992.1997 1997.2002 10 Year Total 34,537.000 36,625,000 38.719,000 39,247,000 39,851,000 34,537.000 38.391,000 34,537,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.900.000 2.185.000 2,513.000 2,890,000 3,324,000 12.812.000 25,772,000 39,584,D00 28,512,000 30,408.000 33,760,000 37,176,000 40,633.000 170.489.000 250.591.000 427.090,000 2.619.000 2,788,000 2,881,000 2,898,000 2.884.000 14,010,000 15,684.000 29,674.000 505,000 697,000 800.000 915,000 978,000 3,886,000 4,890,000 8,776,000 0 o a 0 0 0 0 a 33,537,000 36,048,000 39.934,000 43,879,000 47,799,000 201,197,000 302,917,000 504.114,000 $8.074,000 72.873.000 79,653,000 83,126,000 87,850,000 235,734,000 341,298,000 538,651,000 16,608,000 17,477,000 19,225,000 21,148.000 23,263,000 97.781,000 158.224,000 254,005,000 4,435,ODO 2,900,000 3,045,000 3,197.000 3.357.000 16,934,000 19,475,000 35,410,000 10.348.000 13,577,DO0 17,136,000 18,930,D00 22,649.000 82.838,000 112.950,070 195,588.070 31.449,000 33,954,DOO 39.406,000 43.275,000 49.269,000 197,353,000 288.650,070 488.003,070 36.825.000 38,719,000 39,247,000 39,851,000 38.391.000 39.381,000 52.647,930 52.847.930 15.725.000 18,977,000 19,703,000 21.638.000 24,635,000 24,835,ODO 32,170,000 32,170,000 6,290,000 6,791,000 7,881,000 8.655.000 9.854.000 9,854,000 12.869.000 12,868,000 14,810,000 14,951,000 11,683,000 9,558,000 3,892.000 3,892,0DO 7,609,930 7.809,930 0101.54 0108.15 41 19.76 $131.37 $143.03 0202.34 280,800 291,165 281.995 282,990 284,085 2139,560 /28,512,D00 $30,408,000 $33.760.000 $37,176,000 540,633,000 159,589.570 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 to 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 CT6 e3A_XLS 7114re2 ]'06 PM Pp0 t LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Yeer 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Fes6 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Cnrry-Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 24 Estimated User Fees 100% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 Revised 7114192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Papa 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2001-2002 5 Yeer Total 5-Year Tarot 1992.93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1998-97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total 8.784,000 10,090,000 11,117.000 11,690,000 11,886,500 8.784,000 11,936,500 8,784,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 58,000 87.000 77.000 89,000 341,000 687,000 1.028,000 4.806,000 5,060,000 5,323.000 5.592.000 5,868.000 28,849.000 33.713.000 60,362,000 658.000 747,000 003.000 831.000 840,000 3,879.000 4.218,000 8,097,000 314,000 124,000 154,000 148.000 131.000 869,000 630,000 1,499,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.828,000 5,989,000 6,347,000 6,848,000 6,928,000 31.738,000 39,248,000 70,986,000 14,612,000 16,079.000 17,484,000 18.338,000 18,814,500 40,522.000 51,184,500 79.770,000 1,785,000 1.872,000 2,059,000 2.285,000 2,492,000 10,473,000 16,738.000 27.209,000 759,000 797,000 037.000 879,000 923,000 4,195,000 5,352,000 9,547,000 1,970,000 2,293,000 2.878.000 3,305,5DO 3,463,000 13.917,500 17,315,000 31,232,500 4,522,000 4.962.000 5.774,000 6,449,500 8,878,000 28,585,500 39.403,000 67,988,500 10,090,000 1 1.1 17,000 11,890,000 1 1.8 8 8, 500 11,936.500 11,936.500 1 1.781.500 1 1.7 81, 500 2,261,000 2,481,000 2.887.00D 3,225.000 3,439,D00 3,439,000 4,327.000 4,327,000 904,000 992,000 1,155.000 1,29D,000 1.376,000 1,376,000 1.731.000 1.731.000 8,925.000 7.844,000 7,048,000 7.371,500 7,121,500 1 7,121.500 5.723,500 r 5,723,500 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 0181,13 $189.99 $198,73 1207.63 0216.68 1264.04 22 26.533 28,633 26,783 26.933 27.083 27,833 23 $4,806,000 85,080,000 $5,323,000 15,592,000 15,666.000 $7.349,025 24 CFe_03A.K1.9_71141s2_2:2$ PM Pee. 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reaarvas & Carry -Over From Last Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of t % Tex Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscallaneoue Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper, 15 COP Service 18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year is Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelfing Units 24 Estimated Uenr Fees COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01.2G02 100% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 5 Year Total 5 Yee: Total Revised 7114192 Page 1 1992-93 1993.94 1994-95 1995-98 1996.97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Yeei Total 6,741,000 7,620,000 8,065.000 7,891,000 6,978,000 6.741.000 5,562,000 6.741.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 175,000 201,000 231,000 268,000 306,000 1,179.000 2,375.000 3,554,000 4,251,DOO 4,528,000 4,811.D00 5,097,000 5,387,000 24,074,000 39,690,000 $3,784,000 531,000 579,000 580,000 547,000 460.000 2,705,000 1,621,000 4,326,000 32,000 63.000 92,000 114,000 121,000 422,000 570.000 992,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,989,000 6,371,000 5,722,000 8,024,000 8.274,000 28,380,000 44,256,000 72,636,000 11,730,000 12,991,000 13,787,000 13,915.000 13.250.000 35,121.000 49.810,000 79,377,000 2,573.000 2,699,000 2,969,000 3.266,000 3,593,000 15,100,000 24,127,000 39,227,000 301,000 316,000 332,000 349,000 306,000 1,864,000 2,120,000 3,784.000 1,235,000 1,911,000 2,595,000 3,324,000 3,729,000 12,795,000 18,645,000 31,440,000 4,110,000 4.928.000 5.896,000 6,939,000 7.698.000 29,559,000 44,892,000 74,451,000 7.620.000 8.065,000 7,891,000 8.976,000 5.562,000 5.562,000 4,926,000 4,928,000 2,055,000 2,463,000 2.948,000 3,470,000 3,844,000 3.844.000 4,991,000 4,991,000 822,GGO 985,200 1,779,200 1,387,800 1,537,600 1,537.600 1,996,200 1,996.200 4,743.000 4,618,000 3,763,800 2,148.200 1130,400 180,400 12,061,200) f2,061,2001 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 $99.25 $105.58 1111.91 $118.29 $124.73 0217.77 22 42,B30 42,890 42,990 43,090 43,190 43,690 23 $4,251.000 $4,528,000 44.811,000 15.097,000 15,387,000 $9,514,371 24 LF7_e3A.XLe_71M/e7_3M PMs P.Q. 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1% Tex Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 8 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Opar. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20 % Contingency Reserve 20 Portion Of insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 24 Estimated User Foam 100% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 Revised 7/14192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pape 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 5-Year Tnrsl 5-Yaer Tntal 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995.98 1996-97 1992-1997 1997.2002 10-Year Total 13,799.000 17,783,000 21,228,000 23.856,000 25,841,000 13,799,000 27,628,000 13.799,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 840,000 966,000 1,111,000 1.278,000 1,470,000 5,665,000 11,405,000 17.070,000 8,399,000 8,584,OOO 8,784,000 9,000,000 9,231,000 43,998.000 51.480,000 95,478,000 1.114.000 1.378,000 1.592,000 1,755,000 1,888.000 7,727.000 11,730,000 19,457,000 147,000 124,000 159,000 791,000 199,000 920,000 970,000 1,790,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,500.000 11,052,000 11,646.000 12,224,000 12,788,000 58,210,000 75,585,000 133.795,000 24.299,000 28,835,000 32,874,000 36,080,000 38,629.000 72,009.000 103,213,000 147,594,000 2,798,000 2,933,000 3,226,000 3,549,000 3,904,000 18,410,DD0 28,214,000 42.624.000 1,588,D00 1,687,000 1,750.000 1,838,000 1,930,000 9.773,000 111198,000 19,971,000 211301000 3,007,000 4.042,000 4,852,000 5,167,000 19,198,000 25,835,000 45,033,000 8,516,000 7,607,000 9.018,000 10.239.000 11,001,000 44.391,000 63,247,000 107,828,000 17,703,D00 21,228,000 23,866,000 25,841,000 27.628,000 27,628,000 39,966,000 39,966,000 3,258,000 3,804,000 4,509,000 S.120.0130 5,501,000 5.501,000 6,959,000 5,959,000 1,303,000 1,521,000 1,804,000 2,048,000 2,200,000 2,200.000 2,783,000 2,783,OD0 13,222,DOO 15,903,000 17,543,000 18,673.000 19,927,000 19,927,OD0 30,224,000 30,224,000 684.64 086.33 $87.99 689.62 1191.19 $704.91 99,228 99,428 99,828 100.428 101,228 105,228 $8.399.000 08,584,000 $8,784,000 $9,000,000 49,237,000 011.039.469 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 11 72 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 CF11 s3A.xc3 71141s7 3:$1 PM P" 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Last Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tnx Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & O and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 24 Eelimated User Fees 100% Tax Diversion Fee Adj. 1992-93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 Revised 7114192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002 5-Yenr Total S.Yanr Total 1992-93 1993.94 1994-95 1995-96 1990-97 1992.97 1997-2002 10-Ye at Total 12, 240,000 13, 245,000 13, 580, 500 13,293,500 12,527,000 12. 2 40,000 11, 8 &0,000 12, 240,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 280.000 322,000 370.000 426,000 490,D00 1,888,000 3,804,000 5,592,000 6,707,000 5,080,000 6.470,000 7,128,0DO 7,79B.D00 33,181,000 53,173,000 86,354.000 901.000 946,000 947,000 913,000 862,D00 4,569,000 4570,000 9,139,000 66,000 126,000 155,000 174,000 181.000 702,000 900,000 1,602,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,954,000 7,474,000 7,942,000 8,641,000 9,329,000 40,340,000 62,447,000 102.787,000 19,194,000 20,719.000 21.522.500 21,934,500 21,956.000 52,580,000 74,307,000 115,027,000 2,809,000 2,943,000 3,237,000 3,561,000 3,917,000 18,467.000 26,307.000 42,774,000 865,D00 908,000 953,000 1,001,000 1,051,000 4,778,000 6,100,000 10,878.000 2,275.000 3,287,500 4,039,000 4.745,500 5,128,000 19,475,000 25,840,000 45,115,000 5,949,000 7,138,500 8,229,000 9,307,500 10,096,000 40,720,000 50,047,000 98,767,000 13, 24 5,000 13,580,600 13,293,500 12,627,000 11,860,000 1 1, 860,OD0 10, M,000 16,260,000 2,975,000 3,569,000 4.115,000 4,654,000 5,048,000 5,048,000 6,390,000 8,390,000 1,190.000 1,429,000 1,646,000 1,862,000 2,019,000 2,019,000 2,556,000 2,558,000 9,080,000 8,583,500 7,532,500 6,111,000 4,793,000 4,793,000 7,314,000 7,314,000 LINE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 10 i1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 1112.09 $119.96 $125,73 $137.58 $149,47 $230.01 22 50,910 61,110 51,460 51,810 52,160 53,910 23 $5,707,000 $6,090.000 $8,470,000 t7.128,GOO $7,796,000 $12,399,839 24 r 8/13/92 CF 938.XLS_6:06 PM LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1% Tax Allocation S Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Faas 7 Interest & Miscelienecus Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 'Share of Joint Works M & O 14 Collection System M & O and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Unapprop or Portion of Insurance Reserve 25% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 THRU 14 8/13/92 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 S-Year Total 5-Year Total 1992-93 1993-94 1994.95 1995.96 1996-97 1992-1997 1997.2002 10-Yaar Total 113,590.000 113.880,000 120,940.250 124,728.760 129,848, 600 113.690.000 131,928.600 113,590,000 25,046.000 28,672,000 27,739,000 28,849,000 30,005,000 138,911.000 109,023,000 307,934.000 5,895,000 8,780.000 7,797,000 8,987,000 10,313,000 39,752,000 79,980,000 119,732,000 62,288.000 67,812,000 77.624,000 88,034,000 98,626,000 384,184,000 589.075,000 973,269,000 8,129,000 8,389.000 8,763,000 9.031.000 9,278,000 43,588,000 53,662.000 97.250,000 1,868.000 2,011,000 2,380,000 2,679,000 2,797,000 11,735,000 13.885,000 25,620,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93,826.000 111.464.000 124,303.000 137,560,000 151,017,000 618.170.000 905.625,000 1,523,795,000 207,416,000 225,344.000 245,243,250 262,288,750 279,885,600 731,760,000 1,037,653,500 1,037,385,000 48,648.000 61,011,000 56,112,000 61,724,000 67,898,000 285,393,000 455,978,000 741,369,000 11,316,000 10,121,000 10,622,000 11,150,000 11,703,000 54,912,000 67,822.000 122,734,000 33,572,000 43,271,750 63,780.500 80,566,250 68,336,000 259,526,500 341,112.070 600,038,570 93,536,000 104,403,750 120,514,500 133,440.250 147,937.000 599,831.600 864.910.070 1,464,741,670 113.880,000 120,940, 250 124.728,750 128, 848, 500 131,928,500 131,928,600 172,643,430 172.843,430 45,903,000 51,299,000 69,286,000 66,078,000 72,842.000 72.842,000 94,580,000 94,580,000 18,708,000 20.880.000 24.103,800 26,689,200 29,587,800 29,587,800 38,497,400 38,497.400 49,269.000 48,761,250 41,338,950 36.483,300 29,498,700 ,svuar_=_va-r ::rags_sussrmTnesesrrs�.rvsssetrrsstf.=s�uuuu�:r�statnscnensrssssefsn.�t�sseursu++s:s�r..� 29.498,700 vf.:znnrttuvszr~•s.�vsuuvuvuKvrrruuvrnrr_tr�... 39,566,030 39,566,030 vvuvcsrvusnrseurss LINE 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 Single Family Residence User Fee $60.01 $77.76 $89.01 $100.61 $112.17 $141.86 22 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 844,704 846,374 849,594 854.124 859,609 889,584 23 24 Estimated User Fees, Excludes IRWD 50,688.000 66,812.000 75.824.000 85,934,000 96,426,000 126,199,416 24 .) t CF1 e3A.xtkW17N2_2:24 M Opp 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 8 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service to TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19. 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserves 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 24 Estimated User Fees 25% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 Revised 8/13192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 1992-1997 1997-2002 1992.93 1993-94 1994-95 1995.96 1998.97 6-Year Total 5-Year Total 10-Yee► Total 9,135 000 7,941.000 7,466,750 7,652.250 8,500.000 9,135.000 10 269,000 9,135,000 1.545,000 1.607.000 1,671.000 1,738.000 1,808,000 8,369,000 10.181.000 18,550,000 400,000 460.000 529.000 608.000 699,000 2,696.000 5.425.000 9,121.000 S,541,000 7,560,000 9,447,000 11,353,000 13.282,000 47.183,000 09,045,000 117.028.000 592.000 533,000 526,000 581,000 653,000 2,884,000 4,794,000 7,658,000 281.000 274,000 308,000 338,000 350,000 1,551,000 1,750,000 3.301.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.359 000 10 434,000 12,480,000 14 598.000 16,792 000 62.863 000 91 995,000 154 058.000 17,494,000 18,276,000 19,946,750 22 250.250 25 292,000 71,798,000 102 264.000 163,793 000 4,675,000 4,902.006 5,392,000 5.931,000 6,524,000 27,424.000 43,810,000 71.234,000 650.000 683,000 717.000 753,000 791,000 3,594,000 4,595,000 8,189,000 4,328,000 5,223,250 6,185.500 7,068.250 7,708.000 30 511.000 38,540,000 89 051.000 9,S53,000 10.8091.250 12,294 500 13 750,250 15,023,000 01.529.000 88 045.000 148 474.000 7,841.000 7.466.750 7,852,250 B,Soo,000 10,269,0o0 10.269,000 15,319.000 15,319.000 4,827.000 5.404.000 6,147.000 6.875,000 7,512,000 7.612,000 9,613.000 9.613.000 1.931 000 2,162.000 2,459 000 2,750.000 3.005.000 3.005.000 3,845.000 3.845.000 1.083.000 199,2501 1953.750) 1.125.000) 1248 000) 1 4248,000) 1,861.000 1 1.881.000 $76.00 $102.23 $127.51 $152.80 $178.07 $184.49 73.880 73.950 74,090 74.300 74,590 77.090 $5,541,000 $7,580,000 09,447,000 $11,363.000 $13.282.000 $14,222.334 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Cr2 saAJMs_enu9: 12As P*_PaN r LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collectlon System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES. 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Furling Requirements 19. 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 24 Estimated User Fees COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 25% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 C.- V— Tnfd 1;- Vewr Tnfal Revised 8/13/92 Pays 1 1992.93 1993.94 1994.95 1995-96 1996-97 1992-1997 1997-2002 1 O-Year Total 28,843 000 26 119.000 25,527,000 26,200,000 28.691 000 26.843 000 32,366,000 28 943.000 6.828.000 7.101.000 7.385.000 7,880.000 7,987,000 36.981,000 44,988,000 81.969.000 2.250.000 2,588.000 2,976,000 3.422.000 3,935,000 15.171.000 30,612,000 45.683.000 15,827,000 20.874.000 25,032.000 29,286,000 33,662.000 124,881,000 190,878,000 305,559.000 1.823,000 1,774,000 1.808.000 1,917.000 2.134.000 9,456,000 14,047,000 23,503,000 522.000 613,000 712,000 801,000 837.000 3,495.000 4,175.000 7.660.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27,250,000 32 950.000 37,913,000 43,108,000 40,555,000 109,774 000 274 600.000 464 374.000 54,093,000 58 069 000 63,440,000 88 306.000 77,246,000 218 617,000 308 956,000 491,217,000 15.789.000 16,558.000 18,214.000 20.035.000 22.039,000 92,635,000 148,005,000 240.640,000 2,099,000 2,204,000 2,314.000 2.430.000 2,552,000 11,599,000 14.810,000 26,409,000 11 086.000 13.780.000 16,712,000 19 150.000 20,299.000 80,027,000 101 222.000 181.249.000 28,974,000 32 542.000 37,240 000 40,815,000 44,890 000 184,261 000 264,637,000 448 298.000 25.119.000 25.627.000 26.200,000 28,691.000 32,350.000 32.356,000 42,919.000 42.919,000 14.487,000 16.271.000 18,620.000 20,309,000 22,445,000 22,445,000 29.499.000 29,499.000 5,795,000 6,508,000 7,448,000 8,123.000 8,978 000 9.978,000 11 800,000 11 800.000 4,037,000 2,748,000 132,000 260.000 933 000 933,000 11620,000 1,620 000 $60.00 $78.96 $94.28 0109.59 $124.89 263,793 284,358 265.508 267.233 269.533 $16,827.000 $20,874.000 $25,032,000 $29.286.000 $33,662,000 6131.54 281.033 $38.987,081 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 UkO A%Ls_a/13122_2:02 PM Pp* 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1%Tax Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 8 User Fees 7 Interest A Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & O 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Open. 1S COP Service 18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19. 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion -of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 24 Estimated User Fees COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 25% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 ri-Ywwr Tetel &Vmr Tetad 31- Revised 8113192 Page 1 1992-93 1993-94 1994.95 1995.96 1996-97 1992.1997 1997-2002 10-Year Toted 34.537 000 33,59a,000 35,457,000 35,734,000 38 068.000 34 537 000 34,310 000 34 537,000 8.749.000 9,099,000 9,463,000 9,842.000 10,238,000 47,389,000 57,659,000 105,048,000 1.900.000 2.185.000 2.513,000 2,890,000 3,324,000 12.812.000 25,772,000 38,584.000 16.848.000 21,307.000 24.297,000 27.334,000 30.400.000 120,188.000 198.930,000 319.116,000 2,507,000 2.535,000 2.610,000 2.828,000 2,573,000 12.853.000 13.836.000 28,689.000 506,000 687.000 800,000 915.000 978,000 3.886,000 4.890.000 8,776.000 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,510 000 35 813 000 39,683,000 43.609 000 47 511,000 197 1211000 301.087 000 498 213,000 65,047,000 89,411,000 75 140,000 79,343,000 83 579.000 231 863.000 335.397 000 532,750.000 18.669,000 17.477.000 19.225,000 21,148,000 23,253,000 97,781.000 166,224,000 264.005,000 4,435,000 2,900,000 3.045,000 3.197,000 3.357.000 16,934.000 19.478.000 36,410.000 10,346,000 13,677,000 17 138,000 18,930 000 22 649,000 82,638,000 112,950 070 195 588,070 31,449,000 33 954.000 39,406,000 43,275 000 49,289,000 197 353,000 288'650 070 486 003.070 33.598,000 36,457.000 35.734,000 30,068,000 34,310,000 34,310,000 46.748,930 46,748.930 15,725.000 16.977,000 19.703,000 21,838,000 24,635.000 24,635.000 32.170.000 32,170.000 6,290,000 6,791,000 7 881 000 8,655,000 9.854 000 9 854.000 12,868 000 12 868.000 11,583,000 11.889.000 8,150,000 5.776,000 4179,000) 1179.000) 1700,930 1 1,708,930 $60.00 $75.78 $86.19 $96.59 $107.01 $169.33 280,800 281,165 281,895 282,990 284.085 289.660 $16,948,000 $21,307,000 $24,297.000 $27,334,000 $30,400,000 $46,135,595 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 cFe_s3A.xte s/I3rs3_2:Tf PM -Pace 1 LINE 1 OPERATING ND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & O 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18, Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 24 Estimated User Fees 25% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 Revised 8/13192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 =.V... Tn0.1 wV.., Tnr.1 1992-93 1993.94 1994.95 1995-96 1996-97 1992-1997 1997.2002 10-Year Total 8,784,000 9,360,000 10,334,000 10,849,W 10,983,501) 8,784,000 10,988,500 9,784,000 2.112,000 2.198.000 2.284.000 2,375,000 2.470.000 11,437.000 13.918.000 25.363.000 50,000 58,000 67.000 77,000 89,000 341.000 887,000 1.028,000 1.990.000 2,884,000 3.039,000 3,217.000 3,398.000 14,508,000 19,796.000 34.304,000 632,000 694,000 745,000 789.000 773,000 3,613,000 3,808.000 7,419,000 314,000 124.000 164,000 146.000 131,000 869.000 630.000 1.499,000 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,098,000 5,936.000 6 289 000 8,584,009 6,861,000 30,768,000 30,835,000 69603.000 13,882,000 15,296,000 16,823,000 17,433,000 17,844,500 39.552.000 49,201,500 78,387,000 1,785.000 1.872.000 2,059.000 2,265,000 2,492,000 10.473,000 16,738.000 27.209,000 759,000 797.000 837,000 879.000 923,000 4,195,000 5,352,000 9,547,000 1,978,000 2,293,000 2,978,000 3,305,500 3,483,000 13 917 500 17.315.000 31,232,500 4,522,000 4,982,000 5,774,000 8,449,500 8,878,000 28 685 500 39,403,000 67,988,500 9,360,000 10.334,000 10,849.000 10,983,500 10,966,500 10,066,500 10,398,500 10,399,600 2.261,000 2,491.000 2.887.000 3.225,000 3.439,000 3,439,000 4,327,000 4.327.000 904,000 992,000 1 155,000 1,290,000 1,378,000 1,376,000 1,731,000 1,731,000 8 195 000 8 861 000 8 807 000 81468,500 S.151 ISM 8 151 500 4440,500 1 4,3409500 LINE 1 2 3 4 6 b 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 $75.00 $107.52 $113.45 $119.44 $125.46 $156.04 22 26,533 26,633 28.793 28,933 27.083 27,833 23 $1.990.000 $2,864.000 03.039.000 $3,217.000 $3,398.000 $4.343.081 24 CFe p3AJ Q.8 @1131a3 2A4 PM Pp* 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M S 0 14 Coaactlon System M At O and Other Oper. is COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves d, Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19, 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 24 Estimated User Fees N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 25% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 5 Year Total 5 Year Total Revised 8114/92 Pape 1 1992.93 1993-94 1994.95 1995.96 1996.97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Veer Total 8,741,000 7,239,000 7,655.000 7,450,000 6,501,000 0,741,000 5,051,000 0,741.000 1,100.000 1,144.000 11190,000 1,238,000 1,288.000 5,960.000 7.280,000 13.220,000 175.000 201,000 231.000 268,000 300,000 1.179.000 2,37S,000 3.554,000 2,784.000 3,384.000 3,621,000 3,859.000 4,099,000 17,747,000 32.425.000 50,172.000 517.000 550.000 657.000 613,000 424,000 2,561,000 1,388,000 3,949,000 32.000 63.000 92,000 114.000 121.000 422,000 570,000 992,000 O 0 0 0 O O O 0 4.608 000 5,342,000 5,691,000 5,990,000 8,238,000 27 869.000 44 018,000 71.887 000 11,349,000 12 651,000 13 346,000 13 440 000 12,739,000 34 610,000 48 069.000 78,628 000 2,573,000 2.599.000 2,969,000 3.266,000 3,593.000 16,100,000 24,127.000 39,227.000 301.000 316,000 332.000 349,000 365.000 1.854,000 2,120,000 3,784,000 1,236,000 1,911,000 2,595,000 3,324,000 3,729.000 12 795,000 18 645.000 31.440 000 4,110,000 4,926.000 5,896,000 6,939,000 7,688,000 29.569.000 44 892 000 74.461 000 7,239,000 7.655,000 7.450.000 6.501.000 6,051,000 6.051.000 4,177.000 4,177,000 2,055,000 2,463,000 2,948.000 3.470.000 3,844,000 3.844,000 4.991.000 4.991,000 822,000 985.200 1,179.200 1,387.800 1,637,600 11,537,600 1,996.200 1,998 200 4,362,000 4.208.800 34222,800 1 643 200 1330,600) 1330.600) 12,810,200) 1 (2.810,200) $66.00 $78.91 $84.23 $89.56 494.91 42,830 42.890 42,900 43.090 43.190 $2.784.000 $3,384.000 $3,621,000 $3.859.000 $4,099,000 4181.98 43.690 $7,946.337 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 M 03AXLa_8I13102 5-60 PM -Ps" 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1%Tex Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service is TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19• 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 24 Estimated User Fees COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 25% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 5•Year Total G-Voar Total Revised 8l13192 Page 1 1992.93 1993.94 1994-95 1995.96 1996.97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total 13.799.000 18 636.000 19,997,000 22,535,000 24,423,000 13.799.000 26,106,000 13,799,000 3,323,000 3,456.000 3.594.000 3.738.000 3,888,000 17,999.000 21,904,000 39.903,000 840,000 966.000 1,111,000 1.278.000 1,470.000 5,665,000 11,405,000 17,070,000 3,969,000 5.128,000 5,190,000 5,262,000 5.343,000 24,892,000 28,010,000 52,902,000 1,074.000 1,294,000 1,502,000 1,858,000 1,784,000 7,312.000 10,903,000 18.215,000 147,000 124.000 159,000 191.000 199,000 820,000 970,000 1,790.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,353,000 10 968,000 11.558 000 12,127,000 12,684.000 50,688 000 73,192,000 129,880,000 23,152,000 27.604.000 31,553,000 34.682,000 37,107.000 70.487,000 99,298 000 143,679.000 2,798,000 2,933.000 3.226.000 3.649,000 3.904.000 18,410.000 26.214,000 42,824.000 1,588,000 1,667,000 1,750,000 1,838,000 1,930.000 8,773.000 11,198,000 19,971,000 2,130,000 3,007.000 4,042 000 4,852 000 5,167.000 19,198,000 25,835,000 45,033,000 6.518.000 7,807,000 9.018.000 10,239 000 11,001.000 44,381,000 63.247,000 107.828.000 16,636,000 19,997,000 22,535,000 24,423,000 26,106,000 28,106,000 36.051,000 38,051,000 3,258,000 3,804,000 4.509.000 5,120,000 5,501,000 5,501.000 6,959,000 6,959,000 1,303,000 1521000 1,804,000 2,048.000 2200000 2.200.000 2,783.000 2.783,000 12,075,000 14 672.000 16 222,000 17.255,000 18,40642 18,405,000 26,309,229__j 26,309,000 $40.00 $51.58 $51.99 $52.40 $52.78 99,228 99,428 99.828 100.428 101.228 $3,969,000 $6,128,000 85,190,000 $5,282,000 05,343,000 $54.95 105,228 $5,782,279 UNE 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 1a 19 20 21 22 23 24 CF11 93AALS a/131a2_10:62 AM Pmo 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Last Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation 6 Fees: Industrial Waste 8 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19. 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 24 Estimated User Fees 25% Tax Diversion No Fee adj. 1992-93 Fee adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 Revised 7114192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 &V.., Tnt.1 rV— Tnf.1 1992-93 1993-94 1994.95 1995.96 1998-97 1992-97 1997-2002 O-Year Total 12 240.000 12,558,000 12 843.500 12,502,600 11 777.000 12,240.000 10,947,000 —1 12,240 000- 1.989.000 2.069,000 2.162.000 2,239.000 2,328,000 10,776,000 13,116,000 23.891,000 280.000 322,000 370.000 426,000 490,000 1,888,000 3.804,000 5.692.000 3,056.000 4,011,000 4,318.000 4.990,000 5.468.000 21.742,000 40.057.000 61,799.000 877.000 898,000 893.000 854,000 799,000 4,319.000 4,181.000 8.500.000 681000 126.000 155,000 174,000 181,000 702,000 900.000 1,602.000 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 8,267.000 7,424,000 7,808,000 9,582,000 9,266,000 38 427,000 82 057,000 101,484,000 18 607.000 19.982 000 20 731,600 21,084,500 21 043.000 61 667,000 73,004,000 113 724 000 2,809,000 2.943.000 3,237.000 3,561.000 3.917,000 16.467.000 26.307.000 42.774.000 866,000 908,000 953,000 1.001,000 1.051,000 4,779.000 6,100.000 10.879.000 2,275.000 3.287 500 4,039.000 4,746,500 5.128.000 19 475.000 25,040,000 45,115,000 5,949.000 7.138 500 8,229.000 9,307,500 10,096,000 40 720.000 58,047,000 98,787,000 12.558,000 12,843,500 12,502,500 11,777.000 10,947,000 10,947.000 14,957,000 14.957,000 2,975,000 3,569.000 4.115,000 4,654,000 5,048,000 6,049.000 8,390.000 8,390,000 1.190 000 1,428,000 1 646 000 1,882,000 2,019,000 2,019 000 2,566.000 2 556,000 8,393 000 7 848,500 8,741 500 5 261 LOW— 3,800.000 3,080,000 6 011 000 84011,000 $60.00 $78.48 $83.91 $94.38 $104.84 $177.45 50.910 51,110 61,460 61,010 52,160 63,910 $3,055,000 $4.011,000 $4.319,000 $4,890.000 65,468,000 $9.666,330 LINE 1 2 3 4 S 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 18 17 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 6113192 CF 93B.XLS 9:37 AM LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Cetry-Over from Last Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste a User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds $ Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & O 14 Collection Syetam M ♦4 0 snd Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Unepprop or Portion of Insurance Reserve COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 THRU 14 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002 100% Tax Diversion NO Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 5-Yaar Total 5-Year Torsi 8113102 Papa 1 1992-93 1993.94 1994-95 1996-96 1996.97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total 113,690,000 87,273,000 92,341,250 94.014.750 95,835,500 113,590,000 98,438,500 113,590,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,895,000 6,780,000 7.797,000 8,967,000 10,313,000 39,752.000 79,980.000 119,732,000 52,288,000 94,286.000 105.387.000 116,882,000 128,825,000 497,467,00D 759,671,000 1,257,138,000 7,168,000 8,398,000 6,824.000 6,733,000 6,805,000 33,726,000 38,415,1300 72,141,000 1,889,000 2.011,000 2,380.000 2,679,000 2,797,000 11,735,000 13,885,000 25,620,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67.219,000 109.472,000 122.188.000 136,261,000 148,540,000 582,680,D00 891,99I,DO0 1.474.631,000 180,809,000 196,745,000 I14,629,260 229.275,750 244,375,500 696,270,000 9881389.500 1,588,221,000 48,648,000 61,011,000 56,112,000 61,724.000 67.698,000 286,393,D00 455,978,000 741,369,000 11.316,000 10,121,000 10,622,000 11,150,000 11,703,000 54,912,000 07,822,000 122,734,000 33.572,000 43,271.750 53,780,600 60,566,260 68,336,DOO 259,526,600 341,112.070 600,638,570 93.539,000 104.403,750 120,514,600 133,440.250 147.937.000 599,831,500 864,910,070 1,454,741,670 87,273,000 92.341,250 94,014,760 96,835,500 96,438,500 96,438,500 123,479,430 123,479,430 45,903,000 51,299,000 59,288.000 65,576,000 72,842,000 72,842.000 94,580,000 94,580,000 18.708,000 20,880,000 24.103,8D0 26,689,200 29.587,800 29,587,800 38,497.400 38,497.400 22,662,000 .���„�_s_�__�rr�nrsier_rr_zrrr_zrrrsrs_ti=vvu�.zvinrr.��-r�uwvv,evvusswrn,rs-r�avrrrr__r�_ 20,162,250 10,624,950 3,47D,300 (5,991,300) (5,991,300) rrrnsnnnnarcnnnnnnrvnrr_vrn-.rss-ssr_ 19,597,970) (9,597,970) rr_va�.wu. UNE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 f f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 if 1f 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 11160.01 4109.27 $121.89 6134.39 $147,07 $183,49 22 23 Number of Equivaient Dwelling Units 644.704 1346,374 $49,594 954,124 059,609 889,584 23 24 Estimated User Fees, Excludes IRWD 50,888,000 92,485,000 103,387,000 114,782,000 126,425,000 183,232,779 24 CF1-03A.xi S_afi]n7_Y:6e AM_rq. I LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation G Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income >! Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Col5ection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Yesr's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserves 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 24 Estimated User Fees 100% Tax diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 Revised 7114193 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe I FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 1992-1997 1997-2002 1992.93 1993-94 1994-95 1995.96 1996-97 5-Year Total 5-Year Total 10-Year Total 9.135,000 6,239,000 5,748,750 5,907,250 61519,000 9.135,0()0 8.142.000 9.135,D00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 400,000 460,000 529,000 608,000 699,000 2,896,000 5.425.000 8,121,000 6,541.000 9.157,000 11.119.000 13,091.000 15,090,000 54,008,000 80,028,000 134,036,000 535,000 415,000 399,000 425,000 507,000 21291.000 3,889,000 6,170,000 281,000 274,000 308,000 338.000 360,000 1,551,000 1,750,000 3.301,000 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 5,757,000 10,310,000 12,365,000 14,4a2 O00 16.646 000 80,536.000 91.092,000 151,628,000 15,892,000 16,5S5,000 18,101,750 20,289,250 23,1a5,000 89,671,000 99,234,000 160.763.000 4.575.000 4,902.000 5.392,000 5,931.000 6.524.000 27.424,000 43,810.000 71,234.000 550,000 083.000 717,000 753,000 791.000 3,594,000 4.695,000 8.189,000 4,328,000 5,223,250 8,185,500 7,006,250 7,708,000 30,511,000 38,640,000 69,051,000 9,653,000 10,808,2SO 12,294,500 13,750,250 15,023,000 61,529,000 88,945.000 148,474,000 8,239,000 5,746,750 5,807.250 6.519,000 8.142,000 8,142,000 12,299,000 12,289,000 4,827,000 5,404,000 6,147,000 6,875,000 7,Si2,000 7,512,000 9,613,000 9,613.000 1,931.000 2,162.000 2,459,000 2,750,000 3,005.000 3.005,000 3.845,000 3.845.000 (519,000) 0,819,2501 12,798,7501 13,108,0001 12,375,0001 12.375,DOOI (1,189,0001 11,189,000) $76.00 11 23.96 $150.07 $176.19 1202.31 $213.02 73,090 73,950 74,090 74.300 74.590 77,090 15,541,000 69,187.000 •11,119,000 613.091,000 $15,090.000 618,421.712 LINE 1 2 3 4 6 6 7 8 a To 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 CF2 91AALa el1V92 e:13 AM Pap. 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUNQ 2 Reserves & Cerry-Over From Last Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1% Tax Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Feee 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTALREVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 100% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj, 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 Revised 7114192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2DO2 5- Yaar Total 5- Yeer Tnt.l 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1998-97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total 26,843,000 16.040,000 17,926,000 18,040,000 19,930,000 26,643,000 22,948,000 26,843,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,250,D00 2,588,000 2,978,000 3,422,000 3.935,000 15,171,000 30,512.000 45,883,000 15,827,000 27,974,000 32,418.000 36,964,000 41,646,000 154,827,000 225,882,000 380,689,000 1,572,000 1,253,000 1,260,000 1.316,000 1,490,000 6,883,000 10,044.000 16,927.000 522,000 613,OD0 712,000 801.000 837,000 3,495,000 4,175.000 7,860,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,171,000 32,428,000 37,354,000 42 505,000 47,908,000 180,368,D00 270.593,000 450,959,000 47014,000 50,468,000 55,280,000 50,545000 07.838,000 207,209,000 293,541,000 477,802,000 15,789,000 18,558,000 10,214,000 20,035,D00 22,039,000 92,535,D00 148,005,000 240,840,000 2.099.000 2,204,000 2,314.000 2,430,000 2,552.000 11,599,000 14,810,000 26.409,000 11,086,000 13,780,000 18,712,000 18,150,000 20 299,000 80,027,000 101,222.000 181 249,000 28,974.000 32,542,000 37,240,000 40,615,D00 44,890,D00 194,261,000 264,037,000 448,298,000 18,040,0D0 17.920,000 18,040,000 19,930,000 22,948,000 22,948,000 29,504,000 29,604,000 14,467,000 18.271,000 18,820,000 20,308.000 22,445,000 22.445,000 29,499.000 29,499,000 5,795,000 8,508,000 7,449,000 8,123,000 8,978,000 8,978,D00 11,800.000 11,800.000 12,242,0001 (4,853,0DM (8,02B4O001 18,501,00M (8,475,000) (8,475,ODO) (11,795.000) (11,795,0001 LINE 1 2 3 4 6 e 7 8 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 180.00 8105.82 $122.09 $138.32 6154.51 $186.1 1 22 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 263,7B3 264.358 255,508 267,233 269,533 281,033 23 24 Estimated User Fees 115,827,000 $27,974,000 132,416,000 $36,984,000 $41,645,000 846.882.392 24 CF7 s3A.xLs ef131s3 sa■ AM Ppr t LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves G Carry,Over From Lost Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellenenus Income 8 TTansfar from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M 6 0 14 Collection System M i 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves 6 Carty -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Rasidence User Fee 23 Numbar of Equivalent Dwelling Units 24 Estimated User Fees 100% Tax Diversion NO Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 Revised 7l14192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pape 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992,1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 5-Year Total 5-Year Total 1992-93 1393.94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total 34,537,000 24,512.000 25,813,000 25,196,000 24,719,000 34,537,000 22.084,000 34,537,000 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 1,900,000 2.185,000 2,513.000 2,890,000 3,324,000 12.812,000 25,772,000 39,584.000 16.848,000 30,408,000 33.750,000 37,178,000 40,633.000 158,925.000 250,591,000 415,419.000 2,170.000 1.835,000 1,858,000 1.817,000 1,899,000 9.377,000 8,345,DDO 17.722,000 608,000 607,000 800,000 915,000 978,000 3,888,000 4,990,000 8,77e,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21,424.000 35,115,000 39,929,000 42,798,D00 46,634,000 184.900,000 295.598,000 480.498,000 55,961.000 69,827,000 84,602,000 67,994,000 71,353,000 219,437,000 317,882,000 515,035,000 15,668,000 17,477.000 19,225,000 27,14B4O00 23.283,001) 97.781,000 155,224,000 254,005.000 4,435,000 2,900,000 3,045,000 3,197.000 3.357.000 15.934,000 19,478,000 35.410.000 10,348,000 13,577,000 17,136,000 18,930,000 22,849,000 82,638,000 112,950,070 195,588,070 31.449.000 33,954,000 39.406,000 43,275,000 49,269,000 197,353,000 288,650,070 486,003.070 24,512,000 25,673,000 25,196.000 24,719.000 22.084,000 22,084,000 29,031,930 29,031,930 15,726,000 16,977.000 19.703,000 21,038,000 24.035,000 24,635.000 32,170.000 32,170.000 8.290.000 8,791,000 7,881,000 8.655,000 9,854,000 9.854,000 12,868,000 12,888.000 2,497.000 1,905.000 f2,388,0001 (5,674.0001 f12,405,0001 112,405,0001 118,008,0701 (18.006,070) $60.00 9108.15 200,800 281,105 118,848,000 $30.408.000 $118.78 $131.37 1143.03 281,895 202,990 284,085 $33.700.000 137,176,000 $40.833,000 0 202.3 4 289,660 IISS.589,570 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 a 7 8 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 CF6 a3A.XLa_af1"2 e:22 AAr Pp" 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves 6 Carry,Over From Lost Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 8 User Fees 7 Interest 6 Wocellansou■ Income e Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M 6 0 14 Collection System M i 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry Over to Next Year is Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 100% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 Reviaad 7114/92 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002 S-Vwwr 7nrw1 SVwwr Tnrwt 1992-93 1993.94 1994-95 1995.98 1996.97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Yesr Total 8,794,000 7,170,OD0 7,983,000 8,328,000 8,274,500 8,784,000 8,058,500 8,784.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 50,000 58,000 67,000 77,000 69,000 341,000 687,000 1.028,000 1,990,OD0 5,060.000 5.323,000 5,592,000 5.868,000 23,833,000 33,713,DDO 57.546,000 S54,000 533,000 573,000 583.000 574,000 2,817,000 2.567.000 5,384,000 314,000 124,000 154,000 148,000 131,000 869.000 830,000 1,499.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,908,000 5,775,000 6,11T 000 6,398,000 6,682,000 27.B80.OD0 37.597.000 65,457,000 11,69I,000 12,945,000 14,100,000 14724,000 14,936,500 38.544,000 45,855,500 74,241000 1.796.000 1.872,000 2.059,000 2,285,000 2,492,ODO 10,473.000 18,736,000 27,209,DOD 759,000 797.000 $37.000 879,000 923,000 4.195,000 5,352,000 9,547,000 1,979,D00 2,293,000 2,878,D00 3 305,500 3,483,ODO 13,917,5DO 17,315,OD0 31,232,S00 4,522,000 4,982,000 5,774,000 8,449,500 8,878,000 28,585,5DO 39,403,000 67 988,500 7,170,000 7,983,OD0 8,326,000 8,274,500 6,058,500 8,058,600 6,252,600 8,252,SDO 2,261,000 2,481.000 2,887.000 3.225,000 3.439,000 3,439.000 4,327,000 4,327,000 904,000 992,000 1,155,000 1,290,000 1,378,000 1,378,000 1,731,000 1,731,000 4,006,000 4,510.000 4,284,000 3.759,500 3,243,500 3,243,500 194,500 1194,500 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 Single Family Residence User fee $75.00 6189.98 $198,73 $207.63 0216.06 4264.04 22 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 26,533 28,033 26,783 26,933 27,083 27,833 23 24 Estimated User Fees $1,990,000 15,060,D00 95,323.000 65,592,000 15,888,000 87,349,025 24 CFe_93A.xl9J113/92 e:2e AM P.e. r LINE 1 OPERATING _ --ING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Last Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of 1 % Tax Altocetion 5 Fees: Industrial Wavle 6 User Fees 7 interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & O and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Urtits 24 Estimated User Fees 100% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 6 Revised 7/14192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002 S Yeer Total 5 Year Tnt,J 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-90 1996-97 1992.1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total 6,741,000 6097,000 6,425,000 6,125,000 5,074,000 6,741,000 3,514,000 6.741,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 175.000 201,000 231,000 288,000 306,D00 1.179,000 2,375,000 3,554,000 2,784,000 4,528,000 4.911,000 5,097.000 5,387,000 22,907,000 39,690,000 82,297,000 475,DO0 452,000 462,000 411.D00 314,000 2,124,000 700.000 2,824.000 32,000 53,000 92,000 114,DD0 121.D00 422,000 570.000 992,D00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,466,000 5,254,000 5,596,000 6,888,000 6,128,DD0 28,332,000 43,335,000 69,887,000 10,207,000 11,351,000 12,021,000 12,013,D00 11,202,000 33,073,000 48,849,000 76.408,000 2,573,000 2,899,000 2,969,000 3,206,000 3,593,000 15,100,000 24,127,DDO 39,227,000 301,000 318,000 332,000 349,000 366,000 1.664,000 2,120.000 3,784,0D0 1,236,000 1,911,000 2.595,000 3.324.000 3,729,000 12,795,000 18,845,000 31.440.000 4,110,000 4,920,000 5,898 DOO 6,93.9,000 7,688,000 29,559,000 44,892,000 74,461,000 6.097,000 8,425,000 8,125,000 5,074,000 3,514,000 3.514.000 1,957,000 1,957.000 2,055,000 2,483,000 2,948,000 3,470,D00 3,844.000 3,844,000 4.991.000 4,991,000 822,000 985.200 1,179,200 1,387,800 1,537 800 1,537,600 1,998,200 1,990,200 3,220,000 2,976,800 1,997,800 216,200 (1,887,600) 1.1,867,800) (5,030,200) (5,030,200) LINE 1 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 • 21 165.00 1105.58 1111.91 $119.29 $124.73 $217.77 22 42,830 42,890 42,990 43,090 43,100 43,590 23 12.784.000 $4,528,000 14,911,000 $5.097.000 05.397.000 $9.514,371 24 CF7-e3A.xLa 4113A2 9:2s AM Pq 1 LINE 1 OPERATING FUNQ 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Share of I % Tex Allocation 6 Face: Industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest 6 Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Share of Joint Works M & 0 14 Ccilection System M & 0 and Other Oper. 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Pardon of insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 24 Eetimated User Fees 100% Tax Diversion No Fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 7 Revised 7114192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 S-Ywer Tnsnl 5-Year T.W 1992.93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-98 1996.97 1992-1997 1997.2002 10-Year Total 13,799,D00 13,190.000 16,298,000 18,564,000 20,160,000 13,799,000 21,530,000 13,799,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 840,000 986,000 1,111,000 1,278,000 1,470,000 5,666,000 11.405,000 17,070.000 3,969,000 8,584,000 8,78 4,000 9,000,000 9,231,000 39,568.000 51,490,000 91,048,000 951,000 1,041,000 1,230,000 1,366,000 1,471,000 8,059,000 9,134,000 15,193,D00 147,000 124,ODO 159,000 191,000 199,000 920,000 970,000 1,790,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,907.000 10,715,000 11.284,000 11,935,000 12.371.000 52,112,000 72,989,000 125,101,000 19,706,D00 23,905,000 27.582.000 30,399,000 32,531,000 05.911,000 94,519.000 138,900,000 2.798.000 2,933,000 3,226,000 3,549,000 3,904,000 18,410.000 26,214,000 42,824,000 1,588.000 1,867.000 1,750,000 1,838.000 1,930,000 8.773.000 11,198,000 19.971,000 2,130,000 3,007.000 4,042,000 4,852,000 5,167,000 19,198,000 25,835,000 45,033,000 6,516,000 7,607,000 9,018,000 10,239,000 II'DO1,000 44,381.000 63,247,000 T07,828,000 13,190,000 18,298,000 18,564,000 20,160,000 21,530,000 21,630,000 31,272,000 31,272,000 3,258,000 3,804,000 4,509,000 5,120,000 5,501,000 5,501,600 8,959,000 8,959,000 1,303,000 1,521,000 1.804,000 2,048,000 2,200,000 2,200,000 2,783,000 2,783,000 6,629,000 10,973,000 12,251,000 12,992,000 13.829,000 13,829,000 21,530,000 21,530,000 140.00 $88.33 $87.99 $89.62 $91-19 $104.91 99.228 99,428 99,828 100,428 101,228 105,228 $3,969,000 18,584,000 18,784,0DO $9,000,000 $9,231.000 111,039,469 LINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 M 19)A.xt9_e113raz e:5I1 AM Prq I LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year 3 REVENUE 4 Shete of 1 % Tex Allocation 5 Fees: Industrial Waste 6 User Fees 7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income 8 Transfer from COP Funds 9 Other Revenue 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12 EXPENDITURES 13 Shete of Joint Works M & 0 14 Collection System M & O and Other Oper, 15 COP Service 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17 Reserves & Carry-Ovat to Next Year 18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements 19 20% Contingency Reserve 20 Portion of Insurance Reserve 21 USER FEE DATA 22 Single Family Residence User Fee 23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 24 Estimated User Fees 100% Tax Diversion No fee Adj. 1992-93 Fee Adj. 1993-94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 Revised 7114192 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 5Neer Tarel 5-Yaer Toral 1992.93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-95 1996-97 1992.97 1997-2D02 10-Year Total 12,240,000 10,496,000 10.829 500 10,125,500 9,226,000 12.240,000 8,209,000 12,240.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 322,000 370,000 426,000 490,000 1,889,000 3,804,000 5,692,000 3,055,000 6,080,000 6,470,400 7,128,000 7,796,000 30,529,000 53,173,0D0 83,702,000 904,000 744,000 730,000 600,000 612,000 3,570,000 3,017,000 6,587,000 66,OD0 126,000 155,000 174.000 181,000 702,000 900,000 1,602,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,205,000 7,272r000 7,725,000 8,408,000 9,079,000 38,689,000 80,894,000 97,583,000 16,445,000 17,768,000 18,354,500 18,533.500 18,3135,000 48,929,000 159.103,000 109,823,000 2,809,000 2,943,000 3,237.t100 3,561,000 3,917,000 16.467.000 28.307.000 42.774,000 865,000 908,000 953,000 1,001.000 1,051,000 4,778,000 8.100,D00 10,878,000 2,275,000 3,2137,500 4,039,000 4,745.500 5,128.000 19,475,000 25,640,000 45.115,000 5,949,000 7,138,500 8,229,000 9,307,500 10,096,000 40,720,000 58,047,000 98,767,000 10,496,000 10,829,500 10,125,500 9,228,000 8,209,000 8,209,000 11,056,000 11,056,000 2,975,000 3.569,000 4,115,000 4,654,000 5,048,000 5,048,000 6,390.000 8,390.000 1,190,000 1,428,000 1.646,000 1,862,000 2.019,ODO 2,019,000 2,556,000 2,556,000 6,331.000 5,532,500 4,364,500 2,710,000 1,142,000 1,142,000 2,110.000 2,110,000 LINE 1 z 3 4 5 6 7 9 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 1160.00 0118.96 $125.73 0137.58 $149.47 $ 230.01 22 50,910 51,110 61,460 51,810 52,160 63,910 23 43,055,000 $6,080,000 $6,470.000 117,128,000 97,798,000 $12.399,839 24 SELECT COMMITTEES ; •ti •.. P`C6pp —1'-• CHAIRMAN. (�W�' 1Y� PLANNING FOR pC CALIFORNIA'S GROWTH INFANT AND CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT SOURCE REDUCTION AND -ECYCLING MARKET •" ' -ELOPMENT hC'! lIs OAKy4E Cariforniar 6tarte *cnate MARIAN BERGESON SENATOR THIRTY-SEVENTH DISTRICT CHAIRMAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE September 1, 1992 Mr. William D. Mahoney, Chairman County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Dear Mr. Mahoney: STANDING COMMITTEES: CHAIRMAN. 4OCAL GOVERNMENT APPROPRIATIONS ELECTIONS & REAPPORTIONMENT HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES TRANSPORTATION Thank you for your recent letter to my Capitol office regarding your Board's opposition to the elimination of all property tax revenues for Enterprise Special Districts. As you well know, this would be a significant impact on these districts. It means, as you pointed out, that all affected districts would have to cut administrative costs and/or raise rates dramatically to compensate for the loss. It is for this reason that I was unable to support Assembly Bill 3214 (Isenberg). I understand why the Governor has chosen to look at enter- prise districts which continue to receive tax funds. Following the passage of Proposition 13 and the enabling legislation, Assembly Bill 8, certain districts were subsidized by local property taxes. However, many enterprise districts do not receive property taxes; their customers already pay the full price of their services through rates and fees. In effect, customers of the affected enterprise districts such as myself are subsidized in relation to other district customers. At some point in time, I agree that it would be reasonable to look at an appropriate approach to resolving this fundamental inequity. I believe it is important to delay any consideration of enterprise districts until we have a clearer understanding of fundamental tax issues. Then, as we investigate opportu- PITOL OFFICE STATE CAPITOL. SACRAMENTO. CA 95814 TELEPHONE, 1916) 445-4961 ORANGE COUNTY 140 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE- SUITE 120. NEWPORT REACH. CA 9266D TELEPHONE-. 47141 640-1137 .. WESTERN RIVERSIDE! 27403 YNEZ ROAD. SUITE 217. TEMECULA. CA 92390 TELEPHONE: {7141 676-6808 NORTHEASTERN SAN DIEGO COUNTIES -z- nities to improve the system, we must make transitions slowly. In my view, it would be important to include members of the affected enterprise districts in these discussions. You mention the "super -pot" proposal which would eliminate all property tax revenues of special districts and transfer them to a Super Special District Augmentation Fund. I do not support that approach and continue to believe that Senator Farr's amendments provide a much better solution. Thank you for taking the time to provide me with your perspective on the issue. It is always most helpful to hear from affected agencies. I look forward to continuing to work with you and other members of the water and sanitation boards on matters of mutual concern. Cordially, ;';7 MARIAN BERGE50N senator, 37th District MB:hvk September 1, 1992 Pricing Book for: County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 39 69 7 & 11 of Orange County, California $9815009000 Certificates of Participation Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Series C �'A � � Merrill hynch Mo $98,5009000 County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 & 11 ,MO./ of Orange County, California 1990-92 Series C Pricing Book Table of Contents to Summary of Financing . . . . . . . . . . . 1 WW Financing Team . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Financing Calendar . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Marketing Materials 4 �. New Issue Calendars 5 - Transaction Structure . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Historical Program Rate Performance 7 News Articles . . . . . . . . 8 Closing Memo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 no ow tow UW I.W/ UW 42 The County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 & 11 of Orange County (the Districts) negotiated the sale of $98,500,000 Certificates of Participation (Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Series C) on Tuesday, September 1, 1992. Merrill Lynch & Co. served as the Districts' underwriter, while Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon and Rourke & Woodruff served as the Districts' co -special counsel. The issuance was backed by a Standy Bond Purchase Agreement provided by Federal Guaranty Insurance Company Securities Purchase, Inc., as well as Municipal Bond New Issue Insurance provided by Federal Guaranty ,r Insurance Company. The ratings assigned to the issue are accordingly the same as the ratings of the Liquidity Facility provider: AAA/A-1+ by Standard & Poor's Corporation, and Aaa/VMIG 1 by Moody's Investors Service. The proceeds from this financing are being used to finance the cost of acquisition and construction of various projects, which consist of certain jointly owned sewage treatment and disposal facilities and certain trunk sewer lines owned by Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 11. Additional proceeds will be used to reimburse the participating Districts for the cost of individually owned trunk sewer lines and jointly owned sewage treatment and disposal facilities. tow Based on current market conditions, the pending California State budget and subsequent note issuance, and the Districts' need for capital, the finance team chose to implement a variable rate financing and selected kEW Tuesday, September 1 as the date to price and sell the Districts' certificates. A variable rate transaction was determined to be beneficial for several reasons. First, the steepness of the yield curve in recent years has been such that a significant advantage exists between current short-term rates and long-term rates. Close monitoring of the Districts' Series A issuance reveals this trend as the issue has continuously "" performed below even very attractive long term fixed rates (see Tab 7). Secondly, while there has been some flattening of the yield curve in recent months due to Federal Reserve eases and attempts in Washington to stimulate the economy, the difference between short-term and long- term rates is still significant enough to warrant the variable rate structure. Before finalizing the financing structure, the Districts weighed all options and approached the rating agencies to ensure that the Districts' underlying ratings would not be adversely effected should a variable rate structure be decided upon. To the t� f contrary, Moody's Investors Service upheld the Aa rating assigned to the Districts in 1990, while Stand & Poor's Corporation upgraded the Districts by an impressive two notches, from A to AA-. In addition to rating agency considerations, the Districts examined the arbitrage benefits of traditional versus synthetic variable rate debt. Ultimately, the financing team recognized the benefits associated with short-term debt and developed a financing plan based on several premises: Because the Districts spend proceeds in less than two years, monies set aside for construction are free from certain arbitrage restrictions. Therefore, by investing the proceeds in taxable instruments while concurrently paying tax-exempt rates, the Districts recognize an arbitrage benefit which could not be achieved through the issuance of fixed rate debt. Should the Districts choose to lock -in low long- term fixed interest rates at some later date, a provision exists for the Districts to convert their variable rate certificates to fixed rate certificates. Such a scenario has been developed for Series A. The net result is arbitrage benefit during construction, while capitalizing on attractive fixed rates if the Districts recognize this as an opportunity at some later date. M+ Finally, the Districts' reserves were viewed as a natural hedge against a certain amount of variable rate debt. Accordingly, the cost of the Districts' variable rate debt should move in tandmem with the Districts' earnings on invested reserves locking in a predictable spread between the two. tud Preliminary Marketing for the Districts' issue began during the week ending August 28, 1992 with the mailing of the District's disclosure document, the Preliminary Official Statement (P.O.S.), to over 120 institutional buyers. Merrill Lynch also mailed internal marketing materials to its network of over 300 'mod institutional Financial Consultants around the nation. Concurrently, the Merrill Lynch short-term underwriting desk began to solicit interest for the upcoming offering among institutional investors. Daily Rate issues, which have a minimum denomination of $100,000 and for which the interest is reset on a daily t.W basis, are typically sold primarily to institutional investors such as tax-exempt money market funds and bank trusts. kwjl-.. Merrill laynch eel On Monday, August 31, Merrill Lynch began preliminary pricing of the Districts' certificates. It was agreed that a preliminary pricing rate of 2.70% would be established as the rate matched the rate of the Districts' -MOO, Series A certificates on August 31. While rates have remained relatively constant for the last several weeks, it is anticipated that should the California State Legislature approve a budget this week, the State's $1.5 billion of notes could enter the market immediately. Given the sudden increase of tax-exempt daily paper, there may be some fluctuation in the Districts' rates as the market attempts to absorb the influx of supply. .■ Closing for the Districts' issuance occurred on Tuesday morning, September 1, at the offices of Mudge Rose in Los Angeles. Members of the finance team were present with Patti Gorczyca representing the Districts. Merrill Lynch confirmed the initial rate at 2.70%. At approximately 8:00 a.m. PST, Merrill no Lynch sent the net purchase price of the certificates by wire transfer to the Districts' Trustee bank for the transaction, State Street Bank & Trust Company of California, N.A. Merrill hynch I - am y �Merri116yncle WW $98,500,000 County Sanitation Districts Nos.1, 2, 3, 6, 7 & 11 of Orange County, California Certificates of Participation Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Series C Issuer County Sanitation Districts of Orange County taw 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 wo Gary G. Streed (714) 962-2411 (x2500) Patricia M. Gorczyca (714) 962-2411 (x2504) FAX: (714) %2-3954 too Co -Special Counsel Rourke & Woodruff 701 So. Parker Street, Suite 600 Orange, CA 92668 ,ad Alan R. Watts (714) 558-7000 FAX: (714) 835-7787 tffld Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon 333 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 2020 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Edward W. Long (213) 613-2301 Carolyn Clark (213) 613-2342 Brant Freer (213) 613-2309 FAX: (213) 680-1358 �'�►`� Underwriter Merrill Lynch & Co. 400 S. Hope Street, Suite 2020 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Stephen R. Coma (213) 683-4696 Melissa Waters (213) 683-4625 FAX: (213) 683-4514 Underwriter's Counsel law Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 777 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3200 Los Angeles, CA 90071 45V Eugene Carron (213) 612-2405 Brian Whitley (213) 612-2350 FAX: (213) 612-2499 M+ Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 599 Lexington Avenue, 29th Floor New York, NY 10022 too Leon J. Bijou (212) 326-8876 FAX: (212) 326-8900 Trustee `sd State Street Bank & Trust Company 725 S. Figueroa St., Suite 3100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Steve Rivero (213) 362-7345- FAX: (213) 362-7357 As of 8/28/92 Trustee's Counsel Morrison & Foerster 611 Anton Boulevard, 9th Floor Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Andrew Bernstein (714) 251-7500 FAX: (714) 251-0900 Insurer Financial Guaranty Insurance Company 175 Water Street New York, NY 10003-4972 John Van Cott (212) 607-3070 FAX: (212) 607-3093 Other Brown & Wood One World Trade Center, 59th Floor New York, NY 10048 Micheal Kohler (212) 839-5306 FAX: (212) 839-5599 Rating Agencies Moody's Investors Service 1 Sanssme Street, 31st Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Mark Campa (415) 274-1711 FAX: (415) Moody's Investors Service 99 Church Street, 9th Floor New York, NY 10007 Karen Krop (212) 553-4860 FAX: (212) 553-4919 or (964-6038 Standard & Poor's Corporation 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2485 San Francisco, CA 94104 John Costagliola (415) 765-5007 FAX: (415) 433-7839 Standard & Poor's Corporation 25 Broadway, 21st Floor New York, NY 10004 Phil Edwards (212) 208-1851 FAX: (212) 412-0432 kw As of 8/26/92 No $98,500,000 �+ County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3,6,7 & 11 of Orange County, CA (Capital Improvement Program 1990-92, Series Q Financing Schedule April 1992 May 1992 June 1992 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 �+ 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 27 28 29 30 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 too Date Event Responsibilities MW 03/09/92 - Initial meeting to discuss financing structure CSDOC, ML&CO. 03/16/92 - All -hands meeting to discuss legals and determine All Parties ,o preliminary structure 03/17/92 - Begin meeting with potential LOC Banks CSDOC, ML&CO. tow 04/08/92 - Fiscal Policy Committee packages mailed CSDOC, ML&CO. 04/13/92 - Rating Agency presentation review CSDOC, ML&CO. 04/15/92 - Fiscal Policy Committee meeting CSDOC, ML&CO. 04/16/92 - Review revised Rating Agency presentation CSDOC, ML&CO. 04/20/92 - Rating Agency presentation dress rehearsal CSDOC, ML&CO. 04/22/92 - On -site presentation to Moody's All Parties 04/23/92 - On -site presentation to Standard & Poors All Parties 04/28/92 - All -hands meeting to review structure CSDOC, ML&CO. 05/07/92 - Meeting with Nat West to review structuring options CSDOC, ML&CO. 05/08/92 - Letter of Credit RFP sent out ML&CO. - Trustee RFP sent out 05/13/92 - Fiscal Policy Committee packages mailed CSDOC, ML&CO. ,ow 05/18/92 - Comments back from Rating Agencies All Parties 05/20/92 - Fiscal Policy Committee Meeting (Informational) 05/25/92 - Variable rate documents distributed BC - Draft of variable rate POS distributed ML, UC - Commitment Letter Consent Determination UC, KPMG 05/29/92 - Credit Enhancement & Trustee RFPs received CSDOC, ML - Review variable rate documents All Parties 06/03/92 - Board workshop for historical COP CSDOC, ML, Board tw overview & discussion of derivatives (5:30 P.M.) 06/04/92 - Revised documents distributed BC, UC 06/10/92 - Board meeting Board - Fiscal Policy Committee packages mailed CSDOC, ML&CO. und -DEL_._E­ NEW ISSUE BOOK -ENTRY ONLY RATIPIGS: Standard & Poor's Corporation: AAA /A-1+ - Moody's Investors Service: Aaa/VMIG 1 (See "RATINGS" herein) In the opinion of Ca -Special Counsel. under existing law, the interest Component of Installment Payments received by the Owners of the Cerrifuates is exempt from personal income taxes of the State of California and, assuming compliance with the tax covenant described herein, is excluded from gross - income for Federal income tax purposes and is not a specific preference item for purposes of the Federal alternative minimum tax. See. however. "LEGAL .NATTERS —Tax Matters" herein regarding certain other tax considerations. o ; $98,500,000* CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 1990-92 SERIES C) evidencing direct and proportionate interests Mal in the right to receive Installment Payments; to be made by COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19, 29 39 69 7 AND 11 OF tow —, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA -7 3 ; Pursuant to an Agreement for Acquisition and Construction Dated: Date of Original Delivery Price: 100% Due: August 1, 2017 o This cover page contains certain information for quick reference only. It is not a summary of this issue. Investors must read the entire official : o statement to obtain information essential to the making of an informed investment decision. _v a, The Certificates evidence direct and proportionate interests in the right to receive Installment Payments to be made by the Participating Districts 3 j; pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement. Each Participating District is obligated to make its Installment Payments solely from the Net Enterprise Revenues of such Participating District's sanitary p g terry sewerage system. Each Participating District is responsible for its own Installment Payments only and is not obligated for any other Participating District's Installment Payments. _ " o The Certificates are deliverable in fully registered, book -entry form only and the registered Owner of the Certificates will be Cede & Co., as nominee c .° for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York ("DTC"), which will act as securities depository for the Certificates. Purchasers, as H 4E, a Beneficial Owners, will not receive physical certificates representing their interests in the Certificates purchased. Payments with respect to the t % 73 Certificates are to be made by State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (the "Trustee"), or its agent, to the registered ►— in Owner of the Certificates. So long as the Certificates are subject to the DTC book -entry system, such payments are to be made to DTC or its nominee, ci c Cede & Co. The disbursement of such payments to DTC Participants is the responsibility of DTC and disbursement of such payments to the Beneficial u Owners of the Certificates is the responsibility of the DTC Participants and Indirect Participants. See "BOOK -ENTRY SYSTEM" herein. ` E � The Certificates will initially be executed and delivered in the Daily Mode and in denominations of $100,000 or any integral multiple thereof. / >,? While in the Daily Mode, the interest rate with respect to the Certificates will be determined by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, `m 'a as Remarketing Agent, on each Business Day on the basis of market conditions, as described herein. In the Daily Mode. Intermit Components are 3 E v payable on the fifth Business Day of each calendar month commencing October 7, 1992. The Certificates are subject to optional and mandatory prepayment prior to maturity and to mandatory purchase as more fully described herein. n The payment of principal and interest when due with respect to the Certificates will be insured by a municipal bond insurance policy to be issued yr = by Financial Guaranty Insurance Company simultaneously with the delivery of the Certificates !! Financial Guarantv Insurance Ml"Cr Companv at In U _ C L .0 a7 sal ;,, Service nark wed by Financial Guaranty Inwranoe Company. ■ private company not E affiliated with any ti.S. government apeney. Payment of the Purchase Price equal to the Principal Component and up to 50• days accrued Interest Component at a maximum rate of 12% per o annum on the Certificates tendered for purchase as described herein and not remarketed will be made pursuant and subject to the terms of the Standby u = = Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Initial Liquidity Facility") among the Participating Districts and tow FGIC SECURITIES PURCHASE, INC. '; Delivery of this Official Statement in conjunction with the offering of the Certificates may only be made in conjunction with delivery of the prospectus -0 $ is and the accompanying prospectus supplement relating to the Initial Liquidity Facility. The Initial Liquidity Facility will expire on the fifth anniversary low y — •� of the delivery of the Certificates unless terminated sooner or extended as set forth herein. =S A The obligation of each Participating District to make its Installment Payments does not constitute an obligation of such Participating District for ° c c which it is obligated to levy or pledge any form of taxation or for which the Participating District has levied or pledged any form of taxation. The rv` d obligation of each Participating District to make its Installment Payments does not constitute a debt or indebtedness of such Participating District, the :4 W '— State of California or any of its political subdivisions within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation or restriction. 01 LD The Certificates are offered when, as and if delivered and received by the Underwriter, subject to the approval of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon. Los Angeles, California and Rourke & Woodruff, a professional corporation, Orange, California. Co -Special Counsel, and certain other conditions. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Underwriter by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, Los Angeles, California and for the O a Districts by Rourke & Woodruff, a professional corporation, Orange, California. It is anticipated that the Certificates in book -entry form will be Einavailable for delivery to DTC in New York, New York on or about September 1, 1992. a Merrill Lynch & Co. �--5 f Dated: 1992 � -preliminary, subject to change. bw Preliminary and Subject to Completion and Amendment, dated August 28, 1992 PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT d.+ (To Prospectus dated August 28, 1992) $989500,000* ar principal amount plus interest Liquidity Facility of 000 FDIC Securities Purchase, Inc. WW in support of Certificates of Participation ( Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series C ) evidencing direct and proportionate interests in the right to receive installment payments; to be made by ad ; County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California Dated Date of Certificates: Date of Original Delivery Maturity Date of the Certificates: August 1, 2017 First Optional Tender Date of the Certificates: September , 1992 The Certificates shall initially bear interest at an interest rate to be set daily by the Remarketing Agent and may be tendered for purchase at the option of the owner thereof under the circumstances described herein. The Certificates are also subject to optional and mandatory prepayment prior to maturity. Payment of the purchase price equal to the principal of and up to 50* days' accrued interest at a maximum rate of 12% per annum on the Certificates tendered for purchase as described herein and not remarketed will be made pursuant and subject to the terms of the Liquidity Facility described herein provided by FGIC SECURITIES PURCHASE, INC. "tl The Liquidity Facility will expire five years from the date of delivery of the Certificates unless extended or sooner terminated in accordance with the terms thereof. aid THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. The obligations of FGIC Securities Purchase, Inc. under the Liquidity Facility (the "Obligations") are not being sold separately from the Certificates, which are being offered pursuant to a separate Official Statement. The Obligations are not severable from the Certificates and may not be separately traded. This Prospectus Supplement and the accompanying Prospectus, appropriately supplemented, may also be j delivered in connection with any remarketing of Certificates purchased by FGIC Securities Purchase, Inc. or i its affiliates or upon a Change in Mode. Merrill Lynch & Co. The date of this Prospectus Supplement is , 1992. *Preliminary, subject to change TAX-EXEMPT 'NEON ISSUE Will Merrill 6ynai 'Aerrlli Lvncn Consumer Markets Merrill Lynch Capitai Markets M.L. SOLE -MANAGED ATTENTION: National Sales Directors Regional Directors Resident Vice Presidents Resident Managers Account Executives MW $98,500,000* CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 1990-92 SERIES C) �+ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS.1,293 6 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNW; CALIFORNIA W i Rating Agencies: Moody's: Aaa/VMIG I S&P. AAA/A-I+ Schedule: Mail: 08/28/92 • a Price: 08/31/92 • Selh 09/01/92 • Deliver. 09/01/92' 411111 Calls: In the Daily Mode, the Certificates are subject to optional prepayment, in whole, or in part in authorized denominations, on any Interest Component Payment Date. at a prepayment price equal to 100% WW plus the accrued and unpaid Interest Component to such prepayment date, if any. Maturity Structure Interest Mode: Initially interest will be calculated in the Daily Mode but may be converted to alternative modes, contingent upon the Districts providing notice as specified in the Official Statement Due: Maturing August 1. 2017 with mandatory sinking fund payments beginning August 1, 1993. Tender Ontion: In Daily Mode owner may tender for par plus accrued interest on any Busines Day. The following is a schedule of events: I1119 Dates: Dated: Delivery Date By 10:00 am: Remarketing Agent sets new interest rate, First Coupon: rebruary 1, 1993 effective until the next Business Day. Due: August By 10:30 am: Owner gives irrevocable Notice of Tender to Registration: The Certificates in the Daily Mode are deliverable in Remarketing Agent and Paying Agent. fully registered form in the denomination of S100,000 or any integral r.i multiple thereof. Remarketing A¢enr. Merrill Lynch & Co. Order & Market Information Trustee & Tax Exempt Money Markets Paving Agent: State Street Bank & Trust Company of Amy Ball (212) 449-4997 California, NA aaw 'iubiect to change Short ,1-A,or Office Use Only Term - h.% memoraMuDl reNteS to a DUDIK olltfTa. Undo' h0 CI ry for Injor Tam • I our oov of tht{ region M.T OQ Shown onot"uotco ALL Aor flC1COUNT nemDer Of the DUCK. Ihq TefhofalgWft r• ftll'retm a MIt"STAT M mlorTatloha) ISCUS e9 t01 4ECFF I ING pITH P e1. EXECUTIVES SHOULD READ THE gtELIM=V OFFICIAL STATEMENT BEFORE D15CUSSINGTHEOFFt7tINGWITH POTENTIAL BUYERS W PURPOSE: Proceeds from the sate of the Certificates will be used to finance each Participating District's share of the costs of the acquisition and construction of certain jointly owned sewage treatment and disposal facilities and to reimburse the Participating Districts for the cost of individually ,caned trunk sewer lines. SECURrlY: The Certificates evidence direct and proportionate interest in the right to receive Installment Payments to be paid by the Participating Districts under the Acquisition Agreement on a basis subordinate to the payment of its Senior Obligation Service. Pursuant to the Acquisition .agreement. each Participating District's obligation to make the Installment Payments is a special obligation of such Participating District payable solely from its Net Enterprise Revenues and does not constitute an obligation for which it is obligated to levy or pledge any form of taxation. The Certificates will be further secured by the Financial Guaranty Insurance Company (FGIC) guaranteeing the payment of principal and interest with respect to the Certificates. FGIC has also committed to issue a Standby Bond Purchase Agreement to expire on the fifth anniversary of the delivery „f the Certificates unless terminated sooner as set forth in the Official Statement. ISSUER: The Participating Districts are six special districts responsible for sewage transmission. treatment. and disposal for the metropolitan areas of Orange County. California. INFORMA110N POINTS: Financial Guaranty. Certificate Insurance and Standby Bond Purchase Agreement are being provided by Financial Guaranty. a wholly owned subsidiary of FGIC Corporation. FGIC Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of General Electric Capital Corporation. As of June 30. 199Z the total capital and surplus of Financial Guaranty was approximately 5597.000.000. The Pmiect: The Certificates are being issued to finance the cost of acquisition and construction of certain jointly owned sewage treatment and disposal facilities and certain trunk sewer lines owned by the Participating Districts. Tice acquisition and construction of the Project is expected to be completed by the end of the Districts' Fiscal Year 1992-91 At this time no difficulties are anticipated in accomplishing the construction itmd acquisition of the Project, and it is expected that the proceeds of the Certificates, together with any investment proceeds thereof and other available moneys, will be sufficient for such purpose. The Proiect's Functions: The Project is part of the Participating Districts' blaster Plan to provide for future quality sanitary sewerage servicm which arc increasingly environmentally efficient. to the growing number of inhabitants of the Participating Districts. 'Ilia Participating Districts: 'Ilie Districts are co -participants in a Joint Agreement which provides for the joint construction, ownership and operation of certain treatment and disposal property, plant, equipment and other assets constituting the Joint Facilities. The Participating Districts currently serve an approximately 310 square -mile area including 20 of the County s 29 cities and a population of approximately 2.025.000. MANAGERS: MERRILL LYNCH & CO. (SOLE) FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: finance: Stephen Coma Melissa Waters Underwriting Amy Ball (213) 6834696 (213) 683-4625 (212) 4494997 Interoffice No Memorandum To: See Distribution At: From: Melissa Waters At: PFG-WR Tel: (213) 683-4625 Merrill Lynch Date: August 27,1992 Subject: Marketing Plan tzW $98,500,000 Certificates of Participation Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series C tmd County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3,6,7 and 11 of Orange County, California SCHEDULE: ON OR ABOUT: Mail- August 28,19920 Price: August 31,1992* Sale: September 1,1992* Delivery: September 1,1992* dr First Interest: February 1,1993 Expected Ratings: Moody's: Aaa/VMIG I S&P: AAA/A-I+ Denominations: $100,000 denominations .d MANAGERS: MERRILL LYNCH & CO. (SOLE) too PLAN: The following will be assigned as representatives of their departments: Stephen R. Coma Public Finance/LA (213) 683-4696 Melissa A. Waters Public Fmance/LA (213) 683-4625 sd Amy Ball Underwriting/NY (212) 449-4997 STEPS PERSONNEL DATES kXW 1. Green Sheet Distributed Waters August 27,1992 2. Mailing of P.O.S. Waters August 28,1992 3. Posting on IMS/DOS Systems Ball As Needed 4. "B" Wire Sent Ball As Needed 5. Squawk Box Ball As Needed 6. Morning Call Ball As Needed 7. Institutional A/E Conference Call Ball As Needed 8. Order Final Official Statements Waters August 31,1992 9. Pricing Ball/Coma August 31,1992 10. Sale Ball/Coma September 1,1992 11. Closing Coma September 1,1992 DISTRIBUTION: D. Komansky, E. Sheridan, M. Eisenberg, D. Boyle, S. Corliss, R. Barber, O. Lisec, J. Tresch, J. Lawlor, S. Narker, F. Young, S. Feldstein, J. Bonacorda, PFG Executive Committee, PFG Western Region r 'Subject to change. wo • v Udd tw THE BOND BUYER New on Calendar IM111 NEGOTIATED This list includes tentative dates for the largest negotiated bond sales reported today with the principal co -manager. For details see "Proposed issues." TAX-EXEMPT twi $224.445.000 Michigan State Housing Development Authority. First Boston Corp., as senior manager, expects to negotiate the purchase of rental housing revenue bonds. 1992 Series A. during the week of Aug. 31. S200.000.000 Illinois. PaineWebber Incorporated. as senior manager, expects to negotiate the purchase of Build Illinois revenue bonds. during the week of Aug. 31. $170.085.000 New York State Thruway Authority. Merrill Lynch & Co., as senior manager, expects to negotiate the purchase of local highway and bridge service contract bonds. Series 1992, during the week of Aug. 31. S 130,000,000 Clark Co., Nev. Smith Barney. Harris Upham & Co., Inc., as senior manager. expects to negotiate the purchase of industrial development revenue (Book -Entry) bonds. (Southwest Gas Corporation). 1992 Series A and 1992 Series B. during the week of - Aug. 31. S98.500.000 Orange Co. County Sanitation Districts No. 1. 2.3. 6. 7 and 11. r+ Calif. Merrill Lvnch & Co.. (alone), expects to negotiate the purchase of daIN variable rate (FGIC Insured/Book-Entry) certificates of participation, capital Improvements, on orabout Sept. 1. $74.745,805 Indiana Health Facility Financing Authority. First Boston Corp., as senior manager. expects to negotiate the purchase of hospital revenue refunding bonds. Series 1992A. (Methodist Hospital of Indiana. Inc.). during the week of Aug. 31. S50,000,000 Heartland Consumer Power Dist.. S.D. Lehman Brothers, as senior manager, expects to negotiate the purchase of electric system revenue (Book -Entry) bonds. during the week of Aug. 31. $41.590.000 Tulare Co.. Calif. A.G. Edwards & Sons. Inc., as senior manager. expects to negotiate the purchase of certificates of participation. aid Series A (MBIA Insured) and Series B. (Book -Entry), during the week of Aug. 31. $41.000.000 Orange Co., Fla. First Boston Corp., as senior manager, expects to negotiate the purchase of capital Improvement and refunding de bonds. during the week of Aug. 31. S32.000.000 Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authoritv. State Street Bank and Trust Co.. Boston, as senior manager, expects to negotiate the purchase of revenue (Book -Entry) bonds, (Suffolk University), during the week of Aug. 31. how S30.000,000 Ashland. Ky. Goldman. Sachs & Co., as senior mana>3er, expects to negotiate the purchase of pollution control refunding revenue bonds. Series 1992. (Ashland 011. Inc. Project), during the week of Aug. 31. r1w $30.000.000 Richmond Hospital Authority. Ind. PaineWebber Incorporated, as senior manager, expects to negotiate the purchase of hospital revenue bonds. during the week of Aug. 31. $18.000.000 Southwestern Illinois Development Authority. Ziegler Securities a ,9i division of B.C. Ziegler& Co., (alone), expects to negotiate the purchase of medical factitties revenue bonds. Anderson Hospital Project, Series 1992 A. on or about Sept. 2. S 15.305,000 Kalamazoo. Mich. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.. as senior manager. expects to negotiate the purchase of wastewater system revenue refunding bonds, during the week of Aug. 31. S 13,275,000 Macomb Co. Community College Dist.. Mich. A.G. Edwards & Sons. Inc.. (alone). expects to negotiate the purchase of unlimited tax refunding general obligation bonds. during the week of Aug. r+ 31. S 10.000.000 Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency. Calif. Grigsby Brandford & Co. Inc.. as senior manager, expects to negotiate the THE BOND BUYER Proposed Bond Issues Compiled by Michelle Midura CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Community Redevel- opment Agency, Calif. — S10.000.000 Girgsbv Brandford & Co. Inc., as senior manager, expects to ne- gotiate the purchase of tax allocation bonds. A and B. during the week of Aug. 31. L.O.:Hawkins. Deiafleld & Wood. Los Angeles. To Report or Obtain Information: Proposed Bond Issues 212-943-8546 Bond Calls and 212 943 8546 Redemptions Sealed Bids Invited 212-943-8544 Competitive Sales 212-943-8600 ReWis Negotiated Sales 212-943-7897 Results Bond Ratings 212-943-8545 Short -Term Financing 212-943-8545 Negotiated oMerings 212-943-7898 Orange Co. County Saaitation Dis- tricts No. 1. 2. 3. 6. 7 and 11. Calif. (Santa Ana) — $98.500.000 — Mer- rill Lynch & Co.. (alone), expects to ne- gotiate the purchase of daily variable rate (FGIC Insured/Book-Entry) certifi- cates of participation, capital Improve- ments. on or about Sept. 1. L.O.:Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon. Los Angeles. Tulare Co.. Calif. (Visalia) — $41.690.000 — A.G. Edwards & Sons. Inc.. as senior manager. expects to ne- gotiate the purchase of certificates of participation. Series A (MBIA Insuredl and Series B. (Book -Entry), during the week of Aug. 31. FLORIDA Orange Co.. Fla. (Orlando) — $41.000,000 — First Boston Corp.. as senior manager. expects to negotiate the purchase of capital improvement and refunding bonds. during the week of Aug. 31. ILLINOIS Illinois (Springfield) — $200.000.000 — PaineWebber Incor- porated. as senior manager. expects to negotiate the purchase of Build Illinois t t [ t [ t t t t Ff t t t t t I t (, k [ $98,500,000.00 County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3,6,7& 11 of Orange County (Capital Improvement Program 1990-92, Series C) FINAL STRUCTURE STRUCTURE Interest Rate Bond Type: Variable Rate Sale Date: September 1, 1992 Transaction Size: $982500,000 Term: 25 years Lien: Subordinate Lien Structure: Certificates of Participation Credit Enhancement: Bond Insurance & 5 Year Line of Credit Provided By FGIC Underlying CSDOC Rating: Standard & Poor's: AA— Moody's: Aa Series C Rating: Standard & Poor's: AAA (same as rating of insuror) Moody's: Aaa Reserve Fund: 10% of Par Amount }� Capitalized Interest: None 6�S Merrill Lynch �.'RRILL LYNCH & CO. (."1/92 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $98,500 000 Daily Rate Certificates of Participation County §anitation Districts Nos. 1,2 3,6,T & 11 of Orange County, CA (Capital Improvements Program 1990-9�, Series C) Schedule 1: Sources & Uses SOURCES OF FUNDS ------------------------------------ Par Amount of Bonds: Plus Premium / less Discount: Accrued Interest: Gross Production: USES OF FUNDS Deposit to Construction Fund: Insurance Premium: Upfront Insurance Fee: Reserve Fund: Costs of Issuance: Underwriting Spread: Deposit of Accrued Interest: Rounding: KEY DATES & ASSUMPTIONS ------------------------------------ Dated: Delivery: First Interest: First Maturity: First Construction Draw: Last Maturity: Underwriting Spread: VARIABLE RATE ASSUMPTIONS Upfront Insurance Fee: Insurance Premium (1): Reserve Fund: Daily Remarketing Fee: BB Revenue Index (08/27): Arbitrage TIC: All -In TIC: Average Life in Years: NOTES ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------- $98,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 --------------- $98,500,000.00 --------------- --------------- $87,117,756.26 636,541.71 98,500.00 91850000.00 250:000.00 541,750.00 0.00 5,452.03 $98,500,000.00 -------------- -------------- 09/01/92 09/01/92 02/01/93 08/01/93 09/01/92 08/01/17 $5.50 0.100% 0.300% 10.000% 0.125% 6.450% 6.639% 6.727% 16.60 - Debt Service Amortized at 7.50% (1) Premium Based on Debt Service Assuming BB Revenue Bond Index & 50 SP [ [ [ [ l [ [ t t t t [ [ t t [ [ f MERR( -YNCH & CO. 08/31/92 ==____----------- $98,500,000 Daily Rate Certificates of Participation County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3,6,7 & 11 of Orange County, CA (Capital Improvements Program 1990-92, Series C) Schedule 2: Proposed Debt Service ALL DISTRICT 100.000% Annual Date Rate Yield Principal Interest Total FY Total FY 1 ---------- 02/01/93 -------- -------- ---------- ----------- 2,667,708 ----------- 2,667,708 ----------- 2,667,708 ------- 92 - 93 2 08/01/93 6.500% 6.500% 1,400,000 3,201,250 4,601,250 3 02/01/94 3,155,750 3,155,750 7,757,000 93 - 94 4 08/01/94 6.500% 6.500% 1,500,000 3,155,750 4,655,750 5 02/01/95 3,107,000 3,107,000 7,762,750 94 - 95 6 08/01/95 6.500% 6.500% 1,600,000 3,107,000 4,707,000 7 02/01/96 3,055,000 3,055,000 7,762,000 95 - 96 8 08/01/96 6.500% 6.500% 1,700,000 3,055,000 4,755,000 9 02/01/97 2,999,750 2,999,750 7,754,750 96 - 97 10 08/01/97 6.500% 6.500% 1,900,000 2,999,750 4,899,750 11 02/01/98 2,938,000 2,938,000 7,837,750 97 - 98 12 08/01/98 6.500% 6.500% 2,000,000 2,938,000 4,938,000 13 02/01/99 2,873,000 2,873,000 7,811,000 98 - 99 14 08/01/99 6.500% 6.500% 2,200,000 2,873,000 5,073,000 15 02/01/2000 2,801,500 2,801,500 7,874,500 99 - 00 16 08/01/2000 6.500% 6.500% 2,400,000 2,801,500 5,201,500 17 02/01/2001 2,723,500 2,723,500 7,925,000 00 - 01 18 08/01/2001 6.500% 6.500% 2,500,000 2,723,500 5,223,500 19 02/01/2002 2,642,250 2,642,250 7,865,750 01 - 02 20 08/01/2002 6.500% 6.500% 2,700,000 2,642,250 5,342,250 21 02/01/2003 2,554,500 2,554,500 7,896,750 02 - 03 22 08/01/2003 6.500% 6.500% 2,900,000 2,554,500 5,454,500 23 02/01/2004 2,460,250 2,460,250 7,914,750 03 - 04 24 08/01/2004 6.500% 6.500% 3,200,000 2,460,250 5,660,250 25 02/01/2005 2,356,250 2,356,250 8,016,500 04 - 05 26 08/01/2005 6.500% 6.500% 3,400,000 2,356,250 5,756,250 27 02/01/2006 2,245,750 2,245,750 8,002,000 05 - 06 28 08/01/2006 6.500% 6.500% 3,700,000 2,245,750 5,945,750 29 02/01/2007 2,125,500 2,125,500 8,071,250 06 - 07 30 08/O1/2007 6.500% 6.500% 4,000,000 2,125,500 6,125,500 31 02/01/2008 1,995,500 1,995,500 8,121,000 07 - 08 32 08/01/2008 6.500% 6.500% 4,300,000 1,995,500 6,295,500 33 02/01/2009 1,855,750 1,855,750 8,151,250 08 - 09 34 08/01/2009 6.500% 6.500% 4,600,000 1,855,750 6,455,750 35 02/01/2010 1,706,250 1,706,250 8,162,000 09 - 10 36 08/01/2010 6.500% 6.500% 5,000,000 1,706,250 6,706,250 37 02/01/2011 1,543,750 1,543,750 8,250,000 10 - 11 38 08/01/2011 6.500% 6.500% 5,400,000 1,543,750 6,943,750 39 02/01/2012 1,368,250 1,368,250 8,312,000 11 - 12 40 08/01/2012 6.500% 6.500% 5,800,000 1,368,250 7,168,250 41 02/01/2013 1,179,750 1,179,750 8,348,000 12 - 13 42 08/01/2013 6.500% 6.500% 6,200,000 1,179,750 7,379,750 43 02/O1/2014 978,250 978,250 8,358,000 13 - 14 44 08/01/2014 6.500% 6.500% 6,700,000 978,250 7,678,250 45 02/01/2015 760,500 760,500 8,438,750 14 - 15 46 OB/01/2015 6.500% 6.500% 7,200,000 760,500 7,960,500 47 02/01/2016 526,500 526,500 8,487,000 15 - 16 48 08/01/2016 6.500% 6.500% 7,800,000 526,500 8,326,500 49 02/01/2017 273,000 273,000 8,599,500 16 - 17 50 08/01/2017 6.500% 6.500% 8,400,000 273,000 8,673,000 ---------- ----------- ----------- 8,673,000 ----------- 17 - 18 $98,500,000 $106,319,958 $204,819,958 $204,819,958 I t [ t [ t t [ t I I I I [ [ [ I MERR( -YNCH ---------------------------------------------------------------------- & CO. 08/31/92 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- $9,999,000 Daily Rate Certificates of Participation County Sanitation Districts (Capital Improvements Program Nos. 1,2 1990-9f, 3,6,7 & Series 11 of Orange C) County, CA Schedule 2: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Debt Service DISTRICT tl1: 10.152% Date Rate Yield Principal Interest Total 1 ---------- 02/01/93 -------- -------- ---------- ----------- 270,833 ----------- 270,833 2 08/01/93 6.500% 6.500% 142,132 325000 467,132 3 02/01/94 320:381 320,381 4 08/01/94 6.500% 6.500% 152,284 320,381 472,665 5 02/01/95 315,431 315,431 6 08/01/95 6.500% 6.500% 162,437 315,431 477,868 7 02/01/96 310,152 310,152 8 08/01/96 6.500% 6.500% 172,589 310,152 482,741 9 02/01/97 304,543 304,543 10 08/01/97 6.500% 6.500% 192,893 304,543 497,437 11 02/01/98 298,274 298,274 12 08/01/98 6.500% 6.500% 203,046 298,274 501,320 13 02/01/99 291,675 291,675 14 0 /01/99 6.500% 6.500% 223,350 291,675 515,025 15 02/01/2000 284,416 284,416 16 08/01/2000 6.500% 6.500% 243,655 284,416 528,071 17 02/01/2001 276,497 276,497 18 08/01/2001 6.500% 6.500% 253,807 276,497 530,305 19 02/01/2002 268,249 268,249 20 OB/01/2002 6.500% 6.500% 274,112 268,249 542,360 21 02/01/2003 259,340 259,340 22 08/01/2003 6.500% 6.500% 294,416 259,340 553,756 23 02/01/2004 249,772 249,772 24 08/01/2004 6.500% 6.500% 324,873 249,772 574,645 25 02/01/2005 239,213 239,213 26 OB/01/2005 6.500% 6.500% 345,178 239,213 584,391 27 02/01/2006 227,995 227,995 28 08/01/2006 6.500% 6.500% 375,635 227,995 603,629 29 02/01/2007 215,787 215,787 30 08/01/2007 6.500% 6.500% 406,091 215,787 621,878 31 02/01/2008 202,589 202,589 32 08/01/2008 6.500% 6.500% 436,548 202,589 639,137 33 02/01/2009 188,401 188,401 34 08/01/2009 6.500% 6.500% 467,005 188,401 655,406 35 02/01/2010 173,223 173,223 36 OB/01/2010 6.500% 6.500% 507,614 173,223 680,838 37 02/01/2011 156,726 156,726 38 08/01/2011 6.500% 6.500% 548,223 156,726 704,949 39 08/01/2012 138,909 138,909 40 0/01/2012 6.500% 6.500% 588,832 138,909 727,741 41 02/01/2013 119,772 119,772 42 08/01/2013 6.500% 6.500% 629,442 119,772 749,213 43 02/01/2014 99,315 99,315 44 08/01/2014 6.500% 6.500% 680,203 99,315 779,518 45 02/01/2015 77,208 77,208 46 08/01/2015 6.500% 6.500% 730,964 77,208 808,173 47 02/01/2016 53,452 53,452 48 08/01/2016 6.500% 6.500% 791,878 53,452 845,330 49 02/01/2017 27,716 27,716 50 08/01/2017 6.500% 6.500% 852,792 27,716 880,508 $10,000,000 $10,793,904 $20,793,904 Annual FY Total ........... 787,513 788,096 788,020 787,284 795,711 792,995 799,442 804,569 798,553 801,701 803,528 813,858 812,386 819,416 824,467 827,538 828,629 837,563 843,858 847,513 848,528 856,726 861,624 873,046 880,508 $20,793,904 I FY 92 - 93 93 - 94 94 - 95 95 - 96 96 - 97 97 - 98 98 - 99 99 - 00 00 - 01 01 - 02 02 - 03 03 - 04 04 - 05 05 - 06 06 - 07 07 - 08 08 - 09 09 - 10 10 - 11 11-12 12 - 13 13 - 14 14 - 15 15 - 16 16 - 17 17 - 18 I I [ [ [ I SUMMARY Par Amount: $10,000,000.00 Construction Fund: $8,844,442.29 Reserve Fund: $1,000,000.00 Costs of Issuance: $25,380.71 underwriting Spread: S55,000.00 Insurance Premium: $64,623.52 Upfront Insurance Fee: $10 000.00 Rounding: 653.47 Total OS:-..------------- $20=793,904 37 i [ [ [ i [ [ [ [ 0 MEk SYNCH & CO. 08/31/92 _ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- $27,500 000 Daily Rate Certificates of Participation County sanitation Districts Nos. 12 3,6,7 & 11 of Orange County, CA (Capital Improvements Program 19W O, Series C) Schedule 2: Proposed Debt Service ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISTRICT #2: 27.919% Annual Date Rate Yield Principal Interest Total FY Total ---------- -------- -------- ---------- ---------------------- ----------- 6.500% 6.500% 390,863 6.500% 6.500% 418,782 6.500% 6.500% 446,701 6.500% 6.500% 474,619 6.500% 6.500% 530,457 6.500% 6.500% 558,376 6.500% 6.500% 614,213 6.500% 6.500% 670,051 6.500% 6.500% 697,970 6.500% 6.500% 753,807 6.500% 6.500% 809,645 6.500% 6.500% 893,401 6.500% 6.500% 949,239 6.500% 6.500% 1,032,995 6.500% 6.500% 1,116,751 6.500% 6.500% 1,200,508 6.500% 6.500% 1,284,264 6.500% 6.500% 1,395,939 6.500% 6.500% 1,507,614 6.500% 6.500% 1,619,289 6.500% 6.500% 1,730,964 6.500% 6.500% 1,870,558 6.500% 6.500% 2,010,152 6.500% 6.500% 2,177,665 6.500% 6.500% 2,345,178 744,792 744,792 744,792 893,750 1,284,613 881,047 881,047 2,165,660 881,047 1,299,829 867,437 867,437 2,167,265 867,437 1,314,137 852,919 852,919 2,167,056 852,919 1,327,538 837,494 837,494 2,165,032 837,494 1,367,951 820,254 820,254 2,188,204 820,254 1,378,629 802,107 802,107 2,180,736 802,107 1,416,320 782,145 782,145 2,198,464 782,145 1,452,195 760,368 760,368 2,212,563 760,368 1,458,338 737,684 737,684 2,196,022 737,684 1,491,491 713,185 713,185 2,204,676 713,185 1,522,830 686,872 686,872 2,209,702 686,872 1,580,273 657,836 657,836 2,238,109 657,836 1,607,075 626,986 626,986 2,234,061 626,986 1,659,981 593,414 593,414 2,253,395 593,414 1,710,165 557,119 557,119 20267,284 557,119 1,757627 518,103 518:103 2,275,730 518,103 1,802,367 476,364 476,364 2,278,731 476,364 1,872,303 430,996 430,996 2,303,299 430,996 1,938,610 381,999 381,999 2,320,609 381,999 2,001,288 329,372 329,372 2,330,660 329,372 2,060,336 273,115 273,115 2,333,452 273,115 2,143,674 212,322 212,322 2,355#996 212,322 2,222475 146:992 146:992 2,369,467 146,992 2,324,657 76,218 76,218 2,400,876 76,218 2,421,396 2,421,396 327,500,000 $29,683,237 $57,183,237 $57,183,237 FY SUMMARY 92 - 93 93 - 94 Par Amount: $27,500,000.00 94 - 95 Construction Fund: $24,322,216.19 Reserve Fund: $2,750000.00 95 - 96 Costs of Issuance: $69:796.95 Underwriting Spread: $151,250.00 96 - 97 Insurance Premium: $177,714.69 Upfront Insurance Fee: $27,500.00 97 - 98 Rounding: E1,522.17 98 - 99 Total DS: $57,183,237.12 99 - 00 00 - 01 01 - 02 02 - 03 03 - 04 04 - 05 05 - 06 06 07 07 - 08 08 - 09 09 - 10 10 - 11 11 - 12 12 - 13 13 - 14 14 - 15 15 - 16 16 - 17 17 - 18 [ t t [ t [ t [ t 6 MERR , LYNCH & CO. 08/31/92 === ----------------- $33,499 000 Daily Rate Certificates of Participation County §anitation Districts Nos. 1,2 3,6,7 & 11 of Orange County, CA (Capital Improvements Program 140'-0, Series C) Schedule 2: Proposed Debt Service -------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISTRICT #3: 34.010% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 15 16 18 21 22 24 26 Date Rate ------------------ -------- Yield Principal ---------- 02/01/93 ON 1/93 6.500% 6.500% 476,142 02/01/94 08/01/94 6.500% 6.500% 510,152 02/01/95 08/01/95 6.500% 6.500% 544,162 02/01/96 08/01/96 6.500% 02/01/97 6.500% 578,173 08/01/97 6.500% 02/01/98 6.500% 646,193 08/01/98 6.500% 6.500% 680,203 02/01/99 08/01/99 6.500% 6.500% 748,223 02/01/2000 08/01/2000 6.500% 6.500% 816,244 02/01/2001 08/01/2001 6.500% 6.500% 850,254 02/01/2002 08/01/2002 6.500% 6.500% 918,274 02/01/2003 08/01/2003 6.500% 6.500% 986,294 02/01/2004 08/01/2004 6.500% 6.500% 1,088,325 02/01/2005 08/01/2005 6.500% 6.500% 1,156,345 02/01/2006 08/01/2006 6.500% 6.500% 1,258,376 02/01/2007 08/01/2007 6.500% 6.500% 1,360,406 02/01/2008 08/0 /2008 6.500% 6.500% 1,462,437 02/O1/2009 08/01/2009 6.500% 6.500% 1,564,467 02/01/2010 08/01/2010 6.500% 6.500% 1,700,508 02/01/2011 08/01/2011 6.500% 6.500% 1,836,548 02/01/2012 08/01/2012 6.500% 6.500% 1,972,589 02/01/2013 08/01/2013 02/01/2014 6.500% 6.500% 2,108,629 08/01/2014 6.500% 6.500% 2,278,680 02/01/2015 08/01/2015 6.500% 6.500% 2,448,731 02/01/2016 08/01/2016 02/01/2017 6.500% 6.500% 2,652,792 08/01/2017 6.500% 6.500% 2,856,853 Interest 907,292 1088,750 1:073,275 1,073,275 1,056,695 1,056,695 1,039,010 1,039,010 1,020,220 1,020,220 999,218 999,218 977,112 977,112 952,794 952,794 926,266 926,266 898,633 898,633 868,789 868,789 836,735 836,735 801,364 801,364 763,783 722,8886 722;886 678,673 678,673 631,143 631,143 580,298 580,298 525,032 525,032 465,344 465,344 401,235 401,235 332,704 332,704 258647 258:647 179063 179:063 92,848 92,848 --------------------- $33,500,000 $36,159,580 Annual Total FY Total ----------- 907,292 907,292 1,564,892 1,073,275 2,638,168 1,583,428 1,056,695 2,640,123 1,600,858 1,039,010 2,639,868 1,617,183 1,020,220 2,637,402 1,666,412 999,218 2,665,631 1,679,421 977,112 2,656,533 1,725,335 952,794 2,678,129 1,769,038 926,266 2,695,305 1,776,520 898,633 2,675,154 1,816,907 868,789 2,685,697 1,855,084 836,735 2,691,819 1,925,060 801,364 2,726,424 1,957,709 763,783 2,721,492 2,022,159 722,886 2,745,044 2,083,292 678,673 2,761,964 2,141,109 631,143 2,772,253 2,195,610 580,298 2,775,909 2,280,806 525,032 2,805,838 2,361,580 465,344 2,826,924 2,437,933 401,235 2,839,168 2,509,864 332,704 2,842,569 2,611,385 258,647 2,870,032 2,707,378 179,063 2,886,442 2,831,855 92,848 2,924,703 2,949,700 2,949,700 ----------- ----------- $69,659,580 $69,659,580 FY 92-93 93 - 94 94 - 95 95 - 96 96-97 97 - 98 98 - 99 99 - 00 00 - 01 01 - 02 02 - 03 03 - 04 04 - 05 05 - 06 06 - 07 07 - 08 08 - 09 09 - 10 10 - 11 11 - 12 12 - 13 13 - 14 14 - 15 15 - 16 16 - 17 17 - 18 i i I I t I ( SUMMARY Par Amount: $33,500,000.00 Construction Fund: $29,628,881.59 Reserve Fund: $3,350000.00 Costs of Issuance: $85:025.38 Underwriting Spread: $184250.00 Insurance Premium: $216:488.81 Upfront Insurance Fee: $33,500.00 Rounding: $1,854.22 Total-DS$69,659,579.72 [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ MERR(- SYNCH & CO. 08/31/92 =C ------------------ $6,999,000 Daily Rate Certificates of Participation County Sanitation Districts Nos. 12 3,6,7 & 11 of Orange County, CA (Capital Improvements Program 199010 , Series C) Schedule 2: Proposed Debt Service ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISTRICT #6: 7.107% Date Rate Yield Principal Interest Total ---------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------- ----------- 189,583 6.500% 6.500% 99,492 227,500 224,266 6.500% 6.500% 106,599 224,266 220,802 6.500% 6.50D% 113,706 220,802 217,107 6.500% 6.500% 120,812 217,107 213,180 6.500% 6.500% 135,025 213,180 208,792 6.500% 6.500% 142,132 208,792 204,173 6.500% 6.500% 156,345 204,173 199,091 6.500% 6.500% 170,558 199091 193:548 6.500% 6.500% 177,665 193,548 187,774 6.500% 6.500% 191,878 187,774 181,538 6.500% 6.500% 206,091 181,538 174,840 6.500% 6.500% 227,411 174,840 167,449 6.500% 6.500% 241,624 167,449 159,596 6.500% 6.500% 262,944 159,596 151,051 6.500% 6.500% 294,264 151,051 141,812 6.500% 6.500% 305,584 141,812 131,881 6.500% 6.500% 326,904 131,881 121,256 6.500% 6.500% 355,330 121,256 109,708 6.500% 6.500% 383,756 109,708 97,236 6.500% 6.500% 412,183 97,236 83,840 6.500% 6.500% 440,609 83,840 69,520 6.500% 6.500% 476,142 69,520 54,046 6.500% 6.500% 511,675 54,046 37,416 6.500% 6.500% 554,315 37,416 19,401 6.500% 6.500% 596,954 19,401 189,583 326,992 224,266 330,865 220,802 334,508 217,107 337,919 213,180 348,206 208,792 350,924 204,173 360,518 199,091 435,315 141,812 447,396 131,881 458,784 121,256 476,586 109,708 493,464 97,236 509,419 83,840 524,449 69,520 545,662 54,046 565,721 37,416 591,731 19,401 616,355 $7,000,000 $7,555,733 $14,555,733 Annual FY Total ----189,583 551,259 551,668 551,614 551,099 556,997 555,096 559,609 563,198 558,987 561,190 562,470 569,701 568,670 573,591 577,127 579,277 580,041 586,294 590,701 593259 593:970 599,708 603,137 611,132 616,355 $14,555,733 FY 92 - 93 93 - 94 94-95 95 - 96 96-97 97 - 98 98 - 99 99 - 00 00 - 01 01 - 02 02 - 03 03 - 04 04 - 05 05 - 06 06 - 07 07 - 08 08 - 09 09 - 10 10 - 11 11-12 12 - 13 13 - 14 14 - 15 15 - 16 16 - 17 17 - 18 I I I I I t ( SUMMARY Par Amount: $7,000,000.00 Construction Fund: Reserve Fund: $6 191109.60 1700:000.00 Costs of Issuance: $17,766.50 Underwriting Spread: $38,500.00 Insurance Premium: $45,236.47 Upfront Insurance Fee: $7 000.00 Rounding: 1387.43 Total DS:---V------------$14=555,733y06 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 [ [ [ t [ [ [ (R MERL LYNCH & CO. 08/31/92 \ -------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- $7,500,000 Daily Rate Certificates of Participation County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2 3,6,7 & 11 of Orange County, CA (Capital Improvements Program 1990-9f, Series C) Schedule 2: Proposed Debt Service ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISTRICT #7: 7.614% Annual Date Rate Yield Principal Interest Total FY Total -------------------------- ---------- ---------------------- ----------- 203,125 6.500% 6.500% 106,599 243,750 240,286 6.500% 6.500% 114,213 240,286 236,574 6.500% 6.500% 121,827 236,574 232,614 6.500% 6.500% 129,442 232,614 228,407 6.500% 6.500% 144,670 228,407 223,706 6.500% 6.500% 152,284 223,706 218,756 6.500% 6.500% 167,513 218,756 213,312 6.500% 6.500% 182,741 213,312 207,373 6.500% 6.500% 190,355 207,373 201,187 6.500% 6.500% 205,584 201,187 194,505 6.500% 6.500% 220,812 194,505 187,329 6.500% 6.500% 243,655 187,329 179,410 6.500% 6.500% 258,883 179,410 170,996 6.500% 6.500% 281,726 170,996 161,940 6.500% 6.500% 304,569 161,840 151,942 6.500% 6.500% 327,411 151,942 141,301 6.500% 6.500% 350,254 141,301 129,918 6.500% 6.500% 380,711 129,918 117,544 6.500% 6.500% 411,168 117,544 104,181 6.500% 6.500% 441,624 104,181 89,829 6.500% 6.500% 472,081 89,829 74,486 6.500% 6.500% 510,152 74,486 57,906 6.500% 6.500% 548,223 57,906 40,089 6.500% 6.500% 593,909 40,089 20,787 6.500% 6.500% 639,594 20,787 203,125 203,125 350,349 240,286 590,635 354,499 236,574 591,072 358,401 232,614 591,015 362,056 228,407 590,463 373,077 223,706 596,783 375,990 218,756 594,746 386,269 213,312 599,581 396,053 207,373 603,426 397,728 201,187 598,915 406,770 194,505 601,275 415,317 187,329 602,646 430,984 179,410 610,393 438,293 170,996 609,289 452,722 161,840 614,562 466,409 151,942 618,350 479,353 141,301 620,654 491,555 129,918 621,472 510,628 117,544 628,173 528,712 104,181 632,893 545,806 89,829 635,635 561,910 74,486 636,396 584,638 57,906 642,544 606,129 40,089 646,218 633,997 20,787 654,784 660,381 660,381 $7,500,000 $8,095,428 $15,595,428 $15,595,428 [ FY 92 - 93 93 - 94 94 - 95 95 - 96 96 - 97 97 - 98 98 - 99 99 - 00 QO - 01 01 - 02 02 - 03 03 - 04 04 - 05 05 - 06 06 - 07 07 - 08 08 - 09 09 - 10 10 - 11 11 - 12 12 - 13 13 - 14 14 - 15 15 - 16 16 - 17 17 - 18 [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ SUMMARY Par Amount: $7,500,000.00 Construction Fund: Reserve Fund: $6 633,331.70 050,000.00 Costs of Issuance: $19,035.53 Underwriting Spread: S41,250.00 insurance Premium: $48,467.64 Upfront Insurance Fee: $7 500.00 Rounding: W 5.13 Total DS: $15,595,428.30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 48 50 [ ( t [ [ t [ a MERR(_ SYNCH & CO. 08/31/92 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- $13,000 000 Daily Rate Certificates of Participation County sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2 3,6,7 & 11 of Orange County, CA (Capital Improvements Program 1990-9`G, Series C) Schedule 2: Proposed Debt Service ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISTRICT #11 13.198% Annual Date Rate Yield Principal Interest Total FY Total ---------- -------------------------- ----------- ---------------------- 6.500% 6.500% 184,772 6.500% 6.500% 197,970 6.500% 6.500% 211,168 6.500% 6.500% 224,365 6.500% 6.500% 250,761 6.500% 6.500% 263,959 6.500% 6.500% 290,355 6.500% 6.500% 316,751 6.500% 6.500% 329,949 6.500% 6.500% 356,345 6.500% 6.500% 382,741 6.500% 6.500% 422,335 6.500% 6.500% 448,731 6.500% 6.500% 488,325 6.500% 6.500% 527,919 6.500% 6.500% 567,513 6.500% 6.500% 607,107 6.500% 6.500% 659,898 6.500% 6.500% 712,690 6.500% 6.500% 765,482 6.500% 6.500% 818,274 6.500% 6.500% 884,264 6.500% 6.500% 950,254 6.500% 6.500% 1,029,442 6.500% 6.500% 1,108,629 352,083 352,083 352,083 422,500 607,272 416,495 416,495 1,023,766 416,495 614,464 410,061 410,061 1,024,525 410,061 621,228 403,198 403,198 1,024,426 403,198 627,563 395,906 395,906 1,023,470 395,906 646,668 387,756 387,756 1,034,424 387,756 651,716 379,178 379,178 1,030,893 379,178 669,533 369,741 369,741 1,039,274 369,741 686,492 359,447 359,447 1,D45,939 359,447 689,396 348,723 348,723 1,038,119 348,723 705,069 337,142 337,142 1,042,211 337,142 719,883 324,703 324,703 1,044,586 324,703 747,038 310,977 310,977 1,058,015 310,977 759,708 296,393 296,393 1,056,102 296,393 784,718 280,523 280,523 1,065,241 280,523 808,442 263,365 263,365 1,071,807 263,365 830,878 244,921 244,921 1,075,799 244,921 852,028 225,190 225,190 1,077,218 225,190 885,089 203,744 203,744 1,088,832 203,744 916,434 180,581 180,581 1,097,015 180,581 946,063 155,703 155,703 1,101,766 155,703 973,977 129,109 129,109 1,103,086 129,109 1,013,373 100,371 100,371 1,113,744 100,371 1,050,624 69,487 69,487 1,120,112 69,487 1,098,929 36,030 36,030 1,134,959 36,030 1,144,660 1,144,660 $13,000,000 $14,032,076 $27,032,076 $27,032,076 FY 92 - 93 93 - 94 94 - 95 95 - 96 96 - 97 97 - 98 98 - 99 99 - 00 00 - 01 01 - 02 02-03 03 - 04 04-05 05 - 06 06 - 07 07 - 08 08 - 09 09 - 10 10 - 11 11 - 12 12 - 13 13 - 14 14 - 15 15 - 16 16 - 17 17 - 18 t I I t t I ( SUMMARY Par Amount: $13,000,000.00 Construction Fund: $11,497,774.90 Reserve Fund: $1,300,000.00 Costs of Issuance: $32,994.92 Underwriting Spread: $71,500.00 Insurance Premium: $84,010.58 Upfront Insurance Fee: $13 000.00 Rounding: 019.60 Total DS: $27,032,075.74 a t t . t t t t t t I I t t t t t t t t ( ( ( 9 8 0\ 6 U L. N 5 �a b cu ti 4 a. x w 3 rn au .j 2 1 0 12/90 02/91 Weekly Interest Rate Averages r.Rnnr. SPr1PS A PrnorAm 04/91 07/91 09/91 11/91 01/92 04/92 06/92 08/92 Merrill hynch F i. wo We mr .r M THE BOND BUYER FRIDAY, JULY 17 .4naivsts Federation Head Says Issuers' List Doubles For Market Disclosure By Vickv Stamas WASHINGTON — The National Federation of Municipal Analvsts has neariv doubled its list of bond :ssuers that have pledged to meet he federation's rigorous standards :or secondary market disclosure. Chairwoman Victoria Westall an- nounced yesterday. Some analvsts have voiced frus- ,ration that the groups call for im- proved disclosure has not met more of a response. But a major bond in- surer has indicated that it consid- ers improved disclosure a top factor when deciding prices. Ms. Westall. director of munici- pal research for Edward D. Jones & Co. In St. Louis. said the following 12 issuers were added to the federa- tion's list: the cities of Chicago. Fort North. Tex.. and Grass Vallev. Calif.: the Village of Buffalo Grove. Ill.: CGH Medical Center of Sterling. :"ease turn 10 A ALYSTS Pare 0 Pages 345.368 Analysts Continued from front page Ill.: the Florida Municipal Power Agency: the Greater Orlando. Fla., Aviation Authority: the intermoun- tain Power Agency in Utah: the North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency: the North Carolina Municipal Power Agency No. One: the Piedmont Municipal Power Agencv in South Carolina: and the Prince William Countv Park Au- thority In Virginia. The additions bring to 22 the to- tal number of cities, counties. and other entities that have adopted resolutions or provided written statements from authorized offi- cials pledging to provide regular au- dited financial statements. com- prehensive financial reports if prepared. and other key credit in- formation about their outstanding bonds. Issuers also must pledge to send periodic credit information to a rat- ing agency for rated deals. And they must state in the introduction to of- ficial statements that they have made these commitments. The announcement comes amid growing frustration among ana- lvsts about what thev view -as the sluggish response by issuers to calls for improved secondary mar- ket disclosure. Federation officials said last week they are putting the final touches on a broad survev that will go to the groups 80b members this summer to gauge tm- provements in the area. To date. no buvers have reported paying a premium for bonds strictly because of the quality of secondary market disclosure. nor have anv in- surers reported giving a discount exclusively for that reason. Market observers sav such statements are unlikely because of the many fac- tors that go into price determi- nations. But the Financial Guarantv In- surance Co. last week clearly indi- cated it is rewarding issuers that provide ongoing disclosure by re- ducing the cost of providing credit enhancements. Pricing "was based on outstand- ing operating performance. strong legal covenants and detailed ongo- ing disclosure." John Cassidy. vice president of Financial Guarantv's utility group. said in a statement announcing that the company had been selected to back an upcoming S 100 million issue of variable -rate certificates of participation by the Countv Sanitation Districts of Ot:- ange County. Calif. Financial Guar- anty said credit enhancement for the issue resulted in an interest - rate savings of roughly S2.5 million over the life of the bond issue. Meanwhile. the upcoming survey by the analvsts federation drew an angry response from at least one municipal official. who said that some issuers have already been providing excellent secondary mar- ket disclosure and that improve- ments by the rest will happen only when they have a price incentive. "Issuers have been painted as the bad guys for not being respon- sive." said John Gunvou. commis- sioner of the Minnesota Depart- ment of Finance and chairman of the Government Finance Officers Association's committee on gov- ernmental debt and fiscal policy. "Why should an issuer respond if the market will always pay him. re- gardless?" Mr. Gunvou continued. "There's no financial incentive. Until investors stop buying paper or attach a penalty to that. people are not going to be responsive. GFOA is encouraging people to do It. Now the other side of the market has to start responding." Mr. Gunvou was critical of a re- cent federation recommendation that issuers declare in official state- ments whether thev will or will not supply ongoing disclosure. "NFMA is hung up on the negative." he said. "Some of us have been doing an excellent job of disclosing for years. But there is no 1pricej differ- entiation." Richard Ciccaronc. chairman of the federation's standards and practices committee. responded to Mr. Gunyou's charges in a tele- phone interview yesterday. "We're in this together." he said. Talking to the association's members is "like singing to the choir." he added. noting that many association members had already been providing ongoing secondary market disclosure. p THE BOND BUYER MONDAY, AUGUST 24 California to Work Away at Budget Gap Following First Big Break in Stalemate By Debora Vrana LOS ANGELES — California lawmakers were expected to work throueh the weekend on ways to bridge the slate's S 11 billion budget gap, after reaching a major break- through on local government policy last week. On Thursday. the Assembly passed and sent to the governor a two-b1U package allowing counties to cut certain health and welfare services. The measure could ease passage of a budget. allowing the state to take $1.3 billion in property tax revenues from local governments. The governor has said he will sign the bills. "This train Is moving. It's picking up speed." Cynthia Katz. spokes- woman for the state Department of Finance. said Friday. "Unless some monkey wrench gets thrown in along the way. we're moving forward." Ms. Katz said a budget plan may be passed over the weekend or this week. Last week's compromise on local government was one of the first major breakthroughs since state leaders failed to reach a budget ac- cord by July 1. the start of the fiscal year. The budget Impasse is the longest in California history. The action on local government would give counties the ability to cut general assistance welfare grants. Impose a 15-day residency requirement for welfare recipients. stop aid to recipients who fail to participate in job programs. and re- duce grants to those who share housing. On the health front. the bills would allow counties to shut down a medical clinic with a 14-day no- tice. The current requirement is 30 days. They would also eliminate a provision requiring counties to hold a hearing to determine any nega- tive Impact of such a closure. " 1t allows counties to do almost as they please as far as health and welfare noes." said Jim Lewis. press secretary for Assembly Speaker Willie Broom. D-San Fran- cisco. The new flexibility for counties may garner enough bipartisan leg- Istative support for a measure to shift S 1.3 billion in aid from cities. counties. and special districts to the state. Mr. Lewis said the Assembly was expected to debate more than 24 budget -related bills on Friday and Saturday. after rejecting Gov. Pete Wilson's new budget proposal on Wednesday. While lawmakers have reached a tentative agreement on local gov- ernment. correctional facilities. and higher education. they were ex- pected this weekend to discuss sev- eral controversial issues. These include cuts to community college funding and the amount of funding schools will be guaranteed under Proposition 98. which re- quires that 40% of the state budget goes to schools. Various budget proposals are pending. but Gov. Wilson s new plan would cut school funds by S 1.49 billion. about S810 million less than he originally proposed in January. Under his proposal. aid to coun- ties would be reduced by $400 mil- lion. cities by $300 million. redevel- opment by S200 million. special districts by S300 million. and vehi- cle license payments from the state to local governments by S 100 million. - The state cannot borrow money without a budget. It has been forced so far to issue $2.8 billion of IOUs. or registered warrants. to pay Its bills. The warrants are issued daily by the state. with an interest rate of 5%. Interest casts to date are 86.8 million. 7 THE BOND BUYER THURSDAY. AUGUST 27 °" TREASURY MARKET Prices Rise, With 346-Year Up 5/8, am Once Market Clears Supply Hurdle By Susan Kellv Treasury prices ended higher yesterday as the market breathed a sigh of relief after getting through the second of this week's two note sales. vesterdav_ 's auction of five- year notes. A weaker than expected report on durable goods orders and the dol- lar's new-found stability against the market also aided the Treasury market yesterday. By late in the afternoon. the 30- _vear bond was up % point to yield 7.41 %. "The auction went pretty well." said Jan Hurley. a market strate- gist at Chase Securities. "The mar- ket's doing better now because the auction's out of the way. we don't have supply again for a month. and the dollar's stable." The 610.5 billion of five-vear notes came at an average yield of 5.74% and will bear a 5%% coupon. That compares to the 5%% cou- pon and 5.56% average yield at last month's five-year sale. The average yield was also the highest yield at which securities were awarded. which showed that bidding for the notes was fairly ag- gressive. The 2.77-to- l ratio of bids en- tered to the size of the auction was average for a five-year sale. while the $590 million of noncompetitive bids from small Investors was weaker than usual. Once the bids were in. the when - issued five-year traded up and took the rest of the market with tt- l.ate yesterday. the new five-year note was yielding 5.67%. well below the 5.74% average at the auction. and traders said the market was pleased with Its quick profit on the issue. The auction "was bought cor- rectly and (the notesi seem to trade well." a government note trader said. Ms. Hurley said some of the price Improvement during the afternoon was a belated reaction to the 3.4% drop In July durable goods orders reported yesterday morning. Trea- sury prices rose only modestly after the Indicator was released. even though it was far below the consen- sus forecast of a 0.5% gain in orders. Traders said that with this week's new securities trading at a profit, the dollar stable. and the economv sell feeble. there was no reason the bond market could not add to its gains in coming days. "We really have no coupon sup- ply for another month. so if we con- tinue to see some retail buying. I think we can trend higher Into the employment report." the note trad- er said. The August Jobs report will be released Sept- 4. But economists said the dollar could prove to be the fly In the ointment. Late yesterday. the dollar was quoted at 1.4072 German marks. up from 1.4015 late Tuesday. The dollar has "stabilized In the Treasury Market Yields I wwrr� P. wee 'thee- i ear 3-Mor at 8i 32) 3.12 324 1 6-mold &t 3= 3.21 3.11 I 1-Yw&a 147 3.33 334 I 2-Year Note 425 199 425 I 3-Yw Nos 4.75 452 4'67 5-Yw Nan 5.65 5.39 +I 5.62 7•Yw Nor 6.1e 5.94 &IQ 1 aYer Nos 6.63 6.45 6.60 15-Yew Bona 7M 6.67 6.95 I 30-Year Bono 7,41 7.31 T" screw rare. ratcomwrawwe last day or so. and that's allowea some of the improvement [in Trea- sury prices) to take place. but there's constant fear the slide will resume." said Steven Slifer. an economist at Lehman Brothers. Ms. Hurley said the market's gains yesterday were limited by worries about the dollar. "This whole rally could be gone tomorrow If we come in and find the dollar's at 1.3900 Imarksl." she said. Mr. Slifer sold the market's con- cern about the dollar could increase as the weekend approaches, be- cause there has been talk of a re- valuation of the exchange-rate mechanism of the European Mone- tary System. something that Is typically done over the weekend. Such a move would boost the mark at the expense of the dollar. Carl Weinberg. chlefeconomist of High Frequency Economics, said there was nothing to prevent the dollar from making new lows against the mark. -'From the point of view of the fundamentals. nothing has Pkuw now w rRF.1.SujuES Purr 28 Treasuries Continued from page 3 changed." Mr. Weinberg said_ "The things that were adverse last week continue to be adverse this week." He said the negatives for the dol- lar included unattractive U.S. yield levels. the "limited amount of zip" In the U.S. bond market. the widen- Ing merchandise trade deficit. and the political uncertainty aroused by the presidential campaign. Analysts said July's durable goods orders were not as weak as the 3.4`X, total decline suggested be. cause most of the drop occurred in the aircraft sector. Airplane orders often post big moves in one dlrec- tlon or the other. Excluding transportation. July durable goods orders rose 0.7%. But even though the report "was not as weak as it looks at first blush. there was enough weakness In enough of the categories to be worried." said Sally Kleinman. a fl- nanclal markets analyst at Chemi- cal Securities. Ms. Kleinman cited the declines In primary metals, which she said probabiv reflected the two -week shutdown at General Motors last month. and- in industrial ma- chinery. Analysts said the 1.4% declln unfilled orders was even more Curbing. It was the 1 I th decline row Mn that component and brat unfilled orders to their lowest l since February 1989. '-As long as the backlogs con ue to fall. manufacturers won't hiring workers to any signiHc degree." said Daniel Seto. an ec omist at Nikko Securities Comp: International. "For the next months. the outlook for growth manufacturing employment pretty grim. President Bush's announcem- yesterday of at "no -fly" zone Southern Iraq did not affect Tr sury prices. traders said. The September bond futures a tract closed 13/33 higher at 10423 In the cash market. the 7V4% year bond was % higher. at 9738; 98. to yield 7.41%. The 6%% 10-year note rose 111 to 9731/32-983/32. to yield 6.63%. The three-year 4%% note was 1k, at 9910/32-9911/32. to yfe 4.75%. In when -issued trading. the 4U two-year note was up 3/33. 99u/33-100. to yield 4.25%. dot from the 4.30% average at Tut day's auction. wo 11.01, rr r ire ud er tw wo tws `ate' err THE BOND BUYER FRIDAY. AUGUST 28 The Municipal Market I By Sean Monsarrat j Tax -Free Prices Show Some Life, Although Supply Lurks on Horizon Municipals regained some lost confidence yesterday. and prices rose about 1/4 point on average. Dollar bonds led the way. with some rebounding one point or more after one of the most severe price corrections since the late 1980s. The market had fallen approxi- mately four points on average since last Friday. As new Issues were postponed and supply thinned. firmer Treasury prices helped municipals get back on more solid ground. Treasury prices fell slightly early yesterday after the tabor Depart- ment reported that Initial state un- employment insurance claims fell 92.000 to a seasonally adjusted 382.000 in the week ended Aug. 15. But the government market re- couped its losses as the focus re- mained on the value of the dollar and Improving technlcals. giving the tax-exempt market support. Although traders were cautious about the market's health. they re- ported Increased secondary activity and a slightly stronger bid side. 'It had a better tone. and the longer we can sustain that the more confidence will develop." a trader Plewe turn to MUNICIPALS Pere ?o Municipals Continued flora front page said late In the day. "Make no mis- take though. there is still a lot of damage out there. and we're not out of the woods vet." Yields on mid -range serial bonds lagged the rest of the market. trad- ers said. remaining mostly un- changed on the day. But dollar bonds posted gains of i4 to 4% point on average and some bonds popped more than one point. For examole, in secondary dollar bond trading. Puerto Rico general obligation 6s of 2014 were quoted at 95%-tf2 to yield approximately 6.39% on the bid side.- The same bond was quoted at 95%-Y4 to yield 6.41% late Wednesday. Reflecting the stronger part of the market. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 6s of 2032 were quoted at 95y4--V4 to yield 6.32%. compared to 9454--4 to yield 6.40% Wednesday. In the debt futures market. the MOB spread continued to narrow as municipals improved over govern- ments. Yesterday. the September municipal contract settled up 74/= to 96.31: the MOB spread narrowed to negative 256 from negative 264 Wednesday. Supply that choked the market the last two weeks has dissipated for the moment. The Bond Buyer's 30-dav visible supply fell $867.4 milllon to S3.74 billion yesterday. while The Blue List of dealer Inven- tory fell S90.9 million to $1.74 billion. The decrease In supply has helped the Street. which is still heavy with bonds. to gain some confidence and momentum. Mar- ket players noted. however. that new deals are expected to continue to hit the primary because Issuers are eager to capture still -low inter- est rates. New Issues The primary sector was relatively quiet yesterday but. In the negotiat- ed sector. Goldman. Sachs & Co. priced and repriced S50 million of Trimble County. Ky.. pollution con- trol revenue bonds for the Louis- ville Gas and Electric Co.. subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. as a remarketing. At the repricing. the reoffering yield was lowered by five basis points. The final pricing included a 2020 bullet maturity. priced as 6.60s at par. The Issue is rated Aa2 by Moody's. and the managers said they expected Standard & Poor's to rate the bonds AA. In follow-through business. Leh- man Brothers freed S350 milllon of Orange County. Cant.. Local Trans- portation Authority Measure M sales tax revenue bonds from syn- dicate restrlcUons. In late secondary trading, the 6s of 2009 were said to be trading at the original reoffering yield. The bonds were originally priced to yield 6.20%. First Boston Corp.. senior man- ager for S 126 million of Charlotte. N.C.. unlimited tax refunding bonds. reported an unsold balance of approximately S16 milllon. Secondary Trading For the first Ume in nearly one week. traders reported some bid - wanted flow in the secondary with an improved bid. Activity centered around bid -wanted lists. Including a customer list in the $23 million range. and an InsUtutlonal list in the S100 million range. Some larg- er bond blocks were said to be changing hands. including 85 mil- lion of California Water 6s of 2020 and S6 million of Virginia Trans- portation 6s of 2019. In other secondary dollar bond trading. ChlcW GO AMBAC 536s of 2022 were quoted at 93-% to yield 6.40%. Florida Board of Educatlon 6s of 2022 were quoted at 9534-96% to yield 6.31 %. and New York City Water Authority 6s of 2017 were quoted at 931h-34 to yield 6.53%. In short-term note trading. yields were unchanged to as much as five to eight basis points lower on the day. In late action. Los Angeles Trans were quoted at 3.15% bid. 3.05% of- fered: Texas Trans were quoted at 3.14% bid. 3.02% offered: and Wis- consin notes were quoted at 3.15% bid. 3.05% offered. New York City Tans were quoted at 2.90% bid. 2.80% offered. and New York State Trans were quoted at 3.15% bid. 3.05% offered. L 40 MW THE BOND BUYER MONDAY, AUGUST 31 Traders Begin Holiday Snooze; Supply Slackens Before Labor Day owl Municipals stabilized by last Fri- 4 lay but will likely stick to a narrow price range during holidav time and move again only wnen underwrit- ers ers sell the next wave of new deals. Prices gained as much as 1/4 point last Thursdav and again on Fridav :is the market began to recover al wo ter one of the most severe price cor- rections in years. The market lost about four points last week as oversupply and a weakening dollar combined to drive bond priers lower. 'o Looking ahead. market players have begun to make progress on their heavy Inventories and The Blue List fell 8150.4 million to 81.59 billion by Friday. ur But 84 billion of new deals are slated to be priced this week. and the shadow calendar remains ro- bust. At least 21 negotiated deals. totaling 81.27 billion. were can- celed last week, and are waiting In the wings. The number of bonds priced by underwriters is likely to determine near -term price prospects. "we've still got a lot of wood to chop, even though there Is light at the end of the tunnel." said one market player Friday. "As long as underwriters don't get carried away. this should be a buying op- portunity for the true investor. The market can handle around SI bil- lion a week. but bring $5 billion of new bonds and vou'll scare everv- bodv away.' The market Is likely to get a break from issuance during the holidav week. and some deals mav be post- poned for a time, but Issuers re- main eager to capture still -low in- terest rates. Looking to supply data. The Bond Buyer's 30-dav visible supply on Friday rose 8626 million. to 54.33 billion. %W Currently scheduled for sale in the competitive sector this week are 8123 million of Denver various - purpose bonds. $100 million of Dade County. Fla.. revenue bonds. ud and S82 million of Los Angeles Mu- nicipal Improvement Corp. revenue bonds. Dominating the negotiated calen- dar are $245 million of Austin. too Tex.. combined utility systems rev- enue refunding bonds. to be priced by Morgan Stanley & Co.: $224 mil- Ifon of Michigan State Housing De- "ram velopment Authority rental hour, - Ing revenue bonds. to be priced by First Boston: and 8200 mflllon of 11- Ilnois Build 1111how revenue bonds. Pkaw tuns to ARWICIPALS Pose I Municipals Continued hom hunt page to be priced by PaineWebber. The value of the dollar will also occupy center stage with supply. The Treasury market lost ground on Fridav as the dollar weakened again: municipals held steady. thanks mostly to inacuvity. The health of the economy. meanwhile. has taken a back seat to technical factors. The importance of Fridav's Au- gust employment report has dlmin- Ished. although It wtil still be watched and a surprise number could move the markets. Bond traders will also look for the results of July single-family home Sales. to be released today: July leading indicators and construction spending. to be released Tuesday: and factory orders and Inventories for July. to be released Wednesday. Friday's Marko! Municipal prices were un- changed to 54 point higher in spots early Friday as the market added to a slightly better tone established on Thursday. But the value of the dollar. began to weaken by mid -session and the Treasury market headed into nega- tive territory. Municipal market players reured from the action as a result. and the market maintained Its gains. In the debt futures market. the September municipal contract set- tled up 11/32. to 97.10. Secondary dollar bond quotes were unchanged to S4 point better near the close. In late trading. Chicago GO AM- BAC 53%s of 2022 were quoted at 93u4--% to yield 6.38%. Puerto Rico 6s of 2014 were quoted at 95-%--% to yield 6.39%. and Florida Board of Education 6s of 2022 were quoted at 96-% to yield 6.29%. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power tis of 2032 were quoted at 95%-44 to yield 6.3 1 % and New York City Wa- ter Authority 6s of 2017 were quoted at 94-1A to yield 6.48%. In the short-term note sector. yields were unchanged to as much as five basis points higher on the day. traders said. In late action. Los Angeles tax and revenue anticipation notes were quoted at 3.15% bid. 3.10% of- fered. Texas Trans were quoted at 3.16% bid. 3.10% offered. and Wis- consin notes were quoted at 3.15% bid. 3.10% offered. New York City tax anticipation notes were quoted at 2.90% bid. 2.195% offered. and New York State Tian were quoted at 3.20% bid. 3.22% offered. O W tr ttt•I Will sad No aI� to bid t1W tali tqd bw `7t/ THE BOND BUYER MONDAY. AUGUST 31 California Arms To Beat Clock On Debt Service With Fiscal Plan By Patrice Hill 'WASHINGTON — California offl clals were struggling Friday to tea down remaining obstacles to pay ing the debt service on $2.2 blllloi of lease revenue bonds that com, due tomorrow. The -state Senate was preparini to vote on a compromise budge drafted by Senate President Davit Roberti. D-Los Angeles. and Senate Republican Leader Ken Maddy o Fresno. Legislators hoped to com plete action on the budget and plact :t on Gov. Pete Wilson s desk bt today. The governor s signature on such a plan. which contains appropria- (ions for the bonds' lease pay- ments. would ensure Umely pay- ment for all 13 state Issues that have $109 million of debt service due tomorrow. stale officials said. Meanwhile. state Controller Gray Davis' office worked all day Frldav to Iron out a remaining legal wrin- kle that has prevented the control. ler from providing state Treasurer Kathleen Brown with the cash to make payment on most of the bonds even without an enacted budget. The controller called In "a host of lawyers" to provide an opinion showing he has the authority to use cash on hand to make the lease bond payments through the gov- ernment's "continuing approprta- dons" authority, said Marsha Kwaidwasser. deputy to Mr. Davis. "It's a question of tightening up the opinion. I expect this will be re- solved today. but we must be satls- fled that everything Is proper." she said Friday. "We are looking at some legal Issues that haven't been raised since the 1930s." At Issue was whether Section 13340 of the government code. Please turn to CALIFORNIA Page fo California Continued from front page unich "sunsets the government's continuing appropriations author- !tv for some programs when a oud- tiethas not been enacted. could pre. , ent the controller from maxing the pavments. state oillcials said. The -.late has oeen ooeraune without a `ormai budget since July 1 . Once this remaining legal hurdle 9 cleared. the state will have tiavea is wav to making tomorrow s bond -ayments. she said. On Thursoay. -tale Finance Director Thomas W. �Iavep provided Mr. Davis with ad- litlonal autflorILV that he nerds to 'n axe [he payments by cerulving '!'tat the Leglslature had not as vet approved the lease appropriations. %fr. Haves certification should rnable the state to avoid tapping ntodeat service reserves to pay the lcbt service on 1 1 of the 13 bond is- sues with payments due tomorrow. state officials said. The roughly $2 billion of issues are all by the Mate s Public Works l3oard. ,)tie of the other two issues with ::avments due. a 1991 Department A Transportation to the East WV Building Authority certificates of parucipauon issue. is expected to be paid out of capitalized interest funds. rating officials said. -anted. said Ihev would like to see :he legislation enacted to orevent lnv future 'scares over the lease oonas. - lime major faune agencies last Week put some or au of the states :ease revenue bonds on credit alert. pending resolution at the lease pay- ment problem. Fitch Investors Ser- ice. in a release late Thursoay. ex- tended its alert in the state's GO .:rbt as well as to its lease -secured ,:ands. 711e unwillingness of the state to Insulate Its obligations to bond- holders Irom Its internal budget Jisoute is extremely negative to overall credit." Fitch maintained. `.Ioodv's Investors Service and Standard & Poor s Corp. had warned that the state should spe- citically avoid dipping into the debt service reserves to pay the bonds. Standard & Poor s Vice President Jeffrev J. Thelmann said resorting to the debt service reserves would be a kind of "technical default." George Leung. Moodv s managing director for state ratings. termed it a 'oavment default." Mate mflclals from Ms. Brown on ,sown have protested that the use of the debt service reserves does not constitute an event of default under the bond Indentures for most of the Issues. California's controller called into host of lawyers' for on opinion showing he can use cash on hand to make the lease bond payments, an aide says. in addition. the state made head- wav Friday in its efforts to find the :unds to pay a final bond Issue — .t 3163.5 million series 1988 Los An. :eles State Building Authority issue — without having to resort to the use of debt service reserves. they ,iald. With hopes rising that the state Legislature could complete a budget .agreement by Manday. lawmakers on Frfdav tabled emergency legisla- tion that would authorize payment )t the lease obligations out of exlst- Ing revenues without dipping into the reserve funds. "There is a 95% chance we will have a budget by Itodavl. so we ve put the bill on file for now." David Takashima. legislative analyst for Assemblyman Steve Peace. D-San Diego. who chairs the Assembly's Banking. Finance. and Bonded In- debtedness Committee. said Fri- day. "But if there Isn't a budget. we may take up the bill" today. The legislation would put In place permanent authority for the state to make rental and energy service contract payments without an en- acted budget. and thus would pro- hibit this year's lease payment de- bacle from reoccurring. Gov. Wilson has signaled that he does not support the emergency legislation and would prefer to take the administrative route being paved by the controller's otflce. However. rating agency officials. who have been watching the state's machinations over the lease bonds closely to determine whether an- other mind n(.[n•v.e.-..a» •- _.__ he Indentures cicarly speclfv what would represent a default. and using the reserve is not Idenu- tied as one of those conditions. ' %aid George Valverde. assistant Inxiget manager sit the state De- parurient of Finance. who plays a rote in making bond payments an the Public Works Board Issues. Fitch agreed in its release. "The use of the reserve funds. while an indication that debt service don nit hold a sacrosanct position. Is not of Itself that "auve. if mplen- Ished. since a major purpose of the reserve is to protect against Late budget adoption." the agency said. Fitch nevertheless said the inci- dent raises larger issues about the state's creditworthiness. Mr. Leung also agreed that the In- dentures do not define use of the debt service reserves as a default. and noted that Moody's has been careful not to use that word in its releases. But he said that to some extent. whether it Is considered a default is "in the eyes of the be- holder." We distinguish between a big 'd' where the bondholder is not paid. and a tittle'd.' " wherethedebt ser- vice reserves are accessed. he said. "The bigger issue is that resort- ing to the reserve funds raises the issues of the willingness of the state to appropriate. as well as how it re- gards the Importance of meeting Its debt service obligation In a respon- stble manner to protect its payment record." he said. Debora Vrana contributed to thu or Municipal Market By Sean htonsarrat Tax -Free Prices Rise About 1/8; New Issuance Light This Week Municipal prices were un- changed to kh point higher In dull holiday trading yesterday as the market continued Its slow recovery from last week's puce drops. Prices improved slightly for the third session In a row yesterday af- ter the crushing blows suffered ear- ly last week. Tax -exempts took their lead from the Treasury market yesterday but worries over a weaker dollar and concern about the release of August employment data Friday prevented both markets from accomplishing much. Treasury traders were hesitant enough so that not even weak eco- nomic data were able to Inspire more than a slight move higher. Municipals rose about %. Sales of new single-family homes in July fell 2.6%. to a seasonally ad - lusted annual rate of 563.000. the Commerce Department reported. Most analysts expected a modest i!atn of I % to 3% in July. The decline followed a revised ..3.3% gain in June sales, originally reported as a 7.9% gain. In addition. the Chlcagoland business barometer decreased to 58.4% In August on a seasonally adjusted basis from 59.2% In July. Please turn to MUNICIPA S Page.i8 THE BOND BUYER TUESDAY. SEPTEMBER 1 Municipals Continued bvm front We the Purchasing Management Asso- ciation of Chicago said. An Index reading below 50% sig- nals a slowing economy. while a level above 50% suggests ex- pansion. In the debt futures market. the September municipal contract set- tled down J/32. to 97.07. A break from new Issuance gave the Street some breathing room to work on inventory. The Bond Buver's 30-day visible supply rose to S4.98 billion. but The Blue List fell $90.6 million. to $1.5 billion. Through Aug. 28. $150.7 billion of new issues have been priced this year. compared to S 104.7 billion for the same period In 1991. a 43.91 % Increase. New Issuance was light yester- day. dominated by Goldman. Sachs & Co.'s pricing of S130 million Ta- coma. Wash.. Electric System re- funding revenue bonds in the nego- tiated sector. At the repricing. yields on the 2009 and 2010 maturities were lowered by five basis points. The final reoffering scale includ- ed serial bonds priced to yield from 4.60% In 1996 to 6.25% In 2009. A 2012 term. contalrrfng $33 million of the loan. was priced as 51hs to yield 6.25%. The Issue is insured by the AM- BAC Indemnity Corp. and Is triple- A rated by Moody's Investors Ser- vice and Standard & Poor's Corp. In follow-through business. Smith Barney. Harris Upham & Co. as senior manager freed $296 ma - lion of Clark County. Nev.. McCar- ran international Airport passen. ger facility charge revenue bonds from syndicate restrictions. In late secondary trading. the AMBAC-Insured 6s of 2022 were quoted at 6.35% bid. 6.34% offered. The bonds were originally priced to yield 6.35%. Secondary Trading Activity was dominated by some small bid -wanted lists and some small block of bonds. In secondary dollar bond trading. Prices were unchanged to up as much as 54 point on the day. In late trading. Chicago GO 5%9 of 2022 were quoted at 93V4-W4 to yield 6.38%. Puerto Rico GO 6s of 2014 were quoted at 95-%--Y4 to yield 6.39%. and Florida Board of Educa- tion 69 of 2022 96V4-I6 to yield 6.27%. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 6s of 2032 were quoted at 95%-95-Y4 to yield 6.31 % and New York City Water Authority 6s of 2017 were quoted at 94-94'h to yield 6.48%. In the short-term note market. yields were five to seven basis points lower on the day. In late trading. Los Angeles Trans were quoted at 3.08% bid. 3.05% offered. Texas Trans were quoted at 3.05% bid. 3.03% offered. and Wisconsin notes were quoted at 3.08% bid. 3.05% offered. New York City Tans were quoted at 3.03% bid. 3% offered. and New York State Trans were quotes 3.15% bid. 3.10% offered. Postponed Deals PaineWebber Inc.. senior man er for S250 million Illinois refui Ing bonds scheduled to be negoti ed this week. said the deal has be postponed. The Issue joins 27 other be deals set for negotiated pricing ti have been placed on a "day-to-da basis because of unstable mart conditions. wo t" wo 4" kw t" tod No aw To: Sonia Payne From: Steve Coma/Melissa Waters Re: $98,500,000 Certificates of Participation County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3,6,7 & 11 of Orange County, California Deal Number: Dated Date: Sale Date: Delivery Date: Delivery Location: Bond Counsel & Closing Location: Time: Trustee/Paying Agent: Funds Due at Closing: 045-24442 September 1,1992 September 1,1992 September 1, 1992 New York, NY Edward W. Long, Esq./Carolyn Clark, Esq. Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon 333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2020 Los Angeles, CA 90071 213/613-1112 FAX:213/680-1358 8:00 am PST Steve Rivero State Street Bank & Trust Co. of California 725 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213/362-7345 FAX:213/362-7357 $97,958,250.00 Owl 6Z Merrill Lynch COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 108" ELLIS AVENUE P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 1714) 952-2411 RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS SEPTEMBER 9, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. D F� FUN NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AF43 CCUNTY SANITATICN DISTRICTS OF CRANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/12/92 POSTING DATE 08/12/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123917 AC TECH COMPANY $629741.98 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 123918 ASP ANALYSIS S880.00 ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS 123919 ACADEPIC FRESS S282.31 LAB SUPPLIES 123920 ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC S310.00 LAB 223921 ACCU - SLUDGE $622.52 SLUDGGEE SAMPLER 123922 ACTICN RENTALS 12:602.00 EQUIPMBNT RENTALS 123923 ADVANCO CCNSIRUCTPRS INC S906462.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-3, P1-35-2, J-21 n 123924 AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS I S229571.18 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN SYST M.O.8-9-89 C' 123925 ALCORN FENCE CO $29160.00 FENCING m 123926 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 312*500.00 ASPHALT d 123927 ALFHACA2 $19233927 SPECIALTY GASES n 123528 HEPMAh-FHINNEY-KCEYUR 110049.39 MACHINE PARTS 123929 AVER SCCIETY OF CIVIL ENGR $995.00 PUBLICATION 123930 ROBCO INC &/OR AMERICAN SEALS S467.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES m 123931 AMERICAN SIGMA S19168.31 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3 123932 APER SOCIETY FCR MICROBIOLC S312.00 PUBLICATION 123533 APEPICAh IVPE CLLTURE CCLLECTN $228.75 LAB SUPPLIES � 123934 AhCREWvS CLASS CC $79201#80 LAB SUPPLIES 123935 AQUATIC TESTING LABORATORY S49900.00 LAB SERVICES 1 123936 ARATEX SERVICES INC $39553.71 UNIFORM RENTALS 123937 ARTZCNA INSTRUMENT S29157.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123938 RALPF W ATKINSCN $19417907 PUMP r 123535 RAhCCLPF AUSTIN CC S849.94 TUBING 123940 BKK LANCFILL S79214.98 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 t=j 123941 BRW SAFETY & SUPPLY $19169945 SAFETY SUPPLIES C/) 223942 BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE S32.00 BACKFLOW TESTING 123943 RALLIN CCNSTRLCTICN CO $69390.00 MANHOLE COVERS 123944 BARCLAYS LAW FLBLIShERS S168.38 PUBLICATIONS 123545 PA71EPY SFECIALIIES S705.66 BATTERIES 123946 BAXTER CIACNOSTICS INC S159373.42 LAB SUPPLIES Cn 123947 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS S19200.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 123948 RIO TECH NET• INC S163.71 SERVICE AGREEMENT 123949 BCFHPINGEF MAhNHEIM $101929 LAB SUPPLIES 123950 BPINCERSCN CCRF S59954.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 123951 BRCWh & CALCWELL CONSULTING $719723.72 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-12-1 123952 BUDGET JANITORIAL S19650.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 123953 BUILDERPS EMPORIUM S216.80 HARDWARE 1239°4 PURKE ENGINEERING CC S809.58 ELECTRIC PARTS 1239ES GARY G STREEC S19846.71 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 1239E6 BUTLER FIFER CCPPAhY $72.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123957 C M I S29375.42 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 123958 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS9 INC $454.23 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 123959 CAL -PAC CHEMICAL CO INC S201.90 CHEMICALS 123960 CALTRCL INC S39284.38 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123961 JC14K R CALAFPICE FhC 9189388.55 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.11-14-90 123962 CALIFCRNIA AUTC CCLLISION INC S844.37 TRUCK PARTS a N FURD NC 919Q - JT CIST WCRKINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 FAGF 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCLK7Y SANITATICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID (^8/12/92 POSTING DATE 08/12/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123963 CALIFCRNIA AUTOMATIC GATE S908.74 SERVICE AGREEMENT 123964 CALIFCRNIA JCURKAL INC $167000 TRAINING REGISTRATION 123965 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC FINANCE S545.00 PUBLICATION 123966 CFNTER FOR STUDY OF LAW B POLI $64.65 PUBLICATIONS 1239E7 CENTIRY SAFETY INST A SUFP $69374.56 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123968 ChEVFCN (SA 1RC S59391.05 OIL & GREASE 123969 ChILCRENOS HCSPITAL CF O.C. S154.54 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT D 123970 SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING S89563.42 BUILDING MATERIALS +m 123971 CLEAN -EX FAPER A CHEMICAL S407.55 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES m Z 123972 ThE COEB GRCUP $127.15 COMPUTER SOFTWARE C! 12�973 CCPFASS ELEC70CKICS CCRP S54.35 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS D 123974 CCPFUSA• INC. S19220.15 COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE 123975 CONAPDOS PHOTOGRAPHY $269.38 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 123976 CONSCLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST S89010.74 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES m 123977 CCRTINENTAL AIR TOCLS INC S398.90 TOOLS 3 123978 CCCPER IRCLS7RIES INC $139728.16 COMPRESSOR PARTS 123979 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S615.79 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 123900 CRANE VEYOR CORP $74.21 SAFETY SUPPLIES Cb 1239FI THE REGENTS CF THE UNIVERSITY $69145.00 NWRI PROJECT FEES 123582 CA CEFT CF HEALTh SERVICES $49808000 REGISTRATION - LAB ACCREDITATION 123523 STATE CF CALIFCRNIA $13.306.09 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE n 123984 DE ANZA CORFCRATION S150000 EQUIPMENT RENTALS r r 123985 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS S189.53 LAB SUPPLIES 123986 DEW -PAR SALES A SERVICE S536.55 MANHOLE PARTS t= 1239P7 DEZURTK AND/CR CS CO S19715.39 VALVE PARTS 123908 CIATEC EK%IRCNPERTAL S39894.79 CHEMICALS 1239E9 CIFILIPFC ASSCCIATES S19224.58 PRINTING 123990 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP S39674.36 OFFICE EQUIPMENT �-, 123991 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $132.01 OFFICE SUPPLIES C7 123552 DORADC ERTERFRISES INC S219459.4C PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS 12395Z RCRERT F ERIVER ASSCC S3.700.07 BOND -COMP INSURANCE 123554 CLNR ECUIRCS CCRP S539.96 PAINT SUPPLIES 123995 CYNA7ECh LABCRATCRIES S189012.71 LAB EQUIPMENT 123996 EASTMAN INC S49777.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123997 DONALD ELDER S29166.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 123998 ENCHANTER INC $5s040.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91 123959 FALCCN CISPCSAL SERVICE S39640.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 124CCC JChN B FALKENSTEIN FE S39400630 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16 124001 FARR SALES A SERVICE S89317.03 FILTERS 124002 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP S316.00 AIR FREIGHT 124043 FERRELLGAS $102.07 PROPANE 124004 FISChER I PCRTER CO S982.70 CHLORINATION PARTS 1240-05 FISHER SCIEN71FIC CC $169.36 LAB SUPPLIES 124CC6 FISCRS 1N:TRLPEN7S S2229023.19 LAB EQUIPMENT M.0.2-19-92 124067 FLC-SYSTEPS $69350.81 PUMP PARTS 124008 CLIFFORD A FOPKERT $69445.85 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 N a I W FUND NC 9199 - JT CIST WCRKINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 FAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/12/92 POSTING DATE 08/12/92 WARRANT NC. VENCCR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124005 FCLNIAIN VALLEY CAMERA $66.64 FILM 12401D CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $49316.80 WATER USE 124n11 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT S316.30 PAINT SUPPLIES 124012 FCR INDUSTRIAL SALES S248.46 OFFICE FURNITURE 124013 GMC TRUCK A BUS CROUF $139215.54 VEHICLE 124C14 CSTV INC. $19001084 COMPUTER SOFTWARE D 124015 GANAFL LLPHER CO $516.86 HARDWARE G) 124016 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $3 054.73 CHEMICALS m 224917 GENERAL ELECTRIC CC S840.00 ELECTRIC REPAIRS Z t7 124018 GENERAL ELECTRIC SLPPLY CC. S804.52 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 124015 GIFRLTCI--117CFELL INC 5366.71 MECHANICAL PARTS 124020 GRAPHIC CCNTROLS S347.94 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES '-' 124021 DON GREEK 9 ASSOCIATES $16*606*UC• SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 m 124022 HAAKER EGLIFPENT CC $19679959 VALVE 3 124023 HACH CCPFANY S389.28 CHEMICALS 124024 HARRINGTCN INCLSIRIAL FLAS7I S29.05 VALVE 124025 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $39805.00 TRASH REMOVAL 00 124026 EG HELLERSS SON INC $98.72 TOOLS 1 124027 HEWLETT FACKARC $39665.50 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 124028 HICKS INC. FIEERCLASS CCRP 5100.00 FIBERGLASS REPAIRS 3:- 124029 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC $674.73 MECHANICAL PARTS 124030 HORIZON HIGH REACH S EQUIP $179.48 TRUCK PARTS r 124031 J.T. HORVATH d ASSOC. S39000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17 t7 124032 RS HUGHES CC INC $19268.06 SAFETY SUPPLIES � 1240:3 HUNTER CCFFCRATICN S193579302.32 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 --q 124034 CITY OF 1-UNTING70N BEACh $20.41 WATER USE 124035 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA $266.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES �-+ 124036 HYPROTEX INC $8 045.55 OIL C7 124037 IPC INDLS7RIES S237.28 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES � 1240!P. THE IDEA EANK S111.13 PUBLICATION 124039 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $269271.98 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-14-90 124040 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRCDLCTS S935.54 CONNECTORS 124041 TNFCTRIEVE $51.00 PUBLICATION 124042 INGRAP PAPER $39349.52 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124043 INTERMOUNTAIN SCIENTIFIC CORP $275.63 LAB SUPPLIES 124()44 PACTEL TELETRAC S376.81 NOTEBOOK COMPUTER RENTAL 124045 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEPS $29306.07 BATTERIES 124046 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT S19879o,448.27 SEWAGE CAPACITY PURCHASE M.0.6-10-92 124047 IRVINE RANCH IAIER CISTRICT S124.27 WATER USE 124048 JLA CRECIT CCRP S145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE 124049 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP S19200.29 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124050 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO $49868.23 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1240E1 JCHNS70KE SLPPLY $64.38 ELECTRIC PARTS 1240P2 KARS• ACVANCEE MATERIALS INC $41944000 LAB SERVICES 1240!3 THE KEI7F CCPFANIES $824.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35 124F154 KELLY SERVICES S705.33 TEMPORARY SERVICES il D I VJ D 1 FUND NC 9199 - JT CIST WCRKINC CArITAL PROCESSING DATE 8107192 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNTY SANI7ATICN DISTRICTS OF GRANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID U8/12/92 POSTING DATE 08/12/92 WARRANT NO. VFNDCR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1240°C_ KING REAFING INC S299.61 MACHINE SUPPLIES 124056 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES S19339.42 PAINT SUPPLIES 124057 MARTIN KORDICK SR S39264.60 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 1240°8 LNP ENGINEERING PLASTICS S29885.71 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 124DE9 LA CELLLLAR TELEFFCNE CC $481.38 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 124C(0 LA LIOLIC HANCLING SYSTEMS 1793.75 MECHANICAL PARTS 124061 LAB SUFFCRT S585.00 TEMPORARY SERVICES n 124062 LAYMAN• JONES S DYE9 LAWYEPS S89967.G1 LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER INDUSTRIES C) 124063 ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION $200.00 PUBLICATIONS m 124064 LEGI-TECF S550.00 COMPUTER SERVICES :z 124065 LTPITCRCLE CCRF $124.68 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES L7 124066 SOCC••LYNCF CCRP $878.12 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124067 MFS 195.90 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 124168 MACOMCO S668.85 SERVICE AGREEMENT 124CE9 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS INC S29991.52 MECHANICAL PARTS r 124070 MANOIC PE70RE $120@00 TOWING SERVICES 3 124071 MANHCLE ADJUSTING S89910.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING SERVICES t1t 124072 MANLEYI'S ROILEP REPAIR CO• INC $39515.84 BOILER REPAIRS 00 124073 MAP.VAC ELECTRONICS $19.50 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124074 MATT - ChLCR INC $19235.22 CHLORINATION PARTS 124075 D A MATTFELS B ASSCCIATES $19764.00 INSTRUMENT D 124076 CCN MALPFF S59790.00 OCEAN MONITORING r- 124077 MC AFEE ASSCCIATES $59469.75 COMPUTER SOFTWARE LICENSE r 124078 MCKENNA ENGR 8 EQUIP S196.01 PUMP PARTS d 124079 MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS INC $419.86 INSTRUMENT PARTS r-r 124080 MICRCSOFT CORF $159.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE C/3 224081 PIKKES07A LESTERN VISUAL PPES. $545.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124C82 P17CFELL INSTRUMENT CC $372.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 70 124083 MCOICCN9 INC $943900 ENGINEERING SERVICES C") 124084 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $99982.06 LAB SERVICES --A 124C85 MOTICN INDUSTRIES INC S19159.00 MECHANICAL PARTS Cn 1240EG MUGGE ROSE CUTHRIE ALEXANCE $79126.42 FINANCIAL SERVICES M.0.3-13-91 124CEI NATICNAL SAFETY CCLNCIL $69.35 SAFETY FILM RENTAL 124088 NATICNAL LATER RESEARCH $24*143.00 WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE GRANT 124089 NEWARK ELECTRONICS 1698.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124n90 CITY OF NEWPORT NLACH $4.25 WATER USE 124051 DX SYSTEMS CC $219577.68 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91 124092 CRANCE CCLNTY ALTC PARTS C $40.81 TRUCK PARTS 124C53 CPANCE C(LNTY CFEMICAL CC S29645.92 CHEMICALS 124094 GRANGE VALVE S FITTING CC. S19587.39 FITTINGS 124095 ORITEX CORP 319200.19 MECHANICAL PARTS 124096 OXYGEN SERVICE S760.51 SPECIALTY GASES 124057 PC SYSTEMS DESIGN $483.89 COMPUTER HARDWARE 124058 PCL FACRICINC $316.95 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 124099 PST $434.61 MECHANICAL PARTS 124100 PACIFIC PARTS S349.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS `C C a � lJ"I FUND NC 9199 - J1 DIST h(FKING CAFIIAL PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/12/92 POSTING DATE 08/12/92 WARRANT NC. VEACOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124101 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CC S658.51 SAFETY SUPPLIES 12411i2 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $272.14 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 124103 PAK LEST S19319.3R JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124104 PARA(CN CABLE S36.78 CABLE SERVICES 124105 FERKIN-ELFER CCPFCRATION $833.22 LAB SUPPLIES 1241Jt PIPA GRC SYSTEMS INC S2479161.60 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 124107 FLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE 544.08 HARDWARE D 124108 POLYMETRICS• INC. $109423.14 EQUIPMENT RENTALS rn 124109 PCLYPUPE INC $249123.05 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 Z 124110 PCSITIVE FCRP,LLATCRS9 INC. S241.50 CHEMICALS t= 124111 PREMIER FRINTING CORP. $49834.75 PRINTING 124112 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $262.50 ICE 124113 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. S49720.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 124114 QUESTRON CCRF $179157.00 LAB EQUIPMENT m 124115 RJE 1NTERNATICNAL9 INC $732.31 LAB SUPPLIES 3 12411E RD SYSIEFS IAC $29222.00 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 124117 RECYC INC S449840.82 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91 OO 124118 REGIONAL MEDIA LABORATORY S641.57 LAB SUPPLIES 124119 MCJUNKIN-FEPUPLIC SUFPLY S1*893.97 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1 124120 RCYAL BLSINESS FCRMS INC S534.86 PRINTING 124121 RCYCE INSTRLMENI S232.38 INSTRUMENT PARTS n r-- 124122 RYAN-NERCO S19777.88 METER r- 124123 JOSEPH T RYERSON 8 SON IN S464.08 METAL 124124 SAFELY-KLEEN CGPF S173.40 PARTS CLEANER d 124125 SANTA FE 1NCUSTRIAL PLASTICS $3.907*72 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 124126 SCI-UlhG AFERICA 3309.46 PUMP PARTS -�j 1241P.7 SEA COAST DESICAS S118.52 OFFICE EQUIPMENT ;V 124128 CITY OF SEAL BEACH S285.50 WATER USE §-_) 124129 SEL SALES INC $752.34 METER 4 124130 SHAMRCCK SUPFLY S118.39 HARDWARE C/) 124131 SHURELUCK SALES $140163089 HARDWARE 1241.12 SIGMA CHEPICAL CO S40.26 PUBLICATIONS 124133 SKILL FATHe INC. S198.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 124134 SKYPARK WALK■IN MECICAL CLI S1v614.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 124139 SMITh P I F E E SLFPLY INC $251.80 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1241L6 SCLTPERN CALIF EDISCN CC $3319579.82 POWER 124137 STAMLN 2 SPASSOFF FE $39920.U0 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.3-11-92 124138 WESTALLOY INC $19391.41 WELDING SUPPLIES 124139 STAPLES $89.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124140 STAR TCCL 6 SUPPLY CC $69087.88 TOOLS 124141 STERLING ART S93.02 ART SUPPLIES 124142 STROPPOTNE PRINTING S39728.15 PRINTING 124143 SUMMIT STEEL $737.4C METAL 124144 SUN ELECTRIC CORP S232.37 TRUCK PARTS 124145 SUPER ICE CCRP $81.76 LAB SUPPLIES 124146 SUP-LITE CCRPCRATION $551.34 MECHANICAL PARTS D 1,11 Z :E--x I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8107/92 PAGE 6 C REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIPS PAIC 06/12/92 POSTING DATE 08/12/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124147 SYSTAT S205.LO COMPUTER SOFTWARE 124148 TCH ASSCCIATES S421.00 LAB SUPPLIES 124149 TAYLCR-CINA PFG CCPFAAY S390.42 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 124150 TE90HAULICS $59064932 MACHINE REPAIRS 124151 TELAUTOGRAPH CORPORATION S168.35 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 124152 THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL 5184.44 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124153 THCMAFON PECHANICAL COPP $19600.00 PUMP REPAIRS n 124154 THCPPSCN 1NCUSTRIPL SLPFLY $22.82 MECHANICAL PARTS m 124155 7CNYIS LCCK & SAFE SERVICE S96.55 LOCKSMITH SERVICES m 124156 TOYO LANCSCAPING CO S1.555.00 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.11-13-91 z 124157 TRANSCHEM SIr043.68 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT d D 124158 TRUCK R AUTO SUPPLY INC $230.71 TRUCK PARTS 124159 THE LNISCLP.CE CCRF $363.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124160 UNITEC PARCEL SERVICE $315.19 PARCEL SERVICES m 1241E1 VCC TESTING S7*D00.00 EMISSIONS TESTING 3 124162 VLR SCIENTIFIC S89848.37 LAB SUPPLIES 124163 VS SYSTEMS INC $155.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124164 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO S19145.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 00 1241E5 VARIAN .ANALYTICAL INSTRUPENTS $19123.53 LAB SUPPLIES 124166 VILLAGE NLRSERTES $60.64 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES I 124167 HAYLCRTt• IACCRPCRATEC $805.97 OFFICE FURNITURE D 124168 YESTERN STATES CFEMICAL SUPPLY $509183.96 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90 r 124169 WESTIN ENGINEERING S29167.20 ENGINEERING SERVICES r 124170 WESCO $2*541.40 ELECTRIC PARTS t:l 124171 YHATPAN LAB SALES INC $25.85 LAB SUPPLIES P-4 124172 WHITNEY PACHINERY INC S19508.58 TRUCK PARTS C/7 124173 6OVE4LY9 TAC $329.93 LAB SUPPLIES --I 124174 YERCX CCRP $89948080 COPIER LEASES pa 124175 ZIEbARTH R ALPER/C.S. ALPER $409000.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 Cn TOTAL CLAIKS FAIL OP/12/92 $599249171.15 ----------------- ----------------- D I C31 i v FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/07/92 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/12/92 POSTING DATE 08/12/92 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $595.00 #2 OPER FUND $9,143.84 #2 CAP FAC FUND $6,022.15 #3 OPER FUND $24,773.87 G'l #5 OPER FUND $10,752.02 M #5 CAP FAC FUND $4,831.90 d #7 OPER FUND $2,917.07 #7 CAP FAC FUND $1,882,094.30 #11 OPER FUND $6,691.01 #14 OPER FUND $82.24 RI #14 CAP FAC FUND $6,869.80 3 #5&6 OPER FUND $203.65 #6&7 OPER FUND $3,813.12 #7&14 OPER FUND $170.39 00 JT OPER FUND $1,003,566.85 CORF $2,815,662.45 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $0.00 b JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $145,981.49 r-------------- ;5,924,171.15 f/) f7 -i C/) a C7d FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE I REPORT NUMBER AP43 I-Z COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAIC 08/26/92 POSTING DATE O8/26/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124193 AG TECH COMPANY 5729305.35 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 124154 ASR ANALYSIS S29380000 ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS 124155 A T 8 T $39660.89 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 124196 AMERICAN TELEFHONE 8 TELEGMAPh $19504.01 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 124197 A T 8 T $380.04 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 12419R AkWA/WPCF RESIDUALS MGMT $29.93 LAB SUPPLIES 124199 ACACEPIC FRESS $389.51 LAB SUPPLIES 1242I0 AIR COLC SLFFLY INC $646.50 AIR CONDITIONER SUPPLIES D 124201 AIR FRCDLCTS & CHEMICAL IN 5169815.00 O&H AGREEMENT OXY GEN SYST M.O.8-9-89 m 124202 RCBCC INC 6/CR APERICAN SEALS 559.22 PUMP PARTS m 124203 AMERSHAM CCRP S344080 LAB SUPPLIES z d 1242C4 KETEPA INC $19052.10 MECHANICAL PARTS � 124205 ANAHEIM SEWER CCNSTRUCTION 529009.85 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS 124206 ABC LABORATORIES 519630.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 124.207 ART SUPPLY WHSE $87.59 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES rn 124208 DENTAL INSLRANCE CONSULT. $48.00 DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATOR 3 124209 BRk SAFETY 8 SUPPLY $19935.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES 12421C EANANA ELIEFRINT 539393.13 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES 124211 B BATEPAN 5600.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 00 124212 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $185.82 BATTERIES 124213 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC 5109259.25 LAB SUPPLIES 124214 J & H SERGE INC 5222.85 LAB SUPPLIES n 124215 PERTECH 5526.06 ELECTRIC PARTS 124216 BCLSA RACIATCR SERVICE 5857.55 TRUCK REPAIRS 124217 BON -A -RUES $208.88 TRUCK PARTS C� 124218 DUILDERfS EMPORIUM 5256.11 HARDWARE/LUMBER '-' 124219 BUSH AAC ASSCCIATES INC S19580000 SURVEY SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 � 124220 GARY G STP.EEC 559455.92 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 124221 BUTLER PAFER COMPANY $737.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124222 CEPA ST5.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES C7 124223 CH2M HILL $699000 ENGINEERING SERVICES ---1 124224 SUMMIT SOLLTICNS9 INC $454.23 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT C/3 124225 CS CCMPANY $101.77 GAUGE 12422E CACDVLAK SVSIEPS INC 5193.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124227 CAL -GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. 5720.29 LAB SUPPLIES 124228 CALTROL INC 5109180.50 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124229 CALIFCRNIA AUTO CCLLISION INC $19403.94 TRUCK REPAIRS 124230 CENTLRY SAFETY INST 8 SUFV 549662936 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1242!1 Cl- ACPE CFANKSHAFT INC $570.00 FITTINGS 124232 SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING 539002.99 BUILDING MATERIALS 124233 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT 559881.78 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1242!4 COLICH AND SONS 5291959291.00 CONSTRUCTION I-9 124235 CCLTCN EQUIPMENT CC $485977 TRUCK PARTS 1242!6 CCMPITER FPOCICTS PLLS 5166.47 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124237 CCNPLSA9 INC. $39831.e2 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE 124238 CONARD'S PHOTOGRAPHY 5269.38 PHOTO SERVICES t» N FUND NC 9199 , JT DIST �(RKINC CAF17AL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/26/92 POSTING DATE 08/26/92 m 3 Zm 00 D r r C= P--4 Cn C7 GO WARRANT NC. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124239 CONNELL GM FARTS / DIV 52%744.22 TRUCK PARTS 124240 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $59254.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 124241 CCNTINENTAL AIR TOCLS INC S19840.97 TOOLS 124242 CCNTINENTAL CHEMICAL CC $29155000 CHLORINE M.O.9-9-91 124243 CCNTRACICFIS ECCK STCRE $19213.50 PUBLICATIONS 124244 CCCPFR INCUSTRIES INC $378.17 COMPRESSOR PARTS 124245 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 5732.65 TRUCK PARTS 124246 CCUNTY LFCLESALE ELECTRIC 5328.29 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 124247 VERNE CCX CC• REAL ESTATE APFR S79500.00 APPRAISAL SERVICES DIST 6 124248 CHARLES F CRCWLEY CC $176.59 PUMP PARTS 124249 CROWN FENCE CO 1855.00 FENCING 124250 CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW MAINT. $29250.00 WINDOW CLEANING 1242F1 ORE INC 1555.07 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 124252 DAMES S MCCRE S249526.53 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-3 1242'E3 DANIEL$ TIRE SERVICE $1.332.58 TIRES 124254 PICHAEL K CASKALAKIS $69697*50 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 124255 DE GUELLE S SONS GLASS CO 569.08 GLASS 124256 DELL COMPUTER CORP 5287.80 COMPUTER REPAIRS 1242`7 DEZURIK AND/CR CS CO $13017.07 VALVE PARTS 1242E8 DTATEC ENVIRONMEN7AL 519936.97 CHEMICALS 1242°9 CICKSCNS S859984 APPLIANCE 124260 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP $673.46 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 124261 DUNN EDWARDS CORP $69012.11 PAINT SUPPLIES 124262 DURO•SENSE CORP $749.57 MECHANICAL PARTS 124263 E.C.S. $252.00 PUBLICATION 124264 EIL INSTRUMENTS INC 575.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124265 EASTMAN INC $69534.04 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124266 ECOANALYSIS INC 1961.76 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91 124267 ELECTRIC EEL MANUFACTURING C 5182.48 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 124268 ENCHANTER INC $59040000 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91 1242ES ENVIPCNETICS• INC $29396.40 LAB SUPPLIES 124270 EIT 599701.36 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124271 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC 5646.50 LAB SERVICES 124272 EUROTHERM RECCROERS INC 5339.48 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124273 FST SAAC ANC GRAVEL INC 1326.37 ROAD BASE 124274 MARSfALL FAIRRES 578.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 124275 FALCCA CISPCSAL SERVICE $9*080.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 124276 JCHN 8 FALKENSTEIN PE S39400000 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16 124277 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP $267.25 AIR FREIGHT 124278 FIRST COMFANY $256.45 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124279 FISCI-ER A PCRTER CO $49177.71 CHLORINATION PARTS 1242FO FISHER SCIEK7IFIC CC 5371.74 LAB SUPPLIES 124281 FISCNS INSTRUMENTS $109635.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 124282 FLO-SYSTEMS 5336.58 PUMP PARTS 124283 FCLSOM LAKE FORD S169987.44 TRUCK 124284 FCPEOCRCS CCMFANY 5228.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 Z COUNTY SANITATICA DISTRICTS OF CRANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID G8/26/92 POSTING DATE C8/26/92 WARRANT No. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124285 FCUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $10.33 FILM 124286 FCLNTATN GALLEY PAINT $19796.57 PAINT SUPPLIES 124287 FCX INDUSTRIAL SALES $29261.59 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124288 FREEDOM IMAGING $123.76 SERVICE AGREEMENT 124289 BUD FREY 521.15 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1242SO CITY OF FULLERTCN S96.91 WATER USE 124291 GPC TRUCK 9 EUS CROUP $139215.54 TRUCK D 12425.2 GANAFL LLPBER CC $10113.4P BUILDING MATERIALS m 124293 GARRATT-CALLAFAN COPFANY $387.90 CHEMICALS m 124294 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $19600.00 FIBERGLASS PIPE Z 124295 GENERAL TELEPHCNE CC S59980.38 TELEPHONE SERVICES d 124256 GIFRLICF-PITCHELL INC $29443.77 MECHANICAL PARTS 124297 GLCEAL CCFPUTER SUPPLIES S358.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES �-+ 124298 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS S95.90 CAMERA rn124299 DCN GREEN & ASSOCIATES S189959.00 SURVEY SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 3 124300 HACH CCPFANY S881.45 LAB SUPPLIES 1243C1 FRED A FARFER S19500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION :;k 1243C2 HARRINGTCN INCUSTRIAL FLAS71 S331.78 FITTINGS 00 124303 HATCH & KIRK INC $442.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 124304 FL hAWN CO INC S154.19 FILTERS 1 124305 HILTI INC $2004.75 ELECTRIC PARTS 3- 1243CE HI STANCAFC ALTCPCM E 5370.2E TRUCK REPAIRS r 124307 HCEFEP SCIENTIFIC INSTR. $19262.58 LAB SUPPLIES r 124308 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC 329107.70 COMPRESSOR PARTS d 124309 HOKE CONTROLS DIY/HOKE• INC. S362.21 VALVE �-+ 124310 J.T. HORVATH d ASSOC. $29100.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17 124311 PS HLGFEE CC INC $19124.31 PAINT SUPPLIES 124312 HUNTINGTCN BEACF RUBBER STA S74.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES a-r 124313 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN C S129.10 BICYCLE PARTS C7 124314 IMO INDUSTRIES $19692.21 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ---j 124315 IRD PECHANALYSIS S255.08 INSTRUMENT C/") 124316 THE ICED EANN $144.80 PUBLICATION 124317 IPFERIAL %EST CHEMICAL S139004.18 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-14-90 124318 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $19201.57 CONNECTORS 124319 INSIDE E.P.A. S137.25 PUBLICATION 124320 INTEPMOLNTAIN SCIENTIFIC CCRP S70.51 LAB SUPPLIES 124321 INSTPUMENI SPECIALISTS S39660@00 INSTRUMENT RENTAL 124322 INTEGRATE[ BUSINESS INT• INC S959114.88 LAB FURNITURE M.0.4-8-92 124323 PACTEL TELETRAC S25.00 TELEPHONE SERVICES 124324 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS S243.41 BATTERIES 124325 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $4.90 WATER USE 124326 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP $779.49 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124327 JIPIS SUSFENSICN SERVICE S30.00 VEHICLE REPAIRS 124328 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $748.71 ELECTRIC PARTS 124329 JONES CHEMICALS INC $6*274.74 CHEMICALS 1243!0 JCNEF INELSTPIAL HARDWARE C S169.28 TOOL tz I W bd FUN(..,j 9199 - JT DIST 4CRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 88/26/92 POSTING DATE 08/26/92 rn 3 4t 00 WARRANT NC. VEhOCR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124331 KARS• ADVANCED MATERIALS INC $49995000 LAB SERVICES 124332 KING BEARING INC $49803014 MACHINE SUPPLIES 1243!3 KNCX INCLSTRIAL SUFPLIES $19423.74 TOOLS 124334 LAW OFFICES CF RCEER7 L LAVOIE S144.01 LEGAL SERVICES - FLORES V. DALEY 124335 LEARN KEY $54.95 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 124336 LEWCO ELECTRIC CO S302.92 TRUCK REPAIRS 124337 LIFECCM-SIFE7Y SERVICE SUFPL $107.75 SAFETY SUPPLIES 124338 SCCC-LYhCF CCRP S702.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124339 MPS S203.32 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 124340 MACOMCD $316.07 SERVICE AGREEMENT 124341 NAG SYSTEPS $559.02 INSTRUMENT 124342 MAINTENANCE PROCUCTS INC S396.52 MECHANICAL PARTS 124343 PANCIC PC7CRE $52.50 TOWING SERVICES 124344 MARVAC ELECTRCNICS $47.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124345 MATT CHLOR INC S338.88 CHLORINATION PARTS 124346 DON PAUPER S29640.00 OCEAN MONITORING 124347 MCBAIII INSTRUMENTS S2s259.77 INSTRUMENTS 124342 PEASLPEPEr7 VARIABLES $985.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124349 PERICIAN CIAGNCSTICS INC S273.Q0 LAB SUPPLIES 124350 MES COMPANY $189826.43 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 124351 MIDWAY PFG 6 MACHINING $9,890.37 MECHANICAL PARTS 1243!2 PINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CC S49291.17 SAFETY SUPPLIES 124.4F2 PINNES07A �ESTERh VISUAL FRES. S437.94 VIDEO SUPPLIES 124354 P.ISSICN AERASIVE SUPPLIES $260.21 HARDWARE 124355 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO $19254.00 ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT 124356 MLAOEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION S1719252.00 CONSTRUCTION 2-30 124357 NATICKAL SAFETY COLNCIL $191018 SAFETY FILM RENTAL 1243°8 NATIChAL SANITAPY SLPPLY $109.04 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124359 NEW ERUN56ICK SCIENTIFIC S49949.60 LAB SUPPLIES 124360 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $13.03 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124361 NCRTHWESTERN CARBON S89449060 CHEMICALS 1243E2 NOVELL $425.62 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1243E3 DX SYSTEPS CC $519105.82 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91 124364 OLYPFUS CCRP $239795.00 INSTRUMENT 124365 ORACLE CORPORATION $550000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 124366 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO S39979.02 HYDROCHLORIC ACID 1243E7 CRANCE VALVE R FI7TING CC. $19458.78 FITTINGS 1243EB CXYGEN SERVICE $29438.56 SPECIALTY GASES 124369 CSOOC SELF-FUNUED MEDICAL I S1J09000.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE 124370 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 3831929 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 1243TI PC SYSTEMS DESIGN S909618.57 COMPUTER HARDWARE M.0.6-10-92 124372 PACIFIC FARTS $29589.73 COMPRESSOR PARTS 124313 PACIFIC SAFE7Y EGUIFPEN7 CC $792944 SAFETY SUPPLIES 124374 PACIFIC EELL $274.38 TELEPHONE SERVICES 124375 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C $68.40 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 124376 PAK LEST $130097 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES bd i FUND NC 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAIL 08/26/92 POSTING DATE 08/26/92 WARRANT NC. VENOCR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124377 PALMIER], TYLER9 HIENER9 $3#373.00 LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELLS 124378 FARTS LNLIMI7ED S19296.00 TRUCK PARTS 124379 RCY FENCERGRAFT $460.10 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1243E0 FICK►ICK FAPER S350.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124381 PIPA GRC SYSTEMS INC S1179483.28 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 124382 PIONEER BANK $169062.40 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-34-3 124363 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES S149.34 PLASTIC BOTTLES 124384 PCLYPUP.E INC $219046.00 CHEMICALS G7 124385 PCRETICS CCRP S607.96 LAB SUPPLIES � 124386 PCWER ELECTRC SUPPLY CO $783.62 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES t=7 124387 PREMIUM CONNECTING POINT S231.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES n 124388 PREMIER PRINTING CORP. $431.00 PRINTING 1243P9 HAROLC PRIMRCSF ICE S308.00 ICE --� 124390 ThE FACQECT SCLUTIONS CC. $49968.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 m 124351 FRC-TECV LAB $59250.00 PUMP PARTS 3 124392 RMB ENGINEERING/MILLTRONICS S624.95 INSTRUMENT 124393 STEVE P. RADOS• INC. S4619686.50 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-lA-2 qk O0 124394 RATNECW CISPCSAL CC S19430609 TRASH REMOVAL 124395 RECYC INC $59*896.57 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91 1 124396 REDI EXPRESS $40.95 MESSENGER SERVICES 124397 RA REED ELECTRIC $19282.97 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS D r 124358 THE REGISTER $805.35 NOTICES & ADS r 124359 MCJUNKIN-PEPUELIC SUFPLY $79059.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1244CO RCSEPCUNT ANALYTICAL S846.78 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124461 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC S29U35.67 INSTRUMENT PARTS Cn 124402 PEGGY RUPP S540.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 124403 RYAN-HERCC S139589.60 PUMPS 124404 SAFETY-KLEEN CCRP S29928.54 PARTS CLEANER n 1244C5 SAND DCLLAR BLSINESS FCRPS $728.06 PRINTING 124406 SANTA ANA ELECTP.IC MOTORS S265.46 ELECTRIC PARTS C/7 124407 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS S49993.54 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 124408 SCHERING-FLOUGH $48.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 124409 SCNWING AMERICA $19257.29 ELECTRIC PARTS 124410 SCIENCE lFPLICATIOKS INTOL S289063.64 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-12-91 124411 SEA COAST DESIGNS S1,348.24 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 124412 SHIMPO AMERICA CORP S95.39 METER 124413 SHURELUCK SALES S11*075.75 HARDWARE 124414 SIGMA CHEMICAL 'CO $37.64 LAB SUPPLIES 124415 SILVERI 8 LE BCUEF $1449561.60 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3 124416 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI S1011.50 PRE -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 124417 SPITH-EPERY CC S794.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 124418 SCCTV COAST WATER S95.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 124419 SCUThERN CALIF EDISON CC S2159652.14 POWER 124420 SO CAL GAS CO $99322.29 NATURAL GAS 124421 SCUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO $189404.67 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 124422 SCUVENIR FFOTC S91.87 FILM PROCESSING Vl Z to i FUND NC 9199 - JT GIST WCRKINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 FAGE 6 ` REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/26/92 POSTING DATE 08/26/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124423 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER S29615.62 COOLER RENTALS/DRINKING WATER 124424 WESTALLCY INC $19917.88 WELDING SUPPLIES 124425 SPECIALIZED FROCLC7S CC S487.31 ELECTRIC PARTS 124426 SPEX INDUSTRIES INC $19474.37 LAB SUPPLIES 124427 SRECO FLEXIBLE $130.28 TRUCK PARTS 124428 SUPELCO INC $19173.54 LAB SUPPLIES D 124429 SLFER ChEM CCRF $379.87 CHEMICALS m 124430 TAYLCP-EUNN MFG COMPANY $879281.24 ELECTRIC CART PARTS ITT 124431 OR GEORGE TCHOBANOGLOUS S972.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES z 124432 TEKOPAULICS $219056@51 MECHANICAL PARTS d n 124433 37 EOUIPPEN7 CCMPANY S235.05 FITTINGS 1244.4 TCNY'S L(CK S SAFE SERVICE S495.48 SECURITY SERVICES 124435 TRAVEL TRAVEL $724.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 124436 TRUCK d AUTC SUPPLY INC $819.75 TRUCK PARTS 3 124437 JG TUCKER 9 SCR INC $29918.95 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124438 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC S838.00 LAB SUPPLIES t"t 124439 UNOCAL $76.00 UNLEADED GASOLINE Cb 1244gO UNITEC CCNCRETE COMPANIES $945.54 CONCRETE 124441 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE S340.64 PARCEL SERVICES 124442 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP $238.50 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT y 124443 VWR SCIENTIFIC S39086.75 LAB SUPPLIES 1-- 124444 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO S19747.92 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 124445 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL $19410.59 ENGINE PARTS d 124446 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $587.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES �-+ 224447 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS S49517.42 LAB SUPPLIES C) 124448 VERTEX, SISTEMS S812.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 124449 VTLLACE NLRSERIES $864.38 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 124450 WATER ENVIRCNMENT FED. $197.45 PUBLICATION 124451 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY S50.924.32 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90 -I 1244F2 WESTINGHCLSE ELECTRIC COPP S319.80 ELECTRIC PARTS Cn 1244F3 GILLCAN ISSCCIAIES S3097.61 ENGINEERING SERVICES 124454 WI TEG SCIENTIFIC S468.72 LAB SUPPLIES 124455 XEROX CORP S29052.46 COPIER LEASES 124456 GECRGE YARDLEY CC $700.83 LAB SUPPLIES 124457 7IEBAPTh AND ALPER S629194.33 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-1 124458 RICHARD E EDGAR ----------------- S200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 08/26/92 ----------------- ----------------- S496389553.95 to I v b G7 m z tj D ►-r m 3 OO I a r r d 00 C7 -I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/26/92 POSTING DATE 08/26/92 SUMMARY #1 CAP FAC FUND #2 OPER FUND #2 CAP FAC FUND #3 OPER FUND #3 CAP FAC FUND #5 OPER FUND #5 CAP FAC FUND #6 OPER FUND #7 OPER FUND #7 CAP FAC FUND #11 OPER FUND #14 CAP FAC FUND #5&6 OPER FUND #7&14 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND CORF SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 3- C AMOUNT $46,763.65 $6,381.83 $171,723.28 $27,292.05 $596.28 $4,635.88 $160,624.00 $26.69 $4,275.75 $10,708.45 $677.18 $430,455.85 $3,838.74 $5,430.74 $826,685.01 $2,679,507.83 $101,023.30 $157,907.44 $4,638,553.95 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA \M✓ August 26, 1992 MEMORANDUM 10844 ELLIS AVENUE P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 To: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager From: Katherine Yarosh, Senior Buyer Re: Purd)ase of Iuiicrocornputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals, Specification No. E 219 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, August 25, 199Z for the Purchase of Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals. Tabulation of bids is as follows: Vendor Rice Golden Star Technology, Inc., Cerritos $ 55,853.00 PC Systems Design, Costa Mesa $ 56,448.00 MicroAge Computer, Fountain Valley $ 56,863.00 Super Computer Center, Fountain Valley $ 59.381.46 MicroAge Computer, Cerritos $ 61,317.00 Connecting Point Computer Center, Mission Viejo $ 61,871.00 KIS Computer Center, Irvine $ 62,081.96 CompuCom Systems, Laguna Hills $ 62,442.64 Overbyte Computers Corp., Carson $ 62,643.00 JIT Computer Source, Inc., Carlsbad $ 64,576.00 Micro Systems Technology, Inc., Mission Viejo $ 68,520.18 The above cost figures represent seventeen (17) different items of various quantities. Bid proposals were received from two other vendors, who submitted 'no -bid' responses. Analyzing all bids, staff recommends award to Golden Star Technology, Inc. (GST) Cerritos, the lowest responsible bidder for all items, for a total cost of $55,853.00, plus sales tax. Respectfully submitted, Katherine Yarosh Seni E1 7 r1� Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager We hereby concur with the foregoing recommendations: Steve Hovey, JCw G. Stre , Information Services Manager Director of Phahce licit AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS licit COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 8 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9, 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 58,714.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL SUPPORT FOR A. C. UNITS The Contractor was directed to furnish and install two additional 14-inch x 26-inch steel beams, one under Air Conditioner No. 2 and the other under Air Conditioner No. 3. The actual structural steel layout of specified air conditioner units was different than shown on the contract drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR COR 19) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,282.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC (FRP) EXHAUST FANS The Contractor was directed to return Exhaust Fans EF-1, 7, and 8 specified as epoxy coated and to upgrade with (FRP) exhaust fans. The upgrade was recommended to increase longevity of the exhaust fans in this application. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR COR 35R) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,218.00 0 Calendar Days "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER Page 2 of 8 C. 0. NO._ Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Item 3 - DOUBLE STUD WALL AT STAIRS NO. 1 AND 3 The Contractor was directed to provide double studs for radius walls of stairs No. 1 and No. 3 in order to fill five -inch gap between landing and framing. The gap was created by a dimensional error between the Structural and Architectural Drawin s. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b�(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: RFI 159 and 160, JRR COR 36R) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,992.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - ADDITIONAL ASPHALT PAVING The Contractor was directed to remove approximately 446 square feet of damaged asphalt paving and install new asphalt paving immediately adjacent to the utility excavation through the auto shop parking lot. The previously damaged asphalt paving was not shown to be replaced on the Contract Drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR CDR 47) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,469.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL SUPPORTS FOR ELEVATOR The Contractor was directed to furnish and install additional structural supports for the elevator. These were required by the State Elevator Inspector in order to meet code. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR COR 60R)' ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,500.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days 11 . "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 8 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Item 6 - SHEET METAL COVERS FOR A. C. FILTER UNITS The Contractor was directed to provide sheet metal covers for the four air conditioner filter units. The covers are necessary to protect against water leakage through the A.C. platform into the building. The covers were not shown or called out on the Contract Drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR COR 50) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: Item 7 - RESURVEY CURB The Contractor was required to recalculate and to sample drop off turnout. This was due to an error Contract Drawings. This item was negotiated with Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: Item 8 - VARIOUS DRYWALL REVISIONS $ 1,279.00 0 Calendar Days resurvey the curb for the in the curve data on the the Contractor pursuant to (Reference: JRR COR 72) $ 956.00 0 Calendar Days The Contractor was directed to furr walls, columns, and steel posts in Rooms 103, 105, 115, 121, 212, 213, 222, 227, 229, and 231, soffit in Room 115. The Contractor also provided a stainless steel cap for sill and ceramic tile for window jambs of Room 118. The furring of walls and columns is required for casework to line up and to cover vent ducts. The stainless steel cap and ceramic tile is to extend maintenance. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR COR 71R and 77R. FCO 40) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 13,140.00 7 Calendar Days Pq "D-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-3" FM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 8 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Item 9 - MODIFY SITE WORK The Contractor was directed to construct, pursuant to the revised design, the loading dock, concrete ramp, six-foot cross gutter, front entry sidewalk, handicap ramp, and to add handicap ramp, bollard, and wire mesh at rear sidewalk. Also to remove plaster and install 3/4-inch channel screed at two locations on the north face of the building, replaster and refog seal the entire panel. The Contractor was also directed to delete 1,118 linear feet of asphalt paving, 24 linear feet of curb, and 170 square feet of gutter. The revisions are required in order to comply with Federal Registar, Americans with Disabilities Act Title 24, Access to Public Buildings. Deleted items of work to be completed by others. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 41, JRR COR 78R) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,694.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 20 Calendar Days Item 10 - MODIFY GRAVITY CONVEYORS, DISH SINK, AND HOOD The Contractor was directed to revise the gravity conveyers, dish sink and hood in Room 118. This work consisted of notching and rewelding supports, relocating mounting clips, conveyor modifications, and additional engineering to accomplish the new layout. The Contractor was also directed to fabricate and install stainless steel support legs for hood and 316 stainless steel valve handle guide for dish sink. Revisions were necessary in order for the room to function as intended. Weight of hood would not allow anchoring into wall only. 30-inch valve extensions required support. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR COR 92R) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,622.00 14 Calendar Days "D-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER Page 5 of 8 C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Item 11 - ADDITIONAL LAB CHASES The Contractor was directed to furnish and install four extra lab chases to conceal power, telephone, and data conduit to the lab tops from the second floor ceiling.. The Contract Drawings did not show the lab casework being fed from below. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR COR 95) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: Item 12 - ADDITIONAL FRAMING AND FIRE RATED DRYWALL $ 1,548.00 1 Calendar Days The Contractor was directed to provide additional framing and drywall for fire rated wall in soffit area above Rooms 234 and 236. This work was necessary as there was not enough clearance in the soffit to allow for the HVAC ductwork and maintain the one -hour fire rating required for the corridor. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR COR 98) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: Item 13 - VELOCITY STACKS FOR EXHAUST FANS $ 1,074.00 3 Calendar Days The Contractor was directed to furnish and install five additional velocity stacks for Exhaust Fans EF-3, 5, 6, 8, and 13. The stacks were not installed due to a conflict in the Contract Drawings. The HVAC system could not be balanced without the installation of these stacks. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR CDR 99) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,617.00 7 Calendar Days "D=5" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 8 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO._ Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Item 14 - UPGRADE EXHAUST FAN The Contractor was directed to provide an upgraded exhaust fan for EF-9. The system requires a specialized unit be made to exhaust combustible fumes. The specified fan is no longer available, so the cost involved with this item is for the next available upgrade. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR COR 101R) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,905.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 15 - MODIFY EXHAUST AIR SYSTEMS The Contractor was directed to add OBD damper, louver, galvanized duct, and eyebrow to Exhaust Fans EF-3, EF-4, and EF-5 on the upstream side of the filters. This was recommended by the consultant as the most economical means to achieve the static pressures in the systems due to the changes in exhaust air conditions for Plan Change No. 10. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO No. 51) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 11� $ 7,418.00 20 Calendar Days $ 58,714.00 72 Calendar Days "D-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-6" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 7 of 8 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE _ September 9. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 72 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidential consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. W" SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date March 1, 1990 Original Contract Time 420 Calendar Days Original Completion Date April 24, 1991 Time Extension this C.O. 72 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 386 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 806 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date May 14, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 7,090,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 952,925.55 This Change (Add) (Ded--ct) $ 58,714.00 Amended Contract Price $ 8,101,639.59 "D-7" AGENDA ITEM #9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-7" i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 8 of 8 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Board Authorization Date: September 9, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: �ngineer Date RECOMMENDED BY: �& P. -�—� CF-ld- Yi C nstruction Manager Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: P/yam Director of Engineering ate General Counsel Date J. R. ROBERTS CORPORATION ACCEPTE BY: Contractor to "D-8" AGENDA ITEM #9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-8" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 46,279.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - CONDUIT AND WIRING FOR EMERGENCY LIGHT FIXTURES This item is for providing conduit, wiring, and junction boxes to provide power for the emergency light fixtures in the Central Power Generation Building. These light fixtures were omitted in the contract documents. Emergency battery packs for type B fixtures are included in this item. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)l of the General Provisions. (Reference: J191-040) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 18,550.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - POWER, CONTROL, SIGNAL RACEWAY, AND CABLE FOR ENGINE CONTROLS This item is for providing conduit, supports, wiring, wire terminations and additional testing required to provide power and controls to the owner -supplied engine controls. The contract documents did not provide the correct number of circuits required to operate the control features provided with the engine controls. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)l of the General Provisions. (Reference: J191-031) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 18,191.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 3 - ELEVATOR SHAFT REVISIONS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE This item is for providing a ladder, receptacle, junction box, light fixture, switch and associated conduit and wiring in the elevator shaft to comply with state elevator code requirements. These items were not provided for in the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)l of the General Provisions. (Reference: J191-043) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,014.00 0 Calendar Days "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" LIM pin COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER Page 2 of 4 C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1 Item 4 - ENGINE STATUS PANEL COMPONENTS AND CABLE This item is for adding push -buttons, indicating lights, and terminal boards to the engine status panel shown on contract drawings 2E27 and 2E44. These changes to the panel are required for compatibility between the owner -supplied equipment and contractor -furnished control panel. These panel components were not required in the contract documents. This item includes credit for deleting control raceway and cable between the status panel and the uninterruptible power supply that is no longer required. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)l of the General Provisions. (Reference: J191-044) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,921.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - GLASS BLOCK MODIFICATIONS This item is for providing lintels and flashing at the second floor level for glass block windows and revising wall openings for glass block at the front door in the Central Power Building. Contract drawings require glass block windows that are thirty-two feet in height which exceeds the allowable unsupported height allowed by the building code. This item includes support angles and weather flashing at the second floor level for three high windows on the north side of the building. This item also includes widening of the wall opening on both sides of the front door to include space for the glass block expansion joints. Contract drawings show a 16-inch opening on both sides of the door. Sixteen and one half inches are required to install the glass block and expansion joints. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)l of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 3,603.00 0 Calendar Days $ 46,279.00 0 Calendar Days "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4 _ P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 21, 1991 Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days Original Completion Date October 12, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 103 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 703 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date January 23, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 15,410,855.00 Prev. Auth. Chan es $ 468,405.00 This Change (Add (Deduct) $ 46,279.00 Amended Contract Price $ 15,925,539.00i "E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE "aw, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1 Board Authorization Date: September 9, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: 4a - It:= 84-17- Engineer Date APPROVED BY: v Director of Engineering Date HUNTER CORPORATION ACCEPTED BY: '111.�0!, sm.42 Contractor Date RECOMMENDED BY: Construction Manager Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gene 1 Counsel Date "E-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE September 9. 1992 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Daduct) $ 15,957.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the fo 11lowing additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. P1-34-3 Item 1 - LPDG PIPING MODIFICATION The Contractor was directed to reroute the low pressure digester gas piping (LPDG) on the east wall of Control Building 11-14 when conflicts were discovered. The 20-inch ductile iron piping, as shown on the contract drawings, interferes with an HVAC exhaust fan at the same elevation. The most cost effective solution was to reroute the piping over the exhaust fan. The work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO-052) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,105.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - GAS PIPE SUPPORT CHANGE The pipe support detail shown on the contract drawings for the LPDG piping on the roof of the Control Buildings indicates a flush mounted pipe. The piping, however, must be supported in order to clear the 12-inch parapet curb and also to maintain a slope down to the drip traps. Since the parapet was incorporated in the roofing membrane system, it was decided to direct the Contractor to change the specified support detail to a concrete saddle type with a galvanized retainer strap in order to support the piping at the correct elevation and provide seismic restraint. The work was negotiated with the Contractor ursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO-53� ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 9,852.00 0 Calendar Days $ 15,957.00 0 Calendar Days "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" 11-1� \111� 1..d COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE September 9, 1992 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF MILESTONE TIME Job No. P1-35-2 Original Contract Date January 28, 1991 Original Milestone Time 365 Calendar Days Original Milestone Completion Date January 27, 1992 Milestone Modification This Change Order 0 Calendar Days Total Milestone Modification 28 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Time 393 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Date February 24, 1992 Job No. J-21 Original Contract Date January 28, 1991 Original Milestone Time 180 Calendar Days Original Milestone Completion Date July 26, 1991 Milestone Modification This Change Order 0 Calendar Days Total Milestone Modification 25 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Time 205 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Date August 20, 1991 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Job No. P1-34-3 Original Contract Date January 28, 1991 Original Contract Time 900 Calendar Days Original Completion Date July 15, 1993 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 27 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 927 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date August 11, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE September 9. 1992 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: Original Contract Price $ 27,205,378.00 Prev. Auth. Chan es $ 616,358.54 This Change (Add (Deduct) $ 15,957.00 Amended Contract Price $ 27,837,693.54 Board Authorization Date: September 9, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: Engineer D to APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: kr- Z—.f,-, rL nstruction Manager Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: ka r �` Wes/ f// 9; a_zmp�F 2/All Director of Engineering ate General Cou sel Dat ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, DIVISION OF ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC. ACCEPTED BY: vj�j' Contractor Date "F-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper DATE September 9. 1992 Construction Co. JOB: Electrification of Puma Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 17,689.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - DISCONNECT AND RECONNECT MOTOR \"J The Contractor removed the existing No. 2 engine and replaced it with an elec- tric motor that drives a pump in the Plant Water Pump Station pursuant to the contract. After assembly was complete, a problem was noted within the pump causing the pump to be removed, rebuilt, and replaced by the Districts mainte- nance forces. The Contractor was directed to disconnect and reconnect the elec- tric motor previously installed on a time and material basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)(B). (Reference: PCH No. 024) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,840.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - FILTER CONTROL POWER After installation was complete, it was later determined that the Ocean Outfall Booster Station Harmonic Filter Control Power from Panel "AL" should be connected to Panel "BL" for Pumps Nos. 3, 4, and 5. In case of a power failure on Panel "AL", the facility would lose all filter control to all pumps. Therefore, the Contractor was instructed to disconnect and reconnect the control power on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)(B). (Reference: PCH No. 026). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 411.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "G'-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper DATE September 9. 1992 Construction Co. JOB: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-1 Item 3 - PRESSURE SWITCHES Problems were experienced with the pressure switches that regulate the flow for the seal water of the ten new pumps installed in Headworks B and C. The pressure switches initially specified did not work properly due to the dirty plant water. The Contractor was instructed to replace the ten switches with a better design that was more suitable to the dirty water conditions at a firm price in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)(A). (Reference: John Carollo Engineers' letter dated April 15, 1992 and PCH No. 027) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,875.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - LUBRICATING OIL CONTROLLERS The contract drawings did not provide lubricating oil controllers for the shafts of the three new electric motors installed at the Primary Effluent Pumping Station. The Contractor was instructed to install the Districts -furnished relays and the necessary conduit and wiring on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)(B). (Reference: PCH No. 030) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,422.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - REMOVE CONCRETE PADS The contract drawings did not provide for the concrete pads that supported the two engines, in the Primary Effluent Pumping Station. Thes operating floor presented an obstruction to th new electric motors that replaced the engines. provide labor and equipment on a force account Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)(B). (Reference: ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: removal of the existing reinforced lube oil, and heat recovery units e concrete pads sticking above the e operation and maintenance of the The Contractor was instructed to basis in accordance with General PCH No. 031) $ 8,252.00 0 Calendar Days "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper DATE September 9. 1992 Construction Co. JOB: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-1 Item 6 - MODIFY LIGHTING FIXTURES The contract drawings specified 21 120 volt lighting fixtures for Headworks C when in fact there is 480 volt power existing. The Contractor had already purchased and received the lighting fixtures when the error was discovered. The Contractor returned the lighting fixtures ballast housings to the manufacturer but was assessed a handling and restocking fee. Work was performed on a force account in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)(B). (Reference: PCH No. 032) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 889.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days �J TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 17,689.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Completion Date Time Extension this C.O. Total Contract Time Extension Revised Contract Time Revised Final Completion Due Date Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Actual Final Completion Date AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - March 12, 1991 480 Calendar Days July 3, 1992 0 Calendar Days 0 Calendar Days Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable ALL DISTRICTS "G-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper DATE September 9, 1992 Construction Co. JOB: Electrification of Puma Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1 Original Contract Price $ 9,369,000.00 Prev. Auth. Chan es $ 98,721.00 This Change (Add (Deduct) $ 17,689.00 Amended Contract Price $ 9,485,410.00 Board Authorization Date: September 9, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: PO Z. ngineer Date APPROVED BY• irector of gineering Date ZIEBARTH & ALPER AND C. S. ALPER CONSTRUCTION CO. ACCEPTED BY: /a- 9;2- tractor Date RECOMMENDED BY: P ` � -13- iL C struction Manager Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gerferif Counsel Date "G-4 AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-4" RESOLUTION NO. 92-126 AWARDING JOB NO. J-28 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT PUMP STATION TELEMETRY AND MONITORING SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-28 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which is a portion of the previously -approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, the Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering these projects was approved by the Boards of Directors on July 19, 1989; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Domar Electric, Inc., for Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28, be awarded to Domar Electric, Inc., in the total amount of $374,100.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, fir` "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(g)(5) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-l" Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 9, 1992. "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(g)(5) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA \...✓ August 4, 1992 11:00 a.m. 4 ADDENDA BID TABULATION SHEET JOB NO. J-28 10844 ELLI5 AVENUE P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 PROJECT TITLE Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System PROJECT DESCRIPTION Replacement of Existing Pump Station Telemetry with Computerized Monitoring Systems ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 400,000.00 BUDGET AMOUNT $ 702,000.00 ------ CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Domar Electric Inc., Lake Elsinore, CA $374,100.00 2. Canus Corporation, Laguna Hills, CA $416,289.79* 3. Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc., El Segundo, CA $583,588.00 4. HSQ Technology, South San Francisco, CA $607,500.00 5. ATSI, Escondido, CA No Bid *Addition error --corrected total. I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Domar Electric in the bid amount of $374,100.00 as the lowest and best bid. n Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering "H-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(g)(5) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3" RESOLUTION NO. 92-127 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR PREPARATION OF WASTEWATER QUALITY, DIVERSION AND TREATMENT STUDY A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR PREPARATION OF WASTEWATER QUALITY, DIVERSION AND TREATMENT STUDY, PROVIDING FOR A REALLOCATION OF THE COSTS AMONG CATEGORIES WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of Wastewater Quality, Diversion and Treatment Study; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to provide for reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the total maximum authorized compensation. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated September 9, 1992, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated July 17, 1991, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of Wastewater Quality, Diversion and Treatment Study, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement with no change in the total maximum authorized compensation (not to exceed $88,.055.00), is hereby approved "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for � itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 9, 1992. 'law/ 11I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2" RESOLUTION NO. 92-128-2 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH RICHARD JOSEPH BATTAGLIA, . 2-9-R1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH RICHARD JOSEPH BATTAGLIA, TRUSTEE OF THE RICHARD BATTAGLIA TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 27, 1986, PROVIDING FOR GRANTING OF NEW EASEMENTS TO DISTRICT AND QUITCLAIMING OF OLD EASEMENT BY DISTRICT, NECESSARY FOR REHABILITATION OF CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-9-R1 ******************* The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section.1. That the certain Agreement dated September 9, 1992, by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County and Richard Joseph Battaglia, Trustee of the Richard Joseph Battaglia Trust dated February 27, 1986, relative to District's receipt of new easements required in connection with relocation of a portion of Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, in exchange for a quitclaim deed quitclaiming the District's old easement granted prior to construction to said Trust, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the certain Corporation Quitclaim Deed dated , wherein County Sanitation District No. 2 quitclaims to Richard Joseph Battaglia, Trustee of the Richard Joseph Battaglia Trust the District's prior access easement, is hereby approved and authorized; and, Section 3. That the real property to be quitclaimed is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 2 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement and Corporation Quitclaim Deed in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 9, 1992. "J" AGENDA ITEM #9(i) - DISTRICT 2 PETITION FOR ANNEXATION Date: July 29, 1992 TO: Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 14 P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 I (We), the undersigned landowner(s), do hereby request that proceedings be taken to annex 54.52 acres (Gross - to nearest hundredth) of territory to the District located in the vicinity of north of San Joaquin Hills Road and west of Newport Coast Drive r (Indicate adjacent street intersection or area description) in the city of unincorporated territory , more particularly (Indicate city or unincorporated territory) described and shown on the LEGAL DESCRIPTION and MAP enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District's annexation procedures. The street address of the property is: none The reason for the proposed annexation is: to provide sewer service Said property is Inhabited / XX Uninhabited. Number of registered voters, if any: • 0 The assessed value of the property is: $ 2,217,182.00 Also enclosed are the JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL QUESTIONNAIRE required by the �.,.� Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report, if appropriate) and a check in the amount of $500.00 representing payment of the DISTRICT PROCESSING FEE. Notices and ccaTmmications relative to this proposal for annexation should be sent to the following: Tom Dawes Paul D. Jones II C.S.D.O.C. The Irvine Company 10844 Ellis Avenue 550 Newport Center Drive Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8904 Tele:(714) 962-2411 ext. 5000 Tele:(714) 720-2449 SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF IANDOWNER '-TWF IAVJvP- 6MP y 550 Newport Center Drive 407�1 2- Newport Beach, CA 92658-2449 - MICHAU C. ELLIS co YICE }PRE IDEMr D b MES R. GAvANAU H `.5t1ZT r4, 99CWTA" 550 Newport Center Drive TPPp'po� Newport Beach, CA 92658-2449 11V AGENDA IT (j) - DISTRICT 14 „V RESOLUTION NO. 92-129-14 AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND FILING -OF APPLICATION TO LAFCO RE ANNEXATION / OF TERRITORY TO DISTRI T N0. 14 ANNEXATION NO. 1 - SAN JOAQUIN HILLS ROAD ANNEXATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT OF TERRITORY KNOWN AS ANNEXATION NO. 1 - SAN JOAQUIN HILLS ROAD ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That proceedings are hereby authorized to be initiated by District No. 14, and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County is hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of territory designated as "Annexation No. 1 - San Joaquin Hills Road Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 1411, the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution, according to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth in this resolution in the manner provided by the Cortese -Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985; and, Section 2. That this proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese -Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code; and, Section 3. That this application is for the purpose of annexing approximately 54.52 acres of territory to District No. 14 in the vicinity of San Joaquin Hills Road and Newport Coast Drive in unincorporated County territory, to provide sanitary sewer service to said territory, which said service is not now provided by any public agency, as requested by The Irvine Company, owners of "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(j) - DISTRICT 14 11-1" said property; and, Section 4. That the territory to be annexed is inhabited; and, Section 5. That this proposal is consistent with the adopted sphere of influence of the affected District; and, Section 6. That proposed Annexation No. 1 - San Joaquin Hills Road Annexation to County Sanitation Districts No. 14 shall be subject to the condition that all fees required to be paid to the District must be satisfied prior to completion of the annexation proceedings; and, Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 9, 1992. ` 110/ "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9 0) - DISTRICT 14 "L-2" ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County, California, does hereby FIND: A. That a Comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities entitled "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan - 1989," hereinafter the "Master Plan," which includes detailed financial and engineering reports, has been prepared, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors setting forth and identifying the required future development of District and jointly -owned facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to all properties within the District service area; and, B. That the financial and engineering reports of the Master Plan have been made available to the public and have been subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 66016 and other provisions of law; and, C. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of the sewage collection facilities, wastewater treatment and disposal facilities of the District; the repay principal and interest on debt instruments or to repay federal and state loans issued for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves; and, "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 "M-1" ' D. That the properties upon which the fees established by this Ordinance are levied, discharge wastewater to the District's collection, treatment and disposal facilities. The costs of operating and maintaining said facilities have constantly increased due in part to increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process; and, E. That the need for upgraded and improved treatment of all wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities is required to protect the public health and safety to preserve the environment without damage; and, F. That the new fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 66013 and 66016; and, G. That the change in rate structure will not necessarily result in an expansion of facilities to provide for growth outside the existing service area. The adoption of these rates will not result in any specific project nor result in a direct physical change in the environment; and, `..W/ H. That the District has, on July 19, 1989, adopted a Final Program Environmental Impact Report in accordance with legally required notices and public hearing, related to the Master Plan, including the financial program; and, I. That the proposed increases in the sewer service charges are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each customer and the service and facilities provided to each customer to the District, a portion of which are necessary to replace the loss of ad valorem property taxes which have been diverted from the District to the State General Fund as a result of state legislative action on September 2, 1992; and, "M-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 "M-2" L1 J. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act from further environmental assessment pursuant to the provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: Section 1 of Ordinance No. is hereby amended to read: "Section 1: Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the established system of sanitary sewer service charges required to be paid by property owners for the services and facilities furnished by the District in connection with its sanitation treatment works and sewage collection system. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and - operation of the sewage collection facilities, wastewater treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments or to repay federal and state loans issued for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves." Section 2: Section 2 of Ordinance No. is hereby amended to read: "Section 2: Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge. Commencing October 15, 1992, each parcel of real property located within the District which is improved with structures designed for residential, commercial or industrial use and connected to the District's system, "M-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 "M-3" shall pay a sanitary sewer service charge based on the average volume of wastewater discharged by a class of users in the sum or sums as set forth in Table A of this Ordinance." Section 3: If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or entity is held invalid by order of court, the remainder of the Ordinance or the application of such provision to other persons or entities shall not be affected. Section 4: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective October 16, 1992. Section 5: Ordinance No. _ is hereby repealed. Section 6: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District, as required by law. ON "M-4" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 "M-4" PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of greater than two-thirds of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County, California, at an adjourned regular meeting held September 16, 1992. Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California ATTEST: l l Assistant Secretary of the Board of Director, County Sanitation District No. of Orange County, California "M-5" AGENDA ITEM #11(C) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 "M-5" 4-Sep-92 ABLE A 1992-93 USER FEE ADJUSTMENTS* Required to Replace 35% Property Tax Shift Ordered By the Governor and State Legislature Pro -Rate Pro -Rate (7/1-10/15/92) (10/16-6/30/93) Total Old New Current Proposed Revised District Ordinance" Ordinance 1992-93`• 1992-93 1992-93 Sinale Family Residence 1 118 121 $21.88 $62.88 $84.76 2 213 216 17.50 54.58 72.08 3 316 319 17.50 57.04 74.54 5 525 528 21.88 90.27 112.15 6 619 622 18.96 58.03 76.99 7 N/A 729 11.67 43.96 55.63 11 1115 1118 17.50 60.73 78.23 Multi-Familv Residen 1 118 121 $13.13 $37.73 $50.86 /unit 2 213 216 10.50 32.75 43.25 /unit `,/ 3 316 319 10.50 34.22 44.72 /unit 5 525 528 13.13 54.16 67.29 /unit 6 619 622 11.38 34.82 46.20 /unit 7 N/A 729 7.00 26.37 33.37 /unit 11 1115 1118 10.50 36.44 46.94 /unit Commercial/Industrial/Governmental/Other 1 118 121 $15.65 $44.97 $60.62 /1,000 SF 2 213 216 12.51 39.03 51.54 /1,000 SF 3 316 319 12.51 40.78 53.29 /1,000 SF 5 525 528 15.65 64.55 80.20 /1,000 SF 6 619 622 13.56 41.49 55.05 /1,000 SF 7 N/A 729 8.34 31.43 39.77 /1,000 SF 11 1115 1118 12.51 43.42 55.93 /1,000 SF *The final user fee amount established for each District shall not exceed the proposed amounts set forth herein. If during the course of the public hearing additional facts are developed to support the adoption of lesser fees than proposed, such fees may be adopted without further notice and hearing. used on fees established by these ordinances. "M-6Q AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 "M-6" COUNTY SANITATION s%wo, DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 In OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 12, 1992 P�t'TATION 'tan ��tS Sill Sacs 19gA \NEE col/ ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10544 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 69 79 119 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on August 12, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., 1n the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: Dan Griset, Chairman x Robert Richardson 'x-Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tem Gene Beyer Thomas R. Saltarelli x Leslie A. Pontious Roger Stanton x Don R. Roth James A. Wahner x Nate Reade DISTRICT NO. 2: x Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman John M. Gullixson 'x-John Collins, Chairman pro tem George Scott x Fred Barrera Gene Beyer x Buck Catlin Chris Norby a Barry Denes Bob Bell x William D. Mahoney James H. Flora x Robert H. Main Norman Culver x Carrey J. Nelson Glenn Parker a Arthur G. Newton John 0. Tynes x Iry Pickler Fred Hunter x Miguel Pulido Dan Griset Roger Stanton x Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: DISTRICT NO. 5: DISTRICT NO. 6: x Sal A. Sapien, x Burnie Dunlap, x Buck Catlin x John Collins x Norman Culver x James V. Evans x James H. Flora a Don R. Griffin x Frank Laszlo x Pat McGuigan -x-Eva G. Miner x Richard Partin x Iry Pickler x Jim Silva Roger Stanton x Charles Sylvia Chairman Chairman pro tem a Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman x Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tem x Don R. Roth James A. Wahner, Chairman a Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tem x Don R. Roth Harry M. Dotson Carrey J. Nelson Chris Norby George Scott Robert H. Main Margie L. Rice William D. Mahoney Rhonda J. McCune Gwen A. Forsythe Robert Richardson Larry Herman Cecilia L. Age Fred Hunter Earle Robitaille x Don R. Roth Ronald Bates Evelyn Hart John C. Cox, Jr. Roger Stanton x Dick Sherrick Ruthelyn Plummer Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Thomas R. Saltarelli James A. Wahner, Chairman pro tem x Nate Reade x Fred Barrera Gene Beyer x John C. Cox, Jr. Ruthelyn Plummer x Robert Richardson Miguel Pulido x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton a Sally Anne Sheridan Barry Hammond DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman Linda Moulton -Patterson x Jack Kelly, Chairman pro tem Don MacAllister 1 Roger Stanton x Don R. Roth -DISTRICT NO. 13: John M. Gullixson, Chairman x Henry W. Wedaa 7-Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tem Gene Beyer -a-William D. Ehrle Fred Hunter x Glenn Parker Burnie Dunlap x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller x Leslie A. Pontious, Chairman pro tem Charles E. Puckett x Fred Barrera =Gene Beyer x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton a Sally Anne Sheridan Barry Hammond -2- 08/12/92 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Susan Bradford, Corrine Clawson, Mark Esquer, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, Steve Hovey, John Linder, Margie Nellor, Bob Ooten, Mary Simpson, Jack Vincent, Chuck Winsor OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Pervaiz Anwar, Jamel Demir, Mary Lee, Royal S. Radtke, Fred Soronshean, Richard von Langen DISTRICT 6 In the absence of Chairman James A. Appointment of Chairman pro tem Wahner and Chairman pro tem Evelyn Hart, Director Don R. Roth was appointed Chairman pro tem of District No. 6. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpt_ re Board Appointments That the minute excerpt from the Costa Mesa Sanitary District re appointment of alternate Director for the August 12, 1992 meeting only, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: District Active Director Alternate Director 1 James A. Wahner Nate Reade ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman welcomed alternate Presentation of District pins to Directors Nate Reade and Dick Directors Sherrick, who were representing the Costa Mesa Sanitary District at this meeting. He then presented pins bearing the Districts' logo to these Directors. The pins are similar to the service pins given to employees and recognize the Directors for their service on the Board of the Sanitation Districts. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized Recognition of persons who wish to Mr. Royal S. Radtke, President of the be heard on matters of general Corona del Mar Chamber of Commerce, interest who addressed the Boards regarding a District 5 sewer project in Pacific Coast Highway through the community of Corona del Mar. Mr. Radtke complimented the Districts for a fine job and keeping the community together and help the merchants survive during the project. He gave special thanks to Charles Gabbard, Project Inspector, Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering and Director Phil Sansone, Mayor of Newport Beach. Mr. Radtke also commended the Districts for the Memorandum of Understanding that did not allow sewer construction to start in Corona del Mar until Pelican Hill Road, which is now Newport Coast Drive, was in place, which allowed many cars to be diverted from PCH to Newport Coast Drive. -3- 08/12/92 ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported on the Report of the General Manager State budget stalemate still going on in Sacramento. He stated that last month he advised the Directors that the proposal to shift special districts property taxes to the school districts was off the table. Mr. Sylvester noted, however, that it is now back on the table and that the Districts will be affected in some way, between 25% and 100%. He observed that currently there are two proposals on the table that would affect the Districts. The "Super Pot" proposal would put the tax revenue from all special districts in the state in one pot, which totals between $1.6-$1.7 billion. Of that amount, 25% would be appropriated for the schools. The balance would be put into a separate fund and distributed in the same manner as special district augmentation funds are currently distributed in each county. The alternative proposal would take 25-30% off the top of enterprise special districts' tax revenue and appropriate it to the schools. For the Sanitation Districts, 25% of our $35 million in property taxes would be just under $9 million that would be shifted to the schools. The General Manager stated that once the budget is passed, its impact on the Districts will require the Boards to meet immediately to consider alternatives including adjusting the user fees to make up for the shortfall. He stated user fees are collected on the property tax bills, and the Districts provide information to the County Auditor for each parcel that the fee is levied against within the Districts' service area. The deadline date, August 10, had been extended to August 24, so timing is of the essence �..✓ because the Boards will have to act quickly. Following discussion among the Directors regarding the impact of the State's budget proposals on the Districts and alternatives for addressing them, it was determined that the Boards would adjourn this meeting to August 19th, and the Board Secretary could continue adjourning to specific dates until such time as the budget is finally passed and the Directors could then meet to consider appropriate actions. Mr. Sylvester then reported that under the Districts' NPDES permit conditions, the US EPA and Regional Water Quality Control Board require the Districts to submit an annual report of the Districts' activities. He stated that the Executive Summary to the 1991 annual report was recently mailed to the Directors, and he urged the Directors to review it. He also stated additional copies were available upon request. The General Manager then reported that as part of the public outreach program, the Districts participated again this year in the Orange County Fair. One of our exhibits included an interactive computer system where people could take a quiz and, if questions answered correctly, they would receive various prizes. This turned out to be one of the high spots of the fair. He commented that the Districts' participation was successful and that we were able to educate a considerable number of people on our wastewater management program. -4- 08/12/92 DISTRICT 1 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes DISTRICT 2 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes DISTRICT 3 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, be deemed approved, as mailed. There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, be deemed approved, as mailed. There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes DISTRICT 14 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, be deemed approved, as mailed. There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held July 8, 1992, be deemed approved, as mailed. 4 -5- 08/12/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment o "A" and "B" attached hereto below, be, and are hereby, so indicated. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Joint Working Capital Fund Self -Funded Insurance Funds DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. 5 DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICT NO. 13 DISTRICT NO. 14 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT District claims and made a part of these ratified by the respectiv 7/01/92 - $1,114,606.29 - 2,392,924.95 - 176,468.67 - 153,223.35 - 109,781.02 - 5,866.42 - 168,549.26 - 185,160.12 - 417.96 - 52,940.28 - 926.99 -0- - 954,131.81 - 1,124.69 - 2,263.66 5,541.13 5,323,926.60 ALL DISTRICTS Awarding Purchase of Traffic Control Devices, Signholders, Signs and Accessories, Specification No. E-216, to J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc. received and ordered filed; and, f 7/15/92 $ 754,027.41 2,737,571.94 172,757.07 57,420.76 117,282.78 15,739.97 17,123.89 17,612.17 99.65 4,443.81 8,159.00 24.19 9,969.45 1,917.20 -0- 12.08 3,914,161.37 7/29/92 $1,348,618.71 3,566,669.69 135,371.08 162,216.51 93,624.87 45,011.83 152,482.24 735,744.54 2,160.85 80,088.19 2,657.92 104.72 508,170.06 3,505.22 32.49 6,578.48 6,843,037.40 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommendation re' Purchase of Traffic Control Devices, Signholders, Signs and Accessories, Specification No. E-216, be, and is hereby, FURTHER MOVED: That the bid of Pacific Safety and Equipment Company, Inc. be, and is hereby, rejected as incomplete; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order be, and is hereby, awarded to J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc. in the total amount of $43,689.24 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase and Installation of Fiber Optic Network Between New That the Boards of Directors hereby Laboratory and Maintenance adopt Resolution No. 92-104, Operations Control Center, receiving and filing bid tabulation Specification No. M-040, to Sim J. and recommendation and awarding Harris Company contract for Purchase and Installation of Fiber Optic Network Between New Laboratory and Maintenance/Operations Control Center, Specification No. M-040, to Sim J. Harris Company for a total amount not to exceed $59,223.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. 08/12/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, That the Boards of Directors hereby Specification No. P-132, to Diatec adopt Resolution No. 92-105, Environmental receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. P-132, to Diatec Environmental for the price of $.039 per pound, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS In response to a request for an Awarding Purchase of Caustic Soda explanation of why District No. 3 was Solution, Specification No. P-133, the only District required to pay a to Western States Chemical Supply large portion of the caustic soda Corporation solution cost, the General Manager explained numerous complaints had been received along the route of the large trunk sewers within District No. 3 many years ago. The wastewater within these sewers are coming from as far away as La Habra, taking 35 to 40 hours for some of this wastewater to travel down to Plant No. 2, thus resulting in many odor complaints. At that time a consultant was hired to address this problem. The problem was resolved by caustic soda injections in the upper reaches of the District No. 3 trunk sewers. He added that the study also determined that Plant No. 2 received benefits from adding the chemicals upstream, so District No. 3 is given a credit for the benefit that the jointly owned and operated treatment plant receives, thereby actually reducing costs to District No. 3. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-106, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-133, to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation, for the delivered price of $271.88 per dry ton, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions, with estimated costs to be shared as follows: Treatment Trunk Plants Sewers Total Joint Districts $326,256.00 $285,474.00 $611,730.00 District 3 Only --- 285,474.00 285,474.00 $326,256.00 $570,948.00 $897,204.00 Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -7- 08/12/92 ALL DISTRICTS Awarding Laboratory Services contract for Analyses of Sludge, Specification No. S-065, to MacDonald -Stephens Laboratories, Inc. filed; and, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommendation for Laboratory Services Contract for Analyses of Sludge, Specification No. S-065, be, and is hereby, received and ordered FURTHER MOVED: That the bids of TBD Environmental Laboratories, C.L. Technology, Inc. and BC Analytical be, and are hereby, rejected for non-compliance with the specifications; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said laboratory services purchase order contract be, and is hereby awarded to MacDonald -Stephens Laboratories, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $30,750.00, for the period August 13, 1992 to June 30, 1993, with option for four one-year extensions. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. it to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 11 to the plans Job No. J-17 and specifications for Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing an addition of $136,617.81 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for two items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 63 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 3 to Purchase Order That staff be, and is hereby, No. 37965 issued to ur-Lite authorized to issue Change Order Corporation for Purchase of Four No. 3 to Purchase Order No. 37965 Waste Digester Gas Flares, Job issued to Sur-Lite Corporation for No. J-21A Purchase of Four Waste Digester Gas Flares, Job No. J-21A, for a reduction of the total authorized amount from $246,960.00 plus sales tax to $238,737.00 plus sales tax, for deletion of electrical termination work and costs due to delays impacting other construction projects. ALL DISTRICTS Director Collins expressed concern Approving Change Order No. 12 to over the quality of the consulting the plans and specifications for engineer for this project causing Job No. J-19-1 numerous change order items because of design errors or omissions. He questioned the cost differential for those items done by change order versus what it would have been if included originally in the plans and specifications. He felt this was performance that should not be rewarded and should be penalized. He also felt that the next time this firm participated in bidding that these types of mistakes be remembered and taken into account in some fashion. 08/12/92 The Director of Engineering agreed that all of the omissions should have been included in the design contract. He pointed out that it was a very complex job but that that was no excuse. He also agreed that there was a cost differential that was probably higher by change order versus being included in the original bid, but observed that it was very difficult to assess. Mr. Dawes reviewed the difference between what is called design omissions versus error omissions. He pointed out that in his opinion Item 4 was a consultant error, and they will demand the consultant to pay that amount. He also reviewed the other change order items. In response to Directors' questions regarding plan checking by staff, the Director of Engineering explained that his staff does some plan checks, although they are limited in their ability to do so because of staff resources. Staff is working on improving this situation. Currently, the Districts have hired a second consultant to do a plan check on another extremely complicated design to hopefully avoid, or at least minimize, these types of situations. The Directors then requested that the cumulative totals of change orders be highlighted in future agenda reports. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 12 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $51,966.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for four items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Jo No. P1-34-1 Approving Change Order No. 22 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: the plans and specifications for Job No. Pi-34-1 That Change Order No. 22 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net addition of $56,349.33 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper for 14 items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 61 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Change Order No. 23 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P1-34-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 23 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net deduction of $61,818.63 from the contract with Ziebarth & Alper for four items of deleted work or revised contract provisions, be, and is hereby, approved Accepting Job No. P1-34-1 as Moved, seconded and duly carried: complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-107, accepting Gas Handling Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -9- 08/12/92 '..011 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 12 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 12 to the plans Job Nos. P1-34-3, Pi-35-2 and J-21 and specifications for Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21, authorizing an addition of $10,336.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc., for two items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 8 to the Professional Services Agreement That the Selection Committee with Brown and Caldwell Consulting certification of the final negotiated Engineers for design of Central fee relative to Addendum No. 8 to the Power Generation Systems re Job Professional Services Agreement with No. J-19 Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for design of Central Power J-19, providing for additional inspection and hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; Generation Systems, Job No. design services, be, and is and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-108, approving Addendum No. 8 to said agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for said additional services, on an hourly -rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $292,024.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $4,179,112.00 to an amount not to exceed $4,471,136.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Approving Agreement with J. T. Horvath & Associates for specialized construction management and inspection services re various master -planned construction projects master -planned construction projects, filed and approved; and, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee relative to Agreement with J. T. Horvath & Associates for specialized construction management and inspection services re various be, and is hereby, received, ordered FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-109, approving said agreement with J. T. Horvath & Associates for said services, on an as -needed basis, for a two-year period beginning October 11, 1992, with option for a one-year extension, at the following hourly rates: Agreement Period Rate 10/11/92 - 10/10/93 $39.20 10/11/93 - 10/10/94 40.95 10/11/94 - 10/10/95 42.80 Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -10- 08/12/92 ALL DISTRICTS Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Martin Kordick, Sr. for specialized construction inspection services re various master -planned construction projects Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-110, approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Martin Kordick, Sr. for specialized construction inspection services re various master -planned construction projects, providing for extension of said agreement from August 10, 1992 through December 31, 1992 with no increase in the hourly rate. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for design and construction services for Job Nos. P1-41 and P2-48 Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Clarifiers A through Q at Plant No. 2, ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing renewal of membership in the Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency SARFPA fiscal year, be, and is hereby, ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing membership in the Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works SCAPOTW hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Receive, file and approve written report of the Special Joint Works Selection Committee Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for design and construction services required for Rehabilitation of Job No. P1-41, and Rehabilitation of Job No. P2-48. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That renewal of Santa Ana River Agency (SARFPA) authorized. on July 16, 1992, be, and is hereby, ALL DISTRICTS Approving agreement with RJN Computer Services, Inc., for design and installation of Computer -Aided u port System for Maintenance Management, Specification No. S-059 membership in the Flood Protection for the 1992-93 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That membership in the Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works (SCAPOTW) for the 1992-93 fiscal year, be, and is Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the written report of the Special Joint Works Selection Committee's meeting re Computers held received, ordered filed and approved. Management, Specification No. S-059, i applicable taxes. Said resolution, by part of these minutes. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-111, approving agreement with RJN Computer Services, Inc., for design and installation of Computer -Aided Support System for Maintenance n the amount of $548,525.00, including reference hereto, is hereby made a -11- 08/12/92 ALL DISTRICTS Receive, file and approve written reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee 1992, be and are hereby, received, Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee meetings held on July 29, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving an Agreement re: _ Application for Specific Plan of That the Boards of Directors hereby Site Use and Development with the _ adopt Resolution No. 92-112, City of Fountain Valley at approving an Agreement re: Reclamation Plant No. 1 Application for Specific Plan of Site Use and Development with the City of Fountain Valley at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 7 & 11 Confirming fees, procedures and policies concerning annexations of territory to the Districts confirming fees, procedures and to the Districts, and foregoing fiscal year 1992-93: Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following resolutions amending Districts' resolutions policies concerning annexations of territory the automatic annexation fee increase for 1992 - 93 Confirming Acreage Fee Resolution Resolution w Tax w/o Tax Dist. No. No. Exchange Exchange 2 92-113-2 91-113-2 $2,922 $3,908 3 92-114-3 91-114-3 $3,154 $4,139 5 92-115-5 91-115-5 $3,054 $4,084 7 92-116-7 91-116-7 $2,902 $3,883 11 92-117-11 91-117-11 $4,843 $5,830 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Conservation, Recycle That the written report of the and Reuse Committee Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee's meeting on July 28, 1992, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the General Counsel's Comments Prior to Directors of the need for a closed Closed Session session as authorized by Government Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957.6 to review: 1) Recommendation relative to a Worker's Compensation claim pertaining to �✓ an employee. -12- 08/12/92 2) A proposed settlement of litigation entitled, United States Government vs. Montrose Chemical Company, County Sanitation Districts. 3) Proposed initiation of litigation against United Oil Company for damages incurred by the Districts as a result of activities of United Oil Company in one of their facilities. 4) Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the manufacturer and general contractor on Districts' two jobs relating to the co -generation combustion engines. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session at 8:25 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 and 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS At 9:50 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., August 19, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., August 12, 1992. DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Agreement with the Garden Grove Agency for Community That the Boards of Directors hereby Development adopt Resolution No. 92-118, approving Agreement with the Garden Grove Agency for Community Development, electing a tax increment pass -through relative to an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Garden Grove Community Project, in accordance with Districts' policy and pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with Church Engineering, That the Selection Committee Inc. for design and construction certification of the final negotiated support services for Contract fee relative to the Professional No. 2-9-R1 Services Agreement with Church Engineering, Inc. for design and construction support services for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, from Imperial Highway West of Kraemer Boulevard to the Intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road, Contract No. 2-9-R1, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-119-2, approving said agreement with Church Engineering, Inc. for said services, on an hourly -rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $119,524.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -13- 111.� "M. 11.01, DISTRICT 2 Adjournment Directors of County Sanitation August 19, 1992. The Chairman 9:50 p.m., August 12, 1992. DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Directors of County Sanitation August 19, 1992. The Chairman 9:50 p.m., August 12, 1992. DISTRICT 7 Awarding contract for Abandonment of Portion of MacArthur Trunk Sewer within John Wayne Airport, Contract No. 7-1B-1, to Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich -& Sons Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., then declared the meeting so adjourned at Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of District No. 3 be adjourned then declared the meeting so of MacArthur Trunk Sewer within John Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, Said resolution, by reference hereto, minutes. DISTRICT 7 Actions re Irvine -Newport Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-3E-2 Approving Change Order No. 1 to the tans and specifications for the Board of to 7:30 p.m., adjourned at Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-121-7, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Abandonment of Portion Wayne Airport, Contract No. 7-1B-1, to in the total amount of $62,000.00. is hereby made a part of these Moved, seconded and duly carried: Contract No. 7- E-2 That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Irvine -Newport Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-3E-2, authorizing an addition of $92,407.00 to the contract with Colich & Sons for seven items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 37 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Contract No. 7-3E-2 as Moved, seconded and duly carried: complete That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-122-7, accepting Irvine -Newport Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-3E-2, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications for Contract No. 7-14-1-1 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-123-7, approving plans and specifications for Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. 5E,S 08/12/92 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving_ Reimbursement Agreement with Orange County Flood Control That the Board of Directors hereby District re Contract No. 7-1-2 in adopts Resolution No. 92-124-7, conjunction with OCFCD improvements approving Agreement with the Orange to the Santa Ana -Delhi Channel County Flood Control District, providing for reimbursement of costs to the Flood Control District for Relocation of the District's Gisler -Red Hill Trunk Sewer Siphon under the Santa Ana -Delhi Channel, Contract No. 7-1-2, in conjunction with OCFCD improvements to the Santa Ana -Delhi Channel within the Cities of Tustin, Irvine, Santa Ana, Costa Mesa and unincorporated County territory; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment of a $55,000.00 deposit for District's portion of said work, be, and is hereby, authorized. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., August 19, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., August 12, 1992. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., August 19, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., August 12, 1992. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., August 12, 1992. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving lans and s ec fications for Contract Nos. 5-32 and 5-33 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-120, approving plans and specifications for Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 4 to the plans Contract No. 5-34-3 and specifications for Improvements Phase 3, contract 52 days day, be, to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-34-3, authorizing an addition of $104,000.00 to the with Silveri & LeBouef for a contract -specified bonus payment for early completion of certain work, based on the rate of $2,000 per and is hereby, approved. -15- 08/12/92 DISTRICTS 5, 6 & 14 Actions re Agreement for Purchase of Capacity and Payment of Operational and Maintenance Charges relative to San Joaquin Hills Planned Community Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that last year, Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) approached District No. 5 regarding the San Joaquin Hills Planned Community (SJHPC).presently undergoing development by The Irvine Company. The SJHPC lies partly within District No. 5 and partially within District No. 14 with an island between the boundaries of Districts 5 and 14. This area was originally intended to be a part of District No. 14 but was inadvertently overlooked during the original formation of District 14. The annexation of this area to District No. 14 would be processed separately at a future date. Mr. Dawes further reported that the SJHPC development could best be served locally by IRWD wastewater collection facilities; however, there are no transmission facilities owned by either IRWD or District No. 14 which could deliver flows to IRWD's Michelson Treatment Plant. Delivery to the Districts' Joint Treatment and Disposal Facilities would require use of District Nos. 5 and 6 sewer lines by District No. 14. If the proposed agreement is approved, IRWD's local collector system would deliver flows to the regional collection facilities of District Nos. 5 and 6. He further stated that in order to best accommodate flows from SJHPC, an agreement had been prepared which provides for District 14 to purchase between 4% and 5% capacity in the District 5 and 6 trunk system, and for District Nos. 5, 6 and 14 to share in the operation and maintenance costs of the sewers. The estimated "buy -in" cost is $1,389,129.97. The "buy -in" cost to District 14 for existing facilities is $878,729.97, the payment of which will be divided between District 5 ($855,400.03) and District 6 ($23,340.94), based on their proportionate ownership of existing capacity. The balance of the payment will be similarly divided when the future facilities are completed, at which time District 14 will pay an estimated $518,300.00 to District 5 and $1,100.00 to District 6. The Director of Engineering also reported that within the SJHPC, north of the District 5 boundary, is a portion of the "Downcoast Area" for which IRWD paid connection fees as part of Annexation No. 7 to District No. 5. Included in the proposed agreement is a provision to refund to IRWD funds incorrectly paid to District 5 for connection fees on properties located outside of District No. 5. Connection fees for 509 residential units, which are now planned to be built in SJHPC within District No. 14, were paid to District No. 5 at the capital facilities charge of $1,500.00 per residential unit. Therefore the sum to be refunded by District No. 5 to IRWD is $763,500.00. -16- 08/12/92 Mr. Dawes stated that the agreement provides an economical way to serve this area without IRWD being forced to build costly lines to the Michelson Reclamation Plant, with Districts 5 and 6 having adequate capacity within their lines to support this sale, and staff recommended approval of this agreement. A brief discussion followed in response to a question by Director Sherrick regarding the advisability of District No. 6 selling reserve capacity in its system to accommodate the proposed arrangement. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: dated August 199 That the Staff Report dated August 3, 1992 re proposed Agreement for Purchase of Capacity and Payment of Operational and Maintenance Charges relative to San Joaquin Hills Planned Community, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Approving Agreement for Purchase of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Capacity and Payment of Operational and Maintenance Charges relative to That the Boards of Directors an Joa uin Hills Planned hereby adopt Resolution Community JHPC No. 92-125, approving Agreement for Purchase of Capacity and Maintenance Charges relative to San Joaquin Hills Planned Community (SJHPC) among Districts Nos. 5, 6 and 14 and the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD), providing for the purchase by District No. 14 of capacity in transmission facilities owned by Districts 5 and 6, and providing further for the reimbursement by District No. 5 to IRWD of a prior overpayment of connection charges relative to properties within _ the SJHPC. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., August 19, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:05 p.m., August 12, 1992. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., August 19, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:05 p.m., August 12, 1992. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:05 p.m., August 12, 1992. As istant Se tar f the Boards of Directors f County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -17- m X bd -I 1 (INC 10 9199 - JT DIST WIRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE 07/01/92 WARRANT NC. VENCCP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 122993 ASP ANALYSIS 122994 A 7 i T 122955 AMERICAN TELEPHONE 3 TELEGRAPH 122996 A T S T 122997- ACCU•LABS RESEARCH .INC - 122998 AIR PRODUCTS 9 CHEMICAL 1N 122999 AMERICAN AIR FILTER INC 123000 ROBCO INC S/CR AMERICAN SEALS 123001 AMERICAN SICFA 123OC2 APCRICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLECIN 123003 _ ANAHEIM ..SEWER ..CONSTRUCTION 123004 CHARLES E. ANDERSON 123005 AN7HCNY$S MECH S MACHINE+ INC. 123006 A -PLUS SYSTEMS 123067 ABC LABCRATORIES 123008 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT .123009 - _. .ASSOCIATED. SOILS. ENGINEERING. 121010 ASSOC@ ADFINIS. R CONSULTANTS 123011 ASSCC. ACFIN 9 CONSULT. 123012 ASSOC ACFINIS 9 CONSLLTANTS 123013 ANSA 123014 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO 123015 -. AUTOCCN INDUSTRIES INC: 123016 ALARCS a TPCPNIES 12Z017 BC ANALYTICAL 123018 BRW .SAFETY R SUPQLY 123019 BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE 123020 BAILEY CONTROLS COMPANY 123021 BANANA.BLLEPRINT _ 123022 B BATEFAN 121023 BAI7ERY SFECIAL7IES 123024 _ BAM7ER EIACNCSTICS INC 123025 BAYLESS STATIONERS 123026 ROBERT BEIN WILLIAM FROST 123027 J A H BERGE .INC 123028 WT BILLARC INC 123025 BIC+RAC LAECA47CRIES 123C3V. BID TECH NET• INC .. 123031 DOLTRONIX DATA MAINTENANCE 123032 BRINDERSON CORP 123033. BRCWN 8 CALCWELL CONSULTING 1230!4 BLILCERIS EFFCRILM 123035 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC _. 123036 .. _ GARY G . S7REEO 123037 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY 123038 C 9 S COMFLNICATIONS $960.U0 ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS S29934.56 LONGS DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES----- $19505.68 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES $178037 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 550.00 LAB SERVICES - -- --- - $169815.00 O&M AGREEMENT OSY GEN SYST. M.0.8-9-89 $19439.03 MECHANICAL PARTS $522.70 MECHANICAL PARTS - - - $157.22 METER PARTS S440.25 LAB SUPPLIES S169026.78 EMERGENCY SEWER•REPAIRS DIST-7------•--- S290.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS S571.71 SHAFT REPAIRS $39207.26 NOTICES & ADS --- - --- S235.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT S101.25 INSTRUMENT PARTS S3.100.00 - - SOIL TESTING - •----- -_•. -._ __ 1105.00 MEDICAL CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR S79540.00 EMPLOYEE PRESCRIPTION CARDS S150.00 EMPLOYEE PRESCRIPTION CARDS PRINTING_ S750.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION S29TO1.71 TRUCK PARTS S392.62 - ELECTRIC- PARTS---------- S50.59 AWARD PLAQUES $39720.00 LAB SUPPLIES S39.98 _ SAFETY SUPPLIES..____-. _. S128.OQ BACKFLOW TESTING S138.79 TOLL S1a767.42- __.. BLUEPRINTING M.O.IOT-IO-9O -. $600.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION $19834951 BATTERIES S79036.71 _ _._ _ LAB _SUPPLIES S49.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES $800000 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-34 S297.66 ..- _.LAB. SUPPLIES.._._.-._ $619@70 TRUCK PARTS S629.98 LAB SUPPLIES $156.61 SERVICE AGREEMENT._.... S285.00 COMPUTER DATA DISK MAINTENANCE S419445.49 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 S28 9 225.98 ___ . _ _ _.. ENGINEERING SERVICES 5241.7E HARDWARE/LUMBER S29604.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 $89011@12 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT.__.-__-. S562.78 OFFICE SUPPLIES $92.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES m X to a I fV FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY .. - - ----.-.---•- - CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE 07/01/92 WARRAQT-NO. -__ VENDOR.. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION - 123039 C M T 5488.97 ELECTRIC PARTS 123040 CS CCMPANY 519879.73 VALVE ---. 123041 CALTRCL INC $379.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123042 CALIFCRNIA ALTC CCLLISICN INC S1s321.56 TRUCK REPAIRS 123043 CALIFCRNIA AUTOMATIC GATE 5297.1b SERVICE AGREEMENT 123044 CA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 119323.42 COOPERATIVE BIOASSAY RESEARCH 123045 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 51309992.02 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38, P1-20 123046 CENTLRY SAFETY INST 9 SUPF 5169662.04 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123047 CERTIFIEC LAECRA70RIES $300.00 LUBE OIL 123048 CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS SERVICE 5390.0U SUBSCRIPTION 123049 CHEVRON USA INC $59345.78 OIL -.. - 123050 CITY WIRE CLOTH INC $17.31 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 123051 COLICH AAC SCNS 51*8949053.00 CONSTRUCTION I-9 123052 CCHPLSAs INC. S29162.22 COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE. 1230E3 CCNNELL EP FARTS I DIV $127.58 TRUCK PARTS 123054 CON -WAY ►ESTERN EXFRESS $79.49 FREIGHT 123055 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL, GIST S79581.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1230a6 CCNTAINERIZED CHEMICAL DISPC S190000 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 123057 CCNTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC 539742.09 TOOLS 1230-E CCNTINENTEL. CHEMICAL CC S40848075 CHLORINE M.0.10-19-91 123059 CORE -LABS 519350.00 LAB SUPPLIES 123060 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 5927.54 TRUCK PARTS. 123061 STATE OF CALIFORNIA S18r667.00 SALES TAX PAYMENT.___._ _ 123062 DAILY PILCT 550.00 NOTICES & ADS 123063 CAPES A PCCRE $559003.79 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-3 123064 J.L. C'ANCELC CC INC S29122@68 PIPE 123065 CANIELS TIRE SERVICE $43964 TIRES 123066 DATA STORM $76.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 123067 PETER C DAVID CO $1369387.80 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2_ ... _._---�- 123068 DEZURIK ANOICR CS CO 519940.60 VALVES 123069 OIATEC ENVIRCNPENTAL 529264.26 CHEMICALS M.0.10-9-91 123CIO DIFILIPPC ASSCCIATES $54.95 PRINTING _.._ 123071 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP $561875084 COMPUTER NETWORK SERVICES M.O.1-9-92 123072 SYCON CORP 5146.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123073 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION 58 085.31 CRANE MAINTENANCE_._ _ 123074 OCRAEC ENTERFRISES INC 5169278.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS 12!075 CLNN EC4OFCS CCRP $39816*73 PAINT SUPPLIES 123076, DURO-SENSE CORP 5749.64 . MECHANICAL PARTS...- 123077 DWYER INSTRUMENT INC 5948.55 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123078 DOVALS SALES 5299.13 FITTINGS 123079 EASTPAN INC 15*198.06 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123080 ECCANALYSIS INC $59594.59 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91� 12!OE1 ECIARCS HIGH VACLLP INTER. 51*708.56 LAB SUPPLIES 123082 ELECTRO NUMERICS INC $19548.01 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 123083 ENCHANTER INC 529940.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91 123084 ENSECO-CALLAB $2.680.00 LAB SUPPLIES m X r-� t7d n I W .1 F nI NC .9199 JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL FROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 FAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 - - --- - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE 07/01/92 WARRANT NO. _.. ._ VEACOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION--..- . 123085 EN VIRONMENIAL RESOURCE ASSCC S19089.5G LAB SERVICES -.-.123086 - - EXCELLENCE IN TRAINING S906.00 PUBLICATION - - 123087 MARSHALL FAIRPES S178.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 123088 JCHN 9 FALKENSTEIN PE $39400800 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16 1230E9- -. ... FECEPAL EMPRESS CORP $370.25 AIR FREIGHT 123090 FERRELLCAS S153.09 PROPANE 123091 FILTER SUPPLY CO S514.34 CHLORINATION PARTS 123092 .. FISCHER t PORTER CO S784.38 CHLORINATION PARTS 123093 FISHEP SCIENTIFIC CO S19057.73 LAB SUPPLIES 123094 FISORS IKSTRUPENIS $189388@50 LAB EQUIPMENT 123055 _ FLC-SYSIEPS S333.92 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123096 FCRBES CCMPUTEP GROUP INC $99862.36 COMPUTER SYSTEMS 123097 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA S35.21 FILM - 123098 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY S1o620.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISCLOSURES _ 123099 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT S570.56 PAINT SUPPLIES 123100 FCX ENIEPPRISES S19825.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT 1231C1- FCX.IAOLSIRIAL SALES $103.70 PAINT SUPPLIES 123102 ThE FOXBCRO CO $93.78 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 123103 FREDSON RV SUPPLY $39.80 TRUCK PARTS 123104 BUD FREY S71.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION _.. 123105 GCS SERVICE $163.58 LAB SUPPLIES 123106 GAQAhl LLPBER CO S260.71 HARDWARE/LUMBER 1231C7 GAUGE REPAIR SERVICE $377.04 INSTRUMENT REPAIR .___.---_-.__._. ...._-_.._._.._ 123108 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CC. S948.81 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 123109 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $49338.75 TELEPHONE SERVICES 123110 GENOSYS BIOTECHNOLOGIES $39077.75 LAB SUPPLIES 123111 LIFE TECHhCLOGIF.S/GIBCO/BRL S121952 LAB SUPPLIES 123112 GIERLICH-PITCHELL INC $159348.12 MECHANICAL PARTS 12!113 -GRAPFIC CISIRIEUTCRS S443.93 FILM 123114 DAVID R. GRIFFIN $99000000 LEGAL SERVICES 123115 H8 TYPE 9 GRAPHICS $10.78 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123116.. GECRGE T HALL CO S19698686 MOTORS 123117 FRED A CARPER $19500000 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 12.116 HARRIAGICP INDUSTRIAL FLASII S19086.39 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123119 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $29700.00 TRASH REMOVAL 123120 EG HELLEROS SON INC $33.02 TOOLS 123121 HOERRIGER CVS CALIF INC S394.85 MECHANICAL PARTS 123122 J.T. HORVATH 6 ASSOC. $39000400 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J717. _ 123123 AS HUGFEE CC INC S246.97 PAINT SUPPLIES 1231i4 CITY OF FLAIIPCTCR BEACI, S179233.5G WATER USE 123125 HUATIAGTCK VALLEY SCHWINN C 3172.18 BICYCLE PARTS 123126 ICC INSTRUMENT 146.73 METER 12312T I.G. INDUSTRIAL CORP. $39133.87 CHEMICALS __123128_ _. IMPERIAL .LEST _CHEMICAL S329155.90 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-14-94 123129 IA-CICE TECHNCLOCIES INC S389.12 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123130 INCUSTRIAL ThREADED PRODUCTS S246.96 CONNECTORS m x bd FUND NC 9199 JT DIST YCRKINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6125192 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUhTY SANITATICN DISTRICTS OF CRANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE 07/01/92 WARRANT N0.• VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION _...__. 123131 IRCRAP PAPER $29555.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123122 Ih7ERPOLKI AIN SCIENTIFIC CGRF $79080.12 LAB SUPPLIES 123133 INSTRUMENT SPECIALISTS S79000.00 LAB SUPPLIES 123134 J 6 M SERVICE $117.48 TRUCK PARTS 123135-- J 6 .W SCIENTIFIC... $552@20 LAB SUPPLIES 123136 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP S999.83 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123137 JAY•. CAIERIKC $662.29 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES 123138 JET FCRP CCRP. $518@06 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 123139 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY S868.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 123140 KARLEE COMPANY S339.27 PAINT SUPPLIES 123141 KELLEY .RLLE BOCK S137.92 SUBSCRIPTION 123142 KING BEADING INC $588.45 MACHINE SUPPLIES 123143 KhCX IhCLSM AL. SUFFLTES S19854.99 TOOLS 123144 MARTIN KCRDICK SR $19443975 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 123145 LEEWARD SHELVING 6 FILE SYS. $191090 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123146 LIFECOM•SAFETY SERVICE SUPPL S118614 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123147 LIMITOROUE CORP S29826.46 MECHANICAL REPAIR 123148 KP LINCS1RCM INC S29945.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - NPDES PERMIT 123149 SCCC-LYhCF CCRF 1583.40 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123150 PDT EICLCCIC. CCPPANY 1245.76 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 123151 SUSAN MURCOTT $39242*45 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL 123152 MPS S220.31 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 123153 MACOPCO $728.84 INSTRUMENT 123154 MAINTENANCE PROCUCTS INC 52*353.56 MECHANICAL PARTS 123155 PANTEK $211.10 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123156 MARVAC -ELECTRONICS S67.95 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123157 MATT - CHLOR INC $39176.52 CHLORINATION PARTS 123158 MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS INC S420.04 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123159 MECHANICAL SEAL REPAIR $151.31 PUMP PARTS 123160 PICRCAGE CF CERRITCS $741041 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1231E1 P1C►AY PFf R PACFINING S189824.62 MECHANICAL PARTS 123162 MITChELL INTERNATIONAL INC S116.37 PUBLICATION 123163 MITCHELL PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS S269160.30 CONSTRUCTION 7-11-2 123164 JAMES M MONTGOMERY $49756.21 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.12-12-90 123165 MCNTGCMERY LABORATORIES S159537.00 LAB SERVICES. 123166 P.USTANG UNITS COMPANY $213.00 HARDWARE 123167 hAIICRAL SANITARY SUFFLY $218.09 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123168 NEWARK ELECTRONICS S760.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES. 123169 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH S11.15 WATER USE 123170 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $678086 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY GLASSES 123171 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR P.ES $62.92 OFFICE FURNITURE 123172 DX SYSTEMS CC S179564.37 CHLORINE M.0.10-10-91 121173 OPERATION TLCHNCLOGY INC S850900 TRAINING REGISTRATION 123174 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C S274.36 TRUCK PARTS _..__. 123175 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO S29797.12 CHEMICALS 123176 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CC, S29195.75 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY -.-- - -. -.- CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE 07/01/92 YARRAA7 N0, VEhDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123177 OXYGEN SERVICE S6.119.58 SPECIALTY GASSES 123178 COUNTY OF ORANGE S89502.94 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT .....- 123179 CSCOC SELF -FUNDED MEDICAL I $1009000.00 SELF -FUNDED HEALTH PLAN PREMIUM ADVANCE 1231E0 CCLN7Y SlhITA7ICh CISTRICT S49245.22 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 123181 PACE MEPEERSFIP WAREHOUSE $45.00 MEMBERSHIP FEB 123182 PACIFIC ENERGY RESOURCES S1639000000 OIL WELL ABANDON/CLEAN-UP H.O.10-9-91 123183 PACIFIC PARTS S49343.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123184 PACIFIC SAFETY EOU1PMEh7 CC $65.98 SAFETY SUPPLIES _.... .. 123185 PACIFIC EELL 5668.9E TELEPHONE SERVICES 12ME PACIFIC 1/LK-Ih MEDICAL $980000 MEDICAL EXAMS 123187 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS S89609018 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS_ 123188 PAK WEST $19101015 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123189 PARAGON CABLE S46.78 CABLE SERVICES 123190 PARTS UNLIMITED S1.336.00 TRUCK PARTS _. 123151 RCY FEhCERGRAFT $460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 123192 PERKIK-ELDER CORPORATION $19906.25 LAB SUPPLIES 123193 PERMA . PURE PRODUCTS INC $89328.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123194 PETLAND PAVILION S96.81 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 12!195 PICK►ICK PAPER S67.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123196_ PIPA GRC SYSTEMS INC S1109607.22 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 123197 PICNEER BANK $179471.90 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-34-3 123198 PITNEY BCWES S183.18 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 123199 POLYMETRICS9 INC. $954.50 EQUIPMENT RENTAL. 123200 POLYPURE INC $219170.24 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 123201 PCSITIVE FCRMULA70RS9 INC. S242.30 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 12E2C2 PRECISICK INDLSIRIES S20.81 FITTINGS 123203 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $196000 ICE 123204 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. S49269.OD SOIL TESTING 123205 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 34.720.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTIOR M.Q.7-123206 PRO LAB DIAGNCSTICS S230.94 LAB SUPPLIES 123207 AQUA-CHEFv IhC S19630.71 BOILER PARTS 12!2C8 SIEVE P. FACCS• IhC. $190499287.00 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-14-2 A 1-16 123209 RAINIK INSTRUMENT CO S685.06 LAB SUPPLIES 123210 RECYC INC $429955.89 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.7-13-91 123211 RED LINE ENTERPRISE 5520.00 STREET SWEEPING ___.___-__ _. 123212 REC WING SHCES $331087 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 123213 RECI EUPFESS $97.65 MESSENGER SERVICES 123214 ThE REGISTER S682.50 NOTICE$ & ADS 123215 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $29727.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123216 RESTEK CORP S726.31 LAB SUPPLIES 123217 ROSINSOK FERTILIZER CO S495.87 GROUNDSKEEPING 123218 RCSEPCUhliLKILCC S19575.64 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123219 PEGGY RLPF $540900 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 123220 JOSEPH T RYERSCK B SCN IN SIs891&66 METAT, _.. _....._._._.___ .- 123221 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP $242.25 PARTS CLEANER 123222 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS S39683.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 _.. __..__..._ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE 07/01/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123223 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTOL S2459707.62 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-12-91 123224 -- SCCTT CCFFANY S39065900 TRUCK SCALE REPLACEMENT M.0.5-8-91 .- 123225 SEA COAST DESIGNS s110.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12222E SEAVENILRES S19128@50 OCEAN MONITORING 123227. SERPENTIX CONVEYCR.._CORP 529091.02 MECHANICAL SUPPLIE3 123228 SEWER EOUIP CO OF AMERICA S10S 3.63 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 123229 SHAMROCK SCIENTIFIC SPEC SYS S120.44 LAB SUPPLIES 123230 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $133001 TOOLS 123231 SHASTA ELECTRIC $491.74 ELECTRIC SERVICES 123222 ShURELUCK SALES S59775.92 TOOLS/HARDWARE _. 123233 .... SIGMA .ChEPICAL CO S421.27 LAB SUPPLIES- 123234 SILVERI 6 LE BOUEF $1579247.10 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3 123235 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI S674000 PRE -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EkAMS _.123236 SMITH•EFERY CO S746.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-:17-91 123237 SFITh PIFE E SUPPLY INC $19072.55 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 12!238 SCNNENSCHEIN MATH 6 RCSENIP $455900 LEGAL SERVICES - PERSONNEL 123239- SCUTh COAST WATER S87.50 WATER USE 123240 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO s3769235.46 POWER 123241 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO S89512.91 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL _123242 WESTALLCY INC $19040.41 WELDING SUPPLIES_ 123243 SPECIAL FLASTIC SYSTEPS INC S19093.49 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 12:2A4 SFECIRUP•hLPAN RESCURCE SYS $900000 TRAINING REGISTRATION 123245 SPEX INOLSTRIES INC S719.14 LAB SUPPLIS3 _ _.__ __-.-._ _ 123246 STANCOfS VACUUM SERVCE $19144000 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 123247 STARNA CELLS• INC. S314.77 LAB SUPPLIES _ 123248.- STATEWICE INSTALLERS---. S19989499 _ MOVING SERVICES_ LABORATORY_.EQLISE-_- 123249 S7ERLINE ART S195.01 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123250 STROFBOTNE PRINTING S944.97 PRINTING 123251 - _ ._ SUNSET.... FORD . __ $337.80 _ TRUCK PARTS__-__-___._- 123252 SUPER CHEM CORP S19209.55 CHEMICALS 1232°3 SUPER TECF REFERENCE GUIDE $74.85 PUBLICATION -123254 _. SUPERIOR INTERLOCK CCRP se7.33 _ _ .. HARDWARE 12!2i5 TAYLCR 1NELSIRIAL SCFIWAFE $29387.02 TRAINING REGISTRATION 123256 TEXAS CCMPERCE BANK S10.731.61 C.O.P. ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ___123257 .. __._ THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL -.SUPPLY. S64.68 _ _ MECHANICAL SUPPLIES_... _ 123258 THOMSON TECHNOLOGY♦ INC. $285.42 ELECTRIC PARTS 123259 TONY•S LCCK I SAFE SERVICE $602.07 RE -KEY LOCKS ___123260. _ ...TRAVEL TFAVEL $128000 TRAVEL SERVICE$ N.0.6-12_91 123261 TRUCK S AUTC SUPPLY INC $347.39 TRUCK PARTS 123262 TRUESDAIL LABS S130.00 ASBESTOS TESTING 123263 .._TUSTIN . DODGE $43.41 _ . TRUCK PARTS 123264 TWINING LABORATCRIES CF S99147.00 PIPE INSPECTION 123265 URISA S80.00 SUBSCRIPTION ._1222E6 _ ULIRA .SY11EMS $19862*53 ENGINEERING_SERVIC99 123267 UNION BANK S29906.70 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 7-11-2 123268 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE S600.06 PARCEL SERVICES m X Z bd >7 1 v nD KC 9199 - JT DIST YCRKINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 --•---••- -------- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - --•--•---- -•— —• -- CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE 07/01/92 WARRANT N09 VEADOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 12.12E9 VLR SCIEATIFIC $41903010 LAB SUPPLIES 123270 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $19916.63 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123271 VALUEYARE 1189*10 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 123272 VANIER RUSINESS FORMS S695.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123273 VARIAK AAALYTICAL INSTRUMEATS $39506097 LAB SUPPLIES. 12:274 VARIER ACCLS7ICS9 INC9 $510974 BUILDING MATERIALS 123275 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPFLY S36.03 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123276 CARL .WARREN s CO $314018 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR_..._ 123277 K.H. kATTS CO S363.39 ELECTRIC PARTS 123278 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 1299435944 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90 123279 YESCC - S34014 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 123280 RCURKE 6 ►CODRUFF 9 CR S839512913 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 123281 XEROX CORP $19248*08 COPIER LEASES 123282 GEORGE YARDLEY CO S176.71 VALVES 123283 RAY S YCLNG $59000*00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 123284 RICHARD E ECGAR S200900 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 S593239926.60 SUMMARY #1 OPER FUND #2 CAP FAC FUND #2 OPER FUND #2 CAP FAC FUND #3 OPER FUND - — #3 CAP FAC FUND #5 OPER FUND --#5 CAP PAC FUND..-..-- --- - #6 OPER FUND #7 OPER FUND - #7 CAP FAC FUND — #11 OPER FUND #14 OPER FUND - #5&6 -OPER- FUND- - - #5&6 CAP -PAC FUND #6&7 OPER FUND -- #7&14 OPER FUND ----- JT OPER FUND CORP - -SELF- •FUNDED-- INSURANCE FUNDS JT WORKING CAPITAL AMOUNT $1,512.89 $109,269.13 $5,165.99 $700.43 $20,624.46 $147,934.80 $6,524.55 $178,635.57 $417.96 $19,683.90 $33,256.38 $926.99 $954,131.81 $1,109.71 $14.98 $2,263.66 _ $5,541.13 $1,114,606.29 $2,392,924.95 .$153,223.35 $176,468.67 $5,323,.926.60 .._ _ FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/09/92 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PA1C 07/15/92 POSTING DATE 07/15/92 WARRANT N0. _.. VENDOR AMOUNT _ DESCRIPTION 123311 NAG SYSTEMS $649073 INSTRUMENT PART 123312 AG TECH COMPANY _. $629894@07 RESIDUALS REMOVAL-M.0.10-9-91------ --- 123313 ACX COOPCOA71CK $19884.98 GAUGE 123314 ASTM S5.00 PUBLICATION _423315_ _.._ RP..-ADAMS_. COMPANY .......... _ $10826.70 . - - FLANGE -- - -- --------- -- --- 123316 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC S195739214.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-3, P1-35-2 123317 AIR PROOLCTS 6 CHEMICAL IN S339630.00 O&M AGREEMENT O%Y GEN SYST. M.0.8-9-89 - 123318 _. ALTA -? RCEE1hS _.. -.__ .._. _ .. S493.10 INSTRUMENT .SUPP.LIES-._ .._-- 123319 ALTSCPUL ERCLF CCRP $231.00 PUBLICATION 123320 ACOROIA BENEFIT SERVICES $149000.00 ANNUAL AGGREGATE PREMIUM -123321 1NSTI.TUTE-Dom_..___..__. __ _.. . _ _.. S45.00._. :. _._.__.._-_.._. -PUBLICATION.._--.- 123322 AMERICAN PEDIA INC S393.95 PUBLICATION 123323 RCRCO INC I/CR AMERICAN SEALS S988.28 HARDWARE _ .123324._ .- ..... ___._ AMERICAN . SIGF!A _........ _......_._ $1@508.49 INSTRUMENT PARTS-_.-�__--_-.-.-_-_-_-_ 123325 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $109750.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS DIST 2 123326 SLAKE P ANDERSON S92.08 CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT -123322___-- ..ANTHCSY!S_.rECH.R-AACHINE"NC..-._-__ ...___... __..i42.7.50_--_. _.._._.. -_-___-MECHANICAL_ REPAIRS_-- m 123328 A-PLLS SISTEPS $19907819 NOTICES & ADS X 123329 ARATEX SERVICES INC S69538.76 UNIFORM RENTALS = -_123339--- •._. ___.ARIZONA._ INSTRUMENT-__.- .. .-- _ _.. _. S101.25 __-._ .INSTRUMENT PARTS..-..-----. '--- ' 123331 ARK TECHNOLOGIES $19920.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 123332 ARROM TRLCK BODIES 9 EQUIP S19284.38 TRUCK PARTS _123331._. __..-_._ART_._kORKS__-_....-.--._--.T_.____--.._--. _ _ ..._.._. __ _ .. $197.34.-_------..----_--_-.---PHOTO_ PROCESSING.-�----.. - 1233:4 DENTAL INSURANCE CONSULT. S24.00 DENTAL INSURANCE CONSULTANT bti 123335 RALPH W ATKINSON $146.47 PUMP PARTS BFI PORTABLE SERVICES... __ 310T.25 EQUIPMENT RENTALS-_.__._._____._ -123336 _ .... 123337 ___ BRW SAFETY i SUPPLY ._ STT7.90 __ _.- SAFETY SUPPLIES. 123338. BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE S32.00 BACKFLOW TESTING __1233E9 _ '___....__BALL I4_CCSSTRLCTICH_CO. _..-. _._ _.A79535.00___._. _ ___...._ - MANHOLE ADJUETIHO-DIST_S._-_ 123340 BANANA ELLEPRINT $69461.97 BLUEPRINTING M.O.10-10-90 123341 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS $52.21 PUBLICATION --123342-_..--..._....BAT_TERY SPECIALTIES S681.25._ __-_--- BATTERIES.__-_-..-•-_---- 123343 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC S49849.27 LAB SUPPLIES 123344 BAYLESS SYA71CNERS $25.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES _-123345- _._ _ ..- DCA C.BEATTIE.P.E. ._ 5800.00 ._ _.. _..___ -ENGINEERING_ SERVICES 123346 ROBERT BE IN WILLIAM FROST S273.60 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-34 123347 BELL SECURITY S106.69 SAFETY CONSULTATION SERVICES 123348 J . 6 H SERGE INC $82.69 _ _. ___._.LAB SUPPLIES 123349 BCEHRINGEP MANNHEIM S497.64 LAB- 123350 BCISE CASCACE CFC PRCCUCTS $249933 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123351 BCN-A-RUES $483988 TRUCK PARTS 123352 BONNEVILLE EQUIP INC $250000 DOCUMENT RESEARCii 123353 PRENNER-FIEDLER 6 ASSOC IN S267.70 COMPRESSOR 123J54 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC. $19006.39 ELECTRIC MOTOR 123355 BUILCEROS EMPCRIUM S27.66 HARDWARE/LUMBER 1233E6 GARY G STREED $39256.29 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT G \ i FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/09/92 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNTY SANITATICN DISTRICTS OF CRANGE COUNTY - •--- -- CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING DATE 07/15/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123357 BUTLER PIPER CCPPAAY $79694.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1233ES CEM CCRPCRATION S80555.71 LAB SUPPLIES 123359 CH2M HILL i59215.35 ENGINEERING SERVICES 123360 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS• INC $456944 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 123361 CS COMPANY $59.47 VALVE 123362 CAL -CLASS FOR RESEARCH IAC. $814.59 LAB SUPPLIES 1233E3 CALTROL INC $39295.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123364 CAPITAL WESTWARD S254.08 REGULATOR PARTS 123365 CENTURY SAFETY INST R SUPP $19259.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123366 CHEVRON LSA INC S59940.07 LUBE OIL 123367..._ CI60 BELLA S355.56 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE 123368 CLEVELAND COTTON PROD S187.83 LAB SUPPLIES 123369 COMPUSA9 INC. $29291.80 COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE 123370 - COMPUSERVE 112.69 COMPUTER SERVICES 123371 CONNELL CM PARTS I DIV S376.41 TRUCK PARTS 123372 CONSCLICATED ELECTRICAL CIST S59021.62 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES --- 123373----.---_.._...CCATIAEATAL AIR .. TOCLS 1NC. - .. S39549.09 TOOLS m X 123374 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO S29424.38 CHLORINE 123375 CONTRACTOROS BOOK STORE S197.50 PUBLICATION ---123376 CONTROL CATA CCRP d/OR S935.50 INSTRUMENT tXJ 123377 CCCPER INEUSTRIES INC S975.68 COMPRESSOR PARTS 123378 CCUNTY LhCLESALE ELECTRIC S126.96 ELECTRIC PARTS - _123379 CRISP PUBLICATIONS9 INC S501.50 PUBLICATION 123380 CROWN FENCE CO S39336.00 FENCING I� 123381 CRYSTAL CLEAR ►INDOW PAINT. $29250@00 NCLEANING (V •• 123382 STATE BCAFC CF EGLILIZATICA S385.27 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEES _ 123383 STATE WATER RESCLRCES CCNTRCL $39.09 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK CLEANUP FEES 123384 DAILY PILCT $95.00 NOTICES & ADS 123385 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE S29371.55 TIRES 123386 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO S144.84 VALVE PARTS 123387 DIALCG IAFORYATION SERVICES S84014 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 123388 DIATEC EKVIRCKMERTAL $39721.14 CHEMICALS 123389 DIETERICF - POST CO $68.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123390 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES S39354@27 PRINTING 123391 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 52897D3.08 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 123392 SYCON CCPP S146.93 PRINTING SUPPLIES'_ 123353 DICNEX CORP. $19036.95 LAB SUPPLIES _ 123344 DCRACC EDTERFRISES INC S924.82 PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS -_ 123395 ROBERT F ORIVER ASSOC S1149271.00 INSURANCE POLICIES 123396 DUNN EDWARDS CORP S59727.56 PAINT SUPPLIES 123397 D'VALS SALES $578.85 FITTINGS 123398 DYRALCO CCN7RCLS $39306.48 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123359 EPA SERVICES INC S39684.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-44, J-23-2 123400 EASTPAN INC S49171.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123401 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT S60.68 TRUCK'PARTS 123402 EXCELLENCE IN TRAINING S333.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION FUND AC 9199 - JT GIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/09/92 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - ------- CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING DATE 07/15/92 WARRANT NC. VENCCR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION - 1234U3 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S239178.70 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M-0.10-9-91 123404 JOHN B FALKENSTEIN PE $39400000 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16-,__ _ 123405 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP $221.00 AIR FREIGHT 123406 FERRELLEAS 8140.33 PROPANE 012340 . __ ._ ... ._FILTER SIFPLY CC__._ . _ _ . _ S264.79 MECHANICAL PARTS 123408 FISCFER 9 PCR7ER CO S817.54 CHLORINATION PARTS 123409 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO S29466.78 LAB SUPPLIES 123410 .. FLO-SYSTEMS S199369.C8 PUMP PARTS 123411 CLIFFCRD A FORKERT S109036.02 SURVEY SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 123412 FCUNTAIR VALLEY CAMERA $38.40 FILM 123413_. .. _..___..-FCX.INDLSTRIAL.SOLES S19631.45 PAINT SUPPLIES 123414 CITY OF FULLERTCN S81.38 WATER USE 123415 GANAHL LUMBER CO $140008 BUILDING MATERIALS 123416 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY S19454.63 CHEMICALS 123417 GENERAL ELECTRIC CC $580.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123418 GENERAL TELEPHONE CC $383.30 TELEPHONE SERVICES rn .___12341L__.._. .-_ GIERLICkeM17CPELL . IAC. S5*884.85 MECHANICAL PARTS___- X 123420 GRAPHIC CCNTRCLS $471.54 OFFICB SUPPLIES 123421 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $202900 FILM r--� - 123422 OCN..GREEM 6 ASSOCIATES S59870000 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 _ W 123423 HB TYPE S GRAPHICS S266.42 PRINTING ~ 123424 HARBCLR ENGINEERING $89678.00 PUMP PARTS 123425.. _. HARRINGTCA IAOUS7RIAL _PLASTI S3*204.49 VALVES bd 123426 HATCH & KIRK INC $19016.18 MECHANICAL PARTS - 1 123427 PL HAWN CO INC S47.41 FILTER w 123428 HILTI INC - S810.01 FITTINGS 123429 HCERBIGER CVS CALIF INC S270.24 FILTERS 1234:0 J.T. PORVATh 6 ASSOC. $29887.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17 __.123431 _. RS HUGHES CC INC $570.04 - PAINT SUPPLIES 123432 HUNTER CORPORATION S7869494.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 1234:3 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA S68.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123434 HUNTINGTCN SUPPLY $49.88 HARDWARE 123435 HLNTINGTCN VALLEY SCHNINN C S29508995 BICYCLE PARTS 123436 I.G. 1NCUSTRIAL CORP. S19298.16 CHEMICALS 123437 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $399236943 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O_.1.1-14-90 123438 INDUSTRIAL FILTER FFGS $583.69 FILTERS 123439 INDUSTRIAL ThREACED PRCCLC7S S19278.80 CONNECTORS 123440 INCRAF PAFER $19851936 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123441 INLANC EFFIRE WHITE• GHC 8459567.04 TRUCKS M.O.4-8-92 123442 INTERMOUNTAIN SCIENTIFIC CORP S39720.74 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123443 INSTRUMENT SPECIALISTS S99182.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 123444 INTERSTATE BATTERY SVSTEFS $29599@54 BATTERIES 123445 IRVINE RRNCh WATER CISTRIC7 S84.66 WATER USE 12'3446 GREAT LEE7ERN SANITARY SUPP $39098932 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES _ 123447 JAYIS CATERING S19,052.30 DIRECTORS' MEETING E%PENSB* 123448 JENSEN TOOLS INC 8718.14 TOOLS s rn x 2 J. .� hC 9 99 - 1 J T DIET 1iCRK1hG CAPITAL PROCESSING OATS 7/09/92 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 - - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING DATE 07/25/92 WARRANT NC. VEhCCR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123449 JOHN STONE SUPPLY S578.60 ELECTRIC PARTS 123450 : KAR PRODUCTS S46.47 FITTINGS _..... _..... 123451 THE KEITN CCMPANIES S954.90 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35 & 5-36 123452 KING BEARING IRC S2936R.57 MACHINE SUPPLIES 1234'3- -- KACX IACL:TRIAL SUFRLIES 449020.73 TOOLS 123454 MARTIN KCRCICK SR $29941.10 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 123455 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO $426.65 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 123456 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO $45.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES _ 1234E7 LAB SUPPORT S496ROoDO TEMPORARY SERVICES 12345E LAY CFFICES OF RCBERT L LAVOIE $528929 LEGAL SERVICES - FLORES V. DALEY -1234°5 .. LEE61RO SFELVIhG 9 FILE SYS. $68.33 OFFICE SIIPPyIES.. 123460 LIEBERT CCRPCRA71ON $59.88 BATTERIES 123461 MDS AUTOMATION CONTROLS S296.32 METER 123462. MPS $385.41 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 123463 MACOPCO $372.45 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 123464 MAGNETEK RATIONAL ELECTRIC $29659.64 PUMP REPAIRS 1234E5--- .-_.... MAINTENANCE FRCCLC7S _-IhC $81040694 MECHANICAL PARTS Y 123466 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $35.01 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123467 DON MAURER S29125.00 OCEAN MONITORING 123468 -. .-MC FADDEN DALE HARDWARE CO S61.87 MACHINE SUPPLIES 123469 MEASUREMEhl CONTROL SYS INC S144.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123470 PICRCAGE CF CERRITCS S243.13 OFFICE FURNITURE 123471 PIC6AY PVC 9 PACHINIhG $29779.95 PUMP PARTS__-__ . 123472 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL FRES. S33.55 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123473 MISCO $44.84 LAB SUPPLIES 123474 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO $452.00 ELECTRIC PARTS V 123475 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $19045000 LAB SERVICES 123476 MCTICK IhCUSTRIES INC $567.66 HARDWARE 123417 NA7ICRIL ACACEMY FRESS $66.17 PUBLICATION 123478 NA7IChAL SAFETY COUNCIL $69.35 SAFETY FILM RENTAL 123479 NEW BRUNSWICK SCIENTIFIC S414.10 LAB SUPPLIES 123480 NEWARK ELECTRONICS S633.04 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123481 CITY OF REWPCRT BEACH $5.43 WATER USE 123482 NCVA P06EP IhC 829223.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 12:4E3 OFFICE FAVILICKIIN7ERICR RES 9871.4E OFFICE FURNITURE 123484 THE CHPART CORP $1*152.96 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123485 DX SYSTEMS CO $219001.49 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91 123486 ORANGE CCLNTY CHEMICAL CO $791051 CHEMICALS 123467 CRANCE CCLNTY FARM SUPPLY C S19014e16 TOOLS 12348B CRANCE VALVE 9 F1171NG CC. $19446.60 FITTINGS 123489 CSCARIS LCCK & SAFE $60.34 KEY CABINET A_ - 123490 OXYGEN SERVICE $29566.56 SPECIALTY GASES 123491 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT S69093.47 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 123492 PSOCIPOCL SUFPLY OF OCI S44.64 BLEACH 123493 PSSI S1r254.40 _ T.V. SEWER SERVICES 123494 PACIFIC FARTS $89058.37 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/09/92 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY --.-- .-.- CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING DATE 07/15/92 WARRANT N09 VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ---.. 123495 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $29179.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES 12395E PACIFIC FELL S13934 TELEPHONE SERVICES 123497 PAGENET S54.00 PAGER RENTALS 123498 PALMIER]• TYLER9 WIENER• $1953 4.23 LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELLS PARKSON CCRPCRATION.__ $49611049 PLUMBING SUPPLIES. -- ...___..----_-__ 123500 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION S730942 LAB SUPPLIES 123501 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $1129587*55 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 _..123502....._• _ - ... PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE S76.26 HARDWARE 123503 POLYPURE INC $159535.09 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 123504 POWER TRACK INC $36964 PUMP PARTS _ .123505...... _-._ _._ .-PRECISICN . INCUSTRIES S39089.79 HARDWARE 1235CE HARCLC FFIMRCSE ICE S2R7.00 ICE 123507 THE PROJECT SCLUTIONS CO. $49720*00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 123508. AQUA-CHEM* INC S542.13 INSTRUMENT PARTS _• 123509 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS S317.53 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 123510. STEVE P9 FADOS9 INC9 11169588.00 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-lA-2 m .. -_123511... -: RAINECW EISFCSAL CC S19430.09 TRASH REMOVAL X 123512 RAM SYS7EM TECHNCLOGIES INC S214.42 PUBLICATION = 123513 RAININ INSTRUMENT C099 INC $194967 LAB SUPPLIES � 123514 RED WING SHOES $245.67 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES _ 123515 REOI EXPPESS S69.30 COURIER SERVICES --� 123516 REMECY TEMP $710040 TEMPORARY SERVICES 123517 REMOTE PETER RESE77ING SYST S59000.00 POSTAGE METER RENTAL._-_ 123518 MCJUNKIN-REPUELIC SUPPLY S79636.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES V1 123519 RENOLD INC. S44.2J MECHANICAL PARTS -_123520 J R ROBERTS CORM 5769517.00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-1 _ ,•____ 123521 RYAN-HERCC $19073*03 FITTINGS 123522 JCSEPH 7 RYERSCN I SCN IN $39344*57 METAL ...123523 SAF71KIFE INC S614.45 ELECTRIC PARTS - 123524 SAFETY-KLEEN COFP. $161950 PARTS CLEANER 123525 SAFETY SUPPLY OF AMERICA 1209.52 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123526 SANCCN ENGINEERING INC $600*00 MANHOLE REPAIRS DIST 7 - -- 123527 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $514.84 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123528 SCIENCE AFPLICAlIONS INT9L 5879778.0E OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-12-91 123529 SCCTT SPECIALTY GASES INC $308099 SPECIALTY GASES 123530 SEA -BIRD ELECTRONICS INC S382.00 LAB SUPPLIES 123531 SEA- COAST DESIGNS S70.94 OFFICE MACHINE 123512 SERPENTIR CCNVEYCR CORP S278999 MECHANICAL PARTS _ 1235'3 SFAMRCCK SUFFLY $19709.69 TOOLS & HARDWARE 123534 ShAS7A ELECTRIC $29500900 ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS - LAB 123535 SHIP 8 SHORE SHEETMETAL 1482.20 ELECTRICAL PARTS 123536 SHIVA CORP S19709.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 123537 SHURELUCK SALES 1428.24 HARDWARE 123538 SIGMA CFEPICAL CO $94.16 LAB SUPPLIES _ 1235:5 SMITH-EMEFY CC S29655.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 123540 SMITH PIFE S SUPPLY INC S12912 PLUMBING SUPPLIES t 1 F ti0 NC 9199 - JT DIST W(RKINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/09/92 PAGE G REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNTY SANI7ATICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY _.._ CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING DATE 07/15/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123541 SCUTFERN CALIF EOISON CO $26s851.94 POWER 123542 SO CALIF EDISON CC $105*790.83 POWER 123543 SO CAL GAS CO S109223.28 NATURAL GAS 123544 SO CALIF WATER CO S38.67 WATER USE -.123545- SOUTHERN COUNTIES CIL CC $452.62 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 123546 SP4RKLE7TS DRINKING WATER S29945.39 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTAL 123547 STAMEN 2 SFASSCFF FE S19400000 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.3-11-92 123548 WESTALLCY INC $189.43 WELDING SUPPLIES 123549 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC S476.85 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123550 SUMMIT STEEL $555099 METAL 123551 SUPELCO .INC - $19368078 LAB SUPPLIES 123552 SUPER CHEF CCRP $379.87 CHEMICALS 1235°3 SLFER FC&ER FRCCUCTS S19034.40 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123554 T 6 M CCNIRACT GLAZING S957.00 GLASS 123555 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG COMPANY $19321.12 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 123556 TAYLOR INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE S29910.01 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 123'_57 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY S215.11 MACHINE SUPPLIES 123558 TRAFFIC CCNTRCL SERVICE INC $868.47 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123559 TRAVEL TRAVEL $69664000 TRAVEL SERVICES 123560 TRUCK 6 AUTC SUPPLY INC S612.82 TRUCK PARTS 123561 TUSTIN DODGE S68.79 TRUCK PARTS 123562 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $50455075 LAB SERVICES 123563 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $388.56 PARCEL SERVICES 123564 UNITED SLATES ELEVATOR CORP S543.22 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 123565 VLR SC1EAlIFIC $29948.81 LAB SUPPLIES 123566 VALIN CCRPORATION S564.24 REGULATOR PARTS 123567 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $29766.46 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123568 VAN WATER 6 ROGERS $19286.75 CHEMICALS 123569 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $29924.77 PRINTING 123570 VARIAN AKILYTICAL INSTRUMENTS S29306.78 LAB SUPPLIES 123571 VERTEX SYSTEMS 3129147.25 OFFICE EQUIPMENT/COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 123572 VILLAGE NURSERIES $21.44 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 123573 VOLLER• SAVAGE & ASSOC S431.25 INSURANCE & RISK MANAGEMENT CONSULTING_ 123574 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 1339360.75 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90 123575 WES71N ENGINEERING S10o967.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 123576 WFSTRUX INTERNATIONAL S413.53 TRUCK PARTS 123577 kCRTFINCTCN FCRD $869452.17 TRUCKS M.0.4-8-92 123578 XEROX CCRP S9s535.14 COPIER LEASES 123579 ZIEBARTH AND ALPF.R ----------------- $669801.00 _ CONSTRUCTION P1-34-i TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 ----------------- S399149161.37 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/09/92 PAGE-7- REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING DATE 07/25/92 - ---- - SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND -- ---_ ___ _ $142.28- #1 CAP FAC FUND $127,140.50 #2 OPER FUND $15,166.60 #2 CAP FAC FUND $573.37 - _-- - -----_--- #3 OPER FUND $17,123.89 #5 OPER FUND $14,897.79 #5 CAP FAC FUND __-_ .. _-•- ._-. _ - ._ _. $2, 714.38 #6 OPER FUND $99.65 - - #7 OPER FUND $3,859.83 #7 CAP PAC FUND $583.98 - - - - -- --- - --- #11 OPER FUND $8,159.00 #13 OPER FUND $24.19 #14 OPER FUND - - $58.19 x #24 CAP FAC'FUND $9,911.26 _ #5&6 OPER FUND $1,917.20 �-� #7&14 OPER FUND $22.08 JT OPER FUND $754,027.41 CORP $2,737,571.94 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS -- $57,420.7E w JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $172,757.07 I-------------- v $3,914,162.37 eae�aaaaaae�a= i FORD NO 9199 - JT DIST LCPKIKG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92 WARRANT.NC. V£RDOR 123601 AG TECH C CMPA NY 123602 ASR ANALYSIS 123603 A T 9 T 123604 AMERICAR IELEPHORE & TELEGRAPH 1236E5 A T S T 1236L6 ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC 123607 ACTION RENTALS 123608 ADVANCED CCOLING TECHNOLOGIES 123609 AIR PHCTC SERVICES 123610 AIR FRCCLCTS & CHEMICAL IR 123611 - ALPHAGAZ 123612 AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH 123613 AMERICAN MEDIA INC 123614 ROBCO IRC 11CR AMERICAN SEALS 123615 AMERICAR TYPE CULTURE COLLECIK 123616 CHARLES E. ANDERSON 123617 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 123618 ANIXTER - DISTRIBUTICN 123619 A -PLUS SISTEMS 123E20 ABC LABCRAICRIES 123621 AQUATIC TESTING LABORATORY 123622 ARATEK SERVICES INC 123623 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT 123624 ART LORKS 123625 ASSCCIAIEC DIESEL 123626. ASSOC. AOFINIS. & CORSULTARTS 123627 BKK LANDFILL 123628 BRW SAFETY & SUPPLY 123629 -. .B BATEMAK 123620 BATTERY SFECIAL71ES 123631 BAXTER CIACKOSTICS IRC 123632. BAYLESS STATIONERS 123633 J & H BERGE INC 123634 BOYLE EREINEERIKG CORP -.123635 BRENKER-FIEOLER I ASSOC IR 12!6'.6 OLCGET vARITCPIAL 123637 BUILDEROS EMPORIUM .123638 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC 123639 GARY G $TREED 123640 BUTLER PAPER COMPARY .123641 SLMMIT SCILTICRS• INC 123642 CS C CMPA RY 123643 CARLETON ENGINEERS .123644 JOHN CARCLLO EKGINEEP.S 123645 CHARLES L CARTER CO 12364E DICK CEPEK IRC AMOUNT DESCR IPT ION $669588.85 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 S880.00 ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS - - S39246.20 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES S19504.01 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES S513.69 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES -•- ---- S50.00 LAB SERVICES S19785.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT S451.41 ELECTRIC PARTS 5280.1E AERIAL PHOTOS S169815.00 0&M AGREEMENT O%Y. GEN SYST M.0.8-9-89 $882.56 SPECIALTY GASES S75.00 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS S48.95 VHS TAPE PREVIEWS S 72 7.31 PUMP PARTS S508.25 LAB SUPPLIES S275.00 MACHINE REPAIRS $19036.59 LAB SUPPLIES S502.04 COMPUTER PARTS $39342.66 NOTICES & ADS S29165.00 LAB SERVICES $500.00 LAB SERVICES $49288.57 UNIFORM RENTALS $482.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS S106.03 AWARDS FRAMING $672#60 ENGINE PARTS S270.00 MEDICAL INSURANCE ,APKI ISTRATtON_ S289524.13 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 S58.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES $600.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION _... S260.47 BATTERIES $79787.92 LAB SUPPLIES $94.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES._.. S218.87 LAB SUPPLIES S339260.69 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-30 $19836.54 . COMPRESSOR ._., -_ ____ $137.50 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES S66.42 HARDWARE/LUMBER $1072.00 SURVEY SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 S4*646.84 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT $208.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES S49180@37 SERVICE AGREEMENT $49466.62 VALVES S187.5G ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.5-9-90 $1299556.06 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-20, P2-43, P1-34 $188.61 TRUCK PARTS S166.10 TRUCK PARTS m X S to C) 1 N FUND NC 9199 - JT DTST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNTY SANI7ATICN DISTRICTS OF CRANGE COUNTY - - CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION -• 123647 ChEVRCN LSA INC $39303090 OIL & GREASE 123648 CCASIAL CFLCRIKATIOK $39420.00 WATER SYST. CHLORINATION _. 123649 CCLICh ANC SCNS S292759075.00 CONSTRUCTION I-9 123650 COMPUSA♦ INC. S59ijS5.70 COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE 123651. COMPUSERVE S26.27 COMPUTER SERVICES 1236E2 CONNELL CM PARTS / DIV $43.70 TRUCK PARTS 123653 COKSCLICAIEC ELECTRICAL LIST S89248.22 ELECTRIC PARTS 123654 CCNTAINERIZED CHEMICAL DISPO $69294.75 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 123655 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC $331.82 TOOLS 123656 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO S1*616.25 CHLORINE M.0.9-9-91 1236E7 CCNTINEN70L GRAPHICS S590.13 PRINTING 123658 CCCPER INCUS7RIES IKC i1IP049.71 COMPRESSOR PARTS 12!EE9 CCCRCINA7EC EGLIF CC IKC S375.00 MACHINE PARTS 123660 CCSTA MESA AUTC SUPPLY slou21l.38 TRUCK PARTS _ _... 123661 R E COULTER CRANE RENTAL S666.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 123662 COUNCIL OF BIOLOGY EDITORS $60.90 PUBLICATIONS 123603 STATE CF CALIFCRNIA 5876.55 PROCUREMENT FEES - VEHICLES-•.._•,___�_` _ 123664 STATE CF CALIFCRNTA S157.50 HAZARDOUS WASTE TAX 1236E5 STATE CF CALIFCRKIA $321.24 DIESEL USE FEES 123666 DAMES 8 CCCRE S24v175.92 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-3 123667 PETER C DAVID CO S1679383.50 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2 123668 DE ANZA CORPORATION S150.DO EQUIPMENT RENTAL 123669 HSK/DECKER S319.97 INSTRUMENT PARTS _- 123670 DEZURIK AND/CR CS CO $29721951 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123671 _ DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CCRP S99588.68 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 123672 DORADO ENTERFPISES INC $100.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS 123673 ROBERT F DRIVER ASSOC $6459169.00 PROPBRTX INSURANCE M.O-f-8-92" 123674 DUNN EDLARDS COOP $79322.99 PAINT SUPPLIES .123675..._ __ EAS7PAN INC _ S59113.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES __ 12367E ECOANALYSIS INC $49090.34 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.1-17-91 r __ 123677 ELECTRO-•TEST INC $39258.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 123678 ELECTRO NUMERICS INC $164009 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 123679 ENCHANTER INC $79280.00 OCEAN MONITORING H.0.7-17-91 123680 EIT S260.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS __123681.__ .._ ERVIRCNMEN7AL PRCC. USA S99686.T3 TRUCK PARTS _ ._ __ __• •____� 123662 ENVIRCNPENTAL RESOURCE ASSCC S646.50 LAB SERVICES 123683 MARSHALL FAT RRES 5178.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 123684.._ FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S179041.22 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M-0.10-9-91 123685 JOHN B FALKENSTEIN FE $39400.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16 123666 FAN PRESS $54.51 OFFICES SUPPLIES 12368.7_ FEDERAL EMPRESS CCRF $336.75 AIR FREIGHT 123688 CHEMYEST INC S749.94 SCRUBBER PARTS 123689 FISCHER B PORTER CO S39233.10 CHLORINATION PARTS _.123690 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO S370.44 LAB SUPPLIES �.-__,______•_ 123691 FLO-SYSTEPS 54iP818.73 PUMP PARTS 123692 FCRBES CCMPUTER GROUP INC 580.00 FREIGHT �..., � NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING AP A C IT L PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92 WARRANT NO.. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123693 FOUNTAIN .VALLEY CAMERA $50.09 FILM 123694 FCUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT S851.55 PAINT SUPPLIES 123695 FCX ENIEPPRISES $19825@00 SAFETY CONSULTANT 123696 FOX INDUSIRIAL SALES S36.85 ELECTRIC PARTS 123697 FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT $139716.57 COMPRESSOR PARTS 123698 BUD FREY $71.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION _ 123699 GANAHL LIPBER CO 919634.59 HARDWARE 123700 GATES FIEERGLASS IRSTALLERS S79500.00 FIBERGLASS REPAIRS 1237E1 GENERAL CCEAhICS9 INC. $283.37 LAB SUPPLIES 123702 GENERAL IELEPHONE CO $49233.98 TELEPHONE SERVICES 123703 VITALY GOROOETSKY $131.72 DEFERRED COMP PAY/OFF-., 123704 GOVERNMENI INSTIIUTES INC S69.00 PUBLICATIONS 1237C5 GRAHAM d uAPES $1*767.42 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.8-14=91' 1237E6 GRAPhIC CISIRIBUICRS $10146046 FILM 123707 DCh GREEN 6 ASSOCIATES $199635.00 SURVEY SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 123708 HSQ TECHNOLOGY $5189400.00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2 & P2-44 123709 -- HB .TYPE 9 GRAPHICS - - .. $71.12 __. PRINTING M 123710 HACH CCMFANY $29767.26 SAFETY SUPPLIES X 123711 FRED A FARPER $19500000 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION = 123712 HARRIhGTCb INDUSTRIAL PLAS71 S497.38 PLU14BING SUPPLIES 123713 HATCP 6 KIRK INC S159864.69 MECHANICAL PARTS ,-, 123714 HAULAYAY CONTAINERS $49860600 TRASH REMOVAL -1 123715 PL HAWN CO INC -3481.95 _. ___ FILTERS.__ 123716 HELLO S207.09 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 123717 HEWLETT FACKARD CO S339298.52 LAB EQUIPMENT W -123718 HILTI INC _ S673.99 ELECTRIC PARTS 123719 HCEFER SCIENTIFIC INSTR. S29081995 LAB SUPPLIES 123720 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC $19874.68 COMPRESSOR PARTS -- 123721----.-- -_RC --.HOFFMAN--AND/OR -.ISCO -.--- 8239277.23. SAMPLER 123722 J.T. hORVATH 9 ASSOC. S39000000 _ CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17 123723 RS HLGhES CC INC $655096 PAINT SUPPLIES -123724 _ HUhTER CCRPORATION $309v337.O0 _ _ CONSTRUCTION J-19-_1 123725 HUNTIN670N BEACH RUBBER STA $232.20 _ OFFICE SUPPLIES - - 123726 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHYINN C S387.83 BICYCLE PARTS -.12372.2.._ -_..._ _- _.. HURLEV_.. ELECTRONICS _- INC. _. ..._ S23.55 ... _ __.... ELECTRONICS . SUPPLIES 123728 I C F INC $50.00 PUBLICATION - 123729 I.G. INCLEIRIAL CCRP. S29714.47 FERROUS CHLORIDE M.0.4-8-92 1MC INDUSTRIES S961.80 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123731 ISCO INC $169.83 INSTRUMENT PARTS ­ -- - - - 123732 IMPERIAL LEST CHEMICAL $419459.72 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-14-90 _.123733__. _ IhCRAC PAFER _ 5883.9E OFFICE SUPPLIES 123734 INLAhC EPFIRE EGLIFYENI CC. S269260.83 TRUCK M.0.5-14-92 - 123735 INTEHPOUNTAIN SCIENTIFIC CCRP S59281.91 LAB EQUIPMENT __.123736_._.. _ INSTRUMENT SPECIALISTS $39032.5D INSTRUMENT SERVICES_ 123737 INTERCONNECTIONS S29160.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 123736 IBM CORPCRA71ON S348.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT n I X FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY -- ----- • ----•- CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123739 PACTEL TELETRAC S35.00 TELEPHONE SERVICES 123740 JLA CREDIT CORP S145932 MICROFICHE READER LEASE ___ •. __._. 123741 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP S783901 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123742 JIPOS SLSFENSICN SERVICE $50.00 TRUCK PARTS 123743- JCHNSCN PCWER OF NO.AMERICA S388.85 MECHANICAL PARTS __.___•- __ _ _ �.____,_ 123744 JORDAN CONTROLS INC $247.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123745 KING REAPING INC $262*78 MACHINE SUPPLIES 123746 KNCS 1NOLSTRIAL SUPPLIES $19625.71 TOOLS -.__._._... 123747 PAPTIN KCRDICK SR S29999.20 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 123748 LAB SUPPORT S39149.25 LAB SERVICES 123749 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT_L LAVOIE S50.00 LEGAL, SERVICES.- FLORES__._.•_ 123750 LEGI-TECH S27590C COURIER SERVICES 1237EI KP LINDSTROM INC $69518.80 CONSULTING SERVICE - NPDES 123752 LCRAIN PRCDUCTS S19251930 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT - RE_LI_AN__C_8_PO_WER Y _ 123753 MPS 58962 CE PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 123754 MAINFRAME SERVICE INC S39622.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 123755 MANLEYOS BOILER REPAIR C09 INC S19filfi935 VALVE_- 123756 MANTEK S19549.99 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 1237E7 MATT - CHLOR INC $19016.00 CHLORINATION PARTS 1237E8.. MCDAIN INSTPVVENTS S39233.87 INSTRUMENT _... _.._. 1237!9 MCGARRY CERTPAL TYFEWRITER 1 $19564.00 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 123760 MEASUREGUIPMENT INC S59257900 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 123761 MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL. MARKETS S309799.52 _ _--_ REMARKETING AGREEMENT 123762 MICROAGE COMPUTER S19243.43 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 123763 MIDWAY MFG E MACHINING $39341911 MACHINE REPAIRS 1237E4 MILLIPORE ANC/OP WATERS _ $937915 _ LAB -SUPPLIES 123765 MILLTRONICS $240*71 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123766, MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRESS $617005 OFFICE MACHINE -.-123767-.. '___.__.-MITCHELL PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS . $659610.00 _ -__ . _ CONSTRUCTION 7-11-2 1237E8 MOTICN INDUSTRIES INC $23921 HARDWARE 123769 MCTORCLA INC $132.50 COMPUTER SOFTWARE .123710 _.,_- NA7ICNAL IATEP RESEARCH _ S509000900. ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION M.0._7-1_7-91 -_ �- -- 123771 NEW BRUKS61CK SCIENTIFIC S123.26 LAB SUPPLIES 123772 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $245995 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES _-123173-_- .__.NORCAL ._.CONTROLS -INC. .- 319170.17 .. ------ MECHANICAL PARTS --......--- - •-- 123774 OI COPPCPATION S95.25 LAB SUPPLIES 123775 OCCUPATICAAL VISION SERVICES $925*04 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY GLASSES 12..77E CFFICE FP%ILICN/INIERICP RES S793981 OFFICE FURNITURE ._ 123777 UM SYSTEMS CO $149573.17 _ CHLbAiNB H.0.10-9-41. 123778 ON-LINE ELECTRONICS $105.06 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES .123779 __.� _ ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO* $19822940 FITTINGS - 123780 CXYGEN SERVICE $469058 SPECIALTY GASES 123781 CCLN7Y SON17ATICN CISTRIC7 S658976 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 123702. _ CSOCC SELF -FUNDED MEDICAL I $100*000000 PREMIUM ADVANCE 1237b3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $149393945 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE•--- - 123784 PACIFIC PARTS $212.61 INSTRUMENT PARTS F11NC NC 9199 - JT GIST UCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 -- --- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION m x 2 C") I Vl 123785 PACO PUMPS 123786 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT 123787 PACIFIC EELL 1237E8 PACIFIC IATER CCNDITICNING 123789 PACTEL MEFIDIAN SYSTEMS 123790 PAK WEST 123791 PARTS UNLIMITED 123792 ROY PENDEPGRAFT 223793 PEPKIN-ELDER CORFORATION 123794 PHCTC & SOLNC CO 123795 PIONEER BANK 123796 PITNEY BODES 123797 POLYFURE INC 123798 PORTER RCILER SERVICE INC 123799 PCST CONSLMER PRCCUCTS 123860 PC�ER ELECTPC SLPPLY CC 123801 POWER SYSTEMS 123802 PRECISION INDUSTRIES 123803 PREMIER PRINTING CORP. 123804 - HAROLC PRIMROSE ICE 123805 PRCFESSICNAL SERVICE 1ND. 123866 THE PROJECT SCLUTIONS CO. 123801 PULSAFEEDER 123808 AQUA-CHEM9 INC 123809 QUALITY RLILDING SLPPLY 123810 RPM ELECTRIC MCTORS 123811 STEVE P. RADOS9 INC. 123812 RECYC INC ..123813 RED .WING SHOES 123814 REDI 123815 REDI EXPRESS 12ZE1E RE1SF MARINE STLCIES9 INC 123817 NCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY 123818 PEGGY RUPP --123819..... JCSEPH T RYERSON S SCN 123820 SAFT/NIFE INC 123821 SAFETY--KLEEN CCRF -_123822... SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 123823 RICHARD E. SCHLEGEL 123824 SEA COAST DESIGNS _123825._ SERPEK7IX CCNVEYCR CORP 12362E SPAMRCCK SCIENTIFIC SPEC SYS 123827 ShAMRCCK SUPPLY 123828 SHASTA ELECTRIC 123829 SHURELUCK SALES 123830 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO $664043 PUMP PARTS CO 3249972.22 SAFETY SUPPLIES S614.16 TELEPHONE SERVICES C S68.40 RENTAL EQUIPMENT $55.97 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS $41.57 JANITORIAL SERVICES $19433.99 TRUCK PARTS S460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION S684.74 LAB SUPPLIES $48.42 OFFICE FURNITURE $72*779.10 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-3473 S452.02 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 9139500.26 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.7-17-91 $269.57 PACKING MATERIALS $89911.98 PRINTING S901.39 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES $914056 GENERATOR S19163.46 FITTINGS S59471.55 PRINTING $259.00 ICE S19374.00 SOILS TESTING S49720.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 S500.73 PUMP PARTS $29341.90 _ INSTRUMENT PARTS $83.72 BUILDING MATERIALS 519666.48 ELECTRIC PUMP REPAIR $5889268982 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A-2 S529032.76 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91 S227.57 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES S 74 3.31 MAP INDEXES $56.70 COURIER SERVICES S19063.00 OCEAN MONITORING $59009.32 PLUMBING SUPPLIES $540.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION IN S349.68 METAL S282.83 ELECTRIC PARTS $86.70 PARTS CLEANER $29046.16 PLUMBING SUPPLIES S39000000 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL $109090 OFFICE EQUIPMENT $29964.04 MECHANICAL PARTS $412.32 LAB SUPPLIES- $19057e24 TOOLS $99700.00 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS S79466.21 PAINT*SUPPLIES S361.41 PUBLICATIONS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - -.. -.-- --- - CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92 WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION -- -- - - 123831 SILVERI 8 LE BOUEF S6559011.90 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3 123832 SMITH-EMEFY CO S1s610.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 _ 123833 SC CCAST AIR QUALITY $29375.00 PERMIT FEES 1238.4 SCLTf CCAS7 WATER $87.50 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 123835 SCUTEERN CALIF EDISON CO $202*331903 POWER 123836 SOUTHERN COUN71ES OIL CO 8109579.33 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 123837 SOUVENIR PHOTO S113.16 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 123638 WESTALLCY, INC $338.13 WELDING SUPPLIES 123839 SPECIAL FLASTIC SYSTEMS INC 964.65 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123840 SFEX INCIS7RIES INC 8527.35 LAB SUPPLIES 123841 SRECC FLEXIBLE $29662.64 TRUCK PARTS 123842 STATE STREET BANK S5.325.00 C.O.P. ADMIN FEES 123843 STERLING ART $47.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123844 SUBURBAN FCRD S409891.65 TRUCKS (3) M.0.4-8-92 123845 SUPMIT STEEL $276.50 METAL 123846 SLNSET F(RD $310.08 TRUCK PARTS 123847 SUPER CHEM CORP S29885.17 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES. M 123848 SUR-LITE CORPORATION S21*017.68 WASTE DIGESTER FLARES = 123849 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG COMPANY S1.212.51 ELECTRIC CART PARTS ►-; .- 12.eG0 TEKMAR CCMPANY S830.36 LAB. SUPPLIB3 W 123851 THE TEXWIPE COMPANY S95.12 VALVE 123852 CHARLES E 7WFAS $19373.80 BUILDING REPAIRS _123853 ._.-._ THCMPSON INOUSTRIAL SUPPLY- _ 5857.20 ._. __ _ _ HARDWARE .___,.__------- __._. (") 123854 TILE MATTERS S119.72 BUILDING MATERIALS 1 123855 TOYO LANDSCAPING CO S79986.74 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.11-13-91 _.123856 _ TRAVEL TRAVEL _._.. S29320.00 _ TRAVEL SERVICES 123857 TRUCK I AUTO SUPPLY INC $164079 TRUCK PARTS 1238°8 JG TUCKEF 6 SCN INC S925.14 INSTRUMENT PARTS -_.123859 -.__ __ __. DANIEL.TUNNICLIFE _ _ S87.87 _.. DEFERRED COMP-PAY/OFF_- 123860 TUSTIN DODGE S226.61 TRUCK PARTS 123861 US RENTALS S2020.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT _1238E2.__._ ULTRA SYSTEMS $19211@40 ENGINEERING SERVICES 123863 UNION BANK S79290.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION- 123864 UNOCAL S87.23 UNLEADED GASOLINE -123R65._. _. __._ UNITED_ .. CCNCRETE COMPANIES. . $376.91 _ _ __ __ CONCRETE 123866 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE S164.20 PARCEL 3BRVICES 123867 UNITED TAPE CORPORATION $63.19 PUBLICATION 1,238f8__ '. ..__YG/FISIGNE INSTRUMENTS. $129000.00 LAB EQUIPMENT 123869 VUR SCIENTIFIC $39147.40 LAB SUPPLIES 123870 VALLEY C171ES SLPPLY CC S79322.32 PLUMBING SUPPLIES _._123871_ -_ VANIER EUSINESS FORMS $29200962. _-PRINTING _. 123872 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS S19688096 LAB SUPPLIES 123873 VERNEOS PLUMBING S35.00 PLUMBING SERVICES __123874_ VERTEX SYSTEMS $19397.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 123875 VILLAGE NURSERIES S91.36 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 123816 VCRTEX IACL'SIRIES $270.00 DOOR REPAIRS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNTY SANITA7ION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123877 BCB 6ARE PHOTOGRAPHY $175.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES 123878 CARL WARFEA t CO $300.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR_.__.__,-._._ 123879 WATER EAVIRONMENT FED. S29225.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 123880 WESTERN. HIGHWAY PRODUCTS IN S255.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123881 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY SIT9526969 CAUSTIC SODA M.P.8-8-90.- 123882 WHATFAN LAB SALES INC S769.50 LAB SUPPLIES 123883 WILLIAMS R WILKINS $36.27 LAB SUPPLIES 1238E4 RCURKE I-ICCCRLFF A CR $799702.90 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 123885 GECRGE YARDLEY CC S59.64 VALVE 123886 YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEMS S232.56 FREIGHT 123887 RICHARD YOUNG PROD $29422.63 PRINTING SUPPLIES 123888 CARL ZEISS INC S159314.65 LAB EQUIPMENT 1238P9 ZIEBARTH I ALPER/C.S. ALPER S329754.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 123850 RICHARD E ECEAR 4200.00 ----------------- DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION n"I TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 $69843*037.4U X S SUMMARY C- ) #1 OPER FUND �l #1 CAP FAC FUND #2 OPER FUND . #2 CAP FAC FUND #3 OPER FUND --- #3 -CAP-'FAC FUND_._._ #5 OPER FUND #5 CAP FAC FUND -#6 OPER-. FUND _ #7 OPER FUND #7 CAP FAC FUND --#11-OPER FUND. _ #13 OPER FUND #14 OPER FUND #14-CAP FAC FUND #5&6 OPER FUND #6&7 OPER FUND #7&14 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND CORF -.SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS JT WORKING CAPITAL AMOUNT $4,131.74 $89,493.13 411,728.21 ._ .• $33,283.62 $42,076.74 $110,405.SO.- _ .. $7,901.23 $727,843.31 82,160.85. $74,552.62 $2,657.92- $615.99 $507,554.07 $3,505.22 $32.49 $6,578.48 _ :1,348,618.71 ..... - ---------------- - $3,566,669.69 $162,216.51_.- $135,371.08 $6,843,037.40 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 . 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 42728-8127 Telephone: (714) 462-2411 AGENDA SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 A minute excerpt has been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpt: DISTRICT 13 (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Anaheim re appointment of alternate Director, as follows: (*Mayor) Active Director Alternate Director Iry Pickler Fred Hunter* REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN SEPTEMBER 9, 1992 1) CONDOLENCES TO PAT MCGUIGAN ON HER HUSBAND'S DEATH JAMES D . MCGUIGAN, HUSBAND OF SANTA ANA COUNCIL MEMBER AND DISTRICT 3 DIRECTOR, PAT MCGUIGAN, PASSED AWAY ON THURSDAY , SEPTEMBER 3RD . MR. MCGUIGAN WAS A LONG TIME ORANGE COUNTY ATTORNEY AND ACTIVE IN LOCAL CIVIC AFFAIRS. 2) PRESENTATION OF 25 YEAR SERVICE PIN TO GARY STREED - GARY STARTED AS AN ACCOUNTANT IN SEPTEMBER 1967 IN AUGUST 1981 HE WAS PROMOTED TO ACCOUNTING �.d SUPERVISOR - IN SEPTEMBER 1984 GARY WAS APPOINTED CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE GENERAL MANAGER IN OCTOBER 1989 GARY WAS APPOINTED TO HIS CURRENT POSITION OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE - GARY IS IN CHARGE OF ALL ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES, PURCHASING AND WAREHOUSING AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SERVICES - THANKS FOR 25 YEARS OF FINE, DEDICATED SERVICE, GARY -ITEM 3 ON NEXT PAGE- A _ i 3) UPCOMING MEETINGS �..i A. DISTRICTS 1, 2. 3. 5, 6. 7 and 11 — THE BOARDS OF DISTRICTS 1, 2. 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 ARE SCHEDULED TO ADJOURN TO NEXT WEDNESDAY , SEPTEMBER 16 1992 AT 7:30 P.M.,. TO CONSIDER THEIR USER FEES FOR 1992-93 u B . EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE — THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY , SEPTEMBER 23RD AT 5:30 P.M. C . CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE — THE CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON TUESDAY , SEPTEMBER 29TH AT 5:30 P . M . —END OF REPORT— 04-115 MEETING DATE September 9, 1992 TIME 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 & 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS (RICHARDSON) . GRISET ..... --1!!!0-- - (BEYER) ............... BARRERA ... - (BEYER) ..... BARRERA .... V000' - (NORBY) ............... CATLIN ....... - (PONTIOUS) ... SALTARELLI .: (SC(YM ............... COLLINS ... - (ROTH) ...... STANTON ... (PLUMMER) ............. COX ....... JG - (FERRYMAN) ... WAHNER (MAIM ................ CULVER ...... - W-MICT 2 (BELL) ................ DENES .... — (GULLIXSON) .. WEDAA ....: (RICE) ................ EVNLAP... _ -_ (SCOTT) ..... COLLINS ... (............ FLORA .... �� - (BEYER) ..... BARRERA .... � (MAHONEY).............. FLORA ... - �L (MeCUNE) . . GRIFFIN . - (NORBY) ..... CATLIN ..... (RICHARDSON) ........... GRISET ..... (BELL) ...... DENES ..... - (WEDAA) .............. GULLUCSON . . (FLORA) ..... MAHONEY ... (PLUMMER) ............. HART ...... -_ (CULVER) .... MAIN ....... (MacALLISTER) ........... KELLY ...... - (PARKER) .... NELSON ..... T (FORSYTHE) ............ LASZLO ..... - (TYNES) ..... NEWTON ... A - (FLORA) ............... MAHONEY .. - (HUNTER) .... PICKLER ... (CULVER) .............. MAIN ..... ✓ _ (GRISET) ..... PULIDO .... (RICHARDSC............ M"VIWI eN (ROTH) ...... STANTON ... (HERMAN) ............. MINER...... - DiSTRICT 3 (PARKER) .............. NELSON ... - (DOTSON) .... SAPIEN .... ✓ (TYNES) ............... NEWTON ... O1/ - (NELSON) .... DUNLAP ..... & (DUNLAP) .............. WliSiiii ... - (NORBY) ..... CATLIN ..... J� _ (AGE) ................ PARTIN .... - (SCOTT) ..... COLLINS .... v - (HUNTER) .............. PICKLER ... - (MAIN) ...... CULVER ....... _ (HART) ................ PLUMMER .. - (RICE) ...... EVANS (PUCKETT) ............. PONTIOUS .. - (MAHONEY) ... FLORA ...... - (SALTARELL) ............ PUCKETT .... _ (MCCUNE) .... GRIFFIN ..... (GRISET) .............. PULIDO .... - (FORSYTHE) ... LASZLO .... (PULIDO) .............. RICHARDSON - (RICHARDSON) . uawm df ... � - (STANTON) ............. ROTH ..... - (HERMAN) .... MINER ..... (PONTIOUS) ............. SALTARELLI . - (AGE)....... PARTIN .... (CO)Q ................SANSONE .. - (HUNTER) .... PICKLER .... (DOTSON) .............. SAPIEN ..... _ (ROBITAILLE) .. SILVA ..... (HAMMOND) ............. SHERIDAN .. - (ROTH) ...... STANTON .... (ROBITAILLE) ............ SILVA ..... - (BATES) ..... SYLVIA .... (ROTH) ............... STANTON ... - DISTRICT 5 .... (MILLER) ............... SWAN .— (BATES) ............... SYLVIA - (HART) ...... PLUMMER .... (FERRYMANISHERRICKIREADE) . WAHNER .... (COX) ....... SANSONE ..(GULLIXSON) ............ WEDAA ..... - (STANTON) .... ROTH ...... (MOULTON•PATTERSC. ..... WINCHELL ... DISTRIM (SHERRICK) ... WAHNER .... STAFF OTHER (PLUMMER) ... HART .... SYLVESTER ...... WOODRUFF .. ✓ (STANTON) .... ROTH .... BROWN ....... ANWAR .... - DISTRICT7 ANDERSON ...... DEMIR..... - (SALTARELLI) .. PUCKETT .... CLAWSON ....... 00' FLEMING .... - (READE) ..... WAHNER .... DAWES ........ JG HOHENER ... - (BEYER) ..... BARRERA .... GORCZYCA ...... HOUGH ..... - (PLUMMER) ... COX ....... HASENSTAB ..... HOWARD .... - (PULIDO) ..... RK*IARDSCN HODGES ...... HUNT ..... - (STANTON) .... ROTH ..... KYLE ......... �y KNOPF ..... (HAMMOND) ... SHERIDAN .. LINDER ........ LEE ...... ✓ DISTRICT 11 NELLOR ........ _�L LINDSTROM - NELSON ....... LYNCH - (MOULTON- NICHOLS ....... SHAW ...... PATTERSOM .. WINCHELL ... JC/ OOTEN ........ STONE ..... (MacALLISTER) KELLY ...... _,/✓ RENESCU ...... WASON .... - (ROTH) ...... STANTON ... A/ SIMPSON ....... :,Zoe YOUNG .... A.-�. J DISTRICT 13 E ...... 'vv~ (WEDAA) ..... aULLU(SON .. VINvINCENT ......: (BEYER) ..... BARRERA ... WINSOR ....... (DUNLAP) .... AM 066W..... - (HUNTER) .... PICKLER ... - (STANTON) .... ROTH ..... - DISTRICT 14 ✓ (MILLER) ..... SWAN ..... - PONTIOU (PUCKETT).... BARRERA .... - (BEYER) ..... BARRERA ... - (STANTON) .... ROTH - (HAMMOND) ... SHERIDAN .. - 9.2.92 C.. fi m I /�:�r:1 I I �' � V • -77 Wi-MORMOMMA M- em CA) c7 C2-? ty • 9rj � �! �uex.• V 9/9/92 JOINT BOARD MEETING NOTES #6 a - Report of the Joint Chairman JC: This evening it is with deep regret and sorrow that I announce that Jim McGuigan, husband of Pat McGuigan passed away on Thursday, the 3rd of September. He was a long time Orange County Attorney. As a matter of fact, I went to law school with Jim. We graduated together in 1972. It is with great regret and a great loss to all of us and our condolences go out to Pat. It is understandable that she is not with us this evening; I believe the funeral was today. I will move on to a presentation that I am pleased to make this evening. It is to a person who has been with the Sanitation Districts for 25 years. It is with pleasure this evening that I present to Gary Streed, who had started with the Sanitation Districts as an Accountant in September 1967 and in August of 1981 he was promoted to Accounting Supervisor. In September 1984 Gary was appointed Chief Administrative Assistant to the General Manager. In October 1989 Gary was appointed to his current position of Director of Finance. Gary is in charge of all Accounting and Financial Activities, Purchasing and Warehousing and Management Information Services. It is with a great deal of happiness that I am going to present him with a pin, commemorating his 25 years of service. It is like the ones that we all wear but it has a 25 year on the bottom. I must say it shines much better than ours do. GGS: Over the past 25 years I have learned one thing and that is not very much gets done by just me. I would like to take this chance to thank my staff and the other department heads and, especially the Directors and General Manager for your support. I look forward to another 25 years. JC: Upcoming Meetings - Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 are scheduled to _ adjourn to next Wednesday evening, September 16th at 7:30 p.m. That is for the purpose to consider their user fees for 1992-93. Please calendar that for next Wednesday evening for 7:30 p.m. The Executive Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, September 23rd at 5:30 p.m. The Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee is scheduled to meet on Tuesday, September 29th at 5:30 p.m. #6(b) - Report of the General Manager JWS: I have no special report this evening, Mr. Chairman. Staff will be reporting on several agenda items later in the evening. I would like to ask Mr. Streed to just brief you on the sale of our Series C Certificates of Participation which took place early last week. GGS: In your packet tonight, there is a pricing book that summarizes the events leading up to and including the sale of the $98.5 million of certificates. The sale was held last week and was very successful. All of the certificates were sold by 8:00 in the morning. They were snapped up pretty fast. There was quite a bit of activity in the market, including some issues of various denominations. The initial interest rate was 2.7T, that is reset daily and during the last week it hasn't exceeded 3.0% despite the large supply. We continue to monitor that and we are very pleased with the results. -1- The certificates were rated AAA by both rating agencies because of the insurance and provisions by The underlying ratings were AA and AA- just for the Districts ourselves so very good ratings, very good price, very good results. Out of $98.5 million, a little over $97.0 million was put in the bank, including 9.0% for reserves. That would conclude my report unless there are questions. #9 - Consent Calendar JC: We will move on to the Consent Calendar, Items No. 9 (a) - (j). Director Roth: I would like the record to show that I abstain on Item No. 9(j). Director Collins: I would like to pull Items 9(c)(d)(e)(f). Director Stanton: I have asked the Clerk of the Board to report an abstention on Item No. 9(j). JC: Staff has requested that Item No. 9(g) be removed. The balance of the items, we have a motion and a second. Is there any further discussion or opposition? Seeing none, they will be deemed approved. Let us move to Item Nos. 9(c)(d)(e)(f). Director Collins: If you remember last month, there is an overall concern that a Design Engineer can do some sloppy work and get away with it while the Districts are paying increased costs due to the Engineer's ineffectiveness. Each of the contracts we are going to discuss are over the original contract amounts. Part of the reasons they are over is because the Design Engineer omitted items from the contract drawings that I believe is due to negligence. Equipment, parts and labor which almost always cost more when priced as "add-ons" and are not included in the original contract bid. By pulling these items and making the recommendations that I am going to make, I hope to focus staff's attention and through them the Consulting Engineer's awareness that this Board is going to be very critical of engineering design errors and omissions. Moving to Item No. 9(c), it sites design errors for IlUMS-1,`3.,.7-, 10, 11, 12, �r This is the staff's report. It says that "cost recovery will be negotiated with the consultant". This contract is 14.2% over original contract amount. I would like to move acceptance of Item 9(c) with the following additions: I WrV0ft�AM; J1�� 5r, 4, s b� .to i em5 , . ; &t9d regard ig :cos16 d very nego 'i tior�.S with Carrs;ulting >rng'indering flan. I would like a,repo -t"w 'g,[IM to the Fiscal Policy Committee regarding the outcome of said negotiations with consultant. Director Stanton: I think the report should be available to all the Directors. Director Collins: That's fine with me, Roger. JC: The report can go to all Directors. (Deemed approved as amended.) Director Collins: Item No. 9(d) - It sites Items 1 through 4 "would have been included in original design if discovered or known". This contract is 3.3% over the original contract amount. -2- I believe there was sufficient information at the time the that the Consulting Engineers put together the design drawings and the items were omitted from the contract documents because of "sloppy work". I would like to move Item No. 9(d) with the following additions: Items 1- through 4 be added to Item 5 regarding cost recovery negotiations with thef Consulting Engineer, as well as a report be given to the Fiscal policy Committee -.- regarding outcome of said negotiations with the Consultant. JC: Can we assume that the report will be given to the Directors rather than just the Fiscal Policy Committee? Director Collins: That is fine with me. JC: If that can be your motion. (Approved as amended) Director Collins: Item No. 9(e) sites two items of additional work and states they would have been included if discovered or known. This contract is 2.3% over the original contract amount. I believe the location of HVAC equipment and a parapet wall were significant enough to be known at the time the Engineer did their drawings. I would like to move Item 9(e) with the following additions: First, wftI-a;te!,� cost recovery with Consulting Engineer for Items 1 and 2. Second, that a report be given to the Board regarding the outcome of said negotiations with the Consultant. JC: (Deemed approved as amended) Director Collins: Item No. 9(f) sites that we would look for "reimbursement" fox items 2, 3 and 6-because Of "design errors". I believe Item 5 should be added to this list. This contract is 1.2% over the original contract amount. I would like to move Item 9(f) with the following additions: First, nerve cast recovery for Items 2, 3, 5 and 6 from Design Engineer as well as do a? .re:po'rt that will be given to the Board regarding the outcome of said negotiations with the Consultant. Director Laszlo: It says that this is a $9.4 million project and we are talking about a $17,000 Change Order? TMD: The whole project cost is $9.4 million net and this is a $17,000 Change Order. Director Laszlo: Because the Engineering Department left out this? Is that what we're saying? TMD: There were some errors and omissions in the plans which resulted in these changes being added. Director Laszlo: Isn't this standard? TMD: Pretty standard, yes. -3- Director Laszlo: So what are we hassling about? Director Collins: I'll address that. I disagree; I don't think think it is pretty standard. Some of these items are just flat out errors by the engineer. We hire an engineer to it for us and we take those drawings to a contractor and he bids on them. If the engineer does not do a good job and the contractor has to come back and charge us some add-ons later on, we, the District have to pay for them. I find an exceptional high number of errors here by staff's own commitments of this, of just being omitted. If we read between the lines, it's gross negligence. This is one way of saving money. TMD: When I said it is kind of standard on big jobs like this, it is a job where we're retrofitting existing facilities. This particular one is working in older facilities and replacing old engines with new motors and drives as a part of our electrification requirements. There is always a number of these types of errors that creep into the plans. I don't mean to minimize them but saying that they are standard. They happen on every job and as Director Collins pointed out, these four jobs all have some of the same types of errors. They were omissions from the design plans and specifications and in that regard they are standard. They were all omissions. Director Sheridan: ---- contigency in the overall budget for these sorts of things that there is an "X" number of percent that is excusable for------- TMD: We have adequate budget but we don't plan for change orders. We know there are going to be things by our history that will creep into plans and specs. We don't plan that we are going to get "X" percent of errors. On our jobs as Director Collins and I discussed, some of these jobs have 300 to 400 sheets of drawings on them. In some cases there just ---- between them. It's something we work as hard as we can with our consultants and they try to improve the quality control of the plans. There are always changes like this. Staff is perfectly happy to make these reports to you and show you these things. Director Sansone: I just wanted to support Director Collins. I personally experienced this on the Bayside Drive project. The prime contractor got my ear and pointed out that there were some inconsistencies in the specifications and he said they should have never occurred. I know some things can slip but ------ I think that it is almost impossible for a consultant engineer to come up without some changes and maybe we can alert these people that we are aware. Director Main: I guess when it is an error of the consulting engineer or whoever did the plans, that the staff does try to negotiate with them to get some rebate. TMD: We do and we get money back. We don't recover full cost; we try to recover costs that we estimate is that extra incurred by the District. For instance, if the change means that we built something and then we have to tear something down because it was wrong (and that happens between mechanical sheets, architectural sheets or the structural sheets or something doesn't get right) we recover full for those types of errors. If it is an omission of something which means it doesn't get replaced we try to estimate what the added cost to the District is. That would be the cost that you don't do as well in the change order as you would in the original bid. If you have ten light fixtures and nine are included in the bid and you have to pay a change order for the tenth one, the tenth one probably costs more than each of the other nine would. We try to get that difference. -4- Director Stanton: I support Director Collins and commend him for his diligence on this. I would certainly agree with him as for as the message that he is sending. ------------- It shouldn't be standard and I think we should perk up on these things. JC: (Deemed approved as amended) *�" #11 Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee JC: What we are going to be doing is starting the process for fee increases as a result of the money "grab" by the State. This is the beginning of the process in these particular Districts to increase user fees. Director Roth: ----- JC: As I understand it, this evening is the first reading of the ordinances. TLW: This is just the introduction of the ordinance and with the adjournment of the meetings for the seven districts to next week. Consideration and the hearing on the proposed ordinance will be held at that time. Director Main: I would like to move that this be put on the agenda after we have the meeting on the 16th so some of us Directors that haven't been here all that many years find out what's going on. I think the fees are plenty as is and I would like to find out more about it. This looks like an awful lot. JC: We have a motion and a second. We now have a new motion and a second. Is that correct? We have a main motion; it's not a substitute motion. Therefore, we will take the main motion unless we have a substitute motion. Director Collins: Perhaps it would be beneficial if there was some discussion from the Fiscal Policy Committee explaining why it is important on a timing basis to have tonight setting the hearing and the 16th meeting and October 1st meeting, and if we miss these dates, what are the ramifications? JC: We can have a report from staff in regards to why the procedure has started this evening as it is and the purpose for each of the hearings that are set out in the material this evening. TLW: Wayne wants to explain what has been developing with the Fiscal Policy Committee and what the staff and my office has been working on. Procedurally, the reasoning for setting it tonight was when the State legislature last week enacted ---- 844 which was the tax shift proposal which is the compromise budget program, it called the take away of 35% (to simplify this) from the special districts Ad Valorem tax revenues. Part of that bill provided that the districts that collect their taxes on the tax roll (as we do and historically have done for many years) have until October 1st to get that data to the Auditor. Previously, we had until August loth but obviously that date kept slipping. They extended it to Auguste t (?). The Finance Department has to prepare the computer tapes whic� es about a week and then get it to the Auditor b October 1st. L The scheduling was to have it introduced at this meeting, have it considered at a hearing to either approve it or disapprove it on the merits next week on the 16th. If approved, the ordinance will be effective as of October 15th. That the fees to commence October 15th but that will allow about 14 days for the -5- staff to get the contract to prepare the computer tapes and get them to the Auditor and meet the October 1st deadline. If we don't make that deadline, 1992-1993 fiscal year is history. We will not be able to get the raises enacted and collect it on the tax roll. We do have ordinances in effect. The existing ordinance was adopted in June and effective July 1st with the rate that is presently in effect. The staff report notes the incremental increase. Director Stanton: Do we know whether it's going to be 35% or 40%? JWS: No, we don't know and probably won't know for several months. What the bill provides is that special districts will contribute or shift 35% of their property tax revenues with a few exceptions that we will discuss however, if the state-wide target of $375.0 million is not satisfied by that 35%, then the County Auditors have the discretion to increase it up to another 5% for a total of 40%, also subject to the 10% cap. We won't know until the County Auditor calculates that. We've been told that that won't be until later in the fall, once they have made the calculations for all the special districts that are effected. Again in summary, as Tom mentioned, the budget bill provides for the transfer of between 35% to 40°%. Based upon the current year budget, 35% would be just under $12.0 million for the seven districts affected. 40% tax loss would be $13.7 million. There is a provision in the budget that caps the amount that any special district would lose at 10% of their ----- (tape ended). ----. We've been able to defeat that so far each time that that has come up so there is a little good news in this state budget action. As Tom mentioned, we collect our user fees on the tax bill because that is the most cost effective way to do it. The reason that the proposal to introduce the ordinance before you is summarized on page 5 of the committee's report which sets forth the time table. Most of those dates Tom commented on. If it's the Boards desire to adjust the user fees to make up for this loss of property tax revenue, it could be done by the extended due date for filing that information with the County Auditor of October 1st, in accordance with the schedule that is before you on page 5 which provides for introduction of the ordinance and first reading this evening. The report also points out that the committee discussed the alternatives that the Board has to address the loss of revenue from the property taxes. They break down into four categories and there is more detailed staff reports in your package. The committee's discussion is summarized in the green report. One option is the issuance of short-term notes. Many of your agencies (on an annual basis because of the cash -flow of the property taxes) have to borrow on the short-term under what is commonly called the tax revenue anticipation notes or TRAN to get them through that period. Many of you can arbitrage and actually make money on that. You may recall the Boards discussed this several months ago and because of our reserve position, bond counsel ruled that we could not do short-term borrowing. Bond counsel has now ruled that because of the unique situation caused by the State's action in confiscating our taxes, that the Boards could in fact do short-term borrowing of taxable notes and in fact arbitrage and come out with the net earnings. The committee discussed this at great length and the consensus is that inasmuch as there is a very strong likelihood that next year and the following years the State will be after what they didn't get this year from special districts. In fact, there is a letter from Senator Marian Bergeson in your package. We think, as you all know, ---- Senate local government committee that in essense says they will be back at least for enterprise districts for the rest of our tax monies next year and thereafter until they get it all. The committee was concerned that by short-term borrowing we were just putting off the inevitable because next year would be back with a similar situation and the fees would have to be raised by a greater amount which would be that more difficult to explain. Use of existing reserves is another option that the committee discussed. There was concern about that because that would exacerbate our net revenue situation because we would not only lose property taxes but lose the interest that we earn on the reserves that we now have. Those, as you recall, are structured in accordance with long-term financial strategy that the Board has adopted as a result of our Master Plan. Another issue there is, you've heard reports from staff and the Fiscal Policy Committee over the last several months about the favorable reputation and rating that we have in the bond market. Lastly in the type of business that we are in we can have major emergencies occur at any time that are considerably expensive to take corrective action on and of course the reserve position that the Boards have takes that into consideration and that is why it's been established where they are. The committee also discussed for quite some time the potential of further future budgetary cuts. I think it's fair to say and the committee members can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the consensus of the committee is that they have taken this into consideration early in the budget process because we already knew there were state-wide proposals to raid our property taxes. We were also very sensitive to the fact of the status of the economy is very poor. Taking all those things into considertion you recall that the budget was in fact cut $54.2 million for 1992-93 under what the 1991-92 budget was. In spite of our costs continue to rise to comply with increasingly regulatory requirements. There are some additional budgetary cuts that could be made. We discussed some of those with the committee. We don't, as you know, in this business have alot of discretionary expenditures. All of our money goes toward keeping the treatment plants operating and meeting the standards imposed upon us. We could cut back in such areas as research, regulatory and legislative monitoring and activities and so forth. The committee discussed that at great lengths as well. The committee decided given all of those considerations that the best alternative was to adjust the user fees for this year to make up for that property tax loss. There are several pieces of information that we don't fully have yet that could affect those fees. The fees that you have and are shown on the last page of the Fiscal Policy Committee report would be those fees/adjustments that are required to make up for the 35% tax loss based upon the 1992-93 budget that the Boards adopted. There are several issues that we are obtaining clarification on the State budget act and attempting to get the most current information from the County on in terms of the tax base that will be used to calculate the tax shift, how the 10% cap may apply and the other provision that we've discussed with you in the past. -7- In fact the Board took an action several months ago is the provision in the budget act that allows for exemption from property tax shift; those monies that are dedicated to debt service. Staff and Counsel believe that we qualify under that exemption and we are putting together our position on that to hopefully get concurrence from the County Auditor. All of those would have the effect of reducing the amount shown on the committee's report that's required to make up for the tax loss. Preliminary information that we have indicate that the tax cap will probably apply in all districts but one. If, in fact we get a favdrable ruling on the exemption for tax revenues dedicated to debt service that that would further reduce the fees. The committee's recommendation is that you introduce the ordinance tonight to adjust the fees for the reasons that they have enumerated in their report with the understanding that once more definitive information is received, that the Board will have the option at the second reading. That reading is tentatively scheduled for a week from tonight to reduce those fees if the information indicates that that could be done without jeopardizing the revenue status. Mr. Chairman, I think that summarizes staff's understanding of the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation. Director Stanton: I understand what you're saying about the calendar but are you saying this is an affirmative vote to increase (to vote for it) and not a matter of introducing it as originally asked, it's a matter of voting in favor of it? JC: I think that the way it would work is it's the first reading. When the second reading comes you could actually vote it down. This only starts the process that is required so that we can go into the actual implementation of this ordinance. TLW: It's the first reading, it's scheduled for hearing, and a vote to adopt if you continue this meeting to next Wednesday night. This is an analogous to seconding for purposes of discussion. This is an introduction; it doesn't mean that anyone that votes to introduce is bound to vote "yes" to adopt it. Director Stanton: I understand that you can change your vote on the second time but the fact is the first vote is an affirmative vote to raise the fees. TLW: I guess literal interpretation of the words would be "yes" if you vote to introduce it, you're voting "yes" for a document that increases the fees. JC: Maybe a better way to say it is if you don't vote for it, you cannot increase the fees. If you don't vote for this, you cannot increase the fees. Director Stanton: I understand that and I respect that. I am in a state of great uncertainty whether I want to support this. Director Swan: With all due respect, Roger, I think that when the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee reviewed the budget they spent alot of time on it. One thing that was discussed here is that we hold the line on the budget this year. One of the components in that budget was that we were going to get the Central Generation on line and that was going to provide sort of a ---- for revenue. Now, we're not going to get Central Gen on line so we're already starting out a couple of million dollars behind on budget. We started off M holding the line; we're taking a considerable hit this year anyway and this is an essential public service and it ought to be protected. Second of all, when they come through and cut the next --- next year, which is probably true, the shock going through to the people .... Director Stanton: ----. You're arguing on the foundation that we make up that revenue. Director Swan: But even if you take 25% of it off, forego and don't do anything this and then next year you try to go up 75% it will be double shock. --------- I think that the feeling was that the people right now understand what the legislature does. They passed a tax increase through us to them. I think that if you pass it on through and explain it as to what you did and put into a public relations campaign that is going to explain what is going on here, they'll understand where the anger ought to be focused on. The principal thing is that we spent alot of time on the budget and we already cut that back to hold the line budget this year. Now you've done --- this year; we already know that we're $2 million short. I think that it's quite important; it wasn't ---- decided by the Fiscal Policy Committee. Director Sheridan: I guess I have to take issue with Supervisor Stanton. I also want to compliment the scope of your report and also the work of the Fiscal Policy Committee. We've been riding this horrible mess for almost three months watching ------ I concur with the Fiscal Policy Committee and move the question at this time. JC: We need to take this District at a time so for right now... Director Stanton: I'm not taking issue with the report. I think we have our individual discretion as whether we vote for it or against it. Director Griffin: I won't repeat what the General Manager and the other staff commented on. I think that there are several other issues. Having sat on the Fiscal Policy Committee, I appreciate the input both from staff and peers. The issues prompted us to recommend to the Joint Boards that we cut the budget 10% this year which was on the basis that we not raise our user fees. We did that in good conscience to our constituents. Now we're faced with the other culprit, the guys up north, and I think they need to take the heat if in fact that's ------ We're responsible to let the citizens know why this is happening. I would ----- make the motion this evening and it didn't come easy for me to make that motion but I think I reserve judgement on this as well. It needs to be done tonight so that next week we can hear from the public and make a final decision. One other thing I think is particularly note -worthy is to what degree this Joint Board is willing to meet its responsibility with regard to the health and safety issues as well as the environmental issues that surround us. We're faced with mandates from "big brother", from water quality to air quality, up and down the ladder and who's paying the price. If someone doesn't stop it, we're going to have to continue to these types of things. We're getting hit from all directions. I think we owe it to our constituents to remember that if we don't maintain the quality of effluent and discharge, then we could stand to lose alot more money by going through full treatment at this plant. I think that is a major gamble and I think it should be taken seriously. S•12 Director Collins: Speaking politically, none of us elected officials want to raise taxes. By the way, this is one of the finest reports given to us (about ten pages). It has answered everyone of my questions and answered them before I asked them, because some of my questions I had were in here, and I thought it was an excellent job. It considered the bonds, the reserves, considered reducing operational budgets. None of those to me, at this moment are what we should be doing. Timing is a very important issue; not just the sequence of events that takes us to October 1st but timing is important because we should not lose the moment of who is to blame here. The blame is not here, it is up in Sacramento. If we take ---- at a later date',' we will lose that moment and the blame may rest here. If we take it on now and pass it on through fast and point to Sacramento when we're asked what is going on, we're passing it through and talk those people. We really have no choice in this matter. I am very applauding to the report. Director Main: Comments about Marian Bergeson's letter. Her letter tells me that she doesn't know what she is talking about when it comes to funds due to enterprise districts. I think we ought to put forth a real effort, all of us, to write her, call her, inform her that that is not so. I don't know what Districts did get extra money; I'd like to know, maybe we could go tap the same source. JC: I will only say in regards to that, that I know we have been communicating quite diligently with all of our representatives in Orange County and she is aware of the fact that this organization did not receive that in those funds. We're just in the pot with everyone else and we're going to get hit like everyone else. I don't think there was alot of concern. Director Laszlo: I'm just trying to figure this out. First of all, we're charging $60.00 a year. Next column says $17.50 and then there is a $57.04 and then there is a $14.54 and then by 1992-93 there is $74.54. Is that correct? JC: Yes, actually you're figures are going to come out. If you'll look at the third column where it's $74.54, the way you would come up with that is take the current 1992-93 user fee on the left, add the fourth column which is $14.54 which is the actual increase and you're going to be at a $74.54 for that District. What we're talking about in the second and third columns is the proration of the increase of the increase between July 1st through October 15th and then from October 16th through June 30th next year. If you add the first and the fourth and the second and the third, they both come out to $74.54. The fourth column is really the one you want to look at. That's the increase per District. Director Stanton: I think what would make all of us more comfortable is if this timing wasn't in place. I want to get a definitive answer from Mr. Woodruff saying that there is no other way that this calendar will work in terms that this first vote will not a public hearing. I would be alot more comfortable. I was very moved by Mr. Collins argument more so than anyone else's. He got the message across very very clearly. It still bothers me that we're not getting a hearing now when we're taking the first -------- Is there anything else you could do? TLW: There may be a handful of days get the computer tape prepared to the the 16th and had the meeting and met the following Wednesday, is the last line of not making the deadline of a we can play with in this month and still County Auditor, etc. If you met again on again on the 17th or 18th, maybe as late as conceivably, that's approaching the risky computer breaking down. -10- Director Stanton: I am trying to get an answer. Let's get real with the money you're talking about. So as far as logistics are concerned, this is it? TLW: Realistically, there may be two or three days that it could slide. You would have to reconvene 17th, 18th and the 21st. Director Stanton: I am very concerned about this. I reserve the right looking at it only as an introduction of this; reserving the right to not going forward JC: You have that right. Director Sansone: The schedule is set to put in on the current tax bill. When you get it on the current tax bill, they're going to take a look at last year's tax bill and they're going to say Orange County Sanitation District has gone up $75.00 or whatever. I wonder how much is it going to cost us to have a supplemental bill? That's what's going to happen if we don't get it in on time. They then would have to send out a supplemental bill and on that supplemental bill, couldn't we then say on there "passed through State so and so" so the public will know that it's not the Sanitation District but it's the whole state? GGS: Last year that happened to one District in Irvine. The combination of errors; the billing did not get put on the proper tax bill, not through the fault of the agency. The County did send out a supplemental bill for that particular area. They told me in no uncertain terms they would never do that again. There is a considerable number of problems that occur when there are two property tax bills for --- Nothing in the world is set up to expect more than one property tax bill; title searches, real estate transactions, any number of things follow it. The County said they would not under any circumstances. JC: Roger, the only thing I can say in response to the shortness of the time is I talked with Wayne and in consultation with General Counsel, the reason that we reconvened the Fiscal Policy Committee last week was because, as you recall, we were continuing Board meetings recognizing that the passage of the budget was imminent. We wanted to act as soon as that budget was passed by convening the Board and doing those things that were necessary to increase user fees if in fact that's what we wanted to do. We have known since the last Board meeting that this was going to happen and that we were going to convene. We didn't have the particulars because at that time we didn't know how much of the money was going to be taken from us. We now have the figures and we're now moving for those Districts that wish to do so into a mode by review by the Fiscal Policy Committee the recommendation of the best way to go is the user fee. John's argument was very well made the night of the Fiscal Policy Committee meeting. That is, that we're going to take the bullet eventually. I think as a District we have been very responsible in trying to hold user fees to a minimum and meet our commitments. I think this Board and previous Boards have made commitments to the environment and to those people in Orange County that we will provide the highest quality of service for the least amoDnt of cost. We do that and I think the argument this evening is that it's time for us to begin to tell people who's doing all this stuff to them. I'm going to tell you, I hope there is a way that we can do that. We've talked about it and tried to strategize at the Fiscal Policy Committee. How can we get the message out to the people. If we could do that, we've won the battle. We have won the battle if we can convince the voter that this all happened as a result of Sacramento and maybe the change in Sacramento will stop this from happening next year. We don't know. We sit here as a responsible agency. We do what we can and we knew this hit was coming. Everyone of us knew we were going to get hit and we all waited until it -11- happened and now we're going to have to deal with it. We can deal with it by using our reserves, we can do it through the sale of notes, we can put it off, we can ignore it but sooner or later we're going to be in trouble and we're not going to meet our commitments. This evening each District is going to be asked by District. First off, I would like a motion to receive and file .... (Tape Ended) �-- I'm not going to even talk about it, John. It's gone. I've got to be certain that that motion was from District 1. From now on, all these motions, seconds and actions will be by District. The motion that was made was to move, if I'm not mistaken, 11(a)(b)(c). There is no action on (b) and (c). Item #11 has been moved and approved. Now we will move to 11(c) and we are going to go district by district. The first one will be District 1. I need a motion and a second. This is for the first reading. Alright, we have a motion and a second. Is there any discussion? Is there any opposition? Seeing none, it is deemed approved. District 2, we have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Director Main: This motion is to go ahead with the hearing? I oppose. JC: You are in District 2. Now we have a motion and a second. Any more discussion? I guess I'm assuming that these are for the three parts (a)(b)&(c), the CEQA and the other matters, in these motions? Alright, we have in District 2 a motion and a second. Any more discussion? Is there opposition? Alright, one opposition. Alright it's approved. TLW: If I could, on District 2 the second part of that motion is to waive the reading of the ordinance in full and by title only. That must be passed by unanimous vote. If not, we will have to read the ordinance in full. Director Main: I'll go along with that. JC: You're objecting to (a) and (c)? It will be deemed approved; (b) is approved by unanimous consent, (a) and (c) are approved by majority. (Director Main opposed (a) & (c).) District 3, we have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Any opposition? To what parts? We have a unanimous consent to item (b) and a majority to (a) and (c). (Director Culver and Director Silva opposed (a) & (c).) District 5, we have a motion and a second. Is there any discussion? Is there any opposition? Alright, (b) is approved by unanimous consent, (a) and (c) by majority. (Director Roth opposed (a) & (c).) District 6, we had a motion and a second. Any discussion? Is there opposition? Alright, we have then unanimous on (b) and majority on (a) and (c). (Director Roth opposed (a) & (c).) District 7, we have a motion and a second. Discussion? opposition? Again, an unanimous on (b) and majority on (a) and (c). (Director Roth opposed (a) & (c).) District 11, we have a motion and a second. Is there any discussion? Is there any opposition? Those all three will be deemed approved by unanimous consent. -12- #11(d) - Develop and implement a public information program JC: This for the purposes of telling the people who is responsible for this. VJC: Before we finalize the PR campaign, Mr. Sansone ask a question. What would it cost to separate the tax bill. I wonder if we have the cost figures on what it would cost to notify everyone by mail that gets a tax bill? JWS: Just for postage. Director Swan:------- JC: I think that really putting together the information program will take into consideration all of these things in trying to evaluate which is the best way to get to the public and try to tell them and certainly those factors would be included. What we will probably do is have staff put together some proposals and give it to the Fiscal Policy Committee to review and make recommendation on and bring it back to the Board. Director Kelly: The opportunity for developing a public information program might allow us to consider a televising of the open meeting on the 16th. We do have access channels which would be of value to us. I am certain that testimonies such as Director Collins and Supervisor Stanton and all sides will be represented on and should maybe considered by this panel. Director Laszlo: I was just going to ask if you have a contingency plan for the parking lot? Director Richardson: There needs to be some thorough thinking as to what is communicated to the public. --------. JC: The thought is that basically the increase is not actually going to be seen by the public for some time so we do have some time to begin educating the public of why this is coming. Again how we do that is the consideration here. Is it a mailer, is it something we can put in the tax bill or what is it going to be. Is going to be in the newspaper, will it be television, will it be a combination of all these things. I think that anyone of the mediums you use, you're limited in the coverage that you get. It isn't that if we pass this, the intent is not to try to have the people unless Director Kelly brought up, be able to see the actual action if you sit here and debate this. It's basically if in fact it's approved, having some methodology that can go to the public and tell them why it is coming. It certainly isn't with our blessing that it is happening. That is really what we are doing here and when we talked about 30 days it was if we have a recommendations made to the Fiscal Policy Committee, they can review it and refer back to us. Director Richardson: I would like to register a real strong concern that the contingency plan to the campaign will be ready to go next week because I can guarantee that once word starts to filter out regardless as to who is forcing us to take whatever action, the people are going to want to know so all the Directors need to have some information to be able to respond to that immediately. I think that needs to happen alot sooner than 30 days from now. -13- JC: We will be armed with information as to why this is going on so if people come to us, we will have this information. I'm not concerned about a constituent coming to me and me being able to justify why it happened. It's the people that don't come to us, read the bill and get ticked off at the Sanitation Districts because we're jabbing them. Director Griset: This proposal I presume is that the program will be implemented? JC: Yes Director Swan: I just wanted to point out that most of the Districts, we're talking it's about $12 - $13 a year difference on the tax bill. We're not talking about hundreds of dollars. Director Richardson: Peer, it doesn't matter. It's big money to senior citizens; that argument is not going to wash. Director Main: Do I understand that this is just on the single family residences? JC: On the very last page in the supporting documents is a break-out of the single, multiple and commercial. Director Stanton: With regards to the words being used, PR I don't think is appropriate. Information is information. Educate the public is something I take offense to. I disassociate myself for using those words. We're assuming that it is going to pass and that is exactly why I am against the vote tonight because I don't think we ought to assume. I want to hear what is going to be said at that hearing. It doesn't matter if it is U or $2 or $20, it just doesn't matter. JC: I understand, Roger. Thank you for your correction of our terminology. An educator can always help us in regards as to how we should be saying things. I must say "thank you" for the indulgence in this; it isn't an easy matter for any of us and none of us like to go to our people and tell them that they are going to have to pay more money but we have at least started the process. We will meet next week and either continue it or kill it, whichever way it may go but I think the discussion has been very healthy and helpful and hopefully next week we'll be able to do those things that are in the best interest of our people. CLOSED SESSION -14- COUNTY SANITATION Q DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 �1 OF a ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 9, 1992 �tt1TATIp�, �/ 5 tapplitatt p Sfoce 195A NNGE Cps/ ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES � 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA u ROLL CALL �f \,U011 A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on September 9, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Dan Griset, Chairman Robert Richardson x Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tem Gene Beyer x Thomas R. Saltarelli Leslie A. Pontious _L _Roger Stanton Don R. Roth x James A. Wahner James Ferryman DISTRICT NO. 2: x Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman John M. Gullixson x John Collins, Chairman pro tem George Scott x Fred Barrera Gene Beyer a Buck Catlin Chris Norby x Barry Denes Bob Bell x William D. Mahoney James H. Flora x Robert H. Main Norman Culver x Carrey J. Nelson Glenn Parker a Arthur G. Newton John 0. Tynes x Iry Pickler Fred Hunter x Miguel Pulido Dan Griset x Roger Stanton Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: DISTRICT NO. 5: DISTRICT NO. 6: x Sal A. Sapien, x Burnie Dunlap, a Buck Catlin x John Collins x Norman Culver a James V. Evans x James H. Flora x Don R. Griffin x Frank Laszlo Pat McGuigan x Eva G. Miner x Richard Partin x Iry Pickler x Jim Silva x Roger Stanton x Charles Sylvia Chairman Chairman pro tem x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman x Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tem x Don R. Roth x James A. Wahner, Chairman -7—Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tern x Don R. Roth Harry M. Dotson Carrey J. Nelson Chris Norby George Scott Robert H. Main Margie L. Rice William D. Mahoney Rhonda J. McCune Gwen A. Forsythe x Robert Richardson Larry Herman Cecilia L. Age Fred Hunter Earle Robitaille Don R. Roth Ronald Bates Evelyn Hart John C. Cox, Jr. Roger Stanton Dick Sherrick Ruthelyn Plummer Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Thomas R. Saltarelli x James A. Wahner, Chairman pro tem Nate Reade x Fred Barrera Gene Beyer x John C. Cox, Jr. Ruthelyn Plummer x Robert Richardson Miguel Pulido x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton x Sally Anne Sheridan Barry Hammond DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman Linda Moulton -Patterson x Jack Kelly, Chairman pro tem Don MacAllister x Roger Stanton Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x John M. Gullixson, Chairman Henry W. Wedaa -x-Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tem Gene Beyer Glenn Parker x Burnie Dunlap x Iry Pickler Fred Hunter x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller x Leslie A. Pontious, Chairman pro tern Charles E. Puckett x Fred Barrera Gene Beyer x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton x Sally Anne Sheridan Barry Hammond -2- 09/09/92 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Corrine Clawson, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, John Linder, Margie Nellor, Bob Ooten, Mary Simpson, Chuck Winsor Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Mary Lee, Rayeke Mazarei, Dick Sherrick, Phil Stone, Richard von Langen ************* DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpt re Board Appointments That the minute excerpt from the City of Anaheim re appointment of alternate Director, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) Active Director Alternate Director Iry Pickler Fred Hunter* ALL DISTRICTS Chairman Mahoney recognized Gary G. Presentation of service pin to Streed, Director of Finance,,for District employee Gary G. Streed 25 years of outstanding service to the Districts. Gary heads up the Districts' Finance Department and is responsible for all accounting and financial activities, as well as the Purchasing and Warehouse Division and the Management Information Services Division. He then presented Mr. Streed with a 25-year service pin. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Mahoney regretfully Report of the Joint Chairman announced that Jim McGuigan, husband of Director Pat McGuigan and long-time Orange County attorney, had passed away. Chairman Mahoney then extended the Directors' and staff's condolences to Director McGuigan. Chairman Mahoney then announced that Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 would be adjourning to Wednesday, September 16, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. to consider possible action to adjust Districts sewer service user fees for 1992-93 in response to the State's confiscation of Districts' property taxes. He also reported that the Executive Committee was scheduled to meet on Wednesday, September 23rd, at 5:30 p.m. He further stated that the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee was scheduled to meet on Tuesday, September 29th, at 5:30 p.m. -3- it 09/09/92 ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager requested that a Report of the General Manager brief status report be given to the Directors by the Director of Finance �r...� regarding the sale of the Series C Certificates of Participation (COP) which recently took place. Mr. Streed referred the Directors to a booklet included in their meeting folders that evening which summarized the sale of the Series C $98.5 million variable rate COPs. He reported the market was active the day of the sale with all COPs sold by 8:00 a-.m. The initial interest rate was 2.7%, which is reset daily. Despite the large supply of bonds on the market, the interest rate had not exceeded 3.0% and staff was continuing to monitor the rates. M H h He further reported that the COPs were rated AAA and Aaa by the rating agencies because of the insurance provisions. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 12, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 2 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 12, 1992, be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 3 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 12, 1992, be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 5 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes DISTRICT 6 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes DISTRICT 7 Approval of Minutes the Chairman ordered that said minutes There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 12, 1992, be deemed approved, as mailed. There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 12, 1992, be deemed approved, as mailed. There being no corrections or amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 12, 1992, be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 09/09/92 DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 12, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 12, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held August 12, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Joint Working Capital Fund Self -Funded Insurance Funds DISTRICT NO. 1 DISTRICT NO. 2 DISTRICT NO. 3 DISTRICT NO. 5 DISTRICT NO. 6 DISTRICT NO. 7 DISTRICT NO. 11 DISTRICT NO. 13 DISTRICT NO. 14 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT 8/12/92 - $1,003,566.85 - 2,815,662.45 - 145,981.49 -0- - 595.00 - 15,165.99 - 24,773.87 - 15,583.92 -0- - 1,885,011.37 6,691.01 -0- 6,952.04 203.65 3,813.12 - 170.39 5, 24,171.15 -5- 8/26/92 $ 826,685.01 2,679,507.83 157,907.44 101,023.30 46,763.65 178,105.11 27,888.33 165,259.88 26.69 14,984.20 677.18 -0- 430,455.85 3,838.74 -0- 5,430.74 4,638,553.95 P-s . PP 09/09/92 ALL DISTRICTS Awarding Microcomputer Hardware, ,*.,.,,Software and Associated Peripherals, Specification No. E-219, to Golden Star Technology, Inc. u Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the bid tabulation and recommendation re award of purchase order contract for Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals, Specification No. E-219, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded to Golden Star Technology, Inc. for it systems, for a total amount not to exceed $55,853.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing staff to issue purchase order to Beckman Instruments, Inc. for Purchase of One Tabletop Optima TL Ultracentrifuge (Specification No. E-220 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Beckman Instruments, Inc. in the amount of $42,966.00 plus sales tax, for Purchase of One Tabletop Optima TL Ultracentrifuge (Specification No. E-220). ALL DISTRICTS Director John Collins expressed Actions re Change Orders for concern over the amount of and reasons Job Nos. J-17; J-1 -1; P1-34-3, for various items included on change P1-35-2 and J-21; and P2-42-1 orders on Job Nos. J-17; J-19-1; P1-34-3, P1-35-2 and J-21; and P2-42-1. He stated the Districts' cost for items added on are almost always higher than if included in the original bid amount. His intention, he concluded, was to focus staff's and consulting design engineers' attention and awareness that the Directors would be very critical of engineering design errors and omissions. A general discussion of the nature of change orders pertaining to large construction projects took place and the following actions were taken: Approving Change Order No. 12 to Director Collins requested that the plans and specifications for Item Nos. 5, 6, 8 and 9 be Job No. J-17 included with the other cost recovery Item Nos. 1, 3, 7, 10, 11, 12 and 13 for negotiation with the consultant with a follow-up report to the Directors on the outcome of said negotiations. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 12 to the plans and specifications for Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing an addition of $58,714.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for 15 items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 72 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. M 09/09/92 Approving Change Order No. 13 to the plans and specifications for Job No. J-19-1 design consultant with a follow-up outcome of said negotations. Director Collins requested that Item Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 be included with Item No. 5 for cost recovery negotiations with the report to the Directors on the It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order -No. 13 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $46,279.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for five items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Change Order No. 13 to Director Collins requested that the plans and specifications for Item Nos. 1 and 2 of Change Order Job Nos. P1-34-3, P1-35-2 and J-21 No. 13 be negotiated for cost recovery with the design consultant, with a follow-up report to the Directors on the outcome of said negotiations. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 13 to the plans and specifications for Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21, authorizing an addition of $15,957.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc., for two items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Change Order No. 5 to the Director Collins requested that plans and specifications for negotiations for Item No. 5 be Job No. P2-42-1 included with the other Items Nos. 2, 3 and 6 for cost recovery from the design engineer, with a follow-up report to the Directors on the outcome of said negotiations. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, authorizing an addition of $17,689.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper and C. S. Alper Construction Co., Inc., for six items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -7- 09/09/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement That the Boards of Directors hereby \r.,.,/with Boyle Engineering Corporation adopt Resolution No. 92-127, For preparation of Wastewater approving Addendum No. 1 to the Quality, Diversion and Treatment Professional Services Agreement with Study Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of Wastewater Quality, Diversion and Treatment Study, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $88,055.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Fiscal Policy That the written report of the Fiscal Committee Policy Committee's meeting held on received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 Actions re proposed ordinances amending ordinances increasing sanitary sewer service charges to replace Districts' property taxes confiscated by the State Verbal report of staff and General Counsel September 2, 1992, be, and is hereby, The General Counsel reported that, pursuant to the recommendations of the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committees the proposed ordinances to increase the Districts' 1992-93 sanitary sewer service charges to make up for Districts' property taxes confiscated by the State were being introduced for the first reading tonight. The Districts would then adjourn to Wednesday, September 16, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. to hold the second reading, a public hearing and then consider the ordinances for adoption. If adopted, the effective date would be October 16, 1992, 30 days following adoption. In response to Directors' questions regarding the scheduling for consideration of sewer service fee adjustment ordinances, Mr. Woodruff explained that the introduction of the ordinances at this meeting was needed because of certain provisions in the recently approved State budget. The budget includes a tax shift that generally calls for taking between 35% and 40%, not to exceed 10% of total revenue, from special districts' ad valorem tax revenue. Part of that bill provided that those special districts, such as the Sanitation Districts, that collect their annual sewer service fees on the tax roll have until October 1, 1992 to submit the necessary data to the Auditor's office for inclusion on the 1992-93 tax bill. If this deadline is not met, then the fees could not be adjusted and collected for the Districts for the 1992-93 fiscal year. Currently the Districts do have ordinances in effect to collect the old sewer service fees but the proposed increases are reflected in the new ordinances. Thus, the ordinance introduction and hearing must be completed essentially in accordance with the recommended schedule in order to meet the October 1st deadline. 1.2 09/09/92 In response to Directors' questions, the General Manager stated that the final impact of the State's budget is still unknown, and probably will not be known for several months because of certain provisions in the State's budget bill. He explained that the bill provides that 35% of special districts property tax revenues not to exceed 10% of their total revenue, will initially be shifted. However, if the state-wide target of $375.0 million is not satisfied by that 35% transfer, then the County Auditors have the discretion to increase the transfer up to another 5%, for a total of 40%, but still subject to a 10% cap. Thus, the final amount won't be known until the County Auditor calculates it. They have advised this will be done later in the fall once calculations have been made for all the special districts that are affected state-wide. Mr. Sylvester reiterated that the Districts collect user fees on the tax bill as the most cost effective way to do it. Thus, i.n order to meet the extended time limit of October 1, 1992 to supply data tapes to the County Auditor's office for the 1992-93 property tax roll, the increased fee consideration must follow the aforementioned time schedule included in the report of the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committees. He also pointed out that the Fiscal Policy Committee discussed at considerable length alternatives to address the loss of revenue from the property tax confiscation. One option was the issuance of short-term notes. Many member agencies, on an annual basis, because of the cash -flow of property tax receipts, have to borrow for the% short-term using what is commonly called tax revenue anticipation notes (TRANs) to get through the so-called dry period. Often net arbitrage earnings result. Several months ago the Districts discussed this alternative. However, because of our reserves position, our bond counsel ruled that the Districts could not do such short-term borrowing. Bond counsel has now ruled, however, that it is possible for the Districts to do short short-term borrowing using taxable notes because of the unique situation caused by the State's action in confiscating our taxes and, 'in fact, it is projected that we could also arbitrage and come out with net earnings. The Fiscal Policy Committee discussed this at great length and the consensus was that there is a very strong likelihood that next year and in the following years, the State will be after what remaining property taxes they didn't get this year from special districts. Mr. Sylvester also referred to a letter from Senator Marian Bergeson, Chair of the Senate Local Government Committee, that was included in the Directors' agenda packages. Her letter basically says that the State will be back, at least to the enterprise districts, for the rest of their tax monies next year, and each year thereafter until the State gets it all. Thus, the Fiscal Policy Committee was concerned that short-term borrowing would only be putting off the inevitable of increasing service fees by an even greater amount and it would be more difficult to explain. -9- 09/09/92 Another option discussed was the use of existing reserves. There was concern that this would exacerbate the Districts' net revenue situation ��..� because we would not only lose the property taxes confiscated by the State, but also lose the interest being earned on the reserves. Further, the current reserve structure is in accordance with the long term financial strategy that the Board has adopted as part of the Districts 30-year wastewater management plan. Another related issue concerns the possible negative impact that reducing reserves might have on the Districts' favorable reputation and rating in the bond market. Also of great concern is that in the wastewater business, major emergencies can occur at any time that are expensive to take corrective action on and the reserve levels established by the Boards take that into consideration. The Committee discussed at great length the matter of further budgetary cuts. It was pointed out that in putting together the 1992-93-budgets, the Committee recognized the current state of the economy and therefore sharpened the budget pencil and cut it by $54.2 million under the 1991-92 budget. This was accomplished in spite of the fact that Districts' costs of operation continue to rise because of the added costs of complying with regulatory requirements, both air quality and water quality, and costs associated with increasing sewerage flows resulting from ongoing development and population increases. Part of the costs associated with these two are, of course, the expenses necessary for operating and maintaining the approximately $100 million in new facilities that are placed into service each year. The impacts of inflation also affect our costs. It was noted that due to the probable delay in starting up central generation we anticipate running over the budget because we will not realize the full electrical cost savings anticipated with an earlier start-up. It was also noted that there are few discretionary expenditures in operating wastewater treatment facilities. Although some further operating budget cuts could be made, any meaningful reductions would impair our operating and maintenance capabilities for processing 230 million -gallons -per -day, and thus jeopardize our ability to keep the collection, treatment and disposal facilities in a state of repair that enables us to continuously comply with regulatory requirements and protect public health, the marine environment and the.beaches. Research and development is an example of what might be considered discretionary,.and there are some others. But, it was observed, Districts' research and development is directed towards the goals of finding better and more efficient ways of doing things, and assuring that the public's health and the environment are being adequately protected. The same can be said of such activities as our involvement in legislative and regulatory affairs which is intended to bring some rationality to laws and regulations that will, in the long run, save millions of dollars. 09/09/92 It was therefore the consensus of the Committee that the staff and the Boards of Directors had already acted in an earnest and responsible - manner by cutting $54.2 million from the 1992-93 budget and holding 1992-93 fees at the same level as 1991-92; and that further 1992-93 budget cuts would jeopardize the integrity and quality of the Districts' wastewater management program and the Boards' level of service commitment to the citizens, communities and the coastal cities for the protection of public health and the environment. The Committee was also concerned that further cutbacks would jeopardize the Districts' 301(h) Waiver NPDES Permit which saves the citizens of Orange County $50 million a year. However, the members also agreed that the Fiscal Policy Committee and staff should continue to work together to consider potential future opportunities for budgetary savings and operational economies. For these reasons, it was also the consensus of the Committee that the action of the Governor and State Legislature in confiscating up to $13.7 million (40%) of the Districts annual property tax, and the likelihood that the State will eventually take 100% or ($34.2 million) of the Districts' annual property taxes, the Directors have no viable alternative but to raise user fees. Mr. Sylvester also reported that there was information not available at this time that could affect the projected user fees. The Districts are attempting to get the most current information from the County in terms of the tax base that will be used to calculate the tax shift and how the 10% cap may apply. He also reminded the Directors of an action they took several months ago and the provision in the budget act that allows exemption from any property tax shift, for those tax monies that are dedicated to debt service. Staff and Counsel believe the Districts may qualify under that exemption and are putting together our position on that to hopefully get concurrence from the County Auditor. Preliminary information also indicates that the 10% revenue cap will probably apply in some Districts. All of these would have the affect of reducing the estimated amount of property taxes shown in the Committee reports as being confiscated. He then summarized the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation to introduce the ordinances this evening to adjust user fees with the understanding that once more definitive information is received, the Boards will have the option to adopt or reject the ordinances at the second reading. The second reading is scheduled for September 16, 1992. The Boards then entered into a lengthy discussion of the State's budget action and the proposed increase of sewer service fees for 1992-93 to make up for the loss of up to $13.7 million in Districts' local property taxes being seized by the State to help balance California's budget. During the discussion several Directors reiterated the deliberations and conclusions of the Fiscal Policy Committee and spoke in favor of the Committee's recommendation to increase in Districts sewer service fees to replace the property taxes shifted to the State by the Governor and Legislature. The point was made that there are options as reported by the Fiscal Policy Committee, but that they were short term, not in the best interests of the Districts or their -11- 09/09/92 constituents, and that under any alternative sewer service charges would ultimately have to be raised to avoid jeopardizing the Districts' fiscal and operational integrity. It was also pointed out that increasing the fees now would be better understood by the public because of their current awareness that it was precipitated by the actions of the State Legislature and Governor. It was further pointed out that the proposed fee adjustments were based on the best information currently available and that if clarifying information pertaining to certain provisions of the tax shift was forthcoming from the State or County prior to adoption of any new fees, the fees could be adjusted accordingly. Other Directors expressed concern and discomfort over the proposed sewer service fee increases and particularly the short time frame that the Boards were faced with in considering and acting on the alternatives; i.e., the need to introduce ordinances, hold first and second readings, conduct a public hearing and consider adoption, all in order to enable computerized fee data to be submitted to the County Auditor by the October 1st deadline established as part of the State's budget action. In response to a question regarding the possibility of delaying consideration and issuing a supplemental bill in.the event fees for 1992-93 were ultimately increased, Directors were advised that the County Auditor would not allow such a procedure. In response to questions concerning whether a vote in favor of introducing the proposed ordinances was considered a vote in favor of increasing the sewer service charges, it was clarified that an affirmative vote for the agenda item was only a vote to introduce the ordinance and pass to second reading and hearing on September 16th, and not necessarily a vote in favor of a fee increase. It was further clarified that the Directors reserved the right not to go forward with the proposed fee increase after second reading and the public hearing. Following further discussion and clarification of procedures to be followed in considering and voting on the agenda items pertaining to the proposed ordinances to increase 1992-93 sewer service charges, the following actions were taken by the respective Boards: DISTRICT 1 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 121 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly rdinance No. 121 is statutorily carried: exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 121, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 118, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. -12- 09/09/92 First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 121 carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 121, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 118, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 121 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 121, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 118, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 2 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 216 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 216 is statutorily carried: exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 216, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 210 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 213, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. Director Main requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 216 carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 216, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 210 Establishing Sanitary Sewer - Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 213, be read by title only; and, -13- 09/09/92 \,,a" \-awrf im FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 216 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 216, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 210 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 213, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. Director Main requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 3 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 319 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 319 is statutorily carried: exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 319, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 316, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. Directors Culver and Silva requested that their votes in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 319 carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 319, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 316, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 319 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: -14- 09/09/92 That Ordinance No. 319, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 316, be introduced and passed 1 to second reading and public hearing on September 16, 1992, ata.r� 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. Directors Culver and Silva requested that their votes in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 5 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 528 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 528 is statutorily carried: exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 528, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 525, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. Director Roth requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 528 carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 528, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 525, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 528 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 528, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 525, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. -15- 09/09/92 Director Roth requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 6 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 622 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 622 is statutorily carried: exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 622, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 619, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service.charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. Director Roth requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record., First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 622 carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 622, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 619, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 622 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 622, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 619, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. Director Roth requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. III.W, -16- 09/09/92 DISTRICT 7 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 729 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 729 is statutorily carried: exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 729, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 725 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. Director Roth requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 729 carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 729, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 725 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading -of Ordinance No. 729 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 729, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 725 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. Director Roth requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. -17- MI 09/09/92 DISTRICT 11 Actions re introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 1118 Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 1118 is statutorily carried: exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1118, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1115, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master Plan. First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly Ordinance No. 1118 carried: That proposed Ordinance No. 1118, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary \-O.Or, Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1115, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1118 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1118, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1115, be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11 Authorizing staff to develop and implement a public information program re need to raise sewer service charges to recover property taxes confiscated by the State The Directors entered into a discussion of the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation to develop a public information program explaining the need to raise Districts' sanitary sewer charges to recover property taxes confiscated by the State as a result of the actions of the Governor and State Legislature. The pros and cons and content of such a program and some alternative means of communicating with the public were also discussed. It was the concern of the Directors that development of a program should proceed and be submitted for review and further direction before implementation. -18- 09/09/92 After further comments and discussion by Directors, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to develop and i implement a public information program explaining the need to raise Districts' sanitary sewer service charges to recover property taxes confiscated by the State as a result of the action of the Governor and State Legislature that will initially take up to 40% of the Districts' annual property taxes. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel's Comments Prior to Closed Session General Counsel reported to the Directors of the need for a closed session as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9 to review: 1) A proposed settlement of litigation entitled, United States Government vs. Montrose Chemical Company, County Sanitation Districts. 2) Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the manufacturer and general contractor on Districts' two jobs relating to the co -generation combustion engines. ALL DISTRICTS Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 Minutes of the Closed Session held by prepared in accordance with California are maintained by the Board Secretary Minutes of Board and Committee Closed ALL DISTRICTS Reconvene in regular session DISTRICT 1 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: The Boards convened in closed session at 9:00 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential the Board(s) of Directors have been Government Code Section 54957.2 and in the Official Book of Confidential Meetings. At 10:07 p.m. the Boards reconvened in regular session. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to Wednesday, September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992. DISTRICT 2 Approving agreement with Richard Josephattaglia, Trustee of the Richard Joseph Battaglia Trust providing for dedication and granting of new easements necessary for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. -9-R1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-128-2, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with Richard Joseph Battaglia, Trustee of the Richard Joseph Battaglia Trust dated February 27, 1986, providing for dedication and granting of new easements necessary for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, at no cost to the District, and quitclaiming the old easement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -19- 09/09/92 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to Wednesday, September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to Wednesday, September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5'be adjourned to Wednesday, September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992. `,.) DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to Wednesday, September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to Wednesday, September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992. -20- 09/09/92 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to Wednesday, l J September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose ofd reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., September 16, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file request for annexation and authorizing That the petition from The Irvine initiation of proceedings re Company requesting annexation of proposed Annexation No. 1 - 54.52 acres of territory to the San Joaquin Hills Road Annexation District in the vicinity of San Joaquin Hills Road and Newport Coast Drive in unincorporated County territory, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-129-14, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (proposed Annexation No. i - San Joaquin Hills Road Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 14). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Don R. Roth and Director Roger R. Stanton requested that their abstentions from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m., September 16, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992. 1 a --ZAIW�Ae� Assistant SecpMrVFf the Boards of Directors4ff County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -21- m X f� i FU 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AF43 CCUN7Y SANITATICN DISTRICTS OF GRANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/12/92 POSTING DATE 08/12/92 WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123917 AC TECH CCPPANY $629741.98 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 123918 ASP ANALISIS $880000 ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS 123919 ACADEPIC FRESS S282.31 LAB SUPPLIES 123920 ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC $310900 LAB SERVICES 123921 ACCU - SLUDGE S622.52 SLUDGE SAMPLER 123922 ACTTCN RENTALS S29602.00 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 123923 ADVANCO CENSIRUC70RE INC $9069462.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-3, P1-35-2, J-22 123924 AIR. PRODUCTS L CHEMICALS T 9229571.18 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN SYST H.O.8-9-89 123925 ALCORN FENCE CO $29160.00 FENCING 123926 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT S129500.00 ASPHALT 123927 ALFHACA2 S19233.27 SPECIALTY GASES 12399'8 HERPAN-FHINNEY-KCCMUR 1109349.39 MACHINE PARTS 123929 AVER SCCIETY OF CIVIL ENCR $995000 PUBLICATION 123930 ROBCO INC L/OR AMERICAN SEALS $467.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 123931 AMERICAN SIGMA S19168.31 OPERATING SUPPLIES 123932 AVER SCCIETY FCR PICROBIOLC $312@00 PUBLICATION 1239:3 APERICAN TYPE CLLTURE CCLLECTN S228.75 LAB SUPPLIES 123934 ANCPEWtS CLASS CC S7*201.80 LAB SUPPLIES 123935 AQUATIC TESTING LABORATORY S4 000.00 LAB SERVICES 123936 ARATEX SERVICES INC S39553.71 UNIFORM RENTALS 123937 ARIZCNA INSTRUMENT $29157.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123938 RALPF U ATKINSCN S19417.07 PUMP 1215.9 RANCCLPF AUSTIN CO $849.94 TUBING 123940 BKK LAW ILL $79214098 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 123941 BRW SAFETY L SUPPLY S19169.45 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123942 BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE $32.00 BACKFLOW TESTING 123943 RALLIN CCNSTRLCTICN CO S69390000 MANHOLE COVERS 123944 BARCLAYS LAY FLELISNERS $168.38 PUBLICATIONS 123545 EA71EFY SFECIAL71ES $705.66 BATTERIES 123946 BAXTER CIAGNOS7ICS INC S159373.42 LAB SUPPLIES 123947 EECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $19200.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 123948 PIO TECH NLT• INC S163.71 SERVICE AGREEMENT 123949 PCFHRINGEF MANNHEIM $101.29 LAB SUPPLIES 123950 BP.INCERSCN CCPF S59954.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 123951 BRCWN 8 CALCWELL CONSULTING S71 023.72 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-11-1 123952 BUDGET JANITORIAL S1r650.O0 JANITORIAL SERVICES 123953 BUILDEROS EMPORIUM S216.80 HARDWARE 1239!4 RURKE ENGINEERING CC S809.58 ELECTRIC PARTS 1239°5 CARY G STREEC S19846.71 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 1239°6 PL7LER FIFER CCPPANY S72.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123957 C M I S29375.42 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 123958 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS• INC $454.23 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 123959 CAL -PAC CHEMICAL CO INC S201.90 CHEMICALS 123960 CALTRCL INC S39284.38 INSTRUMENT PARTS 123961 JCHN R CALAFPICE FhC 1189388.55 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.11-14-90 123962 CALIFCRNIA AUTO CCLLISION INC S844.37 TRUCK PARTS FUND NC 919Q w JT CIST WCRKINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 FAGF 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUKIY SAN17ATICK DISTRICTS OF CRANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID f'8/12/92 POSTING DATE 08/12/92 WARRANT N0. VEhDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 123963 CALIFCRNIA AUTOMATIC GATE S90R.74 SERVICE AGREEMENT 123964 CALIFCRKIA JCURhAL INC S167.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 123965 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC FINANCE $545.00 PUBLICATION 123966 CENTER FOR STUDY OF LAW R POLI $64.65 PUBLICATIONS 1239E7 CEKTLRY SAFETY 1NST 6 SUFP S69374.56 SAFETY SUPPLIES 123968 ChEVRCN LEA INC $5+391.0° OIL & GREASE 123969 Ch1LCREKIE HCSFITAL CF O.C. $154.54 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 123970 SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING S89563.42 BUILDING MATERIALS 123971 CLEAN -EX FAPER & CHEMICAL $407055 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 123972 TIE COEE GRCUP S127.15 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 123973 CCPFASS ELECTRCKICS CCRP $54.35 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 123974 CCPFUSA• IKC. $19220.15 COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE 123975 CONAPUOS PHOTOGRAPHY S269.38 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 123976 CONSCLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $89010.74 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 123977 CCKTINEK70L AIR TOCLS INC $398090 TOOLS 123978 CCCPEP IhCLSTRIES INC S139728.16 COMPRESSOR PARTS 123979 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $615679 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1239SO CRANE VEYOR CORP $74.21 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1239[l THE REGENTS CF THE UKIVERS17Y $69145.00 NWRI PROJECT FEES 123582 CA CEFT CF HEALTh SERVICES S49808.00 REGISTRATION - LAB ACCREDITATION 123513 STATE CF CALIFCRNIA S13.306.00 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 123984 DE AKZA CORFCRATIOK S150.00 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 123985 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $189953 LAB SUPPLIES 123986 DEW -PAR SALES R SERVICE S536.55 MANHOLE PARTS 1239A7 DEZURIK AND/CR CS CO S19715.39 VALVE PARTS 1239PS CIATEC fh%IRCKPEKTAL $39894.79 CHEMICALS 1235E9 GIFILIHFC ASSCCIATES S19224.58 PRINTING 123990 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP $39674.36 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 123991 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $132.01 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123952 DOR.ADC EKIERFRISES INC $219459.40 PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS 123953 RCRER7 F [RIVER ASSCC $39700.01 BOND -COMP INSURANCE 12355E CLNh EC61RCS CCRP S539.96 PAINT SUPPLIES 123995 CYKATECI LABCRATCRIES S189012.71 LAB EQUIPMENT 123996 EASTMAN INC $4077.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123997 DONALD ELDER $29166.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 123998 EKCHAKTER INC $5.040.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91 123959 FALCCh CISPCSAL SERVICE $39640.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 124(CC JChN B FALKEKSIEIK FE S3v400.0C CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16 1240G] FARR SALES 9 SERVICE. S8017.03 FILTERS 124602 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP $316#00 AIR FREIGHT 124043 FERRELLGAS S102.07 PROPANE 124004 FISChEP I PCRTER CO 3982.7E CHLORINATION PARTS 124005 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CC S169.3P LAB SUPPLIES 124CC6 FISChE 1h;1RLPEK7S $2229023.19 LAB EQUIPMENT M.O.2-19-92 124067 FLC-SYSTEMS $6.350*81 PUMP PARTS 124008 CLIFFORD A FOPKERT $6045.85 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 c c � rn X W FU( C 9199 JT CI5T WCRXINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 FAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNTY SANITATICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/12/92 POSTING DATE 08/12/92 WARRANT NC. VFNCCR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1240C9 FCLNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 566.64 FILM 124010 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $4*316.80 WATER USE 124n11 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $316.30 PAINT SUPPLIES 124012 FCx INDUSTRIAL SALES 5248.46 OFFICE FURNITURE 124013 GPC TRUCK I BUS CROUF 513*215.54 VEHICLE 124C14 CST• INC. 51s001.84 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 124PI5 GA NA FL LLPRER CO 5516.86 HARDWARE 124016 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $39454.73 CHEMICALS 124417 GENERAL ELECTRIC CC $840*30 ELECTRIC REPAIRS 124018 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CC. $804.52 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 124015 GIFRLiCt-PI7CFELL INC 5366.71 MECHANICAL PARTS 124R20 GRAPFIC CCNTRGLS S347094 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124021 DON GREEK 9 ASSOCIATES $169606.UC SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 124022 HAAKFR EGLIFPENT CC $19679959 VALVE 124023 MACH CCPFANY $389.28 CHEMICALS 224024 HARPIKGTCP INCLSTRIAL FLAS71 529.09 VALVE 124025 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $39805.00 TRASH REMOVAL 124026 EG HELLEROS SON INC $98.72 TOOLS 124027 HEWLETT FACKARC $39665.59 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 124028 HICKS INC. FIBERGLASS CCRP $100000 FIBERGLASS REPAIRS 124029 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC 5674.73 MECHANICAL PARTS 124030 HORIZON HIGH REACH E EQUIP $179048 TRUCK PARTS 124011 J.T. HORVATH I ASSOC. S39000000 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17 124032 RS PUGHES CC INC 519268.06 SAFETY SUPPLIES 124033 HUNTER CCFFCR/TICK 5193579302.32 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 124034 C17Y CF FUNTINGTON 6EACH 920.41 WATER USE 124035 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA 5266.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124936 HYPPOTEK INC 589345.55 OIL 124037 iMt INDLSTRiES 5237.28 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 12403P THE IDEA EANK 5111.13 PUBLICATION 124039 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $269271.98 FERRIC CHLORIDE H.O.11-14-90 124040 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRGOLCTS 5935.54 CONNECTORS 124041 1NFCTRIEVE $51.00 PUBLICATION 124042 INCRAP PAPER S39349.52 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124043 INTERMOUNTAIN SCIENTIFIC CORP 5275.63 LAB SUPPLIES 124944 PACTEL TELETRAC 5376.81 NOTEBOOK COMPUTER RENTAL 124045 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEPS $2.306.07 BATTERIES 124046 1RVINE FINCH WATER DISTRICT 5198799448.27 SEWAGE CAPACITY PURCHASE M.O.6-10-92 124047 IRVINE RANCH LATER CISTRICT $124.27 WATER USE 124048 JLA CRECI7 CCRP 5145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE 124049 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP 519200.29 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 224050 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO $49868.23 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1240P1 JCHNSTONE SUPPLY $64.38 ELECTRIC PARTS 1240E2 KARS• ACVANCEC MATERIALS INC 54044.00 LAB SERVICES 1240!3 THE KEIlk CCPFANIES $824.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35 124P54 KELLY SERVICES 5705.33 TEMPORARY SERVICES m X 1--r tz n I FUND NC WARRANT N0. 1240ce 124056 124057 124n!8 1240C-9 124C(C 124061 124062 124063 124064 124065 124066 124067 124168 1240E9 124070 124071 124072 124073 124074 124075 12407E 124077 124078 124079 124080 124081 124C8d' 124083 124084 124C85 124OPS 124CE7 124088 124089 124n90 124051 124052 124C53 124094 124095 124096 124097 124098 124099 124100 C 9199 - JT CIST WCRKINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNIY SANITATICh DISTRICTS OF CRANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID U8/12/92 POSTING DATE 08/12/92 VFhDCR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION KING REAFING IhC S299.61 MACHINE SUPPLIES KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $19309.42 PAINT SUPPLIES MARTIN KORDICK SR S39264.60 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 LAP ENGINEERING PLASTICS S29885.71 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT LA CELLLLAR IELEFhChE CC S481.38 SERVICE AGREEMENTS LA LIOLIE HAhCLING SYSTEMS S713.75 MECHANICAL PARTS LAB SUPPCRT S585.06 TEMPORARY SERVICES LAYMAN9 JONES A DYES LAWYEPS S89967.01 LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER INDUSTRIES ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION 5200.00 PUBLICATIONS LEGI-TECV S550.00 COMPUTER SERVICES LTMIICRCLE CCRF S124.68 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES SOCC-LYNCh CCRP S878.12 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES MFS $95.90 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES MACOMCO S668.85 SERVICE AGREEMENT MAINTENANCE PROOUCTS INC 529991.52 MECHANICAL PARTS MANDIC M(IORS $120.00 TOWING SERVICES MANHCLE ACJVS7IKC S89910000 MANHOLE ADJUSTING SERVICES MANLEY9S BOILEP REPAIR C09 INC S39515.8u BOILER REPAIRS MARVAC ELECTRONICS S19.50 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES MATT - ChLCR INC $19235.22 CHLORINATION PARTS D A MA711-ELS R ASSCCIATES S19764.00 INSTRUMENT CCN PALPEP S59790.00 OCEAN MONITORING MC AFEE ASSCCIATES S59469075 COMPUTER SOFTWARE LICENSE MCKENNA ENGR R EQUIP $196.01 PUMP PARTS MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS INC $419.86 INSTRUMENT PARTS HICRCSDFI CORF $159.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE FIhhESOTA LESTERh VISUAL PPES. S545.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES MIICI-ELL INSTRLMENT CC S372.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES MCDICCN9 INC S943.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $99982900 LAB SERVICES MOTICN INDUSTRIES INC $19159.00 MECHANICAL PARTS MUDGE RCSE GUTHRIE ALEXAkCE S79126.42 FINANCIAL SERVICES M.0.3-13-91 NATICNAL SAFETY CCLNCIL $69.35 SAFETY FILM RENTAL NATICNAL LATER RESEARCH S249143.00 WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE GRANT NEWARK ELECTRONICS S698.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS CITY OF NEWPORT bLACH S4.25 WATER USE DX SYSTEMS CC 5219577.68 CHLORINE M-0.10-9-91 CRANCE C(LNTY ALTC PARTS C $40.81 TRUCK PARTS CPANCE C(LhTY CFEPICAL CC 129645.9E CHEMICALS GRANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CC. S19587.39 FITTINGS ORITEX CORP S19200.19 MECHANICAL PARTS OXYGEN SERVICE S760.5l SPECIALTY GASES PC SYSTEMS DESIGN S483.80 COMPUTER HARDWARE PCL FACK)CINC S316.95 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT PST S434.61 MECHANICAL PARTS PACIFIC PARTS S349.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS m X bd A I Cn •/ 4 FU dC 9199 - JT DIST 1CPKINE CAFI AL 1 PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/12/92 POSTING DATE 08/12/92 WARRANT NC. VENCOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124101 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CC 5658.51 SAFETY SUPPLIES 124102 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $272.14 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 124103 PAK LEST 519319.3A JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124104 PARACCN CAELE 536.78 CABLE SERVICES 124105 PEPKIR-ELDER CCPFCRATION 5833.22 LAB SUPPLIES 1241JE PIMA GRC SYSTEMS INC $2479161960 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 124107 FLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $44.08 HARDWARE 124108 POLYMETRICS• INC. $109423.14 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 124109 PCLYPURE INC 5249123.05 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 124110 PCSITIVE FCRML•LATCRS• INC. $241.50 CHEMICALS 124111 PREMIER PRINTING CORP. $49834.75 PRINTING 124112 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 5262.50 ICE 124113 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. $49720.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 124114 0UES7ROR CCRF 5179157.00 LAB EQUIPMENT 124115 RJE IKTERNATICRALe INC 5732.31 LAB SUPPLIES 12411E RD SvslEpz INC $29222@00 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 124117 PECYC INC S440840082 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-13-91 124118 REGIONAL MEDIA LABORATORY 1641.57 LAB SUPPLIES 124119 MCJUNKIN-FEPUBLIC SUFPLY S1.893.97 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 124120 RCYAL BLEIRESS FCRMS INC $534.86 PRINTING 124121 RCYCE IRSIRLPERT $232.38 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124122 RYAN-NERCO 519777.88 METER 124123 JOSEPH T RYERSON 4 SON IN $464008 METAL 124124 SAFETY-KLEEN COPE $173840 PARTS CLEANER 124125 SANTA FE IRCUSTRIAL PLASTICS $39907972 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 124126 SCPUIRG APERICA $309.46 PUMP PARTS 124127 SEA COAST DESICKS 5118.52 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 124128 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $285950 WATER USE 124129 SEL SALES INC 5752.34 METER 124130 SHAMPCCK SUPFLY $118039 HARDWARE 124231 SHURELUCK SALES S149163989 HARDWARE 1241!2 SIGMA CHEPICAL CO 540.26 PUBLICATIONS 124133 SKILL PATHS INC. $198000 TRAINING REGISTRATION 124134 SKYPARK WALK-IN MECICAL CLI $19614000 PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 124139 SPITE PIPE A SLPPLY IKC $251.80 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1241!6 SCLTFERN CALIF EDISCN CC 53319579.82 POWER 124137 STAMCN 2 SPASSOFF FE $39920.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.3-11-92 124138 WESTALLOY INC S19391.41 WELDING SUPPLIES 124139 STAPLES 589.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124140 STAR TCCL R SUPPLY CC $69087.88 TOOLS 124141 STERLIRE ART 593.02 ART SUPPLIES 124142 STROPPO M PRIKTIRG 53 028.15 PRINTING 124143 SUMMIT STEEL 5737.4C METAL 124144 SUN ELECTRIC CORP 5232.37 TRUCK PARTS 324145 SUPER ICE CCRP $81.76 LAB SUPPLIES 124146 SUP-LITE ECRPCRA71CK 5551.34 MECHANICAL PARTS m X S Gd --I 0 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAIC O6/12192 POSTING DATE 08/12/92 WARRANT NO* VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124147 SYSTAT $205.LD COMPUTER SOFTWARE 124148 TCH ASSCCIATES S42loOD LAB SUPPLIES 124149 TAYLCR-CLNN PFG CCPPANY $390*42 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 124150 TEKDRAULICS S59064932 MACHINE REPAIRS 124151 TELAUTOGRAPH CORPORATION 5168.35 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 124152 THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL $184944 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1241f3 THCMASON PECNAN'ICAL CORP 519600.00 PUMP REPAIRS 1241!4 THCFPSCN INCUST41AL SLPFLY 522.82 MECHANICAL PARTS 1241FE TCNYIS LOCK R SAFE SERVICE $96.55 LOCKSMITH SERVICES 124156 TOYO LANCSCAPING CO 519555902 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.11-13-91 124157 TRANSCHEM 519043.68 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 124158 TRUCK K AUTO SUPPLY INC 5230.71 TRUCK PARTS 1241£9 THE LNISCLPCE CCRF $363.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124160 UNITEC PARCEL SERVICE S315019 PARCEL SERVICES 1241E1 VCC IEE71KG 579000.00 EMISSIONS TESTING 124162 V6R SCIENi1FIC $69848037 LAB SUPPLIES 124163 VS SYSTEMS INC $155*90 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124164 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $19145*79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1241E' VARIAN .ANALYTICAL INSTRLPEN7S 519123.53 LAB SUPPLIES 1241E6 VILLACE NLRSERIES S60.64 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 1241E7 HAY60TF9 TNCCRPCPATEC 5805.97 OFFICE FURNITURE 124168 WESTERN STATES ChEMICAL SUPPLY $509183*96 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-8-90 124169 WESTIN ENGINEERING 129167.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES 124170 WESCO S21541940 ELECTRIC PARTS 124171 WHATPAN LAB SALES INC 525.85 LAB SUPPLIES 124172 WHITNEY PACHINERY INC $19508*58 TRUCK PARTS 124173 6AVEFLY9 INC $329993 LAB SUPPLIES 124174 XERCK CCRP $89948980 COPIER LEASES 124175 ZIE6ARTH A ALPER/C.S. ALPER S409000oOO ..---------------- CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 TOTAL CLAIMS FAIL O0/12/92 $599249171*35 m X 2 bd 1 V k� a FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/07/92 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/12/92 POSTING DATE 08/12/92 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $595.00 #2 OPER FUND $9,143.84 #2 CAP PAC FUND $6,022.15 #3 OPER FUND $24,773.87 #5 OPER FUND $10,752.02 #5 CAP FAC FUND $4,831.90 #7 OPER FUND $2,917.07 #7 CAP FAC FUND $1,882,094.30 #11 OPER FUND $6,691.01 #14 OPER FUND $82.24 #14 CAP FAC FUND $6,869.80 #5&6 OPER FUND $203.65 #6&7 OPER FUND $3,813.12 #7&14 OPER FUND $170.39 JT OPER FUND $1,003,566.85 CORF $2,815,662.45 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $0.00 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $145,981.49 -------------- $5,924,171.15 c FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE I REPORT NUMBER AP43 CGUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAIL 08/26/92 POSTING DATE 08/26/92 WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124193 AG TECH COMPANY $729305.35 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 124154 ASR ANALYSIS $29380.00 ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS 124155 A T 6 T $31660.89 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 124196 AMERICAN TELEFHONE S TELEGRAPh $19504001 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 124197 A T 9 T $380.04 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 124198 AYWA/I+PCF RESIDUALS MGMT S29.93 LAB SUPPLIES 124199 ACACEPIC FRESS S389.51 LAB SUPPLIES 1242C0 AIR COLC SLFFLY INC $646.50 AIR CONDITIONER SUPPLIES 124201 AIR FRCDLCTS R CHEMICAL IN S169815000 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN SYST M.O.8-9-89 124202 RCBCO 116C VCR APERICAN SEALS S59.22 PUMP PARTS 124203 AMERSHAP CCRP S344.80 LAB SUPPLIES 1242C4 KE7EPA INC $19052.10 MECHANICAL PARTS 124205 ANAHEIM SEWER CCNSTRUCTION S29009.85 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS 124206 ABC LABORATORIES S19630.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 124207 ART SUPPLY WHSE $87.59 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 124208 DENTAL INSURANCE CONSULT. S48.00 DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATOR 124209 RAU SAFEIY I SUPPLY $19935.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES 12421C EANANA ELLEFRINT $39393013 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES 124211 8 BATEPAA S600.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 124212 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $185.82 BATTERIES 124213 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC i109259.25 LAB SUPPLIES 124214 J 3 H PEACE INC $222.85 LAB SUPPLIES 124215 BERTECH $526.06 ELECTRIC PARTS 124216 BCLSA RACIATCR SERVICE $857.55 TRUCK REPAIRS 1242I7 RON-A-RUES $208.88 TRUCK PARTS 124218 DUILDER•S EMPORIUM $256.11 HARDWARE/LUMBER 124219 BUSH ANC ASSCCIATES INC $19580000 SURVEY SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 124220 CARY 6 SIP.EEC S59455.92 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 124221 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY $737.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124222 CEPA $75.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 124223 CH2M HILL $699.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 124224 SUMMIT SOLLTICNS• INC $454.23 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 124225 CS CCMPANY S101.77 GAUGE 124226 CACDYLAK SYSTEMS INC $193.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124227 CAL -GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $720.29 LAB SUPPLIES 124228 CALTROL INC $10.180050 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124229 CALIFCRNIA AUTO CCLLISION INC S19403094 TRUCK REPAIRS 124230 CENTLRY SAFETY INST S SUFV $49662.36 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1242!1 CHRCPE CFANKSFAFI INC S570.00 FITTINGS 124232 SOUTHERN CAL PA TE R IA L HANDLING $39002.99 BUILDING MATERIALS 124233 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT S59881.78 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1242'_4 COLICH AND SONS S20 959291.00 CONSTRUCTION I-9 124235 CCLTCN EOLIPPEAT CC $485.77 TRUCK PARTS 1242.6 CCPPLIER FRCDLCTS PLLS $166.47 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124237 CCPPLSA9 INC. $39831.82 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE 124238 CONARDOS PHOTOGRAPHY S269.38 PHOTO SERVICES m X 2 .-r bCl Gd I N FU( _ 9199 - JT DIST 1(FKIA@ CAFIIAL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/26/92 POSTING DATE 08/26/92 WARRAK1 NC. VEhCOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124239 COANELL CM PARTS / DIV S29744.22 TRUCK PARTS 124240 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $59254.95 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 124241 CONTINENTAL AIR TOCLS INC S19840.97 TOOLS 124242 CCATIAEATAL CHEMICAL CC $29155.00 CHLORINE M.0.9-9-91 1.24243 CCATRACICFIS ECCK STCRE $1►213.50 PUBLICATIONS 124244 CCCPER INCUSTRIES INC 5378.17 COMPRESSOR PARTS 124245 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY S732.65 TRUCK PARTS 124246 CCUNTY 6fCLESALE. ELECTRIC t328.29 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 124247 VERAE CCM CC* REAL ESTATE APPR $79500.00 APPRAISAL SERVICES DIST 6 124248 CHARLES F CRCWLEY CC $176@59 PUMP PARTS 124249 CROWN FENCE CO $855000 FENCING 124250 CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW MAINT. $29250.00 WINDOW CLEANING 1242°1 DME INC $555.07 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 124252 DAMES S M(CRE S249526.53 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-3 1242°3 DAKIELS TIRE SERVICE S19332.58 TIRES 124254 MICHAEL K CASKALAKIS S69697.50 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 124255 DE GUELLE 6 SONS GLASS CO $69.08 GLASS 124256 DELL COMPUTER CORP S287.80 COMPUTER REPAIRS 1242E7 DE7URIK AND/CP CS CO $139717.07 VALVE PARTS 1242a8 CTATEC M IRCKMENTAL t19936.97 CHEMICALS 1242!9 CICKSCNS S859.84 APPLIANCE 124260 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP t673.46 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 124261 DUNN EDWARDS CORP $69012911 PAINT SUPPLIES 124262 OURO-SENSE CORP S749.57 MECHANICAL PARTS 124263 E.C.S. S252.00 PUBLICATION 124264 EIL INSTRUMENTS INC S75.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124265 EASTMAN INC S69534.04 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124266 ECOANALYSIS INC S961.76 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91 124267 ELECTRIC EEL MAAUFACTURIKG C S182.48 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 124PEB ENCHANTER IKC $59040.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91 1242E5 E%VIPCbET1CS9 1KC S29396.40 LAB SUPPLIES 124270 EIT $99701.36 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124271 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC $646.50 LAB SERVICES 124272 EUPOTHERM RECCRDERS INC $339.48 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124273 FST SAAC ANC CRAVEL INC S326.37 ROAD BASE 124274 MARSfALL FAIRRES S78.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 124275 FALCCA CISPCSAL SERVICE S99080.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 124276 JOHN F FALKENSTEIN PE $39400000 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16 124277 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP S267.25 AIR FREIGHT 124278 FIRST COMFANY $256.45 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124279 FISCFER A PCRTER CO $49177.71 CHLORINATION PARTS 1242E0 FISHER SCIEKIIFIC CC S371.74 LAB SUPPLIES 124281 FISCAS INSTRUMENTS S109635.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 124282 FLO-SYSTEMS S336.58 PUMP PARTS 124283 FCLSOM LAKE FORC S169987.44 TRUCK 124284 FCMEECRES CCMFAKY S228.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WERKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCUATY SANITATICN DISTRICTS OF CRANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID G8/26/92 POSTING DATE G8/26/92 WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124285 FCUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $10.33 FILM 124286 FCLNIAIN tiALLEY PAINT 519796.57 PAINT SUPPLIES 124287 FCM INOUS1R1AL SALES 529261.59 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124288 FREEDOM IMAGING $123.76 SERVICE AGREEMENT 124289 BUD FREY $21.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 124250 CITY OF FULLERTCN 596.91 WATER USE 124291 CPC TRUCK I EUS CRCUF 5139215.54 TRUCK 124252 CANAFL LLPBER CC $19113.4P BUILDING MATERIALS 124293 GARRATT-CALLAtAN COPFANY 5387.90 CHEMICALS 124294 GATES FIPERGLASS INSTALLERS $19600,00 FIBERGLASS PIPE 124295 GENERAL TELEPHONE CC 259380.38 TELEPHONE SERVICES 124296 GIERLICP•P17CPELL INC 529443.77 MECHANICAL PARTS 124297 GLCBAL CCPPUTER SUFPLIES 5358.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124298 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS 595.9D CAMERA 124299 DCN GREEN 6 ASSOCIATES $189959000 SURVEY SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 124300 HACH CCPFANY $881.45 LAB SUPPLIES 1243t1 FRED A FARFER S19500000 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1243E2 HARRINGTCN INCUSTRIAL PLASTI $331.78 FITTINGS 124303 HATCH 6 KIRK INC $442.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 124304 FL HAWN CO INC 5154.19 FILTERS 124305 HILTI INC S29004075 ELECTRIC PARTS 1243t6 HI SIANCAFE ALICPCTIVE 5370.25 TRUCK REPAIRS 124307 HCEFER SCIENTIFIC INSTR. 519262.58 LAB SUPPLIES 124308 HOCRBIGER CVS CALIF INC $29107.70 COMPRESSOR PARTS 124309 HOKE CONTROLS DIV/HONE• INC. 5362.21 VALVE 124310 J.T. hORVATH I ASSOC. $29100900 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17 124311 RS HLGFE: CC INC 519124.31 PAINT SUPPLIES 124312 HUNTING7CN BEACP RUBBER STA 574.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124313 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN C $129.10 BICYCLE PARTS 124334 IMO INDUSTRIES $19692.21 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 124315 IRP PECHANALYSIS 5255.08 INSTRUMENT 124316 TPE ICEA SANK $144080 PUBLICATION 124311 1PFERIAL &EST CHEMICAL 5139004.18 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-14-90 124318 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $19201.57 CONNECTORS 124319 INSIDE E.P.A. 5137.25 PUBLICATION 124320 INTEPPOLNIAIN SCIENTIFIC CCRP 570.5l LAB SUPPLIES 124321 IN£TPLHEN7 SPECIALISTS $39660.00 INSTRUMENT RENTAL 124322 1NTECRATEC BUSINESS INT9 INC $959114.88 LAB FURNITURE M.O.4-8-92 124323 PACTEL TELETRAC 525.00 TELEPHONE SERVICES 124324 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $243941 BATTERIES 124325 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $4.90 WATER USE 124326 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SbPP $779.49 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124327 JIP9S SLSFENSICN SERVICE $30.00 VEHICLE REPAIRS 124328 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $748.71 ELECTRIC PARTS 124329 JONES CHEMICALS INC 569274.74 _ CHEMICALS 124E30 JCNES INCUSTRIAL HARDWARE C S169.28 TOOL t� • FU( 9199 - JT DIST WCRKIhG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/26/92 POSTING DATE 08/26/92 WARRANT NC. VENDCR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124331 KARS• ADVANCED MATERIALS INC S49995.00 LAB SERVICES 124332 KING BEARING INC S40803014 MACHINE SUPPLIES 1243!3 KNCX INCLSTRIAL SUFFLIES S19423.74 TOOLS 124334 LAY CFFICES CF RCEERT L LAVOIE S144.01 LEGAL SERVICES - FLORES V. DALEY 124335 LEARN KEY $54.95 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 124336 LEWCO ELECTRIC CO S302.92 TRUCK REPAIRS 124337 LIFECCM-SAFETY SERVICE SUFPL $107.75 SAFETY SUPPLIES 124338 SCCC-LYNCh CCRP S702.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124339 MPS S203.32 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 124340 MACOMCO $316.07 SERVICE AGREEMENT 124341 NAG SYSTEMS S559.02 INSTRUMENT 124342 MAINTENAhCE PROCUCTS INC $396.52 MECHANICAL PARTS 124343 PANCIC PCTCRS $52.50 TOWING SERVICES 124344 MARVAC ELECTRCNICS S47.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124345 MATT - CHLOR INC S338.88 CHLORINATION PARTS 124346 DON PAUPER S29640.00 OCEAN MONITORING 124347 MCBAIh INSTRUMENTS S29259.77 INSTRUMENTS 12434E PEASLPEPEP1 VARIABLES $985.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124349 PERICIAN EIAGNCSTICS INC $273,00 LAB SUPPLIES 124350 MES COMPANY $189826.43 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 124351 MIDWAY PFG 9 MACHINING S99890037 MECHANICAL PARTS 1243!2 PINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CC $49291917 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1241!! MINNESOTA tESIERN VISLAL FRES. S437.94 VIDEO SUPPLIES 124354 PISSICN AERASIVE SUPPLIES $260.21 HARDWARE 124355 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO S19254.00 ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT 124356 MLAOEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $1719252.00 CONSTRUCTION 2-30 124357 NATICNAL SAFETY COLNCIL $191.18 SAFETY FILM RENTAL 1243°8 NATICNAL SANITAPY SLFPLY S109.04 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124359 NEW ERUNSLICK SCIENTIFIC S49949060 LAB SUPPLIES 124360 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $13.03 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124361 NGRTHWESTERN CARBON S8*449.60 CHEMICALS 1243E2 NOVELL S425.62 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1243E3 Ox SYSIEPS CC $519105.82 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91 124364 OLYPPUS CCRP $239705.00 INSTRUMENT 124365 ORACLE CORPORATION $550.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 124366 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO $39979.02 HYDROCHLORIC ACID 1243E7 CRANCE VALVE R FITTING CC. S19458.78 FITTINGS 1243EB CVVGEN SERVICE S2v438.56 SPECIALTY GASES 124369 CSDOC SELF -FUNDED MEDICAL I S1J0r000.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE 124370 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $831.29 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 124371 PC SYSTEMS DESIGN S900618.57 COMPUTER HARDWARE M.O.6-10-92 124372 PACIFIC FARTS $29589.73 COMPRESSOR PARTS 124373 PACIFIC SAFETY EGLIFFENT CC $792.44 SAFETY SUPPLIES 124374 PACIFIC EELL S274.38 TELEPHONE SERVICES 124375 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C S68.40 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 124376 PAK LEST S130.97 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES m X to tz I Ln FUND NC 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAIC 08/26/92 POSTING DATE 08/26/92 WARRANT NC. VENOCR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124377 PALMIERI• TYLER9 WIENER* S39373.00 LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELLS 124378 FARTS LNLIMITED S19296.00 TRUCK PARTS 124379 RCV PENCERGRAFT $460.70 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1243E0 FICKIICK FAPEP S350.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124381 PIMA GRC SYSTEPS INC $1179483.28 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 124382 PIONEER BANK S169062.40 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-34-3 124383 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES S149.34 PLASTIC BOTTLES 1243E4 PCLYPURE INC S219046.00 CHEMICALS 124385 PCRE71CS CCRP S607.96 LAB SUPPLIES 124386 PCWER ELECTRC SUPPLY CO S783.62 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 124387 PREMIUM CONNECTING POINT S231.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124388 PREMIER PRINTING CORP. $431.00 PRINTING 1243E9 HAROLC PPiMRCSF ICE $308.00 ICE 124390 ThE FROuECT SCLUTIONS CC. S49968.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 124351 FRC-TECF LAB S59250900 PUMP PARTS 124392 RMB ENGINEERING/MILLTRONICS $624.95 INSTRUMENT 124393 STEVE P. RAOOS• INC. S4619686.50 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A-2 124394 RAINBCW EISPCSAL CC S19430.09 TRASH REMOVAL 124395 RECYC INC S599896957 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-13-91 124396 PED1 EMPRESS S40.95 MESSENGER SERVICES 124397 RA REED ELECTRIC S1v282.97 ELECTRICAL_REPAIRS 124398 THF. REGISTER $895635 NOTICES & ADS 124399 MCJUNKIN-PEPUBLIC SUPPLY $79059.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1244CO RCSEPCUAT ANALYTICAL S846.78 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124461 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC S29U35.67 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124402 PEGGY RUPP S540.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 124403 RYAN-HERCC S139589.60 PUMPS 124404 SAFETY-KLEEN CCRP S29928.54 PARTS CLEANER 1244CB SAND DCLLAR PLSINESS FCRMS $728.06 PRINTING 124406 SANTA ANA ELECTPIC MOTORS S265.46 ELECTRIC PARTS 124407 SANTA FE IWDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $49993.54 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 124408 SCHEPING-FLOUG14 $48.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 124409 SCNWING AMERICA $19257.29 ELECTRIC PARTS 124410 SCIENCE lFPLICA7IOkS IK79L S289063.64 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-12-91 124411 SEA COAST DESICNS S19348.24 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 124412 SMIMPO AMERICA CORP $95.39 METER 124413 SHURELUCK SALES S11r075.75 HARDWARE 124414 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO S37.64 LAB SUPPLIES 124415 SILVEKI S LE BCUEF $1449561.60 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3 124416 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI S19411.50 PRE -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 124417 SMITH-F.MEPY CC 3794.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 124418 SCUT- CCPST WATER S95.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 124419 SCUTI-ERN CALIF EDISON CC S2159652.14 POWER 124420 SO CAL GAS CO $99322.29 NATURAL GAS 124421 SCUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO S189404067 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 124422 SCUVENIR FPOTC $91.87 FILM PROCESSING C C C m X •-r l7d 0-1 d 4, FUNb-..0 9199 - JT GIST YCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 FAGE 6 REPOR7 NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/26/92 POSTING DATE 08/26/92 WARRANT NO. VENCOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124423 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 329615.62 COOLER RENTALS/DRINKING WATER 124424 WESTALLCY INC S19917088 WELDING SUPPLIES 124425 SPECIALIZEC PROCLC7S CC $487.31 ELECTRIC PARTS 124426 SPEX INDUSTRIES INC $19474.37 LAB SUPPLIES 124427 SRECO FLEXIBLE $130.28 TRUCK PARTS 124428 SUPELCO INC S19173.54 LAB SUPPLIES 124429 SLFER Cl- EF CCRF $379.87 CHEMICALS 124430 TAYLCP-CUNN FFG COMPANY 1879281.24 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 124431 DR GEORGE TCHOBANOGLOUS $972.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 124432 TEKDRAULICS S219056.51 MECHANICAL PARTS 124433 37 EOUIPPEN7 CCMPANY S235.05 FITTINGS 1244.14 TONY►S LCCK 6 SAFE SERVICE' S495.48 SECURITY SERVICES 124435 TRAVEL TRAVEL $724.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 124436 TRUC$ A AUTC SUPPLY INC S819.75 TRUCK PARTS 1244!7 JG TUCKER S SCk INC S29918.95 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124438 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $838.00 LAB SUPPLIES 124439 UNOCAL $76.00 UNLEADED GASOLINE 124440 UNITEC CCRCRETE COMPANIES S945.54 CONCRETE 124441 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $340.64 PARCEL SERVICES 124442 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP $238.50 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 124443 VWR SCIENTIFIC $39086.75 LAB SUPPLIES 124444 VALLEY C17IES SUPPLY CO $19747.92 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 124445 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL S19410.59 ENGINE PARTS 124446 VAf11EP BUSINESS FORMS $597008 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124447 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS S49517.42 LAB SUPPLIES 124448 VERTEX SYSTEMS S812.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 124449 VILLAEE NLRSERIES S864.38 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 124450 WATER ENVIRCNMENT FED. S197.45 PUBLICATION 124451 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY S509924.32 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90 1244E2 WESTINGHCLSE ELECTRIC COPP S319.80 ELECTRIC PARTS 1244E_3 LILLCAN ISSCCIATES S3.397.61 ENGINEERING SERVICES 124454 W17EG SCIENTIFIC $468.72 LAB SUPPLIES 124455 XEROX CORP S29052.46 COPIER LEASES 1244E6 GEORGE YARDLEY CC S700.83 LAB SUPPLIES 124457 71ERART►• ANC ALPER S62.194.33 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-1 124458 RICHARD E ECGAR ----------------- $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 08/26/92 ----------------- $49638053.95 m x 2 ,- 4 bd r FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/26/92 POSTING DATE 08/26/92 SUMMARY #1 CAP PAC FUND #2 OPER FUND #2 CAP FAC FUND #3 OPER FUND #3 CAP FAC FUND #5 OPER FUND #5 CAP FAC FUND #6 OPER FUND #7 OPER FUND #7 CAP FAC FUND #12 OPER FUND #14 CAP FAC FUND #5&6 OPER FUND #7&14 OPER FUND JT OPER FUND CORF SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 0 AMOUNT $46,763.65 $6,381.83 $171,723.28 $27,292.05 $596.28 $4,635.88 $160,624.00 $26.69 $4,275.75 $10,708.45 $677.18 $430,455.85 $3,838.74 $5,430.74 $826,685.01 $2,679,507.83 $101,023.30 $157,907.44 $4,638,553.95 C STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on 199A was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on , 19AL. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day .of 19,9a,. 00, Penny Kyle, i nt ecretary of each of the BoarV of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California F27A.1