HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-09-09COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
(714)962-2411
September 9, 1992
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 1992 - 7:30 P.M.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of
Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and
date.
Assi taut V
Secretary
Tentatively -Scheduled Upcoming Meetings:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, September 23rd, at 5:30 p.m.
CONSERVATION, RECYCLE - Tuesday, September 29th, at 5:30 p.m.
& REUSE COMMITTEE
cl�A
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
P.O. 80X 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8'
17141982-2411
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Joint Board Meetinas
September
Sep
09,
1992
October
Oct
14,
1992
November
Nov
11,
1992**
December
Dec
09,
1992
January
Jan
13,
1993
February
Feb
10,
1993
March
Mar
10,
1993
April
Apr
14,
1993
May
May
12,
1993
June
Jun
09,
1993
July
Jul
14,
1993
August
Aug
11,
1992
September
Sep
08,
1993
Executive Committee Meetinas
Sep 23, 1992
Oct 28, 1992
None Scheduled
None Scheduled
Jan 27, 1993
Feb 24, 1993
Mar 24, 1993
Apr 28, 1993
May 26, 1993
Jun 23, 1993
Jul 28, 1993
None Scheduled
Sep 22, 1993
** Holiday - New meeting date to be determined (Tentatively,
November 18, 1992)
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts
-31 of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 9, 1992 - 7:30 P.M.
P.O. Box 8427 0108" Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2414
AGENDA
In accordance with the requirements of California Government
Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72
hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written
materials relating to each agenda item are available for public
inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is
proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or
action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or
as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts
of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if
any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
(5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards
on specific agenda items or matters of general interest
should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
(6) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel
present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general
interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Chairman
(b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of General Counsel
11
9/09/92
(7) EACH DISTRICT
ACTION: If no corrections
or
amendments are made, the
following
minutes will be deemed approved as
mailed and
be so ordered
by the Chairman:
District
1 - August
12,
1992 regular
District
2 - August
12,
1992 regular
District
3 - August
12,
1992 regular
District
5 - August
12,
1992 regular
District
6 - August
12,
1992 regular
District
7 - August
12,
1992 regular
District 11 - August 12, 1992 regular
District 13 - August 12, 1992 regular
District 14 - August 12, 1992 regular
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of
claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows:
(Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will
be regarded as the same for each District represented unless
a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any
District.) See pages "A" and "B"
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund -
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund -
Joint Working -Capital Fund -
Self -Funded Insurance Funds -
DISTRICT NO. 1 -
DISTRICT NO. 2 -
DISTRICT NO. 3 -
DISTRICT NO. 5
DISTRICT NO. 6
DISTRICT NO. 7
DISTRICT NO. 11
DISTRICT NO. 13
DISTRICT NO. 14
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT -
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT -
-2-
8/12/52
$1,003,566.85
2,815,662.45
145,981.49
-0-
595.00
15,165.99
24,773:87
15,583.92
-0-
1,885,011.37
6,691.01
-0-
6,952.04
203.65
3,813.12
170.39
$5,924,171.15
8/26/92
$ 826,685.01
2,679,507.83
157,907.44
101,023.30
46,763.65
178,105.11
27,888.33
165,259.88
26.69
14,984.20
677.18
-0-
430,455.85
3,838.74
-0-
5,430.74
$4,638,553.95
9/09/92
�J
9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(j)
All matters placed on the consent calendar are
considered as not requiring discussion or further
explanation and unless any particular item is
requested to be removed from the consent calendar by
a Director, staff member, or member of the public in
attendance, there will be no separate discussion of
these items. All items on the consent calendar will
be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included
on the consent calendar. All items removed from the
consent calendar shall be considered in the regular
order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item
from the consent, calendar shall, upon recognition by
the chair, state their name, address and designate
by letter the item to be removed from the consent
calendar.
The Chairman will determine if any items are to be
deleted from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items
appearing on the consent calendar not specifically
removed from same, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase
order contract for Microcomputer Hardware, Software
and Associated Peripherals, Specification
No. E-219, for 11 systems, to Golden Star
Technology, Inc. for a total amount not to exceed
$55,853.00 plus sales tax. See page "C"
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue
a purchase order to Beckman Instruments, Inc. in
the amount of $42,966.00 plus sales tax, for
Purchase of One Tabletop Optima TL Ultracentrifuge
(Specification No. E-220).
(c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 12 to the plans and specifications for Central
Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing an addition
of $58,714.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts
Corporation for 15 items of additional work, and
granting a time extension of 72 calendar days for
completion of said additional work. See page
I' D"
9/09/92
9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 13 to the plans and specifications for
Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1,
Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of
$46,279.00 to the contract with Hunter
Corporation for five items of additional work.
See page "E"
(e) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 13 to the plans and specifications for
Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3;
Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and
Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare
Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21,
authorizing an addition of $15,957.00 to the
contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of
Zurn Constructors, Inc., for two items of
additional work. See page "F"
(f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 5 to the plans and specifications for
Electrification of Pump Drives &t Treatment Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, authorizing an addition of
$17,689.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper
and C. S. Alper Construction Co., Inc., for six
items of additional work. See page "G"
(g) Consideration of the following actions relative
to Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System,
Job No. J-28:
(1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum
No. 1 to the plans and specifications for
said job, changing the,date for receipt of
bids from June 9, 1992 to July 7, 1992.
(2) Consideration of motion approving Addendum
No. 2 to the plans and specifications for
said job, changing the date for receipt of
bids from July 7, 1992 to August 4, 1992.
(3) Consideration of motion approving Addendum
No. 3 to the plans and specifications for
said job, deleting three pump stations;
revising requirements; and making
miscellaneous technical modifications.
(4) Consideration of motion approving Addendum
No. 4 to the plans and specifications for
said job, deleting one pump station and
making miscellaneous technical
modifications.
(5) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-126,
receiving and filing bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding contract for _
said project to Domar Electric, Inc., in the
total amount of $374,100.00. See page
"H"
-4-
9/09/92
9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(h) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-127, approving
Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for
preparation of Wastewater Quality, Diversion and
Treatment Study, providing for a reallocation of
the costs among categories within said agreement,
with no change in the maximum authorized
compensation of $88,055.00. See page "I"
DISTRICT 2
(i) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-128-2,
approving and authorizing execution of agreement
with Richard Joseph Battaglia, Trustee of the
Richard Joseph Battaglia Trust dated February 27,
1986, providing for dedication and granting of new
easements necessary for Rehabilitation of Cypress
Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, at no
cost to the District, and quitclaiming the old
easement. See page Hill
DISTRICT 14
(j) Consideration of motion to receive and file
petition from The Irvine Company requesting
annexation of 54.52 acres of territory to the
District in the vicinity of San Joaquin Hills Road
and Newport Coast Drive in unincorporated County
territory; and consideration of Resolution
No. 92-129-14, authorizing initiation of
proceedings to annex said territory to the
District (proposed Annexation No. 1 - San Joaquin
Hills Road Annexation to County Sanitation
District No. 14). See pages "K" and "L"
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar,
if any
-5-
9/09/92
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee and consideration of
motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's
written report of the meeting held on September 2, 1992
(Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material).
(b) Consideration of action on the following items recommeded
by said Committee:
(c) DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7 & 11
Consideration of the following items re introduction of
proposed ordinances increasing sanitary sewer service
charges to replace Districts' property taxes confiscated
by the State: See page "M"
(1) verbal report of staff and General Counsel re
proposed Ordinances.
(2) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of actions relative to proposed
Ordinance No. 121, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 118:
(a) Consideration of motion making finding that
adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exemptl
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and
21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a
regulatory action taken by the District to
assure the protection of the environment; and
the increased revenues to be received by the
sanitary sewer service charges will be used for
meeting operational and maintenance expenses and
meeting financial reserves and capital
requirements which are necessary for the
continued maintenance of service within existing
defined service areas of the Districts as set
forth in the comprehensive Master Plan.
(b) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance
No. 121 by title only, and waive reading of
entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous
vote of Directors present).
(c) Consideration of motion to introduce said
Ordinance No. 121 and pass to second reading and
hearing on September 16, 1992.
[ITEM (11) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7]
9/09/92
(11) ALL DISTRICTS (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 6)
(c) (3) DISTRICT 2
�r✓
Consideration of actions relative to proposed
Ordinance No. 216, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 210
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 213:
(a) Consideration of motion making finding that
adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and
21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a
regulatory action taken by the District to
assure the protection of the environment; and
the increased revenues to be received by the
sanitary sewer service charges will be used for
meeting operational and maintenance expenses and
meeting financial reserves and capital
requirements which are necessary for the
continued maintenance of service within existing
defined service areas of the Districts as set
forth in the comprehensive Master Plan.
(b) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance
No. 216 by title only, and waive reading of
entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous
vote of Directors present).
(c) Consideration of motion to introduce said
Ordinance No. 216 and pass to second reading and
hearing on September 16, 1992.
(4) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of actions relative to proposed
Ordinance No. 319, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 316:
(a) Consideration of motion making finding that
adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and
21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a
regulatory action taken by the District to
assure the protection of the environment; and
the increased revenues to be received by the
sanitary sewer service charges will be used for
meeting operational and maintenance expenses and
meeting financial reserves and capital
requirements which are necessary for the
continued maintenance of service within existing
defined service areas, of the Districts as set
forth in the comprehensive Master Plan.
(b) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance
No. 319 by title only, and waive reading of
entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous
vote of Directors present).
(c) Consideration of motion to introduce said
Ordinance No. 319 and pass to second reading and
hearing on September 16, 1992.
[ITEM (11) CONTINUED ON PAGE 8]
-7-
9/09/92
(11) ALL DISTRICTS (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 7)
(c) (5) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of actions relative to proposed
Ordinance No. 528, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 525:
(a) Consideration of motion making finding that
adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and
21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a
regulatory action taken by the District to
assure the protection of the environment; and
the increased revenues to be received by the
sanitary sewer service charges will be used for
meeting operational and maintenance expenses and
meeting financial reserves and capital
requirements which are necessary for the
continued maintenance of service within existing
defined service areas of the Districts as set
forth in the comprehensive Master Plan.
(b) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance
No. 528 by title only, and waive reading of
entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous
vote of Directors present).
(c) Consideration of motion to introduce said
Ordinance No. 528 and pass to second reading and
hearing on September 16, 1992.
(6) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of actions relative to proposed l ;
Ordinance No. 622, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of
Orange County, California, Amending. Ordinance No. 609
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and
Repealing Ordinance No. 619:
(a) Consideration of motion making finding that
adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and
21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a
regulatory action taken by the District to
assure the protection of the environment; and
the increased revenues to be received by the
sanitary sewer service charges will be used for
meeting operational and maintenance expenses and
meeting financial reserves and capital
requirements which are necessary for the
continued maintenance of service within existing
defined service areas of the Districts as set
forth in the comprehensive Master Plan.
(b) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance
No. 622 by title only, and waive reading of
entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous
vote of Directors present).
(c) Consideration of motion to introduce said
Ordinance No. 622 and pass to second reading and
hearing on September 16, 1992. l
[ITEM (11) CONTINUED ON PAGE 91
-8-
9/09/92
(11) ALL DISTRICTS (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 8)
(c) (7) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of actions relative to proposed
Ordinance No. 729, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 725
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges:
(a) Consideration of motion making finding that
adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and
21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a
regulatory action taken by the District to
assure the protection of the environment; and
the increased revenues to be received by the
sanitary sewer service charges will be used for
meeting operational and maintenance expenses and
meeting financial reserves and capital
requirements which are necessary for the
continued maintenance of service within existing
defined service areas of the Districts as set
forth in the comprehensive Master Plan.
(b) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance
No. 729 by title only, and waive reading of
entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous
vote of Directors present).
(c) Consideration of motion to introduce said
Ordinance No. 729 and pass to second reading and
hearing on September 16, 1992.
(8) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of actions relative to proposed
Ordinance No. 1118, An Ordinance of the Board of
`�•�� Directors of County Sanitation District No. it of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance
No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges,
and Repealing Ordinance No. 1115:
(a) Consideration of motion making finding that
adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt
pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and
21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a
regulatory action taken by the District to
assure the protection of the environment; and
the increased revenues to be received by,the
sanitary sewer service charges will be used for
meeting operational and maintenance expenses and
meeting financial reserves and capital
requirements which are necessary for the
continued maintenance of service within existing
defined service areas of the Districts as set
forth in the comprehensive Master Plan.
(b) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance
No. 1118 by title only, and waive reading of
entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous
vote of Directors present).
(c) Consideration of motion to introduce said
Ordinance No. 1118 and pass to second reading
and hearing on September 16, 1992.
�1
-9-
9/09/92
(11) (d) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing staff
to develop and implement a public information program
explaining the need to raise Districts' sanitary sewer
service charges to recover property taxes confiscated by
the State as a result of the action of the Governor and
State Legislature that will initially take up to 40% of
the Districts' annual property taxes.
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Closed Session: During the course of conducting the
business set forth on this agenda as a regular
meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the
Boards in closed session to consider matters of
pending or potential litigation, or personnel
matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9
or 54957.6.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real
property; (b) matters of pending or potential
litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are
exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards
during a permitted closed session and are not
available for public inspection. At such time as
final actions are taken by the Directors on any of
these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required
disclosures of information.
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
(b) Reconvene in regular session
(c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered
in closed session.
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(14) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(15) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn to Wednesday, September 16,
1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of
reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting
the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of
ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary.
(16) DISTRICT 2
Other usiness and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(17) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn to Wednesday, September 16,
1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of
reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting
the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of
ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary.
-10-
9/09/92
(18) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(19) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn to Wednesday, September 16,
1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of
reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting
the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of
ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary.
(20) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(21) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn to Wednesday, September 16,
1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of
reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting
the 1992-93.sewer service charges and consideration of
ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary.
(22) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(23) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn to Wednesday, September 16,
1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of
��..✓ reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting
the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of
ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary.
(24) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(25,) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn to Wednesday, September 16,
1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of
reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting
the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of
ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary.
(26) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(27) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn to Wednesday, September 16,
1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of
reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting
the 1992-93 sewer service charges and consideration of
ordinance to increase sewer service charges, if necessary.
-11-
9/09/92
(28) DISTRICT 13
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(29) DISTRICT 13
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(30) DISTRICT 14
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(31) DISTRICT 14
Consideration of motion.to adjourn
-12-
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
September 9, 1992 at 7:30 p.m.
P.O. Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non -routine
items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise
self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material
summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS
9(a): AWARD PURCHASE OF MICROCOMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND ASSOCIATED
PERIPHERALS, SPECIFICATION NO. E-219.
In 1981, prior to the emergence of personal computers (PCs), the
Districts purchased a then state-of-the-art CPT word processing system to
provide stand-alone word processing capabilities to begin the implementation of
office automation. When originally acquired, the CPT system was utilized by all
departments. Over the past few years, most applications have been replaced and
supplemented by an extensive network of PCs. The technology upon which the CPT
system is based is now antiquated, and spare parts are becoming increasingly
difficult to obtain. There is, at present, only one remaining source for these
spare parts, and the prices continue to rise. Districts' staff does not possess
the skills or parts to be able to maintain these older machines. Finally, the
older technology of the CPT system does not allow it to interface with our seven
more modern PC system networks (221 work stations) and software.
The Districts' Information Services Division has, therefore, recommended
that the eleven -station CPT system be replaced. Staff has studied various
options during the past year and has suggested replacing each work station with
an IBM-compatible PC utilizing the most widely used word processing software
application package available, WordPerfect. These systems would be easily
maintained by Districts' staff. Spare parts are already being inventoried at
the Districts for other computer systems of the same type as that being proposed
to replace the CPT system. These systems and their spare parts can be obtained
from numerous sources allowing for savings resulting from competitive pricing.
September 9, 1992
Information Services has configured the recommended systems to closely
approximate the functionality of the CPT system being replaced and expedite the 140-01
transition for remaining staff. All of the new computers will be linked
together to an existing file server which presently possesses more than
sufficient capacity for the document creation and storage needs of the CPT
system being replaced.
A total of eleven (11) new systems are needed, together with related
peripherals and equipment. These systems will be allocated as follows:
Use
Quantity
General Manager's Secretarial Staff 2
Board Secretary 1
Board Secretarial Staff 2
Director of Engineering's Secretary 1
Engineering Department Planning and Design
Secretarial Staff 2
Engineering Department Construction Management
Secretarial Staff 3
11
Sealed bids were opened August 25, 1992. Of the thirteen bids received,
eleven vendors bid on all seventeen items. Two vendors submitted "no -bid"
responses.
Staff recommends award of Specification No. E-219, Purchase of
Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals, to Golden Star
Technology, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, for a total of $55,853.00 plus
sales tax. Sufficient funds are budgeted for this acquisition.
9(b): AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE TABLETOP OPTIMA TL ULTRACENTRIFUGE,
SPECIFICATION NO. E-220.
The Molecular Microbiology Section of the Laboratory is developing and
utilizing state-of-the-art techniques that can be widely applied in the
detection of indicator or disease -causing microorganisms in treated wastewater
and other environmental media samples. Ultra -high-speed centrifugation is an
essential step in the final purification of viral samples before they are
analyzed. The purification of the samples requires a spinning force that is
100,000 times greater than gravity (100,000 x g). The Laboratory's existing
high-speed centrifuge is capable of producing forces of only 20,000 x g. Only
an ultracentrifuge has the capability to achieve the centripetal force required
to process the virus, bacterial nucleic acid, or protein samples.
Beckman Instruments, Inc. is the only vendor who manufacturers an
ultracentrifuge which obtains the necessary speed and offers the
imbalance -tolerance safety feature. The proposed Beckman tabletop
ultracentrifuge produces the force necessary to conduct the work and offers the
safety feature of imbalance -tolerance, a recently developed and important
feature which protects laboratory personnel. Like the spin cycle in a washing
-2-
September 9, 1992
machine, if a load imbalance is sensed, the ultracentrifuge shuts itself off
rather than wobbling uncontrollably and causing damage or injury. Additionally,
this tabletop ultracentrifuge achieves forces of 625,000 x g which can speed the
nucleic acid and protein separations. Further, Beckman Instruments is the only
manufacturer of a compact tabletop ultracentrifuge requiring 120 volts;
consequently, the instrument is easily located. Beckman's price includes finely
balanced rotors that are placed in it and the tube sealer required for test tube
preparation, installation and shipping, and incorporates the drive in its
expanded warranty service agreement.
Staff therefore recommends purchase of One Tabletop Optima TL
Ultracentrifuge, Specification No. E-220, from Beckman Instruments, Inc., in the
amount of $42,966.00, plus sales tax.
9(c): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 TO CENTRAL LABORATORY, CONTRACT NO. J-17.
Job No. J-17, Central Laboratory, provides for the construction of a new
laboratory, upgrading of the site paving, and provisions for additional parking
at a cost of $8 million. Change Order No. 12 is an addition of $58,714.00 and
72 days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for 15 items of
additional work.
Item 1, in the amount of $1,282.00, is for additional structural support
for two air conditioner units. The contract drawings did not show all of the
structural steel necessary to support the specified air conditioner units.
Item 2 for $1,218.00 provides for the upgrade of exhaust fans EF-1, EF-7, and
EF-8 from specified epoxy coated to fiberglass reinforced plastic. The upgrade
was recommended due to the corrosive nature of the exhaust. Item 3, in the
amount of $1,992.00, is for double studding of radius walls of stairs No. 1 and
No. 3. This work is necessary due to a dimensional error between the structural
and architectural drawings. Item 4, in the amount of $1,469.00, involves
removing and replacing damaged asphalt paving which was located next to a
utility excavation through the auto shop parking lot. The previously damaged
asphalt paving was not shown to be replaced on the contract drawings as it was
not part of the original job.
Item 5, for $6,500.00, provides for additional structural supports for
the elevator. The added supports were required by the State Elevator Inspector.
Item 6, in the amount of $1,279.00, is for sheet metal covers for four air
conditioner unit platforms. The covers are necessary to protect against water
leakage through the platform into the building. Item 7 is for the recalculation
and resurvey of the curb at the sample -drop turnout, at a cost of $956.00. This
was due to an error in the curve data on the contract drawings.
Item 8, in the amount of $13,140.00 and seven calendar days, is for the
furring of walls, columns, and steel posts in eleven rooms and providing a
stainless steel cap for sills and ceramic tile for the window jambs of one room.
Furring of walls and columns is required for casework to line up, otherwise if
would have to be notched around columns. The stainless steel cap and ceramic
tile is for reduced maintenance.
Item 9, a net addition in the amount
is for the deletion of asphalt paving, curb,
and revisions to the loading dock, concrete
of $9,694.00 and 20 calendar days,
and gutter from the contract work
ramp, six-foot cross gutter, front
5911
September 9, 1992
entry sidewalk and handicap ramp. An additional handicap ramp was added along
with a bollard, wire mesh at rear sidewalk, exterior plaster modifications and
the addition of a 3/4-inch channel screed at two locations on the north side of
the buildings. The revisions are required in order to comply with the Americans
with Disabilities Act, Title 24, Access to Public Buildings.
Item 10, in the amount of $6,622.00 and 14 calendar days, is for the
modification of the gravity conveyors, dish sink and hood in Room 118.
The Contractor was also directed to fabricate and install stainless steel
support legs for the hood and 316 stainless steel valve handle guide for the
dish sink. The rework was necessary because of incomplete information on
specified equipment. (As part of the payment negotiations, no profit or
overhead is included in this work.)
Item 11, in the amount of $1,548.00 (which excludes profit) and one
calendar day, provides for four additional chases to conceal power, telephone,
and data conduit to the island laboratory bench tops from the second floor
ceiling. Item 12, in the amount of $1,074.00 and three calendar days, is for
the additional framing and drywall required for the fire -rated wall in the
soffit area above Rooms 234 and 236. This work was necessary as there was not
enough clearance in the soffit to allow for the HVAC ductwork and maintain the
one -hour fire rating required for the corridor. Item 13, in the amount of
$1,617.00 and seven calendar days, is for fabricating and installing additional
velocity stacks for exhaust fans EF-3, EF-5, EF-6, EF-8, and EF-13. There was a
dimensional error and only two stacks were called out when a total of seven were
needed. Item 14, for $2,905.00 (which excludes profit), provides for an
upgraded exhaust fan for EF-9. The system requires a specialized unit to ,W,
exhaust combustible fumes.
Item 15, in the amount of $7,418.00 and 20 calendar days, is for the
modification of three exhaust air systems, EF-3, EF-4, and EF-5. This was
recommended by the consultant as the most economical means to achieve the static
pressures in the systems due to the changes in exhaust air conditions required
under Change Order No. 5. At the time Change Order No. 5 was negotiated, it was
unknown if the exhaust systems would require modifications to achieve the static
pressures. Of the twelve exhaust air systems, these three fans could not be
readjusted to meet the requirements.
With the exception of Item 14, the above -described changes would have
been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase.
Items 1, 3, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 13 include design errors in staff's opinion and
cost recovery will be negotiated with the consultant. If the Directors approve
this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract
will be $1,011,639.55 and 386 calendar days time extension. This represents an
increase of 14.2% over the original contract amount. This includes $585,000
approved to date for reconfiguration of the Central Laboratory to accommodate
new laboratory functions. The work is nearly complete; it is expected that
additional laboratory changes will add approximately $50,000 to $55,000 to the
above amount.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 12 for an addition of
$58,714.00 and 72 calendar days to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation.
-4-
September 9, 1992
9(d): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 13 TO CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT
PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. J-19-1.
`-01 Job No. J-19-1, Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, is part
of the $66 million master -planned Central Power Generation System which is
being built under several contracts at both plants. This $15.9 million
contract includes installation of three pre -purchased digester gas burning,
spark -ignited, 3472 horsepower engines with generators which are each capable
of producing 2500 KW of electrical power. Change Order No. 13 is an addition
of $46,279.00 to the contract for five items of additional work.
Item 1, in the amount of $18,550.00, is for providing junction boxes,
wiring, and conduit to supply power for emergency light fixtures not included
in the contract documents. Item 2, in the amount of $18,191.00, is for
providing conduit, wire, terminations, and testing for additional power,
control, and signal circuits for the Districts' -supplied equipment not included
in the contract documents. Item 3, in the amount of $4,014.00, is for
providing an access ladder, receptacle, light fixture, and switch in the
elevator shaft which are required by the State Elevator Code to provide safe
access and working conditions, omitted in the contract documents.
Item 4, in the amount of $1,921.00, is for adding push -buttons,
indicating lights, and terminal boards to the engine status panel which are
required to make this contractor -furnished control panel compatible with the
Districts' -supplied equipment. These control panel features were omitted in
the contract documents. Item 5, in the amount of $3,603.00, is for providing
support lintels for three glass block windows and widening window openings at
the Central Power Generation Building entrance door to allow room for glass
block expansion joints. The height of these windows exceed the allowable
unsupported height specified in the building code and support lintels are
required. The supports were omitted in the contract drawings.
Except for Item 5, the above described changes would have been included
in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. A portion
of Item 5 involves rework and the appropriate cost will be negotiated with the
designer. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the
change orders to date on this contract will be $514,684.00 and 103 calendar
days time extension. This represents an increase of 3.3% over the original
contract amount.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 13 for an addition of
$34,279.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation. There is no time
extension associated with this change order.
9(e): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 13 TO CONSTRUCTION OF DIGESTERS NOS.
11-16 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-3; REHABILITATION OF
DIGESTERS 9 AND 10 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-35-2; AND
INSTALLATION OF WASTE DIGESTER GAS FLARE FACILITIES AT PLANTS 1 AND 2,
JOB NO. J-21.
This $27.8 million project includes the construction of new Digesters
11-16 (Job No. P1-34-3), the rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 (Job No.
PI-35-2) and the construction of new digester gas flare facilities at Plants 1
and 2 (Job No. J-21). Change Order No. 13 adds $15,957.00 for two items of
-� additional work to Job No. P1-34-3.
-5-
September 9, 1992
Item 1, for $6,105.00, involves piping modifications to the low pressure
digester gas piping located on the walls of Control Building 11-14. The
modifications were required to avoid conflict with HVAC equipment shown on the
contract plans in the same area. Item 2 makes pipe support changes to the
digester gas piping on the roofs of the two control buildings for $9,852.00.
The specified pipe support required revisions to allow for piping clearance over
a parapet wall and maintaining the necessary slope of the pipe invert for
condensation drainage.
The above -described changes would have been included in the original
design if discovered or known in the design phase and are not for replaced work.
If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders
to date on this contract will be $632,315.54 and 27 calendar days time
extension. This represents an increase of 2.3% over the original contract
amount.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 13 for an addition of
$15,957.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. There is no time
extension associated with this change order.
9(f): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 TO ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP DRIVES AT PLANT
NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-42-1.
Job No. P2-42-1 at Plant No. 2 is a $9.4 million project that includes
the replacement of thirteen existing internal combustion engines and three
existing electric motors, replacement of existing influent pumps and
construction of a power building for variable frequency drive equipment. Change
Order No. 5 is an addition of $17,689.00 to the contract for six items of
additional work.
Item 1 required the disconnecting and reconnecting of a previously
assembled electric motor to accommodate maintenance by the Districts on an
existing pump at a cost of $1,840.00. Item 2, in the amount of $411.00, was to
relocate power for the harmonic filter control from one panel to another of GOBS
Pumps 3, 4, and 5 to assure that in a power failure all pumps would not be
affected. Item 3, in the amount of $4,875.00, was to replace ten pressure
switches for regulating the flow of pump seal water because they would not work
properly with the plant water. Item 4 was the addition of electric motor shaft
lubricating oil controllers at a cost of $1,422.00. Item 5 was the removal of
existing engine and auxiliary equipment concrete pads that were operation and
maintenance obstructions at a cost of $8,252.00. Item 6 was the replacement of
lighting fixture ballast housings due to a drawing error at a cost of $889.00.
Items 1, 4, and 5 would have been included in the original design if
discovered or known in the design phase. Items 2, 3, and 6 include costs
resulting from design errors for which partial reimbursement is appropriate and
will be negotiated with the design engineer. If the Directors approve this
change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will
be $116,410.00 and zero calendar days time extension. This represents an
increase of 1.2% over the original contract amount.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 5 for an addition of
$17,689.00 to the contract with Ziebarth 8 Alper and C. S. Alper Construction
Co. There is no time extension associated with this change order.
ff:M
September 9, 1992
9(g): APPROVAL OF ADDENDA NOS. 1, 2, 3, AND 4 AND AWARD OF PUMP STATION
TELEMETRY AND MONITORING SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-28.
In January, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Job
No. J-28 which replaces the telemetry in two plant and twenty-nine outlying
collection system pump stations. (Since approval, telemetry for five stations
was deleted.) The existing telemetry which was installed over twenty years ago
has become generally unreliable and many spare parts are no longer available.
As recommended by the Master Plan, improved telemetry and monitoring will
significantly reduce the chances of sewage overflows. The upgraded
installations, designed by staff, will provide continuous information on the
status of each critical pump station, maintain records for preventive
maintenance and allow for future remote control.
(1) Addendum No. 1
Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications changes the bid
opening date from June 9, 1992 to July 7, 1992.
(2) Addendum No. 2
Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications changes the bid
opening date from July 7, 1992 to August 4, 1992.
(3) Addendum No. 3
Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications deletes telemetry for
three pump stations (which are planned to be abandoned) from the project;
changes five non -critical pump stations to an autodialer system; deletes
the following; a) uninterruptible power supply from seventeen pump
stations, b) a one-year maintenance contract, c) pressure transducers
(they will be installed by staff), and d) a control room overhead
projector; reduces the quantity of graphic displays and training hours;
adds factory testing requirements, and makes minor changes to procedural
requirements and technical details.
(4) Addendum No. 4
Addendum No. 4 to the plans and specifications deletes the
Wastehauler Pump Station from the project, allows bids from
contractors with Class A licenses and revises equipment locations in
four pump stations.
(5)
Award of Contract
On August 4, 1992, five bids were received for the Pump Station
Telemetry and Monitoring Systems, Job No. J-28. The bids ranged from a
high of $607,500.00 to a low of $374,100.00, submitted by Domar Electric,
Inc. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda
material.
Staff recommends award to Domar Electric, Inc. for their low bid
amount of $374,100.00. The engineer's estimate was $400,000.00.
-7-
September 9, 1992
9(h): APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE
ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR WASTEWATER QUALITY, DIVERSION AND TREATMENT
STUDY.
In July 1991, the Directors approved a professional services agreement
with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the preparation of a wastewater quality,
diversion and treatment study to investigate the quality of upper basin
tributary waters and determine the impact on the Districts' treatment processes.
The study reviews the present and anticipated future quality of the Santa Ana
River Interceptor (SARI) wastewater, compares it to other trunklines, evaluates
current trunkline diversion and water reclamation strategies, and recommends
future trunkline diversion strategies. The goal is to ensure a high quality
Plant No. 1 effluent for reclamation, and maximum flexibility in operating and
managing the Districts' sewerage system.
Boyle Engineering Corporation is in the process of completing the report
and it has become apparent that the budget amounts originally designated for the
various work categories require adjusting to more closely reflect the actual
effort required. Therefore, staff is recommending that Addendum No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation be approved,
providing for reallocation of funds at no increase in the total contract amount,
as follows:
Proposed
Existing
Proposed
Revised
Agreement
Addn. No. 1
Agreement
Direct Labor, (hourly
rates including labor
plus overhead at 153%),
not to exceed
$71,160
$6,031
$77,191
Direct Expenses, at cost,
not to exceed
8,000
(6,031)
1,969
Fixed Profit
8,895
0
8,895
Total, not to exceed
$88,055
0
S88,055
The action appearing on the agenda is to adopt a resolution approving
Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering
Corporation providing for a reallocation of funds at no increase in the total
contract amount. A copy of the resolution is attached with the agenda
supporting documents.
DISTRICT 2
9(i): APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR NEW EASEMENT WITH OWNER OF PARKSIDE APARTMENT
COMPLEX RE RELOCATION OF CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER AND QUITCLAIMING
OLD EASEMENT.
The Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9, was completed in
February 1961 from Yorba Linda Boulevard to Imperial Highway following the
natural drainage pattern of the area. The pipe, installed in the low-lying area
September 9, 1992
of the drainage course, is an 18-inch VCP in the lower reach and a 15-inch
VCP in the upper reach. A portion of the pipe on the west side of the Orange
Freeway and north of Bastanchury Road meanders through the Parkside Apartment
complex within an easement granted to the District prior to construction.
This portion has required emergency repairs in two locations and maintenance
capabilities are limited by both development and lack of access easements.
Sags in the line within the apartment complex have developed and the line is
cracked and in danger of collapse.
In October 1990, the Directors authorized preparation of a project report
to review the status of the line. The project report recommended relocation of
the subtrunk sewer through the Parkside Apartments to a new location in private
driveways and alleys. A design contract was awarded by the Directors in August
1992 to prepare plans and specifications for the relocation.
The owner of the Parkside Apartments has agreed to dedicate a new
easement at no cost to District 2, including a temporary construction easement.
District 2, in turn, will quitclaim the old easement upon completion of the
necessary construction, and will connect the complex to the relocated line.
The action appearing on the agenda is to approve the easement agreement with the
owner of the Parkside Apartment complex. Staff recommends approval.
DISTRICT 14
9(j): RECEIVE, FILE AND INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION NO. 1--SAN JOAQUIN
HILLS ROAD ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14.
The District has received a request from The Irvine Company to annex
54.52 acres of territory located in the vicinity of the northwest corner of San
Joaquin Hills Road and Newport Coast Drive in unincorporated County territory.
This property is uninhabitated. The annexation is in accordance with the terms
of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB 8 tax exchanges for
annexing properties. The local sewering agency is the Irvine Ranch Water
District.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution attached to the agenda
material initiating proceedings for said Annexation No. 1.
***END OF CONSENT CALENDAR***
ALL DISTRICTS
11. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE.
The Fiscal Policy Committee met on September 2, 1992. Enclosed for the
Directors is a written report on the Committee's deliberations and its
recommended actions for consideration by the Boards.
-9-
September 9, 1992
12: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION.
From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed
session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending
litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public
disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a
situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda,
this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed
session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards.
JWS:jt
ay lvester
eral pager
-10-
111..✓
1-U
Elm
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
September 2, 1992 of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1CS44 ELLIS AVENUE
P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 9272B-6127
REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE (714)982-2411
Meeting Date: September 2, 1992
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Director William Mahoney, Joint Chairman
James V. Evans Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
Don Griffin Steve Coma, Merrill Lynch
Evelyn Hart Melissa Waters, Merrill Lynch
Iry Pickler Steve Cole, Mudge Rose
Peer Swan
James Wahner
Grace Winchell STAFF PRESENT:
J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
ABSENT: Blake Anderson, Director of Technical
Services
John Gullixson Thomas Dawes, Director of Engineering
Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel
Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of
Maintenance
Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of
Operations
Dan Dillon, Accounting Manager
Patti Gorczyca, Financial Manager
1) Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Series "C" Certificates of
on*M^n+:nn trniax C4nnn^4nn
Staff reported that Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 & 11 successfully
negotiated sale of the $98,500,000, 25-year, variable rate Certificates of
Participation Series "C" issue on September 1, 1992. The issuance was backed
by a Standby Bond Purchase Agreement provided by Federal Guaranty Insurance
Company Securities Purchase, Inc., as well as Municipal Bond New Issue Insurance
provided by Federal Guaranty Issuance Company. The ratings assigned to the
issue were AAA/A-1+ by Standard and Poor's Corporation and Aaa/VMIG1 by Moody's
Investors Service.
The proceeds from this financing are being used to finance the cost of
acquisition and construction of various capital projects, which consist of
certain jointly owned sewage treatment and disposal facilities and certain trunk
sewer lines owned by Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 11. Additional proceeds
will be used to reimburse the participating Districts for the cost of
individually owned trunk sewer lines and jointly owned sewage treatment and
disposal facilities.
Staff summarized the terms of the issue's final structure and the market
conditions during the issue's pricing. Based on market conditions, the then
pending California State budget and subsequent note issuance, and the Districts'
(1 of 8)
Fiscal Policy Committee Report
September 2, 1992
.-
need for capital, the financing team chose to implement a variable rate
financing (daily reset) and selected a September 1 date to price and sell the
certificates as previously authorized by the Boards. Staff reported that the
issue closed with an initial rate of 2.70%.
Enclosed is a pricing book summarizing information pertaining to the
Series "C" COP transaction.
2) User Fee Increases to Make
Districts' Property Taxes.
3 for the State's Confiscati
Staff reported that earlier that day the Governor had signed a compromise
budget submitted by the State Legislature which includes a $375 million
state-wide property tax shift from special districts to the State to help
finance their Proposition 98 school funding obligations.
The State's budget provides that 35% of special districts' property tax
revenues, not to exceed 10% of total revenues, will be shifted. What
constitutes total revenues has not been fully defined yet so we are not sure
whether it will be a factor, but there's a possibility that the 10% limit could
help some Districts. However, if the 10% cap precludes a total state-wide shift
of $375 million, then the county auditors are authorized to shift up to an
additional 5% (ie., a total of 40%) of the special districts' property taxes.
Following is a table reflecting each District's maximum tax loss under both
scenarios, which total $12.0 million and $13.7 million, respectively; and tables
showing the impact of both the 35% and the 40% shift on Districts' user fees, in
the event the Directors elect to replace the property tax shortfall by increasing
user fees in 1992-93:
1992-93 PROPERTY TAX LOSS
Current Tax 35% Tax 40% Tax
DISTRICT Revenue Loss Loss
1 $ 2,060,000 ($721,000) ($824,000)
2 9,105,000 (3,186,750) (3,642,000)
3
11,665,000
(4,082,750)
(4,666,000)
5
2,816,000
(985,600)
(1,126,400)
6
1,467,000
(513,450)
(586,800)
7
4,430,000.
(1,550,500)
(1,772,000)
11
2,652,000
(928,200)
(12060,800)
Total
$34,195,000
($11,968,250)
($13,678,000)
(2 of 8)
Fiscal Policy Committee Report
September 2, 1992
1992-93 S.F.R. USER FEE ADJUSTMENTS
Required to Replace 35%
Property Tax Shift
(7/1-10/15/92) (10/16/92-6/30/93)
Current
Proposed
Annual Fee
Total
Current
1992-93
1992-93
Increase
Revised
1992-93
Pro -Rated
Pro -Rated
1992-93
1992-93
DISTRICT
SFR Fee
SFR Fee
SFR Fee
SFR Fee
SFR Fee
1
$75.00
$21.88
$62.88
$ 9.76
$ 84.76
2
60.00
17.50
54.58
12.08
72.08
3
60.00
17.50
57.04
14.54
74.54
5
75.00
21.88
90.27
37.15
112.15
6
65.00
18.96
58.03
11.99
76.99
7
40.00
11.67
43.96
15.63
55.63
11
60.00
17.50
60.73
18.23
78.23
1992-93 S.F.R. USER FEE ADJUSTMENTS
Required to Replace 40%
Property Tax Shift
(7/1-10/15/92) (10/16/92-6/30/93)
Current
Proposed
Annual Fee
Total
Current
1992-93
1992-93
Increase
Revised
1992-93
Pro -Rated
Pro -Rated
1992-93
1992-93
DISTRICT
SFR Fee
SFR Fee
SFR Fee
SFR Fee
SFR Fee
1
$75.00
$21.88
$64.28
$11.16
$ 86.16
2
60.00
17.50
56.31
13.81
73.81
3
60.00
17.50
59.12
16.62
76.62
5
75.00
21.88
95.58
42.46
117.46
6
65.00
18.96
59.74
13.70
78.70
7
40.00
11.67
46.19
17.86
57.86
11
60.00
17.50
63.34
20.84
80.84
(3 of 8)
Fiscal Policy Committee Report
September 2, 1992
Staff clarified differences between the final adopted State budget and
earlier versions. The original proposal by the Governor would have shifted
$347 million state-wide and 100%, or $34.2 million, of the Districts' property
tax revenue to the schools. The final budget shifts $375 million, but only
35-40% of special districts' property tax revenue. The difference is the
original $347 million proposal applied only to enterprise special districts,
whereas the $375 million final budget shift applies to all special districts.
It was also pointed out that the Governor and State Legislators have
claimed that they are really not taking any tax monies from special districts
since the State provided bailout/special district augmentation funding (SDAF)
following Proposition 13; and they argue that consequently they are now merely
shifting what has heretofore been a "windfall" for special districts. In the
case of the Orange County Sanitation Districts, that is simply a hollow claim.
Our Districts never received State bailout funds following Proposition 13, nor
have we ever received any SDAF monies since Proposition 13 was implemented. The
only property taxes that we have ever received are the historical share of the
property tax that we have been entitled to all along. The POTW community
vigorously argued that point but the concerns expressed by local government
were, for the most part, not well received by the Sacramento majority. We were,
however, able to defeat a proposal to fund the State Water Resources Control
Board activities by leveying a fee on NPDES Permits that would have cost our
Districts between $750,000 and $2.5 million. This proposal has been floated
each of the past few years at budget time and so far we have been able to defeat
it.
The Districts collect their annual user fees on the property tax bill as it
is the most cost-effective way to do it. As previously reported to the Boards,
the Districts were required to submit the 1992-93 user fees (which were
previously adopted by the Boards at the same rates as for 1991-92) by August
24th in order to meet the County Auditor's deadline for placing them on the
property tax bill for 1992-93. Accordingly, we submitted the required
information to the County Auditor by the deadline. An additional provision in
the State's budget action now allows special districts to submit fee information
for collection on the tax bill to the County Auditor up to October 1st.
At one time the State was considering waiving the public notice and hearing
procedures for fee increases caused as a result of the State's property tax
shift from special districts to the schools because of the time restraints for
implementing changes; however, that did not occur. Staff reported that if it
is the Boards' decision to increase 1992-93 user fees to make up for the
property tax loss, it could be accomplished by the October 1st deadline as set
forth in the following time table:
(4 of 8)/
k
n
Fiscal Policy Committee Report
September 2, 1992
Time Table for Adjusting 1992-93 User Fees
September 2 - Consideration and guidance by Fiscal Policy Committee
September 8 - Publish notice of proposed user fee increase and
public hearing on September 16th
September 9 - Joint Board meeting to consider recommendations of
Fiscal Policy Committee
Declare CEQA Exemption
Introduction and first reading of ordinance adjusting
user fees for 1992-93
Fix public hearing for Wednesday, September 16th
at 7:30 p.m.
Adjourn Joint Boards to September 16th
September 15 - Second publication of notice of proposed user fee
increase and public hearing
September 16 - Adjourned Joint Board meeting
Second reading and consideration of adoption of user
fee increase ordinance
Direct County Auditor to collect the fees on property
tax bill
October 1 - File revised 1992-93 user fee rate computer tapes
with County Auditor
October 16 New user fees take effect
1''J (5 of 8)
Fiscal Policy Committee Report
September 2, 1992
Also discussed were potential impacts of possibly reduced assessed
valuations because of the current state of the economy. Preliminary information
indicates that values are up in all Districts. There is also language in the
State's budget act relating to possible exemption from seizure of property taxes
committed to debt service. As the Directors are aware that the Boards have
previously adopted a resolution so declaring major portions of our property
taxes because of the Districts' debt financing capital program and the
anticipated inclusion of this provision in the law. Finally, there are some
organizations questioning the constitutionality of the State's action and
considering bringing suit. The General Counsel is continuing to review these
two latter items and will report back.
The Committee entered into a lengthy discussion of the impacts on the
Districts of the property tax shift ordered by the Governor and State
Legislature. The alternatives for making up the $12.0 - $13.7 million property
tax loss are summarized in the enclosed staff reports dated September 1, 1992
(tan), August 18, 1992 (white) and August 13, 1992 (gray).
One option is issuance of short-term notes similar to tax revenue
anticipation notes (TRANS), which is a fairly common practice by many
governmental agencies to provide cash -flow funding pending receipt of annual
property taxes and which often results in net arbitrage earnings to the agency.
The Districts have considered TRANS in the past but it was determined by bond
counsel that they could not be utilized because of the Districts' financial
structure. However, because of the state's action in confiscating Districts'
property taxes, bond counsel has now ruled that the Districts could issue
taxable short-term notes as an alternative to raising 1992-93 user fees, and
then raise fees in 1993-94 to make up for both the property tax loss and to pay
off the notes and interest. The Districts could realize as much as $1.7 million
in net arbitrage earnings from such a transaction. It was the consensus of the
Committee that inasmuch as there is a strong likelihood that the state will
ultimately take all of the Districts' property taxes (see copy of enclosed
September 1, 1992 letter from Senator Marian Bergeson [ivory]) that delaying
user fee increases would mean that next year the rate increase would probably
have to be about double what it would otherwise be, and that such an adjustment
would be considerably more difficult to deal with and explain.
Use of existing reserves is another option that could be used to offset
the 1992-93 property tax loss. However, dipping into reserves would actually
exacerbate the property tax loss problem because the Districts would also lose
interest earnings on those reserves that would be depleted. Further, the
current reserve strategy is a major reason that the Districts enjoy an extremely
favorable reputation and position in the bond market which saves millions of
dollars in debt service interest. Lastly, because of the very nature of
expansive wastewater treatment activities, a strong reserve position is
absolutely essential in assuring that the Districts will be able to weather
major emergency situations or other crises.
The Committee discussed at great length the matter of further budgetary
cuts. It was pointed out that in putting together the 1992-93 budgets, the
Committee recognized the current state of the economy and the possibility that
Districts' property taxes could be reduced or taken altogether, and therefore
29
M
(6 of 8)
Fiscal Policy Committee Report
September 2, 1992
sharpened the budget pencil and cut it by $54.2 million under the 1991-92
budget. This was accomplished in spite of the fact that Districts' costs of
operation continue to rise because of the added costs of complying with
regulatory requirements, both air quality and water quality, and costs
associated with increasing sewerage flows resulting from ongoing development and
population increases. Part of the costs associated with these two are, of
course, the expenses necessary for operating and maintaining the approximately
$100 million in new facilities that are placed into service each year. The
impacts of inflation also affect our costs. It was noted that due to the
probable delay in starting up central generation we anticipate running over the
budget because we will not realize the full electrical cost savings anticipated
with an earlier start-up.
It was also noted that there are few discretionary expenditures in
operating wastewater treatment facilities. Although some further operating
budget cuts could be made, any meaningful reductions would impair our operating
and maintenance capabilities for processing 230 million -gallons -per -day, and
thus jeopardize our ability to keep the collection, treatment and disposal
facilities in a state of repair that enables us to continuously comply with
regulatory requirements and protect public health, the marine environment and
the beaches.
Research and development is an example of what might be considered
discretionary, and there are some others. But, it was observed, Districts'
research and development is directed towards the goals of finding better and
more efficient ways of doing things, and assuring that the public's health and
the environment are being adequately protected. The same can be said of such
activities as our involvement in legislative and regulatory affairs which is to
bring some rationality to laws and regulations that will, in the long run, save
millions of dollars.
It is the consensus of the Committee that the staff and the Boards of
Directors had, in response to the current state of the economy and in
anticipation of reductions in the Districts' property taxes by the State, already
acted in an earnest and responsible manner by cutting $54.2 million from the
1992-93 budget and holding 1992-93 fees at the same level as 1991-92; and that
further 1992-93 budget cuts would jeopardize the integrity and quality of the
Districts' wastewater management program and the Boards' level of service
commitment to the citizens, communities and the coastal cities for the
protection of public health and the environment. The Committee was also
concerned that further cutbacks would jeopardize the Districts' 301(h) Waiver
NPDES Permit which saves the citizens of Orange County $50 million a year.
However, the Members also agreed that the Fiscal Policy Committee and staff
should continue to work together to consider potential future opportunities for
budgetary savings and operational economies.
For the reasons enumerated above, it is the consensus of the Committee
that the action of the Governor and State Legislature in confiscating up to
$13.7 (40%) million of the Districts annual property tax, and the likelihood that
the State will eventually take 100% or ($34.2 million) of the Districts' annual
property taxes, the Directors have no viable alternative but to raise user fees
(7 of 8)
Fiscal Policy Committee Report
September 2, 1992
to make up for the loss. The Committee also feels quite strongly that the
Districts should put together a public information program to inform citizens
that this action is necessary only because of the State's seizure of local
property taxes, ie., to lay the blame exactly where it belongs, at the feet of
the Governor and Members of the State Legislature.
Recommendations: The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends:
a) That the Districts' 1992-93 user fees be increased, in accordance with
the time table hereinabove set forth, to make up for the minimum 35%
confiscation of Districts' property taxes by the State of California,
as follows:
1992-93 S.F.R. USER FEE ADJUSTMENTS
(7/1-10/15/92)
Current
Current 1992-93
1992-93 Pro -Rated
DISTRICT SFR Fee SFR Fee
(10/16/92-6/30/93)
Proposed
1992-93
Pro -Rated
SFR Fee
Annual Fee Total
Increase Revised
1992-93 1992-93
SFR Fee SFR Fee
1
$75.00
$21.88
$62.88
$ 9.76
$ 84.76
2
60.00
17.50
54.58
12.08
72.08
3
60.00
17.50
57.04
14.54
74.54
5
75.00
21.88
90.27
37.15
112.15
6
65.00
18.96
58.03
11.99
76.99
7
40.00
11.67
43.96
15.63
55.63
11
60.00
17.50
60.73
18.23
78.23
This recommendation is made with the understanding that not all of the
information pertaining to the impact of the State's budget act is yet
available, ie., definition of total revenue vis-a-vis application of the
1004 cap provision, and new assessed valuations; and that if forthcoming
information prior to the Boards' scheduled consideration of the fee
adjustments on September 16th indicates that the required increase would be
less, then the proposed fees could be adjusted accordingly on that date.
b) That the staff be directed to develop and implement a public information
program explaining the need to raise Districts' sanitary sewer service
charges to recover property taxes confiscated by the State as a result of
the action of the Governor and State Legislature, that will initially take
up to 40% of the Districts' annual property taxes.
JWS:sc
V3
Enclosures
(8 of 8)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
September 1, 1992
SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
P o eox 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-B127
(714) 962-2411
Subject: State Shift of Districts Property Taxes and Options to Make Up Lost Property Taxes
The August 18, 1992 Staff Report to the Fiscal Policy Committee identified three options for
replacing lost property taxes including:
1) Further budgetary cuts
2) Use of Reserves
3) Increased User Fees
Because of the impact of the State's property tax shift we have been discussing the issues with
bond counsel and there now appears to be a fourth alternative because of the State's action.
Bond counsel has advised us that a short-term or interim borrowing is now an option, Short
term borrowings usually referred to as notes, are a common funding mechanism used by
municipal entities. The committee may recall that it considered staff and bond counsel reports
on the potential issuance of notes by the Districts' at its September and October 1991 meetings.
At that time it was determined that the Districts' could not proceed with the issuance of notes
because the Districts could not provide sufficient legal justification necessary to demonstrate the
cash flow deficit requirements supporting the issuance of interim tax-exempt notes, pursuant to
federal law. Staff has since asked Districts' special counsel to review whether the Districts
could issue notes to provide replacement funding for those property tax revenues reallocated to
the State until the Districts obtained increased user fees. Special counsel concluded that the
Districts could issue a short term borrowing if done on a taxable basis, given the strength of the
Districts' reserves.
The following outlines the benefits of such a note structure and how it would be implemented
for the specified purpose of bridging the short term loss of Ad Valorem revenues.
Benefits
• Allows for delay of user fee increase until normal tax cycle (November of 1993).
• Allows reserves to remain untapped, preserving investment income at taxable yields.
• Permits greater flexibility and time to determine long term policy of replacing Ad
Valorem revenues.
0 Allows proceeds of the notes to be invested at a yield in excess of the yield on the notes.
Structure
• Taxable notes would be issued by the Districts. The taxable structure would be used to
avoid certain IRS restrictions.
• Proceeds from the sale of notes would be used to substitute for Ad Valorem receipts
when such revenues would have become available.
• Principal and interest on the notes would be paid from increased user fees, due in
December of 1993, and excess interest earnings on reserves.
Timetable
The notes should be structured and marketed prior to the first Ad Valorem revenues shortfall
during November 1992.
Interest Earnings Results
Attached is a cash flow analysis illustrating the magnitude of net interest earnings possible
assuming a worst case 40% Ad Valorem loss. The cash flow analysis presents an Option 1
corresponding to a reserves draw to fund the Ad Valorem shortfall and Option 2 representing
the issuance of notes. As indicated, the Option 2 presents a net interest earnings to the Districts
of approximately $1,789,588.
The cash flow analysis' assumptions are noted by footnotes but both assume a roll over of the
initial one year notes to allow debt repayment after increased user fee revenues are available
commencing November 1993.
District staff and financing team will be available at the meeting to present this fourth alternate
and to answer any questions.
MERRILL LYNCH & CO. 09/03/92
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
1 Year Note Analysis
8: 40% Ad Valorem Loss
Option 1
Ad Valorem Revenues Replaced
By Reserve Draws
in December & April
-------------------------------------------------------
9.050%
Reserve
interest Net
Draws to
On Remaining Reserve Fund
Month
------------
Reserves (1)
------------
Fund AV Loss
------------
Reserves (2) Balance
------------ ------------
10/01/92
84,300,000
635,763
11/01/92
84,935,763
640,557
12/01/92
78,736,320
6,840,000
593,803
01/01/93
79,330,123
598,281
02/01/93
79,928,404
60Z,793
03/01/93
80,531,198
607,339
04/01/93
74,298,537
6,840,000
560,335
05/01/93
74,858,872
564,561
06/01/93
75,423,432
568,818
07/01/93
7-5,992,251
573,108
08/01/93
76,565,359
577,430
09/01/93
77,142,789
581,785
10/01/93
77,724,575
5B6,ST3
11/01/93
78,310,747
590,594
12/01/93
78,901,341
595,048
01/01/94
79,496,389
599,535
02/01/94
80,095,924
604,05T
03/01/94
80,699,981
608,612
04/01/94
81,308,593
613,202
05/01/94
81,921,795
617,82T
06/01/94
82,539,622
622,486
07/01/94
83,162,109
627,181
08/01/94
83,789,289
631,911
09/01/94
84,421,200
636,6T7
84,421,200 13,680,000 14,437,877 85,05T,8T7
(1) Assumes Initial Reserves of M .30 KM
(2) July Net Yield in Orange County Commingled Pool
(3) 1 Year T-Bill Rate Plus 80 SP (assumed financing rate)
(4) Note Proceeds Invested in Commingled Pool
Option 2
Ad Valorem Revenues Replaced By Issuance of $13.68 MM Interim Notes
9.050%
Interest
Wet Principal
4.350%
Payout of
9.050%
On Remaining
Reserve Fund on $13.68 MM
interest on
Total
Proceeds to
Interest On
Net
Reserves (1)
------------
Reserves (2)
------------
Balance Interim Votes
------------ ------------
Notes (3)
------------
Debt Service
------------
Replace AV
------------
Proceeds (4)
------------
Debt Service
------------
84,300,000
635,763
49,590
49,590
103,170
(53,580)
84,935,763
640,557
49,590
49,590
103,170
(53,580)
85,576,320
645,3BB
49,590
49,590
6,840,000
51,585
(1,995)
86,221,708
650,255
49,590
49,590
51,585
(1,995)
$6,871,963
655,159
49,590
49,590
51,585
(1,995)
87,527,123
660,100
49,590
49,590
51,585
(1,995)
88,187,223
665,079
49,590
49,590
6,840,000
0
49,590
88,852,302
670,094
49,590
49,590
0
49,590
89,522,396
675,148
49,590
49,590
0
49,590
90,197,544
680,240
49,590
49,590
0
49,590
90,877,784
685,3T0
49,590
49,590
0
49,590
91,563,154
690,539
49,590
49,590
0
49,590
92,253,693
695,747
49,590
49,590
0
49,590
92,949,439
700,994
49,590
49,590
0
49,590
93,650,433
706,280
6,840,000
49,590
6,889,590
0
6,889,590
94,356,713
711,607
24,795
24,795
0
24,T95
95,068,320
716,9T4
24,795
24,795
0
24,795
95,785,294
722,381
24,795
24,795
0
24,795
96,507,6T4
727,829
6,840,000
24,795
6,864,795
0
6,864,795
97,235,503
733,318
0
0
0
0
97,968,821
738,848
0
0
0
0
98,707,669
744,420
0
0
0
D
99,452,089
750,035
0
0
0
0
100,202,124
------------
755,691
0
0
0
0
0
------------
16,657,815
------------ ------------
100,957,815 13,680,000
------------
843,030
------------
14,523,030
------------
13,680,000
------------
412,680
------------
14,110,350
Total Draws
SLWARY:
Reserves
Net D/S
Balance
option 1:
85,057,8T7
0
$5,057,877
option 2:
100,957,815
------------
14,110,350
------------
66,847,465
------------
Net Difference
15,699,938
14,110,350
1,789,588
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
I
u
August 18, 1992
STAFF REPORT
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
(714)962-2411
SUBJECT: State's Proposed Shift of Districts' Property Taxes and Options
to Make Up Lost Property Taxes
As reported to the Directors at the August 12th Board Meeting, the "Budget
Olympics" are continuing in Sacramento as the Governor and Legislature attempt
to resolve the State's budget crisis. As you know, they have proposed to shift
all or a portion of enterprise special districts' property tax revenue to the
State to satisfy the State's obligations to fund schools under Proposition 98.
There are currently two alternative proposals that would affect the Sanitation
Districts.
One is the so-called "Super Pot". Under this alternative all special districts'
tax monies would be put into a single pot. In our case, our total $34.2 million
in property taxes would be transferred. This would total just under $1.7 billion
statewide. Twenty-five percent of that would then be appropriated for the
schools and the balance distributed to special districts in a manner similar to
the current Special District Augmentation Fund (SDAF) monies by County
Supervisors.
The second alternative that is being discussed is a proposal that would take
between 25% and 30% of enterprise special districts' tax revenues and give that
to the schools. In our case, 25% of our total property tax of $34.2 million
would be $8.5 million. We would keep the rest.
Obviously, the Sanitation Districts would prefer the second alternative. But
under any proposal the Boards will be faced with a decision on how to make up
for whatever property taxes are shifted in order to maintain the Districts'
long-term financial integrity.
An important point to remember is that the State will apparently continue to
experience budgetary problems for the foreseeable future. To a large extent,
their approach to solving their budgetary shortfalls has been to raid the
treasuries of local government. Thus, it is clear that if they only succeed in
grabbing a portion of enterprise special districts' property taxes this year, in
all likelihood they will keep coming back for more next year and, ultimately,
all of it in future years. Therefore, sooner or later the Districts will have
to significantly increase user fees, over and above what will be necessary
increases to finance rising costs of providing sewerage services to the
communities we serve, to adequately fund the Districts requirements.
(1 of 6)
Staff Report re ,
State's Proposed Shift of
Districts' Property Taxes/Options
August 18, 1992
There are basically three options for making up lost property taxes:
1. Further budgetary cuts.
2. Use of reserves
3. Increase user fees
These options are discussed in some detail below. Although there are numerous
variations, we have limited our discussion to the three fundamental options to
help focus on the impacts of the loss of the Districts historical share of the
property tax.
1. Further Bud4etary Cuts
Recognizing the current economic situation, in developing the 1992-93 budgets
the Fiscal Policy Committee worked with staff to take a hard look at budgeted
expenditures and determine where cuts could be made. After considerable
deliberation the Committee recommended and the Boards approved a 1992-93 budget
that is $54.2 million less than the 1991-92 budget, summarized as follows:
Comparative Budget Summary
Millions of Dollars
Increase
1991-92 1992-93 <Decrease>
Operations & Maintenance $ 61.4 $ 59.9 $< 1.5>
Sewerage Facilities
Construction 144.2 110.0 <34.2>
Debt Service 35.5 39.0 3.5
Reserves 351.3 329.3 <22.0>
$592.4 $538.2 $<54.2>
W"
(2 of 6)
Staff Report re
State's Proposed Shift of
Districts' Property Taxes/Options
August 18, 1992
All property taxes are allocated to the Operating Funds of the individual
Districts, primarily to pay for debt service. Other operating maintenance and
repair costs are essentially paid by user fees. The budgeted Operating Fund tax
revenue and user fees of the respective Districts for 1992-93 are as follows:
1992-93 Budgeted Property Tax/User Fees
Current
Current
Current
User Fee
District
Tax Revenue
User Fees
Rate
1
$ 2,060,000
$ 5,941,000
$ 75.00
2
9,105,000
18,077,000
60.00
3
11,665,000
18,748,000
60.00
5
2,816,000
2,040,000
75.00
6
1,467,000
2,959,000
65.00
7
4,430,000
4,809,000
40.00
11
2,652,000
3,335,000
60.00
13*
-0-
674,000
100.00
14*
-0-
-0-
-0-
Total/Avg.
$34,195,000
$56,583,000
$ 60.01
*District 13 receives no property taxes. District 14 is financed by the Irvine
Ranch Water District. Therefore, because they are not affected by the property
tax shift they will not be discussed in this report.
Most other costs of operations continue to rise for several reasons beyond our
control. First are the added costs of complying with regulatory requirements -
both air quality and water quality. Second are the costs associated with
increasing sewerage flows resulting from ongoing development and population
increases. Part of the costs associated with these two are, of course, the
expenses necessary for operating and maintaining the approximately $100 million
in new facilities that are placed into service each year. Finally, the impacts
of inflation affect our costs.
(3 of 6)
Staff Report re
State's Proposed Shift of
Districts' Property Taxes/Options
August 18, 1992
Notwithstanding these increasing costs, $1.5 million in operating budget cuts
were made in 1992-93 and, as a result the operating budgets are very tight. In
fact, due to the probable delay in starting up central generation we anticipate
running over the budget because we will not realize the full electrical cost
savings anticipated with an earlier start-up. There are few discretionary
expenditures in operating wastewater treatment facilities. Although some
further operating budget cuts might be made, any significant reductions would
impair our operating and maintenance capabilities and jeopardize our ability to
keep the collection, treatment and disposal facilities in a state of repair that
enables us to continuously comply with regulatory requirements and protect
public health, the marine environment and the beaches. The experience of our
sister agencies (for example, the City of Los Angeles and the City of San Diego)
has shown that when operating and maintenance budgets are inadequately financed
it causes facilities breakdowns, which in the case of these two cities have
resulted in repeated beach closures and attendant fines by regulatory
authorities, as well as enforcement actions.
With regard to the capital budgets, $34.2 million has already been cut from the
1992-93 budget. Additional cuts could be made in the capital budgets, however,
the Directors discussed this at considerable length and concluded that it would
be counterproductive in that it would further exacerbate the Orange County
economic situation and, further, that it is advantageous to continue with the
construction program because of the excellent bids that we are receiving.
Moreover, most of the capital expenditures this year are for projects already
underway. There is very little new work.
Further, property taxes are not used to finance capital projects, except to the
extent that they retire the securities issued by the Districts to finance the
work. The Districts current capital program is being funded by issuance of debt
in accordance with the Districts' long range financial plan. These funds are
committed and must be spent within the specified time frame to avoid illegal
arbitrage. Thus, there would be little advantage to further cutting the capital
budget.
2. Use of Reserves
Another option is to use existing reserves to offset the loss of property taxes.
Enclosed is a separate staff report (gray) on user fees. Attached to the report
are revised cash flow estimates for 1992-93 (tan and green) that reflect the
impact on reserves for both the 100% tax loss scenario and the 25% tax loss
scenario. The cash flows assume that the 1992-93 tax loss would not be
recovered but that user fees would be raised in subsequent years to make up for
the loss of property tax in each of those years. As a result, the reserves at
the end of the five year period, which are shown on Line 17, are reduced by an
amount greater than the first year's loss in property taxes because of loss of
interest earnings on those monies in 1992-93 and subsequent years. If it were
the Boards' desire to recoup those taxes lost the first year then the user fees
would have to be increased accordingly in subsequent years over what is shown on
Line 22. Following is a summary of the impact on each District for the two
scenarios:
(4 of 6)
M
Staff Report re
State's Proposed Shift of
Districts' Property Taxes/Options
August 18, 1992
Impact of 1992-93 Tax Loss if Made up by Reserves
$8.5
Million (25%) Tax
Loss
$34.2
Million (100%) Tax
Loss
Reduction in Reserves
Reduction in
Reserves
1992-93
1992-93
District
Tax Loss
1992-93
By 1996-97
Tax Loss
1992-93
By 199
1
$ 515,000
$ 534,000
$ 739,000
$2,060,000
$2,136,000 $
2,836,00
2
2,277,000
2,361,000
3,131,000
9,105,000
9,440,000
12,539
3
2,916,000
3,028,000
4,073,000
11,665,000
12,114,000
16,299
5
704,000
730,000
970,000
2,816,000
2,920,000
3,87E
6
367,000
381,000
511,000
1,467,000
1,523,000
2,04E
7
1,107,000
1,147,000
1,522,000
4,430,000
4,593,000
6,09E
11
663,000
687,000
913,000
2,652,000
2,749,000
3,651
Total
$8,549,000
$8,868,000
$11,859,000
$34,195,000
$35,475,000 $47,349,000
3. Increase User Fees
The third option is to offset the loss of property tax revenues by increasing
user fees in an amount equivalent to recover a portion or the full amount of the
loss. Unfortunately, there is a practical problem as well that may dictate what
alternatives the Boards have for 1992-93. As the Directors are aware, we
collect our annual sewer user fees on the property tax bill because it is the
most cost-effective way to do it. In order to do this the County Auditor
requires that we have our user fee rates to them on computer tapes by August
24th, which requires that they be processed several days in advance of that.
Since the Governor and State Legislators have failed to come to terms on the
state budget as of this writing, we have effectively missed this cut-off date.
However, it may be that a supplemental tax bill could be issued and staff and
counsel are looking into this possibility. There are certain obvious downsides
to issuing a supplemental tax bill reflecting a fee increase.
(5 of 6)
r
Staff Report re
State's Proposed Shift of
Districts' Property Taxes/Options
August 18, 1992
The enclosed updated cash flows (blue and gold) reflect the impact on the
Districts' financial position of increasing the user fee to make up for the
property tax shortfall in 1992-93 and subsequent years. Basically, this
alternative keeps the Districts in the exact same fiscal position as if there
were no property tax shift; ie., as already budgeted for 1992-93 (see white cash
flows), except that user fees would be increased to replace property taxes lost,
as summarized below:
Fee Increase to Raise $8.5 Million Fee Increase to Raise $34.2 Million
Adopted
1992-93 25% Tax Loss 1992-93 100% Tax Loss 1992-
District SFR Fee Fee Increase SFR Fee Fee Increase SFR F
1
$ 75.00
$ 6.97
(+ 9%)
$ 81.97
$ 27.88
(+ 37%)
2
60.00
8.63
(+14%)
68.63
34.52
(+ 58%)
3
60.00
10.38
(+17%)
70.38
41.54
(+ 69%)
5
75.00
26.53
(+35%)
101.53
106.13
(+142%)
6
65.00
8.57
(+13%)
73.57
34.25
(+ 53%)
7
40.00
11.15
(+28%)
51.15
44.64
(+112%)
11
60.00
13.03
(+22%)
73.03
57.09
(+ 95%)
13
100.00
.00
100.00
.00
Avg 60.01 JILL2 +17% 70.13
JWS:sc
Enclosures
(6 of 6)
$102.
94
101
181
99
o,
40.80 +68% 100.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
M
'`111�
1% r
August 13, 1992
STAFF REPORT
1992-93 SEWER USE FEES
BACKGROUND
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
(714) S62-2411
During the 1980's and early 1990's, each of the Districts considered and adopted a
sewer use fee for ongoing operations, maintenance and rehabilitation costs.
Although property taxes, connection fees and federal and state construction grants
have historically been the major sources of financing of Districts' activities, they
became inadequate during this period. Since the passage of Proposition 13, all ad
valorem property tax revenue has been used in the Operating Funds for maintenance,
operations, rehabilitation and retirement of certificates of participation and none has
been available for capital improvements.
To keep pace with the stringent requirements of the federal, state and regional
regulatory agencies for advanced wastewater treatment and air emissions control, all
Districts except No. 14 review their user fee annually. No adjustment was made to
the fees for 1992-93. The average annual fee for a single family residence is $60.
District No. 14 is fully funded by the IRWD.
In addition to new regulatory requirements, cost increases are also generally
attributable to inflation, to additional flows generated by the natural population
increases from the excess of births over deaths and in -migration. Federal and state
assistance from the clean water grant program has been eliminated by Congress
because of federal funding problems.
As a part of the State of California budget deliberations for 1992-93, the Legislature
and the Governor have currently proposed diverting all or a portion of the historical
share of the property tax which has heretofore been allocated to special enterprise
districts. For the Sanitation Districts this amounts to a reduction in budgeted revenue
for 1992-93 of between $8.9 million (25%) and $34.2 million (100%), based on the
two alternative proposals under consideration.
The purpose of this report is to examine the impact of this significant loss of revenue
upon the previously adopted user fees of each District.
FUTURE FINANCING PROJECTIONS
The attached Statement of Projected Cash Flows for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11 and 13 (white) have been prepared in accordance with the adopted 1992-93
budgets and the "2020 VISION" Financial Plan recommendations that each District's
share of the treatment plant construction, and its respective trunk sewer construction
1992-93 Sewer Use Fees r
Page 2
August 13, 1992 •
projects, be financed by a combination of increased connection fees to pay for new
capacity and borrowing to pay for rehabilitation and improved treatment. Debt
retirement and escalating operating and maintenance costs would now be paid by
increasing the annual sewer use fees, or dipping into reserves since reduced or no
property taxes will be available under the following assumptions:
1. Renewal of NPDES Permit and Continuation of Current
Treatment Levels (301 fhl Waiver)
This scenario continues to represents the minimum probable level of
construction, rehabilitation and operations and maintenance costs. For the first
five years of the planning period, the differences between renewal of our
existing permit and full secondary treatment are not significant. Additional
sewage flow and sewer connection assumptions are also consistent with the
Master Plan.
2. Connection Fees
The capital facilities connection fee includes the cost of future and existing
facilities on a per unit basis. The reason to include future costs is that we any
new flow will require new additional capacity.
The connection fee policy provides for an annual adjustment of fees to reflect
changes in the Engineering News Record -LA Construction Cost Index. A fee
increase of 5% per year is projected in the cash flows for the years 1993-94
through 2001-02. The 1992-93 fee has been left at the 1991-92 level in
accordance with a prior Board action.
3. Debt
Over the next 10 years, all of the Districts except Nos. 13 and 14 are projected
to issue COP -type debt to meet a portion of Joint Works treatment facilities
improvements. Borrowing has been a part of the long-range financial plan for
capital improvements since the policy of using all property tax revenues for
operations, maintenance and rehabilitation was implemented. Extensive use of
the now discontinued Federal and State Clean Water Grant Program enabled the
Districts to stretch out their reserves and other income and to avoid borrowing
until now. Three primary reasons to issue debt are: to protect and to preserve
capital reserves; to avoid major increases and fluctuations in user fees from
year-to-year; and to spread the cost of facilities over their useful lives.
1992-93 Sewer Use Fees
Page 3
August 13, 1992
1`.011 The cash flow projections include regularly scheduled COP issues through 1995-
96 to meet capital project award and cash flow requirements, and to avoid
federal interest earnings restrictions on unspent proceeds. The "2020 VISION"
Financial Plan projected borrowing approximately $750 million and the Directors
may want to extend this plan through 1996-97 in order to reach that target.
4. Reserves
As a part of the financial plan developed by the financial team of the Fiscal
Policy Committee, staff and consultants, the Boards have implemented a plan to
build reserves for certain future events. The approved reserve policy calls for
Dry -Period Reserves, Operating Contingency Reserves, Capital Project Reserves,
Environmental Requirement Reserves, and Insurance Reserves. When an
adequate funding level for these reserves has been reached, a Fee Stabilization
Fund will be created.
Increasingly stringent environmental standards at the federal, state, regional and local
levels, as well as inflationary trends, have made it clear that user fee rates will have
to increase - and at an accelerated pace - to maintain each District's financial
integrity. However, there are several unknowns that could have a major impact on
the projected cash flow requirements, including completion schedules for major
facilities and the renewal of the Districts' 301(h) permit. The attached schedules
assume all projects are completed as planned and may be considered worst case, or
most costly, scenarios with the exception of the 301(h) issue.
ANNUAL USER FEE HISTORY
The sewer use fee program methodology is identical in each of the Districts; the only
difference is the schedule of rates charged to the various categories of users, since
each District's financial situation varies. The adopted programs are in accordance
with the Districts' adopted Revenue Program required by the Federal Clean Water
Act, and have been approved as "fair and equitable" by the State Water Resources
Control Board. The user fees are collected as a separate line item on the annual
County of Orange property tax bills.
District No. 1
In late 1984, District No. 1 modified its long-range financial plan to include a
supplemental sewer use fee. The initial fee was set at $60 per year for a single-
family residence. Before the 1985-86 fees could actually be assessed, the 301(h)
waiver was granted and the fees were reduced to $26.40 per year based upon water
meter size.
1992-93 Sewer Use Fees
Page 4
August 13, 1992
In August 1986, the State Water Resources Control Board revised their ruling that
water meters provided a "fair and equitable" distribution of costs and required the
District to change the user fee to a flat rate charge of $26.40 per year for 1987-88.
Because of significant financial shortfalls in 1988, District No. 1 declared their intent
to increase their use fee 30% annually in order to maintain their financial integrity.
For the 1988-89 year, the Board again reviewed the Districts' long-range financial
plan and subsequently increased the use fee to $34.32 per year. The single-family
residential rate was $45.00 for 1989-90, $55.00 for 1990-91 AND $75.00 FOR
1991-92 AND 1992-93.
The Master plan adopted in 1989 projected a fee of $100 by 1992-93.
District No. 2
The District No. 2 Board approved the initial user fee for the District for 1990-91, and
set the single-family residential rate at $55.00 per year. During the user fee adoption
process, the Directors and the public were informed that the annual fee was projected
to increase and could be as high as $75.00 for 1991-92. The rate adopted for 1991-
92 and 1992-93 was $60.00 for a single-family residence, consistent with the 1989
Master Plan.
District No. 3
After several years of discussion, the District No. 3 Board adopted the sewer use fee
program in March 1989 for the 1989-90 fiscal year in the amount of $30.36 per
year. Future fees were expected to increase, but were not projected pending
completion of the 30-year Master Plan. Major rehabilitation/repair of manholes
damaged by corrosion, increasing costs described above, and the need to repay
existing and future COP -type debt, required a rate increase for 1990-91 to $50.00
The single-family residential rate of $60.00 for 1991-92 and 1992-93 is below the
Master Plan projection of $100 for 1992-93.
District No. 5
The first District to implement a user fee was District No. 5 in 1981. The initial fee
for a single-family residence was $26.40 per year, based on water meter size. When
the program was originally presented to the public and adopted by the Board, it was
anticipated that it might be necessary to increase the fee by approximately 77%,
beginning in the second year, to finance the rehabilitation work on the trunk sewer
system. With the exception of the state mandated change from a water meter basis
to a flat -rate basis, the rates were unchanged until 1989-90 because of the decline in
1992-93 Sewer Use Fees
Page 5
August 13, 1992
inflation, favorable bids on rehabilitation projects, delays in major plant projects and
unexpected incases in assessed valuations. In accordance with the Master plan and
to smooth the transition to the rates needed to retire future debt, the Board adopted
the first increase in user fees effective 1989-90, with a single-family residential rate
of $45.00 per year and increased it to $55.00 in 1990-91.
The rate for 1991-92, $75.00 per year, continued the process recommended in the
Master Plan and was consistent with the rate projected in the Master Plan.
Maintaining that fee for 1992-93 brought the District below the Master Plan
projection of $100.
District No. 6
In 1983, District No. 6 became the second Sanitation District to implement a sewer
use fee. During the public workshops and hearing, the public was advised that the
fee was expected to increase substantially from the $26.40 per year for a single-
family residence in the first year, to $46.80 per year in the second year, to cover
rising costs and then remain at the increased level.
However, the District was able to delay any fee increase until 1986-87, due to a
decline in inflation rates, receipt of favorable bids on construction and rehabilitation
projects, delays in project schedules, a significant increase in assessed valuation of
`...� certain parcels in 1984-85, and the positive impact of the formation of District No.
14. The assessed valuation increase was reversed by the County Assessor in 1986-
87, however, and the use fee was increased by 10% to $29.04 for 1986-87, 10%
to $31.68 for 1987-88, 10% to $38.02 for 1988-89, and 14% to $49.00 for 1989-
90 (the 1989-90 fee was slightly above the fee originally predicted for 1984-85), and
12% to $55.00 for 1990-91.
The fee for 1991-92 and 1992-93, $65.00 for a single-family residence, reflected a
necessary continuation of the fee increase to cover rising costs described above and
to provide for debt service. The fee is below the $75.00 fee in the Master Plan
projections.
District No. 7
District No. 7 was the last of the Districts to adopt a user fee to supplement the
property tax revenues. The 1991-92 year was the initial year of user fees and the
rate was set at $40.00 for a single family residence; below the $50.00 fee projected
in the Master Plan. The same fee and projection applies to 1992-93.
M5
1992-93 Sewer Use Fees
Page 6
August 13, 1992
District No. 11
District No. 11 modified its long-range financial plan in 1987 to include a sewer use
fee to address a shortfall in ad valorem property tax revenues and to provide
additional financing necessary for operations and maintenance and major facilities
rehabilitation/repair. The use fee for a single-family residence was set at $26.40 per
year for 1988-89, and was projected to be $45.00 per year by 1990-91.
The Board adopted a fee of $40.00 per year for 1989-90. The increased costs
described earlier and the need to repay debt issued in 1990-91 and 1991-92 required
an increase in the single-family residential use fee to $60.00 for 1991-92. This fee
was again adopted for 1992-93 and is lower than the $150 projected in the 1989
Master Plan.
District No. 13
District No. 13 has never received ad valorem property tax revenues as a result of
protracted tax exchange negotiations and settlement with the County, which
ultimately led to the formation of the District.
When District No. 13 was formed in 1985, the Directors set the annual use fee at
$70.00 per household, higher than the fees in other Districts, as no property tax
revenue is received by the District. A connection fee schedule was also implemented
at that time to pay for additional facilities to serve new development.
Despite increased costs of operating and maintaining the joint treatment facilities for
the reasons described above, the sewer use fee in District No. 13 has increased only
twice because proportionately higher development has spread fixed costs over more
properties. In 1988-89, the fee was increased 12% to $78.40 per year, and for
1990-91 the annual fee was increased to $95.00 for a single-family residence.
The fee adopted for 1991-92 and 1992-93, $100.00 for a single-family residence is
lower than the $135 projected in the Master Plan for the slow growth assumption.
CURRENT USER FEE ALTERNATIVES
With the diversion by the State of between $8.9 million and $34.2 million from
current operating fund revenues, the Directors may wish to reconsider the previously
adopted user fees for 1992-93. In order to change the user fees on the 1992-93
property tax bills, any changed rates must be given to the County Auditor -Controller
by August 24, 1992. Any actions now will not allow sufficient time for the County
Data Center to prepare a tape for the Auditor -Controller, and will not be reflected on
the regular tax bills until 1993-94 when the annual fees will again be considered.
1992-93 Sewer Use Fees
Page 7
August 13, 1992
In the hope of an additional extension or a revised tax bill, the Directors may decide
to increase the user fees to make up for the property taxes taken by the Governor
and the Legislature. These fee adjustments are categorically exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements.
Fee Increase to Raise $8.9
Million
Fee Increase to Raise $34.2 Million
Adopted
1992-93
25% Tax Loss
1992-93
100% Tax Loss
1992-93
District
SFR Fee
Fee Increase
SFR Fee
Fee Increase
SFR Fee
1
$75.00
$6.97
$ 81.97
$27.88
$102.88
2
60.00
8.63
68.63
34.52
94.52
3
60.00
10.38
70.38
41.54
101.54
5
75.00
26.53
101.53
106.13
181.13
6
65.00
8.57
73.57
34.25
99.25
7
40.00
11.15
51.15
44.64
84.64
11
60.00
13.03
73.03
57.09
112.09
13
100.00
.00
100.00
.00
100.00
14
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
Average
$ 60.01
$10.12
$ 70.13
$ 40.80
$100.81
The attached Statements of Cash Flow (blue and gold) have been prepared to show
`..►� the effect of raising the user fee to compensate for the entire amount of property
taxes to be lost. The effects of missing the deadline or electing not to increase the
1992-93 fees foregoing the lost taxes and increasing fees for 1993-94 and
subsequent years are shown on the attached green and tan schedules.
No action is required by Districts 13 or 14 as District 13 has never received any
property tax revenue and District 14 is fully funded by the IRWD.
REF: WPD OMSEWER. FEE\MMUSEFEE.1
6/17/92 CF 938.XLS 10:43 PM
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Last Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 $hare of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Unapprop or Portion of Insurance Reserve
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 THRU 14
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
1992-93 Budget
Fees Same As 1991-92
5-Veer Tetel 5-Veer Total
6/17/92 ,
Page 1
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1996-97
1992.1997
1997-2002
10-Year Total
113, 590.000
122,748,000
130,470.250
134,994.760
139,883, 500
113, 590,000
143,787, 500
113, 590,000
34,195,000
35,963.000
36,985,000
39,465,000
40.004,000
185,212,000
225,335.000
410,547,000
5.895.000
6.780.000
7,797,000
8,987,000
10,313.000
39,752,000
79,980.000
119,732,000
52,288,000
58,722,000
88,401,000
78.418,000
88,625.000
346,454,000
534,334,000
880,788,000
8,449,000
9,060.000
9.476,000
9,800,000
10.102.000
46,876,000
58,997,000
105,873,000
1,868,000
2.011,000
2,380,000
2.679,000
2,797,000
11,735,000
13,885,000
25,620,000
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
O
102,694.000
112,120,000
125.039,000
138.329,000
151,841,000
630.029,000
912,531,000
1.542,560,000
216.284,000
234.874.000
255.509.250
273,323.750
291,724,500
743,819.000
1,056,318,500
1.656,150,000
48,648,000
51,011.000
56,112,000
61.724,000
67,898.000
285,393,000
455,976.000
741,369,000
11.316.000
10,121.000
10,622,000
11,150,000
11,703,000
54.912.000
67,822,000
122,734.000
33,572,000
43,271,760
53,780,500
60.666.250
69,338,000
259,528,500
341.112,070
600,638.570
93.536.000
104.403,760
120,514.500
133.440,250
147,937,000
599,831.500
864.910.070
1,464,741,570
122.748,000
130,470, 250
134,994.750
139,883,500
143,787, 500
143.787.500
191.408,430
191.408,430
45,903,000
51.299,000
59.288.000
65,878.000
72,842,000
72,842,000
94,600,000
94,580,000
18,708.000
20,880,000
24.103,800
28,689,200
29.587,800
29,587,800
38,497,400
38.497,400
58,137.000
58,291,250
51.604,950
47,518.300
41,357,700
1 41,357,700
58,331,030
58,331,030
LINE
1
2
3
4
6
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 User Fee Information 21
22 Single Family Residence User Fee $60 $67 $78 $89 $101 $129 22
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 844,704 846,374 849,594 854.124 859,609 889,584 23
24 Estimated User Fees, Excludes IRWD 50,688,000 58,922.000 66,401,000 76,319,000 86,425,000 114,565,430 24
CF1 93AXLa 611710E ed7 PM P p 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper,
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19. 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserves
21
1992-93 Budget
Fees Same As 1991-92
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 8117/92
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002
1A97.1907 1997.9nn7
1992-93
1993.94
1994-95
1995.96
199G-97
5-Year Total
5-Year Total
10-Year Total
9,135,000
8,375,000
8,039,750
8,268,250
9,161,000
9,135,000
10,978,000
9 135 000'
2,060,000
2,142,000
2.229,000
2,317.000
2,410,000
11,157,000
13,571.000
24.728,000
400,000
460.000
529,000
608.000
699,000
2,696,000
5,425,000
8,121.000
6,541.000
7.025,000
8,891.000
10.774.000
12.680,000
44,911,000
66,457,000
111,368.000
611,000
572,000
567,000
606,000
701,000
3,057,000
5.096,000
8,153,000
281,000
274,000
308,000
338,000
350,000
1,551,000
1.760,000
3,301.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,893,000
10,473,000
12,623,000
14,643,000
16 840 000
63,372,000
92,299,000
155 671 000
18,029,000
18,849,000
20,562,750
22,911,250
26,001,000
72,507,000
103,277,000
164,806,000
4,875,000
4.902,000
5.392,000
5,931,000
6,524,000
27,424.000
43,810.000
71.234,000
650,000
693.000
717.000
753.000
791,000
3,694,000
4.595.000
8,189,000
4,328,000
5,223,250
6,189,500
7,060,250
7,708,000
30,511,000
38 540 000
69,051,000
9,653,000
10,808,250
12,294,500
13,750,250
15,023,000
61,529,000
88,945,000
148,474,000
8.375,000
9,039,750
8.268.250
9.161,000
10,978,000
16,978,000
16,332.000
16,332,000
4,827,000
5,404,000
6,147.000
6,975,000
7,512.000
7,512,000
9.613,000
9,613,000
1,931,000
2,162,000
2,459,000
2,750,000
3,005,000
3 005 000
3 845 GOO
3,845,000
1 617 000
473,750
1337 760)
(464,000)
461 000
461,000
2,974, 000
2,874,000
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10'
11
12
13
14
15
18
17
18
19
20
21
22 Single Family Residence User Fee $75 $95 $120 0145 $170 $175 22
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 73,880 73,960 74,090 74,300 74,590 77,090 23
24 Estimated User Fees $5,641,000 $7,025.000 $8,891,000 $10,774,000 $12.680.000 $13,490.750 24
CF2 9LA.XLa a/17/Q Afi PM P c. 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry-over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of I % Tax Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 Ueer Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP•Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19. 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 User Fee Data
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite
24 Estimated User Fees
1992-93 Budget
Fees Same As 1991-92
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 6117/92
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
R. V.., Tnt.1 8- Vwwr Tntwl
1992.93
1993-94
1994-96
1995-98
1996-97
1992.1997
1997-2002
10-Year Total
28,843,000
27,480,000
28,060,000
28,918,000
31,608,000
26,843,000
35,487,000
28,843,000
9.105,000
9.469,000
9,848,000
10,242,000
10.852,000
49,316,000
60,001,000
109,317,000
2,250.000
2,588,000
2,978,000
3.422,000
3,935,000
15.171.000
30.512,000
45,683,000
15,827.000
19.505.000
22,568,000
26.723,000
30,996.000
114,619.000
165,860,000
280,479,000
1,907,000
1,947.000
1.994,000
2.117,000
2,349.000
10,314.000
15.379,000
26,693.000
522,000
613,000
712.000
801,000
837.000
3,485,000
4.175,000
7,860,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29,611,000
33,122,000
38,098,000
43,305,000
48,789,000
192,905,000
275,927,000
468,832,000
56,454,000
60,802,000
86,158,000
72,223,000
80,377,000
219,748,000
311,414,000
495,675,000
15.789.000
16,558,000
18,214.000
20,035.000
22,039,000
92.635,000
148,005,000
240,640.000 '
2.099.000
2.204.000
2.314.000
2,430,000
2.552,000
11,599,000
14.810.000
26.409,000
11,080,000
13,780,000
16,712,000
18,150,000
20,299.000
80,027,000
101,222,000
181.249.000
28,974,000
32,542,000
37,240,000
40,615,000
44,890,000
184,281,000
204,637,000
448,298,000
27.480,000
28.060.000
28,918,000
31,608,000
35,487.000
35.487.000
47.377.000
47,377,000
14,487,000
16,271.000
18,620,000
20.300,000
22,445.000
22,445,000
29,499,000
29,499,000
5,795,000
6,508,000
7,448,000
8,123,000
8,978,000
8,978,000
11,800,000
11,800,000
7,198,000
5.281 000
2,850,000
3 177 000
41004,000
4,064 000
8 078 000
6 078 000
$60
$70
$85
$100
$115
$120
263,783
264.358
265,608
267,233
289,533
281.033
$15,827,000
$1a.505,000
$22,588,000
$26,723,000
$30,998.000
$33,723,960
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
CF3 03A.XL9_0/17A2_0:24 PM P8Q* 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Last Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
B Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
is Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19. 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 User Fee Data
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units
24 Estimated User Fees
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002
1992-93 Budget
Fees Same As 1991-92
C.V.., T..1.1 r..V.., T.f.l
8117192
Page 1
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-98
1998-97
1992-1997
1997-2002
10-Year Total
34,537,000
36,628,000
38,720,000
39,247,000
39,851,000
34,537,000
38,383,000
34,537,000
11,885,000
12,132,000
12.617.000
13,122,000
13,647.000
03,183.000
76,874.000
140.057,000
1.900,000
2,185,000
2,513,000
2,890,000
3,324,000
12,812,000
25,772,000
38,584,000
16,848.000
18,278.000
21,142,000
24,054,000
26,988,000
107.308,000
179,716,000
287,024.000
2,819.000
2.768.000
2,861,000
2,898,000
2,864,000
14.010,000
15,864,000
29,674,000
506,000
687,000
800,000
915.000
978.000
3,886,000
4,890,000
8,776.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33 538 000
36,048,000
39,933,000
43,979,000
47,801,000
201,199,000
302,916,000
504,115,000
69,075,000
72,674,000
78,653,000
83,126,000
87,652,000
235 738 000
341,299,000
538,652,000
16,668,000
17,477,000
19,225,000
21,148,000
23.263,000
97.781,000
158,224.000
254,OOS,000
4,435,000
2,900,000
3.046,000
3,197,000
3.367,000
16,934,000
19.476.000
38,410,000
10,346,000
13,577,000
17,136,000
18,930,000
22.649.000
82,638,000
112 SSO 070
195.588.070
31,449,000
33,954,000
39,408,000
43,275,000
49,269,000
197,353,000
288 650,070
486,003,070
36,826,000
38,720.000
39.247,000
39,851,000
38,383,000
39,383,000
52,648,930
52,648,930
15,725,000
16,977,000
19,703,000
21,638,000
24,635.000
24,035,000
32,170.000
32.170.000
6,290,000
8,791,000
7,881,000
8,655,000
9,854,000
9,854,000
12,888,000
12,888,000
14,611,000
14,9S2,000
11,603,000
8 5S8 000
3,994,000
3,894,000
7,610,930
7,610,930
$60
$65
$75
$85
$95
280,900
281,165
281.895
282,990
294,085
$16.848,000
$18,278,000
121,142,000
$24,054,000
$26.988,000
$145
289,560
$41,988, 200
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
CFa e3A.xLB e/171Y2 s:44 PM Pp. 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19, 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Raserve
21 USER FEE DATA
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
1992-93 Budget
Fees Same As 1991-92
r—v..• T.t.1 r:.V..• T-1
6117/92
Page 1
1992-93
1993-94
1994.95
1995.96
1996.97
1992.1997
1997-2002
10-Year Toted
8,784,000
10,090,000
11,117,000
11,690,000
11 888 SOO
01784,000
11 938 S00
8,784,000
2.816,000
2,929,000
3,040.000
3.108,000
3,295,000
15,254,000
18,582.000
33.816,000
50,000
58,000
67,000
77,000
89,000
341,000
887.000
1,028,000
1,990.000
2,131,000
2.277.000
2,424,000
2,673.000
11,395,000
15,151.000
26,546,000
668,000
747,000
803,000
831,000
840,000
3,879,000
4,218,000
8,097.000
314,000
124.000
154,000
146.000
131,000
869,000
630,000
1.499.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,828,000
5,989,000
6,347,000
8 848 000
8,928,000
31,738,000
39,248,000
70,986,000
14,512.000
16,079,000
17,464,000
18,338,000
18 814 500
40,522,000
511,184,1300
79,770,000
1,785.000
1,872,000
2.059,000
2,265,000
2.492.000
10.473,000
18,736.000
27,209.000
759,000
797,000
837.000
879,000
923,000
4,195,000
5,352,000
9,547,000
1,978,000
2,293,000
2,878,000
3,305,500
3,463.000
13 917 500
17 316 000
31,232,500
4,522,000
4,962,000
S,774,000
6,449,600
6,878,000
28,585,500
39,403,000
87 988 500
10,090.000
11,117,000
11,890,000
11,888,600
11,938,500
11,938,500
11,781,500
11,781,5D0
2,261,000
2.491,000
2.887.000
3,225,000
3.439.000
3,439,000
4,327,000
4,327,000
904,000
992,000
11155,000
1,290,000
1,370000
1,376,000
1 31,000
1 731 000
6,925,000
7,644,000
7,648,000
7,371,W0
7 121 500
7 121 500
5,723,500
5 723 500
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
18
17
18
19
20
22 Single Family Residence User Fee $75 $80 $85 $90 $95 $120 22
23 dumber of Equivalent Dwelling Units 26,533 26,633 20.783 28,933 27.083 27,833 23
24 Estlmsted User Fees $1,990.000 $2.131,000 $2,277,000 $2,424,000 $2,573,000 $3,339,900 24
Al (
CF6_03A.XLS 61171Q2 0:60 PM_P40. 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1%Tax Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
a User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
Is Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 • 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
1992-93 Budget
Fees Same As 1991-92
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 8117192
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
5 V..r Tne.l 5 VA.. Tnr.l
1992-93
1993.94
1994-95
1996-96
1996-97
1992-1997
1997.2002
10-Year Toted
6,741,000
7,620,000
8,065,000
7,891,000
0,978,000
8 741 000
5,562,000
6,741,000
1.467,000
1.526.000
1,587.000
1.650.000
1.718.000
7,946,000
9,665,000
17,611,000
175,000
201,000
231.000
266.000
306,000
1,179,000
2.375.000
3,554,000
2,784.000
3,002,000
3,224,000
3,447,000
3,071,000
16,128,000
30,025,000
46,153,000
531,000
579,000
688,000
547,000
460.000
2,705.000
1,621,000
4.326.000
32,000
63,000
92,000
114,000
121,000
422,000
570,000
992,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,989,000
5,371,000
5 722 000
6,024,000
6,274,000
28,380,000
44,256,000
72,836,000
11,730,000
12,991,000
13,787,000
13,915,000
13,250,000
35,121,000
49 818 000
79,377,000
2,673,000
2,699.000
2,969,000
3.266.000
3,593,000
15,100,000
24.127,000
39.227.000
301.000
316,000
332.000
349.000
366.000
1.804,000
2.120.000
3,784.000
1,236,000
1 911 000
2 595 000
3,324,000
3,729,000
12,795,000
18.645.000
31,440,000
4,110,000
4,926,000
5,898,000
6,939,000
7,688,000
29,559,000
44,892,000
74 451 000
7,620,000
8,085.000
7,891,000
6,976,000
5,582,000
5,582,000
4,926,000
4,926,000
2,055,000
2,463,000
2,948,000
3,470,000
3,844,000
3,844,000
4,991,000
4,991.000
822,000
985,200
1,179,200
1,387,800
1,537,600
1,537,600
1,998,200
1 996,200
4,743,000
4,616,800
3 783 800
2,118,200
180,400
180,400
12,061,200)
(2,061.200)
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
a
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
18
17
18
19
20
21
22 Single Family Residence User Fee $05 $70 $75 $80 $as $170 22
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 42,830 42,890 42,990 43,090 43,190 43,690 23
24 Estimated User Fees $2,784,000 $3,002,000 $3,224,000 $3.447.000 $3,671,000 $7,427,300 24
CF7 93AALS a/17I97 9:58 PM Pme 1
LINE
1
OPERATING FUND
2
Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3
REVENUE
4
Share of 1 % Tax Allocation
5
Fees: Industrial Waste
8
User Fees
7
Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8
Transfer from COP Funds
9
Other Revenue
10
TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & O
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units
24 Eptimated User Fees
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
1992-93 Budget
Fees Same As 1991-92
K-VA— Tntwl 5-V—T .twl
6117/92
Page 1
1992-93
1993.94
1994.95
1995.98
1996-97
1992.1997
1997-2002
10-Year Total
13,799,000
17,783,000
21,228,000
23,856,000
25,841,000
13,799,000
27,628,000
13,799,000
4,430,000
4,607.000
4.791.000
4.983.000
5,182.000
23,993.000
29.189.000
53,182,000
840.000
966.000
1,111,000
1.278.000
1.470.000
5,665,000
11,405,000
17,070.000
3.969,000
3,977,000
3,993.000
4,017,000
4,049.000
20,005,000
22.291.000
42,296,000
1.114.000
1,378,000
1,692.000
1.755,000
1.888,000
7,727,000
11,730.000
19,457,000
147,000
124.000
159,000
191.000
199.000
820,000
970,000
1.790.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,500,000
11,052,000
11,648,000
12,224,000
12,788,000
58,210,000
75,585,000
133,795,000
24,299,000
28,935,000
32,874,000
36,080,000
38,629,000
72,009,000
103,213,000
147,594,000
2,798,000
2.933.000
3,226,000
3.649,000
3.904,000
16.410,000
26.214.000
42.624.000
1.588,000
1,667,000
1.750.000
1,838.000
1,930,000
8,773.000
11.198.000
19,971,000
2,130,000
3,007,000
4,042,000
4,852,000
5,167.000
19,198,000
25.835.000
45,033,000
6,516,000
7,607,000
9,018,000
10,239,000
11,001,000
44,381,000
63,247,000
107,628,000
17,783,000
21,228.000
23,856,000
26.841.000
27,628,000
27,628,000
39,966.000
39.966,000
3,258,000
3,804,000
4,509,000
5.120,000
5,601,000
5,501.000
6,959,000
6,959,000
1,303,000
1,5211000
1804,000
2,048,000
2,200,0W
2,200,000
2,783,000
2,783 000
13,222,000
15,903,000
17 543 000
18,873,000
19,927,000
19,927,000
30,224,000
30,224,000
W
W
W
W
Soo
99,228
99,428
99,828
100,428
101.228
$3,969,000
$3,977,000
$3,993,000
$4,017,000
$4,049,000
$45
105,228
$4,736,260
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
8
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
I . (
011 03AALS e117102_1005 PM Pqe 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation
5 Foes: Industrial Waste
8 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellanecus Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & O
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19. 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
1992-93 Budget
Fees Same As 1991-92
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 6117192
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002
5-Venr Tntal _q-Veer Tntwl
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1998-97
1992-97
1997-2002
10-Year Total
112,240,000
13,245,000
13,580,5W
13,293,500
12 827.000
12,240,000
11,860,000
12 240.000
2,652,0GO
2,758,000
2,868,000
2,983,000
3,102,000
14,363.000
17,473,000
31,836,000
280,000
322.000
370,000
426,000
490,000
1,888,000
3.804,000
5,892,000
3,055,000
3,322,000
3,602.000
4,145.000
4,694.000
18,818,000
35,700,000
54,518,000
901,000
946,000
947,000
913.000
862,000
4,569.000
4,570.000
9,139,000
66.000
126,000
15S,000
174,000
181.000
702.000
900,000
1,602,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6 954 000
7,474,000
7,942,000
8,641,000
9,329,000
40,340,000
62,447,000
102 787 000
19,194,000
20,719,000
21,522,500
21,934,500
21,958,000
52,580,000
74,307,000
115 027 000
2.809,000
2,943.000
3,237,000
3,561,000
3,917.000
16.467,000
28.307.000
42,774,000
885,000
908,000
953,000
1,001,000
1,051,000
4,778,000
6.100,000
10,878,000
2,275,000
3,287,5W
41,039,000
4,745,500
5,128,000
19,475,000
25 840 000
45,115,000
5,949,000
7,138,500
8,229,000
9,307,500
10,096,000
40,720,000
58,047,000
98 767 ODO
13, 245,000
13, 580,500
13, 293.500
12.627.000
11.860.000
11, 860.000
16.260,000
16, 260,000
2,975,000
3,669.000
4,115.000
4,8S4,000
5,049.000
6,048,000
6,390,000
6,390,000
1,190,000
1,428,000
1,646,000
1,862,000
2,019,000
21019.000
2,556,000
2,556,000
9 080 ODO
8,583,500
7,532,500
61111,000
4,793,000
4,793,000
7,314,000
7,314,000
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 Single Family Residence User Fee 160 $05 $70 $80 $90 $160 22
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 50.910 51,110 51,460 51,810 52,160 53,910 23
24 Estimated User Fees 13,055,000 $3.322,000 $3,602,000 $4,145,000 $4,694,000 $8,625,600 24
CF13 a3A.XL9 e/1719k10:1a PM-P.W I
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Last Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 196 Tax Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
8 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
Is. 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
1992-93 Budget
Fees Same As 1991-92
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 0117/92
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pape 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
S-V- Tnlel 5-Veer Tnrwl
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1996-97
1992-1997
1997-2002
10•Year Total
1,016,000
1,136,000
1,245,000
1,327,000
1,385,000
1,016,000
1,423,000
1,016,000.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
674,000
694,000
704.000
734.000
774,000
3,570,000
4,984.000
8,554,000
76,000
84,000
91.000
96,000
100,000
447.000
515.000
962,000
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7150,000
788,000
795,000
030,000
874,000
4,017,000
5,499,000
9,516,000
1,768,000
1,904,000
2,040,000
2,157,000
2 259,000
S.033.000
8,922,000
10,532,000
429.000
449,000
494.000
543,000
697,000
2,512,000
4,013,000
6,525.000
173,000
182,000
191.000
201.000
211.000
958,000
1,227,000
2.185.000
28,000
28,000
28,000
28,000
28,000
140,000
140.000
280,000
630,000
859 000
713,000
772,000
836,000
3,610,000
5,380,000
8,990,000
1,136,000
1.245,000
1,327.000
1,385,000
1,423.000
1,423,000
1,542,000
1,542.000
315,000
330,000
357,000
386,000
418,000
418,000
631,000
631.000
126,000
131,800
142,600
154,400
167,200
167,200
252,200
252,200
695,000
783,200
827,400
844,600
837,800
837,800
858 800
658,800
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
18
17
18
19
20
21
22 Single Family Residence User Fee $100 0100 $100 $100 $100 $110 22
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 6,740 6,840 7,040 7,340 7.740 11,240 23
24 Estimated User Fees $874,000 $684,000 11704,000 $734,000 $774,000 $1,238,400 24
8117192 CF 938.XLS 2:51 PM
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
15
17
18
19
20
OPERATING FUND
Reserver JL Carry -Over From Lest Year
REVENUE
Share of 1% Tax Allocation
Fees: industrial Waste
User Fees
Interest tL Miscellaneous Income
Tranelar from COP Funds
Other Revenue
TOTALREVENUE
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
EXPENDITURES
Shore of Joint Works M R O
Collection System M G 0 and Other Opst,
COP Service
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
20% Contingency Reserve
Unepprop or Portion of Insurance Reserve
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 THRU 14
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001-2002
25% Tax Diversion
Fee Adj. I992-93
5-Veer Total 5-Year Total
Oil 7t92
Pape 1
1992-93
1993.94
1994-95
1995-95
1998-97
1992-1997
1997-2002
10-Yeer Total
113,590.000
12 2.7 48,000
130,407,250
134,993,750
139,8B3,500
113,590,000
143,789,500
113,590,000
25,645,000
26,672,000
27,739,000
28.849,000
30,005,000
138,911.000
159.023,000
307,934,000
5,896,000
6,780.000
7,797,000
8,967,000
10,313,000
39,752,000
79,980.000
119,732,000
90,835,000
67,812,000
77,a48,000
88,035,000
98,626.000
392,758,000
589,075,D00
981.831,000
8,448,000
9,050,000
9,477,000
9,800,000
10.102,000
48.877,000
58,820,000
105.697,000
1,868,000
2,011,000
2,380,000
2,879,000
2,797,000
11,735,000
13,685,000
25,620,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
102,692.000
112.125.000
125,041,000
138,330.000
151,843.000
830,031,000
910,783.000
1,540,814.000
216,282,000
234,871,000
255,508,250
273.323,750
291,728,500
743,821,000
1,054,572,500
1,854.404,000
48,648,000
51,011,000
50,112,000
81.724.000
67,898,000
285,393,000
455,975,000
741,369,000
11,318,000
10,121.000
10,822,000
11,150,000
11,703.000
54,912.000
87.822,000
122,734,DD0
33,572,000
43,271,750
53,780,500
50.556,250
88,336,000
259,526,500
341,112,070
600.638,570
93,536.000
104.403,750
120,514,500
133.440,250
147,937,000
599.831,500
884,910,070
1,464,741,570
122,746,000
130,467, 250
134,993,750
139.883.500
143,789, 500
143,789,500
189, 502,430
189,662,430
45,903,000
51,299,000
59,298,000
85,676,OOO
72,842,000
72,842,000
94,580,000
94,580,000
18,708,000
20,880,000
24,103,800
28,589,2D0
29,587.800
29,587,13D0
38,497,400
38.497,400
58.135,D00
58,288,250
51,803,950
47,518,300
41,359,700
41,359,700
58.585.030
56.505.030
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 USER FEE DATA 21
22 Singte Family Residence User Fee 470.13 $77.78 189.04 $100.01 $112.17 1141.86 22
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 844,704 840,374 849,594 854,124 855.809 889,584 23
24 Estimated User Fees, Excludes iRWD 59,235,000 65.812,000 75,848,000 85,935,000 96,426,000 128.199,415 24
CF1 s]A.1rla e11?192 3:21 pm-P.Q. I
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Cerrv-Over From Last Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation
5 Fees: industrial Waste
6 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTALREVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry-Ovar to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserves
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite
24 Estimated User Fee■
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 1
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2D01-2002
25% Tax Diversion
Fee Adj. 1992-93
1992.1997 1997-2002
Revised 8113192
Pape t
1992-93
1993-94
1994 95
1995-96
1996.97
5-Year Total
5-Year Total
10-Year Total
9,135,000
8.375.000
8,039,750
8,287.250
9.160,000
9,135,000
10,977,000
9,135,000
1,545,000
1.507,000
1.871.000
1,738.000
1.808,000
8.389,000
10,181,000
18,550,000
400,000
480.000
529.000
608,000
699.000
2,699.000
5,425.000
8,121,000
5.056,000
7.580.000
9.447.000
11,353,000
13,282,000
47,698,000
89.845,000
117,543,000
611,000
572,000
567,D00
508,000
701,000
3,057,000
5.096,000
8,153,000
291,D00
274,000
308,000
338,000
350,000
1.551,000
1,750,000
3,301,000
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
0
3,893.000
10,473,000
12,522,D00
14,843,000
16,840,000
83.371.000
92,297,000
155.688,000
18,028,000
18.848,000
20,561,750
22 910,250
28,000,000
72,506,000
103,274,000
164,803,000
4,675.000
4,902,000
5,392,000
5,931,000
6,524,000
27.424,000
43.810,000
71,234,000
650,000
683,000
717,000
753,000
791.000
3,594.OD0
4,595.000
8,199,000
4,328,000
5,223,250
8,185.500
7,086,250
7,708,000
30,511.000
38,540,000
69,051,000
9,653,000
10,808.250
12,294,500
13,750,250
15,023,000
61,529,000
88,945,000
148,474,000
8.375,000
8,039,750
8,267,250
9.160,000
10,977.000
10,977,000
16,329,000
16,329.000
4.827,000
5,404,000
0,147,000
6.875,000
7,512.000
7,512,000
9,813,000
9,613,000
1,931.000
2.162.000
2.459,000
2,750.000
3.005,000
3,005,000
3,845,000
3,845,000
1,617,000
473.750
(338,750)
1485,000)
480,000
460,000
2.871,000
2,871,000
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
e
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
$81.97 4102.23 1127.51 1152.80 $178.07 $184.49 22
73,880 73,950 74.090 74,300 74,590 77,090 23
/6,056,000 $7,560,000 $9,447,000 671,353,000 613,282,D00 014,222.334 24
CF1 a3AAL3-efille2-2:31 PIA„P-" I
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Last Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1%Tax Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
25% Tax Diversion
Fee Adj. 1992-93
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 Revised 8113192
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe f
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2DO2
S- Year Tntet S, Year T.W
1992-93
1993.94
1994-95
1995.96
1998-97
1992-1997
1997.2002
10-Yeei Total
26,843,000
27,479,000
28.060,000
28,920,000
31,811,000
28,843,000
35.491.000
26,843,000
6,828,000
7,101,000
7,305.000
7,080.000
7,987,000
38,901.000
44,988,000
81,969,000
2,250,000
2,598,000
2,978.000
3,422.000
3,935,000
15,171.000
30,512,000
45,683,000
18,103.000
20,874,000
25,032.000
29,288,000
33,662.000
126,957,000
180,878,000
307,835,000
1,907,000
1,947.000
1,995,000
2,117,000
2,349,000
10,315,000
15,383.000
25.698,000
522,000
613,000
712,000
901,000
837,000
3,485.000
4,175,000
7.660,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29,510,000
33,123.000
38,100,000
43,306.000
49,770,000
192.909,000
275,936.000
468,845,000
58,453,000
80,802,000
08,160.000
72,226.000
80,381,D00
219,752.000
311,427,000
495,888,000
15,789,000
16.558,000
18,214.000
20.035.000
22.039,000
92,535.000
140,005.000
240,840,000
2,099.000
2,204,D00
2,314,D00
2,430,000
2,552,000
11,599,000
14.810.000
28,409,000
11,086.000
13.780,000
16.712,000
is. 150,000
20,299,000
80.027,000
101,222.000
181,249.000
28,974,000
32,542,000
37,240,000
40.815,000
44,890,000
184,281,D00
264,037,000
448,298,000
27.479,000
28,060,000
28,920,000
3 1. 61 LOGO
35,491,000
35,491,000
47,390,000
47,390,000
t4,487,000
16,271.000
18,620,000
20,308,000
22,445.000
22,445,000
29,499.000
29,499,000
5.795,000
5,.506,000
7,448,000
8,123,000
8,978,000
8.978.000
11,800,000
11,800,000
7,197,000
5.281.000
21852,000
3,180,000
4.068.000
4,088,000
6,091,000
6,091,000
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
e
7
B
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
18
17
18
19
20
21
12 Single Family Residence User Fee 988.53 $78.96 $94.28 $109.59 S124.89 1131.54 22
23 Numbar of Equivalent Dwelling Units 263.783 264,358 265.508 267,233 269,533 281,033 23
24 Estimated User Fees $18,103,000 020.874,000 $25.032,000 129,205.000 $33,862,000 438,967.091 24
CF3_63AJLLS_ef17/e1-7:3a PM P.O. 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3 -REVENUE
4 Share of I % Tex Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M. & 0
14 Collection System M & O and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units
24 Estimated User Fees
25% Tax Diversion
Fee Adj. 1992-93
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 Revised 8/13/92
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002
5-Year Total 5-Year Total
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-95
1996-97
1992-1997
1997-2002
10-Year Total
34,537,000
36,625.000
38,717,000
39,245.000
39.849,000
34,537.000
38,382,000
34.537,000
8,743,000
9,099,000
9,463.000
9,842.000
10.236,000
47,399.000
57,059.000
105,048,000
1,900,000
2,185,000
2,513,000
2,890.000
3,324,000
12.812,000
25,772.000
38,S84,000
19,763,000
21.307,000
24,297.000
27,334,000
30,400,000
123,101,000
198.930,000
322,031,000
2,619,000
2,768,000
2,881,000
2,898,000
2,864,000
14.010,000
15,664,000
29,674.000
SO5,000
687,000
800,000
915,000
978,000
3,886.000
4,890,000
8,776,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33,537,000
36,048,000
39,934.000
43,879,000
47,802,000
201,198,000
302,915.000
504,113,000
68,074,000
72,871,000
78,651,000
83.124.000
87,651,000
235,735.000
341,297,000
538,860,000
16.669,000
17,477,000
19.225,000
21.148,000
23,263,000
97,781,000
156,224.000
254,005,000
4,435,000
2.900.000
3.045.000
3,197.000
3,357,000
18,934,000
19,476,000
36.410,000
10,346,000
13,577,000
17.136,000
10,930.000
22.649.000
82,838,000
112,950,070
195,588.070
31,449,000
33,954.000
39,406,000
43,275,000
49,269,000
197,353,000
288,650.070
486,003,070
35,625,000
30,717.000
39,245.400
39.849.000
313,382.000
38,382.000
52,648,930
52.648,930
16,725,000
18,977,000
19,703,000
21,538,000
24.635.000
24,635,000
32,170.000
32,170,000
6,290.000
6.791,000
7,881,000
8,655.000
9,854,000
9.854.000
12,869,000
12,868,000
14.610,000
14,949,000
11.661,000
9,558,000
3,893,000
3.893,000
7,608.930
7,608,930
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
$70,38 $75.78 686.19 198.59 1107.01 $159.33 22
290,800 281,185 281,895 282.990 284.085 289,560 23
019,783.000 121,307.000 $24,297.000 127,334,000 $30.400,000 448,135.595 24
Cfe •3A XLe e11?f%2 2:3e PM Pp. 1
LINE
I OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
8 User Feee
7 Interest & Miscelfsneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Coilectinn System M & O and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units
24 Estimated User Fees
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 5
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
25% Tax Diversion
Fee Adj. 1992-93
F-Year TMA 5-Yaar Tnral
Revised 8113192
Page 1
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1996-97
1992.1997
1997-2002
10-Year Total
8,784.000
10 090 000
11,117,000
11,690,000
11,1386,500
9,784,000
11,936,500
8,784,000
2,112,000
2,198,D00
2,284,000
2,375,000
2,470,000
11,437,000
13.916,000
25.353,000
50,000
58,000
67,000
77,000
89,000
341.000
587.000
1,028,000
2,894,000
2,884,000
3.039.000
3,217,000
3,398,000
15,212.000
19,796,000
35,008,000
558,000
747,000
803,000
831,000
840,000
3.879.000
4,218.000
9,097,000
314,000
124,000
154,000
148.000
131,000
889,000
630,000
1,499.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,828,000
5,989,000
6,347 000
6,646,000
8,928,000
31,738 ODO
39,247,000
70 985,000
14.812 000
18,079,000
17,464.000
18,336 000
10,814,50G
40,622,000
51 183 SDO
79,769 000
1385,000
1,972.000
2,059,000
2,285,000
2,492.000
10,473,000
15,736,000
27,209,000
759.000
797.000
837.000
879,000
923,000
4.195.000
5.352.000
9,547,000
1,978 000
2 293,000
2,878 000
3 305 500
3,463,000
13.917,500
17,315,000
31 232,500
4,522 000
4 962,000
5,774 000
6,449,500
6,878,000
28 585 500
39,403,000
67988,500
10,090,000
1 1,1 17,000
11, 690,000
11, 886, 500
11,938,500
1 1.93 8.500
11, 7 80,500
11,780.500
2.261,OD0
2,481,000
2,887.000
3,225,000
3,439,000
3,439,000
4.327,000
4,327,000
904,000
992,000
1,155.000
1,290,000
1,370,000
1,376,000
1,731,000
1,731,000
8,925,000
7.844,000
7,648,000
7,371 500
7,121,500
7,121.500
5,722,500
5,722,500
$101.53
6107.52
1113.45
$1 19.44
$125.46
$155.04
28,533
28,833
28,783
26,933
27,083
27,833
02,694,000
$2,864,000
$3.039,000
$3.217,000
$3,398.000
04.343,081
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
8
7
8
9
10
in
12
13
14
15
18
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
CFe f3A.ML3 en7n2 2:41 PM Pp* 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Ter Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
e Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & O
14 Collection System M & 0 end Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units
24 Estimated User Fees
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002
25% Tax Diversion
Fee Adj. 1992-93
5 Yeer Totet S Year Total
Revised 8114192
Pape 1
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995.96
1996-97
1992-1997
1997-2002
10-Year Total
8,741,000
7,620,000
B4O65,000
7,891,000
6,976,000
8,741,000
5,582,000
8,741,000
1,100,000
1,144,000
1,190,000
1,238,000
1,288,000
5,980,000
7,260,000
13,220,000
175,000
201,000
231,D00
266,000
308.000
1,179,000
2,375,000
3,554,000
3.151,000
3,384,000
3.821,000
3,859,000
4,099,000
18,114.000
32,425.000
50.539.000
531,000
579,000
588,000
547,000
480.000
2,705.000
1,618,000
4,323,000
32,000
63,000
92,000
114,000
121,000
422.000
570,000
992,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,989,000
5.371,000
6,722,000
5,024.000
6.274.000
28,380,000
44,248.000
72,628,000
11,730,000
12,991,D00
13.787,000
13.915,000
13,250,000
35,121,000
49,810,000
79,369,000
2.573,000
2,699,000
2.959,000
3,2156,000
3,593,000
15,100,000
24,127,000
39,227,000
301,000
316,000
332.000
349.000
366,0D0
1,894,000
2,120,ODO
3.794,000
1,23B.000
1.911,000
2,595,000
3,324,000
3,729,000
12,795,000
18,645,000
31,440,000
4,110.000
4,926,000
5,896,000
6,939.000
7,888,000
29,559,000
44,892,000
74,451.000
7,620,000
8,065,0D0
7,1191,000
6,978,000
5,562,000
5,582,000
4,131eAo
4,918.000
2,055,000
2,483,000
2,948,000
3.470,000
3,844,000
3,844,000
4,991,000
4.991,000
822,000
985,200
1,179,200
1,387,800
1,537,800
1,537,600
1,996.200
1.996,200
4,743,000
4,615,800
3,783,800
2.118,200
180,400
180,400
(2,069.2001
12,069.200)
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
e
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
$73.57 $78.91 484.23 489.5e $94.91 M181.88 22
42,830 42,890 42,990 43,090 43,190 43.690 23
$3,151,000 $3,384,000 $3,821,000 $3.859,000 04,099,000 $7,946,337 24
cF7 e3A.xL9 6117192 2:44 PM Pp* 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over Front Last Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Foes
7 Intalast & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Opar.
15 COP Service
15 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Yom
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 7
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
25% Tax Diversion
Fee Adj. 1992-93
5-Year Tate! 5-Yeas Total
Revised 8113/92
Pape 1
1992.93
1993-94
1994-95
1995.98
1998-97
1992-1997
1997-2002
10-Year Total
13,799,000
17.783,000
21,228,000
23,856,000
25,841,000
13,799,000
27,829.000
13,799,000
3.323.000
3,458,000
3,594,000
3,738,000
3,888,000
17.999,000
21,904,000
39,903,000
840.000
966,000
1,111,000
1,278,000
1,470.000
5,865,000
11,405,000
17,070,000
5,076,000
5,128.000
6,190.000
5,262,000
6,343,000
25,999,000
29,010,000
54,009,000
1,1t4,000
1,378,000
1,592,000
1,755,000
1,888,000
7,727,000
11.552,000
19,279,000
147.000
124,000
159,000
191,000
199.000
820,000
970.000
1,790,000
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
10.600,000
11.052,000
11,646,000
12,224,000
12,788.000
58,210,000
73,841.000
132.051,000
24,299,000
28,835,000
32,874,000
38,080,000
38,629,000
72,009,000
101,469,000
1413,850,000
2,798,000
2,933,000
3,228,000
3,549,000
3.904,000
16,410.000
28,214.000
42,824.000
1,688,000
1,687,000
1,750,000
1,838,000
1,930.000
8,773,000
11.198,000
19,971,000
2.130,000
3.007,000
4,042,000
4,852.000
5,167,000
19,198.000
25,935.000
45,033,000
8,518,000
7.607,000
9,018.000
10,239.000
11,001,000
44.381.000
63,247,000
107,628,000
17,703,000
21.228,000
23,855,000
25,841.000
27.528.000
27,628,000
38,222,000
38.222,000
3,258.000
3,804,000
4.509,D00
5,120,000
5,501.000
5,501,000
6,959.000
6,959.000
1,303.000
1,521.000
1,804,000
2,048,000
2,200,D00
2.200.000
2,783,000
2,783,000
13,222,000
15,903,000
17,543,000
18,873,000
19,927,000
19,927.000
28,480.000
28.480,000
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1z
13
14
15
18
17
18
19
20
21
22 Single Family Residence User Fee 451.15 $51.58 $51.99 $52.40 152-78 454.95 22
23 Ml mber of Equivalent Dwelling Units 99,228 99,428 99,828 100.428 101,228 105,228 23
24 Estimated User Fees $5,078,000 4S.I28,000 15,190,000 $5,282.000 $5,343,000 $5.782,279 24
CFI t e3A. xL3 a1171i2 2:27 PM PW 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reeervee & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of I % Tart Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
8 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
9 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTALREVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
25% Tax Diversion
Fee Adj. 1992-93
5-Year Total 5-Year Total
Revised Bf13f92
Pape 1
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1998.97
1992-97
1997-2002
10-Year Total
12,240,000
13,245,000
13.580,500
13,293,500
12,827,000
12,240.000
11,960,000
12,240.000
1,989,000
2,089,000
2,152,000
2,238,000
2,326.000
10,776,000
13,115,000
23,891,000
280,000
322.000
370,000
420,000
490,000
1.8118,000
3,804,000
5,892.000
3,718,000
4,011,000
4,318,000
4,890,000
5,408,000
22,405,000
40,057,000
62,462,000
901,000
948,000
947,000
913,000
852,000
4,569,000
4,570,000
9,139,000
68,000
126,000
155,000
174.000
181,000
702,000
900,000
1,602,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,954,000
7,474.000
7,942,000
8,641.000
9,329.000
40,340,000
82.448.000
t02.788.000
19,194,000
20,719,000
21,522,500
21,934,500
21,958,000
52,580.000
74,306,000
115,028,000
2,809,000
2,943.000
3,237,D00
3,561,000
3,917,000
18.467,000
26.307,000
42,774,000
865.000
908.000
953.000
1,001.000
1,051,000
4,778,000
6,100,000
10,878,000
2,275,000
3,287,500
4,039.000
4,745.500
5,128,000
19,475,000
25,840,000
45,115,000
5,949,000
7,138,500
8,229,000
9,307,500
10,096,000
40,720,000
59.047.000
98,767,000
13,245,000
13,580,500
13,293,500
12.627,000
11.aso, D00
11,860,000
16,259,000
16,259,000
2,975,000
3,569,000
4,115,000
4.854,000
5,048,000
5,048,000
9,390,000
8,390.000
I,190,000
1,428.000
1,646,000
1,862,000
2,019.000
2,019,000
2,556,000
2.569,000
9,080,000
8.583,500
7,532,500
6,111.000
4,793.000
4.793,000
7,313.000
1 7,313.000
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 Single Family Residence User Fee 173-03 $70.48 $83.91 $94.38 $104.84 9177.45 22
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 50,910 51,110 51,460 51,810 52,160 53,910 23
24 Eetimeled User Fees $3,718,000 $4,011,000 $4.318.000 $4,890,000 $5,468,000 49,566,330 24
7114I92Cf 93R.XLS 3:55 PM
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry-Ovet From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Wesle
8 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Furxls
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & O
14 Collection System M & 0 and Oihet Oper,
15 COP Service
18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Unepprop or Portion of Insurance Reserve
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 THRU 14
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001-2002
100% Tax Diversion
Fee Adj. 1992-93
5-Year Total 5-Year Total
711419 2
Pape 1
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-98
1996-97
1992.1997
1997-2002
10-Yam Total
113,590,000
122,748,000
130,470,250
134,996,750
139,884.500
113,590,000
143.784,500
113,590,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,895,000
0,780,000
7,797,000
8.967.000
10.313,000
39,752.000
79,980.000
119,732.000
86,483,000
94,285,000
105.387,000
118,892,000
128,625,000
531,682,000
759,571.000
1,291,333,000
8,449.000
9,050,000
9,477,000
9,800,000
10,102,000
46,877,000
58,997,000
105,874,000
1,86B4O00
2.011,000
2,380.000
2,679,000
2,797,000
11.735,000
13,1385,000
25.620,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
102,694,000
112,726.000
125,041.000
138.328,000
151,837,000
830.0215,000
912,533,000
1,542,559,000
215,284,000
234.874.000
255.511.251)
273.324.760
291,721,600 1
743.818.000
1,056,317,500
1,656,149,000
48,849,000
51,011.000
56,112,000
61.724,000
67,898,000
285,393,000
4515.976.000
741,369,000
11,316.000
10,121,000
10.622,000
11.150,000
11,703,000
54,912,000
67,822,000
122,734,000
33.572,000
43,271,750
53,790,500
60,568,250
08,336,000
259,528.500
341,112,070
600,638,570
93,530.000
104,403,750
120,514,500
133.440,250
747,937,000
599.831,500
864,910,070
1,464,741,570
122,748,000
130.470, 250
134,996.750
139.884,500
143,784,500
143,784,500
191.407,430
191,407.430
45,903,000
51,299.000
59,288,000
65,676,000
72.842,000
72.842,000
94,580,000
94,580,000
10.708.000
20,BB0,000
24.103,800
28,689,200
29,587,800
29.587,900
38,497,400
38,497,400
58,137,000
58,291,250
51.606,950
47,619,300
41,354,700
41,354,700
58,330.030
58,330,030
LINE
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
User Fee Information
21
22
Single Family Residence User Fee 61DO.91 $109.27 1121.69 $134.39 0147.07
4183.49 22
23
Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 844,704 946,374 849,594 854.124 859.609
889,584 23
24
Estimated User Fees, Excludes IRWD 04,083,000 92,485,000 103,387,000 114,792,000 128,425,000
163,232.779 24
CF1 93A.KL9 11Ts»2_11 o13 Ate_rwe l
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves 6 Carry-Ovet From test Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tex Alloceti on
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Feee
7 Interest 6 Miscellaneous Income
8 Traneler From COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M 6 0 and Other Opar.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves d Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserves
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
100% Tax Diversion
Fee Adj. 1992-93
1992-1997 1997-2002
Revised 7114193
PAO" 1
1992-93
1993-94
1994.95
1995-96
1996.97
5-Year Total
5-Year TOW
10-Yner Total
9,135,000
8,375,000
8,039,750
8,268,250
9.161,000
9,135,000
10,978,000
9,135,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
400,000
460.000
529.000
608,000
699,000
2,696,000
5,425,000
8,121,000
7,601.000
9,167.000
11,119,000
13,091.000
15.090,000
56,068,000
80,028,000
136,096,000
611,000
572,000
567,000
608,000
701.000
3.057,000
5,098.000
8.153,000
281.000
274,000
308,000
338,000
350,000
1,551,000
1,750,000
3,301,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,893,000
10,473,000
12,623,000
14.843,000
18,840,000
63.372.000
92.299.000
155,671,000
18.028,000
18,848,000
20,562.750
22,911,250
26,001.000
72,507,000
103,277,000
164.806,000
4,675.000
4,902.000
S.392,000
5,931,000
8,524,000
27,424.000
43,810,000
71,234,000
650,000
683,000
717,000
753,000
791,000
3,594,000
4,595,000
8,189,000
4,328,000
5,223,250
a,185,500
7,066,250
7,708,000
30,511,000
3R,540,000
69,051,000
9,653,000
10,808,250
12,294,500
13.750,250
15,023,000
61,529,000
86,945,000
149,474,000
8,375,000
8,039,750
8,268.250
9,161,000
10.978,000
10,978,000
1B.332,000
16,332,000
4,827,000
5,404.000
6,147,000
6,875,000
7,512,000
7.512,000
9,613,000
9,613,000
1,931.000
21162,000
2,459.000
2,750,000
3,005,000
3.005.000
3.845,000
3,845,000
1,817,000
473,750
1337,750)
1464.0001
461,000
461,000
2,874.000
2.874.000
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
8
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
21
22
Single Family Residence Uear Fee 0102.88 $123.96 6150.07 1176.19 $202.31
5213.02 22
23
Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 73.880 73,950 74.090 74,300 74,590
77,090 23
24
Eelimeted User Fees 17,601,000 19,167.000 111,119,000 $13,091,000 $15.090,000
016.421.712 24
Ci7 e3A. XLS 704rf7 11:34 AM P"e 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry. Over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation
5 Fast: Industrlal Waste
6 User Fee■
7 Interest & Miacelleneous Income
6 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
is TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 User Fee Date
100% Tax Diversion
Fee Adj. 1992-93
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 Revised 7/14/92
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
5- Year Tnrek F. Year Tntal
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-98
1998-97
1992 1997
1997.2002
10-Year Tolal
20,843,000
27.481,000
20,061.000
28,920,000
31,609,000
28,643.000
35,488.000
28,843,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,250.000
2.588,000
2,976,000
3,422,000
3.935,000
15,171,000
30,512,000
45.683,000
24,933,000
27,974,000
32,416,000
36,964.000
41,846,000
1153,933.000
225,862.000
389,795.000
1,907,000
1.947,000
1.995,000
2,117,000
2,349,000
10,315,000
15.379.000
25.894.000
522.000
513,0DO
712,000
801,000
637,000
3.495.000
4,175,000
7,660,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
29,812,000
33,122,000
30,099,000
43,304.000
48,767,000
192.904,000
275,928,000
468,832,000
55.455.000
60,603,000
58,100,000
72,224,000
80,370.000
219,747,000
311,414,000
495,675,000
15,789,000
16.658,000
13,214,000
20,035,000
22.039,000
92.835,000
148,005,000
240,640,000
2,099.000
2,204.000
2.314,000
2,430,000
2,552,000
11.599,000
14,810,000
26,409,000
11,086,000
13.780.000
18,712,000
18,150,000
20.299,000
80,027,000
101,222,000
181,249,000
28,974.000
32,542,000
37,740.000
40,815,000
44,890,000
184,261.000
284.037,000
448,298,000
27,491,000
28.061,000
29,920,000
31,609,000
35.486,000
35.486,000
47,377,000
47,377,000
14.487.000
16,271,000
18.620.000
20,308.000
22,445.000
22,445,000
29,499,000
29.499.000
5,795,000
8,508,000
7.448.000
8,123,000
8,978,000
8,978,000
11,600,000
11,800,000
7,199.000
5.282,000
2,852,000
3,178.000
4.063,000
4,063,000
8,078,000
6.078,000
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
8
7
8
9
i0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 Singte Family Residence User Fee $94.52 1105.82 4122.09 $138.32 1154.51 f 168.11 22
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 263,783 264,358 265,508 267,233 289,533 281.033 23
24 Estimated User Fees $24.933,000 $27,974,000 632,416,400 $36,964,000 141,548,000 446.882.392 24
CFS @3A.xL9 7114rs2 12:13 PM P" 1
LINE
1
OPERATING FUND
2
Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3
REVENUE
4
Share of 1 % Tax Allocation
5
Face: Industrial Waste
6
Veer Fees
7
Interest fl, Miscellaneous Income
8
Transfer from COP Funds
9
Other Revenue
1D
TOTALREVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M 6 O
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper,
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves h Carry Over to Nest Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requiramant@
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 User Fee Data
22 Single Family Reaidence User Fee
23 Number or Equivnienl Owelling Unit@
24 Estimated User Fees
100% Tax Diversion
Fee Adj. 1992-93
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 Revised 7114192
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe I
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002
5-Year Total 5-Year Total
1992-93
1993.94
1994-95
1995-98
1996-97
1992.1997
1997.2002
10 Year Total
34,537.000
36,625,000
38.719,000
39,247,000
39,851,000
34,537.000
38.391,000
34,537,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.900.000
2.185.000
2,513.000
2,890,000
3,324,000
12.812.000
25,772,000
39,584,D00
28,512,000
30,408.000
33,760,000
37,176,000
40,633.000
170.489.000
250.591.000
427.090,000
2.619.000
2,788,000
2,881,000
2,898,000
2.884.000
14,010,000
15,684.000
29,674.000
505,000
697,000
800.000
915,000
978,000
3,886,000
4,890,000
8,776,000
0
o
a
0
0
0
0
a
33,537,000
36,048,000
39.934,000
43,879,000
47,799,000
201,197,000
302,917,000
504.114,000
$8.074,000
72.873.000
79,653,000
83,126,000
87,850,000
235,734,000
341,298,000
538,651,000
16,608,000
17,477,000
19,225,000
21,148.000
23,263,000
97.781,000
158.224,000
254,005,000
4,435,ODO
2,900,000
3,045,000
3,197.000
3.357.000
16,934,000
19,475,000
35,410,000
10.348.000
13,577,DO0
17,136,000
18,930,D00
22,649.000
82.838,000
112.950,070
195,588.070
31.449,000
33,954,DOO
39.406,000
43.275,000
49.269,000
197,353,000
288.650,070
488.003,070
36.825.000
38,719,000
39,247,000
39,851,000
38.391.000
39.381,000
52.647,930
52.847.930
15.725.000
18,977,000
19,703,000
21.638.000
24,635,000
24,835,ODO
32,170,000
32,170,000
6,290,000
6,791,000
7,881,000
8.655.000
9.854.000
9,854,000
12.869.000
12,868,000
14,810,000
14,951,000
11,683,000
9,558,000
3,892.000
3,892,0DO
7,609,930
7.809,930
0101.54
0108.15
41 19.76
$131.37
$143.03
0202.34
280,800
291,165
281.995
282,990
284,085
2139,560
/28,512,D00
$30,408,000
$33.760.000
$37,176,000
540,633,000
159,589.570
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
e
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
to
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
CT6 e3A_XLS 7114re2 ]'06 PM Pp0 t
LINE
1
OPERATING FUND
2
Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Yeer
3
REVENUE
4
Share of 1 % Tex Allocation
5
Fees: Industrial Waste
6
User Fes6
7
Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8
Transfer from COP Funds
9
Other Revenue
10
TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Cnrry-Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units
24 Estimated User Fees
100% Tax Diversion
Fee Adj. 1992-93
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 Revised 7114192
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Papa 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2001-2002
5 Yeer Total 5-Year Tarot
1992.93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1998-97
1992-1997
1997-2002
10-Year Total
8.784,000
10,090,000
11,117.000
11,690,000
11,886,500
8.784,000
11,936,500
8,784,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50,000
58,000
87.000
77.000
89,000
341,000
687,000
1.028,000
4.806,000
5,060,000
5,323.000
5.592.000
5,868.000
28,849.000
33.713.000
60,362,000
658.000
747,000
003.000
831.000
840,000
3,879.000
4.218,000
8,097,000
314,000
124,000
154,000
148.000
131.000
869,000
630,000
1,499,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5.828,000
5,989,000
6,347,000
6,848,000
6,928,000
31.738,000
39,248,000
70,986,000
14,612,000
16,079.000
17,484,000
18.338,000
18,814,500
40,522.000
51,184,500
79.770,000
1,785,000
1.872,000
2,059,000
2.285,000
2,492,000
10,473,000
16,738.000
27.209,000
759,000
797,000
037.000
879,000
923,000
4,195,000
5,352,000
9,547,000
1,970,000
2,293,000
2.878.000
3,305,5DO
3,463,000
13.917,500
17,315,000
31,232,500
4,522,000
4.962.000
5.774,000
6,449,500
8,878,000
28,585,500
39.403,000
67,988,500
10,090,000
1 1.1 17,000
11,890,000
1 1.8 8 8, 500
11,936.500
11,936.500
1 1.781.500
1 1.7 81, 500
2,261,000
2,481,000
2.887.00D
3,225.000
3,439,D00
3,439,000
4,327.000
4,327,000
904,000
992,000
1,155.000
1,29D,000
1.376,000
1,376,000
1.731.000
1.731.000
8,925.000
7.844,000
7,048,000
7.371,500
7,121,500
1 7,121.500
5.723,500
r 5,723,500
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
0181,13
$189.99
$198,73
1207.63
0216.68
1264.04 22
26.533
28,633
26,783
26.933
27.083
27,833 23
$4,806,000
85,080,000
$5,323,000
15,592,000
15,666.000
$7.349,025 24
CFe_03A.K1.9_71141s2_2:2$ PM Pee. 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reaarvas & Carry -Over From Last Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of t % Tex Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscallaneoue Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper,
15 COP Service
18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
is Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelfing Units
24 Estimated Uenr Fees
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01.2G02
100% Tax Diversion
Fee Adj. 1992-93
5 Year Total 5 Yee: Total
Revised 7114192
Page 1
1992-93
1993.94
1994-95
1995-98
1996.97
1992-1997
1997-2002
10-Yeei Total
6,741,000
7,620,000
8,065.000
7,891,000
6,978,000
6.741.000
5,562,000
6.741.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
175,000
201,000
231,000
268,000
306,000
1,179.000
2,375.000
3,554,000
4,251,DOO
4,528,000
4,811.D00
5,097,000
5,387,000
24,074,000
39,690,000
$3,784,000
531,000
579,000
580,000
547,000
460.000
2,705,000
1,621,000
4,326,000
32,000
63.000
92,000
114,000
121,000
422,000
570.000
992,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,989,000
6,371,000
5,722,000
8,024,000
8.274,000
28,380,000
44,256,000
72,636,000
11,730,000
12,991,000
13,787,000
13,915.000
13.250.000
35,121.000
49.810,000
79,377,000
2,573.000
2,699,000
2,969,000
3.266,000
3,593,000
15,100,000
24,127,000
39,227,000
301,000
316,000
332,000
349,000
306,000
1,864,000
2,120,000
3,784.000
1,235,000
1,911,000
2,595,000
3,324,000
3,729,000
12,795,000
18,645,000
31,440,000
4,110,000
4.928.000
5.896,000
6,939,000
7.698.000
29,559,000
44,892,000
74,451,000
7.620.000
8.065,000
7,891,000
8.976,000
5.562,000
5.562,000
4,926,000
4,928,000
2,055,000
2,463,000
2.948,000
3,470,000
3,844,000
3.844.000
4,991,000
4,991,000
822,GGO
985,200
1,779,200
1,387,800
1,537,600
1,537.600
1,996,200
1,996.200
4,743.000
4,618,000
3,763,800
2,148.200
1130,400
180,400
12,061,200)
f2,061,2001
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
$99.25 $105.58 1111.91 $118.29 $124.73 0217.77 22
42,B30 42,890 42,990 43,090 43,190 43,690 23
$4,251.000 $4,528,000 44.811,000 15.097,000 15,387,000 $9,514,371 24
LF7_e3A.XLe_71M/e7_3M PMs P.Q. 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1% Tex Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
8 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Opar.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20 % Contingency Reserve
20 Portion Of insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite
24 Estimated User Foam
100% Tax Diversion
Fee Adj. 1992-93
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 Revised 7/14192
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pape 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
5-Year Tnrsl 5-Yaer Tntal
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995.98
1996-97
1992-1997
1997.2002
10-Year Total
13,799.000
17,783,000
21,228,000
23.856,000
25,841,000
13,799,000
27,628,000
13.799,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
840,000
966,000
1,111,000
1.278,000
1,470,000
5,665,000
11,405,000
17.070,000
8,399,000
8,584,OOO
8,784,000
9,000,000
9,231,000
43,998.000
51.480,000
95,478,000
1.114.000
1.378,000
1.592,000
1,755,000
1,888.000
7,727.000
11,730,000
19,457,000
147,000
124,000
159,000
791,000
199,000
920,000
970,000
1,790,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,500.000
11,052,000
11,646.000
12,224,000
12,788,000
58,210,000
75,585,000
133.795,000
24.299,000
28,835,000
32,874,000
36,080,000
38,629.000
72,009.000
103,213,000
147,594,000
2,798,000
2,933,000
3,226,000
3,549,000
3,904,000
18,410,DD0
28,214,000
42.624.000
1,588,D00
1,687,000
1,750.000
1,838,000
1,930,000
9.773,000
111198,000
19,971,000
211301000
3,007,000
4.042,000
4,852,000
5,167,000
19,198,000
25,835,000
45,033,000
8,516,000
7,607,000
9.018,000
10.239.000
11,001,000
44.391,000
63,247,000
107,828,000
17,703,D00
21,228,000
23,866,000
25,841,000
27.628,000
27,628,000
39,966,000
39,966,000
3,258,000
3,804,000
4,509,000
S.120.0130
5,501,000
5.501,000
6,959,000
5,959,000
1,303,000
1,521,000
1,804,000
2,048,000
2,200,000
2,200.000
2,783,000
2,783,OD0
13,222,DOO
15,903,000
17,543,000
18,673.000
19,927,000
19,927,OD0
30,224,000
30,224,000
684.64
086.33
$87.99
689.62
1191.19
$704.91
99,228
99,428
99,828
100.428
101,228
105,228
$8.399.000
08,584,000
$8,784,000
$9,000,000
49,237,000
011.039.469
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
8
7
8
9
10
11
72
13
14
15
18
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
CF11 s3A.xc3 71141s7 3:$1 PM P" 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Last Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tnx Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & O and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units
24 Eelimated User Fees
100% Tax Diversion
Fee Adj. 1992-93
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 Revised 7114192
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002
5-Yenr Total S.Yanr Total
1992-93
1993.94
1994-95
1995-96
1990-97
1992.97
1997-2002
10-Ye at Total
12, 240,000
13, 245,000
13, 580, 500
13,293,500
12,527,000
12. 2 40,000
11, 8 &0,000
12, 240,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
280.000
322,000
370.000
426,000
490,D00
1,888,000
3,804,000
5,592,000
6,707,000
5,080,000
6.470,000
7,128,0DO
7,79B.D00
33,181,000
53,173,000
86,354.000
901.000
946,000
947,000
913,000
862,D00
4,569,000
4570,000
9,139,000
66,000
126,000
155,000
174,000
181.000
702,000
900,000
1,602,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,954,000
7,474,000
7,942,000
8,641,000
9,329,000
40,340,000
62,447,000
102.787,000
19,194,000
20,719.000
21.522.500
21,934,500
21,956.000
52,580,000
74,307,000
115,027,000
2,809,000
2,943,000
3,237,000
3,561,000
3,917,000
18,467.000
26,307.000
42,774,000
865,D00
908,000
953,000
1,001,000
1,051,000
4,778,000
6,100,000
10,878.000
2,275.000
3,287,500
4,039,000
4.745,500
5,128,000
19,475,000
25,840,000
45,115,000
5,949,000
7,138,500
8,229,000
9,307,500
10,096,000
40,720,000
50,047,000
98,767,000
13, 24 5,000
13,580,600
13,293,500
12,627,000
11,860,000
1 1, 860,OD0
10, M,000
16,260,000
2,975,000
3,569,000
4.115,000
4,654,000
5,048,000
5,048,000
6,390,000
8,390,000
1,190.000
1,429,000
1,646,000
1,862,000
2,019,000
2,019,000
2,556,000
2,558,000
9,080,000
8,583,500
7,532,500
6,111,000
4,793,000
4,793,000
7,314,000
7,314,000
LINE
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
8
10
i1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
1112.09 $119.96 $125,73 $137.58 $149,47 $230.01 22
50,910 61,110 51,460 51,810 52,160 53,910 23
$5,707,000 $6,090.000 $8,470,000 t7.128,GOO $7,796,000 $12,399,839 24
r
8/13/92 CF 938.XLS_6:06 PM
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1% Tax Allocation
S Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Faas
7 Interest & Miscelienecus Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 'Share of Joint Works M & O
14 Collection System M & O and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Unapprop or Portion of Insurance Reserve
25% Tax Diversion
No Fee Adj. 1992-93
Fee adj. 1993-94
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 THRU 14 8/13/92
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
S-Year Total 5-Year Total
1992-93
1993-94
1994.95
1995.96
1996-97
1992-1997
1997.2002
10-Yaar Total
113,590.000
113.880,000
120,940.250
124,728.760
129,848, 600
113.690.000
131,928.600
113,590,000
25,046.000
28,672,000
27,739,000
28,849,000
30,005,000
138,911.000
109,023,000
307,934.000
5,895,000
8,780.000
7,797,000
8,987,000
10,313,000
39,752,000
79,980,000
119,732,000
62,288.000
67,812,000
77.624,000
88,034,000
98,626,000
384,184,000
589.075,000
973,269,000
8,129,000
8,389.000
8,763,000
9.031.000
9,278,000
43,588,000
53,662.000
97.250,000
1,868.000
2,011,000
2,380,000
2,679,000
2,797,000
11,735,000
13.885,000
25,620,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
93,826.000
111.464.000
124,303.000
137,560,000
151,017,000
618.170.000
905.625,000
1,523,795,000
207,416,000
225,344.000
245,243,250
262,288,750
279,885,600
731,760,000
1,037,653,500
1,037,385,000
48,648.000
61,011,000
56,112,000
61,724,000
67,898,000
285,393,000
455,978,000
741,369,000
11,316,000
10,121,000
10,622,000
11,150,000
11,703,000
54,912,000
67,822.000
122,734,000
33,572,000
43,271,750
63,780.500
80,566,250
68,336,000
259,526,500
341,112.070
600,038,570
93,536,000
104,403,750
120,514,500
133,440.250
147,937.000
599,831.600
864.910.070
1,464,741,670
113.880,000
120,940, 250
124.728,750
128, 848, 500
131,928,500
131,928,600
172,643,430
172.843,430
45,903,000
51,299,000
69,286,000
66,078,000
72,842.000
72.842,000
94,580,000
94,580,000
18,708,000
20.880.000
24.103,800
26,689,200
29,587,800
29,587,800
38,497,400
38,497.400
49,269.000 48,761,250 41,338,950 36.483,300 29,498,700
,svuar_=_va-r ::rags_sussrmTnesesrrs�.rvsssetrrsstf.=s�uuuu�:r�statnscnensrssssefsn.�t�sseursu++s:s�r..�
29.498,700
vf.:znnrttuvszr~•s.�vsuuvuvuKvrrruuvrnrr_tr�...
39,566,030
39,566,030
vvuvcsrvusnrseurss
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
8
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 USER FEE DATA
21
22 Single Family Residence User Fee $60.01 $77.76 $89.01 $100.61 $112.17
$141.86 22
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 844,704 846,374 849,594 854.124 859,609
889,584 23
24 Estimated User Fees, Excludes IRWD 50,688.000 66,812.000 75.824.000 85,934,000 96,426,000
126,199,416 24
.) t
CF1 e3A.xtkW17N2_2:24 M Opp 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
8 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
to TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19. 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserves
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units
24 Estimated User Fees
25% Tax Diversion
No Fee Adj. 1992-93
Fee Adj. 1993-94
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 Revised 8/13192
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
1992-1997 1997-2002
1992.93
1993-94
1994-95
1995.96
1998.97
6-Year Total
5-Year Total
10-Yee► Total
9,135 000
7,941.000
7,466,750
7,652.250
8,500.000
9,135.000
10 269,000
9,135,000
1.545,000
1.607.000
1,671.000
1,738.000
1,808,000
8,369,000
10.181.000
18,550,000
400,000
460.000
529.000
608.000
699,000
2,696.000
5.425.000
9,121.000
S,541,000
7,560,000
9,447,000
11,353,000
13.282,000
47.183,000
09,045,000
117.028.000
592.000
533,000
526,000
581,000
653,000
2,884,000
4,794,000
7,658,000
281.000
274,000
308,000
338,000
350,000
1,551,000
1,750,000
3.301.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8.359 000
10 434,000
12,480,000
14 598.000
16,792 000
62.863 000
91 995,000
154 058.000
17,494,000
18,276,000
19,946,750
22 250.250
25 292,000
71,798,000
102 264.000
163,793 000
4,675,000
4,902.006
5,392,000
5.931,000
6,524,000
27,424.000
43,810,000
71.234,000
650.000
683,000
717.000
753,000
791,000
3,594,000
4,595,000
8,189,000
4,328,000
5,223,250
6,185.500
7,068.250
7,708.000
30 511.000
38,540,000
89 051.000
9,S53,000
10.8091.250
12,294 500
13 750,250
15,023,000
01.529.000
88 045.000
148 474.000
7,841.000
7.466.750
7,852,250
B,Soo,000
10,269,0o0
10.269,000
15,319.000
15,319.000
4,827.000
5.404.000
6,147.000
6.875,000
7,512,000
7.612,000
9,613.000
9.613.000
1.931 000
2,162.000
2,459 000
2,750.000
3.005.000
3.005.000
3,845.000
3.845.000
1.083.000
199,2501
1953.750)
1.125.000)
1248 000)
1 4248,000)
1,861.000
1 1.881.000
$76.00
$102.23
$127.51
$152.80
$178.07
$184.49
73.880
73.950
74,090
74.300
74,590
77.090
$5,541,000
$7,580,000
09,447,000
$11,363.000
$13.282.000
$14,222.334
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
e
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Cr2 saAJMs_enu9: 12As P*_PaN r
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collectlon System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES.
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Furling Requirements
19. 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units
24 Estimated User Fees
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
25% Tax Diversion
No Fee Adj. 1992-93
Fee Adj. 1993-94
C.- V— Tnfd 1;- Vewr Tnfal
Revised 8/13/92
Pays 1
1992.93
1993.94
1994.95
1995-96
1996-97
1992-1997
1997-2002
1 O-Year Total
28,843 000
26 119.000
25,527,000
26,200,000
28.691 000
26.843 000
32,366,000
28 943.000
6.828.000
7.101.000
7.385.000
7,880.000
7,987,000
36.981,000
44,988,000
81.969.000
2.250.000
2,588.000
2,976,000
3.422.000
3,935,000
15.171.000
30,612,000
45.683.000
15,827,000
20.874.000
25,032.000
29,286,000
33,662.000
124,881,000
190,878,000
305,559.000
1.823,000
1,774,000
1.808.000
1,917.000
2.134.000
9,456,000
14,047,000
23,503,000
522.000
613,000
712,000
801,000
837.000
3,495.000
4,175.000
7.660.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
27,250,000
32 950.000
37,913,000
43,108,000
40,555,000
109,774 000
274 600.000
464 374.000
54,093,000
58 069 000
63,440,000
88 306.000
77,246,000
218 617,000
308 956,000
491,217,000
15.789.000
16,558.000
18,214.000
20.035.000
22.039,000
92,635,000
148,005,000
240.640,000
2,099,000
2,204,000
2,314.000
2.430.000
2,552,000
11,599,000
14.810,000
26,409,000
11 086.000
13.780.000
16,712,000
19 150.000
20,299.000
80,027,000
101 222.000
181.249.000
28,974,000
32 542.000
37,240 000
40,815,000
44,890 000
184,261 000
264,637,000
448 298.000
25.119.000
25.627.000
26.200,000
28,691.000
32,350.000
32.356,000
42,919.000
42.919,000
14.487,000
16.271.000
18,620.000
20,309,000
22,445,000
22,445,000
29.499.000
29,499.000
5,795,000
6,508,000
7,448,000
8,123.000
8,978 000
9.978,000
11 800,000
11 800.000
4,037,000
2,748,000
132,000
260.000
933 000
933,000
11620,000
1,620 000
$60.00
$78.96
$94.28
0109.59
$124.89
263,793
284,358
265.508
267.233
269.533
$16,827.000
$20,874.000
$25,032,000
$29.286.000
$33,662,000
6131.54
281.033
$38.987,081
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
UkO A%Ls_a/13122_2:02 PM Pp* 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1%Tax Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
8 User Fees
7 Interest A Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & O
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Open.
1S COP Service
18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19. 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion -of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units
24 Estimated User Fees
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
25% Tax Diversion
No Fee Adj. 1992-93
Fee Adj. 1993-94
ri-Ywwr Tetel &Vmr Tetad
31-
Revised 8113192
Page 1
1992-93
1993-94
1994.95
1995.96
1996-97
1992.1997
1997-2002
10-Year Toted
34.537 000
33,59a,000
35,457,000
35,734,000
38 068.000
34 537 000
34,310 000
34 537,000
8.749.000
9,099,000
9,463,000
9,842.000
10,238,000
47,389,000
57,659,000
105,048,000
1.900.000
2.185.000
2.513,000
2,890,000
3,324,000
12.812.000
25,772,000
38,584.000
16.848.000
21,307.000
24.297,000
27.334,000
30.400.000
120,188.000
198.930,000
319.116,000
2,507,000
2.535,000
2.610,000
2.828,000
2,573,000
12.853.000
13.836.000
28,689.000
506,000
687.000
800,000
915.000
978,000
3.886,000
4.890.000
8,776.000
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30,510 000
35 813 000
39,683,000
43.609 000
47 511,000
197 1211000
301.087 000
498 213,000
65,047,000
89,411,000
75 140,000
79,343,000
83 579.000
231 863.000
335.397 000
532,750.000
18.669,000
17.477.000
19.225,000
21,148,000
23,253,000
97,781.000
166,224,000
264.005,000
4,435,000
2,900,000
3.045,000
3.197,000
3.357.000
16,934.000
19.478.000
36,410.000
10,346,000
13,677,000
17 138,000
18,930 000
22 649,000
82,638,000
112,950 070
195 588,070
31,449,000
33 954.000
39,406,000
43,275 000
49,289,000
197 353,000
288'650 070
486 003.070
33.598,000
36,457.000
35.734,000
30,068,000
34,310,000
34,310,000
46.748,930
46,748.930
15,725.000
16.977,000
19.703,000
21,838,000
24,635.000
24,635.000
32.170.000
32,170.000
6,290,000
6,791,000
7 881 000
8,655,000
9.854 000
9 854.000
12,868 000
12 868.000
11,583,000
11.889.000
8,150,000
5.776,000
4179,000)
1179.000)
1700,930
1 1,708,930
$60.00
$75.78
$86.19
$96.59
$107.01
$169.33
280,800
281,165
281,895
282,990
284.085
289.660
$16,948,000
$21,307,000
$24,297.000
$27,334,000
$30,400,000
$46,135,595
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
cFe_s3A.xte s/I3rs3_2:Tf PM -Pace 1
LINE
1 OPERATING ND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & O
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18, Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units
24 Estimated User Fees
25% Tax Diversion
No Fee Adj. 1992-93
Fee Adj. 1993-94
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 Revised 8/13192
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
=.V... Tn0.1 wV.., Tnr.1
1992-93
1993.94
1994.95
1995-96
1996-97
1992-1997
1997.2002
10-Year Total
8,784,000
9,360,000
10,334,000
10,849,W
10,983,501)
8,784,000
10,988,500
9,784,000
2.112,000
2.198.000
2.284.000
2,375,000
2.470.000
11,437.000
13.918.000
25.363.000
50,000
58,000
67.000
77,000
89,000
341.000
887,000
1.028,000
1.990.000
2,884,000
3.039,000
3,217.000
3,398.000
14,508,000
19,796.000
34.304,000
632,000
694,000
745,000
789.000
773,000
3,613,000
3,808.000
7,419,000
314,000
124.000
164,000
146.000
131,000
869.000
630.000
1.499,000
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,098,000
5,936.000
6 289 000
8,584,009
6,861,000
30,768,000
30,835,000
69603.000
13,882,000
15,296,000
16,823,000
17,433,000
17,844,500
39.552.000
49,201,500
78,387,000
1,785.000
1.872.000
2,059.000
2,265,000
2,492,000
10.473,000
16,738.000
27.209,000
759,000
797.000
837,000
879.000
923,000
4,195,000
5,352,000
9,547,000
1,978,000
2,293,000
2,978,000
3,305,500
3,483,000
13 917 500
17.315.000
31,232,500
4,522,000
4,982,000
5,774,000
8,449,500
8,878,000
28 685 500
39,403,000
67,988,500
9,360,000
10.334,000
10,849.000
10,983,500
10,966,500
10,066,500
10,398,500
10,399,600
2.261,000
2,491.000
2.887.000
3.225,000
3.439,000
3,439,000
4,327,000
4.327.000
904,000
992,000
1 155,000
1,290,000
1,378,000
1,376,000
1,731,000
1,731,000
8 195 000
8 861 000
8 807 000
81468,500
S.151 ISM
8 151 500
4440,500
1 4,3409500
LINE
1
2
3
4
6
b
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
$75.00
$107.52
$113.45
$119.44
$125.46
$156.04
22
26,533
26,633
28.793
28,933
27.083
27,833
23
$1.990.000
$2,864.000
03.039.000
$3,217.000
$3,398.000
$4.343.081
24
CFe p3AJ Q.8 @1131a3 2A4 PM Pp* 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M S 0
14 Coaactlon System M At O and Other Oper.
is COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves d, Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19, 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units
24 Estimated User Fees
N
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
25% Tax Diversion
No Fee Adj. 1992-93
Fee Adj. 1993-94
5 Year Total 5 Year Total
Revised 8114/92
Pape 1
1992.93
1993-94
1994.95
1995.96
1996.97
1992-1997
1997-2002
10-Veer Total
8,741,000
7,239,000
7,655.000
7,450,000
6,501,000
0,741,000
5,051,000
0,741.000
1,100.000
1,144.000
11190,000
1,238,000
1,288.000
5,960.000
7.280,000
13.220,000
175.000
201,000
231.000
268,000
300,000
1.179.000
2,37S,000
3.554,000
2,784.000
3,384.000
3,621,000
3,859.000
4,099,000
17,747,000
32.425.000
50,172.000
517.000
550.000
657.000
613,000
424,000
2,561,000
1,388,000
3,949,000
32.000
63.000
92,000
114.000
121.000
422,000
570,000
992,000
O
0
0
0
O
O
O
0
4.608 000
5,342,000
5,691,000
5,990,000
8,238,000
27 869.000
44 018,000
71.887 000
11,349,000
12 651,000
13 346,000
13 440 000
12,739,000
34 610,000
48 069.000
78,628 000
2,573,000
2.599.000
2,969,000
3.266,000
3,593.000
16,100,000
24,127.000
39,227.000
301.000
316,000
332.000
349,000
365.000
1.854,000
2,120,000
3,784,000
1,236,000
1,911,000
2,595,000
3,324,000
3,729.000
12 795,000
18 645.000
31.440 000
4,110,000
4,926.000
5,896,000
6,939,000
7,688,000
29.569.000
44 892 000
74.461 000
7,239,000
7.655,000
7.450.000
6.501.000
6,051,000
6.051.000
4,177.000
4,177,000
2,055,000
2,463,000
2,948.000
3.470.000
3,844,000
3.844,000
4.991.000
4.991,000
822,000
985.200
1,179.200
1,387.800
1,637,600
11,537,600
1,996.200
1,998 200
4,362,000
4.208.800
34222,800
1 643 200
1330,600)
1330.600)
12,810,200)
1 (2.810,200)
$66.00
$78.91
$84.23
$89.56
494.91
42,830
42.890
42,900
43.090
43.190
$2.784.000
$3,384.000
$3,621,000
$3.859.000
$4,099,000
4181.98
43.690
$7,946.337
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
M 03AXLa_8I13102 5-60 PM -Ps" 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1%Tex Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
is TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19• 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite
24 Estimated User Fees
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
25% Tax Diversion
No Fee Adj. 1992-93
Fee Adj. 1993-94
5•Year Total G-Voar Total
Revised 8l13192
Page 1
1992.93
1993.94
1994-95
1995.96
1996.97
1992-1997
1997-2002
10-Year Total
13.799.000
18 636.000
19,997,000
22,535,000
24,423,000
13.799.000
26,106,000
13,799,000
3,323,000
3,456.000
3.594.000
3.738.000
3,888,000
17,999.000
21,904,000
39.903,000
840,000
966.000
1,111,000
1.278.000
1,470.000
5,665,000
11,405,000
17,070,000
3,969,000
5.128,000
5,190,000
5,262,000
5.343,000
24,892,000
28,010,000
52,902,000
1,074.000
1,294,000
1,502,000
1,858,000
1,784,000
7,312.000
10,903,000
18.215,000
147,000
124.000
159,000
191.000
199,000
820,000
970,000
1,790.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,353,000
10 968,000
11.558 000
12,127,000
12,684.000
50,688 000
73,192,000
129,880,000
23,152,000
27.604.000
31,553,000
34.682,000
37,107.000
70.487,000
99,298 000
143,679.000
2,798,000
2,933.000
3.226.000
3.649,000
3.904.000
18,410.000
26.214,000
42,824.000
1,588,000
1,667,000
1,750,000
1,838,000
1,930.000
8,773.000
11,198,000
19,971,000
2,130,000
3,007.000
4,042 000
4,852 000
5,167.000
19,198,000
25,835,000
45,033,000
6.518.000
7,807,000
9.018.000
10,239 000
11,001.000
44,381,000
63.247,000
107.828.000
16,636,000
19,997,000
22,535,000
24,423,000
26,106,000
28,106,000
36.051,000
38,051,000
3,258,000
3,804,000
4.509.000
5,120,000
5,501,000
5,501.000
6,959,000
6,959,000
1,303,000
1521000
1,804,000
2,048.000
2200000
2.200.000
2,783.000
2.783,000
12,075,000
14 672.000
16 222,000
17.255,000
18,40642
18,405,000
26,309,229__j
26,309,000
$40.00
$51.58
$51.99
$52.40
$52.78
99,228
99,428
99.828
100.428
101.228
$3,969,000
$6,128,000
85,190,000
$5,282,000
05,343,000
$54.95
105,228
$5,782,279
UNE
1
2
3
4
5
8
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
18
17
1a
19
20
21
22
23
24
CF11 93AALS a/131a2_10:62 AM Pmo 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Last Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation
6 Fees: Industrial Waste
8 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19. 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite
24 Estimated User Fees
25% Tax Diversion
No Fee adj. 1992-93
Fee adj. 1993-94
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 Revised 7114192
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
&V.., Tnt.1 rV— Tnf.1
1992-93
1993-94
1994.95
1995.96
1998-97
1992-97
1997-2002
O-Year Total
12 240.000
12,558,000
12 843.500
12,502,600
11 777.000
12,240.000
10,947,000
—1
12,240 000-
1.989.000
2.069,000
2.162.000
2,239.000
2,328,000
10,776,000
13,116,000
23.891,000
280.000
322,000
370.000
426,000
490,000
1,888,000
3.804,000
5.692.000
3,056.000
4,011,000
4,318.000
4.990,000
5.468.000
21.742,000
40.057.000
61,799.000
877.000
898,000
893.000
854,000
799,000
4,319.000
4,181.000
8.500.000
681000
126.000
155,000
174,000
181,000
702,000
900.000
1,602.000
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
8,267.000
7,424,000
7,808,000
9,582,000
9,266,000
38 427,000
82 057,000
101,484,000
18 607.000
19.982 000
20 731,600
21,084,500
21 043.000
61 667,000
73,004,000
113 724 000
2,809,000
2.943.000
3,237.000
3,561.000
3.917,000
16.467.000
26.307.000
42.774.000
866,000
908,000
953,000
1.001,000
1.051,000
4,779.000
6,100.000
10.879.000
2,275.000
3.287 500
4,039.000
4,746,500
5.128.000
19 475.000
25,040,000
45,115,000
5,949.000
7.138 500
8,229.000
9,307,500
10,096,000
40 720.000
58,047,000
98,787,000
12.558,000
12,843,500
12,502,500
11,777.000
10,947,000
10,947.000
14,957,000
14.957,000
2,975,000
3,569.000
4.115,000
4,654,000
5,048,000
6,049.000
8,390.000
8,390,000
1.190 000
1,428,000
1 646 000
1,882,000
2,019,000
2,019 000
2,566.000
2 556,000
8,393 000
7 848,500
8,741 500
5 261 LOW—
3,800.000
3,080,000
6 011 000
84011,000
$60.00
$78.48
$83.91
$94.38
$104.84
$177.45
50.910
51,110
61,460
61,010
52,160
63,910
$3,055,000
$4.011,000
$4.319,000
$4,890.000
65,468,000
$9.666,330
LINE
1
2
3
4
S
8
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
18
17
19
19
20
21
22
23
24
6113192 CF 93B.XLS 9:37 AM
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Cetry-Over from Last Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
a User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
$ Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & O
14 Collection Syetam M ♦4 0 snd Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Unepprop or Portion of Insurance Reserve
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 THRU 14
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002
100% Tax Diversion
NO Fee Adj. 1992-93
Fee Adj. 1993-94
5-Yaar Total 5-Year Torsi
8113102
Papa 1
1992-93
1993.94
1994-95
1996-96
1996.97
1992-1997
1997-2002
10-Year Total
113,690,000
87,273,000
92,341,250
94.014.750
95,835,500
113,590,000
98,438,500
113,590,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,895,000
6,780,000
7.797,000
8,967,000
10,313,000
39,752.000
79,980.000
119,732,000
52,288,000
94,286.000
105.387.000
116,882,000
128,825,000
497,467,00D
759,671,000
1,257,138,000
7,168,000
8,398,000
6,824.000
6,733,000
6,805,000
33,726,000
38,415,1300
72,141,000
1,889,000
2.011,000
2,380.000
2,679,000
2,797,000
11,735,000
13,885,000
25,620,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
67.219,000
109.472,000
122.188.000
136,261,000
148,540,000
582,680,D00
891,99I,DO0
1.474.631,000
180,809,000
196,745,000
I14,629,260
229.275,750
244,375,500
696,270,000
9881389.500
1,588,221,000
48,648,000
61,011,000
56,112,000
61,724.000
67.698,000
286,393,D00
455,978,000
741,369,000
11.316,000
10,121,000
10,622,000
11,150,000
11,703,000
54,912,000
07,822,000
122,734,000
33.572,000
43,271.750
53,780,600
60,566,260
68,336,DOO
259,526,600
341,112.070
600,638,570
93.539,000
104.403,750
120,514,600
133,440.250
147.937.000
599,831,500
864,910,070
1,454,741,670
87,273,000
92.341,250
94,014,760
96,835,500
96,438,500
96,438,500
123,479,430
123,479,430
45,903,000
51,299,000
59,288.000
65,576,000
72,842,000
72,842.000
94,580,000
94,580,000
18.708,000
20,880,000
24.103,8D0
26,689,200
29.587,800
29,587,800
38,497.400
38,497.400
22,662,000
.���„�_s_�__�rr�nrsier_rr_zrrr_zrrrsrs_ti=vvu�.zvinrr.��-r�uwvv,evvusswrn,rs-r�avrrrr__r�_
20,162,250
10,624,950
3,47D,300
(5,991,300)
(5,991,300)
rrrnsnnnnarcnnnnnnrvnrr_vrn-.rss-ssr_
19,597,970)
(9,597,970)
rr_va�.wu.
UNE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
f
f
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
if
1f
20
21
USER FEE DATA
21
22
Single Family Residence User Fee 11160.01 4109.27 $121.89 6134.39 $147,07
$183,49 22
23
Number of Equivaient Dwelling Units 644.704 1346,374 $49,594 954,124 059,609
889,584 23
24
Estimated User Fees, Excludes IRWD 50,888,000 92,485,000 103,387,000 114,782,000 126,425,000
183,232,779 24
CF1-03A.xi S_afi]n7_Y:6e AM_rq. I
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation
G Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
>! Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Col5ection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Yesr's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserves
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units
24 Estimated User Fees
100% Tax diversion
No Fee Adj. 1992-93
Fee Adj. 1993-94
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 Revised 7114193
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe I
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
1992-1997 1997-2002
1992.93
1993-94
1994-95
1995.96
1996-97
5-Year Total
5-Year Total
10-Year Total
9.135,000
6,239,000
5,748,750
5,907,250
61519,000
9.135,0()0
8.142.000
9.135,D00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
400,000
460,000
529,000
608,000
699,000
2,896,000
5.425.000
8,121,000
6,541.000
9.157,000
11.119.000
13,091.000
15,090,000
54,008,000
80,028,000
134,036,000
535,000
415,000
399,000
425,000
507,000
21291.000
3,889,000
6,170,000
281,000
274,000
308,000
338.000
360,000
1,551,000
1,750,000
3.301,000
0
0
0
a
a
0
0
0
5,757,000
10,310,000
12,365,000
14,4a2 O00
16.646 000
80,536.000
91.092,000
151,628,000
15,892,000
16,5S5,000
18,101,750
20,289,250
23,1a5,000
89,671,000
99,234,000
160.763.000
4.575.000
4,902.000
5.392,000
5,931.000
6.524.000
27.424,000
43,810.000
71,234.000
550,000
083.000
717,000
753,000
791.000
3,594,000
4.695,000
8.189,000
4,328,000
5,223,250
8,185,500
7,006,250
7,708,000
30,511,000
38,640,000
69,051,000
9,653,000
10,808,2SO
12,294,500
13,750,250
15,023,000
61,529,000
88,945.000
148,474,000
8,239,000
5,746,750
5,807.250
6.519,000
8.142,000
8,142,000
12,299,000
12,289,000
4,827,000
5,404,000
6,147,000
6,875,000
7,Si2,000
7,512,000
9,613,000
9,613.000
1,931.000
2,162.000
2,459,000
2,750,000
3,005.000
3.005,000
3.845,000
3.845.000
(519,000)
0,819,2501
12,798,7501
13,108,0001
12,375,0001
12.375,DOOI
(1,189,0001
11,189,000)
$76.00
11 23.96
$150.07
$176.19
1202.31
$213.02
73,090
73,950
74,090
74.300
74.590
77,090
15,541,000
69,187.000
•11,119,000
613.091,000
$15,090.000
618,421.712
LINE
1
2
3
4
6
6
7
8
a
To
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
CF2 91AALa el1V92 e:13 AM Pap. 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUNQ
2 Reserves & Cerry-Over From Last Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1% Tax Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Feee
7 Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTALREVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
100% Tax Diversion
No Fee Adj. 1992-93
Fee Adj, 1993-94
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 Revised 7114192
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2DO2
5- Yaar Total 5- Yeer Tnt.l
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1998-97
1992-1997
1997-2002
10-Year Total
26,843,000
16.040,000
17,926,000
18,040,000
19,930,000
26,643,000
22,948,000
26,843,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,250,D00
2,588,000
2,978,000
3,422,000
3.935,000
15,171,000
30,512.000
45,883,000
15,827,000
27,974,000
32,418.000
36,964,000
41,646,000
154,827,000
225,882,000
380,689,000
1,572,000
1,253,000
1,260,000
1.316,000
1,490,000
6,883,000
10,044.000
16,927.000
522,000
613,OD0
712,000
801.000
837,000
3,495,000
4,175.000
7,860,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20,171,000
32,428,000
37,354,000
42 505,000
47,908,000
180,368,D00
270.593,000
450,959,000
47014,000
50,468,000
55,280,000
50,545000
07.838,000
207,209,000
293,541,000
477,802,000
15,789,000
18,558,000
10,214,000
20,035,D00
22,039,000
92,535,D00
148,005,000
240,840,000
2.099.000
2,204,000
2,314.000
2,430,000
2,552.000
11,599,000
14,810,000
26.409,000
11,086,000
13,780,000
18,712,000
18,150,000
20 299,000
80,027,000
101,222.000
181 249,000
28,974.000
32,542,000
37,240,000
40,615,D00
44,890,D00
194,261,000
264,037,000
448,298,000
18,040,0D0
17.920,000
18,040,000
19,930,000
22,948,000
22,948,000
29,504,000
29,604,000
14,467,000
18.271,000
18,820,000
20,308.000
22,445,000
22.445,000
29,499.000
29,499,000
5,795,000
8,508,000
7,449,000
8,123,000
8,978,000
8,978,D00
11,800.000
11,800.000
12,242,0001
(4,853,0DM
(8,02B4O001
18,501,00M
(8,475,000)
(8,475,ODO)
(11,795.000)
(11,795,0001
LINE
1
2
3
4
6
e
7
8
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
15
17
18
19
20
21
22 Single Family Residence User Fee 180.00 8105.82 $122.09 $138.32 6154.51 $186.1 1 22
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units 263,7B3 264.358 255,508 267,233 269,533 281,033 23
24 Estimated User Fees 115,827,000 $27,974,000 132,416,000 $36,984,000 $41,645,000 846.882.392 24
CF7 s3A.xLs ef131s3 sa■ AM Ppr t
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves G Carry,Over From Lost Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tex Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
6 User Fees
7 Interest & Miscellenenus Income
8 TTansfar from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M 6 0
14 Collection System M i 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves 6 Carty -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Rasidence User Fee
23 Numbar of Equivalent Dwelling Units
24 Estimated User Fees
100% Tax Diversion
NO Fee Adj. 1992-93
Fee Adj. 1993-94
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 Revised 7l14192
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pape 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992,1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
5-Year Total 5-Year Total
1992-93
1393.94
1994-95
1995-96
1996-97
1992-1997
1997-2002
10-Year Total
34,537,000
24,512.000
25,813,000
25,196,000
24,719,000
34,537,000
22.084,000
34,537,000
0
a
o
0
0
0
0
0
1,900,000
2.185,000
2,513.000
2,890,000
3,324,000
12.812,000
25,772,000
39,584.000
16.848,000
30,408,000
33.750,000
37,178,000
40,633.000
158,925.000
250,591,000
415,419.000
2,170.000
1.835,000
1,858,000
1.817,000
1,899,000
9.377,000
8,345,DDO
17.722,000
608,000
607,000
800,000
915,000
978,000
3,888,000
4,990,000
8,77e,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21,424.000
35,115,000
39,929,000
42,798,D00
46,634,000
184.900,000
295.598,000
480.498,000
55,961.000
69,827,000
84,602,000
67,994,000
71,353,000
219,437,000
317,882,000
515,035,000
15,668,000
17,477.000
19,225,000
27,14B4O00
23.283,001)
97.781,000
155,224,000
254,005.000
4,435,000
2,900,000
3,045,000
3,197.000
3.357.000
15.934,000
19,478,000
35.410.000
10,348,000
13,577,000
17,136,000
18,930,000
22,849,000
82,638,000
112,950,070
195,588,070
31.449.000
33,954,000
39.406,000
43,275,000
49,269,000
197,353,000
288,650,070
486,003.070
24,512,000
25,673,000
25,196.000
24,719.000
22.084,000
22,084,000
29,031,930
29,031,930
15,726,000
16,977.000
19.703,000
21,038,000
24.035,000
24,635.000
32,170.000
32,170.000
8.290.000
8,791,000
7,881,000
8.655,000
9,854,000
9.854,000
12,868,000
12,888.000
2,497.000
1,905.000
f2,388,0001
(5,674.0001
f12,405,0001
112,405,0001
118,008,0701
(18.006,070)
$60.00 9108.15
200,800 281,105
118,848,000 $30.408.000
$118.78 $131.37 1143.03
281,895 202,990 284,085
$33.700.000 137,176,000 $40.833,000
0 202.3 4
289,660
IISS.589,570
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
a
7
8
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
18
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
CF6 a3A.XLa_af1"2 e:22 AAr Pp" 1
LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
2 Reserves 6 Carry,Over From Lost Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tax Allocation
5 Fees: Industrial Waste
8 User Fees
7 Interest 6 Wocellansou■ Income
e Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M 6 0
14 Collection System M i 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry Over to Next Year
is Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
100% Tax Diversion
No Fee Adj. 1992-93
Fee Adj. 1993-94
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 Reviaad 7114/92
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002
S-Vwwr 7nrw1 SVwwr Tnrwt
1992-93
1993.94
1994-95
1995.98
1996.97
1992-1997
1997-2002
10-Yesr Total
8,794,000
7,170,OD0
7,983,000
8,328,000
8,274,500
8,784,000
8,058,500
8,784.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
50,000
58,000
67,000
77,000
69,000
341,000
687,000
1.028,000
1,990,OD0
5,060.000
5.323,000
5,592,000
5.868,000
23,833,000
33,713,DDO
57.546,000
S54,000
533,000
573,000
583.000
574,000
2,817,000
2.567.000
5,384,000
314,000
124,000
154,000
148,000
131,000
869.000
830,000
1,499.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,908,000
5,775,000
6,11T 000
6,398,000
6,682,000
27.B80.OD0
37.597.000
65,457,000
11,69I,000
12,945,000
14,100,000
14724,000
14,936,500
38.544,000
45,855,500
74,241000
1.796.000
1.872,000
2.059,000
2,285,000
2,492,ODO
10,473.000
18,736,000
27,209,DOD
759,000
797.000
$37.000
879,000
923,000
4.195,000
5,352,000
9,547,000
1,979,D00
2,293,000
2,878,D00
3 305,500
3,483,ODO
13,917,5DO
17,315,OD0
31,232,S00
4,522,000
4,982,000
5,774,000
8,449,500
8,878,000
28,585,5DO
39,403,000
67 988,500
7,170,000
7,983,OD0
8,326,000
8,274,500
6,058,500
8,058,600
6,252,600
8,252,SDO
2,261,000
2,481.000
2,887.000
3.225,000
3.439,000
3,439.000
4,327,000
4,327,000
904,000
992,000
1,155,000
1,290,000
1,378,000
1,378,000
1,731,000
1,731,000
4,006,000
4,510.000
4,284,000
3.759,500
3,243,500
3,243,500
194,500
1194,500
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
22 Single Family Residence User fee $75.00 6189.98 $198,73 $207.63 0216.06 4264.04 22
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite 26,533 28,033 26,783 26,933 27,083 27,833 23
24 Estimated User Fees $1,990,000 15,060,D00 95,323.000 65,592,000 15,888,000 87,349,025 24
CFe_93A.xl9J113/92 e:2e AM P.e. r
LINE
1 OPERATING _ --ING FUND
2 Reserves & Carry -Over From Last Year
3 REVENUE
4 Share of 1 % Tax Altocetion
5 Fees: Industrial Wavle
6 User Fees
7 interest & Miscellaneous Income
8 Transfer from COP Funds
9 Other Revenue
10 TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & O and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Urtits
24 Estimated User Fees
100% Tax Diversion
No Fee Adj. 1992-93
Fee Adj. 1993-94
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 6 Revised 7/14192
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002
S Yeer Total 5 Year Tnt,J
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-90
1996-97
1992.1997
1997-2002
10-Year Total
6,741,000
6097,000
6,425,000
6,125,000
5,074,000
6,741,000
3,514,000
6.741,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
175.000
201,000
231,000
288,000
306,D00
1.179,000
2,375,000
3,554,000
2,784,000
4,528,000
4.911,000
5,097.000
5,387,000
22,907,000
39,690,000
82,297,000
475,DO0
452,000
462,000
411.D00
314,000
2,124,000
700.000
2,824.000
32,000
53,000
92,000
114,DD0
121.D00
422,000
570.000
992,D00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,466,000
5,254,000
5,596,000
6,888,000
6,128,DD0
28,332,000
43,335,000
69,887,000
10,207,000
11,351,000
12,021,000
12,013,D00
11,202,000
33,073,000
48,849,000
76.408,000
2,573,000
2,899,000
2,969,000
3,206,000
3,593,000
15,100,000
24,127,DDO
39,227,000
301,000
318,000
332,000
349,000
366,000
1.664,000
2,120.000
3,784,0D0
1,236,000
1,911,000
2.595,000
3.324.000
3,729,000
12,795,000
18,845,000
31.440.000
4,110,000
4,920,000
5,898 DOO
6,93.9,000
7,688,000
29,559,000
44,892,000
74,461,000
6.097,000
8,425,000
8,125,000
5,074,000
3,514,000
3.514.000
1,957,000
1,957.000
2,055,000
2,483,000
2,948,000
3,470,D00
3,844.000
3,844,000
4.991.000
4,991,000
822,000
985.200
1,179,200
1,387,800
1,537 800
1,537,600
1,998,200
1,990,200
3,220,000
2,976,800
1,997,800
216,200
(1,887,600)
1.1,867,800)
(5,030,200)
(5,030,200)
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
e
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
18
17
18
19
20
• 21
165.00 1105.58 1111.91 $119.29 $124.73 $217.77 22
42,830 42,890 42,990 43,090 43,100 43,590 23
12.784.000 $4,528,000 14,911,000 $5.097.000 05.397.000 $9.514,371 24
CF7-e3A.xLa 4113A2 9:2s AM Pq 1
LINE
1
OPERATING FUNQ
2
Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3
REVENUE
4
Share of I % Tex Allocation
6
Face: Industrial Waste
6
User Fees
7
Interest 6 Miscellaneous Income
8
Transfer from COP Funds
9
Other Revenue
10
TOTAL REVENUE
TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Share of Joint Works M & 0
14 Ccilection System M & 0 and Other Oper.
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry -Over to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Pardon of insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Units
24 Eetimated User Fees
100% Tax Diversion
No Fee Adj. 1992-93
Fee Adj. 1993-94
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 7 Revised 7114192
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
S-Ywer Tnsnl 5-Year T.W
1992.93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-98
1996.97
1992-1997
1997.2002
10-Year Total
13,799,D00
13,190.000
16,298,000
18,564,000
20,160,000
13,799,000
21,530,000
13,799,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
840,000
986,000
1,111,000
1,278,000
1,470,000
5,666,000
11.405,000
17,070.000
3,969,000
8,584,000
8,78 4,000
9,000,000
9,231,000
39,568.000
51,490,000
91,048,000
951,000
1,041,000
1,230,000
1,366,000
1,471,000
8,059,000
9,134,000
15,193,D00
147,000
124,ODO
159,000
191,000
199,000
920,000
970,000
1,790,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,907.000
10,715,000
11.284,000
11,935,000
12.371.000
52,112,000
72,989,000
125,101,000
19,706,D00
23,905,000
27.582.000
30,399,000
32,531,000
05.911,000
94,519.000
138,900,000
2.798.000
2,933,000
3,226,000
3,549,000
3,904,000
18,410.000
26,214,000
42,824,000
1,588.000
1,867.000
1,750,000
1,838.000
1,930,000
8.773.000
11,198,000
19.971,000
2,130,000
3,007.000
4,042,000
4,852,000
5,167,000
19,198,000
25,835,000
45,033,000
6,516,000
7,607,000
9,018,000
10,239,000
II'DO1,000
44,381.000
63,247,000
T07,828,000
13,190,000
18,298,000
18,564,000
20,160,000
21,530,000
21,630,000
31,272,000
31,272,000
3,258,000
3,804,000
4,509,000
5,120,000
5,501,000
5,501,600
8,959,000
8,959,000
1,303,000
1,521,000
1.804,000
2,048,000
2,200,000
2,200,000
2,783,000
2,783,000
6,629,000
10,973,000
12,251,000
12,992,000
13.829,000
13,829,000
21,530,000
21,530,000
140.00
$88.33
$87.99
$89.62
$91-19
$104.91
99.228
99,428
99,828
100,428
101,228
105,228
$3,969,000
18,584,000
18,784,0DO
$9,000,000
$9,231.000
111,039,469
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
18
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
M 19)A.xt9_e113raz e:5I1 AM Prq I
LINE
1
OPERATING FUND
2
Reserves & Carry -Over From Lest Year
3
REVENUE
4
Shete of 1 % Tex Allocation
5
Fees: Industrial Waste
6
User Fees
7
Interest & Miscellaneous Income
8
Transfer from COP Funds
9
Other Revenue
10
TOTAL REVENUE
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING
12 EXPENDITURES
13 Shete of Joint Works M & 0
14 Collection System M & O and Other Oper,
15 COP Service
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
17 Reserves & Carry-Ovat to Next Year
18 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Requirements
19 20% Contingency Reserve
20 Portion of Insurance Reserve
21 USER FEE DATA
22 Single Family Residence User Fee
23 Number of Equivalent Dwelling Unite
24 Estimated User Fees
100% Tax Diversion
No fee Adj. 1992-93
Fee Adj. 1993-94
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 Revised 7114192
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
5Neer Tarel 5-Yaer Toral
1992.93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-95
1996-97
1992.97
1997-2D02
10-Year Total
12,240,000
10,496,000
10.829 500
10,125,500
9,226,000
12.240,000
8,209,000
12,240.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
200,000
322,000
370,000
426,000
490,000
1,889,000
3,804,000
5,692,000
3,055,000
6,080,000
6,470,400
7,128,000
7,796,000
30,529,000
53,173,0D0
83,702,000
904,000
744,000
730,000
600,000
612,000
3,570,000
3,017,000
6,587,000
66,OD0
126,000
155,000
174.000
181,000
702,000
900,000
1,602,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,205,000
7,272r000
7,725,000
8,408,000
9,079,000
38,689,000
80,894,000
97,583,000
16,445,000
17,768,000
18,354,500
18,533.500
18,3135,000
48,929,000
159.103,000
109,823,000
2,809,000
2,943,000
3,237.t100
3,561,000
3,917,000
16.467.000
28.307.000
42.774,000
865,000
908,000
953,000
1,001.000
1,051,000
4,778,000
8.100,D00
10,878,000
2,275,000
3,2137,500
4,039,000
4,745.500
5,128.000
19,475,000
25,640,000
45.115,000
5,949,000
7,138,500
8,229,000
9,307,500
10,096,000
40,720,000
58,047,000
98,767,000
10,496,000
10,829,500
10,125,500
9,228,000
8,209,000
8,209,000
11,056,000
11,056,000
2,975,000
3.569,000
4,115,000
4,654,000
5,048,000
5,048,000
6,390.000
8,390.000
1,190,000
1,428,000
1.646,000
1,862,000
2.019,ODO
2,019,000
2,556,000
2,556,000
6,331.000
5,532,500
4,364,500
2,710,000
1,142,000
1,142,000
2,110.000
2,110,000
LINE
1
z
3
4
5
6
7
9
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
1160.00 0118.96 $125.73 0137.58 $149.47 $ 230.01 22
50,910 51,110 61,460 51,810 52,160 63,910 23
43,055,000 $6,080,000 $6,470.000 117,128,000 97,798,000 $12.399,839 24
SELECT COMMITTEES
; •ti •.. P`C6pp
—1'-•
CHAIRMAN.
(�W�' 1Y�
PLANNING FOR
pC
CALIFORNIA'S GROWTH
INFANT AND CHILD CARE
AND DEVELOPMENT
SOURCE REDUCTION AND
-ECYCLING MARKET
•" '
-ELOPMENT
hC'! lIs OAKy4E
Cariforniar 6tarte *cnate
MARIAN BERGESON
SENATOR
THIRTY-SEVENTH DISTRICT
CHAIRMAN
LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE
September 1, 1992
Mr. William D. Mahoney, Chairman
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Dear Mr. Mahoney:
STANDING COMMITTEES:
CHAIRMAN.
4OCAL GOVERNMENT
APPROPRIATIONS
ELECTIONS & REAPPORTIONMENT
HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
NATURAL RESOURCES
TRANSPORTATION
Thank you for your recent letter to my Capitol office
regarding your Board's opposition to the elimination of all
property tax revenues for Enterprise Special Districts.
As you well know, this would be a significant impact on these
districts. It means, as you pointed out, that all affected
districts would have to cut administrative costs and/or raise
rates dramatically to compensate for the loss. It is for
this reason that I was unable to support Assembly Bill 3214
(Isenberg).
I understand why the Governor has chosen to look at enter-
prise districts which continue to receive tax funds.
Following the passage of Proposition 13 and the enabling
legislation, Assembly Bill 8, certain districts were
subsidized by local property taxes. However, many enterprise
districts do not receive property taxes; their customers
already pay the full price of their services through rates
and fees.
In effect, customers of the affected enterprise districts
such as myself are subsidized in relation to other district
customers. At some point in time, I agree that it would be
reasonable to look at an appropriate approach to resolving
this fundamental inequity.
I believe it is important to delay any consideration of
enterprise districts until we have a clearer understanding of
fundamental tax issues. Then, as we investigate opportu-
PITOL OFFICE STATE CAPITOL. SACRAMENTO. CA 95814 TELEPHONE, 1916) 445-4961
ORANGE COUNTY 140 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE- SUITE 120. NEWPORT REACH. CA 9266D TELEPHONE-. 47141 640-1137
.. WESTERN RIVERSIDE! 27403 YNEZ ROAD. SUITE 217. TEMECULA. CA 92390 TELEPHONE: {7141 676-6808
NORTHEASTERN SAN DIEGO COUNTIES
-z-
nities to improve the system, we must make transitions
slowly. In my view, it would be important to include members
of the affected enterprise districts in these discussions.
You mention the "super -pot" proposal which would eliminate
all property tax revenues of special districts and transfer
them to a Super Special District Augmentation Fund. I do not
support that approach and continue to believe that Senator
Farr's amendments provide a much better solution.
Thank you for taking the time to provide me with your
perspective on the issue. It is always most helpful to hear
from affected agencies. I look forward to continuing to work
with you and other members of the water and sanitation boards
on matters of mutual concern.
Cordially,
;';7
MARIAN BERGE50N
senator, 37th District
MB:hvk
September 1, 1992
Pricing Book for:
County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 39 69 7 & 11 of
Orange County, California
$9815009000
Certificates of Participation
Capital Improvement Program
1990-92 Series C
�'A �
� Merrill hynch
Mo
$98,5009000
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 & 11
,MO./ of Orange County, California
1990-92 Series C Pricing Book
Table of Contents
to Summary of Financing . . . . . . . . . . . 1
WW Financing Team . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Financing Calendar . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Marketing Materials 4
�. New Issue Calendars 5
- Transaction Structure . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Historical Program Rate Performance 7
News Articles . . . . . . . . 8
Closing Memo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
no
ow
tow
UW I.W/
UW
42
The County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 & 11 of Orange County (the Districts) negotiated the sale
of $98,500,000 Certificates of Participation (Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Series C) on Tuesday,
September 1, 1992. Merrill Lynch & Co. served as the Districts' underwriter, while Mudge Rose Guthrie
Alexander & Ferdon and Rourke & Woodruff served as the Districts' co -special counsel. The issuance was
backed by a Standy Bond Purchase Agreement provided by Federal Guaranty Insurance Company
Securities Purchase, Inc., as well as Municipal Bond New Issue Insurance provided by Federal Guaranty
,r Insurance Company. The ratings assigned to the issue are accordingly the same as the ratings of the
Liquidity Facility provider: AAA/A-1+ by Standard & Poor's Corporation, and Aaa/VMIG 1 by Moody's
Investors Service. The proceeds from this financing are being used to finance the cost of acquisition and
construction of various projects, which consist of certain jointly owned sewage treatment and disposal
facilities and certain trunk sewer lines owned by Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 11. Additional proceeds will
be used to reimburse the participating Districts for the cost of individually owned trunk sewer lines and
jointly owned sewage treatment and disposal facilities.
tow
Based on current market conditions, the pending California State budget and subsequent note issuance, and
the Districts' need for capital, the finance team chose to implement a variable rate financing and selected
kEW Tuesday, September 1 as the date to price and sell the Districts' certificates. A variable rate transaction
was determined to be beneficial for several reasons. First, the steepness of the yield curve in recent years
has been such that a significant advantage exists between current short-term rates and long-term rates.
Close monitoring of the Districts' Series A issuance reveals this trend as the issue has continuously
"" performed below even very attractive long term fixed rates (see Tab 7).
Secondly, while there has been some flattening of the yield curve in recent months due to Federal Reserve
eases and attempts in Washington to stimulate the economy, the difference between short-term and long-
term rates is still significant enough to warrant the variable rate structure. Before finalizing the financing
structure, the Districts weighed all options and approached the rating agencies to ensure that the Districts'
underlying ratings would not be adversely effected should a variable rate structure be decided upon. To the
t� f contrary, Moody's Investors Service upheld the Aa rating assigned to the Districts in 1990, while Stand &
Poor's Corporation upgraded the Districts by an impressive two notches, from A to AA-. In addition to
rating agency considerations, the Districts examined the arbitrage benefits of traditional versus synthetic
variable rate debt. Ultimately, the financing team recognized the benefits associated with short-term debt
and developed a financing plan based on several premises: Because the Districts spend proceeds in less
than two years, monies set aside for construction are free from certain arbitrage restrictions. Therefore, by
investing the proceeds in taxable instruments while concurrently paying tax-exempt rates, the Districts
recognize an arbitrage benefit which could not be achieved through the issuance of fixed rate debt. Should
the Districts choose to lock -in low long- term fixed interest rates at some later date, a provision exists for
the Districts to convert their variable rate certificates to fixed rate certificates. Such a scenario has been
developed for Series A. The net result is arbitrage benefit during construction, while capitalizing on
attractive fixed rates if the Districts recognize this as an opportunity at some later date.
M+ Finally, the Districts' reserves were viewed as a natural hedge against a certain amount of variable rate
debt. Accordingly, the cost of the Districts' variable rate debt should move in tandmem with the Districts'
earnings on invested reserves locking in a predictable spread between the two.
tud
Preliminary Marketing for the Districts' issue began during the week ending August 28, 1992 with the
mailing of the District's disclosure document, the Preliminary Official Statement (P.O.S.), to over 120
institutional buyers. Merrill Lynch also mailed internal marketing materials to its network of over 300
'mod institutional Financial Consultants around the nation. Concurrently, the Merrill Lynch short-term
underwriting desk began to solicit interest for the upcoming offering among institutional investors. Daily
Rate issues, which have a minimum denomination of $100,000 and for which the interest is reset on a daily
t.W basis, are typically sold primarily to institutional investors such as tax-exempt money market funds and bank
trusts.
kwjl-..
Merrill laynch
eel
On Monday, August 31, Merrill Lynch began preliminary pricing of the Districts' certificates. It was agreed
that a preliminary pricing rate of 2.70% would be established as the rate matched the rate of the Districts'
-MOO, Series A certificates on August 31. While rates have remained relatively constant for the last several weeks,
it is anticipated that should the California State Legislature approve a budget this week, the State's $1.5
billion of notes could enter the market immediately. Given the sudden increase of tax-exempt daily paper,
there may be some fluctuation in the Districts' rates as the market attempts to absorb the influx of supply.
.■
Closing for the Districts' issuance occurred on Tuesday morning, September 1, at the offices of Mudge
Rose in Los Angeles. Members of the finance team were present with Patti Gorczyca representing the
Districts. Merrill Lynch confirmed the initial rate at 2.70%. At approximately 8:00 a.m. PST, Merrill
no Lynch sent the net purchase price of the certificates by wire transfer to the Districts' Trustee bank for the
transaction, State Street Bank & Trust Company of California, N.A.
Merrill hynch
I - am
y �Merri116yncle
WW
$98,500,000
County Sanitation Districts
Nos.1, 2, 3, 6, 7 & 11 of
Orange County, California
Certificates of Participation
Capital Improvement Program
1990-92 Series C
Issuer
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
taw
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
wo
Gary G. Streed (714) 962-2411 (x2500)
Patricia M. Gorczyca (714) 962-2411 (x2504)
FAX: (714) %2-3954
too
Co -Special Counsel
Rourke & Woodruff
701 So. Parker Street, Suite 600
Orange, CA 92668
,ad
Alan R. Watts (714) 558-7000
FAX: (714) 835-7787
tffld
Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon
333 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 2020
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Edward W. Long (213) 613-2301
Carolyn Clark (213) 613-2342
Brant Freer (213) 613-2309
FAX: (213) 680-1358
�'�►`�
Underwriter
Merrill Lynch & Co.
400 S. Hope Street, Suite 2020
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Stephen R. Coma (213) 683-4696
Melissa Waters (213) 683-4625
FAX: (213) 683-4514
Underwriter's Counsel
law
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
777 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3200
Los Angeles, CA 90071
45V
Eugene Carron (213) 612-2405
Brian Whitley (213) 612-2350
FAX: (213) 612-2499
M+
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
599 Lexington Avenue, 29th Floor
New York, NY 10022
too
Leon J. Bijou (212) 326-8876
FAX: (212) 326-8900
Trustee
`sd State Street Bank & Trust Company
725 S. Figueroa St., Suite 3100
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Steve Rivero (213) 362-7345-
FAX: (213) 362-7357
As of 8/28/92
Trustee's Counsel
Morrison & Foerster
611 Anton Boulevard, 9th Floor
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Andrew Bernstein (714) 251-7500
FAX: (714) 251-0900
Insurer
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
175 Water Street
New York, NY 10003-4972
John Van Cott (212) 607-3070
FAX: (212) 607-3093
Other
Brown & Wood
One World Trade Center, 59th Floor
New York, NY 10048
Micheal Kohler (212) 839-5306
FAX: (212) 839-5599
Rating Agencies
Moody's Investors Service
1 Sanssme Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Mark Campa (415) 274-1711
FAX: (415)
Moody's Investors Service
99 Church Street, 9th Floor
New York, NY 10007
Karen Krop (212) 553-4860
FAX: (212) 553-4919 or (964-6038
Standard & Poor's Corporation
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2485
San Francisco, CA 94104
John Costagliola (415) 765-5007
FAX: (415) 433-7839
Standard & Poor's Corporation
25 Broadway, 21st Floor
New York, NY 10004
Phil Edwards (212) 208-1851
FAX: (212) 412-0432
kw
As of 8/26/92
No
$98,500,000
�+
County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3,6,7 & 11 of Orange County, CA
(Capital Improvement Program 1990-92, Series Q
Financing Schedule
April
1992
May 1992
June 1992
S
M
T
W
T
F
S S M T W T F S S
M
T
W T
F
S
1
2
3
4 1 2
1
2
3 4
5
6
�+ 5
6
7
8
9
10
11 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7
8
9
10 11
12
13
12
13
14
15
16
17
18 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14
15
16
17 18
19
20
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21
22
23
24 25
26
27
26
27
28
29
30
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28
29
30
too
Date
Event
Responsibilities
MW
03/09/92
- Initial meeting to discuss financing structure
CSDOC, ML&CO.
03/16/92
- All -hands meeting to discuss legals and determine
All Parties
,o
preliminary structure
03/17/92
- Begin meeting with potential LOC Banks
CSDOC, ML&CO.
tow
04/08/92
- Fiscal Policy Committee packages mailed
CSDOC, ML&CO.
04/13/92
- Rating Agency presentation review
CSDOC, ML&CO.
04/15/92
- Fiscal Policy Committee meeting
CSDOC, ML&CO.
04/16/92
- Review revised Rating Agency presentation
CSDOC, ML&CO.
04/20/92
- Rating Agency presentation dress rehearsal
CSDOC, ML&CO.
04/22/92
- On -site presentation to Moody's
All Parties
04/23/92
- On -site presentation to Standard & Poors
All Parties
04/28/92
- All -hands meeting to review structure
CSDOC, ML&CO.
05/07/92
- Meeting with Nat West to review structuring options
CSDOC, ML&CO.
05/08/92
- Letter of Credit RFP sent out
ML&CO.
- Trustee RFP sent out
05/13/92
- Fiscal Policy Committee packages mailed
CSDOC, ML&CO.
,ow
05/18/92
- Comments back from Rating Agencies
All Parties
05/20/92
- Fiscal Policy Committee Meeting (Informational)
05/25/92
- Variable rate documents distributed
BC
- Draft of variable rate POS distributed
ML, UC
- Commitment Letter Consent Determination
UC, KPMG
05/29/92
- Credit Enhancement & Trustee RFPs received
CSDOC, ML
- Review variable rate documents
All Parties
06/03/92
- Board workshop for historical COP
CSDOC, ML, Board
tw
overview & discussion of derivatives (5:30 P.M.)
06/04/92
- Revised documents distributed
BC, UC
06/10/92
- Board meeting
Board
- Fiscal Policy Committee packages mailed
CSDOC, ML&CO.
und -DEL_._E
NEW ISSUE BOOK -ENTRY ONLY
RATIPIGS: Standard & Poor's Corporation: AAA /A-1+
- Moody's Investors Service: Aaa/VMIG 1
(See "RATINGS" herein)
In the opinion of Ca -Special Counsel. under existing law, the interest Component of Installment Payments received by the Owners of the Cerrifuates
is exempt from personal income taxes of the State of California and, assuming compliance with the tax covenant described herein, is excluded from gross -
income for Federal income tax purposes and is not a specific preference item for purposes of the Federal alternative minimum tax. See. however. "LEGAL
.NATTERS —Tax Matters" herein regarding certain other tax considerations.
o ;
$98,500,000*
CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION
(CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 1990-92 SERIES C)
evidencing direct and proportionate interests
Mal in the right to receive Installment Payments; to be made by
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 19, 29 39 69 7 AND 11 OF
tow
—,
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
-7
3 ; Pursuant to an Agreement for Acquisition and Construction
Dated: Date of Original Delivery Price: 100% Due: August 1, 2017
o This cover page contains certain information for quick reference only. It is not a summary of this issue. Investors must read the entire official
: o statement to obtain information essential to the making of an informed investment decision.
_v a, The Certificates evidence direct and proportionate interests in the right to receive Installment Payments to be made by the Participating Districts
3 j; pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement. Each Participating District is obligated to make its Installment Payments solely from the Net Enterprise
Revenues of such Participating District's sanitary
p g terry sewerage system. Each Participating District is responsible for its own Installment Payments only
and is not obligated for any other Participating District's Installment Payments.
_ " o The Certificates are deliverable in fully registered, book -entry form only and the registered Owner of the Certificates will be Cede & Co., as nominee
c .° for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York ("DTC"), which will act as securities depository for the Certificates. Purchasers, as
H 4E, a Beneficial Owners, will not receive physical certificates representing their interests in the Certificates purchased. Payments with respect to the
t % 73 Certificates are to be made by State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (the "Trustee"), or its agent, to the registered
►— in Owner of the Certificates. So long as the Certificates are subject to the DTC book -entry system, such payments are to be made to DTC or its nominee,
ci c Cede & Co. The disbursement of such payments to DTC Participants is the responsibility of DTC and disbursement of such payments to the Beneficial
u Owners of the Certificates is the responsibility of the DTC Participants and Indirect Participants. See "BOOK -ENTRY SYSTEM" herein.
` E � The Certificates will initially be executed and delivered in the Daily Mode and in denominations of $100,000 or any integral multiple thereof.
/ >,? While in the Daily Mode, the interest rate with respect to the Certificates will be determined by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated,
`m 'a as Remarketing Agent, on each Business Day on the basis of market conditions, as described herein. In the Daily Mode. Intermit Components are
3 E v payable on the fifth Business Day of each calendar month commencing October 7, 1992.
The Certificates are subject to optional and mandatory prepayment prior to maturity and to mandatory purchase as more fully described herein.
n The payment of principal and interest when due with respect to the Certificates will be insured by a municipal bond insurance policy to be issued
yr = by Financial Guaranty Insurance Company simultaneously with the delivery of the Certificates
!! Financial Guarantv Insurance
Ml"Cr Companv at In
U _
C L
.0 a7
sal ;,, Service nark wed by Financial Guaranty Inwranoe Company. ■ private company not
E affiliated with any ti.S. government apeney.
Payment of the Purchase Price equal to the Principal Component and up to 50• days accrued Interest Component at a maximum rate of 12% per
o annum on the Certificates tendered for purchase as described herein and not remarketed will be made pursuant and subject to the terms of the Standby
u = = Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Initial Liquidity Facility") among the Participating Districts and
tow
FGIC SECURITIES PURCHASE, INC.
'; Delivery of this Official Statement in conjunction with the offering of the Certificates may only be made in conjunction with delivery of the prospectus
-0 $ is and the accompanying prospectus supplement relating to the Initial Liquidity Facility. The Initial Liquidity Facility will expire on the fifth anniversary
low y — •� of the delivery of the Certificates unless terminated sooner or extended as set forth herein.
=S A The obligation of each Participating District to make its Installment Payments does not constitute an obligation of such Participating District for
° c c which it is obligated to levy or pledge any form of taxation or for which the Participating District has levied or pledged any form of taxation. The
rv` d obligation of each Participating District to make its Installment Payments does not constitute a debt or indebtedness of such Participating District, the
:4 W '— State of California or any of its political subdivisions within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation or restriction.
01
LD
The Certificates are offered when, as and if delivered and received by the Underwriter, subject to the approval of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander
& Ferdon. Los Angeles, California and Rourke & Woodruff, a professional corporation, Orange, California. Co -Special Counsel, and certain other
conditions. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Underwriter by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, Los Angeles, California and for the
O a Districts by Rourke & Woodruff, a professional corporation, Orange, California. It is anticipated that the Certificates in book -entry form will be
Einavailable for delivery to DTC in New York, New York on or about September 1, 1992.
a Merrill Lynch & Co.
�--5 f Dated: 1992
� -preliminary, subject to change.
bw
Preliminary and Subject to Completion and Amendment, dated August 28, 1992
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
d.+ (To Prospectus dated August 28, 1992)
$989500,000*
ar principal amount plus interest
Liquidity Facility
of
000
FDIC Securities Purchase, Inc.
WW in support of
Certificates of Participation
( Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series C )
evidencing direct and proportionate interests in the
right to receive installment payments; to be made by
ad ;
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 11
of Orange County, California
Dated Date of Certificates: Date of Original Delivery Maturity Date of the Certificates: August 1, 2017
First Optional Tender Date of the Certificates: September , 1992
The Certificates shall initially bear interest at an interest rate to be set daily by the Remarketing Agent
and may be tendered for purchase at the option of the owner thereof under the circumstances described
herein. The Certificates are also subject to optional and mandatory prepayment prior to maturity. Payment
of the purchase price equal to the principal of and up to 50* days' accrued interest at a maximum rate of
12% per annum on the Certificates tendered for purchase as described herein and not remarketed will be
made pursuant and subject to the terms of the Liquidity Facility described herein provided by
FGIC SECURITIES PURCHASE, INC.
"tl The Liquidity Facility will expire five years from the date of delivery of the Certificates unless extended
or sooner terminated in accordance with the terms thereof.
aid THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR
HAS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE
SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR
ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION
TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
The obligations of FGIC Securities Purchase, Inc. under the Liquidity Facility (the "Obligations") are
not being sold separately from the Certificates, which are being offered pursuant to a separate Official
Statement. The Obligations are not severable from the Certificates and may not be separately traded. This
Prospectus Supplement and the accompanying Prospectus, appropriately supplemented, may also be
j delivered in connection with any remarketing of Certificates purchased by FGIC Securities Purchase, Inc. or
i its affiliates or upon a Change in Mode.
Merrill Lynch & Co.
The date of this Prospectus Supplement is , 1992.
*Preliminary, subject to change
TAX-EXEMPT
'NEON ISSUE
Will
Merrill 6ynai
'Aerrlli Lvncn Consumer Markets Merrill Lynch Capitai Markets
M.L. SOLE -MANAGED ATTENTION: National Sales Directors
Regional Directors
Resident Vice Presidents
Resident Managers
Account Executives
MW $98,500,000*
CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION
(CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 1990-92 SERIES C)
�+ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS.1,293 6 7 AND 11 OF
ORANGE COUNW; CALIFORNIA
W i Rating Agencies: Moody's: Aaa/VMIG I S&P. AAA/A-I+
Schedule: Mail: 08/28/92 •
a Price: 08/31/92 •
Selh 09/01/92 •
Deliver. 09/01/92'
411111 Calls: In the Daily Mode, the Certificates are subject to optional
prepayment, in whole, or in part in authorized denominations, on any
Interest Component Payment Date. at a prepayment price equal to 100%
WW plus the accrued and unpaid Interest Component to such prepayment
date, if any.
Maturity Structure
Interest Mode: Initially interest will be calculated in the Daily
Mode but may be converted to alternative modes,
contingent upon the Districts providing notice as
specified in the Official Statement
Due: Maturing August 1. 2017 with mandatory sinking
fund payments beginning August 1, 1993.
Tender Ontion: In Daily Mode owner may tender for par plus
accrued interest on any Busines Day. The
following is a schedule of events:
I1119 Dates: Dated: Delivery Date
By 10:00 am: Remarketing Agent sets new interest rate,
First Coupon: rebruary 1, 1993 effective until the next Business Day.
Due: August
By 10:30 am: Owner gives irrevocable Notice of Tender to
Registration: The Certificates in the Daily Mode are deliverable in Remarketing Agent and Paying Agent.
fully registered form in the denomination of S100,000 or any integral
r.i multiple thereof. Remarketing A¢enr. Merrill Lynch & Co.
Order & Market Information Trustee &
Tax Exempt Money Markets Paving Agent: State Street Bank & Trust Company of
Amy Ball (212) 449-4997 California, NA
aaw
'iubiect to change Short
,1-A,or Office Use Only Term
- h.% memoraMuDl reNteS to a DUDIK olltfTa. Undo' h0 CI ry for Injor Tam • I our oov of tht{ region M.T OQ Shown onot"uotco ALL Aor flC1COUNT
nemDer Of the DUCK. Ihq TefhofalgWft r• ftll'retm a MIt"STAT M mlorTatloha) ISCUS e9 t01 4ECFF I ING pITH P e1.
EXECUTIVES SHOULD READ THE gtELIM=V OFFICIAL STATEMENT BEFORE D15CUSSINGTHEOFFt7tINGWITH POTENTIAL BUYERS
W
PURPOSE: Proceeds from the sate of the Certificates will be used to finance each Participating District's share of the costs of the acquisition and
construction of certain jointly owned sewage treatment and disposal facilities and to reimburse the Participating Districts for the cost of individually
,caned trunk sewer lines.
SECURrlY: The Certificates evidence direct and proportionate interest in the right to receive Installment Payments to be paid by the Participating
Districts under the Acquisition Agreement on a basis subordinate to the payment of its Senior Obligation Service. Pursuant to the Acquisition
.agreement. each Participating District's obligation to make the Installment Payments is a special obligation of such Participating District payable
solely from its Net Enterprise Revenues and does not constitute an obligation for which it is obligated to levy or pledge any form of taxation. The
Certificates will be further secured by the Financial Guaranty Insurance Company (FGIC) guaranteeing the payment of principal and interest with
respect to the Certificates. FGIC has also committed to issue a Standby Bond Purchase Agreement to expire on the fifth anniversary of the delivery
„f the Certificates unless terminated sooner as set forth in the Official Statement.
ISSUER: The Participating Districts are six special districts responsible for sewage transmission. treatment. and disposal for the metropolitan areas
of Orange County. California.
INFORMA110N POINTS:
Financial Guaranty. Certificate Insurance and Standby Bond Purchase Agreement are being provided by Financial Guaranty. a wholly owned
subsidiary of FGIC Corporation. FGIC Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of General Electric Capital Corporation. As of June 30. 199Z the
total capital and surplus of Financial Guaranty was approximately 5597.000.000.
The Pmiect: The Certificates are being issued to finance the cost of acquisition and construction of certain jointly owned sewage treatment and
disposal facilities and certain trunk sewer lines owned by the Participating Districts. Tice acquisition and construction of the Project is expected to
be completed by the end of the Districts' Fiscal Year 1992-91 At this time no difficulties are anticipated in accomplishing the construction itmd
acquisition of the Project, and it is expected that the proceeds of the Certificates, together with any investment proceeds thereof and other available
moneys, will be sufficient for such purpose.
The Proiect's Functions: The Project is part of the Participating Districts' blaster Plan to provide for future quality sanitary sewerage servicm
which arc increasingly environmentally efficient. to the growing number of inhabitants of the Participating Districts.
'Ilia Participating Districts: 'Ilie Districts are co -participants in a Joint Agreement which provides for the joint construction, ownership and
operation of certain treatment and disposal property, plant, equipment and other assets constituting the Joint Facilities. The Participating Districts
currently serve an approximately 310 square -mile area including 20 of the County s 29 cities and a population of approximately 2.025.000.
MANAGERS: MERRILL LYNCH & CO. (SOLE)
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
finance:
Stephen Coma
Melissa Waters
Underwriting
Amy Ball
(213) 6834696
(213) 683-4625
(212) 4494997
Interoffice
No Memorandum
To: See Distribution
At:
From: Melissa Waters
At: PFG-WR
Tel: (213) 683-4625
Merrill Lynch Date: August 27,1992
Subject: Marketing Plan
tzW $98,500,000
Certificates of Participation
Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series C
tmd
County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1,2,3,6,7 and 11 of Orange County, California
SCHEDULE:
ON OR ABOUT:
Mail-
August 28,19920
Price:
August 31,1992*
Sale:
September 1,1992*
Delivery:
September 1,1992*
dr First Interest:
February 1,1993
Expected Ratings: Moody's: Aaa/VMIG I
S&P: AAA/A-I+
Denominations: $100,000 denominations
.d
MANAGERS:
MERRILL LYNCH & CO. (SOLE)
too
PLAN: The following will be assigned as representatives of their departments:
Stephen R. Coma
Public Finance/LA
(213) 683-4696
Melissa A. Waters
Public Fmance/LA
(213) 683-4625
sd
Amy Ball
Underwriting/NY
(212) 449-4997
STEPS
PERSONNEL
DATES
kXW
1. Green Sheet Distributed
Waters
August 27,1992
2. Mailing of P.O.S.
Waters
August 28,1992
3. Posting on IMS/DOS Systems
Ball
As Needed
4. "B" Wire Sent
Ball
As Needed
5. Squawk Box
Ball
As Needed
6. Morning Call
Ball
As Needed
7. Institutional A/E Conference Call
Ball
As Needed
8. Order Final Official Statements
Waters
August 31,1992
9. Pricing
Ball/Coma
August 31,1992
10. Sale
Ball/Coma
September 1,1992
11. Closing
Coma
September 1,1992
DISTRIBUTION: D. Komansky, E. Sheridan, M. Eisenberg, D. Boyle, S. Corliss,
R. Barber, O. Lisec, J. Tresch, J.
Lawlor, S. Narker, F. Young, S. Feldstein,
J. Bonacorda, PFG Executive Committee, PFG Western Region
r
'Subject to change.
wo
•
v
Udd
tw
THE BOND BUYER
New on Calendar
IM111
NEGOTIATED This list includes tentative dates for the largest negotiated bond sales reported
today with the principal co -manager. For details see "Proposed issues."
TAX-EXEMPT
twi $224.445.000
Michigan State Housing Development Authority. First Boston
Corp., as senior manager, expects to negotiate the purchase of
rental housing revenue bonds. 1992 Series A. during the week of
Aug. 31.
S200.000.000
Illinois. PaineWebber Incorporated. as senior manager, expects to
negotiate the purchase of Build Illinois revenue bonds. during the
week of Aug. 31.
$170.085.000
New York State Thruway Authority. Merrill Lynch & Co., as senior
manager, expects to negotiate the purchase of local highway and
bridge service contract bonds. Series 1992, during the week of
Aug. 31.
S 130,000,000
Clark Co., Nev. Smith Barney. Harris Upham & Co., Inc., as senior
manager. expects to negotiate the purchase of industrial
development revenue (Book -Entry) bonds. (Southwest Gas
Corporation). 1992 Series A and 1992 Series B. during the week of -
Aug. 31.
S98.500.000
Orange Co. County Sanitation Districts No. 1. 2.3. 6. 7 and 11.
r+
Calif. Merrill Lvnch & Co.. (alone), expects to negotiate the
purchase of daIN variable rate (FGIC Insured/Book-Entry)
certificates of participation, capital Improvements, on orabout
Sept. 1.
$74.745,805
Indiana Health Facility Financing Authority. First Boston Corp.,
as senior manager. expects to negotiate the purchase of hospital
revenue refunding bonds. Series 1992A. (Methodist Hospital of
Indiana. Inc.). during the week of Aug. 31.
S50,000,000
Heartland Consumer Power Dist.. S.D. Lehman Brothers, as
senior manager, expects to negotiate the purchase of electric
system revenue (Book -Entry) bonds. during the week of Aug. 31.
$41.590.000
Tulare Co.. Calif. A.G. Edwards & Sons. Inc., as senior manager.
expects to negotiate the purchase of certificates of participation.
aid
Series A (MBIA Insured) and Series B. (Book -Entry), during the
week of Aug. 31.
$41.000.000
Orange Co., Fla. First Boston Corp., as senior manager, expects to
negotiate the purchase of capital Improvement and refunding
de
bonds. during the week of Aug. 31.
S32.000.000
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authoritv. State
Street Bank and Trust Co.. Boston, as senior manager, expects to
negotiate the purchase of revenue (Book -Entry) bonds, (Suffolk
University), during the week of Aug. 31.
how S30.000,000
Ashland. Ky. Goldman. Sachs & Co., as senior mana>3er, expects
to negotiate the purchase of pollution control refunding revenue
bonds. Series 1992. (Ashland 011. Inc. Project), during the week of
Aug. 31.
r1w $30.000.000
Richmond Hospital Authority. Ind. PaineWebber Incorporated, as
senior manager, expects to negotiate the purchase of hospital
revenue bonds. during the week of Aug. 31.
$18.000.000
Southwestern Illinois Development Authority. Ziegler Securities a
,9i
division of B.C. Ziegler& Co., (alone), expects to negotiate the
purchase of medical factitties revenue bonds. Anderson Hospital
Project, Series 1992 A. on or about Sept. 2.
S 15.305,000
Kalamazoo. Mich. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.. as senior manager.
expects to negotiate the purchase of wastewater system revenue
refunding bonds, during the week of Aug. 31.
S 13,275,000
Macomb Co. Community College Dist.. Mich. A.G. Edwards &
Sons. Inc.. (alone). expects to negotiate the purchase of unlimited
tax refunding general obligation bonds. during the week of Aug.
r+
31.
S 10.000.000
Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency. Calif. Grigsby
Brandford & Co. Inc.. as senior manager, expects to negotiate the
THE BOND BUYER
Proposed Bond Issues
Compiled by Michelle Midura
CALIFORNIA
Los Angeles Community Redevel-
opment Agency, Calif. —
S10.000.000 Girgsbv Brandford & Co.
Inc., as senior manager, expects to ne-
gotiate the purchase of tax allocation
bonds. A and B. during the week of Aug.
31.
L.O.:Hawkins. Deiafleld & Wood. Los
Angeles.
To Report or Obtain Information:
Proposed Bond Issues
212-943-8546
Bond Calls and
212 943 8546
Redemptions
Sealed Bids Invited
212-943-8544
Competitive Sales
212-943-8600
ReWis
Negotiated Sales
212-943-7897
Results
Bond Ratings
212-943-8545
Short -Term Financing
212-943-8545
Negotiated oMerings
212-943-7898
Orange Co. County Saaitation Dis-
tricts No. 1. 2. 3. 6. 7 and 11. Calif.
(Santa Ana) — $98.500.000 — Mer-
rill Lynch & Co.. (alone), expects to ne-
gotiate the purchase of daily variable
rate (FGIC Insured/Book-Entry) certifi-
cates of participation, capital Improve-
ments. on or about Sept. 1.
L.O.:Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander &
Ferdon. Los Angeles.
Tulare Co.. Calif. (Visalia) —
$41.690.000 — A.G. Edwards & Sons.
Inc.. as senior manager. expects to ne-
gotiate the purchase of certificates of
participation. Series A (MBIA Insuredl
and Series B. (Book -Entry), during the
week of Aug. 31.
FLORIDA
Orange Co.. Fla. (Orlando) —
$41.000,000 — First Boston Corp.. as
senior manager. expects to negotiate
the purchase of capital improvement
and refunding bonds. during the week
of Aug. 31.
ILLINOIS
Illinois (Springfield) —
$200.000.000 — PaineWebber Incor-
porated. as senior manager. expects to
negotiate the purchase of Build Illinois
t
t
[
t
[
t
t
t
t
Ff
t
t
t
t
t
I
t
(,
k [
$98,500,000.00
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3,6,7& 11 of Orange County
(Capital Improvement Program 1990-92, Series C)
FINAL STRUCTURE
STRUCTURE
Interest Rate Bond Type: Variable Rate
Sale Date: September 1, 1992
Transaction Size: $982500,000
Term: 25 years
Lien: Subordinate Lien
Structure: Certificates of Participation
Credit Enhancement: Bond Insurance & 5 Year
Line of Credit Provided By FGIC
Underlying CSDOC Rating: Standard & Poor's: AA—
Moody's: Aa
Series C Rating: Standard & Poor's: AAA
(same as rating of insuror) Moody's: Aaa
Reserve Fund: 10% of Par Amount
}� Capitalized Interest: None
6�S Merrill Lynch
�.'RRILL LYNCH & CO. (."1/92
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$98,500 000 Daily Rate Certificates of Participation
County §anitation Districts Nos. 1,2 3,6,T & 11 of Orange County, CA
(Capital Improvements Program 1990-9�, Series C)
Schedule 1: Sources & Uses
SOURCES OF FUNDS
------------------------------------
Par Amount of Bonds:
Plus Premium / less Discount:
Accrued Interest:
Gross Production:
USES OF FUNDS
Deposit to Construction Fund:
Insurance Premium:
Upfront Insurance Fee:
Reserve Fund:
Costs of Issuance:
Underwriting Spread:
Deposit of Accrued Interest:
Rounding:
KEY DATES & ASSUMPTIONS
------------------------------------
Dated:
Delivery:
First Interest:
First Maturity:
First Construction Draw:
Last Maturity:
Underwriting Spread:
VARIABLE RATE ASSUMPTIONS
Upfront Insurance Fee:
Insurance Premium (1):
Reserve Fund:
Daily Remarketing Fee:
BB Revenue Index (08/27):
Arbitrage TIC:
All -In TIC:
Average Life in Years:
NOTES
------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
$98,500,000.00
0.00
0.00
---------------
$98,500,000.00
---------------
---------------
$87,117,756.26
636,541.71
98,500.00
91850000.00
250:000.00
541,750.00
0.00
5,452.03
$98,500,000.00
--------------
--------------
09/01/92
09/01/92
02/01/93
08/01/93
09/01/92
08/01/17
$5.50
0.100%
0.300%
10.000%
0.125%
6.450%
6.639%
6.727%
16.60
- Debt Service Amortized at 7.50%
(1) Premium Based on Debt Service Assuming BB Revenue Bond Index & 50 SP
[ [
[
[
l
[
[
t
t t
t
[
[
t
t [
[
f
MERR( -YNCH
& CO.
08/31/92
==____-----------
$98,500,000 Daily
Rate
Certificates of Participation
County Sanitation
Districts
Nos.
1,2,3,6,7 &
11 of Orange
County, CA
(Capital Improvements
Program
1990-92, Series
C)
Schedule 2:
Proposed Debt
Service
ALL DISTRICT
100.000%
Annual
Date
Rate
Yield
Principal
Interest
Total
FY Total
FY
1
----------
02/01/93
--------
--------
----------
-----------
2,667,708
-----------
2,667,708
-----------
2,667,708
-------
92 - 93
2
08/01/93
6.500%
6.500%
1,400,000
3,201,250
4,601,250
3
02/01/94
3,155,750
3,155,750
7,757,000
93 - 94
4
08/01/94
6.500%
6.500%
1,500,000
3,155,750
4,655,750
5
02/01/95
3,107,000
3,107,000
7,762,750
94 - 95
6
08/01/95
6.500%
6.500%
1,600,000
3,107,000
4,707,000
7
02/01/96
3,055,000
3,055,000
7,762,000
95 - 96
8
08/01/96
6.500%
6.500%
1,700,000
3,055,000
4,755,000
9
02/01/97
2,999,750
2,999,750
7,754,750
96 - 97
10
08/01/97
6.500%
6.500%
1,900,000
2,999,750
4,899,750
11
02/01/98
2,938,000
2,938,000
7,837,750
97 - 98
12
08/01/98
6.500%
6.500%
2,000,000
2,938,000
4,938,000
13
02/01/99
2,873,000
2,873,000
7,811,000
98 - 99
14
08/01/99
6.500%
6.500%
2,200,000
2,873,000
5,073,000
15
02/01/2000
2,801,500
2,801,500
7,874,500
99 - 00
16
08/01/2000
6.500%
6.500%
2,400,000
2,801,500
5,201,500
17
02/01/2001
2,723,500
2,723,500
7,925,000
00 - 01
18
08/01/2001
6.500%
6.500%
2,500,000
2,723,500
5,223,500
19
02/01/2002
2,642,250
2,642,250
7,865,750
01 - 02
20
08/01/2002
6.500%
6.500%
2,700,000
2,642,250
5,342,250
21
02/01/2003
2,554,500
2,554,500
7,896,750
02 - 03
22
08/01/2003
6.500%
6.500%
2,900,000
2,554,500
5,454,500
23
02/01/2004
2,460,250
2,460,250
7,914,750
03 - 04
24
08/01/2004
6.500%
6.500%
3,200,000
2,460,250
5,660,250
25
02/01/2005
2,356,250
2,356,250
8,016,500
04 - 05
26
08/01/2005
6.500%
6.500%
3,400,000
2,356,250
5,756,250
27
02/01/2006
2,245,750
2,245,750
8,002,000
05 - 06
28
08/01/2006
6.500%
6.500%
3,700,000
2,245,750
5,945,750
29
02/01/2007
2,125,500
2,125,500
8,071,250
06 - 07
30
08/O1/2007
6.500%
6.500%
4,000,000
2,125,500
6,125,500
31
02/01/2008
1,995,500
1,995,500
8,121,000
07 - 08
32
08/01/2008
6.500%
6.500%
4,300,000
1,995,500
6,295,500
33
02/01/2009
1,855,750
1,855,750
8,151,250
08 - 09
34
08/01/2009
6.500%
6.500%
4,600,000
1,855,750
6,455,750
35
02/01/2010
1,706,250
1,706,250
8,162,000
09 - 10
36
08/01/2010
6.500%
6.500%
5,000,000
1,706,250
6,706,250
37
02/01/2011
1,543,750
1,543,750
8,250,000
10 - 11
38
08/01/2011
6.500%
6.500%
5,400,000
1,543,750
6,943,750
39
02/01/2012
1,368,250
1,368,250
8,312,000
11 - 12
40
08/01/2012
6.500%
6.500%
5,800,000
1,368,250
7,168,250
41
02/01/2013
1,179,750
1,179,750
8,348,000
12 - 13
42
08/01/2013
6.500%
6.500%
6,200,000
1,179,750
7,379,750
43
02/O1/2014
978,250
978,250
8,358,000
13 - 14
44
08/01/2014
6.500%
6.500%
6,700,000
978,250
7,678,250
45
02/01/2015
760,500
760,500
8,438,750
14 - 15
46
OB/01/2015
6.500%
6.500%
7,200,000
760,500
7,960,500
47
02/01/2016
526,500
526,500
8,487,000
15 - 16
48
08/01/2016
6.500%
6.500%
7,800,000
526,500
8,326,500
49
02/01/2017
273,000
273,000
8,599,500
16 - 17
50
08/01/2017
6.500%
6.500%
8,400,000
273,000
8,673,000
----------
-----------
-----------
8,673,000
-----------
17 - 18
$98,500,000 $106,319,958
$204,819,958
$204,819,958
I t
[
t
[
t
t [
t
I I
I
I
[
[
[ I
MERR( -YNCH
----------------------------------------------------------------------
& CO.
08/31/92
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
$9,999,000 Daily Rate Certificates
of Participation
County Sanitation Districts
(Capital Improvements Program
Nos. 1,2
1990-9f,
3,6,7 &
Series
11 of Orange
C)
County, CA
Schedule 2:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Debt Service
DISTRICT tl1:
10.152%
Date
Rate
Yield
Principal
Interest
Total
1
----------
02/01/93
-------- --------
----------
-----------
270,833
-----------
270,833
2
08/01/93
6.500%
6.500%
142,132
325000
467,132
3
02/01/94
320:381
320,381
4
08/01/94
6.500%
6.500%
152,284
320,381
472,665
5
02/01/95
315,431
315,431
6
08/01/95
6.500%
6.500%
162,437
315,431
477,868
7
02/01/96
310,152
310,152
8
08/01/96
6.500%
6.500%
172,589
310,152
482,741
9
02/01/97
304,543
304,543
10
08/01/97
6.500%
6.500%
192,893
304,543
497,437
11
02/01/98
298,274
298,274
12
08/01/98
6.500%
6.500%
203,046
298,274
501,320
13
02/01/99
291,675
291,675
14
0 /01/99
6.500%
6.500%
223,350
291,675
515,025
15
02/01/2000
284,416
284,416
16
08/01/2000
6.500%
6.500%
243,655
284,416
528,071
17
02/01/2001
276,497
276,497
18
08/01/2001
6.500%
6.500%
253,807
276,497
530,305
19
02/01/2002
268,249
268,249
20
OB/01/2002
6.500%
6.500%
274,112
268,249
542,360
21
02/01/2003
259,340
259,340
22
08/01/2003
6.500%
6.500%
294,416
259,340
553,756
23
02/01/2004
249,772
249,772
24
08/01/2004
6.500%
6.500%
324,873
249,772
574,645
25
02/01/2005
239,213
239,213
26
OB/01/2005
6.500%
6.500%
345,178
239,213
584,391
27
02/01/2006
227,995
227,995
28
08/01/2006
6.500%
6.500%
375,635
227,995
603,629
29
02/01/2007
215,787
215,787
30
08/01/2007
6.500%
6.500%
406,091
215,787
621,878
31
02/01/2008
202,589
202,589
32
08/01/2008
6.500%
6.500%
436,548
202,589
639,137
33
02/01/2009
188,401
188,401
34
08/01/2009
6.500%
6.500%
467,005
188,401
655,406
35
02/01/2010
173,223
173,223
36
OB/01/2010
6.500%
6.500%
507,614
173,223
680,838
37
02/01/2011
156,726
156,726
38
08/01/2011
6.500%
6.500%
548,223
156,726
704,949
39
08/01/2012
138,909
138,909
40
0/01/2012
6.500%
6.500%
588,832
138,909
727,741
41
02/01/2013
119,772
119,772
42
08/01/2013
6.500%
6.500%
629,442
119,772
749,213
43
02/01/2014
99,315
99,315
44
08/01/2014
6.500%
6.500%
680,203
99,315
779,518
45
02/01/2015
77,208
77,208
46
08/01/2015
6.500%
6.500%
730,964
77,208
808,173
47
02/01/2016
53,452
53,452
48
08/01/2016
6.500%
6.500%
791,878
53,452
845,330
49
02/01/2017
27,716
27,716
50
08/01/2017
6.500%
6.500%
852,792
27,716
880,508
$10,000,000 $10,793,904 $20,793,904
Annual
FY Total
...........
787,513
788,096
788,020
787,284
795,711
792,995
799,442
804,569
798,553
801,701
803,528
813,858
812,386
819,416
824,467
827,538
828,629
837,563
843,858
847,513
848,528
856,726
861,624
873,046
880,508
$20,793,904
I
FY
92 - 93
93 - 94
94 - 95
95 - 96
96 - 97
97 - 98
98 - 99
99 - 00
00 - 01
01 - 02
02 - 03
03 - 04
04 - 05
05 - 06
06 - 07
07 - 08
08 - 09
09 - 10
10 - 11
11-12
12 - 13
13 - 14
14 - 15
15 - 16
16 - 17
17 - 18
I I
[
[
[
I
SUMMARY
Par Amount:
$10,000,000.00
Construction Fund:
$8,844,442.29
Reserve Fund:
$1,000,000.00
Costs of Issuance:
$25,380.71
underwriting Spread:
S55,000.00
Insurance Premium:
$64,623.52
Upfront Insurance Fee:
$10 000.00
Rounding:
653.47
Total OS:-..------------- $20=793,904 37
i [ [ [ i [ [ [ [ 0
MEk SYNCH & CO. 08/31/92 _
----------------------------------------------------------------------
$27,500 000 Daily Rate Certificates of Participation
County sanitation Districts Nos. 12 3,6,7 & 11 of Orange County, CA
(Capital Improvements Program 19W O, Series C)
Schedule 2: Proposed Debt Service
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISTRICT #2: 27.919%
Annual
Date Rate Yield Principal Interest Total FY Total
---------- -------- -------- ---------- ---------------------- -----------
6.500%
6.500%
390,863
6.500%
6.500%
418,782
6.500%
6.500%
446,701
6.500%
6.500%
474,619
6.500%
6.500%
530,457
6.500%
6.500%
558,376
6.500%
6.500%
614,213
6.500%
6.500%
670,051
6.500%
6.500%
697,970
6.500%
6.500%
753,807
6.500%
6.500%
809,645
6.500%
6.500%
893,401
6.500%
6.500%
949,239
6.500%
6.500%
1,032,995
6.500%
6.500%
1,116,751
6.500%
6.500%
1,200,508
6.500%
6.500%
1,284,264
6.500%
6.500%
1,395,939
6.500%
6.500%
1,507,614
6.500%
6.500%
1,619,289
6.500%
6.500%
1,730,964
6.500%
6.500%
1,870,558
6.500%
6.500%
2,010,152
6.500%
6.500%
2,177,665
6.500%
6.500%
2,345,178
744,792
744,792
744,792
893,750
1,284,613
881,047
881,047
2,165,660
881,047
1,299,829
867,437
867,437
2,167,265
867,437
1,314,137
852,919
852,919
2,167,056
852,919
1,327,538
837,494
837,494
2,165,032
837,494
1,367,951
820,254
820,254
2,188,204
820,254
1,378,629
802,107
802,107
2,180,736
802,107
1,416,320
782,145
782,145
2,198,464
782,145
1,452,195
760,368
760,368
2,212,563
760,368
1,458,338
737,684
737,684
2,196,022
737,684
1,491,491
713,185
713,185
2,204,676
713,185
1,522,830
686,872
686,872
2,209,702
686,872
1,580,273
657,836
657,836
2,238,109
657,836
1,607,075
626,986
626,986
2,234,061
626,986
1,659,981
593,414
593,414
2,253,395
593,414
1,710,165
557,119
557,119
20267,284
557,119
1,757627
518,103
518:103
2,275,730
518,103
1,802,367
476,364
476,364
2,278,731
476,364
1,872,303
430,996
430,996
2,303,299
430,996
1,938,610
381,999
381,999
2,320,609
381,999
2,001,288
329,372
329,372
2,330,660
329,372
2,060,336
273,115
273,115
2,333,452
273,115
2,143,674
212,322
212,322
2,355#996
212,322
2,222475
146:992
146:992
2,369,467
146,992
2,324,657
76,218
76,218
2,400,876
76,218
2,421,396
2,421,396
327,500,000 $29,683,237 $57,183,237 $57,183,237
FY
SUMMARY
92 -
93
93 -
94
Par Amount:
$27,500,000.00
94 -
95
Construction Fund:
$24,322,216.19
Reserve Fund:
$2,750000.00
95 -
96
Costs of Issuance:
$69:796.95
Underwriting Spread:
$151,250.00
96 -
97
Insurance Premium:
$177,714.69
Upfront Insurance Fee:
$27,500.00
97 -
98
Rounding:
E1,522.17
98 -
99
Total DS:
$57,183,237.12
99 -
00
00 -
01
01 -
02
02 -
03
03 -
04
04 -
05
05 -
06
06
07
07 -
08
08 -
09
09 -
10
10 -
11
11 -
12
12 -
13
13 -
14
14 -
15
15 -
16
16 -
17
17 -
18
[ t t [ t [ t [ t 6
MERR , LYNCH & CO. 08/31/92
=== -----------------
$33,499 000 Daily Rate Certificates of Participation
County §anitation Districts Nos. 1,2 3,6,7 & 11 of Orange County, CA
(Capital Improvements Program 140'-0, Series C)
Schedule 2: Proposed Debt Service
--------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISTRICT #3: 34.010%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
15
16
18
21
22
24
26
Date Rate
------------------ --------
Yield
Principal
----------
02/01/93
ON 1/93 6.500%
6.500%
476,142
02/01/94
08/01/94 6.500%
6.500%
510,152
02/01/95
08/01/95 6.500%
6.500%
544,162
02/01/96
08/01/96 6.500%
02/01/97
6.500%
578,173
08/01/97 6.500%
02/01/98
6.500%
646,193
08/01/98 6.500%
6.500%
680,203
02/01/99
08/01/99 6.500%
6.500%
748,223
02/01/2000
08/01/2000
6.500%
6.500%
816,244
02/01/2001
08/01/2001
6.500%
6.500%
850,254
02/01/2002
08/01/2002
6.500%
6.500%
918,274
02/01/2003
08/01/2003
6.500%
6.500%
986,294
02/01/2004
08/01/2004
6.500%
6.500%
1,088,325
02/01/2005
08/01/2005
6.500%
6.500%
1,156,345
02/01/2006
08/01/2006
6.500%
6.500%
1,258,376
02/01/2007
08/01/2007
6.500%
6.500%
1,360,406
02/01/2008
08/0
/2008 6.500%
6.500%
1,462,437
02/O1/2009
08/01/2009
6.500%
6.500%
1,564,467
02/01/2010
08/01/2010
6.500%
6.500%
1,700,508
02/01/2011
08/01/2011
6.500%
6.500%
1,836,548
02/01/2012
08/01/2012
6.500%
6.500%
1,972,589
02/01/2013
08/01/2013
02/01/2014
6.500%
6.500%
2,108,629
08/01/2014
6.500%
6.500%
2,278,680
02/01/2015
08/01/2015
6.500%
6.500%
2,448,731
02/01/2016
08/01/2016
02/01/2017
6.500%
6.500%
2,652,792
08/01/2017
6.500%
6.500%
2,856,853
Interest
907,292
1088,750
1:073,275
1,073,275
1,056,695
1,056,695
1,039,010
1,039,010
1,020,220
1,020,220
999,218
999,218
977,112
977,112
952,794
952,794
926,266
926,266
898,633
898,633
868,789
868,789
836,735
836,735
801,364
801,364
763,783
722,8886
722;886
678,673
678,673
631,143
631,143
580,298
580,298
525,032
525,032
465,344
465,344
401,235
401,235
332,704
332,704
258647
258:647
179063
179:063
92,848
92,848
---------------------
$33,500,000 $36,159,580
Annual
Total FY Total
-----------
907,292 907,292
1,564,892
1,073,275 2,638,168
1,583,428
1,056,695 2,640,123
1,600,858
1,039,010 2,639,868
1,617,183
1,020,220 2,637,402
1,666,412
999,218 2,665,631
1,679,421
977,112 2,656,533
1,725,335
952,794 2,678,129
1,769,038
926,266 2,695,305
1,776,520
898,633 2,675,154
1,816,907
868,789 2,685,697
1,855,084
836,735 2,691,819
1,925,060
801,364 2,726,424
1,957,709
763,783 2,721,492
2,022,159
722,886 2,745,044
2,083,292
678,673 2,761,964
2,141,109
631,143 2,772,253
2,195,610
580,298 2,775,909
2,280,806
525,032 2,805,838
2,361,580
465,344 2,826,924
2,437,933
401,235 2,839,168
2,509,864
332,704 2,842,569
2,611,385
258,647 2,870,032
2,707,378
179,063 2,886,442
2,831,855
92,848 2,924,703
2,949,700 2,949,700
----------- -----------
$69,659,580 $69,659,580
FY
92-93
93 - 94
94 - 95
95 - 96
96-97
97 - 98
98 - 99
99 - 00
00 - 01
01 - 02
02 - 03
03 - 04
04 - 05
05 - 06
06 - 07
07 - 08
08 - 09
09 - 10
10 - 11
11 - 12
12 - 13
13 - 14
14 - 15
15 - 16
16 - 17
17 - 18
i i
I
I
t
I
(
SUMMARY
Par Amount:
$33,500,000.00
Construction Fund:
$29,628,881.59
Reserve Fund:
$3,350000.00
Costs of Issuance:
$85:025.38
Underwriting Spread:
$184250.00
Insurance Premium:
$216:488.81
Upfront Insurance Fee:
$33,500.00
Rounding:
$1,854.22
Total-DS$69,659,579.72
[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [
MERR(- SYNCH & CO. 08/31/92
=C ------------------
$6,999,000 Daily Rate Certificates of Participation
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 12 3,6,7 & 11 of Orange County, CA
(Capital Improvements Program 199010 , Series C)
Schedule 2: Proposed Debt Service
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISTRICT #6: 7.107%
Date Rate Yield Principal Interest Total
---------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------- -----------
189,583
6.500%
6.500%
99,492
227,500
224,266
6.500%
6.500%
106,599
224,266
220,802
6.500%
6.50D%
113,706
220,802
217,107
6.500%
6.500%
120,812
217,107
213,180
6.500%
6.500%
135,025
213,180
208,792
6.500%
6.500%
142,132
208,792
204,173
6.500%
6.500%
156,345
204,173
199,091
6.500%
6.500%
170,558
199091
193:548
6.500%
6.500%
177,665
193,548
187,774
6.500%
6.500%
191,878
187,774
181,538
6.500%
6.500%
206,091
181,538
174,840
6.500%
6.500%
227,411
174,840
167,449
6.500%
6.500%
241,624
167,449
159,596
6.500%
6.500%
262,944
159,596
151,051
6.500%
6.500%
294,264
151,051
141,812
6.500%
6.500%
305,584
141,812
131,881
6.500%
6.500%
326,904
131,881
121,256
6.500%
6.500%
355,330
121,256
109,708
6.500%
6.500%
383,756
109,708
97,236
6.500%
6.500%
412,183
97,236
83,840
6.500%
6.500%
440,609
83,840
69,520
6.500%
6.500%
476,142
69,520
54,046
6.500%
6.500%
511,675
54,046
37,416
6.500%
6.500%
554,315
37,416
19,401
6.500%
6.500%
596,954
19,401
189,583
326,992
224,266
330,865
220,802
334,508
217,107
337,919
213,180
348,206
208,792
350,924
204,173
360,518
199,091
435,315
141,812
447,396
131,881
458,784
121,256
476,586
109,708
493,464
97,236
509,419
83,840
524,449
69,520
545,662
54,046
565,721
37,416
591,731
19,401
616,355
$7,000,000 $7,555,733 $14,555,733
Annual
FY Total
----189,583
551,259
551,668
551,614
551,099
556,997
555,096
559,609
563,198
558,987
561,190
562,470
569,701
568,670
573,591
577,127
579,277
580,041
586,294
590,701
593259
593:970
599,708
603,137
611,132
616,355
$14,555,733
FY
92 - 93
93 - 94
94-95
95 - 96
96-97
97 - 98
98 - 99
99 - 00
00 - 01
01 - 02
02 - 03
03 - 04
04 - 05
05 - 06
06 - 07
07 - 08
08 - 09
09 - 10
10 - 11
11-12
12 - 13
13 - 14
14 - 15
15 - 16
16 - 17
17 - 18
I I
I
I
I
t
(
SUMMARY
Par Amount:
$7,000,000.00
Construction Fund:
Reserve Fund:
$6 191109.60
1700:000.00
Costs of Issuance:
$17,766.50
Underwriting Spread:
$38,500.00
Insurance Premium:
$45,236.47
Upfront Insurance Fee:
$7 000.00
Rounding:
1387.43
Total DS:---V------------$14=555,733y06
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
11
12
[ [ [ t [ [ [ (R
MERL LYNCH & CO. 08/31/92 \
-------- -------------------------------------------------------------------
$7,500,000 Daily Rate Certificates of Participation
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2 3,6,7 & 11 of Orange County, CA
(Capital Improvements Program 1990-9f, Series C)
Schedule 2: Proposed Debt Service
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISTRICT #7: 7.614%
Annual
Date Rate Yield Principal Interest Total FY Total
-------------------------- ---------- ---------------------- -----------
203,125
6.500%
6.500%
106,599
243,750
240,286
6.500%
6.500%
114,213
240,286
236,574
6.500%
6.500%
121,827
236,574
232,614
6.500%
6.500%
129,442
232,614
228,407
6.500%
6.500%
144,670
228,407
223,706
6.500%
6.500%
152,284
223,706
218,756
6.500%
6.500%
167,513
218,756
213,312
6.500%
6.500%
182,741
213,312
207,373
6.500%
6.500%
190,355
207,373
201,187
6.500%
6.500%
205,584
201,187
194,505
6.500%
6.500%
220,812
194,505
187,329
6.500%
6.500%
243,655
187,329
179,410
6.500%
6.500%
258,883
179,410
170,996
6.500%
6.500%
281,726
170,996
161,940
6.500%
6.500%
304,569
161,840
151,942
6.500%
6.500%
327,411
151,942
141,301
6.500%
6.500%
350,254
141,301
129,918
6.500%
6.500%
380,711
129,918
117,544
6.500%
6.500%
411,168
117,544
104,181
6.500%
6.500%
441,624
104,181
89,829
6.500%
6.500%
472,081
89,829
74,486
6.500%
6.500%
510,152
74,486
57,906
6.500%
6.500%
548,223
57,906
40,089
6.500%
6.500%
593,909
40,089
20,787
6.500%
6.500%
639,594
20,787
203,125
203,125
350,349
240,286
590,635
354,499
236,574
591,072
358,401
232,614
591,015
362,056
228,407
590,463
373,077
223,706
596,783
375,990
218,756
594,746
386,269
213,312
599,581
396,053
207,373
603,426
397,728
201,187
598,915
406,770
194,505
601,275
415,317
187,329
602,646
430,984
179,410
610,393
438,293
170,996
609,289
452,722
161,840
614,562
466,409
151,942
618,350
479,353
141,301
620,654
491,555
129,918
621,472
510,628
117,544
628,173
528,712
104,181
632,893
545,806
89,829
635,635
561,910
74,486
636,396
584,638
57,906
642,544
606,129
40,089
646,218
633,997
20,787
654,784
660,381
660,381
$7,500,000 $8,095,428 $15,595,428 $15,595,428
[
FY
92 - 93
93 - 94
94 - 95
95 - 96
96 - 97
97 - 98
98 - 99
99 - 00
QO - 01
01 - 02
02 - 03
03 - 04
04 - 05
05 - 06
06 - 07
07 - 08
08 - 09
09 - 10
10 - 11
11 - 12
12 - 13
13 - 14
14 - 15
15 - 16
16 - 17
17 - 18
[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [
SUMMARY
Par Amount:
$7,500,000.00
Construction Fund:
Reserve Fund:
$6 633,331.70
050,000.00
Costs of Issuance:
$19,035.53
Underwriting Spread:
S41,250.00
insurance Premium:
$48,467.64
Upfront Insurance Fee:
$7 500.00
Rounding:
W 5.13
Total DS: $15,595,428.30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
48
50
[ ( t [ [ t [ a
MERR(_ SYNCH & CO. 08/31/92
----------------------------------------------------------------------
$13,000 000 Daily Rate Certificates of Participation
County sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2 3,6,7 & 11 of Orange County, CA
(Capital Improvements Program 1990-9`G, Series C)
Schedule 2: Proposed Debt Service
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISTRICT #11 13.198%
Annual
Date Rate Yield Principal Interest Total FY Total
---------- -------------------------- ----------- ----------------------
6.500%
6.500%
184,772
6.500%
6.500%
197,970
6.500%
6.500%
211,168
6.500%
6.500%
224,365
6.500%
6.500%
250,761
6.500%
6.500%
263,959
6.500%
6.500%
290,355
6.500%
6.500%
316,751
6.500%
6.500%
329,949
6.500%
6.500%
356,345
6.500%
6.500%
382,741
6.500%
6.500%
422,335
6.500%
6.500%
448,731
6.500%
6.500%
488,325
6.500%
6.500%
527,919
6.500%
6.500%
567,513
6.500%
6.500%
607,107
6.500%
6.500%
659,898
6.500%
6.500%
712,690
6.500%
6.500%
765,482
6.500%
6.500%
818,274
6.500%
6.500%
884,264
6.500%
6.500%
950,254
6.500%
6.500%
1,029,442
6.500%
6.500%
1,108,629
352,083
352,083
352,083
422,500
607,272
416,495
416,495
1,023,766
416,495
614,464
410,061
410,061
1,024,525
410,061
621,228
403,198
403,198
1,024,426
403,198
627,563
395,906
395,906
1,023,470
395,906
646,668
387,756
387,756
1,034,424
387,756
651,716
379,178
379,178
1,030,893
379,178
669,533
369,741
369,741
1,039,274
369,741
686,492
359,447
359,447
1,D45,939
359,447
689,396
348,723
348,723
1,038,119
348,723
705,069
337,142
337,142
1,042,211
337,142
719,883
324,703
324,703
1,044,586
324,703
747,038
310,977
310,977
1,058,015
310,977
759,708
296,393
296,393
1,056,102
296,393
784,718
280,523
280,523
1,065,241
280,523
808,442
263,365
263,365
1,071,807
263,365
830,878
244,921
244,921
1,075,799
244,921
852,028
225,190
225,190
1,077,218
225,190
885,089
203,744
203,744
1,088,832
203,744
916,434
180,581
180,581
1,097,015
180,581
946,063
155,703
155,703
1,101,766
155,703
973,977
129,109
129,109
1,103,086
129,109
1,013,373
100,371
100,371
1,113,744
100,371
1,050,624
69,487
69,487
1,120,112
69,487
1,098,929
36,030
36,030
1,134,959
36,030
1,144,660
1,144,660
$13,000,000 $14,032,076 $27,032,076 $27,032,076
FY
92 - 93
93 - 94
94 - 95
95 - 96
96 - 97
97 - 98
98 - 99
99 - 00
00 - 01
01 - 02
02-03
03 - 04
04-05
05 - 06
06 - 07
07 - 08
08 - 09
09 - 10
10 - 11
11 - 12
12 - 13
13 - 14
14 - 15
15 - 16
16 - 17
17 - 18
t I
I
t
t
I
(
SUMMARY
Par Amount:
$13,000,000.00
Construction Fund:
$11,497,774.90
Reserve Fund:
$1,300,000.00
Costs of Issuance:
$32,994.92
Underwriting Spread:
$71,500.00
Insurance Premium:
$84,010.58
Upfront Insurance Fee:
$13 000.00
Rounding:
019.60
Total DS: $27,032,075.74
a
t
t .
t
t
t
t
t
t
I
I
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
(
(
(
9
8
0\
6
U
L.
N
5
�a
b
cu
ti
4
a.
x
w
3
rn
au
.j
2
1
0
12/90 02/91
Weekly Interest Rate Averages
r.Rnnr. SPr1PS A PrnorAm
04/91 07/91 09/91 11/91 01/92 04/92 06/92 08/92
Merrill hynch
F
i.
wo
We
mr
.r
M
THE BOND BUYER
FRIDAY, JULY 17
.4naivsts Federation Head
Says Issuers' List Doubles
For Market Disclosure
By Vickv Stamas
WASHINGTON — The National
Federation of Municipal Analvsts
has neariv doubled its list of bond
:ssuers that have pledged to meet
he federation's rigorous standards
:or secondary market disclosure.
Chairwoman Victoria Westall an-
nounced yesterday.
Some analvsts have voiced frus-
,ration that the groups call for im-
proved disclosure has not met more
of a response. But a major bond in-
surer has indicated that it consid-
ers improved disclosure a top factor
when deciding prices.
Ms. Westall. director of munici-
pal research for Edward D. Jones &
Co. In St. Louis. said the following
12 issuers were added to the federa-
tion's list: the cities of Chicago. Fort
North. Tex.. and Grass Vallev.
Calif.: the Village of Buffalo Grove.
Ill.: CGH Medical Center of Sterling.
:"ease turn 10 A ALYSTS Pare 0
Pages 345.368
Analysts
Continued from front page
Ill.: the Florida Municipal Power
Agency: the Greater Orlando. Fla.,
Aviation Authority: the intermoun-
tain Power Agency in Utah: the
North Carolina Eastern Municipal
Power Agency: the North Carolina
Municipal Power Agency No. One:
the Piedmont Municipal Power
Agencv in South Carolina: and the
Prince William Countv Park Au-
thority In Virginia.
The additions bring to 22 the to-
tal number of cities, counties. and
other entities that have adopted
resolutions or provided written
statements from authorized offi-
cials pledging to provide regular au-
dited financial statements. com-
prehensive financial reports if
prepared. and other key credit in-
formation about their outstanding
bonds.
Issuers also must pledge to send
periodic credit information to a rat-
ing agency for rated deals. And they
must state in the introduction to of-
ficial statements that they have
made these commitments.
The announcement comes amid
growing frustration among ana-
lvsts about what thev view -as the
sluggish response by issuers to
calls for improved secondary mar-
ket disclosure. Federation officials
said last week they are putting the
final touches on a broad survev
that will go to the groups 80b
members this summer to gauge tm-
provements in the area.
To date. no buvers have reported
paying a premium for bonds strictly
because of the quality of secondary
market disclosure. nor have anv in-
surers reported giving a discount
exclusively for that reason. Market
observers sav such statements are
unlikely because of the many fac-
tors that go into price determi-
nations.
But the Financial Guarantv In-
surance Co. last week clearly indi-
cated it is rewarding issuers that
provide ongoing disclosure by re-
ducing the cost of providing credit
enhancements.
Pricing "was based on outstand-
ing operating performance. strong
legal covenants and detailed ongo-
ing disclosure." John Cassidy. vice
president of Financial Guarantv's
utility group. said in a statement
announcing that the company had
been selected to back an upcoming
S 100 million issue of variable -rate
certificates of participation by the
Countv Sanitation Districts of Ot:-
ange County. Calif. Financial Guar-
anty said credit enhancement for
the issue resulted in an interest -
rate savings of roughly S2.5 million
over the life of the bond issue.
Meanwhile. the upcoming survey
by the analvsts federation drew an
angry response from at least one
municipal official. who said that
some issuers have already been
providing excellent secondary mar-
ket disclosure and that improve-
ments by the rest will happen only
when they have a price incentive.
"Issuers have been painted as
the bad guys for not being respon-
sive." said John Gunvou. commis-
sioner of the Minnesota Depart-
ment of Finance and chairman of
the Government Finance Officers
Association's committee on gov-
ernmental debt and fiscal policy.
"Why should an issuer respond if
the market will always pay him. re-
gardless?" Mr. Gunvou continued.
"There's no financial incentive.
Until investors stop buying paper
or attach a penalty to that. people
are not going to be responsive.
GFOA is encouraging people to do
It. Now the other side of the market
has to start responding."
Mr. Gunvou was critical of a re-
cent federation recommendation
that issuers declare in official state-
ments whether thev will or will not
supply ongoing disclosure. "NFMA
is hung up on the negative." he
said. "Some of us have been doing
an excellent job of disclosing for
years. But there is no 1pricej differ-
entiation."
Richard Ciccaronc. chairman of
the federation's standards and
practices committee. responded to
Mr. Gunyou's charges in a tele-
phone interview yesterday. "We're
in this together." he said.
Talking to the association's
members is "like singing to the
choir." he added. noting that many
association members had already
been providing ongoing secondary
market disclosure. p
THE BOND BUYER
MONDAY, AUGUST 24
California to Work Away at Budget Gap
Following First Big Break in Stalemate
By Debora Vrana
LOS ANGELES — California
lawmakers were expected to work
throueh the weekend on ways to
bridge the slate's S 11 billion budget
gap, after reaching a major break-
through on local government policy
last week.
On Thursday. the Assembly
passed and sent to the governor a
two-b1U package allowing counties
to cut certain health and welfare
services.
The measure could ease passage
of a budget. allowing the state to
take $1.3 billion in property tax
revenues from local governments.
The governor has said he will sign
the bills.
"This train Is moving. It's picking
up speed." Cynthia Katz. spokes-
woman for the state Department of
Finance. said Friday. "Unless some
monkey wrench gets thrown in
along the way. we're moving
forward."
Ms. Katz said a budget plan may
be passed over the weekend or this
week.
Last week's compromise on local
government was one of the first
major breakthroughs since state
leaders failed to reach a budget ac-
cord by July 1. the start of the fiscal
year. The budget Impasse is the
longest in California history.
The action on local government
would give counties the ability to
cut general assistance welfare
grants. Impose a 15-day residency
requirement for welfare recipients.
stop aid to recipients who fail to
participate in job programs. and re-
duce grants to those who share
housing.
On the health front. the bills
would allow counties to shut down
a medical clinic with a 14-day no-
tice. The current requirement is 30
days. They would also eliminate a
provision requiring counties to hold
a hearing to determine any nega-
tive Impact of such a closure.
" 1t allows counties to do almost
as they please as far as health and
welfare noes." said Jim Lewis.
press secretary for Assembly
Speaker Willie Broom. D-San Fran-
cisco.
The new flexibility for counties
may garner enough bipartisan leg-
Istative support for a measure to
shift S 1.3 billion in aid from cities.
counties. and special districts to
the state.
Mr. Lewis said the Assembly was
expected to debate more than 24
budget -related bills on Friday and
Saturday. after rejecting Gov. Pete
Wilson's new budget proposal on
Wednesday.
While lawmakers have reached a
tentative agreement on local gov-
ernment. correctional facilities.
and higher education. they were ex-
pected this weekend to discuss sev-
eral controversial issues.
These include cuts to community
college funding and the amount of
funding schools will be guaranteed
under Proposition 98. which re-
quires that 40% of the state budget
goes to schools.
Various budget proposals are
pending. but Gov. Wilson s new
plan would cut school funds by
S 1.49 billion. about S810 million
less than he originally proposed in
January.
Under his proposal. aid to coun-
ties would be reduced by $400 mil-
lion. cities by $300 million. redevel-
opment by S200 million. special
districts by S300 million. and vehi-
cle license payments from the state
to local governments by S 100
million.
- The state cannot borrow money
without a budget. It has been forced
so far to issue $2.8 billion of IOUs.
or registered warrants. to pay Its
bills. The warrants are issued daily
by the state. with an interest rate of
5%. Interest casts to date are 86.8
million. 7
THE BOND BUYER
THURSDAY. AUGUST 27
°" TREASURY MARKET
Prices Rise, With 346-Year Up 5/8,
am Once Market Clears Supply Hurdle
By Susan Kellv
Treasury prices ended higher
yesterday as the market breathed a
sigh of relief after getting through
the second of this week's two note
sales. vesterdav_ 's auction of five-
year notes.
A weaker than expected report on
durable goods orders and the dol-
lar's new-found stability against
the market also aided the Treasury
market yesterday.
By late in the afternoon. the 30-
_vear bond was up % point to yield
7.41 %.
"The auction went pretty well."
said Jan Hurley. a market strate-
gist at Chase Securities. "The mar-
ket's doing better now because the
auction's out of the way. we don't
have supply again for a month. and
the dollar's stable."
The 610.5 billion of five-vear
notes came at an average yield of
5.74% and will bear a 5%% coupon.
That compares to the 5%% cou-
pon and 5.56% average yield at last
month's five-year sale.
The average yield was also the
highest yield at which securities
were awarded. which showed that
bidding for the notes was fairly ag-
gressive.
The 2.77-to- l ratio of bids en-
tered to the size of the auction was
average for a five-year sale. while
the $590 million of noncompetitive
bids from small Investors was
weaker than usual.
Once the bids were in. the when -
issued five-year traded up and took
the rest of the market with tt-
l.ate yesterday. the new five-year
note was yielding 5.67%. well below
the 5.74% average at the auction.
and traders said the market was
pleased with Its quick profit on the
issue.
The auction "was bought cor-
rectly and (the notesi seem to trade
well." a government note trader
said.
Ms. Hurley said some of the price
Improvement during the afternoon
was a belated reaction to the 3.4%
drop In July durable goods orders
reported yesterday morning. Trea-
sury prices rose only modestly after
the Indicator was released. even
though it was far below the consen-
sus forecast of a 0.5% gain in
orders.
Traders said that with this
week's new securities trading at a
profit, the dollar stable. and the
economv sell feeble. there was no
reason the bond market could not
add to its gains in coming days.
"We really have no coupon sup-
ply for another month. so if we con-
tinue to see some retail buying. I
think we can trend higher Into the
employment report." the note trad-
er said. The August Jobs report will
be released Sept- 4.
But economists said the dollar
could prove to be the fly In the
ointment.
Late yesterday. the dollar was
quoted at 1.4072 German marks.
up from 1.4015 late Tuesday.
The dollar has "stabilized In the
Treasury Market Yields
I
wwrr�
P.
wee
'thee- i
ear
3-Mor at 8i
32)
3.12
324 1
6-mold &t
3=
3.21
3.11 I
1-Yw&a
147
3.33
334 I
2-Year Note
425
199
425 I
3-Yw Nos
4.75
452
4'67
5-Yw Nan
5.65
5.39
+I
5.62
7•Yw Nor
6.1e
5.94
&IQ
1 aYer Nos
6.63
6.45
6.60
15-Yew Bona
7M
6.67
6.95 I
30-Year Bono
7,41
7.31
T"
screw rare. ratcomwrawwe
last day or so. and that's allowea
some of the improvement [in Trea-
sury prices) to take place. but
there's constant fear the slide will
resume." said Steven Slifer. an
economist at Lehman Brothers.
Ms. Hurley said the market's
gains yesterday were limited by
worries about the dollar.
"This whole rally could be gone
tomorrow If we come in and find the
dollar's at 1.3900 Imarksl." she
said.
Mr. Slifer sold the market's con-
cern about the dollar could increase
as the weekend approaches, be-
cause there has been talk of a re-
valuation of the exchange-rate
mechanism of the European Mone-
tary System. something that Is
typically done over the weekend.
Such a move would boost the mark
at the expense of the dollar.
Carl Weinberg. chlefeconomist of
High Frequency Economics, said
there was nothing to prevent the
dollar from making new lows
against the mark.
-'From the point of view of the
fundamentals. nothing has
Pkuw now w rRF.1.SujuES Purr 28
Treasuries
Continued from page 3
changed." Mr. Weinberg said_ "The
things that were adverse last week
continue to be adverse this week."
He said the negatives for the dol-
lar included unattractive U.S. yield
levels. the "limited amount of zip"
In the U.S. bond market. the widen-
Ing merchandise trade deficit. and
the political uncertainty aroused by
the presidential campaign.
Analysts said July's durable
goods orders were not as weak as
the 3.4`X, total decline suggested be.
cause most of the drop occurred in
the aircraft sector. Airplane orders
often post big moves in one dlrec-
tlon or the other.
Excluding transportation. July
durable goods orders rose 0.7%.
But even though the report "was
not as weak as it looks at first
blush. there was enough weakness
In enough of the categories to be
worried." said Sally Kleinman. a fl-
nanclal markets analyst at Chemi-
cal Securities.
Ms. Kleinman cited the declines
In primary metals, which she said
probabiv reflected the two -week
shutdown at General Motors last
month. and- in industrial ma-
chinery.
Analysts said the 1.4% declln
unfilled orders was even more
Curbing. It was the 1 I th decline
row Mn that component and brat
unfilled orders to their lowest l
since February 1989.
'-As long as the backlogs con
ue to fall. manufacturers won't
hiring workers to any signiHc
degree." said Daniel Seto. an ec
omist at Nikko Securities Comp:
International. "For the next
months. the outlook for growth
manufacturing employment
pretty grim.
President Bush's announcem-
yesterday of at "no -fly" zone
Southern Iraq did not affect Tr
sury prices. traders said.
The September bond futures a
tract closed 13/33 higher at 10423
In the cash market. the 7V4%
year bond was % higher. at 9738;
98. to yield 7.41%.
The 6%% 10-year note rose 111
to 9731/32-983/32. to yield 6.63%.
The three-year 4%% note was
1k, at 9910/32-9911/32. to yfe
4.75%.
In when -issued trading. the 4U
two-year note was up 3/33.
99u/33-100. to yield 4.25%. dot
from the 4.30% average at Tut
day's auction.
wo
11.01,
rr
r
ire
ud
er
tw
wo
tws
`ate'
err
THE BOND BUYER
FRIDAY. AUGUST 28
The
Municipal
Market
I By Sean Monsarrat j
Tax -Free Prices
Show Some Life,
Although Supply
Lurks on Horizon
Municipals regained some lost
confidence yesterday. and prices
rose about 1/4 point on average.
Dollar bonds led the way. with
some rebounding one point or more
after one of the most severe price
corrections since the late 1980s.
The market had fallen approxi-
mately four points on average since
last Friday. As new Issues were
postponed and supply thinned.
firmer Treasury prices helped
municipals get back on more solid
ground.
Treasury prices fell slightly early
yesterday after the tabor Depart-
ment reported that Initial state un-
employment insurance claims fell
92.000 to a seasonally adjusted
382.000 in the week ended Aug.
15.
But the government market re-
couped its losses as the focus re-
mained on the value of the dollar
and Improving technlcals. giving
the tax-exempt market support.
Although traders were cautious
about the market's health. they re-
ported Increased secondary activity
and a slightly stronger bid side.
'It had a better tone. and the
longer we can sustain that the more
confidence will develop." a trader
Plewe turn to MUNICIPALS Pere ?o
Municipals
Continued flora front page
said late In the day. "Make no mis-
take though. there is still a lot of
damage out there. and we're not out
of the woods vet."
Yields on mid -range serial bonds
lagged the rest of the market. trad-
ers said. remaining mostly un-
changed on the day. But dollar
bonds posted gains of i4 to 4% point
on average and some bonds popped
more than one point.
For examole, in secondary dollar
bond trading. Puerto Rico general
obligation 6s of 2014 were quoted
at 95%-tf2 to yield approximately
6.39% on the bid side.- The same
bond was quoted at 95%-Y4 to yield
6.41% late Wednesday. Reflecting
the stronger part of the market. Los
Angeles Department of Water and
Power 6s of 2032 were quoted at
95y4--V4 to yield 6.32%. compared to
9454--4 to yield 6.40% Wednesday.
In the debt futures market. the
MOB spread continued to narrow as
municipals improved over govern-
ments. Yesterday. the September
municipal contract settled up 74/=
to 96.31: the MOB spread narrowed
to negative 256 from negative 264
Wednesday.
Supply that choked the market
the last two weeks has dissipated
for the moment. The Bond Buyer's
30-dav visible supply fell $867.4
milllon to S3.74 billion yesterday.
while The Blue List of dealer Inven-
tory fell S90.9 million to $1.74
billion.
The decrease In supply has
helped the Street. which is still
heavy with bonds. to gain some
confidence and momentum. Mar-
ket players noted. however. that
new deals are expected to continue
to hit the primary because Issuers
are eager to capture still -low inter-
est rates.
New Issues
The primary sector was relatively
quiet yesterday but. In the negotiat-
ed sector. Goldman. Sachs & Co.
priced and repriced S50 million of
Trimble County. Ky.. pollution con-
trol revenue bonds for the Louis-
ville Gas and Electric Co.. subject to
the federal alternative minimum
tax. as a remarketing.
At the repricing. the reoffering
yield was lowered by five basis
points.
The final pricing included a 2020
bullet maturity. priced as 6.60s at
par.
The Issue is rated Aa2 by
Moody's. and the managers said
they expected Standard & Poor's to
rate the bonds AA.
In follow-through business. Leh-
man Brothers freed S350 milllon of
Orange County. Cant.. Local Trans-
portation Authority Measure M
sales tax revenue bonds from syn-
dicate restrlcUons.
In late secondary trading, the 6s
of 2009 were said to be trading at
the original reoffering yield. The
bonds were originally priced to
yield 6.20%.
First Boston Corp.. senior man-
ager for S 126 million of Charlotte.
N.C.. unlimited tax refunding
bonds. reported an unsold balance
of approximately S16 milllon.
Secondary Trading
For the first Ume in nearly one
week. traders reported some bid -
wanted flow in the secondary with
an improved bid. Activity centered
around bid -wanted lists. Including
a customer list in the $23 million
range. and an InsUtutlonal list in
the S100 million range. Some larg-
er bond blocks were said to be
changing hands. including 85 mil-
lion of California Water 6s of 2020
and S6 million of Virginia Trans-
portation 6s of 2019.
In other secondary dollar bond
trading. ChlcW GO AMBAC 536s of
2022 were quoted at 93-% to yield
6.40%. Florida Board of Educatlon
6s of 2022 were quoted at 9534-96%
to yield 6.31 %. and New York City
Water Authority 6s of 2017 were
quoted at 931h-34 to yield 6.53%.
In short-term note trading. yields
were unchanged to as much as five
to eight basis points lower on the
day.
In late action. Los Angeles Trans
were quoted at 3.15% bid. 3.05% of-
fered: Texas Trans were quoted at
3.14% bid. 3.02% offered: and Wis-
consin notes were quoted at 3.15%
bid. 3.05% offered. New York City
Tans were quoted at 2.90% bid.
2.80% offered. and New York State
Trans were quoted at 3.15% bid.
3.05% offered. L
40
MW
THE BOND BUYER
MONDAY, AUGUST 31
Traders Begin
Holiday Snooze;
Supply Slackens
Before Labor Day
owl
Municipals stabilized by last Fri-
4 lay but will likely stick to a narrow
price range during holidav time and
move again only wnen underwrit-
ers ers sell the next wave of new deals.
Prices gained as much as 1/4 point
last Thursdav and again on Fridav
:is the market began to recover al
wo
ter one of the most severe price cor-
rections in years.
The market lost about four points
last week as oversupply and a
weakening dollar combined to drive
bond priers lower.
'o
Looking ahead. market players
have begun to make progress on
their heavy Inventories and The
Blue List fell 8150.4 million to 81.59
billion by Friday.
ur
But 84 billion of new deals are
slated to be priced this week. and
the shadow calendar remains ro-
bust. At least 21 negotiated deals.
totaling 81.27 billion. were can-
celed last week, and are waiting In
the wings.
The number of bonds priced by
underwriters is likely to determine
near -term price prospects.
"we've still got a lot of wood to
chop, even though there Is light at
the end of the tunnel." said one
market player Friday. "As long as
underwriters don't get carried
away. this should be a buying op-
portunity for the true investor. The
market can handle around SI bil-
lion a week. but bring $5 billion of
new bonds and vou'll scare everv-
bodv away.'
The market Is likely to get a break
from issuance during the holidav
week. and some deals mav be post-
poned for a time, but Issuers re-
main eager to capture still -low in-
terest rates.
Looking to supply data. The Bond
Buyer's 30-dav visible supply on
Friday rose 8626 million. to 54.33
billion.
%W
Currently scheduled for sale in
the competitive sector this week are
8123 million of Denver various -
purpose bonds. $100 million of
Dade County. Fla.. revenue bonds.
ud
and S82 million of Los Angeles Mu-
nicipal Improvement Corp. revenue
bonds.
Dominating the negotiated calen-
dar are $245 million of Austin.
too
Tex.. combined utility systems rev-
enue refunding bonds. to be priced
by Morgan Stanley & Co.: $224 mil-
Ifon of Michigan State Housing De-
"ram
velopment Authority rental hour, -
Ing revenue bonds. to be priced by
First Boston: and 8200 mflllon of 11-
Ilnois Build 1111how revenue bonds.
Pkaw tuns to ARWICIPALS Pose I
Municipals
Continued hom hunt page
to be priced by PaineWebber.
The value of the dollar will also
occupy center stage with supply.
The Treasury market lost ground
on Fridav as the dollar weakened
again: municipals held steady.
thanks mostly to inacuvity.
The health of the economy.
meanwhile. has taken a back seat
to technical factors.
The importance of Fridav's Au-
gust employment report has dlmin-
Ished. although It wtil still be
watched and a surprise number
could move the markets.
Bond traders will also look for the
results of July single-family home
Sales. to be released today: July
leading indicators and construction
spending. to be released Tuesday:
and factory orders and Inventories
for July. to be released Wednesday.
Friday's Marko!
Municipal prices were un-
changed to 54 point higher in spots
early Friday as the market added to
a slightly better tone established on
Thursday.
But the value of the dollar. began
to weaken by mid -session and the
Treasury market headed into nega-
tive territory. Municipal market
players reured from the action as a
result. and the market maintained
Its gains.
In the debt futures market. the
September municipal contract set-
tled up 11/32. to 97.10.
Secondary dollar bond quotes
were unchanged to S4 point better
near the close.
In late trading. Chicago GO AM-
BAC 53%s of 2022 were quoted at
93u4--% to yield 6.38%. Puerto Rico
6s of 2014 were quoted at 95-%--% to
yield 6.39%. and Florida Board of
Education 6s of 2022 were quoted
at 96-% to yield 6.29%. Los Angeles
Department of Water and Power tis
of 2032 were quoted at 95%-44 to
yield 6.3 1 % and New York City Wa-
ter Authority 6s of 2017 were
quoted at 94-1A to yield 6.48%.
In the short-term note sector.
yields were unchanged to as much
as five basis points higher on the
day. traders said.
In late action. Los Angeles tax
and revenue anticipation notes
were quoted at 3.15% bid. 3.10% of-
fered. Texas Trans were quoted at
3.16% bid. 3.10% offered. and Wis-
consin notes were quoted at 3.15%
bid. 3.10% offered. New York City
tax anticipation notes were quoted
at 2.90% bid. 2.195% offered. and
New York State Tian were quoted
at 3.20% bid. 3.22% offered. O
W
tr
ttt•I
Will
sad
No
aI�
to
bid
t1W
tali
tqd
bw
`7t/
THE BOND BUYER
MONDAY. AUGUST 31
California Arms
To Beat Clock
On Debt Service
With Fiscal Plan
By Patrice Hill
'WASHINGTON — California offl
clals were struggling Friday to tea
down remaining obstacles to pay
ing the debt service on $2.2 blllloi
of lease revenue bonds that com,
due tomorrow.
The -state Senate was preparini
to vote on a compromise budge
drafted by Senate President Davit
Roberti. D-Los Angeles. and Senate
Republican Leader Ken Maddy o
Fresno. Legislators hoped to com
plete action on the budget and plact
:t on Gov. Pete Wilson s desk bt
today.
The governor s signature on such
a plan. which contains appropria-
(ions for the bonds' lease pay-
ments. would ensure Umely pay-
ment for all 13 state Issues that
have $109 million of debt service
due tomorrow. stale officials said.
Meanwhile. state Controller Gray
Davis' office worked all day Frldav
to Iron out a remaining legal wrin-
kle that has prevented the control.
ler from providing state Treasurer
Kathleen Brown with the cash to
make payment on most of the
bonds even without an enacted
budget.
The controller called In "a host of
lawyers" to provide an opinion
showing he has the authority to use
cash on hand to make the lease
bond payments through the gov-
ernment's "continuing approprta-
dons" authority, said Marsha
Kwaidwasser. deputy to Mr. Davis.
"It's a question of tightening up
the opinion. I expect this will be re-
solved today. but we must be satls-
fled that everything Is proper." she
said Friday. "We are looking at
some legal Issues that haven't been
raised since the 1930s."
At Issue was whether Section
13340 of the government code.
Please turn to CALIFORNIA Page fo
California
Continued from front page
unich "sunsets the government's
continuing appropriations author-
!tv for some programs when a oud-
tiethas not been enacted. could pre.
, ent the controller from maxing the
pavments. state oillcials said. The
-.late has oeen ooeraune without a
`ormai budget since July 1 .
Once this remaining legal hurdle
9 cleared. the state will have tiavea
is wav to making tomorrow s bond
-ayments. she said. On Thursoay.
-tale Finance Director Thomas W.
�Iavep provided Mr. Davis with ad-
litlonal autflorILV that he nerds to
'n axe [he payments by cerulving
'!'tat the Leglslature had not as vet
approved the lease appropriations.
%fr. Haves certification should
rnable the state to avoid tapping
ntodeat service reserves to pay the
lcbt service on 1 1 of the 13 bond is-
sues with payments due tomorrow.
state officials said. The roughly $2
billion of issues are all by the
Mate s Public Works l3oard.
,)tie of the other two issues with
::avments due. a 1991 Department
A Transportation to the East WV
Building Authority certificates of
parucipauon issue. is expected to
be paid out of capitalized interest
funds. rating officials said.
-anted. said Ihev would like to see
:he legislation enacted to orevent
lnv future 'scares over the lease
oonas.
- lime major faune agencies last
Week put some or au of the states
:ease revenue bonds on credit alert.
pending resolution at the lease pay-
ment problem. Fitch Investors Ser-
ice. in a release late Thursoay. ex-
tended its alert in the state's GO
.:rbt as well as to its lease -secured
,:ands.
711e unwillingness of the state
to Insulate Its obligations to bond-
holders Irom Its internal budget
Jisoute is extremely negative to
overall credit." Fitch maintained.
`.Ioodv's Investors Service and
Standard & Poor s Corp. had
warned that the state should spe-
citically avoid dipping into the debt
service reserves to pay the bonds.
Standard & Poor s Vice President
Jeffrev J. Thelmann said resorting
to the debt service reserves would
be a kind of "technical default."
George Leung. Moodv s managing
director for state ratings. termed it
a 'oavment default."
Mate mflclals from Ms. Brown on
,sown have protested that the use of
the debt service reserves does not
constitute an event of default under
the bond Indentures for most of the
Issues.
California's controller called into host of lawyers' for on
opinion showing he can use cash on hand to make the
lease bond payments, an aide says.
in addition. the state made head-
wav Friday in its efforts to find the
:unds to pay a final bond Issue — .t
3163.5 million series 1988 Los An.
:eles State Building Authority issue
— without having to resort to the
use of debt service reserves. they
,iald.
With hopes rising that the state
Legislature could complete a budget
.agreement by Manday. lawmakers
on Frfdav tabled emergency legisla-
tion that would authorize payment
)t the lease obligations out of exlst-
Ing revenues without dipping into
the reserve funds.
"There is a 95% chance we will
have a budget by Itodavl. so we ve
put the bill on file for now." David
Takashima. legislative analyst for
Assemblyman Steve Peace. D-San
Diego. who chairs the Assembly's
Banking. Finance. and Bonded In-
debtedness Committee. said Fri-
day. "But if there Isn't a budget. we
may take up the bill" today.
The legislation would put In place
permanent authority for the state
to make rental and energy service
contract payments without an en-
acted budget. and thus would pro-
hibit this year's lease payment de-
bacle from reoccurring.
Gov. Wilson has signaled that he
does not support the emergency
legislation and would prefer to take
the administrative route being
paved by the controller's otflce.
However. rating agency officials.
who have been watching the state's
machinations over the lease bonds
closely to determine whether an-
other mind n(.[n•v.e.-..a» •- _.__
he Indentures cicarly speclfv
what would represent a default.
and using the reserve is not Idenu-
tied as one of those conditions. '
%aid George Valverde. assistant
Inxiget manager sit the state De-
parurient of Finance. who plays a
rote in making bond payments an
the Public Works Board Issues.
Fitch agreed in its release. "The
use of the reserve funds. while an
indication that debt service don
nit hold a sacrosanct position. Is
not of Itself that "auve. if mplen-
Ished. since a major purpose of the
reserve is to protect against Late
budget adoption." the agency said.
Fitch nevertheless said the inci-
dent raises larger issues about the
state's creditworthiness.
Mr. Leung also agreed that the In-
dentures do not define use of the
debt service reserves as a default.
and noted that Moody's has been
careful not to use that word in its
releases. But he said that to some
extent. whether it Is considered a
default is "in the eyes of the be-
holder."
We distinguish between a big 'd'
where the bondholder is not paid.
and a tittle'd.' " wherethedebt ser-
vice reserves are accessed. he said.
"The bigger issue is that resort-
ing to the reserve funds raises the
issues of the willingness of the state
to appropriate. as well as how it re-
gards the Importance of meeting Its
debt service obligation In a respon-
stble manner to protect its payment
record." he said.
Debora Vrana contributed to thu or
Municipal
Market
By Sean htonsarrat
Tax -Free Prices
Rise About 1/8;
New Issuance
Light This Week
Municipal prices were un-
changed to kh point higher In dull
holiday trading yesterday as the
market continued Its slow recovery
from last week's puce drops.
Prices improved slightly for the
third session In a row yesterday af-
ter the crushing blows suffered ear-
ly last week.
Tax -exempts took their lead from
the Treasury market yesterday but
worries over a weaker dollar and
concern about the release of August
employment data Friday prevented
both markets from accomplishing
much.
Treasury traders were hesitant
enough so that not even weak eco-
nomic data were able to Inspire
more than a slight move higher.
Municipals rose about %.
Sales of new single-family homes
in July fell 2.6%. to a seasonally ad -
lusted annual rate of 563.000. the
Commerce Department reported.
Most analysts expected a modest
i!atn of I % to 3% in July.
The decline followed a revised
..3.3% gain in June sales, originally
reported as a 7.9% gain.
In addition. the Chlcagoland
business barometer decreased to
58.4% In August on a seasonally
adjusted basis from 59.2% In July.
Please turn to MUNICIPA S Page.i8
THE BOND BUYER
TUESDAY. SEPTEMBER 1
Municipals
Continued bvm front We
the Purchasing Management Asso-
ciation of Chicago said.
An Index reading below 50% sig-
nals a slowing economy. while a
level above 50% suggests ex-
pansion.
In the debt futures market. the
September municipal contract set-
tled down J/32. to 97.07.
A break from new Issuance gave
the Street some breathing room to
work on inventory. The Bond Buver's
30-day visible supply rose to S4.98
billion. but The Blue List fell $90.6
million. to $1.5 billion.
Through Aug. 28. $150.7 billion
of new issues have been priced this
year. compared to S 104.7 billion for
the same period In 1991. a 43.91 %
Increase.
New Issuance was light yester-
day. dominated by Goldman. Sachs
& Co.'s pricing of S130 million Ta-
coma. Wash.. Electric System re-
funding revenue bonds in the nego-
tiated sector.
At the repricing. yields on the
2009 and 2010 maturities were
lowered by five basis points.
The final reoffering scale includ-
ed serial bonds priced to yield from
4.60% In 1996 to 6.25% In 2009. A
2012 term. contalrrfng $33 million
of the loan. was priced as 51hs to
yield 6.25%.
The Issue is insured by the AM-
BAC Indemnity Corp. and Is triple-
A rated by Moody's Investors Ser-
vice and Standard & Poor's Corp.
In follow-through business.
Smith Barney. Harris Upham & Co.
as senior manager freed $296 ma -
lion of Clark County. Nev.. McCar-
ran international Airport passen.
ger facility charge revenue bonds
from syndicate restrictions.
In late secondary trading. the
AMBAC-Insured 6s of 2022 were
quoted at 6.35% bid. 6.34% offered.
The bonds were originally priced to
yield 6.35%.
Secondary Trading
Activity was dominated by some
small bid -wanted lists and some
small block of bonds.
In secondary dollar bond trading.
Prices were unchanged to up as
much as 54 point on the day.
In late trading. Chicago GO 5%9
of 2022 were quoted at 93V4-W4 to
yield 6.38%. Puerto Rico GO 6s of
2014 were quoted at 95-%--Y4 to yield
6.39%. and Florida Board of Educa-
tion 69 of 2022 96V4-I6 to yield
6.27%. Los Angeles Department of
Water and Power 6s of 2032 were
quoted at 95%-95-Y4 to yield 6.31 %
and New York City Water Authority
6s of 2017 were quoted at 94-94'h
to yield 6.48%.
In the short-term note market.
yields were five to seven basis
points lower on the day.
In late trading. Los Angeles
Trans were quoted at 3.08% bid.
3.05% offered. Texas Trans were
quoted at 3.05% bid. 3.03% offered.
and Wisconsin notes were quoted
at 3.08% bid. 3.05% offered. New
York City Tans were quoted at
3.03% bid. 3% offered. and New
York State Trans were quotes
3.15% bid. 3.10% offered.
Postponed Deals
PaineWebber Inc.. senior man
er for S250 million Illinois refui
Ing bonds scheduled to be negoti
ed this week. said the deal has be
postponed.
The Issue joins 27 other be
deals set for negotiated pricing ti
have been placed on a "day-to-da
basis because of unstable mart
conditions.
wo
t"
wo
4"
kw
t"
tod
No
aw
To: Sonia Payne
From: Steve Coma/Melissa Waters
Re: $98,500,000
Certificates of Participation
County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1,2,3,6,7 & 11 of
Orange County, California
Deal Number:
Dated Date:
Sale Date:
Delivery Date:
Delivery Location:
Bond Counsel & Closing Location:
Time:
Trustee/Paying Agent:
Funds Due at Closing:
045-24442
September 1,1992
September 1,1992
September 1, 1992
New York, NY
Edward W. Long, Esq./Carolyn Clark, Esq.
Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon
333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2020
Los Angeles, CA 90071
213/613-1112 FAX:213/680-1358
8:00 am PST
Steve Rivero
State Street Bank & Trust Co. of California
725 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3100
Los Angeles, CA 90017
213/362-7345 FAX:213/362-7357
$97,958,250.00
Owl
6Z Merrill Lynch
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
108" ELLIS AVENUE
P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
1714) 952-2411
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
SEPTEMBER 9, 1992 - 7:30 P.M.
D
F�
FUN NO 9199
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AF43
CCUNTY SANITATICN
DISTRICTS OF CRANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS
PAID 08/12/92
POSTING DATE
08/12/92
WARRANT NO.
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
123917
AC TECH COMPANY
$629741.98
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
123918
ASP ANALYSIS
S880.00
ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS
123919
ACADEPIC FRESS
S282.31
LAB SUPPLIES
123920
ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC
S310.00
LAB
223921
ACCU - SLUDGE
$622.52
SLUDGGEE SAMPLER
123922
ACTICN RENTALS
12:602.00
EQUIPMBNT RENTALS
123923
ADVANCO CCNSIRUCTPRS INC
S906462.00
CONSTRUCTION P1-34-3, P1-35-2, J-21
n
123924
AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS I
S229571.18
O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN SYST M.O.8-9-89
C'
123925
ALCORN FENCE CO
$29160.00
FENCING
m
123926
ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT
312*500.00
ASPHALT
d
123927
ALFHACA2
$19233927
SPECIALTY GASES
n
123528
HEPMAh-FHINNEY-KCEYUR
110049.39
MACHINE PARTS
123929
AVER SCCIETY OF CIVIL ENGR
$995.00
PUBLICATION
123930
ROBCO INC &/OR AMERICAN SEALS
S467.42
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
m
123931
AMERICAN SIGMA
S19168.31
OPERATING SUPPLIES
3
123932
APER SOCIETY FCR MICROBIOLC
S312.00
PUBLICATION
123533
APEPICAh IVPE CLLTURE CCLLECTN
$228.75
LAB SUPPLIES
�
123934
AhCREWvS CLASS CC
$79201#80
LAB SUPPLIES
123935
AQUATIC TESTING LABORATORY
S49900.00
LAB SERVICES
1
123936
ARATEX SERVICES INC
$39553.71
UNIFORM RENTALS
123937
ARTZCNA INSTRUMENT
S29157.12
INSTRUMENT PARTS
123938
RALPF W ATKINSCN
$19417907
PUMP
r
123535
RAhCCLPF AUSTIN CC
S849.94
TUBING
123940
BKK LANCFILL
S79214.98
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
t=j
123941
BRW SAFETY & SUPPLY
$19169945
SAFETY SUPPLIES
C/)
223942
BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE
S32.00
BACKFLOW TESTING
123943
RALLIN CCNSTRLCTICN CO
$69390.00
MANHOLE COVERS
123944
BARCLAYS LAW FLBLIShERS
S168.38
PUBLICATIONS
123545
PA71EPY SFECIALIIES
S705.66
BATTERIES
123946
BAXTER CIACNOSTICS INC
S159373.42
LAB SUPPLIES
Cn
123947
BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS
S19200.00
SERVICE AGREEMENT
123948
RIO TECH NET• INC
S163.71
SERVICE AGREEMENT
123949
BCFHPINGEF MAhNHEIM
$101929
LAB SUPPLIES
123950
BPINCERSCN CCRF
S59954.00
CONSTRUCTION J-19-2
123951
BRCWh & CALCWELL CONSULTING
$719723.72
ENGINEERING SERVICES J-12-1
123952
BUDGET JANITORIAL
S19650.00
JANITORIAL SERVICES
123953
BUILDERPS EMPORIUM
S216.80
HARDWARE
1239°4
PURKE ENGINEERING CC
S809.58
ELECTRIC PARTS
1239ES
GARY G STREEC
S19846.71
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
1239E6
BUTLER FIFER CCPPAhY
$72.38
OFFICE SUPPLIES
123957
C M I
S29375.42
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
123958
SUMMIT SOLUTIONS9 INC
$454.23
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
123959
CAL -PAC CHEMICAL CO INC
S201.90
CHEMICALS
123960
CALTRCL INC
S39284.38
INSTRUMENT PARTS
123961
JC14K R CALAFPICE FhC
9189388.55
OCEAN MONITORING M.0.11-14-90
123962
CALIFCRNIA AUTC CCLLISION INC
S844.37
TRUCK PARTS
a
N
FURD NC 919Q
- JT CIST WCRKINC CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 FAGF 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CCLK7Y
SANITATICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID (^8/12/92 POSTING DATE
08/12/92
WARRANT NO.
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
123963
CALIFCRNIA AUTOMATIC GATE
S908.74
SERVICE AGREEMENT
123964
CALIFCRNIA JCURKAL INC
$167000
TRAINING REGISTRATION
123965
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC FINANCE
S545.00
PUBLICATION
123966
CFNTER FOR STUDY OF LAW B POLI
$64.65
PUBLICATIONS
1239E7
CENTIRY SAFETY INST A SUFP
$69374.56
SAFETY SUPPLIES
123968
ChEVFCN (SA 1RC
S59391.05
OIL & GREASE
123969
ChILCRENOS HCSPITAL CF O.C.
S154.54
REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
D
123970
SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING
S89563.42
BUILDING MATERIALS
+m
123971
CLEAN -EX FAPER A CHEMICAL
S407.55
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
m
Z
123972
ThE COEB GRCUP
$127.15
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
C!
12�973
CCPFASS ELEC70CKICS CCRP
S54.35
INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
D
123974
CCPFUSA• INC.
S19220.15
COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE
123975
CONAPDOS PHOTOGRAPHY
$269.38
PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
123976
CONSCLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST
S89010.74
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
m
123977
CCRTINENTAL AIR TOCLS INC
S398.90
TOOLS
3
123978
CCCPER IRCLS7RIES INC
$139728.16
COMPRESSOR PARTS
123979
COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
S615.79
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
123900
CRANE VEYOR CORP
$74.21
SAFETY SUPPLIES
Cb
1239FI
THE REGENTS CF THE UNIVERSITY
$69145.00
NWRI PROJECT FEES
123582
CA CEFT CF HEALTh SERVICES
$49808000
REGISTRATION - LAB ACCREDITATION
123523
STATE CF CALIFCRNIA
$13.306.09
STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
n
123984
DE ANZA CORFCRATION
S150000
EQUIPMENT RENTALS
r
r
123985
DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS
S189.53
LAB SUPPLIES
123986
DEW -PAR SALES A SERVICE
S536.55
MANHOLE PARTS
t=
1239P7
DEZURTK AND/CR CS CO
S19715.39
VALVE PARTS
123908
CIATEC EK%IRCNPERTAL
S39894.79
CHEMICALS
1239E9
CIFILIPFC ASSCCIATES
S19224.58
PRINTING
123990
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP
S39674.36
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
�-,
123991
DISCO PRINT COMPANY
$132.01
OFFICE SUPPLIES
C7
123552
DORADC ERTERFRISES INC
S219459.4C
PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS
12395Z
RCRERT F ERIVER ASSCC
S3.700.07
BOND -COMP INSURANCE
123554
CLNR ECUIRCS CCRP
S539.96
PAINT SUPPLIES
123995
CYNA7ECh LABCRATCRIES
S189012.71
LAB EQUIPMENT
123996
EASTMAN INC
S49777.65
OFFICE SUPPLIES
123997
DONALD ELDER
S29166.00
REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
123998
ENCHANTER INC
$5s040.00
OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91
123959
FALCCN CISPCSAL SERVICE
S39640.00
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
124CCC
JChN B FALKENSTEIN FE
S39400630
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16
124001
FARR SALES A SERVICE
S89317.03
FILTERS
124002
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
S316.00
AIR FREIGHT
124043
FERRELLGAS
$102.07
PROPANE
124004
FISChER I PCRTER CO
S982.70
CHLORINATION PARTS
1240-05
FISHER SCIEN71FIC CC
$169.36
LAB SUPPLIES
124CC6
FISCRS 1N:TRLPEN7S
S2229023.19
LAB EQUIPMENT M.0.2-19-92
124067
FLC-SYSTEPS
$69350.81
PUMP PARTS
124008
CLIFFORD A FOPKERT
$69445.85
SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-12-91
N
a
I
W
FUND NC 9199
- JT CIST WCRKINC CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 FAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CCUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS
PAID 08/12/92
POSTING DATE
08/12/92
WARRANT NC.
VENCCR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
124005
FCLNIAIN VALLEY CAMERA
$66.64
FILM
12401D
CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY
$49316.80
WATER USE
124n11
FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT
S316.30
PAINT SUPPLIES
124012
FCR INDUSTRIAL SALES
S248.46
OFFICE FURNITURE
124013
GMC TRUCK A BUS CROUF
$139215.54
VEHICLE
124C14
CSTV INC.
$19001084
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
D
124015
GANAFL LLPHER CO
$516.86
HARDWARE
G)
124016
GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY
$3 054.73
CHEMICALS
m
224917
GENERAL ELECTRIC CC
S840.00
ELECTRIC REPAIRS
Z
t7
124018
GENERAL ELECTRIC SLPPLY CC.
S804.52
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
124015
GIFRLTCI--117CFELL INC
5366.71
MECHANICAL PARTS
124020
GRAPHIC CCNTROLS
S347.94
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
'-'
124021
DON GREEK 9 ASSOCIATES
$16*606*UC•
SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-12-91
m
124022
HAAKER EGLIFPENT CC
$19679959
VALVE
3
124023
HACH CCPFANY
S389.28
CHEMICALS
124024
HARRINGTCN INCLSIRIAL FLAS7I
S29.05
VALVE
124025
HAULAWAY CONTAINERS
$39805.00
TRASH REMOVAL
00
124026
EG HELLERSS SON INC
$98.72
TOOLS
1
124027
HEWLETT FACKARC
$39665.50
SERVICE AGREEMENTS
124028
HICKS INC. FIEERCLASS CCRP
5100.00
FIBERGLASS REPAIRS
3:-
124029
HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC
$674.73
MECHANICAL PARTS
124030
HORIZON HIGH REACH S EQUIP
$179.48
TRUCK PARTS
r
124031
J.T. HORVATH d ASSOC.
S39000.00
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17
t7
124032
RS HUGHES CC INC
$19268.06
SAFETY SUPPLIES
�
1240:3
HUNTER CCFFCRATICN
S193579302.32
CONSTRUCTION J-19-1
--q
124034
CITY OF 1-UNTING70N BEACh
$20.41
WATER USE
124035
HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA
$266.25
OFFICE SUPPLIES
�-+
124036
HYPROTEX INC
$8 045.55
OIL
C7
124037
IPC INDLS7RIES
S237.28
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
�
1240!P.
THE IDEA EANK
S111.13
PUBLICATION
124039
IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL
$269271.98
FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-14-90
124040
INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRCDLCTS
S935.54
CONNECTORS
124041
TNFCTRIEVE
$51.00
PUBLICATION
124042
INGRAP PAPER
$39349.52
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124043
INTERMOUNTAIN SCIENTIFIC CORP
$275.63
LAB SUPPLIES
124()44
PACTEL TELETRAC
S376.81
NOTEBOOK COMPUTER RENTAL
124045
INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEPS
$29306.07
BATTERIES
124046
IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT
S19879o,448.27
SEWAGE CAPACITY PURCHASE M.0.6-10-92
124047
IRVINE RANCH IAIER CISTRICT
S124.27
WATER USE
124048
JLA CRECIT CCRP
S145.32
MICROFICHE READER LEASE
124049
GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP
S19200.29
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124050
JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO
$49868.23
INSTRUMENT PARTS
1240E1
JCHNS70KE SLPPLY
$64.38
ELECTRIC PARTS
1240P2
KARS• ACVANCEE MATERIALS INC
$41944000
LAB SERVICES
1240!3
THE KEI7F CCPFANIES
$824.50
ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35
124F154
KELLY SERVICES
S705.33
TEMPORARY SERVICES
il
D
I
VJ
D
1
FUND NC 9199
- JT CIST WCRKINC CArITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8107192 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CCUNTY
SANI7ATICN DISTRICTS OF GRANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID U8/12/92 POSTING DATE
08/12/92
WARRANT NO.
VFNDCR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
1240°C_
KING REAFING INC
S299.61
MACHINE SUPPLIES
124056
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES
S19339.42
PAINT SUPPLIES
124057
MARTIN KORDICK SR
S39264.60
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9
1240°8
LNP ENGINEERING PLASTICS
S29885.71
REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
124DE9
LA CELLLLAR TELEFFCNE CC
$481.38
SERVICE AGREEMENTS
124C(0
LA LIOLIC HANCLING SYSTEMS
1793.75
MECHANICAL PARTS
124061
LAB SUFFCRT
S585.00
TEMPORARY SERVICES
n
124062
LAYMAN• JONES S DYE9 LAWYEPS
S89967.G1
LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER INDUSTRIES
C)
124063
ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION
$200.00
PUBLICATIONS
m
124064
LEGI-TECF
S550.00
COMPUTER SERVICES
:z
124065
LTPITCRCLE CCRF
$124.68
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
L7
124066
SOCC••LYNCF CCRP
$878.12
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124067
MFS
195.90
PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
124168
MACOMCO
S668.85
SERVICE AGREEMENT
124CE9
MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS INC
S29991.52
MECHANICAL PARTS
r
124070
MANOIC PE70RE
$120@00
TOWING SERVICES
3
124071
MANHCLE ADJUSTING
S89910.00
MANHOLE ADJUSTING SERVICES
t1t
124072
MANLEYI'S ROILEP REPAIR CO• INC
$39515.84
BOILER REPAIRS
00
124073
MAP.VAC ELECTRONICS
$19.50
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
124074
MATT - ChLCR INC
$19235.22
CHLORINATION PARTS
124075
D A MATTFELS B ASSCCIATES
$19764.00
INSTRUMENT
D
124076
CCN MALPFF
S59790.00
OCEAN MONITORING
r-
124077
MC AFEE ASSCCIATES
$59469.75
COMPUTER SOFTWARE LICENSE
r
124078
MCKENNA ENGR 8 EQUIP
S196.01
PUMP PARTS
d
124079
MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS INC
$419.86
INSTRUMENT PARTS
r-r
124080
MICRCSOFT CORF
$159.00
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
C/3
224081
PIKKES07A LESTERN VISUAL PPES.
$545.58
OFFICE SUPPLIES
124C82
P17CFELL INSTRUMENT CC
$372.00
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
70
124083
MCOICCN9 INC
$943900
ENGINEERING SERVICES
C")
124084
MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES
$99982.06
LAB SERVICES
--A
124C85
MOTICN INDUSTRIES INC
S19159.00
MECHANICAL PARTS
Cn
1240EG
MUGGE ROSE CUTHRIE ALEXANCE
$79126.42
FINANCIAL SERVICES M.0.3-13-91
124CEI
NATICNAL SAFETY CCLNCIL
$69.35
SAFETY FILM RENTAL
124088
NATICNAL LATER RESEARCH
$24*143.00
WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE GRANT
124089
NEWARK ELECTRONICS
1698.50
INSTRUMENT PARTS
124n90
CITY OF NEWPORT NLACH
$4.25
WATER USE
124051
DX SYSTEMS CC
$219577.68
CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91
124092
CRANCE CCLNTY ALTC PARTS C
$40.81
TRUCK PARTS
124C53
CPANCE C(LNTY CFEMICAL CC
S29645.92
CHEMICALS
124094
GRANGE VALVE S FITTING CC.
S19587.39
FITTINGS
124095
ORITEX CORP
319200.19
MECHANICAL PARTS
124096
OXYGEN SERVICE
S760.51
SPECIALTY GASES
124057
PC SYSTEMS DESIGN
$483.89
COMPUTER HARDWARE
124058
PCL FACRICINC
$316.95
REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
124099
PST
$434.61
MECHANICAL PARTS
124100
PACIFIC PARTS
S349.01
INSTRUMENT PARTS
`C C
a
�
lJ"I
FUND NC 9199
- J1 DIST h(FKING CAFIIAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY
SANITATION
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08/12/92
POSTING DATE
08/12/92
WARRANT NC.
VEACOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
124101
PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CC
S658.51
SAFETY SUPPLIES
12411i2
PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS
$272.14
TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
124103
PAK LEST
S19319.3R
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124104
PARA(CN CABLE
S36.78
CABLE SERVICES
124105
FERKIN-ELFER CCPFCRATION
$833.22
LAB SUPPLIES
1241Jt
PIPA GRC SYSTEMS INC
S2479161.60
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91
124107
FLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE
544.08
HARDWARE
D
124108
POLYMETRICS• INC.
$109423.14
EQUIPMENT RENTALS
rn
124109
PCLYPUPE INC
$249123.05
CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
Z
124110
PCSITIVE FCRP,LLATCRS9 INC.
S241.50
CHEMICALS
t=
124111
PREMIER FRINTING CORP.
$49834.75
PRINTING
124112
HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE
$262.50
ICE
124113
THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO.
S49720.00
INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91
124114
QUESTRON CCRF
$179157.00
LAB EQUIPMENT
m
124115
RJE 1NTERNATICNAL9 INC
$732.31
LAB SUPPLIES
3
12411E
RD SYSIEFS IAC
$29222.00
SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS
124117
RECYC INC
S449840.82
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91
OO
124118
REGIONAL MEDIA LABORATORY
S641.57
LAB SUPPLIES
124119
MCJUNKIN-FEPUPLIC SUFPLY
S1*893.97
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
1
124120
RCYAL BLSINESS FCRMS INC
S534.86
PRINTING
124121
RCYCE INSTRLMENI
S232.38
INSTRUMENT PARTS
n
r--
124122
RYAN-NERCO
S19777.88
METER
r-
124123
JOSEPH T RYERSON 8 SON IN
S464.08
METAL
124124
SAFELY-KLEEN CGPF
S173.40
PARTS CLEANER
d
124125
SANTA FE 1NCUSTRIAL PLASTICS
$3.907*72
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
124126
SCI-UlhG AFERICA
3309.46
PUMP PARTS
-�j
1241P.7
SEA COAST DESICAS
S118.52
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
;V
124128
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
S285.50
WATER USE
§-_)
124129
SEL SALES INC
$752.34
METER
4
124130
SHAMRCCK SUPFLY
S118.39
HARDWARE
C/)
124131
SHURELUCK SALES
$140163089
HARDWARE
1241.12
SIGMA CHEPICAL CO
S40.26
PUBLICATIONS
124133
SKILL FATHe INC.
S198.00
TRAINING REGISTRATION
124134
SKYPARK WALK■IN MECICAL CLI
S1v614.00
PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
124139
SMITh P I F E E SLFPLY INC
$251.80
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
1241L6
SCLTPERN CALIF EDISCN CC
$3319579.82
POWER
124137
STAMLN 2 SPASSOFF FE
$39920.U0
ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.3-11-92
124138
WESTALLOY INC
$19391.41
WELDING SUPPLIES
124139
STAPLES
$89.09
OFFICE SUPPLIES
124140
STAR TCCL 6 SUPPLY CC
$69087.88
TOOLS
124141
STERLING ART
S93.02
ART SUPPLIES
124142
STROPPOTNE PRINTING
S39728.15
PRINTING
124143
SUMMIT STEEL
$737.4C
METAL
124144
SUN ELECTRIC CORP
S232.37
TRUCK PARTS
124145
SUPER ICE CCRP
$81.76
LAB SUPPLIES
124146
SUP-LITE CCRPCRATION
$551.34
MECHANICAL PARTS
D
1,11
Z
:E--x
I
FUND NO 9199
- JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8107/92 PAGE 6
C
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIPS PAIC
06/12/92 POSTING DATE
08/12/92
WARRANT NO.
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
124147
SYSTAT
S205.LO
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
124148
TCH ASSCCIATES
S421.00
LAB SUPPLIES
124149
TAYLCR-CINA PFG CCPFAAY
S390.42
ELECTRIC CART PARTS
124150
TE90HAULICS
$59064932
MACHINE REPAIRS
124151
TELAUTOGRAPH CORPORATION
S168.35
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
124152
THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL
5184.44
INSTRUMENT PARTS
124153
THCMAFON PECHANICAL COPP
$19600.00
PUMP REPAIRS
n
124154
THCPPSCN 1NCUSTRIPL SLPFLY
$22.82
MECHANICAL PARTS
m
124155
7CNYIS LCCK & SAFE SERVICE
S96.55
LOCKSMITH SERVICES
m
124156
TOYO LANCSCAPING CO
S1.555.00
CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.11-13-91
z
124157
TRANSCHEM
SIr043.68
REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
d
D
124158
TRUCK R AUTO SUPPLY INC
$230.71
TRUCK PARTS
124159
THE LNISCLP.CE CCRF
$363.12
OFFICE SUPPLIES
124160
UNITEC PARCEL SERVICE
$315.19
PARCEL SERVICES
m
1241E1
VCC TESTING
S7*D00.00
EMISSIONS TESTING
3
124162
VLR SCIENTIFIC
S89848.37
LAB SUPPLIES
124163
VS SYSTEMS INC
$155.90
INSTRUMENT PARTS
124164
VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO
S19145.79
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
00
1241E5
VARIAN .ANALYTICAL INSTRUPENTS
$19123.53
LAB SUPPLIES
124166
VILLAGE NLRSERTES
$60.64
LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
I
124167
HAYLCRTt• IACCRPCRATEC
$805.97
OFFICE FURNITURE
D
124168
YESTERN STATES CFEMICAL SUPPLY
$509183.96
CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90
r
124169
WESTIN ENGINEERING
S29167.20
ENGINEERING SERVICES
r
124170
WESCO
$2*541.40
ELECTRIC PARTS
t:l
124171
YHATPAN LAB SALES INC
$25.85
LAB SUPPLIES
P-4
124172
WHITNEY PACHINERY INC
S19508.58
TRUCK PARTS
C/7
124173
6OVE4LY9 TAC
$329.93
LAB SUPPLIES
--I
124174
YERCX CCRP
$89948080
COPIER LEASES
pa
124175
ZIEbARTH R ALPER/C.S. ALPER
$409000.00
CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1
Cn
TOTAL CLAIKS FAIL OP/12/92
$599249171.15
-----------------
-----------------
D
I
C31
i
v
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/07/92 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08/12/92 POSTING DATE 08/12/92
SUMMARY
AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND
$595.00
#2 OPER FUND
$9,143.84
#2 CAP FAC FUND
$6,022.15
#3 OPER FUND
$24,773.87
G'l
#5 OPER FUND
$10,752.02
M
#5 CAP FAC FUND
$4,831.90
d
#7 OPER FUND
$2,917.07
#7 CAP FAC FUND
$1,882,094.30
#11 OPER FUND
$6,691.01
#14 OPER FUND
$82.24
RI
#14 CAP FAC FUND
$6,869.80
3
#5&6 OPER FUND
$203.65
#6&7 OPER FUND
$3,813.12
#7&14 OPER FUND
$170.39
00
JT OPER FUND
$1,003,566.85
CORF
$2,815,662.45
SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS
$0.00
b
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND
$145,981.49
r--------------
;5,924,171.15
f/)
f7
-i
C/)
a
C7d
FUND NO 9199
- JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE I
REPORT NUMBER AP43
I-Z
COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAIC 08/26/92 POSTING DATE
O8/26/92
WARRANT NO.
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
124193
AG TECH COMPANY
5729305.35
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
124154
ASR ANALYSIS
S29380000
ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS
124155
A T 8 T
$39660.89
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
124196
AMERICAN TELEFHONE 8 TELEGMAPh
$19504.01
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
124197
A T 8 T
$380.04
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
12419R
AkWA/WPCF RESIDUALS MGMT
$29.93
LAB SUPPLIES
124199
ACACEPIC FRESS
$389.51
LAB SUPPLIES
1242I0
AIR COLC SLFFLY INC
$646.50
AIR CONDITIONER SUPPLIES
D
124201
AIR FRCDLCTS & CHEMICAL IN
5169815.00
O&H AGREEMENT OXY GEN SYST M.O.8-9-89
m
124202
RCBCC INC 6/CR APERICAN SEALS
559.22
PUMP PARTS
m
124203
AMERSHAM CCRP
S344080
LAB SUPPLIES
z
d
1242C4
KETEPA INC
$19052.10
MECHANICAL PARTS
�
124205
ANAHEIM SEWER CCNSTRUCTION
529009.85
EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS
124206
ABC LABORATORIES
519630.00
SERVICE AGREEMENT
124.207
ART SUPPLY WHSE
$87.59
ENGINEERING SUPPLIES
rn
124208
DENTAL INSLRANCE CONSULT.
$48.00
DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATOR
3
124209
BRk SAFETY 8 SUPPLY
$19935.30
SAFETY SUPPLIES
12421C
EANANA ELIEFRINT
539393.13
BLUEPRINTING SERVICES
124211
B BATEPAN
5600.00
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
00
124212
BATTERY SPECIALTIES
$185.82
BATTERIES
124213
BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC
5109259.25
LAB SUPPLIES
124214
J & H SERGE INC
5222.85
LAB SUPPLIES
n
124215
PERTECH
5526.06
ELECTRIC PARTS
124216
BCLSA RACIATCR SERVICE
5857.55
TRUCK REPAIRS
124217
BON -A -RUES
$208.88
TRUCK PARTS
C�
124218
DUILDERfS EMPORIUM
5256.11
HARDWARE/LUMBER
'-'
124219
BUSH AAC ASSCCIATES INC
S19580000
SURVEY SERVICES M.O.6-10-92
�
124220
GARY G STP.EEC
559455.92
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
124221
BUTLER PAFER COMPANY
$737.38
OFFICE SUPPLIES
124222
CEPA
ST5.00
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
C7
124223
CH2M HILL
$699000
ENGINEERING SERVICES
---1
124224
SUMMIT SOLLTICNS9 INC
$454.23
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
C/3
124225
CS CCMPANY
$101.77
GAUGE
12422E
CACDVLAK SVSIEPS INC
5193.21
OFFICE SUPPLIES
124227
CAL -GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC.
5720.29
LAB SUPPLIES
124228
CALTROL INC
5109180.50
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
124229
CALIFCRNIA AUTO CCLLISION INC
$19403.94
TRUCK REPAIRS
124230
CENTLRY SAFETY INST 8 SUFV
549662936
SAFETY SUPPLIES
1242!1
Cl- ACPE CFANKSHAFT INC
$570.00
FITTINGS
124232
SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING
539002.99
BUILDING MATERIALS
124233
COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT
559881.78
SAFETY SUPPLIES
1242!4
COLICH AND SONS
5291959291.00
CONSTRUCTION I-9
124235
CCLTCN EQUIPMENT CC
$485977
TRUCK PARTS
1242!6
CCMPITER FPOCICTS PLLS
5166.47
OFFICE SUPPLIES
124237
CCNPLSA9 INC.
$39831.e2
COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE
124238
CONARD'S PHOTOGRAPHY
5269.38
PHOTO SERVICES
t»
N FUND NC 9199 , JT DIST �(RKINC CAF17AL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08/26/92 POSTING DATE 08/26/92
m
3
Zm
00
D
r
r
C=
P--4
Cn
C7
GO
WARRANT NC.
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
124239
CONNELL GM FARTS / DIV
52%744.22
TRUCK PARTS
124240
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST
$59254.95
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
124241
CCNTINENTAL AIR TOCLS INC
S19840.97
TOOLS
124242
CCNTINENTAL CHEMICAL CC
$29155000
CHLORINE M.O.9-9-91
124243
CCNTRACICFIS ECCK STCRE
$19213.50
PUBLICATIONS
124244
CCCPFR INCUSTRIES INC
$378.17
COMPRESSOR PARTS
124245
COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY
5732.65
TRUCK PARTS
124246
CCUNTY LFCLESALE ELECTRIC
5328.29
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
124247
VERNE CCX CC• REAL ESTATE APFR
S79500.00
APPRAISAL SERVICES DIST 6
124248
CHARLES F CRCWLEY CC
$176.59
PUMP PARTS
124249
CROWN FENCE CO
1855.00
FENCING
124250
CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW MAINT.
$29250.00
WINDOW CLEANING
1242F1
ORE INC
1555.07
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
124252
DAMES S MCCRE
S249526.53
ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-3
1242'E3
DANIEL$ TIRE SERVICE
$1.332.58
TIRES
124254
PICHAEL K CASKALAKIS
$69697*50
REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
124255
DE GUELLE S SONS GLASS CO
569.08
GLASS
124256
DELL COMPUTER CORP
5287.80
COMPUTER REPAIRS
1242`7
DEZURIK AND/CR CS CO
$13017.07
VALVE PARTS
1242E8
DTATEC ENVIRONMEN7AL
519936.97
CHEMICALS
1242°9
CICKSCNS
S859984
APPLIANCE
124260
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP
$673.46
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
124261
DUNN EDWARDS CORP
$69012.11
PAINT SUPPLIES
124262
DURO•SENSE CORP
$749.57
MECHANICAL PARTS
124263
E.C.S.
$252.00
PUBLICATION
124264
EIL INSTRUMENTS INC
575.19
INSTRUMENT PARTS
124265
EASTMAN INC
$69534.04
OFFICE SUPPLIES
124266
ECOANALYSIS INC
1961.76
OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91
124267
ELECTRIC EEL MANUFACTURING C
5182.48
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
124268
ENCHANTER INC
$59040000
OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91
1242ES
ENVIPCNETICS• INC
$29396.40
LAB SUPPLIES
124270
EIT
599701.36
INSTRUMENT PARTS
124271
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC
5646.50
LAB SERVICES
124272
EUROTHERM RECCROERS INC
5339.48
INSTRUMENT PARTS
124273
FST SAAC ANC GRAVEL INC
1326.37
ROAD BASE
124274
MARSfALL FAIRRES
578.08
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
124275
FALCCA CISPCSAL SERVICE
$9*080.26
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
124276
JCHN 8 FALKENSTEIN PE
S39400000
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16
124277
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
$267.25
AIR FREIGHT
124278
FIRST COMFANY
$256.45
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124279
FISCI-ER A PCRTER CO
$49177.71
CHLORINATION PARTS
1242FO
FISHER SCIEK7IFIC CC
5371.74
LAB SUPPLIES
124281
FISCNS INSTRUMENTS
$109635.00
SERVICE AGREEMENT
124282
FLO-SYSTEMS
5336.58
PUMP PARTS
124283
FCLSOM LAKE FORD
S169987.44
TRUCK
124284
FCPEOCRCS CCMFANY
5228.97
OFFICE SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199
- JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
Z
COUNTY
SANITATICA DISTRICTS OF CRANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID G8/26/92 POSTING DATE
C8/26/92
WARRANT No.
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
124285
FCUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA
$10.33
FILM
124286
FCLNTATN GALLEY PAINT
$19796.57
PAINT SUPPLIES
124287
FCX INDUSTRIAL SALES
$29261.59
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124288
FREEDOM IMAGING
$123.76
SERVICE AGREEMENT
124289
BUD FREY
521.15
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
1242SO
CITY OF FULLERTCN
S96.91
WATER USE
124291
GPC TRUCK 9 EUS CROUP
$139215.54
TRUCK
D
12425.2
GANAFL LLPBER CC
$10113.4P
BUILDING MATERIALS
m
124293
GARRATT-CALLAFAN COPFANY
$387.90
CHEMICALS
m
124294
GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS
$19600.00
FIBERGLASS PIPE
Z
124295
GENERAL TELEPHCNE CC
S59980.38
TELEPHONE SERVICES
d
124256
GIFRLICF-PITCHELL INC
$29443.77
MECHANICAL PARTS
124297
GLCEAL CCFPUTER SUPPLIES
S358.31
OFFICE SUPPLIES
�-+
124298
GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS
S95.90
CAMERA
rn124299
DCN GREEN & ASSOCIATES
S189959.00
SURVEY SERVICES M.O.6-10-92
3
124300
HACH CCPFANY
S881.45
LAB SUPPLIES
1243C1
FRED A FARFER
S19500.00
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
:;k
1243C2
HARRINGTCN INCUSTRIAL FLAS71
S331.78
FITTINGS
00
124303
HATCH & KIRK INC
$442.00
MECHANICAL PARTS
124304
FL hAWN CO INC
S154.19
FILTERS
1
124305
HILTI INC
$2004.75
ELECTRIC PARTS
3-
1243CE
HI STANCAFC ALTCPCM E
5370.2E
TRUCK REPAIRS
r
124307
HCEFEP SCIENTIFIC INSTR.
$19262.58
LAB SUPPLIES
r
124308
HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC
329107.70
COMPRESSOR PARTS
d
124309
HOKE CONTROLS DIY/HOKE• INC.
S362.21
VALVE
�-+
124310
J.T. HORVATH d ASSOC.
$29100.00
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17
124311
PS HLGFEE CC INC
$19124.31
PAINT SUPPLIES
124312
HUNTINGTCN BEACF RUBBER STA
S74.24
OFFICE SUPPLIES
a-r
124313
HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN C
S129.10
BICYCLE PARTS
C7
124314
IMO INDUSTRIES
$19692.21
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
---j
124315
IRD PECHANALYSIS
S255.08
INSTRUMENT
C/")
124316
THE ICED EANN
$144.80
PUBLICATION
124317
IPFERIAL %EST CHEMICAL
S139004.18
FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-14-90
124318
INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS
$19201.57
CONNECTORS
124319
INSIDE E.P.A.
S137.25
PUBLICATION
124320
INTEPMOLNTAIN SCIENTIFIC CCRP
S70.51
LAB SUPPLIES
124321
INSTPUMENI SPECIALISTS
S39660@00
INSTRUMENT RENTAL
124322
INTEGRATE[ BUSINESS INT• INC
S959114.88
LAB FURNITURE M.0.4-8-92
124323
PACTEL TELETRAC
S25.00
TELEPHONE SERVICES
124324
INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS
S243.41
BATTERIES
124325
IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT
$4.90
WATER USE
124326
GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP
$779.49
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124327
JIPIS SUSFENSICN SERVICE
S30.00
VEHICLE REPAIRS
124328
JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
$748.71
ELECTRIC PARTS
124329
JONES CHEMICALS INC
$6*274.74
CHEMICALS
1243!0
JCNEF INELSTPIAL HARDWARE C
S169.28
TOOL
tz
I
W
bd
FUN(..,j 9199 - JT DIST 4CRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 88/26/92 POSTING DATE 08/26/92
rn
3
4t
00
WARRANT NC.
VEhOCR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
124331
KARS• ADVANCED MATERIALS INC
$49995000
LAB SERVICES
124332
KING BEARING INC
$49803014
MACHINE SUPPLIES
1243!3
KNCX INCLSTRIAL SUFPLIES
$19423.74
TOOLS
124334
LAW OFFICES CF RCEER7 L LAVOIE
S144.01
LEGAL SERVICES - FLORES V. DALEY
124335
LEARN KEY
$54.95
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
124336
LEWCO ELECTRIC CO
S302.92
TRUCK REPAIRS
124337
LIFECCM-SIFE7Y SERVICE SUFPL
$107.75
SAFETY SUPPLIES
124338
SCCC-LYhCF CCRP
S702.72
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124339
MPS
S203.32
PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
124340
MACOMCD
$316.07
SERVICE AGREEMENT
124341
NAG SYSTEPS
$559.02
INSTRUMENT
124342
MAINTENANCE PROCUCTS INC
S396.52
MECHANICAL PARTS
124343
PANCIC PC7CRE
$52.50
TOWING SERVICES
124344
MARVAC ELECTRCNICS
$47.45
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
124345
MATT CHLOR INC
S338.88
CHLORINATION PARTS
124346
DON PAUPER
S29640.00
OCEAN MONITORING
124347
MCBAIII INSTRUMENTS
S2s259.77
INSTRUMENTS
124342
PEASLPEPEr7 VARIABLES
$985.19
INSTRUMENT PARTS
124349
PERICIAN CIAGNCSTICS INC
S273.Q0
LAB SUPPLIES
124350
MES COMPANY
$189826.43
MECHANICAL REPAIRS
124351
MIDWAY PFG 6 MACHINING
$9,890.37
MECHANICAL PARTS
1243!2
PINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CC
S49291.17
SAFETY SUPPLIES
124.4F2
PINNES07A �ESTERh VISUAL FRES.
S437.94
VIDEO SUPPLIES
124354
P.ISSICN AERASIVE SUPPLIES
$260.21
HARDWARE
124355
MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO
$19254.00
ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT
124356
MLAOEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION
S1719252.00
CONSTRUCTION 2-30
124357
NATICKAL SAFETY COLNCIL
$191018
SAFETY FILM RENTAL
1243°8
NATIChAL SANITAPY SLPPLY
$109.04
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124359
NEW ERUN56ICK SCIENTIFIC
S49949.60
LAB SUPPLIES
124360
NEWARK ELECTRONICS
$13.03
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
124361
NCRTHWESTERN CARBON
S89449060
CHEMICALS
1243E2
NOVELL
$425.62
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
1243E3
DX SYSTEPS CC
$519105.82
CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91
124364
OLYPFUS CCRP
$239795.00
INSTRUMENT
124365
ORACLE CORPORATION
$550000
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
124366
ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO
S39979.02
HYDROCHLORIC ACID
1243E7
CRANCE VALVE R FI7TING CC.
$19458.78
FITTINGS
1243EB
CXYGEN SERVICE
$29438.56
SPECIALTY GASES
124369
CSOOC SELF-FUNUED MEDICAL I
S1J09000.00
PREMIUM ADVANCE
124370
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
3831929
REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
1243TI
PC SYSTEMS DESIGN
S909618.57
COMPUTER HARDWARE M.0.6-10-92
124372
PACIFIC FARTS
$29589.73
COMPRESSOR PARTS
124313
PACIFIC SAFE7Y EGUIFPEN7 CC
$792944
SAFETY SUPPLIES
124374
PACIFIC EELL
$274.38
TELEPHONE SERVICES
124375
PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C
$68.40
RENTAL EQUIPMENT
124376
PAK LEST
$130097
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
bd
i
FUND NC 9199
- JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS FAIL 08/26/92
POSTING DATE
08/26/92
WARRANT NC.
VENOCR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
124377
PALMIER], TYLER9 HIENER9
$3#373.00
LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELLS
124378
FARTS LNLIMI7ED
S19296.00
TRUCK PARTS
124379
RCY FENCERGRAFT
$460.10
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
1243E0
FICK►ICK FAPER
S350.45
OFFICE SUPPLIES
124381
PIPA GRC SYSTEMS INC
S1179483.28
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91
124382
PIONEER BANK
$169062.40
CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-34-3
124363
PLASTIC INDUSTRIES
S149.34
PLASTIC BOTTLES
124384
PCLYPUP.E INC
$219046.00
CHEMICALS
G7
124385
PCRETICS CCRP
S607.96
LAB SUPPLIES
�
124386
PCWER ELECTRC SUPPLY CO
$783.62
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
t=7
124387
PREMIUM CONNECTING POINT
S231.66
OFFICE SUPPLIES
n
124388
PREMIER PRINTING CORP.
$431.00
PRINTING
1243P9
HAROLC PRIMRCSF ICE
S308.00
ICE
--�
124390
ThE FACQECT SCLUTIONS CC.
$49968.00
INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91
m
124351
FRC-TECV LAB
$59250.00
PUMP PARTS
3
124392
RMB ENGINEERING/MILLTRONICS
S624.95
INSTRUMENT
124393
STEVE P. RADOS• INC.
S4619686.50
CONSTRUCTION 14-1-lA-2
qk
O0
124394
RATNECW CISPCSAL CC
S19430609
TRASH REMOVAL
124395
RECYC INC
$59*896.57
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91
1
124396
REDI EXPRESS
$40.95
MESSENGER SERVICES
124397
RA REED ELECTRIC
$19282.97
ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
D
r
124358
THE REGISTER
$805.35
NOTICES & ADS
r
124359
MCJUNKIN-PEPUELIC SUFPLY
$79059.79
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
1244CO
RCSEPCUNT ANALYTICAL
S846.78
INSTRUMENT PARTS
124461
ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC
S29U35.67
INSTRUMENT PARTS
Cn
124402
PEGGY RUPP
S540.00
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
124403
RYAN-HERCC
S139589.60
PUMPS
124404
SAFETY-KLEEN CCRP
S29928.54
PARTS CLEANER
n
1244C5
SAND DCLLAR BLSINESS FCRPS
$728.06
PRINTING
124406
SANTA ANA ELECTP.IC MOTORS
S265.46
ELECTRIC PARTS
C/7
124407
SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS
S49993.54
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
124408
SCHERING-FLOUGH
$48.00
SAFETY SUPPLIES
124409
SCNWING AMERICA
$19257.29
ELECTRIC PARTS
124410
SCIENCE lFPLICATIOKS INTOL
S289063.64
OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-12-91
124411
SEA COAST DESIGNS
S1,348.24
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
124412
SHIMPO AMERICA CORP
S95.39
METER
124413
SHURELUCK SALES
S11*075.75
HARDWARE
124414
SIGMA CHEMICAL 'CO
$37.64
LAB SUPPLIES
124415
SILVERI 8 LE BCUEF
$1449561.60
CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3
124416
SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI
S1011.50
PRE -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
124417
SPITH-EPERY CC
S794.00
SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91
124418
SCCTV COAST WATER
S95.00
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
124419
SCUThERN CALIF EDISON CC
S2159652.14
POWER
124420
SO CAL GAS CO
$99322.29
NATURAL GAS
124421
SCUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO
$189404.67
DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL
124422
SCUVENIR FFOTC
S91.87
FILM PROCESSING
Vl
Z
to
i
FUND NC 9199
- JT GIST WCRKINC CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 FAGE 6
`
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID
08/26/92
POSTING DATE
08/26/92
WARRANT NO.
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
124423
SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER
S29615.62
COOLER RENTALS/DRINKING WATER
124424
WESTALLCY INC
$19917.88
WELDING SUPPLIES
124425
SPECIALIZED FROCLC7S CC
S487.31
ELECTRIC PARTS
124426
SPEX INDUSTRIES INC
$19474.37
LAB SUPPLIES
124427
SRECO FLEXIBLE
$130.28
TRUCK PARTS
124428
SUPELCO INC
$19173.54
LAB SUPPLIES
D
124429
SLFER ChEM CCRF
$379.87
CHEMICALS
m
124430
TAYLCP-EUNN MFG COMPANY
$879281.24
ELECTRIC CART PARTS
ITT
124431
OR GEORGE TCHOBANOGLOUS
S972.00
ENGINEERING SERVICES
z
124432
TEKOPAULICS
$219056@51
MECHANICAL PARTS
d
n
124433
37 EOUIPPEN7 CCMPANY
S235.05
FITTINGS
1244.4
TCNY'S L(CK S SAFE SERVICE
S495.48
SECURITY SERVICES
124435
TRAVEL TRAVEL
$724.00
TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-10-92
124436
TRUCK d AUTC SUPPLY INC
$819.75
TRUCK PARTS
3
124437
JG TUCKER 9 SCR INC
$29918.95
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
124438
ULTRA SCIENTIFIC
S838.00
LAB SUPPLIES
t"t
124439
UNOCAL
$76.00
UNLEADED GASOLINE
Cb
1244gO
UNITEC CCNCRETE COMPANIES
$945.54
CONCRETE
124441
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
S340.64
PARCEL SERVICES
124442
UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP
$238.50
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
y
124443
VWR SCIENTIFIC
S39086.75
LAB SUPPLIES
1--
124444
VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO
S19747.92
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
124445
VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL
$19410.59
ENGINE PARTS
d
124446
VANIER BUSINESS FORMS
$587.08
OFFICE SUPPLIES
�-+
224447
VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS
S49517.42
LAB SUPPLIES
C)
124448
VERTEX, SISTEMS
S812.50
COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
124449
VTLLACE NLRSERIES
$864.38
LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
124450
WATER ENVIRCNMENT FED.
$197.45
PUBLICATION
124451
WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY
S50.924.32
CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90
-I
1244F2
WESTINGHCLSE ELECTRIC COPP
S319.80
ELECTRIC PARTS
Cn
1244F3
GILLCAN ISSCCIAIES
S3097.61
ENGINEERING SERVICES
124454
WI TEG SCIENTIFIC
S468.72
LAB SUPPLIES
124455
XEROX CORP
S29052.46
COPIER LEASES
124456
GECRGE YARDLEY CC
$700.83
LAB SUPPLIES
124457
7IEBAPTh AND ALPER
S629194.33
CONSTRUCTION P1-34-1
124458
RICHARD E EDGAR
-----------------
S200.00
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 08/26/92
-----------------
-----------------
S496389553.95
to
I
v
b
G7
m
z
tj
D
►-r
m
3
OO
I
a
r
r
d
00
C7
-I
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08/26/92 POSTING DATE 08/26/92
SUMMARY
#1 CAP FAC FUND
#2 OPER FUND
#2 CAP FAC FUND
#3 OPER FUND
#3 CAP FAC FUND
#5 OPER FUND
#5 CAP FAC FUND
#6 OPER FUND
#7 OPER FUND
#7 CAP FAC FUND
#11 OPER FUND
#14 CAP FAC FUND
#5&6 OPER FUND
#7&14 OPER FUND
JT OPER FUND
CORF
SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND
3-
C
AMOUNT
$46,763.65
$6,381.83
$171,723.28
$27,292.05
$596.28
$4,635.88
$160,624.00
$26.69
$4,275.75
$10,708.45
$677.18
$430,455.85
$3,838.74
$5,430.74
$826,685.01
$2,679,507.83
$101,023.30
$157,907.44
$4,638,553.95
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
\M✓
August 26, 1992
MEMORANDUM
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
(714)962-2411
To: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
From: Katherine Yarosh, Senior Buyer
Re: Purd)ase of Iuiicrocornputer Hardware, Software and
Associated Peripherals, Specification No. E 219
Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, August 25, 199Z for the Purchase of Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated
Peripherals. Tabulation of bids is as follows:
Vendor
Rice
Golden Star Technology, Inc., Cerritos
$ 55,853.00
PC Systems Design, Costa Mesa
$ 56,448.00
MicroAge Computer, Fountain Valley
$ 56,863.00
Super Computer Center, Fountain Valley
$ 59.381.46
MicroAge Computer, Cerritos
$ 61,317.00
Connecting Point Computer Center, Mission Viejo
$ 61,871.00
KIS Computer Center, Irvine
$ 62,081.96
CompuCom Systems, Laguna Hills
$ 62,442.64
Overbyte Computers Corp., Carson
$ 62,643.00
JIT Computer Source, Inc., Carlsbad
$ 64,576.00
Micro Systems Technology, Inc., Mission Viejo $ 68,520.18
The above cost figures represent seventeen (17) different items of various quantities. Bid proposals were received from two other
vendors, who submitted 'no -bid' responses. Analyzing all bids, staff recommends award to Golden Star Technology, Inc. (GST)
Cerritos, the lowest responsible bidder for all items, for a total cost of $55,853.00, plus sales tax.
Respectfully submitted,
Katherine Yarosh
Seni E1
7
r1�
Ted Hoffman,
Purchasing Manager
We hereby concur with the foregoing recommendations:
Steve Hovey, JCw G. Stre ,
Information Services Manager Director of Phahce
licit AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS licit
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 8
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Twelve (12)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9, 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 58,714.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Item 1 - ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL SUPPORT FOR A. C. UNITS
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install two additional 14-inch x
26-inch steel beams, one under Air Conditioner No. 2 and the other under Air
Conditioner No. 3. The actual structural steel layout of specified air
conditioner units was different than shown on the contract drawings. This item
was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the
General Provisions. (Reference: JRR COR 19)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,282.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC (FRP) EXHAUST FANS
The Contractor was directed to return Exhaust Fans EF-1, 7, and 8 specified as
epoxy coated and to upgrade with (FRP) exhaust fans. The upgrade was
recommended to increase longevity of the exhaust fans in this application. This
item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the
General Provisions. (Reference: JRR COR 35R)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
$ 1,218.00
0 Calendar Days
"D-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
Page 2 of 8
C. 0. NO._ Twelve (12)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
Item 3 - DOUBLE STUD WALL AT STAIRS NO. 1 AND 3
The Contractor was directed to provide double studs for radius walls of stairs
No. 1 and No. 3 in order to fill five -inch gap between landing and framing. The
gap was created by a dimensional error between the Structural and Architectural
Drawin s. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b�(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: RFI 159 and 160, JRR COR
36R)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,992.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 - ADDITIONAL ASPHALT PAVING
The Contractor was directed to remove approximately 446 square feet of damaged
asphalt paving and install new asphalt paving immediately adjacent to the
utility excavation through the auto shop parking lot. The previously damaged
asphalt paving was not shown to be replaced on the Contract Drawings. This item
was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the
General Provisions. (Reference: JRR CDR 47)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,469.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 - ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL SUPPORTS FOR ELEVATOR
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install additional structural
supports for the elevator. These were required by the State Elevator Inspector
in order to meet code. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR COR 60R)'
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,500.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
11 .
"D-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 8
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Twelve (12)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
Item 6 - SHEET METAL COVERS FOR A. C. FILTER UNITS
The Contractor was directed to provide sheet metal covers for the four air
conditioner filter units. The covers are necessary to protect against water
leakage through the A.C. platform into the building. The covers were not shown
or called out on the Contract Drawings. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: JRR COR 50)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
Item 7 - RESURVEY CURB
The Contractor was required to recalculate and to
sample drop off turnout. This was due to an error
Contract Drawings. This item was negotiated with
Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
Item 8 - VARIOUS DRYWALL REVISIONS
$ 1,279.00
0 Calendar Days
resurvey the curb for the
in the curve data on the
the Contractor pursuant to
(Reference: JRR COR 72)
$ 956.00
0 Calendar Days
The Contractor was directed to furr walls, columns, and steel posts in Rooms
103, 105, 115, 121, 212, 213, 222, 227, 229, and 231, soffit in Room 115. The
Contractor also provided a stainless steel cap for sill and ceramic tile for
window jambs of Room 118. The furring of walls and columns is required for
casework to line up and to cover vent ducts. The stainless steel cap and
ceramic tile is to extend maintenance. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: JRR COR 71R and 77R. FCO 40)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
$ 13,140.00
7 Calendar Days
Pq
"D-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS
"D-3"
FM
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 8
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Twelve (12)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
Item 9 - MODIFY SITE WORK
The Contractor was directed to construct, pursuant to the revised design, the
loading dock, concrete ramp, six-foot cross gutter, front entry sidewalk,
handicap ramp, and to add handicap ramp, bollard, and wire mesh at rear
sidewalk. Also to remove plaster and install 3/4-inch channel screed at two
locations on the north face of the building, replaster and refog seal the entire
panel. The Contractor was also directed to delete 1,118 linear feet of asphalt
paving, 24 linear feet of curb, and 170 square feet of gutter. The revisions
are required in order to comply with Federal Registar, Americans with
Disabilities Act Title 24, Access to Public Buildings. Deleted items of work to
be completed by others. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant
to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 41, JRR
COR 78R)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,694.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 20 Calendar Days
Item 10 - MODIFY GRAVITY CONVEYORS, DISH SINK, AND HOOD
The Contractor was directed to revise the gravity conveyers, dish sink and hood
in Room 118. This work consisted of notching and rewelding supports, relocating
mounting clips, conveyor modifications, and additional engineering to accomplish
the new layout. The Contractor was also directed to fabricate and install
stainless steel support legs for hood and 316 stainless steel valve handle guide
for dish sink. Revisions were necessary in order for the room to function as
intended. Weight of hood would not allow anchoring into wall only. 30-inch
valve extensions required support. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR
COR 92R)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
$ 6,622.00
14 Calendar Days
"D-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
Page 5 of 8
C. 0. NO. Twelve (12)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
Item 11 - ADDITIONAL LAB CHASES
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install four extra lab chases to
conceal power, telephone, and data conduit to the lab tops from the second floor
ceiling.. The Contract Drawings did not show the lab casework being fed from
below. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR COR 95)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
Item 12 - ADDITIONAL FRAMING AND FIRE RATED DRYWALL
$ 1,548.00
1 Calendar Days
The Contractor was directed to provide additional framing and drywall for fire
rated wall in soffit area above Rooms 234 and 236. This work was necessary as
there was not enough clearance in the soffit to allow for the HVAC ductwork and
maintain the one -hour fire rating required for the corridor. This item was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General
Provisions. (Reference: JRR COR 98)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
Item 13 - VELOCITY STACKS FOR EXHAUST FANS
$ 1,074.00
3 Calendar Days
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install five additional velocity
stacks for Exhaust Fans EF-3, 5, 6, 8, and 13. The stacks were not installed
due to a conflict in the Contract Drawings. The HVAC system could not be
balanced without the installation of these stacks. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: JRR CDR 99)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
$ 1,617.00
7 Calendar Days
"D=5" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS
"D-5"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 8
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO._ Twelve (12)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
Item 14 - UPGRADE EXHAUST FAN
The Contractor was directed to provide an upgraded exhaust fan for EF-9. The
system requires a specialized unit be made to exhaust combustible fumes. The
specified fan is no longer available, so the cost involved with this item is for
the next available upgrade. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference:
JRR COR 101R)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,905.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 15 - MODIFY EXHAUST AIR SYSTEMS
The Contractor was directed to add OBD damper, louver, galvanized duct, and
eyebrow to Exhaust Fans EF-3, EF-4, and EF-5 on the upstream side of the
filters. This was recommended by the consultant as the most economical means to
achieve the static pressures in the systems due to the changes in exhaust air
conditions for Plan Change No. 10. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference:
FCO No. 51)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER:
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER:
11�
$ 7,418.00
20 Calendar Days
$ 58,714.00
72 Calendar Days
"D-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-6"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 7 of 8
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Twelve (12)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE _ September 9. 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 72 days extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no
direct or indirect, incidential consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages
have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and
approved by this Change Order.
W"
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date March 1, 1990
Original Contract Time 420 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date April 24, 1991
Time Extension this C.O. 72 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 386 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 806 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date May 14, 1992
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price
$
7,090,000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes
$
952,925.55
This Change (Add) (Ded--ct)
$
58,714.00
Amended Contract Price
$
8,101,639.59
"D-7" AGENDA ITEM #9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-7"
i
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 8 of 8
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Twelve (12)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
Board Authorization Date: September 9, 1992
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SUBMITTED BY:
�ngineer Date
RECOMMENDED BY:
�& P. -�—� CF-ld- Yi
C nstruction Manager Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
P/yam
Director of Engineering ate General Counsel Date
J. R. ROBERTS CORPORATION
ACCEPTE BY:
Contractor to
"D-8" AGENDA ITEM #9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-8"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 46,279.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby
approved.
Item 1 - CONDUIT AND WIRING FOR EMERGENCY LIGHT FIXTURES
This item is for providing conduit, wiring, and junction boxes to provide power
for the emergency light fixtures in the Central Power Generation Building.
These light fixtures were omitted in the contract documents. Emergency battery
packs for type B fixtures are included in this item. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)l of the General Provisions.
(Reference: J191-040)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 18,550.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - POWER, CONTROL, SIGNAL RACEWAY, AND CABLE FOR ENGINE CONTROLS
This item is for providing conduit, supports, wiring, wire terminations and
additional testing required to provide power and controls to the owner -supplied
engine controls. The contract documents did not provide the correct number of
circuits required to operate the control features provided with the engine
controls. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b)l of the General Provisions. (Reference: J191-031)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 18,191.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 3 - ELEVATOR SHAFT REVISIONS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE
This item is for providing a ladder, receptacle, junction box, light fixture,
switch and associated conduit and wiring in the elevator shaft to comply with
state elevator code requirements. These items were not provided for in the
contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)l of the General Provisions. (Reference: J191-043)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
$ 4,014.00
0 Calendar Days
"E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1"
LIM
pin
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
Page 2 of 4
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1
Item 4 - ENGINE STATUS PANEL COMPONENTS AND CABLE
This item is for adding push -buttons, indicating lights, and terminal boards to
the engine status panel shown on contract drawings 2E27 and 2E44. These changes
to the panel are required for compatibility between the owner -supplied equipment
and contractor -furnished control panel. These panel components were not
required in the contract documents. This item includes credit for deleting
control raceway and cable between the status panel and the uninterruptible power
supply that is no longer required. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)l of the General Provisions. (Reference: J191-044)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,921.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 - GLASS BLOCK MODIFICATIONS
This item is for providing lintels and flashing at the second floor level for
glass block windows and revising wall openings for glass block at the front door
in the Central Power Building. Contract drawings require glass block windows
that are thirty-two feet in height which exceeds the allowable unsupported
height allowed by the building code. This item includes support angles and
weather flashing at the second floor level for three high windows on the north
side of the building. This item also includes widening of the wall opening on
both sides of the front door to include space for the glass block expansion
joints. Contract drawings show a 16-inch opening on both sides of the door.
Sixteen and one half inches are required to install the glass block and
expansion joints. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)l of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER:
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER:
$ 3,603.00
0 Calendar Days
$ 46,279.00
0 Calendar Days
"E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4 _
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date February 21, 1991
Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date October 12, 1992
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 103 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 703 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date January 23, 1993
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price
$
15,410,855.00
Prev. Auth. Chan es
$
468,405.00
This Change (Add (Deduct)
$
46,279.00
Amended Contract Price
$
15,925,539.00i
"E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
"aw, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1
Board Authorization Date: September 9, 1992
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SUBMITTED BY:
4a - It:= 84-17-
Engineer Date
APPROVED BY:
v
Director of Engineering Date
HUNTER CORPORATION
ACCEPTED BY:
'111.�0!, sm.42
Contractor Date
RECOMMENDED BY:
Construction Manager Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Gene 1 Counsel Date
"E-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS
"E-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE September 9. 1992
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB:
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Daduct) $ 15,957.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
fo 11lowing additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby
approved.
Job No. P1-34-3
Item 1 - LPDG PIPING MODIFICATION
The Contractor was directed to reroute the low pressure digester gas piping
(LPDG) on the east wall of Control Building 11-14 when conflicts were
discovered. The 20-inch ductile iron piping, as shown on the contract drawings,
interferes with an HVAC exhaust fan at the same elevation. The most cost
effective solution was to reroute the piping over the exhaust fan. The work was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General
Provisions. (Reference: FCO-052)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,105.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - GAS PIPE SUPPORT CHANGE
The pipe support detail shown on the contract drawings for the LPDG piping on
the roof of the Control Buildings indicates a flush mounted pipe. The piping,
however, must be supported in order to clear the 12-inch parapet curb and also
to maintain a slope down to the drip traps. Since the parapet was incorporated
in the roofing membrane system, it was decided to direct the Contractor to
change the specified support detail to a concrete saddle type with a galvanized
retainer strap in order to support the piping at the correct elevation and
provide seismic restraint. The work was negotiated with the Contractor ursuant
to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO-53�
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER:
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER:
$ 9,852.00
0 Calendar Days
$ 15,957.00
0 Calendar Days
"F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1"
11-1�
\111�
1..d
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE September 9, 1992
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1,
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work within the time allotted for the original Contract
and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued
Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time extension is
required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred
by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF MILESTONE TIME
Job No. P1-35-2
Original Contract Date January 28, 1991
Original Milestone Time 365 Calendar Days
Original Milestone Completion Date January 27, 1992
Milestone Modification This Change Order 0 Calendar Days
Total Milestone Modification 28 Calendar Days
Revised Milestone Time 393 Calendar Days
Revised Milestone Date February 24, 1992
Job No. J-21
Original Contract Date January 28, 1991
Original Milestone Time 180 Calendar Days
Original Milestone Completion Date July 26, 1991
Milestone Modification This Change Order 0 Calendar Days
Total Milestone Modification 25 Calendar Days
Revised Milestone Time 205 Calendar Days
Revised Milestone Date August 20, 1991
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Job No. P1-34-3
Original Contract Date January 28, 1991
Original Contract Time 900 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date July 15, 1993
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 27 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 927 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date August 11, 1993
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
"F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE September 9. 1992
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB:
Original Contract Price
$
27,205,378.00
Prev. Auth. Chan es
$
616,358.54
This Change (Add (Deduct)
$
15,957.00
Amended Contract Price
$
27,837,693.54
Board Authorization Date: September 9, 1992
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SUBMITTED BY:
Engineer D to
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDED BY:
kr- Z—.f,-, rL
nstruction Manager Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ka
r �` Wes/ f// 9;
a_zmp�F 2/All
Director of Engineering ate General Cou sel Dat
ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, DIVISION OF
ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
ACCEPTED BY:
vj�j'
Contractor Date
"F-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Five (5)
CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper DATE September 9. 1992
Construction Co.
JOB: Electrification of Puma Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-1
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 17,689.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby
approved.
Item 1 - DISCONNECT AND RECONNECT MOTOR
\"J The Contractor removed the existing No. 2 engine and replaced it with an elec-
tric motor that drives a pump in the Plant Water Pump Station pursuant to the
contract. After assembly was complete, a problem was noted within the pump
causing the pump to be removed, rebuilt, and replaced by the Districts mainte-
nance forces. The Contractor was directed to disconnect and reconnect the elec-
tric motor previously installed on a time and material basis in accordance with
General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)(B). (Reference: PCH No. 024)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,840.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - FILTER CONTROL POWER
After installation was complete, it was later determined that the Ocean Outfall
Booster Station Harmonic Filter Control Power from Panel "AL" should be
connected to Panel "BL" for Pumps Nos. 3, 4, and 5. In case of a power failure
on Panel "AL", the facility would lose all filter control to all pumps.
Therefore, the Contractor was instructed to disconnect and reconnect the control
power on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section
10-6(b)(2)(B). (Reference: PCH No. 026).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 411.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "G'-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Five (5)
CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper DATE September 9. 1992
Construction Co.
JOB: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-1
Item 3 - PRESSURE SWITCHES
Problems were experienced with the pressure switches that regulate the flow for
the seal water of the ten new pumps installed in Headworks B and C. The
pressure switches initially specified did not work properly due to the dirty
plant water. The Contractor was instructed to replace the ten switches with a
better design that was more suitable to the dirty water conditions at a firm
price in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)(A). (Reference:
John Carollo Engineers' letter dated April 15, 1992 and PCH No. 027)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,875.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 - LUBRICATING OIL CONTROLLERS
The contract drawings did not provide lubricating oil controllers for the shafts
of the three new electric motors installed at the Primary Effluent Pumping
Station. The Contractor was instructed to install the Districts -furnished
relays and the necessary conduit and wiring on a force account basis in
accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)(B). (Reference: PCH No.
030)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,422.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 - REMOVE CONCRETE PADS
The contract drawings did not provide for the
concrete pads that supported the two engines,
in the Primary Effluent Pumping Station. Thes
operating floor presented an obstruction to th
new electric motors that replaced the engines.
provide labor and equipment on a force account
Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)(B). (Reference:
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:
removal of the existing reinforced
lube oil, and heat recovery units
e concrete pads sticking above the
e operation and maintenance of the
The Contractor was instructed to
basis in accordance with General
PCH No. 031)
$ 8,252.00
0 Calendar Days
"G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Five (5)
CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper DATE September 9. 1992
Construction Co.
JOB: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-1
Item 6 - MODIFY LIGHTING FIXTURES
The contract drawings specified 21 120 volt lighting fixtures for Headworks C
when in fact there is 480 volt power existing. The Contractor had already
purchased and received the lighting fixtures when the error was discovered. The
Contractor returned the lighting fixtures ballast housings to the manufacturer
but was assessed a handling and restocking fee. Work was performed on a force
account in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)(B).
(Reference: PCH No. 032)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 889.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
�J TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 17,689.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Completion Date
Time Extension this C.O.
Total Contract Time Extension
Revised Contract Time
Revised Final Completion Due Date
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages
Actual Final Completion Date
AGENDA ITEM #9(f) -
March 12, 1991
480 Calendar Days
July 3, 1992
0 Calendar Days
0 Calendar Days
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
ALL DISTRICTS
"G-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 4
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Five (5)
CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper DATE September 9, 1992
Construction Co.
JOB: Electrification of Puma Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1
Original Contract Price
$
9,369,000.00
Prev. Auth. Chan es
$
98,721.00
This Change (Add (Deduct)
$
17,689.00
Amended Contract Price
$
9,485,410.00
Board Authorization Date: September 9, 1992
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SUBMITTED BY:
PO
Z.
ngineer Date
APPROVED BY•
irector of gineering Date
ZIEBARTH & ALPER AND C. S. ALPER
CONSTRUCTION CO.
ACCEPTED BY:
/a- 9;2-
tractor Date
RECOMMENDED BY:
P ` � -13- iL
C struction Manager Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Gerferif Counsel Date
"G-4 AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS
"G-4"
RESOLUTION NO. 92-126
AWARDING JOB NO. J-28
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING
CONTRACT PUMP STATION TELEMETRY AND MONITORING SYSTEM,
JOB NO. J-28
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which
is a portion of the previously -approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal
Facilities Master Plan. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan
approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, the Program
Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan covering these projects was approved by the Boards of Directors on
July 19, 1989; and,
Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the
Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of
contract be made to Domar Electric, Inc., for Pump Station Telemetry and
Monitoring System, Job No. J-28, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for
said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That the contract for Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring
System, Job No. J-28, be awarded to Domar Electric, Inc., in the total amount of
$374,100.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained
therein; and,
fir`
"H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(g)(5) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-l"
Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor
for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor,
in form approved by the General Counsel; and,
Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 9, 1992.
"H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(g)(5) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
\...✓
August 4, 1992
11:00 a.m.
4 ADDENDA
BID TABULATION
SHEET
JOB NO. J-28
10844 ELLI5 AVENUE
P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
(714) 962-2411
PROJECT TITLE Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Replacement of Existing Pump Station Telemetry with
Computerized Monitoring Systems
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 400,000.00 BUDGET AMOUNT $ 702,000.00
------ CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. Domar Electric Inc., Lake Elsinore, CA $374,100.00
2. Canus Corporation, Laguna Hills, CA $416,289.79*
3. Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc., El Segundo, CA $583,588.00
4. HSQ Technology, South San Francisco, CA $607,500.00
5. ATSI, Escondido, CA No Bid
*Addition error --corrected total.
I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the
low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Domar Electric
in the bid amount of $374,100.00 as the lowest and best bid.
n
Thomas M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
"H-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(g)(5) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3"
RESOLUTION NO. 92-127
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING
CORPORATION FOR PREPARATION OF WASTEWATER
QUALITY, DIVERSION AND TREATMENT STUDY
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR PREPARATION OF
WASTEWATER QUALITY, DIVERSION AND TREATMENT STUDY,
PROVIDING FOR A REALLOCATION OF THE COSTS AMONG
CATEGORIES
WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with
Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of Wastewater Quality, Diversion
and Treatment Study; and,
WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend said agreement with Boyle
Engineering Corporation to provide for reallocation of the costs among
categories within said agreement, with no change in the total maximum authorized
compensation.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated September 9, 1992, to that certain
Professional Services Agreement dated July 17, 1991, by and between County
Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2,
3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of
Wastewater Quality, Diversion and Treatment Study, providing for a reallocation
of the costs among categories within said agreement with no change in the total
maximum authorized compensation (not to exceed $88,.055.00), is hereby approved
"I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1"
and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
� itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the
General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 9, 1992.
'law/
11I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 92-128-2
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH RICHARD JOSEPH BATTAGLIA,
. 2-9-R1
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH RICHARD JOSEPH BATTAGLIA,
TRUSTEE OF THE RICHARD BATTAGLIA TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 27,
1986, PROVIDING FOR GRANTING OF NEW EASEMENTS TO DISTRICT
AND QUITCLAIMING OF OLD EASEMENT BY DISTRICT, NECESSARY
FOR REHABILITATION OF CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER,
CONTRACT NO. 2-9-R1
*******************
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section.1. That the certain Agreement dated September 9, 1992, by and
between County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County and Richard Joseph
Battaglia, Trustee of the Richard Joseph Battaglia Trust dated February 27,
1986, relative to District's receipt of new easements required in connection
with relocation of a portion of Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer,
Contract No. 2-9-R1, in exchange for a quitclaim deed quitclaiming the
District's old easement granted prior to construction to said Trust, is hereby
approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the certain Corporation Quitclaim Deed dated ,
wherein County Sanitation District No. 2 quitclaims to Richard Joseph Battaglia,
Trustee of the Richard Joseph Battaglia Trust the District's prior access
easement, is hereby approved and authorized; and,
Section 3. That the real property to be quitclaimed is more particularly
described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of
this resolution; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 2 are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Agreement and Corporation Quitclaim Deed
in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 9, 1992.
"J" AGENDA ITEM #9(i) - DISTRICT 2
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION
Date: July 29, 1992
TO: Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 14
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
I (We), the undersigned landowner(s), do hereby request that proceedings be
taken to annex 54.52 acres (Gross - to nearest hundredth) of territory to
the District located in the vicinity of north of San Joaquin Hills Road and west
of Newport Coast Drive r
(Indicate adjacent street intersection or area description)
in the city of unincorporated territory , more particularly
(Indicate city or unincorporated territory)
described and shown on the LEGAL DESCRIPTION and MAP enclosed herewith which
has been prepared in accordance with the District's annexation procedures. The
street address of the property is:
none
The reason for the proposed annexation is: to provide sewer service
Said property is Inhabited / XX Uninhabited. Number of registered voters,
if any: • 0 The assessed value of the property is: $ 2,217,182.00
Also enclosed are the JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL QUESTIONNAIRE required by the
�.,.� Local Agency Formation Commission (and an Environmental Impact Report, if
appropriate) and a check in the amount of $500.00 representing payment of the
DISTRICT PROCESSING FEE.
Notices and ccaTmmications relative to this proposal for annexation should be
sent to the following:
Tom Dawes Paul D. Jones II
C.S.D.O.C. The Irvine Company
10844 Ellis Avenue 550 Newport Center Drive
Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8904
Tele:(714) 962-2411 ext. 5000 Tele:(714) 720-2449
SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF IANDOWNER
'-TWF IAVJvP- 6MP y 550 Newport Center Drive
407�1 2- Newport Beach, CA 92658-2449
- MICHAU C. ELLIS
co YICE }PRE IDEMr
D b
MES R. GAvANAU H
`.5t1ZT r4, 99CWTA"
550 Newport Center Drive
TPPp'po� Newport Beach, CA 92658-2449
11V AGENDA IT (j) - DISTRICT 14
„V
RESOLUTION NO. 92-129-14
AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND
FILING -OF APPLICATION TO LAFCO RE ANNEXATION /
OF TERRITORY TO DISTRI T N0. 14 ANNEXATION
NO. 1 - SAN JOAQUIN HILLS ROAD ANNEXATION
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND REQUESTING
THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT OF TERRITORY KNOWN AS
ANNEXATION NO. 1 - SAN JOAQUIN HILLS ROAD ANNEXATION TO
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That proceedings are hereby authorized to be initiated by
District No. 14, and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County is
hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of territory designated
as "Annexation No. 1 - San Joaquin Hills Road Annexation to County Sanitation
District No. 1411, the boundaries of which are more particularly described and
delineated on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part
of this resolution, according to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth
in this resolution in the manner provided by the Cortese -Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985; and,
Section 2. That this proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese -Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000
of the California Government Code; and,
Section 3. That this application is for the purpose of annexing
approximately 54.52 acres of territory to District No. 14 in the vicinity of San
Joaquin Hills Road and Newport Coast Drive in unincorporated County territory,
to provide sanitary sewer service to said territory, which said service is not
now provided by any public agency, as requested by The Irvine Company, owners of
"L-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(j) - DISTRICT 14 11-1"
said property; and,
Section 4. That the territory to be annexed is inhabited; and,
Section 5. That this proposal is consistent with the adopted sphere of
influence of the affected District; and,
Section 6. That proposed Annexation No. 1 - San Joaquin Hills Road
Annexation to County Sanitation Districts No. 14 shall be subject to the
condition that all fees required to be paid to the District must be satisfied
prior to completion of the annexation proceedings; and,
Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99.1 of
the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation
exchange with other affected taxing agencies.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 9, 1992.
` 110/
"L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9 0) - DISTRICT 14 "L-2"
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. ESTABLISHING
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES AND REPEALING
ORDINANCE NO.
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange
County, California, does hereby FIND:
A. That a Comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities entitled
"Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan - 1989," hereinafter
the "Master Plan," which includes detailed financial and engineering reports,
has been prepared, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors setting forth
and identifying the required future development of District and jointly -owned
facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to
all properties within the District service area; and,
B. That the financial and engineering reports of the Master Plan have been
made available to the public and have been subject to noticed public hearings,
all in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 66016 and other
provisions of law; and,
C. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will
be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and
operation of the sewage collection facilities, wastewater treatment and disposal
facilities of the District; the repay principal and interest on debt instruments
or to repay federal and state loans issued for the construction and
reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of
administration and provisions for necessary reserves; and,
"M-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 "M-1"
' D. That the properties upon which the fees established by this Ordinance
are levied, discharge wastewater to the District's collection, treatment and
disposal facilities. The costs of operating and maintaining said facilities
have constantly increased due in part to increased regulatory requirements to
upgrade the treatment process; and,
E. That the need for upgraded and improved treatment of all wastewater
collection, treatment and disposal facilities is required to protect the public
health and safety to preserve the environment without damage; and,
F. That the new fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed the
estimated amount required to provide the sewer service for which the fee is
levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 66013 and 66016; and,
G. That the change in rate structure will not necessarily result in an
expansion of facilities to provide for growth outside the existing service area.
The adoption of these rates will not result in any specific project nor result
in a direct physical change in the environment; and,
`..W/ H. That the District has, on July 19, 1989, adopted a Final Program
Environmental Impact Report in accordance with legally required notices and
public hearing, related to the Master Plan, including the financial program;
and,
I. That the proposed increases in the sewer service charges are
established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each customer and the
service and facilities provided to each customer to the District, a portion of
which are necessary to replace the loss of ad valorem property taxes which have
been diverted from the District to the State General Fund as a result of state
legislative action on September 2, 1992; and,
"M-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 "M-2"
L1
J. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the
California Environmental Quality Act from further environmental assessment
pursuant to the provisions of California Public Resources Code
Section 21080(b)(8) and California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a).
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.
of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN:
Section 1: Section 1 of Ordinance No. is hereby amended to read:
"Section 1: Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the
established system of sanitary sewer service charges required to be
paid by property owners for the services and facilities furnished by
the District in connection with its sanitation treatment works and
sewage collection system.
Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used
for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and -
operation of the sewage collection facilities, wastewater treatment and
disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on
debt instruments or to repay federal and state loans issued for the
construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together
with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves."
Section 2: Section 2 of Ordinance No. is hereby amended to read:
"Section 2: Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge. Commencing
October 15, 1992, each parcel of real property located within the
District which is improved with structures designed for residential,
commercial or industrial use and connected to the District's system,
"M-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 "M-3"
shall pay a sanitary sewer service charge based on the average volume
of wastewater discharged by a class of users in the sum or sums as set
forth in Table A of this Ordinance."
Section 3: If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to
any person or entity is held invalid by order of court, the remainder of the
Ordinance or the application of such provision to other persons or entities
shall not be affected.
Section 4: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective
October 16, 1992.
Section 5: Ordinance No. _ is hereby repealed.
Section 6: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general
circulation in the District, as required by law.
ON
"M-4" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 "M-4"
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of greater than two-thirds of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County,
California, at an adjourned regular meeting held September 16, 1992.
Chairman of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No.
of Orange County, California
ATTEST: l l
Assistant Secretary of the Board of
Director, County Sanitation District
No. of Orange County, California
"M-5" AGENDA ITEM #11(C) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 "M-5"
4-Sep-92
ABLE A
1992-93 USER FEE ADJUSTMENTS*
Required to Replace 35%
Property Tax Shift Ordered
By the Governor and State Legislature
Pro -Rate Pro -Rate
(7/1-10/15/92) (10/16-6/30/93) Total
Old New Current Proposed Revised
District Ordinance" Ordinance 1992-93`• 1992-93 1992-93
Sinale Family Residence
1
118
121
$21.88
$62.88
$84.76
2
213
216
17.50
54.58
72.08
3
316
319
17.50
57.04
74.54
5
525
528
21.88
90.27
112.15
6
619
622
18.96
58.03
76.99
7
N/A
729
11.67
43.96
55.63
11
1115
1118
17.50
60.73
78.23
Multi-Familv Residen
1
118
121
$13.13
$37.73
$50.86 /unit
2
213
216
10.50
32.75
43.25 /unit
`,/ 3
316
319
10.50
34.22
44.72 /unit
5
525
528
13.13
54.16
67.29 /unit
6
619
622
11.38
34.82
46.20 /unit
7
N/A
729
7.00
26.37
33.37 /unit
11
1115
1118
10.50
36.44
46.94 /unit
Commercial/Industrial/Governmental/Other
1 118
121
$15.65
$44.97
$60.62 /1,000 SF
2 213
216
12.51
39.03
51.54 /1,000 SF
3 316
319
12.51
40.78
53.29 /1,000 SF
5 525
528
15.65
64.55
80.20 /1,000 SF
6 619
622
13.56
41.49
55.05 /1,000 SF
7 N/A
729
8.34
31.43
39.77 /1,000 SF
11 1115
1118
12.51
43.42
55.93 /1,000 SF
*The final user fee amount established for each District shall not exceed the proposed
amounts set forth herein. If during the course of the public hearing additional facts are
developed to support the adoption of lesser fees than proposed, such fees may be
adopted without further notice and hearing.
used on fees established by these ordinances.
"M-6Q AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7&11 "M-6"
COUNTY SANITATION
s%wo, DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14
In
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 12, 1992
P�t'TATION
'tan
��tS
Sill
Sacs 19gA
\NEE col/
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10544 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 69 79 119 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on August 12, 1992, at
7:30 p.m., 1n the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance
and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS
ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1:
Dan Griset, Chairman
x Robert Richardson
'x-Fred
Barrera, Chairman pro tem
Gene Beyer
Thomas R. Saltarelli
x Leslie A. Pontious
Roger Stanton
x Don R. Roth
James A. Wahner
x Nate Reade
DISTRICT NO. 2: x
Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman
John M. Gullixson
'x-John
Collins, Chairman pro tem
George Scott
x
Fred Barrera
Gene Beyer
x
Buck Catlin
Chris Norby
a
Barry Denes
Bob Bell
x
William D. Mahoney
James H. Flora
x
Robert H. Main
Norman Culver
x
Carrey J. Nelson
Glenn Parker
a
Arthur G. Newton
John 0. Tynes
x
Iry Pickler
Fred Hunter
x
Miguel Pulido
Dan Griset
Roger Stanton
x Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 3:
DISTRICT NO. 5:
DISTRICT NO. 6:
x Sal A. Sapien,
x Burnie Dunlap,
x Buck Catlin
x John Collins
x Norman Culver
x James V. Evans
x James H. Flora
a Don R. Griffin
x Frank Laszlo
x Pat McGuigan
-x-Eva G. Miner
x Richard Partin
x Iry Pickler
x Jim Silva
Roger Stanton
x Charles Sylvia
Chairman
Chairman pro tem
a Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman
x Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tem
x Don R. Roth
James A. Wahner, Chairman
a Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tem
x Don R. Roth
Harry M. Dotson
Carrey J. Nelson
Chris Norby
George Scott
Robert H. Main
Margie L. Rice
William D. Mahoney
Rhonda J. McCune
Gwen A. Forsythe
Robert Richardson
Larry Herman
Cecilia L. Age
Fred Hunter
Earle Robitaille
x Don R. Roth
Ronald Bates
Evelyn Hart
John C. Cox, Jr.
Roger Stanton
x Dick Sherrick
Ruthelyn Plummer
Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7:
x
Charles E. Puckett, Chairman
Thomas R. Saltarelli
James A. Wahner, Chairman pro tem
x Nate Reade
x
Fred Barrera
Gene Beyer
x
John C. Cox, Jr.
Ruthelyn Plummer
x
Robert Richardson
Miguel Pulido
x
Don R. Roth
Roger Stanton
a
Sally Anne Sheridan
Barry Hammond
DISTRICT NO. 11:
x
Grace Winchell, Chairman
Linda Moulton -Patterson
x
Jack Kelly, Chairman pro tem
Don MacAllister
1
Roger Stanton
x Don R. Roth
-DISTRICT NO. 13:
John M. Gullixson, Chairman
x Henry W. Wedaa
7-Fred
Barrera, Chairman pro tem
Gene Beyer
-a-William
D. Ehrle
Fred Hunter
x
Glenn Parker
Burnie Dunlap
x
Don R. Roth
Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 14:
x
Peer A. Swan, Chairman
Darryl Miller
x
Leslie A. Pontious, Chairman pro tem
Charles E. Puckett
x
Fred Barrera
=Gene Beyer
x
Don R. Roth
Roger Stanton
a
Sally Anne Sheridan
Barry Hammond
-2-
08/12/92
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes,
Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant
Board Secretary, Susan Bradford,
Corrine Clawson, Mark Esquer, Gary
Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, Steve Hovey,
John Linder, Margie Nellor, Bob Ooten,
Mary Simpson, Jack Vincent, Chuck
Winsor
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel,
Pervaiz Anwar, Jamel Demir, Mary Lee,
Royal S. Radtke, Fred Soronshean,
Richard von Langen
DISTRICT 6 In the absence of Chairman James A.
Appointment of Chairman pro tem Wahner and Chairman pro tem Evelyn
Hart, Director Don R. Roth was
appointed Chairman pro tem of District No. 6.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file minute excerpt_
re Board Appointments That the minute excerpt from the Costa
Mesa Sanitary District re appointment
of alternate Director for the August 12, 1992 meeting only, be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows:
District Active Director Alternate Director
1 James A. Wahner Nate Reade
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman welcomed alternate
Presentation of District pins to Directors Nate Reade and Dick
Directors Sherrick, who were representing the
Costa Mesa Sanitary District at this
meeting. He then presented pins bearing the Districts' logo to these
Directors. The pins are similar to the service pins given to employees and
recognize the Directors for their service on the Board of the Sanitation
Districts.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized
Recognition of persons who wish to Mr. Royal S. Radtke, President of the
be heard on matters of general Corona del Mar Chamber of Commerce,
interest who addressed the Boards regarding a
District 5 sewer project in Pacific
Coast Highway through the community of Corona del Mar.
Mr. Radtke complimented the Districts for a fine job and keeping the
community together and help the merchants survive during the project. He
gave special thanks to Charles Gabbard, Project Inspector, Tom Dawes,
Director of Engineering and Director Phil Sansone, Mayor of Newport Beach.
Mr. Radtke also commended the Districts for the Memorandum of Understanding
that did not allow sewer construction to start in Corona del Mar until
Pelican Hill Road, which is now Newport Coast Drive, was in place, which
allowed many cars to be diverted from PCH to Newport Coast Drive.
-3-
08/12/92
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported on the
Report of the General Manager State budget stalemate still going on
in Sacramento. He stated that last
month he advised the Directors that the proposal to shift special districts
property taxes to the school districts was off the table. Mr. Sylvester
noted, however, that it is now back on the table and that the Districts will
be affected in some way, between 25% and 100%.
He observed that currently there are two proposals on the table that would
affect the Districts. The "Super Pot" proposal would put the tax revenue
from all special districts in the state in one pot, which totals between
$1.6-$1.7 billion. Of that amount, 25% would be appropriated for the
schools. The balance would be put into a separate fund and distributed in
the same manner as special district augmentation funds are currently
distributed in each county.
The alternative proposal would take 25-30% off the top of enterprise special
districts' tax revenue and appropriate it to the schools. For the
Sanitation Districts, 25% of our $35 million in property taxes would be just
under $9 million that would be shifted to the schools.
The General Manager stated that once the budget is passed, its impact on the
Districts will require the Boards to meet immediately to consider
alternatives including adjusting the user fees to make up for the shortfall.
He stated user fees are collected on the property tax bills, and the
Districts provide information to the County Auditor for each parcel that the
fee is levied against within the Districts' service area. The deadline
date, August 10, had been extended to August 24, so timing is of the essence
�..✓ because the Boards will have to act quickly.
Following discussion among the Directors regarding the impact of the State's
budget proposals on the Districts and alternatives for addressing them, it
was determined that the Boards would adjourn this meeting to August 19th,
and the Board Secretary could continue adjourning to specific dates until
such time as the budget is finally passed and the Directors could then meet
to consider appropriate actions.
Mr. Sylvester then reported that under the Districts' NPDES permit
conditions, the US EPA and Regional Water Quality Control Board require the
Districts to submit an annual report of the Districts' activities. He
stated that the Executive Summary to the 1991 annual report was recently
mailed to the Directors, and he urged the Directors to review it. He also
stated additional copies were available upon request.
The General Manager then reported that as part of the public outreach
program, the Districts participated again this year in the Orange County
Fair. One of our exhibits included an interactive computer system where
people could take a quiz and, if questions answered correctly, they would
receive various prizes. This turned out to be one of the high spots of the
fair. He commented that the Districts' participation was successful and
that we were able to educate a considerable number of people on our
wastewater management program.
-4-
08/12/92
DISTRICT 1
Approval of Minutes
the Chairman ordered that said minutes
DISTRICT 2
Approval of Minutes
the Chairman ordered that said minutes
DISTRICT 3
Approval of Minutes
the Chairman ordered that said minutes
There being no corrections or
amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held July 8, 1992,
be deemed approved, as mailed.
There being no corrections or
amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held July 8, 1992,
be deemed approved, as mailed.
There being no corrections or
amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held July 8, 1992,
be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held July 8, 1992,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held July 8, 1992,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held July 8, 1992,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held July 8, 1992,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13
Approval of Minutes
the Chairman ordered that said minutes
DISTRICT 14
Approval of Minutes
the Chairman ordered that said minutes
There being no corrections or
amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held July 8, 1992,
be deemed approved, as mailed.
There being no corrections or
amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held July 8, 1992,
be deemed approved, as mailed.
4
-5-
08/12/92
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint
and Individual District Claims That payment o
"A" and "B" attached hereto
below, be, and are hereby,
so indicated.
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund
Joint Working Capital Fund
Self -Funded Insurance Funds
DISTRICT NO. 1
DISTRICT NO. 2
DISTRICT NO. 3
DISTRICT NO. 5
DISTRICT NO. 6
DISTRICT NO. 7
DISTRICT NO. 11
DISTRICT NO. 13
DISTRICT NO. 14
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT
District claims
and made a part of these
ratified by the respectiv
7/01/92
- $1,114,606.29
- 2,392,924.95
- 176,468.67
- 153,223.35
- 109,781.02
- 5,866.42
- 168,549.26
- 185,160.12
- 417.96
- 52,940.28
- 926.99
-0-
- 954,131.81
- 1,124.69
- 2,263.66
5,541.13
5,323,926.60
ALL DISTRICTS
Awarding Purchase of Traffic
Control Devices, Signholders, Signs
and Accessories, Specification
No. E-216, to J. G. Tucker & Son,
Inc.
received and ordered filed; and,
f
7/15/92
$ 754,027.41
2,737,571.94
172,757.07
57,420.76
117,282.78
15,739.97
17,123.89
17,612.17
99.65
4,443.81
8,159.00
24.19
9,969.45
1,917.20
-0-
12.08
3,914,161.37
7/29/92
$1,348,618.71
3,566,669.69
135,371.08
162,216.51
93,624.87
45,011.83
152,482.24
735,744.54
2,160.85
80,088.19
2,657.92
104.72
508,170.06
3,505.22
32.49
6,578.48
6,843,037.40
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the bid tabulation and
recommendation re' Purchase of Traffic
Control Devices, Signholders, Signs
and Accessories, Specification
No. E-216, be, and is hereby,
FURTHER MOVED: That the bid of Pacific Safety and Equipment Company, Inc.
be, and is hereby, rejected as incomplete; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order be, and is hereby, awarded to
J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc. in the total amount of $43,689.24 plus sales tax.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Purchase and Installation
of Fiber Optic Network Between New That the Boards of Directors hereby
Laboratory and Maintenance adopt Resolution No. 92-104,
Operations Control Center, receiving and filing bid tabulation
Specification No. M-040, to Sim J. and recommendation and awarding
Harris Company contract for Purchase and
Installation of Fiber Optic Network
Between New Laboratory and Maintenance/Operations Control Center,
Specification No. M-040, to Sim J. Harris Company for a total amount not to
exceed $59,223.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a
part of these minutes.
08/12/92
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Purchase of Anionic
Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, That the Boards of Directors hereby
Specification No. P-132, to Diatec adopt Resolution No. 92-105,
Environmental receiving and filing bid tabulation
and recommendation and awarding
contract for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer,
Specification No. P-132, to Diatec Environmental for the price of $.039 per
pound, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1992,
with provision for four one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS In response to a request for an
Awarding Purchase of Caustic Soda explanation of why District No. 3 was
Solution, Specification No. P-133, the only District required to pay a
to Western States Chemical Supply large portion of the caustic soda
Corporation solution cost, the General Manager
explained numerous complaints had
been received along the route of the large trunk sewers within District
No. 3 many years ago. The wastewater within these sewers are coming from as
far away as La Habra, taking 35 to 40 hours for some of this wastewater to
travel down to Plant No. 2, thus resulting in many odor complaints. At that
time a consultant was hired to address this problem. The problem was
resolved by caustic soda injections in the upper reaches of the District
No. 3 trunk sewers. He added that the study also determined that Plant
No. 2 received benefits from adding the chemicals upstream, so District
No. 3 is given a credit for the benefit that the jointly owned and operated
treatment plant receives, thereby actually reducing costs to District No. 3.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-106, receiving
and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for
Purchase of Caustic Soda Solution, Specification No. P-133, to Western
States Chemical Supply Corporation, for the delivered price of $271.88 per
dry ton, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1992,
with provision for four one-year extensions, with estimated costs to be
shared as follows:
Treatment Trunk
Plants Sewers
Total
Joint Districts $326,256.00 $285,474.00 $611,730.00
District 3 Only --- 285,474.00 285,474.00
$326,256.00 $570,948.00 $897,204.00
Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
-7-
08/12/92
ALL DISTRICTS
Awarding Laboratory Services
contract for Analyses of Sludge,
Specification No. S-065, to
MacDonald -Stephens Laboratories,
Inc.
filed; and,
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the bid tabulation and
recommendation for Laboratory
Services Contract for Analyses of
Sludge, Specification No. S-065, be,
and is hereby, received and ordered
FURTHER MOVED: That the bids of TBD Environmental Laboratories,
C.L. Technology, Inc. and BC Analytical be, and are hereby, rejected for
non-compliance with the specifications; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said laboratory services purchase order contract be, and
is hereby awarded to MacDonald -Stephens Laboratories, Inc., in an amount not
to exceed $30,750.00, for the period August 13, 1992 to June 30, 1993, with
option for four one-year extensions.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. it to
the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 11 to the plans
Job No. J-17 and specifications for Central
Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing
an addition of $136,617.81 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation
for two items of additional work, and granting a time extension of
63 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby,
approved.
ALL
DISTRICTS
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to issue Change
Order No. 3 to Purchase Order
That staff be, and is hereby,
No.
37965 issued to ur-Lite
authorized to issue Change Order
Corporation
for Purchase of Four
No. 3 to Purchase Order No. 37965
Waste Digester Gas Flares, Job
issued to Sur-Lite Corporation for
No.
J-21A
Purchase of Four Waste Digester Gas
Flares, Job No. J-21A, for a
reduction of the total authorized
amount from $246,960.00 plus sales tax to
$238,737.00 plus sales tax, for
deletion of electrical termination work and
costs due to delays impacting
other construction projects.
ALL
DISTRICTS
Director Collins expressed concern
Approving
Change Order No. 12 to
over the quality of the consulting
the
plans and specifications for
engineer for this project causing
Job
No. J-19-1
numerous change order items because
of design errors or omissions. He
questioned the cost differential
for those items done by change order versus
what it would have been if included
originally in the plans and
specifications. He felt this
was performance that should not be rewarded
and should be penalized. He
also felt that the next time this firm
participated in bidding that
these types of mistakes be remembered and taken
into account in some fashion.
08/12/92
The Director of Engineering agreed that all of the omissions should have
been included in the design contract. He pointed out that it was a very
complex job but that that was no excuse. He also agreed that there was a
cost differential that was probably higher by change order versus being
included in the original bid, but observed that it was very difficult to
assess.
Mr. Dawes reviewed the difference between what is called design omissions
versus error omissions. He pointed out that in his opinion Item 4 was a
consultant error, and they will demand the consultant to pay that amount.
He also reviewed the other change order items.
In response to Directors' questions regarding plan checking by staff, the
Director of Engineering explained that his staff does some plan checks,
although they are limited in their ability to do so because of staff
resources. Staff is working on improving this situation. Currently, the
Districts have hired a second consultant to do a plan check on another
extremely complicated design to hopefully avoid, or at least minimize, these
types of situations.
The Directors then requested that the cumulative totals of change orders be
highlighted in future agenda reports.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 12 to the plans and specifications for Central Power
Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of
$51,966.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for four items of
additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Gas Handling Facilities
at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Jo
No. P1-34-1
Approving Change Order No. 22 to Moved, seconded and duly carried:
the plans and specifications for
Job No. Pi-34-1 That Change Order No. 22 to the
plans and specifications for said
project, authorizing a net addition of $56,349.33 to the contract with
Ziebarth & Alper for 14 items of added or deleted work, and granting a
time extension of 61 calendar days for completion of said additional
work, be, and is hereby, approved.
Approving Change Order No. 23 to
the plans and specifications for
Job No. P1-34-1
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 23 to the
plans and specifications for said
project, authorizing a net deduction of $61,818.63 from the contract
with Ziebarth & Alper for four items of deleted work or revised
contract provisions, be, and is hereby, approved
Accepting Job No. P1-34-1 as Moved, seconded and duly carried:
complete
That the Boards of Directors
hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-107, accepting Gas Handling Facilities
at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-1, as complete, authorizing
execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout
Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part
of these minutes.
-9-
08/12/92
'..011
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 12 to
the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 12 to the plans
Job Nos. P1-34-3, Pi-35-2 and J-21 and specifications for Construction
of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and
10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste
Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21, authorizing
an addition of $10,336.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors,
Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc., for two items of additional work, be,
and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 8 to the
Professional Services Agreement That the Selection Committee
with Brown and Caldwell Consulting certification of the final negotiated
Engineers for design of Central fee relative to Addendum No. 8 to the
Power Generation Systems re Job Professional Services Agreement with
No. J-19 Brown and Caldwell Consulting
Engineers for design of Central Power
J-19, providing for additional inspection and
hereby, received, ordered filed and approved;
Generation Systems, Job No.
design services, be, and is
and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 92-108, approving Addendum No. 8 to said agreement with Brown and
Caldwell Consulting Engineers for said additional services, on an
hourly -rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses,
subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed
$292,024.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $4,179,112.00
to an amount not to exceed $4,471,136.00. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Agreement with
J. T. Horvath & Associates for
specialized construction management
and inspection services re various
master -planned construction
projects
master -planned construction projects,
filed and approved; and,
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Selection Committee
certification of the final negotiated
fee relative to Agreement with
J. T. Horvath & Associates for
specialized construction management
and inspection services re various
be, and is hereby, received, ordered
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 92-109, approving said agreement with J. T. Horvath & Associates for
said services, on an as -needed basis, for a two-year period beginning
October 11, 1992, with option for a one-year extension, at the following
hourly rates:
Agreement Period Rate
10/11/92 - 10/10/93 $39.20
10/11/93 - 10/10/94 40.95
10/11/94 - 10/10/95 42.80
Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
-10-
08/12/92
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving Addendum No. 2 to the
Professional Services Agreement
with Martin Kordick, Sr. for
specialized construction inspection
services re various master -planned
construction projects
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 92-110,
approving Addendum No. 2 to the
Professional Services Agreement with
Martin Kordick, Sr. for specialized
construction inspection services re
various master -planned construction projects, providing for extension of
said agreement from August 10, 1992 through December 31, 1992 with no
increase in the hourly rate. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is
hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to solicit proposals and negotiate
a Professional Services Agreement
for design and construction
services for Job Nos. P1-41 and
P2-48
Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1,
Clarifiers A through Q at Plant No. 2,
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing renewal of membership
in the Santa Ana River Flood
Protection Agency SARFPA
fiscal year, be, and is hereby,
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing membership in the
Southern California Alliance of
Publicly Owned Treatment Works
SCAPOTW
hereby, authorized.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive, file and approve written
report of the Special Joint Works
Selection Committee
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Selection Committee be, and
is hereby, authorized to solicit
proposals and negotiate a
Professional Services Agreement for
design and construction services
required for Rehabilitation of
Job No. P1-41, and Rehabilitation of
Job No. P2-48.
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That renewal of
Santa Ana River
Agency (SARFPA)
authorized.
on July 16, 1992, be, and is hereby,
ALL DISTRICTS
Approving agreement with
RJN Computer Services, Inc., for
design and installation of
Computer -Aided u port System for
Maintenance Management,
Specification No. S-059
membership in the
Flood Protection
for the 1992-93
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That membership in the Southern
California Alliance of Publicly Owned
Treatment Works (SCAPOTW) for the
1992-93 fiscal year, be, and is
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the written report of the
Special Joint Works Selection
Committee's meeting re Computers held
received, ordered filed and approved.
Management, Specification No. S-059, i
applicable taxes. Said resolution, by
part of these minutes.
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 92-111,
approving agreement with RJN Computer
Services, Inc., for design and
installation of Computer -Aided
Support System for Maintenance
n the amount of $548,525.00, including
reference hereto, is hereby made a
-11-
08/12/92
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive, file and approve written
reports of the Fiscal Policy
Committee and Executive Committee
1992, be and are hereby, received,
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the written reports of the
Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive
Committee meetings held on July 29,
ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving an Agreement re: _
Application for Specific Plan of That the Boards of Directors hereby
Site Use and Development with the _ adopt Resolution No. 92-112,
City of Fountain Valley at approving an Agreement re:
Reclamation Plant No. 1 Application for Specific Plan of Site
Use and Development with the City of
Fountain Valley at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 2, 3, 5, 7 & 11
Confirming fees, procedures and
policies concerning annexations of
territory to the Districts
confirming fees, procedures and
to the Districts, and foregoing
fiscal year 1992-93:
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt the following resolutions
amending Districts' resolutions
policies concerning annexations of territory
the automatic annexation fee increase for
1992
- 93
Confirming
Acreage
Fee
Resolution
Resolution
w Tax
w/o Tax
Dist.
No.
No.
Exchange
Exchange
2
92-113-2
91-113-2
$2,922
$3,908
3
92-114-3
91-114-3
$3,154
$4,139
5
92-115-5
91-115-5
$3,054
$4,084
7
92-116-7
91-116-7
$2,902
$3,883
11
92-117-11
91-117-11
$4,843
$5,830
Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve written
report of the Conservation, Recycle That the written report of the
and Reuse Committee Conservation, Recycle and Reuse
Committee's meeting on July 28, 1992,
be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the
General Counsel's Comments Prior to Directors of the need for a closed
Closed Session session as authorized by Government
Code Sections 54956.9 and 54957.6 to
review:
1) Recommendation relative to a Worker's Compensation claim pertaining to
�✓ an employee.
-12-
08/12/92
2) A proposed settlement of litigation entitled, United States Government
vs. Montrose Chemical Company, County Sanitation Districts.
3) Proposed initiation of litigation against United Oil Company for damages
incurred by the Districts as a result of activities of United Oil
Company in one of their facilities.
4) Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the
manufacturer and general contractor on Districts' two jobs relating to
the co -generation combustion engines.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Convene in closed session pursuant
to Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session
at 8:25 p.m. pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9 and 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed
Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance
with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the
Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and
Committee Closed Meetings.
ALL DISTRICTS At 9:50 p.m. the Boards reconvened in
Reconvene in regular session regular session.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m.,
August 19, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:50 p.m., August 12, 1992.
DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Agreement with the Garden
Grove Agency for Community That the Boards of Directors hereby
Development adopt Resolution No. 92-118,
approving Agreement with the Garden
Grove Agency for Community Development, electing a tax increment
pass -through relative to an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the
Garden Grove Community Project, in accordance with Districts' policy and
pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Professional Services
Agreement with Church Engineering, That the Selection Committee
Inc. for design and construction certification of the final negotiated
support services for Contract fee relative to the Professional
No. 2-9-R1 Services Agreement with Church
Engineering, Inc. for design and
construction support services for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk
Sewer, from Imperial Highway West of Kraemer Boulevard to the Intersection
of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road, Contract No. 2-9-R1, be, and
is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution
No. 92-119-2, approving said agreement with Church Engineering, Inc. for
said services, on an hourly -rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct
expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to
exceed $119,524.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a
part of these minutes.
-13-
111.�
"M.
11.01,
DISTRICT 2
Adjournment
Directors of County Sanitation
August 19, 1992. The Chairman
9:50 p.m., August 12, 1992.
DISTRICT 3
Adjournment
Directors of County Sanitation
August 19, 1992. The Chairman
9:50 p.m., August 12, 1992.
DISTRICT 7
Awarding contract for Abandonment
of Portion of MacArthur Trunk
Sewer within John Wayne Airport,
Contract No. 7-1B-1, to Colich
Bros., Inc. dba Colich -& Sons
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
District No. 2 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m.,
then declared the meeting so adjourned at
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of
District No. 3 be adjourned
then declared the meeting so
of MacArthur Trunk Sewer within John
Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons,
Said resolution, by reference hereto,
minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Actions re Irvine -Newport Subtrunk
Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-3E-2
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the
tans and specifications for
the Board of
to 7:30 p.m.,
adjourned at
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 92-121-7,
receiving and filing bid tabulation
and recommendation and awarding
contract for Abandonment of Portion
Wayne Airport, Contract No. 7-1B-1, to
in the total amount of $62,000.00.
is hereby made a part of these
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Contract No. 7- E-2 That Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for
Irvine -Newport Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-3E-2, authorizing
an addition of $92,407.00 to the contract with Colich & Sons for seven
items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 37 calendar
days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby,
approved.
Accepting Contract No. 7-3E-2 as Moved, seconded and duly carried:
complete
That the Board of Directors
hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-122-7, accepting Irvine -Newport
Subtrunk Relief Sewer, Contract No. 7-3E-2, as complete, authorizing
execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout
Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part
of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving plans and specifications
for Contract No. 7-14-1-1 That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 92-123-7,
approving plans and specifications for Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station,
Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1, and authorizing the General Manager to
establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
5E,S
08/12/92
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving_ Reimbursement Agreement
with Orange County Flood Control That the Board of Directors hereby
District re Contract No. 7-1-2 in adopts Resolution No. 92-124-7,
conjunction with OCFCD improvements approving Agreement with the Orange
to the Santa Ana -Delhi Channel County Flood Control District,
providing for reimbursement of costs
to the Flood Control District for Relocation of the District's Gisler -Red
Hill Trunk Sewer Siphon under the Santa Ana -Delhi Channel, Contract
No. 7-1-2, in conjunction with OCFCD improvements to the Santa Ana -Delhi
Channel within the Cities of Tustin, Irvine, Santa Ana, Costa Mesa and
unincorporated County territory; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That payment of a $55,000.00 deposit for District's portion
of said work, be, and is hereby, authorized. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m.,
August 19, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:50 p.m., August 12, 1992.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m.,
August 19, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:50 p.m., August 12, 1992.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., August 12, 1992.
DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving lans and s ec fications
for Contract Nos. 5-32 and 5-33 That the Boards of Directors hereby
adopt Resolution No. 92-120,
approving plans and specifications for Improvements to Bitter Point and
Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge
Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33, and authorizing the General Manager to
establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 4 to the
plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 4 to the plans
Contract No. 5-34-3 and specifications for Improvements
Phase 3,
contract
52 days
day, be,
to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer,
Contract No. 5-34-3, authorizing an addition of $104,000.00 to the
with Silveri & LeBouef for a contract -specified bonus payment for
early completion of certain work, based on the rate of $2,000 per
and is hereby, approved.
-15-
08/12/92
DISTRICTS 5, 6 & 14
Actions re Agreement for Purchase
of Capacity and Payment of
Operational and Maintenance Charges
relative to San Joaquin Hills
Planned Community
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering
reported that last year, Irvine
Ranch Water District (IRWD) approached District No. 5 regarding the San
Joaquin Hills Planned Community (SJHPC).presently undergoing
development by The Irvine Company. The SJHPC lies partly within
District No. 5 and partially within District No. 14 with an island
between the boundaries of Districts 5 and 14. This area was originally
intended to be a part of District No. 14 but was inadvertently
overlooked during the original formation of District 14. The
annexation of this area to District No. 14 would be processed
separately at a future date.
Mr. Dawes further reported that the SJHPC development could best be
served locally by IRWD wastewater collection facilities; however, there
are no transmission facilities owned by either IRWD or District No. 14
which could deliver flows to IRWD's Michelson Treatment Plant.
Delivery to the Districts' Joint Treatment and Disposal Facilities
would require use of District Nos. 5 and 6 sewer lines by District
No. 14. If the proposed agreement is approved, IRWD's local collector
system would deliver flows to the regional collection facilities of
District Nos. 5 and 6.
He further stated that in order to best accommodate flows from SJHPC,
an agreement had been prepared which provides for District 14 to
purchase between 4% and 5% capacity in the District 5 and 6 trunk
system, and for District Nos. 5, 6 and 14 to share in the operation and
maintenance costs of the sewers. The estimated "buy -in" cost is
$1,389,129.97. The "buy -in" cost to District 14 for existing
facilities is $878,729.97, the payment of which will be divided between
District 5 ($855,400.03) and District 6 ($23,340.94), based on their
proportionate ownership of existing capacity. The balance of the
payment will be similarly divided when the future facilities are
completed, at which time District 14 will pay an estimated $518,300.00
to District 5 and $1,100.00 to District 6.
The Director of Engineering also reported that within the SJHPC, north
of the District 5 boundary, is a portion of the "Downcoast Area" for
which IRWD paid connection fees as part of Annexation No. 7 to District
No. 5. Included in the proposed agreement is a provision to refund to
IRWD funds incorrectly paid to District 5 for connection fees on
properties located outside of District No. 5. Connection fees for 509
residential units, which are now planned to be built in SJHPC within
District No. 14, were paid to District No. 5 at the capital facilities
charge of $1,500.00 per residential unit. Therefore the sum to be
refunded by District No. 5 to IRWD is $763,500.00.
-16-
08/12/92
Mr. Dawes stated that the agreement provides an economical way to serve
this area without IRWD being forced to build costly lines to the
Michelson Reclamation Plant, with Districts 5 and 6 having adequate
capacity within their lines to support this sale, and staff recommended
approval of this agreement.
A brief discussion followed in response to a question by Director
Sherrick regarding the advisability of District No. 6 selling reserve
capacity in its system to accommodate the proposed arrangement.
Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried:
dated August 199
That the Staff Report dated
August 3, 1992 re proposed Agreement for Purchase of Capacity and
Payment of Operational and Maintenance Charges relative to San Joaquin
Hills Planned Community, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
Approving Agreement for Purchase of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Capacity and Payment of Operational
and Maintenance Charges relative to That the Boards of Directors
an Joa uin Hills Planned hereby adopt Resolution
Community JHPC No. 92-125, approving Agreement
for Purchase of Capacity and
Maintenance Charges relative to San Joaquin Hills Planned Community
(SJHPC) among Districts Nos. 5, 6 and 14 and the Irvine Ranch Water
District (IRWD), providing for the purchase by District No. 14 of
capacity in transmission facilities owned by Districts 5 and 6, and
providing further for the reimbursement by District No. 5 to IRWD of a
prior overpayment of connection charges relative to properties within _
the SJHPC. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part
of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m.,
August 19, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
10:05 p.m., August 12, 1992.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m.,
August 19, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
10:05 p.m., August 12, 1992.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:05 p.m., August 12, 1992.
As istant Se tar f the Boards
of Directors f County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11,
13 and 14
-17-
m
X
bd
-I
1
(INC
10 9199 - JT DIST WIRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY -
CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE 07/01/92
WARRANT NC. VENCCP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
122993
ASP ANALYSIS
122994
A 7 i T
122955
AMERICAN TELEPHONE 3 TELEGRAPH
122996
A T S T
122997-
ACCU•LABS RESEARCH .INC -
122998
AIR PRODUCTS 9 CHEMICAL 1N
122999
AMERICAN AIR FILTER INC
123000
ROBCO INC S/CR AMERICAN SEALS
123001
AMERICAN SICFA
123OC2
APCRICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLECIN
123003 _
ANAHEIM ..SEWER ..CONSTRUCTION
123004
CHARLES E. ANDERSON
123005
AN7HCNY$S MECH S MACHINE+ INC.
123006
A -PLUS SYSTEMS
123067
ABC LABCRATORIES
123008
ARIZONA INSTRUMENT
.123009 -
_. .ASSOCIATED. SOILS. ENGINEERING.
121010
ASSOC@ ADFINIS. R CONSULTANTS
123011
ASSCC. ACFIN 9 CONSULT.
123012
ASSOC ACFINIS 9 CONSLLTANTS
123013
ANSA
123014
AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO
123015
-. AUTOCCN INDUSTRIES INC:
123016
ALARCS a TPCPNIES
12Z017
BC ANALYTICAL
123018
BRW .SAFETY R SUPQLY
123019
BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE
123020
BAILEY CONTROLS COMPANY
123021
BANANA.BLLEPRINT _
123022
B BATEFAN
121023
BAI7ERY SFECIAL7IES
123024
_ BAM7ER EIACNCSTICS INC
123025
BAYLESS STATIONERS
123026
ROBERT BEIN WILLIAM FROST
123027
J A H BERGE .INC
123028
WT BILLARC INC
123025
BIC+RAC LAECA47CRIES
123C3V.
BID TECH NET• INC ..
123031
DOLTRONIX DATA MAINTENANCE
123032
BRINDERSON CORP
123033.
BRCWN 8 CALCWELL CONSULTING
1230!4
BLILCERIS EFFCRILM
123035
BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC
_. 123036 .. _
GARY G . S7REEO
123037
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY
123038
C 9 S COMFLNICATIONS
$960.U0
ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS
S29934.56
LONGS DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES-----
$19505.68
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
$178037
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
550.00
LAB SERVICES - -- --- -
$169815.00
O&M AGREEMENT OSY GEN SYST. M.0.8-9-89
$19439.03
MECHANICAL PARTS
$522.70
MECHANICAL PARTS - - -
$157.22
METER PARTS
S440.25
LAB SUPPLIES
S169026.78
EMERGENCY SEWER•REPAIRS DIST-7------•---
S290.00
MECHANICAL REPAIRS
S571.71
SHAFT REPAIRS
$39207.26
NOTICES & ADS --- - ---
S235.00
SERVICE AGREEMENT
S101.25
INSTRUMENT PARTS
S3.100.00
- - SOIL TESTING - •----- -_•. -._ __
1105.00
MEDICAL CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
S79540.00
EMPLOYEE PRESCRIPTION CARDS
S150.00
EMPLOYEE PRESCRIPTION CARDS PRINTING_
S750.00
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
S29TO1.71
TRUCK PARTS
S392.62
- ELECTRIC- PARTS----------
S50.59
AWARD PLAQUES
$39720.00
LAB SUPPLIES
S39.98 _
SAFETY SUPPLIES..____-. _.
S128.OQ
BACKFLOW TESTING
S138.79
TOLL
S1a767.42-
__.. BLUEPRINTING M.O.IOT-IO-9O -.
$600.00
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
$19834951
BATTERIES
S79036.71
_ _._ _ LAB _SUPPLIES
S49.95
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$800000
ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-34
S297.66 ..-
_.LAB. SUPPLIES.._._.-._
$619@70
TRUCK PARTS
S629.98
LAB SUPPLIES
$156.61
SERVICE AGREEMENT._....
S285.00
COMPUTER DATA DISK MAINTENANCE
S419445.49
CONSTRUCTION J-19-2
S28 9 225.98 ___ . _ _
_.. ENGINEERING SERVICES
5241.7E
HARDWARE/LUMBER
S29604.00
SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-12-91
$89011@12
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT.__.-__-.
S562.78
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$92.28
OFFICE SUPPLIES
m
X
to
a
I
fV
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY .. - - ----.-.---•- -
CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE 07/01/92
WARRAQT-NO. -__ VENDOR.. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION -
123039 C M T 5488.97 ELECTRIC PARTS
123040 CS CCMPANY 519879.73 VALVE ---.
123041 CALTRCL INC $379.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
123042 CALIFCRNIA ALTC CCLLISICN INC S1s321.56 TRUCK REPAIRS
123043 CALIFCRNIA AUTOMATIC GATE 5297.1b SERVICE AGREEMENT
123044 CA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 119323.42 COOPERATIVE BIOASSAY RESEARCH
123045 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 51309992.02 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38, P1-20
123046 CENTLRY SAFETY INST 9 SUPF 5169662.04 SAFETY SUPPLIES
123047 CERTIFIEC LAECRA70RIES $300.00 LUBE OIL
123048 CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS SERVICE 5390.0U SUBSCRIPTION
123049 CHEVRON USA INC $59345.78 OIL -.. -
123050 CITY WIRE CLOTH INC $17.31 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
123051 COLICH AAC SCNS 51*8949053.00 CONSTRUCTION I-9
123052 CCHPLSAs INC. S29162.22 COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE.
1230E3 CCNNELL EP FARTS I DIV $127.58 TRUCK PARTS
123054 CON -WAY ►ESTERN EXFRESS $79.49 FREIGHT
123055 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL, GIST S79581.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
1230a6 CCNTAINERIZED CHEMICAL DISPC S190000 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL
123057 CCNTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC 539742.09 TOOLS
1230-E CCNTINENTEL. CHEMICAL CC S40848075 CHLORINE M.0.10-19-91
123059 CORE -LABS 519350.00 LAB SUPPLIES
123060 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 5927.54 TRUCK PARTS.
123061 STATE OF CALIFORNIA S18r667.00 SALES TAX PAYMENT.___._ _
123062 DAILY PILCT 550.00 NOTICES & ADS
123063 CAPES A PCCRE $559003.79 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-3
123064 J.L. C'ANCELC CC INC S29122@68 PIPE
123065 CANIELS TIRE SERVICE $43964 TIRES
123066 DATA STORM $76.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
123067 PETER C DAVID CO $1369387.80 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2_ ... _._---�-
123068 DEZURIK ANOICR CS CO 519940.60 VALVES
123069 OIATEC ENVIRCNPENTAL 529264.26 CHEMICALS M.0.10-9-91
123CIO DIFILIPPC ASSCCIATES $54.95 PRINTING _.._
123071 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP $561875084 COMPUTER NETWORK SERVICES M.O.1-9-92
123072 SYCON CORP 5146.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES
123073 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTION 58 085.31 CRANE MAINTENANCE_._ _
123074 OCRAEC ENTERFRISES INC 5169278.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS
12!075 CLNN EC4OFCS CCRP $39816*73 PAINT SUPPLIES
123076, DURO-SENSE CORP 5749.64 . MECHANICAL PARTS...-
123077 DWYER INSTRUMENT INC 5948.55 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
123078 DOVALS SALES 5299.13 FITTINGS
123079 EASTPAN INC 15*198.06 OFFICE SUPPLIES
123080 ECCANALYSIS INC $59594.59 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91�
12!OE1 ECIARCS HIGH VACLLP INTER. 51*708.56 LAB SUPPLIES
123082 ELECTRO NUMERICS INC $19548.01 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
123083 ENCHANTER INC 529940.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91
123084 ENSECO-CALLAB $2.680.00 LAB SUPPLIES
m
X
r-�
t7d
n
I
W
.1
F nI NC .9199
JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL
FROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 FAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
- - --- -
COUNTY
SANITATION
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE
07/01/92
WARRANT NO. _.. ._
VEACOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION--..-
. 123085
EN VIRONMENIAL RESOURCE ASSCC
S19089.5G
LAB SERVICES
-.-.123086 - -
EXCELLENCE IN TRAINING
S906.00
PUBLICATION - -
123087
MARSHALL FAIRPES
S178.08
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
123088
JCHN 9 FALKENSTEIN PE
$39400800
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16
1230E9- -. ...
FECEPAL EMPRESS CORP
$370.25
AIR FREIGHT
123090
FERRELLCAS
S153.09
PROPANE
123091
FILTER SUPPLY CO
S514.34
CHLORINATION PARTS
123092 ..
FISCHER t PORTER CO
S784.38
CHLORINATION PARTS
123093
FISHEP SCIENTIFIC CO
S19057.73
LAB SUPPLIES
123094
FISORS IKSTRUPENIS
$189388@50
LAB EQUIPMENT
123055 _
FLC-SYSIEPS
S333.92
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
123096
FCRBES CCMPUTEP GROUP INC
$99862.36
COMPUTER SYSTEMS
123097
FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA
S35.21
FILM
- 123098
CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY
S1o620.00
HAZARDOUS WASTE DISCLOSURES _
123099
FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT
S570.56
PAINT SUPPLIES
123100
FCX ENIEPPRISES
S19825.00
SAFETY CONSULTANT
1231C1-
FCX.IAOLSIRIAL SALES
$103.70
PAINT SUPPLIES
123102
ThE FOXBCRO CO
$93.78
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
123103
FREDSON RV SUPPLY
$39.80
TRUCK PARTS
123104
BUD FREY
S71.16
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION _..
123105
GCS SERVICE
$163.58
LAB SUPPLIES
123106
GAQAhl LLPBER CO
S260.71
HARDWARE/LUMBER
1231C7
GAUGE REPAIR SERVICE
$377.04
INSTRUMENT REPAIR .___.---_-.__._. ...._-_.._._.._
123108
GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CC.
S948.81
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
123109
GENERAL TELEPHONE CO
$49338.75
TELEPHONE SERVICES
123110
GENOSYS BIOTECHNOLOGIES
$39077.75
LAB SUPPLIES
123111
LIFE TECHhCLOGIF.S/GIBCO/BRL
S121952
LAB SUPPLIES
123112
GIERLICH-PITCHELL INC
$159348.12
MECHANICAL PARTS
12!113
-GRAPFIC CISIRIEUTCRS
S443.93
FILM
123114
DAVID R. GRIFFIN
$99000000
LEGAL SERVICES
123115
H8 TYPE 9 GRAPHICS
$10.78
OFFICE SUPPLIES
123116..
GECRGE T HALL CO
S19698686
MOTORS
123117
FRED A CARPER
$19500000
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
12.116
HARRIAGICP INDUSTRIAL FLASII
S19086.39
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
123119
HAULAWAY CONTAINERS
$29700.00
TRASH REMOVAL
123120
EG HELLEROS SON INC
$33.02
TOOLS
123121
HOERRIGER CVS CALIF INC
S394.85
MECHANICAL PARTS
123122
J.T. HORVATH 6 ASSOC.
$39000400
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J717. _
123123
AS HUGFEE CC INC
S246.97
PAINT SUPPLIES
1231i4
CITY OF FLAIIPCTCR BEACI,
S179233.5G
WATER USE
123125
HUATIAGTCK VALLEY SCHWINN C
3172.18
BICYCLE PARTS
123126
ICC INSTRUMENT
146.73
METER
12312T
I.G. INDUSTRIAL CORP.
$39133.87
CHEMICALS
__123128_ _.
IMPERIAL .LEST _CHEMICAL
S329155.90
FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-14-94
123129
IA-CICE TECHNCLOCIES INC
S389.12
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
123130
INCUSTRIAL ThREADED PRODUCTS
S246.96
CONNECTORS
m
x
bd
FUND NC 9199
JT DIST YCRKINC CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 6125192 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CCUhTY
SANITATICN
DISTRICTS OF CRANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS
PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE
07/01/92
WARRANT N0.•
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION _...__.
123131
IRCRAP PAPER
$29555.60
OFFICE SUPPLIES
123122
Ih7ERPOLKI AIN SCIENTIFIC CGRF
$79080.12
LAB SUPPLIES
123133
INSTRUMENT SPECIALISTS
S79000.00
LAB SUPPLIES
123134
J 6 M SERVICE
$117.48
TRUCK PARTS
123135--
J 6 .W SCIENTIFIC...
$552@20
LAB SUPPLIES
123136
GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP
S999.83
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
123137
JAY•. CAIERIKC
$662.29
DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES
123138
JET FCRP CCRP.
$518@06
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
123139
JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
S868.22
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
123140
KARLEE COMPANY
S339.27
PAINT SUPPLIES
123141
KELLEY .RLLE BOCK
S137.92
SUBSCRIPTION
123142
KING BEADING INC
$588.45
MACHINE SUPPLIES
123143
KhCX IhCLSM AL. SUFFLTES
S19854.99
TOOLS
123144
MARTIN KCRDICK SR
$19443975
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9
123145
LEEWARD SHELVING 6 FILE SYS.
$191090
OFFICE SUPPLIES
123146
LIFECOM•SAFETY SERVICE SUPPL
S118614
SAFETY SUPPLIES
123147
LIMITOROUE CORP
S29826.46
MECHANICAL REPAIR
123148
KP LINCS1RCM INC
S29945.00
CONSULTING SERVICES - NPDES PERMIT
123149
SCCC-LYhCF CCRF
1583.40
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
123150
PDT EICLCCIC. CCPPANY
1245.76
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
123151
SUSAN MURCOTT
$39242*45
CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL
123152
MPS
S220.31
PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
123153
MACOPCO
$728.84
INSTRUMENT
123154
MAINTENANCE PROCUCTS INC
52*353.56
MECHANICAL PARTS
123155
PANTEK
$211.10
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
123156
MARVAC -ELECTRONICS
S67.95
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
123157
MATT - CHLOR INC
$39176.52
CHLORINATION PARTS
123158
MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS INC
S420.04
INSTRUMENT PARTS
123159
MECHANICAL SEAL REPAIR
$151.31
PUMP PARTS
123160
PICRCAGE CF CERRITCS
$741041
INSTRUMENT PARTS
1231E1
P1C►AY PFf R PACFINING
S189824.62
MECHANICAL PARTS
123162
MITChELL INTERNATIONAL INC
S116.37
PUBLICATION
123163
MITCHELL PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS
S269160.30
CONSTRUCTION 7-11-2
123164
JAMES M MONTGOMERY
$49756.21
CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.12-12-90
123165
MCNTGCMERY LABORATORIES
S159537.00
LAB SERVICES.
123166
P.USTANG UNITS COMPANY
$213.00
HARDWARE
123167
hAIICRAL SANITARY SUFFLY
$218.09
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
123168
NEWARK ELECTRONICS
S760.95
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES.
123169
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
S11.15
WATER USE
123170
OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES
$678086
REIMBURSABLE SAFETY GLASSES
123171
OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR P.ES
$62.92
OFFICE FURNITURE
123172
DX SYSTEMS CC
S179564.37
CHLORINE M.0.10-10-91
121173
OPERATION TLCHNCLOGY INC
S850900
TRAINING REGISTRATION
123174
ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C
S274.36
TRUCK PARTS _..__.
123175
ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO
S29797.12
CHEMICALS
123176
ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CC,
S29195.75
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199
JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL
PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
-
COUNTY
SANITATION
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY -.-- - -. -.-
CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE
07/01/92
YARRAA7 N0,
VEhDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
123177
OXYGEN SERVICE
S6.119.58
SPECIALTY GASSES
123178
COUNTY OF ORANGE
S89502.94
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT .....-
123179
CSCOC SELF -FUNDED MEDICAL I
$1009000.00
SELF -FUNDED HEALTH PLAN PREMIUM ADVANCE
1231E0
CCLN7Y SlhITA7ICh CISTRICT
S49245.22
REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
123181
PACE MEPEERSFIP WAREHOUSE
$45.00
MEMBERSHIP FEB
123182
PACIFIC ENERGY RESOURCES
S1639000000
OIL WELL ABANDON/CLEAN-UP H.O.10-9-91
123183
PACIFIC PARTS
S49343.60
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
123184
PACIFIC SAFETY EOU1PMEh7 CC
$65.98
SAFETY SUPPLIES _.... ..
123185
PACIFIC EELL
5668.9E
TELEPHONE SERVICES
12ME
PACIFIC 1/LK-Ih MEDICAL
$980000
MEDICAL EXAMS
123187
PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS
S89609018
TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS_
123188
PAK WEST
$19101015
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
123189
PARAGON CABLE
S46.78
CABLE SERVICES
123190
PARTS UNLIMITED
S1.336.00
TRUCK PARTS _.
123151
RCY FEhCERGRAFT
$460.00
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
123192
PERKIK-ELDER CORPORATION
$19906.25
LAB SUPPLIES
123193
PERMA . PURE PRODUCTS INC
$89328.60
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
123194
PETLAND PAVILION
S96.81
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
12!195
PICK►ICK PAPER
S67.88
OFFICE SUPPLIES
123196_
PIPA GRC SYSTEMS INC
S1109607.22
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91
123197
PICNEER BANK
$179471.90
CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-34-3
123198
PITNEY BCWES
S183.18
POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE
123199
POLYMETRICS9 INC.
$954.50
EQUIPMENT RENTAL.
123200
POLYPURE INC
$219170.24
CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
123201
PCSITIVE FCRMULA70RS9 INC.
S242.30
GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES
12E2C2
PRECISICK INDLSIRIES
S20.81
FITTINGS
123203
HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE
$196000
ICE
123204
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND.
S49269.OD
SOIL TESTING
123205
THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO.
34.720.00
INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTIOR M.Q.7-123206
PRO LAB DIAGNCSTICS
S230.94
LAB SUPPLIES
123207
AQUA-CHEFv IhC
S19630.71
BOILER PARTS
12!2C8
SIEVE P. FACCS• IhC.
$190499287.00
CONSTRUCTION 14-1-14-2 A 1-16
123209
RAINIK INSTRUMENT CO
S685.06
LAB SUPPLIES
123210
RECYC INC
$429955.89
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.7-13-91
123211
RED LINE ENTERPRISE
5520.00
STREET SWEEPING ___.___-__ _.
123212
REC WING SHCES
$331087
REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
123213
RECI EUPFESS
$97.65
MESSENGER SERVICES
123214
ThE REGISTER
S682.50
NOTICE$ & ADS
123215
MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY
$29727.58
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
123216
RESTEK CORP
S726.31
LAB SUPPLIES
123217
ROSINSOK FERTILIZER CO
S495.87
GROUNDSKEEPING
123218
RCSEPCUhliLKILCC
S19575.64
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
123219
PEGGY RLPF
$540900
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
123220
JOSEPH T RYERSCK B SCN IN
SIs891&66
METAT, _.. _....._._._.___ .-
123221
SAFETY-KLEEN CORP
$242.25
PARTS CLEANER
123222
SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS
S39683.12
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199
- JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
_.. __..__..._
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS
PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE
07/01/92
WARRANT NO.
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
123223
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTOL
S2459707.62
OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-12-91
123224 --
SCCTT CCFFANY
S39065900
TRUCK SCALE REPLACEMENT M.0.5-8-91 .-
123225
SEA COAST DESIGNS
s110.93
OFFICE SUPPLIES
12222E
SEAVENILRES
S19128@50
OCEAN MONITORING
123227.
SERPENTIX CONVEYCR.._CORP
529091.02
MECHANICAL SUPPLIE3
123228
SEWER EOUIP CO OF AMERICA
S10S 3.63
MECHANICAL REPAIRS
123229
SHAMROCK SCIENTIFIC SPEC SYS
S120.44
LAB SUPPLIES
123230
SHAMROCK SUPPLY
$133001
TOOLS
123231
SHASTA ELECTRIC
$491.74
ELECTRIC SERVICES
123222
ShURELUCK SALES
S59775.92
TOOLS/HARDWARE
_. 123233 ....
SIGMA .ChEPICAL CO
S421.27
LAB SUPPLIES-
123234
SILVERI 6 LE BOUEF
$1579247.10
CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3
123235
SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI
S674000
PRE -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EkAMS
_.123236
SMITH•EFERY CO
S746.00
SOIL TESTING M.0.7-:17-91
123237
SFITh PIFE E SUPPLY INC
$19072.55
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
12!238
SCNNENSCHEIN MATH 6 RCSENIP
$455900
LEGAL SERVICES - PERSONNEL
123239-
SCUTh COAST WATER
S87.50
WATER USE
123240
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO
s3769235.46
POWER
123241
SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO
S89512.91
DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL
_123242
WESTALLCY INC
$19040.41
WELDING SUPPLIES_
123243
SPECIAL FLASTIC SYSTEPS INC
S19093.49
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
12:2A4
SFECIRUP•hLPAN RESCURCE SYS
$900000
TRAINING REGISTRATION
123245
SPEX INOLSTRIES INC
S719.14
LAB SUPPLIS3 _ _.__ __-.-._ _
123246
STANCOfS VACUUM SERVCE
$19144000
VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
123247
STARNA CELLS• INC.
S314.77
LAB SUPPLIES
_ 123248.-
STATEWICE INSTALLERS---.
S19989499
_ MOVING SERVICES_ LABORATORY_.EQLISE-_-
123249
S7ERLINE ART
S195.01
OFFICE SUPPLIES
123250
STROFBOTNE PRINTING
S944.97
PRINTING
123251 - _ ._
SUNSET.... FORD . __
$337.80
_ TRUCK PARTS__-__-___._-
123252
SUPER CHEM CORP
S19209.55
CHEMICALS
1232°3
SUPER TECF REFERENCE GUIDE
$74.85
PUBLICATION
-123254 _.
SUPERIOR INTERLOCK CCRP
se7.33
_ _ .. HARDWARE
12!2i5
TAYLCR 1NELSIRIAL SCFIWAFE
$29387.02
TRAINING REGISTRATION
123256
TEXAS CCMPERCE BANK
S10.731.61
C.O.P. ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
___123257 .. __._
THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL -.SUPPLY.
S64.68 _
_ MECHANICAL SUPPLIES_... _
123258
THOMSON TECHNOLOGY♦ INC.
$285.42
ELECTRIC PARTS
123259
TONY•S LCCK I SAFE SERVICE
$602.07
RE -KEY LOCKS
___123260. _ ...TRAVEL
TFAVEL
$128000
TRAVEL SERVICE$ N.0.6-12_91
123261
TRUCK S AUTC SUPPLY INC
$347.39
TRUCK PARTS
123262
TRUESDAIL LABS
S130.00
ASBESTOS TESTING
123263
.._TUSTIN . DODGE
$43.41
_ . TRUCK PARTS
123264
TWINING LABORATCRIES CF
S99147.00
PIPE INSPECTION
123265
URISA
S80.00
SUBSCRIPTION
._1222E6 _
ULIRA .SY11EMS
$19862*53
ENGINEERING_SERVIC99
123267
UNION BANK
S29906.70
CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 7-11-2
123268
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
S600.06
PARCEL SERVICES
m
X
Z
bd
>7
1
v
nD KC 9199 - JT DIST YCRKINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/25/92 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
--•---••- -------- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - --•--•---- -•— —• --
CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92 POSTING DATE 07/01/92
WARRANT N09
VEADOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
12.12E9
VLR SCIEATIFIC
$41903010
LAB SUPPLIES
123270
VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO
$19916.63
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
123271
VALUEYARE
1189*10
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
123272
VANIER RUSINESS FORMS
S695.15
OFFICE SUPPLIES
123273
VARIAK AAALYTICAL INSTRUMEATS
$39506097
LAB SUPPLIES.
12:274
VARIER ACCLS7ICS9 INC9
$510974
BUILDING MATERIALS
123275
VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPFLY
S36.03
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
123276
CARL .WARREN s CO
$314018
INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR_..._
123277
K.H. kATTS CO
S363.39
ELECTRIC PARTS
123278
WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY
1299435944
CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90
123279
YESCC
- S34014
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
123280
RCURKE 6 ►CODRUFF 9 CR
S839512913
LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92
123281
XEROX CORP
$19248*08
COPIER LEASES
123282
GEORGE YARDLEY CO
S176.71
VALVES
123283
RAY S YCLNG
$59000*00
DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
123284
RICHARD E ECGAR
S200900
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/01/92
S593239926.60
SUMMARY
#1 OPER FUND
#2 CAP FAC FUND
#2 OPER FUND
#2 CAP FAC FUND
#3 OPER FUND - —
#3 CAP FAC FUND
#5 OPER FUND
--#5 CAP PAC FUND..-..-- --- -
#6 OPER FUND
#7 OPER FUND
- #7 CAP FAC FUND —
#11 OPER FUND
#14 OPER FUND
- #5&6 -OPER- FUND- - -
#5&6 CAP -PAC FUND
#6&7 OPER FUND
-- #7&14 OPER FUND -----
JT OPER FUND
CORP
- -SELF- •FUNDED-- INSURANCE FUNDS
JT WORKING CAPITAL
AMOUNT
$1,512.89
$109,269.13
$5,165.99
$700.43
$20,624.46
$147,934.80
$6,524.55
$178,635.57
$417.96
$19,683.90
$33,256.38
$926.99
$954,131.81
$1,109.71
$14.98
$2,263.66
_ $5,541.13
$1,114,606.29
$2,392,924.95
.$153,223.35
$176,468.67
$5,323,.926.60 .._ _
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 7/09/92 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
_
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PA1C
07/15/92 POSTING DATE
07/15/92
WARRANT N0.
_.. VENDOR
AMOUNT _
DESCRIPTION
123311
NAG SYSTEMS
$649073
INSTRUMENT PART
123312
AG TECH COMPANY _.
$629894@07
RESIDUALS REMOVAL-M.0.10-9-91------ ---
123313
ACX COOPCOA71CK
$19884.98
GAUGE
123314
ASTM
S5.00
PUBLICATION
_423315_
_.._ RP..-ADAMS_. COMPANY .......... _
$10826.70 .
- - FLANGE -- - -- --------- -- ---
123316
ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC
S195739214.00
CONSTRUCTION P1-34-3, P1-35-2
123317
AIR PROOLCTS 6 CHEMICAL IN
S339630.00
O&M AGREEMENT O%Y GEN SYST. M.0.8-9-89
- 123318
_. ALTA -? RCEE1hS _.. -.__ .._. _ ..
S493.10
INSTRUMENT .SUPP.LIES-._ .._--
123319
ALTSCPUL ERCLF CCRP
$231.00
PUBLICATION
123320
ACOROIA BENEFIT SERVICES
$149000.00
ANNUAL AGGREGATE PREMIUM
-123321
1NSTI.TUTE-Dom_..___..__. __ _..
. _ _.. S45.00._. :.
_._.__.._-_.._. -PUBLICATION.._--.-
123322
AMERICAN PEDIA INC
S393.95
PUBLICATION
123323
RCRCO INC I/CR AMERICAN SEALS
S988.28
HARDWARE
_ .123324._ .- .....
___._ AMERICAN . SIGF!A _........ _......_._
$1@508.49
INSTRUMENT PARTS-_.-�__--_-.-.-_-_-_-_
123325
ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION
$109750.00
MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS DIST 2
123326
SLAKE P ANDERSON
S92.08
CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT
-123322___--
..ANTHCSY!S_.rECH.R-AACHINE"NC..-._-__
...___... __..i42.7.50_--_.
_.._._.. -_-___-MECHANICAL_ REPAIRS_--
m
123328
A-PLLS SISTEPS
$19907819
NOTICES & ADS
X
123329
ARATEX SERVICES INC
S69538.76
UNIFORM RENTALS
=
-_123339--- •._.
___.ARIZONA._ INSTRUMENT-__.- .. .-- _ _.. _.
S101.25
__-._ .INSTRUMENT PARTS..-..-----.
'--- '
123331
ARK TECHNOLOGIES
$19920.00
CONSULTING SERVICES
123332
ARROM TRLCK BODIES 9 EQUIP
S19284.38
TRUCK PARTS
_123331._. __..-_._ART_._kORKS__-_....-.--._--.T_.____--.._--.
_ _
..._.._. __ _ .. $197.34.-_------..----_--_-.---PHOTO_ PROCESSING.-�----.. -
1233:4
DENTAL INSURANCE CONSULT.
S24.00
DENTAL INSURANCE CONSULTANT
bti
123335
RALPH W ATKINSON
$146.47
PUMP PARTS
BFI PORTABLE SERVICES... __
310T.25
EQUIPMENT RENTALS-_.__._._____._
-123336 _ ....
123337
___
BRW SAFETY i SUPPLY
._
STT7.90
__ _.-
SAFETY SUPPLIES.
123338.
BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE
S32.00
BACKFLOW TESTING
__1233E9 _ '___....__BALL
I4_CCSSTRLCTICH_CO. _..-.
_._ _.A79535.00___._. _
___...._ - MANHOLE ADJUETIHO-DIST_S._-_
123340
BANANA ELLEPRINT
$69461.97
BLUEPRINTING M.O.10-10-90
123341
BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS
$52.21
PUBLICATION
--123342-_..--..._....BAT_TERY
SPECIALTIES
S681.25._
__-_--- BATTERIES.__-_-..-•-_----
123343
BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC
S49849.27
LAB SUPPLIES
123344
BAYLESS SYA71CNERS
$25.98
OFFICE SUPPLIES
_-123345- _._
_ ..- DCA C.BEATTIE.P.E. ._
5800.00 ._ _..
_..___ -ENGINEERING_ SERVICES
123346
ROBERT BE IN WILLIAM FROST
S273.60
ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-34
123347
BELL SECURITY
S106.69
SAFETY CONSULTATION SERVICES
123348
J . 6 H SERGE INC
$82.69
_ _. ___._.LAB SUPPLIES
123349
BCEHRINGEP MANNHEIM
S497.64
LAB-
123350
BCISE CASCACE CFC PRCCUCTS
$249933
OFFICE SUPPLIES
123351
BCN-A-RUES
$483988
TRUCK PARTS
123352
BONNEVILLE EQUIP INC
$250000
DOCUMENT RESEARCii
123353
PRENNER-FIEDLER 6 ASSOC IN
S267.70
COMPRESSOR
123J54
BRITHINEE ELECTRIC.
$19006.39
ELECTRIC MOTOR
123355
BUILCEROS EMPCRIUM
S27.66
HARDWARE/LUMBER
1233E6
GARY G STREED
$39256.29
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
G \
i
FUND NO 9199
JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 7/09/92 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CCUNTY
SANITATICN
DISTRICTS OF CRANGE
COUNTY - •--- --
CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92
POSTING DATE
07/15/92
WARRANT NO.
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
123357
BUTLER PIPER CCPPAAY
$79694.79
OFFICE SUPPLIES
1233ES
CEM CCRPCRATION
S80555.71
LAB SUPPLIES
123359
CH2M HILL
i59215.35
ENGINEERING SERVICES
123360
SUMMIT SOLUTIONS• INC
$456944
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
123361
CS COMPANY
$59.47
VALVE
123362
CAL -CLASS FOR RESEARCH IAC.
$814.59
LAB SUPPLIES
1233E3
CALTROL INC
$39295.13
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
123364
CAPITAL WESTWARD
S254.08
REGULATOR PARTS
123365
CENTURY SAFETY INST R SUPP
$19259.13
SAFETY SUPPLIES
123366
CHEVRON LSA INC
S59940.07
LUBE OIL
123367..._
CI60 BELLA
S355.56
DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE
123368
CLEVELAND COTTON PROD
S187.83
LAB SUPPLIES
123369
COMPUSA9 INC.
$29291.80
COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE
123370 -
COMPUSERVE
112.69
COMPUTER SERVICES
123371
CONNELL CM PARTS I DIV
S376.41
TRUCK PARTS
123372
CONSCLICATED ELECTRICAL CIST
S59021.62
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
--- 123373----.---_.._...CCATIAEATAL
AIR .. TOCLS 1NC. - ..
S39549.09
TOOLS
m
X
123374
CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO
S29424.38
CHLORINE
123375
CONTRACTOROS BOOK STORE
S197.50
PUBLICATION
---123376
CONTROL CATA CCRP d/OR
S935.50
INSTRUMENT
tXJ
123377
CCCPER INEUSTRIES INC
S975.68
COMPRESSOR PARTS
123378
CCUNTY LhCLESALE ELECTRIC
S126.96
ELECTRIC PARTS
- _123379
CRISP PUBLICATIONS9 INC
S501.50
PUBLICATION
123380
CROWN FENCE CO
S39336.00
FENCING
I�
123381
CRYSTAL CLEAR ►INDOW PAINT.
$29250@00
NCLEANING
(V
•• 123382
STATE BCAFC CF EGLILIZATICA
S385.27
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEES _
123383
STATE WATER RESCLRCES CCNTRCL
$39.09
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK CLEANUP FEES
123384
DAILY PILCT
$95.00
NOTICES & ADS
123385
DANIELS TIRE SERVICE
S29371.55
TIRES
123386
DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO
S144.84
VALVE PARTS
123387
DIALCG IAFORYATION SERVICES
S84014
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
123388
DIATEC EKVIRCKMERTAL
$39721.14
CHEMICALS
123389
DIETERICF - POST CO
$68.57
OFFICE SUPPLIES
123390
DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES
S39354@27
PRINTING
123391
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP
52897D3.08
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
123392
SYCON CCPP
S146.93
PRINTING SUPPLIES'_
123353
DICNEX CORP.
$19036.95
LAB SUPPLIES
_ 123344
DCRACC EDTERFRISES INC
S924.82
PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS -_
123395
ROBERT F ORIVER ASSOC
S1149271.00
INSURANCE POLICIES
123396
DUNN EDWARDS CORP
S59727.56
PAINT SUPPLIES
123397
D'VALS SALES
$578.85
FITTINGS
123398
DYRALCO CCN7RCLS
$39306.48
INSTRUMENT PARTS
123359
EPA SERVICES INC
S39684.76
ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-44, J-23-2
123400
EASTPAN INC
S49171.15
OFFICE SUPPLIES
123401
EBERHARD EQUIPMENT
S60.68
TRUCK'PARTS
123402
EXCELLENCE IN TRAINING
S333.00
TRAINING REGISTRATION
FUND AC 9199 - JT GIST WCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/09/92 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - -------
CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING DATE 07/15/92
WARRANT NC. VENCCR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION -
1234U3 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S239178.70 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M-0.10-9-91
123404 JOHN B FALKENSTEIN PE $39400000 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16-,__ _
123405 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP $221.00 AIR FREIGHT
123406 FERRELLEAS 8140.33 PROPANE
012340 . __ ._ ... ._FILTER SIFPLY CC__._ . _ _ . _ S264.79 MECHANICAL PARTS
123408 FISCFER 9 PCR7ER CO S817.54 CHLORINATION PARTS
123409 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO S29466.78 LAB SUPPLIES
123410 .. FLO-SYSTEMS S199369.C8 PUMP PARTS
123411 CLIFFCRD A FORKERT S109036.02 SURVEY SERVICES M.0.6-12-91
123412 FCUNTAIR VALLEY CAMERA $38.40 FILM
123413_. .. _..___..-FCX.INDLSTRIAL.SOLES S19631.45 PAINT SUPPLIES
123414 CITY OF FULLERTCN S81.38 WATER USE
123415 GANAHL LUMBER CO $140008 BUILDING MATERIALS
123416 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY S19454.63 CHEMICALS
123417 GENERAL ELECTRIC CC $580.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
123418 GENERAL TELEPHONE CC $383.30 TELEPHONE SERVICES
rn .___12341L__.._. .-_ GIERLICkeM17CPELL . IAC. S5*884.85 MECHANICAL PARTS___-
X 123420 GRAPHIC CCNTRCLS $471.54 OFFICB SUPPLIES
123421 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $202900 FILM
r--� - 123422 OCN..GREEM 6 ASSOCIATES S59870000 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 _
W 123423 HB TYPE S GRAPHICS S266.42 PRINTING
~ 123424 HARBCLR ENGINEERING $89678.00 PUMP PARTS
123425.. _. HARRINGTCA IAOUS7RIAL _PLASTI S3*204.49 VALVES
bd 123426 HATCH & KIRK INC $19016.18 MECHANICAL PARTS -
1 123427 PL HAWN CO INC S47.41 FILTER
w 123428 HILTI INC - S810.01 FITTINGS
123429 HCERBIGER CVS CALIF INC S270.24 FILTERS
1234:0 J.T. PORVATh 6 ASSOC. $29887.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17
__.123431 _. RS HUGHES CC INC $570.04 - PAINT SUPPLIES
123432 HUNTER CORPORATION S7869494.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1
1234:3 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA S68.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES
123434 HUNTINGTCN SUPPLY $49.88 HARDWARE
123435 HLNTINGTCN VALLEY SCHNINN C S29508995 BICYCLE PARTS
123436 I.G. 1NCUSTRIAL CORP. S19298.16 CHEMICALS
123437 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $399236943 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O_.1.1-14-90
123438 INDUSTRIAL FILTER FFGS $583.69 FILTERS
123439 INDUSTRIAL ThREACED PRCCLC7S S19278.80 CONNECTORS
123440 INCRAF PAFER $19851936 OFFICE SUPPLIES
123441 INLANC EFFIRE WHITE• GHC 8459567.04 TRUCKS M.O.4-8-92
123442 INTERMOUNTAIN SCIENTIFIC CORP S39720.74 SAFETY SUPPLIES
123443 INSTRUMENT SPECIALISTS S99182.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
123444 INTERSTATE BATTERY SVSTEFS $29599@54 BATTERIES
123445 IRVINE RRNCh WATER CISTRIC7 S84.66 WATER USE
12'3446 GREAT LEE7ERN SANITARY SUPP $39098932 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES _
123447 JAYIS CATERING S19,052.30 DIRECTORS' MEETING E%PENSB*
123448 JENSEN TOOLS INC 8718.14 TOOLS
s
rn
x
2
J.
.� hC 9 99 -
1
J T DIET 1iCRK1hG CAPITAL
PROCESSING OATS 7/09/92 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
- -
COUNTY
SANITATION
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING DATE
07/25/92
WARRANT NC.
VEhCCR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
123449
JOHN STONE SUPPLY
S578.60
ELECTRIC PARTS
123450 :
KAR PRODUCTS
S46.47
FITTINGS _..... _.....
123451
THE KEITN CCMPANIES
S954.90
ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35 & 5-36
123452
KING BEARING IRC
S2936R.57
MACHINE SUPPLIES
1234'3- --
KACX IACL:TRIAL SUFRLIES
449020.73
TOOLS
123454
MARTIN KCRCICK SR
$29941.10
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9
123455
LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO
$426.65
CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
123456
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO
$45.53
SAFETY SUPPLIES _
1234E7
LAB SUPPORT
S496ROoDO
TEMPORARY SERVICES
12345E
LAY CFFICES OF RCBERT L LAVOIE
$528929
LEGAL SERVICES - FLORES V. DALEY
-1234°5 ..
LEE61RO SFELVIhG 9 FILE SYS.
$68.33
OFFICE SIIPPyIES..
123460
LIEBERT CCRPCRA71ON
$59.88
BATTERIES
123461
MDS AUTOMATION CONTROLS
S296.32
METER
123462.
MPS
$385.41
PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
123463
MACOPCO
$372.45
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
123464
MAGNETEK RATIONAL ELECTRIC
$29659.64
PUMP REPAIRS
1234E5--- .-_....
MAINTENANCE FRCCLC7S _-IhC
$81040694
MECHANICAL PARTS Y
123466
MARVAC ELECTRONICS
$35.01
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
123467
DON MAURER
S29125.00
OCEAN MONITORING
123468 -. .-MC
FADDEN DALE HARDWARE CO
S61.87
MACHINE SUPPLIES
123469
MEASUREMEhl CONTROL SYS INC
S144.00
INSTRUMENT PARTS
123470
PICRCAGE CF CERRITCS
S243.13
OFFICE FURNITURE
123471
PIC6AY PVC 9 PACHINIhG
$29779.95
PUMP PARTS__-__ .
123472
MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL FRES.
S33.55
OFFICE SUPPLIES
123473
MISCO
$44.84
LAB SUPPLIES
123474
MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO
$452.00
ELECTRIC PARTS V
123475
MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES
$19045000
LAB SERVICES
123476
MCTICK IhCUSTRIES INC
$567.66
HARDWARE
123417
NA7ICRIL ACACEMY FRESS
$66.17
PUBLICATION
123478
NA7IChAL SAFETY COUNCIL
$69.35
SAFETY FILM RENTAL
123479
NEW BRUNSWICK SCIENTIFIC
S414.10
LAB SUPPLIES
123480
NEWARK ELECTRONICS
S633.04
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
123481
CITY OF REWPCRT BEACH
$5.43
WATER USE
123482
NCVA P06EP IhC
829223.00
CONTRACT SERVICES
12:4E3
OFFICE FAVILICKIIN7ERICR RES
9871.4E
OFFICE FURNITURE
123484
THE CHPART CORP
$1*152.96
INSTRUMENT PARTS
123485
DX SYSTEMS CO
$219001.49
CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91
123486
ORANGE CCLNTY CHEMICAL CO
$791051
CHEMICALS
123467
CRANCE CCLNTY FARM SUPPLY C
S19014e16
TOOLS
12348B
CRANCE VALVE 9 F1171NG CC.
$19446.60
FITTINGS
123489
CSCARIS LCCK & SAFE
$60.34
KEY CABINET A_ -
123490
OXYGEN SERVICE
$29566.56
SPECIALTY GASES
123491
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
S69093.47
REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP
123492
PSOCIPOCL SUFPLY OF OCI
S44.64
BLEACH
123493
PSSI
S1r254.40
_
T.V. SEWER SERVICES
123494
PACIFIC FARTS
$89058.37
INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
FUND NO 9199
- JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 7/09/92 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY
SANITATION
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY --.-- .-.-
CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING DATE
07/15/92
WARRANT N09
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION ---..
123495
PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO
$29179.33
SAFETY SUPPLIES
12395E
PACIFIC FELL
S13934
TELEPHONE SERVICES
123497
PAGENET
S54.00
PAGER RENTALS
123498
PALMIER]• TYLER9 WIENER•
$1953 4.23
LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELLS
PARKSON CCRPCRATION.__
$49611049
PLUMBING SUPPLIES. -- ...___..----_-__
123500
PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION
S730942
LAB SUPPLIES
123501
PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC
$1129587*55
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91
_..123502....._• _ - ...
PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE
S76.26
HARDWARE
123503
POLYPURE INC
$159535.09
CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
123504
POWER TRACK INC
$36964
PUMP PARTS
_ .123505...... _-._
_._ .-PRECISICN . INCUSTRIES
S39089.79
HARDWARE
1235CE
HARCLC FFIMRCSE ICE
S2R7.00
ICE
123507
THE PROJECT SCLUTIONS CO.
$49720*00
INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91
123508.
AQUA-CHEM* INC
S542.13
INSTRUMENT PARTS _•
123509
RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS
S317.53
ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR
123510.
STEVE P9 FADOS9 INC9
11169588.00
CONSTRUCTION 14-1-lA-2
m
.. -_123511... -:
RAINECW EISFCSAL CC
S19430.09
TRASH REMOVAL
X
123512
RAM SYS7EM TECHNCLOGIES INC
S214.42
PUBLICATION
=
123513
RAININ INSTRUMENT C099 INC
$194967
LAB SUPPLIES
�
123514
RED WING SHOES
$245.67
REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES _
123515
REOI EXPPESS
S69.30
COURIER SERVICES
--�
123516
REMECY TEMP
$710040
TEMPORARY SERVICES
123517
REMOTE PETER RESE77ING SYST
S59000.00
POSTAGE METER RENTAL._-_
123518
MCJUNKIN-REPUELIC SUPPLY
S79636.52
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
V1
123519
RENOLD INC.
S44.2J
MECHANICAL PARTS
-_123520
J R ROBERTS CORM
5769517.00
CONSTRUCTION J-23-1 _ ,•____
123521
RYAN-HERCC
$19073*03
FITTINGS
123522
JCSEPH 7 RYERSCN I SCN IN
$39344*57
METAL
...123523
SAF71KIFE INC
S614.45
ELECTRIC PARTS -
123524
SAFETY-KLEEN COFP.
$161950
PARTS CLEANER
123525
SAFETY SUPPLY OF AMERICA
1209.52
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
123526
SANCCN ENGINEERING INC
$600*00
MANHOLE REPAIRS DIST 7 - --
123527
SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS
$514.84
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
123528
SCIENCE AFPLICAlIONS INT9L
5879778.0E
OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-12-91
123529
SCCTT SPECIALTY GASES INC
$308099
SPECIALTY GASES
123530
SEA -BIRD ELECTRONICS INC
S382.00
LAB SUPPLIES
123531
SEA- COAST DESIGNS
S70.94
OFFICE MACHINE
123512
SERPENTIR CCNVEYCR CORP
S278999
MECHANICAL PARTS _
1235'3
SFAMRCCK SUFFLY
$19709.69
TOOLS & HARDWARE
123534
ShAS7A ELECTRIC
$29500900
ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS - LAB
123535
SHIP 8 SHORE SHEETMETAL
1482.20
ELECTRICAL PARTS
123536
SHIVA CORP
S19709.00
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
123537
SHURELUCK SALES
1428.24
HARDWARE
123538
SIGMA CFEPICAL CO
$94.16
LAB SUPPLIES _
1235:5
SMITH-EMEFY CC
S29655.00
SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91
123540
SMITH PIFE S SUPPLY INC
S12912
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
t 1
F ti0 NC 9199
- JT DIST W(RKINC CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 7/09/92 PAGE G
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CCUNTY SANI7ATICN
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY _.._
CLAIMS PAID
07/15/92 POSTING DATE
07/15/92
WARRANT NO.
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
123541
SCUTFERN CALIF EOISON CO
$26s851.94
POWER
123542
SO CALIF EDISON CC
$105*790.83
POWER
123543
SO CAL GAS CO
S109223.28
NATURAL GAS
123544
SO CALIF WATER CO
S38.67
WATER USE
-.123545-
SOUTHERN COUNTIES CIL CC
$452.62
DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL
123546
SP4RKLE7TS DRINKING WATER
S29945.39
DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTAL
123547
STAMEN 2 SFASSCFF FE
S19400000
ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.3-11-92
123548
WESTALLCY INC
$189.43
WELDING SUPPLIES
123549
SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC
S476.85
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
123550
SUMMIT STEEL
$555099
METAL
123551
SUPELCO .INC -
$19368078
LAB SUPPLIES
123552
SUPER CHEF CCRP
$379.87
CHEMICALS
1235°3
SLFER FC&ER FRCCUCTS
S19034.40
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
123554
T 6 M CCNIRACT GLAZING
S957.00
GLASS
123555
TAYLOR-DUNN MFG COMPANY
$19321.12
ELECTRIC CART PARTS
123556
TAYLOR INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE
S29910.01
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
123'_57
THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
S215.11
MACHINE SUPPLIES
123558
TRAFFIC CCNTRCL SERVICE INC
$868.47
SAFETY SUPPLIES
123559
TRAVEL TRAVEL
$69664000
TRAVEL SERVICES
123560
TRUCK 6 AUTC SUPPLY INC
S612.82
TRUCK PARTS
123561
TUSTIN DODGE
S68.79
TRUCK PARTS
123562
TWINING LABORATORIES OF
$50455075
LAB SERVICES
123563
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
$388.56
PARCEL SERVICES
123564
UNITED SLATES ELEVATOR CORP
S543.22
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
123565
VLR SC1EAlIFIC
$29948.81
LAB SUPPLIES
123566
VALIN CCRPORATION
S564.24
REGULATOR PARTS
123567
VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO
$29766.46
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
123568
VAN WATER 6 ROGERS
$19286.75
CHEMICALS
123569
VANIER BUSINESS FORMS
$29924.77
PRINTING
123570
VARIAN AKILYTICAL INSTRUMENTS
S29306.78
LAB SUPPLIES
123571
VERTEX SYSTEMS
3129147.25
OFFICE EQUIPMENT/COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
123572
VILLAGE NURSERIES
$21.44
LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
123573
VOLLER• SAVAGE & ASSOC
S431.25
INSURANCE & RISK MANAGEMENT CONSULTING_
123574
WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY
1339360.75
CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90
123575
WES71N ENGINEERING
S10o967.50
ENGINEERING SERVICES
123576
WFSTRUX INTERNATIONAL
S413.53
TRUCK PARTS
123577
kCRTFINCTCN FCRD
$869452.17
TRUCKS M.0.4-8-92
123578
XEROX CCRP
S9s535.14
COPIER LEASES
123579
ZIEBARTH AND ALPF.R
-----------------
$669801.00
_
CONSTRUCTION P1-34-i
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92
-----------------
S399149161.37
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 07/09/92 PAGE-7-
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
- CLAIMS PAID 07/15/92 POSTING DATE 07/25/92 - ---- -
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND -- ---_ ___ _ $142.28-
#1 CAP FAC FUND $127,140.50
#2 OPER FUND $15,166.60
#2 CAP FAC FUND $573.37 - _-- - -----_---
#3 OPER FUND $17,123.89
#5 OPER FUND $14,897.79
#5 CAP FAC FUND __-_ .. _-•- ._-. _ - ._ _. $2, 714.38
#6 OPER FUND $99.65 - -
#7 OPER FUND $3,859.83
#7 CAP PAC FUND $583.98 - - - - -- --- - ---
#11 OPER FUND $8,159.00
#13 OPER FUND $24.19
#14 OPER FUND - - $58.19
x #24 CAP FAC'FUND $9,911.26
_ #5&6 OPER FUND $1,917.20
�-� #7&14 OPER FUND $22.08
JT OPER FUND $754,027.41
CORP $2,737,571.94
SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS -- $57,420.7E
w JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $172,757.07
I--------------
v $3,914,162.37
eae�aaaaaae�a=
i
FORD NO
9199 - JT DIST LCPKIKG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92
WARRANT.NC. V£RDOR
123601
AG TECH C CMPA NY
123602
ASR ANALYSIS
123603
A T 9 T
123604
AMERICAR IELEPHORE & TELEGRAPH
1236E5
A T S T
1236L6
ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC
123607
ACTION RENTALS
123608
ADVANCED CCOLING TECHNOLOGIES
123609
AIR PHCTC SERVICES
123610
AIR FRCCLCTS & CHEMICAL IR
123611
- ALPHAGAZ
123612
AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH
123613
AMERICAN MEDIA INC
123614
ROBCO IRC 11CR AMERICAN SEALS
123615
AMERICAR TYPE CULTURE COLLECIK
123616
CHARLES E. ANDERSON
123617
ANGEL SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS
123618
ANIXTER - DISTRIBUTICN
123619
A -PLUS SISTEMS
123E20
ABC LABCRAICRIES
123621
AQUATIC TESTING LABORATORY
123622
ARATEK SERVICES INC
123623
ARIZONA INSTRUMENT
123624
ART LORKS
123625
ASSCCIAIEC DIESEL
123626.
ASSOC. AOFINIS. & CORSULTARTS
123627
BKK LANDFILL
123628
BRW SAFETY & SUPPLY
123629 -.
.B BATEMAK
123620
BATTERY SFECIAL71ES
123631
BAXTER CIACKOSTICS IRC
123632.
BAYLESS STATIONERS
123633
J & H BERGE INC
123634
BOYLE EREINEERIKG CORP
-.123635
BRENKER-FIEOLER I ASSOC IR
12!6'.6
OLCGET vARITCPIAL
123637
BUILDEROS EMPORIUM
.123638
BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC
123639
GARY G $TREED
123640
BUTLER PAPER COMPARY
.123641
SLMMIT SCILTICRS• INC
123642
CS C CMPA RY
123643
CARLETON ENGINEERS
.123644
JOHN CARCLLO EKGINEEP.S
123645
CHARLES L CARTER CO
12364E
DICK CEPEK IRC
AMOUNT
DESCR IPT ION
$669588.85
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
S880.00
ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS - -
S39246.20
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
S19504.01
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
S513.69
LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES -•- ----
S50.00
LAB SERVICES
S19785.00
RENTAL EQUIPMENT
S451.41
ELECTRIC PARTS
5280.1E
AERIAL PHOTOS
S169815.00
0&M AGREEMENT O%Y. GEN SYST M.0.8-9-89
$882.56
SPECIALTY GASES
S75.00
SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS
S48.95
VHS TAPE PREVIEWS
S 72 7.31
PUMP PARTS
S508.25
LAB SUPPLIES
S275.00
MACHINE REPAIRS
$19036.59
LAB SUPPLIES
S502.04
COMPUTER PARTS
$39342.66
NOTICES & ADS
S29165.00
LAB SERVICES
$500.00
LAB SERVICES
$49288.57
UNIFORM RENTALS
$482.99
INSTRUMENT PARTS
S106.03
AWARDS FRAMING
$672#60
ENGINE PARTS
S270.00
MEDICAL INSURANCE ,APKI ISTRATtON_
S289524.13
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
S58.19
SAFETY SUPPLIES
$600.00
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION _...
S260.47
BATTERIES
$79787.92
LAB SUPPLIES
$94.52
OFFICE SUPPLIES._..
S218.87
LAB SUPPLIES
S339260.69
ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-30
$19836.54 .
COMPRESSOR ._., -_ ____
$137.50
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
S66.42
HARDWARE/LUMBER
$1072.00
SURVEY SERVICES M.0.6-12-91
S4*646.84
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
$208.33
OFFICE SUPPLIES
S49180@37
SERVICE AGREEMENT
$49466.62
VALVES
S187.5G
ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.5-9-90
$1299556.06
ENGINEERING SERVICES J-20, P2-43, P1-34
$188.61
TRUCK PARTS
S166.10
TRUCK PARTS
m
X
S
to
C)
1
N
FUND NC 9199 - JT DTST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CCUNTY SANI7ATICN DISTRICTS OF CRANGE COUNTY - -
CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION -•
123647 ChEVRCN LSA INC $39303090 OIL & GREASE
123648 CCASIAL CFLCRIKATIOK $39420.00 WATER SYST. CHLORINATION _.
123649 CCLICh ANC SCNS S292759075.00 CONSTRUCTION I-9
123650 COMPUSA♦ INC. S59ijS5.70 COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE
123651. COMPUSERVE S26.27 COMPUTER SERVICES
1236E2 CONNELL CM PARTS / DIV $43.70 TRUCK PARTS
123653 COKSCLICAIEC ELECTRICAL LIST S89248.22 ELECTRIC PARTS
123654 CCNTAINERIZED CHEMICAL DISPO $69294.75 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL
123655 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC $331.82 TOOLS
123656 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO S1*616.25 CHLORINE M.0.9-9-91
1236E7 CCNTINEN70L GRAPHICS S590.13 PRINTING
123658 CCCPER INCUS7RIES IKC i1IP049.71 COMPRESSOR PARTS
12!EE9 CCCRCINA7EC EGLIF CC IKC S375.00 MACHINE PARTS
123660 CCSTA MESA AUTC SUPPLY slou21l.38 TRUCK PARTS _ _...
123661 R E COULTER CRANE RENTAL S666.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
123662 COUNCIL OF BIOLOGY EDITORS $60.90 PUBLICATIONS
123603 STATE CF CALIFCRNIA 5876.55 PROCUREMENT FEES - VEHICLES-•.._•,___�_` _
123664 STATE CF CALIFCRNTA S157.50 HAZARDOUS WASTE TAX
1236E5 STATE CF CALIFCRKIA $321.24 DIESEL USE FEES
123666 DAMES 8 CCCRE S24v175.92 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-3
123667 PETER C DAVID CO S1679383.50 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2
123668 DE ANZA CORPORATION S150.DO EQUIPMENT RENTAL
123669 HSK/DECKER S319.97 INSTRUMENT PARTS _-
123670 DEZURIK AND/CR CS CO $29721951 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
123671 _ DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CCRP S99588.68 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
123672 DORADO ENTERFPISES INC $100.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS
123673 ROBERT F DRIVER ASSOC $6459169.00 PROPBRTX INSURANCE M.O-f-8-92"
123674 DUNN EDLARDS COOP $79322.99 PAINT SUPPLIES
.123675..._ __ EAS7PAN INC _ S59113.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES __
12367E ECOANALYSIS INC $49090.34 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.1-17-91 r __
123677 ELECTRO-•TEST INC $39258.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
123678 ELECTRO NUMERICS INC $164009 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
123679 ENCHANTER INC $79280.00 OCEAN MONITORING H.0.7-17-91
123680 EIT S260.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS
__123681.__ .._ ERVIRCNMEN7AL PRCC. USA S99686.T3 TRUCK PARTS _ ._ __ __• •____�
123662 ENVIRCNPENTAL RESOURCE ASSCC S646.50 LAB SERVICES
123683 MARSHALL FAT RRES 5178.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
123684.._ FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S179041.22 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M-0.10-9-91
123685 JOHN B FALKENSTEIN FE $39400.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16
123666 FAN PRESS $54.51 OFFICES SUPPLIES
12368.7_ FEDERAL EMPRESS CCRF $336.75 AIR FREIGHT
123688 CHEMYEST INC S749.94 SCRUBBER PARTS
123689 FISCHER B PORTER CO S39233.10 CHLORINATION PARTS
_.123690 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO S370.44 LAB SUPPLIES �.-__,______•_
123691 FLO-SYSTEPS 54iP818.73 PUMP PARTS
123692 FCRBES CCMPUTER GROUP INC 580.00 FREIGHT
�...,
�
NO 9199
- JT GIST WORKING AP A
C IT L
PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY
SANITATION
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE
07/29/92
WARRANT NO..
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
123693
FOUNTAIN .VALLEY CAMERA
$50.09
FILM
123694
FCUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT
S851.55
PAINT SUPPLIES
123695
FCX ENIEPPRISES
$19825@00
SAFETY CONSULTANT
123696
FOX INDUSIRIAL SALES
S36.85
ELECTRIC PARTS
123697
FRANCE COMPRESSOR PRODUCT
$139716.57
COMPRESSOR PARTS
123698
BUD FREY
$71.16
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION _
123699
GANAHL LIPBER CO
919634.59
HARDWARE
123700
GATES FIEERGLASS IRSTALLERS
S79500.00
FIBERGLASS REPAIRS
1237E1
GENERAL CCEAhICS9 INC.
$283.37
LAB SUPPLIES
123702
GENERAL IELEPHONE CO
$49233.98
TELEPHONE SERVICES
123703
VITALY GOROOETSKY
$131.72
DEFERRED COMP PAY/OFF-.,
123704
GOVERNMENI INSTIIUTES INC
S69.00
PUBLICATIONS
1237C5
GRAHAM d uAPES
$1*767.42
LEGAL SERVICES M.0.8-14=91'
1237E6
GRAPhIC CISIRIBUICRS
$10146046
FILM
123707
DCh GREEN 6 ASSOCIATES
$199635.00
SURVEY SERVICES M.0.6-12-91
123708
HSQ TECHNOLOGY
$5189400.00
CONSTRUCTION J-23-2 & P2-44
123709 --
HB .TYPE 9 GRAPHICS - - ..
$71.12
__. PRINTING
M
123710
HACH CCMFANY
$29767.26
SAFETY SUPPLIES
X
123711
FRED A FARPER
$19500000
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
=
123712
HARRIhGTCb INDUSTRIAL PLAS71
S497.38
PLU14BING SUPPLIES
123713
HATCP 6 KIRK INC
S159864.69
MECHANICAL PARTS
,-,
123714
HAULAYAY CONTAINERS
$49860600
TRASH REMOVAL
-1
123715
PL HAWN CO INC
-3481.95 _.
___ FILTERS.__
123716
HELLO
S207.09
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
123717
HEWLETT FACKARD CO
S339298.52
LAB EQUIPMENT
W
-123718
HILTI INC _
S673.99
ELECTRIC PARTS
123719
HCEFER SCIENTIFIC INSTR.
S29081995
LAB SUPPLIES
123720
HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC
$19874.68
COMPRESSOR PARTS
-- 123721----.--
-_RC --.HOFFMAN--AND/OR -.ISCO -.---
8239277.23.
SAMPLER
123722
J.T. hORVATH 9 ASSOC.
S39000000
_
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17
123723
RS HLGhES CC INC
$655096
PAINT SUPPLIES
-123724 _
HUhTER CCRPORATION
$309v337.O0
_ _ CONSTRUCTION J-19-_1
123725
HUNTIN670N BEACH RUBBER STA
$232.20
_
OFFICE SUPPLIES - -
123726
HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHYINN C
S387.83
BICYCLE PARTS
-.12372.2.._ -_..._ _-
_.. HURLEV_.. ELECTRONICS _- INC. _. ..._
S23.55 ...
_ __.... ELECTRONICS . SUPPLIES
123728
I C F INC
$50.00
PUBLICATION -
123729
I.G. INCLEIRIAL CCRP.
S29714.47
FERROUS CHLORIDE M.0.4-8-92
1MC INDUSTRIES
S961.80
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
123731
ISCO INC
$169.83
INSTRUMENT PARTS -- - - -
123732
IMPERIAL LEST CHEMICAL
$419459.72
FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-14-90
_.123733__. _
IhCRAC PAFER _
5883.9E
OFFICE SUPPLIES
123734
INLAhC EPFIRE EGLIFYENI CC.
S269260.83
TRUCK M.0.5-14-92 -
123735
INTEHPOUNTAIN SCIENTIFIC CCRP
S59281.91
LAB EQUIPMENT
__.123736_._.. _
INSTRUMENT SPECIALISTS
$39032.5D
INSTRUMENT SERVICES_
123737
INTERCONNECTIONS
S29160.00
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
123736
IBM CORPCRA71ON
S348.00
SERVICE AGREEMENT
n
I
X
FUND NO 9199
- JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY -- ----- • ----•-
CLAIMS
PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE
07/29/92
WARRANT NO.
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
123739
PACTEL TELETRAC
S35.00
TELEPHONE SERVICES
123740
JLA CREDIT CORP
S145932
MICROFICHE READER LEASE ___ •. __._.
123741
GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP
S783901
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
123742
JIPOS SLSFENSICN SERVICE
$50.00
TRUCK PARTS
123743-
JCHNSCN PCWER OF NO.AMERICA
S388.85
MECHANICAL PARTS __.___•- __ _ _ �.____,_
123744
JORDAN CONTROLS INC
$247.73
INSTRUMENT PARTS
123745
KING REAPING INC
$262*78
MACHINE SUPPLIES
123746
KNCS 1NOLSTRIAL SUPPLIES
$19625.71
TOOLS -.__._._...
123747
PAPTIN KCRDICK SR
S29999.20
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9
123748
LAB SUPPORT
S39149.25
LAB SERVICES
123749
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT_L LAVOIE
S50.00
LEGAL, SERVICES.- FLORES__._.•_
123750
LEGI-TECH
S27590C
COURIER SERVICES
1237EI
KP LINDSTROM INC
$69518.80
CONSULTING SERVICE - NPDES
123752
LCRAIN PRCDUCTS
S19251930
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT - RE_LI_AN__C_8_PO_WER
Y _
123753
MPS
58962
CE
PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
123754
MAINFRAME SERVICE INC
S39622.00
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
123755
MANLEYOS BOILER REPAIR C09 INC
S19filfi935
VALVE_-
123756
MANTEK
S19549.99
GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES
1237E7
MATT - CHLOR INC
$19016.00
CHLORINATION PARTS
1237E8..
MCDAIN INSTPVVENTS
S39233.87
INSTRUMENT _... _.._.
1237!9
MCGARRY CERTPAL TYFEWRITER 1
$19564.00
SERVICE AGREEMENTS
123760
MEASUREGUIPMENT INC
S59257900
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
123761
MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL. MARKETS
S309799.52
_ _--_ REMARKETING AGREEMENT
123762
MICROAGE COMPUTER
S19243.43
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
123763
MIDWAY MFG E MACHINING
$39341911
MACHINE REPAIRS
1237E4
MILLIPORE ANC/OP WATERS
_ $937915
_ LAB -SUPPLIES
123765
MILLTRONICS
$240*71
INSTRUMENT PARTS
123766,
MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRESS
$617005
OFFICE MACHINE
-.-123767-.. '___.__.-MITCHELL
PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS
. $659610.00
_ -__ . _ CONSTRUCTION 7-11-2
1237E8
MOTICN INDUSTRIES INC
$23921
HARDWARE
123769
MCTORCLA INC
$132.50
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
.123710 _.,_-
NA7ICNAL IATEP RESEARCH
_
S509000900.
ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION M.0._7-1_7-91 -_
�- --
123771
NEW BRUKS61CK SCIENTIFIC
S123.26
LAB SUPPLIES
123772
NEWARK ELECTRONICS
$245995
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
_-123173-_-
.__.NORCAL ._.CONTROLS -INC.
.-
319170.17 .. ------
MECHANICAL PARTS
--......--- - •--
123774
OI COPPCPATION
S95.25
LAB SUPPLIES
123775
OCCUPATICAAL VISION SERVICES
$925*04
REIMBURSABLE SAFETY GLASSES
12..77E
CFFICE FP%ILICN/INIERICP RES
S793981
OFFICE FURNITURE ._
123777
UM SYSTEMS CO
$149573.17
_
CHLbAiNB H.0.10-9-41.
123778
ON-LINE ELECTRONICS
$105.06
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
.123779 __.� _
ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO*
$19822940
FITTINGS -
123780
CXYGEN SERVICE
$469058
SPECIALTY GASES
123781
CCLN7Y SON17ATICN CISTRIC7
S658976
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
123702. _
CSOCC SELF -FUNDED MEDICAL I
$100*000000
PREMIUM ADVANCE
1237b3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
$149393945
REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE•--- -
123784
PACIFIC PARTS
$212.61
INSTRUMENT PARTS
F11NC NC 9199 -
JT GIST UCRKING CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE
5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
-- ---
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING
DATE 07/29/92
WARRANT NO.
VENDOR AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
m
x
2
C")
I
Vl
123785
PACO PUMPS
123786
PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT
123787
PACIFIC EELL
1237E8
PACIFIC IATER CCNDITICNING
123789
PACTEL MEFIDIAN SYSTEMS
123790
PAK WEST
123791
PARTS UNLIMITED
123792
ROY PENDEPGRAFT
223793
PEPKIN-ELDER CORFORATION
123794
PHCTC & SOLNC CO
123795
PIONEER BANK
123796
PITNEY BODES
123797
POLYFURE INC
123798
PORTER RCILER SERVICE INC
123799
PCST CONSLMER PRCCUCTS
123860
PC�ER ELECTPC SLPPLY CC
123801
POWER SYSTEMS
123802
PRECISION INDUSTRIES
123803
PREMIER PRINTING CORP.
123804 -
HAROLC PRIMROSE ICE
123805
PRCFESSICNAL SERVICE 1ND.
123866
THE PROJECT SCLUTIONS CO.
123801
PULSAFEEDER
123808
AQUA-CHEM9 INC
123809
QUALITY RLILDING SLPPLY
123810
RPM ELECTRIC MCTORS
123811
STEVE P. RADOS9 INC.
123812
RECYC INC
..123813
RED .WING SHOES
123814
REDI
123815
REDI EXPRESS
12ZE1E
RE1SF MARINE STLCIES9 INC
123817
NCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY
123818
PEGGY RUPP
--123819.....
JCSEPH T RYERSON S SCN
123820
SAFT/NIFE INC
123821
SAFETY--KLEEN CCRF
-_123822...
SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS
123823
RICHARD E. SCHLEGEL
123824
SEA COAST DESIGNS
_123825._
SERPEK7IX CCNVEYCR CORP
12362E
SPAMRCCK SCIENTIFIC SPEC SYS
123827
ShAMRCCK SUPPLY
123828
SHASTA ELECTRIC
123829
SHURELUCK SALES
123830
SIGMA CHEMICAL CO
$664043
PUMP PARTS
CO 3249972.22
SAFETY SUPPLIES
S614.16
TELEPHONE SERVICES
C S68.40
RENTAL EQUIPMENT
$55.97
TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
$41.57
JANITORIAL SERVICES
$19433.99
TRUCK PARTS
S460.00
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
S684.74
LAB SUPPLIES
$48.42
OFFICE FURNITURE
$72*779.10
CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-3473
S452.02
POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE
9139500.26
CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.7-17-91
$269.57
PACKING MATERIALS
$89911.98
PRINTING
S901.39
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
$914056
GENERATOR
S19163.46
FITTINGS
S59471.55
PRINTING
$259.00
ICE
S19374.00
SOILS TESTING
S49720.00
INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91
S500.73
PUMP PARTS
$29341.90
_
INSTRUMENT PARTS
$83.72
BUILDING MATERIALS
519666.48
ELECTRIC PUMP REPAIR
$5889268982
CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A-2
S529032.76
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91
S227.57
REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
S 74 3.31
MAP INDEXES
$56.70
COURIER SERVICES
S19063.00
OCEAN MONITORING
$59009.32
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
$540.00
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
IN S349.68
METAL
S282.83
ELECTRIC PARTS
$86.70
PARTS CLEANER
$29046.16
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
S39000000
DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
$109090
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
$29964.04
MECHANICAL PARTS
$412.32
LAB SUPPLIES-
$19057e24
TOOLS
$99700.00
ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
S79466.21
PAINT*SUPPLIES
S361.41
PUBLICATIONS
FUND NO 9199 -
JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY
SANITATION
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY - -.. -.-- --- -
CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE
07/29/92
WARRANT N0.
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION -- -- - -
123831
SILVERI 8 LE BOUEF
S6559011.90
CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3
123832
SMITH-EMEFY CO
S1s610.00
SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 _
123833
SC CCAST AIR QUALITY
$29375.00
PERMIT FEES
1238.4
SCLTf CCAS7 WATER
$87.50
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
123835
SCUTEERN CALIF EDISON CO
$202*331903
POWER
123836
SOUTHERN COUN71ES OIL CO
8109579.33
DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL
123837
SOUVENIR PHOTO
S113.16
PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
123638
WESTALLCY, INC
$338.13
WELDING SUPPLIES
123839
SPECIAL FLASTIC SYSTEMS INC
964.65
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
123840
SFEX INCIS7RIES INC
8527.35
LAB SUPPLIES
123841
SRECC FLEXIBLE
$29662.64
TRUCK PARTS
123842
STATE STREET BANK
S5.325.00
C.O.P. ADMIN FEES
123843
STERLING ART
$47.76
OFFICE SUPPLIES
123844
SUBURBAN FCRD
S409891.65
TRUCKS (3) M.0.4-8-92
123845
SUPMIT STEEL
$276.50
METAL
123846
SLNSET F(RD
$310.08
TRUCK PARTS
123847
SUPER CHEM CORP
S29885.17
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES.
M
123848
SUR-LITE CORPORATION
S21*017.68
WASTE DIGESTER FLARES
=
123849
TAYLOR-DUNN MFG COMPANY
S1.212.51
ELECTRIC CART PARTS
►-;
.- 12.eG0
TEKMAR CCMPANY
S830.36
LAB. SUPPLIB3
W
123851
THE TEXWIPE COMPANY
S95.12
VALVE
123852
CHARLES E 7WFAS
$19373.80
BUILDING REPAIRS
_123853 ._.-._
THCMPSON INOUSTRIAL SUPPLY-
_ 5857.20 ._.
__ _ _ HARDWARE .___,.__------- __._.
(")
123854
TILE MATTERS
S119.72
BUILDING MATERIALS
1
123855
TOYO LANDSCAPING CO
S79986.74
CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.11-13-91
_.123856 _
TRAVEL TRAVEL _._..
S29320.00 _
TRAVEL SERVICES
123857
TRUCK I AUTO SUPPLY INC
$164079
TRUCK PARTS
1238°8
JG TUCKEF 6 SCN INC
S925.14
INSTRUMENT PARTS
-_.123859 -.__ __ __.
DANIEL.TUNNICLIFE _
_ S87.87
_.. DEFERRED COMP-PAY/OFF_-
123860
TUSTIN DODGE
S226.61
TRUCK PARTS
123861
US RENTALS
S2020.00
RENTAL EQUIPMENT
_1238E2.__._
ULTRA SYSTEMS
$19211@40
ENGINEERING SERVICES
123863
UNION BANK
S79290.00
CONSTRUCTION RETENTION-
123864
UNOCAL
S87.23
UNLEADED GASOLINE
-123R65._. _. __._
UNITED_ .. CCNCRETE COMPANIES.
. $376.91 _ _
__ __ CONCRETE
123866
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
S164.20
PARCEL 3BRVICES
123867
UNITED TAPE CORPORATION
$63.19
PUBLICATION
1,238f8__ '. ..__YG/FISIGNE
INSTRUMENTS.
$129000.00
LAB EQUIPMENT
123869
VUR SCIENTIFIC
$39147.40
LAB SUPPLIES
123870
VALLEY C171ES SLPPLY CC
S79322.32
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
_._123871_ -_
VANIER EUSINESS FORMS
$29200962.
_-PRINTING _.
123872
VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS
S19688096
LAB SUPPLIES
123873
VERNEOS PLUMBING
S35.00
PLUMBING SERVICES
__123874_
VERTEX SYSTEMS
$19397.50
COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
123875
VILLAGE NURSERIES
S91.36
LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
123816
VCRTEX IACL'SIRIES
$270.00
DOOR REPAIRS
FUND NO
9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/23/92 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CCUNTY SANITA7ION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92 POSTING DATE 07/29/92
WARRANT NO.
VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
123877
BCB 6ARE PHOTOGRAPHY
$175.00
PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES
123878
CARL WARFEA t CO
$300.00
INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR_.__.__,-._._
123879
WATER EAVIRONMENT FED.
S29225.00
TRAINING REGISTRATION
123880
WESTERN. HIGHWAY PRODUCTS IN
S255.19
SAFETY SUPPLIES
123881
WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY
SIT9526969
CAUSTIC SODA M.P.8-8-90.-
123882
WHATFAN LAB SALES INC
S769.50
LAB SUPPLIES
123883
WILLIAMS R WILKINS
$36.27
LAB SUPPLIES
1238E4
RCURKE I-ICCCRLFF A CR
$799702.90
LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92
123885
GECRGE YARDLEY CC
S59.64
VALVE
123886
YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEMS
S232.56
FREIGHT
123887
RICHARD YOUNG PROD
$29422.63
PRINTING SUPPLIES
123888
CARL ZEISS INC
S159314.65
LAB EQUIPMENT
1238P9
ZIEBARTH I ALPER/C.S. ALPER
S329754.00
CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1
123850
RICHARD E ECEAR
4200.00
-----------------
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
n"I
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/29/92
$69843*037.4U
X
S
SUMMARY
C- )
#1 OPER FUND
�l #1 CAP FAC FUND
#2 OPER FUND .
#2 CAP FAC FUND
#3 OPER FUND
--- #3 -CAP-'FAC FUND_._._
#5 OPER FUND
#5 CAP FAC FUND
-#6 OPER-. FUND _
#7 OPER FUND
#7 CAP FAC FUND
--#11-OPER FUND. _
#13 OPER FUND
#14 OPER FUND
#14-CAP FAC FUND
#5&6 OPER FUND
#6&7 OPER FUND
#7&14 OPER FUND
JT OPER FUND
CORF
-.SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS
JT WORKING CAPITAL
AMOUNT
$4,131.74
$89,493.13
411,728.21 ._ .•
$33,283.62
$42,076.74
$110,405.SO.- _ ..
$7,901.23
$727,843.31
82,160.85.
$74,552.62
$2,657.92-
$615.99
$507,554.07
$3,505.22
$32.49
$6,578.48 _
:1,348,618.71 ..... - ---------------- -
$3,566,669.69
$162,216.51_.-
$135,371.08
$6,843,037.40
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P.O. Box 8127 . 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 42728-8127
Telephone: (714) 462-2411
AGENDA
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 1992 - 7:30 P.M.
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4
A minute excerpt has been received as set forth below. Pursuant
to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and
file said excerpt:
DISTRICT 13
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpt from
the City of Anaheim re appointment of alternate Director, as
follows: (*Mayor)
Active Director Alternate Director
Iry Pickler Fred Hunter*
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
SEPTEMBER 9, 1992
1) CONDOLENCES TO PAT MCGUIGAN ON HER HUSBAND'S DEATH
JAMES D . MCGUIGAN, HUSBAND OF SANTA ANA COUNCIL
MEMBER AND DISTRICT 3 DIRECTOR, PAT MCGUIGAN, PASSED
AWAY ON THURSDAY , SEPTEMBER 3RD . MR. MCGUIGAN
WAS A LONG TIME ORANGE COUNTY ATTORNEY AND ACTIVE
IN LOCAL CIVIC AFFAIRS.
2) PRESENTATION OF 25 YEAR SERVICE PIN TO GARY STREED
- GARY STARTED AS AN ACCOUNTANT IN SEPTEMBER 1967
IN AUGUST 1981 HE WAS PROMOTED TO ACCOUNTING
�.d
SUPERVISOR
- IN SEPTEMBER 1984 GARY WAS APPOINTED CHIEF
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE GENERAL MANAGER
IN OCTOBER 1989 GARY WAS APPOINTED TO HIS
CURRENT POSITION OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
- GARY IS IN CHARGE OF ALL ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
ACTIVITIES, PURCHASING AND WAREHOUSING AND
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SERVICES
- THANKS FOR 25 YEARS OF FINE, DEDICATED SERVICE, GARY
-ITEM 3 ON NEXT PAGE-
A _ i
3)
UPCOMING MEETINGS
�..i A. DISTRICTS 1, 2. 3. 5, 6. 7 and 11 — THE BOARDS OF
DISTRICTS 1, 2. 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 ARE SCHEDULED TO
ADJOURN TO NEXT WEDNESDAY , SEPTEMBER 16 1992 AT
7:30 P.M.,. TO CONSIDER THEIR USER FEES FOR 1992-93
u
B . EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE — THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS
SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY , SEPTEMBER 23RD AT
5:30 P.M.
C . CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE — THE
CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE IS
SCHEDULED TO MEET ON TUESDAY , SEPTEMBER 29TH AT
5:30 P . M .
—END OF REPORT—
04-115
MEETING DATE September 9, 1992 TIME 7:30 P.M. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 & 14
DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS
(RICHARDSON) . GRISET ..... --1!!!0-- - (BEYER) ............... BARRERA ... -
(BEYER) ..... BARRERA .... V000' - (NORBY) ............... CATLIN ....... -
(PONTIOUS) ... SALTARELLI .: (SC(YM ............... COLLINS ... -
(ROTH) ...... STANTON ... (PLUMMER) ............. COX ....... JG -
(FERRYMAN) ... WAHNER (MAIM ................ CULVER ...... -
W-MICT 2 (BELL) ................ DENES .... —
(GULLIXSON) .. WEDAA ....: (RICE) ................ EVNLAP... _ -_
(SCOTT) ..... COLLINS ... (............ FLORA .... �� -
(BEYER) ..... BARRERA .... � (MAHONEY).............. FLORA ... -
�L (MeCUNE) . . GRIFFIN . -
(NORBY) ..... CATLIN ..... (RICHARDSON) ........... GRISET .....
(BELL) ...... DENES ..... -
(WEDAA) .............. GULLUCSON . .
(FLORA) ..... MAHONEY ... (PLUMMER) ............. HART ...... -_
(CULVER) .... MAIN ....... (MacALLISTER) ........... KELLY ...... -
(PARKER) .... NELSON ..... T (FORSYTHE) ............ LASZLO ..... -
(TYNES) ..... NEWTON ... A - (FLORA) ............... MAHONEY .. -
(HUNTER) .... PICKLER ... (CULVER) .............. MAIN ..... ✓ _
(GRISET) ..... PULIDO .... (RICHARDSC............ M"VIWI eN
(ROTH) ...... STANTON ... (HERMAN) ............. MINER...... -
DiSTRICT 3 (PARKER) .............. NELSON ... -
(DOTSON) .... SAPIEN .... ✓ (TYNES) ............... NEWTON ... O1/ -
(NELSON) .... DUNLAP ..... & (DUNLAP) .............. WliSiiii ... -
(NORBY) ..... CATLIN ..... J� _ (AGE) ................ PARTIN .... -
(SCOTT) ..... COLLINS .... v - (HUNTER) .............. PICKLER ... -
(MAIN) ...... CULVER ....... _ (HART) ................ PLUMMER .. -
(RICE) ...... EVANS (PUCKETT) ............. PONTIOUS .. -
(MAHONEY) ... FLORA ...... - (SALTARELL) ............ PUCKETT .... _
(MCCUNE) .... GRIFFIN ..... (GRISET) .............. PULIDO .... -
(FORSYTHE) ... LASZLO .... (PULIDO) .............. RICHARDSON -
(RICHARDSON) . uawm df ... � - (STANTON) ............. ROTH ..... -
(HERMAN) .... MINER ..... (PONTIOUS) ............. SALTARELLI . -
(AGE)....... PARTIN .... (CO)Q ................SANSONE .. -
(HUNTER) .... PICKLER .... (DOTSON) .............. SAPIEN ..... _
(ROBITAILLE) .. SILVA ..... (HAMMOND) ............. SHERIDAN .. -
(ROTH) ...... STANTON .... (ROBITAILLE) ............ SILVA ..... -
(BATES) ..... SYLVIA .... (ROTH) ............... STANTON ... -
DISTRICT 5 .... (MILLER) ............... SWAN .—
(BATES) ............... SYLVIA -
(HART) ...... PLUMMER .... (FERRYMANISHERRICKIREADE) . WAHNER ....
(COX) ....... SANSONE ..(GULLIXSON) ............ WEDAA ..... -
(STANTON) .... ROTH ...... (MOULTON•PATTERSC. ..... WINCHELL ...
DISTRIM
(SHERRICK) ... WAHNER .... STAFF OTHER
(PLUMMER) ... HART .... SYLVESTER ...... WOODRUFF .. ✓
(STANTON) .... ROTH .... BROWN ....... ANWAR .... -
DISTRICT7 ANDERSON ...... DEMIR..... -
(SALTARELLI) .. PUCKETT .... CLAWSON ....... 00' FLEMING .... -
(READE) ..... WAHNER .... DAWES ........ JG HOHENER ... -
(BEYER) ..... BARRERA .... GORCZYCA ...... HOUGH ..... -
(PLUMMER) ... COX ....... HASENSTAB ..... HOWARD .... -
(PULIDO) ..... RK*IARDSCN HODGES ...... HUNT ..... -
(STANTON) .... ROTH ..... KYLE ......... �y KNOPF .....
(HAMMOND) ... SHERIDAN .. LINDER ........ LEE ...... ✓
DISTRICT 11 NELLOR ........ _�L LINDSTROM -
NELSON ....... LYNCH -
(MOULTON- NICHOLS ....... SHAW ......
PATTERSOM .. WINCHELL ... JC/ OOTEN ........ STONE .....
(MacALLISTER) KELLY ...... _,/✓ RENESCU ...... WASON .... -
(ROTH) ...... STANTON ... A/ SIMPSON ....... :,Zoe YOUNG .... A.-�. J
DISTRICT 13 E ...... 'vv~ (WEDAA) ..... aULLU(SON .. VINvINCENT ......:
(BEYER) ..... BARRERA ... WINSOR .......
(DUNLAP) .... AM 066W..... -
(HUNTER) .... PICKLER ... -
(STANTON) .... ROTH ..... -
DISTRICT 14 ✓
(MILLER) ..... SWAN ..... -
PONTIOU
(PUCKETT).... BARRERA
.... -
(BEYER) ..... BARRERA ... -
(STANTON) .... ROTH -
(HAMMOND) ... SHERIDAN .. -
9.2.92
C..
fi
m
I
/�:�r:1 I I �' � V •
-77
Wi-MORMOMMA
M-
em
CA)
c7 C2-?
ty
•
9rj
� �! �uex.•
V
9/9/92 JOINT BOARD MEETING NOTES
#6 a - Report of the Joint Chairman
JC: This evening it is with deep regret and sorrow that I announce that
Jim McGuigan, husband of Pat McGuigan passed away on Thursday, the 3rd of
September. He was a long time Orange County Attorney. As a matter of fact, I
went to law school with Jim. We graduated together in 1972. It is with great
regret and a great loss to all of us and our condolences go out to Pat. It is
understandable that she is not with us this evening; I believe the funeral was
today.
I will move on to a presentation that I am pleased to make this evening. It is
to a person who has been with the Sanitation Districts for 25 years. It is with
pleasure this evening that I present to Gary Streed, who had started with the
Sanitation Districts as an Accountant in September 1967 and in August of 1981 he
was promoted to Accounting Supervisor. In September 1984 Gary was appointed
Chief Administrative Assistant to the General Manager. In October 1989 Gary was
appointed to his current position of Director of Finance. Gary is in charge of
all Accounting and Financial Activities, Purchasing and Warehousing and
Management Information Services. It is with a great deal of happiness that I am
going to present him with a pin, commemorating his 25 years of service. It is
like the ones that we all wear but it has a 25 year on the bottom. I must say it
shines much better than ours do.
GGS: Over the past 25 years I have learned one thing and that is not very much
gets done by just me. I would like to take this chance to thank my staff and
the other department heads and, especially the Directors and General Manager for
your support. I look forward to another 25 years.
JC: Upcoming Meetings - Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 are scheduled to
_ adjourn to next Wednesday evening, September 16th at 7:30 p.m. That is for the
purpose to consider their user fees for 1992-93. Please calendar that for next
Wednesday evening for 7:30 p.m.
The Executive Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, September 23rd at
5:30 p.m.
The Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee is scheduled to meet on Tuesday,
September 29th at 5:30 p.m.
#6(b) - Report of the General Manager
JWS: I have no special report this evening, Mr. Chairman. Staff will be
reporting on several agenda items later in the evening. I would like to ask
Mr. Streed to just brief you on the sale of our Series C Certificates of
Participation which took place early last week.
GGS: In your packet tonight, there is a pricing book that summarizes the events
leading up to and including the sale of the $98.5 million of certificates. The
sale was held last week and was very successful. All of the certificates were
sold by 8:00 in the morning. They were snapped up pretty fast. There was quite
a bit of activity in the market, including some issues of various
denominations. The initial interest rate was 2.7T, that is reset daily and
during the last week it hasn't exceeded 3.0% despite the large supply. We
continue to monitor that and we are very pleased with the results.
-1-
The certificates were rated AAA by both rating agencies because of the insurance
and provisions by The underlying ratings were AA and AA- just for the
Districts ourselves so very good ratings, very good price, very good results.
Out of $98.5 million, a little over $97.0 million was put in the bank, including
9.0% for reserves. That would conclude my report unless there are questions.
#9 - Consent Calendar
JC: We will move on to the Consent Calendar, Items No. 9 (a) - (j).
Director Roth: I would like the record to show that I abstain on Item No. 9(j).
Director Collins: I would like to pull Items 9(c)(d)(e)(f).
Director Stanton: I have asked the Clerk of the Board to report an abstention
on Item No. 9(j).
JC: Staff has requested that Item No. 9(g) be removed. The balance of the
items, we have a motion and a second. Is there any further discussion or
opposition? Seeing none, they will be deemed approved. Let us move to Item
Nos. 9(c)(d)(e)(f).
Director Collins: If you remember last month, there is an overall concern that
a Design Engineer can do some sloppy work and get away with it while the
Districts are paying increased costs due to the Engineer's ineffectiveness. Each
of the contracts we are going to discuss are over the original contract amounts.
Part of the reasons they are over is because the Design Engineer omitted items
from the contract drawings that I believe is due to negligence. Equipment,
parts and labor which almost always cost more when priced as "add-ons" and are
not included in the original contract bid.
By pulling these items and making the recommendations that I am going to make, I
hope to focus staff's attention and through them the Consulting Engineer's
awareness that this Board is going to be very critical of engineering design
errors and omissions.
Moving to Item No. 9(c), it sites design errors for IlUMS-1,`3.,.7-, 10, 11, 12,
�r This is the staff's report. It says that "cost recovery will be negotiated
with the consultant". This contract is 14.2% over original contract amount.
I would like to move acceptance of Item 9(c) with the following additions: I
WrV0ft�AM; J1�� 5r, 4, s b� .to i em5 , . ; &t9d regard ig :cos16
d very nego 'i tior�.S with Carrs;ulting >rng'indering flan. I would like a,repo
-t"w 'g,[IM to the Fiscal Policy Committee regarding the outcome of said
negotiations with consultant.
Director Stanton: I think the report should be available to all the Directors.
Director Collins: That's fine with me, Roger.
JC: The report can go to all Directors. (Deemed approved as amended.)
Director Collins: Item No. 9(d) - It sites Items 1 through 4 "would have been
included in original design if discovered or known". This contract is 3.3% over
the original contract amount.
-2-
I believe there was sufficient information at the time the that the Consulting
Engineers put together the design drawings and the items were omitted from the
contract documents because of "sloppy work".
I would like to move Item No. 9(d) with the following additions: Items 1-
through 4 be added to Item 5 regarding cost recovery negotiations with thef
Consulting Engineer, as well as a report be given to the Fiscal policy Committee
-.- regarding outcome of said negotiations with the Consultant.
JC: Can we assume that the report will be given to the Directors rather than
just the Fiscal Policy Committee?
Director Collins: That is fine with me.
JC: If that can be your motion. (Approved as amended)
Director Collins: Item No. 9(e) sites two items of additional work and states
they would have been included if discovered or known. This contract is 2.3%
over the original contract amount.
I believe the location of HVAC equipment and a parapet wall were significant
enough to be known at the time the Engineer did their drawings.
I would like to move Item 9(e) with the following additions: First, wftI-a;te!,�
cost recovery with Consulting Engineer for Items 1 and 2. Second, that a report
be given to the Board regarding the outcome of said negotiations with the
Consultant.
JC: (Deemed approved as amended)
Director Collins: Item No. 9(f) sites that we would look for "reimbursement"
fox items 2, 3 and 6-because Of "design errors". I believe Item 5 should be
added to this list. This contract is 1.2% over the original contract amount.
I would like to move Item 9(f) with the following additions: First, nerve
cast recovery for Items 2, 3, 5 and 6 from Design Engineer as well as do a?
.re:po'rt that will be given to the Board regarding the outcome of said
negotiations with the Consultant.
Director Laszlo: It says that this is a $9.4 million project and we are talking
about a $17,000 Change Order?
TMD: The whole project cost is $9.4 million net and this is a $17,000 Change
Order.
Director Laszlo: Because the Engineering Department left out this? Is that
what we're saying?
TMD: There were some errors and omissions in the plans which resulted in these
changes being added.
Director Laszlo: Isn't this standard?
TMD: Pretty standard, yes.
-3-
Director Laszlo: So what are we hassling about?
Director Collins: I'll address that. I disagree; I don't think think it is
pretty standard. Some of these items are just flat out errors by the engineer.
We hire an engineer to it for us and we take those drawings to a contractor and
he bids on them. If the engineer does not do a good job and the contractor has
to come back and charge us some add-ons later on, we, the District have to pay
for them. I find an exceptional high number of errors here by staff's own
commitments of this, of just being omitted. If we read between the lines, it's
gross negligence. This is one way of saving money.
TMD: When I said it is kind of standard on big jobs like this, it is a job
where we're retrofitting existing facilities. This particular one is working in
older facilities and replacing old engines with new motors and drives as a part
of our electrification requirements. There is always a number of these types of
errors that creep into the plans. I don't mean to minimize them but saying that
they are standard. They happen on every job and as Director Collins pointed
out, these four jobs all have some of the same types of errors. They were
omissions from the design plans and specifications and in that regard they are
standard. They were all omissions.
Director Sheridan: ---- contigency in the overall budget for these sorts of
things that there is an "X" number of percent that is excusable for-------
TMD: We have adequate budget but we don't plan for change orders. We know
there are going to be things by our history that will creep into plans and
specs. We don't plan that we are going to get "X" percent of errors. On our
jobs as Director Collins and I discussed, some of these jobs have 300 to 400
sheets of drawings on them. In some cases there just ---- between them. It's
something we work as hard as we can with our consultants and they try to improve
the quality control of the plans. There are always changes like this. Staff is
perfectly happy to make these reports to you and show you these things.
Director Sansone: I just wanted to support Director Collins. I personally
experienced this on the Bayside Drive project. The prime contractor got my ear
and pointed out that there were some inconsistencies in the specifications and
he said they should have never occurred. I know some things can slip but ------
I think that it is almost impossible for a consultant engineer to come up
without some changes and maybe we can alert these people that we are aware.
Director Main: I guess when it is an error of the consulting engineer or
whoever did the plans, that the staff does try to negotiate with them to get
some rebate.
TMD: We do and we get money back. We don't recover full cost; we try to
recover costs that we estimate is that extra incurred by the District. For
instance, if the change means that we built something and then we have to tear
something down because it was wrong (and that happens between mechanical sheets,
architectural sheets or the structural sheets or something doesn't get right) we
recover full for those types of errors. If it is an omission of something which
means it doesn't get replaced we try to estimate what the added cost to the
District is. That would be the cost that you don't do as well in the change
order as you would in the original bid. If you have ten light fixtures and nine
are included in the bid and you have to pay a change order for the tenth one,
the tenth one probably costs more than each of the other nine would. We try to
get that difference.
-4-
Director Stanton: I support Director Collins and commend him for his diligence
on this. I would certainly agree with him as for as the message that he is
sending. ------------- It shouldn't be standard and I think we should perk up
on these things.
JC: (Deemed approved as amended)
*�" #11 Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
JC: What we are going to be doing is starting the process for fee increases as
a result of the money "grab" by the State. This is the beginning of the process
in these particular Districts to increase user fees.
Director Roth: -----
JC: As I understand it, this evening is the first reading of the ordinances.
TLW: This is just the introduction of the ordinance and with the adjournment
of the meetings for the seven districts to next week. Consideration and the
hearing on the proposed ordinance will be held at that time.
Director Main: I would like to move that this be put on the agenda after we
have the meeting on the 16th so some of us Directors that haven't been here all
that many years find out what's going on. I think the fees are plenty as is and
I would like to find out more about it. This looks like an awful lot.
JC: We have a motion and a second. We now have a new motion and a second. Is
that correct?
We have a main motion; it's not a substitute motion. Therefore, we will take
the main motion unless we have a substitute motion.
Director Collins: Perhaps it would be beneficial if there was some discussion
from the Fiscal Policy Committee explaining why it is important on a timing
basis to have tonight setting the hearing and the 16th meeting and October 1st
meeting, and if we miss these dates, what are the ramifications?
JC: We can have a report from staff in regards to why the procedure has started
this evening as it is and the purpose for each of the hearings that are set out
in the material this evening.
TLW: Wayne wants to explain what has been developing with the Fiscal Policy
Committee and what the staff and my office has been working on. Procedurally,
the reasoning for setting it tonight was when the State legislature last week
enacted ---- 844 which was the tax shift proposal which is the compromise budget
program, it called the take away of 35% (to simplify this) from the special
districts Ad Valorem tax revenues. Part of that bill provided that the
districts that collect their taxes on the tax roll (as we do and historically
have done for many years) have until October 1st to get that data to the
Auditor. Previously, we had until August loth but obviously that date kept
slipping. They extended it to Auguste t (?). The Finance Department has to
prepare the computer tapes whic� es about a week and then get it to the
Auditor b October 1st. L
The scheduling was to have it introduced at this meeting, have it considered at a
hearing to either approve it or disapprove it on the merits next week on the
16th. If approved, the ordinance will be effective as of October 15th. That
the fees to commence October 15th but that will allow about 14 days for the
-5-
staff to get the contract to prepare the computer tapes and get them to the
Auditor and meet the October 1st deadline.
If we don't make that deadline, 1992-1993 fiscal year is history. We will not
be able to get the raises enacted and collect it on the tax roll. We do have
ordinances in effect. The existing ordinance was adopted in June and effective
July 1st with the rate that is presently in effect. The staff report notes the
incremental increase.
Director Stanton: Do we know whether it's going to be 35% or 40%?
JWS: No, we don't know and probably won't know for several months. What the
bill provides is that special districts will contribute or shift 35% of their
property tax revenues with a few exceptions that we will discuss however, if the
state-wide target of $375.0 million is not satisfied by that 35%, then the
County Auditors have the discretion to increase it up to another 5% for a total
of 40%, also subject to the 10% cap. We won't know until the County Auditor
calculates that. We've been told that that won't be until later in the fall,
once they have made the calculations for all the special districts that are
effected.
Again in summary, as Tom mentioned, the budget bill provides for the transfer of
between 35% to 40°%. Based upon the current year budget, 35% would be just under
$12.0 million for the seven districts affected. 40% tax loss would be $13.7
million. There is a provision in the budget that caps the amount that any
special district would lose at 10% of their ----- (tape ended).
----. We've been able to defeat that so far each time that that has come up so
there is a little good news in this state budget action.
As Tom mentioned, we collect our user fees on the tax bill because that is the
most cost effective way to do it. The reason that the proposal to introduce the
ordinance before you is summarized on page 5 of the committee's report which
sets forth the time table. Most of those dates Tom commented on. If it's the
Boards desire to adjust the user fees to make up for this loss of property tax
revenue, it could be done by the extended due date for filing that information
with the County Auditor of October 1st, in accordance with the schedule that is
before you on page 5 which provides for introduction of the ordinance and first
reading this evening.
The report also points out that the committee discussed the alternatives that
the Board has to address the loss of revenue from the property taxes. They
break down into four categories and there is more detailed staff reports in your
package. The committee's discussion is summarized in the green report.
One option is the issuance of short-term notes. Many of your agencies (on an
annual basis because of the cash -flow of the property taxes) have to borrow on
the short-term under what is commonly called the tax revenue anticipation notes
or TRAN to get them through that period. Many of you can arbitrage and actually
make money on that. You may recall the Boards discussed this several months ago
and because of our reserve position, bond counsel ruled that we could not do
short-term borrowing. Bond counsel has now ruled that because of the unique
situation caused by the State's action in confiscating our taxes, that the
Boards could in fact do short-term borrowing of taxable notes and in fact
arbitrage and come out with the net earnings. The committee discussed this at
great length and the consensus is that inasmuch as there is a very strong
likelihood that next year and the following years the State will be after what
they didn't get this year from special districts. In fact, there is a letter
from Senator Marian Bergeson in your package. We think, as you all know,
---- Senate local government committee that in essense says they will be back at
least for enterprise districts for the rest of our tax monies next year and
thereafter until they get it all. The committee was concerned that by
short-term borrowing we were just putting off the inevitable because next year
would be back with a similar situation and the fees would have to be raised by a
greater amount which would be that more difficult to explain.
Use of existing reserves is another option that the committee discussed. There
was concern about that because that would exacerbate our net revenue situation
because we would not only lose property taxes but lose the interest that we earn
on the reserves that we now have. Those, as you recall, are structured in
accordance with long-term financial strategy that the Board has adopted as a
result of our Master Plan.
Another issue there is, you've heard reports from staff and the Fiscal Policy
Committee over the last several months about the favorable reputation and rating
that we have in the bond market. Lastly in the type of business that we are in
we can have major emergencies occur at any time that are considerably expensive
to take corrective action on and of course the reserve position that the Boards
have takes that into consideration and that is why it's been established where
they are.
The committee also discussed for quite some time the potential of further future
budgetary cuts. I think it's fair to say and the committee members can correct
me if I'm wrong, but I believe the consensus of the committee is that they have
taken this into consideration early in the budget process because we already
knew there were state-wide proposals to raid our property taxes. We were also
very sensitive to the fact of the status of the economy is very poor. Taking
all those things into considertion you recall that the budget was in fact cut
$54.2 million for 1992-93 under what the 1991-92 budget was. In spite of our
costs continue to rise to comply with increasingly regulatory requirements.
There are some additional budgetary cuts that could be made. We discussed some
of those with the committee. We don't, as you know, in this business have alot
of discretionary expenditures. All of our money goes toward keeping the
treatment plants operating and meeting the standards imposed upon us. We could
cut back in such areas as research, regulatory and legislative monitoring and
activities and so forth. The committee discussed that at great lengths as well.
The committee decided given all of those considerations that the best
alternative was to adjust the user fees for this year to make up for that
property tax loss.
There are several pieces of information that we don't fully have yet that could
affect those fees. The fees that you have and are shown on the last page of the
Fiscal Policy Committee report would be those fees/adjustments that are required
to make up for the 35% tax loss based upon the 1992-93 budget that the Boards
adopted. There are several issues that we are obtaining clarification on
the State budget act and attempting to get the most current information from the
County on in terms of the tax base that will be used to calculate the tax shift,
how the 10% cap may apply and the other provision that we've discussed with you
in the past.
-7-
In fact the Board took an action several months ago is the provision in the
budget act that allows for exemption from property tax shift; those monies that
are dedicated to debt service. Staff and Counsel believe that we qualify under
that exemption and we are putting together our position on that to hopefully get
concurrence from the County Auditor.
All of those would have the effect of reducing the amount shown on the
committee's report that's required to make up for the tax loss. Preliminary
information that we have indicate that the tax cap will probably apply in all
districts but one. If, in fact we get a favdrable ruling on the exemption for
tax revenues dedicated to debt service that that would further reduce the fees.
The committee's recommendation is that you introduce the ordinance tonight to
adjust the fees for the reasons that they have enumerated in their report with
the understanding that once more definitive information is received, that the
Board will have the option at the second reading. That reading is tentatively
scheduled for a week from tonight to reduce those fees if the information
indicates that that could be done without jeopardizing the revenue status. Mr.
Chairman, I think that summarizes staff's understanding of the Fiscal Policy
Committee's recommendation.
Director Stanton: I understand what you're saying about the calendar but are
you saying this is an affirmative vote to increase (to vote for it) and not a
matter of introducing it as originally asked, it's a matter of voting in favor
of it?
JC: I think that the way it would work is it's the first reading. When the
second reading comes you could actually vote it down. This only starts the
process that is required so that we can go into the actual implementation of
this ordinance.
TLW: It's the first reading, it's scheduled for hearing, and a vote to adopt
if you continue this meeting to next Wednesday night. This is an analogous to
seconding for purposes of discussion. This is an introduction; it doesn't mean
that anyone that votes to introduce is bound to vote "yes" to adopt it.
Director Stanton: I understand that you can change your vote on the second time
but the fact is the first vote is an affirmative vote to raise the fees.
TLW: I guess literal interpretation of the words would be "yes" if you vote to
introduce it, you're voting "yes" for a document that increases the fees.
JC: Maybe a better way to say it is if you don't vote for it, you cannot
increase the fees. If you don't vote for this, you cannot increase the fees.
Director Stanton: I understand that and I respect that. I am in a state of
great uncertainty whether I want to support this.
Director Swan: With all due respect, Roger, I think that when the Fiscal Policy
Committee and Executive Committee reviewed the budget they spent alot of time on
it. One thing that was discussed here is that we hold the line on the budget
this year. One of the components in that budget was that we were going to get
the Central Generation on line and that was going to provide sort of a ---- for
revenue. Now, we're not going to get Central Gen on line so we're already
starting out a couple of million dollars behind on budget. We started off
M
holding the line; we're taking a considerable hit this year anyway and this is
an essential public service and it ought to be protected. Second of all, when
they come through and cut the next --- next year, which is probably true, the
shock going through to the people ....
Director Stanton: ----. You're arguing on the foundation that we make up that
revenue.
Director Swan: But even if you take 25% of it off, forego and don't do anything
this and then next year you try to go up 75% it will be double shock. ---------
I think that the feeling was that the people right now understand what the
legislature does. They passed a tax increase through us to them. I think that
if you pass it on through and explain it as to what you did and put into a
public relations campaign that is going to explain what is going on here,
they'll understand where the anger ought to be focused on. The principal thing
is that we spent alot of time on the budget and we already cut that back to hold
the line budget this year. Now you've done --- this year; we already know that
we're $2 million short. I think that it's quite important; it wasn't ----
decided by the Fiscal Policy Committee.
Director Sheridan: I guess I have to take issue with Supervisor Stanton. I
also want to compliment the scope of your report and also the work of the Fiscal
Policy Committee. We've been riding this horrible mess for almost three months
watching ------ I concur with the Fiscal Policy Committee and move the question
at this time.
JC: We need to take this District at a time so for right now...
Director Stanton: I'm not taking issue with the report. I think we have our
individual discretion as whether we vote for it or against it.
Director Griffin: I won't repeat what the General Manager and the other staff
commented on. I think that there are several other issues. Having sat on the
Fiscal Policy Committee, I appreciate the input both from staff and peers. The
issues prompted us to recommend to the Joint Boards that we cut the budget 10%
this year which was on the basis that we not raise our user fees. We did that
in good conscience to our constituents. Now we're faced with the other culprit,
the guys up north, and I think they need to take the heat if in fact that's
------ We're responsible to let the citizens know why this is happening. I
would ----- make the motion this evening and it didn't come easy for me to make
that motion but I think I reserve judgement on this as well. It needs to be
done tonight so that next week we can hear from the public and make a final
decision.
One other thing I think is particularly note -worthy is to what degree this Joint
Board is willing to meet its responsibility with regard to the health and safety
issues as well as the environmental issues that surround us. We're faced with
mandates from "big brother", from water quality to air quality, up and down the
ladder and who's paying the price. If someone doesn't stop it, we're going to
have to continue to these types of things. We're getting hit from all
directions. I think we owe it to our constituents to remember that if we don't
maintain the quality of effluent and discharge, then we could stand to lose alot
more money by going through full treatment at this plant. I think that is a
major gamble and I think it should be taken seriously.
S•12
Director Collins: Speaking politically, none of us elected officials want to
raise taxes. By the way, this is one of the finest reports given to us (about
ten pages). It has answered everyone of my questions and answered them before I
asked them, because some of my questions I had were in here, and I thought it
was an excellent job. It considered the bonds, the reserves, considered
reducing operational budgets. None of those to me, at this moment are what we
should be doing. Timing is a very important issue; not just the sequence of
events that takes us to October 1st but timing is important because we should
not lose the moment of who is to blame here. The blame is not here, it is up in
Sacramento. If we take ---- at a later date',' we will lose that moment and the
blame may rest here. If we take it on now and pass it on through fast and point
to Sacramento when we're asked what is going on, we're passing it through and
talk those people. We really have no choice in this matter. I am very
applauding to the report.
Director Main: Comments about Marian Bergeson's letter. Her letter tells me
that she doesn't know what she is talking about when it comes to funds due to
enterprise districts. I think we ought to put forth a real effort, all of us,
to write her, call her, inform her that that is not so. I don't know what
Districts did get extra money; I'd like to know, maybe we could go tap the same
source.
JC: I will only say in regards to that, that I know we have been communicating
quite diligently with all of our representatives in Orange County and she is
aware of the fact that this organization did not receive that in those funds.
We're just in the pot with everyone else and we're going to get hit like
everyone else. I don't think there was alot of concern.
Director Laszlo: I'm just trying to figure this out. First of all, we're
charging $60.00 a year. Next column says $17.50 and then there is a $57.04 and
then there is a $14.54 and then by 1992-93 there is $74.54. Is that correct?
JC: Yes, actually you're figures are going to come out. If you'll look at the
third column where it's $74.54, the way you would come up with that is take the
current 1992-93 user fee on the left, add the fourth column which is $14.54
which is the actual increase and you're going to be at a $74.54 for that
District. What we're talking about in the second and third columns is the
proration of the increase of the increase between July 1st through October 15th
and then from October 16th through June 30th next year. If you add the first
and the fourth and the second and the third, they both come out to $74.54. The
fourth column is really the one you want to look at. That's the increase per
District.
Director Stanton: I think what would make all of us more comfortable is if this
timing wasn't in place. I want to get a definitive answer from Mr. Woodruff
saying that there is no other way that this calendar will work in terms that
this first vote will not a public hearing. I would be alot more comfortable. I
was very moved by Mr. Collins argument more so than anyone else's. He got the
message across very very clearly. It still bothers me that we're not getting a
hearing now when we're taking the first -------- Is there anything else you
could do?
TLW: There may be a handful of days
get the computer tape prepared to the
the 16th and had the meeting and met
the following Wednesday, is the last
line of not making the deadline of a
we can play with in this month and still
County Auditor, etc. If you met again on
again on the 17th or 18th, maybe as late as
conceivably, that's approaching the risky
computer breaking down.
-10-
Director Stanton: I am trying to get an answer. Let's get real with the money
you're talking about. So as far as logistics are concerned, this is it?
TLW: Realistically, there may be two or three days that it could slide. You
would have to reconvene 17th, 18th and the 21st.
Director Stanton: I am very concerned about this. I reserve the right looking
at it only as an introduction of this; reserving the right to not going forward
JC: You have that right.
Director Sansone: The schedule is set to put in on the current tax bill. When
you get it on the current tax bill, they're going to take a look at last year's
tax bill and they're going to say Orange County Sanitation District has gone up
$75.00 or whatever. I wonder how much is it going to cost us to have a
supplemental bill? That's what's going to happen if we don't get it in on time.
They then would have to send out a supplemental bill and on that supplemental
bill, couldn't we then say on there "passed through State so and so" so the
public will know that it's not the Sanitation District but it's the whole state?
GGS: Last year that happened to one District in Irvine. The combination of
errors; the billing did not get put on the proper tax bill, not through the
fault of the agency. The County did send out a supplemental bill for that
particular area. They told me in no uncertain terms they would never do that
again. There is a considerable number of problems that occur when there are two
property tax bills for --- Nothing in the world is set up to expect more than
one property tax bill; title searches, real estate transactions, any number of
things follow it. The County said they would not under any circumstances.
JC: Roger, the only thing I can say in response to the shortness of the time is
I talked with Wayne and in consultation with General Counsel, the reason that we
reconvened the Fiscal Policy Committee last week was because, as you recall, we
were continuing Board meetings recognizing that the passage of the budget was
imminent. We wanted to act as soon as that budget was passed by convening the
Board and doing those things that were necessary to increase user fees if in
fact that's what we wanted to do. We have known since the last Board meeting
that this was going to happen and that we were going to convene. We didn't have
the particulars because at that time we didn't know how much of the money was
going to be taken from us. We now have the figures and we're now moving for
those Districts that wish to do so into a mode by review by the Fiscal Policy
Committee the recommendation of the best way to go is the user fee. John's
argument was very well made the night of the Fiscal Policy Committee meeting.
That is, that we're going to take the bullet eventually. I think as a District
we have been very responsible in trying to hold user fees to a minimum and meet
our commitments. I think this Board and previous Boards have made commitments
to the environment and to those people in Orange County that we will provide the
highest quality of service for the least amoDnt of cost. We do that and I think
the argument this evening is that it's time for us to begin to tell people who's
doing all this stuff to them. I'm going to tell you, I hope there is a way that
we can do that. We've talked about it and tried to strategize at the Fiscal
Policy Committee. How can we get the message out to the people. If we could do
that, we've won the battle. We have won the battle if we can convince the voter
that this all happened as a result of Sacramento and maybe the change in
Sacramento will stop this from happening next year. We don't know. We sit here
as a responsible agency. We do what we can and we knew this hit was coming.
Everyone of us knew we were going to get hit and we all waited until it
-11-
happened and now we're going to have to deal with it. We can deal with it by
using our reserves, we can do it through the sale of notes, we can put it off,
we can ignore it but sooner or later we're going to be in trouble and we're not
going to meet our commitments. This evening each District is going to be asked
by District. First off, I would like a motion to receive and file .... (Tape
Ended)
�-- I'm not going to even talk about it, John. It's gone. I've got to be certain
that that motion was from District 1. From now on, all these motions, seconds
and actions will be by District. The motion that was made was to move, if I'm
not mistaken, 11(a)(b)(c). There is no action on (b) and (c). Item #11 has
been moved and approved.
Now we will move to 11(c) and we are going to go district by district. The
first one will be District 1. I need a motion and a second. This is for the
first reading. Alright, we have a motion and a second. Is there any
discussion? Is there any opposition? Seeing none, it is deemed approved.
District 2, we have a motion and a second. Any discussion?
Director Main: This motion is to go ahead with the hearing? I oppose.
JC: You are in District 2. Now we have a motion and a second. Any more
discussion? I guess I'm assuming that these are for the three parts (a)(b)&(c),
the CEQA and the other matters, in these motions? Alright, we have in
District 2 a motion and a second. Any more discussion? Is there opposition?
Alright, one opposition. Alright it's approved.
TLW: If I could, on District 2 the second part of that motion is to waive the
reading of the ordinance in full and by title only. That must be passed by
unanimous vote. If not, we will have to read the ordinance in full.
Director Main: I'll go along with that.
JC: You're objecting to (a) and (c)? It will be deemed approved; (b) is
approved by unanimous consent, (a) and (c) are approved by majority. (Director
Main opposed (a) & (c).)
District 3, we have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Any opposition? To
what parts? We have a unanimous consent to item (b) and a majority to (a)
and (c). (Director Culver and Director Silva opposed (a) & (c).)
District 5, we have a motion and a second. Is there any discussion? Is there
any opposition? Alright, (b) is approved by unanimous consent, (a) and (c) by
majority. (Director Roth opposed (a) & (c).)
District 6, we had a motion and a second. Any discussion? Is there opposition?
Alright, we have then unanimous on (b) and majority on (a) and (c).
(Director Roth opposed (a) & (c).)
District 7, we have a motion and a second. Discussion? opposition? Again, an
unanimous on (b) and majority on (a) and (c). (Director Roth opposed (a)
& (c).)
District 11, we have a motion and a second. Is there any discussion? Is there
any opposition? Those all three will be deemed approved by unanimous consent.
-12-
#11(d) - Develop and implement a public information program
JC: This for the purposes of telling the people who is responsible for this.
VJC: Before we finalize the PR campaign, Mr. Sansone ask a question. What
would it cost to separate the tax bill. I wonder if we have the cost figures on
what it would cost to notify everyone by mail that gets a tax bill?
JWS: Just for postage.
Director Swan:-------
JC: I think that really putting together the information program will take into
consideration all of these things in trying to evaluate which is the best way to
get to the public and try to tell them and certainly those factors would be
included. What we will probably do is have staff put together some proposals
and give it to the Fiscal Policy Committee to review and make recommendation on
and bring it back to the Board.
Director Kelly: The opportunity for developing a public information program
might allow us to consider a televising of the open meeting on the 16th. We do
have access channels which would be of value to us. I am certain that
testimonies such as Director Collins and Supervisor Stanton and all sides will
be represented on and should maybe considered by this panel.
Director Laszlo: I was just going to ask if you have a contingency plan for the
parking lot?
Director Richardson: There needs to be some thorough thinking as to what is
communicated to the public. --------.
JC: The thought is that basically the increase is not actually going to be seen
by the public for some time so we do have some time to begin educating the
public of why this is coming. Again how we do that is the consideration here.
Is it a mailer, is it something we can put in the tax bill or what is it going
to be. Is going to be in the newspaper, will it be television, will it be a
combination of all these things. I think that anyone of the mediums you use,
you're limited in the coverage that you get. It isn't that if we pass this, the
intent is not to try to have the people unless Director Kelly brought up, be
able to see the actual action if you sit here and debate this. It's basically
if in fact it's approved, having some methodology that can go to the public and
tell them why it is coming. It certainly isn't with our blessing that it is
happening. That is really what we are doing here and when we talked about
30 days it was if we have a recommendations made to the Fiscal Policy Committee,
they can review it and refer back to us.
Director Richardson: I would like to register a real strong concern that the
contingency plan to the campaign will be ready to go next week because I can
guarantee that once word starts to filter out regardless as to who is forcing us
to take whatever action, the people are going to want to know so all the
Directors need to have some information to be able to respond to that
immediately. I think that needs to happen alot sooner than 30 days from now.
-13-
JC: We will be armed with information as to why this is going on so if people
come to us, we will have this information. I'm not concerned about a
constituent coming to me and me being able to justify why it happened. It's the
people that don't come to us, read the bill and get ticked off at the Sanitation
Districts because we're jabbing them.
Director Griset: This proposal I presume is that the program will be
implemented?
JC: Yes
Director Swan: I just wanted to point out that most of the Districts, we're
talking it's about $12 - $13 a year difference on the tax bill. We're not
talking about hundreds of dollars.
Director Richardson: Peer, it doesn't matter. It's big money to senior
citizens; that argument is not going to wash.
Director Main: Do I understand that this is just on the single family
residences?
JC: On the very last page in the supporting documents is a break-out of the
single, multiple and commercial.
Director Stanton: With regards to the words being used, PR I don't think is
appropriate. Information is information. Educate the public is something I
take offense to. I disassociate myself for using those words. We're assuming
that it is going to pass and that is exactly why I am against the vote tonight
because I don't think we ought to assume. I want to hear what is going to be
said at that hearing. It doesn't matter if it is U or $2 or $20, it just
doesn't matter.
JC: I understand, Roger. Thank you for your correction of our terminology. An
educator can always help us in regards as to how we should be saying things. I
must say "thank you" for the indulgence in this; it isn't an easy matter for any
of us and none of us like to go to our people and tell them that they are going
to have to pay more money but we have at least started the process. We will
meet next week and either continue it or kill it, whichever way it may go but I
think the discussion has been very healthy and helpful and hopefully next week
we'll be able to do those things that are in the best interest of our people.
CLOSED SESSION
-14-
COUNTY SANITATION
Q
DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14
�1
OF
a
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
SEPTEMBER 9, 1992
�tt1TATIp�,
�/ 5 tapplitatt
p Sfoce 195A
NNGE Cps/
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
� 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
u
ROLL CALL
�f
\,U011
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on September 9, 1992, at
7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance
and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS
ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: x
Dan Griset, Chairman
Robert Richardson
x
Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tem
Gene Beyer
x
Thomas R. Saltarelli
Leslie A. Pontious
_L
_Roger Stanton
Don R. Roth
x
James A. Wahner
James Ferryman
DISTRICT NO. 2: x
Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman
John M. Gullixson
x
John Collins, Chairman pro tem
George Scott
x
Fred Barrera
Gene Beyer
a
Buck Catlin
Chris Norby
x
Barry Denes
Bob Bell
x
William D. Mahoney
James H. Flora
x
Robert H. Main
Norman Culver
x
Carrey J. Nelson
Glenn Parker
a
Arthur G. Newton
John 0. Tynes
x
Iry Pickler
Fred Hunter
x
Miguel Pulido
Dan Griset
x
Roger Stanton
Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 3:
DISTRICT NO. 5:
DISTRICT NO. 6:
x Sal A. Sapien,
x Burnie Dunlap,
a Buck Catlin
x John Collins
x Norman Culver
a James V. Evans
x James H. Flora
x Don R. Griffin
x Frank Laszlo
Pat McGuigan
x Eva G. Miner
x Richard Partin
x Iry Pickler
x Jim Silva
x Roger Stanton
x Charles Sylvia
Chairman
Chairman pro tem
x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman
x Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tem
x Don R. Roth
x James A. Wahner, Chairman
-7—Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tern
x Don R. Roth
Harry M. Dotson
Carrey J. Nelson
Chris Norby
George Scott
Robert H. Main
Margie L. Rice
William D. Mahoney
Rhonda J. McCune
Gwen A. Forsythe
x Robert Richardson
Larry Herman
Cecilia L. Age
Fred Hunter
Earle Robitaille
Don R. Roth
Ronald Bates
Evelyn Hart
John C. Cox, Jr.
Roger Stanton
Dick Sherrick
Ruthelyn Plummer
Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: x Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Thomas R. Saltarelli
x James A. Wahner, Chairman pro tem Nate Reade
x Fred Barrera Gene Beyer
x John C. Cox, Jr. Ruthelyn Plummer
x Robert Richardson Miguel Pulido
x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton
x Sally Anne Sheridan Barry Hammond
DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman Linda Moulton -Patterson
x Jack Kelly, Chairman pro tem Don MacAllister
x Roger Stanton Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 13: x John M. Gullixson, Chairman Henry W. Wedaa
-x-Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tem Gene Beyer
Glenn Parker x Burnie Dunlap
x Iry Pickler Fred Hunter
x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller
x Leslie A. Pontious, Chairman pro tern Charles E. Puckett
x Fred Barrera Gene Beyer
x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton
x Sally Anne Sheridan Barry Hammond
-2-
09/09/92
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes,
Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant
Board Secretary, Corrine Clawson,
Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges,
John Linder, Margie Nellor, Bob Ooten,
Mary Simpson, Chuck Winsor
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel,
Mary Lee, Rayeke Mazarei, Dick
Sherrick, Phil Stone, Richard
von Langen
*************
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file minute excerpt
re Board Appointments That the minute excerpt from the City
of Anaheim re appointment of alternate
Director, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows:
(*Mayor)
Active Director Alternate Director
Iry Pickler Fred Hunter*
ALL DISTRICTS Chairman Mahoney recognized Gary G.
Presentation of service pin to Streed, Director of Finance,,for
District employee Gary G. Streed 25 years of outstanding service to the
Districts. Gary heads up the
Districts' Finance Department and is responsible for all accounting and
financial activities, as well as the Purchasing and Warehouse Division and
the Management Information Services Division.
He then presented Mr. Streed with a 25-year service pin.
ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Mahoney regretfully
Report of the Joint Chairman announced that Jim McGuigan, husband
of Director Pat McGuigan and
long-time Orange County attorney, had passed away. Chairman Mahoney then
extended the Directors' and staff's condolences to Director McGuigan.
Chairman Mahoney then announced that Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 would
be adjourning to Wednesday, September 16, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. to consider
possible action to adjust Districts sewer service user fees for 1992-93 in
response to the State's confiscation of Districts' property taxes.
He also reported that the Executive Committee was scheduled to meet on
Wednesday, September 23rd, at 5:30 p.m.
He further stated that the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee was
scheduled to meet on Tuesday, September 29th, at 5:30 p.m.
-3-
it
09/09/92
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager requested that a
Report of the General Manager brief status report be given to the
Directors by the Director of Finance
�r...� regarding the sale of the Series C Certificates of Participation (COP) which
recently took place.
Mr. Streed referred the Directors to a booklet included in their meeting
folders that evening which summarized the sale of the Series C $98.5 million
variable rate COPs. He reported the market was active the day of the sale
with all COPs sold by 8:00 a-.m. The initial interest rate was 2.7%, which
is reset daily. Despite the large supply of bonds on the market, the
interest rate had not exceeded 3.0% and staff was continuing to monitor the
rates.
M
H
h
He further reported that the COPs were rated AAA and Aaa by the rating
agencies because of the insurance provisions.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held August 12, 1992,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 2
Approval of Minutes
the Chairman ordered that said minutes
There being no corrections or
amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held August 12, 1992,
be deemed approved, as mailed.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 3
Approval of Minutes
the Chairman ordered that said minutes
There being no corrections or
amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held August 12, 1992,
be deemed approved, as mailed.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 5
Approval of Minutes
the Chairman ordered that said minutes
DISTRICT 6
Approval of Minutes
the Chairman ordered that said minutes
DISTRICT 7
Approval of Minutes
the Chairman ordered that said minutes
There being no corrections or
amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held August 12, 1992,
be deemed approved, as mailed.
There being no corrections or
amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held August 12, 1992,
be deemed approved, as mailed.
There being no corrections or
amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held August 12, 1992,
be deemed approved, as mailed.
-4-
09/09/92
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held August 12, 1992,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held August 12, 1992,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held August 12, 1992,
the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint
and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual
District claims set forth on pages
"A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized
below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts
so indicated.
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund
Joint Working Capital Fund
Self -Funded Insurance Funds
DISTRICT NO. 1
DISTRICT NO. 2
DISTRICT NO. 3
DISTRICT NO. 5
DISTRICT NO. 6
DISTRICT NO. 7
DISTRICT NO. 11
DISTRICT NO. 13
DISTRICT NO. 14
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT
8/12/92
- $1,003,566.85
- 2,815,662.45
- 145,981.49
-0-
- 595.00
- 15,165.99
- 24,773.87
- 15,583.92
-0-
- 1,885,011.37
6,691.01
-0-
6,952.04
203.65
3,813.12
- 170.39
5, 24,171.15
-5-
8/26/92
$ 826,685.01
2,679,507.83
157,907.44
101,023.30
46,763.65
178,105.11
27,888.33
165,259.88
26.69
14,984.20
677.18
-0-
430,455.85
3,838.74
-0-
5,430.74
4,638,553.95
P-s
.
PP
09/09/92
ALL DISTRICTS
Awarding Microcomputer Hardware,
,*.,.,,Software and Associated
Peripherals, Specification
No. E-219, to Golden Star
Technology, Inc.
u
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the bid tabulation and
recommendation re award of purchase
order contract for Microcomputer
Hardware, Software and Associated
Peripherals, Specification No. E-219,
be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded
to Golden Star Technology, Inc. for it systems, for a total amount not to
exceed $55,853.00 plus sales tax.
ALL DISTRICTS
Authorizing staff to issue purchase
order to Beckman Instruments, Inc.
for Purchase of One Tabletop Optima
TL Ultracentrifuge (Specification
No. E-220
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby,
authorized to issue a purchase order
to Beckman Instruments, Inc. in
the amount of $42,966.00 plus sales
tax, for Purchase of One Tabletop
Optima TL Ultracentrifuge (Specification No. E-220).
ALL DISTRICTS Director John Collins expressed
Actions re Change Orders for concern over the amount of and reasons
Job Nos. J-17; J-1 -1; P1-34-3, for various items included on change
P1-35-2 and J-21; and P2-42-1 orders on Job Nos. J-17; J-19-1;
P1-34-3, P1-35-2 and J-21; and
P2-42-1. He stated the Districts' cost for items added on are almost always
higher than if included in the original bid amount.
His intention, he concluded, was to focus staff's and consulting design
engineers' attention and awareness that the Directors would be very critical
of engineering design errors and omissions. A general discussion of the
nature of change orders pertaining to large construction projects took place
and the following actions were taken:
Approving Change Order No. 12 to Director Collins requested that
the plans and specifications for Item Nos. 5, 6, 8 and 9 be
Job No. J-17 included with the other cost
recovery Item Nos. 1, 3, 7, 10,
11, 12 and 13 for negotiation with the consultant with a follow-up
report to the Directors on the outcome of said negotiations.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 12 to the plans and specifications for Central
Laboratory, Job No. J-17, authorizing an addition of $58,714.00 to the
contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for 15 items of additional
work, and granting a time extension of 72 calendar days for completion
of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
M
09/09/92
Approving Change Order No. 13 to
the plans and specifications for
Job No. J-19-1
design consultant with a follow-up
outcome of said negotations.
Director Collins requested that
Item Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 be
included with Item No. 5 for cost
recovery negotiations with the
report to the Directors on the
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order -No. 13 to the plans and specifications for Central
Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an
addition of $46,279.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for five
items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
Approving Change Order No. 13 to Director Collins requested that
the plans and specifications for Item Nos. 1 and 2 of Change Order
Job Nos. P1-34-3, P1-35-2 and J-21 No. 13 be negotiated for cost
recovery with the design
consultant, with a follow-up report to the Directors on the outcome
of said negotiations.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 13 to the plans and specifications for
Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare
Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21, authorizing an addition of
$15,957.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn
Constructors, Inc., for two items of additional work, be, and is
hereby, approved.
Approving Change Order No. 5 to the Director Collins requested that
plans and specifications for negotiations for Item No. 5 be
Job No. P2-42-1 included with the other Items
Nos. 2, 3 and 6 for cost recovery
from the design engineer, with a follow-up report to the Directors on
the outcome of said negotiations.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for
Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-42-1, authorizing an addition of $17,689.00 to the contract with
Ziebarth & Alper and C. S. Alper Construction Co., Inc., for six items
of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
-7-
09/09/92
ALL DISTRICTS
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement
That the Boards of Directors hereby
\r.,.,/with Boyle Engineering Corporation
adopt Resolution No. 92-127,
For preparation of Wastewater
approving Addendum No. 1 to the
Quality, Diversion and Treatment
Professional Services Agreement with
Study
Boyle Engineering Corporation for
preparation of Wastewater Quality,
Diversion and Treatment Study,
providing for a reallocation of the costs
among categories within said agreement,
with no change in the maximum
authorized compensation of $88,055.00.
Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part
of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve written
report of the Fiscal Policy
That the written report of the Fiscal
Committee
Policy Committee's meeting held on
received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11
Actions re proposed ordinances
amending ordinances increasing
sanitary sewer service charges to
replace Districts' property taxes
confiscated by the State
Verbal report of staff and
General Counsel
September 2, 1992, be, and is hereby,
The General Counsel reported that,
pursuant to the recommendations
of the Fiscal Policy and
Executive Committees the proposed ordinances to increase the Districts'
1992-93 sanitary sewer service charges to make up for Districts'
property taxes confiscated by the State were being introduced for the
first reading tonight. The Districts would then adjourn to Wednesday,
September 16, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. to hold the second reading, a public
hearing and then consider the ordinances for adoption. If adopted, the
effective date would be October 16, 1992, 30 days following adoption.
In response to Directors' questions regarding the scheduling for
consideration of sewer service fee adjustment ordinances, Mr. Woodruff
explained that the introduction of the ordinances at this meeting was
needed because of certain provisions in the recently approved State
budget. The budget includes a tax shift that generally calls for
taking between 35% and 40%, not to exceed 10% of total revenue, from
special districts' ad valorem tax revenue. Part of that bill provided
that those special districts, such as the Sanitation Districts, that
collect their annual sewer service fees on the tax roll have until
October 1, 1992 to submit the necessary data to the Auditor's office
for inclusion on the 1992-93 tax bill. If this deadline is not met,
then the fees could not be adjusted and collected for the Districts for
the 1992-93 fiscal year. Currently the Districts do have ordinances in
effect to collect the old sewer service fees but the proposed increases
are reflected in the new ordinances. Thus, the ordinance introduction
and hearing must be completed essentially in accordance with the
recommended schedule in order to meet the October 1st deadline.
1.2
09/09/92
In response to Directors' questions, the General Manager stated that
the final impact of the State's budget is still unknown, and probably
will not be known for several months because of certain provisions in
the State's budget bill. He explained that the bill provides that 35%
of special districts property tax revenues not to exceed 10% of their
total revenue, will initially be shifted. However, if the state-wide
target of $375.0 million is not satisfied by that 35% transfer, then
the County Auditors have the discretion to increase the transfer up to
another 5%, for a total of 40%, but still subject to a 10% cap. Thus,
the final amount won't be known until the County Auditor calculates it.
They have advised this will be done later in the fall once calculations
have been made for all the special districts that are affected
state-wide.
Mr. Sylvester reiterated that the Districts collect user fees on the
tax bill as the most cost effective way to do it. Thus, i.n order to
meet the extended time limit of October 1, 1992 to supply data tapes to
the County Auditor's office for the 1992-93 property tax roll, the
increased fee consideration must follow the aforementioned time
schedule included in the report of the Fiscal Policy and Executive
Committees.
He also pointed out that the Fiscal Policy Committee discussed at
considerable length alternatives to address the loss of revenue from
the property tax confiscation. One option was the issuance of
short-term notes. Many member agencies, on an annual basis, because of
the cash -flow of property tax receipts, have to borrow for the%
short-term using what is commonly called tax revenue anticipation notes
(TRANs) to get through the so-called dry period. Often net arbitrage
earnings result. Several months ago the Districts discussed this
alternative. However, because of our reserves position, our bond
counsel ruled that the Districts could not do such short-term
borrowing. Bond counsel has now ruled, however, that it is possible
for the Districts to do short short-term borrowing using taxable notes
because of the unique situation caused by the State's action in
confiscating our taxes and, 'in fact, it is projected that we could also
arbitrage and come out with net earnings. The Fiscal Policy Committee
discussed this at great length and the consensus was that there is a
very strong likelihood that next year and in the following years, the
State will be after what remaining property taxes they didn't get this
year from special districts. Mr. Sylvester also referred to a letter
from Senator Marian Bergeson, Chair of the Senate Local Government
Committee, that was included in the Directors' agenda packages. Her
letter basically says that the State will be back, at least to the
enterprise districts, for the rest of their tax monies next year, and
each year thereafter until the State gets it all. Thus, the Fiscal
Policy Committee was concerned that short-term borrowing would only be
putting off the inevitable of increasing service fees by an even
greater amount and it would be more difficult to explain.
-9-
09/09/92
Another option discussed was the use of existing reserves. There was
concern that this would exacerbate the Districts' net revenue situation
��..� because we would not only lose the property taxes confiscated by the
State, but also lose the interest being earned on the reserves.
Further, the current reserve structure is in accordance with the long
term financial strategy that the Board has adopted as part of the
Districts 30-year wastewater management plan. Another related issue
concerns the possible negative impact that reducing reserves might have
on the Districts' favorable reputation and rating in the bond market.
Also of great concern is that in the wastewater business, major
emergencies can occur at any time that are expensive to take corrective
action on and the reserve levels established by the Boards take that
into consideration.
The Committee discussed at great length the matter of further budgetary
cuts. It was pointed out that in putting together the 1992-93-budgets,
the Committee recognized the current state of the economy and therefore
sharpened the budget pencil and cut it by $54.2 million under the
1991-92 budget. This was accomplished in spite of the fact that
Districts' costs of operation continue to rise because of the added
costs of complying with regulatory requirements, both air quality and
water quality, and costs associated with increasing sewerage flows
resulting from ongoing development and population increases. Part of
the costs associated with these two are, of course, the expenses
necessary for operating and maintaining the approximately $100 million
in new facilities that are placed into service each year. The impacts
of inflation also affect our costs. It was noted that due to the
probable delay in starting up central generation we anticipate running
over the budget because we will not realize the full electrical cost
savings anticipated with an earlier start-up.
It was also noted that there are few discretionary expenditures in
operating wastewater treatment facilities. Although some further
operating budget cuts could be made, any meaningful reductions would
impair our operating and maintenance capabilities for processing
230 million -gallons -per -day, and thus jeopardize our ability to keep
the collection, treatment and disposal facilities in a state of repair
that enables us to continuously comply with regulatory requirements and
protect public health, the marine environment and the.beaches.
Research and development is an example of what might be considered
discretionary,.and there are some others. But, it was observed,
Districts' research and development is directed towards the goals of
finding better and more efficient ways of doing things, and assuring
that the public's health and the environment are being adequately
protected. The same can be said of such activities as our involvement
in legislative and regulatory affairs which is intended to bring some
rationality to laws and regulations that will, in the long run, save
millions of dollars.
09/09/92
It was therefore the consensus of the Committee that the staff and the
Boards of Directors had already acted in an earnest and responsible -
manner by cutting $54.2 million from the 1992-93 budget and holding
1992-93 fees at the same level as 1991-92; and that further 1992-93
budget cuts would jeopardize the integrity and quality of the
Districts' wastewater management program and the Boards' level of
service commitment to the citizens, communities and the coastal cities
for the protection of public health and the environment. The Committee
was also concerned that further cutbacks would jeopardize the
Districts' 301(h) Waiver NPDES Permit which saves the citizens of
Orange County $50 million a year. However, the members also agreed
that the Fiscal Policy Committee and staff should continue to work
together to consider potential future opportunities for budgetary
savings and operational economies.
For these reasons, it was also the consensus of the Committee that the
action of the Governor and State Legislature in confiscating up to
$13.7 million (40%) of the Districts annual property tax, and the
likelihood that the State will eventually take 100% or ($34.2 million)
of the Districts' annual property taxes, the Directors have no viable
alternative but to raise user fees.
Mr. Sylvester also reported that there was information not available at
this time that could affect the projected user fees. The Districts are
attempting to get the most current information from the County in terms
of the tax base that will be used to calculate the tax shift and how
the 10% cap may apply. He also reminded the Directors of an action
they took several months ago and the provision in the budget act that
allows exemption from any property tax shift, for those tax monies that
are dedicated to debt service. Staff and Counsel believe the Districts
may qualify under that exemption and are putting together our position
on that to hopefully get concurrence from the County Auditor.
Preliminary information also indicates that the 10% revenue cap will
probably apply in some Districts. All of these would have the affect
of reducing the estimated amount of property taxes shown in the
Committee reports as being confiscated.
He then summarized the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation to
introduce the ordinances this evening to adjust user fees with the
understanding that once more definitive information is received, the
Boards will have the option to adopt or reject the ordinances at the
second reading. The second reading is scheduled for September 16,
1992.
The Boards then entered into a lengthy discussion of the State's budget
action and the proposed increase of sewer service fees for 1992-93 to
make up for the loss of up to $13.7 million in Districts' local
property taxes being seized by the State to help balance California's
budget. During the discussion several Directors reiterated the
deliberations and conclusions of the Fiscal Policy Committee and spoke
in favor of the Committee's recommendation to increase in Districts
sewer service fees to replace the property taxes shifted to the State
by the Governor and Legislature. The point was made that there are
options as reported by the Fiscal Policy Committee, but that they were
short term, not in the best interests of the Districts or their
-11-
09/09/92
constituents, and that under any alternative sewer service charges
would ultimately have to be raised to avoid jeopardizing the Districts'
fiscal and operational integrity. It was also pointed out that
increasing the fees now would be better understood by the public
because of their current awareness that it was precipitated by the
actions of the State Legislature and Governor. It was further pointed
out that the proposed fee adjustments were based on the best
information currently available and that if clarifying information
pertaining to certain provisions of the tax shift was forthcoming from
the State or County prior to adoption of any new fees, the fees could
be adjusted accordingly.
Other Directors expressed concern and discomfort over the proposed
sewer service fee increases and particularly the short time frame that
the Boards were faced with in considering and acting on the
alternatives; i.e., the need to introduce ordinances, hold first and
second readings, conduct a public hearing and consider adoption, all in
order to enable computerized fee data to be submitted to the County
Auditor by the October 1st deadline established as part of the State's
budget action. In response to a question regarding the possibility of
delaying consideration and issuing a supplemental bill in.the event
fees for 1992-93 were ultimately increased, Directors were advised that
the County Auditor would not allow such a procedure. In response to
questions concerning whether a vote in favor of introducing the
proposed ordinances was considered a vote in favor of increasing the
sewer service charges, it was clarified that an affirmative vote for
the agenda item was only a vote to introduce the ordinance and pass to
second reading and hearing on September 16th, and not necessarily a
vote in favor of a fee increase. It was further clarified that the
Directors reserved the right not to go forward with the proposed fee
increase after second reading and the public hearing.
Following further discussion and clarification of procedures to be
followed in considering and voting on the agenda items pertaining to
the proposed ordinances to increase 1992-93 sewer service charges, the
following actions were taken by the respective Boards:
DISTRICT 1
Actions re introduction of proposed
Ordinance No. 121
Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly
rdinance No. 121 is statutorily carried:
exempt per CEQA Guidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 121, An Ordinance of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing
Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 118,
is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that
the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to
assure the protection of the environment; and the increased
revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will
be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and
meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are
necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing
defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the
comprehensive Master Plan.
-12-
09/09/92
First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 121 carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 121, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 118, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 121 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 121, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 109 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 118, be introduced and passed
to second reading and public hearing on September 16, 1992, at
7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office.
DISTRICT 2
Actions re introduction of proposed
Ordinance No. 216
Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 216 is statutorily carried:
exempt per CEQA Guidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 216, An Ordinance of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 210 Establishing
Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 213,
is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that
the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to
assure the protection of the environment; and the increased
revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will
be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and
meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are
necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing
defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the
comprehensive Master Plan.
Director Main requested that his vote in opposition to the motion
be made a matter of record.
First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 216 carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 216, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 210 Establishing Sanitary Sewer -
Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 213, be read by title
only; and,
-13-
09/09/92
\,,a"
\-awrf
im
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 216 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 216, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 210 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 213, be introduced and passed
to second reading and public hearing on September 16, 1992, at
7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office.
Director Main requested that his vote in opposition to the motion
be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 3
Actions re introduction of proposed
Ordinance No. 319
Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 319 is statutorily carried:
exempt per CEQA Guidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 319, An Ordinance of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing
Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 316,
is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that
the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to
assure the protection of the environment; and the increased
revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will
be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and
meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are
necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing
defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the
comprehensive Master Plan.
Directors Culver and Silva requested that their votes in
opposition to the motion be made a matter of record.
First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 319 carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 319, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 316, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 319 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
-14-
09/09/92
That Ordinance No. 319, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 309 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 316, be introduced and passed 1
to second reading and public hearing on September 16, 1992, ata.r�
7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office.
Directors Culver and Silva requested that their votes in
opposition to the motion be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 5
Actions re introduction of proposed
Ordinance No. 528
Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 528 is statutorily carried:
exempt per CEQA Guidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 528, An Ordinance of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing
Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 525,
is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that
the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to
assure the protection of the environment; and the increased
revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service charges will
be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and
meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are
necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing
defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the
comprehensive Master Plan.
Director Roth requested that his vote in opposition to the motion
be made a matter of record.
First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 528 carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 528, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 525, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 528 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 528, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 516 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 525, be introduced and passed
to second reading and public hearing on September 16, 1992, at
7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office.
-15-
09/09/92
Director Roth requested that his vote in opposition to the motion
be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 6
Actions re introduction of proposed
Ordinance No. 622
Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 622 is statutorily carried:
exempt per CEQA Guidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 622, An Ordinance of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing
Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 619,
is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that
the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to
assure the protection of the environment; and the increased
revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service.charges will
be used for meeting operational and maintenance expenses and
meeting financial reserves and capital requirements which are
necessary for the continued maintenance of service within existing
defined service areas of the Districts as set forth in the
comprehensive Master Plan.
Director Roth requested that his vote in opposition to the motion
be made a matter of record.,
First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 622 carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 622, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 619, be read by title
only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 622 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 622, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 609 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 619, be introduced and passed
to second reading and public hearing on September 16, 1992, at
7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office.
Director Roth requested that his vote in opposition to the motion
be made a matter of record.
III.W, -16-
09/09/92
DISTRICT 7
Actions re introduction of proposed
Ordinance No. 729
Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 729 is statutorily carried:
exempt per CEQA Guidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 729, An Ordinance of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 725 Establishing
Sanitary Sewer Service Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
Sections 15273(a) and 21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a
regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection
of the environment; and the increased revenues to be received by
the sanitary sewer service charges will be used for meeting
operational and maintenance expenses and meeting financial
reserves and capital requirements which are necessary for the
continued maintenance of service within existing defined service
areas of the Districts as set forth in the comprehensive Master
Plan.
Director Roth requested that his vote in opposition to the motion
be made a matter of record.
First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 729 carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 729, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 725 Establishing Sanitary Sewer
Service Charges, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading -of Ordinance No. 729 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 729, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 725 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and public
hearing on September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's
Administrative Office.
Director Roth requested that his vote in opposition to the motion
be made a matter of record.
-17-
MI
09/09/92
DISTRICT 11
Actions re introduction of proposed
Ordinance No. 1118
Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 1118 is statutorily carried:
exempt per CEQA Guidelines
That the Board of Directors
hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1118, An Ordinance of
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of
Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108
Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing
Ordinance No. 1115, is statutorily exempt pursuant to California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15273(a) and
21080(b)(8) in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by
the District to assure the protection of the environment; and the
increased revenues to be received by the sanitary sewer service
charges will be used for meeting operational and maintenance
expenses and meeting financial reserves and capital requirements
which are necessary for the continued maintenance of service
within existing defined service areas of the Districts as set
forth in the comprehensive Master Plan.
First reading of proposed Moved, seconded and duly
Ordinance No. 1118 carried:
That proposed Ordinance No. 1118, An Ordinance of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County,
California, Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary
\-O.Or, Sewer Service Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1115, be read
by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be,
and is hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1118 by title only, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 1118, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 1108 Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service
Charges, and Repealing Ordinance No. 1115, be introduced and
passed to second reading and public hearing on September 16, 1992,
at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 11
Authorizing staff to develop and
implement a public information
program re need to raise sewer
service charges to recover property
taxes confiscated by the State
The Directors entered into a
discussion of the Fiscal Policy
Committee's recommendation to develop
a public information program
explaining the need to raise
Districts' sanitary sewer charges to
recover property taxes confiscated by
the State as a result of the actions of the Governor and State Legislature.
The pros and cons and content of such a program and some alternative means
of communicating with the public were also discussed. It was the concern of
the Directors that development of a program should proceed and be submitted
for review and further direction before implementation.
-18-
09/09/92
After further comments and discussion by Directors, it was moved, seconded
and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to develop and i
implement a public information program explaining the need to raise
Districts' sanitary sewer service charges to recover property taxes
confiscated by the State as a result of the action of the Governor and State
Legislature that will initially take up to 40% of the Districts' annual
property taxes.
ALL DISTRICTS
General Counsel's Comments Prior to
Closed Session
General Counsel reported to the
Directors of the need for a closed
session as authorized by Government
Code Section 54956.9 to review:
1) A proposed settlement of litigation entitled, United States Government
vs. Montrose Chemical Company, County Sanitation Districts.
2) Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the
manufacturer and general contractor on Districts' two jobs relating to
the co -generation combustion engines.
ALL DISTRICTS
Convene in closed session pursuant
to Government Code Section
54956.9
Minutes of the Closed Session held by
prepared in accordance with California
are maintained by the Board Secretary
Minutes of Board and Committee Closed
ALL DISTRICTS
Reconvene in regular session
DISTRICT 1
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
The Boards convened in closed session
at 9:00 p.m. pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9. Confidential
the Board(s) of Directors have been
Government Code Section 54957.2 and
in the Official Book of Confidential
Meetings.
At 10:07 p.m. the Boards reconvened
in regular session.
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to Wednesday,
September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of
reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93
sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer
service charges, if necessary. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992.
DISTRICT 2
Approving agreement with
Richard Josephattaglia, Trustee
of the Richard Joseph Battaglia
Trust providing for dedication and
granting of new easements necessary
for Rehabilitation of Cypress
Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract
No. -9-R1
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby
adopts Resolution No. 92-128-2,
approving and authorizing execution
of agreement with Richard Joseph
Battaglia, Trustee of the Richard
Joseph Battaglia Trust dated
February 27, 1986, providing for
dedication and granting of new
easements necessary for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer,
Contract No. 2-9-R1, at no cost to the District, and quitclaiming the old
easement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of
these minutes.
-19-
09/09/92
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to Wednesday,
September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of
reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93
sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer
service charges, if necessary. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to Wednesday,
September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of
reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93
sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer
service charges, if necessary. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5'be adjourned to Wednesday,
September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of
reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93
sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer
service charges, if necessary. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992.
`,.) DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to Wednesday,
September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of
reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93
sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer
service charges, if necessary. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to Wednesday,
September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose of
reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93
sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer
service charges, if necessary. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992.
-20-
09/09/92
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to Wednesday, l J
September 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., for a public meeting for the purpose ofd
reviewing District reports and state budget reports affecting the 1992-93
sewer service charges and consideration of ordinance to increase sewer
service charges, if necessary. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m.,
September 16, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file request for
annexation and authorizing That the petition from The Irvine
initiation of proceedings re Company requesting annexation of
proposed Annexation No. 1 - 54.52 acres of territory to the
San Joaquin Hills Road Annexation District in the vicinity of San
Joaquin Hills Road and Newport Coast
Drive in unincorporated County territory, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution
No. 92-129-14, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory
to the District (proposed Annexation No. i - San Joaquin Hills Road
Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 14). Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Director Don R. Roth and Director Roger R. Stanton requested that their
abstentions from voting on this item be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned to 7:30 p.m.,
September 16, 1992. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
10:07 p.m., September 9, 1992.
1 a
--ZAIW�Ae�
Assistant SecpMrVFf the Boards
of Directors4ff County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11,
13 and 14
-21-
m
X
f�
i
FU 9199
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AF43
CCUN7Y SANITATICN DISTRICTS OF GRANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS
PAID 08/12/92 POSTING DATE
08/12/92
WARRANT N0.
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
123917
AC TECH CCPPANY
$629741.98
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
123918
ASP ANALISIS
$880000
ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS
123919
ACADEPIC FRESS
S282.31
LAB SUPPLIES
123920
ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC
$310900
LAB SERVICES
123921
ACCU - SLUDGE
S622.52
SLUDGE SAMPLER
123922
ACTTCN RENTALS
S29602.00
EQUIPMENT RENTALS
123923
ADVANCO CENSIRUC70RE INC
$9069462.00
CONSTRUCTION P1-34-3, P1-35-2, J-22
123924
AIR. PRODUCTS L CHEMICALS T
9229571.18
O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN SYST H.O.8-9-89
123925
ALCORN FENCE CO
$29160.00
FENCING
123926
ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT
S129500.00
ASPHALT
123927
ALFHACA2
S19233.27
SPECIALTY GASES
12399'8
HERPAN-FHINNEY-KCCMUR
1109349.39
MACHINE PARTS
123929
AVER SCCIETY OF CIVIL ENCR
$995000
PUBLICATION
123930
ROBCO INC L/OR AMERICAN SEALS
$467.42
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
123931
AMERICAN SIGMA
S19168.31
OPERATING SUPPLIES
123932
AVER SCCIETY FCR PICROBIOLC
$312@00
PUBLICATION
1239:3
APERICAN TYPE CLLTURE CCLLECTN
S228.75
LAB SUPPLIES
123934
ANCPEWtS CLASS CC
S7*201.80
LAB SUPPLIES
123935
AQUATIC TESTING LABORATORY
S4 000.00
LAB SERVICES
123936
ARATEX SERVICES INC
S39553.71
UNIFORM RENTALS
123937
ARIZCNA INSTRUMENT
$29157.12
INSTRUMENT PARTS
123938
RALPF U ATKINSCN
S19417.07
PUMP
1215.9
RANCCLPF AUSTIN CO
$849.94
TUBING
123940
BKK LAW ILL
$79214098
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
123941
BRW SAFETY L SUPPLY
S19169.45
SAFETY SUPPLIES
123942
BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE
$32.00
BACKFLOW TESTING
123943
RALLIN CCNSTRLCTICN CO
S69390000
MANHOLE COVERS
123944
BARCLAYS LAY FLELISNERS
$168.38
PUBLICATIONS
123545
EA71EFY SFECIAL71ES
$705.66
BATTERIES
123946
BAXTER CIAGNOS7ICS INC
S159373.42
LAB SUPPLIES
123947
EECKMAN INSTRUMENTS
$19200.00
SERVICE AGREEMENT
123948
PIO TECH NLT• INC
S163.71
SERVICE AGREEMENT
123949
PCFHRINGEF MANNHEIM
$101.29
LAB SUPPLIES
123950
BP.INCERSCN CCPF
S59954.00
CONSTRUCTION J-19-2
123951
BRCWN 8 CALCWELL CONSULTING
S71 023.72
ENGINEERING SERVICES J-11-1
123952
BUDGET JANITORIAL
S1r650.O0
JANITORIAL SERVICES
123953
BUILDEROS EMPORIUM
S216.80
HARDWARE
1239!4
RURKE ENGINEERING CC
S809.58
ELECTRIC PARTS
1239°5
CARY G STREEC
S19846.71
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
1239°6
PL7LER FIFER CCPPANY
S72.38
OFFICE SUPPLIES
123957
C M I
S29375.42
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
123958
SUMMIT SOLUTIONS• INC
$454.23
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
123959
CAL -PAC CHEMICAL CO INC
S201.90
CHEMICALS
123960
CALTRCL INC
S39284.38
INSTRUMENT PARTS
123961
JCHN R CALAFPICE FhC
1189388.55
OCEAN MONITORING M.0.11-14-90
123962
CALIFCRNIA AUTO CCLLISION INC
S844.37
TRUCK PARTS
FUND NC 919Q
w JT CIST WCRKINC CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 FAGF 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CCUKIY
SAN17ATICK DISTRICTS OF CRANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID f'8/12/92 POSTING DATE
08/12/92
WARRANT N0.
VEhDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
123963
CALIFCRNIA AUTOMATIC GATE
S90R.74
SERVICE AGREEMENT
123964
CALIFCRKIA JCURhAL INC
S167.00
TRAINING REGISTRATION
123965
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC FINANCE
$545.00
PUBLICATION
123966
CENTER FOR STUDY OF LAW R POLI
$64.65
PUBLICATIONS
1239E7
CEKTLRY SAFETY 1NST 6 SUFP
S69374.56
SAFETY SUPPLIES
123968
ChEVRCN LEA INC
$5+391.0°
OIL & GREASE
123969
Ch1LCREKIE HCSFITAL CF O.C.
$154.54
REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
123970
SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING
S89563.42
BUILDING MATERIALS
123971
CLEAN -EX FAPER & CHEMICAL
$407055
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
123972
TIE COEE GRCUP
S127.15
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
123973
CCPFASS ELECTRCKICS CCRP
$54.35
INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
123974
CCPFUSA• IKC.
$19220.15
COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE
123975
CONAPUOS PHOTOGRAPHY
S269.38
PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
123976
CONSCLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST
$89010.74
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
123977
CCKTINEK70L AIR TOCLS INC
$398090
TOOLS
123978
CCCPEP IhCLSTRIES INC
S139728.16
COMPRESSOR PARTS
123979
COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC
$615679
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
1239SO
CRANE VEYOR CORP
$74.21
SAFETY SUPPLIES
1239[l
THE REGENTS CF THE UKIVERS17Y
$69145.00
NWRI PROJECT FEES
123582
CA CEFT CF HEALTh SERVICES
S49808.00
REGISTRATION - LAB ACCREDITATION
123513
STATE CF CALIFCRNIA
S13.306.00
STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
123984
DE AKZA CORFCRATIOK
S150.00
EQUIPMENT RENTALS
123985
DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS
$189953
LAB SUPPLIES
123986
DEW -PAR SALES R SERVICE
S536.55
MANHOLE PARTS
1239A7
DEZURIK AND/CR CS CO
S19715.39
VALVE PARTS
1239PS
CIATEC fh%IRCKPEKTAL
$39894.79
CHEMICALS
1235E9
GIFILIHFC ASSCCIATES
S19224.58
PRINTING
123990
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP
$39674.36
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
123991
DISCO PRINT COMPANY
$132.01
OFFICE SUPPLIES
123952
DOR.ADC EKIERFRISES INC
$219459.40
PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS
123953
RCRER7 F [RIVER ASSCC
$39700.01
BOND -COMP INSURANCE
12355E
CLNh EC61RCS CCRP
S539.96
PAINT SUPPLIES
123995
CYKATECI LABCRATCRIES
S189012.71
LAB EQUIPMENT
123996
EASTMAN INC
$4077.65
OFFICE SUPPLIES
123997
DONALD ELDER
$29166.00
REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
123998
EKCHAKTER INC
$5.040.00
OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91
123959
FALCCh CISPCSAL SERVICE
$39640.00
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
124(CC
JChN B FALKEKSIEIK FE
S3v400.0C
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16
1240G]
FARR SALES 9 SERVICE.
S8017.03
FILTERS
124602
FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP
$316#00
AIR FREIGHT
124043
FERRELLGAS
S102.07
PROPANE
124004
FISChEP I PCRTER CO
3982.7E
CHLORINATION PARTS
124005
FISHER SCIENTIFIC CC
S169.3P
LAB SUPPLIES
124CC6
FISChE 1h;1RLPEK7S
$2229023.19
LAB EQUIPMENT M.O.2-19-92
124067
FLC-SYSTEMS
$6.350*81
PUMP PARTS
124008
CLIFFORD A FOPKERT
$6045.85
SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-12-91
c c �
rn
X
W
FU( C 9199
JT CI5T WCRXINC CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 FAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CCUNTY
SANITATICN
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08/12/92
POSTING DATE
08/12/92
WARRANT NC.
VFNCCR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
1240C9
FCLNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA
566.64
FILM
124010
CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY
$4*316.80
WATER USE
124n11
FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT
$316.30
PAINT SUPPLIES
124012
FCx INDUSTRIAL SALES
5248.46
OFFICE FURNITURE
124013
GPC TRUCK I BUS CROUF
513*215.54
VEHICLE
124C14
CST• INC.
51s001.84
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
124PI5
GA NA FL LLPRER CO
5516.86
HARDWARE
124016
GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY
$39454.73
CHEMICALS
124417
GENERAL ELECTRIC CC
$840*30
ELECTRIC REPAIRS
124018
GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CC.
$804.52
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
124015
GIFRLiCt-PI7CFELL INC
5366.71
MECHANICAL PARTS
124R20
GRAPFIC CCNTRGLS
S347094
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
124021
DON GREEK 9 ASSOCIATES
$169606.UC
SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-12-91
124022
HAAKFR EGLIFPENT CC
$19679959
VALVE
124023
MACH CCPFANY
$389.28
CHEMICALS
224024
HARPIKGTCP INCLSTRIAL FLAS71
529.09
VALVE
124025
HAULAWAY CONTAINERS
$39805.00
TRASH REMOVAL
124026
EG HELLEROS SON INC
$98.72
TOOLS
124027
HEWLETT FACKARC
$39665.59
SERVICE AGREEMENTS
124028
HICKS INC. FIBERGLASS CCRP
$100000
FIBERGLASS REPAIRS
124029
HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC
5674.73
MECHANICAL PARTS
124030
HORIZON HIGH REACH E EQUIP
$179048
TRUCK PARTS
124011
J.T. HORVATH I ASSOC.
S39000000
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17
124032
RS PUGHES CC INC
519268.06
SAFETY SUPPLIES
124033
HUNTER CCFFCR/TICK
5193579302.32
CONSTRUCTION J-19-1
124034
C17Y CF FUNTINGTON 6EACH
920.41
WATER USE
124035
HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA
5266.25
OFFICE SUPPLIES
124936
HYPPOTEK INC
589345.55
OIL
124037
iMt INDLSTRiES
5237.28
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
12403P
THE IDEA EANK
5111.13
PUBLICATION
124039
IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL
$269271.98
FERRIC CHLORIDE H.O.11-14-90
124040
INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRGOLCTS
5935.54
CONNECTORS
124041
1NFCTRIEVE
$51.00
PUBLICATION
124042
INCRAP PAPER
S39349.52
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124043
INTERMOUNTAIN SCIENTIFIC CORP
5275.63
LAB SUPPLIES
124944
PACTEL TELETRAC
5376.81
NOTEBOOK COMPUTER RENTAL
124045
INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEPS
$2.306.07
BATTERIES
124046
1RVINE FINCH WATER DISTRICT
5198799448.27
SEWAGE CAPACITY PURCHASE M.O.6-10-92
124047
IRVINE RANCH LATER CISTRICT
$124.27
WATER USE
124048
JLA CRECI7 CCRP
5145.32
MICROFICHE READER LEASE
124049
GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP
519200.29
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
224050
JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO
$49868.23
INSTRUMENT PARTS
1240P1
JCHNSTONE SUPPLY
$64.38
ELECTRIC PARTS
1240E2
KARS• ACVANCEC MATERIALS INC
54044.00
LAB SERVICES
1240!3
THE KEIlk CCPFANIES
$824.50
ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35
124P54
KELLY SERVICES
5705.33
TEMPORARY SERVICES
m
X
1--r
tz
n
I
FUND NC
WARRANT N0.
1240ce
124056
124057
124n!8
1240C-9
124C(C
124061
124062
124063
124064
124065
124066
124067
124168
1240E9
124070
124071
124072
124073
124074
124075
12407E
124077
124078
124079
124080
124081
124C8d'
124083
124084
124C85
124OPS
124CE7
124088
124089
124n90
124051
124052
124C53
124094
124095
124096
124097
124098
124099
124100
C
9199 - JT CIST WCRKINC CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CCUNIY
SANITATICh DISTRICTS OF CRANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID U8/12/92 POSTING DATE
08/12/92
VFhDCR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
KING REAFING IhC
S299.61
MACHINE SUPPLIES
KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES
$19309.42
PAINT SUPPLIES
MARTIN KORDICK SR
S39264.60
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9
LAP ENGINEERING PLASTICS
S29885.71
REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
LA CELLLLAR IELEFhChE CC
S481.38
SERVICE AGREEMENTS
LA LIOLIE HAhCLING SYSTEMS
S713.75
MECHANICAL PARTS
LAB SUPPCRT
S585.06
TEMPORARY SERVICES
LAYMAN9 JONES A DYES LAWYEPS
S89967.01
LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER INDUSTRIES
ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION
5200.00
PUBLICATIONS
LEGI-TECV
S550.00
COMPUTER SERVICES
LTMIICRCLE CCRF
S124.68
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
SOCC-LYNCh CCRP
S878.12
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
MFS
$95.90
PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
MACOMCO
S668.85
SERVICE AGREEMENT
MAINTENANCE PROOUCTS INC
529991.52
MECHANICAL PARTS
MANDIC M(IORS
$120.00
TOWING SERVICES
MANHCLE ACJVS7IKC
S89910000
MANHOLE ADJUSTING SERVICES
MANLEY9S BOILEP REPAIR C09 INC
S39515.8u
BOILER REPAIRS
MARVAC ELECTRONICS
S19.50
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
MATT - ChLCR INC
$19235.22
CHLORINATION PARTS
D A MA711-ELS R ASSCCIATES
S19764.00
INSTRUMENT
CCN PALPEP
S59790.00
OCEAN MONITORING
MC AFEE ASSCCIATES
S59469075
COMPUTER SOFTWARE LICENSE
MCKENNA ENGR R EQUIP
$196.01
PUMP PARTS
MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS INC
$419.86
INSTRUMENT PARTS
HICRCSDFI CORF
$159.00
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
FIhhESOTA LESTERh VISUAL PPES.
S545.58
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MIICI-ELL INSTRLMENT CC
S372.00
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
MCDICCN9 INC
S943.00
ENGINEERING SERVICES
MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES
$99982900
LAB SERVICES
MOTICN INDUSTRIES INC
$19159.00
MECHANICAL PARTS
MUDGE RCSE GUTHRIE ALEXAkCE
S79126.42
FINANCIAL SERVICES M.0.3-13-91
NATICNAL SAFETY CCLNCIL
$69.35
SAFETY FILM RENTAL
NATICNAL LATER RESEARCH
S249143.00
WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE GRANT
NEWARK ELECTRONICS
S698.50
INSTRUMENT PARTS
CITY OF NEWPORT bLACH
S4.25
WATER USE
DX SYSTEMS CC
5219577.68
CHLORINE M-0.10-9-91
CRANCE C(LNTY ALTC PARTS C
$40.81
TRUCK PARTS
CPANCE C(LhTY CFEPICAL CC
129645.9E
CHEMICALS
GRANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CC.
S19587.39
FITTINGS
ORITEX CORP
S19200.19
MECHANICAL PARTS
OXYGEN SERVICE
S760.5l
SPECIALTY GASES
PC SYSTEMS DESIGN
S483.80
COMPUTER HARDWARE
PCL FACK)CINC
S316.95
REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
PST
S434.61
MECHANICAL PARTS
PACIFIC PARTS
S349.01
INSTRUMENT PARTS
m
X
bd
A
I
Cn
•/ 4
FU dC 9199
- JT DIST 1CPKINE CAFI AL 1
PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY
SANITATION
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08/12/92
POSTING DATE
08/12/92
WARRANT NC.
VENCOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
124101
PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CC
5658.51
SAFETY SUPPLIES
124102
PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS
$272.14
TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
124103
PAK LEST
519319.3A
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124104
PARACCN CAELE
536.78
CABLE SERVICES
124105
PEPKIR-ELDER CCPFCRATION
5833.22
LAB SUPPLIES
1241JE
PIMA GRC SYSTEMS INC
$2479161960
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91
124107
FLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE
$44.08
HARDWARE
124108
POLYMETRICS• INC.
$109423.14
EQUIPMENT RENTALS
124109
PCLYPURE INC
5249123.05
CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
124110
PCSITIVE FCRML•LATCRS• INC.
$241.50
CHEMICALS
124111
PREMIER PRINTING CORP.
$49834.75
PRINTING
124112
HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE
5262.50
ICE
124113
THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO.
$49720.00
INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91
124114
0UES7ROR CCRF
5179157.00
LAB EQUIPMENT
124115
RJE IKTERNATICRALe INC
5732.31
LAB SUPPLIES
12411E
RD SvslEpz INC
$29222@00
SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS
124117
PECYC INC
S440840082
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-13-91
124118
REGIONAL MEDIA LABORATORY
1641.57
LAB SUPPLIES
124119
MCJUNKIN-FEPUBLIC SUFPLY
S1.893.97
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
124120
RCYAL BLEIRESS FCRMS INC
$534.86
PRINTING
124121
RCYCE IRSIRLPERT
$232.38
INSTRUMENT PARTS
124122
RYAN-NERCO
519777.88
METER
124123
JOSEPH T RYERSON 4 SON IN
$464008
METAL
124124
SAFETY-KLEEN COPE
$173840
PARTS CLEANER
124125
SANTA FE IRCUSTRIAL PLASTICS
$39907972
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
124126
SCPUIRG APERICA
$309.46
PUMP PARTS
124127
SEA COAST DESICKS
5118.52
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
124128
CITY OF SEAL BEACH
$285950
WATER USE
124129
SEL SALES INC
5752.34
METER
124130
SHAMPCCK SUPFLY
$118039
HARDWARE
124231
SHURELUCK SALES
S149163989
HARDWARE
1241!2
SIGMA CHEPICAL CO
540.26
PUBLICATIONS
124133
SKILL PATHS INC.
$198000
TRAINING REGISTRATION
124134
SKYPARK WALK-IN MECICAL CLI
$19614000
PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
124139
SPITE PIPE A SLPPLY IKC
$251.80
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
1241!6
SCLTFERN CALIF EDISCN CC
53319579.82
POWER
124137
STAMCN 2 SPASSOFF FE
$39920.00
ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.3-11-92
124138
WESTALLOY INC
S19391.41
WELDING SUPPLIES
124139
STAPLES
589.09
OFFICE SUPPLIES
124140
STAR TCCL R SUPPLY CC
$69087.88
TOOLS
124141
STERLIRE ART
593.02
ART SUPPLIES
124142
STROPPO M PRIKTIRG
53 028.15
PRINTING
124143
SUMMIT STEEL
5737.4C
METAL
124144
SUN ELECTRIC CORP
5232.37
TRUCK PARTS
324145
SUPER ICE CCRP
$81.76
LAB SUPPLIES
124146
SUP-LITE ECRPCRA71CK
5551.34
MECHANICAL PARTS
m
X
S
Gd
--I
0
FUND NO 9199
- JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/07/92 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAIC
O6/12192 POSTING DATE
08/12/92
WARRANT NO*
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
124147
SYSTAT
$205.LD
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
124148
TCH ASSCCIATES
S42loOD
LAB SUPPLIES
124149
TAYLCR-CLNN PFG CCPPANY
$390*42
ELECTRIC CART PARTS
124150
TEKDRAULICS
S59064932
MACHINE REPAIRS
124151
TELAUTOGRAPH CORPORATION
5168.35
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
124152
THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL
$184944
INSTRUMENT PARTS
1241f3
THCMASON PECNAN'ICAL CORP
519600.00
PUMP REPAIRS
1241!4
THCFPSCN INCUST41AL SLPFLY
522.82
MECHANICAL PARTS
1241FE
TCNYIS LOCK R SAFE SERVICE
$96.55
LOCKSMITH SERVICES
124156
TOYO LANCSCAPING CO
519555902
CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.11-13-91
124157
TRANSCHEM
519043.68
REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
124158
TRUCK K AUTO SUPPLY INC
5230.71
TRUCK PARTS
1241£9
THE LNISCLPCE CCRF
$363.12
OFFICE SUPPLIES
124160
UNITEC PARCEL SERVICE
S315019
PARCEL SERVICES
1241E1
VCC IEE71KG
579000.00
EMISSIONS TESTING
124162
V6R SCIENi1FIC
$69848037
LAB SUPPLIES
124163
VS SYSTEMS INC
$155*90
INSTRUMENT PARTS
124164
VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO
$19145*79
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
1241E'
VARIAN .ANALYTICAL INSTRLPEN7S
519123.53
LAB SUPPLIES
1241E6
VILLACE NLRSERIES
S60.64
LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
1241E7
HAY60TF9 TNCCRPCPATEC
5805.97
OFFICE FURNITURE
124168
WESTERN STATES ChEMICAL SUPPLY
$509183*96
CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-8-90
124169
WESTIN ENGINEERING
129167.29
ENGINEERING SERVICES
124170
WESCO
S21541940
ELECTRIC PARTS
124171
WHATPAN LAB SALES INC
525.85
LAB SUPPLIES
124172
WHITNEY PACHINERY INC
$19508*58
TRUCK PARTS
124173
6AVEFLY9 INC
$329993
LAB SUPPLIES
124174
XERCK CCRP
$89948980
COPIER LEASES
124175
ZIE6ARTH A ALPER/C.S. ALPER
S409000oOO
..----------------
CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1
TOTAL CLAIMS FAIL O0/12/92
$599249171*35
m
X
2
bd
1
V
k� a
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 08/07/92 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08/12/92 POSTING DATE 08/12/92
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND
$595.00
#2 OPER FUND
$9,143.84
#2 CAP PAC FUND
$6,022.15
#3 OPER FUND
$24,773.87
#5 OPER FUND
$10,752.02
#5 CAP FAC FUND
$4,831.90
#7 OPER FUND
$2,917.07
#7 CAP FAC FUND
$1,882,094.30
#11 OPER FUND
$6,691.01
#14 OPER FUND
$82.24
#14 CAP FAC FUND
$6,869.80
#5&6 OPER FUND
$203.65
#6&7 OPER FUND
$3,813.12
#7&14 OPER FUND
$170.39
JT OPER FUND
$1,003,566.85
CORF
$2,815,662.45
SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS
$0.00
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND
$145,981.49
--------------
$5,924,171.15
c
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE I
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CGUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAIL 08/26/92 POSTING DATE 08/26/92
WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
124193 AG TECH COMPANY $729305.35 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
124154 ASR ANALYSIS $29380.00 ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS
124155 A T 6 T $31660.89 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
124196 AMERICAN TELEFHONE S TELEGRAPh $19504001 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
124197 A T 9 T $380.04 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
124198 AYWA/I+PCF RESIDUALS MGMT S29.93 LAB SUPPLIES
124199 ACACEPIC FRESS S389.51 LAB SUPPLIES
1242C0 AIR COLC SLFFLY INC $646.50 AIR CONDITIONER SUPPLIES
124201 AIR FRCDLCTS R CHEMICAL IN S169815000 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN SYST M.O.8-9-89
124202 RCBCO 116C VCR APERICAN SEALS S59.22 PUMP PARTS
124203 AMERSHAP CCRP S344.80 LAB SUPPLIES
1242C4 KE7EPA INC $19052.10 MECHANICAL PARTS
124205 ANAHEIM SEWER CCNSTRUCTION S29009.85 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS
124206 ABC LABORATORIES S19630.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
124207 ART SUPPLY WHSE $87.59 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES
124208 DENTAL INSURANCE CONSULT. S48.00 DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATOR
124209 RAU SAFEIY I SUPPLY $19935.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES
12421C EANANA ELLEFRINT $39393013 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES
124211 8 BATEPAA S600.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
124212 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $185.82 BATTERIES
124213 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC i109259.25 LAB SUPPLIES
124214 J 3 H PEACE INC $222.85 LAB SUPPLIES
124215 BERTECH $526.06 ELECTRIC PARTS
124216 BCLSA RACIATCR SERVICE $857.55 TRUCK REPAIRS
1242I7 RON-A-RUES $208.88 TRUCK PARTS
124218 DUILDER•S EMPORIUM $256.11 HARDWARE/LUMBER
124219 BUSH ANC ASSCCIATES INC $19580000 SURVEY SERVICES M.0.6-10-92
124220 CARY 6 SIP.EEC S59455.92 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
124221 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY $737.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES
124222 CEPA $75.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
124223 CH2M HILL $699.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
124224 SUMMIT SOLLTICNS• INC $454.23 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
124225 CS CCMPANY S101.77 GAUGE
124226 CACDYLAK SYSTEMS INC $193.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES
124227 CAL -GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. $720.29 LAB SUPPLIES
124228 CALTROL INC $10.180050 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
124229 CALIFCRNIA AUTO CCLLISION INC S19403094 TRUCK REPAIRS
124230 CENTLRY SAFETY INST S SUFV $49662.36 SAFETY SUPPLIES
1242!1 CHRCPE CFANKSFAFI INC S570.00 FITTINGS
124232 SOUTHERN CAL PA TE R IA L HANDLING $39002.99 BUILDING MATERIALS
124233 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT S59881.78 SAFETY SUPPLIES
1242'_4 COLICH AND SONS S20 959291.00 CONSTRUCTION I-9
124235 CCLTCN EOLIPPEAT CC $485.77 TRUCK PARTS
1242.6 CCPPLIER FRCDLCTS PLLS $166.47 OFFICE SUPPLIES
124237 CCPPLSA9 INC. $39831.82 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE
124238 CONARDOS PHOTOGRAPHY S269.38 PHOTO SERVICES
m
X
2
.-r
bCl
Gd
I
N
FU( _ 9199
- JT DIST 1(FKIA@ CAFIIAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08/26/92 POSTING DATE
08/26/92
WARRAK1 NC.
VEhCOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
124239
COANELL CM PARTS / DIV
S29744.22
TRUCK PARTS
124240
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST
$59254.95
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
124241
CONTINENTAL AIR TOCLS INC
S19840.97
TOOLS
124242
CCATIAEATAL CHEMICAL CC
$29155.00
CHLORINE M.0.9-9-91
1.24243
CCATRACICFIS ECCK STCRE
$1►213.50
PUBLICATIONS
124244
CCCPER INCUSTRIES INC
5378.17
COMPRESSOR PARTS
124245
COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY
S732.65
TRUCK PARTS
124246
CCUNTY 6fCLESALE. ELECTRIC
t328.29
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
124247
VERAE CCM CC* REAL ESTATE APPR
$79500.00
APPRAISAL SERVICES DIST 6
124248
CHARLES F CRCWLEY CC
$176@59
PUMP PARTS
124249
CROWN FENCE CO
$855000
FENCING
124250
CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW MAINT.
$29250.00
WINDOW CLEANING
1242°1
DME INC
$555.07
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
124252
DAMES S M(CRE
S249526.53
ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-3
1242°3
DAKIELS TIRE SERVICE
S19332.58
TIRES
124254
MICHAEL K CASKALAKIS
S69697.50
REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
124255
DE GUELLE 6 SONS GLASS CO
$69.08
GLASS
124256
DELL COMPUTER CORP
S287.80
COMPUTER REPAIRS
1242E7
DE7URIK AND/CP CS CO
$139717.07
VALVE PARTS
1242a8
CTATEC M IRCKMENTAL
t19936.97
CHEMICALS
1242!9
CICKSCNS
S859.84
APPLIANCE
124260
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP
t673.46
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
124261
DUNN EDWARDS CORP
$69012911
PAINT SUPPLIES
124262
OURO-SENSE CORP
S749.57
MECHANICAL PARTS
124263
E.C.S.
S252.00
PUBLICATION
124264
EIL INSTRUMENTS INC
S75.19
INSTRUMENT PARTS
124265
EASTMAN INC
S69534.04
OFFICE SUPPLIES
124266
ECOANALYSIS INC
S961.76
OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91
124267
ELECTRIC EEL MAAUFACTURIKG C
S182.48
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
124PEB
ENCHANTER IKC
$59040.00
OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91
1242E5
E%VIPCbET1CS9 1KC
S29396.40
LAB SUPPLIES
124270
EIT
$99701.36
INSTRUMENT PARTS
124271
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC
$646.50
LAB SERVICES
124272
EUPOTHERM RECCRDERS INC
$339.48
INSTRUMENT PARTS
124273
FST SAAC ANC CRAVEL INC
S326.37
ROAD BASE
124274
MARSfALL FAIRRES
S78.08
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
124275
FALCCA CISPCSAL SERVICE
S99080.26
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
124276
JOHN F FALKENSTEIN PE
$39400000
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16
124277
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
S267.25
AIR FREIGHT
124278
FIRST COMFANY
$256.45
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124279
FISCFER A PCRTER CO
$49177.71
CHLORINATION PARTS
1242E0
FISHER SCIEKIIFIC CC
S371.74
LAB SUPPLIES
124281
FISCAS INSTRUMENTS
S109635.00
SERVICE AGREEMENT
124282
FLO-SYSTEMS
S336.58
PUMP PARTS
124283
FCLSOM LAKE FORC
S169987.44
TRUCK
124284
FCMEECRES CCMFAKY
S228.97
OFFICE SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199
- JT DIST WERKING CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CCUATY
SANITATICN DISTRICTS OF CRANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID G8/26/92 POSTING DATE
G8/26/92
WARRANT N0.
VENDOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
124285
FCUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA
$10.33
FILM
124286
FCLNIAIN tiALLEY PAINT
519796.57
PAINT SUPPLIES
124287
FCM INOUS1R1AL SALES
529261.59
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124288
FREEDOM IMAGING
$123.76
SERVICE AGREEMENT
124289
BUD FREY
$21.16
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
124250
CITY OF FULLERTCN
596.91
WATER USE
124291
CPC TRUCK I EUS CRCUF
5139215.54
TRUCK
124252
CANAFL LLPBER CC
$19113.4P
BUILDING MATERIALS
124293
GARRATT-CALLAtAN COPFANY
5387.90
CHEMICALS
124294
GATES FIPERGLASS INSTALLERS
$19600,00
FIBERGLASS PIPE
124295
GENERAL TELEPHONE CC
259380.38
TELEPHONE SERVICES
124296
GIERLICP•P17CPELL INC
529443.77
MECHANICAL PARTS
124297
GLCBAL CCPPUTER SUFPLIES
5358.31
OFFICE SUPPLIES
124298
GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS
595.9D
CAMERA
124299
DCN GREEN 6 ASSOCIATES
$189959000
SURVEY SERVICES M.O.6-10-92
124300
HACH CCPFANY
$881.45
LAB SUPPLIES
1243t1
FRED A FARFER
S19500000
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
1243E2
HARRINGTCN INCUSTRIAL PLASTI
$331.78
FITTINGS
124303
HATCH 6 KIRK INC
$442.00
MECHANICAL PARTS
124304
FL HAWN CO INC
5154.19
FILTERS
124305
HILTI INC
S29004075
ELECTRIC PARTS
1243t6
HI SIANCAFE ALICPCTIVE
5370.25
TRUCK REPAIRS
124307
HCEFER SCIENTIFIC INSTR.
519262.58
LAB SUPPLIES
124308
HOCRBIGER CVS CALIF INC
$29107.70
COMPRESSOR PARTS
124309
HOKE CONTROLS DIV/HONE• INC.
5362.21
VALVE
124310
J.T. hORVATH I ASSOC.
$29100900
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17
124311
RS HLGFE: CC INC
519124.31
PAINT SUPPLIES
124312
HUNTING7CN BEACP RUBBER STA
574.24
OFFICE SUPPLIES
124313
HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN C
$129.10
BICYCLE PARTS
124334
IMO INDUSTRIES
$19692.21
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
124315
IRP PECHANALYSIS
5255.08
INSTRUMENT
124316
TPE ICEA SANK
$144080
PUBLICATION
124311
1PFERIAL &EST CHEMICAL
5139004.18
FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-14-90
124318
INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS
$19201.57
CONNECTORS
124319
INSIDE E.P.A.
5137.25
PUBLICATION
124320
INTEPPOLNIAIN SCIENTIFIC CCRP
570.5l
LAB SUPPLIES
124321
IN£TPLHEN7 SPECIALISTS
$39660.00
INSTRUMENT RENTAL
124322
1NTECRATEC BUSINESS INT9 INC
$959114.88
LAB FURNITURE M.O.4-8-92
124323
PACTEL TELETRAC
525.00
TELEPHONE SERVICES
124324
INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS
$243941
BATTERIES
124325
IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT
$4.90
WATER USE
124326
GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SbPP
$779.49
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124327
JIP9S SLSFENSICN SERVICE
$30.00
VEHICLE REPAIRS
124328
JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
$748.71
ELECTRIC PARTS
124329
JONES CHEMICALS INC
569274.74 _
CHEMICALS
124E30
JCNES INCUSTRIAL HARDWARE C
S169.28
TOOL
t�
•
FU( 9199
- JT DIST WCRKIhG CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID
08/26/92 POSTING DATE
08/26/92
WARRANT NC.
VENDCR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
124331
KARS• ADVANCED MATERIALS INC
S49995.00
LAB SERVICES
124332
KING BEARING INC
S40803014
MACHINE SUPPLIES
1243!3
KNCX INCLSTRIAL SUFFLIES
S19423.74
TOOLS
124334
LAY CFFICES CF RCEERT L LAVOIE
S144.01
LEGAL SERVICES - FLORES
V. DALEY
124335
LEARN KEY
$54.95
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
124336
LEWCO ELECTRIC CO
S302.92
TRUCK REPAIRS
124337
LIFECCM-SAFETY SERVICE SUFPL
$107.75
SAFETY SUPPLIES
124338
SCCC-LYNCh CCRP
S702.72
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124339
MPS
S203.32
PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
124340
MACOMCO
$316.07
SERVICE AGREEMENT
124341
NAG SYSTEMS
S559.02
INSTRUMENT
124342
MAINTENAhCE PROCUCTS INC
$396.52
MECHANICAL PARTS
124343
PANCIC PCTCRS
$52.50
TOWING SERVICES
124344
MARVAC ELECTRCNICS
S47.45
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
124345
MATT - CHLOR INC
S338.88
CHLORINATION PARTS
124346
DON PAUPER
S29640.00
OCEAN MONITORING
124347
MCBAIh INSTRUMENTS
S29259.77
INSTRUMENTS
12434E
PEASLPEPEP1 VARIABLES
$985.19
INSTRUMENT PARTS
124349
PERICIAN EIAGNCSTICS INC
$273,00
LAB SUPPLIES
124350
MES COMPANY
$189826.43
MECHANICAL REPAIRS
124351
MIDWAY PFG 9 MACHINING
S99890037
MECHANICAL PARTS
1243!2
PINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CC
$49291917
SAFETY SUPPLIES
1241!!
MINNESOTA tESIERN VISLAL FRES.
S437.94
VIDEO SUPPLIES
124354
PISSICN AERASIVE SUPPLIES
$260.21
HARDWARE
124355
MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO
S19254.00
ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT
124356
MLAOEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION
$1719252.00
CONSTRUCTION 2-30
124357
NATICNAL SAFETY COLNCIL
$191.18
SAFETY FILM RENTAL
1243°8
NATICNAL SANITAPY SLFPLY
S109.04
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124359
NEW ERUNSLICK SCIENTIFIC
S49949060
LAB SUPPLIES
124360
NEWARK ELECTRONICS
$13.03
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
124361
NGRTHWESTERN CARBON
S8*449.60
CHEMICALS
1243E2
NOVELL
S425.62
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
1243E3
Ox SYSIEPS CC
$519105.82
CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91
124364
OLYPPUS CCRP
$239705.00
INSTRUMENT
124365
ORACLE CORPORATION
$550.00
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
124366
ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO
$39979.02
HYDROCHLORIC ACID
1243E7
CRANCE VALVE R FITTING CC.
S19458.78
FITTINGS
1243EB
CVVGEN SERVICE
S2v438.56
SPECIALTY GASES
124369
CSDOC SELF -FUNDED MEDICAL I
S1J0r000.00
PREMIUM ADVANCE
124370
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
$831.29
REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP
INSURANCE
124371
PC SYSTEMS DESIGN
S900618.57
COMPUTER HARDWARE M.O.6-10-92
124372
PACIFIC FARTS
$29589.73
COMPRESSOR PARTS
124373
PACIFIC SAFETY EGLIFFENT CC
$792.44
SAFETY SUPPLIES
124374
PACIFIC EELL
S274.38
TELEPHONE SERVICES
124375
PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C
S68.40
RENTAL EQUIPMENT
124376
PAK LEST
S130.97
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
m
X
to
tz
I
Ln
FUND NC 9199
- JT DIST WCRKING CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS FAIC 08/26/92 POSTING DATE
08/26/92
WARRANT NC.
VENOCR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
124377
PALMIERI• TYLER9 WIENER*
S39373.00
LEGAL SERVICES - OIL WELLS
124378
FARTS LNLIMITED
S19296.00
TRUCK PARTS
124379
RCV PENCERGRAFT
$460.70
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
1243E0
FICKIICK FAPEP
S350.45
OFFICE SUPPLIES
124381
PIMA GRC SYSTEPS INC
$1179483.28
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91
124382
PIONEER BANK
S169062.40
CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-34-3
124383
PLASTIC INDUSTRIES
S149.34
PLASTIC BOTTLES
1243E4
PCLYPURE INC
S219046.00
CHEMICALS
124385
PCRE71CS CCRP
S607.96
LAB SUPPLIES
124386
PCWER ELECTRC SUPPLY CO
S783.62
ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
124387
PREMIUM CONNECTING POINT
S231.66
OFFICE SUPPLIES
124388
PREMIER PRINTING CORP.
$431.00
PRINTING
1243E9
HAROLC PPiMRCSF ICE
$308.00
ICE
124390
ThE FROuECT SCLUTIONS CC.
S49968.00
INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91
124351
FRC-TECF LAB
S59250900
PUMP PARTS
124392
RMB ENGINEERING/MILLTRONICS
$624.95
INSTRUMENT
124393
STEVE P. RAOOS• INC.
S4619686.50
CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A-2
124394
RAINBCW EISPCSAL CC
S19430.09
TRASH REMOVAL
124395
RECYC INC
S599896957
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-13-91
124396
PED1 EMPRESS
S40.95
MESSENGER SERVICES
124397
RA REED ELECTRIC
S1v282.97
ELECTRICAL_REPAIRS
124398
THF. REGISTER
$895635
NOTICES & ADS
124399
MCJUNKIN-PEPUBLIC SUPPLY
$79059.79
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
1244CO
RCSEPCUAT ANALYTICAL
S846.78
INSTRUMENT PARTS
124461
ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC
S29U35.67
INSTRUMENT PARTS
124402
PEGGY RUPP
S540.00
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
124403
RYAN-HERCC
S139589.60
PUMPS
124404
SAFETY-KLEEN CCRP
S29928.54
PARTS CLEANER
1244CB
SAND DCLLAR PLSINESS FCRMS
$728.06
PRINTING
124406
SANTA ANA ELECTPIC MOTORS
S265.46
ELECTRIC PARTS
124407
SANTA FE IWDUSTRIAL PLASTICS
$49993.54
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
124408
SCHEPING-FLOUG14
$48.00
SAFETY SUPPLIES
124409
SCNWING AMERICA
$19257.29
ELECTRIC PARTS
124410
SCIENCE lFPLICA7IOkS IK79L
S289063.64
OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-12-91
124411
SEA COAST DESICNS
S19348.24
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
124412
SMIMPO AMERICA CORP
$95.39
METER
124413
SHURELUCK SALES
S11r075.75
HARDWARE
124414
SIGMA CHEMICAL CO
S37.64
LAB SUPPLIES
124415
SILVEKI S LE BCUEF
$1449561.60
CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3
124416
SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI
S19411.50
PRE -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
124417
SMITH-F.MEPY CC
3794.00
SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91
124418
SCUT- CCPST WATER
S95.00
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
124419
SCUTI-ERN CALIF EDISON CC
S2159652.14
POWER
124420
SO CAL GAS CO
$99322.29
NATURAL GAS
124421
SCUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO
S189404067
DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL
124422
SCUVENIR FPOTC
$91.87
FILM PROCESSING
C C C
m
X
•-r
l7d
0-1
d
4,
FUNb-..0 9199
- JT GIST YCRKING CAPITAL
PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 FAGE 6
REPOR7 NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS OF ORANGE
COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08/26/92 POSTING DATE
08/26/92
WARRANT NO.
VENCOR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
124423
SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER
329615.62
COOLER RENTALS/DRINKING WATER
124424
WESTALLCY INC
S19917088
WELDING SUPPLIES
124425
SPECIALIZEC PROCLC7S CC
$487.31
ELECTRIC PARTS
124426
SPEX INDUSTRIES INC
$19474.37
LAB SUPPLIES
124427
SRECO FLEXIBLE
$130.28
TRUCK PARTS
124428
SUPELCO INC
S19173.54
LAB SUPPLIES
124429
SLFER Cl- EF CCRF
$379.87
CHEMICALS
124430
TAYLCP-CUNN FFG COMPANY
1879281.24
ELECTRIC CART PARTS
124431
DR GEORGE TCHOBANOGLOUS
$972.00
ENGINEERING SERVICES
124432
TEKDRAULICS
S219056.51
MECHANICAL PARTS
124433
37 EOUIPPEN7 CCMPANY
S235.05
FITTINGS
1244.14
TONY►S LCCK 6 SAFE SERVICE'
S495.48
SECURITY SERVICES
124435
TRAVEL TRAVEL
$724.00
TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-10-92
124436
TRUC$ A AUTC SUPPLY INC
S819.75
TRUCK PARTS
1244!7
JG TUCKER S SCk INC
S29918.95
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
124438
ULTRA SCIENTIFIC
$838.00
LAB SUPPLIES
124439
UNOCAL
$76.00
UNLEADED GASOLINE
124440
UNITEC CCRCRETE COMPANIES
S945.54
CONCRETE
124441
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
$340.64
PARCEL SERVICES
124442
UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP
$238.50
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
124443
VWR SCIENTIFIC
$39086.75
LAB SUPPLIES
124444
VALLEY C17IES SUPPLY CO
$19747.92
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
124445
VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL
S19410.59
ENGINE PARTS
124446
VAf11EP BUSINESS FORMS
$597008
OFFICE SUPPLIES
124447
VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS
S49517.42
LAB SUPPLIES
124448
VERTEX SYSTEMS
S812.50
COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
124449
VILLAEE NLRSERIES
S864.38
LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
124450
WATER ENVIRCNMENT FED.
S197.45
PUBLICATION
124451
WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY
S509924.32
CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-8-90
1244E2
WESTINGHCLSE ELECTRIC COPP
S319.80
ELECTRIC PARTS
1244E_3
LILLCAN ISSCCIATES
S3.397.61
ENGINEERING SERVICES
124454
W17EG SCIENTIFIC
$468.72
LAB SUPPLIES
124455
XEROX CORP
S29052.46
COPIER LEASES
1244E6
GEORGE YARDLEY CC
S700.83
LAB SUPPLIES
124457
71ERART►• ANC ALPER
S62.194.33
CONSTRUCTION P1-34-1
124458
RICHARD E ECGAR
-----------------
$200.00
DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 08/26/92
-----------------
$49638053.95
m
x
2
,- 4
bd
r
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/21/92 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 08/26/92 POSTING DATE 08/26/92
SUMMARY
#1 CAP PAC FUND
#2 OPER FUND
#2 CAP FAC FUND
#3 OPER FUND
#3 CAP FAC FUND
#5 OPER FUND
#5 CAP FAC FUND
#6 OPER FUND
#7 OPER FUND
#7 CAP FAC FUND
#12 OPER FUND
#14 CAP FAC FUND
#5&6 OPER FUND
#7&14 OPER FUND
JT OPER FUND
CORF
SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND
0
AMOUNT
$46,763.65
$6,381.83
$171,723.28
$27,292.05
$596.28
$4,635.88
$160,624.00
$26.69
$4,275.75
$10,708.45
$677.18
$430,455.85
$3,838.74
$5,430.74
$826,685.01
$2,679,507.83
$101,023.30
$157,907.44
$4,638,553.95
C
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2,
I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting
on 199A was duly posted for public inspection
at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on ,
19AL.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this
day .of 19,9a,.
00,
Penny Kyle, i nt ecretary of
each of the BoarV of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of
Orange County, California
F27A.1