HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-07-12..
II
FlLED .
In the Office of the S~cre v.7 ~
County Sanitat~n District(. ~ // ) County Sanitation Districts No(s)./~ ;;; % .)> 14,. i .Lt,, 7 of Orange County, California
JUL 2 61995 P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
/J Y Telephone: (714) 962-2411
By C/M DRAFT
MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
Wednesday, July 12. 1995. 5:30 P.M.
A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California was held on July 12, 1995 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Offices.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Committee Directors Present:
John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chairman
George Brown, Chairman
Burnie Dunlap
James Flora
John M. Gullixson
Wally Linn
Thomas Saltarelli
Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chairman
William G. Steiner
Peer Swan
Committee Directors Absent:
Jan Debay
Staff Present:
Don Mcintyre, General Manager
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance
Bob Ooten, Director of Operations
Mike White, Controller
Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
Others Present
Tom Woodruff, General Counsel
Rich Brown, Orange County Employees Assn.
(2) APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIRMAN PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were made.
(4) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER. ASSISTANT
GENERAL MANAGER($}, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER.
DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) Report of the Committee Chair
George Brown, Chairman, had no report.
Minutes of Finance, Adrr: ·-~nd Human Resources Committer ·1 Page2
July 12, 1995
(b) Report of the General Manager
General Manager Don Mcintyre reported on the status of pending
recruitments for Laboratory Manager, Director of Engineering and
Assistant General Manager for Administration. He requested that the
proposed salary level of the Assistant General Manager be added to the
agenda in order to have a Committee recommendation to the Boards.
The Committee voted to add an emergency agenda item.
(c) Report of Assistant General Manager
Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson updated the Committee on
recent events regarding the County bankruptcy, including the OCIP Pool
Committee meeting of earlier in the day. He reported on the interest
allocation expected next week, the litigation strategy against Merrill Lynch
et. al, the hearing before Judge Ryan scheduled for July 14, 1995, the
reasons the OCIP Pool Committee opposed the "roll-over" agreement,
pending bankruptcy related items in Sacramento and continuing
discussions regarding the landfills.
(d) Report of the Finance Director/Treasurer
Finance DirectorfTreasurer Gary Streed reviewed the reports included
with the agenda package updating the Committee on the status of the
Districts' cash and investments. He further advised the Committee that
the Districts' agreements with Pacific Investment Management Company,
"PIMCo,· to serve as Investment Manager, and Mellon Trust Company, to
serve as Custodial Bank are being finalized, and that funds are expected
to be transferred before month-end. Mr. Streed also reviewed the
remarketing activities for the Series "A," Series "C," and Series "1993
Refunding" COPs, and the interest rate history for the past month.
(e) Report of the Director of Human Resources
Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources, reported that the Orange
· County District Attorney had recently notified the Districts that the case
had been closed regarding any criminal negligence in the February 1994
fire at Plant 2 and that no negligence had been found.
(f) Report of General Counsel
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, reviewed a report contained in the
agenda package and requested that the Committee approve an
adjustment in the fee schedule of his firm's Professional Services
Agreement with the Districts. The Committee recommendation is reported
as FAHR95-34 below.
,, . , Minutes of Finance, Ar' . and Human Resources Committ-
Page 3 1
July 12, 1995
(5) FINAL DRAFT REPORT OF THE ERNST & YOUNG FINANCE FUNCTIONAL
REVIEW OF PURCHASING AND WAREHOUSING. ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCE. AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS.
This report will be presented to the Executive Committee at their meeting of.
July 19, 1995. There was no discussion regarding this item at the meeting.
(6) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the draft minutes of the
June 14, 1995, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee.
(7) OLD BUSINESS
FAHR95-25 Classification. Compensation. and Other Terms. Conditions,
Rules and Regulations of Employment
Gary Hasenstab, Director of Human Resources, reviewed the Employee Benefit
Program Summary. The Committee had requested an expanded summary which
included examples and amounts. It was moved, seconded and duly carried to
) receive and file this report which is intended to be filed with the original report.
(8) NEW BUSINESS
FAHR95-31 Consideration of Motion to Adopt Investment Performance
Review Guidelines for the Districts' Investment Program
After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend that the Executive Committee approve the following actions:
1. Adopt the investment performance benchmarks for the Liquid Operating
Monies fund, the 3-month T-Bill rate and the Callan Active Cash Fixed-Income
Style Group; and the Long-Term Operating Fund, the Merrill Lynch
Government and Corporate 1 to 5-year Maturity Index and the Callan
Defensive Fixed-Income Style Group, as recommended by staff.
2. Adopt the contents and frequency of routine investment performance reports
to be reviewed by the Committee each month or quarter as recommended by
staff.
Minutes of Finance, Adrr·---and Human Resources Committ~~
Page4
July 12, 1995
FAHR95-32 Consideration of Proposed Changes to the IRS-Approved
Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan as follows:
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-Approving First
Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers
and Emplovees in Order to Permit Greater Flexibility in
Plan Distribution Elections. Clarify Certain Provisions of
the Plan. and Comply with Certain Recent Internal Revenue
Service Interpretations.
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-Approving
Amended Deferred Compensation Program for
Management. Professional and Supervisorv Employees.
After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend that the Executive Committee approve (a) the First Amendment to the
CSDOC Deferred Compensation Plan which clarifies the Plan and incorporates
I.RS. changes at no cost to the Districts, and; (b) modifications to the Management,
Professional and Supervisory Employees Deferred Compensation Program only to
add those positions to the program that were approved as a part of the resolution of
the former Confidential Unit last month.
FAHR95-33 Consideration of Orange County Employees Association
<OCEA) Grievance Concerning Side Letter Agreement
After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend that the grievance be denied on the basis that no group of employees
did in fact receive a general increase in salary during the period of November 26,
1993, through November 23, 1996, higher than the negotiated increase received by
the OCEA unit.
FAHR95-34 Consideration of Amendment No.13 re Agreement for
Employment of General Counsel
The Committee reported their high regard for the services rendered by Rourke,
Woodruff & Spradlin over the past several years. After discussion of alternative
methods to obtain legal services including the current privatizing, developing an in-
house team and a mix of the two, the Committee recommended approval of
Amendment No. 13 re Agreement for Employment of General Counsel, including an
increase in hourly rates for Mr. Woodruff, Principals and Senior Associate,
Associates and Paralegals; and future annual increases based upon the changes in
an index.
The Committee also directed staff and General Counsel to return to a future
meeting with a report regarding alternative methods to obtain legal services.
Minutes of Finance, Ar .. 1. and Human Resources Cammi~, ~
Page 5 )
July 12, 1995
(9) CLOSED SESSION
There was no closed session required.
(10) OTHER BUSINESS. IF ANY
None.
(11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
The Committee requested two items be considered at future meetings:
A) A review of alternative methods of obtaining legal services,
B) A review of total compensation for exempt employees.
(12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE
AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
None.
(13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE
DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS
The Committee will not meet in August, November and December 1995, as no
Executive Committee meetings are scheduled, and no FAHR Committee
recommendation could be carried to the respective Joint Board meetings.
The next Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, September 13, 1995.
(15) ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
/gs
J:\WPDOC\FIN\CRANE\FPCMTG\FPC95'MNllTESIMFAHR7A.95
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the
Notice and the Agenda for the Finance, Administration and Human Resources meeting held
on July 12, 1995, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts'
offices on July 6, 1995.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of July, 1995.
Penny Kyle, Secreta eac
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
County, California
the Boards of Directors of County
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange
Posted: ~ 6 , , 1995, tf: / D P.M. I By:~~~
J:\WPDOC\FINICRANEIFPC.MTGIFPC95\CERTOF.POS\CERTPOS7.95
11
July 6, 1995
/~ ,,..---\
I ) ', j
COUNTY SANIT A Tl ON D ISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
(714) 962-2411
NOTICE OF MEETING
FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
WEDNESDAY. JULY 12. 1995 -5:30 P.M.
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
A regular meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of
the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above location, time and date.
J:IWPOOC\FIN\CRANE\FPC.MTGIFPC95\NOTICEINOTICE7.95
June 8, 1995
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 927
1714) 962-2411
FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED
MEETING DATES
Finance,
Administration and Action Items to
Human Resources Executive Committee Action Items to Joint
Committee Meetings Meeting Board Meeting
July July 12, 1995 July 19, 1995 July 26, 1995
August None Scheduled None Scheduled August23, 1995
September September 13, 1995 September 20, 1995 September 27, 1995
October October 11, 1995 October 18, 1995 October 25, 1995
November None Scheduled None Scheduled November 22, 1995
December None Scheduled None Scheduled December 27, 1995
January January 10, 1996 January 17, 1996 January 24, 1996
February February 14, 1996 February 21, 1996 February 28, 1996
March March 13, 1996 March 20, 1996 March 27, 1996
April April 10, 1996 April 17, 1996 April 24, 1996
May May 8, 1996 May 15, 1996 May 22, 1996
June June 12, 1996 June 19, 1995 June 26, 1996
July July 10, 1996 July17, 1996 July 24, 1996
J:IWPOOCIFINICRANEIFPC.MTG\FPC95\NOTICE\NOllCE7.95
FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
MEETING
DATE 7 -12-95
COMMITTEE MEMBERS
GEORGE BROWN (Chair) •••••••••••••••••••••.
ROGER R. STANTON (Vice Chair) •••••••••••••••
JAN DEBAY ................................. .
BURNIE DUNLAP ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
JAMES H. FLORA ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
JOHN M. GULLIXSON .••••••.••••••••••••••••••
WALLY LINN •••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••
THOMAS SALTARELLI ••••••••••.•••.••••••••••
WILLIAM G. STEINER ••••.•.•••••••••••.••••.•.
PEER A. SWAN (VJC) ••.••••••••.•.••••••••••••
JOHN C. COX, JR. (JC) ...•••••••••••••••••••.•
OTHER DIRECTORS
--------······················
--------······················
STAFF
PRESENT
DON MCINTYRE, GENERAL MANAGER .••••.••••••••••••••....
BLAKE ANDERSON, ASST. GENERAL MANAGER ..••••••.••••••
GARY STREED, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE •••••••••.••••••••••••
GARY HASENSTAB, DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL ••••.•..•••••••
ED HODGES, DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE •••...••.••.•••••••
BOB OOTEN, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS ..••••••••.•••...•.•
JOHN UNDER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING ••••••••.••••.•••.
ED TORRES, DIRECTOR OF TECH. SERVICES •••••.•••••••••••
STEVE KOZAK, FINANCIAL MANAGER •••.••••.•.•••.•...•••••
MIKE WHITE, CONTROLLER .•••••••••••..•••••••.•••••.••••.
OTHERS
TOM WOODRUFF, GEN'L. COUNSEL ••••••••.•.••••••••.•••••. -------................................. ,., .. .
ROLL1.95
TIME 5:30 P .M.
ADJOURN ___ _
ABSENT
PRESENT
July 12, 1995
AGENDA
FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTE-E
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY. JULY 12. 199'5 -5:30 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this
agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts' Administrative Offices not less than 72
hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are
available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the
Committee for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b} as an
emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of
the Committee subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda
posted in the manner as above, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date .
.. ·······~··········-· .... _ .............................. " .............................. ····-··· ···-· ............................................................. ,.--............ _ ... ._ .... .-. ._ ..... , ....... _ .... _. ___ ,. ___ .......... '"""-·---·-···-· ··-·--·····-
( 1 ) Roll Call
(2) Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary.
(3) PubOe Comments: All persons wishing to address the Committee on specific
agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As
determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is
taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this
agenda cannot have action taken by the Committee except as authorized by
Section 54954.2(b ).
July 12, 1995
(4) The Committee Chairman, General Manager, Assistant General Manager(s),
Director of FinanceITreasurer, Director of Human Resources and General
Counsel may present verbal and/or written reports on miscellaneous matters of
general interest to the Committee Members. These reports are for information
only and require no action by the Committee Members.
(a) Report of Committee Chairman
(b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of Assistant General Manager(s)
(d) Report of Director of FinanceITreasurer
( e) Report of Director of Human Resources
(f) Report of General Counsel
(5) Final Draft of the Ernst & Young Finance Function Review of Purchasing and
Warehousing, Accounting and Finance, and Information Systems for
Committee's information.
(6) Approval of draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee
Minutes for Meeting of June 14, 1995.
(7) Old Business.
EAHR95-25
(8) New Business.
FAHR95-31
FAHR95-32
Classification, Compensation, and Other Terms,
Conditions, Rules and Regulations of Employment
Consideration of Motion to Adopt Investment
Performance Review Guidelines for the Districts'
Investment Program
Consideration of Proposed Changes to the IRS-
Approved Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan as
follows:
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_ Approving
Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan for
Officers and Employees in Order to Permit
Greater Flexibility in Plan Distribution Elections,
Clarify Certain Provisions of the Plan, and Comply
with Certain Recent Internal Revenue Service
Interpretations.
-2-
/~
I
'\ July 12, 1995 ,
(Cont'd)
FAHR95-32
FAHR95~33
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_ Approving
Amended Deferred Compensation Program for
General Manager, Assistant Generar Manager and
Department Heads and Resolution No. 95-_
Approving Amended Deferred Compensation
Program for Assistant Department Heads,
Professional and Supervisory Employees, and
Executive Assistants, Both in Order to Include
Modifications to the Vesting Periods for Districts'
Contributions.
Consideration of Orange County Employees Association
(OCEA) Grievance Concerning Side Letter Agreement
(9) Closed Session .
....................... ,. ..... , .... _ ....... _ .................... _. ................... -._·~-·············"'···················-........................................... _. ___ ..... --....... -............. .
Closed Session: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this
agenda as a regular meeting of the Committee, the Chairman may convene the Committee in
closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters,
: pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6.
!
•
::::::::::!::· Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or
which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be
reliiewed by the Committee during a permitted closed session and are not available for public
inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Committee on any of these subjects,
the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information.
! ..... .._ •• __________ _. •. _ .... _., ....•.• -.......... :.. ............................... _ .......................... ,. ... _. ______ ......................... -...................................... _ ...................... _ ..• _ ..... i" .......... !
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
(b) Reconvene in regular session.
(c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session.
( d Report on discussion taken in closed session, as required.
(10) Other business, if any.
(11) Matters which a Diredor would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting.
(12) Matters which a Diredor may wish to place on a future agenda for action and a
staff report.
(13) Consideration of upcoming meeting dates and items to be discussed at those
meetings.
-3-
July 12, 1995
(14) Adjourn.
r····-·-···--·-··-·················-···················-·····························--··-··;..··-····-···········-.. -·······························-·1
; ::::::.
Notice to Committee Members:
If you have any questions regarding the Agenda, or wish to place items on the Finance,
Administration and Human Resources Agenda, Committee members should contact the
Committee Chair or Secretary ten days in advance of the Committee meeting.
Committee Chair:
Secretary:
George Brown
Lenora Crane
(310) 431-2185
(714) 962-2411, Ext. 2501
(714) 962-3954 (FAX) ....................................... -·-··-······-··-·····-·········-···············----·-·-········--····-········-···········-·--·········-·-··--·········-··········
J:\WPDOC\FINICRANEIFPC.MTGV'PCll5\AGENDA.FPC\AGENDA7.115
-4-
(4)(d)
Summary
FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN
RESOURCES COMMITTEE
AGENDA FOR
JULY 12, 1995
Treasurer's Report
During June, the Committee and the Board selected Pacific Investment Management
Company, "PIMCO," to serve as the Districts' Investment Manager, and Mellon Trust
Company to serve as Custodial Bank. As of month-end, these agreements were being
finalized in preparation for a transfer of funds and function in July.
The 3% "Good as Gold" notes were funded on June 19, 1995, and $20,086,771.47 was
deposited. Interest earnings from the OCIP for the period from December 7, 1994
through May 19, 1994, are still being resolved by the County, Arthur Anderson, and
Price Waterhouse. The Pool Committee has demanded the undisputed amounts, but
no funds have been released.
Balances Estimated
CS DOC June 30, 1995 Yield
State of Calif. LAIF $ 24,896,672 6.01%
Bank of America 265,566 4.50%
U.S. Treasury Bills Due 712.0 306,382,859 5.09%
Debt Service Reserves at Trustees 20,565,652 6.41%
$352,110,749 5.23%
Garden Grove San District 1,072,063 6.01%
Orange Co. Investment Pool 163,747 5.92%
$3531346.559 5.23% --
J:IWPOOCV'1NICRANEIFPC.MTGIFPC95\ITEMS.AGCMGOITM4.795
.•
TOTAL CASH & INVESTMENT
Dec6 Dec31 Jan31 Feb28 Mar31 Apr30 May31 June30
Staff Recommendation
Information only item.
-2-
J:IWPDOC\FIN\CRANE\FPC.MTGIFPC95VTEMS.AGD\AGDITM4.7ll5
<'I
FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN
RESOURCES COMMITTEE
(4)(d)
Summarv:
AGENDA FOR
JULY 12, 1995
Director of Finance Report
During the month of June, the daily rate program remarketing agents were changed
from Merrill Lynch to PaineWebber for the Series A and the 1993 Refunding COPs and
to J.P. Morgan for the Series C COPs. (Series B COPs have been refunded and the
1992 Refunding COPs are remarketed by Paine Webber in a weekly mode.)
The attached graphs show the interest rates on each of the daily rate COPs for the past
month. A separate graph was prepared for each because of the different remarketing
agent change dates, which are noted on each graph. In future months, the information
will be presented on one graph.
Staff will maintain its continuous rate monitoring and ongoing dialog with the
remarketing agents to keep the Committee fully informed about developments in the
program as they occur and at each meeting.
Staff Recommendation
Information only.
J:IWPOOC\FINICRANEIFPC.MTGIFPC95\AGENDA.FPCIDOF.795
CSDOC DAILY COP RATES, SERIES "A"
5.00
4.50 -------·------------------------------------------------------------~-----------------------
-"#. -w ~ a:
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
30-
May-
95
05/0719502:41 PM
PaineWebber begins remarketing.
31-
May-
95
05-
Jun-
95
07-
Jun-
95
12-
Jun-
95
14-
Jun-
95
DATE
19-
Jun-
95
21-
Jun-
95
26-
Jun-
95
28-
Jun-
95
03-
Jul-
95
05-
Jul-
95
J
)
5.00
4.50
4.00
3.50
3.00 -'#. -w I-2.50
<( a:
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
-
CSDOC DAILY COP RATES, SERIES "C"
·-------· -.... ... \ ____ :~~-~------------------------------=;•~~~~---------------:/~~-----------~\----------~----\ --.. ________ ,,,.
' ; ' ' ; ----------·~--------------------11----------------------------------------------~,------------
' I 111111...._ \
I "" I I \
' I \ ---------------,-----~--------~~----------------------------------------------~---~---------·
I
I
I ' ------------------'-....--------,.! _ ---------
' I ---------------------------------------------~' ----.
' I ', I
' \ I ------------------------·---------------
30-31 -05-07-12-
May-May-Jun-Jun-Jun-
95 95 95 95 95
' ' ' ' ' --------------------------------------------------'•
J. P. Morgan begins remarketing.
14-19-21-26-28-03-05-
Jun-Jun-Jun-Jun-Jun-Jul-Jul-
95 95 95 95 95 95 95
DATE
05/07/9502:50 PM
•
J
CSDOC DAILY COP RATES, SERIES "1993 REF"
5.00
4.50 -------------------------------' ----------------~ ------: --------------------
-'#. -w I-c:t a:
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
30-
May-
95
05/07 /9503:03 PM
31-
May-
95
05-
Jun-
95
07-
Jun-
95
12-
Jun-
95
14-
Jun-
95
PaineWebber begins remarketing.
DATE
19-
Jun-
95
21-
Jun-
95
26-
Jun-
95
28-
Jun-
95
03-
Jul-
95
05-
Jul-
95
(4)(f)
Summary
FINANCE, ADMrNISTRATION AND HUMAN
RESOURCES COMMITTEE
AGENDA FOR
JULY 12, 1995
General Counsel's Report
The attached report was received from General Counsel. Tom Woodruff will review
the report for the Committee's consideration at the meeting.
) Staff Recommendation
\ _ _)
N/A
J:\WPOOC\FIN\CRANE\FPC.MTG\FPC95\ITEMS.AGDICOUNSEL.795
LAW OFFICE S O F'
ROURKE. WOODRUFF & SPRADLIN
A PROFESSIONAL C O RPORATION
TO:
-FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMORANDU M
Joint Chairman and Members of Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
General Counsel
July 3, 1995
Professional Services Agreement
Fee Schedule Adjustment
Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin is requesting your approval of an adjustment in the fee
schedule of our Professional Services Agreement. Our rates have not been adjusted for
more than three years, as we have withheld any request for adjustments during this period
in response to the uncertainty of finances for the Districts' operations. During the same
period of time, we have experienced substantial increases in the costs we incur in providing
our legal services for the Districts.
Our Firm is proud of the legal services we have provided to the Districts. We believe
we provide the highest quality legal services while, at the same time, constantly strive to
efficiently control the costs to the Districts. Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin is unique in its
policy of not passing through charges for overhead expenses, such as mileage, overtime,
telephone, faxes and routine photocopying, which are commonly-accepted billing practices
in the legal industry.
Our proposed rates, which we believe are appropriate and reasonable, are set forth
below. The premium for Mr. Woodruff's time represents his being recognized, both
nationally and statewide, as an expert in wastewater law. The proposed rates represent
an increase of less than 4% per year total, which is less than the change in the cost of
living for the same period of time.
Thomas L. Woodruff
Principals and Senior Associates
Associates
Paralegals
Present Rate
$160.00
$160.00
$135.00
$ 70.00
Proposed Rate
$185.00
$175.00
$150.00
$ 80.00
Joint Chairman and Members of Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
July 3, 1995
Page 2
In recognition of comments and suggestions by some Board Members that service
agreements be adjusted regularly, but nominally, rather than large increases after a longer
time period, we have added a new provision to the Agreement to allow for the rates to be
adjusted annually in an amount equal to the Consumer Price Index for all wage earners in
the Los Angeles-Orange County metropolitan area.
We would again reaffirm to the Boards our pleasure and satisfaction in being able
to provide services to you and to the Staff and other Consultants of the Districts. It is very
rewarding to work with committed individuals in every regard, who constantly exercise their
skills in producing the highest quality of work product.
TLW:pj
~c!rA~.
THOMASL.WOODRUFF
GENERAL COUNSEL
AMENDMENT NO. 13 RE AGREEMENT FOR
EMPLOYMENT OF GENERAL COUNSEL
THIS AMENDMENT to that certain Agreement dated May 1, 1975, is made and
entered into this __ day of _______ , 1995, by and between THOMAS L.
WOODRUFF, hereinafter referred to as "COUNSEL", who is an owner/member of the
Law Firm of Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin, a Professional Corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "FIRM"; and COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, on behalf of itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, hereinafter referred to as
"DISTRICT'.
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have previously entered into an Agreement,
whereby DISTRICT employed COUNSEL to serve in the capacity as General Legal
Counsel to DISTRICT; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend said Agreement, as more
particularly set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, it is agreed between the
parties hereto as follows:
1. Paragraph 4 of said Agreement is hereby amended to read:
"4. Compensation for legal services by COUNSEL shall be as follows:
(a) There shall be no minimum retainer paid to COUNSEL.
(b) For all work attendant to those services set forth in
Paragraph 3 above, DISTRICT shall pay FIRM at a rate of One Hundred
1
Eighty-Five ($185.00) Dollars per hour. For legal services rendered by
other Principals or Senior Associates of FIRM, DISTRICT shall pay to
FIRM at a rate of One Hundred Seventy-Five ($175.00) Dollars per hour.
For those services rendered by Associate Attorneys of COUNSEL, who
are members of COUNSEL'S FIRM, DISTRICT shall pay to FIRM at a rate
of One Hundred Fifty ($150.00) Dollars per hour. For those services
rendered by Paralegals of COUNSEL, who are employees of COUNSEL'S
FIRM, DISTRICT shall pay to FIRM at a rate of Eighty ($80.00) Dollars per
hour.
(c) Effective July 1 of each year, the hourly labor rates shall be
adjusted in an amount equal to the percentage increase in the Consumer
Price Index for the Los Angeles-Orange County Metropolitan Area, all
wage earners, for the period between June 1 through May 30 of the prior
year. Each hourly labor rate shall be rounded to the nearest $1.00
increment. All of the rates listed shall include FIRM'S direct labor costs,
indirect costs, overhead and profit.
(d) For appearances by COUNSEL at conferences, symposiums
or seminars on behalf of DISTRICT, DISTRICT shall pay FIRM at the rate
of Four Hundred ($400.00) Dollars per day, or at the rate of One Hundred
Eighty-Five ($185.00) Dollars per hour, whichever is less.
(e) DISTRICT shall be responsible for and shall pay or
reimburse FIRM for all costs and expenditures required or advanced by
2000-00028
15253_1 2
COUNSEL or FIRM in the preparation for, prosecution or defense of
litigation, including court costs, jury fees, witness fees, reporter's fees, title
reports, photographs, diagrams, maps and similarly-related items.
(f) DISTRICT shall be responsible for and shall pay or
reimburse COUNSEL or FIRM for the actual expenses of travel, food and
lodging outside the County of Orange on the business of DISTRICT, and
shall pay or reimburse COUNSEL or FIRM for all other necessary
expenditures on the business of DISTRICT in the actual amounts so
expended."
2. This Amendment shall take effect August 1, 1995.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
executed on the day and year first above written.
TLW:pj
2000-00028
15253_1
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, on behalf of itself and as agent for
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
of Orange County, California
Chairman, Board of Directors
Secretary, Board of Directors
ROURKE, WOODRUFF & SPRADLIN, P.C.
By __________________________________ ~
Thomas L. Woodruff
3
~ I
FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN
RESOURCES COMMITTEE
AGENDA FOR
JULY 12, 1995
(5) Final Draft of the Ernst & Young Finance Function Review of
Purchasing and Warehousing, Accounting and Finance, and
Information Systems
Summary:
The final draft of the Ernst & Young Finance Function Review of Purchasing and
Warehousing, Accounting and Finance, and Information Systems is scheduled to be
presented to the Executive Committee on July 19, 1995.
Copies of the report will be available at the Finance, Administration and Human
Resources Committee meeting for any Directors who would like a copy.
Staff Recommendation
Information only.
J:\WPOOC\FINICRANE\FPC.MTGIFPC85\ITEMS.AGDIFAHR5.795
~\
I
FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION A.ND HUMAN
RESOURCES COMMITTEE
AGENDA FOR
JULY 12, 1995
( 6} Consideration of Motion to Approve the Draft Finance,
Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Minutes of
June 14, 1995
Summary
Attached is a draft of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee
meeting Minutes of June 14, 1995, for approval by the Committee.
Staff Recommendation
It is recommended that the minutes of the June 14, 1995, Finance, Administration and
Human Resources Committee meeting be approved. These minutes were submitted to
the Executive Committee at their June 21, 1995 meeting, and no further action is
required.
J:IWPDOCIFINICRANEIFPC.MTGIFPC95\llEMS.AGOIMFPC7.95
n
DRAFT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
Wednesdav. June 14. 1995. 5:30 P.M.
A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California was held on June 14, 1995 at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative
offices.
(1) ROLL CALL
The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows:
Committee Directors Present:
John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chairman
George Brown, Chairman
Jan Debay
Burnie Dunlap
John M. Gullixson
Wally Linn
Thomas Saltarelli
Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chairman
William G. Steiner
Peer Swan
Committee Directors Absent:
James H. Flora
Staff Present:
Don Mcintyre, General Manager
Blake Anderson, Assistant General Manager
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Ed Hodges, Director of Maintenance
Bob Ooten, Director of Operations
Ed Torres, Director of Technical Services
John Linder, Director of Engineering
Mike White, Controller
Steve Kozak, Financial Manager
Others Present
Tom Woodruff, General Counsel
(2) APPOINTMENT OF A CHAIRMAN PRO TEM
No appointment was necessary.
(3) PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments were made.
(4) REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR. GENERAL MANAGER. ASSISTANT
GENERAL MANAGER(Sl. DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER.
DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND GENERAL COUNSEL
(a) Report of the Committee Chair
George Brown, Chairman, reported that a change to current remarketing
Minutes of Finance, Adr ~~and Human Resources Committr --'\
Page 2 ) · 1
June 14, 1995
agreements was requested by one of the parties to the previously
authorized reassignments. A vote was taken to add consideration of this
change to the agenda, and to take action as a part of the Report of
General Counsel.
(b) Report of the General Manager
General Manager Don Mcintyre, reminded the Committee of the Directors'
orientation and tour to be conducted Saturday, June 17, 1995.
(c) Report of Assistant General Manager(s)
Assistant General Manager Blake Anderson updated the Committee on
recent events regarding the resolution of the County bankruptcy and the
potential impact on the Districts and a quick settlement.
(d) Report of the Finance DirectorlTreasurer
Finance DirectorfTreasurer Gary G. Streed reviewed the report included
with the agenda package and updated the Committee on the status of the
Orange County Investment Pool and the Districts' self-managed bank and
investment accounts. The December 6, 1994 reserves receivable from
the County will be reported as a long-term receivable and not as an
investment in the future.
(e) Report of the Director of Human Resources
None.
(f) Report of General Counsel
Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, gave a status report on previous
action taken by the FAHR Committee and Joint Boards relative to
changing the Remarketing Agents on all three of our current outstanding
financing programs. He advised that the Series A and C have been fully
completed, with all documents executed. The Agreements and documents
relating to 1993 Series Refunding are complete and approved by all
parties, however Societe Generale would like clarification on a provision
relating to obligation to pay the 1993 Series Refunding Remarketing
Agreement.
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to accept the requested
amendment of Societe Generale to the 1993 Series Refunding
Remarketing Agreement that provides that if the Certificates are converted
to a fixed mode "at the direction of the Bank, the Bank will pay the
reasonable fee."
I I
I
Minutes of Finance, f-~. and Human Resources Com~
Page 3 · · ;
June 14, 1995
(5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the draft minutes of the
May 10, 1995, meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee.
(6) Consideration of motion recommending approval of the proposed 1995-96
Joint Works Budgets and forwarding them to the Executive Committee as
follows:
Joint Works Operating/Working Capital
Workers' Compensation Self-Insurance
Public Liability Self-Insurance
Dental Health Plan Trust Self-Insurance
Joint Works Capital Outlav Revolving
$54.380,00'0
307,000
272.000
437.000
33,530,000
After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend that the Executive Committee approve the proposed Joint Works
Operating, Joint Works Capital and Self-Insurance Fund Budgets for 1995-96.
(7) Consideration of Planning. Design and Construction Committee
recommendation PDCC6Udl: and Operations. Maintenance and Technical
Services Committee recommendation OMTS95-027 Re:
Consideration of Motion to Authorize the General Manager to
Approve Expenditure of Funds up to $50,000 for Contracts. Services
and Purchase Orders. Excluding Public Works Contracts Governed
by State Law and Professional Services Agreements Governed by
Board Resolution 95-9
After discussion on this item, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend that the Executive Committee recommend the Boards of Directors:
Authorize the General Manager to approve expenditures of funds up to $50,000
for contracts, services and purchase orders, excluding public works contracts
governed by State law; and professional services agreement governed by Board
Resolution 95-9.
(8) OLD BUSINESS
FAHR95-25 Classification. Compensation. and Other Terms. Conditions,
Rules and Regulations of Employment
After discussion on this matter, staff was directed to return this item, including
examples and amounts, for future consideration.
Minutes of Finance, Act -""'-
1
and Human Resources CommitV --'-,
Page 4 · ,
June 14, 1995
FAHR95-26 Consideration of Motion for Renewal of All-Risk Insurance
(including Fire. Flood and Earthquake Coverage) for FY
1995-96
After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend the Executive Committee approve renewal of the Districts' All-Risk
insurance program including earthquake, flood, personal property and business
interruption, in the amounts of $200 million All-Risk, and $30 million earthquake with
deductibles of $25,000 for all perils except earthquake and 5% per unit ($250,000
min.) for earthquake, for a total premium not to exceed $1.4 million.
FAHR95-29 Consideration of Motions to Select External Money Manager
and Custodial Services Bank for the Districts' Investment
Program
After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend the Executive Committee:
1. Select the firm of Pacific Management Investment Company to serve as the
Districts' external money manager, and authorize staff to negotiate a
professional services agreement.
2. Select Mellon Trust Company as master custodial services bank, and
authorize staff to 'negotiate a professional services agreement.
(9) NEW BUSINESS
FAHR95-30 Consideration of Motion to Make Revisions to MPRP
(Management Perfonnance Review Plan) Perfonnance
Incentive Values
After discussion on this matter, it was moved, seconded and duly carried to
recommend that the Executive Committee approve the following multi-phased
approach, in order to realize the initial objectives of the MPRP program to provide
an incentive for consistent meritorious performance:
1. Effective in July 1995, authorize funds totaling $173,000 beyond the 3.0
percent of payroll Merit Pool Fund approved last year sufficient to address
the more critical range position issues now occurring. Payments will be
made in 1995-96.
2. Establish a Target Merit Pool Fund of 5.0 percent of payroll (totaling
$453,000) for implementation in July 1996 sufficient to incentivize
performance as recommended by Ernst & Young. This fund would be
distributed based on performance (see Attachment 1) as in the past, and
would be in addition to the already authorized 3.0 percent fund which would
Minutes of Finance, f~n. and Human Resources Comm,_..,,
Page 5 1 J ' J
June 14, 1995
be used to provide a cost-of-living adjustment to those employees whose
performance at least met expectations. Payments would be made in
1996-97.
3. Provide extensive training to all supervisors and managers in proper
administration of the program, and particularly the review process as
recommended by Ernst & Young.
(10) CLOSED SESSION
The Chairman reported to the Committee the need for a Closed Session as
authorized by Government Code Section 54957 .6 to discuss and consider the item
that is specified as Item 10 on the published Agenda. The Committee convened in
closed session at 7:45 p.m.
At 8:00 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. It was moved,
seconded and duly carried to approve the recommendations of the Management
Staff contained in the report of June 14, 1995, relating to changes in job titles for
certain confidential employees, the dissolution of the confidential employees
bargaining unit, and the designation of certain job classifications as confidential
employees.
Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Committee have been
prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are
maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of
Board and Committee Closed Meetings.
(11) OTHER BUSINESS. IF ANY
None.
(12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A
SUBSEQUENT MEETING
None.
(13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE
AGENDA FOR ACTION AND A STAFF REPORT
None.
Minutes of Finance, Adr ---·and Human Resources Committf
Page 6 · 1 '
June 14, 1995
(14) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES AND ITEMS TO BE
DISCUSSED AT THOSE MEETINGS
Committee Chairman George Brown requested the Committee refer to the calendar
of future meetings on the back of the Notice of Meeting and reminded the Directors
that the next Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, July 12, 1995. He
recommended the Committee also review the list of future meeting topics.
The Committee will not meet in August, November and December 1995, as no
Executive Committee meetings are scheduled, and no FAHR Committee
recommendation could be carried to the respective Joint Board meetings.
(15) ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
GGS:lc
J:\WPOOC\FIN\CRANE\MTG\FPC951MNUTES'MFAHR6.95
~
I I ~
FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN
RESOURCES COMMITTEE
FAHR95-25:
Summary
AGENDA FOR
JULY 12, 1995
Classification, Compensation, and Other Terms,
Conditions, Rules and Regulations of Employment
At the May meeting, the Committee reviewed and approved an omnibus resolution
containing in one place all of the terms, conditions, rules and regulations of
employment. This was the first time that all of the current information had been
available in one place.
During the discussion, the Committee asked for a matrix that indicated which provisions
were applicable to which employee groups. That matrix has been expanded in
accordance with the Directors' June discussion, and is enclosed for the Directors to add
to their previous packages.
Staff Recommendation
Information only.
J:\WPDOC\FINICRANE\FPC.MTG\FPC95\ITEMS.AGD\FAHR95.258
July 12, 1995
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728·8127
(714) 962·2411
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PROGRAM SUMMARY
The Districts' Employee Benefit Program is designed to provide eligible staff members with
important professional services, time away from work, recognition for continued successful
contribution to the Districts' mission and rewards for special efforts. The benefit program is
an important component of total compensation, and represents a value in excess of one-third
of an employee's salary. All benefit programs are subject to the meet and confer process.
The following summary description of benefits enjoyed by employees is excerpted from
Districts' Policies and appropriate memoranda of understanding, which may be consulted for
a more complete description.
INSURANCE
Medical. Districts' monthly contribution towards each of the medical plans are as follow:
Plan Districts' Contribution Employees' Contribution
NORTHWESTERN
Employee only $338.62 $ -0-
Employee & 1 dependent $477.92 $ 90.00
Full Family $653.96 $160.00
FHP
Employee only $134.65 $ 2.69
Employee & 1 dependent $215.00 $ 54.82
Full Family $275.00 $145.35
KAISER
Employee only $136.62 $ 1.19
Employee & 1 dependent $215.00 $ 60.62
Full Family $275.00 $115.00
Dental. The Districts provide a Self Funded Dental Plan at no cost for employee only
coverage, and at $9.00 per month for full family coverage. The balance of the premium,
currently $26.50 for employee only and $65.25 for full family, is paid by the Districts.
Life. Non-exempt employees receive $15,000 of term life insurance; exempt employees
(Professional level and above) receive $50,000 of term life insurance coverage.
Short Term Disability. The Districts provide a non-work related, short-term disability
indemnity plan that pays two-thirds of an employee's salary up to $336 per week for up to 26
weeks following a fourteen calendar day waiting period.
-2 -
Long Term Disability. Upon completion of 5 years of service, the Districts provide a non-
work related, long-term disability indemnity plan that pays two-thirds of the employee's rate of
pay, not to exceed $5,000 per month, for up to two years, following a 90-day waiting period.
Employees who have less than 5 years of service may purchase the LTD coverage.
Retiring Employees. The Districts pay, for employees hired prior to July 1, 1988, two and
one-half months' premium for each year of continuous service of a retiring employee towards
the premium costs of coverage for the employee and eligible dependents under the Districts'
medical plans. The Districts also provide a retiree medical health premium offset program
established by the County of Orange wherein the cost of health premiums are offset by $10
per month for every year of service up to a maximum of $250 per month.
REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
Employees may participate in both a Medical and Dependent Care Reimbursement Account
under IRC provisions. Participation in these programs do not affect the Districts' contribution
to the Orange County Employees Retirement System.
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
The Districts provide confidential professional consultation and referral services to employees
and their dependents who may be experiencing problems which affect the employee's job
performance.
DEFERRED COMPENSATION
The Districts' Deferred Compensation Plan provides an opportunity for employees to defer
income tax liability on a portion of their wages until such time as those funds are withdrawn
from the fund because of death, disability, retirement, hardship or termination of employment.
Districts' Contribution
Employee Level
Non-Exempt Employees
Professional and Supervisory
Executive Management
Matching
-0-%
1.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
3.0%
Asst. Department Head
Department Head
Assistant General Manager
General Manager
TIME AWAY FROM WORK
Holidays. The following days are observed as holidays:
New Year's Day
Lincoln's Birthday
President's Day
Memorial Day
Independence Day
Labor Day
Veterans Day
Thanksgiving Day
Day After Thanksgiving
Day Before Christmas
Christmas Day
Floating Holiday
Non-Matching
-0-%
2.0%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.0%
$7500 annual
Personal Leave. Employees covered by the Operations and Maintenance Memorandum of
Understanding only receive Personal Leave in lieu of Vacation and Sick Leave. Personal
-3 -
"'-Leave is accrued at the rate of 80 hours in the first year, 140 hours in the second through
fourth years, and 180 hours per year in the fifth through tenth years. An additional 8 hours
per year is then added up to a maximum of 220 hours. Employees may only accrue up to
400 hours of Personal Leave as of the last day of the final pay period in December of each
year. Employees are paid in full for all hours accumulated in excess of 400 each January.
Sick Leave. Employees hired prior to November 27, 1981, accrue 91 hours per year;
employees hired on or after November 27, 1981, accrue 78 hours per year, beginning with
the first day of employment. Employees may elect annually to be paid for any unused sick
leave hours accrued through the end of December at their current hourly rate according to
the following payoff schedule:
Accrued Sick Leave Hours
0-100
101-240
241-560
Over 560 (Mandatory)
Rate of Payoff
0%
25%
35%
50%
Sick Leave Incentive Plan. If the average sick leave usage of employees in the
Professional, Supervisory and Executive Management Groups is under 40 hours per year, the
annual payoff for unused sick leave is as follows:
Accrued Sick Leave Hours
0 -100
101 -240
241 -560
Over 560 (mandatory)
Rate of Payoff
10%
40%
50%
60%
Vacation. Full-time employees not covered by Personal Leave provisions accrue vacation
leave, beginning with the first day of employment, in accordance with the following schedule:
Years of Service
At the end of 1st Year
In Years 2 through 4
In Years 5 through 10
In Year 11
In Year 12
In Year 13
In Year 14
In Year 15 and over
Hours -Biweekly
3.08
4.62
4.93
5.24
5.54
5.85
6.16
Hours -Annual
80
80
120
128
136
144
152
160
Vacation leave is accrued for all paid hours, including hours actually worked and hours in a
paid-leave payroll status, up to a maximum of 200 hours. Vacation leave in excess of 200
hours must be scheduled off or compensated for in January of each year, unless special
arrangements are made in advance with the employee's supervisor.
Bereavement Leave. An employee who is compelled to be absent from work because of the
death or imminent death of certain specified individuals is entitled to a maximum of 3 paid
working days leave.
-4 -
Jury Duty. Employees called for jury· duty will be granted a leave of absence with pay for
the actual time spent on jury service, less the amount of any jury duty pay received, exclusive
of mileage.
Military Leave of Absence. Employees who are recalled to active service in the Armed
Forces of the United States, the National Guard or who are required to fulfill obligations as
members of a Military Reserve Unit are provided leave in accordance with the provisions of
the Military and Veterans Code.
Witness Leave. Employees will be granted leaves of absence to serve as witnesses in
accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Sections 1230 and 1230.1 .
Leave of Absence Without Pay. Employees may request a Leave of Absence Without Pay
for up to one year to pursue a formal course of study or for other acceptable personal
reasons. Under the provisions of the federal Family and Medical Leave Act, employees are
entitled to 12 weeks of unpaid family or medical leave in a 12 month period for the birth or
adoption of a child, to provide care during a serious health condition of their child, parent or
spouse, or because of their own health condition.
RETIREMENT
The Districts offer participation in the Orange County Employees Retirement System,
wherein all full-time employees are considered members. The Districts contribute 4.5% of an
eligible employee's base salary towards the employee's contribution to the system in addition
to the Districts' share of the regular contribution.
BENEFIT OPTIONS PLANS
Professional, Supervisory and Executive Management employees who have successfully
completed their initial probationary period are entitled to participate in an Benefits Option
Plan. Under the provisions of the three plans, employees will be reimbursed to cover
expenses for job related professional membership dues, licenses or certificates, subscriptions
and journals, as follows: Professional -$ 500; Supervisory -$1000; Executive Management -
$1250. Professional employees are also entitled to tuition reimbursement of up to $250
annually for job related courses.
TRADITIONAL 5-STEP MERIT PAY PROGRAM
Employees in this program, who are generally non-exempt and represented by either OCEA
or IUOE Local 501, receive a step advance upon completion of probation and upon
completion of a successful annual review. These employees typically reach the top of their
range in 3.5 years. Salary ranges in this group are established with the fifth step equal to the
market rate.
MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE REVIEW PLAN
Professional, Supervisory and Management Group employees in the MPRP Program are
eligible for performance based salary adjustments effective the first pay period following the
beginning of each fiscal year. The actual amount of the adjustment is determined by
guidelines established annually by the Districts' Boards of Directors and General Manager in
conformance with provisions of the MPRP Program and Compensation Policy. Employees in
this program do not receive step advances or other salary adjustment except upon
promotion. Salary ranges in this group are set with the midpoint equal to the market rate.
6-23-95
REF:GH
COMPENSATION PROGRAM COMPARISON
OCEA UNITS 0 AND M UNIT PROF & SUPV EXEC MGMT
5 Step Plan
( Step 5 Set at Market t/ t/
5.5% Anniversary Merit Increase t/ t/
5.5% at Completion of Probation t/ t/
5.5% for Promotion t/ t/
Negotiated Range Adjustment Increase t/ t/
MPRP Expanded Range Plan
Midpoint Set at Market t/ t/
Annual Adjustment in July
Based on Performance Rating t/ t/
Limit of 20% in Top Quartile t/ t/
Overtime Pay
Time-and-One-Half t/
Straight-Time t/
Other Bonuses
Shift Differential t/ t/
Standby Pay t/ t/
Call Back Pay t/ t/
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PROGRAM COMPARISON
OCEA UNITS 0 AND M UNIT PROF & SUPV EXEC MGMT
Time Away From Work
Vacation t/ t/ t/
Sick Leave t/ t/ t/
Personal Leave t/
Holidays t/ t/ t/ t/
Deferred Compensation
No Match -No Non-Match
1 % Match -2% Non-Match t/
2% Match -2.5% Non-Match t/1
3% Match -3% Non-Match t/2
Insurance
Medical t/ t/ t/ t/
Dental t/ t/ t/ t/
$15,000 Life t/ t/
$50,000 Life t/ t/
Short/Long Term Disability t/ t/ t/ t/
Benefit Option Plan
$750 ($250 Tuition Reimburse) t/
$1000 t/
$1250
1 Assistant Department Head Only
2 Department Head Only
FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN
RESOURCES COMMITTEE
FAHR95-31:
Summary:
AGENDA FOR
JULY 12, 1995
Consideration of Motion to Adopt Investment
Performance Review Guidelines for the Districts'
Investment Program
On May 24, 1995, the Board of Directors approved the Investment Program Policy
Statement recommended by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources
Committee.
On June 28, 1995, the Board of Directors selected Pacific Investment Management
Company (PIMCO) as External Money Manager, and Mellon Trust/Boston Safe Deposit
& Trust Company (Mellon) as Custodial Bank, as recommended by the FAHR
Committee.
This agenda item presents recommendations for the ongoing monitoring, review, and
reporting of investment program performance to the FAHR Committee and the Boards
of Directors.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee
approve the following actions:
1. Adopt the investment performance benchmarks for the Liquid Operating
Monies fund and for the Long-Term Operating Fund as described in the
attached staff report.
2. Adopt the contents and frequency of investment performance reports as
described in the attached staff report.
J:IWPDOCIFINICRANEIFPC.MTGIFPC95VTEMS.AG~AHR95.31
.. ~\ July 12, 1995
FAHR95-31
Background
STAFF REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
P.O, BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
(7141962-2411
Consideration of Performance Review Guidelines
For the Districts' Investment Program
On May 24, 1995, the Boards of Directors approved the Investment Program Policy
Statement recommended by the Finance, Administration & Human Resources
Committee (the "Committee").
On June 28, 1995, the Boards of Directors selected Pacific Investment Management
Company (PIMCO) as External Money Manager, and Mellon TrusUBoston Safe Deposit
& Trust Company (Mellon) as Custodial Services Bank, and authorized staff to negotiate
professional service agreements, as recommended by the Committee.
) The Districts' Investment Policy designates the Committee as the oversight committee
for the Districts' Investment Policy and Program, and states that the Committee shall
adopt guidelines for the ongoing review of duration, quality, and liquidity of the Districts'
portfolio. Also, the Committee shall review the Districts' Investment Policy on an annual
basis, and recommend revisions to the Boards of Directors, as appropriate.
Monitoring & Review Program
Active monitoring and periodic reporting are essential to an effective, ongoing review
process for the Districts' Investment Program. The agreements with the Money
Manager, PIMCO, and the Custodial Bank, Mellon Trust, will require each firm to submit
periodic reports to the Districts that will track individual investment transactions, as well
as overall portfolio performance. The value of the Districts' portfolios will be marked to
market each month.
In addition, the Districts' Investment Advisor, Callan Associates, will measure the
performance of the portfolios and the Money Manager against recommended
benchmarks and report their findings to the Districts each quarter. The Districts' Money
Manager, PIMCO, and Investment Advisor, Callan, will both meet with the Committee
each quarter to review investment performance, proposed strategies, and compliance
with the Investment Policy (Section 14.2). Districts' staff will coordinate these efforts
and will provide additional monitoring and analysis using the Bloomberg financial
information system.
FAHR95-31
Page2
July 12, 1995
Performance Benchmarks and Objectives
The overall investment objective described in the Districts' Investment Policy is to obtain
a rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, commensurate with
investment risk constraints and cash flow needs (Section 13.0). The cash flow needs
will be based on a five-year cash flow forecast, which will be updated quarterly, as
required by the Investment Policy (Section 7.1 ).
To ensure that the Districts' investment objectives are being met on an ongoing basis,
the performance of the portfolio, and that of the Investment Manager, will be measured
each quarter. The Districts' Investment Advisor recommends that the benchmarks
described below be used to measure the investment performance of the Liquid
Operating Monies Fund and the Long-Term Operating Monies Fund in achieving the
objectives of the Investment Policy.
Callan Associates recommends the use of two benchmarks for each portfolio. The first
is a Market Index Benchmark which reflects the rate-of-return for investments with
similar maturities. The second is a Peer Group Benchmark which reflects the returns
achieved by other active money managers with similar objectives. The attached Callan
report (Attachment "A") presents their analysis and rationale for the benchmark
recommendations. The benchmarks are summarized as follows:
Liquid Operating Monies
o The 3-month T-bill rate will be the Market Index Benchmark for the short-term
operating fund.
o The Callan Active Cash Fixed-Income Style Group will be the Peer Group
Benchmark for the short-term operating fund.
Long-Term Operating Monies
o The Merrill Lynch Government and Corporate 1 to 5-year Maturity Index will
be the Market Index Benchmark for the long-term fund.
o The Callan Defensive Fixed-Income Style Group will be the Peer Group
Benchmark for the long-term fund.
Ongoing Reporting
The basic requirements for monthly reports about the Investment Program to the
Committee are described in Investment Policy (Section 14.0). These reports, together
with quarterly reports and the annual review, will provide the Committee with the
information needed to evaluate risk, duration, quality, and liquidity characteristics of the
Districts' Investment Program.
)
FAHR95-31
Page3
July 12, 1995
The attached matrix (Attachment "B") presents a reference list to the recommended
contents of the monthly and quarterly reports that will be submitted to the Committee
and to the Boards of Directors.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee
approve the following actions:
1. Adopt the investment performance benchmarks for the Liquid
Operating Monies fund and for the Long-Term Operating Fund as
described in this report.
2. Adopt the contents and frequency of investment performance reports
as described in this report.
SK:lc
J:\WPDOC'FIN\CRANEV'PC.MTG'FPC95\STAFFRPT.FPC\FAHR95.31
Attachments
JUL 03 '95 11:35 FR ~~~N H~SLJ(.;lt4TE:i JI0.5 c~d dd.j:::J I u ::.HN l I LJ l ~ I -ul": ,_ I I"" • t:)~ 0 ' I
June 29, 1995
SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Perfonnauce Review of the Districts' Investment Program
Background
Pursuant to Section 15.2 of the Investment St.atement, the Districts shall adopt guidelines for the
ongoing review of the investment program. The Districts are aware that the ongoing review and
analysis of the inves1ment manager is just as important as the due diligence during the manager
selection process. Accordingly, the Districts will evaluate the investment manager's performance
to detennine that the objectives of the investment program arc being met, and the guidelines
contained in the Investment Statement are still appropriate for achieving the objectives.
Quarterly performance will be evaluated for evidence of progress toward the attainment oflong-
tenn targets. In particular, the Committee will meet regularly to review:
• the manager's adherence to the Investment Statement, including the guidelines for duration,
credit quality t and liquidity;
• any material changes in the manager's organization. investment philosophy, or personnel; and
• comparison of the manager's investment retums to appropriat.e benehmarkst as de.fined below.
Benclnnarks
The returns for each portfolio will be compared to at least two benchmarks: a market index and a
peer group. The market index reflects the return available from a passive approach, while the
peer group reflects the retu.ms achieved by other active managers with similar objectives,
operating in the same marketplace.
Liquid Qperatinr: Monies
The shorH.erm operating fund will be compared to the 3-month T-bill rate and the
Callan Active cash Fued-Income Style Group. The Callan Active QWi Fixed
Income Style Group represents a peer group of managers who operate with a
muimwn maturity of one year.
Lop:g Term Qpe@ting Monies
The long-term operating fund will be compared to the Merrill Lynch
Government & Corporate 1 to 5 Year Maturity Index and to the Callan
JUL 03 '95 11:3s FR CALLRN HS50CiHTES 303 8~2 8230 10 ~~JI Ui~l-u~ ~1 ~.~~
Defensive Fixed-Income Style Group. The Merrill Lynch Government &
Corporate 1 to 5 Year Maturity Index represents the broadest measure of
government and corporate fixed income securities with maturities ranging
from one year to five years. The Callan Defensive Fixed-Income Style
Group represents a peer group of active managers that generate risk and
return results com.parable to that of the Menill Lynch 1 to 3 Year Treasury
lnde.x, which is slightly shorter in duration than the 1 to 5 Year Maturity
Index.
The risk associated with each fund, as me8Sl..ired by the variability of quarterly returns (standard
deviation). must not exceed that of the benchmark index and the peer group without a
corresponding increase in perfonnance above the benchmark or peer group.
Quarterly performance will be evaluated for evidence of progress toward the attainment of long-
t.erm targets. It is understood that there may be short-term periods during which performance
deviates from maI:ket indices. Over trailing three year and longer periods, each fund is expected
to peiform in the upper SO percentile of the manager's style group, and to exceed the benchmark
index with appropriate risk.
In addition to re.gTJlar quarterly reviews, the investment manager would merit immediate review in
the event of major organizational changes, including: change in ownership, change in professional
staff, significant account loss, etc.·
JUL 05 '95 15:05 FR CAL.l.fiN RSSOCIHTES
FAHR95~31 rA I CALLAN ASSOCIATES INC.
\..01 San Fronci.sco, New· York. Chicago, Atlanta. Denver
July 5, 1995
Mr. Steve Kozak
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
10844 Ellis A venue
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Dear Steve;
303 832 8230 T~lT DlSl-U~ l.I t-'.~.:::
( ATTACHMENT A
RUTHANN C MOOMV
Vice President
SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Performance Review of the Districts' Investment Program
Tue purpose of my letter is co establish the benchmarks to use in evaluating the returns achieved
by the investment manager. The recommended guidelines and benchmarks are provided in
Attachment I. If the Board approves the recommendations, the Attachment is in a form.at suitable
for handing off to the investment manager. This letter provides additional background
information and rationale f o~ the recommendations.
Benchmarks
The perlonnance evaluation of the investment manager will be based on the total returns earned
on the fund, and by the degree of risk undertaken to achieve those returns. By total return we
mean the return from income earned, realized gains or losses, and the change in unrealized gain or
loss, based on market values. The need to account for unrealized gains or losses makes it
necessary to mark·to-market the portfolio. Once the return has been calculat.ed, it should be
compared to a relevant benchmark.. Given the short term volatility of financial markets, the
pattern of returns earned on the fund is likely to be volatile. Thus, an absolute return expectation
is not very useful for evaluating performance. Instead, an investment manager should be
evaluated relative to returns in the f"inancial markets over the relevant time period.
In our view, each investment manager should be compared to at least two benchmarks: a market
index and a peer group. The market index represents the universe of securities that the manager
could buy -it reflects the retu...tn available from a passive approach of holding all eligible
securities. The peer group reflects the returns achie,ved by other active managers with similar
objectives1 operating in the same marketplace. Callan Associates has developed appropriate peer
groups. referred to as Style Groups, t1'Jough extensive research and the development of a
comprehensive database.
550 East 8th Avenue. Denvi:.r. '2() 80203 • 30:3 I g32-8~28 ·FOY 303 I 832-8230
JUL 05 '% 15:07 FR CRLL8t-l HSSOCIRTES 3~3 832 8230 TO 5f:jt!J1 Dl~1-U~ ~1 ~-~~
Mr. St.eve Kozak
Page2
Julys. 1995
An exa."Ilple of a 11".arket index is the Merrill Lynch Government & Corporat.e 1 to 5 Year
Maturity Index. Since this index is a broad measure of the government and corporate fixed
income securities with marurities from one to five years, it represents the universe of securities
available to your investment manager. All example of a peer group is the Callan Defensive Fixed-
lncorne Style Group. This style group most closely represents a peer group of active managers
that generate risk and return results comparable to that of the Merrill Lynch I to 3 Year Treasury
Index, which is slightly shorter in duration than ·me 1 to S Year Maturity Index.
The specific benchmarks proposed for the Districts' two funds are:
Liquid Operating Monies
The short-term operating fund will be compared to the 3-month T-bill rate and the
Callan Active Cash Fixed-Income Style Group. The Callan Active Cash Fixed
Income Style Group represents a peer group of managers who operate with a
maximum maturity of one year.
Long Term Operating Monie~
The long-term operating fund will be compared to the Menill Lynch
Govemment & Corporate 1 to 5 Year Maturity Index and to the cailan
Defensive Fixed-Income Style Group.
The investment manager chosen by the Committee is expected to add value through modest
duration shifts. sector selection and individual security selection. It would be inappropriate for
the manager to seek higher returns by subjecting the funds to higher risks. Therefore. tbe risk
associated with each fund, as measu..'"ed by the variability of quarterly returns (st.andard deviation),
\\'ill also be monitored. The standard deviation of returns for each fund should not exceed that of
the benchmark index and the peer group by more than 20 percent.
JUL 05 ,; 95 15: 07 FR ~~N RSSOC IRTES
I
Mr. Steve Kozak
Page3
July 5.1995
Over the Longer Tenn
303 832 8230 T~~ll Dl~l-U~ ~I ~.~4
( '
The focus of the Committee will be on achieving long term objectives. It is our observation that
fiduciaries who keep a focus on the long term objectives achieve a higher degree of success in
their investment programs. Quarterly performance will be evaluated for evidence of progress
toward the attainment of long-term targets. It is understood that there may be short-tenn periods
during which performance deviates from market indices. Over trailing three year and longer
periods, each fund is expected to perform in the upper 50 percentile of the manager's style group,
and to exceed the benchmark index with appropriate risk.
Duration
A rule-of-thumb for estimating the duration of a fixed income security of less than one year
maturity is to equate the duration to the maturity. For example, a 90 day Treasury bill has a
duration of 90 days (0.25); and a one year Treasury has a duration slightly less than l. Thus, the
maximum duration of 90 days specified for the Liquid Operating account in section 7 .2.1.2. is
fairly conservative, and is equivalent to a weighted average matUrity of 90 days. The account
could still hold a security with a one year maturity, but the account would need to counter the
effect of the one year security by shortening the remainder of the portfolio. If the Districts also
maintain some operating cash, the duration of the Liquid Operating account could be extended to
6 months, which is still conservative but would add a bit of additional return.
The duration target of the Long Term Operating Monies account should be set equal to that of
the benchmark. The duration of the Merrill Lynch Government & Corporate 1 to 5 Year Index is
approximately 2.5. The duration changes slightly as interest rates change, and has varied from
2.43 to 2.53 over the last three years. The investment guidelines would permit the manager to
vary duration by plus or minus 20 percent from that of the benclunark, which results in a range of
2.0 to 3.0. This guideline appears consistent with the amount of risk that the Districts are willing
to assume. while still providing the manager with a useful tool for adding value.
Yours truly,
~rn , C.M~
Vice President
attachment
·.
JUL 05 '95 15:08 FR o::ll AN RSSOCIATES 303 832 8230 TO SAN IT DIST-uk Cl ~-~~
Attachment I
July 5, 1995
SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Performance Review of the Distrids' Investment Program
Backgrognd
Pursuant to Section 15..2 of the Investment Statement, the Districts shall adopt guidelines for the
ongoing review of the investment program. The Districts are aware that the ongoing review and
analysis of the investment manager is just as important as the due diligence during the manager
selection process. Accordingly. the Districts will evaluate the investment manager's perf onnance
to determine that the objectives of the investment program are being met, and the guidelines
contained in the Investment Statement are still appropriate for achieving the objectives.
Quarterly perfonnance will be evaluated for evidence of progress toward the attainment of long-
term targets. In particular, the Committee will meet regularly to review:
• the manager's adherence to the Investment Statement. including the guidelines for duration,
credit quality, and liquidity;
• any material changes in the manager• s organization, investment philosophy, or personnel; and
• comparison of the manager; s investtnent returns to appropriate benchmarks, as defined below.
Benchmarks
The perfonnance evaluation of the investment manager will be based on the overall returns earned
en the funcL and by the degree of risk tmdertaken to achieve those returns. Overall return. also
called total return, is the sum of income earned, realized return, and the change in unrealized gain
or loss, based on market values. Given the short tenn volatility of financial markets, the pattern
of returns earned on the fund is likely to be volatile.
The investment manager for each fund should be compared to two benchmarlcs: a market index
and a peer group. The market index represents the universe of securities that the manager could
buy --it reflects the return available from a passive approach of holding all eligible securities. The
peer group reflects the returns achieved by other active managers with similar objectives,
operating in the same marketplace.
Callan Associates Inc. l
JUL 05 '35 1s:0s FR CALLB.N R5SOC1Hl~S
The specific benchmarks for the Districts· two funds are!
Liquid Operating Monies
The short-term operating fund will be compared to the 3-month T-bill rate and the
Callan Active Cssh Fixed-Income Style Group. The Callan Active Cash Fixed
Income Style Group represents a peer group of managers who operate with a
maximum maturity of one year.
Long Term Operating Monies
The long-tenn operating fund will be compared to the MeITill Lynch
Government & Corporate l to S Year Maturity Index and to the Callan
Defensive F'ixed-Income Style Group.
The risk associated with each fund, as measUted by the variability of quarterly returns (standard
deviation)t will also be monitored. The standard deviation of returns for each fund should not
exceed that of the benchmark index and the peer group by more than 20 percent.
Over tbe Longer Tenn
The focus of the Committee will be on achieving long term objectives. Quarterly performance
will be evaluated for eviden~ of progress toward the attainment of long-term targets. It is
understood that there may be 'short-term periods during which performance deviates from market
indices. Over trailing three year and longer periods, each fund is expected to perform in the upper
SO percentile of the manager's style group, and to exceed the benchmalk index with appropriate
risk.
Callan Associates Inc. 2
FAHR95-31
POLICY
REFERENCE
14.1.1
14.1.2
14.1.3
14.1.4
14.1.5
14.1.6
14.1.7
14.1.8
14.1.9
ADDL**
ADDL**
ADDL**
ADDL**
Notes
*M =Monthly a = Quarterly
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING
FOR THE
DISTRICTS' INVESTMENT PROGRAM
PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTIC
Cost and market value of the portfolio (monthly mark-to-market).
Modified duration of the portfolio compared to benchmark.
Dollar change in value of the portfolio for a 1 % change in interest rate.
Percent of portfolio invested in reverse repurchase agreements, and a schedule which matches the
maturity of such reverse repurchase agreements with the cash flows which are available to repay
them at maturity.
For the Liquid Operating Monies account only, the percent of portfolio maturing within 90 days.
Average portfolio credit quality.
Percent of portfolio with credit ratings below ·A" by any rating agency, and a description of such
securities.
Listing of any transactions or holdings which do not comply with this policy or with the California
Government Code.
Time-weighted total rate of return for the portfolio for the prior three months, twelve months, year-
to-date, and since Inception compared to the benchmark returns for the same periods.
Comparison of portfolio performance to market index benchmark.
Comparison of Manager's performance to peer group benchmark.
Monitoring of organizational and structural changes of investment management firm.
Audit portfolios for compliance with investment policy guidelines.
.. ADDL = Monitoring of Additional Performance Characteristics
... ,. -... . ...
ATTACHMENT "B"
REPORTING PARTY"
PIMCO MELLON CALLAN )
M,Q M,Q a
M,Q a
M,Q a
M,Q a
M,Q M,Q a
M,Q M,Q a
M,Q M,Q a
M,Q a )
M,Q a
M,Q a
a
a
a
.•,
L
FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN
RESOURCES COMMITTEE
AGENDA FOR
JULY 12, 1995
FAHR95-32: Consideration of Proposed Changes to the IRS-Approved
Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan as follows:
Summary:
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_ Approving
Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan for
Officers and Employees in Order to Permit Greater
Flexibility in Plan Distribution Elections, Clarify
... Certain Provisions of the Plan, and Comply with
Certain Recent Internal Revenue Service
Interpretations.
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_ Approving
Amended Deferred Compensation Program for
General Manager, Assistant General Manager and
Department Heads and Resolution No. 95-_
Approving Amended Deferred Compensation Program
for Assistant Department Heads, Professional and
Supervisory Employees, and Executive Assistants,
Both in Order to Include Modifications to the Vesting
Periods for Districts' Contributions.
The Committee is being asked to consider three Resolutions. The first is to adopt an
Amendment to the Plan in order to permit greater flexibility in plan distribution elections,
clarify certain plan provisions and comply with certain IRS interpretations; the second is
to approve an Amended Plan for General Manager, Assistant General Managers and
Department Heads; and the third is to approve an Amended Plan for Assistant
Department Heads and Professional and Supervisory Employees and Executive
Assistants.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee
recommend approval of (a) the First Amendment to the CSDOC Deferred
Compensation Plan and; (b) modifications to the vesting requirements for Districts'
contributions to the Management Deferred Compensation Program.
J:\WPOOC\FIN\CRAN8FPC.MTG\FPC95\ITEMS.AGOIFAHRllS.32
July 12, 1995
FAHR95-32
STAFF REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
17141962-2411
Consideration of Proposed Changes to the IRS-Approved Section
457 Deferred Compensation Plan as follows:
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_ Approving
Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers
and Employees in Order to Permit Greater Flexibility in Plan
Distribution Elections, Clarify Certain Provisions of the
Plan, and Comply with Certain Recent Internal Revenue
Service Interpretations.
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 95-_Approving Amended
Deferred Compensation Program for General Manager,
Assistant General Manager and Department Heads and
Resolution No. 95-_ Approving Amended Deferred
Compensation Program for Assistant Department Heads,
Professional and Supervisory Employees, and Executive
Assistants, Both in Order to Include Modifications to the
Vesting Periods for Districts' Contributions.
In 1975, the Districts adopted our first Deferred Compensation Plan for the benefit of
management employees. During the intervening twenty years, there have been four
amendments to the Plan, principally to comply with changes in the Internal Revenue
Service regulations, but also to expand the Plan to allow participation by all other
employees and by the Directors.
The Committee is being asked to consider three Resolutions. The first is to adopt an
Amendment to the Plan in order to permit greater flexibility in Plan distribution elections,
to clarify certain provisions of the Plan, and to comply with certain recent Internal
Revenue Service interpretations; the second is to approve an Amended Plan for
General Manager, Assistant General Managers and Department Heads; and the third is
to approve an Amended Plan for Assistant Department Heads and Professional and
Supervisory Employees. The IRS has expressed certain opinions regarding {1) the
ability of Plan participants to delay making a decision on the desired form of benefits
until shortly before benefit payments are to begin, and (2) the requirement that
combination benefits (lump-sum plus distributions over time) cannot be paid in
increasing amounts, with the result that any lump sum must be paid on the same date
as the first distribution over time is made. Also, general counsel has suggested revising
the plan-to-plan transfer provisions to make clear that transfers can be made either to or
from another employer's Section 457 plan.
FAHR95-32
Page 2
July 12, 1995
Staff is proposing modifying the vesting requirements for Districts' contributions to the
Deferred Comp accounts for General Manager, Assistant General Managers,
Department Heads, Professional and Supervisory Employees and Executive Assistants.
These changes will make the vesting requirements the same for so-called "matching"
and "non-matching" contributions, at one year of participation. This simplification will
reduce staff time required to administer and monitor the program and will allow the use
of the third-party administrator in accordance with an Ernest & Young recommendation.
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee
recommend approval of (a) the First Amendment to the CSDOC Deferred
Compensation Plan and; (b) modifications to the vesting requirements for Districts'
contributions to the Management Deferred Compensation Plan.
GGS:lc
J:\WPDOCv=tN'CRANE'f'PC.MTG'f'PC95\STAFFRPT.FPC'f'AHR95.32
RESOLUTION NO. 95----
APPROVING AMENDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM
FOR GENERAL MANAGER. ASSISTANT GENERAL
MANAGERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REVISIONS TO THE'
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM FOR THE GENERAL
MANAGER, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGERS AND
DEPARTMENT HEADS OF THE DISTRICTS AND
REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 87-113
* * * * * * * * *
REDLINE
WHEREAS, in conjunction with the Districts• Deferred
Compensation P.lan, the Districts, by Resolution No. 87-113,
adopted ~y the Boards of Directors on August 8, 1987, have
previously approved specified Districts contriputions to the
individual deferred compensation accounts of the General Manager,
Assistant General Managers, and Department Heads of the
Districts; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 95-54, adopted by the Boards of
Directors on May 24, 1995, the Districts have reaffirmed the
amount of the Districts contributions to the individual deferred
compensation accounts of the General Manager, Assistant General
Manag~rs, and Department Heads; and,
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors desire to revise the
program of Districts contributions for such employees in order to
change the vesting period with respect to such Districts
contributions.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,
DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the Districts hereby approve a contribution
of Districts funds, in an annual sum equal to $7500.00, to the
respective individual deferred compensation accounts of each of
the General Manager and the Assistant General Managers (the
11 Districts Bon-llatchinq Fun4s contribution for General/Assistant
General Manaqers11 ).
That the Districts hereby approve a contribution of
Districts funds, to the respective individual deferred
compensation accounts of the Department Heads, in an annual sum
equal to a maximum of three percent (3%) of the gross annual
salary of each of the respective Department Heads (the "Districts
llatchinq Fun4s contribution for Department Heads"), provided that
each such employee voluntarily withholds from his/her salary, and
contributes an equal sum, to his/her individual deferred
compensation account.
That the Districts hereby approve an additional contribution
(the 11 Districts Bon-llatchinq Funds contribution for Department
Heads11 ), to the respective individual deferred compensation
accounts of the Department Heads, in an annual sum equal to three
percent (3%) of the gross annual salary of each of the respective
Department Heads, exclusive of the Districts Hatchinq Funds
Contribution for Department Heads as hereinabove described,
2000-00019
15297_1 2
without the requirement of any matching contribution by the
individual employees.
That in the event the total sum contributed to the
individual deferred compensation accounts of the Department
Heads, comprised of the three percent (3%) Districts Bon-Hatchinq
FUD4s contributions for Department Heads, the three percent (3%)
Districts Matchinq Funds contributions for Department Heads_, and
the three percent (3%) matching funds contributions from the
employee, exceeds the maximum permissible dollar amount of
deferred compensation, as prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code
or U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, the Districts shall
continue to provide three percent (3%) Districts Bon-llatchinq
Fun4s Contributions for Department Heads and three percent (3%)
Districts Hatchinq Fun4s contributions for Department Heads to
the extent that such total Districts contributions do not exceed
the maximum allowed by law, and the individual employee shall
only be required to contribute such matching funds contributions
as will provide a total of all contributions that will equal the
maximum allowed by law.
That upon the completion of one year of employment with the
Districts and one year of participation in the Def erred
Compensation Plan, all Districts llatchinq Fun4s Contributions for
Department Heads then on deposit in the individual employee's
deferred compensation account shall be deemed vested, and,
thereafter, all Districts Matchinq FUDds contributions for
Department Heads deposited into the individual employee's
2000-00019
15297_1 3
def erred compensation account shall be deemed vested upon
deposit. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, upon
the death, or upon the Normal or Late Retirement (as those terms
are defined in the Deferred Compensation Plan}, of the employee,
irrespective of the length of his/her employment with the
District~ ~nd of his/her participation in the Deferred
Compensation Plan, all Districts Hatching Fun4s contributions for
Department Beads then on deposit in the individual employee's
deferred compensation account shall be deemed vested. Once
Districts Hatching Fun4s Contributions for Department Beads have
vested as described in this paragraph, they may thereafter be
withdrawn to the extent otherwise permitted under the Deferred
Compensation Plan.
That Districts Bon-Hatching Pun4s Contributions (for
General/ Assistant General Managers and for Department Heads)
shall vest and shall be subject to withdrawal under the same
conditions as Districts Hatching Funds Contributions for
Department Beads., with two exceptions: (1) an employee who
terminates service with the Distriets for a reason other than due
to }1ormal or Late Retirement or death shall have :Ao vested
interest i:A, a:Ad shall not be entitled to withdraw, any Districts
Non Matching .Funds Contributions deposited into the employee's
def erred eompe:Asation account during the one year ilftlftediately
preceding such termination of service, afid (2) in no event may an
employee withdraw, in eon:Aection with an emcrgeney withdrawal,
any Districts llon Hatching Funds Contributions deposited into the
2000-00019
15297_1 4
. •
cmpleyee•s deferred eempensatien aeeeunt durin~ the one year
ilft:lfteaiately preeeain~ a request for emer~eney withdrawal.
Section 2. This program shall be for the benefit of the
General Manager, the Assistant General Managers and the
Department Heads, which classifications are set forth on
Attachment "1," which is incorporated herein by reference, and
shall be terminated only by action of the Boards of Directors.
In the event other classifications are added to the category of
Department Heads by action of the General Manager or Boards of
Directors of Districts, said classes shall be deemed to be
governed by this Resolution concurrently therewith.
Section 3. The General Manager and the Director of Finance
are hereby authorized to execute individual Deferred Compensation
Participation Agreements with each eligible employee, and are
further authorized to execute any and all documents relating to
investment and payment transactions relating to the Def erred
Compensation Plan, provided that such documents are approved as
to form by the Districts• General Counsel.
Section 4. Resolution No. 87-113 is hereby repealed, and
the provisions herein shall become effective, upon adoption of
this Resolution; the provisions herein shall remain in effect
until amended or terminated by resolution of the Boards of
Directors.
2000-00019
15297_1 5
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held
2000-00019
15297_1 6
)
ATTACHMENT "1"
1. General Manager
2. Assistant General Manager -Administration
3. Assistant General Manager -Operations
4 • "Department Heads" :
2000-00019
15297_1
A.
B. c.
D.
E.
F.
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
of Engineering
of Finance
of Human Resources
of Ma·intenance
of Operations of Technical Services
7
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
APPROVING AMENDMENT TO DEFERRED COMPENSATION
PLAN FOR OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13, AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO DEFERRED
COMPENSATION PLAN FOR THE OFFICERS AND
EMPLOYEES OF THE DISTRICTS
***********************************
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 94 .. 39, adopted by the Boards of Directors on
April 13, 1994, the Districts approved and adopted the County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, California Deferred Compensation Plan as Amended 1994 (hereinafter
referred to as the "Plan"); and,
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors desire to amend the Plan to permit greater
flexibility in plan distribution elections, to clarify certain provisions of the Plan, and to
comply with certain recent Internal Revenue Service interpretations.
NOW; THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
Deferred Compensation Plan as Amended 1994 is hereby amended as set forth in
Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as though set forth
herein at length, and as so amended shall remain in effect until further amended or
2000-00019
14643_1
terminated by Resolution of the Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Boards of Directors held
this __ day of ____ _, 1995.
2000-00019
14643_1
I ' I ~
FIRST AMENDMENT TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN AS AMENDED 1994
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 94-39, adopted by the Boards of Directors on
April 13, 1994, the Districts approved and adopted a revised deferred compensation
plan, i.e., the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Deferred
Compensation Plan as Amended 1994 (the "Plan");
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors desire to amend the Plan to permit greater
flexibility in plan distribution elections and to clarify certain provisions of the Plan;
THEREFORE, pursuant to Resolution No. 95-_, adopted by the Boards of
Directors on , 1995 the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California do hereby amend the Plan as follows:
1. Section 3. 16 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following
language is hereby inserted in its place and stead:
"'Required Beginning Date' shall mean the latest date that distributions are
permitted to commence under Section 10.3."
2. Section 10.1 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following
language is hereby inserted in its place and stead:
"10.1 Termination of Employment by Retirement. The Participant is eligible to
receive distributions of benefits, with respect to retirement, after the
Participant has met the requirements for Normal Retirement and has
retired from service with the Employer. The Participant may submit to the
Employer an application for distribution of benefits under the Plan as early
as the date he notifies the Employer of his intended retirement and as late
as thirty (30) days following the actual date of termination of employment
due to retirement. Pursuant to such application, the Participant shall elect
one of the benefits payment options described below. Such election shall
become irrevocable upon the lapse of the thirtieth (30th) day following
termination of employment with the Employer due to retirement.
Following the Participant's termination of employment due to retirement
and the receipt of such application, the Employer shall pay to the
Participant one of the following benefits (expressed in terms of both
payment option and commencement date) as elected by the Participant:
PAYMENT OPTION -
(a) Consecutive equal monthly payments over a period of 36
1
EXHIBIT "A"
2000-00019
14831_1
months to 180 months, as determined by the Participant;
provided, however, that any such period may not extend
beyond the lite expectancy of the Participant or the joint life
and last survivor expectancy of the Participant and the
Participant's Category A Beneficiary. (This payment option
may be satisfied through annuity distributions.)
(b) Consecutive equal monthly payments for the life of the
Participant or for the lives of the Participant and his Category
A Beneficiary. (This payment option may be satisfied
through annuity distributions.)
(c) A single payment equal to the balance of the Participant's
Investment Account.
(d) A single lump-sum payment in an amount to be determined
by the Participant, with the remainder of the Participant's
Investment Account to be paid under either payment option
(a) or payment option (b) above.
COMMENCEMENT DATE OPTION -
(a) The first day of the third calendar month following the month
in which termination of employment occurs, or
(b) The first day of a later month as designated by the
Participant.
In the case of payment option (d) above, the lump sum must be
paid on the same date that the first payment over time is paid.
DELAYED PAYMENT ELECTION OPTION -
The irrevocable election which must be submitted to the Employer
no later than thirty (30) days following termination of employment
with the Employer due to retirement may specify the elected
commencement date option only, deferring the election as to the
particular payment option. In such case, the Participant must later
submit an election as to the payment option. Such later election
must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days before the
previously elected commencement date and shall become
irrevocable on the date thirty (30) days before such previously
elected commencement date. Should the Participant fail to timely
submit a separate payment option election hereunder, the
2
Employer shall pay the sum in the Participant's Investment Account
to the Participant according to payment option (c) above, on the
previously elected commencement date.
The foregoing options are limited by, and these payments shall be made
subject to, the provisions of Sections 10.3, 10.5, 10.6 and 10. 7 hereof.
The total amount of any benefits paid pursuant to payment options (a)
through ( d) above shall not exceed the sum of the amounts deferred by
the Participant, as adjusted for any earnings or losses thereon.
Should the Participant fail to elect one of the benefits hereunder by way of
an application for retirement benefits filed with the Employer within thirty
(30) days after retirement, the Employer shall pay the sum in the
Participant's Investment Account according to the "Benefit A" election
previously made pursuant to either the Participation Agreement or a
modification thereof. However, if there is no such previous election, then
the Employer shall pay the sum in the Participant's Investment Account
according to payment option (c) above on the Required Beginning Date."
3. Subsection 10.6.2 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following
language is hereby inserted in its place and stead:
"10.6.2
2000-00019
14831_1
When Participant Dies either before the Required Beginning Date
or before Distributions Have Begun. If a Participant dies either
before the Required Beginning Date or before distribution of his
Investment Account has begun, and, if any portion of the
Investment Account is payable to (or for the benefit of) a Category
A or B Beneficiary, then the Employer shall pay such portion as
follows -
CATEGORY A BENEFICIARIES
(1) if the Category A Beneficiary is other than the
surviving spouse, the portion of the Investment Account
payable to such beneficiary shall be distributed according to
one of the following options:
(a)
(b)
Consecutive equal monthly payments over a
period of 36 months to 60 months (but not
exceeding the life expectancy of the Category
A Beneficiary);
A single lump-sum payment; or
3
2000-00019
14831_1
(c) A single lump-sum payment in an amount to be
determined by the Participant, with the
remainder of the Participant's Investment
Account to be paid under payment option (a).
Such distributions shall begin on the date designated
by either the Participant or, if permitted by the
Participant, the Category A Beneficiary, but in no
event later than December 31 of the calendar year
immediately following the calendar year in which the
Participant dies. If payment is made under payment
option (c) above, the lump sum must be paid on the
same date that the first payment over time is paid.
(2) if the Category A Beneficiary is the surviving spouse of
the Participant, the portion of the Investment Account
payable to the surviving spouse shall be distributed
according to one of the following options:
(a) Consecutive equal monthly payments over a
period not to extend beyond the life expectancy
of the surviving spouse;
(b) A single lump-sum payment; or
(c) A single lump-sum payment in an amount to be
determined by the Participant, with the
remainder of the Participant's Investment
Account to be paid under payment option (a).
Such distributions shall begin on the date designated
by either the Participant or, if permitted by the
Participant, the surviving spouse, but in no event later
than the later of (i) December 31 of the calendar year
immediately following the calendar year in which the
Participant dies, and (ii) December 31 of the calendar
year in which the Participant would have attained age
701h. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, if as of
the date of the Participant's death, both the surviving
spouse and another are Category A Beneficiaries,
then distributions shall begin on or before December
31 of the calendar year immediately following the
calendar year in which the Participant dies. If
payment is made under payment option (c) above, the
4
2000-00019
14831_1
lump sum must be paid on the same date that the first
payment over time is paid.
CATEGORY B BENEFICIARIES
(3) if the beneficiary is a Category B Beneficiary, which is a
validly existing legal entity (such as a charitable foundation
or the estate of the Participant), the portion of the Investment
Account payable to such beneficiary shall be distributed as a
lump sum on the first day of the third calendar month
following the month in which the death of the Participant
occurs.
All elections (as to both payment option and commencement date)
to be made under this Subsection 10.6.2(1 )(2) shall be made by the
Participant pursuant to either the "Benefit C" provisions of the
Participation Agreement or a later written election delivered to the
Employer before the death of the Participant. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, however, the Participant, in the Participation Agreement
or such later written election, may specify that, following the death
of the Participant, the Category A Beneficiary may elect, subject to
the foregoing limitations, the form of payments and the
commencement date of distributions. Any such beneficiary
election, however, must be in the form of an irrevocable written
election filed with the Employer no later than ninety (90) days
following the date of death of the Participant. In the absence of any
such timely election, the portion of the Investment Account payable
to such Category A Beneficiary shall be distributed to him in a lump
sum on the first day of the fifth calendar month following the month
in which the death of the Participant occurs.
If a Category A Beneficiary dies within six months of the date of the
Participant's death and before the entire portion of the Investment
Account allocated to him has been paid pursuant to this Subsection
10.6.2, then the remainder of such portion shall be paid to the
contingent beneficiary, if any, designated by the Participant in either
the Participation Agreement or a later written election delivered to
the Employer before the Participant's death. If there is no such
contingent beneficiary, or if the Category A Beneficiary dies more
than six months after the date of the Participant's death and before
the entire portion of the Investment Account allocated to him has
been paid pursuant to this Subsection 10.6.2, then the remainder of
such portion shall be paid to the estate of the deceased Category A
Beneficiary. Any payment under this paragraph shall be made in a
5
lump sum on the first day of the third calendar month following the
month in which the death of the Category A Beneficiary occurs.
The Participant may designate a trust as his beneficiary under the
Plan. However, in that case, any beneficiary of the trust, who is
eligible to receive trust distributions on account of payments from
the Plan, shall be deemed to be a Category A Beneficiary under the
Plan. (For example, if the Participant designates as his beneficiary
a trust of which his surviving spouse is the life beneficiary, and
elects lifetime payments under option (2)(a) above, then for the
purpose of this Subsection 10.6.2, the surviving spouse shall be
deemed to bf? the Category A Beneficiary, and the terms of this
subsection shall be applied by basing distributions on the life
expectancy of the surviving spouse.) Notwithstanding the
foregoing, however, a trust may only be designated as a beneficiary
(and the beneficiary of the trust will only be deemed to be a
Category A Beneficiary) if, as of the later of the date that the
Participant submits to the Employer the election in which the trust is
named as a beneficiary or the Required Beginning Date, and as of
all subsequent periods during which the trust is named as a
beneficiary of the Plan, all of the following conditions are met: ( 1 )
the trust is a valid trust under state law, (2) the trust is irrevocable,
(3) the beneficiaries of the trust can be identified from the trust
instrument, and (4) a copy of the trust instrument has been
provided to the Employer."
4. Section 12 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following language
is hereby inserted in its place and stead:
"SECTION 12: Assignments and Transfers.
12.1. Consistent with Section 8 above, no one, including the Participant, his
beneficiary or designee, or any other person, shall have any right to
commute, sell, assign, transfer, or otherwise convey the right to receive
any payments hereunder, which payments and right thereto are expressly
declared to be non-assignable and non-transferable. The Employer shall
have no liability to either the Participant or a purported assignee or
transferee, on account of any attempted assignment or transfer. In
addition, except to the extent otherwise provided by law, no interest of the
Participant in the Plan shall be subject to attachment, garnishment or
execution, or be transferrable by operation of law, whether due to
bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation for the benefit of creditors, or any other
cause .
2000-00019
14831_ 1 6
.f
)
12.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the amounts deferred by a former
Participant may be transferred to another Internal Revenue Code section
457 eligible deferred compensation plan of which the former Participant
has become a participant, if the following conditions are met:
(1) the plan to which the former Participant wishes to transfer
amounts deferred is located within the State of California;
(2) the plan receiving such amounts provides for the acceptance
of such amounts;
(3) the employer accepting the transfer funds gives written
notice of its agreement to accept such transfer and assumes
liability therefor; and
(4) the Participant provides a written release to the Employer
releasing the Employer from any claim or liability under the
Plan after the date such transfer of funds occurs.
If a Participant separates from service in order to accept employment with
another entity which permits the Participant to participate in a section 457
eligible deferred compensation plan, and if the four conditions enumerated
above are met, payout of benefits will not commence upon separation
from service, notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, and
amounts previously deferred will automatically be transferred to that other
entity's section 457 eligible deferred compensation plan, to be credited to
the Participant's account.
12.3 A Participant, who was formerly employed by another public agency
located within the State of California, may transfer, to the Plan, funds from
an Internal Revenue Code section 457 eligible deferred compensation
plan maintained by that former employer, if that eligible deferred
compensation plan permits transfers to other section 457 eligible deferred
compensation plans and if the Participant complies with all applicable
terms and conditions of the transferring plan in effectuating the transfer."
5. The Plan shall continue in full force and effect except as expressly amended
herein.
2000-00019
14831_1 7
:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-REDLINE
APPROVING AMENDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM
FOR ASSISTANT DEPARTMENT HEADS~,. .. JBOC®CWfillr'lE .Ass:12smAN"lPS
AND PROFESSIONAL AND SUPERVlSbRY .. EMPLOYEEs·· ·.· ····.·
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REVISIONS TO THE
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM FOR THE
ASSISTANT DEPARTMENT HEADS/ E:m.@B}f~ Ass11s:m~s AND PROFEssioNAL ·Jili·o ··'su'P:ERvisoRY
':E:'fJ{p£'dYE'ifs'' OF THE DISTRICTS AND REPEALING
RESOLUTION NO. 86-29
* * * * * * * * *
WHEREAS, in conjunction with the Districts' Deferred
Compensation Plan, the Districts, by Resolution No. 86-29,
adopted by the Boards of Directors on February 13, 1986, have
previously approved specified Districts contributions to the
individual deferred compensation accounts of certain employees;
and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 95-54, adopted by the Boards of
Directors on May 24, 1995, the Districts have reaffirmed the
amount of the Districts contributions to the individual deferred
compensation accounts of the Assistant Department Heads, and the
Professional and Supervisory employees of the Districts; and
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors desire to revise the
program of Districts contributions for such employees in order to
change the vesting period with respect to such Districts
contributions b::q::nq :.-: .... ....,,. ~~:
1
llB·rB~~e~i:g2::~ii,B:~;~g;f.'.'~·ff:P:§,lfs9~:~i~~F.:~;pt;r~.:::,:;:2t•·· 9~J;t ai~.: E?C~.qµt;.iv~
~!!t!tli§&~iti!~~!~t~i~!.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,
DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the Districts hereby approve a contribution
of Districts funds, in an annual sum equal to a maximum of two
percent (2%) of the gross annual salary of the respective
Assistant Department Heads and an annual sum equal to a maximum
of one percent (1%) of the gross annual salary of the respective
(collectively, the •Districts Matching Funds Contribution(s)•),
to the respective individual deferred compensation accounts of
such employees, provided each such employee voluntarily withholds
from his/her salary, and contributes an equal sum, to his/her
individual deferred compensation account.
That the Districts hereby approve an additional contribution
(the •Districts Non-Matching Funds Contribution•) to the
respective individual deferred compensation accounts of the
Assistant Department Heads, in an annual sum equal to two and
one-half percent (2-1/2%) of the gross annual salary of each of
the respective Assistant Department Head employees described
herein, exclusive of the Districts Matching Funds Contribution
amount hereinabove described, without the requirement of any
matching contribution by the individual employees.
2000-00019
14605_1 2
That the Districts hereby approve an additional Districts
Non-Matching Funds Contribution, to the respective individual
deferred compensation accounts of the ~*'F.rc:µ~*v:i~(As$i=i?tan.ts ?::P:O.
Professional and Supervisory employees, in an annual sum equal to
two (2%) of the gross annual salary of the respective
Professional and Supervisory employees described herein,
exclusive of the Districts Matching Funds Contribution amount
hereinabove described, without the requirement of any matching
contribution by the individual employees.
That upon the completion of one year of employment with the
Districts and one year of participation in the Def erred
Compensation Plan, all Districts Matching Funds Contributions
then on deposit in the individual deferred compensation accounts
of the Assistant Department Heads~j[~\~i!~P.'i~#l!~i~~~'.~ff,§·~~§iti$!!}and
Professional and Supervisory employees shall be deemed vested,
and, thereafter, all Districts Matching Funds Contributions
deposited into such individual deferred compensation accounts
shall be deemed vested upon deposit. Notwithstanding the
preceding sentence, however, upon the death, or upon the Normal
or Late Retirement (as those terms are defined in the Def erred
Compensation Plan), of the employee, irrespective of the length
of his/her employment with the Districts and of his/her
participation in the Deferred Compensation Plan, all Districts
Matching Funds Contributions then on deposit in the individual
employee's deferred compensation account shall be deemed vested.
Once Districts Matching Funds Contributions have vested as
2000-00019
14605_1 3
de scribed in this paragr aph, t hey may thereafter be withdrawn t o
the extent otherwise permitted under the Deferr ed Compensation
Plan.
That Districts Non-Matching Funds Contributions shal l vest
and shall be subject to wi thdrawa l under the same conditions as
Districts Matching Funds Contributions , with two exceptions . (l )
an cffiPloyee who tcrffiinatcs service with the Districts for a
reason other than due to Hormal or Late Retirement or death shall
have no vested interest in, and shall not be entitled to
withdraw , any Districts Hon Matching Funds Contribut ions
deposited into the employee 's deferred compensation account
during the one year immediately preceding such termination of
service, and (2) in no event may an employee 'tv'ithdraw, in
connection with an emergency ·,;ithdrawal, a ny Districts Uon
Mat c hing Funds Contributions deposited into the employee's
def erred compensation account during the one year imme diately
preceding a reque"st for emergency withdrawal.
Section 2. This program shall be for the benefit of the
Assistant Department HeadJ.'::=':'.='$?feC8R:ffiV-~·.·~*M-~,~~~§B '.":=and Professional
and Supervisory employees, which classifications are set forth on
Attachment "1, 11 which is incorporated herein by reference, and
shall be terminated only by action of the Boards of Directors.
In the event other classifications are added to the category of
Assistant Department Heads) :Exe.o\lt:lv~ :::As$.::l.§:1~$1'J:~:$.1 or Professional
or Supervisory employees by action of the General Manager or
2000-00019
14605_1 4
Boards of Directors of Districts, said classes shall be deemed to
be governed by this Resolution concurrently therewith.
Section 3. The General Manager and the Director of Finance
are hereby authorized to execute individual Deferred Compensation
Participation Agreements with each eligible employee, and are
further authorized to execute any and all documents relating to
investment and payment transactions relating to the Def erred
Compensation Plan, provided that such documents are approved as
to form by the Districts' General Counsel.
Section 4. Resolution No. 86-29 is hereby repealed, and the
provisions herein shall become effective, upon adoption of this
Resolution; the provisions herein shall remain in effect until
amended or terminated by resolution of the Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held
2000-00019
14605_1 5
ATTACHMENT "1"
Executive Management
General Manager
Assistant General Manager Administration
Assistant General Manager Operations
Director of Finance
Director of Engineering
Director of Technical Services
Director of Operations
Director of Maintenance
Director of Human Resources
Director of Information Technology
Management
Financial Manager
Controller
Accounting Manager
Purchasing Manager
Secty. To The Board of Directors
Engineering Manager
Construction Manager
Lab Manager
Source Control Manager
Chief Operator
Maintenance Manager
Personnel Supervisor
Sr. Personnel Analyst
Safety & Erner. Resp. Manager
Senior Regulatory Specialist
Environmental Management Manager
Chief Scientist
Training Manager
Operations Manager
Human Resources Assistant
Executive Assistant II
Executive Assistant I
PAGE 2 -ATTACHMENT "1"
Professional
Senior Accountant
Accountant
Principal Information Services Tech.
Information Services Analyst
Programmer Analyst
Programmer
Sr. Buyer
Buyer
Principal Administrative Assistant
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Engineer
Associate Engineer Ill
Associate Engineer 11
Associate Engineer I
Principal Engineer Associate
Principal Env. Specialist
Project Specialist
Principal Lab & Res. Analyst
Scientist
Personnel Analyst
Safety & Erner. Resp. Sepec
Regulatory Specialist
Contract Administrator
Safety Representative
Senior Financial Analyst
Financial Analyst
Analyst
Senior Maintenance Planner
Planner
PAGE 3 -ATTACHMENT "1"
Supervisory
Principal Accountant
Information Services Specialist
Software Specialist
Supervising Buyer
Warehouse Supervisor
Engineering Supervisor
Senior Engineer
Chief Const. Inspector
Supv. Constr. Inspector
Compliance Supervisor
Lab Supervisor
Senior Scientist
Source Control Superv.
Supv. Source Ctrl. lnsp.
Sr. Operations Supv.
Operations Supervisor
Training Supervisor
Field Supervisor
Foreman
Security Supervisor
Environmental Management Supvr.
Safety Supervisor
Principal Financial Analyst
J:\WPDOC\FIN\CRANE\FPC.MTG\FPC95\DEFCOM.GPS
FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN
RESOURCES COMMITTEE
AGENDA FOR
JULY 12, 1995
FAHR95-33: Consideration of Orange County Employees Association
(OCEA) Grievance Concerning Side Letter Agreement
Summarv:
On October 28, 1994, the Orange County Employees Association submitted a
grievance on behalf of the Administrative and Clerical, Engineering and Technical
Services bargaining units alleging that the Districts were in violation of a Side Letter
entered into on March 21, 1994.
The alleged violations concerns the following Wage Article negotiated by the
Professional and Supervisory Groups subsequent to the Side Letter agreement:
•A Management Performance Review Plan Merit Pool will be funded in an amount equivalent to
3.8 percent of the payroll of employees in this group effective July 9, 1993, and 3.0 percent of the
payroll of employees in this group effective July 6, 1995, and July 4, 1996. The MPRP Merit Pool
shall be distributed in its entirety in accordance with provisions of the MPRP. Salary ranges will
also be adjusted 3.0 percent effective July 6, 1995, and July 4, 1996, as shown on Exhibit A.
There is no Merit Pool established for July 1994.•
The OCEA grievance contends that the 3.8 percent represents an increase in salary for
employees in the Professional and Supervisory Groups during the period November 26,
1993 through November 23, 1996, and should therefore be granted to the OCEA units.
The creation of the MPRP Merit Pool fund in an amount equivalent to 3.8 percent of
payroll represents the third year increase of a three-year agreement which was deferred
by the Boards of Directors for consideration until 1994.
TABLE 1. Six Year History of Salary lncraaau
OCEA AND OPERA TING ENGINEERS
Eff. Date Nov. '90 Nov. '91 Nov. '92 Nov. '93 Nov. '94 Nov. '95 TOTAL AV
Inc.% 5.0 5.5 5.5 -0-3.0 3.0 22.0 3.67
PROFESSIONAL AND SUPERVISORY
Eff. Date Jul. '91 Jul. '92 Jul. '93 Jul. '94 Jul. '95 Jul. '96 TOTAL AV
Inc.% 6.2 6.0 3.8 -0-3.0 3.0 22.0 3.67
J:IWPOOCIFINICRANE\FPC.MTGIFPC95\ITEMS.AGD\FAHR95.33
Staff Recommendation
The total increase negotiated by OCEA and the Professional and Supervisory Groups is
the same (22 percent) over the period in question. For these reasons, staff would
recommend that the grievance be denied on the basis that no group of employees did in
fact receive a general increase in salary during the period of November 26, 1993,
through November 23, 1996, higher than the negotiated increase received by the OCEA
unit.
-2-
J:\WPOOCIFIMCRANE\FPC.MTGIFPC95VTEMS.AGO\FAHR95.33
~, /-------.
------------------------...; .----,.. .. """JOHN H. SAWYER, GENERAL MANAGER C:
ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
JOHN H. SAWYER BUILDING
830 N. ROSS ST., SANTA ANA, CA 92701
(714) 835·3355
April 12, 1995
FAX (714) 543-6424
Secretary of the Boards of Directors
County Sar:iita~ion Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Ref: OCEA Grievance Appeal -Step 5
Dear Sir:
Pursuant to the OCEA represented units Memorandum of Understandings
(Districts Administrative and Clerical Employees, Technical Services, Engineering
units) Article II (Grievance Procedure) Step 5, OCEA is appealing this grievance to
the Districts Board of Directors.
The Districts has refused to implement the side letter to the Memorandum of
Understanding, dated March 21, 1994.
OCEA's resolution to this grievance is all employees in the
Administrative/Clerical, Engineering and Technical Services units to be made
whole from November 26, 1993 through November 24, 1994, per the side letter to
the Memorandum of Understanding.
Please contact me at 835-3355, to arrange a mutually convenient time to schedule
a grievance meeting.
Sincerely,
Orange County Employees Association
a~~alfk/Jry~
· RiChard A. Brown
Employee Relations Administration
_______ ___..A HALF CENTURY OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES...__ ______ _
ATTACHMENT 1
SIDE LETTER TO THE MEMORANDUM OF
UNDE.RSTANDING
BETWEEN THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
AND
THE ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND CLERICAL
EMPLOYEE UNIT
The Districts and OCEA agree that if any group of employees receives
a general increase in salaries and/or benefits during the period of
November 26, 1993 through November 23, 1996, which is higher
than the negotiated increase received by the OCEA unit, the Districts
shall grant the increase in salaries and/or benefits to the OCEA unit.
Signed at Fountain Valley, California this 21 u day ofMarch, 1994.
°'s~ a~~
Richard Brown
Director of Personnel OCEA-Chief Negotiator
September 8, 1993
MEMORANDUM
TO :
ATTACHMENT 2
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
P.O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
(714) 962-2411
As we enter the third consecutive year of declining economic
conditions in Orange County, the State and throughout the nation,
it becomes increasingly difficult to represent the best interests
of the communities and residents that we serve, and at the same
time address many of the issues of interest to our employees.
Programs, services and trends that have become an integral part
of our existence must be revisited because of an erosion of the
tax base and funding sources, and the general state of the
economy.
As I believe you know, last year the Governor and State
Legislature took away $3.5 million of our Districts' annual
property tax revenues and shifted them to fund their obligation
for financing schools. That amount continues to be diverted
yearly, and the State is continuing in their attempt to
confiscate even more taxes historically belonging to the
Districts. In fact, three times in the last month, and as
recently as September 3rd, the State Legislature considered a
proposal to take additional property tax monies from all
enterprise special districts, including ours.
Prudent, frugal and now austere fiscal constraints have become
the norm as our resources have continued to diminish. Many of the
Districts' member agencies have found it necessary to layoff
staff for the second year in a row. Many have frozen employee
salaries and benefits and even had to cut them back . The
Districts are more fortunate, however, as management practices
have been carried out in recent years with foresight such that
even though the Boards have been forced to cut the budget by
$44.5 million, staff or major employee or wastewater program
reductions have not been required this year as they have been in
other agencies .
More than ever, each of us, staff and Board members, must rise to
the challenge of managing resources that are shrinking. State and
local government now face an uncertain fiscal situation at best,
and there is no indication that it will improve in the
foreseeable future with employers leaving California and our
jobless rate languishing 34% above the national average. However,
September 8, 1993
Page 2
we believe that with continued prudent management, we will be
able to avoid the types of cutbacks that other agencies have
faced. Fortunately, over the years we have been able to
accumulate a very good total compensation package for you that
compares favorably in the marketplace. Unfortunately, given all
of the aforementioned considerations and the mandate of judicious
resource management, I must regretfully inform you that at this
time, the Boards have determined that the Districts must forego
establishing a salary merit pool fund for July 1993 MPRP
adjustments. This has been an extremely difficult decision for
the Directors, one that we did not take lightly. But we trust
that you and your Management, Supervisory and Professional
colleagues will understand the extenuating circumstances.
We all look forward to an improved economy, when our spending
resources are increasing instead of decreasing, and the overall
economic health and stability of our community and nation offers
a more optimistic future. Our actions today to restore that
balance will have a major impact on the swiftness of achieving
full recovery.
You and your co-workers play a major role in the Districts'
efforts to manage our resources in an optimum manner through your
personal contribution to your departments' and the Districts'
mission and success. Our record certainly speaks for itself. On
behalf of every Board Member, I commend you for your achievements
thus far and look forward to your ongoing contribution.
In closing I would like to leave you with a bit of good news. One
of the considerations the Boards had to struggle with was whether
to implement the 1993 adjustment in the salary ranges for MPRP
positions. I am pleased to inform you that the salary ranges were
changed, and the range for your position of
increased to per month. Clearly, this will
provide opportunities for the future as we all look forward to
economic and local government recovery.
Once again, thank you for your continued individual efforts and
achievements. They have not gone unnoticed or unappreciated.
Sincerely,
rtJ!
William D. Mahoney
Joint Chairman
FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN
RESOURCES COMMITTEE
AGENDA FOR
JULY 12, 1995
(13) Consideration of upcoming meetings and items to be discussed at
those meeting.
Summary
The calendar of future meetings is on the back of the Notice of Meeting each month.
The next Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting is
scheduled for Wednesday, September 13, 1995.
Some of the potential major non-routine items the Committee will be reviewing,
considering and acting on over the next few months follow. Some items will carry
forward to future months, but are listed only once at the start of a process.
MONTH ITEM
AUGUST As there is no Executive Committee meeting scheduled in August, the Committee is
likewise not scheduled.
SEPTEMBER Fourth Quarter Training & Travel Report
Employee Handbook
Financial Information System
OCTOBER Independent Financial Audit for 1994-95
1994-95 Management Letter
NOVEMBER As there is no Executive Committee meeting scheduled in November, the
Committee is likewise not scheduled.
Staff Recommendation
Information only item.
J:\WPOOC\FINICRANE\FPC.MTGIFPC85VTEMS.AGOV.GDITM12.795