The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About94.PPP 040115 Ops SP-173 Effluent Reuse Study Project No. SP-173 Kathy Millea Operations Committee April 1, 2015 TODAY'S PRESENTATION • Strategic Plan for Future Water Recycling • History of OCSD/OCWD Partnership • Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) • Near Term Goals — GWRS Final Expansion • Long Term Goals — Full Effluent Reuse 2013 Strategic Plan On November 20, 2013, the Board approved the Five-year Strategic Plan which included the strategic goal for "Future Water Recycling". General Manager Work Plan "Work with OCWD to jointly study improvements needed to support GWRS Final Expansion . Determine partnerships, needs, strategies, benefits and costs associated with recycling any remainder flows from Plant No. 2 effluent water." 01 IN'. Fir! fp'�; A;F4 '•� A- 1XIl 'Fat Uktv_ vp 1 0 in" _RLAN -1 ff I u ein t-Plant E t�:�� r to GWRS ivi i� I tt;- Al A_ '16 4; d U'r X'Y' v C4 Ag ov Aw'A? ��Ztl Aw.,-it Plant 2 Effluent MW ��;V_C VIA Y to Ocean through pp PLANT 2 § " .44 7,4 Outfall Syste 1.01 T 1 t1 AN11T,T — N 30-Year Partnership 9olC �? Ground Water Water Factory 21 Green Acres > Replenishment tMB iNE Ep`P SINE 193] Plant No. 1 effluent Plant No. 1 effluent Purify 100 MGD of Plant used to help create a used to create non- No. 1 reclaimed water to seawater intrusion potable water source produce 70 MGD of near barrier (7.5 MGD) used for distilled water landscape irrigation Initial expansion (2015) Users include Mile will purify 130 MGD to Square Park, Costa produce 100 MGD of Mesa Golf Course, and drinking water Home Ranch bean field Final Expansion will purify 173 MGD to produce 130 MGD of drinking water Orange CountyWater District OCWD LA San Bernardino IlAutan. a County y�� :�• Formed in 1933, supplies 's-``�TON Los Angeles PLACENnA t,,.,c;:_.• •fit water for northern and County OgA Riverside ��' � LA County central Orange County ALMA NAHEIM C VPRE� , VILLA "�'• 1 -PARk r LOS STANTON 1��1 t1�/ ^fir r A AlLITOS ORANGE ��•` �• --�',i��_r Responsible for managing SEAL WESTMINSTER f t �� y ^ BEACH I- 3 �•�.. .yam./ and protecting the Orange SANA" •�•• FOUNTAIN TUSTIN County Groundwater VALLEY R'�`v+ orange HUNTIN H } •., BEAG__H �• County Basin, which provides LAKE `; COSTA IRVINE FOREST .` MESA water for more than 2.4 �",, '•` <x' RANCHO million people T SANTA "�•., vi'.' c,r7 .�"'�` LAGUNA MARGARITA •� [et�Hc i� ��• -WOODS MISSION V �► l VIEJO I' LAGUNA ALISO MILLS VIEJO Yl Encom asses 229,000 -t LAGUNA A ,-\BEACH �•/ LAGUNA acres (N350 sq. mi) in the ° Fq NIGUEL JLI"N owe r watershed of the Unincorporated County ti CAPISTRANO DAN A Santa Ana River (SAR) OCWDBoundari %°"T_ _ San Diego County Boundaries SAN\EMENTE County N W 0 2 5 5 Miles Where does OCWD get its water? Imported Water Groundwater ~ 28% ~ 72% Colorado River Northern California Local Rainfall Santa Ana River Metropolitan Water District GWRS (MWD) of Southern California Municipal Water District OCWD of Orange County (MWDOC) Groundwater Basin 01 Retailers 4000r, 1 Large retail agenciesCity • of ' . City of Water Supply for the OC Groundwater Basin (FY13-14) Incidental 9% Santa Ana River Base Flow 28% GWRS 29% Storm Flow 11% Imported Water 23% What Is The Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) ? 70-MGD advanced water purification facility J II Takes treated sewer water that otherwise would be discharged to the ocean and purifies it to near-distilled • quality Provides a new 72,000 acre-feet per year source of water, which is enough water for nearly 600,000 people Operational since January 2008i GWRS Process :I1:: Aldb kaimAMM Ughq QUWD GWRS Water Exceeds State and Federal Drinking Water Standards " r lima an t �?10 C L IIL- Kraemer Basin GWRS Steering Committee OCSD OCWD VOON`v SAWTq TT 4 • ¢ 9 Lai O� LNG THE SINCE 1933 3 Members 3 Members VicfelLalir Beamish, Nielsen, Ferryman Yoh, Anthony, Green 3 Alternates 3 Alternates Kring, Sebourn, Jones Bilodeau, Flory, Nguyen GWRS Independent AdvisoryPanel Appointed by National Water Research Institute Leading experts in public health and environmental protection Review operations, monitoring and Groundwater Replenishment Systerr, water quality - ap�,° wY Makes recommendations to OCWD and regulatory agencies to assure a quality and reliability GWRS Flow Plan ...u. _� Wrt -woo 70 MGD -----� 30 MGD==*30 MGD -' TOOMAK 'D ---�--- ---�---, :nor.. GWRS Initial Final Expansion Expansion; 2008 2015 ? -------- --------- t t 4 93 MGD 40 MGD 40 MGD GWRS Flow Plan 70 MGD -----� 30 MGD==*30 MGD -' 130 MGD GWRS Initial Final Expansion Expansion; 2008 2015 ? -------- --------- t t 4 93 MGD 40 MGD 40 MGD 173 MGD Decreasing Flows Coming to OCSD Orange County Sanitation District Plant No. 1 & Plant No. 2 Combined Influent Flow July 1994 - January 2015 290 Population 280 270 260 250 240 0 230 Current Flow 220 185 MGD 210 200 190 180 ,7 M � C-0 M CD M I- � O � 00 O O N M O CDO CD CD CD CD CDO CDO _ Non- Reclaimable Flows Non-Reclaimable Flows � 41 MGD — SARI (34 MGD total - 11 MGD-inland counties and 23 MGD-OC domestic) — Centrate (_ 5 MGD) — DAFT Underflow (_ 1.5 MGD) — OCWD Cleaning Waste 0.5 MGD) FLOW SUMMARY OCSD Influent 185 MGD Non-Reclaimable (SARI) -34 MGD Non-Reclaimable (Other) -7 MGD Available Flow 144 MGD Neuuud for GWRS 113 MGD Deficit 29 MGD Flow Equalization Projected OCSD Flow and GWRS Feed 180.00 160.00 140.00 Surplus 120.00 Deficit 0100.00 80.00 60.00 40.00 20.00 0.00 00 00 00 00 " 00 0 00 00 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Hour OCSD Available Flow 130 MGD GWRS Feed Flow Equalization Tanks for GWRS Initial Expansion K � Oki �. � - � .�■�tea - �` � 1I I Y+ i f►• y ._y AL "tile' J�T] ti Goals of Study Develop GWRS Final Expansion Implementation Plan Identify future water recycling I opportunities beyond GWRS Pursue grant opportunities G W R S • OWUWWOAI UPUNISKWNT SK1lM Tastes like water.. because it is water! General Manager's Recommendations Approve a budget increase of $450,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $3,250,000; Approve a Professional Services Agreement with CDM Smith, Inc., to provide Engineering Services for Effluent Reuse Study, Project SP-173, for an amount not to exceed $2,008,510 Approve a contingency of $200,850 ( 10%); and, Authorize staff to negotiate a cost-sharing agreement with the Orange County Water District for future Board approval . Orange County Sanitation District We're here for you. Orange County Sanitation District We're here for you. Orange County Sanitation District We're here for you. Final Expansion Challenges - Decreasing Flows Coming to OCSD - Non-Reclaimable Flows, including SARI - Plant 2 Pump Station and Conveyance - Flow Equalization - Permit and Environmental Impacts Study Deliverables GWRS Final Expansion Implementation Plan - Non-Reclaimable Flows Process Treatment Concept Designs - Plant No. 2 GWRS Pump Station Concept Designs - Flow Equalization Concept Designs - Permit and Environmental Impacts - Plant No. 2 Secondary Water Quality Report - Hydraulic Model for Both Treatment Plants - Optimize Collections Diversions to Maximize Reuse - Additional Urban Runoff Opportunities - Future Studies - Schedule and Costs P2 Pump Station and Conveyance `- Potential GWRS Pump Station ' Locations �� Re ♦♦ �� J j � ��L� III �R -_ � ♦♦ \ �� ` �� 1! vim\ MII � h`Cr ♦ - � / i ZO "u Existing 66-inch Interplant O(i�3OUOF-- Pro osed new pipe to GWRS Proposed new pipe to GWRS Environmental & OCSD Permit Impacts Recommend environmental studies that OCSD should perform Whole Effluent Toxicity - - --- '� Testing _ Identify NPDES permit impacts _`�. Santa Ana Rover Intercep tor (SARI ) T pl ho C Sa 0 — � .......... pland WCa /@I, 4 . V, Fontana Sen al,"d ..'n,El UBaleplandtr �— I,I a--*— B A'a Rh I., CU Fontana If Rose Welt .—Zl M.M. Co,,na S.—$a,Gabnel spurnEI ontano BI—n AV 'o lah.d. Porn" a nal� R.dards .a Snt,t L. -a- '' ty 111 T gales pdGr,Ia,d Mon Oebello 0 s La Poem"' South San T-- r ,,,_,, d CIM.. suny,l'p, -d.' D-r- , Glen 1I,,h1 oo,. Rubdoux R ell Revere 1,11,d z, d- H.,h — L J-,W. R—lud Ll Val —ney 1— R, id. Mrrad Norwalk a ,ValleyL.M.,.d Y.rba M., en P,L,,Ida Unda acent,a EParFulFullerton —10— Fullerton Garden mon Wood , 'r, — C -..d Pal— Ha—ran Cr30�,'411 A-h Pull al al or e N Rrv..ide Nu Garden rang e Inf-is Grove Par.. North So G An. Tusnn R I.d Z_ Hanel '. —I P.. 12, P.0— "Jo Huntil9ton Fwn n 9—M S. Clay 7 "1 Irvine 7 aft., HuntingtonFop pm Beach C.- RaRanchT,.—Y. Re 0 ke a l' or, D,* M.,,an I, ;T on Forest I d, or ' I? ,- SARI Total Flow: 35 MGD Orange County Domestic Flows: 23 MGD • [Weld dV o '�� . Y • awl uoisJan]p Effluent Reuse Study h I Sc e u e Start Study May 2015 Draft Implementation Plan May 2016 Final Implementation Plan August 2016 Effluent Reuse Study Schedule and Budget NTP Issued May 2015 Draft Implementation Plan May 2016 Final Implementation Plan August 2016 Consultant Fee $2,015,000 OCSD Staff $700,000 Contingency $600,000 M- OWWMW- Orange • • District Orange County Sanitation District We're here for you. •� G W R S GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM �A G W R S GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM Tastes like water... because it is water! A Joint effort of the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District Benefits of GWRS Creates a new local water supply i�, Reuses a wasted resource R Expands the seawater barrier R Increases water supply reliability G W R S •, GMOUNDW�IEE REElEN15HMEN7 SYSTEM Offsets imported water cutbacks Tastes likewater. Costs less than imported water because it is water! Saves half the energy over imported water Improves quality of water in the basin �- GWRS Project Funding J. G w R s GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM $481 Million Capital Cost 72,000 acre-feet per year capacity OCSD OCWD, Contribution, $196,000,000 $196,000,000 State Grants, Federal Grant, $69,000,000 $20,000,000 GWRS permitting of Public Health (CDPH) California Department W Water (DD ) Division of Drinking 4 CDPH 2003 Public Hearing t and Conditions — CDPH Findings of Fac d b Recharge Reuse Regulations Guide y Control Board (RWQCB) Regional Water Quality Control Incorporate CDPH Findings into p ater Boards 2004 RWQCB hearing Requirements - - - Producer/User Water Recycling — Issued 2014 • DDW moved from CDPH to SWRCB in July Strong Community Support Proactive face-to-face outreach with more than 1 ,200 presentations, 700 tours and many news stories that resulted in: G W R TE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM -No active opposition and support from: • 100% support from cities in OCWD service area • 100% support from OC state and federal elected officials ' • 100% support from Chambers of Commerce & OCBC • Many businesses including Edison and Sempra Energy • All major environmental groups • Several health experts, medical doctors, hospitals, pharmacists and scientists • Several key minority leaders • Educational, religious, police and fire leaders • More than 200 community groups like Kiwanis, Rotary, etc. • OC Tax, AARP, OC Farm Bureau and others Orange County Sanitation1 for you. OC Groundwater Basin r)rinkin9 'V\laiter VVells r�JfJ rJJJ J rJJI 'J,JJJ' NON-WATERBEARING 3,JJJ' FORMATION r Orange County Sanitation1 for you. Seawater In rusion . G W R S RO NDWATER REPLENI HMENT V TE Desired Seawater • • • Holding Point • T a# Prt Current Extent of Seawaterintrusionr Orange County Sanitation District We're here for you. Need for More Water LET"SDO OUR PAR _-__�.__� _ - - - 0 RAVEWAHR-1 Save Our WATER OWNS 1 � � {� I,