HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-24-2020 Board Item 9 - 2018-19 Annual Pretreatment Program Report s
I' e
r'
IR
2018- 19
O�NjV SANITgr�oY
nnua ep
I �
Ipt
¢ 9
o �
RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION
9oT�cT�NG THE ENV\e'o���?
CountyOrange
POTW PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
NPDES Permit Holder: Orange County Sanitation District
Report Due Date: October 31, 2019
Period Covered by this Report: July 2018 through June 2019
Period Covered by Previous Report: July 2017 through June 2018*
Name of Wastewater Treatment Plant(s): Reclamation Plant No. 1, and Treatment
Plant No. 2
NPDES Permit Number: CA0110604
Person to contact concerning information contained in this report:
• Name: Roya Sohanaki
• Title: Engineering Manager, Resource Protection Division
• Mailing Address: 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018
• Telephone: (714) 593-7437
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible forgathering the information,
the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief true, accurate, and complete l
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility
of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations."
October 31, 2019 4 '
Date Engineering Manager, Resource Protection Division
See Annual Report 2017-18,Orange County Sanitation District,submitted to EPA Region 9 and California Regional Water Quality
Control Board,Santa Ana Region.
Serving: Orange County Sanitation District
Anaheim 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,CA 92708
714.962.2411 • www.ocsd.com
Brea October 31, 2019
Buena Park Hope A. Smythe, Executive Officer
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
Cypress Santa Ana Region
3737 Main Street, Suite 500
Fountain Valley Riverside, CA 92501-3339
Fullerton Subject: Board Order No. R8-2012-0035, NPDES No. CA0110604
Garden Grove FY 2018/19 Pretreatment Program Annual Report
Huntington Beach In accordance with the requirements of NPDES Permit No. CA0110604, attached please find
Irvine the FY 2018/19 Pretreatment Program Annual Report which provides information on the
Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) pretreatment program for the period July 1, 2018
La Habra through June 30, 2019.
La Palma The attached annual report provides an update on the status of OCSD's pretreatment program
in achieving its requirements and objectives. Information is also provided on how the program
Los Alamitos is administered, the resources used to manage the program, the compliance status of
industrial users, and the impact of source control efforts on wastewater and biosolids quality.
Newport Beach
Some of the program's highlights for this fiscal year are summarized below:
Orange
' The program has continued to effectively reduce heavy metals discharges. Since
Placentia 1976/77, the total mass of heavy metals entering OCSD's system has decreased by
86% while the mass of metals discharged to the marine environment has decreased
Santa Ana by 99%. The influent heavy metals to OCSD's treatment plants meet our NPDES
Seal Beach effluent standards before wastewater treatment has occurred.
Stanton During FY 2018/19, 1,362 inspections of industrial facilities were conducted, and
3,235 samples were collected for analysis. In addition to warning notices and self-
Tustin monitoring notices, 221 separate enforcement actions were taken against
noncompliant industries in FY 2018/19, including compliance meetings and
Villa Park inspections, and the issuance of fees, penalties, enforcement orders and
administrative complaint settlements. Over$117,128 in noncompliance fees and
County of Orange penalties were issued.
Costa Mesa During FY 2018/19, OCSD continued its oversight of IRWD's and SAWPA's pre-
Sanitary District treatment programs. Information on IRWD and SAWPA can be found in Chapter 7
Midway City and Appendices G and H of this report.
Sanitary District
Should you have any questions regarding the information provided in the report, or wish to meet
Irvine Ranch with OCSD staff to discuss the report in more detail, please contact me at your convenience at
Water District (714) 593-7437.
Yorba Linda ,
Water District
Roya Sohanaki, PE
Engineering Manager, Resource Protection Division
I HTG:Iam
c: EPA Region 9, CWA Compliance Office
SWRCB Pretreatment Program Manager
Submitted electronically to ciwgs.waterboards.ca.gov,
R9pretreatment@epa.gov, and NPDES_Wastewater@waterboards.ca.gov
Our Mission: To protect public health and the environment by
providing effective wastewater collection, treatment, and recycling.
Serving. Orange County Sanitation District
Anaheim 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,CA 92708
714.962.2411 • www.ocsd.com
Hrea
Buena Park
c,y;xe'S October 31, 2019
Fountain Valley
Hope A. Smythe, Executive Officer
Fullerton California Regional Water Quality Control Board
Santa Ana Region
Garden Grove 3737 Main Street, Suite 500
Riverside, CA 92501-3339
Huntington Beach
Subject: Board Order No. R8-2012-0035, NPDES No. CA0110604
Irvine Pretreatment Program Semi-Annual Report for the Period of January 1
La Habra through June 30, 2019
La Palma
As authorized by NPDES Permit No. CA0110604, the Pretreatment Program Semi-Annual
Los Alamitos Report information for January 1 through June 30, 2019 has been submitted as part of the
Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) pretreatment program for the period July 1, 2018
Newport Beach through June 30, 2019. Enforcement action and compliance status information has been
divided into appropriate six-month summaries.
Orange
Placentia Should you have any questions regarding the information provided in the report, or wish to
meet with OCSD staff to discuss the report in more detail, please contact me at your
Santa Ana convenience at(714) 593-7437.
Seal Beach
Stanton ��,•-�
Tustin 4 '
Villa Park Roya Sohanaki, PE
Engineering Manager, Resource Protection Division
County of Orange
HTG:Iam
Costa Mesa c: EPA Region 9, CWA Compliance Office
Sanitary District SWRCB Pretreatment Program Manager
Submitted electronically to ciwgs.waterboards.ca.gov,
Midway City R9pretreatment@epa.gov,and NPDES_Wastewater@waterboards.ca.gov
Sanitary District
Irvine Ranch
Water District
Yorba Linda
Water District
Our Mission: To protect public health and the environment by
providing effective wastewater collection, treatment, and recycling.
ANNUAL REPORT 2019
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018
(714) 962-2411
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM
Letter of Transmittal
Certification
Table of Contents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiv
List of Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xvii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
E.1 BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E.1
E.2 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E.1
E.2.1 Pretreatment Program Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E.2
E.2.2 Pretreatment Program Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E.3
E.2.3 Compliance with NPDES Discharge Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EA
chapter 1
NPDES REQUIREMENTS - PRETREATMENT
1.1 PRETREATMENT REQUIREMENTS — COMPLIANCE
WITH NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION
SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1
chapter 2
OCSD FACILITIES AND COMPLIANCE WITH
DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS
2.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1
2.2 EXISTING OCSD FACILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2
2.2.1 Description of Treatment Plants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page
2.2.1.1 Reclamation Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2
2.2.1.2 Treatment Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3
2.2.1.3 Joint Works Facilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.5
2.3 COMPLIANCE WITH NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.5
2.4 EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.7
2.4.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.7
2.4.2 Suspended Solids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.7
2.4.3 Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD-C) . . . . . . . . . . . 2.7
2.4.4 Oil and Grease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.7
2.4.5 Settleable Solids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.8
2.4.6 Turbidity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.8
2.4.7 pH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.8
2.4.8 Toxicity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.8
2.5 FACILITIES SPECIAL PROJECTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.9
2.5.1 Plant No.1 and Plant No. 2 Thickening & Dewatering Centrifuge
Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.9
2.5.2 Plant No. 1 Trickling Filters Bleach Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.9
2.6 METALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.10
2.7 MASS EMISSION BENCHMARKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.10
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page
chapter 3
PERMITS
3.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1
3.2 PERMIT CLASSIFICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1
3.3 PERMIT ISSUANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2
3.3.1 Identification of New Permittees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3
3.4 DISCHARGE LIMITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3
3.4.1 Industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3
3.4.2 Wastehaulers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.4
3.5 ESTABLISHING MASS EMISSION RATES (MER) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.5
chapter 4
INSPECTION, SAMPLING, COMPLIANCE, & ENFORCEMENT
4.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1
4.2 ROUTINE SAMPLING AND INSPECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1
4.3 NON-ROUTINE SAMPLING AND INSPECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2
4.3.1 Downstream Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2
4.4 ORANGE COUNTY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
STRIKE FORCE AND JOINT AGENCY INSPECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.3
4.5 INDUSTRIAL COMPLIANCE STATUS WITH
DISCHARGE LIMITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.3
4.5.1 Industries in Significant Noncompliance (SNC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.3
4.6 ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page
4.6.1 Compliance Inspections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5
4.6.2 Compliance Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5
4.6.3 Compliance Requirement Letters...................................................... 4.5
4.6.4 Order to Cease/Terminate Non-Compliance/Discharge .................... 4.5
4.6.5 Notices of Violation — Noncompliance Fees, Penalties . . . . . . . . . . . 4.6
4.6.6 Probation Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.6
4.6.7 Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.6
4.6.8 Regulatory Compliance Schedule Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.7
4.6.9 Administrative Complaints, Penalties, and Settlement Agreements. . 4.7
4.6.10 Permit Suspensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.7
4.6.11 Permit Revocations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.7
4.6.12 Emergency Suspension Order . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.8
4.6.13 Civil/Criminal Complaints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.8
4.7 ENFORCEMENT SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.9
chapter 5
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STAFFING, COSTS, AND
FIELD EQUIPMENT
5.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1
5.2 STAFFING, REVENUES, AND COSTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1
5.2.1 Staffing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1
5.2.2 Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page
5.2.3 Program Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1
5.3 FIELD EQUIPMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.2
5.3.1 Equipment Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.2
chapter 6
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STATUS
6.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.1
6.2 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.1
6.3 WASTEHAULER PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.1
6.3.1 Wastehauler Permitting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.1
6.3.2 Wastehauler Discharges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.1
6.3.3 Wastehauler Monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.3
6.4 INSPECTION AND SAMPLING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.3
6.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY
CONTROL (QA/QC) ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.3
6.5.1 QA/QC Program Tasks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.3
6.5.2 QA/QC Sampling Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.5
6.5.3 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.7
6.6 TOTAL TOXIC ORGANICS WAIVER PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.8
6.7 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMIT PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.12
6.7.1 Metrics and Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.12
6.7.2 SPDP Program Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.13
6.7.3 SPDP Regulatory Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.13
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page
6.8 SELF-MONITORING PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.13
6.9 INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.13
6.10 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN OPERATING THE
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.14
chapter 7
INTERACTION WITH OTHER AGENCIES
7.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.1
7.2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 18 AND 19 FLOW
ACCOMODATION AGREEMENT ................................................................... 7.1
7.3 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT (IRWD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.1
7.3.1 IRWD Operating Permit, Regional Board Order 2015-0024 . . . . . . . . . . . 7.2
7.3.2 IRWD Analytical Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.2
7.3.3 Inorganic Pollutants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.3
7.3.4 Organic Pollutants.................................................................................... 7.5
7.3.5 Report of Upset, Pass-Through and
Interference Events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.6
7.3.6 Discussion of the List of Industrial Users . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.6
7.3.7 Discussion of Industrial User Compliance Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.9
7.3.8 Summary of SIU Compliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.9
7.3.9 Discussion of Significant Changes in the
Pretreatment Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.9
7.3.10 Pretreatment Program Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.9
7.3.11 Equipment Purchases for FY 2017/18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.10
7.3.12 Discussion of Public Participation Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.11
7.3.13 Discussion of Sludge Disposal Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.11
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page
7.3.14 IRWD Additional Information..................................................................... 7.11
7.4 SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY (SAWPA) ........................ 7.13
7.4.1 Brine Line System Pretreatment Program Overview................................. 7.14
7.4.2 SAWPA, Member Agency, and Contract Agency Pretreatment Programs 7.15
7.4.2.1 Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD)................................. 7.15
7.4.2.2 Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA)....................................... 7.15
7.4.2.3 Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD)............................. 7.17
7.4.2.4 San Bernardino Municipal Water Department (SBMWD).......... 7.18
7.4.2.5 San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (Valley)........... 7.19
7.4.2.6 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA).................... 7.20
7.4.2.6.1 SAWPA Waste Hauler Program ........................... 7.23
7.4.2.7 Western Municipal Water District (WMWD)............................... 7.26
7.4.2.8 Yucaipa Valley Water District (YVWD)...................................... 7.28
7.4.3 Self-Monitoring Program ................................................................... 7.29
7.4.4 Field Inspection, Sampling, and Monitoring QA/QC........................... 7.29
7.4.5 Identification of New Permittees........................................................ 7.29
7.4.6 Future Projects That Will Affect Quantity of Discharge
to the Brine Line ............................................................................... 7.32
7.4.7 SAWPA Special Projects................................................................... 7.32
7.4.8 SAWPA Member and Contract Agency Ordinances
and Resolutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.32
7.4.9 Public Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.33
7.4.10 Summary of Permittees in SNC Newspaper Notice . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.35
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page
7.4.11 Non-Industrial Source Control and Public Education Programs. . . . 7.35
7.4.12 Other Public Participation.................................................................. 7.36
7.4.13 Changes to the SAWPA Pretreatment Program................................ 7.37
7.4.14 Pretreatment Program Budget .......................................................... 7.39
7.4.15 Equipment Inventory Listing.............................................................. 7.40
7.4.16 SAWPA Pretreatment Program Training ........................................... 7.41
chapter 8
SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
8.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.1
8.2 BIOSOLIDS QUALITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.1
chapter 9
NON-INDUSTRIAL SOURCE CONTROL AND PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAMS
9.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.1
9.2 FATS, OILS, AND GREASE (FOG) CONTROL PROGRAMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.1
10.2.1 Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) Control............................................... 9.1
9.3 RADIATOR SHOPS ........................................................................................ 9.5
9.4 DRY CLEANERS ............................................................................................ 9.6
9.5 URBAN RUNOFF............................................................................................ 9.7
9.5.1 Dry Weather Diversion Systems and Urban Runoff Flow.................. 9.8
9.5.2 Proposed Urban Runoff Diversion Systems ...................................... 9.11
9.5.3 Dry Weather Urban Runoff Quality.................................................... 9.12
9.5.4 Urban Runoff Diversion Locations..................................................... 9.14
9.6 DENTAL AMALGAM ....................................................................................... 9.14
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
Page
9.7 PUBLIC EDUCATION...................................................................................... 9.14
9.7.1 Industrial Environmental Coalition Orange County ............................ 9.14
ix
LIST OF TABLES
Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
chapter 1
NPDES REQUIREMENTS — PRETREATMENT
chapter 2
OCSD'S FACILITIES AND COMPLIANCE WITH
DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS
Table 2.1 Average Daily Influent and Effluent Flow in Million
Gallons Per Day (MGD), Fiscal Years 1997-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2
Table 2.2 NPDES Permit Discharge Requirements and OCSD's
Annual Average Influent and Final Effluent Discharge
Values for Fiscal Year 2018-19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.6
Table 2.3 Suspended Solids and BOD-C Annual Average Daily
Influent and Final Effluent for Fiscal Years 2013-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.7
Table 2.4 Settleable Solids, Turbidity, and pH, Average Final
Effluent for Fiscal Years 2013-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.8
Table 2.5 Final Effluent Yearly Average Toxicity Values for
Fiscal Years 2014-2019. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.9
Table 2.6 Average Metal Concentrations and Mass in the Influent
and Effluent for Fiscal Years 2015-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.10
Table 2.7 Mass Emissions for All Benchmark Constituents,
Fiscal Year 2018-19. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.12
chapter 3
PERMITS
Table 3.1 OCSD's Maximum Allowable Discharge Limits in
Milligrams Per Liter (mg/L). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.4
x
LIST OF TABLES
(continued)
Page
Table 3.2 OCSD's Maximum Allowable Discharge Limits in
Milligrams Per Liter (mg/L) (Wastehaulers) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.4
chapter 4
INSPECTION, SAMPLING, COMPLIANCE, ENFORCEMENT
Table 4.1 Summary of Inspections, Sampling, and Laboratory
Analyses, Fiscal Years 2014-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2
Table 4.2 Summary of Companies in Significant Noncompliance
(SNC), Fiscal Year 2018-19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5
chapter 5
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STAFFING,
COSTS, AND FIELD EQUIPMENT
Table 5.1 Summary of Total Costs and Total Labor Hours for the
Pretreatment Program, Fiscal Years 2014-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.2
Table 5.2 Current Inventory of Major Equipment for the
Pretreatment Program for Fiscal Year 2018-19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.2
chapter 6
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STATUS
Table 6.1 Summary of Wastehauler Loads and Gallons Discharged into
Plant No. 1 Disposal Station, Fiscal Years 2014-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . 6.2
Table 6.2 Summary of Wastehauler Load Types Discharged into
Plant No. 1 Disposal Station, Fiscal Year 2018-19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.2
Table 6.3 Summary of Wastehauler Grease Wastewater Loads into
Plant No. 1 Disposal Station, Fiscal Years 2014-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . 6.3
Table 6.4 Equipment Blank Sampling Results, Fiscal Year 2018-19. . . . . . . . . 6.5
Table 6.5 QA/QC Evaluation of Archived Samples, Fiscal Year 2018-19 . . . . . 6.6
A
LIST OF TABLES
(continued)
Page
Table 6.6 QA/QC Collection Checks, Samples and Sampler Average
Deviations, Fiscal Year 2018-19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.7
Table 6.7 Permittees with TTOs Waivers, July 1, 2018 — June 30, 2019 . . . . . . 6.9
chapter 7
INTERACTION WITH OTHER AGENCIES
Table 7.1 Class I Industries Within Irvine Ranch Water District
Revenue Areas 7 and 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.6
Table 7.2 Summary of Irvine Ranch Water District
Pretreatment Program Costs, 2017-18 and 2018-19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.10
Table 7.3 Summary of Irvine Ranch Water District Pretreatment
Equipment, Fiscal Year 2018-19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.10
Table 7.4 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority— Summary of Pretreatment
Equipment for Fiscal Year 2018-19................................................... 7.40
chapter 8
SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Table 8.1 Trends in Trace Metal Content of Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 2010-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.1
chapter 9
NON-INDUSTRIAL SOURCE CONTROL AND PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAMS
Table 9.1 NISC Programs, Fiscal Year 2018-19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.1
Table 9.2 FSEs by Category, Fiscal Year 2018-19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.3
Table 9.3 FSE Monitoring Reports, Fiscal Year 18-19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.3
Table 9.4 FSE Compliance Inspection Activities, Fiscal Year 2018-19 . . . . . . . 9.4
Table 9.5 FOG Control Program Effectiveness, Fiscal Year 2018-19 . . . . . . . . 9.5
Table 9.6 Radiator Shops Program, Fiscal Year 2017-18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.6
xii
LIST OF TABLES
(continued)
Page
Table 9.7 Dry Cleaner Inventory, Fiscal Year 2018-19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.6
Table 9.8 Dry Cleaner Certification Activity, Fiscal Year 2018-19 . . . . . . . . . . . 9.7
Table 9.9 Dry Weather Urban Runoff Discharges
Fiscal Years 2013-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.9
Table 9.10 Average Urban Runoff Discharge Volume by Diversion,
Fiscal Year 2018-19 .......................................................................... 9.10
Table 9.11 Urban Runoff Program, Fiscal Year 2018-19..................................... 9.11
Table 9.12 Urban Runoff Compliance, Fiscal Year 2018-19................................ 9.13
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Figure E-S-1 Average Effluent Total Heavy Metals and Flow
for Past Fiscal Years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E.2
chapter 1
NPDES REQUIREMENTS — PRETREATMENT
chapter 2
OCSD'S FACILITIES AND COMPLIANCE WITH
DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS
Figure 2-1 Map of Orange County Sanitation District's
Service Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.5
chapter 3
PERMITS
chapter 4
INSPECTION, SAMPLING, ENFORCEMENT
chapter 5
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STAFFING,
COSTS, AND FIELD EQUIPMENT
chapter 6
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STATUS
chapter 7
INTERACTION WITH OTHER AGENCIES
Figure 7-1 Michelson Water Recycling Plant Effluent Total
Dissolved Solids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.3
xiv
LIST OF FIGURES
(continued)
Page
Figure 7-2 Michelson Water Recycling Plant Influent
and Effluent Heavy Metals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.4
Figure 7-3 Michelson Water Recycling Plant Influent
and Effluent Copper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.4
Figure 7-4 Michelson Water Recycling Plant Influent
and Effluent Zinc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.5
Figure 7-5 Michelson Water Recycling Plant Influent
and Effluent Total Toxic Organics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.5
Figure 7-6 Michelson Water Recycling Plant Influent Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.11
Figure 7-7 Michelson Water Recycling Plant Influent and Effluent Selenium . . . 7.12
chapter 8
SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Figure 8-1 Trends in Concentrations of Arsenic in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1994-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.6
Figure 8-2 Trends in Concentrations of Cadmium in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1994-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.6
Figure 8-3 Trends in Concentrations of Chromium in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1994-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.7
Figure 8-4 Trends in Concentrations of Copper in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1994-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.7
Figure 8-5 Trends in Concentrations of Lead in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1994-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.8
Figure 8-6 Trends in Concentrations of Mercury in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1994-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.8
Figure 8-7 Trends in Concentrations of Molybdenum in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1994-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.9
Figure 8-8 Trends in Concentrations of Nickel in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1994-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.9
Figure 8-9 Trends in Concentrations of Selenium in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1994-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.10
xv
LIST OF FIGURES
(continued)
Page
Figure 8-10 Trends in Concentrations of Zinc in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years1994-2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.10
chapter 9
NON-INDUSTRIAL SOURCE CONTROL AND PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAMS
xvi
LIST OF APPENDICES
appendix a
MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE STATUS REPORT
appendix b
SUMMARY OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS AND TRACE CONSTITUENTS
ANALYSES
appendix c
PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
appendix d
FEES/PENALTIES FOR NON-COMPLIANCES
appendix e
PUBLIC NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANTLY NON-COMPLIANT INDUSTRIES
appendix f
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
appendix g
IRWD SAMPLING
appendix h
SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY (SAWPA) REPORTS, DATA
AND SNC NOTICE
appendix i
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS
appendix j
PERMITTEES WITH PRETREATMENT EQUIPMENT
xvii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Background
Introduction
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
E.1 BACKGROUND
Recognizing the need to control the quality and quantity of wastewaters discharged to the
sewerage system, in February 1954, OCSD's Board of Directors adopted the first Ordinance
regulating the use of the sewerage system. This Ordinance was subsequently revised and
amended in February 1958, April 1970, July 1976, July 1983, September 1989, February 1992,
July 1998, July 2008, and October 2009. The 1970 revision formally established OCSD's
Industrial Waste Division to issue permits, set flow and quality limits, and monitor and inspect
industrial discharges to the sewerage system. Substances monitored and regulated included: oil
and grease of mineral and petroleum origin, organic materials, dissolved solids, suspended
solids, phenolic compounds, radioactive wastes, combustible materials, and any other
contaminants that had the potential to degrade wastewater treatment processes or cause
problems in the sewerage facilities. In July 1976, the Ordinance was revised to include heavy
metal limits.
In July 1983, the Ordinance was further amended to include enforcement of the EPA's Federal
categorical limits and to modify OCSD's local discharge limits for cadmium, copper,
polychlorinated biphenyls, pesticides, and total toxic organics. OCSD's pretreatment program
was approved by the EPA in January 1984. In September 1989, the Ordinance was revised to
streamline administrative and enforcement procedures, incorporate EPA regulations adopted
since 1983, clarify the intent of the program through added definitions and procedures, and
include special purpose discharge permit requirements and conditions. In February 1992, the
Ordinance was amended to revise defined terms, initiate noncompliance sampling fees, and
include language giving OCSD authority to levy administrative penalties according to changes to
state law enacted in January 1992. In July 1998, revisions were made primarily for the deletion of
Class III permits, which were issued for the collection of user charges for the discharge of
domestic waste. In July 2008, revisions were made regarding the application of tax credits for
user charges, and to include dry weather urban runoff permit requirements and conditions. In
October 2009, the Ordinance was revised to provide clarification regarding transfer of permit
ownership. The most recent revision was adopted in February 2016, and became effective in
July 2016, updating the local limits among other sections of the Ordinance.
E.2 INTRODUCTION
The fiscal year(FY) 2018/19 OCSD Annual Report provides the following:
• Information about the industrial pretreatment program as required by OCSD's National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region (CRWQCB) and the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); and
• Information on how OCSD's pretreatment program is administered; industrial permittees'
compliance status; discharger's effect on OCSD's influent, effluent, and biosolids; the
labor, equipment, and capital resources used for the program during the fiscal year; and
other documentation.
E.1
2500 500
—Total Effluent Heavy Metals — — Influent Flow
2000 400
b M
S 1500 300 G
D
a � _
1000 200
500 100
0 0
77 80 82 85 88 91 94 97 00 03 06 09 12 15 18
Figure ES-1 Average Effluent Total Heavy Metals and Flows for Past Fiscal Years
Orange County Sanitation District
E.2.1 Pretreatment Program Summary
Control of Pollutants
Since FY 1976/77, while Orange County's population has grown, the pretreatment program has
been successful in reducing the average daily pounds of metals entering OCSD's system by 86%
and metals discharged to the marine environment by 99%. Over this time, individual effluent
metals including cadmium, chromium, copper, silver, and lead have been reduced by over 99%;
nickel by 96%; and zinc by 97%. Long-term trends of effluent heavy metals show a steady
decline since FY 1977 (see Figure ES-1).
OCSD's pretreatment program has been effective in reducing the toxic priority pollutants
discharged to the sewerage system. It has also been effective in protecting the collection,
treatment, and disposal facilities from incidents of pass-through or interference, and it has
enabled OCSD to meet its NPDES ocean discharge limits. The quality of OCSD's influent,
effluent, and biosolids are evidence of the program's progress.
Permits
During FY 2018/19, OCSD administered 555 active permits, of which 339
were Class I permits, 22 Class II permits, 43 Wastehauler permits, 2 discharge certifications, 66
Special Purpose permits, 21 Urban Runoff permits, 39 FOG (Fat, Oil, and Grease) permits, and
23 zero discharge certifications. This level of permit activity represents no significant change
E.2
compared to the total number of active permits at the end of the previous fiscal year. Of the 339
Class I users, 188 were subject to Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards.
Program Costs
The pretreatment program is funded by industrial permit fees, noncompliance sampling fees, and
collection of user charges. The pretreatment program operating expenditures for the fiscal year,
including laboratory analyses, totaled $67,406,407. A total revenue of$17,470,646 in sewer use
charge payments was received and over $117,128 in noncompliance fees and penalties,
including Significant Noncompliance (SNC) reporting and publication fees, were issued through
the pretreatment program.
Inspection, Sampling, and Enforcement
OCSD performed 1,362 industrial inspections during the fiscal year, with the collection of 3,235
samples. Sixty-nine (69) compliance inspections and fifteen (15) compliance meetings were held
with significant industrial users (SIUs) in order to identify and assess noncompliance problems,
and propose long-term solutions. OCSD conducted three covert downstream sampling projects.
Fifteen (15) SIU permittees of the 339 (4%) that were active in FY 2018/19 and listed in the
Monitoring and Compliance Status Appendix A were determined to be in significant non-
compliance and their names were published in the newspaper.
Significant Changes in Operating the Pretreatment Program
There were no significant changes to the OCSD Pretreatment Program during FY 2018/19.
E.2.2 Pretreatment Program Elements
OCSD administers several different program elements designed to meet the goal of controlling
discharges from industrial sources. These have a direct influence on OCSD's ability to meet
federal, ocean discharge, biosolids reuse and disposal, and water reclamation requirements.
Public Participation
OCSD published those industries that were in significant non-compliance in the local newspaper.
Resource Protection Division staff routinely attend outside agency/association meetings,
conferences, and workshops; serve on committees; and give presentations. Working with other
agencies and associations benefits OCSD by keeping abreast of potential future regulation and
trends which may be beneficial or have impacts that OCSD must prepare for, as well as providing
information to the public about OCSD's programs. Please see Chapter 9 for more information.
Wastehauler Program
During FY 2018/2019, 43 wastehaulers were under permit with OCSD, having a total of 128
trucks. During the past fiscal year, 13.2 million gallons of waste were discharged by permitted
wastehaulers at the Plant No. 1 Wastehauler Station.
Total Toxics Organics Waiver Program
Permittees who have not shown detectable levels of Total Toxic Organics (TTOs) based on their
wastewater discharge analytical data for at least one year are eligible to waive the self-monitoring
E.3
requirement if they can certify that TTOs are not used or present at their facility. For FY 2018/19
OCSD granted 117 companies TTO waivers.
Industrial Operations and Maintenance Improvement Program
The ongoing trend in industrial permittee discharge violations have shown that most cases are
due to inadequate operations and maintenance of industry's pretreatment systems as well as
industrial operator error. This was recognized years ago, when the U.S. EPA audit findings of
1998 recommended that OCSD develop and implement an industrial operations and
improvement program. In 1999/2000, OCSD developed a plan that included outreach and
operator training, and enforcement of requirements for operator and operations and maintenance
practices which is still in effect today.
In 2018, OCSD conducted an advanced training course for industrial wastewater treatment
(pretreatment) operators currently employed by facilities holding a Class I Wastewater Discharge
Permit. The course was conducted by an engineering services company (selected via bid
process for a five-year contract in 2014). OCSD provided this training, free of charge, to assist
permittees to obtain and retain a qualified pretreatment operator and to reduce or eliminate
noncompliance due to operation and maintenance and/or operator problems. The training course
consisted of two 4.5-hour classes and a follow-up wastewater audit at the operator facility to
ensure proper implementation of operation and maintenance practices. Those class participants
that attended both classes, passed the exam and quizzes, and successfully fulfilled the audit
requirements, will receive Certificates of Completion.
As 2018 was the last year of the five-year contract, OCSD underwent the process of issuing a
request for proposals to initiate a new contract for 2019, with an option to renew each year until
2024 (5 years total). OCSD will award the new 2019-2024 contract during the next reporting
period.
Non-Industrial Source Control Program
The purpose of OCSD's Non-Industrial Source Control (NISC) Program is to promote and
implement the application of waste management strategies and practices that will reduce or
eliminate the generation of waste at the source, thereby reducing the volume and toxicity of waste
streams entering OCSD's sewerage system. The NISC Program also addresses non-industrial
pollution sources in our commercial and residential discharger community, more details are
available in Chapter 9.
E.2.3 Compliance with NPDES Discharge Requirements
There were no plant upsets, interference, or pass-through incidents attributable to industrial users
in FY 2018/19.
EA
chapter 1
NPDES REQUIREMENTS - PRETREATMENT
Pretreatment Requirements — Compliance with National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Requirements
chapter 1
NPDES REQUIREMENTS - PRETREATMENT
1.1 PRETREATMENT REQUIREMENTS - COMPLIANCE WITH NATIONAL
POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
This section is a summary of the pretreatment program requirements contained in OCSD's NPDES
Permit No. CA0110604, Order No. R8-2012-0035, effective July 20, 2012, jointly issued by the
CRWQCB and EPA Region IX. The requirements for the industrial pretreatment program are listed in
Section VI (C)(4)(c) and Attachment E of the Permit. The requirements are shown below (in bold
italics) using the appropriate numeration found in the permit. Each requirement is followed by a
summary of the activity that has resulted in OCSD's compliance with the permit requirements, or a
reference may be given where additional information can be found in this annual report.
NPDES Section VI. Provisions, C. Special Provisions, 4. Special Provisions for
Municipal Facilities (POTWs Only), c. Pretreatment Program Requirements
(2) The Discharger shall implement and enforce its approved pretreatment program, and all
subsequent revisions, which are hereby made enforceable conditions of this
Order/Permit. The Discharger shall enforce the requirements promulgated pursuant to
Clean Water Act (CWA) Sections 307(b), 307(c), 307(d), and 402(b) with timely,
appropriate and effective enforcement actions. The Discharger shall cause all
nondomestic users subject to federal categorical standards to achieve compliance no
later than the date specified in those requirements, or, in the case of a new
nondomestic user, upon commencement of discharge.
OCSD has an ongoing commitment to meet the provisions of this requirement, and all
pretreatment requirements are enforced as discussed in Chapter 4 of this report. The
Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance) contains specific provisions for new
dischargers that are more stringent than those required by 40 CFR 403.
The ongoing quarterly inspection, sampling, and monitoring program for each Class I
permittee (Significant Industrial User) ensures compliance with federal, state, and local
regulations. The compliance statuses of all permittees subject to federal categorical
standards are shown in the Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SIUs with Monitoring & Compliance
Status, presented in Appendix A of this report.
(3) The Discharger shall perform the pretreatment functions required by 40 CFR Part 403,
including, but not limited to:
(a) Implement the necessary legal authorities as required by 40 CFR 403.8(0(1).
The legal authorities are contained in OCSD's July 1983 Regulations for Use of
District Sewerage Facilities (Ordinance) which were approved by EPA in January
1984, and affirmed during the May 1986 audit. Revised Wastewater Discharge
Regulations ordinances were adopted and became effective September 8, 1989,
February 7, 1992, July 1, 1998, July 1, 2008 October 1, 2009, and most recently on
July 1, 2016.
1.1
(b) Enforce the pretreatment requirements under 40 CFR 403.5 and 403.6.
The requirements to enforce and implement National Pretreatment Standards for
general prohibitions and specific industrial subcategories are contained in OCSD's
Ordinance. Chapter 4 of this report describes OCSD's enforcement efforts for FY
2018/19.
(c) Implement the programmatic functions as required by 40 CFR 403.8(0(2).
The required functions include the identification, quantification, permitting, and
enforcement of the standards set forth in OCSD's Ordinance. Chapters 3 and 4 of
this report describe the permitting and enforcement efforts for FY 2018/19.
(d) Provide the requisite funding and personnel to implement the pretreatment
program as provided in 40 CFR 403.8(0(3).
The pretreatment program is funded by industrial permit fees, noncompliance
sampling fees, and sewer use charges. The pretreatment program's operating
expenditures for FY 2018/19, including laboratory analyses, total $7,406,407.
Chapter 5 of this report provides additional details.
(4) By October 31 of each year, the Discharger shall submit an annual pretreatment report
to the Regional Water Board, US EPA, the State Water Board's Division of Water
Quality-Regulations Unit, and the Orange County Department of Health Services'
Hazardous Materials Division, describing its pretreatment activities over the previous
fiscal year(July 1 through June 30). In the event the Discharger is not in compliance
with any condition or requirement of this Order/Permit, or any pretreatment compliance
inspection/audit requirements, the Discharger shall include the reasons for
noncompliance and state how and when it will comply with such conditions and
requirements. The annual report shall contain, but not be limited to, the following
information:
(a) A summary of analytical results from representative, flow-proportioned, 24-hour
composite sampling of the Discharger's influent and effluent for those
pollutants US EPA has identified under CWA section 307(a) which are known or
suspected to be discharged by nondomestic users. Representative grab
sampling shall be employed for pollutants that may degrade after collection, or
where the use of automatic sampling equipment may otherwise result in
unrepresentative sampling; such pollutants include, but are not limited to,
cyanide, oil and grease, volatile organic compounds, chlorine, phenol, sulfide,
pH, and temperature. Wastewater sampling and analysis shall be performed in
accordance with the minimum frequency of analysis required by the MRP
(Attachment E). The Discharger shall also provide influent and effluent
monitoring data for non-priority pollutants, which the Discharger believes may
be causing or contributing to interference or pass through. The Discharger is
not required to sample and analyze for asbestos. Sludge sampling and analysis
is addressed elsewhere in this Order/Permit. Wastewater sampling and
analysis shall be performed in accordance with 40 CFR 136.
The influent, effluent, and biosolids sampling information is provided in Chapters 2
and 8, and Appendix B of this annual report.
(b) A discussion of upset, interference, or pass through, if any, at the Discharger's
facilities, which the Discharger knows or suspects were caused by
nondomestic users of the POTW system. The discussion shall include the
1.2
reasons why the incidents occurred, any corrective actions taken, and, if
known, the name and address of the responsible nondomestic user(s). The
discussion shall also include a review of the applicable local pollutant
limitations to determine whether any additional limitations, or changes to
existing limitations, are necessary to prevent pass-through, interference, or
noncompliance with sludge disposal requirements.
There were no plant upsets, interference, or pass-through incidents
attributable to industrial users in FY 2018/19.
(c) An updated list of the Discharger's SIUs including their names and addresses,
and a list of deletions, additions and SIU name changes keyed to the previously
submitted list. The Discharger shall provide a brief explanation for each
change. The list shall identify the SIUs subject to federal categorical standards
by specifying which set(s) of standards are applicable to each SIU. The list
shall also indicate which SIUs are subject to local limitations.
Appendix A of this report, the Monitoring and Compliance Status Report, is an
updated list of significant industrial users which identifies which local or set of
categorical standards applies.
(d) The Discharger shall characterize the compliance status of each SIU by
providing a list or table for the following:
Name of SIU;
Category, if subject to categorical standards;
Type of wastewater treatment or control processes in place;
Number of samples taken by SIU during the year,
Number of samples and inspections by Discharger during the year,
For an SIU subject to discharge requirements for total toxic organics,
whether all required certifications were provided;
A list of pretreatment standards (categorical or local) violated during the
year, or any other violations;
SIUs in significant noncompliance (SNC) as defined at 40 CFR
403.8(0(2)(viii), at any time during the year,
A summary of enforcement actions or any other actions taken against SIUs
during the year. Describe the type of action, final compliance date, and the
amount of fines and/or penalties collected, if any. Describe any proposed
actions for bringing SIUs into compliance.
This annual report contains all of the items listed above. SIU names, categories,
number of samples and inspections, violations, and SNC status are shown in
Appendix A. SIU wastewater treatment is shown in Appendix J, Total Toxic Organic
waivers are shown in Chapter 6, and enforcement actions are shown in Chapter 4 and
Appendix D.
1.3
(e) A brief description of any programs the Discharger implements to reduce
pollutants from nondomestic users not classified as SIUs.
The activities for OCSD's non-industrial source control and pollution prevention
programs are discussed in Chapters 6 and 9.
(1J A brief description of any significant changes in operating the pretreatment
program which differ from the previous year, including, but not limited to,
changes in the program's administrative structure, local limits, monitoring
program, legal authority, enforcement policy, funding, and staffing levels.
The description of significant changes to the pretreatment program, if any, are
discussed in Chapter 6.
(g) A summary of the annual pretreatment program budget, including the cost of
pretreatment program functions and equipment purchases.
For FY 2018/19, the operating expenses for the pretreatment program were
approximately $7,406,407. Additional information on pretreatment program costs and
purchases are shown in Chapter 5 of this report.
(h) A summary of activities to involve and inform the public of the pretreatment
program, including a copy of the newspaper notice, if any, required by 40 CFR
403.8(0(2)(vii)[sic].
A copy of the significant non-compliance notice (SNC) for newspaper publication can
be found in Appendix E.
(i) A description of any changes in sludge disposal methods.
Biosolids information can be found in Chapter 8 of this report.
(]) A description of the program to quantify, characterize, regulate, and treat flow
from low-flow urban runoff diversion systems and "first flush"industrial storm
water diversion systems that are routed to the sanitary sewer collection system.
Information on OCSD's urban runoff program is shown in Chapter 9 of this report.
(k) A discussion of any concerns not described elsewhere in the annual report.
There were no concerns for FY 2018/19.
(6) Nonindustrial Source Control Program and Public Education Program
The Discharger shall continue to develop and implement its nonindustrial source
control program and public education program. The purpose of these programs is to
eliminate the entrance of nonindustrial toxic pollutants and pesticides into the POTW.
The nonindustrial source control program will be supplemented with an updated survey
of industrial and nonindustrial contaminant sources. These programs shall be
periodically reviewed and addressed in the annual report.
The non-industrial source control program (NISC) information can be found in Chapter 9 of
this annual report.
1.4
ATTACHMENT E, SECTION VII. Effluent Mass Emission Benchmarks
The following mass emission benchmarks[Table E-5]have been established for the effluent
discharge. For each parameter with a mass emission benchmark, the Discharger shall report
the annual mass emission, and the effluent concentrations and flows used to calculate the
annual mass emission, in the annual pretreatment report and annual receiving water
monitoring report(effluent chapter).
The mass emission benchmark information is contained in Chapter 2 of this annual report.
1.5
chapter 2
OCSD's FACILITIES AND COMPLIANCE WITH
DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS
Introduction
Existing OCSD Facilities
Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Requirements
Effluent Characteristics
Facilities Special Projects
Metals
Mass Emission Benchmarks
Chapter 2
OCSD FACILITIES AND COMPLIANCE WITH DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS
2.1 INTRODUCTION
OCSD is responsible for collecting,transporting and treating wastewater, and reusing or disposing of the
treated wastewater and the separated solids in accordance with all applicable federal,state and local laws
and regulations.The following pages present a summary of the operation of the wastewater treatment and
collection facilities, and the historical data and the regulatory compliance record for FY 2018/19 (July 1,
2018 through June 30, 2019). OCSD is also enrolled in the statewide Waste Discharge Requirements
program for sanitary sewers.
OCSD operates and maintains Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No.2, 389 miles of sewers,
and 15 outlying pump stations. The treatment plants and pump stations are supervised, operated, and
maintained by highly trained professionals with appropriate certifications from the California State Water
Resources Control Board for treatment plant operators,and the appropriate voluntary certification from the
California Water Environment Association.
The treated wastewater is discharged into the Pacific Ocean in strict and consistent compliance with state
and federal requirements as set forth in OCSD's NPDES permit, or directed to the Orange County Water
District(OCWD)for reclamation.Approximately 117 million gallons per day(MGD)of treated wastewater
was routed to facilities operated by the OCWD during FY 2018/19. The Groundwater Replenishment
System (GWRS) produces purified recycled water used to recharge the Orange County Groundwater
Basin and protect it from degradation due to seawater intrusion. Phase II of GWRS continues to produce
100 MGD of reclaimed water.
During FY 2018/19, OCSD beneficially recycled 98%of the dewatered biosolids for use as agricultural soil
amendments and compost products. Total biosolids production for this fiscal year was approximately
254,405 wet tons, more than 12% reduction from 291,488 wet tons in 2017/18. This is mainly due to
higher solids separation from the new centrifuge operations at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 starting early
2019.As such,solids content has been increased to 20.9%for Plant No. 1 and 22.2%for Plant No.2.Two
management options(land application and composting)were utilized through four vendor contracts in two
states and five counties. OCSD's Biosolids Management Compliance Report for calendar year 2018
describes the solids management program in more detail (ocsewers.com/503). Grit and screenings are
transported under contract for landfill disposal. Debris and grit removed from the sewers during cleaning is
dried at Plant No. 1 and then hauled to a landfill for disposal.
OCSD's primary and secondary treatment, digestion, and dewatering facilities were all operated within
their respective design capacities for the entire fiscal year.
2.1
2.2 EXISTING OCSD FACILITIES
OCSD's operations start with the collection of wastewater from the residential,commercial, and industrial
customers in 20 cities,four special districts,and portions of unincorporated Orange County.The average
daily flow tributary to OCSD per year since 1997 is shown in Table 2.1.
TABLE 2.1 Average Daily Influent and Effluent Flow in Million Gallons Per Day (MGD)
Fiscal Years 1997-2019
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Influent Effluent Fiscal Influent Effluent
Year MGD MGD Year MGD MGD
1997 244 242 2009 211a 167
1998 255° 255 2010 207 152
1999 241 239 2011 207 152
2000 241 236 2012 201 139
2001 246 244 2013 200 137
2002 235 231 2014 198 137
2003 239 235 2015 187 117
2004 238 238 2016 183 92
2005 244 247b 2017 188 101
2006 234 235 2018 185 88
2007 229 232b 2019 191 104
2008 221a 212d
a. Decrease due to drought; less infiltration due to drier soils and business recession.
b. There was more effluent than influent due to in-plant construction dewatering that was
discharged downstream of influent metering.
c. El Nino (wet year).
d. Beginning in 2008, more influent than effluent due to Groundwater Replenishment System
2.2.1 Description of Treatment Plants
Based on population served, OCSD is one of the largest wastewater facilities in the United States. The
network of interceptor sewers, treatment units and disposal systems is quite complex. The following
sections provide an overview of the treatment facilities.
2.2.1.1 Reclamation Plant No. 1
Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in the City of Fountain Valley adjacent to the Santa Ana River. The
metering and diversion structure, constructed in 1974, allows the excess wastewater from any of six trunk
sewers tributary to Plant No. 1 to be diverted to Plant No. 2 to not overload the capacity of Plant No. 1 or to
provide for maintenance or construction activities. The metering and diversion structure also contains pH
meters, conductivity meters, and flow meters to monitor the incoming wastewater on each trunk sewer.This
operational flexibility also allows Plant No. 1 to provide the highest quality of wastewater for reclamation at
OCWD. Flows from the Santa Ana River Interceptor trunkline,which contains Santa Ana Watershed Project
Authority brines, are diverted to Plant No. 2.
The wastewater flows through bar screens with 5/8-inch-wide openings where large solids(e.g., rags, non-
dispersible materials, plastics, grease chunks) are removed. Wastewater is then pumped to aerated grit
chambers where the velocity of the water is slowed to allow coffee grounds, seeds, sand, gravel, and other
heavy particulate debris to settle out. All the screenings and grit are hauled by a contractor to a landfill for
disposal. Foul air at the treatment plants is captured from the trunk sewers at the metering and diversion
structure, headworks structures and grit chambers for treatment in the odor control chemical scrubbers.Four
2.2
on duty and one standby main sewage pumps lift flow to the grit chambers.
For improved performance, chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) is done. Ferric chloride and
anionic polymer are added to the primary clarifiers to enhance the settling of the organic solids. Each primary
clarifier is covered to capture foul air for treatment in scrubbers. Plant No. 1 has a primary treatment capacity
of 204 MGD.
During FY 2018/19, 100% of the Plant No. 1 primary effluent received secondary (biological) treatment in
either conventional air activated sludge secondary treatment process or trickling filters. An average of 117
MGD of the secondary treated water was pumped to OCWD's GWRS and the Green Acres Project(GAP)for
advanced tertiary treatment.Advanced tertiary treatment prepares the water for injection into the groundwater
as a barrier against saltwater intrusion, and for percolation to the aquifer for water reclamation and reuse.
OCWD also provides GAP water for industrial uses to OCSD. The balance of the Plant No. 1 secondary
effluent flows by gravity to Plant No. 2 where it is blended with treated wastewater from Plant No. 2 prior to
pumping and ocean disposal.
Solids collected in the primary and secondary clarifiers are pumped to anaerobic digesters for organic waste
stabilization and pathogen destruction at 98 degrees Fahrenheit (°F). Following digestion, the sludge is
dewatered using a centrifuge process. The centrifuge-dewatered biosolids are removed by private
contractors.Stabilization results in the production of digester gas,a fuel which is approximately 63%methane
and 36% carbon dioxide. This fuel has a heating value of about 631 Btu/cu.ft. The primary and secondary
sludge is blended and thickened in the thickening centrifuge units prior to digestion. Digester gas is gathered,
compressed, cleaned and distributed to the Central Power Generation System (CGS) at each plant as a
renewable fuel for energy generation.
At Plant No. 1, natural gas and digester gas fuel three internal combustion engines that power 2,500 kilowatt
(kW)electric generators. During winter months(Oct.-May)only two of the three engine generators operate at
one time to meet air quality permit limits. During Summer months (June-Sept.) all three engines operate
during peak hours to reduce Southern California Edison (SCE) electricity cost. Supplemental power was
purchased from SCE to provide for the remainder of the Plant No. 1 energy demand. The internal
combustion engines were fueled primarily with digester gas with a small amount(approximately 5-10%)of
purchased natural gas added to aid combustion.
2.2.1.2 Treatment Plant No. 2
Treatment Plant No. 2 is located in the city of Huntington Beach near the mouth of the Santa Ana River.
Five trunk sewers transport wastewater into Headworks D facility,which contains pH meters,conductivity
meters, and flow meters, along with six mechanically cleaned bar screens, seven main sewage pumps
and six grit tanks.All screenings and grit are hauled by a private contractor to a landfill for disposal. The
foul air from the headworks, grit tanks, and primary sedimentation basins is collected for treatment in a
combination of chemical scrubbers and biotowers.
Ferric chloride and anionic polymer are used to enhance the settling of solids during primary treatment.
Settleable and suspended solids, and floatable particulates are removed from the wastewater in primary
sedimentation basins and pumped to anaerobic digesters for stabilization. Plant No. 2 primary effluent
receives 100% secondary treatment in either oxygen activated sludge process or trickling filters.
Sludge from the primary and secondary settling basins is treated in anaerobic digesters. Secondary
sludge is thickened in DAF units prior to digestion. Following digestion, the sludge is dewatered using a
dewatering centrifuge process. The centrifuge-dewatered biosolids are removed by private contractors.
The Plant No. 2 Central Power Generation System has five internal combustion engines that power five
3,000 kW electric generators and a 1,000-kW steam turbine powered by engine exhaust waste heat.Only
two engine generators were usually operated at any one time based on digester gas availability. During
periods of lower demand excess power was sold to SCE,while power was imported during periods of high
demand. The internal combustion engines were fueled primarily with digester gas with a small amount
(approximately 5-10%)of natural gas.
2.3
�t AN
O�
�2
TN E NN�P
LOSANGELESCOUNTY
LANABRA syae 1
Fq
R
or"
9
k9,�C�L1 oryG�p
5� �ti�Y `tilt
FULLERTON YORBA LI NDA
PeY' PLACENTR
F
OF,
LA PALMA n
CYPRESS s
VILLA
PARK
LOS STANTON
ALAM1T09
r
V
GARDEN GROVE
SEALBEACH W TMINSTER
1
MIDWAY SANTAANA
TUSTIN
FOUNT VALLEY
t
HUNTING
OCSD COSTAMESA
Plant No.1 IRVINE I \�
FORKE
EiT RANCHO
OCSD SANTA MARGUERITA
Plant No.2 en��" Nr NEWPORTSEACH rBSION
LAGUNA VIGIO
OCSO 1VwI)S
0—Otlfell Pipe
1120'dem.5 miles 1,xVI
LAGUNA
HILLS
ALISO
dffuw S—im VIEJO
(1 mile to J
500 ports)
NA
BEACH �p�A
1/OUEL
Legend SANJUAN
PMITRAW
Orange County Boundary
OCSD Service Area DAM PON
- Boundary(471 sq crates) saN
CLBBS=
Unicorporated Area
Figure 2-1 Map of Orange County Sanitation District's Service Area
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
2.4
2.2.1.3 Joint Works Facilities
Facilities common to both plants are designated as Joint Works Facilities.These include the bypass sewer
to divert wastewater from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2, effluent lines to convey treated wastewater from
Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2 for ocean discharge, a fiber optic cable line for interplant communication,
digester gas transmission and storage line,two outfall pumping stations,two ocean outfalls(designated in
the NPDES permit as Discharge Serial Nos. 001 and 002), and the emergency gravity overflow flap gate
valves into the Santa Ana River(Discharge Serial No. 003).
Treated secondary effluent from Plants Nos. 1 and 2 is pumped to OCSD's main discharge point, the
120-inch diameter, 5-mile long ocean outfall (the last mile of which is a diffuser with 503 ports that
provides a minimum of 250:1 dilution). During FY 2018/19 all influent received secondary treatment.
2.3 COMPLIANCE WITH NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) REQUIREMENTS
This section provides a summary of limitations contained in OCSD's NPDES permit(Order No. R8-2012-
0035/NPDES Permit No. CA0110604, effective on July 20, 2012). Table 2.2 shows NPDES permit
discharge requirements and OCSD's annual average influent and final effluent discharge values for this
reporting period.
2.5
TABLE 2.2 NPDES Permit Discharge Requirements and OCSD's Annual Average Influent and Final Effluent Discharge Values for
Fiscal Year 2018-19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
OCSD's NPDES Permit Discharge Requirement OCSD's
Combined Final Effluent Compliance
Influent Annual 30-Day 7-Day Annual with NPDES
Constituent Average Average Average Daily Maximum Average' Permit Limits
Flow, MGD 191 104 NA
BOD-C,mg/L 190 25 40 4.8 Yes
BOD-C, lb./day 57,129 91,406 4,103 Yes
BOD-C percent removal >852 98.7 Yes
Suspended Solids, mg/L 382 30 45 5.7 Yes
Suspended Solids, lb./day 68,555 102,832 4,991 Yes
TSS percent removal >752 99.2 Yes
Grease and Oil,mg/L 43.6 25 40 75 0.2 Yes
Grease and Oil,lb./day 57,129 91,406 171,387 200 Yes
Settleable Solids,mL/L 1.0 1.5 3.0 ND Yes
Toxicity,acute Pass/Fail P Yes
Toxicity,chronic Pass/Fail P Yes
Turbidity, NTU 75 100 225 2.5 Yes
pH 8.1 6.0 to 9.0 6.0 to 9.0 9.0 8.0 Yes
Total Chlorine Residual, mg/L 0.363 1.45 0.083 Yes
Total Chlorine Residual, lb./day 823' 3,313 60' Yes
Benzidine, pg/L ND 0.01249 ND Yes
Benzidine, lb./day 0.0285 Yes
Chlordane, pg/L ND 0.00416 ND Yes
Chlordane, lb./day 0.0097 Yes
3,3-dichlorobenzidine, pg/L ND 1.4661 ND Yes
3,3-dichlorobenzidine, lb./day 3.3992 Yes
Hexachlorobenzene, pg/L ND 0.0380 ND Yes
Hexachlorobenzene, lb./day 0.0868 Yes
PAHs, pg/L ND 1.5928 ND Yes
PAHs,lb./day 3.6929 Yes
PCBs, pg/L ND 0.0034 ND Yes
PCBs,lb./day 0.0078 Yes
TCDD equivalents, pg/L NR 0.706 ND Yes
TCDD equivalents, Mlb/day 0.001613 Yes
Toxaphene, pg/L NR 0.03801 ND Yes
Toxa hene, lb./day 0.0869 Yes
Additional influent/effluent data is shown in Appendix B
Not determined
Based on the average of the values reported in the monthly Discharge Monitoring Report.For values based on 30-day rolling maximum averages, refer to the
Benchmark section of the Source Control and Ocean Monitoring Annual Reports.
2 Monthly average minimum
3 6-month median
ND Non-detectable
NR Not required. NPDES Permit requires monitoring and analysis of TCDD equivalents in effluent only.
NA Not Applicable
2.6
2.4 EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
2.4.1 General
The OCSD National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit establishes water quality
effluent constituent compliance limits for major wastewater parameters and toxic materials.The following
sections represent a review of the current and historical compliance status for the major wastewater
parameters.OCSD's annual average ocean discharge parameters for the past five fiscal years are shown
in Table 2.3
2.4.2 Suspended Solids
During FY 2018/19,the suspended solids discharge was in complete compliance with our NPDES permit
effluent limits.The final effluent monthly average suspended solids concentration of 5.7 mg/L for a monthly
average discharge mass emissions rate of 4,991 pounds per day (lb./day) during FY 2018/19 is 19% of
the allowable 30-day average concentration limit of 30 mg/L, and 7.3% of the mass emissions limit of
68,555 lb./day.
TABLE 2.3 Suspended Solids and BOD-C Annual Average Daily Influent and
Final Effluent for Fiscal Years 2013-2019
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
SUSPENDED SOLIDS BOD-C
Fiscal Influent Effluent Influent Effluent
Year mg/L lb./day mg/L lb./day mg/L lb./day mg/L lb./day
2013-14 337 556,500 6.4 7,300 178 293,900 5.1 5,800
2014-15 342 533,400 5.7 5,600 187 291,600 4.8 4,700
2015-16 362 552,500 6.0 4,600 212 323,600 4.4 3,400
2016-17 396 620,900 5.3 4,500 212 332,400 4.8 4,000
2017-18 396 611,000 5.0 3,700 220 339,400 4.4 3,200
2018-19 382 611,700 5.7 4,990 214 342,700 4.8 4,200
2.4.3 Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD-C)
The current 30-day average discharge permit limit for carbonaceous BOD is 25 mg/L.The discharge was
in consistent compliance for FY 2018/19. The final effluent 30-day average for FY 2018/19 was 4.8 mg/L
with a removal rate of 97%.
2.4.4 Oil and Grease
The NPDES 30-day effluent limit for oil and grease is 25 mg/L and 57,129 lb./day.Average oil and grease
was measured at 0.2 mg/L in the treated effluent during this fiscal year.
2.7
2.4.5 Settleable Solids
The 30-day average permit limit for settleable solids is 1.0 milliliter per liter(mL/L)with a maximum at any
time of 3.0 mL/L. The FY 2018/19 average for settleable solids was non-detectable. A summary of the
annual average settleable solids data for the past five years is shown in Table 2.4.
2.4.6 Turbidity
Turbidity is a measurement of the microscopic suspended solids or finely divided silty particles in water
discharged to the ocean.The compliance limit for turbidity is 75 nephelometric turbidity units(NTU)based
on a 30-day average.The FY 2018/19 average turbidity was 2.5 NTU.A summary of the turbidity data for
the past five years is shown in Table 2.4.
TABLE 2.4 Settleable Solids, Turbidity, and pH, Average Final Effluent for Fiscal Years
2013-2019
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Settleable Solids Turbidity
Year mL/L NTU pH
2013-14 ND 4.3 7.9
2014-15 ND 3.4 7.9
2015-16 ND 3.1 7.9
2016-17 ND 3.1 8.1
2017-18 ND 3.4 8.0
2018-19 ND 2.5 8.0
2.4.7 pH
According to OCSD's NPDES permit,the pH of the ocean discharge shall neither exceed 9.0 nor be less
than 6.0. The effluent was in compliance throughout FY 2018/19. The annual mean pH was 8.0, well
within the high and low pH effluent limits.The ocean discharge pH has remained relatively constant over
the past six years, as summarized in Table 2.4.
2.4.8 Toxicity
OCSD's NPDES permit(Order No. R8-2012-0035) requires that the final effluent be tested once a
month for chronic toxicity, and quarterly for acute toxicity. Results of acute and chronic toxicity tests
are reported as either a "Pass"or"Fail"following the Test of Significant Toxicity hypothesis testing
approach described in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Test of Significant
Toxicity Implementation Document(EPA 833-R-10-003, 2010).
Every calendar year the effluent must be tested using each of the species listed in the NPDES permit
to determine which species are most sensitive to the effluent. The most sensitive test species are
then used as the test organisms for monthly and quarterly testing. In October 2018, acute toxicity
tests were performed to determine the more sensitive of two acute test species: the topsmelt fish,
Atherinops affinis and mysid crustacean, Americamysis bahia. The tests demonstrated that the
topsmelt was the more sensitive species for the acute test. All FY 2018/19 quarterly acute tests
utilized the topsmelt.
In October 2018, chronic toxicity tests were performed to determine the most sensitive of three
chronic test species: the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera;the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus
2.8
purpuratus; and the topsmelt, Atherinops affinis. The tests demonstrated that the purple sea urchin
was the more sensitive species for the chronic test. All FY 2018/19 monthly chronic tests utilized the
purple sea urchin.
Table 2.5 summarizes the toxicity testing results for fiscal years 2014/15 through 2018/19.All FY 2018/19
acute (n=4 tests) and chronic(n=12)toxicity tests passed indicating no final effluent toxicity.
Table 2.5 Final Effluent Yearly Average Toxicity Results for Fiscal Years 2014-2019
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year Toxicity
2014/2015 Acute (A. affinis) Pass
Chronic(S.purpuratus) Pass
2015/20160) Acute (A. affinis) Pass
Chronic(S.purpuratus&A. affinis) Pass
2016/2017(2) Acute (A. affinis) Pass
Chronic(A. affinis&S.purpuratus) Pass
2017/2018 Acute (A. affinis) Pass
Chronic(S.purpuratus) Pass
2018/2019 Acute (A. affinis) Pass
Chronic(S.purpuratus) Pass
FY 2015/16 monthly chronic testing was conducted using the purple sea urchin from July 2015
to December 2015 and the topsmelt from January 2016 to June 2016.
(2) FY 2016/17 monthly chronic testing was conducted using topsmelt from July 2016 to October 2016
and the purple sea urchin from November 2016 to June 2017.
2.5 FACILITIES SPECIAL PROJECTS
2.5.1 Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 Thickening & Dewatering Centrifuge Facilities
OCSD has been commissioning new dewatering centrifuge processes at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2,
which the belt-filter presses are to be replaced with. Plant No. 1 centrifuges started operation in Dec.2018
and Plant No. 2 centrifuges started in Apr. 2019. Due to the improved dewaterability, both wet-tonnage
solids and biosolids trucks have been reduced by one third and the total percentage solids have been
increasing significantly, resulting in approximately 24%at Plant No. 1 and 27%at Plant No.2. Plant No 1.
As a result,a significant saving in biosolids hauling cost has been observed.The project has also replaced
the existing dissolved air floatation thickening units with the thickening centrifuges. The new thickening
centrifuges co-thicken primary and secondary-blended sludge and the co-thickened sludge with up to 7%
total solids is being fed into digesters. With the higher total percentage solids, up to 40% increased
detention time of the digesters has been exhibited. This effort can also eliminate the potential future
digester capital cost.
2.5.2 Plant No. 1 Trickling Filters Bleach Testing
Operations has been receiving odor complaints from odors generated in the trickling filters over the past
years. Typically, the odor complaints increase during cooler weather(fall and winter). The Engineering
Department has a project scheduled to install dome covers on the trickling filters, but this may not occur
until 2030. For testing purposes, Process Engineering added bleach to the trickling filter feed flow to
prevent anaerobic conditions within the trickling filter. If the test is proven successful, it may eliminate the
need for OCSD to pursue the costly endeavor of placing dome covers on the trickling filters. Process
Engineering staff evaluated the trickling filter performance at different bleach dosages,up to 4 mg/L,which
resulted with minimal impacts to the trickling filter liquid performance parameters. The tests were
2.9
conducted for 5 hours at a time. The next step will be to conduct sustained bleach doses for consecutive
days, where staff can collect odor data from the trickling filter stack and media and evaluate the impacts
that bleach has on mitigating odors.
2.6 METALS
The concentrations of seven metals (cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, silver, and zinc) are
monitored monthly by OCSD. The results of these analyses are used to evaluate efficiencies,trend inputs
from discrete sources, and potential toxic concentrations in the secondary facilities, anaerobic digesters,
and dewatered sludges.
The average metal concentrations in OCSD's influent and effluent for the last five years are shown in
Table 2.6.
TABLE 2.6 Average Metal Concentrations and Mass in the Influent and Effluent
for Fiscal Years 2015-2019
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
Constituent 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19
Cadmium
mg/L 0.00120 0.00142 0.00285 0.00301 0.00163 ND ND ND ND ND
lb/day 2 1 2 2 2 ND ND ND ND ND
Chromium
mg/L 0.0076 0.0182 0.0175 0.0168 0.0160 0.00164 0.00074 0.00065 0.00065 0.00083
lb/day 12 13 13 12 12 2 6 0.6 0.5 0.7
Copper
mg/L 0.1076 0.2560 0.250 0.216 0.214 0.0103 0.0143 0.0098 0.0051 0.0037
lb/day 168 184 188 161 165 10 11 8 4 3
Lead
mg/L 0.00248 0.00540 0.00466 0.00594 0.00558 0.00005 0.00005 0.00005 0.00007 0.00006
lb/day 4 4 3 4 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Nickel
mg/L 0.0179 0.0319 0.0306 0.0250 0.0214 0.0128 0.0188 0.0132 0.0114 0.0084
lb/day 28 23 23 18 16 12 14 11 8.4 7
Silver
mg/L 0.00139 0.00305 0.00324 0.00268 0.00259 0.00011 0.00003 0.00002 0.000049 ND
lb/day 2 2 2 2 2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 ND
Zinc
mg/L 0.1640 0.1710 0.4200 0.3870 0.3560 0.0213 0.0383 0.0318 0.0293 0.0234
lb/day 256 297 318 286 274 21 29 27 22 20
Total Average
lb/day 471 524 549 486 476 45 55 47 35 31
2014-15 Influent mass based on 187 MGD 2014-15 Effluent mass based on 117 MGD
2015-16 Influent mass based on 183 MGD 2015-16 Effluent mass based on 92 MGD
2016-17 Influent mass based on 188 MGD 2016-17 Effluent mass based on 101 MGD
2017-18 Influent mass based on 185 MGD 2017-18 Effluent mass based on 88 MGD
2018-19 Influent mass based on 191 MGD 2018-19 Effluent mass based on 104 MGD
2.7 MASS EMISSION BENCHMARKS
OCSD's National Pollutant Elimination Discharge System(NPDES)permit(Order R8-2012-0035, NPDES
Permit No.CA0110604, in effect during this July 1,2018 through June 30,2019 reporting period)contains
Mass Emission Benchmarks for 72 constituents as identified in Section VII. Effluent Mass Emission
Benchmarks, Table E-5 on pg. E-31 of Attachment E- Monitoring and Reporting Program. These mass
emission benchmarks are not water quality-based effluent limits; however,OCSD will use this information
as part of its annual evaluation of local limits.
2.10
The mass emission benchmarks report is required to compare each constituent's sample result with the
minimum level (ML) for that constituent contained in the permit. According to the permit requirement,
sample results that are less than the reported ML but greater than the method detection limit(MDL)are to
be reported as zero prior to calculating the 12-month constituent average. Some of the values in the Mass
Emission Benchmarks report differ from those found in the Priority Pollutants report since the former relies
on the ML as the threshold of detection while the latter uses the MDL as the threshold for reporting.
Most of the heavy metal results fell in the range of 0.0% to 17% of their respective benchmarks with the
exception of selenium which was 48%. Unlike many of the benchmarked organic constituents,OCSD had
extensive historic heavy metals sampling frequencies and detectable levels on which to base its
benchmarks. As a result, the heavy metal data has less statistical variance from the established
benchmarks. With continuing improvements in the pretreatment program, the heavy metals benchmark
results verify the decreasing mass emission trends since constituents are less than their historic values.
Heavy metals are covered under existing local pretreatment limits. The local limits for those constituents
were evaluated as part of the revised wastewater ordinance and local limits effective on July 1, 2016.
Most of the organic compounds with benchmarks were rarely detected in the effluent. As a result, 67
organic and metal constituents reached only a small fraction(<10%)of their respective benchmarks. More
than half of the 72 constituents were not detected in OCSD's effluent, and are listed as zero (0) metric
tons/year emitted and zero (0) percent of the benchmark. Historically, these constituents were rarely
detected in OCSD's effluent, so the benchmarks could only be based on the method detection limits
(MDL). As OCSD continues to increase the sensitivity of its detection limits, some constituents may be
discernible in the future. As detection limits are lowered, there will likely be fewer zero-tons-emitted
constituents in OCSD's list of benchmarks.
2.11
TABLE 2.7 Mass Emissions for All Benchmark Constituents- Fiscal Year 2018-19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
2018-19 2018-19 2018-19
12-Mo. Avg 12-Mo. Avg Percent of Freq.
Constituent Benchmark Actual Benchmark Min. Mass Max. Mass Sample Freq. Detected Avg. Flow
MT/Year I MT/Year Percent Tons/Year I Tons/Year Count Count MGD
1,1,1-trichloroethane 17.13 10 10 10 10 112 10 1112.37
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 11.92 10 10 10 10 112 10 1112.37
1,1,2-trichloroethane 1.92 0 0 0 0 12 0 112.37
1,1-dichloroethylene 1.92 0 0 0 0 12 0 112.37
1,2-dichloroethane 1.92 0 0 0 0 12 0 112.37
1,2-diphenylhydrazine 15.4 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
1,3-dichloropropene 1.92 0 0 0 0 12 0 112.37
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 7.68 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 7.68 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
2,4-Dinitrophenol 76.81 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 7.68 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 4.989 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
4,6-Dinitro-2-meth (phenol 76.81 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
Acrolein 24.96 0 0 0 0 12 0 112.37
Acrylonitrile 18.06 0 0 0 0 12 0 112.37
Aldrin 0.08 0 0 0 0 2 0 93.95
Antimony 119.2 10.172 10.9 10.121031 10.211052 112 112 1114.55
Arsenic 11.92 10.32 116.67 10.254689 10.389137 112 112 1114.55
Benzene 13.23 10 10 10 10 112 10 1112.37
Benzidine 76.81 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
Beryllium 1.92 0 0 0 0 12 0 114.55
bis 2-Chloroethox methane 15.4 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
bis 2-Chloroeth I ether 15.4 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
bis 2-Chloroisoprop I ether 15.4 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
bis 2-Eth (hex I phthalate 36.67 0.067 0.18 0 0.459717 12 3 119.65
Cadmium 0.55 0 0 0 0 12 0 114.55
Carbon tetrachloride 1.92 0 0 0 0 12 0 112.37
2.12
TABLE 2.7 Mass Emissions for All Benchmark Constituents- Fiscal Year 2018-19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
2018-19 2018-19 2018-19
12-Mo. Avg 12-Mo. Avg Percent of Freq.
Constituent Benchmark Actual Benchmark Min. Mass Max. Mass Sample Freq. Detected Avg. Flow
MT/Year I MT/Year Percent Tons/Year I Tons/Year Count Count MGD
Chlordane total 10.76 10 10 10 10 12 10 193.95
Chlorobenzene 11.91 10 10 10 10 112 10 1112.37
Chloroform 2.74 1.122 40.95 0 1.8968 12 11 112.37
Chromium 2.94 0.126 4.29 0.103731 0.171245 12 12 114.55
Copper 31.52 0.559 1.77 0.351503 0.870987 12 12 114.55
Cyanide 7.75 1.052 13.57 0.348682 5.638212 12 12 106.27
DDT 0.26 0 0 0 0 2 0 93.95
Dichlorobenzenes 15.4 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
Dichloromethane 19.2 0.039 0.2 0 0.158281 12 3 112.37
Dieldrin 0.08 0 0 0 0 2 0 93.95
Dieth (phthalate 13.65 0.014 0.1 0 0.162137 12 1 119.65
Dimeth (phthalate 7.68 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
Di-n-butylphthalate 15.39 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
Endosulfan 0.23 0 0 0 0 2 0 93.95
Endrin 10.04 10 10 10 10 2 10 93.95
Ethylbenzene 11.92 10 10 10 10 112 10 112.37
Fluoranthene 7.68 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
Halomethanes 13.44 0.01 0.07 0 0.11574 12 1 112.37
HCH 0.3 0 0 0 0 2 0 93.95
Heptachlor 0.08 0 0 0 0 4 0 93.95
Hexachlorobenzene 7.68 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
Hexachlorobutadiene 15.4 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
Hexachloroc clopentadiene 15.4 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
Hexachloroethane 7.68 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
Isophorone 7.68 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
Lead 1.29 0.009 0.7 0 0.081887 12 2 114.55
Mercury 0.08 0.001 1.25 0.000438 0.001145 12 12 114.55
Nickel 110.55 11.262 111.96 11.118644 11.552482 112 112 1114.55
2.13
TABLE 2.7 Mass Emissions for All Benchmark Constituents- Fiscal Year 2018-19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
2018-19 2018-19 2018-19
12-Mo. Avg 12-Mo. Avg Percent of Freq.
Constituent Benchmark Actual Benchmark Min. Mass Max. Mass Sample Freq. Detected Avg. Flow
MT/Year I MT/Year Percent Tons/Year I Tons/Year Count Count MGD
Nitrobenzen 17.68 10 10 10 10 112 10 1119.65
n-Nitrosodimethylamine 14.61 10 10 10 10 112 10 1119.65
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine 7.68 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
PAHs 99.854 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
PCB 13.44 0 0 0 0 2 0 93.95
Selenium 1.92 0.922 48.02 0.655031 1.47915 12 12 114.55
Silver 2.67 0 0 0 0 12 0 114.55
TCDD Equivalents 19.21 0 0 0 0 4 0 112.14
Tetrachloroeth lene 1.92 0 0 0 0 12 0 112.37
Thallium 3.84 0 0 0 0 12 0 114.55
Toluene 3.98 0 0 0 0 12 0 112.37
Total Chlorinated Phenols 27.6 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
Total Non-Chlorinated 218 0 0 0 0 12 0 119.65
Phenols
Toxaphene 1.92 0 0 0 0 2 0 93.95
trichloroethene 1.92 0 0 0 0 12 0 112.37
vinyl chloride 3.84 0 0 0 0 12 0 112.37
Zinc 140.7 13.494 18.58 12.598612 14.650292 112 112 1114.55
2.14
chapter 3
PERMITS
Introduction
Permit Classifications
Permit Issuance
Discharge Limits
Establishing Mass Emission Rates (MER)
chapter 3
PERMITS
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) implements permitting and certification control
mechanisms which contain effluent limits for all standards;statements of duration and non-transferability;
self-monitoring, sampling, reporting, record-keeping and notification requirements; and statements of
applicable civil and criminal penalties for discharge violations. The following sections describe the
different classifications of permits, how new permittees are identified, and how discharge limits are
established.
3.2 PERMIT CLASSIFICATIONS
There are seven permit and certification classifications for users that discharge to OCSD's sewerage
system: Class I, Class II, Wastehaulers, Special Purpose, Urban Runoff, FOG (Fats, Oils, and Grease),
and Discharge Certifications.
Class I Permits
Class I dischargers are defined as Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) in accordance with federal
regulations. Examples of these users include plating shops, printed circuit board shops, large food
processors, textile companies with high-volume flows, and industries capable of discharging
non-compatible pollutants. A listing of the Class I permittees is given in Appendix A.
A Class I Permit is issued to any user who meets any one of the following conditions:
1. Is subject to federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards; or
2. Averages 25,000 gallons per day or more of regulated process wastewater; or
3. Has a reasonable potential for adversely affecting OCSD's operation or for violating any
pretreatment standard, local limit, or discharge requirement; or
4. May cause pass through or interference with OCSD's sewerage facilities.
Class II Permits
Class II permittees include commercial enterprises such as restaurants, supermarkets, large
entertainment/service venues, or other high-use non-significant users.
A Class II Permit is issued to any user who meets all of the following conditions:
1. Has a charge for use greater than the ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to OCSD; and
2. Discharges waste other than sanitary; and
3. Is not otherwise required to obtain a Class I permit.
3.1
Wastehauler Permits
Wastehauler permits are issued to those users who are engaged in vehicular transport and subsequent
disposal of biodegradable waste into OCSD's system. Wastehauler permittees dispose of septic
tank/cesspool, restaurant grease trap, and portable toilet wastes at OCSD's dedicated disposal facility
located at Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. The discharge of industrial wastewater by any
wastehauler is prohibited unless written authorization from OCSD has been obtained.
Special Purpose Permits
Special Purpose permits are issued to dischargers for the purpose of discharging groundwater, surface
run-off, subsurface drainage, or unpolluted water directly or indirectly to OCSD's facilities when no
alternative method of disposal is reasonably available, or to mitigate an environmental risk or health
hazard. This presently includes groundwater remediation and construction dewatering projects.
Urban Runoff Permits
Urban Runoff is contaminated water that is the result of daily activities such as over-irrigating landscape,
cleaning streets and sidewalks,and washing cars. OCSD enforces wastewater discharge limits by issuing
permits to urban runoff dischargers to ensure that the quality of wastewater does not compromise OCSD's
facilities.
FOG (Fats, Oil, and Grease) Permits
OCSD is administering the local FOG Program for Food Service Establishments (FSEs)that discharge
directly to OCSD owned sewer pipelines. Ordinance OCSD-25 provides for the establishment of the FOG
program and the enforcement of program requirements by OCSD's Resource Protection Division. The
goal of the program is to eliminate Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs) which emanate from FSEs.
Additional information can be found in Chapter 9.
Discharge Certifications
A Discharge Certification may be issued to non-categorical industries that generate wastewater containing
pollutants of concern and have the potential for violating any pretreatment standard or requirement. Zero
Discharge Certifications are issued to those industries that have operations subject to a federal category
regulated by the EPA, but do not discharge industrial wastewater generated from these operations to the
sewer.
3.3 PERMIT ISSUANCE
During FY 2018/19,the pretreatment program managed a total of 555 active permits/certifications. Fifty-
two(52) permits were listed as void or expired during the fiscal year(most due to ownership, location, or
class changes and subsequent re-issuances), including 20 Class I permits,19 special purpose discharge
permits, 1 Class 2 permit, 10 wastehauler permits, and 2 zero discharge certifications. Thirty-nine (39)
new permits were issued, including 22 Class I permits, 1 Class 2 permit, 2 wastehauler permits, and 14
special purpose discharge permits. Of the 19 special purpose discharge permits that were voided/expired,
and the 14 newly issued special purpose discharge permits, 7 of these were short-term issuances, i.e.
new and void during the same reporting period.
This level of permit activity represents no significant change compared to the total number of active
permits at the end of the previous fiscal year. Of the 339 Class I permits(significant industrial users), 188
were subject to Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards, and the other 151 industrial permits (non-
categorical) were issued to non-categorical users that discharge 25,000 gallons per day or more of
3.2
process water,or have a reasonable potential for adversely affecting OCSD's plant operations,or have a
reasonable potential to violate any pretreatment standard or requirement.
3.3.1 Identification of New Permittees
OCSD checks various sources for companies that may be subject to Federal Categorical Standards or
local limits. Wastewater permits are issued to those businesses as required. OCSD obtains new
business information from the following:
• City Business Licensing Departments
• Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's permit database
• OCSD Engineering Department connection permits
• OCSD Finance Department new sewer service referrals
• OC Register newspaper
• Agency referrals during Strike Force meetings
• Currently permitted industries
Up until recently,the majority of new permittees had been identified by OCSD field inspectors during the
course of inspecting existing permittees,and when following up on new industries that move into a former
permittee's company location. During FY 2017/18, staff worked with all OCSD member agencies and set
up an ongoing program to collect quarterly data on all new and renewed business licenses. Over 50,000
business records were received and a more detailed review was conducted on over 2,000 facilities,which
resulted in planned inspections for nearly 200 facilities to confirm whether a control mechanism needs to
be issued. The initial effort also included a plan for OCSD to identify industrial dischargers from county
and unincorporated areas where business licenses are not issued. These areas require physical searches
to ensure that OCSD's entire service area is covered to comply with EPA's requirements for
comprehensive Industrial Waste Survey.
3.4 DISCHARGE LIMITS
3.4.1 Industrial
In 1976, OCSD established discharge limits for specific pollutants. These limits became increasingly
restrictive over a three-phased implementation period designed to give industry adequate time to comply
with the more stringent standards. The limits were adopted by OCSD's Boards of Directors in 1976 and
were published in OCSD's Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities (Ordinance). New
concentration limits were adopted in the revised Ordinance, which became effective July 1, 1983.
On September 8, 1989,the Boards of Directors adopted a new ordinance entitled Wastewater Discharge
Regulations which contained essentially the same concentration limits as the previous Ordinance.
Revisions included the creation of a specific limit of 0.1 milligrams per liter (mg/L) for polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCB), a limit of 0.1 mg/L for pesticides, and specific limits for wastehaulers. It also included
specific discharge limits for biochemical oxygen demand(BOD);the daily maximum BOD limit was 15,000
pounds per day(lb/day). These BOD limits were established to prevent pass-through and interference.
The 1989 Ordinance was subsequently revised in February 1992, July 1998, July 2007, July 2008 and
October 2009, but with no change to the local discharge limits. Since the implementation of the Federal
Categorical Standards in April 1984, OCSD applies either the Federal Categorical Standards or OCSD's
local discharge limits, whichever are more stringent. In 2016, OCSD completed a local limits study and
revised its Ordinance, per EPA audit findings, effective July 1, 2016. The 2016 Ordinance removed the
3.3
numeric BOD concentration limit, removed the cyanide amenable and total toxic organic limits, revised
chromium and silver limits,and added 1,4-dioxane, molybdenum,and selenium limits. As of this reporting
period, these limits are still in effect and shown in Table 3.1.
TABLE 3.1 OCSD's Maximum Allowable Discharge Limits in Milligrams Per Liter(mg/L)
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Constituent Limit(mg/L) Constituent Limit(mg/L)
1,4-Dioxane 1.0 Nickel 10.0
Arsenic 2.0 Oil and Grease of Mineral 100.0
or Petroleum Origin
Cadmium 1.0 Pesticides 0.01
Chromium (Total) 20.0 PolychlorinaatteBd)Biphenyls 0.01
Copper 3.0 Selenium 3.9
Cyanide (Total) 5.0 Silver 15.0
Lead 2.0 Sulfide (Dissolved) 0.5
Mercury 0.03 Sulfide (Total) 5.0
Molybdenum 2.3 Zinc 10.0
3.4.2 Wastehaulers
After evaluating reference materials from the EPA and laboratory results from wastehauler samples taken
by OCSD, pollutant limits were established for wastehaulers discharging domestic waste that express the
maximum expected heavy metal concentrations from domestic wastes found in septic tank/cesspool
wastes. These limits are shown in Table 3.2.
TABLE 3.2 OCSD's Maximum Allowable Discharge Limits in Milligrams Per Liter(mg/L)
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Maximum Allowable Discharge Limits for Wastehaulers
Discharging Domestic Septage to the OCSD Wastehauler Station
Constituent Limit (mg/L)
Cadmium 1.0
Chromium 35.0
Copper 25.0
Lead 10.0
Nickel 10.0
Zinc 50.0
3.4
3.5 ESTABLISHING MASS EMISSION RATES (MER)
OCSD uses a dual approach to regulating wastewater constituents. To encourage water conservation,
waste minimization, and recycling; to limit the total mass of pollutants that enter the treatment facilities;
and to deter facilities from achieving compliance through dilution; most Class 1 permits are issued both
concentration-based limits and mass emission limits. For concentration limits, OCSD applies either the
Federal Categorical Standards or OCSD's local discharge limits(shown in Table 3.1),whichever are more
stringent. Allowable mass emission rates are calculated using the applicable concentration limits in
combination with an industry's three-year average wastewater flow(referred to as a flow base rate). The
flow base rate is determined at the time a permit is initially issued or reissued.
The volume of wastewater used in establishing a permittee's limits is based on water meter information or
additional reports submitted to OCSD. Unless additional water losses can be substantiated, or another
batch, process, or effluent meter measurement device is in place, 95% of the influent city water meter
reading is considered to be discharged to the sewer. The remaining 5% is a standard allowance for
losses in process,evaporation,and landscape use. An allowance for domestic waste is computed based
on a daily usage rate of 25 gallons per employee per 8-hour shift. If there is documentation showing other
water losses, such as product water loss or boiler loss,that are greater than the standard 5%deduction,
then adjustments can be made to accommodate these losses. If water conservation beyond normal
industrial practice takes place, the permitted flow may be adjusted to account for water conservation
and/or water recycling.
The user's annual average industrial wastewater discharge,calculated as described above, is divided by
the number of operational discharge days per year to yield the net discharge in gallons per day. Because
the mass limit(expressed in Ibs/day)provides a pollutant"ceiling,"the user is prevented from introducing
large quantities of water in an attempt to dilute concentrations to meet categorical requirements. If a
discharger wishes to increase production by expanding capacity or increasing the number of hours
worked, pretreatment capabilities must be increased to meet future requirements and ensure long-term
compliance with the applicable limits.
If a permittee exceeds the MER or concentration discharge limits,the permittee is subject to enforcement
action(s) in accordance with OCSD's Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance and Enforcement
Response Plan, which may include administrative penalties.
3.5
chapter 4
INSPECTION, SAMPLING, COMPLIANCE,
ENFORCEMENT
Introduction
Routine Sampling and Inspection
Non-Routine Sampling and Inspection
Orange County Hazardous Materials Strike Force and Joint Agency Inspections
Industrial Compliance Status with Discharge Limits
Enforcement Activities
Enforcement Summary
chapter 4
INSPECTION, SAMPLING, COMPLIANCE, & ENFORCEMENT
4.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter details the inspection,sampling,and enforcement activities of the Orange County Sanitation
District (OCSD) Industrial Pretreatment Program for FY 2018/19.
The goal of OCSD's Industrial Pretreatment Program is to ensure that dischargers maintain compliance
with Federal Pretreatment Standards and OCSD's Wastewater Discharge Regulations(Ordinance)and
discharge limits through monitoring and verification, in addition to controlling and reducing industrial
pollutants.
An individual industrial discharge status summary of all Class I permittees is provided in the Monitoring
and Compliance Status Report for FY 2018/19 (Appendix A of this report). The following sections
describe OCSD's inspection, monitoring and enforcement efforts and summarize permittees'compliance
with EPA Categorical Standards and OCSD's local limits.
4.2 ROUTINE INSPECTION AND SAMPLING
OCSD's Source Control Inspection group consists of 1 Supervisor, 1 Principal Environmental Specialist, 1
Lead Inspector, 9 Inspectors,3 Technicians,and 1 Administrative Assistant. Inspectors provide a visible
presence at industrial facilities and deter non-compliant conduct through on-site sampling and inspections.
The Inspectors perform inspections at each permittee's facility at least once per calendar quarter.
Discharge samples are taken during each inspection for all pertinent regulated constituents based on
permit requirements.
Inspections may include an evaluation of manufacturing plant processes and pretreatment equipment to
observe and discuss changes; verification of waste manifests and other waste disposal documents;
measurement of industrial wastewater flows; field testing and sample collection of wastewater; and a
review of regulations, policies, and procedures for the implementation of the pretreatment program.
Composite samples of a permittee's discharge are collected using automatic samplers and are time-
composited over a 24-hour period. EPA sampling guidelines are used by the Source Control Inspectors
for collecting and preserving samples. In conjunction with each Inspector's on-site observations, the
results of laboratory analyses are used to verify compliance status, help disclose potential operational and
housekeeping problems, evaluate the adequacy of pretreatment systems, and detect new sources of
regulated substances. Grab samples are collected for the determination of compliance with TTOs,
cyanides, Oil and Grease and pH.
During FY 2018/19, OCSD staff conducted 1,362 inspections and collected 3,235 samples. Compared to
last fiscal year, the number of conducted inspections increased this year by 14% and the number of
samples collected decreased by 5%.
4.1
TABLE 4.1 Summary of Inspections, Sampling, and Laboratory Analyses,
Fiscal Years 2014-19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Years
Action/Status 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-2018 2018-2019
Inspections* 1,654 1,609 1,344 1,192 1,362
Samples Collected 3,933 2,252 2,263 3,406 3,235
* Site visits to facilities to address compliance.
4.3 NON-ROUTINE SAMPLING AND INSPECTION
OCSD Source Control Inspection staff perform field duties beyond routine sampling and inspection, as
summarized below:
• Enforcement inspections are performed in response to compliance problems and typically involve
close cooperation with the permittee to identify and correct deficiencies. Source Control Inspectors
resample noncompliant industries within 30 days from the date the violation is issued and submit
compliance inspection reports to document corrective measures taken and to support enforcement
actions.
• Inspectors participate in multi-agency operations such as warrant inspections and environmental
audits. Cross-training with other agencies enables Inspectors to recognize potential problems in other
regulatory areas such as air quality and hazardous waste.
• Chronic violators are subject to increased monitoring and inspection activity, which may include
extended periods of on-site sampling.
• Source Control Inspectors perform routine sampling for cyanide at facilities that have cyanide
treatment systems on site. The sampling occurs at the end of cyanide treatment or at the end of pipe,
just prior to discharge. The purpose of this sampling is to confirm that all cyanide-bearing wastewater
is treated.
• Random sampling throughout the collection system is performed in areas where there is an increased
potential for illegal dumping by industries. These sampling events are generally precursors to
downstream monitoring projects (described in Section 4.3.1)when illicit discharging is suspected.
• Field support is provided to the Non-Industrial Source Control (NISC) team within the Resource
Protection Division in support of their ongoing programs including quarterly sampling at 21 dry-
weather urban runoff diversions and inspections at 48 dry-cleaners.
• On a monthly basis, Source Control Inspection staff collect composite samples on each of OCSD's
twelve trunklines at both OCSD Plants for several days to a week. This monitoring allows OCSD to
identify any potential problems on individual trunk lines, as well as to study the correlation between
our influent and our effluent and biosolids.
4.3.1 Downstream Sampling
Covert sampling is conducted downstream of an industry to verify continued discharge compliance or to
identify illicit discharges. Sampling is conducted both upstream and downstream in order to isolate the
4.2
industry's discharge. This sampling is performed in manhole structures in local sewer systems over the
course of several days.
Three downstream monitoring events were conducted during the period from July 1, 2018 through
June 30, 2019. Industries investigated were Brasstech, Inc., Superior Plating and Advance Tech
Plating, Inc.
4.4 ORANGE COUNTY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STRIKE FORCE
(STRIKE FORCE) AND JOINT AGENCY INSPECTIONS
The Orange County Strike Force is comprised of state, county, city, and other local agencies capable of
identifying, investigating, and prosecuting dischargers of hazardous materials to the environment. The
initial goals of the Strike Force were to define the roles and responsibilities of each participating agency;
establish the scope of the cases to be handled; emphasize cooperative identification, investigation, and
prosecution of violators; and develop protocols among all participating agencies to create a coordinated
enforcement system. An overall protocol was adopted by the Orange County Board of Supervisors in
June 1988. The Orange County District Attorney's Office conducts monthly Strike Force meetings to
discuss investigative strategies, ongoing investigations/cases, and identification of potential new cases.
OCSD's staff spent approximately 140 hours assisting the Strike Force in FY 2018/19 by attending
meetings and conducting fieldwork in support of Strike Force activities.
OCSD participates in joint agency inspections of industries suspected of violating hazardous waste and
sewer discharge regulations. This cooperative effort involves other agencies such as the Orange County
Health Care Agency and the Orange County's District Attorney's office, responsible for environmental
management and citizen safety. These inspections aid in correcting existing and potential discharge
problems and alerted each of the participating agencies to the concerns of the other cooperating agencies.
4.5 INDUSTRIAL COMPLIANCE STATUS WITH DISCHARGE LIMITS
OCSD monitors and evaluates the compliance status of all regulated industries to determine the
applicability of additional enforcement actions. Analytical monitoring results are reviewed by the source
control supervisor, and limit exceedances are investigated and re-sampled to determine if the cause is a
chronic problem. Additionally, should the inspectors identify any deficiencies in an industry's process
and/or discharge system, the industry is notified of the situation, findings are documented in inspection
reports and discussed with permit engineers, and corrective measures as required are communicated to
the industry to be implemented. A summary of the significant industrial users' compliance status for FY
2018/19 is shown in Appendix A.
4.5.1 Industries in Significant Noncompliance (SNC)
At the end of each quarter, OCSD is required to evaluate their industrial user's compliance status using a
six-month time frame. Under this system, each industrial user is evaluated for SNC four times during the
year,and the total evaluation period covers 15 months(i.e., beginning with the last quarter of the previous
pretreatment year through the end of the current year). OCSD is required to annually publish in the local
newspaper all industrial users that have been identified as SNC during the past year when the SNC
criteria were met during any of the previous four quarters. If a facility has been determined to be in SNC
based solely on violations which occurred in the first quarter of the 15-month evaluation (i.e., the last
quarter of the previous pretreatment year)and the facility has demonstrated consistent compliance in the
subsequent four quarters,then OCSD is not required to publish the Industrial User(IU)in the newspaper if
the IU was published in the previous year for the same violations.
As of June 30, 2019,of the active 339 Class I permittees,there were 15(4%)that had been classified as
SNC; 9 of these were categorical industries,and 6 were non-categorical. An industry was determined to
4.3
be in SNC if it incurred a violation that met one or more of the criteria listed below as provided in 40 CFR,
Part 403.
• Chronic violations of discharge limits are defined as those in which 66% or more of all
measurements taken during a six-month period exceed(by any magnitude)the daily maximum or
the average limits for the same pollutant.
• Acute violations of discharge limits are defined as those in which 33% or more of all
measurements taken during a six-month period constitute a Technical Review Criteria violation of
the daily maximum or the average limits.
• Any other violation of a pretreatment effluent limit that has caused,either alone or in combination
with other discharges, interference or pass through.
• Any discharge of a pollutant that has caused imminent endangerment to human health,welfare,
or the environment; or has resulted in OCSD's exercise of its emergency authorities.
• Failure to meet within 90 days after the scheduled date of a compliance schedule milestone
contained in an enforcement order for starting construction, completing construction, or for
attaining final compliance.
• Failure to provide required reports including, but not limited to, periodic self-monitoring reports
and reports with compliance schedules within 45 days of the due date.
• Failure to accurately report noncompliance with discharge limits or any other requirements
applicable to the user pursuant to OCSD's Ordinance.
• Any other violation or group of violations that will adversely affect the operation or implementation
of OCSD's pretreatment program.
A summary of the permittees in SNC is presented in Table 4.2. The SNC list was published in the October
21, 2019 issue of The Orange County Register; a copy of the announcement is presented in Appendix E.
4.4
TABLE 4.2 Summary of Companies in Significant Noncompliance (SNC), Fiscal Year 2018-19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Company Name Permit Category City
No.
Industries SNC Due to Discharge Violations
Aluminum Forming, Metal
Arconic Global Fasteners& Rings, Inc. 1-021081 Finishing, Nonferrous Metals Fullerton
Forming And Metal Powders
Aluminum Forming, Metal
Bristol Industries 1-021226 Finishing, Nonferrous Metals Brea
Forming And Metal Powders
Catalina Cylinders,A Div. of APP 1-031021 Aluminum Forming Garden Grove
Independent Forge Company 1-021401 Aluminum Forming Orange
Kenlen Specialities, Inc. 1-021171 Metal Finishing Fountain Valley
Patio and Door Outlet, Inc. 1-521783 Metal Finishing Orange
Prima-Tex Industries Inc. 1-031036 OCSD Local Limits Buena Park
Republic Waste Services 1-521827 OCSD Local Limits Anaheim
Star Manufacturing LLC, dba Commercial 1-600653 OCSD Local Limits Orange
Metal Forming
Industries SNC Due to Reporting Violations
Active Plating, Inc. 1-011115 Metal Finishing Santa Ana
Coastline Metal Finishing Corp.,A Division 1-600708 Metal Finishing Garden Grove
of Valence Surface Technologies
Hartwell Corporation 1-021381 OCSD Local Limits Placentia
JD Processing, Inc. 1-511407 Metal Finishing Santa Ana
Kraft Heinz Company 1-071056 OCSD Local Limits Irvine
National Construction Rentals 1-600652 OCSD Local Limits Santa Ana
4.6 ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES
During FY 2018/19, OCSD initiated or continued various enforcement actions to bring industries into
compliance. This section describes the types of enforcement actions taken against noncompliant
significant industrial users. In addition, Appendix J shows a listing of pretreatment equipment that has
been installed by OCSD's permittees.
As provided in the Ordinance and Enforcement Response Plan (ERP), OCSD has a broad range of
enforcement mechanisms available, including issuing noncompliance sampling fees, administrative
penalties, Notices of Violation, compliance letters, Probation Orders, and Enforcement Compliance
4.5
Schedule Agreements (ECSA); and instituting Emergency Suspension Orders, Permit Suspension, and
Permit Revocation Orders.
OCSD's enforcement program is designed to bring noncompliant industries back into compliance with
federal pretreatment standards and OCSD's local discharge limits. If permittees violate a discharge limit,
enforcement action is initiated. This includes the assessment and issuance of noncompliance sampling
fees, and requiring the permittee to conduct additional sampling along with OCSD conducting additional
sampling. Subsequent noncompliance may result in issuing an order/compliance requirement letter
detailing corrective measures, requiring the installation of additional pretreatment equipment,requiring the
implementation of pollution prevention measures, issuing Emergency Suspension Orders,or suspending
or revoking the discharge permit.
4.6.1 Compliance Inspections
In order to identify and assess any noncompliance problems, corrective actions, and the progress of
permittees operating under the terms of a Probation Order, Enforcement Compliance Schedule
Agreement (ECSA), or any other enforcement action, an OCSD pretreatment program engineer and
inspector conduct special compliance inspections.
During FY 2018/19 OCSD conducted sixty-nine (69) compliance inspections.
4.6.2 Compliance Meetings
Compliance meetings are held as a result of the permittee's inability to achieve compliance with discharge
requirements or to comply with OCSD's Ordinance. The meetings are held with company representatives
to discuss the discharge problems and proposed long-term solutions.
During FY 2018/19, OCSD conducted fifteen (15) compliance meetings.
4.6.3 Compliance Requirement Letters
Compliance requirement letters are issued to require a permittee to comply with a specific condition of the
permit and/or Ordinance,or to notify the permittee of an enforcement in accordance with the Enforcement
Response Plan, such as a compliance meeting.
During FY 2018/19, OCSD issued twenty-six (26) compliance requirement letters.
4.6.4 Order to Cease/Terminate Non-Compliance/Discharge
Orders are issued where a permittee is continually non-compliant or has committed one or more
significant violations of the permit and/or Ordinance. The Order requires a permittee to comply with a
specific condition of the permit and/or Ordinance and may notify the permittee of escalated enforcement in
accordance with the Enforcement Response Plan, such as a compliance meeting.
During FY 2018/19, OCSD issued ten (10) orders.
4.6.5 Notices of Violation — Noncompliance Fees, Penalties
A Notice of Violation (NOV) is a written notification from OCSD that references findings from recent
sampling programs and indicates that specific violations of the permittees'discharge limits have occurred.
The NOV is usually accompanied by non-compliance sampling and/or processing fees. The NOV
instructs the permittee to take immediate action to correct the problem.
4.6
During FY 2018/19, ninety-six (96) notices of violations were sent to sixty-three (63) significant
industrial users.
When a permittee violates its permit limits or conditions, noncompliance fees are assessed at rates that
have been adopted by OCSD's Board of Directors. For FY 2018/19, non-compliance fees, penalties,
settlements, interest, and judgments totaling$117,128 were issued to SIUs(for details see Appendix D).
Fees also include those from SNC permittees whose names were published in the local newspaper, and
for individual self-monitoring non-compliance fees.
4.6.6 Probation Orders
Upon determination that a permittee is in non-compliance with the terms and conditions specified in its
permit or any provision of OCSD's Ordinance, OCSD may issue a Probation Order. The Probation Order
contains conditions, requirements, and a compliance schedule. The term of a Probation Order does not
exceed ninety(90)days. The permittee is required to comply with all conditions and requirements within
the time specified, including the submittal of information pertaining to waste source characterizations,
pretreatment modifications,and waste minimization alternatives;and the performance of accelerated self-
monitoring.
During FY 2018/19, OCSD issued three (3) probation orders.
4.6.7 Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement
An Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement(ECSA) is an agreement between the permittee and
OCSD specifying that pretreatment equipment is installed or pollution prevention measures are
implemented by the permittee within a scheduled time period,and that the permittee remains in consistent
compliance during the term of the ECSA. The ECSA contains terms and conditions by which the
permittee must operate and specifies dates for construction or acquiring and installing the pretreatment
equipment and/or implementing waste minimization to achieve compliance. During the ECSA, inspection
and sampling of the facilities are conducted monthly by OCSD's inspectors to verify that all terms and
conditions of the ECSA are met. In addition, the permittee is required to perform accelerated and
extended self-monitoring.
During FY 2018/19, OCSD did not issue any enforcement compliance schedule agreement.
4.6.8 Regulatory Compliance Schedule Agreement
Subsequent to the issuance of an Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit to an industrial user, federal
Categorical Pretreatment Standards may be adopted or revised by the EPA,or OCSD may enact revised
discharge limits. If the General Manager,or his or her designee,determines that a permittee would not be
in compliance with the newly adopted or revised limits, the permittee may be required to enter into a
Regulatory Compliance Schedule Agreement(RCSA)with OCSD. The terms and conditions of a RCSA
require the permittee to achieve compliance with all new standards by a specific date. RCSAs have a
maximum term of two-hundred-and-seventy (270) days.
The issuance of a RCSA may contain terms and conditions including but not limited to requirements for
installation of pretreatment equipment and facilities, submittal of drawings or reports,waste minimization
practices,or other provisions to ensure compliance with OCSD's Ordinance. While the RCSA is in effect,
any discharge by the permittee in violation of the RCSA will require payment of non-compliance sampling
fees in accordance with Article 6 of OCSD's Ordinance.
During FY 2018/19, OCSD did not issue any regulatory compliance schedule agreements.
4.7
4.6.9 Administrative Complaints, Penalties, and Settlement Agreements
Pursuant to the authority of California Government Code Section 54740.5, OCSD may issue
administrative complaints and penalties against the responsible officer or owner of any company that
violates any permit condition or effluent limit. In accordance with an OCSD Board of Directors Resolution,
OCSD may also negotiate a Settlement Agreement in lieu of an administrative compliant,which includes
corrective actions on the part of the industry and reduced administrative penalties.
During FY 2018/19, OCSD issued two (2) administrative penalties in the form of settlement
agreements, totaling $71,000.00, including interest and processing fees.
4.6.10 Permit Suspensions
When OCSD believes that grounds exist for permit suspension, the permittee is notified in writing of the
reasons for permit suspension and the date of the permit suspension hearing. At the hearing,OCSD staff
and the permittee are provided the opportunity to present evidence to a designated hearing officer. After
the conclusion of the hearing,a written determination is made by the hearing officer. Upon issuance of a
suspension order,the permittee must cease all discharges to the sewerforthe duration of the suspension.
During FY 2018/19, OCSD did not issue any permit suspensions.
4.6.11 Permit Revocations
The last recourse in the chain of administrative enforcement provisions is permit revocation. A permittee
with a critical noncompliance record or who has failed to pay fees and charges is notified in writing of the
reasons for permit revocation and the date of the permit revocation hearing. At the hearing, OCSD staff
and the permittee are provided the opportunity to present evidence to a designated hearing officer. After
the conclusion of the hearing,the hearing officer makes a determination if permit revocation is warranted,
and provides a written report to the General Manager for final determination. Should the General Manager
determine that the noncompliance record is substantial,revocation of the industrial waste discharge permit
and loss of sewer discharge privileges may result.
During FY 2018/19, OCSD did not issue any permit revocations.
4.6.12 Emergency Suspension Order
Pursuant to Section 614 of OCSD's Wastewater Discharge Regulations,an Emergency Suspension Order
may be ordered to stop an actual or impending discharge which presents or may present an imminent or
substantial endangerment to the health and welfare of persons, or to the environment, or may cause
interference to OCSD's sewerage facilities, or may cause OCSD to violate any state or federal law or
regulation.
During FY 2018/19, OCSD did not issue any emergency suspension orders.
4.6.13 Civil/Criminal Complaints
When a permittee intentionally or negligently violates any provision of the Ordinance,permit conditions,or
discharge limits, OCSD may petition to the Superior Court for the issuance of a preliminary or permanent
restraining order. In addition, OCSD can petition the Court to impose,assess,and recover civil penalties
for each day that violation occurs or seek criminal penalties for illegal disposal in accordance with OCSD's
Ordinance.
OCSD did not file any civil or criminal complaints during FY 2018/19.
4.8
4.7 ENFORCEMENT SUMMARY
This section summarizes various enforcement actions conducted for permittees during FY 2018/19.
Potential enforcement actions include permit revocations, permit suspensions, compliance inspections,
compliance meetings, probation orders, enforcement compliance schedule agreements (ECSA), and
orders to cease, among others.
A & G Electropolish (Permit No.1-531422)
A & G Electropolish (A & G) is a job shop metal finishing facility. A & G performs
electropolishing of stainless steel parts for all applications from aerospace to food
production. A & G's operations include fabrication with general machining operations,
bead blasting, and other dry processes. Wastewater is generated from wet process
operations, which include deburring, passivation, and electropolishing. Wastewater is
collected in a below grade sump and pumped to the batch treatment tank prior to
discharge to the sewer. Batch treatment at A & G consists of pH adjustment utilizing
caustic beads, settling, and filter pressing solids with the filtrate pH adjusted with
phosphoric acid.
In November 2017, OCSD issued an Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges to A&G
for unauthorized hauling of wastewater generated in A&G's mobile passivation service
conducted at various third-party sites, with the purpose of discharging through the facility
sewer connection under A& G's discharge permit. A& G agreed to cease this operation
immediately. In May 2018, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection to discuss
delinquent permit required items, which include submittal of facility drawings and a slug
discharge control plan, and hard plumbing of certain fixtures. During the inspection,
OCSD confirmed that the company is no longer conducting mobile passivation.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On July 11, 2018, OCSD issued a Compliance Requirement Letter. On August 22,
2018, OCSD conducted another Compliance Inspection to discuss the details of the
letter. On September 13, 2018, OCSD conducted a follow-up Compliance Inspection to
verify hard plumbing installation. A & G submitted required documents, including
updated drawings and made corrections to plumbing configurations prior to the deadline
of September 24, 2018. On December 3, 2018, OCSD conducted a final Compliance
Inspection to confirm completion of all corrective actions.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
A & G had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to
monitor A & G's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
A & R Powder Coating, Inc. (Permit No. 1-021088)
A & R Powder Coating, Inc. (A & R) performs powder coating and painting. Cold rolled
4.9
steel and aluminum parts are brought in by outside customers. The parts are processed
through an iron phosphate conversion coating line and then heated briefly in an oven to
dry off residual moisture prior to spray painting or powder coating per customer
requirements. A & R employs a batch holding tank to store wastewater from the iron
phosphate wash line. The batch is reportedly allowed to sit overnight and checked for
zinc concentration with a Hach field test kit periodically, with the results entered onto a
logbook. After testing and inspection, the tank is drained the next morning into a small
three-stage clarifier. The holding tank is opaque and has a conical bottom for ease of
inspection and solids removal, and a cartridge filter system is installed on the inlet
plumbing line to remove solids during transfer of the rinse water from the wash line.
January 1 —June 30, 2019
On June 25, 2019, A& R Powder Coating (A& R) had a molybdenum violation. OCSD
will issue a Notice of Violation and conduct a Compliance Inspection to investigate the
violation during the next quarter.
Accurate Circuit Engineering (Permit No. 1-011138)
Accurate Circuit Engineering (Accurate) is a printed circuit board (PCB) manufacturer
with an in-house design and engineering team, as well as large scale manufacturing
operations. Accurate manufactures various types of PCBs, including rigid single sided,
rigid double-sided, and rigid multilayer. The effluent discharge at Accurate is primarily
generated by developing operations, etching, scrubbing via hyoki, rinses, and other
treated process solutions from alkaline cleaning, Co-bra bond micro-etch, black oxide
line, electroless copper and electrolytic copper plating, screen wash booths, and cross-
sectional grinding wastewater. Pretreatment consists of anion and cation ion exchange
and hydroxide precipitation.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On April 25, 2019, Accurate had a silver violation, for which a Notice of Violation was
issued on May 13, 2019. In addition, Accurate had copper and silver monthly average
discharge limit violations in the month of April 2019. On May 29, 2019, OCSD
conducted a Compliance Inspection during which it was determined that the silver
recovery unit was not operating properly and Accurate was not verifying silver
compliance in batch treatment prior to discharge. Accurate has decided to wastehaul all
silver developer wastewater moving forward.
OCSD will continue to monitor Accurate's discharge and compliance status on a
quarterly basis.
Active Plating, Inc. (Permit No. 1-011115)
Active Plating, Inc. (Active Plating) is a job shop metal finishing facility. Active Plating
4.10
performs zinc plating with clear and gold chromate conversion coating on steel, and
chemfilm operations on aluminum parts. Parts are generally used in electronics or
computer applications. Wastewater is segregated between hexavalent chrome bearing
operations and other metal-bearing/alkaline wastestreams. Pretreatment consists of
chromium reduction, hydroxide precipitation, with settling and flocculation in two parallel
clarification tanks. Active Plating has pH and ORP probes connected to an advanced
programmable logic controller which automates the treatment system.
In April 2018, Active Plating had a zinc violation, and was issued a Notice of Violation.
In May 2018, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection during which the pH and ORP
probes were found not operating properly. Also noted during the inspection was that
Active Plating periodically takes one of the clarification tanks off-line for batch treatment
or solids removal. When this occurs, floc carry-over into the sample point becomes an
issue due to reduced treatment capacity. In June 2018, OCSD held a Compliance
Meeting with Active Plating during which the company was required to come up with a
long-term solution for implementing effective process controls and treatment when one
clarification tank is offline. The company was also required to submit detailed
pretreatment system drawings and an updated facility plot plan.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On October 23, 2018, Active Plating had another zinc violation, for which a Notice of
Violation was issued on November 20, 2018. On December 12, 2018, OCSD
conducted a Compliance Inspection during which treatment concerns involving hydraulic
capacity of the system were identified. On December 31, 2018, OCSD issued a
Compliance Requirements Letter to Active Plating.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On January 31, 2019, OCSD held a Compliance Meeting with Active to discuss
corrective actions. On April 17, 2019, OCSD issued a Probation Order providing
deadlines for corrective actions. On June 25, 2019, OCSD issued another Compliance
Requirement Letter extending Probation Order deadlines.
Active Plating had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue
to monitor Active Plating's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Advance Tech Plating, Inc. (Permit No. 1-021389)
Advance Tech Plating, Inc. (ATP) is a job shop metal finishing facility. The facility
performs anodizing and passivation on steel and aluminum parts and some
copper/brass parts. Operations at ATP start with precleaning and etching, then
deoxidizing with muriatic acid and anodizing with sulfuric acid, followed by chem filming
and dye coloring per customer specification. To protect the dyed surface, the parts are
dipped in a clear anoseal followed by final rinsing and drying. Majority of the wastewater
4.11
is generated from the rinsing operations. ATP operates a continuous and a batch
pretreatment system which consists of chrome reduction, pH adjustment, flocculation,
metal precipitation and clarification. ATP utilizes a filter press for sludge dewatering.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On May 6, 2019, ATP had major zinc, copper, nickel and pH violations. On May 7,
2019, ATP had another zinc violation. In addition, ATP had zinc, copper, and nickel
monthly average limit violations in the month of May 2019. On May 14, 2019, OCSD
conducted a Compliance Inspection during which ATP was directed to stop
noncompliant discharges and to determine the cause of the violations. On May 16, 2019,
OCSD issued ATP two Notices of Violation along with an Order to Cease Noncompliant
Discharges due to the gravity of the violations. On May 22, 2019, ATP submitted a
response letter indicating that a clogged discharge tube on the sodium hydroxide
metering pump led to a low pH and, hence, incomplete treatment of metals. ATP's
corrective actions included installation of a low pH alarm and a recirculation line, which
would allow ATP to recirculate noncompliant wastewater back into the treatment tanks.
On June 13, 2019, OCSD issued a Compliance Requirement Letter directing ATP to
attend a Compliance Meeting to discuss the violations. On June 26, 2019, OCSD held
the Compliance Meeting with ATP during which the company was directed to take the
following additional corrective measures: automating the recirculation line with low pH,
having a qualified operator present during all discharge hours, maintaining the
pretreatment tanks, good housekeeping, and performing an hydraulic evaluation of the
pretreatment system.
OCSD will issue a Notice of Violation for the May 2019 monthly violations, as well as a
Compliance Requirement Letter to reiterate OCSD's additional requirements and give
ATP a deadline for completing them, during the next quarter.
Alliance Medical Products, Inc. (Permit No. 1-541182)
Alliance Medical Products, Inc. (Alliance) is a manufacturer of medical surgical devices
along with aqueous and injectable drugs which are produced under aseptic conditions.
Medical devices include corneal storage media, ocular implants and other clinical
products. Other manufactured items include medical delivery devices, sterile ointments
and gels, as well as several clinical products that are considered combination products
by the FDA. Wastewater is generated from the aseptic sterile filling process, cleaning of
glassware in the labs, production of steam for the autoclaves, rinsing and cleaning of
manufacturing equipment and tooling, and surplus injection water not utilized during a
production run. The wastewater is discharged to the sewer without any form of
pretreatment.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On June 13, 2019, Alliance had a pH violation. OCSD will issue a Notice of Violation
4.12
and conduct a compliance inspection during the next quarter.
Alloy Die Castinq Co. (Permit No. 1-531437)
Alloy Die Casting Co. (Alloy Die) is a non-ferrous metal former that manufactures diecast
parts to customer's specifications from aluminum and zinc alloys. Molten metal is
injected into a steel die cavity at a controlled temperature under high pressure. Once the
metal part is cooled and has reached sufficient rigidity, the mold opens up and the part is
ejected. After casting, the part will undergo manual pneumatic grinding or belt sanding,
followed by wet deburring to clean, de-flash, and/or provide a surface finish. Alloy Die
uses two batch treatment systems, both of which perform pH adjustment and metals
removal through flocculation, while one performs oil & grease removal as well. The
treated metal-bearing wastestream passes through a filter press, from which the filtrate
is discharged to the sewer. The oil & grease wastestream is sent through an oil/water
separator, from which the separated water is sent to the other batch treatment tank and
the separated oil & grease is wastehauled.
July 1 — December 21, 2018
On September 10, 2018, Alloy Die had a pH violation, for which a Notice of Violation
was issued on October 4, 2018. On October 16,2018, OCSD conducted a Compliance
Inspection during which Alloy die indicated that they could not to determine the direct
cause of violation. Alloy die suspected that a janitorial staff may have dumped a mop
bucket of spent solution containing hydrochloric acid cleaner to the oil/water separator,
unbeknownst to the pretreatment operators. Alloy Die updated their janitorial
procedures to prevent staff from adding mop water to the pretreatment system.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
Allow Die had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue
to monitor Alloy Die's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Alloy Tech Electropolishing, Inc. (Permit No. 1-011036)
Alloy Tech Electropolishing, Inc. (Alloy Tech) is a job shop metal finishing facility. Alloy
Tech performs electropolishing and passivation of stainless steel and titanium parts used
in various applications. Wastewater from rinsing operations is directed to the batch
treatment system where hydroxide precipitation removes heavy metals prior to discharge
to the sewer.
In February 2018, Alloy Tech had a nickel violation, for which a Notice of Violation was
issued. In April 2018, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection during which it was
determined that the violation was an isolated event involving improper heat treatment of
a 17-4 alloy steel. The company agreed to provide a report of all jobs conducted during
4.13
the time the wastewater batch was in noncompliance, and to sample for nickel from each
batch in the following six months to demonstrate that the violation was indeed an
isolated event.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
Alloy Tech's sampling events for nickel during this reporting period were within an
acceptable range and below the permit discharge limit, indicating the nickel violation
may have been an isolated event.
On August 22, 2018, Alloy Tech had a molybdenum violation, for which a Notice of
Violation was issued on September 28, 2018. On November 1, 2018, OCSD
conducted a Compliance Inspection but the source of the molybdenum could not be
identified. During the Compliance Inspection, OCSD discovered that Alloy Tech
conducted a second self-monitoring sampling event on October 22, 2018, which was
not reported to OCSD, and the test result indicated another molybdenum violation.
Hence, the company was informed they must submit all supplemental sampling results.
Alloy Tech agreed to conduct further investigation of the molybdenum violations with a
report to be submitted to OCSD by December 1, 2018, which the company failed to
meet.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
OCSD gave Alloy Tech several opportunities and extensions to provide the required
documents but Alloy Tech has failed to submit them. OCSD will issue a Compliance
Requirement Letter during the next quarter to require Alloy Tech to submit the
documents.
Amerimax Building Products, Inc. (Permit No. 1-021102)
Amerimax Building Products, Inc. (Amerimax) applies coatings on large rolls of
aluminum sheet material (coils). The coils are attached horizontally to a conveyor track
that passes through a heated alkaline pre clean line with spray rinsing, followed by a
low-pressure spray / immersion bath for conversion coating of the aluminum surface
prior to the final paint and coating application. Soft roll squeegees are installed after
each process and rinse module to remove excess solution, then after final paint and
coating application, the coil is run through an infrared curing oven unit before rolling up
and packaging on pallets for shipment to outside customers. Wastewater generated at
Amerimax consists of the rinsewater from the preclean line plus the water quench.
Wastewater treatment at Amerimax consists of a small, three-stage above ground
clarifier at the back of preclean line. After clarification, the wastewater flows out to an
underground sewer connection and cleanout, which is used as the sample point.
4.14
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On May 13, 2019, OCSD issued Amerimax Building Products, Inc. (Amerimax)an Order
to Cease Discharge without a Valid Permit for failure to submit their permit renewal
application at least 30 days prior to the permit expiration. Amerimax continued to
discharge wastewater after the permit expired on May 31, 2019. Therefore, on June 6,
2019, OCSD issued a Second Order to Cease Discharge Without a Valid Permit in
which Amerimax was directed to attend a Compliance Meeting. Amerimax submitted
their permit renewal application on the same day. On June 19, 2019, OCSD held the
Compliance Meeting with Amerimax where OCSD reminded the company of the
consequences and associated penalties for discharging without a valid permit and for
failure to submit required reports in a timely manner. Amerimax explained that the
company's responsible officer and designated signatory had resigned so the application
was forwarded to their headquarters, which is located out of state, and hence the delay.
No further enforcement is necessary at this time.
Anchen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - Goodyear (Permit No. 1-600359)
Anchen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - Goodyear (Anchen) manufactures pharmaceutical
tablets and capsules. The manufacturing process includes weighing, mixing,
granulation, drying, blending, compression, coating, and encapsulation (for capsules).
Wastewater is generated by the cleaning of the equipment used in the production
operations. Anchen does not have a pretreatment system and relies solely on best
management practices in handling solvents used at the facility. Out of the five volatile
organic compounds regulated underthe Pharmaceutical Manufacturing federal category,
acetone is the main constituent of concern at Anchen. When acetone is used in a
formulation, it is also used to clean out residues in the mixing/blending equipment.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On January 9, 2019, Anchen had an acetone violation, for which a Notice of Violation
was issued on February 26, 2019. On March 20, 2019, OCSD conducted a
Compliance Inspection during which Anchen indicated that the company has not been
able to determine the exact cause or source of the exceedance, although it can most
likely be attributed to Anchen staff's failure to follow procedures. On April 8, 2019,
OCSD issued Anchen a Compliance Requirement Letter directing the permittee to
attend a Compliance Meeting. Anchen was issued a Notice of Violation for the January
acetone violation on April 16, 2019. During the Compliance Meeting, which was held on
April 18, 2019, Anchen indicated that they have reminded their staff to follow proper
waste handling procedures. Anchen also reminded their Technical Services and QC
Laboratory group leadership that discharge of chemicals into any building's floor drains,
sinks, and fume hood cup sinks is prohibited. During the meeting, OCSD advised
Anchen that the company may be required to install pretreatment equipment if the facility
continues to be noncompliant. On May 2, 2019, Anchen notified OCSD via an email that
4.15
the main product line at the Goodyear facility has been transferred to Anchen's
Fairbanks facility. On May 13, 2019, OCSD issued a Compliance Requirements Letter
directing Anchen to increase the frequency of acetone self-monitoring from semi-annual
to quarterly, effective June 1, 2019. OCSD revised Anchen's permit to reflect this
increased self-monitoring frequency for acetone.
OCSD will continue to monitor Anchen's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly
basis.
APCT Orange County (Permit No.1-600503)
APCT Orange County(APCT)acquired Cartel Electronics(Permit No 1-521814)in early
2018. APCT is a medium-sized full-service printed circuit board manufacturing facility.
Circuit boards are manufactured from inner-layers through lamination and micro-drilling,
then outer-layer photo-printing, developing, copper and tin pattern plating, and copper
etching/tin stripping followed by soldermask coating, legend screening, and final routing
and electrical testing before packaging and shipment to customers. ACPT also offers
electroless nickel and gold plating for final surface and connector tab coatings.
Wastewater originates from the chemical etching and plating processes and their
associated rinses. During multiple site visits in 2016 and 2017, it was observed that
Cartel had significant concerns with various wastestreams in the shop. These concerns
included frequent bypass of treatment, incorrect plumbing configurations, improper
treatment, improper labeling, unknown piping schemes and wastewater characterization,
and an overall general lack of control of the pretreatment operations. Between the
months of November 2016 and June 2017, Cartel had been issued three Notices of
Violation, an Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges, a Compliance Letter, a
Requirement to Attend a Compliance Meeting, and participate in a Compliance
Inspection.
Between the months of November 2016 and June 2017, Cartel had been issued three
Notices of Violation, an Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges, a Compliance Letter,
and a Requirement to Attend a Compliance Meeting and participate in a Compliance
Inspection. From July to December 2017, Cartel underwent another two compliance
inspections, was issued its Second and Third Cease Orders, and was issued a Notice of
Violation for copper. During the month of September 2017, OCSD conducted a
downstream investigation and monitoring of Cartel's discharge and identified 19 days of
major copper and pH violations with copper concentrations up to 492 mg/L and pH level
as low as 1.30 S.U. Two more compliance meetings were held, during which Cartel
accepted OCSD's offer to enter into a Settlement Agreement to resolve the outstanding
compliance issues. In December 2017, OCSD issued a Settlement Agreement to Cartel
with penalties totaling $80,965.80 (including 6% interest and processing fees associated
with a 12-month payment plan). See Cartel Electronics' (Permit No. 1-521814)
enforcement history on page 4.17 for more details on this reporting period. Due to the
change in ownership that occurred in early 2018, APCT applied for a new permit in
accordance with OCSD's Ordinance. APCT agreed to assume responsibility for Cartel
4.16
Electronics' outstanding enforcement requirements.
In April 2018, an Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSA) was finalized
between APCT and OCSD. The ECSA outlined several requirements and milestones
set forth for the company to implement corrective actions and achieve long-term
compliance with their permit. While under the ECSA and just prior to the permit
suspension from April 30 to May 14, 2018, a downstream sampling event indicated that
the company discharged copper in violation of the permitted discharge limit from April 27
to April 28, 2018.
In May 2018, OCSD conducted an inspection to verify compliance with the terms of the
ECSA and to investigate the copper violations. During the Inspection, the company was
informed of the recent downstream result as well as issues with the maintenance logs for
their batch treatment. An Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges was issued to
APCT afterwards for the downstream copper violations. In June 2018, OCSD held a
compliance meeting with APCT where the company explained that the copper could
have been from changes around the facility in response to the ECSA or it could have
also been from an inadvertent dump from an employee. APCT agreed to sample
consecutively for five days to verify compliance with the copper limit. OCSD issued a
Compliance Requirement Letter to APCT outlining the requirements for multi-day
compliance verification sampling and for submittal of a report for the source of the
downstream copper violation.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
APCT continued to work on improving their compliance by completing the requirements
in the previously issued ECSA. On May 22, 2018 and August 7, 2018, APCT had
further copper violations, which were associated with the start-up of their new treatment
system and for which Notices of Violation were issued on July 12, 2018 and October 1,
2018, respectively. On October 17, 2018, OCSD issued a Compliance Requirement
Letter APCT requiring installation of hard plumbing for certain wastestreams.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On March 18, 2019, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection and confirmed that
APCT had completed all hard plumbing and other corrective actions. On May 10, 2019,
APCT had another copper violation, for which a Notice of Violation was issued on June
10, 2019. The violation was corrected by adjusting the mixer operations associated with
treatment. On May 23, 2019, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection and
resampling during which OCSD verified implementation of the corrective action.
OCSD will continue to monitor APCT's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly
basis.
4.17
Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, Inc. (Permit No. 1-021081)
Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, Inc. (Arconic) manufactures aluminum,titanium, and
steel fasteners. Wastewater-generating processes include cadmium, copper, silver,
nickel and zinc plating, potassium permanganate treatment, cyanide stripping, glycol
lubricant coating, acid stripping, chromate conversion coating, deburring, quenching,
miscellaneous cleaning (mop water), acid/alkaline cleaning, and air scrubbing. Arconic's
continuous pretreatment system consists of pH adjustment, cyanide destruction,
chromium reduction, clarification, and sludge dewatering using a filter press. Separate,
dedicated pretreatment systems are used including electrowinning (for silver plating)and
oil/water separation.
In September 2017, Arconic had a cyanide (amenable) violation. In December 2017,
OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and routine sampling during which the
sampling method/location for cyanide sampling was discussed and the cyanide
treatment system was found to be adequately working. The sampling results showed
compliance. In February 2018, Arconic sent OCSD a letter contesting the cyanide
violation. After a comprehensive review, OCSD concluded that the sample result was
valid, and therefore the violation was upheld.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On February 20, 2019, Arconic had cadmium and molybdenum violations, for which a
Notice of Violation for exceedance of monthly average limits was issued on May 6,2019
and a Notice of Violation was issued for exceedance of instantaneous and daily average
limits on June 10, 2019. On June 19, 2019, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection
and resampling, during which Arconic identified a lubricant product in use at the facility
as the likely source of the molybdenum violation. The resampling results showed
another molybdenum violation.
OCSD will issue a Notice of Violation and conduct another compliance inspection during
the next reporting period.
Aseptic Technology, LLC (Permit No. 1-501002)
Aseptic has operated a beverage and dietary supplements manufacturing operation
located at 24855 Corbit Place, Yorba Linda, CA, 92887, since 2013. Due to a
delinquency in making timely payments for user charges, in January 2016, the OCSD
Board of Directors approved a 12-month payment agreement with Aseptic in the amount
of$199,228.03. Aseptic made timely payments in accordance with the agreement, and
completed the 12-month schedule as of January 2017. However, Aseptic Technology
failed to make payments against quarterly invoices after January 2016; thus
necessitating a second payment agreement request in July 2017 for delinquent amounts
totaling $451,161.54. The second payment agreement also required Aseptic to remit
timely payments against new obligations occurring during the term of the agreement.
4.18
In January of 2018, Aseptic requested a third payment agreement for delinquencies
owed in the amount of$252,315.72. This payment agreement request was authorized,
and it required a letter of credit and a stipulation that current invoices were to be paid in
a timely manner. As a result of the payment agreement, a typical two-year Class 1
permit was not issued to Aseptic, and the permit was renewed for only three months-at-
a-time.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
Due to Aseptic's repeated failure to make timely payments pursuant to this payment
agreement, OCSD did not renew the permit which expired on March 31, 2019.
However, Aseptic continued to discharge industrial wastewater to the sewer. An Order
to Cease Discharge Without a Valid Permit was issued on April 11, 2019.
The permit which expired March 31, 2019 was not renewed until May 6, 2019 when a
payment was received — the facility had discharged to OCSD without a permit
throughout April and the first week of May — serious violations of OCSD's Wastewater
Discharge Regulations Ordinance. When the May 2019 permit expired on May 31 ,
2019, it was not renewed due to the facility's non-payment of user charges. OCSD
conducted Compliance Inspections on April 30, 2019 and May 2, 2019. Another Order
to Cease Discharge Without a Valid Permit was issued on June 5, 2019. OCSD met
with Aseptic on June 18, 2019, and agreed to settle the violations associated with
discharging without a permit.
OCSD will issue a Settlement Agreement to Aseptic and continue to monitor the
permittee's compliance status in the next reporting period.
Aviation Equipment Processing (Permit No. 1-071037)
Aviation Equipment Processing manufactures, repairs, and assembles metal/composite
structures for the aircraft and aerospace industries.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On April 16, 2019, OCSD issued a Notice of Violation for the monthly average of
January 2019 chromium sampling results that exceeded the monthly average limit.
Aviation Equipment Processing could not determine the source of the violation, and it
was noted that most sampling results prior had been well below monthly average limits
and daily average limits, as were samples following the month in violation.
OCSD staff will continue to monitor Aviation Equipment Processing's discharge and
compliance status during the next reporting period.
4.19
Bazz Houston Co. (Permit No. 1-031010)
Bazz Houston Company (Bazz) is a machining job-shop that manufactures various steel
parts. Wastewater is generated by three identical deburring units used to finish the
machined parts. Wastewater is directed to a below-ground clarifier prior to discharge to
the sewer.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On April 11, 2019, Bazz had an oil & grease violation, for which a Notice of Violation
was issued on May 9, 2019. On May 15, 2019, OCSD conducted a Compliance
Inspection during which Bazz indicated that at the time of the violation a plumbing
contractor was repairing the sewer lines that had roots growing into them, and that this
plumbing repair may have caused a disturbance in the day's discharge resulting in the
violation. OCSD suggested that Bazz review the schedule for clarifier maintenance.
Bazz had already pumped out the clarifier by the time of the inspection. Bazz also
mentioned that a temporary employee working in the deburring area on the day of the
violation may not have followed proper procedure for washing parts prior to deburring.
Bazz had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to
monitor Bazz's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
B. Braun Medical, Inc. (West/Lake) (Permit No. 1-541183)
B. Braun Medical, Inc. (West/Lake) (B. Braun West) manufactures pharmaceutical
intravenous fluid and the packaging for the fluid. The manufacturing process includes
mixing, filling, sterilization, and packaging of aqueous injectable and parenteral
pharmaceutical products. The packages are sprayed and bath-sterilized before they are
placed on pallets and collected for shipment. Waste from the sterilization process
consists of condensate that builds on the packages during the cooling process and the
water drained from the heat exchangers on a weekly basis.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On October 24, 2018, B. Braun West had a pH violation, for which a Notice of Violation
was issued on November 21, 2018. On December 11, 2018, OCSD conducted a
Compliance Inspection during which B. Braun West indicated that multiple sources could
have contributed to the pH violation as the shredding facility and the internal IV bag
process both have the potential to produce low pH wastestreams. B. Braun West
submitted a letter describing corrective actions, which included installation of a new pH
adjustment system.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
OCSD directed B. Braun West to complete installation of the pH adjustment system by
4.20
January 31, 2019. B. Braun West failed to meet this deadline. On April 9, 2019, OCSD
issued a Compliance Requirement Letter directing B. Braun to submit an interim
compliance proposal by April 30, 2019 and to install a temporary pH adjustment system
by May 31, 2019. On May 3, 2019, OCSD received B. Braun West's interim compliance
proposal which was adequate in the established requirements. On May 28, 2019,
OCSD conducted a follow-up Compliance Inspection and confirmed that the temporary
pH adjustment system had been installed and operating and appeared to be maintained.
OCSD directed B. Braun to submit the permanent pretreatment system proposal by
June 30, 2019 and complete installation by November 30,2019. B. Braun submitted the
proposal on June 28, 2019, which appeared to be adequate for achieving long-term
compliance with pH.
OCSD will conduct a follow-up compliance inspection during the next reporting period to
determine B. Braun West's progress and compliance status.
Beo-Maq Plating (Permit No. 1- 511370)
Beo-Mag Plating (Beo-Mag) performs surface finishing on customer supplied parts made
from aluminum, mild steel, and die-cast zinc. Beo-mag is a 40 CFR 433 Metal Finishing
PSNS job shop specializing in decorative chrome and gold plating. The restoration of
motorcycle and classic automobile parts accounts for approximately 80% of their
business, the remaining percentage consists of small volume commercial work such as
bathroom fixtures and other assorted parts. The processing of a steel or die-cast zinc
part includes polishing, electrocleaning, cyanide copper strike, acid copper plating,
manual buffing, alkaline cleaning to remove the buffing residue, nickel plating, and finally
chrome plating. The chrome plating of a typical aluminum part proceeds by polishing,
alkaline cleaning, Aluma acid etch, deoxidation, zincate, copper plating, buffing, alkaline
cleaning to remove the buffing residue, nickel plating, and finally chrome plating. All wet
operations are conducted manually using typical rack and wire plating techniques. The
effluent discharge at Beo-Mag is generated by aqueous fume scrubbing, various spent
process solutions, and the associated rinse wastestreams.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On January 24, 2019, Beo-Mag had cyanide (total) violation, for which a Notice of
Violation was issued on February 26, 2019. In addition, Beo-Mag had a cyanide
monthly average discharge limit violation in the month of January 2019. On March 25,
2019, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection and noted that corrective actions have
been implemented by the facility to address the cyanide issue. On April 18, 2019,
OCSD issued a Notice of Violation for the January 2019 cyanide monthly violation.
OCSD will continue to monitor Beo-Mag's discharge and compliance status on a
quarterly basis.
4.21
Bristol Industries (Permit No. 1-021226)
Bristol Industries (Bristol) manufactures military specification fasteners, including nuts,
bolts, washers, and rivets, as well as airplane window channels. Wastewater is
generated from the metal finishing and aluminum forming operations, which include
acid/alkaline cleaning, plating (silver, copper, nickel, chromium, and cadmium),
anodizing, deburring, and associated rinses. Bristol operates a batch and a continuous
pretreatment system. The continuous pretreatment system consists of an equalization
tank, chrome reduction, cyanide destruction, hydroxide precipitation, pH adjustment, an
effluent pH controller and recorder, final polishing filter, filter press, Lamella clarifier, and
an electrowinning system. The batch treatment system is used to treat spent process
solutions.
In 2017, Bristol completed construction of a new building to house new process and
rinse tanks that would eventually replace all their aging tanks. Bristol also completed
installation of a new state-of-the-art pretreatment system which will also replace their
existing one. The new system consists of a continuous ion exchange (IX) system for
heavy metals removal, and batch treatment for IX regeneration waste, chrome reduction,
and cyanide destruction. The new IX system allows Bristol to recycle most of their
rinses and thus save water.
In June and July 2017, Bristol had cyanide (amenable) violations. In August 2017,
Bristol had a cadmium violation. Bristol submitted a root cause analysis and corrective
action report for the cyanide violations. The report attributed the violations to inadequate
retention time due to high production and high flow rate during those two days,
aggravated by low oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in stage 1 and high ORP in stage
2, thus causing incomplete destruction of cyanide. Bristol's corrective actions consisted
of adjusting the ORP and pH in both stage 1 and stage 2 during heavy production days
to ensure complete treatment of cyanide. Bristol conducted multi-day sampling to
confirm the efficiency of their modifications / corrective actions and the test results all
showed compliance.
In September 2017, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and resampling, during
which Bristol indicated that the pretreatment system operators had been trained on the
proper pH and ORP settings for treatment of the cyanide-bearing wastestreams.
However, the resampling results detected a nickel violation. Bristol submitted another
root cause analysis and corrective action report to address the August 2017 cadmium
violation. During the investigation, Bristol staff discovered that the blade in the batch
treatment tank was not connected to the mixer shaft, and therefore no mixing was
occurring in the batch tank. The mixer blade detached due to loosened fasteners.
Bristol immediately fixed the problem and conducted resampling for cadmium. The
resampling results showed compliance.
In October 2017, OCSD conducted resampling for nickel and the results showed
compliance. Bristol submitted a third root cause analysis and corrective actions report to
address the nickel violation. The report cited inadequate pH and ORP setpoints as the
4.22
cause of the violation. Corrective actions consisted of increasing the pH, reducing the
ORP, and conducting in-house testing of each treated batch for compliance before
discharging the effluent to the sewer.
In April 2018, Bristol had another cyanide (amenable) violation, for which a Notice of
Violation was issued. In June 2018, OCSD conducted another compliance inspection,
during which Bristol submitted another root cause analysis and corrective action report
to address the violation. The report identified the source of the cyanide amenable
violation to several operational issues and issues with ORP probes. Corrective actions
consisted of weekly calibration of the ORP probes, maintenance of calibration record
logs, updating of treatment unit operating instructions to include calibration frequency,
additional operator training, and additional team leader verification for probe check and
record-keeping.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On September 3, 2018, Bristol had another cyanide violation, for which a Notice of
Violation was issued on September 4, 2018. On October 5, 2018, OCSD issued an
Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges in response to the recurring violations. On
October 16, 2018, OCSD held a Compliance Meeting with Bristol, during which the
company attributed the source of the cyanide violation to an overflow situation at the
cyanide treatment unit. On November 8, 2018, OCSD issued a Compliance
Requirements Letter directing Bristol to submit a pretreatment system evaluation and
proposal for improvements. On November 26, 2018, Bristol submitted a response
indicating that Bristol will install an equalization tank in the cyanide treatment unit to
provide adequate treatment capacity. On December 6, 2018, Bristol had another
cadmium violation, for which a Notice of Violation was issued on December 17, 2018.
Bristol also had a monthly cadmium mass limit violation in the month of December 2018.
On December 21, 2018, another cyanide violation occurred. Bristol submitted a root
cause analysis and corrective action report to address the violation. The report identified
the resin beds in the metal scavenger resin system for the cyanide treatment as the
source of the cadmium violation. Bristol indicated that the resin beds were found to be
fouling with a precipitant, which caused channeling in the resin beds allowing treated
cyanide wastewater to travel through the beds with little to no contact with the resins for
metal removal. Corrective actions consist of resin bed rotation and changes based on
the analysis of effluent from cyanide and the metal scavenger system sample point.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On January 8, 2019, Bristol had cadmium, cyanide (amenable and total) and silver
violations. These violations led to monthly mass limit violations for all three constituents
in the month of January 2019. On February 4 and February 5, 2019, Bristol had
further cadmium, silver, and pH violations.
On February 25, 2019, OCSD issued Notices of Violation for the cyanide violation that
4.23
occurred in December 2018 and for the cadmium, cyanide (amenable and total) and
silver violations that occurred in January 2019. On February 26, 2019 and March 18,
2019, OCSD issued Notices of Violation for the cadmium, silver and pH violations that
occurred in early February 2019. On March 12, 2019, OCSD issued a Notice of
Violation for the monthly cadmium mass limit violation that occurred in December 2018.
On March 18, 2019, OCSD issued a Second Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges
in response to the recurring violations and repeated pretreatment system failure on site.
On March 26, 2019, Bristol had another cadmium violation, for which a Notice of
Violation was issued on April 8, 2019. Bristol also had a monthly cadmium mass limit
violation in the month of March 2019. On April 9, 2019, a second Compliance Meeting
was held to discuss the violations that occurred from June 2017 through March 2019. At
the meeting, OCSD informed Bristol of the agency's determination that the recent
compliance issues were caused by inadequate hydraulic capacity of Bristol's existing
pretreatment system, lack of process control of the pretreatment equipment, disconnect
between the upstream production processes and the pretreatment system processes,
and the lack of a complete facility wastewater process review to correct the earlier
violations. OCSD also informed Bristol of its intention to issue an Administrative
Complaint to which Bristol chose to settle the violations that occurred from June 2017
through March 2019 with OCSD.
On April 16, 2019, OCSD issued a Notice of Violation for the January 2019 monthly
mass limit violations for cadmium, cyanide (amenable and total), and silver.
On June 6, 2019, Bristol had another cyanide (total)violation. On June 7, 2019, OCSD
issued a Notice of Violation for the monthly cadmium and silver mass limit violations that
occurred in March 2019. On June 25, 2019, Bristol had further cadmium, silver, and pH
violations, for which Notices of Violation will be issued in the next reporting period.
In general, OCSD has conducted multiple inspections at the facility during this reporting
period and found that Bristol continues to experience pretreatment system failure and
operational control issues onsite. Additionally, OCSD found that Bristol continued to
make several process modifications onsite without prior notification to OCSD.
OCSD will issue a Third Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges during the next
reporting period and enter into a Settlement Agreement with Bristol for penalties totaling
$40,000.00. Additionally, OCSD will issue an Enforcement Compliance Schedule
Agreement (ECSA) outlining several requirements and milestones set forth for the
company to implement corrective actions and achieve long-term compliance with their
permit.
Brothers International Desserts (West) (Permit No. 1-600582)
Brothers International Desserts (West) (Brothers) is an ice-cream and frozen novelty
manufacturer. Most of the wastewater is generated by the cleaning and sanitizing of
4.24
equipment used for the manufacturing processes.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On June 26, 2019 and June 27, 2019, Brothers had pH violations. OCSD will issue a
Notice of Violation and conduct a compliance inspection during the next quarter.
Cadillac Plating, Inc. (Permit No. 1-021062)
Cadillac Plating, Inc. (Cadillac) is a job shop metal finishing facility. Wastewater-
generating processes include alkaline and acid chloride zinc plating, bright tin plating,
bright nickel plating, sulfuric anodizing, alkaline cleaning, acid activation, chromate
conversion coating, chemfilm, and associated rinses. The facility engages in rack
plating only. The facility operates a continuous hydroxide pretreatment system that
consists of pH adjustment, chrome reduction, flocculent addition, clarification, and
sludge dewatering with a filter press. Spent solutions are treated in a batch pretreatment
system, with the effluent routed through the continuous pretreatment system for further
treatment.
In January 2017, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection during which numerous
pretreatment system deficiencies and violations were found including: a measured pH
value exceeding the upper limit of 12.0 S.U. in the facility's discharge; instrumentation
out for repair or not operating; and lack of a qualified industrial wastewater treatment
operator during wastewater discharge. OCSD issued an Order to Cease Noncompliant
Discharges to Cadillac followed by a compliance meeting and issuance of a Probation
Order in February 2017. In March 2017, OCSD conducted a joint probation search with
representatives from the Orange County District Attorney's office, Occupational Safety&
Health Administration (OSHA), and Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA).
OSHA and OCHCA identified the following violations: high carbon monoxide levels
outside the permissible limits; lack of proper personal protective equipment; illegal
disposal of hazardous waste into general waste bins; unsafe electrical conditions; and
general disregard for safety. As a result of numerous safety violations, OSHA issued an
Order Prohibiting Use (OPU).
In August 2017, OCSD issued another Probation Order with the same requirements as
the original probation order but with a different completion date since Cadillac was
unable to meet the progress requirements of the compliance schedule due to OSHA's
Order Prohibiting Use. From August through October 2017, OCSD conducted multiple
compliance inspections to determine whether progress was being made towards the
completion of the Probation Order requirements. OCSD issued two Notices of Violation
in September 2017—one for copper discharge violations and the other for failing to meet
the deadline for completion of the reissued probation order requirements. OCSD also
issued a Compliance Requirements Letter in October 2017 for Cadillac's failure to
provide sufficient updates on their progress during the course of the Probation Order and
the submitted deliverables were below acceptable standards. In November 2017, OCSD
4.25
held another compliance meeting with Cadillac to review the pretreatment system
deficiencies and issued another Compliance Requirements Letter for the outstanding
Probation Order requirements. In December 2017, OCSD conducted a compliance
inspection to verify completion of the remaining items. Requirements related to
pretreatment equipment deficiencies were completed; however, the documentation
provided by Cadillac was not acceptable. OCSD sent comments to Cadillac to correct
the Operations and Maintenance Manual by January 2018.
OCSD conducted another inspection in March 2018 to confirm the completion of the
requirements from the Probation Order. The continuous pretreatment system was found
to be operating in a safe and controlled manner with no indication of overflow, short-
circuiting, or slug loading. The batch treatment system was operational as well and
appeared to be properly maintained. Log sheets for the batch treatment system were
being kept on site and were up to date.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On October 12, 2018, Cadillac had a zinc violation, for which a Notice of Violation was
issued on December 4, 2018. On December 20, 2018, OCSD conducted a Compliance
Inspection during which multiple deficiencies were noted including missing or illegible
process tank labels, a lack of pretreatment system vessel structural integrity that could
lead to treatment bypass, and unidentified noncompliant wastewater. OCSD also noted
that that one of the pretreatment operators failed to obtain qualified treatment operator
certification as required by the Probation Order. Cadillac had also failed to provide a
wastewater characterization for the processing lines prior to using them.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On April 1, 2019, OCSD issued a Compliance Requirements Letter to address the
deficiencies noted during the last reporting period. On April 3, 2019, OCSD conducted
a follow-up Compliance Inspection and observed further noncompliance issues including
pH probes out of calibration; lack of an automated pH adjustment system and final pH
chart recorder; prohibited use of flexible hosing; and process line modifications
implemented without written notification to OCSD. On April 15, 2019, OCSD issued an
Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges directing Cadillac to attend a Compliance
Meeting on April 25, 2019. On May 9, 2019, OCSD issued a second Compliance
Requirements Letter requiring Cadillac to correct the noncompliance issues and
deficiencies by May 31, 2019, as discussed during the compliance meeting. On June 8,
2019, OCSD conducted another Compliance Inspection and found remaining
deficiencies. On June 20, 2019, OCSD conducted another Compliance Inspection
during which OCSD had confirmed that Cadillac had finally completed all requirements.
OCSD will continue to monitor Cadillac's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly
basis.
4.26
Cal-Aurum Industries, Inc. (Permit No. 1-111089)
Cal-Aurum Industries, Inc. (Cal-Aurum) is a large metal finishing job shop. Cal-Aurum
specializes in precious metals plating, providing services for aerospace,
communications, electronics, and military applications. The wet processing includes
rack, barrel, and continuous reel-to-reel processes. Wastewater is generated from the
cleaning, coating, common and precious metals electroplating, electroless plating,
etching, finish stripping, and the rinsing of parts. Cal-Aurum utilizes a batch
pretreatment system for treating spent solutions, and a continuous pretreatment system
for all other waste streams. The metal-bearing rinses receive pH adjustment and
hydroxide precipitation prior to discharge to the sewer. Cal-Aurum also uses a filter
press for dewatering the sludge from the batch treatment operation. The filtrate is
pumped to a final polishing filter then to a holding tank where it is tested for compliance
prior to discharge.
During a permit renewal inspection in March 2017, OCSD noted changes in Cal-Aurum's
process area, which triggered reclassification of Cal-Aurum's 10% New Source and 90%
Existing Source status to 100% New Source. OCSD also noted that the sampling point
for the cyanide-bearing waste stream was not separate from the non-cyanide bearing
waste streams. In May 2017, OCSD held a compliance meeting with Cal-Aurum to
discuss the cyanide sampling point issue and the reclassification to a New Source facility
with more stringent limits. A subsequent meeting was held at the facility in June 2017,
during which a dye test was conducted to determine the level of difficulty to separate
drain lines and provide a separate sampling point for the cyanide-bearing waste stream.
It was concluded that the existing drain lines are comingled and there is no
straightforward way of separating the cyanide-bearing wastewater.
In July 2017, OCSD conducted another inspection during which OCSD notified Cal-
Aurum of the impending New Source reclassification and the required separation of the
cyanide-bearing waste stream from the non-cyanide bearing waste streams. In
September 2017, OCSD held a compliance meeting with Cal-Aurum to discuss the
inspection findings and provide a compliance schedule to remedy the issues mentioned
above. In October 2017, OCSD issued a Probation Order requiring separation of the
cyanide-bearing waste streams from the non-cyanide bearing waste streams, and
submittal of a waste management proposal by the end of December 2017.
From January through April 2018, OCSD conducted multiple follow-up compliance
inspections to verify compliance with the Probation Order requirements. Due to Cal-
Aurum's failure to complete the requirements by the December 2017 deadline,
Compliance Requirement Letters were issued in January and February 2018, followed
by a compliance meeting and revision of compliance schedule dates. Cal-Aurum finally
completed the separation of cyanide bearing waste streams and the installation of the
cyanide treatment system in April 2018.
4.27
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On July 17, 2018, Cal-Aurum had cadmium concentration and mass limit violations, for
which a Notice of Violation was issued on July 26, 2018. Cal-Aurum removed cadmium
from the processing lines some years back and has not had cadmium violations since
then. On August 1, 2018, OCSD received a response letterfrom Cal-Aurum presenting
the results of their investigation. Cal-Aurum analyzed and confirmed the high levels of
cadmium in their split sample. Since the cadmium has already been eliminated from
Cal-Aurum's process, Cal-Aurum investigated the recently installed ion exchange
system. Cal-Aurum determined that the treated water from the ion exchange system
was being contaminated by resin that had not been fully regenerated. Cal-Aurum
contacted the supplier of the ion exchange canisters and discussed improvements in the
QA/QC procedure to prevent future resin contamination.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
Cal-Aurum had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to
monitor Cal-Aurum's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Catalina Cylinders (Permit No. 1-031021)
Catalina Cylinders, a Div. of APP (Catalina Cylinders) manufactures high pressure
gas cylinders from 6061 aluminum alloy material. The cylinders are produced in
various sizes for the beverage, medical, and SCUBA diving industries. Wastewater is
generated from the alkaline cleaning, hydrostatic pressure testing, and the iron
phosphate conversion coating operations. Pretreatment at Catalina Cylinders is
limited to a three-stage underground clarifier.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On January 4, 2019 Catalina Cylinders had an oil & grease mass violation, for which
a Notice of Violation was issued on March 28, 2019. On March 20, 2019, OCSD
conducted a Compliance Inspection during which OCSD explained to Catalina
Cylinders that based on the manufacturing operations conducted onsite, the
company's wastewater discharge is subject to the Aluminum Forming federal
categorical pretreatment standards and, as a result, the oil & grease mass limits are
production-based. OCSD explained further that to comply with the stringent
production-based mass limits, the oil & grease concentration must be kept below 15
mg/L during an average day's flow, which would likely require pretreatment beyond
the clarifier they presently operate.
On April 1, 2019, Catalina Cylinders had another oil & grease mass violation. On
May 16, 2019, OCSD issued a Notice of Violation and conducted another
Compliance Inspection to reiterate concerns about Catalina Cylinders'
noncompliance with the oil & grease mass limits.
4.28
OCSD will pursue escalated enforcement during the next reporting period.
Central Powder Coating (Permit No. 1-021189)
Central Powder Coating (CPC) is a medium-sized job shop powder coater which
employs a conveyorized iron phosphate wash line plus a large manual spray wash booth
for cleaning and surface treatment/conversion coating of the parts before powder
coating. Wastewater is generated from the manual spray booth plus intermittent
discharges from the second chamber of the automated wash line. CPC's pretreatment
system consists of a three-stage aboveground clarifier equipped with an automated pH
controller and caustic solution addition into first stage of the clarifier.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On June 26, 2018, CPC had a molybdenum violation, for which a Notice of Violation
was issued on July 18, 2018. On August 1, 2018, OCSD conducted a Compliance
Inspection during which CPC attributed the source of the molybdenum violation to the
discharge of spent phosphate solution into the clarifier. As part of the investigation, CPC
discovered that their liquid iron phosphate formulation contained sodium molybdate,
which caused the molybdenum violation. On August 10, 2018, CPC submitted a
corrective action plan to address the violation. Corrective actions included clarifier pump-
out and replacement of the existing iron phosphate solution to a non-molybdate
formulation. On August 14, 2018, CPC had another molybdenum violation, for which a
Notice of Violation was issued on October 2, 2018. On October 8, 2018, CPC
submitted a second corrective action letter indicating that the company has not
completely replaced their iron phosphate solution; hence the second molybdenum
violation. CPC has since then converted to a non-molybdate formulation and further
OCSD sampling results showed compliance.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
CPC had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to
monitor CPC's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
City of Huntington Beach Fire Department (Permit No. 1-111015)
City of Huntington Beach Fire Department (HB Fire) operates three oil extraction wells.
The extracted crude oil and groundwater mixture is routed to an oil/water separation
tank. Crude oil is shipped offsite while the separated wastewater is routed through an
aboveground clarifier prior to discharge to the sewer.
4.29
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On April 1, 2019, HB Fire had an oil & grease violation, for which a Notice of Violation
was issued on May 28, 2019. HB Fire reported that the violation was due to a build-up
of oil and grease in the sample port and failure of the operator to flush the port prior to
sampling. Through an email dated June 10, 2019, HB Fire informed OCSD that they
had installed a third stage for the clarifier and a separate sample box as a corrective
measure.
OCSD will conduct a Compliance Inspection during the next quarter to confirm
implementation of HB Fire's corrective measures.
CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp. (Permit No. 1- 521849)
CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp. (CJ Foods) manufactures, packages, and distributes
dumplings. Wastewater is generated by the cleaning and sterilization of processing and
packaging equipment along with some other miscellaneous washdown. Pretreatment
consists of pH adjustment in a 5,000-gallon underground clarifier.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On July 30, 2018, CJ Foods had a pH violation, for which a Notice of Violation was
issued on August 22, 2018. On August 28, 2018, OCSD conducted a Compliance
Inspection and resampling during which CJ Foods indicated that on the day of the
violation, the caustic supply had run out. CJ Foods now maintains a backup drum for
immediate replacement. The resampling result showed compliance.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
CJ Foods had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to
monitor CJ Foods' discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Cooper and Brain, Inc. (Permit No. 1-031070)
Cooper and Brain, Inc. (Cooper & Brain) produces crude oil for delivery to chemical
processing plants and oil refineries located in Wilmington, CA. The crude oil is extracted
with groundwater from ground formations at various depths. Resultant water is
discharged to the sewerage system.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On July 13, 2018, Cooper & Brain had an oil & grease violation, for which a Notice of
Violation was issued on September 10, 2018. On September 17, 2018, Cooper& Brain
submitted a corrective action report attributing the violation to a buildup of biomass and
4.30
oil on the outside of the sample hose that was used to fill the grab jars. As a corrective
measure, Cooper & Brain has ensured that the sample hose was cleaned prior to
sample collection. Results of subsequent sampling showed compliance.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
Cooper & Brain had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will
continue to monitor Cooper & Brain's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly
basis.
D.F. Stauffer Biscuit Co., Inc. (Permit No. 1-600414)
D.F. Stauffer Biscuit Co., Inc. (Stauffer) is a food processing facility where baked goods,
including crackers and cookies, are produced. Wastewater is generated from the
cleaning and sanitizing of equipment and processing rooms. All wastewater is collected
through floor drains and directed to a three-stage clarifier with sample box.
Stauffer has issues maintaining pH compliance due to the acidic cleaning agents used
onsite and fermentation of the high strength (BOD/TSS)wastewater in the clarifier prior
to discharge.
In March 2018, Stauffer had a pH violation forwhich a Notice of Violation was issued. In
June 2018, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection during which another pH
violation was detected, indicating a chronic concern for pH exceedances. Later that
month, Stauffer installed a caustic drip system in the washroom for interim compliance
until a permanent long-term solution is installed.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On July 19, 2018, OCSD issued a Notice of Violation for the June 2018 pH violation.
D.F. Stauffer had started working on securing and installing a new permanent pH
adjustment system, which was expected to be fully installed and operational by May
2019.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On June 17, 2019, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection and confirmed the
installation of the permanent pH adjustment system. Stauffer had no further pH
violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to monitor D.F. Stauffer's
discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Darling International, Inc (Permit No. 1-511378)
Darling International, Inc. (Darling)collects and treats waste from interceptors, clarifiers,
4.31
and grease traps of food service establishments within the Southern California Region.
Hauled waste is transported to the facility yard, unloaded to a large underground sump,
then pumped to aboveground batch treatment tanks where it is treated with lime and
polymer to enhance separation of solids and liquids. The sludge is dewatered and
allowed to air dry in large rectangular vessels. The treated wastewater is collected and
discharged to the sewer. The wastewater discharge permit authorizes Darling to
discharge wastewater from the treatment of grease trap waste from restaurants,
cafeterias, or other similar facilities, but not yellow grease or cooking oil. In addition,
processing of grease from industrial kitchens, car washing facilities, metal recycling
yards, or other sources of industrial or hazardous wastes is prohibited. Any generator
sources outside of OCSD's service area must have a profile submitted in advance to
OCSD for review and acceptance.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On August 28, 2018, Darling had a pH violation, for which a Notice of Violation was
issued on October 22, 2018. On November 16, 2018, OCSD conducted a Compliance
Inspection during which Darling stated that pH monitoring is achieved through the use of
pH strips at various points in the process including the wastewater collection sump.
However, no pH logs are kept. The pH violation occurred because the pH adjustment
process was only manually completed by the operators and the level of monitoring using
pH strips was inadequate. In addition, the pH fluctuates due to the biologic nature of the
type of waste. OCSD required installation of a pH meter and a pH recorder and operator
training.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On June 4, 2019, Darling had another pH violation. OCSD will issue a Notice of
Violation and conduct a Compliance Inspection during the next quarter and pursue
escalated enforcement as a result of the continued noncompliance and lack of an
effective pH adjustment system.
Dr. Smoothie Enterprises - DBA Bevolution Group (Permit No. 1-600131)
Dr. Smoothie Enterprises— DBA Bevolution Group (Dr. Smoothie) processes, packages
and distributes fruit beverage concentrates. The operations performed include mixing of
concentrates manufactured offsite, packaging, and distribution. Currently, the
wastewater does not undergo pretreatment prior to discharge to the sewer.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On November 5, 2018, Dr. Smoothie had a minor pH violation, for which a Notice of
Violation was issued on November 20, 2018. On December 6, 2018, OCSD conducted
a Compliance Inspection and resampling during which OCSD indicated that pH
treatment may be necessary to ensure consistent compliance, particularly since the pH
4.32
levels of some of the fruit concentrate products they process are below the local limit of
6.0. The resampling result showed another pH violation, for which a Notice of Violation
was issued on December 17, 2018.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On March 4, 2019, OCSD held a Compliance Meeting with Dr. Smoothie during which
the company reported that they have implemented manual pH adjustment on all
wastestreams that are found to be acidic, with plans to install a large (500- gallon)
collection tank where the acidic wastestreams can be collected and treated with an
automated pH adjust system in the long run.
OCSD will continue to monitor Dr. Smoothie's discharge and compliance status on a
quarterly basis.
Dunham Metal Processing (Permit No. 1-021325)
Dunham Metal Processing (Dunham) is a small metal finishing job shop that specializes
in clear, color, and multicolor sulfuric anodizing of aluminum parts for the aerospace,
automotive, electronics, medical, and sporting goods industries. Wastewater is
generated from the various spent process solutions and associated rinses. Dunham
treats rinses and dye solutions in a continuous pretreatment system that consists of pH
adjustment, polymer addition, and clarification in a lamella clarifier. Filtrate from the filter
press is recycled back to treatment while treated water from the clarifier is discharged to
the sewer. Most concentrated spent solutions are either waste-hauled offsite and/or
reused to make up new process solutions. The spent anodizing solutions are used to
make up fresh deoxidizer. The dye solutions are mostly replenished but are sometimes
bled in small amounts into the general waste stream which only undergoes pH
adjustment prior to discharge to the sewer. Sludge from tank bottoms are pumped once
every three or four years and waste-hauled offsite.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On January 9, 2019, Dunham had copper and nickel violations, for which a Notice of
Violation was issued on January 18, 2019. In addition, Dunham had copper and nickel
monthly average limit violations in the month of January 2019. On February 5, 2019,
OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection during which Dunham indicated that the
violation occurred due a faulty pH meter that may have also been out of calibration. As
a corrective measure, Dunham replaced the pH meter and installed a larger propeller on
the mixer in the precipitation tank to enhance mixing efficiency. Dunham reported that
pH probes are cleaned on a daily basis. Dunham is also considering replacing the flat-
bottom clarifier with one that has a conical bottom to enhance the settling of solids.
On April 15, 2019, OCSD issued a Notice of Violation for the January 2019 copper and
nickel monthly violations. OCSD staff will continue to monitor Dunham's discharge and
4.33
compliance status during the next reporting period.
Electro Metal Finishing (Permit No.1-021158)
Electro Metal Finishing performs powder coating and liquid paint spraying on a variety of
parts, typically aluminum or galvanized steel, that are received from outside customers.
Power coating process at Electro Metal includes cleaning in heated iron phosphate
solution followed by rinsing with city water. Wastewater generated from the powder
coating line is pumped to a batch treatment tank once a week for pH adjustment
followed by chemical precipitation of solids. After completion of treatment, a sample is
sent to an outside laboratory to ensure compliance with zinc and copper limits before
discharging the treated wastewater to the sewer.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On August 23, 2018, Electro Metal Finishing had a molybdenum violation, for which a
Notice of Violation was issued on September 28, 2018. On October 9, 2018, OCSD
conducted a Compliance Inspection during which it was concluded the chemical used in
iron phosphate bath was the source of the molybdenum violation. Electro Metal Finishing
agreed to stop discharging and to search for an alternate chemical for their iron
phosphate tank. While testing for a new chemical, the company hauled off all the
wastewater generated at their facility.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
Electro Metal Finishing had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will
continue to monitor Electro Metal's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly
basis.
Excello Circuits Manufacturing Corp (Permit No. 1-521855)
Excello Circuits Manufacturing Corp. (Excello) is a full-service printed circuit board
manufacturer. Wastewater is generated from the inner-layer preclean and photo resist
develop, etch, and stripping processes and from the outer-layer electroless copper
plating, photo print developing, and copper/tin pattern plating and etch and strip
processes. Excello's pretreatment system consists of a continuous ion exchange (IX)
recycling system for metal-bearing rinses, and a batch treatment system for spent
process solutions, mainly acid precleaners. Spent copper etchant is wastehauled offsite
along with other spent process solutions. Sludge from the batch treatment process is
dewatered with a filter press and wastehauled offsite. Non-metal bearing processes
wastestreams and rinsewater from the photo resist and soldermask developing, along
with resist strip rinsing, are discharged to the sample point without treatment.
In June 2017, Excello had a copper violation. In August 2017, OCSD conducted a
4.34
compliance inspection during which OCSD noted that the continuous IX pretreatment
system had been disconnected. The batch treatment system was still operational for
some wastestreams. The company also had an inadequate collection sump causing
metal-bearing wastewater to overflow to the non-metal bearing wastewater chamber and
discharged directly to the sewer without treatment. Furthermore, several metal-bearing
wastestreams were found connected to the non-metal bearing plumbing and bypassing
treatment. In September 2017, OCSD conducted another compliance inspection and
issued an Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges.
In October 2017, Excello had another copper violation. Excello indicated that the copper
exceedance was due to troubleshooting during the re-installation of their IX pretreatment
system. OCSD conducted resampling and the results showed compliance. OCSD held
a compliance meeting with Excello, during which OCSD directed Excello to segregate
non-metal bearing and metal-bearing wastestreams and to operate the continuous
pretreatment system at all times the facility is discharging. OCSD also required Excello
to submit updated plans and drawings with an accompanying waste destination and tank
schedule, and to perform wastewater characterization.
In December 2017, OCSD issued a Compliance Requirement Letter reiterating the items
discussed during the October 2017 compliance meeting. Specifically, the letter
addressed the need for an improved treatment system and operational controls, updated
facility drawings, elimination of bypass wastestreams, and requirements for wastewater
characterization.
In April 2018, OCSD detected further copper violations during a downstream monitoring
conducted at Excello. In May 2018, OCSD issued an Order to Cease Noncompliant
Discharges to Excello in regard to copper exceedances from the downstream sampling.
In June 2018, OCSD held a compliance meeting with Excello to address the
downstream results. Excello stated that the exceedances are due to errors in the batch
treatment process, and that new treatment chemistry and a new filter press were going
to be implemented to correct the no-compliance.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On July 23, 2018, OCSD issued a Probation Order requiring Excello to implement
corrective actions associated with the copper violations. On July 31, 2018, Excello had
another copper violation, for which a Notice of Violation was issued on August 23,2018.
On November 5, 2018, OCSD conducted another Compliance Inspection. To meet the
Probation Order requirements, the company replumbed several lines and modified
treatment with new equipment and upgrades but failed to meet the compliance schedule
dates. On November 8, 2018, OCSD issued another Compliance Requirement Letter
for Excello's failure to meet Probation Order deadlines. Excello started bringing the new
system on-line to be able to maintain compliance with appropriate operational control
over treatment.
4.35
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On March 18, 2019, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection and confirmed that all
Probation Order items have been completed. Excello had no further violations during
this reporting period. OCSD will continue to monitor Excello's discharge and compliance
status on a quarterly basis.
FMH Aerospace Corp DBA FMH Corporation (Permit No. 1-571331)
FMH Aerospace Corp (FMH) manufactures complex fabricated components including
expansion and flexible joints, formed and welded metal bellows, high pressure (braided)
gas or fluid transfer lines, and pressurized ducts for aerospace, commercial, industrial,
military/defense, and transportation applications. Many of the fabricated parts require
extensive production tooling; therefore, a large portion of the facility is dedicated to
general machine shop operations. Wastewater is generated primarily from the rinses
following the surface cleaning and finishing operations performed on the metal parts
during the various manufacturing stages, contact cooling for seam (resistance)welding,
and secondarily by hydrostatic testing and fluorescent penetrant inspection conducted
on the assemblies. The pretreatment system at FMH consists solely of pH adjustment.
In October 2016, and April and May 2017, FMH had silver violations. In July 2017, FMH
had another silver violation. In August 2017, FMH had chromium, copper, lead, nickel,
silver, and zinc violations. In December 2017, OCSD issued an Order to Cease
Noncompliant Discharges and held a compliance meeting with FMH during which FMH
informed OCSD that the company had purchased and already installed a new silver
recovery/electrowinning unit to prevent further silver violations. FMH also indicated that
the heavy metal violations that occurred in August most likely resulted from cross-
contamination from the dust generated during floor resurfacing in their machine shop.
Fine metal particulates had accumulated on the floor over the years of machining
operations, and during floor resurfacing, dust containing metal particulates found its way
to the sample point.
In March 2018, FMH had another silver violation. In May 2018, OCSD conducted a
compliance inspection during which FMH indicated that they plan to appeal the violation
if their split sample result turns out to be compliant. However, the split sample result
was also out of compliance. As a result, OCSD issued a Second Order to Cease
Noncompliant Discharges. In June 2018, OCSD held a compliance meeting with FMH,
during which FMH attributed the silver violation to internet connectivity failure that halted
the silver recovery system. FMH informed OCSD that they have doubled the capacity of
their silver recovery system and that all the filters will be replaced every quarter.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On July 11, 2018, OCSD issued a Compliance Requirement Letter directing FMH to
collect silver recovery waste in a batch discharge tank and maintain a batch discharge
4.36
log. FMH was required to test each batch for compliance and to discharge only if the
testing demonstrated compliance with the silver limits. Additionally, FMH was required
to maintain waste manifests and make them available to OCSD upon request. On July
27, 2018, FMH had another silver violation, for which a Notice of Violation was issued on
September 4, 2018. On September 25, 2018, OCSD conducted a Compliance
Inspection during which FMH indicated that they traced the violation to silver residue that
was deposited on the floor of the X-Ray film processing room. Specifically,the drain that
captures water from the processor rinse and rinse sink got clogged causing water to
back up onto the floor. When the clog was removed, the water that backed up on the
floor flowed back to the drain, thereby causing a silver violation. On October 9, 2018,
FMH submitted a root cause corrective action report. Corrective actions consisted of
replacing the rinse sink, cleaning the floor to remove silver residue which included waste
hauling the residue and painting the floor, and setting up a closed loop system for the
processor rinse and rinse sink.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On February 25, 2019, OCSD conducted a follow-up Compliance Inspection and
confirmed that the rinse sink was replaced, and the floor was re-painted. The new closed
loop system for the processor rinse and rinse sink was operational and appeared to be
maintained.
OCSD will continue to monitor FMH's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly
basis.
Goodwin Co. (1-031043)
Goodwin Company(Goodwin) manufactures household cleaning and surface treatment
products which are formulated from raw chemical feedstocks and soft water, dispensed
into plastic containers, packaged, then sold to wholesale and retail distribution centers.
Major chemicals used in the formulations include glycols, amines, and acetates. Simple
Green, Pinesol, Anti-Freeze, Armor-All and ammonia-based windshield cleaners are
some of the most popular products. Floor and equipment wash-downs represent the
majority of the industrial wastewater generated by Goodwin, along with a small amount
of soft water system reject. Floor run-off is collected in a trench system that flows to a
sump in the middle of the production floor, and then pumped over to an equalization tank
equipped with a pH monitoring and adjustment system.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On May 2, 2019, Goodwin had an oil & grease violation, for which a Notice of Violation
was issued on June 4, 2019. On June 25, 2019, OCSD conducted a Compliance
Inspection and resampling during which Goodwin indicated that they were unable to
identify the source of the violation as no specific system upset occurred during the
previous sampling event. The resampling results showed compliance.
4.37
OCSD will continue to monitor Goodwin's discharge and compliance status on a
quarterly basis.
Green Clean Water & Waste Services (Permit No, 1-521857)
Green Clean Water & Waste Services (Green Clean) is a centralized waste treatment
facility. Non-hazardous wastewater from utility vaults is delivered to the facility for
treatment and discharge to the sewer. Green Clean utilizes an equalization/holding tank
and a packaged treatment system consisting of a three-stage cartridge filter system
followed by final polishing with a 200-lb canister of carbon and metals adsorption media.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On April 2, 2018, Green Clean had a titanium violation, for which a Notice of Violation
was issued on December 27, 2018.
January 1 — July 31, 2019
Green Clean ceased operations in 2019 due to their facility lease expiring, having not
discharged since August 2018.
Hanson-Loran (Permit No. 1-031107)
Hanson-Loran manufactures water-based floor finishers and specialty cleaners for
distribution and sales by various independent contractors. The processes include dry
blending (from which there is no wastewater discharge) and wet blending. The dry
blending process is located inside the building, where dry powders are blended to
produce Hanson-Loran's industrial cleaners. Wet blending is accomplished in four
mixing tanks at the rear of the building. Products include floor cleaners, waxes,
strippers, cleaners, degreasers, sanitizers, disinfectants, and soaps. Hanson-Loran's
treatment system consists of an underground three-stage clarifier with manual pH
adjustment using pH strips and addition of granulated citric acid.
In October 2017, Hanson-Loran had pH violations. In November 2017, OCSD
conducted a compliance inspection and resampling, which showed compliance.
However, noting that the treatment system lacked adequate control, OCSD advised
Hanson-Loran to take corrective measures to prevent further pH noncompliance.
Hanson-Loran installed an automated pH control system to prevent further pH violations.
During OCSD's routine sampling in June 2018, a variation in pH readings was noted at
different depths in the sample point, indicating a lack of proper mixing. Hanson-Loran
was informed that the representative volume of wastewater being sampled should be
sufficiently mixed so that the pH readings are consistent across the entire depth of the
sample point.
4.38
July 1 — December 31, 2018
Hanson-Loran installed a second probe to verify the pH following adjustment in the
clarifier. Hanson-Loran had no pH violations during this reporting period.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On March 7, 2019, Hanson-Loran had another pH violation, for which a Notice of
Violation was issued on March 19, 2019. On April 3, 2019, OCSD conducted a
Compliance Inspection during which it was determined that the pH adjustment
system's set points were not adequately set, therefore the system was over-dosing
caustic to the clarifier. The pretreatment system operators were also manually
adding citric acid to the final stage of the clarifier prior to the sample point in attempt
to reduce the pH. However, due to lack of proper mixing of the chemical, a layer of
citric acid had developed on the bottom of the clarifier.
On April 4, 2019, and May 28, 2019, Hanson-Loran had additional pH violations, for
which Notices of Violation were issued on May 9, 2019 and June 12, 2019,
respectively. On June 13, 2019, OCSD issued Hanson-Loran a Compliance
Requirement Letter for Hanson-Loran to attend a Compliance Meeting.
OCSD will conduct a Compliance Meeting and issue a Compliance Requirements
Letter during the next quarter.
Harbor Truck Bodies, Inc. (Permit No. 1-021286)
Harbor Truck Bodies, Inc. (Harbor Truck) manufactures utility bodies, platform beds,
toolboxes, and rear step-bumpers. The effluent discharge at Harbor Truck is generated
from the soap cleaning and phosphate washing plus rinsing in the spray booth, with the
wash water collected in a large trench and sump system installed in the wash chamber
floor. From the sump, the wash water is pumped by liquid level control to the three
stage pretreatment system on the west side of the facility, where pH is adjusted in the
first stage using caustic, followed by polymer/floc addition for solids precipitation in the
second stage, then overflow into a collection/solids settling tank before discharge by
gravity out of the building to a three stage underground clarifier. Harbor Truck uses a
filter press for dewatering of solids from the settling tank.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
In the month of April 2019, Harbor Truck had a monthly zinc violation. OCSD will issue a
Notice of Violation during the next quarter.
4.39
Hightower Plating & Manufacturing Co. (Permit No. 1-021185)
Hightower Plating & Manufacturing Co. (Hightower) manufactures aerospace-quality
washers by stamping steel, stainless steel, and aluminum coils. The parts are deburred
and then processed through a variety of metal finishing steps depending on the material,
to achieve the desired finish. Hightower's metal finishing operations include alkaline
cleaning, acid activation, chromic and sulfuric anodizing, cadmium plating, acid zinc
plating, nickel plating, caustic etching, deoxidation, chem film, dichromate sealing, and
passivation.
Low concentration waste streams are being treated using two ion exchange systems -
one for cyanide bearing waste streams and one for non-cyanide bearing waste streams.
The treated water is returned to the process tanks for reuse. The regenerant wastes
from both ion exchange systems are processed through an evaporator. Concentrated
wastes (including but not limited to chromic acid from the anodizing tanks) are
wastehauled off-site. A small number of waste streams from the sulfuric anodize and
chem film lines are sent to a chromium collection tank and then treated using the
chromium reduction system.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On May 8, 2018, Hightower had cadmium concentration and mass violations,for which a
Notice of Violation were issued on June 10, 2019. In a response letter dated June 25,
2019, Hightower stated that its investigation failed to identify a root cause, as no
changes to its wastewater generating and treatment activities have occurred, and
confirmation sampling conducted by Hightower on May 29, 2019 and June 3, 2019
showed compliance with the cadmium limits. Analysis of Hightower's split sample
yielded a lower result but still in exceedance of the cadmium limit.
OCSD will conduct a Compliance Inspection during the next quarter to review
Hightower's operations and pretreatment system.
Hixson Metal Finishing (Permit No. 1-061115)
Hixson Metal Finishing (Hixson) is a large metal finishing job shop. Various metallic
parts from the aviation, automotive, and electronics industries are received for surface
finishing through aluminum chemfilm and dyeing, cadmium, copper, and nickel
electroplating, stainless-steel passivation, as well as a multitude of chemical precleaning
and surface activation processes. Wastewater is generated from the rinses used in the
various surface finish processes and fume hood wash water. Pretreatment consists of
cyanide destruction and chrome reduction followed by heavy metals precipitation using
caustic soda for pH adjustment, coagulant injection,followed by polymer/flocculation and
solids settling in a lamella clarifier and removal to a sludge thickening tank. Overflow
from the clarifier is discharged to the sample box. The sludge from the clarifier is
dewatered with a filter press. Filtrate from the filter press is plumbed to the heavy metals
4.40
precipitation module for further treatment.
In October, November, and December 2017, Hixson had cadmium and nickel violations.
In December 2017, OCSD held a compliance meeting with Hixson during which OCSD
pointed out that increasing levels of water usage, as well as wastewater generation and
discharge, were noted at the facility. The two sampling events in October and
November 2017 reported effluent flows of 55,000 gallons and 60,000 gallons per day,
respectively, which were well above the permit flow-base of 39,000 gallons per day.
Hixson stated that the new anodize line that had been under construction for the past 3-
4 years had finally come online over the summer, and that the facility was having issues
with the conductivity rinse controls installed in various rinse tanks on the new line. The
flow controllers were not shutting off due to unanticipated high TDS / mineral
concentrations in the influent city water. OCSD highlighted the concern that Hixson's
existing pretreatment system may be undersized for the higher flows, thereby losing its
treatment efficiency and effectiveness for reduction of heavy metals, particularly
cadmium and nickel, which are Hixson's primary metals of concern. The higher water
consumption and outflows also created a dilution condition at the facility. Hixson
acknowledged the situation and stated they were working on a solution.
In February 2018, OCSD issued an Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges due to the
numerous violations of cadmium, copper, chromium, and nickel detected during
downstream monitoring of Hixon's discharge. In March 2018, OCSD held another
compliance meeting with Hixson, where Hixson agreed to a Settlement Agreement to
settle their continued noncompliance. OCSD conducted another compliance inspection
during which pretreatment deficiencies were identified including lack of operating
procedures and lack of pretreatment system control and maintenance. These
deficiencies were addressed in the Settlement Agreement.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
The final Settlement Agreement was issued on September 27, 2018 and became
effective on October 18, 2018.
In the evening of September 29, 2018, a slug discharge occurred at Hixson, for which a
notification was made to OCSD on October 3, 2018. Approximately 300 gallons of a
10% chromic acid solution was spilled into a secondary containment area due to a leak
from a broken flange gasket going to the chiller pump from a process tank. An empty
piping conduit in the wall between the secondary containment and the pretreatment area
caused the spilled solution to enter the acid rinse holding tank, and through pretreatment
system. On October 2, 2018, Hixson had chromium and silver violations coinciding with
the slug discharge. On October 11, 2018, OCSD issued a Notice of Violation for the
chromium and silver violations and conducted a Compliance Inspection during which
OCSD had noted that the piping conduit between secondary containment and the
pretreatment area had been capped. On October 18, 2018, OCSD conducted
resampling which yielded compliant results.
4.41
On November 28, 2018, as required in the Settlement Agreement, Hixson submitted a
Waste Management Plan, an Industrial Waste Characterization, an Operation and
Maintenance Manual, and a proposal to install an Ion Exchange System. An Ion
Exchange System was required as a result of a change from Pretreatment Standards of
Existing Sources (PSES) to Pretreatment Standards of New Sources (PSNS).
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On March 1, 2019, Hixson's new permit limits under the Pretreatment Standards for
New Sources (PSNS) became effective. On May 14, 2019 and June 18, 2019,
Hixon had cadmium violations.
OCSD will issue Notices of Violation and pursue escalated enforcement action during
the next quarter.
Independent Forge Company (Permit No. 1-021401)
Independent Forge Company(Independent Forge)forges parts for commercial aviation,
military specific applications, and other market sectors including bicycles, archery, jet
ski, and motorcycle parts. Wastewater is generated from the deburring, caustic etching,
acid cleaning, and dye penetrant testing operations and associated rinses. Independent
uses a batch treatment system to treat the waste streams from the caustic etching and
acid cleaning operations.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On February 7 and February 27, 2018, Independent had zinc violations, for which
Notices of Violation were issued on March 7 and April 3, 2019, respectively. In
addition, Independent a zinc monthly mass limit violation in the month of February 2019.
Independent Forge claimed that the root cause of the violation was the filter press, citing
the age of the mesh material on the plates caused a loss of removal efficiency.
However, Independent Forge was unable to explain the increase of zinc from 12.4 mg/L
to 36.6 mg/L between the two sample dates, despite Independent Forge's claim that it
was the same batch of treated wastewater. On April 10, 2019, OCSD conducted a
Compliance Inspection during which several deficiencies were noted including the lack
of a functioning pH meter in the batch treatment system, excessive accumulation of
metal-bearing solids in the batch treatment tank, the use of the batch treatment tank as
the final holding tank prior to discharge, and the lack of an effective batch treatment
procedure.
On May 1, 2019, OCSD issued a Notice of Violation for the February 2019 zinc monthly
mass limit violation. On May 9, 2019, OCSD staff issued a Compliance Requirements
Letter directing Independent Forge to attend a Compliance Meeting to discuss multiple
non-compliance issues. The Compliance Meeting was held on May 29, 2019. On June
27, 2019, OCSD issued a Probation Order requiring Independent Forge to rectify the
4.42
compliance issues noted above.
OCSD will continue to monitor Independent's discharge and compliance status on a
quarterly basis.
Industrial Metal Finishers (Permit No. 1-521828)
Industrial Metal Finishers (IMF) is a specialty processing job shop performing wet and
dry surface finishing operations on customer supplied parts of aluminum, carbon and
stainless steel, and titanium. IMF does not have any categorically regulated metal
finishing operations and is therefore permitted exclusively under local limits. Parts are
used in aerospace, commercial, communication, industrial, medical, and military/defense
applications. Dry mechanical operations include shot peening, dry abrasive blasting,
and liquid honing. Wastewater is generated through wet deburring or tumbling, and
ultrasonic cleaning. Wastewater is directed to a batch tank treatment system where the
pH is adjusted and flocculent is added to precipitate metals prior to discharge through a
polishing micron filter into the floor sink sample point.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On December 7, 2018, IMF had a pH violation.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On January 2, 2019, OCSD issued a Notice of Violation for the pH noncompliance and
conducted a Compliance Inspection on January 22, 2019, during which OCSD noted
that IMF had already made the appropriate corrections.
IMF had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to monitor
IMF's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
J&J Marine Acquisitions, LLC (Permit No. 1-551152)
J&J Marine Acquisitions, LLC (J&J Marine) performs boat maintenance and repair
work, including hull repairs and recoating, plus interior remodeling. Wastewater is
generated from the boat washing and cleaning process. Pretreatment consists of
bag filtration followed by electrocoagulation and final pH adjustment. J&J Marine
also has the capability to collect, treat, store and reuse stormwater in the boat
washing and cleaning process throughout the facility (rather than discharging to the
Newport Beach Harbor).
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On April 23, 2019, J&J Marine had a copper violation, for which a Notice of Violation
4.43
was issued on May 13, 2019. On May 28, 2019, J&J Marine filed an appeal against the
Notice of violation based on the analytical result of their split sample, which came out to
be significantly lower than OCSD's result and the copper discharge limit.
OCSD will evaluate J&J's appeal request by analyzing the archived split sample.
Kenlen Specialties, Inc. (Permit No. 1-021171)
Kenlen Specialties, Inc. (Kenlen) is job shop powdercoater. The company works on
aluminum and steel parts, which undergo a washing step prior to painting or powder
coating. Washing is done through a three-stage conveyorized automated washing
machine with iron phosphate solution to remove any oil or other contaminants on the
parts, followed by a dragout rinse and final rinsing with deionized water. The rinsewater
is discharged directly from the machine to the sewer through the above ground sample
box.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On October 2, 2018, Kenlen had molybdenum and zinc violations, for which a Notice of
Violation was issued on October 11, 2018. On October 30, 2018, OCSD conducted a
Compliance Inspection during which it was determined that the iron phosphate solution
used by Kenlen contained molybdenum and that the violations were a result of dragout
entering the rinsewater. Kenlen stated they would instruct their employees to use the
dragout to replenish the process bath instead of emptying collected dragout into the
rinse tank. OCSD directed Kenlen to not dispose of remaining molybdenum-based
solution to the sewer without treatment. Kenlen is considering replacing their existing
iron phosphate solution with a non-molybdate formulation.
OCSD will continue to monitor Kenlen's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly
basis.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
Kenlen had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to
monitor Kenlen's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Legendary Baking of California, LLC (Permit No. 1-600294)
Legendary Baking of California, LLC (Legendary Baking) is a pie manufacturing
company. Operations include dough mixing, filling mixing, assembly, baking, freezing
and packaging. Wastewater is generated from the washing of mixing and baking
equipment and tools. Wastewater is sent to an underground clarifier for solids removal,
then to a pH adjustment/recirculation system with a static mixer.
4.44
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On September 4 & 5, 2018, Legendary Baking had pH violations, for which a Notice of
Violation was issued on October 11, 2018. On October 18, 2018, OCSD conducted a
Compliance Inspection and resampling during which it was determined that the pH
controller was malfunctioning, and a new one had been installed. On November 5,
2018, Legendary Baking had another pH violation, which was issued as a Notice of
Violation on January 9, 2019. On November 6 &7, 2018, OCSD conducted a follow-up
inspection and resampling during which it was determined that the circulation pump
inside the clarifier had been knocked over and unplugged. Legendary Baking hard-wired
the circulation pump to directly to an outside power box to eliminate the pump being
disconnected. Although OCSD's resampling results yielded positive results, data
submitted by Legendary Baking indicated multiple days where the pH continued to be
out of compliance. There seemed to be miscommunications regarding responsibilities
between the facility, and their environmental consultant, Shepard Bros. (i.e. pretreatment
system maintenance, troubleshooting, chemical inventory and supply, etc.).
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On January 10, 2019, OCSD issued a Compliance Requirement Letter directing
Legendary Baking to attend a compliance meeting later that month. On January 16,
2019, OCSD learned through a phone call that Legendary Baking's production had
discontinued in December 2018. On January 22, 2019, OCSD received a Close of
Business form and had terminated Legendary Baking's permit accordingly.
Linco Industries
Linco Industries, Inc. (Linco) is a small metal parts stripping and cleaning facility. Parts
are mostly automotive and motorcycle wheel rims and other accessories. Paint and
other non-metallic coatings are stripped in high temperature (550°F) salt bath (blend of
sodium hydroxide and sodium nitrate), or in cold (160°F) strip tanks (blend of
ethanolamine, n-methlpyrrolidone and dibasic ester). Parts from the salt stripping
process are rinsed in low volume overflow rinse, controlled and treated with a pH
monitor and sulfuric acid solution to reduce the pH down to the 9.0 — 10.0 range, then
pumped to an aboveground clarifier. Parts from the cold stripping process are rinsed by
a manual high-pressure spray and wastewater from the wash pad area is collected and
pumped into a tank for minimal solids settling and oil separation before pumping to the
aboveground clarifier. The first stage of the clarifier is used for final pH adjustment with
sulfuric acid and caustic. Water from the final stage of clarifier flows over a weir and into
a drum where sampling is conducted. Absorbent pads are used in the drum to remove
any excess oil.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On January 31, 2019, Linco had an oil &grease violation, for which a Notice of Violation
4.45
was issued on February 26, 2019. On March 12, 2019, OCSD conducted a Compliance
Inspection during which Linco discussed attributing the cause of violation to insufficient
changing of the oil & grease absorbent pads that are placed on top of the tanks. Linco
was directed to maintain a log sheet to record the frequency of replacing the absorbent
pads. Additionally, Linco indicated the possibility of installing an oil skimmer in the near
future.
OCSD will continue to monitor Linco's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly
basis.
LM Chrome Corporation (Permit No. 1-511361)
LM Chrome Corporation (LM Chrome) is an automotive wheel plating facility.
Wastewater generating operations include alkaline cleaning,zincate stripping,zincating,
acid activation, copper plating, electrocleaning, anti-tarnish, nickel plating, and chrome
plating, and associated rinses. LM Chrome utilizes a batch and a continuous
pretreatment system (PTS). The continuous PTS consists of cyanide destruction,
chromium reduction, neutralization, flocculation/settling, sludge holding, filter pressing,
and final clarification. The batch treatment tank is used for manually treating spent
cleaners.
In August 2017, LM Chrome had a cyanide (total) violation. Later that month, OCSD
conducted resampling and the results also showed a cyanide (total) violation. In
September 2017, LM Chrome sent OCSD a letter describing the corrective actions LM
Chrome planned to implement, which included close monitoring of the chemical feed
pumps to ensure delivery of the appropriate amount of chemicals for cyanide treatment;
ensuring that the pH and ORP probes are operating optimally; and sampling each
treated batch to ensure compliance (via analysis by an independent laboratory) prior to
discharging to the sewer. In October 2017, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection
and resampling during which OCSD noted that while LM Chrome was maintaining
cyanide batch discharge logs, each treated batch is only tested for compliance using
cyanide test strips. The resampling results showed compliance.
In January 2018, LM chrome had another cyanide violation. In May 2018, OCSD
conducted another compliance inspection and routine sampling. OCSD noted that LM
Chrome had started keeping daily logs of its pretreatment system operating parameters
including the pH and ORP settings and the cyanide test strip results of each treated
cyanide batch. The sample, however, yielded another cyanide violation.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On July 25, 2018, OCSD issued LM Chrome an Order to Cease Noncompliant
Discharges. On August 7, 2018, OCSD held a Compliance Meeting with LM Chrome to
discuss corrective action for cyanide pretreatment. On October 17 , 2018, OCSD sent
LM chrome a Compliance Requirement Letter directing the company to install an
4.46
automated cyanide destruction system, perform multi-day verification sampling following
system installation, and provide formal wastewater treatment training/certification for the
pretreatment operators. On November 28, 2018, OCSD conducted a follow-up
inspection and verified the installation of the automated cyanide destruction system.
The results of multi-day verification sampling showed compliance.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
LM Chrome had no further cyanide violations during this reporting period. OCSD will
continue to monitor LM Chrome's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
LSW Enterprises, LLC (Permit No. 1-521863)
LSW Enterprises, LLC (LSW) is a facility that receives, renders, and treats used cooking
oil and grease trap waste from food service establishments. LSW removes solid
particles and water from received waste; the used cooking oil and grease are then sold
on secondary markets or exported to refineries for biofuel production. The wastewater is
pH adjusted prior to discharge to the sewer.
In August 2017, the City of Anaheim reported solids blockage caused by the presence of
oil and grease in the sewer downstream of LSW's facility. In response to the City of
Anaheim's sewer blockage report, OCSD issued an Order to Cease Noncompliant
Discharges (Cease Order) requiring LSW to take immediate action to ensure compliance
with OCSD's Ordinance. In September 2017, OCSD held a compliance meeting with
LSW, in which LSW agreed to discontinue certain practices which were thought to be
causing the excessive discharge of oil and grease to the sewer.
In February 2018, the City of Anaheim reported another sewer blockage downstream of
LSW's facility. OCSD immediately conducted a Compliance Inspection, during which
OCSD observed an active flow of excessive amounts of oil and grease material
downstream of LSW's facility. OCSD issued a second Cease Order requiring LSW to
cease noncompliant discharge of excessive oil and grease into the OCSD's sewerage
system. OCSD also issued a Compliance Requirement Letter requiring LSW to install a
final holding tank and an effluent flow meter. LSW requested and OCSD granted an
extension to complete the installation by June 2018, which LSW had failed to comply
with.
OCSD conducted follow-up inspections of the facility from March through June 2018.
During each inspection, LSW attempted to interfere, delay, resist, or refuse site access
to OCSD staff. LSW had also refused to provide documentation related to the handling
and disposition of wastewater generated at the facility. Furthermore, LSW accepted and
treated material containing wastewater from outside OCSD's service area without prior
approval, which is a violation of the special conditions in LSW's permit and OCSD's
Ordinance. OCSD issued more Cease Orders in April and June 2018, and another
Compliance Requirements Letter in May 2018, in response to LSW's ongoing
4.47
noncompliance with permit and Ordinance conditions.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On July 11, 2018, OCSD held a Compliance Meeting with LSW and discussed the
permittee's failure to make progress towards compliance over an extended period of
time. As a result of their continued non-compliance, LSW ceased wastewater discharge
and requested to discontinue the Class 1 permit, which became void as of July 19,
2018. LSW's permit is void and it is OCSD's understanding that wastewater discharge
from the facility has ceased.
Marukome USA, Inc. (Permit No. 1-141023)
Marukome USA, Inc. (Marukome) is a manufacturer of miso paste from cooked
soybeans and rice. The facility also makes a small amount of miso dressing produced
from a vinegar base. Wastewater is generated from the draining of washed and soaked
soybeans and rice and from the cleaning of the equipment used in the production
operation. Cleaning occurs at least once a day and includes the food processing
equipment as well as the transporting bins. Wastewater is pH adjusted prior to discharge
to the sewer.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On August 8, 2018, Marukome had a pH violation, for which a Notice of Violation was
issued on August 22, 2018. On September 6, 2018, OCSD conducted a Compliance
Inspection during which Marukome attributed the pH violation to an empty caustic soda
barrel. During its investigation, Marukome discovered that the caustic soda barrel which
is used to adjust pH was at its empty point. The line was temporarily shut off as there
was not an extra drum available at hand. This caused pH to drop to noncompliant levels.
Marukome submitted a corrective action letter indicating that they will have a
representative employee who will closely monitor caustic soda levels and inform
management if the levels drop to a level that can cause pH violations. Additionally,
Marukome will keep an extra drum near the current drum to eliminate lag time in
between caustic change-outs.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
Marukome had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to
monitor Marukome's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Meggitt, Inc. (Permit No. 1-600006)
Meggitt, Inc. (Meggitt) produces sensing and monitoring systems that measure physical
parameters in the extreme environments of aircraft, space vehicles, power generators,
4.48
nuclear, oil and gas installations, and test laboratories. Processes used in
manufacturing operations include, but are not limited to, machining, sawing, coating,
sandblasting, welding, brazing, and metal finishing. Parts worked on are made of
Inconel, stainless steel and tungsten.Wastewater-generating processes include electro-
polishing, passivation, etching, filament cleaning, ceramic dicing, ceramic dimensional
polishing, ceramic tumbling, nickel bath plating, parts washing, and emergency only
discharge of non-contact cooling water from the annealing furnace operations.
Wastewater generated from the ceramic dimensional polishing operation, as well as the
spent silver nitrate solution from the ceramic tumbling are wastehauled offsite. Rinses
from these and the other wastewater generating operations go to a three-stage
polypropylene aboveground tank, in which sodium hydroxide is added in the first and
third compartments for pH adjustment, as most of the wastestreams are acidic in nature.
pH-adjusted effluent is collected in a 750-gallon holding tank to facilitate batch discharge
sampling.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
In the month of March 2019, Meggitt had lead and silver monthly discharge limit
violations, for which a Notice of Violation was issued on June 7, 2019. On June 13,
2019, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection during which Meggitt specified that the
only two possible sources for the exceedances are the rinse associated with the silver
plating and ceramic dicing machine. OCSD directed Meggitt to implement an additional
pre-cleaning step at the rinse associated with silver and the ceramic dicing machine. The
permittee is currently in the process of buying a filtration system for the dicing machine
to further reduce the lead concentration in the wastewater. In the month of June 2019,
Meggitt had another lead monthly discharge limit violation,for which a Notice of Violation
will be issued in the next quarter.
OCSD will continue to monitor Meggitt's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly
basis.
Murrietta Circuits (Permit No. 1-521811)
Murrietta Circuits (Murrietta) is a printed circuit board manufacturer. Pretreatment
consists of an ion exchange (IX)system for treatment of select rinse water streams and
a batch hydroxide precipitation system for handling spent process chemicals plus drag-
out rinses and IX regenerant waste. The IX system effluent is adjusted for pH before
discharge to the sewer.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On December 10, 2018, Murrietta Circuits had a pH violation.
4.49
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On January 15, 2019, OCSD issued a Notice of Violation for the pH violation. On
January 30, 2019, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection during which Murrietta
indicated that the violation was due to formation of deposits on the pH probe in the
continuous pH adjustment system. On February 26, 2019, Murrietta submitted a
corrective action letter indicating that they have added a new mixer, a chemical pump
and a pH neutralization system to the final tank to monitor and adjust the pH before
wastewater is routed to the sewer to prevent future incidents. Additionally, a log sheet
was created to record pH probe cleaning and calibration dates and is posted next to the
pH adjustment system.
OCSD will continue to monitor Murrietta's discharge and compliance status on a
quarterly basis.
Nalco Cal Water, LLC (Permit No. 1-521748)
Nalco Cal Water, LLC (Nalco) performs ion exchange tank regeneration on both cation,
anion, and mixed bed resins. Cation regeneration uses acidic solutions and anion
regeneration uses alkaline solutions in the regeneration process. Wastewater from the
regeneration process is discharged to floor drains, collected, and pumped to a 1025-
gallon collection tank where it is directed into either an acidic or alkaline wastewater
holding tank based on the pH set point of 8.5. Water is then blended and discharged
through the sample point. Nalco stated the columns regenerated are only used in
purifying fresh incoming city water, and no columns are used in treatment of industrial
waste streams.
In September 2017, during a downstream operation along Petra Lane in Placentia,
OCSD noted that significant variations in pH were observed with continuous pH data
loggers. It was determined that the pH of wastewater discharged from Nalco exceeded
both the high and low limits, with pH concentrations recorded as high as 13.71 S.U. and
as low as 0.81 S.U. In October 2017, OCSD issued an Order to Cease Noncompliant
Discharges to Nalco. OCSD also conducted a Compliance Inspection, which confirmed
issues with overflow of non-neutralized wastewater through the sample point to the
sewer, followed by a compliance meeting with Nalco where the company provided plans
to rectify their wastewater discharge and treatment issues. During the meeting, Nalco
provided OCSD with a proposal to address interim plans, as well as long-term plans, for
compliance. Interim solutions included modification of pH set points and calibration
procedures, continuous pH recording, and corrections to spill containment overflow.
Long-term solutions included a timeline to install a reconfigured pretreatment system
that would operate as a batch system rather than operating continuously.
In December 2017, OCSD held a second compliance meeting with Nalco to get an
update on the plans, and to bring the Nalco's parent company, Ecolab, into discussions
for the long-term solution. Nalco presented updated plans for a new batch treatment
4.50
system, complete with monitoring points installed for the purpose of maintaining
compliance with the pH discharge limits.
In January 2018, OCSD issued a Compliance Requirement Letter to approve Nalco's
project timeline and implementation of their new treatment system. Although Nalco
did not meet the anticipated installation completion and system operational timeline
of April 2018 due to equipment procurement issues, the company has made
considerable progress in implementing various interim controls to stay in compliance.
Nalco made biweekly progress reports as required and kept OCSD updated in
advance of all operational changes.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On July 23, 2018, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection to verify the updated
treatment system configuration and implementation of new treatment. The company
had made the required corrections and is expected to have greater control over the
pH of their discharge.
OCSD will continue to monitor Nalco's discharge and compliance status on a
quarterly basis.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
Nalco had no further cyanide violations during this reporting period.
National Construction Rentals (Permit No. 1-600652)
National Construction Rentals (National) is a supplier of temporary fencing,
barricades, portable toilets, restroom trailers, mobile storage containers, and
temporary power poles. Wastewater is generated from the washing and cleaning of
portable toilets and restroom trailers. The wastewater is routed to a three-stage
underground clarifier before discharge to the sewer.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On February 20, 2019 and March 12, 2019, National had pH violations for which
Notices of Violation were issued on May 10, 2019. On May 10, 2019, OCSD issued
National a Compliance Requirement Letter to attend a Compliance Meeting to discuss
the non-compliant pH discharges, as well as the failure to submit several proposals and
deliverables between December 2018 and February 2019. On June 4, 2019, OCSD
held the Compliance Meeting with National during which National indicated that the
source of the pH violations was a chemical containing hydrochloric acid used in the
portable toilet washing process. National had since discontinued the use of the chemical
from the washing process. On June 13, 2019, OCSD issued a Compliance
Requirements Letter directing National to install an automated pH adjustment system,
4.51
propose a stormwater mitigation plan to prevent stormwater from entering the three-
stage clarifier as prohibited by OCSD's Ordinance, and submit a Slug Discharge Control
Plan. On June 25, 2019, OCSD issued an extension to the due dates listed in the
Compliance Requirements Letter.
OCSD will continue to monitor National's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly
basis.
O.C. Waste & Recycling (Permit No. 1-141018)
O.C. Waste & Recycling discharges condensate generated from the Coyote Canyon
Landfill gas collection system and spring water collected in French drains onsite. The
site has a batch treatment tank equipped with a manual pH adjustment system utilizing
sodium hydroxide to adjust the pH of the gas condensate as needed. Bleach
(Purechlor) is also added to the gas condensate to control odor.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On March 1, 2019, O.C. Waste & Recycling had a pH violation, for which a Notice of
Violation was issued on April 3, 2019. On April 17, 2019, OCSD conducted a
Compliance Inspection during which O.C. Waste & Recycling indicated that the
stratification of pH levels within the condensate tank and lack of proper mixing caused
the pH violation. OCSD directed O.C. Waste & Recycling to update the Condensate
Treatment Procedure to include a pre-mixing step to resolve the issue of stratification of
pH levels within the tank, as well as measurement of pH prior to discharge to determine
if pH is within compliant levels or further treatment is required. On May 6, 2019, O.C.
Waste & Recycling submitted the updated procedure indicating that they have
implemented the initial mixing step before measurement of pH. Additionally, O.C. Waste
& Recycling has increased the pH level treatment threshold and changed the pH probes
calibration procedure to further achieve compliance.
OCSD will continue to monitor O.C. Waste & Recycling's discharge and compliance
status on a quarterly basis.
Patio and Door Outlet, Inc. (Permit No. 1-521783)
Patio and Door Outlet, Inc. (Patio) manufactures and sells high-end patio furniture.
Aluminum tubing and sheeting are cut, bent, formed and welded in the manufacture of
the framing for chairs and tables. After assembly, frames are washed, iron-phosphated,
sealed, and powder-coated in various colors and textures. Patio also manufactures
padding and furniture coverings from foam sheets and fabric covers. Wastewater from
the iron-phosphate rinse is routed through a three-stage clarifier where it is pH adjusted
prior to discharge to the sewer.
4.52
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On February 21, 2019, Patio had a molybdenum violation, for which a Notice of
Violation was issued on April 3, 2019. On April 24, 2019, OCSD conducted a
Compliance Inspection during which Patio investigated the violation and found that the
iron-phosphate solution, which is used to prepare metal products for powder-coating,
contains molybdenum. Patio purchased a new metal preparation solution that does not
contain molybdenum and waste-hauled the molybdenum-bearing wastewater prior to
restarting the powder coating preparation system. No violations have occurred since
implementation of these corrective actions.
OCSD staff will continue to monitor Patio's discharge and compliance status during
the next report period.
Patriot Wastewater, LLC (Permit No. 1-521861)
Patriot Wastewater, LLC (Patriot) is a centralized wastewater treatment (CWT) facility
that accepts and treats non-hazardous waste from off-site generators. Patriot treats
both CWT and non-CWT wastewater (as defined in 40 CFR 437.2), under separate
permits and discharge points. As a subpart D facility, Patriot is able to treat wastes from
Subparts A, B, and C: Metals, Oil, and Organics Treatment and Recovery. Depending
on the wastewater that is received, Patriot can employ one of multiple on-site
technologies including: (1) batch heavy metals precipitation; (2)oil water separation with
emulsion breaker; and (3)granular activated carbon,treated organo-clay, and bag filters
for organics treatment.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On December 5, 2018, Patriot had a titanium violation. In addition, Patriot had a
titanium monthly average limit violation in the month of December 2018.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On March 12, 2019, OCSD issued a Notice of Violation for the December 2018 titanium
violation. Patriot investigated the violation and reported that they received two batches
that had titanium and the titanium concentrations were typical for those loads. Patriot
stated that no abnormalities were encountered with the treatment process or with the
internal testing. Patriot's corrective measures included increasing internal testing
frequency and increasing the safety margin for the treatment process from 20% to 25%.
OCSD staff will continue to monitor Patriot's discharge and compliance status during
the next reporting period.
4.53
Performance Powder, Inc. (Permit No. 1-011115)
Performance Powder precleans and powder coats aluminum and cold rolled steel parts
brought in by outside customers, including very large and oversized parts such as metal
cabinets and construction framework. Cleaning and surface treating process is
performed in an automated conveyorized 6-stage wash line which includes alkaline
cleaning, iron phosphate surface conversion followed by city water rinse, DI water rinse
and RO water rinse. Wastewater is generated from the rinsing stages of the wash line
and is pumped to a 3-stage above ground clarifier where it drains to the sewer from the
final stage.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On October 9, 2018, Performance Powder had a molybdenum violation, for which a
Notice of Violation was issued on October 22, 2018. On October 30, 2018, OCSD
conducted a Compliance Inspection and resampling during which it was concluded that
overflow from the iron phosphate tank was the cause of the violation. Sodium Molybdate
was present in the chemical used in the iron phosphate solution. Performance Powder
proposed using an alternate non-molybdenum base chemical as a corrective action.
Additionally, Performance Powder replaced the float valve in the iron phosphate tank to
avoid future overflows. The resampling results showed compliance.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
Performance Powder had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will
continue to monitor Performance Powder's discharge and compliance status on a
quarterly basis.
Pioneer Circuits, Inc. (Permit No. 1-011262)
Pioneer Circuits, Inc. (Pioneer) is a manufacturer of multilayer rigid, rigid-flex, and
flexible printed circuit boards and assemblies. The manufacturing of a multilayer
board generally proceeds by cutting the copper clad materials, photoresist
application, inner-layer circuit imaging, resist developing, cupric chloride etching, and
alkaline resist stripping. This is followed by surface prep (Cobra Bond), lamination,
and drilling. The holes are cleaned by either permanganate or plasma etching and
made conductive through electroless copper plating. Outer-layer circuit development
is conducted by pattern plate process steps including photoresist application, circuit
imaging, resist developing, copper plating, tin/lead resist plating, ammonium etching,
and solder stripping. Solder mask application and surface finishing such as hot air
levelling or fuse-oil reflow complete Pioneers' wet process operations. Nickel/gold
plating, if required, is outsourced.
The effluent discharge at Pioneer is generated by aqueous fume scrubbing, boiler
blowdown, reverse osmosis reject, various spent process solutions, and the
4.54
associated rinse wastestreams.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On June 17, 2019, Pioneer had a copper violation. OCSD will issue a Notice of
Violation and conduct a compliance inspection during the next quarter.
Precious Metals Plating Co., Inc. (Permit No. 1-011265)
Precious Metals Plating Co., Inc. (PMP) is a precious metals plating job shop that
provides specialty plating services for aerospace, electronics, industrial, medical, and
military applications. Customer supplied parts include assorted items such as
connectors, contacts, fasteners, pins, seals, switches, washers, and other commercial
devices. The wet processing of the smaller bulk parts is conducted primarily through
barrel plating techniques, although, a particular part or finish may occasionally require
racking or wiring. The majority of rinse wastestreams are recycled through a
recirculating I.X. system, therefore, PMP's effluent is generated primarily by the chelated
rinse wastestreams which are discharged after going through a continuous I.X.
pretreatment system utilizing special chelated resins.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On April 16, 2019, OCSD issued a Notice of Violation for the monthly average of
January 2019 silver sampling results that exceeded the monthly average limit. Precious
Metals Plating could not determine the source of the violation, and it was noted that most
sampling results prior had been well below monthly average limits and daily average
limits, as were samples following the month in violation.
OCSD staff will continue to monitor Precious Metals Plating's discharge and
compliance status during the next reporting period.
Precon, Inc. (Permit No. 1-021581)
Precon Inc. (Precon) performs general machining including band saw cutting, milling,
grinding, deburring and drilling. Tumble and vibratory deburring are the two wet
processes that generate wastewater. Rest of operations use a closed circulation system.
Precon has a trench system that directs wastewater into a three-stage clarifier. Water
from the last stage of clarifier is pumped through a bag filter prior to discharge to the
sewer.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On February 26, 2019 and March 13, 2019, Precon had copper violations, for which
Notices of Violation were issued on April 3, 2019 and April 4, 2019, respectively. On
4.55
April 9, 2019, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection during which Precon indicated
that the source of the violation was the unusually large batch of brass parts that was
processed around the time of the violation. On June 12, 2019, OCSD issued a
Compliance Requirement Letter directing Precon to evaluate the installed pretreatment
system and propose improvements to achieve compliance by mid-August 2019.
OCSD will continue to monitor Precon's discharge and compliance status for copper on
a monthly basis.
Primatex Industries, Inc. (Permit No. 1-031036)
Primatex Industries, Inc. (Primatex) performs rotary screen printing of fabrics. Water-
based inks are applied to fabric by means of perforated print design screens using one
of two rotary printers. The facility also has two Sanforizing machines (a method of
stretching, shrinking, and fixing the woven cloth in both length and width, before cutting
to reduce the shrinkage which would otherwise occur after washing), two drying
machines to dry printed cloth, a sanding machine (used to break some of the small fibers
on the exterior of the material which teases them out to produce a soft feel), a crinkling
machine (to artificially wrinkle the cloth), and two industrial washing and drying
machines, used to test the fabric quality when the cloth is supplied by the customer.
Wastewater is generated by the washing of the printers and the washing of cloth in the
industrial washing machines. Wastewater is collected in an outside sump from where it
is pumped through a lint removal unit then to the inside of a rotating drum filter
constructed of screen material. The lint is trapped on the inside, while wastewater
passes through the screen and is discharged to a three-stage underground clarifierwith
sample box. A timed spray rinse above the drum cleans the outside of debris, which
falls to a screen located directly below the drum.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On July 3, 2018, Primatex had a zinc violation, for which a Notice of Violation was
issued on July 12, 2018. An appeal to the Notice of Violation was received by OCSD on
July 27, 2018, but it was denied on August 9, 2018 since OCSD's archive sample test
result was consistent with the original test result. On August 6, 2018, OCSD conducted
resampling followed by a Compliance Inspection on August 14, 2018. During both the
compliance inspection and resampling, OCSD reviewed all available material safety data
sheets but could not identify the source of the zinc violation. It was later discovered that
a discharge agent called Parolite (used in the production of bright prints on dark fabrics,
the main ingredient being Zinc formaldehyde sulfoxylate), which had not been used in
over two years, may have been added to the production process by mistake. The
remaining Parolite was returned to Primatex's chemical supplier.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
Primatex had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to
4.56
monitor Primatex's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Republic Waste Services (Permit No. 1-521827)
Republic Waste Services washes the inside and outside of trash bins in a contained and
partially covered area in this facility. Washwater is routed through a three-stage clarifier
before discharge to the sewer. Clarifier maintenance includes regular skimming and
annual pump out of the sludge buildup.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On October 3, 2018, Republic Waste Services had cadmium, copper, zinc and lead
violations, for which a Notice of Violation was issued on October 25, 2018. On
November 2, 2018, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection during which Republic
Waste Services indicated that no operational changes had been made onsite and,
therefore, they were not able to identify any internal source for the violations. The
company indicated that the only possible source would be the illicit discharge of
materials, such as sand blasting dust or batteries, in the trash bins that were washed at
the time of the violations. Republic Waste Services pumped out the clarifier on
November 6, 2018 as part of their corrective action. On November 8, 2018, OCSD
conducted resampling and the results showed compliance.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
Republic Waste Services had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD
will continue to monitor Republic's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Safran Electronics & Defense Avionics USA, LLC (Permit No. 1-571304)
Safran Electronics & Defense, Avionics USA LLC (Safran) is a medium size facility
specializing in fabrication of pushbutton switches, indicators, and panel displays for
aerospace, commercial aviation, and military/defense applications. The wet
processes for surface treatment and cleaning/deburring include: vibratory deburring,
caustic etch surface treatment line, legend marking of finished housings are screen
painted and/or applied with a laser burner, soldering or wave soldering, ultrasonic
cleaner (plastic parts), and an aqueous flux removal system with some miscellaneous
cleanup as well. Wastewater drains through a two-pipe manifold into a two-stage
above-ground clarifier located outside the building. Safran presently pumps out both
chambers of the clarifier every two to three weeks.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On September 6, 2018, Safran had a zinc violation, for which a Notice of Violation was
issued on October 9, 2018. On October 17, 2018, OCSD conducted a Compliance
4.57
Inspection during which OCSD has determined that the most likely source of zinc was
the deburring operations. Safran agreed to begin using bag filters on all the effluent
from those units to remove any particulate zinc. Subsequent sampling showed
compliance.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
Safran had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD staff will continue to
monitor Safran's discharge and compliance status during the next reporting period.
Sanmina Corporation (Airway & Redhill) (Permit Nos. 1-061008 & 1-061009)
Sanmina Corporation (Sanmina) operates two large scale, full-service printed circuit
board shop in adjacent facilities in Costa Mesa. Industrial wastewater at Sanmina is
generated from the processing of copper laminates into printed circuit
boards. Sanmina operates a continuous pretreatment system which includes pH
adjustment and multiple ion exchange resin beds, along with batch treatment (pH
adjustment, flocculation, clarification followed by sludge dewatering with a filter press)
is also performed on spent solutions including ion exchange backflush. Some
concentrated wastestreams are wastehauled offsite.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On October 16, 2018 OCSD inspection staff attempted to conduct routine quarterly
inspection and sampling at Sanmina but the inspector was asked to provide official
identification (driver's license or passport) beyond the government official identification
credentials issued by OCSD. On October 22, 2018, OCSD issued Compliance
Requirement Letters to Sanmina reminding the company to comply with right to entry
requirements in accordance with Permit Nos. 1-061008 & 1-061009 and OCSD
Ordinance. If unable to permit entry without additional identification in accordance with
third-party government or contracts, OCSD requested Sanmina to provide
documentation demonstrating this requirement by November 7, 2018.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
Sanmina did not limit access to OCSD staff after receipt of the letter. No further
enforcement is necessary.
Shur-Lok Company (Permit No. 1-600297)
Shur-Lok Company (Shur-Lok) manufactures mechanical fastening systems for
commercial and defense aerospace industries. During the manufacture of metal parts,
various finishing processes are used and include tumbling, polishing, surface
preparation, and passivation. All the wastewater generated from the metal finishing
4.58
operations is routed to an evaporator where most of the liquid is evaporated and the
residue hauled away as hazardous waste.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On July 26, 2018, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection to investigate the sewer
sediment build-up downstream of Shur-Lok's facility that was reported to OCSD by the
Irvine Ranch Water District. During the inspection, OCSD evaluated Shur-Lok's
operations and the sources of wastewater discharge onsite and was able to identify the
source of the sewer sediment build-up to several bypasses within Shur-Lok's facility.
One bypass was from Shur-Lok's water jet operations and other was from two new tee-
splits routed to floor drains inside the facility. Furthermore, OCSD observed that Shur-
Lok's pretreatment equipment was undersized.
While unrelated to the sewer sediment build-up, OCSD discovered an uncovered
underground sump at the rear corner of the property which was receiving and
discharging storm water run-off from Shur-Lok's parking lot into the sewer. On August
20, 2018, OCSD issued a Compliance Requirements Letter directing Shur-Lok to take
the required corrective measures to ensure long-term compliance with OCSD's
wastewater discharge regulations. On September 12, 2018, Shur-Lok informed OCSD
that all required actions have been completed. On September 13, 2018, OCSD
conducted a follow-up Compliance Inspection and confirmed that the bypasses have
been eliminated and collected storm water run-off has been re-routed to the onsite
evaporator. Shur-Lok has also added a new laminar filtering system to their
pretreatment equipment and all the potential wastewater from the water jet operations
now goes through the evaporator and not to the sample point.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
Shur-Lok had no further non-compliance issues during this reporting period. OCSD will
continue to monitor Shur-Lok's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
South Coast Baking, LLC (Permit No. 1-600565)
South Coat Baking, LLC (South Coast Baking) manufactures frozen cookie dough. The
manufacturing process uses ingredients such as flour, sugar, chocolate, butter, and
flavors regularly. The facility also uses fruits such as raisins and cranberries.
Wastewater is generated during cleaning/sanitation activities.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On April 3, 2019 and April 4, 2019, South Coast Baking had pH violations, for which a
Notice of Violation was issued on May 9, 2019. On May 21, 2019, OCSD conducted a
Compliance Inspection during which South Coast Baking indicated that the clarifier was
4.59
not pumped out as per the company's schedule; hence the poor maintenance of the
clarifier resulted in the pH violations. During the inspection, OCSD reminded South
Coast Baking that the company may be required to install pretreatment equipment if their
facility's discharge continues to be noncompliant. On May 29, 2019, South Coast Baking
submitted their corrective action plan, which included changing the wastehauler to
maintain the clarifier frequently and implementing a daily pH level monitoring onsite.
OCSD will continue to monitor South Coast Baking's discharge and compliance status
on a quarterly basis.
SPS Technologies LLC, DBA Cherry Aerospace (Permit No. 1-511381)
SPS Technologies LLC, DBA Cherry Aerospace (Cherry) is categorized as a non-ferrous
metal former for titanium and nickel-cobalt, an aluminum former, and a metal finisher.
Cherry conducts cold forming techniques to produce aerospace fasteners from materials
made of aluminum, inconel, monel, stainless steel, and titanium. Cherry specializes in
government and aerospace parts and is a major supplier of blind rivets. Wastewater is
generated from plating, anodizing, washing, and other metal finishing operations, as well
as forging, rolling, and drawing operations, and scrubber water. Cherry has high
capacity segregated treatment trains, and all wastewater is discharged through the
above ground flow monitored weir after-bay.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On June 7, 2018, Cherry had a cyanide (total) violation, for which a Notice of Violation
was issued on July 26, 2018. On August 7, 2018, OCSD conducted a Compliance
Inspection during which corrective actions were required to be completed by the
company. Corrective actions taken by Cherry included proper record keeping and
calibration of equipment, and more frequent ion exchange replacement to prevent a
reoccurrence of this violation. The company was also asked to prepare updated facility
drawings and process diagrams, as well as treatment procedures. On December 4,
2018, Cherry had a cadmium violation, for which a Notice of Violation was issued on
December 17, 2018. In addition, Cherry had cadmium monthly average discharge limit
violation in the month of December 2018.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On January 29, 2019, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection to verify updated
process and treatment drawings submitted by Cherry and to confirm implementation of
the other required items. On March 12, 2019, OCSD issued a Notice of Violation for the
December 2018 cadmium monthly violation.
Cherry had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to
monitor Cherry's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
4.60
Star Manufacturing LLC, dba Commercial Metal Forming (Permit No. 1-600653)
Star Manufacturing LLC, dba Commercial Metal Forming (Star) is a metal forming shop
that specializes in stamping and forming metal tank heads on mechanical and hydraulic
presses for use in the manufacture of vessels. Star's ancillary operations include
plasma cutting metal blanks, plasma and oxyacetylene trimming, metal heat treating,
pressure washing finished tank heads, welding, steam cleaning, and part washing.
Wastewater is generated from the steam cleaning and washing of production pieces,
which are typically coated with lubricant. Wastewater is collected in an underground
sump and then pumped to an equalization tank from which the wastewater is gravity-fed
through bag filters before discharge to the sewer.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On February 15 and March 21, 2019, Star had oil &grease violations, for which Notices
of Violation were issued on April 4 and June 3, 2019, respectively. On March 21,2019,
OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection to determine if Star had made any
improvements to its existing treatment system. Star personnel stated that they were
continuing to research various technologies to ensure long term compliance with their
permit limits and requirements. Star was aware that the use of bag filters is inadequate
as primary treatment to remove oil and grease. On April 9, 2019, OCSD issued a
Compliance Requirements Letter requiring the submittal of a waste management
proposal by May 6, 2019, and installation of the proposed pretreatment system by June
15, 2019 after acceptance by OCSD. While Star met the deadline for submitting the
proposal, they installed the system without prior acceptance from OCSD. Star installed
a 7" diameter Multimedia filter tank with 7-14 Mesh Clinoptilolite Zeolite granules
downstream of the existing 25-micron bag filters. The zeolite multimedia filter tank is
equipped with a control valve that accommodates a backwash cycle to remove
accumulated contaminants from the zeolite. However, the effectiveness of the
backwash cycle using untreated gravity-fed water is unclear.
OCSD staff will continue to monitor Star's discharge and compliance status during the
next reporting period.
Statek Corporation (Main) (Permit No. 1-021664)
Statek Corporation (Main) (Statek) manufactures surface mount and through hole, ultra-
miniature quartz crystals and oscillators. Statek's products are utilized in
communications, medical electronics, industrial controls, and precision military
application devices. The wafer fab long and short lines produce wastewater which is
treated using an ammonia pH adjustment system prior to discharge to the sewer.
4.61
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On February 1, 2019, Statek had a pH violation, for which a Notice of Violation was
issued on February 26, 2019. On March 26, 2019, OCSD conducted a Compliance
Inspection during which Statek reported that maintenance was being performed on the
pH probe on the day the violation occurred. Statek indicated that no equipment
malfunctions or chemical inventory deficiencies that might have adversely affected the
pH adjustment system were encountered during the time of the violation. Statek was
advised to schedule maintenance during days when impact on treatment system
effectiveness would be minimal to ensure compliance during wastewater discharge.
OCSD staff will continue to monitor Statek's discharge and compliance status during the
next reporting period.
Stepan Company (Permit No. 1-021674)
Stepan Company (Stepan) manufactures surfactants, for use in consumer and
industrial cleaning compounds. Surfactants are used in the manufacture of
shampoos, dishwasher and laundry detergents. Manufacturing utilizes three
processes: continuous falling film sulfonation, detergent blending by batch
processing of alkanolamides, and detergent blending by batch processing of betaine.
Wastewater is generated from softener regeneration, warehouse rinses, wash down,
tank calibration, cooling tower bleed, SOs scrubber bleed, and ammonia scrubber
bleed. The pretreatment system consists of a 21,000-gallon round underground
sump/clarifier. The wastewater is commingled and mixed by an agitator. Caustic
soda is used to adjust the pH and defoamer is also added. Wastewater is then
pumped to one of two tanks (20,000 and 24,000 gallons), where it is mixed using a
recirculation pump.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On June 1, 2018, Stepan had a 1,4-dioxane violation for which a Notice of Violation was
issued on July 18, 2018. On August 9, 2018, OCSD conducted a Compliance
Inspection during which OCSD noted that Stepan had installed pretreatment equipment
for removal of 1,4-dioxane, which was based on a successful system in use at their east
coast facility.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
Stepan had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to
monitor Stepan's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis,
4.62
Superior Plating (1-021090)
Superior Plating is a medium-sized plating shop serving both aerospace (95%) and
commercial (5%) customers. Wastewater generating operations include acid
activation, alkaline cleaning, alkaline tin plating, black chromate, bright dip, bright
nickel plating, bright silver plating, bright tin plating, cadmium plating, chem film, clear
chromate, copper plate, copper strike, electroless nickel plating, fuse oil, gold plating,
hot D.I. rinsing, liquid water displacement, matte silver plating, nickel plating, nickel
strike, nitric dip, olive drab, passivation, permanganate (descale), rinsing
(countercurrent, running, & static), silver strike, tin / lead plating, yellow chromate,
and zincate.
Superior operates a batch pretreatment system, which consists of pH adjustment,
cyanide destruct, chemical precipitation, clarification, coagulation, filter press and final
effluent filtration. The non-metal bearing wastestreams undergo pH adjustment only.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
From January 28, 2019 through February 28, 2019, OCSD conducted covert
downstream monitoring of Superior Plating's discharge during which cadmium, copper,
lead, nickel, zinc and pH violations were detected. On March 27, 2019, OCSD issued an
Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges informing Superior Plating of OCSD's
intention to initiate administrative proceedings against Superior Plating based on the
discharge violations detected during the downstream monitoring. On April 16, 2019,
OCSD held a Compliance Meeting with Superior during which the company chose to
enter into a Settlement Agreement with OCSD to settle the violations and avoid
administrative proceedings. The Settlement Agreement was issued on May 29, 2019,
with a $50,000 fine.
OCSD will issue a Probation Order during the next reporting period to give Superior time
to conduct a proper evaluation of its pretreatment system and to make any necessary
improvements to achieve consistent compliance.
Tayco Engineering, Inc. (Permit No. 1-031012)
Tayco Engineering, Inc. (Tayco)manufactures temperature sensors,flexible heaters,flat
cables, high temperature heaters, and pressure switches for use in aerospace, satellite,
military, and other general aviation applications. Rinsewater generated from the
scrubbing of nickel and copper alloys is recirculated for approximately one week before
discharge to a collection tank, then pumped over to the pretreatment system. Tayco
uses a batch treatment system (hydroxide precipitation) for the etcher and scrub sink
rinsewaters, spent developer/stripper solutions and rinses, and etcher fume scrubber
bleed off. Spent etching solution and resist stripper solids are wastehauled offsite.
4.63
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On December 19, 2018, Tayco had a copper violation. In addition, Tayco had a copper
monthly average limit violation in the month of December 2018.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On January 18, 2019, OCSD issued a Notice of Violation for the copper violation.
On February 27, 2019, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection during which
Tayco attributed the violation to a wastewater treatment operator forgetting to check
the wastewater for copper prior to batch discharge. Tayco's corrective action
included additional checks for copper prior to batch discharge and better
recordkeeping through a more detailed batch discharge log.
On March 12, 2019, OCSD issued a Notice of Violation for the December 2018
copper monthly violation. OCSD will continue to monitor Tayco's discharge and
compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Taylor-Dunn Manufacturinq Co. (1-021123)
Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Co. (Taylor-Dunn) manufactures industrial electric utility
carts, lifts and load carriers. Angle iron, flat bar and round stock are all cut, and all sheet
steel is lasered and bent, to part number dimensions. The parts are welded into different
sub-assemblies and then welded together for different product lines. Then the parts are
sent to the chip and grind area where they are wire-wheeled and slightly grinded. Next,
the parts are either sent out for powder coating or kept in-house for painting. The parts
are washed with an iron phosphate solution and dried prior to painting. The finished
painted product then goes to the assembly line for the installation of wheels, tires,
motors, electronics, batteries, brakes, and upholstery.
Wastewater is generated from the iron phosphate conversion coating line and the
outdoor wash pad used for rinsing parts. Pretreatment at Taylor-Dunn is limited to
clarification.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On January 4, 2019, Taylor-Dunn had a zinc violation, for which a Notice of Violation
was issued on February 26, 2019. In addition, Taylor-Dunn had a zinc month average
limit violation in the month of January 2019. On April 2, 2019, OCSD conducted a
Compliance Inspection. The only apparent source of zinc is galvanized steel in the form
of grinder waste from the area adjacent to the wash pad. While there is plastic sheeting
intended to keep the grindings in that area some may be migrating to the adjacent area.
OCSD suggested that Taylor-Dunn pump out the clarifier to remove any accumulated
zinc-containing material and add a bag filter to the inlet pipe to the clarifier.
4.64
On April 16, 2019, OCSD issued a Notice of Violation for the January 2019 zinc
monthly violation. OCSD will continue to monitor Taylor Dunn's discharge and
compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Thompson Energy Resources, LLC (Permit No. 1-521773)
Thompson Energy Resources, LLC (Thompson Energy) produces crude oil by
separating ground water from the oil/groundwater mixture extracted from multiple wells
onsite through heating and chemical treatment. Resultant water is discharged to the
sewer system.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On July 17, 2018, Thompson Energy had an oil &grease violation, for which a Notice of
Violation was issued on August 20, 2018. On September 12,2018, OCSD conducted a
Compliance Inspection and resampling during which Thompson Energy identified the
source of violation to a bad batch of chemicals coupled with high temperature
processing. On September 14, 2018, Thompson Energy submitted a corrective action
report indicating that Thompson Energy had replaced its chemical vendor and
implemented new chemicals at the facility. The resampling results showed compliance.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On June 13, 2019, Thompson Energy had another oil & grease violation. OCSD will
issue a Notice of Violation and conduct a compliance inspection during the next quarter.
TTM Technologies North America, LLC (Coronado) (Permit No. 1-521859)
TTM Technologies North America, LLC (TTM Technologies) is a large scale, full-
service printed circuit board shop. Wastewater is generated from the processing of
copper laminates into printed circuit boards. Wet processes include copper plating,
electroless copper plating, nickel/gold plating, solder mask, alkaline cleaning, acid
cleaning, scrubbing, developing, resist stripping, tin stripping, etching, screen
cleaning, oxide coating, and miscellaneous cleanup/mop water. Rinse schemes
practiced at the facility include significant use of static rinses in addition to running
rinses. TTM Technologies operates a continuous pretreatment system to treat low
concentration wastestreams and it consists of pH adjustment and multiple ion
exchange resin beds, with a large portion of the effluent reused onsite. Batch
treatment is performed on spent solutions and ion exchange backflush and it consists
of pH adjustment, flocculation, clarification followed by sludge dewatering with a filter
press. Concentrated wastestreams (etchant, spent plating solutions) are
wastehauled offsite.
4.65
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On August 17, 2018 and on September 9 & 21, 2018, TTM Technologies had copper
violations, for which a Notices of Violation were issued on October 2, 2018 and
November 8, 2018, respectively. On October 17, 2018, OCSD issued a Compliance
Requirements Letter requiring TTM to implement corrective actions and attend a
Compliance Meeting. On October 31, 2018, OCSD held the Compliance Meeting with
TTM, during which the company submitted information detailing efforts to review their
pretreatment system and improvements that had been implemented up to the meeting.
OCSD required TTM Technologies to submit an updated pretreatment system diagram
and operations and maintenance manual (O&M) by December 1, 2018, which was
extended to the following quarter due to delays.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
In January 2019, TTM submitted its O&M Manual which contained the updated
pretreatment system schematics. On June 19, 2019, TTM had another copper violation.
OCSD will issue a Notice of Violation and pursue escalated enforcement during the next
quarter.
Ultra-Pure Metal Finishing, Inc. (Permit No. 1-021703)
Ultra-Pure Metal Finishing, Inc. (Ultra-Pure) is a metal finishing job shop. Customer-
supplied parts made of aluminum and steel are received for anodizing or chemfilm
application. Colored dyes are used on aluminum parts, while acid preclean and zinc
plating are used on steel parts. Wastewater is generated from the rinse water tanks
following the chemical process tanks. Pretreatment consists of hexavalent chrome
reduction, hydroxide precipitation, coagulant addition, and polymer/flocculation for
metals precipitation, and clarification. Solids from the clarifier are processed in a sludge
thickening tank and filter press, with filtrate returning to the beginning of the pretreatment
system.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On April 30, 2019, Ultra-Pure had a zinc violation, for which a Notice of Violation was
issued on May 13, 2019. In addition, Ultra-Pure had a zinc monthly average limit
violation in the month of April 2019. On May 24, 2019, Ultra-Pure submitted a corrective
action letter stating that the root cause of the violation was the processing of new parts
that had trapped highly concentrated solutions. The high concentration drag-out was
then carried to the rinses and caused the treatment system to be slug loaded. On June
10, 2019, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection and noted additional pretreatment
issues including slug loading of the continuous treatment system with concentrated floor
waste and inadequate record keeping of daily maintenance.
OCSD will issue a Notice of Violation for the April 2019 zinc monthly violation, as well as
4.66
a Compliance Requirements Letter to address the pretreatment issues noted above,
during the next quarter.
United Pharma, LLC (Permit No. 1-531418)
United Pharma, LLC (United Pharma) is a manufacturer of various soft gelatin
nutritional supplement capsules from customer-supplied bulk liquids. Products are
not pharmaceutically active. Wastewater is generated from the cleaning and
sterilization operations performed on mixing and dosing equipment used for gelatin
capsules. Pretreatment is limited to an underground clarifier.
In August and September 2017, United Pharma had pH violations for which Notices of
Violation were issued. In November 2017, OCSD conducted a couple of Compliance
Inspections during which the pH was again out of compliance. The matter was
discussed with United Pharma and the company indicated that manual pH adjustment
was periodically performed. OCSD advised United Pharma that this practice was not
adequate to ensure long term compliance with pH limits.
In February 2018, an Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges was issued to United
Pharma. In March 15, 2018, OCSD held a compliance meeting with United Pharma to
discuss the continued pH issues. During the meeting, United Pharma agreed to install a
continuous pH adjustment system and maintain improved attention to manually adjusting
pH in the interim. In March 2018, OCSD issued a Compliance Requirements Letter
requiring the installation of an automated treatment system by June 2018. As the
compliance date neared, United Pharma requested more time due to contractor
installation issues. Sampling performed since the meeting had been compliant.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
United Pharma installed the new treatment equipment after some delay. On August 24,
2018, OCSD conducted a follow-up inspection during which it was noted that the pH
adjustment equipment was in place and operational.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
United Pharma had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue
to monitor United Pharma's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Van Law Food Products, Inc. (Permit No. 1-531439)
Van Law Food Products, Inc. (Van Law) blends, packages, stores, and distributes
various sauces, condiments and beverage concentrates. Wastewater is generated
by the steam cleaning of packaging equipment and washdown of loading and
4.67
packaging areas, along with some boiler blowdown. Pretreatment consists of
equalization, continuous pH adjustment with caustic soda, polymer addition followed
by solids removal.
July 1 — December 31, 2018
On September 24, 2018, Van Law had a pH violation, for which a Notice of Violation
was issued on October 11, 2018. On October 23, 2018, OCSD conducted a
Compliance Inspection and resampling. The resampling result showed another pH
violation, for which a Notice of Violation was issued on October 25, 2018. On
November 5, 2018, OCSD issued a Compliance Requirement Letter requiring Van Law
to implement corrective actions and attend a compliance meeting. On November 29,
2018, OCSD held the Compliance Meeting with Van Law during which the company
reported that they had implemented the following corrective actions: rescheduling bulk
raw product deliveries to reduce spillage, additional staff training and installing a new
controller on the pretreatment system which would alert staff via email in the event of low
pH. During the meeting, Van Law also agreed to have pretreatment operators during all
hours of operation and to install a pump and piping to redirect wastewater from the
solids removal unit to the initial equalization tank in the event of low pH. On December
18, 2018, Van Law submitted a diagram of the proposed plumbing modification.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On March 11, 2019, OCSD conducted a Compliance Inspection during which OCSD
verified that the plumbing changes had been completed. Van Law had no further
violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to monitor Van Law's
discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Vit-Best Nutrition, Inc. (Permit No. 1-600010)
Vit-Best Nutrition, Inc. (Vit-Best) performs compounding of various vitamins and
nutritional supplements from food grade components. The components for the vitamins
are mixed in tanks and undergo further processing to create the final product.
Wastewater discharge consists of unit washdowns and mop-water from general cleaning
that occurs between product runs.
January 1 — June 30, 2019
On June 24, 2019, Vit-Best had a pH violation. OCSD will issue a Notice of Violation
and conduct a compliance inspection during the next quarter.
4.68
chapter 5
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STAFFING,
COSTS, AND FIELD EQUIPMENT
Introduction
Staffing, Revenues, and Costs
Field Equipment
chapter 5
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STAFFING, COSTS, AND FIELD EQUIPMENT
5.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter discusses the pretreatment program's staffing levels, program costs, payments to OCSD
by permittees, and equipment used by the program.
5.2 STAFFING, REVENUES, AND COSTS
5.2.1 Staffing
The Resource Protection Division (RPD), a part of OCSD's Environmental Services Department(ESD),
includes all the pretreatment program staff. Dedicated pretreatment staff for 2018/19 consists of 1
Manager, 3 Supervisors, 9 Engineers, 4 Environmental Specialists, 10 Field Inspectors, 3 Field
Technicians, and 7 Administrative Support Personnel for a total of 37 staff members.
5.2.2 Revenues
During FY 2018/19 a total of$17,470,646 in revenue payments were made to OCSD by Class I, Class
ll, Wastehauler, Special Purpose, and FOG permittees. The following amounts were collected for the
discharge of wastewater, Biochemical Oxygen Demand pollutants, and Suspended Solid pollutants:
Operation and Maintenance (O&M)fees totaled $9,376,178; Supplemental Capacity Facilities Capacity
Charge (SCFCC) fees totaled $6,761,632; and Wastehauler User Fees totaled $901,504. Permit fees
in the amount of$431,332 were collected,and over$117,128 in noncompliance fees and penalties were
issued. Due to a change in the OCSD's Financial Management Division's accounting practices, the
O&M and SCFCC fees represent the prior fiscal year, FY 2017/18 and an estimate of FY 2018-19
The revenue collected offsets a portion of OCSD's treatment costs and the $7,406,407 needed to
administer the pretreatment program, including labor, supplies, equipment, and other overhead. These
costs are associated with issuing permits, sampling, inspections, and laboratory analyses.
5.2.3 Program Costs
Overall pretreatment program implementation costs(including overtime)during the fiscal year increased
22.5% over the preceding year and show a 6.5% decrease from the program costs of five years ago.
The cost per labor hour over the past five years has decreased 8.5%, which is an average 1.7% per
year decrease. A comparison of pretreatment program costs for the past five years is shown in Table
5.1.
5.1
TABLE 5.1 Summary of Total Costs and Total Labor Hours for the Pretreatment Program,
Fiscal Years 2014-19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Cost Per
Fiscal Year Total Cost Labor Hours Labor Hour
2014-15 $7,923,908 71,111 $111.43
2015-16 $7,536,949 72,439 $104.05
2016-17 $6,488,868 69,046 $93.98
2017-18 $6,044,009 69,606 $86.83
2018-19 $7,406,407 72,646 $101.95
5.3 FIELD EQUIPMENT
5.3.1 Equipment Inventory
An inventory of major equipment used by the OCSD inspection staff for the Resource Protection Division
is shown in Table 6.2.Thirteen field staff, each utilizing trucks and modern sampling equipment, maintain
a high degree of visibility in the industrial community.
TABLE 5.2 Current Inventory of Major Equipment for the Pretreatment Program,
Fiscal Year 2018-19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Description Quantity
Vehicles 11
Equipment
Cellular Phones 13
Composite Samplers, General Use 43
Composite Samplers, Special Purpose 16
Portable Sample Pumps 9
pH Meters, Portable 16
Gas Meters 23
5.2
chapter 6
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STATUS
Introduction
Public Participation
Wastehauler Program
Inspection and Sampling
Quality Assurance and Quality Control Activities
Total Toxic Organics Waiver Program
Special Purpose Discharge Permit Program
Industrial Self-Monitoring Program
Industrial Operations and Maintenance Improvement Program
Significant Changes in Operating the Pretreatment Program
chapter 6
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STATUS
6.1 INTRODUCTION
The Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)administers several different program elements designed
to meet the goal of controlling discharges from industrial and non-industrial sources. These have a direct
influence on OCSD's ability to meet ocean discharge, biosolids reuse, and water reclamation
requirements. This chapter outlines those program elements designed to enforce and enhance the
federally approved Pretreatment Program, and include industrial discharger public participation,
wastehauler monitoring, industrial inspection and sampling, quality assurance/quality control, total toxic
organic(TTOs)waivers,special purpose discharge permits,self-monitoring,and industrial operations and
maintenance improvement.
6.2 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
A provision of 40 CFR 403.8 is to comply with the public participation requirements of 40 CFR Part 25 in
the enforcement of National Pretreatment Standards. These procedures shall include provision for at least
annual public notification in a newspaper(s)of general circulation that provides meaningful public notice
within the jurisdiction(s) served by OCSD, of Industrial Users which, at any time during the previous 12
months,were in significant noncompliance with applicable pretreatment requirements. This public notice
is shown in Appendix E.
6.3 WASTEHAULER PROGRAM
OCSD operates a dedicated discharge station at Reclamation Plant No. 1 for the disposal of septage,
chemical toilets, brine,cesspool and non-industrial Food Service Establishment grease(FSE)interceptor
wastes collected by independent wastehaulers. The discharges are transferred via a major interplant
sewer to Treatment Plant No. 2 for treatment. OCSD Treatment Plant No. 2 has a back-up discharge
station to be used during Plant No. 1 service interruptions. The following sections provide the status of
wastehauler permitting,discharges and monitoring conducted during FY 2018/19. Values provided in the
tables are derived primarily from manifests provided by the wastehauler companies.
6.3.1 Wastehauler Permitting
Before a liquid waste pumper can obtain a Wastehauler Permit from OCSD, the wastehauling company
must register with the Orange County Health Care Agency(OCHCA) and have all vehicles intended for
discharge at OCSD inspected by OCSD staff. Numerical decals issued by both OCHCA and OCSD are
affixed to all permitted vehicles.These decals aid in the identification of authorized dischargers. Permits
include rules for use of the wastehauler station, with enforcement for violations. Wastehaulers must
conduct their business using methods to reduce or eliminate odors. During FY 2018/19, 43 wastehauler
companies were under permit with OCSD, with a total of 128 trucks.
6.3.2 Wastehauler Discharges
During the past fiscal year, 13.2 million gallons(MG)of waste was discharged by permitted wastehaulers
at the OCSD Wastehauler Station. The volume of waste accepted at the station was 8.3%higher than the
volume received during FY 2017/18. The number of loads received increased by40.4%from FY2017/18.
As of January 18, 2016, OCSD started using a new pretreatment software and database(iPACS),which
6.1
allows for more accurate tracking and calculation of discharged volumes. The reported volume for FY
2015/16 through FY 2018/19 takes into account the self-reported volumes, instead of the maximum
capacity volumes reported in previous years, which assumed all received tanks were full. Wastehauler
discharge data for the last five years is summarized in Table 6.1.
TABLE 6.1 Summary of Wastehauler Loads and Volume Discharged into Plant No. 1
Disposal Station, Fiscal Years 2014-2019
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Loads Volume Waste Received
Fiscal Year Delivered Millions of Gallons
2014-15 6,972 14.8
2015-16 7,472 14.2'
2016-17 8,465 18.11
2017-18 4,844 12.11
2018-19 8,127 13.2'
Volume reported is based on Wastehauler self-reported volumes.
Wastehauler loads are classified into five types of waste: Brine, cesspool,chemical toilets, non-industrial
Food Service Establishment(FSE)grease interceptor waste(i.e.restaurant grease trap waste),and septic
tanks. The total volumes and number of loads for each type of waste are summarized in Table 6.2.
TABLE 6.2 Summary of Wastehauler Load Types Discharged into Plant No. 1
Disposal Station, Fiscal Year 2018/19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Loads Waste Received in Percent of
Load Type Delivered Millions of Gallons Waste Received
Brine 18 <0.1 <1
Cesspool 104 0.2 1.2
Chemical Toilet 3,936 5.8 44.2
Food Service Establishment 2,939 5.4 41
(FSE) Grease
Septic Tank 1,116 1.7 13.1
Other 14 <0.1 <1
Total All Types 8,127 13.2 100
During the past fiscal year, 5.4 million gallons of FSE grease was discharged by permitted wastehaulers at
OCSD's Wastehauler Station. This represents a 6.9% decrease from the volume of grease discharged
during FY 2017/18. The five-year trend for grease is presented in Table 6.3.
6.2
TABLE 6.3 Summary of Wastehauler Grease Wastewater Loads into OCSD's Disposal
Station, Fiscal Years 2014-2019
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year Loads Delivered Millions of Gallons
2014-15 2,584 7.9
2015-16 2,565 7.21
2016-17 3,668 9.33
2017-18 3,100 5.8
2018-19 2,939 5.4
6.3.3 Wastehauler Monitoring
Random sampling of wastehauler loads is conducted to verify compliance with OCSD discharge limits.
During FY 2018/19, the contents of 667 wastehauler vehicles(8.2%of all loads received)were sampled
and 4,002 metal analyses were performed.The results of the sampling included 33 metal violations in 23
loads that originated from either domestic sources or grease hauling. This represents a 3.4% violation
rate of the total samples taken and analyzed. The violations included nineteen copper, and sixteen zinc
concentration exceedances. Some of the actions taken by OCSD as a response to these violations
included generator verifications and inspections,investigations,Notice of Violation letters,and compliance
meetings.
6.4 INSPECTION AND SAMPLING
OCSD schedules sampling and inspection of each Class I industry quarterly, and samples select Class II
industries periodically. Permittees are sampled for metals, cyanide, organics, pH, oil and grease,
biochemical oxygen demand(BOD),and suspended solids(SS). Inspections are conducted before and/or
after each 24-hour composite sampling event, at the time of collecting a grab sample, and to determine
compliance with other provisions of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance).
6.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL ACTIVITIES
6.5.1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) Program Tasks
The objective of the QA/QC program is to ensure that all field sampling and monitoring is accurate and
performed in accordance with Resource Protection Division's adopted policies and procedures. The
QA/QC program includes the following components:
Equipment Blank — Composite samples of deionized water are collected monthly to evaluate the
cleaning procedures and storage of automatic sampling equipment.
Archive Sample Check—Archived heavy metal samples are analyzed monthly, several months after
collection,to evaluate the effects of sample storage conditions and whether those conditions impose
analyte degradation or contamination.
6.3
Sample Collection Check — Duplicate composite samples are collected quarterly to evaluate the
precision of the sample collection and preservation methods.
Trip Blank Evaluation —Samples made up of reagent water are collected to measure the potential
contamination of EPA Method 624 samples during transport and storage.
Sample Collection and Inspection Audit — Periodic reviews are conducted to assure that the
Inspectors conform to existing guidelines for inspection and sample collection, and that existing
procedures continue to ensure representative data. Document reviews are completed to assess
Inspector overall performance.
During FY 2018/19, 72 composite samples were collected for equipment blank verification, 48 archived
samples were analyzed for comparison against previous analytical results, 0 composite samples were
collected from industrial discharges to audit collection methods, and 12 trip blank samples were analyzed
to verify the effectiveness of the transportation and storage methods of volatile organic compound
samples. The test results for QA/QC samples collected are detailed in Appendix I. The overall results
show that the procedures and their implementation for the collection of field samples are adequate to
assure sample quality and consistency.
Calculation Methods
Equipment blank sampling is performed to find any concentration above the reporting limit (RL). Any
detectable amount is considered an indicator of possible contamination in the deionized water supply,
detergent,containers,storage,or other sources.The number of times a metal is detected above the RL is
tracked.
Methods for calculating deviations were refined beginning with data generated during 2005 to be more
consistent with accepted laboratory standards for quality control.The prior use of Pretreatment Standards
for Existing Sources (PSES) discharge limits to calculate percent deviations for duplicate samples has
been replaced with the relative percent difference (RPD) formula found in Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater(hereafter Standard Methods), 22"d Edition, Part 1020 B, Section
12, Subsection f, entitled "Duplicate sample" (pg. 1-11).
Precision among duplicate samples is important for the archive samples and sample collection checks.
The following metrics were determined based on the nature of the samples normally collected and the
variables with matrix effects anticipated. The precision of low-level duplicates, with concentrations less
than 20 times the RL is ± 25% RPD. The precision of high-level duplicates, with concentrations greater
than 20 times the RL, is ± 20% RPD. These guidelines are used to present and calculate the archive
sample data in the tables below. If the average of the two duplicate samples is greater than 20 times the
RL, then the more restrictive limit of 20% is used to evaluate precision. Additionally, per Standard
Methods,22"d Edition, Part 1020B, Section 8,values where the average is below five(5)times the RL are
not used for RPD calculation.
A study conducted in 2009, including a review of relevant literature and OCSD data, has confirmed that
silver is relatively unstable under standard preservation and storage conditions, and cannot be used to
evaluate precision and accuracy with the other metals listed below in archive samples. Consequently,
silver has been removed from the list of metals used to evaluate precision and accuracy.
The current reporting limits(RLs)used by OCSD's laboratory during FY 2018/19 are listed below. These
reporting limits are used in calculations in tables where RLs appear.
6.4
Cadmium Chromium Copper Nickel Lead Zinc
RL(mg/L) 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
6.5.2 QA/QC Sampling Results
Evaluation of Equipment Blank Sampling Results
To check for contamination of sampler and field equipment, two composite samples are collected each
quarter using clean, randomly chosen automatic samplers. The two samplers are set at the Source
Control Inspection Group's technician room to collect composite samples from a deionized water supply
placed in the sampler's 24 bottles. The QA/QC samples are composited and preserved in the same
manner as compliance samples collected at permitted facilities. Each composite is split into three equal
volumes, preserved, submitted to, and analyzed individually by OCSD's laboratory for heavy metal
constituents.
The results of this study are summarized in Table 6.4.The statistics presented below show that 93.75%of
the analyses (405 of the 432 analyses) are at or below the heavy metal constituents RL.
TABLE 6.4 Equipment Blank Sampling Results, Fiscal Year 2018119
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Analyses at or Below Analyses Above
Reporting Limit Reporting Limits Total Avg.
Constituent RL(mg/L) No. of Analyses Percentage No. of Analyses Deviation
Cadmium 0.1 72 100 0 0.000
Chromium 0.02 72 100 0 0.000
Copper 0.02 72 100 0 0.000
Nickel 0.02 72 100 0 0.000
Lead 0.02 72 100 0 0.000
Zinc 0.02 45 62.5 27 0.020
Summaries 405 93.75 27 0.010
27 of the Zinc samples had results above the RL. Of the results above the RL, all were just slightly above
the RL. Zinc is common a contaminant and present in dust; OCSD continues to review equipment
maintenance and storage procedures to try to minimize this low concentration contamination.
Evaluation of Archived Samples
Archived samples are submitted to OCSD's laboratory to evaluate the effects of sample splitting and
storage techniques. The results of the archive sample analyses are compared with the original sample
results and the relative percent difference(RPD)is calculated for each metal. Results at or below the RL
are calculated as equal to the RL.
6.5
Statistics on the archived samples and relative percent differences(RPD)are summarized in Table 6.5.Of
the 288 comparisons performed on 96 samples(48 archived samples and 48 original samples), 97.9%of
the results were within the acceptable RPD.
TABLE 6.5 QA/QC Evaluation of Archived Samples, Fiscal Year 2018/19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Comparisons Comparisons Percent
within outside within Average
Constituent Acceptable RPD Acceptable RPD Acceptable RPD RPD(%)
Cadmium 48 0 100 0
Chromium 46 2 95.8 17.6
Copper 47 1 98 18.4
Nickel 47 1 98 7.3
Lead 47 1 98 3.6
Zinc 47 1 98 11.9
Summaries 282 6 97.9 9.8
The incidents of comparisons outside acceptable RPDs are believed to originate from sample splitting
and/or preservation errors.
A review of archive sample handling procedures took place during FY 2016/17, and a new procedure for
storing sample archives was implemented on July 1, 2016. OCSD's Laboratory is planning to perform
analysis to study sample preservation and potential degradation or leaching.
Sample Collection Checks
Two composite samples are collected each quarter to verify the precision of the sample collection
methods. In this study, two automatic samplers are installed adjacent to each other at a single industrial
sample point to collect one composite sample from each sampler. Each composite sample is split into ten
duplicate portions. Five duplicates from each sampler are analyzed by OCSD's laboratory for heavy
metals and five are analyzed for total suspended solids (TSS).
The results for each constituent are evaluated by calculating the relative percent difference(RPD)for each
group of metals. Values that exceed the accepted deviations for metals and TSS are investigated, and
where causes are identified, corrective actions are taken. This comparison is used to confirm that the
sample location is appropriate, that the samplers are maintained and are functioning properly, and that
sample-splitting techniques are effective.
The statistics on the collection check samples and the sampler average deviations are summarized in
Table 6.6. The comparisons show acceptable agreement both among the samples within the sampler and
between samplers at the same site.
6.6
TABLE 6.6 QA/QC Collection Check Samples and Sampler Average Deviations, Fiscal Year
2018/19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
FQtr- Average Deviations
. Location Cadmium Chromium Copper Nickel Lead Zinc TSS
1 Sampler A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.2
Sampler B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.8
Site RPD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.1 18.3
2 Sampler A 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.24 0.00 0.00 1.4
Sampler B 0.00 14.9 12.2 42.6 0.00 0.00 0.9
Site RPD 0.00 0.00 0.00 90.7 0.00 0.00 23
3 Sampler A 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.0
Sampler B 0.00 0.25 0.20 0.67 0.00 .30 0.0
Site RPD 0.00 14.8 17.3 15.2 0.00 0.00 0.0
4 Sampler A 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 4
Sampler B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 5.1
Site RPD 0.00 13.81 29.65 2.65 0.00 0.00 9.1
Avg. Site RPD 0.00 6.97 11.73 27.14 0.00 3.02 12.6
All results are in units of sampler average deviation. TSS =total suspended solids
The variances between samples at the same site were mostly low however,there was a large difference in
the second quarter for Chromium, Copper, Nickel, and TSS. It is unknown what caused the large
difference but it seems there may be a possible data transposition. Collection check procedures are
currently being evaluated and staff will be notified of any changes if necessary.
Trip Blank Evaluation for EPA Method 624 Analysis
Inspectors perform this study monthly. Containers prepared with reagent water are obtained from OCSD's
laboratory and carried by inspectors with other samples during their workday.The containers are returned
to the lab and analyzed for volatile organics. Eleven trip blanks were analyzed for volatile organics using
EPA Method 624 with one month not collected due to scheduling errors.
Sample Collection and Inspection Audit
During FY 2018/19,the source control supervisor audited the sample collection and inspection procedures
of individual inspectors. The audit of each inspector was accomplished by document review during
performance evaluations. Opportunities for improvement were discussed with individual inspectors during
their mid-year and annual performance reviews.
6.5.3 Conclusions
The following findings supportthe general conclusion thatthe sampling procedures are being followed and
that the samples are representative and free of contamination:
• Results of the Equipment Blank Evaluation demonstrate that 93.75% of the equipment blank
samples have concentrations at or below the heavy metal reporting limits. The remaining 6.25%
contained low level Zinc contamination slightly above the RL.
6.7
• Results of the Archive Sample Evaluation demonstrate that 97.9% of the archive samples were
within the acceptable percent deviation range.
• The Sample Collection Check results show good agreement for heavy metals among split
samples for each sampler as well as between samplers at the same site. The sample locations
and sample-splitting methods are adequate to provide representative samples for heavy metals.
• Eleven of twelve EPA Method 624 trip blanks were below reporting limits. Eleven trip blanks were
analyzed for volatile organics using EPA Method 624 with one month not collected due to
scheduling errors.
• The Sample Collection and Inspection Audit involved a broad review of inspection and sampling
records. The results of the audits were discussed with individual inspectors during their
performance reviews.
6.6 TOTAL TOXIC ORGANICS WAIVER PROGRAM
Permittees subject to Federal Categorical Standards were first notified of OCSD's Total Toxic Organics
(TTOs) Control Program requirements on July 27, 1987. The current TTOs Program is summarized
below:
• Categorical permittees who are required to conduct self-monitoring for Total Toxic Organics
(TTOs) must collect composite samples at least twice a year. In accordance with OCSD's
Wastewater Discharge Regulations,the composite sample typically consists of a minimum of four
(4) grab samples where the concentration of a composite sample is obtained by analyzing the
grab samples and compositing the results mathematically.
• Permittees who have not shown detectable levels of TTOs based on their wastewater discharge
data for at least one year are eligible to waive the self-monitoring requirement if they can certify
that TTOs are not used or present in the industrial wastewater discharge at their facility. The
wastewater discharge data used in evaluating eligibility for this waiver includes data for samples
obtained by OCSD during routine monitoring and the self-monitoring results obtained by the
permittee. The evaluation of wastewater discharge to determine the permittees that are eligible
for this waiver is conducted in December and June of each year. See Table 6.7 for those
permittees that have successfully applied for a waiver. To be eligible for a waiver, the permittee
must satisfy all of the following:
• Permittee must demonstrate sampling results with TTO concentrations less than or equal
to 0.05 mg/L for the monitoring period being considered.
• Permit must have an initial permit issue date that is prior to the start of the baseline
monitoring being considered.
• Submission of an acceptable Toxic Organic Management Plan (TOMP).
• Subsequently, permittees who have a TTOs self-monitoring waiver renew their Certification of
Non-Use of TTOs semi-annually during this period; otherwise,the waiver is cancelled. Issuance
of a waiver does not constitute elimination of the self-monitoring requirement from the permit but
merely a temporary discontinuance or suspension of the requirement.
• The self-monitoring requirement waiver for any permittee is cancelled if sampling results from the
permittee's self-monitoring or OCSD's sampling demonstrate TTO concentrations above the 0.05
6.8
mg/L threshold. For these cases,the requirement to conduct self-monitoring at least twice a year
is immediately reinstated.
• Newly permitted categorical users required to self-monitor will not be allowed to waive the self-
monitoring requirement until meeting TTO reporting and waiver requirements for at least a year.
Table 6.7 Permittees with TTOs Waivers,July 1, 2018-June 30, 2019
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) Resource Protection Division (RPD)
Permit No. Facility Name Federal Categories
1-531422 A&G Electropolish Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021088 A& R Powder Coating, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011138 Accurate Circuit Engineering Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011115 Active Plating, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021389 Advance Tech Plating, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-531404 Air Industries,A PCC Company(Knott) Metal Finishing PSES
1-011073 Allied Electronics Services, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011036 Alloy Tech Electropolishing, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021249 American Circuit Technology, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521798 Andres Technical Plating Metal Finishing PSNS
1-600295 AnoChem Coatings Metal Finishing PSNS
1-511389 Anodyne, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011155 Anomil Ent. Dba Danco Metal Surfacing Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021192 ARO Service Metal Finishing PSNS
1-571295 Astech Engineered Products, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-071037 Aviation Equipment Processing Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521824 Beckman Coulter, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-511370 Beo-Mag Plating Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021213 Black Oxide Industries, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-111018 Boeing Company (Graham) Metal Finishing PSNS
1-511368 Brasstech, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
Metal Finishing PSES& PSNS and
1-021226 Bristol Industries Nonferrous Metals Forming and
Metal Powders PSNS
1-521770 Burlington Engineering, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021062 Cadillac Plating, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-511076 CD Video, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-511414 Chromadora, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521821 Circuit Technology, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-111129 Coast to Coast Circuits, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-531436 Coastline Metal Finishing Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021290 Continuous Coating Corporation Coil Coating PSNS and Metal
Finishing PSNS
1-021289 Crest Coating, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
6.9
Table 6.7 Permittees with TTOs Waivers,July 1, 2018-June 30, 2019
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) Resource Protection Division (RPD)
Permit No. Facility Name Federal Categories
1-021297 Custom Enamelers, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021379 Data Aire, Inc.#2 Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011142 Data Electronic Services, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521761 Data Solder, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021325 Dunham Metal Processing Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011064 EFT Fast Quality Service, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021158 Electro Metal Finishing Corporation Metal Finishing PSNS
1-071162 Electrolurgy, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021336 Electron Plating III, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021337 Electronic Precision Specialties, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521855 Excello Circuits Manufacturing Corp. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011068 Fabrication Concepts Corporation Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021121 Fineline Circuits&Technology, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021352 Gomtech Electronics, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021286 Harbor Truck Bodies, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521790 Hi Tech Solder Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021185 Hightower Plating& Manufacturing Co. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-061115 Hixson Metal Finishing Electroplating PSES
1-021041 Ideal Anodizing, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521756 Ikon Powder Coating, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-031106 Imperial Plating Metal Finishing PSNS
1-600243 Integral Aerospace, LLC Metal Finishing PSNS
1-571328 Irvine Sensors Corporation Electrical and Electronic
Components PSNS
1-571292 Jazz Semiconductor Electrical and Electronic
Components PSNS
1-511407 JD Processing, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021428 Kryler Corporation Electroplating PSES and Metal
Finishing PSNS
1-600338 Lightning Diversion Systems LLC Metal Finishing PSNS
1-511361 LM Chrome Corporation Metal Finishing PSNS
1-031049 Logi Graphics, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-111007 M.S. Bellows Metal Finishing PSNS
1-531391 Magnetic Metals Corporation Metal Finishing PSNS
1-600006 Meggitt, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021153 Micrometals, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521811 Murrietta Circuits Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521772 Neutronic Stamping and Plating Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521801 Nobel Biocare USA, LLC Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021520 Omni Metal Finishing, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
6.10
Table 6.7 Permittees with TTOs Waivers,July 1, 2018-June 30, 2019
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) Resource Protection Division (RPD)
Permit No. Facility Name Federal Categories
1-021070 Pacific Image Technology, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-141002 Parker Hannifin Corporation Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521783 Patio and Door Outlet, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521805 Performance Powder, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011262 Pioneer Circuits, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521852 Platinum Surface Coating, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-600167 PowderCoat Services, LLC- Building E Metal Finishing PSNS
1-600168 PowderCoat Services, LLC- Building J Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521809 Precision Anodizing& Plating, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011008 Precision Circuits West, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-061138 Railmakers, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011013 RBC Transport Dynamics Corp. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-511376 Reid Metal Finishing Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021187 Rigiflex Technology, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021033 Roto-Die Company, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-061008 Sanmina Corporation (Airway) Metal Finishing PSNS
1-061009 Sanmina Corporation (Redhill) Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021016 Santana Services Metal Finishing PSNS
1-031311 Scientific Spray Finishes, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-600297 Shur-Lok Company Metal Finishing PSNS
1-031341 Soldermask, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011069 South Coast Circuits, Inc. (Bldg 3500 A) Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011030 South Coast Circuits, Inc. (Bldg 3506 A) Metal Finishing PSNS
1-511365 South Coast Circuits, Inc. (Bldg 3512 A) Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011054 South Coast Circuits, Inc. (Bldg 3524 A) Metal Finishing PSNS
Metal Finishing PSNS and
1-011310 SPS Technologies Nonferrous Metals Forming and
Metal Powders PSES
1-021672 Stainless Micro-Polish, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-531425 Star Powder Coating, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021664 Statek Corporation (Main) Electrical and Electronic
Components PSES
1-521777 Statek Corporation (Orange Grove) Electrical and Electronic
Components PSNS
1-600012 Summit Interconnect, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-600060 Summit Interconnect, Inc., Orange Division Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021090 Superior Plating Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021403 Superior Processing Metal Finishing PSNS
1-031012 Tayco Engineering, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021123 Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company Metal Finishing PSNS
1-571309 TC Cosmotronic, Inc., DBA Cosmotronic Metal Finishing PSNS
6.11
Table 6.7 Permittees with TTOs Waivers,July 1, 2018-June 30, 2019
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) Resource Protection Division (RPD)
Permit No. Facility Name Federal Categories
1-021082 Techplate, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021282 Thermal-Vac Technology, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-111132 Tiodize Company, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021202 Transline Technology, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-141163 Tropitone Furniture Co., Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521859 TTM Technologies North America, LLC. Metal Finishing PSNS
(Coronado)
1-511366 TTM Technologies North America, LLC. Metal Finishing PSNS
(Croddy)
1-511359 TTM Technologies North America, LLC. Metal Finishing PSNS
(Harbor)
1-021703 Ultra-Pure Metal Finishing, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521836 Universal Molding Co. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-031035 Winonics (Brea) Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021735 Winonics, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
6.7 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMIT PROGRAM
A Special Purpose Discharge Permit(SPDP)is issued by OCSD for water and wastewater discharges to
the sewerage system when no alternative discharge point exists other than the sewer system and/or
considered alternate discharge methods pose an environmental impact or threat.
Wastewater discharges may include: 1)temporary facilities and projects such as groundwater cleanup and
construction dewatering; 2) short-term or one-time water and wastewater discharges; 3) emergency
discharges from facilities that have no other industrial or permitted discharge point; or 4) surface run-off
from areas associated with an industrial or commercial facility.
6.7.1 Metrics and Trends
During FY 2018/19, there were fourteen new SPDPs issued, of which 7 were later voided, another 9
existing SPDPs were voided, and three SPDPs that were not renewed by the permittee. During the
fiscal year, there were 66 active SPDPs, an increase from the previous fiscal year. Active SPDPs are
renewed on a biannual basis.
The majority of the new SPDPs issued during FY 2018/19 were for short-term construction dewatering
activities(i.e.,typically less than a year). Formerly,the most common special purpose permitted facilities
were gasoline service stations that required remediation of contaminated groundwater. Other dischargers
affected include mobile cleaners,water features(e.g. pools),water-well purging disinfection, subsurface
parking structure dewatering, etc.
OCSD staff continues to work with outside agencies such as the RWQCB-SAR8, OCHCA, and the cities
within Orange County to both coordinate and offer guidance on the SPDP issuance process and OCSD's
Wastewater Discharge Regulations(Ordinance).
6.12
6.7.2 SPDP Program Enforcement
For FY 2018/19, the Irvine Company Apartment Communities (ICAC) had a copper violation on
November 26, 2018. A Notice of Violation with resampling requirement was issued to ICAC on
January 16, 2019. The resampling showed compliance. It has previously been determined that the
source of the violation was the mobile car washing activities in the parking structure. Upon receipt of
the Notice of Violation, ICAC prohibited further car washing activities onsite. Should another violation
occur, OCSD will pursue escalated enforcement action.
6.7.3 SPDP Regulatory Program
OCSD staff minimizes SPDP impacts to OCSD Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2.
by diverting non-compatible discharges from Reclamation Plant 1 to Treatment Plant 2; coordinating
more closely with Operations, Engineering and Safety on significant one-time discharges; requiring
pretreatment for projects which may encounter known contaminated underground plumes; requiring
best management practices for small nuisance dischargers; and requiring significant construction
dewatering dischargers to stop discharging during a rain/storm event.
6.8 SELF-MONITORING PROGRAM
OCSD operates an extensive self-monitoring program,which is an integral part of the Resource Protection
Division's monitoring and enforcement programs. OCSD's self-monitoring program exceeds the minimum
requirements of 40 CFR 403. To obtain a broad perspective of a permittee's discharge quality and
adequately determine their compliance status, OCSD takes a proactive approach to self-monitoring (per
EPA recommendation) by requiring frequent sampling in most cases. OCSD determined that sampling
quarterly or semi-annually is an effective method to generate sufficient data to make a fair determination of
a permittee's compliance status; and balance the need for data against the related costs incurred by
permittees. In addition,these sampling frequencies preclude permittees from being unduly classified as
SNC for isolated process upsets.
OCSD's self-monitoring program is largely automated with self-monitoring results submitted on OCSD's
standardized Self-Monitoring Report (SMR) forms. These forms are computer-generated with unique
SMR numbers that allow tracking and automatic generation of reminders, late and incomplete notices,
violation notices with resample forms, and SNC notices. This tracking system has enabled OCSD to
ensure that permittees comply with self-monitoring requirements.
In January 2016,OCSD launched its new permitting, inspection,and monitoring software,which includes
an automated online self-monitoring entry program component called GovOnline. However,GovOnline is
currently not functional and OCSD has been working with the vendor to fix the technical issues.
6.9 INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
To remain a vital part of the community, help businesses and industries in OCSD's service area maintain
compliance, and to enable OCSD to attain its environmental goals, OCSD established an Industrial
Operations and Maintenance Improvement Program. The program serves as both a resource for industry
and a forum for discussing methods to carry out environmental requirements. The program consists of
outreach and education,which includes publications addressing pretreatment program elements such as
permitting,compliance and pollution prevention;OCSD staff presence at educational events and fairs;and
OCSD-sponsored training opportunities.
6.13
Industrial Operations and Maintenance Improvement Program
The ongoing trend in industrial permittee discharge violations have shown that most cases are due to
inadequate operations and maintenance of industry's pretreatment systems as well as industrial operator
error. This was recognized years ago, when the U.S. EPA audit findings of 1998 recommended that
OCSD develop and implement an industrial operations and improvement program. In 1999/2000,OCSD
developed a plan that included outreach and operator training, and enforcement of requirements for
operator and operations and maintenance practices which is still in effect today.
In 2018, OCSD conducted an advanced training course for industrial wastewater treatment(pretreatment)
operators currently employed by facilities holding a Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit. The course
was conducted by an engineering services company(selected via bid process for a five-year contract in
2014). OCSD provided this training, free of charge, to assist permittees to obtain and retain a qualified
pretreatment operator and to reduce or eliminate noncompliance due to operation and maintenance and/or
operator problems. The training course consisted of two 4.5-hour classes and a follow-up wastewater
audit at the operator facility to ensure proper implementation of operation and maintenance practices.
Those class participants that attended both classes, passed the exam and quizzes, and successfully
fulfilled the audit requirements, will receive Certificates of Completion.
As 2018 was the last year of the five-year contract, OCSD underwent the process of issuing a request for
proposals to initiate a new contract for 2019,with an option to renew each year until 2024 (5 years total).
OCSD will award the new 2019-2024 contract during the next reporting period.
6.10 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN OPERATING THE PRETREATMENT PROGRAM
There were no significant changes to the OCSD Pretreatment Program during FY 2018/19.
6.14
chapter 7
INTERACTION WITH OTHER AGENCIES
Introduction
Los Angeles Sanitation District Nos. 18 and 19 Flow Accommodation
Agreement
Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD)
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA)
Chapter 7
INTERACTION WITH OTHER AGENCIES
7.1 INTRODUCTION
The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) has entered into agreements and has developed
Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) with Los Angeles County Sanitation District (LACSD) Nos. 18
and 19, Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD), and the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA)for
accepting their wastewater flows and implementing source control discharge, inspection, and enforcement
requirements. Therefore, this chapter is divided into three sections below, the first section presents
information on LACSD for FY 2018/19, the second section presents information on IRWD for FY 2018/19,
and the third on SAWPA for FY 2018/19.
7.2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 18 AND 19 FLOW
ACCOMMODATION AGREEMENT
In 1960, Los Angeles County Sanitation District Nos. 18 and 19 (LACSD) and County Sanitation District
No. 3 of Orange County, predecessor to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), entered into a flow
accommodation agreement by which each District agreed to receive wastewater from the other District,
where the wastewater originated in one District's service area and discharged into the other District's
sewerage system. The geographic areas subject to the agreement are located along the Los Angeles
County/Orange County boundary and are characterized by the fact that they are physically isolated from
the sewer system of their respective District's jurisdiction by Coyote Creek. The Districts entered into
subsequent flow accommodation agreements for the 2010-11 and 2011-12 fiscal years. A current
agreement was approved by the Board of Directors of both LACSD and OCSD on July 1, 2012.
The flow accommodation agreement is fee-based, focusing primarily on residential parcels and flows. For
the few industrial dischargers, the fees are based on flow, biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen
demand and suspended solids. The originating District is responsible for administering and enforcing its
industrial waste Pretreatment Program for industries in its service area, with terms and conditions of
coordination and information exchange between the Districts.
For this fiscal year, OCSD has no industrial facilities discharging to LACSD. LACSD has four (4) non-
categorical permittees discharging to OCSD:
• Chemetall Oakite Corp.
• Coyle Reproductions, Inc.
• RockTenn CP, LLC
• T. Hasegawa USA Inc.
Permit and sample information for the above companies has been submitted to OCSD.
7.3 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT (IRWD)
IRWD is a California Water District in central Orange County, California, which is served by several
Revenue Zones within the jurisdiction of OCSD and other agencies. The northern and coastal parts of
IRWD are served by OCSD. The pretreatment program in these sections is managed by OCSD. A small
portion of the eastern part of IRWD, called Portola Hills, is currently sewered to Santa Margarita Water
District, a member of the South Orange County Wastewater Authority (SOCWA). SOCWA administers the
pretreatment program for its member agencies.
On January 1, 2001, the Los Alisos Water District (LAWD) consolidated with IRWD. LAWD owned and
operated a 5.5-million-gallon-per-day (MGD) water recycling plant whose tertiary effluent is used under
7.1
permits granted by both Region 8 and Region 9 Water Quality Control Boards. Secondary wastewater
effluent up to 7.5 MGD that is not recycled is discharged to the Aliso Creek Ocean Outfall in Laguna Beach.
IRWD also uses its capacity in the Aliso Creek Ocean Outfall to dispose of brine from the Irvine Desalter
and treated groundwater from its Shallow Groundwater Unit facility. SOCWA administers the pretreatment
program for discharges to the ocean outfall.
Most of IRWD is in Orange County Sanitation Revenue Zone No. 14, which collects sewage for treatment
at either IRWD's Michelson Water Recycling Plant(MWRP)or OCSD's Reclamation Plant No. 1. Currently,
most of the sewage generated within Revenue Zone No. 14 is treated at MWRP, which is a tertiary
treatment plant with a design capacity of 28 MGD. MWRP's highly treated effluent meets all of the State of
California Title 22 regulations for the reuse of recycled water. Sludge from MWRP is pumped to an OCSD
sewer for treatment and disposal.
7.3.1 IRWD Operating Permit, Regional Board Order 2015-0024
On June 19, 2015, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board adopted Order No. R8-2015-0024,
superseding Order No. R8-2007-0003. Monitoring and Reporting Program under Order No. R8-2015-0024
requires an annual full priority pollutant scan,with quarterly samples analyzed for those pollutants that were
detected in the annual scan. Sludge monitoring is not one of the requirements of the Order.
IRWD organic priority pollutant analyses for influent, effluent, and sludge are provided following the
narrative. IRWD has scheduled priority pollutant monitoring more frequently than required by permit in
order to provide additional information to OCSD on the quality of wastewater and sludge in Revenue Zone
14. IRWD will continue to monitor the influent, effluent, and sludge quarterly.
On September 7, 2018, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board adopted Order No. R8-2018-
0070, amending Order No. R8-2015-0024, allowing for discharges to San Diego Creek under emergency
conditions. IRWD is currently undergoing the process for permit renewal.
7.3.2 IRWD Analytical Reporting
Annually, the discharger shall submit...a summary of analytical results from representative, flow
proportioned, 24-hour composite sampling of the POTW's influent and effluent for those pollutants EPA has
identified under Section 307(a) of the Act.
The collection points for the influent, effluent and sludge samples are as follows:
Influent: Collected at headworks after grit basins.
Effluent: Collected at the end of the chlorine contact basin (CCB), but downstream of where
the CCB effluent and ultraviolet (UV) disinfected effluent are combined, just prior
to entering the recycled water distribution system.
Sludge: Collected at the flow meter vault on the MPS-3 force main prior to ferrous chloride
injection.
The sampling of influent, effluent, and sludge is performed by Regulatory Compliance personnel according
to the following protocol:
1. Grab samples are collected quarterly for influent, effluent, and sludge samples and analyzed for
volatile organic priority pollutants.
2. Composite samples are collected for BNA extractables, inorganic priority pollutants,
pesticides/PCBs, and phenols at each location. This sampling is performed with a Sigma sampler
that collects discrete samples at hourly intervals over a twenty-four-hour period. The discrete
samples are composited according to flow, and aliquots are distributed into the appropriate sample
7.2
container. All the samples are collected in glass bottles and distributed into the appropriate glass
or plastic bottle.
Some samples are refrigerated and shipped on ice to Weck Laboratories in City of Industry,
California for analysis. Weck Labs supplies all containers with the proper preservatives.
The detection limits may vary from quarter to quarter due to matrix interference and sensitivity of
the analytical equipment; however, the results for each quarter are valid for the detection limit
reported. IRWD and its contract laboratories have endeavored to meet or exceed reporting levels
established in permits.
7.3.3 Inorganic Pollutants
General Minerals
Because IRWD is a water recycling agency, MWRP effluent is subject to general mineral requirements to
protect Basin Plan water quality criteria. IRWD utilizes local groundwater and imported water to supply its
customer domestic water needs,and the quality of the recycled water is based on the quality of the domestic
supply. The current Basin Plan standard for the Irvine Groundwater Basin is 910 mg/L Total Dissolved
Solids (TDS), and the current TDS limit for discharges to recycled water reservoirs designated as "Waters
of the State" is 720 mg/L. As a purveyor
of recycled water, the IRWD goal is to 800 - - -
provide high quality water regardless of J 780 - - -
standards applied in the basin and has "' 760
implemented several projects which 740 - -
improve the quality of the domestic v
water supply, which results in � 720 -
improvement in the quality of recycled Q 700 -
water. In 1991, IRWD prepared the 3 680
Michelson Influent Wastewater Quality c 660
Improvement Plan which identifies g
procedures to be followed to produce the In,, 640
highest quality recycled water. An ~ 620
important feature of the plan was to 600 � N M a � o N rn � � r, oo
maximize the delivery of high quality q q q q q q q q q `" `" `" `" `"
5
domestic water during the period of Figure 7.1 MWRP Effluent Total Dissolved Solids(Annual Average)
greatest recycled water consumption. In Irvine Ranch Water District—Michelson Water Recycling Plant
April 2002, IRWD commissioned Its Orange County Sanitation District
Deep Aquifer Treatment System plant,
an 8-MGD membrane filtration plant, to provide additional high quality domestic water for its customers.
The treatment plant removes natural organic matter in the form of color from a low TDS (250 mg/I on
average) deep groundwater source. In January 2007, IRWD commissioned the Irvine Desalter Project-
Potable Treatment Plant (PTP), a 5.5-MGD reverse osmosis plant and in March 2013 commissioned the
Wells 21/22 Desalter Plant, a 6.3-MGD reverse osmosis plant, to provide high quality domestic water for its
customers. Both desalter plants remove minerals from water in the Irvine Groundwater Basin to provide a
target of 420 mg/L TDS in the final product water. All three treatment plants are designed to operate
continuously, thereby decreasing consumption of high TDS imported water, and improving mineral quality
of the MWRP effluent. IRWD still needs to import some higher TDS water to meet its water supply needs.
The minerals rejected by the reverse osmosis system for the PTP are discharged into the ocean through
the Aliso Creek Ocean Outfall, and for the Wells 21/22 Desalter Plant are discharged to the sewer that goes
to OCSD's Reclamation Plant No. 1. For FY18/19, PTP operation has resulted in a net export of salt from
the Irvine Groundwater Basin of approximately 2,177 tons. For FY18/19, the Wells 21/22 Desalter has
resulted in a net export of salt from the Irvine Groundwater Basin of approximately 1,596 tons.
Additionally, IRWD has completed a Salt Management Plan that identifies management strategies, cost
estimates for implementing recommended actions and provide recommendations for policies that may be
7.3
considered to manage recycled water salt concentrations throughout the District. Those policies addressed
both current and future conditions that take into consideration changing source water conditions during
ongoing drought as well as water conservation practices that can all impact the TDS concentrations of the
sewage treated at MWRP.
The seasonal change in MWRP effluent mineral quality, on a fiscal year annual average, is also shown in
Figure 7.1. The recycled water mineral quality, as expressed by total dissolved solids (TDS), varied by 110
mg/I during 2018/2019. The effect of providing higher quality domestic water can be seen in the gradual
reduction in TDS of the recycled water over the last five years. The slight increase that occurred last fiscal
year (2015/2016) could have been due to impacts from ongoing water conservation efforts and increased
TDS concentrations from imported water supplies.
Total Heavy Metals
IRWD has been analyzing the heavy metals on the list of inorganic priority pollutants for the last 36 years
at MWRP. During the 36-year period, the total mass of heavy metals has increased from 5 pounds per day
(Ibs/day) to the current 40.46 Ibs/day in the influent, a 7.3% increase over the previous year, and has
increased in the effluent from 2.8 to the current 12.4 pounds per day in 2018/2019, an increase of 8.9%
from the previous fiscal year.
Of all the priority pollutant heavy metals, 60
only two, copper and zinc, were found in
significantly greater concentrations than 50
remaining metals. The sum of mass of
copper and zinc represents 94% of 40
heavy metals found in the influent, and
represents 86% of what is found in the 30 — INFLUENT
effluent, with zinc being the overall
heavy meal contributor. IRWD analyzes o 20
for metals by ICP-MS, which is capable a. -.11-)V
of reporting metals in the sub part per 10
billion range. Figure 7.2 shows the
annual mass of total heavy metals in the 0 EFFLUENT
influent and effluent of MWRP. The 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 2015 2019
major contributing heavy metal Is zinc. Figure 7.2 MWRP Influent and Effluent Total Heavy Metals
Irvine Ranch Water District—Michelson Water Recycling Plant
Orange County Sanitation District
Copper
14 The major sources of copper are domestic
water systems and the printed circuit board
12 industry. Both residential and nonresidential
10 water plumbing are predominantly copper.
AINFLUENT Currently, IRWD does not have printed
8 circuit board manufacturing in the MWRP
6 service area. The major commercial source
of copper is believed to be radiator repair;
4 however, copper from radiator repair
a activities is declining since many of the
2 EFFL newer radiators are made from aluminum
o and plastic. Growth in the area tributary to
1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 2015 2019 MWRP has begun to increase over the last
Figure 7.3 MWRP Influent and Effluent Copper few years, and the increase in the amount of
Irvine Ranch Water District—Michelson Water Recycling Plant copper being discharged could potentially be
Orange County Sanitation District from new copper plumbing.
7.4
Figure 7.3 shows that the mass of copper in the influent has increased over the 36-year period from 3.5 to
13.3 Ibs/day during the 2018/2019 fiscal year. The mass of copper entering the treatment plant increased
by 34.6% from the 2017/2018 daily average. However, the mass of copper in the effluent decreased by
8.5% from the previous fiscal year.
Zinc
Zinc is the predominant heavy metal 30
detected in both the influent and
effluent. The major sources of zinc are 25
brass alloys used in domestic water
systems, water and oil based paints 20
used by the building industry, and in
chemicals and coatings used by 15
industry.
Figure 7.4 shows that the mass of zinc 10 INFLUENT AA
in the influent has increased from 4.6 c'
Ibs/day to 24.9 Ibs/day over 36 years. a
The influent mass of zinc increased by 5 EFFLUENT
1.2 Ibs/day or a 5.2% increase from the
previous fiscal year. The mass of zinc
in the effluent has increased from 1 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 2015 2019
Ibs/day to 9.7 Ibs/day over the last 36 Figure 7.4 MWRP Influent and Effluent Zinc
years and saw an increase of 0.3 Irvine Ranch Water District—Michelson Water Recycling Plant
Ibs/day, or 4.1%, from the previous Orange County Sanitation District
fiscal year.
7.3.4 Organic Pollutants
IRWD has been analyzing for organic pollutants on the list of organic priority pollutants at MWRP since
1983. The sampling frequency has increased from once per year to quarterly sampling. Samples are
collected from the influent, effluent, and sludge.
Figure 7.5 shows the annual mass of 25
total organic pollutants in the influent
and effluent of MWRP. Over the last
36 years, the annual mass of total 20
organic pollutants entering MWRP
has widely varied and has decreased
from a high of 16.82 Ibs/day to the 15
current 1.1 Ibs/day. The mass of total E FLUENTi—>
organic priority pollutants leaving
MWRP decreased from 18.1 Ibs/day 10
in 2017/2018 to 15.8 Ibs/day this a
fiscal year. The general increase in
effluent organic pollutants above 5
influent levels is attributed to an
increase in trihalomethanes and INFLUENT
other volatile organic compounds 0
resulting from final effluent 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 2015 2019
chlorination required to meet Figure 7.5 MWRP Influent and Effluent Total Toxic Organics
Irvine Ranch Water District—Michelson Water Recycling Plant
California Title 22 Water Recycling Orange County Sanitation District
Criteria.
7.5
IRWD has completed its 10 MGD biological nitrogen removal membrane filtration plant expansion at the
MWRP and the plant is now operating within its design capacity. The UV Disinfection system went online
November 2015 and the effluent total toxic organics concentration and mass has been reduced as the
concentration of trihalomethanes and other volatile organic compounds resulting from effluent chlorination
has been reduced. The reduction is not as great as expected as flows through the MBR were reduced over
this last wet winter.
7.3.5 Report of Upset, Pass-Through and Interference Events
The discharger shall submit annually...a discussion of upset, interference, or pass-through incidents, if any,
at the POTW which the discharger knows or suspects were caused by industrial users of the POTW
system...
There were no upsets, interference or pass-through incidents caused by industrial users during the
reporting period.
7.3.6 Discussion of the List of Industrial Users
The discharger shall submit annually...an updated list of the discharger's significant industrial users...
Table 7.1 summarizes those companies in Revenue Zones Nos. 7 and 14 which were under permit and in
business as of June 30, 2019. Class I industrial users in Revenue Zone 7 discharge to the IRWD collection
system and are treated at OCSD's treatment plant. Class I industrial users in Revenue Zone 14 discharge
to the IRWD collection system and are treated at MWRP and at OCSD's treatment plant.
Table 7.1 Class 1 Industries Within Irvine Ranch Water District Service Areas
Permit No. Facility Name Physical Address NAICS Classification Plant
Code
3M ESPE Dental Dental Equipment
Z-371301 Products 2111 McGaw Ave. (Irvine) 339114 and Supplies OCSD
Manufacturing
Alliance Medical Pharmaceutical
1-541182 Products, Inc. 9342 Jeronimo Rd. (Irvine) 325412 Preparation IRWD
Manufacturing
Search, Detection,
Navigation, Guidance,
Z-361006 Ametek Aerospace, 17032 Armstrong Ave. 334511 Aeronautical, and OCSD
Inc. (Irvine) Nautical System and
Instrument
Manufacturing
Anchen Pharmaceutical
1-541180 Pharmaceuticals, 72 Fairbanks (Irvine) 325412 Preparation IRWD
Inc. (Fairbanks) Manufacturing
Anchen Pharmaceutical
1-600359 Pharmaceuticals, 5 Goodyear(Irvine) 325412 Preparation IRWD
Inc. (Goodyear) Manufacturing
Anchen Pharmaceutical
1-541179 Pharmaceuticals, 9601 Jeronimo Rd. (Irvine) 325412 Preparation IRWD
Inc. (Jeronimo) Manufacturing
7.6
Table 7.1 Class 1 Industries Within Irvine Ranch Water District Service Areas
Permit No. Facility Name Physical Address NAICS Classification Plant
Code
Biological Product
1-571332 Avid Bioservices, Inc. 14191 Myford Rd. (Tustin) 325414 (except Diagnostic) IRWD
Manufacturing
B. Braun Medical, Pharmaceutical
Inc. (East/Main)
1-071054 2525 McGaw Ave. (Irvine) 325412 Preparation OCSD
Manufacturing
B. Braun Medical, 2206 Alton Parkway Pharmaceutical
1-600382 325412 Preparation OCSD
Inc. (North/Alton) (Irvine)
Manufacturing
B. Braun Medical, Pharmaceutical
1-541183 Inc. (West/Lake) 2525 McGaw Ave. (Irvine) 325412 Preparation OCSD
Manufacturing
Brothers Ice Cream and
1-600583 International 1682 Kettering St. (Irvine) 311520 Frozen Dessert OCSD
Desserts (North) Manufacturing
Brothers Ice Cream and
1-600582 International 1682 Kettering St. (Irvine) 311520 Frozen Dessert OCSD
Desserts (West) Manufacturing
Ceradyne, Inc., a 3M Dental Equipment
1-600691 Company 17466 Daimler St. (Irvine) 339114 and Supplies OCSD
Manufacturing
Motor Vehicle
1-571316 CP-Carrillo, Inc. 1902 McGaw Ave. (Irvine) 336310 Gasoline Engine and OCSD
Engine Parts
Manufacturing
Electroplating,
1-071162 Electrolurgy, Inc. 1121 Duryea Ave. (Irivne) 332813 Plating, Polishing, OCSD
Anodizing, and
Coloring
FMH Aerospace Fluid Power Valve
1-571331 Corp DBA FMH 17072 Daimler St. (Irvine) 332912 and Hose Fitting OCSD
Corporation Manufacturing
FMH Aerospace Fluid Power Valve
1-600585 Corp. 7072 Daimler St. (Irvine) 332912 and Hose Fitting OCSD
p Manufacturing
1-571314 Graphic Packaging 1600 Barranca Pkwy. 322212 Folding Paperboard OCSD
International, Inc. (Irvine) Box Manufacturing
2502 Barranca Pkwy. Ice Cream and
1-541178 Imuraya USA, Inc. 311520 Frozen Dessert OCSD
(Irvine) Manufacturing
1-571327 Irvine Ranch Water 1221 Edinger Ave. (Tustin) 221310 Water Supply and OCSD
District Irrigation Systems
7.7
Table 7.1 Class 1 Industries Within Irvine Ranch Water District Service Areas
Permit No. Facility Name Physical Address NAICS Classification Plant
Code
Kraft Heinz Mayonnaise,
1-071056 Company(formerly 2450 White Rd. (Irvine) 311941 Dressing, and Other OCSD
Todds,A Division of HJ Prepared Sauce
Heinz, LLC) Manufacturing
Dry Pasta, Dough,
1-071024 Maruchan, Inc. 1902 Deere Ave. (Irvine) 311824 and Flour Mixes OCSD
(Deere) Manufacturing from
Purchased Flour
Dry Pasta, Dough,
1-141015 Maruchan, Inc. 15800 Laguna Canyon Rd. 311824 and Flour Mixes IRWD
(Laguna Cyn) (Irvine) Manufacturing from
Purchased Flour
1-141023 Marukome USA, Inc. 17132 Pullman St. (Irvine) 311991 Perishable Prepared OCSD
Food Manufacturing
14600 Myford Road Other Measuring and
1-600006 Meggitt, Inc. 334519 Controlling Device OCSD
(Irvine) Manufacturing
Analytical Laboratory
1-071038 Newport Corporation 1791 Deere Ave. (Irvine) 334516 Instrument OCSD
Manufacturing
1-141012 Oakley, Inc. 1 Icon (Foothill Ranch) 339115 Ophthalmic Goods IRWD
Manufacturing
Parker Hannifin Fluid Power Valve
1-141002 Corporation 14300 Alton Pkwy. (Irvine) 332912 and Hose Fitting IRWD
Manufacturing
1-071235 Prudential Overall 16901 Aston St. (Irvine) 812332 Industrial Launderers OCSD
Supply
1-571303 Rayne Dealership 17835 Sky Park Cir. 454390 Other Direct Selling OCSD
Corporation (Irvine) Establishments
Bolt, Nut, Screw,
1-600297 Shur-Lok Company 2541 White Road (Irvine) 332722 Rivet, and Washer OCSD
Manufacturing
1-600565 South Coast Baking, 1711 Kettering St. (Irvine) 311821 Cookie and Cracker OCSD
LLC Manufacturing
TC Cosmotronic, Bare Printed Circuit
1-571309 Inc., DBA 16721 Noyes Ave. (Irvine) 334412 Board Manufacturing OCSD
Cosmotronic
Teva Parenteral Pharmaceutical
1-141007 Medicines, Inc. 19 Hughes (Irvine) 325412 Preparation IRWD
Manufacturing
Tropitone Furniture Metal Household
1-141163 Co., Inc. 5 Marconi (Irvine) 337124 Furniture IRWD
Manufacturing
7.8
Table 7.1 Class 1 Industries Within Irvine Ranch Water District Service Areas
Permit No. Facility Name Physical Address NAICS Classification Plant
Code
Vit-Best Nutrition Medicinal and
1-600010 2832 Dow Ave. (Tustin) 325411 Botanical IRWD
Inc. Manufacturing
7.3.7 Discussion of Industrial User Compliance Status
The discharger shall submit annually...a list or table characterizing the industrial compliance status of each
SIU...
The compliance status of each noncompliant SIU is shown in OCSD's Pretreatment Program Annual
Report.
7.3.8 Summary of SIU Compliance
The District shall submit annually...a compliance summary table...
A summary of compliance is shown in OCSD's Pretreatment Program Annual Report.
7.3.9 Discussion of Significant Changes in the Pretreatment Program
The District shall submit annually...a short description of any significant changes in operating the
pretreatment program which differ from the previous year...
There were no significant changes in operating the pretreatment program between the 2017/2018 and
2018/2019 fiscal years.
7.3.10 Pretreatment Program Costs
The District shall submit annually...a summary of the annual pretreatment budget and the pretreatment
equipment purchases...
A financial summary of IRWD's pretreatment program is shown in Table 8.2. All of the expenses shown in
Table 7.2 are related to the operation of IRWD's pretreatment program by IRWD staff. All expenses
incurred by IRWD under the Memorandum of Understanding between IRWD and OCSD are summarized
by OCSD.
7.9
Table 7.2 Summary of Irvine Ranch Water District Pretreatment Program Costs
2018-2019 and 2017-2018
Orange County Sanitation District/IRWD
2018-2019 2017-2018
Project Description
No. Labor Labor
3093 Quarterly PP $2,871 $3,140
3094 Baseline PP $1,153 $285
3095 PP Surveillance $552 $2,294
3096 Compat. Surveillance $5,278 $8,528
3098 Industry. Info. Collection $112,322 $85,777
3099 Eval Data/Rpts. $1753 $16,163
3100 OCSD/SOCWA $5,965 $271
Total $129,894 $116,458
IRWD records expenses based on project numbers which represent specific activities or groups of related
activities. During fiscal year 2018/2019, IRWD spent $129,894 on the operation of its pretreatment
program, which is an increase of$13,436 from the previous year.
7.3.11 Equipment Purchases for FY 2018/2019
IRWD maintained its existing equipment inventory as shown in Table 7.3
Table 7.3 Summary of Irvine Ranch Water District Pretreatment Equipment, Fiscal Year
2018-2019
Orange County Sanitation District/IRWD
II Quantity I Description
1 Ford F250
1 Sigma Ultrasonic Flowmeters with Conductivity and pH
4 Sigma AS 950 portable compact Autosampler with pH
2 Sigma 900 Max Insulated Autosamplers with Conductivity and pH
1 Sigma SD 900 insulated Autosamplers
3 Sigma compact insulated auto sampler base (spare base)—24 bottle configuration
3 Sigma large insulated autosampler base - 24 bottle configuration
2 Sigma large insulated autosampler base - 12 bottle configuration
6 Sigma Lead-Acid Gel Cell Battery
3 Sigma Battery Charger, 5 Stations
2 Sigma Data Transfer Unit (DTU) and Software
2 USB Flash drive
2 Digital pH probe
1 Analog pH probe
3 Analog Electrical conductivity probes
1 MSA gas detector
7.10
7.3.12 Discussion of Public Participation Activities
The District shall submit annually...a summary of public participation activities...
IRWD has a standing program of MWRP tours, where the public is instructed on the sewage collection and
treatment, as well as proper hazardous waste disposal practices. As Revenue Zones Nos. 7 and 14, IRWD
is represented by OCSD in its public participation activities. As an operator of a sewage collection system,
IRWD is enrolled under the statewide general permit to manage fats, oils and grease discharges from food
service establishments. The public participation program is administered by IRWD staff.
7.3.13 Discussion of Sludge Disposal Activities
The District shall submit annually...a description of any changes in sludge disposal methods...
IRWD has not made changes in sludge disposal methods at this time. However, IRWD began construction
in October 2013 of its Biosolids and Resource Recovery Project, that will consist of solids thickening, acid-
phase anaerobic digestion, dewatering, drying/pelletizing, energy generation using microturbines, and use
of pellets as a fertilizer or a-fuel. With completion of this project towards the end of 2020, IRWD will no
longer send its solids to OCSD for treatment.
7.3.14 IRWD Additional Information
The District shall submit annually...any concerns not described elsewhere in the report.
Michelson Water Recycling Plant Flow
Figure 7.6 shows the wastewater 22
flow received by MWRP over the last 20
36 years. MWRP flow has generally
increased over the years with a few o 18
exceptions. Average flow for the N 16
2018/2019 fiscal year was 18.3 0
MGD, which was a 9.4% decrease � 14
from the previous fiscal year. The 12
decrease in influent flow can be o
attributed to the wet winter = 10
experienced recently, where IRWD 8
had to divert sewage at a higher 6
volume than normal from MWRP to
OCSD for treatment. 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 2015 2019
Figure 7.6 MWRP Influent Flow
Irvine Ranch Water District—Michelson Water Recycling Plant
Orange County Sanitation District
Nitrification/Denitrification Facilities
IRWD completed a significant upgrade to MWRP by installing a nitrification/denitrification system on its
activated sludge system in the 1998-99 fiscal year. Plant effluent is now fully nitrified year round and
substantially denitrified during the months when recycled water is stored in IRWD open storage reservoirs.
A fully nitrified effluent means that IRWD maintains a free chlorine residual rather than a combined chlorine
residual. A free chlorine residual causes a greater formation of trihalomethanes and related volatile organic
compounds, which is evident by the presence of total toxic organic compounds in the effluent. Fortunately,
the quality of plant effluent, detention time in the plant, and short time before storage or use, keeps the level
of toxic organic compounds below regulatory criteria, even though a relatively high chlorine dose is required
to maintain bacterial quality. The operation of the nitrification/denitrification system has improved activated
sludge operations, which in turn, has increased the quality of recycled water.
7.11
Industrial Parks Development Status
Since the early 1980's, MWRP has been receiving increased industrial wastewater flows from the Irvine
Spectrum. The industrial parks located with IRWD's service area are primarily the Irvine Spectrum, a large
industrial park located near the former El Toro Marine Corps Air Station and the Foothill Ranch industrial
area, located north and east of the El Toro Marine Corps Air Station. The El Toro Marine Corps Air Station
is decommissioned and will be the site of the Great Park Development,a master planned community. IRWD
sees the potential for gradually increasing levels of organic pollutants and heavy metals as the Irvine
Spectrum industrial park and Foothill Ranch sites continue to expand and develop. The University of
California, Irvine is expanding the University Research Park located on the southern portion of the
university. IRWD sees a potential for organic priority pollutant and heavy metal discharges from the
industrial/research parks.
Stormwater, Deminimis Discharges and Selenium
In May 2009, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board adopted the fourth term Waste
Discharge Requirements for the County of Orange, Orange, County Flood Control District, and Incorporated
Cities of Orange County Within the Santa Ana Region Areawide Stormwater Runoff Orange County, Order
R8-2009-0030. A condition of this permit is a requirement that non-stormwater discharges be prohibited
from discharge into the storm drain system except for urban runoff and certain authorized non-stormwater
discharges. As a result, there has been an increase of non-wastewater discharges into the sewer system.
In general, these discharges contribute to the hydraulic loading to the sewer system and have not been a
significant source of conventional and other pollutants.
The northeastern side of the Irvine Basin is dominated by coastal foothills, and historically runoff from the
foothills deposited in a seasonal marsh called the Cienega de las Ranas. Natural weathering of the coastal
foothills has exposed and eroded the Monterey Formation containing significant amounts of selenium,
which over time have accumulated in the seasonal marsh. In addition to runoff, rising groundwater in the
area of the seasonal marsh has raised the concentration of selenium in surface water well above the
California Toxics Rule criterion of 5 pg/L. The seasonal marsh has been drained, first to promote
agriculture, and then the agricultural land has been converted into urban development. Surface waters in
the watershed are listed on the Section 303(d) list for selenium impairment, and discharges of water into
the surface water system above 5 tag/L are regulated under the Basin Plan.
The effect of the additional prohibition of 5
non-stormwater discharging into the storm
drain system has resulted in additional non- 4.5
stormwater flows being discharged into the 4 INFLUENT
sewer system containing significant levels 3.5
of selenium from groundwater dewatering _j
operations. Some of the discharges are 3
tributary to OCSD's sewer system, and the .S 2.5
selenium is ultimately returned into the E 2 EFFLUENT
ocean. However, some of the discharges
are tributary to the IRWD sewer system. a) 1.5
IRWD has been tracking the fate and 1
transport of selenium since 2002 to garner 0.5
knowledge on the effect of the additional
non-stormwater discharges on MWRP 0
effluent quality. During this last fiscal year, 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
the average effluent selenium concentration Figure 7.7 MWRP Influent and Effluent Selenium
was approximately 1.7 pg/L, a little under Irvine Ranch Water District—Michelson Water Recycling Plant
half the California Toxics Rule criterion. Orange County Sanitation District
Prior to 2002, the concentration of selenium
in the wastewater was negligible, because there was no selenium in the domestic water supply, there were
7.12
no industries discharging selenium and non-wastewater discharges into the sewer system were prohibited.
Because selenium toxicity is based on concentration, IRWD will continue to monitor the concentration of
selenium in the influent and effluent from the MWRP.
IRWD Oversight Activities
IRWD has monitored four major trunklines within its service area for priority pollutants. Commercial,
residential and industrial areas were monitored on an annual basis. One purpose of this monitoring is to
establish a long-term history of priority pollutant discharges into the sewer system. Phthalates are used to
maintain flexibility in plastic products and are commonly found.The low concentrations of these constituents
are common and are considered emerging pollutants of concern.
Additionally, within the IRWD service area, industrial activities are regulated by the City of Irvine General
Plan and Zoning Ordinances, which confines industrial uses to specific zones and the City of Lake Forest,
which is the agency currently responsible for the Foothill Ranch Master Plan. Currently, IRWD is
reassessing it's monitoring programs and locations.
The IRWD service area encompasses the San Diego Creek watershed, the largest watershed that is
tributary to Newport Bay. Newport Bay and its tributary watersheds are subject to Total Maximum Daily
Load (TMDL) allocations for sediment, nutrients, pathogens, and toxics. IRWD does not discharge
wastewater into surface waters, other than its open storage reservoirs; however, as the sole purveyor of
water and recycled water in the watershed, IRWD has chosen to become involved with water quality
management in the watershed. IRWD is constructing and managing wetlands, under the Natural Treatment
Systems Project, which will remove pollutants of concern to the TMDL allocations. IRWD extends its
services to assist commercial and industrial users to recognize the importance of site runoff water quality,
point out sources of contamination and areas of potential contamination, and advice on corrective
measures.
Local Limits Study
Due to the completion of IRWD's Phase II Expansion at MWRP, as well as the construction of a solids and
biosolids handling facility, IRWD decided to undertake a technical evaluation of its local limits that began in
2016, and was completed and submitted to the Regional Board for their approval in October 2016. The
local limits study evaluated if IRWD's current limits are protective of not only the new unit processes within
IRWD, but were also protective enough to ensure that IRWD can produce Class A EQ biosolids, as well as
potentially evaluate additional pollutants of concern. IRWD received approval of its local limits by the
Regional Board in 2018 and had them adopted by its Board in May 2018.
7.4 SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY (SAWPA)
OCSD has a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for ocean discharge
and is the Control Authority for the Pretreatment Program required by federal regulations. Because
SAWPA discharges to OCSD through the SARI Line, SAWPA is subject to OCSD's Pretreatment
Program. Through a 1991 Memorandum of Understanding (1991 MOU), OCSD enabled SAWPA to
be OCSD's Delegated Control Authority for the Pretreatment Program in SAWPA's SARI Service Area.
SAWPA's responsibilities to run a Pretreatment Program on behalf of OCSD, ability to discharge to
the SARI Line, and other financial factors are governed by agreements between OCSD and SAWPA,
including the 1991 MOU and a 1996 Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Agreement (1996
Agreement), as amended and succeeded. OCSD routinely reviews all SAWPA Commission,
Commission Workshop, and Project meeting agendas and minutes to stay current with the activities
in the SAWPA area that may have an impact on the SAWPA Pretreatment Program. In addition, OCSD
routinely meets with SAWPA to coordinate at administrative,technical, management, and leadership levels
with varying levels of staff in attendance at each meeting to improve the coordination between OCSD's and
7.13
SAWPA's Pretreatment Programs and to enhance the working relationship with SAWPA in all areas of the
1991 MOU and 1996 Agreement.
SAWPA was formed in 1968 to develop a long-range plan for managing, preserving, and protecting the
quality of water supplies in the Santa Ana Basin. SAWPA is a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) consisting of
five agencies: Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA), Orange
County Water District (OCWD), San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (Valley District), and
Western Municipal Water District(WMWD). SAWPA's program in water quality management is integrated
with those of other local, state, and federal agencies.
The Inland Empire Brine Line (Brine Line) is a pipeline that is designed to carry saline wastewater from the
Upper Basin to the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD)for disposal, after treatment, into the Pacific
Ocean. This wastewater today consists primarily of desalter brine and saline wastewater from industrial
uses, but also has some temporary domestic discharges. Wastewater from the Brine Line is transferred to
the SARI Line in Orange County which transports the wastewater to OCSD Plant 2. A flow meter installed
at the SARI Metering Station measures SAWPA's discharge. For the 12-month period from July 1, 2018
through June 30, 2019, a total of 3,728 MG was discharged into the Brine Line, for an average of 10.21
MGD, which leaves about 19.8 MGD of trunk line capacity available for future use. The flow
meter/monitoring station at the Orange County line is sampled weekly by SAWPA and monthly by OCSD.
7.4.1 Brine Line System Pretreatment Program Overview
SAWPA has a wastewater discharge ordinance applicable to the Brine Line. It is essentially, with some
appropriate modifications, substantially similar to OCSD's Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance.
In addition, a Memorandum of Understanding is in place to delineate pretreatment permitting, monitoring,
enforcement, and reporting responsibilities between SAWPA and OCSD. SAWPA has entered into a
Multijurisdictional Pretreatment Agreement (Agreement)with the Member Agencies, EMWD, IEUA, Valley
District, and WMWD and Contract Agencies, Jurupa Community Services District(JCSD), San Bernardino
Municipal Water Department (SBMWD), and Yucaipa Valley Water District (YVWD). This Agreement
delineates the pretreatment responsibilities between SAWPA and the agencies to carry out and enforce a
pretreatment program to control discharges from Industrial Users (IU) located in their service areas.
SAWPA owns and operates the Brine Line above or upstream of the Orange County line and has purchased
17 MGD of treatment and disposal capacity rights at OCSD's treatment facilities. SAWPA, through the
MOU with OCSD, has the ultimate responsibility to ensure adequate implementation of Pretreatment
Program responsibilities in the Upper Basin portion of the Brine Line. SAWPA issues permits to Direct and
Indirect Dischargers jointly with Member and Contract Agencies and solely issues permits to all Member
and Contract Agency owned or affiliated Direct and Indirect Dischargers. In addition, SAWPA has the
Permitting responsibilities for all Liquid Waste Haulers(LWH)that use the four SAWPA-approved Collection
Stations. The SAWPA LWH permits assign, for each discharger, a primary collection station and alternate
collection stations should the primary collection station become unavailable due to repairs or closure.
Agency staff assists in the conduct of the program for non-agency permittees within their service area.
SAWPA conducts all pretreatment oversight activities for agency owned or affiliated permittees. SAWPA
has identified, categorized and summarized the permits herein by geographical location and support from
the Member and Contract Agencies. Roles and responsibilities are defined in SAWPA's policies and
procedures. SAWPA has two dedicated full-time pretreatment personnel and an additional 1.6 full-time
equivalent(FTE)to assist with pretreatment responsibilities. Combined, the 3.6 FTE, along with additional
personnel from both Member and Contract Agencies, prepared and issued permits, conducted inspections,
prepared enforcement actions, and prepared monthly, quarterly, and annual reports by the date required.
7.14
Compliance and billing parameters are sampled at direct and indirect dischargers in accordance with
SAWPA's policies and procedures. All samples are properly preserved and iced for transport to the
laboratory. Chapter tables show the mass of pollutants as they were measured at OCSD's SARI Metering
Station (SMS) at the Orange County line. The data is based on average daily flow unless otherwise noted.
During the reporting period SAWPA continued implementation of numerous program documents and
worked to improve the operation and implementation of the Pretreatment Program. SAWPA and the
Member and Contract Agencies use Pretreatment Program Control Documents (PPCDs) for uniform and
consistent implementation of the Pretreatment Program. Updates to the PPCDs as well as the permit
templates for Categorical Industrial Users (CIU), Significant Industrial Users (SIU), IU, and LWH are in
development. A Data Management System (iPACS) continued to be used.
Reporting below is individually presented for each SAWPA Pretreatment Program Member and Contract
Agency.
7.4.2 SAWPA, Member Agency, and Contract Agency Pretreatment Programs
7.4.2.1 Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD)
Description of EMWD
EMWD is a Municipal Water District responsible for the implementation of certain pretreatment
activities for the indirect and direct industries that discharge to EMWD's Non-Reclaimable Waste
Line, which discharges to the Brine Line at Reach V. In the face of declining groundwater levels
and continuing droughts, EMWD was formed in 1950 to secure additional water for a lightly
populated area of western Riverside County. EMWD joined the Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California a year later to augment its local supplies with recently available imported
water. EMWD also provides sewer service throughout its area. The EMWD headquarters are
located in Perris, California and serves the eastern portion of the watershed in Riverside County,
as well as portions of the Santa Margarita Watershed, south of the Santa Ana River Watershed.
Enforcement Actions
There was no enforcement action during this reporting period.
7.4.2.2 Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA)
Description of IEUA
IEUA is a Municipal Water District responsible for the implementation of certain pretreatment
program activities for the direct and indirect industries located within IEUA's service area. IEUA,
originally named the Chino Basin Municipal Water District(CBMWD),was formed in 1950 to supply
supplemental water to the region. Since its formation, the Agency has expanded its areas of
responsibility from a supplemental water supplier to a regional wastewater treatment agency with
domestic and industrial disposal systems and energy recovery/production facilities. In addition, the
Agency has become a recycled water purveyor, bio-solids/fertilizer treatment provider and
continues as a leader in water supply salt management, for the purpose of protecting the region's
vital groundwater supplies.
IEUA strives to enhance the quality of life in the Inland Empire by providing optimum water
resources management for the area's customers while promoting conservation and environmental
protection. IEUA covers 242-square miles, distributes imported water, provides industrial/municipal
7.15
wastewater collection and treatment services, and other related utility services to more than
850,000 people. The Agency's service area includes the Cities of Chino, Chino Hills, Fontana,
Montclair, Ontario and Upland,as well as the Cucamonga Valley Water District and the Monte Vista
Water District.
Enforcement Actions
• California Institution for Men (Permit No. D1006-3)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action (NOV/OCA)was issued to California
Institution for Men (CIM) on January 10, 2019 for failure to properly operate and maintain
the nitric acid dosing system. The NOV/OCA required CIM to immediately replenish the
acid holding tank and properly operate the dosing system, investigate the cause of the
violation, and submit a written report detailing its findings along with a corrective action
plan designed to bring the facility into consistent compliance with its wastewater permit.
CIM provided the written report and corrective action plan on January 17, 2019, attributing
the violation as a result of the nitric acid being ordered but not received due to the fact the
contract with the chemical supplier had expired. Additionally, CIM attributed lack of
communication to appropriate administrative personnel as the cause of the depletion of the
acid tank. The acid tank was replenished on November 16, 2018. The corrective action
plan stated CIM will report weekly to the Associate Warden of Business Services regarding
chemical supplies and establish a trigger point for re-ordering acid. CIM Implemented the
corrective actions identified above; subsequently, the enforcement action was closed.
IEUA shall continue to conduct unannounced inspections and wastewater monitoring at
CIM to ensure consistent compliance with permit requirements and SAWPA Ordinance No.
8.
• California Institution for Women (Permit No. D1007-3)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action (NOV/OCA)was issued to California
Institution for Women (CIW) on April 11, 2019 for a pollutant limitation violation. On July
19, 2018 CIW collected a wastewater sample from Monitoring Point 001. The Laboratory
analysis result indicated a 1,4-Dioxane concentration of 140 mg/L,which exceeds the Local
Daily Maximum Discharge Limitation of 1.0 mg/L as stated by Permit. The NOV/OCA
required CIW to resample for 1,4-Dioxane. Furthermore, the permittee was required to
investigate the cause of the violation, and submit a written report detailing its findings along
with a corrective action plan designed to bring the facility into consistent compliance with
its wastewater permit. CIW provided the report and corrective action plan on May 10,
2019, stating the permittee had reviewed the entire hazardous material and waste
inventory and 1,4-Dioxane was not found in any of these materials. CIW believed the July
2018, 1,4-Dioxane result was incorrect as the constituent had previously never been
detected in their wastewater and no changes have occurred at its facility which could cause
this violation. After an extensive review of the historic 1,4-Dioxane results from samples
taken at its facility, CIW believed the sample from July 19, 2018, may have been analyzed
and/or reported incorrectly by the contract laboratory. Permittee stated its contract
laboratory has added permit limits to its database so Permittee can be notified should
another constituent violation occur. Implementation of the corrective actions identified
above and follow-up sampling indicated compliance; subsequently,the enforcement action
was closed. IEUA shall continue to conduct unannounced inspections and wastewater
monitoring at CIW to ensure consistent compliance with permit requirements and SAWPA
Ordinance No. 8.
7.16
• Eastside Water Treatment Facility (Permit No. 11024-2.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action (NOV/OCA) was issued to Eastside
Water Treatment Facility (Eastside) on June 26, 2019 for a pollutant limitation violation.
On June 4, 2019, IEUA collected a wastewater sample from Monitoring Point 002. The pH
field analysis indicated the pH was 5.3 SU which exceeded the Local Daily Minimum
Discharge Limitation of 6.0 SU as stated by Permit. The NOV/OCA required Eastside to
submit a written report detailing the cause of the violation and corrective actions on or
before July 10, 2019. Furthermore, the permittee is required to test the pH of every
wastewater load to ensure compliance prior to transporting them to the collection station.
• ShawCor Pipe Protections, LLC (Permit No. 11077-2.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action (NOV/OCA)was issued to ShawCor
Pipe Protections, LLC (ShawCor) on June 13, 2018 by SAWPA for the late submittal of
SMR's for the months of May 2017, September 2017, November 2017, and April 2018. In
addition, the NOV/OCA was also issued for the April 9, 2018 wastewater sample, collected
at the IEUA Collection Station (MP 002),which indicated a Zinc analysis result of 3.93 mg/L
and a Chromium analysis result of 4.42 mg/L violations of the Federal Daily Maximum
Limitation of 2.61 mg/L for Zinc and 2.77 mg/L for Chromium and the Federal Monthly
Average Discharge of 1.48 mg/L for Zinc and 1.71 mg/L for Chromium. The NOV/OCA
required ShawCor to attend a Violation Meeting at SAWPA on July 2, 2018 to discuss the
violations and for ShawCor to propose solutions prior to issuance of future enforcement if
necessary. ShawCor responded as required on July 2, 2018 and attended the mandatory
Violation Meeting the same day to present their response and corrective action plan.
ShawCor attributed the late report submittals to staff turnover. New personnel were not
made aware of the reporting requirements. ShawCor instituted new calendar procedures
to ensure reports are submitted as required. ShawCor attributed the Zinc and Chromium
violations to a buildup of solids in the batch discharge holding tanks. The tanks were
cleaned to remove the excess solids and a standard cleaning procedure has been
established going forward. Implementation of the corrective actions identified above and
follow-up sampling indicated compliance; subsequently, the enforcement action was
closed. IEUA shall continue to conduct unannounced inspections and wastewater
monitoring at ShawCor to ensure consistent compliance with permit requirements and
SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
7.4.2.3 Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD)
Description of JCSD
JCSD is a public agency responsible for the implementation of certain pretreatment program
activities for the direct industries connected to the Brine Line via JCSD's sewer collection system
within its service area (Brine Line Reach IV-D). JCSD headquarters is located at 11201 Harrel
Street in the City of Jurupa Valley. JCSD was formed in 1956 and provides water, sewer, park
services,graffiti abatement,and street lighting. In 1988 the District formed the Community Facilities
District No. 1 to provide for water, sewer, flood control and street infrastructure within the industrial
portion of the Mira Loma area. The boundaries of CFD No. 1 expanded from 1,900 acres to 3,000
acres in 1992. In June 1989, JCSD contracted with WMWD for capacity in Reach IV-D of the Brine
Line.
7.17
Enforcement Action
• Del Real Foods, LLC (Permit No. D1021-2.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action (NOV/OCA) was issued to Del Real
Foods, LLC (Del Real) by JCSD on February 1, 2019 for pollutant limitation and
temperature exceedance violations. On January 27, 2019 Del Real LLC submitted pH and
temperature data records from the pH meter Monitoring Point 001,the permitted monitoring
point, via email as requested by JCSD staff. The pH of the industrial effluent discharged
exceeded the Local Daily Minimum Discharge Limitation of 6.0 S.U. as defined by Permit
on January 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 20, 25, and 26, 2019. Additionally,the temperature data
submitted with the pH data records indicated several temperatures as high as 186 degrees
Fahrenheit, exceeding the limit of 140 degrees Fahrenheit as stated in SAWPA Ordinance
8 Article 2 Section 201.OJ. The NOV/OCA required Del Real to submit a written report
detailing the cause of the violation and corrective actions to prevent recurrence of the
violation on or before February 18, 2019. Permittee responded on February 18, 2019 and
attributed the pH exceedances to erroneous readings of an unsecured probe in the
Monitoring Point 001 Manhole. Del Real replaced the probe and secured it in place in
Monitoring Point 001. Additional corrective actions taken by Del Real were to institute an
hourly pH probe cleaning and weekly pH probe calibration frequencies, change the DAF
set point from 6.5 to 8 S.U., installation of a pH dosing connection from the current DAF
Caustic tank to the DAF effluent sample box at the exit of the DAF to immediately correct
low pH discharges, and set the pH alarm to 7.0 S.0 for the low alarm and 11.0 S.0 for the
high alarm. Additionally, Del Real is to install a new pH dosing control system at Interceptor
3 for additional pH control of the facility. A new automated chemical control system will
incorporate a computer measured and controlled DAF chemical dosing system instead of
the current manual control. Both of these measures are to be completed by August 15,
2019. Del Real identified the discharge of the boiler blowdown as the cause of the
temperature exceedances. On February 22, 2019 Del Real completed installation of a new
three-quarter inch thermostatic mixing valve for the boiler blowdown flash tank to allow for
temperature regulation prior to discharge to Monitoring Point 001. No further temperature
exceedances have been identified following the installation of the mixing valve. As of June
30, 2019, JCSD continues to conduct unannounced inspections and wastewater
monitoring at Del Real to ensure consistent compliance with permit requirements and
SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
7.4.2.4 San Bernardino Municipal Water Department (SBMWD)
Description of SBMWD
SBMWD is a Municipal Water Department and is responsible for administering certain pretreatment
program activities for indirect industries associated with the SBMWD Brine Line Collection Station.
SBMWD provides potable water and sewerage services for the City of San Bernardino, in addition
to sewerage service for the cities of Loma Linda and Highland, as well as, some isolated county
areas. These services are augmented by the operation of a brine waste collection station which
provides an alternate disposal site for industries which generate high strength brine waste. The
SBMWD, under contract with the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, is responsible for
administering the pretreatment program associated with the SBMWD Brine Line Collection Station.
7.18
Enforcement Action
There was no enforcement action during this reporting period.
7.4.2.5 San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (Valley District)
Description of Valley District
Valley District is a Municipal Water District responsible for the implementation of certain
pretreatment program activities for the direct industries connected to the Brine Line within its
service area (Brine Line Reach IV-E). Valley District headquarters is located in the City of San
Bernardino and serves most of the northern and eastern reaches of the watershed in San
Bernardino County with a small portion of its service area in Riverside County. Valley District was
formed in 1954 to plan long-range water supply for the San Bernardino Valley. It is the only State
Water Contractor within SAWPA and imports water into its service area through participation in the
California State Water Project while also managing groundwater storage within its boundaries. It
was incorporated under the Municipal Water District Act of 1911 (California Water Code Section
7100 et seq., as amended). Its enabling act includes a broad range of powers to provide water, as
well as wastewater, stormwater disposal, recreation, and fire protection services.
Enforcement Action
• City of Colton -Agua Mansa Power Plant(Permit No. D1002-3.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action (NOV/OCA) was issued to City of
Colton - Agua Mansa Power Plant (Agua Mansa) by Valley District on July 23, 2018 for
failure to monitor as identified by Permit. Agua Mansa failed to sample within sampling
period and failed to sample for Ammonia, Molybdenum, Selenium, and 1,4-Dioxane, the
additional constituents added when their permit was amended on October 9, 2017. The
NOV/OCA acknowledged the Agua Mansa had already instituted corrective action by
scheduling the necessary sampling activities. The NOV/OCA required submittal of the
analysis results for the deficient sampling activities. Sampling was conducted on July 8,
2018 and again on July 25, 2018 and the results were submitted on July 19, 2018 and
August 2,2018. The sampling indicated compliance;subsequently,the enforcement action
was closed. Valley District shall continue to conduct unannounced inspections and
wastewater monitoring at Agua Mansa to ensure consistent compliance with permit
requirements and SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
• Mountainview Generating Station (Permit No. D1058-2)
Mountainview Generating Station collected self-monitoring samples from Monitoring Point
002 on April 19, 2019 and May 3, 2019. Furthermore, Valley District collected a sample
rom Monitoring Point 002 on June 25, 2019. Analysis of the April 19, 2019, May 3, 2019,
and June 25, 2019 samples indicated 126 Priority Pollutants concentrations of 0.071 mg/L,
0.1182 mg/L, and 0.1421 mg/L respectively. The maximum discharge limitation is for the
126 priority pollutants to have no detectable amount contained in the chemicals added for
cooling tower maintenance. Mountainview Generating Station submitted a report with their
analysis demonstrating the cooling tower maintenance chemicals have no detectable
amount of the 126 priority pollutants, and therefore the sampling events to do not any
violations. Valley District shall continue to conduct unannounced inspections and
7.19
wastewater monitoring at Mountainview Generating Station to ensure consistent
compliance with permit requirements and SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
7.4.2.6 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA)
Description of SAWPA
SAWPA is a Joint Powers Authority, classified as a Special District under State of California law,
responsible for the implementation of the pretreatment program for the industries connected to the
Brine Line. SAWPA consists of five Member Agencies; Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD),
Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA), Orange County Water District (OCWD), San Bernardino
Valley Municipal Water District (Valley District), and Western Municipal Water District (WMWD).
SAWPA, through the MOU with OCSD, has the ultimate responsibility to ensure adequate
implementation of Pretreatment Program responsibilities in the Upper Basin portion of the Brine
Line. SAWPA issues permits to Direct and Indirect Dischargers jointly with Member and Contract
Agencies and solely issues permits to all Member and Contract Agency owned or affiliated Direct
and Indirect Dischargers.
Enforcement Action
• Chino II Desalter(Permit No. D1010-3.1)
A Cease and Desist Order (Order) was issued to Chino II Desalter (Chino II) by SAWPA
on July 24, 2018 due to an accidental discharge of clarifier solids from the equalization
basin which entered the Brine Line through Monitoring Point 002. The Order required
Chino II immediately cease and desist the discharge of the noncompliant wastewater to
the Brine Line. Furthermore, Chino II was required to conduct and document Slug
Discharge Prevention and Control Plan training by no later than August 20, 2018. On
August 15, 2018 Chino II submitted their response which included the Slug Discharge
Prevention Control Plan Training Sign-in Sheet, the Training Outline Summary, and
documentation of the emergency contacts being posted in plant control rooms.
Implementation of the corrective actions identified above indicated compliance;
subsequently, the enforcement action was closed. SAWPA shall continue to conduct
unannounced inspections and wastewater monitoring at Chino II to ensure consistent
compliance with permit requirements and SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
• Del Real Foods, LLC (Permit No. D1021-2.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action (NOV/OCA) was issued to Del Real
Foods, LLC (Del Real) by SAWPA on July 14, 2016 for a bypass in the pretreatment wet
well and for exceedance of their Brine Line purchased capacity. The NOV/OCA required
Del Real to submit a corrective action plan regarding the bypass and to apply for additional
Brine Line capacity. Del Real repaired and made improvements to the existing alarm
system to the wet well, which was verified by SAWPA during inspection. Del Real also
installed and repaired screens for the production room drains. Del Real submitted a
request for additional Brine Line capacity and a Water Balance Report which detailed water
consumption and wastewater discharged to the Brine Line. Del Real agreed to purchase
an additional 163,000 gallons of Brine Line capacity and submitted the Water Balance
Report. Del Real has completed the requirements identified in the NOV/OCA. SAWPA
shall close the Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action upon issuance of a
7.20
revised wastewater discharge permit,which shall include additional reporting requirements
to ensure consistent compliance with SAWPA Ordinance No. 8 and SAWPA Local Limits
(Resolution No. 2017-11), or any successors thereto. This is anticipated to be completed
within the first quarter of FY19/20.
A Notice of Violation, Order for Corrective Action, and Significant Noncompliance Status
(NOV) was issued to Del Real Foods, LLC (Del Real) by SAWPA on May 15, 2019 for a
Local Daily Minimum Discharge Limitation violation for pH and failure to report said
violation within 24 hours of becoming aware of the violation. Furthermore, the permittee
failed to report said violation within 45 days of the required report due date placing the
facility in Significant Noncompliance for the 2nd and 3rd quarters of the 2018-2019 fiscal
year. The NOV/OCA required submittal of a written report detailing why the pH violation
was not reported as required and what corrective action would be taken to ensure future
violations of this nature do not occur again by May 29, 2019. The permittee responded
requesting an extension of the deadline until June 3, 2019, which was granted. The
permittee provided the report on June 3, 2019. The report identified the cause of the
reporting violation as a failure of staff to properly identify the violation and therefore
reporting was not made as required. The permittee will ensure proper personnel are
present during laboratory field analyses and the contract laboratory will be directly notifying
personnel should any further violations be identified so that notification can be made as
required. Additional enforcement has been issued for ongoing pH issues and investigation
into these violations is ongoing as required as identified in Section 8.6.2.3. Implementation
of the corrective actions identified above indicated compliance; subsequently, the
enforcement action is anticipated to be closed in July 2019. JCSD shall continue to conduct
unannounced inspections and wastewater monitoring at Del Real to ensure consistent
compliance with permit requirements and SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
• Inland Bioenergy, LLC (Permit No. D1072-3)
A Cease and Desist, Compliance, and Civil Penalty Order (Order) was issued to Inland
Bioenergy, LLC (Inland Bioenergy) by SAWPA on March 6, 2019 due to the January 2019
SMR indicating significantly high concentrations of BOD and TSS discharged to the Brine
Line. These discharges were determined to be Slug Discharges as described by SAWPA
Ordinance. Permittee was ordered to pay$7,000 in penalties for the Slug Discharges and
a supplemental charge for the excess BOD and TSS discharged. The permit was
suspended until SAWPA had determined that Inland Bioenergy can meet all the
requirements set forth in the Ordinance. On March 7, 2019 Inland Bioenergy issued a
response refuting the determination of slug discharges, however provided no reasoning for
such a response, and requested a meeting with SAWPA. On March 12, 2019 SAWPA
issued a response to Inland Bioenergy reaffirming the determination of the slug discharges
and scheduled a meeting to discuss further. The meeting was conducted on March 18,
2019 and SAWPA further demonstrated to Inland Bioenergy the determination of the slug
discharges as defined by Ordinance. SAWPA followed up by providing a written record on
March 20, 2019 of the meeting. Within the March 20, 2019 written record SAWPA revised
the line cleaning costs that had previously been assessed on Inland Bioenergy.
A Civil Penalty Order, Notice of Significant Noncompliance, and Termination of Service
was issued to Inland Bioenergy, LLC (Inland Bioenergy) by SAWPA on April 2, 2019 for
violations of the Ordinance and Permit No. 1072-3. The permittee was ordered to:
Immediately stop discharging to the Brine Line as all wastewater disposal services granted
7.21
to Inland Bioenergy pursuant to Permit No. D1072-3 were terminated; Provide manifests
for the legal disposal of the facility sludge and digester solids from January, February, and
March 2019 to SAWPA by April 4, 2019; and Provide an explanation for the water usage
by the Inland Bioenergy facility in January and February 2019 to SAWPA by April 4, 2019.
The water usage for the facility rose from 250,724 gallons per month in December of 2018
to 780,554 gallons per month in January 2019 and then again to 1,634,236 gallons per
month in February 2019. The explanation was to document the reason for the increase in
water usage as well as the disposal of the water from the site following its use at the facility.
Any supporting documents, such as waste manifests were to be included with the
explanation. Furthermore, Inland Bioenergy was ordered to pay to SAWPA on or before
April 4, 2019, a penalty totaling $47,000, pay the supplemental Biochemical Oxygen
Demand (BOD) and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) charges incurred by SAWPA for the
January and February 2019 Inland Bioenergy discharges, which totaled $121,342.48 for
January and February 2019. The permittee responded on April 3, 2019 requesting an
extension of these deadlines until April 9, 2019. SAWPA granted this request on April 4,
2019. On April 9, 2019 the permittee provided their responses to the Order and requested
a decrease in the penalty amount. The SAWPA General Manager agreed to this request
and on April 9, 2019 revised the penalty amount to$25,000. On April 9, 2019 the permittee
completed payment of the penalty and subsequently completed closure of the facility and
dissolution of the LLC. On April 11, 2019 the Order was closed.
• JCSD Chandler Lift Station (Permit No. E1043-2.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action (NOV/OCA) was issued to JCSD
Chandler Lift Station by SAWPA on November 15, 2018 for failure to sample for required
background monitoring from the designated monitoring location. The NOV/OCA required
a written report stating how future monitoring location violations will be prevented in the
future by no later than November 29, 2018. On November 29, 2018 the permittee
responded with a plan to request prior authorization from SAWPA prior to monitoring from
any, not previously authorized, monitoring location. Implementation of the corrective
actions identified above indicated compliance; subsequently, the enforcement action was
closed. SAWPA shall continue to conduct unannounced inspections and wastewater
monitoring at JCSD Chandler Lift Station to ensure consistent compliance with permit
requirements and SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
• JCSD Roger D. Teagarden Ion Exchange Water Treatment Plant (Permit No. D1070-
4)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action (NOV/OCA) was issued to JCSD
Roger D. Teagarden Ion Exchange Water Treatment Plant (Teagarden) by SAWPA on
November 15, 2018 for a violation of Permit. On October 23, 2018 JCSD personnel
discovered an accidental spill of Sodium Hypochlorite at Teagarden. The spill did not enter
the Brine Line and was properly cleaned and legally disposed of. However, during the
inspection conducted by SAWPA personnel on October 23, 2018 it was observed that the
spill containment wall was not sealed resulting in the spill, a violation of the requirements
of the Wastewater Discharge Permit mandating the spill containment system be
constructed of materials that are impermeable to the liquids being contained. The
NOV/OCA required Teagarden to provide a written report which details how the spill
7.22
containment wall will be constructed to prevent leakage of chemical spills and a timeline
for completion by November 29, 2018. The permittee requested an extension of the
deadline which was granted until December 11, 2018. The permittee provided the written
report on December 11, 2018 detailing a plan to seal the containment structure with a
maximum timeline for completion of 6 weeks. SAWPA approved the plan on December
17, 2018. The permittee requested an extension on the final due date due to complications
with the contractor bidding process. The request was granted by SAWPA until April 30,
2019. In the interim the facility did not operate, and chemicals were not stored in the
containment structure to ensure no further spills. On May 9, 2019 SAWPA conducted a
compliance inspection. The spill containment system was verified as repaired and in
compliance with the Ordinance. Implementation of the corrective actions identified above
indicated compliance; subsequently, the enforcement action was closed. SAWPA shall
continue to conduct unannounced inspections and wastewater monitoring at Teagarden to
ensure consistent compliance with permit requirements and SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
7.4.2.6.1 SAWPA Waste Hauler Program
SAWPA solely permits the Waste Haulers allowing for the Waste Haulers to have only one permit
to provide service to the four Member Agencies' Collection Stations. This also facilitates utilization
of the Generator's regular Waste Hauler if an Alternate Collection Station must be used. SAWPA
expects to revise its Ordinance in the next fiscal year including new language for the Waste Hauler
Program.
Existinq Permits—Permitted Waste Haulers
• Alpha Petroleum Transport (Permit No. H1126-1)
22740 Temescal Canyon Road, Corona, CA 92883
• Environmental Management Technologies, Inc. (Permit No. H1025-3)
1456 S. Gage Street, San Bernardino, CA 92408
• Giuliano & Sons Briners, Inc. (Permit No. H1031-3)
10380 Alder Avenue, Bloomington, CA 92316
• Haz Mat Trans, Inc. (Permit No. H1033-3)
230 E. Dumas Street, San Bernardino, CA 92408
• Hazardous Waste Transportation Services (Permit No. H1034-3)
10600 South Painter Avenue, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
• Hidden Villa Ranch (Permit No. H1120-2)
1811 Mountain Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
• K-VAC Environmental Services, Inc. (Permit No. H1049-3)
8910 Rochester Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
• Rayne Water Conditioning (Permit No. H1066-3.1)
939 West Reece Street, San Bernardino, CA 92411
• Western Environmental Services, Inc. (Permit No. H1098-3)
400 W. Foothill Blvd., Suite H, Glendora, CA 91740
7.23
New Permits—Permitted Waste Haulers
• Patriot Environmental Services, Inc. (Permit No. H1127-1)
508 East E Street, Wilmington, CA 90744
Permit Issued July 5, 2018
Closed Permits— Permitted Waste Haulers
• Ecology Control Industries, Inc. (Permit No. H1123-1.1)
15707 S. Main Street, Gardena, CA 90248
Permit Closed July 25, 2018
Permit closed July 25,2018 following the Waste Hauler's request to no longer be permitted.
Enforcement Action
• Hidden Villa Ranch (Permit No. H1120-1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action (NOV/OCA) was issued to Hidden
Villa Ranch (Hidden Villa) by SAWPA on August 17, 2018 for failure to provide a manifest
form to SAWPA detailing the legal disposal of a June 12, 2018 rejected load as required
by permit. Hidden Villa was required to submit a written report to SAWPA detailing the
cause of the reporting violation and the corrective action to prevent future violations by
August 27, 2018. Hidden Villa responded on August 23, 2018 detailing that rejected load
was disposed of at a secondary Hidden Villa location in Perris, CA and therefore no
manifest was generated. The corrective action plan detailed training for proper notifications
and reporting required by a rejected load as well as retraining at the Collection Station
where the load was originally rejected. Following review of the Hidden Villa submittal
SAWPA accepted the documents and subsequently the enforcement action was closed.
SAWPA shall continue to conduct unannounced inspections at Hidden Villa and conduct
monitoring at both the generator site and Collection Station to ensure compliance with all
permit requirements and SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
Waste Hauler Collection Stations
• EMWD Collection Station (Permit No. D1055-2.2)
29541 Murrieta Road, Menifee, CA 92586
SIU 40 CFR 403.5(d)
The EMWD Collection Station is located at 29541 Murrieta Road in Menifee, California.
This Collection Station provides a brine disposal location for facilities located in EMWD
service area. There are no PSES or PSNS Categorical Standards that apply except for
general compliance with 40 Part 403. This facility is currently classified as a Significant
Industrial User and therefore subject to the general and specific wastewater pollutant limits
contained in SAWPA Ordinance No. 8 and SAWPA Local Limits (Resolution No. 2017-11),
or any successors thereto. As this facility operates only as a brine disposal location and
generates no wastewater any violation recorded at the Collection Station would apply to
the Industrial Users that discharge to the Collection Station rather than the Collection
Station itself.
7.24
During this reporting period (July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019), the EMWD Collection
Station received a total flow of 16.02 MG.
As of June 30, 2019, one (1) Industrial User is permitted to haul brine wastewater to the
Collection Station.
1. Infineon Technologies Americas Corporation (Permit No. 11039-3)
• IEUA Collection Station (Permit No. D1035-3.1)
16400 El Prado Road, Chino, CA 91710
SIU 40 CFR 403.5(d)
The IEUA Collection Station is located at 16400 El Prado Road, Chino, California. This
Collection Station provides a brine disposal location for facilities in the IEUA service area.
There are no PSES or PSNS Categorical Standards that apply except for general
compliance with 40 Part 403. This facility is currently classified as a Significant Industrial
User and therefore subject to the general and specific wastewater pollutant limits contained
in SAWPA Ordinance No. 8 and SAWPA Local Limits (Resolution No. 2017-11), or any
successors thereto. As this facility operates only as a brine disposal location and
generates no wastewater any violation recorded at the Collection Station would apply to
the Industrial Users that discharge to the Collection Station rather than the Collection
Station itself.
During this reporting period (July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019), the IEUA Collection
Station received a total flow of 2.79 MG.
As of June 30, 2019, five (5) Industrial Users are permitted to haul brine wastewater to the
Collection Station.
1. C.C. Graber Co. (Permit No. 11005-2.1)
2. Eastside Water Treatment Plant(Permit No. 11024-2.1)
3. Niagara Bottling, LLC (Permit No. 11114-1.1)
4. San Antonio Regional Hospital (Permit No. 11096-2.1)
5. ShawCor Pipe Protection, LLC (Permit No. 11077-2.1)
• SBMWD Collection Station (Permit No. D1076-3.1)
399 Chandler Place, San Bernardino, CA 92408
SIU 40 CFR 403.5(d)
Valley District's Collection Station is located at the City of San Bernardino's Water
Reclamation Plant Brine Line connection. This Collection Station provides a brine disposal
location for facilities in the Valley District service area. There are no PSES or PSNS
Categorical Standards that apply except for general compliance with 40 Part 403. This
facility is currently classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore subject to the
general and specific wastewater pollutant limits contained in SAWPA Ordinance No. 8 and
SAWPA Local Limits (Resolution No. 2017-11), or any successors thereto. As this facility
operates only as a brine disposal location and generates no wastewater any violation
recorded at the Collection Station would apply to the Industrial Users that discharge to the
Collection Station rather than the Collection Station itself.
7.25
During this reporting period (July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019), the SBMWD Collection
Station received a total flow of 10.42 MG.
As of June 30, 2019, six (6) Industrial Users are permitted to haul brine wastewater to the
Collection Station.
1. Angelica Textile Services (Permit No. 11003-3.1)
2. Farmdale Creamery (Permit No. 11026-2.1)
3. Loma Linda University Power Plant(Permit No. 11051-2.1)
4. Loma Linda Veterans Medical Center(Permit No. 11052-3.1)
5. Niagara Bottling, LLC (Permit No. 11111-1.2)
6. Rayne Water Conditioning (Permit No. 11066-2.1)
• WMWD Collection Station (Permit No. D1087-3.1)
2205 Railroad Street, Corona, CA 92880
SIU 40 CFR 403.5(d)
WMWD's Brine Line Collection Station is located at the City of Corona's WRF No. 1 at
2205 Railroad Street. This Brine Line Collection Station provides a brine disposal location
for facilities in WMWD's service area. There are no PSES or PSNS Categorical Standards
that apply except for general compliance with 40 Part 403. This facility is currently
classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore subject to the general and specific
wastewater pollutant limits contained in SAWPA Ordinance No. 8 and SAWPA Local Limits
(Resolution No. 2017-11), or any successors thereto. As this facility operates only as a
brine disposal location and generates no wastewater any violation recorded at the
Collection Station would apply to the Industrial Users that discharge to the Collection
Station rather than the Collection Station itself.
During this reporting period (July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019), the total flow to the Brine
Line was 2.88 MG.
As of June 30, 2019, nine(9) Industrial Users are permitted to haul wastewater to the Brine
Line Collection Station.
1. Corona Regional Medical Center(Permit No. 11016-3.1)
2. Decra Roofing, Inc. (Permit No. 11020-3)
3. Giuliano & Sons Briners, Inc. (Permit No. 11031-2.1)
4. Hidden Villa Ranch (Permit No. 11121-1.1)
5. La Sierra University(Permit No. 11050-3.1)
6. Prudential Overall Supply(Permit No. 11062-3)
7. Qualified Mobile, Inc. (Permit No. 11064-4)
8. Saratoga Food Specialties (Permit No. 11128-1)
9. Sierra Aluminum Company, Inc. (Permit No. 11078-4)
7.4.2.7 Western Municipal Water District (WMWD)
Description of WMWD
WMWD is a Municipal Water District responsible for the implementation of certain pretreatment
program activities for the direct and indirect industries connected to the Brine Line within its service
area. WMWD was formed in 1954 under the Municipal Water District Act of 1911 for the purpose
of bringing supplemental water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to a
7.26
growing western Riverside County. Western's service area covers 527 square miles, serving a
population of approximately 900,000 people. The District serves 10 wholesale customers with
imported water via the Colorado River and the State Water Project. WMWD also supplies
imported water and groundwater directly to approximately 25,000 residential, commercial and
agricultural customers in the areas of El Sobrante, Eagle Valley, Temescal Creek, Woodcrest,
Orangecrest, Mission Grove, Lake Mathews, March Air Reserve Base, Rainbow Canyon and
portions of the cities of Riverside and Murrieta. The Murrieta division provides water and
wastewater services in a 6.5-square mile portion of Murrieta and relies on both groundwater and
imported sources. WMWD headquarters is located in Riverside, California and serves the western
Riverside County portion of the watershed, as well as portions of the Santa Margarita Watershed,
south of the Santa Ana River Watershed.
Enforcement Action
• La Sierra University (Permit No. 11050-3.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action (NOV/OCA) was issued to La Sierra
University (La Sierra) by WMWD on March 12, 2019 for submittal of a late Self-Monitoring
Report(SMR). On February 27, 2019 the permittee submitted the required January SMR
a violation of the February 7, 2019 required submittal date. This is the second consecutive
late SMR submittal. The permittee was previously issued a Written Warning for the first
late submittal. The NOV/OCA required the permittee to investigate the cause of the
violation and submit a written report detailing the findings of the investigation and submit a
corrective action plan to bring the facility into consistent compliance. The permittee
provided the required response on March 19, 2019 and detailed that the contract laboratory
had collected the sample automatically without informing the permittee they were onsite to
collect the sample. Further, the laboratory did not submit the results of the analysis to the
permittee until after the required submittal date, which is when the permittee first
discovered that a sample had been collected. The permittee detailed a corrective action
plan that consisted of removing the automatic sample collection option with their contract
laboratory to prevent further errors of this type from occurring again. Rather, each sample
event will be scheduled with the contract laboratory by the permittee to ensure reports are
submitted in a timely manner. Institution of the corrective actions identified above indicated
compliance; subsequently, the enforcement action was closed. WMWD shall continue to
conduct unannounced inspections and wastewater monitoring at La Sierra to ensure
consistent compliance with permit requirements and SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
• Giuliano &Sons Briners, Inc. (Permit No. 11031-2.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action (NOV/OCA)was issued to Giuliano&
Sons Briners, Inc. (Giuliano) by WMWD on July 25, 2018 following review of the self-
monitoring report submitted on June 26,2018. Review of the June 26,2018 self-monitoring
report data indicates a Copper analysis of 3.3 mg/L a violation of the Local Daily Maximum
Discharge Limitation of 3.0 mg/L and a Zinc analysis of 14.0 mg/L, a violation of the Local
Daily Maximum Discharge Limitation of 10.0 mg/L. Furthermore, as this was the only
sampling event, more than 33% of the measurements taken exceeded the product of the
daily maximum discharge limitations multiplied by the applicable Technical Review Criteria
(TRC) of 1.2 for the January 2018 through June 2018 evaluation period. Therefore,
Giuliano was determined to be in SNC for the 3rd and 4th quarter of the 2017-2018 Fiscal
7.27
Year for TRC Violations for the parameters of Copper and Zinc. Giuliano was required to
investigate the cause of the violation and submit a written report along with a Correction
Action Plan designed to bring the facility into compliance. Furthermore, Giuliano was
required to conduct sampling for Copper and Zinc for three consecutive weeks and submit
the analysis within ten days of receipt. Giuliano responded with their written report on
August 3, 2018. Giuliano attributed the possible cause of the violation to large quantities
of scrap metal on site that may have been a source for the parameter violations. In
response, Giuliano conducted a large cleanup of the facility removing any scrap metal from
the site. Giuliano has since instituted a weekly cleanup of the facility to ensure no metal
debris remains onsite that lead to any parameter violation. Review of the analysis results
of the three consecutive weeks of sampling for Copper and Zinc by Giuliano indicated
compliance. Institution of the corrective actions identified above, and follow-up sampling
indicated compliance; subsequently, the enforcement action was closed. WMWD shall
continue to conduct unannounced inspections and wastewater monitoring at Giuliano to
ensure consistent compliance with permit requirements and SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
7.4.2.8 Yucaipa Valley Water District (YVWD)
Description of YVWD
YVWD is a Water District responsible for the implementation of certain pretreatment program
activities for the industries connected to the Brine Line within its service area. Currently there are
no permitted users within the YVWD Service Area. YVWD was formed on September 14, 1971,
when the Secretary of State of the State of California certified and declared formation of the District.
The District operates under the County Water District Law, being Division 12 of the State of
California Water Code. Although the immediate function of the District at the time was to provide
water service, the YVWD currently provides a variety of services to residential, commercial and
industrial customers. The YVWD provides sewer collection and sewer treatment services. Sewer
treatment takes place at the highly advanced Wochholz Regional Water Recycling Facility that
provides advanced treatment, including the capability to demineralize the recycled water. The
demineralization process involves a reverse osmosis system that separates small molecules from
the recycled water supply. In 2012, the YVWD completed an extension of the Inland Empire Brine
Line operated by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. The brine disposal facility is critical
to insure the YVWD meets the stringent water quality objectives set by the Regional Water Quality
Control Board for the Yucaipa Management Zone, Beaumont Management Zone and the San
Timoteo Management Zone.
Although YVWD currently has no permitted industries discharging to the Brine Line they have
participated in Brine Line activities, including training conducted by SAWPA personnel, since 2013.
They conduct the industrial user survey upstream of the Henry Wochholz Regional Water Recycling
Facility that began discharge to the Brine Line in July of 2016, in accordance with SAWPA policies
and procedures. The Henry Wochholz Regional Water Recycling Facility service area includes
three industrial permittees:
• Sorensen Engineering with Permit No. CP-001-03, Class I — CIU per 40 CFR 433.17
(PSNS) Metal Finishing issued by the YVWD for a maximum flow of 20,000 gallons per
day. It should be noted that in most cases the YVWD local limits are more stringent than
the categorical limits, especially for metals and cyanide. Self-monitoring requirements are
specified by pollutant on a semi-annual basis. The Sorensen permit clearly denotes the
most stringent limits that apply.
• Skat-Trak Performance Products with Permit No. CP-003-03, Class II — Non-Significant
CIU per 40 CFR 464.15 (PSES), Subpart A, for Aluminum Casting and 40 CFR 464.35
7.28
(PSES), Subpart C, for Ferrous Casting issued by YVWD as a zero-discharge permit. The
no discharge requirement is clearly noted in the permit and the applicable categorical limit
tables are provided in the permit as informational items.
• Yucaipa Valley Regional Water Filtration Facility (YVRWFF)with Permit No. SP 001-04, is
a Class I — SIU per 40 CFR. YVRWFF is a surface water treatment facility with an initial
capacity of 12 MGD and provisions for expansion to 36MGD The water treatment includes
automatic strainers and free surface flow distribution structure, manual strainers,
microfiltration membrane system, nano-filtration membrane system, blending structure, a
membrane room, a DAF and a CIP process. The YVRWFF produces high quality potable
water.
Enforcement Action
There was no enforcement action during this reporting period.
7.4.3 Self-Monitoring Program
A self-monitoring program is required of permittees discharging to the Brine Line. The self-monitoring
reports (SMRs) are delivered to the applicable agency for review and action if required. The SMR water
quality data is included in the SAWPA Data Management System.
7.4.4 Field Inspection, Sampling, and Monitoring QA/QC
SAWPA conducts sampling QA/QC in accordance with EPA requirements including equipment blanks and
field blanks. Analysis of the QA/QC data indicated samples collected were representative and free of
contamination.
7.4.5 Identification of New Permittees
SAWPA requires a wastewater discharge permit for all facilities with discharge to the Brine Line, except for
certain areas in the JCSD and WMWD service areas, therefore new permittees are identified upon their
completion of a wastewater discharge permit application. Most new companies identified by SAWPA or
upstream agencies in areas upstream of emergency connections are discovered by field inspectors
responding to completed industrial user surveys that indicate an inspection is warranted or during
inspections of previously unoccupied warehouse and facility spaces. Facilities identified upstream of
emergency connections requiring a permit are responded to by the upstream agency with oversight by
SAWPA. These permitted facilities are listed in the emergency permit fact sheet and in the corresponding
agency's Annual Reports.
EMWD
In the EMWD service area all new proposed connections or proposed new indirect dischargers
must complete a permit application that is thoroughly reviewed by EMWD and SAWPA prior to
developing a permit. The draft permit is then reviewed and commented on by SAWPA and OCSD
before issuing a final permit.
7.29
IEUA
In the IEUA service area, IEUA collaborates with the City of Chino to identify industries that may
be subject to Federal Categorical Standards or local limits. No industries are allowed to connect
to the Brine Line until they have entered into a capacity right agreement with IEUA and obtained a
wastewater discharge permit issued by IEUA and SAWPA as required. IEUA in partnership with
the City of Chino obtains new business information from the following:
• City business licensing departments
• Industrial User Survey questionnaires
• City utility service requests
• City referrals during storm water inspections
Most new companies that could potentially connect to the Brine Line are identified by IEUA field
inspectors while out inspecting current permittees and when following up on tips provided by the
City of Chino Source Control division. Facilities identified upstream of an emergency connection
are listed in the emergency permit fact sheet and in the IEUA Annual Report.
JCSD
In the JCSD service area SAWPA checks various sources for companies that may be subject to
Federal Categorical Standards or local limits. Wastewater permits are issued by SAWPA and
JCSD as required. SAWPA or JCSD obtains new business information from the following:
• The building department and business license process
• Industrial User Survey(IUS)questionnaires are completed by new water/sewer customers,
the IUS is verified by site inspections
• Agency utility service requests and high-water users are inspected for wastewater
generating activities
• Industry, trade, or association magazines
• Internet searches &field observations
• New construction/tenant improvement—plan checks
JCSD will conduct regular inspections of all customers connected to the Inland Empire Brine Line
(Brine Line) to verify the type of wastewater generated at their location. In addition, any closed-
circuit TV (CCTV) revealing a possible illegal connection will be investigated. The majority of new
companies identified by SAWPA or upstream agencies in these scenarios are discovered by field
inspectors responding to completed industrial user surveys that indicate an inspection is warranted
or during inspections of previously unoccupied warehouse and facility spaces. A priority
determination is assigned as follows: High Priority—any non-permitted facility generating industrial
wastewater is inspected and monitored annually for local limits, Medium Priority — any dry
manufacturing facility is inspected every 2 years unless changes to manufacturing and Low Priority
— warehouse/commercial business is inspected every 5 years. Facilities identified in the JCSD
service area requiring a permit is reviewed by SAWPA with final permit concurrence by OCSD.
Facilities identified upstream of emergency connections in other jurisdictions requiring a permit are
reviewed to by the upstream agency with oversight by SAWPA. These permitted facilities are listed
in the emergency permit fact sheet and in the corresponding agency's Annual Reports.
7.30
SBMWD
In the SBMWD service area all new proposed connections or proposed new indirect dischargers
must complete a permit application that is thoroughly reviewed by SBMWD and SAWPA prior to
developing a permit. The draft permit is then reviewed and commented on by SAWPA and OCSD
before issuing a final permit.
Valley District
In the Valley District service area, all new proposed connections must complete a permit application
that is thoroughly reviewed by Valley District and SAWPA prior to developing a permit. The draft
permit is then reviewed and commented on by SAWPA and OCSD before issuing a final permit.
WMWD
In the WMWD service area,except for the areas upstream of the Corona WRF No. 1 and WRCWRA
SRPS, all new proposed connections or proposed new indirect dischargers must complete a permit
application that is thoroughly reviewed by WMWD and SAWPA prior to developing a permit. The
draft permit is then reviewed and commented on by SAWPA and OCSD before issuing a final
permit. For the Corona WRF No. 1 permit WMWD directs the City of Corona, with oversight by
SAWPA, through their industrial survey process. The City of Corona is alerted of any new business
moving into their jurisdiction through the building department and business license process. New
businesses are given a pretreatment questionnaire which is returned to the Pretreatment
Department and reviewed. Pretreatment personnel visit the site to verify the information submitted
in the questionnaire.
In the WMWD service area with potential to discharge to the Brine Line in an emergency condition
from the WRCRWA SRPS, WRCRWA checks for various sources for companies that may be
subject to Federal Categorical Standards or local limits. Wastewater permits are issued by
WRCRWA agencies as required. WRCRWA obtains new business information from the following:
• The building department and business license process
• Industrial User Survey(IUS)questionnaires are completed by new water/sewer customers,
the IUS is verified by site inspections
• Agency utility service requests and high-water users are inspected for wastewater
generating activities
• Industry, trade, or association magazines
• Internet searches &field observations
• New construction/tenant improvement—plan checks
YVWD
In the YVWD service area upstream of the Henry Wochholz Regional Water Recycling Facility,
YVWD checks various sources for companies that may be subject to Federal Categorical
Standards or local limits. Wastewater permits are issued by YVWD as required. YVWD obtains
new business information from the following:
• The building department and business license process
• Industrial User Survey(IUS)questionnaires are completed by new water/sewer customers,
the IUS is verified by site inspections
• Agency utility service requests and high-water users are inspected for wastewater
generating activities
• Industry, trade, or association magazines
7.31
• Internet searches &field observations
• New construction/tenant improvement—plan checks
7.4.6 Future Projects that will Affect Quantity of Discharge to the Brine Line
Aramark is a uniforms and apparel provider in Jurupa Valley, CA that discharges to the local Publicly
Owned Treatment Works (POTW). The POTW has recently revised their Total Dissolved Solids limitation
to a level Aramark, due to the nature of their business, is unable to feasibly meet. As of June 30, 2019,
Aramark was given a Brine Line Wastewater Discharge Permit Application at their request and it is
anticipated they will seek discharge to the Brine Line in late 2019.
California Institution for Women (CIW) which is primarily domestic (reclaimable) wastewater will be
diverted to the Pine Avenue Sewer, away from the Brine Line, when the diversion project is completed.
Diversion of the CIW wastewater to the Pine Avenue Sewer away from the Brine Line is anticipated for
Fiscal Year 2019/2020.
City of Beaumont Has completed plans and commenced construction to upgrade the City's existing
wastewater treatment plant. These plans include a salinity management strategy to comply with basin plan
objectives set by the Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Beaumont and San Timoteo
Groundwater Management Zones. The improvements are contingent on the ability to tie the discharge from
the treatment plant upgrade to the Brine Line for brine conveyance. The City of Beaumont is not within the
Brine Line Service Area, so therefore requires authorization from OCSD General Manager prior to
discharge. The City of Beaumont submitted an official request to discharge to the Brine Line in late 2016.
SAWPA requested additional information before submitting to OCSD a request for authorization for the
discharge from the City of Beaumont to the Brine Line from OCSD in early 2017. OCSD requested
additional information from the City of Beaumont and SAWPA prior to deciding on the request, which the
City of Beaumont and SAWPA has since provided. OCSD responded on October 24, 2018 identifying four
(4) requirements the City of Beaumont and SAWPA must meet in order to receive OCSD's acceptance of
the discharge from outside of the Brine Line Service Area. As of June 30, 2019, the City of Beaumont and
SAWPA have completed one(1)of these requirements and continued work on the remaining requirements.
Rialto Bioenergy is a food waste-to-energy facility in Rialto, California, which has submitted a wastewater
discharge permit application to SAWPA and Valley District. The facility is expected to come online and
begin discharge to the Brine Line sometime in 2020 following issuance of a wastewater discharge permit.
7.4.7 SAWPA Special Projects
SAWPA conducted the following Special Project efforts during the reporting period:
1. Dewatering sealed maintenance access structures, repair of corroded blind flanges, and
replacement of gaskets was conducted in Reach 4A Upper of the Brine Line.
2. Continued Inspection of Reach 4A Upper Maintenance Access Structures throughout the reporting
period.
3. Repaired damaged Air Release and Vacuum Valve (AV-0440).
4. Cleaned the Pine Avenue Siphon on Reach 4A Upper.
5. Inspected and completed condition assessment of a portion of Reach 4D. It was determined
additional assessment will be required within five years.
7.4.8 SAWPA Member and Contract Agency Ordinances and Resolutions
• SAWPA adopted Ordinance No. 8 and Local Limits Resolution 2017-11 on September 19, 2017.
7.32
• EMWD adopted EMWD Ordinance No. 91.3, incorporating the changes made for SAWPA
Ordinance No. 8 on May 2, 2018.
• IEUA adopted IEUA Ordinance No. 106, incorporating the changes made for SAWPA Ordinance
No. 8 on February 21, 2018.
• JCSD adopted the JCSD Brine Line Ordinance 423 on January 8, 2018, incorporating the changes
made for SAWPA Ordinance No. 8. JCSD adopted JCSD Brine Line Ordinance 424, incorporating
the changes made for SAWPA Resolution 2017-11 on January 22, 2018.
• SBMWD adopted SAWPA Resolution No. 2017-11 with SBMWD Resolution No. 918 on October
17, 2017. SBMWD adopted SAWPA Ordinance No. 8 with SBMWD Resolution No. 919 on October
17, 2017.
• Valley District adopted Valley District Ordinance No. 80, incorporating the changes made for
SAWPA Ordinance No. 8 on June 19, 2018.
• WMWD adopted WMWD Brine Line Ordinance No. 389, incorporating the changes made for
SAWPA Ordinance No. 8 on March 21, 2018.
• YVWD adopted SAWPA Ordinance No. 8 by Resolution on October 3, 2017. YVWD adopted
SAWPA Resolution No. 2017-11 by Resolution on February 6, 2018.
7.4.9 Public Participation
None.
7.33
7.4.10 Permittees in Significant Noncompliance (SNC)
Summary of SAWPA and Member/Contract Agency Permittees in SNC
July 1, 2018—June 30, 2019
EMWD Permittees
Company Name Permit No. Reporting or Discharge Violation
None
IEUA Permittees
Company Name Permit No. Reporting or Discharge Violation
California Institution for Women D1007-3 Discharge Violation
JCSD Permittees
Company Name Permit No. Reporting or Discharge Violation
Del Real Foods, LLC D1021-2.1 Failure to Report Pollutant Violation
SBMWD Permittees
Company Name Permit No. Reporting or Discharge Violation
None
Valley District Permittees
Company Name Permit No. Reporting or Discharge Violation
None
SAWPA Permittees
Company Name Permit No. Reporting or Discharge Violation
Inland Bioenergy, LLC D1072-3 Discharge Violation
WMWD Permittees
Company Name Permit No. Reporting or Discharge Violation
None
7.34
7.4.10.1 Summary of Permittees in SNC Newspaper Notice
• California Institution for Women (CIW) (Permit No. D1007-3)
California Institution for Women(CIW)conducted a required self-monitoring event on July 19,2018. Review
of the July 19, 2018 self-monitoring report data indicated a 1,4-Dioxane concentration of 140 mg/L, a
violation of the Local Daily Maximum Discharge Limitation of 1.0 mg/L as stated by Permit. Furthermore,
as 100% of the measurements taken exceeded the daily maximum discharge limitations for the April 2018
through December 2018 evaluation period CIW is determined to be in SNC for the fourth quarter of the
2017 — 2018 Fiscal Year and the first and second quarters of the 2018 — 2019 Fiscal Year for Chronic
Violations for the parameter of 1,4-Dioxane.
• Del Real Foods, LLC (Permit No. D1021-2.1)
Del Real Foods, LLC (Del Real) conducted a required semi-annual self-monitoring event on August 10,
2018. The reported pH from the sampling event, Lab Sample B81-11399-10 dated August 24, 2018 was 5.4
S.U. a violation of the daily minimum discharge limitation of 6.0 S.U. for the parameter of pH. Del Real did
not notify JCSD of the pH violation until January 7, 2019, 136 days after the violation. Del Real failed to
report said violation within 45 days of the required report due date placing the facility in Significant
Noncompliance for the second and third quarters of the 2018-2019 Fiscal Year.
• Inland Bioenergy, LLC (Permit No. D1072-3)
Inland Bioenergy, LLC (Inland Bioenergy) submitted January, February, and March 2019 Self-Monitoring
Reports (SMR) indicating significantly high concentrations of BOD and TSS discharged to the Brine Line.
These discharges were determined to be Slug Discharges as described by SAWPA Ordinance.
Furthermore, pursuant to the Ordinance Section 103.0 Definitions, 109, Significant Noncompliance (SNC)
D. shall mean any other violations or group of violations,which may include a violation of Best Management
Practices, which the POTW or SAWPA determines will adversely affect the operation and implementation
of SAWPA's Pretreatment Program or the Brine Line or tributaries thereto. As such, Inland Bioenergy has
been determined to be in Significant Noncompliance for the third quarter of the 2018-2019 Fiscal Year.
7.4.11 Non-Industrial Source Control and Public Education Programs
EMWD supports an extensive education program designed to provide a useful academic experience at all
grade levels.
IEUA educates its permittees during site inspections when applicable for typical outreach efforts such as
FOG and hazardous waste education.
JCSD's Pretreatment staff coordinates public outreach in cooperation with JCSD's Community Affairs Staff.
The public outreach occurs in community newsletters, public outreach events such as JCSD's Open House
and Wellness Events, and JCSD's website. Topics include FOG Control, root control, hazardous waste
disposal and Sewer System Management Plan components. Information is provided to the dischargers
during the permit renewal process and site inspections.
SBMWD implements a number of outreach programs to educate industry and to minimize pollutants
discharged. Field inspectors provide Best Management Practice (BMP) brochures during site inspections
7.35
to educate industry and minimize the discharge of pollutants. SBMWD operates a quarterly Silver Waste
Disposal Program to provide a disposal site for small quantity silver generators within the service area.
Valley District provides public educational information to their customers to encourage the efficient use of
water through advertising, classroom instruction, contests, paying 25% of retail water agency rebates, etc.
In collaboration with its retail water agencies, iEfficient.com was created, which provides water-saving tips
and information on water issues. Valley District conducts regular Board Meetings which are open to the
public on the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of each Month. Valley District also provides public information via their
website at http://www.sbvmwd.com/ which includes scheduled events and other opportunities for public
participation on a variety of issues.
WMWD provides public educational information to their customers to encourage the efficient use of water
through advertising, rebates, programs, and workshops.
7.4.12 Other Public Participation
SAWPA Agency Dental Amalgam Programs
Eastern Municipal Water District(EMWD)
EMWD has no areas of discharge to the Brine Line which have dental facilities.
Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA)
IEUA has no direct connections from dental facilities within their jurisdiction. In the IEUA jurisdiction area
there in one Emergency Permit with an area that has dental facilities that can discharge to the Brine Line
in the event of an emergency, the IEUA Los Serranos area. As of June 30, 2019, IEUA has completed the
inventory of dentists that discharge from the Los Serranos area. IEUA sent the one-time compliance report
survey to these dentists and are in the process of reviewing the reports that have been submitted.
Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD)
JCSD has no dental facilities from the areas with direct connections to the Brine Line. In the JCSD
jurisdiction area there are various Emergency Permits that have dental facilities that can discharge to the
Brine Line in the event of an emergency. As of June 30, 2019, JCSD has issued surveys to all dental
facilities that discharge within the Emergency Permitted service area. All open facilities have submitted
their one-time compliance report(OTCR) and have been inspected to verify compliance.
San Bernardino Municipal Water Department (SBMWD)
SBMWD has no direct connections from dental facilities within their jurisdiction. In the SBMWD jurisdiction
area there in one Emergency Permit with an area that has dental facilities that can discharge to the Brine
Line in the event of an emergency, the SBMWD WRP. As of June 30, 2019, SBMWD has issued surveys
to all dental facilities that discharge within this area that may discharge to the Brine Line in the event of an
emergency. SBMWD is awaiting full submittal of the issued surveys to develop a plan for implementation
of the DIU regulations.
San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (Valley District)
Valley District has no areas of discharge to the Brine Line which have dental facilities.
7.36
Western Municipal Water District(WMWD)
WMWD has no direct connections from dental facilities within their jurisdiction. In the WMWD jurisdiction
area there are two Emergency Permits with areas that have dental facilities that can discharge to the Brine
Line in the event of an emergency:
• Corona WRF No. 1
As of June 30, 2019, the City of Corona has issued surveys to all dental facilities that discharge to
the Corona WRF No. 1 and have received those surveys back from the dental facilities. Corona is
now in the process of follow-up inspections and compiling missing information as necessary.
• WRCRWA SRPS
WRCRWA has three agency jurisdictions that discharge to the WRCRWA SRPS: WMWD, Home
Gardens, and City of Norco. The WMWD area is residential and no dental facilities have been
identified. As of June 30, 2019, Home Gardens has issued surveys to all dental facilities that
discharge to the WRCRWA SRPS from within their jurisdiction and are awaiting all to be returned.
As of June 30, 2019, the City of Norco has identified all the dental facilities that discharge to the
WRCRWA SRPS from within their jurisdiction and has issued surveys to these facilities.
Yucaipa Valley Water District(YVWD)
YVWD has no direct connections from dental facilities within their jurisdiction. YVWD has one permit,
issued by SAWPA, for the Henry Wochholz Water Reclamation Facility that discharges Brine Wastewater
from a reclamation process for the wastewater treatment plant. As of June 30, 2019, for the area that
discharges to the YVWD Henry Wochholz Water Reclamation Facility YVWD is in the process of issuing
surveys to all dental facilities and have received approximately three-quarters of those back at this time.
YVWD will be visiting the dental offices that have not returned their surveys during the next area survey.
7.4.13 Changes to the SAWPA Pretreatment Program
SAWPA has continued to refine a new Pretreatment Program developed in 2013. SAWPA staff consists
of a Manager of Permitting and Pretreatment and a Senior Pretreatment Program Specialist, with an
additional 1.6 full-time equivalent consisting of other SAWPA personnel. SAWPA oversees the Brine Line
program with assistance from Pretreatment Program managers, senior management, and inspectors from
the Member and Contract Agencies. A full description of personnel available to the Brine Line program is
detailed in 7.4.14.
Two working groups made up of 1) Pretreatment Program managers; and 2) managers and senior
management met during the year to coordinate work of the Pretreatment Program team. Working group
meetings are utilized to review Brine Line procedures, discuss upcoming pretreatment issues, and provide
training on various topics related to the program. SAWPA continued an Inter-Agency training program to
promote the continued growth of all agency inspectors. Inspectors from each agency accompany a different
agency on an inspection each quarter to observe inspection practices, but also see new types of facilities,
broadening each inspector's experience.
SAWPA conducted covert downstream monitoring of dischargers where concerns of potential non-
compliance issues were present. Although to date no non-compliance issues have been discovered due
to this sampling, SAWPA will continue the practice in FY 2019/20.
7.37
SAWPA conducted audits of its member/Contract Agencies in late 2018 and early 2019. During these
audits SAWPA personnel ensure agencies were performing inspection, monitoring, permitting, and
enforcement activities in line with the SAWPA policies and procedures. SAWPA personnel reviewed
documentation for completeness, accuracy, and adherence to SAWPA policies and consistency between
agency programs. SAWPA personnel also accompanied agency personnel on inspection and sampling
events to observe techniques and ensure adherence to SAWPA procedures and consistency between
agency programs. SAWPA observed no major findings at any of the member or Contract Agencies.
SAWPA Draft Pretreatment Program Control Documents Submittal
SAWPA Submitted draft updates to the Pretreatment Program Control Documents (PPCDs), also known
as the SAWPA Policy and Procedures, for OCSD's review on April 2, 2018. These documents have been
updated to incorporate OCSD's outstanding comments from their 2013 review of the PPCDs,to incorporate
changes due to SAWPA Ordinance No. 8 and Local Limits Resolution 2017-11, as well as to incorporate
any program changes SAWPA has made since 2013. In addition, SAWPA utilized this submission to
continue discussions with OCSD on four items; Permit Durations, a Collection Station MOU, the SAWPA
Stormwater Policy, and Permit Templates.
SAWPA has engaged OCSD regarding a potential Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)for operation of
the Brine Line Collection Stations (Collection Stations)as an alternative for a wastewater discharge permit.
As discussed previously the Collection Station is not generating wastewater and is instead merely a
conveyance point for the wastewater discharge. As such, a permit is not an ideal control mechanism for
their operation. SAWPA's intent was to employ a MOU with a corresponding Standard Operating Procedure
(SOP) to ensure consistent operation of each Collection Station in accordance with the SAWPA Policies
and Procedures. SAWPA had previously shared the draft Collection Station MOU with OCSD. SAWPA
understands that OCSD wished to withhold any potential concurrence on this document until a template
SOP for the Collection Stations could be reviewed. These documents were submitted alongside the Draft
Pretreatment Program Control Documents submittal on April 2, 2018.
SAWPA has engaged OCSD regarding a potential Stormwater Policy based on the OCSD Business
Washpad Rule. SAWPA's intent was to employ the Policy requiring a SOP for facilities that had potential
to discharge stormwater as outlined in the draft Policy. SAWPA has previously shared the draft Stormwater
Policy with OCSD. SAWPA understands that OCSD wished to withhold any potential concurrence on this
document until a template SOP for the Stormwater Policy could be reviewed. These documents were
submitted alongside the Draft Pretreatment Program Control Documents submittal on April 2, 2018.
SAWPA has also discussed with OCSD the submittal of a new Permit Template for each of SAWPA's permit
types for OCSD concurrence. It is SAWPA's goal to gain concurrence from OCSD on each of our individual
permit templates. This should allow for a more streamlined concurrence process for each permit as the
OCSD review can focus only on the unique language for the individual permittee rather than the standard
language, format, etc. within each template. SAWPA submitted a new draft Liquid Waste Hauler Permit
Template to OCSD on December 4, 2017. As discussed in the December 4, 2017 submittal SAWPA is
continuing to withhold submitting additional templates to OCSD for review until we have received
comments, if any, on the Liquid Waste Hauler Permit template. As the structure and content of each
template is similar, SAWPA will incorporate changes necessary to all templates prior to sending them on
for concurrence and receiving the same comments again. In a letter dated February 15, 2019 OCSD
responded to the December 4, 2017 submittal stating OCSD would not work on that template with SAWPA
at this time. SAWPA has since commenced work on preparing alternative Permit Templates for submittal
to OCSD in the following reporting period.
7.38
In a letter dated February 15, 2019 OCSD responded to the April 2, 2018 Draft Pretreatment Program
Control Documents submittal with submittal review comments. As of June 30, 2019, SAWPA is awaiting to
meet with OCSD to review these comments in more detail.
7.4.14 Pretreatment Program Budget
Staffing— EMWD
As of June 30, 2019,the Pretreatment Program staff consisted of 1 manager,2 analysts, 1 senior inspector,
6 field inspectors, and 1 administrative support personnel for a total of 11 staff members. Traditionally,
EMWD designates 20% of the departmental budget to the Brine Line Pretreatment Program. The total
estimated budget for Brine Line FY 2018/19 was $329,700.
Staffing—IEUA
As of June 30, 2019, the Pretreatment Program staff consists of 1 manager, 1 supervisor, 1 engineer, 4
field inspectors, and 1 administrative support personnel for a total of 8 staff members. The total estimated
budget for FY 2018/19 was $185,880. This represents the total estimated budget dedicated to Brine Line
activities.
Staffing—JCSD
As of June 30, 2019,the Pretreatment Program staff consists of 1 supervisor, 2 field inspectors and a sewer
sample technician for a total of 4 staff members. The JCSD Pretreatment Budget for FY 2018/19 was
$313,543 for the Brine Line Service Area. The Agency does not differentiate within its budget between
Brine Line and non-Brine Line activities.
Staffing—SBMWD
As of June 30, 2019, the Pretreatment Program staff consists of 1 manager, 2 field technicians, 1 collection
station operator, and 1 administrative support personnel for a total of 5 staff members. Total budget for the
entire Pretreatment Program including the brine program for 2018/19 for staff and equipment was$707,014.
The Agency does not differentiate within its budget between Brine Line and non-Brine Line activities.
Staffing—VaIIeV District
As of June 30, 2019, the Pretreatment Program staff consists of 1 manager and 2 consultant provided
personnel for a total of 3 staff members. The consulting budget for FY 2018/19 was$24,056. Valley District
management time is estimated at approximately 10%of the program implementation budget, or$2,405.60.
The Agency does not track time to differentiate between Brine Line and non-Brine Line activities.
Pretreatment Program sampling and monitoring costs are under a separate contract with Western Municipal
Water District (WMWD) in the amount of about $13,000. Total cost for FY 2018/19 was approximately
$28,441.
Staffing—SAWPA
As of June 30, 2019,the Pretreatment Program staff consisted of 1 manager and 1 specialist. An additional
1.6 FTE is contributed from 2 engineers, and 3 technical support personnel. The actual Brine Line activity
expenditures for FY 2018/19 were $1,079,201.
7.39
Staffing—WMWD
As of June 30, 2019, the Pretreatment Program staff consists of 1 manager, and 2 Source Control
Specialists for a total of 3 staff members. Estimated budget for FY 2018/19 was $300,000 (this figure does
not include sampling costs, which are assigned to the customer as a pass-through charge). The District
does not differentiate within its budget between Brine Line and non-Brine Line activities.
7.4.15 Equipment Inventory Listing
The Summary of Pretreatment Equipment used by and available to SAWPA in Pretreatment Activities, such
as field inspection and sampling activities, is provided in the following table. The quantities listed in each
Member and Contract Agency column below represents the total resources available for Brine Line
activities. The Member and Contract Agencies do not track time to differentiate between Brine Line and
non-Brine Line activities or resource allocations. A summary of the pretreatment equipment used by the
dischargers is shown in Appendix H titled "SAWPA Pretreatment Program Permittees with Pretreatment
Equipment".
TABLE 7.4 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority—Summary of Pretreatment Equipment
for Fiscal Year 2018/19
Equipment Quantity
Description EMWD IEUA JCSD SBMWD SAWPA WMWD
Vehicles 7 4 4 3 2 8
Automated Samplers 11 16 8 16 6* 14*
Handheld Portable 5
Samplers
Sampler Batteries 24 19 24 6 8
Sampler Battery 12 12 2 1 2
Chargers
Sampler Batter Power 1
Packs
Portable Area/Velocity 5 6 1
Flow Meters
Gas Meters/Detectors 6 4 2 2
with Pumps
Laboratory Dishwashers 1 1
Ice Machines 1 2
Portable pH Meters 8 4 4 7
Sulfide Test Kits 7
SONDE Trunk Line 4
Monitoring Devices
Laptop Computers 4 1
Continuous H2S Trunk 2
Line Monitoring Devices
Spill Response Kits 3
*NOTE: Samplers listed under SAWPA are employed directly by SAWPA personnel. A portion of the
samplers listed under WMWD were purchased by SAWPA for use by WMWD personnel for sampling
conducted on SAWPA's behalf at non-WMWD locations.
7.40
7.4.16 SAWPA Pretreatment Program Training
SAWPA, EMWD, IEUA, WMWD, SBMWD, Valley District, and JCSD staff attended training classes and
workshops presented by the California Water Environment Association (CWEA), including the P3S
conference, and Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works (SCAP) pretreatment
committee meetings.
Inter-Agency training was conducted each quarter throughout the 2018/2019 fiscal year to promote the
continued growth of all agency inspectors. Inspectors from each agency accompany a different agency on
an inspection each quarter to observe inspection practices, but also see new types of facilities, broadening
each inspector's experience.
Additional training was conducted throughout the 2018/2019 fiscal year by SAWPA for member/Contract
Agencies. The following training classes were conducted with all SAWPA agencies represented:
• SAWPA Agency Guidance for iPACS Pollutant Data Entry Training —July 19, 2018
• SAWPA Agency IPACS Nomenclature Training— December 20, 2018
• SAWPA Agency OERP Refresher Training— February 12, 2019
• SAWPA New Grease Interceptors Review Training — February 21, 2019
• SAWPA Cannabis Facility Tour Review Training —April 18, 2019
• SAWPA Brine Line Overview Training —May 16, 2019
7.41
chapter 8
SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Introduction
Biosolids Quality
chapter 8
SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
8.1 INTRODUCTION
This section provides an overview of OCSD's Biosolids Program, focusing on the biosolids quality with
respect to metals. Biosolids are nutrient-rich, treated organic matter recovered through the treatment of
wastewater. These solids are considered a resource because of their nutrient and energy values, and
they are recyclable in part because of their low metal content. The pretreatment program is a key
element in ensuring the recyclability of OCSD's biosolids by minimizing the discharge of heavy metals
and other undesirable constituents into the collection system and ultimately the treated solids,which are
used to fertilize farms.
OCSD's annual biosolids compliance report was completed, submitted to regulators, and posted online
in February. Visit OCSD.com/503 to access the most recent document that contains Biosolids Program
information, regulations, quantities, policies, guiding principles, and how and where biosolids are
recycled.
8.2 BIOSOLIDS QUALITY
Biosolids quality plays an important role in ensuring the continued recyclability of OCSD's biosolids.
OCSD's pretreatment program has been extremely effective in reducing and maintaining levels of
pollutants (e.g., OCSD's influent sewage meets drinking water standards for the biosolids monitoring
metals). The ceiling concentrations and EQ (exceptional quality) concentrations promulgated by the
EPA's biosolids regulations (40 CFR 503) are presented in the figures as a reference. For FY 2018/19,
OCSD biosolids met the EQ limits for all the regulated parameters.
TABLE 8.1 Trends in Trace Metal Content of Biosolids, Fiscal Years 2010-2019
(Concentration in mg/kg, dry weight)
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg Min. Max Avg.
Arsenic 41
2009-10 2.0 10 5.2 4.4 10 7.2
2010-11 7.2 9.7 8.4 8.6 12 10
2011-12 2.3 11 7.4 6.6 66 22
2012-13 0 7.8 4.7 2.0 10 7.0
2013-14* 3.5 9.5 5.8 5.4 11 8.4
2014-15 4.5 11 7.2 7.8 12 9.3
2015-16* 6.3 12 8.3 6.2 12 9.2
2016-17* 6.7 12 8.1 5.6 12 8.6
2017-18* 7.2 16 9.9 7.9 16 11
2018-19* 7.3 23.5 16 9.4 23.5 18
8.1
TABLE 8.1 Trends in Trace Metal Content of Biosolids, Fiscal Years 2010-2019
(Concentration in mg/kg, dry weight)
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Cadmium 39
2009-10 1.1 4.4 2.9 1.0 4.8 2.8
2010-11 1.2 3.8 2.6 1.4 5.0 2.5
2011-12 0.8 6.0 3.8 1.1 4.4 3.6
2012-13 2.6 7.8 4.7 1.9 4.4 3.1
2013-14* 1.6 11 3.9 2.1 6.0 3.5
2014-15 2.7 7.8 5.1 3.1 5.8 4.0
2015-16* 1.3 4.7 2.5 2.0 4.5 3.0
2016-17 2.6 3.1 2.3 2.0 3.8 3.0
2017-18* 1.7 4.4 3.0 2.5 7.7 5.1
2018-19* 1.2 3.0 1.6 2.7 8.4 4.2
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Chromium **
2009-10 29 56 44 30 54 47
2010-11 41 58 47 50 66 59
2011-12 42 74 52 40 70 56
2012-13 42 56 49 42 59 49
2013-14 39 52 45 40 53 46
2014-15 30 51 40 34 70 46
2015-16 31 89 46 28 60 46
2016-17 30 89 49 29 67 46
2017-18 27 38 34 38 54 44
2018-19 29 58 39 32 53 45
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Copper 1,500
2009-10 420 620 540 370 560 500
2010-11 520 600 570 500 720 570
2011-12 430 670 520 380 720 520
2012-13 480 640 540 500 640 540
2013-14 460 540 510 470 540 500
2014-15 320 570 470 320 560 470
2015-16 380 560 460 340 570 480
2016-17 400 560 460 340 570 490
2017-18 320 500 420 380 590 460
2018-19 355 600 470 335 665 510
8.2
TABLE 8.1 Trends in Trace Metal Content of Biosolids, Fiscal Years 2010-2019
(Concentration in mg/kg, dry weight)
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Lead 300
2009-10 9.0 44 23 9.0 20 17
2010-11 21 24 23 9.0 30 20
2011-12 ND 25 9.0 ND 32 13
2012-13 7.5 19 15 7.5 17 14
2013-14* 13 17.5 14 13 17 14
2014-15* 8.7 15 13 9.0 17 13
2015-16* 8.3 20 12 8.0 17 13
2016-17* 7.9 20 11 7.5 17 12
2017-18* 8.9 19 12 10 16 13
2018-19 9.9 15 12 10.4 15 13
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Mercury 17
2009-10 1.0 3.2 1.4 0.9 1.6 1.3
2010-11 0.8 2.2 1.3 0.8 2.3 1.2
2011-12 0.8 1.4 1.2 0.8 2.6 1.3
2012-13 0.7 4.1 1.5 0.8 3.8 1.4
2013-14 0.8 1.2 1.0 0.7 2.8 1.4
2014-15 1.0 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.5 1.0
2015-16 0.6 1.7 0.93 0.64 1.2 1.0
2016-17 0.53 1.7 0.90 0.70 1.2 0.90
2017-18 0.66 1.1 0.85 0.34 1.1 0.79
2018-19 0.6 1.1 0.86 0.6 1.0 0.77
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Molybdenum **
2008-09 12 16 15 8.0 16 14
2009-10 6.0 16 13 6.0 14 10
2010-11 12 19 15 4.8 18 14
2011-12 6.5 18 13 12 20 17
2012-13 9.8 20 14 12 20 15
2013-14 12 18 15 14 18 15
2014-15 9.4 18 15 12 20 16
2015-16* 11 18 15 11 23 16
2016-17 12 18 15 11 23 16
2017-18* 10 16 14 13 18 15
2018-19 13 20 16 15 22 18
8.3
TABLE 8.1 Trends in Trace Metal Content of Biosolids, Fiscal Years 2010-2019
(Concentration in mg/kg, dry weight)
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Nickel 420
2009-10 12 36 28 9 27 21
2010-11 28 46 37 14 38 32
2011-12 15 48 35 20 39 31
2012-13 34 48 40 23 41 30
2013-14 36 55 43 28 56 37
2014-15 26 47 37 26 41 34
2015-16* 29 45 38 20 41 33
2016-17 25 45 36 21 41 32
2017-18 28 37 32 31 39 34
2018-19 23 44 33 29 44 37
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Selenium 100
2009-10 2.7 18 7.3 2.8 16 5.6
2010-11 2.8 26 11 3.7 26 9.8
2011-12 ND 26 9.0 ND 19 9.0
2012-13 0 20 9.0 0 20 8.0
2013-14* 3.5 13 7.9 4.2 13 8.3
2014-15* 4.1 13 7.1 4.5 15 7.3
2015-16* 4.4 11 8.1 3.7 10 7.6
2016-17* 4.1 10 8.4 4.8 10 8.0
2017-18* 3.0 7.8 4.9 2.7 8.0 4.9
2018-19* 2.5 48 6.6 2.3 2.9 2.7
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Silver **
2009-10 10 18 15 7.4 13 10
2010-11 10 17 13 5.2 12 9.6
2011-12 7 14 10 4.0 12 8.5
2012-13 6.2 14 8.6 6.4 13 8.6
2013-14* 2.9 7.6 5.3 3.6 9.1 6.3
2014-15* 3.3 7.8 5.8 3.4 8.6 6.5
2015-16* 2.4 7.7 5.6 2.5 7.9 5.6
2016-17* 2.7 5.6 4.4 2.5 6.8 4.9
2017-18* 3.2 5.1 3.9 3.7 5 4.2
2018-19* 2.9 5.1 4.0 3.5 5.8 4.3
8.4
TABLE 8.1 Trends in Trace Metal Content of Biosolids, Fiscal Years 2010-2019
(Concentration in mg/kg, dry weight)
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Zinc 2,800
2009-10 560 810 740 520 790 710
2010-11 630 740 700 700 830 740
2011-12 560 880 710 560 910 750
2012-13 640 860 720 680 880 770
2013-14 590 730 670 620 750 700
2014-15 420 720 620 470 740 670
2015-16 500 770 620 520 890 730
2016-17 550 770 610 520 890 740
2017-18 470 680 600 590 910 720
11 2018-19 515 805 604 500 790 720
*Calculations included data below the reporting limit, but above the method detection limit, and were
therefore flagged as "detected not quantified" or the method detection limit was substituted for non-
detect values.
**EPA's extensive health risk analysis determined that no limits were needed for these metals (EPA
40CFR 503).
8.5
so
Arsenic
-Plant No.1 -Plant No 2 ----•Lmd
s0 Exceptional Oualay EPA Biosol as P. ,ta l t
39 mykq(Feb.1993).
41 nVk9(1998)
40
n)
9
1 30
k
9
20
10
0
1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
Figure 8-1 Trends in Concentrations of Arsenic in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1994-2019
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
45
Cadmium
40
35
30
m
9 25
k
9 20
i
15
10
5
0
1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
Figure 8-2 Trends in Concentrations of Cadmium in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1994-2019
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
8.6
750
Chromium
—Plant No.1 —Plant No.2
There are no biosolids limits for chromium
600
m 450
9
k
9
300
150
0
1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
Figure 8-3 Trends in Concentrations of Chromium in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1994-2019
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
2000
Copper
—Plant No —Plant No -----L-1
1800
Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant Concentration
Limit
1600 1500 mykg(Feb.1993)
-------------------------------------
1400
1200
m
9
1000
k
9
800
600
400
200
0
1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
Figure 8-4 Trends in Concentrations of Copper in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1994-2019
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
8.7
500
Lead
-Plant No -Plant No.2 -----Limit
Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant
400 Concentration Limit
300mgtkg(Feb.1993)
m
300 ---------------------------------
9
I
k
9
200
100
0
1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
Figure 8-5 Trends in Concentrations of Lead in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1994-2019
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
40
Mercury
-Plant No.tPlant No.2 -----Lmlt
35
Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant Concentration
Limit
17 nplkg(Feb.1993)
30
25
m
9
I 20
k
9
15
10
5
0
1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
Figure 8-6 Trends in Concentrations of Mercury in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1994-2019
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
8.8
80
Molybdenum
"_______________________________ —Plant No —Plant No.2 -------Ceiing
70
No Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant Concentration Limit
60 Ceiling Concentration 75 mg/kg(Feb.1993)
50
m
9
I 40
k
9
30
20
10
0
1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
Figure 8-7 Trends in Concentrations of Molybdenum in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1994-2019
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
450
Nickel
____________________________ —Plant No.1 —Plant No.2 -------Lmit
400
Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant Concentration
Limit and Ceiling Limit
350 420 mykg(Feb.1993)
300
m
9 250
k
9 200
150
100
50
0
1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
Figure 8-8 Trends in Concentrations of Nickel in Biosolids, Fiscal Years, 1994-2019
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
8.9
110
Selenium
Plant No.1 —Plant No.2 -----L ,t
100 ---------------------------------
Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant
90 Concentration Limit S Ceiling Concentration 100 mgAg
80
70
m
9 Bo
I
k
50
9
40
30
20
10
0
1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
Figure 8-9 Trends in Concentrations of Selenium in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1994-2019
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
4000
Zinc
—Plant No.1 —Plant No.2 -----Lim 9
3500
Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant Concentration Limit
2800 Exceptional
(Feb.1993)
3000
2500
m
9
k 2000
9
1500
1000
500
0
1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019
Figure 8-10 Trends in Concentrations of Zinc in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1994-2019
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
8.10
chapter 9
NON-INDUSTRIAL SOURCE CONTROL (NISC)
PROGRAM AND PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAMS
Introduction
Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) Control Programs
Radiator Shops
Dry Cleaners
Urban Runoff
Dental Amalgam
Public Education
chapter 9
NON-INDUSTRIAL SOURCE CONTROL AND PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAMS
9.1 INTRODUCTION
In response to regulatory requirements in support of water reuse through the Orange County Sanitation District's
(OCSD) partnership with the Orange County Water District(OCWD)for the Groundwater Replenishment System
(GWRS), as well as concerns regarding pollutants which pose potential impacts to OCSD's collection system,
treatment works, personnel, biosolids, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) discharge, or
which aid diversion of Urban Runoff to OCSD's treatment facilities,OCSD's Pretreatment Program was expanded to
include non-industrial sources. The non-industrial programs are listed in Table 9.1.
TABLE 9.1 Non-Industrial Programs, FY 2018/19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Programs
Fats, Oils, and Grease Control
Radiator Shops
Dry Cleaners
Urban Runoff
Dental Amalgam
9.2 FATS, OILS, AND GREASE (FOG) CONTROL PROGRAMS
9.2.1 Fats, Oils, and Grease Control
Background
A frequent cause of Sanitary Sewer Overflows(SSOs)is grease accumulation in the small-to medium-sized sewer
lines typically owned and operated by cities and local sewering agencies. In April 2002, the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region (RWQCB) issued Order No. R8-2002-0014, General Waste
Discharge Requirements(WDR),which required Orange County cities and sewering agencies,known as WDR Co-
Permittees,to monitor and control SSOs. Specifically,the order required WDR Co-Permittees to develop a Sewer
System Management Plan (SSMP), one element of which was a Fats, Oils, and Grease Control Program (FOG
program). On November 17,2004, OCSD passed FOG Ordinance No. OCSD-25 establishing the legal authority
to prohibit food service establishments(FSEs)from discharging FOG to the sewer system. OCSD implemented its
FOG program for FSEs in its direct service area starting January 1, 2005.
In May 2006, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)adopted Statewide General Waste Discharge
Requirements for Sanitary Sewer Systems,Water Quality Order No.2006-0003(Statewide WDR),which required
a similar effort statewide. In December 2006, the RWQCB rescinded its WDR in lieu of the Statewide WDR.
OCSD submitted its SSMP to the SWRCB in May 2009. OCSD completed its most recent audit of the SSMP in
May 2019. More specifics on the county-wide FOG program can be found in Chapter VIII of the SSMP. The
following sections detail OCSD's FOG control efforts in FY 2018/19.
9.1
Program Administration
The Commercial FOG program is administered through a combination of permitting, inspection, compliance
tracking, report monitoring, and enforcement. The main elements of the FOG program include:
1) Ordinance No. OCSD-25 - Fats, Oils, and Grease Ordinance for Food Service Establishments;
2) FOG Wastewater Discharge Permits to define and communicate permittees'responsibilities regarding
FOG discharges;
3) Required Best Management Practices (BMPs)to minimize FOG-bearing wastewater discharges;
4) Installation and/or required maintenance of grease interceptors (G.I.$), when applicable;
5) Semi-annual monitoring of BMP implementation and G.I. maintenance;
6) Screening and evaluation of all inspection and monitoring reports to identify violations and/or
deficiencies;
7) Inspection of FSE facilities to verify compliance; and
8) Enforcement Response Plan to respond to violations in a consistent and timely manner.
Permitting
During the initial phases of the program, OCSD conducted an examination of the FOG trouble spots, as well
as an inspection of the FSEs in the service area to collect operational information. A scheme was developed
to categorize the distinct types of facilities based upon their potential to discharge FOG,the need to enforce
the regulatory requirements of the FOG Ordinance, and the potential of each FSE to impact known or
potential trouble spots. Using the combination of inspection data and trouble spot information, FSEs were
categorized into the following six groups:
Category 1 - FSEs with a G.I. installed.
Category 2 - FSEs without a G.I. installed, that are a significant contributor to a FOG trouble spot and
probably need to install a G.I. due to their FOG impact to the sewer.
Category 3 - FSEs without a G.I. installed, that are considered a less significant contributor to a FOG
trouble spot but may still need to install a G.I. in the future due to their proximity.
Category 4- FSEs without a G.I. installed, that are not considered a significant contributor of FOG, are
not upstream of a trouble spot, and probably will not need a G.I. installed.
Category 5- FSEs found to be an insignificant source of FOG that will not be required to have a permit.
Category 6 - Commercial property owners that maintain a G.I. common to multiple FSEs.
After creating the six categories and examining the FSEs'operations and discharge configurations,it became
obvious that there needed to be different FOG Wastewater Discharge Permit(permit)alternatives to cover the
various conditions encountered. The six categories eventually produced three permit variations. The first
permit,Type 1, covers FSEs that have FOG pretreatment,typically considered to be a below-ground G.I. The
second variety, Type 2, is issued to FSEs without pretreatment, categories 2, 3, and 4. Type 2 permits
include a Conditional Waiver from the FOG pretreatment requirement, as mandated for all FSEs by OCSD's
FOG Ordinance. The third permit variation, Type 6, was developed for the strip mall or food court owners
who have several FSEs plumbed to a common G.I. The Type 6 permit only requires G.I. maintenance and
does not include any BMP requirements. The individual FSEs connected to the common interceptor at a
Type 6 location are still issued a Type 2 permit that requires BMP implementation.
Permits are currently issued for two-year terms. Prior to permit renewal,the FSE is required to complete and
submit an updated permit application and pay the permit application fee. Ownership changes also trigger a
permit re-issuance as the permit is non-transferable.
9.2
Table 9.2 reflects the current number of FSEs in OCSD's direct service area.
TABLE 9.2 FSE Count by Category, FY 2018/19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
FSEs by Category Count
Category 1 —G.I. installed 15
Category 2— No G.I. but contributing to a trouble spot 0
Category 3— No G.I. and not a significant contributor to a trouble spot 6
Category 4— Not a significant FOG source, no G.I. required at this time 18
Category 5— Insignificant FOG discharger, not permitted 18
Category 6— Property owner maintains a shared G.I. 0
Total FSEs in OCSD Program (Categories 1-6) 57
Self-Monitoring Report
As a condition of the FOG permits, FSEs are required to implement the BMPs, maintain their G.I.s if
applicable, keep records/logs of employee training and yellow grease disposal, and submit periodic self-
monitoring reports to inform OCSD of their BMP efforts and G.I. maintenance activities. Submitted reports
are evaluated and used to determine compliance.
Table 9.3 summarizes the BMP and G.I. monitoring compliance for the annual reporting period. The results
for FY 2018/2019 show 94.8%of the BMP reports being received and 96.7%of the G.I. Maintenance reports
being received. The four outstanding BMP non-submittals belonged to La Casita de L.C. (F-OR-1026), My
Pho Restaurant(F-OR-1503),and Pizza Hut#32009(F-OR-1506),and the single G.I.non-submittal belonged
to My Pho Restaurant (F-OR-1503).
TABLE 9.3 FSE Monitoring Reports, FY 2018/19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
FSEs by Category Issued Received Percent Received
BMPs Monitoring Reports 77 73 94.8%
G.I. Monitoring Reports 30 29 96.7%
Inspection
Regular FSE inspections are an integral and essential part of the FOG program, because they serve as a
regulatory reminder to implement the required BMPs, and for FSEs with G.I.s to maintain their FOG
pretreatment devices. Every inspection presents an opportunity to provide educational outreach to the FSE
community by further reinforcing the importance of the kitchen BMPs and strengthening the cooperative effort
ultimately needed to effectively control FOG discharges to the sewer. The FOG program includes two distinct
types of inspections, 1) a kitchen BMP inspection conducted by the Orange County Health Care Agency
(OCHCA), and 2) a compliance inspection conducted by OCSD staff. The verification that G.I.s are
periodically pumped out and in compliance with the 25%rule is now accomplished through the Semi-Annual
G.I. Wastehauling Report submittals. With the transfer of the local sewers to East Orange County Water
District in August 2016, the number of FOG permittees fell to 39, with 15 of those establishments having a
G.I. installed. As a result, OCSD eliminated the private contractor in lieu of OCSD compliance inspections
and OCHCA BMP Inspections.
9.3
Compliance
Violation of a permit requirement or a provision of the FOG Ordinance, or the failure to submit a required
report can lead to issuance of a Corrective Action Notice(CAN). The CAN is followed by a Notice of Violation
which includes the assessment of noncompliance fees if the deficiency is not corrected in a timely manner.
OCSD issued 12 CANs and conducted 6 follow-up inspections to resolve the non-compliance issues. Six
follow-up inspections are pending as of the end of the FY 2018/19 cycle. A total of two NOVs were issued,
Pizza Hut#32009(F-OR-1506)and Chipotle Mexican Grill#1641 (F-OR-1499),after repeated attempts failed
to resolve their self-monitoring report non-submittal issues.
Table 9.4 summarizes the BMP and G.I. inspection activity,the number of CANs issued,as well as the official
compliance and inventory management visits.
TABLE 9.4 FSE Compliance Inspection Activities, FY 2018/19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Actions Taken Count
BMPs Inspections* 37
G.I. Inspections@ 0
CANs issued* 12
Compliance Follow-Up Inspections*! 6
Notice of Violations issued* 2
OCHCA FOG Inspections- 63
Deficient BMPs/G.I. Monitoring Report Inspection* 2
Late BMPs/G.I. Monitoring Report Submittal Inspection* 0
Late Permit Application (Renewal) Submittal Inspection* 2
FSE Inventory Management Inspection* 0
Total Actions Taken 124
*Conducted by OCSD Staff
@ Conducted by Private Contractor
.Conducted by OCHCA
I Six follow-up inspections are pending for CANs issued this reporting period
FOG Program Effectiveness
Monitoring the effectiveness of the FOG program enables OCSD to refine its program implementation as
necessary to comply with its requirement to eliminate preventable SSOs. OCSD uses a geographic
information system (GIS) to analyze the relationship between trouble spots, FSEs, and SSOs. Areas of
concern are evaluated and prioritized based on the impact of FSE proximity,tributary residential density,and
FOG accumulation in the sewer line, as determined by both CCTV and field crew observations. OCSD
coordinates with the Collection Facilities staff to maintain an effective Commercial FOG program by keeping
trouble spots under surveillance and following up on grease accumulations before they reach a critical stage.
Table 9.5 summarizes the SSO data from the past two reporting periods. This data demonstrates the
effectiveness of the FOG program at reducing the frequency of SSO events.
9.4
TABLE 9.5 FOG Program Effectiveness, FY 2017/19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Spills FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19
OCSD system s ills attributable to FSE FOG 0 0
OCSD system spills attributable to residential FOG 0 0
Private lateral spills attributable to FOG 0 0
Total FOG-related Spills 0 0
9.3 RADIATOR SHOPS
The Radiator Shop Certification Program aims to prevent heavy metal-bearing liquids, oil and grease,spent
antifreeze/coolant,as well as any other hazardous wastes from being discharged to the sewer. The program
requires shops that rebuild and repair radiators to biennially certify the following:
• No industrial wastewater or spent antifreeze/coolant is discharged to the sewer,
• Floor drains are permanently sealed and secured from spills or accidental discharges,
• Water recycling systems are close-looped with no connection to the sewer, and
• Wastehauling records are maintained on-site and available for review upon request.
FY 2018/19 was a non-certification year; the next certification cycle is scheduled for October 2019. The
following paragraphs summarize the activities of the FY 2017/18 cycle.
Twenty notification letters, which contained certification forms, were mailed in October 2017. At the end of
the reporting period, 15 shops submitted certification forms. OCSD staff conducted audit inspections in
January, February, and March of 2018 to verify information in the submitted certifications. The follow-up
inspections went well, and no new owners were encountered. The inspections serve not only to check
wastehauling records and waste management practices, but also to provide an opportunity to educate the
shop owners on the OCWD GWRS and OCSD's other reclamation efforts. The personal interaction between
the shop owners and OCSD staff reinforces the concept that their facility's waste management efforts are
contributing to both high-quality drinking water, as well as a clean environment.
The four facilities that hadn't returned their certification forms,A-A Auto Service in Fullerton, Brea Brake&
Radiator in Brea,Orange County Radiator in Santa Ana,and Orange Radiator in Orange,were all determined
to be out of business (OOB). A drive-by was conducted of the industrial park where the owner of Hal's
Radiator had moved his belongings two years ago. There was still no sign of a functioning radiator repair
business,so Hal's Radiator will be placed on the OOB list,and no further follow-up is planned. No new repair
facilities were discovered since the previous certification cycle setting the current facility count at 15.
Table 9.6 summarizes FY 2017/18 certification activity.
9.5
TABLE 9.6 Radiator Shops Program, FY 2017/18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Activity Count
Notification letter/certification forms sent 20
Certifications submitted 15
Audit inspections conducted 20
Shops listed as 0013 during FY 2017/18 5*
Active shops not returning a certification 0
*A-A Auto Service(Fullerton),Brea Brake&Radiator(Brea),Orange County Radiator(Santa Ana),Orange Radiator
(Orange),and Hal's Radiator(Anaheim)
9.4 DRY CLEANERS
Initially implemented to prevent soil and groundwater contamination by perch Ioroethylene(Perc)exfiltration
from sewers, the Dry Cleaner Certification Program was revitalized as an important outreach tool to help
protect the GWRS. The program tracks the solvent usage and facility ownership within the dry cleaner
community to prevent the discharge of solvent-containing wastes from dry cleaning operations. Rather than
just examining the spent solvent disposal,additional emphasis is placed on the contaminated water from the
solvent/water separator,which is typically managed either by wastehauling off-site or by performing on-site
evaporation. The program requires dry cleaning establishments to annually certify the following:
1) No waste solvent is discharged to the sewer,
2) Dry cleaning machines and auxiliary equipment are not connected to the sewer,
3) Floor drains are secured from spills and accidental discharges,
4) Solvent waste is wastehauled off-site for disposal in accordance with all applicable laws, and
5) Solvent contaminated separator water is wastehauled and/or evaporated.
Table 9.7 summarizes the number of facilities using each of the various cleaning solvent types.
TABLE 9.7 Dry Cleaner Inventory, FY 2018/19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Type of Facilities Count
Perc Facilities 41
Hydrocarbon (Petroleum) Facilities 166
Green Earth (D5-Siloxane) Facilities 28
KTEX Facilities 2
Solvon K4 Facilities 4
Facility uses Solvon K4 and Green Earth 1
Facility uses Solvon K4 and Hydrocarbon 1
Garment collection facilities (dry cleaning equipment is still on-site)* 16
Total Facilities 259
Garment collection facilities with dry cleaning equipment on site receive a certification form to track whether the facility
reinstitutes the processing of garments.
9.6
Certifications are mailed to every dry-cleaning facility at the beginning of the annual cycle. After the
completed certifications are returned,audit inspections are conducted to verify the information. Dry cleaning
facilities must maintain their wastehauling records on site and make them available for review during
inspection. Although all active facilities and garment collection facilities with equipment on-site receive a
certification form,only Perc users are routinely inspected by OCSD. During the FY 2018/19 cycle,OCSD did
not conduct any Perc facility inspections.
There were 9 facility ownership changes reported during the FY 2018/19 certification cycle. With one new
facility added,the overall total stands at 259 including two facilities under eviction watch until their equipment
is removed permanently. At the end of the reporting period, the number of operating Perc facilities had
decreased by ten,the result of one facility going OOB,two moving to Hydrocarbon solvent,five changing to
non-operating agency status, and the two under eviction. KTEX solvent users remained steady at two,
Solvon K4 users remained at four,or six including two facilities with multiple machines and solvents. An OOB
facility accounted for one less Green Earth user. Hydrocarbon (HC) users decreased overall by three with
seven facilities going OOB,two Perc facilities moving to HC,one new HC facility added,and one changing to
non-operating agency status. The garment collection facilities,also known as agencies, increased by six as
previously operating facilities ceased using their equipment. Agency facilities are kept in the certification
program until the dry-cleaning equipment is permanently removed from the site.
Table 9.8 summarizes the dry cleaner certification and inspection activities.
TABLE 9.8 Dry Cleaner Certification Activity, FY 2018/19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Activity Count
Notification letters/certifications sent 265
Certifications submitted 260
Perc facility inspections conducted 0
Certification inspections conducted 43
Facilities listed as 0013 during FY 2018/19 9
Operating facilities failing to submit the certification 5*
*Two dry cleaning facilities that did not return certification forms were posted with eviction signs when inspected. These facilities
are not included in the 0013 total as the dry-cleaning equipment remains onsite and the businesses could eventually reopen.
Staff conducted forty-three certification inspections, representing 16%of the dry cleaners in the program, to
collect certifications not submitted, or to clarify missing or incomplete information on the submitted forms.
At the end of this reporting period report,three operating dry-cleaning facilities failed to submit a Certification
of Zero Discharge for FY 2018/19: Mr.Green Cleaners-Cert.#300-0595, Springdale Cleaners-Cert.#397-
0895,and Superior Cleaners-Cert.#018-0295. Several attempts to personally contact the facility owners to
get the certification returned were unsuccessful as they are not normally on-site,and the facility managers or
counter clerks either didn't have the owner's phone number or wouldn't provide it to OCSD staff.Since this is
not a regulatory mandated program, no enforcement activity is planned; however, extra effort to contact the
legal owners of these facilities will be made during the next certification cycle. Two facilities failing to submit
the FY 2018/2019 certification, Apple Cleaners- Cert. #079-0395, and Artistic Cleaners- Cert. #517-0702,
were found to be closed due to evictions.
9.5 URBAN RUNOFF
OCSD accepts the diversion of urban runoff to the sewer for treatment to remediate various public health and
environmental issues which are impractical to control through traditional stormwater BMPs. Urban runoff is
9.7
water that is generated by daily activities such as lawn irrigation, hosing down sidewalks, and car washing.
As the water flows across the urban landscapes and through the storm drain system, the water becomes
contaminated with nutrients, pesticides, heavy metals, toxic chemicals, bacteria, and viruses. Once the
contaminated water reaches our creeks, rivers, and shoreline, the pollutants carry the potential to harm
wildlife and native vegetation,spoil recreational opportunities,and even cause human illness through contact
with recreational waters.
Investigation into the bacterial contamination along the Huntington Beach shoreline in 1999 suggested that,
dry weather urban runoff flowing into the ocean from the surrounding watersheds may have caused or
contributed to the resulting beach closures. Recognizing that County beaches were being affected by
pollution carried by urban runoff, the OCSD Board of Directors adopted a series of resolutions agreeing to
accept dry weather urban runoff into the sewer system. Resolution No. 01-07, adopted March 28, 2001,
declared that OCSD will initially waive fees and charges associated with authorized discharges of dry weather
urban runoff to the sewer system until the total volume of all runoff discharges exceeds 4 million gallons per
day(MGD)calculated on a monthly average. In June 2002,Assembly Bill 1892 amended OCSD's charterto
formally allow the diversion and management of dry weather urban runoff flows. For the first 12 years of the
Urban Runoff Program, the average monthly flow averages remained less than the 4 MGD threshold, thus
avoiding user fee costs being assessed to the diversion permittees. In 2012, OCSD received several
diversion proposals to deal with bacteria, nitrogen, and selenium loading to the Upper Newport Bay. The
discharge from the additional proposed diversions combined with the existing diversion flows would eventually
exceed the fee threshold. On June 12, 2013, the Board of Directors adopted Urban Runoff Resolution No.
13-09 which expanded the waiver of fees or charges on the treatment of dry weather urban runoff from 4
MGD to 10 MGD.This latest policy opened the door to additional flows to help remediate other environmental
problems, including the excessive loading in the Upper Newport Bay Watershed. The latest resolution's
adoption once again demonstrated OCSD's commitment to protecting public health and the environment.
Under Resolution No. 13-09, the cities or agencies are authorized to divert a maximum of 10 MGD for all
permitted urban runoff diversions combined. OCSD continues to work closely with Orange County
Watersheds, the lead agency that coordinates the cities' efforts in implementing the Water Quality
Management Plan required by the County of Orange's NPDES permit. Before a diversion is implemented,the
proposed project is presented to OC Watersheds'Technical Advisory Committee. The committee evaluates
the proposal, and, if approved, puts the diversion on their Dry Weather Diversion Priority List. This approval
step ensures that the program's limited capacity is effectively utilized to improve coastal water quality.
Once OC Watersheds accepts a new diversion proposal, OCSD will initiate an Agreement for Dry Weather
Urban Runoff Discharge with the responsible entity. The agreement cites the reasons that the discharge is
being accepted and details the responsibilities of the entity,or agency,that will be maintaining and operating
the diversion. The agreement stipulates that the quality and quantity of the Dry Weather Urban Runoff from
the Drainage Area shall meet all terms, conditions, and discharge limits contained in OCSD's Wastewater
Discharge Regulations.
In addition to the agreement,the Resource Protection Division administers the Urban Runoff Program through
the issuance of a discharge permit for each of the diversion structures. The permit establishes discharge
limits,constituent monitoring,and flow metering requirements, as well as provides guidelines that specifically
prohibit storm runoff, thus authorizing discharge only during periods of dry weather.
9.5.1 Dry Weather Diversion Systems and Urban Runoff Flow
Currently there are 21 active urban runoff diversion structures, 3 owned and operated by the County of
Orange, 11 owned and operated by the City of Huntington Beach, 3 owned and operated by the City of
Newport Beach,3 owned and operated by the Irvine Ranch Water District(IRWD),and 1 owned and operated
by PH Finance, who is the present owner of the Pelican Hill Resort.
Table 9.9 shows the range of monthly diversion discharges and the total discharge over the past six years.
9.8
TABLE 9.9 Dry Weather Urban Runoff Discharges, FY 2013/14- FY 2018/19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
July through June Gallons Discharged Monthly Average
MG Flow Range MGD
2013-2014 386 0.59 to 1.72
2014-2015 412 0.71 to 1.49
2015-2016 262 0.32 to 1.21
2016-2017 369 0.18 to 1.58
2017-2018 461 0.29 to 1.90
2018-2019 337 0.28 to 1.56
The diversions cumulatively discharged 337 million gallons(MG)of urban runoff,with a normalized discharge
of 1.03 MGD, and a monthly flow range between 0.28 and 1.56 MGD. The flow volume trended downward by
124 MG from the previous year,after two years of consecutive increases. A number of items appear to have
contributed to this decrease in flow. The temporary cessation of the drought during FY 2018/19 translated to
a total of 89 days,over 8 events,when the diversions were deactivated due to wet weather. That is up from a
total of 49 days and just 3 events during FY 2017/18. Forty fewer potential discharge days at the normalized
flow rate of 1.03 MGD account for 41 MG,a third of the decrease,while another 51 MG appears to be due to
operational difficulties at a number of Huntington Beach diversions, including two diversions which were non-
operational for the entire year.
Flows for the eleven City of Huntington Beach diversions decreased 51.0 MG from FY 2017/18 totals. Flows
for the three active Orange County Public Works(OCPW)diversions, Huntington Beach,Greenville Channel,
and Santa Ana River, decreased 20.9 MG from the previous year. The Greenville Channel diverted flow to
the Fairview Park wetlands in the City of Costa Mesa for 10 months in FY 2018/19, and ended the year
diverting a total of 4.0 MG to OCSD in November and June, a 3.4 MG decrease from FY 2017/18. OCPW's
HB Diversion experienced the largest decrease at 16.3 MG despite having a continuous year-round
discharge. The flow from the three IRWD diversions, Muddy Canyon, Los Trancos Canyon, and Peters
Canyon,decreased 60.6 MG overall,with the Peters Canyon Diversion contributing a majority 46.5 MG to the
decrease. Since it is not likely reduced surface flows would coincide with this high rainfall year, the high
number of deactivation days appears the most probable cause for the majority of this flow decrease. The flow
from the City of Newport Beach diversions increased 8.4 MG over the previous year,with the Big Canyon and
Mid Big Canyon Diversions contributing approximately equal volumes, 7.6 and 7.3 MG respectively, to the
Newport Beach 15.4 MG flow total. The Pelican Point Diversion flow continues to remain consistent with
previous report periods.
Only three of the twenty-one diversions, the Santa Ana River, the Peters Canyon Pipeline, and a portion of
the Scenario Diversion flow to Plant 1. Due to the multiple paths that the Scenario flows can take to reach
OCSD Plant 1 or Plant 2 simultaneously, it is not possible to accurately determine how much water from this
diversion is available for the GWRS. The remaining 18 diversions are located closer to the coast flow to Plant
2 and are not currently available for reclamation. The Santa Ana River and Peters Canyon Pipeline
Diversions discharged a total of 120 MG to Plant 1 in FY 2018/19. These two diversions account for 35.7%of
the total urban runoff diverted to the OCSD's collection system in FY 2018/19 and contributed an average of
10 MG per month to GWRS.
OCSD expects to receive between 400 and 600 MG this coming year if current discharge trends continue.
During the past 20 years, OCSD treated 9.8 billion gallons of dry weather urban runoff that would have
otherwise gone into the ocean without treatment. Since OCSD's Urban Runoff Program began, total
treatment cost has reached approximately$10.6 million, based upon applicable industrial userfee rates over
this period. OCSD currently waives all fees and charges associated with authorized discharges of Dry
Weather Urban Runoff.
9.9
Table 9.10 details the current diversion locations,trunkline/tributary destinations,and the average discharge
volume of each individual location for this reporting period.
TABLE 9.10 Average Urban Runoff Discharge Volume by Diversion, FY 2018/19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Average
Urban Runoff Diversions Location Trunkline Tributary Discharge*
(MGD)'
No. Description II
Owned and Managed by City of Huntington Beach
Coast (via
1 Atlanta Diversion 8151 Atlanta Avenue Atlanta Plant 2 0.162
Interceptor)
2 Banning Diversion 2201 Malibu Lane Miller-Holder Plant 2 0.074 A
Coast (via
F3 ] Newland Diversion 8612 Hamilton Street Atlanta Plant 2 0.000 B
Interceptor)
4 Indianapolis Diversion 9221 Indianapolis Miller-Holder Plant 2 0.048
5 Hamilton Diversion 10101 Hamilton Avenue Miller-Holder Plant 2 0.000 C
6 Meredith Diversion 20192 Mainland Lane Miller-Holder Plant 2 0.015
7 Flounder Diversion 9731 Flounder Drive Bushard Plant 2 0.011 E
8 Yorktown Diversion 9211 Yorktown Avenue Miller-Holder Plant 2 0.005
9 Adams Diversion 19661 Chesapeake Lane Miller-Holder Plant 2 0.035 F
10 Scenario Diversion 4742 Scenario Drive Knott Plant 1 & 2- 0.022
11 1st Street CDS 103 Pacific Coast Hwy Coast Plant 2 0.008
Owned and Managed by County of Orange
12 Greenville-Banning Channel 2501 Placentia Avenue Interplant Plant 2 0.033 c
13 Huntington Beach Channel 8092 Adams Avenue Coast Plant 2 0.108
14 Santa Ana River 10844 Ellis Avenue Sunflower Plant 1 0.036 "
Owned and Managed by Irvine Ranch Water District
15 Los Trancos Diversion Pacific Coast Highway South Coast Plant 2 0.092
(Crystal Cove State Park
16 Muddy Canyon Diversion Pacific Coast Highway South Coast Plant 2 0.019
(El Moro State Park)
17 Peters Canyon Diversion 3001 Main Street Main Street Plant 1 0.306
Owned and Managed by City of Newport Beach
Newport Dunes Diversion South Coast 1
18 (Gravity Flow) 1131 Back Bay Drive (via Back Bay) Plant 2 0.003
19 Big Canyon 15 Rue Verte Lane South Coast Plant 2 0.040 J
20 Mid Big Canyon 1851 Jamboree Road South Coast Plant 2 0.040 K
(via Back Bay)
Owned and Managed by PH Finance, LLC
21 Pelican Point Diversion 36 Pelican Point Drive South Coast Plant 2 0.007
Sum of the Average Daily Discharges (FY 2018/19) 1.026/ MGD'
9.10
TABLE 9.10 Average Urban Runoff Discharge Volume by Diversion, FY 2018/19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Average
Urban Runoff Diversions Location Trunkline Tributary Discharge*
MGD '
Individual daily averages calculated using the formula-cumulative flow total for the year/number of discharge days
Scenario flows to Plant 1 and Plant 2 simultaneously due to Bushard-Ellis junction box
Million Gallons per Day
A.Banning: System off-line Nov, Feb though Jun(six-month average)
B. Newland: System off-line for the entire year
C. Hamilton: System off-line for the entire year
D.Meredith: System off-line Jul,Oct through Dec(eight-month average)
E.Flounder: System off-line in Sep(eleven-month average)
F.Adams: System off-line Nov through Jun(four-month average)
G.Greenville: System off-line Jul,Aug, Dec through May(four-month average)
H.Santa Ana: System off-line Dec through Mar(eight-month average)
I. Newport Dunes: System off-line in Nov through Apr(six-month average)
J. Big Canyon: System off-line Nov though Apr(six-month average)
K. Mid Big Canyon: System off-line Nov through Apr(six-month average)
Table 9.11 summarizes several significant Urban Runoff Program statistics.
TABLE 9.11 Urban Runoff Program, FY 2018/19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Item Count
New permits generated 21*
Permitted diversions 21
Total average daily discharge 1.03 MGD
Monthly average daily discharge range 0.28- 1.56 MGD
Proposed diversions 2**
Estimated combined discharge for proposed/pending diversions 2.4 MGD
Maximum combined urban runoff discharge allowance 10 MGD***
*All urban runoff permits generated this reporting period were permit renewals, no new diversion permits issued.
**Reduced from three on previous annual report as the Arches diversion moved from proposed to pending status.
***Resolution No. 13-09 accommodates 10 MGD of urban runoff without cost to permittees.
9.5.2 Proposed Urban Runoff Diversion Systems
The City of Newport Beach's Arches Diversion project consists of two diversions near the intersection of
Newport Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway. The project has already been vetted with OC Watershed's
Technical Advisory Committee and is in the final design stage. For the past year, OCSD's Engineering
Planning Division has been working with the City of Newport Beach on the design specifications for the first
diversion on Newport Boulevard.
Construction on the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel Diversion in the City of Santa Ana is nearing completion and
will likely go on-line within the next fiscal year. OCSD is currently working on the agreement for the Santa
9.11
Ana-Delhi Channel dry weather urban runoff diversion discharge to be executed between OCSD and Orange
County Flood Control District/Orange County Public Works. The Santa Ana-Delhi Channel Diversion is
projected to add an additional 1.4 MGD of flow to OCSD's Plant 1. There are two additional flood control
channel diversions in the City of Santa Ana in the proposal stage,the Santa Fe and the Lane which are both
proposed to be 0.5 MGD diversions. A recent inquiry about the Lane Channel Diversion suggests this may be
the next diversion project pursued.
9.5.3 Dry Weather Urban Runoff Quality
OCSD requires self-monitoring of the urban runoff discharges and also conducts semi-annual sampling and
analysis to ensure discharge limit compliance for various regulated constituents.
Overall,the monitoring of the urban runoff discharges shows very consistent compliance with OCSD's Local
Limits. The Urban Runoff Program recorded a single Total Sulfide exceedance at the Yorktown Diversion
during this reporting period. That monitoring event indicated a Total Sulfide analytical result of 9.45 mg/L,
4.45 mg/L over the Local Discharge Limit of 5.0 mg/L. Although the Dissolved Sulfide at the same monitoring
event was also elevated,0.28 mg/L, it was still below the Local Discharge Limit of 0.5 mg/L. The subsequent
monitoring event at that diversion reported a Total Sulfide value of non-detect. The sulfide resample
monitoring for the 1 st Street Continuous Deflective Separation (CDS) Diversion, pending as of the previous
period's close,confirmed the diversion back in compliance with a Total Sulfide result of 4.49 mg/L,and a non-
detect value for Dissolved Sulfide. Due to the sporadic but reoccurring sulfide exceedances at the City of
Huntington Beach locations,the City has finally proposed a rotating cleaning schedule for the diversion wet
wells and CDS chamber to remove the settled debris. The cleaning is expected to also help prevent the more
extreme weather events from mobilizing the sediment and transporting it to the receiving waters.
During this report period, a single pesticide constituent, diazinon, with a value of 13 ng/L,just slightly above
the detectable limit, was submitted for the OCPW-Huntington Beach Diversion. The detectable value was
well within the Local Discharge Limit of 0.01 mg/L. This one result is down from four detected values the
previous reporting period. None of the fifty Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 624 grab
samples collected for total toxic organics(TTOs)had any detectable constituents. Although OCSD no longer
has a local limit for TTOs since the adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-48 in 2016, the Resource Protection
Division continues to monitor for TTOs as a safety measure to screen for pollutants of concern.
A detectable concentration of Oil and Grease of Mineral or Petroleum Origin was found in only one sample
out of 41 samples collected,2.4%.The reported value of 2.31 mg/L was well within the Local Discharge Limit
of 100.0 mg/L. Monitoring results for the metal constituents were all well within the Local Discharge Limits.
Table 9.12 summarizes the minimum and maximum concentrations detected in the urban runoff during the
reporting period. OCSD's latest Instantaneous Discharge Limits are included for comparison.
9.12
TABLE 9.12 Urban Runoff Compliance, FY 2018/19
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Minimum Maximum Instantaneous
Constituent Concentration Reported* Concentration Reported Discharge Limit
(mg/1) (mg/L) (mg/L)
Ammonia N ND (<0.05) 2.82 None
BOD ND <20 33 None
TSS ND (<10) 189** None
Cadmium ND (<0.007) 0.06 1.0
Chromium ND (<0.01) 0.06 20.0
Copper ND (<0.01) 0.70 3.0
Lead ND (<0.02) 0.07 2.0
Molybdenum ND (<0.01) 0.62 2.3
Nickel ND (<0.01) 0.26 10.0
Selenium ND <0.01 0.52 3.9
Zinc ND (<0.02) 1.51 10.0
Oil &Grease Min. ND (<0.7) 2.31 100
Sulfide (Dissolved) ND (<0.1) 0.28 0.5
Sulfide Total ND <0.1 9.45 5.0
Pesticides ND (<0.00025) 1 0.000013*** 0.01
Total Toxic Organics ND (<0.01) I No Detectable Values Reported None
* ND-Non-Detectable(below analytical detection limits).
** Two outliers of 530 and 408 mg/I(not included above)were likely not representative of actual discharges,and likely
the result of poor monitoring probe placement or sample collection techniques.
*** Detectable analytical value due entirely to Diazinon.
OCSD's Urban Runoff Program continues its success in helping to maintain the quality of the receiving waters
along the Orange County Coastline. For a third year in a row, Orange County's beaches have received very
favorable ratings from Heal the Bay's annual report. Overall, Summer Dry and Winter Dry grades were on par
with the five-year average, with 97%A or B grades for the Dry Weather periods, and 93%A or B grades for
the Wet Weather Dry, matching the 93% for 2016/17. Southern California received a total of 76 inches of
rain, 43% higher than the historical average of 53 inches, which probably caused the decrease in Wet
Weather Grades overall. The lingering effects of the rain likely had a negative impact on the Winter Dry
Grades as well.
OCSD's Urban Runoff Program provides an important economic benefit to the Orange County economy by
maintaining the coastline's reputation as a desirable tourist destination. By helping to keep our beaches
open, the program continues to provide a significant benefit to the beach-going public.
The role of the Urban Runoff Program expanded with the addition of diversions issued to the Big Canyon
permit on February 1, 2015; Peters Canyon on July 1, 2016; and Mid Big Canyon on August 9, 2017.
Constructed to reduce selenium-laden waters reaching the Upper Newport Bay,these diversions enhance the
estuarine environment for the threatened and endangered species that inhabit the area. Based upon Orange
County Watersheds'estimate, diversion of the various Peters Canyon Wash and Big Canyon tributaries will
decrease the amount of selenium reaching the bay by 150 to 250 pounds annually. Based upon the flow and
monitoring data received for these three diversions, 60.6 pounds of selenium were diverted from the bay
during the FY 2018/19 reporting period.
This rerouting of urban runoff from stormwater pump stations, flood control channels, and natural
conveyances before it reaches receiving waters,allows OCSD to provide essential regional public health and
water quality protection. In this manner,the program is instrumental in providing vital protection to the Areas
of Special Biological Significance along Orange County's coastline.
9.13
9.5.4 Urban Runoff Diversion Locations
The diversion systems are located in four different watersheds in Orange County: Anaheim Bay-Huntington
Harbor, Lower Santa Ana River, Newport Bay,and Newport Coastal. These watersheds encompass a variety
of designated land uses such as residential, commercial, industrial, and agriculture.
9.6 DENTAL AMALGAM
On June 14,2017,the EPA published technology-based Pretreatment Standards under the Clean Water Act
to reduce discharges of mercury from dental offices into municipal sewage treatment plants known as Publicly
Owned Treatment Works. The new Dental Office Point Source Category requires dental offices to utilize
amalgam separators and implement two BMPs. The Dental Office Point Source Category became effective
on July 14, 2017.
New dental facilities opened on or after July 14, 2017, designated Pretreatment Standards New Sources
(PSNS), must immediately comply with pretreatment standards, including the installation of amalgam
separators. A One-Time Compliance Report must be submitted to OCSD no later than 90 days following the
introduction of wastewater to OCSD. Although PSNS does not include the purchase of an existing dental
facility, those facilities changing ownership must also submit their report no later than 90 days following the
transfer. Existing facilities designated as Pretreatment Standards Existing Sources that started before July
14, 2017 without amalgam separators on June 14, 2017, must install amalgam separators by July 14, 2020
and submit their One-Time Compliance Reports by October 12,2020. Existing dental facilities with amalgam
separators on June 14, 2017 must replace those separators by June 14, 2027 or whenever the amalgam
separator needs to be replaced, whichever is earlier.
To conform to this federal Pretreatment Program requirement,OCSD implemented a Dental Amalgam Source
Control Program to enable the dental offices to comply with this new regulation. OCSD developed and
posted Dental Office Point Source Category information on the OCSD website(www.ocsd.com)complete with
links to the EPA's development document,effluent guidelines,fact sheet,and the applicable Dental Category
regulation. This information was present on the website as of August 2017. Two compliance reports forms
were developed for the dental facilities: a comprehensive form for facilities that place or remove amalgam,
and a second exempt/limited form for facilities that only remove amalgam on a limited or emergency basis.
The forms were first made available in September 2017.
As required by the regulation, OCSD implemented procedures for receiving, reviewing, and retaining dental
office Compliance Reports. OCSD conducted its first mass mailing to 922 dental offices in OCSD's service
area in January 2018, and as of the end of this reporting period, has received and processed 195 reports.
OCSD is currently assisting the dental offices with their report submittal and expects this activity to continue
until the required amalgam separator installation and report submittal deadlines are reached, July 14, 2020
and October 12, 2020 respectively. OCSD plans to continue reaching out to the dental community and
assisting the dental offices with the new regulation during this critical compliance period.
9.7 PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH
Resource Protection Division staff routinely works with its Member Agencies, attends outside
agency/association meetings, conferences, and workshops; serves on committees; and gives
presentations. Working with Member Agencies and outside agencies and associations benefits
OCSD by keeping abreast of potential future regulation and trends which may be beneficial or have
impacts that OCSD must prepare for, as well as providing information to the public about OCSD's
programs. Listed below are public outreach activities for FY 2018/19.
9.7.1 Industrial Environmental Coalition of Orange County
On January 24, 2019, a Pretreatment Program staff member presented an OCSD Regulatory
9.14
Update at the Industrial Environmental Coalition of Orange County (IEC/OC) Annual Regulatory
Update meeting. The IEC/OC provides a forum for communication between industry and
government on environmental health and safety issues. The Pretreatment Program staff member
informed about 75 members about OCSD's NPDES Permit renewal and Dental Amalgam Program,
Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) issues, pending Nutrient Regulation, Constituents of
Emerging Concern, infrastructure financing, and EPA's strategic initiatives.
9.15
appendices
Monitoring and Compliance Status Report
Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Analyses
Priority Pollutants
Fees/Penalties for Non-Compliances
Public Notice of Significantly Non-Compliant Industries
Acknowledgements
IRWD Sampling
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) Reports, Data, SNC Notice
QA/QC Analysis Results
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
appendix a
MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE
STATUS REPORT
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SILls with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
Violation
9W Halo Western opCo,L.P. 1-600378 1575 N.Case St, 18123321 403.5(d) 4 18 3
Orange,CA 92867
18330 Ward St,
A&G Electropolish 1-531422 Fountain Valley,CA 332813 433.17(a) 4 16 7
92708
A&K Deburring and 2008 S.Yale St,H
1-511362 Unit,Santa Ana,CA 332812 403.5(d) 4 21 4
Tumbling,Inc. 92704
1198 N.Grove St,B
A&R Powder Coating,Inc. 1-021088 Unit,Anaheim,CA 332812 433.17(a) 4 18 7 Molybdenum
92806
5600 Beach Blvd,
Access Business Group,LLC 1-531435 Buena Park,CA 325412 439.47 4 11 10
90621
Accurate Circuit Engineering 1-011138 3019 Kilson Dr,SantaAna,CA 92707 334412 433.17(a) 6 24 $ silver
Published as
Significantly
Non-
Active Plating,Inc. 1-011115 1411 E.Pomona St, 332813 433.17(a) 5 37 29 Zinc Compliant
Santa Ana,CA 92705
(SNC)for
Reporting
Violation(s)
Advance Tech Plating,Inc. 1-021389 1061 N.Grove St, 332813 433.17(a) 6 43 7 zinc
Anaheim,CA 92806
7100 Chapman Ave,
Air Industries Company,A 1-031013 Garden Grove,CA 332722 403.5(d) 4 6 6
PCC Company(Chapman) 92841
Air Industries Company,A 12570 Knott St, 433.15(a),471.64(a),
PCC Company(Knott) 1-531404 Garden Grove,CA 332722 471.65(a) 4 41 64
92841
Alex C. Fergusson 1-031186 8371 Monroe Ave, 325611 417.166,417.176, 4 23 4
Stanton,CA 90680 417.36
19065 Stewart St,
Alexander Oil Company 1-581185 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 4 23 4
CA 92648
All Metals Processing of O.C., 1-031110 8401 Standustrial St, 332813 433.17(a) 4 34 28
Inc. Stanton,CA 90680
Alliance Medical Products, 1-541182 9342 Jeronimo Rd, 325412 439.47 4 15 10
Inc. Irvine,CA 92618
Allied Electronics Services, 1-011073 1342 E.Borchard Unk, 334412 433.17(a) 4 31 8
Inc. Santa Ana,CA 92705
Page 1 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SILls with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
Violation
464.15(a),464.15(b),
6550 Caballero Blvd, 464.15(c),464.15(h),
Alloy Die Casting Co. 1-531437 Buena Park,CA 331523 464.45(a),464.45(b), 4 24 16
90620
464.45(d)
Alloy Tech Electropolishing, 1-011036 2220 S.Huron Dr, 332812 433.17(a) 5 20 14 Molybdenum
Inc. ISanta Ana,CA 92704
Alsco,Inc. 1-021656 1755 S.Anaheim Blvd, 812331 403.5(d) 4 23 16
Anaheim,CA 92802
Aluminum Forge-Div.of 1-071035 502 E.Alton Ave, 332112 467.46 3 15 22
Alum.Precision Santa Ana,CA 92707
Aluminum Precision Products, 1-011038 3132 W.Central Unk, 332112 467.45 4 15 10
Inc.(Central) ISanta Ana,CA 92704
Aluminum Precision Products, 1-011100 2621 S.Susan St, 332112 467.45,467.46 4 20 16
Inc.(Susan) Santa Ana,CA 92704
Aluminum Precision Products, 1-511387 3323 W.WarnerAve, 332112 467.46 4 15 10
Inc.(Warner) Santa Ana,CA 92704
American Circuit Technology, 1-021249 5330 E.Hunter Ave, 334412 433.17(a) 3 20 8
Inc. Anaheim,CA 92807
Amerimax Building Products, 1-021102 1411 N.Daly St, 332812 465.35 4 14 8
Inc. Anaheim,CA 92806
6965 Aragon Cir,
Ameripec,Inc. 1-031057 Buena Park,CA 312111 403.5(d) 4 20 2
90620
1330&1340
Anaheim Extrusion Co.,Inc. 1-021168 N.Kraemer Blvd, 331318 467.35(c) 4 16 7
Anaheim,CA 92806
Anchen Pharmaceuticals,Inc. 1-541180 72 Fairbanks Unk, 325412 439.47 4 13 9
(Fairbanks) Irvine,CA 92618
Anchen Pharmaceuticals,Inc. 1-600359 5 Goodyear Unk, 325412 439.47 4 12 10 acetone
(Goodyear) Irvine,CA 92618
Anchen Pharmaceuticals,Inc. 1-541179 9601 Jeronimo Rd, 325412 439.47 4 13 13
(Jeronimo) Irvine,CA 92618
1055 Ortega Way,C
Andres Technical Plating 1-521798 Unit,Placentia,CA 332813 433.17(a) 4 13 22
92870
1102 East
AnoChem Coatings 1-600295 Washington Ave, 332813 433.17(a) 4 31 13
Santa Ana,CA 92701
Anodyne,Inc. 1-511389 2230 S.Susan St, 332813 433.17(a) 4 26 73
Santa Ana,CA 92704
Page 2 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division i
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SILls with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status
Violation
Anomil Ent. Dba Danco Metal 1-011155 401 Rowland Unk, 332813 433.17(a) 4 31 20
Surfacing Santa Ana,CA 92707
APCT Orange County 1-600503 1900 Petra Ln,C Unit, 334412 433.17(a) 6 40 68 Copper
Placentia,CA 92870
433.15(a),433.17(a), Published as
467.46,471.65(i), Significantly
800 S.State College 471.65(j),471.65(m), Non-
ings R CGlobal Fasteners& 1-021081 Blvd,Fullerton,CA 332722 471.65(n),471.65(o), 5 66 32 Cadmium, Compliant
Rings,Inc. 92831 471.65(p),471.65(q), Molybdenum (SNC)for
471.65(r),471.65(s), Discharge
471.65(w),471.65(x) Violation(s)
ARO Service 1-021192 1186 N.Grove St, 336411 433.17(a) 5 16 7
Anaheim,CA 92806
Arrowhead Products 1-031137 4411 Katella Ave,Los 336413 433.17(a) 4 28 19
Corporation Alamitos,CA 90720
Aseptic Technology LLC 1-600716 4940 E.Landon Dr, 31193 403.5(d) 2 6 3 New Class 1
Anaheim,CA 92807 Permit Issued
24855 Corbit PI, Class 1 Permit
Aseptic Technology,LLC 1-501002 Yorba Linda,CA 31193 403.5(d) 3 14 11 Deactivated
92887
Astech Engineered Products, 1-571295 3030 Red Hill Ave, 336412 433.17(a) 4 26 20
Inc. Santa Ana,CA 92705
Auto-Chlor System of 1-511384 530 Goetz Ave,Santa 325611 417.166 4 20 10
Washington, Inc. Ana,CA 92707
Aviation Equipment 1571 MacArthur Blvd,
1-071037 Costa Mesa,CA 336413 433.17(a) 4 18 8
Processing 92626
Avid Bioservices,Inc. 1-571332 14191 Myford Rd, 325414 439.17,439.27 4 12 4
Tustin,CA 92780
B.Braun Medical,Inc. 1-071054 2525 Mcgaw Ave, 325412 439.47,463.26, 4 22 5
(East/Main) Irvine,CA 92614 463.36
B.Braun Medical,Inc. 1-600382 2206Alton Pkwy, 325412 439.47 4 17 5
(North/Alton) Irvine,CA 92614
B.Braun Medical,Inc. 1-541183 2525 Mcgaw Ave, 325412 439.47,463.16, 5 21 5
(West/Lake) Irvine,CA 92614 463.26,463.36
11371 Monarch St,
Basic Electronics,Inc. 1-031094 Garden Grove,CA 334412 433.17(a) 4 18 11
92841
12700 Western Ave,
Bazz Houston Co. 1-031010 Garden Grove,CA 33211 403.5(d) 4 26 13 O&G min.
92841
Page 3 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SILls with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
Violation
Beckman Coulter, Inc. 11-521824 200 S.Kraemer Blvd, 13345161 433.17(a) 4 16 8
Brea,CA 92821
Beo-Mag Plating 1-511370 3313 W.Harvard St, 332813 433.17(a) 4 17 29 CN
Santa Ana,CA 92704
Bimbo Bakeries Usa,Inc. 1-521838 500 S.Placentia Ave, 311812 403.5(d) 4 22 4
Placentia,CA 92870
1735 N.Orangethorpe
Black Oxide Industries, Inc. 1-021213 Park,Anaheim,CA 332812 433.17(a) 4 16 7
92801
5837 Casson Dr,
Blue Lake Energy 1-521785 Yorba Linda,CA 211111 403.5(d) 4 17 4
92886
7474 Garden Grove
Bodycote Thermal Processing 1-031120 Blvd,Westminster, 332811 403.5(d) 5 29 4
CA 92683
15400 Graham St,
Boeing Company(Graham) 1-111018 Huntington Beach, 33641 433.17(a) 4 21 8
CA 92649
Brasstech, Inc 1-600316 1301 E.Wilshire Ave, 332813 433.17(a) 3 11 11 New Class 1
Santa Ana,CA 92705 Permit Issued
Brasstech, Inc. 1-511368 3230 S.Standard Ave, 332813 433.17(a) 1 5 4 Class 1 Permit
Santa Ana,CA 92705 Deactivated
Brea Power II,LLC 1-521837 1935 Valencia Ave, 221112 403.5(d) 4 23 S
Brea,CA 92823
Bridge Energy, LLC 1-600398 2744 Valencia Ave, 211111 403.5(d) 4 19 6
Brea,CA 92821
2930 E.Frontera St,A
Bridgemark Corporation 1-521844 Unit,Anaheim,CA 211111 403.5(d) 3 14 4
92806
221 1st St,
Brindle/Thomas-Bradley 1-531428 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 3 29 4
CA 92648
Brindle/Thomas-Brooks& 18462 Edwards St,
1-531429 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 4 29 4
Kohlbush CA 92648
Brindle/Thomas-Catalina& 18851 Stewart Ln,
1-531430 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 3 29 4
Copeland CA 92648
Brindle/Thomas-Dabney& 19192 Stewart Ln,
Patton 1-531427 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 3 29 4
CA 92648
Page 4 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SIUs with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status
Violation
433.17(a),467.36(c), Published as
471.35(dd), Significantly
630 E.Lambert Rd, 471.35(ee), Cadmium,CN, Non-
Bristol Industries 1-021226 332722 471.35(ff),471.35(i), 6 S9 25 Compliant
Brea,CA 92821 CN amen.,Silver
471.35(r),471.35(s), (SNC)for
471.35(t),471.35(u), Discharge
471.35(v) Violation(s)
Broncs,Inc.,dba WesCoast 12641 Industry St,
1-600519 Garden Grove,CA 313310 403.5(d) 4 0 0
Textiles,Inc. 92841
Brothers International 1-600583 1682 Kettering St, 311520 403.5(d) 3 14 3 New Class 1
Desserts(North) Irvine,CA 92614 Permit Issued
Brothers International 1-600582 1682 Kettering St, 311520 403.5(d) 3 14 3 New Class 1
Desserts(West) Irvine,CA 92614 Permit Issued
Burlington Engineering,Inc. 1-521770 220 W.Grove Ave, 332811 433.17(a) 4 14 6
Orange,CA 92865
Cadillac Plating,Inc. 1-021062 1147 W.Struck Ave, 332813 433.17(a) 7 28 58 Nickel,Zinc
Orange,CA 92867
15632 Container Ln,
Cal-Aurum Industries,Inc. 1-111089 Huntington Beach, 332813 433.17(a) 4 38 31 Cadmium
CA 92649
California Gasket and Rubber 1-521832 533 W.Collins Ave, 339991 428.66(a) 4 13 4
Corporation Orange,CA 92867
Cargill, Inc. 1-031060 600 N.Gilbert St, 311225 403.5(d) 4 15 12
Fullerton,CA 92833
Published as
Significantly
Catalina Cylinders,A Div.of 7300 Anaconda Ave, Non-
1-031021 Garden Grove,CA 331318 467.46 4 19 10 O&G min. Compliant
APP 92841 (SNC)for
Discharge
Violation(s)
12650 Westminster
CD Video,Inc. 1-511076 Ave,Garden Grove, 334613 433.17(a) 4 18 8
CA 92706
Central Powder Coating 1-021189 593 Explorer St,Brea, 332812 433.17(a) 6 29 8 Molybdenum
CA 92821
Ceradyne, Inc.,a 31M 1-600691 17466 Daimler St, 339114 403.5(d) 1 7 0 New Class 1
Company Irvine,CA 92614 Permit Issued
Chromadora, Inc. 1-511414 2515 S.Birch St,Santa 332813 433.17(a) 4 17 20
Ana,CA 92707
Page 5 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SILls with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
Violation
Circuit Technology,Inc. 11-521821 1911 N.Main St, 334112 433.17(a) 3 18 7
Orange,CA 92865
Cirtech, Inc. 1-021133 250 E.Emerson Ave, 334112 433.17(a) 2 15 16 Class 1 Permit
Orange,CA 92865 Deactivated
Cirtech, Inc. 1-600689 250 E.Emerson Ave, 334112 433.17(a) 2 14 8 New Class 1
Orange,CA 92865 Permit Issued
City of Anaheim-Public 6751 E.Walnut
1-021073 Canyon Rd,Anaheim, 221310 403.5(d) 4 4 22
Utilities Dept CA 92807
City Of Anaheim-Public 1-521862 1144 N.Kraemer Blvd, 221112 403.5(d) 4 7 1
Utilities Dept. Anaheim,CA 92806
City of Anaheim Public 210 S.Anaheim
Utilities(Water Services 1-521843 Anaheim,CAA 92805 Blvd, 221320 403.5(d) 4 6 0
Ana
WRDF)
City of Anaheim,Canyon 3071 E.Miraloma
1-600296 Ave,Anaheim,CA 221112 403.5(d) 4 17 2
Power Plant 92806
19081 Huntington St,
City of Huntington Beach Fire 1-111015 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 4 21 6
Department CA 92648
5810 West Coast New Class 1
City of Newport Beach 1-600584 Hwy,Newport Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 3 0 2 Permit Issued
CA 92660
City of Tustin-Maintenance 1-071058 1472 Service Rd, 921190 403.5(d) 4 22 5
Yard Tustin,CA 92780
City of Tustin Water Service 1-071013 18602 E.17th St, 221310 403.5(d) 2 10 1
(17Th St.) Tustin,CA 92705
City of Tustin,Water Service 1-071268 235 E.Main St,Tustin, 221310 403.5(d) 0 0 0
(Main St) CA 92780
500 State College
C1 Foods Manufacturing Corp. 1-521849 Blvd,Fullerton,CA 311824 403.5(d) 4 18 12
92831
5332 Commercial St,
Coast to Coast Circuits,Inc. 1-111129 Huntington Beach, 334412 433.17(a) 4 27 19
CA 92649
7061 Patterson Dr,
Coastline Metal Finishing1-531436 Garden Grove,CA Class 1 Permit
332813 433.17(a) 3 18 12 Deactivated
92841
Page 6 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SIUs with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status
Violation
Published as
Significantly
Coastline Metal Finishing 7061 Patterson Dr, Non-
New Class 1
Corp.,A Division of Valence 1-600708 Garden Grove,CA 332813 433.17(a) 1 S 3 Compliant
SNC for Permit Issued
92841
Surface Technologies ( )
Reporting
Violation(s)
Coca-Cola Company-Anaheim 1-021392 2121 E.Winston Rd, 312112 403.5(d) 2 8 2
Water Plant Anaheim,CA 92806
4660 San Antonio Rd,
Columbine Associates 1-521784 E.on B St Dir,Yorba 211111 403.5(d) 4 13 4
Linda,CA 92886
Continuous Coating 1-021290 520 W.Grove Ave, 332812 433.17(a),465.15 7 31 20
Corporation Orange,CA 92865
Cooper and Brain,Inc. 1-031070 1390 Site Dr,Brea, 211111 403.5(d) 4 19 11 o&G min.
CA 92821
6200 Caballero Blvd, New Class 1
Corru-Kraft Buena Park 1-600806 Buena Park,CA 322211 403.5(d) 1 14 12 Permit Issued
90620
CP-Carrillo,Inc.(McGaw) 1-571316 1902 McGaw Ave, 336310 403.5(d) 4 18 7
Irvine,CA 92614
Crest Coating, Inc. 1-021289 1361 S.Allec St, 332812 433.17(a) 4 21 7
Anaheim,CA 92805
CRH California Water,Inc. 1-011051 502 S.Lyon St,Santa 561990 403.5(d) 2 9 4
Ana,CA 92701
18340 Mount Baldy
Custom Enamelers, Inc. 1-021297 Cir,Fountain Valley, 332812 433.17(a) 4 24 8
CA 92708
D.F.Stauffer Biscuit Co.,Inc. 1-600414 4041 W.GarryAve, 311821 403.5(d) 5 17 4
Santa Ana,CA 92704
Dae Shin USA,Inc. 1-031102 610 N.Gilbert St, 313310 403.5(d) 4 22 1
Fullerton,CA 92833
118962 Stewart Ln,
DAH Oil,LLC 1-581173 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 2 13 4
CA 92648
Darling International,Inc. 1-511378 2624 Hickory St, 562219 403.5(d) 4 23 9
Santa Ana,CA 92707
Data Aire,Inc.#2 1-021379 230 W.Blueridge Ave, 332322 433.17(a) 4 21 8
Orange,CA 92865
Data Electronic Services,Inc. 1-011142 410 Nantucket PI, 334412 433.17(a) 4 23 8
Santa Ana,CA 92703
Page 7 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SILls with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
Violation
Data Solder,Inc. 11-521761 2915 Kilson Dr,Santa 13344121 433.17(a) 4 16 8
Ana,CA 92707
Dayton Flavors,LLC 1-600038 580 S.Melrose Unk, 311930 403.5(d) 4 12 4
Placentia,CA 92870
4541 Heil Ave,
DCOR,LLC 1-111013 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 4 21 8
CA 92649
Diamond Environmental 1801 Via Burton
1-600244 None,B Unit, 532490 403.5(d) 4 19 6
Services, LP Fullerton,CA 92832
Dr.Smoothie Enterprises- 1-600131 1730 Raymer Ave, 311930 403.5(d) 4 21 4
DBA Bevolution Group Fullerton,CA 92833
Formerly listed
DRS Network&Imaging 1-531405 10600 Valley View St, 334413 469.18(a) 4 15 10 as DRS Sensors
Systems, LLC Cypress,CA 90630 &Targeting
Systems,Inc.
IDS Services of America 1-021393 1522 N.Newhope St, 312112 403.5(d) 3 17 4
Santa Ana,CA 92703
Ducommun Aerostructures, 1-021105 1885 N.Batavia St, 336413 433.17(a) 4 26 28
Inc. Orange,CA 92865
Dunham Metal Processing 1 021325 936 N.Parker St,Orange,CA 92867 332813 433.17(a) 5 36 $ Copper,Nickel
E&B Natural Resources- 1901 California St,
1-600254 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 4 26 7
Angus Petroleum Corporation CA 92648
EFT Fast Quality Service,Inc. 1-011064 2328 S.Susan St, 334112 433.17(a) 4 16 8
Santa Ana,CA 92704
Electro Metal Finishing 1-021158 1194 N.Grove St, 332812 433.17(a) 5 17 5 Molybdenum
Corporation Anaheim,CA 92806
Electrolurgy,Inc. 1-071162 1121 Duryea Ave, 332813 433.17(a) 4 23 67
Irvine,CA 92614
13932 Enterprise Dr, Formerly listed
Electron Plating Inc. 1-021336 Garden Grove,CA 332813 433.17(a) 4 33 20 as Electron
92843 Plating III,Inc.
Electronic Precision 1-021337 537 Mercury Ln, 332813 433.17(a) 4 25 20
Specialties, Inc. Brea,CA 92821
Embee Processing(Anodize) 1-600456 2148 S.Hathaway St, 332813 413.14(c),413.54(c), 4 30 24
Santa Ana,CA 92705 413.64(c),433.17(a)
2144 S.Hathaway St, 413.14(c),413.54(c),
Embee Processing(Plate) 1-600457 Santa Ana,CA 92705 332813 413.64(c),413.74(c), 4 30 24
433.17(a)
Page 8 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SIUs with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
Violation
11-521855
Excello Circuits 1924 Nancita Cir, 334412 433.17(a) 5 41 56 Copper
Manufacturing Corp. Placentia,CA 92870
Expo Dyeing and Finishing, 1-031322 1365 Knollwood Cir, 313310 403.5(d) 4 17 1
Inc. Anaheim,CA 92801
Fabrica International,Inc. 1-011278 3201 S.Susan St, 314110 428.46 4 21 2
Santa Ana,CA 92704
Fabrication Concepts 1800 E.Saint Andrew
1-011068 PI,Santa Ana,CA 332114 433.17(a) 5 31 8
Corporation 92705
Fineline Circuits& 1-021121 594 Apollo St,Brea, 334412 433.17(a) 4 25 8
Technology,Inc. CA92821
FMH Aerospace Corp DBA 1-571331 17072 Daimler St, 332912 433.17(a) 1 10 7 Silver Class 1 Permit
FMH Corporation Irvine,CA 92614 Deactivated
FMH Aerospace Corp. 1-600585 17072 Daimler St, 332912 433.17(a) 3 18 62 New Class 1
Irvine,CA 92614 Permit Issued
Gaffoglio Family 11161 Slater Ave,
1-600443 Fountain Valley,CA 336111 426.66 4 14 2
Metalcrafters 92708
1230 E.Saint
Gallade Chemical, Inc. 1-011257 Gertrude PI,Santa 422690 403.5(d) 4 22 4
Ana,CA 92707
Gemini Industries,Inc. 1-071172 2311 Pullman St, 331492 415.24,421.265(a) 5 35 19
Santa Ana,CA 92705
General Container 5450 Dodds Ave,
1-031042 Buena Park,CA 322211 403.5(d) 4 13 7
Corporation 90621
GKN Aerospace Transparency 12122 Western Ave,
1-531401 Garden Grove,CA 336413 403.5(d) 4 20 8
Systems 92841
990 N.Enterprise St,
Gomtech Electronics,Inc. 1-021352 M Unit,Orange,CA 334412 433.17(a) 4 29 8
92867
12361 Monarch St,
Goodwin Company 1-031043 Garden Grove,CA 325611 403.5(d) 4 28 17 O&G min.
92841
Graphic Packaging 1-571314 1600 Barranca Pkwy, 322212 403.5(d) 4 11 4
International,Inc. Irvine,CA 92606
Green Clean Water&Waste 1-521857 1227 S.Claudina St, 562219 437.47(b) 0 0 2 Class 1 Permit
Services Anaheim,CA 92805 Deactivated
Page 9 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SIUs with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
Violation
6700 Caballero Blvd,
Hanson-Loran Co.,Inc. 1-031107 Buena Park,CA 325612 417.166,417.176 6 42 8
90620
Harbor Truck Bodies,Inc. 1-021286 255 Voyager Ave, 336370 433.17(a) 4 26 21
Brea,CA 92821
1015 E.Orangethorpe
Harry's Dye&Wash,Inc. 1-521746 Ave,Anaheim,CA 313310 403.5(d) 4 19 12
92801
Published as
Significantly
900 Richfield Rd, Non-
Hartwell Corporation 1-021381 Placentia,CA 92870 332999 403.5(d) 4 23 2 Compliant
(SNC)for
Reporting
Violation(s)
1650 Adolfo Lopez New Class 1
Hellman Properties,LLC 1-600273 Dr,Seal Beach,CA 211111 403.5(d) 3 17 3 Permit Issued
90740
Hi Tech Solder 1-521790 700 Monroe Way, 334412 433.17(a) 4 23 8
Placentia,CA 92870
Hightower Plating& 1-021185 2090 N.Glassell Unk, 332813 433.17(a) 4 32 19 Cadmium
Manufacturing Co. Orange,CA 92865
413.14(c),413.14(g),
829 Production PI,
413.24(c),413.24(g),
413.44(c),413.44(g), Cadmium,
Hixson Metal Finishing 1-061115 Newport Beach,CA 332813 413.54(c),413.54(g), 6 35 81 Chromium,Silver
92663 413.64(c),413.64(g),
433.17(a)
House Foods America 7351 Orangewood
1-031072 Ave,Garden Grove, 311224 403.5(d) 3 20 2
Corporation CA92841
1250&1270 N.Blue
Ideal Anodizing, Inc. 1-021041 Gum St,Anaheim,CA 332813 433.17(a) 4 24 7
92806
Ikon Powder Coating,Inc. 1-521756 1375 N.Miller St, 332812 433.17(a) 4 13 7
Anaheim,CA 92806
1380 N.Knollwood
Image Technology,Inc. 1-521755 Cir,Anaheim,CA 325611 417.86 4 9 3
92801
2007 Raymer Ave,N
Imperial Plating 1-031106 Ste,Fullerton,CA 332813 433.17(a) 4 28 62
92833
Page 10 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SILls with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
Violation
Imuraya USA, Inc. 11-541178 2502 Barranca Pkwy,13115201 403.5(d) 4 19 4
Irvine,CA 92606
Published as
Significantly
Non-
Independent Forge Company 1-021401 692 N.Batavia St, 332112 467.45 5 14 7 Zinc Compliant
Orange,CA 92868
(SNC)for
Discharge
Violation(s)
Industrial Metal Finishing,Inc. 1-521828 1941 Petra Ln, 332813 403.5(d) 4 16 8
Placentia,CA 92870
Intec Products,Inc. 1-021399 1145 N.Grove St, 314999 403.5(d) 4 23 4
Anaheim,CA 92806
Integral Aerospace,LLC 1-600243 2036 E.Dyer Rd, 336413 433.17(a) 4 20 20
Santa Ana,CA 92705
International Paper Company 1-521820 601 E.Ball Rd, 322211 403.5(d) 4 26 4
(Anaheim) Anaheim,CA 92805
International Paper Company 6485 Descanso Ave,
1-531419 Buena Park,CA 322224 403.5(d) 3 20 7
(Buena Park Bag) 90620
International Paper Company 6211 Descanso Ave,
(Buena Park Container) 1-031171 Buena Park,CA 322211 403.5(d) 4 10 3
90620
Irvine Ranch Water District 1-571327 1221 Edinger Ave, 221310 403.5(d) 2 13 2
(Wells 21/22 Desalter) Tustin,CA 92780
Irvine Ranch Water District- 1704 W.Segerstrom
DATS 1-011075 Ave,Santa Ana,CA 221310 403.5(d) 4 20 6
92704
3001 Red Hill Ave, Class 1 Permit
Irvine Sensors Corporation 1-571328 3108 Unit,Costa 541712 469.18(a) 2 13 2 Deactivated
Mesa,CA 92626
307 N.Euclid Way,H1
1&R Metal Finishing Co. 1-521823 Bldg,Anaheim,CA 332812 403.5(d) 4 20 6
92801
151 Shipyard Way,7
J&J Marine Aquisitions, LLC 1-551152 Unit,Newport Beach, 336611 403.5(d) 4 15 6 Copper
CA 92663
4311 Jamboree Rd,
Jazz Semiconductor 1-571292 Newport Beach,CA 334413 469.18(a) 4 24 2
92660
Page 11 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SIUs with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status
Violation
Published as
Significantly
Non-
JD Processing, Inc. 1-511407 Sant Cape Cod Way,a Ana,CA 92703 332813 433.17(a) 4 26 18 Compliant
Sant
(SNC)for
Reporting
Violation(s)
Jellco Container,Inc. 1-021402 1151 N.Tustin Ave, 322212 403.5(d) 4 18 6
Anaheim,CA 92807
18701 Edwards St,
John A.Thomas-Bolsa Oil 1-031065 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 4 33 8
CA 92648
Orangewood Gate,
Joint Forces Training Base,Los 1-031270 Northwest Corner of 928110 403.5(d) 4 30 1
Alamitos the Base,Los
Alamitos,CA,90720
Published as
Significantly
11691 Coley River Cir, Non-
Molybdenum,
Kenlen Specialities, Inc. 1-021171 Fountain Valley,CA 332812 433.17(a) 5 21 8 Compliant
92708 Zinc
(SNC)for
Discharge
Violation(s)
Kimberly Clark Worldwide 2001 E.Orangethorpe
1-021425 Unk,Fullerton,CA 322121 430.127 4 19 2
Inc.,Fullerton Mill 92831
Kinsbursky Brothers Supply, 1314 N.Anaheim
Inc. 1-021424 Blvd,Anaheim,CA 423930 403.5(d) 4 21 5
92801
Kirkhill TA Company(North) 1-021426 300 E.Cypress St, 339991 428.76(a) 1 5 2 Class 1 Permit
Brea,CA 92821 Deactivated
Kirkhill TA Company(South) 1-021052 Brea,CA 92821 300 E.Cypress St, 339991 428.76(a) 1 5 2 Class 1 Permit
Deactivated
Kirkhill, Inc.(North) 1-600608 300 E.Cypress St, 339991 428.76(a) 3 19 6 New Class 1
Brea,CA 92821 1 1 1 1 Permit Issued
Kirkhill, Inc.(South) 1-600609 300 E.Cypress St, 339991 428.76(a) 3 19 6 New Class 1
Brea,CA 92821 Permit Issued
Page 12 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SIUs with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status
Violation
Published as
Significantly
2450 White Rd, Non-
Kraft Heinz Company 1-071056 Irvine,CA 92614 311941 403.5(d) 5 20 3 Compliant
(SNC)for
Reporting
Violation(s)
Kryler Corporation 1-021428 1217 E.Ash Ave, 332813 413.14(b),413.14(f), 4 31 7
Fullerton,CA 92831 433.17(a)
3565 Cadillac Ave,
Kyocera Precision Tools,Inc. 1-511385 Costa Mesa,CA 333515 403.5(d) 4 17 4
92626
La Habra Bakery 1-031029 850 S.Cypress St,La 311812 403.5(d) 4 19 12
Habra,CA 90631
Legendary Baking of 1-600294 3102 W.Adams St, 311812 403.5(d) 3 11 2 Class 1 Permit
California,LLC Santa Ana,CA 92704 Deactivated
Lightning Diversion Systems 16572 Burke Ln,
LLC 1-600338 Huntington Beach, 334412 433.17(a) 4 15 8
CA 92647
528 S.Central Park
Linco Industries, Inc. 1-021253 Ave,West Dir, 332812 403.5(d) 5 28 12 O&G min.
Anaheim,CA 92802
LM Chrome Corporation 1-511361 654 Young St,Santa 332813 433.17(a) 4 31 29
Ana,CA 92705
17592 Metzler Ln,
Logi Graphics, Inc. 1-031049 Huntington Beach, 334412 433.17(a) 4 28 4
CA 92647
1215 N.Grove St, Class 1 Permit
LSW Enterprises,LLC 1-521863 Anaheim,CA 92806 562219 403.5(d) 1 0 Deactivated
5322 Mcfadden Ave,
M.S.Bellows 1-111007 Huntington Beach, 332813 433.17(a) 4 19 8
CA 92649
2475 W.La Palma
Magnetic Metals Corporation 1-531391 Ave,Anaheim,CA 335311 433.17(a) 5 22 8
92801
Manufactured Packaging 1-521793 3200 Enterprise St, 322211 403.5(d) 4 16 2
Products Brea,CA 92821
Manufactured Packaging 1-021681 1901 E.Rosslynn Ave, 322211 403.5(d) 3 20 4
Products(MPP Fullerton) Fullerton,CA 92831
1111 E.Mcfadden
Markland Manufacturing, Inc. 1-011046 Ave,Santa Ana,CA 332813 433.17(a) 4 32 28
192705
Page 13 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SILls with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
Violation
Maruchan,Inc.(Deere) 1-071024 1902 Deere Ave, 13118241 403.5(d) 5 15 4
Irvine,CA 92606
15800 Laguna
Maruchan,Inc.(Laguna Cyn) 1-141015 Canyon Rd,Irvine,CA 311824 403.5(d) 6 13 8
92618
Marukome USA, Inc. 1-141023 17132 Pullman St, 311991 403.5(d) 6 18 4
Irvine,CA 92614
Master Wash,Inc. 1-511399 3120 Kilson St,Santa 811192 403.5(d) 3 7 4
Ana,CA 92707
1601 E.Orangethorpe
Mckenna Labs, Inc. 1-021422 Ave,Fullerton,CA 325620 417.86 4 16 4
92831
MCP Foods,Inc. 1-021029 424 S.Atchison St, 311942 403.5(d) 4 13 2
Anaheim,CA 92805
Medtronic Heart Valves, Inc. 1-071051 1851 E.Deere Ave, 334510 403.5(d) 3 24 4 Class 1 Permit
Santa Ana,CA 92705 Deactivated
Meggitt, Inc. 1-600006 14600 Myford Rd, 334519 433.17(a) 4 14 8
Irvine,CA 92606
Merical,Inc. 1-521840 233 E.Bristol Ln, 325412 439.47 1 4 7 Class 1 Permit
Orange,CA 92865 Deactivated
Merical,LLC 1-600655 233 E.Bristol Ln, 325412 439.47 2 11 7 New Class 1
Orange,CA 92865 Permit Issued
1350 Gisler Ave,
Mesa Water District 1-061007 Costa Mesa,CA 221310 403.5(d) 4 13 9
92626
Micrometals,Inc. 1-021153 5615 E.La Palma Ave, 334416 433.17(a) 4 18 8
Anaheim,CA 92807
Murrietta Circuits 1-521811 5000 E.Landon St, 334412 433.17(a) 6 29 7
Anaheim,CA 92807
Nalco Cal Water,LLC 1-521748 1961 Petra Ln, 561990 403.5(d) 4 18 4
Placentia,CA 92870
Published as
Significantly
Non-
National Construction Rentals 1-600652 Sant E Ana,
C 9 Ave, 562991 403.5(d) 2 17 0 Compliant New Class 1
Santa Ana,CA 92701 Permit Issued
(SNC)for
Reporting
Violation(s)
Neutronic Stamping and 10535 Lawson River
1-521772 Ave,Fountain Valley, 334417 433.17(a) 4 1$ $
Plating CA 92708
Page 14 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SILls with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
Violation
Newport Corporation 11-071038 1791 Deere Ave, 13345161 403.5(d) 4 13 2
Irvine,CA 92606
22725 Savi Ranch
Nobel Biocare USA,LLC 1-521801 Pkwy,Yorba Linda, 339114 433.17(a) 4 21 8
CA 92887
Nor-Cal Beverage Co.,Inc. 1-021284 1226 N.Olive St, 312111 403.5(d) 4 17 2
(Main) jAnaheim,CA 92801
Nor-Cal Beverage Co.,Inc. 1-021283 1226 N.Olive St, 312111 403.5(d) 4 17 2
(NCB) Anaheim,CA 92801
7800 Palin Cir,
O'Donnell Oil Company,LLC 1-581191 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 2 8 4
CA 92648
20661 Newport Coast
O.C.Waste&Recycling 1-141018 Dr,Newport Beach, 562910 403.5(d) 4 20 5
CA 92657
Oakley, Inc. 1-141012 1 Icon Unk,Foothill 339115 463.16,463.26, 5 13 3
Ranch,CA 92610 463.36
11665 Coley River Cir,
Omni Metal Finishing,Inc. 1-021520 Fountain Valley,CA 332813 433.17(a) 5 29 19
92708
Orange County Chemical 1-600766 10680 Fern Ave, 325611 417.86 3 7 1 New Class 1
Supply, Inc. Stanton,CA 90680 Permit Issued
Pacific Image Technology,Inc. 1-021070 1875 S.Santa Cruz St, 334112 433.17(a) 4 26 7
Anaheim,CA 92805
Pacific Western Container 1-511371 4044 W.GarryAve, 322211 403.5(d) 4 12 S
Santa Ana,CA 92704
Parker Hannifin Corporation 1-141002 14300 Alton Pkwy, 332912 433.17(a) S 1 0
Irvine,CA 92618
Published as
Significantly
Non-
Patio and Door Outlet,Inc. 1-521783 410 W.FletcherAve, 332812 433.17(a) 7 30 7 Molybdenum Compliant
Orange,CA 92865
(SNC)for
Discharge
Violation(s)
Patriot Wastewater,LLC 1-521861 314 W.Freedom Ave, 562219 437.47(b) 4 28 32
(Freedom CWT) Orange,CA 92865
Patriot Wastewater,LLC 1-600147 314 W.Freedom Ave, 562219 403.5(d) 3 18 16
(Freedom Non-CWT) orange,CA 92865
Page 15 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SIUs with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
Violation
6261 Caballero Blvd, Class 1 Permit
Pepsi-Cola Bottling Group 1-031295 Buena Park,CA 312111 403.5(d) 3 9 2 Deactivated
90620
Performance Powder,Inc. 1-521805 2920 E.La Jolla St, 332812 433.17(a) 5 25 8 Molybdenum
Anaheim,CA 92806
319 20th St,
Petroprize Corporation 1-581180 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 4 22 4
CA 92648
201 2nd St,
Pier Oil Company,Inc. 1-581178 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 4 20 4
CA 92648
Pioneer Circuits,Inc. 1-011262 3010 S.Shannon St, 334412 433.17(a) 4 26 20
Santa Ana,CA 92704
1173 N.Fountain
Platinum Surface Coating,Inc. 1-521852 Way,Anaheim,CA 332813 433.17(a) 4 19 10
92806
Plegel Oil Company 1-521864 900 Mammoth Way, 211111 403.5(d) 3 15 4
(Blattner/Joe Johnson) Placentia,CA 92870
16801 Rumson St,
Plegel Oil Company-(A.H.A.) 1-021176 Yorba Linda,CA 211111 403.5(d) 3 15 4
92886
Powdercoat Services,LLC 800 N.State College
(Bldg E/Plant 1) 1-600167 Blvd,Fullerton,CA 332812 433.17(a) 4 22 8
92831
Powdercoat Services,LLC 237 N.Euclid Way,J
1-600168 Bldg,Anaheim,CA 332812 433.17(a) 4 22 7
(Bldg 1/Plant 3) 92801
Power Distribution,Inc. 1-511400 4011 W.Carriage Dr, 335311 403.5(d) 4 20 6
Santa Ana,CA 92704
Powerdrive Oil&Gas 613 16th St,
Company, LLC(16th) 1-600246 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 3 2 0
CA 92648
Powerdrive Oil&Gas 120 2nd St, New Class 1
Company, LLC(2nd) 1-600248 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 1 1 0 Permit Issued
CA 92648
Powerdrive Oil&Gas 21632 Surveyor Cir,
Company, LLC(Surveyor) 1-600245 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 3 2 0
CA 92646
Precious Metals Plating Co., 2635 Orange Ave,
1-011265 332813 433.17(a) 4 27 8
Inc. Santa Ana,CA 92707
Precision Anodizing&Plating, 1-521809 1601 N.Miller St, 332813 433.17(a) 4 36 20
Inc. I Anaheim,CA 92806
Page 16 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SIUs with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
Violation
Precision Circuits West,Inc. 11-011008 3310 W.Harvard St, 13344121 433.17(a) 4 23 8
Santa Ana,CA 92704
Precision Resource,California
5803 Engineer St,
1-111002 Huntington Beach, 332710 403.5(d) 4 22 4
Division CA 92649
Precon,Inc. 1-021581 3131 E.La Palma Ave, 332721 403.5(d) 5 27 20 Copper
Anaheim,CA 92806
Published as
Significantly
6237 Descanso Cir, Non-
Prima-Tex Industries Inc. 1-031036 Buena Park,CA 313310 403.5(d) 5 13 7 Zinc Compliant
90620 (SNC)for
Discharge
Violation(s)
Prudential Overall Supply 1-071235 16901 Aston St, 812332 403.5(d) 4 24 7
Irvine,CA 92606
Pulmuone Wildwood,Inc. 1-531397 2315 Moore Ave, 311991 403.5(d) 4 17 1
Fullerton,CA 92833
Q-Flex Inc. 1-600337 1301 E.Hunter Ave, 334418 433.17(a) 4 18 9
Santa Ana,CA 92705
Quality Aluminum Forge, LLC 1-521833 814 N.Cypress St, 332112 467.45 4 20 10
(Cypress North) Orange,CA 92867
Quality Aluminum Forge, LLC 1-600272 794 N.Cypress St, 332112 467.46 4 29 10
(Cypress South) Orange,CA 92867
Quikturn Professional 1-521858 567 S.Melrose St, 333249 403.5(d) 4 18 4
Screenprinting Placentia,CA 92870
Railmakers,Inc. 1-061138 864 W.18th St,Costa 332323 433.17(a) 1 6 4 Class 1 Permit
Mesa,CA 92627 Deactivated
Rayne Dealership Corporation 1-571303 17835 Sky Park Cir,M 454390 403.5(d) 4 20 2
Ste,Irvine,CA 92614
RBC Transport Dynamics 3131 W.Segerstrom
1-011013 Ave,Santa Ana,CA 336413 433.17(a) 3 17 8
Corp. 92704
Reid Metal Finishing 1-511376 3110 W.Harvard St, 332813 433.17(a) 4 29 30
Santa Ana,CA 92704
219 1st St,
Remora Operating CA,LLC 1-581192 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 4 21 4
CA 92648
Page 17 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SILls with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status
Violation
Published as
Significantly
2727 Coronado St, Cadmium, Non-
Republic Waste Services 1-521827 Anaheim,CA 92806 56211 403.5(d) 5 33 5 Copper,Lead, Compliant
Zinc (SNC)for
Discharge
Violation(s)
Republic Waste Services of 1-021169 1235 N.Blue Gum St, 562111 403.5(d) 4 23 5
So.Cal.,LLC Anaheim,CA 92806
3401 W.Segerstrom
Rich Products Corp. 1-511404 Ave,Santa Ana,CA 311812 403.5(d) 4 16 4
92704
Rigiflex Technology,Inc. 1-021187 1166 N.Grove St, 334418 433.17(a) 4 30 7
Anaheim,CA 92806
Robinson Pharma,Inc. 1-511413 2632 S.Croddy Way, 325411 439.47 4 0 0
(Croddy) Santa Ana,CA 92704
Robinson Pharma,Inc. 1-600126 2811 S.Harbor Blvd, 325412 439.47 4 22 18
(Harbor North) Santa Ana,CA 92704
Robinson Pharma,Inc. 1-511412 3330 S.Harbor Blvd, 325412 439.47 4 22 22
(Harbor South) Santa Ana,CA 92704
Rolls-Royce HTC 1-600212 5730 Katella Ave, 541712 403.5(d) 4 11 7
Cypress,CA 90630
Rolls-Royce HTC(fume 1-600213 5730 Katella Ave, 541712 403.5(d) 4 15 4
scrubber) Cypress,CA 90630
712 N.Valley St,B
Roto-Die Company, Inc. 1-021033 Ste,Anaheim,CA 332710 433.17(a) 4 30 7
92801
114 14th St,
Rountree/Wright 1-111028 12&14/113 LotBlk, 211111 403.5(d) 3 16 4
Enterprises,LLC Huntington Beach,
CA 92648
18742 Goldenwest
S&C Oil Co., Inc. 1-581175 St,Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 4 23 4
CA 92649
Safran Electronics&Defense, 3184 Pullman St,
1-571304 Costa Mesa,CA 335931 433.17(a) 5 28 10 Zinc
Avionics USA,LLC. 92626
2955 Airway Ave,
Sanmina Corporation(Airway) 1-061008 Costa Mesa,CA 334412 433.17(a) 4 27 20
92626
Page 18 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SILls with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
Violation
2950 Red Hill Ave,
Sanmina Corporation(Redhill) 1-061009 Costa Mesa,CA 334412 433.17(a) 4 27 20
92626
Santana Services 1-021016 1224 E.Ash Ave, 332813 433.17(a) 4 18 8
Fullerton,CA 92831
1901 Via Burton
Schreiber Foods,Inc. 1-021049 None,Fullerton,CA 311511 403.5(d) 4 9 2
92831
Scientific Spray Finishes,Inc. 1-031311 315 S.Richman Ave, 332812 433.17(a) 4 22 8
Fullerton,CA 92832
333 Mccormick Ave,
Semicoa 1-571313 Costa Mesa,CA 334413 469.18(a) 3 22 10
92626
Serrano Water District 1-021137 5454 Taft Ave, 221310 403.5(d) 4 26 1
Orange,CA 92867
SFPP, LP 1-021619 1350 N.Main St, 493190 403.5(d) 2 5 2
Orange,CA 92867
Shepard Bros., Inc. 1-031034 503 S.Cypress St,La 325611 417.166,417.176 4 22 4
Habra,CA 90631
Shur-Lok Company 1-600297 2541 White Rd, 332722 433.17(a) 4 1 0
Irvine,CA 92614
6535 Caballero Blvd, Class 1 Permit
Simply Fresh Foods,Inc. 1-531426 Buena Park,CA 311421 403.5(d) 2 10 S Deactivated
90620
6535 Caballero Blvd, New Class 1
Simply Fresh,LLC 1-600709 Buena Park,CA 311421 403.5(d) 2 11 6 Permit Issued
90620
5312 System Dr, New Class 1
Sirco Industrial, Inc. 1-600706 Huntington Beach, 423830 403.5(d) 2 11 3
Permit Issued
CA 92649
17905 Metzler Ln,
Soldermask,Inc. 1-031341 Huntington Beach, 334412 433.17(a) 4 26 20
CA 92647
South Coast Baking,LLC 1-600565 1711 Kettering St, 311821 403.5(d) 4 22 3 New Class 1
Irvine,CA 92614 Permit Issued
South Coast Circuits,Inc. 3500 W.Lake Center
1-011069 Dr,A unit,Santa Ana, 334412 433.17(a) 4 34 20
(Bldg 3500 A) CA 92704
South Coast Circuits,Inc. 3506 W.Lake Center
(Bldg 3506 A) 1-011030 Dr,A Bldg,Santa Ana, 334412 433.17(a) 4 24 8
CA 92704
Page 19 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SIUs with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
Violation
South Coast Circuits,Inc. 13512 W.Lake Center
1-511365 Dr,A Unit,Santa Ana, 334412 433.17(a) 4 34 20
(Bldg 3512 A) CA 92704
3524 W.Lake Center
South Coast Circuits,Inc. 1-011054 Dr,A Unit,Santa Ana, 334412 433.17(a) 4 26 8
(Bldg 3524 A) CA 92704
South Coast Water 1-511405 401 S.Santa Fe St, 333318 403.5(d) 4 15 4
Santa Ana,CA 92705
Southern California Edison#1 7301 Fenwick Ln,
1-031014 Westminster,CA 811310 403.5(d) 4 15 2
(Mt) 92683
Southern California Edison#2 7351 Fenwick Ln,
(Das) 1-031015 Westminster,CA 811310 403.5(d) 4 17 2
92683
Southern California Edison#3 7455 Fenwick Ln,
1-031016 Westminster,CA 811310 403.5(d) 4 15 2
(Lars) 92683
SPS Technologies 1-011310 2701 S.Harbor Blvd, 332722 433.17(a),471.34(a) 4 30 33
Santa Ana,CA 92704
SPS Technologies LLC,DBA 1224 E.Warner Ave, 433.17(a),467.46, Formerly listed
Cherry Aerospace Santa Ana,CA 92705 471.34(a),471.65(a)
1-511381 332722 6 35 40 cadmium as cherry
Aerospace
Stainless Micro-Polish,Inc. 1-021672 1286 N.Grove St, 332813 433.17(a) 4 31 8
Anaheim,CA 92806
Published as
Significantly
Star Manufacturing LLC,dba 341 W.Collins Ave, Non- New Class 1
1-600653 332119 403.5(d) 2 5 4 O&G min. Compliant
Commercial Metal Forming Orange,CA 92867 (SNC)for Permit Issued
Discharge
Violation(s)
7601 Park Ave,
Star Powder Coating,Inc. 1-531425 Garden Grove,CA 332812 433.17(a) 4 22 8
92841
Statek Corporation(Main) 1-021664 512 N.Main St, 334419 469.26(a) 5 35 6
Orange,CA 92868
Statek Corporation(Orange 1449 W.Orange
Grove) 1-521777 Grove Ave,B Unit, 334419 469.28(a) 4 31 1
Orange,CA 92868
Stepan Company 1-021674 1208 N.Patt St, 325613 417.106,417.96 6 19 9
Anaheim,CA 92801
Page 20 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SIUs with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status
Violation
4002 Westminster
Stremicks Heritage Foods,LLC 1-021028 Ave,Santa Ana,CA 311511 403.5(d) 4 21 2
92703
Summit Interconnect,Inc. 1-600012 223 N.Crescent Way, 334412 433.17(a) 4 31 20
Anaheim,CA 92801
Summit Interconnect,Inc., 1-600060 230 W.Bristol Ln, 334412 433.17(a) 4 34 20
Orange Division Orange,CA 92865
Sunny Delight Beverages Co. 1-021045 1230 N.Tustin Ave, 312111 403.5(d) 3 15 2
Anaheim,CA 92807
Superior Plating 1-021090 1901 E.Cerritos Ave, 332813 433.17(a) 4 34 20
Anaheim,CA 92805
Superior Processing 1-021403 1115 Las Brisas PI, 334412 433.17(a) 4 20 8
Placentia,CA 92870
Tayco Engineering,Inc. 1-031012 10874 Hope St, 334513 433.17(a) 5 21 7 Copper
Cypress,CA 90630
Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing 1-021123 2114 Ball Rd, 333924 433.17(a) 4 24 12 Zinc
Company Anaheim,CA 92804
TC Cosmotronic,Inc.,DBA 1-571309 334412 433.17(a) 0 0 2 16721 Noyes Ave, Class 1 Permit
Cosmotronic Irvine,CA 92606 Deactivated
1571 S.Sunkist St,H Class 1 Permit
Techplate,Inc. 1-021082 Ste,Anaheim,CA 332813 433.17(a) 1 0 0 Deactivated
92806
Teva Parenteral Medicines, 1-141007 19 Hughes Unk, 325412 439.47 4 11 10
Inc. Irvine,CA 92618
Thermal-Vac Technology,Inc. 1-021282 1221 W.StruckAve, 332410 433.17(a) 4 26 20
Orange,CA 92867
Thompson Energy Resources, 1-521773 3351 E.Birch St,Brea, 211111 403.5(d) 5 31 6 O&G min.
LLC CA 92821
Timken Bearing Inspection, 4422 Corporate
1-531415 Center Dr,Los 336412 433.17(a) 4 17 6
Inc. Alamitos,CA 90720
15701 Industry Ln,
Tiodize Company,Inc. 1-111132 Huntington Beach, 332813 433.17(a) 4 20 20
CA 92649
Toyota Racing Development 1-071059 335 Baker St,Costa 336310 403.5(d) 4 16 36
Mesa,CA 92626
1106 S.Technology
Transline Technology,Inc. 1-021202 Cir,Anaheim,CA 334412 433.17(a) 4 26 8
192805
Tropitone Furniture Co.,Inc. 1-141163 5 Marconi Unk, 337124 433.17(a) 4 15 7
Irvine,CA 92618
Page 21 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SIUs with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status
Violation
Formerly listed
TTM Technologies North 1-521859 3140 E.Coronado St, 334412 433.17(a) 4 32 48 Copper as Viasystems
America,LLC.(Coronado) Anaheim,CA 92806 Technologies
Corporation,LLC
TTM Technologies North 1-511366 2645 Croddy Way, 334412 433.17(a) S 41 20
America,LLC.(Croddy) Santa Ana,CA 92704
TTM Technologies North 1-511359 2640 S.Harbor Blvd, 334412 433.17(a) 4 34 20
America,LLC.(Harbor) Santa Ana,CA 92704
Ultra-Pure Metal Finishing, 1-021703 1764 N.Case St, 332813 433.17(a) 5 32 20 Zinc
Inc. Orange,CA 92865
United Pharma, LLC 1-531418 2317 Moore Ave, 325412 403.5(d) 5 17 4
Fullerton,CA 92833
Universal Alloy Corp. 1-021706 2871 La Mesa Ave, 331318 467.35(c) 4 23 10
Anaheim,CA 92806
1551 E.Orangethorpe
Universal Molding Co. 1-521836 Ave,Fullerton,CA 332812 433.17(a) 4 29 8
92831
2100 E.Orangethorpe
UOP,LLC 1-521751 Ave,Anaheim,CA 326113 403.5(d) 3 11 4
92806
Van Law Food Products, Inc. 1-531439 2325 Moore Ave, 311941 403.5(d) 4 16 2 Class 1 Permit
Fullerton,CA 92833 Deactivated
2325 Moore Ave, New Class 1
Van Law Food Products, Inc. 1-600810 Fullerton,CA 92833 311941 403.5(d) 0 0 0 Permit Issued
Vi-Cal Metals,Inc. 1-521846 Anaheim,CA 928 1400 N.Baxter28 06 562920 403.5(d) 4 12 6
Vit-Best Nutrition,Inc. 1-600010 12832 Dow Ave, 325411 439.47 5 24 14
Tustin,CA 92780
Weber Precision Graphics 1-011354 2730 Shannon St, 323113 403.5(d) 3 17 2
Santa Ana,CA 92704
Weidemann Water 1-021653 1702 E.Rosslynn Ave, 333318 403.5(d) 4 21 4
Conditioners,Inc. Fullerton,CA 92831
1080 W.17th St,
West Newport Oil Company 1-061110 Costa Mesa,CA 211111 403.5(d) 4 23 16
92627
Western Yarn Dyeing, Inc. 1-031114 2011 Raymer Ave, 313110 403.5(d) 3 13 9 Class 1 Permit
Fullerton,CA 92833 Deactivated
Wilco-Placentia Oil Operator, 1-521829 550 Richfield Rd, 211111 403.5(d) 4 17 4
LLC Placentia,CA 92870
Winonics(Brea) 1-031035 660 N.Puente St, 334412 433.17(a) 2 13 17
Brea,CA 92821
Page 22 of 23
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2018-2019 List of SILls with Monitoring& Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutants) SNC
Facility No. Code Inspections Samples Samples Status Address Regulation in Discharge Comment
Violation
1257 State College
Winonics,Inc. 1-021735 Blvd,Fullerton,CA 334412 433.17(a) 4 24 20
92831
17235 Newhope St,
Yakult USA,Inc. 1-521850 Fountain Valley,CA 311511 403.5(d) 4 21 12
92708
Page 23 of 23
appendix b
SUMMARY OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS AND
TRACE CONSTITUENTS ANALYSES
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutant Summary, Fiscal Year 2018/19
MONITORING ANALYSIS TOT AVG UNITS Flow Mass
LOCATION CONC (MGD) (lbs/day)
EFF-001 Ag ND pg/L 104 ND
EFF-001 As 2.15 pg/L 104 1.87
EFF-001 Be ND pg/L 104 ND
EFF-001 CN 7.57 pg/L 104 6.59
EFF-001 Cd ND pg/L 104 ND
EFF-001 Cr 0.829 pg/L 104 0.722
EFF-001 Cu 3.69 pg/L 104 3.21
EFF-001 Hg 4.73 ng/L 104 0.004
EFF-001 Ni 8.39 pg/L 104 7.31
EFF-001 ORG 13.5 Ng/L 104 11.8
EFF-001 Pb 0.061 pg/L 104 0.053
EFF-001 Sb 1.18 Ng/L 104 1.03
EFF-001 Se 6.12 pg/L 104 5.33
EFF-001 TI ND pg/L 104 ND
EFF-001 Zn 23.4 pg/L 104 20.4
INF-001 Ag 1.11 Ng/L 120 1.11
INF-001 As 2.36 pg/L 120 2.35
INF-001 Be ND Ng/L 120 ND
INF-001 CN 0.897 pg/L 120 0.894
INF-001 Cd 0.351 pg/L 120 0.350
INF-001 Cr 5.65 pg/L 120 5.63
INF-001 Cu 95.0 pg/L 120 94.7
INF-001 Hg 146 ng/L 120 0.146
INF-001 Ni 8.73 pg/L 120 8.70
INF-001 ORG 35.2 pg/L 120 35.1
INF-001 Pb 2.60 pg/L 120 2.59
INF-001 Sb 1.36 pg/L 120 1.36
INF-001 Se 2.57 pg/L 120 2.56
INF-001 TI ND Ng/L 120 ND
INF-001 Zn 156 pg/L 120 155
1 N F-002 Ag 1.48 Ng/L 71.3 0.880
1 N F-002 As 4.11 pg/L 71.3 2.44
INF-002 Be ND pg/L 71.3 ND
INF-002 CN 2.09 pg/L 71.3 1.24
INF-002 Cd 1.28 Ng/L 71.3 0.761
INF-002 Cr 10.4 pg/L 71.3 6.19
INF-002 Cu 119 Ng/L 71.3 70.8
INF-002 Hg 147 ng/L 71.3 0.088
INF-002 Ni 12.7 pg/L 71.3 7.55
INF-002 ORG 21.6 pg/L 71.3 12.9
INF-002 Pb 2.98 pg/L 71.3 1.77
INF-002 Sb 1.33 Ng/L 71.3 0.791
INF-002 Se 6.72 Ng/L 71.3 4.00
INF-002 TI ND Ng/L 71.3 ND
INF-002 Zn 200 Ng/L 71.3 119
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2018/19
MONITORING NAME Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-08 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19
LOCATION
EFF-001 Silver ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Arsenic 2.38 pg/L 2.89 pg/L 1.53 pg/L 1.21 pg/L 2.58 pg/L 2.21 pg/L 2.39 pg/L 1.90 pg/L 2.22 pg/L 2.14 pg/L 1.36 pg/L 2.97 pg/L
Beryllium ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Cadmium ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Cyanide 5.03 pg/L 3.92 pg/L 3.08 pg/L 5.85 pg/L 4.64 pg/L 4.70 pg/L 3.91 pg/L 4.03 pg/L 4.19 pg/L 2.43 pg/L 44 pg/L 5.06 pg/L
Chromium 0.930 pg/L 1.07 pg/L 0.640 pg/L 0.610 pg/L 0.880 pg/L 0.970 pg/L 0.880 pg/L 0.640 pg/L 0.740 pg/L 0.970 pg/L 0.670 pg/L 0.950 pg/L
Copper 2.80 pg/L 2.80 pg/L 2.04 pg/L 2.46 pg/L 4.11 pg/L 4.78 pg/L 4.80 pg/L 4.62 pg/L 3.60 pg/L 6.07 pg/L 2.47 pg/L 3.75 pg/L
Mercury 5.1 ng/L 4 ng/L 3.5 ng/L 3.4 ng/L 5.8 ng/L 3.8 ng/L 5 ng/L 6.4 ng/L 4.31 ng/L 7.1 ng/L 3.4 ng/L 4.9 ng/L
Nickel 8.91 pg/L 9.46 pg/L 6.24 pg/L 5.52 pg/L 9.49 pg/L 10.7 pg/L 8.61 pg/L 8.68 pg/L 8.45 pg/L 10.5 pg/L 5.14 pg/L 8.97 pg/L
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,1-Dichloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,2-Dichloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,2-Dichloropropane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-P-Dioxin ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dichlorophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2-Chloronapthalene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2-Chlorophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2-Nitrophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2-Chloroethylvinylether ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
4-Bromophenyl-Phenyl Ether ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2018/19
MONITORING NAME Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-08 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19
LOCATION
4-Chlorophenyl-Phenyl Ether ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
4-Nitrophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Acenaphthene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Acenaphthylene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Aldrin ND pg/L ND pg/L
Anthracene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo (a)Anthracene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzidine ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo (a) Pyrene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo (b) Fluoranthene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo (k) Fluoranthene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Chlordane ND pg/L ND pg/L
Chrysene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Di-n-Butyl Phthalate ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Di-n-Octyl Phthalate ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Dibenzo (a,h)Anthracene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Dieldrin ND pg/L ND pg/L
Diethylphthalate ND pg/L 0.760 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Dimethylphthalate ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan I ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan II ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan Sulfate ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endrin ND pg/L ND pg/L
Fluroanthene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Fluorene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Heptachlor ND pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachlorobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachlorobutadiene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
HexachIorocyclo pentad iene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2018/19
MONITORING NAME Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-08 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19
LOCATION
Hexachloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Isophorone ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Nitrobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1016 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1221 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1232 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1242 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1248 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1254 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1260 ND pg/L ND pg/L
Pentachlorophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Phenanthrene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Phenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Pyrene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Acrolein ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Acrylonitrile ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Alpha-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Beta-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 0.860 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L 3.90 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L 1.63 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bromodichloromethane 1.61 pg/L 3.53 pg/L ND pg/L 2.07 pg/L 6.34 pg/L 4.34 pg/L 5.83 pg/L 3.42 pg/L 6.54 pg/L 5.06 pg/L ND pg/L 3.71 pg/L
Bromoform ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bromomethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Carbon Tetrachloride ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Chlorobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Chloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Chloroform 7.25 pg/L 8.26 pg/L ND pg/L 4.87 pg/L 12.7 pg/L 10.5 pg/L 11.2 pg/L 7.63 pg/L 10.8 pg/L 9.09 pg/L 4.29 pg/L 8.06 pg/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Delta-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Dibromochloromethane ND pg/L 1.52 pg/L ND pg/L 0.760 pg/L 2.33 pg/L 1.34 pg/L 2.27 pg/L 1.18 pg/L 2.30 pg/L 1.87 pg/L ND pg/L 1.20 pg/L
3
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2018/19
MONITORING NAME Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-08 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19
LOCATION
Ethylbenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Gamma-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Methylene Chloride 1.30 pg/L 1.20 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L 0.900 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
N-Nitrosodiprophylamine ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDD ND pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDE ND pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDT ND pg/L ND pg/L
Tetrachloroethene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Toluene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Trichloroethene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Vinyl Chloride ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Lead ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L 0.620 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L 0.110 pg/L ND pg/L
Antimony 1.36 pg/L 1.14 pg/L 0.590 pg/L 0.610 pg/L 1.70 pg/L 1.73 pg/L 1.47 pg/L 1.18 pg/L 1.01 pg/L 1.29 pg/L 0.580 pg/L 1.54 pg/L
Selenium 7.08 pg/L 7.52 pg/L 3.76 pg/L 3.01 pg/L 6.67 pg/L 5.80 pg/L 5.62 pg/L 8.27 pg/L 7.27 pg/L 8.11 pg/L 3.85 pg/L 6.49 pg/L
Thallium ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Zinc 23.7 pg/L 20.7 pg/L 14.3 pg/L 12.5 pg/L 28.5 pg/L 28.0 pg/L 28.3 pg/L 26.0 pg/L 25.6 pg/L 30.2 pg/L 14.6 pg/L 28.0 pg/L
INF-001 Silver 1.05 pg/L 1.18 pg/L 0.830 pg/L 1.34 pg/L 1.08 pg/L 0.950 pg/L 0.860 pg/L 1.36 pg/L 1.12 pg/L 1.05 pg/L 0.700 pg/L 1.83 pg/L
Arsenic 2.40 pg/L 2.49 pg/L 2.32 pg/L 2.05 pg/L 2.52 pg/L 2.13 pg/L 2.24 pg/L 3.04 pg/L 2.33 pg/L 2.23 pg/L 2.10 pg/L 2.42 pg/L
Beryllium ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Cadmium 0.430 pg/L 0.390 pg/L 0.330 pg/L 0.320 pg/L 0.380 pg/L 0.450 pg/L 0.330 pg/L 0.330 pg/L 0.390 pg/L 0.300 pg/L 0.230 pg/L 0.330 pg/L
Cyanide 2.26 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L 1.36 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L 1.86 pg/L ND pg/L 2.7 pg/L 2.58 pg/L
Chromium 5.65 pg/L 6.20 pg/L 8.19 pg/L 7.02 pg/L 4.42 pg/L 4.86 pg/L 5.57 pg/L 4.70 pg/L 4.65 pg/L 5.12 pg/L 5.89 pg/L 5.58 pg/L
Copper 97.5 pg/L 102 pg/L 101 pg/L 99.8 pg/L 90.5 pg/L 83.9 pg/L 90.9 pg/L 98.2 pg/L 88.1 pg/L 93.4 pg/L 95.4 pg/L 99.6 pg/L
Mercury 140 ng/L 140 ng/L 150 ng/L 74 ng/L 200 ng/L 100 ng/L 100 ng/L 201 ng/L 118 ng/L 160 ng/L 210 ng/L 160 ng/L
Nickel 9.68 pg/L 11.5 pg/L 9.16 pg/L 8.58 pg/L 7.40 pg/L 8.45 pg/L 9.59 pg/L 8.38 pg/L 6.67 pg/L 8.47 pg/L 8.22 pg/L 8.63 pg/L
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,1-Dichloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
4
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2018/19
MONITORING NAME Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-08 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19
LOCATION
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,2-Dichloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,2-Dichloropropane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dichlorophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2-Chloronapthalene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2-Chlorophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2-Nitrophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2-Chloroethylvinylether ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
4-Bromophenyl-Phenyl Ether ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol ND pg/L ND pg/L 3.62 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
4-Chlorophenyl-Phenyl Ether ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
4-Nitrophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Acenaphthene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Acenaphthylene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Aldrin ND pg/L ND pg/L
Anthracene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo (a)Anthracene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzidine ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo (a) Pyrene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo (b) Fluoranthene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo (k) Fluoranthene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate 2.07 pg/L 2.01 pg/L 2.13 pg/L 1.61 pg/L 3.06 pg/L 1.76 pg/L 1.27 pg/L 1.65 pg/L 1.63 pg/L 1.13 pg/L 1.13 pg/L 1.38 pg/L
5
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2018/19
MONITORING NAME Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-08 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19
LOCATION
Chlordane ND pg/L ND pg/L
Chrysene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Di-n-Butyl Phthalate 1.01 pg/L 1.32 pg/L 1.34 pg/L 1.20 pg/L 1.35 pg/L 1.46 pg/L 1.12 pg/L 0.960 pg/L 0.780 pg/L 0.820 pg/L 1.20 pg/L 1.11 pg/L
Di-n-Octyl Phthalate ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Dibenzo (a,h)Anthracene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Dieldrin ND pg/L ND pg/L
Diethylphthalate 4.04 pg/L 3.09 pg/L 3.11 pg/L 2.62 pg/L 7.95 pg/L 3.70 pg/L 3.63 pg/L 2.65 pg/L 2.22 pg/L 1.78 pg/L 2.87 pg/L 2.77 pg/L
Dimethylphthalate ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan I ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan II ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan Sulfate ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endrin ND pg/L ND pg/L
Fluroanthene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Fluorene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Heptachlor ND pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachlorobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachlorobutadiene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachlorocyclo pentad iene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Isophorone ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Nitrobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1016 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1221 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1232 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1242 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1248 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1254 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1260 ND pg/L ND pg/L
Pentachlorophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Phenanthrene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Phenol 13.4 pg/L 18.1 pg/L 14.1 pg/L 14.1 pg/L 16.4 pg/L 15.5 pg/L 15.2 pg/L 10.6 pg/L 12.9 pg/L 13.6 pg/L 18.0 pg/L 18.2 pg/L
6
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2018/19
MONITORING NAME Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-08 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19
LOCATION
Pyrene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Acrolein ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Acrylonitrile ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Alpha-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Beta-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 7.95 pg/L 5.97 pg/L 7.44 pg/L 6.64 pg/L 11.6 pg/L 8.07 pg/L 7.97 pg/L 4.65 pg/L 5.35 pg/L 4.58 pg/L 6.90 pg/L 8.19 pg/L
Bromodichloromethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bromoform ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bromomethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Carbon Tetrachloride ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Chlorobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Chloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Chloroform 2.85 pg/L 3.33 pg/L 2.99 pg/L 2.93 pg/L 3.21 pg/L 2.89 pg/L 2.69 pg/L 2.90 pg/L 1.83 pg/L 2.84 pg/L 2.20 pg/L 4.33 pg/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Delta-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Dibromochloromethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Ethylbenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Gamma-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Methylene Chloride 2.40 pg/L ND pg/L 15.4 pg/L 5.00 pg/L 2.50 pg/L ND pg/L 2.10 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L 5.40 pg/L 1.10 pg/L ND pg/L
N-Nitrosodiprophylamine ND ng/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND ng/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND ng/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
N-Nitrosodimethylamine 56.0 ng/L ND pg/L ND pg/L 35.0 ng/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L 152 ng/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND ng/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND ng/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND ng/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDD ND pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDE ND pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDT ND pg/L ND pg/L
Tetrachloroethene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Toluene ND pg/L 1.75 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L 1.60 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L 2.36 pg/L 1.50 pg/L ND pg/L 2.16 pg/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Trichloroethene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
7
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2018/19
MONITORING NAME Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-08 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19
LOCATION
Vinyl Chloride ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Lead 2.11 pg/L 2.13 pg/L 2.29 pg/L 2.24 pg/L 2.06 pg/L 2.11 pg/L 2.88 pg/L 5.53 pg/L 2.87 pg/L 1.99 pg/L 1.99 pg/L 2.96 pg/L
Antimony 1.62 pg/L 0.880 pg/L 1.31 pg/L 1.32 pg/L 1.76 pg/L 1.79 pg/L 1.19 pg/L 1.25 pg/L 1.10 pg/L 1.55 pg/L 1.10 pg/L 1.42 pg/L
Selenium 2.83 pg/L 2.43 pg/L 2.46 pg/L 2.63 pg/L 2.42 pg/L 2.44 pg/L 2.02 pg/L 3.52 pg/L 2.48 pg/L 3.30 pg/L 2.77 pg/L 1.50 pg/L
Thallium ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Zinc 165 pg/L 172 pg/L 159 pg/L 186 pg/L 161 pg/L 150 pg/L 152 pg/L 127 pg/L 132 pg/L 155 pg/L 151 pg/L 166 pg/L
INF-002 Silver 0.890 pg/L 1.91 pg/L 1.25 pg/L 1.80 pg/L 1.68 pg/L 1.10 pg/L 0.980 pg/L 0.920 pg/L 0.930 pg/L 0.790 pg/L 4.29 pg/L 1.25 pg/L
Arsenic 3.25 pg/L 4.68 pg/L 4.14 pg/L 3.87 pg/L 4.36 pg/L 3.82 pg/L 4.29 pg/L 4.18 pg/L 3.55 pg/L 3.37 pg/L 5.80 pg/L 4.04 pg/L
Beryllium ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Cadmium 0.420 pg/L 0.730 pg/L 0.840 pg/L 0.540 pg/L 1.21 pg/L 0.770 pg/L 0.920 pg/L 0.910 pg/L 0.580 pg/L 0.530 pg/L 6.11 pg/L 1.80 pg/L
Cyanide 2.90 pg/L 1.25 pg/L 3.23 pg/L ND pg/L 3.49 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L 1.25 pg/L 2.08 pg/L ND pg/L 8.2 pg/L 2.64 pg/L
Chromium 6.40 pg/L 10.4 pg/L 11.2 pg/L 11.1 pg/L 12.1 pg/L 7.75 pg/L 8.17 pg/L 8.61 pg/L 7.25 pg/L 7.51 pg/L 25.8 pg/L 8.67 pg/L
Copper 67.3 pg/L 126 pg/L 122 pg/L 112 pg/L 143 pg/L 96.4 pg/L 110 pg/L 97.6 pg/L 81.2 pg/L 84.0 pg/L 279 pg/L 113 pg/L
Mercury 120 ng/L 120 ng/L 120 ng/L 80 ng/L 170 ng/L 130 ng/L 130 ng/L 121 ng/L 148 ng/L 140 ng/L 360 ng/L 130 ng/L
Nickel 8.41 pg/L 12.5 pg/L 21.6 pg/L 9.57 pg/L 18.8 pg/L 9.21 pg/L 9.23 pg/L 11.5 pg/L 8.62 pg/L 12.5 pg/L 21.1 pg/L 9.45 pg/L
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,1-Dichloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,2-Dichloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,2-Dichloropropane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dichlorophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2-Chloronapthalene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2-Chlorophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2-Nitrophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
8
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2018/19
MONITORING NAME Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-08 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19
LOCATION
2-Chloroethylvinylether ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
4-Bromophenyl-Phenyl Ether ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
4-Chlorophenyl-Phenyl Ether ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
4-Nitrophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Acenaphthene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Acenaphthylene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Aldrin ND pg/L ND pg/L
Anthracene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo (a)Anthracene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzidine ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo (a) Pyrene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo (b) Fluoranthene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo (k) Fluoranthene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate 2.37 pg/L 1.89 pg/L 1.94 pg/L 1.29 pg/L 3.32 pg/L ND pg/L 0.950 pg/L 1.38 pg/L 1.74 pg/L 1.16 pg/L 1.08 pg/L 1.14 pg/L
Chlordane ND pg/L ND pg/L
Chrysene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Di-n-Butyl Phthalate 0.850 pg/L 1.33 pg/L 1.45 pg/L 0.950 pg/L 1.18 pg/L 1.27 pg/L 0.670 pg/L 0.710 pg/L 0.660 pg/L 0.740 pg/L 0.770 pg/L 0.680 pg/L
Di-n-Octyl Phthalate ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Dibenzo (a,h)Anthracene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Dieldrin ND pg/L ND pg/L
Diethylphthalate 2.22 pg/L 1.61 pg/L 2.55 pg/L 1.55 pg/L 2.96 pg/L 1.96 pg/L 1.78 pg/L 1.59 pg/L 1.28 pg/L 1.33 pg/L 2.31 pg/L 1.70 pg/L
Dimethylphthalate ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan I ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan II ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan Sulfate ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endrin ND pg/L ND pg/L
Fluroanthene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
9
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2018/19
MONITORING NAME Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-08 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19
LOCATION
Fluorene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Heptachlor ND pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachlorobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachlorobutadiene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachlorocyclo pentad iene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Isophorone ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Nitrobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1016 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1221 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1232 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1242 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1248 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1254 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB - 1260 ND pg/L ND pg/L
Pentachlorophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Phenanthrene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Phenol 3.12 pg/L 2.12 pg/L 1.19 pg/L 4.57 pg/L 2.74 pg/L 3.37 pg/L 4.66 pg/L 4.45 pg/L 4.59 pg/L 7.12 pg/L 6.90 pg/L 6.54 pg/L
Pyrene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Acrolein ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Acrylonitrile ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Alpha-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Beta-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 8.82 pg/L 9.33 pg/L 12.9 pg/L 5.18 pg/L 13.5 pg/L 8.13 pg/L 6.05 pg/L 4.15 pg/L 4.18 pg/L 5.59 pg/L 7.81 pg/L 5.09 pg/L
Bromodichloromethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bromoform ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bromomethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Carbon Tetrachloride ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Chlorobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
10
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2018/19
MONITORING NAME Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-08 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19
LOCATION
Chloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Chloroform 2.32 pg/L 2.73 pg/L 1.17 pg/L 2.80 pg/L 2.49 pg/L 3.65 pg/L 4.18 pg/L 2.80 pg/L 2.20 pg/L 2.68 pg/L 1.95 pg/L 2.54 pg/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Delta-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Dibromochloromethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Ethylbenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Gamma-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Methylene Chloride ND pg/L 4.30 pg/L 1.30 pg/L 2.40 pg/L 2.60 pg/L 1.90 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L 4.10 pg/L 2.10 pg/L 1.60 pg/L ND pg/L
N-Nitrosodiprophylamine ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDD ND pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDE ND pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDT ND pg/L ND pg/L
Tetrachloroethene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Toluene 1.99 pg/L 1.63 pg/L 1.93 pg/L 4.52 pg/L ND pg/L 1.59 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L 1.95 pg/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Trichloroethene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Vinyl Chloride ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Lead 1.65 pg/L 2.97 pg/L 3.08 pg/L 2.81 pg/L 3.36 pg/L 2.37 pg/L 3.19 pg/L 2.90 pg/L 2.20 pg/L 2.43 pg/L 6.23 pg/L 2.52 pg/L
Antimony 1.08 pg/L 1.20 pg/L 1.14 pg/L 1.13 pg/L 1.56 pg/L 1.21 pg/L 2.04 pg/L 1.16 pg/L 0.980 pg/L 1.18 pg/L 1.67 pg/L 1.60 pg/L
Selenium 6.33 pg/L 7.59 pg/L 6.56 pg/L 6.03 pg/L 6.75 pg/L 6.78 pg/L 5.69 pg/L 7.11 pg/L 6.67 pg/L 6.59 pg/L 8.01 pg/L 6.58 pg/L
Thallium ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Zinc 115 pg/L 223 pg/L 206 pg/L 198 pg/L 238 pg/L 185 pg/L 178 pg/L 161 pg/L 151 pg/L 142 pg/L 432 pg/L 176 pg/L
11
appendix c
PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
PRIORITY POLLUTANTS LIST
Elements Purgeable Organic Compounds Base/Neutral Extractable Organic
(EPA Method 624) Compounds (Continued)
Antimony
Arsenic Acrolein Butyl Benzyl Phthalate
Beryllium Acrylonitrile 2-Chloronaphthalene
Cadmium Benzene 4-Chlorophenyl-Phenyl Ether
Chromium Bromomethane Chrysene
Copper Bromodichloromethane Dibenzo (a,h)Anthracene
Lead Bromoform Di-N-Butyl Phthalate
Mercury Carbon Tetrachloride 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Nickel Chlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Selenium 2-Chloroethylvinylether 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Silver Chloroform 3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
Thallium Chloromethane Diethylphthalate
Zinc Dibromochloromethane Dimethylphthalate
1,1-Dichloroethane 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Other Constituents 1,2-Dichloroethane 2,6-Dinitrotoluene
1,1-Dichloroethene Di-N-Octyl Phthalate
Asbestos Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
Cyanide 1,2-Dichloropropene Fluroanthene
Cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Fluorene
Pesticides and PCB's Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Hexachlorobenzene
(EPA Method 608) Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene
Methylene Chloride Hexachloroethane
Aldrin 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Alpha-BHC Tetrachloroethene Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
Beta-BHC 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Isophorone
Delta-BHC 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Naphthalene
Gamma-BHC Trichloroethene Nitrobenzene
Chlordane Toluene N-Nitrosodimethylamine
4,4'-DDD Vinyl Chloride N-Nitrosodiprophylamine
4,4'-DDE N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
4,4'-DDT Base/Neutral Extractable Organic Phenanthrene
Dieldrin Compounds (EPA Method 625) Pyrene
Endosulfan I 2,3,7,8-Tetrach lord ibenzo-P-Dioxin
Endosulfan II Acenaphthene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Endosulfan Sulfate Acenaphthylene
Endrin Anthracene Acid Extractable Organic
Endrin Aldehyde Benzidene Compounds (EPA Method 625)
Heptachlor Benzo (a)Anthracene
Heptachlor Epoxide Benzo (b) Fluoranthene 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
PCB-1016 Benzo (k) Fluroanthene 2-Chlorophenol
PCB-1221 Benzoe (a) Pyrene 2,4-Dichlorophenol
PCB-1232 Benzo (g,h,i) Perylene 2,4-Dimethylphenol
PCB-1242 Bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether 2,4-Dinitrophenol
PCB-1248 Bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane 2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
PCB-1254 Bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 2-Nitrophenol
PCB-1260 Bis (dichloroisopropyl) Ether 4-Nitrophenol
Toxaphene 4-Bromophenyl-Phenyl Ether Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
appendix d
FEES/PENALTIES FOR NON-COMPLIANCES
Orange County Sanitation District
Fees / Penalties for Non-Compliances
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
Facility Issue Date Amount Item Enforcement ID
9W Halo Western opCo, L.P. 10/17/2018 $815.00 Significant Non-Compliance Publication 2018-00025952
Accurate Circuit Engineering 05/13/2019 $525.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00029479
Active Plating, Inc. 11/20/2018 $725.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00026420
Advance Tech Plating, Inc. 05/16/2019 $757.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00029508
Alloy Die Casting Co. 10/04/2018 $483.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025882
Alloy Tech Electropolishing, Inc. 09/28/2018 $510.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025499
Anchen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Goodyea 02/26/2019 $675.00 Notice of violation 2019-00028024
APCT Orange County 07/12/2018 $260.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00024547
APCT Orange County 10/01/2018 $400.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025128
APCT Orange County 06/10/2019 $525.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00029653
Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, Inc. 06/10/2019 $575.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00029866
Astech Engineered Products, Inc. 10/17/2018 $980.00 Significant Non-Compliance Publication 2018-00025953
B. Braun Medical, Inc. (West/Lake) 11/21/2018 $707.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00026419
Bazz Houston Co. 05/09/2019 $400.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00029457
Beo-Mag Plating 02/26/2019 $675.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00028356
Bristol Industries 09/04/2018 $675.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025129
Bristol Industries 12/17/2018 $725.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00027001
Bristol Industries 02/25/2019 $200.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00027737
Bristol Industries 02/25/2019 $400.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00028036
Bristol Industries 02/26/2019 $807.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00028355
Bristol Industries 03/18/2019 $725.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00028387
Bristol Industries 04/08/2019 $400.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00028922
Cadillac Plating, Inc. 12/04/2018 $200.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00026761
Cal-Aurum Industries, Inc. 07/26/2018 $535.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00024788
Catalina Cylinders,A Div. of APP 03/28/2019 $400.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00028639
Catalina Cylinders,A Div. of APP 05/16/2019 $400.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00029506
Central Powder Coating 07/18/2018 $535.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00024596
Central Powder Coating 10/02/2018 $200.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025143
City of Huntington Beach Fire Departm 05/28/2019 $400.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00029538
CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp. 08/22/2018 $483.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025126
Cooper and Brain, Inc. 09/10/2018 $400.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025485
D.F. Stauffer Biscuit Co., Inc. 07/19/2018 $233.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00024595
Darling International, Inc. 10/22/2018 $507.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025962
Dr. Smoothie Enterprises- DBA Bevolut 11/20/2018 $507.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00026418
Dr. Smoothie Enterprises- DBA Bevolut 12/17/2018 $400.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00026999
Dunham Metal Processing 01/18/2019 $775.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00027760
Electro Metal Finishing Corporation 09/28/2018 $710.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025486
Excello Circuits Manufacturing Corp. 08/23/2018 $710.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025136
FMH Aerospace Corp DBA FMH Corpor 09/04/2018 $200.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025361
Goodwin Company 06/04/2019 $400.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00029823
Green Clean Water&Waste Services 10/17/2018 $815.00 Significant Non-Compliance Publication 2018-00025954
Green Clean Water&Waste Services 12/27/2018 $225.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00027367
Hanson-Loran Co., Inc. 103/19/20191 $507.00 INotice of Violation 2019-00028623
Hanson-Loran Co., Inc. 105/09/20191 $200.00 INotice of Violation 2019-00029410
Page 1 of 2
Orange County Sanitation District
Fees / Penalties for Non-Compliances
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
Facility Issue Date Amount Item Enforcement ID
Hanson-Loran Co., Inc. 06/12/2019 $707.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00029879
Hightower Plating& Manufacturing Co. 06/10/2019 $525.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00029519
Hixson Metal Finishing 10/11/2018 $775.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025891
Hixson Metal Finishing 10/18/2018 $21,000.00 Administrative Complaint Settlement Agreement 2018-00023606
Independent Forge Company 03/07/2019 $400.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00028547
Independent Forge Company 04/03/2019 $725.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00028607
Industrial Metal Finishing, Inc. 01/02/2019 $507.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00027375
Irvine Company Apartment Communiti 01/16/2019 $400.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00027748
J&J Marine Aquisitions, LLC 05/13/2019 $725.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00029477
Kenlen Specialities, Inc. 10/11/2018 $775.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025890
Legendary Baking of California, LLC 10/11/2018 $507.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025912
Legendary Baking of California, LLC 01/09/2019 $507.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00027625
Linco Industries, Inc. 02/26/2019 $756.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00028357
Manufactured Packaging Products 10/17/2018 $485.00 Significant Non-Compliance Publication 2018-00025504
Marukome USA, Inc. 08/22/2018 $483.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025130
Murrietta Circuits 01/15/2019 $707.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00027735
National Construction Rentals 05/10/2019 $200.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00028989
National Construction Rentals 05/10/2019 $707.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00029523
O.C. Waste& Recycling 04/03/2019 $507.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00028605
Only Cremations for Pets 07/18/2018 $508.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00024597
Patio and Door Outlet, Inc. 04/03/2019 $725.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00028608
Patriot Wastewater, LLC(Freedom CW1 03/12/2019 $200.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00028436
Performance Powder, Inc. 10/22/2018 $725.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025990
Precon, Inc. 04/03/2019 $725.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00028606
Precon, Inc. 04/04/2019 $200.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00028846
Prima-Tex Industries Inc. 07/12/2018 $535.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00024548
Republic Waste Services 10/25/2018 $875.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00026108
Safran Electronics & Defense,Avionics t 10/09/2018 $400.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025895
South Coast Baking, LLC 05/09/2019 $507.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00029412
SPS Technologies LLC, DBA Cherry Aero 07/26/2018 $225.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00024786
SPS Technologies LLC, DBA Cherry Aero 12/17/2018 $725.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00027000
Star Manufacturing LLC, dba Commerci 04/04/2019 $400.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00028878
Star Manufacturing LLC, dba Commerci 06/03/2019 $756.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00029712
Statek Corporation (Main) 02/26/2019 $707.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00028358
Superior Plating 05/29/2019 $50,000.00 Administrative Complaint Settlement Agreement 2019-00029509
Tayco Engineering, Inc. 01/18/2019 $725.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00027759
Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company 02/26/2019 $725.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00027756
Thompson Energy Resources, LLC 08/20/2018 $549.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025086
TTM Technologies North America, LLC. 10/02/2018 $400.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00025778
TTM Technologies North America, LLC. 11/08/2018 $400.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00026116
TTM Technologies North America, LLC. 11/08/2018 $400.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00026320
Ultra-Pure Metal Finishing, Inc. 05/13/2019 $725.00 Notice of Violation 2019-00029474
Van Law Food Products, Inc. 110/11/20181 $707.00 INotice of Violation 2018-00025910
Van Law Food Products, Inc. 110/25/20181 $200.00 INotice of Violation 2018-00026119
Page 2 of 2
appendix e
PUBLIC NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANTLY
NON-COMPLIANT INDUSTRIES
The Orange County Register PROOF OF PUBLICATION
2190 S. Towne Centre Place Suite 100
Anaheim, CA 92806 Legal No. 0011326591
714-796-2209
PUBLIC NOTICE
Inp accordgance with ito1�e1epublic
P. yPa(rrticipattioo„ regnuuiremen►iss of 40 CFR
PortOfdet standards and
ff (0050) FC the Re aeWbyII(M s V National ttio fdlawi p I Su of p5orrrifiite�
who,d�rtnq Jsuily 1201e through June 3a 2014,wero Identified as
11tlo„�dtarda.fAn tndursf�rviin sharoe
ign oni noncomhplvtanci is fined as
5190301 Ilows:
• Chronic violations of discharge limits occurring when 66%or
OC SANITATION DIST DIRECT more of all measurements exceed the discharge limits for th
q, .. some pollutant.
10844 ELLIS AVE • Acute violations of discharge limits occurring when 3:1`'6 0
more of all measurements easureents are a motor violation of the dis
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-7018
charge limits,
Ir • Any other violation that OCSD determines has caused,atone or
in combination with other discharges, interference or pass
through.
i An discharge of a pollutant that has caused Imminent
endangerment to human health,welfare or to the environment
or has resulted in OCSD's exercise of Its emergency authors
., to halt or prevent such a discharge.
• Failure to meet within 90 days offer the schedule date,
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION compliance schedule milestone.
Failure to pprovide required reports including, but not limited
to, periodic self monitoring reports and reports with
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, compliance schedules within 45 days ofthe due date.
SS. •. Failure to accurately report noncompliance with discharge lim
Its or any other requirements applicable to the user pursuant to
County of Orange OCSD's Wastewater Discharge Regula ions(Ordinance).
• Any. other violation or group of violations, which OCSD
determines will adversely affect the Implementation of the
pretreatment program. eel
malo i r ottthe permilla�eliste�d action against
a�wFplemene„itodtaaequato
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the dischargestandgrdsasofthedateofthisipublca ionthxwaatewater
County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and
Cup11MYr1.rrl Mlell i Cw•.ry
not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I
am the principal clerk of The Orange County Register, a
Ny.F1AbrryUll.
newspaper of general circulation, published in the city of 'AlrftpypWFattp 8Wo,Ioq I.M,t*I ,NWar•ra.a,I4"" ^'•
r nM NIA.Vr.•m.
Santa Ana, County of Orange, and which newspaper has M•4mF mft N./
lk—kAwv. 41tvt /nnl � �"•
been adjudged to be a newspaper of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of Cnp C !n A6b.-(—
Ild.prldmx pup" '-0tsn� NArurrrAiy Oleo
California, under the date of November 19, 1905, Case No. 0M.
A-21046, that the notice, of which the annexed is a true n....lCo, KIn 1.30W csorrALk awa
m»-.r,o•w... I�xltCt «sD WallnM Pw•.rv�
printed copy, has been published in each regular and MW44w.•.c.•... I-0QWT WOO` 41km
-tsw Mwu%WzWLLG�MCWW tW ,-.m.., c.-co v.J u,a �•r.r
entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement -
thereof on the following dates, to wit:
new+naaw � wlnti N.rnwv e.wA..
10/21/2019 Coy�u.fAeelFH,hrpCop.AOMfbn `'°`�. Nwr1iV•a nr..ra+e
o(VakMo 9ufe�a Ta�n.b91 W
Ibrr�!np.A.n I MIM1 IY.901 ua1LMf PleW(Ala
.RI h .M M MI1/01' Ilr•1 RM�'O _
Smu.A1u
'4•l,VV[ulvf., I-0fIQ% OCd04a1Mt kWrie
Nwws Camnl Hon RftY h y1Mp OI'.EOIrdUNf 9uAaA>�
I certify(or declare) under the penalty of perjury under the Publish:Orange county Register Oct.21,2019 11326591
laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true —and correct:
Executed at Anaheim, Orange County, California, on
Date: October 21, 2019.
Signature
appendix f
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Resource Protection Division of the Orange County Sanitation District wishes to acknowledge the
following people for their valuable contributions to this report:
OCSD Resource Protection Division
Roya Sohanaki.............................................. Reviewer/Writer/Signatory, Resource Protection Manager
Ted Gerber................................................................................Reviewer/Writer, Engineering Supervisor
Lori McKinley .....................................................Report Coordinator/Writer, Sr. Environmental Specialist
Pegah Behravan......... .. .................................................................................Writer, Engineer
Jason Daniel ....................................................................................................................Writer, Engineer
Brian Finkelstein......................................................................... .....Writer, Associate Engineer
Tom Gaworski..........................................................Writer/Reviewer, Principal Environmental Specialist
Kiran Kaur.....................................................................................................Writer, Engineer
Mark Kawamoto........................................................................Writer/Reviewer, Engineering Supervisor
Mila Kleinbergs ...........................................................................................Writer/Reviewer, Sr. Engineer
Bryce Dragan...............................................................Writer, Principal Environmental Specialist
Jonathon Powell...............................................................................................Writer, Associate Engineer
Merrill Seiler.............................................................................Writer, Principal Environmental Specialist
Tom Walker......................................................................................................Writer, Associate Engineer
MikeZedek ......................................................................................................................Writer, Engineer
OCSD Public Affairs, Laboratory, Monitoring and Compliance, Operations,
Financial Management Staff
Jeff Armstrong................................................... ..................................Environmental Supervisor
Deirdre Bingman......................................................................Writer, Principal Environmental Specialist
Angela Brandt.............................................................................................Writer, Accounting Supervisor
Dindo Carrillo.....................................................................................Writer, Sr. Environmental Specialist
Pragathi Chandupatla.........................................................................Writer, Information Tech Analyst III
Gregg Deterding .............................................................................Cover Design, Graphics Coordinator
Robert Gamber .................................................................................Writer, Sr. Environmental Specialist
Matthew Garchow............................................. Analytical Data/Appendices, Principal Info Tech Analyst
DungNguyen.........................................................................................................................Writer, Intern
Peter Park.........................................................................................................Writer, Assistant Engineer
Christie Shiang.............................. .................... .................................Writer, Associate Engineer
Cristina Stanford ..............................................................................................Writer, Senior Accountant
Cindy Vellucci............................................................ ..........Writer, Sr. Environmental Specialist
Outside Agency Contributors
Marce Billings .........................................................Data Preparation, Source Control Supervisor, JCSD
Benjamin Burgett.........................................Data Preparation, Source Control Specialist II, WMWD
Andy Coady ...................................................Data Preparation, Environmental Control Officer, SBMWD
Marlyn Draper .........................................Data Preparation, Source Control Program Manager, WMWD
Elizabeth Duarte.............................................Writer/Data Preparation, Executive Secretary, IRWD
Dan DuCasse........................................................Data Preparation, Sewer Operations Manager, JCSD
Lucas Gilbert......Writer/Data Preparation/Reviewer, Manager of Permitting and Pretreatment, SAWPA
Richard Haller ................................................................................................General Manager, SAWPA
Richard Lao......................................Writer/Reviewer, Regulatory Compliance Administrator, IRWD
Michael Plasencia ....................Writer/Data Preparation, Sr. Pretreatment Program Specialist, SAWPA
Craig Proctor ..............................Data Preparation, Pretreatment and Source Control Supervisor, IEUA
David Ruhl...................................................................Reviewer/Engineering Manager, SAWPA
Sonya San Juan...........................iPACS Coordination/Data Preparation, Business Analyst, SAWPA
Frank Soto ..........................................................................Writer/Data Preparation, Sr. Scientist, IRWD
Bob Tincher .................................................... Data Preparation, Water Resources Manager, SBVMWD
David Trujillo ............................................................Data Preparation, Source Control Manager, EMWD
Sara Villa ..........................Agency Coordinator/Data Preparation, Sr. Administrative Assistant, SAWPA
appendix g
IRWD SAMPLING
APPENDIX G
2018/19 Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD)
Quarterly Priority Pollutant Monitoring
Sampling is performed quarterly by Regulatory Compliance personnel on the influent,effluent,and sludge.
The results for MWRP influent, effluent, and sludge are shown in this appendix. Two types of sampling
are performed:
1. Grab samples are collected at each location for Volatile Organic Priority Pollutants and cyanide.
2. Composite samples are collected for Base/Neutrals and Acids Extractables, Inorganic Priority
Pollutants, Pesticides/Polychlorinated Biphenyls at each location. This sampling is performed
with an automatic sampler that collects discrete, flow-paced samples over a 24-hour period. The
composite samples are collected in 5-gallon glass bottles, and then distributed out into the
appropriate glass or plastic bottle for preservation and storage.
The collection points for the samples are as follows:
• Influent: Collected from the headworks,just downstream of grit basin.
• Effluent: Collected at the end of the chlorine contact basin (CCB) but downstream of where
the CCB effluent and ultraviolet (UV) disinfected effluent are combined,just prior to
entering the recycled water distribution system.
• Sludge: Collected at the flow meter vault on the MPS-3 force main.
Cyanide analyses are performed by Weck Laboratories in the City of Industry, California. All remaining
analyses are preserved, refrigerated, and analyzed by IRWD. IRWD supplies all analysis containers with
the proper preservative.
The detection limits shown in the results are the limits for that particular sample. The detection limit may
vary from the laboratory and from sample to sample based on QA/QC analysis and the degree of sample
dilution.
APPENDIX G
INFLUENT, FINAL EFFLUENT AND SLUDGE LINE
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR INFLUENT, EFFLUENT AND SLUDGE
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
AVERAGE AVERAGE
Sample Date 7/11/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML MIN ML
INFLUENT
Antimony ND ND ND 0.742 0.186 ND 0.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 0.500 0.50
Arsenic ND ND ND 2.47 0.618 ND 1.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00
Beryllium ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 0.500 0.50
Cadmium ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 0.250 0.25
Chromium 2.81 ND 3.27 2.25 2.08 0.958 0.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 0.500 0.50
Copper 121 55.0 95.6 76.6 87.1 58.6 0.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 0.500 0.50
Lead ND ND ND 1.39 0.348 ND 0.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 0.500 0.50
Mercury 0.106 0.037 0.060 ND 0.051 0.023 0.01 0.010 0.010 0.050 0.010 0.01
Nickel 5.85 4.15 4.71 3.17 4.47 7.48 0.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 0.500 0.50
Selenium 3.30 2.95 2.84 2.40 2.87 1.74 0.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 0.500 0.50
Silver ND ND ND 3.11 0.78 ND 0.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 0.250 0.25
Thallium ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 1.00
Total Cyanide 14.0 ND ND ND 3.50 14.5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Zinc 221 137 118 175 163 140 0.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 0.500 0.50
EFFLUENT
Antimony ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.50
Arsenic 1.44 1.88 2.24 1.63 1.80 1.13 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Beryllium ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.50
Cadmium ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.25 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.25
Chromium 0.546 ND 0.510 ND 0.270 ND 0.50 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.50
Copper 6.67 7.28 7.23 4.26 6.36 6.30 0.50 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.50
Lead ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.50
Mercury ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.01 0.010 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Nickel 6.58 4.97 2.71 1.89 4.04 3.30 0.50 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.50
Selenium 1.49 2.05 2.02 1.32 1.72 1.36 0.50 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.50
Silver ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.25 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.25
Page 1
APPENDIX G
INFLUENT, FINAL EFFLUENT AND SLUDGE LINE
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR INFLUENT, EFFLUENT AND SLUDGE
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
AVERAGE AVERAGE
Sample Date 7/11/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML MIN ML
Thallium ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total Cyanide ND ND ND 13.0 3.25 ND 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Zinc 66.3 67.2 65.4 55.7 63.7 55.4 0.50 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.50
SLUDGE
Antimony 5.60 7.63 ND ND 3.31 2.27 5.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 12.50 5.00
Arsenic 22.2 34.7 24.0 42.1 30.8 11.9 10.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 25.00 10.00
Beryllium ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 12.50 5.00
Cadmium 3.20 3.77 ND ND 1.74 1.34 2.50 2.50 2.50 5.00 6.25 2.50
Chromium 42.1 64.0 71.4 81.6 64.8 39.2 5.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 12.50 5.00
Copper 1530 2790 1470 3890 2420 1596 5.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 12.50 5.00
Lead 26.1 30.3 28.7 55.4 35.1 15.3 5.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 12.50 5.00
Mercury 0.334 1.28 ND 3.63 1.31 0.88 0.01 0.20 0.50 0.50 0.01 0.01
Nickel 62.2 165 86.9 163 119 79.4 5.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 12.50 5.00
Selenium 29.9 70.1 31.7 105 59.2 31.1 5.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 12.50 5.00
Silver 9.8 27.3 9.17 26.4 18.2 15.0 2.50 2.50 2.50 5.00 6.25 2.50
Thallium ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 25.00 10.00
Total Cyanide ND ND ND 10.0 2.50 ND 5.00 5.00 5.00 50.00 10.00 5.00
Zinc 3200 3100 2620 5430 3588 3194 5.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 12.50 5.00
ML=Method Limit
ND=Not Detected
NA=Not Analyzed
=Estimated Concentration
Page 2
APPENDIX G
INFLUENT
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR INFLUENT
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
7/11/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE 7/11/2018 ML-Minimum
Sample Date 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019
VOLATILE PRIORITY POLLUTANTS:
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,2-Dichloropropane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Acrolein ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Acrylonitrile ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Benzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Bromodichloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Bromoform ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Bromomethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Carbon tetrachloride ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Chlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Chloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Chloroform 0.96 0.78 1.07 1.42 1.06 1.45 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Chloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Dibromochloromethane ND ND 0.78 0.70 0.37 ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Ethylbenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Methylene chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Tetrachloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Toluene 1.16 1.44 0.74 0.71 1.01 0.48 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Trichlorofluoromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Vinyl chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
VOLATILE POLLUTANTS-HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES:
Page 1
APPENDIX G
INFLUENT
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR INFLUENT
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
7/11/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE 7/11/2018 ML-Minimum
Sample Date 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019
2-Hexanone ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Acetone 101.00 56.60 317.00 93.00 141.90 665.75 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Carbon disulfide ND ND ND ND ND 1.57 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
m+p-Xylenes ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Methyl ethyl ketone 2.09 ND ND 4.78 1.72 3.04 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
o-Xylene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Styrene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Tetrahydrofuran ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Vinyl acetate ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE PRIORITY POLLUTANTS:
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 10.00
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 10.00
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 10.00
2-Chloronaphthalene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 10.00
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND ND ND ND ND ND 25.00 50.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 10.00
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 10.00
Acenaphthene ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Acenaphthylene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 10.00
Anthracene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 10.00
Benzidine ND ND ND ND ND ND 25.00 100.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Benzo(a)anthracene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 10.00
Benzo(a)pyrene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 10.00
Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 10.00
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND ND ND ND ND ND 20.00 20.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 20.00
Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 10.00
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 10.00
Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether ND ND 6.20 ND 1.55 ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND 25.00 50.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Butyl benzyl phthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 10.00
Chrysene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 10.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND ND ND ND ND ND 20.00 20.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 20.00
Diethyl phthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Dimethyl phthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Page 2
APPENDIX G
INFLUENT
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR INFLUENT
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
7/11/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE 7/11/2018 ML-Minimum
Sample Date 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019
Di-N-Butylphthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 10.00
Di-N-Octylphthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 10.00
Fluoranthene ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Fluorene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 10.00
Hexachlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Hexachlorobutadiene ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND ND ND ND ND ND 25.00 50.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Hexachloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND ND ND ND ND ND 20.00 20.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 20.00
Isophorone ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Naphthalene ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Nitrobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 10.00
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 10.00
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Phenanthrene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 10.00
Pyrene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 10.00
ACID EXTRACTABLE PRIORITY POLLUTANTS:
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 10.00
2,4-Dichlorophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 10.00
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
2,4-Dinitrophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 25.00 100.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
2-Chlorophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 10.00
2-Nitrophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 10.00
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol ND ND ND ND ND ND 25.00 50.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
4-Nitrophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
p-Chloro-m-cresol ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Pentachlorophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 10.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 10.00
Phenol ND 14.70 ND ND 3.68 13.88 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
BNA EXTRACTABLE POLLUTANTS-HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol NA ND ND ND ND ND 25.00 - 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
2-Methylnaphthalene NA ND ND ND ND ND 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
2-Methylphenol NA ND ND ND ND ND 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
2-Nitroaniline NA ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
3-Nitroaniline NA ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Page 3
APPENDIX G
INFLUENT
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR INFLUENT
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
7/11/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE 7/11/2018 ML-Minimum
Sample Date 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019
4-Chloroaniline NA ND ND ND ND ND 25.00 - 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
3&4-Methylphenol NA 49.60 24.30 38.20 37.37 25.70 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
4-Nitroaniline NA ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Aniline NA ND ND ND ND ND 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Benzoic acid NA ND ND ND ND ND 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00
Benzyl alcohol NA ND ND ND ND ND 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
Dibenzofuran NA ND ND ND ND ND 25.00 - 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
PRIORITY POLLUTANT PESTICIDES:
4,4'-DDD ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.25 0.50 0.25 5.00 5.00 0.25
4,4'-DDE ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.25 0.50 0.25 5.00 5.00 0.25
4,4'-DDT ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 0.10 0.05 1.00 1.00 0.05
Aldrin ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.50 0.50 0.05
Alpha-BHC ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 0.10 0.05 1.00 1.00 0.05
Beta-BHC ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.50 0.50 0.05
Chlordane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 5.00 0.50 10.00 10.00 0.50
Delta-BHC ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.50 0.50 0.05
Dieldrin ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 0.10 0.05 1.00 1.00 0.05
Endosulfan sulfate ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.25 0.50 0.25 5.00 5.00 0.25
Endosulfan-I ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 0.20 0.10 2.00 2.00 0.10
Endosulfan-ll ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 0.10 0.05 1.00 1.00 0.05
Endrin ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 0.10 0.05 1.00 1.00 0.05
Endrin aldehyde ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 0.10 0.05 1.00 1.00 0.05
Heptachlor ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 0.10 0.05 1.00 1.00 0.05
Heptachlor epoxide ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 0.10 0.05 1.00 1.00 0.05
Lindane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 0.20 0.10 2.00 2.00 0.10
Methoxychlor NA ND NA NA ND ND 0.25 - 0.25 - - 0.25
PCB-1016 ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.50 25.00 2.50 50.00 50.00 2.50
PCB-1221 ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.50 25.00 2.50 50.00 50.00 2.50
PCB-1232 ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.50 25.00 2.50 50.00 50.00 2.50
PCB-1242 ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.50 25.00 2.50 50.00 50.00 2.50
PCB-1248 ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.50 25.00 2.50 50.00 50.00 2.50
PCB-1254 ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.50 25.00 2.50 50.00 50.00 2.50
PCB-1260 ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.50 25.00 2.50 50.00 50.00 2.50
Toxaphene ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.50 25.00 2.50 50.00 50.00 2.50
ML=Method Limit
Page 4
APPENDIX G
INFLUENT
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR INFLUENT
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
7/11/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE 7/11/2018 ML-Minimum
Sample Date 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019
ND=Not Detected
NA=Not Analyzed
=Estimated Concentration
Page 5
APPENDIX G
FINAL EFFLUENT
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR FINAL EFFLUENT
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
7/11/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE
Sample Date 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML
VOLATILE PRIORITY POLLUTANTS:
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
1,2-Dichloropropane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
Acrolein ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00
Acrylonitrile ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Benzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
Bromodichloromethane 28.5 26.3 19.2 21.5 23.9 24.7 0.50
Bromoform 0.55 ND ND ND 0.14 0.14 0.50
Bromomethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
Carbon tetrachloride ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
Chlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
Chloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
Chloroform 63.4 75.6 69.5 85.8 73.6 76.2 0.50
Chloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
Page 6
APPENDIX G
FINAL EFFLUENT
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR FINAL EFFLUENT
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
7/11/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE
Sample Date 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML
Dibromochloromethane 8.01 6.43 4.92 5.61 6.24 6.41 0.50
Ethylbenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
Methylene chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Tetrachloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
Toluene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
TrichIorofluoromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
Vinyl chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
VOLATILE POLLUTANTS-HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES:
2-Hexanone ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00
Acetone ND ND ND 2.10 0.525 0.520 2.00
Carbon disulfide ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00
m+p-Xylenes ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
Methyl ethyl ketone ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
o-Xylene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
Styrene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
Tetrahydrofuran ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00
Vinyl acetate ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05
BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE PRIORITY POLLUTANTS:
Page 7
APPENDIX G
FINAL EFFLUENT
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR FINAL EFFLUENT
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
7/11/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE
Sample Date 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
2-Chloronaphthalene ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Acenaphthene ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00
Acenaphthylene ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Anthracene ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Benzidine ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00
Benzo(a)anth race ne ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Benzo(a)pyrene ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND ND ND ND ND ND 4.00
Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00
Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00
Butyl benzyl phthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Chrysene ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND ND ND ND ND ND 4.00
Diethyl phthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Dimethyl phthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Page 8
APPENDIX G
FINAL EFFLUENT
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR FINAL EFFLUENT
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
7/11/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE
Sample Date 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML
Di-N-Butylphthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Di-N-Octylphthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Fluoranthene ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00
Fluorene ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Hexachlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00
Hexachlorobutadiene ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00
Hexachloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND ND ND ND ND ND 4.00
Isophorone ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00
Naphthalene ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00
Nitrobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00
N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00
Phenanthrene ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Pyrene ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
ACID EXTRACTABLE PRIORITY POLLUTANTS:
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
2,4-Dichlorophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
2,4-Di methyl phenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
2,4-Dinitrophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00
2-Chlorophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
2-Nitrophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Page 9
APPENDIX G
FINAL EFFLUENT
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR FINAL EFFLUENT
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
7/11/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE
Sample Date 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00
4-Nitrophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00
p-Chloro-m-cresol ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00
Pentachlorophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00
Phenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00
BNA EXTRACTABLE POLLUTANTS-HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol NA ND ND ND ND ND 5.00
2-Methylnaphthalene NA ND ND ND ND ND 5.00
2-Methylphenol NA ND ND ND ND ND 5.00
2-Nitroaniline NA ND ND ND ND ND 10.00
3-Nitroaniline NA ND ND ND ND ND 20.00
4-Chloroaniline NA ND ND ND ND ND 5.00
3&4-Methylphenol NA ND ND ND ND ND 1.00
4-Nitroaniline NA ND ND ND ND ND 20.00
Aniline NA ND ND ND ND ND 5.00
Benzoic acid NA ND ND ND ND ND 50.00
Benzyl alcohol NA ND ND ND ND ND 5.00
Dibenzofuran NA ND ND ND ND ND 5.00
PRIORITY POLLUTANT PESTICIDES:
4,4'-DDD ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05
4,4'-DDE ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05
4,4'-DDT ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.01
Page 10
APPENDIX G
FINAL EFFLUENT
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR FINAL EFFLUENT
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
7/11/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE
Sample Date 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML
Aldrin ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.01
Alpha-BHC ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.01
Beta-BHC ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.01
Chlordane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10
Delta-BHC ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.01
Dieldrin ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.01
Endosulfan sulfate ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05
Endosulfan-I ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.02
Endosulfan-ll ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.01
Endrin ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.01
Endrin aldehyde ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.01
Heptachlor ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.01
Heptachlor epoxide ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.01
Lindane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.02
Methoxychlor NA ND NA NA ND ND 0.05
PCB-1016 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
PCB-1221 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
PCB-1232 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
PCB-1242 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
PCB-1248 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
PCB-1254 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
PCB-1260 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
Toxaphene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50
ML=Method Limit
Page 11
APPENDIX G
FINAL EFFLUENT
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR FINAL EFFLUENT
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
7/11/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE
Sample Date 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML
ND=Not Detected
NA=Not Analyzed
*=Estimated Concentration
Page 12
APPENDIX G
SLUDGE LINE
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR SLUDGE LINE
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
7/11/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE 7/11/2018 MIN MIL
Sample Date 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019
VOLATILE PRIORITY POLLUTANTS:
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,1-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,2-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Acrolein ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Acrylonitrile ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Benzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Bromodichloromethane ND ND ND ND ND 1.75 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Bromoform ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Bromomethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Carbon tetrachloride ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Chlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Chloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Chloroform 4.51 0.87 1.86 2.35 2.40 7.96 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Chloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Dibromochloromethane ND ND ND ND ND 0.43 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Ethylbenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Methylene chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Tetrachloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Toluene 6.33 5.03 2.46 ND 3.46 4.05 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Page 13
APPENDIX G
SLUDGE LINE
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR SLUDGE LINE
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
7/11/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE 7/11/2018 MIN MIL
Sample Date 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019
Trichlorofluoromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Vinyl chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
VOLATILE POLLUTANTS-HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES:
2-Hexanone ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
4-M ethyl-2-pentanone ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Acetone 126 2.20 34.3 ND 40.6 25.7 2.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Carbon disulfide 356 ND 119 ND 119 178 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
m+p-Xylenes ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Methyl ethyl ketone ND ND ND ND ND 1.61 2.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
o-Xylene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Styrene ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Tetrahydrofuran ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Vinyl acetate ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.05 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE PRIORITY POLLUTANTS:
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 100.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
2-Chloronaphthalene ND ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 500.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Acenaphthene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 100.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Acenaphthylene ND ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Anthracene ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Benzidine ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 1000.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Benzo(a)anthracene ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Benzo(a)pyrene ND ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 200.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Page 14
APPENDIX G
SLUDGE LINE
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR SLUDGE LINE
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
7/11/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE 7/11/2018 MIN ML
Sample Date 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019
Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 100.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether ND ND ND ND ND ND 20.00 100.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ND ND 71.0 64.7 33.9 155 50.00 500.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Butyl benzyl phthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Chrysene ND ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 200.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Diethyl phthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND 20.00 100.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Dimethyl phthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND 20.00 100.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
Di-N-Butylphthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Di-N-Octylphthalate ND ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Fluoranthene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 100.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Fluorene ND ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Hexachlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 100.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Hexachlorobutadiene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 100.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Hexachloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 500.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 200.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Isophorone ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 100.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Naphthalene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 100.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Nitrobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 100.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 100.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Phenanthrene ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Pyrene ND ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
ACID EXTRACTABLE PRIORITY POLLUTANTS:
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
2,4-Dichlorophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 20.00 100.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00
2,4-Dinitrophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 1000.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Page 15
APPENDIX G
SLUDGE LINE
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR SLUDGE LINE
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
7/11/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE 7/11/2018 MIN ML
Sample Date 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019
2-Chlorophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
2-Nitrophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 500.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
4-Nitrophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 500.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
p-Chloro-m-cresol ND ND ND ND ND ND 10.00 100.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Pentachlorophenol ND ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Phenol ND ND 11.0 ND 2.75 69.7 10.00 100.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
BNA EXTRACTABLE POLLUTANTS-HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol NA ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 - 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
2-Methyl naphthalene NA ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
2-Methylphenol NA ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
2-Nitroaniline NA ND ND ND ND ND 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
3-Nitroaniline NA ND ND ND ND ND 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00
4-Chloroaniline NA ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
3&4-Methylphenol NA ND 53.0 ND 17.7 833 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
4-Nitroaniline NA ND ND ND ND ND 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00
Aniline NA ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Benzoic acid NA ND ND ND ND ND 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00
Benzyl alcohol NA ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Dibenzofuran NA ND ND ND ND ND 50.00 - 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
PRIORITY POLLUTANT PESTICIDES:
4,4'-DDD ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 5.00 10.00 0.50
4,4'-DDE ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 5.00 10.00 0.50
4,4'-DDT ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 0.20 0.10 1.00 2.00 0.10
Aldrin ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.50 1.00 0.10
Alpha-BHC ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 0.20 0.10 1.00 2.00 0.10
Beta-BHC ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.50 1.00 0.10
Chlordane ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00 2.00 1.00 10.00 20.00 1.00
Delta-BHC ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.50 1.00 0.10
Dieldrin ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 0.20 0.10 1.00 2.00 0.10
Page 16
APPENDIX G
SLUDGE LINE
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR SLUDGE LINE
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results in ug/I except as noted)
7/11/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE 7/11/2018 MIN ML
Sample Date 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019 2018-2019 2017-2018 ML 9/18/2018 10/17/2018 1/16/2019 4/3/2019
Endosulfan sulfate ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.50 1.00 0.50 5.00 10.00 0.50
Endosulfan-I ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.20 0.40 0.20 2.00 4.00 0.20
Endosulfan-II ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 0.20 0.10 1.00 2.00 0.10
Endrin ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 0.20 0.10 1.00 2.00 0.10
Endrin aldehyde ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 0.20 0.10 1.00 2.00 0.10
Heptachlor ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 0.20 0.10 1.00 2.00 0.10
Heptachlor epoxide ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 0.20 0.10 1.00 2.00 0.10
Lindane ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.20 0.40 0.20 2.00 4.00 0.20
Methoxychlor NA ND NA NA ND ND 0.50 - 0.50 - - 0.50
PCB-1016 ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 50.00 100.00 5.00
PCB-1221 ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 50.00 100.00 5.00
PCB-1232 ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 50.00 100.00 5.00
PCB-1242 ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 50.00 100.00 5.00
PCB-1248 ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 50.00 100.00 5.00
PCB-1254 ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 50.00 100.00 5.00
PCB-1260 ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 50.00 100.00 5.00
Toxaphene ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.00 10.00 5.00 50.00 100.00 5.00
ML=Method Limit
ND=Not Detected
NA=Not Analyzed
*=Estimated Concentration
Page 17
appendix h
SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY
(SAWPA) REPORTS, DATA, SNC NOTICE
APPENDIX H
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority(SAWPA)July 1, 2018-June 30, 2019
List of SIUs with Monitoring Compliance Status
Member/ Direct/ NAICS TTO Waiver No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s)in
Facility Name Contract Indirect Permit No. Physical Address Code Classification Regulation Issued Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Violation SNC Status Comment
Agency Discharger
Anita B.Smith Treatment Facility WMWD Direct D1074-3.1 2100 Fleetwood Drive 221310 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 6 4
Riverside,CA 92509
C.C.Graber Company IEUA Indirect 11005-2.1 315 E.4th Street 311421 CIU 407.64 - 4 0 0
Ontario,CA 91764
California Institution for Men IEUA Direct D1006-3 14901 Central Avenue Chino,CA 91710 922140 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 14 29
Chino I Desalter SAWPA Direct D1081-3.1 6905 Kimball Avenue Chino,CA 91708 221310 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 8 4
Chino 11 Desalter SAWPA Direct D1010-3.1 11251 Harrel Street 221310 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 16 10
Jurupa Valley,CA 91752
City of Colton-Agua Mansa Power VALLEY Direct D1002-3.1 2040 W.Agua Mansa Road 221122 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 8 12
Plant Colton,CA 92324
City of Corona Ion Exchange Treatment WMWD Direct D1125-2 410 Rimpau Avenue 221310 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 4 2
Plant Corona,CA 92882
City of Corona's Water Reclamation WMWD Direct- E1013-2.1 2205 Railroad Street 221310 SIU 403.5(d) - 1 0 0
Facility No.1 Emergency Corona,CA 92880
Dart Container Corporation WMWD Direct D1019-3 150 S.Maple Street Corona,CA 92880 326140 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 24 4
11041 Inland Avenue Published as SNC
Del Real Foods,LLC JCSD Direct D1021-2.1 Jurupa Valley,CA 91752 311991 SIU 403.5(d) - 66 38 14 pH(Local) for Reporting
Violations
EMWD Collection Station SAWPA Direct D1055-2.2 29541 Murrieta Road 221320 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 8 4
Menifee,CA 92586
EMWD Energy Dissipater SAWPA Direct- E1068-2.1 636 Minthorn Street 221320 SIU 403.5(d) - 2 0 5
Emergency Lake Elsinore,CA 92530
EMWD Perris&Menifee Desalination SAWPA Direct D1061-3 29541 Murrieta Road 221310 SIU 403.5(d) - 5 8 6
Facility I Menifee,CA 92586
EMWD Railroad Canyon Pipeline SAWPA Direct- E1067-3.1 Railroad Canyon Road 221320 SIU 403.5(d) - 2 0 9
Emergency Canyon Lake,CA 92587
IEUA Collection Station SAWPA Direct D1035-3.1 16400 El Prado Road Chino,CA 91710 221320 SIU 403.5(d) - 3 8 6
IEUA Los Serranos SAWPA Direct- E1037-2.1 6075 Kimball Avenue 221320 SIU 403.5(d) - 2 0 0
Emergency Chino,CA 91708
Infineon Technologies Americas EMWD Indirect 11039-3 41915 Business Park Drive 334413 CIU 469.18 Y 4 8 8
Corporation Temecula,CA 92590
16090 Mountain Avenue Sulifde-Total(Local), Published as SNC
Inland Bioenergy,LLC SAWPA Direct D1072-3 Chino,CA 91710 562219 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 10 170 Sulfide-Dissolved(Local), for Discharge Permit Deactivated
pH(Local) Violations
Inland Empire Energy Center EMWD Direct D1036-3 26226 Antelope Road 221112 CIU 423.17 - 4 20 16
Menifee,CA 92585
JCSD Celebration Metering Station SAWPA Direct- E1042 2 1 5972 Hamner Avenue 221320 SIU 403.5(d) - 2 0 0
Emergency Eastvale,CA 92880
JCSD Etiwanda Metering Station SAWPA Direct D1044-3.1 Etiwanda Avenue and N.of 221320 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 42 16
Bellegrave Avenue
JCSD Hamner Lift Station SAWPA Direct- E1046-2.3 7302 Hamner Avenue 221320 SIU 403.5(d) - 2 0 0
Emergency Eastvale,CA 92880
JCSD Hamner Metering Station SAWPA Direct D1045-3.1 5410 Hamner Avenue 221320 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 16 16
Eastvale,CA 91752
JCSD Harrison Metering Station SAWPA Direct- E104723 6998 Harrison Avenue 221320 SIU 403.5(d) - 2 0 0
Emergency Eastvale,CA 92880
Page 1
APPENDIX H
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority(SAWPA)July 1, 2018-June 30, 2019
List of SIUs with Monitoring Compliance Status
Member/ Direct NAICS TTO Waiver No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s)in
Facility Name Contract Indirect Permit No. Physical Address Code Classification Regulation Issued Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Violation SNC Status Comment
Agency Discharger
JCSD Roger D.Teagarden Ion SAWPA Direct D1070-4 4150 Etiwanda Avenue 221310 SIU 403.5(d) - 6 5 4
Exchange Water Treatment Plant Mira Loma,CA 91752
JCSD Scholar Way Metering Station SAWPA Direct- El113 1 1 6980 Scholar Way 221320 SIU 403.5(d) - 2 0 0
Emergency Eastvale,CA 92880
JSCD Wells 17&18 Ion Exchange SAWPA Direct D1040-3.1 3474 De Forest Circle 221310 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 9 7
Treatment Facility Jurupa Valley,CA 91752
JCSD Wineville Metering Station SAWPA Direct D1048-3.1 5101 Wineville Avenue 221320 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 30 16
Jurupa Valley,CA 91752
Metal Container Corporation JCSD Direct D1056-2.1 10980 Inland Avenue Jurupa Valley,CA 91752 332431 CIU 465.45(d) - 4 40 24
Mission Linen Supply IEUA Direct D1057-3.1 5400 Alton Street 812332 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 52 44
Chino,CA 91710
Mountainview Generating Station VALLEY Direct D1058-2 2492 W.San Bernardino Ave. 221112 CIU 423.17 - 4 28 35
Redlands,CA 92374
OLS Energy-Chino IEUA Direct D1059-2.2 5601 Eucalyptus Avenue 221112 CIU 423.17 - 4 32 55
Chino,CA 91708
Rayne Water Conditioning SBMWD Indirect 11066-2.1 939 W.Reece Street San Bernadine,CA 92411 561990 SIU 403.5(d) - 3 9 8
Repet,Inc. IEUA Direct D1069-3.1 14207 Monte Vista Avenue 423930 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 39 44
Chino,CA 91710
SBMWD Collection Station SAWPA Direct D1076-3.1 399 Chandler Place 221310 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 8 d75
San Bernardino,CA 92408
SBMWD Water Reclamation Plant SAWPA Direct- E1075-2.2 399 Chandler Place 221320 SIU 403.5(d) - 2 0
Emergency San Bernardino,CA 92408
ShawCor Pipe Protection,LLC IEUA Indirect 11077-2.1 14000 San Bernardino Avenue 332812 CIU 433.17 N 4 36
Fontana,CA 92335
Stringfellow Pretreatment Facility SAWPA Direct D1079-3 3400 Pyrite Street Jurupa Valley,CA 92509 562910 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 47 274
Temescal Desaller WMWD Direct D1012-3 755 Public Safety Way 221310 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 8 6
Corona,CA 92880
WMWD Arlington Desaller SAWPA Direct D1088-3.1 11611 Sterling Avenue 221310 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 8 4
Riverside,CA 92503
WMWD Collection Station SAWPA Direct D1087-3.1 2205 Railroad Street 221320 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 6 4
Corona,CA 92880
WRCRWA South Regional Pumping SAWPA Direct- E1089-2.1 671 N.Lincoln Avenue 221310 SIU 403.5(d) - 2 0 0
Station Emergency Corona,CA 92883
YVWD Henry Wochholz Regional Water SAWPA Direct D1090-3 880 W.County Line Lane 221320 SIU 403.5(d) - 4 10 17
Recycling Facility Calimesa,CA 92320
Page 2
APPENDIX H
BI I�NE SAWPA Pretreatment Program
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment Fiscal Year 2018-2019
b Y
v
O C O O bn O C Y
U O N O C 'aJ _O C
U C N C w Y N ✓ (0 Y (6 U
v O +O' O 'co (0 �' y0 C N U a+ OA (0
Permit Number Permittees Category o LL v v L C ° ° o o- C v Other
tlp +' C 'O C E O_ CCL N N LL N N C
v o01n z v i C v v o ° E E a Y — o
7 C (0 V1 Vf '- -6 - N U
N N o 3 o E o c v ro Q m
co
m C U L O H O c6 C Q H N (0 d O p c0
O 7 C C N N 7 O Q O U O C M aU (0 -O N 'a Q LL
�. — 2 ai M O 'J
a U 2 i w x U w z a co w o o v U i co v U
IU
11003-3.1 Angelica Textile Services 40 CFR N/A X
403.5(d)
SIU
D1074-3.1 Anita B.Smith Treatment Facility 40 CFR 0.030 X
403.5(d)
CIU
Sand Filters,
11005-2.1 C.C.Graber Company 40 CFR N/A X
Cartridge Filters
403.64
SIU
D1006-3 California Institution for Men 40 CFR 0.194 X
403.5(d)
IU Grease
D1007-3 California Institution for Women 40 CFR 0.400 X interceptor&
403.5(d) Sewage Grinder
CIU
D1081-3.1 Chino I Desalter 40 CFR 2.050 X
403.5(d)
CIU
D1010-3.1 Chino II Desalter 40 CFR 1.620 X
403.5(d)
CIU
Permit Void
D1011-3.1 Chino Development Corporation 40 CFR 1.000 X
12/4/18
403.5(d)
City of Colton-Agua Mansa Power SIU Ultra-Filtration&
D1002-3.1 40 CFR 0.062 X
Plant Reverse Osmosis
403.5(d)
City of Corona's Ion Exchange IU
D1125-2 40 CFR 0.200 X
Treatment Plant
403.5(d)
1of8
APPENDIX H
BI I�NE SAWPA Pretreatment Program
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment Fiscal Year 2018-2019
Y
v
U
Permit Number Permittees Category f6
o LL Y v L c ° o a c v Other
°- no - c E a c v v LL v v
v o°n S z v i c v - v O ° E E c a Y o
7 C (0 N N 'r+ 'O in V
v E o 0 3 .o E o c v m Q v o v t LL
m 0 t H C7 Q n 2 x a CO
x c� = v ° 3 o r — t = o t=
30 >, C C N �O CO = v N CO \ � O -O
LL Q C.1 O LL W 2 U W z C_ Co W O O U U LL m U U 2 LL N v1 Q
City of Corona Water Reclamation SIU
E1013-2.1 40 CFR N/A X
Facility No.1 403.5(d)
lu
11016-3.1 Corona Regional Medical Center 40 CFR N/A X
403.5(d)
Slu
D1019-3 Dart Container Corporation 40 CFR 0.030 X X X X
403.5(d)
lu
11020-3 Decra Roofing Systems 40 CFR N/A X X X X X
403.5(d)
Slu DAF&
D1021-2.1 Del Real Foods,LLC 40 CFR 0.190 X X X X X X X Automated
403.5(d) Chemical Feed
lu
11024-2.1 Eastside Water Treatment Plant 40 CFR N/A X
403.5(d)
Slu
D1055-2.2 EMWD Collection Station 40 CFR 2.500 X
403.5(d)
Slu
E1068-2.1 EMWD Energy Dissipater 40 CFR 9.500 X
403.5(d)
Slu
D1061 3 EMWD Perris&Menifee 40 CFR 9.500 X pH adjustment
Desalination Facility for CIP discharge
403.5(d)
Slu
E1067-3.1 EMWD Railroad Canyon Pipeline 40 CFR 9.500 X
403.5(d)
2of8
APPENDIX H
BI I�NE SAWPA Pretreatment Program
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment Fiscal Year 2018-2019
Y
v
U
v O ` CO M
Permit Number Permittees Category o LL Y v L -- c ° o a c v Other
o- no - c c E a c v v LL v v
v 0 oW S z v
E Oo 0
co .2x c� = v ° 3 o r — t O nn
O >, C C N �O OO = N \ � O
CObn
LL Q C.1 LL W 2 C.1 W Z Q m W O O U U LL m C.1 C.1 2 LL N V1 Q
I Permit Void
11107-2.1 EMWD RWRF Scrubber Waste 40 CFR N/A X 6/3/19
403.5(d)
IU
11026-2.1 Farmdale Creamery,Inc. 40 CFR N/A X EC Meter
403.5(d)
IU
D1029-2.1 Frutarom USA 40 CFR 0.005 X X
403.5(d)
IU
11031-2.1 Giuliano&Sons Briners 40 CFR 0.010 X X X X X X
403.5(d)
lu
11122 1.1 Grapeland Peaker Generating 40 CFR N/A X Permit Void
Station 5/20/19
403.5(d)
IU Grease
D1032-2.1 Green River Golf Club 40 CFR N/A X
403.5(d) Interceptor
IU
11121-1.1 Hidden Villa Ranch 40 CFR N/A X
403.5(d)
SIU
D1035-3.1 IEUA Collection Station 40 CFR 2.500 X
403.5(d)
SIU
E1037-2.1 IEUA Los Serranos 40 CFR 9.000 X
403.5(d)
Infineon Technologies Americas CIU
11039-3 Corporation 40 CFR N/A X X X
469.18
3of8
APPENDIX H
BI I�NE SAWPA Pretreatment Program
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment Fiscal Year 2018-2019
Y
v
U
Permit Number Permittees Category f6
o LL Y v L c ° o a c v Other
°- no - c E a c v v LL v v
v o°n S z v i c v - v O ° E E c a Y o
7 C (0 N N 'r+ 'O in V
v E o 0 3 .o E o c v m Q v o v t LL
x c� = v ° 3 o r — t = o t=
30 >, C C N �O OO = v N CO \ � O -O
LL Q C.1 O LL W 2 U W z Q m W O O U U LL m U U 2 LL N v1 Q
SIU DAF;
D1072-3 Inland Bioenergy,LLC 40 CFR 0.200 X X X Permit Void
403.5(d) 4/2/19
Clu
D1036-3 Inland Empire Energy Center 40 CFR 1.200 X
423.17
lu
E1041-2.1 JCSD Archibald Metering Station 40 CFR 1.115 X
403.5(d)
SIU
E1042-2.1 JCSD Celebration Metering Station 40 CFR 0.170 X
403.5(d)
lu
E1043-2.1 JCSD Chandler Lift Station 40 CFR 1.115 X
403.5(d)
SIU
D1044-3.1 JCSD Etiwanda Metering Station 40 CFR 1.155 X
403.5(d)
SIU
E1046-2.3 JCSD Hamner Lift Station 40 CFR 0.940 X
403.5(d)
SIU
D1045-3.1 JCSD Hamner Metering Station 40 CFR 1.155 X
403.5(d)
SIU
E1047-2.3 JCSD Harrison Metering Station 40 CFR 0.940 X
403.5(d)
JCSD Roger D.Teagarden Ion SIU
D1070-4 40 CFR 0.300 X
Exchange Water Treatment Plant
403.5(d)
4of8
APPENDIX H
BI I�NE SAWPA Pretreatment Program
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment Fiscal Year 2018-2019
Y
v
U
Permit Number Permittees Category f6
o LL Y v L c ° o a c v Other
°- no - c E a c v v LL v v
v o°n S z v i c v - v O ° E E c a Y o
7 C (0 N N 'r+ 'O in V
v E o 0 3 .o E o c v m Q v o v t LL
x c� = v ° 3 o r — t = o t=
30 >, C C N �O CO = v N CO \ � O -O
LL Q C.1 O LL W 2 U W z C_ Co W O O U U LL m U U 2 LL N v1 Q
SIU
E1113-1.1 JCSD Scholar Way Metering Station 40 CFR 1.115 X
403.5(d)
JCSD Wells 17&18 Ion Exchange SIU
D1040-3.1 40 CFR 0.300 X
Treatment Facility
403.5(d)
SIU
D1048-3.1 JCSD Wineville Metering Station 40 CFR 1.155 X
403.5(d)
IU
11050-3.1 La Sierra University 40 CFR N/A X Grease
403.5(d) Interceptor
IU
11051-2.1 Loma Linda University Power Plant 40 CFR N/A X EC Meter
403.5(d)
Loma Linda Veterans Medical IU
11052-3.1 Center 40 CFR N/A X TDS Meter
403.5(d)
IU
D1053-2.1 Magnolia Foods 40 CFR 0.004 X X
403.5(d)
CIU
D1056-2.1 Metal Container Corporation 40 CFR 0.150 X X X X X X X Oil Skimming
465.45
SIU
D1057-3.1 Mission Linen Supply 40 CFR 0.713 X X X X Shaker Screens
403.5(d)
CIU
D1058-2 Mountainview Generating Station 40 CFR tO.432 X X X X X X Filtration
423.17
5of8
APPENDIX H
BI I�NE SAWPA Pretreatment Program
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment Fiscal Year 2018-2019
Y
v
O c
U C N C Y N Y (6 -Z M U
v O +O' O .� to OC O cn f6
Permit Number Permittees Category o LL Y v L -- c ° o a c v Other
o- no - c c E a c v v LL v v
v 0 oW S z v
E Oo 0
co .2x c� = v ° 3 o r — t O nn
O >, C C N �O OO = N \ � O
CObn
LL Q ULL W 2 C.1 W Z Q m W O O U U LL m C.1 C.1 2 LL N V1 Q
I
11114-1.1 Niagra Bottling,LLC(IEUA) 40 CFR N/A X
403.5(d)
IU
11111-1.2 Niagra Bottling,LLC(SBMWD) 40 CFR N/A X
403.5(d)
CIU
D1059-2.2 OLS Energy-Chino 40 CFR 0.129 X X
423.17
IU EC Meter;
11060-2.1 Patton State Hospital 40 CFR N/A Permit Void
403.5(d) 9/26/18
IU
11062-3 Prudential Overall Supply 40 CFR N/A X
403.5(d)
IU Permit Void
11064-4 Qualified Mobile,Inc. 40 CFR N/A X X X
403.5(d)
12/21/18
SIU
11066-2.1 Rayne Water Conditioning 40 CFR N/A X EC Meter
403.5(d)
SIU
D1069-3.1 Repet,Inc. 40 CFR 0.043 X X X X GEM,Drum&
403.5(d) Shaker Screens
IU
11096-2.1 San Antonio Regional Hospital 40 CFR N/A X
403.5(d)
IU
11128-1 Saratoga Foods,Inc. 40 CFR N/A X
403.5(d)
6of8
APPENDIX H
BI I�NE SAWPA Pretreatment Program
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment Fiscal Year 2018-2019
Y
v
U
Permit Number Permittees Category f6
o LL Y v L c ° o a c v Other
°- no - c E a c v v LL v v
v o°n S z v i c v - v O ° E E c a Y o
7 C (0 N N 'r+ 'O in V
v E o 0 3 .o E o c v m Q v o v t LL
m 0 t H C7 Q n 2 X a OO
x c� = v ° 3 o r — t = o t=
30 >, C C N �O OO = v N CO \ � O -O
LL Q C.1 O LL W 2 U W z Q m W O O U U LL m U U 2 LL N v1 Q
Slu
D1076-3.1 SBMWD Collection Station 40 CFR 0.250 Rock Box
403.5(d)
Slu
E1075-2.2 SBMWD Water Reclamation Plant 40 CFR 2.500 X
403.5(d)
Clu
11077-2.1 ShawCor Pipe Protection,LLC 40 CFR N/A X X X
433.17
lu
11078-4 Sierra Aluminum Company,Inc. 40 CFR N/A X
403.5(d)
Air Strippers,
pesticide
Slu coprecipitation,
D1079-3 Stringfellow Pretreatment Facility 40 CFR 0.259 X X X X inline cloth filter,
403.5(d) Granulated
Activated Carbon
Absorption
Slu
D1012-3 Temescal Desalter 40 CFR 2.350 X X X X
403.5(d)
lu
D1086-2.1 Wellington Foods,Inc. 40 CFR 0.020 X X X X
403.5(d)
Slu
D1088-3.1 WMWD Arlington Desalter 40 CFR 1.400 X
403.5(d)
7of8
W
p N 3
N
0 00 00 Z
V
fD
0
p o A
(D = D n
D n o
O —
C m
DO 0 ;:0 0 3
v
N
Y 3 O O fD
O 7 n
M
ao 3
O 6
7
DJ �.
4 A 4 A 4� A v
W O N W O N W O N
In T E U'i T E U'i T C O
O_ O_ O- ;O
0
� D D Flow Base(MGD)
to
Aluminum Chip Reactor M
Cyanide Destruction ,=r D
Ion Exchange N
Final Polishing Filter D
Electroless Nickel Dechelating
00 Hex.Chrome Reduction rt Z
0
00 Cross-flow Filtration(Memtek) rt 3 X
Equalization M rt =
3 �
x x x None m 0
pH Adjustment C v
3
Below Ground Clarifier
ro
Electrowinning/Plate-out
Ozone Treatment Reactor
Oil/Water-Separator
Carbon Adsorption
Centrifugation
Final pH Adjust
Batch Treatment
Clarifier/lamella Setting
Coagulation/Flocculation
Hydroxide Precipitation
Filter Press
Sludge Thickening Tank
Sorption Filter(Lancy
Air Floatation
v
O v
3 N
N O
00
W
N
O
CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU
DAILY JOURNAL CORP ORATION
Mailing Address:915 E FIRST ST,LOS ANGELES,CA 90012
Telephone(213)229-5300/Fax(213)229-5481
Visit us @ WWW.LEGALADSTORE.COM
Sara Villa/ALLISON LEWIS
SANTA ANA WATERSHED
11615 STERLING AVE
RIVERSIDE, CA 92503
CNS 3289263
PUBLIC NOTICE Summary of Permittees in
C O P Y O F NOTICE Significant t Noncom-201 nce
In accordance with the public Fiscal Year 2018-2019
participation requirements of
40 Code of Federal Permittee with Discharoe
Regulations(CFR)Part 25 in Violation
the enforcement of National Company Name // Permit
Pretreatment Standards and No.//City
as defined by 40 CFR Inland Bioenergy, LLC
Notice Type: GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE 403.8(f)(2)(vii), the Santa D1072-3//Chino
Ana Watershed Project
PUBLIC NOTICE SNC FY18-19 Authority(SAWPA)is hereby Permittee with Reporting
Ad Description publishing the following list of Violation
permittees who, during July Company Name // Permit
1, 2018 through June 30, No.//City
2019, were identified as Del Real,LLC H D1021-2.1 H
To the right is a co of the notice you sent to us for publication in the industries a significant 9/3/19Jurup Valley
9 copy Y P noncompliance with 9/3/19
RIVERSIDE PRESS ENTERPRISE.Please read this notice carefully and call wastewater discharge CNS-3289263#
us with an corrections.The Proof of Publication will be filed with the County standards. no industry is in THE PRESS ENTERPRISE
Y tY significant noncompliance if
Clerk,if required,and mailed to you after the last date below.Publication their violation meets one or
date(s)for this notice is(are): more of the following criteria:
- Chronic violations of
discharge limits occurring
when 66% or more of all
measurements exceed the
09/03/2019 discharge limits for the same
pollutant during a six month
period.
- Technical Review Criteria
violations of discharge limits
occurring when 33%or more
of all measurements equal or
exceed the product of the
numeric Pretreatment
The charge(s)for this order is as follows.An invoice will be sent after the last Standard or Requirement
date of publication. If you prepaid this order in full,you will not receive an multiplied by the applicable
TRC during a six month
Invoice. period.
- Any other violation of a
Pretreatment Standard or
Requirement that the POTW
determines has caused
Interference or Pass
Through.
-Any discharge of a pollutant
that has caused imminent
endangerment to human
health, welfare or to the
environment.
Daily Journal Corporation Failure
aft tt meet within 90
days after the schedule date,
a compliance schedule
Serving your legal advertising needs throughout California.Call your local milestone.
-Failure to provide required
reports including, but not
BUSINESS JOURNAL,RIVERSIDE (951)784-0111 limited periodic self-
monitoringg reports anndd
DAILY COMMERCE,LOS ANGELES (213)229-5300 reports with compliance
schedules within 45 days of
LOS ANGELES DAILY JOURNAL,LOS ANGELES (213)229-5300 the due date.
-Failure to accurately report
ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER,SANTA ANA (714)543-2027 noncompliance with
SAN FRANCISCO DAILY JOURNAL,SAN FRANCISCO 800 640-4829 discharge limits pp any other
( ) requirements applicable to
SAN JOSE POST-RECORD,SAN JOSE (408)287-4866 the user pursuant to
SAWPXs Wastewater
THE DAILY RECORDER,SACRAMENTO (916)444-2355 Discharge Regulations
(Ordinance).
THE DAILY TRANSCRIPT,SAN DIEGO (619)232-3486 -Any other violation or group
THE INTER-CITY EXPRESS,OAKLAND 510 violations, which the
( )272-4747 w wastewater treatment plant
determines will adversely
affect the operation or
implementation of the
Pretreatment Program.
III III II II II III I I I II II III II I II
* A 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 3 7 1 8
CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU
DAILY JOURNAL CORP ORATION
Mailing Address:915 E FIRST ST,LOS ANGELES,CA 90012
Telephone(213)229-5300/Fax(213)229-5481
Visit us @ WWW.LEGALADSTORE.COM
SARA VILLA/ALLISON LEWIS
SANTA ANA WATERSHED
11615 STERLING AVE
RIVERSIDE, CA 92503
CNS 3292869
PUBLIC NOTICE Summary of Permittees in
C O P Y O F NOTICE Significant Noncompliance
In accordance with the public Fiscal Year 2018-2019
participation requirements of
40 Code of Federal Permittee with Discharge
Regulations(CFR)Part 25 in Violation
the enforcement of National Company Name // Permit
Pretreatment Standards and No.//City
as defined by 40 CFR California Institution for
Notice Type: GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE 403.8(f)(2)(vii), the Santa Women//D1 007-3 H Corona
Ana Watershed Project 9/13/19
SNC PUBLIC NOTICE FY18-19 Authority(SAWPA)is hereby CNS-3292869#
Ad Description publishing the following list of THE PRESS ENTERPRISE
permittees who, during July
1, 2018 through June 30,
2019, were identified as
To the right is a co of the notice you sent to us for publication in the industries a significant
9 copy Y P noncompliance with
RIVERSIDE PRESS ENTERPRISE.Please read this notice carefully and call wastewater discharge
us with an corrections.The Proof of Publication will be filed with the County standards. no industry is in
y � significant noncompliance if
Clerk,if required,and mailed to you after the last date below.Publication their violation meets one or
date(s)for this notice is(are): more of the following criteria:
- Chronic violations of
discharge limits occurring
when 66% or more of all
measurements exceed the
09/13/2019 discharge limits for the same
pollutant during a six month
period.
- Technical Review Criteria
violations of discharge limits
occurring when 33%or more
of all measurements equal or
exceed the product of the
numeric Pretreatment
The charge(s)for this order is as follows.An invoice will be sent after the last Standard or Requirement
date of publication. If you prepaid this order in full,you will not receive an multiplied by the applicable
TRC during a six month
Invoice. period.
- Any other violation of a
Pretreatment Standard or
Requirement that the POTW
determines has caused
Interference or Pass
Through.
-Any discharge of a pollutant
that has caused imminent
endangerment to human
health, welfare or to the
environment.
Daily Journal Corporation Failure
aft tt meet within 90
days after the schedule date,
a compliance schedule
Serving your legal advertising needs throughout California.Call your local milestone.
-Failure to provide required
reports including, but not
BUSINESS JOURNAL,RIVERSIDE (951)784-0111 limited periodic self-
monitoringg reports anndd
DAILY COMMERCE,LOS ANGELES (213)229-5300 reports with compliance
schedules within 45 days of
LOS ANGELES DAILY JOURNAL,LOS ANGELES (213)229-5300 the due date.
-Failure to accurately report
ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER,SANTA ANA (714)543-2027 noncompliance with
SAN FRANCISCO DAILY JOURNAL,SAN FRANCISCO 800 640-4829 discharge limits pp any other
( ) requirements applicable to
SAN JOSE POST-RECORD,SAN JOSE (408)287-4866 the user pursuant to
SAWPA's Wastewater
THE DAILY RECORDER,SACRAMENTO (916)444-2355 Discharge Regulations
(Ordinance).
THE DAILY TRANSCRIPT,SAN DIEGO (619)232-3486 -Any other violation or group
THE INTER-CITY EXPRESS,OAKLAND 510 violations, which the
( )272-4747 w wastewater treatment plant
determines will adversely
affect the operation or
implementation of the
Pretreatment Program.
III III II II II III I I II I I II I II I I II
* A 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 1 2 5 0 2
appendix i
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR JULY 2018
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2072300 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler A 2072302 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2072303 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2072304 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
Sampler B 2072305 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.07
2072306 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.28 Avg. Deviation
Analysis results are reported in mg/L. Results above 0.21 Table Average
the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original # Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2072268 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04
1-511378
2045730 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04
Relative
% Difference
2072269 0.1 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.67
1-031114
2045883 0.1 0.04 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.68
Relative
1.48 % Difference
2072270 0.1 0.02 0.38 0.02 0.66 0.03
1-521790
2045148 0.1 0.02 0.38 0.02 0.67 0.03
Relative
0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 % Difference
2072271 0.1 0.11 0.29 0.02 0.02 0.62
1-021379
2041748 0.1 0.07 0.27 0.02 0.02 0.61
Relative
7.14 1.63 % Difference
0% 0% 4% 0% 2% 1% Analyte Avg. RPD
1% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR AUGUST 2018
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2084255 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler A 208456 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
208457 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
208458 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05
Sampler B 208459 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05
208460 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.06
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 Avg. Deviation
Analysis results are reported in mg/L. Results above 0.3 Table Average
the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original # Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2084262 0.1 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
1-021428
2051182 0.1 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.09 0.02
Relative
% Difference
2051194 0.1 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.09
1-521783
2051194 0.1 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.08
Relative
% Difference
2084264 0.1 0.22 0.05 0.11 0.02 0.16
1-011013
2051252 0.1 0.24 0.05 0.12 0.02 0.16
Relative
8.7 8.7 0.0 % Difference
2084265 0.1 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.06
1-011051
2050691 0.1 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.06
Relative
% Difference
0% 9% 0% 9% 0% 0% Analyte Avg. RPD
3% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR SEPTEMBER 2018
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2089168 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.30
Sampler A 2089166 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2089167 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2089169 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
Sampler B 2089170 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
2089171 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 Avg. Deviation
Analysis results are reported in mg/L. Results above 1.3 Table Average
the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original # Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2089175 0.1 0.02 0.11 0.02 0.02 0.10
1-011069
2057209 0.1 0.02 0.11 0.02 0.02 0.11
Relative
0.00 9.52 % Difference
2089176 0.1 0.02 0.12 0.02 0.02 0.08
1-021352
2057781 0.1 0.02 0.13 0.02 0.02 0.10
Relative
8.0 % Difference
2089320 0.1 0.02 0.20 0.10 0.02 0.18
1-031013
2053637 0.1 0.03 0.22 0.11 0.02 0.18
Relative
9.5 9.5 0.00 % Difference
2057357 0.1 0.02 0.26 0.02 0.02 0.02
1-021399
2089177 0.1 0.02 0.28 0.02 0.02 0.02
Relative
7.4 % Difference
0% 0% 6% 10% 0% 5% Analyte Avg. RP
3% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR OCTOBER 2018
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2096309 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler A 2096310 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2096311 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2096306 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler B 2096307 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2096308 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Avg. Deviation
Analysis results are reported in mg/L. Results above 0.0 Table Average
the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original # Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2096313 0.1 0.083 0.026 0.028 0.02 0.021
1-021081
2064699 0.1 0.09 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02
Relative
% Difference
2096314 0.1 0.02 0.334 0.02 0.02 0.02
1-021070
2063975 0.1 0.02 0.31 0.02 0.02 0.02
Relative
7.5 % Difference
2096317 0.1 0.03 0.136 0.024 0.02 0.31
1-071035
2065163 0.1 0.04 0.14 0.03 0.02 0.31
Relative
2.9 0.0 % Difference
2097194 0.1 0.097 0.331 0.02 0.02 0.122
1-531419
2059938 0.1 0.02 0.34 0.02 0.02 0.11
Relative
2.7 10.3 % Difference
0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 5% Analyte Avg. RPD
2% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR NOVEMBER 2018
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2102976 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.129
Sampler A 2102977 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.082
2102978 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.09
2102979 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.085
Sampler B 2102980 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.069
2102982 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.074
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 Avg. Deviation
Analysis results are reported in mg/L. Results above 0.2 Table Average
the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original # Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2102992 0.1 0.02 0.273 0.025 0.02 0.24
1-511405
2065852 0.1 0.04 0.23 0.02 0.02 0.23
Relative
17.1 4.3 % Difference
2102994 0.1 0.131 0.423 0.089 0.04 3.09
1-031107
2071708 0.1 0.18 0.36 0.07 0.03 2.75
Relative
31.5 16.1 11.6 % Difference
2102995 0.1 0.487 0.133 0.325 0.02 0.493
1-511407
2065589 0.1 0.54 0.15 0.35 0.02 0.51
Relative
10.3 12.0 7.4 3.4 % Difference
2102996 0.1 0.02 0.23 0.024 0.02 0.114
1-511359
2065834 0.1 0.02 0.22 0.03 0.02 0.12
Relative
2.7 5.1 % Difference
0% 21% 12% 7% 0% 6% Analyte Avg. RPD
8% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR DECEMBER 2018
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2104152 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.032
Sampler A 2104153 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2104154 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2104155 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler B 2104156 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2104157 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Avg. Deviation
Analysis results are reported in mg/L. Results above 0.1 Table Average
the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original # Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2104167 0.1 0.02 0.035 0.02 0.02 0.328
1-521820
2072325 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.33
Relative
0.6 % Difference
2104168 0.1 0.02 0.086 0.02 0.026 0.1
1-521777
2076889 0.1 0.02 0.09 0.03 0.02 0.1
Relative
% Difference
2104591 0.1 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.145
1-031270
2072613 0.100 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.16
Relative
9.8 % Difference
2104169 0.1 0.02 0.049 0.02 0.02 0.095
1-021284
2077305 0.1 0.02 0.06 0.03 0.02 0.09
Relative
% Difference
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% Analyte Avg. RPD
1% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR JANUARY 2019
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2114532 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler A 2114534 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2114530 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2114531 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler B 2114533 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2114536 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Avg. Deviation
Analysis results are reported in mg/L. Results above 0.0 Table Average
the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original # Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2114611 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.08
1-011278
2084362 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.08
Relative
% Difference
2114612 0.1 0.02 0.571 0.02 0.02 0.064
1-111129
2079353 0.1 0.02 0.5 0.02 0.02 0.07
Relative
13.3 % Difference
2114613 0.1 0.02 0.337 0.02 0.02 0.02
1-521821
2084217 0.1 0.02 0.32 0.02 0.02 0.03
Relative
5.2 % Difference
2114721 0.1 0.046 0.107 0.102 0.02 0.129
1-021282
2083043 0.1 0.04 0.1 0.1 0.02 0.13
Relative
6.8 2.0 0.8 % Difference
0% 0% 8% 2% 0% 1% Analyte Avg. RPD
2% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR FEBRUARY 2019
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2119115 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler A 2119118 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2119117 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2119116 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler B 2119119 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2119120 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Avg. Deviation
Analysis results are reported in mg/L. Results above 0.0 Table Average
the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original # Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2119124 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.66 0.02 0.02
1-111007
2090892 0.1 0.42 0.02 0.4 0.02 0.02
Relative
181.8 49.1 % Difference
2119125 0.1 0.02 0.146 0.02 0.02 0.112
1-021121
2088988 0.1 0.02 0.15 0.02 0.02 0.11
Relative
2.7 1.8 % Difference
2119126 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.024
1-021185
2089957 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Relative
% Difference
2119127 0.1 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.182
1-521783
2085144 0.1 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.15
Relative
19.3 % Difference
0% 182% 3% 49% 0% 11% Analyte Avg. RPD
41% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR MARCH 2O19
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2123205 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler A 2123207 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2123206 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2123208 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler B 2123209 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2123210 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Avg. Deviation
Analysis results are reported in mg/L. Results above 0.0 Table Average
the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original # Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2123198 0.1 0.046 0.072 0.115 0.02 0.064
1-011155
2091559 0.1 0.05 0.06 0.11 0.02 0.06
Relative
4.4 % Difference
2123200 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.039
1-111018
2091902 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
Relative
% Difference
2123204 0.1 0.02 0.035 0.02 0.02 0.042
1-511399
2092194 0.1 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.03
Relative
% Difference
2123203 0.1 0.02 0.036 0.02 0.084 0.064
1-521761
2091999 0.1 0.02 0.34 0.02 0.06 0.07
Relative
161.7 % Difference
0% 0% 162% 4% 0% 0% Analyte Avg. RPD
28% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR APRIL 2019
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2136931 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler A 2136952 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2136953 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2136954 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler B 2136955 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2136956 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Avg. Deviation
Analysis results are reported in mg/L. Results above 0.0 Table Average
the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original # Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2137006 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.123
1-141163
2103020 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.115
Relative
6.7 % Difference
2137956 0.1 0.02 0.263 0.02 0.02 0.0152
1-021402
2103841 0.1 0.02 0.298 0.02 0.02 0.977
Relative
12.5 193.9 % Difference
2137957 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.037
1-021185
2102595 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.024
Relative
% Difference
2137958 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.054 0.055
1-021664
2102761 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.06 0.054
Relative
% Difference
0% 0% 12% 0% 0% 100% Analyte Avg. RP
19% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR MAY 2019
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2140153 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.034
Sampler A 2140155 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
2140154 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.033
2140156 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.052
Sampler B 2140157 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.052
2140158 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.057
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 Avg. Deviation
Analysis results are reported in mg/L. Results above 0.2 Table Average
the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original # Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2140160 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.378
1-511385
2097938 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.407
Relative
7.4 % Difference
2140161 0.1 0.02 0.369 0.02 0.02 0.071
1-021187
2104884 0.1 0.02 0.36 0.02 0.02 0.076
Relative
2.5 % Difference
2140162 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.061
1-521756
2109074 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.059
Relative
% Difference
2140163 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.131
1-031060
2109574 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.131
Relative
0.0 % Difference
0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 4% Analyte Avg. RPD
1% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR JUNE 2019
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2147050 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.037
Sampler A 2147111 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.036
2147117 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.036
2147112 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler B 2147189 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.025
2147188 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 Avg. Deviation
Analysis results are reported in mg/L. Results above 0.1 Table Average
the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original # Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2148311 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.423 0.02
1-021664
2116643 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.2 0.02
Relative
71.6 % Difference
2148307 0.1 0.02 0.81 0.02 0.334 0.074
1-031049
2111582 0.1 0.02 0.74 0.02 0.301 0.06
Relative
9.0 10.4 % Difference
2148313 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.038
1-021297
2115076 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.034
Relative
% Difference
2148309 0.1 0.038 0.134 0.255 0.02 0.135
1-021282
2115498 0.1 0.035 0.124 0.237 0.02 0.128
Relative
7.8 7.3 5.3 % Difference
0% 0% 8% 7% 41% 5% Analyte Avg. RPD
10% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT-RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION
SAMPLE COLLECTION CHECK RESULTS, JUL-SEP 2018
Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
2085617 0.1 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.02 0.07 13.0
Sampler 2085618 0.1 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.02 0.07 10.0
A 2085619 0.1 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.02 0.08 10.0
2085620 0.1 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.02 0.07 10.0
2085621 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.07 16.0
average 0.1 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.02 0.07 11.8
range 0.0 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 6.0
Sampler Avg. Deviation 2.2
Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
2085622 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.05 11.0
Sampler 2085623 0.1 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.02 0.05 10.0
B 2085624 0.1 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.02 0.05 12.0
2085625 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.05 6.3
2085870 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.05 ND
average 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.05 9.8
range 0.0 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.7
Sampler Avg. Deviation 1.8
Site Relative Percent Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
Difference 18.3
Reporting Limits 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1.0
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT-RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION
SAMPLE COLLECTION CHECK RESULTS, OCT -DEC 2018
Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
2091183 0.1 0.03 0.03 0.12 0.02 0.04 6.3
Sampler 2091185 0.1 0.03 0.03 0.12 0.02 0.04 9.7
A 2091186 0.1 0.03 0.03 0.13 0.02 0.03 11.0
2091187 0.1 0.03 0.03 0.13 0.02 0.03 9.3
2091188 0.1 0.10 0.09 0.32 0.02 0.05 7.8
average 0.1 0.04 0.04 0.16 0.02 0.04 8.8
range 0.0 0.07 0.06 0.20 0.00 0.02 4.7
Sampler Avg. Deviation 6.24 1.4
Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
2091184 0.1 0.06 0.06 0.21 0.02 0.03 6.0
Sampler 2099193 0.1 0.04 0.04 0.15 0.02 0.03 5.8
B 2091194 0.1 0.04 0.04 0.17 0.02 0.02 7.8
2091195 0.1 0.51 0.43 1.50 0.02 0.16 8.0
2091309 0.1 0.04 0.05 0.15 0.02 0.03 7.4
average 0.1 0.14 0.12 0.44 0.02 0.05 7.0
range 0.0 0.47 0.39 1.35 0.00 0.14 2.2
Sampler Avg. Deviation 14.88 12.24 42.56 0.9
Site Relative Percent Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
Difference 90.67 23.0
Reporting Limits 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1.0
Results are shown only for results greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Results and RLs are reported in mg/L.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT-RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION
SAMPLE COLLECTION CHECK RESULTS, JAN - MAR 2019
Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
2111588 0.1 0.21 0.09 0.57 0.02 0.03 ND
Sampler 2110464 0.1 0.21 0.09 0.54 0.02 0.03 ND
A 2110465 0.1 0.21 0.09 0.56 0.02 0.03 2.6
2110466 0.1 0.21 0.09 0.57 0.02 0.03 4.0
2110470 0.1 0.22 0.09 0.57 0.02 0.03 ND
average 0.1 0.21 0.09 0.56 0.02 0.03 3.3
range 0.0 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 1.4
Sampler Avg. Deviation 0.31 0.75
Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
2110468 0.1 0.19 0.11 0.49 0.02 0.10 ND
Sampler 2110471 0.1 0.18 0.11 0.47 0.02 0.10 5.0
B 2110469 0.1 0.19 0.11 0.49 0.02 0.10 ND
2110472 0.1 0.18 0.11 0.48 0.02 0.11 ND
2110467 0.1 0.18 0.11 0.48 0.02 0.10 ND
average 0.1 0.18 0.11 0.48 0.02 0.10 5.0
range 0.0 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.0
Sampler Avg. Deviation 0.25 0.20 0.67 0.30
Site Relative Percent Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
Difference 14.76 17.35 15.17
Reporting Limits 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1.0
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT-RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION
SAMPLE COLLECTION CHECK RESULTS,APR -JUN 2019
Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
2151238 0.1 0.02 0.09 1.99 0.02 0.03 18.0
Sampler 2151237 0.1 0.02 0.10 2.07 0.02 0.04 16.0
A 2151236 0.1 0.02 0.09 2.06 0.02 0.05 31.0
2151235 0.1 0.02 0.09 1.95 0.02 0.04 23.0
2151234 0.1 0.02 0.09 1.97 0.02 0.04 22.0
average 0.1 0.02 0.09 2.01 0.02 0.04 22.0
range 0.0 0.00 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.01 15.0
Sampler Avg. Deviation 0.05 4.0
Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
2145267 0.1 0.02 0.13 2.06 0.02 0.07 8.4
Sampler 2151230 0.1 0.02 0.12 2.11 0.02 0.06 27.0
B 2151231 0.1 0.02 0.12 2.02 0.02 0.05 19.0
2151232 0.1 0.02 0.12 2.10 0.02 0.06 20.0
2151233 0.1 0.02 0.12 2.02 0.02 0.06 26.0
average 0.1 0.02 0.12 2.06 0.02 0.06 20.1
range 0.0 0.00 0.02 0.09 0.00 0.02 18.6
Sampler Avg. Deviation 0.00 0.03 5.1
Site Relative Percent Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
Difference 29.65 2.65 9.1
Reporting Limts 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1.0
Results are shown only for results greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Results and RLs are reported in mg/L.
appendix j
PERMITTEES WITH PRETREATMENT
EQUIPMENT
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
4-1
> v
o
v C T Ln
O +' bA bA +� 0 UA O rro (U Y
C O r�o 41 r j r j N ro N _ , ro
Y Y L
Permit ° D 2 N E c c o v
Facility Name Regulation GJ uA t n o L a w ;� z
No. v o un �_ v —
a--� Y O N L.L L L ; \ Y L.L L
ro ro ro v N a1 c \ + j A _ } O vn Ln O CO CU v
ro L L L L N N �l - O O C Y
w " w CO0 0 0 0 ° a i m v a
C O *' C U U U u- � � C O N � -6 aj
>� L p?S Q� L
Ln
Q u u u u u u u u u u u u w w w = 1 10 n a a in O
9W Halo Western opCo, L.P. 1-600378 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
A& G Electropolish 1-531422 433.17(a) • • • • x • x • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • •
A& R Powder Coating, Inc. 1-021088 433.17(a) • • • • • • x x • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Accurate Circuit Engineering 1-011138 433.17(a) x • x • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • x x
Active Plating, Inc. 1-011115 433.17(a) • • • • • x x x • • • • • • • • x • • • • x
Advance Tech Plating, Inc. 1-021389 433.17(a) • • • x x x • • • x • x • • • • x x
Air Industries Company,A PCC Company ( 1-031013 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • x x • • • • x
Air Industries Company,A PCC Company (1, 1-531404 433.15(a), x • x x x • • • • • • x x • x x
Alexander Oil Company 1-581185 403.5(d) • • • • • • x • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • •
All Metals Processing of O.C., Inc. 1-031110 433.17(a) • • • • x x • • x • • x x • • x • • x x • • x x x
Allied Electronics Services, Inc. 1-011073 433.17(a) x • • • x x • • • • • x x • • • • • • x x
Alloy Die Casting Co. 1-531437 464.15(a). • • • • x • • x x x x x x
Alloy Tech Electropolishing, Inc. 1-011036 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • x • x x
Alsco, Inc. 1-021656 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x x
Aluminum Forge - Div. of Alum. Precision 1-071035 467.46 • • • • x • • • x • • • • • • x x • • • • • x x x
Aluminum Precision Products, Inc. (Centra 1-0110381 467.45 • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Aluminum Precision Products, Inc. (Susan) 1-011100 467.45, x x x x HE 1 - 1 1XI . x
Page 1 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
4-1
> v
o
ro +rLo� uCron YC�r_o vL \ LL L r
Lnv Cro 0 r (OU
L
Y
O ro , vr—
o
2Permit D jN E v
Facility Name Regulation t wNo. n o L O LL
O L ;
j A o v Ln CU
N N — Co o
Y
C�L "ro wro �CO*' ro 2 6 _ m "� CL 75 M M^ C'6
O LE
> Ln
p
ZQ� 10
� oQ u u u u u u u u u u u u w w w O a a / +L�American Circuit Technology, Inc. 1-021249 433.17(a) • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • x x x • • • • x x x x
Amerimax Building Products, Inc. 1-021102 465.35 • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • •
Ameripec, Inc. 1-031057 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • x
Anaheim Extrusion Co., Inc. 1-021168 467.35(c) • • • • • • • • • • • • x x • • • • • • x x
Andres Technical Plating 1-521798 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x x x
AnoChem Coatings 1-600295 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • x • x • • • • • • •
Anodyne, Inc. 1-511389 433.17(a) x x x x x x x x x
Anomil Ent. Dba Danco Metal Surfacing 1-011155 433.17(a) x • x x x • • • • • • x • • • • • • • x • x
APCT Orange County 1-600503 433.17(a) x • • • • • • • • • • x • x • • • • • • • x • • •
Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings, Inc. 1-021081 433.15(a), • x x x x • • • x • • • x • • x x x x
ARC)Service 1-021192 433.17(a) • • • • • • x • • •
Arrowhead Products Corporation 1-031137 433.17(a) • • x • • • • • • • • •
Aseptic Technology LLC 1-600716 403.5(d) • • • • • • • x • • • • •
Astech Engineered Products, Inc. 1-571295 433.17(a) • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • x
Auto-Chlor System of Washington, Inc. 1-511384 417.166 • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Aviation Equipment Processing 1-071037 433.17(a) x • • Ix x • • • x x x -
B. Braun Medical, Inc. (West/Lake) 1 1-541 831 439.47, • • • • • • • x
Page 2 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
4-1
> v
o
ro +rLo� uCron YC�r_o vL \ LL L r
Lnv CrO 0 W r (OU
L
Y
O ro , vr—
o
2Permit D jN E v
Facility Name Regulation t wNo. n o L O LL
O L j A O v Ln CU
N N — CO O
Y
CL " wCO*' ° 2 m OJ " CL 75 M M^ C,6
O >
LE
Q� L
Ln
�
Q u u u u u u u u u u u u w w W 12 2 1
2 O 10 7 10
Basic Electronics, Inc. 1-031094 433.17(a) • • • • x • x • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Bazz Houston Co. 1-031010 403.5(d) • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • •
Beckman Coulter, Inc. 1-521824 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Beo-Mag Plating 1-511370 433.17(a) • • • • x • • • x • • • • • • x • • • x • • • x • • x
Bimbo Bakeries Usa, Inc. 1-521838 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • I x •
Black Oxide Industries, Inc. 1-021213 433.17(a) • • • • x x • • • • • x • • • x • • • x x x
Blue Lake Energy 1-521785 403.5(d) • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • •
Bodycote Thermal Processing 1-031120 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Boeing Company(Graham) 1-111018 433.17(a) x • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x x • •
Brasstech, Inc. 1-511368 433.17(a) x • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Brea Power II, LLC 1-521837 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Bridge Energy, LLC 1-600398 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Bridgemark Corporation 1-521844 403.5(d) • • • • • • • x • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • x
Brindle/Thomas- Bradley 1-531428 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Brindle/Thomas- Brooks & Kohlbush 1-531429 403.5(d) x x • • • • •
Brindle/Thomas-Catalina & Copeland 1-531430 403.5(d) x x
Brindle/Thomas-Dabney & Patton 1-531427 403.5(d) x x
Page 3 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
4-1
> v
o
v C T Ln
o +' bA bA +� 0 UA O rro (U Y
C O r�o 41 r j r j N ro N _ , ro
Y Y L
Permit ° D 2 N E c c o v
Facility Name Regulation GJ uA t n o L a w ;� z
No. v o un �_ v —
a--� Y O N L.L L L ; \ M Y L.L L
ro ro ro v N a1 c \ + j A _ } o vn Ln O CO CU v
ro L L L L N N �l — o o C Y
w " w CO 75 0 0 0 0 ° a� a� +� a m " C
C O *' U U U L.L C O ^� >� L C,6LE
Q� L
Ln
ro ro t ro ro ro O L 5, � N 6 O \
Q u u u u u u u u u u u u w w w = 2 2 2 O O n a a Z o
Bristol Industries 1-021226 433.17(a), • • • • x x • • x x x • • x • • • • • • • x x x x
Burlington Engineering, Inc. 1-521770 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • x x • • • x • • x • • • • x • • •
Cadillac Plating, Inc. 1-021062 433.17(a) • • • • x x • • x • • • • • • • x • x • • • • x • • x
Cal-Aurum Industries, Inc. 1-111089 433.17(a) • • • • • • x • • • x • x • x • • • • • • x x • -
California Gasket and Rubber Corporation 1-521832 428.66(a) • • • • • • • x • • • • • • •
Cannery Hamilton Properties, LLC. S-600807 403.5(d) • x • • • • • • x • • • • • x • • • • •
Catalina Cylinders, A Div. of APP 1-031021 467.46 • • • • • • • x • • • • • •
CD Video, Inc. 1-511076 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • • x •
Central Powder Coating 1-021189 433.17(a) • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • x • • • • • • x • • • x
Ceradyne, Inc., a 3M Company 1-600691 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Chromadora, Inc. 1-511414 433.17(a) • • • • x x • • • • x x • • • x • • • • • • x • • x
Circuit Technology, Inc. 1-521821 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • • • • x
Cirtech, Inc. 1-021133 433.17(a) • • • x x x x x • • • x x • • • • • • • x • • •
Cirtech, Inc. 1-600689 433.17(a) x x x x x • • x x • • • • • • • x • • •
City of Huntington Beach (Edgewater Lane S-600566 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
City of Huntington Beach (Warner and Edg S-600763 403.5(d) • • • • +XX
City of Huntington Beach (Willow Lane) S-600545 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • •
Page 4 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
4-1
> v
o
v C T Ln
o +' bA bA +� 0 W O rro (U Y
C O r�o 41 r j r j N ro N _ , ro
Y Y L
Permit ° D 2 N E c c o v
Facility Name Regulation GJ uA t n o L a w ;� z
No. v o un �_ v —
a--� Y O N L.L L L ; \ Y L.L L
ro ro ro v N a1 c \ + j A _ } o vn Ln O CO CU v
ro L L L L N N �l — o o C Y
w " w CO 75 0 0 0 0 ° a� a� +� a m " C
C O *' U U U L.L C O ^� >� L C,6LE
Q� L
Ln
� to to L L L ro ro ro O L � >� �
Q u u u u u u u u u u u u w w w = o o n v, o
City of Huntington Beach Fire Department 1-111015 403.5(d) • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • x
Coast to Coast Circuits, Inc. 1-111129 433.17(a) • • x • • • • • • • • • • x • x • • • • • • • • • • x
Coastline Metal Finishing 1-531436 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • x • • • • • • • • •
Columbine Associates 1-521784 403.5(d) • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • •
Continuous Coating Corporation 1-021290 433.17(a). • • • • x • x I x • • • x x x • x x x
Crest Coating, Inc. 1-021289 433.17(a) • • • • x • • • x x • x x • • • • • • x
Custom Enamelers, Inc. 1-021297 433.17(a) • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • •
Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc. Z-600005 433.17(a) • • • • x x x • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • •
DAH Oil, LLC 1-581173 403.5(d) • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • •
Darling International, Inc. 1-511378 403.5(d) • • • • • • x • • • • • • x • x • • • x • • x -
Data Aire, Inc. #2 1-021379 433.17(a) • • • • • • • x • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • x
Data Electronic Services, Inc. 1-011142 433.17(a) • • x • x • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • x x x
Data Solder, Inc. 1-521761 433.17(a) • • • • x • • • x • • • • • • x x • • • • • • x • x
DCOR, LLC 1-111013 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • x • • • • • x
Dr. Smoothie Enterprises - DBA Bevolution 1-600131 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC 1-531405 469.18(a) • • • • • • • • • x x x
Ducommun Aerostructures, Inc. 1 1-021105 433.17(a) • • • x x • • • • x x x x
Page 5 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
4-1
> v
o
v C T Ln
o +' bA bA +� 0 W O rro (U Y
C O r�o 41 r j r j N ro N _ , ro
Y Y L
Permit ° D 2 N E c c o v
Facility Name Regulation GJ uA t n o L a w ;� z
No. v o un �_ v —
a--� Y O N L.L L L ; \ Y L.L L
ro ro ro v N a1 c \ + j A _ } o vn Ln O CO CU v
ro L L L L N N �l — o o C Y
w " w CO 75 0 0 0 0 ° a� a� +� a m " C
C O *' U U U L.L C O ^� >� L C,6LE
Q� L
Ln
ro ro t ro ro ro O L N 6 O
Q u u u u u u u u u u u u w w w _ 2 O O n Z/ o
Dunham Metal Processing 1-021325 433.17(a) • • • • x x • • x • • • • • • x x • • • • • • x • x
E&B Natural Resources-Angus Petroleum 1-600254 403.5(d) • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • •
EFT Fast Quality Service, Inc. 1-011064 433.17(a) x • x • x • • • • • • • • x • • x • • • • • • x • • x
Electro Metal Finishing Corporation 1-021158 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Electrolurgy, Inc. 1-071162 433.17(a) • • x • x x x x x x • • • • • • • x • x
Electron Plating Inc. 1-021336 433.17(a) • • • • x x x x x • • • • • • x x x
Electronic Precision Specialties, Inc. 1-021337 433.17(a) x • x • • x • • • • x x • • • • • • • • • • x
Embee Processing (Anodize) 1-600456 413.14(c). • • • • • • x • • • • x x • • • • x • • • • • • • x
Embee Processing (Plate) 1-600457 413.14(c). • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Expo Dyeing and Finishing, Inc. 1-031322 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • x
Fabrication Concepts Corporation 1-011068 433.17(a) • • • • • • • x x • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Fineline Circuits &Technology, Inc. 1-021121 433.17(a) • • x • • • • • • • • • x x • • • • • • • x • • x
FMH Aerospace Corp DBA FMH Corporati 1-571331 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • x • •
FMH Aerospace Corp. 1-600585 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • x
G & M Oil Company, Inc. -Station #50 S-053293 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Gallade Chemical, Inc. 1-011257 403.5(d) • • • • • • • x
Gemini Industries, Inc. 1-071172 415.24, x x x x
Page 6 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
4-1
> v
o
v C T Ln
O +' bA bA +� 0 UA O rro (U Y
C O r�o 41 r j r j N ro N _ , ro
Y Y L
Permit ° D 2 N E c c o v
Facility Name Regulation GJ uA t n o L a w ;� z
No. v o un �_ v —
+� C Y O N L.L L L ; \ Y L.L L
ro ro ro v N a1 c \ + j A _ } O vn Ln O CO CU v
ro L L L L N N �l — O O C Y
w " w CO 75 0 0 0 0 ° a� a� +� a m " C
C O *' U U U L.L C O ^� >� L C,6LE
Q� L
Ln
� to to L L L ro ro ro O L � >� �
Q u u u u u u u u u u u u w w w = O O n O
General Container Corporation 1-031042 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • x • • • • x •
GKN Aerospace Transparency Systems 1-531401 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Green Clean Water& Waste Services 1-521857 437.47(b) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Harbor Truck Bodies, Inc. 1-021286 433.17(a) • • • • x • • x x • • • • • • x • • • • • • • x • • x
Harry's Dye & Wash, Inc. 1-521746 403.5(d) • • • • • • x x • • • • • • • • • • • •
Hartwell Corporation 1-021381 403.5(d) x • • • • • • •
Hi Tech Solder 1-521790 433.17(a) • • • • x • • • x • • • • • • x x • • • • • x • • •
Hightower Plating& Manufacturing Co. 1-021185 433.17(a) x x • x x x • • x x • • x x • • • • • • x x x
Hixson Metal Finishing 1-061115 413.14(c), x x x x x x x x x • • • • • • • x x
Ideal Anodizing, Inc. 1-021041 433.17(a) • • • • x x x • • • • • • x x
Ikon Powder Coating, Inc. 1-521756 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • x
Image Technology, Inc. 1-521755 417.86 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • • x • -
Imperial Plating 1-031106 433.17(a) • • • • x • • • x • • • • • • • • • x • • • • x x
Independent Forge Company 1-021401 467.45 • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • x x
Industrial Metal Finishing, Inc. 1-521828 403.5(d) • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • •
Intec Products, Inc. 1-021399 403.5(d) • • • • x
Integral Aerospace, LLC 1-600243 433.17(a) x . x x x x x
Page 7 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
4-1
> v
o
v C T Ln
o +' bA bA +� 0 W O rro (U Y
C O r�o 41 r j r j N ro N _ , ro
Y Y L
Permit ° D 2 N E c c o v
Facility Name Regulation GJ uA t n o L a w ;� z
No. v o un �_ v —
+� C Y O N L.L L L ; \ M Y L.L L
ro ro ro v N a1 c \ + j A _ } o vn Ln O CO CU v
ro L L L L N N �l — o o C Y
w " w CO 75 0 0 0 0 ° a� a� +� a CO " C
C O *' U U U L.L C O ^� >� L C'6LE
Q� L
Ln
� to to L L L ro ro ro O L � >� �
Q u u u u u u u u u u u u w w w = o O n O
International Paper Company(Anaheim) 1-521820 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • x x • • • x • • •
International Paper Company (Buena Park 1-531419 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • x • • • • x • • •
International Paper Company(Buena Park 1-031171 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • • x • • • • • • x • • x
Irvine Sensors Corporation 1-571328 469.18(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • • x • • • •
J & R Metal Finishing Co. 1-521823 403.5(d) • • • • • • • x • • • • x • • • • x • • • • x x
J&J Marine Aquisitions, LLC 1-551152 403.5(d) x • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Jazz Semiconductor 1-571292 469.18(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • x
JD Processing, Inc. 1-511407 433.17(a) • • • • x • x • • x • • • • • • x • • • • • • x x
Jellco Container, Inc. 1-021402 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
John A. Thomas- Bolsa Oil 1-031065 403.5(d) • • I • x • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • x
Kinsbursky Brothers Supply, Inc. 1-021424 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • x • • x • x • • • • x x •
Kirkhill TA Company (North) 1-021426 428.76(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Kirkhill TA Company (South) 1-021052 428.76(a) • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • •
Kirkhill, Inc. (North) 1-600608 428.76(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Kirkhill, Inc. (South) 1-600609 428.76(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Kraft Heinz Company 1-071056 403.5(d) x x x
Kryler Corporation 1-021428 413.14(b), x
Page 8 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
4-1
> v
o
v C T Ln
O +' bA bA +� 0 W O rro (U Y
C O M 41 r j r j N ro N _ , ro
Y Y L
Permit ° D 2 N E c c o v
Facility Name Regulation GJ uA t n o L a w ;� z
No. v o un �_ v —
+� C Y O N L.L L L ; \ Y L.L L
ro ro ro v N a1 c \ + j A _ } O vn Ln O CO CU v
ro L L L L N N �l — O O C Y
CL " wCO*' ° 2 m OJ " CL 75 M M^ C,6
O >
LE
Q� L
Ln
�
Q u u u u u u u u u u u u w w W 12 2 1
2 O 10 7 10
La Habra Bakery 1-031029 403.5(d) • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • •
Lightning Diversion Systems LLC 1-600338 433.17(a) • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • x • • •
Linco Industries, Inc. 1-021253 403.5(d) • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • x x • • • • • • x • x
LM Chrome Corporation 1-511361 433.17(a) • • • • x x • • x x x x • • x • • • • x x x
Logi Graphics, Inc. 1-031049 433.17(a) • • • • x • x x x • x • • • • x x •
LSW Enterprises, LLC 1-521863 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • x
M.S. Bellows 1-111007 433.17(a) • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • •
Magnetic Metals Corporation 1-531391 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • 11 • • x • • • • x x
Manufactured Packaging Products 1-521793 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I • • x
Manufactured Packaging Products (MPP Fi 1-021681 403.5(d) • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • •
Markland Manufacturing, Inc. 1-011046 433.17(a) • • • • x x x • • x • x x x • x x • x • • • • x • • •
Maruchan, Inc. (Deere) 1-071024 403.5(d) • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • •
Maruchan, Inc. (Laguna Cyn) 1-141015 403.5(d) • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • x
Master Wash, Inc. 1-511399 403.5(d) x • x • • • • • • • • x • • x • • • • • • • • •
MCP Foods, Inc. 1-021029 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Meggitt, Inc. 1-600006 433.17(a) • • • • x • • •
Merical, Inc. 1 1-5218401 439.47 • • • • x x x x x
Page 9 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
4-1
> v
o
v C T Ln
o +' bA bA +� 0 UA O rro (U Y
C O r�o 41 r j r j N ro N _ , ro
Y Y L
Permit ° D 2 N E c c o v
Facility Name Regulation GJ uA t n o L a w ;� z
No. v o un �_ v —
a--� Y O N L.L L L ; \ Y L.L L
ro ro ro v N a1 c \ + j A _ } o vn Ln O CO CU v
ro L L L L N N �l — o o C Y
w " w CO 75 0 0 0 0 ° a� a� +� a m " C
C O *' U U U L.L C O ^� >� L C,6LE
Q� L
Ln
s O \
Q u u u u u u u u u u u u w w w _ 2 2 2 O O n Z/ o
Merical, LLC 1-600655 439.47 • • • • • • • x • x x • • • • • • • x • x
Micrometals, Inc. 1-021153 433.17(a) • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • •
Murrietta Circuits 1-521811 433.17(a) x x • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • x
Neutronic Stamping and Plating 1-521772 433.17(a) x x • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • x • • •
Nobel Biocare USA, LLC 1-521801 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • • • x •
Nor-Cal Beverage Co., Inc. (Main) 1-021284 403.5(d) • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • •
Nor-Cal Beverage Co., Inc. (NCB) 1-021283 403.5(d) x • • • • • • • • •
O'Donnell Oil Company, LLC 1-581191 403.5(d) • • • • • x • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • •
Omni Metal Finishing, Inc. 1-021520 433.17(a) • • x x x • • • x • • x x x x • • • • • x x x x
Pacific Image Technology, Inc. 1-021070 433.17(a) • • • • • x • • • •
Pacific Western Container 1-511371 403.5(d) • • • • x • • • • • • x • • • • •
Parker Hannifin Corporation 1-141002 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x x • • • • •
Patio and Door Outlet, Inc. 1-521783 433.17(a) • • • • • • • x • • x • • • • • • • x • • • • -
Patriot Wastewater, LLC (Freedom CWT) 1-521861 437.47(b) • • • • x • • • • • • • • x x x x x • • • x -
Patriot Wastewater, LLC (Freedom Non-C 1-600147 403.5(d) • • • x • • • • • • • x x
Pepsi-Cola Bottling Group 1-031295 403.5(d) x x x
Performance Powder, Inc. 1-521805 433.17(a) x
Page 10 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
> v
o
v C T Ln
o +' bA bA +� 0 W O rro (U Y
C O r�o 41 r j r j N ro N _ , ro
Y Y L
Permit ° D 2 N E c c o v
Facility Name Regulation GJ uA t n o L a w ;� z
No. v o un �_ v —
+� C Y O N L.L L L ; \ Y L.L L
ro ro ro v N a1 c \ + j A _ } o vn Ln O CO CU v
ro L L L L N N �l — o o C Y
w " w CO 75 0 0 0 0 ° a� a� +� a m " C
C O *' C U U U L.L C O ^� >� L C,6LE
Q� L
Ln
� to to L L L ro ro ro O L � >� �
Q u u u u u u u u u u u u w w w = O O n v, o
Petroprize Corporation 1-581180 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Pier Oil Company, Inc. 1-581178 403.5(d) • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • •
Pioneer Circuits, Inc. 1-011262 433.17(a) x • x • • • • • • • • • x • x x x x • • • x • x x
Platinum Surface Coating, Inc. 1-521852 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x x x • • • x • • •
Power Distribution, Inc. 1-511400 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Powerdrive Oil & Gas Company, LLC (16th) 1-600246 403.5(d) • • • • • • x • • • I • •
Powerdrive Oil & Gas Company, LLC (2nd) 1-600248 403.5(d) • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • •
Powerdrive Oil & Gas Company, LLC (Sury 1-600245 403.5(d) • • • • • • x • • • • • • • •
Precious Metals Plating Co., Inc. 1-011265 433.17(a) • • x • • • • • • • • • • x • x • x • • • • • •
Precision Anodizing& Plating, Inc. 1-521809 433.17(a) • • • • x x • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • x
Precision Circuits West, Inc. 1-011008 433.17(a) • • • • x • • • x • • x x • • • • x x x
Precision Resource, California Division 1-111002 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • x x • • • • •
Precon, Inc. 1-021581 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • •
Prima-Tex Industries Inc. 1-031036 403.5(d) • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • x • • • • •
Quality Aluminum Forge, LLC (Cypress Nor 1-521833 467.45 • • • • x x x • • • • • • x • • • • • • • x x
Quality Aluminum Forge, LLC (Cypress Sou 1-600272 467.46 • • • • • x • • • • x • • x • • • • x
Railmakers, Inc. 1-061138 433.17(a) • • • • • • • x • • x x x
Page 11 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
4-1
> v
o
v C T Ln
o +' bA bA +� 0 UA O rro (U Y
C O M 41 r j r j N ro N _ , ro
Y Y L
Permit ° D 2 N E c c o v
Facility Name Regulation GJ uA t n o L a w ;� z
No. v o un �_ v —
a--� Y O N L.L L L ; \ Y L.L L
ro ro ro v N a1 c \ + j A _ } o vn Ln O CO CU v
ro L L L L N N �l — o o C Y
C�L "to wto LCO*' L L ro ro 2 "� QCL 75 M M^ C,6
O LE
Ln
Q u u u u u u u u u u u u �w w L,
O O n v, 10
RBC Transport Dynamics Corp. 1-011013 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • x • • • • • • • • • x
Reid Metal Finishing 1-511376 433.17(a) • • • • x x • • x • • x x x • x • • • • • • • x x • x
Remora Operating CA, LLC 1-581192 403.5(d) • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • x
Republic Waste Services 1-521827 403.5(d) • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • •
Republic Waste Services of So. Cal., LLC 1-021169 403.5(d) • • • • • • • x • • • • • •
Rigiflex Technology, Inc. 1-021187 433.17(a) x • x • • • • • • • • x • • • x
Rolls-Royce HTC 1-600212 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • I • • • • • • x
Roto-Die Company, Inc. 1-021033 433.17(a) • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • •
Rountree/Wright Enterprises, LLC 1-111028 403.5(d) • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • x
S & C Oil Co., Inc. 1-581175 403.5(d) x • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • •
Sabic Innovative Plastics, US, LLC S-057284 403.5(d) • • • • • x x • • • • • • x • •
Safran Electronics & Defense, Avionics US 1-571304 433.17(a) • • • • • • • x • • • •
Sanmina Corporation (Airway) 1-061008 433.17(a) • • x • x • • • x • • • • • • x • • • • • • • x • • •
Sanmina Corporation (Redhill) 1-061009 433.17(a) • • • • • • x • • • • • • x • x • • • x • • • x
Santana Services 1-021016 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • •
Scientific Spray Finishes, Inc. 1-031311 433.17(a) x • • • •
Semicoa 1-571313 469.18(a) x •
Page 12 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
4-1
> v
o
v C T Ln
O +' bA bA +� 0 UA O rro (U Y
C O r�o 41 r j r j N ro N _ , ro
Y Y L
Permit ° D 2 N E c c o v
Facility Name Regulation GJ uA t n o L a w ;� z
No. v o un �_ v —
+� C Y O N L.L L L ; \ Y L.L L
ro ro ro v N a1 c \ + j A _ } O vn Ln O CO CU v
ro L L L L N N �l — O O C Y
w " w CO 75 0 0 0 0 ° a� a� +� a m " C
C O *' U U U L.L C O ^� >� L C,6LE
Q� L
Ln
� to to L L L ro ro ro O L � >� �
Q u u u u u u u u u u u u w w w = O O n O
Serrano Water District 1-021137 403.5(d) • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • x • • • • x • • • • •
SFPP, LP 1-021619 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • x x • • • • •
Shepard Bros., Inc. 1-031034 417.166. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x x • x • • • • • • • •
Sirco Industrial, Inc. 1-600706 403.5(d) x x • • • • • • • • • • • • • x x • • • • • • • x
Soldermask, Inc. 1-031341 433.17(a) • • • • • • • x x • • • • • • • • • • • • •
South Coast Circuits, Inc. (Bldg 3500 A) 1-011069 433.17(a) • • • • • x • •
South Coast Circuits, Inc. (Bldg 3506 A) 1-011030 433.17(a) • • • • x • • • x x • • • • • x x • • • • • x x • • •
South Coast Circuits, Inc. (Bldg 3512 A) 1-511365 433.17(a) • • x • • • • • • • • • • x • x • • • • • • • x x • -
South Coast Circuits, Inc. (Bldg 3524 A) 1-011054 433.17(a) • • • • x • • • x • • • • • • x • • • • • x • x x
South Coast Water 1-511405 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • x • • •
Southern California Edison#1 (Mt) 1-031014 403.5(d) • • x • • •
Southern California Edison #2 (Das) 1-031015 403.5(d) • • • • x • • •
Southern California Edison#3 (Lars) 1-031016 403.5(d) • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • •
SIPS Technologies 1-011310 433.17(a). • • • • • x x x x x x x x x -
SIPS Technologies LLC, DBA Cherry Aerosp 1-511381 433.17(a), • • x • x x x x x x • • • • • • • x x x
Stainless Micro-Polish, Inc. 1-021672 433.17(a) • • • • x • • • x x x x x
Star Manufacturing LLC, dba Commercial 1-600653 403.5(d) d+ 4. . • x
Page 13 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
4-1
> v
o
v C T Ln
O +' bA bA +� 0 W O rro (U Y
C O r�o 41 r j r j N ro N _ , ro
Y Y L
Permit ° D 2 N E c c o v
Facility Name Regulation GJ uA t n o L a w ;� z
No. v o un �_ v —
+� C Y O N L.L L L ; \ M Y L.L L
ro ro ro v N a1 c \ + j A _ } O vn Ln O CO CU v
ro L L L L N N �l - O O C Y
w " w CO 75 0 0 0 0 ° a� a� +� a m " C
C O *' U U U L.L C O ^� >� L C,6LE
Q� L
Ln
�
Q u u u u u u u u u u u u w w W 12 2 1
2 O 10 in 10
Star Powder Coating, Inc. 1-531425 433.17(a) • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • •
Statek Corporation (Main) 1-021664 469.26(a) • • • • • • • x • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Statek Corporation (Orange Grove) 1-521777 469.28(a) • • • • • • • x • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Stremicks Heritage Foods, LLC 1-021028 403.5(d) • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • •
Summit Interconnect, Inc. 1-600012 433.17(a) x • • • • • x x x x • • •
Summit Interconnect, Inc., Orange Divisio 1-600060 433.17(a) x • • x • • • • x • • • • x x x x -
Superior Plating 1-021090 433.17(a) • • • • x • • • x x • • • • x • • • x x • x
Superior Processing 1-021403 433.17(a) x • • • • • • • • x • x • x • • • • • • • • • •
Tayco Engineering, Inc. 1-031012 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x • x • • • • x x • -
Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company 1-021123 433.17(a) • • • I • x • • •
TC Cosmotronic, Inc., DBA Cosmotronic 1-571309 433.17(a) • • • • x • • • x • x • • • • x • • • • • • x • • x
Techplate, Inc. 1-021082 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • •
Thermal-Vac Technology, Inc. 1-021282 433.17(a) • • x • • • • • • • • • • x • x x x • • • • • • • • •
Timken Bearing Inspection, Inc. 1-531415 433.17(a) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Tiodize Company, Inc. 1-111132 433.17(a) • • • • x x x x x • • • • • • • x x x
Toyota Racing Development 1-071059 403.5(d) • • • • x
Transline Technology, Inc. 1-021202 433.17(a) x - x x x x x
Page 14 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2018-2019
> v
o
v C T Ln
o +' bA bA +� 0 UA O rro (U Y
C O r�o 41 r j r j N ro N _ , ro
Y Y L
Permit ° D 2 N E c c o v
Facility Name Regulation GJ uA t n o L a w ;� z
No. v o un �_ v —
a--� Y O N L.L L L ; \ Y L.L L
ro ro ro v N a1 c \ + j A _ } o vn Ln O CO CU v
ro L L L L N N �l — o o C Y
w " w CO 75 0 0 0 0 ° a� a� +� a m " C
C O *' C U U U L.L C O ^� >� L C,6LE
Q� L
Ln
� to to L L L ro ro ro O L � >� �
Q u u u u u u u u u u u u w w w = O O n v, o
Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. S-600887 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Tropitone Furniture Co., Inc. 1-141163 433.17(a) • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • •
TTM Technologies North America, LLC. (Cr 1-511366 433.17(a) • • • • x • • • x • • • • • • x • • • x • • • x x x
TTM Technologies North America, LLC. (H 1-511359 433.17(a) • • • • x • • • x • • • • • • x • • • x • • • x x x
Ultra-Pure Metal Finishing, Inc. 1-021703 433.17(a) • • • • x x x x • • • • • • x • • x • • • x x x
United Pharma, LLC 1-531418 403.5(d) x
Universal Alloy Corp. 1-021706 467.35(c) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Universal Molding Co. 1-521836 433.17(a) • • • • • • • x • • • • • x • x x • • • x
Vi-Cal Metals, Inc. 1-521846 403.5(d) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • x
Weber Precision Graphics 1-011354 403.5(d) • x • • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • •
Wilco-Placentia Oil Operator, LLC 1-521829 403.5(d) • • • • • • x • • • • • • • • • • • x • • • • • •
Winonics (Brea) 1-031035 433.17(a) • • • • x • • • x • • • • • • x x x x
Winonics, Inc. 1-021735 433.17(a) • • • • x x x +I+
x x
Page 15 of 15
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
714.962.2411
www.ocsd.com
10/2019