Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
98.09-28-2016 Board Meeting Item 22 Attachments.pdf
♦ V SARI,q 6 s 2 p 9 2 Pg C H6 THE ENP Addendum to Program Environmental Impact Report Collection System Improvement Plan SCH# 2006101018 District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project (Project No. 6-17) Prepared by: RMC Final August 2016 1136054.1 Page intentionally blank. August 2016 0 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief FINAL Table of Contents Chapter 1 Project Description..............................................................................................1-1 1.1 Project Overview...................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Purpose and Need for Project................................................................................1-1 1.2.1 Addendum Overview.............................................................................................1-1 1.2.2 Background/Need for Project.................................................................................1-2 1.2.3 Purpose of Project.................................................................................................1-3 1.3 Proposed Project...................................................................................................1-3 1.3.1 Construction Methods............................................................................................1-3 1.3.2 Equipment/Staging................................................................................................1-4 1.3.3 Project Description ................................................................................................1-4 1.4 Environmental Commitments and Mitigation Measures .........................................1-9 1.4.1 Environmental Commitments from 2007 PEIR.......................................................1-9 1.4.2 Mitigation Measures from 2007 PEIR Applicable to Proposed Project...................1-9 1.5 Permits/Approvals Required................................................................................1-16 1.6 CEQA Process/Addendum Requirements...........................................................1-16 Chapter Environmental Checklist.....................................................................................2-1 2.1 Environmental Analysis for District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief.......................................2-1 2.1.1 Aesthetics............................................................................................................2-24 2.1.2 Agriculture and Forestry......................................................................................2-24 2.1.3 Air Quality............................................................................................................2-24 2.1.4 Biological Resources...........................................................................................2-26 2.1.5 Cultural Resources..............................................................................................2-28 2.1.6 Geology and Soils ...............................................................................................2-31 2.1.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions................................................................................2-32 2.1.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials.......................................................................2-34 2.1.9 Hydrology and Water Quality...............................................................................2-35 2.1.10 Land Use and Planning .......................................................................................2-35 2.1.11 Mineral Resources...............................................................................................2-36 2.1.12 Noise...................................................................................................................2-36 2.1.13 Population and Housing.......................................................................................2-40 2.1.14 Public Services....................................................................................................2-40 2.1.15 Recreation...........................................................................................................2-41 2.1.16 Transportation and Traffic....................................................................................2-41 2.1.17 Utilities and Service Systems...............................................................................2-43 2.1.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance.....................................................................2-43 2.2 Environmental Determination...............................................................................2-44 Chapter 3 Report Preparation..............................................................................................3-1 3.1 Report Authors......................................................................................................3-1 3.1.1 Orange County Sanitation District..........................................................................3-1 3.1.2 RMC Water and Environment................................................................................3-1 References.............................................................................................................................3-1 August 2016 1 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief FINAL List of Tables Table 1-1: Phase 1 Pipeline Improvements............................................................................. 1-6 Table 1-2: Phase 2 Pipeline Improvements............................................................................. 1-7 Table 1-3: Phase 4 Pipeline Improvements............................................................................. 1-8 Table 1-4: 2007 PEIR Mitigation Measures Applicable to the District 6 Project....................... 1-9 Table 2-1: District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Project Environmental Analysis ................................2-2 Table 2-2: Construction Emissions of Criteria Pollutants.......................................................2-25 Table 2-3: Cultural Resources On or Within One-Half Mile of the Project Alignment.............2-29 Table 2-4: Project GHG Emissions and SCAQMD Threshold................................................2-33 List of Figures Figure 1-1: District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Project Alignment.................................................... 1-5 Figure 2-1: Cultural Sensitivity Map for the District 6 Project.................................................2-30 Figure 2-2: District 6 Alignment with 25-feet Vibration Notification Area................................ 2-37 Figure 2-3: Vibration Notification Area for MH130-MH140.....................................................2-38 Figure 2-4: Vibration Notification Area for MH170-MH195..................................................... 2-39 Figure 2-5: Vibration Notification Area for MH190-MH210..................................................... 2-40 Appendices Appendix A- Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan from the 2007 PEIR Appendix B - Air Quality Analysis for District 6 Project Appendix C - Biological Resources Site Walk and Landscaping Plan Appendix D - Cultural Report for the District 6 Project Appendix E - Geotechnical Report Appendix F - Hazardous Materials Database Search Appendix G - Revised Transportation Facilities Table August 2016 II 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PER District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief FINAL List of Abbreviations ADA American Disability Act AQMP Air Quality Management Plan BMP Best Management Practices CAA Clean Air Act Caltrans California Department of Transportation CARB California Air Resources Board CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CH4 Methane CIP Cast iron pipe CIP? Glared-In-Place Pipe CLSM Controlled low strength material CO2 Carbon dioxide CO2e Carbon dioxide equivalents DHS Department of Health and Safety DIP Ductile iron pipe DTSC California Department of Toxic Substances Control EIR Environmental Impact Report GHG Greenhouse gas gpd gallons per day gpm gallons per minute GWDR General waste discharge requirement HDPE High density polyethylene LF linear feet mgd million gallons per day mph Miles per hour MH Manhole MTCO2e Metric tons carbon dioxide equivalents N2O Nitrous oxide NOI Notice of Intent NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 03 ozone OCSD Orange County Sanitation District OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority PCH Pacific Coast Highway PEIR Program Environmental Impact Report PM2.5 Particulate matter<2.5 microns August 2016 III 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan FOR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief FINAL PVC Polyvinyl chloride RDMD Resources and Development Management Department SCAB South Coast Air Basin SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPCP Storm Water Pollution Control Plan SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board TRPH Total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons UV Ultraviolet VCP Vitrified clay pipe yr year August 2016 Iv 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PER District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 1 Project Description FINAL Chapter 1 Project Description 1.1 Project Overview The Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief project(District 6 Project or Project)is located in coastal Orange County and collects flow from the southern portion of the City of Costa Mesa, as well as small portions of the City of Newport Beach. The District 6 Project will replace and rehabilitate the sewer pipeline that extends from Pomona Avenue in the City of Costa Mesa and along Newport Blvd. to Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) in the City of Newport Beach. The work on the sewer pipeline will be completed using a variety of methods including pipe bursting, open-cut pipe replacement/realignment, and cured-in-place relining. Several maintenance access points will also be reconstructed or relocated. Access improvements involving surface modifications will be completed to improve safety and reduce risk when accessing the pipe for maintenance. 1.2 Purpose and Need for Project 1.2.1 Addendum Overview The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires public agencies to analyze and consider the environmental consequences of their decisions to approve development projects over which they exercise discretion.As lead agency,OCSD prepared a Program Environmental Impact Report(PEIR)for the OCSD Collection System Improvement Plan in compliance with CEQA(SCH#2006101018).In accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines,the Draft PEIR was prepared and distributed to public agencies and the general public by the OCSD on March 15, 2007, for a 45-day public review period. A Notice of Availability for public review was posted at the Orange County Clerk's Office,a public notice was published in the Orange County Register on Much 16,2007,and a Notice of Completion was filed with the State Clearinghouse of the Governor's Office of Planning and Research. The notices included a list of locations where the document was available for public review. Public comments on the Draft PEIR were also solicited at a public hearing that was held on April 3, 2007. No substantive comments on content of the Draft PEIR or significant environmental issues related to the proposed Plan were raised at the public hearing. On August 22, 2007, the County Board of Supervisors certified the PEIR, made findings, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations, adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), and approved the Collection System Improvement Plan,Job No.7-6 1.OCSD filed the Notice of Determination on August 23,2007. The District 6 Project was one of 19 collection system improvement projects analyzed in the PEIR. The Project is therefore a subsequent activity within the scope of the PEIR (CEQA Guidelines §15168). Subsequent activities in a PEIR must be examined in light of the PEIR to determine whether an additional environmental document must be prepared(CEQA Guidelines§15168(c)). During the design phase of the District 6 Project,minor changes to the project description were identified. An Addendum to a previously certified EIR is appropriate if some changes,additions,or clarifications are necessary,but no substantial new information or substantial changes to the project or circumstances would require major revisions to the previous EIR(CEQA Guidelines §§ 15168(c)(1), (c)(2); 15162; 15164). OCSD staff reviewed the PEIR and its MMRP, along with the District 6 Project details, to 1)determine whether any of the criteria requiring farther environmental review have been met,2)identify which mitigation measures in the PEIR and MMRP were applicable to the District 6 Project,and 3)consider if any topics required additional consideration. The results of this assessment are presented in Table 2-1 below. August 2016 1-1 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 1 Project Description FINAL For each CEQA resource topic, the proposed project was evaluated to assess its potential to change the degree of impact described in the PEIR.Based on this analysis,OCSD staff identified eight topics that merit additional documentation due to the time that has passed since PEIR certification: (I) agriculture and forestry; (2) air quality; (3) biological resources; (4) cultural resources; (5) geology and soils; (6) greenhouse gas emissions; (7) hazardous materials; and (8) traffic and transportation. OCSD staff has determined that the District 6 Project is within the scope of the PEIR and that none of the criteria requiring further environmental review have been met(CEQA Guidelines §15168(c); 15162). Staff has prepared this Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR,including Chapter 2, Environmental Checklist,to document that no further environmental review is required. Asset forth below, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15168(c)(3),OCSD has incorporated the feasible mitigation measures from the 2007 PEIR into the District 6 Project. 1.2.2 Background/Need for Project The 2007 PEIR assessed the potential environmental impacts of 19 proposed collection system improvement projects that together comprised the Collection System Improvement Plan. These projects were proposed to address projected system deficiencies, as the systems aged or demands on the systems changed. The objectives of the projects included: • Upgrading the systems to serve the sanitation needs of OCSD's service area through 2030, • Ensuring compliance with State General Waste Discharge Requirements (GWDR) by providing capacity adequate to prevent sewer overflows,and • Implementing projects identified in the Capital Improvement Plan to ensure system maintenance and upgrades are scheduled and completed in a timely manner. The projects in the 2007 PEIR were identified through a capacity analysis of OCSD's trunk sewer system that was undertaken as part of its 2006 Strategic Plan Update. This analysis used growth projections and flow simulations for wet and dry weather to identify areas of potential capacity deficiencies by 2030. The projects included in the 2007 PEIR are designed to address these potential capacity problems(OCSD 2007). The District 6 Project was one of the 19 proposed projects in the 2007 PEIR. As described in the 2007 PEIR, the proposed District 6 Project would address potential capacity deficiencies in the sewer trunk running from Pomona Avenue in Costa Mesa and along Newport Blvd. to PCH in Newport Beach. The District 6 Project calls for upsizing approximately 1,000 LF of pipeline from 12-inch through 16-inch to 15-inch through 22-inch pipeline using the pipe bursting method, CIPP re-lining of approximately 1,000 LF of existing 12-inch and 15-inch pipeline, constructing approximately 678 LF of 18-inch diameter pipeline to relocate/upsiu an existing 15-inch diameter pipeline that will be abandoned in place,and other improvements in the City of Newport Beach(OCSD 2007).The portion of the District 6 Project in the City of Costa Mesa would require only minor upgrades to manholes,and would not require work on the pipeline itself. August 2016 1-2 113054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 1 Project Description FINAL 1.2.3 Purpose of Project The purpose of the District 6 Project is to replace and rehabilitate the sewer trunk line in the identified area through upsizing,pipe replacement, and pipe cleaning and repair. It will also improve access to the sewer trunk through upgrades and relocation of manholes to enable OCSD to continue pipe and system maintenance,thereby ensuring continued use of pipeline and protection of human and environmental health and safety through the prevention of system failures. 1.3 Proposed Project 1.3.1 Construction Methods Pipe Bursting Pipe bursting is the replacement of an existing pipe with a new pipe that is installed through"bursting"the existing pipe. To prepare for pipe bursting,the existing pipe will be cleaned to accommodate the bursting head,but does not need to be cleaned extensively. The new, larger pipe is pulled through the existing pipe by a bursting head, which breaks apart the old pipe and pushes it into the surrounding fill while simultaneously pulling the new pipe into place.Pipe bursting requires excavation of a bursting pit on either end of the pipeline segment,approximately 8 feet x 50 feet each.Bypass pumping will be required for the normal wastewater flows during the pipe bursting process. Open Cut Open cut construction will be used for installation of the new pipeline alignment from Manhole("MH")- 155 to MH-A. Open cut requires excavating a trench along the new alignment, dewatering(discharged to OCSD sewer system),and installing the new pipe.The trench required for open cut would be approximately 4-5 feet wide,with an average required work space of 25 feet x 200 feet.Open cut installation can occur at a rate of approximately 50 feet per day. Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining CIPP lining requires a resin-impregnated liner to be pulled or inverted through the segment of the pipe to be lined. The resin is then cured over 24 hours using hot water, steam, or high-intensity UV light. CIPP lining requires bypass pumping of existing wastewater flows during installation,and extensive cleaning is necessary prior to installation. However, no trenching or other excavation should be required for CIPP lining,as it can be installed through existing manholes. Manhole Access Manhole access will be improved by adding concrete collars around existing manholes and adding maintenance vehicle pullouts in vegetated areas adjacent to manholes. Bypass Pumpina Bypass pumping is required to divert sewage flow during construction on existing sewers,including during pipe bursting and CIPP. Bypass pump stations will be located near MH-135,MH-140,MH-165(new MH- A), and two near MH-170. Bypass lines will be located on the ground surface and in shallow trenches at road crossings.Bypass pumps are typically trailer-mounted suction-lift diesel-driven pumps.Bypass Pump Station lA(near MH-165)would be the primary pumping station,while Bypass Pump Stations 113 and 1 C would redirect flows entering the system at MH-140 and MH-135. A shallow pipe trench would be constructed for discharge piping for pipe bursting activities,while bypass discharge will be routed through an existing storm drain system from MH-170 to cross under Newport Blvd.,and then pumped back into the sewer system. August 2016 1-3 113054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 1 Project Description FINAL Bypass pumping generally requires redundant pumps, full-time operation of pumps and appurtenant equipment,monitoring and maintaining water surface to avoid upstream operational problems,and various outage plans,equipment testing, and permits. As noted in OCSD contract specifications, bypass pumping should not occur during rainy months(December-March). Abandon in Place Abandon in place consists of filling the pipeline with a cementitious grout, so that it is no longer used for conveying wastewater. Wastewater flows will be routed around abandoned pipeline through newly constructed segment. 1.3.2 Equipment/Staging Equipment required for the proposed District 6 Project may include,but is not limited to:trucks,excavators, backhoes,front-end loaders,dump trucks,diesel generators,water trucks,compactors,concrete trucks,pipe bursting head, truck-mounted suction-lift diesel pumps. Staging areas would require storage of pipes, equipment,and other materials. 1.3.3 Project Description The proposed project as described here is a refined version of the District 6 Project included in the 2007 PEIR. The project description below designates which sections of the pipeline will require which construction method previously identified in the 2007 PEIR, includes a small realignment of the pipeline to provide improved pipeline access with less potential environmental impact, and provides specifics of manhole improvements.The majority of the project,including its primary construction activities,will occur in three phases as described below. Figure 1-1 shows the proposed District 6 alignment. Phase 1: MH-020 to MH-155 Phase 1 will include the section of the District 6 sewer trunk from MH-020 to MH-155. This corresponds to the southern end of the project at Newport Blvd. near Catalina Drive (MH-020) to approximately 850 feet north of the intersection of Newport Blvd. and Hospital Road (MH-155). Pipeline improvements include pipe bursting along 892 LF and 744 LF of cured-in-place-pipe lining.Manhole improvements will replace MH-025, MH-135, and MH-140 with 60-inch manholes (existing manholes are 48-inches), and modification of MH-145 and MH-155 to bring their rims flush with grade and to replace their existing frames and covers.Manhole improvements will also include replacing sidewalks and installing maintenance vehicle pullouts. Table 1-1 shows the pipeline and manhole improvements to be made in Phase 1. Three bursting pits will be excavated for pipe bursting activities—one near MH-025, one between MH-135 and MH-I40, and one near MH-145. Additionally, a coupling access pit will be excavated between MH-140 and MH-145 new the southwest comer of the intersection of Newport Blvd.and Hospital Road. August 2016 1-4 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 1 Project Description FINAL Figure 1-1: District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Project Alignment mWzooMH ZIoinHzys '� I N'VGG C � p I B'VGP ♦. ♦ � City 6t 180 1 Cosla Mesa t vt l 5 L __ __ __ MH NS Nrw'.ior1 Hr�arl -n I i . Y, " nIP MH -M N-M ys NBAH u"rli MH-105*aMli-p i.. r -lie PVC Open Cut-BBBFT li "4kT�Rul Vtom L I li Vipa tlu:Fl-J- I J J. r.,lll I.r. Rb'HDPIn PIDe Bursi-3m I I H Ill) 2 Z'b..19 GII Pry�uva r Ill August 2016 LS 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 1 Project Description FINAL Table 1.1: Phase 1 Pipeline Improvements Manhole or Pipeline Pipeline length Existing Activity Segment (LF) MH-020 72"diameter Protect in place. MH-020 to MH- 40 24"ductile Protect in place. 025 iron pipe DIP MH-025 - 48"diameter Replace with 60"diameter manhole. Replace 65' curb and sidewalk. Bursting it excavation. MH-025 to MH- 244 16" cast iron Pipe burst to install 22" high density polyethylene(HDPE) 135 pipeCIPpipe MH-135 - 48"diameter Replace with 60"diameter manhole. Replace 59'of curb and sidewalk. MH135 to MH- 300 15"vitrilled Pipe burst to 20" HPDE pipe. Bursting pit excavation. 140 clay pipe (VCP) MH-140 - 48"diameter Replace with 60"diameter manhole. Replace 53.9'of curb and sidewalk. MH-140 to MH- 348 12"VCP (120 Pipe burst to 18"HDPE.Access pit/construction 145 LF)and excavation. Remove coupling via temporary coupling 12-CIP (222 access pit. LF MH-145 - 72"diameter Replace existing 36"frame and cover with composite lockable frame and cover.Adjust rim to be flush with grade. Install sewer maintenance vehicle pullout. Remove and replace HMA dike. Burst pit excavation. MH-145 to MH- 384 12"VCP Clean and Cured-In-Place-Pipe(CIPP) lining. 150 MH-150 - 72"diameter Replace existing 36"frame and cover with composite lockable frame and cover. MH-150 to MH- 360 15"VCP Clean and CIPP lining. 155 MH-155. - 72"diameter Adjust rim to be flush with grade. Install a maintenance vehicle pullout. Remove and replace HMA dike. Footnotes: a. MH-155 activities included in both Phase 1 and Phase 2 tables. August 2016 1-6 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 1 Project Description FINAL Phase 2: MHA 55 to MH-A Phase 2 of the District 6 Project includes the start of the pipeline realignment that ultimately keeps the pipeline along the eastern shoulder of Newport Blvd. until it crosses to the western side of Newport Blvd. This new alignment begins at MH-155, which will be improved as described in Phase 1, and follows the roadway to the new MH-A. Construction of the Phase 2 portion of the new alignment will require 688 LF of open cut. This new segment of pipeline will run between the existing guardrail and the existing drainage swale within the southeastern edge of this portion of Newport Boulevard. The existing pipeline will be abandoned in place,as will the two manholes along the old alignment(MH-160 and MH-165).Abandon in place consists of filling the pipeline with a cementitious grout. Table 1-2 provides a summary of the Phase 2 pipeline and manhole improvements.Manhole improvements include constructing rolled curbs,installing maintenance vehicle pullouts,and relocating road signs. Table 1-2: Phase 2 Pipeline Improvements Manhole or Pipeline Pipeline length Existing Activity Segment (LF) MH-155- - 72"diameter Adjust rim to be flush with grade. Install a maintenance vehicle pullout. Remove and replace HMA dike. MH 155 to MH-A 688 - Open cut and install 18"polyvinyl chloride (PVC)pipe. Replace drain inlet and pipe. Remove and replace HMA dike. Remove 540' of existing guardrail and replace. Install embankment protection along swale. Remove and reinstall sign. Remove AC V-Ditch and existing drop inlet and concrete header. MH-Ab - - Install 60"diameter MH. Modify 85' of curb and install maintenance vehicle pullout. MH-160 - 72"diameter Abandon in place. Remove top 3 feet and fill structure with sand/slurry. MH-165b - 72"diameter Abandon in place or remove. If abandoned, remove top 3 feet and fill structure with sand/slu MH-155 to MH- 684 15"VCP and Abandon in place with controlled low strength material 165 16"CIP CLSM . Footnotes: a. MH-155 activities included in both Phase I and Phase 2 tables. b. MH-A activities included in both Phase 2 and Phase 3 tables. Phase 3: MH-A to MH-210 Phase 3 of the District 6 Project covers the pipeline improvements between the new MH-A to MH-185.At MH-A the new pipeline alignment rejoins the existing pipeline. The pipeline crosses Newport Blvd. from MH-A to approximately the previously abandoned MH-170,which will be removed and 20 LF of 15-inch VCP pipeline installed to connect the existing pipeline to the existing MH-170.From MH-A to the existing MH-170, the pipeline will be cleaned and lined using CIPP lining. The pipeline leaves the Caltrans right- of-way after MH-170, and runs approximately north and northwest to MH-180 new the intersection of Superior Avenue new Industrial Way and approximately west-northwest to MH-185 at 16th Street. The sections of pipeline run under parking lots, buildings, and alleys,making major construction challenging. However, analysis shows that only minor repairs are necessary in these sections of Phase 3. Spot repairs will occur as needed from MH-170 to MH-180 to address pipe issues such as cracks and laterals. August 2016 1-7 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 1 Project Description FINAL There are no pipeline improvements required between MH-180 and MH-210. This section of the pipeline runs from MH-185 at l6th Street north to Ohms Way at MH-190,along Ohms Way to Farad Street at MH- 195, and to a parking lot approximately halfway between Farad Street and West 17th Street, at MH-200. The pipeline turns east to Pomona Avenue, where both MH-205 and MH-210 are located. The District 6 sewer[rank project terminates at MH-210 on the eastern side of Pomona Avenue. Phase 3 manhole improvements include removal of the abandoned MH-170 and lining through the manhole to provide continuous pipe from MH-165 to MH-170,as well as replacement of the existing 24-inch frames and covers on MH-I80 though MH-200 and replacement of the existing 36-inch frames and covers on MH- 205 and MH-210 with locking, composite frames and covers. Table 1-3 summarizes the Phase 3 pipeline and manhole improvements. Table 1-3: Phase 4 Pipeline Improvements Manhole or Pipeline Pipeline length Existing Activity Segment (LF) MH-Aa - - Install 60"diameter MH. Modify 85'of curb and install maintenance vehicle pullout. MH-A to MH-170 249 15"CIP and Cured-in-place pipe(CIPP)lining. 15"VCP Abandoned MH- - Capped Remove. Install 20 LF 15"VCP pipe prior to CIPP 170 lining MH-A to MH-170 . MH-170 - 48" No repairs. diameter MH-170 to MH- 440 15"VCP No repairs. 175 MH-175 - 72" Replace existing 36"frame and cover with composite diameter lockable frame and cover. MH-175 to MH- 250 18"VCP Spot repair with CIPP in two locations. 180 MH-180 - 48" Replace existing frame and cover with composite diameter I lockable frame and cover MH-180 to MH- 320 18"VCP No repairs. 185 MH-185 - 48" Replace existing frame and cover with composite diameter lockable frame and cover. MH-185 to MH- Approx. 18"VCP No repairs. 210 1200 MH-190, MH- - 24"frame Replace existing frame and cover with composite 195, MH-200 and cover lockable frame and cover. MH-205 and - 36"frame Replace existing frame and cover with composite MH-210 and cover lockable frame and cover. Footnotes: a. MH-A activities included in both Phase 2 and Phase 3 tables. August 2016 1-8 113054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 1 Project Description FINAL 1.4 Environmental Commitments and Mitigation Measures 1.4.1 Environmental Commitments from 2007 PER The 2007 PEIR contains environmental commitments within the impact analysis that will be adhered to as part of project implementation. These commitments are based on compliance with local ordinances or standards to which construction projects are expected to adhere. Noise Section 3.9.2 of the 2007 PEIR describes the local ordinances that restrict the time that construction activities can occur.The project falls within the City of Newport Beach and the City of Costa Mesa.Because primary construction activities will occur within the City of Newport Beach, which contains more conservative construction hours than the City of Costa Mesa, construction activities will be limited to between the hours of 7:00 am and 6:30 pm on weekdays and 7:00 am and 6:00 pm on Saturdays,with no construction activities occurring on Sundays or federal holidays.This is in compliance with City of Newport Beach Municipal Code Ordinance No. 2001-4, Chapter 10.28, Section 10.28.040-Construction Activity Noise Regulations. Night work may be required by the City of Newport Beach in order to reduce the length of the construction schedule.If the request for night work is made,the City will make the request in writing noting the cbange from their City Ordinance. 1.4.2 Mitigation Measures from 2007 PER Applicable to Proposed Project The 2007 PEIR assessed potential impacts to 17 resource areas, the results of which are summarized in Table 2-1 below. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15168(c)(3), OCSD has incorporated the feasible mitigation measures verbatim from the 2007 PEIR into the District 6 Project as follows: Table 1-4: 2007 PEIR Mitigation Measures Applicable to the District 6 Project' 2007 PEIR Mitigation Measures Applicable to the District 6 Project Air Quality Mitigation Measure 3.2.1a: Contractors will maintain equipment engines in proper tune and operate construction equipment so as to minimize exhaust emissions. Mitigation Measure 3.2.1b: During construction,trucks and vehicles in loading or unloading queues will keep engines off,when not in use,to reduce vehicle emissions. Mitigation Measure 3.2-2: Contractors will reduce fugitive dust emissions through implementation of the following dust control measures: • Cover all trucks hauling soil,sand, or other loose materials • Apply water as necessary on all unpaved access roads, parking areas,and staging areas at construction sites • Sweep all paved access roads, parking areas,and staging areas at construction sites with sweepers • Water or apply nontoxic soil stabilizers to exposed soil stockpiles or areas disturbed by construction activities which produce dust Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph This table includes mitigation measures verbatim from the PEIR. August 2016 1-9 113W54.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 1 Project Description FINAL Bioloeical Resources Mitigation Measure 3.3-1: Evaluation of impacts to special-status plants,birds,mammals,and amphibians and reptiles will occur at the project level.Specifically,all areas of natural habitat within the footprint of proposed construction activities with potential to support special-status biological resources will be surveyed according to standard protocol. Where special-status biological resources are identified within the project footprint, appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures will be implemented. Depending on the special-status biological resources present, measures could include the following: Where rare plants are identified within the project footprint, the following avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures will be implemented: • Project design will be evaluated to determine if an exclusionary zone can be established around rare plant populations; where feasible, this will be implemented, and construction activities will be relocated or modified to avoid impact. • If rare plant populations cannot be avoided, appropriate salvage of plant propagules will be implemented, and suitable habitats for transplanting or re-establishing population will be identified and implemented. • Mitigation will include an analysis of suitability of alternative locations and identification of suitable propagation techniques. • Procurement of conservation easements will be implemented for alternative suitable habitats if the habitats are not already secured with conservation status. Where special-status nesting birds are identified within the project footprint, the following avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures will be implemented: • Project design will be evaluated to determine if a 500-foot minimum exclusionary zone can be established around active bird nests; where feasible, this will be implemented, and construction activities will be relocated or modified to avoid impact. • If nesting birds or active nest sites cannot be avoided,construction will be timed to avoid the active nesting season (February to August), and construction activities will not commence in the vicinity of nests until young have Fledged. Where special-status mammals or bat roosts are identified within the project footprint, the following avoidance, minimization,and mitigation measures will be implemented: • Project design will be evaluated to determine if a 500-foot minimum exclusionary zone can be established around active bat roosts; where feasible, this will be implemented, and construction activities will be relocated or modified to avoid impact. • Project design will be evaluated to determine if direct impacts to habitats supporting small mammals can be avoided with an exclusionary zone;where feasible,this will be implemented,and construction activities will be relocated or modified to avoid impact. • Where avoidance is not feasible,trapping or hazing of special-status mammals to remove them from the project site will be implemented, and individuals will be relocated to suitable habitat nearby; temporary fencing will be installed to prohibit species from returning to the construction zone. • If construction adjacent to bat roosts cannot be avoided,construction will be timed to avoid the parturition period(February to August),and construction activities will not commence in the vicinity of maternity roosts until young are weaned. • If construction must occur during the parturition period,then active bat roosts will be excluded prior to onset of breeding. Where special-status amphibians and reptiles are identified within the project footprint, the following avoidance, minimization,and mitigation measures will be implemented: • Project design will be evaluated to determine 0 direct impacts to habitats supporting amphibians or reptiles can be avoided with an exclusionary zone; where feasible, this will be implemented, and construction activities will be relocated or modified to avoid impact. • Where avoidance is not feasible, trapping or hazing of special-status amphibians or reptiles to remove them from the project site will be implemented,and individuals will be relocated to suitable habitat nearby; temporary fencing will be installed to prohibit species from returning to the construction zone. August 2016 1-10 113,5054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 1 Project Description FINAL Mitigation Measure 3.3-2: To avoid impacts to aquatic fisheries,best management practices will be implemented to avoid contaminant runoff from construction practices.This will include the following: • Equipment will not be operated in areas of ponded or lowing water.Stationary equipment such as motors, pumps, generators, and welders will be located a minimum of 200 feet outside aquatic and wetland habitats;construction staging areas,stockpiling,and equipment storage will be located a minimum of 200 feet outside aquatic and wetland habitats. • Construction vehicles and equipment will be checked periodically to ensure that proper working conditions with no potential for fugitive emissions of oil and other hazardous products exists. Refueling or lubrication of vehicles and cleaning of equipment, or other activities that involve open use of fuels, lubricants, or solvents,will occur in upland locations at least 200 feet away from aquatic or wetland habitats. • Temporary sediment-retention structures, hay bales, or silt fencing will be placed downstream of construction areas; sediment-retention devices will prevent sediment-laden water from draining offsite; sediment-retention devices structures will be maintained and repaired after flood events. Mitigation Measure 3.3J: Direct impacts to jurisdictional areas including wetlands generally will be avoided by identifying these communities at the project analysis level and designing project components to avoid these areas. However, if impacts to jurisdictional wetlands cannot be avoided,then the following mitigation will be implemented: • Delineation of affected jurisdictional sites will be implemented and impacts analyzed;this information will support permit applications to the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers(USAGE)under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. • A proposed mitigation plan to compensate for impacts to jurisdictional areas will be developed and approved by the USACE;it will be implemented to compensate for impacts. • To avoid indirect impacts to jurisdictional areas from contaminant runoff, Mitigation Measure 3.3-2 will be implemented. Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure 3.4.1: During preliminary design,a Registered Professional Archaeologist(RPA)will complete a literature review using the archives of the South Central Coastal Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), located at California State University Fullerton,and other sources as needed to identify previous cultural resoumes studies and previously recorded archaeological sites within close proximity to the project alignment.The literature search will also include a search of the Sacred Lands Database maintained by the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Using the results of the literature review in part, the archaeologist will develop a cultural resources sensitivity map for the project alignment,followed by a determination of specific areas of the project that may require preconstruction survey, subsurface testing, or construction monitoring. Cultuml resources identified as a result of the literature review, field survey, testing, or construction monitoring will be evaluated by a Registered Professional Archaeologist to determine whether they meet the criteria for designation as a historical resource(14 CCR§4850,PRC§21084.1.14 CCR§15064.5(3))ore"unique archeological resource" as defined in PRC§21083.2. If resources are present on state lands, Office of Historic Preservation(OHP)will be consulted (PRC § 21083.2). For sites within project alignment where human remains have been previously documented,the Sanitation District would enter into a written agreement between an archaeological consultant,to be retained by the Sanitation District, and a Native American representative prior to construction in the vicinity of these sites.This agreement would specify terms as to the treatment and disposition of the human remains,and will define "associated burial goods"with reference to PRC § 5097.94, 5097.98, and 5097.99 and Health and Safety Code§7050.5. Mitigation Measure 3.4-2a: Subsurface construction has the potential for exposing significant subsurface cultural resources.Due to the likelihood of encountering cultural resources,the Sanitation District will implement the following prior to commencement of construction activities: • Prior to construction,contractors,and Sanitation District staff will receive an archaeological orientation from a professional archaeologist regarding the types of resources that could be uncovered during construction activities and the identification of these resources.The orientation also will cover procedures to follow in the case of any archaeological discovery. August 2016 1.11 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 1 Project Description FINAL Mitigation Measure 3.4-2b: If cultural resources are encountered at any time during project excavation,construction personnel will avoid altering these materials and their context until a qualified archaeologist has evaluated the situation. Project personnel will not collect or retain cultural resources. Prehistoric resources include,but are not limited to,chart or obsidian flakes, projectile points,mortars and pestles,dark friable soil containing shell and bone,dietary debris, heat-affected rock, or human burials.Historic resources include stone or adobe foundations orwalls;structures and remains with square nails,and refuse deposits(glass,metal,wood,ceramics)often found in old wells and privies. Mitigation Measure 3.4-2c: In the event of accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the county coroner will be notified immediately, and construction activities will be halted. If the remains are found to be Native American,the Native American Heritage Commission will be notified within 24 hours. Guidelines of the Native American Heritage Commission will be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. Geoloav and Soils Mitigation Measure 3.5-1: The Sanitation District will design and construct new facilities in accordance with Sanitation District standards and/or applicable building codes. Mitigation Measure 3.5-2: Soil surveys will be conducted to determine the liquefaction potential along the collection system improvement routes. Pipelines will be installed within consolidated,engineered backfll. Hazards and Hazardous Materials= Mitigation Measure 3.6-1: Transportation of hazardous materials will be in accordance with all federal,state,and local regulations. Mitigation Measure 3.6-2: Prior to storage of hazardous materials,a Hazardous Materials Inventory and Business Emergency Plan will be fled with the Orange County Fire Authority. Mitigation Measure 3.63: In the event of an accidental spill, containment and cleanup will occur in conformance with the spill response and waste disposal procedures identified in the Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)and in the Business Emergency Plan. Mitigation Measure 3.6-4: Disposal of hazardous waste generated as part of construction or operation activities will occur at a properly penni ted facility in accordance with federal and stale laws. Mitigation Measure 3.6-6: During project design, a database screening would be completed for listing of all known contamination sites, including contamination associated with leaking underground storage tanks. Additionally,soils sampling would be completed for the presence of total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons(TRPH),volatile organics, and metals. In the event of suspected contamination from adjacent land uses,soil sampling would be completed to verify hazardous substances. Under the Sanitation District's standard construction specifications, the Sanitation District and its contractors would comply with all applicable regulatory requirements for the assessment, testing, remediation, removal,and disposal of hazardous wastes/materials. Hydrology and water Qualitv° Mitigation Measure 3.7-1: Prior to the initiation of ground-disturbing activities for sewer improvements with surface disturbances of 1 acre or more, the Sanitation District(or its designee)will obtain approval from the State Water Resources Control Board State Board under the National Pollutant Dischar a Elimination System NPDES General Permit for Dischar es 'Note:Mitigation Measure 3.5-3 not applicable because the District 6 Project is not located in a peat bog. Note:Mitigation Measure 3.6-5a and 3.6-5b not applicable because the District 6 Project is located within areas that have been excavated for previous utilities installation and no evidence of previous oil production has been found during previous work along this alignment. 4 Note:Mitigation Measure 3.7-2 not applicable because the District 6 Project activities will not take place within a jurisdictional area. August 2016 1-12 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 1 Project Description FINAL of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity(General Permit). This includes submitting a Notice of Intent (NOI)to the State Board and developing and implementing a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP).For sewer improvements with less than 1 acre of surface disturbances, the Sanitation District (or its designee) will develop and implement a Slormwater Pollution Control Plan(SWPCP)prior to initiating ground-disturbing activities. The SWPPP or SWPCP will identify potential sources of sediment and other pollutants that could affect the quality of the slormwater discharge, and will specify best management practices (BMPs) to prevent or minimize the introduction of sediment and pollutants into surface waters from a construction site. BMP methods of erosion and sediment control might include straw bales, silt fences, and other control techniques. Monitoring and maintenance requirements will be specified in the SWPPP or SWPCP. Mitigation Measure 3.7.3: Prior to the initiation of construction dewatenng activities the Sanitation District (or its designee) will obtain authorization from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and will comply with the NPDES Permit No. CAG998001,General Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges to Surface Waters that Pose an Insignificant (De Minimus)Threat to Water Quality,for insignificant discharges to surface water bodies, including but not limited to discharge of dewatered groundwater. Land Use and Planning Mitigation Measure 3.8.1: The Sanitation District will provide notices of construction to adjacent property owners, including businesses and places of worship, prior to initiating construction activities. Notices of construction will include a contact and telephone number of Sanitation District staff that can be contacted regarding questions or concerns about construction activities. Mitigation Measure 3.8-2: The Sanitation District will coordinate with officials of adjacent fire stations, police stations,and hospitals to ensure that 24-hour emergency access is available. Mitigation Measure 3.8-3: To minimize disruption of access to driveways of adjacent land uses including schools during construction, the Sanitation District(or its contractor)will maintain steel trench plates to provide vehicle access across trenches. Mitigation Measure 3.8-4: To minimize disruption to adjacent businesses during construction, the Sanitation District will provide temporary signage indicating that businesses are open. Noise Mitigation Measure 3.9-1: To minimize noise disruption during construction,construction activities will generally be scheduled to occur during times allowed by applicable codes, noise ordinances or permits. Additionally, the following mitigations could be implemented as required: • Noise reduction measures such as sound blankets or temporary sound walls could be used to reduce noise generation from stationary noise generating equipment during construction. • Stationary noise generating equipment such as generators could be placed within the jacking pits where possible to reduce noise during construction. • Pile driving activities or other particularly disruptive construction could be limited to specific limes agreed to with agencies of jurisdiction or adjacent property owners prior to construction. • Where appropriate, noise monitoring at the closest sensitive receptors could be conducted and reports submitted to the city of jurisdiction. Mitigation Measure 3.9.2: Project level review will be completed and will identify specific areas susceptible to groundborne vibration. For such identified areas, construction notification would occur and construction activities would be limited to times allowed by applicable codes,noise ordinances or permits. Public Services Mitigation Measure 3.11-1: The contractor will provide a copy of the Traffic Control Plan to the Sheriffs Department, local police departments, and fire departments prior to construction.The Sanitation District will provide 72-hour notice of construction to the local service providers of individual pipeline segments. August2016 1-13 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 1 Project Description FINAL Mitigation Measure 3.11-2: Access to fire stations and emergency medical facilities will be maintained on a 24-hour basis, and at least one access to medical facilities will be available at all times during construction. The Sanitation District will notify appropriate officials at the medical facility regarding construction schedule. Mitigation Measure 3.11-3a: Construction areas will be secured or trenches will be backfilled promptly after pipeline installation. If installation is incomplete,steel trench plates will be used to cover open trenches as appropriate for the specific site. Mitigation Measure 3.11-3b: Construction contractors will ensure that adequate barriers are established to prevent pedestrians from entering the open trenches of an active construction area. Warnings will be posted sufficient distances from the work area to allow pedestrians to cross the street at controlled intersections. Mitigation Measure 3.11-3c: To ensure aesthetic consistency and public safety, construction contractors will restore disturbed areas along the alignment as mutually agreed by the Sanitation District and local jurisdictions prior to construction. Mitigation Measure 3.11.4: Construction contractors will be responsible for providing appropriate security measures for all equipment staging and/or storage areas needed for sewer improvement projects. Mitigation Measure 3.116a: Construction contractors will dispose of construction refuse at approved disposal locations. Contractors will not be permitted to dispose of construction debris in residential or business containers. Mitigation Measure 3.116b: Construction contractors will be required to keep construction and staging areas orderly,free of trash and debris. Mitigation Measure 3.11.6a: A detailed study identifying utilities along the pipeline routes will be conducted during the design stages of sewer improvement projects.For segments with potential adverse impacts,the following mitigations will be implemented. • Utility excavation or encroachment permits will be required from the appropriate agencies.These permits include measures to minimize utility disruption.The Sanitation District and its contractors will comply with permit conditions,and such conditions will be included in construction contract specifications. • Utility locations will be verified through field surveys. • Detailed specifications will be prepared as part of the design plans to include procedures for the excavation, support, and fill of areas around utility cables and pipes. All affected utility services will be notified of Sanitation District construction plans and schedule. Arrangements will be made with these entities regarding protection, relocation, or temporary disconnection of services. Mitigation Measure 3.116b: To reduce potential impacts associated with utility conflicts, the following measures will be implemented in conjunction with 3.11-6a. • Disconnected cables and lines will be promptly reconnected. • The Sanitation District will observe Department of Health and Safety(DHS)standards,which require a 10- foot horizontal separation between parallel sewer and water mains and 1-foot vertical separation between perpendicular water and sewer line crossings. In the event that the separation requirements cannot be maintained, the Sanitation District will obtain DHS variance through provisions of water encasement, or other means deemed suitable by DHS, and by encasing water mains in protective sleeves where a new sewer force main crosses under or over an existing sewer main. Mitigation Measure 3.116c: The construction contractor will comply with Sanitation District requirements and specifications to protect existing utility lines. Mitigation Measure 3.11-7: The Sanitation District shall coordinate with the Orange County Resources and Development Management Department(RDMD)and other jurisdictions as required to ensure compatibility and joint-use feasibility with existing and future projects. August 2016 1.14 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 1 Project Description FINAL Transportation and Traffics Mitigation Measure 3.12-1a: Traffic control plans will be prepared by a qualified professional engineer as required prior to the construction phase of each sewer line project. Mitigation Measure 3.12-lb: Traffic control plans will consider the ability of alternative routes to carry additional traffic and will identify the least disruptive hours of construction, site truck access routes, and the type and location of warning signs, lights, and other traffic control devices. Consideration will be given to maintaining access to commercial parking lots, private driveways, sidewalks, bikeways,and equestrian trails to the greatest extent feasible. Mitigation Measure 3.12.1c: Encroachment permits for all work within or adjacent to public rights-of-way will be obtained from each appropriate agency prior to commencement of any construction.Agencies could include California Department of Transportation (Caltrans),RDMD and the various city agencies where work will occur.The Sanitation District will comply with traffic control requirements,as identified by Caltrans and the affected local jurisdictions. Mitigation Measure 3.12-1d: Traffic control plans will comply with the Work Area Traffic Control Handbook and/or the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as determined by each affected local agency, to minimize any traffic and pedestrian hazards that exist during project construction. Mitigation Measure 3.12-le: Public roadways will be restored to their existing condition after project construction is completed. Mitigation Measure 3.12.1f: The Sanitation District will attempt to schedule construction of relief facilities to occur jointly with other public works projects already planned in the affected locations,through careful coordination with all local agencies involved. Mitigation Measure 3.12.1g: Emergency service purveyors will be contacted and consulted to preclude the creation of unnecessary traffic bottlenecks that will seriously impede response times.Additionally,measures to provide an adequate level of access to private properties will be maintained to allow delivery of emergency services. Mitigation Measure 3.12.1h: Orange County Transportation Authority will be contacted when construction affects roadways that are part of the OCTA bus transit network.Adequate procedures will be implemented to keep bus routes and station accessible to users. Mitigation Measure 3.12-11: Construction traffic,mainly trucks,will be routed in a way to minimize impacts to sensitive neighborhoods.In addition, storage and staging of materials and equipment will be done after obtaining a Temporary Use Permit,when needed. Mitigation Measure 3.12-1j: An effort will be made to solicit input from residents in the neighborhoods of the proposed improvements. These inputs will be considered in the planning phase through construction to mitigate the residenfa concems. Mitigation Measure 3.12.2a: Where lane closures are necessary for construction of sewer improvement projects,all construction equipment will be staged within the closed lanes or in staging areas outside of city streets. Mitigation Measure 3.12.2b: Where lane or road closures are necessary for construction of sewer improvement projects, adequate signage will be provided informing local residents and business owners of construction activities prior to commencement of construction activities. Mitigation Measure 3.12.2c: Where lane or road closures are necessary for construction of sewer improvement projects, cones and/or traffic guards will be used to clearly indicate the locations and directions of temporarily altered traffic lanes. Mitigation Measure 3.12-2d: The construction technique for implementation of the proposed sewer lines,such as tunneling, cut-and-cover with partial street closure,or cut-and-cover with full street closure,will include consideration of the ability of the roadway system,both the street in question and alternate routes,to carry existing traffic volumes during project construction. August 2016 1-15 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 1 Project Description FINAL If necessary,adjacent parallel streets will be selected as alternate alignments for the proposed sewer improvements. As required by local jurisdictions, trunk sewers will be jacked under select major intersections to avoid traffic disruption and congestion. Mitigation Measure 3.12-2e: Public streets generally will be kept operational during construction, particularly in the morning and evening peak hours of traffic. Lane closures will be minimized during peak traffic hours. Mitigation Measure 3.12.2f: Where road closures are necessary for construction of sewer improvement projects,signage will be posted informing motorists of road closures and delineating suitable detours, both prior to and during the duration of construction activities. Prior to initiating a road closure,coordination with local jurisdictions,including Caltrans,will occur. 1.5 Permits/Approvals Required Encroachment permits will be required from Caltrans and the City of Newport Beach, while a flood encroachment permit will be required from the Orange County Department of Public Works Flood Control District. Permits will require traffic control plans in addition to the permit applications and materials. Permits generally take between 2 and 8 weeks for local agency review and 2 to 3 months for Caltrans review,but may take longer depending on the size of the project. 1.6 CEQA Process/Addendum Requirements The cnviromnental checklist below was prepared to evaluate the potential effects of the revised District 6 Project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15168(c)and 15162. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15168(c): "Subsequent activities in the program must be examined in the light of the program EIR to determine whether an additional environmental document must be prepared. (1) If a later activity would have effects that were not examined in She program EIR, a new Initial Study would need to be prepared leading to either an EIR or a Negative Declaration. (2) If the agency finds that pursuant to Section 15162, no new effects could occur or no new mitigation measures would be required, the agency can approve the activity as being within the scope of the project covered by the program EIR, and no new environmental document would be required. The conditions in CEQA Guidelines §15162 include the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity ofpreviously identfed significant effects; or (3) New information ofsubstantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted,shows any of the following: Note:Mitigation Measure 3.12-lk not applicable because District 6 Project activities will not occur within a railroad right of way. August 2016 1-16 113W54.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B) Signifcant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or akernative;or (D)Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15164(a): "A lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred." Based on the analysis in the environmental checklist,OCSD determined that none of the criteria requiring farther environmental review were met,and that an Addendum to the 2007 PEIR was appropriate pursuant to CEQA Guidelines§I5164.Specifically,OCSD determined that(1)the revised District 6 Project does not propose substantial changes to the project as described in the 2007 PEIR, (2) the District 6 Project would not create any new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of significant effects identified in the 2007 PEIR, and(3)the mitigation measures in the 2007 PEIR would be sufficient to address any potential environmental impacts of the District 6 Project. Since adoption of the 2007 PEER,the CEQA Guidelines have added a requirement to analyze greenhouse gas(GHG)impacts,which has been completed for the District 6 Project.These changes have been included in this Addendum. Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist 2.1 Environmental Analysis for District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief This chapter acts as the Environmental Checklist for the revised District 6 Project. Table 2-1 indicates,by resource area, the original findings of the 2007 PEIR and the findings for the revised District 6 Project. Applicable mitigation measures from the 2007 PEER are listed,with descriptions of each mitigation measure found in Section 1.4.1, above. A discussion describing the justification for each finding is also provided following the table. For those resources areas where additional information or analysis was completed for this Addendum, additional discussion is included in the justification discussion. For those thresholds that were identified as less-than-significant or no impact in the Initial Study (Appendix B of the PEIR), no additional analysis was completed in the PEIR. The PEIR Impact Statement column says"N/A"for these thresholds. Findings are described using the following abbreviations: No Impact Less-than- Less-than-sgnficant with Significant and unavoidable significant mitigation with mitigation August 2016 2-1 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL Table 2.1: District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Project Environmental Analysis I.a Would Have a substantial adverse effect N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A on a scenic vista? B:3-1 lb Substantially Damage scenic N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A resources,including,but not limited B:3-1 to,trees, rock outcroppings,and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? I.c Substantially degrade the existing N/A LTS LTS Appendix No No No N/A visual character or quality of the B:3-1 site and its surroundings? Ld Create a new source of substantial N/A LTS LTS Appendix No No No N/A light or glare which would adversely B:3-1 affect day or nighttime views in the area? 2. Agriculture and Forestry Would the Project. L Convert Prime Farmland, Unique N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A Farmland,or Farmland of B:3-2 Statewide Importance(Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to nona ricultuml use? August 2016 2-2 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL NO substantial CIECIA Appendix G Threshold PEIR Impact importance Statement that would result in new REM== impacts, 11111,1111TITT-TITIM mitigation,or MMMMV� alternatives? Il,b Conflict with existing zoning for N/A NI NI Appendix No No No PN/A agricultural use,or Williamson B:3-2 Act contract? I1.0 Conflict with existing zoning for,or N/A N/A NI N/A No No No N/A cause rezoning of,forest land(as (see additional defined in Public Resources Code discussion section 12220(g)),timberland(as following this defined by Public Resources Code table) section 4526),or timberland zoned Timberland Production(as defined by Government Code section 51104 7 lid Result in the loss of forest land or N/A N/A NI N/A No No No N/A conversion of forest land to non- forest use? Il.e Involve other changes in the N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A existing environment which,due to B:3-2 their location or nature,could result in conversion of Farmland,to non- agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? 3. Air Quality Would the Project. IILa Conflict with or obstruct N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A implementation of the applicable air B: 3-3 (see additional quality plan? discussion following this table August 2016 2-3 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL substantial importance Statement that would REM== impacts, MMEEGM� - mitigation,or nlm�m alternatives? Ill.b Violate any air quality standard or Impact 3.2-1: SU-M LTS-M 3-10 No No No q contribute substantially to an Construction activities (see (see additional existing or projected air quality would generate NOX additional discussion . violation? emissions in discussion following this 3.2-11b exceedance of the following table) daily significance this table) threshold resulting in a short-term impact to air quality. Impact 3.2-2: LTS-M LTS-M 3-10 No No No Mitigation Construction activities (see additional Measure would produce discussion 3.2-2 fugitive dust following this emissions resulting in table) a short-term impact to air quality. Ill.c Result in a cumulatively N/A LTS LTS 3-10 to 3- No No No N/A considerable net increase of any 12 (see additional criteria pollutant for which the discussion project region is non-attainment following this under an applicable federal or state table) ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Ill.d Expose sensitive receptors to N/A LTS LTS 3-12 No No No N/A substantial pollutant (see additional concentrations? discussion following this table IlLe Create objectionable odors N/A LTS LTS 3-12 No No No N/A affecting a substantial number of (see additional people? discussion August 2016 24 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL LER substantial importance mp-ctJ S that would Statement result in new REM== impacts, mitigation,or following this table) 4 Biological Would the Project: — IV.a Have a substantial adverse effect, Impact 3.3-1:Areas LTS-M LTS-M 3-18 No No No Mitigation either directly or through habitat of natural habitat (see additional Measure modifications,on any species within the footprint of discussion 3.3-1 identified as a candidate,sensitive, proposed activities following this or special status species in local or could impact special- table) regional plans,policies,or status biological regulations,or by the California resources. Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? IV.b Have a substantial adverse effect Impact 3.3-2:Runoff LTS-M LTS-M 3-21 No No No Mitigation on any riparian habitat or other from construction (see additional Measure sensitive natural community activities could impact discussion 3.3-2 identified in local or regional plans, aquatic fisheries. following this policies,regulations or by the table) California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? IV.c Have a substantial adverse effect Impact 3.3-3:Project LTS-M LTS-M 3-21 No No No Mitigation on federally protected wetlands as activities within (see additional Measure defined by Section 404 of the jurisdictional areas, discussion 3.3-3 Clean Water Act(including,but not including wetlands, following this limited to, marsh,vernal pool, would result in table) coastal,etc.)through direct impacts to biological removal,filling, hydrological resouri interruption,or other means? August 2016 2-5 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL substantial importance Statement that would REM== impacts, EMEEGM� - mitigation,or nlm�m alternatives? IV.d Interfere substantially with the N/A NI NI Appendix No No No PN/A movement of any native resident or B: 3-5 (see additional migratory fish or wildlife species or discussion with established native resident or following this migratory wildlife corridors,or table) impede the use of native wildlife nuri sites? IV.e Conflict with any local policies or N/A NI ENI Appendix No No No N/A ordinances protecting biological B:3-5 resources,such as a tree reservation policyor ordinance? IV.f Conflict with the provisions of an N/A NIAppendix No No No N/A adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, B:3-5 Natural Community Conservation Plan,or other approved local, regional,or stale habitat conservation Ian? 5. Cultural Would the Project: V.a Cause a substantial adverse N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A change in the significance of a B:3-6 (see additional historical resource as defined in§ discussion 1501 following this table Via Cause a substantial adverse Impact 3.4-1:Project LTS-M LTS-M 335 No No No Mitigation change in the significance of an activities could affect (see additional Measures archaeological resource pursuant known,significant discussion 3.4-1 to§ 15064.5? archaeological, following this paleontological,and table) historical resources V.c Directly or indirectly destroy a See Impact 3.4-1 LTS-M LTS-M 3-36 No No No Mitigation unique paleontological resource or (see additional Measures site or unique geologic feature? I discussion 3.4-1 August 2016 2-6 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL result in new substantial importance CEQA Appendix G Threshold PEIR Impact that would Statement REM== impacts, EMEEGMM mitigation,or following this table V.d Disturb any human remains, Impact 3.4-2: LTS-M LTS-M 3-36 No No No Mitigation including those interred outside of Construction (see additional Measures formal cemeteries? excavation could discussion 3.4-2a,3.4- expose,encounter,or following this 2b,3.4-2c accidentally discover table) cultural resources, including buried human remains. Woul the Project vi.a.ii• Expose people or structures to Impact 3.5-1:Project LTS-M LTS-M 3-41 and No No No Mitigation potential substantial adverse facilities would be 3-42 (see additional Measure effects, including the risk of loss, located in areas discussion 3.5-1 injury,or death involving: susceptible to following this -Rupture of a known earthquake seismicity and table) fault,as delineated on the most groundshaking. recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 Vi.a.ii Strong seismic groundshaking See Impact 3.5-1 LTS-M LTS-M 3-41 and No No No Mitigation 3-42 (see additional Measure discussion 3.5-1 following this table August 2016 2-7 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL substantial EIR impact CIECIA Appendix G Threshold PEIR AImpact importance Statement that would suit in new REM== impacts, EMEEGMM mitigation,or 11111111MI�. alternatives? VI.a.iii Seismic-related ground failure, Impact 3.5-2:Project LTS-M LTS-M 3-41 and No No No Mitigation including liquefaction? facilities could be 3-42 (see additional Measure placed in areas with discussion 3.5-2 the potential for following this liquefaction. table VI.a.iv Landslides? N/A LTS LTS Appendix No No No N/A B:3-8 Vl.b Result in substantial soil erosion or N/A LTS LTS Appendix No No No N/A the loss of topsoil? B:3-8 Vl.c Be located on a geologic unit or soil Impact 3.5-3:Project LTS-M LTS 15401 No No No N/A that is unstable,or that would facilities could be (see additional become unstable as a result of the placed in soils discussion project,and potentially result in on susceptible to following this or off-site landslide,lateral settlement. table) spreading,subsidence,liquefaction or collapse? VIA Be located on expansive soil,as N/A LTS LTS Appendix No No No N/A defined in Table 18-1-B of the B:3-9 (see additional Uniform Building Code(1994), discussion creating substantial risks to life or following this property? table Vl.e Have soils incapable of adequately N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A supporting the use of septic tanks B:3-9 or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? August 2016 2-8 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL Location Substantial New of where changosin Substantial information of Prior Project's the project changesinthe substantial mitigation PEIR Impact 2007 Adden involving circumstances importance measures CEQA Appendix G Threshold Statement PEIR dum Impa a new underwhich that would from 2007 Finding Finding were addressed significant or the project is result in new PEIR that in 2007 substantially being impacts, address PEIR more sever undertaken? mitigation,or impact impacts? alternatives? 7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Project.- Vila Generate greenhouse gas N/A LTS N/A No No No N/A emissions,either directly or (see additional indirectly,that may have a discussion significant impact on the following this environment? table Vll.b Conflict with an applicable plan, N/A LTS N/A No No No N/A policy or regulation adopted for the (see additional purpose of reducing the emissions discussion of greenhouse gases? following this table It. Hazards and Hazardous Materials VII I the Project.- Would.a Create a significant hazard to the Impact 3.6-1: LTS-M LTS-M 3-44 No No No Mitigation public or the environment through Transportation of Measure the routine transport,use,or hazardous materials 3.6-1 disposal of hazardous materials? associated with Project activities could result in a hazards and hazardous materials related impact. Impact 3.6-2:Storage LTS-M LTS-M 3-45 No No No Mitigation of hazardous Measure materials associated 3.6-2 with Project activities could result in a hazards and hazardous materials related impact. August 2016 2-9 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL substantial ER impact CIECIA Appendix G Threshold Lt importance Statement that would result in new REM= impacts, EMEEGMM mitigation,or lmlm� alternatives? Impact 3.6-5: LTS-M NI 3-45 No No No N/A Improperly (see abandoned oil wells additional may exist within discussion excavation following ali nments this table Impact 3.6-6: LTS-M LTS-M 345 No No No Mitigation Construction activities Measure could encounter 3.6-5a and areas of 3.6-51b contamination, including contamination associated with leaking underground storage tanks. Vlll.b Create a significant hazard to the Impact 3.6-3: LTS-M LTS-M 3-45 No No No Mitigation public or the environment through Accidental spill of Measure reasonably foreseeable upset and hazardous materials 3.6-3 accident conditions involving the associated with release of hazardous materials into Project activities the environment? could result in a hazards and hazardous materials related impact. Impact 3.6-4: LTS-M LTS-M 3-45 No No No Mitigation Improper disposal of Measure hazardous materials 3.6-4 could result in a hazards and hazardous materials related impact. August 2016 2-10 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL substantial CEQA Appendix G Threshold PEIR Impact importance Statement that would result in new REM== impacts, MMEEGM� - mitigation,or MMM�M alternatives? Vlll.c Emit hazardous emissions or Impact statements LTS-M NI 3-45 No No No N/A handle hazardous or acutely 3.6-1 through 3.6-4 (see hazardous materials,substances, could all occur within additional or waste within one-quarter mile of one-quarter mile of an discussion an existing or proposed school? existing or proposed following school. this table VIIIA Be located on a site which is N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A included on a list of hazardous B:3-10 materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and,as a result,would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Vlll.e For a project located within an N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A airport land use plan or,where B:3-10 such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Vlll.f For a project within the vicinity of a N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A private airstrip,would the project B:3-10 result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Vlll.g Impair implementation of or See Impact 3.11-A LTS-M LTS-M 3-45;3-85 No No No Mitigation physically interfere with an adopted and Impact 3.11-2 through 3- Measures emergency response plan or 86 3.11-1 and surer enc evacuation Ian? 3.11-2 Vlll.h Expose people or structures to a N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A significant risk of loss, injury or B:3-11 August 2016 2-11 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL substantial EIR impact CIECIA Appendix G Threshold PEIR AImpact importance Statement that would suit in new REM== impacts, MMEEGMM - mitigation,or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? 9 Hydrology and Water Quality Would the Project: IX.a Violate any water quality standards Impact 3.7-1: LTS-M LTS-M 3-49 No No No Mitigation or waste discharge requirements? Construction activities Measure could result in erosion 3.7-1 and siltation related stormwater impacts to surface water quality. Impact 3.7-2:Project LTS-M NI 3-49 and No No No N/A activities within (see 3-22 jurisdictional areas, additional including wetlands, discussion would result in following impacts to biological this table) resources. Construction activities could also result in impacts to jurisdictional areas associated with equipment refueling and vehicle use. August 2016 2-12 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL substantial CIECIA Appendix G Threshold PEIR Impact importance Statement that would result in new mitigation,or 101M�M alternatives? IX.b Substantially deplete groundwater N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A supplies or interfere substantially B.3-11 with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level(e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been grani Me Substantially alter the existing N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A drainage pattern of the site or area, B:3-11 including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? IX.d Substantially alter the existing N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A drainage pattern of the site or area, B:3-12 including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in floodin on-or offsite? Me Create or contribute runoff water N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A which would exceed the capacity of B:3-12 existing or planned stonnwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? August 2016 2-13 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL substantial CEQA Appendix G Threshold PEIR Impact importance Statement that would result in new REM== impacts, MMEEGM� - mitigation,or mlm�m alternatives? IX.f Otherwise substantially degrade Impact 3.7-3: LTS-M LTS-M 3-49 No No No PMeasure water quality? Construction dewatering . - discharges could result in impacts to surface water quality. IX.g Place housing within a 100-year N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A flood hazard area as mapped on a B:3-12 federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? IX.h Place within a 100-year flood N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A hazard area structures which would B:3-12 im ede or redirect flood flows? IX.i Expose people or structures to a N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A significant risk of loss, injury or B:3-12 death involving flooding,including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? IX.j Inundation by seiche,tsunami,or N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A mudflow? B:3-13 10. Land Use and Planning Would the Project X.a Physically divide an established N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A communi o B:3-13 X.b Conflict with any applicable land Impact 3.8-1: LTS-M LTS-M 3-54,Table No No No Mitigation use plan, policy,or regulation of an Construction activities 3-3. 359 Measure agency with jurisdiction over the could impact adjacent 3.8-1 project(including,but not limited to property owners, the general plan,specific plan, including businesses local coastal program,or zoning and places of ordinance)adopted for the purpose worship. August 2016 2-14 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL substantial ER I Impactl CIECIA Appendix G Threshold Lit 093E=M importance Statement that would result in new REM== impacts, EMEEGMM mitigation,or lmlm� alternatives? of avoiding or mitigating an Impact 3.8-2: LTS-M LTS-M 3-54,Table No No No Mitigation environmental effect? Construction activities 3-3, 3-59 Measure could affect 24-hour 3.8-2 emergency access at adjacent fire stations, police stations,and hospitals. Impact 3.8-3: LTS-M LTS-M 3-54,Table No No No Mitigation Construction activities 3-3, 3-59 Measure could result in 3.8-3 disruption of access to adjacent land uses including schools. Impact 3.8-4: LTS-M LTS-M 354,Table No No No Mitigation Construction activities 3-3. 359 Measure could result in 3.8-3 disruption to adjacent businesses. X.c Conflict with any applicable habitat N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A conservation plan or natural B:3-13 communIN conservation Ian? 11. Mineral Resources Would the Project: Xl.a Result in the loss of availability of a N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A known mineral resource that would B:3-14 be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Xl.b Result in the loss of availability of a N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A locally important mineral resource B:3-14 recovery site delineated on a local general plan,specific plan or other land useplan? August 2016 2.15 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL Location Substantial New of where changosin Substantial information of Prior Project's the project changesinthe substantial mitigation PEIR Impact 2007 Adden involving circumstances importance measures CIECIA Appendix G Threshold Statement PEIR dum Impa a new underwhich that would from 2007 Finding Finding were addressed significant or the project is result in new PEIR that in 2007 substantially being impacts, address PEIR more sever undertaken? mitigation,or impact impacts? alternatives? 12. Noise Would the Project. Xll.a Exposure of persons to or Impact 3.9-1: SU-M LTS-M 3-67 No No No Mitigation generation of noise levels in excess Constmctkm activities Measure of standards established in the could result in short- 3.9-1 local general plan or noise term noise disruptions ordinance,or applicable standards to surrounding areas. of other agencies? Xll.b Exposure of persons to or Impact 3.9-2: LTS-M LTS-M 3-67 No No No Mitigation generation of excessive Construction activities Measure groundborne vibration or could expose persons 3.9-2 groundborne noise levels? to,or generate, groundborne vibration. Xll.c A substantial permanent increase See Impact 3.9-1 NI NI 3-67 No No No Mitigation in ambient noise levels in the Measure project vicinity above levels existing 3.9-1 without theproject? Xll.d A substantial temporary or periodic See Impact 3.9-1 LTS-M LTS 3-67 No No No Mitigation increase in ambient noise levels in Measure the project vicinity above levels 3.9-1 existing without theproject? Xll.e For a project located within an See Impact 3.9-1 LTS-M NI 3-59 No No No Mitigation airport land use plan or,where (see Measure such a plan has not been adopted, additional 3.9-1 within two miles of a public airport discussion or public use airport,would the following project expose people residing or this table) working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Xll.f For a project within the vicinity of a See Impact 3.9-1 LTS-M NI 3-59 No No No N/A private airstrip,would the project (see expose peoole residdinq orworkinq 1 additional August 2016 2-16 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL substantial CIECIA Appendix G Threshold LPEIR Impact importance Statement that would result in new REM== impacts, MMEEGM� mitigation,or in the project area to excessive discussion noise levels? following his table 13. Population and Housing Would the Project. Xlll.a Induce substantial population N/A LTS LTS 3-73 to 3- No No No N/A growth in an area,either directly 74 (for example,by proposing new homes and businesses)or indirectly(for example,through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Xlll.b Displace substantial numbers of N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A existing housing,necessitating the B:3-16 construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Xlll.c Displace substantial numbers of N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A people,necessitating the B:3-16 construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 14. Public Services WoulXIV ' the Project: .a Would the project result in Impact 3.11-1:Traffc LTS-M LTS-M 3-76 to 3- No No No Mitigaton substantial adverse physical impacts associated 78 Measure impacts associated with the with construction 3.11-1 provision of new or physically activities could impact altered governmental facilities, police departments, need for new or physically altered fire departments, governmental facilities,the local service construction of which could cause providers,and significant environmental impacts, schools. August 2016 2-17 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL substantial CIECIA Appendix G Threshold PEIR Impact importance Statement that would result in new mitigation,or REM== impacts, [� A N alternatives? in order to maintain acceptable Impact 3.11-2: LTS-M LTS-M 3-76 to 3- No No No PM�easure service ratios,response times or Construction activities 78 other performance objectives for could impact access . - any of the public services: to fire stations and • Fire Protection emergency medical • Police Protection facilities. • Schools Impact 3.11-3:Open LTS-M LTS-M 3-76 to 3- No No No Mitigation • Parks trenches associated 78 Measures • Other public facilities with construction 3.11-3a, activities could result 3.11-3b, in a safety impact. and 3.11-3c Impact 3.11 A. During LTS-M LTS-M 3-76 to 3- No No No Mitigation construction activities 78 Measure impacts associated 3.11-4 with the vandalism of equipment at staging and storage areas could occur. Impact 3.11-5: LTS-M LTS-M 3-76 to 3- No No No Mitigation Improper disposal of 78 Measures construction refuse 3.11-5a and would impact public 3.11-5b services. Impact 3.11-6: Project LTS-M LTS-M 3-76 to 3- No No No Mitigation activities could result 78 Measures in impacts associated 3.11-6a, with disruptions to 3.11-6b, axis tin utilities. and 3.11-6c Impact 3.11-7: LTS-M LTS-M 3-76 to 3- No No No Mitigation Projects could affect 78 Measure the compatibility of 3.11-7 existing and future o'ects. August 2016 2-18 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL Location Substantial New of where changosin Substantial information of Prior Project's the project changesinthe substantial mitigation PEIR Impact 2007 Adden involving circumstances importance measures CIECIA Appendix G Threshold Statement PEIR dum Impa a new underwhich that would from 2007 Finding Finding were addressed significant or the project is result in new PEIR that in 2007 substantially being impacts, address PEIR more sever undertaken? mitigation,or impact impacts? alternatives? 15. Recreation Would the Project. XV.a Would the project increase the use N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A of existing neighborhood and B:3-17 regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? XV.b Does the project include N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A recreational facilities or require the B:3-17 construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Woul the Project. XVI.a• Conflict with an applicable plan, Impact 3.12-1:Traffic LTS-M LTS-M 3-85 to 3- No No No,-the Mitigation ordinance or policy establishing impacts will occur 87 roadway Measures measures of effectiveness for the within city streets and alignment table 3.12-1a, performance of the circulation would impact traffic. has been 3.12-1b, system,taking into account all revised 3.12-1c, modes of transportation including (included as 3.12-1d, mass transit and non-motorized Appendix G), 3.12-le, travel and relevant components of however none 3.12-1f, the circulation system, including but of the criteria 3.12-1g, not limited to intersections,streets, in§15162 are 3.12-1h, highways and freeways,pedestrian met.A 3.12-11,and and bicycle paths,and mass summary of 3.12-1j transit? the revisions is provided below. August 2016 2-19 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL substantial CIECIA Appendix G Threshold PEIR Impact importance Statement that would result in new REM== impacts, EMEEGM� - mitigation,or lmlm�m alternatives? XVI.b Conflict with an applicable Impact 3.12-2: SU-M SU-M 31107 No No No pMeasures congestion management program, Construction of including, but not limited to level of collection system . - a, service standards and travel improvement projects 3.12-21b, demand measures,or other would include lane 3.12-2c, standards established by the closures and limited 3.12-2d, county congestion management road closures that 3.12-2e, agency for designated roads or would worsen LOS and 3.12-2f highways? along local roadways XVI.c Result in a change in air tragic N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A patterns,including either an B:3-17 increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? XVI.d Substantially increase hazards due N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A to a design feature(e.g.,sharp B:3-18 curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? XVI.e Result in inadequate emergency See Impact 3.12-1 LTS-M LTS-M 3-86 and No No No Mitigation access? and Impact 3.12-2 3-76 Measures 3.12-1g, 3.11-1,and 3.11-2 XVI.f Result in inadequate parking N/A LTS LTS Appendix No No No N/A ca aci v B:3-18 XVI.g Conflict with adopted policies, N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A plans,or programs supporting B:3-18 alternative transportation? August 2016 2-20 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL Location Substantial New of where changosin Substantial information of Prior Project's the project changesinthe substantial mitigation PEIR Impact 2007 Adden involving circumstances importance measures CIECIA Appendix G Threshold Statement PEIR dum Impa a new underwhich that would from 2007 Finding Finding were addressed significant or the project is result in new PEIR that in 2007 substantially being impacts, address PEIR more sever undertaken? mitigation,or impact impacts? alternatives? 17. Utilities and Service Systems Would the Project. XVll.a Exceed wastewater treatment N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A requirements of the applicable B:3-18 Regional Water Quality Control Board? XVll.b Require or result in the construction N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A of new water or wastewater B:3-19 treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? XVll.c Require or result in the construction N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A of new storm water drainage B:3-19 facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? XVll.d Have sufficient water supplies N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A available to serve the project from B:3-19 existing entitlements and resources,or are new or expanded entitlements needed? XVll.e Result in a determination by the N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A wastewater treatment provider B:3-19 which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the rovider's existing commitments? XVll.f I Be served by a landfill with N/A LTS LTS Appendix No No No N/A suf 10 ant permitted capacity to B:3-19 August 2016 2-21 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL suit in new substantial importance CIECIA Appendix G Threshold PEIR Impact that would Statement REM== impacts, EMEEGMM mitigation,or accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? XVll.g Comply with federal,state,and N/A NI NI Appendix No No No N/A local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? 18 Mandatory Findings of Significance Would the Project: XVlll.a Does the project have the potential Potential to degrade SU SU Appendix No No No Ves to degrade the quality of the quality of B:3-20 environment, substantially reduce environment, habitat, the habitat of a fish or wildlife cause wildlife/fish species,cause a fish or wildlife population drop, population to drop below self- threaten plant/animal sustaining levels,threaten to community,adversely eliminate a plant or animal affect range of community,reduce the number or threatened or restrict the range of a rare or endangered species, endangered plant or animal or eliminate important eliminate important examples of the examples of major major periods of California history periods of history or orprehistory? prehistory? XVlll.b Does the project have impacts that Impacts that are SU SU Appendix No No No Yes are individually limited,but individually limited but B:3-20 cumulatively considerable? cumulatively ("Cumulatively considerable' considerable? means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects,and the effects of probable future projects)? August 2016 2-22 1136054.1 Location Substantial New of where changes in Substantial information of Prior Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan FOR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL Project's the project changes in the substantial mitigation 2007 involving circumstances importance measures CEGA AppendixG Thresholtl PEIR Impact pEIR Atldentlum Impacljs) new underwhich that would from 2007 Statement Finding Finding were significant or the project is result in new PEIR that atldressetl substantially being impacts, adtlress in 2007 more sever undertaken? mitigation,or impact PEIR impacts? alternatives? Does the project Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL 2.1.1 Aesthetics There are no scenic vistas or state scenic highways in the project area. Construction activities will be temporary and will take place in developed areas. These activities will not negatively affect the existing visual character or quality of the site or its surroundings permanently. The District 6 project will also not create any new permanent source of light or glaze because the finished project will be primarily underground, and does not include lighting or strongly reflective surfaces. Some existing lighting may be relocated to accommodate the project, but will be moved new its current location; therefore such action will not result in a new source of light. Temporary construction lighting may be necessary,but any such lighting will be directed away from residences in compliance with the applicable municipal codes. Therefore,the level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. 2.1.2 Agriculture and Forestry There is no existing farmland or forests/timberland in the project area,therefore the District 6 project will not affect farmland or forestry resources. Due to changes to the CEQA Guidelines since adoption of the 2007 PEIR, additional discussion is included here. Additional Aarlculture and Forestry Analysis Since the adoption of the 2007 PEIR, the CEQA Guidelines have been updated to include the following question related to potential impacts to agriculture and forestry resources: Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for,or cause rezoning of,forest land,timberland,or timberland-zoned Timberland Production? The District 6 Project is not located within an area zoned for forest or timberland(City of Newport Beach, 2015;Costa Mesa, 2015).As such, it would not conflict with existing zoning,nor would it cause rezoning of, forest or timberland. Therefore, there would be no impact from the District 6 Project on forests or timberland. 2.1.3 Air Quality The construction activities included in the revised District 6 Project me typical construction activities that were described in the 2007 PEIR. Potential air quality impacts we a result of these construction activities, rather than a long-term impacts from operation of the rehabilitated sewer trunk line. The 2007 PEIR evaluated all projects in a shorter timeframe than the projects are actually being implemented.For example, the District 6 project was initially scheduled to be implemented between 2008 and 2010. The District 6 project is now scheduled to be implemented in 2016 and 2017. The extended timeline for the projects included in the 2007 PEIR have likely reduced the cumulative air quality impacts because fewer project components would be under construction at the same time,reducing the sources of construction emissions at a given time. Project-level analysis was conducted for the District 6 Project for air quality and greenhouse gases(GHGs), and included as Appendix B. Results from the air quality portion of this analysis are summarized immediately following this table,while the results from the GHG analysis have been summarized following Table 2-4. Additional Air Quality Analysis An air quality analysis was completed for this Addendum to consider changes to the air basin,and updated project information including refined construction methodology and final repair and rehabilitation designs. This new Air Quality analysis has been included as Appendix B and is summarized here.As described in the OCSD Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR,the project is located in the South Coast Air Basin, which is in attainment for SO2, N2O, PMIQ, and lead, in non-attainment for 03 and PM2.5, and in August 2016 2-24 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PER District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL maintenance for CO. Emissions associated with the District 6 project were modeled using California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2013.2.2 to determine the daily maximum and annual average for criteria pollutant emissions and total annual GHG emissions. Modeling results were then compared to applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)standards to determine the potential for significant air quality impacts. As shown in Table 2-2, there were no exceedances for criteria pollutants anticipated during construction of the District 6 project.No long-term operational impacts are anticipated for this project because once construction is complete, maintenance of the sewer pipeline will be consistent with current maintenance of the existing pipeline.No additional emissions are anticipated above current conditions as related to operation and maintenance. Table 2-2: Construction Emissions of Criteria Pollutants Peak Daily Criteria Pollutants, lb/clay ROG CO NOX SOX PM10 PM2.5 Regional Impact Evaluation Total Daily Emissions 6.53 41.28 58.29 0.06 15.28 9.45 Regional Thresholds 75 550 100 150 150 55 Exceed Regional Thresholds(Yes/No)? No No No No No No Localized Impact Evaluation Total Daily Offsite Emissions 0 0 0 0 0.9 0.047 Localized Significance Thresholds - 647 92 - 4 3 Exceed Localized Significance Thresholds(Yes/No)? No No No No No No Each of the CEQA Guidelines for Air Quality were reevaluated following modeling of the District 6 project, and results compared to the findings presented in the PEIR.A summary of this analysis is presented here: Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? SCAQMD's Air Quality Management Plan(AQMP)is the applicable air quality plan within the Study Area for the District 6 Project.The bulk of the emissions associated with the District 6 Project would result from construction activities,and as shown in Table 2-2,above,construction emissions from the District 6 Project would not exceed applicable air quality thresholds. The Region currently exceeds air quality standards for ozone(03)and PM2.5,both of whose primary sources are vehicle and other mobile emissions. Operation of the District 6 Project would not result in a substantial increase in vehicle or mobile emissions from existing conditions, because the operation and maintenance of the District 6 Project would be similar in nature, extent, and frequency as the current operation and maintenance of the existing alignment. The District 6 Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. Potential air quality impacts are less severe than those in the 2007 PEIR. Would the project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? As shown in Table 2-2,above,construction of the District 6 Project is not anticipated to result in emissions exceeding applicable air quality standards. The Region is in non-attainment for ozone and PM2.5, which are primarily a result of vehicle and mobile sources.Operation of the District 6 Project would not result in a substantial increase in vehicle or mobile emissions from existing conditions,because the operation and maintenance of the District 6 Project would be similar in nature, extent, and frequency as the current operation and maintenance of the existing alignment. The Project, therefore, would not significantly August 2016 2-25 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PER District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL contribute to overall ozone and PM2.5 emissions. No new impacts associated with the violation of air quality standards would occur. Due to the Region's non-attainment for ozone and PM2.5, applicable air quality mitigation measures included in the PEIR shall be employed to minimize particulate emissions during the District 6 Project(refer to Section 1.4.2 of this Addendum).These include Mitigation Measures 3.2-la, 3.2-lb, and 3.2-2. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard(including releasing emissions,which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? The South Coast region is in non-attainment for ozone and PM2.5. Based on the air quality analysis in Appendix B, potential emissions from truck traffic associated with construction of this project would represent insignificant sources of pollutants contributing to the overall PM2.5 emissions. The District 6 Project would not generate a cumulatively considerable net increase of ozone or PM2.5, the two criteria pollutants for which the region is in non-attainment. Therefore, the District 6 Project would not have significant cumulative air quality impacts for criteria pollutants for which the region is in non-attainment. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Sensitive receptors in the Study Area include a library, a park,three places of worship, a hospital, senior living community, and a school. As shown in Table 2-2, the temporary increase in criteria air pollutant emissions during construction would not exceed SCAQMD's applicable air quality standards. The construction period will last approximately eight months, after which construction-related emissions will cease. Operation of the District 6 Project would result in minimal emissions consistent with the existing operation of the line, and are not anticipated to result in long-teen operational impacts that conflict with SCAQMD air quality standards. Therefore, the District 6 Project would not have a significant impact to sensitive receptors during construction or operation. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. Would the project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? The District 6 Project would be expected to create some objectionable odors as a result of modification of the existing sewer lines. Currently,OCSD investigates and trucks all odor complaints,performing cleaning and/or repairs as appropriate, and would continue this practice. As part of its operational activity, OCSD injects sodium hydroxide, hydrogen peroxide, ferrous chloride, and magnesium hydroxide at various locations in the collection system to control odor. Construction contractors are required to follow a site- specific odor control plan to minimize odors during rehabilitation activities.As explained in the 2007 PER odor control could include monitoring, ventilating, chemical application, material containment limiting atmospheric exposure, and activity staging to minimize odor impacts. Therefore, impacts associated with the creation of objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people would be considered less than significant. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. 2.1.4 Biological Resources The District 6 project is unlikely to cause any impacts to biological resources because of its location in a developed area, placement within the roadway right-of-way, and the nature of the project. Existing vegetation along the roadway and at manholes where new excavation,pavers, and vehicle pullouts would be constructed is primarily non-native ice plant. Activities in these areas will therefore not impact species movement or nursery sites, which are unlikely to be dependent on this non-native monocultare species because it provides minimal habitat benefits.As described below,a site visit was conducted to confirm the August2016 2-26 113054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL location of project activities and verify that dominant vegetation was non-native iceplant in areas where vegetation would be disturbed. While it is unlikely that special status biological resources are found in the project area due to location and lack of significant amounts of open space, the most recent observation and survey of the site found one species of interest: Aphanisma blitoides. However, this sighting was from 1934. In compliance with Mitigation Measure 3.3-1, a site visit was conducted to survey natural habitat within the footprint of proposed project activities. As described below, the only natural habitat near the alignment is a drainage Swale adjacent to Newport Blvd.between MH-155 and MH-165.This Swale would not be impacted by the District 6 Project because the pipeline rehabilitation and upgrades are designed specifically to avoid impacts to this swale.No other portions of Mitigation Measure 3.3-1 were triggered. The District 6 Project is not located new aquatic fisheries,but may result in some runoff entering the storm drain during construction,which may enter a fishery through the storm system. Mitigation Measure 3.3-2 will implement best management practices to avoid contaminant runoff from construction practices.There are no jurisdictional areas in the project area. Nonetheless,Mitigation Measure 3.3-2 will be implemented to avoid indirect impacts to jurisdictional areas from contaminant runoff. Realignment of the pipeline through MH-155 to MH-A will move the pipeline to the area between the existing guardrail along Newport Boulevard and the slope of the swale,with the old alignment abandoned in place.Abandoning the pipeline in place will avoid impacts to wetland or riparian habitat along the swale.The project will not conflict with local policies or ordinances, and is located outside the bounds of the Orange Coastal/Central Natural Community Conservation Plan, thereby avoiding any impacts to these policies and plans. Therefore, the level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. Additional Bioloplcal Resources Analysis As required under Mitigation Measure 3.3-1, a site walk was conducted on May 1, 2015 along the final pipeline alignment to evaluate natural habitat within the footprint of the proposed construction activities. Limited vegetation was identified within the construction footprint of the new alignment. As shown in the photos in Appendix C (Figures 1-17), vegetation along the alignment is primarily non-native iceplant (carpobrotus edulis). The site visit confirmed that staging areas,pipeline trenches,and pits would also be located in non-native iceplant-dominated areas. For the District 6 Project, the only native habitat area is located along the swale between MH-155 and MH-165 (see Appendix C, Figures 9-10). Construction of the new alignment would occur between the existing guardrail(which would be removed and replaced)and the slope of the swale itself. As shown in the photos in Appendix C, this area contains limited native grasses. During construction, protective measures would be implemented for embankment protection, limiting construction impacts on the Swale.The area would be restored upon completion of construction. To simplify maintenance activities, the Project was designed to abandon MH-160 in place. Abandoning MH-I60 also avoids impacts to the natural habitat around the swale. As shown in Appendix C(Figure 8), the access point from Old Newport Boulevard is primarily non-native vegetation. The site visit confirmed that there are existing trails from Old Newport Boulevard to MH-160,which could be used by construction crews during abandonment of MH-160,and therefore no substantial disturbance to vegetation would occur during abandonment of this manhole. Proposed construction and maintenance activities would not contribute to substantial increases in ambient noise due to existing noise from Newport Boulevard and surrounding developed areas.The area surrounding MH-170 and ABAN-MH,which is not located within landscape or roadway ROWS, would be disturbed by the District 6 Project(see Appendix C, Figure 11). While this area is not as dominated by iceplant as the eastern side of Newport Boulevard, it is primarily non-native habitat,comprising iceplant,low-lying shrubs,and palm trees. However,no native or sensitive vegetation would be impacted by construction activities at MH-170 and ABAN-MH. Therefore, the level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. August 2016 2-27 113W54.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL All areas disturbed by the District 6 Project would be revegetated in accordance with the Landscape Plan, also provided in Appendix C. 2.1.5 Cultural Resources It is unlikely that there are any cultural resources within the project area that will be encountered or impacted by the project because project activities consist of cleaning or replacing existing pipelines,and construction of new pipelines will occur within existing roadways or in previously disturbed areas.However,the project lies within archaeologically and historically significant areas, so there is a possibility that there could be impacts to cultural resources. Because of the higher chance of encountering cultural resources through excavation associated with the project,Mitigation Measures 3.4-1 through 3.4-2c will be implemented. To comply with Mitigation Measure 3.4-1, a project-level Cultural Resources Assessment(see Appendix D) was conducted in September 2014,the results of which are discussed below. The project is located within a developed area, and will be constructed within and immediately adjacent to the roadway and existing pipelines,so there we no historical resources to encounter.Therefore,the level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. Additional Cultural Resources Analysis To implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-1, a Cultural Resources Assessment was developed for the District 6 Project,and is summarized here.The complete report has been included as Appendix D.The Study Area is located in an area that has been occupied by humans for thousands of years. At the time the Spanish settled in the Study Area,it was occupied by the Gabrielino people,with a neighboring group,the Juaneiio, in central Orange County. A cultural resources records search and literature review at the South Central Coastal Information Center(SCCIC)was conducted to determine if the Study Area has been subject to a cultural resources survey and if any cultural resources had been recorded within a one-mile radius of the project. In addition, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) was notified about the project, and a Sacred Lands Inventory was conducted to determine if any cultural resources were located within the Study Area. Nine tribes were identified as affiliated with the area, and were contacted for additional information on the history and prehistory of the area. Finally,a vehicular survey was conducted along the pipeline alignment. Records indicated the presence of seven cultural resources on or within one-half mile of the project alignment, none of which were within the Area of Potential Effects (APE). Four of these sites were shell middens,one was a church,one an office building,and one was a yacht.These resources are listed in Table 2-3.Native American contacts indicated that there was potential for cultural resources because the project was located"in and around a sensitive area where traditional territories of the Gabrieleno still exist'.While the site visit indicated that there were no historical resources that would be impacted by the District 6 Project,the presence of recorded prehistoric archaeological sites near the alignment suggests the potential for other,unrecorded,prehistoric resources within the pipeline alignment.Overall,the alignment was found to be moderately to highly sensitive for cultural resources(see Figure 2-1). August 2016 2-28 113054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PER District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL Table 23: Cultural Resources On or Within One-Half Mile of the Project Alignment DescriptionResources Within Site Number Recorder(year) 30-000297 Ahlering(1971) Shell Midden No 30-000357 T. Elliott(1973) Shell Midden No 30-000059 Nelson(1912) Shell Midden No 30-000060 Nelson(1912) Shell Midden No 30-177134 Supemowicz(2011) Office Building No 30-179477 Unknown(2011) Wild Goose(yacht) No 132140 Unknown(2002) Our Lady Mount Carmel (church) No APE=Area of Potential Effects Due to the cultural resources sensitivity of the alignment, several additional mitigation measures were identified in the Cultural Resources Assessment. Proposed MM-1 (see page 10 of Cultural Resources Assessment in Appendix D) generally reinforces the actions required under (and me not considerably different from) the PEER Mitigation Measures; additional text has been added to Mitigation Measure 3.4- 2a to clarify archeological and Native American monitoring during construction. Subsequent evaluation found that the existing District 6 Trunk sewer pipeline was determined not to meet the criteria necessary to be identified as a historical resources as defined by 14 CCR §4850, PRC §21084.1, 14 CCR §15064.5(3) of CEQA(see page 8 of July 11, 2015 letter in Appendix D); therefore, proposed MM-2 (see page 11 of Cultural Resources Assessment in Appendix D) was determined to be not applicable to the Proposed Project.Revised Mitigation Measure 3.4-2a is provided below,with additions shown in underline. Revised Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure Mitigation Measure 3.4-2a: Subsurface construction has the potential for exposing significant subsurface cultural resources. Due to the likelihood of encountering cultural resources, the Sanitation District will implement the following prior to commencement of construction activities: • Prior to the issuance of the first aradina permit and/or action that would permit Project site disturbance.the Contractor shall provide written evidence to the Sanitation District that the Contractor has retained a aualified Archaeologist to observe creche activities and to salvage and catalogue archaeological resources,as necessary.The Archaeologist shall be present at the ore-arede conference:shall establish Procedures for archaeological resource surveillance: and shall establish, in cooperation with the Contractor,procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling,identification,and evaluation of the artifacts, as appropriate. If the archaeological resources are found to be significant(as determined by the Arohaeolonist). the Archaeologist shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the applicable City and Contractor, for exploration and/or salvage. These actions, as well as final mitigation and disposition of the resources, shall be subject to the approval of the applicable Plannina Director.Based on their interest and concern about the discovery of cultural resources and human remains during Project aradina. a Native American Monitor shall be retained to observe some or all aradina activities.Nothing in this mitigation measure precludes the retention of a sinale cross-trained observer who is qualified to monitor for both archaeological and paleontological resources. • Prior to construction,contractors,and Sanitation District staff will receive an archaeological orientation from a professional archaeologist regarding the types of resources that could be uncovered during construction activities and the identification of these resources. The orientation also will cover procedures to follow in the case of any archaeological discovery. August2016 2-29 1136054.1 t a .� . i + C . _ P"% Am i 14, Sensitivity Map Exhibit 2 PIO �. � {�!^�• _ l: q� � 3 r1I �y�}�( � .mil 1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PER District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL 2.1.6 Geology and Soils The District 6 Project is located in a region susceptible to seismicity and groundshaking,and would require design features to meet earthquake standards,which is expected for any construction in Southem California. Despite the project's location in an earthquake-prone area, only a portion of the project lies within a liquefaction area(City of Newport Beach, 2006). Mitigation Measure 3.5-2 will ensure that any potential impacts related to liquefaction will be mitigated to less than significant. A geotechnical study was completed for the District 6 Project, and included as Appendix E to this Addendum. A brief summary of the study's findings are provided below. The 2007 PEIR found that geological impacts would be less than significant due to design standards and engineering and construction practices. However, it found that pipelines located in peat bogs could be damaged from collapse of peat mat or fires (refer to page 3-42 of the PEIR). No part of the District 6 Project lies over peat(CGS, 2010; California Division of Mines and Geology, 1976), so there is no impact of the District 6 project on facilities placed in soils susceptible to settlement. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. New infrastructure would be constructed in an area that has a potential landslide risk as part of the District 6 Project; however this would not be a new exposure to landslides because it is in an area that has been previously developed. All design work will be in compliance with laws,regulations, and building codes, while standard construction practices will control soil erosion and loss of topsoil.The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. As this is a sewer trunk rehabilitation project,there are no septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems that are part of the District 6 project,therefore there will be no impacts related to soils supporting the use of such systems. Additional Geology and Soils Analysis As required under Mitigation Measure 3.5-2, applicable to the District 6 Project(see Section 1.4.2), soil surveys were completed during project design to determine the liquefaction potential along the pipeline alignment.A gemechnical report completed for the District 6 Project has been included as Appendix E to this Addendum. The report made the following findings: • Fault Ruptures: The Study Area is within a seismically active area,but does not cross known active or potentially active faults.The potential for fault-related ground rupture to impact the Project Area is low to very-low,although there is potential for ground shaking to occur as a result of local or regional fault-based earthquakes.Fault rupture impacts associated with the District 6 Project would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.5-1,which requires compliance with building codes. • Strong Groundshaking: Peak ground acceleration(PGA)for an event with a 10 percent probability of exceedance in a 50-year exposure period is 0,35g.The mean moment magnitude is 6.64 at a distance of 18.1 km from the Study Area,and the shear wave velocity of the alluvium was assumed to be 270 meters per second.Groundshaking impacts associated with the District 6 Project would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.5-1,which requires compliance with building codes. • Liquefaction:Potential was found for liquefaction within the southern portion of the Project Area, and potential for liquefaction may exist at depth greater than the soil tests conducted for the report.Liquefaction impacts associated with the District 6 Project would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.5-2,which requires use of consolidated,engineered backfill in pipeline construction. August 2016 2-31 113054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PER District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL • Soil Instability-Settlement: Seismic settlement within the Project Area would likely be a result of liquefaction-related settlement and densifrcation of dry cohesionless soils from earthquake shaking.Any potential settlement is estimated to be less than one inch. Settlement impacts associated with the District 6 Project would be less than significant. • Soil Instability—Lateral Spreading:At current groundwater levels,the risk of lateral spreading is low. This risk increases if groundwater levels rise in the future to within about 10 feet of the ground surface.Lateral spreading impacts associated with the District 6 Project would be less than significant • Flooding and Tsunami:Flooding potential for the Project Area is low,and it lies outside the mapped tsunami inundation area. Therefore potential flooding and tsunami hazards can be considered less than significant. Design of the District 6 Project accounted for these findings,and appropriate design choices were made to minimize the geologic and soil hazards for the District 6 Project. Therefore,the level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. 2.1.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions The requirement to analyze greenhouse gas(GHG)emissions was added to CEQA after the completion of the 2007 PEIR.A GHG analysis is not required for the project(Concerned Dublin Citizens v. City of Dublin (2013) 214 CalApp.4'" 1301, 1320). Nonetheless, a project-level air quality analysis was completed for the District 6 Project,which included a GHG analysis.The results of this analysis are automatized below, and the complete air quality analysis included as Appendix B of this Addendum. Additional Greenhouse Gas Analysis In 2010(after the completion of the 2007 PEIR),the requirement to analyze greenhouse gas(GHG)impacts was added to the CEQA Guidelines. GHGs cause global climate change through their ability to effectively tap heat within the Earth's atmosphere. GHGs include carbon dioxide(CO2),methane(CH4)and nitrous oxide (N2O). CO2 is the most common GHG, and GHG emissions are generally reported in CO2- equivalents(CO2e).Emissions of GHGs can occur naturally(e.g.,forest fires,decomposition)or as a result of human activities(e.g.,consumption of fossil fuels for energy generation and transportation,heating,and cooking). A comprehensive,project-level analysis of potential GHG emissions and impacts resulting from the District 6 Project was included in the Air Quality and Climate Change Technical Memorandum, included as Appendix B to this Addendum,and results have been summarized here. There are federal, State, and regional/local GHG-related regulations applicable to the District 6 Project. These regulations include the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) under the U.S. EPA; Assembly Bill 1493, Executive Order 5-3-05,Assembly Bill 32,Executive Order 5-1-07 and Senate Bill 97 under the California Air Resources Board(CARB);and relevant regulations of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).A summary of the relevant portions of these regulations is provided in Air Quality and Climate Change Technical Memorandum(Appendix B). GHG emissions from the District 6 Project are anticipated to be a result of the operation of construction equipment and on-and off-road vehicle trips. Construction equipment emissions were calculated using horsepower-based composite emissions factors with built-in load factors obtained from the SCAQMD. These emissions factors represent fleet-wide average emission factors within the South Coast Air Basin in 2014.On-road vehicle trip emissions were calculated using CARB's On-Road EMFAC2011 mobile source emissions factors,obtained from the EMFAC2011 model. Results from the modeling and quantification of GHG emissions anticipated from the District 6 Project were compared against interim significance thresholds established by SCAQMD and CARB. The interim August 2016 2-32 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL SCAQMD threshold is 10,000 metric tons of CO2e per year (MTCO2e/yr) for industrial projects (construction impacts amortized over a 30-year period, plus operational impacts). CARB's proposed interim threshold, which has not yet been adopted, is 7,000 MTCO2e/yr for non-transportation GHG emissions.Because the District 6 Project's GHG emissions will almost entirely result from transportation, the SCAQMD thresholds were used to determine the significance of potential GHG impacts from the District 6 Project.As shown in Table 2-4,construction of the District 6 Project is anticipated to create 4.58 MTCO2e/year,well below the SCAQMD interim threshold.These results were used to determine that there would be no GHG impacts from the District 6 Project, as described below. As stated in the air quality discussion above,operation and maintenance activities for this project are anticipated to be consistent with current operation and maintenance of the existing sewer pipeline. Therefore, long-term GHG emissions associated with operation and maintenance activities are not anticipated to increase over current conditions. Table 2.4: Project GHG Emissions and SCAQMD Threshold Source • - Total Project CO2e Emissions During Construction (MTCO2e/Project) 137.27 Emissions Construction GHG Emissions,Amortized over 30 years(MTCO2e/year) 4.58 SCAQMD Interim GHG Threshold for Industrial Projects(MTCO2e/yr) 10,000 Exceed the Threshold (Yes/No)? NO Would the project generate GHG emissions,either directly or indirectly,that may have a significant impact on the environment? Implementation of the Project would generate greenhouse gases through the construction and routine maintenance of the Project. GHG emissions from the Project would specifically arise from the temporary direct sources, such as motor vehicles and construction related diesel equipment Emissions from these sources were estimated using the CaIEEMod model based on default emission factors and land use consumption and generation rates. As shown in Table 24, construction of the District 6 Project would generate 137.27 MTCO2e over the project life,with amortized construction emissions of 4.58 MTCO2e/yr. Operation and maintenance of the District 6 Project is not anticipated to produce substantial GHG emissions beyond the current emissions associated with operation and maintenance of the pipeline, as the project would be operated and maintained in a manner similar to current conditions. The air quality mitigation measures in the 2007 PEIR are designed to reduce fugitive dust pollutants, and would not reduce GHG emissions. As such, the GHG emissions included in Table 2-4 are the anticipated GHG emissions of the District 6 Project with no mitigation measures incorporated. Construction and operation emissions would be below the SCAQMD thresholds of 10,000 MTCO2e, and GHG emissions impacts would be less than significant.No mitigation is required. Would the project conflict with any applicable plan,policy,or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs? At the state level,AB 32 established the goal of reducing GHG emissions in California to 1990 levels by 2020.The interim SCAQMD screening-level thresholds are designed such that a 90 percent capture rate is achieved, meaning that 90 percent of all development projects would need to incorporate some form of emission reductions in order to achieve the threshold. These rates were established by SCAQMD to be compliant with the AB 32 threshold of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. The Project's GHG emissions would be below the SCAQMD's screening-level thresholds, and would therefore not conflict with AB 32. Because the Project is compliant with the SCAQMD threshold, and would comply with all regulatory requirements related to GHG emissions, the Project would not conflict August 2016 2-33 113054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PER District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL with plans, policies or regulations adopted to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. The impact of the Project would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. 2.1.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hazardous materials are used for corrosion and odor control. The 2007 PEIR identified four hazardous materials that would be used during project construction (refer to page 3-45 of the PEIR): hydrogen peroxide,magnesium hydroxide,ferrous chloride,and sodium hydroxide.For the District 6 project,OCSD intends to use magnesium hydroxide or ferrous chloride to perform odor control by dosing the trunk sewer prior to construction. In the event that an air scrubber is used instead of dosing for odor control,hydrogen peroxide or sodium hydroxide may be used. The pipeline analysis conducted as part of the design for the District 6 project identified cracks,corrosion,and encrustation at joints in the pipeline,indicating a risk of leaks and therefore soil contamination in the project area. Mitigation Measure 3.6-6 will be implemented to provide for safe handling of potentially contaminated soils. Although road closures are not anticipated as part of the District 6 project, construction will occur along a major artery(Newport Blvd.), and near a hospital, increasing the potential to impair implementation of an emergency response or evacuation plan. Mitigation Measures 3.11-1 and 3.11-2, discussed under Traffic will address potential impacts to implementation of emergency response or evacuation plans. Therefore, the level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. The 2007 PEIR identified Impact 3.6-5 as less-than-significant with mitigation. The District 6 project is located within the Newport Blvd.right-of-way,which has been previously excavated for prior installation of pipelines and other utilities. Therefore, it is not expected that oil wells will be encountered during the District 6 project,and Impact 3.6-5 is not applicable. Although the project is not located within a quarter-mile of an existing or proposed school, and therefore will have no impact related to emitting hazardous emissions or handling hazardous materials substances of waste within a quarter-mile of a school,hazardous emissions and handling of hazardous materials or waste will be addressed through Mitigation Measures 3.6-1 through 3.6-6. The project is also not within a hazardous materials site, per the California Department of Toxic Substances Control's EnviroStar Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List and the Cortese List. The Upper Reach of the project is outside of the John Wayne Airport planning area(Orange County Airport Land Use Commission, 2008). There are no other airstrips within the vicinity of the project.Additionally, the project is not near wildlands.Impacts to these areas are therefore not applicable to the District 6 Project. Additional Hazardous Materials Analysis In compliance with Mitigation Measure 3.6-6, a limited regulatory agency search was performed for the Study Area.The records search included the SWRCB GeoTmcker database and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control(DTSC)EnviroStor database.These lists are a compilation of information on potential and confirmed hazardous wastes and substances sites in California. Results from the records search are provided in Appendix F to this Addendum. Within the project area and immediately adjacent to the District 6 Sewer Trunk were four closed sites: Hughes Aircraft Co.—Solid Prod,Newport Autoworks,City of Newport Beach Corporate Yard,and Ford's Automotive. Each of these sites were leaking underground storage tanks,but cleanup has been completed. Sites of potential concern near, but not within or immediately adjacent to the pipeline include: Newport Health Care Facility(Active—remediation)on Dana Rd.,Raytheon Micro Electronics(Closed)on Superior Ave.,Ralph Irwin Site(Closed)on Old Newport Blvd., Smith and Sons(Closed)and Hartman Enterprises (Inactive—needs evaluation)on Ohms Way,Jim Lee Plumbing(Closed)on Industrial Way,Hoag Memorial Hospital(Inactive—needs evaluation)on Newport Blvd. August2016 2-34 113W54.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL All leaking underground storage tanks within or near the project have been closed, indicating cleanup has been completed.All Sites reported near the project are listed in Appendix A,along with maps showing sites and the approximate location of the District 6 Sewer Trunk.No active sites of concern are anticipated to be encountered during project construction.Therefore,the level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. 2.1.9 Hydrology and Water Quality Construction activities inherently include risk of stormwater contamination due to erosion/sedimentation during grading and excavation. In accordance with Mitigation Measure 3.7-1 of the PEIR, projects with surface disturbances of 1 acre or more require a NPDES General Permit for Discharges of Stone Water Associated with Construction Activities and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP).The total disturbed area of the District 6 project would exceed 1 acre in size; a SWPPP will be developed and implemented, and all required permits acquired. The SWPPP would include erosion and sedimentation control best management practices (BMPs), along with BMPs to prevent or minimize pollution from the construction site into surface waters. Therefore, the level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. The 2007 PEIR found potential impacts to biological resources for project activities within jurisdictional areas.These impacts would require Mitigation Measure 3.7-2.However,the District 6 project is not within waters of the U.S.,nor within jurisdictional areas,therefore this potential impact and its mitigation measure is not applicable to the project. Any excavation activities may encounter groundwater, thereby requiring dewatering, and subsequently leading to potential impacts to surface water quality.Although dewatering will be discharged to the sanitary sewer system under this project, to be conservative, and for consistency with the 2007 PEIR, Mitigation Measure 3.7-3 will be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant.This measure is included as a contingency in the unanticipated event that dewatered flows cannot be discharged to the sewer. Though the project may encounter groundwater during excavation activities, it will not deplete groundwater resources,and impacts to groundwater supply volumes or the aquifer volume are not applicable. Impacts to drainage patterns that would result in erosion, siltation, or flooding are also not applicable because the project will not alter the overall drainage patterns of the area,and all roadway drainages within Newport Blvd.will be restored to pre-construction conditions following installation of the pipeline.Further, the project will not create or contribute to runoff water that exceeds the capacity of the drainage system because project facilities would primarily exist underground within current impervious areas when completed. The project will not create additional impervious surfaces from current conditions that would lead to additional runoff. Nor will it contribute a substantial additional source of polluted runoff because project activities will not contribute to runoff water,and dewatering will be discharged to the sanitary sewer for treatment. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. The project is not within the 100-year flood hazard area (City of Newport Beach, 2008), therefore no structures or housing will be placed within the flood hazard zone.Further,the project will not redirect flows within the I00-year flood zone,No dams or levees will be impacted by the project,therefore there will be no dam or levee failure impacts. Finally, the 2007 PEIR found that the project will not have any impacts related to seiche,tsunami,or mudflow,and no changes made to the project since development of the 2007 PEIR would lead to increased potential for impacts related to seiche,tsunami,or mudflow. 2.1.10 Land Use and Planning The 2007 PEIR has identified sensitive receptors near the project area, including a hospital. Mitigation Measures 3.8-1 through 3.8-3 are required to address the needs of these receptors during temporary impacts of construction. Although few businesses will be affected by the District 6 project because of its location August 2016 2-35 113054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PER District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL along Newport Blvd.,Mitigation Measure 3.84 is required to ensure that there will be no disruptions from construction activities. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEER. The project is outside the bounds of Orange Coastal/Central Natural Community Conservation Plan and will not conflict with an existing habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. The District 6 project rehabilitates an existing sewer trunk,which is primarily underground,therefore the project will not physically divide an established community. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. 2.1.11 Mineral Resources The District 6 project will occur entirely on previously developed land and therefore would have no impact on mineral resources.The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. 2.1.12 Noise The 2007 PEIR indicates that as long as construction occurs only during the time limits set by the City of Newport Beach(7:00 am— 6:30 pm) and the City of Costa Mesa (7:00 am— 11:00 pm) during the week, the project will be in compliance with noise standards. Section 1.4.1 lists this requirement as an environmental commitment from the 2007 PEIR that applies to the District 6 project.Construction activities for the District 6 Project have not changed such that substantial increases in potential noise levels from those evaluated for the 2007 PEIR would occur. In addition,Mitigation Measure 3.9-1 will ensure that all noise impacts are reduced to less than significant, including impacts to ambient noise levels, and noise levels affecting people residing or working in project areas that we also within an airport planning area(in this case the John Wayne Airport). Implementation of this mitigation measure could include temporary noise reduction measures(e.g.,sound blankets or sound walls),placement of stationary equipment in areas where noise would naturally be buffered (e.g., inside jacking pits), limiting times of day of use of particularly disturbing activities(e.g.,pile driving), and noise monitoring at the closest sensitive receptors. There me no noise impacts to people residing or working in the project area that is within the vicinity of a private airstrip because there is no private airstrip new the project area; therefore this impact is not applicable to the District 6 project. There may be some areas where construction activities are within the 25-feet vibration area for structures, though only lower vibration equipment will be used for this project. Any potential impacts from vibration will be mitigated by Mitigation Measure 3.9-2. Figure 2-2 shows the 25-foot notification buffer where structures will be notified. Figures 2-3 through 2-5 provide additional detail in segments of the District 6 Project where structures lie within the notification area. Therefore,the level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. The Upper Reach of the project is outside of the John Wayne Airport planning area(Orange County Airport Land Use Commission,2008).There are no other airstrips within the vicinity of the project.Therefore,the District 6 Project would result in no noise impacts related to a public use airport or private airstrip. August 2016 2-36 1136054.1 L A Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL Figure 2.3: Vibration Notification Area for MH130-MH140 f Tr t .. i August 2016 2.38 1136054.1 :t a 1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL Figure 2.5: Vibration Notification Area for MH190-MH210 Ct�t h' v .i 2.1.13 Population and Housing There would be no significant impacts to population or housing from the District 6 project because the project will allow the area to accommodate planned growth that would occur with or without the District 6 Project.Further,the District 6 project will not displace housing or people because it accommodates planned growth patterns and does not affect existing housing and involves and underground sewer line. Therefore, the level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. 2.1.14 Public Services The Project calls for the rehabilitation or replacement of an existing,underground trunk sewer line. The Project will not require the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities which, in and of themselves, could cause significant environmental impacts. All of the identified traffic impacts from the 2007 PEIR would also be incurred by the District 6 project, and require mitigation.Mitigation Measure 3.11-1 will be implemented to reduce the traffic impacts from temporary construction activities that could affect emergency responders, local service providers, and August 2016 240 113W54.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL schools. Provision of the project's Traffic Control Plan, required by Mitigation Measure 3.12-1, to emergency services departments prior to construction will allow first responders to be aware of and plan around the potential traffic impacts,while 72-hour notice of construction to local service providers at each pipeline segment will similarly allow them to plan around the traffic impacts. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. Given the close proximity of a hospital to the construction area, there could be an impact on access to emergency medical facilities. Mitigation Measure 3.11-2 will allow for at least one access road to the hospital at all times, and will be particularly important during pipeline realignment, which will require trenching in the shoulder of a major artery(Newport Blvd.). Trenches me an integral part of the District 6 project, both for the new pipeline alignment and for the pipe bursting activities, so there is potential for safety impacts from trenches,which will require Mitigation Measures 3.11-3a through 3.11-3c to reduce to less than significant.These mitigation measures will ensure safe closing of trenches,secured open trenches to avoid accidents, covering of trenches as appropriate, establishment of other safety measures, and restoration of disturbed areas following completion of construction.The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. Security will be important to protect equipment during storage and site staging from vandalism, which could occur to unsecured equipment that must remain at or near the project site because construction will take multiple days to complete. Mitigation Measure 3.11-4 will secure equipment and storage areas to protect from potential vandalism.The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. Waste will be produced by the construction activities associated with the District 6 project,which requires proper disposal. Mitigation Measures 3.11-5a and 3.11-5b will ensure proper disposal and mitigate the impacts to public services from improper disposal of waste. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. Preliminary design plans indicate nearby existing utilities along the pipeline route within the existing right- of-way in which the pipeline will be constructed.Utilities along the pipeline route should be identified and Mitigation Measures 3.11-6a through 3.11-6c implemented to reduce impacts associated with disruptions to existing utilities.The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. It is unlikely that the District 6 project will affect the compatibility of existing and future projects because it is designed to address planned needs,but to ensure that it will not,OCSD will coordinate with the Orange County Resources and Development Management Department and otherjurisdictions as required through Mitigation Measure 3.11-7. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. 2.1.15 Recreation The District 6 project is not located near recreation facilities, and as a sewer trunk relief project, does not include recreation facilities.Therefore,it will not have an impact on the recreational environment or impact the environment through recreational facilities. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. 2.1.16 Transportation and Traffic As identified in the Program EIR, the project will have traffic impacts because construction will occur within the roadway and the paved shoulder. Although the District 6 project will have transportation and traffic impacts, these impacts will be to a lesser degree than those of the project in the PEIR because less replacement activities are required than the project evaluated in the PEER.While many of these impacts can and will be mitigated to less-than-significant,lane closures(Impact 3.12-2)are significant and unavoidable August 2016 241 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PER District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL as identified in the 2007 PEIR, as they are a necessary temporary, construction-related impact. Traffic impacts and road closures were considered when selecting the District 6 Project, which avoids open trenching for the Newport Blvd. crossing. Despite the unavoidable nature of the lane closures,Mitigation Measures 3.12-2a through 3.12-2f will be implemented to reduce impacts from lane closures. These mitigation measures include staging equipment within closed lanes or outside of the roadway, providing signage informing the public of the project prior to commencement of construction,the use of traffic cones and/or guards, consideration of traffic impacts in project selection, minimizing lane closures during peak traffic hours,delineating suitable detours,and coordinating with local jurisdictions and Caltrans.Therefore, the level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. Traffic impacts that can be mitigated to less-than-significant include construction activities occurring within city streets (Impact 3.12-I) and impacts to emergency access. Impact 13.2-1 will be mitigated to less than significance because most construction activities will occur in the public right-of-way, will involve lane closures and related traffic impacts,and all phases will involve some degree of excavation.Mitigation can be achieved with traffic controls(from the Traffic Control Plan);restoration of roads following completion of project; coordination with Caltrans and other agencies with jurisdiction over roadway rights-of-way as appropriate; consultation with emergency service providers regarding access; consultation with Orange County Transportation Authority regarding impacts to bus route and station accessibility; rerouting of construction traffic(mainly trucks)to avoid sensitive receptors including a nearby hospital, school,places of worship, and post office; and public input during planning phase. Mitigation Measure 3.12-lk is not applicable to the District 6 project because no construction will occur in the railway right-of-way. Emergency access concerns will be mitigated as described here and under Public Services through Mitigation Measures 3.12-1 g, 3.11-1,and 3.11-2. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. A less-than-significant impact will occur on parking capacity because curbside parking may be limited during construction,however,this is a non-significant amount of curbside parking,and will only be short- term. There will be no long-term impacts on parking from the District 6 project, which will not affect parking facilities or change land use such that parking impacts occur.There will be no impacts on air traffic patterns from the District 6 project because it does not affect nearby airports or air traffic. The project will also not include any hazardous design features as part of its compliance with local ordinances and construction standards. Finally, the project will not impact or conflict with adopted plans, policies or programs supporting alternative transportation because the project will not affect transportation beyond short-term lane closures. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. Additional Transportation and Traffic Analysis In accordance with the findings of the Environmental Analysis for transportation and traffic(Table 2-19), above, Table 3-8 of the 2007 PEIR should be revised to accurately reflect the transit routes, cross streets, and references for the District 6 project. Appendix G includes the original Table 3-8 as presented in the 2007 PEIR,edited only to reflect changes related to the District 6 project,with additions in underline, and deletions in stnkat4augh.A summary of these changes is presented here: • The End Date for the District 6 Project has been changed from 2010 to 2017 • Newport Beach Blvd.was changed from two lanes to six and updated to Transit Route 71 • Two additional streets were added under the City of Newport Beach for the District 6 Project: o Newport Beach Blvd.at Hospital Rd.was added.At this cross street Newport Beach Blvd. is 6 lanes,classified as arterial,and uses signals for traffic control August 2016 242 113054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL o Superior Ave. at 16't Street was added. This is a four lane road with signals for traffic control. • The URL for the OCTA bus route was updated to fix a broken link. 2.1.17 Utilities and Service Systems The District 6 project will address previously identified present and future needs and will therefore not exceed any unanticipated wastewater treatment requirements. It is also part of the Sanitation District Strategic Plan, and will therefore not result in construction or expansion of water or wastewater treatment facilities above what is included in the Strategic Plan. Inclusion of the project in the Strategic Plan also means that there will not be an impact related to wastewater treatment capacity because the capacity expansion resulting from this project is designed to address previously identified and planned for needs. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. The District 6 project will not construct storm drains,nor will it create new runoff or redirect flow to storm drains,therefore there will be no expansion of the storm drain system related to the project. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. The project will not require the provision of new water supplies—existing supplies me sufficient to meet the project needs (construction-related water use) and will not result in impacts to water entitlements or resources.All solid waste will be disposed of in accordance with applicable federal,state,and local statutes and regulations, as part of normal project activities, therefore no impacts are associated with compliance with federal, state, and local statues related to solid waste. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. For these reasons,there are no impacts associated with the Utilities and Service Systems,with the exception of sufficient permitted capacity at the landfill to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs.The impacts to landfill capacity are less-than-significant because of the small size of the project and the anticipated amount of solid waste to be produced.The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. 2.1.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance There are short-term construction related impacts associated with air quality,noise,and transportation that have been found to be significant and unavoidable in the 2007 PEIR.Mitigation measures applicable to the District 6 Project(refer to Section 1.4.2 of this Addendum)will reduce the cumulative impacts for all other resource areas to less-than-significant. The level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in the 2007 PEIR. August 2016 243 1136054.1 Addendum to the Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief Chapter 2 Environmental Checklist FINAL 2.2 Environmental Determination CEQA Guidelines §15164 dictates that an addendum to an EIR shall be prepared if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in §15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. An addendum need not be circulated for public review, but the decision- making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR(including an explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR)prior to making a decision on the project(CEQA Guidelines §15164). Based upon the evidence in light of the whole record documented in the Chapter 2,Environmental Checklist analysis, cited incorporations, and attachments,I find that the Project: ❑ Has NOT been previously analyzed as part of an earlier CEQA document(which either mitigated the project or adopted impacts pursuant to findings)adopted/certified pursuant to CEQA Guidelines. Preparation of adequate CEQA environmental documentation is required. ❑ Has previously been analyzed as part of an earlier CEQA document(which either mitigated the project or adopted impacts pursuant to findings)adopted/certified pursuant to CEQA Guidelines. The proposed project is a component of the whole action analyzed in the previously adopted/certified CEQA document. No additional CEQA documentation is required. ® Has previously been analyzed as part of an earlier CEQA document(which either mitigated the project or adopted impacts pursuant to findings)adopted/certified pursuant to CEQA Guidelines. Minor additions and/or clarifications are needed to make the previous documentation adequate to cover the project which are documented in this addendum to the earlier CEQA document (CEQA §15164).No additional CEQA documentation is required. ❑ Has previously been analyzed as part of an earlier CEQA document(which either mitigated the project or adopted impacts pursuant to findings)adopted/certified pursuant to State and County CEQA Guidelines. However,there is important new information and/or substantial changes have occurred requiring the preparation of an additional CEQA document(ND,MND,or EIR) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 through 15163. Signed Name and Title Date August 2016 244 1136054.1 Addendum to Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief References FINAL Chapter 3 Report Preparation 3.1 Report Authors 3.1.1 Orange County Sanitation District • Adam Nazaroff,Project Manager • Randa AbuShaban,Associate Engineer(Air Quality specialist) • Daisy Covamrbias, Senior Staff Analyst 3.1.2 RMC Water and Environment • Rosalyn Prickett,Senior Water Resources Planner • Sally Johnson,Water Resources Plarmer References California Department of Toxic Substances Control. EnviroStor. Accessed April 24, 2014. Available: http://www.envirostor.dtse.ca.gov/public/ California Division of Mines and Geology. 1976.Distribution of Peat Deposits in Orange County, California.Available: fto://ftp.consrv.ca.eov/nub/dme/pubs/ofr/OFR 79-08/OFR 79- 08 Plate5AB.12df California Geologic Survey(CGS).2010. Geologic Compilation of Quaternary Surficial Deposits in Southern California—Orange County.July. City of Newport Beach. 2006. General Plan — Safety Element. July 25. Available: htro://www.newportbeachca.eov/PLN/General Plan/12 Chit Safety web. ddf City of Newport Beach. 2015. Zoning Map. January 13. Available: http://www.nevMortbeachca.gov/Pln/Zoning_Code_Adopted/Zoning Map.pdf Costa Mesa.2015.Zoning Map. June 8.Available: http://www.costamesaca.gov/modules/showdocument.aspx?doc=entid=7259 Daly&Associates.2015.Application of Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures Impact 3.4-1 of the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Orange County Sanitation District Collection System Improvement Plan.Letter dated July 11. Orange County Airport Land Use Commission.2008.Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport,amended. April 17. Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD).2007a. Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, Collection System Improvement Plan. SCH#2006101018.Prepared by IPMC. March. Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD).2007b. Final Program Environmental Impact Report, Collection System Improvement Plan. SCH#2006101018. Prepared by IPMC. June. RMC.2013.OCSD District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project No. 6-17 Final Preliminary Design Report. October. August 2016 3-1 1136054.1 Addendum to Collection System Improvement Plan FOR District 6 Sewer Trunk Relief References FINAL State Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker. Accessed April 24, 2014. Available: htto://aeotrackef.waterboards.ca.gov/default.aso August 2016 3-2 1136054.1 Appendix A - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan from the 2007 PEIR 1136054A Page intentionally blank. 1136054.1 TABLEA-1 Mbgation Ivbndodpg and Repomng Program k)rthe Cofiechon System hrprovement Plan Air Quality Impact 3.2-1: Construction activities would Generate NOx emissions in exceedence of the daily significance thresholds resulting in a short-term impact to air quality. Significant Unavoidable. Mitigation Measure 3.2-1 a: Contractors will maintain equipment engines in proper tune and operate construction equipment so as to minimize exhaust emissions. Mitigation Measure 3.2-1b: During construction,trucks and vehicles in loading or unloading queues will keep engines off,when not in use,to reduce vehicle emissions. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include construction equipment exhaust Maintain record of contract specifcations to verify Sanitation District During Design. minimization and vehicle emissions reduction adherence to mitigation measures. mitigation measures in contract specifications. 2. Conduct periodic site inspections to verify Maintain record of site inspection to verify adherence to Sanitation District During Construction. adherence to mitigation measures. mitigation measures. Impact 3.2-2: Construction activities would produce fugitive dust emissions resulting in a short-teml impact to air quality. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.2-2: Contractors will reduce fugitive dust emissions through implementation of the following dust control measures: • Cover all trucks hauling soil,sand,or other loose materials • Apply water as necessary on all unpaved access roads, parking areas,and staging areas at construction sites • Sweep all paved access roads, parking areas,and staging areas at construction sites with sweepers • Water or apply nontoxic soil stabilizers to exposed soil stockpiles or areas disturbed by construction activities which produce dust • Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include fugitive dust control measures Maintain record of contract specifications to verify Sanitation District During Design. in contract specifications. adherence to mitigation measures. 2. Conduct periodic site inspections to Maintain record of site inspection to verify Sanitation District During Construction. verify adherence to mitigation adherence to mitigation measures. measures. WBDI21 MuS�MDP©aW13TD 15oXc3 1 TABLEA-1 Mhgation Mmdomrg and Repmalg Program forthe Collection System hrpmvement Plan Biological Resources Impact 3.3-1: Areas of natural habitat within the footprint of proposed activities could impact special-status biological resources. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.3.1: Evaluation of impacts to special-status plants, birds, mammals,and amphibians and reptiles will occur at the project level. Specifically,all areas of natural habitat within the footprint of proposed construction activities with potential to support special-status biological resources will be surveyed according to standard protocol.Where special-status biological resources are identified within the project footprint,appropriate avoidance, minimization,and mitigation measures will be implements.Depending on the special-status biological resources present,measures could include the following: Where rare plants are identified within the project footprint,the following avoidance,minimization,and mitigation measures will be implemented: • Project design will be evaluated to determine if an exclusionary zone can be established around rare plant populations;where feasible,this will be implemented,and construction activities will be relocated or modified to avoid impact. • If rare plant populations cannot be avoided,appropriate salvage of plant propagules will be implemented,and suitable habitats for transplanting or re- establishing population will be identified and implemented. • Mitigation will include an analysis of suitability of alternative locations and identification of suitable propagation techniques. • Procurement of conservation easements will be implemented for alternative suitable habitats if the habitats are not already secured with conservation status. Where special-status nesting birds are identified within the project footprint,the following avoidance,minimization,and mitigation measures will be implemented: • Project design will be evaluated to determine if a 500-foot minimum exclusionary zone can be established around active bird nests;where feasible,this will be implemented,and construction activities will be relocated or modified to avoid impact. • If nesting birds or active nest sites cannot be avoided,construction will be timed to avoid the active nesting season(February to August), and construction activities will not commence in the vicinity of nests until young have Fledged. Where special-status mammals or bat roosts are identified within the project footprint,the following avoidance, minimization,and mitigation measures will be implemented: • Project design will be evaluated to determine if a 500-foot minimum exclusionary zone can be established around active bat roosts;where feasible,this will be implemented,and construction activities will be relocated or modified to avoid impact. • Project design will be evaluated to determined direct impacts to habitats supporting small mammals can be avoided with an exclusionary zone;where feasible,this will be implemented,and construction activities will be relocated or modified to avoid impact. • Where avoidance is not feasible,trapping or hazing of special-status mammals to remove them from the project site will be implemented,and individuals will be relocated to suitable habitat nearby;temporary fencing will be installed to prohibit species from returning to the construction zone. • If construction adjacent to bat roosts cannot be avoided,construction will be timed to avoid the parturition period(February to August),and construction activities will not commence in the vicinity of maternity roosts until young are weaned. WBDIalW0019CUTMRP IXSDP©RWL3]DSPoJISW WS 2 TABLE A-1 Mbgation Mmdomrg and Reporting Program forthe Collechon System M1mrovemmrent Plan • If construction must occur during the parturition period,then active bat roosts will be excluded prior to onset of breeding. Where special-status amphibians and reptiles are identified within the project footprint,the following avoidance, minimization,and mitigation measures will be implemented: • Project design will be evaluated to determine if direct impacts to habitats supporting amphibians or reptiles can be avoided with an exclusionary zone;where feasible,this will be implemented,and construction activities will be relocated or modified to avoid impact. • Where avoidance is not feasible,trapping or hazing of special-status amphibians or reptiles to remove them from the project site will be implemented,and individuals will be relocated to suitable habitat nearby;temporary fencing will be installed to prohibit species from returning to the construction zone. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Conduct biological surveys of all areas of Maintain biological survey reports for Sanitation District,California Department During Design. natural habitat within the Project area. administrative record. of Fish and Game(CDFG),U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS) 2. Include any requirements in contract Maintain record of contract specifications for Sanitation District During Design. specifications(if needed). Include administrative record. necessary actions to address potential for encountering biological resources. 3. Implement above stated mitigation Document implementation of mitigation Sanitation District During Design. During measures(if needed). measures for administrative record. Construction. 4. Conduct periodic site inspections to verify Maintain record of site inspections. Sanitation District,CDFG, USFWS During Construction. adherence to mitigation measures. 5. For unplanned encounters with biological Document implementation of mitigation. Sanitation District,CDFG, USFWS During Construction. resources,contact a qualified biologist and implement mitigation as appropriate. WBDIXOWOIS�MDP©R 37, S 15WXB 3 TABLEA-1 Mbgation MundormA and ReporlmA Pro¢ram lorthe Collecton System l mnowment Plan Impact 3.3-2: Runoff from construction activities could impact aquatic fisheries. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.3-2: To avoid impacts to aquatic fisheries, best management practices will be implemented to avoid contaminant runoff from construction practices.This will include the following: • Equipment will not be operated in areas of ponded or flowing water. Stationary equipment such as motors, pumps,generators,and welders will be located a minimum of 200 feet outside aquatic and wetland habitats;construction staging areas,stockpiling,and equipment storage will be located a minimum of 200 feet outside aquatic and wetland habitats. • Construction vehicles and equipment will be checked periodically to ensure that proper working conditions with no potential for fugitive emissions of oil and other hazardous products exists.Refueling or lubrication of vehicles and cleaning of equipment,or other activities that involve open use of fuels,lubricants, or solvents,will occur in upland locations at least 200 feet away from aquatic or wetland habitats. • Temporary sediment-retention structures, hay bales,or silt fencing will be placed downstream of construction areas; sediment-retention devices will prevent sediment-laden water from draining offsite;sediment-retention devices structures will be maintained and repaired after flood events. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include best management practices Maintain record of contract Sanitation District, U.S.Army Corps of Prior to Approval of Plans and and requirements in contract specifications for administrative Engineers(USACE), Regional Water Quality Specifications. specifications. record. Control Board(RWQCB),CDFG 2. Conduct periodic construction site Maintain record of site inspections. Sanitation District, USACE, RWQCB,CDFG During Construction. inspections. Impact 3.3-3: Project activities within jurisdictional areas, including wetlands,would result in impacts to biological resources. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.3.3: Direct impacts to jurisdictional areas including wetlands generally will be avoided by identifying these communities at the project analysis level and designing project components to avoid these areas.However,if impacts to jurisdictional wetlands cannot be avoided,then the following mitigation will be implemented: • Delineation of affected jurisdictional sites will be implemented and impacts analyzed;this information will support permit applications to the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers(USACE)under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. • A proposed mitigation plan to compensate for impacts to jurisdictional areas will be developed and approved by the USACE; it will be implemented to compensate for impacts. • To avoid indirect impacts to jurisdictional areas from contaminant runoff, Mitigation Measure 3.3-2 will be implemented. WBDI21pWS�MDP©RWL137, S 15WO(a 4 TABLE A-1 MhA lion Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Collection System improvement Plan Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Complete jurisdictional delineation of Maintain record of judsdictional Sanitation District, USACE, RWQCB, During Design. waters and/or wetlands, delineation for administrative record. CDFG 2. Acquire above stated permit if activities Maintain record of permit for Sanitation District, USACE, RWQCB, Prior to Commencement of will occur within jurisdictional waters or administrative record. CDFG Construction Activities. wetlands. 3. Include requirement for permit Maintain record of contract specifications Sanitation District During Construction. compliance in contract specifications. for administrative record. 4. Implement compensatory mitigation. Maintain record of compensatory Sanitation District, USACE, RWQCB, After Construction. mitigation. CDFG Cultural Resources Impact 3.4-1: Project activities could affect known,significant archaeological, paleontological,and historical resources. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.4.1: During preliminary design a Registered Professional Archaeologist(RPA)will complete a literature review using the archives of the South Central Coastal Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System(CHRIS),located at California State University Fullerton,and other sources as needed to identify previous cultural resources studies and previously recorded archaeological sites within close proximity to the project alignment.The literature search will also include a search of the Sacred Lands Database maintained by the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Using the results of the literature review in part,the archaeologist will develop a cultural resources sensitivity map for the project alignment,followed by a determination of specific areas of the project that may require preconstmction survey,subsurface testing,or construction monitoring. Cultural resources identified as a result of the literature review,field survey,testing,or construction monitoring will be evaluated by a Registered Professional Archaeologist to determine whether they meet the criteria for designation as a historical resource(14 CCR§4850, PRC§21084.1, 14 CCR§15064.5(3))or a"unique archeological resource"as defined in PRC§21083.2. If resources are present on state lands,Office of Historic Preservation(OHP)will be consulted (PRC§21083.2). For sites within project alignment where human remains have been previously documented,the Sanitation District would enter into a written agreement between an archaeological consultant,to be retained by the Sanitation District, and a Native American representative prior to construction in the vicinity of these sites. This agreement would specify terms as to the treatment and disposition of the human remains,and will define"associated burial goods"with reference to PRC §5097.94,5097.98,and 5097.99 and Health and Safety Code§7050.5. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. RPA completes record search and develops Retain record search and sensitivity Sanitation District,CHRIS, NAHC During Design. sensitivity map. map. 2. Conduct preconstruclion survey/subsurface Maintain record of preconstmction Sanitation District During Design. testing(if needed). survey/subsurface testing. WBDI21 MAS�MDP©RW13]D0CKM5W3 5 TABLE A-1 Magnum MmitomrA and Reporting Programi Collection System hrprovement Plan 3. Include any requirements in contract Monitor compliance With construction Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and specifications(if needed). contract specifications. Specifications. 4. Consult with OHP(if needed). Document consultation with CHIP. Sanitation District,CHIP During Design. 5. Conduct construction monforing(if needed). Maintain record of construction Sanitation District During Construction. oversight for administrative record. 5. Enter agreement with archaeological consultant Retain agreement. Sanitation District,Native Prior to Commencement of and Native American representative(if needed). American representative Construction Activities. Impact 3.4.2: Construction excavation could expose,encounter,or accidentally discover cultural resources, including buried human remains. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.4-2a: Subsurface construction has the potential for exposing significant subsurface cultural resources. Due to the likelihood of encountering cultural resources,the Sanitation District will implement the following prior to commencement of construction activities: • Prior to construction,contractors,and Sanitation District staff will receive an archaeological orientation from a professional archaeologist regarding the types of resources that could be uncovered during construction activities and the identifoation of these resources.The orientation also will cover procedures to follow in the case of any archaeological discovery. Mitigation Measure 3.4-2b: If cultural resources are encountered at any time during project excavation,construction personnel will avoid altering these materials and their context until a qualified archaeologist has evaluated the situation. Project personnel will not collect or retain cultural resources. Prehistoric resources include, but are not limited to, chart or obsidian flakes, projectile points,mortars and pestles,dark friable sail containing shell and bone,dietary debris, heat-affected rock,or human burials. Historic resources induce stone or adobe foundations or walls;structures and remains with square nails,and refuse deposits(glass, metal,wood,ceramics)often found in old wells and privies. Mitigation Measure 3.4.2c: In the event accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains,the county coroner will be notified immediately,and construction activities will be halted. If the remains are found to be Native American,the Native American Heritage Commission will be notified within 24 hours. Guidelines of the Native American Heritage Commission will be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Conduct archaeological orientation from a Document completion of archaeological Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and professional archaeologist. orientation for administrative record. Specifications. 2. Include necessary actions in contract specifications Maintain record of contract specifications, Sanitation District,NAHC, During Design. to address potential for encountering cultural including geolechnical evaluation for County Coroner resources and/or human remains. administrative record. 3. In the event of accidental discovery of buried human Stop work and notify county coroner, Sanitation District,NAHC, During Construction. remains,implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-2c. archaeologist,and NAHC. County Coroner WBDI21e]OOISCUMNiP IXSDP©RWLJ]DSAJI500003 6 TABLEA-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program iorthe Collection System hrprovement Plan Geology and Soils Impact 3.5-1: Project facilities would be located in areas susceptible to seismicity and groundshaking. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.5-1: The Sanitation District will design and construct new facilities in accordance with Sanitation District standards and/or applicable building codes. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Conduct design level geotechnical evaluations Maintain record of contract specifications, including Sanitation District During Design. and include in contract specifications. geotechnical evaluation for administrative record. 2. Require compliance with Sanitation District Maintain record of contract specifications, including Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and standards and/or applicable building codes in geotechnical evaluation for administrative record. Specifications. contract specifications. 3. Construct facilities according to contract Maintain record of inspections as appropriate. Sanitation District During Construction. specifications. Impact 3.5-2: Project facilities could be placed in areas with the potential for liquefaction. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.5.2: Soil surveys will be conducted to determine the liquefaction potential along the collection system improvement routes. Pipelines will be installed within consolidated,engineered backfill. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Conduct design level geotechnical evaluations Maintain record of contract specifications, Sanitation District During Design. and include in contract specifications. including geotechnical evaluation for administrative record. 2. Include requirement for pipelines to be Maintain record of contract specifications, Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and installed within consolidated,engineered including geotechnical evaluation for Specifications. backfill,in contract specifications. administrative record. 3. Construct facilities according to contract Maintain record of inspections as appropriate. Sanitation District During Construction. specifications. WBDIap]OOISCUMNiP IXSDP©RWLJ]DSAJI500003 '/ TABLE A-1 Mtigaton Mmdonng and Reporting Prouram lbrthe Collechon System improvement Plan Impact 3.53: Project facilities could be placed in soils susceptible to settlement. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.53: Areas of peat bogs will be consolidated before construction or peat material will be removed prior to construction. Pipelines will be installed within consolidated,engineered backfill. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Conduct design level geotechnical evaluations Maintain record of contract specifications, including Sanitation District During Design. and include in contract specifications. geotechnical evaluation for administrative record. 2. Include requirement for pipelines to be Maintain record of contract specifications, including Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans installed within consolidated,engineered geotechnical evaluation for administrative record. and Specifications. backfill,in contract specifications. 3. Construct facilities according to contract Maintain record of inspections as appropriate. Sanitation District During Construction. specifications. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact 3.6-1: Transportation of hazardous materials associated with Project activities could result in a hazards and hazardous materials related impact. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.6-1: Transportation of hazardous materials will be in accordance with all federal,stale,and local regulations. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include requirements for hazardous materials Maintain record of contract specifications for Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and transportation in contract specifications. administrative record. Specifications. Impact 3.6-2: Storage of hazardous materials associated with Project activities could result in a hazards and hazardous materials related impact. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.6-2: Prior to storage of hazardous materials,a Hazardous Materials Inventory and Business Emergency Plan will be filed with the Orange County Fire Authority. WBDIap]OOISCUMNiP IXSDP©RWLJ]DSAJI500003 8 TABLE A-1 Mbgation Mundornig and Reporting Proizam forthe Collechon System li provement Plan Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include requirement for completing Hazardous Maintain record of contract specifications for Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and Materials Inventory and Business Emergency administrative record. Specifications. Plan in contract specifications. Impact 3.63: Accidental spill of hazardous materials associated with Project activities could result in a hazards and hazardous materials related impact. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.63: In the event of an accidental spill,containment and cleanup will occur in conformance with the spill response and waste disposal procedures identified in the Material Safety Data Sheets(MSDS)and in the Business Emergency Plan. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include requirement for spill containment and Maintain record of contract specifications for Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and cleanup in contract specifications. administrative record. Specifications. Impact 3.63: Improper disposal of hazardous materials could result in a hazards and hazardous materials related impact. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.6-4: Disposal of hazardous waste generated as part of construction or operation activities will occur at a property permitted facility in accordance with federal and state laws. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include requirements for disposal of hazardous Maintain record of contract specifications for Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and waste in contract specifications. administrative record. Specifications. Impact 3.65: Improperly abandoned oil wells may exist within excavation alignments. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.6.5a: Prior to construction,the Sanitation District will identify existing and abandoned oil production wells within the project area using California Department of Conservation,California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas,and Geothermal Resources(DOGGR), District 1 well location maps.Access to identified non-abandoned oil wells will be maintained.Previously abandoned wells identified beneath proposed structures or utility corridors may need to be plugged to current DOGGR specifications including adequate gas venting systems. Mitigation Measure 3.6.5b: Should construction activities uncover previously unidentified oil production wells,the DOGGR will be notified,and the well will be abandoned following DOGGR specifications for well abandonment. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include in contract Maintain record of contract specifications for Sanitation District, DOGGR Prior to Construction. specifications. administrative record. 2. Construct facilities according Maintain record of inspections as appropriate. Sanitation District During Construction. to contract specifications. WBDI21pWS�MDP©R 37, S 1500003 9 TABLE A-1 Mitgaton Mmdonng and Reporalg Propam forthe Collectan System improvement Plan Impact 3.6-6: Construction activities could encounter areas of contamination, including contamination associated with leaking underground storage tanks. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.6-6: During project design,a database screening would be completed for listing of all known contamination sites,including contamination associated with leaking underground storage tanks.Additionally,soils sampling would be completed for the presence of total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons(TRPH),volatile organics,and metals. In the event of suspected contamination from adjacent land uses,soil sampling would be completed to verify hazardous substances. Under the Sanitation District's standard construction specifications,the Sanitation District and its contractors would comply with all applicable regulatory requirements for the assessment,testing, remediation, removal, and disposal of hazardous wastes/materials. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Complete database screening. Maintain record of database screening. Sanitation District During Design. 2. Complete soil sampling for TRPH. Maintain record of soil sampling. Sanitation District During Design. 3. Include requirements for assessment,testing, remediation removal, Maintain record of contract specifications Sanitation District During Design. During and disposal(if applicable), in the contract specifications. for administrative record. Construction. 4. Construct facilities according to contract specifications. Maintain record of inspections as Sanitation District During Construction. appropriate. Hydrology and Water Quality Impact 3.7-1: Construction activities could result in erosion and siltation related stormwater impacts to surface water quality. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.7-1: Prior to the initiation of ground-disturbing activities for sewer improvements with surface disturbances of 1 acre or more,the Sanitation District(or its designee)will obtain approval from the State Water Resources Control Board(State Board)under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity(General Permit).This includes submitting a Notice of Intent(NOI)to the Stale Board and developing and implementing a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP). For sewer improvements with lass than 1 acre of surface disturbances,the Sanitation District(or its designee)will develop and implement a Stormwater Pollution Control Plan(SWPCP)prior to initiating ground-disturbing activities.The SWPPP or SWPCP will identify potential sources of sediment and other pollutants that could affect the quality of the stormwater discharge, and will specify best management practices(BMPs)to prevent or minimize the introduction of sediment and pollutants into surface waters from a construction site. BMP methods of erosion and sediment control might include straw bales,silt fences,and other control techniques.Monitoring and maintenance requirements will be specified in the SWPPP or SWPCP. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include requirement for stormwater permit Maintain record of contract specifications for Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and in contract specifications. administrative record. Specifications. 2. Include requirement for SWPPP or Maintain record of contract specifications for Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and SWPCP in contract specifications. administrative record. Specifications. WBDIMW*IS�MDP© vU3]D0V071500003 10 TABLE A-1 MIigation Monitoring and Reporting Program forthe Collectan System lop owment Plan 3. Conduct periodic construction site Maintain record of site inspections. Sanitation District, SWRCB, During Construction. inspections. RWQCB Impact 3.7-2: Project activities within jurisdictional areas, including wetlands,would result in impacts to biological resources.Construction activities could also result in impacts to jurisdictional areas associated with equipment refueling and vehicle use. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.7.2: Prior to initiating activities within Waters of the Unites States,including jurisdictional wetlands,the Sanitation District(or its designee) will obtain the approved 401 Water Quality Certification from the Regional Water Quality Control Board(Regional Board),the 1600 Streambed Alteration Agreement from California Department of Fish and Game(CDFG),and the 404 Permit from the USACE.Vehicle maintenance and fueling will be restricted from areas within 50 feet of the bank of a jurisdictional area.Following construction within a jurisdictional area,the affected area will be returned to preconstruction grade. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Acquire above stated permits if activities will Maintain record of permits for Sanitation District, USACE, RWQCB, During Design. occur within jurisdictional waters or wetlands. administrative record. CDFG 2. Include requirement for permit compliance in Maintain record of contract specifications Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans contract specifications. for administrative record. and Specifications. 3. Conduct periodic construction site Maintain record of site inspections. Sanitation District, USACE, RWQCB, During Construction. inspections. CDFG Impact 3.73: Construction dewatering discharges could result in impacts to surface water quality. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.73: Prior to the initiation of construction dewatering activities the Sanitation District(or its designee)will obtain authorization from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and will comply with the NPDES Permit No. CAG998001,General Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges to Surface Waters that Pose an Insignificant(De Minimus)Threat to Water Quality,for insignificant discharges to surface water bodies, including but not limited to discharge of dewatered groundwater. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include requirement for construction dewatering Maintain record of contract specifications Sanitation District, RWQCB Prior to Approval of Plans and permit authorization in contract specifications. for administrative record. Specifications. 2. Conduct periodic construction site inspections. Maintain record of site inspections. Sanitation District, RWQCB During Construction. Land Use and Planning Impact 3.8-1: Construction activities could impact adjacent property owners, including businesses and places of worship. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.8.1: The Sanitation District will provide notices of construction to adjacent property owners, including businesses and places of worship, prior to initiating construction activities. Notices of construction will include a contact and telephone number of Sanitation District staff that can be contacted regarding questions or concerns about construction activities. W 12m7WlSCQMM MDP©aW137D0C0715W3 11 TABLE A-1 Mitigation fvbndormA and Reporting Proizam forthe Collechon System hxprovement Plan Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include the preparation and distribution of notifications Maintain record of notifications. Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and prior to construction activities in contract specifications. Specifications. 2. Contractor provides notification. Maintain record of notifications. Sanitation District Prior to Commencement of Construction Activities. Impact 3.8.2: Construction activities could affect 24-hour emergency access at adjacent fire stations, police stations,and hospitals. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.8.2: The Sanitation District will coordinate with officials of adjacent fire stations, police stations,and hospitals to ensure that 24-hour emergency access is available. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include 24-hour emergency access in Maintain record of contract specifications Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and contract specifications. for administrative record. Specifications. 2. Coordinate with local authorities. Maintain record of communication with Sanitation District, Local Authorities During Construction. local authorities. 3. Conduct periodic construction site Maintain record of site inspections. Sanitation District, Local Authorities During Construction. inspections. Impact 3.83: Construction activities could result in disruption of access to adjacent land uses including schools. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.83: To minimize disruption of access to driveways of adjacent land uses including schools during construction,the Sanitation District(or its contractor)will maintain steel trench plates to provide vehicle access across trenches. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include steel trench plates for access to Contact local jurisdictions for specific steel trench Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and driveways affected by trenches in contract plating requirements. Maintain record of contract Specifications. specifications. specifications for administrative record. 2. Conduct periodic construction site Maintain record of site inspections. Sanitation District During Construction. inspections. Impact 3.83: Construction activities could result in disruption to adjacent businesses. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.8.4: To minimize disruption to adjacent businesses during construction,the Sanitation District will provide temporary signage indicating that businesses are open. WEOIXOWSCUTbRPMDP©a 37, S 150WS 12 TABLE A-1 MIigabou Monitoring and Reporting Program forthe Collection System lmarovement Plan Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include signage for impacted Maintain record of contract specifications Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and businesses in contract specifications. for administrative record. Specifications. 2. Conduct periodic construction site Maintain record of she inspections. Sanitation District During Construction. inspections. Noise Impact 3.9-1: Construction activities could result in short-term noise disruptions to surrounding areas. Significant Unavoidable. Mitigation Measure 3.9-1: To minimize noise disruption during construction,construction activities will generally be scheduled to occur during times allowed by applicable codes, noise ordinances or permits.Additionally,the following mitigations could be implemented as required: • Noise reduction measures such as sound blankets or temporary sound walls could be used to reduce noise generation from stationary noise generating equipment during construction. • Stationary noise generating equipment such as generators could be placed within the jacking pits where possible to reduce noise during construction. • Pile driving activities or other particularly disruptive construction could be limited to specific times agreed to with agencies of jurisdiction or adjacent property owners prior to construction. • Where appropriate, noise monitoring at the closest sensitive receptors could be conducted and reports submitted to the city ofjudsdiction. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include construction restrictions of applicable Maintain record of contract specifications Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and codes in contract specifications. for administrative record. Specifications. 2. Include construction noise mitigation Maintain record of contract specifications Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and measures in contract specifications. for administrative record. Specifications. 3. Conduct periodic construction site Maintain record of site inspections. Sanitation District During Construction. inspections. Impact 3.9.2: Construction activities could expose persons to,or generate,groundbome vibration. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.9-2: Project level review will be completed and will identify specific areas susceptible to groundbome vibration. For such identified areas, construction notification would occur and construction activities would be limited to times allowed by applicable codes,noise ordinances or permits. WBDIap]OOISCUMNiP IXSDP©RWLJ]DSAJI500003 13 TABLE A-1 Mtigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Collection System hrprovement Plan Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Complete project level review and Maintain record of project level review and Sanitation District During Design. identification of specific areas susceptible identification of specific areas susceptible to to groundborne vibration. groundbome vibration for administrative record. 2. Include construction restrictions of Maintain record of contract specifications for Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and applicable codes in contract specifications. administrative record. Specifications. 3. Include construction notification Maintain record of contract specifications for Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and requirements in contract specifications. administrative record. Specifcations. 4. Conduct periodic construction site Maintain record of site inspections. Sanitation District During Construction. inspections. Public Services Impact 3.11-1: Traffic impacts associated with construction activities could impact police departments,fire departments, local service providers,and schools. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.11-1: The contractor will provide a copy of the Traffic Control Plan to the Sheriffs Department, local police departments,and fire departments prior to construction.The Sanitation District will provide 72-hour notice of construction to the local service providers of individual pipeline segments. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Provide Traffic Control Plan to local Maintain Traffic Control Plan and record of Sanitation District Prior to Commencement of authorities,service providers,and schools, notifications for administrative record. Construction. prior to construction. 2. Include 72-hour notice of construction in Maintain Traffic Control Plan and record of Sanitation District During Construction. contract specifications. notifications for administrative record. 3. Contractor provides notification. Maintain record of notifications. Sanitation District Prior to Commencement of Construction Activities. Impact 3.11-2: Construction activities could impact access to fire stations and emergency medical facilities. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.11-2: Access to fire stations and emergency medical facilities will be maintained on a 24-hour basis,and at least one access to medical facilities will be available at all times during construction.The Sanitation District will notify appropriate officials at the medical facility regarding construction schedule. WBD121p]OOISCUMNiP IXSDP©RWLJ]DSAJ1500003 14 TABLE A-1 hbi2ation MandormA and Reporting Propam forthe Collechon System lmarovement Plan Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include 24-hour access requirements Maintain record of contract specifications Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and in construction contract specifications. and notifications for administrative record. Specifications. 2. Include medical facility notification in Maintain record of contract specifications Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and construction contract specifications. and notifications for administrative record. Specifications. 3. Conduct periodic construction site Maintain record of site inspections. Sanitation District, Fire Stations, During Construction. inspections. Emergency Medical Facilities Impact 3.11.3: Open trenches associated with construction activities could result in a safety impact. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.11-3a: Construction areas will be secured or trenches will be backflled promptly after pipeline installation. If installation is incomplete, steel trench plates will be used to cover open trenches as appropriate for the specific site. Mitigation Measure 3.113b: Construction contractors will ensure that adequate barriers are established to prevent pedestrians from entering the open trenches of an active construction area.Warnings will be posted sufficient distances from the work area to allow pedestrians to cross the street at controlled intersections. Mitigation Measure 3.11-3c: To ensure aesthetic consistency and public safety,construction contractors will restore disturbed areas along the alignment as mutually agreed by the Sanitation District and local jurisdictions prior to construction. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include site safety measures in Maintain record of contract specifications for Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and construction contract specification. administrative record. Specifications. 2. Include site restoration requirements Maintain record of contract specifications for Sanitation District During Design. in contract specifications. administrative record. 3. Conduct periodic construction site Maintain record of site inspections. Sanitation District During Construction. inspections. 4. Restore site according to contract Maintain record of site inspections. Sanitation District During Construction. specifications. Impact 3.11-4: During construction activities impacts associated with the vandalism of equipment at staging and storage areas could occur. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.11-4: Construction contractors will be responsible for providing appropriate security measures for all equipment staging and/or storage areas needed for sewer improvement projects. WBDI21pWS�G SDP©R 37, S 1500003 15 TABLE A-1 Mbgation Mantonng and Reporalg Proizamforthe Cofechon Systems provement Plan Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include contractor security responsibility in Maintain record of contract specifications for Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and the construction contract specification. administrative record. Specifcations. 2. Implement security measures in contract Maintain record of site inspections. Sanitation District During Construction. specifications. Impact 3.11.5: Improper disposal of construction refuse would impact public services. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.11-5a: Construction contractors will dispose of construction refuse at approved disposal locations.Contractors will not be permitted to dispose of construction debris in residential or business containers. Mitigation Measure 3.11-5b: Construction contractors will be required to keep construction and staging areas orderly,free of trash and debris. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include waste disposal methods in Maintain record of contract specifications for Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and construction contract specifications. administrative record. Specifications. 2. Implement waste disposal methods in Maintain record of she inspections. Sanitation District During Construction. contract specifications. Impact 3.11-6: Project activities could result in impacts associated with disruptions to existing utilities. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.11-6a: A detailed study identifying utilities along the pipeline routes will be conducted during the design stages of sewer improvement projects. For segments with potential adverse impacts,the following mitigations will be implemented. • Utility excavation or encroachment permits will be required from the appropriate agencies.These permits include measures to minimize utility disruption.The Sanitation District and its contractors will comply with permit conditions,and such conditions will be included in construction contract specifications. • Utility locations will be verified through field surveys. • Detailed specifications will be prepared as part of the design plans to include procedures for the excavation,support,and fill of areas around utility cables and pipes.All affected utility services will be notified of Sanitation District construction plans and schedule.Arrangements will be made with these entities regarding protection,relocation,or temporary disconnection of services. W 1200WS�MDP©RW13TcWM5W3 16 TABLE A-1 Mi igation Lvbnitormg and Reporting Program for the Collection System hrprovement Plan Mitigation Measure 3.11-6b: To reduce potential impacts associated with utility conflicts,the following measures will be implemented in conjunction with 3.11-6a. • Disconnected cables and lines will be promptly reconnected. • The Sanitation District will observe Department of Health and Safety(DHS)standards,which require a 10-foot horizontal separation between parallel sewer and water mains and 1-foot vertical separation between perpendicular water and sewer line crossings. In the event that the separation requirements cannot be maintained,the Sanitation District will obtain DHS variance through provisions of water encasement,or other means deemed suitable by DHS, and by encasing water mains in protective sleeves where a new sewer force main crosses under or over an existing sewer main. Mitigation Measure 3.11-6c: The construction contractor will comply with Sanitation District requirements and specifications to protect existing utility lines. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Complete underground utility surveys Maintain utility surveys for the Sanitation District During Design. as part of project design. administrative record. 2. Implement mitigation measures listed Maintain all appropriate Sanitation District During Design, During Construction. above. documentation. 3. Obtain permits,as appropriate. Maintain permits for the Sanitation District, Permitting Agencies Prior to commencement of construction administrative record. activities. 4. Include specific requirements related Maintain record of contract Sanitation District Prior to approval of plans and to utilities in construction contract specifications for administrative specifications, specifications. record. 5. Conduct periodic construction site Maintain record of site inspections. Sanitation District During Construction. Inspections. Impact 3.11-7: Projects could affect the compatibility of existing and future projects. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.11.7: The Sanitation District shall coordinate with the Orange County Resources and Development Management Department(RDMD) and other jurisdictions as required to ensure compatibility and joint-use feasibility with existing and future projects. Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Coordinate with local authorities to Maintain record of coordination for Sanitation District, RDMD,local During Design. ensure project compatibility. administrative record. jurisdictions,Caltrans 2. Include compatibility requirements in Maintain record of contract Sanitation District During Design. contract specifications. specifications for administrative record. WBDI21pWS�MDP©RW 37, S 1500003 17 TABLEA-1 Mitigation Mmdoring and Reporting Program forthe Collection System Improvement Plan 3. Construct facilities according to Maintain record of inspections as Sanitation District During Construction. contract specifications. appropriate. Transportation and Traffic Impact 3.12-1: Construction activities will occur within city streets and would impact tragic. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. Mitigation Measure 3.12-1a: Traffic control plans will be prepared by a qualified professional engineer as required prior to the construction phase of each sewer line project. Mitigation Measure 3.12-1b: Traffic control plans will consider the ability of alternative routes to carry additional traffic and will identify the least disruptive hours of construction,site truck access routes,and the type and location of warning signs, lights, and other traffic control devices. Consideration will be given to maintaining access to commercial parking lots,private driveways,sidewalks, bikeways,and equestrian trails to the greatest extent feasible. Mitigation Measure 3.1&1c: Encroachment permits for all work within or adjacent to public rights-of-way will be obtained from each appropriate agency prior to commencement of any construction.Agencies could include California Department of Transportation(Caltrans), RDMD and the various city agencies where work will occur.The Sanitation District will comply with traffic control requirements,as identified by Caltrans and the affected local jurisdictions. Mitigation Measure 3.12-1d: Traffic control plans will comply with the Work Area Traffic Control Handbook and/or the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices,as determined by each affected local agency,to minimize any traffic and pedestrian hazards that exist during project construction. Mitigation Measure 3.12-te: Public roadways will be restored to their existing Condition after project construction is completed. Mitigation Measure 3.12-1f: The Sanitation District will attempt to schedule construction of relief facilities to occur jointly with other public works projects already planned in the affected locations,through careful coordination with all local agencies involved. Mitigation Measure 3.12.1g: Emergency service purveyors will be contacted and consulted to preclude the creation of unnecessary traffic bottlenecks that will seriously impede response times.Additionally,measures to provide an adequate level of access to private properties will be maintained to allow delivery of emergency services. Mitigation Measure 3.12.1 h: Orange County Transportation Authority(OCTA)will be contacted when construction affects roadways that are part of the OCTA bus transit network.Adequate procedures will be implemented to keep bus routes and station accessible to users. Mitigation Measure 3.12-11: Construction traffic,mainly trucks,will be routed in a way to minimize impacts to sensitive neighborhoods. In addition,storage and staging of materials and equipment will be done after obtaining a Temporary Use Permit,when needed. Mitigation Measure 3.12-1j: An effort will be made to solicit input from residents in the neighborhoods of the proposed improvements.These inputs will be considered in the planning phase through construction to mitigate the residents'concerns. Mitigation Measure 3.12.1 k: For sewer improvements that occur within railroad rights-of-way,the Sanitation District will follow the Southern California Regional Rail Authority(SCRRA)procedures for right-of-way encroachment—SCRRA Form No.36.The procedures for temporary encroachment calls for:(1)the submittal of a written statement of the reason and location of the encroachment; (2)a completed and executed SCRRA Form No.6, Right-of-Entry Agreement; (3)plan check, inspection,and flagging fees;and(4)insurance certificates,as described in the Right-of-Entry Agreement. Per SCRRA Form No.6,the Sanitation District must comply with the rules and regulations of this agreement at all times when working on SCRRA property, including those outlines in the "Rules and Requirements for Construction at Railway Property, SCRRA Form No.37"and"General Safety Regulations for Construction/Maintenance Activity on Railway Property." WBDI21pWS�MDP©a 37, S 1500003 18 TABLE A-1 Mbpation IvbndormA and Reporting Proemanforthe Collection Syslemi provement Plan Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Contract with qualified traffic control engineer to Maintain copy of traffic control plan for Sanitation District During Design. prepare traffic control plan for each construction administrative record. project. 2. Ensure that issues identified in mitigation Maintain copy of traffic control plan for Sanitation District During Design. measures are included in traffic control plan. administrative record. 3. Include within construction contract Maintain record of contract specifications for Sanitation District,Caltrans, Prior to Approval of Plans specifications the acquisition of all necessary administrative record. Maintain permits for the RDMD, OCTA, Local Jurisdictions and Specifications. encroachment permits. administrative record. 4. Conduct periodic construction site inspections. Maintain record of site inspections. Sanitation District,Caltrans, During Construction. RDMD, OCTA, Local Jurisdictions S. Include application for SCRRA encroachment Maintain record of contract specifications for Sanitation District, SCRRA Prior to Approval of Plans permit in construction contract specifications. administrative record. Maintain permits for the and Specifications. administrative record. Impact 3.12-2: Construction of collection system improvement projects would include lane closures and limited road closures that would worsen level of service(LOS) along local roadways. Significant Unavoidable. Mitigation Measure 3.12.2a: Where lane closures are necessary for construction of sewer improvement projects,all construction equipment will be staged within the closed lanes or in staging areas outside of city streets. Mitigation Measure 3.12-2b: Where lane or road closures are necessary for construction of sewer improvement projects,adequate signage will be provided informing local residents and business owners of construction activities prior to commencement of construction activities. Mitigation Measure 3.12-2c: Where lane or road closures are necessary for construction of sewer improvement projects,cones and/or traffic guards will be used to clearly indicate the locations and directions of temporarily altered traffic lanes. Mitigation Measure 3.12.2d: The construction technique for implementation of the proposed sewer lines,such as tunneling,cut-and-cover with partial street closure,or cut-and-cover with full street closure,will include consideration of the ability of the roadway system, both the street in question and alternate routes,to carry existing traffic volumes during project construction. If necessary,adjacent parallel streets will be selected as alternate alignments for the proposed sewer improvements.As required by local jurisdictions,trunk sewers will be jacked under select major intersections to avoid traffic disruption and congestion. Mitigation Measure 3.12-2e: Public streets generally will be kept operational during construction,particularly in the morning and evening peak hours of traffic. Lane closures will be minimized during peak traffic hours. Mitigation Measure 3.12-2f: Where mad closures are necessary for construction of sewer improvement projects,signage will be posted informing motorists of road closures and delineating suitable detours, both prior to and during the duration of construction activities. Prior to initiating a road closure,coordination with local jurisdictions, including Caltrans,will occur. WBDI21 VIS�MDP©RWL37, S 15W3 19 TABLE A-1 Mbgation Mmtomag and Reporting Propam forthe Collection System trrprovemnt Plan Implementation Procedure Actions Responsibility Schedule 1. Include adherence to the traffic Maintain traffic control plan,permits, Sanitation District Prior to Approval of Plans and control plan in construction contract and construction schedule and Specifications. specifications. methods for administrative record. 2. Include coordination with local Maintain traffic control plan,permits, Sanitation District, Local Jurisdictions Prior to Approval of Plans and jurisdictions,signage and notification and construction schedule and Specifications. in construction contract specifications. methods for administrative record. 3. Conduct periodic construction site Maintain record of site inspections. Sanitation District, Local Jurisdictions During Construction. inspections. WWIXOWSCUTbRPMDP©R 37, S 15%00 20 Appendix B - Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 1136054A Page intentionally blank. 1136054.1 ADDENDUM TO FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT COLLECTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PLAN ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT(MARCH 2O07) SCH#2006101018 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF PROJECT (PROJECT NO. 6-17) AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description OCSD's District 6 Tmnk is located in coastal Orange County and collects flow from the southern portion of the City of Costa Mesa,as well as small portions of the City of Newport Beach.The 3,700 foot sewer ranges from 12-I8 inches and begins in Pomona Ave just south of West 16th St in the City of Costa Mesa;it runs mostly through casements in an industrial area with much of the middle and lower portions of the trunk running along Newport Blvd. within the City of Newport Beach. The sewer ultimately discharges into sewer along Pacific Coast Highway,where the flow is eventually conveyed to the Bitter Point Pump Station. The District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Proj ect was identified in the 2006 Strategic Plan Update as requiring updates.Based on current flow projections and hydraulic modeling,this project is needed to reduce the potential for surcharging and sewer spills due to projected increase in flow from planned developments and growth. Investigations also revealed that segments initially identified as not being up-sized,require rehabilitation and maintenance access improvements as well.Approximately two-thirds of a mile will be improved as part of this project. The sewer will be rehabilitated using a variety of methods including pipe bursting, open-cut pipe replacement/realignment,and cured-in-place relining.Several maintenance access points will also be reconstructed or relocated.Access improvements involving surface modifications will be done to improve safety and reduce risk when accessing the pipe for maintenance. 1.2 Purpose and Scope The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires public agencies to analyze and consider the environmental consequences of their decisions to approve development projects over which they exercise discretion. As lead agency, the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) prepared a Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR)for the OCSD Collection System Improvement Plan in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, section 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations,Section 15000 et seq.,as amended).The District 6 Project was one of 19 collection system improvement projects analyzed in the PEIR. The Project is therefore a subsequent activity within the scope of the PEIR(CEQA Guidelines§15168). Subsequent activities in a PEIR must be examined in light of the PEIR to determine whether an additional environmental document must be prepared(CEQA Guidelines§15168(c)). During the design phase of the District 6 Project, minor changes to the project description were identified. An Addendum to a previously certified EIR is appropriate if some changes,additions,or clarifications are necessary,but no substantial new information or substantial changes to the project or circumstances would require major revisions to the previous EIR(CEQA Guidelines§15162). In reviewing the Project details,OCSD staff identified two topics that merit further evaluation:(1)short-term,project- specific air quality impacts;and(2)greenhouse gas(GHG)emissions impacts.After reviewing the facts and analyzing l March 2015 the circumstances,OCSD staff has determined that none of the circumstances described in CEQA Guidelines§15162 have occurred as related to air quality and GHGs. 2.0 AIR QUALITY The OCSD Collection System Improvement Plan PEIR described the existing air quality regarding the following regulated pollutants:ozone(03),carbon monoxide(CO),suspended particulate matter(PMlo),nitrogen oxides(NOx), sulfur dioxide(SO2),lead,and reactive organic gases(ROG).The project site is located in the Orange County portion of the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). Table 2-1 shows the pollutants and associated attainment status for SCAB. Orange County is designated as a federal and state non-attainment area for 03,and PM2.5,maintenance for CO,and an attainment area for SOt,NOt,PMho and lead. 2.1 Regulatory Setting The South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)is the regional agency responsible for the regulation and enforcement of Federal, State, and local air pollution control regulations in the SCAB. The SCAQMD has the responsibility of ensuring that Federal and State ambient air quality standards are achieved,maintained,and enforced in the SCAB. SCAQMD rules and regulations require that any equipment that emits or controls air contaminants be permitted prior to construction,installation,or operation(Permit to Construct or Permit to Operate).The SCAQMD also has visible emissions, nuisance, and fugitive dust regulations which are applicable to the Project during construction activities. These specific regulations include SCAQMD Rule 401 (Visible Emissions);SCAQMD Rule 402 (Nuisance); and SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust).The intent of these rules is to limit the amount of visible emissions and fugitive dust generated from emission sources and to ensure emitted pollutants do not cause a public nuisance. SCAQMD Rule 403 provides control measures to reduce overall fugitive dust emissions from construction activities. Based on the description of the construction activities for the Project, the amount of soil to be excavated, and the acreage of the disturbed areas,the Project does not classify as a`large operation."However,to minimize fugitive dust emissions,feasible fugitive dust control measures as stated in the applicable rules would be implemented as Applicant Proposed Measures (APMs) to reduce potential impacts to off-site receptors (SCAQMD, 2009a). In addition, Mitigation Measure 3.2-2 in the PEIR also addresses fugitive dust emissions. 2.2 Methodology Criteria pollutants and GHG emissions associated with the short term operation of off-road construction equipment, on-road mobile equipment,and fugitive dust dispersion,were quantified using the latest California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod)Version 2013.2.2. CaIEEMod applies the latest approved emission factors,methodologies, and latest survey data when tabulating results. The model inputs were tailored to reflect Project/site specific data for a more accurate analysis.The model was run to produce both the daily max and annual average for criteria pollutants, as well as total annual GHG emissions. 2.3 Significance of Impacts Air quality impacts during construction of the Project are presented in Table 2-1 below. Peak daily construction emissions are summarized and are also compared to the established SCAQMD regional mass daily emission thresholds and localized significance thresholds(LSTs)for construction. 2 March 2015 DailyTable 2-1: Peak Criteria Pollutants, lb/day ROG CO NOX SOX PM10 PM2.5 Regional Impact Evaluation Total Daily Emissions 6.53 41.28 58.29 0.06 15.28 9.45 Regional Thresholds 75 550 100 150 150 55 Exceed Regional Thresholds(Yes/No)? No No No No No No Localized Impact Evaluation Total Daily Offsite Emission 0 0 0 0 0.9 0.047 Localized Significance Thresholds - 647 92 - 4 3 Exceed LST(Yes/No)? No No No No No No 2.4 Application of CEQA Thresholds Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation ofthe applicable air quality plan? An emissions in the SCAB are regulated by the SCAQMD. Pursuant to the federal Clean Air Act (CAA), the SCAQMD is required to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for which the SCAB is in non-attainment. Strategies to achieve these emission reductions are developed in SCAQMD's Air Quality Management Plan(AQMP) for the region. Chapter 3 of the AQMP states,"future emissions forecasts are based on demographic and economic growth projections provided by the Southern California Association of Governments(SCAG)." The Project will not conflict with or obstruct implementation of any applicable air quality plans or regulations. The regions currently exceeds standards for ozone and PM2.5,the most significant sources of these pollutants are vehicle and other mobile source emissions.No new impacts associated with the implementation of an air quality plan would occur. Would the project violate any air quality standard or contribute.substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? The South Coast region is currently in non-attainment with air quality standards for ozone and PM2.5.The Project is not expected to result in significantly increased air emissions.Based on this air quality analysis,potential emissions from truck traffic associated with this project would represent insignificant sources of pollutants contributing to the overall PM,,emissions.Nonetheless,because the South Coast Air Basin is a nonattainment area for ozone and PM2s, applicable air quality mitigation measures included in the PEIR should be employed to minimize particulate emissions during rehabilitation operations.No new impacts associated with the violation of air quality standards would occur. Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-affainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard(including releasing emissions,which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? In evaluating the activities described in the certified PEIR,OCSD had concluded that short-term cumulative impacts related 0 air quality would remain significant after mitigation. When combined with construction of the reasonably foreseeable future projects,construction emissions are anticipated to exceed significance thresholds for NO,.Because air emissions typically are considered on a regional basis,any project being constructed in the general vicinity of the proposed collection system improvement projects during the same construction timeframc likely would contribute to potentially significant cumulative air quality impacts.However,Mitigation Measures from the PEIR applicable to air quality will be incorporated into the Project. No new impacts associated with a cumulative net increase of criteria pollutants would occur. 3 March 2015 Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Sensitive receptors in the Project area include a library, park three places of worship, a hospital, senior living community, and a school.As stated in the PEIR,the temporary increase in emissions of criteria air pollutants during construction would not be expected to exceed SCAQMD-established air quality thresholds for the Project.Emissions associated with operational activities would be minimal and are not anticipated to result in long-term operational impacts that conflict with SCAQMD-established air quality standards. Therefore, the Project would not have a significant impact to sensitive receptors during construction or operation. Would the project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number ofpeople? The Project would be expected to create some objectionable odors as a result of modification of the existing sewer lines.Currently,OCSD investigates and tracks all odor complaints,performing cleaning and/or repairs as appropriate, and would continue this practice. As part of its operational activity, OCSD injects sodium hydroxide, hydrogen peroxide, ferrous chloride, and magnesium hydroxide at various locations in the collection system to control odor. Construction contractors are required to follow a site-specific odor control plan to minimize odors during rehabilitation activities. Odor control could include monitoring, ventilating, chemical application, material containment limiting atmospheric exposure,and activity staging to minimize odor impacts. Therefore,impacts associated with the creation of objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people would be considered less than significant. 3.0 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS The certified PEIR did not contain a greenhouse gas(GHG)emissions analysis,as it was not industry practice in 2007 to routinely perform such an analysis.Since that time,however,analysis of GHG's is now required and new checklist questions were approved for inclusion in the CEQA Guidelines as of March 18,2010.Therefore,GHG emissions are now considered in the environmental analysis for the Project.This analysis is undertaken to determine if the Project would result in adverse impacts in relation to GHG emissions. Global climate change refers to changes in average climatic conditions on Earth as a whole, including temperature, wind patterns,precipitation and storms.Global temperatures are moderated by naturally occurring atmospheric gases, including water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N20). These gases allow solar radiation(sunlight)into the Earth's atmosphere,but prevent radiative heat from escaping,thus warming the Earth's atmosphere. Global climate change attributable to the emission of GHGs(mainly CO2,CH4 and N20)generated by human activity is currently one of the most important and widely debated scientific,economic and political issues in the United States. Historical records indicate that global climate changes have occurred in the past due to natural phenomena(such as during previous ice ages). Some data indicate that the current global conditions differ from past climate changes in rate and magnitude.These data have led political leaders to take actions designed to reduce GHG emissions generated by human activity. Carbon dioxide is the most abundant GHG. GHGs are the result of both natural and human activity. Forest fires, decomposition, industrial processes, landfills, and consumption of fossil fuels for power generation, transportation, heating, and cooking are the primary sources of GHG emissions. According to the California Energy Commission (CEC), emissions from fossil fuel consumption represent approximately 81 percent of GHG emissions and transportation creates 41 percent of GHG emissions in California. The scientific understanding of the fundamental processes responsible for global climate change has improved over the past decade, and predictive capabilities are advancing. However, there remain significant uncertainties, for example,in predictions of local effects of climate change,occurrence of extreme weather events,effects of aerosols, changes in clouds,shifts in the intensity and distribution of precipitation,and changes in oceanic circulation. Due to the complexity of the Earth's climate system,the uncertainty surrounding climate change may never be completely eliminated. Because of these uncertainties, there continues to be significant debate with respect to the appropriate actions to limit and/or respond to climate change. In addition, it is impossible to link a single development project with future specific climate change impacts. 4 March 2015 3.1 Regulatory Setting 3.1.1 FEDERAL.PLANS,POLICIES,REGULATIONS,AND LAWS The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) is the Federal agency responsible for implementing the Federal Clean Air Act(CAA).The Supreme Court of the United States ruled on April 2,2007 that CO2 is an air pollutant as defined under the CAA,and that EPA has the authority to regulate emissions of GHGs.However,there are no Federal regulations or policies regarding GHG emissions that are directly applicable to the Project or that require additional analysis for compliance with the regulations listed below. 3.1.2 STATE PLANS,POLICIES,REGULATIONS,AND LAWS The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is the agency responsible for coordination and oversight of state and local air pollution control programs.Various statewide and local initiatives to reduce the state's contribution to GHG emissions have raised awareness that, even though the various contributors to, and consequences of, global climate change are not yet fully understood,global climate change is under way,and there is a real potential for severe,adverse environmental,social,and economic effects in the long term. Assembly Bill 1493 In 2002,then-Governor Gray Davis signed AB 1493,which required that ARB develop and adopt,by January 1,2005, regulations that achieve `the maximum feasible reduction of GHGs emitted by passenger vehicles and light-duty trucks and other vehicles determined by ARB to be vehicles whose primary use is noncommercial personal transportation in the state." To meet the requirements of AB 1493, in 2004 ARB approved amendments to the California Code of Regulations(CCR)adding GHG emissions standards to California's existing standards for motor vehicle emissions.These amendments require automobile manufacturers to meet fleet-average GHG emissions limits for all passenger cars, light-duty trucks within various weight criteria, and medium-duty passenger vehicle weight classes (i.e., any medium-duty vehicle with a gross vehicle weight (GV W) rating less than 10,000 pounds that is designed primarily for the transportation of persons), begaining with the 2009 model year. For passenger cars and light-duty trucks with a loaded vehicle weight(LV W)of 3,750 pounds or less,the GHG emission limits for the 2016 model year are approximately 37 percent lower than the limits for the first year of the regulations, the 2009 model year. For light-duty trucks with LV W of 3,751 pounds to GV W of 8,500 pounds, as well as medium-duty passenger vehicles, GHG emissions will be reduced approximately 24 percent between 2009 and 2016. On January 24, 2011, the U.S.Department of Transportation(DOT),the EPA and the state of California announced a single fimeframe for proposing fuel economy and greenhouse gas standards for model year 2017-2025 cars and light-duty trucks. The standards require these vehicles to meet an estimated combined average emissions level of 250 grams of carbon dioxide per mile in model year 2016,which is equivalent to 35.5 miles per gallon. Executive Order 5-3-05 In 2005, in recognition of California's vulnerability to the effects of climate change, Governor Schwarzenegger established Executive Order 5-3-05,which sets forth a series of target dates by which statewide emission of GHGs would be progressively reduced,as follows:by 2010,reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels;by 2020,reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels;and by 2050,reduce GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels. Assembly Bill 32 In September 2006,Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed AB 32,the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.AB 32 establishes regulatory,reporting,and market mechanisms to achieve quantifiable reductions in GHG emissions and a cap on statewide GHG emissions.AB 32 requires that statewide GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020. In December 2007,ARB approved the 2020 emission limit(1990 level) of 427 million metric tons (MMT) COse. The goal requires that California reduce CO2e emissions by 169 million metric tons (MMT), or approximately 30%,from the state's projected 2020 emissions level of 596 MMT of CO2e under a business-as-usual scenario. 5 March 2015 Executive Order S-1-07 Executive Order S-1-07,which was signed by Governor Schwarzenegger in 2007,proclaims that the transportation sector is the main source of GHG emissions in California,at over 40 percent of statewide emissions. It establishes a goal that the carbon intensity of transportation fuels sold in California should be reduced by a minimum of 10 percent by 2020.This order also directed ARB to determine if this Low Carbon Fuel Standard could be adopted as a discrete, early-action measure after meeting the mandates in AB 32.ARB adopted the Low Carbon Fuel Standard on April 23, 2009. Senate Bill 97 SB 97, signed August 2007, acknowledges that climate change is a prominent environmental issue that requires analysis under CEQA.This bill directs the California Office of Planning and Research(OPR)to prepare,develop,and transmit to the Resources Agency guidelines for the feasible mitigation of GHG emissions or the effects of GHG emissions,as required by CEQA by July 1,2009.The California Natural Resources Agency is required to certify or adopt those guidelines by January 1, 2010. On April 13, 2009, the California Office of Planning and Research submitted to the Secretary for Natural Resources its proposed amendments to the state CEQA Guidelines for GHG emissions,as required by SB 97.On December 30,2009,the Natural Resources Agency adopted the proposed CEQA Guidelines amendments,as required by SB 97.The amendments became effective March 18,2010. 3.L3 REGIONAL AND LOCAL PLANS,POLICIES,REGULATIONS,AND LAWS The SCAQMD monitors an quality within the project area and SCAB,which includes Orange County and portions of Los Angeles,Riverside,and San Bernardino counties. SCAB is bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west;the San Gabriel,San Bernardino and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east;and the San Diego County line to the south. The SCAQMD also has jurisdiction over the Salton Sea Air Basin and a portion of the Mojave Desert in Riverside County. SCAQMD has not adopted any rules or regulations specific to global climate change or GHG emissions that are applicable to the Project. 3.2 Methodology GHG emissions generated by the Project would predominantly be in the form of carbon dioxide (CO2) and would occur primarily due to combustion sources including construction equipment and on-and off-road vehicle hips. GHG emissions from construction equipment were quantified using spreadsheets populated with horsepower-based composite emission factors, with built-in load factors. The emission factors were obtained from the SCAQMD's website(SCAQMD 2011)and represent the fleet-wide average emission factors during 2014 within the SCAB. GHG emissions from on-road motor vehicles were estimated using CARB's On-Road EMFAC201 I mobile source emission factors,obtained from the EMFAC2011 model output. 3.3 Significance of Impacts The previously certified PEIR did not contain an analysis of global climate change and GHG emissions.As mentioned earlier, amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines for climate change analyses became effective in March 2010. Therefore, climate change analyses were not necessarily required or included in environmental documents prior to this time. Nonetheless, in order to fully analyze and disclose the Project's potential environmental consequences, OCSD has analyzed the Project's potential GHG emission impacts using State approved models. There are currently two interim significance thresholds for GHG emissions, established by SCAQMD and CARB. The SCAQMD adopted an interim threshold of 10,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year(MTCOse/yr) for industrial projects, including both stationary and mobile source-related emissions (with construction impacts amortized over a 30-year period,plus operational impacts). The CARB interim threshold,which has been proposed but not yet been adopted, is 7,000 MTCOze/yr for non-transportation GHG emission sources, and includes interim performance standard requirements for construction equipment(which have yet to be defined). The SCAQMD interim threshold for industrial projects has been used for this analysis because it applies to mobile source emissions,which is the emission source for the Project construction activities. The analysis quantifies the annual GHG emissions that will result from project-related mobile sources during construction,and compares them to SCAQMD's Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources (SCAQMD 2008).As presented in Table 3-1,GHG emissions generated during construction would increase as a result 6 March 2015 of the proposed activities described above. However,the incremental increase would be less than 4.58 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year(MTCO2e/yr)and therefore would be less than significant. SCAQMDTable 3-1: Project GHG Emissions and CO2e Emissions Total Project CO2.Emissions During Construction, MTCO2e/Project 137.27 Amortized Construction GHG(over a 30-year period), MTCO2e130-yr 4.58 SCAQMD Interim GHG Threshold for Industrial Projects 10,000 Would the project exceed the SCAQMD interim threshold?(Yes/No) No Notes: 1. Detailed emission calculations are presented in Attachment 1. Source: Modeled by Rands AbuShaban, 2015 3.4 Application of CEQA Guidelines Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Implementation ofthe Project would generate GHGs through the construction and routine maintenance ofthe Project. GHG emissions from the Project would specifically arise from the temporary direct sources, such as motor vehicles and construction related diesel equipment.Emissions from these sources were estimated using the Ca1EEMOd model based on default emission factors and land use consumption and generation rates. Emissions of greenhouse gases are presented in terms of metric tons of CO2 equivalents (MTCO2e). CO2e is the combination of all greenhouse gas impacts when normalized by comparing the effects of the impacts of each individual gas to that of a reference gas (CO2).This metric allows for the representation of greenhouse gas impacts as a single number. Table 3-1 shows the estimated GHG emissions with respect to the Project.It should be noted that the mitigation measures identified in the certified Air Quality section of the PEIR serve to reduce fugitive dust pollutants and would not reduce GHG emissions. As such, the GHG emissions identified in Table 3-1 reflect the estimated emissions without the incorporation of mitigation identified in the certified PEIR. Based on these calculations, construction of the Project would result in emissions of 137.27 MT CO2e/year and, therefore, would be below the SCAQMD's screening-level threshold. The impact of the Project would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Would the project conflict with any applicable plan,policy,or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions ofgmenhouse gases? The County Board of Supervisors adopted a countywide energy and environmental policy (Policy No. 3.045) to provide guidelines for development, implementation, and enhancement of energy conservation and environmental programs within the County.AB 32 established the goal of reducing GHG emissions in California to 1990 levels by 2020.The proposed SCAQMD screening-level thresholds are designed such that a 90 percent capture rate is achieved. This 90 percent capture rate means that 90 percent of all development projects would need to incorporate some form of emission reductions in order to reduce emissions. These rates are established to be compliant with the AB 32 threshold of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. The Project's GHG emissions would be below the SCAQMD's screening-level threshold,and thus would not conflict with AB 32 and Policy No.3.045.Because the Project is compliant with the SCAQMD screening threshold and would comply with all regulatory requirements related to GHG emissions,the Project would not conflict with plans,policies, or regulations adopted to reduce GHG emissions. The impact of the Project would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. 7 March 2015 4.0 REFERENCES Orange County Sanitation District,March,2007. Program Environmental Impact Report, Collection System Improvement Plan. Prepared by Integrated Program Management Systems(IPMS) 8 March 2015 ATTACHMENT Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Model Outputs 9 March 2015 Page intentionally blank. 10 March 2015 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM OCSD Proj.No. 6-17 South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(mis) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 31 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2016 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 630.89 CH4 Intensity 0,029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (IbIMWhr) (IbIMWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics- Land Use- Construction Phase-Total days of construction are based on anticipated working days. Off-road Equipment-Construction units anticipated for this phase of the project. Off-road Equipment- Off-road Equipment-Construction units anticipated for this construction phase. Off-road Equipment- No mortar mixers are planned to be used on this project. Off-road Equipment- Planned construction units for this phase. Trips and VMT- Based on projected information. Demolition- Grading -Unknown value. CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 0.00 12.00 ...........................................................}-"-'-""-'-""-'-"-'-"-'4.......................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 0.00 121.00 .............................i-----------------------------}_____________________________-.......................... tblConstructionPhase i 0.00 25.00 ...........................................................}-""-'-"-'-""-""-'-"-'4.......................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 0.00 6.00 .............................4..............................�._____________________________4.......................... lblGratling AcrosOfGrading i 60.50 2.50 ......................................---------------------+-"-----"---------------"-- .......................... 1blGrading AcresOfGrading i 0.00 3.00 .............................i..............................F_____________________________a.......................... lblGratling MaterialEzporletl i 0.00 1,910.00 ..............................--------------------------------------"-'-"-'-'-"-'-"-'4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment OflRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 4.00 0.00 -------......................4-----------------------------.F_____________________________4-------------------------- lbIOlfRoadEquipment Of oadEquipmenlUnMmount i 1.00 0.00 ..............................-----------------------------------------------------------4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1,00 0.00 .............................4-----------------------------.F_____________________________4-------------------------- lbIOlfRoadEquipment Of oadEquipmenlUnib ount i 2.00 0.00 ..............................-----------------------------------------------------------4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 .............................4-----------------------------.F_____________________________4-------------------------- lbIOlfRoadEquipment Of oadEquipmenlUnMmount i 2.00 1.00 ..............................-----------------------------------------------------------4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 2.00 1.00 .............................4-----------------------------.F_____________________________4-------------------------- lbIOlfRoadEquipment UsageHours i 6.00 0.00 ..............................-----------------------------------------------------------4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment UsageHours i 8.00 0.00 .............................4-----------------------------.F_____________________________4-------------------------- lbIOlfRoadEquipment UsageHours i 4.00 8.00 ..............................-----------------------------------------------------------4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment UsageHours i 6.00 8.00 .............................4-----------------------------.F_____________________________4-------------------------- lbIOlfRoadEquipment UsageHours i 8.00 0.00 ..............................-----------------------------------------------------------4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment UsageHours i 7.00 8.00 .............................4-----------------------------.F_____________________________4-------------------------- lbIOlfRoadEquipment UsageHours i 7.00 8.00 ..............................-----------------------------------------------------------4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment UsageHours i 1,00 8.00 .............................4-----------------------------.F_____________________________4-------------------------- lbIOlfRoadEquipment UsageHours i 6.00 8.00 ..............................-----------------------------------------------------------4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment UsageHours i 7.00 8.00 .............................4-----------------------------4------------------------------4.......................... tblProjectCharacteristics Opere6onalVear 2014 2016 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG I NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBic-0O2 Totdl G02 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM25 PM2.5 Total Year IWtley IWEay 2015 2s954 j 28.6870 j 18.3827 j 0,0183 j 6.1235 1.5510 j L6745 j 3.3320 1.4269 4]588 • i 11,918.485 j 0.5728 1 0.0000 11,930.513 4 1 a_______a_______a_______a-------a-------a-------a-------a------------------------------a_ __ _a__ a_______....... 20.1 38380 29.6041 2 .8949 0.0378 8.1235 2.0018 ]802] 3.3320 2.OK3 46928 _15.10] 0.5]2_ j 0.0000 3,627.121 9 I 0 11 Tend6.3313 1 58.2911 1 41.2]]6 1 0.0558 1 122410 1 3.6320 1 15.2iT1 1 fi.fi639 1 3.4112 1 9,1516 • 1 15,533.8931 1.1440 0.0000 15,551.634 3 2 Mitigated Construction ROG IN x CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Errand Pli Nei NBio-002 TOtaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year IWtley IWtley 2015 •I 2.6954 1 28.6870 18.3827 1 0,0183 1 6.1235 1.5510 1 TENS 1 3.3320 i 1.4269 43588 • 11,918.485: 0.5728 i 0.0000 1 1,930.513 I 1 I I 1 1 I 4 I 1 '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • ' d l 201fi 3.03fi0 1 29.6041 1 22.0949 1 0.03]6 1 fi.1235 1 2.0010 1 ].fi02] 1 3.3320 20443 4.fi928 • 3,fi15.10] 0.5]21 0.0000 3,627.121 i i i i i i i i 0 i i I 0 Total 6.5313 158.2911 41.2]]8 0.0558 12.2470 3.6328 15.2]fl 8.8639 3.4712 9.4516 5,511.591 1.1440 0.0000 15,551.B,t4 1 2 ROG Ni CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Bio-0O2 Naio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM o Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Tohl Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG I NO. CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust I PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 BIo-COF NBic-0O2 T.Wi CO2 CH4 N20 002e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Wday Wday Area I 0.0000 00000 ; 0.0000 ; 00000 ; 0.0000 ; 00000 ; 00000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Operational ROG NO. CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 T.taIGO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 TMaI PM2.5 PM2.5 TMaI Category Wday Wday Area •I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i i i i I Total 0.0000 0.0000 O.000o 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 ROG Nos CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 I BIo-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PMio Total PM2.5 P1112.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 :Site Preparation )Site Preparation 110112/2015 :10119/2015 5; 6;Mticipated working days .._....s..................... .f.--------------------- ------------4------------a--------a--------1-----._..........._.------------- :Grading lGrading 110120MO15 14/5/2016 5: 121 Mbdpaled working days i 3 :Building Construction i...... .....Construction 14/6Y2018 :4Y21/2018 5; --4M 1pated working days .._....s........................4..........._.......... _--_____+_____--+-______5: 25: .didp ._.... ing day._...... 4 •Paving :Paying •4/22I2016 •5/26/2016 5• 25•Mticipaletl woticing days Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 3 Acres of Grading(Grading Phase): 2.5 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating -sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM Phase Name Oflroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation lGreders 0 0.00l 174; 0.41 .......r'a'tion.................J...._......_...._......_....___________ � ____________4...._......... Site Prepara rTractors/Loaders/Rackhoes 1� 8.00� 97' 0.37............. ...................................... ____---___}____________:............. . .............. Grading I.Concrete Saws , 0� 0.001 81; 0.73 ............................I...........................___________�____________� 4....-------------- Gratling I , 1� 8.00� 174; 0.41 ............................:..... ...._...._._.._._....___________}____________:_____________4....------------- - -------------- Grading I.Rubberubber Tired Dozers , 1 8.001 255:--4 0.40 ............................t...._......_...._._.._._.... 1 ___________4...._......... Gratling ITractorslLoatlerslBackhoes 1� 8.00� 97• 0.37 .....................................ress __________}____________:____________. . ........... 4...._......... Building Construction jAlr Compressors , 2� 8.00� 78; 0.48 ......'cns'l ................I...._......_...._._.._._.... � ____________4...._......... Builtling Cons[mction rCranes 0� 8.00� 226' 0.29 Building Construction jDumpererTendere , 2 8.00� 16; 0.38 ............................I...._......_...._._.._._....___________ � ____________4...._......... Builtling Construction rEzcavatom 1� 8.00� 162' 0.38 ........ nt Building Cosmction �Forkli fl s , 0 B.00j 89; 0.20 .......... ................I...._......_...._._.._._...._________.._.. ____________4-------------- Builtling Constm..ction rGenemtor Sets 1 84' 0.74 .......................� .}_.__________:_____________4...._......... BUIldl; Construction Pumpa , 8.001 84; 0.74 ............................ ...........................___________ ___________I ____________4...._......... Builtling Constmction rTrachus i-oaders/Rackhoes 1� 8.00I 97' 0.37 ............... _.._._...�__________}____________:_____________4...._......... Paving ICementand Mona. ..ere , 0� 0.001 9; 0.66 ............................j..._......_...._......_....___________ ___________I ____________4...._......... Paving A..... 1� 8.00I --- 0.42 , .......................�----------}------------------------__4----------- ... Paving IRollera , - 8.00� 80; 0.38 ............................:..._ s/Load _...._._.._._.._._________________ _._.____._._r_____________4-------------- Paving •TractorslLoatlerslBackhoes 1• 8.00' 97 0.37 Trios and VMT Phase Name Oflroad Equipment I Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Tnp Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Site Preparation i 1; 3.00: 0.00; 14.70; 6.90; t—_— __________ _________�—.._..i _ :__________4--------------------_-------------1----------i---------- Grading 3; 8.00 239.00, 14.70- 6.90; ................4______________s--.._..{__________1_________.__________4............ ......... ... ............ 1__________t.......... Building Construction i 9; 0.00: O.M. 14.70; 6.90; Paving • r _4 • _ _a- t r _♦ 3• 8.00• 0.00: 14.70• 6.90• CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Site Preparation -2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PMIO Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-0O2 TotaICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total ME PM2.5 Total Category IWd, IWday Fu9ilive Dust _•aI_______ 0_.5_3_03_ 0_.0_0_00_ 03_03 0_.0_5_73_ 0_.0_0_00 _0_0573 0.0000 _0_0_0_0_0 --------------- _______I 0.30 I3.421 2.4258 3.1200e- 0.2888 0286 0.2472 _02472 32].48 _I 0.09]8 1329.5408 003 I I Total 0.3804 I 3.4WH I 2,4256 13.1200e- I 0.5303 0.2686 I 0.7989 I 0.0573 0.2472 0.30" • 1327ABT] 0.078 I 329.5408 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 FugiOve Exhaust PM25 Bo-CO2 NBh CO2 ToWICO2 cm N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Iblday Iblday Haug, •I I 0.0000 0.0000 I Ouam ; 0.0000 0.0000 ; 00000 I ; 0.0000 0.0000 • I I I I I I I i I ...........• __ _ _��_ ____a_ __ _.a. _ ___a..�__ -------a__-_0__--- 00s ....... o.0000 ; o.0000 ; o.0000 ; o.0000 ; o.0000 o. x,0000 - ; o.0000 ; ; � o.0000 •I I I I I I I � I I I I I I I Worker I 0.0292 0.0000 0.0292 ].1800e- 0.0000 ].i800e- • I 0.0000 0.0000 i 003 003 Total I 0.0292 I 0.0000 I 0.0222 17.1601 0.0000 7.1601 • I 0.0000 I 0.0000 11 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM 3.2 Site Preparation -2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 TolaICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total Pli PM2.5 TWaI Category IWday Iblday Fugitive Oust I I 05303 0.0000 I 05303 I 00573 0.0000 ; 00573 • I 00000 0.0000 'I I I • I ____ ___ _ 1I I I I-------xI ------- ----------- i _ ____ I I-Road •I0.3804 , 3.42_ 2.4258 13.1200e- 0 _ _ 28 472 327. 09I 329.5408 I I 003 I Total 0.3604 3.4321 I 2.4256 13.1200e- 01113 0.2686 I 0]989 I 0.0573 0.2472 1 0.30" • I32].40T] 0.0970 I 329.51 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Iblday Wday Haulilg I O.W00 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 •I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I a a a a a a �---------------i 1 1 I •I a a.a000 � 0.0009 � o.o9ao � 9.gaoo o.0000 o.99ao � 9.gaoo � � � o.9aao •I I I I I I I I I •I i I I I I I I : ; I -----------•I __------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-----------____ Worker ; j j j 0.0292 j 0.0000 j 0.0292 j 7.1600e- j 0.0000 ; 7.1600e- I 0.0000 j 0.0000 I i i i i i i 003 i 003 Total 0.0292 0.0000 0.0292 7.1600e- 0.0000 7.1600.- • 0.0m I 0.0000 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM 3.3 Grading - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 TolaICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total Pli PM2.5 TWaI Category IWday Iblday Fugitive Oust I I 60458 0,0000 I 6.0458 I 33129 0.0000 ; 33129 • I 00000 0.0000 I I i I I i I 'I I I I • I •I I I I I I ------a ______, _ 1 _____,_______ _ -------x-------s-------_--- ---- _______I_______I _ I-------.I --------------- -Road 2.695t _ 86 __ _1__30_2_]_'__018 I _ 51__ 11,918.4851 0.5720 1,930.513 1,1269 I Total 2.6954 28.6870 118.382T I 0.0183 I Chi I 1.5510 I 7.067 I 3.3129 1.4269 1 4.7397 • 11,918A05 0.5]28 I 1,930.513 0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Iblday Wday Haulilg I O.W00 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 •I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I a a a a a a �---------------i 1 1 I •I a a.a000 � 0.0009 � o.o9ao � 9.gaoo o.0000 o.99ao � 9.gaoo � � � o.9aao •I I I I I I I I I •I i I I I I I I : ; I ...........•I __------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-----------....I Worker ; j j j O.OTI] j 0.0000 j 0.0]T] j 0.0191 j 0.0000 ; 0.01991 j 0.0000 i j � 0.0000 I i i i i i i i i I i I Total CAM 0.0000 0.07T 0.0191 0.0000 0.0191 • 0.0000 I 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM 3.3 Grading - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 TolaICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total Pli PM2.5 TWaI Category IWday Iblday Fugitive Oust I I 60458 0,0000 I 6.0458 I 33129 0.0000 ; 33129 • I 00000 0.0000 I I i I I i I 'I I I I • I •I I I I I I ------a ______, _ 1 _____,_______ _ -------x-------s-------_--- ---- _______I_______I _ I-------.I --------------- -Road 2.695t _ 86 __ _1__30_2_]_'__018 I _ 51__ 11,918.4851 0.5720 1,930.513 1,1269 I Total 2.6954 28.6870 118.382T I 0.0183 I Chi I 1.5510 I 7.067 I 3.3129 1.4269 1 4.7397 • 11,918A05 0.5]28 I 1,930.513 0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Iblday Wday Haulilg I O.W00 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 •I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I a a a a a a �---------------i 1 1 I •I a a.a000 � 0.0009 � o.o9ao � 9.gaoo o.0000 o.99ao � 9.gaoo � � � o.9aao •I I I I I I I I I •I i I I I I I I : ; I -----------•I __------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-----------____I Worker ; j j j O.OTI] j 0.0000 j 0.0]T] j 0.0191 j 0.0000 ; 0.0191 j 0.0000 i j � 0.0000 I i i i i i i i i I i I Total CAM 0.0000 0.07T 0.0191 0.0000 0.0191 • 0.0000 I 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM 3.3 Grading - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 TotaICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total Pli PM2.5 TWaI Category IWday Iblday Fugitive Oust I I 60458 0,0000 I 6.0458 I 33129 0.0000 ; 33129 • 1 00000 1 00000 I i i i i i I i I I I I I I I I Ott-Road 2.5976 12].505] 11].8251 I 0.0182 I I 1.47 92 I 1.4792 I 1 1.3608 ; 1 3808 • 11,898.5161 0.5721 11,908.529 2 0 I Total 2.5978 2].505] 117.8251 I 0.0182 I 6.0458 1 E792 I ].5249 3.3129 1.3608 4.6]3] • 11,896.516 0.W2:1 I 1,908.529 2 4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Iblday Wday Haulilg I O.W00 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 •I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I a a a a a a �---------------i 1 1 I •I a a.a000 � 0.0009 � o.o9ao � 9.gaoo o.0000 o.99ao � 9.gaoo � � � o.9aao •I I I I I I I I I •I i I I I I I I : ; I ...........•I __------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-----------....I Worker ; j j j O.OTI] j 0.0000 j 0.0]T] j 0.0191 j 0.0000 ; 0.01991 j 0.0000 i j � 0.0000 I i i i i i i i I i 0.Total CAM 0.0000 0.07T 0191 0.0000 0.0191 • 0.0000 I 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM 3.3 Grading - 2016 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 TotaICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total Pli PM2.5 TWaI Category IWday Iblday Fugitive Oust I I 60458 0,0000 I 6.0458 I 33129 0.0000 ; 33129 • 1 00000 1 00000 I i i i i i I i I I I I I I I I Ott-Road 2.5976 12].505] 11].8251 I 0.0182 I I 1.47 92 I 1.4792 I 1 1.3608 ; 1 3808 • 11,898.5161 0.5721 11,908.529 2 0 I Total 2.5978 2].505] 117.8251 I 0.0182 I 6.0458 1 E792 I ].5249 3.3129 1.3608 4.6]3] • 11,896.516 0.W2:1 I 1,908.529 2 4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Iblday Wday Heulilg I O.W00 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 •I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I a a a a a a �---------------i 1 1 I •I a a.a000 � 0.0009 � o.o9ao � 9.gaoo o.0000 o.99ao � 9.gaoo � � � o.9aao •I I I I I I I I I •I i I I I I I I : ; I -----------•I __------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-----------____I Worker ; j j j O.OTI] j 0.0000 j 0.0]T] j 0.0191 j 0.0000 ; 0.0191 j 0.0000 i j � 0.0000 I i i i i i i i I i 0.Total CAM 0.0000 0.07T 0191 0.0000 0.0191 • 0.0000 I 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM 3.4 Building Construction -2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 TVIaICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total Phi PM2.5 TWal Category IWday Wday Off Rivedn 38360 296W1 122.8949 i 00376 I i 20818 i 2.0818 I 20.43 ; 2.0443 :3,615.1071 0.5429 i 13,61 9 6 Total 3.8360 29.6041 122.8949 I 0.0376 I 2.0818 I 2.0818 I 2.0443 2.11 • 13,615.107 0.5429 13,626."a 9 fi Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-002 TataICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Wday Wday Haulilg I O.W00 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 0.0000 I i 0.0000 •I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I a a a a a a �---------------i 1 1 I •I a veaaor � i I I a.a000 I o.000g I o.ogao I g.gaoo o.0000 o.ggao I g.gaoo � I i o.gaao •I I I I I I I I I •I i I I I I I I : ; I -----------•I __------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-----------____I Worker ; i j j 0.0000 j 0.0000 j 0.0000 j 0.0000 j 0.0000 ; 0.0000 j 0.0000 i j i 0.0000 I i i i i i i I i I Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 I 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 14 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM 3.4 Building Construction -2016 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 TVIaICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total Phi PM2.5 TWaI Category IWday Wday Off Rivedn 38360 296W1 122.8949 i 00376 I 20818 i 2.0818 I 20.43 ; 2.0443 :3,615.1071 0.5429 i 1 I I I I 2.0443 • 1 :3,626 KB 8 16 2.04 3.615.107 0.5429 3, 60Total 3.8360 29.6041 22.8949 0.03]6 2.0818 2.0810 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-002 TataICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Wday Wday Haulilg I O.W00 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 0.0000 I i 0.0000 •I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I a a a a a a �---------------i 1 1 I •I a veaaor � i I I a.a000 I o.000g I o.ogao I g.gaoo o.0000 o.ggao I g.gaoo � I i o.gaao •I I I I I I I I I •I i I I I I I I : ; I -----------•I __------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-----------____I Worker ; i j j 0.0000 j 0.0000 j 0.0000 j 0.0000 j 0.0000 ; 0.0000 j 0.0000 i j i 0.0000 I i i i i i i I i I Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 I 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 15 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM 3.5 Paving -2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-0O2 T.WICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total Pli PM2.5 TWaI Category IWday IWday Off Rived a 10786 108808 I 7.2782 I 00103 I 07041 I MOO I 06478 ; 0,6478 • 11,065181 0.3213 I 1,071929 i i i i i i I i ] i I 0 •I I I I I I I -------_-------�_______I_______1 _i_______i_______. -Pavng____. _O_0_0__ _0 _0__xI 000 0.0000 000 • 0.00 i0000 I I I I I I i I i I I I Total 1.0788 10.8808 I ].2]82 I 0.0103 I I 0.7041 I 0.]041 I 01 1 0.64111 • 11,00181 0.3213 I 1,071.929 T 0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-002 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Wday Wday Haulitg I O.W00 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 •I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I a a a a a a �---------------i 1 1 I •I a a.a000 � 0.0009 � o.o9ao � 9.gaoo o.0000 o.99ao � 9.gaoo � � � o.9aao •I I I I I I I I I •I i I I I I I t : ; I -----------•I __------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-----------____I Worker ; j j j O.OTI] j 0.0000 j 0.0]Tr j 0.0191 j 0.0000 ; 0.0191 j 0.0000 i j � 0.0000 I i i i i i i i I i 0.Total CAM 0.0000 0.01T 0191 0.0000 0.0191 • 0.0000 I 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 16 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM 3.5 Paving -2016 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-0O2 T.WICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 P1,110 Total Phi PM2.5 TWaI Category IWday IWday Off Rived a 10786 108808 I 7.2782 I 00103 I I 07041 I MOO I 06478 ; 0,6478 • 11,065181 i 0.3213 I 1,071929 i i i i i i I i ] 1i I 0 •I I I I I I I _a ____.I __ __x _______________________I_________0_ I I I I I I 0 I I • 1 0.000D_i_______i_______.-P 00000 ving O. 00D 0.0000 .0000 0.0000 ; 00000 I I I I I I i I i I I I Total 1.0788 10.8808 I ].2]82 I 0.0103 I I 0.7041 I 0.]041 I 01 1 0.64111 • 11,00181 0.3213 I 1,071.929 T 0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-002 TataICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Wday IWday Haulitg I O.W00 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I I 0.0000 •I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I a a a a a a �---------------i 1 1 I •I a ve�aor � I I I a.a000 I o.0009 I o.o9ao 19.gaoo o.0000 o.99ao 19.gaoo � I I o.9aao •I I I I I I I I I •I i I I I I I t : ; I -----------•I __------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-----------____I Worker j I I I O.OTI] I 0.0000 I 0.0]Tr I 0.0191 j 0.0000 ; 0.0191 I 0.0000 i I I 0.0000 Total CAM 0.0000 0.01T 0.0191 0.0000 0.0191 • 0.0000 I 0.0000 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 17 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Total 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C IH-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C I H-O or C-N W Primary overlord I Pass-by L1 LDT7 LDT2 MDV LHD7 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH 3363• 0.060352•0.5 0.180146• 0.139338• 0,042155• 0006672• 0.015739• 0.030749• 0.001928• 0.002503: 0.004351: 0.000593: 0.002111 �.p&g1W.Detaii Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 18 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitve Exbaun PM10 Fugitve Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBiY-0O2 Tatsl CO2 CH4 N20 002a PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category AL lblday lb/day Mitigated v 0.o000 0.0000 I 0.00001 00000 • 0.0000 00"-i1 -1I I 0000 - • - e 0000UnmiOgated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NO. CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PMIO Fugitive Exbaasl PM2.5 Bio 002 NBio-0O2 Total 002 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2S PM2.5 Total SubCategory lblday lblday Ncbitecturel •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 • I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 Coagng I I I I .. ! a a a a a • I a 1 a I . . 0.0 Conaumer 0.0000 I 0.0000 j 000 j 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I j 0.0000 Products Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 19 of 19 Date:4/1/2015 9:00 AM 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NO. CO 502 Fugitve Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exbausl PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-0O2 Torsi CO2 CMN20 002a PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total SubCatei Ii IWeay 7hit7wN I 0.0000 I 00000 0.0000 000oo 0.0000 00000 00000 Coating ___ __me .' c _______a_______e-------a-------a-------e-------a-------a-------_------- ---____ onsur o.0000 0.0000 o.0000 0.000 o.0000 ProeuiAs i i i i i i I i i i 1 Toral 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 37 oO ' 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0o00 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 19 Date: 12/10/2014 11:55 AM OCSD Proj.No. 6-17 South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(mis) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 31 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2016 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 630.89 CH4 Intensity 0,029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (IbIMWhr) (IbIMWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics- Land Use- Construction Phase-Total days of construction are based on anticipated working days. Off-road Equipment-Construction units anticipated for this phase of the project. Off-road Equipment- Off-road Equipment-Construction units anticipated for this construction phase. Off-road Equipment- No mortar mixers are planned to be used on this project. Off-road Equipment- Planned construction units for this phase. Trips and VMT- Based on projected information. Demolition- Grading -Unknown value. CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 19 Date: 12J10/2014 11:55 AM Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 0.00 12.00 ...........................................................}-"-'-""-'-""-'-"-'-"-'4.......................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 0.00 121.00 .............................i-----------------------------}_____________________________-.......................... tblConstructionPhase i 0.00 25.00 ...........................................................}-""-'-"-'-""-""-'-"-'4.......................... tblConstructionPhase NumDays i 0.00 6.00 .............................4..............................1._____________________________4.......................... lblGratling AcrosOfGrading i 60.50 2.50 ......................................---------------------+-"-----"---------------"-- .......................... 1blGrading AcresOfGrading i 0.00 3.00 .............................i..............................F_____________________________a.......................... lblGratling MaterialEzporletl i 0.00 1,910.00 ..............................--------------------------------------"-'-"-'-'-"-'-"-'4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment OflRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 4.00 0.00 -------......................4-----------------------------.F_____________________________4-------------------------- lbIOlfRoadEquipment Of oadEquipmenlUnMmount i 1.00 0.00 ..............................-----------------------------------------------------------4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1,00 0.00 .............................4-----------------------------.F_____________________________4-------------------------- lbIOlfRoadEquipment Of oadEquipmenlUnib ount i 2.00 0.00 ..............................-----------------------------------------------------------4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 1.00 0.00 .............................4-----------------------------.F_____________________________4-------------------------- lbIOlfRoadEquipment Of oadEquipmenlUnMmount i 2.00 1.00 ..............................-----------------------------------------------------------4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount i 2.00 1.00 .............................4-----------------------------.F_____________________________4-------------------------- lbIOlfRoadEquipment UsageHours i 6.00 0.00 ..............................-----------------------------------------------------------4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment UsageHours i 8.00 0.00 .............................4-----------------------------.F_____________________________4-------------------------- lbIOlfRoadEquipment UsageHours i 4.00 8.00 ..............................-----------------------------------------------------------4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment UsageHours i 6.00 8.00 .............................4-----------------------------.F_____________________________4-------------------------- lbIOlfRoadEquipment UsageHours i 8.00 0.00 ..............................-----------------------------------------------------------4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment UsageHours i 7.00 8.00 .............................4-----------------------------.F_____________________________4-------------------------- lbIOlfRoadEquipment UsageHours i 7.00 8.00 ..............................-----------------------------------------------------------4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment UsageHours i 1,00 8.00 .............................4-----------------------------.F_____________________________4-------------------------- lbIOlfRoadEquipment UsageHours i 6.00 8.00 ..............................-----------------------------------------------------------4.......................... 1b106RoadEquipment UsageHours i 7.00 8.00 .............................4-----------------------------4------------------------------4.......................... tblProjectCharacteristics Opere6onalVear 2014 2016 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 19 Date: 12/10/2014 11:55 AM 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG I NOx CO I 802 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PIOL5 Bio-CO2 NBic-0O2 Totdl G02 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM25 PM2.5 Total Year tO118lYT Whir 2015 0.0725 I 0.]]05 j OAN4 j 4.9000e- j 0.3695 0.0419 OA114 0.2011 i 0.0306 0.2397 • 147.0124 I 0.0140 I 0.0000 47,3072 ,I ON I I I I I I I I ........... .......a_______a_______a_______a_______a_______a_______a_______a_______.._._.._........I_______a_______a_______a_______....... 2016 0.1248 j 1.2480 j 0.0344 j 9.]WOe- j 0.3893 ; 0.0716 j 0.4409 j 0.2013 j 0.0886 0.28]9 • j 90.2531 j 0.0242 j 0.0000 90.7622 •I 004 I I Total 0.1973 I 2.0193 1.3288 11.06009 I 0.7388 I 0.1135 I 0.8523 I OA024 0.1052 0.5076 • I137.26551 0.0383 0.0000 I138.0693 003 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO 302 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Errand Pli Bliti NBio-002 TogICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year tons/yr MT/yr 2015 •I 0.0]25 I 0.]]05 0.4944 I4.9001I 0.3695 I 0.0419 I OA114 I 0.2011 I 0.0366 0.2397 • 147.0124 I 0.0140 I 0.0000 1 4]30]1 •I I I 201fi . 1I I 004 d 1 1 +II 11 1II 1II J1 �_______.•i .Il aI a ' 01248 1 3688 0.03 44 9.7000e- 0. 683 0.0716 0,1409 0.2013 I � 0.O66fi 0.2fi]9 • � 90.2530 0.0242 0.0000 90.7621 i i i 004 Total 0.1973 2.0193 1.3288 1.4600.- 0.7388 0.1136 0.8523 0.4024 0.1052 0.5076 • 137.2653 0.0383 0.0000 1138.08112 003 ROG Ni CO 802 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fu9i[ive Exhaust PM25 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM o Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Tohl Percent 0.00 0.00 OAO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 19 Date: 12/10/2014 11:55 AM 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG I NO. 00 502 Fugitive Exhaust I PM10 Fugitive ExhauM PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBic-0O2 Totsl CO2 GMN20 002a PM10 PM10 Tolal PM2.5 PM2.5 Tolal Category tonal, Mrlyr Area r 0.0000 00000 l 0.0000 l 00000 0.0000 l 00000 l 00000 0.0000 i 00000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 r O.o000 r 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 Mitigated Operational ROG NO. CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Bio-CO2 NSio-0O2 TotaICO2 CHO N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Tolal PM2.5 PM2.5 Tolal Category tonstyr Mrlyr Area •r 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 l 0.0000 i i i i i I Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 ROG Nos CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 elo-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 0H4 N20 CO2e PM10 PmI0 Total PM2.5 P1112.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 19 Date: 12/10/2014 11:55 AM 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 :Site Preparation )Site Preparation 110112/2015 :10119/2015 5; 6;Mticipated working days .._....s..................... .f.--------------------- ------------4------------a--------a--------1-----._..........._.------------- :Grading lGrading 110120MO15 14/5/2016 5: 121 Mbdpaled working days i 3 :Building Construction i...... .....Construction 14/6Y2018 :4Y21/2018 5; --4M 1pated working days .._....s........................4..........._.......... _--_____+_____--+-______5: 25: .didp ._.... ing day._...... 4 •Paving :Paving •4/22I2016 •5/26/2016 5• 25•Mticipaletl woticing days Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 3 Acres of Grading(Grading Phase): 2.5 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating -sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 19 Date: 12J10/2014 11:55 AM Phase Name Oflroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation lGreders 0 0.00l 174; 0.41 .......r'a'tion.................J...._......_...._......_....___________ � ____________4...._......... Site Prepara rTractors/Loaders/Rackhoes 1� 8.00� 97' 0.37............. ...................................... ____---___}____________:............. . .............. Grading I.Concrete Saws , 0� 0.001 81; 0.73 ............................I...........................___________�____________� 4....-------------- Gratling I , 1� 8.00� 174; 0.41 ............................:..... ...._...._._.._._....___________}____________:_____________4....------------- - -------------- Grading I.Rubberubber Tired Dozers , 1 8.001 255:--4 0.40 ............................t...._......_...._._.._._.... 1 ___________4...._......... Gratling ITractorslLoatlerslBackhoes 1� 8.00� 97• 0.37 .....................................ress __________}____________:____________. . ........... 4...._......... Building Construction jAlr Compressors , 2� 8.00� 78; 0.48 ......'cns'l ................I...._......_...._._.._._.... � ____________4...._......... Builtling Cons[mction rCranes 0� 8.00� 226' 0.29 Building Construction jDumpererTendere , 2 8.00� 16; 0.38 ............................I...._......_...._._.._._....___________ � ____________4...._......... Builtling Construction rEzcavatom 1� 8.00� 162' 0.38 ........ nt Building Cosmction �Forkli fl s , 0 B.00j 89; 0.20 .......... ................I...._......_...._._.._._...._________.._.. ____________4-------------- Builtling Constm..ction rGenemtor Sets 1 84' 0.74 .......................� .}_.__________:_____________4...._......... BUIldl; Construction Pumpa , 8.001 84; 0.74 ............................ ...........................___________ ___________I ____________4...._......... Builtling Constmction rTrachus i-oaders/Rackhoes 1� 8.00I 97' 0.37 ............... _.._._...�__________}____________:_____________4...._......... Paving ICementand Mona. ..ere , 0� 0.001 9; 0.66 ............................j..._......_...._......_....___________ ___________I ____________4...._......... Paving A..... 1� 8.00I --- 0.42 , .......................�----------}------------------------__4----------- ... Paving IRollera , - 8.00� 80; 0.38 ............................:..._ s/Load _...._._.._._.._._________________ _._.____._._r_____________4-------------- Paving •TractorslLoatlerslBackhoes 1• 8.00' 97 0.37 Trios and VMT Phase Name Oflroad Equipment I Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Tnp Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Site Preparation i 1; 3.00: 0.00; 14.70; 6.90; t—_— __________ _________�—.._..i _ :__________4--------------------_-------------1----------i---------- Grading 3; 8.00 239.00, 14.70- 6.90; ................4______________s--.._..{__________1_________.__________4............ ......... ... ............ 1__________t.......... Building Construction i 9; 0.00: O.M. 14.70; 6.90; Paving • r _4 • _ _a- t r _♦ 3• 8.00• 0.00: 14.70• 6.90• CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 19 Date: 12/10/2014 11:55 AM 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Site Preparation -2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO I 502 Fugitive Exhaust PMIO I Fugitve Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NIEH -0O2 T.WCO2 GM N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 TOUT PM2.5 P142.5 TMM Category mnelyr Mrlys Ok Fugitive Dust • 11.5900e- I 0.0000 11.5900e- 11.]000e- i 0.0000 ; iJ000e- • I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I 0.0000 � 00000 003 003 006 004 I I -I I I I I i i I I I I I _______ •I _______1 _______-_______________-_____ I I I OR-Roatl 1.0800e- I 0.0103 I 7.2800e- 11.0000e- I 18.10We- 18.1000e- I 74000e- ; 7.4000e- • I 0.8913 12.7000e- I 0.0000 08969 003 003 005 004 000 004 000 006 j I Total 1.0800.. 0.0103 17.281 11.001 11.5900e- 81 12.4000e- 11.7000e- ].=. 9.1000e- • I 0.8913 2.70eee- I 0.0000 0.8989 003 003 005 003 000 003 004 000 006 am. Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitve Exhaust PM25 Bo-CO2 NBIo-0O2 ToWICO2 cm N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total category tonslyr MTlyr Haug, •I I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 00000 • I ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 � 00000 • I I I I I I I i ...v.e.n.e.nr........••:�II _._.._.._.�';�-_--_-_-_-_-a';I_--_-_--_-.-a';I.--_--_-_-_-a';I.-.--_-_-O-_-a'I_-_-_-_-0-_-_-a'I_-_-_-_-_-_-_-a'I-------a�-----------------....... o. 00 0.0000 o.000 o.000 0.0000 O.00o I II o.000II oo II 0,0000 o.00 ------- '-----------------------I 9.000Oe- 0.0000 9.0000e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.0000.- 0.00 0.000 0.0000 0.00.ker...Wo 005 005 005 005 i Total 19.000Oe- 0.0000 19.0000e- 12.0000.- 0.0000 2.0000.- • I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 11 005 005 005 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 19 Date: 12/10/2014 11:55 AM 3.2 Site Preparation -2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 TOISICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total Phi PM2.5 TWaI Category Wive r MT/p FuOgttitive Wet .I 1 1.5900e 80.1.0000000e- 11.5900e 17000e- 0.0000 1 7000 e- • I 0000 00000 0.0000 I OuOw 003 003 004 004 _x _x _ - . 8.10e 7400e- ]40e- 0.8913 2.7000e 0.0000 0.8989Road I1.0800e- 0.00 7.2800 - 1.0000e- I 003 i I 003 I 005 I i 004 I 000 I i 004 000 i 006 I I I Total 1.0800a- 0.0103 I 7.2000a- 11.0000a- 11.5900e- 81g00e- 124000a- 11.]000a- 7.4000hi 1 9.1000e- • I 0.8913 2.]0100, I 0.0000 0.8989 11 003 003 005 003 000 003 a" 000 006 004 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total Cot CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tonslyr Mrly Heulilg I I O.000O 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 • I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 .I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I a a a a a a �---------------i I 1 .I a a.a000 � o.000B � o.ogao � B.gaoo o.0000 o.BBao � B.gaoo � o.0000 � 0.0000 1 o.Baao •I I I I I I I I I •I i I I I I I I : ; I ----------- _-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-----------____ Worker I ; j j j 9.0000a- j 0.0000 j 9.000Oe- j 2.000Oe- j 0.0000 ; 2.000Oe- I O.OWO 0.0000 j 0.0000 0.0000 005 005 005 005 I I i i i i i i i Total 9.000Oe- 0.0000 9.000Ue- 2.0000e- 0.0000 2.0000.- • O.0m 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 11 005 005 005 006 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 19 Date: 12/10/2014 11:55 AM 3.3 Grading - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 TOISICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total Pli PM2.5 TWaI Category tone, MT/p Fugitive Oust I I 0.M58 0.0000 I 0.3858 I 02004 0.0000 ; 02004 • 1 00wit 00000 I 0.0000 i 00000 i i i i I i i I ,I I I , ,I I I I I I I __4_ I_______e_______ -------_-------_------ _ Ott-Road O.W14 I 0.]602 I 0.4871 14.8000e- I I 0. 411 0 I 0.0411 I 0.0378 ; 0.03]8 • 148.1212 I 0.0138 I 0.0000 i 46.4103 I I 000 I Total 0.0711 j 0.7002 I 0.4871 14.8000e- 1 0.3058 I 0.0411 I Qmw I 0.2004 0.037e 1 0.2382 • 1 148.1212 j 0.0138 I 0.0000 1 40.4103 11 004 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total Cot CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tonslyr Mrly Heulilg I I 0.W00 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 • I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 •I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I venaor .d••III �i a�II a�II a�II aII aII aII a I _______ i; II I e a.a000 0.0009 0.0900 9.gaoo 0.0000 0.990 9.0aoo 0.000 1 0.0090 1 oaao ........... e-------.-------.-------.-------.-------.-------.-------.----------- Worker I ; j j j 2.0200e- j 0.0000 j 2.0200e- j 6.91 j 0.0000 ; 4.9000e- I 0.0000 0.0000 j 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 I I i i i i i i i Total 2.0200e- 0.0000 2.0200a- 4.9000e- 0.0000 4.901 • 0.0m 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 11 003 003 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 19 Date: 12/10/2014 11:55 AM 3.3 Grading - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 TOISICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total Phi PM2.5 TWaI Category Wive r MT/p Fu_Og_ttit_ive Wet 0.M58 0.0000 II 088II 020 0.0000 02004 �•• I I 00wit 00000 I 0.0000 I 00000 ------4 ______ _ ______ _______ _______ _ _______ _______ _______________ _ _______e_______ -------_-------_------ - ___ _ 0.011 0.0378 0378 46.1211 0.0138 0.0000 46.4102Rod .IO.W14 0.] 0 0.48]1 4.800e- 000 _ I Total 0.0711 j 0.7002 I 0.4871 14.8000e- 1 0.3058 I 0.0411 I Qmw I 0.2004 0.037e 1 0.2382 • 1 148.1211 j 0.0138 I 0.0000 1 40.4102 11 004 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total Cot CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tonslyr Mrly Heulilg I I o.W00 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 • I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 .I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I veeaor .d••III �i a�II a�II a�II aII aII aII a I _______ i; II I e1 . a.a000 0.0009 0.0900 9.gaoo 0.0000 0.990 9.0aoo 0.000 0.0090 1 oaao ----------- e-------.-------.-------.-------e-------.-------.-------.--------------- Worker I ; j j j 2.0200e- j 0.0000 j 2.0200e- j 6.91 j 0.0000 ; 4.9000e- I 0.0000 0.0000 j 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 004 004 I I i i i i i i i Total 2.0200e- 0.0000 2.0200a- 4.9000e- 0.0000 4.901 • 0.0m 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 11 003 003 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 19 Date: 12/10/2014 11:55 AM 3.3 Grading - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 TOISICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total Pli PM2.5 TWaI Category tone, MT/p Fugitive Oust _ ______ - I I 0.M58 0.0000 I 0.3658 I 02004 0.0000 ; 02004 • 1 00wit 00000 I 0.0000_______________�_______._______i 00000 I I I I I I I I .I I I • .I I I • I I I I I I __4 I . Ott Road 0.0883 I 0.9352 I 0.6081 16.2000e- I I 0.0503 I 0.0503 I 0.0463 ; 00483 • 158.496] I 0.01]6 I 0.0000 i 58.86]2 I I 004 I Total 0.0883 0.9352 I 0.6061 1 CM00e- I 0.3658 00503 I 0.4161 I 0.2004 0.0463 1 0.2487 • 158.4987 0.0176 I 0.0000 581 11 004 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tonslYr Mrly Heulilg I I 0.W00 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 • I 0.0000 00000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 .I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I venaor .d••III �i a�II a�II a�II aII aII aII a I _______ i; II I e1 . a.a000 0.0009 0.0900 9.gaoo 0.0000 0.990 9.0aoo 0.000 0.0090 1 oaao e-------.-------.-------.-------e-------.-------.-------.----------- Worker I ; j j j 2.5900e- j 0.0000 j 2.5900e- j 6.4000e- j 0.0000 ; 6.6000e- I 0.0000 0.0000 j 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 OOd 004 I I i i i i i i i Total 2.5900e- 0.0000 2.4900a- 6.4000e- 0.0000 6.4000.- • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 11 003 003 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 19 Date: 12/10/2014 11:55 AM 3.3 Grading - 2016 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 TOISICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total Phi PM2.5 TWaI Category Wive r MT/p Fugitive Oust _ ______ - I I 0.M58 0.0000 I 0.3658 I 02004 0.0000 ; 02004 • 1 00000 00000 I 0.0000_______________�_______._______i 00000 I I I I I I I I .I I I • .I I I • I I I I I I __4 I . Ott Road 0.0883 I 0.9352 I 0.6081 16.2000e- I I 0.0503 I 0.0503 I 0.0463 ; 00483 • 158.4966 0.01]6 I 0.0000 i 58.88]2 I I 004 I Total 0.0883 0.9352 I 0.6061 1 CM00e- I 0.3658 00503 I 0.4161 I 0.2004 0.0463 1 0.2487 • 158.4988 0.0176 I 0.0000 581 11 004 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tonslYr Mrly Heulilg I I o.W00 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 • I 0.0000 00000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 .I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I veeaor .d••III �i a�II a�II a�II aII aII aII a I _______ i; II I e1 . a.a000 0.0009 0.0900 9.gaoo 0.0000 0.990 9.0aoo 0.000 0.0090 1 oaao ----------- e-------.-------.-------.-------e-------.-------.----------------------- Worker I ; j j j 2.5900e- j 0.0000 j 2.5900e- j 6.4000e- j 0.0000 ; 6.6000e- I 0.0000 0.0000 j 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 OOd 004 I I i i i i i i i Total 2.5900e- 0.0000 2.4900a- 6.4000e- 0.0000 6.4000.- • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 11 003 003 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 19 Date: 12/10/2014 11:55 AM 3.4 Building Construction -2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO 1 S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 TOISICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total Phi PM2.5 TWal Category Wive r MT/yr Off-Road n 00230 01776 I 0.1374 12.3000e- 1 0.0125 1 0.0125 1 0.0123 ; 0.0123 1 196774 1 2.9600, 1 0.0000 1 197395 004 I 003 Total 0.0230 UATTO I 0.1374 12.30040e. I 0.0125 I0.0125I 0.0123 0.0123 • 1 2.9600I 0.0000 119.7395 00 T 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 TataICo2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tonsi Mrlyr Heulilg I I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 • I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 .I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I 1 6.g I 1 .I a a a a a a a ve,laor � 1 1 1 .a000 0000g oogao 6g 1 . 1 . 1 . aoo 00000 o6g� . . ao a 1 aoo o.� 0000 1 0.0060 1 o.gaao •I I I I I I I I I •I i I I I I I I : ; I ----------- I __------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-----------____I Worker ; i i i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 j 0.0000 ; 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I i i i i i i I i I Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.00m CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 14 of 19 Date: 12/10/2014 11:55 AM 3.4 Building Construction -2016 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO 1 S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 TOISICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total Phi PM2.5 TWal Category Wive r MT/yr Off-Road n 00230 01776 I 0.1374 12.3000e- i 0.0125 I 0.0125 I 0.0123 ; 0.0123 1196774 2.9600, I 0.0000 1 197395 004 I 003 Total 0.0230 UATTO I 0.1374 12.30040e. I 0.0125 I0.0125I 0.0123 0.0123 • 1 2.9600I 0.0000 119.7395 00 T 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 TataICo2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tonsi Mrlyr Heulilg I I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 • I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 .I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I a a a a a a �---------------i I 1 .I a ve�aor � i I I a.a000 I o.000g I o.ogao 16.gaoo o.0000 o.6gao 16.gaoo � o.0000 I 0.0060 i o.gaao •I I I I I I I I I •I i I I I I I I : ; I ----------- I __------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-----------____I Worker ; i j j 0.0000 j 0.0000 j 0.0000 j 0.0000 j 0.0000 ; 0.0000 j 0.0000 i 0.0000 j 0.0000 i 0.0000 I i i i i i i I i I Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 15 of 19 Date: 12/10/2014 11:55 AM 3.5 Paving -2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust I PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 T.WICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 P1,110 Total Phi PM2.5 TWal Category Wive, Mrlyr Off-Road a 00135 01360 I 0.0910 11.3001 I 88000c I a8000e- I 8.1000 ; 81000, • 1120790 3.6400e- I 0.0000 1121555 .I 004 I 003 I 003 I 003 003 I 003 I j •I I I I I I I • Pa_v_ing____.a__0_.0_0__ 0_.0_0_0_ 0.0000 amoo- 00_00 0_.00_ 0_.000_ 0,0000 00000 I I I I I I i I i I I I I .0910 1 . B. I 9.1000e- 8.1000e- • 112.0790 3.6400e- I 0.0000 12.1555Total 0.0135 0.1360 0 1000 e00 0003 00] 003 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total Cot CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tonslyr Mrlyr Heulilg I I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 • I 0.0000 00000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 .I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I a a a a a a �---------------i I 1 .I a a.a000 � 0.0006 � o.o6ao � 6.gaoo o.0000 o.66ao � 6.gaoo � o.0000 � 0.0060 1 o.6aao •I I I I I I I I I •I i I I I I I I : ; I ----------- _-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-----------____ Worker I ; j j j 9.5000a- j 0.0000 j 9.S000e- j 2.3000e- j 0.0000 ; 2.3000e- • j 0.0000 0.0000 j 0.0000 0.0000 I � � 004 004 � 004 � 004 � I � I Total 19.5000e- 0.0000 1 9.5000e- 2.3000.- 0.0000 2ao00.- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 11 004 Boa 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 16 of 19 Date: 12/10/2014 11:55 AM 3.5 Paving -2016 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust I PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 T.WICO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 P1,110 Total Phi PM2.5 TWal Category Wive, Mrlyr Off-Road a 00135 01360 I 0.0910 11.3001 I 88000c i a8000e- I 8.1000e- ; 81000, • 1120T89 I 3.8400e- I 0.0000 1121555 .I 004 I i 003 I 003 I 003 003 I I 003 I •I I I I I I I • Pa_v_ing____.a__0_.0_0__ 0_.0_0_0_ 0.0000 amoo- 00_00 0.000D 0.0000 0.0000 00000 I I I I I I i I i I I I I .0910 1 . B. I 8.1000e- 8.1000e- • 112.0789 3.6400e- I 0.0000 12.1555Total 0.0135 0.1360 0 1000 e00 0003 00] 003 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NO CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM25 Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 TataICo2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tonsi Mrlyr Heulilg I I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 • I 0.0000 00000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 .I I I I I I I I I • I •I I I I I I I a a a a a a �---------------i I 1 .I a verlaor � I I I a.a000 I o.0006 I o.o6ao 16.gaoo o.0000 o.66ao 16.gaoo � o.0000 I 0.0060 I o.6aao •I I I I I I I I I •I i I I I I I I : ; I ----------- _-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-------_-----------____ Worker I j I I 19.5000a- I 0.0000 19.5000e- 12.3000e- j 0.0000 ; 2.3000e- • I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I I o04 004 I 004 � 004 I I I I Total 19.5000e- 0.0000 19.5000e- 2.3000.- 0.0000 2ao00.- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 11 004 Boa 004 004 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 17 of 19 Date: 12/10/2014 11:55 AM 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Total 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C IH-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C I H-O or C-N W Primary overlord I Pass-by L1 LDT7 LDT2 MDV LHD7 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH 3363• 0.060352•0.5 0.180146• 0.139338• 0,042155• 0006672• 0.015739• 0.030749• 0.001928• 0.002503: 0.004351: 0.000593: 0.002111 �.p&g1W.Detaii Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 18 of 19 Date: 12/10/2014 11:55 AM ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive EM.un PM10 Fugitive ExM1ausl PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBia-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 002a PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CategoN tonslyr MTlyr AL Mitigated v 0.o000 0.0000 I 0.00001 00000 • 0.0000 0000-0i1 00000-1I 0.0000 1j 00000 - • - e 0000UnmiOgated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NO. CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PMIO Fugitive Exhaaal PM2.5 Bio 002 NBiO-0O2 Total 002 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2S PM2.5 Total SubCategory tonslyr MTlyr Nchitectural •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 • I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 Coating I I ........... i------a-------a ------a-------a-------a----0--a��������-----0--. 0.60;6 �.......I-------a-----O-1���;��-a ------ i...... Conaumer 0.0000 I 0.0000 j 0.0000 j j 0.0000 0.0000 • O.00DO I 0.0000 j 0.0000 0.0000 Products Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 19 of 19 Date: 12/10/2014 11:55 AM 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NO. CO 502 Fugitve Exbaun PM10 Fugitive Exbausl PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBia-0O2 Te•sICO2 CMN20 002. PM10 MinTotal PM2.5 PM2.5 Total subCategon tonw r W/yr N ,t7wN n 0.0000 I 00000 ' 0.0000 ' 0woo ; oui • ' 00000 ' town 0.0000 I OOOW Coating •' I ' ' ' ' ' I i ___ __ •' ' ___ 'a_ _ _____ ________________ consumer 0.0000 ' ' ' ' ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' ' o.0000 o.0000 ' o.oggo ' o.0000 ' o.0000 I o.00ro Protlucls TOW 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' own 0.0000 ' 0.0o00 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0o00 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation Appendix C - Biological Resources Site Walk and Landscaping Plan 1136054A Page intentionally blank 1136054.1 Figure 1: MH-020 Looking North Figure 2: MH-025 Looking North M— W�w Ik Y J I Figure 3: MH-135 Looking North Figure 4: MH-140 Looking South r J 1136054.1 1 � � bran it fi '�' 2�•Sy,.�at-s �a� r p� }II A t x 1 }�(� t I , t Figure 9: Southern End of Swale, Figure 10: Northern End of Swale, Looking North Looking South r Figure 11: MH-165 Looking East Figure 12: Vegetated Area around ABAN-MH and MH-170* t� s e i a; A Note:Exact location of ABAN-MH is unknown; MH-170 is located immediately behind fenceline to the right of the picture(out offrame) 1136054.1 Figure 13: MH-180 Figure 14: MH 190 Figure 15: MH-195 Figure 16: MH-200 1136054.1 Figure 17; MH-205 and MH-210 _� - ON 1136054.1 Page intentionally blank. 1136054.1 Section 02810 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PART1 - GENERAL 1.1 THE REQUIREMENT A. The CONTRACTOR shall furnish all tools, equipment, materials, and supplies and shall perform all labor required to complete the Work as indicated on the Drawings and specified herein. B. This Specification section covers the refurbishment of automatic irrigation systems, complete and operable, in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. C. The irrigation system shall include, but not be limited to, all pipes, fittings, sprinklers, valves, automatic control valves, controllers, valve boxes, drain valves, hose bibb valves, operating wrenches, riser assemblies, direct burial wires, electrical connections, wiring and other appurtenances, piping, connections, testing, cleanup, maintenance and adjustments necessary for a complete operating system, ready for immediate use upon completion. Minor items necessary for proper construction and functional operation of this system, not specifically described in the Contract Documents, shall be included as a part of the Work of this Specification section. 1.2 RELATED WORK SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE A. The requirements of the following sections and divisions apply to the Work of this Specification section. Other sections and divisions of the Specifications, not referenced below, shall also apply to the extent required for proper performance of this Work. 1. Section 02900, Landscaping 1.3 REFERENCE SPECIFICATIONS, CODES, AND STANDARDS A. All Work specified herein shall conform to or exceed the applicable requirements of the referenced portions of the following publications to the extent that the provisions thereof are not in conflict with other provisions of these Specifications. B. Comply with the applicable editions of the following codes, regulations and standards. 1. Industry Standards: ASTM D 1784 Standard Specification for Rigid Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Compounds and Chlorinated Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC)Compounds ASTM D 1785 Standard Specification for Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Plastic Pipe, Schedules 40,80, and 120 ASTM D 2219 Standard Specification for Poly(Vinyl Chloride) Insulation for Wire and Cable, 60°C Operation District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION Project No. 6-17 02810-1 ASTM D 2220 Standard Specification for Poly(Vinyl Chloride) Insulation for Wire and Cable, 75 Degrees C Operation ASTM D 2464 Standard Specification for Threaded Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Plastic Pipe Fittings, Schedule 80 ASTM D 2466 Standard Specification for Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Plastic Pipe Fittings, Schedule 40 ASTM D 2467 Standard Specification for Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Plastic Pipe Fittings, Schedule 80 ASTM D 2774 Standard Practice for Underground Installation of Thermoplastic Pressure Piping ASTM D 2855 Standard Practice for Making Solvent-Cemented Joints with Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Pipe and Fittings C. Comply with the applicable reference Specifications as directed in the General Requirements and the Additional General Requirements. 1.4 CONTRACTOR SUBMITTALS A. Submittals shall be made in accordance with the General Requirements, Additional General Requirements and as specified herein. B. The following submittals and specific information shall be provided. 1. Submit complete lists of irrigation materials and equipment, include manufacturers name and address, specific trade names, catalog numbers complete with illustrations and/or necessary descriptive literature and clearly mark or underline proposed items. 2. Prior to final inspection, submit "As-Built" drawings, showing locations of all valves, pipes (lines), heads, dimensions, controllers, control lines, and electrical wires. Accurately dimension location including depths of all piping, valves, and control equipment as installed. 1.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. General 1. In addition to other inspection as provided by the ENGINEER, the CONTRACTOR shall give at least 72 hours' notice to the ENGINEER for scheduling the following special inspections: a. The layout of the system. b. Inspection of trenches, backflling,and equipment. c. Pressure tests. LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project No. 6.17 02810-2 d. Coverage adjustment. e. Automatic operation. 2. The CONTRACTOR shall notify the ENGINEER at least 72 hours prior to performing the tests. All tests shall be performed in the presence of the ENGINEER. Test requirements shall be: a. After assembly and installation, all water pipes, fittings, automatic equipment, and appurtenances shall be tested at a hydrostatic pressure of 150 psi at the lowest point of the system for not less than 60 minutes. b. Water lines and valves that show evidence of leakage or fail to be watertight shall be repaired or replaced. After all repairs or replacements have been made,the above-required tests shall be performed again. c. When the sprinkler system is completed, the CONTRACTOR, in the presence of the ENGINEER, shall perform a water coverage test of planting areas. The CONTRACTOR shall furnish all material and perform all Work required to correct any inadequacies of coverage disclosed. The CONTRACTOR shall inform the ENGINEER of any deviation from the Drawings required due to wind, planting, soil, or site conditions that bear on proper coverage. d. Upon completion of each phase of the Work, the CONTRACTOR shall check and adjust each sprinkler head to meet the site requirements and the requirements of the Contract Documents. 1.6 OPERATING MANUALS AND EQUIPMENT A. Furnish ENGINEER with operating and maintenance manuals for all irrigation system equipment. B. Explain, in detail, all irrigation equipment operation and maintenance procedures to the OCSD personnel as directed by the ENGINEER before completion of the Project. C. Provide ENGINEER with a reduced legible copy of the "as-installed" irrigation plan hermetically sealed in a plastic cover to be installed in the controller cover. D. Provide one pull box key for each pull box installed. E. Provide five extra sprinkler heads, including body, nozzle and screen, for each type and arc of sprinkler head installed on this Contract. 1.7 EXISTING UTILITIES AND CONDITIONS A. Prior to cutting into the soil, the CONTRACTOR shall locate all cables, conduits, sewers, septic tanks, and other such underground utilities, and shall take proper precautions not to damage or disturb such improvements. If a conflict exists between such obstacles and the proposed Work, the CONTRACTOR shall promptly notify the ENGINEER. District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION Project No. 6.17 02810.3 B. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for coordinating its Work with the operation of existing utilities and new utilities on the Project. The CONTRACTOR shall notify the ENGINEER or its representative when utilities that are in operation need to be shut off. C. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible to hand-water all down-stream planting areas from any water shut-off due to cutting of mainlines or lateral non-pressure lines. All plantings downstream of any water shut off or water source piping shall be kept in a vigorous growing condition until the restoration of source water is provided. Any plantings which show stress or die due to the absence of source water shall be replaced in kind by the CONTRACTOR to the ENGINEER's satisfaction. D. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible to flush out all downstream piping, both pressure mainline and non-pressure lateral lines from any bypass or cutting of either pressure mainline or lanteral non-pressure pipes. All lateral pipes shall have existing nozzles removed and pipes thoroughly flushed to remove any debris which may have entered the pipe at the point of cutting. E. Due to the scale of the Drawings, it is not possible to indicate all offsets, fittings, etc., that may be required. The CONTRACTOR shall carefully investigate the structural and finished conditions affecting all its Work, and plan its Work accordingly, furnishing such fittings, etc., as may be required to meet such conditions. The Contract Documents are generally diagrammatic and indicative of the Work to be installed. The Work shall be installed in the most direct and workmanlike manner, so that conflicts between sprinkler systems, planting, structures, piping, and etc.will be avoided. F. The CONTRACTOR shall verify the water pressure and the flow available at the site before installation of the system to make sure there is adequate pressure to properly operate sprinkler heads and valves, and shall also provide pressure reducing valves if required. Pressure at the point of connection shall be included on the "As-Built" record drawings. If the pressure provided at jobsite or any other job condition will create problems that will prevent proper operation of the irrigation system, the ENGINEER shall be notified before commencement of any Work. Minor additions and adjustments of heads, piping, and circuits shall be made at no additional cost to OCSD where it is necessary to make the irrigation system operate properly. 1.8 STORAGE OF MATERIALS A. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for storage of materials and for damage to the Work covered by these Contract Documents before Final Acceptance of its Work. The CONTRACTOR shall securely cover openings into the system, and shall cover all apparatus, equipment, and appliances both before and after being set in place to prevent obstruction in the pipes and the breakage, misuse, or disfigurement of said apparatus, equipment, or appliances. 1.9 SCHEDULING AND COORDINATION A. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for making arrangements for the coordination of its construction operations with those of all others on the job. The CONTRACTOR shall permit others engaged in Work to accomplish their portion of Work without undue interference or delay. B. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for the scheduling and coordination of the electrical and water connections and the installation of the piping and equipment in a LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project No. 6.17 02810.4 manner that will affect the earliest completion of the Work in conformance with the construction progress schedules. 1.10 WARRANTY A. Guarantee the entire irrigation system against defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one(1)year from the date of Final Completion. B. Should any deficiencies develop within the specified guarantee period due to inferior or faulty material and workmanship, correct such deficiencies without added expense to OCSD. The correction of the deficiencies shall be subject to acceptance by the ENGINEER. C. OCSD reserves the right to make temporary repairs as necessary to keep the irrigation system equipment in operating condition. The exercise of this right by OCSD will not relieve the CONTRACTOR of his responsibilities under the terms of the guarantee. D. Repair any settlement or backfilled trenches that may occur during a 30-day period after Final Acceptance by the ENGINEER, without extra cost to OCSD, including the complete restoration of all damaged planting, paving, or other improvements of any kind. The repair shall be subject to acceptance by the ENGINEER. PART 2- PRODUCTS 2.1 PIPE AND FITTINGS A. Plastic Pipe: Rigid polyvinyl chloride PVC 1220 (Type 1, Grade 2), conforming to ASTM D 1785. (PVC pipe marked with product standard PS-21-70 conforms to ASTM requirements.) B. All pipes shall be homogeneous throughout and free from cracks, holes, foreign materials, blisters, deleterious wrinkles, and dents. C. Use Schedule 40 PVC plastic pipe for installation on the discharge side of control valves and Schedule 80 PVC plastic pipe for continuously pressurized pipe on the supply side of control valves unless otherwise indicated. D. Supply Schedule 80 PVC plastic pipes only, when threaded joints are specified, or otherwise permitted by the ENGINEER. E. Al pipes shall be permanently marked with the following: Manufacturer's name or trademark, size, schedule, and type of pipe, working pressure at 73 degrees F and National Sanitation Foundation (N.S.F.)approval. F. Fittings and Couplings for Plastic Pipe: Threaded or slip-fitting tapered socket solvent weld type. Provide threaded adapters with socket pipe for connections to threaded pipe. Plastic pipe fittings and couplings shall be PVC I or PVC 1/II material supplied in the same schedule size specified for the pipe. The type of plastic materials and schedule size shall be marked on each fitting or coupling. G. VALVES AND VALVE BOXES District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION Project No. 6-17 02810-5 H. General: Provide valves of the type and capacity designated on the Drawings and with the requirements specified herein. I. SPRAY HEADS J. Provide equipment of one type and flow characteristic from the same manufacturer and bearing the manufacturer's name as the existing heads and and bodies. 2.2 AUTOMATIC CONTROLLERS A. CONTRACTOR shall identify if the controller is stand-alone or a satellite controller of a central control system. Should the controller be on a central control system, the CONTRACTOR shall notify the system operator of work to be done on the system. 2.3 ACCESSORIES A. Provide two each special head wrenches for installation, removal, and adjustment for each type and make of sprinkler equipment. Provide two keys each for valve boxes. PART 3- EXECUTION 3.1 GENERAL A. Inspection: In all cases where inspection of the irrigation system is required and where portions of the Work are specified to be performed under the direction and inspection of the ENGINEER, notify the Inspector at least 48 hours in advance of the times such inspection and direction are required. B. Verifications: All scaled dimensions are approximate. Carefully check and verify all dimensions before proceeding with any Work. Immediately notify the ENGINEER should any errors or conflicts in the Drawings and Specifications and/or actual jobsite conditions be found that would affect the proper execution of the irrigation Work. Do not work in areas where such discrepancies occur until further instructed by the ENGINEER. 3.2 IRRIGATION SYSTEM INSTALLATION A. General 1. Perform all Work on the irrigation system, including hydrostatic and coverage tests, preliminary operational test of the automatic control system, and the backfill and densification of trenches and other excavations after topsoil Work and before planting, except as otherwise provided or directed. 2. With ENGINEER's authorization, make adjustments where necessary to conform to actual field conditions. 3. Make the irrigation system operational with uniform and adequate coverage of the areas to be irrigated, prior to planting. 4. Make water and utility connections as shown on the Drawings or designated by the utility company. LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project No. 6-17 02810-6 5. Where piping on the Drawings is shown under paved areas but running parallel and adjacent to planted areas, the intent of the Drawings is to install piping in the planted area. B. Trench Excavating and Backfilling 1. Size trenches and other excavations to accommodate the irrigation system components, conduits, and other required facilities. Provide additional space to assure proper installation and access for inspections. 2. Unless otherwise specified, the minimum depth of cover over pipelines and conduits shall be as follows: a. Electrical conduit—24 inches (36 inches under roadways) b. Waterlines continuously pressurized—24 inches(36 inches under roadways) c. Lateral sprinkler lines—12 inches 3. Make the bottom of trenches true to grade and free of protruding stones, roots, or other matter that would prevent proper bedding of pipe or other facilities. 4. Backfll trenches so that the specified thickness of topsoil is restored to the upper part of the trench. Compact trench backfll through paved areas in 8-inch layers to 95 percent relative compaction up to subgrade to receive asphalt concrete paving and base material. 5. Resurface trenches through paved areas to match an existing pavement. C. Irrigation Pipeline Installation 1. Install pipe fittings in accordance with the manufacturers recommendations and these Specifications. When requested by the ENGINEER, furnish the manufacturers printed installation instructions before pipe installation. 2. Bed pipes in at least 2 inches of finely divided material to provide a firm, uniform bearing. Surround the pipe with additional finely divided material to at least 2 inches over the top of the pipe. 3. Deposit trench backfill sufficient to anchor the pipe before the pipeline pressure testing, except that joints shall remain exposed until satisfactory completion of testing. 4. When two or more pipelines are installed in the same trench, separate the pipelines by a minimum horizontal clear distance of 4 inches. Install equipment so that each pipeline, valve, or other component may be serviced or replaced without disturbing another. 5. Accomplish all assemblies as specified and in accordance with the manufacturers directions. 6. During installation of pipe, fittings, valves, and other pipeline components, prevent foreign matter from entering the system. Temporarily cap or plug all open ends at cessation of installation operations. District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION Project No. 6-17 02810-7 7. Accomplish changes in pipeline size with reducer fittings. 8. Place all mainlines under paving in Schedule 40 PVC sleeves. Oversize the sleeves sufficiently to house the pipe,fittings, and control valves. D. Plastic Pipeline 1. Join plastic pipe with socket type solvent welded fittings, threaded fittings, rubber ring fittings, or by other means specified. Install steel pipe first when plastic pipe is jointed to steel pipe. 2. Cut square, externally chamfer approximately 10 to 15 degrees, and remove all burrs and fins. 3. Make solvent welded joints in accordance with ASTM D 2855. Use the solvent recommended by the pipe manufacturer. 4. Install plastic pipe in accordance with ASTM D 2774 and the requirements herein. 5. Exercise care in assembling a pipeline with solvent welded joints so that stress on previously made joints is avoided. Handling of the pipe following jointing, such as lowering the assembled pipeline into the trench, shall not occur prior to the set times specified in ASTM D 2855, 6. Apply solvent to pipe ends in such a manner that no material is deposited on the interior surface of the pipe or extruded into the interior of the pipe during jointing. Wipe off excess cement on the exterior of the joint immediately after assembly. 7. Plastic pipes shall not be field threaded. 8. Make threaded joints using Teflon tape or other approved jointing material. Do not use solvent with threaded joints. 9. Protect pipe from tool damage during assembly. Use vises with padded jaws and strap wrenches for installation of fittings and nipples. 10. Remove and replace plastic pipe that has been nicked, scarred, or otherwise damaged. 11. Snake plastic pipe from side to side in the trench to allow 1 foot of expansion and contraction per 100 feet of straight run. 12. Do not expose pipelines to water for 24 hours after the last solvent welded joint is made. E. Irrigation Head Installation and Adjustment 1. General: Flush and pressure test all mains and laterals, including risers, before installing irrigation heads, after which perform a water coverage test. 2. Location, Elevation, and Spacing LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project No.6-17 02810.8 a. Do not exceed the maximum irrigation head spacing shown on the Drawings or recommended by the manufacturer. b. Locate irrigation heads projecting above finish grades at least 6 inches away from adjacent curbs, walks, paving, and similar improvements unless otherwise indicated. 3. irrigation Head Adjustment a. When all irrigation heads are installed and the irrigation system is operating, adjust and balance each section or unit with all section control valves fully open to obtain uniform and adequate coverage. b. Adjust irrigation heads having adjustable pin nozzles, screws or orifices to provide adequate distribution of water over the coverage pattern. Without additional cost to OCSD, substitute larger or smaller nozzle cores in nonadjustable sprinkler heads as necessary. F. Automatic Control System Installation 1. General: Install a complete automatic irrigation control system, including low- voltage direct burial wiring, and all necessary accessories. 2. Locate splices only in specified pull boxes and make splices with a packaged kit approved for underground use. Set pull boxes to finish grades on a 12-inch-deep layer of 1-inch crushed rock. 3. House control wiring in conduits between the controller and a concrete electrical pull box at the base of the controller. House control wire under all paved areas in Schedule 40 PVC pipe sleeve. All other wiring issuing from the pull box shall be direct burial installed in the main or lateral waterline trenches wherever practicable. 4. Bundle and secure the wiring to the lower quadrant of the irrigation pipeline at 10-foot intervals with plastic electrical tape. Leave sufficient slack in the wiring to provide for expansion and contraction. When control wiring cannot be installed in a pipe trench, install control wiring at least 18 inches below finish grade and install a bright colored plastic ribbon with suitable markings in the trench 6 inches below finish grade directly over the wire. 5. Color-code all common wire white. Color-code all control wire to match existing. Leave at least 2 feet of coiled slack at each splice and point of connection inside of valve boxes as applicable. 6. Test all wiring for continuity, open circuits and unintentional grounding prior to any cutting of wire. CONTRACTOR shall provide to the ENGINEER the condition of all existing wires prior to any wire splicing or cutting. This verification shall be in writing and on CONTRACTOR letterhead dated prior to any splicing or cutting of existing wires and shall verify that all existing systems are operable from the existing controller location. Provide same to central control operator should existing controller be on a central control system. 7. Leave the control system in operating condition. District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION Project No. 6-17 02810.9 3.3 FLUSHING AND TESTING A. After completion, and prior to the installation of any terminal fittings, thoroughly flush the entire pipeline system to remove dirt, scale, or other material. Remove sprinkler heads and flush thoroughly after cutting of any lateral non-pressure lines. B. After flushing, conduct the following tests in the sequence listed below. Provide all equipment, materials, and labor necessary to perform the tests. Conduct all tests in the presence of the ENGINEER and the Inspector. 1. Pipeline Pressure Test: Perform awater-pressure test on all pressure mains and laterals before any couplings, fittings, valves, etc. are concealed. Cap all open ends after the water enters the line in such a manner that all air will be expelled. Test pressure mains with all control valves to lateral lines closed. After the pressure main test, open all valves to test lateral lines. The constant test pressure and the duration of the test are as follows: All pipes shall be pressure tested at 200 psi for 2 (two)hours. 2. Sprinkler Coverage Test: Perform the coverage test after sprinkler heads have been installed. Demonstrate that each section or unit in the system is balanced to provide uniform and adequate coverage of the areas serviced. Correct any deficiencies. 3. Operational Test: Evaluate the performance of all components of the automatic control system for manual and automatic operation. Make all necessary repairs, replacements, and adjustments until all equipment, electrical Work, controls and instrumentation are functioning in accordance with the Contract Documents. LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project No.6-17 02810.10 Section 02900 LANDSCAPING PART1 - GENERAL 1.1 THE REQUIREMENT A. The CONTRACTOR shall furnish all tools, equipment, materials, and supplies and shall perform all labor required to complete the Work as indicated on the Drawings and specified herein. B. Landscaping as referred to herein shall include, but not be limited to the following Work: soil preparation, installation of headers,weed control,finish grading, furnishing and installing plant materials,tree staking and tying, cleanup, maintenance, and guarantee. 1. As part of this Work, the Contractor shall have an agronomic soils test prepared for the site. The Contractor shall install soil amendments and fertilizers per the recommendations in the soils report. The contract baseline cost for these soil amendments and fertilizers is $10,000. If the cost of soil amendments and fertilizers is greater than $10,000 this will be considered a changed condition and the cost greater than $10,000 will be paid for at a negotiated price as a Change Order. 1.2 RELATED WORK SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE A. The requirements of the following sections and divisions apply to the Work of this section. Other sections and divisions of the Specifications, not referenced below, shall also apply to the extent required for proper performance of this Work. 1. Section 02110, Clearing, Grubbing, and Stripping 2. Section 02200, Earthwork 3. Section 02810, Landscape Irrigation 1.3 REFERENCE SPECIFICATIONS, CODES, AND STANDARDS A. All Work specified herein shall conform to or exceed the applicable requirements of the referenced portions of the following publications to the extent that the provisions thereof are not in conflict with other provisions of these Specifications. B. Comply with the applicable editions of the following codes, regulations and standards. 1. Codes and Regulations: 29 CFR 1910 Code of Federal Regulations, Title 29, Part 1910, U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Standards (OSHA) 29 CFR 1926 Code of Federal Regulations, Title 29, Part 1926, U.S. Safety and Health Regulations For Construction (OSHA) District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPING Project No.6-17 02900.1 CAC California Agricultural Code CCR California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Industrial Relations (Cal/OSHA) 2. Industry Standards: ANLA American Standard For Nursery Stock ASTM D 422 Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils ASTM D 2434 Standard Test Method for Permeability of Granular Soils (Constant Head) SSPWC "Green Book", Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction 3. Other Standards: USCC US Composting Council C. Comply with the applicable reference Specifications as directed in the General Requirements and the Additional General Requirements. 1.4 CONTRACTOR SUBMITTALS A. Submittals shall be made in accordance with the General Requirements, Additional General Requirements and as specified herein B. General: The CONTRACTOR shall furnish a certificate with each delivery or bulk material delivery, stating source, quantity, and type of material. All materials shall conform to Specification requirements. All certificates shall be delivered to the ENGINEER at the time of each delivery. All bulk-delivered materials shall be delivered with level load volume plainly marked on the truck bed. C. Topsoil Report: Topsoil report, as well as literature on fertilizers shall be submitted as specified. D. Certificates of Inspection: Certificates of inspection of plant material, as may be required by federal, state, or other authorities having jurisdiction, shall be furnished and accompany the shipment. E. Samples: Typical samples, three of each variety and size of plants, shall be submitted for ENGINEER's acceptance at the site. These samples, if accepted, shall be planted and maintained as standards for comparison with plants furnished. F. Certified Report on Topsoil Analysis: The CONTRACTOR shall submit for acceptance by the ENGINEER a certified report by an approved analytical laboratory showing analyses of representative samples of topsoil proposed for use. The topsoil shall not be delivered to the site until acceptance is received from the ENGINEER. Acceptance OCSD 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPING Project No.6-17 02900-2 of the laboratory report does not constitute Final Acceptance. Topsoil shall be subject to rejection by the ENGINEER on or after delivery if it is found not to meet the requirements of the Specifications or does not conform to the laboratory test results. G. Guarantees: The CONTRACTOR shall provide a written guarantee to OCSD from the CONTRACTOR embodying the provisions of this Specification section. H. Qualifications of Professional Horticulturist: Submit information on the professional horticulturist that will be planting the plants and trees. The professional horticulturist shall have a minimum of 5 years of horticulture experience. 1.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. General 1. All plants furnished by the CONTRACTOR shall be true to type or name as shown in the Contract Documents and shall be tagged in accordance with the standard practice recommended by the Agricultural Code of the State of California. 2. All plants shall comply with federal, state and local laws and regulations requiring inspection for plant diseases and infestations. Inspection certificates required by law shall accompany each shipment of plants, and certificates shall be delivered to the ENGINEER. 3. The CONTRACTOR shall obtain clearance from the Orange County Agricultural Commissioner, as required by law, before planting plants delivered from outside the county in which they are to be planted. Evidence that such clearance has been obtained shall be filed with the ENGINEER. 4. All inspections herein specified will be made by the ENGINEER. The CONTRACTOR shall request inspection at least 24 hours in advance of the time inspection is required. Inspection will be required on the following stages of the Work: a. During preliminary grading, soil preparation, and initial weeding. b. When trees and shrubs are spotted for planting, but before planting holes have been excavated. c. When finish grading has been completed. d. When all specified Work, except the maintenance period, has been completed. e. Final inspection at the completion of the maintenance period. 5. Plants shall be subject to inspection and acceptance or rejection by the ENGINEER upon delivery to site at any time before or during progress of the Work based on: a. Quantity, quality, size, and variety b. Ball and root condition c. Latent defects and injuries resulting from handling, disease, and insects District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPING Project No.6-17 02900.3 6. Plants accepted at preplanting inspection shall still be subject to rejection during planting if found not to be in compliance with the Specifications. 7. Rejected plants shall be identified in an obvious manner, removed from the site and replaced with acceptable equals. 8. Plants shall have been grown in nurseries that have been inspected by the goveming authorities. Inspection of plant materials required by OCSD, county, state, or federal authorities shall be the responsibility of the CONTRACTOR, who shall have secured permits or certificates prior to delivery of plants to site. B. Contractor Qualifications 1. Comply with the testing agency qualifications specified in Article entitled"Topsoil" of this Specification. 1.6 CLEANUP A. Upon completion of all planting operations, the portion of the Project site used for Work or storage area by the CONTRACTOR shall be cleaned of all debris, superfluous materials, and equipment. All such materials and equipment shall be entirely removed from the Project site. Cleaning shall be done in a manner that will not result in any discharge of contaminated materials into any catch basin. B. All walks or pavement shall be swept or washed clean upon completion of each work,day. day. C. During the entire Contract period, plant containers that have been cut or removed from plant materials shall be removed from the Project site daily. 1.7 MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING PLANTING PRIOR TO FINAL COMPLETION A. General: The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for protecting, watering, and maintaining all planting and irrigation systems until Final Completion of all Work under the Contract. B. Watering: Trees, shrubs and groundcovers shall be thoroughly soaked after planting and provided with additional water at intervals as necessary to provide for good health and growth of the planting. C. The CONTRACTOR shall replace any materials or equipment it has damaged or that have been damaged by its employees or Subcontractors. D. Partial utilization of the Project by OCSD shall not relieve the CONTRACTOR of any of the requirements contained in the Contract Documents. E. All plants shall be maintained in a vigorous, thriving condition by watering, cultivating, weeding, pruning, spraying, and other operations necessary. No trees or shrubs will be accepted unless they are healthy and show satisfactory foliage conditions. F. All planted areas shall be cultivated at least every two (2)weeks and raked smooth, to present a neat appearance and additional mulch shall be added where necessary. OCSD 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPING Project No.6-17 02900-4 G. Maintenance shall include, in addition to the foregoing, cleaning, edging, repairs to stakes, wire, and wrappings, the repair of erosion, and all other necessary work of maintenance. Sidewalks and other paved areas shall be kept clean while planting and maintenance are in progress. H. Any sprinkler lines broken or disrupted by the CONTRACTOR shall be immediately repaired to proper working order,or be replaced and be acceptable to the ENGINEER. 1.8 FINAL INSPECTION AND WARRANTY A. Final inspection of all plantings will be made at conclusion of maintenance. B. Written notice requesting final inspection shall be submitted to the ENGINEER at least ten (10)days prior to the anticipated inspection date. C. Final Completion of the Work prior to warranty period of the Contract shall require satisfactory completion of all Work, including maintenance, but exclusive of the replacement of plant material. CONTACTOR shall obtain Final Completion of the Work by the ENGINEER in writing. D. Any delay in the completion of any item of work in the planting operation that extends the planting into more than one season shall extend the warranty period in accordance with the date of completion given above. E. The CONTRACTOR shall replace all plants not in a vigorous, thriving condition, which are noted at the end of the 1-year warranty period within seven(7)days. F. Plants used for replacement shall be of the same size and variety specified in the plant list indicated on the drawings. Plants shall be furnished, planted, staked, and mulched as specified. G. All Work done under this Contract shall meet the requirements of the Contract Documents as accepted the ENGINEER.The CONTRACTOR shall,without an additional expense to OCSD, replace any trees, shrubs, or plant material that dies or develops defects (disease, growth problems, failure to meet this Specification) during the 1-year warranty period. 1.9 MAINTENANCE AND WARRANTY FOLLOWING FINAL COMPLETION A. General: The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for a period of one (1) year after date of Final Completion of all Work under the Contract, for maintaining all plantings. Maintenance shall include all necessary plant or tree replacements, weeding, cultivating, fertilizing, pruning, controlling insects and diseases, re-guying, and performing all other operations incident thereto, as well as maintenance of the irrigation system specified in the Specification section entitled "Landscape Irrigation". The Work covered by the maintenance and warranty portions of these Specifications consists of providing all replacements of plants, labor, materials, equipment, and supplies and in performing all operations in connection with maintenance and warranty. B. All planting, plant materials, and irrigation systems required under this contract shall be in a condition acceptable to the ENGINEER at the end of the maintenance warranty period. C. All water required during the maintenance and warranty period will be furnished by OCSD. District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPING Project No.6-17 02900.5 D. The CONTRACTOR shall make all changes or adjustments necessary to the automatic sprinkler system during the maintenance and warranty period. E. The CONTRACTOR shall replace all dead or diseased plants during the maintenance and warranty period. F. All planting areas shall be fertilized during the maintenance and warranty period in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Fertilizer shall be applied per manufacturers written instructions on bag. Fertilizers applied to planting areas shall be cultivated into the top 2 inches of topsoil. The CONTRACTOR shall clean up and remove unused or waste materials from the site and leave the area in a neat condition, whenever it performs work during the maintenance period. The clean-up and removal shall be subject to acceptance by the ENGINEER. G. Final Inspection: The ENGINEER and CONTRACTOR shall make a final inspection at the end of the 1-year warranty period. Any plants and materials found defective at time of final inspection shall be replaced within a time agreed upon by both parties. If it is too late in the planting season for replanting,the replacements shall be made during the next planting season even though such planting may run beyond the maintenance and warranty period. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 GENERAL A. All landscaping materials for soil conditioning, weed abatement, fertilizing, or planting shall be first-grade, commercial quality and shall have certificates indicating the source of material, analysis, quantity, or weight attached to each sack or container or provided with each delivery. Delivery certificates shall be given to the ENGINEER as each shipment of material is delivered. A list of the materials used, together with typical certificates of each material, shall be submitted to the ENGINEER prior to the Final Completion of the job. 2.2 TERMINOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS A. Plants or plant material having characteristics not conforming to terms as defined will not be accepted. The terms "plant material" or "plants" refer to all vegetation, whether trees,shrubs, ground cover,or herbaceous vegetation. B. Quality refers to structure and form, as evidenced by density and number of canes and branches, compactness, symmetry, and general development without consideration of size or condition. Standard quality indicates the least acceptable quality. Plants shall be typical of the species and variety of good average uniform growth, shall be well formed and uniformly branched, and shall have the minimum number of canes specified, free from irregularities, or shall conform to minimum quality index. Where the number of canes is not specifically stated in describing this grade, the "American Standard For Nursery Stock", as adopted by the American Nursery & Landscape Association, shall apply. In this case, the number of canes and other factors for the appropriate classification under "quality definition" in the Horticultural Standards shall be the quality index. Plant materials below this standard will be considered "culls" and are not acceptable. Plants shall be nursery grown. OCSD 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPING Project No.6-17 02900-6 C. Specimen means an exceptionally heavy, symmetrical, tightly knit plant, so trained or favored in its development and appearance as to be outstanding, superior in form, number of branches, compactness,and symmetry. D. Size is the factor controlled by dimensions representing height or spread, or both, without consideration of quality or conditions. For standard quality, a dimension is given for height or container size, or a dimension is given for height as well as container size. E. Height is usually indicated with a tolerance. The smaller dimension is the minimum acceptable. The larger dimension represents the maximum permissible. The average dimension of all plants shall equal the average of the tolerance figures shown on each item. F. Condition is the factor controlled by vitality and ability to survive and thrive and be comparable with normal plants of the same species and variety in the vicinity, at the same season of the year. In addition, plants shall be free from physical damage or adverse conditions that would prevent thriving. Conditions also sometimes refer to state of growth, i.e., whether"dormant condition"or"growing condition,"and this state shall be comparable to plants of similar species in the vicinity or leaves, formation of buds, and the like. G. Cane means a primary stem that starts from the ground, or close to the ground, at a point not higher than 1/4 the height of the plant. H. Caliber shall be taken 12 inches above the finish grade or ground, as a guide, or where a dimension in trunk appears to form the head of the tree. I. Foliage line is maximum dimension in case of specimen plants. It measures from ground to lowest part of body of plant. J. Collected plants shall not be used. 2.3 TOPSOIL A. General: Topsoil shall be designated as Class A (imported), Class B (selected), or Class C (unclassified) as specified herein. The ENGINEER will determine the suitability of topsoil prior to use. Topsoil shall be transported from source to final position unless stockpiling is specified. B. Class A Topsoil: Class A topsoil shall be from a source outside the limits of the Project selected by the CONTRACTOR and in compliance with the requirements specified herein. The ENGINEER may make such inspections and perform such tests as deemed necessary to determine that the material meets the requirements. 1. At least fifteen (15) days before scheduled use,the proposed topsoil source shall be submitted to the ENGINEER for acceptance. The CONTRACTOR shall submit a written request for acceptance, accompanied by a written report of a testing agency registered by the state for agricultural soil evaluation, which states that the proposed source complies with these Specifications. Class A topsoil shall have the same relative composition and structure, a friable sandy loam character, and be free of roots, clods, and stones larger than 1 inch in greatest dimension, pockets of coarse sand, noxious weeds, sticks, brush and other litter. It shall not be infested with nematodes or undesirable insects and plant disease organisms. 2. Class A topsoil shall meet the following additional requirements: District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPING Project No.6-17 02900.7 a. Gradation Limits: Sand 50 to 80 percent, clay 20 percent maximum, and silt 30 percent maximum. The sand, clay, and silt gradation limits shall be as defined in ASTM D 422. b. Permeability Rate: Not less than 0.5 inch per hour, nor more than 2 inches per hour when tested in accordance with ASTM D 2434, California Test 220, or other approved methods. c. Agricultural Suitability: The topsoil shall be suitable to sustain the growth of the plants specified. C. Class B Topsoil: Class B topsoil is defined as material that is obtained from sources and in the quantities designated on the Drawings or in the Specifications and requires transport to the designated landscape areas. Such designated sources of the Class B topsoil may be within or outside the Project limits. The cost of stripping the surface of vegetation and debris at the designated locations and processing of material to a finely divided state, before it is spread, shall be included in the price for hauling and placing. D. Class C Topsoil: Class C topsoil is defined as soil found in place in the designated landscape area, including soil compacted in place as part of the earthwork specified for the Project. 2.4 SOIL FERTILIZING AND CONDITIONING MATERIALS A. Organic Mulch: Organic mulch shall be used as a planter mulch to suppress weeds. It can not be substituted as a soil amending or fertilizing compost. Organic mulch shall be a ground or processed wood product derived from redwood, fir, or cedar sawdust, or from the bark of fir or pine, treated with a nontoxic agent to absorb water quickly, and shall comply with the following requirements: Gradation: Passing Percentage (Percent) Sieve Size (minimum) 1/4 inch 95 No. 8 80 No. 35 30 Nitrogen Content(percent dry weight) Redwood 0.4—0.6 percent Fir 0.56—0.84 percent Cedar 0.56-0.B4 percent Fir bark 0.8— 1.2 percent Pine Bark 0.8— 1.2 percent Salinity Maximum saturation extract conductivity: 6.35 milliohms/inch at 77 degrees F. OCSD 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPING Project No.6-17 02900-8 Wettabililv When one (1)teaspoon of tap water is applied to 4 cubic inches (volumetric ratio of 1:15) of the air-dry product, the material shall become completely damp in a period not exceeding 2 minutes. Any wetting agent added shall be guaranteed nonphyto toxic at the rate used. 2.5 PLANT MATERIALS A. Plants shall meet requirements of the Contract Documents and shall be in accordance with the botanical names and applicable standards of quality, size, condition, and type. They shall be true to name, genera, species, and variety in accordance with reference publications. B. Plant names are defined in "Standardized Plant Names" and "Bailey's Encyclopedia of Horticulture" When a name is not found in either reference, the accepted name used in the nursery trade shall apply. C. Plants shall be marked for identification. Each bundle of plants and at least 25 percent of each species and variety of separate plants in any one shipment shall have legible labels securely attached before delivery to the site. D. All trees and shrubs shall be measured while their branches are in their normal position. Height and spread dimensions specified refer to the main body of the plant and not from branch or root tip to tip. No trees will be accepted with their leaders cut, or so damaged that cutting is necessary. E. All plants shall be symmetrical and shall conform to the size, age, and condition as specified on the plant list shown in the Contract Documents. Exceptions are as follows: 1. Plants larger than specified in the plant list may be used if accepted by the ENGINEER, but use of such plants shall not increase the Contract Price. If the use of larger plants is accepted, the spread of roots or ball earth shall be increased in proportion to the size of the plant. 2. Where caliper or other dimensions of any plant materials are omitted from the Plant List, it shall be understood that such plant materials shall be normal stock for type listed. F. Plants shall be of sound health, vigorous, and free from plant disease and shall be well branched, shall have full foliage when in leaf, and shall have a healthy well- developed normal root system. Cold storage plants will not be accepted. Plants that are sensitive to shock from elevation change shall be grown at elevations close enough to site to alleviate any plant damage due to such change for at least 2 years. G. Roots or balls of all plants shall be adequately protected at all times from sun and drying winds. H. Plants (indicated to be in marked cans, pots, or other containers on the plant list) shall have been grown in the containers for a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 2 years. Roots shall fill the containers but show no evidence of being or having been root bound. I. Trees shall have straight trunks and all old abrasions and cuts shall be completely callused over. In no case shall trees be topped before delivery. District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPING Project No.6-17 02900.9 J. Plants shall have been transplanted or root-pruned at least once in the 2 years. Plants shall not be pruned prior to delivery except as authorized by the ENGINEER. 2.6 STAKING MATERIALS A. Stakes for supporting trees shall be sound No. 2 redwood of uniform size not less than 2-1/2-inch-minimum-diameter wood posts of lengths specified in staking details. All knots shall be solid. Hose for covering wire shall be new or used black or green 2-ply fiber-bearing garden hose, not less than 1/2 inch inside diameter. B. Wire for tree bracing and guying shall be double strand pliable No. 10-gauge galvanized steel wire or vinyl-coated steel wire. C. Tree ties of other materials maybe used with prior acceptance by the ENGINEER. 2.7 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS A. Jute mesh shall be new and shall be of a uniform, open, plain-weave, flame-retardant mesh. The mesh shall be natural brown-tan and shall be made from unbleached single- jute yarn. The yarn shall be of loosely twisted construction and shall not vary in thickness by more than 1/2 its normal diameter. Jute mesh shall be furnished in rolled strips and shall meet the following requirements: 1. Width:48 inches, with a tolerance of 1 inch wider or narrower 2. Not less than 78 warp ends per width 3. Not less than 41 weft ends per yard 4. Weight shall average 1.22 pounds per linear yard, plus or minus 5 percent. PART 3- EXECUTION 3.1 GENERAL A. All plants and trees shall be planted by a professional horticulturist or under the direction of a professional horticulturist B. The landscape Work shall not be performed at any time when it may be subject to damage by climatic conditions. C. The CONTRACTOR shall carefully scale or otherwise verity all dimensions in the Contract Documents. Any discrepancies or inconsistencies discovered on the Plans shall be brought to the attention of the ENGINEER. Dimensions and plant locations shown shall be coordinated with the ENGINEER and final location shall be site oriented by the planter and the ENGINEER. D. In case of conflict between the plant list totals and total plant count of the Contract Documents,the CONTRACTOR shall provide the higher number of plants. E. Delivery of materials may begin only after samples and tests have been accepted by the ENGINEER. All materials furnished for the Work shall be not less than the accepted sample. OCSD 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPING Project No.6-17 02900-10 F. Substitutions for the indicated plant materials may be permitted pursuant to the Contract Documents G. The CONTRACTOR shall provide temporary fencing, barricades, covering, or other protections to preserve existing landscaping items indicated to remain and to protect the adjacent properties and other structures when they could be damaged by the landscape Work. H. The CONTRACTOR shall retain the services of a tree surgeon acceptable to the ENGINEER to repair damage to existing trees. Existing trees that are to be saved and that cannot be restored to full growth, as determined by tree surgeon, shall be removed and replaced with a new similar tree of 24-inch box size of the same species. I. A professional horticulturist hired by the CONTRACTOR shall remove and/or relocate landscape items such as trees, and obstructions as shown on Drawings or otherwise specified. J. Waste materials shall be removed from the OCSD property, and disposed of at a designated landfill unless otherwise noted. K. It shall be the responsibility of the CONTRACTOR to avail itself of any information regarding utilities that are in the area of Work and to prevent damage to the same. The CONTRACTOR shall provide protection to the utilities as necessary. L. Burning of combustible materials on the site shall not be permitted. M. The CONTRACTOR shall provide protection to structures, sidewalks, pavements, and other facilities in areas of Work that are subject to damage during landscape Work. Open excavations shall be provided with barricades and warning lights, which conform to the requirements of governing authorities, U.S. OSHA and the State of California OSHA safety requirements. N. Planting areas include all areas to be landscaped unless specified or shown otherwise. 3.2 SOIL PREPARATION A. The landscape Work shall not begin until all other trades have repaired all areas of settlement, erosion, rutting, etc., and the soils have been re-established, recompacted, and refinished to finish grades. The Work shall be subject to the ENGINEER's acceptance. B. Areas requiring grading by the landscaper including adjacent transition areas shall be uniformly level or sloping between finish elevations to within 0.10 foot above or below required finish elevations. C. The landscape Work shall not proceed until after walks, curbs, paving, edging, and irrigation systems are in place. The Work shall be completed to a point where the landscape areas will not be disturbed.The subgrade shall be cleaned free of all waste. D. During grading waste materials in the planting areas such as weeds, rocks (2 inches and larger) building materials, rubble, wires, cans, glass, lumber, sticks, etc., shall be removed from the site. Weeds shall be dug out by the roots. District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPING Project No. 6-17 02900.11 E. Soil amendments, seed, etc. subject to moisture damage shall be kept in a weatherproof storage place in such a manner that they will be kept dry. F. After removal of waste materials, the planting area subgrade shall be scarified and pulverized to a depth of not less than 6 inches and all surface irregularities below the cover of topsoil removed. G. Finish grading shall consist of. 1. Final contouring of the planting areas. 2. Placing 4 inches of topsoil over all areas to be planted unless shown or specified otherwise. 3. Tilling of planting areas. 4. After tilling, bring areas to uniform grades by floating and/or hand raking. 5. Making minor adjustment of finish grades as directed by the ENGINEER. 6. Removing waste materials such as stones, roots, or other undesirable foreign material and raking,disking, dragging, and smoothing soil ready for planting. H. Any unusual subsoil condition that will require special treatment shall be reported to the ENGINEER. I. Topsoil shall be uniformly distributed over all areas where required. Subgrade and topsoil shall be damp. J. Surface drainage shall be provided as shown by molding the surfaces to facilitate the natural runoff of water. Low spots and pockets shall be filled with topsoil and graded to drain properly. K. Finish grade of all planting areas shall be 1-1/2 inches below finish grades of adjacent pavement of any kind. L. Palms and other nitrogen-sensitive and salt-sensitive plants are exempt from any nitrogen-intensive fertilizing regimes including biosolids compost use. M. Jute mesh shall be installed loosely up and down the slope. The installed mesh shall fit the soil surface contour and shall be held in place by 12-inch-long, 11-gauge (minimum) steel wire staples driven vertically into the soil at approximately 24-inch spacing. Jute mesh strips shall overlap along the sides at least 6 inches. Ends of strips shall be buried into the soil at least 6 inches. Staples shall be driven into side overlap at 2 points per side overlap. 3.3 DELIVERY, STORAGE,AND HANDLING OF PLANT MATERIALS A. No plants other than the required samples shall be dug or delivered to the site until the required inspections have been made and the plant samples are accepted. B. Plants shall not be pruned prior to delivery except as accepted by the ENGINEER. OCSD 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPING Project No.6-17 02900-12 C. Plant material shall be planted on the day of delivery if possible. The CONTRACTOR shall protect the stock in a temporary nursery at the Project site where it shall be protected from sun and drying winds and shall be shaded, kept moist, and protected with damp soil, moss, or other acceptable material. Plants shall be planted within two(2)days after delivery. D. During planting operations, bare roots shall be covered with canvas, or other suitable materials. No plants shall be bound with wire or rope at any time so as to damage the bark or break branches. E. Plants shall not be picked up or moved by stem or branches, but shall be lifted and handled from the sides of the containers. F. Plants shall be lifted and handled from the bottom of the ball or container. Plants with balls cracked or broken before or during planting operations will not be accepted and shall be immediately removed from the site. 3.4 TREE AND PLANT LOCATIONS A. The CONTRACTOR shall locate and stake all tree and shrub locations and have the locations accepted by the ENGINEER before starting excavation for the same. The plant locations shall be observed, and their locations shall be adjusted as directed by the ENGINEER. B. No trees shall be located closer than 72 inches to structures and/or paving unless otherwise shown. Shrubs may be planted up to % their mature diameter to structures, paving or curbs. 3.5 PLANT PITS A. Plant pits, centered on location stakes, shall be excavated circular pits with vertical sides and flat or saucer shape bottom in accordance with the following sizes unless shown otherwise: 1. Tree pits shall beat least two times greater in diameter than the specific diameter of ball or spread of roots, and 6 inches below depth of ball or roots. 2. Shrubs shall be planted in pits or holes of soil two times the diameter of the root ball and installed at finished grade with a minimum of 6 inches of planting soil under balls of all plants. 3.6 PREPARED BACKFILL A. Planting pit and bedding soil shall consist of a uniform mix of topsoil, and biosolids compost that matches soil profile needs as determined by soil testing. B. Materials shall be thoroughly rotary-mixed on the site before placement. Mixing of materials in pits, bins,trenches or beds will not be permitted. 3.7 ROCKS OR UNDERGROUND OBSTRUCTIONS A. In the event that rock or underground obstructions are encountered in the excavation of plant pits,alternative locations shall be selected by the ENGINEER. 3.8 SETTING PLANT MATERIALS District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPING Project No. 6-17 02900.13 A. The soil shall not be worked when the moisture content is so great that excessive compaction will occur, nor when it is so dry that a dust will form in the air or that clods will not break readily. Water shall be applied if necessary to provide ideal moisture for filling and planting as specified. B. Plants shall be set in center of pits as shown in the Contract Documents. They shall be set plumb and straight, and at such a level that after settlement the crown of the plant will be two (2)inches above the finished grade. C. All shrubs shall be pruned to remove damaged branches. D. Planting soil around roots or balls shall be thoroughly compacted and watered. After planting, the soil in the shrub beds shall be cultivated between shrubs, raked smooth, and neatly outlined. Muddy soil shall not be used for backfilling. All broken or frayed roots shall be properly cut off. E. Trees and shrubs on slopes steeper than 6 to 1 shall be provided with watering dams or berms at least 6 inches high and 8 inches wider than planting pit (hole) unless specified or shown otherwise. F. Organic mulch amendment shall be added 1 / 2 cubic yard per 1,000 square feet. around the base of trees, in planter pits, and in and around shrubs that do not have a surrounding ground cover already presents. G. All trees shall be thoroughly watered immediately after planting. H. Remove all tags and labels when directed by ENGINEER. 3.9 STAKING A. Staking of trees shall be done immediately after they are planted. Plants shall stand plumb after staking. Staking shall be as specified unless shown or indicated otherwise. B. Trees of 2-inch caliper and over shall be guyed at points of branching with three wire guys spaced equally around and outside the perimeter of the ball. Guy wires shall be covered with rubber hose at the bark, protected by approved material at points of contact. Each guy shall be positioned below crotches and fastened to a 4-inch-diameter by 18- inch wood deadman, 12 inches below grade. One turnbuckle shall be provided for each guy. C. Trees of less than 2-inch caliper shall be supported by two stakes placed diametrically opposite at perimeter line of ball and to sufficient depth to hold tree rigid. Stakes shall be driven vertically and not twisted or pulled. Trees shall be wired to each stake as indicated on staking details. Trees shall be protected with rubber hose over wires at points of contact.All evergreen trees shall be guyed. 3.10 PRUNING AND MULCHING A. Each tree and shrub shall be pruned in accordance with standard horticultural practice to preserve the natural character of the plant in the manner fitting its use in the landscape design, as accepted by the ENGINEER. OCSD 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPING Project No.6-17 02900.14 B. All dead wood or suckers and all broken or badly bruised branches shall be removed by thinning out and shortening branches. Deciduous bare-rooted plants shall have not less than 1/3 of their respective leaf surfaces removed. All cuts shall be made just above a healthy bud. Pruning shall be done with clean, sharp tools. C. Cuts over 3/4-inch diameter shall be painted with approved tree paint. Paint shall cover all exposed cambium, as well as other living tissue. Paint shall be waterproof, adhesive, and elastic antiseptic; shall be free from kerosene, coal tar, creosote, or other materials injurious to the life of the tree; and shall be accepted before it is used. D. Plants shall be mulched with organic mulch after planting and cultivating have been completed. A layer of mulch materials, as hereinbefore specified, shall be spread on finished landscaping grade within all planting areas to a depth of 2 inches. The mulch around isolated plants shall be 6 inches greater in diameter than the planting hole. All shrub beds shall be completely covered with the mulch. District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPING Project No. 6-17 02900-15 OCSD 6 Trunk Sewer Relief LANDSCAPING Project No. 6-17 02900-16 o-b CAnON OF EISnxc MI15 OF LWDSOME IVI IRROMON MAINLINE DISTURBANCE (WORK y EXISTING MH-135 AR F. / REFIAC WIN NEW 60'MR. i Exlrnx PoC MVxuxE, SEWER NICNMENT FRO COxrInW MAINLINE PRO IN PEA PIECEE OR,F RLVD yQ� PA uWs, PRoiECT-w— E uRSF N / ➢ CONNECT MAINLINE DIRECTON LY LENSTRE EXIST PR OLD C TEMP, SEWER IPE CONNECT MAINLINE gflECRT DOWNSTREAM OF ME _ EXIST H-035 i F BYPASS PIPE NEW ROW SSTALL BACKRLO SOMBRE REMAIN PRO1EClE0 E MAIM NEW 60"MX. - - - — - _ f N PµtE ISnNG 1' OST ROW AND CONNECT TRENI _ - - / / OF THE E K WT MASTER VALVE AND CCNNECL i0 L, IF R VON BYPASS. IYPMl1 Q MANUFACTURER ER CABLE H SPECIFIED BY R _ - IRRIWPON HTPP55. 1Y1MCP1 16, 0 /_/ �' ,t11 J. �ETNL N NVFACTURER. CABLE FRALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN T M CONTROLLER. CONTACTESCOTT KYLE ROM ATAT RAINMASTER I-ED' LV2 /i +� FOR COORDINATOR WITH PROGRAMMING IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS SHOWN DEEMED CONTRACT CM COLTMNS / V R-569 NMH MID 5 CIFYCONERA C-2866. L M DRAWING �L 1EMP. SEWER BWASS / x0 R-5NS OF - ED IPMENT ]. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY G T �/' LOCATIONS OF ALL EOUIPYEM AND HEADS AND REPLACE IN KIND. / — - D IHIINE AN p WIRE ACTORSLEIAXBT i0 IFf L _ _ AND INDICATE E PLACE.RECORD DRAWINGS. 10 VERItt LOGnON _ Z - PAID INOIO4IE ON RECORD CMWINGS. T NEWPORT a STING IRRIGQgN OLD OlB ,TpH SSE. SHOYM pE16YID FROM fl1TNN9-WfpSCOPE ARCHITECTURE Itt COMPACT C-28R6. CM DgPNINPNO-A=369]-S. OAIEO 5-13-97. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY L L EWIPMENT AND HEADS AND REPLACE IN KIND, 0% LOCATOR OF _—- - ROW SEN / WP R DL�D _ ' - — gSNRRMcE (WOROQNDSCAPE / D t LOCA N OF EXISTING (1\ AREA LIMITS) - MASTER VOLV P IN D f o 0.m TEMP. S ER HNASS APE Din LIMITS OF LAND REPA HW0BE M� SRK LIMO EXISTING PROTE LAND FAME LOCATION OF N E%INLINC / / / _ 0 / CONRACTOR SHALL IRRIGATE IRRIGATION MAINLINE b / _ - AND IANMNx ORFA OF DISTURBANCE PROTECT IN PLACE Q / / - \ BY MUCK OR OTHER MEANS. M / / / POINTOFCONNECTION-CONTROLLER EXISRAS ER CENTH- CONTROL L SYSTEM TER IhR TON BYPASS IYPMAL I{? CCNTROWFP PROTECT IN PLACE CONTROIIIII IS ON ' SEE DELNL / -�� RNNMASTER CENTRAL CONTROL SY51EM E / 8 / / / CgJTAM$WII NYIE AT RAINMASTER (969) 212-8013 Hrz' / ROTEm IN PLACE VON OF BISTRO / IEYP. S \ REPAIR&L IRRIGATION LITERALS AND SPRAY HEADS THIS i i //!' / IRRIGAMN W 1NIGL N IRPROHOT MNNLINE. IR EARON MATERIALS AND iCOA HEOD-iO-HEOD SPACING. `4 PROTECT IN PLACE7FNP. SEWER SEE DETAIL N \ AREA i0 ORIGINAL CgIDIPON USING CITY OPPRWEO BURSTING PIT i / i BrvASS PIPE ®0 CONNECT TO ORIGINAL LATERAL WATER SOURCE RI UM11S OF LANDSCAPE ma or gSNRRWCE (WORK AREA EXISTED MNNUNE AND WIRE SLEEVES i0 REMAIN( PROTECTED IN PLACE, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION -' uMILS) \ AND INDICATE ON RECORD DRAWINGS. BE R ARMDENOTEDH FSISTxc vVNnrvc M"i' r✓ O AREAS ANNG rv0 y. IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS SHOWN DERNED FROM CALTPNIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE IRRIWPON SYSTEM AND ME CURRE' NT wATEREp 8! a CITY CONTRACT C-RPB6, CRY GNAWING NO R-Sfi9]-S, WTEp 5-13-9]. CCNIRM,TDt TRUCK. <M S.WRIER LOCMONS OF NL EQUIPMENT AND HEADS AND REPLACE IN KIND. FOR IRRIGATION DETAILS, SEE SHEET L5001 TEMP. SEWER BYPASS NORTH €3 RIPE FOR IRRIGATION NOTES m to oRIF NA 8q m SEE LEGENDS, L6001 SCALE:1°=2V OEWIG.EL BY --HERE XMRY MrygOf, ECixO. DISTRICTfi TRUNK SEWER RELIEF &17 gR KGEWFFHADOW 4Rmc a ORANGE COUNTY CHECIERM'� `® ;ateFa.n a e'w^"W SANITATION DISTRICT IRRIGATION PLAN G �GG PLAN SR 'ISSUED JN GYIIERLO L1001 �3 MA CE3GUPTICN GATE ORNNJAC INEg AWRA N ,I • .z.�� I I� ' f /�/II/////N�raiifafiiii•_i_i_iiiigCCC////!/OiC7CCCCCCCCCCCCI�CCCC .��__��rN. wI�//, 91 //// f—s, " S= � /� � w__._i____wwiii�5 _ f w_�HOC-•=�_ _ .� ��. tee..• =i I IG•fff_f/II/IIf//f///Iff•//IIIO�� ♦��±•o1fII/I/!�igllY/IY•IIf/fiSYL�YIYI/III/Y//Y/Yf/YI�Y�e��YF�, �MI����IIY��IA = /s-I ii I i/iiia�/%%�O//F9ifii/i/:�Y/%%%;1/ice► . _ `saw _ WA f/ fllw�.I/CC •ilia wwwwni .gr���rrc.s. -� rrr /Cwwfl� fi f �/4raa � r wii `� -___= a.�• F_ !3 f I �� _ of //// IIIIQ////JFw+'.��'d/F�I////i// ////�i A -------------- a __ ; i �icff p /j/p ////ffi///////� /// /////� ,aiiisf/ fffw.,w • II I �..%�%%iiiiANNI %4VOR �Me�ffiiii/O/ ` / ////G//I//!r / •C�II�•CIII /fC/ I'/ /// . wF s�r sir/v.•�s••iiiii/re.=_.�rf//�i FAN iii/iile�f/ffes/ : www�iw • 1• / ••1 C1I/ l�I♦•1.1•♦••/1••11••IY�/ii/ir.��ww ��0��_ O- aC_••�fl••111•iw_�www���w��wwwwwwww—w_-ww�p . Y♦iff♦r-�CII•��f,.___�i_ww_�w.res.___w��__�__ �C��ij%CC•� Hill rA _- . �� • • �� s,, TEMPORARY IRRIGATION SYSTEM NOTES: 2.7 ROTOR HEADS MAY BE EmIER RNNBIRD OR FORD. REFOR TO STANDARD IRRIGATION MATERV15 MC LIST BY CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PARKS DMSION AND MERRY WRH ME ENGNEER. 1, THE CONTRACTOR SHNL DESIGN/BUILD A TEMPORARY IRRIGATOR SYSTEM TO PROVDE 100%, BURY PLL LATERAL ONES ADENI TO ROW, INSTAL ALL STANDARD RISERS WITH PRO HGO-TO-HRD COVERAGE FEW ME NEW I(BE-PUNT PLANTINGS WITHIN ME ARRAS Of STAINLESS STEEL CLAMPS TO A /4 FORM STAGE BURIED A MINIMUM OF IS- INTO MADE FOR LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE USNRRWCE. CONTRACTOR'S WORK SHALL CONFORM TO APPLICABLE CODES. CRY ORDINANCES STABIMF USE DOUBLE SWING JOINTS AT ALL HEADS. (WORK AREA LIMBS) AND POLICIES, A 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN TO ME FOLLOWING STANDARDS 28 ALL SPRAY OR ROTATOR HEADS ADJACENT TO ROADWAY OR SUDERAING SHALL BE 7^ -UP HEADS, 12" HIGH FOR SPRAY/RDTAMN HEALS, HURT LATERAL LINES ADJACENT TO PANNE 2.1 CWiW.CiOi SHALL USE THE f%IBiINC WATER METER AND CONTROLLER AS SHOWN HEREIN SPRAY OR ROTATOR HEADS MAY BE EITHER BANKERS OR PERO,VERIFY HEAD MODEL WITH ENGINEER. INSTAL A11 STANDARD RISERS WITH PRO STMUZSS STEEL CLAMPS TO A SINGLE 14 ,EMUNG MH-IJC ON SHEET L1001, CONTRACTOR SHALL UPGRADE THE CONTRI TO ACHIEVE ME AMOUNT OF STAKE BURIED A MINIMUM Ci 12" INTO GRADE FOR STABILITY. USE DOUBLE SWING E VALVE STATIONS REQUIRED FOR IRRIGATING THESE ARM, FOR TECHNIM ASSWOUCE WIRI ME REBVR REBM AT ALL HAD$ 1 CENTRAL CONTROL SYSTEM EQUIPMENT OR OPERATION. CONTACT MR, SCOTT KYIf AT JOUNTS RAINMASIER, (949) 212-8013. 2.8 INSTALL IN-LINE CHECK NAMS AS NECESSAW TO PFFRR FUNOff INTO ME PAVED AREAS OR DRAPING CF THE MANLINE. All RISERS SHALL HAVE CHECK VALVES WITHIN THE RISER. _ CO CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE BLLL VALVES D AT BOXES PER DETAIL 1 L5002 Ai PpNT OF LINE 29 NL,WORK SHALL BE APPROVED SY THE ENORI CONTRACTOR SHAL PERFORM A COVERAGE E .Q / I' CONNECTION i0 EALVES, IRRIGATION MVNLINE AND AT 200' THERMALS ALONG THE AN OFT FOR SHUT-OFF VALVES. POINT OF CONNECTON H MAINLINE SHALL BE TOWNSMEN 4 SERIES COST IN ME PRESENCE OF ME ENGINEER OF ME ENTIRE SYSIEY, BEING flVH BY ME - MASNR VALVE AND FLEW SENSOR INFALARON, BALL VALVES SHNL BE MATCO ]54 SERIES CONIROI£R. NOT MWUPILY. o a FALL POPE HALL VA`hS. 2.10ING ARTOREAS STALL BORE UNDER AREA OF i B DISTURBUUEVARDANCE TO MSVSH IL BE MN ED NEW f_ 2,3 MAINLINE 5HALLL BE BROAND NUNELARGE , INUINE SHALL BE S SCHEAKED T If 40 FOR H 4 EBAR , A SU 2GEP5 WT MI ME EN IC PTHE IZ g F ME INTO BORING SHALL BE ENCASED WRHIN T ANO CUSS 315 T ANO URGER. MVNHIG DEAT BE SOAKED i0 GRADE LOCATION /4 REBM P SLEEVE THAT LL Pi OR WIRE RUNS THE SIZE OF ME DRAW B RIPE. SOW ME PIPEGGR GATEVFB T D SM- Bi M RKS LONG AND DEEP INTO APPROVED GRADE AT 8'-0' O.C. MAINLINE LOCATION SHALL BE INSTALLED FOR WIRE PANS. MINIMUM DEPTH SHALL BE BORING BELOW B AGGREGATE P HALL BE MARKED ON-GJUDE AND AP%ROVEO BY ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSWIALION, MNNHNE ME FOR THE ROAD. SLEEVES SHALL BE PM SCHEDULE 40. BORING SHP1L BE IN E - SHALL RE SIZED TO TAME INTO CONSIDERATION EIfVATON AND FRICTION LOSSES OVER WE LONG CONFORMANCE i0 ALL CITY CODES AND ORDINANCES, E RUN TO THE FARTHEST VALVE, SEE METAL 2/15CO2, 24 LATERAL NON-PRESSURE UNES SHALL BE STAGED PER NOTE 2.3 ABOVE. MATERIAL FOR \ �� LATERAL LINES MH ALSO MATCH NOTE 2.3 ABOVE. 1 2.5 ALL WIFE RUNS SHALL BE ENCASED WITHIN SCHEDULE 40 BROWNLINE PIPE OF A SIZE TO CON TOR SHALE ION AND INSTAL - E (CHUM ME MANUNE. TEN ALLOW FOR 2,6 NO WICK YCOUPLING VPLVES OF EWILL NECESRSNIY ALONG M5 MVNLINE PRU FOR NRE YEARAREA , SEEU TES IN �ED ND M I03 NTAIL 1 2.7 INSTALL FSAME CONTROL VALVES'WITHIN BOXES PER CETNL 8/L5001. VALVES SHALL BE E GRISHOID ON SERIES VAVfS, SIZE PER MAHUFACMREBS SPECIFICATIONS. USE RNNBIRD MST-D}uL SNAP TTE CgMECTOR$ WNH @PT-55 SNAP TTE GREEN. Oz `. 16 VALVE BOXES SHALL BE RECMGULAR FLAME 18' LONG % 12-MIRE % BY 12- DEPTH. / WFS F WORK ARGR HITS) L COMPACTOR SHVL DESIGN FOR AND INSTALL N TEMPO RNRY IRFIG4TIW FOR REPWIiEO ICE- -- PLANT WITHIN AREA OF USEVRPPNCE AND MAINTAIN AREA FOR ONE NDUC SEE NOTES, SHEET LION}. IXISIING GVARDWVL LOGIOH — J E W P O R T L V D. CONTRACTOR s DfBO AND u1 - MP SEWER BYPASS PIP POIURY IRMCA FURR REP IGE JAN - BE P WITH AREA 0 gS S. SH M BEMH_A AREAFA ONE YEAR, 5 HOMES. ES, E 003.3. = MH-Ifi5 3 BE w D BE H w PI- 10 Qy y O E vETI Y E @% NI F OKS 34F CNR F 5 a� aQ _ WAGER POINT OF LONN[OTON A IXSRNG _ 1 WATER METER IN iH15'APPWXG M. — �, F �' NSOLOCAPONOEIYUP ISRIBEING N 1H15 AREA EN DENOTES IXISIING PANTING�j�/7/7/7/7/7/7�� ALERTS HANHG NO a E� D Rt BIV= LLL111� ,NNX yBWArtvEI In ARE mAG�OR sHAt D D ws 'W OED NEW P' - FOR IRRIGATION NOTES Mucx NORTH TRIO pA Y-IRRfPanON FOR TED ICE , � FOR IRRIGATION DETAILS, & LEGENDS, " '° ° PUNi,WTHIN AR RBwcE Au0 NN SEE SHEEE 45001 SEE SHEET L6001 €� AREA ION SEE NOTES, SHEET VO N[cT NO. SCALE:1"=2(I' $� DPAwH v:DESIGNED RY .�>< a DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF " `°° ' ""°" RMC ORANGE COUNTY WIN°rv0 �" g TCTA,m _ 9°�I. a I , tza.d aI neDL IRRIGATION PLAN L1003 �r UxSET RE-ISSUED M - SANITATION DISTRICT pg EARN DESORIPnox DATE DRWN a - KEYNOTE LEGEND: / 0 EXISTING CORAL TREE-PROTECT IN PLACE SEE PLANNING NOTE #11/SHT L6001. O2 EX STING WASXINGiONN PALM-SOX. NUMBER. MOLE OFf-SITE, MAINTAIN AND MI15 OF W OM iDSCAPE REPL / DISTURBANCE WINKMITS A 29-CAR MAC AREA LI ) O} E%ISTING WASHINGTONU PALM-PROTECT IN PLACE. SEE PLANTING NOTE f11/SHT / 5 GALLON c L6001.' EXISTING MH-135 } _ © EXISTING TIPUANA TREE-DEMOUSH AND REMOVE FROM SITE. REPLACE WITH 2:1 REPIAC 'MIX NEW 60' MR 2 8 �i QU NFMT AT 35' BOX SIZE AS SHOWN ON PLAN, SEE PLANNING NOTE /II/SHT L6001. EXISTING TREES-PROTECT IN PLACE °RT BLV D } 1 9 ➢ © EXISTING SHRUB MASS-JUNIPER-REMOVE FROM SIZE, REPLACE JUNIPERS WITH / NE 54- A RED RHUS INTEGRIFOLN AT 24" BOX. AT 10 OG AS SHOWN. 5 N CO O EXISTING SH M MASS-ACACIA-DEMOLISH AND REMOVE FROM SIZE ALL EXISTING T ACACIAS AS SHOWN. RE-PUNT IN DAMAGED AREA AS SHOWN WITH ACACIA REDOLENS =NG PT � _ � i B � _ � ' � EXISTING MT-0025 ,`O}O - i EXISTING SHRUB MASS-AGMANTHUSDEMOLISH AND REMOVE FROM SIZE REPLACE WITH NEW EO• ML O EXISTING SHRUB MA55-BOUGAINVILLFA-DEMOLISH TO NM13 AND REMOVE FROM 511E 3 3 } } OO EXISTING SHRUB MASS-LAMPRANTHUS-DEMOVSH TO UMHS AND REMOVE FROM SHE 9 i \ EXISTING $XflVB MASS-AIYOPORUM- DEMOUSX i0 NMITe' AND REMOTE FROM SIZE G -ALA RED 3 10 / 9 3 - II EXISTING SHRUB MASS-PHORMIVM-DEMOLISH AND REMOVE FROM SITE WOO GALLON 3 13 EXISTING SHRUB MASS-TECOMARIA-DEMOUSX AND REMOTE FROM SIZE. RE-PIANT AS _ 52-BOLA W — - SHOWN. S G410N ]] LO GRE 16 E%ISNNG OROUNDCOIER MASS-GARPOBROTUS EDWS-DEMOU3H WITHIN LIMITS OF 10 42-MU W I GALLON — - DISTURBANCE PND REMOVE FROM SITE. RE-PIANT AS SHOWN. CAR- AG 0-KO CRE S6W LL N _ - 15 AREASEXISTING OF DISUJ WYER MASS-CE WHERE CA EGED TRUOLEOT IN PLACE OUTSIDE , } } 1 11 N °L° N EW P OR,�O- 16 EXISTING GROUNDCCWR MASS-IAMPRRAN HUDSA SAP Ci ABIUS-CONSTRUCNOPL O PROTECT IN STRU 41II�I 69-CAR MAC _ OUTSIDE AREAS OF DISTURBANCE REPLACE WHERE WAAGED FROM CONSTRUC➢ON. MESH ON NEW 5 GALLON _ 10 WE _ � 1] DEMOLISH AND REMOTE FROM SITE EXISTING CORAL TREE AND INSTALL 1-60" BOX A 10 CONPL LREE IN SAME LOCAPON. ED '2 O_AM SPE — _ \ \ i n / NE'Np ORT 6 \ 3 mZ LIMITS EXISTING MH�MI i0 BE / / 1 .'1 y y.... / DISTUft&NO ED(W ITS O / BE WRIT NEW 60' MX. }OOP I1 141 / ' t- ♦ \ 8 y R GALLON - A -ACA RED 6 3 CALL N / - !/ 3 it 3 �% / 5 GALLON W \ E _ 13GALLON RE \\3 89-ALO GRE - G a BURSTING PIT 98-CAR GALLON MAC \ \ \ LE 9-CAR MAC 2 5 GALLON LIMITS OF VNOSfAI+E 2 DISTURBANCE (WORK AREA LIMITS) 2 1 5 GALON ° R s9GALUON O a 9g NORTH ^V F TREE RELDWPON NOTE: 21 <$. y V TREES TO BE RENO THEM SITE AND REPLANTED MAY BE MOVED TO CSDPLANTb O P 2 97. CONTRACTOR TRACTOR SHAUL HIMSELF FAMILIAR WITH V TI THE USABLE AREA FOR ME STORAGE AND MAINTENANCE AVAILABLE AT xSCALE:1"=20' 9 12 THIS SIZE, SHOULD THIS AREA NOT BE SUFRCIENT FOR STORAGE AND GALLOVT LEGEND: FOR PUNTING DETAILS SEE SHEET . .HTENANCE OF ALL ON A BURTON OF MILES,THE CONTRACTOR SIWL @ SECURE TITHER MFA$OF HIS CHOICE 0.5 APPROVED BY OCSD FOR TX5 0O-ACA flE0—DENOTES PLANT MATERIAL, SEE LEGEND L5002 3m OAF PURPOSE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE A OUALIFIED BOX TREE MOVER, 5 GALLON DENOTES 512E WIMIH GROUPING NOTES & LEGENDSESEH SHEET L6001 [OUGFE° ypcyl. PT O. R Yes Kae:EEF xAwry 9° y. D18TRICT6 TRUNK6EWER RELIEF 6_17 "'° Ffi (� RMC ORANGE COUNTY IN°ND. 'Trc Nc. PLANTING PLAN �ff �AIW wa1<`A� .�a'%mW"` SANITATION DISTRICT L1004 y^ 1 PLAN SET RE aM ^- MAAI( DESCRIPTION DAIS DM_ MOM Iu.A_e 41 1 J J i 11 � ply, _1 GI 11 I • j 1 _.'r1.1i•1.11••r•••ra••11a1111rr 11 I�r1�r♦���ir���f1•�mr11•I�r111•a11r••1••rr•••♦•1••••••••1'f• f!•• 11 !1•IIN 1• ♦• •• 1 • • ••"1j"♦U"1 .1" r 11"N'.1-e_•• • rY-�- !. �a1�•IIIIr1�••r11♦rr1�1••!r•1•r•NI•EIfI•arr�or•♦• ,r♦•r•a1•, 6•-e• 1 1 •Ilar i�1♦!r•:3a�r r��1.1_• _ Ia♦i•IIN•• 111••••1•a• 1 • •• 1 �. ♦ m 1!f>r arir.�I ._N_! a1�0\ 1� INrerrSrrr pNN • •4rs•�•• s• • • ejlsriia .•r'k1 N:�ra �i • r'_INI. •• �••4 • a ar�• :r a ♦a�� �, •. •-. N 1 s >` aa -•e:'.•c.e- 1 er .•r._! . .: • • ir:•a •. •••♦•••• Nagec •sa • v f:- 11 . m •ra•1 of+�oirr�rr•m• • • • • • N• 1•♦,D••e••rlri♦�asr•rer•�:i.e.��e-ar>i.! _ •. •��rrrrlrr•1j•N ,• 1_♦ s �i� 1•r•1 • 11�A� _ v I ' .•' ♦'•1-••-N.r1"�i+r +r rI Yi`•1'N`r••• .! r N�♦/i"4 .� •� • r!III iiiiiiiiiiiiililllllililililllliiiii,illjliiiliiliillI - jai`•• a`r1`a1••v .1<ai<♦1 a• sa=:i=, •a .• • ,♦< 1.1•N•••rlj:♦ir111•I!a!r•11••!!•1 •••1 ! •r 1f a• a • • ♦ • f, _ �• _ r�ara•aar♦�rr �ea ♦asp••!•••oplar•Iri1•la�C••rrrr!�r:rrrN.••�el�•r.•-.•-.ra•rf�'rarrr=i•!rart`-.:�i�a5 �ice`�r•••r�•ei♦•••�•rlS:li'=rr♦rsrlNl•�Or�r��i�ixii':% � � �� _ :.f_r•s•�lalus,♦ !a • ,arT�♦•:4♦ara:•r•rr♦eagr�rrNa�9•r rr.Qr rr rfr�rrr••r•raN•MA--iiafrr rr•rr rr•rr••ri•♦i�rr'!�a�'ra ra r•i•r•••liari \1' �f•S�arw., ••_iNr•o�:�rr I � N..•�N••r�� • o•f N rf.A V =s• er•:.1..•._•_rfA_•e r•.!._q-••!me�ae�rs!.Ip rr aNa♦••rr••rN Nrrrr••rba e• '�"'�.••rwG a > s .. �; NYi• • NY/. !a••a .+ .•:••- :r•ii:9.�•.r•�.•:.•:.•:.a-:.•:••c•..fpc•. - .a.-.aaNs•.4•:Nr•.�!-•e N.:rmr•• =••= I e 1� DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF Ma, ORANGE COUNTY • �+s� fir"".� ., " - mow.. Ia••1�1 - �� - 1 I i.F • rliN •••N•N• i -_1. � C1� 'ri•rrbri1!>r•�!iia•_a:9 i i °s wl wlwl — - _ _ • m 1 1 l► s � Ruch �.�:� ,ham ��•.f.y . � , - MEET rrr;rm rr�3 illfl s1`yl f�• eI.R. rJ/� <�'�! • •rya IX ® -. . ®©� I►���RyRRfaj�m ..yN• "yr �y�` L'0=.���� 34��fR�y'a. . E�00 4• ,s•�f:f��rYlpfR'�pA�R• It" R !1)���RI►;► .,� rC°r�Wri4>iy'T /JIfRRRf�4k�aLlgflli � ��y!'.S •.•.. . ® "' '®®' �0 ��.>9`fiarr ti�/�R� �flB L, fi/� �i 1�.i. dR ,:'. •.�;a.::• e,..:�:.7�,a .. . ������ • ,ti,�� R s � I7 ® :. --®��0 �� s o,.rf• Ri, .i�'G=la' s:.a� �� ' J.�. e��• .�..C..�.r0•��yer�CR ay�.•�.°e�i��.. " �' �© ��.•Oio°•r••%�'r,rrr�M2leair-�$'.-• ra'r•ee•i^Z°iiii•i•°ne••rive y i°r���•�r w�:�•�����' � • ��0© ����i•BCis••ea'se°�irsii�i��a°ii°Q.3• ,�y°�1�-°.r•,-a •�<iiii�i..•,'r�..•re.44•e. �•ger�..:�yR�:•�����•��� I,-,. �®' �© a�swa+l�.•r>•a•::�.>4•a'•r••r���p'i2°�� ° •�qiq•°~'•�� ��•°a°�r••°"ac�•> .>:i i• . .•••r• •r••�bjir'� e��%�i!�j�%�i�� ®' �0 e, . _ aat.>•C.�+°ia•Oa>..+eir'si°'a•°ie i>•i arr W° `1•ri�• N.•JJJ. •j °�+ tre'��t<io��<i°..o°iia°h�i�ie�Cieis•�ra..-'•�•aa� e.••<�aas.'�a. . .. . i '�' °•°N••°m��riiii>risa�iii••aii�.•eepaai••b °i. a.ai°ii•ia•ii•.> .ei•rar.•< .i>°1i .>� . iia�. !,p — Q-- � ss..<�•,•aags>.<•r�.r� iii:°� ..�i� •asibai�i•°i•.> .arr°rr.<r �<°aaarai<r•r �.ri<a��.�ar�. . •....o • • rr .. rr �r O -_ _ . .err .r�< N•sr -.'; m WON i_ ee ee ye � skpm „ .� • . ICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF IF �� • 006 m mm= .Do A TFUL / FlNISH GRADE 845E MATERIAL IF LATERAL ONE i0 VRV6 STEP 1 EWIREO STRIPSON W WC MADE ADAPTER AROUNOD RIGID SPRANG MR HALF WIN WINES Ter ° NATIVE SURRO°NgNG A CMSCN INDUSTRIES PUPATE IS' THE LENGTH OF STRIPPED WIRES, SOIL EXSFING CUM ECIAGUWt VALVE BOX f1619-IR-ALB _ _ CLEAN SACKFUL SOIL .IT LOCKABLE UD 2- ABOVE FNlsx IXISTXG SDEWXK/HAMAXGPE GRACE. FBU9EE EXTENSIONS AS REO'0. STEP I SFEO Z =III- COMPACLEO TO MATCH %GVAigN FER CIVIL ENGINEER'S PLANS WATERPROOF WIRE CONNECTORS _ NATIVE SUflROVNgNG �p FOLD THE OTHER xVf OF THE RIGID _ SOIL LINES REPRESENT PIPE AND WIRE TO PROVIDE M LONG E%PAN51pi SPAWN, OVER TWISTED STRAND AS _ - 5pN0 BLCKFlLL PAWND BE REMOVED FROM C°NST UXUON AREA. _LEI - - WRLR SIICL SOH' = PIPES UNION _ PFCAT qi MAINLINE DNEHI AND - REMOTE LdITROL VALVE WRH PUPATE HANd£ A V STEP .l PIPE RE IN SEPARATE SLEEVE CONTROL/COMMON WIRES SHALL BE ENCASED IN INSERT THE TWISTED SAUCE INTO INDVIOUAL SLEEVES, WHICH SIWL THEN ALL BE PVC SCHEDULE AO HIPPIE$ M. TIE Y EI£CTRIGLL SPRING PRESSURE MVNUNE IN 51£EVE ENCASED WI1HN A URGE SCE. 90 CONOVN FOR N FLOW -PVL TM 90 DEGREE ELL COXHECIKIN AND TWIST DYER WIRE = OR NON-PRESSURE LATERAL PROTEGWN WRING CON- STRUCTON. pyC SCXEWIE 80 NIPPLE STANDS IN A CLOCKWISE - E DW. MNNLINE LATERAL AND R15ER STEP ] DREGMI . OR NOT PER PLANT IN SLEEVE rr LOCKING OR NOT PER PUx. �CONTROL/WM EXB WINES. 1W. - fi' MINIMUM LAYEfl OF PEA gEp 4 O h IXISTXG DARES CMVEL IX15TN° LITERALS INSERT TIE DIRECT OR INTO TIE B RX"C" MAINLINE GEL-FLLEO DIRECT bJRv 5%DCE KIT _ PUSH PAST TIE LOCKING FINGERS TO LL III ILL RED BRICK TYPICAL, 0 REWIRED STEP 4 SECURE CONNECTOR SIDE KBE. II PRESSURE MANURE S%5%T TUBE COVER -III-III-III- FmNG NSTALL PULLER% Fdt AFL WIRE SPLSTEPIOES. NO WIPE COMMON AND CONTROL WIRE$ STEP $ occuR WTfxOUT A PVULBOx, TP. PosmW y1 TIE WIRES THROWN ME TRENCHING 1 L _ IpTE; DEDCATE° INSULATOR CHANNELS AND NT$ 100 VRCE CONO 4 BPI IRRIGATION WIRE$ WITHIN A 2- SCR. 40 NFAi 9ROND GONIRQLER W SNAP INSULATOR TUBE COVER CLOSED, 2% PIPE CURVE VALVE NLI OX CWER IN 0- ]4' MIX, BYPASS IRPoUTpN MAINLINE'M1HIN TAIL LETTERS.MKAL 4"SCH AO SICUE STEP 5 RpTE., 13" NIGH PCP-UP ROTATOR, ROTOR OR SPRAY BYPASS UTIXK IRRIGATOR ONES WHICH ORE FOR USE WITH IN DW-B/DBR-G WIRE HAD MM RUBBER CAP. I- ARM FlNISH CONNECTORS ENCOUNTERED WITHIN A SOIL 40 SLEEVE TARE ME SIZE OF ME PIPE. 1-1/0' MINIMUM. FINISH GRACE C TYPICAL IRRIGATION BYPASS �1 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE a WIRE CONNECTORS �4� _ _ _ _ _ CURB OR MAKING H1$ VAR XIS 1DD N15 100 MAPLE% 90 DEGREE STREET ELL 00 NOT USE SIDE INLET PVC SCH-BO 90 DEGREE TIT ELL MVNUNE PIPING. SIZE MR LEGEND B' MINIMUM PVC SCHEWLE BO HIPPIE CARBON 9 TO- 10-48 ROUND GREEN PLSTO VIM BOX WITH MARIE% 9° DEGREE STREET p1 EXTENSIONS AS NECESSARY. TOP OF BOX AT 2-ARM FINISH GRADE, WIRE CONNECTORS, S-M R]0 FlNISH GRADE OR EQUIVALENT CARSCN INDUSTRIES PURPLE 10- BOUND FROIW$ENSCR AS RF{ERwCFD VALVE BO% /910-10-ALB WITH LCCNA9E RPKaATON UEADx Y, LID. 2" AWVE FINIAN MADE, FlNISH GRADE AT 2" ABOVE D ENUM GRADE a l QUICK COUPLING vOLVE WITH PURPLE BOX STRIP FHIFLD BRV° BALK Z'FPOI RUBBER CAP END OF CABLE RED BRIC". (4 MODIFIED) - CARBON INDUSTRIES 10" NC IATOLL UNE AND FIIDNG RU PE-B8COMMUNICATMR I CUBIC FOOT OF MA GRAVEL - ROUND VALVE BOX CABLE, US'MIN. URM NSpN LOOP - SEE MANUFACTURERS WAR HIPPLL L k910-10-ALB WITH LOCKABLE POP-UP HEAD / C SGECIRGARMS FOR DEVIL, _ =III LIQ 2' ABOVE FINISH GRADE. PRWICE IN 1- PVC SCH-40 CONWrt - I NS 100 MR G,THESE TWO SECTORS OXLY, - MASS 9D DEGREE STREET Eu MINIMUM 36' LONG PIGTAILS OF TO IN UME BI=E OF LOW SwWR 0000000 0 6'MINIMUM UYEP OF PG GRAVEL MASS 90 DEGREE STREET ELL �III NTH NO SPLICES EO SAL U.- BONN. PUSTI VALRO FLUOR ' = — CUBIC FOOT OF PEA GRAVEL BOX WITH LOCKABLE UO wux..N PIPING, s¢E PER¢cwo _ 1=1I _ = III= - RED BRICK, (4 REQUIRED) CONMON BRICK (4 TTp'0) B' BBA55 HIPPIE - ECK NGTURF AT I' BELOW TOP OF o W% VRI ARFp51 T BELOW TOP _ ATmw MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 10% - ENDURE PIPING AND HUNG - = = � WIRE RUNS UNDER MAINLINE OF BOX IN SNN°B/UWFNDCOVEN a FLOW SENSOR SIZE FROM NEAREST - AREAS IT THEN .1 FmxG. -_ —I—I—r PIPE E OR REDUCING COUPLER FROM r-1Tl —IiI EDGE OF FLOW SENSOR -I_HIHIHII f1 HIHI� yy IE HA v _ = ALLOW MINIMUM DISTANCE of sx 4u III— E R \ FLOW SENSOR SIZE Fl"U G De MAINLINE PIPING AND FLITTING = 9 WWNSTRUN VALVE, fIOING OR RpIE _ PIC MADE ADAPTER PEOUCINC COUPLED MGM EDGE HwT BRAND 'CC"ON COVER IN OF FLOW SENSOR - P'iN1 LTTERS, APICAL NOTE: " - = 8'MINIMUM —1 OF PG GRAVEL HEAT BRAND PB" ON - - COVER IN 2" TALL I RED BRICK TYPICAL 4 REQUIRED LETTERS, TYPICAL FLOW SENSOR DETAIL QUICK COUPLING VALVE Q\ PULL BOX a NTH US wo ITS mo _ �, aR IIIII I I III=III I I I 'mi.— I= I— I; BALL VALVE ('T1 �� Nrs 100 eGFUMM BY' KCDZEM. HARRY IECT NO. „ BD KOBZEPE. HARRY v DISTRICTBTRUNK SEWER RELIEF 6-17 o" GELnEOY� V R°"'"• " RMC ORANGE COUNTY WIRQ Q. Bo NaE WIFQpWBN1 IRRIGATION DETAILS PLAN THE-S$DED M , sSITE�O D°L SANITATION DISTRICT L5001 MARK DESCRIPTION HATE DRWN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SPECIMEN MEE. 'DUCKBILL' MET COVERS A 'DUCKBILL'TREE ANCHORS, OEPID MANURE ON-GRIDS SIZE FOR PER MANUF'S SPECIFl- CATIONS. PIµ 0 WHITE WIRE NOW FOR PEOESIRAN JUMBO0 MKIP Box CAPABLE OF PREPS, INES SR.RM. IN PST V°�Q m 0 COVERING D.C. 0d� V' NON-PEGESn21AN AREAS. SEE NOT: 0 0 FOIL WAFERING MIN, FINISH GUIDE 2' FµFN WAFERING BASIN, BE iFOX05 PRIOR i0 FUMING 1/2' WHILE PJC WIPE COVERS ROOT FALL - MR SHALL BE 1' —WRX ORGWIC TAIXE 0 g ppF FOR MIN. 75% OF WIRE LENGTH HIGHER THAN FINISH GRADE. PALM MEE, REFER TO PLAN MULCH CGYER. 1' MA%. DEPTH IN 0 O ® 0 BpCNFILL - MIENO ONLY PER plyM TiVXK i0 BE FLVMB ROOT BALL - i0P SHALL BE R' 0 SOILS REPORT FOR TREES AND Near LY ROPER THAN FINISH GRADE. oD�qp O SHRUI SEE SPECIFICATIONS. S LAYER OF MULCH PLANT TAB LOCATION. U ROOT CALL BPLKNLL - PMEND ONLY PER _ - COMMON BRICK Ai 0 00 SOUS REFIT, II FgCR CORNER Of 2' MULCH LAYER PER PLAN (I' ' DIM. SCH, 40 %T PEFF. 0 TRI WITHIN B451NI PIPE WITH CAP FOR VENTING FINISH GRADE. // BOX. BUSY 1'BELOW AND INSPEMN. FWO ($) PER $ UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL MADE FlNISN GRADE, MEE AT 1W DEC. APART. WiVP M4 REBAR % 14' LONG SFAI(ES B PIPE WITH FABRIC NOTE AT 6'-0' OL, AT ROM GOES OP _ WATER BASIN _ $GAFF/SIDES OF PLANT PIT VALVE. a III— III— NAIVE SOIL PIPPED AND FINISH FINISH GRADE _ _ — PRlgt i0 SETTING TREE Ill —GRACED SMOOTH. RAI of 100% WASHED - R. M1.gVE XVRNSTA L Z .. pJC TAG ApAP1ER. UXE 513E O _ W ]. PROVICE h INSTALL 11 GRAM III RASHER SAND, COMPACT AS _ _ AMIFORM TABLETS AS FER _ MOMS. NECESSARY i0 STABILIZE M4NUFACNRFRS SPECS. BALL VKVE. SIZE PER PIPE. III _ L I. SCARIFY G SIDES L PUNT PIT TREE. 4. USE TUCKBILL' O DTS FOR d�'.'RNm RFAONIttINNMSY WITH ,III. PRIOR TO GETTING PUN! GRAVEL SUMP UNDER 1REE5p 1flEE5 To 1'CLL.. %68 05 To 6' X ROOTBAL ONLY UPON RECOMMENDATION CAL. & /80 MS n) H-. AGO US ADMFER. LINE SIZE 8Y SOILS UBOPAiORY h 1% ROOi&LLL ryRCAL THREE MCHU RS/KR OVER PNM MEE ORANGE IS CMCNL. 11'CAL., REFER ID CERTIiIEO PVC UNION, LINE 512E ME CONTRACTOR SNALL BE SURE a AMORIST MR NUMBER OF CABLES FILE IGTOxSTWITHFIR�ES501NLS PER TREE. TESTS IF NECESSARY. TREE GUYING DETAIL C SHRUB DETAIL 7 PALM PLANTING DETAIL �B� "'S BALL VALVE ON{aRADE NTS VAR FITS 100 RTS 100 LOOSELY LOOP AROUND MEE IN LOLOEPOLE STAKE 'FlWRE 8"MANNER NNL TO STAKE PER TREE MUNK N PS RECOMMENDATIONS 'CINCX-TIE DETAIL APpRM ED STREET MEE. NJB'- ' SIZE. THIN CANOPY i0 wry, 0 REDUCE W1xD RE515TANCE, AS 0 wJy ® O NEEDED. REMOVE NUfl5ERY STAKE EDGE OF HAROSCPPE 0 ryV�d`Ya 0 G00 F AND. ORIENT THE TREE. PROPMEO SdL LANE Ai 0 P SECTION L£FUNK SPACED 8Y MAINLINE PIPE ON BOTTOM PLANT 1-1/21 SC 0 0 0 00 VRYRY STAKE TO THE ORM. FINISH GRADE SG BE 2"BELOW ® 2'%IB' DIAMETER LODGEPoIE PINE I' CpANTO CONTROLLER t.LLER FRp1 FINISHADJACENT EGGING EXISTING SLOPE ONE AL 2:1 0 �p SENSON i0 CONFROLI£R IF y �Li. Ci-32 'CINLX-TES' gpPLMABIE D MULCH COVER PER PUNS FUXT, PER THEE COMMIT FqE CONTROL AND AMENDED SOIL PER SOILS REPORT MULCH LAYER PER PLAN 10' MIN. DIAMETER BERM CAPABLE COMMON WIRE, OR MON- (1' MILK MAR OVER ROMBILLE C£HOLDING M GAL. OF WATER. pflE55VRE IAIERPL ONE UNDISTURBED IUTVE SOIL IMMEOLOTELY PRIOR TO BACNFlLL FINISH GRACE 0 REMOVE TIME MOM CONTAINER. S _ � III U 0 0 NTO RWi &LL- TOP $XVL BE I'-2' g PLANTING M,ULLY PP PRIT UNE KINKED - — 1 EDGE of NPADSCPPE ��o0���ppp Q0�0 NIGHER THAN FINISH GRADE. ROOTS. CO NOT BREAK OR SECTION �Wv� 0 oTHERNISE COMMIT R�FBVL o TUTTED CRJVXOCMER AND .OW 0 0 ANNUAL COLOR PLANTINGS - SEE BACKFILL - MEND ONLY PER T UNN MULCH (I' FILM. COMPACIEO SLAB-GRACE PLAN MR TYPE AND SPACING III 0 SOILS REPORT. BASIN). CLEAN AWAY FROM TRUNK. MULCH LOVER �{ S 04 ROM RN STAKE TO M PIPE L PUNT TABS PER NOTE BELOW FINISH GRADE. E _ _ ' W10THS. DRIVE 14' HMO RXSH A NOTE �! UNOIMNRBED IUIIVE SOIL IWKFlLL PEP SPECIFMATOXS, M1T S1'0Y WRY. TOM OF ROJT BLLL SHALL IXCAVATE A $OIL FLARE' BE LEVEL WITH SURROUNDING 12 {11 _ �ljAAIAEME iIO AND LOWER TUN 1. VY ONLY ON RESISTANT 3 E FlXISX GRADE O $! l SCAN SIPS OF PWJi PN = THE EIEVATIOI OF THE CONTAINER. -_II ON GRACE PIPE IF EXPOSED - \ PRIOR i0 SING PLANT. UNOIMMROM NAIVE SOIL 2. VERIFY LOCATOR DROP TO d' 2. ROVIOE k INSTALL 21 GRAM INSTAWTON. ROOIHAL AGRIFORM TABLETS AS PER - /l MOUND NATIVE $qL BENEATH MEE, OSGLL STAKES Ai 6'-O' MIX PLAN MWVFACIVRERS SPECS. _ ASSURE THE FOOTBALL CROWN IS O.C. NO AT ALL.PINTS. TURNS, 8 2'ABOVE FINISHED MOUND, OR VALVE / MUNN ELF B„ 12' DVMEIER AUGER HOLE LOCATIONS. .,I. ALL FREES. MINIMUM 6DEEP OR TO ' DEPTH AS APPRO BY ENGINEER UP PERCOLATION ON NFILL WITH SIZE SOL INSTALL de GROUNDCOVER PLANTING �1 ON IN roELDOMF OF RooF BALL y SHRUB PLANTING ON SLOPE �1 1. PUNT so' MIN. FROM Bca ON THE APPROACH Fo AN 1NTERSEcnox PIPE STAID TO GRADE (21 TR NTH VAR NR VAR ANO AN F10' THE ECM 0x THE ED AR/S MNtl81£. N3 100 yy 2. PWrt 10' MIN. FROM EDGE OF DRrvY APFRW4H. 3 PROVIDE CLEGURGUE UTILITY ADD Sn 4. PLANT 220'OMIN. FROM STREET LIGHT AND POWER PINCHES. C� F ], WHERE THERE M NO SIDE WAOA PLANT MEE IN THE CENTER OF PARKWAY. OS/r 6, PLANT MEE ]' MIN FROM CURB. E� TREE PLANTING DETAIL �\ �� xTs 100 Em ?� aPAGRANIN KCBZEFF. HARRY ECi ND. WRY: NOBJEFF. HARD n DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF Wwax06-17 VARDNIN. ) RMoj ORANGE COUNTY sg 07CLA acw iocnneEnmmpment IRRIGATION AND W THE-55MED UM _ °® �, sNE�aFI �N, SANITATION DISTRICT PLANTING DETAILS L5002 MARKI DESCRIPTOR LATE DRUMMOM PLANTING NOTES: IRRIGATION NOTES: 1 ALL WORK SERE CONFORM To anvurweEE WOES. T ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. TREE LEGEND . 2. ALL TREES SHALL BE STANDARD IN FORM, UNLESS OMER RISE SPECIFIED. SYMBOL BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE ON REMARKS WUCOLS 2. TGLA., INC. HASPI CONTRA THESE PUNS ILA ZE IT EINFORMATIONWITHTHESE SE PEAKS BY RMC WATER E EN"IRONMEM. IRE ER TIONCALIFORNIA,L CONTRACTOR SHALL FMIILIMY2E ITSELF WITH 1HESE %AI5 FOR ALL PERTINENT 3, ALL PUNT LOCATIONS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC, ACTUAL LOCATIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE A IHFORIMPON RELATING i0 SITE CIXISIRUCTON. ENGINEER PRIOR TO PWIIING. iIPUAHA ➢PU 11PU TREE 36" BO% 12 12-14' XICX % M 3. WE DESIGN IS DIAGRAMMATIC ALL PIPING,VALVES, AND OMER EQUIPMENT SHOWN WITHIN PAVED ARRAS OR 4. ALL PUNT MATERIAL WITHIN A SPECIES SHALL HAVE SIMILAR SIZE. AND SHALL BE OF A FORM (PPE) W-Y WIDE OUT OF PROPERTY BOUNDARIES ARE FOR DESIGN CLANFIGIgN ONLY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PLWIING TYPICAL. FOR THE SPECIES. ANY PLANTDEEMED UNACCEPTABLE BIT ME ENGINEER SHALL BE ARM WHERE POSSIBLE. NEVER INSTALL IRMEAT PROPERTY LINES ION OUTSIDE OF PR PNES OR TIMES INDICATED ON IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM TIE SIM ARM SHALL BE REPLACED WITH AN ACCEPTABLE PUNT PUN. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL ABOVE-GRADE IRRIGATIONEQUIPMENT WI1H ME ENGINEER OF LIKE TYPE AND SIZE AT TIE CONTRACTOR'S OWN EXPENSE. ANY MAMMAL APPEARING TO PRIOR TO INSTALMOµ ON CONTRACTOR MAY R REQUIRED TO MARE IRIS EQUIPMENT AT TOE CONTRACTORS BE UNHULMY, EVEN IF DETERMINED TO STILL BE ALIVE. SHALL NOT BE ACCEPTED. WE CA IINIA GI-1-11 DESERT BIRD OF PARA➢ISE 15 GLLLON 14 5'-8' HIGH % L OWN, COST. ENGINEER SHALL BE THE SOLE JUDGE AS i0 ME ACCEPTABILITY OF PLANT MATERIAL. (CAE GIL) 2'-3" WIDE 4, IFLD THAT E THE DIFFFEQURwG¢o x DIFFEERREN6CES IN CAME MIS, WHEN IT EXIST TMT IN MIGHT 5, WE CON RACTTORASHHALL IRRRIGATE CONVENTIONANT L SPR6AY BUDDROTORRIAARFAT50 THOROUGHLY FOR SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER LEGEND:(WUCOLS region 3,South Coastal) NOT WE DESTRUCTORS,IXISED AT THE TIME OF ME GNOMON DESIGN BRUMAIRE. SUCH OBS,RUCTIOBS OR APPROXIIMELY TWO TO THREE WEEKS, OR UNTIL WEED SEEDS ME GERMINATED. WHEN MERV. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE Ow WUCOLS DIFFEENCES SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY, IN ME EVENT MIS THEE IS SUFFICIENT WEED SEED GEMINATION. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A POST NOTIFICATION 6 NOT GIVEN, THE IRRIWTON CONTRACTORSHALL ASSUME MILERESPoNSIBIIIIY FOR ANY EMERGENT CONTACT HERBICIDE ACCORDING To THE MANUFACTURER'S DIRECTIONS. THE ACA RED ACACIA REWLENS 'DESERT CAPPET' PROSTRATE ACACIA 5 GALLON 445 L REV5KKI5 NECESSARY TO BRING ME SYSTEM TO A PROPER WORKING CONDITION TO THE DISTRICTS CONTRACTOR SHALL THEN WATT AN ADDITIONAL TWO (2) WEEKS TO ALLOW THE HERBICIDE i0 ALO GRE 'ALOE GRENADEN515 POPCORN ALOE 5 GALLON 299 L SATISFACTION, DISSIPATE, THEN PLANT AS INDICATED ON THE PUNS. WE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANY 5, ME IMPORT CONTRACTOR SHAL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ALL CONTROL WIRING, CONTROL WIRE RESIDUAL WEED FOLIAGE AND/OR ROOTS IN FLAT ARRAS. REMOVE WEED FOLIAGE ON SLOPE BAD SEA H^ATAR4 TARN' TOMPSCN WROTE BUSH 5 CALLON 34 VL B SLEEVES. LAMM AND MNNLINE PIPING.AND PIPE SLEENNO UNDER ALL PAVED AREAS PER PUN. PRIOR i0 AREAS LEAVING DEAD ROOTS INTACT FOR SOIL BINDING PURPOSES. BOLA LJ BOVGNNVILLEA 'U JOLU U JOLLA BOUGAINNLLU 5 WLLON 165 L PAVING. ALL PIE SLEEVING SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULEQ PIPE ME BE A MINIMUM TWICE WE ENCLOSED PIPE CAR MAC wissA IMCRGCAREA'pSw DIRECT GREEN CAMENT NAT& PLUM 5 OBJECT 261 M SIZE AND 1-1/2' MINIMUM DIAMETER, RUM TO DRAWINGS FOR SPECIFIC SIZES. R FINISH GRACES SHALL BE INSTALLED I-I/2" BELOW ALL PAVING, CURBS PNO BOXES WITHIN SHRUB/GROUNDCOVER AREAS. CU GRI CfANOMVS OflISEUS TOR. 'YIHKf£PoIHf CALIFORNIA LILAC 5 CALLER 20 VL 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE A STATIC PRESSURE AT THE POINT OF CONNECTOR OF THE EXISTING IRRIGATION ], FINISH SURFACE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF M'0 (2) PERCENT AWAY FROM ALL. BUILDINGS. AND ME PAR HESPEPALM PARVIRCQA EMBLEM RED YUCCA 5 GALLON 41 VL SYSTEM, VTOM ME BEER PRIOR AT TO TIME OF RECONSTRUCTION. REPORT ANY CHARGES IN AATIC MATCH CIVIL ENGINEERS FLOW LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. W.1 SPE IµPEANTHUS SPECTRUM TRALING ICE REMIT 1 GALLON 122 L PRESSURE 10 ME ENGINEER PRIOR i0 ANY CONSTRUCTION. MUH RIG MUHLENBERGN ROCKS DEER GRA55 5 CALLER 107 L ]. INSTALL ALL UST. ME AND EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN IN ME DUMB.AND LISTED ON ME CMS APPROVED 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL PUCE A R OMIC C TOP SOIL IN ALL PREPARED FOR E ARU5. W E RN4 CAL kNNNUS GUiOflNIG'EVE CASE DWMF COFFEEBERRY 5 GALLON 55 VL EQUIPNEM LIST. USE iEELCN TAPE ON ALL FW IMLE PIE MFFPOS ON ALL SPRINKLER SMNG JOINT AND CONTRACTOR SHALL HALE - AGRONOMIC SOILS LEST CNTRFOR SHALL TOM 5 F&T OF VALVE ASSEMBLIES. SOIL AT N LOCATIONS ON-SITE AT HIS EXPENSE, THE CRT RECMM NDAT MEN INSTPLL RHO IMF Po1u5 MEGRIFOW SUGIRBUSH 24" BOX 10 L SOIL LNG A ENE AND FERTILIZERS PER ME SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS OAFTERME TH4 INS T4WIpCHORTI51N5GX15 THATCHING REED 5 WLLpN 29 L 8, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ANDWI REQUIRE INCLINE SWING CHECK CALVES AND DRAINAGE TO IN-fl15ER CHECK REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS A CHANG ORDER FROM THEE DISTRICT. ANY ENGINANGE IN COSH DUE TO ME SOIL VALVES IF T NDTIMO EXIST OST REQUIRE CHECK VALVES TO AV01D BACK DRAINAGE TO GOER HGOS AND REPORTPRIORToWRK SHALL BE IMPORTED TIED TO THE ENGINEER WITH THE REPORT FOR EMITTERS AL NO ADDITON4 COST TO THE OWNED. TEST WI L RESIDES ME WORK, ALL I TO SUIT TOP SOIL STALL EXISTING SOILS. AN OILS SHALL 50115 CARPOBRONS EDUUS GE EUM FlA15 51,132 SF L TEST WITH RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO PORTING, C WITH EXISTING SOILS. SOILS SHALL BE ROOTED CR SPACING Ai lY O.C. 9. ALL IRRIGATION HEADS SHALL BE SET ffibENDICVVR TO THE FINISH GRPLE OF THE AREA WHEflE THEY ARE APPROVED BY ENGINEER PRIOR i0 IMPORTING, CONTRACTOR SHALL LIST SOURCE OF ALL MIANGUUR SPACING C INSTALLED IMPORTED SOIL ' AVAILABLE AT WATERNISE BOTANICALS. DON., CA (]60)-]28-2641 ID. REFER i0 SPECIFICATIONS FOR WBMTrtALS, INSPECTORS AND OIHw AP%ICME INFORMATMM. 9, ALL NEW SHRUB PLANTING ARRAS SHALL RECENT A MINIMUM MULCH COVER OF 2" DEPTH. GALLON LEGEND: 00-AW RED�DENOTES PLANEMAERVL SEE LEGEND It, WHERE SPRAY HEADS EXIST. IT IS THE INTENT CF THE DESIGN TO INCOME.POP-UP HEADS ADJACENT TO ALL 10, ALL PUNTING AREAS ON SLOPES OVER A:1 PND NEW SLOPES, STALL RECEIVE A JUTE MESH 5 GALLON DENOTES SIZE WITHIN GRJUPING PEDEURM AND VEHICULAR EWES. EROSION CONTROL MATTING. 12, CONTRACTOR SXVL FLUSH AND ADJUST ALL IRRN:ATON SYSTEMS FOR OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE AND To PREVENT 11. ANY PUNT MATERIAL NMM.ED BY THE CONTRACTOR AS DETERMINED BY WE ENGINEER SHALL WEER-SPRAY ONTO ROMWAYS OR PAVNG AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, MIS SHALL INCLUDE SEIfCTING ME EST BE PEPINCED WITH ONE OF THE CAME TYPE AND 512E AT ME CONTRACTOR'S OWN EXPENSE DE GEE OF ATS TO Hi WE EXISTING SHE CONNORS AND TO WORRIES WE ROW CONTROL AT UCH VALVE OR AS DENOTED BELOW: IRRIGATION LEGEND: TO DWAN ME OPTIMUM OPERAUNG PRESSURE FOR EACH VALVE SYSTEM. ERYTHRINA CAFFRA TREES - REPLACE 2:1 WITH 60" BOX SER IRA TREES SYMBOL MAKER. MODEL DESCRIPTION NOIILE RADIUS GPM PSI PATTERN DETAIL ➢PVANA TIPU TREES - REPLACE 2:1 WITH 24" BOX TIPEMA MERE 13, ME CONTRACTOR STALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO RUSH ME MAINUNE TO THE END OF ME MAINLINE. INCLUDING WASHINGTONN PCOUSTA PALMS - REPLACE 1:1 WITH 4W KIT WASHINGTONN ROBUSTA Q TOM Z04-12-03 IY POP-UP STREAM ROTORS 03 28 1.36 35 90 2 / L5001 ALL VALVE SOM"S OPERATED ON ME CONTROLLER FLUSH CUT ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS WHICH MAY HAZE (D TOM 306-12-03 03 28 2,04 35 1}5 SETTLED IN ME MNNLINE AND/OR UERAMS REMAINING FROM ME EXISTING SYSTEM. ALL VALVES OPERATED 12, ME CONTRACTOR SHALL BE AWARE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED MLRIES. AND SHALL BE Qi TORO WB-12-03 03 28 2.]2 35 1 W CN ME CCMRJMER SHALL BE OPERATED FOR THE ENGNER AND Cltt TO WORRY NO CLOGGING OF VALVES RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO ME UTILITIES AND OR ANY INJURY TO ANY PERSON. TOM 316-10-03 03 2g 4, 35 360 CR HODS HAS OCCUPIED DOWNSIRFLN OF WE CONSTRUCTION DUE TO THE NEW CONSTRUCTION AND CUTTING O D OF EXISTING PIPES. ALL CLOGGING OCCURING LATER CONSTRUCTION DO THESE RETURNS SHALL BE REMOVED BY 13. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ROOT BARRIERS NEAR ALL TREES THAT ARE LOCATED YWMN Q TOM 570Z-12P XF WM 12'PoP-UP ROTAIOfl KM ERN-TA 2Q5 1.22 40 HALF ME CONTRACTOR TO THE SATISFACTION OF ME ENGINEER AND Cltt EVE (5) MET OF MING OR CURBS. ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE -DEEP-ROOM OR Qa TOM 57OZ-12P XF CENT I PRN-TA 1 20.5 1 0,62 40 QUARTER 16 FLUSH OUT ALL UIERAL LINES FOR NEW SYSTEMS PRIOR i0 INSTALLING NOZZLES EQUIVALENT 24 DEEP PANELS. BARRIERS SHALL BE LOCATED IMMEDIATELY ABMACENT TO A TOM ]0Z-12P-15H- 12'POP-UP SPRAY HEADS 1ST 143 .II 40 HALF $ HARDSCAPE. ADULTS AND/OR FOUNDATIONS PER THE ROOT BARRIER DUAL ON THESE PLANS. WRSON 15. /S FOR EMNICAL ASSISTANCE WRH ME CENTRAL CONTROL SMTEM EQUIPMENT OR OPERATOR. CONTACT MR. INSTALL ER PANELS P MANUFACURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL 910-12B p' RWNp PWIIC CONTROL AND COMMON WIPE DULL BJ%. COL MINIMUM 24" OF BLOTO WIRE BOUND BOX. y ME CONTRACTOR USE ROOT BARRIERS OF A TYPE THAT COMPLETELY ENCIRCLE ME WOEALL. SCOT KYLE AT IUINMASIER, RUN) 212-6013. EXISTING GRISWOLD DW-PRV SERIES WROTE CONTROL VALVES. GIVE TO CITY STAFF, REPLACE WITH LIKE VALVE. 6 / LEON 14. PIECE ALL SHRUBS IN PUCE WHILE SILL IN COMNNERS FOR LOCATION MPRWAL BY CITY NEW 16, ALL My MAIHUNE, U1ElUL ANO HODS SHALL BE LOGTR A MINIMUM OF ICAO (2) MET FROM EDGE OF CURB PRIOR TO PIT EXCAVATION AND PWNIING, STAKE ALL TREE LOCATIONS FOR APPROVAL, W4 EXISTING MATEO 754 SERIES BALL VALVE, GIVE TO CITY AND REPLACE WITH LIKE VALVE. 3 / LWO1 AND PLAY OMR IMPERVIOUS SURFM.ES. O EXISTING BARRED N44 QUICK COUPLING VALVE, GIVE TO CITY AND REPLACE WITH LIKE VALVE. ] / L5001 I], ME SHAD IRRIGATION HEADS AND UEPAL PUNS SHOWN ON THESE BURNS WERE DERNED FROM £4 15, EACH SPECIES OF TIME MATERIAL SHALL BE ROM ME SAME NURSERY SOURCE IF POSSIBLE NEW LITERAL LINE, WE SCHEDULE M. SIZE AS SHOWN. 1 ED Y CALTRANS, Cltt CONTRACT N0. C-2666. Cltt ON R-569]-S. THE INTENT OF THESE / LWDI k "AS-BUILT' TO REDUCE MIXING OF VARIETIES AND GROWTH DIFFERENCES. -- DRAWINGS B PLANS IS �-- SOUND 2' MAINLINE. PROTECT IN PUCE AS POSSIBLE AND REPLACE WITH CLASS 315 IN UKE SIZE MEW DISTURBED. 1 / LOCH _ THAT ME CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING IRRIGATION WITHIN THE UNDSCARW LIMRS OF DISTURBANCE, 16. ALL PLANTED TREES INCLUDING BOX MY CONTRACTOR MANTAINED TREES SHALL BE EXISTING SCHEDULE b / CLASS 2W PVC NON-PRESSURE LITERAL LINES. REMOVE PER PUN AND REPLACE WITH 1 L5001 ADJUSTMENTS MAY WORK AREA BE NECESSARY MY EDUE IN KIND MVNIEWNCE CHANCES SSINCE ORIGINAL PONN DRAWINGS SEWfR COMPILE, ALL MEE SURE R NOT EACCCEPTABE AT THAT TIME FOR A PERIOD OF YEAR. EE REPLACED OAT OF ME SIZE AND RATIOSDIRICT THE S SCHEDULE b. / E NEW IRRIGATION INSTALATON SHALL ACHIEVE HUD-TO-HEAD IWR COVERAGE EVEN IF SYSTEMS REQUIRE DENOTED DENOTED A RMIONS TO LEAR MO MOVS TO WE SATSFACTON OF WE ENGINEER. O. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MyMNN THE PROJECT IN A HFKMY ANO WEED-EPEE CONDITION O EXISTING SHRUB MA55-AGA➢AMXUS-DEMOU5H AND REMOVE MGM SITE 1 18, pML ARRAS WITHIN MIS SCOPE OF WEEK PRE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF NEWPORi BEACH, FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR. 19,CONTRACTOR SHALL IRRIGATE AND MNMATN ALL IRRIRI —.1. EY S. INCLUDING TEMPORARY SYSIS ON WE I8. GUY ALL TREES WITH 2 INCH CALIPER AND URGER. TREES SMALLER THAN 2 INCH GLIPR O EXISTING SHRUB MASS-BOUWINVILLFA-DEMOLISH i0 LIMITS MID REMOVE ROM SITE NEW CEPLANT WIMIN ME AREAS OF DISTURBANCE FOR A ffµ00 OF SHE YEAR. SHALL BE STAKED. OO EXISTING SHRUB MASS-UMPRAMHUS-DEMOLISH TO LIMITS ME REMOVE FROM SIIE j 19. ALL AREAS WITHIN THIS SCOPE OF WORK PALE MAINTAINED BY ME CM OF NEWPORT BEACH. 11 EXISTING SHRUB MASS-MYOPORUM- DEMOLISH TO LIMITS AND REMOVE ROM SITE F 12 EXISTING SHRUB MASS-PHORMI.M-DEMOLISH AND REMOVE FROM SITE KEYNOTE LEGEND: Q3 EXISTING WASHINGTONN PAIM-PROTECT IN PEACE, SEE PUNTING NOTE f11/SHT 13 EXISTING SHRUB MASS-TECOMARIA-DEMOLISH AND REMOVE ROM SITE. RE-PUNT AS o' EXISTING CORAL TREE-PROTECT IN PEACE, SEE PLANTING HOE M#11/S L6001. LOW, SHOWN. yR © EXISTING TIPUANA MEE-DEMOLISH AND REMOVE FROM SITE. REPLACE WITH 2:1 _ gQ O2 EXISTING WASHINGTONIA PALM-BOX. NUMBER, MOVE OFF-SITE, MAINTAIN AND QUARTµ AT 36' BOX SIZE AS SHOWN ON PWI, SEE REAMING HOE NI I/SM 4 DISTURBANCE AND RECOVER FROM SI E. ESPUNT AS SHOWN WITHIN TIMES OF REPLANT FROM. `$-P F 3O EXISTING WASHINGTONIA PPLA-PROTECT IN PUCE. SEE PLANTING NOTE (I11/SM ® EXISTING TREES-PROTECT IN PIECE 5 AREAS N OF DIISTURBGROUNDCNCE, REPLACE WHRETUS DAMAGEDSMGM-PROTCONSTR CTION T IN PEACE OUTSIDE 6001. F © EXISTING SHRUB MA JUNIPER-REMOVE ROM SITE, REPLACE JUNIPERS WITH 16 EXISTING GROUNDCOKR MASS-UMPFMIDIUS SPECTPBILIS-PROTECT IN PUCE SF 4O EXISTING TIPlON4 TREE-DEMOLISH AND REMOVE FROM SITE. REPLACE WITH 2:1 RHOSRHOS IAT NIEGRIFOLIA AT 24' W%, AT 10' OA. AS SHOWN, OlT51DE ARRAS OF DISIERBANCE, REPLACE WHERE DAMAGED FROM CONSTRUCTION. QUANTITY AT 36" BOX SIZE AS SHOWN ON PLAN, SEE FEMURS NOTE d11/5M LM01. ]O EXISTING SHRUB MASS-ACACIA-DEMOLISH AND REMOVE ROM SITE ALL EXISTING Oj DEMOLISH AND REMOVE FROM SITE EXCEEDS CORAL TREE AND INSTALL 1-6W BOX AgCIAS AS SHOWN. RE-PUNT IN DAMAGED AREA AS SHOWN WITH ACACIA REDDENS CORAL TREE IN SAME LOCATION. nR 'LOWBOY'. PROJECT S„Y °Y KORIIfF HARRY ' RMC CI NO DMWNED :KOEER HARRY gs a DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF 6-17 a. CHECKEMII VARCNIN. JOE .d ORANGE COUNTY DRAWING NO I xc A , _ _ a�fentl Wmnon'^Wnt IRRIGATION & PLANTING ffOF �, SURE= F°°"° SANITATION DISTRICT L6001 r PUN SET RE-$SUED JM NOTES AND LEGENDS Og MARK DESCRIPTION DATE DRWN 4O Page intentionally blank. 1136054.1 Appendix D - Cultural Report for the District 6 Project 1136054,1 Page intentionally blank. 1136054.1 DALY■ &ASSOCIATES 4486 University Avenue, Riverside,California 92501 (951)369-1366■dalv.rvrsdePsbcelobal.net July 11, 2015 Pat Maxon Director of Cultural Resources BonTerra Psomas 3 Hutton Centre Drive,Suite 200 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Re: Application of Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure Impact 3.4-1 of the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Orange County Sanitation District Collection System Improvement Plan Dear Mr. Maxon; Daly&Associates has completed an investigation of the built-environment resources located within the area-of-potential-effect(APE) associated with the construction of the new Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) Project No, 6-17, District 6 Truck Sewer Relief Project line as required under the Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure Impact 3.4-1 of the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Collection System Improvement Plan (June 2007). (Exhibits 1 and 2) Mitigation Measure Impact 3.4-1 requires the evaluation of resources of sufficient age discovered within the Project APE that will be impacted by Project Activities. OCSD has found that the sewer trunk line located within the APE was constructed in the 1950s and under Section 15064.5 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)the built- environment resource appears to have reached sufficient age to be evaluated for significance as a potential historical resource. Daly&Associates performed a study to identify any potential historical resources that may be impacted by implementation of the proposed project, and to facilitate initial environmental compliance of the project under the provisions of CEQA. The investigation consisted of a windshield survey of the project area, research into the historic development of the area, and a review of individual property information available from OCSD. The purpose of this study is to ascertain if there are any built-environment resources in the APE that may be associated with the lives of persons important in our past;that were associated with any important patterns or events in local,state or national history; or that were constructed or designed by important individuals, and that would suffer a substantial adverse change as a result of the proposed project. OCSD Project No.6-17 BonTerra Psomas Page 2 of 8 r FQ,� C a NEWPORT BEACH / n " I•' ioT ,. ,o.a.:uwarrw.naom.�a• b�v Nw.pul•s� Project Site Exhibit 1 ww fYgac!N• &fl,Die6rct6T kS.R .(PR d ®Iw PSOMAS 14 -Y+3Y T LIE' Tu ' �y A � N� ��•t` ILJ Sensitivity Map Exhibit 2 _. 1 a OCSD Project No.6-17 BonTerra Psomas Page 4 of 8 Project Description: District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief 106-171 This project would increase the capacity of the District 6 Trunk line, which serves the cities of Costa Mesa and Newport Beach.The existing 3,700-foot sewer pipelines range from 12 to 18 inches in diameter and extend along Pomona Avenue in Costa Mesa and along Newport Boulevard to Pacific Coast Highway in Newport Beach. The removal and replacement of the existing District 6 Trunk Sewer pipelines would require a trench 4 feet wide and 14 feet deep. Trenches would be braced using a trench box or speed shoring. The active work are along the open trench would extend about 5 to 10 feet to one side of the trench and 20 to 30 feet to the other side, allowing for access by trucks and loaders. The minimum construction right-of-way would be 25 feet;the maximum construction easement would be 50 feet wide. On narrower residential streets, road closures and parking restrictions might be imposed during construction periods to facilitate traffic flow around construction areas. Construction work in intersections might necessitate closures when the construction precludes safe traffic or work conditions. Major sewer connections could require several days of uninterruptible round-the-clock activity. Staging areas would be necessary along the construction routes. Construction equipment and materials would be held in parking lots, vacant lots, or segments of street lanes that are temporarily closed. Staging areas would be selected to minimize hauling distances and long-term disruption. Removed pavement and excavated soil and pipes would be hauled offsite and would be disposed in accordance with applicable state and local regulations. Imported backfill would be delivered to stockpiles near the open trench. Once the new pipeline is in place, backfill would be placed in the trench, and the streets would be compacted and paved in accordance with state and local building codes. Description of the built-environment resource In the early history of Orange County, cities and towns located near large bodies of water or strong rivers were still discharging their mostly untreated sewer waste directly into the natural resources. This was a large cause of water pollution and created "dead" waterways. The practice of dumping sewage was not only harmful to the environment, but was a wasteful use of water. Leonard Metcalf and Harrison P. Eddy wrote the seminal textbooks on the "modern" treatment of sewage in 1914 with their three volume discourse American Sewerage Practice. Those books were followed by Sewerage and Sewage Disposal in 1922. Metcalf and Eddy included in their teachings the possibilities of the reuse of waste water, and presented the techniques for the "cleaning" of waste water for reuse. The water that was final product of the techniques developed in the 1920s was primarily left to drain naturally back to surrounding waterways or as groundwater. By the 1930s engineering systems were developed to drive the water, under pressure, directly back into the local water OCSD Project No.6-17 BonTerra Psomas Page 5 of 8 table thereby "recharging" a communities own water resource. Once treated, the water appears to have been injected back into the water table under pressure, and also by natural filtration in the treatment lagoons. According to the history of the OCSD, District 6 was formally organized under the County Sanitary District Act of 1923 in 1947. (orange County Sanitation District: History. http://Www.ocsd.COM/about-ocsd/general-information/history) Per sheets 4 and 5 of the engineering drawings of Sanitary Trunk Sewers OCSD District No. 6, dated 1952,the pipeline and manholes were constructed of pre-cast concrete units with cast iron manhole covers. While the manhole covers with the OCSD Sewer would have been cast using a custom mold,the iron covers and the concrete pipes were common components of a 1950s sewer line. (http://www.sewerhistory.org/grfx.htm) (Exhibits 3 and 4) a Exhibit 3: Manhole cover from District 6 Trunk Sewer line, Ohms Way,Costa Mesa. OCSD Project No.6-17 BonTerra Psomas Page 6 of 8 Exhibit 4: Engineering drawings of components of District 6 Trunk Sewer pipeline e 4N I f - $ �g i a ll-r _£ws — �001o0$y,gs °ja tl • S.S Cb• •�� 0r OCSD Project No.6-17 BonTerra Psomas Page 7 of 8 Methodoloev The research involved with this investigation included a review of the information available from the OCSD including copies of drawings, research into the historic development of the area, and a windshield survey to evaluate visible aspects of the existing District 6 Trunk Sewer pipeline for historical significance and integrity. The Directory of Historic Property Data for Orange County maintained by the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) was reviewed to ascertain if the District 6 Trunk Sewer pipeline in the APE had been previously evaluated. The sewer line located in the APE has not been evaluated for listing in the National Register of Historic Places,the California Register of Historical Resources, or as a historic resource in the City of Costa Mesa or Newport Beach. Assessment of Project Impacts CEOA defines a substantial adverse change as physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of a historical resource would be materially impaired.The significance of a historic resource is materially impaired when a project: Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of a historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for, inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources. The treatment of sewage treatment and construction of water reclamation systems is associated with community planning and development issues that came to the forefront in the early twentieth century when the results of uncontrolled dumping of waste products in rivers and oceans began to negatively impact the human settlements located in close proximity to bodies of water. It was becoming apparent that the dumping of waste was not only offensive in sight and smell, but that the untreated waste was literally killing the biosystems that were dependent on fresh water and salt water environments. Engineers specializing in water resources and sewage began to publish instructional handbooks and technical texts to assist communities on how to construct a system that would breakdown waste products that could be reused as fertilizer, and not foul the local water systems. Not too many years later, it became apparent, especially in the southwestern states,that all water should be considered a valuable resource and reused in the local community. Before water was injected back into the underground water table, "cleaned" water was sent back to open waterways, or left to evaporate. The pipelines of the District 6 Trunk Sewer are constructed of precast concrete and metal components commonly found in almost every city in the United States. They are considered ordinary and ubiquitous built-environment resources that are subject to routine maintenance, OCSD Project No.6-17 BonTerra Psomas Page 8 of 8 repairs, and improvements. The District 6 Trunk Sewer pipelines have not been found to be associated with any important event or person in Orange County or California. The District 6 Trunk Sewer pipelines are merely one of many conduits in the ODSD system whose sole purpose is to carry waste material, and the specific segment within the APE does not appear to present any innovative waste management engineering techniques. Conclusion Based upon the windshield survey of the built-environment resources in the project area, and a review of the engineering drawings of the components of the District 6 Trunk Sewer pipelines, it does not appear that the proposed project would result in a significant adverse impact to any identified or eligible historic resources. In accordance with Mitigation Measure 3.4-1 of the Final Program Environmental Impact Report of the Collection System Improvement Plan for OCSD,the District 6 Trunk Sewer pipeline has been determined not to meet the criteria necessary to be identified as a historical resource as defined by 14 CCR§4850, PRC§ 21084.1, 14 CCR § 15064.5(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act. We hope the information within this letter will prove to be helpful as you continue through the environmental review and entitlement processes. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions. Sincerely, Pamela Daly, M.S.H.P. Principal/Architectural Historian / / PSOMAS Cultural Resources Assessment OCSD District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project (No. 6-17), Newport Beach, California Prepared for Adam Nazaroff Project Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Prepared by BonTerra Psomas David M. Smith 2 Executive Circle, Suite 175 Irvine, California 92614 T. 714.444.9199 F: 714.444.9599 September 2014 { i Balancing the Natural and Built Environment W W W.Peomu.com OCSD Disttict 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Pmjecl(No.6-17) TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page NADBInformation Sheet........................................................................................................S-1 ManagementSummary...............................................................................................................2 1.0 Undertaking Informationlintroduction...........................................................................1 1.1 Contracting Data ...................................................................................................1 1.1.1 Regulatory Setting.....................................................................................1 2.0 Project Site ......................................................................................................................4 3.0 Cultural Setting ...............................................................................................................4 3.1.1 Prehistory...................................................................................................4 3.1.2 Ethnohistory...............................................................................................6 4.0 Methods ...........................................................................................................................8 4.1 Cultural Resources Records Search—SCCIC......................................................8 4.2 Native American Heritage commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File Review.........8 4.3 Site Visit ................................................................................................................8 5.0 Results.............................................................................................................................9 5.1 Records Search.....................................................................................................9 5.2 Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands Inventory........................10 5.3 Site Visit ..............................................................................................................10 5.3.1 Sensitivity Map.........................................................................................10 6.0 Mitigation.......................................................................................................................10 6.1 Mitigation.............................................................................................................10 6.1.1 MM 1: Cultural Resources Monitoring.....................................................10 6.1.2 MM 2: Site Recording..............................................................................11 6.2 Regulatory requirements.....................................................................................11 6.2.1 RR 3:Human Remains............................................................................11 7.0 Certification ...................................................................................................................11 8.0 References.....................................................................................................................12 TABLES Table Page 1 Cultural Sequence for Orange County..............................................................................6 2 Cultural Resources Studies That Included a Portion of the Project Alignment.................9 3 Cultural Resources On or Within One-Half Mile of the Project Alignment.........................9 R:mrgaoia=D(aDsnuooscuwmMw aeo Rapd4091214.do i Tewe of Contents OCSD Disttict 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Projecl(No. 6-17) EXHIBITS Exhibit Follows Page 1 Project Site........................................................................................................................4 2 Sensitivity Map................................................................................................................10 ATTACHMENTS A Cultural Resources Records Search (SCCIC) B Native American Consultation (NAHC) R:�orso(a )A.uooscuwmMw aeo Rapd4091214.aoax 11 Tewe of Contents OCSD Dlsttict 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Pmjecl(No.6-17) CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT OCSD DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF PROJECT (NO. 6-17) NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA By David M. Smith September 2014 Submitted by: BonTerra Psomas David M. Smith 2 Executive Circle, Suite 175 Irvine, California 92614 (714)444-9199 Submitted to: Adam Nazaroff Project Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 USGS Newport Beach 7.5 Minute Quadrangle, Unsectioned BonTerra Psomas Project Number: 30CS000500 Key Words: Orange County Sanitation District, OCSD, USGS Newport Beach 7.5 Minute Quadrangle, Newport Boulevard, Newport Bay R:mrgeom=D(acs)A.umscuwreiwwm,eeo Repd4091214.d o s-1 NADB Information Sheef OCSD Dlsttict 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Pmjecl(No.6-17) MANAGEMENTSUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE The primary goal of this project is to provide an engineered solution to the wet weather capacity issues that currently exist with a reasonable level of confidence that a sewage spill will not occur on the 6-17 sewer during a ten-year return interval storm event. This will be performed by providing a recommended up-sized design for the Lower Portion of this sewer. The Mid and Upper Portions do not require an increase in hydraulic capacity, the Mid Portion does have structural and corrosion issues that are affecting the hydraulic capacity. These portions will require rehabilitation or replacement. A cost-effective solution must be determined so the service life of the 6-17 sewer may be extended by 30 years. An engineered access solution shall also be provided for existing manhole number BPT0165-0000. Significant items include drawings, specifications, schedules, cost estimates, completed permitting, public outreach, traffic control, sewage bypassing, and temporary odor-control system design for use during construction. BonTerra Psomas was contracted to conduct a cultural resources investigation for the sewer alignment to determine if any existing cultural resources might be impacted during future modifications to the pipeline. This report documents the results of that study and includes a sensitivity map depicting the relative sensitivity of the pipeline alignment for potential impacts to recorded or unknown cultural resources. DATES OF INVESTIGATION BonTerra Psomas initiated the project on August 4, 2014, by conducting the records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton (Attachment A). The Native American Heritage Commission was notified of the project on August 22, 2015. Notification letters were mailed to nine tribes on August 25, 2014 and the project area underwent a vehicular windshield survey on August 21, 2014. This draft report was submitted to the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) on September 10, 2014. INVESTIGATION CONSTRAINTS The entire route of the trunk sewer is obscured by modern elements of the built environment, consisting primarily of asphalt paving and concrete driveways and slabs. The sewer is at least 60 years old and should be considered historically sensitive. MITIGATION MM 1: Cultural Resources Monitorina Section 21083.2(i) of the CEQA Statutes and Section 15064.5(f) of the State CEQA Guidelines provide for the accidental discovery of historical resources during construction. Based on the fact that prehistoric, historic, and modern peoples made use of the project alignment and surrounding areas, it is not unlikely that previously undetected cultural material and unknown archaeological sites could exist beneath pavement and other modern structures. Therefore, it is recommended that a qualified Archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archaeologists (NIPS 1983) and Native American Tribal Monitor(s) of the local Juanefio and/or Gabrielino tribal groups (identified by the Native American Heritage Commission [NAHC]), who have historical ties to the general area monitor excavations in sensitive sediments associated with the project. R:mrgaoia=D(=)A. oscuwmMa aec R e91214.d= S-2 NADa Information Sheef OCSD Dlattict 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Pmjecl(No.6-17) In the event that cultural resources are exposed during construction, the archaeological monitor shall have the authority to temporarily halt construction in the immediate vicinity of the discovery while it is evaluated for significance; if this occurs, construction activities could continue in other areas. If the discovery is determined to be significant, additional work (such as data recovery excavation) may be warranted. A Registered Professional Archaeologist should, at minimum, supervise any monitoring activities. Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit and/or action that would permit project site disturbance, the Contractor shall provide written evidence to the OCSD that the Contractor has retained a qualified Archaeologist to observe grading/site disturbance activities and to salvage and catalogue archaeological resources, as necessary. The Archaeologist shall be present at the pre-grade conference; shall establish procedures for archaeological resource surveillance; and shall establish, in cooperation with the Contractor, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to allow the sampling, identification, and evaluation of the artifacts, as appropriate. If the archaeological resources are found to be significant, the Archaeologist shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the City and Contractor for exploration and/or salvage. These actions, as well as final mitigation and disposition of the resources, shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Director. Based on their interest and concern about the discovery of cultural resources and human remains during project grading, a Native American Monitor shall be retained to observe some or all grading activities. MM 2: Site Recordina The sewer is estimated to be 60 years old; minimally, it should be recorded on a standard Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 primary record form. Prior to any construction activities that could impact the sewer, an evaluation pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines should be accomplished to determine if it is eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources. REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS RR 1: Human Remains In accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are found, the County Coroner shall be notified within 24 hours of the discovery. No further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the County Coroner has determined, within two working days of notification of the discovery, the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are or believed to be Native American, s/he shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento within 24 hours. In accordance with Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code, the NAHC must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the most likely descended (MILD) from the deceased Native American. The MILD(s) shall complete their inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The MILD would then determine, in consultation with the property owner, the disposition of the human remains. With implementation of the mitigation program summarized above, potential impacts to archaeological resources would be reduced to a level considered less than significant. DISPOSITION OF DATA This report will be filed with the Orange County Sanitation District, the Project Applicant, BonTerra Psomas, and at the SCCIC at California State University, Fullerton. All field notes and other documentation related to the study are on file at BonTerra Psomas. R:mrgeom=D(=]A. oscuwmMa aec R e91214.d= 5 3 NADa Information Sheef OCSD Dlsftict 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Projecl(No.6-17) 1.0 UNDERTAKING INFORMATION/INTRODUCTION 1.1 CONTRACTING DATA 1.1.1 Regulatory Setting This section contains a discussion of the applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, and standards that govern cultural resources and that must be adhered to prior to and during construction of the Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD's) proposed District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project. Federal and State regulations are included, as it is possible that both California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) regulations would apply. The report is intended to satisfy the requirements of (1) the CEQA statutes (California Public Resources Code §21083.2) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations [CCR] §15064.5); (2) Section 106 of the NHPA (36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 800, Protection of Historic Properties); and (3) a review by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) relative to a possible Clean Water Act (CWA)404 Permit for the proposed project. Federal Cultural resources are considered during federal undertakings chiefly under Section 106 of the NHPA of 1966 (as amended) through one of its implementing regulations (36 CFR 800) and under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Properties of traditional religious and cultural importance to Native Americans are considered under Section 101(d)(6)(A) of the NHPA. Other federal laws include the Archaeological Data Preservation Act of 1974, the American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA) of 1978, the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979, and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1989, among others. Section 106 of the NHPA (16 United States Code [USC] 470f) requires federal agencies to (1)take into account the effects of their undertakings on any district, site, building, structure, or object that is included in or eligible for inclusion in the NRHP and (2) afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) a reasonable opportunity to comment on such undertakings (36 CFR 800.1). Under Section 106 of the NHPA, the significance of any adverse effect on a cultural resource is assessed and mitigation measures are proposed to reduce the impacts to an acceptable level. Significant cultural resources are those resources that are listed in or are eligible for listing in the NRHP per the criteria listed at 36 CFR 60.4 below. The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association and that: (a) Are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or (b) Are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or (c) Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of installation, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or (d) Have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. R:w,gecis=D(=]A. oscuwmMa eeca ee1214.d= 1 Guttural Resources Assessment OCSD Dlsltict 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Projecl(No.6-17) State CEQA requires a lead agency to determine whether a project may have a significant effect on one or more historical resources. A "historical resource" is defined as a resource listed in, or determined to be eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) (California Public Resources Code§21084.1); a resource included in a local register of historical resources (14 CCR §15064.5[a][21); or any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant (14 CCR §15064.5[a][3]). Section 5024.1 of the California Public Resources Code, Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines, and Sections 21083.2 and 21084.1 of the CEQA Statutes were used as the basic guidelines for the cultural resources study. Section 5024.1 of the California Public Resources Code requires evaluation of historical resources to determine their eligibility for listing in the CRHR. The purposes of the CRHR are to maintain listings of the State's historical resources and to indicate which properties are to be protected from substantial adverse change. The criteria for listing resources in the CRHR were expressly developed to be in accordance with previously established criteria developed for listing on the NRHP. Section 15064.5(a)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines states that "[g]enerally, a resource shall be considered by the Lead Agency to be 'historically significant' if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources" (California Public Resources Code §5024.1), including if the resource: A. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage; B. Is associated with lives of persons important in our past; C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. The lead agency shall concurrently determine whether a project will cause damage to a unique archaeological resource (as defined in California Public Resources Code §21083.2[b]) and, if so, must make reasonable efforts to permit the resources to be preserved in place or left undisturbed. Section 21083.2(g) of the California Public Resources Code defines a unique archaeological resource as an archaeological artifact, object, or site about which it can be demonstrated that without merely adding to the existing body of archaeological knowledge, there is a high probability that it meets any of the following criteria: 1. It contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions and that there is a demonstrable public interest in that information. 2. It has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type. 3. It is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person. To the extent that unique archaeological resources are not preserved in place, mitigation measures shall be required (California Public Resources Code §21083.2[c]). R:�ocso(=)A. oscuwmMa aecR e91214.d= 2 Guttural Resources Assessment OCSD Dlsfticl6 Trunk Sewer Relief Pmjecl(No. 6-17) Using the information outlined above, the first level of evaluation is to determine whether a resource on a site is a historical resource and/or a unique archaeological resource that would be considered eligible for the CRHR and, therefore, significant. Impacts to significant cultural resources that affect those characteristics of the resource, that qualify it for the CRHR, or that adversely alter the significance of a resource listed in or eligible for listing in the CRHR are considered a significant effect on the environment. Impacts to cultural resources are considered significant if a project (1) physically destroys or damages all or part of a resource; (2) changes the character of the use of the resource or physical feature within the setting of the resource that contributes to its significance; and/or (3) introduces visual, atmospheric, or audible elements that diminish the integrity of significant features of the resource. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the eligibility of 11 sites on the project for listing on the CRHR and the NRHP. City of Newport Beach The City of Newport Beach has adopted archaeological guidelines that govern the identification and evaluation of cultural resources and are used to guide the development or redevelopment of lands in the City. The discussion below is adapted from the City Council Policy Manual Guidelines. The archaeological guidelines, Policy K-5, adopted on January 13, 1975, amended on January 24, 1994, and corrected on March 22, 1999, and amended on September 27, 2011 are summarized below: A. The City shall, through its planning policies and permit conditions, insure the preservation of significant archaeological resources and require that the impact caused by any development be mitigated in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. B. The City shall prepare and maintain sources of information regarding archaeological sites and the names and addresses of responsible organizations and qualified individuals who can analyze, classify, record, and preserve archaeological findings. C. If determined to be necessary by the Planning Director, it shall be the responsibility of a landowner or developer prior to the commencement of land development to cause the proposed site to be examined to determine the existence and extent of archaeological resources. The examination shall be by qualified observers, approved by the City. The observers shall prepare and submit to the City a written report describing findings and making recommendations for further action. The report shall discuss both positive and negative aspects of the effects of the proposed development on archaeological resources. The report shall be considered as part of the CEQA review process and, if appropriate, the recommendations shall be included as mitigation measures and conditions of approval for the project. D. Based on the report and recommendations of the observers, the City shall take such steps as are necessary to assure that any findings or sites are recorded, preserved and protected. These steps may include requiring the landowner or developers to incur reasonable expenditures of time or money, encouraging the involvement of appropriate volunteer or non-profit organizations or acquisition of R:mrgeomocso(=)A. oscuwmMa aecR e91214.d= 3 Guttural Resources Assessment OCSD Dlstnd 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project(No.6-17) the sites by public or private agencies. Provision shall be made for the deposit of scientifically valuable archaeological materials which are removed from the site with responsible public or private institutions. In all cases, the City shall seek responsible scientific advice and make the necessary decisions consistent with the public interest. 2.0 PROJECT SITE Exhibit 1 shows a portion of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)7.5-minute Newport Beach, CA quadrangle, which depicts the specific location of the project alignment. Generally, the sewer follows Newport Boulevard northward from the Pacific Coast Highway turning slightly northwest at Orange Avenue until it crosses Superior Avenue then turns north at 16'^ Street. From there is follows an alley, then Ohms Way. It enters an industrial complex via a driveway and exits midway turning right and ending at Pomona Avenue. 3.0 CULTURAL SETTING 3.1.1 Prehistory Archaeologists and ethnologists have long pondered over the cultural sequences that occurred before Spanish contact. The two most currently accepted schemes are those proposed by Wallace (1955), who interpreted the prehistory of coastal Southern California through temporal horizons, and Warren (1968), who viewed cultural differences not as temporal distinctions, but as local traditions. Wallace (1955) saw four temporal horizons along the Southern California coast: Early Man, Milling Stone, Intermediate, and Late Prehistoric. Early Man Horizon Spanning the period from the end of the Pleistocene to approximately 8,000 years before present (YBP),' archaeological assemblages attributed to this horizon are characterized by large projectile points and scrapers. The limited data available suggests that prehistoric populations focused on hunting and gathering and moved about the region in small nomadic groups. Milling Stone Horizon Characterized by the appearance of handstones and millingstones, this horizon tentatively dates to between 8,000 YBP and 3,000 YBP. Assemblages in the early Milling Stone Horizon reflect an emphasis on plant foods and foraging subsistence systems. For inland locales, it has been assumed that grass seed exploitation formed a primary subsistence activity. Artifact assemblages include choppers and scraper planes, but generally lack projectile points. The appearance of large projectile points in the latter portion of the Milling Stone Horizon suggests a more diverse economy. The distribution of Milling Stone sites reflects the theory that aboriginal groups may have followed a modified, centrally based wandering settlement pattern. In this semi-sedentary pattern, a base camp would have been occupied for a portion of the year, but a small population group seasonally occupied subsidiary camps in order to exploit resources not generally available near the base camp. Sedentism apparently increased in areas possessing an abundance of resources available for longer periods of time. More and inland regions would have provided a seasonally dispersed resource base, restricting sedentary occupation. ' "Years Before Present"assumes that 1950 is"present,"so in this case 8,000 YBP would be 6,050 BCE. R:mrgaomocso(acspwooscuwmMnaec ea 491214.d= 4 Guttural Resources Assessment 4 - - - Project Alignment ,r,i -1 � - :-L 01 J 11 10 I40 I a, �e 1 et = t Sr pm't H,,ht. > - ' i a j P9� ti IL ell Lighl 33 Liam r,= r t".• `"� a P k eA - NEWPORT BEACH " , poh � eay;. Ne ` PP�r vak Sou¢e:USGS75M We Qwd.,Il Neyporteeach Project Site Exhibit 1 OCSSD Project No. 6-17, Distract 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project w{ }E z,000 L000 o 21000 p �( Feet PSOMAS 1-11-111. Ill R11 .V I0 JW01 mr it emwi✓Men 11-S I. OCSD Dlsftict 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Pmjecl(No.6-17) Intermediate Horizon Dated to between 3,000 YBP and 1,350 YBP, the Intermediate Horizon represents a transitional period. Little is known about the people of this period, especially those of inland Southern California. Site assemblages retain many attributes of the Milling Stone Horizon. Additionally, Intermediate Horizon sites contain large stemmed or notched projectile points and portable mortars and pestles. The mortars and pestles suggest that the aboriginal populations may have harvested, processed, and consumed acorns. Neither the settlement-subsistence system nor the cultural evolution of this period has been well understood due to a general lack of data. It has been proposed that sedentism increased with the exploitation of storable food resources (acorns); the duration and intensity of base camp occupation increased, especially toward the latter part of this horizon. Late Prehistoric Horizon Extending from the year 750 to Spanish contact in 1763, the Late Prehistoric Horizon reflects an increased sophistication and diversity in technology. This is characterized by the presence of small projectile points that simplified the use of the bow and arrow. In addition, assemblages include steatite bowls, asphaltum, grave goods, and elaborate shell ornaments. Use of bedrock milling stations was widespread during this horizon. Increased hunting efficiency and widespread exploitation on acorns provided reliable and storable food resources. These innovations apparently promoted greater sedentism. By contrast, Warren's (1968) cultural traditions were more restricted spatially. Warren's scheme accounted for the cultural variability particularly evident within Wallace's late Prehistoric Horizon. Warren's traditions include the San Dieguito, Encinitas, Campbell, Chumash, Shoshonean, and Yuman. The San Dieguito tradition occurs within Wallace's Early Man Horizon, but is restricted to San Diego County. The Encinitas equated to Wallace's Milling Stone, but was longer in time, encompassing Wallace's Intermediate Horizon. Warren saw no new tradition developing in northern San Diego and Orange Counties during this time period. The Campbell and Chumash traditions are farther north in Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties. In Los Angeles, Orange, and North San Diego Counties, the Shoshonean Tradition began about 1300 YBP and represents the intrusion of Shoshonean speakers from the interior (Warren 1968). In contrast, the Yuman Tradition in southern San Diego County, just as the Chumash Tradition to the north, is thought to have developed from previous local traditions, whereas the Shoshonean Tradition is the result of intrusion into a previous tradition (Mason 1991:95). Koerper (1981) and Koerper and Drover (1983) have taken the horizon system proposed by Wallace and have applied it more specifically to the prehistory of Orange County. Koerper (1981) and Koerper and Drover (1983) adapted Wallace's four horizons using artifacts and associated radiocarbon dates from two Orange County sites: CA-ORA-64 and CA-ORA- 119-A. The authors argued that the transition between the Milling Stone and Intermediate Horizons was marked by the appearance of the mortar and pestle. The primary projectile point type changed from the Milling Stone "Pinto Basin"to the stemmed and side-notched forms. The beginning of the Late Prehistoric Period occurred roughly with the appearance of the smaller "Cottonwood" points, suggesting the introduction of the bow and arrow, and also with the abundance of shell beads and ornaments; the use of steatite for pipes, bowls, and ornaments; and the emergence of arrow shaft straighteners. Pottery may or may not appear at the end of the late Prehistoric Period or the Historic Period (Koerper and Drover 1983). R:mrgama=D(=]A. oscuwmMa aecR e91214.d= 5 Guttural Resources Assessment OCSD Disffid 6 Trunk Sewer Refie/Project(No.6-17) Mason and Peterson (1994) have proposed subdividing Wallace's Milling Stone Horizon into three subdivisions; the Intermediate into two subdivisions; and the late Prehistoric into two subdivisions. These temporal subdivisions are based entirely on radiocarbon age determinations that correspond to some degree with changes in settlement (Mason and Peterson 1994:58). In contrast, they note that temporal subdivisions traditionally have been defined on supposed differences in cultural content or traits as presented by Willey and Phillips (1958:22). As shown in Table 1, Mason and Peterson found little difference in the cultural content of their three Milling Stone subdivisions. TABLE 1 CULTURAL SEQUENCE FOR ORANGE COUNTY Cultural Period Radiocarbon Dates Paleo-Coastal Period PC Prior to 8000 YBP Milling Stone Period MS1 8000 to 5800 YBP MS2 5800 to 4650 YBP MS3 4650 to 3000 YBP Intermediate Period INTt 3000 to 2300 YBP INT2 2300 to 1350 YBP Late Prehistoric Period LP1 1350 to 650 YBP LP2 650 to 200 YBP Source:Mason and Peterson 1994 During the Newport Coast Archaeological Project, the Intermediate Horizon was not subdivided because only ten radiocarbon dates were available. Mason and Peterson were confident that the Intermediate Horizon could also be subdivided once calibrated dates were available from a wider region of the Newport Coast (Mason and Peterson 1994:58), and for that matter, all of Orange County or Southern California. The authors argue that, although their temporary subdivisions do not correspond with changes in stylistically defined artifact types, they may correspond with changes in settlement systems (Mason and Peterson 1994:58). The Intermediate Horizon was subdivided in Roger Mason's report on CA-ORA-225 (Mason at al. 1997b). Mason defined 3 periods based on 18 radiocarbon dates. These three divisions are Late Intermediate (1700-1350 YBP), Middle Intermediate (2300-1700 YBP) and Early Intermediate (3100-2300 YBP). Due to the small sample of radiocarbon dates, Mason at al notes that the Intermediate subdivisions could only be applied to CA-ORA-225 and not regionally. As a result of the Bonita Mesa Archaeological Project (document in progress), the Intermediate Period was redefined. A total of 72 radiocarbon dates from 6 sites were used to redefine the Intermediate. The Intermediate was divided into two periods: the late part of the Intermediate or INT2 (1350-2300 YBP) and the early part of the Intermediate or INT1 (2300- 3000 YBP). 3.1.2 Ethnohistory At the time of European contact in 1769, the Santa Ana plain was occupied by the Gabrielino Native Americans, so called by the Spanish after the nearby Mission San Gabriel Archangel. According to Bean and Smith (1978:538), the Gabrielino are, in many ways, one of the least known groups of California native inhabitants. In addition to much of the Los Angeles Basin, a:wgeo =D(acspwooscuwmMneed ae 91214.d= 6 Guttural Resources Assessment OCSD D1sltict 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Pmjecl(No.6-17) they occupied the offshore islands of Santa Catalina, San Nicolas, and San Clemente. Gabrielino populations are difficult to reconstruct; however, at any one time, as many as 50 to 100 villages were simultaneously occupied. Like the prehistoric culture before them, the Gabrielino were a hunter/gatherer group who lived in small sedentary or semi-sedentary groups, termed Rancherias, of 50 to 100 persons. These Rancherias were occupied by at least some people all of the time. Location of the encampment was determined by water availability. Within each village, houses were circular in form and constructed of sticks covered with thatch or mats. Each village had a sweat lodge and a sacred enclosure (Bean and Smith 1978). Their subsistence relied heavily on plant foods, but was supplemented with a variety of meat, especially from marine resources. Food procurement consisted of hunting and fishing carried out by men, and gathering of plant foods and shellfish by women. Hunting technology included bow and arrow use for deer and smaller game, in addition to stick-throwing, snares, traps, and slings. Fishing was conducted with the use of shell fishhooks, bone harpoons, and nets. Seeds were gathered with beaters and baskets. Food was stored in baskets. It was prepared with manos and metates, and mortars and pestles. Food was cooked in baskets coated with asphaltum, in stone pots, on steatite frying pans, and by roasting in earthen ovens (Bean and Smith 1978). Although the earliest description of the Gabrielino dates back to the Cabrillo expedition of 1542, the most important and extensive accounts were those written by Father Geronimo Boscana circa 1822 and Hugo Reid in 1852. Major Gabrielino villages south of the City of Long Beach apparently included Lukpa and Kengaa, also known as Gengara. Moyoonga is another place name cited by Kroeber (1907), but it is unclear if this was a community or a geographical designation (McCawley 1996:72). According to mission records, Kengaa may have been occupied as late as 1828 or 1829 (Merriam 1968). The place name was still used as late as 1853 identifying Newport Bay as "bolsa de gengara". Archaeological evidence suggests that CA-ORA-119A or CA-ORA-111 may be the remains of this important village. The other village, Lukpa, was, according to one of Kroeber's Native American informants, located in the City of Huntington Beach. One possibility is the Newland Site excavated by Winterboume in the 1930S and more recently by other investigators. During the early 1900s, important ethnographic studies were conducted by several researchers including Alfred L. Kroeber, John P Harrington, C. Hart Merriam, W.D. Strong, and J.W. Hudson. Each of these men was able to interview members of the Gabrielino who had living experience with the Mission period when the group was in transition. Central Orange County was shared by both the Juaneno (another Native American tribal group so named because of its association with Mission San Juan Capistrano) and Gabrielino. The three place names associated with central Orange County are Gangs, Pasbengna, and Hutuknga. Genga was located at CA-ORA-58 in what today is Fairview Park in the City of Costa Mesa. Pasbengna was located along the Santa Ana River approximately where the City of Santa Ana is today, and appears on the 1846 map drafted by Alexander Taylor. The third site, Hutuknga, is located where the City of Yorba Linda exists today (Earle and O'Neil 1994). The Gabrielino are frequently thought to have been the dominant ethnohistoric group in Orange County (e.g., Kroeber 1925). Earle and O'Neil have determined that sites along the Santa Ana River afforded pivotal political exchange and social interaction between the Gabrielino and Juaneno (1994). Based on Mission marriage records, the villages along the Santa Ana River apparently consisted of multi-ethnic populations (Earle and O'Neil 1994). Among the more significant sites along the northern coast of Orange County was the complex of sites surrounding Boise Chica, including CA-ORA-83, known as the "Cog Stone" site or the "Griset Site". As with Boise Chica, Newport Bay is surrounded by a number of prehistoric sites. The sites along the southern Orange County coast in the San Joaquin Hills include the multi-component complexes at Bonita Mesa, Pelican Hill, and Shady Canyon. RwJJe =D(=]A. oscuwmMa aec Ee e91214.d= 7 Guttural Resources Assessment OCSD Dlsftict 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Projecl(No. 6-17) 4.0 METHODS 4.1 CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH —SCCIC BonTerra Psomas Senior Archaeologist David M. Smith conducted a cultural resources records search and literature review at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton on August 4, 2014, to determine if the property had been subject to a cultural resources survey and if any cultural resources had been recorded on or within a one-mile radius. The SCCIC is the designated branch of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) for the project area and houses records concerning archaeological and historic resources in Los Angeles, Ventura, and Orange Counties. Data sources reviewed include archaeological records, Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility, historic maps, and the Historic Property Data File (HPDF) maintained by the California Office of Historic Preservation. The HPDF contains listings for the CRHR and/or NRHP, California Historical Landmarks, and California Points of Historical Interest. 4.2 NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION (NAHC) SACRED LANDS FILE REVIEW On August 22, 2014, BonTerra Psomas notified the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) of the proposed project. The NAHC conducted a search of their Sacred Lands Inventory to determine if any cultural resources were located within the project area. The NAHC provided BonTerra Psomas a list of nine tribes affiliated with the project area and recommended they be contacted regarding any information or comments they may have pertaining to the project. On August 25, 2014, the following people were notified in writing of the proposed undertaking and were requested to provide any information they may have regarding the history or prehistory of the project area. • Sandonne Goade, Chairperson, Gabrielino/Tongva Nation; • John Tommy Rosas, Tribal Administrator, Tongva Ancestral Territorial Tribal Nation; • Anthony Morales, Chairperson, Gabrielino/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians; • Sam Dunlap, Cultural Resources Director, Gabrielino Tongva Nation; • Robert Dorame, Tribal Chair/Cultural Resources, Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council; • Bennie Acuna, Chairperson, Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe; • Linda Candelaria, Chairwoman, Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe; • Andrew Sales, Chairperson, Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians; and • Conrad Acuna, Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe. Each of these Native American groups and individuals were notified by mail of the proposed project on August 25, 2014 (Attachment B). The notifications included an invitation to provide comments or information regarding historic or prehistoric activities on or near the project alignment. 4.3 SITE VISIT On August 21, 2014, David M. Smith, a BonTerra Psomas Senior Archaeologist, conducted a vehicular survey of the project alignment. Any areas that were not accessible by vehicle were inspected via Google Earth. n:wgama=D(=]A. oscuwmMa aec ea e91214.d= 8 Guttural Resources Assessment OCSD Distnct 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project(No.6-17) 5.0 RESULTS 5.1 RECORDS SEARCH The results of the records search indicate that at least 20 archaeological studies have been conducted within a '/:mile radius of the project area. Two of those studies included a portion of the project area (Table 2). John Romani provided an Archaeological Survey Report for the CA-ORA-55 Corridor in 1982. That study included the approximate southern 2/3 of the alignment, from Pacific Coast Highway north along Newport Boulevard until the alignment curves to the west near Orange Avenue (Table 2). That project resulted in updating CA-ORA-59 and CA-ORA-60, two shell middens initially recorded by Nelson in 1912 (Table 3). No new archaeological sites were discovered during that study. Also in 1982, Steele updated another shell midden site, CA-ORA-297,for a Historic Property Survey Report conducted along the same section of CA-ORA-55 (Table 2). The site was initially recorded by M. Ahlering in 1971 (Table 3). Another shell midden, CA-ORA-357, was recorded in by T. Elliott in 1973 during an unidentified project(Table 3). BonTerra Psomas also reviewed the Office of Historic Preservation's Historic Resources Inventory for Newport Beach to determine if any historic structures or objects had been recorded within a %2- mile radius of the project alignment. That review identified Our Lady Mount Carmel, a catholic church, located at 1441 Balboa Boulevard (Table 3). The building is not within the project alignment. Another structure, a modern office building, is also recorded within a %:mile radius of, but not within,the project alignment(Table 3). TABLE 2 CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDIES THAT INCLUDED A PORTION OF THE PROJECT ALIGNMENT Author Report Number (Year) Type of Study/Comments OR-00643 Romani,John F. Archaeological Survey Report for the ORA-55 Corridor (1982) OR-1951 Steele, K. D. Historic Resources Survey Report 07-ORA-55, PM 0.0/t4.22, (1982) Costa Mesa and Newport Beach,Orange County,California TABLE 3 CULTURAL RESOURCES ON OR WITHIN ONE-HALF MILE OF THE PROJECT ALIGNMENT Recorder Resource Site Number (Year) Description Within APE? 30-000297 Ahlering 1971 Shell Midden No 30-000357 T.Elliott 1973 Shell Midden No 30-000059 Nelson 1912 Shell Midden No 30-000060 Nelson 1912 Shell Midden No 30-177134 Supemowicz 2011 Once Building No 30-179477 Unknown 2011 Wild Goose(yacht) No 132140 Unknown 2002 Our Lady Mount Carmel No APE:Area of Potential Effects R:mrgeo =D(=)A. oscuwmMnaecE e91214.d= 9 Guttural Resources Assessment OCSD Dlsftict 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Pmjecl(No.6-17) 5.2 NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION SACRED LANDS INVENTORY Of the nine tribes contacted regarding the project, to date, one comment, sent via email, has been received from Andrew Sales, Chairman of the Kizh (Kit'c) Nation Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians (Attachment B). Mr. Salas indicated that the "project is located in and around a sensitive area where traditional territories of the Gabrieleno still exist". Mr. Sales further expressed an interest in providing Native American monitors during any and all ground- disturbing activities that occur as part of the sewer project. 5.3 SITE VISIT The site visit was conducted to determine if activities associated with the Trunk Sewer Relief Project could impact significant cultural resources. A survey of the built environment indicates that the alignment does not impact significant historical resources. The Trunk Sewer is thought to be 60 years old. However, the existence of several recorded prehistoric archaeological sites near the alignment suggest that other, unrecorded, prehistoric resources could exist in a subsurface context within the project alignment. 5.3.1 Sensitivity Map The OCSD requested that BonTerra Psomas generate a sensitivity map depicting the relative sensitivity of the either the pipeline as a whole or various segments (Exhibit 2). In light of the records search, the alignment should be considered moderately to highly sensitive for buried historic and/or prehistoric resources. Certain areas are more sensitive than others, and these are depicted on Exhibit 2. 6.0 MITIGATION 6.1 MITIGATION The following recommended mitigation measures should be completed for this project. 6.1.1 MM 1: Cultural Resources Monitoring Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit and/or action that would permit Project site disturbance, the Contractor shall provide written evidence to the Orange County Sanitation District that the Contractor has retained a qualified Archaeologist to observe grading activities and to salvage and catalogue archaeological resources, as necessary. The Archaeologist shall be present at the pre-grade conference; shall establish procedures for archaeological resource surveillance; and shall establish, in cooperation with the Contractor, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of the artifacts, as appropriate. If archaeological resources are found to be significant, the Archaeologist shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the City and Contractor, for exploration and/or salvage. These actions, as well as final mitigation and disposition of the resources, shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Director. Based on their interest and concern about the discovery of cultural resources and human remains during Project grading, a Native American Monitor shall be retained to observe some or all grading activities. Nothing in this mitigation measure precludes the retention of a single cross-trained observer who is qualified to monitor for both archaeological and paleontological resources. n:wgeo =D(=)A. oscuwmMa eec Ee e91214.d= 10 Cultural Resources Assessment — Moderate agot,— High AN .wn a [�si w�'; �'*-•r ♦.\ V � -yam( T - s> L . r r OCSD Dlsftict 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Pmjecl(No.6-17) 6.1.2 MM 2: Site Recordina The sewer is estimated to be 60 years old; minimally, it should be recorded on a standard Office of Historic Preservation Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 primary record form. Prior to any construction activities that could impact the sewer, an evaluation pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines should be accomplished to determine if it is eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources. 6.2 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 6.2.1 RR 3: Human Remains In accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are found, the County Coroner shall be notified within 24 hours of the discovery. No further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the County Coroner has determined, within two working days of notification of the discovery, the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are or believes them to be Native American, s/he shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento within 48 hours. In accordance with Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code, the NAHC must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the most likely descended (MLD) from the deceased Native American. The MLD(s) shall complete their inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The MILD would then determine, in consultation with the property owner, the disposition of the human remains. With implementation of the mitigation program listed above, potential impacts to archaeological resources would be reduced to a level considered less than significant. 7.0 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this cultural resources report, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. �DATE: September 2014 SIGNED: 44 "-74� David M. Smith Senior Archaeologist R:mrgeo =D(acs)A.umscuwmMw aeo Repd4091214.do 11 Guttural Resources Assessment OCSD Dlsftict 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Pmjecl(No. 6-17) 8.0 REFERENCES Bean, L.J. and CR. Smith 1978 Gabrielino. Handbook of North American Indians (R.F. Heizer, Ed.) 8:530-549. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Earle, D. and S. O'Neil 1994 Newport Coast Archaeological Project: An Ethnohistoric Analysis of Population, Settlement, and Social Organization in Coastal Orange County at the End of the Late Prehistoric Period (Prepared for Coast Community Builders, Newport Beach, California). The Keith Companies Archaeology Division, Costa Mesa, California. Koerper, H.C. 1981 Prehistoric Subsistence and Settlement in the Newport Bay Area and Environs, Orange County, California. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Riverside. Koerper, H.C. and C.E. Drover 1983 Chronology Building for Coastal Orange County: The Case from ORA-1 19-A. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 19(2):1-34. Kroeber, A.L. 1907 Shoshonean Dialects of California. University of California Publications in Archaeology and Ethnology 4(3):65-166. 1925 Handbook of the Indians of California (Reprinted 1976). Dover Publications, New York. Mason, R.D. 1991 Newport Coast Archaeological Project. Project Background and Research Design (Prepared by The Keith Companies Archaeology Division)Costa Mesa, California). Mason, R.D. and M.L. Peterson 1994 Newport Coast Archeological Project: Newport Coast Settlement Systems, Analysis and Discussion, Volume I (Prepared By The Keith Companies Archaeological Division). Costa Mesa, California. Mason, R.D., W.H. Bonner, S.J. Bousearen, L. Carbone, R.O. Gibson, L.P. Mug, M.L.Peterson, and V. Popper 1997a San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Results of Data Recovery at CA-ORA- 89, CA-ORA-736, and CA-ORA-1029 (Prepared by Chambers Group, Inc.). Irvine, California. 1997b San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Results of Data Recovery at CA-ORA-225. (Prepared by Chambers Group, Inc.). Irvine, California. McCawley, W. 1996 The First Angelinos: The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Maliki Museum Press/Ballena Press, Banning, California. Merriam, C.H. 1968 Village Names in Twelve California Mission Records. University of California Archaeological Survey Report 74. Berkeley, California. R:mrgeo =D(acsh.umscuwreiww,meeo Repd4091214.do 12 Guttural Resources Assessment OCSD Disttict(i Trunk Sewer Relief Projecl(No.6-17) National Park Service (NIPS) 1983 Archaeology and Historic Preservation; Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines: Professional Qualifications Standards. Washington, D.C. hftp:/Avww.cr.nps.gov/local-law/arch—stnds-9.htm. Newport Beach, City of. 1975 Council Policy Manual (K5: Archaeological Guidelines) (as amended through 2011). Newport Beach, California. Office of Historic Preservation 1990 Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format. Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento, California. Wallace, William J. 1955 A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology II: 214-23th. Warren, Claude N. 1968 Cultural Traditions and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern California Coast. In Archaic Prehistory in the Western United States. Eastern New Mexico Contributions in Anthropology 1(3): 1-14. Willey, Gordon R. and Philip Phillips 1958 Method and Theory in American Archaeology. University of Chicago Press. Chicago R:mrgeo =D(acspwooscuwmMa aecR e91214.d= 13 Guttural Resources Assessment ATTACHMENT A CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH (SCCIC) SCCIC Bibliography: Newport Beach OR-00270 Author(s): Leonard,Nelson N.IN and Mathew C.Hall Year 1975 Title: Description and Evaluation of Guttural Resources Within the US Amy Corps of Engineer'Santa Ana River Project A/fiilialion: Archaeological Research Un0, UC Riverside Resources: 30-000277 Quads: ANAHEIM,BLACK STAR CANYON,EL TORO,NEWPORT BEACH,ORANGE,PRADO DAM Pages: Notes: OR-00442 Author(s): Mabry,Theo N. Year. 1979 Title: Archaeological Records Search and Reconnaissance Survey Superior Avenue Realignment Route Affiliation: Archaeological Planning Collaborative Resoumes: Quads: NEWPORT BEACH Pages: Notes: OR-00587 Author(s). Rashke,Rod Year. 1980 Title: Archaeological and Paleontological Assessment,Mariners Othce Plaza,City of Newport Beach.California A/fli/iation: Archaeological Planning Collaborative Resources: 30-000061 Quads: NEWPORT BEACH Pages: Notes: OR-00588 Author(s): Rashke,Rod Year. 1981 Title: Archaeological and Paleontological Assessment,Waterfront Homes,City of Newport Beach,California AHliliation: Archaeological Planning Collaborative Resources: 30-000061 Quads- NEWPORT BEACH Pages: Notes: OR-00643 Author(s): Romani,John F. Year 1982 Title: Archaeological Survey Report for the ORA-55 Corridor Affliliation: Caltrans Resources: 36000059,30-000060,30A00297 Quads: NEWPORT BEACH Pages: 24 Notes: Page 1 of 5 9119/2013 1:39:43 PM SCCIC Bibliography: Newport Beach OR-00658 Author(s): Paden,Bath Year: 1983 Title: Archaeology at 471 Old Newport Boulevard Site Alfliliatlon: LSA Associates, Inc. Resources: 3M0005%3 Ixl 60,30-000148,30-000297.30-000357 Quads: NEWPORT BEACH Pages: Notes: OR-00666 Author(s): Seeman,Larry Year. 1981 Title: Historic Property Survey Pacific Coast Highway Widening Project Newport Beach,California Aiflihation: Larry Seeman Associates, Inc. Resources: 30-000060,30-000061,30-000062,30-000065,30-000066,30-000067,30-000068,30-000158 Quads: NEWPORT BEACH Pages: 70 Notes: OR-OO866 Author(s): Brock,James P. Year. 1987 Title: Archaeological Assessment of the 1.25-acre Property,2505 Cliff Drive,Newport Beach(ltm#12873) Alfliliation: Archaeological Advisory Group Resources: Quads: NEWPORT BEACH Pages: Notes' OR-00891 Authorial: Breece,William H. Year, 1988 Title: Cultural Resource Report for the Widening of Avon Street,Newport Beach APoiliation: LSAAssociates,Inc. Resources: Quads: NEWPORT BEACH Pages: 12 Notes: OR-00893 Authorls): Del Chard,Kathleen Year: 1981 Title: Archaeological Resource Assessment for Three Parcels in Newport Beach A/fliliation: Resources. 30-001002 Quads: LAGUNA BEACH,TUSTIN Pages: Notes: Page 2 of 5 9119QO131:39:43 PM SCCIC Bibliography: Newport Beach OR-01016 Author(s): Leonard, Nelson N.III Year. 1975 Title: Environmental Impact Evaluation:Route Alternates Between the Michelson Treatment Plant and Plants on the Santa Ana River,Orange County,California ARliliatiore University of California,Riverside Resources: 30-000057,30-000076.30-000121,30-000164,W-000165,30-000170,30-000174,30-000193,30-000347, 30-000348,30-000351 Quads: NEWPORT BEACH Pages: Notes: OR-01907 Author(sJ: Pal Beth and William Brescia Year 1989 Title: The Results of an Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Proposed Hoag Hospital Expansion Project She Newport Beach,Orange County,California AMilialion: LSA Associates,Inc. Resources: 30-000089 Quads: NEWPORT BEACH Pages: Nolen: OR-01951 Authorl Steele,K.O. Year 1982 Tide: Historic Property Survey 07-ORA-55,Pm O.OA4.22,Costa Mesa and Newport Bs-ech,Orange County, California Afflilialion. Cahmns Resources. 30-000059.30-000297 Quads: NEWPORT BEACH Pages, Notes, OR-02228 Authori Bissell,Ronald,M. Year, 2000 Title: Cultural Resources Reconnaissance of the East Addition Parking Structure,Hoag Memorial Hostpital, Newport Beach,Orange County,California AHliliation: RMW Paleo Associates Inc. Resources: Quads. NEWPORT BEACH Pages: Notes: Page 3 of 5 9/1920131:39:44 PM SCCIC Bibliography: Newport Beach OR-02231 Author's): Padon,Beth Year 2001 Title: Results for Phase I Archaeological Resources Study at the Newport Technology Center Project,Orange County ARliliation: Discovery Works,Inc. Resources 30-000059,30-000060 Quads. NEWPORT BEACH Pages: Notes OR-03619 Authar(s): Gust,Sherri Year: 2004 Title: Archaeological and Paleontological Evaluation Report and Mitigation Plan,Newport Boulevard Right-turn Lane Addition at Hospital Road Newport Beach,California Aflliliation: Cogstone Resource Management, Inc. Resources: Quads: NEWPORTBEACH Pages: Notes: OR-03626 Author(s): Brown,Joan C. Year 2004 Title: Cultural Resources Monitoring for the Hoag Memorial Hospdal Presbyterian Central Plant(cogen Building), City of Newport Beach,Orange County,California A/Bilintloo: SWCA Environmental Consultants, Inc. Resources: 30-000059,30-000060,30-000118 Quads: NEWPORT BEACH Pages: Notes: OR-04160 Authar(a): Supernowi¢,Dana Year: 2011 Title: Cultural Resources Study of the NewpoNBelbea Project,AT&T Site No.LAC448,3333 Pacific Coast Highway,Newport Beach,Orange County,California 92663 A/8fliation: Historic Resource Associates Resources: 30-000060.30-177134 Quads. NEWPORT BEACH Pages: 74 Notes: Page 4 of 5 9119/20131:39:44 PM SCCIC Bibliography: Newport Beach OR-04239 Authorts): Supernowicx,Dana Year: 2012 Title: Archaeological Survey Report of the Newport/Balboa Project,AT&T Site No,LAC448,3333 Pacific Coast Highway,Newport Beach,Orange County,California A/Biliation: Historic Resource Associates Resources 30-000060 Quads: NEWPORT BEACH Pages: 86 Notes: OR-04274 Author(s): Maxon,Pat Year: 2009 This: Draft Environmental Impad Report Sunset Ridge Park Project,Sch.No 2W9051036 Volume I Affi iation: BonTema Resources: 30-001600.30-001601,30-001602.30-001610 Quads: NEWPORT BEACH Pages: 20 Notes: Page 5 of 5 9/19/2013 1:39:44 PM Report List OCSD Trunk Sewer 6 Report No. OtherlDs Year Authors) Title "Illation Resources OR-00299 1978 Van Hom,David M. A Compilation of Amhaectogical,Historical and Archaeological Associates,Ltd 30-000058,30-0000]6,30- Paleontological Data for the City of Costa Mesa 000163.30-000165,30-000174, 30.000297,30-000357,30- 000506.30-000687 OR-00657 1983 Paden,Beth Archaeoloogy,at the Superior Avenue Site ISA Associates,Inc. OR-00688 1983 Archaeological Resources Survey of the Avon Archaeological Resource Street Project Management Corp. OR-03007 2002 Demcak,Carol R. Report 0 Archaeological Resources Archaeological Resource Assessment for Placentia Avenue Management Corp. Reconstruction Project,City of Costa Mesa, Orange County,California OR-03013 2002 Corneas.Carol R. Report of Archaeological Resources Archaeological Resource Assessment for 19th Street Reconstructon Management Corp. Project,City of Costa Mesa,Orange County, California Page 1 bf 1 SCCIC BUIM014 10:42:29 AM ATTACHMENT B NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION (NAHC) PSOMAS TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 14, 2014 TO: Ms. Katy Sanchez FAX NUMBER: (916) 657-5390 Program Analyst TEL NUMBER: (916) 653-6251 Native American Heritage Comm. PROJECT: OCSD J0005 1550 Harbor Boulevard, Ste. 100 FROM: David Smith West Sacramento, CA 95691 ❑ Fax/Pages_ ® E-Mail ❑ Fed Ex/Overnite Express ❑ Delivery/Courier REGARDING: Sacred Lands File Search and Contact List Reauest Dear Ms. Sanchez: BonTerra Psomas has been retained to complete a cultural resources study for the proposed OCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project located in the City of Newport Beach, Orange County, California. This project does not require a General or Specific Plan amendment or adoption; therefore, the project is not subject to the statutory requirements of Senate Bill. At your earliest convenience, please conduct a search of the Sacred Lands File for the proposed project, located within Sections 21 and 28 (Township 6 South; Range 10 West) of the USGS Newport Beach, CA 7.5 Minute Quadrangle. Refer to attached exhibit. The primary goal of this project is to provide an engineered solution to the wet weather capacity issues that currently exist with a reasonable level of confidence that a sewage spill will not occur on the 6-17 sewer during a 10-year return interval storm event. This will be performed by providing a recommended up-sized design for the Lower Portion of this sewer. The Mid and Upper portions do not require an increase in hydraulic capacity. However, the Mid Portion does include structural and corrosion issues that are affecting the hydraulic capacity. These portions will require rehabilitation or replacement. A cost effective solution must be determined so the service life of the 6-17 sewer may be extended by 30 years. An engineered access solution will also be provided for existing manhole number BPT0165-0000. Please fax the results to me at (714) 444-9599, or e-mail to david.smith@psomas.com, referencing your letter to the "OCSD Project No. 6.17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project". If you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at(714)444-9199 or via email. Sincerely, BonTerra Psomas Dr£-K-1- David M. Smith Senior Archaeologist/Project Manager 2 Ece c wwv C 6c k,Site 175 kO.e,CA 92614- T.(714)444-9199- P:(714)444-9599 O8/22/2014 15:98 FAX 916 857 5390 NAHC 10001/002 r NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION went 9AGMMEN70,CA 95891 (918)978+'1710 Faz t91 s!8rS51r1 August 22, 2014 David M. Smith Bon Terra Peonies 2 Executive Circle, Suite 175 Irvine, CA 92614 Sent by Fax:(714)444-9599 Number of Pages:2 Re:OCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project, Orange County. Dear Mr. Smith, A record search of the sacred land file has failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural resources in the immediate project area. The absence of specific site information in the sacred lands file does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites. Enclosed is a list of Native Americans individuals/organizations who may have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. The Commission makes no recommendation or preference of a single individual, or group over another. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. I suggest you contact all of those indicated, if they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult with the appropriate tribe or group. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification,the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call to ensure that the project information has been received. lt you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from any of these individuals or groups, please notify me. With your assistance we are able to assure that our lists contain current information. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at(916) 373-3712. Sincerely, L(k YWW3 Sanchea Associate Government Program Analyst 08/22/2014 15:38 FAX 916 657 5590 NAHC IM002/002 Native American Contact List Orange County August 21, 2014 Tongva Ancestral Territorial Tribal Nation Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe John Tommy Rosas, Tribal Admin, Linda Candelana, Co-Chairperson Gabrielino Tongva P.O. Box 180 Gabrielino tatmlaw@ggmall,com Bonsall , CA 92003 (310) 570-8567 tn213r 696-1� 4 Cell (760) 636-0854 Fax Gabrieleno/Tontiva San Gabriel Band of Mission Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians Anthony Morales, Chairperson Andrew Sales, Chairperson P.O. Box 693 Gabrielino Tongva P.O. Box 393 Gabrielino San Gabriel , CA 91778 Covina , CA 91723 rribalcouncll@aol.corn a brielenoindlans@yahoo, 6) 483-3564 Cell j626) 926.4131 (626) 286-1262 Fax Gabrielino /Tongva Nation Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe Sandonne Goad, Chairperson Conrad Acuna, 1061/2 Judge John Aiso St, Gabrielino Tongva P.O. Box 180 Gabrielino Los Angeles , CA 90012 Bonsall CA 92003 (951)807 0�¢/�'��com (760) 636-0854 Fax Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Co"It Gabrielino /Tongva Nation Robert F. Dorame, Tribal Chair/Cultural Resources Sam Dunlap, Cultural Resources Director P.O. Box 490 Gabriellno Tongva P.O. Box 86908 Gabrielino Tongva Bellflower CA 90707 Los Angeles , CA 90088 rn va@verizon.net samdunlap@earthlink.net 2Y761-6417 Voioe/Fax (909) 262-9351 Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe Bernie Acuna, Co-Chairperson P.O. Box 180 Gabrielino Bonsall CA 92003 3acunal @9gabrielinotribe.org '619) 294-6660 Office `310) 428-5690 Cell ;760) 636-0854 Fax "his list is current only as of the date of this document Ilstribution or this list does not re9ees any person of the statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the health and Safety Code, .action 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and Soctien 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. his list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cuburd resmm"for the proposed OCSO Proiew No.S-17, natrict 6 Trunk sewer Relief Prefect,Orange County. il i Ift PSOMAS Balancing the Natural and Built Environment August 25,2014 Mr.Bernie Acuria,Co-Chairperson Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe P.O. Box 180 Bonsall,California 92003 Subject: OCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project Dear Mr. Acufra: BonTerra Psomas has been retained to complete a cultural resources study for the proposed OCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project located in the City of Newport Beach,Orange County, California. This project does not require a General or Specific Plan amendment or adoption; therefore,the project is not subject to the statutory requirements of Senate Bill 18(Tribal Consultation Guidelines). However, as part of the background cultural resources research being conducted,this letter is to inform you of the proposed project and to request any relevant information you may have regarding cultural resources on or near the project site. Location The project location is shown on the USGS Newport Beach, CA 7.5 Minute Quadrangles) in Sections 21 and 28(Township 6 South;Range 10 West)(SB.B.". Refer to attached exhibit. Project The primary goal of this project is to provide an engineered solution to the wet weather capacity issues that currently exist with a reasonable level of confidence that a sewage spill will not occur on the 6-17 sewer during a 10-year return interval storm event. This will be performed by providing a recommended up-sized design for the Lower Portion of this sewer.The Mid and Upper portions do not require an increase in hydraulic capacity.However, the Mid Portion does include structural and corrosion issues that are affecting the hydraulic capacity. These portions will require rehabilitation or replacement. A cost effective solution must be determined so the service life of the 6-17 sewer may be extended by 30 years. An engineered access solution will also be provided for existing manhole number BPT0165-0000. NAHC Notification A Sacred Lands File Search conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC)failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural places on the project site. The NAHC also provided BonTerra Psomas with a list of Native American individuals/organizations that may have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. Your name and contact information was 2 Executive Circle included on the list and serves as the basis for this letter. surte 175 Irvine,CA 92614 Tel 714.444.9199 Fax114.044.9599 vmvi.Fsomas.com Mr. Bernie Acuna August 25,2014 Page 2 Records Search A cultural resources records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC)at California State University,Fullerton on August 4,2014 to evaluate the existing conditions of the project site; however, no recorded prehistoric Native American sites were identified on the project site.No exposed archaeological resources were identified. Your participation in this local planning process is important. If you have any additional knowledge of Native American Sacred Lands or other cultural resources on or near the study area,or any comment on the project,please contact me at your earliest convenience at(714)444-9199 or via email at david.smith@psomas.com,with a subject line referencing the"CCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project". Sincerely, Bon/T/e/rrrrra�Psornas v David M. Smith Archeologist Attachment: Exhibit 1 F�,.MOLaO(OCSNW 5kUN .Mcso T�nM S..ftiW NA Le Ie 025+4.Eao- PSOMAS Balancing the Natural and Built Environment August 25,2014 Mr. Conrad Acu0a Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe P.O. Box 180 Bonsall, California 92003 Subject: OCSD Project No. 6-17,District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project Dear Mr.Actil BonTerra Psomas has been retained to complete a cultural resources study for the proposed OCSD Project No. 6-17,District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project located in the City of Newport Beach,Orange County, California. This project does not require a General or Specific Plan amendment or adoption;therefore,the project is not subject to the statutory requirements of Senate Bill 18(Tribal Consultation Guidelines). However,as part of the background cultural resources research being conducted,this letter is to inform you of the proposed project and to request any relevant information you may have regarding cultural resources on or near the project site. Location The project location is shown on the USGS Newport Beach, CA 7.5 Minute Quadrangle(s) in Sections 21 and 28(Township 6 South; Range 10 West)(SB.B.M). Refer to attached exhibit. Project The primary goal of this project is to provide an engineered solution to the wet weather capacity issues that currently exist with a reasonable level of confidence that a sewage spill will not occur on the 6-17 sewer during a 10-year return interval storm event. This will be performed by providing a recommended up-sized design for the Lower Portion of this sewer. The Mid and Upper portions do not require an increase in hydraulic capacity.However,the Mid Portion does include structural and corrosion issues that are affecting the hydraulic capacity. These portions will require rehabilitation or replacement.A cost effective solution must be determined so the service life of the 6-17 sewer may be extended by 30 years. An engineered access solution will also be provided for existing manhole number BPT0165-0000. NAHC Notification A Sacred Lands File Search conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC)failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural places on the project site. The NAHC also provided BonTerra Psomas with a list of Native American individuals/organizations that may have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. Your time and contact information was 2 Executive Circle included on the list and serves as the basis for this letter. suite 175 Irvine.CA 92614 Tel 714.444.9199 Fex714.444.9599 .a.paomas.com Mr. Conrad Acufla August 25,2014 Page 2 Records Search A cultural resources records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC)at California State University,Fullerton on August 4, 2014 to evaluate the existing conditions of the project site;however, no recorded prehistoric Native American sites were identified on the project site.No exposed archaeological resources were identified. Your participation in this local planning process is important. If you have any additional knowledge of Native American Sacred Lands or other cultural resources on or new the study area, or any comment on the project, please contact me at your earliest convenience at(714)444-9199 or via email at david.smith@psomas.com,with a subject line referencing the"OCSD Project No. 6-17,District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project". Sincerely, BonTerra Psomas h/I////l David M. Smith Archeologist Attachment: Exhibit I RIP, ..tl CSa(OCSN=5iCuAmaA0C5a Trvnk Sew.Relief NA Letl.s UB l4, o. PSOMAS Balancing the Natural and Built Environment August 25, 2014 Ms.Linda Candelaria, Co-Chairperson Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe P.O. Box 180 Bonsall, California 92003 Subject: OCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project Dear Ms. Candelaria: BonTerm Psomas has been retained to complete a cultural resources study for the proposed OCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project located in the City of Newport Beach,Orange County, California. This project does not require a General or Specific Plan amendment or adoption;therefore,the project is not subject to the statutory requirements of Senate Bill 18(Tribal Consultation Guidelines). However,as part of the background cultural resources research being conducted,this letter is to inform you of the proposed project and to request any relevant information you may have regarding cultural resources on or near the project site. Location The project location is shown on the USGS Newport Beach, CA 7.5 Minute Quadrangles) in Sections 21 and 28(Township 6 South; Range 10 West)i Refer to attached exhibit. Project The primary goal of this project is to provide an engineered solution to the wet weather capacity issues that currently exist with a reasonable level of confidence that a sewage spill will not occur on the 6-17 sewer during a 10-year return interval storm event. This will be performed by providing a recommended up-sized design for the Lower Portion of this sewer. The Mid and Upper portions do not require an increase in hydraulic capacity.However,the Mid Portion does include structural and corrosion issues that are affecting the hydraulic capacity. These portions will require rehabilitation or replacement.A cost effective solution must be determined so the service life of the 6-17 sewer may be extended by 30 years. An engineered access solution will also be provided for existing manhole number HPT0165-0000. NAHCNotifrcation A Sacred Lands File Search conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC)failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural places on the project site. The NAHC also provided BonTerra Psomas with a list of Native American individuals/organizations that may have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area.Your name and contact information was 2 Executive Circle included on the list and serves as the basis for this letter. suite 175 Irvine,CA 92614 Tel 714.444.9199 Fax714.444.9599 www.Pcamaacom Ms. Linda Candelaria August 25,2014 Page 2 Records Search A cultural resources records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC)at California State University, Fullerton on August 4,2014 to evaluate the existing conditions of the project site; however, no recorded prehistoric Native American sites were identified on the project site.No exposed archaeological resources were identified. Your participation in this local planning process is important. If you have any additional knowledge of Native American Sacred Lands or other cultural resources on or new the study area,or any comment on the project,please contact me at your earliest convenience at(714)444-9199 or via email at david.smith@psomas.com,with a subject line referencing the"OCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project". Sincerely, Bona Psomas A David M. Smith Archeologist Attachment: Exhibit 1 R\PmleCs1OCSD(DCSILICLD51 WmMCSD TmM Se Repel NA Le sd2514.d— PSOMAS Balancing the Natural and Built Environment August 25, 2014 Mr. Robert Dorame,Tribal Chair/Cultural Resources Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council P.O. Box 490 Bellflower,California 90707 Subject: OCSD Project No. 6-17,District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project Dear Mr. Dorame: BonTerra Psomas has been retained to complete a cultural resources study for the proposed OCSD Project No. 6-17,District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project located in the City of Newport Beach,Orange County, California. This project does not require a General or Specific Plan amendment or adoption;therefore,the project is not subject to the statutory requirements of Senate Bill 18(Tribal Consultation Guidelines). However,as part of the background cultural resources research being conducted,this letter is to inform you of the proposed project and to request any relevant information you may have regarding cultural resources on or near the project site. Location The project location is shown on the USGS Newport Beach, CA 7.5 Minute Quadrangle(s) in Sections 21 and 28(Township 6 South;Range 10 West)(SB.B.HQ. Refer to attached exhibit. Project The primary goal of this project is to provide an engineered solution to the wet weather capacity issues that currently exist with a reasonable level of confidence that a sewage spill will not occur on the 6-I 7 sewer during a 10-year return interval storm event.This will be performed by providing a recommended up-sized design for the Lower Portion of this sewer.The Mid and Upper portions do not require an increase in hydraulic capacity. However,the Mid Portion does include structural and corrosion issues that are affecting the hydraulic capacity. These portions will require rehabilitation or replacement. A cost effective solution must be determined so the service life of the 6-17 sewer may be extended by 30 years. An engineered access solution will also be provided for existing manhole number BPT0165-0000. NAHC Notification A Sacred Lands File Search conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC)failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural places on the project site. The NAHC also provided BonTerra Psomas with a list of Native American individuals/organizations that may have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. Your name and contact information was 2 Executive Circle included on the list and serves as the basis for this letter. suite 175 Irvine,CA 92614 Tel 714.444.9199 Fan714.444.9599 wwwPaomas.com Mr. Robert Dorame August 25,2014 Page 2 Records Search A cultural resources records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC)at California State University, Fullerton on August 4,2014 to evaluate the existing conditions of the project site;however,no recorded prehistoric Native American sites were identified on the project site.No exposed archaeological resources were identified. Your participation in this local planning process is important. If you have any additional knowledge of Native American Sacred Lands or other cultural resources on or new the study area,or any comment on the project,please contact me at your earliest convenience at(714)444-9199 or via email at david.smith@psomas.com, with a subject line referencing the `CCSD Project No. 6-17,District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project". Sincerely, BonTer Psa David M. Smith Archeologist Attachment: Exhibit 1 RlPrejeCs1O0SO(OCSNW051CultuoAOCSO T-k Sewer Relief NA Le11ees-M514Eom .f Balancing the Natural and Built Environment August 25, 2014 Mr. Samuel H. Dunlap,Cultural Resources Director Gabrielino Tongva Nation P.O. Box 86908 Los Angeles,California 90086 Subject: OCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project Dear Mr. Dunlap: BonTerra Psomas has been retained to complete a cultural resources study for the proposed OCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project located in the City of Newport Beach,Orange County, California. This project does not require a General or Specific Plan amendment or adoption;therefore,the project is not subject to the statutory requirements of Senate Bill 18(Tribal Consultation Guidelines). However, as part of the background cultural resources research being conducted,this letter is to inform you of the proposed project and to request any relevant information you may have regarding cultural resources on or near the project site. Location The project location is shown on the USGS Newport Beach, CA 7.5 Minute Quadrangle(s) in Sections 21 and 28 (Township 6 South; Range 10 West)(S.B.B.h4).Refer to attached exhibit. Project The primary goal of this project is to provide an engineered solution to the wet weather capacity issues that currently exist with a reasonable level of confidence that a sewage spill will not occur on the 6-17 sewer during a 10-year return interval storm event. This will be performed by providing a recommended up-sized design for the Lower Portion of this sewer. The Mid and Upper portions do not require an increase in hydraulic capacity. However,the Mid Portion does include structural and corrosion issues that are affecting the hydraulic capacity. These portions will require rehabilitation or replacement. A cost effective solution must be determined so the service life of the 6-17 sewer may be extended by 30 years. An engineered access solution will also be provided for existing manhole number BPT0165-0000. NAHC Notification A Sacred Lands File Search conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC)failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural places on the project site. The NAHC also provided BonTerra Psomas with a list of Native American individuals/organizations that may have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. Your time and contact information was 2 Executive circle included on the list and serves as the basis for this letter. suae 175 Irvine,CA 92614 Tel 714.444.9199 Fax714.444.9599 viww.psomas corn Mr. Samuel H. Dunlap August 25,2014 Page 2 Records Search A cultural resources records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC)at California State University,Fullerton on August 4,2014 to evaluate the existing conditions of the project site;however,no recorded prehistoric Native American sites were identified on the project site.No exposed archaeological resources were identified. Your participation in this local planning process is important. If you have any additional knowledge of Native American Sacred Lands or other cultural resources on or near the study area,or any comment on the project,please contact me at your earliest convenience at(714)444-9199 or via email at david.smith@psomas.com, with a subject line referencing the"OCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project". Sincerely, BonTerralpsomas David M. Smith Archeologist Attachment: Exhibit 1 R NmIe CSD(OCSNW051CUXu.ROCSD T—k S.,Rebel NA Letl EQ514.Ocu i i A" PSOMAS Balancing the Natural and Built Environment August 25, 2014 Sandonne Goad,Chairperson Gabrielino Tongva Nation P.O. Box 86908 Los Angeles,California 90086 Subject: OCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project Dear Sandonne Goad: BonTerra Psomas has been retained to complete a cultural resources study for the proposed OCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project located in the City of Newport Beach,Orange County, California. This project does not require a General or Specific Plan amendment or adoption;therefore,the project is not subject to the statutory requirements of Senate Bill 18(Tribal Consultation Guidelines). However, as part of the background cultural resources research being conducted,this letter is to inform you of the proposed project and to request any relevant information you may have regarding cultural resources on or new the project site. Location The project location is shown on the USGS Newport Beach, CA 7.5 Minute Quadrangles) in Sections 21 and 28(Township 6 South; Range 10 West)(SB.B.hn. Refer to attached exhibit. Project The primary goal of this project is to provide an engineered solution to the wet weather capacity issues that currently exist with a reasonable level of confidence that a sewage spill will not occur on the 6-17 sewer during a 10-year return interval storm event. This will be performed by providing a recommended up-sized design for the Lower Portion of this sewer. The Mid and Upper portions do not require an increase in hydraulic capacity. However,the Mid Portion does include structural and corrosion issues that are affecting the hydraulic capacity. These portions will require rehabilitation or replacement. A cost effective solution must be determined so the service life of the 6-17 sewer may be extended by 30 years. An engineered access solution will also be provided for existing manhole number BPT0165-0000. NAHC Notification A Sacred Lands File Search conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC)failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural places on the project site. The NAHC also provided BonTerra Psomas with a list of Native American individuals/organizations that may have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. Your time and contact information was 2 Executive Circle included on the list and serves as the basis for this letter. suite 175 Irvine,CA 92614 Tel 714.444.9199 Fax T4.444.9599 aww.peomae.com Sandonne Goad August 25,2014 Page 2 Records Search A cultural resources records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC)at California State University,Fullerton on August 4, 2014 to evaluate the existing conditions of the project site; however,no recorded prehistoric Native American sites were identified on the project site.No exposed archaeological resources were identified. Your participation in this local planning process is important. If you have any additional knowledge of Native American Sacred Lands or other cultural resources on or near the study area,or any comment on the project,please contact me at your earliest convenience at(714)444-9199 or via email at david.smith@psomas.com, with a subject line referencing the"OCSD Project No. 6-17,District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project". Sincerely, BonTerra somas David M. Smith Archeologist Attachment: Exhibit 1 a:wreeaerocso(ocsryooascumrewcso Twk$c ael�r reversaez514 ft. PSOMAS Balancing the Natural and Built Environment August 25,2014 Mr.Anthony Morales,Chairperson Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Board of Mission Indians P.O. Box 693 San Gabriel,California 91778 Subject: OCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project Dear Mr. Morales: BonTerra Psomas has been retained to complete a cultural resources study for the proposed OCSD Project No. 6-17,District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project located in the City of Newport Beach,Orange County, California.This project does not require a General or Specific Plan amendment or adoption;therefore,the project is not subject to the statutory requirements of Senate Bill 18(Tribal Consultation Guidelines). However,as part of the background cultural resources research being conducted,this letter is to inform you of the proposed project and to request any relevant information you may have regarding cultural resources on or near the project site. Location The project location is shown on the USGS Newport Beach, CA 7.5 Minute Quadrangle(s) in Sections 21 and 28(Township 6 South; Range 10 West)(S.B.B.M). Refer to attached exhibit. Project The primary goal of this project is to provide an engineered solution to the wet weather capacity issues that currently exist with a reasonable level of confidence that a sewage spill will not occur on the 6-17 sewer during a 10-year return interval storm event.This will be performed by providing a recommended up-sized design for the Lower Portion of this sewer.The Mid and Upper portions do not require an increase in hydraulic capacity. However,the Mid Portion does include structural and corrosion issues that are affecting the hydraulic capacity.These portions will require rehabilitation or replacement. A cost effective solution must be determined so the service life of the 6-17 sewer may be extended by 30 years. An engineered access solution will also be provided for existing manhole number BPT0165-0000. NAHCNotifrcotion A Sacred Lands File Search conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC)failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural places on the project site. The NAHC also provided BonTerra Psomas with a list of Native American individuals/organizations that may have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. Your name and contact information was 2 Executive Circle included on the list and serves as the basis for this letter. suite 175 Irvine,CA 92614 Tel 714.444.9199 Fax714.444.9599 waw.Pmmas.com Mr. Anthony Morales August 25,2014 Page 2 Records Search A cultural resources records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC)at California State University,Fullerton on August 4,2014 to evaluate the existing conditions of the project site;however,no recorded prehistoric Native American sites were identified on the project site.No exposed archaeological resources were identified. Your participation in this local planning process is important. If you have any additional knowledge of Native American Sacred Lands or other cultural resources on or near the study area,or any comment on the project, please contact me at your earliest convenience at(714)444-9199 or via email at david.smith@psomas.com,with a subject line referencing the"OCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project". Sincerely, BonTerra Psomas David M. Smith Archeologist Attachment: Exhibit I 11pneCe1eC50(MSNl)sRCuleraRCCsa lmnk scorer Relief NA Las 83514. ox i i i 4"h PSOMAS Balancing the Natural and Built Environment August 25,2014 Mr.John Tommy Rosas,Tribal Admin. VIA EMAIL Tongva Ancestral Territorial Tribal Nation tat[nlaw@gmail.com Subject: OCSD Project No. 6-17,District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project Dear Mr. Rosas: BonTerm Psomas has been retained to complete a cultural resources study for the proposed OCSD Project No.6-17,District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project located in the City of Newport Beach,Orange County, California. This project does not require a General or Specific Plan amendment or adoption;therefore,the project is not subject to the statutory requirements of Senate Bill 18(Tribal Consultation Guidelines). However,as part of the background cultural resources research being conducted,this letter is to inform you of the proposed project and to request any relevant information you may have regarding cultural resources on or near the project site. Location The project location is shown on the USGS Newport Beach, CA 7.5 Minute Quadrangle(s) in Sections 21 and 28(Township 6 South; Range 10 West)(S.B.B.M. Refer to attached exhibit. Project The primary goal of this project is to provide an engineered solution to the wet weather capacity issues that currently exist with a reasonable level of confidence that a sewage spill will not occur on the 6-17 sewer during a 10-year return interval storm event. This will be performed by providing a recommended up-sized design for the Lower Portion of this sewer.The Mid and Upper portions do not require an increase in hydraulic capacity. However,the Mid Portion does include structural and corrosion issues that are affecting the hydraulic capacity. These portions will require rehabilitation or replacement. A cost effective solution must be determined so the service life of the 6-17 sewer may be extended by 30 years. An engineered access solution will also be provided for existing manhole number BPT0165-0000. NAHC Notification A Sacred Lands File Search conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC)failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural places on the project site.The NAHC also provided BonTerm Psomas with a list of Native American individuals/organizations that may have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. Your name and contact information was included on the list and serves as the basis for this letter. 2 Executive circle Suite 175 Irvine.CA 92614 Tel 714,444.9199 Fax714.444.9599 www.Psomm.com Mr. John Tommy Roses August 25,2014 Page 2 Records Search A cultural resources records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC)at California State University, Fullerton on August 4,2014 to evaluate the existing conditions of the project site;however, no recorded prehistoric Native American sites were identified on the project site.No exposed archaeological resources were identified. Your participation in this local planning process is important. If you have any additional knowledge of Native American Sacred Lands or other cultural resources on or near the study area, or any comment on the project,please contact me at your earliest convenience at(714)444-9199 or via email at david.smith@psomm.com,with a subject line referencing the "OCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project'. Sincerely, BonTerra Psornas k� David M. Smith Archeologist Attachment: Exhibit 1 RN,gW000SO(OLS)UWO51 tUMAOLSO Tmnk Sewn Re1W M lens¢-082510 do PSOMAS Balancing the Natural and Built Environment August 25,2014 Mr. Andrew Salas,Chairperson Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians P.O. Box 393 Covina,California 91723 Subject: OCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project Dear Mr. Salas: BonTerra Psomas has been retained to complete a cultural resources study for the proposed OCSD Project No.6-17,District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project located in the City of Newport Beach,Orange County, California. This project does not require a General or Specific Plan amendment or adoption;therefore,the project is not subject to the statutory requirements of Senate Bill 18(Tribal Consultation Guidelines). However,as part of the background cultural resources research being conducted,this letter is to inform you of the proposed project and to request any relevant information you may have regarding cultural resources on or near the project site. Location The project location is shown on the USGS Newport Beach, CA 7.5 Minute Quadrangle(s) in Sections 21 and 28(Township 6 South; Range 10 West)(SB.B.M. Refer to attached exhibit. Project The primary goal of this project is to provide an engineered solution to the wet weather capacity issues that currently exist with a reasonable level of confidence that a sewage spill will not occur on the 6-17 sewer during a 10-year return interval storm event. This will be performed by providing a recommended up-sized design for the Lower Portion of this sewer.The Mid and Upper portions do not require an increase in hydraulic capacity. However,the Mid Portion does include structural and corrosion issues that are affecting the hydraulic capacity. These portions will require rehabilitation or replacement. A cost effective solution must be determined so the service life of the 6-17 sewer may be extended by 30 years. An engineered access solution will also be provided for existing manhole number BPT0165-0000. NAHC Notification A Sacred Lands File Search conducted by the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC)failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural places on the project site.The NAHC also provided BonTerra Psomas with a list of Native American individuals/organizations that may have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. Your name and contact information was 2 Executive Circle included on the list and serves as the basis for this letter. B911e 175 Irvine,CA 92614 Tel 714.444.9199 Fax Y14.444.9599 www.Psomas.com Mr. Andrew Salas August 25,2014 Page 2 Records Search A cultural resources records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC)at California State University,Fullerton on August 4,2014 to evaluate the existing conditions of the project site;however,no recorded prehistoric Native American sites were identified on the project site.No exposed archaeological resources were identified. Your participation in this local planning process is important. If you have any additional knowledge of Native American Sacred Lands or other cultural resources on or near the study area,or any comment on the project,please contact me at your earliest convenience at(714)444-9199 or via email at david.smith@psomas.com,with a subject line referencing the"OCSD Project No. 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project". Sincerely, BonTerra Psomas David M. Smith Archeologist Attachment: Exhibit 1 RWmp WCSN(OCSN0X5\CulWmWCSO Tmnk Se r Re1W NA LMzta082514.Eaa 4 - - - Project Alignment ,r,i -1 � - :-L 01 J 11 10 I40 I a, �e 1 et = t Sr pm't H,,ht. > - ' i a j P9� ti IL ell Lighl 33 Liam r,= r t".• `"� a P k eA - NEWPORT BEACH " , poh � eay;. Ne ` PP�r vak Sou¢e:USGS75M We Qwd.,Il Neyporteeach Project Site Exhibit 1 OCSSD Project No. 6-17, Distract 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project w{ }E z,000 L000 o 21000 p �( Feet PSOMAS 1-11-111. Ill R11 .V I0 JW01 mr it emwi✓Men 11-S I. David Smith From: Andy Salas <andysalas07@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, September 05, 201411:50 PM To: tucker@gtpcenters.com; David Smith; Dr.Christina Swindall Martinez;Tim Miguel; Matt Teutimez.Kizh Gabrieleno Subject: OCSD project No.6-17, District 6 trunk sewer relief project Dear Hon Chair Larry Tucker This email is in regards to a letter our tribe received by an Archeologist consultant the City of New Port Beach contracted dated August 25,2014 Bon Terra Psomas. In regards to the project here is some history near and around the project location. "The project locale lies in and around a sensitive area and where traditional territories of the Kizh(Kitc) Gabrieleno still exist , and which villages adjoined and overlapped with each other, at least during the Late Prehistoric and Protohistoric Periods. This village was known "Kengaa". The homeland of the Kizh(Kitc)Gabrieleno, probably the most influential Native American group in aboriginal southern California(Bean and Smith 1978a:538), was centered in the Los Angeles Basin, and reached as far east as the San Bernardino-Riverside area. The homeland of the Serranos was primarily the San Bernardino Mountains, including the slopes and lowlands on the north and south flanks.Whatever the linguistic affiliation, Native Americans in and around the project area echibited similar orgainization and resource procurement strategies. Villages were based on clan or lineage groups. Their home/base sites are marked by midden deposits, often with bedrock mortars. During their seasonal rounds to exploit plant resources, small groups would migrate within their traditional territory in search of specific plants and animals. Their gathering strategies often left behind signs of special use sites, usually grinding slicks on bedrock boulders, at the locations of the resources. Therefore our tribe would like to work respectfully together with your project and Archeologist to protect any and all of our cultural resources . We would like to request our services as Certifed Native American Monitors and to be present during any and all ground disturbances. Thank you Chairman Andrew Salas Kizh(KiPc)Nation GAbrieleno Band of Mission Indians. Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians- e-mail disclaimer httl)://www.gabrielenoindians.orp/Site/DISCLAINER.html Sent from my iPhone r Appendix E - Geotechnical Report 1136054A Page intentionally blank. 1136054.1 -Puma FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. 700 South Flower Street,Suite 2116 Los Angeles.California 9001 Tel:(213)788-3500 Fax:(213)788-3526 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF PROJECT NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: RMC Water and Environment February 2014 Fugro Job No. 04.61130008 IORO FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. 700 South Flower Street,Suite 2116 Los Angeles,California 90017 Tel:(213)788-3500 Fax:(213)788-3626 February 18, 2013 Project No. 04. 61130008 RMC Water and Environment 15510-C Rockfeld Boulevard, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92618 Attention: Ms. Tricia Butler, P.E. Subject: Geotechnical Report, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project, Orange County Sanitation District Project No. 6-17, Newport Beach, California Dear Ms. Butler: Fugro is pleased to present this report summarizing the geotechnical conditions for the Orange County Sanitation District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project. The purpose of this report is to summarize the anticipated geotechnical conditions along the proposed sewer alignment from project-specific subsurface exploration and geotechnical testing performed for this study and to provide geotechnical engineering recommendations for the design and construction of the proposed sewer relief project. The report supplements our preliminary geotechnical report prepared for the project dated August 12, 2013 (Fugro, 2013). We appreciate the opportunity to provide design level geotechnical services for the Orange County Sanitation District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project and to continue our relationship with RMC Water and Environment. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding information presented herein. Sincerely, FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. Qµp Ahmadreza Mortezaie, Ph.D. Project Engineer Matthew O. Pollard, P.E., G.E. Associate Engineer Copies Submitted: (1)Addressee and Pdf A member of the Fugro group of companies with offices throughout the world cots ORO RMC Water and Environment M �� February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) 0.4 CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 4 1.1 General Statement........................................................................................... 4 1.2 Project and Site Description............................................................................. 4 1.3 Purpose........................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Previous Work................................................................................................. 5 1.5 Work Performed .............................................................................................. 6 1.5.1 Permitting and Site Clearance.............................................................. 6 1.5.2 Field Exploration .................................................................................. 7 1.5.3 Geotechnical Laboratory Testing ......................................................... 8 1.5.4 Geotechnical Evaluation/Reporting ...................................................... 8 2.0 FINDINGS................................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Geologic Setting .............................................................................................. 9 2.1.1 Regional Geology ................................................................................ 9 2.1.2 Local Geology...................................................................................... 9 2.2 Subsurface Conditions and Engineering Properties......................................... 9 2.2.1 Artificial Fill (at) .................................................................................... 10 2.2.2 Alluvium (Cal) ...................................................................................... 10 2.2.3 Engineering Properties......................................................................... 10 2.3 Groundwater.................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Existing Pavement Structural Section.............................................................. 11 2.5 Seismic Considerations and Geohazards........................................................ 12 2.5.1 Faults and Ground Rupture Potential................................................... 12 2.5.2 Strong Ground Shaking........................................................................ 12 2.5.3 Liquefaction Potential........................................................................... 13 2.5.4 Seismic Settlement.............................................................................. 13 2.5.5 Lateral Spreading................................................................................. 14 2.5.6 Tsunami/ Flooding .............................................................................. 14 3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................ 14 3.1 General............................................................................................................ 14 3.2 Excavations..................................................................................................... 14 3.2.1 Excavation Conditions.......................................................................... 14 3.2.2 Trench Subgrade and Stabilization ...................................................... 15 3.2.3 Dewatering........................................................................................... 16 3.3 Open Cut Construction and Excavations ......................................................... 16 3.3.1 Trenching and Temporary Excavations................................................ 16 3.3.2 Operations........................................................................................... 18 3.4 Trenchless Construction.................................................................................. 18 3.4.1 Pipe Bursting ....................................................................................... 18 3.4.2 Monitoring of Trenchless Construction................................................. 18 ORO RMC Water and Environment M �� Mill February 18,2013(Project No.04.81130008) 0.4 3.5 Fill Materials .................................................................................................... 19 3.5.1 General Fill .......................................................................................... 19 3.5.2 Imported Fill......................................................................................... 19 3.5.3 Bedding and Pipe Zone Materials ........................................................ 19 3.5.4 Trench Backfill Material........................................................................ 20 3.5.5 Backfill and Other Loads on Pipes....................................................... 20 3.5.6 Pipeline Uplift Considerations .............................................................. 21 3.5.7 Modulus of Soil Reaction ..................................................................... 21 3.6 Vaults and Manholes....................................................................................... 21 3.6.1 Allowable Bearing Capacity and Static Settlement............................... 21 3.6.2 Uplift Resistance.................................................................................. 21 3.6.3 Lateral Earth Pressures ....................................................................... 22 3.6.4 Sliding and Passive Resistance........................................................... 23 3.7 Soil Chemistry and Corrosion .......................................................................... 23 3.7.1 Test Results......................................................................................... 23 3.7.2 Corrosion and Cement Considerations ................................................ 23 4.0 LIMITATIONS........................................................................................................... 24 4.1 Report Use ...................................................................................................... 24 4.2 Potential Variation in Subsurface Conditions ................................................... 24 4.3 Hazardous Materials........................................................................................ 24 4.4 Local Practice.................................................................................................. 25 4.5 Plan Review..................................................................................................... 25 4.6 Construction Monitoring................................................................................... 25 5.0 REFERENCES......................................................................................................... 26 TABLES Page Table 1. Summary of Borings 7 Table 2. Summary of Pavement Section Thicknesses 12 Table 3. Preliminary Soil Parameters for Temporary Shoring Design 17 Table 4. Equivalent Fluid Weights for Estimating Lateral Earth Pressures 22 Table 5. Summary of Chemical Test Results 23 FIGURES Figure VicinityMap ...................................................................................................................... 1 Subsurface Exploration Map............................................................................................. 2 ORO RMC Water and Environment MMill February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) CHART Chart Site Exploration Plan and Profile....................................................................................... 1 APPENDICES APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION APPENDIX LABORATORY TESTING iii RMC Water and Environment R RIO February 18,2013(Project No.04.81130008) =� 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 GENERAL STATEMENT This report summarizes the findings and recommendations of Fugro's geotechnical study performed for the Orange County Sanitation District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project. The project alignment is located within the City of Newport Beach, California. The approximate location of the project is shown on Figure 1 -Vicinity Map. 1.2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION We understand the proposed project consists of reconstructing or rehabilitating an approximately 2,800-foot-long section of trunk sewer pipeline primarily located along the east side of Newport Boulevard and north of Pacific Coast Highway in the City of Newport Beach, California. The northern portion of the alignment will cross Newport Boulevard where it will tie into the existing sewer. The existing pipeline crosses Newport Boulevard to the south of Industrial Way and the proposed pipeline improvements will be located on the east side of Newport Boulevard. The trunk sewer pipeline project Will extend from manhole MH-170 (Station 20+48.04) on the north to manhole MH-25 (Station 48+14.35) on the south. The generalized project location is shown on Figure 2 - Subsurface Exploration Map. On the basis of conceptual information provided to us by RMC Water and Environment (RMC), we understand that a few different pipeline construction methodologies are being considered consisting of standard cut-and-cover construction and pipe bursting. The approximate limits where the various construction methodologies are proposed are presented on Chart 1 - Site Exploration Plan And Profile and Chart 1. We understand the re-constructed and rehabilitated pipeline will be approximately 12 to 18 inches in diameter and have an invert depth ranging between about 8 and 25 feet below the existing ground surface. New pipeline materials are expected to consist of VCP in the cut and cover sections and HDPE in the pipe-burst section. We understand the proposed trunk sewer pipeline improvements will consist of: • Cleaning and lining a 259-foot-long section of the existing sewer pipe between MH- 170 and MH-165; • Excavate and remove abandoned manhole (at Station 21+12.02) approximately 69 feet downstream of MH-170; • Relocate manhole MH-165 to the east shoulder of Newport Boulevard; • Realign the sewer pipeline and install new pipe between the relocated manhole MH-165 and manhole MH-145 using open cut construction, construct a new manhole in this realigned section between the relocated MH-165 and the existing MH-155; and • Install new pipeline between MH-145 and MH-025 using pipe bursting techniques. 4 6R0 RMC Water and Environment February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) In addition, the project will include improvements to various existing manholes and access facilities for maintenance purposes. The District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project area is located on the south-sloping portion of the Newport Mesa in the City of Newport Beach. The proposed project site slopes gently to the Pacific Ocean with ground surface elevations ranging from about El. +85 in the north to about +35 feet in the south. Existing topography along the pipeline alignment is shown on Chart 1 and Chart 1. The northern portion of the proposed pipeline alignment between about MH-165 (approx. Station 23+00) and MH-145 (Station 37+68.13) is located in landscaped shoulder areas of Newport Boulevard. Landscaping in the project area consists primarily of low-growth vegetation. The southern portion of the alignment consists of paved roadway and sidewalks between MH-145 (Station 37+68.13) and MH-020 (Station 48+14.35). 1.3 PURPOSE The purpose of this geotechnical study is to evaluate the geotechnical conditions in the vicinity of the proposed pipeline alignment by advancing site-specific soil borings and performing laboratory testing, and to provide opinions and geotechnical recommendations for design and construction of the proposed trunk sewer pipeline and related improvements. The project-specific subsurface exploration program consisted of advancing eight soil borings in the project area to depths of about 16.5 and 31.5 feet below the existing ground surface (bgs). The approximate locations of the soil borings are shown on Figure 2 - Subsurface Exploration Map. Locations explored for the project were selected by the project team. 1.4 PREVIOUS WORK Fugro provided a preliminary geotechnical report in 2013 (Fugro, 2013) to provide initial geotechnical engineering information to the project team and to assist in developing a preferred pipeline replacement technique. Principal tasks associated with our preliminary geotechnical study consisted of: • Reviewing of existing published geologic data and existing geotechnical data acquired by Caltrans and Law/Crandall in the vicinity of the proposed alignments; Meetings with staff from RMC's Irvine office to discuss the project elements and the conceptual pipeline alignments; and performing a site reconnaissance to observe the existing conditions along the proposed pipeline alignment; and • Preparing our preliminary geotechnical report for use in preliminary design of the project. 5 6R0 RMC Water and Environment M February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) 02 Geologic and geotechnical information from the data review and field reconnaissance were evaluated to characterize the potential subsurface conditions that may exist along the proposed pipeline alignment. Our work also included a preliminary discussion of potential geohazards that could affect the project during its design life. Subsurface exploration was not included in our scope of work for the preliminary geotechnical study. 1.5 WORK PERFORMED The scope of services performed for this study consisted of conducting a project-specific field exploration and laboratory-testing program, geotechnical engineering evaluation, and preparation of this report. The field exploration program was performed in general accordance with Task 2 of our proposal dated November 2, 2012. Our services were authorized by our agreement with RMC dated February 20, 2013. Work tasks performed for the project consisted of the following: 1.5.1 Permitting and Site Clearance Fugro reviewed the project plans and performed a site reconnaissance to locate the soil borings for site access, utility clearance, and permitting. Field exploration in the right-of-way of Newport Boulevard required encroachment permits from both the City of Newport Beach and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Permitting and site clearance tasks consisted of: • Completed the Caltrans standard encroachment permit application and provided a work plan including traffic control plans for the proposed subsurface exploration. • Completed the City of Newport Beach encroachment permit application and obtained a permit from City of Newport Beach for temporary streettsidewalk closure. • Visited the site with a Caltrans permit inspector to observe the proposed boring locations for the presence of overhead and underground utilities and to determine drill rig accessibility prior to the start of the field exploration program. Fugro invited staff from RMC and OCSD to this field meeting. • Marked each boring location with white paint and contacted Underground Service Alert (USA) and verified that all agencies listed on the USA ticket had responded to ensure no conflicting underground utilities were marked or noted in the field at the boring locations. • Sent a work completion notice to Caltrans following the field exploration. 6 6R0 RMC Water and Environment IN February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) 1.5.2 Field Exploration The field exploration program consisted of excavating eight soil borings on October W and 15r", 2013. The soil borings were advanced along the proposed alignment to depths ranging between about 16.5 and 31.5 feet below ground surface. Drilling and sampling was performed by Martini Drilling, under subcontract to Fugro, using a CME 75 truck-mounted drill rig equipped with hollow-stem augers. The locations of the eight soil borings are presented on Figure 2 and Chart 1. Logs of borings are presented in Appendix A- Field Exploration. Table 1 below presents a summary of the borings, including completion depth and depth to groundwater, if encountered. Table 1. Summary of Borings Completion Coordinates,Lat/Long Approximate Depth to Completion Boring Completion Elevation, Water(a) Depth(a) Northing Easting NAVD88(ft) B-1 10/15/13 33.630° -117.9260 66 20 21.5 B-2 10/15/13 33.630' -117.926' 60 12 16.5 B-3 10/15/13 33.629' -117.926' 50 14 16.5 B-4 10/15/13 33.628' -117.927' 50 Not Encountered 21.5 B-5 10/15/13 33.6270 -117.9270 48 Not Encountered 21.5 B-6 10/14/13 33.626° -117.928° 45 17.5 24.5 B-7 10/14/13 33.625' -117.928' 40 25 31.5 B-8 10/14/13 33.623' -117.928' 34 19 31.5 Although nine locations were initially planned, one of the two borings paired together between MH-135 and MH-140 was located on the sidewalk and had to be deleted due to encroachment permit constraints. Each boring location was sampled at approximately 2.5-foot to 5-foot intervals using 2- inch outside-diameter (OD) standard penetration test split spoon samplers and 3-inch OD modified California split-spoon samplers. The modified California sampler was used with 1-inch high brass ring liners. The samplers were driven into the materials at the bottom of the borehole using a 140-pound CME automatic-trip hammer. The blow count (N-value)was recorded, which is the number of blows from the hammer that were needed to drive the sampler 1 foot, after an 7 6R0 RMC Water and Environment February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) initial 6 inch seating interval. Bulk samples of material to a depth of up to about 5 feet of the ground surface were collected at each boring location. Organic Vapor Meter (OVM) readings were conducted on each sample from the soil borings in accordance with Orange County Environmental Health Department requirements. An engineer from Fugro logged the subsurface soil conditions in general accordance with ASTM D2488 and packaged the samples for transport to the laboratory for subsequent testing. Locations of each exploration were recorded using a hand-held GPS device. The sample intervals, recorded N-values, a description of the subsurface conditions encountered, pocket penetrometer readings, OVM readings (in parts per million), and other field and laboratory data are presented on the boring logs in Appendix A. Following logging and sampling at each location, all soil borings were backfilled to near the ground surface with cuttings and the asphalt pavement was patched with quick-set-cement that was dyed black. Any remaining cuttings were spread onsite. 1.5.3 Geotechnical Laboratory Testing Geotechnical laboratory testing was performed on selected earth materials sampled in the soil borings to characterize the materials and to aid in estimating relevant engineering design parameters. The testing program consisted of measurement of moisture/density, compaction, grain-size, plasticity, sand equivalent, R-value, shear strength, as well as limited chemical testing (pH, resistivity, sulfates, and chlorides). The laboratory test results are presented in Appendix B - Laboratory Testing. 1.5.4 Geotechnical Evaluation/Reporting We evaluated and analyzed the field and laboratory geotechnical data, developed opinions and geotechnical engineering recommendations to aid in the design and construction of the project, and prepared this report to summarize our findings, opinions and recommendations. Our report includes the following: • Descriptions of the regional geologic setting and site-specific soil and groundwater conditions encountered in explorations advanced at the site; • Discussion of seismic setting and potential geohazards; • Summary of existing pavement sections at the drill-hole locations; • A cross section depicting the interpreted subsurface site conditions along the proposed alignment based on preliminary profiles provided by RMC; • Geotechnical design parameters for trenchless construction and pipeline design; 8 6RO RMC Water and Environment M February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) • Foundation design parameters for project structural elements such as vaults or manholes; • Construction considerations; • Excavation and trenching conditions of soil units; • Evaluation of corrosion potential for buried ferrous metal and concrete; and • Suitability of excavated material for use as pipe zone backfill, trench backfill, and structure backfill material; 2.0 FINDINGS 2.1 GEOLOGIC SETTING 2.1.1 Regional Geology The project is located in the City of Newport Beach, California. The study area includes the broad southern margin of the Los Angeles Basin, which culminates abruptly with the Newport-Inglewood Uplift. This uplift is characterized by broadly warped coastal mesas of late Miocene to early Pleistocene marine sediments and late Pleistocene marine terrace deposits. The coastal mesas are deeply incised by the antecedent ancestral Santa Ana River system of late Pleistocene to early Holocene age. 2.1.2 Local Geology The project site is situated on a broad upland known as Newport Mesa that contains the central and northwestern portions of the City of Newport Beach. Newport Mesa extends southeast where it is divided from the San Joaquin Hills by stream and other erosional influences of the Newport Bay estuary system. The project site is about a mile north of the Pacific Ocean and two miles from the Santa Ana River. The site is underlain by Quaternary marine terrace deposits and alluvium. The project area is developed and the alluvial materials likely are overlain by artificial fill materials associated with roadway and other construction activities. The Newport-Inglewood fault zone is the closest such feature to the site and is located approximately 0.5 miles west/southwest of the project site. 2.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AND ENGINEERING PROPERTIES Subsurface materials encountered by the explorations generally consist of artificial fill materials and alluvial sediments to the depths explored (about 16.5 to 31.5 feet bgs). However, the two locations performed at the south end of the project area (B-7 and B-8) may have encountered Pleistocene San Pedro Formation marine deposits near the bottom of the boring. The findings from this study are generally consistent with those described in reports prepared by previous investigators that we reviewed for our preliminary geotechnical study(Fugro, 2013). 9 6R0 RMC Water and Environment M February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) 2.2.1 Artificial Fill (at) The soil borings for this project were advanced in paved roadway or shoulder areas. The pavement section generally consisted of asphalt concrete over granular base materials. In many cases the artificial fill materials existing beneath the pavement structural section were not readily distinguishable from the underlying alluvial sediments based on visual observations. However, there is a potential that the upper few feet of soil material beneath the pavement sections have been reworked and graded during road construction. With the exception of aggregate base, soils used as fill were likely derived from the underlying alluvial materials. Because it was difficult to differentiate the fill from the underlying alluvium in the project area, notations of and contacts between fill or alluvial soils shown on the logs of borings may vary from actual conditions encountered during construction. 2.2.2 Alluvium (Qal) Alluvial materials sampled in the soil borings consisted of layered coarse and fine- grained deposits. The coarse-grained, or granular, deposits generally consisted of medium dense to dense silty sand and clayey sand. Locally very loose to loose and dense silty sand and clayey sand with trace amounts of shell fragments, gravel ranging to about 2 to 3 inches in diameter, and organics (such as tree roots) were encountered. Fine-grained soils were encountered in drill holes B-4 and B-5 below a depth of about 5 feet, in B-1 between 15 and 20 feet, and in B-7 and B-8 at depths of about 30 feet (we note the fine-grained soils in B-7 and B-8 could be San Pedro Formation). The fine-grained soils generally consisted of medium stiff to very stiff fat clay, fat clay with sand, elastic silt with sand, and sandy lean clay. 2.2.3 Engineering Properties A summary of the general engineering parameters for the tested materials is provided below. • SPT N-values within the granular soils generally ranged from about 2 to greater than 50 blows per foot. Based on the field SPT N-value data, in our opinion, the consistency of the granular alluvium is variable and is generally: o Medium dense to dense within the portion of the alignment where open cut construction is planned, o Loose to dense within the portion of the alignment where pipe bursting is planned, • SPT N-values within the fine-grained soils generally ranged from about 4 to 10 blows per foot. Based on the field pocket penetrometer and SPT N-value data, in our opinion, the consistency of the fine-grained alluvium is variable and is generally medium stiff to stiff. 10 6R0 RMC Water and Environment February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) 02 • Moisture-density test results indicate dry unit weights ranging from 68 to 92 pounds per cubic foot (pct) on fine-grained samples, and 98 pcf to 127 pct on coarse- grained samples; with moisture contents ranging from about 27 to 74 on fine- grained samples, and 8 to 29 percent for tested coarse-grained samples. • One direct shear test was performed on selected sample of granular alluvium and resulted in a measured a peak friction angle of 39 degrees and peak cohesion of 300 pounds per square foot (psf). • Two compaction tests (ASTM D1557) were performed on selected samples to assess their compaction characteristics. The tests results indicate maximum dry densities of 111 to 131 pct and optimum moisture contents of 8.2 to 16.1 percent. • The results of the percent passing the No. 200 sieve range from about 61 to 96 percent on fine-grained samples, and from about 7 to about 49 percent on coarse- grained samples. 2.3 GROUNDWATER Review of the California Geologic Survey (CGS) Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the project area (formerly CDMG, 1997), indicates that the historic high groundwater level in the vicinity of the alignment is about 10 feet bgs. Groundwater was encountered during field exploration in six of eight soil borings at depths ranging from 12 to 25 feet bgs along the project alignment. We note that the groundwater depths indicated on our boring logs as well as those in data presented in our preliminary geotechnical report (Fugro, 2013) may not reflect seasonal, perched, or static groundwater conditions and that the actual groundwater level encountered during construction could be higher or lower than those noted herein. The invert depth of the pipeline is anticipated to range from about 8 to 25 feet below the existing ground. Considering the proposed invert depths and the groundwater conditions encountered in our borings, in our opinion, groundwater will likely be encountered in excavations required to install the proposed pipeline and construct the associated improvements. 2.4 EXISTING PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION Existing asphaltic concrete pavement thicknesses measured during this study ranged from 6.5 to 10 inches and the underlying base materials ranged from 6 to 24 inches at the locations explored. The thicknesses of the pavements and base measured at each of the soil boring location are presented in Table 2 below and on the logs of borings in Appendix A. 11 6R0 RMC Water and Environment February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) Table 2. Summary of Pavement Section Thicknesses Asphalt Base Approximate Boring Concrete Materials Station Number (in) (in) B-1 7.5 6.5 21+00 B-2 6.5 6.5 23+50 B-3 8 8 27+00 B-4 8.5 6 31+00 S-5 7 7 34+00 B-6 9 9 38+00 B-7 10 8 42+50 B-8 8 24 48+50 2.5 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS AND GEOHAZARDS Potential geohazards that may exist within the project area are summarized below. Our opinions regarding potential geologic hazards are based on the data obtained from this study, limited existing geotechnical data, and published data provided in CGS (1997, 2009), and the City of Newport Beach (2007). 2.5.1 Faults and Ground Rupture Potential The project site is located within a seismically active area and the potential exists for strong ground motion to affect the project during the design lifetime. In general, the primary effects will be those phenomena associated with shaking and/or ground acceleration. Those effects can likely be mitigated through appropriate design and construction procedures. The proposed pipeline alignment is not located within or cross an Alquist-Priolo fault rupture hazard zone, and no known active or potentially active faults cross the project alignment. The closest active fault is the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone and that fault is located about Yz-mile southwest of the project site. Therefore, in our opinion, the potential for fault- related ground rupture to impact the proposed pipeline is considered to be low to very low. However, there is a potential for strong ground shaking to occur at the project site as a result of earthquakes occurring on local or regional faults. 2.5.2 Strong Ground Shaking The 2008 USGS Interactive Deaggregation web site (USGS, 2008a) was used to probabilistically estimate the potential for strong ground motion at the site. Latitude N33.6256° 12 6R0 RMC Water and Environment February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) and longitude W117.92760 was used as the input location for estimating the peak ground acceleration (PGA) and alluvial site conditions were assumed. Based on our evaluations, we estimate that a PGA for an event with a 10-percent probability of exceedance in a 50-year exposure period (i.e., a return period of about 475 years) is about 0.35g. Also, according to USGS (2008b), the mean moment magnitude is 6.64 at a distance of 18.1 km from the site. The shear wave velocity of the alluvium was assumed to be 270 meters per second consistent with the range of shear velocity provided in the 2010 California Building Code for Site Class D soils. 2.5.3 Liquefaction Potential Liquefaction is generally described as the sudden loss of soil strength because of a rapid increase in soil pore water pressures due to cyclic loading during a seismic event. In order for liquefaction to occur, three general geotechnical characteristics must be present: 1) groundwater must be present within the potentially liquefiable zone; 2) the potentially liquefiable soil must be granular and the grain size distribution should fall within a relatively specific range; and 3) the potentially liquefiable soil must be of low to moderate relative density. If those criteria are met and strong ground motion occurs, then those soils may liquefy, depending upon the intensity and cyclic nature of the strong ground motion. Liquefaction that produces surface effects generally occurs in the upper 40 to 50 feet of the soil column, although the phenomenon can occur deeper than 100 feet. The CGS (1997) indicates that the majority of the project area is classified as being outside the area which is susceptible to liquefaction. However, groundwater and soil materials considered susceptible to liquefaction were encountered in our explorations. Soil borings B-6, B-7, and B-8 in the southern end of the project area encountered loose to medium dense granular soil below the groundwater level. We note that blowcount measurements obtained below the groundwater level using hollow-stem auger drilling methods can be affected or impacted by flowing sand conditions. However, our findings were consistent with those reported in Law/Crandall (1997) as discussed in our preliminary geotechnical report (Fugro, 2013). Therefore, in our opinion, there is a potential for liquefaction to occur in the southern portion of the alignment. In addition, there is a potential for liquefaction to occur in other portions of the alignment below the depths explored for this study. 2.5.4 Seismic Settlement Seismic settlement can occur in dry cohesionless soils as a result of the rearrangement of soil particles and densification caused by the shaking. Settlement can also occur as a result of liquefaction occurring below the groundwater level. We anticipate that seismic settlement at the site would likely result from a combination of liquefaction-related settlement and densification of dry cohesionless soils (sand, silty sand, etc.) from earthquake shaking. Based on the sampler blow count data from our soil borings, we estimate that seismic settlements in the project area from a design-level earthquake (475-year return period) would likely be less than about an inch. 13 6R0 RMC Water and Environment February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) 2.5.5 Lateral Spreading Considering the absence of free faces near the proposed pipeline, the current soil and groundwater conditions and the estimated liquefaction hazard, in our opinion, the potential for lateral spreading appears to be low. However, the risk of lateral spreading would be greater if the groundwater level was to rise in the future to within about 10 feet of the ground surface. Therefore, the risk of lateral spreading should not be considered nonexistent. 2.5.6 Tsunami /Flooding The project site lies adjacent to Newport Bay at an elevation of between about +35 feet to +85 and the potential for flooding to impact the project area is small. If considered a potential hazard, flooding should be evaluated by the project's civil engineer. The project area is in close proximity to the ocean however, the mapped tsunami inundation area (CGS, 2009) does not extend into the project area indicating that the potential tsunami hazard can be considered low. 3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 GENERAL The geotechnical conditions in the project area were evaluated from the soil borings excavated for this study and from our review of existing geotechnical data as referenced herein. Geotechnical engineering recommendations for the project generally address the open cut portions of the pipeline and the trenchless or pipe bursting construction. Geotechnical conditions within the alignment primarily consist of interlayered medium dense to dense coarse- and medium stiff to stiff fine-grained alluvial or marine terrace materials as sampled in the soil borings. Groundwater was encountered at depths ranging between 12 and 25 feet (bgs) in six of the eight borings advanced for this study. Data reported in CGS (1997) is generally consistent with data from our study and suggests that historic high groundwater may be within about 10 feet of the ground surface. 3.2 EXCAVATIONS 3.2.1 Excavation Conditions The earth materials encountered in the soil borings excavated for this study consist primarily of interlayered silty sand and clayey sand. Fat clay soils were encountered in borings B-4 and B-5 and to a lesser extend in borings B-1, B-7, and B-8. In our opinion the granular soils are susceptible to caving. Therefore, appropriate shoring or laying back of trench walls should be utilized to reduce the potential for caving of trench excavations, access pits, and manhole excavations. 14 6R0 RMC Water and Environment M February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) 02 Based on our observations during drilling, we anticipate that conventional heavy grading equipment in good working order should be capable of excavating the earth materials encountered along the alignment. However, smaller equipment may be necessary where working space is limited. 3.2.2 Trench Subgrade and Stabilization Depending on the subgrade moisture conditions, groundwater levels at the time of construction, and construction activities near the bottom of the excavation, localized unstable or pumping subgrade conditions could be encountered. If pumping subgrade conditions are encountered, measures should be taken to stabilize the trench subgrade prior to placing pipe bedding or fill material. In addition, the excavations should be protected against rainwater and surface water runoff, and efforts should be made to maintain a dry, workable trench subgrade. In addition to overexcavation for pumping/unstable subgrade, additional overexcavation may be required below the proposed trench bottom to remove loose, soft, or unsuitable materials. The contractor, after considering input from the design engineer, geotechnical engineer, and owner, should be responsible for design and implementation of trench subgrade stabilization techniques. Some methods that have been used successfully to stabilize trench subgrade consist of: • Rock stabilization. The exposed unstable subgrade can be excavated and a geotextile fabric or biaxial geogrid can be placed along the excavation bottom and covered with at least 1 foot thick of compacted processed miscellaneous base (PMB) conforming to the requirements of Section 200-2.5 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (i.e. Greenbook 2003 edition). One- inch crushed gravel can be used in lieu of PMB; however, a layer of non-woven filter fabric (such as Mirafi 180N) should be placed over the gravel to separate the gravel from the overlying fill. Trench plugs should be provided to prevent lateral migration of water through the gravel stabilization layer. • Controlled Lean Slurry Mix. The exposed unstable subgrade can be overexcavated and replaced with controlled lean slurry mix (or 2-sack sand-cement slurry). On the basis of our past experience with unstable trench subgrade conditions, the placement of about 1 foot of gravel may be required to provide subgrade conditions that are suitable for the placement of pipe bedding and pipe zone backfill material. PMB materials used for stabilization should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction as determined by American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D1557. Gravel used for stabilization should be wheel-rolled or vibrated in place until no reduction in volume is observed. Filter fabric materials should encapsulate the gravel stabilization layer. 15 6R0 RMC Water and Environment February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) 3.2.3 Dewatering Groundwater was encountered at 12 to 25 feet during drilling at the exploration advanced for this study and we understand that the historic high groundwater is about 10 feet bgs. We recommend that provisions for dewatering be incorporated into the project documents. The dewatering system used for the project should be designed, installed and maintained by an experienced company specializing in groundwater dewatering systems and the system be capable of lowering the groundwater surface to a depth of at least 3-feet below the required depth of excavation. Groundwater levels should be maintained below any point on the excavated surface (defined by the elevation of any overexcavated surface) and should provide excavation sidewalls free of groundwater seepage. Excavations for the project should not be made until it can be confirmed or demonstrated that the groundwater level has been lowered as required. Dewatering operations will require permitting in accordance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations and possibly other local permits. 3.3 OPEN CUT CONSTRUCTION AND EXCAVATIONS 3.3.1 Trenching and Temporary Excavations Excavations more than 4 feet deep should be sloped, shored, or shielded in accordance with federal and state standards, project specifications, and safe construction practices. The contractor is responsible for providing and maintaining safe excavations, according to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations. In areas where the right-of-way is of sufficient width, temporary excavations could potentially be laid back. Fat clay and sand with varying amounts of silt, clay and gravel (OSHA Type C soils) were encountered in the soil borings. Therefore per OSHA's 29 CFR Part 1926, unsupported excavations in these soils that are free from groundwater seepage should be sloped no steeper than 1.5(h):1(v). In addition, flatter slopes may be warranted depending on exposed soil conditions. Temporary excavations should be monitored for stability during construction and be modified, if necessary. Excavations lacking adequate sidewall support could move or become unstable and result in damage to existing improvements and utilities adjacent to the pipeline trench or excavations. The use of unshored excavations will limit traffic access near the top of temporary slopes. Where there is insufficient width or where other factors would prohibit the use of temporary construction slopes, an excavation shoring system will likely be required. Based on our discussion with the project team, we understand limited space will be available for construction on this project and vertical trenches will be required. The selection, design, and installation of any shoring system needed for the project should be made by the contractor, in accordance with OSHA regulations and good construction practice and pipe manufacturer's recommendations. 16 6R0 RMC Water and Environment 1111�� February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) Trench box-type shoring systems can be used to provide for the safety of personnel working in the relatively shallow excavations (generally less than about 20 feet). However, because a space between the excavation side wall and the trench box is required for installation, trench boxes are usually not placed in contact with the soil and do not provide for stability of the side walls. This allows the side walls to deform, slump, ravel or erode to fill the initial space between the trench box and the recently excavated side walls. Movement, slumping, or erosion of the soil from the side wall can potentially result in distress to pavements, adjacent structures, or adjacent utilities and could make subsequent removal of the trench box difficult. Because of these issues, in our opinion, care should be taken when using trench box- type shoring systems especially in areas where utilities or critical surface improvements exist proximal the excavation. Where trench boxes are used, the contractor should take measures to fill the initial space between the side wall and the box and use caution when removing the box. Backfill should be placed in stages as the boxes are removed from the excavation. Trench box must be kept above the pipe zone or the pipe zone slurried as the shields are raised. In areas where ground movements from excavations need to be small or cannot be tolerated, more robust shoring systems will be required. Those systems could potentially consist of typical cantilevered and braced sheet piling (push in type), cantilevered soldier beam and lagging/plate systems. Other systems can be used such as cantilevered or braided auger cast or jet grouted secant pile walls, slurry diaphragm walls, or cement deep soil-mixed walls. However, those systems typically remain in-place following construction. Lateral pressures applicable for the design will depend on the type of shoring system selected by the contractor, surcharge loads due to construction equipment and traffic, and any dewatering methods that are used. The following geotechnical engineering parameters are provided for consideration in the design of temporary shoring and access pits. Fugro can provide additional guidance for the design of temporary shoring after the contractor has selected the type of shoring to be used for the project. The contractor should review those parameters during design and construction to evaluate whether the parameters are appropriate for the design and provide additional testing, exploration, and or evaluation, as needed. Table 3. Preliminary Soil Parameters for Temporary Shoring Design Total Soil Estimated Estimated Soil Unit Weight Friction Angle Cohesion (Pcf) (m) (Par) Coarse-grained Alluvium 125 32 0 Fine-grained Alluvium(short-term loading) Undrained shear strength=1000 to 1500 psf Fine-grained Alluvium(long-term loading) 110 20 300 17 6R0 RMC Water and Environment Is February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) 3.3.2 Operations To help reduce the potential for caving/sloughing of the temporary sloped excavations from construction equipment and/or traffic vibration, we suggest that the contractor maintain a setback equal to the depth of the excavation. If this setback is not available, then surcharge loading on the shoring will need to be included. This is a general guideline and may need to be modified in the field for specific geotechnical conditions. However, if local soil conditions create a sidewall-stability hazard, the contractor should consult with a geotechnical engineer to evaluate alternative minimum distances needed between the edge of the excavation and construction equipment, vehicle traffic, and stockpiled materials, so that the potential for sidewall instabilities can be minimized. In areas adjacent to shored excavations, surcharge loading from equipment and materials should be considered in the design of the temporary shoring. 3.4 TRENCHLESS CONSTRUCTION 3.4.1 Pipe Bursting We understand that trenchless construction methods may be used for pipeline upsizing near the bottom of the system (MH-145 to MH-025). Recommendations for temporary excavation provided above are applicable to access pit excavations. Pipe bursting has effects on the surrounding environments, including potential ground displacement especially in areas with inadequate or minimal soil cover. The potential for ground displacement depends primarily on: degree of upsizing, type and compaction level of the existing soil around the pipe, and depth of bursting (USACE, 2001). In the area where pipe bursting is proposed, the soils are coarse- grained or granular deposits generally consisting of loose to dense silty and clayey sand. These conditions were discussed with pipe bursting contractor IPR-West/Repipe (Personal Communication, January 17, 2014). IPR-West/Repipe indicated that pneumatic methods are problematic in sandy soils because the hammer action can cause settlement around the pipezone. Static bursting methods they stated, although slower and less productive, are often better suited for sandy soils; and pipe bursting is generally good for clayey soils, not ideal for sandy soils, and bad for rock. Review of the subsurface exploration data in the southern end of the proposed project area indicate silty and clayey sand with varying amounts of gravel to depths of about 31.5 feet. Historical explorations presented in our preliminary report (Fugro, 2013) also make note of a small amount of gravel (10%) and few cobbles to 6 inches in diameter. Groundwater was encountered during our recent field exploration at elevations above or near the pipeline invert. 3.4.2 Monitoring of Trenchless Construction Ground settlement or heaving could occur from excavations and pipe bursting operations. The proposed equipment, procedures, and the contractor's quality control procedures should be selected and the work performed in a manner that does not adversely 18 6R0 RMC Water and Environment M February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) impact the existing road surface or other infrastructure. As such, care should be taken to determine required ground deformation tolerances and develop procedures for construction operations for the various types of infrastructure above or adjacent to the work. The owners of the existing infrastructure may have construction constraints and/or requirements for the type of work proposed, and special provisions pertaining to construction methods and monitoring should be anticipated. The project specifications should require the contractor to submit a detailed plan of the monitoring program and pipe bursting procedures. Although unlikely considering the depth of cover above the pipe, if deformations from pipe bursting are detected, modifications to the work may be required to prevent excessive settlement or heave. If the heave or settlement exceeds acceptable levels, then mitigation and repair to the roadway, sidewalks or other improvements, may be required. 3.5 FILL MATERIALS 3.5.1 General Fill Fill, backfill, and embankment materials shall be suitable selected or processed clean, fine earth, rock, or sand, and free from grass, roots, brush, or other vegetation; contamination; or deleterious material. On the basis of the data from our explorations and review of previous soil borings, we estimate that a large percentage of the on-site soils in the upper reaches of the proposed project area where open-cut construction techniques are planned should meet the above criteria for general fill. 3.5.2 Imported Fill Imported fill materials may be used for general fill or select fill (bedding, pipe zone, trench backfill), provided that the imported fill satisfies the requirements for its intended use. Imported fill material should be evaluated by the geotechnical engineer to verify suitability for its intended use. 3.5.3 Bedding and Pipe Zone Materials Bedding and pipe zone backfill consist of material placed beneath and around the pipe. Unless OCSD or other agencies have more stringent requirements, soil materials used for pipe bedding should consist of imported granular soils with a sand equivalent of at least 30 and should meet the Greenbook requirements for pipe bedding and pipe zone backfill. Backfill should be placed in loose lift thicknesses no greater than 8 inches and mechanically compacted. Bedding and pipe zone backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction as determined from ASTM D1557. Bedding should extend at least 12 inches below the pipe and extend at least 12 inches above the pipe. 19 6R0 RMC Water and Environment M February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) 02 The trench width should be sufficient to allow compaction equipment to operate between the pipe springline and trench wall. We recommend that jetting or flooding of pipe zone materials not be allowed. 3.5.4 Trench Backfill Material Trench backfill consists of material placed above the pipe zone backfill and, in paved areas, extends to the base of the pavement structural section. Unless OCSD or other agencies have more stringent requirements, soil materials used for pipe trench backfill should consist of granular soils with a sand equivalent of at least 20 and should meet the Greenbook requirements for trench backfill. Alternatively, 2-sack sand cement slurry can be used for trench backfill, if approved by RMC and the OCSD. The upper 12 inches of trench backfill placed below the asphalt concrete pavement should consist of asphalt base course (ABC) followed by 2.5 feet compacted sub base material compacted to 95 percent relative compaction.. Placement of this material should be in accordance with Standards of Orange County Sanitation District (Standard Drawing S-010) as appropriate, and Greenbook specifications. In general, backfill should be moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum, placed in loose lift thicknesses no greater than 8 inches, and mechanically compacted. Trench backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction, as determined from ASTM D1557. We recommend that jetting or flooding of pipe trench backfill materials not be allowed. We anticipate that some of the onsite granular soils within the open-cut portion of the project will meet the minimum sand equivalent requirements for trench backfill. However, some selective screening and processing of the soils may be required. 3.5.5 Backfill and Other Loads on Pipes Backfill loads on the pipes will depend on the pipe type (i.e., rigid or flexible), geometrical conditions (embankment or trench configuration), depth of backfill, and on the characteristics of the backfill and in situ soils. For design purposes, we recommend that a total unit weight of 125 pcf be used to estimate backfill loads. Appropriate pipe design references should be consulted to determine other pipe design parameters. Other external loads on the pipes come from construction activities, loads related to traffic, or other post-construction land uses. The pipes should be designed to resist the imposed loads with an added factor of safety and for an appropriate limiting deflection. The pipe may be subjected to surcharge pressure line loads and point loads due to construction activities and traffic, and those loading conditions should also be considered in the design of the pipe. 20 6R0 RMC Water and Environment Is February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) 02 3.5.6 Pipeline Uplift Considerations Portions of the proposed pipelines may be subjected to hydrostatic uplift pressure from groundwater when the pipelines are empty. We recommend that the potential for uplift of the pipelines be considered. Because shallow groundwater conditions have been reported in the past, we recommend that the depth to groundwater be assumed at a depth of about 10 feet bgs when evaluating pipeline uplift. Uplift resistance can be provided by the weight of soil above the pipe and the soil frictional resistance. The weight of soil above the pipeline should be assumed to be 125 pcf for soil above the water level and 60 pcf (buoyant weight) for soils below the ground water level. The ultimate frictional resistance of a rectangular soil prism (soil-soil interface) for saturated (undrained) conditions can be assumed to be 15 pounds psf per foot of depth. 3.5.6 Modulus of Soil Reaction Flexible and semi-rigid pipes are typically designed to withstand a certain amount of deflection from the applied earth loads. Those deflections can be estimated with the aid of equations developed by Howard (1995). We suggest an E'-value of 2,500 pounds per square inch for project design. The E'-value is for a combined trench/pipeline system that includes a minimum of 24 inches of compacted pipe-zone material around the pipeline and is applicable for use with the Reclamation equation (Howard, 2006). 3.6 VAULTS AND MANHOLES 3.6.1 Allowable Bearing Capacity and Static Settlement We anticipate proposed vaults and manholes will consist of below-grade structures with concrete walls and concrete foundations. The foundation level for the structures is anticipated to be about 10 to 25 feet below the existing ground surface. On the basis of our experience with similar structures, in our opinion, the proposed vaults can be supported on concrete mats founded on the undisturbed native alluvium, or to at least 90 percent relative compaction, as determined from ASTM D1557, if disturbed. We recommend a maximum allowable (net) bearing pressure of 2,000 psf be used for the design of the proposed foundations. The maximum allowable bearing pressure is considered applicable to a mat-type foundation slab and can be increased by one-third when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. We estimate that total static settlements of the proposed manholes and vault structures will be less than 1 inch. 3.6.2 Uplift Resistance Vaults and manholes could be subject to uplift forces given the groundwater conditions observed along the alignment. The magnitude of the uplift pressure acting on the vault Will depend on the groundwater level at the structure location. Based on the explorations conducted for the project and on historic data, groundwater levels of 10 feet bgs should be considered. 21 6R0 RMC Water and Environment ON February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) Although unlikely, we cannot rule out the possibility of groundwater conditions changing over time due to land use changes, groundwater pumping, or seasonal conditions. In our opinion, vaults, manholes, and piping should be checked for uplift assuming that groundwater is present at a depth of about 10 feet bgs. For this scenario, we recommend a minimum factor of safety of at least 1.25 be used. The uplift forces may be resisted by: 1) the gross weight of the structure; 2) friction between soil interfaces for structures with footing extensions; and 3) the weight of soil located above footing extensions beyond the outside walls of the structures. The frictional resistance can be estimated to increase linearly with depth. We recommend an ultimate frictional resistance of 35 psf per foot of depth be used for soil interfaces above the groundwater level. For soil below the groundwater level, the rate of increase in the frictional resistance should be assumed at 15 psf per foot of depth. If footing extensions are used, the potential wedge of soil providing resistance to uplift should be considered to be bounded by the outside walls of the structure and a vertical plane extending up from the edge of the footing extension. A unit weight of 125 pcf should be used to estimate the weight of unsaturated soil above the footing extensions. For soils below the groundwater level, a unit weight of 60 pcf should be used. 3.6.3 Lateral Earth Pressures Static Earth Pressures. Retaining structures that are unable to rotate or deflect laterally (e.g., restrained below-grade or basement walls) are referred to as restrained or rigid walls. We have assumed that the below grade walls for vaults and manholes Will be rigid and should be designed for at-rest conditions. Lateral earth pressures (equivalent fluid weights) for design of the proposed vault and miscellaneous walls are provided in Table 4 - Equivalent Fluid Weights for Developing Lateral Earth Pressures. Table 4. Equivalent Fluid Weights for Estimating Lateral Earth Pressures Equivalent Fluid Weights(pounds,pcf) Backfill Slope At-Rest Conditions Inclination Behind Wall Drained Undrained Level Granular Backfill 60 95 The equivalent fluid weight for undrained conditions accounts for the buoyant unit weight of soil and includes the unit weight of water. In general, we recommend that undrained conditions be assumed below a depth of 10 feet unless perimeter subsurface drainage devices are provided. If the drainage devices are constructed, drained conditions can be assumed above the drainage devices and undrained conditions should be used below that level. 22 6R0 RMC Water and Environment February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) 02 The estimated equivalent fluid pressures should be applied to a vertical plane passing through the backmost extension of the wall. The height of the vertical plane should extend from the point where the vertical plane intersects the ground surface down to the elevation of the lowest retaining wall foundation. We recommend materials placed as backfill adjacent to the manholes or vaults consist of onsite or imported granular soil with less than 30 percent passing the No. 200 sieve and have a sand equivalent of at least 20. Where manholes are backfilled with slurry, the slurry should be placed in stages to avoid creating uplift for the manhole. The manhole should be designed for the equivalent fluid weight of slurry, approximately 130 pcf. 3.6.4 Sliding and Passive Resistance Sliding resistance generated through a concrete-on-soil interface may be computed by multiplying the total dead weight structural loads by the coefficient 0.35. Passive resistance developed from lateral bearing of shallow foundation elements bearing against level compacted fills or undisturbed native soils can be determined using an equivalent fluid weight of 350 pcf for drained conditions and 150 pcf for undrained conditions (i.e. below the groundwater level). Frictional resistance and passive pressure may be used together without reduction in evaluating foundation sliding. A minimum factor of safety of 1.5 is recommended for foundation overturning and sliding. 3.7 SOIL CHEMISTRY AND CORROSION 3.7.1 Test Results One soil sample obtained from B-3 was provided to Cooper Testing Laboratories for resistivity, pH, chloride, and sulfate testing. Test results are presented below in Table 5. The laboratory test report is included in Appendix B. Table 5. Summary of Chemical Test Results Drill USCS Classification Depth Sulfate Chloride Resistivity pH Hole (feet) (percent) (ppm) (ohm-cm) B-3 SC 10 0.0067 484 789 7.9 3.7.2 Corrosion and Cement Considerations The resistivity values suggest that existing onsite sandy soil materials are corrosive to underground steel. If applicable, the test results should be evaluated by a corrosion engineer to determine how underground utilities should be protected from corrosion. 23 6R0 RMC Water and Environment February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) The cement type should be selected with consideration of the sulfate content of the tested soils. Available sulfate content data suggest that, per Table 4-3-1 of ACI 318 (2005), Type II cement can be used for concrete that will be in contact with onsite soils. 4.0 LIMITATIONS 4.1 REPORT USE This letter report has been prepared for the exclusive use of RMC Water and Environment and the Orange County Sanitation District for the design and construction of the proposed District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project in Newport Beach, California. The findings, conclusions, and recommendations presented herein were prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices of the project region. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. Although information contained in this report may be of some use for other purposes, it may not contain sufficient information for other parties or uses. If any changes are made to the project as described in this report, the conclusions and recommendations in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and the conclusions and recommendations of this report are modified or validated in writing by Fugro. 4.2 POTENTIAL VARIATION IN SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Earth materials can vary in type, strength, and other geotechnical properties between points of observations and exploration. The soil borings performed for this study were spaced along the proposed pipeline alignment, as shown on Figure 2 and Chart 1. Therefore, there is a potential for variation in the consistency, density, and strength/hardness of the materials. There is also potential for oversized materials (greater than 8 inches in diameter), perched water, zones of poorly consolidated soils to be present, or other conditions not indicated in the logs of borings. Additionally, groundwater and soil moisture conditions also can vary seasonally or for other reasons. Moreover, we do not and cannot have a complete knowledge of the subsurface conditions underlying the site. If significant variation in the geologic conditions is observed during grading, we recommend that the geotechnical engineer, in conjunction with the project designer, evaluate the impact of those variations on the project design. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the findings at the points of exploration, interpolation, and extrapolation of information between and beyond the points of observation, and are subject to confirmation (to the extent possible) based on the conditions revealed during construction. 4.3 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS We performed Organic Vapor Meter (OVM) readings during the collection of soil samples, however, this report does not provide information regarding the presence of hazardous/toxic materials in the soil, surface water, groundwater, or atmosphere. 24 6R0 RMC Water and Environment February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) 4.4 LOCAL PRACTICE In performing our professional services, we have used generally accepted geologic and geotechnical engineering principles and have applied the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable geotechnical engineers currently practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, express or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report. 4.5 PLAN REVIEW We recommend that Fugro be provided the opportunity to review and comment on the geotechnical aspects of any project plans and specifications prepared for the project before they are finalized. The purpose of that review will be to evaluate if the recommendations in this report have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications. 4.6 CONSTRUCTION MONITORING Users of this report should recognize that the construction process is an integral design component with respect to the geotechnical aspects of a project, and that geotechnical engineering is inexact due to the variability of natural and man-induced processes, which can produce unanticipated or changed conditions. Proper geotechnical observation and testing during construction is imperative in allowing the geotechnical engineer the opportunity to verify assumptions made during the design process. Therefore, we recommend that Fugro be retained during pipeline construction to observe compliance With project plans and specifications and to recommend design changes, if needed, in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated. 25 6R0 RMC Water and Environment M February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) 5.0 REFERENCES American Concrete Institute (2005), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary 318-05. American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) (latest edition), ASTM Caltrans Annual Book of Standards. California Building Code (2010), "2010 California Building Code," published by the International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, California. California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG, 1997), Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Anaheim and Newport Beach 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Orange County, Califomia, Seismic Hazard Zone Report 03. (2009), Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning, Newport Beach Quadrangle, Orange County, California. Fault Map, City of Newport Beach (2007). Fugm Consultants, Inc. (2013), Preliminary Geotechnical Letter Report, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project, Orange County Sanitation District Project No. 6-17, dated August 12. "Greenbook" Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (2006), Published by BNI Building News, Los Angeles, California. Howard, A.K., Kinney, L., and Fuerst, R. (1995), "Prediction of Flexible Pipe Deflection,' prepared for U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Service Center, Denver, Colorado, January 31. Howard, Amster (2006), "The Reclamation E' Table, 25 Years Later," Paper presented at Plastics Pipe XIII International Conference,Washington DC, October 2-5. Law/Crandall (1997) Report of Geotechnical Investigation, SR55 (Newport Boulevard)/SR1 (Pacific Coast Highway) Interchange, Newport Beach, California. Leroy Crandall Associates (1971) Report of Foundation Investigation, Proposed Parking Structure for the Hoag Memorial Hospital, 301 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California. Nadim, F. and Whitman, R.V. (1992), Seismic Analysis and Design of Retaining Walls, ASME, OMAE, Volume II, Safety and Reliability. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (1926), Subpart B - Excavations, Table V:2-1 "Allowable Slopes." 26 6R0 RMC Water and Environment M February 18,2013(Project No.04.61130008) 02 Seed, H.B., and Whitman, R.V. (1970), Design of Earth Retaining Structures for Dynamic Loads, ASCE Specialty Conference on Lateral Stresses in the Ground and Design of Earth Retaining Structures, Ithaca, New York, pp. 103-147. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2001), Guidelines for Pipe Bursting, TTC Technical Report #2001.02. USGS (2008a), htto://Qeohazards.usgs.gov/dusion/hazfaults search/hf search main.cfm (2008b), httos://geohazards.usgs.govideaggint/2008/ 27 Bun FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. FIGURES RMC Water and EnviornmentGRO Project No.04.61130008 n a'onw 117'550w I17'50nw Fauntain m Maril,eC Vally Aa Scat cKa ID Cal ralbwl Ave W M,s—thur Blvd 55 ee1'O°° Tuslm ve Ellin Av l^ v oath m call dN� fJ' G ar field Ava @° ° Sxachn $ Me "�° ilv uW' S n Bakst 1 ,n`SI Pk ya club Huntington m LL Beach Adams Av M,°aV ®' u CostB ray Mesa „ ^ n _ Atlanta Ave Partu< 3 rnity or Upper y Newport Bay I PROJECT a caino my OI rma-Iry n, AREA a Dr SBO°,ta c° i N t F� a Beach >> 16 Sa, ° $an J"WnN,Ip RO Ne wpO/I Corona d 0ai Dal Mar u °fl Al Fele an O 441 Nab Cry 2 11s'09"W 117'55tl"W 19°500w Source:Street Map Provided by ESRI. N Site Location: Latitude: 33.626540° Longitude: -117.926469° 1:120,000 0 3,000 6,000 12,000 ®Feet VICINITY MAP District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project Newport Beach, California FIGURE 1 4e. / r ''•y�" ,.�'Of! t•y '^o./ � �\ 1. . . , v �' ewe', ♦ ^ _ - \w��\\w ' .ilr �• / - `� � + - ,�Ii'�II� . M � A �4 .� • n � T9'J{Iyp' L_ '<i� - ? e4,.� / �� vim/ r y {� 'Y• P�� r?� /l - • �� �{ f` r.�. Hi: op { AF i; 'af ,. tJv � ' . :. c '7A'tjljFa/� � ' • !� j '�,t w +t.W - ,� ~f A 'Ilk >>� �'d\ ��i/�' �fuC'�iC-•6 Y��ly y� °' 'stlAy`2j+ t.#$! Ky. r �� � , •. ® 4i�I J9T{� .(iC3q'�el ,� ' � 'R , � 7 `� ♦ , � � O�i�.'�'�_•�� tdw �. Pm or; e �� �4 a y1. ,•A y� y.i� *� ��: �46 11. � �- �� '� � � � ill �� n� ►l�t� tiF di b�®' � 'I ... �_ J ';�;� d .• • Bun FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. CHARTS 2178000 2177500 2177000 2176500 2176000 2175500 2175000 2174500 2174000 RELOCATE MH CLEAN AND E IH-i A yP B-2 ' S,�Q�P� �p�pp •e D m * m+cl OO h ABAN-MHOpFN B-3 MH-170 C TVCp LI--ram„ MN- N 60"0 -1 BA MH 16 Q MH-175 Q H-15 an Y .r._ B.Sw X4' B R.O.W. mn=3�c MH-180 *W"uy?T G + o°' + + i + + + + + 1-140 9. RCB r' SL i NEWO -135 0�9 1 pEN CUT VCp 2 B�7 � # #s > MH-0098-0025 LewlD ran dall-B-12(1997) -0020 MH-185 J %j EWPORT BLV EB ST J . se C OQ N � V a 0 0 x 2176000 2177500 2177000 2176500 2176000 2175500 2175000 2174500 2174000 A A' 110 N60W S22W 110 100 100 EXISTING GROUN 90 90 CL N AND LINE REALIGN AN OPEN CUT OPEN CUT PIPE BURST 80 80 70 259 T &2 N.T.S. APPROXIMATE 70 60 EXISTING GROUND ¢ 60 J 12 zt B-4 B-fi o w 8 w 50 EXISTING w 50 ILL! ,SEWER LINE CP a. �a 9 ' B-7 w 40 w LU 11 w LL ICH VCP 260 LF 18-INCH VCP 451 LF 15-IN H VCP 219 LF iSINCH CI 21 `� 4 <38, to O�' `tt' as. u z 30 30 Z . . . q r 20 < ,. a 20 IF, Q 327 L 15-INCH EXTRA 350 LF iSINCH TRA 354.5 F 15-INCH EXTRA 13 j ILL 10 380 L 12-NCH EXTRA Sid LF 15-NCH EXTRA 265 16-INCH CIP `a> 10 24-IL5t�l H D STRE 9GT A VCP STRENGT VCP 4 D DIP -10 10 omo i;� w mp t a N O« oar �� z �o� z ^� '° - o_ _20 -20 0 - ¢ m o 0 «> .m . . p - p w _'z 'z z -30 f= rc Z Z Z O >z 2 z >z Z 2 « 22 S E Z>z O F Z Z w > 'z� ° rvS> '> C N Sim rc > >> F=N P w w w r o r 0 o P ; o w z� w 66 yZN Z ZN N NZN p p d. N N zN ,q2N 2N jU NZV, O f9 N mZN >i F >i Z -40 as %aa LLie oaa o as f a au n _ 0 a uu uu uu " Z. wa H " 8 o:aa m . -40 » > �>> > _> .0 �>> �» » rc m ->G rc rc w - » �_ H o S =.Q po - o _ b� 'a -50 bins�� Fire Su �Bh � ' �ti""" -50 35 ft -60 -60 140 ft Vertical Exaggeration=4.OX 5 n This document may only be used for the purpose for which It was commissioned and In accordance with Me terms of engagement for that commission.Unauthorized use of this document In any formform w whatsoever FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. Is prohibited. Legend ��RD 700 South Flower Street e 2116 Soil Types Los An Los Angeles, -3 0001] GEODETIC INFORMATION Lll As-built Boring Location ��_ Tel:(213) SPHEROID: GR5198o ® Lean CLAY(CL) Silty SAND(SM) <18> SPT N-Value -A_ Fax:(213)]88-3526 SEMI-MAJOR AXIS: 6,378,137.000 Approximate Boring Location www.fugreconsultants.com SEMI-MINOR AXIS: 6,356,752.314 Z�(A b others Law/Crandall 1 1 Ground Water Level y INVERSE FLATTENING: 298.25]22f01 y ( [ 971, 1977] ® Fat CLAY(CH) Gravelly Silty SAND(SM) ECCENTRICITY°: 0.006694380 PROJECTION: LAMBERT CONFORMAL CONIC ` Existing Man Hole ZONE: STATE PLANE VI 5 2 LATITUDE OF ORIGIN: CALIFORNIACALIF88] FALSE EASTING 6561666.666667 Proposed New Man Hole � Fat CLAY with SAND(CH) � Asphaltic Concrete SITE EXPLORATION PLAN AND PROFILE : FALSE NORTHING: 1640416.66666] Coordinate End California Stale Plane,Zone VI,Feet ■ Sandy Fat CLAY(CH) District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project ew MB60 73 Proposed Man Hole Relocation Lill Base Material Atlanta Ave P.F - Silt ML Newport Beach, California Sewer Line Alignment ■ ( ) '' Upper o° . — Clean/Line n NewPno ■ Elastic Silt with Send(MH) Bay Existing 0 280 560 — E l PROJECT .rni-;�;, AREA o p° — Open Cut Clayey SAND(SC) Fast ss e- Do°n,c° 4 Pipe Burst Gravelly,Clayey SAND(SC) B N 1 3V°4 c NO: DATE: DESCRIPTION: DRAWN: CHKD: APPR: 3 Beach 1 Nov.2013 Draft Report KWS MOP MOP f° San J°aq,yn I1r 2 Nesl Corona m Bay Del 3 Sources:Esri,DeLonne,NAVTEQ,U6`6S, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN,Esri Japan, METI,Esn China(Hong LCHART NO.: Kong),Esri(Thailand),TomTOm,2013 Resort JOB NUMBER: 04.61130008 0 -ruago FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION RMC Water and Environment al Project No. 04.61130008 CLASSIFICATION AND MATERIAL SYMBOLS BLOW COUNT MA1pNgVsim MAIORGRQUPNAMES Number of blows required to drive sampler each of three Elm intervals,as PER ASTM D24S3416 ANDMATERIALSYMEOLS measured in Me field(uncorrected). AnSPT hammer(14011 ,falling 301 was used unless otM1arwise noted an Me baring log. For example: fireve. GW R� •+'• Well-Greded GRAVEL Cleanwn 5% �. Bid Men SY Description GRAVELS time GP Poorly Graded j r5eripeenely Iowa for fret,second,and third interval, ro • GRAVEL 8 _ R. m vow cravats with GM .•,. '• SILTY GRAVEL 35 35 thows for the first Interval. 50 does for the first 3 Inches of Solt" Me second interval. Lack d Mind value implies that dming w 9 re+u to%ilea was stopped 3 Inches into the second Interest. eo GL • •• CLAYEY GRAVEL K Si WOH 'WOH'indicates Mat Me wiTy oftbe hammerwas sufficient C) o SW % Well-Greded SAND WOH to advance Me sampler over lkeflrsttwolntervats. 5dows w SF clean sane 5 were required to advance the sampler over Me third interval, to c lase Nan 5% 0 SANDS n"g SP Ready Graded SAND NVALUE was-O The N-Value represents Me blowcount for the last 12 inches of the sample dries if iwm.v 9andawM SM +. SILTY SAND three a-inch intervals were driven. N-value presented is independentof impact ore roan energy. If 50 hammer blows were insufficient to days through either the second or 12%fines Me third interval,Me total number of blown and total length coven are reported SC + CLAYEYSAND (excluding the first interval). "ref'lreferan indicates that 50 blows were insufficient M now through Me first 6-inch interval. MIL SILT Parenthesis indicate that an apprommete comedion has been applied for Len-SPT SILTS AND CLAYS dove samplers. Fire example,a factor of that is commonly used b adjust blow m counts obtained using a finch outside diameter modified California sampler to LL Lean CLAY correspond to Standak Pefereraal Test. to 0 Wb Liquid umlt Less Men 50% w oix Q OL r ORGANIC SILT UMMNED SHEAR STRENGTH <Z @F Avalueofundrained shear strength is reported Thevaluelsfdloeedbyaleser K 6° MH Elastic SILT code Indicating the type of test that was performed,as follows: w „§ SILTS AND CLAYS U - Underlined Compresolon CH Fat CLAY Q - Unconsolidated Unchained TriaMal T Torvane uquld Limn meter Lien son% P - Pocket Penetrometer ON ORGANIC CLAY M - "mature Vane F - e Field Van R R-value HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS FIT Peat or Highly Organic Sills OTHER TESTS Notes OTHER MATERAL SYMBOLS Fiend or laboratory tests without a dedicated column on the boring log are reported Classification of soils on the Coring logs is In In the Other Tests column. A letter code is used to indicate the type of test, For general accordance with ASTM D2488,or cocain tests,a value representing the test result Is also provided Typical letter D2481 K appropriate laboratory data are codes are as follows. Additional codes may be used Refer to the report text and available. Debtls or phase Fill Me laboratory testing resuks for additional information. The geologic formation Is noted in Cold but at Me by of interpreted Interval on Me boon,logs. p%g-r PalemeM k - Permeability(cm/s)with Aggregate Con - Consolidation Be. Gs - Specific Gravity SAMPLER TYPE MA - Particle Size Analysis El - Expansion Index �SPT Modified Modified OW - Organic Vapor Meter (Driam) California California WATER LEVEL SYMBOLS INCREASING MOISTURE 1-3/8'ID (Driven) (Darken) TOO 2-3/8'ID 1-9/S'ID 2 Initial water level CONTENT 3- OD 2-In'OD Z Final water level Dry Shelby Tube MM1er Bamel Os[e"e" h Seepage encountered Mast IIIII (PlnM1ed) �(R. cut) m(Piston) Wet 2-7/8'ID 2-7/8'ID 3'OD CONSISTENCY OF COHESIAM�WNLESSS SOIL OF 101 Geobarrel Rock Core Vibrecore COHESIVE SOIL COHESIONLESS SqL �2-7Wt(Rotari cut) See Wr See to U2-]/8'ID See log fon size See log bslze CONSISTENCY UNIXNNNED SHEAR STRENGTX APPARENT NNAWE (KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT) DENSITY (Pushed) log Wr St. All dfram See lo9lar derails Medium SCR 0.50 M0 50 1.0 iuma 0 nee SO '. Note: Refer to te#ot report for additpnal details or other sampler types. sum 1LM2A Derxse WW49 Very SIM 2.0M4.0 Very DeLae >49 Hand >4.0 Note: In absence of test data, consistency has been esfimeted based an manual observation. TERMS AND SYMBOLS USED ON BORING LOGS PLATE A-1 A-1 RMC Water and EnvironmentGRG Project No. 04.61130008 Shed 1 d 1 w O�- LOCATION: e a -6 N 33AW15 W 117.a2604 rn F � �ui SURFACE EL: 66.OR+1- (rd.NAVD88 tlaWm) c Ow Q Qz_Z 5O W mN 7O �2 WW NNKQ W iew ao ao h 5� °zi�— w m Em m ma ze m MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 03 3m e;4 on ml o ARTIFICIAL FILL(at) .'. Asphall Concrete(7.5") .............. .............. ................... .............. Base6.5" .............. .............. ................... .............. m n Silly SAND(SM): dark yellowish b.,dry ""'_ _ 83 - s ' ' 0 6 nA �- ALLUVIUM(Oal) 1 = PP R 80 1a 1s' CLAYEY SAND(SC): medium dense,dark Morn,dry """"""" """"""" ................... .....MN...... .............. .............. ................... .............. 0 8 10 9 n. 0 g 12 18' .............. .............. ................... .............. R N p =..ILP 6 ..121....10.. .............. .................. 1(b1. 8 (B) 1a• v t5 1 m SANDY Lean CLAY(CL): medium stiff to stff,dark boon,d7 ______________ _________26 16 lop VM=Lipp mi 5o 4 ' td• . .............. .............. .............. .............. ................... .............. 4. .............. .............. ................... .............. .............. .............. ................... .............. � 46 20-�. a a i Isl a CLAYEY SAND(SC): 1py loose,dark brain,we 26 35 VM=1.1 PP 2 ......... .............. ................... .............. NOTES: 1.Terms and symbols defined on Plate Al. Y E 8' 3 9 S 3 5 BORING DEPTH:21.5 it HAMMERTYPE: Automatic Tip BACKFILL Cutlings RIG TYPE: CME-75 DEPTH TO WATER: 20.Ofi DRILLED BY: Marini Dulling FIELDWORK DATE:OdoW 15,2013 LOGGED BY: L.Khalkhali,EIT DRILLING METHOD:7.25-in.dia.Hollm Stem Auger CHECKED BY: M.Pdlard,PE LOG OF BORING NO. B-1 District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Newport Beach, California A-2 RMC Water and EnvironmentGRG Project No. 04.61130008 Shed 1 of 1 w O�- LOCATION: e a -6 N 33.62981 W 117.92585 N F � �ij SURFACEEL: 60oft+1- (rd.NAVD88datum) c Ow w i is Qz_ Q Z 5O W mN 7O �2 WW W Sw >rc w iew ¢p h 5� °zi�- w O Em m ma zo W. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION O3 3O e;4 on o.3 �mml o ARTIFICIAL FILL(ai) Asphalt Concrete(6.5") .............. .............. ................... .............. se a 6.5" .............. .............. ................... .............. �Bas ..w .............. .............. ................... ...... a Silty SAND with a�el SM : dark brown,d " ... sa .;...? ALLUVIUM(Oal) .............. .............. ................... .............. s 1 Silty SAND(SM): medium dense to dense,dark brown,dry to wet pp sd 0 11 21 8: R ': .............. .............. ................... .............. m e' 0 so 10 - - s J ]d -moist,poorly graded send Mth silt at 10' T w-a6pp P19 2 18. .............. .............. ................... .....M4...... a48 - .............. .............. ................... .............. o 'es soli M -wet,dense st 12.5' A14....16.. .............. .................. W-D5p iso >i 4e .' : .; .............. .............. ................... .............. $ is 3 NOTES: z1.Terms and symbols darned on Plate Al. 8E ei 8 u 3 9 S 3 5 BORING DEPTH:16.5 ft HAMMERTYPE: Automatic Tip BACKFILL Cull RIG TYPE: CME-75 DEPTH TO WATER: 12.0ft DRILLED BY: Martini DHIIIng FIELDWORK DATE:October 15,2013 LOGGED BY: L.Khalkhali,EIT DRILLING METHOD:7.25-in.dia.Hollm Stem Auger CHECKED BY: M.Pollard,PE LOG OF BORING NO. B-2 District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Newport Beach, California A-3 RMC Water and EnvironmentGRG Project No. 04.61130008 Shed 1 d 1 w O�- LOCATION: e a -6 N 33.62872 W 117.92648 N F ref >- SURFACEEL 50oft-1- (reI.NAVD88datum) c Ow Q Zw 5EO mW mmNo. 7>Orc w �ie2 W N Ct� F5� z Wo N.O w 9a w O zo MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 03 e;4 on QK° Qi m�- W o ARTIFICIAL FILL taq VM=0app �- Asphalt Concrete(B.) .............. .............. ................... .............. 4e ... , 1 Base 8' .............. .............. ................... .............. m EE ' .............. .............. .............. ... a --:�: SILTY SAND with GRAVEL SM : dads Iloxish born,d ..... ........... 46 -: ALLUVIUM(ml) .............. .............. ................... .............. . 4 CLAYEY SAND(SC): medium dense,dark boon,dry 115 1 - VV tlu 0 20 (zal is .............. .............. ................... .............. R S m 42 p e 19 A -yallovish born,moist al T .............. .21.......... .................. 1(M iA-8p p te' °a 40 m 2 117 17 VM=1A v.. SN n a 4 (23) t6• 5 a " M ]B. -caret at 12.5' .............. .24.......... .................. 1( -A,fip e' is 6material becomes CWreer-goahad at 15' 110.._18.. .............. ................... VM-1Epp Eli Ir NOTES: z 1.Terms and symbols darned on Plate Al. UJ 8E ei 8 u 3 9 S 3 5 BORING DEPTH:16.5 ft HAMMERTYPE: Automatic Tip BACKFILL Curl RIGTYPE: CME-75 DEPTH TO WATER: 14.Oft DRILLED BY: Martini Dulling FIELDWORK DATE:Odober 15,2013 LOGGED BY: L.Khalkhali,EIT DRILLING METHOD:7.25-in.dia.Hollm Stem Augsr CHECKED BY: M.Pollard,PE LOG OF BORING NO. B-3 District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Newport Beach, California A-4 RMC Water and Environment TuGRO Project No. 04.61130008 Shed 1 d 1 w O�- LOCATION: e a F 6 N 33.62798 W 117.9269 rn F Dui SURFACEEL 50oft-1- (rd.NAVD88ddrn) c Ow w Qz_ Q Z 5O W mN 7O �2 WW NN �� F KQ W w a� a �rc >rc w ie ao 9. a w O Em m ma ze m MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 03 3O e;4 on ml 0 ARTIFICIAL FILL(V ' Pspha,Concrete(8.5') .............. .............. ................... .............. aeBase 6' .............. .............. ................... .............. a CLAYEY SAND(SC): dark b.,dry _ as .............. .............. ................... .............. 2 ALLUVIUM(Oat) 61 39 1. _ . pp p s Fat CLAY CH medium stiff to .............. .............. ................... ......... . . R ( ): verY stiff,yelloxish brown,tlry 3 .............. .............. ................... .............. d .............. .............. ................... .............. 0 ap to 111 0 3 19) - 66 55 2.0P VM=o.3 3g died,brown belm 10' pp n 9 18' .............. .............. ................... . a38 .............. .............. ................... .............. X_ 9 a g .............. ..9a......... ..........1.SP... 1(b1=L.lp u 8' 15 3 -Wry stiff,with omde staining at 15' 43 3o P VM=o.epp m3< 0 p (9I 18• .............. .............. ................... .............. .............. .............. ................... .............. g32 .............. .............. ................... .............. IJ .............. .............. ................... .............. ' 30 20 3 0 2 5 8 NOTES: 1.Terms and symbds defined on Plate Al. Y E 8' 3 9 S 3 5 BORING DEPTH:21.5 It HAMMER TYPE: Automatic Tip BACKFILL Cutlings RIG TYPE: CME-75 DEPTH TO WATER: Not Enmuntered DRILLED BY: Martini Dulling FIELDWORK DATE:Odober 15,2013 LOGGED BY: L.Khalkhali,Err DRILLING METHOD:7.25-in.dia.HOIIm Stem Auger CHECKED BY: M.Pdlard,PE LOG OF BORING NO. B-4 District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Newport Beach, California A-5 RMC Water and EnvironmentGRG Project No. 04.61130008 Shed 1 of 1 w O�- LOCATION: e a F 6 N 33.62724 W 117.9273 rn F SURFACEEL 48.OR+1- (reI.NAVD88daWm) c Ow Q Qz_Z 5O W mN 7O �2 WW NNKQ W iew ao ao h 5� °zi�— w O Em m ma ze m MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 03 3O e;4 on ml 0 ARTIFICIAL FILL(aq Psph,"Concrete(T) .............. .............. ................... .............. °s Base T' .............. .............. ................... .............. r CLAYEY SAND(SC): medium dense,can,b ,dry .............. .............. ..................JISAM.e22 sZ.1 , o a le) �- ALLUVIUM Pal) 1......... ................... .......... P.. R °z ra' Fat CLAY vdM sand(CH): medium stiff to very stiff,dark brown,dryto """"""" ""' smoist .............. .............. ................... .............. d .............. .............. ................... .............. 0 3e m E, s z vry still at l0' 76 51 .. 2.5P M=0.1 Gp sIr .............. .............. ...... ........... .............. a36 .............. .............. ................... .............. U..... .. .............. ..........Up.. W-DAP A 6 (to) 10 it ]5. -stiff.with Dude staving d 15' sza i ° 18. .............. .............. ................... .............. .............. .............. ................... .............. 30 .............. .............. ................... .............. .............. .............. ................... .............. E 28 2P P i let 82 74 OAP VM-0.6PP NOTES: 1.Terms and sMbds defined on Plate Al. Y E 8' 3 9 S 3 5 BORING DEPTH:21.5 it HAMMERTYPE: Automatic Trip BACKFILL Cutlings RIGTYPE: CME-75 DEPTH TO WATER: No Enmunlered DRILLED BY: Martini Dulling FIELDWORK DATE:October 15,2013 LOGGED BY: L.103alkhali,Err DRILLING METHOD:7.25-in.dia.Hollm Stem Auger CHECKED BY: M.Pdlard,PE LOG OF BORING NO. B-5 District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Newport Beach, California A-6 RMC Water and EnvironmentGRG Project No. 04.61130008 Shed 1 d 1 w O�- LOCATION: e a F 6 N 33.62605 W 117.9277 rn F � �ui SURFACE EL: 45.OR+/- (rd.NAVD88 tlatum) c Ow Q Qz_Z 5O W mN 7O �2 WW NNKQ W iew ao ai; h 5� °zi�— w m Em m ma zo m MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 03 3c3 e;4 on ml 0 ARTIFICIAL FILL(4 a4 Asphalt Vase 9'Concrete(9') .............. .............. ................... .............. m .............. .............. ................... .............. n 42 ALLUVIUM(0a1) .............. .............. ................... .............. 6 Elastic SILT wtlh SAND(MH): eery dad,b n,dry .............. .............. ................... .............. 40 s - 2 CLAYEY SAND(SC): nary loose to medium dense,dark brown,dry 49 y 0 9 8 S38 .' .............. .............. ................... .............. 5 u3. .............. .............. ................... .............. 10 .123.... .... .............. ................... .............. R .S 32 ..... ........ �i 30 15 . .. .... . ................... ........ 4 0 15 18. .............. .............. ................... .............. 2. Vs 1q ..10G....21.. .............. ................... .............. 'u 0 6 12 q 26 " . -. .. .............. .............. ................... .............. 2° 31 24 ° j 2 1e' ..... ........ ¢ 33 3 18118...14. .............. ................... .............. ° ] (11) w . ... 5 18- .............. .............. ................... .............. B 18' NOTES: 1.Terms and symbols defined on Plate Al. E 8' 3 9 S 3 5 BORING DEPTH:24.5 R HAMMER TYPE: Automatic TdP BACKFILL Curt RIG TYPE: CME-75 DEPTH TO WATER: 17.5fl DRILLED BY: Marini Dulling FIELDWORK DATE:Odober 14,2013 LOGGED BY: L.Khalkhali,Err DRILLING METHOD:7.25-in.dia.Holim Stem Auger CHECKED BY: M.Pollard,PE LOG OF BORING NO. B-6 District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Newport Beach, California A-7 RMC Water and EnvironmentGRG Project No. 04.61130008 Shed 1 d 1 w O�- LOCATION: e -2. N 33.62473 W 117.92808 vi F � �hu SURFACE EL 40.OR+1- (rd.NAVD88 tlatum) c Ow z w i w Q_ Q Z 50 W mN 7O �2 WW NN o� F KQ W ow >rc w rcw ¢p ao h 5� °zi�— w m Em m ma zo W. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION m3 3m e� on a3 �mml o ARTIFICIAL FILL(4 • Psphalt Concrete(10') .............. .............. ................... .............. seBase 8' .............. .............. ................... .............. ALLUVIUM(Call ..... ss "' SILT(MLI' ri�1. h bhown.dry .............. .............. ................... .............. s :.: s SILTY SAND(SM): medium dense,dark yellowish bro'.m,dry = PP Rs. o zs (z6) 1a. .............. .............. ................... .....M....... d 0 30 10 7 M CLAYEY SAND(SO): medium dense to dense,dark brovm,dry to wet 26 0W=01ppr o iz Ir .............. .............. ................... .............. LN a28 -�'' .............. .............. ................... .............. .............. .............. ................... .............. .............. .............. ................... .............. isdense,with mice gravel al 15' 127 9 VM=Upv mi24 ...v. ii (se) dense, .............. .............. ................... .............. .............. .............. ................... .............. 30 zo 2 40 VM=0.1 PP tt 8' g 1 ..... ...1�..... rc 5 ..117....Y3.. .............. .................. Upix sX 12 Pzl Ir 1g .. .............. .............. ................... .............. p 14 25 p 1 1e -weld 25' 23 ................ VM=0APP .............. .............. ... M9...... E 2 ..... ........ m so 4 91 31 66 46 2DP VM-01 o s te) m Fat CLAY with sand(CH): stiff,dads dive gay,moist - vp FB 18' .............. .............. ................... ......... .... a, NOTES: 1.Terms and symbols darned on Plate Al. 3 9 S 3 5 BORING DEPTH:31.5 ft HAMMER TYPE: Automatic Tip BACKFILL Cutings RIG TYPE: CME-75 DEPTH TO WATER: 25oft DRILLED BY: Martini Drilling FIELDWORK DATE:October 14,2013 LOGGED BY: L Khalkhali,EIT DRILLING METHOD:7.25-in.dia.Hollovi Stem Auger CHECKED BY: M.Pollard,PE LOG OF BORING NO. B-7 District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Newport Beach, California A-8 RMC Water and EnvironmentGRG Project No. 04.61130008 Shed 1 of 1 w O�- LOCATION: e a -6 N 33.623442 W 117.92836 vi F � �uf >- SURFACEEL: 34.OR+l- (reI.NAVD88dalam) c Ow w Q Qz_Z 5O W UN 7O �2 WWao Nai; N �� F KQ W w a� arc h w O EO w ma zo o: MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 03 3O a°;' on o. Ol o ARTIFICIAL FILL(4 ^ Psphalt Concrete(8•) .............. .............. ................... .............. 32 - 1 Base(24) .............. .............. ................... .............. ALLUVIUM(Oat) ..... so .:. Clayey SAND(SC): medium dense,dark yellowish brrnm,dry .............. .............. ................... .............. n:. 3 -With trace shell fragments and roots d 5' 4 MA m i a 2I 10 ,;, 10 0 (151 rn 115 12 Ir -becces tlaic brorvn a110' - • tg. .............. .............. ................... .............. u m r 5 e B `m 18 +r S.. 13 25 18' .............. .............. ................... .............. Z . .. .............. .............. ................... .............. 4 ..t.. .............. .............. ................... .............. ' to zP 'e P 180 ((a, - SILTY SAND(SM): loose to medium dense,yellowish bro'mn,vid `�=1 6PP 31 1812 ..... ........ a 110 B o ..... ........ 8' x zs - 4 111 12 VM=13 rc 3 . ._s1 5 (]) j8 .............. ........ fi ...... ................... .............. I'.'. . .............. .............. ................... .............. g ..... ........ a as ...... ............ p z 4 ]5. Elastic SILT(MH): soRto medium stiff,varydark brom,wet .. ...61 28 1.0P VM=1.8pp F z ta• ................... ............... .............. a, NOTES: 1.Terms and symbols darned on Plate Al. 3 9 S 3 5 BORING DEPTH:31.5 ft HAMMERTYPE: Automatic Tip BACKFILL Catlings RIG TYPE: CME-75 DEPTH TO WATER: 19.Off DRILLED BY: Martini Dulling FIELDWORK DATE:Odober 14,2013 LOGGED BY: L.Khalkhali,Err DRILLING METHOD:7.25-in.dia.Hollm Stem Auger CHECKED BY: M.Pollard,PE LOG OF BORING NO. B-8 District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Newport Beach, California A-9 Bun FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING RIVIC rS 0` . ONIISI_ !) ; INE�VM0 3_ )�}\ ; \ )U \ ! )) Eat Hm \ _ * ! HIONBw \ { q -J ; ® ` \ # LU R!ace — \ LU � ! 3 pe / { § ƒ ] q4 { b \ ) \ ! ! , \ ! ! : ! : : : , F ! / | § ! ; ! / \ / { / ; / \ / \ / \ / \ / ! _ § § ! ! ! ! ! ] ] ] § \ ) ) ) ) ) ! ! ! ! ! ! ( , \ } \ \ ; \ \ \ ; ; \ \ \ \ } \ \ \ j ,+a Ei PLATE ea Rr and ` �_. ct No. 04.61130008 Isal , U \ ( \ � } _ ± § HIONBUIS \ ) ) j LU ! ® \ � t / § j leal . § 23 \ l ; 02ca 0 »±; b \ ! \® \ � � • � § clz \ ~ � ( � \\\ TFTT T PLATE eB RMC Water and EnvironmentGRO Project No. 04.61130008 US STD SIEVE SIZE US STD SIEVE SIZE HYDROMETER ANALYSIS INCHES NUMBERS 10 20 40 100 200 100 90 80 70 Z 3 60 m w 50 z zz U 40 m W a 30 i... 20 '... 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND SILT or CLAY Coarse I Flro Coarse Medlum I Flre I Pr rkln r:l ACCIFIr.ATI0M C4 CU 0eoar o) (aeplh,rt) C B-1 5.0 Clayey SAND(SC) 0 B-2 10.0 Poorly graded SAND with silt(SPSM) 1.5 4.3 B-3 7.5 Clayey SAND(SC) B-6 5.0 Clayey SAND(SC) O B-7 5.0 Silty SAND(SM) O B-7 20.0 Clayey SAND(SC) A B-7 25.0 Clayey SAND(SC) 11.9 105.5 G B-8 5.0 Clayey SAND(SC) GRAIN SIZE CURVES District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Newport Beach, California PLATE B2 RMC Water and EnvironmentGRO Project No. 04.61130008 100 90 80 /Z_//-/ CH TO68 5 / 30 / ,CL'or OL MH or OH 20 p'10 A / ML'or OL e 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 LIQUID LIMIT(LL) ATTERSERG LIMITS TEST RESULTS LIQUID PLASTIC PLASTICITY LEGEND CLASSIFICATION UMDILII DMITlPL1 wD�O location dWh,ft O B-1 15.0 Sandy CI-AY(CL) 26 10 16 • B4 5.0 Fat CLAY with sand(CH) 61 22 39 B-5 10.0 Fat CLAY with sand(CH) 76 25 51 ♦ B-6 15.0 Clayey SAND(SC) 22 13 9 O B-] 30.0 Fat CLAY with sand(CH) 68 22 46 4 B-8 30.0 Elastic SILT(MH) 61 33 28 PLASTICITY CHART District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Newport Beach, California PLATE B3 RMC Water and EnvironmentalGRO Project No. 04.6113.0008 iiiiiiiiiii�s� 8 8 OPeak: 0-39°, c'=0.3ka1 -Sample o Min.Post-Peak: 0 c''=3fi°, =0.1 kaf Sample B -Sample c O 2 9/..// 0 0 a 1 z 8 a 8 8 00 oa 0a es oo as Normal Stress,ksf Horizontal Displacement, in Boring Number: B-3 �vs a1 oz as oa as Sample Number: 2 i Sample Depth: 5.0ft R USCS Classification: Clayey SAND(SC):olive gray,moist _ - W are j E Specimen A B C D u Water Content,% 13.4% 13.4% 13.4% c < Dry Unit Weight,pd 116.8 113.7 114.7 aoa 0 F Saturation,% 85% 78% 81% ? Void Ratio 0.42 0.45 0.44 .� e Diameter,in 2.42 2.42 2.42 > Height,in 1.00 1.00 1.00 Water Content,% 15.4% 16.3% 14.8% rre Z Dry Unit Weight,pd 117.5 115.5 118.4 Sieve Size %Passing Void Ratio 0.41 0.43 0.40 3/8-in.(9.5mm) --- Displacement at Peak,in 0.04 0.06 0.08 °4(4.75mm) --- Displacement Rate,in/min 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 *16(1.18mm) --- Normal Stress,ksf 0.5 1.0 2.0 ZO 430(0.6mm) --- E Peak Shear Stress,ksf 0.76 0.93 1.95 F '100(0.150mm) --- H Min.Post-Peak Stress,ksf 0.44 0.77 1.54 '200(0.075mm) --- f LL 6 q f g AtterOerg Limits V Liquid Limit,% --- Test Method:ASTM D3080 Plastic Limit,% --- Plasticity Index,% -- f Estimated Gs 2.65 C k, 20oC,cm/sec --- DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS OCSD District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project Location PLATE 134 �GRO �m R-VALUE TEST RESULTS Project: District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Job Number: 04.61130008 Address: Newport Beach, California Date: 10/23/2013 Client: RMC Water and Environment Sample Number: 7150 Sample Depth: 0.0' Sample Description: Dark Yellowish Brown Clayey SAND(SC) Source: Onsite/Native Location Sampled: B-5 Date Sampled: 10/15/2013 Sample By: M.Pollard Test Methods: ASTM D2844, CT301 RESISTANCE VALUE DATA SUMMARY Initial Moisture Content: 12.7 Dry Unit Water Exudation Expansion Weight Content Pressure Pressure R-Value (Pcf) N (psi) (Pso 112.8 15.4 222 0 19 114.5 14.9 279 0 21 115.4 14.1 357 0 28 R-value at Exudation Pressure of 300 psi: 22.5 R-value by Expansion Pressure: TI = 4 N/A Remarks: R-value by stabilometer controls. 35.7% Passing#200 Sieve Distribution: A Fugro Consultants, Inc. Andrew Bajuniemi/Lab&Field Supervisor PLATE B6 C®PER Corrosivity Test Summary CTL# 446-188 Date: 10/25/2013 Tested By: Pi Checked: Pi Client: Fugro Consultants Project: District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Proj.No: 04.61130008 Remarks: Sample Location or ID Resistivity@ 15.5°C Ohm•cm Chloride Su6ate pH ORP Moisture Boring Sample,No. Depth,R As Rec. Minimum Saturated m m Ik % (Redox) At Test Soil Visual Description Dry Wt. Dry Wt. Dry Wt. mV % ASTM G67 Cal 843 ASTM G57 Cal 422-mod. Cal 417-mad.Cal 417-mad, Cal 643 SM 2580B ASTM D2216 B3 10 789 484 67 0.0067 7.9 1 13.9 Brown Clayey SAND Appendix F - Hazardous Materials Database Search 1136054A Page intentionally blank. 1136054.1 Table E-1: EnviroStor Hazardous Materials Database Search Results r PROJECT NAME STATUS PROJECT TYPE ADDRESS 60001550 CLA-VAL Facility Active State Response 1701 Placentia Avenue Costa Mesa Newport 71002205 Hixson Metal Finishing Active Tiered Permit 829 Production Place Beach 865 and 869 West 17th 60001612 Precision Optical Incorporated Facility Active State Response Street Costa Mesa 60001549 Maurer Marine Inc. Active State Response 873 West 17th Street Costa Mesa Voluntary 60000163 The Grand Plan-Eaton/Nexus Active Cleanup 1640 Monrovia Avenue Costa Mesa Southern California Edison Lafayette 60001509 Substation Active State Response 1680 Monrovia Avenue Costa Mesa 71002151 Ametek Aerospace Inc.(Former) Active Tiered Permit 1644 Whittier Avenue Costa Mesa CAD057468 NEWPORT 944 RAYTHEON MICRO ELECTRONICS CLOSED Non-Operating 5005UPERIOR AVE BEACH Inactive-Needs Military Newport 80000331 NEWPORT BCH FCS Evaluation Evaluation Beach Inactive-Needs 71002835 Ceradyne,Inc. Evaluation Tiered Permit 3169 Redhill Avenue Costa Mesa Inactive-Needs 71002874 Prime Technologies,Inc. Evaluation Tiered Permit 3183 Redhill Avenue Costa Mesa Inactive-Needs Newport 71002787 Hoag Memorial Hospital Evaluation Tiered Permit 301 Newport Boulevard Beach Inactive-Needs 30370007 HARTMAN ENTERPRISES Evaluation Evaluation 741 OHMS WAY COSTA MESA Inactive-Needs 71002482 Griswold Industries Cla-Val Co. Evaluation Tiered Permit 1701 Placentia Avenue Costa Mesa Inactive-Needs 71002851 Railmakers, Inc. Evaluation Tiered Permit 864 W. 18th Street Costa Mesa Inactive-Needs 71002310 Eaton Corp. Evaluation Tiered Permit 1 1640 Monrovia Avenue Costa Mesa Area Bounded by Monrovia Avenue, Placentia Avenue, 60001245 Costa Mesa Site Discovery Project No Further Action State Response 16th Street and 18th Street Costa Mesa Refer: 1248 Local 270 EAST 17TH STREET, 30720022 NORGE CLEANERS(HILGREN SQUARE) Agency Evaluation SUITE 12-B COSTA MESA 'DRY CLEAN FOR LESS' FACILITY Refer: 1248 Local 30720021 (FORMER) Agency Evaluation 1704 NEWPORT BLVD. COSTA MESA ORANGE COUNTY REFINING CO.WELL NEWPORT 30130028 N3 Refer: Local Agency Evaluation 21342ND ST. BEACH Corrective NEWPORT 80001429 RAYTHEON MICRO ELECTRONICS Refer: RWQCB Action 500 SUPERIOR AVE BEACH Figure E-1: Envistor-Listed Sites within the Project Area =�111,1 ision Optical l- (,11 :j www.envirostor.d[seta.govrpubliUmapfull.asp?global_ rporated &tindadJ1--Tf..e_.. :r it3.20beach,%20ca&zip=&county=&federal_superfund=true&state_Q ENVIROSTOR q 3 °„M1. ❑ sr 11 m % go'o Mw :6 L, vm: Dry Clean for Less "'It D i w�M.:� w Griswold Industries ® (Former) "). s cr s ■Federal Supem,na Maurer Marine a Cla-Val Co. So. CA Edison ■ n0 State Response p+ re,N _ ■vnwncaw aeanap Lafayette � ❑ �.'' r�' s a ` ,v+,; ❑smool Cleanup Costa Mesa Site o F' TR ,€ ` w i > ■eameern Substation e or e, •,s, ti Sell Ime tre�mn °n ■ ■ " Discovery Prot. ,ansanM, F, ''n �,, AMETEK _ pnye«ne,U +"`EF 4`' 0 ry '� s^`p s 'rs I+ '� ■ revel aliM tioe6 o Newpul BexA o Mex rRn,er� a '°'S Py r.�' c r rpr dPermt Aerospace, Inc. qy� ` ❑ a Hartman °P.-■ Norge Cleaners � Po, ■cement-Acne. r_I I (Former) ■ <m '9 `� % % ' c t' �^ .a ,e, n wsdns Enterprisesclear g `°n sP n n 'Maz�ne,s Or if g p i T a PLmsepar de'rPM' k r O Mpn�ope,anng 9 y Eaton Core °�� u �`w, ^_ nee p °a`es 1. g�`E s v'^ „ s s $ 3 A cepua<ke,wF� Rlee.ep s m" Approx. District 6 ,,,,,a" a - t e Hixon Metal .earr Pl,e. �GeoTracker GnCvy s„i 0 a°�'• Lecm yisM1OPpng cenie,3 s" Sewer Trunk Finishing Raytheon Microp +,. 'w a e.:mel. 5 Electonics(Gil osed) ,' `B �.a ' ° % smuat re t era o - OO Pacwe Gya � "9 ap0• v5.`r e°"`y,a ��+ D R _ c S Ne% Sjter, . `vax ..swO•„w ',•^`` ck n v ma � a *a n, F " Newport BCH FCS ^, a "mro epeva o Hoag Memorial .N�$ r,,.... m .• 4 m`: .yxnlccw.rHoy "°• o Hospital °r'`o wm w� E ys, Orange County °°t` Pear:- w E ,and r'` - Refining Co.Well ed N B E A EW �H'? sdn°d O . �`0 ^ '° +'a" mo o. s can.w. #3 r.,a s rnrrw c vrk e % "a"' hMe MMPNFDDRESS, newpartidntli,ca CAI O Po - I - pl - PNeCoestNwY— - n Table E-2: GeoTracker Hazardous Materials Database Search Results GEOTRACKER • SITE NAME CLEANUP STATUS • r LANDFILL, NEWPORT NEWPORT L10005097371 BEACH OPEN-INACTIVE 19TH & BALBOA BEACH 33.6436 -117.945 -117.945 NEWPORTBANNING OPEN- 1080 W. 17TH COSTA SL0605921271 RANCH LLC REMEDIATION STREET MESA 33.636045 -117.942 -117.942 BETTY JONES COOK TRST- COMPLETED-CASE 936 SUNSET COSTA SLT8111114071 ACEINT' CLOSED DRIVE MESA 33.638328 -117.935 -117.935 829 COMPLETED-CASE PRODUCTION NEWPORT SLT8111364069 HIXON METAL FINISHING CLOSED PLACE BEACH 33.63084329 -117.933 -117.933 NEWPORTARCHES COMPLETED-CASE 12 BALBOA NEWPORT T0605900028 MARINA CLOSED COVES BEACH 33.6211409 -117.936 -117.936 COMPLETED-CASE NEWPORT T0605900081 CHEVRON#7100 CLOSED 3531 NEWPORT BEACH 33.618137 -117.93 -117.93 NEWPORT BEACH CITY COMPLETED-CASE NEWPORT T0605900088 YARD CLOSED 592 SUPERIOR BEACH 33.6250801 -117.935 -117.935 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605900095 DAILY PILOT CLOSED 330 BAY MESA 33.649213 -117.913 -117.913 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605900096 FORMER DAVIS BROWN CLOSED 41117TH MESA 33.630383 -117.912 -117.912 NEWPORT BEACH CITY COMPLETED-CASE NEWPORT T0605900150 HALL CLOSED 3300 NEWPORT BEACH 33.6167772 -117.93 -117.93 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605900153 J.C.CARTER CO., INC. CLOSED 671 W 17TH ST MESA 33.6360026 -117.926 -117.926 MESA CENTER COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605900187 AUTOMOTIVE CLOSED 19616TH MESA 33.632944 -117.921 -117.921 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605900191 MOBIL J118-HJL(FORMER) CLOSED 1701 TUSTIN MESA 33.6308749 -117.912 -117.912 RALPH IRWIN SITE COMPLETED-CASE 488 OLD NEWPORT T0605900252 (FORMERA&GGARAGE) CLOSED NEWPORT BEACH 33.6286556 -117.926 -117.926 OPEN- NEWPORT T0605900284 SHELL OIL REMEDIATION 1000 IRVINE BEACH 33.62839559 -117.908 -117.908 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605900299 SINCLAIR PAINT CLOSED 1901 HARBOR MESA 33.643746 -117.919 -117.919 COMPLETED-CASE 1987 COSTA T0605900325 HARTLEY COMPANY,THE CLOSED PLACENTIAAVE MESA 33.646866 -117.933 -117.933 THEODORE ROBBINS COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605900326 FORD CLOSED 2060 HARBOR MESA 33.6494516 -117.919 -117.919 COMPLETED-CASE NEWPORT T0605900329 TOSCO OIL CLOSED 4625 COAST BEACH 33.622278 -117.938 -117.938 COMPLETED-CASE NEWPORT T0605900343 UNOCAL CLOSED 377 SUPERIOR BEACH 33.6248977 -117.935 -117.935 EXXON/QUAKER STATE COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605900408 MINUTE LUBE CLOSED 30017TH MESA 33.6330998 -117.915 -117.915 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605900428 SHELL OIL L&M VENTURES CLOSED 80119TH MESA 33.6432213 -117.932 -117.932 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605900469 ARCO#5084 CLOSED 49017TH MESA 33.628663 -117.909 -117.909 COMPLETED-CASE 1701 COSTA T0605900478 CLA-VAL CLOSED PLACENTIA MESA 33.637052 -117.933 -117.933 MESA CONSOLIDATED COMPLETED-CASE 1965 COSTA T0605900494 WATER DIST CLOSED PLACENTIA MESA 33.645617 -117.933 -117.933 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605900593 THE TUNE-UP SHOP CLOSED 2020 NEWPORT MESA 33.646527 -117.913 -117.913 COMPLETED-CASE 1763 COSTA T0605900614 SKIPJACK BOATS CLOSED PLACENTIA MESA 33.6385275 -117.932 -117.932 OPEN- HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO- VERIFICATION 500 SUPERIOR NEWPORT T0605900648 SOLID PROD. MONITORING AVE BEACH 33.62865649 -117.929 -117.929 COMPLETED-CASE 1697 COSTA T0605900657 ALANAR CORPORATION CLOSED PLACENTIA MESA 33.636067 -117.932 -117.932 HOWIE'S DIAGNOSTIC COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605900689 CENTER CLOSED 449 BAY MESA 33.648595 -117.918 -117.918 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605900709 NEWPORT AUTOWORKS CLOSED 121 INDUSTRIAL MESA 33.631865 -117.927 -117.927 COMPLETED-CASE 136 ROCHESTER COSTA T0605900723 WEST BAY PROPERTIES CLOSED ST MESA 33.638807 -117.919 -117.919 COMPLETED-CASE 3600W COAST NEWPORT T0605900751 SHELL #3600 CLOSED HWY BEACH 33.621279 -117.93 -117.93 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605900793 RED-E-RENTALS CLOSED 2075 HARBOR MESA 33.649728 -117.92 -117.92 GENERAL OPEN-SITE 2073 HARBOR COSTA T0605900860 TRANSMISSIONS ASSESSMENT BLVD MESA 33.6496333 -117.919 -117.919 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605900932 HARBORTIRE CLOSED 2049 HARBOR MESA 33.6486673 -117.919 -117.919 COSTA MESA FIRE COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605900964 STATION#3 CLOSED 1865 PARK MESA 33.6420938 -117.921 -117.921 FORMER TROWBRIDGE COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605900991 PROPERTY CLOSED 2025 NEWPORT MESA 33.648491 -117.913 -117.913 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605901031 TICE EQUIPMENT RENTAL CLOSED 1930 NEWPORT MESA 33.643922 -117.915 -117.915 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605901038 NEWPORT BOAT SALES CLOSED 1725 SUPERIOR MESA 33.637121 -117.923 -117.923 COMPLETED-CASE 2058 COSTA T0605901049 MARKEL CEMENT CLOSED PLACENTIA MESA 33.6490892 -117.932 -117.932 COMPLETED-CASE 1954 COSTA T0605901094 CRISSMAN'S RENTAL CLOSED PLACENTIA MESA 33.6453253 -117.932 -117.932 COMPLETED-CASE NEWPORT T0605901106 WORLD OIL#42 CLOSED 3401 NEWPORT BEACH 33.6172342 -117.931 -117.931 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605901108 ACE INTERNATIONAL CLOSED 936 SUNSET DR MESA 33.638593 -117.938 -117.938 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605901137 MOBIL#18-532 CLOSED 29517TH MESA 33.633265 -117.916 -117.916 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605901148 LIDO CAR WASH CLOSED 48117TH MESA 33.628733 -117.909 -117.909 VANCE&ASSOCIATES COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605901153 ROOFING INC CLOSED 83717TH MESA 33.635604 -117.934 -117,934 FORMER CHEVRON#9- COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605901256 1597 CLOSED 20417TH MESA 33.6353347 -117.918 -117.918 SMITH AND SONS COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605901270 PROPERTIES CLOSED 735 OHMS MESA 33.633131 -117.929 -117.929 COMPLETED-CASE NEWPORT T0605901340 MOBIL CLOSED 3600 NEWPORT BEACH 33.618978 -117.93 -117.93 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605901375 CHEVRON#9-0819 CLOSED 19517TH MESA 33.635319 -117.919 -117.919 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605901421 FORD'S AUTOMOTIVE CLOSED 705 OHMS MESA 33.633155 -117.928 -117.928 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605901433 TEXACO CLOSED 1695 SUPERIOR MESA 33.6359837 -117.924 -117.924 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605901452 THRIFTY OIL#386 CLOSED 2021 NEWPORT MESA 33.6484884 -117.912 -117.912 COMPLETED-CASE 1672 COSTA T0605901472 THEBOATYARD CLOSED PLACENTIA MESA 33.634974 -117.931 -117.931 OPEN- VERIFICATION COSTA T0605901499 TOSCO-76#4992 MONITORING 1900 NEWPORT MESA 33.64332443 -117.916 -117.916 P AND M STATION#975 AKA SUPERIOR STATION OPEN-SITE 2050 HARBOR COSTA T0605901539 INC. ASSESSMENT BLVD MESA 33.6487383 -117.919 -117.919 OPEN- COSTA T0605901541 G&M OIL H43 REMEDIATION 1740 NEWPORT MESA 33.63869023 -117.92 -117.92 COMPLETED-CASE 1660 COSTA T0605901578 PENNYSAVER CLOSED PLACENTIA MESA 33.6346487 -117.932 -117.932 COSTA MESA DISPOSAL COMPLETED-CASE 2051 COSTA T0605901612 INC CLOSED PLACENTIA MESA 33.6488012 -117.932 -117.932 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605901643 UNOCAL#6176 CLOSED 56019TH MESA 33.643794 -117.922 -117.922 COMPLETED-CASE 1621 COSTA T0605901650 HURLBERT ENTERPRISES CLOSED PLACENTIA MESA 33.6331739 -117.932 -117.932 OPEN-ELIGIBLE COSTA T0605901848 WINALL STATION rill FOR CLOSURE 79019TH MESA 33.6434463 -117.932 -117.932 DUNCAN MCINTOSH COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605901915 PROPERTY CLOSED 87518TH MESA 33.6395394 -117.935 -117.935 COMPLETED-CASE 2025 COSTA T0605901933 SJ COOK&SONS CLOSED PLACENTIA MESA 33.6478802 -117.932 -117.932 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605901939 WEBER FAMILY TRUST CLOSED 1640 SUPERIOR MESA 33.6340567 -117.925 -117.925 OPEN- VERIFICATION COSTA T0605901963 THRIFTY OIL#139 MONITORING 79919TH MESA 33.6432233 -117.932 -117.932 COMPLETED-CASE 1701 COSTA T0605901995 CLA-VAL CORP CLOSED PLACENTIA MESA 33.6361486 -117.932 -117.932 FORMER SERVICE COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605902082 STATION CLOSED 1898 NEWPORT MESA 33.6431642 -117.917 -117.917 INTERSTATE BRANDS COMPLETED-CASE 2024 COSTA T0605902109 CORPORATION CLOSED PLACENTIA MESA 33.6478641 -117.932 -117.932 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605902153 TOSCO-76#4107 CLOSED 39317TH MESA 33.6308729 -117.912 -117.912 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605902170 CLASSIC CAR WASH CLOSED 176 17TH MESA 33.6360467 -117.919 -117.919 CHEVRON ri9-0819 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605902237 (FORMER)/G&M OIL CLOSED 19517TH MESA 33.6354467 -117.919 -117.919 BEACON BAY AUTO WASH COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605902262 #10 CLOSED 2059 HARBOR MESA 33.6491023 -117.919 -117.919 NEWPORT BEACH CORP COMPLETED-CASE NEWPORT T0605902297 YARD CLOSED 592 SUPERIOR BEACH 33.6250801 -117.935 -117.935 PERMALITE PLASTICS COMPLETED-CASE 1537 NEWPORT T0605902343 CORPORATION CLOSED MONROVIAAVE BEACH 33.630217 -117.937 -117.937 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605902349 HARBORTOWING CLOSED 96417TH MESA 33.636549 -117.939 -117.939 COMPLETED-CASE 305 EL CAMINO SAN T0605902377 UNOCAL CLOSED REAL CLEMENTE 33.6470513 -117.919 -117.919 COMPLETED-CASE NEWPORT T0605912480 HUGHES AIRCRAFT CLOSED 500 SUPERIOR BEACH 33.630393 -117.929 -117.929 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH COMPLETED-CASE NEWPORT T0605912872 CORPORATEYARD CLOSED 592 SUPERIOR BEACH 33.63104 -117.927 -117.927 NEWPORT HEALTH CARE OPEN- 500 SUPERIOR NEWPORT T0605930446 FACILITY REMEDIATION AVENUE BEACH 33.62865649 -117.929 -117.929 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605963290 TEXACO OIL CLOSED 1695 SUPERIOR MESA 33.635848 -117.924 -117.924 COMPLETED-CASE COSTA T0605979323 JIM LEE PLUMBING CLOSED 1540 SUPERIOR MESA 33.632481 -117.927 -117.927 RANDY'S AUTOMOTIVE OPEN- 2089 HARBOR COSTA T0605988113 PROPERTY REMEDIATION BLVD. MESA 33.65 -117.919 -117.919 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CORPORATE YARD-TANK COMPLETED-CASE 592 SUPERIOR NEWPORT T10000001116 M2 CLOSED AVENUE BEACH 33.632201 -117.927 -117.927 WALGREENS STORE NO. OPEN- 1726 SUPERIOR COSTA T10000004759 11652 REMEDIATION AVE. MESA 33.637096 -117.922 -117.922 Figure E-2: Geotracker-Listed Sites within the Project Area GEOTRACKER Thrifty Oil#139 _ _ • Cen ■■ ota a. O`ac map Satellite ` 11 ®SIGNIFIES SIfE � Winall Stn.# � ■ ! W191h St ■ a°i m�S �e`c ■Leaking Underground Tank v_ O S T A Tosco-7s#ass2 H (LUST)Cleanup Sites Landfill, Newport Walgreens Slore M E S A `e ❑Other Cleanup Sites Beach ■ No. 11652 Ell-and Disposal Sites ort ■ ■ „ Newp Banning �T � ❑Idilitary Sites Ranch LLC ■ ■m O G&M Oil#43 ie `e ❑WDRSites + ■ ■ W17thU ■ % e cP EIrrigated Lands Regulatory �■ ■ yS ejh'p 1�w~ Program ■W tb 1 ss ■ ll pa, ■Permitted Underground ■ �� FadliBes Plums Cafe �� `�c°' Mary Storage Tank LAST) of and Catering 11111 j c � ng Wells" ■ �, Westclill Plaza o Monitori 'ZOOM TO SEE L11'JS n Plus Newport Kean Coffee � Shopping Center �I Healthcare Facility ; ch Inn c jnL DTSC Cleanup Sites - ■ Hospital Rd n A DTSC Haz Waste Permit Approx. District 6 Shell Oil Sunset Sewer Trunk �. Newport Ridgi�erk Bay Hospital 640x480 • — ■ add N�EI� 0 R T OI n • Unocal#5310 °a `\B A H dci� Castaways U Site List-EXPORTTO EXCEL 66 \� cG°esrHwy I Park ■■ N, The Ongm annery Seafood D's Italian Kitcher of the Pacdic Linda Island 79 Sites r . . ..1.. M s( Newport Plating 4.I=_ea'=_ a Crtan� MapdaM820143oogle 500ret -e,mscf Use Reportamaperror SHOW SITES WITHIN 7000 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: Inewpart beach,ca _ Go Appendix G - Revised Transportation Facilities Table 1136054A Page intentionally blank. 1136054.1 Table G-1: Existing Transportation Facilities Along the Sanitation District Proposed System Improvements Proposed Syste. End #of —Road Traffic Intlararerne.ts Cit, SI'M Date � Cross Streets I Lanes* Type C O]- Rain and Bristol Street Sewer 101 Extension Santa Ana Myrtle Street 2010 Raid St 2 Collector Stop Sign Bristol St 2 Soup Sig. Santa Ana Trunk Sewer 01-17 Rehabilitation Fountain Valley Alton Street 2011 Fairview Rd 3 Signal 7 Santa Ana Bristol St 2 Signal 0249 Taft Branch Improvements Orange County Taft Ave 2014 Glassell St 4 Arterial Signal 46,59 Shaffer St 4 Signal 02-52 Euclid Relief Improvements Sent.Ana Euclid St 2012 Edinger Ave 4 Signal 37,37A Fountain Valley Warner Ave 4 Arterial Signal Slater Ave 6 Signal Talbert Ave 6 Signal Newhope-Placentia/Cypress State College 02-65 Took Replacement Anaheim Blvd 2015 Estella Ave 6 Signal 57,30,42 Fullerton Ball Rd 4 Signal Lincoln Ave 4 Arterial Signal La Palma Ave 5 Signal Orengethorpe Ave 4 Signal Chapman Ave 5 Signal Yorba Linda Blvd Associated Rd 6 Signal 20,26 BastanchuryRd 4 Signal Improvements it, Sri L t r Date I Limai- I Type Control Route Fullerton-Brea Interceptor 02-71 Sewer Relief Pollution Maple Ave 2011 2 Lucnl Stop Spn 03-55 Westside Reliefluterceptor La Palma Denni St 2013 Crescent Ave 2 Cypress Lincoln Ave 2 Los Alamitos Estella Ave Bloomfield 6 Arterial Signal Los Alamitos Blvd 6 Signal 03-55 Magnolia Trunk Rehabilitation Fountain Valley Bushard St 2012 4 Collector Signal Westminster Magnolia St Edinger Ave 6 Signal 33 Garden Grove Balsa Ave 6 Signal Stanton Westminster Ave 6 Signal Garden Grove Anaheim Blvd 4 Arerial Spent Fullerton Chapman Ave 4 Signal Katella Ave 4 Signal Ball Rd 5 Signal Lincoln Ave 5 Signal IS Palma Ave 5 Signal Orangsthorpe Ave 5 Signal Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 03-59 Relief Buena Park Artesia Blvd 2012 Dale St 3 Signal Beach Blvd 4 Arterial Signal Knott Ave Knott Ave 5 Signal LanesT- T;d I Control Battle Beach Trunk—Knob Sewer 03-60 Relief Buena Park Kingrom Ave 2012 Artesia Blvd 2 Local Stop Sign 25,29 Artesia Blvd Knott Ave 5 Arterial Signal Kingman Ave 4 Stop Sign Orangethorpe Knott Ave Ave 5 Arterial Signal Artesia Blvd 6 Signal Balboa Trunk Sewer Newport Beach 0547 Rehabilitation Newport Beach Balboa Blvd 2012 Blvd 6 Arterial Signal Newport Beach Blvd Balboa Blvd 6 Arterial Signal Newport Beach Force Main Pacific Coast Newport Beach 05_ Upgrades Newport Beach Highway 2012 Blvd 6 Arterial Signal Balboa Blvd Newport Beach Pacific Coast Grade Blvd Hwy 6 Arterial Separated 05-61 Bayside Drive Improvement Newport Beach Bayside Dr. 2011 Jamboree Rd 2 Collector Signal El Pasco Dr. 2 Signal Dover Drive Trunk Sewer Pacific Coast 05-63 Relief Newport Beach Dover Dr. 2011 Hwy 4 Arterial Signal WestcliffDr. 4,2 Collector Signal Irvine Ave 2 Signal Improvements y I Costa Mesa WestchffDr Dover Dr 4 Arterial Signal Irvine Ave 4 Signal Pacific Coast 06-17 District 6 Truck Sewer Relief Costa Mesa Pomona Ave 2OW2016 Hwy 2 Collector Signal Newport Beach Newport Beach Blvd 26 71 Newport Beach Blvd Hospital Rd 6 Arterial Simal Superior Ave 16th St 4 Simal Fairview Road Trunk Sewer Newport Beach 06-18 Relief Costa Mesa Fairview Rd 2011 Blvd 4 Arterial Signal Baker St 6 Signal Browning Submank Sewer 07-60 Relief Tustin Browning Ave 2011 Irvine Blvd 4 Collector Signal Unicorpomted Orange County Von Karmen tnmk Sewer 07-62 Relief Irvine Campus Drive 2013 MacArthur Blvd 4 Collector Signal Newport Beach Edinger-Bolsa Chico Tnmk 11-25 Improvements Huntington Beach Bolsa Chico St 2015 Bolsa Ave 6 Arterial Signal Seal Beach McFadden Ave 1 6 *Total number of through lanes(both directions)on the road within that section ^OCTA bus routes: htto://www.octa.net/pdf/Com5leieFeb2Ol4BB Lo Res.odf GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR August 23, 2016 Via Email and U.S. Mail Gary V. Prater Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Ave. f Fountain Valley,CA 2708 Re: Award Protest Statement of W.A.Rasic Construction Company, Inc.; Project No. 6-17,District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief M Dear Mr. Prater: Please consider this to be the Award Protest Statement of W.A. Rasic Construction Company,Inc. ("Rasic") in compliance with the instruction to bidders on the above project. Rasic was the second lowest bidder. Rasic protests the award of the project to Charles King Company,Inc. ("King") for the reasons outlined below. First,Addendum No. 3 in Section BF-4 PERFORMANCE HISTORY AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES (attached for reference)required bidders to demonstrate experience with pipe bursting installation. In this regard,the addendum provided: "The Bidder shall list at least one(1)pipeline project with a public owner completed within the last eight(8)years involving installation of minimum 12-inch diameter pipe via pipe bursting for a length of 1,000 feet or more. Bidder's listed projects shall be similar in nature, scope, complexity and cost to this Project.For each listed project, Bidder shall include the project name and location, Bidder's role, description of work, length, diameter and material of qualifying pipe, final contract value, contract completion date,contact name(s) and phone number(s). The Bidder must submit this information with its Bid."(BF-4 A.3.) In an attempt to satisfy this minimum experience requirement, King identified the Bristol Street Sewer Replacement Phase H project owned by the Costa Mesa Sanitary District. Rasic was a bidder on the Bristol Street Project. Despite King's misrepresentation that the length was longer, 4150 Long Beach Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90807 - 562-928-6111 - fax: 562-928-7339 - www.warasic.com state contractor's license#A368761 the Bristol Street Project was for the construction of only 703LF of pipe. Attached here is a copy of the Bristol Street specification and schedule of work items. Bid item g is the relevant item. Moreover,Addendum No. 3 required the bidders to identify whether or not they self- performed the work"or directly supervised a Subcontractor(s)"who performed the work. King indicated that it directly supervised the work on the Bristol Street Project, suggesting that it was the prime contractor. Attached hereto is a copy of the prime contract on the Bristol Street project which indicates that the prime contractor was Repipe California,Inc.,not King. Whatever role King may have had on the Bristol Street project,it is clear that King does not meet the required experience for pipe bursting. Addendum 3 provides that if a bidder cannot demonstrate the required experience,"its Bid shall be deemed nonresponsive." There is a strong public policy interest in assuring that the Sanitation District does not run afoul of the competitive bidding requirements.' "The provisions of statutes, charters and ordinances requiring competitive bidding in the letting of municipal contracts are for the purpose of inviting competition, to guard against favoritism, improvidence, extravagance, fraud and corruption, and to secure the best work or supplies at the lowest price practicable...:. Kaiima/Rav Wilson v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (2000) 23 Cal.4° 305, 314. Here, the Sanitation District, in requiring each bidder to meet certain experience qualifications, acted to shrink the pool of potential bidders. No doubt other potential bidders who, like King, did not have the required experience rightly decided against submitting a bid for the project. It would run afoul of the competitive bidding requirements to on the one hand shrink the pool of potential bidders and then on the other hand award the contract to a contractor not meeting the minimum requirements set forth in the instructions to bidders. The specification here clearly requires the disqualification of a contractor not meeting the experience qualification. Demand is made that the project be awarded to Rasic, the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of California that I am informed and believe that the foregoing is true and correct. Sincerely, WATER 1-1 C 'California law requires public construction projects to be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. See Public Contract Code§§20161 and 20162. e EO p ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADDENDUM NO. 3 PLEASE PUT IN HANDS OF ESTIMATOR IMMEDIATELY PROJECT NO. 6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF July 7, 2016 In accordance with the Instructions to Bidders, OCSD hereby issues Addendum No. 3, as indicated by the attached sheets. Acknowledge receipt of this Addendum by listing the Addenda Number(s) Received (list by number each addendum) in the IFB Documents, Part 5 - Bid Submittal Forms, BF-3 RECEIPT OF ADDENDA. This Addendum forms a part of the Contract Documents and, with respect to the Contract Documents, this Addendum shall govern. The effort/cost of Work included or excluded by this Addendum shall be reflected in the Bidder's Sealed Bid. A. SUMMARY The purpose of this addendum is to: 1. Modify PART 1 - NOTICE INVITING BIDS to extend the date for the submittal of bids. 2. Modify PART 5—BID SUBMITTAL FORMS, SECTION BF-4 PERFORMANCE HISTORY AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES, Subsection A. LIST OF CURRENT AND COMPLETED PROJECTS AND EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS as issued in Addendum No. 1. B. MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS (Other than Technical Specifications and Plans) 1. PART 1 - NOTICE INVITING BIDS, Bid Opening DELETE: Bids shall be submitted at or before 11:00 A.M. (Pacific Time Zone), Tuesday, July 12, 2016. REPLACE WITH: Bids shall be submitted at or before 11:00 A.M. (Pacific Time Zone), Tuesday, July 26, 2016. C-AD-091115 PROJECT NO.6-17 Addendum No. 3 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF Issued July 7,2016 Page 1 of 2 2. PART 5 - BID SUBMITTAL FORMS, SECTION BF-4 PERFORMANCE HISTORY AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES Subsection A. LIST OF CURRENT AND COMPLETED PROJECTS AND EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS as issued in Addendum No. 1: DELETE: BF-4 PERFORMANCE HISTORY AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES Subsection A. LIST OF CURRENT AND COMPLETED PROJECTS AND EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS, Pages 1 thru 3 of 11 as issued in Addendum No. 1. REPLACE WITH: The attached revised BF-4 PERFORMANCE HISTORY AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES Subsection A. LIST OF CURRENT AND COMPLETED PROJECTS AND EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS, Pages 1 thru 3 of 11. C. MODIFICATIONS TO THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS NONE D. MODIFICATIONS TO THE PLANS NONE All changes shall be made by replacing existing pages with the attached revised pages as listed in the table below. Addendum revisions are identified by a denoted bar(1), at the right border, after each line modified. Pages changed due to relocation of line or paragraphs that are not modified by addendum will not have identifying symbol (1), but are included to keep the Bid Documents intact and continuous. Item Section Title Page(s) ❑1 PART 1 - NOTICE INVITING BIDS No Replacement Pages PART 5- BID SUBMITTAL FORMS, SECTION BF-4 2 PERFORMANCE HISTORY AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES 3 Pages Issued by: Issued by: 14111, Gary V.Prater Jeff Mohr Principal Con raU Administrator Engineering Manager ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT C-AD-091115 PROJECT NO.6-17 Addendum No.3 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF Issued July 7,2016 Page 2 of 2 Bid Submitted By: (Name of Firm) BF-4 PERFORMANCE HISTORY AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES A. LIST OF CURRENT AND COMPLETED PROJECTS AND EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS The Bidder shall demonstrate that it meets or exceeds the minimum listed experience constructing sewer pipelines and sewer manholes by open trench and trenchless methods in densely populated, mixed use, business&residential city streets. Using the table below,the Bidder shall provide its list of projects to demonstrate that it has either self-performed or directly supervised a Subcontractor(s)on the following three(3)criteria below,as minimum construction experience requirements for this Project: 1. The Bidder shall list at least two(2)pipeline projects with a public owner completed within the last ten (10)years involving the construction of polyvinyl chloride(PVC)gravity pipelines of at least 2,000 linear feet for pipe sizes ranging from 10 to 36 inches in diameter. Bidder's listed projects shall be similar in nature,scope,complexity and cost to this Project. For each listed project, Bidder shall include the project name and location, Bidder's role,description of work, length, diameter and material of qualifying pipe,final contract value,contract completion date,contact name(s) and phone number(s).The Bidder must submit this information with its Bid. 2. The Bidder shall list at least two(2)pipeline projects with a public owner completed within the last five(5)years involving installation of minimum 15-inch diameter pipe via cured-in-place pipe(CIPP)trenchless technology for a length of 2,000 feet or more for each project. Bidder's listed projects shall be similar in nature,scope,complexity and cost to this Project. For each listed project, Bidder shall include the project name and location, Bidder's role,description of work, length,diameter and material of qualifying pipe,final contract value, contract completion date,contact name(s)and phone number(s).The Bidder must submit this information with Its Bid. 3. The Bidder shall list at least one(1)pipeline project with a public owner completed within the last eight(8)years involving installation of minimum 12-inch diameter pipe via pipe bursting for a length of 1,000 feet or more. Bidder's listed projects shall be similar in nature, scope, complexity and cost to this Project. For each listed project, Bidder shall include the project name and location, Bidder's role,description of work, length,diameter and material of qualifying pipe,final contract value,contract completion date, contact name(s)and phone number(s).The Bidder must submit this information with its Bid. Use additional sheets as necessary. The Bidder shall ensure that the contact names and numbers are current at the time of Bid submission. If the contact person is no longer employed with the owner,the Bidder shall identify at least one contact person familiar with the project and Bidder's work thereon. In addition to contacting the references included herein,OCSD may,and retains its right to contact other project owners and such other entities for which Bidder has performed or is performing work. If the Bidder cannot demonstrate that It has the minimum experience requirements described above, Its Bid shall be deemed nonresponsive. BF-4 PERFORMANCE HISTORY AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES C-BF-021115 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF ADDENDUM NO.3 Page 1 of 11 Bid Submitted By: (Name of Firm) Project Name and Location/ Check whichOwneYs Name,Address,Phone No. Subcontractor if the Work was directly Bidder's Role Description of Work criteria was Project Manager,or Project Final Contract Completion suparNsad Included In Engineer Value Date this Project ❑ Self Performed $ 2. ❑ ❑Directly Supervised 3. ❑ ❑ Self Performed $ 2. ❑ ❑Directly Supervised 3. ❑ ❑ Self 1. 0 Performed $ 2. ❑ ❑Directly Supervised 3. ❑ ❑ Self Performed $ 2. ❑ ❑Directly Supervised 3. ❑ BF-4 PERFORMANCE HISTORY AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES C-BF-021115 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF ADDENDUM NO.3 Page 2 of 11 Bid Submitted By: (Name of Firm) Project Name and Location/ Check whichOwneYs Name,Address,Phone No. Subcontractor if the Work was directly Bidder's Role Description of Work criteria was Project Manager,or Project Final Contract Completion suparNsad Included In Engineer Value Date this Project ❑ Self Performed $ 2. ❑ ❑Directly Supervised 3. ❑ ❑ Self Performed $ 2. ❑ ❑Directly Supervised 3. ❑ ❑ Self 1. 0 Performed $ 2. ❑ ❑Directly Supervised 3. ❑ ❑ Self Performed $ 2. ❑ ❑Directly Supervised 3. ❑ BF-4 PERFORMANCE HISTORY AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES C-BF-021115 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF ADDENDUM NO.3 Page 3 of 11 COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR BRISTOL STREET SEWER REPLACEMENT PHASE II Project No. 129 Bid Date: October 25,2011 Contract Time: 60 Working Days SANITq�f F� n o00 8 O o H t� Ab 9 cOR"ORArf Robin B. flamers District Engineer Costa Mesa Sanitary District QFESS/pN ROBIN B. HAME SC�C Z RCE NO.31720 T EXP.12131/2012 y s `�9>F vt C S T BER BRISTOL STREET SEWER REPLACEMENT PHASE II Project No. 129 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS(BIDS) BID PROPOSAL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SPECIAL PROVISIONS SOILS INVESTIGATION CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH STANDARDS 1. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS 2. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH STD-105-L-B 3. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH STD-106-L COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT STANDARDS 4. CMSD STD. DWG.NO. S-100 5. CMSD STD. DWG.NO. S-104-A 6. CMSD STD. DWG.NO. S-112 COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT REQUEST FOR CHANGE ORDER FORM COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS(BIDS) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Directors of the Costa Mesa Sanitary District invites and will receive sealed proposals (bids) for furnishing all labor, materials, equipment, transportation, permits, and other items necessary for the construction of the following project: BRISTOL STREET SEWER REPLACEMENT PHASE II Project No. 129 Bids will be received by the Costa Mesa Sanitary District office at 628 West 19t° Street, Costa Mesa, California until the hour of 10:00 a.m. on the 25th day of October, 2011, at which time they will be opened publicly and read aloud in the Board Conference Room. Sealed proposals shall bear the title of the project and the name of the bidder. Any bid received after the scheduled bid opening time shown above will not be accepted and returned to the bidder unopened. It shall be the sole responsibility of the bidder to seal and deliver the bid proposal to the District office at or before the time specified in this notice provided. A set of the approved contract documents including plans and specifications may be obtained at the District office or requested by phone at (949) 645-8400 Extension 221 for a non-refundable payment of $30.00. An additional payment of$15.00 will be required to cover shipping costs. The Contractor shall comply with the provisions of the California Labor Code, the prevailing rate and scale of wages determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations, State of California. Prevailing rates shall be paid to all workers employed in the performance of the contract. Such rates of wages are on file with Department of Industrial Relations and in the office of the District and are available to any interested party upon request. The contractor is responsible for all penalties prescribed for noncompliance to these provisions. Each bid shall be submitted on the Bid Proposal Form furnished as part of the contract documents, and shall be accompanied by a certified check, a cashier's check or a bidder's bond in an amount not less than 10-percent of the amount of the bid, made payable to the Costa Mesa Sanitary District. The check or bond shall be given as guarantee that the bidder will enter into a contract with the District and furnish the required payment and performance bonds and certificates of insurance and endorsements if awarded the work. The check or bond will be declared forfeited if the successful bidder does not enter into the contract or famish the required bonds and insurance forms under the time frame specified in the construction agreement. It is imperative that the bidders carefully review this notice and the District's standard construction agreement and insurance forms. The successful bidder will be required to comply with all requirements in the standard construction agreement and insurance forms. In the event of failure or inability to meet these requirements after the award of contract, the District shall have the right to reject the bid and/or declare a forfeiture of the bid bond. Pursuant to California Contract Code Section 22300, CONTRACTOR will be entitled to post approved securities with the District or an approved financial institution in order to have the District release funds retained by the District to insure performance of the contract. CMSD Project No. 129 Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals(Bids)-1 of 2 Liquidated damages in the sum of $250 per day shall be imposed for each unexcused day beyond the contract completion date. The Board of Directors of the District reserves the right to select the schedule(s)under which the bids are to be compared and contract(s)awarded,to reject any and all bids,and to waive any and all irregularity in any bid. Dated: September 12,2011 BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT CMSD Project No. 129 Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals(Bids)—2 of 2 COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA BID PROPOSAL FORM BRISTOL STREET SEWER REPLACEMENT PHASE II Project No. 129 Name of Bidder: Address: Phone No.: TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT: Pursuant to and in compliance with the Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals (Bids) and the other documents relating thereto, the undersigned bidder has carefully examined and is completely familiar with the plans, specifications, and contract documents including the local conditions affecting the performance of the contract, the character, quality, quantities, and scope of the work, and the materials to be famished as to the requirements of the specifications and the contract. If awarded the contract, the undersigned bidder hereby proposes and agrees to perform within the time stipulated in the contract, including all of its component parts and everything required to be performed, and to famish any and all of the labor, material, tools, equipment, transportation, services, permits, utilities, and all other items necessary to perform the contract and complete in a workmanlike manner, all of the work required in connection with the construction of said work all in strict conformity with the plans and specifications and other contract documents, including addenda Nos.:_,_,_,_, and- on file in the District office for the prices hereinafter set forth. The undersigned as bidder, declares that the only persons or parties interested in this proposal as principals are those named herein; that this proposal is made without collusion with any person, firm, or corporation; and he proposes and agrees, if the proposal is accepted, that he will execute a contract with the District in the form set forth in the contract documents and that he will accept in full payment thereof the following prices,to wit: CMSD Project No. 129 Bid Proposal Form— 1 of 10 2S Y RAt89�� ADDENDUM NO.1 Contract Documents and Construction Plans BRISTOL STREET SEWER REPLACEMENT-PHASE H CIP PROJECT NO. 129 Today's Date: September 07,2011 Bid Opening Date: October 25,2011 This Addendum is hereby made a part of the contract documents and construction drawings. Receipt of the Addendum shall be noted on the Bid Form. The following changes, additions, clarifications or modifications shall be made to the contract documents and construction drawings; all other conditions remain the same. Contractor's Bid Price shall include night work if required by the City of Newport Beach or Costa Mesa Sanitary District. If there are any questions,please call(949)631-1731 office or(949)468-9840 cell. Thank you. COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT 4� Robin B. Harriers,PE District Engineer CMSD Project No. 129 Bid Proposal Form—2 of 10 CMSD SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT NO. 129 SCHEDULE OF WORK ITEMS(SCHEDULE A) BRISTOL STREET SEWER REPLACEMENT PHASE 11 BID tAPPROX.,DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL ITEM PRICE AMOUNT 1 Bonds, Insurance, and Permits: Work under this item includes any costs incurred for securing bonds, insurance Lump permits and financing for construction work. Sum $ 2 Lump Sum Mobilization, Demobilization and Cleanup: Work under this item shall include preparatory and cleanup operations including, but not limited to, those necessary for the movement of personnel, equipment, materials, and incidentals to and from the project site, securing a temporary construction yard, and maintaining the project Lump site in a safe and orderly manner during construction. Sum $ 3 Lump Sum Traffic Control: Famish all labor, materials, and equipment for the installation and removal of the required traffic control including, but not limited to, changeable message boards, signs, delineators, traffic cones, barricades, flashing arrow signs, steel plates, and all other traffic control devices necessary to comply with the traffic Lump control drawings. Sum $ 4 Lump Sum Oeotechnical Evaluation During Construction: Work under this item shall include laboratory testing of trench backfill, aggregate base, asphalt, and concrete during construction. Work under this item shall also include the monitoring of batch time, temperature, mix designs, and placement time for all pavement replacement. Note: Contractor shall provide a report(2 copies)of the geotechnical observation and testing upon project Lump ,completion to the District. Sum $ 5 Lump Sum Provide Diversion Plan for Existing Sewage Flow During Construction: Work under this item shall include, but is not limited to, pumps, temporary hoses or piping, pumper trucks,plugs, and all other equipment necessary to provide diversion of existing sewage flow during construction Lump complete in place. Sum $ 6 Lump Sum Replace Pavement Striping: Work under this item shall include furnishing and installing all labor, material, and work necessary to replace existing pavement striping damaged during construction to original condition Lump complete in place. Sum $ CMSD Project No. 129 Bid Proposal Form—3 of 10 CMSD SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT NO. 129 SCHEDULE OF WORK ITEMS (SCHEDULE A) BRISTOL STREET SEWER REPLACEMENT PHASEH BID APPROX. DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL ITEM QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT 7 3 Each Remove existing manhole and Construct Launching/Receiving Pit for pipe bursting system. Work under this item shall include famishing and $ installing all labor,material, shoring and work necessary for this item. Each $ 8 703 LF Construct 12" HDPE SDR17, IPS pipe by pipe bursting method to replace existing 8" VCP sewer per Plans and Specifications. Contractor Bidding the Project must Self Perform the Pipe Bursting Operations, have successfully completed at least 1,500 linear feet o Sewer Pipe Bursting, or shall submit with Bid Documents that they will use the Pipe Bursting Equipment Manufacturer's Technical Representative to train and support for project start up. Work under this item shall include furnishing and installing all labor, material, and work necessary to$ construct 12" HDPE pipe by pipe bursting method including pre and post CCTV and pipe cleaning. LF $ 9 3 Each Construct 48" Manhole per CMSD Std. Dwg. No. S-I00 with Ameron T-Lock Liner System or approved equal on manhole walls,bases and channels. Work under this item shall include furnishing and$ installing all labor, material, and work necessary to construct new manhole in place. Each $ 10 1 Each Protect existing manhole in place and construct access pit for pipe bursting if needed. Work under this item shall include furnishing and installing all labor, material, and work necessary to S protect existing manhole in place and construct access Pit. Each $ 11 4 Each Reconnect sewer lateral per CMSD Std.Dwg.No. S-104- A with fusion HDPE saddle. Work under this item shall include furnishing and $ installing all labor,material, and work necessary to reconnect sewer lateral. Each $ CMSD Project No. 129 Bid Proposal Form-4 of 10 CMSD SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT NO. 129 SCHEDULE OF WORK ITEMS (SCHEDULE A) BRISTOL STREET SEWER REPLACEMENT PHASE H BID APPROX. DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL ITEM QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT 12 Lump Sum Protect existing IRWD domestic water pipelines in place. Work under this item shall include furnishing and installing all labor, material, and work necessary to protect Lump the water line in place. Sum $ 13 Lump Sum Chip mound existing opening in manhole. Connect new 12"HOPE pipe and mortar patch grout. Work under this item shall include famishing and installing all labor,material, and work necessary to Lump complete this item. Sum $ 14 Lump Sum Pothole existing 24"RCP Storm Drain prior to construction and protect storm drain during pipe bursting. Contractor to provide televising inspection of storm drain before and after construction. Work under this item shall include famishing and installing all labor,material, and work necessary to Lump complete this item. Sum $ 15 Lump Sum Protect existing 16" domestic water pipeline in place per City on Newport Beach requirements. Work under this item shall include furnishing and installing all labor, material, and work necessary to protect Lump the water line in place. Sum $ 16 Lump Sum Remove Temporary Cap set during soils investigation. Construct Pavement Replacement per City of Newport Beach Std-105-L-B and detail on Sheet 5 of Plans. Work under this item shall include all material and labor for pavement replacement including final asphalt concrete Lump pavement installation. Sum $ 17 Lump Sum Pavement Replacement per City of Newport Beach Std- 105-L-B and detail on Sheet 5 of Plans. Work under this item shall include all material and labor for pavement replacement including final asphalt concrete Lump pavement installation. Sum $ TOTAL AMOUNT OF ITEMS 1 THROUGH 17 $ CMSD Project No. 129 Bid Proposal Form—5 of 10 CMSD SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT NO. 129 SCHEDULE OF WORK ITEMS (SCHEDULE A) BRISTOL STREET SEWER REPLACEMENT PHASE II BID I APPROX. DESCRIPTION UNIT I TOTAL ITEM QUANTITY1 I PRICE I AMOUNT (TOTAL IN WORDS—SCHEDULE A) Bidders Initials Note: In case of a discrepancy between the words and figures, the words shall prevail. The Contractor agrees that the District will not be held responsible if any of the approximate quantities shown in the foregoing proposal shall be found incorrect, and he shall not make any claim for damages or for loss of profits because of a difference between the quantities of the various classes of work as estimated and the work actually done. If any error, omission or mis-statements shall be discovered in the estimated quantities, it shall not invalidate this contract or release the Contractor from the execution and completion of the whole or part of the work herein specified, in accordance with the specifications and the plans herein mentioned and the prices herein agreed upon and fixed therefor, or excuse him from any of the obligations or liabilities hereunder, or entitle him to any damages or compensation otherwise than as provided for in this contract. The Contractor agrees that the District shall have the right to increase or decrease the quantity of any bid item or portion of the work or to omit portions of the work as may be deemed necessary or expedient, and that the payment for incidental items of work, not separately provided in the proposal shall be considered included in the price bid for other various items of work. Accompanying this proposal is NOTICE: Insert the words "Cash", "Certified Check", or "Bidder's Bond", as the case may be in an amount equal to at least 10%of the total bid price,payable to the Costa Mesa Sanitary District. The undersigned deposits the above named security as a proposal guaranty and agrees that it shall be forfeited to the Costa Mesa Sanitary District as liquidated damages in case this proposal is accepted by the District and the undersigned shall fail to execute a contract for doing said work and to famish good and sufficient bonds in the forth set forth in the specifications and contract documents of the District with surety satisfactory to the District within 10 Days after the bidder has received written notice of the award of the contract; otherwise, said security shall be returned to the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, Contractor's Business Name Contractor Title Business Address: Street By: Title City State Zip Contractor's License,Expiration CMSD Project No. 129 Bid Proposal Form—6 of 10 Date&Classification Business Phone Number Name Title Residence Phone Number Bidder's Residence: Street City State Zip I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the forgoing is true and correct. Dated at ,this day of 20_ (Signed) The full names and residences of all persons and parties interested in the foregoing proposal, as principals,are as follows: NOTICE: Give first and last names in full; in case of corporation, give names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, and affix corporate seal; in all cases of partnerships and joint ventures give names of all the individual members. CMSD Project No. 129 Bid Proposal Form—7 of 10 A CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this LSL day of Alft 04i , by and between the COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as 'DISTRICT' and, Re- Pipe-CA, Inc. a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as 'CONTRACTOR. WITNESSETH That for and in consideration of the promises and agreements hereinafter made and exchanged, DISTRICT and CONTRACTOR mutually agree as follows: 1 Scope of the Work. That CONTRACTOR shall perform all the work and shall provide and furnish all the labor materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required to construct: BRISTOL STREET SEWER REPLACEMENT PHASE II 2. Labor and Materials. All of said work to be performed and materials tobefumished shall be in strict accordance with the plans and specifications entitled Specifications for BRISTOL STREET SEWER REPLACEMENT PHASE II,and CONTRACTOR agrees to do everything required by this Contract and the Contract Documents including the plans and specifications and any general conditions. All labor materials,tools,equipment and services shall be furnished on work performed,and under the direction, administration and subject to the approval of DISTRICT or its authorized representatives. CONTRACTOR warrants that it will not purchase mined construction material for this PROJECT except from a mining operation that is currently identified in the list published pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 2717 of the Public Resources Code. Refer to the current 3098 list for qualified mining operations atwww.consrv.ca.gov/OMR/ab_3098_listtcurrent_list. 3. Time of Completion. CONTRACTOR agrees to commence the work to be performed under this Contract within five (5) days of receipt of the 'Notice to Proceed' and to diligently prosecute the work to completion before the expiration of SIXTY 160)WORKING DAYS from the date of commencement. 'Working days' means all calendar days except Saturdays, Sundays,and legal holidays. 4. Time of the Essence. Time Is of the essence of this Contract. 5. Liquidated Damages/Delay Damages. It is agreed by the parties hereto that in case the total work called for hereunder in all parts and requirements is not finished or completed within the number of working days asset forth herein,damage will be sustained by the DISTRICT and that it is and will be impractical and extremely difficult to ascertain and determine the actual damage which the DISTRICT will sustain in the event of and by reason of such delay, and it is therefore agreed the CONTRACTOR will pay to the DISTRICT the sum of TWO HUNDRED FIFTY and 001100 Dollars($250.001 per calendar day for each and every day of delay in finishing the work in excess of the numberof days prescribed in paragraph 3 and the CONTRACTOR agreesto pay said liquidated damages herein provided for and further agrees that the DISTRICT may deduct the amount thereof from any monies due or that may become due the CONTRACTOR hereunder The CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed with liquidated damages for any portion of the delay in completion of the work beyond the time named herein for the completion of the work due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR, including but not restricted to acts of God or of the public enemy fire, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strike, and unsuitable weather or delays of subcontractors due to such causes, provided CONTRACTOR submits timely notification and a written Request for Change Order as required herein. The CONTRACTOR shall within ten(10)days from the beginning of any such delay(unless the DISTRICT shall grant a further period of time prior to the date of final settlement of the Contract) notify the District Engineer in writing of the cause of the delay and the District Engineer shall extend the time for completing the work if in the District Engineer's judgment the cause so merits. The District Engineers determination on this matter shall be final and conclusive on the parties hereto. CONTRACTOR shall also be required to submit a written Request for Change Order to District Engineerwithin fifteen(16)days of the dale of such delay No adjustment shall be allowed for such delay unless strict compliance with this contractual provision is effected. CONTRACTOR's remedy shall be limited to the extra days granted and to any damages that he maybe entitled to using the formula agreed to by the parties for all damages as provided in Paragraph 28 6. The ContractSum. DISTRICT agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment for the work above agreed to be done the sum of,Two hundred ninety nine thousand seven hundred Dollars( 299 700). 7 Progress Payments. Prior to the fifteenth day of the month next following the commencement of the work,there shall be paid to CONTRACTOR a sum equal to 90 percent of the value of the work completed since the commencement of the work as determined by the District Engineer and thereafter prior to the fifteenth day of each successive month as the work progresses. CONTRACTOR shall be paid such sum as will bring the payments up each month to 90 percent of the value of the work completed since the commencement of the work as determined by the District Engineer less all previous payments,provided that CONTRACTOR submits his request for payment prior to the last Wednesday of each preceding month. DISTRICT shall make the final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered,35 days after the acceptance of the work and the filing of a Notice of Completion. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law accompanied by a certificate signed by the District Engineer stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. a. Prompt Payments. DISTRICT agrees to promptly make progress payments on undisputed and properly submitted payment requests within thirty(30)days and to comply with the provisions of Public Contract Code Section 20104.50. 9. Retention Securities. Pursuant to California Contract Code Section 22300 CONTRACTOR will be entitled to post approved securities with the DISTRICT or an approved financial institution in order to have the DISTRICT release funds retained by the DISTRICT to insure performance of the Contract. 10. Specifications. The Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, also known as the Greenbook,latest edition,shall be controlling unless a different specification is called out in the Contact Documents, including the Costa Mesa Sanitary District's Standard Plans and Specifications for the Construction of Sanitary Sewers and the BRISTOL STREET SEWER REPLACEMENT PHASE II. 11 Change Orders.Change order requests shall be submitted to the District Engineer in writing who shall have discretion to determine the merit of the change order request. The District Engineer may approve or disapprove change orders in his discretion except that any change order resulting in an increase of the Contract price shall be co-signed by the District Manager and/or approved by the Board of Directors. No amendments,modifications,orwaiversofContracttermsor the Contract Documents,including additional compensation for extra work,will be allowed absent a written Change Order signed by both parties. 12. Prevailing Wage Rates. DISTRICT has ascertained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general prevailing rate for legal holidays and overtime work in the locality in which the work is to be performed for each craft or type of work needed to execute this Contract, and the same has been placed on file with the District Clerk at the District's principal office.Said per diem wages can be obtained on the Internet at http:/Mnvw dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination him. Said per diem wages are deemed to include employer payments for health and welfare, pension,vacation,and travel time and subsistence pay all in accordance with sections 1773.1 and 1773.8 of the Labor Code of the State of California. 13. Discrimination, Minorities, Aliens. The CONTRACTOR shall not unlawfully discriminate nor allow its employees,agents, principals,or subcontractors to unlawfully discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of race, religious creed, national origin or sex. 14. Compliance with Davis-Bacon Act. This provision does not apply to this Contract. 16. Payroll Records. The provisions of section 1776 of the Labor Code of the State of California regarding the preparation, maintenance and filing of payroll records are applicable to this Contract. Specifically each CONTRACTOR and subcontractor shall keep an accurate payroll record, showing the name, address, social security number work classification, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice or worker employed by him in connection with the public work. THE CONTRACTOR'S AND SUBCONTRACTOR'S PAYROLL RECORDS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DISTRICT ENGINEER FOR REVIEW ON A WEEKLY BASIS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTAL OF SUB-CONTRACTOR'S PAYROLL RECORDS 16. Penalty CONTRACTOR shall,as a penalty to the DISTRICT forfeit up to$50.00 for each calendar day or portion thereof for each workman paid (either by him or any subcontractor under him) less than the prevailing rate set forth herein on thework provided for in this Contract,all in accordance with section 1775 of the Labor Code of the State of California. 17 Apprentices. If applicable, the provisions of Labor Code Section 1777.5 requiring the use of apprentices in certain ratios to journeymen are hereby imposed upon CONTRACTOR. 18. Legal Day's Work. In the performance of this Contract, not more than eight (8) hours shall constitute a day's work, and the CONTRACTOR shall not require more than eight(8) hours of labor in a dayfrom any person unless the CONTRACTOR complies will all applicable Labor laws. CONTRACTOR shall conform to Article 3, Chapter 1 Part 7 (section 1810, at seq.) of the Labor Code of the State of California, and it is agreed that the CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the DISTRICT as a penalty the sum of$25.00 for each workman employed in the execution of this Contract by the CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor for each calendar day during which any workman is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty(40) hours in any one week in violation of said article. 19. Subcontracting. CONTRACTOR acknowledges that he is aware of the provisions of the 'Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act' (Public Contract Code Section 4100 at seq.)and that he agrees to comply with all applicable provisions thereof If any part of the work to be done under this Contract is subcontracted,the subcontract shall be in writing and shall provide that all work to be performed thereunder shall be performed in accordance with this Contract. Upon request, certified copies of any or all subcontracts shall be furnished to the District Engineer or DISTRICT The subcontracting of any or all of the work to be done will in no way relieve the CONTRACTOR of any part of his responsibility under the Contract. Breach of any of the above provisions will be considered a violation of the Contract, and the DISTRICT may, cancel the Contract, assess the CONTRACTOR a penalty of not more than 10 percent of the subcontract involved, or cancel the Contract and assess the penalty All persons engaged in the work,including subcontractors,will be considered employees of the CONTRACTOR. He will be held responsible for their work. The DISTRICT will deal directly with and make all payments to the CONTRACTOR. 20. Workers' Compensation. CONTRACTOR shall carry Workers Compensation Insurance and require all subcontractors to carry Workers'Compensation Insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California. CONTRACTOR, by executing this Contract, hereby certifies: 'I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. 21 Drug-Free Work. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide a drug-free workplace in accordance with 24 CFR part 24 sub-part F Under 24 CFR part 24 sub-part F the CONTRACTOR will provide certification in writing that it will provide a drug-free workplace by (a). Publicizing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the workplace and specifying the action it will take against employees for violation of such prohibition; (b) Establish an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about- ( Degrees of drug abuse in the workplace; 2. The policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; 3.Any available drug counseling rehabilitation and employee assistance programs; 4 The penalties which may be imposed on employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace. (c). Making it a requirement that every employee to be engaged in the performance of the Contract be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a); (d) Notifying employees in the statement required by paragraph (a)that as a condition of employment under the Contract the employee will 1 Abide by the term of the statement; and 2. Notify the employer in writing of any conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) calendar days after such conviction. (a). Notifythe DISTRICT in writing,within ten(10)calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d) (2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employer of said convicted employee must provide notice, including conviction title, to the DISTRICT (f). Taking one of the following actions, within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d) (2),with respect to any employee who is so convicted 1 Taking appropriate action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or 2.Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency (g). Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs(a), (b) (c), (d), (a) and (f) 22. Bonds. CONTRACTOR shall, prior to the execution of the Contract,furnish bonds approved by DISTRICT one in the amountof one hundred percent(100%)of the Contract price,to guarantee the faithful performance of the work, and the other in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the Contract price to guarantee payment of all claims for labor and materials furnished. This Contract shall not become effective until such bonds are supplied to and approved by DISTRICT All bonds shall be issued by an admitted surety insurer and the DISTRICT reserves the right to object to any such surety in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure Section 995.660. 23. CONTRACTOR'S Affidavit. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the District Engineer his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the project for either labor or material,except certain items,if any to be setforth in an affidavit covering disputed claims,or items in connection with a Notice to Withhold,which have been filed underthe provisions ofthestatutes of the State of California. 24. CONTRACTOR'S Waiver CONTRACTOR agrees to execute a Final Close Out Agreement and Release of All Claims. The execution by CONTRACTOR of the Final Close Out Agreement and Release of All Claims shall constitute a waiver of all claims against DISTRICT under or arising out of this Contract unless otherwise stated in said document. 25. Notice to Proceed. No work,services, material or equipment shall be performed or furnished under this Contract unless and until a 'Notice to Proceed' has been given to the CONTRACTOR by the District Engineer and all bonds and certificates of insurance required pursuant hereto have been furnished to and approved by DISTRICT 26. Termination. A. If CONTRACTOR should fait to comply with any of the provisions hereof,or in the event CONTRACTOR should become the subject of a proceeding under state or federal law for relief of debtors, or if CONTRACTOR makes an assignment forthe benefit of creditors, DISTRICT shall have the right to hold CONTRACTOR in default and cancel this Contract in whole or in part. B. Should CONTRACTOR, at any time during the progress of the work, refuse or neglect to supply sufficient material or labor or fail to comply with any provision of this Contract, DISTRICT shall have the right,without prejudice to any other right or remedy it may have,to provide such materials and labor or make good such deficiencies as DISTRICT may deem expedient after three(3)days notice in writing,delivered or mailed to CONTRACTOR at his last address on file with DISTRICT and CONTRACTOR shall be liable for the cost and expense thereof which may be deducted by DISTRICT from any money that may be due CONTRACTOR. C Without limiting any rights which DISTRICT may have by reason of any default by CONTRACTOR hereunder DISTRICT reserves the right to terminate this Contract in whole or in part at its convenience. In such event DISTRICT shall compensate CONTRACTOR, subject to deduction for previous payments(1)by reimbursing CONTRACTOR for all actual expenditures and costs incurred in performing under this Contract (ii) by reimbursing CONTRACTOR for all expenditures made and costs incurred with DISTRICT'S prior written approval in settling or discharging outstanding commitments entered into by CONTRACTOR in performing under this Contract and (iii)by paying CONTRACTOR as a profit, insofar as a profit is realized hereunder an amount equal to the profit on the entire Contract estimated at the time of termination, multiplied by the percentage of completion of the work. In no event, however will the compensation to CONTRACTOR exceed the total Contract price less payments previously made and less the Contract price of work not terminated. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, CONTRACTOR shall, unless the notice otherwise directs, (i)immediately discontinue the work and the placing of all orders and subcontracts in connection with this Contract, (11) immediately cancel all existing orders and subcontracts made hereunder and(iii)immediately transferto DISTRICT all materials,supplies, work-in-process,appliances,facilities,equipment,machinery and tools acquired by CONTRACTOR in connection with the performance of this Contract. 27 CONTRACTOR'S Independent Investigation. No plea of ignorance of conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist, or of conditions or difficulties that may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Contract,as a result of failure to make the necessary independent examinations and investigations,and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by District Engineer and/or DISTRICT for purposes of letting this Contract out to bid, will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the CONTRACTOR to fulfill in every detail all requirements of the Contract Documents. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time. 28. _Damages/Extra Work Compensation. The parties have agreed to modify the formula for damages set forth in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, The parties agree that the damage formula shall be used to measure all of CONTRACTOR's damages or extra work required by this job. CONTRACTOR shall be limited to the following: Direct costs Mark-up Labor 20% Materials 15% Equipment Rental 15% Other Items 15% Subcontracted work 10% (first$5000) Subcontracted work 5% (work in excess of first$5000) Specialty Subcontracting (required by extra work) 5% (Provided at least three competitive bids are obtained and contractor selected the lowest bidder) Excluded from recovery shall be so-called 'Eichleay damages including, but not limited to, home office overhead, insurance and bonding costs, lost bonding capacity lost profits, and lost interest. CONTRACTOR acknowledges that his recovery for damages or extra work is limited as provided in this paragraph. CONTRA! CTOR's Initial 29. Other Documents Included. It is further agreed by the parties hereto that the following documents are incorporated into this Contract by reference and are to be read and construed together as the full, complete and integrated terms of this Contract: A. Notice Inviting Bids B. Supplementary Bid Addenda or Bulletins, if applicable C Proposal Packet D Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction 'Greenbook, latest edition E. Costa Mesa Sanitary Distdct Standard Plans and Specifications for the Construction of Sanitary Sewers F Construction Plans and Specifications for Bristol Street Sewer Replacement- Phasell G Standard Drawings(Costa Mesa Sanitary District Drawings and CityofCosta Mesa Drawings) H. Soils Report I. City of Costa Mesa Encroachment Permit J Faithful Performance Bond K. Payment Bond L. Approved Change Orders, if applicable M. Contractor's Affidavit N. Final Closeout Agreement and Release of All Claims The documents listed in this Paragraph, including this Contract,shall be known and referred to collectively as the 'Contract Documents. 30. Interpretation. In the event of any conflict, inconsistency or incongruity between the provisions of this Contract and the provisions of any of the Contract Document(s) referenced in Paragraph 29 hereof or amendments thereto, the provisions of this Contract shall control in all respects. 31 Attornev's Fees. if any action at law or inequity is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this agreement,the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees,costs and necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to which he may be entitled. If any action is brought against the CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor to enforce a Stop Notice or Notice to Withhold,which names the DISTRICT as a panyto said action, DISTRICT shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, costs and necessary disbursements. 32. Additional Costs. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible to reimburse DISTRICT a sum equal to the expenses of administration and legal services required to be expended by DISTRICT in processing Notices to Withhold, Stop Notices,or similar legal documents arising out of a failure of the CONTRACTOR to pay for labor or materials. Said obligation shall be provided for in the payment bond required by the CONTRACTOR. The DISTRICT shall further have the right to offset any such costs and expenses incurred by DISTRICT against any sums owing to CONTRACTOR. 33. Insurance. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide insurance in accordance with the requirements set forth herein. if CONTRACTOR uses existing coverage to comply with these requirements and that coverage does not meet the requirements set forth herein, CONTRACTOR agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so. The following coverages will be provided by CONTRACTOR and maintained on behalf of the DISTRICT and in accordance with the requirements set forth herein. Commercial General Liability/Umbrella Insurance. Primary insurance shall be provided onlSO- CGL form No CG 00 01 1185 or 88 or equivalent, as determined by District Counsel. Total limits shall be no less than one (1) million dollars per occurrence for all coverages and three (3) million dollars general aggregate. DISTRICT and its employees and agents shall be added as additional insured using ISO additional insured endorsement form CG 2010 with an edition date prior to 1992 orequivalent,as determined by District Counsel.Coverage shall applyon a primary non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance,primary or excess,available to DISTRICT or any employee or agent of DISTRICT Coverage shall not be limited to the vicarious liability or supervisory role of any additional insured. Umbrella Liability Insurance(over primary)shall apply to bodily injury/property damage, personal injury/advertising injury at a minimum, and shall include a drop down provision providing primary coverage above a maximum $25,000.00 self-insured retention for liability not covered by primary policies but covered by the umbrella policy Coverage shall be on the following form to any underlying coverage. Coverage shall be provided on a 'pay on behalf"basis,with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits. There shall be no cross liability exclusion. Policies shall have concurrent starling and ending dates.District Counsel shall have the authority to make determinations on the acceptability of forms of insurance coverage. A determination that the form of coverage is not acceptable shall cause the award to go to the next lowest responsible bidder Business Auto/Umbrella Liability Insurance. Primary coverage shall be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 including symbol 1 (Any Auto)or equivalent,as determined by District Counsel. Limits shall be no less than one (1) million dollars per accident. Starting and ending dates shall be concurrent. If CONTRACTOR owns no autos, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. Workers'CompensationlEmployers' Liability shall be written on a policy form providing workers' compensation statutory benefits as required by law Employers liability limits shall be no less than one (1) million dollars per accident or disease. Employers' liability coverage shall be scheduled under any umbrella policy described above. Unless otherwise agreed,this policy shall be endorsed to waive any right of subrogation as respects the DISTRICT its employees or agents. CONTRACTOR and DISTRICT further agree as follows: 1 This Section supersedes all other sections and provisions of this Contract to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Section. 2. Nothing contained in this Section is to be construed as affecting or altering the legal status of the parties to this Contract. The insurance requirements set forth in this Section are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this Contract and shall be interpreted as such. 3. All insurance coverage and limits provided pursuant to this Contract shall apply to the full extent of the policies involved,available orapplicable. Nothing contained in this Contract or any other agreement relating to the DISTRICT or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage. 4 Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only and is not intended by any party to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. 5. For purposes of insurance coverage only this Contract will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards, performance of this Contract. 6. All general or auto liability insurance coverage provided pursuant to this Contract, or any other agreements pertaining to the performance of this Contract, shall not prohibit CONTRACTOR, and CONTRACTOR'S employees, or agents, from waiving the right of subrogation p6orto a loss. CONTRACTOR hereby waives all rights of subrogation against DISTRICT l Unless otherwise approved by DISTRICT CONTRACTOR'S insurance shall be written by insurers authorized to do business in the State of California and with a minimum 'Best's' Insurance Guide rating of A:VII' Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these insurance specifications. 8. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Contract does not complywith these requirements or is canceled and not replaced, DISTRICT has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and CONTRACTOR will promptly reimburse any premium paid by DISTRICT 9 CONTRACTOR agrees to provide notarized evidence of the insurance required herein, satisfactory to DISTRICT consisting of certificate(s) of insurance evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to CONTRACTOR'S general liability and umbrella liability policies(if any)using ISO form CG 20 10 with an edition priorto 1992 or equivalent, as determined by the District Counsel. Certificate(s) are to reflect that the insurer will provide 30 days notce of any cancellation of coverage. CONTRACTOR agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates of any cancellation of coverage. CONTRACTOR agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation, and to delete the word 'endeavor with regard to any notice provisions. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide complete copies of policies to DISTRICT upon request. 10. CONTRACTOR shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Contract have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Such proof will be furnished within 72 hours of the expiration of the coverages. 11 Any actual or alleged failure on the part of DISTRICT or any other additional insured under these requirements to obtain proof of insurance required under this Contract in no way waives any right or remedy of DISTRICT or any additional insured, in this or any other regard. 12. CONTRACTOR agrees to require all subcontractors or other parties hired forthis project to provide general liability insurance naming as additional insured all parties to this Contract. CONTRACTOR agrees to obtain certificates evidencing such coverage and make reasonable efforts to ensure that such coverage is provided as required here. CONTRACTOR agrees to require that no contract used by any subcontractor or contracts CONTRACTOR enters into on behalf of DISTRICT will reserve the right to charge back to DISTRICT the cost of insurance required by this Contract. CONTRACTOR agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors or others with whom CONTRACTOR contracts with on behalf of DISTRICT will be submitted to DISTRICT for review Failure of DISTRICT to request copies of such agreement will not impose any liability on DISTRICT or its employees. 13 If CONTRACTOR is a Limited Liability Company general liability coverage must be amended so that the Limited Liability Company and its managers, affiliates, employees, agents, and other persons necessary or incidental to its operation are insured. 14 CONTRACTOR agrees to provide immediate notice to DISTRICT of any claim or loss against CONTRACTOR that includes DISTRICT as a defendant. DISTRICT assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right(but not the duty)to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve DISTRICT 34. Indemnification. CONTRACTOR and DISTRICT agree that DISTRICT should,to the fullest extent permitted by law be fully protected from any loss, injury damage, claim, lawsuit, cost, expense, attorneys fees, litigation costs, defense costs, court costs or any other cost arising out of or in any way related to the performance of this Contract. Accordingly the provisions of this indemnity provision are intended by the parties to be interpreted and construed to provide the fullest protection possible under the law to the DISTRICT except for liability attributable to the DISTRICT'S active negligence. CONTRACTOR acknowledges that DISTRICT would not enter into this Contract in the absence of this commitment from CONTRACTOR to indemnify and protect DISTRICT asset forth here. To the fullest extent permitted by law and excepting only the active negligence of DISTRICT established by a court of competent jurisdiction or written agreement between the parties, CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless DISTRICT its employees, agents and officials,from any liability claims,suits,actions,arbitration proceedings,administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, actual attorney fees incurred by DISTRICT court costs,interest,defense costs including expert witness fees and any other costs or expenses of any kind whatsoever without restriction or limitation incurred in relation to, as a consequence of or arising out of or in any way attributable actually allegedly or impliedly in whole or in part to the performance of this Contract. Allobligations under this provision are to be paid by CONTRACTOR as incurred by DISTRICT Without affecting the rights of DISTRICT under any provision of this Contract or this Section, CONTRACTOR shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless DISTRICT as set forth above for liability attributable to the active negligence of DISTRICT provided such active negligence is determined by agreement between the parties or the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. This exception will apply only in instances where the DISTRICT is shown to have been actively negligent and not in instances where CONTRACTOR is solely or partially at fault or in instances where DISTRICT'S active negligence accounts for only a percentage of the liability involved. In those instances,the obligation of CONTRACTOR will be for that portion or percentage of liability not attributable to the active negligence of DISTRICT as determined by written agreement between the parties or the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. The obligations of CONTRACTOR under this or any other provision of this Contract will not be limited bythe provisions of any workers'compensation act orsimilaract. CONTRACTOR expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statutes or laws as to DISTRICT its employees and officials. CONTRACTOR agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreementswith provisions identical to those set forth in this section from each and every subcontractor sub-tier contractor or any other person or entity involved by for with, or on behalf of CONTRACTOR in the performance of the subject matter of this Contract. In the event CONTRACTOR fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required here, CONTRACTOR agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of DISTRICT to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on DISTRICT and will in noway act as a waiver of any rights hereunder Thisobligation to indemnify and defend DISTRICT as set forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns, or heirs of CONTRACTOR and shall survive the termination of this Contract or this section. 35. Permits. The CONTRACTOR shall obtain from DISTRICT City County State, Federal or other responsible public agencies all licenses and permits, and pay all fees related thereto, necessary to complete the job 36. Assignment. No assignment by the CONTRACTOR of this Contract or any part hereof, or of funds to be received hereunder will be recognized by the DISTRICT unless such assignment has had prior written approval and consent of the DISTRICT and the Surety 37 Safety and Site Condition. CONTRACTOR shall perform all operations with due regard for safety and in strict compliance with all applicable laws relating thereto It shall be CONTRACTOR'S responsibility to keep the site in a clean, neat and orderly condition. It shall also be CONTRACTOR'S duty to dust-palliate all working areas and access routes, if applicable. All operations shall be conducted by CONTRACTOR so that no fire hazards are created. 38. Utility Location. DISTRICT acknowledges its responsibilities with respectto locating facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215. 39. Trenehina. If this Contract involves digging trenches or other excavations that extend deeper than four feet below the surface, CONTRACTOR shall promptly and before the following conditions are disturbed, notify the District Engineer in writing, of any, (a) Material that the CONTRACTOR believes may be material that is hazardous waste, as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code,that is required to be removed to a Class I, Class II, or Class III disposal site in accordance with provisions of existing law (b) Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those indicated. (c) Unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the Contract. (d) The District Engineer shall promptly investigate the conditions, and if he finds that the conditions do materially so differ or do involve hazardous waste, and cause a decrease or increase in the CONTRACTOR'S cost of,or the time required for performance of any part of the work, shall issue a change order in accordance with the procedures described in this Contract. (e) In the event that a dispute arises between District Engineer and the CONTRACTOR whether the conditions materially differ or involve hazardous waste,or cause a decrease or increase in the CONTRACTORS cost of or time required for performance of any part of the work,the CONTRACTOR shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date provided for by the Contract, but shall proceed with all work to be performed under the Contract. The CONTRACTOR shall retain any and all rights provided either by contract or by law which pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the contracting parties. 40. Notices. The parties hereto agree that all formal notices required by this Contract may be provided to the following persons at the following addresses by sending the same by certified or registered mail as follows: DISTRICT District Engineer Costa Mesa Sanitary District 628 W 19th Street Costa Mesa, California 92627-2716 CONTRACTOR: t�G rN.�GoyWll1 INS FA (A Ilyki flur, St ontt,r i0,CA- A 11tM 41 Effect of Invalidity The invalidity in whole or in part of any provisions hereof shall not affect the validity of any other provision. 42. Gratuities.CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees,agents or representatives has offered or given any gratuities to DISTRICT'S employees, agents or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 43. Conflict of Interest. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any architect,engineer or other preparer of the plans and specifications for this project. 44 Copeland Anti-Kickback' Act. If applicable to this Contract,CONTRACTOR and its subcontractors shall comply with the provisions of the Copeland Anti-Kickback' Act(18 t1SC Section 874), as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations, which Act provides that each Contractor shall be prohibited from requiring, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion or repair of any public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he is otherwise entitled. 45. Final Closeout AAreement and Release of All Claims. Prior to filing the Notice of Completion the CONTRACTOR and DISTRICT shall execute and record a Final Closeout Agreement and Release of All Claims. 46. Guarantees. CONTRACTOR shall and hereby does guarantee all work for a period of one (1)year after the date of filing of the Notice of Completion and shall repair and replace any and all such work,togetherwith any other work which may be displaced in so doing that may prove defective in workmanship and/or materials within the one(1)year period from date of the filing of the Notice of Completion, without expense whatsoever to the DISTRICT ordinary wear and tear and usual abuse or neglect excepted. In the event of failure to comply with the aforementioned conditions within five (5) days after being notified in writing, the DISTRICT is hereby authorized to proceed to have the defects repaired and made good at the expense of the CONTRACTOR,who shall pay the cost and charges therefor immediately on demand. 47 Job Progress. CONTRACTOR agrees to maintain a critical path analysis throughout the project. CONTRACTOR agrees to meet with the District Engineer on a weekly or other periodic basis, or as requested by the District Engineer to review job progress. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide District Engineer with critical path analysis documentation wheneverjob progress is impacted so that the completion date may be affected or whenever delays or other impacts may give rise to CONTRACTOR'S claim for additional days oradditicnal damages. Delay and other claims of damages based on CONTRACTOR'S planned early completion are prohibited. 48. Resolution of Claims. For all claims that are less than Three Hundred and Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($375,000.00) the provisions of Public Contracts Code Section 20104 at seq. (Article 1 5—Resolution of Construction Claims) shall be followed. 49. Notice to Contractor of Claims. DISTRICT shall provide noticeto CONTRACTOR upon receipt of any third-party claim related to the Contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have entered into this agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT Joan Revak Robert Ooten Clerk of the District President of the Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONTRACTOR Name: T'L ,( C14140yo Colin R. Burns Associate District Counsel Address; (�)w ttr SI" AiRvi CA Qlb APPROVED AS TO CONTENT By- ()LtVLF1 �'rl1W✓1 VlfliQV��S)CCvt� Robin . Ha ers District Engineer STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ss (INDIVIDUAL)/(CORPORATION) COUNTY OF ) On 2011 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said state, personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged tome that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signalure(s)on the instrument the person(s) or the entity on behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (Notary Public) CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ewe CODE s 116e rrr<x a4564rraCODPC cexerxm nrrvrceu:nsrar. namm,snrrcusncoaarx. :rawv:rmx>rr:r.,r.r.,I State of California Countyof ��{1 ��VVIQi1rL11*10 } k On 11-1-11 before me, V4K,� _ M 4 Ulu aft A Ed W I bib LC oeu 7� w Iny��nrv�yy.,, naTM of ma personally appeared !/� «'� ITY"l 11(T— tx ai epn ray who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persoI whose names) isI subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sJ,i6/tpey executed the same in his/hg// eu authorized capacityods), and that by WONNE MCLELLAN his/her/llfair signatureO on the instrument the Commission/ 1798268 person or the entity upon behalf of which the San Bernardino County Notary Public Cuuemla person( acted, executed the instrument. i Comm.Exproh,May I6.2012 I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. l I I• WITNESS my hand and fofficial seal. Signature:Y&K,(I NfCI'P.�iL<Gbl I. Re No.,and Ant 9pnew of NMery Pudc ' OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law It may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of thus form to another document. Description of Attached Document I' Title or Type of Document: Document Dale: Number of Pages. Signers)Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies)Claimed by Signal Signer's Name: Signer's Name ❑ Corporate Officer—Tltle(s): ❑Corporate Officer—Tltle(s): O Individual ❑Individual ❑ Penner—❑Umited ❑General ❑Paner—❑Limited OGeneralP Top of rhumb here ❑ Attorney In Fact ❑Attorney In Fact o Trustee ❑Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other' ❑Other I Signer IS Representing: Signer Is Representing rcsv^ w^wcwww.'w.wwvcawew^sw^sw _.___._ -n..+3ciwuruvcswu+_.+w�Lw+_ .no Ne.el RN.,in 940 NOW BINdBry IX9 I'WmUN NOTARY n B00'97eea7) Item 45907 Charles King Company 2841 Gardena Ave., Signal Hill, CA 90755 Telephone(562)426-2974 Fax (562) 426-9714 Contractors License#738236 September 7, 2016 Mr. Gary Prater Sent Via Email construction(a).ocsd.com Principal Contracts Administrator Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Award Protest Re: Project 6-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Mr. Prater: This letter responds to the bid protest of W.A. Rasic Construction Company, Inc. ("Rasic"), concerning the award of the referenced project to Charles King Company("CKC"). Apparently disappointed that its bid came in higher than CKC's, and for its own benefit rather than the public's, Rasic seizes on an immaterial bid deviation in an attempt to take the project for itself at an increased cost to taxpayers. The number of lineal feet in pipe bursting experience was irrelevant to the determination of the low bidder and did not give CKC a competitive advantage. As set forth in detail below, CKC is the lowest responsive, responsible bidder for the project and the Orange County Sanitation District ("District")should proceed with its planned award of a contract to CKC. 1. Background On July 26, 2016, the District received bids for the project. CKC submitted a bid to construct the project for$3,699,301.00. Included in CKC's bid is$138,000.00 for a subcontractor, Mocon Corp. ("Mocon"), to perform the pipe-bursting work. Mocon is one of the preeminent pipe- bursting subcontractors in Southern California and has performed thousands of feet of pipe bursting operations on publicly owned projects. As detailed on the enclosed reference, Mocon has performed pipe bursting work in excess of 1,000 feet on at least seven publicly owned projects. (Tab 1.) In addition, CKC, as subcontractor to RePipe, participated in all pipe bursting activities related to the the installation of more than 700 feet of 12" pipe on the Bristol Street Sewer Replacement Phase II project("Bristol Project")and successfully completed pipe bursting operations on other publicly owned projects throughout California. CKC is fully trained in the proper methods and procedures to perform the requisite pipe bursting operations on this project. (Tab 2.) With its total bid of$3,699,301.00, CKC submitted the lowest bid for the project. Rasic was the second lowest bidder, with a bid price of$5,664,100.00, which is $1,964,799.00 higher than CKC's bid. 1 2. Competitive Bidding Laws Are For The Benefit Of The Public Not Private Interests Courts have consistently found that California's public bidding statutes are intended to benefit the taxpaying public, not private bidders. The principle was stated succinctly in Eel River Disposal and Resource Recovery, Inc. v. Humboldt(2013)221 Cal.AppAth 209, 232: "[s]tatutes and ordinances that authorize or require competitive bidding in the letting of public contracts ordinarily serve the purpose 'of inviting competition, to guard against favoritism, improvidence, extravagance, fraud and corruption, and to secure the best work or supplies at the lowest price practicable."' (Domer Electric, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles(1994) 9 Cal.4th 161, 173.) Such measures "'are enacted for the benefit of property holders and taxpayers, and not for the benefit or enrichment of bidders, and should be so construed and administered as to accomplish such purpose fairly and reasonably with sole reference to the public interest. These provisions are strictly construed by the courts, and will not be extended beyond their reasonable purpose. Competitive bidding provisions must be read in the light of the reason for their enactment, or they will be applied where they were not intended to operate and thus deny municipalities authority to deal with problems in a sensible, practical way.' [Citation.] [Laws] requiring competitive bidding are not to be given such a construction as to defeat the object of insuring economy and excluding favoritism and corruption. [Citations.]" (ibid.) Rasic wants to turn this principle on its head. Without establishing any possibility of"favoritism, improvidence, extravagance, fraud [or] corruption," Rasic simply seeks to exploit CKC's immaterial deviation in qualifications for an extremely small portion of the work on the project, solely for Rasic's own benefit. Rasic does not even attempt to make an argument of how the public would benefit from an award to Rasic, nor could it. "It certainly would amount to a disservice to the public if a losing bidder were to be permitted to comb through the bid proposal or license application of the low bidder after the fact, [and] cancel the low bid on minor technicalities, with the hope of securing acceptance of his, a higher bid. Such construction would be adverse to the best interests of the public and contrary to public policy.' [Citation.]" (Ghilotti Construction Co. v. City of Richmond, (1996)45 Cal.App.4th 897, 908 -909.) With a bid price nearly$2,000,000.00 higher than CKC, the only party to benefit from a rejection of CKC's bid is Rasic. 3. The District May Waive Minor Bid Irregularities "A basic rule of competitive bidding is that bids must conform to specifications, and that if a bid does not so conform, it may not be accepted. [Citations.] However, it is further well established that a bid which substantially conforms to a call for bids may, though it is not strictly responsive, be accepted if the variance cannot have affected the amount of the bid or given a bidder an advantage or benefit not allowed other bidders or, in other words, if the variance is inconsequential. [Citation.]" (Ghilotti, supra, 45 Cal.App.4th at p. 904 [citations omitted].) As a matter of law, the District has the right to reject bids or to waive immaterial or inconsequential errors. "An agency has discretion to waive immaterial deviations from bid specifications and may accept the bid under certain conditions. The point of discretion is that the agency may properly act in either direction. It may waive or refuse to waive such deviations." (MCM Const. Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco(1998)66 Cal.App.4th 359, 374.) Here, the District expressly reserved to itself this right. Specifically, section IB-18(8)of the IFB states: OCSD may "waive any errors or informalities in any Bid...." "The question '"[w]hether in any given case a bid varies substantially or only inconsequentially from the call for bids is a question of fact. ' [Citation.]" (Ghilotti, supra, 45 Cal.AppAth at p. 906, 53 Cal.Rptr.2d 389.) As reflected in the authority summarized above, "[t]o be considered inconsequential, a deviation must neither give the bidder an unfair competitive advantage nor otherwise defeat the goals of insuring economy and preventing corruption in the public contracting process."' (Id. at p. 900, 53 Cal.Rptr.2d 389.) "These considerations must be evaluated from a practical rather than a hypothetical standpoint, with reference to the factual circumstances of the case. They must also be viewed in light of the public interest, rather than 2 the private interest of a disappointed bidder." (Bay Cities Paving & Grading, Inc. v. City of San Leandro(2014)223 Cal.App.4th 1181, 1189.) With the principles enunciated above in mind, it is obvious that the District has the right, and the factual foundation, to conclude that the 300-foot discrepancy in experience related to pipe bursting operations is inconsequential. The discrepancy did not give CKC a competitive advantage or"otherwise defeat the goals of insuring economy and preventing corruption in the public contracting process." 4. CKC's Bid Deviation Is Immaterial And Did Not Give CKC A Competitive Advantage CKC's bid is responsive on all counts. The District's factual inquiry regarding pipe bursting experience relates to contractor experience and ability to perform the project. Contractor experience is irrelevant to whether the bid itself meets the technical requirements of the IFB. Here, the deviation of CKC's identified work experience for pipe bursting operations is immaterial. First, the pipe bursting scope of work constitutes 3.7 percent of CKC's total bid, and is not a significant portion of the work on the project. Second, there is a small difference between 700 and 1,000 feet; both amounts demonstrate significant experience in performing pipe bursting operations on publicly funded projects. Finally, both CKC and its subcontractor, MOCON, have experience sufficient to demonstrate they are capable of performing the work in a satisfactory manner. Summarily, whether the project cited by CKC for work experience was a project of 700 or 1,000 feet, is immaterial to the responsiveness of the bid. Further, CKC's minor deviation in pipe bursting experience did not give it a competitive advantage over the other bidders on the project because it did not affect CKC's price. Rasic attempts to frame the deviation as giving CKC an advantage over some unspecified group of parties who may have wanted to bid the project but didn't. This position is unfounded. The bottom line is CKC's price was not affected by its citation of the Bristol Project as an exemplar of its pipe bursting experience and did not give CKC an advantage over Rasic or any other contractor that actually turned in a bid. Accordingly, the District should waive the immaterial deviation and affirm its award of the project to CKC as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. 5. Conclusion Rasic's bid protest attempts to challenge the responsiveness of CKC's bid, but actually focuses on whether CKC is a responsible bidder, which it is. However, to the extent the District finds there is any merit to Rasic's responsibility challenge, the District is required to hold a hearing at which CKC can present evidence providing beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is responsible and qualified. There is no basis for Rasic's assertion CKC is not responsible. CKC is eminently qualified and, in the interest of the taxpayers, the District can and should waive wave the immaterial deviation and award the project to CKC. Sincerely, Steve Radaich Project Manager Enclosures 3 TAB 1 AFAMU V 82-204 Hwy 111, Suite C-201, Indio,CA 92201 (760)564-2536 Fax(760)564-3646 Contractors License No. 565735 Class A Mocon Corp has Successfully completed the following projects by the Pipe Bursting Method Project: Trimble Rd Sanitary Sewer Improvements Contractor: Sanco Pipeline Year: June 2014 Project description: Rehbilitated existing 12"sewer with 20"HDPE pipe by the pipe bursting method. 2137 LF Pneumatic Project location: San Jose, CA Dollar Amount: $209,426 Forman: Robert Morrow Owner: City of San Jose Owner Contact: Chris Hanson Owner Phone: 408-377-2793 Project:Magnolia Ave Trunk Line Rehabilitation Contractor:Maggiora&Ghilotti Year: June 2015 Project description: Rehbilitated existing 21"sewer with 22"HDPE pipe by the pipe bursting method. 1105 LF Pneumatic Project location: Larkspur,CA Dollar Amount: $169,195 Forman: Robert Morrow Owner: Ross Valley Sanitary Dist Owner Contact: RVSD Owner Phone: (415)461-1122 Project: Sewer Replacement Project Contractor: Vasilj Year: June 2013 Project description: Upsizing existing sewers by the pipe bursting method. 10"=11,677 LF, 12"=14,844 LF, 16"=1,125 LF,20"=695 LF Pneumatic Project location: Covina,CA Dollar Amount: $1,620,639.29 Forman: Robert Morrow Owner: City of Covina, CA Owner Contact: Kalieh Honish Owner Phone: (626)384-5227 Project description: 10,800 LF of Existing 12 inch Replaced with 20 inch—Templeton Sewer Interceptor Project location: Paso Robles,CA Dollar Amount: $680,000 Forman: Robert Morrow Owner: City of Paso Robles Owner Contact: Mike Columbo Owner Phone: (805)237-3865 Project: Mandem Road Sewer Rehabilitation Contractor: Colich and Sons Year: 1998 Project description: 3,000 LF of Existing 15 inch Replaced by 24 inch 2,500 LF of Existing 12 inch Replaced by 22 inch Pipe being replaced was under the water table. Project location: Simi Valley Dollar Amount: $740,000 Forman: Bob Morrow Owner: City of Simi Valley Owner Contact: John Behjan Owner Phone: (805)583-6404 Project description: Pipe Burst 10 inch Replaced with 18 inch 3001f—Palm City Trunk Sewer Project location: San Diego, CA Dollar Amount: $169,200 Forman: Robert Morrow Owner: City of San diego Owner Contact: Owner Phone: Project: Construction of Relief Sewers,Coolage,Brookdale,and MacArthur Contractor: Mocon Corp Year: 2007 Project description: 800 LF of Existing IS"Pipe Bursted to 24"HDPE+other various work and 2,200 If of 10"VCP to 14"HDPE Project location: Oakland,CA Dollar Amount: $2,345,000 Owner: City of Oakland—Public Works Agency Owner Contact: Phillip Fung Owner Phone: (510)238-2938 Project: Pacific Avenue and 10 Street Sewer Project Contractor: Mike Perlich and Sons Year: 2005 Project description: 2,350 LF of Existing 12 inch Replaced with 19.5 inch- Pipe was far below the water table Project location:West Minister,CA Dollar Amount: $490,000 - Forman: Bob Morrow Owner: Midway Sanitay District Owner Contact: Don Greek(deceased) Owner Phone: (714)568.0200 ext 207 Project: FY 2014/15 Pipeline Rehabilitation Project Contractor: Maggiora&Ghilotti Year:June 2015 Project description: Rehabilitated existing 12"sewer with 18"HDPE pipe by the pipe bursting method. 1287 LF Project location: Larkspur,CA Dollar Amount: $141,570 Forman: Robert Morrow Owner: Ross Valley Sanitary Dist Owner Contact: RVSD Owner Phone: (415)461-1122 Project: Alvarado Trunk Sewer Improvements Contractor: Palm Eng Year: 2016 Project description: Rehbilitated existing 12"sewer with 20"HDPE pipe by the pipe bursting method. 745 LF Project location:La Mesa,CA Dollar Amount: $186,455 Forman: Robert Morrow Owner: City of La Mesa CA Owner Contact: Scott Adamson Owner Phone: (858)243-4977 Project: Huntington Drive Sewer Replacement Contractor: Vasilj Year: June 2016 Project description: Upsizing existing sewers by the pipe bursting method. 10"VCP to 14"HDPE 2000LF Project location: Arcadia, CA Dollar Amount: $1,620,639.29 Forman: Robert Morrow Owner: City of Arcadia,CA Owner Contact: Owner Phone: 1 Project:N.Cannon Beach Interchange Contractor: Huffman-Wright Year:2002 Project description: 250 LF of Existing 24 inch Replaced by 28 inch Existing pipe was reinforced concrete 40-50 R deep under Hwy 101 Project location: Cannon Beach,Oregon Dollar Amount: $72,000 Forman: Bob Morrow Owner: Oregon Department of Transportation Owner Contact: John Woodroof Owner Phone: (503)986-3366 Project: SSRP T06A—Anaheim&Broad St and SSRP T068-Fries Ave&Pier St Contractor: Vasilj Inc Year: 2013 Project description:Pipe Burst 4,382 LF of exiting 12"and 14"VCP and replace with 16"HDPE. 1236 If of 8"and 1164LF of 8-12"pipe burst Project location:Wilmington CA Dollar Amount: $457,780 Forman: Robert Morrow Owner: City of Los Angeles Owner Contact: Lynn Cummings Owner Phone: (310)732-4693 Total Footage 64,597 LF If you have any additional questions feel free to contact Robert Morrow at 503-580-4420 -13 2 \�, 2020 East New York St.,Aurora, IL60502 TT Technologies Phone(a30)061 e2000R(800)633207e Fax:(830)861-8299 www.tttechnologlas.com E-mail:A InfoGtttechnolo9las.com a PIPE BURSTING • PIPE RAMMING • HORIZONTAL BORING • DIRECTIONAL DRILLING September 1, 2016 Re: Charles King Company 2841 Gardena Ave. Signal Hill, CA 90755 To Whom It May Concern: This letter confirms Charles King Company was formally trained in 2010 on the proper methods and procedures on how to correctly operate the GRUNDOCRACK Pneumatic Pipe Bursting System and GRUNDOWINCH constant Tension Winch used for pneumatic pipe bursting and slip lining. We continue to work with the Charles King Company and provide technical training and support as needed. Much of our skill and knowledge has been gained from pipe bursting in excess of 4,000,000 feet of pipe with our customers over the past 45 years. Our technical personnel are available as needed to support Charles King Company field personnel on the proper operation of the GRUNDOCRACK pipe bursting equipment. We want to make sure every pipe bursting job is a successful pipe bursting job. If you have additional requirements or need anything else, please call me at(805)-404-5973. Sincerely, e, Regional Manager amalla kis(atttechnolooies.com www.tttechnoloaies.com F ing. Orange County Sanitation District heiea m 10844 Ellis Avenue,Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Br 714.962.2411 • www.ocstl Buena Park September 9, 2016 Via Overnight Courier Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Walter Rasic W.A. Rasic Construction Garden Grove 4150 Long Beach Blvd. Huntington Beach Long Beach, CA 90807 Irvine SUBJECT: OCSD Response to W.A. Rasic Construction Award Protest Re: Project No. 8-17, District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief La Habra La Palma Los Alamitos This letter responds to the Award Protest filed by W.A. Rasic Construction (Rasic) dated August 23, 2016, protesting the Orange County Sanitation Newport Beach District's (OCSD) solicitation and bid evaluation process and recommendation for award of the above referenced project to Charles King Company, Inc. Orange (CKC). Placentia In summary, Rasic contests: 1.) CKC's demonstrated experience with the pipe Santa Ana bursting method of pipe installation; 2.) CKC's role on one of their listed projects demonstrating such experience; and, 3.)that OCSD, in requiring each bidder to Seal Beach meet certain minimum experience requirements as identified in the Invitation For Stant Bids (IFB), acted to"shrink"the pool of potential bidders. Tustin The Bid Forms, BF-4 PERFORMANCE HISTORY AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES, A. LIST OF CURRENT AND COMPLETED PROJECTS AND Villa Park EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS, was modified twice. The first modification County of orange was in Addendum No. 1 to replace the first paragraph in its entirety, and add the words "Bidder's role" in the third sentence of sub items A.1., A.2., and A.3. Costa Mesa Addendum No. 3 modified sub item A.3. by reducing the minimum diameter Sanitary District pipe from 15"to 12" as follows: Midway City "The Bidder shall list at least one (1) pipeline project with a public owner Sanitary District completed within the last eight (8) years involving installation of Irvine Ranch minimum 12-inch diameter pipe via pipe bursting for a length of 1,000 Water District feet or more. Bidder's listed projects shall be similar in nature, scope, Yorba Linda complexity and cost to this Project. For each listed project, Bidder shall Water District include the project name and location, Bidder's role, description of work, length, diameter and material of qualifying pipe, final contract value, contract completion date, contact name(s) and phone number(s). The Bidder must submit this Information with Its Bid." Our Mission: 7o protect public health and the environment by providing effective wastewater collection, treatment, and recycling. O,H\N SPNliq ii •9 2 f, Z iNF E Y\ Walter Rasic Page 2 of 3 Rasic alleges that CKC did not meet the minimum experience requirements for this item under two scenarios: 1.) CKC listed Bristol Street Sewer Replacement Phase II (Bristol) project for the construction of only 703LF of pipe via the pipe bursting method instead of 1,000LF as indicated on their Bid Form, and 2.)that CKC listed that it directly supervised the work, therefore suggesting it was the prime contractor when actually, the prime contractor was Repipe California, Inc. During the evaluation of bids, OCSD independently established that the Bristol project consisted of approximately 700LF of pipe bursting. OCSD also verified that CKC's other listed project, Various Locations Citywide Sewer Main Rehab, City of Camarillo, included approximately 400LF of pipe bursting. The requirement as stated above is for the Bidder to list"at least one (1) pipeline project...for a length of 1,000 feet or more." This item does not require each project to be 1,000 feet or more. This is distinctly different than item A. 2., which requires "...at least two (2) pipeline projects...for a length of 2,000 feet or more for each proiect." Added together, the total length is approximately 1,100 feet as verified by OCSD. Therefore, OCSD determined that the minimum length of 1,000 feet was met by CKC. Next, Rasic alleges that CKC "...indicated that it directly supervised the work on the Bristol Street Project, suggesting that it was the prime contractor'. OCSD will not engage in speculation whether or not this is true, and considers this irrelevant to making a determination of whether or not CKC met this requirement. However, OCSD did ensure that CKC met the standards required. The requirement states in the first paragraph of BF-4 A., "...Using the table below, the Bidder shall provide its list of projects to demonstrate that it has either self-performed or directly supervised a Subcontractor(s) on the following three (3) criteria below..." OCSD verified that that CKC did perform as a Subcontractor under Repipe on the Bristol project and self-performed the pipe bursting work, and verified that CKC self-performed the work on the listed City of Camarillo project. Therefore, OCSD determined that CKC met the bid requirement to either self-perform or directly supervise the pipe bursting work. Finally, Rasic alleges that OCSD limited the pool of potential bidders by requiring them to meet certain experience requirements as stated in the IFB. N � PH,igii •9 A J fCt�� iME J Walter Rasic Page 3 of 3 Pursuant to the Instructions to Bidders IB-29, a Solicitation Phase protest may be filed by any Bidder or Prospective Bidder (on solicitation, Interested Party) .who has reason to believe that a free and open competition has not taken place or that a particular specification or requirement is impractical, unduly restrictive, or ambiguous...by submitting a detailed Solicitation Protest Statement in accordance with the requirements ..." set forth in Section A of the Instructions. If Rasic believed that the experience requirements were impractical or unduly restrictive, it could have submitted such a protest statement; however, no Solicitation Protest Statement was submitted by Rasic or any other prospective bidder. Therefore, it is too late to challenge the bid requirements. OCSD takes seriously the need to follow all statutes, codes and ordinances in the solicitation of its contracts and to promote open, fair competition. In fact, to allow more potential bidders to meet the Bid requirements, in Addendum No. 3 OCSD reduced the minimum diameter size for the pipe bursting experience requirement from 15" in diameter to 12" in diameter. OCSD has carefully reviewed the bid submitted by Charles King Company, Inc. In accordance with statutory requirements and OCSD's procedures, and has determined that the bid submitted by Charles King Company, Inc. is responsive and responsible. OCSD reviewed the Rasic Award Protest and arguments raised therein protesting the award of Project No. 6-17 to Charles King Company, Inc. OCSD finds that the Award Protest Statement is without merit on both allegations of (1) not meeting the pipe bursting minimum length requirement and (2) Charles King Company, Inc.'s role on the Bristol project. Regarding the third allegation, OCSD finds that it does not comply with the requirements set forth in IB-29 for the submission of a Solicitation Phase Protest. OCSD will proceed to recommend award of the Project No. 6-17 to the lowest responsive and responsible Bidder, Charles King Company, Inc., at the Board of Directors meeting on September 28, 2016. 'Marc Dubois Contracts, Purchasing and Materials Management Division Manager MD:GVP:yp PART A CONTRACT AGREEMENT C-CA-121914 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTRACT AGREEMENT SECTION - 1 GENERAL CONDITIONS..................................................................1 SECTION -2 MATERIALS AND LABOR.................................................................4 SECTION -3 PROJECT..........................................................................................4 SECTION -4 PLANS AND SPECIFICATONS ........................................................5 SECTION -5 TIME OF COMMENCEMENT AND COMPLETION ..........................5 SECTION -6 TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE .............................................................5 SECTION -7 EXCUSABLE DELAYS......................................................................6 SECTION -8 EXTRA WORK...................................................................................6 SECTION -9 CHANGES IN PROJECT...................................................................7 SECTION - 10 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES FOR DELAY.............................................7 SECTION - 11 CONTRACT PRICE AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.........................7 SECTION - 12 SUBSTITUTION OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF RETENTION OF FUNDS ..............................................................................................9 SECTION - 13 COMPLETION.................................................................................10 SECTION - 14 CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION.......................10 SECTION - 15 SURETY BONDS ............................................................................12 SECTION - 16 INSURANCE....................................................................................13 SECTION - 17 RISK AND INDEMNIFICATION.......................................................22 SECTION - 18 TERMINATION................................................................................22 SECTION - 19 WARRANTY....................................................................................23 SECTION -20 ASSIGNMENT.................................................................................23 SECTION -21 RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES ........................................................24 SECTION -22 SAFETY& HEALTH ........................................................................24 SECTION -23 NOTICES.........................................................................................24 C-CA-121914 CONTRACT AGREEMENT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 6.17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into, to be effective, this September 28, 2016, by and between Charles King Company, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR"and the Orange County Sanitation District, hereinafter referred to as "OCSD". WITNESSETH That for and in consideration of the promises and agreements hereinafter made and exchanged, OCSD and CONTRACTOR agree as follows: SECTION-1 GENERAL CONDITIONS CONTRACTOR certifies and agrees that all the terms, conditions and obligations of the Contract Documents as hereinafter defined, the location of the job site, and the conditions under which the Work is to be performed have been thoroughly reviewed, and enters into this Contract based upon CONTRACTOR's investigation of all such matters and is in no way relying upon any opinions or representations of OCSD. It is agreed that this Contract represents the entire agreement. It is further agreed that the Contract Documents are each incorporated into this Contract by reference, with the same force and effect as if the same were set forth at length herein, and that CONTRACTOR and its Subcontractors, if any, will be and are bound by any and all of said Contract Documents insofar as they relate in any part or in any way, directly or indirectly, to the Work covered by this Contract. A. Contract Documents Order of Precedence "Contract Documents" refers to those documents identified in the definition of"Contract Documents" in the General Conditions—Definitions. C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 1 of 25 1. In the event of a conflict between one Contract Document and any of the other Contract Documents, the provisions in the document highest in precedence shall be controlling. The order of precedence of the Contract Documents is as follows: a. Supplemental Agreements—the last in time being the first in precedence b. Addenda issued prior to opening of Bids—the last in time being the first in precedence c. Contract Agreement d. Permits and other regulatory requirements e. Special Provisions f. General Conditions (GC) g. Notice Inviting Bids and Instruction to Bidders h. Geotechnical Baseline Report(GBR), if attached as a Contract Document I. Plans and Specifications—in these documents the order of precedence shall be: i. Specifications (Divisions 01-17) ii. Plans H. General Requirements (GR) iv. Standard Drawings and Typical Details j. CONTRACTOR'S Bid 2. In the event of a conflict between terms within an individual Contract Document, the conflict shall be resolved by applying the following principles as appears applicable: a. Figured dimensions on the Contract Documents shall govern. Dimensions not specified shall be as directed by the ENGINEER. Details not shown or specified shall be the same as similar parts that are shown or specified, or as directed. Full-size details shall take precedence over scale Drawings as to C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 2 of 25 shape and details of construction. Specifications shall govern as to material and workmanship. b. The Contract Documents calling for the higher quality material or workmanship shall prevail. Materials or Work described in words, which so applied, have a well known technical or trade meaning shall be deemed to refer to such recognized standards. In the event of any discrepancy between any Drawings and the figures thereon, the figures shall be taken as correct. C. Scale Drawings, full-size details, and Specifications are intended to be fully complementary and to agree. Should any discrepancy between Contract Documents come to the CONTRACTOR's attention, or should an error occur in the efforts of others, which affect the Work, the CONTRACTOR shall notify the ENGINEER, in writing, at once. In the event any doubts or questions arise with respect to the true meaning of the Contract Documents, reference shall be made to the ENGINEER whose written decision shall be final. If the CONTRACTOR proceeds with the Work affected without written instructions from the ENGINEER, the CONTRACTOR shall be fully responsible for any resultant damage or defect. d. Anything mentioned in the Specifications and not indicated in the Plans, or indicated in the Plans and not mentioned in the Specifications, shall be of like effect as if indicated and mentioned in both. In case of discrepancy in the Plans or Specifications, the matter shall be immediately submitted to OCSD's ENGINEER, without whose decision CONTRACTOR shall not adjust said discrepancy save only at CONTRACTOR's own risk and expense. The decision of the ENGINEER shall be final. C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 3 of 25 In all matters relating to the acceptability of material, machinery or plant equipment; classifications of material or Work; the proper execution, progress or sequence of the Work; and quantities interpretation of the Contract Documents, the decision of the ENGINEER shall be final and binding, and shall be a condition precedent to any payment under the Contract, unless otherwise ordered by the Board of Directors. B. Definitions Capitalized terms used in this Contract are defined in the General Conditions, Definitions. Additional terms may be defined in the Special Provisions. SECTION—2 MATERIALS AND LABOR CONTRACTOR shall furnish, under the conditions expressed in the Plans and Specifications, at CONTRACTOR'S own expense, all labor and materials necessary, except such as are mentioned in the Specifications to be furnished by OCSD, to construct and complete the Project, in good workmanlike and substantial order. If CONTRACTOR fails to pay for labor or materials when due, OCSD may settle such claims by making demand upon the Surety to this Contract. In the event of the failure or refusal of the Surety to satisfy said claims, OCSD may settle them directly and deduct the amount of payments from the Contract Price and any amounts due to CONTRACTOR. In the event OCSD receives a stop payment notice from any laborer or material supplier alleging non-payment by CONTRACTOR, OCSD shall be entitled to deduct all of its costs and expenses incurred relating thereto, including but not limited to administrative and legal fees. SECTION-3 PROJECT The Project is described as: PROJECT NO. 6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 4 of 25 SECTION-4 PLANS AND SPECIFICATONS The Work to be done is shown in a set of Plans and Specifications entitled: PROJECT NO. 6.17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF Said Plans and Specifications and any revision, amendments and addenda thereto are attached hereto and incorporated herein as part of this Contract and referred to by reference. SECTION—5 TIME OF COMMENCEMENT AND COMPLETION CONTRACTOR agrees to commence the Project within 15 calendar days from the date set forth in the "Notice to Proceed"sent by OCSD, unless otherwise specified therein and shall diligently prosecute the Work to completion within 567 calendar days from the date of the "Notice to Proceed" issued by OCSD, excluding delays caused or authorized by OCSD as set forth in Sections 7, 8, and 9 hereof, and applicable provisions in the General Conditions. The time for completion includes 12 calendar days determined by OCSD likely to be inclement weather when CONTRACTOR will be unable to work. In addition, CONTRACTOR shall accomplish such milestones within the periods of performance set forth in Appendix A of the Special Provisions entitled "Work Completion Schedule." SECTION—6 TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence of this Contract. As required by the Contract Documents, CONTRACTOR shall prepare and obtain approval of all shop drawings, details and samples, and do all other things necessary and incidental to the prosecution of CONTRACTOR's Work in conformance with an approved construction progress schedule. CONTRACTOR shall coordinate the Work covered by this Contract with that of all other contractors, subcontractors and of OCSD, in a manner that will facilitate the efficient completion of the entire Work and accomplish the required milestone(s), if any, by the applicable deadline(s) in accordance with C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 5 of 25 Section 5 herein. OCSD shall have the right to assert complete control of the premises on which the Work is to be performed and shall have the right to decide the time or order in which the various portions of the Work shall be installed or the priority of the work of subcontractors, and, in general, all matters representing the timely and orderly conduct of the Work of CONTRACTOR on the premises. SECTION—7 EXCUSABLE DELAYS CONTRACTOR shall only be excused for any delay in the prosecution or completion of the Project as specifically provided in General Conditions, "Extensions for Delay", and the General Requirements, "By CONTRACTOR or Others— Unknown Utilities during Contract Work". Extensions of time and extra compensation arising from such excusable delays will be determined in accordance with the General Conditions, "Extension of Time for Delay" and "Contract Price Adjustments and Payments", and extensions of time and extra compensation as a result of incurring undisclosed utilities will be determined in accordance with General Requirements, "By CONTRACTOR or Others— Unknown Utilities during Contract Work". OCSD's decision will be conclusive on all parties to this Contract. SECTION—S EXTRA WORK The Contract Price as set forth in Section 11, includes compensation for all Work performed by CONTRACTOR, unless CONTRACTOR obtains a Change Order signed by a designated representative of OCSD specifying the exact nature of the Extra Work and the amount of extra compensation to be paid all as more particularly set forth in Section 9 hereof and the General Conditions, "Request for Change (Changes at CONTRACTOR's Request)", "OWNER Initiated Changes", and "Contract Price Adjustments and Payments". In the event a Change Order is issued by OCSD pursuant to the Contract Documents, OCSD shall extend the time fixed in Section 5 for completion of the Project by the number of days, if C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 6 of 25 any, reasonably required for CONTRACTOR to perform the Extra Work, as determined by OCSD's ENGINEER. The decision of the ENGINEER shall be final. SECTION-9 CHANGES IN PROJECT OCSD may at any time, without notice to any Surety, by Change Order, make any changes in the Work within the general scope of the Contract Document, including but not limited to changes: 1. In the Specifications (including Drawings and designs); 2. In the time, method or manner of performance of the Work; 3. In OCSD-furnished facilities, equipment, materials, services or site; or 4. Directing acceleration in the performance of the Work. No change of period of performance or Contract Price, or any other change in the Contract Documents, shall be binding until the Contract is modified by a fully executed Change Order. All Change Orders shall be issued in accordance with the requirements set forth in the General Conditions, "Request for Change (Changes at CONTRACTOR's Request)" and "OWNER Initiated Changes'. SECTION—10 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES FOR DELAY Liquidated Damages shall be payable in the amounts and upon the occurrence of such events or failure to meet such requirements or deadlines as provided in the Special Provisions, "Liquidated Damages and Incentives." SECTION—11 CONTRACT PRICE AND METHOD OF PAYMENT A. OCSD agrees to pay and the CONTRACTOR agrees to accept as full consideration for the faithful performance of this Contract, subject to any additions or deductions as provided in approved Change Orders, the sum of Three Million Six Hundred Ninety-Nine Thousand Three Hundred and One Dollars ($3,699,301)as itemized on the Attached Exhibit"A". C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 7 of 25 Upon satisfaction of the conditions precedent to payment set forth in the General Requirements, Additional General Requirements and General Conditions (including but not limited to Sections entitled "Mobilization Payment Requirements"and "Payment Itemized Breakdown of Contract Lump Sum Prices"), there shall be paid to the CONTRACTOR an initial Net Progress Payment for mobilization. OCSD shall issue at the commencement of the job a schedule which shows: 1. A minimum of one payment to be made to the CONTRACTOR for each successive four(4)week period as the Work progresses, and 2. The due dates for the CONTRACTOR to submit requests for payment to meet the payment schedule. After the initial Net Progress Payment, and provided the CONTRACTOR submits the request for payment prior to the end of the day required to meet the payment schedule, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a Net Progress Payment on the corresponding monthly payment date set forth in the schedule. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the ENGINEER, stating that the Work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract Documents, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Payment applications shall also be accompanied with all documentation, records, and releases as required by the Contract, Exhibit A, Schedule of Prices, and General Conditions, "Payment for Work—General". The Total amount of Progress Payments shall not exceed the actual value of the Work completed as certified by OCSD's ENGINEER. The processing of payments shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the Work. C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 8 of 25 B. As used in this Section, the following defined terms shall have the following meanings: 1. "Net Progress Payment' means a sum equal to the Progress Payment less the Retention Amount and other qualified deductions (Liquidated Damages, stop payment notices, etc.). 2. "Progress Payment' means a sum equal to: a. the value of the actual Work completed since the commencement of the Work as determined by OCSD; b. plus the value of material suitably stored at the worksite, treatment plant or approved storage yards subject to or under the control of OCSD since the commencement of the Work as determined by OCSD; C. less all previous Net Progress Payments; d. less all amounts of previously qualified deductions; e. less all amounts previously retained as Retention Amounts. 3. "Retention Amount'for each Progress Payment means the percentage of each Progress Payment to be retained by OCSD to assure satisfactory completion of the Contract. The amount to be retained from each Progress Payment shall be determined as provided in the General Conditions—"Retained Funds; Substitution of Securities." SECTION-12 SUBSTITUTION OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF RETENTION OF FUNDS Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22300 at seq., the CONTRACTOR may, at its sole expense, substitute securities as provided in General Conditions—"Retained Funds; Substitution of Securities." C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 9 of 25 SECTION-13 COMPLETION Final Completion and Final Acceptance shall occur at the time and in the manner specified in the General Conditions, "Final Acceptance and Final Completion", "Final Payment" and Exhibit A- Schedule of Prices. Upon receipt of all documentation, records, and releases as required by the Contract from the CONTRACTOR, OCSD shall proceed with the Final Acceptance as specified in General Conditions. SECTION-14 CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION A. Davis-Bacon Act: CONTRACTOR will pay and will require all Subcontractors to pay all employees on said Project a salary or wage at least equal to the prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined by the Secretary of Labor in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act for each craft or type of worker needed to perform the Contract. The provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act shall apply only if the Contract is in excess of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00)and when twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the Contract is funded by federal assistance. If the aforesaid conditions are met, a copy of the provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act to be complied with are incorporated herein as a part of this Contract and referred to by reference. B. General Prevailing Rate: OCSD has been advised by the State of California Director of Industrial Relations of its determination of the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general prevailing rate for legal holiday and overtime Work in the locality in which the Work is to be performed for each craft or type of Work needed to execute this Contract, and copies of the same are on file in the Office of the ENGINEER of OCSD. The CONTRACTOR agrees that not less than said prevailing rates shall be paid to workers employed on this C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 10 of 25 public works Contract as required by Labor Code Section 1774 of the State of California. Per California Labor Code 1773.2, OCSD will have on file copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages at its principal office and at each job site, which shall be made available to any interested party upon request. C. Forfeiture for Violation: CONTRACTOR shall, as a penalty to OCSD, forfeit Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00)for each calendar day or portion thereof for each worker paid (either by the CONTRACTOR or any Subcontractor under it) less than the prevailing rate of per diem wages as set by the Director of Industrial Relations, in accordance with Sections 1770-1780 of the California Labor Code for the Work provided for in this Contract, all in accordance with Section 1775 of the Labor Code of the State of California. D. Apprentices: Sections 1777.5, 1777.6, 1777.7 of the Labor Code of the State of California, regarding the employment of apprentices are applicable to this Contract and the CONTRACTOR shall comply therewith if the prime contract involves Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000.00) or more. E. Workday: In the performance of this Contract, not more than eight(8) hours shall constitute a day's work, and the CONTRACTOR shall not require more than eight (8) hours of labor in a day from any person employed by him hereunder except as provided in paragraph (B)above. CONTRACTOR shall conform to Article 3, Chapter 1, Part 7 (Section 1810 at sea.)of the Labor Code of the State of California and shall forfeit to OCSD as a penalty, the sum of Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00)for each worker employed in the execution of this Contract by CONTRACTOR or any Subcontractor for each calendar day during which any worker is required or permitted to labor more than eight(8) hours in any one calendar day and forty C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 11 of 25 (40) hours in any one week in violation of said Article. CONTRACTOR shall keep an accurate record showing the name and actual hours worked each calendar day and each calendar week by each worker employed by CONTRACTOR in connection with the Project. F. Registration: Record of Wages: Inspection: CONTRACTOR shall comply with the registration requirements of Labor Code Section 1725.5. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4, the Work is subject to compliance monitoring by the California Department of Industrial Relations. CONTRACTOR shall maintain accurate payroll records and shall submit payroll records to the Labor Commissioner pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4(a)(3). Penalties for non-compliance with the requirements of Section 1776 may be deducted from progress payments per Section 1776. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the job site notices posting requirements established by the Labor Commissioner per Title 8, California Code of Regulations Section 16461(a). SECTION— 15 SURETY BONDS CONTRACTOR shall, before entering upon the performance of this Contract, furnish Bonds approved by OCSD's General Counsel—one in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the Contract amount, to guarantee the faithful performance of the Work, and the other in the amount of one hundred percent (100%)of the Contract amount to guarantee payment of all claims for labor and materials furnished. As changes to the Contract occur via approved Change Orders, the CONTRACTOR shall assure that the amounts of the Bonds are adjusted to maintain 100% of the Contract Price. This Contract shall not become effective until such Bonds are supplied to and approved by OCSD. Bonds must be issued by a Surety authorized by the State Insurance Commissioner to do business in California. The Performance Bond shall remain in full force and effect through the warranty period, as specified in Section 19 below. All Bonds required to be submitted relating to this Contract must comply with California Code of Civil Procedure Section 995.630. Each Bond shall be executed in the name of the Surety C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 12 of 25 insurer under penalty of perjury, or the fact of execution of each Bond shall be duly acknowledged before an officer authorized to take and certify acknowledgments, and either one of the following conditions shall be satisfied: A. A copy of the transcript or record of the unrevoked appointment, power of attorney, by- laws, or other instrument, duly certified by the proper authority and attested by the seal of the insurer entitling or authorizing the person who executed the Bond to do so for and on behalf of the insurer, is on file in the Office of the County Clerk of the County of Orange; or B. A copy of a valid power of attorney is attached to the Bond. SECTION— 16 INSURANCE CONTRACTOR shall purchase and maintain, for the duration of the Contract, insurance against claims for injuries to persons, or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Work hereunder, and the results of that Work by CONTRACTOR, its agents, representatives, employees, or Subcontractors, in amounts equal to the requirements set forth below. CONTRACTOR shall not commence Work under this Contract until all insurance required under this Section is obtained in a form acceptable to OCSD, nor shall CONTRACTOR allow any Subcontractor to commence Work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the Subcontractor has been obtained. CONTRACTOR shall maintain all of the foregoing insurance coverages in force through the point at which the Work under this Contract is fully completed and accepted by OCSD pursuant to the provisions of the General Conditions, "Final Acceptance and Final Completion'. Furthermore, CONTRACTOR shall maintain all of the foregoing insurance coverages in full force and effect throughout the warranty period, commencing on the date of Final Acceptance. The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance shall not derogate from the provisions for indemnification of OCSD by CONTRACTOR under Section 17 of this Contract. Notwithstanding nor diminishing the obligations of CONTRACTOR with respect to the foregoing, CONTRACTOR shall subscribe for C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 13 of 25 and maintain in full force and effect during the life of this Contract, inclusive of all changes to the Contract Documents made in accordance with the provisions of the General Conditions, "Request for Change (Changes at CONTRACTOR's Request)" and/or"OWNER Initiated Changes", the following insurance in amounts not less than the amounts specified. OCSD reserves the right to amend the required limits of insurance commensurate with the CONTRACTOR's risk at any time during the course of the Project. No vehicles may enter OCSD Premises/worksite without Possessing the required insurance coverage. CONTRACTOR's insurance shall also comply with all insurance requirements prescribed by agencies from whom permits shall be obtained for the Work and any other third parties from whom third party agreements are necessary to perform the Work (collectively, the "Third Parties"), The Special Provisions may list such requirements and sample forms and requirements from such Third Parties may be included in an attachment to the General Requirements. CONTRACTOR bears the responsibility to discover and comply with all requirements of Third Parties, including meeting specific insurance requirements, that are necessary for the complete performance of the Work. To the extent there is a conflict between the Third Parties' insurance requirements and those set forth by OCSD herein, the requirement(s) providing the more protective coverage for both CISCO and the Third Parties shall control and be purchased and maintained by CONTRACTOR. A. Limits of Insurance 1. General Liability: Twenty Million Dollars ($20,000,000) per occurrence and a general aggregate limit of Twenty Million Dollars ($20,000,000)for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Coverage shall include each of the following: a. Premises-Operations. b. Products and Completed Operations, with limits of at least Twenty Million Dollars ($20,000,000) per occurrence and a general aggregate limit of C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 14 of 25 Twenty Million Dollars ($20,000,000)which shall be in effect at all times during the warranty period set forth in the Warranty section herein, and as set forth in the General Conditions, "Warranty(CONTRACTOR's Guarantee)", plus any additional extension or continuation of time to said warranty period that may be required or authorized by said provisions. C. Broad Form Property Damage, expressly including damage arising out of explosion, collapse, or underground damage. d. Contractual Liability, expressly including the indemnity provisions assumed under this Contract. e. Separation of Insured Clause, providing that coverage applies separately to each insured, except with respect to the limits of liability. f. Independent CONTRACTOR's Liability. To the extent first dollar coverage, including defense of any claim, is not available to OCSD or any other additional insured because of any SIR, deductible, or any other form of self insurance, CONTRACTOR is obligated to assume responsibility of insurer until the deductible, SIR or other condition of insurer assuming its defense and/or indemnity has been satisfied. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible to pay any deductible or SIR. g. If a crane will be used, the General Liability insurance will be endorsed to add Riggers Liability coverage or its equivalent to cover the usage of the crane and exposures with regard to the crane operators, riggers and others involved in using the crane. h. If divers will be used, the General Liability insurance will be endorsed to cover marine liability or its equivalent to cover the usage of divers. C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 15 of 25 2. Automobile Liability: The CONTRACTOR shall maintain a policy of Automobile Liability Insurance on a comprehensive form covering all owned, non-owned, and hired automobiles, trucks, and other vehicles providing the following minimum limits of liability coverage: Either(1)a combined single limit of Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000) and a general aggregate limit of Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000)for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage; Or alternatively, (2) Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000) per person for bodily injury and Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) per accident for property damage. 3. Umbrella Excess Liability: The minimum limits of general liability and automobile liability insurance required, as set forth above, shall be provided for either in a single policy of primary insurance or a combination of policies of primary and umbrella excess coverage. Excess liability coverage shall be issued with limits of liability which, when combined with the primary insurance, will equal the minimum limits for general liability and automobile liability. 4. Drone Liability Insurance: If a drone will be used, drone liability insurance must be maintained by CONTRACTOR in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) in a form acceptable by OCSD. 5. Worker's Comoensation/Emolover's Liability: CONTRACTOR shall provide such Worker's Compensation Insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California, including employer's liability with a minimum limit of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. If an exposure to Jones Act liability may exist, the insurance required herein shall include coverage with regard to Jones Act claims. C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 16 of 25 Where permitted by law, CONTRACTOR hereby waives all rights of recovery by subrogation because of deductible clauses, inadequacy of limits of any insurance policy, limitations or exclusions of coverage, or any other reason against OCSD, its or their officers, agents, or employees, and any other contractor or subcontractor performing Work or rendering services on behalf of OCSD in connection with the planning, development and construction of the Project. In all its insurance coverages related to the Work, CONTRACTOR shall include clauses providing that each insurer shall waive all of its rights of recovery by subrogation against OCSD, its or their officers, agents, or employees, or any other contractor or subcontractor performing Work or rendering services at the Project. Where permitted by law, CONTRACTOR shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its Subcontractors of every tier. A waiver of subrogation shall be effective as to any individual or entity, even if such individual or entity (a)would otherwise have a duty of indemnification, contractual or otherwise, (b)did not pay the insurance premium, directly or indirectly, and (c)whether or not such individual or entity has an insurable interest in the property damaged. 6. Pollution Liability Insurance: CONTRACTOR shall purchase and maintain insurance for pollution liability covering bodily injury, property damage (including loss of use of damaged property or property that has not been physically injured or destroyed), cleanup costs, and defense costs (including costs and expenses for investigation, defense, or settlement of claims). Coverage shall carry limits of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) Dollars and shall apply to sudden and non-sudden pollution conditions (including sewage spills), both at the site or needed due to migration of pollutants from the site, resulting from the escape or release of smoke, vapors, C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 17 of 25 fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, liquids or gases, waste materials, or other irritants, contaminants or pollutants. If CONTRACTOR provides coverage written on a claims-made basis, OCSD has the right to approve or reject such coverage in its own discretion. If written on a claims- made basis, the CONTRACTOR warrants that any retroactive date applicable to coverage under the policy precedes the effective date of this Contract, and that continuous coverage will be maintained, or an extended discovery period will be exercised, for a period of two years beginning from the time that the Project under this Contract is completed. 7. Limits are Minimums: If CONTRACTOR maintains higher limits than the minimums shown in this Section, OCSD requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the CONTRACTOR. B. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by OCSD. At the option of OCSD, either: the Insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self- insured retentions as respects OCSD, its Directors, officers, agents, CONSULTANTS, and employees; or CONTRACTOR shall provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to OCSD guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses. C. Other Insurance Provisions 1. Each such policy of General Liability Insurance and Automobile Liability Insurance shall be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: a. OCSD, its Directors, officers, agents, CONSULTANTS, and employees, and all public agencies from whom permits will be obtained, and their Directors, officers, agents, and employees are hereby declared to be additional insureds C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 18 of 25 under the terms of this policy, but only with respect to the operations of CONTRACTOR at or from any of the sites of OCSD in connection with this Contract, or acts and omissions of the additional insured in connection with its general supervision or inspection of said operations related to this Contract. b. Insurance afforded by the additional insured endorsement shall apply as primary insurance, and other insurance maintained by OCSD shall be excess only and not contributing with insurance provided under this policy. 2. Each insurance policy required herein shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30)days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, and that coverage shall not be cancelled for non-payment of premium except after ten (10)days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested. Should there be changes in coverage or an increase in deductible or SIR amounts, CONTRACTOR undertakes to procure a manuscript endorsement from its insurer giving 30 days prior notice of such an event to OCSD, or to have its insurance broker/agent send to OCSD a certified letter describing the changes in coverage and any increase in deductible or SIR amounts. The certified letter must be sent Attention: Risk Management and shall be received not less than twenty (20) days prior to the effective date of the change(s). The letter must be signed by a Director or Officer of the broker/agent and must be on company letterhead, and may be sent via e-mail in pdf format. 3. Coverage shall not extend to any indemnity coverage for the active negligence of any additional insured in any case where an agreement to indemnify the additional insured would be invalid under California Civil Code Section 2782(b). 4. If required by a public agency from whom permit(s)will be obtained, each policy of General Liability Insurance and Automobile Liability Insurance shall be endorsed to C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 19 of 25 specify by name the public agency and its legislative members, officers, agents, CONSULTANTS, and employees, to be additional insureds. D. Acceptability of Insurers Insurers must have an "A2, or better, Policyholder's Rating, and a Financial Rating of at least Class Vill, or better, in accordance with the most current A.M. Best Rating Guide. OCSD recognizes that State Compensation Insurance Fund has withdrawn from participation in the A.M. Best Rating Guide process. Nevertheless, OCSD will accept State Compensation Insurance Fund for the required policy of worker's compensation insurance, subject to OCSD's option, at any time during the term of this Contract, to require a change in insurer upon twenty (20)days written notice. Further, OCSD will require CONTRACTOR to substitute any insurer whose rating drops below the levels herein specified. Said substitution shall occur within twenty (20)days of written notice to CONTRACTOR by OCSD or its agent. E. Verification of Coverage CONTRACTOR shall furnish OCSD with original certificates and mandatory endorsements affecting coverage. Said policies and endorsements shall conform to the requirements herein stated. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by OCSD before Work commences. OCSD reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements, affecting the coverage required by these Specifications at any time. F. Subcontractors CONTRACTOR shall be responsible to establish insurance requirements for any Subcontractors hired by CONTRACTOR. The insurance shall be in amounts and types reasonably sufficient to deal with the risk of loss involving the Subcontractor's operations and work. OCSD and any public agency issuing permits for the Project must be named as C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 20 of 25 "Additional Insured"on any General Liability or Automobile Liability policy obtained by a Subcontractor. The CONTRACTOR must obtain copies and maintain current versions of all Subcontractors' policies, Certificate of Liability and mandatory endorsements effecting coverage. Upon request, CONTRACTOR must furnish OCSD with the above referenced required documents. G. Reauired Forms and Endorsements 1. Required ACORD Form a. Certificate of Liability Form 25 2. Reauired Insurance Services Office, Inc. Endorsements (when alternative forms are shown, they are listed in order of preference) In the event any of the following forms are cancelled by Insurance Services Office, Inc. (ISO), or are updated, the ISO replacement form or equivalent must be supplied. a. Commercial General Liability Form CG-0001 10 01 b. Additional Insured Including Form CG-2010 10 01 and Products-Completed Operations Form CG-2037 10 01 C. Waiver of Transfer of Rights of Form CG-2404 11 85; or Recovery Against Others to Us/ Form CG-2404 10 93 Waiver of Subrogation 3. Reauired State Compensation Insurance Fund Endorsements a. Waiver of Subrogation Endorsement No. 2570 b. Cancellation Notice Endorsement No. 2065 4. Additional Required Endorsements a. Notice of Policy Termination Manuscript Endorsement 5. Pollution Liability Endorsements There shall be a Separation of Insured Clause or endorsement, providing that coverage applies separately to each insured, except with respect to the limits of C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 21 of 25 liability. There shall also be an endorsement or policy language containing a waiver of subrogation rights on the part of the insurer. OCSD, its directors, officers, agents, CONSULTANTS and employees and all public agencies from whom permits will be obtained as well as their directors, officers, agents, and employees shall be included as insureds under the policy. Any additional insured endorsement shall contain language at least as broad as the coverage language contained in ISO form CG 20 10 11 85 or alternatively in both CG 20 10 10 01 and CG 20 37 10 01 together. SECTION—17 RISK AND INDEMNIFICATION All Work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR shall save, indemnify, defend, and keep OCSD and others harmless as more specifically set forth in General Conditions, "General Indemnification". SECTION-18 TERMINATION This Contract may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by OCSD in the event of substantial failure by the CONTRACTOR to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, or it may be terminated by OCSD for its convenience provided that such termination is effectuated in a manner and upon such conditions set forth more particularly in General Conditions, "Termination for Default" and/or"Termination for Convenience", provided that no termination may be effected unless proper notice is provided to CONTRACTOR at the time and in the manner provided in said General Conditions. If termination for default or convenience is effected by OCSD, an equitable adjustment in the price provided for in this Contract shall be made at the time and in the manner provided in the General Conditions, "Termination for Default" and "Termination for Convenience". C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 22 of 25 SECTION—19 WARRANTY The CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all Work under this Contract in accordance with the Contract Documents, including OCSD's designs, Drawings and Specifications. The CONTRACTOR guarantees for a period of at least one (1) year from the date of Final Acceptance of the Work, pursuant to the General Conditions, "Final Acceptance and Final Completion' that the completed Work is free from all defects due to faulty materials, equipment or workmanship and that it shall promptly make whatever adjustments or corrections which may be necessary to cure any defects, including repairs of any damage to other parts of the system resulting from such defects. OCSD shall promptly give notice to the CONTRACTOR of observed defects. In the event that the CONTRACTOR fails to make adjustments, repairs, corrections or other work made necessary by such defects, OCSD may do so and charge the CONTRACTOR the cost incurred. The CONTRACTOR's warranty shall continue as to any corrected deficiency until the later of(1)the remainder of the original one-year warranty period; or(2)one year after acceptance by OCSD of the corrected Work. The Performance Bond and the Payment Bond shall remain in full force and effect through the guarantee period. The CONTRACTOR's obligations under this clause are in addition to the CONTRACTOR's other express or implied assurances under this Contract, including but not limited to specific manufacturer or other extended warranties specified in the Plans and Specifications, or state law and in no way diminish any other rights that OCSD may have against the CONTRACTOR for faulty materials, equipment or Work. SECTION-20 ASSIGNMENT No assignment by the CONTRACTOR of this Contract or any part hereof, or of funds to be received hereunder, will be recognized by OCSD unless such assignment has had prior written approval and consent of OCSD and the Surety. C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 23 of 25 SECTION—21 RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES OCSD and the CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of California Public Contract Code Section 20104 at. seq., regarding resolution of construction claims for any Claims which arise between the CONTRACTOR and OCSD, as well as all applicable dispute and Claims provisions as set forth in the General Conditions and as otherwise required by law. SECTION—22 SAFETY & HEALTH CONTRACTOR shall comply with all applicable safety and health requirements mandated by federal, state, city and/or public agency codes, permits, ordinances, regulations, and laws, as well as these Contract Documents, including but not limited to the General Requirements, Section entitled "Safety" and Exhibit B OCSD Safety Standards. SECTION-23 NOTICES Any notice required or permitted under this Contract may be given by ordinary mail at the address set forth below. Any parry whose address changes shall notify the other party in writing. TO OCSD: Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Attn: Clerk of the Board Copy to: Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Attn: Construction Manager Bradley R. Hogin, Esquire Woodruff, Spradlin &Smart 555 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1200 Costa Mesa, California 92626 TO CONTRACTOR: Charles King Company 2841 Gardena Avenue Signal Hill, CA 90755 Copy to: Debra King, President Charles King Company 2841 Gardena Avenue Signal Hill, CA 90755 C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 24 of 25 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Contract Agreement as the date first hereinabove written. CONTRACTOR: Charles King Company 2841 Gardena Avenue Signal Hill, CA 90755 By Printed Name Its CONTRACTOR's State License No. 738236 (Expiration Date 0 713 1/2 01 7) OCSD: Orange County Sanitation District By Chair, Board of Directors By Kelly A. Lore Clerk of the Board By Marc Dubois Contracts, Purchasing and Materials Management Division Manager C-CA-121914 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 25 of 25 EXHIBIT A SCHEDULE OF PRICES C-EXA-080414 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBIT A SCHEDULE OF PRICES EXA-1 BASIS OF COMPENSATION ..............................................................................1 EXA-2 PROGRESS PAYMENTS....................................................................................1 EXA-3 RETENTION AND ESCROW ACCOUNTS .........................................................1 EXA-4 STOP PAYMENT NOTICE ..................................................................................3 EXA-5 PAYMENT TO SUBCONTRACTORS..................................................................3 EXA-6 PAYMENT OF TAXES.........................................................................................3 EXA-7 FINAL PAYMENT ................................................................................................4 EXA-8 DISCOVERY OF DEFICIENCIES BEFORE AND AFTER FINAL PAYMENT.....5 ATTACHMENT 1 CERTIFICATION FOR REQUEST FOR PAYMENT........................7 ATTACHMENT 2 SCHEDULE OF PRICES ...........................................................8 C-EXA-080414 EXHIBIT A SCHEDULE OF PRICES EXA-1 BASIS OF COMPENSATION CONTRACTOR will be paid the Contract Price according to the Schedule of Prices, and all other applicable terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. EXA-2 PROGRESS PAYMENTS Progress payments will be made in accordance with all applicable terms and conditions of the Contract Documents, including, but not limited to: 1. Contract Agreement—Section 11 —"Contract Price and Method of Payment;" 2. General Conditions—"Payment—General"; 3. General Conditions—"Payment—Applications for Payment"; 4. General Conditions—"Payment— Mobilization Payment Requirements;" 5. General Conditions—"Payment— Itemized Breakdown of Contract Lump Sum Prices"; 6. General Conditions—"Contract Price Adjustments and Payments"; 7. General Conditions—"Suspension of Payments"; 8. General Conditions—"OCSD's Right to Withhold Certain Amounts and Make Application Thereof"; and 9. General Conditions—"Final Payment." EXA-3 RETENTION AND ESCROW ACCOUNTS A. Retention: OCSD shall retain a percentage of each progress payment to assure satisfactory completion of the Work. The amount to be retained from each progress payment shall be determined as provided in General Conditions— "Retained Funds; Substitution of Securities". In all contracts between CONTRACTOR and its Subcontractors and/or Suppliers, the retention may not exceed the percentage specified in the Contract Documents. C-EXA-080414 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 1 of 8 B. Substitution of Securities: CONTRACTOR may, at its sole expense, substitute securities as provided in General Conditions—"Retained Funds; Substitution of Securities." Payment of Escrow Agent: In lieu of substitution of securities as provided above, the CONTRACTOR may request and OCSD shall make payment of retention earned directly to the escrow agent at the expense of the CONTRACTOR. At the expense of the CONTRACTOR, the CONTRACTOR may direct the investment of the payments into securities consistent with Government Code §16430 and the CONTRACTOR shall receive the interest earned on the investments upon the same terms provided for in this article for securities deposited by the CONTRACTOR. Upon satisfactory completion of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR shall receive from the escrow agent all securities, interest and payments received by the escrow agent from OCSD, pursuant to the terms of this article. The CONTRACTOR shall pay to each Subcontractor, not later than twenty (20)calendar days after receipt of the payment, the respective amount of interest earned, net of costs attributed to retention withheld from each Subcontractor, on the amount of retention withheld to ensure the performance of the Subcontractor. The escrow agreement used by the escrow agent pursuant to this article shall be substantially similar to the form set forth in §22300 of the California Public Contract Code. C. Release of Retention: Upon Final Acceptance of the Work, the CONTRACTOR shall submit an invoice for release of retention in accordance with the terms of the Contract. D. Additional Deductibles: In addition to the retentions described above, OCSD may deduct from each progress payment any or all of the following: 1. Liquidated Damages that have occurred as of the date of the application for progress payment; 2. Deductions from previous progress payments already paid, due to OCSD's discovery of deficiencies in the Work or non-compliance with the Specifications or any other requirement of the Contract; 3. Sums expended by OCSD in performing any of the CONTRACTOR'S obligations under the Contract that the CONTRACTOR has failed to perform, and; 4. Other sums that OCSD is entitled to recover from the CONTRACTOR under the terms of the Contract, including without limitation insurance deductibles and assessments. C-EXA-080414 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 2 of 8 The failure of OCSD to deduct any of the above-identified sums from a progress payment shall not constitute a waiver of OCSD's right to such sums or to deduct them from a later progress payment. EXA-4 STOP PAYMENT NOTICE In addition to other amounts properly withheld under this article or under other provisions of the Contract, OCSD shall retain from progress payments otherwise due the CONTRACTOR an amount equal to one hundred twenty-five percent (125%)of the amount claimed under any stop payment notice under Civil Code§9350 at. seq. or other lien filed against the CONTRACTOR for labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and any other thing of value claimed to have been furnished to and/or incorporated into the Work; or for any other alleged contribution thereto. In addition to the foregoing and in accordance with Civil Code§9358 OCSD may also satisfy its duty to withhold funds for stop payment notices by refusing to release funds held in escrow pursuant to public receipt of a release of stop payment notice executed by a stop payment notice claimant, a stop payment notice release bond, an order of a court of competent jurisdiction, or other evidence satisfactory to OCSD that the CONTRACTOR has resolved such claim by settlement. EXA-5 PAYMENT TO SUBCONTRACTORS Requirements 1. The CONTRACTOR shall pay all Subcontractors for and on account of Work performed by such Subcontractors, not later than seven (7) days after receipt of each progress payment as required by the California Business and Professions Code §7108.5. Such payments to Subcontractors shall be based on the measurements and estimates made pursuant to article progress payments provided herein. 2. Except as specifically provided by law, the CONTRACTOR shall pay all Subcontractors any and all retention due and owing for and on account of Work performed by such Subcontractors not later than seven (7)days after CONTRACTOR'S receipt of said retention proceeds from OCSD as required by the California Public Contract Code§7107. EXA-6 PAYMENT OF TAXES Unless otherwise specifically provided in this Contract, the Contract Price includes full compensation to the CONTRACTOR for all taxes. The CONTRACTOR shall pay all federal, state, and local taxes, and duties applicable to and assessable against any Work, including but not limited to retail sales and use, transportation, export, import, business, and special taxes. The CONTRACTOR shall ascertain and pay the taxes when due. The CONTRACTOR will maintain auditable records, subject to OCSD reviews, confirming that tax payments are current at all times. C-EXA-080414 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 3 of 8 EXA-7 FINAL PAYMENT After Final Acceptance of the Work, as more particularly set forth in the General Conditions, "Final Acceptance and Final Completion", and after Resolution of the Board authorizing final payment and satisfaction of the requirements as more particularly set forth in General Conditions—"Final Payment", a final payment will be made as follows: 1. Prior to Final Acceptance, the CONTRACTOR shall prepare and submit an application for Final Payment to OCSD, including: a. The proposed total amount due the CONTRACTOR, segregated by items on the payment schedule, amendments, Change Orders, and other bases for payment; b. Deductions for prior progress payments; c. Amounts retained; d. A conditional waiver and release on final payment for each Subcontractor(per Civil Code Section 8136); e. A conditional waiver and release on final payment on behalf of the CONTRACTOR (per Civil Code Section 8136); f. List of Claims the CONTRACTOR intends to file at that time or a statement that no Claims will be filed, g. List of pending unsettled claims, stating claimed amounts, and copies of any and all complaints and/or demands for arbitration received by the CONTRACTOR; and h. For each and every claim that resulted in litigation or arbitration which the CONTRACTOR has settled, a conformed copy of the Request for Dismissal with prejudice or other satisfactory evidence the arbitration is resolved. 2. The application for Final Payment shall include complete and legally effective releases or waivers of liens and stop payment notices satisfactory to OCSD, arising out of or fled in connection with the Work. Prior progress payments shall be subject to correction in OCSD's review of the application for Final Payment. Claims filed with the application for Final Payment must be otherwise timely under the Contract and applicable law. 3. Within a reasonable time, OCSD will review the CONTRACTOR'S application for Final Payment. Any recommended changes or corrections will then be forwarded to the CONTRACTOR. Within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of recommended changes from OCSD, the CONTRACTOR will make the changes, or list Claims that will be filed as a result of the changes, and shall submit the revised application for Final Payment. Upon C-EXA-080414 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 4 of 8 acceptance by OCSD, the revised application for Final Payment will become the approved application for Final Payment. 4. If no Claims have been fled with the initial or any revised application for Final Payment, and no Claims remain unsettled within thirty-five (35) calendar days after Final Acceptance of the Work by OCSD, and agreements are reached on all issues regarding the application for Final Payment, OCSD, in exchange for an executed release, satisfactory in form and substance to OCSD, will pay the entire sum found due on the approved application for Final Payment, including the amount, if any, allowed on settled Claims. 5. The release from the CONTRACTOR shall be from any and all Claims arising under the Contract, except for Claims that with the concurrence of OCSD are specifically reserved, and shall release and waive all unreserved Claims against OCSD and its officers, directors, employees and authorized representatives. The release shall be accompanied by a certification by the CONTRACTOR that: a. It has resolved all Subcontractors, Suppliers and other Claims that are related to the settled Claims included in the Final Payment; b. It has no reason to believe that any party has a valid claim against the CONTRACTOR or OCSD which has not been communicated in writing by the CONTRACTOR to OCSD as of the date of the certificate; c. All warranties are in full force and effect, and; d. The releases and the warranties shall survive Final Payment. 6. If any claims remain open, OCSD may make Final Payment subject to resolution of those claims. OCSD may withhold from the Final Payment an amount not to exceed one hundred fifty percent (150%)of the sum of the amounts of the open claims, and one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the amounts of open stop payment notices referred to in article entitled stop payment notices herein. 7. The CONTRACTOR shall provide an unconditional waiver and release on final payment from each Subcontractor and Supplier providing Work under the Contract(per Civil Code Section 8138) and an unconditional waiver and release on final payment on behalf of the CONTRACTOR (per Civil Code Section 8138)within thirty (30)days of receipt of Final Payment. EXA-8 DISCOVERY OF DEFICIENCIES BEFORE AND AFTER FINAL PAYMENT Notwithstanding OCSD's acceptance of the application for Final Payment and irrespective of whether it is before or after Final Payment has been made, OCSD shall not be precluded from subsequently showing that: 1. The true and correct amount payable for the Work is different from that previously accepted; C-EXA-080414 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 5 of 8 2. The previously-accepted Work did not in fact conform to the Contract requirements, or; 3. A previous payment or portion thereof for Work was improperly made. OCSD also shall not be stopped from demanding and recovering damages from the CONTRACTOR, as appropriate, under any of the foregoing circumstances as permitted under the Contract or applicable law. C-EXA-080414 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 6 of 8 ATTACHMENTI CERTIFICATION FOR REQUEST FOR PAYMENT I hereby certify under penalty of perjury as follows: That the claim for payment is in all respects true, correct; that the services mentioned herein were actually rendered and/or supplies delivered to OCSD in accordance with the Contract. I understand that it is a violation of both the federal and California False Claims Acts to knowingly present or cause to be presented to OCSD a false claim for payment or approval. A claim includes a demand or request for money. It is also a violation of the False Claims Acts to knowingly make use of a false record or statement to get a false claim paid. The term "knowingly" includes either actual knowledge of the information, deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information, or reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of the information. Proof of specific intent to defraud is not necessary under the False Claims Acts. I understand that the penalties under the Federal False Claims Act and State of California False Claims Act are non-exclusive, and are in addition to any other remedies which OCSD may have either under contract or law. I hereby further certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. The amounts requested are only for performance in accordance with the Specifications, terms, and conditions of the Contract; 2. Payments to Subcontractors and Suppliers have been made from previous payments received under the Contract, and timely payments will be made from the proceeds of the payment covered by this certification; 3. This request for progress payments does not include any amounts which the prime CONTRACTOR intends to withhold or retain from a Subcontractor or Supplier in accordance with the terms and conditions of the subcontract; and 4. This certification is not to be construed as Final Acceptance of a Subcontractor's performance. Name Title Date C-EXA-080414 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 7 of 8 ATTACHMENT SCHEDULE OF PRICES See next pages for Bid Submittal Forms (Charles King Company): BF-14 Schedule of Prices, Page 1 - 3 C-EXA-080414 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF CONFORMED Page 8 of 8 Bid Submitted B : Charles y Cha s King Company (Name of Firm) BF-14 SCHEDULE OF PRICES INSTRUCTIONS A. General For Unit Prices, it is understood that the following quantities are approximate only and are solely for the purpose of estimating the comparison of Bids, and that the actual value of Work will be computed based upon the actual quantities in the completed Work,whether they be more or less than those shown. CONTRACTOR's compensation for the Work under the Contract Documents will be computed based upon the lump sum amount of the Contract at time of award, plus any additional or deleted costs approved by OCSD via approved Change Orders, pursuant to the Contract Documents. Bidder shall separately price and accurately reflect costs associated with each line item, leaving no blanks. Any and all modifications to the Bid must be initialed by an authorized representative of the Bidder in accordance with the Instructions to Bidders.Preparation of Bid. Bidders are reminded of Instruction to Bidders, Discrepancy in Bid Items,which, in summary, provides that the total price for each Rem shall be based on the Unit Price listed for each item multiplied by the quantity; and the correct Total Price for each item shall be totaled to determine the Total Amount of Bid. All applicable costs including overhead and profit shall be reflected in the respective unit costs and the TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID. The Bid price shall include all costs to complete the Work, including profit,overhead,etc., unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents. All applicable sales taxes,state and/or federal.and any other special taxes. Patent rights or royalties shall be included in the prices quoted in this Bid. B. Basis of Award AWARD OF THE CONTRACT WILL BE MADE ON THE BASIS OF THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE AND RESPONSIBLE BID. THE LOWEST BID IS DEFINED AS THE"TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID" LISTED IN THIS BID, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BELOW. Note 1: Base Bid. Includes all costs necessary to furnish all labor, materials, equipment and services for the construction of the Project per the Contract Documents. i' BF-14 SCHEDULE OF PRICES C-BF-021115 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 5 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF ADDENDUM NO.2 Page 1 of 3 Bid Submitted By: Charles King Company (Name of Firm) EXHIBIT A SCHEDULE OF PRICES BASE BID ITEMS (Refer to Note 1 in the Instructions): Item Na. Description Unitoll Measurement it Extended Price 1. Mobilization:The amount forthis bid item shall not exceed 4%of the TotalAmount of Bid as described in Division 01, Section 01155 and in Lump Sum $ conformance with the Contract Documents for the lump sum price of... w2. Sheeting,Shoring&Bracing: Designing, furnishing, erecting, maintaining and removal of sheeting,shoring and bracing and other equivalent methods as described in Division 01, Section 01155 and in conformance with the Lump Sum $ Contract Documents for the lump sum price of.. 3. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan: Prepare and Implement Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan as described in Division 01, Section Lump Sum = $ 01155 and in conformance with the Contract Documents for the lump sum price of... 4. Completion of Work: This Rem includes labor, materials and equipment necessary for the all portions of the Work set forth in the Contrail Documents except for the Work performed in Items 1 through 3 inclusive, Lump Sum and Items 5 through 7 inclusive, as described in Division 01, Section 01155 and in conformance with the Contract Documents for a lump sum Price of... BF-14 SCHEDULE OF PRICES C-BF-021115 PROJECT NO.6-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF ADDENDUM NO.2 Page 2 of 3 Bid Submitted By: Charles King Comuanv (Name of Firm) EXHIBIT A SCHEDULE OF PRICES (continued) Item No. Description Meanitof nl Appnx Unit Price Extended Price 5. Boulder removal: Excavation and removal of boulders within the excavation limits larger than one 1000 pounds as defined in Division 01, Section 01155 and in conformance with the Contract Documents for the Tonp7 per ton unit price and total price of... 6. Permits,Inspection and Lease Fees: as necessary for the completion of the Contract Work as described in Division 01, Section 01155 and in Allowance = $ 250,000.00 conformance with the Contract Documents for the allowance of... 7. Demobilization:The amount for this bid item shall not be less than 1%of 9� V�the Total Amount of Bid as described in Division 01, Section 01155 and in Lump Sum = $ conformance with the Contract Documents for the lump sum price of... � == i TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID (BASIS OF AWARD) $ 3,O BF-04 SCHEDULE OF PRICES C-BF-021115 PROJECT NO.5-17 DISTRICT 6 TRUNK SEWER RELIEF ADDENDUM NO.2 Page 3 of 3