Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout98.05-24-2017 Board Meeting ONLINE Agenda Item 16 Attachments.pdf Orange County Sanitation District Blosolids Management Compliance Report Year 2016 EPA 40 CFR Part 503 i raq�R R fir; .' oN � �,• �P 0 F r �\ F TABLE OF CONTENTS 2016 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE REPORT Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 Organization and Function .....................................................................................................1 Treatment Plants and Program Updates................................................................................1 BiosolidsManagement...........................................................................................................3 Summaryof Pollutants ...........................................................................................................5 Determination of Hazardousness...........................................................................................6 Biosolids Management System ..............................................................................................6 Goalsand Targets..................................................................................................................7 BiosolidsProgram Policy........................................................................................................7 APPENDIX A Table 1: OCSD Biosolids Monitoring and Reporting for 2016, Plant No.1 Table 2: OCSD Biosolids Monitoring and Reporting for 2016, Plant No. 2 Notice and Necessary Information Certification Forms, January— December 2016 APPENDIX B OCSD's Pretreatment Program Annual Report FY 2015-2016 Solids Management Program, Chapter 9 APPENDIX C Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Analysis for Biosolids APPENDIX D Arizona Biosolids Annual Report Form for Reporting Year 2016 APPENDIX E Biosolids Program History APPENDIX F EPA Biosolids Annual Report Electronic Form for Reporting Year 2016, Plant No. 1 EPA Biosolids Annual Report Electronic Form for Reporting Year 2016, Plant No. 2 2016 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE REPORT Introduction Organization and Function Treatment Plants and Program Updates Biosolids Management Summary of Pollutants Determination of Hazardousness Biosolids Management System Goals and Targets Biosolids Program Policy Introduction The Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) Biosolids Program is responsible for the treatment and management of OCSD's biosolids. OCSD recognizes the importance of building strong relationships throughout its biosolids value chain, including with interested parties and regulators. OCSD practices continuous improvement in all areas of its Biosolids Program through our internal biosolids management system. The following sections summarize OCSD's activities and performance for the compliance-reporting period of January 1 to December 31, 2016. Organization and Function OCSD is a public agency that provides wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services for approximately 2.5 million people in central and northwest Orange County. OCSD is a special district that is governed by a Board of Directors consisting of 25 board members appointed from 20 cities, two sanitary districts, two water districts and one representative from the Orange County Board of Supervisors. OCSD has two operating facilities (Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach)that treat wastewater from residential, commercial and industrial sources. Operating under National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. CA0110604, OCSD treated an average daily sewage influent flow of 182 million gallons per day (MGD), five percent less than the previous year. OCSD produced approximately 293,891 wet tons of biosolids (54,027 dry metric tons), which equates to an average of 805 wet tons per day of biosolids, including digester cleanings managed as biosolids. Typical biosolids production, excluding digester cleanings, averaged 780 tons per day. Treatment Plants and Program Updates Reclamation Plant No. 1, located in the city of Fountain Valley, treated an average of 116 MGD of wastewater. Treatment Plant No. 2, located in the City of Huntington Beach, treated an average of 66 MGD of wastewater during the reporting period. Notable changes and accomplishments for this year include: • Plant No. 1's primary clarifiers 3-5 reached the end of their asset life and were removed from service. OCSD's Engineering Department is in the early stages of planning the replacement of these clarifiers. • Plant No. 1 digesters 12 and 14 were cleaned. The rehabilitation capital improvement program project completed the cleaning portion of the project. Rehabilitation is anticipated to be complete in 2017. Plant No. 1 digester cleanings will be managed through routine maintenance contracts in the future. • The rehabilitation of Plant No. 2 dissolved air flotation tanks (DAFTs)was completed. These DAFTs create thickened secondary sludges to feed the digesters. • Plant No. 2 digesters H and E were cleaned. 1 • The local limits ordinance for OCSD's pretreatment program was updated to include molybdenum and selenium, which will further enhance OCSD's biosolids quality. In 2015, about 20 MGD of influent sewage was diverted to Plant No. 1 from Plant No. 2 to support the Orange County Water District's (OCWD) Ground Water Replenishment System (GWRS) expansion. GWRS purifies OCSD's secondary treated water from Plant No. 1 to meet drinking water standards. Last year, OCSD provided GWRS an average of 121 MGD of secondary effluent to produce purified water for reuse. During this reporting period, Reclamation Plant No. 1 produced 24,388 dry metric tons of biosolids, including 2,516 dry metric tons of digester cleanings (from digesters 12 and 14). These biosolids were anaerobically digested for an average of 18 days at 37 degrees Celsius (98 degrees Fahrenheit) resulting in an average volatile solids reduction of 60 percent over this reporting period with an average total solids of 18%. Under the established operational parameters, Plant No. 1 diverted a daily average of 58,154 cubic feet or 0.44 MGD of primary sludge from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2 via our inter-plant sludge line, along with about 2.05 MGD of Plant No. 1 biosolids belt-press dewatering filtrate. Treatment Plant No. 2 produced 29,534 dry metric tons of biosolids, including 1,250 dry metric tons of digester cleanings (from digesters H and E). The process at Plant No. 2 is similar to Plant No. 1 in that the biosolids were anaerobically digested for an average of 21 days at 37 degrees Celsius (98 degrees Fahrenheit). Biosolids from Plant No. 2 had an average volatile solids reduction of 62 percent and an average total solids of 21%. This year's solids production increased by 2% versus the previous year(763 average tons per day in 2015 and 780 tons per day in 2016) in part because 56% more primary sludge was diverted from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2 due to limited digestion capacity at Plant No. 1 and in support of the GWRS expansion. Plants Nos. 1 and 2 processes provide compliance with the "Class B Pathogen Reduction" and "Vector Attraction Reduction" definition for"Class B" biosolids as defined in 40 CFR Part 503.32(b)(3) (PSRP 3) and 503.33(b)(1), respectively. In addition, Tule Ranch/AgTech's standard operating procedure includes incorporation within 6 hours which meets 40 CFR Part 503.33(b)(10) requirement if OCSD's treatment plant fails to meet the Vector Attraction Reduction standard. 2 Biosolids Production History 9 '000 No aoo.000 : 0 o x x, _�_ 700 z 000 X X 600 y X 3 M0.000 w x' S00 m150Aoo 400 p 00 B im 00 LC �P1-welfene �—P3-xvlbna p0 y�pp0 �Tohl P16 P2 ,A �u �p ,p �0 �9 --r-Teroper0ey 100 C Iendar Year Figure 1: Biosolids Production History from January 1992— December 2016 The Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) discharges its untreated solids (sludge) to OCSD. IRWD is currently constructing their own solids treatment facility and plans to cease sending their solids to OCSD by December 2017. This cessation is anticipated to reduce Plant No. 1's influent solids by ten to fifteen percent. OCSD is replacing the belt filter presses with new dewatering centrifuge facilities, which are scheduled to start service in 2018 for Plant No. 1 and by 2020 for Plant No. 2. As a result, the total percent solids of digested biosolids is anticipated to increase from 18% (Plant No. 1) and 22% (Plant No. 2)to 28-30%, resulting in approximately one-third fewer wet-weight solids to manage. In addition, this project is also bringing pre-digestion thickening centrifuges to replace the dissolved air Floatation thickening at Plant No. 1, and it is rehabilitating the Plant No. 1 truck loading facility. Biosolids Management Biosolids produced at OCSD's two treatment facilities were managed by the contractors listed below in Table 1. In 2016, OCSD started managing its biosolids at two new composting facilities. A two- step request for qualifications-bid process was completed and two new composting contractors, Nursery Products and Liberty Compost, were awarded the contracts in 3 November 2016. Soon after the contract was awarded to Nursery Products, Synagro purchased Nursery Products. The contractors started hauling OCSD biosolids in December 2016. Table 1- Biosolids Management Contractors Tule Ranch /Ag-Tech 4324 E. Ashlan Ave. Fresno, CA 93726 Contact: Shaen Magan Phone: (559) 970-9432 Email: kurt@westexp.com Synagro— South Kern Compost Manufacturing Facility P.O. Box 265 Taft, CA 93268 Contact: Chad Buechel Phone: (661) 765-2200 x223 Email: cbuechel@SYNAGRO.com Synagro— Arizona Soils 5615 S. 91 st Avenue Tolleson, AZ 85353 Contact: Craig Geyer Phone: (623) 936-6328 Email: CGeyer@SYNAGRO.com Synagro - Nursery Products PO Box1439 Helendale, CA 92342 Contact: Chad Buechel Phone: (661) 378-2515 Email: cbuechel@SYNAGRO.com Inland Empire Regional Composting Authority 12645 6th Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Contact: Jeff Ziegenbein Phone: (909) 993-1981 Email:jzlegenbein@leua.org Orange County Waste and Recycling Prima Deshecha Landfill 32250 La Pata Ave. San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Contact: Greg Dayak, Landfill Operations Superintendent Phone: (949) 728-3050 Email: Greg.Da ak ocwr.oc ov.com Liberty Compost 12421 Holloway Rd. Lost Hills, CA 93249 Contact: Patrick McCarthy Phone: (661) 797-2914 Email: patrickmccarLhy@mccarthyfarms.com 4 These biosolids management contractors provide OCSD with diversification and reliability and are therefore important partners in OCSD's biosolids management program. Contractors submit their annual compliance reports directly to EPA, as applicable and in accordance with OCSD's NPDES permit requirements. For this reporting period, OCSD's biosolids were beneficially reused in the following areas: Beneficial Amount of Biosolitls Reuse Biosolitls Contractor Managed Destination Method or and Site Name (dry metric tons) Product Plant No. 1 Plant No. 2 Class B land Tule Ranch Yuma County,AZ application A Tech and Desert Ride 718 26,183 Synagro Kam County,CA Compost South Kam Compost Manufacturing Facility 12,867 1,168 Synagro La Paz County,AZ Compost Arizona Soils 6,077 0 San Bernardino Synagro County,CA Compost Nursery Products 751 29 Liberty Compost Kern County,CA Compost Liberty Compost 147 0 Inland Empire Regional Composting San Bernardino Authority County,CA Compost Inland Empire Regional Composting Facility 50 905 Orange County Waste&Recycling Orange County,CA Landfill Prima Deshecha Landfill 1,260 0 Digester Cleaning Totals Synagro La Paz County,AZ Compost Arizona Soils 2,516 1,215 San Bernardino Synagro County,CA Compost Nursery Products 0 35 24,388 29,534 Land Compost Application Landfill Total 53922 49% 48% 3% Summary of Pollutants Since 1976, OCSD's Pretreatment Program has been effective in lowering the average mass of metals discharged to the marine environment by 98% and the total mass of metals in the influent sewage by 86%, thereby ensuring OCSD's biosolids can be recycled to farm fields with low metals concentrations. Furthermore, OCSD's influent wastewater meets drinking water standards for metals. Appendix B contains the biosolids chapter of OCSD's Pretreatment Program Annual Report (ocsd.com/SCAnnual (part 2, Chapter 9)). Tables 1 through 3 in the compliance data section (Appendix A) compare the concentration limits of the pollutants listed in 40 CFR 503 to OCSD's average biosolids concentrations for each plant. The average concentrations of all pollutants in OCSD's biosolids are below the conservative Table-1 Ceiling Limits and Table 3 Exceptional Quality Limits found in 40 CFR Part 503. 5 In accordance with OCSD's NPDES permit, biosolids are also tested semi-annually for all pollutants listed under Section 307(a) of the Clean Water Act. Appendix C contains the summary of the priority pollutants analyzed in the plants' biosolids. Determination of Hazardousness Legal Definition OCSD's 2012 Ocean Discharge NPDES permit requires OCSD to test its biosolids annually for hazardousness in accordance with 40 CFR Part 261. Hazardous waste is also defined under the provisions of California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Chapter 11, Article 5. Determination OCSD's biosolids are tested at least annually for the determination of hazardousness. OCSD's produces biosolids with pollutant concentrations below the limits as referenced above. See OCSD's biosolids monitoring data in Appendix C, Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Analysis. As a result of this determination, OCSD's biosolids are non-hazardous. Biosolids Management System OCSD continues to utilize its biosolids management system to effectively administer its biosolids program. One example of OCSD's continued commitment to our biosolids management system is our continued transparent communications. Three interested party newsletters were emailed and posted on OCSD's website, and OCSD continues to post the monthly regulatory data online. OCSD shared timely updates on our Biosolids Master Plan and the compost contract opportunity with our interested stakeholders and online throughout the year. OCSD has also continued our strong contractor oversight program, including tracking and resolving 15 contractor issues and performing 11 contractor site inspections and 61 hauler inspections. 6 Goals and Targets OCSD's November 2013 Strategic Plan contained numerous agency-wide goals and levels of service targets. The December 2015 Plan update provided progress to date, including the completion of two of the six strategic goals. One goal, "Future Biosolids Management Options," is expected to be completed in 2017 as part of OCSD's Biosolids Master Plan. See www.ocsd.com/5vearstrategici)lan)for more information. Biosolids Program Policy Originally adopted in 1999 and amended in 2006 and 2013, OCSD's Resolution 13-03 (www.ocsd.com/policv) established a policy that commits the agency to support biosolids beneficial reuse (organics recycling). The resolution's commitments and OCSD's performance relative to these commitments are reported below. A similar discussion is included in the 2017 Biosolids Master Plan. Table 3— Policy Performance Policy Commitment 2016 Performance Commit to sustainable OCSD has demonstrated effective pretreatment, water biosolids program. and solids treatment operations, compliance, capital improvements, technology research and planning, and Support the recycling of biosolids contractor oversight programs. biosolids. This year's accomplishments include: • Recycling of 97% of OCSD's biosolids; • OCSD started worked through a consulting contract to help us develop a comprehensive Biosolids Master Plan that will provide a long- term framework for a sustainable, cost- effective biosolids management program. The Plan is expected to be complete in early 2017. • Quarterly research meetings with sister agencies to evaluate new technologies that could be considered by OCSD. Strive to balance financial, On a day-to-day basis, OCSD is weighing these environmental, and societal considerations and looking out for issues that would considerations when making alter the balance. For instance, allocating our biosolids biosolids decisions. to our diverse locations considers this "triple bottom line." The November 2016 compost service contract award will reduce composting costs up to $27 per ton, while maintaining our high contractor performance and oversight standards. Utilize a biosolids OCSD continues to maintain our biosolids management system to management system. maintain a sustainable and 7 publicly supported biosolids See the Biosolids Management System section above program. and the History Appendix (Appendix E). Diversify portfolio of offsite See Table 2 for breakdown of our active biosolids biosolids management management options. OCSD maintained more than options with multiple 10 times (1000%) of our daily biosolids production in biosolids contractors, failsafe facility capacity. OCSD also maintained about markets, facilities, and 25% extra hauling capacity. maintaining fail-safe back-up capacity of at least 100% of its daily biosolids production. Research and implement OCSD's Research group actively seeks opportunities ways to reduce the volume for process area improvements, including solids. of biosolids at the treatment plants to minimize the need Supercritical Water Oxidation —OCSD's Board of for offsite management. Directors approved a vendor to determine the feasibility of this technology (www.scfi.eu). As mentioned in the "Treatment Plants and Program Updates" section above, OCSD's production of biosolids is anticipated to drop by about one-third once the dewatering centrifuges come online in the next few years. OCSD awarded a professional engineering services contract for developing a new Biosolids Master Plan. The Biosolids Master Plan will include evaluation and design of capital facilities, which may result in a reduced amount of biosolids hauled offsite. Support continuing research OCSD continued to be part of the Northwest Biosolids of biosolids benefits and library (www.nwbiosolids.org). The library contains potential safety concerns. references to over 2,600 biosolids-related research articles references. Northwest Biosolids sends a monthly summary of research to its members, which OCSD shares internally in our monthly biosolids report. NBMA also has a free monthly e-Bulletin for non-members. In 2015, based on extensive research, the Northwest Biosolids association published a Public-friendly risk brochure explaining how long it takes for workers and other "exposed populations" to to build up a dose-equivalent pharmaceuticals or personal care products from exposure to biosolids (most in the thousands to hundred-thousands of years). Demonstrate the benefits of OCSD maintains compost piles at each plant. This biosolids compost by using it compost is available to our employees and landscape at the District's facilities. contractor to demonstrate the benefits of compost. 8 OCSD encourage employees to share their compost use photos. OCSD is establishing a compost demonstration area beside the final effluent sampling building as part of the landscaping part of the building's rehabilitation project. 9 APPENDIX A Table 1: OCSD Biosolids Monitoring and Reporting for 2016, Plant No. 1 Table 2: OCSD Biosolids Monitoring and Reporting for 2016, Plant No. 2 Notice and Necessary Information Certification Forms, January — December 2016 Table 1 - OCSD Biosolids Monitoring and Reporting for 2016 40 CFR 503 Analyses Reclamation Plant No. 1, Fountain Valley, CA 40 CFR 503 Criteria CorVtyant Dry Wabht(mgft) Constituent(mglKg)Dry Annual Mean Ceiling Monthly Average Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec (Tebk 1) (Table 3) Arsenic av 6.3 6.4 8.3 7.0 63 12 8.0 6.7 76 6.7 7.6 ].] 7.6 75 41 Arsenic gral 6.7 6.7 11 7.3 7.6 12 8.6 7.0 8.6 6.8 7.6 8.2 Cadmlunn av 1.6 12.3 2.4 1.3 1.3 2.7 3.1 2.6 3.6 6.1 6.0 4.2 3.2 85 39 Cadmium max 1.8 2.3 2.9 1.5 1.3 2.7 3.4 2.9 4.0 6.8 7.6 8.2 Chmmium jary 32 31 72 89 47 40 46 30 38 40 34 35 45 3000 NIA Co r av 390 440 450 480 410 450 490 400 520 490 410 420 450 4300 16N Coipper mal 450 520 490 480 410 480 540 410 MO 520 "a 420 Leatl av <11 123 <11 14 112 <25 <12 113 <13 11 14 <12 13 840 300 Last dirl 11 123 12 14 112 125 112 03 12 12 17 <25 Memu w 0.62 0.87 0.60 0.64 1.] 1.3 0.82 0.53 0.94 0.87 0.82 1.0 0.99 57 iT Maroury 0.70 1.0 0.61 gas 1.9 1.5 Dw ow 0.96 0.95 0.95 1.3 Molybdenum av 12 11 12 15 13 15 16 12 21 16 15 14 14 75 NIA Molybdenum 14 13 13 15 13 16 17 12 25 17 16 14 Nickel av 44 11 31 36 34 43 39 25 37 30 27 1 27 1 34 420 420 Nickel max 55 31 36 36 34 46 43 25 37 33 29 27 Selenium(ei 9.7 9.8 91 10 4.4 9.3 8.0 9.3 6.8 8.1 8.6 5.4 8.4 100 100 Selenium maz 10 14 9.7 11 5.1 12 8.2 12 12 9.9 11 fi.] Zinc av 540 500 560 fi40 540 630 670 550 ]00 6]0 fi00 fi10 600 7500 2800 Zinc max 620 570 64 640 550 670 710 560 ]50 ]10 630 610 Organic Nitrogen(avg) 53,000 591D90 61,000 49000 45,000 56,000 54,000 55,000 56000 51,000 50,000 55,000 451000 No limit Ammonia Nitrogen avg) 6200 6000 fi200 6fi00 6400 6200 fi400 6300 6fi00 6200 fi600 fi500 6300 No limit Process Assessment' 8 Ogen on vet or UC ion Requirements("lase B,Op 1) Dili Detention Time(days) 18 17 17 20 19 1] 17 1] 1] 1] 1] iT 18 15 dayminimum Digester Temperature °F B] 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 95-131 T Di ester Temperature °L 36 w 36 37 37 1 37 1 37 37 1 37 1 37 3] 37 37 35-55°C Volatile Solids Reddidion 14 62 63 61 59 58 54 fie bit62 62 62 60 50 38%minimum Biasolitls Total Solitls %) 18 18 18 18 1 17 1 17 1 17 1 16 1 17 1 19 18 17 10 NIA Quantity Gana2ta4 Jan FieldMar Apol May June July Aug Bap Oct Nw pap Total Total BIOSOIIrIS Managed Byrugro CA-cmnposdwetwns) 7,760 ],35] ],6]8 ],5]6 ],194 6,889 ],131 ],308 6,]23 5,612 6,]28 3,081 81,037 Synag ro CA-composrytlry mewc was 1267 1201 1253 1,237 11W 1062 1100 1061 1037 967 1098 475 12887 Synagro AZ-oompodovetwns) 3,886 3,672 3,760 3,535 3,735 3,171 2,824 3,306 2,983 2,400 2,542 2,488 38,303 Byrwg ro AZ-wmpaal(dry meNc tone) 634 No 614 5T] 576 489 435 480 460 414 415 384 6,017 WET TONS 143,714 Inland Empire Regional Composting Iwenons) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 274 324 Inland Empire Regional CampwOng tl,y metric was 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 42 50 Tula RancM1 AZ-land applicatlon (wet tons) 9 6 11,479 1,260 0 0 3]4 0 0 0 0 402 0 4,421 Tula Roder AZ-hadaapplication by mend tans) US .1 206 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 fi6 0 718 Quantity Generated Jan I'a6 Mar April may tlana Julyau9 Sep an xbv oec Total Total Biosolids Managed ocwx CH LaMdll(wet tons) 0 0 0 0 0 764 1,623 11185 1,461 1,554 1,203 200 7,991 OCWR CH LarvMli(tlN metric tons) 0 0 0 0 0 118 250 172 225 268 196 31 1,280 )megm-Nu r,Psodues, ..'et(wel tons) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,873 4,873 F 9ro- ueeN ro eompost(dN mains lone) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 751 751 Liberty Cwnpost CA(,vet tons) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 955 955 arty wnpost IaN mao-m tons) 0 D o D 0 0 o D o 0 o 147 147 DRY Tpml Wet Tons 12,551 12,508 1 12,698 1 11,111 10,929 11,199 11,5]8 11,800 11,16] 9,566 10,925 11,873 137,904 METRIC 24,493 Total Dry Metric Tons TONS 2,049 2,062 2,O73 1,814 1,fi85 1,127 1,T85 1,712 i,T22 1,fi48 1,T84 1,B91 21,BT2 Digester Cleanings Oi9 4 Dig 12 Dig 12 Dig 12 Dig 14 Dig 14 Dig A Tolsl Salitla(%) 4547 synagm,AZ compost wettons 0 0 0 0 256 988 791 T]] 0 1050 1468 480 5,810 S a m,AZ it metris tans 0 0 0 0 105 484 395 345 0 395 694 2W 2,830 Table 2 - OCSD Biosolids Monitoring and Reporting for 2016 40 CFR 503 Analyses Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2, Huntington Beach, CA 40 CFR 503 Criteria Constituent Dry Weight(mg/Kg) Annual Mean Ceiling MonNly Average Lonatituen[ImglKgl Dry Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sep Oct May Dec (Tab)e 1) (Table 3) Arsenic av 6.8 8.5 0.7 8.8 7.5 10 ].5 5.fi 6.7 7.2 6.4 6.3 7.5 75 41 A.enic max 6.8 9.5 10 9.1 8.1 11 6.3 5.7 7.2 7.8 6.4 6.6 Cadmium av 2.3 2.9 3.1 2.2 2.0 3.1 3.5 3.6 4.5 6.1 6.7 5.2 3.8 85 39 Cadmium(me,) 2.5 3.3 3.4 2A 2.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 5.1 9.1 7.6 5.3 Chromium(ay,,) 34 34 W 55 44 47 44 40 43 39 39 40 43 3000 NIA Copper 410 450 490 520 460 460 510 480 510 490 530 490 480 4300 1500 C r r(max 450 500 510 550 470 470 550 480 520 490 570 420 Lead av 9.7 <18 12 15 11 <20 <10 12 14 13 15 13 13 840 300 Lead max 11 <18 12 15 11 Q0 <10 12 14 13 15 14 Memo a 0.65 IA 0.85 091 0.94 12 0.94 032 1.2 0.52 0.88 0.82 0.89 57 17 Memu vmax 0.70 1.2 1.0 1.2 0.94 1.3 1.0 0.74 1.2 0.92 0.89 0.82 Md 11 13 14 16 15 16 1] 15 17 16 15 15 15 75 NIA Mo 12 14 14 16 15 16 10 15 10 16 16 16 Nickel a en 41 31 33 31 29 32 30 30 35 30 32 27 32 420 420 Nickel max 49 33 33 31 30 32 31 30 35 30 36 28 Seenium by 9.4 T6 8.4 10 5.5 88 7.8 67 8.3 6.9 6.0 3.8 1 7A 100 100 Selenium max 11 12 8.9 11 6.2 10 0.0 8.4 1.4 fi.9 8.5 4.6 Zinc av 620 640 730 760 700 720 790 730 750 740 760 760 710 7500 2800 Zinc max 680 710 740 790 700 740 840 730 790 740 830 820 Organic Nitrogen(avg) "'moo 45,000 45,000 44,000 41,000 44,000 52,000 50,000 45,000 45,000 42,000 41,000 39,000 No limit Ammonia Nitrogen hom) b.. 6200 5,300 5,500 6100 5,200 5,100 4,700 6100 51300 5,100 7,800 5200 1 No limit Process Assessment' ogen and ve tter minkintem requirements(Class B.Option 1) Digester Detention Time(dai 20 20 20 20 21 24 22 21 21 20 21 20 21 15 dayminimum Di ester Tem home -F 96 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 96 98 95-131'Fm Di ester Tem ralure °C 36 1 36 1 37 1 37 1 37 1 37 1 37 1 37 1 ] 1 37 1 37 35-55°C Vdind.Solid.Reduction % e, 1 60 1 62 1 59 1 63 1 62 1 59 1 60 1 59 1 68 1 65 62 fit 38%minimum BIosdiES Total Solitls(%) zt 1 22 1 zt 1 21 1 21 1 21 1 20 1 21 1 21 1 21 1 21 1 21 21 NIA Quantity Generated Total Total Biosolids Managed Jan Feb J2.U April May June July Aug Sep Oct N. Dee Syoagm CA-compoal(weuons) 0 0 51 680 553 554 505 833 1,819 984 25 6,154 5 mCA-composttl mehic to 0 0 10 129 105 100 96 159 347 187 5 1,168 S mAZ-com no(eelwna 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Synal P2-compeat(try metre tore) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Imam Empire Raptional Cpm4mhg WETTONS 150,177 Dolt-a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 619 1,065 1,045 1,000 1,022 4,750 Hand!Empire Regional Comp a ig (dry metric tons) 0 0 0 0 0 0 118 203 199 190 195 905 Tub Rai PZ-lam application hear 11,460 10199 11702 12,243 11810 11,209 11,961 10,826 10388 10325 12545 136,407 Tule Ratch PZ-IeN apoiicatim (dry metric tons) 2.2. 2,035 2,229 2,332 2,249 2,033 2,278 2,062 1,979 1,967 2,389 26,183 OCWR CA Landfill(wet tors) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Quantity Generated Total Total Biosolids Managed Jan Feb Mar April May Juna July Aug Sep Oct Nov, Dec OCWR CA Landfill(tlry metris lure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ymagrp- wars uc wmpmt(rud tons) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 151 151 Ta9ra- weir ormpost(dry melds tom) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 29 LibeM Compost CA(.turn) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n mpo rym tnm) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Wet Tons 11468 10,199 11,883 11,752 12,923 12,362 11,763 13,085 12,]23 13,252 12,309 13,743 28,285 Total Dry Mom Tom 2,288 2,035 2,371 2238 2,482 2,355 2,134 2,492 2,423 2,524 2,344 2,818 147,462 DRY METRIC Z8�534 Digester Cleanings Total TONS DISH DISH DISH Dig Dig E Total SoliCat%) 47 4] 58 AZ Soils lCompost)(yet land) 0 0 0 0 68 1334 38] 0 0 0 87 ))2 2649 Synagro,AZ(dry metric tons) 0 0 0 0 29 569 165 0 0 0 46 406 1215 Nursery Pmducls(Compost) wetter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 66 Nursery Products,CA (dry me land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 35 in; Reported values are averages Notice and Necessary Information — Revised"*' FaclIIty Name: Orancie County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:January 1-31,2016 Pollutant and Nitrogen concentrations(reported results may be averages)on 100%dry weight basis. Sampling date(s): 01/06/2016,01/13/2016 As Cd Cu Pb Hg Mo Ni Se gn Org-N Ammonia Cr %solids (mg/kg) (mglkg) (mglkg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mWkg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) I (mWkg) (mg/kg) (mglkg) Result Plant 1 6.3 1.6 390 '11 0.62 12 44 9.7 540 53,000 6,200 32 18 Result Plant 2 6.8 2.3 410 9.7 0.65 11 41 9.4 620 44,000 5,000 34 22 Table 41 39 1,500 300 17 N/A 426 100 2,800 N/A N/A N/A N/A Tablet 75 85 4,300 840 57 75 420 100 7,500 N/A N/A 3.000 N/A Class B Pathogen Reduction Vector Attraction Reduction Class B pathogen reduction requirements from 40 CFR Part 503 and The vector attraction reduction requirements of 40 CFR Part 503 and Arizona Arizona Administrative Code R18-9-1006€have been met via anaerobic Administrative Code R18-9-1010(A)have been met using data (may be digestion under the following parameters: averages)analyzed by an Arizona-certified laboratory to comply with Option 1. Mean Residence Mean minimum %Volatile Solids Time(days) Temperature(°F) Min Max (All digesters) Plant 1 3I. Out Reduction .6 1.4 62 Plant 1" 18 20 97-98 Plant 20 22 96-100 Plant 2 3.8 1.4 65 Certifications: NPOES permit:I cert/y, underpenaffy of law,that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law,that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B:I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description ofpathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. 2/62017 2/6/2017 2/6/2017 X X c James Spears ispears@ocsd.com James E.Colston icolston@ocsd.com Ronald Coss rcoss@ocsd.com Operations Manaqer (714)593-7081 Dir.of Environmental Services (714)593-7450 Lab,Monitorinq, &Compliance Manaqer (... Siqned by:Spears,Jim Signed by.Colston,Jim Siqned by rcoss@ocsd.com Notice and Necessary Information —Addendum Individual Digester Mean Cell Residence Times and Minimum Temperatures Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1.Fountain Valley.CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach.CA Monitoring Period:January 1-31,2016 OCSD Plant 1— Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig.10 Dig. 11 Dig.12 Dig.13 Dig.14 Dig. 15 Dig. 16 Minimum Mean Cell 18 18 18 18 18 19 19 Residence Time (days)* Minimum 98 98 98 98 97 97 97 Temperature(°F) Shaded box represents Digester Is Out of Service. 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. OCSD Plant 2 Dig.C Dig.D Dig. E Dig.F Dig. G Dig. H Dig. I Dig.J Dig. L Dig.M Dig.N Dig.O Dig. P Dig.O Dig.R Dig.S Dig.T Minimum Mean Cell 20 21 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 jr2000 21 21 Residence Time (days)" Minimum 96 96 96 96 98 97 100 99 98 97 98 98 97 Temperature(°F) Shaded box represents Digester is Out of Service. 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. "In March 2016, an error was discovered with the primary sludge flow meters at Plant 1 that had the potential to affect digester mean cell residence time when the flow exceeded a certain volume.The error is believed to have started in May 2012. Corrective actions have been implemented and primary flow values and digester detention times have been recalculated for all affected days in 2016. Per the calculations, compliance was maintained at all times thus far in 2016. "' During annual reporting, an error was discovered with the rounding of some values that caused the reported result to be inaccurate by one digit. The affected values for Arsenic, Copper, Mercury and Selenium have been revised. Notice and Necessary Information — Revised'"* Fact IIty Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:February 1-29,2016 Pollutant and Nitrogen concentrations(reported results may be averages)on 100%dry weight basis. Sampling date(s): 02/03/2016,02/10/2016 As Cd Cu Pb Hg Mo Ni Se gn Org-N Ammonia Cr %solids (mg/kg) (mglkg) (mgrkg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mWkg) (mg/kg) (mg kg) (mg/kg) I (mWkg) (mg/kg) (mglkg) Result Plant 1 6.4 12.3 440 <23 0.87 11 29 9.8 500 59,000 6,000 31 18 Result Plant 2 8.5 2.9 450 <18 1.1 13 31 7.6 640 45,000 5,200 34 22 Table 41 39 1,500 300 17 N/A 420 100 2,800 N/A N/A N/A N/A Tablet 75 85 4,300 840 57 75 420 100 7,500 N/A N/A 3.000 N/A Class B Pathogen Reduction Vector Attraction Reduction Class B pathogen reduction requirements from 40 CFR Part 503 and The vector attraction reduction requirements of 40 CFR Part 503 and Arizona Arizona Administrative Code R18-9-1006(E)have been met via anaerobic Administrative Code R18-9-1010(A)have been met using data (may be digestion under the following parameters: averages)analyzed by an Arizona certified laboratory to comply with Option 1: Mean Residence Mean minimum %Volatile Solids Time(days) Temperature(°F) Min Max (All digesters) In Out Reduction Plant 1" 17 22 97- 98 Plant 1 3.6 1.4 63 Plant 20 21 97- 100 Plant 2 3.2 1.3 60 Certifications: NPOES permit:I certify, underpenaky of law,that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orimmons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B:I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment 2/6/2017 2172017 2/72017 James Spears ispears@ocsd.com James E.Colston icolston@ocsd.com Ronald Coss rcoss@ocsd.com Operations Manager (714)593-7081 Dir.of Environmental Services (714)593-7450 Enviro. tab and OM Manager (714)593-7508 Signed by Spears,Jim Signed by:Colston,Jim Signed by:Coss,Ronald ' Notice and Necessary Information —Addendum Individual Digester Mean Cell Residence Times and Minimum Temperatures Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1.Fountain Valley.CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach,CA Monitoring Period: February 1-29,2016 OCSD Plant 1— Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig. 10 Dig. 11 Dig. 12 Dig.13 Dig.14 Dig. 15 Dig. 16 Minimum Mean Cell 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 Residence Time (days)* Minimum 98 97 97 98 97 97 97 Temperature(*F) Shaded box represents Digester Is Out of Service. *MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. OCSD Plant 2 Dig.C Dig.D Dig. E Dig.F Dig.G Dig.H Dig.I Dig.J Dig.L Dig.M Dig.N Dig.O Dig.P Dig.Q Dig.R Dig.S Dig.T Minimum Mean Cell 20 20 19 19 19 19 20 4F 20 20 19 19 19 20 20 Residence Time (days)* Minimum 98 99 98 98 99 98 100 99 97 98 99 100 99 99 Temperature(*F) Shaded box represents Digester is Out of Service. 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. ** In March 2016, an error was discovered with the primary sludge flow meters at Plant 1 that had the potential to affect digester mean cell residence time when the flow exceeded a certain volume. The error is believed to have started in May 2012. Corrective actions have been implemented and primary flow values and digester detention times have been recalculated for all affected days in 2016. Per the calculations, compliance was maintained at all times thus far in 2016. *** During annual reporting, an error was discovered with the rounding of some values that caused the reported result to be inaccurate by one digit. The affected values for Arsenic, Copper, Mercury, Molybdenum and Nickel have been revised. Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period: March 1-31,2016 Pollutant and Nitrogen concentrations(reported results may be averages on 100%dry weight basis). Sampling date(s): 03/02(2016.03/09/2016 As Cd Cu Pb Hg Mo Ni Se ign Org-N Ammonia Cr %solids (mg/kg) (mglkg) (mgrkg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mWkg) (mg/kg) mg kg) (mg/kg) I (mWkg) (mg/kg) (mglkg) Result Plant 1 8.3 2.4 450 <11 0.60 12 31 9.1 560 61,000 6,200 72 18 Result Plant 2 8.7 3.1 490 12 0.85 14 33 8.4 730 45,000 5,300 60 22 Table 41 39 1,500 300 17 N/A 420 100 2,800 N/A N/A N/A N/A Tablet 75 85 4,300 840 57 75 420 100 7,500 N/A N/A 3.000 N/A Class B Pathogen Reduction Vector Attraction Reduction Class B pathogen reduction requirements from 40 CFR part 503 and The vector attraction reduction requirements of 40 CFR part 503 and Arizona Arizona Administrative Code R18-9-1006(E) have been met via Administrative Code R18-9-1010(A)have been met using data(may be anaerobic digestion under the following parameters: averages)analyzed by an Arizona certified laboratory to comply with Option 1. Mean Residence Mean minimum %Volatile Solids Time(days) Temperature(°F) Min Max (All digesters) I. Out Reduction Plant 1 3.6 1.4 61 Plant 1 17 20 97- 98 Plant2 3.8 1.5 62 Plant 20 22 98- 100 Certifications: NPOES permit:I cattily, underpenaffy of law,that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B:I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. 7�I 7/5/2016 , (,�7/12/2016 7/12/2016 X r/ — X "� �' C- —" - X Ron Coss James Spears jspears@ocsd.com lames E.Colston icolston@oad.com Ronald Coss rmss@ocsd.mm Operations Manager (714)593-7081 Env.Compliance Manager (714)593-7450 Laboratory Manager (714)593-7508 Signed by:Spears,Jim Signed by Colston,Jim Signed by:Coss,Ronald ' Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information — Addendum Individual Digester Mean Cell Residence Times and Minimum Temperatures Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1.Fountain Valley.CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach,CA Monitoring Period:March 1-31,2016 OCSD Plant 1 Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig. 10 Dig. 11 Dig. 12 Dig. 13 Dig. 14 Dig. 15 Dig. 16 Minimum Mean Cell 16 17 17 17 16 17 17 242"' Residence Time (days)* Minimum 97 97 97 98 97 98 97 98 Temperature(*F) Shaded box represents Digester Is Out of Service. *MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. OCSD Plant 2 Dig.C Dig.D Dig.E Dig.F Dig.G Dig.H Dig. I Dig.J Dig.L Dig.M Dig.N Dig.O Dig.P Dig.O Dig. R Dig.S Dig.T Minimum Mean Cell 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Residence Time (days)* Minimum 99 99 99 98 100 98 100 99 99 99 99 100 99 99 Temperature(*F) Shaded box represents Digester is Out of Service. 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. ** In March 2016, an error was discovered with the primary sludge flow meters at Plant 1 that had the potential to affect digester mean cell residence time when the flow exceeded a certain volume.The error is believed to have started in May 2012. Corrective actions have been implemented and primary flow values and digester detention times have been recalculated for all affected days in 2016. Per the calculations, compliance was maintained at all times thus far in 2016. *** Following cleaning and rehabilitation,digester 15 was filled with digested sludge and then placed in service on March 28, 2016. Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:April 1-30,2016 Pollutant and Nitrogen concentrations(reported results may be averages on 100%dry weight basis). Sampling date(s): 04/06/2016,0411312016 As Cd Cu Pb Hg Mo Ni Se Zn Ore-N Ammonia Cr %solids (mgtkg) (m9tk9) (m9rk9) (mgtkg) (mg/k9) (m9rk9) (mWkg) (mg/kg) (mgtko, (m9rk9) (mWkg) (mg/kg) Result Plant 1 7.0 1.3 480 14 0.64 15 36 10 640 49,000 6,600 89 18 Result Plant 8.8 2.2 520 15 0.91 16 31 10 760 44,000 5,500 55 21 Table 41 39 1,500 300 17 NIA 420 100 2,800 NIA N/A N/A NIA Table 1 75 85 4,300 840 57 75 420 100 7,500 NIA N/A 3'000 NIA Class B Pathogen Reduction Vector Attraction Reduction Class B pathogen reduction requirements from 40 CFR part 503 and The vector attraction reduction requirements of 40 CFR part 503 and Arizona Arizona Administrative Code R18-9-1006 (E) have been met via Administrative Code R18-9-1010(A)have been met using data (may be anaerobic digestion under the following parameters: averages)analyzed by an Arizona certified laboratory to comply with Option 1: Mean Residence Mean minimum %Volatile Solids Time(days) Temperature(°F) Min Plant 1 3 Max (All digesters) I. Out Reduction .6 1.5 59 Plant 1 20 21 98 Plant 2 3.8 1.6 59 Plant 20 22 98- 100 Certifications: NPDES permit:I certiy,underpenalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B:I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. 8/32016 n-�o,�.�, /� �� 8/�3/2016 7/282016 XX V X Ron Coss James Spears Ispeam@ocsd.com James E.Colston Icolston@ocsd.com Ronald Coss rcoss@ocsd.mm Operations Manager (714)593-7081 Director of Environmental Services (714)593... Enviro.Lab and O&M Manager (714)593-7508 Signed by:Spears,Jim Signed by Colston,Jim Signed by:Coss,Ronald Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information — Addendum Individual Digester Mean Cell Residence Times and Minimum Temperatures Facility Name:Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley.CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach,CA Monitoring Period:April 1-30,2016 OCSD Plant 1 Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig. 10 Dig. 11 Dig. 12 Dig. 13 Dig. 14 Dig. 15 Dig. 16 Minimum Mean Cell 18 18 18 18 17 18 24— Residence Time (days)` Minimum 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 Temperature ff) Shaded box represents Digester is Out of Service. 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. OCSD Plant 2 Dig. C Dig.D Dig.E Dig.F Dig.G Dig.H Dig. I Dig.J Dig. L Dig. M Dig. N Dig.0 Dig. P Dig. Q Dig. R Dig.S Dig.T Minimum Mean Cell 21 21 20 20 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 Residence Time (days)* Minimum 100 100 99 99 99 98 100 99 99 98 98 100 99 100 Temperature ff) Shaded box represents Digester is Out of Service. `MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. ** Following cleaning and rehabilitation, digester 15 was filled with digested sludge and then placed in service on March 28, 2016. Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period: May 1-31,2016 Pollutant and Nitrogen concentrations(reported results may be averages on 100%dry weight basis). Sampling date(s): 05/04/2016,0511112016 As Cd Cu Pb Hg Mo Ni Se Zn Ore-N Ammonia Cr %solids (mglkg) (m9tk9) (mgrk9) (mglkg) (mg/k9) (mgrk9) (mglkg) (mg/k9) (mgtko, (mgrk9) (mglkg) (mg/kg) Result Plant 1 6.7 1.3 410 <12 1.7 13 34 4.4 540 45,000 6,400 47 17 Result Plant 7.5 2.0 460 11 0.94 15 29 5.5 700 41,000 5,100 44 21 Table 41 39 1,500 300 17 N/A 420 100 2,800 N/A N/A N/A N/A Table 1 75 85 4,300 840 57 75 420 100 7,500 N/A N/A 3'000 N/A Class B Pathogen Reduction Vector Attraction Reduction Class B pathogen reduction requirements from 40 CFR part 503 and The vector attraction reduction requirements of 40 CFR part 503 and Arizona Arizona Administrative Code R18-9-1006 (E) have been met via Administrative Code R18-9-1010(A)have been met using data (may be anaerobic digestion under the following parameters: averages)analyzed by an Arizona certified laboratory to comply with Option 1. Mean Residence Mean minimum %Volatile Solids Time(days) Temperature(°F) Min Max (All digesters) Plant 1 3I. Out Reduction .6 1.5 58 Plants 19 20 98- 99 Plant 2 3.6 1.4 63 Plant 21 24 98- 101 Certifications: NPDES permit:I certiy,underpenalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is,to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B:1 certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. 8222016 8/23/2016 8/182016 X X L- � X Ron Coss James Spears Ispeam@ocsd.com lames E.Colston )colston@ocsd.com Ronald Coss rwss@msd.com Operations Manager (714)593-7081 Dir.of Environmental Services (714)593-7.., Enviro Lab and O&M Manager (714)593-7508 Signed by:Spears,Jim Signed by Colston,Jim Signed by:Coss,Ronald Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information — Addendum Individual Digester Mean Cell Residence Times and Minimum Temperatures Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley.CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach.CA tr Monitoring Period: May 1-31,2016 OCSD Plant 1 Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig. 10 Dig. 11 Dig. 12 Dig. 13 Dig.14 Dig.15 Dig.16 Minimum Mean Cell 17 17 18 18 19 17 18 47" Residence Time (days)` Minimum 98 98 98 98 99 98 99 99 Temperature ff) Shaded box represents Digester is Out of Service. 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. OCSD Plant 2 Dig.C Dig. D Dig.E Dig.F Dig.G Dig.H Dig. I Dig.J Dig. L Dig. M Dig. N Dig.O Dig. P Dig. Q Dig. R Dig.S Dig.T Minimum Mean Cell 21 21 20 20 21 21 21 21 21 22 23 20 21 21 Residence Time (days)* Minimum 99 100 98 99 99 100 99 99 98 98 100 100 99 101 Temperature ff) Shaded box represents Digester is Out of Service. 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. ** Following cleaning and rehabilitation, digester 16 was filled with digested sludge and then placed in service on May 13,2016. Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period: June 1-30, 2016 Pollutant and Nitrogen concentrations(reported results may be averages on 100%dry weight basis). Sampling date(s): 0610112016,06108/2016 As Cd Cu Pb Hg Mo Ni Se Zn Org-N I Ammonia Cr %solids (mg/kg) I (mg/kg) (mg/kg) I (mglkg) I (mg/kg) (mg/kg) I (mglkg) I (mg/kg) I (mg/kg) I (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Result Plant 1 12 2.7 450 <25 1.3 15 43 9.3 630 56,000 6,200 44 17 Result Plant 2 10 3.1 460 <20 1.2 16 32 8.8 720 44,000 5,200 47 21 Table 3 41 39 1,500 300 17 N/A 420 100 2,800 N/A NIA N/A N/A Table 1 75 85 4,300 840 57 75 420 100 7,500 N/A NIA 3,000 N/A Class B Pathogen Reduction Vector Attraction Reduction Class B pathogen reduction requirements from 40 CFR part 503 and The vector attraction reduction requirements of 40 CFR part 503 and Arizona Arizona Administrative Code R18-9-1006-(E)have been met via Administrative Code R18-9-1010(A)have been met using data (may be anaerobic digestion under the following parameters: averages)analyzed by an Arizona certified laboratory to comply with Option 1. Mean Residence Mean minimum %Volatile Solids Time(days) Temperature(°F) I. Out Reduction Min Max (All digesters) Plant 1 31 1.5 54 Plant 17 19 99 Plant 24 24 99- 101 Plant 2 3.8 1.5 62 Certifications: NPDES permit: I certify,underpenalty of law,that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B:I certify,under penalty of law, that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B:1 certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. 9/28/2016 10/32016 102/2016 XX X Rnnalri Cott James Spears (spears@ocsd.com James E.Colston jcolston@ocsd.com Ronald Coss rcoss@ocsd.com Operations Manager (714)593-7081 Cir.of Environmental Services (714)593-7... Enviro Lab and OM Manager (714)593-7508 Signed by:Spears,Jim Signed by Colston,Jim Signed by:Coss,Ronald Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information —Addendum Individual Digester Mean Cell Residence Times and Minimum Temperatures Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1.Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:June 1-30,2016 OCSD Plant 1 Dig.7 Dig. B Dig.9 Dig. 10 Dig. 11 Dig. 12 Dig. 13 Dig.14 Dig.15 Dig.16 Minimum Mean Cell 17 16 17 17 16 18 18 Residence Time (days)* Minimum 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 Temperature(°F) Shaded box represents Digester is Out of Service. 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Railing Average. OCSD Plant 2 Dig.C Dig.D Dig. E Dig.F Dig.G Dig. H Dig. I Dig.J Dig. L Dig.M Dig.N Dig.0 Dig.P Dig.O Dig. R Dig.S Dig.T Minimum Mean Call 23 23 21 22 22 23 23 22 22 22 23 22 22 23 Residence Time (days). Minimum 100 100 100 99 100 100 99 99 99 100 100 101 100 100 Temperature(`F) Shaded box represents Digester is Out of Service. 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:July 1-31,2016 Pollutant and Nitrogen concentrations(reported results may be averages on 100%dryweight basis). Sampling date(s): 07/06/2016,07/1312016 As Cd Cu P6 Hg Mo Ni Se Zn Org-N Ammonia Cr %solids (mg/kg) (mglkg) (mglkg) (mglkg) m lkg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) I (mg/kg) mg/kg) I (mglkg) (nil (mg/kg) Result Plant 1 8.0 3.1 490 -12 0.82 16 39 8.0 670 54,000 6,400 46 17 Result Plant 2 7.5 3.5 510 <10 0.94 17 30 7.8 790 52,000 5,100 44 20 Table 3 41 39 1,500 300 17 N/A 420 100 2,800 N/A N/A N/A N/A Table 1 75 85 4,300 840 57 75 420 100 7,500 N/A N/A 3,000 N/A Class B Pathogen Reduction Vector Attraction Reduction Class B pathogen reduction requirements from 40 CFR part 503 and The vector attraction reduction requirements of 40 CFR part 503 and Arizona Arizona Administrative Code R18-9-1006 (E)have been met via Administrative Code R18-9-1010(A)have been met using data (may be anaerobic digestion under the following parameters: averages)analyzed by an Arizona certified laboratory to comply with Option 1. Mean Residence Mean minimum %Volatile Solids Time(days) Temperature(OF) Min Max (All digesters) Plant 1 3.5 . Plant 17 18 98- 99 5 1 Out Reduction 4 60 Plant 22 23 98- 102 Plant 2 3.6 1.5 59 Certifications: NPDES permit: I certify, under penalty of law,that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualithed personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the information submitted is,to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify,underpenalfy of law, that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B:I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable bioi lids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. /`J p Q 9/26/2016 / 9/29/2016 926/2016 X !/ "' X V �' 'T�'� X Ronald Coss James Spears (spears@oad.com James E.Colston jonston@oosd.com Ronald Css rcoss@ocsdcom Operations Manager (714)593-7081 Dir.of Environmental Services (714)593-7... Enviro Lab and OM Manager (714)593-7508 Signed by. Spears,Jim Signed by Colston,Jim Signed by:Coss,Ronald Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information — Addendum Individual Digester Mean Cell Residence Times and Minimum Temperatures Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley,CA and Treatment Plant#2 Huntington Beach CA Monitoring Period:July 1-31,2016 OCSD Plant 1 Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig. 10 Dig. 11 Dig. 12 Dig. 13 Dig. 14 Dig. 15 Dig. 16 Minimum Mean Cell 17 17 17 17 17 18 18 Residence Time (days)" Minimum 98 98 98 98 99 98 98 Temperature(°F) Shaded box represents Digester is Out of Service. 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. OCSD Plant 2 Dig. C Dig.D Dig. E Dig.F Dig. G Dig. H Dig. I Dig.J Dig. L Dig.M Dig. N Dig. O Dig.P Dig.O Dig. R Dig.S Dig.T Minimum Mean Cell 22 22 21 21 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 21 22 22 Residence Time (days)* Minimum 99 101 99 101 102 100 99 100 99 98 100 100 100 100 Temperature('F) Shaded box represents Digester is Out of Service. 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:August 1-31,2016 Pollutant and Nitrogen concentrations(reported results may be averages on 100%dry weight basis). Sampling date(s): 08/03/2016,08/10/2016,0811712016 As Cd Cu Pb Hg Mo Ni Se ign Org-N Ammonia Cr %solids (mglkg) (mglkg) (mglkg) (mglkg) (ir lkg) (r lkg) (mglkg) (mglkg) (mg/kg) nr lk9) (o lk9) (mglkg) Result Plant 1 6.7 2.6 400 <13 0.53 12 25 9.3 550 55,000 6,300 30 16 Result Plant 2 5.6 3.6 480 12 0.72 15 30 6.7 730 50,000 4,700 40 21 Table 41 39 1,500 300 17 N/A 420 100 2,800 N/A N/A N/A N/A Tablet 75 85 4,300 840 57 75 420 100 7,500 N/A N/A 3,000 N/A Class B Pathogen Reduction Vector Attraction Reduction Class B pathogen reduction requirements from 40 CFR part 503 and The vector attraction reduction requirements of 40 CFR part 503 and Arizona Arizona Administrative Code R18-9-1006(E) have been met via Administrative Code R18-9-1010(A)have been met using data(may be anaerobic digestion under the following parameters: averages)analyzed by an Arizona certified laboratory to comply with Option 1. Mean Residence Mean minimum %Volatile Solids Time(days) Temperature(°F) Min Max (All digesters) I. . Out Reduction Plant 1 34 14 6 Plant 21 23 99- 100 1 Plant 1 n 18 98 Plant2 3.6 1.5 60 Certifications: NPOES permit:I certify, underpenaffy of law,that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law,that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B:I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description ofpathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. 10/17/2016 10/17/2016 10/172016 X X - X James Spears jspeam@ocsd.com James E.Colston Icolston@ocsd.mm Ronald Coss rcoss@oadcom Operations Manager (714)593-7081 Din of Environmental Services (714)593-7... Enviro Lab and OM Manager p14)593-7508 Signed by:Spears,Jim Signed by Colston,Jim Signed by:Coss.Ronald ' Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information —Addendum Individual Digester Mean Cell Residence Times and Minimum Temperatures Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley.CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach,CA Monitoring Period:August 1-31.2016 OCSD Plant 1 Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig. 10 Dig. 11 Dig. 12 Dig. 13 Dig. 14 Dig.15 Dig.16 Minimum Mean Cell 17 17 17 17 17 18 18 Residence Time (days)* Minimum 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 Temperature ff) Shaded box represents Digester Is Out of Service. *MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. OCSD Plant 2 Dig.C Dig.D Dig. E Dig.F Dig.G Dig.H T121 Dig.M Dig.N Dig.O Dig.P Dig.Q Dig.R Dig.S Dig.T Minimum Mean Cell 21 21 20 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 Residence Time(days)* Minimum 99 100 99 100 100 99 99 99 100 100 100 100 Temperature ff) Shaded box represents Digester is Out of Service. 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:September 1-30,2016 Pollutant and Nitrogen concentrations(reported results may be averages on 100%dry weight basis). Sampling details): 09/07/2016,09/14/2016 As Cd Cu Pb Hg Mo Ni Se gn Org-N Ammonia Cr %solids (mg/kg) (mglkg) (mgtkg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mWkg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) I (mWkg) (mg/kg) (mglkg) Result Plant 1 7.6 3.6 520 <13 0.94 21 37 8.8 700 58,000 6,600 38 17 Result Plant 6.7 4.5 510 14 1.2 17 35 8.3 750 45,000 5,100 43 21 Table 41 39 1,500 300 17 N/A 420 100 2,800 N/A N/A N/A N/A Tablet 75 85 4,300 840 57 75 420 100 7,500 N/A N/A 3.000 N/A Class B Pathogen Reduction Vector Attraction Reduction Class B pathogen reduction requirements from 40 CFR part 503 and The vector attraction reduction requirements of 40 CFR part 503 and Arizona Arizona Administrative Code R18-9-1006(E) have been met via Administrative Code R18-9-1010(A)have been met using data (may be anaerobic digestion under the following parameters: averages)analyzed by an Arizona certified laboratory to comply with Option 1. Mean Residence Mean minimum %Volatile Solids Time(days) Temperature(°F) Min Max (All digesters) Plant 1 3I. Out Reduction .3 1.3 62 Plant 1 n 18 98 Plant 21 21 98- 101 Plant2 3.5 1.5 59 Certifications: NPOES permit:I certify, underpenalty of law,that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, thus, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B:I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description ofpathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. p� Q 282016 11/29/2016 11/29/2016 X0 °� — X ` G X � �James Spears ispeam@ocsd.com lames E.Colston k lsion@ocsd.mm Ronald Coss rcoss®oad.00nn Operations Manager (714)593-7081 Dir.of Environmental Services (I14)593-7450 Enviro Lab and OM Manager (714)593-7508 Signed by Spears,Jim Signed by Colston,Jim Signed by:Coss,Ronald Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information —Addendum Individual Digester Mean Cell Residence Times and Minimum Temperatures Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1.Fountain Valley.CA and Treatment Plant#2.Huntington Beach.CA Monitoring Period: September 1-30,2016 OCSD Plant 1 Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig.10 Dig. 11 Dig. 12 Dig.13 Dig.14 Dig.15 Dig.16 Minimum Mean Cell 16 16 17 17 16 17 17 Residence Time (days)* Minimum 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 Temperature(°F) Shaded box represents Digester Is Out of Service. 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. OCSD Plant 2 Dig.C Dig.D Dig. E Dig. F Dig.G Dig. H Dig. I Dig.J Dig. L Dig. M Dig. N Dig.0 Dig.P Dig.O Dig.R Dig.S Dig.T Minimum Mean Cell 21 21 20 20 21 21 21 21 20 20 21 20 20 21 Residence Time (days)" Minimum 100 100 99 100 100 190 99 99 99 98 100 100 99 101 Temperature ff) Shaded box represents Digester is Out of Service. 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:October 1-31,2016 Pollutant and Nitrogen concentrations(reported results may be averages on 100%dry weight basis). Sampling date(s): 10/05/2016,10/12/2016 As Cd Cu Pb Hg Mo Ni Se Zn Org-N Ammonia Cr %solids (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mWkg) (mg/kg) (mg kg) (mg/kg) I (mWkg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Result Plant 1 6.7 6.1 490 11 0.87 16 30 8.1 670 51,000 6,200 40 19 Result Plant 2 7.2 6.1 490 13 0.52 16 30 6.9 740 45,000 5,300 39 21 Table 41 39 1,500 300 17 N/A 420 100 2,800 N/A N/A N/A N/A Tablet 75 85 4,300 840 57 75 420 100 7,500 N/A N/A 3.000 N/A Class B Pathogen Reduction Vector Attraction Reduction Class B pathogen reduction requirements from 40 CFR part 503 and The vector attraction reduction requirements of 40 CFR part 503 and Arizona Arizona Administrative Code R18-9-1006(E) have been met via Administrative Code R18-9-1010(A)have been met using data (may be anaerobic digestion under the following parameters: averages)analyzed by an Arizona certified laboratory to comply with Option 1. Mean Residence Mean minimum %Volatile Solids Time(days) Temperature(°F) Min Max (All digesters) Plant 1 3I. Out Reduction .3 1.3 62 Plant 1 17 19 98 4 Plant 20 21 98- 101 Plant 2 4.3 1. 68 Certifications: NPOES permit:I certify, underpenalty of law,that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B:I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description ofpathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. 1 am aware that then;are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. 12/27/2016 12/302016 1221/2016 X X James Spears ispears@oad.com James E.Colston icolston@oad.com Ronald Coss rcoss@.d,.m Operations Manager (714)593-7081 Di,of Environmental Services (714)593-7450 Enviro Lab and OM Manager (714)593-7508 Signed by Spears,Jim Signed by Colston,Jim Signed by:Coss,Ronald ' Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information —Addendum Individual Digester Mean Cell Residence Times and Minimum Temperatures Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley.CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach,CA Monitoring Period:October 1-31,2016 OCSD Plant 1 Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig. 10 Dig. 11 Dig. 12 Dig. 13 Dig. 14 Dig.15 Dig.16 Minimum Mean Cell 16 16 17 17 20 17 17 Residence Time (days)* Minimum 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 Temperature ff) Shaded box represents Digester Is Out of Service. *MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. OCSD Plant 2 Dig.C Dig.D Dig. E Dig.F Dig.G Dig.H Dig.I Dig.J Dig.L Dig.M Dig.N Dig.O Dig.P Dig.Q Dig.R Dig.S Dig.T Minimum Mean Cell 21 21 20 20 20 20 24— 21 21 20 20 21 20 20 21 Residence Time (days)* Minimum 98 100 99 100 99 100 101 99 99 99 100 100 99 99 101 Temperature ff) Shaded box represents Digester is Out of Service. 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. Digester J was placed into service on October 20,2016. Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period: November 1-30,2016 Pollutant and Nitrogen concentrations(reported results may be averages on 100%dry weight basis). Sampling date(s): 11/02/2016.11/09/2016.11/10/2016 As Cd Cu Pb Hg Mo Ni Se ign Org-N Ammonia Cr %solids (mg/kg) (mglkg) (mglkg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mWkg) (mg/kg) long kg) (mg/kg) (mWkg) (mWkg) (mglkg) Result Plant 1 7.6 6.0 440 14 0.82 15 27 8.6 600 50,000 6,400 34 18 Result Plant 2 6.4 6.7 530 15 0.88 15 32 6.0 760 42,000 5,100 39 21 Table 41 39 1,500 300 17 N/A 420 100 2,800 N/A N/A N/A N/A Tablet 75 85 4,300 840 57 75 420 100 7,500 N/A N/A 3,000 N/A Class B Pathogen Reduction Vector Attraction Reduction Class B pathogen reduction requirements from 40 CFR part 503 and The vector attraction reduction requirements of 40 CFR part 503 and Arizona Arizona Administrative Code R18-9-1006(E) have been met via Administrative Code R18-9-1010(A)have been met using data(may be anaerobic digestion under the following parameters: averages)analyzed by an Arizona certified laboratory to comply with Option 1. Mean Residence Mean minimum %Volatile Solids Time(days) Temperature(°F) Min Max (All digesters) Plant 1 3I. Out Reduction .3 1.3 62 Plant 1 17 19 98 Plant2 3.9 1.4 65 Plant 21 23 98- 101 Certifications: NPOES permit:I certify, underpenalty of law,that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law,that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B:I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description ofpathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. 1 212 712 01 6 p,,_, 1/42017 12/212016 James Spears ispears@ocsd.com James E.Colston jcolston@ocsd.com Ronald Coss rcoss@p d.com Operations Manager (714)593-7081 Dir.of Environmental Services (714)593-7450 Enviro Lab and OM Manager (714)593-7508 Signed by,Spears,Jim Signed by..Colston,Jim Signed by:Coss,Ronald Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information —Addendum Individual Digester Mean Cell Residence Times and Minimum Temperatures Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period: November 1-30,201fi OCSD Plant 1 Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig.10 Dig.11 Dig.12 Dig.13 Dig.14 Dig.15 Dig.16 Minimum Mean Cell 16 16 17 17 18 11 11 Residence Time (days)* Minimum 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 Temperature(°F) Shaded box represents Digester Is Out of Service. *MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. OCSD Plant 2 Dig.C Dig.D Dig. E Dig. F Dig.G Dig. H Dig.1 Dig.J Dig. L Dig. M Dig. N Dig.0 Dig.P Dig.O Dig.R Dig.S Dig.T Minimum Mean Cell 21 20 20 21 20 21 22 21 21 21 21 20 21 21 Residence Time (days)" Minimum 98 98 99 98 100 101 99 98 98 98 100 98 98 99 Temperature ff) Shaded box represents Digester is Out of Service. 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period: December 1-31,2016 Pollutant and Nitrogen concentrations(reported results may be averages)on 100%dry weight basis. Sampling details): 12/07/2016,12/14/2016,1212112016 As Cd Cu Pb Hg Mo Ni Se ign Org-N Ammonia Cr %solids (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mWkg) (mg/kg) mg kg) (mg/kg) (mWkg) (mWkg) (mg/kg) Result Plant 1 7.7 4.2 420 <12 1.0 14 27 5.4 610 55,000 6,500 35 17 Result Plant 2 6.3 5.2 490 13 0.82 15 27 3.8 760 41,000 7,800 40 21 Table 41 39 1,500 300 17 N/A 420 100 2,800 N/A N/A N/A N/A Tablet 75 85 4,300 840 57 75 420 100 7,500 N/A N/A 3,000 N/A Class B Pathogen Reduction Vector Attraction Reduction Class B pathogen reduction requirements from 40 CFR part 503 and The vector attraction reduction requirements of 40 CFR part 503 and Arizona Arizona Administrative Code R18-9-1006(E) have been met via Administrative Code R18-9-1010(A)have been met using data(may be anaerobic digestion under the following parameters: averages)analyzed by an Arizona certified laboratory to comply with Option 1. Mean Residence Mean minimum %Volatile Solids Time(days) Temperature(°F) Min Max (All digesters) I. Out Reduction Plant 1 30 1.2 60 Plant 1 17 19 98- 99 Plant 2 3.5 1.4 62 Plant 20 22 96- 101 Certifications: NPOES permit:I certify, under penalty of law,that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law,that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B:/certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. 1/24/2017 / Vr4renn 1/182017 X XUnne,En£ Jro—lst n@ocedwm X James Spears jspears@ocsd.com oi..of Environmental Eenices m4)5934450 Ronald Coss rcoss@ocsd.com Operations Manager p Signed by Colston,Jim14)593-]081 Enviro Lab and OM Manager p147593-7508 Signed by Spears,Jim Signed by Coss,Ronald F Biosolids Notice and Necessary Information —Addendum Individual Digester Mean Cell Residence Times and Minimum Temperatures Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1.Fountain Valley.CA and Treatment Plant#2.Huntington Beach.CA Monitoring Period: December 1-31,201fi OCSD Plant 1 Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig.10 Dig.11 Dig.12 Dig.13 Dig.14 Dig.15 Dig.16 Minimum Mean Cell 17 16 17 17 17" 17" 17" Residence Time (days)* Minimum 99 99 99 99 99 99 98 Temperature(°F) Shaded box represents Digester Is Out of Service. *MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. OCSD Plant 2 Dig.C Dig.D Dig. E Dig. F Dig.G Dig. H Dig.I Dig.J Dig. L Dig. M Dig. N Dig.0 Dig.P Dig.O Dig.R Dig.S Dig.T Minimum Mean Cell 21 20 20 20 19 21 21 20 20 20 20 20 20 21 Residence Time (days)" Minimum 96 98 97 97 100 101 99 98 98 96 98 98 98 100 Temperature(*F) Shaded box represents Digester is Out of Service. 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. **On 11/3/2016,instrumentation staff discovered a flowmeter calibration error for digesters It-16 that had occurred when the meter was rescaled on 5/19/2016. As a result,during that period,the reported digestion times were slightly less than actual digestion times. Since recalculation of digestion times would not negatively affect compliance determination,the data will not be corrected and re-reported. APPENDIX B OCSD's Pretreatment Program Annual Report, FY 2015-2016 Solids Management Program, Chapter 9 chapter 9 SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Introduction Biosolids Quality chapter 9 SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 9.1 INTRODUCTION This section provides an overview of OCSD's Biosolids Program, focusing on the Biosolids quality with respect to metals. Biosolids are nutrient-rich, treated organic matter recovered through the treatment of wastewater.These solids are considered a resource because of their nutrient and energy values,and they are recyclable in part because of their low metal content. The pretreatment program is a key element in ensuring the recyclability of OCSD's biosolids by minimizing the discharge of heavy metals and other undesirable constituents into the collection system and ultimately the treated solids, which are used to fertilize farms. OCSD's annual biosolids compliance report was completed,submitted to regulators,and posted online in February.Visit OCSewers.com/503 to access the most recent document that contains Biosolids Program information, regulations, quantities, goals, and how and where biosolids are recycled. 9.2 BIOSOLIDS QUALITY Biosolids quality plays an important role in ensuring the continued recyclability of OCSD's biosolids. OCSD's pretreatment program has been extremely effective in reducing and maintaining levels of pollutants (e.g., OCSD's influent sewage meets drinking water standards for the biosolids monitoring metals).The ceiling concentrations and EQ(exceptional quality)concentrations promulgated by the EPA's biosolids regulations(40 CFR 503)are presented in the figures as a reference. For FY 2015116, OCSD Biosolids met the EQ limits for all the regulated parameters. TABLE 9.1 Trends In Trace Metal Content of Biosolids,Fiscal Years 2007-2016 (Concentration In mglkg,dry weight) Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division Exceptional Plant Nm 1 PlantNo.2 Fiscal Quaw Meta Year Units KI . Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg. Arsenic 41 2006-07 2.7 7.2 5.3 5.1 11 7.3 2007-08 2.9 9.0 6.2 4.1 14 7.9 2008-09 4.3 12 7.1 3.5 13 9.0 2009-10 2.0 10.0 5.2 4.4 10.0 7.2 2010-11 7.2 9.7 8A 8.6 12 10.4 2011-12 2.3 11 7.4 6.6 06 21.5 2012-13 0 7.8 4.7 2 10 7 2013.14 2.2 9.4 6.4 5.4 11 8.4 2014-15 4.5 11.0 7.2 7.8 12 9.3 2015-16 3.8 12 8.0 6.2 12 9.2 9.1 TABLE 9.1 Trends In Trace Metal Content of Biosolids,Fiscal Yeam 2007.2016 (Concentration in mglkg,dry weight) Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division Exceptional Plait No.1 Plerd Nn-2 Fiscal Quaft Metal Yea Lknita Igo. Max Avg. Min. Max Avg. Cadmium 39 2006-07 3.7 6.1 5 2 4 3.3 2007-08 3.2 11 5.5 2.6 6.4 3.8 2008-09 2.5 6.2 4.1 1.7 4.4 3.0 2009-10 1.1 4.4 2.9 1.0 4.8 2.8 2010-11 1.2 3.8 2.6 1.4 5.0 2.5 2011-12 0.8 6 3.8 1.1 4.4 3.6 2012-13 2.6 7.8 4.7 1.9 4.4 3.1 2013-14 1.6 11 3.9 2.1 6 3.5 2014-15 2.7 7.8 5.1 3.1 5.8 4.0 2015.16 1.3 4.7 2.5 2.0 4.5 3.0 Chromium 2006-07 51 77 62 47 86 60 2007-08 50 62 54 46 77 60 2008.09 44 65 55 42 88 62.3 2009.10 29 56 44 30 54 47 2010.11 41 58 47 50 66 59 2011-12 42 74 52 40 70 56 2012-13 42 56 49 42 59 49 2013-14 39 52 45 40 53 46 2014-15 30 51 40 34 70 46 2015-16 31 89 46 28 60 46 Copper 1,500 2006-07 600 800 686 540 020 576 2007-08 600 650 570 460 630 538 2008-09 500 590 560 500 640 523 2009-10 420 620 543 370 560 497 2010-11 520 600 567 500 720 574 2011-12 430 670 518 380 720 522 2012-13 480 640 538 500 640 538 2013-14 460 540 508 470 540 503 2014-15 320 570 468 320 560 469 2016-16 380 560 460 340 570 479 9.2 TABLE 9.1 Trends In Trace Metal Content of Biosolids, Fiscal Years 2007-2016 (Concentration In mglkg,dry weight) Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division EsepBorml Plant NO.11 Plant No.2 Fiscal 0tuaw Metal Year Limits MinM, PAM Avg. Min. Max Avg- Lead 300 2006-07 23 30 26 14 24 21 2007-08 6 30 20 6 24 14 2008-09 11 25 21 6 21 15 2009-10 9 44 23 9 20 17 2010.11 21 24 23 9 30 20 2011-12 ND 24.5 9 ND 32 13 2012-13 7.5 19 15 7.5 16.5 13.7 2013-14 12.5 17.6 14 12.5 16.6 14.4 2014-15 8.7 15 13 9 17 13 2015.16 8.3 20 12 8 17 13 Memry 17 20M07 1.1 2.4 1.6 1.3 2.5 1.7 2007-08 1.1 4.2 1.9 1.3 2.6 1.6 2008-09 1.0 1.9 1.4 1.0 2.6 1.4 2009-10 1.0 32 1.4 0.9 1.6 1.3 2010-11 0.8 2.2 1.3 0.8 2.3 1.2 2011-12 0.8 1.4 1.2 0.8 2.8 1.3 2012-13 0.7 4.1 1.5 0.8 3.8 1.4 2013-14 0.8 1.2 1.0 0.7 2.8 1.4 2014-15 1 1.5 1.08 1 1.5 1 2015-16 0.00 1.7 0.93 0.64 1.2 1 Molybdenum 2006-07 13 22 18 14 18 16 2007-08 12 17 13 12 18 15 2008-09 12 18 15 8 18 14 2009-10 6 16 13 6 14 10 2010.11 12 19 15 4.8 18 14 2011-12 6.5 18 12.9 12 20 17 2012-13 9.8 20 14.2 12 20 15 2013-14 12 18 15 14 18 15 2014.15 9.4 18 15 12 20 16 2015.16 11 18 15 11 23 16 9.3 TABLE 9.1 Trends in Trace Metal Content of Biosolids,Fiscal Years 2007-2016 (Concentration in mglkg,dry weight) Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division Exceptional Plead:No.1 Ward Nm2 Fiwl Quaft Metal Year l.kstls Mm- Max Avg. kiln. stag. Avg. Nickel 420 2006-07 44 60 54 28 44 34 2007-08 34 58 45 24 56 31 2008-09 30 41 35 22 37 29 2009-10 12 36 28 9 27 21 2010-11 28 46 37 14 38 32 2011-12 15 48 35 20 39 31 2012-13 34 48 40 23 41 30 2013-14 36 55 43 28 56 37 2014-15 26 47 37 26 41 34 2015-16 28 45 38 20 41 33 Selenium 100 2008-07 4.7 13 8.2 1.8 14 5.8 2007-08 3.0 14 8 1.4 11 5.6 2008-09 2.5 14.0 9.7 2.8 13 7.5 2009-10 2.7 18 7.3 2.8 16 5.6 2010-11 2.8 26 10.6 3.7 26 9.8 2011-12 ND 26 9 ND 19 9 2012-13 0 20 9 0 20 8 2013-14 1.9 13 7.3 2.7 13 7.7 2014-15 2.9 13.0 6.8 4 15.0 7 2015-16 2.4 10 7.7 2.2 10 7 Silver 2006-07 28 38 31 ND ND ND 2007-08 19 25 22 10 15 13 2008-09 19 24 20.8 9.5 13 11.6 2009-10 10 18 15 7A 13 10 2010-11 10 17 13 5.2 12 9.57 2011-12 7 14 10 4 12 8.5 2012-13 6.2 14 8.6 6.4 13 8.6 2013-14 1.7 7.6 5.7 3.8 9.1 7.0 2014-15 4.9 7.8 6.7 6 8.6 7 2015-16 4.6 7.7 6.1 4.2 8.0 6 9.4 TABLE 9.1 Trends In Trace Metal Content of Biosolids, Fiscal Year:2007-2016 (Concentration In mglkg,dry weight) Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division Exceptional plant No.1 Plant No.2 Fiscal QtmIDy Now Year Limits Min. Max, Avg Min. RU t Avg. Zinc 2,600 2005-06 700 910 801 680 900 760 2006-07 820 1100 900 720 930 790 2007-08 740 890 806 680 790 716 2008-09 720 870 785 700 800 749 2009-10 560 810 741 520 790 710 2010.11 630 740 696 700 830 740 2011-12 560 880 709 560 910 749 2012-13 640 860 723 680 880 768 2013.14 590 730 671 620 750 700 2014-15 420 720 620 465 740 669 201 5 16 500 770 617 520 890 733 No 40 CFR Part 503 Fxceptonal Duality CrBena. ND= Non-detectable 9.5 60 50 —Plant No. 1 —Plant No. 2 Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant Concentration Limit 39 mg/kg 40 m g 30 / It 9 20 Concentration less than 10 0 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Figure 9-1 Trends In Concentrations of Arsenic in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1991-2016 Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division 45 40 —Plant No.1 —Planl No.2 ..................................... 35 30 Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant Concentration Limit 39 mg/kg m 25 (Feb. 1993) 9 1 20 k 9 15 10 5 0 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Figure 9.2 Trends in Concentrations of Cadmium in Biosolids,Fiscal Years 1991.2016 Orange County Sanitation District,Resource Protection Division 9.6 750 —Plant No. 1 —Plant No.2 600 450 There are no biosolids limits m 9 k 300 9 150 0 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Figure 9J Trends in Concentrations of Chromium in Biosolids,Fiscal Years 1991-2016 Orange County Sanitation District,Resource protection Division 2000 1800 —Plant No. 1—Plant No.2 Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids 1600 Pollutant Concentration Limit 1500 --------------------------------- 1400 rn 1200 9 1000 k Soo 9 600 400 200 0 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Figure 94 Trends in Concentrations of Copper in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1991-2016 Orange County Sanitation District, Resource protection Division 9.7 500 —Plant No. 1 —Plant No.2 400 300 --------------------------------- m Exceptional Quality EPA 9 Biosolids Pollutant / Concentration Limit3OO k 200 9 100 0 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Figure 9-5 Trends in Concentrations of Lead in Blosollds,Fiscal Years 1991-2016 Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division 40 35 —Plant No. 1 —Plant No. 2 30 25 m Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids g 20 Pollutant Concentration Limit 17 mg/kg (Feb. 1993) / ....__._.__._.__.............. k 15 9 10 5 0 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Figure 9.6 Trends in Concentrations of Mercury in Biosolids,Fiscal Years 1991-2016 Orange County Sanitation District 9.8 80 --------------------------------- 70 —Plant No. 1 Ceiling Concentration 75mg/kg (Feb. 1993) —Plant No. 2 60 50 m 9 40 No Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant Concentration Limit k 30 9 20 10 0 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Figure 9-7 Trends In Concentrations of Molybdenum in Biosolids,Fiscal Yeats 1991-2016 Orange County Sanitation District,Resource Protection Division 450 --------- ----------------------- 400 —Plant No.t—Plant No.2 Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant Concentration 350 Limit and Ceiling Limit 420 mgtkg (Feb. 1993) 300 m 250 9 / 200 k 150 9 100 50 0 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Figure 9.8 Trends in Concentrations of Nickel in Biosolids,Fiscal Yeats,1991-2016 Orange County Sanitation District,Resource Protection Division 9.9 110 100 ............—.....-------- —Plain No. 1 Exceptonal Quality EPA 90 Biosolids Pollutant 80 Concentration Limit&Ceiling Concentration 100 mgft 70 m 60 9 50 k 40 9 30 Concentration less than 20 10 j 0 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2016 Figure 9-9 Trends in Concentrations of Selenium in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1991-2016 Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division 4000 3500 —Plant No. 1 —Plant No. 2 3000 -------------------------------- 2500 m 9 2000 Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant Concentration Limit 2800 k 1500 mg/kg (Feb. 1993) 9 1000 500 0 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Figure 940 Trends in Concentrations of Zinc in Biosolids,Fiscal Years 1991-2016 Orange County Sanitation District,Resource Protection Division 9.10 This page intentionally left blank APPENDIX C Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Analysis 2015 for Biosolids Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL General Chemistry Hexavalent Chromium Plant Cake EPA7196A mglkg dry NO �290 -- -- -- - NO 15 Ca 0 -- - -- -- Plant2ke EPA71MA mglkg dry ND 220 -- -- - - NO - Total Cyanide Plant Cake EPA9014 mglkg dry ND 12..B -- -- - - NO 2.9 - - -- - Plant 2Cake EPA9014 mglkg dry 3.3 12.2 -- -- -- - NO 2.4 -- - -- -- Corrosivity Plant 1 Cake EPA9045C - NE -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- Plant2 Cake EPA904513 - NEG - -- - - - - -- - - - - Nitrate Plant Cake EPA300.0 mglkg dry ND 6.3 - - - - - -- - - - - Plant 2Cake EPA300.0 mglkg dry 11 14.8 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Ammonia Nitrogen Plant 1 Cake SM 4500 NH3 mglkg dry 6150 11400 6000 1400 6150 1400 6550 1500 6400 1600 6200 1500 D _ Plant 2 Cake SM 4500 NH3 mgdag cry 5000 1100 5150 1100 530�1100 5450 1200 5050 1200 5200 1300 D Organic Nitrogen Plant l Cake CALC mglkg dry 53350 - 59000 -- 81350 - 49450 -- 44600 - 55800 -- Plant 2 Cake CALC mgBg dry 44000 - 44850 45200 44050 40950 43800 Organic Lead Plant Cake HML 939-M mglkg dry ND 05 - - - - NO .06 - - -- -- Plant 2Cake HML 939-M mglkg dry IND 1.1 -- -- -- -- NO .048 -- - -- pH Plant Cake EPA9045C pH units 8 1 -- -- -- -- T48 .1 Plant Cake EPA9045C pH units 17.92 1.1 7.61 .1 Sulfide Plant Cake EPA9034 mglkg dry ND 230 -- -- - - - - - - -�� Plant 2 Cake EPA9034 mglkg dry 250 180 -- -- -- -- -- -- - - -- -- TKN Plant 1 Cake EPA351.2 mglkg dry 59500 1100 65000 7200 67500 6900 56000 7400 51000 7800 62000 7700 Plant 2 Cake EPA351.2 mglkg dry 49000 J5700 50000 560050500 570OJ49500 6000 46000 16100149000 163M Total Solids Plant 1 Cake SM 2540G % 18.5 LOS 17.5 L.O05 27 552 22 OS 21 .OS 20.5 OSPlant 2 Cke SM 2540G %Trace Elements Fluoride Plant 1 Cake EPA300.0 mglkg dry 35 J29 -- -- - Plant Cake EPA300.0 mglkg dry 32 22 Potassium Plant 1 Cake EPA6010B mgdcg dry 1100 280 -- -- - - - -- - Plant 2Cake EPA 6010B r lkg dry 900 1440 -- -- -- - - -- ' � Mercury Plant Cake EPA 7471A r lkg dry 1.615 1.11 .865 .12 .595 .11 .64 .12 1.65 1.13 1.3 .25 Plant 2 Cake EPA7471A mglkg dry .645 .089 1.05 .09 .85 .091 .91 .096 .935 .098 1.15 .21 Antimony Plant Cake EPA6010B mgdcg tlry 4.4 11 -- -- - - NO 12 9.5 Plant 2 Cake EPA6010B mglkgdry 3.7 8.8 -- --� - ND .5 Arsenic Plant Cake EPA 6010B mglkg dry 6.25 1.7 6.4 3.4 8.25 1.7 7 1.8 6.65 1.9 12 3.7 Plant 2 Cake EPA6010B mglkg dry 6.75 1.4 8.45 2.7 8.85 1.4 8.75 1.5 17.45 11.5 110.45 13.1 Barium Plant l Cake EPA 60106 mgN dry I470 15.7 -- - - - 1470 15.9 - - - -- Plant2Cake EPA 6010B mglkg dry 180 4.4 - - - - 1100 4.7 - - - -- Beryllium Plant Cake EPA 6010B mglkg dry IND 1.57 - - - - IND 1.59 - - -- -- Page 1 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean General Chemistry Hexavalent Chromium Plants Cake mg/kg dry NO 62 -- _ _ -- NO130 Plant 2 Cake mg/kg dry ND 51 ND 230 - - -- <230 Total Cyanide Plant 1 Cake mg/kg dry 2.7 13.1 IND 12.7 - - - -- 2.1 Plant 2 Cake mg/kg dry ND 12.5 -- - - IND 12.3 -- 3.3� Cormsivity Plant 1 Cake - NEG - -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- NEGI Plant Cake - NEG - - - - - - - NEG Nitrate Plants Cake mg/kg dry ND 6.8 - - - -- -- - - - - <6.8 Plant 2 Cake mg/kg dry ND 5.6 � -- -- - -- - - -- 11 Ammonia Nitrogen Plant 1 Cake mg/kg dry 6350 1500 6250 1600 6550 1600 6150 1300 6350 1500 6500 1500 6,300 Plant 2 Cake mglkg dry 5050 1300 4700 1200 5050 1200 5300 1200 5100 1200 ]800 1300 5,300 Organic Nitrogen Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry 54150 - 55250 -- 58450 -- 51350 -- 50150 = 54500 -- 54,000 Plant2 Cake mgBg dry 52450 - 50300 - 45450 -- 45200 - 42400 40700 - 45,000 Organic Lead Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry ND .11 -- - - -- ND .28 -- - - - <0.28 Plant 2 Cake mglkg dry NO .094 -- - - -- NO .26 -- -- - -- <0.26 pH Plant 1 Cake pH units 7.92 7 -- -- 7.9 A -- - -- 7.8 Cake Plant 2 e pH units ].8181 1.1 1.. 8 1 - - - 7.8 Sulfide Plants Cake mglkg dry I3400 250 - - - -- - - - 3,400 Plant 2 Cake mglkg dry 12000 200 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- 6,100 TKN Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry 60500 7600 161500 1311 65000 7800 57500 6700 56500 7500 61000 7400 60,000 Plant2 Cake Plant tlry 5]500 6200 55000 5800 50500 6200 50500 6100 47500 6000 48500 6300 50,000 Total Solids Plants Cake % 17 .05 16 OS 16.5 05 19 .OS 1Z .OS 17 .05 17 Plant 2 Cake % 20 .05 21 OS 20.5 OS 27 1.05 21 .OS 20.5 .05 21 Trace Elements Fluoride Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry 137 31 -- -- 36 Plant 2 Cake mglkg tlry 33 26 -- - 33 Potassium Plant 1 Cake mgxg dry I1400 310 -- - - - -- - - - - - 1300 Plant 2 Cake mg/kg dry 1000 250 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 950 Mercury Plant 1 Cake mg/kg dry .815 .12 .125 13 935 13 865 11 815 12 1.005 12 0.89 Plant 2 Cake mglkg dry .935 .099 72 .096 1.15 099 .52 .098 .88 .096 .815 1 0.88 Antimony Plant 1 Cake mglkg tlry ND 12 -- - - - 2.6 11 - 3.5 Plant Cake m9lk9 dry 1.8 10 -- - - -- 3.1 9.1 -- - - - 2.9 Arsenic Plant Cake mg/kg dry 17.95 119 167 2 i7.55 1.9 6.7 1.6 7.15 1.8 7.65 1.8 7.6 Plant 2 Cake mgxg dry 7.5 1.5 5.6 1.4 SM I1.5 7.15 11.5 16.4 11.4 16.25 1.5 7.5 Barium Plant 1 Cake mgNg dry 1520 16.2 1-- - - - 500 5.4 -- - - -- 490 Plant Cake mglkg dry 970 5 -- - - - 810 4.6 -- - - -- 970 Beryllium Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry ND 1.62 -- - - - IND .54 -- - - -- <0.62 Page 2 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 2 Cake EPA6010B mglkg dry ND .dd -- -- -- -- NO AT-T- - -- -� Cadmium Plants Cake EPA6010B mglkgdry 11.6 1.1 1.8 2.3 2.4 1.1 J1.25 1.2 1.3 1.2 2.85 2.5� Plant Cake EPA 6010B mglkgtlry 2.3 .9 2.9 1.8 3.1 .93 2.15 .9] 2 99 3.05 2 Chromium 1.6 5 Plant 2 aka EPA6010B mglkg dry 345 3.6 33.5 7.3 68.6667 3.7 555 3.9 44 4 47 18.2 Cobalt Plants Cake EPA 6010B mglkgdry 12.9 5.7 -- -- - - 3.2 5.9 - - ---- Plant Cake EPA6010B mglkg tlry 3.1 4.4 -- - - 3.6 4.7 - Copper Plants Cake EPA6010B mglkg dry 385 2.8 440 5.7 450 2.8 475 3 405 3.1 450 6.1 Plant 2 Cake EPA 6010B mglkg dry 405 2.3 .1 4.5 490 2.3 520 2.4 455 2.5 460 5.1 Iran Plant 1 Cake EPA 6010B mglkg dry 55000 34 46600 69 55000 34 64500 35 57500 37 70000 74 Plant 2 Cake EPA6010B mglkg dry 64500 27 61500 55 68500 28 70500 29 69000 30 71000 161 Lead Plant ake EPA6010B mglkg tlry 9.1 I11 BA I23 10.4 11 I13.5 12 8.65 12 8.25 '25 Plant 2 Cake EPA 6010B mglkg dry 9.7 9 10.15 18 11.5 9.3 14.5 9.7 11 9.9 9.65 20 Magnesium Plant Cake EPA 6010B mglkg dry4450 57 3300 1110 13650 156 4750 59 4650 62 5200 120 Plant ake EPA6010B mglkgtlry INN 88 5200 91 5500 146 15850 49 6050 50 5750 100 Molybdenum Plant ake EPA6010B mglkgdW 112 15.7 11.25 11 12 5.6 14.5 5.9 12.5 6.2 15 112 Plant 2 Cake EPA 6010B mglkgdry Ill 4.5 12.5 9.1 13.5 4.8 15.5 4.9 15 16 16 110 Nickel Plants Cake EPA 6010B mglkg dry 43.5 11 28.5 23 30.5 11 35.5 12 34 12 3 25 Plant 2 Cake EPA6010B mglkg dry 41 9 31 18 32.5 9.3 30.5 9.7 I28.5 9.9 32 20 Phosphorus Plants Cake EPA6010B mglkg dry 33000 91 -- - - - -- - - -- - Plant 2Cake EPA6010B mglkg dry 126000 171 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- Selenium Plant Cake EPA6010B mglkg dry 19.65 12.8 9.8 5.7 9.05 2.8 10.45 3 4.4 3.1 9.3 6.1 Plant 2 Cake EPA6010B mglkg dry 9.4 4.4 7.6 4.5 8.35 2.3 10.35 2.4 5.45 2.5 8.8 5.1 Silver Plant 1 Cake EPA6010B mglkg dry 4.65 1.7 4.85 3.4 5.95 1.7 5.75 1.8 5.1 1.9 5.9 3.7 Plant Cake EPA 6010B mglkg dry 5 14 5.6 2.7 6.5 �1.4 4.85 1.5 5.15 1.5 4.8 3.1 Thallium Plant 1 Cake EPA6010B mglkg dry ND 17 -- -- -- - ND 18 -- Plant 2 Cake EPA6010B mglkg dry NO 13 -- -- - - 1 14 - - - Vanadium Plant Cake EPA6010B mglkg dry 28 5.] _- -- _ = 125 5.9 = Plant Cake EPA 6010B mglkg dry 58 4.4 49 4.7 Zinc Plant Cake EPA 6010B mglkg dry 535 4.6 Soo 9.2 560 4.5 --[6H 4.7 535 5 630 9.8 Plant 2 Cake EPA6010B mgNg dry 615 3.6 635 7.3 730 3.7 760 3.9 695 4 720 8.2 TCLP-Trace Elements Mercury Plant Cake EPA]4]0 mgA- ND .002 _- TCLP I) Plant 2 Cake EPA 1470A- mgA- ND 002 TCLP(1311) Arsenic Plant l Cake EPA60316) mgA- ND .2 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA 6010B- mgA- ND .2 - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) Page 3 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Wosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant 2 Cake mg/kg dry ND .5 -- - - -- ND .46 -- -- - Cadmium Plant 1 Cake mg/kg dry 3.1 1.2 2.55 1.3 3.55 1.3 8.1333 1.1 5.95 1.2 14.15 1.2 3.0 Plant2 Cake mg/kg dry 3.45 1 3.55 .95 4.5 199 6.0667 .98 6.65 .96 5.15 1 3.1 Chromium Plants Cake mg/kg dry 145.5 4.9 29.5 15.3 138 15 139.6 14.3 34 4.8 35 14.8 46 Plant 2 Cake mg/kg dry 43.5 4 40 13.8 142.5 4 39 3.9 39 3.9 40 4.1 M Cobalt Plant 1 Cake mg/kg dry NO 6.2 -- �� -- NO 5.4 -- -- -- -- 3.1 Plant2Cake mg/kg dry ND 5 ND 4.6 Copper Plants Cake mg/kg dry 490 I3.1 13" I33 I515 3.1 485 2.7 "0 3 420 3 450 Plant 2 Cake mg/kg dry 505 2.5 475 14 510 2.5 490 2.4 530 2.4 485 2.5 40 Iran Plant 1 Cake mg/kg dry 61500 37 4900 40 62500 38 8000 32 7250 36 67000 36 62,0000 Plant 2 Cake mg/kg dry 66000 30 11111 29 63000 30 6600 29 7050 29 75000 30 88,000 Lead Plant Cake mg,gg dry 8.6 12 7.9 13 i15 13 11 11 13.5 12 18.65 12 10 Plant 2 Cake mglkg dry 9.1 10 12 9.5 13.5 9.9 13 9.8 14.5 9.6 112.5 10 1 12 Magnesium Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry 5450 62 5100 67 4250 63 6150 54 5550 160 14900 60 1 4800 Plant Cake mgBg dry 5850 50 5700 48 6000 50 560 49 640 148 16550 51 1 5800 Molybdenum Plant Cake mglkg tlry 115.5 6.2 112 16.7 21 6.3 16 5.4 14.5 fi 13.5 �6 1/ Plant 2 Cake mglkgdry 17 5 14.5 4.8 17 5 15.5 4.9 15 4.8 15 5.1 15 Nickel Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry 138.5 112 125 13 36.5 13 30 11 26.5 12 127 12 33 Plant 2 Cake mglkg dry 29.5 10 130 9.5 35 9.9 29.5 9.8 131.5 9.6 126.5 10 31 Phosphorus Plant 1 Cake mg/kg dry 34000 99 - - -- - 34,000 Plant Cake mg/kg dry 31000 8 -- - -- -- - -- - - -- 29,000 Selenium Plant 1 Cake mg/kg dry 7.95 3.7 9.3 3.3 875 3.1 8.05 2.7 8.6 3 5.35 3 8A Plant 2 Cake mg/kg dry 7.8 2.5 6.7 2.4 8.25 2.5 6.9 2.4 fi 2.4 3]5 2.5 7.4 Silver Plant 1 Cake mgBg dry 6.2 1.9 3 7 2 5 1.9 5.6 1.6 5.3 1.8 5.2 1.8 5.3 Plant 2 Cake mglkg dry 5.65 1.5 4.5 1.4 5.8 1.5 6.55 LS 6.75 1.4 15.4 11.5 1 5.5 Thallium Plant l Cake mg/kg dry IND jig -- - - -- NO 16 -- - - -- <19 Plant 2 Cake mglkg dry ND 15 - - -- ND 14 - - 1.0 Vanadium Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry I25 I8.2 -- - - -- 23 15.4 I-- - - -- 25 Plant 2 Cake mg/kg dry 48 5 -- - - -- 44 4.6 -- - - -- 50 Zinc Plant 1 Cake mg/kg dry 665 4.9 545 5.3 700 5 670 4.3 60 4.8 610 4.8 80 Plant 2 Cake mglkg tlry 785 4 725 3.8 750 4 735 3.9 70 3.9 755 4.1 720 TCLP-Trace Elements Mercury Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .02 _- _ _ _- _- - - - <0.0020 Plant Cake mgA- ND .02 - - - <0.0020 Arsenic Plant 1 Cake mgA- IND 1.2 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.20 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .2 -- - - -- -- - -- - - - <0.20 Page 4 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Barium Plant Cake EPA 6010B- mgl .32 .2 -- -- - - - -- - - - - TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA 6010B- mg& .47 1.2 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(13H) Cadmium Plant Cake EPA6010B- mgl ND .1 -- -- - - - -- - - - - TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA6010B- mglL ND .1 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) Chromium Plant Cake EPA6010B- mgl ND .1 -- -- - - - -- - - - - TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA6010B- mglL ND .1 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) Lead Plant 1 Cake EPA6010B- mgl ND .1 -- -- - - - -- - - - - TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA6010B- mglL ND .1 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) Selenium Plant 1 Cake EPA6010B- mgl .13 .1 -- -- - - - -- - - - - TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA6010B- mg& .12 .1 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) Silver Plant 1 Cake EPA6010B- mgl ND .2 -- -- - - - -- - - - - TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA6010B- mg& ND .2 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) STLC-Trace Elements Antimony Plant 1 Cake EPA6010B- mgl ND .2 -- -- - - - -- - - - - STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA6010B- mg& ND .2 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- STLC Arsenic Plant 1 Cake EPA6010B- mgl ND .2 -- -- - - - -- - - - - STLC Plant Cake EPA 6010B- mglL ND .2 - — — - STLC Barium Plant 1 Cake EPA6010B- mgl ] .2 — — — — — -- — — -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA6010B- mg& 121 -- STLC Beryllium Plant 1 Cake EPA6010B- mgl ND .OB — — — — — — — — — -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA6010B- mgl ND .OB — — — — — — — — — -- STLC Cadmium Plant 1 Cake EPA6010B- mgl ND .1 — — — — — — — — — -- STLC Plant Cake EPA6010B- mgl ND .1 — — — — — — — — — -- STLC Chromium Plant 1 Cake EPA6010B- mgl .47 .1 — — — — — — — — — -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA6010B- mg& .65 .1 — — — — — — — — — STLC Cobalt Plant l Cake EPA6010B- mgl ND -- STLC Page 5 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual UnRs Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Barium Plant Cake mgA- .19 .2 -- - - -- -- - -- - - - 0.26 Plant 2 Cake mglL .47 1.2 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- 0.47 Cadmium Plant Cake�D .1 -- - - -- -- - -- - - - 10.10 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .1 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - - <0.10 Chromium Plant Cake mgA- ND .1 - - - -- -- - -- - - - <0.10 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .1 -- - - -- -- -- -- - - - <0.10 Lead Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .1 - - - -- -- - - - - - <0.10 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .1 -- - - -- -- -- - - - - <0.10 Selenium Plant 1 Cake mglL ND .1 - - - - - - - - - - 0.13 Plant 2 Cake mglL ND .1 -- - - -- -- - - - - - 0.12 Silver Plant 1 Cake mglL ND .2 - - - - - - - - - - <0.20 Plant 2 Cake mglL ND .2 -- - - -- -- -- -- - - - <0.20 STLC-Trace Elements Antimony Plant 1 Cake mgA- .15 .2 - - - - - - - - - - 0.15 Plant 2 Cake mglL .15 .2 -- - - -- -- -- - - - - 0.15 Arsenic Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .2 - - - - - - - - - - <0.20 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10.20 Barium Plant 1 Cake mgA- 6.5 .2 - - - - - - - - - - 6.8 JI Plant 2 Cake mgA- 8.9 .2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15 Beryllium Plant 1 Cake mgA- NO .08 - - - - - - - - - - <0.080 Plant Cake mgA- NO .08 - - - - - - - - - - <0.080 Cadmium Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .1 - - - - - - - - - - <0.10 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .1 - - - - - - - - - - <0.10 Chromium Plant 1 Cake mgA- 57 .1 - - - - - - - - - - 0.52 Plant 2 Cake mglL .56 .1 -- - - -- -- - - - - - 0.61 Cobalt Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .2 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.20 Page 6 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 2 Cake EPA601013- mgA- ND .2 -- -- -- — �— -- -- — -- -- STLC Copper Plant 1 Cake EPA6010B- mglL ND .2 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA6010121- mgA- NO _�.2 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- STLC Lead Plant Cake EPA60101§- mglL NO .1 — -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA601013- mglL NO .1 -- -- — — — -- -- — -- -- STLC Mercury Plant 1 Cake EPA7470A- mg/- NO .002 — — — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA7470A- mglL -- STLC Molybdenum Plant 1 Cake EPA601015- mglL .11 .4 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA 601013- M91L 12 4 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- STLC Nickel Plant 1 Cake EPA601015- mglL .75 .2 — -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA 601013- mglL .85 .2 -- STLC Selenium Plant 1 Cake EPA601015- mglL 1.3 .2 — — — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA 601013- MCA. .29 .2 -- -- — — — -- -- — -- -- STLC Silver Plant Cake EPA601013- rngl ND .2 — — — — — -- — — -- -- � STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA601013- mglL NO .2 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Thallium Plant Cake EPA601012- mg& ND .2 — -- — — — -- — — -- --� STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA601013- mglL NO .2 -- -- — — — -- — — -- STLC Vanadium Plant 1 Cake EPA601012- mg& 1.44 .2 — — — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA601013- mglL 1.2 1.2 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Zinc Plant Cake EPA601012- mg& 6.4 .4 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- � STLC Plant 2 Cade EPA601013- mglL 5.5 4 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- STLC Volatile Organic Compounds 1,1,1,2-Tetmchlomethane Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry IND 1140 — 1-- ND 2700 NO 2900 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B Pglkg dry ND 1110 — -- ND 2200 NO 2400 — — -- -- 1,1,1-Tdchloroethane Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B Pglkg dry ND 157 = -- NO 1100 NO 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260B Pgdg dry ND 143 ND 890 NO 940 — — 1,1,2,2-Telrachlomethane Plant aka EPA8260B Pglkg dry NO 43 -- NO 890 NO 940 — — -- -- 1,1,2-Tdchlomethane Page 7 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant 2 Cake mglL AND .2 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.20 Copper Plant 1 Cake mgA- NO 2 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <0.20 Plant 2 Cake mglL ND .2 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.20 Lead Plant Cake mglL ND I.7 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - - <0.10 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .7 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.10 Mercury Plant 1 Cake mglL ND .002 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.0020 Plant 2 Cake mglL ND .002 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0020 Molybdenum Plant Cake mg/L .07 .4 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- 0.090 Plant 2 Cake mgA- .073 .4 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.10 Nickel Plant 1 Cake mglL .43 .2 -- �- -- -- -- - - - -- 0.59 Plant 2 Cake mglL .25 .2 -- - - -- -- -- -- - -- -- 0.55 Selenium Plant 1 Cake mglL ND .2 -- - - -- - - - - - - 0.30 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .2 -- -- -- -- -- - -- - -- - 0.29 Silver Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .2 -- - - -- -- - - - - - 10.20 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO 2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- - <0.20 Thallium Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .2 -- - - -- -- -- - - - - <0.20 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO 2 -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- - <0.20 Vanadium Plant 1 Cake mgA- .37 .2 -- - - -- -- - -- - - - 0.41 Plant 2 Cake MA .82 2 -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- - 1.0 Zinc Plant l Cake mgA- 2.7 .4 - - - - -- - - - - - 4.6 Plant 2 Cake mgA- .23 4 -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.9 Volatile Organic Compounds 1,1,1,2-Tetmchlomethane Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 150 - - NO 130 - - - - <2900 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 130 -- -- - -- IND 110 -- -- -- -- <2400 1,1,1-Tdchloroethane Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 80 -- -- - IND 52 -- - - -- <1200 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 50 - - - -- NO 44 - - - <940 1,1,2,2-Tetmchlomethana Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 60 - - - ND 52 - - - <1200 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 150 -- - - -- NO 144 -- -- -- -- <940 1,1,2-Tdchloroethane Page 8 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Methad Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pg/kg dry NO 57 -- -- ND 1100 AND 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry ND 43 -- -- ND 890 NO 940 — — -- — 1,1-Dichloroethane Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pg/kg dry ND 57 -- -- ND 1100 NO 1200 — — Plant 2Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry NO 43 -- -- ND 890 NO 940 — — -- 1,1-Dichlorcethene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry NO 140 -- -- ND 2700 NO 2900 �-- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B Pglkg dry ND 110 — -- ND 2200 NO 2400 — — -- 1,1-Dichloropropene Plants Cake EPA8260B Pglkg dry ND 140 — -- ND 1100 NO 1200 — Plant 2Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry ND 14 -- -- ND 890 NO 940 — — -- 12,3-Tdchlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry NO 140 -- -- ND 2700 NO 2900 — Plant 2Cake EPA8260B Pg/kg dry ND 1110 1. ND 2200 NO 2400 — — -- 1,2,3-Trichlompropane Plants Cake EPA8260B Pg/kg dry ND 280 -- ND 5400 NO 5900 — — Plant 2Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry NO 220 -- -- ND 4500 NO 4700 — — -- -- 12,4-Tdchlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry NO 140 -- ND 2700 NO 2900 = _ Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B Pg/kg dry ND Ill0 ND 2200 NO 2400 1,2,4-Tdmethylbenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B Pglkg dry ND 5] — -- ND 1100 NO 1200 — — Plant 2Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry NO 43 -- -- ND 890 NO 940 — — 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry NO 140 -- ND 2700 NO 2900 = _ Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B Pg/kg dry ND 110 ND 2200 NO 2400 1,2-Dibromcethane Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B Pg/kg dry ND 51 — -- ND 1100 NO 1200 — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260E pg/kg dry ND 43 -- -- ND 890 NO 940 — — -- -- 1,2-Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260E pg/kg dry NO 57 -- -- ND 1100 NO 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry ND 43 — ND 890 NO 940 — — 1,2-Dichlorcethane Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry ND 57 -- — ND 1100 NO 1200 — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry ND 43 -- -- ND 890 NO 940 — — -- -- 1,2-Dichloropropane Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry NO 57 -- -- NO 1100 NO 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B Pg/kg dry ND 43 -- -- ND 890 NO 940 — — -- 1,3,5-Tdchlombenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry — — -- -- ND 2200 NO 2400 — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry -- -- -- -- ND 1800 NO 1900 — — -- -- 1,3,5-Tdmethylbenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry NO 57 -- -- ND 1100 NO 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry ND 143 -- -- NO 890 NO 940 — — -- -- 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry IND 15] -- -- NO 1100 NO 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry IND 143 -- -- ND 890 NO 940 — — -- -- 1,3Dichloropropane Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry ND 57 -- -- ND 1100 NO 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry ND 43 -- -- NO 890 NO 940 — — -- -- 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry IND 15] -- -- ND 1100 NO 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry IND 143 -- -- ND 890 NO 940 — — -- -- 2,2-Dichloropropane Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260E pg/kg dry N7 -- -- ND 2200 NO 12400 — — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry ND 43 -- -- ND 1800 NO 1900 — — -- -- 2-Chlorotoluene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry ND 1140 -- -- ND 2700 NO 2900 -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260E pg/kg dry ND 110 -- -- ND 2200 NO 2400 -- -- 2-Hexanone Page 9 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Bicsolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry ND 60 -- - - -- NO 52 -- -- - -- <1200 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry ND 150 -- — — — ND 44 -- - - - <940 1,1-Dichloroethane Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry ND '60 -- — — — NO 52 — — — — <1200 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry ND 50 -- -- -- -- NO 44 -- -- -- -- <940 1,1-Dichlorcethene Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 150 -- -- -- -- NO 130 -- -- - -- <2900 Plant Cake pg/kg dry ND 130 -- — — — NO 110 I— I— _ <2400 1,1-Dichloropropene Plants Cake Pg/kg dry ND 60 -- — — — ND 52 — <1200 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 50 -- -- -- -- NO 144 -- - - -- <940 12,3-Tdchlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 150 -- -- -- -- ND 130 -- -- -- -- <2900 Plant Cake Pg/kg dry ND 130 -- — — — ND 110 — — — — <2400 1,2,3-Trichlompropane Plants Cake Pg/kg dry ND 300 — — — — ND 1260 — — — <5900 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 250 -- -- -- -- NO 220 -- - - -- <4700 12,4-Tdchlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 150 -- -- -- -- NO 130 -- -- -- -- <2900 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 130 — — — — NO 110 — — — — <2400 1,2,4-Tdmethylbenzene Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 60 -- — — — NO 52 — — — — <1200 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry 36 50 -- - - -- NO 44 -- -- -- -- 36 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 150 -- - - -- ND 130 -- -- -- -- <2900 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 130 -- - - -- NO 110 -- - - - <2400 1,2-Dibromcethane Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND 60 -- — — -- ND 52 -- — — — <1200 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry ND 50 -- - - -- IND 144 -- - - -- <940 1,2-Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 60 -- - - -- ND 52 -- - - -- <1200 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 50 IND 44 — — — <940 1,2-Dichlorcethane Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND 60 — — NO 52 1200 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 50 -- - - -- ND 44 -- - - -- <140 1,2-Dichloropropane Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 60 -- — — -- ND 52 -- _ — -- <1200 Plant 2 Cake Pglkg dry ND 50 — — ND 44 — — <940 1,3,5-Tdchlombenzene Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND I60 -- — — ND 52 — — <2A00 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry ND 50 — — -- ND 144 -- - - -- <1900 1,3,5-Tdmethylbenzene Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 60 IND 152 -- - - -- <1200 Plant 2 Cake Pglkg dry ND 50 IND 144 -- - - - <940 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND 60 IND 52 — — — — <1200 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 50 IND 44 -- -- -- -- <940 1,3Dichloropropane Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 60 IND 152 -- - - -- <1200 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 50 -- — — — ND 44 -- - - - <940 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 60 IND 152 -- — — — <1200 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 50 IND 144 -- - - -- <940 2,2-Dichloropropene Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 60 IND 152 -- - - -- <2400 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 50 IND 144 -- - - -- <1900 2-Chlorotoluene Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 1150 IND 1130 — — -- <2900 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry ND 1130 -- - - IND 1110 -- - - -- <2400 2-Hexanone Page 10 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Methad Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pg/kg dry -- - -- -- ND 14000 NO 15000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry -- -- -- ND 11000 NO 12000 — — -- — 4-Chlorotoluene Plant Cake EPA 8260B pg/kg dry ND 140 -- -- NO 2700 NO 2900 -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B pg/kg dry ND 1110 -- -- NO 2200 NO 2400 — — -- -- ACETONITRILE Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pg/kg dry NO 1100 --- -- -- -- -- _ -- -- Plant2 Cake EPA8260B Pglkg dry ND 860 -- - - - - -- -- Acrolein Plant Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry ND 2800 -- -- ND 54000 NO 59000 — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry NO 2200 -- -- ND 45000 NO 47000 — -- -- Acrylonitrile Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry NO 2800 ND 54000 NO 59000 — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B Pglkg dry ND 2200 ND 45000 NO 47000 — — -- -- Benzene Plant Cake EPA8260B Pglkg dry ND 5] ND 1100 NO 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry NO 143 -- ND 890 NO 940 — — -- -- Bromobenaene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry NO 140 ND 2700 NO 2900 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B Pglkg dry ND 110 -- ND 2200 NO 2400 — — -- — Bromochloromethane Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B Pg/kg dry ND 140 ND 2700 NO 2900 — — -- — Plant 2Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry NO 110 -- ND 2200 NO 2400 — — -- -- Bromodichloromethane Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry NO 57 ND 1100—ND 1200 — — -- -- Plant2Cake EPA8260B Pglkg dry ND 43 -- ND 890 NO 940 — — -- — Bromofonn Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B Pglkg dry ND 140 ND 2700 NO 2900 — — — — Plant 2Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry ND 110 -- -- ND 2200 NO 2400 -- -- -- -- Bra momethane Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry NO 140 ND 2700 No 2900 -- - -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B Pg/kg dry ND 1110 - 1. ND 2200 NO 2400 — — -- Carbon tetrachloride Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry ND 140 -- -- ND 2700 NO 2900 — — -- Plant 2 Cake EPA 8260B pg/kg dry NO 1110 ND 2200 No 2400 — — -- -- Chlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry NO 57 ND 1100 No 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B pg/kg dry ND 143 - 1. ND 890 ND 940 — — -- Chlomethane Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pg/kg dry ND 140 -- ND 2700 NO 2900 — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry NO 110 -- -- ND 2200 No 24Do — — -- -- Chloroform Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pg/kg dry NO 57 ND 1100 No 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry ND 143 — -- ND 890 NO 940 — — -- -- Chloromethane Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry IND 1140 ND 2700 NO 2900 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry IND 1110 — -- ND 2200 NO 2400 — — -- -- cis-1,2-Dichloroethene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry NO 57 ND 1100 NO 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260B Pg/kg dry ND 143 — -- ND 890 NO 940 — — -- -- cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B Pg/kg dry IND 157 — -- ND 1100 NO 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry ND 143 — -- ND 890 NO 940 — — -- -- Dibromochloromethene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry NO 157 — — IND 1100 NO 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B Pg/kg dry ND 143 — — ND 890 NO 940 — — -- -- Dibromomethane Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry ND I57 — — IND 1100 NO 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry ND 43 — — ND 890 NO 940 — — -- -- Page 11 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry NO 750 -- - - -- 500 650 -- -- - -- 500 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry NO 630 -- — — — NO 550 — — — — <12,000 4-Chlorotoluene Plant Cake pglkg dry NO 1150 -- — — — NO 130 — — — — <2900 Plant 2 Cake Pglkg dry NO 130 -- -- -- -- NO 110 -- -- - -- <2400 ACETONITRILE Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - <1100 Plant Cake pg/kg dry - — — — — — - <860 Acrolein Plant Cake pg/kg dry ND 3000 — — — — NO 2600 -- — — — <59,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 2500 -- -- -- -- NO 2200 -- -- -- -- <47,000 Acrylonitrile Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 3000 -- -- -- -- NO 2600 -- -- -- -- <59,000 Plant Cake Pg/kg dry NO 2500 — — — — NO 2200 -- — — — <47,000 Benzene Plant Cake Pg/kg dry NO 60 -- — — — NO 152 -- - - - <1200 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry NO 50 -- -- -- -- NO 44 -- -- -- -- <940 Bromobenzene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 150 -- -- -- -- NO 130 -- -- -- -- <2900 Plant 2 Cake Pgrkg dry NO 130 — — — — ND 110 -- - - - <2400 Bromochloromethane Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 1150 -- — — — NO 1130 — <2900 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry NO 1130 -- -- -- -- NO 1110 -- - - -- <2400 Bromodichloromethane Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 60 -- -- -- -- NO 52 — -- <1200 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 50 -- — — — NO 44 -- -- - - <940 Bromofomi Plant 1 Cake Pgrkg dry NO 150 -- — — — NO 130 — — — — <2900 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry NO 130 -- -- -- -- NO 110 -- -- -- -- <2400 Bromomethame Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 150 -- -- -- -- NO 130 -- -- -- -- <2900 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry NO 130 -- — — — NO 110 -- - - - <2400 Carbon tetrachloride Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 1150 -- — — — NO 130 -- - - - <2900 Plant 2 Cake pgfkg dry NO 130 -- -- -- -- No 110 -- -- -- -- <2400 Chlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake pgfkg dry NO 60 -- -- -- -- NO 52 — -- <1200 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry NO 50 -- — — — NO 44 -- - - - <940 Chlo cethame Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 150 -- — — — NO 130 — — — — <2900 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry NO 130 -- -- -- -- NO 110 -- -- -- -- <2400 Chloroform Plant 1 Cake pg/k9 dry NO 60 -- -- - -- ND 52 -- - - -- <1200 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 50 — — — -- ND 44 -- - - - <940 Chlommethane Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 150 — — — 60 130 — — — — 60 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 130 -- — 200 110 -- -- -- -- 200 cis-1,2-Dichloroelhene Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 160 -- - - IND 152 -- - - -- <1200 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 150 -- - - -- ND 144 -- - - - <940 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry NO 60 IND 152 I-- — — — <1200 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 50 -- - - -- NO 44 -- -- -- -- <940 Dibromochloromethene Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 60 -- — — — ND 52 -- — — -- <1200 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 50 -- — — — ND 44 -- -- - -- <940 Dibromomethame Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry IND 80 -- — — — ND 162 I-- - - -- <1200 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 50 -- — — — NO 44 -- - - -- <940 Page 12 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Dichlorodiguoromethane Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B Pgn g dry ND 140 -- ND 2700 NO 2900 — — — — Plant 2Cake EPA8260B Pglkg dry NO 1110 -- -- ND 2200 IND 2400 -- — -- -- Ethylbenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B Pglkg dry NO 57 -- -- ND 1100 NO 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B Pg/kg dry ND 43 -- -- ND 890 NO 940 — — -- — Hexachlorobutadiene Plants Cake EPA8260B Pg/kg dry ND 1140 -- ND 2700 NO 2900 — Plant 2Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry ND 1110 -- -- ND 2200 NO 2400 — — -- -- Isobutyl alcohol Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry ND 1400 -- -- ND 54000 NO 59000 - — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B Pg/kg dry ND 1100 ND 45000 NO 4]000 — -- -- Isopropylbenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B Pg/kg dry ND 57 -- -- NO 1100 NO 1200 — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry ND 43 -- -- NO 890 NO 940 — — -- -- m,p-Xylenes Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry ND 110 ND 2200 NO 2400 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry ND 86 -- ND 1800 NO 1900 — — -- Methyl ethyl ketone Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry 540 280 ND 11000 NO 12000 I- — -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260E pg/kg dry 2400 220 -- -- ND 8900 NO 9400 — — -- -- Methylene Chloride Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pg/kg dry ND 570 ND 11000 NO 12000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B Pg/kg dry ND 430 -- ND 8900 NO 9400 — — -- MIRK Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry ND 140 ND 5400 NO 5900 — — Plant 2Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry ND 110 -- -- ND 4500 NO 4700 — — -- -- Naphthalene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry ND 1140 — ND 2700 NO 29" — — � Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B Pg/kg dry ND 110 -- ND 2200 NO 2411 — — -- n-Butylbenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pg/kg dry ND 1140 — -- ND 2700 NO 2900 — — -- Plant 2 Cake EPA 8260E pg/kg dry NO 110 ND 2200 No 2400 — — -- -- n-Propylbenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry ND 57 ND 1100 No 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry ND 43 — NO 890 NO 940 — — -- o-Xylene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry ND 57 ND 1100 NO 1200 — — -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B pg/kg dry ND 143 -- -- ND 890 ND 940 — — -- -- seoButylbenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pg/kg dry ND 1140 -- -- ND 2700 NO 2900 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B pg/kg dry ND 110 -- -- ND 2200 NO 2400 — — -- -- Styrene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry ND 57 -- -- ND 1100 NO 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry ND 43 -- -- NO 890 NO 940 — — -- -- tert-Butylbenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260E pglkg dry ND 140 -- -- NO 2700 NO 2900 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry ND 110 -- ND 2200 NO 2400 — — -- -- Tetachloroethene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry IND 15] -- -- ND 1100 NO 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry IND 143 -- -- ND 890 NO 940 — — -- -- Toluene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pg/kg dry 1110 i57 ND 1100 NO 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry 134 143 — -- ND 890 NO 940 — — -- -- tans-1,2-Dichloroethene Plants Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry IND I57 -- -- ND 1100 NO 12 � 00 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260E pg/kg dry ND 43 -- -- ND 890 NO 94D — — -- -- tans-1,3-Dichloropropene Page 13 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Dichloro liguoromethane Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 150 — — — -- NO, 130 -- - - - 12900 Plant 2 Cake Pglkg dry ND 130 -- -- - -- NO 110 -- -- - -- <2400 Ethylbenzene Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND 60 -- -- -- -- NO 152 - <1200 Plant 2 Cake Pglkg dry ND 50 -- — — — ND 144 — — — c 940 Hexachlorobutediene Plants Cake Pglkg dry ND 150 -- — — — ND 130 — — — — 12900 Plant Cake pglkg dry NO 130 -- -- -- -- NO 110 -- -- -- -- <2400 Isobutyl alcohol Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 1500 -- -- -- -- NO 1300 -- -- -- -- <59,000 Plant Cake Pglkg dry ND 11300 — — — ND 1100 -- — — — <47,000 Isopropylbenzene Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND 60 — — — ND 52 — — — <1200 Plant2 Cake pglkg dry ND 50 -- - - -- ND 44 -- - - -. <940 m,p-Xylenes Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 120 -- - - -- ND 100 -- - -- - <2400 Plant 2 Cake Pgrkg dry ND 100 -- — — — ND 69 — — — <1900 Methyl ethyl ketone Plant 1 Cake Pgrkg dry ND 300 — — — -- 'f600 260 — — — 2,600 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry 930 250 -- - - -- NO 220 Methylene Chloride Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO -- - - -- ND 530 -- -- - -- <12,000 Plant 2 Cake Pgrkg dry ND 500 -- — — — ND 440 — — — <9400 MIBK Plant 1 Cake Pgrkg dry ND 150 -- ND 130 — — — — <5900 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry NO 130 -- — — ND 110 -- -- -- -- <4]00 Naphthalene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 150 -- - - -- NO 130 -- -- -- -- <2900 Plant 2 Cake Pglkg dry ND 1130 — — — ND 110 — — — — <2400 n-Butylbenzene Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND 150 — — — — ND 130 — — — — <2900 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry NO 130 -- - - -- NO 110 -- -- -- -- <2400 n-Propylbenzene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 160 -- - - IND 152 -- - - -- <1200 Plant 2 Cake Pglkg dry ND 150 — IND 144 — — — <940 o-Xylene Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND I60 — — — — ND 52 — — — <1200 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry IN 50 -- - - -- IND 44 -- -- -- -- <940 seoButylbenzene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 150 ---- — — ND I130 -- -- -- -- <2900 —Plant 2 Cake Pglkg dry ND 130 — — — ND ll0 -- - - - <2400 Styrene Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND I60 -- - - -- ND 52 -- - - - <1200 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry NO 50 -- -- -- -- NO 44 -- - - -- <940 tart-Butylbenzene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 150 -- -- -- -- NO 130 -- -- - -- <2900 Plant 2 Cake Pglkg dry ND 130 — — — — NO 110 — — — — <2400 Tetachloroethene Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND 160 -- — — — ND 52 — — — — <1200 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry NO ISO - — — -- NO 44 -- -- - -- <940 Toluene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry 43 160 — — — — 132 152 -- - - -- 62 Plant 2 Cake Pglkg dry ND 150 — — — — IND 144 -- - - -- 34 tans-1,2-Dichloroethene Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND 60 — — — — IND 152 -- -- - -- <1200 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry NO 50 — — — — IND 144 -- -- - -- <940 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Page 14 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Methad Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B pg/kg dry NO 57 -- -- ND 1100 AND 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry ND 43 -- -- ND 1890 NO 940 — — -- — Trichloroethene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pg/kg dry ND 57 -- -- ND 1100 NO 1200 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry ND -- -- ND 890 IND 940 — — -- -- Trichloro8uoromethane Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B pg/kg dry NO 140 -- -- ND 2700 NO 2900 — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B pglkg dry ND 110 — — ND 2200 NO 2400 — — -- -- Vinyl chloride Plants Cake EPA8260B Pglkg dry ND 140 -- — ND 2700 NO 2900 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8260B pglkg dry NO 110 -- -- ND 2200 NO 2400 — — -- -- TCLP-Volatile Organic Compounds 1,1,1,2-Tetrechloroethane Plant 1 Cake EPA 826013- mg/L ND .05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- — -- -- TCLP(ffi77) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B- mg/L ND 05 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) 1,1,1-Tnchloroethane Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B- mglL NO .02 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B- mg/L ND .02 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) 1,1,2,2-Tetrechloroethane Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B- mg/L NO .02 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260121- mg/L ND .02 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) 1,1,2-Tnchlomethane Plant 1 Cake EPA (l311) m9IL NO .02 TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B- m /L ND -- TCLP(1311) 1,1-Dichloroethane Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mg/L ND .02 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B- mgA- ND .02 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) 1,1-Dichloroethene Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mg/L ND .05 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260121- mg/L ND .05 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) 1,1-Dichloropropene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B- mg/L ND .02 -- -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8280B- mg/L ND .02 -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) 1,2,3-Tdchlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA 826013- mg/L NO .05 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260121- mg/L ND .05 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) 1,2,3-Trichloropropane Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B- mglL NO .1 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260121- mg/L ND .1 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) 1,2,4-Tdchlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA 826013- mg/L ND .05 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mg/L ND .05 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) 1,2,4-Tdmethylbenzene Page 15 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 60 -- — — -- NO 52 -- -- — -- <1200 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND I50 -- — — — ND _ 144 — — — <940 Trichloroethene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 60 -- — — — ND 52 — <1200 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 50 -- -- -- -- NO 44 -- — — -- <940 Trichlom0uoromethane Plant 1 Cake pg1kg dry NO 150 -- -- -- NO Il30 -- — — -- <2900 Plant Cake pg/kg dry ND 130 -- — — — NO 110 -- — — — <2100 Vinyl chloride Plants Cake pg/kg dry ND 150 -- — — — NO 130 — — — — <2900 Plant 2 Cake pg1kg dry NO 130 -- -- -- -- NO 110 -- -- -- -- <2400 TCLP-Volatile Organic Compounds 1,1,1,2-Tetrechlomethane Plant 1 Cake mg/L NO .0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .05 -- — — -- -- -- -- -- — -- <0.050 1,1,1-Tnchloroethane Plant 1 Cake mgA- NO .02 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .02 -- — — -- -- -- -- -- — -- <0.020 1,1,2,2-Tetrechlomethane Plant 1 Cake mgA. NO .02 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant 2 Cake mglL ND .02 -- — — -- -- -- -- -- — — <0.020 1,1,2-Tdchlomethane Plant 1 Cake mgA- NO .02 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .02 -- — — -- -- -- -- -- — — <0.020 1,1-Dichloroethane Plant 1 Cake mgA- NO .02 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .02 -- — — -- -- -- -- -- — — <0.020 1,1-Dichloroethene Plant l Cake mgA- NO .05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .05� — — -- -- -- -- -- — — <0.050 1,1-Dichloropmpene Plant Cake mgA- ND .02 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- — <0.020 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .02 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- — — — <0,020 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .05 T -- -- -- -- -- -- — — — <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- — — — <0,050 1,2,3-Trichloropropane Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .7 -- -- -- -- -- -- — — — — <0.10 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .1 -- -- -- -- -- — — — - <0.10 1,2,4-Tdchlorobenzene Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- -- -- -- -- — — — — — <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL ND .05 -- -- -- -- -- - -- - -- - <0.050 1,2,4-Tdmethylbennne Page 16 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mgI ND .02 -- -- -- — �— -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA82606- mgA- ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) 1,2-Dibromo-3chloropropane Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mgA- NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA82606- mgA- ND .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) 1,2-Dibromoethane Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mglL ND .02 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA82606- mgA- NO .02 -- -- -- -- — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mglL NO .02 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA82606- mglL ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — --�-- TCLP(1311) 1,2-Dichloroethane Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B- MCA. NO .02 -- -- -- — — -- -- — TCLP(1311) -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260121- mgA- ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) 1,2-Dichloropropane Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B- MCA. NO .02 -- -- -- — TCLP(1311) -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260121- mgA- ND .02 -- — — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) 1,35-Tdchlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B- mglL ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mglL ND .02 — — — — — — — — — -- TCLP(1311) 1,3,5-Tdmethylbenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mglL NO .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1317) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B- mgA- ND .02 — — — — — — — — — -- TCLP(1311) 1,1Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mglL NO .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mglL ND .02 — — — — — — — — — -- TCLP(1311) 1,1Dichloropropane Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mglL ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mglL ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) 1,1Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B- mglL ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mglL ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) 2,2-Dichloropropane Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B- mglL NO .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mglL ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) 2-Chlorotoluene Plant 1 Cake EPA 826013- mglL NO 1.05 — — — — — — — — — -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mgA- ND .OS -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) 4-Chlorotoluene Page 17 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual UnRs Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plants Cake mgA- ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.020 Plant Cake mgA- ND .02 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <0.020 1,2-Dibromo-3chloropropane Plants Cake mgI ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- 40.050 1,2-Dibromoethane Plant s Cake mg/L NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .02 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- 40.020 1,2-Dichlorobenzene Plant s Cake mg/L NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- 40.020 1,2-Dichloroethane Plant s Cake mgA- NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant Cake mglL ND .02 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.020 1,2-Dichloropropane Plant s Cake mgA- NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant Cake mglL ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.020 1,35-Tdchlorobenzens Plant s Cake mgA- NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant Cake mgA- ND .02 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.020 1,3,5-Tdmethylbenzene Plant Cake mglL NO .02 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant Cake mgA- ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.020 1,1Dichlorobenzene Plant Cake mglL NO 02 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant Cake mgA- NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.020 1,1Dichloropropane Plant Cake mglL NO 02 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant Cake mgA- ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 1,1Dichlorobenzene Plant Cake mgA- NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant Cake mglL ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 2,2-Dichloropropane Plant Cake mgA- NO 02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant Cake mgA- ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 2-Chlorotoluene Plant Cake mgA- NO 05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 4-Chlorotoluene Page 18 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Methad Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 1 Cake EPA 826013- mgI ND .05 -- -- -- — �— -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA82606- mgA- ND .06 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311 Acetone Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mgA- 1.92 .1 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B- mgA- 1.3 .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Acrolein Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mglL ND .6 -- -- -- -- — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA82606- mgA- NO .6 -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Acrylonitrile Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mgA. ND .6 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B- mgA- ND .6 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Benzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B- MCA. NO .02 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260121- mgA- ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Bromobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B- MCA. NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B- mgA- NO .06 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Bromochloromethane Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B- mgA- ND .06 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Bromodichloromethane Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mglL NO .02 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260121- mgA- ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Bromofonn Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- trig ND .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260121- mgA- ND .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Bromomemane Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260121- mgA- ND .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Carbon tetrachloride Plant 1 Cake EPA 826013- mglL ND .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B- mgd_ ND .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Chlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA 30B- mglL ND .02 -- -- — — — -- -- — -- -- TCLIxI 11) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B- mgA- ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Chloroemane Plant 1 Cake EPA 826013- mglL NO 1.05 — — — — — — — — — -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mgA- ND .0 6 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Chloroform Page 19 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Bicsolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Unbs Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plants Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - - -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <0.050 Acetone Plant 1 Cake mgA- .3 .1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.61 Plant 2 Cake mgA- .39 .1 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- 0.65 Acrolein Plant 1 Cake mg/L NO .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.50 Plant Cake mgA- ND .6 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.50 Acrylonitrile Plant 1 Cake mglL NO .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 Plant Cake mgA- ND .6 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- 40.50 Benzene Plant s Cake mgA- NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant Cake mglL ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Bromobenzene Plant s Cake mgA- NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- - -- - <0.050 Plant Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- - - - - <0.050 Bromochloromethane Plant s Cake mgA. NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- - <0.050 Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- - - - - <0.050 Bromodichloromethane Plant s Cake mgA- NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- - -- - <0.020 Plant Cake mgA- ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- - - - - <0.020 Bromofoon Plant 1 Cake mglL NO AS -- - - -- -- -- -- - -- - <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .05 -- - - -- -- - - - - - <0.050 Bromomemane Plant 1 Cake mglL NO AS -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Carbon tetrachloride Plant Cake mglL NO 05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Chlorobenzene Plant Cake mglL NO 02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant Cake mgA- ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Chloroemane Plant Cake mglL NO 05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Chloroform Page 20 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 1 Cake EPA 826013- mgI ND .02 -- -- -- — �— -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mgA- ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Chloromethane Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mgA- NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mgA- ND .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) cis-1,2-Dichloroethene Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mglL ND .02 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mgA- NO .02 -- -- -- -- — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mglL NO .02 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B- mgd_ ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Dibromochloromethane Plant 1 Cake EPA 826013- MCA. NO .02 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260121- mgA- ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Dibromomethane Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B- MCA. NO .02 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260121- mgA- ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Dichlorodigumomethane Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B- mgA- ND .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Ethylbencene Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mglL NO .02 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260121- mgA- ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Hexachlorobu adiene Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mglL ND .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B- mglL ND .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Isobutyl alcohol Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B- mglL NO .2 -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826012- mglL NO 2 TCLP(1311) Isopropylbenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mglL ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mglL NO .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) m,p-Xylenes Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B- mglL NO .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mglL NO .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Methyl ethyl ketone Plant 1 Cake EPA 826013- mglL .05 .1 — — — — — — — — — -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mglL .078 .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Methylene Chloride Page 21 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual UnRs Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plants Cake mgA- ND .02 -- - - - -- -- -- -- - -- <0.020 Plant Cake mglL ND .02 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <0.020 Chloromethane Plants Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- 40.050 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene Plant s Cake mg/L NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .02 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- 40.020 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Plants Cake mg/L NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .02 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- 40.020 Dibromochloromethane Plant s Cake mgA- NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant Cake mglL ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Dibromomethane Plant s Cake mgA- NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- - -- - <0.020 Plant Cake mglL ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- - - - - <0,020 DichlorodMuoromethane Plant s Cake mgA- NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- - <0.050 Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- - - - - <0.050 Ethylbencene Plant s Cake mglL NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- - -- - <0.020 Plant Cake mgA- ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- - - - <0.020 Hexachlorobutediene Plant 1 Cake mglL NO AS -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- - <0.050 Plant Cake mgA- NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- - - - <0.050 Isobutyl alcohol Plant 1 Cake mglL NO 2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -. <0.20 Plant Cake mgA- ND .2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - <0.20 Isopropylbenzene Plant Cake mglL NO .02 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - <0.020 Plant Cake mgA- ND .02 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - <0,020 m,p-Xylenes Plant Cake mglL NO 02 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - <0.020 Plant Cake mgA- NO .02 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - <0,020 Methyl ethyl ketone Plant l Cake mglL W 1 -- - - -- -- -- -- - - - 0.049 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - 0-028 Methylene Chloride Page 22 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B- mglL .019 .OS -- -- -- — �— -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA82606- mgA- 016 .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) MIBK Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mgA- ND .1 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant Cake EPA8260B- mgA- ND .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Naphthalene Plant 1 Cake EPA mg� .OS TCLP(l311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8 ND -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) n-Butylbenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mgA- ND .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) n-Propylbenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B- MCA. NO .02 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260121- mgA- ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) o-Xylene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B- MCA. NO .02 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260121- mgA- ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) _ sec,Butylbenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260B- mgA- ND .05 -- — — — -- — — --�-- TCLP(1311) Styrene Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mglL NO .02 -- — — -- -- — TCLP(1311) -- _-- -- _ -- Plant2 Cake TCLP(1301B) mgA- ND .02 tert-Butylbenzene Plant l Cake EPA (l311) mglL ND .OS -- -- — — — -- — — -- TCLP(1317) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260121- mgA- ND .05 — — — — — -- — — TCLP(1311) Tetrachloroethene Plant 1 Cake EPA8260B- mglL NO 1,12 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mgA- ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Toluene Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mglL ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8260121- mgA- ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) trans-1.2-Dichloroethene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B- mglL ND .02 -- -- -- — — TCLP(1311) -- — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA826013- mgA- ND .02 -- -- -- -- -- -- — -- -- -- TCLP(1311) trans-1.3-Dichloropropene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8260B- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mgA- NO .02 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- TCLP(1311) Trichloroethene Page 23 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Wosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plants Cake mgA- .012 .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- 0.016 Plant 2 Cake mglL .012 .05 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- 0.014 MIBK Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.10 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND d -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <0.10 Naphthalene Plant s Cake mg/L NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - - <0.050 n-Butylbenzene Plant s Cake mglL NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- - <0.050 Plant Cake mgA- ND .06 -- - - -- -- -- - - - - <0.050 n-Propylbenzana Plant s Cake mgA- NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- - -- - <0.020 Plant Cake mglL ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- - - - - <0.020 o-Xylene Plant s Cake mgA- NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- - -- - <0.020 Plant Cake mglL ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- - - - - <0.020 sec,Butylbenzene Plant s Cake mgA- NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- - <0.050 Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- - - - - <0.050 Styrene Plant s Cake mglL NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- - -- - <0.020 Plant Cake mgA- ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- - <0.020 tart-Butylbenzene Plant 1 Cake mglL NO AS -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Plant Cake mgA- NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Tetrachloroethane Plant Cake mglL NO 02 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant Cake mgA- ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Toluene Plant Cake mglL NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant Cake mgA- ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 trans-1.2-Dichloroethene Plant Cake mglL NO 02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Plant Cake mglL ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 trans-1.3-Dichloropropene Plant Cake mglL NO .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.020 Plant Cake mgA- ND .02 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.020 Trichloroethene Page 24 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Methad Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mgI ND .02 -- -- -- — �— -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mgA- ND .02 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Trichlom8uoromethane Plant 1 Cake EPA826013- mgA- NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA826013- mgA- ND .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Vinyl chloride Plant 1 Cake EPA 8280B- mgA. ND 05 -- -- -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) -- Plant 2Cake EPA8260B- mgA- ND .05 -- TCLP(1311) Semkvolatile Organic Compounds 1,2,4-Tnchlombenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry ND 43000 -- -- -- — NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 72000 -- — — — NO 18000 — — -- -- 1,2-Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 143000 1. NO 49000 — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry ND 72000 -- -- -- — NO 18000 — — -- -- 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 13000 -- -- ND 49000 -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 172000 — — NO 18000 — — -- — 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 43000 — — — — NO 49000 — Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry ND _]72000 -- -- -- — NO 18000 — — -- -- 2,4,5-Tnchlorophenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry NO 43000 -- -- -- — NO 49000 -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry ND 72000 — — — — NO 18000 — — -- — 2,4,6-Tnchlomphenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry ND 43000 — — — — NO 49000 — — — — Plant 2Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry NO 72000 -- -- -- -- No 18000 -- -- -- -- 2,1Dichlorophenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry ND 43000 -- -- -- -- No 49000 -- -- -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry ND 172000 — — — — NO 18000 — — — — 2,4-Dimethylphenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry ND j43000 — — — — NO 49000 — — — — Plant 2Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry NO 72000 -- -- -- — NO 18000 -- — -- -- 2,4Dinitrophenol Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pg/kg dry NO 86000 -- -- — — NO 98000 — — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 140000 -- — — — NO 35000 — — -- -- 2,4-Dinitrotoluene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 43000 - NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry ND 72000 -- -- — — ND 18000 — — -- -- 2,6-Dingrotoluene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 143000 -- -- — — NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 72000 — — — — NO 18000 — — -- -- 2-Chloronaphthalene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 143000 -- NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 72000 -- -- — — NO 18000 — — -- -- 2-Chlorophenol Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 43000 -- �� — NO 41000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry NO 7 2000 — — — — NO 18000 — — -- -- 2-Methytnaphthalene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 43000 — — — — NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry ND 72000 -- -- — — NO 18000 — — -- -- 2-Methylphenol Page 25 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Bicsolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant s Cake mg/L NO .02 -- - - - -- -- -- -- - -- <0.020 Plant 2 Cake mg/L ND .02 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <0.020 Trichlom0uoromethane Plants Cake mg/L ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mg/L ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- 40.050 Vinyl chloride Plant s Cake mg/L NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mg/L ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- 40.050 Semkvolatile Organic Compounds 1,2,4-Tdchlombenzene Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 41000 — — — — NO 11000 — — — — <T2,000 1,2-Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND 20000 — — — — NO 13000 — — — — <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- -- -- <T2,000 1,8-Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 41000 — — — — NO 11000 — — — — <T2,000 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 20000 — — — — NO 13000 — — — — <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- -- -- <T2,000 2,4,5-Tnchlorophenol Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant Cake Pg/kg dry ND 41000 — — — — NO 11000 — — — — <T2,000 2,4,6-Tnchlomphenol Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND 20000 — — — — NO 13000 — — — — <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- -- -- -- No 11000 -- -- -- -- <T2,000 2,1Dichlorophenol Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry ND 41000 — — — — NO 11000 — — — — <T2,000 2,4-Dimethylphenol Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry ND 20000 — — — — NO 13000 — — — — <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- - -- <T2,000 2,4Dinkrophenol Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- -- - -- NO 2600 — -- <98,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 82000 — — — -- ND 22000 -- — — — <10,000 2,4-DinRrotoluene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 20000 — _ 13000 — — — — <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- ND 11000 -- -- -- -- <T2,000 2,6-Dingrololuene Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 20000 -- _ _ -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 41000 — ND 11000 — — — — <T2,000 2-Chloronaphthalene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 20000 — _ _ _- ND 13000 — — — — <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- ND 11000 -- -- -- -- <T2,000 2-Chlorophenol Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 20000 -- _ _ — ND 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 41000 -- ND 11000 -- -- - -- <72,000 2-Methytnapluhalene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 20000 -- _ _ = ND 13000 -- -- - -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- NO 11000 -- -- - -- <T2,000 2-Methylphenol Page 26 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Methad Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry NO 43000 -- -- -- -- NO 49000 -- — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry ND 72000 — — NO 18000 — — -- — 2-Nitroaniline Plant Cake EPA 82700 pglkg dry ND 43000 -- -- — — NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry NO 172000 -- -- — — NO 18000 -- — -- -- 2-NRrophenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry ND 43000 -- -- -- — NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 172000 1.- — — — NO 18000 — — -- -- 3,3-Dichlorobenzidine Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry ND 110000 — — — — NO 120000 — — — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 180000 -- -- -- — NO 44000 -- — -- 3-Nitroaniline Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 43000 -- -- -- — NO 49000 -- — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry ND 72000 — — — — NO 18000 — — -- -- 4,6-DinRro-2-melhylphenol Plant Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry ND 55000 — — — — NO 62000 — -- — Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry ND 92000 -- -- -- -- NO 2200 — -- -- 4-Bromophenyt phenyl ether Plant 1 Cake EPA 827OC pg/kg dry NO 43000 -- -- -- — NO 4900� — -- -- Plant2Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry, ND 72000 -- NO 18000 — — 4-Chloro-3-metholphenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry, ND 43000 -- — — — NO 49000 — -- — Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pg/kg dry NO 72000 -- -- -- -- NO 18000 -- -- -- -- 4-Chlomaniline Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pg/kg dry NO 43000 -- -- -- -- NO 49000 -- — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry, ND 172000 -- — — — NO 18000 — — -- -J 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry, ND 43000 -- — — — NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 72000 -- -- -- — NO 18000 — — -- -- 4-Methylphenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry ND 43000 -- -- -- — NO 49000 -- -- -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry ND 72000 — — — — 57000 18000 — — — — 4-Nitroaniline Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry ND 1110000 — — — — NO 120000 — — — — Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry NO 180000 -- -- -- -- ND 44000 -- -- -- -- 4-NRrophenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry NO 110000 -- -- -- -- ND 120000 -- -- -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry, IND 180000 — — — — NO 44000 — — — — Acenaphthene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry, ND 143000 -- — — — NO 49000 — Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 172000 -- -- -- — NO 18000 — — -- -- Acena inthylene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 43000 -- -- — — NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry ND 72000 -- -- — — NO 18000 — — — -- Aniline � Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry ND 55000 -- I— I— I— NO 62000 — — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry ND 92000 NO 22000 — — -- -- Anth scene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 43000 -- -- NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry ND 72000 — — — NO 18000 — — — -- Azobenzene/1,2-Dipheny1hydrazine Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry ND 143000 — — — — NO 49000 Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry ND 72000 -- -- -- — NO 18000 — — -- -- Bero,a)anthracene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 43000 — — — — NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry ND 72000 — — — — NO 18000 — — -- -- Benzidine Page 27 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Bicsolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND 20000 -- - - -- NO 13000 -- -- - -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry ND 41000 - - - - NO 11000 - - - -- <72,000 2-Nkmaniline Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry ND 20000 - - - - NO 13000 - - - -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake Pglkg dry ND 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- - -- <72,000 2-NRrophenol Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant Cake Pg/kg dry ND 41000 - - - - NO 11000 - - - - <72,000 3,3-Dichloroloenzidine Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 51000 - - - - NO 33000 - - - - <120,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry NO 100000 -- -- -- -- NO 28000 -- -- -- -- <180,000 3-Nitroaniline Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant Cake pg/kg dry ND 41000 - - - - NO 11000 - - - - <72,000 4,6-Dinbc-2-methylphenol Plants Cake Pg/kg dry ND 26000 - - - - NO 17000 - - - - <62000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry NO 52000 -- -- -- -- NO 14000 -- -- -- -- <92000 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 41000 - - - - NO 11000 - - - - <72,000 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 20000 - - - - NO 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- -- -- <]2,000 4-Chloroaniline Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 41000 - - - - NO 11000 - - - - <72,000 4-Chloropheml phenyl ether Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 20000 - - - - NO 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- -- -- <]2,000 4-Methylphenol Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 41000 - - - - NO 11000 - - - - <72,000 4-Nitroaniline Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 51000 - - - - NO 33000 - - - - <120,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 100000 -- -- -- -- NO 28000 -- -- -- -- <180,000 4-NRrophenol Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 51000 -- -- -- -- NO 33000 -- -- -- -- <120,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 100000 - - - - NO 28000 - - - - <180,000 Acenaphthene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 20000 - - - - NO 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- -- -- <]2,000 Acenaphthylene Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 41000 - - - - ND 11000 - - - - <72,000 Aniline Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 26000 - - - -- ND 17000 -- - - - <62000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry ND 52000 -- - - 1-- ND 1140001-- 1- - -- <92000 Anlhracene Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 20000 -- - - -- IND 13000 -- -- - -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake PgVkg dry ND 41000 - - - - IND 11000 - - - - <72,000 Azoloenzene/1,2-Dipheny1hydrazine Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 20000 - - - - ND 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- - - -- NO 11000 -- -- - -- <12,000 Bero,a)anthrecene Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 20000 -- _ _ = ND 13000 -- -- - -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 41000 IND 11000 -- -- - -- <72,000 Benzidine Page 28 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Methad Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry ND 180000 -- -- -- -- NO 200000 -- — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry ND 290000 — — — — NO 71000 — — -- — Benzo(a)pyrane Plant 1 Cake EPA 82700 pglkg dry ND 43000 -- — — — NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C p9/kg dry NO 172000 -- -- — — NO 18000 — — -- -- Benardadfluoranthene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry NO 143000 -- -- -- — NO 49000 -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND ]2000 -- — — — IN 18000 — — -- -- Benzo(g,h,i)peMene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry ND J43000 — — — — NO 49000 — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry ND _72000 -- -- -- — NO 1B000 — — -- -- Benzo(k)luomnthene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 43000 -- -- -- — NO 4900)0::[—:::::: -- -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND ]2000 — — — — NO 18000 — — — — Benzoic acid Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 1110000 — — — — NO 120000 — — — — Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 1180000 -- -- -- — NO 44000 -- -- -- Benzyl alcohol Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 43000 -- -- -- — NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry ND 172000 1.- — — — NO 18000 — — -- Bis(2chlorcethoxy)methane Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry ND 43000 -- — — — NO 49000 — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pg/kg dry NO 72000 -- -- -- -- NO 18000 -- -- -- -- Bis(2chloroethyl)ether Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pg/kg dry NO 43000 -- -- -- -- NO 49000 -- — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 172000 -- — — — NO 18000 — — -- -J Bis(2chloroisopropyhether Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry ND 143000 -- — — — NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 172000 -- -- -- — NO 18000 — — -- -- Bis(2-aihylhexyl)phthalate Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry 38000 43000 -- -- -- — 62000 49000 -- -- -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry 42000 72000 — — — — 24000 18000 — — — — Butylbenzylphthalats Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry ND 143000 — — — — NO 49000 — — — — Plant 2Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry NO 172000 -- -- -- -- No 18000 -- -- -- -- Chrysene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry NO 43000 -- -- -- -- No 49000 -- -- -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry IND 172000 — — — — NO 18000 — — — — Dibenz(a,h)andmacene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry ND 155000 -- — — — NO 62000 — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 92000 -- -- -- — NO 22000 — — -- -- Dibenzofuran Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry ND 43000 -- -- — — NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry ND 72000 -- -- — — NO 18000 — — — -- Diethylphtnalate � Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry ND 43000 -- I— I— I— NO 49000 — — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 72000 -- -- — — ND 16000 — — -- -- Dimethylphihalate Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 43000 -- -- -- NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry IND 172000 — NO 18000 — — — -- Di-n-butyl phthalate Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry ND 143000 — — — — NO 49000 Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry ND 72000 -- -- -- — NO 16000 — — -- -- Di-n-odyl phthalate Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 43000 — — — — NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry ND 72000 — — — — NO 18000 — — -- -- Fluoanthene Page 29 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 83000 -- - - -- NO 53000 -- -- - -- <200,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry ND 170000 - - - - ND 45000 -- - - - <290,000 Benzo(a)pyrane Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry ND 20000 - - - - NO 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- - -- <T2,000 Benzo(b)fluoranthen Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 41000 - - - - NO 11000 - - - - <72,000 Benzo(g,h,i)peMene Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 20000 - - - - NO 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cak0 pglkg dry NO 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- -- -- <72,000 Benzo(kflumanthene Plant 1 Cak0 pglkg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant Cake pg/kg dry ND 41000 - - - - NO 11000 - - - - <72,000 Benzoic acid Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry ND 51000 - - - - NO 33000 - - - - <120,000 Plant 2 Cak0 pglkg dry NO 100000 -- -- -- -- NO 28000 -- -- -- -- <180,000 Benzyl alcohol Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 41000 - - - - NO 11000 - - - - <72,000 Bis(2chloroethoxy)n Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 20000 - - - - NO 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- -- -- <]2,000 Bis(2chloroethyl)ether Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 41000 - - - - NO 11000 - - - - <72,000 Bis(2chloroisopropyhether Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 20000 - - - - ND 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- -- -- <]2,000 Bis(2-eihylhexyl)phthalate Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry 40000 20000 -- -- -- -- 16000 13000 -- -- -- -- 39,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry 46000 41000 - - - - 18000 11000 - - - - 33,000 Butyl benzyl Phthalate Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 20000 - - - - ND 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- -- -- <]2,000 Chrysene Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 41000 - - - - ND 11000 - - - - <72,000 Dibenz(Ah)arthracene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 26000 - - - - ND 17000 - - - - <62000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry No 52000 -- -- -- -- ND 14000 -- -- - -- <92000 Dibenzofumn Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry No 20000 -- -- -- -- ND 13000 -- - - -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 41000 - - - - ND 11000 -- - - - <72,000 Diethyl Phthalate Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 20000 - - - -- ND 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry No 41000 -- - - 1-- IND 11000 -- -- -- -- <92,000 Dimethyl phthalate Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry No 20000 -- _ _ - ND 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 41000 - ND 11000 - - - - <72,000 Di-n-butyl Phthalate Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 20000 - - - - ND 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry No 41000 -- - - -- NO 11000 -- -- - -- <12,000 Di-n-oclyl phthalate Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry No 20000 = ND 13000 -- -- - -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 41000 -- ND 11000 -- -- - -- <T2,000 Fluoanthene Page 30 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2018 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry NO 43000 -- -- -- -- NO 49000 -- — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry ND 72000 — — NO 18000 — — -- — Fluorene Plant 1 Cake EPA 82700 pglkg dry ND 43000 -- -- — — NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry NO 172000 -- -- — — NO 18000 — — -- -- Hexachlorobenaene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry NO 43000 -- -- -- — NO 49000 -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry ND 172000 1.- — — — NO 18000 — — -- -- Hexachlorobutadiene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry ND 143000 — — — — NO 49000 �— — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pg/kg dry NO 72000 -- -- -- — NO 18000 — — -- -- Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pg/kg dry NO 110000 -- -- -- — NO 120000 -- — -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry ND 180000 — — — — NO 44000 — — -- -- Hexachloroethane Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 43000 — — — — NO 49000 — — -- — Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pg/kg dry NO 72000 -- -- -- — NO 18000 — — -- -- Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrans Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry ND 43000 -- -- -- — NO 49000 -- 2Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry ND 72000 -- — — — NO 180001— Plant — -- — sophorone Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry ND 43000 — — — NO 49000 — -- — Plant 2Cake EPA 827OC pglkg dry NO 72000 -- -- -- -- NO 18000 -- -- -- -- Kepone Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry -- — -- -- -- -- NO 590000 -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry -- — — — — — NO 210000 — — -- -J Naphthalene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry ND 43000 -- — — — NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 72000 -- -- -- -- NO 18000 — — -- -- Nitrobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry ND 43000 -- -- -- -- No 49000 -- -- -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry ND 172000 — — — — NO 18000 — — — — N-Nitrosodimethylamine Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry ND 43000 — — — — NO 49000 — — — — Plant 2Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry NO 72000 -- -- -- -- No 18000 -- -- -- -- N-Nitrosodin-propylamine Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry IND 33000 -- -- -- -- ND 37000 -- -- -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 55000 — — — — NO 13000 — — — — N-Nitrosodiphenytamine Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry ND 43000 -- — — — NO 49000 — — Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 72000 -- -- -- — NO 18000 — — -- -- Pentachlorophenol Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry N -- -- — ND 120000 — — Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 180000 -- — — — NO 44000 — — -- -- Phenanthrene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 43000 -- -- — — NO 49000 — — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry ND 72000 -- -- — — NO 18000 — — -- -- Phenol Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry ND 43000 -- -- -- — NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry IND ]2000 — — — — ND 18000 — — — -- Pyrene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 143000 — — — — NO 49000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry ND 72000 -- -- -- — NO 18000 — — -- -- Pyridine Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry NO 44000 — — — — NO 50000 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry ND 74000 — — — — NO 18000 — — -- -- Page 31 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND 20000 -- - - -- NO 13000 -- -- - -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry ND 41000 - - - - NO 11000 - - - -- <72,000 Fluorene Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry ND 20000 - - - - NO 13000 - - - -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake Pglkg dry ND 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- - -- <72,000 Hexachlorobenwne Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant Cake Pg/kg dry ND 41000 - - - - NO 11000 - - - - <72,000 Hexachlorobutediene Plants Cake Pg/kg dry ND 20000 - - - - NO 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry NO 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- -- -- <72,000 Hexachlorocyclopentatliene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 51000 -- -- -- -- NO 33000 -- -- -- -- <120,000 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 100000 - - - - NO 28000 - - - - <180,000 Hexachloroethane Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 20000 - - - - NO 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry NO 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- -- -- <72,000 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrans Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 41000 - - - - NO 11000 - - - - <72,000 sophorone Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND 20000 - - - - NO 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- -- -- <]2,000 Kepone Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 250000 -- -- -- -- NO 16000 -- -- -- -- <590,000 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 500000 - - - - NO 14000 - - - - <500,000 Naphthalene Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 20000 - - - - NO 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- -- -- <]2,000 Nitrobenzene Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 20000 -- -- -- -- NO 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake Pglkg dry ND 41000 - - - - NO 11000 - - - - <72,000 N-Nibrosodimethylamine Plant 1 Cake PgVkg dry ND 20000 - - - - NO 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- -- -- <]2,000 N-Nitrosodin-propytamine Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 15000 -- -- -- -- NO 9900 -- -- -- -- <37,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry ND 31000 - - - - NO 8400 - - - - <55,000 N-Nihosodiphenytamine Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 20000 - - - - NO 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- -- -- -- NO 11000 -- -- -- -- <]2,000 Pentachlorophenol Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 51000 -- -- -- -- NO 33000 -- -- -- -- <120,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 100000 - - - - ND 28000 -- - - - <180,000 Phenanthrene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 20000 - - - -- ND 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- - - 1-- IND 11000 -- -- -- -- <92,000 Phenol Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 20000 -- _ _ - ND 13000 -- -- -- -- <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 41000 - ND 11000 - - - - <72,000 Pyrene Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 20000 - - - - ND 13000 - - - - <49,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 41000 -- - - -- NO 11000 -- -- - -- <12,000 Pyridine Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 21000 -- - - - ND 13000 -- -- - -- <50,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 42000 -- - - - ND 11000 -- -- - -- .74,000 Page 32 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL TCLP-SemFvoletile Organic Compounds 12,4-Tdchlombenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mgl NO .05 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mgl ND .05 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C- mglL ND .05 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mgl ND .05 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) _ 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .05 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mgl ND .05 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) 1,4Dichlorobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .05 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mgl ND .05 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) 2,4,5-Tdchlorophenr Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND A -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mgl ND .1 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) 2,4,6-Tdchlorophenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .1 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mgl NO .1 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) 2,1Dichlorophenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .05 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) 2,1Dimethylphenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND 1 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .1 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) 2,4Din nophenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mg1L ND 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .5 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) 2,1Dinitrotoluene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .06 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .06 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(13 Plant Cake EPA8270CC - mglL NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) 2-Chloronaphthalene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C- mglL ND .06 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- TCLP(1311) 2-Chlorophenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .06 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- TCLP(1311) Page 33 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean TCLP-SemFvolalile Organic Compounds 12,4-Tdchlorohenzene Plants Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- -- - <0,050 1,2-Dichlorobenzene Plants Cake mg/L ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- - <0.050 Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - - <0.050 1,0-Dichlorobenzene Plants Cake mg/L NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- - <0.050 Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- - - - - <0.050 1,4Dichlorobenzene Plants Cake mg/L NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- - -- - <0.050 Plant Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- - - - <0.050 2,4,5-Tdchlorophenol Plant 1 Cake mglL NO .1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - <0.10 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .1 -- - - -- -- -- -- - - - <0.10 2,4,6-Tdchlomphenol Plants Cake mglL NO .1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - <0.10 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .1 -- - - -- -- - - - - - <0.10 2,1Dichlorophenol Plant 1 Cake mglL NO AS -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- - <0,050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- - - - - - <0.050 2,1Dimethylphenol Plants Cake mglL NO 1 -- -- -- -- -- - -- - -- - <0.10 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .1 -- - - -- -- - - - - - <0.10 2,4Dinitmphenol Plant 1 Cake mglL NO 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- - <0.50 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .5 -- - - -- -- - - - - - <0.50 2,1Din natoluene Plant 1 Cake mglL NO 05 -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- - - - - - <0,050 2,6-Dingmtoluene Plant 1 Cake mglL NO 05 -- - - -- -- - - - - - <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- - - - - - <0,050 2-Chloronaphthalene Plant 1 Cake mglL NO 05 -- - - -- -- - - - - - <0.050 Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- - -- - <0.050 2-Chlorophenol Plant Cake mglL ND 05 -- - - -- -- -- - - - - <0.050 Page 34 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C- mglL ND .05 -- -- -- — �— -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) 2-Methylnaphihalene Plant Cake EPA 8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mgA- NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) 2-Methylphenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) 2-Nkroaniline Plant Cake EPA8270C- mgA- NO .1 -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) 2-Nurophenol Plant Cake EPA8270C- mglL IND .05 -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(13H) I+ Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C- mgA- ND .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) 3,3-Dichlorobenzldine Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .2 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- MCA. NO .2 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) 3-Nkroaniline Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(13H) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO A -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1317) 4,6-Dinkm-2-methylphenol Plant l Cake EPA8270C- mg& ND .2 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .2 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) 4-Bromophen➢t phenyl ether Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mg& ND .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) 4-Chlor-3-methylphenol Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C- mg& ND�.1 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- TCLP(1311) 4-Chloroamline Plant 1 Cake EPA82700- mg& ND 05 — — — — — — — — — — TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND 05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- TCLP(1311) 4-Chloropheml phenyl ether Plant Cake EPA 8270C- mgA- ND 05 — — — — — — — — — — TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C- mglL ND 05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- TCLP(1311) 4-Mathylphenol Plant Cake EPA82700- mg& .051 .05 — — — — — — — — — — TCLP(1311) I Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .01 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) 4-Nkroaniline Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mg& ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Page 35 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - - -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 2-Methylnephihalene Plant Cake mglL NO 05 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 2-MethNphenol Plant 1 Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mg/L NO .05 -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 2-1,11troaniline Plant 1 Cake mgA- NO .1 -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.10 Plant 2 Cake mg/L NO .1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.10 2-1,11trophenol Plant 1 Cake mglL NO .05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .OS -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 3,3-Dichlorobenzidin Plant 1 Cake mglL NO .2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.20 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.20 3-1,11troaniline Plant 1 Cake mglL NO .1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.10 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.10 4,6-Dinkm-2-methylphenol Plant 1 Cake mgA- NO .2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.20 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.20 4-BromophenN phenyl ether Plant Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 06 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 4-Chlor-3-methylphenol Plant Cake mglL NO .1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- 0.10 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.10 4-Chloroamline Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .05 — — — — — — — — — — <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Plant Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- - - - <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 4-MethNphenol Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- - - - - - 0.051 Plant 2 Cake mgIL NO 05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 4-Nkroaniline Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .5 -- - - -- -- - - - - - <0.50 Page 36 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mgA- ND .5 -- -- -- — �— -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) 4-Nitrophenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mgA- NO .5 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1317) Acenaphthene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- -- — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Acenaphthylene Plant Cake EPA8270C- mgA- NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Aniline Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL IND .05 -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Anthracene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- MCA. NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Azobenzenelt,2-Diphenylhydrazine Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mg/L IND .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO A -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Benz(a)enMracene Plant l Cake EPA8270C- mg& ND OS -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Benzidine Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND 5 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Beano(a)pyrene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mg& ND 05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO 05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- TCLP(1311) Banzo(b)fiuoradhene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C- mg& ND 05 — — — — — — — — — — TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND 05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- TCLP(1311) Benzo(g,h,i)peMene Plant Cake EPA8270C- mg& ND 05 — — — — — — — — — — TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND 05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- TCLP(1311) Benzo(k)lnuoranthene Plant Cake EPA82700- mg& ND 05 — — — — — — — — — — TCLP(1311) I Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND 15 -- -- -- -- -- -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Benzoic acid Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mg& ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Page 37 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant 2 Cake mglL 'ND .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- 0.50 4-1,11trophenol Plant 1 Cake mgIL NO 5 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- 0.50 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - 0.50 Acenaphthene Plant 1 Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Acensphthylene Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Aniline Plant Cake mglL NO .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Anthracene Plant Cake mglL NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Azobenzenell,2-Diphenylhydrazine Plant Cake mglL ND .1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.10 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .7 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.10 Benz(a)enthracene Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO AS -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Benzidine Plant Cake mgA- ND .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- 0.50 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.50 Benzo(a)pyrane Plant Cake mgA- NO .OS -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO AS -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Benzo(b)Ouorardhene Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .05 — — — — — — — — — — <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Benzo(g,h,i)peMene Plant Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- - - - <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Benzo(k)fluoranthene Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- - - - - - <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Benzoic acid Plant Cake mgA- ND .5 -- - - -- -- - - - - - <0.50 Page 38 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .5 -- -- -- — �— -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Beozyl alcohol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mgA- NO .1 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Bis(2chloroethoxy)methane Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- -- — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Bls(2chloroethyl ether Plant Cake EPA8270C- mgA- NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) B1s(2chloroisopropypether Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL IND .05 -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) B1s(2ethylhexN)pMhalate Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .25 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- MCA. NO .25 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Butyl benzyl phthalate Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(13H) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO A -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1317) Chrysene Plant l Cake EPA8270C- mg& ND -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Dibenz(Ah)anthracene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO A -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Dibenzofuron Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mg& ND .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO 05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- TCLP(1311) Diethyl phthalate Plant 1 Cake EPA82700- mg& ND 05 — — — — — — — — — — TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND 05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- TCLP(1311) Dimethyl phthalate Plant Cake EPA82700- mg& ND 05 — — — — — — — — — — TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND 05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- TCLP(1311) Di-n-butyl phthalate Plant Cake EPA82700- mg& ND 1 — — — — — — — — — — TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Di-n-octyl phthalate Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mg& ND .2 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Page 39 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant 2 Cake mglL ND .6 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.50 Benzyl alcohol Plant 1 Cake mg/L ND 1 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <0.10 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - <0.10 Bis(2chlomethoxy)methane Plant Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Bls(2chlomenyhother Plant Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mg/L NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Bis(2chlomisc pmpyl)ethar Plant Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Bis(2-PthylhexN)phIhalate Plant 1 Cake mglL ND .25 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.25 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .25 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.25 Butyl benzyl phthalate Plant Cake mglL ND .1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.10 Plant 2 Cake mgA. NO .7 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.10 Chrysene Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 06 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Dibenz(Ah)anthracene Plant Cake mgA- ND .1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- 0.10 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.10 Dibenzofuran Plant Cake mgA- NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Diethyl phthalate Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .05 - - - -- -- - -- - - - <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Dmxthyl phthalate Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- - - - <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Di-n-butyl phthalate Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .1 -- - - -- -- - - - - - <0.10 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .7 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - 0.10 Di-n-octyl phthalate Plant Cake mgA- ND .2 -- - - -- -- - - - - - <0.20 Page 40 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .2 -- -- -- — �— -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Fluoranthene Plant Cake EPA8270C- mglL No .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mgA- NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Fluorene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- -- — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Hexachlorobenzene Plant Cake EPA8270C- mgA- NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Hexachlorobutadlene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL IND .05 -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C- mglL ND .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Hexachlorocyclopentadlene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .2 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- MCA. NO .2 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Hexachloroethane Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Indeno(1,2,3cd)pyrene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mg& ND .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .1 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Isophorone Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mg& ND .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mgA- IND .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1317) Kepone Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C- mglL NO 1 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Naphthalene Plant Cake EPA82700- mg& ND .06 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Nitrobenzene Plant 1 Cake EPA82700- mg& ND .2 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .2 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) N-Nitosodimethylamine Plant Cake EPA82700- mg& ND .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) N-Nitrosodin-propylamine Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mg& ND .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Page 41 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Wosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant Cake mglL AND .2 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - 0.20 Fluoranthene Plant Cake mgIL NO 05 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <0.050 Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Fluorene Plant 1 Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Hexachlorobenzene Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant Cake mg/L NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Hexachlorobutedlene Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Hexachlorocyclopentadlene Plant Cake mglL ND .2 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.20 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .2 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.20 Hexachloroethane Plant Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant Cake mgA. NO .05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Indeno(1,2,3cd)pyrene Plant Cake mgA- ND .1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- 0.10 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.10 Isophorone Plant Cake mgA- ND .06 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant Cake mglL NO 06 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Kepone Plant Cake mgA- NO .1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- 0.10 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.10 Naphthalene Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .05 - - - - - - - - - - <0.050 Plant Cake mglL NO 06 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Nitrobenzene Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .2 -- - - - - - - - - - <0.20 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .2 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - 0.20 N-Nitosodimethylamine Plant Cake mgA- ND .1 -- - - - - - - - - - <0.10 Plant Cake mglL NO 1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- 0.10 N-Nitrosodin-propylamine Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .1 -- - - - -- - - - - - <0.10 Page 42 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .1 -- -- -- — �— -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) N-NlVosodiphenylemine Plant Cake EPA 8270C- mglL No .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mgA- NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Pentachlorophenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .2 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C- mglL NO .2 -- -- -- -- — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Phenanthrene Plant Cake EPA8270C- mgA- NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Phenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL IND .05 -- -- -- — — -- — — TCLP(130 Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Pyrene Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .05 -- -- — — — TCLP(1311) -- — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C- MCA. NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Pyridine Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C- mglL ND .05 -- -- — — — TCLP(1311) -- — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Organochlonne Pesticides Alddn Plant Cake EPA 8081 mg/kg dry ND .13 -- -- — — NO 150 — — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA8081 mg/kg dry ND 2 -- -- — — NO 90 — — — -- alpha-BHC Plant Cake EPA8081 mglkg dry ND �.13 -- -- — — NO 150 — — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8081 mglkg dry ND 2 -- -- — — NO 90 — — — -- beta-BHC Plant Cake EPA8081 mg/kg dry ND .13 -- -- — — NO 150 — — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA8081 mg/kg dry ND 2 -- -- — — NO 90 — — — -- Chlordane Plant 1 Cake EPA 8081 mg/kg dry ND3 -- -- -- — NO 1500 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8081 mg/kg dry ND 21 -- -- — — NO 100 — — — -- delta-BHC Plant Cake EPA 8081 mglkg dry N -- -- — — NO 300 — — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8081 mglkg dry ND 14 -- -- -- — NO 180 — — -- -- Dieldrm Plant Cake EPA 8081 mglkg dry ND .13 -- -- -- — NO 150 — — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA 8081 mglkgdry ND 2 -- -- — — ND 90 — — — -- Endosulfan 1 Plant 1 Cake EPA8081 mg/kg dry ND�13 -- -- — — NO 150 — — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8081 mglkg dry ND 2 -- -- -- — NO 90 — — -- -- Endosulfan 2 Plant Cake EPA8081 mg/kg dry NO 1.13 -- -- -- — NO -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8081 mglkg dry ND 2 -- -- — — NO 90 — — — Endosulfan Sulfate Plant Cake EPA 8081 mglkg dry ND .27 -- -- — — NO 300 — — — Plant 2Cake EPA8081 mg/kg dry ND 4 -- -- -- — NO 180 — — -- -- Page 43 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .1 -- - - -- -- -- -- - - 0.10 N-NlVosodiphenylemine Plant Cake mglL NO 05 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Pentachlorophenol Plant 1 Cake mglL ND .2 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.20 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .2 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.20 Phenanthrene Plant Cake mgA- NO .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Phenol Plant Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .05 -- - - -- -- - - -- -- -- <0.050 Pyrene Plant 1 Cake mg N .05 _ .- <0.050 Plant Cake mgA-lL NO .OS -- — — - -- -- <0.050 Pyndine Plant Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - LELF -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- <0.050 Organochlonne Pesticides Aldan Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry ND 390 NO 40 3 Plant l Cake mglkg dry ND I260 -- — — — ND 34 -- I- I— -- <260 alpha-BHC Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry ND 390 -- - - - IND 140 -- - - -- <390 Plant 2 Cake mglkg dry ND 260 -- — — — ND 34 -- - - -- <280 beta-BHC Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry ND 390 -- — — — ND 40 -- — — -- <390 Plant 2 Cake mglkg dry ND 260 -- — — — NO 34 -- - - -- <260 Chlordane Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry ND 3900 -- - - -- IND 4" -- - -- <3900 Plant Cake mglkg dry ND 2600 -- — — — ND 340 -- - - - <2600 delta-BHC Plant Cake mglkg dry ND 530 -- — — ND 168 I-- - - -- <530 Dieldrin Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry ND 390 — — -- NO 40 -- <390 Plant 2 Cake --ke mglkg dry ND 260 -- - - -- ND 34 — i- - <260 Endosulfan 1 Plant Cake mglkg dry ND 390 -- - - N -- IND 40 -- — — -- <390 Plant 2 Cake mglkg dry D 260 — — -- ND 34 -- - - -- <260 Endosulfan 2 Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry NO 390 -- -- NO 40 -- <390 Plant 2 Cake mglkg dry ND 260 -- --- - - - ND 134 — — <260 Endosulfan Sulfate Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry ND T80 -- — — — ND 80 — — — <780 Planl2 Cake mglkg dry ND 530 -- -- -- -- NO 68 -- - - -- <530 Page 44 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2018 Jun-2016 Method! Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Endrin Plant Cake EPA 8081 mgft dry ND .13 -- -- — — NO 150 — — — — Plant 2Cake EPA8081 mglkg dry NO 2 -- -- — NO 90 -- — -- -- Endrin Aldehyde Plant Cake EPA8081 mg/kg dry NO .13 -- -- -- — NO 150 -- Plant 2Cake EPA8081 mg/kg dry ND 2 -- -- — — NO 90 — — -- — Endrin Ketone Plant Cake EPA8081 mg/kg dry ND .13 -- -- — — NO 150 — Plant 2Cake EPA 8081 mg/kg dry ND 2 -- -- -- — NO 90 -- -- gamma-BHC Plant Cake EPA 8081 mg/kg dry ND .13 -- -- -- — NO 150 -- Plant 2Cake EPA8081 mglkg dry ND 2 -- -- — — NO 90 — — -- — Heptachlor Plant Cake EPA8081 mglkg dry ND .13 -- -- — — NO 150 -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8081 mglkg dry ND 2 -- -- -- — NO 90 — — -- -- Heptachlor Epoxide Plant 1 Cake EPA 8081 mglkg dry ND .13 -- -- -- — NO 150 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8081 mglkg dry ND 2 -- -- — — NO 90 — — Methoxychlor Plant Cake EPA8081 mglkg dry ND .13 -- -- — — NO 150 — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8081 mg/kg dry ND 2 -- -- -- — ND 90 — — -- -- Mirex Plant Cake EPA 8081 mg/kg dry ND .27 -- -- -- — ND 300 — — -- -- Plant2Cake EPA8081 mglkg dry ND 4 -- -- — — NO 180 — — -- o,p=DDD Plant Cake EPA8081 mglkg dry ND .13 -- -- — — NO 150 — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8081 mg/kg dry ND 2 -- -- -- — NO 90 — — -- -- o,p'-DDE Plant 1 Cake EPA 8081 mg/kg dry ND .13 -- -- -- — ND 150 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8081 mg/kg dry ND 2 -- -- — — NO 90 — — -- o,p=DDT Plant Cake EPA8081 mgdcg dry IND .13 -- -- — — NO 150 — — -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8081 mg/kg dry IND 2 -- -- -- — No 90 — — -- -- p,p'-DDD Plant Cake EPA8081 mg/kg dry ND .13 -- -- -- — No 150 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8081 mglkg dry ND 2 -- -- — — NO 90 — — -- p,p=DDE Plant Cake EPA8081 mglkg dry ND .13 -- -- — — NO 150 — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA8081 mglkg dry ND 2 -- -- -- — NO 90 — — -- -- p,p'-DDT Plant Cake EPA 8081 mglkg dry ND .13 -- — NO 150 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8081 mglkg dry IND 12 — NO 90 — — -- -- Total DDTs Plant Cake EPA 8081 mglkg tlry ND — — NO -- — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8081 mglkgdry NO — — NO -- — — -- -- Toxaphene Plant Cake EPA 8081 mg/kg dry IND .3 5 -- -- — — NO 6100 � Plant 2 Cake EPA8081 mglkgdq ND 80 — — — — NO 3600 TCLP-Organochlonne Pesticides Aland Plant Cake EPA8081- mgl IND -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mgA- IND .0005 - — — — — -- — — TCLP(1311) alpha-BHC Plant Cake TCLP(1311) mgA- IND L0005 Page 45 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Endrin Plant 1 Cake mg/kg dry ND 390 -- — — -- ND 40 -- — — — <390 Plant 2 Cake mg/kg dry ND 260 -- -- — -- NO 134 -- -- — -- <260 Endrin Aldehyde Plant 1 Cake mg/kg dry NO 390 -- — — -- NO 40 -- -- -- -- <390 Plant Cake mg/kg dry ND 260 ND 34 - — — <260 Endrin Ketone Plants Cake mg/kg dry ND 1310 -- — — — ND 40 -- — — -- <390 Plant 2 Cake mg/kg dry NO 280 -- — — -- NO 34 -- — — -- <260 gamma-BHC Plant 1 Cake mg/kg dry ND 390 -- — — — ND 40 -- — — -- <390 Plant Cake mg/kg dry ND 260 — — — IND IM — — — <260 Heptachlor Plants Cake mg/kg dry ND 390 — — — ND 40 — — — <390 Plant 2 Cake mg/kg dry ND 260 1-- — — — ND 134 -- -- — -- <260 Heptachlor Epoxide Plant 1 Cake mg/kg dry ND 390 -- — — — NO 40 -- -- — -- <390 Plant 2 Cake mglkg dry ND 260 -- — — — ND 34 — — — <260 Methoxychlor Plant Cake mglkg dry ND 390 - ND 40 -- — — — <390 Plant 2 Cake mglkg dry ND 260 -- — — — NO 134 -- — — -- <260 Mirex Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry NO 780 -- — — — ND 80 -- -- -- <780 Plant2 Cake mg0cg tlry ND 530 — — — ND 68 — — <530 o,P=DDD Plant 1 Cake mg0cg dry ND 1390 -- — — — ND 40 — — — — <390 Plant 2 Cake mglkg dry NO 1260 1 NO 34 -- -- -- -- <260 o,p'-DDE Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry ND 390 -- -- -- -- NO 40 -- — -- -- <390 Plant 2 Cake mg0cg dry ND 260 — — — — ND 34 — — <260 o,p=DDT Plant 1 Cake mg0cg dry�ND 390 — — — — ND 140 — — <390 Plant 2 Cake mglkg dry ND 260 -- -- -- -- NO 134 -- — -- <260 p,p'-DDD Plant 1 Cake mg/kg dry NO 390 -- -- -- -- NO 40 -- — — -- <390 Plant 2 Cake mg0cg dry IND 260 — — — -- ND 34 — <260 p,p=DDE Plantl Cake mg0cg dry ND 390 — — — -- IND 40 ---- — — — <390 Plant Cake mg/kg dry ND I260 - — — -- NO 34 — — -- <260 p,p'-DDT Plant 1 Cake mglkg dry IND 1390 -- — — -- IND 40 -- _ _ -- <390 Plant 2 Cake mg0cg dry IND 1260 -- — — — ND 34 — <260 Total DDTs Plant Cake mg0cg dry IND — -- — — — ND — -- — — — <390 Plant 2 Cake mglkg dry ND — -- -- -- -- No -- -- -- -- -- <260 Toxaphene Plant l Cake mglkg dry ND 16000 -- -- -- -- No 1600 -- -- -- -- <16,000 Plant Cake mg0cg tlry ND 11000 -- — — — NO 1400 — — — — <11,000 TCLP-Organochlodne Pesticides Aldrin Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .0005 -- — — — — — — — — — <0.00050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .0005 -- — — — — — — — — — <0.00050 alpha-BHC Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .0005 -- — — -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 Page 46 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 2 Cake EPA 8081- mglL NO -- TCLP(1311) bete-BHC Plant 1 Cake EPA 8081- mglL ND .0005 -- -- — — — -- — — TCLPd317) -- _ -- Plant 2Cake EPA8081- mgA- ND .0005 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Chlordane Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mglL NO .005 -- -- — — — -- — — TCLPM311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mglL NO .005 -- TCLP(1311) delta-BHC Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mglL NO TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mglL NO .001 -- - — — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1317) Dielddn Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mglL NO .0005 -- -- — — — -- — — TCLP0311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- MCA. ND .0005 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1317) Endosulfan 1 Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mglL ND .0005 -- -- — — — -- — — TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- MCA. NO -- TCLP(1317) Endosulfan 2 Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mglL NO .0005 -- — — -- — — TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mglL ND -- TCLP11317) Endosulfan Sulfate Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mg& ND .001 -- -- — — — -- — — TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mgA- NO .001 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Endrin Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mg& ND — TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mglL NO -- TCLP(1317) Endrin Aldehyde Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mgd- ND .0005 -- — — — — -- — — TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mgA- NO .0005 -- -- — — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Endrin Ketone Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mg& ND .0005 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mg& NO .0005 -- -- — — — -- — — �-- -- TCLP(1311) gamma-BHC Plant l Cake EPA8081-(1311 mgA- ND .0005 —� TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mg& ND .0005 -- -- — — — -- — — TCLP(1311) Heptachlor Plant l Cake EPA8081-(1311 mglL ND .0005 --� TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mg& ND .0005 -- — — — — — — — TCLP(1311) Heptachlor+Epoxid Plant Cake EPA8081- mg& ND — — — — TCLP(1311) Page 47 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for niosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant 2 Cake mglL 'ND .0006 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.00050 bete-BHC Plant 1 Cake mglL NO 0005 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <0.00050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .0006 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - <0.00050 Chlordane Plant 1 Cake mglL ND 1.005 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.0050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .006 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0050 delta-BHC Plant 1 Cake mgA- NO .001 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.0010 Plant 2 Cake mg/L NO .001 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - 0.0010 Dielddn Plant 1 Cake mglL ND .0005 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.00050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .0006 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 Endosulfan 1 Plant 1 Cake mglL ND .0005 -- - - -- -- - -- -- -- -- <0.00050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .0006 -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 Endosulfan 2 Plant 1 Cake mglL ND .0006 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .0006 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 Endosulfan Sulfate Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .001 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.0010 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .001 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - <0.0010 Endrin Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .0005 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .0005 -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- - - <0.00050 Endrin Aldehyde Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .0005 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 0006 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 Endrin Ketone Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .0005 -- - - - - - - - - - <0.00050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 0006 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 gamma-BHC Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .0005 -- - - -- -- - - - - - <0.00050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .0006 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - <0.00050 Heptachlor Plant Cake mgA- ND .0005 - - - -- -- - - - - - <0.00050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 0006 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 Heptachlor+Epoxide Plant Cake mglL ND - -- - - -- -- - - - - - <0.00050 Page 48 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 2 Cake EPA 8081- mgA- NO — -- -- -- — �— -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Heptachlor Epoxide Plant 1 Cake EPA 8081- mglL ND .0005 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mgA- ND .0005 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Methoxychlor Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mg/L ND .0005 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLPM311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mglL ND .0005 -- TCLP(1317) Minsk Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mglL NO -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mglL NO .001 -- -- — — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1317) o,p'-DDD Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mglL NO .0005 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP0311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- MCA. ND .0005 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1317) o,p'-DDE Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mglL ND .0005 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- MCA. NO -- TCLP(1317) o,p'-DDT Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mglL NO .0005 -- — — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mglL ND -- TCLP(1317) p,p'-DDD Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mg& ND -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mgA- NO .0005 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1317) p,p'-DDE Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mg& ND .0005 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mglL ND .0005 -- -- — — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1317) p,p'-DDT Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mg& ND .0005 -- — — — — -- — — -- TCLP(13H) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mgA- ND .0005 -- -- — — — -- — — -- TCLP(13H) Toxaphene Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- mg& ND .025 — — — — — — — -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- mgA- NO .025 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1317) STLC-Organochlonne Pesticides Aldan Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- pg1L ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- pg/L NO .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC alpha-BHC Plant Cake EPA8081- PgIL ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- pg/L ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC beta-BHC Page 49 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant Cake mgA- ND - -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - <0.00050 Heptachlor Epoxide Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .0005 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <0.00050 Plant Cake mglL ND .0005 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - <0.00050 Methoxychlor Plant 1 Cake mglL NO I.0005 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.00050 Plant Cake mgA- NO .0005 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 Mires Plant 1 Cake mgA- NO .001 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.0010 Plant 2 Cake mg/L NO .001 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - 0.0010 o,p'-DDD Plant 1 Cake mglL ND .0005 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.00050 Plant Cake mglL NO .0005 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 o,p'-DDE Plant 1 Cake mglL NO .0005 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .0005 -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 o,p'-DDT Plant 1 Cake mglL NO .0005 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 Plant 2 Cake mgA. NO .0005 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - <0.00050 p,p'-DDD Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .0005 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .0005 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - <0.00050 p,p'-DDE Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .0005 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 Plant 2 Cake mgA- NO .0005 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - <0.00050 p,p'-DDT Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .0005 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 Plant Cake mgA- NO 0005 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.00050 Toxaphene Plant 1 Cake mgA- IND .025 -- - - - - - - - - - <0.025 Plant Cake mgA- NO 025 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.025 STLC-Organochlonne Pesticides Aldan Plant 1 Cake pglL ND .5 - - - - - - - - - - 10.50 Plant 2 Cake pg/L NO 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - <0.50 alpha-BHC Plant 1 Cake pglL ND .5 - - - - - - - - - - <0.50 Plant 2 Cake pglL NO 5 -- - - -- -- -- -- - - - <0.50 beta-BHC Page 50 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 1 Cake EPA 8081- pglL ND .5 -- -- -- — �— -- -- — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- PgIL ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Chlordane Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- PgIL NO 5 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- PgIL ND 5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC delta-BHC Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- pglL NO 1 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- PgIL ND 1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Dieldrin Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- pglL NO .5 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- PgIL ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Endosulfan 1 Plant 1 Cake EPA 8081- pg/L NO .5 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- PgIL ND L5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Endosulfan 2 Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- pg/L �ND .5 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- PgIL ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC EndosulMn Sugate Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- pg/L NO 1 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- PgIL ND 1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Endrin Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- pg/L NO .6 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- pglL ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Endrin Aldehyde Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- pg/L 7ND .5 5 -- -- -- -- — -- -- — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- pgIL -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- STLC Endrin Ketone Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- pg/L N O .5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- STLC Plant Cake EPA 8081- PgIL5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- STLC gamma-BHC Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- pg/L NO 6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- PgIL ND .5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- STLC Heptachlor Plant Cake EPA8081- pg/L No 6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- pglL NO .5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- STLC Heptachlor Epoxide Plant Cake EPA 8081- pg/L NO 5 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- PgIL NO .5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- STLC Methoxychlor Page 51 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plants Cake pg/L ND .5 -- - - - -- -- -- -- - -- <0.50 Plant 2 Cake Pg/L ND .5 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <0.50 Chlordane Plant l Cake pg/L NO S -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <5.0 Plant 2 Cake Pg/L ND 5 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <5.0 delta-BHC Plant 1 Cake pg/L NO 1 -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <1.0 Plant 2 Cake Pg/L NO 1 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <1.0 Dieldrin Plant Cake pg/L NO .5 -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- - - 0.50 Plant 2 Cake Pg/L NO .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.50 Endosulfan 1 Plant 1 Cake pg/L NO .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.50 Plant 2 Cake pg/L ND .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.50 Endosulfan 2 Plant 1 Cake pg/L NO .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.50 Plant 2 Cake pg/L ND .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.50 Endosulfan Sulfate Plant 1 Cake pg/L NO 1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <1.0 Plant 2 Cake pg/L ND 1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <1.0 Endrin Plant 1 Cake pg/L NO 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.50 Plant 2 Cake pg/L NO .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - 0.50 Endrin Aldehyde Plant 1 Cake pg/L NO 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.50 Plant 2 Cake pg/L NO .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - <0.50 Endrin Ketone Plant 1 Cake pg/L NO 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.50 Plant 2 Cake pg/L NO .5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - <0.50 gamma-BHC Plant 1 Cake pg/L NO 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.50 Plant 2 Cake Pg/L NO .5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - <0.50 Heptachlor Plant 1 Cake pg/L NO 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.50 Plant 2 Cake pg/L NO .5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - <0.50 Heptachlor Epoxide Plant 1 Cake pg/L NO 5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- 0.50 Plant 2 Cake pg/L NO .5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - 0.50 Methoxychlor Page 52 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 1 Cake EPA 8081- pglL ND .5 -- -- -- — �— -- -- — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- PgIL ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Mirex Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- PgIL ND 1 -- — — -- -- — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- PgVL ND 1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC o,p'-DDD Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- pglL NO .5 -- — — -- -- — -- -- STLC _ Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- PgIL ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC o,p'-DDE Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- pglL NO .5 -- — — -- -- — -- -- STLC _ Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- PgIL ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC o,p'-DDT Plant 1 Cake EPA 8081- pglL NO .5 -- — — -- -- — -- -- STLC _ Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- PgIL ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC p.p'-DDD Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- pglL ND .5 -- -- — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- PgIL ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC p.p'-DDE Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- pglL NO 5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- PgIL ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — STLC p.p'-DDT Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- pglL ND STLC Plant Cake TLC 1- pglL ND 5 STLC Total DDTs Plant 1 Cake EPA8081- pglL NO — -- -- -- — — STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- pglL NO — -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- STLC Toxephene Plant Cake EPA8081- pg/L NO 25 -- -- — — — -- — — -- STLC Plant 2 Cake EPA8081- PgIL NO 25 -- -- — — — -- — — STLC PCBs PCB 1016 Plant 1 Cake EPA 8082 pglkg dry ND 1300 -- -- — — NO 1500 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8082 Pglkg dry IND 1000 — — — — NO 900 — — -- -- PCB 1221 Plant 1 Cake EPA8082 Pglkg dry IND 11300 — — — — NO 1500 — — I-- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA 8082 pglkg dry ND 1000 -- -- — — ND 900 — — -- -- PCB 1232 Plant 1 Cake EPA 8082 pglkg dry NO 11300 -- -- — — NO 1500 — — -- -- Plant2Cake EPA8082 Pglkg dry ND 11000 — — — — NO 900 — — I-- PCB 1242 Plant 1 Cake EPA8082 pglkg dry ND 11300 — — — — NO 1500 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8082 pglkg dry NO 1000 -- -- — — NO 900 — — -- -- PCB 1248 Page 53 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant 1 Cake pglL ND .5 -- - - - -- -- -- -- - -- <0.50 Plant 2 Cake Pg/L ND .5 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <0.50 Minsk Plant 1 Cake pglL ND 1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <1.0 Plant 2 Cake Pg/L ND 1 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <1.0 o,p'-DDD Plants Cake pglL NO .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - 0.50 Plant 2 Cake PgIL NO .5 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.50 o,p'-DDE Plants Cake pglL NO .5 -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- - - <0.50 Plant 2 Cake Pg/L NO .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.50 o,p'-DDT Plant 1 Cake pg/L NO .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 Plant 2 Cake pglL ND .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.50 p.p'-DDD Plant 1 Cake pg/L NO .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 Plant 2 Cake pglL ND .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.50 p.p'-DDE Plant 1 Cake pg/L NO .5 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 Plant 2 Cake pglL ND .5 -- - <0.50 p.p'-DDT Plant 1 Cake pg/L N 5 -- -- <0.50 Plant Cake pglL NO .5 -- - - - - -- <0.50 Total DDTs Plant 1 Cake pg/L NO -- -- - - -- -- - -- -- -- - <0.50 Plant 2 Cake pglL NO - -- - - - -- - -- -- - -- <0.50 Toxephene Plant Cake pg/L NO 25 -- - - -- -- - -- -- -- -- <25 Plant 2 Cake PgIL NO 25 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <25 PCBs PCB 1016 Plant 1 Cake pg/k9 dry NO 3300 -- - - -- NO 390 -- -- - -- <3300 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 3700 - - - - IND 340 -- - - - <3700 PCB 1221 Plant 1 Cake pglkg cry ND 3300 - ND 390 - - - - <3300 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 3700 -- - - ND 340 -- -- - -- <3100 PCB 1232 Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 3300 -- - - -- IND 1390 -- - - -- <3300 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 3700 -- - - - IND 1340 -- - - -- <3700 PCB 1242 Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 3300 -- - - - ND I390 I-- - - -- <3300 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 3700 -- - - - ND 1340 -- - - -- <3100 PCB 1248 Page 54 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 1 Cake EPA8082 pg/kg dry ND 1300 -- -- NO 1500 — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8082 pglkg dry ND 1000 -- — — �ND 900 — — -- — PCB 1254 Plant Cake EPA8082 pg/kg dry ND 1300 -- — NO 1500 -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8082 pglkg dry NO 11000 -- -- -- — PD 900 — -- -- PCB 1260 Plant 1 Cake EPA8082 pg/kg dry NO 1300 -- -- -- — NO 1500 -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8082 pg/kg dry ND 11000 -- — — NO 900 — — -- -- PCB_HR_DM Plant Cake EPA8082 Pg/kg dry ND 1300 -- — — NO 1500 -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8082 pglkg dry NO 1000 -- -- -- — NO 900 — — -- -- Total PCBs Plant 1 Cake EPA 8082 pglkg dry NO — -- -- -- — NO -- — — -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8082 Pg/kg dry ND — -- -- — — NO -- — — -- -- Herbicides 2,4,5-T Plant 1 Cake EPA8151 Pg/kg dry ND 240 -- -- — — — -- _ -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8151 pg/kg dry NO 180 17 -- -- 2,4,5-TP(Silvex) Plant 1 Cake EPA8151 pg/kg dry NO 240 -- -- — — — -- _ -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8151 pg/kg dry ND 180 -- — — — — -- -- 2,4-D Plant 1 Cake EPA8151 pg/kg dry ND 240 -- — — — — -- _ -- -- Plant 2Cake EPA8151 pglkg dry NO 180 -- -- — — — -- -- 2.1DB Plant 1 Cake EPA8151 pglkg dry NO 240 -- -- — — — -- _ -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8151 pg/kg dry ND 180 -- — — — — -- -- 4-Nurcphenol Plant Cake EPA8151 pg/kg dry ND �940 -- — — — — -- _ -- -- Plant2Cake EPA8151 pg/kg dry NO 730 -- -- — — — -- -- Dalapon Plant 1 Cake EPA8151 pglkg dry 770 2900 -- -- — — — -- — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8151 pglkg dry ND 2200 — — — — Dicamba Plant 1 Cake EPA8151 pg/kg dry ND 1240 -- — — — — -- — — — Plant 2Cake EPA8151 pglkg dry NO 180 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- Dichlorprop(2,4DP) Plant 1 Cake EPA8151 pglkg dry NO 240 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8151 pg/kg dry ND 180 — — — — -- — — — Dinoseb(DNBP) Plant 1 Cake EPA8151 pg/kg dry ND I1400 — — — — -- — — — Plant 2Cake EPA 8151 pglkg dry ND 1100 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- MCPA Plant 1 Cake EPA 8151 Pglkg dry IND 157000 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8151 Pg/kg dry 16000 144000 -- — — — — — — MCPP Plant 1 Cake EPA8151 Pg/kg dry I8400 57000 — — — — — — — — — -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8151 pglkg dry ND 44000 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- Pentachlorophenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8151 pglkg dry NO 240 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8151 pg/kg dry ND 180 — — — — — Picloram Plant 1 Cake EPA8151 Pg/kg dry ND 240 — — — — — Plant 2Cake EPA 8151 pglkg dry ND 180 — — — — — — — — — -- TCLP-Herbicides 2,4,5-T Plant Cake EPA 8151- mg/L NO 025 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Page 55 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 3300 -- - - -- NO 390 -- -- - -- <3300 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry ND 3700 — — — — ND 340 -- - - - <3700 PCB 1254 Plant Cake pg/kg dry ND 3300 — — — — ND 390 — — — <3300 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 3700 -- -- -- -- NO 340 -- -- - -- <3700 PCB 1260 Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 3300 -- -- -- -- NO 390 — -- <3300 Plant Cake pg/kg dry ND 3700 — — — — NO 340 — I— -- <3700 PCB_HR_DM Plant Cake pg/kg dry ND 3300 — — — — NO 390 — -- <3300 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry NO 3700 -- -- -- -- NO 34 — -- <3700 Total PCBs Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO -- -- -- -- -- NO -- -- -- - -- <3300 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry ND — — — — — NO — -- — — — <3700 Herbicides 2,4,5-T Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 250 — — — — — — <250 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO I 1210 -- -- -- -- -- — -- <210 2,4,5-TP(Silvex) Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry 69 250 -- -- -- -- -- - - -- 69 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry 190 1210 -- - - - - - - - -- 190 2,4-D Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 250 — — — — — — -- — — -- <250 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 210 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- <210 2.1DB Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 250 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- <250 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 210 — — — — — — — — — — <210 4-Nitrophenol Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry ND 1000 — — — — — — — — — — <1000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 820 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <820 Dalapon Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 3000 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- TTO Plant 2 Cake Pglkg dry ND 2500 — — — — — — — — — — <2500 Dicamba Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND 250 -- - - - - - - - - - <250 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 1210 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <210 Dichlorprop(2,4DP) Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry NO 250 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <250 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 210 — — — — — — — — — — <210 Dinoseb(DNBP) Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry ND 1500 — — — — — — — — — — <1500 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 1200 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- <1200 MCPA Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 61000 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- <61,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 50000 — — — — — — — — — — 16,000 MCPP Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 61000 — — — — — — — — — — 8,400 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 50000 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- <50,000 Pentachlorophenol Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry NO 250 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- <250 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry ND 210 -- - - - - - - - - - <210 Picloram Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry ND 250 — — — — — — — — — — <250 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry NO 210 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <210 TCLP-Herbicides 2,4,5-T Plant 1 Cake mgA- ND .025 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.025 Page 56 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 2 Cake EPA 8151- mgA- NO .025 -- -- -- — �— -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) 2,4,5-TP(Sllvex) Plant 1 Cake EPA8151- mglL NO .025 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8151- mgA- NO L025 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) 2,4,6-Tdchlomphenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8151- mglL NO .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8151- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- -- — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) 2,aD Plant 1 Cake EPA8151- mglL ND .05 -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8151- mglL NO .05 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) 2,4DB Plant 1 Cake EPA8151- mglL IND .05 -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(13H) Plant 2 Cake EPA8151- mg/L ND .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) 2,6-Dichlorophenol Plant 1 Cake EPA8151- mglL ND .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8151- MCA. NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) 3,5-Dichlorobenzolc acid Plant Cake EPA8151- mglL 'ND .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8151- mglL NO A -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) 4-Numphenol Plant l Cake EPA8151- mg& ND .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8151- mglL NO .1 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) ACIFLUORFEN Plant 1 Cake EPA8151- mg1L IN .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA81 St- mglL NO A -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) BENTAZON Plant 1 Cake EPA8151- mg& ND .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8151- mglL NO .1 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Chloramban Plant Cake EPA8151- mg& ND .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8151- mglL ND .1 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Dalapon Plant Cake EPA8151- mg& ND .5 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8151- mglL ND .5 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) DCPA Plant Cake EPA8151- mg& ND .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8151- mglL ND .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Dicamba Plant Cake EPA8151- mg& ND .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Page 57 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant 2 Cake mglL 'ND .025 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.025 2,4,5-TP(Sllvex) Plant 1 Cake mglL NO .025 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <0.025 Plant 2 Cake mgA- ND .025 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.025 2,4,6-Tdchlorophenol Plant 1 Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 2,aD Plant Cake mgA- ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant Cake mglL NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 2,4DB Plant Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant l Cake mgA- NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 2,6-Dichlorophenol Plant Cake mglL ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Plant l Cake mglL NO .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid Plant Cake mglL ND .1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.10 Plant 2 Cake mgA. NO .7 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.10 4-1,11trophenol Plant Cake mgA- ND .1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- 0.10 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.10 ACIFLUORFEN Plant Cake mgA- ND .1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- 0.10 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.10 BENTAZON Plant Cake mgA- NO .1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- 0.10 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.10 Chloramban Plant Cake mgA- ND .1 - - - - - - - - - - <0.10 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.10 Dalapon Plant Cake mgA- NO .5 - - - - - - - - - - 0.50 Plant 2 Cake mglL NO 5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.50 DCPA Plant Cake mgA- NO .1 - - - - - - - - - - 0.10 Plant Cake mglL NO 1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- 0.10 Dicamba Plant Cake mgA- IND .05 - - - -- -- - - - - - <0.050 Page 58 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Plant 2 Cake EPA 8151- mg/L ND .05 -- -- -- — �— -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Dichlorprop(2,4-DP; Plant Cake EPA8151- mg/L NO .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2 Cake EPA8151- mgA- NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Dinoseb(DNBP) Plant 1 Cake EPA8151- mg/L ND .1 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2Cake EPA8151- mg/L NO A -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) MCPA Plant 1 Cake EPA8151- mg/L ND 12 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(13H) Plant 2Cake EPA 8151- mg/L NO 12 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) MCPP Plant 1 Cake EPA8151- mg/L NO 12 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(13H) Plant 2Cake EPA8151- mg/L ND 12 -- -- -- — — -- -- — -- -- TCLP(1311) Pentachlorophenol Plant 1 Cake EPA 8151- mg/L ND .025 -- -- — — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2Cake EPA8151- mg/L NO .025 -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1317) Picloram Plant 1 Cake EPA8151- mg/L ND .05 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Plant 2Cake EPA8151- mg/L NO .05 -- -- -- — — -- — — -- -- TCLP(1311) Other 2,3,7,8-TetmchlorodibenzopEioxin Plant 1 Cake EPA 1613B pg/g dry ND 128 -- -- — — NO 30 -- Plant 2Cake EPA 1613E pg/g dry ND 19 -- -- — — NO 23 JI Chrysotile Plant Cake %dry ND — -- -- — — NO -- Plant 2 Cake %tlry ND — -- -- — — NO -- — — -- Paint Filter Free Liquid test Plant 1 Cake EPA 9095A - NEG — NEG -- NEG — NEG -- NEG — NEG -- Plant2Cake EPA9095A - NEG — NEG -- NEG — NEG -- NEG — NEG JI Tentatively ldentilled Compounds .BETA:SITOSTEROL Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry 440000 65000 -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- 1000147-77-7 Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry -- -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- 1000210-86-9 Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry -- — -- -- — — — -- — '— -- -J 2,7-DimethyF3,5-dimethylthio-2H-1, Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry 1570000 110000 -- -- — — — -- — I— -- 2-ETHYL-3-METHYLCYCLOPENTENE Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry -- — -- -- — — 380000 74000 '— — -- -- 2-Pentanone,4-hydroxy- rethy4 Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry -- — -- -- — — 1300000 74000 -- — -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C Pgn g dry — — — — — — 11100000 27000 — — 758-16-7 Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry -- -- -- — — — -- — — -- -- 9,19-CYCLOCHOLEST-24-EN30L,14METHYL- Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C pgng dry 1610000 11100001" I-- — — — -- — — -- -- Page 59 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean Plant 2Cake mg/L ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - -- <0.050 Dichlorprop(2,4-DP) Plant Cake mg/L NO 05 -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- <0.050 Plant 2 Cake mg/L ND .05 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <0.050 Dinoseb(DNBP) Plant 1 Cake mg/L ND .1 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <0.10 Plant 2Cake mg/L ND .1 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - 0.10 MCPA Plant Cake mg/L NO 12 -- - - -- -- - -- -- - -- <12 Plant 2Cake mg/L NO 12 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <12 MCPP Plant 1 Cake mg/L ND 12 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <12 Plant 2Cake m9/L NO 12 - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- <12 Pentachlorophenol Plant 1 Cake mg/L ND .025 -- - - <0.025 Plant 2Cake mg/L NO .025 -- - - -- -- -- -- - <0.025 Picloram Plant 1 Cake mg/L ND .05 -- - - <0.050 Plant 2Cake mg/L NO .05 -- - - -- -- - -- -- -- -- <0.050 I Other 2,3,7,8-Tetrechlorodibenzop-dioxin Plant Cake pg/g dry NO 27 -- - - — ND 11 -- — — -- <30 Plant 2Cake pg/g dry NO 24 -- — — — ND 9.1 -- - - -- <24 Ch ysotile Plant Cake %dry ND — -- — _ = ND = -- -- ND Plant 2Cake %tlry ND — -- — ND -- -- ND Paint Filter Free Liquid test Plant 1 Cake - NEG — NEG — NEG = NEG = NEG — NEG -- NEG Plant2Cake - NEG — NEG — NEG NEG NEG — NEG -- NEG Tentatively Identified Compounds .BETA:SITOSTEROL T Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry -- - -- - I— -- -- -- -- - - -- 440,000 1000147-77-7 T T Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry -- - -- - I— -- 240WO 117000I-- I— — -- 240,000 1000210-86-9 T Plant 2Cake Pglkg dry -- 1— -- I— I— -- IBOM 170001— -- -- -- 180,000 2,7-DimethyF3,5-dimethylthio-2H-1,2,4-t Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry -- — I i- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 570,000 2-ETHYL-3-METHYLCYCLOPENTENE Plant 1 Cake pglkg dry -- - -- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 380,000 2-Pentanone,4-hydroxy-0 methy- Plant 1 Cake Pglkg dry 340000 31000 -- - - -- -- -- -- -- 820,000 Plant 2 Cake pglkg dry -- - - - - -- - - 1,100,000 758-16-7 Plant Cake pglkg dry -- - -- - - - 93000 17000 -- — — — 93,000 9,19-CYCLOCHOLEST-24-EN-3-OL,14METHYL- Plant2 Cake Pg/kg dry -- - -- -- - - - - - - 610,000 Page 60 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Blosolids Jan-2016 Feb-2016 Mar-2016 Apr-2016 May-2016 Jun-2016 Method! Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL 9-OCTADECENOIC ACID,(E} Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C Pg/kg dry 580000 65000 -- — — — 790000 74000 — — — — Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry 2200000 110000 -- -- -- -- I180000 27000 -- — -- -- Cholest-0 en-3-one Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry 300000 65000 -- -- -- -- 650000 74000 -- -- -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry 540000 110000 -- — — — 97000 27000 — — — — CHOLEST-5-EN-3-ONE Plants Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry -- - - - - - - CHOLEST-S-EN-3-OL,(3.BETA.)- Plant2 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry — — — — -- — — -- — Cholestan3ol Plant Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry — — -- — — — 11000000 27000 — — -- -- Cholestsn-3-one Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pglkg dry — — — — — — 1500000 74000 — — -- Plant 2Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry 1140000 27000 — — -- -- Cholestan-3-one,(5.beta.} Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pg/kg dry -- -- -- -- -- - - -- - Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry -- — — — — — 620000 27000 — — CHOLESTAN-3-ONE,4,4-DIMETHVL-,(5.ALPHA Plant Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry -- — — — — — 130000 27000 -- -- CHOLESTANE,2,3-EPDXY,(2.ALPHA.,3.ALPH Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry 1900000 65000 -- — — — — -- — — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry 2500000 110000 -- -- -- - - -- I— 1— -- I-- CHOLESTANE,3-ETHOXV-,(3.BETA.,S.ALPH/ Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pg/kg dry 470000 65000 1240000 74000 — — -- -- CHOLESTANOL Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry 2300000 65000 -- -- — — 3000000 74000 — — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry 2500000 110000 -- — — — -- — — -- CHOLESTEROL Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry -- - -- - - 1780000 74000 — — -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry -- - -- -- - - 120000 27000 — — -- -- CVCLOHEXENE,3-(2-METHVLPROPVL)- Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry -- - - - -- - - -- -- Ergosl!J-en3ol,(3.beta.)- — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry -- - - - -- - - -- -- n-Hemdecanoic acid Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry 1400000 65000 -- -- -- -- -- -- - - -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry 3500000 110000 — — — — — -- — — -- -- OCTADECANOIC ACID Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C pglkg dry 430000 65000 -- — — 400000 74000 — — -- Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C pg/kg dry 1000000 110000 -- -- - - - -- - - -- -- PREGN-5-EN-20-ONE,3HVDROXV- Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pg/kg dry -- - -- -- -- - - -- - - -- Squalene Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry 350000 65000 1510000 74000 — — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry 760000 110000 — — — — — -- — — -- -- TETRADECANOIC ACID Plant 1 Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry — — — — — — — — — — -- -- Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry -- -- -- -- - - - -- - - -- TRIDECANE Plant 2 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry -- -- -- -- -- — 93000 127000 — — -- -- UNKNOWN Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry -- - -- -- -- - - - - - - -- VITAMIN E Plant 1 Cake EPA 8270C pglkg dry -- - - - - - - - - - - -- Plant 2Cake EPA8270C Pg/kg dry -- - -- -- - - - - - - - -- Page 61 of 62 Orange County Sanitation District-2016 Biosolids Compliance Report Appendix C-Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents for Biosolids Jul-2016 Aug-2016 Sep-2016 Oct-2016 Nov-2016 Dec-2016 Annual Units Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Average RL Mean 9-OCTADECENOIC ACID,(Ef Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry 570000 31000 — — — -- 330000 20000 -- — — — 570,000 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry 650000 62000 -- -- — -- 440000 17000 -- -- — -- 870,000 Cholest-0 en-3-one Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry 270000 31000 -- -- — -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 410,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry 470000 62000 — — — -- 150000 17000 — — — — 310,000 CHOLEST-5-EN-3-0NE Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry -- — — — — -- 120000 20000 — — — — 120,000 CHOLEST-S-EN-3-0L,(3.BETA.)- Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry -- — -- — — — 770000 17000 — — — — 770,000 Cholestan3ol Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry 320000 62000 -- — — — 120000 17000 — — — — 480,000 Cholestan3one Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry -- — -- — — — — — — — — — 1,500,000 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry -- — -- — — -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 140,000 Cholestan-3-one,(5.beta. Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry 130000 31000 -- — — -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 130,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry -- — -- — — — — — — — — — 620,000 CHOLESTAN-3-ONE,4,4-DIMETHYL-,(S.ALPHA Plant Cake pg/kg dry -- — -- — — — — — — — — — 130,000 CHOLESTANE,2,3-EPDXY-,(2.ALPHA.,3.ALPH Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry -- — -- — — — — — — — — — 1,900,000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,500,000 CHOLESTANE,3-ETHOXY-,(3.BETA.,5.ALPHA. Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 360,000 CHOLESTANOL Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry 300000 3 001 0 -- -- -- -- 870000 20000 -- -- -- -- 1,600,000 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry -- — — — — -- -- — -- — — — 2,500,000 CHOLESTEROL Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry — — — — — -- -- — -- — — — 780,000 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry -- — -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 120,000 CYCLOHEXENE,3-(2-METHYLPROPYL)- Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry 200000 62000 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 200,000 Ergost-7-en3ol,(3. Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry 210000 62000 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 210,000 n-Hexadecanoic acid Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry 1400000 31000 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,400,000 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry 2000000 62000 — — — -- -- — -- — — — 2,800,000 OCTADECANOIC ACID Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry 530000 31000 — — — -- 230000 20000 -- — — — 400,000 Plant 2Cake pg/kg dry 560000 62000 -- — — -- 290000 17000 -- -- — -- 620,000 PREGN-5-EN-20-ONE,3-HYDROXY- Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry 1800000 31000 -- — — -- -- 1,800,000 Squalene Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry -- — -- — — -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 430,000 Plant 2 Cake Pg/kg dry 390000 62000 -- — — -- -- — — — — 580,000 TETRADECANOIC ACID Plant 1 Cake Pg/kg dry 170000 62000 — — — _� — — — 130:000 Plant 2 Cake pg/k9 dry 1]0000 62000 -- -- -- - 96000 17000 -- -- -- -- 130,000 TRIDECANE Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry -- — -- -- -- -- -- Z-- -- -- 93,000 UNKNOWN Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry -- — -- — — -- 13000D 20000 -- — — -- 130,000 VITAMIN E Plant 1 Cake pg/kg dry 250000 62000 -- — — -- -- - 170.000 Plant 2 Cake pg/kg dry 250000 62000 -- — — -- 98000 17000 -- - 170,000 Page 62 of 62 APPENDIX D Arizona Biosolids Annual Report Form for Reporting Year 2016 2013 Biosolids or Sewage Sludge ADEQ 14 Annual Report Mail signed printout to:Robert Phalan,ADEO Blosolids Coordinator 1110 W.Washington St., Phoenix,AZ 85007 and email file to:biosolids@azdeq.gm Date signed NPDES/AZP FTE Preparer or Contact First Contact Las[ Street or Street Name or"P.O. =tlatWar) dl DES APP# Facility Name Name Name Contact Email Title Residents Applicator PO Box Box" year) PenniM served (P/NAP) 2/18/2017 110604 Orange County Sanitation LaDlidITUry— District Ron Coss rmsa®acad,om Monitoring, 2,500,000 P 10844 Ellie Avenue Lagoonw Tanks or LINED Dry Tons Class Dry Tons City Zip Phone Drying Beds for ALL Sludge Stored (Nash) Ntemative# VAR# stored Class(NB/N) Am Neati.Is VAR# Y/N 01/01/'14 12131/14 Fountain 92708 (]14)593-]450 N 0 Valley Dry Tons Dry Tons in, Dry Tons Dry Tons To Facllty Mark"S"if reporting Dry Tons Received) stored from Daily Sludge From Facility(Name) Sludge sent (Name) Short Additions to Sent Away Hauler Phone Follow Up 01101113 Flow Received awe ,NOT Metric To, Slud a Hauler 0 95258.6113 ADEQ 2013 Biosolids or Sewage Sludge aP ^ �roUh Annual Report Mail signed printout ta:Robert Phalan,ADEQ Biosolids Coordinator 1110 W.Washington St., Phceniv,AZ 950D7 and email file to:biosolids@az .gov Dry Tons Clabs Fecal CI A Disposilion out Alterrrelie VAR To(ReeiPienl Name) Heiner Neap pplication wa' hed (AIBIN) Sal vem.(FIB) Phone Site Surface Unit Surface Unit LantlRll Landfill Landfill Composting 10237 B ZAppB(Ax3) 1 Synagrp GIC AZ Soils Transports Com ostin Composting Tec Etprass Land Apply 25001 B a,AppB(A)(3) 1 Tub D Ranch Western,Western, ol Ridge i Oxcart Rd e- Land Apply Land Apply Land Apply Land Apply Land Apply Land Apply Lend Apply Land Apply Land Apply Land Apply Land Apply Land Apply Land Apply Land Apply I cerfify,under penalty of tau+ thatthe iidcrmatinn and descriptions;have been made under myofirection and superniamn and untler a Isysteen designed to ensure that qualified peracrinel propery gether and evaluate the irdormatian usnd to tleteimine wheMer the applicable bloeolid6 requirements have been met.I am aware Ihat Mere are si nihmrd nelties fior false cedficefian indutlin the Sibilfty 1POWot one and imprisonment. APPENDIX E Biosolids Program History The history of OCSD's Biosolids Program is important to understand as we plan for the future. In order to maintain the integrity of this information for future generations, the historical information is maintained in this appendix. Program History • In 1971, OCSD entered into a long-term contract with Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Inc., a local fertilizer manufacturer, who hauled and composted the sludge off site. OCSD maintained contracts with Goldenwest Fertilizer Co. for several years until the firm lost their land lease for their composting operation in 1979. Contracts with other composting companies were also used during the 1970s. • In 1978, after notification that their contract with Goldenwest Fertilizer Co. would be ending in 1979, OCSD presented a proposal to the County of Orange to co-dispose sludge with municipal solid waste at Orange County landfills. Following approval by Orange County and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region (CRWQCB): OCSD established an air drying/composting site at Coyote Canyon landfill. OCSD used this site as a sludge-drying operation until 1981 when it was converted to an open-air composting facility. This was done to reduce odors and dry the sludge to the required 50% solids content prior to being blended with municipal solid waste. • The 50% solids requirement was set by the CRWQCB, by Order No. 79-55. In December 1982, the requirements were modified by Order No. 82-299. The new order reduced the required average solids content to 22.5%. In addition to the solids content requirements, the volume of refuse to sludge incorporated into the landfill was required to be a 10:1 ratio. After the new Order was issued and the treatment plant belt press dewatering system was installed, the air drying process was no longer needed and its operation was discontinued. • In 1974, OCSD began a cooperative regional sludge management study with the City of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the CRWQCB. By a joint powers agreement, the Regional Wastewater Solids Management Program for the Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area (LA/OMA Project) had a separate staff and budget to develop a long-term solids reuse or disposal plan, including an implementation strategy for the Los Angeles/Orange County metropolitan areas. This extensive, six-year, $4.0 million study, which covered all aspects of sludge processing and disposal, was completed in 1980. The conclusion was that each of the three entities would carry out its own sludge management program. For OCSD, land-based disposal and beneficial reuse were the study's preferred alternatives. 1 However, co-combustion and enclosed mechanical in-vessel composting alternatives at OCSD's Reclamation Plant No. 1 were added to OCSD's LA/OMA supplemental study when the recommended composting facilities were evaluated as being difficult to site. • In 1978 and 1983, OCSD brought activated sludge facilities online at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 respectively, which led to significant improvements of ocean water quality. By 1984, OCSD had replaced centrifuges that dewatered to about 20% with new belt presses at both plants. The new belt presses had to dewater to at least 22.5% in order to meet landfill requirements. As a result, waste activated secondary sludges were dewatered separately and sent to a private landfill. Clean Water Grant Funds aided in the construction of the important facilities improvements at Plant No. 2 including the activated sludge plant ($45 million) and sludge handling/process facilities ($30 million). • In November 1983, OCSD's Boards of Directors submitted a new Residual, Solids Management Plan to the EPA. The plan included both short- and long- tern compliance strategies. The short-term compliance plan involved the continued practice of trucking 22.5% solids to Coyote Canyon landfill for co- disposal with municipal waste until the landfill closed in March 1990. It also included hauling sludge to private landfills using OCSD's trucks or private contractors. The long-term plan included co-disposal at county landfills and off-site reuse/management by private contractors. • In November 1984, OCSD approved an interim sludge disposal program due to the limitation of the amount of sludge this could be co-disposed at Coyote Canyon. As part of this program, an agreement was made with BKK Corporation to take the balance of the sludge to the BKK-owned and operated landfill in West Covina (Los Angeles County). This contract expired in late 1991. • In 1987, OCSD began a facilities master planning effort that culminated in July 1989.The 1989 30-year master plan, "2020 Vision,' established 11 major objectives for maintaining our excellent record of environmental and public health protection including, "Sludge Reuse: OCSD will continue to promote multiple, beneficial reuse alternatives for sludge and strive to increase beneficial reuse from 60% to 100%. We will develop at least one in-county land disposal alternative as a backup to guarantee long-term reliability." The goals are summarized below: o Continue discussions with the County of Orange pertaining to landfill -Go- disposal options; o Pursue co-disposal options at out-of county landfills; o Continue and/or expand use of private contracts to reuse or dispose of sludge; 2 o Pursue with Orange County Environmental Management Agency staff the use of sludge as the final cover for Coyote Canyon's closure; o Monitor the status of the; o Initiate a regular status review of OCSD management program that would provide centralized information in one location; o Hire a full-time sludge manager to coordinate OCSD's overall sludge reuse/disposal program (completed in August of 1989). • The goals noted above led to a series of new recycling options starting in 1988 using three separate contractors. Two contracts were created with compost contractors, and one was created with an agricultural land fertilization contractor. Using these three contractors, OCSD recycled about 50% of their sludge from 1988-1991. • 1990: About 50% of the sludge is processed into compost by L. Curti Truck & Equipment and by Recyc; Inc., or applied directly to agricultural land by Pima Gro-Systems, Inc. The remaining 50% of the sludge is disposed in the BKK landfill in Los Angeles County. The dewatered sludge is hauled to the landfill and directly incorporated with municipal solid waste in conformance with operating requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles. Prior to March of 1990, landfill co-disposal was available at the Coyote Canyon landfill in Orange County and the BKK landfill. During this period 14% of the Districts' sludge went to Coyote Canyon and 36% went to BKK. • On June 24, 1991 a new solids handling storage facility (truck loading) was placed in service. Plant No. 1 Belt Press Dewatering Building M was placed in service in February 1983. Belt Press Dewatering Building C was placed in service in October 1988. By 2018, the belt presses will be replaced by centrifuges, the DAFTs will be replaced by thickening centrifuges, and truck loading will be rehabilitated. • Beginning in Beginning in November 1991, the Districts' Biosolids Management Program achieved a milestone of 100% beneficial reuse. Beneficial reuse allows the Districts to lower its management costs and eliminate the need to take up valuable landfill space. The program consisted of compost, direct land application, and a standby agreement to landfill the biosolids in the event of an emergency. Further benefits of switching to beneficial reuse was been a reduction in disposal costs. Beneficial reuse costed the Districts less than landfilling and was expected to become even more cost effective in the future as the market for compost material grows. About 73% of the biosolids are processed into compost by Pima Gro Systems, Inc. at the Riverside Recyc compost facility. The remaining 23% is applied directly to agricultural land by Ag Tech Company in Yuma, Arizona. 3 • During 1993-94, only one biosolids contractor was used to haul and manage the OCSD's biosolids produced by Plant No. 1. Pima Gro Systems, Inc. hauled the biosolids to the Recyc processing site in Riverside County where it was composted. The biosolids based compost was then sold to nearby farmers as a nutrient rich soil amendment and fertilizer. • In late 1994, the Ag Tech Company was contracted to use OCSD biosolids to enhance agricultural soils, reduce the amount of irrigation water needed, and provide a much needed source of organic humus. The biosolids were injected 6 inches to 15 inches beneath the surface (in the root zone) within hours of their arrival to permitted farm lands. • In June 1995, Bio Gro, a division of Wheelabrator Clean Water Systems, Inc., was added as a biosolids contractor. Biosolids were recycled on agricultural land in Riverside County. Pima Gro used commercial fertilizer spreaders to distribute the biosolids prior to incorporation on agricultural land in Kern County, California. • In March 1996, Tule Ranch was added as a biosolids contractor. Pima Gro was still recycling biosolids in Kern County, California, and Bio Gro was recycling biosolids in Riverside. No composting was reported. • In 1997, continued 100% beneficial reuse with all biosolids recycled via direct land application in Kern, Riverside, and San Diego counties. The Districts also entered into a one-year pilot project contract with Waste Conversion Industries, Inc. (WCI)to chemically treat and heat dry the Districts' biosolids at their Corona, California site. Due to mechanical difficulties, WCI was not able to process any of the Districts' biosolids. During fiscal year 1996-97, the Districts' biosolids management cost was reduced by approximately$1 million from that of fiscal year 1995-96. New and amended biosolids management contracts as well increased efficiency in the Districts' belt operation contributed to the decrease in biosolids management costs. Upon the expiration of the Ag Tech contract and the termination of the Hondo contract, the Districts maintained only two active biosolids management contractors, Bio Gro and . Pima Gro. In August 1996, having only two active biosolids management contractors, and receiving numerous unsolicited lower cost biosolids management proposals Districts' staff prepared and issued a Request for Proposals for Biosolids Management (RFP). The RFP was necessary in order to increase biosolids management diversity and reliability while decreasing costs. Eight biosolids management firms submitted proposals. Bio Gro proposed to maintain their existing contract, but unilaterally offered a pricing amendment, while Pima Gro submitted a new proposal that provided the Districts with the option of 4 accepting the entire proposal or modify the pricing structure of the existing contract. After extensive review and ranking of the proposals by staff, new contracts were offered to Tule Ranch and Waste Conversion Industries, Inc., while Bio Gro's and Pima Gro's existing contracts were amended to reflect their new price schedules. • In 1998 through 2000, continued 100% beneficial reuse with all biosolids recycled via direct land application in Kern, Kings, San Diego and Riverside counties. Pima Gro, Bio Gro, and Tule Ranch were OCSD's biosolids contractors. Small amounts of biosolids were composted at Pimo Gro's Riverside composting facility, Bio Gro's Arizona Soils facility in La Paz County, Arizona, and by Pima Gro for a t1CR Extension research project in Imperial County. • In June 2000, OCSD purchased 1,800 acres of Tule Ranch's farm in Kings County, California, to provide a reliable, long-term site for treatment and land application of biosolids. Tule Ranch contracted to manage OCSD's biosolids its farm at a reduced cost per ton. • In 2001, Synagro purchased Pima Gro and Bio Gro, and OCSD added Yakima as a contractor. One-hundred percent beneficial reuse via direct land application in Kern, Kings, San Diego, and Riverside. Synagro also recycled biosolids to tribal land farms in San Bernardino County, California. Small amounts were composted in Riverside and tribal land. In 2001, Riverside County issued an ordinance that banned the use of Class B biosolids for land application but allowed limited use of Class A biosolids. In 2003, the restrictions were expanded to address nuisance problems related to Class A biosolids. Kern County's Class A requirement (Class B ban) went into effect in early 2002, and King's County followed in 2003 with only composted biosolids allowed after 2006. • In 2002, as staff began work on a large-scale long-range biosolids management plan and contentious local county Class B land application bans were on the rise, OCSD began increasing diversification away from land application and added more composting in Riverside County. Biosolids were also recycled on Fort Mohave tribal land in Mohave County, Arizona and Clark County, Nevada. • October 28, 2002 Yakima Co. began operations at their new biosolids management site in La Paz County, Arizona. The operation involved biosolids air drying to achieve material greater than 50% total solids and use as alternative daily cover at La Paz Landfill. A total of 4,628.09 wet tons (881.7 dry metric tons)of biosolids were managed through this process through 5 2002. This amount represents about 2% of the total District's biosolids material beneficially reused in land application operations during 2002. The District discontinued its use of the Yakima Co. for management of its biosolids in early January 2003. The facility was later shut-down by the County of La Paz and a lawsuit was won against the County by Yakima for$9.2 million in damages. • In 2002, OCSD's Board of Directors voted to increase the level of treatment to full-secondary treatment requirements, which produced significantly more biosolids, especially between 2002 to 2005, until the new dewatering centrifuges could be constructed and implemented at each plant (2018-2020). OCSD's focus through the 2000's was on building the water-side capital facilities to meet this increased level of service. • In 2003, OCSD continued to encourage contractors to diversify its biosolids options, especially in Arizona and Nevada. OCSD started using Arizona Soils in La Paz County, Arizona on a regular basis. OCSD additionally piloted Tule Ranch's subcontractor, Universal, to utilize farms in Wellton and Dateland, Arizona for land application of about 6% of OCSD's biosolids. Tule Ranch's Class A lime stabilization process was started in order to continue recycling biosolids in Kern and Kings Counties. A small amount of biosolids was used in Maricopa County, Arizona. In addition, OCSD started using Solid Solutions to recycle biosolids in Nye County, Nevada to further diversify the biosolids management program. Solid Solutions was a subcontractor to California Soils Products who had a 2002 contract with OCSD to render biosolids into a treated soil product. By March 2004, OCSD pulled out of Nye because of a hearing with complaints from affected neighbors, local competition with dairy manure, and a letter from Nevada congressional representative, Harry Reid, whose brother was a local resident. This episode also captured the attention of the 2003-04 Orange County Grand Jury who performed an investigative study and published a report: htto://www.ocgrand'ury.org/odfs/blosolids.pdf. OCSD concluded its use of Solid Solutions in 2005 when it was clear that the Soil Products facility would not materialize. • In December 2003, OCSD finalized a Long Range Biosolids Management Plan that set forth the following recommendations to ensure a sustainable biosolids management program. These recommendations were implemented over the following decade. o Maintain at least three different product-manufacturing options at any given time. o Optimize capital and operations and maintenance (O&M) costs at OCSD's treatment plants as part of implementation of the long-range plan. 6 o Limit maximum participation for any market to one-half of the total biosolids production. o Limit biosolids management contracts to a maximum of one-third of total biosolids production per merchant facility, and one-half per contractor (for contractors with multiple product manufacturing facilities). o For each OCSD-owned product manufacturing facility, limit the size to one-half of the total biosolids production. o Explore funding options for in-county facilities (private capital, OCSD capital, or both). o Allocate up to 10 percent of biosolids for participation in emerging markets. o Pursue Orange County-based product manufacturing facilities and maximize the use of horticultural products within the OCSD service area by member agencies and through developing public-private partnerships. o Maintain capacity and options at OCSD's Central Valley Ranch. o Pursue failsafe backup options (landfilling, alternative daily cover for landfills, and dedicated landfilling) to acquire a 100 percent contingency capacity. • From November 1991 through December 2004, OCSD achieved 100 percent beneficial reuse of its biosolids mostly through the use of land application with some composting. • In 2004, OCSD started ramping up the land application in Arizona through Tule Ranch's Dateland operation, from about 10% in 2003 to 20% in 2004. OCSD also ramped up it's use of compost sites in California and Arizona from about 7% in 2003 to 20% in 2004. • In January 2005 and 2006, OCSD sent a small fraction of its biosolids to two landfills in Arizona (Copper Mountain and South Yuma County Landfill) in order to increase the diversity of its biosolids management options, as well as address the operational needs caused by wet weather periods. The routes to these two landfills were not impacted by severe weather. • Starting in 2006, Synagro eliminated their last remaining OCSD land application (Maricopa County), as fuel prices hit record highs, and focused on composting services. On December 27, 2006, Synagro's new composting facility (South Kern Compost Manufacturing Facility) came online. This was the first long-term contract to become operational as an outcome of the 2003 Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan. • In 2007, with OCSD's contract that guaranteed at least 250 tons per day to Synagro's new facility, OCSD's biosolids allocation to compost facilities expanded to its current level of about 50% of its total biosolids production. 7 These facilities have extensive permitting and regulatory oversight and reporting, improved public outreach with neighbors and local communities, and have more air quality and odor process controls. Today's framework is more sophisticated than what was in place two decades ago. Land application was also allocated about 50%. of OCSD's portfolio with half of that as lime-stabilized Class A in Kern County and half as Class B in Yuma County, Arizona. In March 2007, OCSD stopped actively using landfills and maintained this option only as a failsafe backup. OCSD re-gained its 100 percent recycling performance from 2008 through 2012 (excluding some digester cleanings). In August 2007, the Orange County Water District's (OCWD) Advanced Water Purification Facility, later called the Ground Water Replenishment System (GWRS), started taking an average of 30 MGD of Plant No. 1's secondary treated water to test their facility in purifying the water to meet drinking water standards. OCWD uses microfiltration and reverse osmosis, as well as ultraviolet (UV) disinfection. The water is used as a barrier for salt water intrusion and to recharge groundwater basins starting in January 2008. About 100 MGD of OCSD's secondary effluent produced about 70 MGD of purified water for reuse. Secondary effluent not sent to OCSD is sent as usual to Plant No. 2 to blends with treated wastewater from Plant No. 2 prior to ocean discharge through OCSD's 120-inch, 5-mile outfall. • In October 2008, Synagro's Regional Compost Facility in Riverside County stopped receiving OCSD biosolids in order to prepare for the site's closure. The facility's conditional use permit was not renewed by the County of Riverside after homes were developed nearby and residents filed hundreds of odor complaints. • In late 2008, OCSD stopped using Tule Ranch's farm in Kern County. This change in strategy culminated when the EnerTech facility started commissioning their process and Kern County required additional costly environmental studies to continue utilizing that option. OCSD's Kings County property was sold in December 2011. • As part of the 2003 Long Range Biosolids Management Plan implementation, OCSD issued a series of request for proposals in 2004. As a result, EnerTech Environmental, Inc. was awarded a 225-ton guaranteed-minimum contract in 2005, which was signed in May 2006. The Rialto facility was constructed and began commissioning on November 3, 2008. OCSD reallocated Tule Ranch's Kern County land application loads to EnerTech to meet contractual obligations. EnerTech's patented technology used heat and pressure to convert biosolids to a certified renewable energy pellet (E-fuel)that was burned as a replacement for coal in local cement kilns. EnerTech encountered a series of technical and permitting setbacks during the 8 commissioning process. During the start-up process, biosolids not processed at the Rialto facility were land-applied in Yuma County, Arizona by Terra Renewal (formerly Solid Solutions). In November 2010, EnerTech began implementation of a Single Train Technical Plan that was anticipated to address the issues and finish the commissioning process by March 2012. After a final extension and failure to meet contractual performance requirements, OCSD terminated its contract with EnerTech effective July 2012. OCSD re-allocated the EnerTech loads to our two remaining contractors, Synagro (composting) and Tule Ranch (land application), at about 50% each. • March 2009, OCSD began diverted settled sludge from Plant No. 1's primary clarifiers, along with about 2.5 MGD of belt press dewatering filtrate, to Plant No. 2's headworks, where they are mixed with the influent wastewater. OCSD built a new pump station at Plant No. 1, the Steve Anderson Lift Station, in order to bring more flow into Plant No. 1 to provide more flows to GWRS. However, the additional flows produced more solids than Plant No. 1 was equipped to handle during rehabilitation of its digesters and construction of its thickening and dewatering centrifuges, making the diversion of these solids to Plant No. 2 necessary. OCSD diverted the cationic dewatering filtrate to protect GWRS from the dewatering polymers. The sludge diversion is anticipated to continue until the new sludge thickening and dewatering facility (P1-101) at Plant No. 1 is operational in 2018 per the current CIP schedule. • In March 2010, OCSD sent a demonstration load to the City of Los Angeles Terminal Island Renewable Energy (TIRE) project via OCSD's contract with Tule Ranch. OCSD material was not compatible with their facility because the material required more screening than the City's biosolids. • In April 2010, Tule Ranch permanently moved their land application operations from Dateland, AZ to Yuma, AZ. • In January 2011, Tule Ranch formed an agreement with AgTech and managed OCSD biosolids at two sites (Desert Ridge and AgTech) in Yuma. The following year, Tule Ranch purchased the AgTech operations and integrated the two operations. Tule Ranch has continued land applying at both Yuma sites. • In 2012, OCSD met the new NPDES ocean discharge permit's treatment requirements for secondary treatment standards. With full secondary treatment facilities operational, the focus is now on asset rehabilitation, including solids treatment facilities. The Capital Improvement Program Annual Report (www.ocsd.com/CIPAnnual) summarizes the projects and their progress. 9 • In February and March 2012, OCSD's Plant No. 2 biosolids exceeded the Arsenic Table 3 Exceptional Quality Limit for fields 23110121, 2311013, 2311021, and 2311022, but were below Table 1 Ceiling Concentrations. OCSD's land application contractor, Tule Ranch, already reports Table 2 Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rates for all pollutants and all fields as part of their annual report to the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. • As directed by the Board's November 2011 Strategic Plan direction, OCSD executed an agreement with Orange County Waste and Recycling (OCWR) to manage up tol00 tons per day of OCSD's biosolids at the Prima Deshecha landfill located in the city of San Juan Capistrano, California. This alternative provides OCSD a local biosolids management option during projected peak biosolids production period until 2017. As a result of the landfill start-up in 2013, OCSD is recycling about 94-97% of its biosolids, with the remaining biosolids going to the OCWR landfill. Landfill loads do not count towards recycling despite the indirect energy production from capturing methane onsite. OCSD sends the landfill about 1 truck per day of grit and screenings (non-recyclable material) and 3 trucks of biosolids per day (5 days per week when not impacted by rain) in order to keep some revenues and resources in-County (see also OCSD Biosolids Policy Board Resolution 13-03: ocsd.com/oolicv. However, after residential complaints about odor in late 2016, biosolids loads to the landfill were on hiatus until operations moved further away from the phase of the housing development that opened in Fall of 2016. With the heavy rains received December through February 2017, the landfill was operating in a different section, and OCSD remained on hiatus. • In 2015, OCSD awarded a professional engineering services contract for developing a new Biosolids Master Plan. The Biosolids Master Plan will meet one of the goals in OCSD's 5-year Strategic Plan (www.ocsd.com/5vearstrategicr)lan) , which is to recommend future biosolids management options, as well as recommending and providing design of capital facility improvements for a 20-year planning period. The Plan is anticipated to be published in spring 2017. • OCSD is replacing the belt filter presses with new dewatering centrifuge facilities, which are scheduled to start service in 2018 for Plant No. 1 and in 2020 for Plant No. 2. As a result, the total percent solids of digested biosolids is anticipated to increase from 18-22% to 30%, resulting in approximately one-third fewer solids to manage. In addition, this project is also bringing pre- digestion thickening centrifuges to replace the dissolved air Floatation thickening at Plant No. 1, and will rehabilitation the Plant No. 1 truck loading facility. 10 • In November 2016, the Kern Measure E (2006) biosolids ban was struck down. A Tulare County Superior Court judge ruled that Kern County Measure E is invalid and unlawful. The Judge found that Measure E, the ordinance banning land application of biosolids in the unincorporated areas of the county, is preempted by state recycling laws and exceeded Kern's police powers. The judge granted a permanent injunction against enforcing Measure E. • The Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) discharges its untreated solids (sludge) to OCSD. IRWD is currently constructing their own solids treatment facility and plans to cease sending their solids to OCSD by 2018. This cessation is anticipated to reduce Plant No. 1's influent solids by 10-15%. Biosolids Production History 350.000 900 x 000 300,000 M—�i 7f Y 700 _ 250,000 • J Y 600 9 X' 200,000 —� � 500 m 150.000 400 0 0 300 a mo,o0o C �P1-wellanz a` �pz-.a1mm 200 W� T.1 11 d 12 --,r•-TOm pPf COy 100 Calendar Year Figure 1: Biosolids Production History from January 1992— December 2016 Biosolids Program Policy 11 Originally adopted in 1999 and amended in 2006 and 2013, OCSD's Resolution 13-03 (www.ocsd.com/oolicv), established a policy that commits the agency to support biosolids beneficial reuse (organics recycling). The resolution states OCSD is committed to: • A sustainable biosolids program. • Diversifying its portfolio of offsite biosolids management options with multiple biosolids contractors, markets, facilities, and maintaining fail- safe back-up capacity at least 100% of its daily biosolids production. • Supporting the recycling of biosolids. • Striving to balance financial, environmental, and societal considerations when making biosolids decisions. • Utilizing a biosolids management system to maintain a sustainable and publicly supported biosolids program. • Researching and implementing ways to reduce the volume of biosolids at the treatment plants to minimize the need for offsite management. • Declaring its support of continuing to research biosolids benefits and potential safety concerns. • Demonstrating the benefits of biosolids compost by using it at the OCSD's facilities. 12 APPENDIX F EPA Biosolids Annual Report Electronic Form for Reporting Year 2016, Plant No. 1 EPA Biosolids Annual Report Electronic Form for Reporting Year 2016, Plant No. 2 plat Sewage Sludge (Biosolids)Ann03.48port FPARegulations-503.18,503.28,503.48 INSgRUCDONS PRA'ssewage sludge regulations(4013'R ap rt 5031 requite certain POWs and Class l sewage sludge management facilities to submit to an annual biosolids report.POTYs that must submit an annual report include POT s with a design Row rate equal to or greater than one million gallons per day,and POIWs that serve 10,000 people or more.]his is the bwsolids annual report form for PO'IWs and(]ass Isewage sludge management facilities in the 42 states and afihiltes and centuries where FPAadmwuters the Fedemlbiosolids pmgmm. For the purposes ofthis form,the term'sewage sludge also refrs to the material that is commonly reerred to as biosolids.'FPAdoes not have a regulatory definition for biosolids but this material is commonly truncated to as wage sludge that is placed on,or applied to the had to use the beneficial properties ofthe material as a said amendment,conditioner,or fierti ieer.PPA%use ofthe term biosoMs'in this fo®is to confirm that information about beneficullyused sewage sludge(aka.bmsofids)shouW be reported on this form. Please note that questions with a(4)are required.Please also note that ERAmay contact you after you submit this report for more information regarding your sewage sludge program. Questions regarding this form should be directed to the NPDFS Electronic Reporting Uelpdeskac •NPDFSeRepommgQpa.gov OR •1-877-2274965 What action would you hike to take?' New 9osoids Pmgmm Report I.Program Infnrmatiun Please select the NPDFS m number below for this Sewage Sludge(9osolids)Annual Report.' C l 10604:Omnge County SD 41 Ifyou do not see the NPDFSD associated with your facility,please Cancel and within the Forms tab submit aNPDFS0 Access Request.Complete instructions are available in the BmsoRds Users Guide at blipsl/ e metaendeskcom/hc/en-us/sectlon/207108787- neml-osofids Facility Name:Orange County SD#1 Street: 10844 Ellis Avenue City:FOUNTAIN VA= State:CA Zip Code:92708-7018 1.1 Please selectee kartone ofthe following optionspenaining to yourobhgation to submit a Sewage Sludge d3iosohds)Annual Report in comphaace with 40S 503.11ie facilityis:' Za POT9with a design Flow rate equal to or greater than one million gallons per day Z a P07[4that serves 10,000 people or more Z a Class I Mudge Management Fetidness defined in 40 M5039 otherwise required to report(e.g.,permit condiliogenforeement action) ❑ none ofthe above Page 1 of 29 1.2 Reporting Period Start and ad Dates Start Date ofReporting Period• ad Date ofReportmg Period• 01-01-2016 12-31-2016 2.Facilitymfrmation 2.19osofids or Sewage Sludge Treatment Processes Please check the box net to the following biosofids or sewage sludge treatment processes that you used on the sewage sludge or bioaoPda generated or produced at your facility during the reporting period(check one or more that apply).* Pathogen Reduction Operations(see App andix Bto Part 503) Physical Treatment Operations Processes to Significantly Reduce Pathogens(PSRPI ® Preliminary Operations(e.g.,sludge grhrd'mg,degrittmg,blending) Aembie Digestion ® 9hickenmg(e.g,gravity and/or flotation thickening,centrifugation,belt fikerpress,vacuum filter) Air Lkymg(or`sludge drying beds') ❑ Sludge Lagoon ® Anaerobic Oigestion Other Processes to Manage Sewage Sludge ❑ Lower Temperature Composting ❑ Temporary Sludge Storage(sewage sludge stored on land 2 years or less,not m sewage sludge unit) ❑ Lime Stab Rication ❑ Long-term Sludge Storage(sewage sludge stored on land 2 years or more,not in sewage sludge unit) Processes to Further Reduce Patbonena(PPRP) ® Methane orRagas Capture and Recovery Lfigher Temperature Composting ❑ Other Treatment Process: Lbat Drying(e.g,flash dryer,sproydryegromry dryer) LLeat Treatment(Liquid sewage sludge is heated to temp.of356T(or I80`Qorhgher for 30 min.) Thermophik,Aerobic Digestion ❑ Bata Ray Irradiation ❑ Gamma Rayhradiation ❑ Pasteurization 2.2 Ek sofids or Sewage Sludge Analytical Methods EPA mgulatons specify that representative samples ofsewage sludge that is applied to the land,placed on a suffice disposal site,or fired in a sewage sludge numerator must be collected and analyzed,these regulations also specify the analytical methods that must be used to analyze samples ofsewage sludge.For example,EPArequhes facilities to monitor for the certain parameters,which are listed in Tables 1,2,3,and d at 40 CPR503.13 and nbles 1 and 240 QT1503 23.See also 40 CFR503.8. Please check the box net to the following analytic methods used on the sewage sludge or bioaolids generated or produced byyou or put facility during the reporting period(check one or more that apply) Parameter Method Number or Author Descrip tion Text for Certification Section Pathogens Sludge Monitoring-Ascaris ova. Sludge Monitoring-Awaris ova,"Method for the Recovery and Assay ofTotal CultumbleWuses mom Sludge(Appendix lk- lsscaria ova. ControlofPathogens and Vector Attmetion m Sewage Sludge',EPA-625-R-92-013,July 2003 Other Awaris ova.Analytical Method: Page 2 of 29 Parameter Method Number or Author Descrip tion Text for C rtiHcation Section ASTM Method D4994-Enteric Causes AS1MMethod D4994-Emetic Manses,"Standard Practice fr Recovery ofMruses From Wastewater Sludges,"ASTM International Enteric comes Other Enteric Causes Analylical Method: � Standard Method 9222-Fecal Colform Standard Method 9222-Fecal Caliimar,'5tandard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater;'American Public Healtb Association[Note:This method is only allowable fin Class Bsewage sludge] Standard Method 9221-Fecal Orlin. Standard Method 9221-Fecal Colifonn,'5tandard Methods bar the Examination of Water and Wastewater,"American Public Health Association Fecalcobfcar F1EPAMelbod 1680-Fecal Colform EPAMethod 1680-Fecal CoBfonq'Pecal CoBformsw Sewage Sludge by[vuniple-Tuba Fermentation using leury[4yptose Foods � EPAMethod 1681-Fecal Colman and EC3Aedmm,"EPA-821-] 10-003,Apd2010 EPAMethod 1681-Fecal Colformr Fecal Colfonms in Sewage Sludge(Biosolds)by MuhipleTube Fermentation using hl Other Fecal Colifnn Analytical Method: medium,FPM21-Ib04-027,1uae 2005 WA Ymko Method-Hehmmth ova. WA Yanko Method-Elesmith Ova,"Occurrence of Pathogens in Distribution and Marketing MunicipalSludges," 1Jelnumb ova. HE'"00-1-87-014,1987 Other Helminth ova.Analytical Method: Standard Method 9260-Sahonella Standard Method 9260-Salmonella,'Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,"American Public Health Association EPAMethod 1692-Saluone8a EPAMethod 1682,"Salmonella in Sewage Sludge(Rowboat by Modeled Semisold Rappaport-Cassiliadis(MSRV)Medium," Sahnouella sP �cterla EPA.821-E-06-014,July 2006 ❑ Renner and Clark Metbod-SSMonella Fenner and dark Method-Sslmonella,`DeteCtinn and Enumeration ofSahnonella and Pseudommus aemginosa:1.Water ❑ Other Salmonella sp.Bacteria Analytical Method: Pollution Control Federation,46(9C 163-2171,1974 Class ASludge Monitoring-Total Odmrable Manses HPA Class A Sludge Monitoring-Total Columb le Manses,"Method bar the Recovery and Assay oflotal Cultumble Causes Som Total Culturable Manses Sludge(Appendix H),"Control ofPathogens and M:etor Attraction in Sewage Sludge,ll`"25-Ib92-013,July 2003 Other Total Clrhurable Manses Analytical Method: Metals ® EPAMethod 6010-Arsenic OU-06) EPA Method 6010-Arsemc(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission SpeUrometqk'Test Methods far Evafatmg Solid Waste,Phys"Vdnemical Methods,"EPAPnb.SW-846 � EPAMethod 6020- irmork("-MS) EPA Method 6020-Arsenic inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ Chemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 Arsenic � EPAMethod T010-Arsenic(tTh-AAS) EPA Method 9010-Arsenic(Cvaphits Mmace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry),'Test Methods for EAaluating Solid Waste, EPAMethod 9061-Ansenic(AA- pl PhysicaVClumical Methods('EPA Pub.SW-846 EPA Method'l061-Arsenic(Atomic Absorption-Gaseous Hydrate),'Test Methods An Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaVQemical Other Arsenic Anayical Method Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ® EPAMethod 6010-Berllium 0CP-0ES) EPA Method 6010-Beryllium(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),'Test Methods fr EYaluating Solid Waste,PhysisaVChem ical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 F] EPAWflimf 6020-Bery41Um(ICP-MS) EPA Method 6020-Beryllium(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrametrya'Teat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, PhysicaVUemical Methods,"EPA Pub.5 W-846 BeryPium � IPAMethod T000-Beryllium(FAAS) EPA Method 9000-Beryllium Maine komic Absorption SpecumphotometUT'Test Methods bar Evaluating Sold Waste,Physical/ EPAMethod T010-Beryllium acroical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 (Qr-Aqq) EPA Method 7010-Baryfum(Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectmphotometry),'Test Methods fin Evaluating Solid Other Wryllurm Analytical Method Waste,PhyscaVOremical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 Page 3 of 29 Parameter Method Number or Author Ecscrip Non Text for Csrti6cation Section ® IPAMetbod 6010-Cadmium(1CP-OW EPA Method 6010-Cadmvrm(lvductsely Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),"hst Methods fir E duatwg Solid Waste,Physical/Oaemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ❑ EPAMetbod 6020-Cadmium 0e-W EPAMethod 6020-Cadmlum(fndurthrcbbupled Plasma-Mess Spectromctry),'Ted Methods for Evaluating S Iid Waste, EPAMethod 7000-Cadmium(FAAS) PhysieaVChcmiwl Methods,"EPAPub.W-846 Cadmium ❑ EPAMethod 9000-Cadmlum(Wame Atomic Absorption$pectrophotometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaV ❑ EPAMMWod 7010-Cedmium(OF-AAS) Otemical Msthoda,"EPAPub.SW-846 EPAMethod 7010-Cadmium(Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry),^test Methods for Evaluating Sobd ❑ EPAMethod 7131-Cadmium(GF-AAS) Waste,PhysieaVOremieal Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ❑ abet Cadmium Analytical Method: IPAMethod 7131-Cadmium(Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometryh'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaVastrical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ® EPAMetbod 6010-Chromatin f"-OES) EPAMethod 6010-ammium dnduetively Coopled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),'Test Methods mr Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaVOrcm nal Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ❑ EPAMMWod6020-mrommm(ICP-MS) IPAMethod 6020-a romium deductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'TbdMethods for Evaluating Sohd Waste, PhysiwVOumical Methods,"IPAPub.W-846 ❑ FPAMethod]000-(Lromvm(FAA$) EPAMethod]Oo0-ammium(Planes Atoms Absorption Spectrophotomstryh"hst Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Otromium ❑ EPAMethod 7010-Chmmmm(Cf-AAS) PhyaicaVOremsal Methods;'EPAPub.SW-846 MA Method 7010-Oiromium(Graphite pomace Atomic Absorption Spectrophoom elry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid ❑ IPAMelhod 7191-(bmmium Waste,Ph,k.VOrcmical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 (A Ff) IPAMethod 9191-ammium(Atomic absorption-FurnaceTechnique),'Teat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ Otherllromwn Analytical Method: Otemical Methodic,"EPAPub.SW-846 ® EPAMetbod 6010-Capper(1CP-OES) FPAMethod 6010-Copper(hrduclively Coupled Plasma-Optical Finission 5pernmactry),7esl Methods forlbaluatmg Solid Waste,PhysicaVaemical Methodic,"FPAPub.SW-846 EPAMethod 6020-tbpper(ICP-MS) IPAMethod 6020-Capper(Inductively Coupled Palma-Mass Specmcmetry),'Teat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ Oremical M athoda,"EPAPub.SW446 Capper ❑ EPAMeNod 7000-Copper(FAA$) IPA Method]000-Capper(Home Atomic Absorption Spectrophotumetry),'Teat Methods for Evaluating Sohd Waste,Physical/ ❑ EPAMethod]010-Copper(GF- Chemical Methods,"EPANI,.SW346 AAS) EPAMethod]010-Capper d5raphde Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectropbotometryb'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, ❑ Other Capper Analytical Method: Physical/a,ra al Methods;'EPAPub.SW--846 ® IPAMethod 6010-lead(IP-OES) EPA Method 6010-Icadanduetively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),^feat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, PhyeicaVOmmical Methodic;'EPA Pub.SW-846 ❑ EPAMcthod 6020-lend 0CP-MS) FPA Method 6020-I ad(Nductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry)'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical, EPAMethod 7000-Lead(FAAS) Chemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 fead ❑ EPA Method 7000-Icad(Home Atomic Absorption SpectrophotomertI'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ IPAMetbod 9010-land(C£-AAS) Chemical Methods,"FPAPub.SW-846 IPA Method 7010-lead(Gmphde Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectropbotometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Sohd Waste, ❑ EPA Method 7421-Iead(AA-Fl) Physlc.Facmiral Matbods;'IPA Pub.W-846 EPA Method]421-lead(Atomic Absorption-Furnace Techniquet'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,MysicaVUemical ❑ OIM1erlead Analytical Method: Methods,'EPAPub.SW446 ® EPA Metb.d 7471-Memory(CVAA) EPA Method 7471-Mercury in Solid or Semi-Solid Waste(Cohl Vapor Atomic Absoprtion),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Mere. Waste,Physicailacenical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ❑ OIM1er MercuryAnalNical Method: Page 4 of 29 Parameter Method Number or Author Description Text for Certification Section ® EPAMetbod 6010-Molybdenum(IB-06) EPA Method 6010-Molybdenum(fnductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Prussian Spectrometry),'Test Methods bar aahadng Solid Waste,Physicallaemical Methodsf FPAPub.SW-846 ❑ EPAMetbod 6020-Moybdenum(17P-MS) EPAMethod 6020-Molybdenum(Inductivelyaupled Plasma-Mass Spectromenj7est Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, ❑ EPAMetbod 7000-Molybdenum(FAAS) PhysicaVaemical Methods"EPAPub.SW--846 EPAMethad 7000-Molybdenum(Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometryx'Test Methods fr Eauating Solid Waste, Molybdenum ❑ ppAM,dmd]010-Molybdenum(GF-AAS) Physic.DCbcmical Methods"FPAPub.W-846 EPAMethod 7010-Molybdenum(G sphhe Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry),'Tesl Methods for Evaluating Solid ❑ EPAMethod 7481-Molybdenum Waste,PhysicaVChemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 (M-FT) FPAMelhod]481-Molybdenum(Atomic Absorption-Fumace Technique),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaV ❑ Other Molybdenum Analytical Method: Chemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW4146 ® EPAMMM1od 6010-NirIacW-OES) EPAMethod 6010-Nickel(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),'rest Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaVaem ical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ❑ FPAMethod 6020-Mhckel(ICP-MS) EPAMmhod 6020-Nickel(Induclively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Test Mletbods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaV Nickel EPAMet cal 7000-Mhckel(FAAS) aemical Mothoda,"EPAPub.SW4146 ❑ EPAMethod 7Oo0-Nickel(Flame Atom's Absorption Spectrophotometry),'Test Methods fin Evaluating Solid Waste,PhyssaV ❑ EPAMetbod 7010-Nic1m1(GF- aemical Methods,"FPAPub.SW446 AAS) EPAMethod 7010-Nickel((haphite Pomace Atomic Absorption Spectropbotomary),'Test Methods for&aluating Solid Waste, ❑ Other Nickel Analytical Method: Mysical/aemical Methods('EPAPub.SW--846 ® EPAMetbod 6010-Selenium(ICP-0ES) EPAMethod 6010-Selemium(Inductnailyauped Plasma-Optical Enission Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhydcaVaemical Methods,"EPAPob.SW-846 ❑ EPAMethod 6020-Selenium9P-MS) EPA Method 6020-&dermin flnbseively aupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Test Methods fer Analuatlug Solid Waste, PhysicaVaernical Methods"EPA Pub.SW-846 ❑ EPAMothod]010-Selenium(GF-AAS) MA Method 7010-Selenium(GrapMte Furnace Atomic Absorption SpectmphmometryZ lest Methods for Evaluating Solid Selenium ❑ EPAMethod]]40-Rdenhm(A Ff) Waste,Physieallandical Methods;EPAPob.SW-846 EPA Method]]4IA-Selenium(Atomic Absorption-Furnace Techniquex'Test Methods bar fvaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ EPAMeWod]]41-Rdenum Chemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 (AMGfq EPA Method]]41-Selenium(Atomic Absorption-Gaseous Hydrue),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Myseavaemical ❑ Other Selenium Analytical Method: Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 ® EPAMetbod 6010-Lac(1B4]FS) EPAMethod 6010-Zinc(fductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Enission Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, PhysicaVaemical Methods"EPAPub.SW-846 ❑ EPAMetbod 6020-Zmc(ICP-W) EPAMethod 6020-Zise(InductivelyCoupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry), est Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ Chemical Methods,"FPAPub.SW446 live ❑ FPAMethod]000-Zfe(FAAS) EPA Method]000-Zinc(Flame Aomic Absorption SpeclmphotometryZ 7est Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ EPAMetbod 7010-Zhc(GF-AAS) Chemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 EPA Method 7010-Zmc(Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption SpectrophotometryZ'Test Methods far Evaluating Solid Waste, ❑ Other2mr Analytical Method: Physical/aemical Methods,"EPA Pub.SW--846 Nitrogen ampounds ❑ EPAMethod 350.1-Ammonia Ndrogen EPAMethod 350A-AmmonaNtrogen,"Determmatfn ofeunmonia Nitrogen by&md-,A tomated aorimetry,"Angust 1993 Ammonu Nitrogen ® Standard Method 4500-NH3-Ammonia Nitrogen Standard Method 4500-NEB-Ammonia Nitrogen,"Standard Methods fin the Examination of Water and Wastewater"American Pub he Feakh Association ❑ Other Ammonia Nitrogen Analytical Method Page 5 of 29 Parameter Method Number or Author Descrip tion Text for 4rti6catiov Section � EPAMethod 9056-Nitrate Nitrogen(IC) EPAMethod 9056-Nitrate Nitrogen(en Ormmatogmphy),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical,asmical Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 � EPAMetb.d 9210-Nitrate Nbmgen OSE) EPAMethod 9210-Nitrate Nitrogen Orn-Selective Hectrode),Test Methods for Festooning Solid Waste,PhyncaVQremical Methods,"EPAPub.SWb46 ® OIM1er Nitate Nitrogen Analytical Method: PA 300.0 Nitrate Nitrogen Standard Method 4500-N-Nitrogev Standard F Method 4500-N-Nitrogen,"Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater;'American Public Health Nkmgen Association (titer Nitrogen Melytical Method- Standard Method 4500-Norg-Organic Nitrogen Standard Method 4500-Norg-Organic bumper,Ikandard Metbods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,"Amercan Public Health Association ® OIM1er Organic Ntrogen Analytical Method: Calculation Organic Nitrogen ® FPAMeWod 351.2-Total lfjehlahl Nitrogen EPA Method 3512-Total IgeldaM1lNuragen,'Determnation ofTotal lfjeldAl Nitrogen by Semi-Automated Colorimetry;'August Total l(leldahl Nitrogen 1993 Other Total lGeWahl Nitrogen Analytical Method: Other Analytes Standard Method 2540-Fixed Solids Standard Method 2540-Total,fixed,and volatile solids,"Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater;' Fired Solids American Puble Health Association Other Fixed Solids Analytical Method: ® EPAMetbod 9095-Paint Fiber liquids Test EPA Method 9095-Fund Fiber Equals Test,7cat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhyssaVacmical Methods;'EPAPub. Pant Filter Test SW-946 Other Pant Filter Test Analytical Method: � EPAMethod 9040-pHFs 7%wide) EPAMsthod 9040-PHF,7%solicish'Test Methods for Evaluating Soled Waste,PhyseaVOremcal Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 PH ® EPAMetbod 9045-PH(17%solids) EPAMethod 9045-pH(>7%sohds),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physkavaemical Methods;'EPA Pub.SW-846 Other pH Malytical Method: Standard Method 2710-SOUR Standard Method 27 10-Specific Oxygen Uptake Fine,"Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater;' Specific Oxygen Uptake American Public Health Association Rate Other Specific Oxygen Uptake Fate Analybeal McWod: ® EPAMethod 13 11-Toxicity Q,erectereic leaching EPA Method 1311-Toxicity Qrmaderistic leaching Procedure,'Test Methods for Ealuatng Sold Waste,PhyseaVQremical TQP Procedure Methods,"EPAPub.5W446 OtherA Analytical Method: Page 6 of 29 Parameter Method Number or Author I scription Text for Certification Section Standard Metbod 2550-Temperature Standard Method 2550-Temperature,"Standard Methods for the Examinaton of Water and Wastewater,"American Public Health Temperature Association Other TemperatureAnalytical Method: ® Standard Method 2540-Total Solids Standard Method 2540-Total,fixed,and volatile solids,"Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" Total9olicis American Public l akh Association Other Total Solids Analytical Method: ® Standard hletbod 2540-Wlutde Solids Standard Method 2540-Total,fixed,and volatile solids,'Standard Methods 6r the Examwatwn of Water and Wastewater" Wlatile Sokds American Public Health Jassociation Other W lane Solids Malylical Method: No Analytical Methods No Analytical Methods Used 23 What is the estimated total volume off,imoluds or sewage sludge produced at your facility for the reporting period(in dry metric tons)?' 24819 3.9osokds or Sewage Sludge Management EPANPDM regulations at 40 M503 only require reporting fun Idud applicatwn,surface disposal,or incwemtion.You have the option to select"Other Management Practice-dpuwish to provide more mfurmatnn on how you manage your sewage sludge or bwsolids. Please use the selections below to Identify how sewage sludge or biosodds generated or produced at your facility was managed,used,or disposed by you or your factory for the reporting pound.You can use the button below to add as many Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(S )sections as needed to describe how you manage your sewage sludge. SSUD Sect ion Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(SSM):001 Management Practice Type Handler or Preparer Type* Management Practice Detail* Land Application Off-Ske Thhd-Party Handleror Preparer Agmulturalland Applicaton Please Note:lend Application includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give away)of©ass AEQ. Palk or Beg/Oonmircr' Pathogen Mis• Whore Amount(drymemie tons)' Bulk agaab, 718 Pollutant Ibncentrations: DW the buddy land apply bulk sewage sludge when one or more pollutant contaminations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentration in Table 3 of40OFH503A ? OYes Qi No O Unknown Name of Off-Site]hind-Party Handler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information for the OR-Site Thud-Party Handler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier.You may optionally lookup aNPDES D to auto-populate this insinuation.Iffields remain blank after clicking the Inok Up button,then no data mutts and you must enter the information Off-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer Information NPDFSO(ifknown) Page 7 of 29 Facilay/Company Name" T le Ranch/Ag-Tech Addrea 43N E Ashlan Ave. ay" State" Zip Code" Fresno "mu 93726 Off-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer Contact Information First Name• lest Name Title' Sheen Megan Owner Phone(10digits,No dashes)* W. &Mad Address' 5599709432 kart&a stexp.com Mosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to s entify the pathogen reduction options used by your facility far this sewage sludge unque identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply). Cade Pathogen Reduction Option Class A(must also demonstrate that meet fecal col8ann or salmonella limits) ❑ BI Class B-Ahemative I Fecal Callum Geometric Mean B21 Class BAltematiro 2 PSRP L Aerobe Digestion R22 CcmMemative 2 PSRP 2:An Drying ® B23 Class gNtermarw 2 PSRP 3:Anaerobic Digestion B24 Class Memative 2 PSRP 4:Composting B25 Class PAltemative 2 PSRP 5:IBne Stabilization ❑ H3 Class Mernative 3:PSRP Equivalency ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Page 8 of 29 Bioselids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by put facility or anotherperson/facilitytorthis sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply). Vector Attraction Reduction Options ® VR1 Option l-Volntde Sohds Reduction VR2 Option 2-Bench-Scale VAntfre Solids Reduction(Anaerobic Beach Teat) ❑ VR3 Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aimmue Beach Test with Percent Solids ofTwo percent or less) VR4 Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake are ❑ VR5 Option 5-Aerabic Prociaeng Obennophilic Aerobic Digestion/Composting) VR6 Option 6-Alkaline Treatment W Option 7-Drying(Bgnot to or Greater than 95 Percent) mut Option 8-Drymg(FA ual to or Greater than 90 Percent) VR9 Option 9-Sewage Sludge Injection ® MU Option I0-Sewage Sludge Thaely incorporation into land ❑ VRII Option II-Sewage sludge Covered at the End ofPach Operating Day Noncomn liamce Renaming Please use the check boxes below to militate any noncompliance with FPA's Federal sewage sludge program requirements(see 40 CFR503)for this facility during the reporting period.FPAnotes that any person who prepares sewage sludge(i.e.,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a material from sewage sludge)shall ensure that the applicable requirements in FPA's biombds regulations(40 CFR503)are met when the sewage sludge is applied to the land,placed on a surface disposal site,or feed in a sewage sludge incinerator(see 40Q 5039). Enna application Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or sold or gave away sewage sludge in a bag or other container when one ormore pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a land application telling pollutant limit(sac Table 1 of40 CFR503 13). Facility Failed to properly collect and analyze its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequency and approved analytical methods to order to obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding times)(see permit requirements and 40(M003 8). Facility had deficiencies with pathogen reduction(see 40 CFR509 321. ❑ Facility bad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 CFR 503331. Mal application ofbulk sewage sludge likely to adversely affeoted a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 ofthe Endangered Species Act orits designated criticalhabitat(see 40i 0914laN. Brlksewage sludge was app Red to agnouhural land,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation she that was flooded,frozen,or snow-covered such that the bulksewage sludge entered a wetland orotherwaters of the United States,as defined to 40 CPR 122 2 except as provided in a permit aimed pursuant to Section 402 or 404 ofthe(AA(sec 40 CFR 503 14(hl). ❑ Bilk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,or reclamation site was 10 meters or less from waters ofthe United States,as defined io 40 C711122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authomy(see 40 CFR503.I4(c)l. Bulk sewage sludge was appbed to agr cultuml land,forest,a pub he contact site,or reclamation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate for the bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofs reclamation site,otherwise specified by the permitting authority(see 40 M503.14I1)), Page 9 of 29 One or more label or information sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given may for land application hee 40Q 50314(ell. Hrkc sewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 4503 13(b)(21 have been reached. The required notice and information was not provided to the land application applier(see 40 CFR503 12(A and fell. The requited notice and orientation was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40(PR503.12f it). The warned notice was not provided to the permitting authority forthe Stale nt which bulk sewage sludge was applied tithe bulk sewage sludge was applied to land in a Slate other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40 C R503 IN)and 6p ❑ 'Ilia facility faded to keep the necessary records for preparers and appliers during the reporting period(see 40 CFR50327) When sewage sludge that meets acts Bpathogen reduction requirements,but not Qass A is applied to the land,additional site restrictions must be met.Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPA'sFedeml sewage sludge aass Bpathogen reduction requirements(see 40 M50331 for this facility during the reporting period. Food crops with harvested pans that touched the sewage sludge/soil mature(such as melons,cucumbers,squash,etc.)were harvested witbin 14 months after application ofsewage sludge(see 40 CFR503 320b951 Vail crops with harvested pans below the soil surface(root crops such as potatoes,tarots,radishes)were harvested within 20 months after application ofsewage sludge and the sewage sludge remained on the Ind surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil(see 60 CFR50332fbN5NJ11. Food crops with harvested parts below the sod surface(root crops such as potatoes,carrots,rodishes)were harvested within 38 months after application ofthe sewage sludge and the sewage sludge remained on the land surface for ess than for months priorto incorporation into the soil(see 40 GFR503.32(b)(5)(it Food crops,fed crops,and hoer crops were harvested within 30 days after application ofsewage sludge(me 40 GFR 50332fbN5 hhoR Animals were grand on a site within 30 days after application ofsewage sludge(see 40 CFR503 32(b)(5Nv)). ❑ Tudwas harvested within 1 year after application ofsewage sludge ifthe turfwas placed on land with a high potential for public exposures or lawn,unless otherwise specified by the perm@ting authority(see 40 M50332(b)(5Yvi11. Public access to land with high potential for public exposure was not restricted for 1 year after application ofsewage sludge(see 40 CFR503.32fbN5Nvulk Public access to land with a low potential for public exposure was not restricted mr30 days after application ofsewage sludge(see 40 CFR503 32fbN5Nviiill. SSUIDsectiou Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(SSUm):002 Management Practice Type" Handleror Preparer Type Management Precrice Detail' Other Management Practice Off-Skeghkd-Party Handleror Preparer Disposal in a Municipal lendfill(under 40 M258) Please Note:Unit Application includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give away)ofQass ABQ. ®Aker BaglContamer" Pathogen pace" Whore Amount(drymetflc tons)" Bulk I Mai 1260 Name of Off-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following infnnation for the Off--Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique lientifier.You may optionally lookup a"DES m to auto-populate this information.Iffields remain blank after clicking the Lmk Up button,then no data exists and you must enter the automation Off-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer Information "DES m(iflarl Page 10 of 29 Facilay/Company Name" Orange County Waste and Recycling,prima Deshecha Landfill Md.. 32250 La Pala Aim. ay* State" Zip Code" San hav Caputmno Tito-- 926/5 Off-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer Contact Information Fast Name• Lest Name title' Greg Dayak Landfill Operarlons Superintendent Phone H 0digits,No dashes)• Pat. &Mad Address' 9497283050 GegD yA@( cwracgov.com Do you have any deficiencies to report for the SSUm? OYes Oi No O Unknown SSUIDSection Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(SSM):003 Management Practice Type" Handler r Preparer Type' Management Practice Detail' land Appfication Off-Site Thhd-Party Hondleror Preparer Distribution and Marketing-Compost Please Nate:Land Application includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give away)of©ass AEQ. Balk or Bag/Container PathogenQ ss- Volume Amount(drymetric tons)• Bilk C1assAE(U la/giveaway) 12967 Pollutant Concentrations: Did the facility land apply bulksewage sludge when one ormore pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentration in]able 3 of40 CFR503.139 O Yes 0 No O Unknown Name ofOff-Site ni d-Party Handler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information fortbe OffSA,Tttad Not Handler r Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique Idenllfier.1me may optionally lookup aNPDESD to auto-populate this information.Iffields remain blank after clicking the lack Up buttogthen no data exists and you must enterihe information Off-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer Information NPDFSD(ifknown) Page 11 of 29 Facility/Company Name" Synagro—South Yem Oampost Manufacmrmg Facility Md.. P.O.Be.265 City" &ate" Zip Code" Tafl "mu 93268 Off-Site MGd-Party Bandler ur Preparer Contact Information First Name• lest Name Title' Mad Buechel ArealNanager Phone H0digits,No dashes)' Est. &Mad Address' 6617652200 223 1 1 cbuechel 3VbTAGBO.com Bosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to t entify the pathogen reduction options used by your facility far this sewage sludge uuque identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply). Cade Pathogen Reduction Option Class A(must also demonstrate that meet fecal col8arm or salmonella limits) ❑ Al Class A-Altemative l:Time/Temperature A2 Class A-Alternative 2:pHlTemperamrelPemeut Solids A3 ClasshNrematim,3:Test Buterlc Yvoses and Aahnmth ova;Operating Parameters M Class A-Altemative 4:Test Enteric Yausesand Helmmth ova;NO New Solids ® AS Class A-Altemative S PFRP 1:(ampostmg ❑ A52 Class A-Altemative S PFRP 2:Heat Drying A53 (lass A-Altemative S PFRP 3:Liquid Heat Treatment A54 Class A-Alternative 5 PFL84:lharmoph&Aerobic Digestion(ATAI)) A55 Mass A-Alternative S PFPRS:Beta Fay Irradiation A56 Class A-Altemative S PFPR6:Lemma Ray Irradiation A50 Mass A-Altemative S PFRP]:Pasteum,ation A6 Class A-Altemative 6:PFRP Equivalency ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Page 12 of 29 eiosolids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by put facility or anotberpersoNfacdityforthis sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or mom that apply) Vector Attracting Reduction Options ® VRI Option l-Wfatde Solids Reduction VU Option 2-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Anaembic Bench Test) ❑ W Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aerobic Beach Test with Percent Solids ofTwo Percent or Iess) VR4 Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake Role ® VF5 Option 5-Aerabic Processing Obennopbilic Aerobic Digestion/Composting) VR6 Option 6-alkaline Treatment W Option 7-Drywg(Fgnot to or Greater than 75 Percent) mut Option 8-Drying flu gal to or Greater than 90 Percent) Nonaomr liance Ran acting Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPAs Federal sewage sludge program requirements(see 40 M5031 for this facility during the reporting period.hPAuotes that anyperson who prepares sewage sludge(i.e,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a material&gm sewage sludge)sha0 ensure that the applicable requirements m EPAs biosolids regulations(40 M5031 annual when the sewage sludge is applied to the land,placad on a surface disposal site,or fired in a sewage sludge incinerator(sea 40 M503.71. Land Application Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or said or gave away sewage sludge in a bag or other container when one armors pollutant concentrations io the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceiling pollutant Iim6(sea Table 1 gf40 CPR503.131. Facility failed to properly collect and aaalyee its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequency and approved analytical methods in order to obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding times)(see permit requirements and 40(PR503 8). Facility had deficiencies with facing.reduction(see 40�j). Facility bad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 CFR503.331. Unit application ofbulk sewage sludge Idkety to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 oftbe Brdangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat(see 40 CFR503.14fa31 Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agriculural land,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation site that was flooded,branch,or snow-covered such that the bulk sewage sludge entered a wetland orotherwatem of the United States,as defined in 40 M 1222,except as provided in a permit issued pursuant o Section 402 or 404 oflhe MA(see 40 M503.14(b)). 9dk sewage sludge was app bed to agricultural land,forest,or a reclamation site was 10 meters or less Soon waters ofthe United Rates,as defined io 40 CFR 122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(see 40 CFR503 14(cll. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact sHe,ora reclamation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate foribe bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofa reclamation site,otherwise specified by the petmitung authority(see 40 t}R503 I-W. ❑ One or mom label or in formation sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given away for land appRation(see 40 QIR503.14(eu. ❑ park sewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 003 130,H2l have been reached. ❑ The required notice and inPormation was not provided to the land application appfier(see 40 CFIt503.12M and in Page 13 of 29 ❑ qhe required notice and hbarmation was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40 CPR503.12fr1 ❑ qhe required notice was not provided to the permitting authority for the State in wbhh bulk sewage sludge was applied ifthe bulk sewage sludge was applied to land in a State other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 400+0.503126)and(i . qbe facility failed to keep the necessary records for preparers and applum during the reporting period(see 40 CPR 5032]l. SSUDSection Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(SSUD):004 Management Practice Type• Handler or Prepmer Type* Management Practice Mod* Land Application Off-Site Th6d-Party Handler or Preparer Distribution and Mmketing-Compost Please Note:land Application includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give away)ofOass AEQ. Bulk or Bag/Container* Pathogen Gass* Whose Amount(drymetric tons)* Balk Gass A]O(sale/giveaway) 8593 Pollutant Concentrations: Dd the facility land apply bulanewage sludge when one ormore pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentmth t in]hbk 3 of40 CPR503.139 O Yes Q No Q Unknown Name of Off-Site 9bird-Party Handleror Preparerforthis Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information forth,OR-Site Thhd-Party Handler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier.You may optionally lookup aNPDPSDto auto-populate this inbarmatimu lffields remain blank after clicking the look Up button,then no data exists end you must enter the information Oft-Site Third-Party Handler or Prepafer Information NPD6D(if mown) Facility/Comparry Name Synagro—mbarta Soil, Md.. 5615 S 91st Avenue City. State* Zip Code Tolleson Mims, 85353 Ott-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer Contact information Not Name• last Name^ 718le aaig Ccyer Senior OperationsN rurger Phoncti)digits,Nadaahes)• Ed. 13Mad Address- 6239366328 CC wr@SYNACdtO.com Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the pathogen reduction options used by your facday bar this sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or mom that apply). Page 14 of 29 Code Pathogen Reduction Option Gass Almost also demonstrate that meet fecal coliform or salmonella limits) ❑ Al Oaas A-Altemative l:i e/Tempermum ❑ A2 Class A-Alternative 2:pH/Tempemure/Percent Sobds ❑ A3 Class A-Alternative 3:Tes[Fr[enc Viruses and Hehninth ova;Operating Pmameters ❑ A4 OasshAhsmativa,tTest Enteric Viruses and lialmmth ova;No New Solids ® MI Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 1:Composting ❑ A52 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 2:Heat Drying ❑ A53 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 3:liquid Heal Treatment ❑ A54 Gass hAltemative S PFRP 4:ghermophitio sombre Digestion(ATM) ❑ A55 Class A-Alternative S PFPRS:Beta Ray Irradiation ❑ Am Gass A-Ahem Live S PFPR6:Comma Ray Irradiation ❑ A50 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 7:Pastemonstlon ❑ A6 Gass A-Altemative 6:PFRP Fquivalenr, ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Diosolids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by your facJky or another person/facility for this sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply) Vector Attraction Reduction Options ® VRI Option l-Volatile Solids Reduction ❑ VR2 Option 2-Bench-Scale Volaff,Solids Raductiov(Anaembic Beach Test) ❑ Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aerobk Beach Teat with Percent Solids ofTyo Vm Percents less) ❑ VR4 Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake Fate ® VRS Option 5-Aerobic Processing MermophJic Acom is Digestion/Composting) ❑ VR6 Option 6-Aialine Treatment ❑ VR] Option]-DryingA mal to or Greater than lS Percent) ❑ MM Option 8-Drying(Equalto or Greater than 90 Percent) Noncom,lia,ce Re„rti,n Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPA's Federal sewage sludge program requirements(see 40 CFR503)for this facility during the reporting pored.FPAnotes that any person who prepares sewage sludge(i.e.,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a maternal from sewage sludge)shall ensure that the applicable requirements in FPA's bwsobds regulations(40 01R503)an met when the sewage sludge a applied to the and,placed on a surface disposal site,or feed ui a sewage sludge mciaerator(see 40Q 5037). Page 15 of 29 land Application ❑ Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or sold or gave away sewage sludge or a bag or other container when one ormom pollutant concentrations m the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceiling pollutant limit(see Table 1 of40(111503.131. Facility fated to properly collect and analyse its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequencyand approved analytical methods m orderto obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding tines)(see permit requirements and 40(FR5018). Facility had deficiencies with pathogen reduction(see 40�j). Facilityhad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 CFR503331. Iaud application off,ulk sewage sludge Rely to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 ofthe Endangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat(see dl CFRSo3_l4gft.. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation site that was flooded,frozen,or snrw.crvcwd such that the bulk sewage sludge entered a wetland or ther waters of the Up tied States,as defined in 40 M 1122 except as provided in a permit issued pumuant to Section 402 or 404 ofthe C A(see 40 CIT.50314(bl). Bulk sewage sludge was app lied to agricultural land,forest,or a reclamation site was 10 meters or less from waters ofthe United States,as defined h 40 Q 122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(sec 40 CFR503 14(c)l. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact site,or reclemation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate for the bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofa reclamation site,otherwise specified by the petmiumg authority(see 40 Q0jjQ3 14(dll. ❑ One or more label or in formation sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given away for land application(see 40 CFR50314(e)), ❑ Bdksewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 003 13(b)(2l have been reached. ❑ The required notice and information was not provided to the land application appfier(see 40 CFR503.12(tl and in The required notice and information was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40 CFR So3 12th1). The required notice was not provided to the permitting authority for the State in which bulk sewage sludge was applied ifthe bulk sewage sludge was applied to hand in a Slate other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40=50312(i)and lilt. The faNity faded to keep the necessary records for preparers and apphers during the reporting period(see 4o<t�27). SSUIDSection Sewage Sludge Onique Identifier(SSU D):005 Management Practice Type* Huddler or Preparer Type* Management Practice Mind* Iand Application Off-SkeThird-Party Handleror Preparer Disitibutionand Marketing-Compost Please Note:Incid Appheatien includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give awn di fChes AEQ. Bulkor�g/Container• Pathogen Class* Whom,Amount(drymetric tons)• ®Ik (]ass AEQ(sale/giveaway) 50 Pollutant Concentrations: Did the facility land apply buR sewage sludge when one or more pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentration m Table 3 of40(FR503 13? OYea O No O Unlarm. Name ofOff-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information for the Od--Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique klentifier.Ydu may optionally lookup a"DES 0 to auto-populate this indentation.Iffields remain blank after chilling the Look Up button,then no data exists and you must enter the mPo®ation Off-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer Information Page 16 of 29 NPD®D(ifkvowv) Facility/Company Name hland Baphe Regional Composting Authoody Md.. 12645 61h Sheet Uy* &ate* Zip Code" gaucho C4camonga "rnu 91739 Off-Site Thhd-Party Handler or Preparer Contact lnformahan First Name Last Name' Title' Jeff Tugenbeia F achy Manager Phone(10-digits,Nodashes)' FXt. &Mad Address' 9099931981 jziegenbein@ieua.arg Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the pathogen reduction options used by your facility for this sewage sludge unique identifier for me reporting period(check one or more that apply). Cade Pathogen Reduction Option Class A(must also demonstrate that meet fecal coliform or salmonella limits) Al /ass A-Alternative l:Time/Temperature A2 Class AAltemative2:PHTemperature/Percent Sobds A3 (ass A-Ahemative3:Test Fterc Yunses and l3elminth ova;Operating Parameters A4 (ass A-Altemative 4:Test Babette Viruses and Hehninth ova;NO New Solids ® A51 Gass A-Alternative S PFRP L Composting A52 (ass A-Altemative S PFRP 2:Heat Drying A53 Class A-Alternative S PFRP 3:Bquid Heat Treatment A54 (ass A-Altemative S PFRP 4:Thermophdic Aembc Digestion(ATAD) A55 (ass A-Alternative S PFPRS:Beta gay mediation A56 (ass A-Altemative S PFPR6:Crtmma Ray Irradiation A50 (ass AAlternative S PFRP]:Paetemimtion A6 Class A-Altemative 6:PFRP Equivalency ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Page 17 of 29 eiosolids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by put facility or anotberpersoNfacdityforthis sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or mom that apply) Vector Attracting Reduction Options ® VRI Option l-Wfatde Solids Reduction VU Option 2-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Anaembic Bench Test) ❑ W Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aerobic Beach Test with Percent Solids ofTwo Percent or Iess) VR4 Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake Role ® VF5 Option 5-Aerabic Processing Obennopbilic Aerobic Digestion/Composting) VR6 Option 6-alkaline Treatment W Option 7-Drywg(Fgnot to or Greater than 75 Percent) mut Option 8-Drying flu gal to or Greater than 90 Percent) Nonaomr liance Ran acting Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPAs Federal sewage sludge program requirements(see 40 M5031 for this facility during the reporting period.hPAuotes that anyperson who prepares sewage sludge(i.e,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a material&gm sewage sludge)sha0 ensure that the applicable requirements m EPAs biosolids regulations(40 M5031 annual when the sewage sludge is applied to the land,placad on a surface disposal site,or fired in a sewage sludge incinerator(sea 40 M503.71. Land Application Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or said or gave away sewage sludge in a bag or other container when one armors pollutant concentrations io the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceiling pollutant Iim6(sea Table 1 gf40 CPR503.131. Facility failed to properly collect and aaalyee its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequency and approved analytical methods in order to obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding times)(see permit requirements and 40(PR503 8). Facility had deficiencies with facing.reduction(see 40�j). Facility bad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 CFR503.331. Unit application ofbulk sewage sludge Idkety to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 oftbe Brdangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat(see 40 CFR503.14fa31 Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agriculural land,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation site that was flooded,branch,or snow-covered such that the bulk sewage sludge entered a wetland orotherwatem of the United States,as defined in 40 M 1222,except as provided in a permit issued pursuant o Section 402 or 404 oflhe MA(see 40 M503.14(b)). 9dk sewage sludge was app bed to agricultural land,forest,or a reclamation site was 10 meters or less Soon waters ofthe United Rates,as defined io 40 CFR 122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(see 40 CFR503 14(cll. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact sHe,ora reclamation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate foribe bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofa reclamation site,otherwise specified by the petmitung authority(see 40 t}R503 I-W. ❑ One or mom label or in formation sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given away for land appRation(see 40 QIR503.14(eu. ❑ park sewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 003 130,H2l have been reached. ❑ The required notice and inPormation was not provided to the land application appfier(see 40 CFIt503.12M and in Page 18 of 29 ❑ qhe required notice and ammunition was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40 CPR503.12fr1 ❑ qhe required notice was not provided to the permitting authority for the State in wbuh bulk sewage sludge was applied ifthe bulk sewage sludge was applied to land in a State other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 400IR503126)and(i . qbe facility failed to keep the necessary records for preparers and appliem during the reporting period(see 40 CPR 5032]l. SSUDSection Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(SSUD):006 Management Practice Type• Handler or Prepmer Type* Management Practice Mod* Land Application Off-Site Th6d-Party Handler or Preparer Distribution and Mmketing-Compost Please Note:land Application includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give away)of0ass AEQ. Bulk or Bag/Container* Pathogen Gass* Whose Amount(drymetric tons)* Balk Gass AEQ(mIc/giveaway) 951 Pollutant Concembut ions: Dd the facility land apply bulanewage sludge when one ormore pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentmth t to]hbk 3 of40 CPR503.139 O Yes Q No Q Unknown Name of Off-Site 9bird-Party Handleror Preparerforthis Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information forth,Off--Site Thhd-Party Handler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier.You may optionally lookup aNPDFSDto auto-populam this urkwa atimu lffields remain blank after clicking the Iaok Up button,then no data exists end you must enter the information Oft-Site Third-Party Handler or Prepafer Information NPD6D(if mown) Facility/Company Name Syaagro-NurseryProduch Md.. PO Box 1439 City. State* Zip Code Heleadale &Gfomh 92342 Ott-Site Thud-Party Handler or Preparer Contact information Firal Name• lase Name^ 718le Chad Brechel Area Mavager More t hsligits,No dashes)• Ed. 13Mad Address- 6613782515 cbuechel(a�YNACdtO.com Mosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the pathogen reduction options used by your facday for this sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or mom that apply). Page 19 of 29 Code Pathogen Reduction Option Gass Almost also demonstrate that meet fecal coliform or salmonella limits) ❑ AI Oaas A-Altemative l:i e/Tempermum ❑ A2 Class A-Alternative 2:pH/Tempemure/Percent Sobds ❑ A3 Class A-Alternative 3:Tes[Fr[enc Viruses and Hehninth ova;Operating Pmameters ❑ A4 OasshAhsmativa,tTest Enteric Viruses and lialmmth ova;No New Solids ® MI Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 1:Composting ❑ A52 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 2:Heat Drying ❑ A53 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 3:liquid Heal Treatment ❑ A54 Gass hAltemative S PFRP 4:ghermophitio sombre Digestion(ATM) ❑ A55 Class A-Alternative S PFPRS:Beta Ray Irradiation ❑ Am Gass A-Ahem Live S PFPR6:Comma Ray Irradiation ❑ A50 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 7:Pastemonstlon ❑ A6 Gass A-Altemative 6:PFRP Fquivalenr, ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Diosolids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by your facJky or another person/facility for this sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply) Vector Attraction Reduction Options ® VRI Option l-Volatile Solids Reduction ❑ VR2 Option 2-Bench-Scale Volaff,Solids Raductiov(Anaembic Beach Test) ❑ Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aerobk Beach Teat with Percent Solids ofTyo Vm Percents less) ❑ VR4 Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake Fate ® VRS Option 5-Aerobic Processing MermophJic Acom is Digestion/Composting) ❑ VR6 Option 6-Aialine Treatment ❑ VR] Option]-DryingA mal to or Greater than lS Percent) ❑ MM Option 8-Drying(Equalto or Greater than 90 Percent) Noncom,lia,ce Re„rti,n Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPA's Federal sewage sludge program requirements(see 40 CFR503)for this facility during the reporting pored.FPAnotes that any person who prepares sewage sludge(i.e.,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a maternal from sewage sludge)shall ensure that the applicable requirements in FPA's bwsobds regulations(40 01R503)an met when the sewage sludge a applied to the and,placed on a surface disposal site,or feed ui a sewage sludge mciaerator(see 40Q 5037). Page 20 of 29 land Application ❑ Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or sold or gave away sewage sludge or a bag or other container when one ormom pollutant concentrations N the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceiling pollutant limit(see Table 1 of40(111503.131. Facility fated to properly collect and analyse its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequencyand approved analytical methods m orderto obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding tines)(see permit requirements and 40(FR5018). Facility had deficiencies with pathogen reduction(see 40�j). Facilityhad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 CFR503331. Iaud application off,ulk sewage sludge Rely to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 ofthe Endangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat(see dl CFRSo3_l4gft.. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation site that was flooded,frozen,or snrw.crvcwd such that the bulk sewage sludge entered a wetland or ther waters of the Up tied States,as defined in 40 M 1122 except as provided in a permit issued pumuant to Section 402 or 404 ofthe C A(see 40 CIT.50314(bl). Bulk sewage sludge was app lied to agricultural land,forest,or a reclamation site was 10 meters or less from waters ofthe United States,as defined N 40 Q 122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(sec 40 CFR503 14(c)l. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact site,or reclemation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate for the bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofa reclamation site,otherwise specified by the petmiumg authority(see 40 Q0jjQ3 14(dll. ❑ One or more label or in formation sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given away for land application(see 40 CFR50314(e)), ❑ Bdksewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 003 13(b)(2l have been reached. ❑ The required notice and information was not provided to the land application appfier(see 40 CFR503.12(tl and in The required notice and information was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40 CFR So3 12th1). The required notice was not provided to the permitting authority for the State in which bulk sewage sludge was applied ifthe bulk sewage sludge was applied to hand in a Slate other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40=50312(i)and lilt. The faNity faded to keep the necessary records for preparers and apphers during the reporting period(see 4o<t�27). SSUIDSection Sewage Sludge Onique Identifier(SSU D):009 Management Practice Type* Huddler or Preparer Type* Management Practice Mind* Iand Application Off-SkeThird-Party Handleror Preparer Disitibutionand Marketing-Compost Please Note:Incid Appheatien includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give awn di fMis AEQ. Bulkor�g/Container• Pathogen Class* 1O1ume Amount(drymetric tons)• ®Ik (]ass AEQ(saId/giveaway) 149 Pollutant Concentrations: Did the facility land apply buR sewage sludge when one or more pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentration m Table 3 of40(FR503 13? OYea O No O Unlarm. Name ofOff-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information for the Od--Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique klentifier.Ydu may optionally lookup a"DES 0 to auto-populate this indentation.Iffields remain blank after chilling the Look Up button,then no data exists and you must enter the mPo®ation Off-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer Information Page 21 of 29 NPD®m(ifkaown) Facility/Company Name» Laberly0ampost Md.. 12421 Houoway Rd. Uy» &are• zip Code» Lastlfills califomu 193249 Off-Site Mkd-Party Handler ur Preparer Contact Information First Name Lest Name' Title' Patrick McCarty Composting/logistics Phone(10-0igits,No dashes)' Est. &Mad Address' 6617972914 patrickmccnnby@nccanhy&ms.com Mosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the pathogen reduction options used by your facday for this sewage sludge unique identifier for me reporting period(check one or more that apply). Cade Pathogen Reduction Option Class A(must also demonstrate that meet fecal colifarm or salmonella limits) Al bass A-Altematwe LDn a/Temperature A2 (lass A-Altemative2:PHTemperatum/Pemenrsobds A3 (lass A-Ahemative3:Test lateric Ynnses and Helminth ova;Operating Parameters A4 Class A-Altemative 4:Test&Verc Viruses and Hemanth ova;NO New Solids ® A51 (lass A-Altemarive S PFRP L Composting A52 (lass A-Altemative S PFRP 2:Heat Drying A53 Class AAltemative S PFRP 3:liquid Heat Treatment A54 (Bass A-Atemative S PFRP 4:Thermophdic Aembc Digestion(ATAD) A55 (lass A-Altemative S PFPRS:Beta Ray Intimation A56 (lass A-Altemative S PFPR6:Cemma Ray Irradiation A50 Class A-Altemative S PFRP]:Pastemimtion A6 (lass A-Altemarive 6:PFRP Fyuivalene, ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Page 22 of 29 eiosolids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by put facility or anotberpersoNfacdityforthis sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or mom that apply) Vector Attracting Reduction Options ® VRI Option l-Wfatde Solids Reduction VU Option 2-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Anaembic Bench Test) ❑ W Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aerobic Beach Test with Percent Solids ofTwo Percent or Iess) VR4 Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake Role ® VF5 Option 5-Aerabic Processing Obennopbilic Aerobic Digestion/Composting) VR6 Option 6-alkaline Treatment W Option 7-Drywg(Fgnot to or Greater than 75 Percent) mut Option 8-Drying flu gal to or Greater than 90 Percent) Nonaomr liance Ran acting Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPAs Federal sewage sludge program requirements(see 40 M5031 for this facility during the reporting period.hPAuotes that anyperson who prepares sewage sludge(i.e,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a material&gm sewage sludge)sha0 ensure that the applicable requirements m EPAs biosolids regulations(40 M5031 annual when the sewage sludge is applied to the land,placad on a surface disposal site,or fired in a sewage sludge incinerator(sea 40 M503.71. Land Application Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or said or gave away sewage sludge in a bag or other container when one armors pollutant concentrations io the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceiling pollutant Iim6(sea Table 1 gf40 CPR503.131. Facility failed to properly collect and aaalyee its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequency and approved analytical methods in order to obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding times)(see permit requirements and 40(PR503 8). Facility had deficiencies with facing.reduction(see 40�j). Facility bad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 CFR503.331. Unit application ofbulk sewage sludge Idkety to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 oftbe Brdangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat(see 40 CFR503.14fa31 Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agriculural land,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation site that was flooded,branch,or snow-covered such that the bulk sewage sludge entered a wetland orotherwatem of the United States,as defined in 40 M 1222,except as provided in a permit issued pursuant o Section 402 or 404 oflhe MA(see 40 M503.14(b)). 9dk sewage sludge was app bed to agricultural land,forest,or a reclamation site was 10 meters or less Soon waters ofthe United Rates,as defined io 40 CFR 122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(see 40 CFR503 14(cll. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact sHe,ora reclamation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate foribe bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofa reclamation site,otherwise specified by the petmitung authority(see 40 t}R503 I-W. ❑ One or mom label or in formation sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given away for land appRation(see 40 QIR503.14(eu. ❑ park sewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 003 130,H2l have been reached. ® The required notice and inPormation was not provided to the land application appfier(see 40 CFIt503.12M and in Page 23 of 29 ❑ 'fire required notice and hallucination was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe hand on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40 CFR503.12fh11. ❑ Me required notice was not provided to the permitting authority for the State in which bulk sewage sludge was applied ifthe bulk sewage sludge was applied to land in a State other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40 Q 503126)and(i . Me facility failed to keep the necessary records for preparers and appliers during the reporting period(see 40 CFR 50327. Please provide additional explanatory details in the comment box below(limit to 3,900 characters)or attach a POF file ifyou are reporting any noncompliance with IPA's Federal sewage sludge program requirements (we 40 CFR503)for this SSUIDdurmg the reporting period.In particulaq please note the sewage sludge tonnage related to the deficiencies identified above. See attachment submitted with form. Land Application Deficiencies PDFA tachment File:None ® meckwhen done with SS111Dsection. Rosobds Monitoring Data NSTRUMONS:These monitoring data should be representative ofthe sewage sludge that was applied to land orplaced on a surface disposal site during the reporting year see 40 CFR503 8(al.This section uses the frequency oficonkormg requirements in 40 CFR503.16 and 50326.The following codes can be used as data qualifiers:T=Too Numerous to Count,E=Fatimated,N=No Data. Maximum Pollutant Concentration Data for All Sewage Sludge Applied to land* 'This section summarizes the maximum polhrtant concentmtume in sewage sludge that was applied to land during the reporting year.In accordance with 40 C 503.13m,EPA's sewage sludge regulations prohbit land application ofbuk sewage sludge or sewage sludge sold or gave away sewage sludge in a bag or other container when one or more sewage sludge pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge e eed a land application celmg pollutant lima(see Table 1 of40 CPR503.131.N order to identify noncompliance,FPAwW compare the pollutant concentrations in this section against the ceding concentration limits in Table I of40 C R503 13. Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofMeasure OXy Weight) Sample Type Arsenic mg/kg ocodpoS January February March April May June 6.7 1= 1&7 = 11 = 17.3 = 1 7.6 = 12 July August September October November December 8.6 7.0 9.6 Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Moutrecd Parameter Measurement Type Una ofMeasure lay Weight) Sample Type Cadmium I mg/kg cDldpiOS January Rbmery March April May June 1.8 23 2.9 1.5 1.3 2.] July August September October November December = 3.4 = 2.9 = 4.0 Page 24 of 29 Hosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type tail ofW...(Dry Weight) Sample Type Capper mg/kg ODMPOS January February March April May lure 450 520 490 I= 480 410 = 480 July Auguat September October November Neeember 540 410 1540 = 520 460 = 420 Wsolids or Sewage Sludge hbnitoted Parameter h/easurement Type Unit ofMeasure(Ay Weight) Sample Type Isad Maxmum mg/kg Cows January February March April May June 11 < 23 = L2 = 14 1 12 25 July August September Weber November December, < 12 13 = 12 = 12 = 1] 12 Rosobds or Sewage Sludge Mannered Parameter h/emamment Type Unit ofbieaaure(Dry Weight) Sample Type b/ercury Maximum mg/kg ODMPOS Jannary Romery hlaroh April May June 0.70 1.0 0.61 L 0.65 1.9 LS July Augur September October November December 0.88 us 1 0.96 0.95 0.95 1.3 MosoMe or Sewage Sludge bnkored Parameter hleaamement Type Unit ofbleamm(Dry Weight) Sample Type Molybdenum h/aximum mg/kg ODMPOS former, February blurb April blay June 14 13 13 15 13 16 July August September October November December = 12 25 1] I6 14 9osolids or Sewage Sudge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofMaaame(Dry Weight) Sample Type Ncke1 mg/kg Mb s lanuary February March April May June 55 1= 31 = 36 i= 36 = 34 = 46 Job, August September Oewbar November December 43 1= 25 1= 37 = 33 = 29 = 2] Page 25 of 29 Hosolida or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Dail ofW...(Dry Weight) Sample Type Nitrogen I mg/kg MblpOS January February March April May June 53000 590M 61000 I= 49000 45000 = 56000 July Angpat September October November December 54000 550M 58000 = 51000 50000 = 55000 Mosolids or Sewage Sludge blanketed Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofhfeasure(Dry Weight) Sample Type Selenium Maximum mg/kg COWOS January February March April May June 10 = 14 = 9.7 = 11 = 5.1 = 12 July August September October November December 82 = 12 = 12 = 99 = 11 = 69 Rosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter h1easurement Type Unit ofhfeasure(Dr,Weight) Sample Type Zane I mg/kg ODh1PO5 January Febmary hfamh April May June 620 570 620 1 640 550 WO July August September October November December 710 560 1 750 ]10 630 610 Monthly Average Pollutant Concentration Data for All Sewage Sludge Applied to fund nis section summarizes the monitoring-period average pollutant concentrations in sewage sludge that was applied tp land during the meaning year. Biosohds or Sewage Sludge Wagered Parameter h1easamment Type Dad ofbfeamra(Dry Weight) Sample Type Arsenic I mg/kg Mbms January Febmary March April May June 63 6A 83 = 17o 1 6.7 = 12 July August September October November December 8.0 6.7 7.6 Mosohds or Sewage Sludge lAmdored Parameter hMasurement Type Unit ofhfeasure(Dry Wright) Sample Type Cadmium I mg/kg WWOS Janomy February March April May Mae = 1.6 < 23 = 2.4 = 1.3 = 1 13 = 29 July August September October November December, = 3.1 = 16 = 3.6 Page 26 of 29 Hosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type tail ofW...(Dry Weight) Sample Type Capper Average mg/kg ODMPOS January February March April May lure 390 440 450 I= 480 410 = 450 July August September October November Naeember 490 400 520 = 490 440 = 420 Wsolids or Sewage Sludge hbnitoted Parameter h/easurement Type Unit ofbleasure(Dry Weight) Sample Type Isad Average mg/kg CDMPDS January February March April May June < 11 < 23 < 11 = 14 1 12 25 July August September October November December, < 12 13 < 13 = 11 = 14 12 Roso8ds or Sewage Sludge Mannered Parameter h4eaamement]ype Unit ofblename(Dr,Weight) Sample]ype b/ercury Avenge mg/kg ODMPOS January Romery hlaroh April May June 0.62 0.87 0.60 1 0.64 1.7 1.3 July Augur September October November December 0.82 U3 1 0.94 6osoWs or Sewage Sludge bnkored Parameter h/eaamemenYfype Unit ofMeamm(Dry Weight) Sample'fype Nckel Avenge mg/kg ODMPOS January February blurb April blay June — 29 31 36 34 43 July Augur[ September October November December 39 25 37 30 2] 2] 9osolids or Sewage Sudge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Unit offikaame(Dry Weight) Sample Type Selenium Average mg/kg M69POS lanuary February March April May June 9.7 1= 9.8 = 9.1 = 10 = 4.A Job, August September October November December 8.0 1= 93 1= I 9.8 Page 27 of 29 Hosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type WLL ofMeasure(I)ry Weight) Sample Type tine Average mg/kg ODMPOS January Pebmary Minch April May June 540 Soo 560 = 640 540 = 630 July Ani'st September October November December 670 550 700 = 690 600 = 610 Pathogens:©ass A,Fecal Wiform* Mosolids or Sewage Sludge MrnHored Parameter Measurement Type than ofMeasure(Dry Weight) Samp le Type Fecal Gohforra Geometric Meev MPN/graa 1 GRAB] January February March April May June N I July August September October November December N Pathogens:Class A,Sahrranella* Waolids or Sewage Sludge Mmi[ored Parameter Measurement Type Dart ofMeasure(ay Weight) Sample Type Sahnonella Geometric Meav r per,tgmms Gd 7 January February March April May June N I July August September October November December N Vectot Attraction Reduction-Volatile Solids Options(Options 1-3)* Hosolids or Sewage Sludge Mentioned Parameter Measurement Type IJart ofWasure(Dr,Weight) Sample Type Solids,totol volaWe pereeut removal Percent January February March April May June 62 1= 63 = 61 = 59 = 58 = 54 July August September October November December 60 1= 61 = 62 = 62 = 62 = 60 Alditwnallnfarmatwn Page 28 of 29 Please enter any additional information in the comment box below(Twit to 3,900 characters)that your would like to provide. -Repotted"organic remgen m"Inhogen"fields above. -Attached is OrSD's IAosullds Management Cumpli ince Report including the Priority Pollutants report in Appendix C -(XSDdoes not monitorbasolids frindicawrorganism,ceramic we produce On,,Rvlatlme and temperature in anterobicdigestersIN chosen for fecal cotifsim and sahnomella). -Reported value for\ .an average calculation using two flow weightedsample resu Its and average month ly flows. -PerOOSD's toed to FPAom2/2/19,forconshencywith O DB historical reporting pmctices,OOSD has reported our biosolide data to the reporting fruit(RIfXSD will follow-up with FPAto address this matterfor 2017 reporting. Additional Attachment. File:2016_O(SD_Moral_Bioserlids__Compliance_Report_503.pdf QHMcatiour Information Qrtifier&h1aff rcoss(aycsd.com ®Qnfvm QrtiSer rem aithead.com' Page 29 of 29 plat Sewage Sludge (Biosolids)Ann03.48port FPARegulations-503.18,503.28,503.48 INSgRUCDONS PRA'ssewage sludge regulations(4013'R ap rt 5031 requite certain POWs and Class l sewage sludge management facilities to submit to an annual biosolids report.POTYs that must submit an annual report include POT s with a design Row rate equal to or greater than one million gallons per day,and POIWs that serve 10,000 people or more.]his is the bwsolids annual report form for PO'IWs and(]ass Isewage sludge management facilities in the 42 states and afihiltes and centuries where FPAadmwuters the Fedemlbiosolids pmgmm. For the purposes ofthis form,the term'sewage sludge also refrs to the material that is commonly reerred to as biosolids.'FPAdoes not have a regulatory definition for biosolids but this material is commonly truncated to as wage sludge that is placed on,or applied to the had to use the beneficial properties ofthe material as a said amendment,conditioner,or fierti ieer.PPA%use ofthe term biosoMs'in this fo®is to confirm that information about beneficiallyused sewage sludge(aka.bmsofids)shouW be reported on this form. Please note that questions with a(4)are required.Please also note that ERAmay contact you after you submit this report for more information regarding your sewage sludge program. Questions regarding this form should be directed to the NPDFS Electronic Reporting Uelpdeskac •NPDFSeRepommgQpa.gov OR •1-877-2274965 What action would you hike to take?' New 9osalids Pmgmm Report I.Program Infnrmatiun Please select the NPDFS m number below for this Sewage Sludge(9osolids)Annual Report.' C 120604:Omnge County SD 42 Ifyou do not see the NPDFSD associated with your facility,please Cancel and within the Forms tab submit aNPDFS0 Access Request.Complete instructions are available in the 13osofids Users Guide at httosl/ e metaendeskcom/hc/en-us/sectlona/207108787- neml-osofids Facility Name:Orange County SD#2 Street: 10844 Ellis Avenue City:FOUNTAIN VA= State:CA Zip Code:92708-7018 1.1 Please selectee kartone ofthe following optionspenaining to yourobhgation to submit a Sewage Sludge d3iosohds)Annual Report in comphaace with 40S 503.11ie facilityis:' Za POT9with a design Flow rate equal to or greater than one million gallons per day Z a P07[4that serves 10,000 people or more Z a Class I Mudge Management Fetidness defined in 40 M5039 otherwise required to report(e.g.,permit condiliogenforeement action) ❑ none ofthe above Page 1 of 25 1.2 Reporting Period Start and ad Dates Start Date ofReporting Period• ad Date ofReportmg Period• 01-01-2016 12-31-2016 2.Facilitymfrmation 2.19osofids or Sewage Sludge Treatment Processes Please check the box net to the following biosofids or sewage sludge treatment processes that you used on the sewage sludge or bioaoPda generated or produced at your facility during the reporting period(check one or more that apply).* Pathogen Reduction Operations(see App andix Bto Part 503) Physical Treatment Operations Processes to Significantly Reduce Pathogens(PSRPI ® Preliminary Operations(e.g.,sludge grhrd'mg,degrittmg,blending) Aembie Digestion ® 9hickenmg(e.g,gravity and/or flotation thickening,centrifugation,belt fikerpress,vacuum filter) Air Lkymg(or`sludge drying beds') ❑ Sludge Lagoon ® Anaerobic Oigestion Other Processes to Manage Sewage Sludge ❑ Lower Temperature Composting ❑ Temporary Sludge Storage(sewage sludge stored on land 2 years or less,not m sewage sludge unit) ❑ Lime Stab Rication ❑ Long-term Sludge Storage(sewage sludge stored on land 2 years or more,not in sewage sludge unit) Processes to Further Reduce Patbonena(PPRP) ® Methane orRagas Capture and Recovery Lfigher Temperature Composting ❑ Other Treatment Process: Lbat Drying(e.g,flash dryer,sproydryegromry dryer) LLeat Treatment(Liquid sewage sludge is heated to temp.of356T(or I80`Qorhgher for 30 min.) Thermophik,Aerobic Digestion ❑ Bata Ray Irradiation ❑ Gamma Rayhradiation ❑ Pasteurization 2.2 Ek sofids or Sewage Sludge Analytical Methods EPA mgulatons specify that representative samples ofsewage sludge that is applied to the land,placed on a suffice disposal site,or fired in a sewage sludge numerator must be collected and analyzed,these regulations also specify the analytical methods that must be used to analyze samples ofsewage sludge.For example,EPArequhes facilities to monitor for the certain parameters,which are listed in Tables 1,2,3,and d at 40 CPR503.13 and nbles 1 and 240 QT1503 23.See also 40 CFR503.8. Please check the box net to the following analytic methods used on the sewage sludge or bioaolids generated or produced byyou or put facility during the reporting period(check one or more that apply) Parameter Method Number or Author Descrip tion Text for Certification Section Pathogens Sludge Monitoring-Ascaris ova. Sludge Monitoring-Awaris ova,"Method for the Recovery and Assay ofTotal CultumbleWuses mom Sludge(Appendix lk- lsscaria ova. ControlofPathogens and Vector Attmetion m Sewage Sludge',EPA-625-R-92-013,July 2003 Other Awaris ova.Analytical Method: Page 2 of 25 Parameter Method Number or Author Descrip tion Text for C rtiHcation Section ASTM Method D4994-Enteric Causes AS1MMethod D4994-Emetic Manses,"Standard Practice fr Recovery ofMruses From Wastewater Sludges,"ASTM International Enteric comes Other Enteric Causes Analylical Method: � Standard Method 9222-Fecal Colform Standard Method 9222-Fecal Caliimar,'5tandard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater;'American Public Healtb Association[Note:This method is only allowable fin Class Bsewage sludge] Standard Method 9221-Fecal Orlin. Standard Method 9221-Fecal Colifonn,'5tandard Methods bar the Examination of Water and Wastewater,"American Public Health Association Fecalcobfcar F1EPAMelbod 1680-Fecal Colform EPAMethod 1680-Fecal CoBfonq'Pecal CoBformsw Sewage Sludge by[vuniple-Tuba Fermentation using leury[4yptose Foods � EPAMethod 1681-Fecal Colman and EC3Aedmm,"EPA-821-] 10-003,Apd2010 EPAMethod 1681-Fecal Colformr Fecal Colfonms in Sewage Sludge(Biosolds)by MuhipleTube Fermentation using hl Other Fecal Colifnn Analytical Method: medium,FPM21-Ib04-027,1uae 2005 WA Ymko Method-Hehmmth ova. WA Yanko Method-Elesmith Ova,"Occurrence of Pathogens in Distribution and Marketing MunicipalSludges," 1Jelnumb ova. HE'"00-1-87-014,1987 Other Helminth ova.Analytical Method: Standard Method 9260-Sahonella Standard Method 9260-Salmonella,'Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,"American Public Health Association EPAMethod 1692-Saluone8a EPAMethod 1682,"Salmonella in Sewage Sludge(Rowboat by Modeled Semisold Rappaport-Cassiliadis(MSRV)Medium," Sahnouella sP �cterla EPA.821-E-06-014,July 2006 ❑ Renner and Clark Metbod-SSMonella Fenner and dark Method-Sslmonella,`DeteCtinn and Enumeration ofSahnonella and Pseudommus aemginosa:1.Water ❑ Other Salmonella sp.Bacteria Analytical Method: Pollution Control Federation,46(9C 163-2171,1974 Class ASludge Monitoring-Total Odmrable Manses HPA Class A Sludge Monitoring-Total Columb le Manses,"Method bar the Recovery and Assay oflotal Cultumble Causes Som Total Culturable Manses Sludge(Appendix H),"Control ofPathogens and M:etor Attraction in Sewage Sludge,ll`"25-Ib92-013,July 2003 Other Total Clrhurable Manses Analytical Method: Metals ® EPAMethod 6010-Arsenic OU-06) EPA Method 6010-Arsemc(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission SpeUrometqk'Test Methods far Evafatmg Solid Waste,Phys"Vdnemical Methods,"EPAPnb.SW-846 � EPAMethod 6020- irmork("-MS) EPA Method 6020-Arsenic inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ Chemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 Arsenic � EPAMethod T010-Arsenic(tTh-AAS) EPA Method 9010-Arsenic(Cvaphits Mmace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry),'Test Methods for EAaluating Solid Waste, EPAMethod 9061-Ansenic(AA- pl PhysicaVClumical Methods('EPA Pub.SW-846 EPA Method'l061-Arsenic(Atomic Absorption-Gaseous Hydrate),'Test Methods An Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaVQemical Other Arsenic Anayical Method Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ® EPAMethod 6010-Berllium 0CP-0ES) EPA Method 6010-Beryllium(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),'Test Methods fr EYaluating Solid Waste,PhysisaVChem ical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 F] EPAWflimf 6020-Bery41Um(ICP-MS) EPA Method 6020-Beryllium(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrametrya'Teat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, PhysicaVUemical Methods,"EPA Pub.5 W-846 BeryPium � IPAMethod T000-Beryllium(FAAS) EPA Method 9000-Beryllium Maine komic Absorption SpecumphotometUT'Test Methods bar Evaluating Sold Waste,Physical/ EPAMethod T010-Beryllium acroical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 (Qr-Aqq) EPA Method 7010-Baryfum(Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectmphotometry),'Test Methods fin Evaluating Solid Other Wryllurm Analytical Method Waste,PhyscaVOremical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 Page 3 of 25 Parameter Method Number or Author Ecscrip Non Text for Csrti6cation Section ® IPAMetbod 6010-Cadmium(1CP-OW EPA Method 6010-Cadmvrm(lvductsely Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),"hst Methods fir E duatwg Solid Waste,Physical/Oaemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ❑ EPAMetbod 6020-Cadmium 0e-W EPAMethod 6020-Cadmlum(fndurthrcbbupled Plasma-Mess Spectromctry),'Ted Methods for Evaluating S Iid Waste, EPAMethod 7000-Cadmium(FAAS) PhysieaVChcmiwl Methods,"EPAPub.W-846 Cadmium ❑ EPAMethod 9000-Cadmlum(Wame Atomic Absorption$pectrophotometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaV ❑ EPAMMWod 7010-Cedmium(OF-AAS) Otemical Msthoda,"EPAPub.SW-846 EPAMethod 7010-Cadmium(Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry),^test Methods for Evaluating Sobd ❑ EPAMethod 7131-Cadmium(GF-AAS) Waste,PhysieaVOremieal Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ❑ abet Cadmium Analytical Method: IPAMethod 7131-Cadmium(Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometryh'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaVastrical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ® EPAMetbod 6010-Chromatin f"-OES) EPAMethod 6010-ammium dnduetively Coopled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),'Test Methods mr Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaVOrcm nal Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ❑ EPAMMWod6020-mrommm(ICP-MS) IPAMethod 6020-a romium deductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'TbdMethods for Evaluating Sohd Waste, PhysiwVOumical Methods,"IPAPub.W-846 ❑ FPAMethod]000-(Lromvm(FAA$) EPAMethod]Oo0-ammium(Planes Atoms Absorption Spectrophotomstryh"hst Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Otromium ❑ EPAMethod 7010-Chmmmm(Cf-AAS) PhyaicaVOremsal Methods;'EPAPub.SW-846 MA Method 7010-Oiromium(Graphite pomace Atomic Absorption Spectrophoom elry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid ❑ IPAMelhod 7191-(bmmium Waste,Ph,k.VOrcmical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 (A Ff) IPAMethod 9191-ammium(Atomic absorption-FurnaceTechnique),'Teat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ Otherllromwn Analytical Method: Otemical Methodic,"EPAPub.SW-846 ® EPAMetbod 6010-Capper(1CP-OES) FPAMethod 6010-Copper(hrduclively Coupled Plasma-Optical Finission 5pernmactry),7esl Methods forlbaluatmg Solid Waste,PhysicaVaemical Methodic,"FPAPub.SW-846 EPAMethod 6020-tbpper(ICP-MS) IPAMethod 6020-Capper(Inductively Coupled Palma-Mass Specmcmetry),'Teat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ Oremical M athoda,"EPAPub.SW446 Capper ❑ EPAMeNod 7000-Copper(FAA$) IPA Method]000-Capper(Home Atomic Absorption Spectrophotumetry),'Teat Methods for Evaluating Sohd Waste,Physical/ ❑ EPAMethod]010-Copper(GF- Chemical Methods,"EPANI,.SW346 AAS) EPAMethod]010-Capper d5raphde Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectropbotometryb'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, ❑ Other Capper Analytical Method: Physical/a,ra al Methods;'EPAPub.SW--846 ® IPAMethod 6010-lead(IP-OES) EPA Method 6010-Icadanduetively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),^feat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, PhyeicaVOmmical Methodic;'EPA Pub.SW-846 ❑ EPAMcthod 6020-lend 0CP-MS) FPA Method 6020-I ad(Nductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry)'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical, EPAMethod 7000-Lead(FAAS) Chemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 fead ❑ EPA Method 7000-Icad(Home Atomic Absorption SpectrophotomertI'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ IPAMetbod 9010-land(C£-AAS) Chemical Methods,"FPAPub.SW-846 IPA Method 7010-lead(Gmphde Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectropbotometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Sohd Waste, ❑ EPA Method 7421-Iead(AA-Fl) Physlc.Facmiral Matbods;'IPA Pub.W-846 EPA Method]421-lead(Atomic Absorption-Furnace Techniquet'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,MysicaVUemical ❑ OIM1erlead Analytical Method: Methods,'EPAPub.SW446 ® EPA Metb.d 7471-Memory(CVAA) EPA Method 7471-Mercury in Solid or Semi-Solid Waste(Cohl Vapor Atomic Absoprtion),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Mere. Waste,Physicailacenical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ❑ OIM1er MercuryAnalNical Method: Page 4 of 25 Parameter Method Number or Author Description Text for Certification Section ® EPAMetbod 6010-Molybdenum(IB-06) EPA Method 6010-Molybdenum(fnductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Prussian Spectrometry),'Test Methods bar aahadng Solid Waste,Physicallaemical Methodsf FPAPub.SW-846 ❑ EPAMetbod 6020-Moybdenum(17P-MS) EPAMethod 6020-Molybdenum(Inductivelyaupled Plasma-Mass Spectromenj7est Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, ❑ EPAMetbod 7000-Molybdenum(FAAS) PhysicaVaemical Methods"EPAPub.SW--846 EPAMethad 7000-Molybdenum(Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometryx'Test Methods fr Eauating Solid Waste, Molybdenum ❑ ppAM,dmd]010-Molybdenum(GF-AAS) Physic.DCbcmical Methods"FPAPub.W-846 EPAMethod 7010-Molybdenum(G sphhe Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry),'Tesl Methods for Evaluating Solid ❑ EPAMethod 7481-Molybdenum Waste,PhysicaVChemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 (M-FT) FPAMelhod]481-Molybdenum(Atomic Absorption-Fumace Technique),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaV ❑ Other Molybdenum Analytical Method: Chemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW4146 ® EPAMMM1od 6010-NirIacW-OES) EPAMethod 6010-Nickel(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),'rest Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaVaem ical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ❑ FPAMethod 6020-Mhckel(ICP-MS) EPAMmhod 6020-Nickel(Induclively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Test Mletbods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaV Nickel EPAMet cal 7000-Mhckel(FAAS) aemical Mothoda,"EPAPub.SW4146 ❑ EPAMethod 7Oo0-Nickel(Flame Atom's Absorption Spectrophotometry),'Test Methods fin Evaluating Solid Waste,PhyssaV ❑ EPAMetbod 7010-Nic1m1(GF- aemical Methods,"FPAPub.SW446 AAS) EPAMethod 7010-Nickel((haphite Pomace Atomic Absorption Spectropbotomary),'Test Methods for&aluating Solid Waste, ❑ Other Nickel Analytical Method: Mysical/aemical Methods('EPAPub.SW--846 ® EPAMetbod 6010-Selenium(ICP-0ES) EPAMethod 6010-Selemium(Inductnailyauped Plasma-Optical Enission Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhydcaVaemical Methods,"EPAPob.SW-846 ❑ EPAMethod 6020-Selenium9P-MS) EPA Method 6020-&dermin flnbseively aupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Test Methods fer Analuatlug Solid Waste, PhysicaVaernical Methods"EPA Pub.SW-846 ❑ EPAMothod]010-Selenium(GF-AAS) MA Method 7010-Selenium(GrapMte Furnace Atomic Absorption SpectmphmometryZ lest Methods for Evaluating Solid Selenium ❑ EPAMethod]]40-Rdenhm(A Ff) Waste,Physieallandical Methods;EPAPob.SW-846 EPA Method]]4IA-Selenium(Atomic Absorption-Furnace Techniquex'Test Methods bar fvaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ EPAMeWod]]41-Rdenum Chemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 (AMGfq EPA Method]]41-Selenium(Atomic Absorption-Gaseous Hydrue),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Myseavaemical ❑ Other Selenium Analytical Method: Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 ® EPAMetbod 6010-Lac(1B4]FS) EPAMethod 6010-Zinc(fductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Enission Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, PhysicaVaemical Methods"EPAPub.SW-846 ❑ EPAMetbod 6020-Zmc(ICP-W) EPAMethod 6020-Zise(InductivelyCoupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry), est Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ Chemical Methods,"FPAPub.SW446 live ❑ FPAMethod]000-Zfe(FAAS) EPA Method]000-Zinc(Flame Aomic Absorption SpeclmphotometryZ 7est Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ EPAMetbod 7010-Zhc(GF-AAS) Chemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 EPA Method 7010-Zmc(Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption SpectrophotometryZ'Test Methods far Evaluating Solid Waste, ❑ Other2mr Analytical Method: Physical/aemical Methods,"EPA Pub.SW--846 Nitrogen ampounds ❑ EPAMethod 350.1-Ammonia Ndrogen EPAMethod 350A-AmmonaNtrogen,"Determmatfn ofeunmonia Nitrogen by&md-,A tomated aorimetry,"Angust 1993 Ammonu Nitrogen ® Standard Method 4500-NH3-Ammonia Nitrogen Standard Method 4500-NEB-Ammonia Nitrogen,"Standard Methods fin the Examination of Water and Wastewater"American Pub he Feakh Association ❑ Other Ammonia Nitrogen Analytical Method Page 5 of 25 Parameter Method Number or Author Descrip tion Text for 4rti6catiov Section � EPAMethod 9056-Nitrate Nitrogen(IC) EPAMethod 9056-Nitrate Nitrogen(en Ormmatogmphy),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical,asmical Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 � EPAMetb.d 9210-Nitrate Nbmgen OSE) EPAMethod 9210-Nitrate Nitrogen Orn-Selective Hectrode),Test Methods for Festooning Solid Waste,PhyncaVQremical Methods,"EPAPub.SWb46 ® OIM1er Nitate Nitrogen Analytical Method: PA 300.0 Nitrate Nitrogen Standard Method 4500-N-Nitrogev Standard F Method 4500-N-Nitrogen,"Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater;'American Public Health Nkmgen Association (titer Nitrogen Melytical Method- Standard Method 4500-Norg-Organic Nitrogen Standard Method 4500-Norg-Organic bumper,Ikandard Metbods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,"Amercan Public Health Association ® OIM1er Organic Ntrogen Analytical Method: Calculation Organic Nitrogen ® FPAMeWod 351.2-Total lfjehlahl Nitrogen EPA Method 3512-Total IgeldaM1lNuragen,'Determnation ofTotal lfjeldAl Nitrogen by Semi-Automated Colorimetry;'August Total l(leldahl Nitrogen 1993 Other Total lGeWahl Nitrogen Analytical Method: Other Analytes Standard Method 2540-Fixed Solids Standard Method 2540-Total,fixed,and volatile solids,"Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater;' Fired Solids American Puble Health Association Other Fixed Solids Analytical Method: ® EPAMetbod 9095-Paint Fiber liquids Test EPA Method 9095-Fund Fiber Equals Test,7cat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhyssaVacmical Methods;'EPAPub. Pant Filter Test SW-946 Other Pant Filter Test Analytical Method: � EPAMethod 9040-pHFs 7%wide) EPAMsthod 9040-PHF,7%solicish'Test Methods for Evaluating Soled Waste,PhyseaVOremcal Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 PH ® EPAMetbod 9045-PH(17%solids) EPAMethod 9045-pH(>7%sohds),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physkavaemical Methods;'EPA Pub.SW-846 Other pH Malytical Method: Standard Method 2710-SOUR Standard Method 27 10-Specific Oxygen Uptake Fine,"Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater;' Specific Oxygen Uptake American Public Health Association Rate Other Specific Oxygen Uptake Fate Analybeal McWod: ® EPAMethod 13 11-Toxicity Q,erectereic leaching EPA Method 1311-Toxicity Qrmaderistic leaching Procedure,'Test Methods for Ealuatng Sold Waste,PhyseaVQremical TQP Procedure Methods,"EPAPub.5W446 OtherA Analytical Method: Page 6 of 25 Parameter Method Number or Author Iiescription Text for Certification Section Standard Metbod 2550-Temperature Standard Method 2550-Temperature,"Standard Methods for the Examinaton of Water and Wastewater,"American Public Health Temperature Association Other TemperatureAnalytical Method: ® Standard Method 2540-Total Solids Standard Method 2540-Total,fixed,and volatile solids,"Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" Total9olicis American Public l akh Association Other Total Solids Analytical Method: ® Standard hletbod 2540-Wlutde Solids Standard Method 2540-Total,fixed,and volatile solids,'Standard Methods 6r the Examwatwn of Water and Wastewater" WlatJe Sokds American Public Health Jassociation Other W lane Solids Malylical Method: No Analytical Methods No Analytical Methods Used 23 What is the estimated total volume off,imoluds or sewage sludge produced at your facility for the reporting period(in dry metric tons)?' 29534 3.9osokds or Sewage Sludge Management EPANPDES regulations at 40 M503 only require reporting fun Idud applicatwn,surface disposal,or incwemticn.You have the option to select"Other Management Practice-ifyou wish to provide more mfurmatnn on how you manage your sewage sludge or bwsolids. Please use the selections below to Identify how sewage sludge or biosodds generated or produced at your facility was managed,used,or disposed by you or your factory for the reporting pound.You can use the button below to add as many Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(S )sections as needed to describe how you manage your sewage sludge. SSUD Sect ion Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(SSM):001 Management Practice Type Handler or Preparer Type* Management Practice Detail* Land Application Off-Ske Thhd-Party Handleror Preparer Agmulturalland Applicaton Please Note:lend Application includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give away)of©ass AEQ. Palk or BegNbnmircr' Pathogen Mis• Whore Amount(drymeMe tons)' Bulk Classes 26183 Pollutant Ibncentrations: DW the buddy land apply bulk sewage sludge when one or more pollutant contaminations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentration in Table 3 of40OFH503A ? OYes Qi No O Unknown Name of Off-Site]hind-Party Haudler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information for the Off-Site Thud-Party Handler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier.You may optionally lookup aNPDES D to auto-populate this insinuation.Iffields remain blank after clicking the Inok Up button,then no data mutts and you must enter the information Off-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer Information NPDFSO(ifknown) Page 7 of 25 Facilay/Company Name" T le Ranch/Ag-Tech Addrea 43N E Ashlan Ave. ay" State" Zip Code" Fresno "mu 93726 Off-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer Contact Information First Name• lest Name Title' Sheen Megan Owner Phone(10digits,No dashes)* W. &Mad Address' 5599709432 kart&a stexp.com Mosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to s entify the pathogen reduction options used by your facility far this sewage sludge unque identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply). Cade Pathogen Reduction Option Class A(must also demonstrate that meet fecal col8ann or salmonella limits) ❑ BI Class B-Ahemative I Fecal Callum Geometric Mean B21 Class BAltematiro 2 PSRP L Aerobe Digestion R22 CcmMemative 2 PSRP 2:An Drying ® B23 Class gNtermarw 2 PSRP 3:Anaerobic Digestion B24 Class Memative 2 PSRP 4:Composting B25 Class PAltemative 2 PSRP 5:IBne Stabilization ❑ H3 Class Mernative 3:PSRP Equivalency ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Page 8 of 25 Bioselids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by put facility or anotherperson/facilitytorthis sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply). Vector Attraction Reduction Options ® VR1 Option l-Volntde Sohds Reduction VR2 Option 2-Bench-Scale VAntfre Solids Reduction(Anaerobic Beach Teat) ❑ VR3 Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aimmue Beach Test with Percent Solids ofTwo percent or less) VR4 Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake are ❑ VR5 Option 5-Aerabic Prociaeng Obennophilic Aerobic Digestion/Composting) VR6 Option 6-Alkaline Treatment W Option 7-Drying(Bgnot to or Greater than 95 Percent) mut Option 8-Drymg(FA ual to or Greater than 90 Percent) VR9 Option 9-Sewage Sludge Injection ® MU Option I0-Sewage Sludge Thaely incorporation into land ❑ VRII Option II-Sewage sludge Covered at the End ofPach Operating Day Noncomn liamce Renaming Please use the check boxes below to militate any noncompliance with FPA's Federal sewage sludge program requirements(see 40 CFR503)for this facility during the reporting period.FPAnotes that any person who prepares sewage sludge(i.e.,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a material from sewage sludge)shall ensure that the applicable requirements in FPA's biombds regulations(40 CFR503)are met when the sewage sludge is applied to the land,placed on a surface disposal site,or feed in a sewage sludge incinerator(see 40Q 5039). Enna application Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or sold or gave away sewage sludge in a bag or other container when one ormore pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a land application telling pollutant limit(sac Table 1 of40 CFR503 13). Facility Failed to properly collect and analyze its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequency and approved analytical methods to order to obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding times)(see permit requirements and 40(M003 8). Facility had deficiencies with pathogen reduction(see 40 CFR509 321. ❑ Facility bad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 CFR 503331. Mal application ofbulk sewage sludge likely to adversely affeoted a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 ofthe Endangered Species Act orits designated criticalhabitat(see 40i 0914laN. Brlksewage sludge was app Red to agnouhural land,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation she that was flooded,frozen,or snow-covered such that the bulksewage sludge entered a wetland orotherwaters of the United States,as defined to 40 CPR 122 2 except as provided in a permit aimed pursuant to Section 402 or 404 ofthe(AA(sec 40 CFR 503 14(hl). ❑ Bilk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,or reclamation site was 10 meters or less from waters ofthe United States,as defined io 40 C711122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authomy(see 40 CFR503.I4(c)l. Bulk sewage sludge was appbed to agr cultuml land,forest,a pub he contact site,or reclamation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate for the bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofs reclamation site,otherwise specified by the permitting authority(see 40 M503.14I1)), Page 9 of 25 One or more label or information sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given may for land application hee 40Q 50314(ell. HLkc sewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 4503 13(b)(21 have been reached. The required notice and information was not provided to the land application applier(see 40 CFR503 12(A and fell. The inquired notice and orientation was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40(PR503.12fh1). The warned notice was not provided to the permitting authority forthe State in which bulk sewage sludge was applied tithe bulk sewage sludge was applied to land in a Slate other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40 C R503 IN)and 6p ❑ 'Ilia facility faded to keep the necessary records for preparers and appliers during the reporting period(see 40 CFR50327) When sewage sludge that meets acts Bpamogen reduction requirements,but not Qass A is applied to the land,additional site restrictions must be met.Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPA'sFedeml sewage sludge aass Bpathogen reduction requirements(see 40 M50331 for this facility during the reporting period. Food crops with harvested pans that touched the sewage sludge/soil mature(such as melons,cucumbers,squash,etc.)were harvested witbin 14 months after application ofsewage sludge(see 40 CFR503 320b951 Vail crops with harvested pans below the soil surface(root crops such as potatoes,tarots,radishes)were harvested within 20 months after application ofsewage sludge and the sewage sludge remained on the Ind surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil(see 60 CFR50332fbN5NJ11. Food crops with harvested pans below the sod surface(root crops such as potatoes,carrots,rodishes)were harvested within 38 months after application ofthe sewage sludge and the sewage sludge remained on the land surface for ess than for months priorto incorporation into the soil(see 40 GFR503.32(b)(5)(it Food crops,fed crops,and hoer crops were harvested within 30 days after application ofsewage sludge(me 40 CFR MO32fbN5 hhoR Animals were grand on a site within 30 days after application ofsewage sludge(see 40 CFR503 32(b)(5NvU. ❑ Tudwas harvested within 1 year after application ofsewage sludge ifthe turfwas placed on land with a high potential for public exposures or lawn,arbors otherwise specified by the perm@ting authority(see 40 M50332(b)(5Yvi11. Public access to land with high potential for public exposure was not restricted for 1 year after application ofsewage sludge(see 40 CFR503.32fbN5Nvulk Public access to land with a low potential for public exposure was not restricted mr30 days after application ofsewage sludge(see 40 CFR503 32(bN5Nviiill. SSUIDSectior Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier ISSUED):002 Management Practice Type Handleror Preparer Type' Management Produce Detail' Land App hcntion Off Site'lhhd-Party Handler or Preparer Dianbution and Marketing-Compost Please Note:Unit Application includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give away)ofQass AHQ. Balk or Bag/Container" Pathogen Mae" Yolume Amount(drymetflc tons)" Balk OassAEQ(aale/giveaway) 905 Pollutant@ncentrationr: Did the facility land apply bukcsewage sludge when one ormore pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant conceatratlun 1 Table 3 tf40 CFR50313? OYes O No O Unknown Name of Off-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information finite Oft-Site Third-Petty HandlerorP parerfrrtbr Sewage Sludge Unique HentifianYou may optionally lookup aNPDESDto auto-populate this information.Iffields remain blankafter eficking the Inok Up button,then no data exists and you must entertbe information Off-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer Information Page 10 of 25 NPD®D(ifkvowv) Facility/Company Name hland Baphe Regional Composting Authoody Md.. 12645 61h Sheet Uy* &ate* Zip Code" gaucho C4camonga "rnu 91739 Off-Site Thhd-Party Handler or Preparer Contact lnformahan First Name Last Name' Title' Jeff Tugenbeia F achy Manager Phone(10-digits,Nodashes)' FXt. &Mad Address' 9099931981 jziegenbein@ieua.arg Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the pathogen reduction options used by your facility for this sewage sludge unique identifier for me reporting period(check one or more that apply). Cade Pathogen Reduction Option Class A(must also demonstrate that meet fecal coliform or salmonella limits) Al /ass A-Alternative l:Time/Temperature A2 Class AAltemative2:PHTemperature/Percent Sobds A3 (ass A-Ahemative3:Test Fterc Yunses and l3elminth ova;Operating Parameters A4 (ass A-Altemative 4:Test Babette Viruses and Hehninth ova;NO New Solids ® A51 Gass A-Alternative S PFRP L Composting A52 (ass A-Altemative S PFRP 2:Heat Drying A53 Class A-Alternative S PFRP 3:Bquid Heat Treatment A54 (ass A-Altemative S PFRP 4:Thermophdic Aembc Digestion(ATAD) A55 (ass A-Alternative S PFPRS:Beta gay mediation A56 (ass A-Altemative S PFPR6:Crtmma Ray Irradiation A50 (ass AAlternative S PFRP]:Paetemimtion A6 Class A-Altemative 6:PFRP Equivalency ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Page 11 of 25 eiosolids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by put facility or anotberpersoNfacdityforthis sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or mom that apply) Vector Attracting Reduction Options ® VRI Option l-Wfatde Solids Reduction VU Option 2-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Anaembic Bench Test) ❑ W Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aerobic Beach Test with Percent Solids ofTwo Percent or Iess) VR4 Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake Role ® VF5 Option 5-Aerabic Processing Obennopbilic Aerobic Digestion/Composting) VR6 Option 6-alkaline Treatment W Option 7-Drywg(Fgnot to or Greater than 75 Percent) mut Option 8-Drying flu gal to or Greater than 90 Percent) Nonaomr liance Ran acting Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPAs Federal sewage sludge program requirements(see 40 M5031 for this facility during the reporting period.hPAuotes that anyperson who prepares sewage sludge(i.e,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a material&gm sewage sludge)sha0 ensure that the applicable requirements m EPAs biosolids regulations(40 M5031 annual when the sewage sludge is applied to the land,placad on a surface disposal site,or fired in a sewage sludge incinerator(sea 40 M503.71. Land Application Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or said or gave away sewage sludge in a bag or other container when one armors pollutant concentrations io the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceiling pollutant Iim6(sea Table 1 gf40 CPR503.131. Facility failed to properly collect and aaalyee its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequency and approved analytical methods in order to obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding times)(see permit requirements and 40(PR503 8). Facility had deficiencies with facing.reduction(see 40�j). Facility bad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 CFR503.331. Unit application ofbulk sewage sludge Idkety to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 oftbe Brdangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat(see 40 CFR503.14fa31 Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agriculural land,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation site that was flooded,branch,or snow-covered such that the bulk sewage sludge entered a wetland orotherwatem of the United States,as defined in 40 M 1222,except as provided in a permit issued pursuant o Section 402 or 404 oflhe MA(see 40 M503.14(b)). 9dk sewage sludge was app bed to agricultural land,forest,or a reclamation site was 10 meters or less Soon waters ofthe United Rates,as defined io 40 CFR 122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(see 40 CFR503 14(cll. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact sHe,ora reclamation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate foribe bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofa reclamation site,otherwise specified by the petmitung authority(see 40 t}R503 I-W. ❑ One or mom label or in formation sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given away for land appRation(see 40 QIR503.14(eu. ❑ park sewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 003 130,H2l have been reached. ❑ The required notice and inPormation was not provided to the land application appfier(see 40 CFIt503.12M and in Page 12 of 25 ❑ qhe required notice and InPormation was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40 CPR503.12fa1 ❑ qhe required notice was not provided to the permitting authority fir the State in wbhh bulk sewage sludge was applied ifthe bulk sewage sludge was applied to land in a Slate other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40 Q+It503126)and(i . qbe facility failed to keep the necessary records for preparers and Villiere during the reporting period(see 40 CPR 5032]l. SS11DSection Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(SSM):003 Management Practice Type• Handler or Prepmer Type* Management Practice Mod* Land Application Off-Site 1h6d-Party Handler or Preparer Agricultural land/ppliscom Please Note:land Application includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give away)of0ass AIO. Bu ,or Bag/Contamer* Pathogen Mass* Whine Amount(drymcbw tons)* Ealk Osss AEQ(sale/giveaway) 64 Pollutant Crncemmit ions: Dld the facility land apply bulanewage sludge when one ormore pollutant concentrations an the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentration in]able 3 af40 CPR503.139 O Yes Q No Q Unknown Name of Off-Site 9bird-Party Handleror Preparerfortbis Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information Rothe OR-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier.You may optionally lookup aNPDFSDto aum-populate this Inkrmation.Iffields remain blank after clicking the lark Up bourn,then no data exists and you must enterthe mkrmation Oft-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer Information NPD6m(ifknown) Facility/Company Name Synagro-Nursery Products Md.. PO Box 1439 City. State* Zip Code Heleadale &Gfomh 92342 Ott-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer Ground Information Firal Name• Iaat Name^ 718le Chad Brechel Area Mavager More(10digits,No dashes) Ed. Eli Address• 6613782515 cbuechel(a�YNAGdtO.com Bksrlids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the pathogen reduction options used by your buddy for this sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or mom that apply). Page 13 of 25 Code Pathogen Reduction Option Gass Almost also demonstrate that meet fecal coliform or salmonella limits) ❑ Al Oaas A-Altemative l:i e/Tempermum ❑ A2 Class A-Alternative 2:pH/Tempemure/Percent Sobds ❑ A3 Class A-Alternative 3:Tes[Fr[enc Viruses and Hehninth ova;Operating Pmameters ❑ A4 OasshAhsmativa,tTest Enteric Viruses and lialmmth ova;No New Solids ® MI Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 1:Composting ❑ A52 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 2:Heat Drying ❑ A53 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 3:liquid Heal Treatment ❑ A54 Gass hAltemative S PFRP 4:ghermophitio sombre Digestion(ATM) ❑ A55 Class A-Alternative S PFPRS:Beta Ray Irradiation ❑ Am Gass A-Ahem Live S PFPR6:Comma Ray Irradiation ❑ A50 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 7:Pastemonstlon ❑ A6 Gass A-Altemative 6:PFRP Fquivalenr, ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Diosolids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by your facJky or another person/facility for this sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply) Vector Attraction Reduction Options ® VRI Option l-Volatile Solids Reduction ❑ VR2 Option 2-Bench-Scale Volaff,Solids Raductiov(Anaembic Beach Test) ❑ Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aerobk Beach Teat with Percent Solids ofTyo Vm Percents less) ❑ VR4 Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake Fate ® VRS Option 5-Aerobic Processing MermophJic Acom is Digestion/Composting) ❑ VR6 Option 6-Aialine Treatment ❑ VR] Option]-DryingA mal to or Greater than lS Percent) ❑ MM Option 8-Drying(Equalto or Greater than 90 Percent) Noncom,lia,ce Re„rti,n Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPA's Federal sewage sludge program requirements(see 40 CFR503)for this facility during the reporting pored.FPAnotes that any person who prepares sewage sludge(i.e.,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a maternal from sewage sludge)shall ensure that the applicable requirements in FPA's bwsobds regulations(40 01R503)an met when the sewage sludge a applied to the and,placed on a surface disposal site,or feed ui a sewage sludge mciaerator(see 40Q 5037). Page 14 of 25 land Application ❑ Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or sold or gave away sewage sludge or a bag or other container when one ormom pollutant concentrations N the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceiling pollutant limit(see Table 1 of40(111503.131. Facility fated to properly collect and analyse its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequencyand approved analytical methods m orderto obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding tines)(see permit requirements and 40(FR5018). Facility had deficiencies with pathogen reduction(see 40�j). Facilityhad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 CFR503331. Iaud application off,ulk sewage sludge Rely to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 ofthe Endangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat(see dl CFRSo3_l4gft.. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation site that was flooded,frozen,or snrw.crvcwd such that the bulk sewage sludge entered a wetland or ther waters of the Up tied States,as defined in 40 M 1122 except as provided in a permit issued pumuant to Section 402 or 404 ofthe C A(see 40 CF .50314(bl). Bulk sewage sludge was app lied to agricultural land,forest,or a reclamation site was 10 meters or less from waters ofthe United States,as defined N 40 Q 122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(sec 40 CFR503 14(c)l. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact site,or reclemation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate for the bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofa reclamation site,otherwise specified by the petmiumg authority(see 40 Q0jjQ3 14(dll. ❑ One or more label or in formation sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given away for land application(see 40 CFIF50314(e)), Bdksewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 003 13(b)(2l have been reached. ❑ The required notice and information was not provided to the land application appfier(see 40 CFR503.12(tl and in The required notice and information was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40 CFR So3 12th1). The required notice was not provided to the permitting authority for the State in which bulk sewage sludge was applied ifthe bulk sewage sludge was applied to hand in a Slate other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40=50312(i)and lilt. The faNity faded to keep the necessary records for preparers and apphers during the reporting period(see 4o<t�27). SSUIDSection Sewage Sludge Onique Identifier(SSU D):004 Management Practice Type* Huddler or Preparer Type* Management Practice Mind* Iand Application Off-SkeThird-Party Handlero,Ptepare, Agmulturalland Applicator Please Note:Iand Appheatien includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give awn di fMis AEQ. Bulkor�g/Container• Pathogen Class* Whom,Amount(drymetric tons)• ®Ik (]ass AEQ(saId/giveaway) 1168 Pollutant Concentrations: Did the facility land apply buR sewage sludge when one or more pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentration m Table 3 of40 CEEM 13? OYea O No O Unlarm. Name dfOff-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information for the Od--Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique klentifier.Ydu may optionally lookup a"DES m to auto-populate this indentation.Iffields remain blank after chilling the Look Up button,then no data exists and you must enter the mPo®ation Off-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer Information Page 15 of 25 NPD®m(ifkaown) Facility/Company Name" Synagm—Saudi Ibm Compost h9ammucturmg Facility Md.. P.O.Box265 Uy" &ate• Zip Code" Tafl califoma 193268 Off-Site Mkd-Party Handler ur Preparer Contact Information First Name Lest Name' Title' (had arechel Area Manager Phone(10-0igits,Nodashes)' Est. &Mad Address' 6617652200 223 1 1 ebuechel@YNA(dtO.com Mosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the pathogen reduction options used by your facday for this sewage sludge unique identifier for me reporting period(check one or more that apply). Cade Pathogen Reduction Option Class A(must also demonstrate that meet fecal colifarm or salmonella limits) Al bass A-Altemative l:Thne/Temperature A2 Class A-Alternative 2:pHlTemperamrelPerceut Sohds A3 (lass A-Ahemative3:Test Fteric Ynnses and Helminth ova;Operating Parameters A4 Class A-Altemative 4:Test aterc Viruses and Hemanth ova;NO New Solids ® AS (lass A-Alternative S PFRP L Composting A52 (lass A-Altemative S PFRP 2:Heat Drying A53 Class AAltemative S PFRP 3:liquid Heat Treatment A54 (Bass A-Alternative S PFRP 4:ThermophJic Aembc Digestion(ATAD) A55 (lass A-Alternative S PFPRS:Beta Fay Intimation A56 (lass A-Altemative S PFPR6:(emma Ray Irradiation A50 Class A-Alternative S PFRP]:Pastemimtion A6 Class A-Altemative 6:PFRP Fyuivalene, ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Page 16 of 25 eiosolids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by put facility or anotberpersoNfacdityforthis sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or mom that apply) Vector Attracting Reduction Options ® VRI Option l-Wfatde Solids Reduction VU Option 2-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Anaembic Bench Test) ❑ W Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aerobic Beach Test with Percent Solids ofTwo Percent or Iess) VR4 Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake Role ® VF5 Option 5-Aerabic Processing Obennopbilic Aerobic Digestion/Composting) VR6 Option 6-alkaline Treatment W Option 7-Drywg(Fgnot to or Greater than 75 Percent) mut Option 8-Drying flu gal to or Greater than 90 Percent) Nonaomr liance Ran acting Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPAs Federal sewage sludge program requirements(see 40 M5031 for this facility during the reporting period.hPAuotes that anyperson who prepares sewage sludge(i.e,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a material&gm sewage sludge)sha0 ensure that the applicable requirements m EPAs biosolids regulations(40 M5031 annual when the sewage sludge is applied to the land,placad on a surface disposal site,or fired in a sewage sludge incinerator(sea 40 M503.71. Land Application Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or said or gave away sewage sludge in a bag or other container when one armors pollutant concentrations io the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceiling pollutant Iim6(sea Table 1 gf40 CPR503.131. Facility failed to properly collect and aaalyee its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequency and approved analytical methods in order to obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding times)(see permit requirements and 40(PR503 8). Facility had deficiencies with facing.reduction(see 40�j). Facility bad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 CFR503.331. Unit application ofbulk sewage sludge Idkety to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 oftbe Brdangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat(see 40 CFR503.14fa31 Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agriculural land,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation site that was flooded,branch,or snow-covered such that the bulk sewage sludge entered a wetland orotherwatem of the United States,as defined in 40 M 1222,except as provided in a permit issued pursuant o Section 402 or 404 oflhe MA(see 40 M503.14(b)). 9dk sewage sludge was app bed to agricultural land,forest,or a reclamation site was 10 meters or less Soon waters ofthe United Rates,as defined io 40 CFR 122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(see 40 CFR503 14(cll. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact sHe,ora reclamation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate foribe bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofa reclamation site,otherwise specified by the petmitung authority(see 40 t}R503 I-W. ❑ One or mom label or in formation sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given away for land appRation(see 40 QIR503.14(eu. ❑ park sewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 003 130,H2l have been reached. ❑ The required notice and inPormation was not provided to the land application appfier(see 40 CFIt503.12M and in Page 17 of 25 ❑ qhe required notice and hbarmation was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40 CPR503.12fr1 ❑ qhe required notice was not provided to the permitting authority for the State in wbhh bulk sewage sludge was applied ifthe bulk sewage sludge was applied to land in a State other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40 Q+R503126)and(i . qbe facility failed to keep the necessary records for preparers and appliem during the reporting period(see 40 CPR 5032]l. SSUDSection Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(SSUD):005 Management Practice Type• Handler or Prepmer Type* Management Practice Mod* Land Application Off-Site Th6d-Party Handler or Preparer Distribution and Mmketing-Compost Please Note:land Application includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give away)ofOass AEQ. Bulk or Bag/Container* Pathogen Gass* Whose Amount(drymetric tons)* Balk Gass A1Q(mIc/giveaway) 1215 Pollutant Concentrations: Dd the facility land apply bulanewage sludge when one ormore pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentmth t in]hbk 3 of40 CPR503.139 O Yes Q No Q Unknown Name of Off-Site 9bird-Party Handleror Preparerforthis Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information forth,Off Rm Thhd-Party Handler or Preparer for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier.You may optionally lookup aNPDPSDto auto-populam this inbafmatimu lffields remain blank after clicking the look Up button,then no data exists end you must enter the information Oft-Site Third-Party Handler or Prepafer Information NPD6D(if mown) Facility/Comparry Name Synagro-mbar ,Soil, Md.. 5615 S 91st Avenue City. State* Zip Code Tolleson Mims, 85353 Ott-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer Contact information Not Name• last Name^ 718le aaig Ccyer Senior OperationsN rurger Phoncti)digits,Nodashes)• Ed. 13Mad Address- 6239366328 CC wr@SYNACdtO.com Mosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the pathogen reduction options used by your facday bar this sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or mom that apply). Page 18 of 25 Code Pathogen Reduction Option Gass Almost also demonstrate that meet fecal coliform or salmonella limits) ❑ Al Oaas A-Altemative l:i e/Tempermum ❑ A2 Class A-Alternative 2:pH/Tempemure/Percent Sobds ❑ A3 Class A-Alternative 3:Tes[Fr[enc Viruses and Hehninth ova;Operating Pmameters ❑ A4 OasshAhsmativa,tTest Enteric Viruses and lialmmth ova;No New Solids ® MI Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 1:Composting ❑ A52 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 2:Heat Drying ❑ A53 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 3:liquid Heal Treatment ❑ A54 Gass hAltemative S PFRP 4:ghermophitio sombre Digestion(ATM) ❑ A55 Class A-Alternative S PFPRS:Beta Ray Irradiation ❑ Am Gass A-Ahem Live S PFPR6:Comma Ray Irradiation ❑ A50 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 7:Pastemonstlon ❑ A6 Gass A-Altemative 6:PFRP Fquivalenr, ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Diosolids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by your facJky or another person/facility for this sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply) Vector Attraction Reduction Options ® VRI Option l-Volatile Solids Reduction ❑ VR2 Option 2-Bench-Scale Volaff,Solids Raductiov(Anaembic Beach Test) ❑ Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aerobk Beach Teat with Percent Solids ofTyo Vm Percents less) ❑ VR4 Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake Fate ® VRS Option 5-Aerobic Processing MermophJic Acom is Digestion/Composting) ❑ VR6 Option 6-Aialine Treatment ❑ VR] Option]-DryingA mal to or Greater than lS Percent) ❑ MM Option 8-Drying(Equalto or Greater than 90 Percent) Noncom,lia,ce Re„rti,n Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPA's Federal sewage sludge program requirements(see 40 CFR503)for this facility during the reporting pored.FPAnotes that any person who prepares sewage sludge(i.e.,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a maternal from sewage sludge)shall ensure that the applicable requirements in FPA's bwsobds regulations(40 01R503)an met when the sewage sludge a applied to the and,placed on a surface disposal site,or feed ui a sewage sludge mciaerator(see 40Q 5037). Page 19 of 25 land Application ❑ Facility land applied buer sewage sludge or sold or gave away sewage sludge or a bag or other container when one ormore pollutant concentrations m the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceiling pollutant limit(see Table 1 of40 CFR503.131. Facility failed to properly collect and analyse its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequencyand approved analytical methods vt orderto obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding tines)(see permit requirements and 40(FR5h3R). Facility had deficiencies with pathogen reduction(see 40�j). Facility had deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 CFR503331. Iavd ap,hem on ofb ulk sewage sludge Only to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 ofthe Endangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat(see 40 CFR503_l4fa11. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,foresq a public contact site,or a reclamation site that was flooded,frozen,or snrw.crvcwd such that the bulk sewage sludge entered a wetland or ther waters of the United States,as defined in 40 M 1122 except as provided in a permit issued pursuant to Section 402 or404 ofthe CWA(see 40 Mt503 14(bl). Bill,sewage sludge was app lied to agricultural land,forest,or a reclamation site was 10 meters or less from waters ofthe United States,as definedfo 40 Q 122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(sea 40 C 50314(c)l. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact site,or a re lemation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate for the bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofa reclamation site,otherwise specified by the petmiumg authority(see 40(FR503 14W)).. ❑ One or more label or in formation sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given away for land application(we 40( 50314(e)), ❑ %ksewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 003 13(b)(2l have been reached. ❑ The required notice and information was not provided to the land application appher(see 40 M503.12(tl and in The required notice and information was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe lend on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40 ML50312(hl). The required notice was not provided to the permitting authority for the State in which bulk sewage sludge was applied ifthe bulk sewage sludge was applied to hand in a Slate other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40=50312(i)and(il). The faNity faded to keep the necessary records for preparers and apphers during the refunding period(see 40Lt�27). ® deck when done with SSM section.' Bosolids Wadding Data NSTE MONS:These monitoring data should be representative ofthe sewage sludge that was applied to land or placed on a surface disposal site during the reporting year see 40 M503 S(al.This section uses the frequency ofmonitormg requirements in 40 M503.16 and 50326.The following codes can be used as data qualifiers:T=Too Numerous to Count,E=Estimated,N=No Data. Maximum Pollutant Concentration Data for All Sewage Sludge Applied to Land' This section summarizes the maximum pollutant concentrations in sewage sludge Ihat was applied to land during the repotting year.In accordance with 40 CE1d503 13m,PPAS sewage sludge regulations prohibit land application ofbulk sewage sludge or sewage sludge sold or gave away sewage sludge in a bag or other container when one or more sewage sludge pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceed a land application ceding pollutant limit(see Tab to 1 cf40( 503.131.In order to identify noncompliance,BA will compare the pollutant concentrations in this section against the ceding concentration limits in Tab le I of40 M50313. Boselids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Memanament Type Unit ofWasure(Day Weight) Sample Type Arsenic Maximum mg/kg ODMFOS January Febmary March April May tune 6.8 1= 95 = 10 = 9.1 = 8.1 = 11 July August September October November December 83 5.] = 01 Page 20 of 25 Hosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type tail ofMeasure(Dry Weight) Sample Type Cadmium mg/kg ODMPOS January February March April May lure 25 33 3.4 I= 12A 22 July August September October November December 3.6 3.8 5.l Wsolids or Sewage Sludge Manhored Parameter heasurement Type Unit ofbleasure(Dry Weight) Sample Type Copper Madmum mg/kg CDMPDS January February March April May June 450 500 510 = 550 = 470 = 470 July August September Weber November December, 550 480 520 = 490 = 570 = 520 go solids or Sewage Sludge Mannered Parameter h4emamment Tye Unit ofbieaaure(Dry Weight) Sample Type Inad Maximum mg/kg ODMPOS January Romery March April May June 11 I< 18 12 1 1 15 11 < 20 July Augur September October November December < 10 12 14 13 IS Id 6oso0ds or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Meaamement'fype Unit ofMeamm(Dry Weight) Sample'fype h1ereary hfaximum mg/kg ODMPOS ]emery February blurb April blay June 0.70 12 l-o 12 0.94 1.3 July Augur[ September October November December 1.0 0.74 1 12 0.92 0.89 0.82 9osolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofMaaame(Dry Weight) Sample Type Molybdenum mg/kg M6 s lanuary February March April May June 12 = 14 = 14 = 16 = 15 = 16 July August September October November December 18 = 15 = 18 = Ib = Ib = 16 Page 21 of 25 Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type UnLL ofMeasure(Dry Weight) Sample Type N kcl mg/kg ODMPOS January February March April May June 49 1= 33 = 33 I= 131 = 30 = 32 July Angnsl September October November December 31 30 35 = 30 36 = 28 Baseline or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofMeasure(Ay Weight) Sample Type Ntrogen Average mg/kg CDMPOS January February March April May June woo 450M 45000 = 41)00 = 41000 = 44000 July August September October November December 52000 500M 45000 = 45000 = 42000 = 41000 Hosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofMeasure(Dr,Weight) Sample Type Selenium Maximum mg/kg ODMPOS January Feb.., March April May hire 11 1 12 8.9 11 62 10 July August September October November December 8.0 1 9.4 1 8.4 Hosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofMcamm(Dry Weight) Sumple Type Tine Maximum mg/kg cDMPOS January February March April May lure 680 710 ]40 790 1 1 700 ]40 July August September October November December 840 730 1 1 790 ]40 830 820 Monthly Average Pollutant Concentration Data for All Sewage Sludge Applied to Iand this section summarizes the monitoring-period average pollutant concentrations in sewage sludge that was applied to and during the reporting year. 9osohds or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofMeaserre(Dry Weight) Sample Type Arsenic I mg/kg WWOS January February March April May lure = 6.8 = 85 = 8.] = 8.8 = 7.5 = 10 July August September October November December = ZS = 5.6 = 63 Page 22 of 25 Hosolids or Sewage Sludge Warmed Parameter Measurement Type tail ofMeasure(➢ry Weight) Sample Type Cadmium Average mg/kg ODMPOS January February March April May lure 23 1= 29 = 3.1 I= 121 1= 2.0 MY Auguat September October November December 33 3.6 43 = 6l 6] = 52 Wsolids or Sewage Sludge Manhored Parameter h/easurement Type Uak ofMeasure(Ay Weight) Sample Type Copper Average mg/kg Cows January February March April May June 410 450 = 490 = 520 = 460 = 460 Joy August September Weber November December, 510 480 510 = 490 = 530 = 490 go solids or Sewage Sludge Mannered Parameter h4eaamement Type Unt ofbieaaure(Dry Weight) Sample Type Inad Avenge mg/kg MD s January Romery March April May June 9.7 1< 18 12 1 15 11 < 20 July Augur September Oetober November December < 10 12 14 13 IS 13 6oso0ds or Sewage Sludge Menkored Parameter Meaamement'fype Una ofMeamm(Dry Weight) Sample'fype h1ereury Avenge mg/kg ODMPOS January February blurb April blay Juve 0.65 LI 0.85 1 0.91 1 1 0.94 1.2 July Augur[ September October November December 0.94 0.72 1 12 0.52 0.88 0.82 9osolids or Sewage Sludge hlontomd Parameter h1aasrmment Type Unk ofMaaame(Dry Weight) Sample Type Told Average mg/kg MMPOS lanuary February March April May lane 41 1= 31 = 33 = 31 = 29 = 32 Job, August September Oewbar November December 30 1= 30 1= 35 = 30 = 32 = 2] Page 23 of 25 Hosolids or Sewage Sludge Wakened Parameter Measurement Type WLL ofMeasure(1),Weight) Sample Type Selenium I mg/kg OOMPOS January February March April May June 9.4 7.6 8.4I= I to 5.5 July Auguat September Weber November December 7.8 6.7 83 Wsolids or Sewage Sludge hbvitmed Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofMeasure(Ay Weight) Sample Type Ane Average mg/kg OOWOS January February March April May June 620 MO 730 = 760 1= 700 = 720 July August September October November December 790 1= 730 = 750 = 740 = 760 = 760 Pathogens:(.lass A Fecal Wiform* 9osolids or Sewage Sludge blanketed Parameter Measurement Type Wit ofMeasure(Dry Weight) Sample Type Fecal Ge form Geometric Mean WN/gram 1 CiltA137 January February March April May June Buly August September October November December N Pathogens:©ass A,Salmonella* Rosolis or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Witofhlessure May Weight) Sample Type Salmonella Geome[rk Meav 1,1PNpar4gmms 1 Q 7 January Febmary March April May June N I July August September October November December N Vector Attmetion Aeduofion-Volatile Solids Options(Options 1-3) Page 24 of 25 Biosolidsor Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Wit ofWasure(Dry Weight) Sample Type Solids,total volatile percent removal Percent January February March April May Arne 65 60 62 = 59 63 = 62 brty Augrat September October November December 59 60 59 = 68 65 = 62 Additional Information Please enter any additional nomination ation m the comment boxbelow(knit to 3901)characters)that you would km to provide. -Reported"organicnitrogen in Witrogen"fields above. -Attached is t)GSds Bimolids Management Compliance Report including the Priority Pollutants report in Appendis C -IX Ddoesnot monitor biosohds for indicator organisms because we produce Class Bvietime and temperature in anaerobic digesters ON chosen for fecal coliform and sahnonelk) -Reported value for WRRis an average calculation using two flow-weighted sample results and average monthly flows. -Per OfSD1 email to FPAon 2/2/19,for consistency with(3CSD's historical reporting practices,O6'D has reported our biosohds data to the reporting fruit(P4 O Dwill follow-up with FPAto address this matter for 2017repo Ling. Additional Attachments File:2016_O6'D Annual_aosolids_Compliance_Report 503.pdf Certification luformation G:rtifier6Mail" os,@,rsd.co ®Con&m@rtifi r:moss®csd.crm" Page 25 of 25 Y 9� NE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Laboratory, Monitoring& Compliance Division 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 714.962.2411 www.ocsd.com 1/17 Orange County Sanitation District Semi-Annual Pretreatment Program Report Resource Protection Division Q,Pty SNNIIN JJo WV � � 9 � � b ffCl ? 'NN iNF EM�P JULY - DECEMBER Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Serving. Orange County Sanitation District Anaheim 10844 Ellis Avenue,Fountain Valley,CA 92708 714,962.2411 www.ocsd.com Brea Buena Park Cypress Fountain Valley March 28, 2017 Fullerton Garden Grove Kurt V. Berchtold, Executive Officer California Regional Water Quality Control Board Huntington Beach Santa Ana Region 3737 Main Street, Suite 500 Irvine Riverside, CA 92501-3339 La Habra Subject: Pretreatment Program Semi-Annual Report La Palma July 1 through December 31, 2016 Los Alamitos The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) is submitting this semi-annual Newport Beach report for enforcement activities conducted during the period of July 1 through Orange December 31, 2016. These activities include inspection and sampling of permittees, enforcement actions OCSD has taken to remedy noncompliance, and Placentia information on the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority pretreatment program under OCSD's jurisdiction. Santa Ana Appendix I of this report, entitled Monitoring and Compliance Status Report, Seal Beach contains the number of industrial inspections and the number of OCSD and self- Stanton monitoring samples for each OCSD Class I permittee for the first and second quarters of Fiscal Year 2016/17. Tustin If you or your staff have any questions, please contact me at(714) 593-7437 or Villa Park Lori McKinley at (714) 593-7505. County of Orange �7 Cosa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City 4Roya Sohanaki Sanitary District Resource Protection Manager Irvine Ranch RS:lam Water District H:tr pt�es%20\ISCla frunokinkylSAR Semi-Annual Repon2016-17Uuty-December2016\i_Cover Ledecdoc Yorba Linda c: EPA Region 9, CWA Compliance Office Water District SWRCB Pretreatment Program Manager submitted electronically to civgs.waterboards.ra.gov, 16 R9pretreatment@epa.gov,and NPDES Wastewater@waterboards.ca gov Our Mission: To protect public health and the environment by providing effective wastewater collection, treatment, and recycling. CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The following certification satisfies the reporting requirements under Section E, Order No. R8- 2012-0035, for the Orange County Sanitation Districts Pretreatment Requirements, NPDES Permit No. CA0110604, for the submittal of the attached Semi-Annual Report. All reports shall be signed by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected or appointed official or a duly authorized representative of a principal executive officer or ranking elected or appointed official. A duly authorized representative of a principal executive officer or ranking elected or appointed official may sign the reports only if: a. The authorization is made in writing by a principal executive officer or ranking elected or appointed official; b. The authorization specifies either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of plant manager, superintendent, or position of equivalent responsibility. (A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position); and c. The written authorization is submitted to the Regional Board and EPA. Each person signing a report required by this permit or other information requested by the Regional Board or EPA shall make the following certification: 9 certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction orsupervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." R 03I28I2017 Royb Sohanaki Date Resource Protection Manager TABLE OF CONTENTS Pane 1.0 PERMITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 1.1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 1.2 Class I Permits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 1.3 Class 11 Permits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 1.4 Wastehauler Permits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 1.5 Special Purpose Discharge Permits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 1.6 Urban Runoff Permits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-2 1.7 FOG (Fats, Oil, and Grease) Permits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-2 1.8 Discharge Certifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-2 1.9 Summary of Permits in Effect. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-3 2.0 ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 2.1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 2.2 Compliance Inspections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 2.3 Compliance Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 2.4 Probation Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 2.5 Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSA) . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 2.6 Regulatory Compliance Schedule Agreement (RCSA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2 2.7 Administrative Penalties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2 2.8 Permit Suspension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2 2.9 Permit Revocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2 2.10 Emergency Suspension Order . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-3 2.11 Industries with Discharge Violations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-3 2.12 Enforcement—Summary by Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-4 3.0 SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY(SAWPA) . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 3.0 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 3.1 SARI (Brine Line) System Pretreatment Program Overview . . . . . . . . . 3-1 3.2 SAWPA Pretreatment Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-2 3.2.1 Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-2 3.2.2 Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4 3.2.3 Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-8 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Pane 3.2.4 San Bernardino Municipal Water Department (SBMWD) . . . . . 3-11 3.2.5 San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (Valley District) 3-14 3.2.6 SAWPA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-15 3.2.7 Liquid Waste Hauler(LWH) Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-28 3.2.8 Western Municipal Water District (WMWD). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-30 3.3 Permittees in Significant Noncompliance (SNC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-35 3.4 Future Projects that will Affect Quantity of Discharge to the Brine Line System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-36 3.5 SAWPA Special Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-36 3.6 Brine Wastewater Effluent Characteristics at OCSD's SARI Metering Station (SMS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-37 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 Active Permits July 1 - December 31, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-3 Table 2.1 Industries with Discharge Violations July 1 —December 31, 2016 . . . . 2-3 Table 3.1 Average Heavy Metal Discharge Concentrations and Treated Monthly Flows at the Stringfellow Clean-up Site, as Reported by SAWPA, July 1, 2016— December 31, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-20 Table 3.2 Summary of SAWPA and Member/Contract Agency Permittees in Significant Noncompliance (SNC), July 1 —December 31, 2016 . . . . . 3-36 Table 3.3 SAWPA Daily Average Concentration (mg/L) and Mass (lb/day) Measured from Weekly Sampling at OCSD's Green River Meter, July—September 2016. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-37 Table 3.4 SAWPA Daily Average Concentration (mg/L) and Mass (lbs/day) Measured from Weekly Sampling at OCSD's Green River Meter, October— December 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-38 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix I Monitoring and Compliance Status Report chapter 1 PERMITS 1.0 PERMITS 1.1 Introduction The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) industrial wastewater discharge permit system provides the means to limit the discharge of specific pollutants from industrial facilities and to establish a pollutant inventory from industrial dischargers. The following sections describe the types of OCSD permits and how many permits were issued for the period July 1 through December 31, 2016. There are seven permit and certification classifications for users that are administered by OCSD's Pretreatment Program: Class I, Class 11, Wastehauler, Special Purpose, Urban Runoff, Fats/Oil/Grease (FOG), and Discharge Certification. 1.2 Class I Perrnits During this reporting period, eight new permits were issued for those users who: a. are subject to Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards; or b. average 25,000 gallons per day or more of regulated process wastewater; or c. have been determined by the General Manager to have a reasonable potential for adversely affecting OCSD's operation or for violating any pretreatment standard, local limit, or discharge requirement; or d. may cause, as determined by the General Manager, pass-through or interference with OCSD sewerage facilities. 1.3 Class II Permits During this reporting period, no new permits were issued for those users who: a. have a charge for use greater than the ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to OCSD, and b. discharge waste other than sanitary, and c. are not otherwise required to obtain a Class I Permit. 1.4 Wastehauler Permits During this reporting period, six new permits were issued for those users who are engaged in vehicular transport and disposal of acceptable waste into OCSD's system. The disposal of hazardous waste is illegal and not acceptable under the terms of this permit category. 1.5 Special Purpose Discharge Permits During this reporting period, four new permits were issued to those users who discharge groundwater, surface runoff, subsurface drainage, or unpolluted water to OCSD's system. This permit is granted when no alternative method of disposal is reasonably available or to mitigate an environmental risk or a health hazard. 1-1 1.6 Urban Runoff Permits OCSD accepts the diversion of urban runoff to the sewer for treatment to remediate various public health and environmental problems which are infeasible to economically or practically control through traditional stonnwater best management practices. The Resource Protection Division administers the Urban Runoff Diversion Program through the issuance of a discharge permit for each of the diversion structures. The permit establishes discharge limits, constituent monitoring, and flow metering requirements, as well as provides guidelines that specifically prohibit storm runoff and authorizes discharge only during periods of dry weather. OCSD also conducts quarterly sampling and analysis of the urban runoff discharges to ensure discharge limit compliance with the various regulated constituents. The role of the Urban Runoff Diversion Program has recently expanded to include the mediation of selenium-laden waters reaching the Upper Newport Bay. The Peters Canyon Diversion agreement and permit were completed late last year, and Non-Industrial Source Control (NISC) is working on an amendment to the Big Canyon agreement which will add a second diversion in this area to allow additional flows. Orange County Watersheds estimates that the diversion of Peters Canyon Wash and Big Canyon tributaries will decrease the amount of selenium reaching the bay by 150 to 250 pounds annually. OCSD issued one new Urban Runoff permit, Peters Canyon, during this reporting period. There are currently 20 active Urban Runoff diversions under permit, three owned and operated by the County of Orange, 11 owned and operated by the City of Huntington Beach, three owned and operated by the Irvine Ranch Water District, two owned and operated by the City of Newport Beach, and one owned and operated by PH Finance (present owner of the Pelican Point Resort). 1.7 FOG (Fats. Oil. and Grease) Permits On April 13, 2016, the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission approved East Orange County Water District's(EOCWD) application to accept the transfer of the sewers within OCSD's Service Area 7, which included the Tustin area and several adjacent unincorporated areas of Orange County. The transfer of all assets was completed in August 2016. This change in ownership also affected the responsibility for implementing the FOG control program in the newly created service area. As of the transfer, OCSD is no longer the administering authority for the program in the transfer area. OCSD continues to manage a limited FOG control program for approximately 40 food service establishments that discharge directly to OCSD owned trunklines in the City of Orange. During this reporting period, OCSD renewed 17 FOG permits to existing permihees and issued 1 new FOG permit to an existing food service establishment under new ownership. 1.8 Discharne Certifications During this reporting period, three discharge certifications were issued, including two Zero Discharge Certifications. These are issued through a Certification of Zero Discharge for those industries that have operations subject to a federal category regulated by the EPA, but do not discharge industrial wastewater generated from these operations to the sewer. 1-2 1.9 Summary of Permits in Effect A summary of permit activity during the period July 1 through December 31, 2016, is shown in Table 1.1. TABLE 1.1 — ACTIVE PERMITS July 1 - December 31, 2016 Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division New Permits Companies Under Permit Type Issued Permit Class I Categorical 3 180 Class I Non-Categorical 5 154 Class I TOTAL 8 334 Discharge Certification 3 26 Class II 0 20 Wastehauler 6 40 Special Purpose 4 52 Urban Runoff 1 20 FOG 1 39 TOTAL 23 531 1-3 chapter 2 ENFORCEMENT 2.0 ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES 2.1 Introduction The goals of the Orange County Sanitation District's(OCSD)industrial wastewater enforcement program are to bring its permitted industrial users into compliance with OCSD's Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance) and discharge limits, and to control and reduce industrial pollutants. In addition to assessing noncompliance fees, issuing Notices of Violation,and sending compliance letters,other types of enforcement actions can be taken against industrial violators. These actions include compliance inspections, compliance meetings, Probation Orders, Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreements (ECSAs), Regulatory Compliance Schedule Agreements (RCSAs), Administrative Penalties, Permit Suspension, Permit Revocation, and Emergency Suspension Orders. This report describes the enforcement actions that OCSD initiated or continued against noncompliant permittees for the semi-annual reporting period of July 1 through December 31, 2016. Appendix I of this report, entitled Monitoring and Compliance Status Report, contains information regarding the number of industrial inspections and the number of OCSD and self-monitoring samples taken for each Class I permittee for the first and second quarters of Fiscal Year 2016/17. Each company's name, permit number, and address are given in the first three columns. Additional columns present the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)code, applicable pretreatment regulation, the number of performed inspections, the number of completed samples,the number of pollutant(s)in discharge violations, and applicable comments. 2.2 Compliance Inspections When a permittee is determined to be violating discharge limits, an engineer and a Source Control inspector conduct special inspections to identify and assess the noncompliance problems, require corrective actions, and monitor the progress of those permittees operating under the terms and conditions of ECSAs. Fifteen(15)compliance inspections were conducted during the first and second quarters. 2.3 Compliance Meetings Compliance meetings are called because of a company's inability to achieve compliance with discharge requirements and/or comply with OCSD's Ordinance. The meetings are held with OCSD staff to discuss discharge problems and proposed solutions. Four(4)compliance meetings were conducted during the first and second quarters. 2.4 Probation Orders Pursuant to Section 602.1 of OCSD's Ordinance, a Probation Order may be issued if a company has violated any terms, conditions, or limits of its discharge permit or OCSD's Ordinance, or has not paid all amounts owed to OCSD. The term of the Probation Order may not exceed 90 days and the company is required to comply with all directives, conditions, or requirements within the time specified. No Probation Orders were issued in the first and second quarters. 2.5 Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSA) If a permittee is in noncompliance with the terms,conditions,or limits specified in the permit or the Ordinance and needs to construct and/or acquire and install equipment related to pretreatment, OCSD may require the 2-1 company to enter into an ECSA. The ECSA contains terms and conditions by which the company must operate and specifies dates for construction and/or acquiring and installing the pretreatment equipment and achieving compliance. No ECSAs were issued during the first and second quarters. 2.6 Regulatory Compliance Schedule Agreement (RCSA) Subsequent to the issuance of an Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit to an industrial user, federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards may be adopted or revised by the EPA, or OCSD may enact revised discharge limits. If the General Manager determines that a company would not be in compliance with the newly adopted or revised limits, the company may be required to enter into a RCSA with OCSD. The terms and conditions of a RCSA require the company to achieve compliance with all new standards by a specific date. RCSAs have a maximum term of two-hundred seventy(270)days. The issuance of a RCSA may contain terms and conditions including, but not limited to, requirements for installation of pretreatment equipment and facilities, submittal of drawings or reports, waste minimization practices, or other provisions to ensure compliance with OCSD's Ordinance. While the RCSA is in effect, any discharge by the company in violation of the RCSA will require payment of noncompliance sampling fees in accordance with Article 6 of OCSD's Ordinance. There were no RCSAs issued during the first and second quarters. 2.7 Administrative Penalties Pursuant to the authority of California Government Code Section 54740.5,OCSD may issue an Administrative Complaint against the responsible officer or owner of any company that violates any permit condition or effluent limit. There were no Administrative Penalties issued during the first and second quarters. 2.8 Permit Suspension OCSD staff may seek permit suspension if a permittee fails to comply with the terms and conditions of an ECSA, RCSA, or Probation Order; fails to provide reports; batch dumps; or violates any condition or limit of a discharge permit or Ordinance provision. When OCSD believes that grounds exist for permit suspension, the company is notified in writing of the reasons for permit suspension and the date of the permit suspension hearing. At the hearing, OCSD staff and the permittee are provided the opportunity to present their evidence to the Hearing Officer. After the hearing, a written determination is made and upon order of suspension the company will have no right to discharge to the sewer for the duration of the suspension. No permit suspensions were ordered during the first and second quarters. 2.9 Permit Revocation The grounds for permit revocation are the same as those of permit suspension and include failure to comply with a permit suspension, failure to submit a notice of bypass, or causing a pass-through or interference incident. The hearing process is also the same as that of the permit suspension, but the consequence of permit revocation is the permanent end of sewer service. No permit revocations were ordered during the first and second quarters. 2-2 2.10 Emergency Suspension Order Pursuant to Section 613 of OCSD's Ordinance, an Emergency Suspension Order may be ordered to stop an actual or impending discharge that presents or may present an imminent or substantial endangerment to the health and welfare of persons or to the environment; may cause interference to OCSD's sewerage facilities; or may cause OCSD to violate any state or federal law or regulation. No Emergency Suspension Orders were issued during the first and second quarters. 2.11 Industries with Discharge Violations The table below lists those facilities with discharge violations between July 1"— December 31xt, 2016, and whether the violation(s)exceeded Federal Categorical Standard (FCS) Limits, OCSD Loral Limits, or both. TABLE 2.1-INDUSTRIES WITH DISCHARGE VIOLATIONS July 1-December 31,2016 Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division Constituent(s) in Exceeded Exceeded Facility Permit No. Violation Date FCs Local Limit Limit Cadillac Plating, Inc. I-MI062 Zinc 121092016 J Cal-Aurum Industries, Inc. 1-111099 CN 11/142016 J Cartel Electronics 1{21814 Copper 11/222016 J J Cooper and Brain, Inc. 1-031070 O&G 10/132016 J Dunham Metal Processing 1-021325 Chromium, 12/152016 J J Copper, Lead 1222/2016 08/302016 Electrolurgy, Inc. 1-071162 Cadmium 09/232018 J J 10212018 FMH Aerospace Corp DBA FMH 07202016 Corporation 1571331 pH, Silver 10/272016 J J Gallade Chemical, Inc. 1-011257 pH 10262016 J Green Clean Water&Waste 1-521857 Titanium 11/1 52 01 6 J Services Hi Tech Solder 1-521790 Copper 0 9/1 312 01 6 J Hixson Metal Finishing 1-061115 Chromium 09232016 J J&J Marine Aquisitions, LLC 1-551152 Copper 091)72016 J Logi Graphics, Inc. 1-031049 Copper 0928/2016 J 0920/2016 09292016 09/30/2016 Marukome USA, Inc. 1-141023 pH 10/03/2016 J 10/01/2016 10/052016 10/182016 Chromium, 08/122016 Paramount Chrome Plating, Inc. 1-611415 Copper, Ni ], aJ272016 J J Zinc 12/272016 2-3 TABLE 2.1-INDUSTRIES WITH DISCHARGE VIOLATIONS July 1-December 31,2016 Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division Constituent(s) in Exceeded Exceeded Facility Permit No. Violation Date Fcs Local Limit Limit RBC Transport Dynamics Corp. "11013 Chromium, 12/072016 J J Nickel, Zinc Safran Electronics&Defense, 09/012016 t-sn3o4 Silver J Avionics USA, I.I.C. 1v152o1s Sanmina Corporation (Redhill) 1-061009 Copper 10/052016 d Ultra-Pure Metal Finishing, Inc. 1-W703 1 Zinc OW252018 Viasystems Technologies 1-521859 Copper 11/032016 J Corpora LLC 2.12 Enforcement — Summary by Company CD Video (Permit No. 1-511076) CD Video Inc. (CD Video) is a manufacturer of computer and digital video discs(CDs and DVDs), which are sold to retail music and video stores. Operations include cleaning and resist stripping of master discs followed by electroless nickel plating and associated rinsing. Wastewater is treated in a packaged treatment unit which includes pH adjustment, a settling tank, microfiltration of decanted effluent, and solids filtration. In February 2015,CD Video had a nickel violation. In March 2015,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection, during which CO Video indicated that the acid addition line on the treatment unit failed, thus causing the violation, but it was immediately repaired upon discovery. In January 2016, OCSD held a compliance meeting with CD Video, during which the company indicated that they had their I/X vendor install a more effective canister since they believed that the source of the cadmium was the recently installed canister. Previous inspections conducted by OCSD have not found any sources of cadmium at CD Video. July 1 —December 31, 2016 CD Video had no further violations during this reporting period. No further enforcement is necessary. CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp. (Permit No. 1-5218491 CJ Foods Manufacturing Corp. (CJ Foods) is a food company manufacturing various dumplings. Wet processes include cleaning of processing &packaging equipment, boiler blowdown and other miscellaneous preparation area wash down. Pretreatment is limited to a three-stage clarifier. In September and December 2015, CJ Foods had pH violations. In March 2016, OCSD conducted a follow- up inspection and found the pH adjustment equipment already installed and functional. The facility had also increased the frequency of clarifier pump-out to monthly believing that accumulated solids were contributing to the pH problem. 2-4 July 1 —December 31.2016 CJ Foods had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to monitor CJ Foods discharge and compliance status during the next quarter. Cadillac Plating. Inc. (Permit No. 1-021062) Cadillac Plating is a job shop that performs various metal finishing operations on steel and aluminum parts. Processes include alkaline and acid chloride zinc plating, bright tin plating, bright nickel plating, sulfuric anodizing, alkaline cleaning, acid activation, chromate conversion coating, chemfilm, and associated rinses. The facility engages in rack plating only. The facility operates a continuous hydroxide pretreatment system with pH adjustment, hexavalent chromium reduction, flocculent addition, clarification, and sludge dewatering with a filter press. Spent solutions are treated in a batch mode, with the batch treatment effluent routed through the continuous pretreatment system for further treatment. July 1 —December 31, 2016 On December 9, 2016, Cadillac plating had a zinc violation. OCSD will pursue enforcement in the next quarter. Cal-Aurum Industries, Inc. (Permit No. 1-111089) The facility is a large job shop exclusively dedicated to processing customer-supplied parts. Cal-Aurum specializes in precious metals plating, providing services for aerospace, communications, electronics, and military applications. The wet processing proceeds by rack, barrel, and continuous reel-to-reel techniques. Wastewater is generated from the cleaning,coating,common and precious metals electroplating,electroless plating, etching, finish stripping, and rinsing of parts. Cal-Aurum utilizes a batch pretreatment system for treating spent solutions,and a continuous pretreatment system for all other wastestreams. Thecontaminated rinses receive pH adjustment and hydroxide precipitation prior to discharge to the sewer. Cal-Aurum also uses a filter press for dewatering the sludge from the batch treatment operation. The filtrate is pumped to a final polishing filter then to a holding tank where it is tested for compliance prior to discharge. July 1 —December 31, 2016 On November 14, 2016, Cal-Aurum had a total and amenable cyanide violations. OCSD will pursue enforcement in the next quarter. Cartel Electronics(Permit No. 1-521814) Cartel Electronics is a medium-sized full service printed circuit board manufacturing facility. Circuit boards are manufactured from innerlayers through lamination and microdrilling, then outerlayer photoprinting, developing, copper and tin pattern plating, and copper etching/tin stripping followed by soldennask coating, legend screening, and final routing and electrical testing before packaging and shipment to customers. Cartel also offers electroless nickel and gold plating for final surface and connector tab coatings. Wastewater comes from the chemical and plating processes and associated rinses. Cartel employs both batch and continuous pretreatment,which consists of ion exchange treatment for low metal concentration wastestreams. Regeneration of the ion exchange columns is performed onsite, and the regenerant waste is batch treated. A filter press is utilized to dewater the solids from the batch treatment. July 1 —December 31. 2016 On November 22,2016, Cartel had a copper violation. OCSD will pursue enforcement in the next quarter. 2-5 Cooper& Brain (Permit No. 1-0310701 Cooper& Brain is a large oil field located in Brea,with 14 active well sites generating a crude oil/ groundwater mixture which is pumped into a 40,000-gallon steel holding tank for crude oil/groundwater separation, or washing. The groundwater flows out the bottom of the holding tank into four clarifier tanks before discharge to the sewer. July 1 —December 31, 2016 On October 13,2016, Cooper& Brain had an oil &grease violation. OCSD issued a Notice of Violation with resample requirement to Cooper&Brain on December 29, 2016. OCSD will await the results of Cooper&Brain's resampling next quarter before taking any further enforcement action. Dunham Metal Processina(Permit No.1-0213251 Dunham Metal Processing (Dunham) is a small metal finishing job shop that specializes in clear, color, and multicolor sulfuric anodizing on aluminum parts for the aerospace, automotive, electronics, medical, and sporting goods industries. Wastewater is generated from the various spent process solutions and associated rinses. Dunham does not have a BAT pretreatment system. It has an aboveground three-stage clarifier where the alkaline and acidic wastestreams are used, in addition to virgin acid and caustic solutions, for pH adjustment. Most concentrated spent solutions are either wastehauled offsite and/or reused to make up new process solutions. The spent anodizing solutions are used to make up fresh deoxidizer. The dye solutions are mostly replenished but are sometimes bled in small amounts into the general wastestream which flows into the sample point without pretreatment other than pH adjustment. Sludges from tank bottoms are pumped once every three or four years and wastehauled offsite. July 1 — December 31, 2016 On September 16, 2016, OCSD discovered a hose discharging city water into the pipe between the pretreatment system and the sample point,which diluted the effluent during the sampling event. This dilution of industrial wastewater discharge is in violation with Section 202 of the Ordinance and the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 Section 403.6(d). During the same sampling event,a low pH value of 5.3 was measured in the final compartment of the clarifier immediately preceding the sample point. On November 2, 2016, OCSD held a compliance meeting with Dunham to discuss corrective measures required to achieve long-term compliance. OCSD also conducted a compliance inspection on December 6, 2016. In December 2016, Dunham was issued an NOV for a pH violation(2.93 against the pH 6 lower limit) that occurred in May 2016. On December 15 and December 22, 2016, OCSD conducted additional compliance inspections and sampling of Dunham's wastewater discharge effluent. The December 15,2016 sample yielded a major lead violation while the December 22, 2016 sample yielded major copper and lead instantaneous violations, and a minor chromium instantaneous violation. OCSD will pursue escalated enforcement in the next reporting period. Electrolurov. Inc.(Permit No.1-071162) Electrolurgy is a large job shop specializing in finishing services for aerospace,electronics,industrial,medical, and military/defense applications. The wet processing of typical aluminum part begins with alkaline cleaning/etching followed by deoxidation and anodizing; or followed by activation (zincate, copper strike, or nickel strike) and the specified surface finish (electroless nickel, cadmium, or tin plate). The processing of a typical steel part proceeds by alkaline cleaning, hydrochloric activation/descale followed by the specified surface finish (brite nickel, cadmium, copper, electroless nickel). Stainless steel parts generally receive 2-6 alkaline cleaning followed by passivation or electropolishing. The processing of a typical copper part begins with alkaline and ultrasonic cleaning followed by sulfuric activation, copper strike, and nickel plate. All wet operations are conducted manually using basket, barrel, rack, or wire process techniques. Wastewater is generated from the various spent process solutions and associated rinses. July 1 —December 31,2016 On August 30, September 23, September 27, October 21, and October 25,2016, Electrolurgy had major cadmium violations. OCSD conducted compliance inspections on November 2 and December 8,2016. OCSD will pursue escalated enforcement in the next reporting period. Electron Plating III Inc.(Permit No. 1-0213361 Electron Plating III Inc. (Electron Plating) takes in finished metal parts from various customers and surface finishes them with chromate-based chemfilming, dye coloring, zinc plating, and aluminum anodizing. The parts come primarily from the automotive, home improvement (bathroom fixtures), and construction industries. Alkaline and acidic pre-cleaners are used, along with dragout tanks after most process solutions, followed with running rinses. A standard continuous hydroxide-based pretreatment system is used for heavy metals removal from the wastewater, along with a hexavalent chrome reduction module with automated pH and ORP controls. A large lamella-type clarifier is used for solids settling, and a filter press is used for solids dewatering. In December 2015, Electron Plating had a minor chromium mass emission rate violation. In January 2016, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and resampling. Electron Plating was not able to identity any specific upset or spill on the day of the violation. OCSD cautioned the company that higher flow days would likely lead to further violations. Also, OCSD suggested that if business, and resulting flow, is on the rise, Electron Plating should submit updated flow information for adjustment to their permit flowbase,which is used in calculating mass limits. July 1 —December 31, 2016 Electron Plating had no further violations during this reporting period. No further enforcement is necessary. Energy Development Corp. (Permit No. 1-111019) Energy Development Corp. (Energy) extracts and produces crude oil from multiple oil wells. Crude oil is separated from brine via gravity in a large wash tank, with the brine wastewater directed to a three-stage, above-ground clarifier followed by ozone treatment prior to discharge to the sewer. In June 2015, Energy had a total toxic organics violation. Subsequent sampling by Energy and OCSD showed compliance. July 1. 2016—December 31, 2016 Permit No. 11-1-019 was terminated effective July 7, 2016 due to Energy selling its interest in the oil wells and discontinuing operations. Therefore, no further enforcement is necessary. FMH Aerospace Corp DBA FMH Corporation (Permit No. 57-1-331) FMH Aerospace Corp is a manufacturer of complex fabricated components including expansion and flexible joints,formed and welded metal bellows, high pressure(braided) gas or fluid transfer lines, and pressurized ducts for aerospace, commercial, industrial, military/defense, and transportation applications. Many of the 2-7 fabricated parts require extensive production tooling, therefore, a large portion of the facility is dedicated to general machine shop operations. Wastewater is generated primarily from the rinses following the surface cleaning and finishing operations performed on the metal parts during the various manufacturing stages, contact cooling for seam (resistance) welding, and secondarily by hydrostatic testing and fluorescent penetrant inspection conducted on the assemblies. Pretreatment consists solely of pH adjustment. July 1 —December 31, 2016 On July 21,2016, FMH had major silver and pH violations. On October 27,2016, FMH had another major silver violation. OCSD will pursue enforcement in the next reporting period. Gallade Chemical. Inc. (Permit No. 1-011257) Gallade Chemical, Inc. (Gallade) is a chemical distributor of virgin chemicals such as nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, and sodium hydroxide. The company repacks these chemicals from bulk containers into smaller containers and sold. These smaller containers are returned to Gallade for cleaning and reuse. Wastewater is generated from the rinsing of the chemical containers and associated equipment used in repackaging. Pretreatment consists of automated pH adjustment with mechanical mixer, pH controller, acid/base feed unit, settling tank, and final effluent pH monitoring with alarm. July 1. 2016—December 31, 2016 On October 26, 2016, Gallade had an instantaneous pH violation. OCSD immediately informed Gallade of the pH violation, after which Gallade took immediate action to prevent further release of low pH wastewater. On December 5,2016,Gallade submitted a formal Nol fixation of Off-Specification Discharge and Corrective Action Plan addressing the release of off-specification wastewater that led to the pH noncompliance and the steps Gallade would take to prevent future noncompliance. Gallade had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to monitor Gallade's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis. Green Clean Water&Waste Services(Permit No. 1-5218671 Green Clean Water&Waste Services(Green Clean) is a centralized waste treatment facility. Non- hazardous wastewater from utility vaults is delivered to the facility for treatment and discharge to the sewer. Green Clean utilizes an equalization/holding tank and a packaged treatment system consisting of a three- stage cartridge filter system followed by final polishing with a 200-lb canister of carbon and metals adsorption media. July i —December 31,2016 On November 22,2016,Green Clean had a minor titanium violation. OCSD will pursue enforcement in the next reporting period. Hi Tech Solder(Permit No. 1-5217901 Hi Tech Solder is a small job shop providing solder leveling service for printed circuit board manufacturers. Wastewater-generating processes include micro-etch, flux, solder leveling, floor/equipment cleaning, and associated static and running rinses. Hi Tech Solder operates a continuous pretreatment system (which 2-8 could also be used as batch treatment) consisting of chemical precipitation, coagulation/Flocculation and clarification, sludge holding tank, and filter press. The only spent chemical is a mild micro-etch which is changed once a month and gets treated on-site at a rate of 1 gallon per day. July 1 —December 31, 2016 On September 30, 2016, Hi Tech Solder had a copper violation. OCSD issued a Notice of Violation on December 29,2016. OCSD will conduct a compliance inspection and resampling during the next quarter. Hixson Metal Finishing(Permit No. 1-061115) Hixson Metal Finishing is a large metal surface finishing shop. Various metallic parts from the aviation, automotive,and electronics industries are brought in for surface finishing with aluminum chemfilm and dyeing, cadmium,copper,and nickel electroplating,and stainless steel passivation,along with a multitude of chemical precleaning and surface activation processes. Wastewater is generated from the rinses used in the various surface finish processes, plus fume scrubber bleed. The wastewater treatment at Hixson consists of cyanide destruct and hexavalent chrome reduction followed by heavy metals precipitation using caustic for pH adjust and coagulant injection, then polymer/flocculation and lamella clarifier for solids settling and removal to a sludge thickening tank. Overflow from the clarifier is discharged to a sample box with sewer connection, while the sludge is dewatered with a filter press. Filtrate from the press is plumbed to the heavy metals precipitation module for further treatment. July 1 —December 31, 2016 On September 23,2016, Hixson had a chromium violation. OCSD issued a Notice of Violation for this sample on December 29, 2016. Subsequent self-monitoring and OCSD sampling showed compliance. OCSD will continue to monitor Hixson's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis. J&J Marine Acquisitions(Permit No. 1-S511521 J&J Marine Acquisitions is a large boat and yacht rehabilitation and storage center. Marine craft of all sizes are brought into the yard for various rehabilitation processes, including boat hull scraping and sanding,then repainting, along with interior remodeling and refurbishing. Wastewater generated at the yard consists of boat hull wash downs,which is collected in sumps then pumped to a storage tank before pretreatment. J&J employs filtration and electrocoagulation for treatment and reduction of heavy metals plus any residual oil& grease from the wash down wastewater. Treated wastewater is either collected in storage tanks for yard wash reuse and/or discharged directly into the sewer. July 1 —December 31, 2016 On September 7,2016, J&J had a copper violation. J&J informed OCSD that the sample may have been collected from inside the storage tank instead of at the designated sampling location. J&J also indicated that they had the storage tanks pumped out and cleaned soon afterwards as a corrective measure. Subsequent sampling by OCSD and J&J showed compliance. OCSD will continue to monitor J&J Marine's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis. Loni Graphics(Permit No. 1-0310491 Logi Graphics is a full service printed circuit board manufacturer. The manufacturing process starts with innerlayer fabrication using copper clad core material which is cut to size, coated with dryfilm etch resist then photoprinted, developed, and etched. The layers are inspected then processed through brown oxide and lamination to create the outerayer panel,then microdrilled and hole walls cleaned and coated with electroless copper before processing through outerlayer photo with etch resist application, photoprint and 2-9 develop, and copper/tin electroplating. After resist strip, the panels are copper etched then tin stripped before soldermask coating and legend screening. After coating,the panels may be hot air solder levelled and/or nickel/gold tip plating before final rout/fabrication and electrical testing/inspection followed by packaging and shipment to customers. Wastewater generated at Logi Graphics consists of rinsewater from the inner and outerlayer chemical processing, plus treatment of some spent process chemicals in a batch treatment system. Copper-bearing rinsewater flows are treated in a standard hydroxide/polymer flocculation pretreatment system, with a two- stage clarifier employed for solids settling followed by a sludge thickening tank. A fitter press is used to dewater solids from the thickening tank,with the filtrate returned to the beginning of the continuous pretreatment system. July 1 —December 31,2016 On September 28,2016, Logi Graphics had a minor copper violation. OCSD issued a Notice of Violation to Logi Graphics on December 31,2016. Subsequent sampling by OCSD showed compliance. OCSD will continue to monitor Logi Graphics'discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis. Marukome USA. Inc.(Permit No. 14-1-023) Marukome USA, Inc. (Marukome) processes and produces miso paste from cooked soybeans and rice. Marukome's pretreatment system consists of pH adjustment and clarification. Through the last several years, Marukome had chronic low-pH violations related to insufficient treatment of biologically decaying food waste passing through the facility's sample point. In December 2015, a revised permit was developed (issued as a renewed permit on January 1, 2016) to address the operational issues associated with Marukome's pH discharge non-compliance. Among the permit conditions required, Marukome must designate specific pretreatment system operators,operate the system at all times the facility is discharging, as well as record the pH via a data recorder during times of discharge. The facility is also required to perform daily operational checks and maintain associated logs, perform periodic equipment calibrations, and post the operation manual for staff reference. On May 25 and May 26, 2016, OCSD measured non-compliant pH values in Marukome's discharge. OCSD issued an Order to Cease Non- Compliant Discharges to Marukome on June 30,2016,which also directed Marukome to attend a compliance meeting on July 12, 2016. July 1 —December 31, 2016 A compliance meeting was held on July 12, 2016, during which Marukome agreed to fully comply with the permit limits and operate the facility in accordance with the recently added permit conditions to maintain operational control over the facility's discharge compliance. A sample collected on July 21, 2016 demonstrated the facility to be in compliance with the pH limits. However, from September 2016 through October 2016, Marukome had seven pH violations ranging from 4.58 to 5.97. Marukome installed additional pretreatment equipment in November 2016 to mitigate the pH noncompliance issues. OCSD issued seven Notices of Violation in December 2016 and required Marukome to attend another compliance meeting on December 22, 2016, which was later rescheduled for the following month. OCSD will continue escalated enforcement in the next reporting period. Paramount Chrome Plating. Inc.(Permit No. 1-511415) Paramount Chrome Plating, Inc. (Paramount Chrome) performs chrome plating on automotive wheels.The process consists of stripping existing coatings, alkaline cleaning, acid activation, acid copper plating, semi- bright and bright nickel plating, and chrome plating,with a zincate process for plating on aluminum and a nickel strike for stainless steel. Wastewater is generated from the rinses associated with these processes. 2-10 Paramount Chrome operates a continuous pretreatment system consisting of equalization,two-stage cyanide destruction,chrome reduction, hydroxide precipitation, coagulation/flocculation, clarification, and sludge dewatering with a filter press. Paramount Chrome uses a batch treatment system for treatment of spent solutions. July 1 —December 31,2016 On August 12,2016, Paramount Chrome had major instantaneous chromium, copper, nickel,and zinc violations. OCSD issued an Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges to Paramount Chrome on August 18,2016. OCSD also held a compliance meeting with Paramount Chrome on September 14,2016. On September 20, 2016, OCSD sent Paramount Chrome a Compliance Meeting Outcome letter reiterating the corrective measures that Paramount Chrome was directed to implement to return to long-term compliance. On September 27,2016, Paramount Chrome had another chromium violation. On December 27, 2016, Paramount Chrome had further chromium, copper, nickel, and zinc violations. OCSD will issue a Second Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges to Paramount Chrome and conduct a compliance inspection and resampling in the next quarter. Platinum Surface Coatina.Inc. (Permit No.1-6218621 Platinum Surface Coating Inc. (Platinum Surface)is ajob-shop plating shop specializing in automotive wheels and centers. Wastewater generating operations include alkaline and acidic precleaning, surface activation, surface adhesion promotion,and rinse waters from the nickel strike,copper plating and chrome electroplating processes. Platinum Surface employs a batch treatment system consisting of pH adjustment, coagulation injection, chrome reduction, cyanide destruction, and sludge filtration/dewatering with a filter press. In 2015, Platinum Surface had total toxic organics violations (mainly chloroform) from the use of bleach in Platinum Surface's cyanide destruct pretreatment process. Platinum Surface had been overdosing with bleach to ensure complete cyanide treatment. After receipt of a Notice of Violation from OCSD, Platinum Surface began testing volumes of bleach in the cyanide destruct and batch treatment process. Platinum also started sampling and analyzing each batch prior to discharge to the sewer. In January 2016, Platinum Surface had a cyanide violation. OCSD advised Platinum Surface to increase the hold time for bleach treatment and cyanide destruct in their batch treatment tank from one to two or more hours. Platinum Surface's own analysis of the batch (tested by an outside laboratory)indicated compliance, at non-detect level. Subsequent sampling by OCSD and Platinum Surface showed compliance as well. July 1 —December 31, 2016 Platinum Surface had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to monitor Platinum Surface's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis. RBC Transport Dynamics Corp.(Permit No. 1-011013) RBC Transport Dynamics Corp. (RBC) is a captive metal finishing facility that manufactures journal and spherical bearings,rod ends,and custom engineered assemblies for aerospace,automotive,and commercial applications. RBC's wet processes include acid deoxidizer, alkaline cleaner, alodine, aluminum cleaner, anodize stripper, black oxide, black oxide activator, cadmium plate,cadmium plate stripper,chromate type 1, chromate type 2, degreaser, dichromate seal, hard anodize, hydrochloric dip, nickel strike, nitrictchromic passivation, sulfuric anodize, vibratory debur #1, vibratory debur #2, and associated rinsing. The effluent discharge at RBC is only from the vibratory deburring operation. All rinse water in the anodizing and plating processes and air scrubber bleed streams are treated using an evaporation unit and not discharged to the sewer. All spent chemicals are wastehauled offsite. The ion exchange column that treats cadmium rinse water is sent back to the manufacturer for regeneration. Wastewater from the vibratory deburring operations 2-11 generate the only source of wastewater discharged to the sewer at RBC. The company has installed filtration units in the deburring room to try and remove solids from the wastewater before discharge to the sewer. During 2015, RBC had two chromium violations, which were attributed to operator error. Subsequent sampling during the first half of 2016 showed compliance. July 1 —December 31, 2016 On December 7, 2016, RBC had further chromium and nickel and zinc violations. OCSD will pursue enforcement in the next reporting period. Safran Electronics& Defense.Avionics USA LLC(15713041 Safran Electronics& Defense, Avionics USA LLC(Safran—name changed from Sagem Avionics) is a medium size facility specializing in fabrication of pushbutton switches, indicators, and panel displays for aerospace, commercial aviation, and military/defense applications. The wet processes for surface treatment and cleaning/deburring include: vibratory deburring, caustic etch surface treatment line, legend marking of finished housings are screen painted and/or applied with a laser burner, soldering or wave soldering, ultrasonic cleaner(plastic parts), and an aqueous flux removal system with some miscellaneous cleanup as well. Wastewater drains through a two-pipe manifold into a two-stage above-ground clarifier located outside the building. Safran presently pumps out both chambers of the clarifier every two to three weeks. July 1 —December 31, 2016 On September 1 and December 15, 2016,Safran had silver violations. OCSD will pursue enforcement in the next reporting period. Sanmina Corporation (Redhill)(Permit No. 1-061009) Sanmina Corporation (Redhill) (Sanmina) is a full service printed circuit board manufacturer producing rigid and flexible multi-layer boards from copper-clad and pre-preg materials. Wet processes performed at the facility include: various acid & alkaline cleaning steps, oxide coating, deburring, catalyst, conditioner, electroless copper plating, copper plating, Entek (proprietary) coating, microetching, activation, permanganate, neutralization, scrubbing,tin plating,glass etch,&wet air scrubbing along with all appropriate rinses. Pretreatment operations include flow equalization, continuous pH adjustment, Memtek microfiltration, ion exchange, hydroxide precipitation, clarification, and sludge dewatering with a filter press. July 1 —December 31, 2016 On October 5, 2016, Sanmina had a major copper violation. OCSD will pursue enforcement in the next reporting period. Toyota Racino Development(Permit No. 1-071059) Toyota Racing Development(TRD)manufactures new and rebuilt high-performance engines used in various motorsports. Wet operations include dye penetrant rinse from parts inspection processes, parts washer rinse and aqueous parts cleaner from teardown operation, condensate from compressors, engine cooling water from testing, and miscellaneous floor waste. Pretreatment at TRD includes clarification followed by two particle filter units, one clay filter bed, and two granular activated carbon beds. 2-12 In November 2015, TRD had an oil and grease violation. In January 2016, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection, during which TRD reported that they had their clarifier pumped out, filter media replaced, and sample point cleaned out to remove any residual oil & grease in their pretreatment system. Subsequent sampling showed compliance. July 1 —December 31, 2016 TRD had no further violations during this reporting period. No further enforcement is necessary. Ultra-Pure Metal Finishina. Inc.(Permit No. 1-021703) Ultra-Pure Metal Finishing is a metal finishing job shop. Customer-supplied parts made of aluminum and steel are brought in for anodize or chemfilm plus colored dyes for aluminum parts,and acid preclean and zinc plate for steel parts. Several preclean and surface activation tanks are employed as well. Wastewater generated consists of the rinsewater following the chemical process tanks,and batch treatment of some spent process chemicals. Wastewater treatment at Ultra-Pure consists of hexavalent chrome reduction, heavy metals reduction and precipitation using caustic for pH adjust along with coagulant addition, followed by polymer/flocculation for metals precipitation before final clarification and discharge of the effluent to a sample box(sewer connection. Solids from the clarifier are pumped to a sludge thickening tank,where a filter press is utilized to dewater solids, and the filtrate returned to the beginning of the pretreatment system. July 1 —December 31,2016 On August 25,2016,Ultra-Pure had a zinc violation. Subsequent sampling by Ultra-Pure and OCSD showed compliance. OCSD will continue to monitor Ultra-Pure's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis. United Pharma.LLC(Permit No. 1531418) United Pharma, LLC(UP) manufactures various soft gelatin nutritional supplement capsules from customer- supplied bulk liquids. Products are not pharmaceutically active. Wastewater is generated from the cleaning and sterilization operations performed on mixing (of gelatin for capsules)and dosing equipment. Pretreatment is limited to an underground clarifier. July 1 —December 31, 2016 Following a pH violation associated with a minor spill resulting from a line blockage, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection on August 2, 2016. During the inspection, it was noted that the spill had been contained,the line was cleared,and the clarifier was operating normally. Also, UP had installed a level control in the clarifier to prevent recurrence of this problem. UP had no further pH violations during this reporting period. No further enforcement is necessary. Viasytems Technologies Corporation. LLC(Permit No. 1521859) Viasystems North America, Inc. (Viasystems)is a large scale, full-service printed circuit board shop. Wastewater is generated from the processing of copper laminates into printed circuit boards. Wet processes performed include: copper plating, electroless copper plating, nickel/gold plating, solder mask, alkaline cleaning, acid cleaning, scrubbing, developing, resist stripping, tin stripping, etching, screen cleaning, oxide coating, and miscellaneous cleanup(mopwater. Rinse schemes practiced at the facility include significant use of static rinses in addition to running rinses. Viasystems operates a confinuous pretreatment system,which includes pH adjustment and multiple ion exchange resin beds,with much of the 2-13 effluent reused. Batch treatment(pH adjustment, Flocculation, clarification followed by sludge dewatering with a filter press) is also performed on spent solutions including ion exchange backflush. Concentrated wastestreams(etchant, spent plating solutions)are wastehauled offsite. July 1 —December 31, 2016 On November 3, 2016, Viasystems had a copper violation. OCSD will pursue enforcement in the next reporting period. 2-14 chapter 3 SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY (SAWPA) (As submitted by SAWPA) 3.0 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) SAWPA was formed in 1968 to develop a long-range plan for managing, preserving, and protecting the quality of water supplies in the Santa Ana Basin. SAWPA is a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) consisting of five member agencies: Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA), Orange County Water District (OCWD), San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (Valley District), and Western Municipal Water District (WMWD). SAWPA's program in water quality management is integrated with those of other local, state, and federal agencies. The Inland Empire Brine Line (Brine Line) is a pipeline designed to carry saline wastewater from the Upper Basin to the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)for disposal, after treatment, into the Pacific Ocean. This wastewater consists of a mixture of desaher brine and saline wastewater from Industrial Users (IUs), but also some temporary domestic discharges. The wastewater is treated by OCSD to comply with environmental standards before discharge to the ocean outfall. The rapacity of the Brine Line available to SAWPA is 30 MG per day (MGD). The average daily discharge was 11.41 MGD for this reporting period. 3.1 Brine Line System Pretreatment Program Overview SAWPA has a wastewater discharge ordinance applicable to the Brine Line. It is essentially, with some appropriate modifications, substantially similar to OCSD's Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance. In addition, a Memorandum of Understanding is in place to delineate pretreatment permitting, monitoring, enforcement, and reporting responsibilities between SAWPA and OCSD. SAWPA has entered into a Multijurisdictional Pretreatment Agreement (Agreement) with Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA), Jurupa Community Services District(JCSD), San Bernardino Municipal Water Department(SBMWD), San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (Valley District), Western Municipal Water District (WMWD), and Yucaipa Valley Water District(YVWD). This Agreement delineates the pretreatment responsibilities between SAWPA and the agencies to carry out and enforce a pretreatment program to control discharges from We located in their service areas. SAWPA owns and operates the Brine Line above the Orange County line and has purchased 17 MGD of treatment and disposal capacity rights at OCSD's treatment facilities. As of December 31, 2016, there are thirty-nine (39) direct connections and twelve (12) emergency connections, such as for the Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority South Regional Pumping Station (WRCRWA SRP), and the City of Corona's Water Reclamation Facility No. 1) and four Brine Line Collection Stations (Collection Stations) discharging to the Brine Line. The four (4) Collection Stations are located in and operated by the following agencies: EMWD, IEUA, San Bernardino Municipal Water Department (SBMWD) on behalf of Valley District, and the City of Corona on behalf of WMWD. Twenty-four (24) indirect discharge Permittees located within the SAWPA service area discharge to the Collection Stations. SAWPA has the permitting responsibilities for all Liquid Waste Haulers(LWH)that use the four(4) Collection Stations. The SAWPA LWH permits assign a primary collection station and alternate collection station should the primary collection station become unavailable due to repairs or closure. During the reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), SAWPA continued implementation of numerous program documents and worked to improve the operation and implementation of the Pretreatment Program. On October 15, 2013, the SAWPA Commission adopted a revised Ordinance(Ordinance Establishing Regulations for the Use of the Inland Empire Brine Line); Program Policies and an Enforcement Response Plan. The member/contract agencies proceeded with adoption of the revised documents, as applicable. A multijudsdictional pretreatment agreement between SAWPA and the member/contract agencies defines the roles and responsibilities of SAWPA and the Agencies. SAWPA and the member and contract agencies use a procedures document for uniform and consistent implementation of the Pretreatment 3-1 Program. Updates to the permit templates for CIUs, SIUs, IUs, and LWHs are in development. A Data Management System(iPACS)continued to be used. Reporting below is individually presented for each SAWPA Pretreatment Program member/contract agency. 3.2 SAWPA Pretreatment Program 3.2.1 Eastern Municipal Water District(EMWD) Description of EMWD EMWD headquarters are located in Perris, CA and serves the eastern portion of the watershed in Riverside County, as well as portions of the Santa Margarita Watershed not connected to the Brine Line. In the face of declining groundwater levels and continuing droughts, EMWD was formed in 1950 to secure additional water for a lightly populated area of western Riverside County. EMWD joined the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California a year later to augment its local supplies with recently available imported water. The District also provides sewer service throughout its area. EMWD is a Municipal Water District responsible for the implementation of certain pretreatment program activities for non-EMWD owned industries connected (Direct Dischargers) to EMWD's Non-Reclaimable Waste Line (NWL) which discharges to the Brine Line at Reach V. The one (1) Direct Discharger to EMWD's NWL is the Inland Empire Energy Center. EMWD jointly permits with SAWPA one (1) industrial user to haul wastewater to the SAWPA-approved Collection Station located in EMWD's service area at 29541 Murrieta Road, Menifee, California. Existing Permits—Direct • Inland Empire Energy Center(Permit No. D1036-2) 26226 Antelope Road, Menifee, CA 92585 The Inland Empire Energy Center (IEEC) began operation in October 2007. The IEEC has a maximum discharge of 1.2 MGD, at a maximum Bow of 833 gallons per minute (gpm). The IEEC is a categorical industry and is regulated under 40 CFR 423.17 (PSNS), Steam Electric Power Generation Point Source Category. The facility was designed to generate and supply electricity to the electric power grid. Wastewater is generated from cooling tower blow-down that includes flow from boiler blow-down, area floor drains, oil/water separator, microfiltration backwash, heat recovery steam generation blow-down; and microfikration clean in place activities. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016). the total flow to the Brine Line was 18.43 MG. Existing Permits—Indirect • Infineon Technologies Americas Corporation (Permit No. I1039-21 41915 Business Park Drive,Temecula, CA 92590 Infineon Technologies Americas Corporation (formerly International Rectifier) is a categorical industry and is regulated under 40 CFR 469 Electrical and Electrical Components Point Source Category, Subpart A, Semiconductor Category, PSNS. International Rectifier takes precut silicon wafers and makes semiconductor computer chips, which are used for computer, peripheral, automotive, and cellular telephone 3-2 applications. Acid etching and solvent etching of the wafers are performed at this location. The acid etching includes the use of hydrofluoric, sulfuric, hydrochloric, nitric, and phosphoric acid. The solvent etching includes the use of xylene and an ethyl lactate base solvent. The wastewater generated from the acid etching process is neutralized and discharged to two 35,000-gallon storage tanks and/or a 39,000-gallon storage tank. The contents of the storage tanks are hauled off site to the EMWD Collection Station for disposal. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total flow to the Brine Line was 10.712 MG. New Permits-Direct None New Permits—Indirect None Closed Permits—Direct None Closed Permits—Indirect None Enforcement Action None 3-3 3.2.2 Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA) Description of IEUA IEUA, originally named the Chino Basin Municipal Water District(CBMWD), was formed in 1950 to supply supplemental water to the region. Since its formation, IEUA has expanded its areas of responsibility from a supplemental water supplier to a regional wastewater treatment agency with domestic and industrial disposal systems and energy recovery/production facilities. In addition, IEUA has become a recycled water purveyor, bio-solidstfertilizer treatment provider, and continues as a leader in salt management for the purpose of protecting the region's vital groundwater supplies. The IEUA strives to enhance the quality of life in the Inland Empire by providing optimum water resources management for the area's customers while promoting conservation and environmental protection. The IEUA covers 242 square miles, distributes imported water, provides industriaVmunicipal wastewater collection and treatment services, and other related utility services to more than 850,000 people. IEUA's service area includes the Cities of Chino, Chino Hills, Fontana, Montclair, Ontario and Upland, as well as the Cucamonga Valley Water District and the Monte Vista Water District. IEUA is a Municipal Water District responsible for the implementation of certain pretreatment program activities for the industries located within IEUA's service area. There are a total of seven (7) permits jointly issued by SAWPA and IEUA to direct dischargers. As of this report SAWPA and IEUA jointly permit five (5) industrial users to have their wastewater hauled to the SAWPAapproved Collection Station located in IEUA's service area at 16400 El Prado Road, Chino, California. Existing Permits—Direct • California Institution for Men(Permit No.D1006-2) 14901 Central Avenue, Chino.CA 91710 California Institution far Men (CIM) is a state correctional facility. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. The wastewater effluent to the Brine Line is generated from a de-nitrification plant which treats groundwater from on-site wells for potable use at CIM and the California Institution for Women. This facility is located in IEUA's service area and is inspected by IEUA. The CIM domestic sewage flows from the Men's Central facility discharges to an on-site treatment plant. The East facility discharges its domestic sewage flows into the City of Chino, Regional Sewer System. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the discharge to the Brine Line was 15.109 MG. 3-4 • California Institution for Women (Permit No.D1007.21 16756 Chino-Corona Road,Corona.CA 92880 California Institution for Women (CIW) is a state correctional facility. This facility is classed as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. The wastewater effluent to the Brine Line is generated from water softener regeneration backwash, boiler blow- down, vehicle washing, and print shop, medical and dental clinic, kitchen, and various domestic sewer connections throughout the facility. This facility is located in IEUA's service area and is inspected by IEUA. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the discharge to the Brine Line was 58.55 MG. • Chino Development Corporation(Permit No.D1011-21 15000 Pine Avenue. Chino, CA 91708 The Chino Development Corp. (CDC) developed a residential neighborhood in the City of Chino known as the Preserve. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. CDC is currently permitted to discharge domestic wastewater to the Brine Line until the City of Chino completes the construction of a sewer lift station. This station will convey flows to IEUA's Regional Water Recycling Plant No. 5 (RP-5). The anticipated completion date of the lift station is delayed and a request to extend the temporary discharge to March 2020 is anticipated. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the discharge to the Brine Line was 80.57 MG. • Green River Golf Club(Permit No.1311032-2) 5215 Green River Road.Corona,CA 92880 Green River Golf Club is a public golf course facility. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. Discharge is from a combination of restrooms/showers and food services. A sand/oil separator at the golf cart wash area discharges onto a portion of the golf course as an irrigation source. Green River Golf Club has a grease interceptor outside the cafeteria to prevent oil and grease from entering the Brine Line. The Green River Golf Club permit utilizes 100% of the incoming water meter flow to determine the discharge flow. The incoming water meter is located outside of the cafeteria on the west side of the Clubhouse. During this reporting period(July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total flow to the Brine Line was 0.7305 MG. • Mission Linen Supply (Permit No.D1057-2) 5400 Alton Street, Chino, CA 91710 Mission Linen Supply is an industrial laundry. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. Mission Linen Supply launders hotel linens, uniforms, shop towels, floor mats, table cloths, and other restaurant linens. Washroom chemicals used in the process are alkalis, surfactants, bleach and starch. Mission Linen Supply's wastewater effluent to the Brine Line is generated from laundry process water, softener regeneration wastewater, boiler blow-down,filter press filtrate, and wastewater from the truck sanitizing process. The pretreatment system at Mission Linen Supply includes oil/water separation, floatable and settleable solids separation, shaker screens, filter press, pH adjustment, and equalization tanks. During this reporting period July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016). the total flow to the Brine Line was 33.908 MG. 3-5 • OLS Eneray-Chino(Permit No.D1059-2.11 5601 Eucalyptus Avenue, Chino,CA 91708 OLS Energy — Chino (OLS) is a cogeneration facility located within the CIM site. OLS generates electricity and steam for CIM and sells excess electricity to Southern California Edison Company. OLS is a categorical industry and is regulated under 40 CFR 423.17 (PSNS). The discharge to the Brine Line is generated from demineralization, boiler blow- down, cooling tower blow-down, water treatment evaporator blow-down, laboratory and sampling streams, floor drains, and cooling tower basin cleaning wastes. These wastewater streams (with the exception of the cooling tower blow-down and basin cleaning wastes,which are monitored separately)are combined and passed through an oil separator, which serves as a clarifier, prior to flowing to a sump and then to the Brine Line. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016),the total flow to the Brine Line was 9.921 MG. • Repet. Inc. (Perk No. D1069-21 14207 Monte Vista Avenue,Chino,CA 91710 Repet, Inc. (Repet) is a plastic recycler which processes used plastic bottles into clean plastic flakes. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. Repel commenced discharge to the Brine Line in November 2012. Wastewater is generated from the shredding, grinding, and cleaning of polyethylene terephthalate(PET) plastic bottles into flakes. During this reporting period(July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total flow to the Brine Line was 1.882 MG. Existing Permits-Indirect • C.C. Graber Company(Permit No. 11005-2) 315 E.4' Street, Ontario, CA 91764 C.C. Greber Company (Graber) is an olive canning plant. Graber is classified as a Categorical Industrial User(CIU)as its production process is regulated under 40 CFR Part 407 — Canned & Preserved Fruits & Vegetables Processing Point Source Category (Subpart F — Canned and Preserved Fruits Subcategory). Graber grades the olives and then cures and processes them. Wastewater is generated from reverse osmosis (RO) concentrate and boiler blow-down. Graber's work is seasonal from around October through early January. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total flow discharged to the Brine Line was 0.1440 MG. • Eastside Water Treatment Plant(Perk No. 11024-2) 7537 Schaefer Avenue. Ontario, CA 91761 Eastside Water Treatment Plant generates wastewater from the regeneration of ion- exchange vessels used for the removal of nitrate in groundwater for potable water reuse. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total flow to the Brine Line was 0.618 MG. • Niaaara Bottlina.LLC(Permit No. 11114-1) 1401 North Alder Way,Rialto, CA 92376 3-6 Niagara Bottling, LLC (Niagara) is classified as an industrial user based on the type of wastewater generated and the volume of wastewater discharged to the Brine Line. Niagara manufactures purified drinking water. Municipal potable water is purified by advanced filtration and reverse osmosis before being sanitized with ozone. Concentrated reverse osmosis reject water, cooling tower blowdown, and process water from Clean-in- Place procedures are discharged to the onsite brine storage tank. The permittee discharges to both the SBMWD and IEUA Collection Stations as their primary stations. Discharge to SBMWD is Monday through Friday and to IEUA on weekends and holidays when the SBMWD Collection Station is closed. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016),the total flow to the Brine Line was 0.259 MG. • San Antonio Regional Hospital(Permit No. 11096-1.11 999 San Bernardino Road. Upland.CA 91786 San Antonio Regional Hospital permit became effective on September 22, 2014. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. San Antonio Regional Hospital is a community hospital established in Upland, CA in 1924. SACH generates brine wastewater from an on-site water softening system that softens potable water for use in the hospital operations. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total flow discharged to the Brine Line was.0283 MG. • ShawCor Pipe Protection. LLC(Permit No.11077-2) 14000 San Bernardino Avenue, Southwest Gate No.6.Fontana, CA 92335 ShawCor Pipe Protection, LLC (ShawCor) is a categorical industry and is regulated under 40 CFR, Part 433.17. ShawCor coats pre-manufactured steel pipe. Three coating operations are performed on-site: Pritec®, mulfilayer, and fusion bond/powder coating. Acid wastewater is generated from the mulblayer and fusion bond/powder coating processes. The acid wastewater is stored in a tank and neutralized prior to being hauled to the Brine Line Collection Station. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016), the total flow discharged to the Brine Line was .0145 MG. New Permits-Direct None New Permits—Indirect None Closed Permits—Direct None Closed Permits—Indirect • Chemicals Inc. (Permit No. 11097-1.1) Permit Voided 911312016 13560 Colombard Court, Fontana, CA 92337 Chemicals Inc. permit became effective on October 3, 2014. This facility is classified as 3-7 an Industrial User and therefore Loral Limits apply. Chemicals Inc. is a chemicals manufacturer that blends liquid water treatment additives for the protection of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration systems, boilers, and cooling tower systems from corrosion, scaling, and fouling. Chemicals Inc. generates brine wastewater from an on-site water softening system used for softening potable water for use in the chemical blending operations. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016) there was no discharge to the Brine Line. Enforcement Action None 3.2.3 Jurupa Community Services District(JCSDI Description of JCSD Founded in 1956, the JCSD is a public agency known as a Special District, governed by a 5-member, elected, Board of Directors. JCSD is responsible for providing water, sewer, and street lights for over 120,000 people, and for maintaining more than 160 acres of parks and over 25 miles of frontage landscape in the City of Jurupa Valley and the City of Eastvale, a 48-square-mile region of western Riverside County. In the early 1990s, residential development was occurring within the JCSD service area, but JCSD lacked wastewater treatment capacity. WMWD and JCSD entered into a series of agreements that transferred capacity in the Brine Line from WMWD to JCSD. This capacity would be used for domestic wastes until treatment capacity was available in the Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Plant (WRCRWRP). The WRCRWRP was completed in the late 1990s and JCSD began transferring Flows of domestic wastewater from the Brine Line into the WRCRWRP. JCSD has purchased additional capacity in the current WRCRWRP expansion project. JCSD permits facilities connected to the Etiwanda and Wineville lines to the Brine Line. The permitted facilities are described below. JCSD is a public agency responsible for the implementation of certain pretreatment program activities for the industries connected to the Brine Line via JCSD's sewer collection system within its service area (Brine Line Reach IV-D). SAWPA and JCSD jointly permit six (6) Direct Dischargers. JCSD also conveys wastewater from three (3) water treatment plants permitted by SAWPA to the Brine Line. JCSD's sewer collection system includes some domestic wastewater from commercial and industrial facilities. Existina Permits -Direct • ADESA Los Anaeles(Permit No. D1001-1) 11625 Nino Way,Juruoa Valley,CA 91762 ADESA Los Angeles is an automobile reconditioning and wholesale auction facility. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. The wastewater effluent to the Brine Line is generated from car washing operations, maintenance shop, wet sanding, and cafeteria wastes. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the discharge to the Brine Line via the JCSD Wineville Avenue connection was 1.2695 MG. • Del Real Foods, LLC (Permit No. D1021-2) 11041 Inland Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 91752 3-8 Del Real Foods, LLC is in the business of preparing tamales, salsas, papusas, beef, pork, chicken, rice, and beans for sale as ready-to-eat meals. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. A 2,000 gallon grease interceptor serves the kettle room, raw meat processing area, deep fryers, equipment wash-down room, and refrigerator condensers. A 1,000 gallon grease interceptor serves the cooked meat and packaging areas, air compressor condensate, contact cooling water, and refrigerator condensers. After passing through the interceptors, the waste flows to a flow equalization tank and then to a dissolved air flotation (DAF) system to remove oil and grease. Wastewater generated in the expansion (salsa, rice and bean preparation area) is discharged through a 3,000 gallon grease interceptor prior to connecting to the DAF system. Discharges from the cooling tower, emergency ammonia dump, boiler, and air compressors pass through a 500 gallon clarifier prior to connecting to the process wastewater sampling manhole. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016) the discharge to the Brine Line via the JCSD Etiwanda connection was 27.425 MG. • Magnolia Foods (Permit No.01053-2) 11058 Philadelphia Avenue,Junius Valley,CA 91752 Magnolia Foods is a food manufacturing facility for the following: com and flour tortillas, corn sopes, sheet cakes and com and flour chip frying. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. Dry cem or wheat flour is mixed with water to make dough. Dough passes through a press and tortilla oven. Corn dough passes through a form for sopes. Wheat flour is mixed with water for cake mix and poured in to boxes for baking. Corn and flour tortillas are cut and sent to the fryer for chip making. The wastewater effluent is from facility cleaning, and utensil and equipment sanitation. The process wastewater flows through a 1,500 gallon clarifier with a sampling manhole. This facility is connected to the JCSD Etiwanda connection. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the discharge to the Brine Line was 1.57 MG. • Metal Container Corporation(Permit No.D1066-2) 10980 Inland Avenue.Juruoa Valley. CA 91752 Metal Container is an aluminum can manufacturer. The wastewater effluent to the Brine Line is generated from can washer blow-down, oil splitter supernatant, water conditioning brines, cooling tower blow-down, and boiler blow-down. Metal Container Corporation is a categorical industrial user and is classified as a Coil Coating, Canmaking subcategory, New Source under 40 CFR 465.45. The process waste stream includes the following pretreatment system and processes to remove regulated pollutants prior to discharge to the Brine Line: Wastewater treatment includes unaided oil skimming, flow equalization, cationic polymer coagulation, low-pH chemical emulsion breaking and secondary oil skimming. Treatment then involves lime addition, which precipitates not only metal hydroxides but also fluoride and phosphate under alkaline conditions, flowed by anionic polymer flocculation and settling. Settled solids are dewatered through a sludge thickener and filter press. The sludge thickener decant and filter press filtrate are returned to the filtrate sump while the sludge is hauled offsite for disposal. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016) the discharge to the Brine Line via the JCSD Etiwanda connection was 42.1626 MG. Wakunaga of America Co..Ltd.Mira Loma Plant 91 (Permit No. D1084-2) 3-9 11216 Philadelphia Avenue,Jurupa Valley,CA 91752 Wakunaga of America is a nutraoeutical manufacturer. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Loral Limits apply. The wastewater effluent to the Brine Line is generated from large blending and manufacturing equipment wash-downs, an on-site laundry facility, and floor cleaning equipment which discharge to a 1,000 gallon clarifier prior to connecting to the Brine Line. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the discharge to the Brine Line, via the JCSD Etiwanda Avenue connection was 0.1681 MG. • Wakunaga of America Co.. Ltd. Mira Loma Plant#2(Permit No. D1085-11 11093 Venture Drive.Jurupa Valley, CA 91752 Wakunaga of America is a garlic powder manufacturer. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. The wastewater effluent to the Brine Line is generated from garlic wash waste, floor and equipment cleaning, vacuum extraction of garlic extract,and water conditioning brines. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the discharge to the Brine Line, via the JCSD Etiwanda Avenue connection was 0.4479 MG. Existina Permits-Indirect None New Permits - Direct None New Permits-Indirect None Closed Permits - Direct None Closed Permits -Indirect None Enforcement Action • Del Real Foods. LLC(Permit No. D1021-2) 11041 Inland Avenue,Jurupa Valley,CA 91752 A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action was issued To Del Real Foods, LLC (Del Real) by SAWPA on July 14, 2016 for a bypass in the pretreatment wet well and for exceedance of their Brine Line purchased capacity. The Order for Corrective Action (OCA) required Del Real to submit a corrective action plan regarding the bypass and to apply for additional Brine Line capacity. Del Real repaired and made improvements to the existing alarm system to the wet well, which was verified by SAWPA during inspection. Del Real also installed and repaired screens for the production room drains. Del Real submitted a request for additional Brine Line capacity and a Water Balance Report which detailed water consumption and wastewater discharged to the Brine Line. Del Real agreed to purchase an additional 163,000 gallons of Brine Line capacity and submitted the 3-10 Water Balance Report. SAWPA shall determine Del Real's compliance status following receipt of a new wastewater discharge permit application and issuance of a revised wastewater discharge permit. 3.2.4 San Bernardino Municipal Water Department(SBMWD) Description of SBMWD On February 10, 2004, Valley District and SBMWD entered into a Collection Station Operating Agreement. Valley District is one of the member agencies of SAWPA and owns capacity rights for discharges to the Brine Line. SBMWD owns and operates the Chandler Water Reclamation Plant (WRP), which includes discharges to the Santa Ana River, as well as to the Brine Line. SBMWD owns the Collection Station at its WRP and accepts brine wastewater delivered by truck. The Collection Station is connected directly to the Brine Line. SBMWD is authorized under the Operating Agreement, as an agent of Valley District, to operate the Collection Station. This Collection Station serves as the primary brine disposal location for facilities in Valley District's service area. The industries which have their wastewater normally hauled to the SBMWD Collection Station are permitted and inspected by SBMWD in accordance with the Operating Agreement between Valley District and SBMWD. SBMWD is responsible for supporting the implementation of the SAWPA Pretreatment Program for industries located within SBMWD's service area. SAWPA and SBMWD jointly permit ten (9) indirect industrial users that haul wastewater to the collection station. Existing Permits -Direct None Existing Permits—Indirect Angelica Textile Services(Permit No. 11003-2.11 925 South 8' Street,Colton,CA 92324 Angelica Textile Services is an industrial laundry engaged in supplying on a rental or contract basis, work uniforms, towels, and linens. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. A self- regenerating soft water system is used to soften the potable water supply prior to the washing process. The resin contained in the soft water tank is used to remove the calcium and magnesium ions (hardness) from the potable water supply. Spent resin is recharged with a sweet brine solution, containing concentrated sodium. Approximately 35,600 gallons per month of spent brine solution is discharged to an on-site brine storage tank. The spent brine solution is hauled to a Brine Line Collection Station. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total flow discharged to the Brine Line was 0.2384 MG. • City of Riverside John W. North Treatment Plant(Permit No. 11014.1.1) 22001 Grand Terrace Road,Grand Terrace, CA 92313 The City of Riverside John W. North Treatment Plant produces drinking water using a submerged membrane process. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. Membranes are cleaned with low pH or highly chlorinated water. Cleaning wastewater is pumped to a 3,000 gallon tank where it is neutralized to a pH of 7.0, and any residual chlorine is removed using sodium hypochlonte, phosphoric 3-11 acid and citric acid. The spent brine solution is hauled to the Brine Line Collection Station. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), there was no discharge to the Brine Line. • East Valley Water District Well#1071Permit No. 11022-2.11 1401 Citrus Avenue, San Bernardino,CA 92404 The East Valley Water District Well#107 is a well water extraction and treatment site. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. Contaminated groundwater is treated to remove nitrates and Perchlorate with an ion exchange system. The exchange process uses a saturated salt solution. The regeneration and rinsing process generates a waste brine solution. The spent brine solution is hauled to the Brine Line Collection Station. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), there was no discharge to the Brine Line. • Famndale Creamery. Inc. (Permit No. 11026-2) 1049 W. Baseline Road, San Bernardino,CA 92411 Farmdale Creamery, Inc. is a manufacturer of cheese, sour cream, buttermilk, and butter products. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. A self-regenerating soft water system is used to soften the potable water supply prior to the manufacturing process. The resin contained in the soft water tank is used to remove the calcium and magnesium ions(hardness)from the potable water supply. Spent resin is recharged with a sweet brine solution, containing concentrated sodium. Approximately 4,983 gallons per month of spent brine solution is discharged to two (2) on-site brine storage tanks. The spent brine solution is hauled to the Collection Station. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), there was no Flow discharged to the Brine Line. • Loma Linda University Power Plant(Permit No. 11051-1.21 11100 Anderson Street, Loma Linda,CA 92350 Loma Linda University Power Plant is an electrical generating facility. Two natural gas and one steam turbine generate approximately 11 MIN of electricity for the Loma Linda University and Medical Center. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. A self-regenerative soft water system and RO system are used to condition the water supplied to the boilers which generate the steam that powers the turbines. The resin contained in the soft water system is used to remove the calcium and magnesium ions (hardness) from the potable water supply. The spent resin is recharged with a sweet brine solution containing concentrated sodium. The spent brine waste is diverted from the domestic sewer and stored on-site. Approximately 44,616 gallons per month of spent brine solution is discharged to three brine storage tanks located on-site. The spent brine waste is hauled to the Collection Station. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total flow discharged to the Brine Line was 0.280 MG. • Loma Linda Veterans Affairs Medical Center(Permit No. 11052-2.11 11201 Benton Street, Loma Linda, CA 92357 Loma Linda Veterans Affairs Medical Center is a medical facility which provides full service hospital care for veterans. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. A self-regenerating soft water system is used to soften the 3-12 potable water supply prior to feeding the boiler system. The resin contained in the soft water tank is used to remove calcium and magnesium ions (hardness) from the potable water supply. Spent resin is recharged with a sweet brine solution, containing concentrated sodium. Approximately 12,738 gallons per month of spent brine solution is discharged to a 7,000 gallon underground storage tank located on-site. The spent brine waste is hauled to the Collection Station. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total Bow discharged to the Brine Line was 0.0974 MG. • Niaaara Bottling, LLC(Permit No. 11111.1.11 1401 North Alder Way. Rialto,CA 92376 Niagara Bottling, LLC (Niagara) is classified as an industrial user based on the type of wastewater generated and the volume of wastewater discharged to the Brine Line. Niagara manufactures purified drinking water. Municipal potable water is purified by advanced filtration and reverse osmosis before being sanitized with ozone. Concentrated reverse osmosis reject water, cooling tower blowdown, and process water from Clean-in- Place procedures are discharged to the onsite brine storage tank. The pennittee discharges to both the SBMWD and IEUA Collection Stations as their primary stations. Discharge to SBMWD is Monday through Friday and to IEUA on weekends and holidays when the SBMWD Collection Station is closed. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total Bow to the Brine Line was 2.119 MG. • Patton State Hospital (Permit No. 11060-1.3) 3102 E. Highland Avenue, Patton, CA 92369 Patton State Hospital is a state run psychiatric hospital. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. A self-regenerative soft water system is used to soften the potable water supply prior to the boilers, which provides heated water for various operations throughout the facility. The resin contained in the soft water tank is used to remove the calcium and magnesium ions (hardness) from the potable water supply. Spent resin is recharged with a sweet brine solution, containing concentrated sodium. Approximately 1,668 gallons per month of spent brine solution is discharged to a 4,000 gallon brine storage tank. The spent brine solution is hauled to the Collection Station. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total Flow discharged to the Brine Line was 5,283 gallons. Rayne Water Conditioning (Permit No. 11066-1.1) 939 W. Reece Street, San Bernardino, CA 92411 Rayne Water Conditioning regenerates resin contained in soft water exchange tanks for commercial and residential customers. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. The resin contained in the soft water tank is used to remove the calcium and magnesium ions (hardness)from the potable water supply. Spent resin is recharged with a sweet brine solution, containing concentrated sodium. Approximately 83,062 gallons per month of spent brine solution is discharged to one of multiple on-site brine storage tanks. The spent brine solution is hauled to the Collection Station. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total Bow discharged to the Brine Line was 0.5048 MG. New Permits—Direct 3-13 None New Permits—Indirect None Closed Permits—Direct None Closed Permits—Indirect • SunOpta Food Solutions (Permit No. 11080-1.2) Permit Closed 12118116 741 E. Baseline Street, San Bernardino, CA 92410 SunOpta Food Solutions is a manufacturer of citrus and fruit juices. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. A self-regenerative soft watering system is used to soften the potable water supply prior to the boilers, which provides heated water for various operations throughout the facility. The resin contained in the soft water tank is used to remove the calcium and magnesium ions (hardness) from the portable water supply. Spent resin is recharged with a sweet brine solution, containing concentrated sodium. Approximately 1,505 gallons per month of spent brine solution is discharged to a 1,200 gallon brine storage tank. The spent brine solution is hauled to the Collection Station. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total flow discharged to the Brine Line was 3,127 gallons. Enforcement Action None 3.2.5 San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District(Valley District) Description of Valley District Valley District's headquarters are located in the City of San Bernardino and Valley District serves most of the northern and eastern reaches of the watershed in San Bernardino County,with a small portion of its service area in Riverside County. Valley District was formed in 1954 to plan for the long-range water supply for the San Bernardino Valley. It imports water into its service area through participation in the California State Water Project and manages groundwater storage within its boundaries. It was incorporated under the Municipal Water District Act of 1911 (California Water Code Section 7100 at seq., as amended). Its enabling act includes a broad range of powers to provide water, as well as wastewater, stormwater disposal, recreation, and fire protection services. Valley District is a Municipal Water District responsible for the implementation of the pretreatment program for the industries connected to the Brine Line within its service area (Brine Line Reach IV-E). Valley District permits two (2) direct connections to the Brine Line. Two (2) are regulated with Direct Discharger Permits. On February 10, 2004, Valley District and SBMWD entered into a Collection Station Operating Agreement which is updated from time to time. The most recent version of the agreement is dated August 2011. Valley District is one of the member agencies of SAWPA and owns capacity rights for discharges to the Brine Line. 3-14 Existing Permits - Direct • Aqua Mansa Power Plant(Permit No. D1002-21 2040 Aqua Manse Road,Colton,CA 92324 Agua Mansa Power Plant is a 48-megawatt electrical generating facility comprised of single natural gas-fired LM 6000 aero derivative combustion turbine operating in a simple cycle mode. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Loral Limits apply. Agua Manse Power Plant is permitted to discharge RO concentrate water, filter backwash, spent evaporative cooling water, and the clarified wastewater from the oil/grease separator. All turbine wash water is contained in the waste wash water tank and disposed of properly. Agua Manse began discharging in May of 2003. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total flow to the Brine Line was 0.429 MG. • Mountainview Generatina Station Wermlt No. D1058-1.11 2492 W.San Bernardino Avenue, Redlands,CA 92374 Mountainview Generating Station is a categorical industry and is regulated under 40 CFR 423.17 (PSNS), Steam Electric Power Generation Point Source Category. Wastewater is generated from cooling tower blow-down and process wastewater from equipment cleaning. Pretreatment consists of chemical precipitation, chlorination, filtration, and pH adjustment. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31,2016),the total Flow to the Brine Line was 78.381 MG. Existing Permits- Indirect None New Permits- Direct None New Permits- Indirect None Closed Permits - Direct None Closed Permits - Indirect None Enforcement Action None 3.2.6 SAWPA Description of SAWPA 3-15 SAWPA is a Joint Powers Authority (JPA), classified as a Special District under State of California law. Five member agencies make up SAWPA. The agencies include the five largest water agencies in the Santa Ana River Watershed. SAWPA operates the Inland Empire Brine Line that connects to OCSD's collection system and the POTW. SAWPA, through the MOU with OCSD, has the primary responsibility as the Delegated Control Authority to ensure adequate implementation of pretreatment program responsibilities in the Upper Basin of the Brine Line. The member and contract agencies act on behalf of SAWPA as the primary contact with industries and manage information (permit application, permits, inspections, monitoring, enforcement, reporting, etc.). SAWPA and the member/contract agencies execute dual signature permits issued by SAWPA. SAWPA is responsible for the implementation and management of the pretreatment program and consolidates program information to communicate program activities to OCSD. SAWPA keeps current with member and contract agency programs through informal, formal and routine daily communications, joint program activities (e.g., inspections), and periodic member/contract agency program audits. SAWPA issues Direct Discharger and Emergency Permits to member/contract agency owned and operated facilities (e.g., groundwater desalters), one Special Purpose Direct Discharger Permit and all LWH Permits. Existing Permits- Direct • EMWD Collection Station (Permit No. D1055-2.1) 29641 Murrieta Road, Menifee,CA 92586 The EMWD Collection Station located at 29541 Murrieta Road, Menifee, CA, provides a brine disposal location for facilities in the SAWPA service area. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. One IU is currently permitted to haul brine wastewater to the EMWD Collection Station as their primary Collecton Station. No septic waste is accepted at the EMWD Collection Station. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016) EMWD received 10.578 MG at its Collection Station, with an average daily volume of 0.0566 MG. [This includes flow from EMWD's permitted Indirect Discharger that had to utilize an alternate Collection Station on a few occasions.] There is no wastewater generated at this facility. • EMWD Perris and Menifee Desalination Facility (Permit No. D1061-21 29541 Murrieta Road, Menifee, CA 92856 The Perris and Menifee Desalination Facility was issued its current permit by SAWPA on November 17, 2015. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. This facility, located at 29541 Murriets Rd., Menifee Ca. 92586, owned and operated by EMWD, uses reverse osmosis to treat brackish or high TDS groundwater for distribution to the public for potable use. Wastewater is produced by processing this brackish water through reverse osmosis membranes with the concentrate being discharged to the Brine Line. Two times per year a clean in place operation is performed on each train of membranes, of which there are four. This results in high and low pH solutions soaking the membranes separately and then discharging each into a neutralizafion tank before being discharged to the Brine Line. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016),the total flow to the Brine Line was 292.25 MG at approximately 7,300 mg/L of TDS. • IEUA Collection Station(Permit No. D1035-2.1) 16400 El Prado Road.Chino.CA 91710 The IEUA Collection Station located at 16400 El Prado Road, Chino, CA provides a brine disposal location for facilities in the SAWPA service area. This facility is classified as a 3-16 Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. Five (5) IUs are currently permitted to haul brine wastewater to the IEUA Collection Station as their primary Collection Station. No septic waste is accepted at the IEUA Collection Station. The pH of each load is tested prior to discharge and must be between 6.0 and 12.0 units. If a load is found to be out of range for pH, the station automatically locks a valve preventing discharge to the Brine Line. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016). IEUA received 1,063 MG at its Collection Station. There is no wastewater generated at this facility. • Inland Bioeneray. LLC (Permit No. D1072-2) 16090 Mountain Avenue, Chino, CA 91708 Inland Bioenergy, LLC is a liquid food waste processing facility, which generates biogas and electricity from food waste from commercial facilities. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. Wastewater is generated from the anaerobic digestion and digester effluent dewatering operations. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016), the total flow to the Brine Line was 14.582 MG. • JCSD Roaer D. Teaaarden Ion Exchange Water Treatment Plant (Permit No. D1070-2)4150 Etiwanda Avenue, Juruoa Valley, CA 91752 The Roger D. Teagarden Ion Exchange Water Treatment Plant is a potable water treatment plant that utilizes ion exchange technology to remove nitrates from well water for delivery to JCSD's customers. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. The IXP currently has rapacity to treat up to 21 MGD. Wastewater is discharged from the nitrate and water softener vessel regeneration processes, and from the automatic nitrate and chlorine residual analyzers. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016) the discharge to the Brine Line, via the JCSD Etiwanda Avenue connection was 16.178 MG. • JCSD Wells 17& 18 Ion Exchange Treatment Facility(Permit No. D1040-21 3474 De Forest Circle,Juruoa Valley,CA 91752 JCSD Well 17 & 18 IXP is a potable water treatment plant that utilizes ion exchange technology to remove nitrates from well water for delivery to JCSD's customers. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. The IXP currently has capacity to treat up to 5 MGD. Wastewater is discharged from the nitrate and water softener vessel regeneration processes, and from the automatic nitrate and chlorine residual analyzers. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the discharge to the Brine Line via the JCSD Etiwanda Avenue connection was 4.42 MG. • Juruoa Community Services District-Etiwanda Metering Station(Pernik No. D1D44-2111201 Harrel Street. Mira Loma,CA 91752 This permit authorizes JCSD to discharge non-reclaimable industrial wastewater and domestic wastewater to the Brine Line. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. The discharge is monitored at the Brine Line connection on Etiwanda Avenue. There are five (5) permitted facilities that discharge 3-17 through the Etiwanda Avenue connection that are permitted by JCSD. Additional flow to this connection is generated from a small number of commercial warehouses, as domestic wastewater. Roger D. Teagarden Ion Exchange Water Treatment Plant, JCSD Wells 17& 18 Ion Exchange Treatment Facility, and the Chino II Desalter share this connection and are permitted directly by SAWPA. The JCSD permitted dischargers are as follows and are described in detail in Section 3.2.3: 1. The SAWPA Del Real Foods, LLC(Permit No. D1021-2) 2, Magnolia Foods(Permit No. D1053-2) 3. Metal Container Corporation (Permit No. D1056-2) 4. Wakunaga of America Co., Ltd. Mira Loma Plant#1 (Permit No. D1084-2) 5. Wakunaga of America Co., Ltd. Mira Loma Plant#2(Permit No. D1085-1) The SAWPA permitted dischargers are as follows and are described within this section: 1. The Chino Desalter Authority II (Permit No. 131010-2.1) 2. JCSD Roger D. Teagarden Ion Exchange Water Treatment Plant (Permit No. D1070-2) 3. JCSD Wells 17& 18 Ion Exchange Treatment Facility(Permit No. D1040-2) During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the discharge from the Etiwanda Connection (excluding Chino II)was 132.889 MG. • Juruga Community Services District - Hamner Metering Station (Permit No. D1045-2.1) 11201 Harrel Street, Mira Loma,CA 91752 This connection consists of domestic wastewater generated from residential and a small number of commercial warehouses. This connection is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), discharge to the Brine Line was 6.364 MG. • Juruoa Community Services District—Wineville Metering Station(Permit No. D1048-2)5101 Wineville Avenue,Juruga Valley.CA 91752 This permit authorizes JCSD to discharge non-reclaimable industrial wastewater and domestic wastewater to the Brine Line. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. The discharge is monitored at the connection to the Brine Line on Wineville Avenue. There is one permitted facility that discharges through the Wineville Avenue connection. Additional flow to this connection is generated from a small number of commercial warehouses, as domestic wastewater. The Chino II Desalter shares this connection, and is permitted directly by SAWPA. The JCSD permitted discharger is as follows and is described in detail in Section 3.2.3: 1. ADESA Los Angeles(Permit No. D1001-1) During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the discharge from the Wineville Avenue connection (excluding Chino II)was 12.982 MG. • SBMWD Collection Station (Permit No. D1076-2.11 399 Chandler Place, San Bernardino, CA 92408 3 18 The SBMWD's Collection Station is located at the City of San Bernardino's Water Reclamation Plant and provides a brine disposal location for facilities in Valley District's service area. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. Nine(9) [Us are currently permitted to haul brine wastewater to the SBMWD Collection Station as their primary Collection Station. No septic waste is accepted at the Collection Station. The pH of each load is checked prior to discharge to the Brine Line and must be between 6.0 and 12.0 Standard pH Units to be accepted. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), a total 3.248 MG was received at the Collection Station. There is no wastewater generated at this facility. • Stringfellow Pretreatment Facility(Permit No. D1079-31 3400 Pyrite Street.Juruoa Valley, CA 92509 The Stringfellow site is in the SAWPA service area and was used as a hazardous waste landfill from 1956 to 1972. During that period, approximately 34 MG of liquid industrial waste from Orange and other surrounding counties were deposited at the site. Included in this waste were acids, caustics, solvents, pesticides, cyanides, and metal compounds. The site closed when liquid waste was apparently percolating from the waste pits and contaminating underlying soil and groundwater. The State of California is currently in charge of cleaning the contaminated groundwater at the site. The contaminated groundwater is pumped to treatment units that remove metals and organics. The treated water is then discharged to the Brine Line. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016). 22.04 MG of wastewater were discharged to the Brine Line. Discharge volume and analytical data are shown in Table 3.1. OCSD's Source Control inspectors visit the site monthly to sample and review the Stringfellow logbook, which shows self-monitoring sample data. OCSD and SAWPA conduct independent quarterly inspections. Sampling by both OCSD and SAWPA and analysis by certified laboratories confirms that the discharge consistently meets the limits required by the discharge permit. OCSD and SAWPA staffs review the laboratory analyses and other data regarding constituent sample results and operational changes. DTSC continues moving forward with the Pyrite Canyon Treatment Facility (PCTF) Development Project. The PCTF will be an upgraded, modernized, and a safer replacement of the existing aging Stringfellow plant built in 1985. Construction of the PCTF was completed during the reporting period with completion of the startup testing slated for mid-2017. Table 3.1 presents the average discharge concentrations and Flows at Stringfellow. 3-19 TABLE 3.1-AVERAGE HEAVY METAL DISCHARGE CONCENTRATIONS AND TREATED MONTHLY FLOWS AT THE STRING FELLOW CLEAN-UP SITE,AS REPORTED BY THE SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY(SAW PA(,JU LY 1, 2016 THROUGH DECEMBER 31,2016 Discharge Constituent Concentrations(mg/LI* Total Discharge Cyanide Toxic Date Gallons Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Mercury Nickel Silver Zinc (Total( Organics 2016 July 3,554,800 0.0014 0.0024 0.0007 0.0024 ND NO 0.0244 ND 0.0377 ND NO August 3,510,000 0,0025 0.0026 0.0013 0.0014 ND NO 0.0255 0.0001 0.0225 ND 0.0005 September 3,635,500 0.0016 0.0016 0.0009 0,0003 0,0001 . NO 0.0184 0.0001 OA239 ND 0.0024 October 3,719,700 0.0016 0.0033 0.0022 0.0018 ND 0.00001 0.0371 NO 0.0288 ND 0.0015 November 3,556,900 0.0016 0.0020 0.0015 0.0012 ND NO 0.0259 NO 0.0466 ND 0.0017 December 4,063,100 0.0013 0.0019 0.0004 0.0019 ND NO 0.0210 NO 0.0214 ND 0.0012 Summary Flow al Average concentration (mg/LI 2016 Myr 22,040,000 0.0016 0.0024 0.0012 0.0015 ND NO 0.0260 NO 0.0307 ND 0.0012 2015/16 36,197,800 0,0014 0.0017 0.0012 0.0018 ND ND 0.0189 0.0002 0.0394 ND 0.0009 2014/15 34,093,900 0.0009 0.0007 0.0003 0.0012 ND NO 0,0089 0.0003 0.0416 NO 0.0005 2013/14 34,969,266 NO 0.0001 ND 0.0010 ND ND OA116 NO 0,0144 0.0006 0.0002 2012/13 40,412,600 NO 0.0012 ND NO NO 0.000005 0.0295 NO 0.0150 ND 0.0003 2011/12 52,163,058 0.0001 0.0015 NO NO NO ND 0,0299 ND 0.0034 NO 0.0072 Permit Discharge Limitation** Not applicable 2.0 0,064 2.0 3.0 0.58 0.03 3.51 0.43 0.7 1.2 0.58 NO=Not Detectable NA= December samples not available at report time. This represents the average of all samples taken during the month. These values represent the discharge limits that must be achieved by the Stringfellow site in accordance with their discharge permit issued by SAW PA to California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 3-20 • The Chino Desalter Authority I(Permit No. D1081-2) 6905 Kimball Avenue, Chino, CA 91710 The Chino Basin Desalter Authority is supplied with groundwater from 14 wells in the local area. The brackish water is converted to a potable water quality using reverse osmosis (RO) and ion exchange (IX) technologies. Wastewater is generated from RO concentration and IX regeneration processes. This facility is commonly known as the Chino I Desalter. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016), the facility discharged 324.663 MG at approximately 6,867 ni of TDS. • The Chino Desalter Authority II(Permit No. D1010-2.1) 11251 Harrel Street,Juruoa Valley.CA 91752 The Chino II Desalter was designed to accomplish the following objectives: 1. To provide a safe and dependable potable water supply source for local urban users. 2. To mitigate high TDS and nitrate levels in the local groundwater from many years of dairy farming in the area. The Chino II Desalter is supplied with brackish water from nine (9) wells in the local area. The brackish water is converted to a potable water quality using RO technology. The plant has capacity to produce an average of 10 MGD and a maximum of 15 MGD of potable water with brine concentrate discharge of approximately 1.5 MGD at the Etwanda Avenue connection and 0.2 MGD at the Wineville Avenue connection that discharge to the Brine Line. The potable water produced augments the water supply for four entities, Chino Hills, Chino, Norco, and the Jurupa Community Services District. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016). the total brine discharged to the Etiwanda Avenue connection was 226.35 MG, for an average daily Flow of 1.25 MGD, with an average of 3,350 mg/L of TDS. At the Wineville Avenue connection, the total brine discharged was 10.804 MG with an average of 25,500 mg/L of TDS. • WMWD Arlington Desalter Facility(Permit No. D1088-2.1) 11611 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, CA 92503 WMWD and Orange County Water District, member agencies of SAWPA, in cooperation with the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and the State of California Water Resources Control Board, constructed the Arlington Desalter Facility. Ownership of the facility was transferred to WMWD in 2005. It was designed to accomplish four objectives: 1. Reduce salts entering the Santa Ana River, 2. Provide a clean water supply, 3. Restore the groundwater in the Arlington Basin to a usable condition, and 4. Restore the condition of the Arlington Basin for future water storage The plant is supplied with brackish water from five wells placed along Magnolia Avenue in Arlington. The brackish water (1,100 mg/L TDS, 90 mg/L nitrate) is converted to potable water quality, using RO technology. The facility has the capacity to produce 6 MGD of potable water, which results in a brine concentrate wastewater of approximately 1.4 MGD. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. 3-21 During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), 197.22 MG of wastewater was discharged to the Brine Line at approximately 5,233 mg/L of TDS. WMWD Collection Station (Permit No. D1087-2) 2205 Railroad Street.Corona,CA 92880 WMWD's Collection Station is located at the City of Corona's WRF No. 1 at 2205 Railroad St. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Loral Limits apply. This Brine Line Collection Station provides a primary brine disposal location for facilities in WMWD's service area. Eight (8) dischargers are currently permitted to haul wastewater to the WMWD Collection Station as their primary Collection Station. No septic waste is accepted at the WMWD Collection Station. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), a total of 0.7253 MG was received at the Collection Station. [This does not include Flow from Indirect Dischargers that had to utilize the WMWD Collection Station as an alternate on a few occasions.] There is no wastewater generated at this facility. YVWD -Henry Wochholz Regional Water Recycling Facility(Permit No. D1090-2.1)880 W.County Line Road, Calimesa, CA 92320 The Henry Wochholz Regional Water Recycling Facility's Reverse Osmosis Facility was issued a permit by SAWPA on May 2, 2014. This 2.5 MGD facility has been designed for the Henry Wochholz Regional Water Recycling Facility owned and operated by the Yucaipa Valley Water District to improve the quality of existing Title 22 quality reclaimed water. The reject brine waste produced from the RO process at the RO Facility is discharged to the Brine Line. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. The WRWRF ROF service area includes two industrial Permittees: 1) Sorensen Engineering with Permit No. CP-001-03, Class I—CIU per 40 CFR 433.17(a) PSNS Metal Finishing issued by the YVWD for a maximum Flow of 20,000 gallons per day. It should be noted that in most rases the YVWD local limits are more stringent than the categorical limits, especially for metals and cyanide. Self-monitoring requirements are specified by pollutant on a semi-annual basis. The Sorensen permit clearly denotes the most stringent limits that apply. 2)Skat-Trek Performance Products with Permit No. CP-003-03, Class II — Non-Significant CIU per 40 CFR 464.15, Subpart A, PSES for Aluminum Casting and 40 CFR 464.35, Subpart C, PSES for Ferrous Casting issued by YVWD as a zero discharge permit. The no discharge requirement is clearly noted in the permit and the applicable categorical limit tables are provided in the permit as informational items. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), a total of 60A44 MG was discharged to the Brine Line from this facility. Existing Permits-Emergency EMWD Energy Dissipater(Permit No. E11068-2) 636 Minthom Street, Lake Elsinore,CA 92530 This permit is issued by EMWD to allow discharge to the Brine Line for emergency situations only. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User due to potential daily discharge rates in an emergency situation and therefore Local Limits apply. Discharge to the Brine Line will only be made when the recycled water, to be discharged to the Temescal Creek, is off-spec due to high or low pH and/or chlorine residual. The Permit is limited to a maximum of 9.5 MGD. The discharge must meet all discharge limits to the Brine Line. 3-22 During the reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), no recycled water was discharged to the Brine Line. • EMWD Railroad Canyon Pipeline(Permit No. E1067-2.1) Railroad Canyon Road, Canyon Lake,CA 92587 This permit is issued by SAWPA to allow discharge to the Brine Line for emergency situations only(example; Reach 4 recycled water dewatering). This facility is classified as a Significant Industral User due to potential daily discharge rates in an emergency situation and therefore Local Limits apply. During the reporting period (July 1, 2015 through December 31, 2016), no recycled water was discharged to the Brine Line. • Inland Empire Utilities Aaencv(Los Serranos)(Permit No. E11037.1) 6075 Kimball Avenue,Chino,CA 91708 This permit authorizes emergency discharge of wastewater from IEUA's Chino Interceptor/Los Serranos Trunk Sewers to the Brine Line. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User due to potential daily discharge rates in an emergency situation and therefore Local Limits apply. The permit is intended to be for emergency use only in the event of a catastrophic failure of RP-5's influent pump station. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016), there were no emergency discharges to the Brine Line. • Juruoa Community Services District - Archibald Metering Station (SAWPA Permit No. E1041-1)6990 Archibald Avenue, Eastvale, CA 92880 This connection was and originally provided residential sewage disposal for 495 homes. Only domestic wastewater from the housing subdivision is generated. The domestic flow was diverted to the WRCRWA SRPS in 2007. This permit is for emergency situations only. This facility is classified as an Industrial User due to potential daily discharge rates in an emergency situation and therefore Local Limits apply. JCSD is not permitted to discharge any wastewater to this Brine Line connection, at any time, without previously notifying SAWPA. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), there were no emergency discharges to the Brine Line. 3-23 • Juruoa Community Services District-Celebration Materina Station (Permit No. E1042-11 5972 Hamner Avenue, Eastvale, CA 92880 This connection originally provided residential sewage disposal for 733 apartments and 244 residential homes. Only domestic wastewater from the apartments and residential homes is generated. The domestic flow was diverted to the WRCRWRP in October 2012. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. JCSD treats this permit as an emergency permit and will notify SAWPA prior to any discharge, until the permit is reissued as an emergency permit. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), there were no emergency discharges to the Brine Line. Juruoa Community Services District - Chandler Lift Station (Permit No. E1043-1) 14087 Chandler Street, Eastvale.CA 92880 This connection was originally provided residential sewage disposal for tract residential homes. Only domestic wastewater was generated from this connection. The domestic flow was diverted to the WRCRWRP in March of 2007. This permit is for emergency situations only. This facility is classified as an Industrial User due to potential daily discharge rates in an emergency situation and therefore Local Limits apply. JCSD is not permitted to discharge any wastewater to this Brine Line connection, at any time, without previously notifying SAWPA. JCSD is allowed to test run the pumping system at the Chandler Connection with potable water on a quarterly frequency. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), there were no emergency discharges to the Brine Line. • Juruoa Community Services District-Hamner Lift Station(Permit No. E1046- 2.21 7302 Hamner Avenue. Eastyale,CA 91752 The JCSD connection to the Brine Line at the Hamner Lift Station originally provided residential sewage disposal for residential homes. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. Only domestic wastewater from the residential homes is generated. The domestic flow was diverted to the WRCRWRP in April of 2007. This permit is for emergency situations only. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User due to potential daily discharge rates in an emergency situation and therefore Local Limits apply. JCSD is not permitted to discharge any wastewater to this Brine Line connection, at any time, without previously notifying SAWPA. JCSD is allowed to test run the pumping system at the Hamner Lift Station Connection Line with no prior notification to SAWPA. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), there were no emergency discharges to the Brine Line. 3-24 • Juruoa Community Services District - Harrison Avenue (Permit No. E1047- 2.2) 6998 Harrison Avenue, Eastvale,CA 92880 The JCSD connection to the Brine Line at Harrison Avenue was originally provided residential sewage disposal original. Only domestic wastewater from the residential homes is generated. The domestic flow was diverted to the WRCRWRP in March 2007. This permit is for emergency situations only. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User due to potential daily discharge rates in an emergency situation and therefore Loral Limits apply. JCSD is not permitted to discharge any wastewater to this Brine Line Connection, at any time, without previously notifying SAWPA. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), there were no emergency discharges to the Brine Line. • SBMWD Water Reclamation Plant(Permit No. E1075-2) 399 Chandler Place,San Bernardino.CA 92408 This permit authorizes emergency discharge of wastewater to the Brine Line. This would only occur if the Rapid Infiltration and Extraction System facility was unable to process the incoming wastewater. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User due to potential daily discharge rates in an emergency situation and therefore Local Limits apply. The wastewater discharged to the Brine Line will only occur under extreme conditions in the event the offsite Rapid Infiltration and Extraction Facility is unable to process the incoming volume of wastewater. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), there was no discharge to the Brine Line. • WRCRWA South Reaional Pumping Station(SRPS)(Permit No. E7089-2) 671 N. Lincoln Avenue. Corona,CA 92880 The SRPS was designed and constructed to treat domestic wastewater that was previously discharged to the Brine Line. The treated domestic wastewater can now be reused as a non-potable water supply. The project is expected to develop 8,000 acre feet of water per year for beneficial use. The SRPS furnishes regional wastewater treatment services to Home Gardens Sanitation District (HGSD), City of Corona, City of Norco, JCSD, and WMWD. The 8 MGD facility includes primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment processes. Approximately 40% to 50% of the facility's influent is lifted through the South Regional Pump Station. A "V" notch weir and a connection to the Brine Line exist at this lift station as an emergency alternative to divert flow from the SRPS to the Brine Line if a power outage or other situation were to occur. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User due to potential daily discharge rates in an emergency situation and therefore Local Limits apply. Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority, a JPA consisting of Norco, HGSD, JCSD,WMWD, and the City of Corona, owns the SRPS. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016)a total of 3.432 MG was discharged to the Brine Line. Date: W28116 Start Time: 4:45am End Time: 5:51 am Volume: 128,040 gallons Reason for Discharge: WRCRWA Plant Expansion 3-25 Date: 7128116 Start Time: 11:41 pm End Time: 7:15 am Volume: 880,760 gallons Reason for Discharge: WRCRWA Plant Expansion Date: 9112116 Start Time: 6:40 pm End Time: 7:40 pm Volume: 105,000 gallons Reason for Discharge: Bar Screen Failure Date: 10/18/16 Start Time: 10:40 am End Time: 10:50 am Volume: 17,361 gallons Reason for Discharge: Bar Screen Failure Date: 10/19/16 Start Time: 5:22 pm End Time: 7:11 pm Volume: 258,680 gallons Reason for Discharge: WCRWA Plant Expansion Date: 10/20/16 Start Time: 11:00 am End Time: 11:03 am Volume: 5,208 gallons Reason for Discharge: SCADA Maintenance Date: 1023116 Start Time:2:40 pm End Time: 3:32 pm Volume: 90,272 gallons Reason for Discharge: Bar Screen Failure Date: 11/18/16 Start Time: 10:53 am End Time: 11:13 am Volume: 42,000 gallons Reason for Discharge: SCADA Maintenance Date: 1121/16 Start Time: 11:24 am End Time: 1:41 am Volume:237,832 gallons Reason for Discharge: Electrical Failure from Downed Power Lines Date: 12/28/16 Start Time: 11:55 pm End Time: 8:00 am Volume: 833,280 gallons Reason for Discharge: Emergency Maintenance Date: 12/29/16 Start Time: 11:55 pm 3-26 End Time: 8:00 am Volume: 833,280 gallons Reason for Discharge: Emergency Maintenance Existina Permits-Indirect • EMWD Regional Water Reclamation Facility(Permit No. 11107-1.21 2270 Trumble Road, Perris.CA 92572 The Facility owns and operates four (4) Regional Water Reclamation Facilities (RWRFs) which treat domestic and industrial wastewater. The four RWRF are located at San Jacinto Valley RWRF, Moreno Valley RWRF, Perris Valley RWRF and Temecula Valley RWRF. Approximately every four to six years, the RWRF chlorine scrubbers require maintenance and cleaning. The process requires sodium hydroxide solids in the scrubber to be liquefied using munatic acid. The solution is then neutralized to an acceptable pH concentration and hauled by a SAWPA permitted liquid waste hauler to a Brine Line Collection Station for disposal. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Loral Limits apply. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), there was no wastewater discharged to the Brine Line. New Permits-Direct None New Permits-Emergency • Juruoa Community Services District Scholar Way Metering Station(Permit No. El113-1)6980 Scholar Way Metering Station,Eastvale CA 92880 The JCSD connection to the Brine Line at the Scholar Way Metering Station contains domestic wastewater from the residential homes. Under non-emergency conditions this domestic flow is diverted to the WRCRWRP. This permit is for emergency situations only. This facility is classed as a Significant Industrial User due to potential daily discharge rates in an emergency situation and therefore Local Limits apply. JCSD is not permitted to discharge any wastewater to this Brine Line Connection, at any time, without previously notifying SAWPA. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), there were no emergency discharges to the Brine Line. New Permits-Indirect None Closed Permits- Direct None Closed Permits-Indirects None Enforcement Action None 3-27 3.2.7 Liquid Waste Hauler(LWH) Program Beginning in April of 2010, SAWPA and the member agencies began to discuss means and methods to facilitate the efficient usage of the Collection Stations by the Indirect Dischargers. Severe[ items were discussed. One of the items identified was to provide a means for an Indirect Discharger to utilize an "Alternate" Collection Station in case the Primary Collection Station was unavailable for a particular reason. This would potentially prevent the Indirect Discharger from having to stop production due to a Collection Station issue. In parallel to the Alternate Collection Station effort, SAWPA and the member agencies agreed that SAWPA would permit the LWHs. This would allow the LWHs to have only one permit for service at the four Collection Stations. This also facilitates utilization of the Indirect Discharger's regular LWH if an Alternate Collection Station must be used. LWHs permitted by SAWPA are permitted to discharge to any of the Collection Stations provided the driver has been oriented at the Collection Station where the discharge is to occur. In the case of Alternate Collection Station utilization, the Collection Station is to be notified 24 hours in advance. At the Collection Station operators discretion, the 24-hour notice may be waived. Permitted Wastehaulers 1. Advanced Chemical Transport(Permit No. H1100-1)Closed 1214/16 2. Environmental Management Technologies, Inc. (Permit No. H1025-1.2) 3. Giuliano&Sons Briners, Inc. (Permit No. H1031-1) 4. Haz Mat Trans, Inc. (Permit No. H1033-1.4) 5. Hazardous Waste Transportation Services(Permit No. H1034-1.4) 6. Hidden Villa Ranch(Permit No. H1120-1) 7. Inland Pumping Service, LLC. (Permit No. H1038-2.1)Closed 8/1/16 8. K-VAC Environmental Services, Inc. (Permit No. H1049-1.3) 9. O.C.Vacuum, Inc. (Permit No. H1112-1) 10. Rayne Water Conditioning (Permit No. H1066-1) 11. Western Environmental Services, Inc. (Permit No. H1098-1) New Liquid Waste Hauler Permits • Hidden Villa Ranch (Permit No. H1120-1) Closed Waste Hauler Permits • Advanced Chemical Transport(Permit No.H1100-1) • Inland Pumping Service(Permit No. H1038-2.1) Waste Hauler Collection Stations There are four (4) SAWPA approved Collection Stations, one within each of the member agency's service area. They are as follows: • EMWD Collection Station (Permit No.D1055-2.11 29641 Murrieta Road,Menifee.CA 92586 The EMWD Collection Station located at 29541 Murrieta Road, Menifee, CA. This Collection Station provides the primary brine disposal location for facilities in the EMWD service area. This Collection Station is an automatic Collection Station. 3-28 One facility is currently permitted to haul brine wastewater to the EMWD Collection Station as its primary Collection Station. No septic waste is accepted at the EMWD Collection Station. The facility is as follows: 1. Infineon Technologies Americas Corporation(Permit No. 11039-2) • IEUA Collection Station(Permit No. D1035-2.1) 16400 El Prado Road, Chino, CA 91710 The IEUA Collection Station is located at 16400 El Prado Road, Chino, CA. This Collection Station provides the primary brine disposal location for facilities in the IEUA service area. This Collection Station is an automatic Collection Station. During the reporting period six(6) facilities were permitted to haul brine wastewater to the IEUA Collection Station as their primary Collection Station. As of this report Five (5) facilities are currently permitted to haul brine wastewater to the IEUA Collection Station as their primary Collection Station. No septic waste is accepted at the station. The pH of each load is tested prior to discharge and must be between 6.0 and 12.0 Standard pH Units to be accepted. The six facilities permitted during the reporting period are as follows: 1. C.C. Graber Co. (Permit No. 11005-2) 2. Chemicals Inc. (Permit No. 11097-1.1)Closed 9113/16 3. Eastside Water Treatment Plant(Permit No. 11024-2) 4. Niagara Bottling Inc. (Permit No. 11114-1) 5. San Antonio Regional Hospital(Permit No. 11096-1.1) 6. ShawCor Pipe Protection, LLC (Permit No. 11077-2) • SBMWD Collection Station (Permit No. D1076-2.11 399 Chandler Place, San Bernardino,CA 92408 Valley's Collection Station is located at the City of San Bernardino's Water Reclamation Plant and provides a brine disposal location for facilities in the Valley service area. This facility is a manned Collection Station owned and operated by SBMWD. During the reporting period ten (10) facilities were permitted to haul brine wastewater to the SBMWD Collection Station as their primary Collection Station. As of this report nine(9)facilities are currently permitted to haul brine wastewater to the SBMWD Collection Station as their primary Collection Station. No septic waste is accepted at the Collection Station. The pH of each load is checked prior to discharge to the Brine Line and must be between 6.0 and 12.0 Standard pH Units to be accepted. The 10 facilities permitted during the reporting period are as follows: 1. Angelica Textile Services(Permit No. 11003-2.1) 2. City of Riverside John W. North(Permit No. 11014-1.1) 3. East Valley Water District Well#107(Permit No. 11022-2.1) 4. Farndale Creamery, Inc. (Permit No. 11026-2) 5. Loma Linda University Power Plant(Permit No. 11051-1.2) 6. Loma Linda Veterans Affairs Medical Center(Permit No. 11052-2.1) 7. Niagara Bottling, LLC(Permit No. 11111-1.1) 9. Patton State Hospital(Permit No. 11060-1.3) 9. Rayne Water Conditioning (Permit No. 11066-1.1) 10. SunOpta Food Solutions(Permit No. 11080-1.2)Closed 12/18/16 3-29 WMWD Collection Station[Permit No. D1087-2) 2205 Railroad Street.Corona,CA 92880 The WMWD Collection Station is located at the City of Corona's Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) No. 1 at 2205 Railroad St. This Collection Station provides a brine disposal location for facilities in WMWD's service area. This facility is an automatic Collection station owned by WMWD and operated by the City of Corona's WRF staff. Eight(8) IUs are currently permitted to haul wastewater to the WMWD Collection Station as their primary Collection Station. No septic waste is accepted at the WMWD Collection Station. The pH of each load is checked prior to discharge and must be between 6.0 and 12.0 Standard pH to be accepted. The 8 facilities are as follows, 1. Corona Regional Medical Center(Permit No. 11016-2) 2. Decre Roofing, Inc. (Permit No. 11020-1) 3. Giuliano&Sons Briners, Inc. (Permit No. 11031-2) 4. Hidden Villa Ranch(Permit No. 11121-1) 5. La Sierra University (Permit No. 11050-2) 6. Prudential Overall Supply(Permit No. 11062-2) 7. Qualified Mobile, Inc. (Permit No. 11064-2) 8. Sierra Aluminum Company(Permit No. 11078-2) 3.2.8 Western Municipal Water District(WMWD) Description of WMWD WMWD was formed in 1954 under the Municipal Water District Act of 1911, for the purpose of bringing supplemental water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to a growing western Riverside County. WMWD's service area covers 527 square miles, serving a population of approximately 900,000 people. WMWD serves 10 wholesale customers with imported water via the Colorado River and the State Water Project. WMWD also supplies imported water and groundwater directly to approximately 23,000 residential, commercial, and agricultural customers in the areas of El Sobrante, Eagle Valley, Temescal Creek, Woodcrest, Orangecrest, Mission Grove, Lake Mathews, March Air Reserve Base, Rainbow Canyon, and portions of the cities of Riverside and Mumeta. The Murrieta division provides water and wastewater services in a 6.5-square mile portion of Murrieta and relies on both groundwater and imported sources. WMWD headquarters are located in Riverside, CA and serves the western Riverside County portion of the watershed, as well as portions of the Santa Margarita Watershed. WMWD is responsible for the implementation of the pretreatment program for the industries connected to the Brine Line within its service area. SAWPA and WMWD jointly issue permits to seven (7) Direct Dischargers. Eight(8) Indirect Dischargers are permitted by SAWPANVMWD to haul wastewater to WMWD's Collection Station located in the City of Corona's WRF No. 1 at 2205 Railroad Street in Corona. One(1) emergency permit has been issued for use, if required. Existina Permits—Direct Anita B.Smith Treatment Facility(Permit No.D1074.21 2100 Fleetwood Drive,Riverside,CA 92609 The Rubidoux Community Services District-Anita S. Smith Nitrate Removal Facility treats well water. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. The treatment process utilizes an ion exchange process for nitrate removal. 3-30 During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), discharge to the Brine Line was 1.245 MG. • Corona Energy Partners(Permit No. D1015-11 1130 W. Rincon Street.Corona,CA 92880 Corona Energy Partners (CEP) is a co-generation power plant that produces electrical power and steam. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. CEP discharges cooling tower blow-down, boiler blow-down, and demineralization unit regenerate and R.O. concentrate wastewater to the Brine Line at approximately 0.1 MGD. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the facility's discharge to the Brine Line was 7.53 MG. • Dairy Farmers of America Distilled Water Plant(Permit No.D1018-11 1138 W. Rincon Street, Corona, CA 92880 Dairy Farmers of America's Distilled Water Plant produces distilled water. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. The wastewater is generated from the RO blow-down, cooling tower blow-down, and the clean in place activities used to clean the distilled water plant and wash-down water. The maximum permitted flow is 0.400 MG. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the facility's discharge to the Brine Line was 4.702 MG. • Dart Container Corporation(Permit No. D11019-21 150 S. Maple Street, Corona, CA 92880 Dart Container Corporation manufactures various types of disposable beverage containers. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. An on-site water softening system provides conditioned water to the boilers, which generate hot water and steam for the facility, and water for the cooling towers. The water softener regeneration and boiler blowdown water is discharged to an on-site brine storage tank,which is then batch discharged to the Brine Line. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the facility's discharge to the Brine Line was 4.088 MG. Frutarom USA, Inc. (Permit No. D1029-2) 790 E. Harrison Street. Corona,CA 92879 Frutarom USA, Inc. is a facility that produces flavor bases for the food industry. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. The wastewater generated at Frutarom USA, Inc. consists of dryer, blender, and bottling rinse waters. The first rinse of each process area is captured, and hauled off site for disposal. The second rinse is captured, conveyed through a clarifier, flow equalized, pH adjusted, and batch discharged to the Brine Line. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total flow to the Brine Line was 0.7519 MG. • Temescal Desalter(Permit No. D1012-2) 745 Corporation Yard Way, Corona, CA 92880 3-31 The City of Corona DWP Temescal Desalter began operation in September 2001. It was designed to accomplish the following objectives: 1. To provide a safe and dependable potable water supply source for local urban users. 2. To mitigate high TDS and nitrate levels in the local groundwater. 3. To clean groundwater that ultimately makes its way to the Santa Ana River and provides a portion of Orange County's water supply. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the facility discharged 281.78 MG to the Brine Line at approximately 6,600 mg1L of TDS. • Wellington Foods. Inc.(Permit No. D1086-2) 1930 California Avenue, Corona, CA 92883 Wellington Foods, Inc. is a contract manufacturer which produces and packages a variety of liquid and powder nutritional supplements for the nutritional supplement industry. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. Wastewater is generated from product spills, wash-down, R.O. concentrate, and clean in place activities. The wastewater treatment system consists of a belowground sump (1,200 gallons), an equalization tank (5,000 gallons), and a neutralization tank for pH adjustment an above- ground magnetic flow meter/recorder. The neutralization tank uses pH meters to detect the pH of the wastewater and automatically adds either a caustic (such as sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide)or an acid (such as sulfuric acid or nitric acid)to balance the pH. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), discharge to the Brine Line was 1.924 MG. Existing Permits-Emergency • City of Corona's Water Reclamation Facility No. 1 (Permit No. E1013-21 2205 Railroad Street, Corona, CA 92880 This permit authorizes discharge of wastewater from the City of Corona's Water Reclamation Facility No. 1 in emergency situations only. This facility is classified as a Significant Industrial User due to potential daily discharge rates in an emergency situation and therefore Local Limits apply. The City of Corona is not permitted to discharge any wastewater or the contents of any process tanks to the Brine Line, at any time, without previously notifying SAWPA personnel of the proposed discharge. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), there were no emergency discharges to the Brine Line. Existing Permits—Indirect • Corona Regional Medical Center(Permit No. 11016-2) 800 S. Main Street, Corona, CA 92882 The Corona Regional Medical Center is a full-service medical facility, with a 140-bed capacity. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. A water softening system supplies soft water to boilers that provide domestic hot water and steam throughout the facility. High EC water softener regeneration rinse water is diverted from the domestic sewer to a storage tank for disposal at the Collection Station. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31,2016), the total flow to the Brine Line was 0.0969 MG. 3-32 • Decre Roofing. Inc.(Permit No.11020-1) 1230 Railroad Street, Corona,CA 92882 Decra Roofing, Inc. manufactures metal roofing products. The company formulates their own water-based acrylic paint on-site. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. Wastewater generated on-site is from the overspray/over glaze process, paint formulation cleanup, and process area Floor cleanup. The wastewater is treated on-site. The treated wastewater is disposed of at the Collection Station. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total flow to the Brine Line was 0.1096 MG. • Giuliano&Sons Briners. Inc. (Permit No. 11031-21 10380 Alder Avenue, Bloomington, CA 92316 Giuliano & Sons Briners, Inc. pickles a variety of vegetables, such as jalapenos, cauliflower, celery, carrots, and Ortega chilies. Vinegar, acetic acid, sodium chloride, calcium chloride, and sulfur dioxide solutions are used to process the vegetables and fruit. The wastewater generated from these processes is hauled to the Collection Station. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. During this reporting period(July 1, 2016 through December 31,2016),the total flow to the Brine Line was 0.236 MG. • Hidden Villa Ranch(Permit No. 11121-11 1811 Mountain Avenue, Norco,CA 92860 Hidden Villa Ranch washes, sanitizes and packages raw poultry shell eggs. The facility is used for warehouse and distribution. The wastewater is generated from washing and sanitizing the shell eggs as well as equipment and Floor wash-down. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), there was no flow to the Brine Line. • La Sierra University(Permit No. 11050-2) 4500 Riverwalk Parkway, Riverside,CA 92616 La Sierra University uses a water softening system to supply soft water to boilers that provide domestic hot water throughout the campus. High EC water softener regeneration rinse water is diverted from the domestic sewer to a storage tank for disposal at the Collection Station. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total flow to the Brine Line was 0.0216 MG. • Prudential Overall Supply (Permit No. 11062-21 6997 Jurooa Avenue,Riverside, CA 92504 Prudential Overall Supply is a commercial account laundry cleaning facility. High EC water softener regeneration rinse water is diverted from the domestic sewer to a storage tank for disposal at the Collection Station. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and 3-33 therefore Local Limits apply. During this reporting period(July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total flow to the Brine Line was 0.0879 MG. • Qualified Mobile. Inc.(Permit No. 11064-2) 1720 Industrial Avenue. Norco.CA 92860 Qualified Mobile, Inc. performs mobile off site vehicle washing services. Ion exchange portable units are used to reduce the hardness of the water used to clean the automobiles. This reduces the spotting effect the rinse water may have on serviced automobiles. The portable ion exchange units are recharged at the main facility. The high strength brine wastewater generated from recharging the ion exchange unit is discharged to a Brine Holding Tank. This wastewater is pH adjusted as needed. The high strength brine wastewater is then pumped to another Brine Holding Tank. The high strength brine wastewater is disposed of at the Collection Station. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. During this reporting period (July 1,2016 through December 31, 2016), the total flow to the Brine Line was 0.0580 MG. • Sierra Aluminum Company, Inc. (Permit No. 11078-2) 2345 Fleetwood Drive, Riverside, CA 92509 Sierra Aluminum is an aluminum manufacturer (40 CFR 467) that produces extruded aluminum for use in window and doorframes in commercial, residential, and motor home installations. The wastewater hauled to the Brine Line is generated from high strength brine waste from the R.O. system, Water-Softener, Carbon 8 Multimedia filter regeneration. All categorical wastewater (generated from cooling tower blow down water used to cool billet logs (Direct Chill Casting), cooling tower blow down water used to cool hydraulic oil in the extrusion press; and water used to quench aluminum after the extrusion press) is discharged under separate permit to the local POTW. The Die Cleaning and Aluminum Etching waste water is transported to Sierra Aluminum's Fontana facility and used for pH adjustment. This facility is classified as an Industrial User and therefore Local Limits apply. During this reporting period (July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016), the total flow to the Brine Line was 0.1466 MG. New Permits - Direct None New Permits - Indirect • Hidden Villa Ranch (Permit No. 11121-1) Closed Permits—Direct None Closed Permits-Indirect None Enforcement Action 3-34 • Decre Roofing Systems Permit No. 110204 1230 Railroad Street,Corona CA 92882 Decra Roofing Systems (Decra) was placed in Significant Noncompliance in the 2n° quarter of 2016 for the parameters of Copper and Zinc. Decra has since maintained consistent compliance and was subsequently removed from Significant Noncompliance on 911/2016. 3.3 Permittees in Significant Noncompliance (SNC) At the end of each quarter, EPA requires the evaluation of each Us compliance status using a six- month period. Each IU is evaluated for SNC four times during the year, and the total evaluation period covers 15 months(beginning with the last quarter of the previous pretreatment year through the end of the current year). As of December 31, 2016, of the active seventy-five (75) Permittees, (does not include LWHs), there was one Permittee classified as SNC. An industry was determined to be in SNC if it incurred a violation that met one or more of the criteria listed below as provided in 40 CFR, Part 403. • Chronic violations of wastewater discharge limits are defined as those in which 66%or more of all measurements for the same pollutant taken during a consecutive six-month period exceed (by any magnitude) a numeric pretreatment standard or requirement including instantaneous limits as defined by 40 CFR 403.3(I). • Technical review criteria (TRC) violation are defined as those in which 33% or more of all measurements taken for the same pollutant during a consecutive six-month period equal or exceeds the product of the numeric pretreatment standard or requirement including instantaneous limits, as defined by 40 CFR 403.3(I) multiplied by the applicable TRC (TRC=1.4 for BOD, TSS, fats, oil and grease, and 1.2 for all other pollutants except pH). • Any other violation of a pretreatment standard or requirement (daily maximum or long term average, instantaneous limit or narrative standard) that has caused, alone or in combination with other discharges, interference or pass through (including endangering the health of POTW or SAWPA personnel or the general public). • Any discharge of a pollutant that has caused imminent endangerment to human health, welfare, or the environment; or has resulted in POTWs or SAWPA's exercise of emergency authority to halt or prevent such a discharger. • Failure to meet within 90 days after the scheduled date, a compliance schedule milestone contained in a local control mechanism or enforcement order, for starting construction, completing construction, or for attaining final compliance. • Failure to provide, within 45 days of the due date, any required reports such a baseline monitoring reports, 90-day compliance reports, periodic self-monitoring reports, and reports with compliance schedules. • Failure to pay, within 30 days, all applicable user application, permit and enforcement penalty fees. • Failure to accurately report noncompliance. • Any other violation or group of violations, which may include a violation of Best Management Practices, which the POTW or SAWPA believes will adversely affect the operation or implementation of the SAWPA's pretreatment program, or the Brine Line or tributaries thereto. 3-35 A summary of Permittees in SNC is presented in Table 3.2. TABLE 3.2 Summary of SAWPA and Member/Contract Agency Permittees in Signiflrant Noncompliance(SNC),July 1—December 31,2016 91W111ewite6 Q=y Name Permit No. Reporting or Discharge violation None ARM Fbvnbm cornpany Name Permit No. Reporting or Discharge violation Node J13DPmeVfffi Company Name permit No. Reporting or Discharge Violation None S&VINDFamil compamName Permit No. b a DLscha Vkdatlon None Volley Dki iR Pemrgtees Cwnpay Name Permit No. Reporting or Discharge Valauon None SAWPA Pamla6 Corn Nance Permit No. M22MiN or DWOZ Violation None WA4M Pamillres carpvy Nure Permit No Reportm or Vior dW Decra Roofing Systems i1M) 1 Copper and Zinc 3.4 Future Projects that will Affect Quantity of Discharge to the Brine Line System None 3.5 SAWPA Special Projects SAWPA conducted the following Special Project efforts during the reporting period: 1. Maintenance of air release and vacuum relief valves on Reach V was the main focus for July so there were no Brine Line cleaning operations performed during the month. 2. The Pine Avenue siphon was cleaned in August. 3. Brine Line cleaning took place on Reach IV-A Upper from September through November 2016. 4. Flow tests were conducted during August, October, and November 2016. 5. Brine Line cleaning took place on Reach IWA Upper and Reach IV-B Upper to remove a scale obstruction. Special sampling was conducted at the SARI Metering Station (Canyon RV Park)for BOD and TSS and in Reach IV-B Upper to 3-36 determine effectiveness of the Vltec 4000 antiscalant. 6. Hydraulic capacity of Brine Line Reach IV-B Upper ranged from 1,120 to 1,200 gpm based on the flow tests performed. 3.6 Brine Wastewater Effluent Characteristics at OCSD's SARI Metering Station (SMS) A flow meter installed at the Orange County line measures SAWPRs discharge (SMS). For the six-month period from July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, a total of 1,960 MG was discharged into the Brine Line, for an average of 10.65 MGD. The SAWPA effluent represents a mixture of domestic and industrial Wastewater, industrial brine, and brine from brackish groundwater treated by the desalters. The flow meter/monitoring station at the Orange County line is sampled by SAWPA weekly for BOD,TSS, and hardness. Tables 3.3 and 3.4 show the mass of pollutants as they were measured at SMS. The data is based on average daily flow. The quarterly average numbers for mg/L and Ibs/day are flow-weighted values. TABLE 3.3-SAWPA DAILY AVERAGE CONCENTRATION(mg/L)AND MASS(lbs/day) MEASURED FROM WEEKLY SAMPLING AT OCSO'S GREEN RIVER METER, July-September 2016 SAWPA/Orange County Sanitation District July 16 August 16 September 16 Quarterly Average Average Daily 106756 11.0045 107007 10.7936 Fim In MGD PolruMnt MIL Worry MIL 16/0av MIL lb/da MIL Icy NSeNC 0.0063 0.5609 ND "' 0.0065 0.5801 0.0043 0.3841 CaOmWm NO "" ND "" NO "" ND "" ..-Chfoirium . . NO .... NO ..... NO .u. ND .... copper 0.0380 3.3833 0.0350 3.2122 6.6260 2.3203 0.0330 29706 ___ __..... .. Leatl ND "" NO "" NO ' "" ND "" _... ..__ Merary ND •••• ND ••,, No _ •,•• ND •••• . ..n. NiCk¢I ND '•'• ND •••' ...Xd ....... •'•• ND •••• Silver ND "" ND "" ND '. "" ND "" ZIDC 0.0440 3.9175 0.480 4.4053 0.0520 '. 4.6407 0.0480 4.3209 TObI Metals 0.0883 7.8618 0.0830 7.6175 0.0849 7.5411 0.0853 7.6756 BOD 45.3333 4,036.2344 46.2W0 4,2W.1257 44.2222 3,946.57M 45.4242 4,089.0357 TSs 132.2222 11,T/2.3503 132.6667 12,175.8300 164.4444 14,675.7128 141.2121 12,711.7455 NO =NM Detecte l =Ubs Day not Calculated dueto ConcenVation less than detedim little(typIW). 3-37 TABLE 3.4— SAWPA DAILYAVERAGE CONCQRRATION(mGL)AND MASS(lb /day) MEASURED FROM WEEKLY SAMPLING AT OCWS GREEN RIVER METER, October—December 2016 SAWPA/Orange Canty Sanitation Oistnct October 16 November 16 December 16 Owrtarly Avaraae -Average Dairy 105121 10.1909 99279 102103 Fbw in MGD pollutant n' /L lWdav m L lb/dav .01L IWdav -MIL IWd Arsenic 0.0056 8A930 i NO "" 0.0062 0.5139 0.0039 0.33C9 Cadmium NO ...:. _... Ne . .. NO .... NO - .... Chromium NO "" 0.U220 1.8698 NO "" 0.0073 0.620 copper 0.0300 2,6301 OMM 12291 O.N30 3.5603 0.0370 3.1507 _.LewJ NO .... NO .... NO .... No .... Mercury rvo .... Ne ..., Ne .... No .... Nbkel NO "" No "" NO "" NO "" SIVM NO •••• NO •••• NO •••• NO •••• zinc - - -0.wa - 4,2082 OcX0 4.M96 0.0wo C9V9 0.0W - 6.5983 Tool Maws e.m6 7.3n3 0.11" 9.6891 0.3092 9.0416 0.1023 83M SOD 4191V 3,262 330 59.6 5,01.1708 a.7500 5,6924029 P.3 " 4,V9.9Ml TSS 00.0000 13,250.6008 188.5926 16,028.mon 161.M17 14,9899M3 178.3651 15,188AM ND =NW Detected ^"=lbsOay not calculated We to concentration less than detection Im is(typical). 3-38 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE STATUS REPORT APPENDIX I 1st and 2nd Quarters FISCAL YEAR 2016/2017 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal Year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s)in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation 192M Holly St. 19200 Holly Street,LLC 1-581176 Huntington Beach, 211111 403S(d) 2 9 2 fA 92648 3M ESPE Dental Products Z-3713111 2111 McgawAve. Irvine,CA 92614 339114 471.11(a) 1 - 18330 Ward St. A&G Electropolish 1-531422 Fountain valley,CA 332813 433.17(a) 2 9 3 927M A&K Unburring and 20M S.Vale St.Unit TUmbliOg,INC. 1-511362 HSanta Ana,CA 332812 403.6(d) 2 9 2 927W 1198 N.Grove St. A&R Powder Coatin&Inc. 1-021088 Unit B Anaheim,CA 332812 433.17(a) 2 9 3 928% 56M Beach Blvd. Access Business Group,LLC 1-531435 Buena Park,CA 325412 439.47 2 6 5 90621 Accurate Circuit Engineering 1-011138 3019 Kllson Drive 334412 433.17(a) 2 9 9 Santa Ana,CA 92707 Active Plating,Inc. 1-031115 A Santa 1411 E.na,CA 92705 Pomona SC 332813 433.17(a) 2 13 9 ADS Gold,Inc. Z-321MI 3843 E.Eagle Drive 331410 433.17(a) - - - Anaheim,CA 92807 Advance Tech Platin&Inc. 1-021389 1061 N.Grove St Anaheim,CA 92806 332$13 433.1)(a) 2 10 3 Advanced Plating Technology Z-371321 1765 N.Batavia St. 332813 433.171a) 1 -Orange,CA 92865 Air Industries Company-A 71000hapman Ave. 1-031013 Garden Grove,CA 332722 403.5(d) 2 6 3 KC Company 92841 Air Industries Company,A 12570 Knorr St. PCC company 1-5314N Garden Grove,CA 332722 433.15(a),47L64(a),471.65(a) 2 17 23 92841-3932 Alex C.Fergusson 1-031186 8371 Monroe Ave.Stanton,CA 90680 32$611 417.166,61).176,41).36 2 $ ] 19065 Stewart St. Alexander 0il Company 1-581185 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.51d) 2 11 1 CA 92648 All Meals Processing of O.C., 1-031110 U015tandustdal St. 332813 433.17(a) 2 8 20 Inc Stanton,CA 90680 Alliance Medical Products, 1-541182 9342 Jeronimo Road 325412 439.47 2 4 5 Inc. Irvine,CA 92618 Page 1 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal Year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status lb NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s)in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation Allied Electronics Services, 1-0110)3 1342 E.Borchartl 334412 933.vp1 2 30 3 Inc, Santa Ana,CA 92705 Allied Pacific Metal Stamping 1-021111 2951 E.La Palma Ave. 403.5(d) 2 5 2 Anaheim,CA 92806 6550 Caballero BNd. 464.151a),464.15(b), Alloy Die Casting Co. 1531437 Buena Park,CA 464.15(c),464.15(h), 1 4 8 90620 464.45(a),4 1.45(b),464.15(d) Alloy Tech Electropolishing, 1-011036 22205.Huron Drlye 332812 433.171.) 2 6 3 Inc. Santa Ana,CA 92704 1755 S.Anaheim Alsco,Inc. 1-021656 9Iv1. Anaheim,CA 812331 403.5(d) 2 9 14 92WS 6400 Regio Ave. Class 1 Permit Alta Dena Certified Dairy,LLC 1-031083 Buena Park,CA 311520 403.51d) - - - De.dw ted 90620 Aluminum Forge-Div.of 1-071035 502 E.Mon Ave. Alum,Precision Santa Ana,CA 92707 332112 46>.46 2 8 10 Aluminum Precision Products, 1-511387 3323 W.Warner Ave. 332112 467.46 2 7 3 Inc.g3 Santa Ana,CA 927M Aluminum Precision Products, 1-011100 26215.Susan St. 332112 467.45,467.46 2 7 7 Inc.-Susan Soda Ana,CA 927M Aluminum Precision Products, 1-011038 3132 W.Central 332112 667.45 2 S 3 Inc.Central Sanb Ana,CA 927M American Apparel Knit and 12641 industry St. 1-531420 Garden Grove,CA 403.5(d) 2 3 10 Dye 92841 American Circuit Technology, 1-021149 5330 E.Hunter Ave. 334412 433.17(a) 2 9 3 Inc. Anaheim,CA 92807 Amerimax Building Products, 1-021102 1411 N.Daly St. 332812 465.35 1 4 - Inc. Anaheim,CA 92806 6965 Aragon Circle Ameripec,Inc. 1-031057 Buena Park,CA 312111 403.5(d) 2 4 12 W620 Ametek Aerospace,Inc. Z-361006 17032 Armrtmng CA 334511 433.3>(a) - - - Ave. Irylne, 13M&1340 N. Anaheim Extrusion Co.,Inc. 2-021168 Kraemer Blvd. 467.35 2 5 3 Anaheim CA92806 Page 2 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation Anchen Pharmaceuticals,Inc. 1-541180 72 Fairbanks Suite 325412 439.47 2 4 5 (Fairbanks) 150 Irvine,CA 92618 Anchen Pharmaceuticals,Inc. 1-5411]9 9603Jeronimo Rmd 325412 939.4] 2 4 4 Jeronimo Irvine,CA 92618 1055 Ortega Way Andres Technical Plating 1-521799 Unit C Placentia,CA 332813 433.17(a) 2 7 8 92870 Angelica Te#ile Services 1-600001 1575 H.ca.St. 812331 403.5(d) 2 3 1 Orange,CA 92867 Anodyne,Inc. 1�511389 2230 S.Susan St Santa Ana,CA92]04 332813 433.17(a) 2 31 35 Anomil Ent.Dba Danco Meal 1-011155 401 Rowland Santa 332813 433.17(a) 2 9 9 Surfacing Ana,CA 92707 Aqua-Con Company 1-011p66 1306 E.Pomona St.Santa Ana,CA 92705 403.5(d) 2 $ 2 433.15(a).433.17(a),467.46, 8005.State College 471.65(i),471.650),471.65(m), Arconic Global Fasteners& 471.65h),471.65(a), Rings,Inc. 1-Oz1081 Blvd Fullerton,CA 332722 471.65(p),471.65(q), 2 11 12 92831-5334 471.65(r).471.65(s), 471.65 w,471.65 ARO Service 1-021192 1186 N.Grove St. 336411 333.17(a) 2 9 3 Anaheim,CA 92806 Arrowhead Products 1-031137 4411 gatella Ave. Los 336413 433.17(a) 2 7 9 Corporation Alamitos,CA 90720 24855 Cubit Place Aseptic Technology,LLC 1-501002 Yorbo Linda,CA 31193 403.5(d) 2 5 6 92887 Astech Engineered Products, 1-571295 M30 Red Hill Ave. 336412 433.11(a) 2 10 9 Inc, Santa Ana,CA 92705 Astech Engineered Products, Z-371320 3030 Red Hill Ave. 336412 433.17(a) 1 - - Inc,8 2 Santa Ana,CA 92705 Auto-Chlor System of 1-511384 530 Goetz Ave. Santa 325611 417.166 2 9 3 Washin on,Inc. Ana,CA 92707 Aviation Equipment 1571 MacArthur Blvd. 1071037 Costa Me"A'A 336413 433.17(a) 2 9 3 Processing 92626 Avid Bioservices,Inc 1-571332 14191 Myford Road Tustin, 325414 439.27 2 1 J 1 2 CA 92780 Page 3 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal Year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status 40 NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation 17591 Sampson N. B&B Enameling,Inc. Z-331432 Huntington Beach, 332812 433.17)a) - - - CA 9264] B.Braun Medical,Inc.(East) 1-071054 2525 Mcgaw Ave. Irvine,CA 92614 325412 439.47,663.26,463.36 2 12 1 B.Braun Medical,Inc.(West) 1-541183 2525 Mcgaw Ave. Irvine,CA 92614 325412 439.47,463.26,463.36 2 30 - 11371 Monarch St. Basic Electronics,Inc. 1-031094 Garden Grove,CA 334412 433.1](a) 2 9 3 92841 127W Westem Ave. Ban Houston Co. 1-031010 Garden Grove,CA 403.5(d) - - 1 92841 Kraemer Beckman Coulter,Inc. 1521824 Brea,CA 92821as. A92921 Blvd. 334516 433.1](a) 2 8 3 Br rd Beo-Mag Plating 1-511370 Sale W.a,CA 92h Santa Ana,CA 700 332813 433.17(a) 2 8 15 Pla Bimbo Bakeries Usa,Inc. 1-521838 Place ta,CA is Ave. 311812 403.5(d) 2 4 2 Placentia,CA 928]0 1735 N. Black Oxide Industries,Inc. 1-021213 OrangMhorpe Park 332812 433.17(a) 2 8 30 Anaheim,CA 92801 5721 Casson Drive BLUE LAKE ENERGY 1-521785 Yarha Linda,CA 211111 403.5(d) 2 9 4 92886 7474 Garden Grove Bodycote Thermal Processing 14131120 Blvd. Wertminrter, 332811 403.5(d) 2 9 2 CA 92683 154M Graham St. Boeing Company(Graham) 1-111018 Huntington Beach, 33641 433.1](a) 2 8 3 CA 92649 Brasstech,Inc. 1-511368 3220 S.standard Ave. 332813 433.17(a1 2 9 3 Santa Ana,CA 92705 Brea Power II,LLC 1-521837 1935 Valencia Ave. 221112 403.5(d) 1 4 1 Brea,a 92823 2930 E.Frontera St. Bridgemark Corporation 1-521844 Unit A Anaheim,CA 211111 403.5(d) 2 9 4 92806 2221st 5t. Brindle/Thomas-Bradley 1531428 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 2 10 2 CA 92W Page 4 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal Year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status qW NAICS No. of Agency SMR Pollutant(s)in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation Brindle/Thomas-Brooks& 18462 Edwards St. Kohlbush 1-531429 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 2 10 2 CA 92648 Brindle/Thomas-Catalina& 188s15tewart St. Copeland 1-531430 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 2 10 2 CA 92648 Brindle/Thomas-Dabney& 19192 Stewart St. 1-531427 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 2 10 2 Patton CA 92648 433.15(a),433.17(a), 630 E.Lambert Road 467 36(c),472,34(dd), Bristol Industries 1-021226 Brea,CA 92821 332722 471.34(.),471.34(f), 2 10 17 471.34(i),471.34(r),471.34(s), 471.34(t),471.34(u),4I139(v) Burlington Engineering,Inc. 1-521770 220w.Grove Ave. 332811 433.17p) 2 9 2 Oran e,CA 92855 Cadillac Plating,Inc. 1-021062 1147 W.Struck Ave. 332813 433.12(a) 2 11 32 Zint Orange,CA 92867 15632 Container Ln. 413.14)c),413.14(g),413.24(c), Cal-Aurum Industries,Inc. 1-111089 Huntington Beach, 332813 413.24(g),413.54(b),413.54(f), 2 11 10 CN,CN..an. CA 92649 413.64(b),413.64(r,413.74(c), 413.74(g),433.17(a) 5271Argosy Califomia Faucets Z-331431 Huntington Beach, 332812 433.17(a) 1 - - CA 92649 California Gasket and Rubber 1-521832 533w.Collins Ave. 339991 428.65 2 6 2 Corporation Orate,CA 92867 Cargill,Inc. 1-01106) 600 N.Gilbert Fullerton,CA 9 28 33 311225 403.5(E) 2 4 6 Cartel Electronics 1-521814 1900 Petra Ln.Unit C Placentia,CA 92870 334412 433.17fal 2 10 11 Copper Catalina Cylinders,A Div.of 7300 Anaconda Ave. APP 1-MI021 Garden Grove,CA 467.46 2 8 4 92MI 12650westminater Cd Video,Inc. 1-511076 Are. GaNen Grove, 433.17(a) 2 9 3 CA 927062139 Central Powder Coating 1-021199 593 Explorer 5t Brea,CA 92821 332812 433.17(a) 2 12 3 CEO To Go,Inc. Z-321854 Anaheim,GA E.mIAI 93806 332813 433.17(a) 1 - - Anah Page 5 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division 621 aillill Fiscal Year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status NAILS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation Cherry Aerospace 1-513381 1224 E.Warner Ave.Santa Ana,CA 92705 332722 433.17(a),471.34(a),471.65(a) 2 13 12 . Chromadora,Inc. 1-sv 2515 s Birch St. 41a Santa Are,CA 92707 332813 433.171a1 2 8 9 Circuit Technology, 911 N.Main St. Inc.InC. 1-521821 Orange,CA 92865 334112 433.17(a) 2 11 3 Cirt¢Ch,Inc. 1-021133 250 E.Emerson Ave. 334112 433.17(a) 2 9 9 Orange,CA 92865 City of Anaheim-Public 6751 E.walnut 1-021073 Canyon Road 221310 403.5(d) 2 4 3 Utilities Dept Anaheim,CA 92807 City Of Anaheim-Public 1144 N.Kraemer Utilities Dept 1-521862 Blvd. Anaheim,CA 221112 403.5(d) 2 2 1 928M City of Anaheim Public 1.521843 2105.Anaheim Blvd.utilities 403.SId) 3 4 - Utllitle5 Anaheim,CA 92805 City of Huntington Beach Fire 19081 Burlington St. Department 1-111015 Huntington Reach, 211111 403.5(d) 2 8 7 CA 92648 City of Tustin-Maintenance 1472 Service Road Yard 1-071058 Tustin,CA 92780- 921190 4035(d) 1 S 7 200 City of Tustin Water Service 1-071023 U602 E.17th St. 221310 4033(d) - - - (17Th St.) Tuz[in,CA 92)OS City of Tustin,Water Service 1-0]1268 235 E.Main St 221310 403.5(d) 1 2 - (Main Sty Tustin,CA 92780 We State College q Foods Manufacturing Corp. 1-521849 Blvd. Fullerton,CA 311824 403.5(d) 1 3 - 92831 CLA-VAL Co.Div.of Griswold 1701 Placentia Ave. Z-361103 Costa Mesa,CA 332911 433.15(a) - - - Ind. 92627 5332 Commercial St. Coast to Coast Circuits,Inc. 1-111129 Huntington Beach, 334412 433.17(a) 2 10 9 CA 92649 7061 Patterson Drive Coastline Metal Finishing 1-531436 Garden Grove,CA 332813 433.17(a) 2 8 9 92841 Coca-Cola Company-Anaheim 2121 E.Winston Water Plant 1-021392 Read Anaheim,CA 312112 403.5(d) 1 3 1 928% Page 6 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal Year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s)in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation 4650 San Antonio Columbine Associates 1-5217M Road Direction E.on 211111 403.S(tl) 2 7 Q a St Yorba Linda,CA 92886 Continuous Coating 1-021290 520 W.Grove Ave. 332812 433.17(a),465.15 2 11 30 Corporation Orange,CA 92865 Cooper and Brain,Inc. 1-031070 1390 Site Drive Brea,CA 92821 211111 403.5(d) 2 6 9 0&G min. County of Orange OC Waste 20662 Newport Coast &fl¢cydipg 1-141003 Drive Newport 221117 403.5(d) 2 2 3 Coast,CA 92657 CP-Carrillo,Inc. 1-571316 1902 McGaw Ave. mare,CA 92614 336310 403.5(tl) 2 $ 2 3911 E.Mialoma CPPG,Inc. Z-321813 Ave. Anaheim,CA 332813 433.17(a) - - - 92806 CR&R,Inc. 1.531438 11292 Western Ave. Stanton,CA 90630 423930 4035(tl) 2 - 6 Crest Coating,Inc. 1-021289 1361S.AIlec SG Anaheim,CA 92805 332812 633.17(a) 2 9 3 Crh California Water,Inc. 1-011051 502 S.Lyon St. Santa Ana,CA 92701 561990 4035(tl) 2 4 2 18340 Mount Baldly Custom Enamelers,Inc. 1-021297 Circle Fountain 332812 433.17(a) 2 7 3 Valley,CA 92708 Cytec Engineered Materials, 1440 N.Kraemer Z-fio6005 Blvd. Anaheim,CA 325520 433.17(a) 1 - - Inc. 92806 Dee Shin Use,Inc. 1-031102 610 N.Gilbert St. 403.5(d) 1 4 12 Fullerton,CA92833 19242Stewart St. DAH oil,LLC 1-581373 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 2 5 3 CA 926U Darling International,Inc. 1-511378 2624 Hickory St 562219 403.5(tl) 2 6 4 Santa Ana,CA 92707 230 W.Blueridge Data Aire,Inc.42 1-021379 Ave. orange," 332322 433.17(a) 2 8 3 92865 Data Electronic Services,Inc. 1-011142 410 Nantucket Place Santa Ana,"92703 334412 433.17(a) 2 10 3 Data Solder,Inc. 1-521761 19'5Kilsono rive 334412 433.17(a) 2 8 3 Santa Ana, 9270] Page 7 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division �,`: Fiscal Year 2016-2017 List of SILIs with Monitoring&Compliance Status , NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s)in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation Dayton Flavors,LLC 1-WW38 5805.Melrose Atli 2 2 1 Placentia CA92870 53952 Richfield Road DeMino Assoc.,LLC 1-521845 Yorba Linda,CA 211111 401 1 - 1 92886 6370 Ahura Blvd, Derm Cosmetic tabs,Inc. 1-031062 Buena Park,CA 325611 417.166 2 11 3 W620 Dos Cuadras Offshore Res., 4541 Heil Ave. LLC 1-111013 Huntington Beach, 211111 401 2 6 9 G 92649 Dr.Smoothie Enterprises 1-531440 1730 Raymer Ave. 311930 403.51d) - - 2 Class l Permh Fullerton,CA 92833 Deactivated DG Smoothie Enterprises 1-NO131 1730Raymer Ave. 401 1 4 1 New Class Fullerton,CA 92833 Permit Issued DRS Sensors&Targeting 1-531QS 106M Valley view 334413 del 2 11 6 Systems,Inc. Cypress,CA 90630 CIS Waters of America,Inc. 11E 1522 N.Newhope St 312112 403.5(d) 2 5 2 anta Ana,U9x703 Ducommun Aerostructures, 1885 N.Batavia St 336413 433.17p) 2 8 14 Inc. Orange,CA 92965 Dunham Metal Processing 936 N.Parker St. 332813 433A7(a) 5 23 3 Chromium,Copper, Orange,CA 92867 Lead n St EFT Fast Duality Service,Inc. 232ta Ana, A92 334112 433.1]Ia) 2 9 3 Santa Ana, n St CA 9D04E ectro Metal Finishing 1194 N.Grove st 332812 433.v1a1 2 9 q Cor ration Anaheim,CA 92806Electrolurgy,Inc. 1121 Curves Ave. 332813 433.]](a) 2 9 34 cadmium Irvins,CA 9261413932 EnterpriseElectron Plating III,Inc. Drive Garden Grove, 332813 433.v(a) 2 12 9 A 92843 Electronic Precision 1-021337 537 Mercury La 332813 433.17(a) 2 7 9 Specialties,Inc. Brady CA 92821 Electronics:Products CA Products Co.,Inc. Z-321092 na3A98 332999 433.17(a) 1 - - Sunkist St. Energy Development Corp- 61316th St. Class 1 Permit CA 92648 Well 1-581383926Huntington Beach, 211111 aD3s(dl - - - Deam.•ated CA Energy Development Corp 202nd St. Class 1 Permit Ch.11(Aka SCOC) 1-111019 CA 926p648 on Beach, 211111 403.5(d) - - - Deactivated CA 2 Page 8 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal Year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s)in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation Excello Circuits 1-521855 1924 Narcna Circle 334412 433.17(a) 2 7 9 manufacturing Corp. Placentia,CA 92870 Expo Dyeing and Finishing, 2385 N.Knollwood 1-031322 Circle Anaheim,CA 403.5(d) 2 7 12 Inc. 92801 St Fabrica International,Inc. 1-01127E Sant S.Susana once,CA 92 700 314110 403.5(d) 2 4 3 Sant Fabrication Concepts 1800 E.Saint Andrew 1-011068 Place Santa Ana,CA 433.17(a) 2 7 3 Corporation 92705 Finellne Circuits& 1-021121 594AP011ost Brea, 334412 433.17(a) 2 12 3 Technology,Inc. CA 92821-3134 FMH Aerospace Corp DBA 1-571331 17072 Daimler St 332912 433.17(a) 2 7 34 PH,Silver FMH Corporation Isdre,CA92614 Fullerton Custom Works,Inc. Z-331424 1165 E.Eim Ave. 332813 4.33,17(a) 2 - - Fullerton,CA 92831 1230 E.Saint Gallade Chemical,Inc. 1-011257 Gertrude Place Santa 422690 403s(d) 2 5 2 PH Ana,CA 92707-3030 t. Gemini Industries,Inc. 1-071172 eau Pol Santa Ana,CA a,CA 92 705 331492 415.24 2 14 9 Gemtech Coatings 1-600149 2727 S.Gamsey St. 332812 433.17(a) 1 6 3 New class Santa Ana,CA 92707 Permit Issued 17892 Metzler Ln. Class 1 Permd Gomtech Industries,Inc. 1-531434 Huntington Beach, 332812 433.17(a) 1 3 1 Deactivated CA 92G47 General Container 5450 Dodds Ave. 1-031042 Buena Park,CA 322211 403.5(d) 2 5 2 Corporation %621 Georgia-Pacific Corrugated 63001teglo Ave. Class l Permit LLE 1-031200 Buena Park,CA 322211 4a3.5(d) 1 3 1 Deactivated 90620 12122 Western Ave. GKN Aerospace Transparency 1-53101 Garden Grove,CA 336413 403.5(d) 2 3 8 Systems 92841 990 N.Enterprise St. Gomtech Electronics,Inc. 1-021352 Unit L Orange,CA 334412 433.17(a) 2 9 3 92967 12361 Monarch St. Goodwin Company 1-031043 Garden Gr.,CA 325611 403.5(d) 2 8 8 92841 Page 9 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status NA ICS NO.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s)in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation 191M Gothard St. Gothard Street,LLC 1-581177 Huntington Beach, 211111 401 2 5 2 CA 92648 Graphic Packaging 260UBwrance International,Inc. 1-571314 Parkway Irvine,CA 322212 403.5(d) 2 5 2 926M Green Clean Water&Wage 1-52185] 1227 S.Claudine St $62219 43].4](b) 2 15 16 Titanium Services Anaheim,CA 92805 67M Caballem Blvd. Hanson-Loran Co.,Inc. 1-031107 Buena Park,CA 325612 417.166,417.176 2 15 3 90620 Harbor Truck Bodies,Inc. 1021286 255 voyager Ave. Brea,CA 92821 336370 433.171a1 2 11 9 1015 E. Harry's Dye&Wash,Inc. 1-5217" Orangethome Ave. 403.5(d) 2 8 6 Anaheim,CA 92801 Hartwell Corporation 1-021381 900 Richfield Road 332999 403.5(d) 2 9 2 Plarentia,CA 928]0 Hi Tech Solder 1-521790 700 Monroe Way 334412 433.17(e) 2 8 3 Capper Placentia,CA 92870 2090 N.Glassell Hightower Plating& 1-021185 Orange,CA 92865- 332813 433.17(a) 2 8 9 Manufacturing Co. 3911 413.14(c),413.14(g).413.24(ci 829 Production Place 413.24(g),413.44(c), Hinon Metal Finishing 1-061115 Newport Beach,CA 332813 413.44(g),413.54(c), 2 10 14 Chromium 92663 413.54(g),413.64(c), 413.64 ,433.17 a House Foods America 7351 orangewood 1-031072 Ave. Garden Grove, 311224 403.5(d) 2 5 12 Corporation CA 92941 Hyatt Die Casting& Z-331236 4656 Lincoln Ave. 464.15(a) 1 - - En ineering Corp. Cypress,CA W630 12W&1270 N.Blue Ideal Anodizin&Inc. 1-021041 Gum St. Anaheim, 332813 433.17(a) 2 10 3 CA 928M Ikon Powder Coating,Inc. 1-521756 1375 N.MiIler St Anaheim,CA 92806 332812 433.1](a) 2 8 3 1380 N.I(npllwood Image Technology,Inc. 1-521755 Circle Anaheim,CA 325613 417.86 2 9 3 92801 Page 10 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal Year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status qW NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s)in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation 2007 Farmer Ave. Imperial Plating 1-031106 suite N&o 332813 433.17(a) 2 11 29 Fullerton,CA 92833 2502 Barranca Imuraya Use,Inc. 1-541178 Parkway Irvine,CA 311520 4o3.5(d) 2 6 2 92506 Independent Forge Company 1-021401 692 N.Batavia St Orange,CA 92868 1 332112 467.45 2 8 3 Industrial Metal Finishing,Inc. 1-521829 1941 Petra Un. 332813 103.5(d) 2 7 2 Placentia,CA 92870 Intec Products,Inc. 1.021399 1145 N.Grove St 403.5(d) 2 7 2 Anaheim,CA 92806 6485 Descznso Ave. International Paper 1-531419 Buena Park,CA 322224 403.5(d) 2 4 2 90520 6211 Descanso Ave. international Paper N3 1-031171 Buena Park,CA 322211 403.5(d) 2 4 3 W620 International Paper Company 1-521820 fi01 Ban Read 322211 4o3.5(d) 2 10 2 Anaheim,CA 92805 Irvine Ranch Water District 1-571327 1221 Edinger Ave. Tustin,CA 92780 221310 403.5(d) 2 14 1 Irvine Ranch Water District- 1-011075 1704W.Segerstrum 221310 4o3s(d) - - Data Santa Ana,CA 92704 3001 Red Hnl Ave. Irvine Sensors Corporation 1-571328 Unit 3109 Costa 469.18(a) 1 5 - Mesa,CA 92626 1&R Metal Finishing Co. 1-521823 307 N.Euclid Way 332812 4o3s1d1 2 6 3 Anaheim,CA 92801 1&1 MARIN E AQUISITION5, 151 Shipyard Way LLC 1-551152 Unit? Newport 336611 1033(d) 2 8 3 Copper Beach,CA 92663 4311 Jamboree Read Jazz Semiconductor 1-571292 Neuquen Beach,C , 334413 469.18(a) 2 9 - 92660 JD Processing 1-511407 2220 Cape Cod Way 332813 433.17(a) 2 7 9 Santa Ana,CA 92703 1ellco Container,Inc. 1-021402 1151 N.Tustin Ave. 322212 403.5(tl) 2 5 3 Anaheim,CA 9280) 18701 Edwards St. John A.Thomas-Bolsa Oil 1-031065 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 2 10 6 CA 92648 Page 11 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal Year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s)in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation orangewood Gate, Joint Forces Training Base,Los 1-031270 Northwest Corner of 928110 403.5(d) 2 8 1 Alamitos the Base Los Alamitos,CA 90720 Kanstul Musical Instruments Z-321800 1332 Claudine St. 339992 433.17(a) - - - Anaheim,CA92B05 11691 Coley River Kenlen Specialities,Inc. 1-021171 circle Fountain 332812 433.17(a) 2 2 3 Vail",CA 92708 Kimberly Clark Worldwide 2001 E. 1-021425 Orangetbarpe 322121 43OA2 2 16 12 Inc.,Fullerton Mill Fullerton,CA 9201 Kinsbursky Brothers Supply, 1314 N.Anaheim 1-021424 Blvd. Anaheim,CA 562211 403.5(d) 2 6 2 Inc. 92801 Kirkhill TA Company(North) 1-021426 WOE.A 92821 C'Press 5s Brea,C . 339991 428.76 2 12 2 Kirkhill TA Company(South) 1-02105E 300 E.Cypress St Brea,CA 92821 . 339991 428.76 2 12 2 Kryler Corporation 1-021428 1217F.Ash Ave. 332813 413.14(b),413.14I0,433.17(a) 2 13 9 Fullerton,CA 92891 3565CadhRec Ave. Kyocera Precision Tools Inc. 1-511385 Costa Mesa,CA 333515 403.5(d) 2 5 2 92626 La Habra Bakery 1-033029 850 S.Cypress La Habra,CA Not 311812 403.5(tl) 2 $ 6 W Habra Plating Co.,Inc. Z-331399 900 S.Cypress La 332813 a33.v(a) 1 - - Habra,CA 90631 5285.Central Park Linco Industries,Inc. 1-021253 Ave.Direction West 332812 4o3.5(d) 2 9 2 Anaheim,CA 92802 Linn Energy 1-521808 27"Valencia Ave. 211111 403.5(d) 2 14 12 Brea,CA 92821 LM Chrome Corporation 1-5113611654 young St. 'a our 332813 433.1](a) 2 13 14 Ana,CA 92705 17592 Metzler Le. Logi Graphics,Inc. 1-031049 Huntington Beach, 334412 433.17(a) 2 9 1 Copper CA 9264] tSW Enterprises,LLC 1-521863 1215 N.Grave St. 562219 4035(d) 2 1 2 Anaheim,CA 92806 Page 12 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status Pollutant(s) in Facility Name Permit No. Address NAILS Regulation No.of Agency SMR Discharge Comment Code Inspections Samples Samples Violation 5322 Mcradden Ave. M.S.Bellows 1-111007 Herrington Beach, 332813 433.17lal 2 7 3 CA 92649 2294 N.Mervia St, Magma Finishing Corp. Z-321810 Suite D orange,CA 332813 433.17(a) 1 - - 92865 2475 W.W Palma Magnetic Metals Corporation 1-531391 Ave. Anaheim,CA 335311 433.17(a) 2 8 3 92901 Manufactured Packaging 1-521793 3200 Enterprise St 322211 4p3.5(dl 1 6 1 Products Brea,CA 92821 Manufactured Packaging 1-021601 1901 E.Rosslynn Ave. 322211 403.5(dl 2 4 2 Products(MPP Fullerton) Fullerton,CA 92831 1111 E.Mcfadden Markland Manufacturing,Inc. 1-011046 Ave. Sams Ana,u 332813 433.17(a) 2 15 14 92705 Maruchan,Inc,(Deere) 1-071024 1902 Deere Ave. 311824 403.5(d) 2 5 2 Irvine,CA 926M 158M Laguna Maruchan,Inc.(Laguna Cyn) 1-141015 Canyon Road Irvine, 311824 403.5(d) - 2 - CA92618 Mamkome Use,Inc. 1-141023 17132 PUIIman St Irvine,CA 92614 311991 403.5(d) 4 1$ 2 PH Master Wash,Inc. 1-511399 3120 Nilson St. Santa Ana,CA 92707 811192 403.5(d) 2 5 2 1601 E. Mckenna Labs,Inc. 1-021422 Oraugethmpe Ave. 325620 417.86 2 8 3 Fullerton,CA 92831 MCP Foods,Inc. 1-021029 4245. m,CA son St Anaheim,CA 92805 311942 403.5(d) 2 5 12 Medvonlc Heart Valves,Inc. 1-071051 1851 E.Deere Ave.Santa Ana,CA 92705 334510 W3.5(d) 2 7 2 Marked,Inc. 1-521840 233 E.Bristpl Ln.Oran e,CA 92865 325412 439.47 2 $ 6 1350 Gisler Ave. Mesa Water District 1-061007 Costa Mesa,CA 221310 1015(d) 2 5 3 92626 Mlcrometals,Inc. 1-021153 Anaheim, Palma Ave,CA 9280] . 334416 433.I7(a) 2 9 3 Page 13 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal Year 2016-2017 List of SILIs with Monitoring&Compliance Status NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s)in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation 11652 Mayon Drive Microsemi Corporation 1-032091 Garden Grove,CA 334413 469.16(a) _ - Class l Permit 92841 OeaRivated Mumetta Circuits 1-521811 5000 E.Landon St.Anaheim,CA 92807 334412 433.1)(a) 2 10 3 Nalco Cal Water,LLC 1-521746 1961 Petra to 561990 403.5(d) 2 8 2 Pheentia,CA 92870 73660rangewoatl Nbty Acquisition L.L.C. 1-531410 Ave. Garden Grove, 325412 439.47 2 9 4 CA 92841 Neutron Plating,Inc. Z-321812 2993E.Blue star St Anaheim,CA 92806 1 332812 433.17(a) 1 - - Neutronic Stamping and 10535 Lawson River 1-521772 Ave. F...We Vall", 334417 433.17(a) 1 7 4 Plating CA 927D8 Newport Corporation 1-073038 1791 Deere Ave. 334516 403.5(d) 2 B 1 Irvine,CA 92606 22725 Smil Ranch Nobel Biocare USA,LLC 1-521801 Parkway Yonne 339114 433.17(a) 2 B 3 Linda,CA 92887 Nor-Cal Beverage Co.,Inc. 1-OZ128¢ 1226 N.Olive St 312111 403.5(tll 2 S 12 (Main) Anaheim,CA 92801 Nor-Cal Beverage Co.,Inc 1-021283 1226 N.Olive St 312111 403.5(d) 2 5 12 (NCB) Anaheim,CA 92WI Nu-Tec Powder Coating 2-321383 2990E.Blue star St 332812 a33.IJ(a) 1 - Anaheim,CA92806 7800 Palm Circle O'Donnell Oil Company,LLC 1-581191 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 2 11 2 CA 92648 20661 Newport Coast O.C.Waste&Recycling 1-141018 Drive Newport 562910 4o3S(d) 2 9 1 Beach,C,92657 Oakley,Inc. 1-141012 11con Foothill 339115 403.5(d) 2 3 - Perth,CA 92610 11665 Coley River Omni Metal Finishing,Inc. 1-021520 Crdd Fountain 332813 433.17(a) 2 7 9 Valid ,CA 92708 4263 Birch St.Suite B Class 1 PermR Only Cremations for Pets 1-600125 Newport Mach,CA 403.5(d) 2 2 1 OeacOvatetl 926W Orange County Plating Co., 1-021535 956 N.Parker St 332813 433.17(a) 2 11 9 Inc. Orange,CA 92867 Page 14 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation 03 E.Alton Ave. Pacifc Chrome Services x-311396 Suite F Santa Ana,CA 332813 433.17(a) 2 - - 92705 Pacific Image Technology,Inc. 1- Anaheim021070 18)SSmanta Crux,CA 92805% 334112 433.17(.) 1 5 3 Pacific Western Container 1-511371 4044 W.Gany Ave. 322212 403.5(d) 2 5 2 Santa Ana,CA 927M Paramount Chrome Plating. 1-511415 2310 rape tad way 332813 433.17(a) 3 11 7 chromium,copper, Inc. Santa Ana,CA 92703 NickaCbm, 143W Alton Parkway Parker Hannifin Corporation 1-141002 Irvine,CA 92618- 332912 403.5(d) 2 10 3 1898 Patio and poor Outlet,Inc. 1-521783 410 aFletcher Ave. Ora ,CA 92865 332812 433.17(a) 2 12 3 Patriot Wastewater.LLC 1E00147 314 W.Freedom Aim. 562219 403.51d) 1 New Class (Freedom Non-OAR orange,CA 92865 Permit Issued Patriot Wastewater,LLC 1-521861 314 W.Freedom Ave. $62219 43za)lb) 2 28 30 (Freedom) Orange,U92865 Patriot Wastewater,LLC 2840 E.Mlral.ma 1-640009 Ave. Anaheim,CA 437A)(b) 2 25 - (MiralomaCWT) 9280E Patriot Wastewater,LLC 2840 E.Miraloma 1-600013 Ave. Anaheim,CA 403.5(d) 2 11 8 (Miraloma Non-CWT) 9280E 6261 Caballero BIM, Pepsi-Cola Bottling Group 1-031295 Buena Park,CA 312111 403.5(d) 2 4 12 90620 Performance Powder,Inc. 1-sxleo5 2920 E Le Jolla St 332$12 433.17(a) 2 9 3 Anaheim,CA 9280E 31920th St. Petroprize Corporation 1-591180 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 1 4 2 CA 92648 2012nd St. Pier Oil Company,Inc. 1-581178 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 2 8 2 CA 92648 Pioneer Circuits 1-011262 30105.Shannon St. 334412 433.17(a) 2 11 9 Santa Ana,CA 927M 1179 N.Fountain Platinum Surface Coatin&Inc. 1521852 Jway Anaheim,CA 332813 433.17(a) 2 11 4 9280E Page 15 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status 40 NAILS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant)s)in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation Plegel Oil Company(Blattner- 16801 Rumson St. 1-011176 yorba Linda,CA 211111 403.5(d) 2 5 12 A.H.A.) 92886 Plegel Oil Company,Inc. 1-521864 Mammoth Way 211111 403.5(d) 2 9 2 Placentia.CA 92870 514S Rose Porter Powder Coating Z-322817 Anaheim C Anaheim, 332813 433.17(a) - - - naM1ei 307 N.Euclid Way Class 1 Permit POWtlercoat Services,Inc.pl 1-0Z39z Anaheim,CA 92801 332812 433.1](a) 1 2 1 Deactivated Powdermat Services,Inc.#3 1-021569 237 N.Euclid Way 332812 433.17(a) 1 1 1 Class l Permit Anaheim,CA 92W1 Deactivated PowderCOeL Services,LLC- I-600167 307 N.Euclid Way 337812 433.17(a) 1 2 2 New Cia551 Building E Anaheim,CA 92801 Permit Issued PowderCoat Services,LLC- 1 fi00168 237 N.Euclid Way 43317(a) 1 - 2 New Class 1 BuildingJ Anaheim,CA 92801 Permit Issued 4011 W.Carriage Power Distribution,Inc. 1-511" Drive Santa Ana,CA 335311 403.5(d) 2 7 3 927M Precious Metals Platingyenta Ana,C 1-011265 x6350na,CA 92707 Ave. 332813 433.17(a) 2 15 3 Precision Anodizing&Plating, i-621809 1601N.Miller St. 332813 433.17(a) 2 13 30 Inc, Anaheim,CA 92806 3310 W.HarWuJ St. Precision Circuits West,Inc. 1-011008 Santa Ana,CA 927o 334412 433.17(a) 2 8 3 3920 Precision Resource,California 5803 Engineer St. 1-111002 HuminlMn Math, 332710 403.5(d) 2 12 2 Division CA 92649 Precon,Inc. 1-021581 3131 E.La Palma Ave. Anaheim,CA 92806 332710 403.5(d) 2 10 10 6237 Desranfo Orde Primatex Industries,Inc. 1-031036 Buena Park,CA 403.5(d) 2 5 2 90620 Prudential Overall Supply 1-071235 16903Aston St. 812332 4o3.5(d) 2 14 16 Irvine,CA 92606 Pulmuone Wildwood,Inc. 1-531397 2325 Moore Ave. 311991 403.5(d) 3 6 2 Fullerton,CA 92833 Quality Aluminum Forge 1-521833 "N.Cypress St 332112 467.45 2 14 4 (Cypress) Orange,CA 92867 Page 16 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutants) in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation Quality Aluminum Forge 1-5218M 820N.Lemon St 332112 467.46 2 13 4 (Lemon) orange,CA 92857 Quikturn Professional 1-521858 567 S.Melrose St. 403.5(d) 2 10 12 Sareerprinting Placentia,CA 92870 864 W.18th St. Ralimakers,Inc. 1-061138 Costa Mesa,CA 332323 t33.17(.) 2 6 4 92627 17835 Sky Park Grole Payne Dealership Corporation 1-571303 suite lrvNe,CA 454390 403.5(d) 2 7 1 92614 RISC Transport Dynamics 3131 W.Segerstrom Chromium,Nickel, 3-011013 Ave. Santa Ana,CA 336413 433.17(a) 2 8 3 Zinc Corp. 927N 3110 W.Harvard St. Reid Metal Finishing 1-511376 Unit 145anta Ana, 332813 433.17(a) 2 11 13 CA 927n4 2191st St. Remora Operating CA,LLC 1-581192 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 2 8 1 CA 926" Republic Waste Services 1-521927 2727 Coronado SC 56211 403.5(d) 2 6 1 Anaheim,CA 92806 Republic Waste Services of 1-021169 2235 N.Blue Gum St. 562111 403.5(d) 2 $ 1 So.Cal.,LLC Anaheim,CA92806 3401W.Segentram Rich Products Corp. 1-511404 Ave. Santa Ana,CA 311812 403.5(d) 2 4 2 927N Ricoh Electronics,Inc. 1-571326 1100 Valencia Ave.Tuz[in,CA 92780 332812 433.17(a) 2 10 8 Rigid-Flex Plus 1-521856 (lane,CA 334412 433.17(a) 2 11 2 Gross Orange,CA 9286) Rigiflex Technology,Inc. 1-021187 1166N.Anaheim,CA A 9St2806 334412 433.17(a) 1 10 3 Gol CA 92870 ROBERT I.ADAMS 1-021094 P PacPlacardsClacard Ave. 211111 403.5(d) 2 $ 7 Robinson Pharma,Inc. 1-511413 2632S.Oddity Way 32$412 439.W 2 9 8 (Crud ) Santa Ana,CA 92704 Robinson Ph...,Inc. 1-511412 3330 S.Harbor Blvd. 32$412 43947 2 13 6 (Harbor South Santa Ana,CA 92704 Robinson Pharma,Inc. 1-511416 2626 Shannon St. 325412 439.4] 2 11 6 (Shannon) Santa Ana,CA 927N Page 17 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation Rolls-Royce HTC 1-600212 5730 Katella Ave. 541712 403 5(d) _ _ _ New Class 1 Cypress,CA90630 Permit issued Rolls-Royce HTC(fume 1-600213 5730 Katella Ave. 541712 403.5(d) New Class 1 scrubber) Cypress,CA90630 Permitlssued 712 N.Valley St.Unit Roto-Die Company,Inc. 1-021D33 A&B Anaheim,G 811310 43317(a) 2 10 3 92801 11414th St.Lot/ Rountree/Wright 1-111028 Block 12&14/113 211111 403.5(d) 2 10 7 Enterprises,LLC Huntington Beach, G 92648 Royalty Carpet Mills,Inc. 1-071240 17352 Derian Ave.hvine,CA 92610 314110 403.5Idl 1 2 - 18742 Goldenwest S&C Oil Co.,Inc. 1-581175 St. Huntington 211111 403.5o) 3 12 2 Beach,G 92649 3184 Pullman St. Safran Electronics&Defense, 1-5713M Costa Mesa,CA 335931 433.17(a) 2 9 3 silver Avionics USA,U.C. 92626 2955 Aimay Ave. Sanmina Corporation(Aumay) 1-061008 Costa Mese,CA 334412 433.1>(a) 2 10 9 92626 2950 Red Hill Ave. Sanmina Corporation(Redhill) 1-061009 Costa Mese,CA 334412 433.17(a) 2 10 9 Copper 92626 Santa Ana Aviation Systems 1-571312 2036 E.over Road 336413 433.111a) 2 10 $ Class l Permit LLC. Santa Ana,G 92J05 Deactivated Santana Services 1-021016 1124ton,CAve. 332813 433.17(a) 2 8 2 Fullertan,G93831 Schreiber Foods,Inc. 1-021049 1901ton Burt on 311511 403.5fd) 2 4 12 Fullertan,G92831 Scientific Spray Finishes,Inc. 1-031311 3155.Richman Ave. 332812 433.1J(a) 2 4 3 Fullerton,G 92832 333 Mcmrmick Ave. Semites 1-571313 Costa Mesa,G 334413 469.18(a) 2 6 5 92626 Serrano Water District 1021137 5454 Taft Ave. 221310 403shn 2 - 5 Orenge,G928fiJ SFPP,LP 1021619 13W N.Main St. 493190 403.SId) 2 4 - Orenge,G928fiJ Shepard Bros.,Inc. 1-MI034 5035.Cypress St. La 325612 417.166,417.176 2 9 2 Habra,G 90631 Page 18 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal Year 2016-2017 List of SILIs with Monitoring&Compliance Status 16 NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation 6535 Caballero Bivd. Simply Fresh Foods,Inc. 1-531426 Building C Buena 311421 403.5(d) 2 5 6 Park,CA 90520 17905 Metder Ln. Soldermask,Inc. 1-031341 Huntington Beach, 334412 433.17(a) 1 7 3 rA 92647 South Bay Chrome 1-5113H Santa Ana, CA Ave. 332813 433.17(a) 2 1$ 14 Santa Ana,CA 9ZJ05 3524 W.lake Center South Coast Chr its#2 1.011054 Calve Unit A Santa 334412 433.17(a) 1 3 - Ana CA 927N 35M W.Una center South Coast Circuits#3 1-011069 Drive Unit A Santa 334412 433.17(a) 2 6 9 Ana,CA 92704 3512 W.take Center South Coast Circuits#4 1-511365 Drive Unit A Santa 334412 433.17(a) 2 7 9 Ana CA 927N 3506 Lake Center South Coast Circuits,Inc. 1-01I030 Drive suite A Santa 334412 433.17(a) 2 9 3 Ana,CA 927W South Coast Water 1-511405 401 S.Santa Fe St. 403.5(d) 1 6 2 Santa Ana,CA 92705 Southern California Edison#1 7301 Fenwick Lin. (Mt) 1n31014 WestinOnler,CA 811310 403.5(d) 2 6 9 92683 Southern California Edison#2 7351 Fenwick Ln. (Das) 1-031015 Westminster,CA 811310 103.5(d) 2 6 9 92683 Southern California Edison#3 7455 Fenwick Ln. (ors) 1A 1916 Westminster,a 811310 403.5(d) 2 26 9 92683 Southern California Edison#4 7400 Fenwick ln. IMss) 1-031020 Westminster,CA 811310 403.5(d) - - 9 92683 Spectrum Paint And Powder, Z-321822 1332 S.Allec Sc 332812 433.17(a) 1 - - Inc. Anaheim,CA 92WS SPS Technologies 1-011310 27015.Harbor Blvd, 332722 433.3]la),471341a) 2 16 19 Santa Ana,CA 927N St.John Knits,Inc. 1-071158 37422 Cenan Ave.Irvine,CA 93634 313310 403.5(4) 2 5 - Stainless Micro-Polish,Inc. 1-021672 1206 N.Grove St 332813 433.17(a) 2 10 4 Anaheim,CA 92806 Page 19 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division AML Fiscal year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation 7601 Park Ave. Star Powder Coating,Inc. 1-531425 Garden Grove,CA 332812 433.17(a) 2 8 7 92841 Stanek Corporation 1-021660 512 N.Main St. 334419 433.17(a),469.26(a) 2 9 2 New Class Orange,CA 92868 Permit Issued 1449 W.Orange Statek Corporation 42 1-522777 Grove Ave.Unit 334419 469.28(a) 1 - - Oran e,CA 92868 New Zero Statek Corporation Z-600201 512 N.Main St. 433.17(a) - _ _ Discharge (Gold/Nickel Plating) orange,CA 92868 Certification Issued Stepan Company 1-021674 Anahei partm,CA 9x801 325613 417,106,417.96 2 9 2 naM1 Q02 Westminster Stremicks Heritage Foods,LLC 1-021028 Ave. Santa Ana,CA 311511 4033(d) 2 4 - 92703-1310 Strip Clean Company Z-321673 5105W.1st5[. Santa 332812 433.17(a) 2 - - Ana,CA 92703 Summit Interconnect,Inc. 1-600012 223 N.Crescent Way 433.17(a) 2 10 8 Anaheim,CA 92901 Summit Interconnect,Inc., 115(cow 230 W.Bristol Ln. 334412 433.17(a) - - - Orange Division orange,CA 92865 naheim,CA 928W Sunny Delight Beverages Co. 1-0ll045 A Tustin Ave. 312111 403.5(d) 2 5 10 Anah Superior Plating 1-021M Anal A 92280Ave. Anaheim,CA 5 332813 433.17(a) 2 12 9 Superior Processing 1-021403 ll15 Las,CA 9 Placentia,CA 2e70 334412 433.171a) 2 10 3 Tayco Engineering,Inc. 1-031012 l0S74 Hope St Cypress,CA W630 334513 433.17(a) 2 7 3 TaylorDunn Manufacturing 1-021123 2114 Ball Road 333924 433.17(a) 2 8 8 Company Anaheim,CA 928M TC Cosmotronic,Inc.,DBA ]571309 16721 Noyes Ave. 334412 433.1]la) 2 13 9 Cosmotronic Irvine,CA 92606 1571 S.Sunkist St. Techplate,Inc. 1-021082 suite H Anaheim,CA 332813 433.17(a) 2 4 2 92806 Teva Parenteral Medicines, 1-141007 19 Hughes Irvine,G 325412 439.47 2 3 5 Inc. 92618 Thermal-Vac Technology,Inc 1-021282 1221 W.struck Ave. 332410 433.17(a) 2 9 9 Oran e,CA92B67 Page 20 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples Discharge Comment Violation Thompson Energy Resources, 1-521773 3351 E.Birch St. 211111 403.5(d) 2 14 6 LLC Brea,CA92821-6251 Timken Bearing Inspection, 4422 Corporate 1-531415 Center Drive Los 336412 403.5(d) 2 8 1 Inc' Alamitos,CA 90720 15701 Industry ln. Morita Company,Inc. 1-111132 Huntington Mach, 332813 433.17(a) 2 9 9 CA 92649 Todds,A Division of M Heinz, 1-071056 rHh hite Road 311941 403.5(d) 2 5 - LLC CA 92614 Toyota Racing Development 1-071059 ker St. Costa 403.5(d) 2 15 15 CA 92626 .Technology Transline Technology,Inc. 1-021202 Anaheim,CA 334412 433.17(a) 2 9 4 Triumph Processing-Embee 1-511403 .Hathaway SL 332813 433.1J(a) 2 2D 7 Div(Plate) Ana,CA 93J05 Triumph Processing-Embee 1-511402 ,Hathaway St 332813 433.1J(aj 2 19 7 Div.(Anodize) Ana,CA 92J05 Tropitone Furniture Co.,Inc. 1-141163 92618 i Irvine,CA 337124 433.17(a) 2 9 3 2618 TTM Technologies gl 1-511366 2645 Croddy way Santa Ana,CA 92704 334412 433.17(a) 2 12 9 TTM Technologies,Inc. 1-511359 26405.Harbor Blvd. Santa Ana,CA 92700 334412 433.17(a) 2 it 9 Ultra-Pure Metal Finishin& 1.021703 1764N Case St 332813 433.17(a) 2 11 9 Zinc Inc. Orange,CA 92865 United Pharma,LLC 1-531410 2312 Moore Ave. 325412 403.5(d) - Q Fullerton,CA 92833 Universal Alloy Corp. 1-021706 2871W Mesa Ave. 467.35 2 5 3 Anaheim,CA 928M 1551 E. Universal Molding Co. 1-521836 Orangethorpe Ave. 332812 433.17(a) 2 18 4 Fullerton,CA 92831 21M E. UOP,LLC 1-521751 Orangethorpe Ave. 326113 403.5(d) 2 5 1 Anaheim,CA 92806 Van Law Food Products,Inc. 1-531439 2325 Moore Ave. Fullerton,CA 92833 311941 403.5(tl) 2 2 12 Veeto Electro Fab,Inc. 1021166 1176 N.Osprey Circle Anaheim,CA 92807 334412 433.17(a) 2 8 3 Page 21 of 22 Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Fiscal Year 2016-2017 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status NAICSPollutant(s)in Facility Name Permit No. Address Code Inspections Agency SMR Regulation No. ons Samples Samples Discharge Comment Code Violation Vi-Cal Metals,Inc. 1-521U6 140ON.Barter St.Anaheim,CA 92806 562920 403.51tl1 2 6 2 Viasystems Technologies 1-521859 3140E.Comnado St. 334412 433.17(.) 2 7 11 COPoer Corporation,LLC Anaheim,CA 92806 Vit-Best Nutrition,Inc. 1-600010 28320.Ave. 439.47 2 4 1 Tustin,CA 927M New Zero Weartech Z-WO242 1177 N.G'ove St. 333992 433.17(a) _ - _ Discharge Anaheim,U92806 Certltl4etion Issued Weber Precision Graphics 1-011354 2730 Shannon St Santa Ana,CA 92700 323113 403.5(d) 2 4 2 Weidemann Water 1702 E.Rosslynn Ave. Conditioners,Inc. 1-021653 Fullerton,CA 9201- 333318 403.5(d) 2 6 2 5111 SOW W.IAh St. West Newport Oil Company 1-052110 Costa Mesa,CA 211111 4o3.5(d) 2 11 18 92627 Western Yam Dyeing,Inc. 1-031114 2011 Raymer Ave. 4p3.5(d) 2 8 6 Fullerton,CA 92833 Wiles-Placentia Oil Operator, 1521829 550 Richfield Road 211111 403.5(d) 2 6 2 LLC Placentia,CA 92870 Winonics lBred) 1-031035 660 N.Puente St Brea,CA 92KI 334412 433.1)(a) 2 9 9 1257 State College WinoniCs.InC. 1-021735 Blvd. Fullerton,CA 334412 433.17(a) 2 7 9 92831 17235 Newhape St. VAKULT USA INC. 1-5218W Fountain valley,CA 311511 403.5(d) 2 4 5 927W Page 22 of 22 ww owwumy ncµ,u ragc ur i� Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District - Plant 1 Facility ARB ID: 100255 Facility Reporting Year: 2016 Confidential Data Indication Set to "No" by Reporter Certification Statement: The designated representative or alternate designated representative must sign (i.e., agree to) this certification statement. If you are an agent and you click on 'SUBMIT', you are not agreeing to the certification statement, but are submitting the certification statement on behalf of the designated representative or alternate designated representative who is agreeing to the certification statement. An agent is only authorized to make the electronic submission on behalf of the designated representative, not to sign (i.e., agree to) the certification statement. Facility Representatives Agent: Corey Luth Agent: Joseph Steiner Alternate Designated randa abushaban Representative: Designated Representative: Lisa Rothbart Facility Location Physical Address: 10844 Ellis Avenue City: Fountain Valley State/ Province: CA ZIP/ Postal Code: 92708 Country: Latitude: 33.69404 Longitude: -117.93807 County: ORANGE Air Basin: SOUTH COAST District: SOUTH COAST AQMD Mailing Address: 10844 Ellis Avenue City: Fountain Valley State / Province: CA ZIP/ Postal Code: 92708 Country: Payment Information (required if subject to AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee Regulation) Responsible Party for Payment: Responsible Party Email: Responsible Party Phone: Billing Address: City: State / Province: https://ssl.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=12584 4/10/2017 unu aummary meport rugc c ui W ZIP/ Postal Code: Country: Owners / Operators GHG Quantity CO2 equivalent emissions, excluding 3,291.916194 Metric Tons blogenic (subparts C - AA): Exempt blogenic CO2 emissions 21,915.529 Metric Tons (subparts C - AA): CO2 equivalent emissions from fuel 0 Metric Tons supplier categories, excluding blogenic (subparts MM - NN): Exempt blogenic CO2 emissions 0 Metric Tons from fuel supplier categories (subparts MM - NN): CO2 emissions from CO2 Suppliers 0 Metric Tons (excluding blogenic) (subpart PP): Exempt biogenic CO2 emissions 0 Metric Tons from CO2 Suppliers (subpart PP): CO2 equivalent emissions from 0 Metric Tons electric power entities: Covered CO2 equivalent emissions: 3,291.916194 Metric Tons De Mlnlmis CO2 equivalent 0 Metric Tons emissions: Maximum allowable De Mlnimis 756.223356 Metric Tons emissions: General Facility Reportina Information NAICS Codes Primary: 221320 (Sewage Treatment Facilities) Second Primary: Additional: U.S. Parent Companies Parent Company Name: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT(OCSD) Address: 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 Percentage of Ownership Interest: 100% GHG Report Start Date: 2016-01-01 GHG Report End Date: 2016-12-31 Explanation of any calculation methodology changes during the reporting year: EPA a-GGRT Facility IDs Full or Abbreviated GHG Report: Full Company or Entity qualifies for No Small Business Status: https://ssl.arb.ca.gov/CalcGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=l2584 4/10/2017 ..hv .,w.....w� ..vyv.. rage J oI 13 Are you applying for legacy contract No transition assistance under the cap- and-trade program 195894]?: Flectririly Ptrchases/AcaUisitlons for ReDortina Facilities (95104(dll Electricity Provider's Name: Southern California Edison (SCE) Provider's ARB ID: 3005 Purchases/Acquisitions (MWh): 40,752 Natural Gas Purchases/Acquisitions for Reoortina Facilities r95115(kl 95103 (alit 1)1 Natural Gas Supplier Name: Southern California Gas Company (SCG) Supplier's ARB ID: 5002 Customer Number: 10261095938 Purchases/Acquisitions (MMBtu): 24,027.7 Was this natural gas received No directly from an interstate pipeline? Natural Gas Supplier Name: Southern California Gas Company (SCG) Supplier's ARB ID: 5002 Customer Number: 10471095009 Purchases/Acquisitions (MMBtu): 32,837.2 Was this natural gas received No directly from an interstate pipeline? Increases and Decreases in Facility €missions r95104ff11: Have facility emissions increased or decreased more than five percent in relation to the previous data year? NA (Not applicable because reporting as a fuel supplier, CO2 supplier, electric power entity, or not subject to the cap-and-trade program [e.g., abbreviated reporter]) Note:This section is not subject to the third-party verification requirements Electricity Generation Facility has the capacity to generate Yes electricity: CEC ID (if applicable): G0483 EIA ID (if applicable): 50696 FERC QFID (if applicable): 2460 CAISO ID (If applicable): NA Total Facility Nameplate Generating 7.5 MW Capacity: Facility Type: Independently operated and sited cogeneration facility Facility's Energy Disposition: Does not provide any generated energy outside of the facility boundary Generated electricity used for other 38,633 MWh on-site industrial processes that are https://ssl.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datmporting/subniitsummary.do?type=html&pid=12584 4/10/2017 GHU Summary Report rage w or I y not in support of or a part of the power generation system: Reported emissions include Yes emissions from a cogeneration/bigeneration unit: Parasitic Steam Use: Generated 131,854 MMBtu thermal energy used for supporting power production (excluding steam used directly for generating electricity) (95112(a)(5)(B)]: Generated thermal energy for on- 61,897 MMBtu site Industrial applications not related to electricity generation (95112(a)(5)(C)]: Subpart C: General Stationary Fuel Combustion Gas Information Details Gas Name Gas Quantity (Metric Tons Methane 1.40678 Exempt Bio enic Carbon dioxide 21,915.529 Nitrous Oxide 0.271153 Carbon Dioxide 3,178.316478 Total CO2e 25,207.44519 Total Covered CO2e Emissions: 3,291.916194 (Metric Tons) Emissions shown above that are 0 Metric Tons claimed as De Minimis (CO2e): Unit Details Unit Name: Boiler Configuration Type: Single Unit Using Tiers 1, 2, or 3 Unit Type: OB (Boller, other) Unit Description: Boller, Hurst Boiler and Welding Company, Model No. S5-250-125W, 10.5MMBTU/Hr Individual Unit Details Maximum Rated Heat Input 10.5 mmBtu/hr Capacity: Electricity Generation Unit Information Does this configuration have the No capacity to generate electricity? Emission Details: Configuration-Level Summary (User entered values) Total exempt annual biogenic CO2 62.91 mass emissions (must equal the sum https:Hml.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datmporting/submitsununary.do?type=html&pid=12584 4/10/2017 uwwuo.� .,Fv., rage J of I of calculated annual exempt biogenic CO2) (metric tons): Annual CO2 emissions from sorbent 0 (metric tons): Fuel-Specific Emissions Information Fuel: Biogas (Captured methane) - Biomass-Derived Fuels- Gaseous Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 62.909815 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.003866 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions: 0.000761 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 0.08119 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions CO2e: 0.235957 Metric Tons Equation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 1,890,732 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.000639 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 52.07 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.0032 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N20 Emissions Factor: 0.00063 kg N20/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec N N N N I N I N N N N N N N Fuel: Natural Gas - Natural Gas Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2016-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 1.204551 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.000023 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions: 0.000002 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 0.000477 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions CO2e: 0.000704 Metric Tons Eauation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 22,100 scf per Year: https://ssl.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datamporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=l2584 4/10/2017 UHU Summary Keport rage o of 19 Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.001028 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 53.02 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.001 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N2O Emissions Factor: 0.0001 kg N2O/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec N N N N I N I N I N N N N N N Unit Name: Generator CGS - 1 Configuration Type: Single Unit Using Tiers 1, 2, or 3 Unit Type: RICE (Reciprocating internal combustion engine) Unit Description: Internal Combustion Engine , Cooper Bessmer, Model No. LSVB-I2-SGC, 3471 HP, 2500 KW Electric Generator, 5008500 BTU/Hr capacity. Individual Unit Details Maximum Rated Heat Input 5.0085 mmBtu/hr Capacity: Electricity Generation Unit Information Does this configuration have the Yes capacity to generate electricity? Is this configuration a Part 75 unit? No Nameplate Generating Capacity: 2.5 MW Prime Mover Technology: Internal Combustion Engine Type of Thermal Energy Generation: Cogeneration Topping Cycle 95112(b)(2): Gross Generation: 19,405 MWh 95112(b)(2): Net Generation: 18,352 MWh 95112(b)(3): Total Thermal Output 29,282 MMBtu (for Cogeneration or Bigeneratlon): 95112(b)(8): Other Steam Used for Electricity Generation: 95112(b)(8): Input Steam to the Steam Turbine (for bottoming cycle cogeneration units only) 95112(b)(8): Output of the Heat Recovery Steam Generator (for bottoming cycle cogeneration units only) 95112(e): Geothermal Steam Utilized: 95112(f): Stationary Hydrogen Fuel Cell: Fuel Type and Provider (if not reported elsewhere) Additional Comments and Information Emission Details: Configuration-Level Summary (User entered values) https:Hssl.ub.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?type=hhnl&pid=12584 4/10/2017 Total exempt annual biogenic CO2 10,923.666 mass emissions (must equal the sum of calculated annual exempt biogenic CO2) (metric tons): Annual CO2 emissions from sorbent 0 (metric tons): Fuel-Specific Emissions Information Fuel: Natural Gas - Natural Gas Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 884.607642 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.016684 Metric Tons Total N2O emissions: 0.001668 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 0.350373 Metric Tons Total N2O emissions CO2e: 0.517217 Metric Tons Eauation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 16,182,749 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.001031 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 53.02 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.001 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N2O Emissions Factor: 0.0001 kg N20/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec N N N N N N N N N N N N Fuel: Blogas (Captured methane) - Biomass-Derived Fuels- Gaseous Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 10,923.666379 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.671322 Metric Tons Total N2O emissions: 0.132167 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 14.09776 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions CO2e: 40.971616 Metric Tons Equation Inputs https://ssi.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=12584 4/10/2017 t,titt Summary ttepon rage a oI 1.1 . Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 330,374,961 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.000635 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 52.07 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.0032 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N2O Emissions Factor: 0.00063 kg N2O/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct NoJ�Ni] N N N N N N N N N N N Unit Name: Generator CGS - 2 Configuration Type: Single Unit Using Tiers 1, 2, or 3 Unit Type: RICE (Reciprocating Internal combustion engine) Unit Description: Internal Combustion Engine , Cooper Bessmer, Model No. LSVB-I2-SGC, 3471 HP, 2500 KW Electric Generator, 5008500 BTU/Hr capacity. Individual Unit Details Maximum Rated Heat Input 5.0085 mmBtu/hr Capacity: Electricity Generation Unit information Does this configuration have the Yes capacity to generate electricity? Is this configuration a Part 75 unit? No Nameplate Generating Capacity: 2.5 MW Prime Mover Technology: Internal Combustion Engine Type of Thermal Energy Generation: Cogeneration Topping Cycle 95112(b)(2): Gross Generation: 18,973 MWh 95112(b)(2): Net Generation: 17,955 MWh 95112(b)(3): Total Thermal Output 28,142 MMBtu (for Cogeneration or Bigeneration): 95112(b)(8): Other Steam Used for Electricity Generation: 95112(b)(8): Input Steam to the Steam Turbine (for bottoming cycle cogeneration units only) 95112(b)(8): Output of the Heat Recovery Steam Generator (for bottoming cycle cogeneration units only) 95112(e): Geothermal Steam Utilized: 95112(f): Stationary Hydrogen Fuel Cell: Fuel Type and Provider (if not reported elsewhere) Additional Comments and Information https://ssi.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsunmtary.do?type=htnd.&pid=l2584 4/10/2017 UUU ow�.nwy . Vpvu rage Y or IJ Emission Details: Configuration-Level Summary (User entered values) Total exempt annual biogenic CO2 9,888.15 mass emissions (must equal the sum of calculated annual exempt blogenic CO2) (metric tons): Annual CO2 emissions from sorbent 0 (metric tons): Fuel-Specific Emissions Information Fuel: Biogas (Captured methane) - Biomass-Derived Fuels - Gaseous Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 9,888.148578 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.607683 Metric Tons Total N2O emissions: 0.119638 Metric Tans Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 12.761352 Metric Tons Total N2O emissions CO2e: 37.087678 Metric Tons Equation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 299,056,799 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.000635 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 52.07 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.0032 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N2O Emissions Factor: 0.00063 kg N2O/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. ]an Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec N N N N N N N N N N N N Fuel: Natural Gas - Natural Gas Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 937.344369 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.017679 Metric Tons Total N2O emissions: 0.001768 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 0.371261 Metric Tons Total N2O emissions CO2e: 0.548051 Metric Tons https://ssl.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/subniitsummary.do?type=html&pid=12584 4/10/2017 GHG Summary Report rage i u or i s . Eauation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 17,147,499 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.001031 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 53.02 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.001 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N2O Emissions Factor: 0.0001 kg N2O/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct NovNN N N N N N N N N N N N Unit Name: Generator CGS - 3 Configuration Type: Single Unit Using Tiers 1, 2, or 3 Unit Type: RICE (Reciprocating internal combustion engine) Unit Description: Internal Combustion Engine , Cooper Bessmer, Model No. LSVB-I2-SGC, 3471 HP, 2500 KW Electric Generator, 5008500 BTU/Hr capacity. Individual Unit Details Maximum Rated Heat Input 5.0085 mmBtu/hr Capacity: Electricity Generation Unit Information Does this configuration have the Yes capacity to generate electricity? Is this configuration a Part 75 unit? No Nameplate Generating Capacity: 2.5 MW Prime Mover Technology: Internal Combustion Engine Type of Thermal Energy Generation: Cogeneration Topping Cycle 95112(b)(2): Gross Generation: 2,456 MWh 95112(b)(2): Net Generation: 2,326 MWh 95112(b)(3): Total Thermal Output 4,473 MMBtu (for Cogeneration or Bigeneration): 95112(b)(8): Other Steam Used for Electricity Generation: 95112(b)(8): Input Steam to the Steam Turbine (for bottoming cycle cogeneration units only) 95112(b)(8): Output of the Heat Recovery Steam Generator(for bottoming cycle cogeneration units only) 95112(e): Geothermal Steam Utilized: 95112(f): Stationary Hydrogen Fuel Cell: Fuel Type and Provider (if not reported elsewhere) https:Hssl.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do'. pe=html&pid=12584 4/10/2017 rage I I of 13 Additional Comments and Information Emission Details: Configuration-Level Summary(User entered values) Total exempt annual biogenic CO2 1,040.803 mass emissions (must equal the sum of calculated annual exempt biogenic CO2) (metric tons): Annual CO2 emissions from sorbent 0 (metric tons): Fuel-Specific Emissions Information Fuel: Natural Gas - Natural Gas Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 81.801377 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.001543 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions: 0.000154 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 0.0324 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions CO2e: 0.047828 Metric Tons Equation Snouts Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 1,495,000 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.001032 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 53.02 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.001 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N20 Emissions Factor: 0.0001 kg N20/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usingone or more substitute data values. n A v Dec Feb N I N N N N N N N N N N N Fuel: Binges (Captured methane) - Biomass-Derived Fuels - Gaseous Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 1,040.802757 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.063963 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions: 0.012593 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 1.343229 Metric Tons https:Hssl.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGORT/datareporting/subniitsunimary.do?type=hurl&pid=12584 4/102017 GHG Summary Report Fage 12 01 13 Total N20 emissions CO2e: 3.90376 Metric Tons Equation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 31,478,000 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.000635 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 52.07 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.0032 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N20 Emissions Factor: 0.00063 kg N2O/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec N N N N I N I N N N N N N N Unit Name: GP-Comfort Heating/Misc NaturalGas Usage Configuration Type: Aggregation of Units Unit Type: OCS (Other combustion source) Unit Description: Natural Gas supply for space heating/comfort heating, water heaters, bunsen burners In the laboratory, Flare complex pilots, and hot water tank natural gas pilot. Small Unit Aggregation Details Highest Maximum Rated Heat Input 1.995 mmBtu/hr Capacity: Type of Emission Unit for this Group Other (none of the above) [Note: EGU/EGS must always be separated from other unit types]: Electricity Generation Unit Information Does this configuration have the No capacity to generate electricity? Emission Details: Configuration-Level Summary (User entered values) Total exempt annual biogenic CO2 0 mass emissions (must equal the sum of calculated annual exempt biogenic CO2) (metric tons): Annual CO2 emissions from sorbent 0 (metric tons): Fuel-Specific Emissions Information Fuel: Natural Gas - Natural Gas Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 1,273.36001 Metric Tons https://ssl.ub.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datamporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=12584 4/10/2017 Page 13 of 13 Total CH4 emissions: 0.024017 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions: 0.002402 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 0.504349 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions CO2e: 0.744515 Metric Tons Eauation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 23,271,897 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.001032 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 53.02 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.001 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N20 Emissions Factor: 0.0001 kg N20/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated Jan Feb Mar Ausn ne mo sbstitute data values. yo upr Jun Aug Sep Oct i Nov I Dec N I N I N I N I N I N I N N N N N N Time And Date Report Generated: 04/10/2017 11:22 https://ssl.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=12584 4/10/2017 UHU aummary xeport rage I of I / Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District - Plant 2 Facility ARB ID: 101280 Facility Reporting Year: 2016 Confidential Data Indication Set to "No" by Reporter Certification Statement: The designated representative or alternate designated representative must sign (i.e., agree to) this certification statement. If you are an agent and you click on "SUBMIT", you are not agreeing to the certification statement, but are submitting the certification statement on behalf of the designated representative or alternate designated representative who is agreeing to the certification statement. An agent Is only authorized to make the electronic submission on behalf of the designated representative, not to sign (i.e., agree to) the certification statement. Facility Representatives Agent: Joseph Steiner Agent: Corey Luth Designated Representative: Lisa Rothbart Alternate Designated randa abushaban Representative: Facility Location Physical Address: 22212 Brookhurst Street City: Huntington Beach State/ Province: CA ZIP/ Postal Code: 92646 Country: Latitude: 33.64029 Longitude: -117.95921 County: ORANGE Air Basin: SOUTH COAST District: SOUTH COAST AQMD Mailing Address: 10844 Ellis Avenue City: Fountain Valley State / Province: CA ZIP/ Postal Code: 92708 Country: Payment Information (required if subject to AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee Regulation) Responsible Party for Payment: Responsible Party Email: Responsible Party Phone: Billing Address: City: State / Province: https://ssl.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=12579 4/10/2017 GHG Summary Report rage 2 of I i ZIP/ Postal Code: Country: Owners / Operators Name: Orange County Sanitation District GHG Ouantity CO2 equivalent emissions, excluding 2,992.693772 Metric Tons biogenic (subparts C - AA): Exempt biogenic CO2 emissions 30,307.721 Metric Tons (subparts C - AA): CO2 equivalent emissions from fuel 0 Metric Tons supplier categories, excluding biogenic (subparts MM - NN): Exempt biogenic CO2 emissions 0 Metric Tons from fuel supplier categories (subparts MM - NN): CO2 emissions from CO2 Suppliers 0 Metric Tans (excluding biogenic) (subpart PP): Exempt biogenic CO2 emissions 0 Metric Tons from CO2 Suppliers (subpart PP): CO2 equivalent emissions from 0 Metric Tans electric power entities: Covered CO2 equivalent emissions: 2,992.693772 Metric Tons De Minimis CO2 equivalent 0 Metric Tons emissions: Maximum allowable De Minimis 999.012443 Metric Tons emissions: General Facility Reporting Information NAICS Codes Primary: 221320 (Sewage Treatment Facilities) Second Primary: Additional: U.S. Parent Companies Parent Company Name: Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Address: 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Percentage of Ownership Interest: 100% GHG Report Start Date: 2016-01-01 GHG Report End Date: 2016-12-31 Explanation of any calculation methodology changes during the reporting year: EPA a-GGRT Facility IDs Full or Abbreviated GHG Report: Full Company or Entity qualifies for No Small Business Status: https:Hssl.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=l2579 4/10/2017 ..wauauay awNvaa rage J pl 1 Are you applying for legacy contract No transition assistance under the cap- and-trade program [95894]?: Electricity Purchases/Acquisitions for Reporting Facilities (95304(d)) Electricity Provider's Name: Southern California Edison (SCE) Provider's ARB ID: 3005 Purchases/Acquisitions (MWh): 9,266 Natural Gas Purchases/Acquisitions for Reporting Facilities r95115(kl 95103 (a)(111 Natural Gas Supplier Name: Southern California Gas Company (SCG) Supplier's ARB ID: 5002 Customer Number: 09421095002 Purchases/Acquisitions (MMBtu): 50,405 Was this natural gas received No directly from an interstate pipeline? Natural Gas Supplier Name: Southern California Gas Company (SCG) Supplier's ARB ID: 5002 Customer Number: 09211095550 Purchases/Acquisitions (MMStu): 1,019.7 Was this natural gas received No directly from an Interstate pipeline? Increases and Decreases in Facility Emissions 1`95104MIa Have facility emissions increased or decreased more than five percent in relation to the previous data year? NA (Not applicable because reporting as a fuel supplier, CO2 supplier, electric power entity, or not subject to the cap-and-trade program [e.g., abbreviated reporter]) Note: This section Is not subject to the third-party verification requirements Electricity Generation Facility has the capacity to generate Yes electricity: CEC ID (if applicable): E0025 EIA ID (If applicable): 52099 FERC QFID (if applicable): 2804 CAISO ID (if applicable): NA Total Facility Nameplate Generating 16 MW Capacity: Facility Type: Independently operated and sited cogeneration facility Facility's Energy Disposition: None of the above Disposition of Generated Electricity [95112(a)(4)l Generated Electricity for Grid Disposition [95112(a)(4)(A)l https://ssl.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=12579 4/10/2017 UHU Summary Report rage v or i/ Unit, System Or Group Name Southern California Edison (SCE) Retail Provider/Marketer Name Southern California Edison (SCE) Electricity Provided or Sold (MWh) 1,361 Generated electricity used for other 49,814 MWh on-site industrial processes that are not in support of or a part of the power generation system: Reported emissions include Yes emissions from a cogeneration/bogeneration unit: Parasitic Steam Use: Generated 174,662 MMBtu thermal energy used for supporting power production (excluding steam used directly for generating electricity) [95112(a)(5)(B)]: Generated thermal energy for on- 45,440 MMBtu site industrial applications not related to electricity generation [95112(a)(5)(C)]: Subpart C: General Stationary Fuel Combustion Gas Information Details Gas Name IGas Quanta Metric Tons) Methane 1.916094 Exempt Bio enic Carbon dioxide 30,307.721 Nitrous Oxide 0.372047 Carbon Dioxide 2,837.121201 Total CO2e 33,300.414772 Total Covered CO2e Emissions: 2,992.693772 (Metric Tons) Emissions shown above that are 0 Metric Tons claimed as De Minimis (CO2e): Unit Details Unit Name: Generator CGS - 1 Configuration Type: Single Unit Using Tiers 1, 2, or 3 Unit Type: RICE (Reciprocating internal combustion engine) Unit Description: Internal Combustion Engine , Cooper Bessmer, Model No. LSVB-I6-SGC, 4166 HP, 3000 WN Electric Generator, 6010200 BTU/Hr capacity. Individual Unit Details Maximum Rated Heat Input 6.0102 mmBtu/hr Capacity: Electricity Generation Unit Information Yes https://ssl.arb.ca.gov/Ca[-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=l2579 4/10/2017 vnv O WIUI ay rtcpOrL rage of 1 / Does this configuration have the capacity to generate electricity? Is this configuration a Part 75 unit? No Nameplate Generating Capacity: 3 MW Prime Mover Technology: Internal Combustion Engine Type of Thermal Energy Generation: Cogeneration Topping Cycle 95112(b)(2): Gross Generation: 8,742 MWh 95112(b)(2): Net Generation: 8,314 MWh 95112(b)(3): Total Thermal Output 7,819 MMBtu (for Cogeneration or Bigeneration): 95112(b)(8): Other Steam Used for Electricity Generation: 95112(b)(8): Input Steam to the Steam Turbine (for bottoming cycle cogeneration units only) 95112(b)(8): Output of the Heat Recovery Steam Generator (for bottoming cycle cogeneration units only) 95112(e): Geothermal Steam Utilized: 95112(f): Stationary Hydrogen Fuel Cell: Fuel Type and Provider (if not reported elsewhere) Additional Comments and Information Emission Details: Configuration-Level Summary (User entered values) Total exempt annual biogenic CO2 4,632.074 mass emissions (must equal the sum of calculated annual exempt biogenic CO2) (metric tons): Annual CO2 emissions from sorbent 0 (metric tons): Fuel-Specific Emissions Information Fuel: Biogas (Captured methane) - Biomass-Derived Fuels - Gaseous Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 4,632.073885 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.284667 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions: 0.056044 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 5.978017 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions CO2e: 17.373613 Metric Tons Equation Inputs 138,997,800 scf https://ssl.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=12579 4/10/2017 GHG Summary Report rage o of I i Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.00064 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 52.07 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.0032 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N2O Emissions Factor: 0.00063 kg N2O/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated using one or more substitute data values. ]an Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec N N N N N N N N N N N N Fuel: Natural Gas - Natural Gas Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 479.788059 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.009049 Metric Tons Total N2O emissions: 0.000905 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 0.190033 Metric Tons Total N2O emissions CO2e: 0.280525 Metric Tons Eauation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 8,777,100 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.001031 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 53.02 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.001 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N2O Emissions Factor: 0.0001 kg N2O/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. ]an Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec N N N N N N N N N N N N Unit Name: Generator CGS - 2 Configuration Type: Single Unit Using Tiers 1, 2, or 3 Unit Type: RICE (Reciprocating internal combustion engine) Unit Description: Internal Combustion Engine , Cooper Bessmer, Model No. LSVB-I6-SGC, 4166 HP, 3000 KW Electric Generator, 6010200 BTU/Hr capacity. Individual Unit Details https://ssl.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datmporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=12579 4/10/2017 vnU owiwuuy ncpun rage / of 1 / Maximum Rated Heat Input 6.0102 mmBtu/hr Capacity: Electricity Generation Unit Information Does this configuration have the Yes capacity to generate electricity? Is this configuration a Part 75 unit? No Nameplate Generating Capacity: 3 MW Prime Mover Technology: Internal Combustion Engine Type of Thermal Energy Generation: Cogeneration Topping Cycle 95112(b)(2): Gross Generation: 1,979 MWh 95112(b)(2): Net Generation: 1,873 MWh 95112(b)(3): Total Thermal Output 1,984 MMBtu (for Cogeneration or Bigeneration): 95112(b)(8): Other Steam Used for Electricity Generation: 95112(b)(8): Input Steam to the Steam Turbine (for bottoming cycle cogeneration units only) 95112(b)(8): Output of the Heat Recovery Steam Generator (for bottoming cycle cogeneration units only) 95112(e): Geothermal Steam Utilized: 95112(f): Stationary Hydrogen Fuel Cell: Fuel Type and Provider (If not reported elsewhere) Additional Comments and Information Emission Details: Configuration-Level Summary (User entered values) Total exempt annual blogenic CO2 1,075.33 mass emissions (must equal the sum of calculated annual exempt biogenic CO2) (metric tons): Annual CO2 emissions from sorbent 0 (metric tons): Fuel-Specific Emissions Information Fuel: Blogas (Captured methane) - Biomass-Derived Fuels - Gaseous Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 1,075.32951 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.066085 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions: 0.013011 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 1.387788 Metric Tons Total N2O emissions CO2e: 4.03326 Metric Tons https://ssl.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsunimary.do?type=html&pid=12579 4/102017 GHG Summary Report rage a of I i Equation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 32,369,300 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.000638 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 52.07 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.0032 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N20 Emissions Factor: 0.00063 kg N20/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep I Oct I Nov I Dec N N N N N N N N N N N N Fuel: Natural Gas - Natural Gas Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 70.964311 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.001338 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions: 0.000134 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 0.028107 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions CO2e: 0.041492 Metric Tons Equation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 1,298,200 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.001031 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 53.02 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.001 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N20 Emissions Factor: 0.0001 kg N20/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec N N N N N N N N N N N 1 N Unit Name: Generator CGS - 3 Configuration Type: Single Unit Using Tiers 1, 2, or 3 Unit Type: RICE (Reciprocating internal combustion engine) Unit Description: Internal Combustion Engine , Cooper Bessmer, Model No. LSVB-I6-SGC, 4166 HP, 3000 KW Electric Generator, 6010200 BTU/Hr capacity. https://ssl.ub.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=12579 4/102017 Unv owrwuuy nopUr r rage 9 of 1 Individual Unit Details Maximum Rated Heat Input 6.0102 mmBtu/hr Capacity: Electricity Generation Unit Information Does this configuration have the Yes capacity to generate electricity? Is this configuration a Part 75 unit? No Nameplate Generating Capacity: 3 MW Prime Mover Technology: Internal Combustion Engine Type of Thermal Energy Generation: Cogeneration Topping Cycle 95112(b)(2): Gross Generation: 12,369 MWh 95112(b)(2): Net Generation: 11,794 MWh 95112(b)(3): Total Thermal Output 9,838 MMBtu (for Cogeneration or Bigeneration): 95112(b)(8): Other Steam Used for Electricity Generation: 95112(b)(8): input Steam to the Steam Turbine (for bottoming cycle cogeneration units only) 95112(b)(8): Output of the Heat Recovery Steam Generator (for bottoming cycle cogeneration units only) 95112(e): Geothermal Steam Utilized: 95112(f): Stationary Hydrogen Fuel Cell: Fuel Type and Provider (if not reported elsewhere) Additional Comments and Information Emission Details: Confiouration-Level Summary(User entered values) Total exempt annual biogenic CO2 6,615.075 mass emissions (must equal the sum of calculated annual exempt biogenic CO2) (metric tons): Annual CO2 emissions from sorbent 0 (metric tons): Fuel-Specific Emissions Information Fuel: Biogas (Captured methane) - Biomass-Derived Fuels - Gaseous Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 6,615.075347 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.406534 Metric Tons Total N2O emissions: 0.080036 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 8.53722 Metric Tons https:Hsslazb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datamporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=12579 4/10/2017 UHU Summary Report rage t u or t i Total N20 emissions CO2e: 24.811297 Metric Tons Eauation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 198,193,400 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.000641 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 52.07 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.0032 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N20 Emissions Factor: 0.00063 kg N20/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec N N N N N N N N N N N N Fuel: Natural Gas - Natural Gas Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 495.252397 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.009341 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions: 0.000934 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 0.196158 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions CO2e: 0.289567 Metric Tons Eauation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 9,060,000 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.001031 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 53.02 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.001 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N20 Emissions Factor: 0.0001 kg N20/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec N N N N N N N N N N N N Unit Name: Generator CGS - 4 Configuration Type: Single Unit Using Tiers 1, 2, or 3 Unit Type: RICE (Reciprocating Internal combustion engine) Unit Description: https://ssl.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?type=htrnl&pid=12579 4/10/2017 UnU 0wm11wy ncyuu rage 1 i or 1/ Internal Combustion Engine , Cooper Bessmer, Model No. LSVB-I6-SGC, 4166 HP, 3000 KW Electric Generator, 6010200 BTU/Hr capacity. Individual Unit Details Maximum Rated Heat Input 6.0102 mmBtu/hr Capacity: Electricity Generation Unit Information Does this configuration have the Yes capacity to generate electricity? Is this configuration a Part 75 unit? No Nameplate Generating Capacity: 3 MW Prime Mover Technology: Internal Combustion Engine Type of Thermal Energy Generation: Cogeneration Topping Cycle 95112(b)(2): Gross Generation: 14,775 MWh 95112(b)(2): Net Generation: 14,057 MWh 95112(b)(3): Total Thermal Output 12,976 MMBtu (for Cogeneration or Bigeneration): 95112(b)(8): Other Steam Used for Electricity Generation: 95112(b)(8): Input Steam to the Steam Turbine (for bottoming cycle cogeneration units only) 95112(b)(8): Output of the Heat Recovery Steam Generator (for bottoming cycle cogeneration units only) 95112(e): Geothermal Steam Utilized: 95112(f): Stationary Hydrogen Fuel Cell: Fuel Type and Provider (if not reported elsewhere) Additional Comments and Information Emission Details: Configuration-Level Summary (User entered values) Total exempt annual biogenic CO2 7,673.668 mass emissions (must equal the sum of calculated annual exempt biogenic CO2) (metric tons): Annual CO2 emissions from sorbent 0 (metric tons): Fuel-Specific Emissions Information Fuel: Biogas (Captured methane) - Biomass-Derived Fuels - Gaseous Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 7,673.668371 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.471591 Metric Tons https://ssl.ub.m.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=12579 4/10/2017 GHG Summary Report rage 12 oI 1 / Total N20 emissions: 0.092844 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 9.903409 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions CO2e: 28.781783 Metric Tons Equation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 230,269,000 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.00064 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 52.07 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.0032 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N20 Emissions Factor: 0.00063 kg N20/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. ]an Feb Mar Apr May lun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec N N N N N N N N N N N N Fuel: Natural Gas - Natural Gas Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 814.001432 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.015353 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions: 0.001535 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 0.322407 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions CO2e: 0.475934 Metric Tons Equation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 14,891,100 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.001031 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 53.02 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.001 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N20 Emissions Factor: 0.0001 kg N20/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one more substitute data values. Jan Feb Mar Apr May or Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec N N N N N I N N N N N N N Unit Name: Generator CGS - 5 & Steam Turbine Configuration Type: Single Unit Using Tiers 1, 2, or 3 Unit Type: https:Hssl.mb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datamporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=12579 4/10/2017 .,�.,owIauMy ncPun rage a of i i RICE (Reciprocating internal combustion engine) Unit Description: Internal Combustion Engine , Cooper Bessmer, Model No. LSVB-I6-SGC, 4166 HP, 3000 KW Electric Generator, 6010200 BTU/Hr capacity. Coppus Murray steam turbine, 1 MW, Serial No. T-5223, 767 HP, and 6520 RPM. Individual Unit Details Maximum Rated Heat Input 6.0102 mmBtu/hr Capacity: Electricity Generation Unit Information Does this configuration have the Yes capacity to generate electricity? Is this configuration a Part 75 unit? No Nameplate Generating Capacity: 4 MW Prime Mover Technology: Internal Combustion Engine Type of Thermal Energy Generation: Cogeneration Topping Cycle 95112(b)(2): Gross Generation: 16,746 MWh 95112(b)(2): Net Generation: 15,137 MWh 95112(b)(3): Total Thermal Output 12,823 MMBtu (for Cogeneration or Bigeneration): 95112(b)(8): Other Steam Used for Electricity Generation: 95112(b)(8): Input Steam to the Steam Turbine (for bottoming cycle cogeneration units only) 95112(b)(8): Output of the Heat Recovery Steam Generator (for bottoming cycle cogeneration units only) 95112(e): Geothermal Steam Utilized: 95112(f): Stationary Hydrogen Fuel Cell: Fuel Type and Provider (if not reported elsewhere) Additional Comments and Information Emission Details: Configuration-Level Summary (User entered values) Total exempt annual biogenic CO2 8,318.961 mass emissions (must equal the sum of calculated annual exempt biogenic CO2) (metric tons): Annual CO2 emissions from sorbent 0 (metric tons): Fuel-Specific Emissions Information Fuel: Natural Gas - Natural Gas Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details https://ssl.ub.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=12579 4/10/2017 UHU Summary Report rage 14 01 1/ Total CO2 emissions: 863.19869 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.016281 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions: 0.001628 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 0.341893 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions CO2e: 0.504699 Metric Tons Eauation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 15,791,100 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.001031 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 53.02 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.001 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N20 Emissions Factor: 0.0001 kg N20/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun lot Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec N N N N I N I N N N N N N N Fuel: Biogas (Captured methane) - Biomass-Derived Fuels - Gaseous Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 8,318.961082 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.511248 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions: 0.100652 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 10.736205 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions CO2e: 31.202095 Metric Tons Equation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 250,023,400 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.000639 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 52.07 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.0032 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N20 Emissions Factor: 0.00063 kg N20/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value Is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. lan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec N N N N N N N N N N N N https://ssl.arb.ca.gov/CaIxGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid=12579 4/10/2017 rage 13 or t I Unit Name: GP- Boilers (2) Configuration Type: Aggregation of Units Unit Type: OCS (Other combustion source) Unit Description: Two (2) Boilers, Cleaver Brooks, Model No. CB700-250, 10.21 MMBtu/Hr, Low-Nox Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation (FGR) system. Small Unit Aaareaatlon Details Highest Maximum Rated Heat Input 10.21 mmBtu/hr Capacity: Type of Emission Unit for this Group Boller [Note: EGU/EGS must always be separated from other unit types]: Electricity Generation Unit Information Does this configuration have the No capacity to generate electricity? Emission Details: Configuration-Level summary (User entered values) Total exempt annual biogenic CO2 1,992.613 mass emissions (must equal the sum of calculated annual exempt blogenic CO2) (metric tons): Annual CO2 emissions from sorbent 0 (metric tons): Fuel-Specific Emissions Information Fuel: Biogas (Captured methane) - Blomass-Derived Fuels- Gaseous Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 1,992.613331 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.122458 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions: 0.024109 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 2.571608 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions CO2e: 7.473735 Metric Tons Eauation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 59,887,281 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.000639 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 52.07 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.0032 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N20 Emissions Factor: 0.00063 kg N20/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec N N N N N N N N N N N N https://ssl.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?typc=html&pid=12579 4/10/2017 UHU Summary Keport rage io of i i Fuel: Natural Gas - Natural Gas Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 84.628038 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.001596 Metric Tons Total N2O emissions: 0.00016 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 0.033519 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions 002e: 0.049481 Metric Tons Equation Inputs Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 1,546,660 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.001032 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 53.02 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.001 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N20 Emissions Factor: 0.0001 kg N2O/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. ]an Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec N N N N N N N N N N N N Unit Name: GP-Comfort Heating/Misc NaturalGas Usage Configuration Type: Aggregation of Units Unit Type: OCS (Other combustion source) Unit Description: Natural Gas supply for space heating/comfort heating, water heaters, bunsen burners in the laboratory, and Flare complex pilot. Small Unit Aggregation Details Highest Maximum Rated Heat Input 0.95 mmBtu/hr Capacity: Type of Emission Unit for this Group Other (none of the above) [Note: EGU/EGS must always be separated from other unit types]: Electricity Generation Unit Information Does this configuration have the No capacity to generate electricity? Emission Details* Configuration-Level Summary (User entered values) Total exempt annual biogenic CO2 0 mass emissions (must equal the sum https://ssl.arb.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?type—html&pid=12579 4/10/2017 umv auuuiwry acpon Page 17 of 17 of calculated annual exempt biogenic CO2) (metric tons): Annual CO2 emissions from sorbent 0 (metric tons): Fuel-Specific Emissions Information Fuel: Natural Gas - Natural Gas Calculation Methodology: Tier 2 (Equation C-2a) Methodology Start Date: 2014-01-01 Methodology End Date: 2016-12-31 Frequency of HHV determinations: Monthly Fuel Emission Details Total CO2 emissions: 29.287747 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions: 0.000552 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions: 0.000055 Metric Tons Total CH4 emissions CO2e: 0.0116 Metric Tons Total N20 emissions CO2e: 0.017124 Metric Tons Equation Inouts Mass or Volume of Fuel Combusted 534,744 scf per Year: Annual Average High Heat Value: 0.001033 mmBtu/scf Fuel Specific CO2 Emissions Factor: 53.02 kg CO2/MMBtu Fuel Specific CH4 Emissions Factor: 0.001 kg CH4/MMBtu Fuel Specific N20 Emissions Factor: 0.0001 kg N20/MMBtu HHV Substitute Data Information - Identify each month for which the monthly HHV value is calculated usin one or more substitute data values. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec N N N N N N N N N N N N Time And Date Report Generated: 04/06/2017 17:16 https://ssl.ub.ca.gov/Cal-eGGRT/datareporting/submitsummary.do?type=html&pid-12579 4/10/2017 Soathcoast Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year. 2016 Facility Id. 17301 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facility Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Faciiiryrype: Waste Water Treatment - Municipal StatusUpdate Facility ID 17301 Facility Shutdown Date NA Change of Ownership Date NIA Change in Equipment Location Date NIA Emissions are zero for this year's report,or NIA emissions reduced by 50 Exemption Request N/A Use of alternative Calculation methodology NIA Other N/A Refund Request N/A Page 1 of 15 South coast Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year. 2016 Facility ld: 17301 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facility Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facilif rype: WasteWater Treatment - Municipal External Combustion Process List Overview D v m A O Criteria v Ov MN Equipment Fuel Fuel Units Pollutant ROG SPOG Nola, sox CO F Usage units es O DigeSler EF Ibel mimed 1000300 35.950000 e07Cg10 250000. ad40gA] E526 429662 P1 Flare Gas 0.580000 mM.d (Bingaa) Emissions Be 0.59 51,851 1.79 141 2.58 Bailer 10-100 Di rimmed geater EF Ibel e0006o s 7840000 3.2aP'UO 3.870000 2810000 ES35 d8/480 Pt 1,1108 R Gaa 1890000 mmad (Bi'l Emissions [be 11.15 15.01 site 731 5.31 Bailer 10-100 Natural EF Ibelnmed &501 e940000 O601 4.es0000 7 oro ES35 d&460 P2 MMBl Gas 0022100 .mad emntions lb. o.12 020 001 On On Total Emissions Be 11.851 36.06 7.84 8.87 8.05 Total Emissions tone 0.01 0.00 1 0.02 000 000 060 Page 2 of 15 South coast Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year. 2016 Facility ld: 17301 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facility Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facility rype: WasteWater Treatment - Municipal Internal Combustion Process List Overview a A m � v v A O Criteria O v MN Equipment Fuel Fuel Units Pollutant ROG SPOG NOx sox CO F Usage units i3 O Stationary I.C. Distillate EF Its/Mgal 37s00DW a69aa0000 02tfg1p 102000000 335ooDLU E54 133994 P1 Engines 2 Fuel Oil 0,335000 M gal - Btr e-cl In No 2 Emissions line 12.55 15)]2 O.W 30.1] 1133 Bum Bunion:, .C. Distillate EF Ibsl M gal 37o0ouroo 469.000000 0210000 102000.00 33500000 Engine ESS 133995 P1 Fue10il 0.385000 M gal SmAu,Lean Na.2 Frin ns line to. IW57 008 3927 "en Bum stationary I.C. Distillate EF bsl M gal 37So0000 4r9 DD0000 0210000 102.000000 11 no. Eau 13 619 P1 Engines, Fue1011 C415000 Mgal - Sh01R-Lean No.2 Emissions Be flat 222.78 0,10 0a.a5 1591 Bum Statonary I.C. Distillate EF Iini M gal 3i500000 469000000 0210✓000 102000000 33.50DDW Engines,2 ES] 135464 P1 Fuel Oil 0.395000 M gal Burn Lean No.2 Emissions Ibs tau tao.5) 0.03 3927 12. Burn Sationary I.C. Distillate EF IbalMgal s7,,; 0 4.000000 021CM0 102000000 33.501 Engines.2 E524 606166 P1 Fuel Oil 0.350000 M gel B[rokcL¢an No.2 Emissions Ibs 13,13 16G.15 D.W 35]0 11]3 Bum stationary LC. Distillate EF Ibsl M gel ais00000 469000000 0annoo 102000000 33s000m ES25 428945 P1 Engines,2 Fuel Oil 0300000 Mgal svoso,BUM No No Emissions Itons 15Wl 1 187.60 am 40.801 13.40 stationery LC Digester EF bill mscf m 1-0oroW3 ]4.2)0000 0.52xW0 533.w0o00 41. E$31 486160 P1 EngineSitalBe-.,an Gas 68.755000 mmscf Bum (BiOaas) Emisaiona Ibe 3]58.15 5108.43 3575 3888990 2aZ60 Stationary I.C. Digester EF Ibsl mmst( P0.Deli 62710000 0.539000 534.910000 10.010000 Engines 4 1]8.6000 ES32 486)92 P1 Stroke-Lean Gas 00 mmscf Bum (Biogas) Emissions lb. 1o,n230 1121250 94.79 at.190 1,7e979 Page 3 of 15 a v m e A '3_ 'o p Fuel Criteria o p A/N Equipment Fuel Units Pollutant ROG SPOG NOz sox CO PM '<_ < Usage Units 0 0 o Stationary I C. EF Ibsl turnedt e30000 21.230000 Osa0000 amount 3.540000 Engines,4 Digester 250.78110 ES33 486793 P1 Stre iean Gas00 mmscf B.M.with (B.'i Emissions Ins 458]! 5,320.0fi 13fl02 ..a-.- sa Catalyst Stationary I.C. EF bsl mmscf 1930000 21.230000 ob40000 9.530000 3.540000 Engines,4 Digester 1475610 ES42 W360 P1 Stmka-Lean Gas 00 mmstl Bum.win (Bias) Emissions Ibs 24852 313v2 ]see 1,406.26 52237 Catalyst BtaOonarylG EF bal mmscf 2500om 32460000 oe30000 usfi0000 141. Engines,4 NaNrel ES42 U6360 P2 Strokeiean Gas 6.146000 mmscf BUM.Wln Emissions Ibs 15.3] 169.Sfi 5.10 6951 332fi Cata'Yet 3bu-nl,LC EF nsl mmstl 18303N 21230000 0.51CM0 9530011 3.. Engin.. 4 Digester 135.9690 E$43 546361 P1 Stroke-Lean Gas 00 mmstl Bum,win (Bici Emissions is 2?L65 2,earal ]3.3 a"959e 4e140 Catalyst Stationary I.C. EF nsl mmstl 2500000 32.460000 Oe36000 14.590000 141. Engines,4 Natural E$43 546361 P2 Stroke-Lean Gas ].2)2000 mmstl Bum,AM Emission ns 1e.18 2-Au BW ID566 3934 Catalyst Stationery l.C. EF Ibsl mrsed 16300N 21230000 0.54Qt00 9530000 3.5400M Engines,4 Digester ES44 546362 P1 S=Lean Gas 0000000 rimed Bum,wiM (Biagi Emission Ibs 000 000 9W 000 000 Caalyst Stationery l.0 EF Ibsl mmscf 250000D 32460000 0830000 14.650000 54100W Engines,4 Natural 546362 P2 Stroke-Lean Gas 0.000000 mmstl Bum,wiM Emission Its 0w 000 aw 000 a00 Catalyst Distillate EF Ibel M gal 37,5000W 469000000 0210X0 102.000000 33.500DW ES48 06049A P1 Turbines Fuel Oil 0.270000 M gal No Emissions Ibs finis 126.63 0.be ZI.A 9D5 Distillate EF Itsl M gal VZOW00 4.raa000 021000) 102000000 33500000 ES49 06050A P1 Turbines Fuel Oil 0.315000 M gal No Emissions Ibs 11.81 14]14 0.07 32,13 10.55 Stationary lG EF bat mmsef 250L 32460000 aes0l 14560000 541. Engine., Natural ES62 486)93 P1 Bum lean Gas 8.838000 mmscf BUM.WIn Emissions Ibs 22,10 2%88 7,34 late. 47,81 Catalyst Stationary l.0 EF bat mmsef 811507P1 95150000 0.&q.U' 0 a800000 151903N ES63 486792 P1 Engines,ean Gas 4 Natural Strokei g2]D000 unused Bum Emissions Its )53.81 Tessa 8.82 8,]11.93 12582 Page 4 of 15 a v m m n 3 'o Criteria AIN 0 Equipment Fuel Fuel Units Pollutant ROG SPOG NOx sox CO PM 5. < Usage Units m o 0 o Stationery l.0 EF Ibsl mmscf et ee0000l tttd]999[ o.]e0000 ]99.980099 eno990 l E564 486780 P1 Stn*a Engines E.an 4 Nature Gas 1732000 mmml Bum Emisaons Has 14198 1 19289 1.35 1,38558 tam Total Emmentl, Ibs 16,432.13 30,732.19 446.11 146,133.00I 4,323.27 Total Emissions tons 8.22 0.00 15.37 0.22 ]3.0] 2.161 Page 5 of 15 South COast Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year. 2016 Facility Id: 17301 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facility Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facility Type: WasteWater Treatment - Municipal Other Use of Organics Process List Overview D v re A O Criteria Material Activity O v A/N w Equipment Code Material Description Usage Units Pollutant ROG SPOG NOx SOz CO PM m N units O Condre:Medal Cmdeve[ EF Ibsl gal trusteeCoating(Flow I Dip l Closure,and Coll Coating Opandions:Hand 55.20000 ES58 P1 Roil I Hand App median TwuPiaw Can Enamel/Epoxy O gal Ald'icatlon) Ecedar easesseved Emison, Ibs 154.56 Overvamim trears:Adbeshreand OF Ibslgal 5ClovdD E559 P1 Otherevaporative sealant Applianons HVLP RN ADH and PVC Blue 0.719000 gal sources Appliral Special Glue AtlM1 Purpose Contactesive emisvons Its 37a Coating(Flow I Dip l Coating'.Coatingol Moral EF Ibsl gal 2aoocco ES60 P1 Roll I Hand Park and Products:Hand Grl rPtlm<r 2200000 A lication Appllsadon:Ar Dried-Ona p a p ga Application) Compomm Emission, Ibs 5080 Total Emission< be 208.90 Thal Emission: tons 0.10 0.00 000 000 000 000 Page 6 of 15 South Coast Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year. 2016 Facility Id: 17301 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facility Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facility Type: wastewater Treatment - Municipal Storage Tanks Process List Overview > na an no T p O 'o Criteria O o A/N w Equipment Product m Units Pollutant ROG SPOG NOx sox Units O O � Storagelank Distillate EF IesIM gal op28CN ES61 P1 and fuel oil no. 1,500000 M gal Dispensing 2 E—ians Its p Total Emissions Its t Total Emissionsi tons 0.00 o00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page 7 of 15 Soutthh Coast Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year. 2016 Facility Id: 17301 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facility Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT FacllHyrype: Waste Water Treatment - Municipal Other Process Emissions Process List Overview D v m z A ° o Criteria Permll Ov MN w Activity S Units Pollutant ROG SPOG NOx sox CO PM Equipment m w c Units Description O � I Miscellaneous 0nBratlnn9 Ibsl Ssunn ER,ODOR ES21 356B78 P1 antl Services Sewageand 1167600 MMgalld EF MMgallday 2ac000000 (,e,000 OFM) Waste Treatment:Insaml 00 ay Entire Plant Emissions be 28,02240 Miscellaneous 0,hatlis s Ibsl SEWAGE THE iii ES29 453210 P1 and Services'.Sewage antl 89.81000 MMgelld EF Moil7fl00000o (-5 MGID)ANEROBIO waste Treatment:Industrial 0 ay Entire Plant emissions Ibs Z00Bra Mill BUSTING Abrasive Blasting/Finishing: 156.6000 EF Ibsl hour 002tcp0 (GABINETIMAGHINEM ES55 568969 Pt Metal Part:Abrasive 00 hour OOM) Blasting:Sand IEmlaelom Ibe 3,W Total Emissions Ibe 35,027.58 3.33 Total Emisslons tons 17,51 0,00 000 0,00 000 000 Page 8 of 15 Page 9 of 15 south Coast Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year: 2016 Facility ld: 17301 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facilitylstame ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facility Type: Waste Water Treatment - Municipal Criteria Pollutants Permitted Emissions Summary VOC SPOG NOx NOx RECLAIM sox SOx RECLAIM CO PM (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) External Combustion 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Internal Combustion 8.22 0.00 15.37 0.00 0.22 0.00 73.071 2.16 Spray Coating/Spray Booth 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Use of Organics 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Oar Storage Tanks 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fugitive Components 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Process Emissions 17.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Shutdown/Starlup/lurnaround and 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Upsets Total Permitted Emissions 25.74 0.00 15.39 0.00 0.22 0.00 73.07 2.16 Page 10 of 15 south Coast Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year: 2016 Facility ld: 17301 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facilty Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facility rype: Waste Water Treatment - Municipal Criteria Pollutants Non-Permitted Emissions Summary VOC SPOG NOx NOx RECLAIM sox SOx RECLAIM CO PM (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) External Combustion 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Internal Combustion 0.00 0.00 ODO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Spray Coating/Spray Booth 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Use of Organics 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Oar Storage Tanks 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fugitive Components 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Process Emissions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Shutdown/Startup/turnaround and 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Upsets Total Non-Permitted Emissions 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page 11 of 15 South Coast Annual Emission Report AQ M D Reporting Year. 2016 Facility Id: 17301 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facility Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facility Type: WasteWater Treatment - Municipal Toxic Air Contaminants (TAC) I Ozone Depleting Compounds (ODC) Emissions and Fees Summary TAC I CDC Annual Emissions Emissions Subject to Fee Fee Rates I TAC Group (Ibs) (Ibs) ($llbs) Fee Due 32 L onia 1.38047e+4 13,805 0.03 414.15 1 Asbestos 0.00000e+0 0 0.00 0.00 2 Benzene 7.84243e+1 78 2.08 162.24 3 Beryllium O.000OOe+0 0 0.00 0.00 4 Butadiene[1,3] 9.41941e+O 9 6.16 55.44 5 Cadmium 4.37250e-3 0 6.161 0.00 6 Carbon tetrachloride 3.60505e+O 4 2.08 8.32 7 Chlonmded dioxins and dibenzofurans 0.00000e+O 0 0.00 0.00 8 1,4-Dioxane 0.00000e+O 0 0.001 0.00 9 Ethylene dibromide{1,2-Dibromoethane) 1.45770e+O 1 2,081 2.08 10 Ethylene dichloride{1,2-Dichloroethane} 2.93942e+O 3 2.08 6.24 11 Ethylene oxide 0.00000e+0 0 0.00 0.00 12 Formaldehyde 2.06533e+4 20,653 0.46 9,500.38 13 Chromium,hexayalent(and compounds) 2.91500.4 0 8.211 0.00 14 Arsenic and Compounds(inorganic) 4.66400e-3 0 6.16 0.00 15 Lead compounds(inorganic) 2.41945e-2 0 2.08 0.00 16 Methylene chloride{Dichloromethane} 1.02316e+2 102 0.08 8.16 17 Nickel 1.13685e-2 0 4.10 0.00 18 Perchloroethylene{Tetmchloroethene} 7.32252e+21 732 0.46 336.72 19 PAHs(PAH,POM] 4.59302e+O 5 6.16 30.80 20 Trichloroethylene 2.07236e+O 0 0.16 0.00 21 Vinyl chloride 1.46794e+O 1 2.08 2.08 22 Fluorocarbons(chlorinated) 0.00000e+0 0 0.00 0.00 23 Methyl chloroform(1,1,1-Tnchloroethane) 1.47869e+1 15 0.05 0.75 Fees due total{$) 10,527.36 Page 12 of 15 South Coast Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year: 2016 Facility Id: 17301 Print Data: 02/26/2017 Facilify Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facility Type: WasteWater Treatment - Municipal Total Emissions and Fees Submittal Date: Total Permitted Total Non-Permitted Total RECLAIM Total Emissions/ Total Emission Emissions No later than March 02 Emissions Emissions Emissions Subject To Fee 2017 (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) Fees Due Organic Gasses 25.74 0.10 25.84 26.00 $13,934.63 Specific Organics 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 Nitrogen Oxides 15.39 0.00 0.00 15.39 15.00 $4,141.08 Sulfur Oxides 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 $0.00 Carbon Monoxide 73.07 0.00 73.07 0.00 $0.00 Particulate Matter 2.16 0.00 2.16 0.00 $0.00 1.TOTAL EMISSION FEES FOR ALL CRITERIA POLLUTANTS $18,075.71 2.TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS/OZONE DEPLETER FEES(Total amount from Form TACS or DC) $10,527.36 3.TOTAL FEES DUE $28,603.07 4.INSTALLMENTS PAID FOR2016-(Many)-AII Criteria Pollutants $12,316.47 5.INSTALLMENTS PAID FOR 2016.(M any)-Toxic Air ConuminantslOzone Depleters $8,802.85 6.BALANCE DUE(Line 3-Line 4-Line 5) $7,483.75 7.LATE PAYMENT SURCHARGE $0.00 8.AMOUNT DUE $7,483.75 Page 13 of 15 South Coast Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year: 2016 Facility Id: 17301 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facility Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facility Type: WasteWater Treatment - Municipal Signature Sheet Information NAICS code: 221320 AB2588 Filing Period: No Brief Description of Operation RECLAIM: No Facility Operating Status: Operating Classified As Small Business: No Business Operating Hours Wastewater Treatment Operations Hours/Day; 24 Days/Week: 7 Weeks/Year: 52 Equipment Location Address Mailing Information Facility Name: Facility Name: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVE 10844 ELLIS AVE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 927087018 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 927087018 Contact Information Name: Lisa Frigo Phone: 714593-7405 Title: Environmental Supervisor Fax 714 593-7773 E-mail: Ifrigo@ocsd.com Preparer Information Name: Lisa Frigo Phone: 714593-7405 Title: Environmental Supervisor Fax: 714593-7773 E-mail: Ifrigo@ocsd.com Authorized Person Information Name: Lisa Frigo Phone: 714593-7405 Title: Environmental Supervisor F. 714593-7773 E-mail: Ifdgo@msd.mm I declare under penalty of perjury that the data submitted truly represents throughput and emissions for this reporting period,and that the emission factors represent the best available data for my company in the calculation of annual emission figures. Authorized Signature Data Preparer Signature Date Page 14 of 15 South Coast Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year: 2016 Facility ld: 17301 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facility Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Factlity Type: WasteWatef Treatment • Municipal AER Submittal Confirmation Thank you for submitting your Annual Emissions Report for Facility ID: 17301 on 02/26/2017. Please print the submittal forms,sign the Signature Sheet(plus a check for emission fees due if applicable) and mail them to the SCAQMD. The reports are first received and processed by Bank of America for check deposits, return receipts for certified mails will be stamped by Bank of America rather than AQMD. Please mail the required forms and fees to the following address: South Coast Air Quality Management District Annual Emission Reporting Program File No. 54493 Los Angeles, CA 90074-4493 To avoid late payment surcharges, all mails must be postmarked by the Post Office on or before March 02, 2017 If you wish to use a messenger(or hand deliver),the package should be delivered to the cashier's booth at AQMD Headquarters at the address listed below in Diamond Bar on or before 5:00 p.m. March 02, 2017 Please note that AQMD is closed on Mondays. South Coast Air Quality Management District ATTN: Finance Cashier Annual Emission Reporting Program 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA91765-4178 Page 15 of 15 Soathcoast Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year. 2016 Facility Id. 29110 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facility Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Faciliryrype: Waste Water Treatment - Municipal StatusUpdate Facility ID 29110 Facility Shutdown Date NA Change of Ownership Date NIA Change in Equipment Location Date NIA Emissions are zero for this year's report,or NIA emissions reduced by 50 Exemption Request NIA Use of alternative Calculation methodology NIA Other NIA Refund Request NIA Page 1 of 15 South Coast Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year. 2016 Faciltyy ld: 29110 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facility Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT FacilHyrype: WasteWater Treatment - Municipal External Combustion Process List Overview D v m v A O v Fuel Criteria Ov MN Equipment Fuel Usage Units pollutant ROG SPOG NOz SOz CO m N Units O Digester 13.08000 EF Ibsl mmscf 120000D ]94s0DDD zzIWOD 25,70000 't". ES6 429663 Pi Flare Gas 0 mmscf (Bicgaa) Err.— Ibs 1570 398.81 28.91 339.82 66.32 Boiler Digester EF Ibsl mmscf t1600m 12550000 z100000 14.690000 4a10000 ES33 545004 P1 MMBTUMRO 42.1400 Gas 0 mmsd (Bicgas) Emssions line 4046 530.Sf 113]6 61904 17320 Boiler 10-100 NaNral EF Ibsl mmscf 5500000 10.510000 otti 0 5.160000 7600M Fan 545004 P2 MMBTUMR Gas t288a00 mmscf Emissions Ibe 6A] teal ore 552 96z Digester EF Ibsl mmscf 11503N ]080000 2,701 19600000 4.1100D0 E536 545005 p1 Boiler l0-100 Gas 17.74000 mscf MMBTUMR (Blogas) 0 m Emissions Ibs 2o. 12560 47.90 s4].]0 72.91 Boller 10-100 Natural EF Ibsl mmscf 5 tit 9720000 960000) 4630000 ].6DI E534 545005 P2 MMBTUMR Gas 0280000 moodE Ibs 154 2.]2 0.1] L30 mnoons 21J l Total Emissions I be 1 93.08 1.070.98 191.51 1.314.38 324.17 Total Emissions Iona 0.05 0.00 0.54 0.10 0.66 0.16 Page 2 of 15 South coast Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year. 2016 Facilify ld: 29110 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facility Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facilifyrype: WasteWater Treatment - Municipal Internal Combustion Process List Overview a A m � v A O Criteria v O v MN Equipment Fuel Fuel Units Pollutant ROG SPOG NOx sox CO F Usage units i5 O Stationary I.C.Engines 2 Dist ate EF Its/M gal 37500000 469000000 02t6CV0 102000000 11 In.. , ES4 424369 P1 Stroke-Lean Fuel Oil 0,290000 M gal Bum No Emissions Ibs isM 136.01 0.08 2858 9]2 Stationery LC. Distillate EF Ibs/Mgal 3Ta00000 469.000000 0210000 102.000000 33501 2 ES12 455670 P1 Engines, Fuel Oil 0.220000 M gal uOkELean No Emissions no 8.25 10316 005 22a4 ]3] Bum Stationary I.C. Distillate EF Ibsl M gal VZO0000 459000000 0210000 102.000000 11 no. ES13 455671 P1 Engines,2 Fuel Oil 0355000 Mgal - Siss Lean No.1 Emissions Be 13,31 1a6.m O.m .21 tt. Bum 6tatkunry I.C. Distillate EF Iini M gal 3i500000 469000000 0210✓000 102.000000 33.50DDW ESib 455673 p1 Engines,2 Fuel Oil 0.355000 Mgal - - Stmka-Lean No. Emasons Ibs 13.31 tfieso o.w 36.21 ttes Burn Sationary I.C. Distillate EF Ibsl M Bel 3i 500DW 469000000 0210CV0 102000000 33.5or. Engines.2 ES16 4]4]66 P1 Fuel Oil 0.655000 M gal BtrokcLean No.1 Emissions Ibe 2d 9C Ml a9 0.14 6].63 22.2a Bum Stationary LC. Distillate EF bsl M gal 3is00000 469og0000 021001 102M000O 11500. E59 OQ6] p1 Engineea Fuel Oil 0555000 M gal Strok�Lean Bum No 1- Emissions Ib3 20,811 1 2603aI 0.0 55.61 use Stationary LC Distillate Sm"ELe EF Ibsl M gal 3]s00000 459.000000 neuron 102.000000 115oo000 E$18 4]4]68 ptEngines,,an Fuel Oil 0.180000 IN gal - SeOk No.1 EmisYOns Be 675 84.42 0W - 803 Bum Stationary l C. Distillate EF Ibsl M gal 3i50WW 469.000000 021Cp10 102000000 33.50WW ES19 4]4]69 P1 Engines,2 Fuel Oil 0.30500t gal - Strok.Tean No. Frouslons [be 11'. ta3os Doe 3Ltt tn22 BUM Page 3 of 15 a v m e A '3_ 'o p Fuel Criteria o p A/N Equipment Fuel Units Pollutant ROG SPOG NO. SOv CO PM it'<_ < Usage Units 0 o e Stationery LC Ibs 1 Engines, Diatillate EF IbsIM gal 3lso.I I d89.0000001 e21P100 102.0000001 11 hur 00 E52p 4]4A0 P1 Fuel Oil 0.345000 M gal BuOkELean N 1 Emissions 291 1611 dill 9 00] 1159 U U Stages.,LG Digester EF Ibsl rated msd 6&59 81150000 40]4W 0W C0 538.610000 6.910 Engines,4 74.79330 ESZ] 540]OB P1 Stroke-Lean Gas 0 mmsd - BUrn (Blanes) Emissions Its 5,130ID 6,018se 3,Od766 402M40 516 d2 Stationary I.C. Digester EF Ibsl mmsd 48.5]0'�J 88.1]0000 d9.2&sYA 538090000 9.04p000 E328 540]09 P1 Stroke-Lean Gas 32.369300 in and Bum (Bias) Emissions Ibs 1,W]M 2,85460 1,ssEM 17411.60 292,62I Stationary LC. Digester EF Its/mmscf 116"ai Uares00 0.5&A40 32460000 2As. ES29 W710 P1 Engines.4 Gas 89.56030 msct -¢an 6 (Binges) 'Urn m Emissione Its 1,04248 7,255.86 50.15 2.907.11 220.32 Stationary LC. Digester EF Ib m sl msd 0000 65]4 M670000 to. wo 21shoo0 3510990 E530 M0711 P1 Engines,4 Gas t38.8980 msct Bum Slieke-L¢Bn (BIc08s) pp m Emisaiam Ibs 8993.57 11W 10 518920 75,60190 49168 Stationary LC. Digester EF Ibsl mmsd 54950W3 ]2.5I0000 382BNC0 591.4I000O 3]80000 En9�nes 6 es er 159.248] ES31 St0712 P1 Stroke-Lean Gas 00 mmsd Bum (B1O3as) Emisaons Ibe li 72 n,5'.8]0 assess 14,19D.d0 set 96 Stationary LC. EF Ibsl mmsd 163MW 21.230000 0.54Qt00 9.530000 3.540000 Engin se.4 Digester 64.20450 ES35 546364 P1 Stroke-Lean Ges 0 mmsd Bum,with (Binges) Emiseians Its 104,651 1,3 '06 34.67 61187 22729 Catalyst Stationary LG EF Ibsl mused 2.500000 32.460000 081Qt00 14.560000 54100DO Engines,4 Natural 546364 P2 Stroke-Lean Gas 4.209000 mmsd Burn,with Em6aons its 10.52 136.62 3,49 61.28 22]] Catalyst Stationary I.C. EF Ibsl mmsd 1630000 I 21.230000 0.54- 9.530000 35400LU Engine,4 Digester ES36 546365 P1 Stroke-Lean Ges 0.000000 mmscf Burn,with (eioges) Emasens be OW Catalyst 0.00 O.W 0.00 OW Stationary I.C. EF Ibsl mmsd 25000( 1 32.00000 081WC0 14.560000 541- Engme44 Natural ES36 546365 P2 Stroke-Lean Gas 0.000000 mmscf Burn,with Emissions Its 003 0.00 0- 0.00 003 Catalyst Stationary l C. EF bsl mmscf tut. 21230000 D.54o0DD ausu DD 3540000 Engine.,4 Digester 108.6531 ES37 W366 P1 Stroka-Lean Gas 00 mmsd Burn,with (Biogal Emiewns Its 1]].11 2,306.]1 58.67 1,035.46 38463 Catalyst Stationary l C. EF bsl mmscf 1 2 sta 32.d800D31 oBaDDDo 14s6DDDD 541 DDm Engines,4 Natural ES37 W366 P2 Stroke-Lean Gas 5.06]000 armedBUm.wits Emiiess. Has 12,67 16408 4,21 ]3.]8 27,41 Catalyst Page 4 of 15 a v an e A 99_ 'o p Fuel Criteria o p A/N Equipment Fuel Units Pollutant ROG SPOG NO. sox CO PM '<_ < Usage Units 'o 0 Stat o Engines 4 EF bsl mmscf 19303N 21s30000 Osao6hh -00o 3510hhh Engiona 4 Digester 93.371(0 ES38 W367 P1 Stmke-Lean Gas0 mmscf Burn,with (Bioga3) Emissions Iba Isa. 1,9t12.27 s9A2 e119.83 13n53 Catalyst Stationary I.C. EF bsl mmsct 25. 32,160000 aestra 14,660000 5410000 Engine.,4 NaturalES38 W367 P2 Stmka-Lean Gas 8.557500 mmscf Burl,with Emissions Be 2139 =111 ].ID 1.e0 dash Catalyst Stationary 1.C. EF bal ansid 1830000 21.230000 0.Sa0000 9.530000 as4o00h Engines Digester 90])400 ES39 M6368 P1 Burka LeonGas 0 mmscf Burn.With (Eavoil ) Ernst- Iba 11T. 1,92rr13 4902 88508 32134 Catalyst Ststationary I.C. ass,4 Natural EF Ibal muse 25W^W 32.480000 0&1Cp10 N.580000 54100W ES39 W368 P2 Stroke-Lean Gary 6.434400 mmscf Burn,AM _ Catalyst Emissions Iba Was 208.8a 5.34 9J68 3481 S:'er ry LG Distillate EF Ib3lM gal 3i 500',p3 469.000000 0210000 102000000 3350)0W ES44 06045A P1 Engine.,2 Fuel Oil 0.000000 M gal - Slr Lean BumM No.1 Emissions Be o00 0.00 000 0.00 Oan Statlonary I.C. Distillate EF The M gal 37,5000001 1 ME.000000 1 9210000 102.OW000 -,Is- , E345 0604 Engines 2 fiA P1 Fuel Oil 0.205000 M gal Straka-Lean No.i Emissions Ibs ]69 96.1E ass seen 68] Bum Stationary LC. Dst llate EF IbslM gal 37500000 489000000 o210000 m2.000000 33500000 Engines,2 ES46 0604)A P1 Straka-Lean Fuel Oil 0.325000 M gal Bum No Emissions Ibs 12,19 15343 0.07 33.1E loss Stationary LC. Distillate EF balM gel area. 469000000 0210000 102000000 11 ass m E547 06048A P1 Engine42 Fusl Oil 0290000 Mgal - 3trake-Le6n Bum No Emission Me low 138.01 01% 29.58 972 stationery'C EF Ibsl rated 103.1600W 122.200000 .1,- Wii.020000 In.380000 ESS] 540)OB p1 Engines�NaNral d,arg8100 mmscf - $hOkB-L6an Gary Emissions [be art 25 558.22 27989 3,70025 4]42 Bum Bs:tlorai l.C. EF Molmm3d A4.6300W 129.930000 ]38]WCO 792.930000 13.330000 ES58 540)09 p1 Stnal,Enginea 4 Gat. 1298200 mmscf - Burn can G88 Emissions Iba is 10 1ae.e8 au.29 1,02938 17.31 Burn Stationary LC EF Ibsl mmsef Vassal 120820000 0,830000 40400000 h anal Engines,4 Natural ES58 540]1 B An Gas Burn, Ma 4.541200 mmsvi E4 `A BaUlyst Emissions Be ]B 8.8] 3T/ 21979 188] Catalyst Stationary I.C. EF Ibsl mmsef 97,020000 139710000 56800W 814.970000 5.29000D Engines,4 Natural ES60 540]11 P1 Straka-Lean Gas 6.333600 mmscf Bum Emissions Ibs 61449 8948] 35975 5,1M.e8 3350 Page 5 of 15 a v m m n 3 'o Criteria AIN 0 Equipment Fuel Fuel Units Pollutant ROG SPOG NO. Sox CO PM S. < Usage Units o 0 5[ali, ryLC. � EF bslmmse( seasto 9 1069<0000 53OPT10 8]1.590000 fl560099 ES61 540712 P1 Engines,4 Natural 9356700 named - Slrok,Lean Gas Emie&ana Ibe ]5]]1 1PU 81 50030 8.15521 5202 Bum � Total EmiasiansII Ibs 20,237.71 11 54,152.70 17,67057 252,840.91 3,822.19 Telal Emission! ton. 14.12 0.00 27.08 8.84 12642 191 Page 6 of 15 South coast Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year. 2016 Facility Id: 29110 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facility Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facility Type: Wastewater Treatment - Municipal Other Use of Organics Process List Overview D v m � � A O Criteria Material Activity Ov A/N w Equipment Code Material Description Usage Units Pollutant ROG SPOG NOx SOz CO PM c M trade O Coating(Flow/Dip/ coating'.Crime M Made EF Ibal gal 23n. ESSt P1 Roll l Hand Pars and Pirdell:Hand Metal palls and products 6,750000 gal Application) pepper/Toixh Upad Emissions be 1553 Cdatirg(Flowl Dip/ Coating:Coatingol Meal EF Ibslgal ean. ES55 P1 Roll l Hand Pam and Pmduda:Hand be Metal waUng 63.49000 gal t Applmation:AinDi 0 Emiedom I nvr PpP ica ion) F,l retch Up Cdatitg(Flow l Dip l Coating:Wood Flat Stack EF Ibsl gal a2DDom ES55 P1 Roll I Hand Coating Operations:Hand WOdd applications 075DOOO gal Application) Appiwail Mhari prod— Iba 2d 1. Total Emissions be 218.00 Total Frei tons ail 000 aDO 000 o DO 000 Page 7 of 15 soutthca ost Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year. 2016 Facility Id: 29110 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facility Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facility Type: Waste Water Treatment - Municipal Other Process Emissions Process List Overview �T D v y m A ° o Criteria Parnell iJv AM w Activity n Units Pollutant ROG SPOG NOx sox CO PM Equipment n w c Units Description O Miscellaneous Oilaratlnns bet 31P.ETREATMENT ES10 453240 P1 anb Services.Sewageantl 6579000 MMgalkJ EF MMgallday sta.00 o ps MGM)ANERoelc Waste Treatment:ludusOial 0 ay Entire Plant Emiaioos Ibs 14,4a8 as Total Emissions Iba 14,408.00 TOWIEmisslons tons 1 7.20 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.00 Page 8 of 15 Page 9 of 15 Ssuth cexst Annual Emission Report AQ MD Reporting Year: 2016 Facility Id: 29110 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facilitylstame ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facilityrype: Waste Water Treatment - Municipal Criteria Pollutants Permitted Emissions Summary VOC SPOG NOx NOx RECLAIM sox Sox RECLAIM CO PM (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) External Combustion 0.05 ocr, 0.54 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.66 0.16 Internal Combustion 14.12 0.00 27.08 0.00 8.84 0.00 126.42 1.91 Spray Coating/Spray Booth 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Use of Organics 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage Tanks 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 coo Fugitive Components 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 coo Other Process Emissions 720 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Shutdown/Startup/turnaround and 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Upsets Total Permitted Emissions 21.37 0.00 27.62 0.00 8.94 0.00 127.08 2.07 Page 10 of 15 south Comst Annual Emission Report AQ MD Reporting Year: 2016 Facility Id: 29110 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facilty Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facllityrype: Waste Water Treatment - Municipal Criteria Pollutants Non-Permitted Emissions Summary VOC SPOG NOx NOx RECLAIM sox SOx RECLAIM CO PM (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) External Combustion 0.00 ocr, coo, 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 oco Internal Combustion 0.00 0.00 ODO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OAO Spray Coating/Spray Booth 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.00 0.00 coo Other Use of Organics 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage Tanks 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 coo Fugitive Components 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 coo Other Process Emissions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Shutdown/Startup/turnaround and 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Upsets Total Non-Permitted Emissions 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page 11 of 15 South Coast Annual Emission Report AQ M D Reporting Year. 2016 Facility Id: 29110 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facility Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facility Type: WasteWater Treatment - Municipal Toxic Air Contaminants (TAC) I Ozone Depleting Compounds (ODC) Emissions and Fees Summary TAC Group TAC I CDC Annual Emissions Emissions Subject to Fee Fee Rates (Ibs) (Ibs) ($llbs) 32 Ammonia 9.11080e+3 9,111 0.03 273.33 1 Asbestos 0.00000e+0 0 0.00 0.00 2 Benzene I 6.48729e+1 65 2.08 135.20 3 Beryllium 0.00000e+D 0 0.00 0.00 4 Butadiene[1,3] 1.51548e+1 15 6.16 92.40 5 Cadmium 6.13500e-3 0 6.16 0.00 6 Carbon tetrachloride 4.47385.+0 4 2.08 8.32 7 Chlorinated dioxins and dibenzofurans 0.00000.+0 0 0.00 0.00 8 1,4-Dioxane 0.00000e+0 0 0.00 0.00 9 Ethylene dibromide{1,2-Dibromoethane) 2.27582e+0 2 2.08 4.16 10 Ethylene dichloride{1,2-Dichloroethane) 3.63546e+D 4 2.08 8.32 11 Ethylene oxide 0.00000e+D 0 0.00 0.00 12 Formaldehyde 3.16995e+4 31,700 0.46 14,582.00 13 Chromium,hexayalent(and compounds) 4.09000.4 0 8.21 0.00 14 Arsenic and Compounds(inorganic) 6.54400e-3 0 6.16 0.00 15 Lead compounds(inorganic) 3.39470e-2 0 2.08 0.00 16 Methylene chloride{Dichloromethane) 3.32273e+1 0 0.08 0.00 17 Nickel 1.59510e-2 0 4.10 0.00 18 Perchloroethylene{Tetmchloroethene) 1.16738e+2 117 0.46 53.82 19 PAHs(PAH,POM] 7.35154e+0 7 6.16 43.12 20 Trichloroethylene 2.67102e+0 0 0.16 0.00 21 Vinyl chloride 1.81471e+0 2 2.08 4.16 22 Fluorocarbons(chlorinated) 0.00000e+0 0 0.00 0.00 23 Methyl chloroform(1,1,1-Tnchlomethane) 1.29284e+0 11 0.05 0.05 Fees due total{$) 15,204.88 Page 12 of 15 South Coast Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year: 2016 Facility Id: 29110 Print Data: 02/26/2017 Facility Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facility rype: Wastewater Treatment - Municipal Total Emissions and Fees Submittal Date: Total Permitted Total Non-Permitted Total RECLAIM Total Emissions/ Total Emission Emissions No later than March 02 Emissions Emissions Emissions Subject To Fee 2017 (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) Fees Due Organic Gasses 21.37 0.11 21.48 21.00 $10,617.48 Specific Organics 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 Nitrogen Oxides 27.62 0.00 0.00 27.62 28.00 $9,236.49 Sulfur Oxides 8.94 0.00 0.00 8.94 9.00 $2,454.84 Carbon Monoxide 127.08 0.00 127.08 127.00 $197.68 Particulate Matter 2.07 0.00 2.07 0.00 $0.00 1.TOTAL EMISSION FEES FOR ALL CRITERIA POLLUTANTS $22,506.49 2.TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS/OZONE DEPLETER FEES(Total amount from Form TACS or DC) $15,204.88 3.TOTAL FEES DUE $37,711.37 4.INSTALLMENTS PAID FOR2016-(Many)-AII Criteria Pollutants $18,854.42 5.INSTALLMENTS PAID FOR 2016.(it any)-Toxic Air ContaminantslOzone Depleters $10,635.69 6.BALANCE DUE(Line 3-Line 4-Line 5) $8,221.26 7.LATE PAYMENT SURCHARGE $0.00 8.AMOUNT DUE $8,221.26 Page 13 of 15 South Coast Annual Emission Report Al Reporting Year: 2016 Facility Id: 29110 Print Date: 02/26/2017 Facility Name ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facility Type: WasteWater Treatment - Municipal Signature Sheet Information NAICS code: 221320 AB2588 Filing Period: No Brief Description of Operation RECLAIM: No Facility Operating Status: Operating Classified As Small Business: No Business Operating Hours Wastewater Treatment Operations Hours/Day; 24 Days/Week: 7 Weeks/Year: 52 Equipment Location Address Mailing Information Facility Name: Facility Name: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 22212 BROOKHURST ST 10844 Ellis Avenue HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 8457 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Contact Information Name: Lisa Fngo Phone: 714593-7405 Ext.7405 Title: Environmental Supervisor Fax 714 593-7773 E-mail: Ifrigo@ocsd.com Preparer Information Name: Lisa Frigo Phone: 714593-7405 Ext.7405 Title: Environmental Supervisor Fax: 714593-7773 E-mail: Ifrigo@ocsd.com Authorized Person Information Name: Lisa Frlgo Phone: 714593-7405 Ext.7405 Title: Environmental Supervisor F. 714593-7773 E-mail: Ifdgo@msd.mm I declare under penalty of perjury that the data submitted truly represents throughput and emissions for this reporting period,and that the emission factors represent the best available data for my company in the calculation of annual emission figures. Authorized Signature Data Preparer Signature Date Page 14 of 15 South Coast Annual Emission Report AQMD Reporting Year: 2016 Facility ld: 29110 Print Date: 02/26/2017 FacilitylJame ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Facility Type: WasteWatef Treatment • Municipal AER Submittal Confirmation Thank you for submitting your Annual Emissions Report for Facility ID:29110 on 0 212 612 01 7. Please print the submittal forms,sign the Signature Sheet(plus a check for emission fees due if applicable) and mail them to the SCAQMD. The reports are first received and processed by Bank of America for check deposits, return receipts for certified mails will be stamped by Bank of America rather than AQMD. Please mail the required forms and fees to the following address: South Coast Air Quality Management District Annual Emission Reporting Program File No. 54493 Los Angeles, CA 90074-4493 To avoid late payment surcharges, all mails must be postmarked by the Post Office on or before March 02, 2017 If you wish to use a messenger(or hand deliver),the package should be delivered to the cashier's booth at AQMD Headquarters at the address listed below in Diamond Bar on or before 5:00 p.m. March 02, 2017 Please note that AQMD is closed on Mondays. South Coast Air Quality Management District ATTN: Finance Cashier Annual Emission Reporting Program 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA91765-4178 Page 15 of 15 1 a • r �4w � / i N 1� 1 1 � w ter, k Orange County SanitationDistrict Ocean MonitoringReport Year 1 16 Serving: Orange County Sanitation District Anaheim 10844 Ellis Avenue,Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Brea March 8, 2017 714.962,2411 • www.ocsd.com Buena Park Kurt V. Berchtold, Executive Officer Cypress California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region 8 Fountain Valley 3737 Main Street, Suite 500 Fullerton Riverside, CA 92501-3339 Garden Grove SUBJECT: Board Order No. R8-2012-0035, NPDES No. CA0110604 2015-16 Marine Monitoring Annual Report Huntington Beach Irvine Enclosed is the Orange County Sanitation District(Sanitation District)2015-16 Marine Monitoring Annual Report. This report focuses on the findings and conclusions for the monitoring period July La Habra 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016. Overall, the results of the monitoring program document that the disposal of our treated and disinfected effluent into coastal marine waters continues to protect the La Palma environment and human health. Los Alamitos The results of the 2015-16 monitoring effort showed minimal changes in the receiving water conditions. Plume-related changes in temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, pH, and Newport Beach transmissivity beyond the ZID were well within the range of natural variability, and compliance with numeric receiving water criteria was achieved over 98%of the time. This demonstrated that the Orange coastal receiving water environment outside the zone ofinitial dilution(ZID)has not been degraded Placentia by the Sanitation District's wastewater discharge. The low concentrations of bacteria in water contact zones, together with the limited distributions of ammonium, also suggest that the Santa Ana wastewater discharge posed no human health risk and did not compromise recreational use. Seal Beach There were no impacts to the benthic animal communities within and adjacent to the ZID. Infauna, epibenthic macroinvertebrate, and fish communities in the monitoring area were healthy, with all Stanton sites classifying as reference condition. In addition, permit-regulated sediment contaminants remained at background levels. The low levels of contaminants in fish tissues, and the low Tustin incidence of external abnormalities and diseases in fish populations demonstrated that the outfall was not an epicenter of disease. Villa Park Should you have questions regarding the information provided in this report, or wish to meet with County of orange Sanitation District staff to discuss any aspect of our ocean monitoring program, please feel free to Costa Mesa contact me at(714) 593-7450. Sanitary District However, you may also contact Dr. Jeff Armstrong, the Supervisor of our Ocean Monitoring Midway City section, who may be reached at(714) 593-7455 or at larmstrono(lDocsd.com. Sanitary District Irvine Ranch Water District ames Colston Yorba Linda Director of Environmental Services Water District JC:JA:dt:bg:pe Nu 890\Groups\O1VIP1CommonVMnual Reportsr2015-16 Annual Report101 -Cover and Front MatteACover Letters o° Enclosure cc: Alexis Strauss, U.S. EPA, Region IX Our Mission: To protect public health and the environment by -- providing effective wastewater collection, treatment, and recycling. This page intentionally left blank. serving' Orange County Sanitation District Anaheim 10844 Ellis Avenue,Fountain Valley,CA 92708 714.962.2411 • www.ocsd.com Brea Buena Park Cypress March 8, 2017 Fountain Valley Fullerton Certification Statement Garden Grove Huntington Beach The following certification satisfies Sections A.10 and A.15 of the Orange County Irvine Sanitation District Monitoring and Reporting Program No. R8-2012-0035, NPDES No. La Habra CA0110604, for the submittal of the attached OCSD Annual Report 2017 — Marine Monitoring. La Palma Los Alamitos I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were Newport Beach prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system Orange designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person Placentia or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to Santa Ana the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am Seal Beach aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for known violations. Stanton Tustin Villa Park County of orange James Colston Date Director of Environmental Services Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District Irvine Ranch Water District Yorba Linda Water District Our Mission: To protect public health and the environment by providing effective wastewater collection, treatment, and recycling. This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS Contents List of tables iv List of Figures ix Acknowledgments xi Executive Summary ES-1 Chapter 1 The Ocean Monitoring Program 1-1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT'S OPERATIONS 1-1 REGULATORY SETTING FOR THE OCEAN MONITORING PROGRAM 1-4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 1-5 REFERENCES 1-8 Chapter 2 Compliance Determinations 2-1 INTRODUCTION 2-1 WATER QUALITY 2-1 Offshore bacteria 2-1 Floating Particulates and Oil and Grease 2-1 Ocean Discoloration and Transparency 2-2 Dissolved Oxygen (DO) 2-4 Acidity(pH) 2-4 Nutrients (Ammonium) 2-4 Organics in the Water Column 2-5 Radioactivity 2-5 Overall Results 2-5 SEDIMENT GEOCHEMISTRY 2-7 BIOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES 2-7 Infaunal Communities 2-7 Epibenthic Macroinvertebrate Communities 2-10 Fish Communities 2-11 FISH BIOACCUMULATION AND HEALTH 2-12 Demersal Fish Tissue Chemistry 2-12 Sport Fish Muscle Chemistry 2-14 Contents Fish Health 2-14 Liver Histopathology 2-15 CONCLUSIONS 2-22 REFERENCES 2-23 Chapter 3 Strategic Process Studies and Regional Monitoring 3.1 INTRODUCTION 3.1 REGIONAL MONITORING 3.1 Regional Nearshore (Surfzone) Bacterial Sampling 3.1 Central Bight Regional Water Quality Program 3.2 Bight'13 Regional Monitoring 3.2 Regional Kelp Survey Consortium—Central Region 3.3 Ocean Acidification Mooring 3.5 SPECIAL STUDIES 3.5 California Ocean Plan Compliance Determination Method Comparison 3.5 Compliance Determinations 3.6 Results and Discussion 3.6 REFERENCES 3.8 Appendix A Methods A-1 INTRODUCTION A-1 WATER QUALITY MONITORING A-1 Field Methods A-1 Laboratory Methods A-3 Data Analyses A-3 Compliance Determinations A-3 SEDIMENT GEOCHEMISTRY MONITORING A-6 Field Methods A-6 Laboratory Methods A-7 Data Analyses A-8 BENTHIC INFAUNA MONITORING A-8 Field Methods A-8 Laboratory Methods A-8 Data Analyses A-9 TRAWL COMMUNITIES MONITORING A-10 Field Methods A-10 Laboratory Methods A-11 Contents Data Analyses A-11 FISH TISSUE CONTAMINANTS MONITORING A-11 Field Methods A-11 Laboratory Methods A-12 Data Analyses A-13 FISH HEALTH MONITORING A-13 Field Methods A-13 Data Analyses A-13 REFERENCES A-14 Appendix B Supporting Data B-1 Appendix C Quality Assurance/Quality Control C-1 INTRODUCTION C-1 WATER QUALITY NARRATIVE C-1 Ammonium C-1 Bacteria C-2 SEDIMENT CHEMISTRY NARRATIVE C-3 Semi-Annual Collections (July 2015 and January 2016) C-3 FISH TISSUE CHEMISTRY NARRATIVE C-11 First Quarter(July 2015) C-11 BENTHIC INFAUNA NARRATIVE C-15 Sorting and Taxonomy QA/QC C-15 OTTER TRAWL NARRATIVE C-17 REFERENCES C-23 Appendix D Fish Tissue Addendum D-1 iii LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 List of compliance criteria from NPDES ocean discharge permit (Order No. R8-2012-0035, Permit # CA0110604) and compliance status for each criterion in 2015-16. N/A= Not Applicable. 2-2 Table 2-2 Summary of offshore water quality compliance testing results for dissolved oxygen, pH, and transmissivity for 2015-16. 2-3 Table 2-3 Physical properties and organic contaminant concentrations of sediment samples collected at each semi-annual and annual (*) station in Summer 2015 compared to Effects Range-Median (ERM) values and regional measurements. ZID = Zone of Initial Dilution, AWM =Area Weighted Mean, NO = Not Detected, N/A= Not Applicable. 2-8 Table 2-4 Metal concentrations (mg/kg) in sediment samples collected at each semi- annual and annual (*) station in Summer 2015 compared to Effects Range- Median (ERM) values and regional measurements. ZID = Zone of Initial Dilution,AWM =Area Weighted Mean, ND = Not Detected, NA= Not Applicable. 2-9 Table 2-5 Physical properties and organic contaminant concentrations of sediment samples collected at each semi-annual station in Winter 2016 compared to Effects Range-Median (ERM) values and regional measurements. ZID = Zone of Initial Dilution,AWM =Area Weighted Mean, NO = Not Detected, N/A = Not Applicable. 2.11 Table 2-6 Metal concentrations (mg/kg) in sediment samples collected at each semi- annual station in Winter 2016 compared to Effects Range-Median (ERM) values and regional measurements. ZID = Zone of Initial Dilution, AWM = Area Weighted Mean, ND = Not Detected, NA= Not Applicable. 2-12 Table 2-7 Whole-sediment Eohaustorius estuarius (amphipod) toxicity test results for 2015-16. The home sediment represents the control; N/A= Not Applicable. 2-12 Table 2-8 Summary of infaunal community measure values for each semi-annual and annual (*)station sampled during the Summer 2015 benthic survey, including regional and Districal historical values. ZID = Zone of Initial Dilution; N/A = Not Applicable; INC = Not Calculated. 2-13 Table 2-9 Summary of infaunal community measures for each semi-annual station sampled during the Winter 2016 benthic survey, including regional and District historical values. ZID = Zone of Initial Dilution; INC = Not Calculated. 2-15 Table 2-10 Summary of epibenthic macroinvertebrate community measures for each semi-annual and annual (*) station sampled during the Summer 2015 and Winter 2016 trawl surveys, as well as District historical values. 2-17 iv List of Tables Table 2-11 Summary of demersal fish community measures for each semi-annual and annual (*) station sampled during the Summer 2015 and Winter 2016 trawl surveys, as well as District historical values. 2-19 Table 2-12 Summary statistics of tissue contaminant concentrations in selected flatfishes collected by trawling in July 2015 at Stations T1 (ouffall)and T11 (non-ouffall). NO = Not Detected. 2-21 Table 2-13 Summary statistics of muscle tissue contaminant concentrations in selected scorpaenid fishes collected by rig-fishing in September 2015 at Zones 1 (outfall) and 3 (non-outfall). NO = Not Detected; N/A= Not Applicable. 2-21 Table 3-1 Comparison of District and SCCWRP California Ocean Plan compliance determinations for dissolved oxygen for program year 2015-2016. 3-7 Table A-1 Water quality sample collection and analysis methods by parameter during 2015-16. A-2 Table A-2 Sediment collection and analysis summary during 2015-16. * = Available online at: www.epa.gov. A-6 Table A-3 Parameters measured in sediment samples during 2015-16. A-7 Table A­4 Benthic infauna sample distribution for 2015-16. A-9 Table A-5 Fish tissue handling and analysis summary during 2015-16. * = Available online at www.epa.gov; N/A= Not Applicable. A-12 Table A­6 Parameters measured in fish tissue samples during 2015-16. * = Analyzed only in rig-fish specimens. A-12 Table B-1 Depth-averaged total coliform bacteria (MPN/100 mL) collected in offshore waters and used for comparison with California Ocean Plan (COP) Water- Contact (REC-1) compliance criteria, July 2015 through June 2016. B-1 Table B-2 Depth-averaged fecal coliform bacteria counts (MPN/100 mL) collected in offshore waters and used for comparison with California Ocean Plan (COP) Water-Contact (REC-1) compliance criteria, July 2015 through June 2016. B-2 Table B-3 Depth-averaged enterocecci bacteria (MPN/100mL) collected in offshore waters and used for comparison with California Ocean Plan (COP) Water- Contact (REC-1) compliance criteria and EPA Primary Recreation Criteria in Federal Waters, July 2015 through June 2016. B-3 Table B-4 Summary of floatable material by station group observed during the 28-station grid water quality surveys, July 2015 through June 2016. Total number of station visits = 336. B-4 Table B-5 Summary of floatable material by station group observed during the REC-1 water quality surveys, July 2015 through June 2016. Total number of station visits = 134. B-4 Table B-6 Summary of monthly Core water quality parameters by season and depth strata, July 2015 to June 2016. B-5 v List of Tables Table B-7 Species richness and abundance values of the major taxonomic groups collected at each depth stratum and season during the 2015-16 infauna survey. Values represent the mean and range (in parentheses). B-7 Table B-8 Abundance of epibenthic macroinvertebrates by station and species for the Summer 2015 and Winter 2016 trawl surveys. B-8 Table B-9 Biomass (kg) of epibenthic macroinvertebrates by station and species for the Summer 2015 and Winter 2016 trawl surveys. B-9 Table B-10 Abundance of demersal fishes by station and species for the Summer 2015 and Winter 2016 trawl surveys. B-11 Table B-11 Biomass (kg)of demersal fishes by station and species for the Summer 2015 and Winter 2016 trawl surveys. B-12 Table B-12 Summary statistics of legacy District Core nearshore stations for total coliforms, fecal coliforms, and enterococci bacteria (CFU/100mL) by station and season during 2015-2016. B-13 Table B-13 Summary statistics of OCHCA nearshore stations for total coliforms, fecal coliforms, and enterococci bacteria (CFU/100mL) by station and season during 2015-2016. B-15 Table C-1 Method detection limit (MDL) for ammonium and bacteria in receiving water, July 2015—June 2016. C-2 Table C-2 Water quality ammonium QA/QC summary, July 2015—June 2016. C-3 Table C-3 Method detection limit (MDL) for PAH, chlorinated pesticide, and PCB constituents in sediments, July 2015—June 2016. C-4 Table C-4 Acceptance criteria for standard reference material SRM 1944(New York/New Jersey Waterway Sediment, National Institute of Standards and Technology) for PAH constituents in sediments, July 2015—June 2016. * = Non-certified value used for this parameter. C-5 Table C-5 Sediment EPAHs QA/QC summary, July 2015—June 2016. C-5 Table C-6 Acceptance criteria for standard reference material SRM 1944(New York/New Jersey Waterway Sediment, National Institute of Standards and Technology) for chlorinated pesticide and PCB constituents in sediments, July 2015— June 2016. * = Non-certified value used for this parameter. C-6 Table C-7 Sediment EPCB and EPesticides QA/QC summary, July 2015—June 2016. C-6 Table C-8 Method detection limit (MDL) for trace metals in sediments, July 2015— June 2016. C-7 Table C-9 Acceptance criteria for standard reference material Priority PollutnTT" /CLP Inorganic Soils— Microwave Digestion (Environmental Resource Associates) for trace metals in sediments, July 2015—June 2016. C-8 Table C-10 Sediment metals QA/QC summary, July 2015—June 2016. C-8 vi List of Tables Table C-11 Method detection limit(MDL)for dissolved sulfides,total organic carbon,grain size, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus in sediments, July 2015—June 2016. C-9 Table C-12 Sediment dissolved sulfides QA/QC summary, July 2015—June 2016. N/A= Not Applicable. C-9 Table C-13 Sediment total organic carbon QA/QC summary, July 2015—June 2016. C-9 Table C-14 Sediment grain size QA/QC summary, July 2015—June 2016. N/A = Not Applicable. C-10 Table C-15 Sediment total nitrogen QA/QC summary, July 2015—June 2016. C-10 Table C-16 Sediment total phosphorus QA/QC summary, July 2015—June 2016. C-11 Table C-17 Method detection limit (MDL) for chlorinated pesticide and PCB constituents in fish tissue, DSQ II, July 2015-June 2016. * = Reporting limit used for this parameter. C-12 Table C-18 Acceptance criteria for standard reference material SRM 1946(Lake Superior Fish Tissue; National Institute of Standards and Technology) for lipid and chlorinated pesticides and PCB constituents in fish tissue, July 2015—June 2016. * Non-certified value used for this parameter. C-13 Table C-19 Fish EPCBs and EPesticides QA/QC summary, July 2015—June 2016. C-13 Table C-20 Fish tissue percent lipid QA/QC summary, July 2015—June 2016. C-14 Table C-21 Method detection limit (MDL)and reporting limit(RL)for metals in fish tissue, July 2015—June 2016. C-14 Table C-22 Acceptance criteria for standard reference material Fish Protein Certified Reference Material (National Research Council Canada DORM-3)for metals in fish muscle tissue, July 2015—June 2016. C-14 Table C-23 Fish tissue mercury,arsenic, and selenium QA/QC summary,July 2015—June 2016. C-15 Table C-24 Percent error rates calculated for July 2015 QA samples. C-16 Table C-25 Trawl track distances and vessel speed for sampling conducted in Summer 2015 and Winter 2016. Vessel speeds outside of the CA range of 1.5-2.0 knots are denoted with a t symbol. C-18 Table D-1 Initial and corrected EDDT and EPCB values in muscle and liver tissues of selected flatfishes collected by trawling in January 2009 at Stations T1 (oulfall) and T11 (non-outfall). D-1 Table D-2 Initial and corrected EDDT and EPCB values in muscle and liver tissues of selected flatfishes collected by trawling in July 2009 at Stations T1 (outfall) and T11 (non-outfall). D-2 Table D-3 Initial and corrected EDDT and EPCB values in muscle and liver tissues of selected flatfishes collected by trawling in January 2011 at Stations T1 (oulfall) and T11 (non-oulfall). D-2 vii List of Tables Table D-4 Initial and corrected fDDT and LPCB values in muscle and liver tissues of selected flatfishes collected by trawling in August 2011 at Stations T1 (outfall) and T11 (non-outfall). Note: the initial data did not include ranges. D-3 Table D-5 Initial and corrected EDDT and FPCB values in muscle and liver tissues of selected flatfishes collected by trawling in March 2013 at Stations T1 (outfall) and T11 (non-outfall). D-3 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 Regional setting for the District's Ocean Monitoring Program including monitoring area of the program. 1-2 Figure 1-2 Annual (July—June)total (A) and 2015-16 monthly(B)total beach attendance for selected Orange County beaches (City of Huntington Beach 2016, City of Newport Beach 2016, and CDPR 2016). 1-3 Figure 1-3 Annual daily average final effluent discharge flow (blue line) and recycle flow (red line) for the District, combined discharge and recycle flows (green line), and annual population(orange line)for Orange County, California, 1975-2016 (CDF 2016). 1-4 Figure 1-4 Annual rainfall for Newport Harbor, 1975-2016. Red line represents the historical annual mean value from 1975-2016 (OCPW 2016). 1-7 Figure 1-5 Annual flow for the Santa Ana River, 1975-2016. Red line represents the historical annual mean value from 1975-2016 (USGS 2016). 1-7 Figure 2-1 Offshore water quality monitoring stations for 2015-16. 2-3 Figure 2-2 Benthic(sediment geochemistry and infauna) monitoring stations for 2015-16. 2-4 Figure 2-3 Trawl monitoring stations, as well as rig-fishing locations, for 2015-16. 2-5 Figure 2-4 Summary of mean percent compliance for dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, and light transmissivity (%T) for all compliance stations compared to reference stations, 1985-2016. 2-6 Figure 2-5 Dendrogram (top panel) and non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) plot (bottom panel) of the infauna collected at within- and non-ZID stations along the Middle Shelf Zone 2 stratum for the Summer 2015 (S) and Winter 2016(W)benlhic surveys. Stations connected by red lines in the dendrogram are not significantly differentiated based on the SIMPROF test. The 5 main clusters formed at a 42% similarity on the dendrogram are superimposed on the nMDS plot. 2-16 Figure 2-6 Dendrogram(top panel)and non-metric multidimensional scaling(nMDS)plot (bottom panel) of the epibenthic macroinvertebrates collected at outfall and non-ouffall stations along the Middle Shelf Zone 2 stratum for the Summer 2015 (S) and Winter 2016 (W)trawl surveys. Stations connected by red lines in the dendrogram are not significantly differentiated based on the SIMPROF test. The single main cluster formed at a 42% similarity on the dendrogram is superimposed on the nMDS plot. 2-18 ix List of Figures Figure 2-7 Dendrogram (top panel) and non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) plot (bottom panel) of the demersal fishes collected at outfall and non- ouffall stations along the Middle Shelf Zone 2 stratum for the Summer 2015 (S) and Winter 2016 (W) trawl surveys. Stations connected by red lines in the dendrogram are not significantly differentiated based on the SIMPROF test. The two main clusters formed at a 68% similarity on the dendrogram is superimposed on the nMDS plot. 2-20 Figure 3-1 Offshore and Nearshore (surfzone)water quality monitoring stations for 2015-16. 3.3 Figure 3-2 Central Bight Water Quality Group monitoring stations for 2015-16. 3.4 Figure A-1 Water quality monitoring stations and zones used for compliance determinations. A-4 Figure C-1 Quality assurance plots of otter trawl paths in relation to a 100-m circle (red dashes)surrounding each nominal station position, July and August 2015. C-19 Figure C-2 Quality assurance plots of trawl depth per haul for otter trawl stations, July and August 2015. Upper and lower limit lines are 310% of nominal trawl depth. C-20 Figure C-3 Quality assurance plots of otter trawl paths in relation to a 100-m circle (red dashes)surrounding each nominal station position, January and March 2016. C-21 Figure C-4 Quality assurance plots of trawl depth per haul for otter trawl stations,January and March 2016. Upper and lower limit lines are 310% of nominal trawl depth C-22 x ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The following individuals are acknowledged for their contributions to the Marine Monitoring Volume of the 2015-16 Annual Report: Orange County Sanitation District Management: Jim Colston...........................................Director, Environmental Services Department Ron Coss.........................Manager, Laboratory, Monitoring, and Compliance Division Dr. Jeffrey L.Armstrong............Environmental Supervisor, Ocean Monitoring Section Ocean Monitoring Team: George Robertson...............................................................................Senior Scientist Dr. Danny Tang...............................................................................................Scientist Michael Mengel......................................................Principal Environmental Specialist Kelvin Barwick........................................................Principal Environmental Specialist Ken Sakamoto...........................................................Senior Environmental Specialist Hai Nguyen................................................................Senior Environmental Specialist Robert Gamber..........................................................Senior Environmental Specialist Laura Terriquez..........................................................Senior Environmental Specialist Ernest Ruckman........................................................Senior Environmental Specialist Benjamin Ferraro.......................................................Senior Environmental Specialist Geoffrey Daly.........................................................................Environmental Specialist MarkKibby...............................................................................................Boat Captain SarahZito............................................................................................................Intern Laboratory Team: Miriam Angold, Jim Campbell, Dr. Sam Choi, Kim Christensen,Arturo Diaz, Joel Finch, Elaine Galvez, Michelle Kim,Thang Mai, Joe Manzella, Lori McKinley, Ryan McMullin, Dawn Myers, Canh Nguyen,Thomas Nguyen,Paulo Pavia,Vanh Phonsiri,Anthony Pimentel, Diane Poeske, Luis Ruiz, Dr. Yu-Li Tsai, Michael Von Winkelmann, Kathy Waldron, Norman Whiteman, and Brandon Yokoyama. IT and LIMS Data Support: Matthew Garchow. Contributing Authors: Kelvin Barwick, Dr. Sam Choi, Robert Gamber, Thang Mai, Joe Manzella, Michael Mengel, Dawn Myers, Hai Nguyen, Vanh Phonsiri, Anthony Pimentel, George Robertson, Ernest Ruckman, Ken Sakamoto, Dr. Danny Tang, Laura Terriquez, and Dr. Yu-Li Tsai. A This page intentionally left blank. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Orange County Sanitation District (District) conducts extensive ocean monitoring to evaluate potential environmental and public health risks from its discharge of highly treated wastewater into the coastal waters off Huntington Beach and Newport Beach, California. The effluent is released in 60 m of water, 7 km offshore. The data collected are used to determine compliance with receiving water conditions as specified in the District's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit (R8-2012-0035, CA0110604), jointly issued in 2012 by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region IX and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Region 8. This report focuses on monitoring results and conclusions from July 2015 through June 2016. WATER QUALITY Overall, the public health risks and measured environmental effects to the receiving water continue to be small. Consistent with previous years, minor changes in measured water quality parameters related to the discharge of wastewater to the coastal ocean were detected. Plume-related changes in temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, pH, and light transmissivity was measurable beyond the initial mixing zone (<2 km) during some surveys. None of these changes were determined to be environmentally significant; all values were within the ranges of natural variability for the study area, and reflected seasonal and yearly changes of large-scale regional influences. The limited observable plume effects occurred primarily at depth, even during the winter when stratification was weakest. All state and federal offshore bacterial standards were met during all surveys. In summary, staff concluded that the discharge in 2015-16 did not greatly affect the receiving water environment and that beneficial uses were protected and maintained. SEDIMENT QUALITY Sediment parameter values were comparable between within-ZID(zone of initial dilution)and non-ZID station groups. Values were below levels of biological concern (ERM values) at all stations. Whole sediment toxicity tests showed no measurable toxicity. These results, coupled with the presence of healthy fish and invertebrate communities both near and away from the outfall (see below), suggest good sediment quality in the monitoring area. BIOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES Infaunal Communities The infaunal communities were similar within the monitoring area, with comparable community measure values and equivalent species assemblages at within-ZID and non-ZID stations. Theinfaunal community at all shelf-stations in both summer and winter surveys can be classified as reference condition based on their Benthic Response Index and Infaunal Trophic Index values. These multiple lines of evidence demonstrate that the outfall discharge had an overall negligible effect on the benthic community structure within the monitoring area. Demersal Fishes and Epibenthic Macroinvertebrates Results for the epibenthic macroinvertebrates (EMIs) and demersal fishes were generally consistent with past findings. Community measure values of the EMIs and fishes were generally comparable between outfall and non-outfall stations. Furthermore,fish communities at all stations were classified ES-1 Executive Summary as reference condition based on their low Fish Response Index values. These results indicated that the ouffall area was not degraded and that it supported normal fish and EMI populations. Tissue Contaminants in Fish Muscle and liver tissue concentrations of mercury and other chlorinated pesticides were similar in demersal fishes caught by otter trawl at ouffall and non-outfall stations. Concentrations of mercury, arsenic, selenium, DDT, PCB, and other chlorinated pesticides in tissues of sport fishes caught by hook-and-line at ouffall and non-ouffall locations were below federal and state human consumption guidelines. These results demonstrated that the ouffall is not an epicenter of disease due to the bioaccumulation of contaminants in fish tissue and suggest there is little risk from consuming fish from the monitored areas. Fish Health Fishes appeared normal in both color and odor. The lack of tumors, fin erosion, and skin lesions showed that fishes in the monitoring area were healthy. External parasites and other external abnormalities occurred in less than 1% of the fishes collected, comparable to Southern California Bight background levels. These results were consistent with previous years and indicate that the ouffall is not an epicenter of disease. Liver Histopathology Forthe 2015-16 monitoring period,there were no differences in Hornyhead Turbot liver histopathology among the outfall and non-ouffall stations. In contrast, English Sole samples at the ouffall exhibited slightly more liver tissue damage than those at the non-outfall station. However, most English Sole samples at the ouffall were not classified as irreparable. These results further demonstrate that the ouffall is not an epicenter of disease. CONCLUSION In summary, California Ocean Plan criteria for water quality were met. State and federal bacterial standards were also met at offshore stations. Sediment quality was not degraded by loading of measured chemical contaminants or by physical changes from the discharge of wastewater solids. This was corroborated by the absence of sediment toxicity in controlled laboratory tests and the presence of normal infaunal communities throughout the monitoring area. Fish and trawl invertebrate communities in the monitoring area were also healthy and diverse. Federal and state fish consumption guidelines were met. Altogether, these results indicate that the receiving waters environment was not degraded. All permit compliance criteria were met, and environmental and human health were protected. ES-2 CHAPTER 1 The Ocean Monitoring Program INTRODUCTION The Orange County Sanitation District(District)operates 2 wastewater treatment facilities,one located in Fountain Valley (Plant 1) and the other in Huntington Beach (Plant 2), California. The District discharges treated wastewater to the Pacific Ocean through a submarine outfall located offshore of the Santa Ana River Mouth (Figure 1-1). This discharge is regulated by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region IX and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Region 8 under the Federal Clean WaterAct,the California Ocean Plan, and the RWQCB Basin Plan. Specific discharge and monitoring requirements are contained in a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued jointly by the EPA and the RWQCB (Order No. R8-2012- 0035, NPDES Permit No. CA0110604)on June 15, 2012. Southern California's Mediterranean climate and convenient beach access results in high, year- round public use of beaches. For example, although the highest visitation occurs during the summer months, winter beach usage within the District's study area can exceed 2 million visitors per month (City of Huntington Beach 2016, City of Newport Beach 2016, CDPR 2016). As a result, a large percentage of the local economies rely on beach use and its associated recreational activities, which are highly dependent upon water quality conditions (Turbow and Jiang 2004, Leeworthy and Wiley 2007). In 2012, Orange County's coastal economy accounted for $3.8 billion (2%) of the county's Gross Domestic Product (NOAA 2015). It has been estimated that a single day of beach closure at Boise Chica State Beach would result in an economic loss of$7.3 million (WHOI 2003). For 2015-16, total beach attendance for Boise Chita State Beach, Huntington Beach City Beach, Huntington Beach State Beach, Newport Beach City Beach, and Crystal Cove State Beach was over 26 million (Figure 1-2a; City of Huntington Beach 2016, City of Newport Beach 2016, CDPR 2016). Total monthly visitations ranged from 934,544 in December 2015 to 4,654,578 in July 2015 (Figure 1-2b). While the 2015-16 seasonal visitation patterns were similar to those of previous years(highest in the summer, lowest in the winter), several months had greater than average monthly visitation due to unseasonal high air temperatures (WRCC 2016). March 2015, for example, had nearly twice the average attendance, which may be attributed to the record average high temperature for the month (NOAA 2016). DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT'S OPERATIONS The District's mission is to safely collect, process, recycle, and dispose of treated wastewater while protecting human health and the environment in accordance with federal, state, and local laws and regulations. These objectives are achieved through extensive industrial pre-treatment (source control), secondary treatment processes, biosolids management, and water reuse programs. 1-1 The Ocean Monitoring Program amrk Line p -7...... s w° District Service Area v.P:�m�ia Hun intxon 4/ gernen.- 0 perel Treatment o°n lent 2 aw,de.aen e,u. ewpo noXii` o:n:.`,10, x n e �..o. aiw Outtalk, .� / Distriefs Monitoring Area t^pant' •/-/L aO WP ONtell OD9D MartM1 2017 am Figure 1-1 Regional setting for the District's Ocean Monitoring Program including monitoring area of the program. Together, the District's 2 wastewater treatment plants receive domestic sewage from approximately 80% of the county's 3.2 million residents and industrial wastewater from 688 permitted businesses within its service area. Under normal operations, the treated wastewater (effluent) is discharged through a 120-in(305-cm)diameter ocean outfall,which extends 4.4 miles(7.1 km)from the Huntington Beach shoreline(Figure 1-1). The last 1.1 miles (1.8 km) of the outfall consists of a diffuser with 503 ports that discharge the treated effluent at an approximate depth of 197 ft(60 m). Since 1999, the District has accepted a total of 8.6 billion gallons of dry-weather urban runoff from various locations in North and Central Orange County that would otherwise have entered the ocean without treatment (OCSD 2016). The collection and treatment of dry-weather runoff, began as a regional effort to reduce beach bacterial pollution associated with chronic dry-weather flows, has grown to include accepting diversions of high selenium flows to protect Orange County's waterways. There are currently 19 active diversions including storm water pump stations, the Santa Ana River, several creeks, and 3 flood control channels. The diversions are owned and operated by the City of Huntington Beach (n=11), the Public Works Department of Orange County (3), the Irvine Ranch Water District(2), the City of Newport Beach (2), and PH Finance, LLC(1). For 2015-16, the diverted monthly average daily discharge flows ranged from 0.32-1.21 million gallons per day(MGD)(1.2-4.6 x 106 L/day)with an average daily discharge of 1.07 MGD (4.0 x 106 L/day). 1-2 The Ocean Monitoring Program a) 30,000,000 25,000,000 U � 20,000,000 O z 15,000,000 Q L m 10,000,000 00 5,000,000 0 `L ^N ,v'y ry�^A,O�'LArye rye ,.W rye �6'� .9l ryp^ ryON rypN �,v^1 �,vK ryON'Y Year W b) 6,000,000 1wn ee n-mie',ni n- 5,000,000LI N�' 4,000,0003,000.000 Q U tg 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 �5 ^h �b n5 �5 Nh ^6 ^6 �6 �6 N6 N6 p�g,)o ya�P ,Lo 20°^0 ,�� f0P "m'°P ,co "P pQ`,tP 0P 5P Month ■ Huntington Beach City Beach ■ Newton Beach City Beach ■ Bolse Chice State Beach ■ Huntington Beach State Beach . Crystal Cove State Beach Long-term Average (July 2001—.1une 2016) Figure 1-2 Annual (July—June) total (A) and 2015-16 monthly (B) total beach attendance for selected Orange County beaches (City of Huntington Beach 2016, City of Newport Beach 2016, and CDPR 2016). 1-3 The Ocean Monitoring Program The District has a long history of providing treated effluent to the Orange County Water District(OCWD) for water reclamation starting with Water Factory 21 in the late 1970s. Since July of 1986, 3-10 MGD (1.1-3.8 x 107 Uday) of the final effluent has been provided to the OCWD where it received further (tertiary) treatment to remove residual solids in support of the Green Acres Project (GAP). OCWD provides this water for a variety of uses including public landscape irrigation (e.g., freeways, golf courses)and for use as a saltwater intrusion barrier in the local aquifer OCWD manages. In 2007-08, the District began diverting additional flows to OCWD for the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) totaling 35 MGD (1.3 x 101 Uday). Over time, the average GAP and GWRS diversions increased to 68 MGD (2.6 x 108 Uday) in 2008-09, 84 MGD (3.2 x 108 Uday) in 2013-14, and 124 MGD (4.7 x 108 L/day) in 2015-16 (Figure 1-3). 300.0 4.0 250.0 3.5 0 a.0 F zoo.o 2.5 ot 150.0 2.0 5. 1.5 0 0 100.0 .0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Year Figure 1-3 Annual daily average final effluent discharge flow (blue line) and recycle flow (red line) for the District, combined discharge and recycle flows (green line), and annual population (orange line)for Orange County, California, 1975-2016 (CDF 2016). During 2015-16, the 2 wastewater treatment plants received and processed influent volumes averaging 183 MGD (6.9 x 108 L/day). Treatment plant processes achieved a 98% reduction in suspended solids concentration. After diversions to the GAP and GWRS and the return of OCWD's reject flows (e.g., brines), the District discharged an average of 92 MGD (3.4 x 108 L/day) of treated wastewater to the ocean (Figure 1-3). Peak flow [101.4 MGD (3.8 x 108 L/day)] occurred in June 2016,which was well below the historical peak flow of 550 MGD(2.1 x 108 Uday)that occurred during an extreme rainfall even in the winter of 1996. Seasonal and interannual differences in flow volumes are due to the variability in the amount of local water conservation efforts, rainfall, infiltration of the treatment system by runoff, and reclamation. Prior to 1990, the annual wastewater discharge volumes gradually increased with population growth within the District's service area (Figure 1-3). However, wastewater flows decreased in 1991-92 due to drought conditions and water conservation measures. Since then combined effluent and water reclamation flows have remained relatively stable despite continued population growth. Since 2007, average discharge flows have declined dramatically due to the implementation of the GWRS. REGULATORY SETTING FOR THE OCEAN MONITORING PROGRAM The District's permit includes requirements to monitor influent, effluent, and the receiving water. Effluent flows, constituent concentrations, and toxicity are monitored to determine compliance with permit limits and to provide data for interpreting changes to receiving water conditions. Wastewater impacts to coastal receiving waters are evaluated by the District's Ocean Monitoring Program (OMP) 1-4 The Ocean Monitoring Program based on 3 inter-related components:Core monitoring,Strategic Process Studies(SPS),and Regional monitoring. In addition, the District conducts other special studies not required under the existing NPDES permit. Information obtained from each of these program components is used to further the understanding of the coastal ocean environment and improve interpretations of the monitoring data. These program elements are summarized below. The Core monitoring program was designed to measure compliance with permit conditions and for temporal trend analysis. Four major components comprise the program: (1) coastal oceanography and water quality, (2) sediment quality, (3) benthic infaunal community health, and (4) demersal fish and epibenthic macroinvertebrate community health, which include fish tissue contaminant concentrations. The District conducts SPS to provide information about relevant coastal and ecotoxicological processes that are not addressed by Core monitoring. These studies have included evaluating the physical and chemical processes that affect the fate and transport of the discharged wastewater, tracking wastewater particles, contributing to the development of ocean circulation models, and studying the effects of endocrine disrupting compounds on fish. Since 1994, the District has participated in 5 regional monitoring studies of environmental conditions within the Southern California Bight (SCB): 1994 Southern California Bight Pilot Project, Bight'98, Bight'03, Bight'08, and Bight'13. The District has played an integral role in these regional projects, carrying out program design, sampling, quality assurance, sample analysis, data analysis, and report writing. Results from these efforts provide information that is used by individual dischargers, local, state, and federal resource managers, researchers, and the public to improve understanding of regional environmental conditions.This provides a larger-scale perspective for comparisons with data collected from local, individual point sources. Program documents, data, and reports can be found at the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project's (SCCWRP)website (http://sccwrp.org). Another long-term regional program that began in 1997, is the Central Bight Water Quality Program. This is a quarterly, collaborative regional water quality sampling effort along with the City of Oxnard, the City of Los Angeles, the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles, and the City of San Diego. Other collaborative projects organized by SCCWRP include "Characteristics of Effluents from Large Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facilities" and "Comparison of Mass Emissions among Sources in the Southern California Bight." Both of these projects involved analyses of historical data from large publicly owned treatment works(POTWs), including the District. Finally,the District has been working with the Southern California Coastal Ocean Observing System (http://www.sccoos.org) to provide the public with historical and ongoing water quality data. The District also partnered with SCCWRP, other local POTWs, and the Orange County Health Care Agency in conducting studies not mandated by the NPDES permit. Recent examples include continuing research on source tracking of bacterial contamination and evaluating rapid tests for fecal indicator bacteria. The District's OMP has contributed substantially to the understanding of water quality and environmental conditions along the beaches and in the area adjacent to the submarine ouffall. This monitoring program has generated a vast amount of data that provides a broad understanding of both natural and anthropogenic processes that affect coastal oceanography and marine biology. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The District's ocean monitoring area is adjacent to one of the most highly urbanized areas in the United States, covering most of the San Pedro Shelf and extending off the shelf (Figure 1-1). The shelf is composed primarily of soft sediments (sands with sills and clays)and inhabited by biological communities typical of these environments. The seafloor increases in depth gradually from the shoreline to a depth of approximately 262 ft (80 m), after which the depth increases rapidly as it 1-5 The Ocean Monitoring Program slopes down to the open basin. The outfall diffuser lies at about 60 m depth on the shelf between the Newport and San Gabriel submarine canyons, located southeast and northwest, respectively. The area southeast of the shelf is characterized by a much narrower shelf and deeper water offshore (Figure 1-1). The 120-inch outfall represents one of the largest artificial reefs in this coastal region and supports communities typical of hard substrates that would not otherwise be found in the monitoring area(CDFG 1989, OCSD 2000). Togetherwith the District's 78-inch outfall, approximately 1.1 x 106 ft2 (102,193 m2) of seafloor was converted from a flat, sandy habitat into a raised, hard- bottom substrate. Conditions within the District's monitoring area are affected by large regional-scale current patterns that influence the water characteristics and the direction of water flow along the Orange County coastline. Locally,the predominant low-frequency current flows in the monitoring area are alongshore (i.e., either upcoast or downcoast) with minor across-shelf(i.e., toward the beach)transport (OCSD 1997, 1998, 2004,2011; SAIC 2001, 2009,2011). The specific direction of the flows varies with depth and is subject to reversals over time periods of days to weeks (SAIC 2011). Other natural oceanographic processes, such as upwelling and eddies, also influence the characteristics of receiving waters on the San Pedro Shelf. Tidal flows, currents, and internal waves mix and transport the District's wastewater discharge with coastal waters and resuspended sediments. Tidal currents in the study region are relatively weak compared to lower frequency currents, which are responsible for transporting material over long distances (OCSD 2001, 2004). Combined, these processes contribute to the variability of seawater movement observed within the monitoring area. Episodic storms, drought, and climatic cycles influence environmental conditions and biological communities within the monitoring area. For example, storm water runoff has a large influence on sediment movement in the region (Brownlie and Taylor 1981, Warrick and Millikan 2003). Major storms contribute large amounts of contaminants to the ocean and can generate waves capable of extensive shoreline erosion, sediment resuspension, and movement of sediments along the coast as well as offshore. Some of the greatest effects are produced by wet weather cycles, periods of drought, and periodic oceanographic events, such as El Nino and La Nina conditions. An understanding of the effects of the inputs from rivers and watersheds, particularly non-point source runoff, is important for evaluating spatial and temporal trends in the environmental quality of coastal areas. River flows, together with urban storm water runoff, represent significant, episodic sources of freshwater, sediments,suspended particles, nutrients, bacteria and other contaminants to the coastal area (Hood 1993, Grant at al. 2001, Warwick at al. 2007), although recent studies indicate that the spatial impact of these effects may be limited (Ahn at al. 2005, Reifel at al. 2009). While many of the materials supplied to coastal waters by rivers are essential to natural biogeochemical cycles, an excess or a deficit may have important environmental consequences. In 2015-16, total rainfall for Newport Harbor was 7.5 inches (190 mm) (Orange County, CA Department of Public Works 2016), well below the long-term historical mean of 10.9 inches (277 mm) (Figure 1-4). As a result, annual flows in the Santa Ana River were below average (Figure 1-5), which had significant impacts on local beach bacteria levels (Heal the Bay 2016). Nearshore coastal waters of the SCB receive wastes from a variety of human-related sources, such as wastewater discharges, dredged material disposal, oil and gas activities, boat/vessel discharges, urban and agricultural runoff, and atmospheric fallout. The majority of municipal and industrial sources are located between Point Dume and San Mateo Point (Figure 1-1) while discharges from the Los Angeles, San Gabriel, and Santa Ana Rivers are responsible for substantial surface water contaminant inputs to the SCB (Schafer and Gossett 1988, SCCWRP 1992, Schiff and Tiefenthaler 2001). A goal of the District's OMP is to provide an understanding of the effects of its wastewater discharge on beneficial uses of the ocean. However, distinguishing the effects of the District's discharge from 1-6 The Ocean Monitoring Program 30 2$ t 20 U C N 10 5 0 ^9^y'Ie9��091�o9e^�ti9���o-90y�e90^�e90gmo99^gti��go-�y9e�'^g09 9o ^Aryo°�o-ryo�y,o°^boo^^�tiry° ?o^yc Year a� Figure 1-4 Annual rainfall for Newport Harbor, 1975-2016. Red line represents the historical annual mean value from 1975-2016 (OCPW 2016). 1,000,000 "'o 0 0 m,000 s 1,000 c 100 LL 10 1 uO yob '10 ^�,^y0'41 l �p'1. ^g� ^AT ^g1 ♦°'� ^� ^g0 ^90°j' ^g¢ ^Aa ^ya ryoo o, e ry�0 �&" ryes ryp^ ryp� Year Figure 1-5 Annual flow for the Santa Ana River, 1975-2016. Red line represents the historical annual mean value from 1975-2016 (I ISGS 2016). those of natural and other human influences is difficult, especially as the "signal" (impact) from the ouffall has been greatly reduced since the 1970s(Figure 1-3). The complexities of the environmental setting and related difficulties in assigning a cause or source to a pollution event are the rationale for the District's extensive monitoring program. This report presents OMP compliance determinations for data collected from July 2015 through June 2016. Compliance determinations were made by comparing OMP findings to the criteria specified in the District's NPDES permit. Any related special studies or regional monitoring efforts are also documented. In September 2016, the District's laboratory staff discovered an error in percent lipid calculations for Hornyhead Turbot and English Sole samples collected by trawling between January 2009 and March 2013, which affected the lipid-normalized EDDT and FPCB tissue data. An errata report containing information about how these errors were handled can be found in Appendix D. 1-7 The Ocean Monitoring Program REFERENCES Ahn, J.H., S.B. Grunt, C.Q. Surbeck, P.M. Digiacomo, N.P. Nezlin, and S. Jiang. 2005. Coastal water quality impact of stormwater runoff from an urban watershed in Southern California. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39:5940-5953. Brownie, W.D. and B.D. Taylor. 1981. Sediment management for Southern California mountains, coastal plains, and shorelines. Part C. Coastal Sediment Delivery by Major Rivers in Southern California. Environmental Quality Laboratory Report 17C. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA. Califomia State Department of Finance (CDF). 2016. Demographic Reports. California County Population Estimates and Components of Change by Year - July 1, 2010-2016. http://www.dof.ce.gov/ Forecasting/Demographics/Estimates/E-2/2010-16/. Accessed 01/05/2017. Califomia Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 1989. A Guide to Artificial Reefs in Southern California. Robert D. Lewis and Kimberly K. McGee. Califomia State Department of Parks and Recreation (CDPR) - Orange Coast District. 2016. State Beach Attendance Statistics. Unpublished data. City of Huntington Beach - Fire DepartmenUMarine Safety Division. 2016. Huntington Beach Attendance Statistics. Unpublished data. City of NewportBeach-Fire Department/Marine Operations Division. 2016. Newport Beach Monthly Statistics. Unpublished data. Grant, S.B., B.F. Sanders,A.B. Boehm,J.A. Redman, J.H. Kim, R.D. Mrse,A.K. Chu, M. Gouldin, C.D. McGee, N.A.Gardiner, B.H.Jones,J.Svejkovsky,G.V.Leipzig,and A.Brown. 2001. Generation of enterococci bacteria in a coastal saltwater marsh and its impacts on surf zone water quality. Environ. Sci.Technol. 35:2407-2416. Heal the Bay. 2016. 2015-16 Beach Report Card. 70 p. https://www.healthebay.org/sitesldefaulttfiles/ BRC_2016_final.pdf. Accessed 12M2016. Hood, D. 1993. Ecosystem relationships. In: Ecology of the Southern California Bight: A Synthesis and Interpretation (M.D. Dailey, D.J. Reish, and J.W. Anderson - Eds.). University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. p. 782-835. Leeworthy,V.R.and P.C.Wiley. 2007. Economic Value and Impact of Water Quality Change for Long Beach in Southern California. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Report.23 p. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2015. The National Significance of California's Ocean Economy. Final Report prepared for the NOAA Office for Coastal Management. https://coast. noaa.gov/data/digitalwastlpdf/california-ocean-economy.pdf. Accessed 11/30/2016. NOAA. 2016. National Temperature and Precipitation Maps. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/us- maps/1/201503#us-maps-select. Accessed 12/5/2016. Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). 1997. Annual Report, July 1995-June 1996. Marine Monitoring. Fountain Valley, CA. OCSD. 1998. Annual Report,July 1996-June 1997. Marine Monitoring. Fountain Valley, CA. OCSD. 2000. Annual Report,July 1998-June 1999. Marine Monitoring. Fountain Valley, CA. OCSD. 2001. Annual Report,July 1999-June 2000. Marine Monitoring. Fountain Valley, CA. OCSD. 2004. Annual Report,July 2002-June 2003. Marine Monitoring. Fountain Valley, CA. OCSD. 2011. Annual Report, July 2009-June 2010. Marine Monitoring. Fountain Valley, CA. OCSD. 2016. Annual Report, July 2015-June 2016. Environmental Compliance Program Pretreatment Program. Fountain Valley, CA. 1-8 The Ocean Monitoring Program Orange County Department of Public Works (OCPW). 2016. Historic Rainfall Data. Station 88 - Newport Beach Harbor Master. http://ocwatersheds.com/rainrecords/rainfalidata/historic-data/rainfall-data. Accessed 11/15/2016. Reifel, K.M., S.C. Johnson, P.M. DiGiacomo, M.J. Mengel, N.P. Nezlin, J.A. Warrick, and B.H. Jones. 2009. Impacts of stonnwater runoff in the Southern California Bight-Relationships among plume constituents. Cont. Shelf Res. 29:1821-1835. Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). 2001. Strategic Processes Study#1: Plume Tracking- Ocean Currents. Prepared for the Orange County Sanitation District. Fountain Valley, CA. 68 pp. SAIC. 2009. Orange County Sanitation District Ocean Current Studies: Analyses of Inter-and Inlra-Annual Variability in Coastal Currents. Final Report prepared for the Orange County Sanitation District. Fountain Valley, CA. 62 p. SAIC. 2011. Statistical Analysis of Multi-Year Currents at Inshore Locations in San Pedro Bay. Final Report prepared for Orange County Sanitation District. Fountain Valley, CA. 36 p. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP). 1992. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Biennial Report 1990-91 and 1991-92 (J.N. Cross and C. Francisco- Eds.). Long Beach, CA. Schafer, H.A.and R.W.Gossett. 1988. Characteristics of storm water runoff from the Los Angeles and Ventura Basins. Technical Report Number 221. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Long Beach, CA. 58 p. Schiff, K. and L. Tiefenlhaler. 2001. Anthropogenic versus natural mass emissions from an urban watershed. In: Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Annual Report, 1999-2000(S.B.Weisberg and D. Elmore-Eds.). Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Westminster, CA. p. 63-70. Turbow D.T. and L.S. Jiang. 2004. Impacts of beach closure events on perception of swimming related health risks in Orange County, California. Mar. Pollut. Bull.48:312-316. United States Geological Survey(USGS). 2016. Santa Ana River: USGS,5th Street Station, Santa Ana,http:// waterdata.usgs.gov/usa/nwis/uv?site-no=11078000. Accessed 11/16/2016. Warrick, J.A. and J.D. Milliken. 2003. Hyperpycnal sediment discharge from semiarid southern California rivers: Implications for coastal sediment budgets. Geology. 31:781-784. Warrick,J.A.,DiGiacomo,P.M.,Weisberg,S.B.,Nezlin,N.P.,Mengel,M.,Jones,B.H.,Ohlmann,J.C.,Washburn, L., Terrill, E.J., and K.L. Farnsworth. 2007. River plume patterns and dynamics within the Southern California Bight. Cont. Shelf Res. 27:2427-2448. Western Regional Climate Center(WRCC). 2016. Historic Air Temperature Data. Station 04788-Santa Ana Fire Station. http://www.wrco.dri.edu/ogi-bin/cl!MAIN.pl?ca7888. Accessed 12115/2016. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute (WHOI). 2003. An Inventory of California Coastal Economic Sectors. http://www.whoi.edu/mpcweb/research/NOPP/California/20region/20progress/20report/20Jan03. pdf. Accessed 1113012016. 1-9 This page intentionally left blank. CHAPTER 2 Compliance Determinations ,�.F�.YW7 INTRODUCTION This chapter provides compliance results for the 2015-16 monitoring year for the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) Ocean Monitoring Program (OMP). The program includes sample collection, analysis, and data interpretation to evaluate potential impacts of wastewater discharge on the following receiving water characteristics: • Bacterial • Physical • Chemical • Biological • Radioactivity Each of these characteristics have specific criteria (Table 2-1) for which permit compliance must be determined each monitoring year based on the Federal Clean Water Act, the California Ocean Plan (COP), and the Regional Water Quality Control Board Basin Plan. The Core OMP sampling locations include 28 offshore water quality stations, 68 benlhic stations to assess sediment chemistry and bottom-dwelling communities, 14 trawl stations to evaluate demersal fish and macroinvertebrate communities, and 2 rig-fishing zones for assessing human health risk from the consumption of sport fishes (Figures 2-1 to 2-3). Monitoring frequencies varied by component, and ranged from 2-5 days per week for surfzone water quality to annual assessments of fish health and tissue analyses. WATER QUALITY Offshore bacteria The majority(70-93%;n=699)of fecal indicator bacteria(FIB)counts collected at the 8 REC-1 stations were below the method detection limit (MDL) of 10 MPN/100 mL leading to most depth-averaged values being below detection(Tables B-1 to B-3). The highest density observed for any single sample for total coliforms, fecal coliforms, and enterococci was 670, 92, and 52 MPN/100 mL, respectively. Compliance for all 3 FIB were achieved 100%for both state and federal criteria, indicating no impact of bacteria to offshore receiving waters. Floating Particulates and Oil and Grease There were no observations of oils and grease or floating particles of sewage origin at any offshore or nearshore station in 2015-16 (Tables B-4 and B-5). Therefore, compliance was achieved. 2-1 Compliance Determinations Table 2-1 List of compliance criteria from NPDES ocean discharge permit (Order No. R8-2012- 0035, Permit # CA0110604) and compliance status for each criterion in 2015-16. N/A= Not Applicable. Criteria Criteria Met BavYenal Characteristics V.A.to.For the Ocean Plan Water-Contad Standards.rural colifodn density shall not exceed a 30day Geometric Mean of 1,000 per 100 mL nor a single sample maximum of 10,000 per 100 hi The aml coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 par 100 mL Yes when the single sample maximum fecal coliformi WlifOnn ratlo exceeds 0.1. V.Ale.For the Ocean Plan Water-Contact Standards,feral colifoan density shall not exceed a 30-day Geometric Mean of 200 per Yes 100 mL nor a single sample maximum of 400 per 100 mL. VA.fa.For Me Ocean Plan Water-Contact Standards.Entemooaous density shall nor exceed a 3 ay Geometric Mean of 35 per 100 Yes mL nor a single sample maximum of 104 per 100 ml- VA1.b.Far Me USEPA Primary Recreation Criteria in Federal Waters,Entemiccces density shall not exceed a 30 day Geometric Mean(par 100 mL)a 35 nor a single sample maximum(per 100 mL)of 104 for designated baring beach,158 for modemm Yes use,276 for light use,and 501 far infrequent use. V.A1us.For the Ocean Plan Shellfish Hammering$tandems,the median total coliform densityshall not exceed 70 per 100 mL,and not NIA more than 10 percent of the samples shall exceed 230 per 100 ml- Physical Characteristics V.A.2a.Floating particulates and grease and all shall not be visible. Yes VA2.b.The discharge of waste shall not cause assthedcally undesirable discoloration of Me ocean surface. Yes V.A.2c.Natural light shall not be signOlcantly reduced at any point outside the shall dilution zone as a result of the discharge of waste. Yes V.A2d.The rate of deposition or inert solids and the characteristics of inert solids in ocean sediments shall not be changed such Met Yes benric communities are degraded. Chemical Characteristics V.A.3.a.The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not at any time be depressed more than 10 percent from Mat which occurs naturally, Yes as the result of the diacharge of oxygen demanding waste materials. V A.3 b.The pH shall not be changed at any time more Man 0.2 units ham rat which occurs naturally Yes VA3.c.The dissolved sulfide concentration of waters in and near sediments shall not be significantly increased above Nat present Yes under natural conditions. V.A3A.The concentration of substarces,art forth in Chapter ll,Table B of Me Ocean Plan,in marine sediments shall not W increased Yes to levels which would degrade indigenous biota. V.A.3a.The concentration of organic materials in marine sediments shall not be increased to levels which would degrade marine Ims. Yes V.A.V.Nutrient materials shall not cause objectionable aquatic growths or degrade indigenous biota. Yes V A 3 g.The concentrators of substrnces,set forth In Chapter II,Table B of Me Ocean Plan,shall nil be exceeded In the area within Yes Me waste field where initial dilution Is completed. Emitter al Cherammauss V.A4.a.Marine communities,including vertebrate invertebrate,and plant credos,shall not be degraded. Yes V.A4.b.The natural taste,odor,and color of fish,shellfish,or other marine resoumesused for human consumption shall not be altered Yes VA4.c.The concentration of organic materials in fish,shellfish,or other marine resources used for human consumption shall not Yes bicaccumulate b levels that are harmful to human beast. VA5. Discharge of radioactive waste shall not degrade marine lRe. Yes Ocean Discoloration and Transparency The water clarity standards were met 100% and 99.8%h of the time for Zone A and B station groups, respectively (Table 2-2). Overall compliance was met 99.9% of the time for all stations combined. Compliance was slightly higher than the previous year's value of 97.4% and was well within the annual ranges since 1985 (Figure 2-4). All transmissivity values (Table B-6) were within natural ranges of variability to which marine organisms are exposed (OCSD 1996a). Hence, there were no impacts from the wastewater discharge relative to ocean discoloration at any offshore station. 2-2 Compliance Determinations Hu,ningto wmi eaun x4m r OT'p mz 2lrao x.. .h oam •, e 5 __—__--- _ xesx• v ' 2xzz' o 24064 zzv >ms' z xzae' u,oe' m r _ IR"il zzmClez ocsp march xan • ^^ ^,•^_�°, Figure 2-1 Offshore water quality monitoring stations for 2015-16. Table 2-2 Summary of offshore water quality compliance testing results for dissolved oxygen, pH, and transmissivity for 2015-16. Number of Number of Percent Number Percent ParameterObservations Out-ef-Range Out-ef-Range Ouf, 'Canplianca Oufo'Cornplimue Occurrences Occurrences Zone A Shlboms Dla.Ned Oxygen 483 42 8.7 2 OA pH 483 8 1.9 2 OA %Tremmisslvity 483 197 40.8 0 0.0 Zone B Btaxicme Dissolved Oxygen 467 77 16.5 8 1] pH 487 5 1.1 1 0.2 %Transmissivity 467 111 23.8 1 0.2 Totes(Zom,A and Zone B Saloons combined) Dissolved Oxygen 950 119 125 10 IA pH 950 13 1A 3 0.3 %Traremissivby 950 308 32A 1 0.1 2-3 Compliance Determinations 74 •4 *76 ]e 80 e] n • �..nn.,aia,z m ]e-o,m 1 co m 20'0, 1 11. 37, :4 zo• � •Y • . iz •ee 21 .41 41 1 2 a rcm • ' Hnnual3laliona� 99� OCSO MarcA 31117 • flemunnuel9 ertons�o-29� Figure 2-2 Benthic (sediment geochemistry and infauna) monitoring stations for 2015-16. Dissolved Oxygen (DO) In 2015-16, compliance was met 99.6% and 98.3% of the time for Zone A and B station groups, respectively (Table 2-2). Overall compliance was met 98.9% of the time for all stations combined. This represents a slight decrease in compliance of 0.6% from the 2014-15 monitoring year (Figure 2-4). The DO values (Table B-6) were well within the range of long-term monitoring results (OCSD 1996b, 2004). Thus, it was determined that there were no environmentally significant effects to DO from the wastewater discharge. Acidity (pH) Compliance was met 99.6%and 99.8%of the time for Zone A and B station groups, respectively(Table 2-2). Overall compliance was met 99.7%of the time for all stations combined, a 0.1%decrease from the previous year's value and were within the annual ranges since 1985 (Figure 2-4). There were no environmentally significant effects to pH from the wastewater discharge as the measured values (Table B-6) were within the range to which marine organisms are naturally exposed. Nutrients (Ammonium) During 2015-16, 85% (n=1,655) of the samples were below the MDL (<0.02 mg/L). Detectable ammonium concentrations (n=256) ranged from 0.02 to 0.17 mg/L, with over 75% of the detected values found below 15 m (Table B-6). Plume-related changes in ammonium were not considered 2-4 Compliance Determinations �az ant T18 � -.._...... �8 3 T2< T19 T1 M T10 • ai eom T23_ 'Z `f i T22 T10 ____ nme m��t -- Rlg-fisning Zo • 'Annual$boons(n-0) am • ..'o MSD M.M N17 nonlsbeonib�l - Figure 2-3 Trawl monitoring stations, as well as rig-fishing locations, for 2015-16. environmentally significant as maximum values were over 20 times less than the chronic (4 mg/L) and more than 35 times less than the acute (6 mg/L)toxicity standards of the COP (SWRCB 2012). In addition, there were no detectable plankton-associated impacts (i.e., excessive plankton blooms caused by the discharge). Organics in the Water Column Only 8 constituents from Table B of the COP have effluent limitations established in the District's NPDES permit. During the period from July 2015 through June 2016, none of these constituents exceeded the effluent limitations established in the permit. Radioactivity The District measures the effluent for radioactivity but not the receiving waters. The results of the effluent analyses during 2015-16 indicated that both state and federal standards were consistently met, and are published in the District's Discharge Monitoring Reports. As fish and invertebrate communities are diverse and healthy, compliance is considered to be met. Overall Results Overall, results from the District's 2015-16 water quality monitoring program detected minor changes in measured water quality parameters related to the discharge of wastewater to the coastal ocean. 2-5 Compliance Determinations mo 95 U A E90 e 85 I I O so o s 0 100 es u A o� 90 U E as e `m Ll LI rIIIII rlIIII rIIIII rIIIII r�l r�IIII rlIIII rIIIII r�IIII rIIIII s�� � II II IIII II III III II II IIIIII III II III I I 100 95 U R_ E 99 85 e F BO Y' 9•^�'^�9" 4' � ^Y' ������5�n ti F M1v 'l C` ti T� �'1�0'�^''V ti'L Mh^a'�y Year Figure 2-4 Summary of mean percent compliance for dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, and light transmissivity (%T) for all compliance stations compared to reference stations, 1985- 2016. 2-6 Compliance Determinations This is consistent with previously reported results (e.g., OCSD 2016). Plume-related changes in temperature, salinity, DO, pH, and transmissivity were measurable beyond the initial mixing zone during some surveys. This usually extended only into the nearfield stations, typically <2 km away from the outfall, similar to what has been seen in the past. None of these changes were determined to be environmentally significant since they fell within natural ranges to which marine organisms are exposed (OCSD 1996a, 2004; Wilber and Clarke 2001, Chavez at al. 2002, Jarvis at al. 2004,Allen at al. 2005, Hsieh at al. 2005). Overall,the public health risks and measured environmental effects to the receiving water continue to be small. All values were within the ranges of natural variability for the study area, and reflected seasonal and yearly changes of large-scale regional influences. The limited observable plume effects occurred primarily at depth, even during the winter when stratification was weakest. In summary, OMP staff concluded that the discharge, in 2015-16, did not greatly affect the receiving water environment, and that beneficial uses were protected and maintained. SEDIMENT GEOCHEMISTRY Consistent with previous years (OCSD 2014, 2016), mean concentrations of organic contaminants and metals tended to increase with increasing depth, with the highest in depositional areas (Tables 2-3 to 2-6). Sediment geochemistry values were also below levels of biological concern (Effects Range-Median (ERM)values) (Long at al. 1995). Most means of sediment geochemistry parameter values in 2015-16 were comparable between within-ZID and non-ZID station groups and were either similar to or well below regional values. The elevated mean sulfide value (9.81 mg/kg) for the non- ZID station group in Summer 2015 was driven by the 198 mg/kg value at Newport Canyon Station C2 and was not representative of the Middle Shelf Zone 2 stations. When Station C2 was removed as an outlier, the mean at the non-ZID group (3.09 pg/kg)was similar to that of the within-ZID group (3.64 pg/kg). The elevated mean copper (Cu) value (37.39 mg/kg) for the within-ZID group in Summer 2015 was driven by the 119 mg/kg value at Station 0. This is not cause for concern, as the Cu concentration at Station 0 was below the ERM in Summer 2015 and was measured at 11.50 mg/kg in Winter 2016. These results, coupled with the absence of sediment toxicity in amphipod survival tests (Table 2-7)and the presence of healthy fish and invertebrate communities both near and away from the outfall (see below), suggest good sediment quality in the monitoring area. Therefore, we conclude that compliance was met. BIOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES Infaunal Communities Atotal of 592 invertebrate taxa comprising 21,613 individuals were collected in the 2015-16 monitoring year. As with previous years(OCSD 2013,2014),there were noticeable declines in the mean species number (richness) and mean abundance of infauna at stations deeper than 120 m (Table 2-8) and the Annellida (segmented worms)was the dominant taxonomic group at all depth strata (Table 3-7). Mean community measure values were comparable between within-and non-ZID stations, and most station values were within regional and District historical ranges in both surveys (Tables 2-8 and 2-9). The infaunal community at all within-ZID and non-ZID stations in both surveys can be classified as reference condition based on their low (<25) Benthic Response Index (BRI) values and/or high (>60) Infaunal Trophic Index (ITI) values. The community composition at all within-ZID stations, except for Station 4 in winter, was similar to that of non-ZID stations based on multivariate analyses of the infaunal species and abundances (Figure 2-5). The absence of the polychaetes Chaetozone columbiana, Aricidea (Acmira) catherinae, and Magelona hartmanae, among others, contributed to the infaunal community dissimilarity at Station 4 in winter. Nevertheless, the infaunal community at this station can be classified as reference condition based on the low BRI and high ITI values (Table 2-9). In addition, there was no pollution-tolerant polychaete species Capitella capitata Cmplx 2-7 Compliance Determinations Table 2-3 Physical properties and organic contaminant concentrations of sediment samples collected at each semi-annual and annual (') station in Summer 2015 compared to Effects Range-Median(ERM)values and regional measurements. ZID=Zone of Initial Dilution,AWM =Area Weighted Mean, ND = Not Detected, NIA= Not Applicable. Station Depth Me Ilan Fine TOC SulBd. TotM P Total N rPAH EDDT rPeat rPCO (m) Phi (%) (%) (mglkg) (mglkg) (mglkg) (mglkg) Imgeng) (mg&g) (mg)kg) Middle Shell Zone 1(3130 m) 7 41 3.81 35.6 0.42 1.90 1100 400 76.3 NO NO 044 8' 46 3.8fi 38.3 OA4 4.32 1000 360 50.2 ND ND 0.79 21' 44 3.74 31.4 0.40 1.85 1100 330 52.3 ND ND 0.15 22" 45 3.85 3].] 0.40 3.55 110a 380 89.0 ND ND 0.3B 30' 46 3.62 26.] 0.2] 4.28 1100 390 62.1 ND ND ND 36' 45 3.84 38.8 0.28 1.]3 980 390 65.] NO NO ND 55" 60 2.0 6.4 0.1] 1.52 fi80 1910 21.6 NO ND 0.19 59' 40 3.31 18.4 0.22 1.40 1000 300 34.4 2.19 ND 3.85 Mean 3.61 29.2 0.32 2.57 1008 340 SBA 0.27 ND 0.72 Middle Shelf Zone 2,Wllhln-ZID(51-90 m) 0 56 3.34 9.7 0.39 1.54 1400 440 62.3 2.14 ND 9.66 4 % 3.41 16.0 0.30 1.68 910 350 66S ND ND 0.71 76 50 3." 1].2 0.32 4.36 920 330 464 ND ND 2.76 ZB 56 340 14.5 0.28 6.97 1000 390 38.1 ND ND 269 Mean 3.40 14.3 0.32 3.84 ion 378 63.3 0.54 NO 3.98 Middle Shelf Zone 2 Non-ZID(51-90 m) 1 S6 3.54 1].] 0.28 1.72 1100 360 129.8 1.89 ND TW 3 60 3.49 16.2 0.39 1.62 1000 310 32.9 ND ND 2.70 5 59 3.78 32.7 0.26 1.65 1000 310 30A ND ND 1.73 9 59 3.34 15.4 0.23 3.04 850 260 61.0 ND ND ND to- 62 3.85 36.9 0A0 1.73 990 370 76.2 ND ND 1.39 12 58 3.32 15.9 0.27 5.21 830 290 30.3 ND ND ND 13" 59 3.85 39.3 0.39 1.95 900 380 74A 1.82 ND 4.26 37' 56 2.79 12.4 0.23 5.67 560 360 40.5 ND ND ND 68 52 3.71 28.0 0.27 2.37 940 360 33A ND ND 4.00 69 52 3.59 22.1 0.23 1.33 910 380 78.3 ND ND 0." 70 52 3.48 18.] 0.25 2.74 1000 350 39A ND ND 0.79 71 52 3." 1T.1 0.2] 4.12 "a 340 1010 ND ND 0.419 72 55 3.60 20.6 0.26 3.37 1100 360 52.8 1.88 ND 2.14 73 55 3.43 13.7 0.34 3.96 2000 400 83.3 ND ND ].8] 74 57 3.39 14.1 0.27 4.16 900 330 41A ND ND 0.43 75 60 3.40 13.9 0.21 2.42 970 250 22A ND ND 0.17 ]] 60 3.26 12.8 0.24 3.78 860 350 1].2 ND ND 0.41 78 63 3.43 15.6 0.37 4.76 920 300 28.0 ND ND 1.41 79 65 3.59 20.1 0.26 2.79 900 310 79.2 ND ND 0.17 80 65 3.83 40.4 0.28 1.94 1000 320 25A ND ND 1.52 01 65 3.46 16.7 0.24 2.04 870 310 20.2 ND ND ND 82 65 3.41 15.3 0.25 2.28 920 300 24.3 ND ND 0.17 B4 54 3.43 14.0 0.27 2.90 1100 400 157.1 ND ND 6.05 85 57 3.38 lid 0.43 2.52 1400 410 2685 ND ND 9.36 86 57 3.48 16.5 0.34 5.19 1000 340 873 ND ND 6.26 07 0 3.46 17.6 0.26 4.]] 950 290 21.9 ND ND 0.53 C 56 3.51 22.6 0.27 4.57 940 340 25.5 2.14 ND 0.44 C2' % 4.89 87.0 1.29 198.00 970 1100 3069 7.09 ND 5.51 CON 59 3.54 21.9 0.28 186 1000 310 20A 1.94 ND ND Mean 3.54 22.3 0.32 9.81 994 362 59.6 0.58 ND 2.25 Middle Shelf Zone 3(91-120 m) 17' 91 3.0 20.5 0.43 6.43 830 360 4L7 ND ND 0.16 to- 91 3.68 25.6 0.37 2.00 840 360 163 ND ND 0.20 20' 100 3.99 49.1 0.55 3.38 980 520 85.1 2.14 ND 2.67 23' iW 3.33 16.7 0.37 9.91 820 330 95.5 0.74 ND 7.14 29" 100 4.23 60.6 0.62 5.15 1000 570 BE6 1.84 ND 0.19 33' 100 3.54 29.7 0.36 12.40 820 480 55.9 ND ND ND 38' 100 403 510 0A7 692 1000 580 852 2,16 ND ND 56' 100 4.04 51.4 0.47 5.22 1000 540 71.0 4.88 ND 2.94 60' 100 4.01 504 0" 129 1000 510 1217 3,67 ND 270 83" im 3.74 29.4 0.41 5A6 870 480 79.6 19.17 ND 0.39 Mean 3.90 38.4 0.45 6.42 916 473 74.5 3,46 ND 1.65 Onfer Shelf(121-200 m) I4 200 4.55 76.2 1.01 5.46 1000 890 1588 12.66 ND 0.80 25' 200 4.72 ]].2 1.26 17.W 970 11W 44.6 6.22 ND 2.85 27' 200 4.09 10.2 0.71 4S(i 1000 670 63.9 3.46 ND 0.17 39' 200 3.66 32.1 0.41 3.01 930 540 56.1 2.22 ND ND 57' 20D 5.59 88.1 1.59 13.90 1000 1400 2200 22.11 ND 11.33 61" 200 4.72 73.8 0.97 10.60 1000 910 125A 7.86 ND 6.16 63' 200 4.72 ]].9 0.88 16.30 1000 950 1068 6.70 ND 4.06 65' 2m 4.41 61.6 0.80 8.54 1000 860 137.9 3.20 NO 1.36 U. 187 5.60 85.0 1.71 82.00 980 1300 251.1 5.09 ND 3.03 Mean 4.61F 0.5 1.04 18.01 980T 958 129A 7.72 NO 3.31 2-8 Table 2-3 continues. Compliance Determinations Table 2-3 continued. Stafion Depth Median Fine. TOC Sulfide. Total Total £PAN £DDT £Peat £PCB (m) Phi (%l 1%) Ungecg) (mglkg) (mg)kg) (mglkg) (mglkg) hngagl (m91k9) Upper Slope/Canon(201-500 m) 40' 303 4.74 78A 1.17 13.20 1100 1200 93.3 3.81 NO 0.57 41' 303 4.70 73.5 1.13 13.90 1000 1100 87.5 6.72 13.3 1.41 1 303 4A5 78.1 1.38 15.40 %a 1" 172.8 7.82 1.67 220 1 241 6.09 lips 2.06 15.50 1100 1900 178.8 13.07 1.00 920 1 300 5.96 90.8 2.01 18.60 910 17M 325.6 24.24 NO 5.79 1 300 5.97 88.3 1.97 21.30 850 1800 219.8 11.34 NO 8.59 1 300 5s0 86.2 1,57 13.70 1000 940 1318 2,W NO 0,15 C5• 296 6AI 81.9 2.37 88.20 "a 1" 228.8 4.97 ND 2D7 Mean 5.53 "A 1.71 2A.98 no 1460 179.8 9.36 2 3.75 Sediment quality guidelines and regional aummer values ERM N/A N/A NIA NIA NIA NIA 44,792.0 46.10 WA 180.00 &9M93AWM MMIe Shoff N/A 40.0 0.70 NIA NIA NIA 0.0 18.00 WA 230 eigWl3AWM amerfiheif N/A 49.0 0.93 NIA NIA NIA 92.0 79.00 WA 4.50 619h1Y13AWM Upper Slope N/A 15A 1.90 NIA NIA NIA 16,10 490.DO WA 15.00 Table 2-4 Metal concentrations (mg/kg) in sediment samples collected at each semi-annual and annual (*) station in Summer 2015 compared to Effects Range-Median (ERM) values and regional measurements. ZID = Zone of Initial Dilution, AWM = Area Weighted Mean, ND = Not Detected, NA= Not Applicable. station Depth Sit Ae Be Be Ca Cr Cu P6 Ng Ni S. Ag Zn Manche Shell Zone 1(31-50 m) 7' 41 ND 2.21 37s 0.21 0.21 19,90 9.86 6,59 0.02 9.8 ND 0.12 37.3 8' 44 ND 2.44 48.1 0.21 0.23 19,20 9.56 5.76 0.02 9.7 0.22 0.11 37.2 21' 44 ND 2.43 31.5 0.20 0.19 20,60 9.91 6,23 0.01 10.0 0d9 0.11 37.6 22' 45 ND 2.56 414 0.23 0.25 20.80 10.10 6.31 0.02 10.9 0.17 0.10 40.6 1 46 ND 1.94 33.7 0.20 0.18 18.90 8.30 5.80 0.01 8] ND 0.10 33.5 1 45 ND 2.43 394 0.22 0.23 18,60 8.63 6,32 0.01 10.2 ND 0.06 37.8 1 40 ND 1.43 24.0 0.14 0.09 12,90 4,52 346 0,01 s2 ND 0.04 22.7 1 40 ND 1.86 31.3 0.17 0.16 16.40 6.62 4.54 0.01 7.8 ND 0.07 28.6 Mean ND 2.16 36.6 0.20 0.19 18.41 844 5.63 0.01 9.2 0.07 0.09 34.4 Mitltlle SOeIIZone 2,Within-ZID(51-90 m) 0 56 ND 3,69 303 0,25 044 28,60 119.00 6,35 0.04 102 0.39 0.21 493 4 56 ND 2.52 28.9 0.23 0.22 20.10 9.07 4.72 0.01 9.0 0.33 0.13 40.8 16 58 ND 2.23 33.8 0.28 0.28 21.60 10.70 4.63 0.02 10.0 0.39 0.16 464 ZB 56 ND 2.83 31.3 0.28 0.38 22.50 10A0 4,83 0,02 100 0.40 OAS 462 Mean NO 2.82 32.7 0.26 0.33 23.20 37.39 5.13 0.02 9.8 0.38 0.16 45.7 Middle SOeffZone 2,Non-ZID(5150 m) 1 56 ND 2.51 363 0.26 0.38 23,90 12.30 5,97 0,02 9.3 0.35 0.23 43.6 3 60 ND 2.63 34A 0.29 0.26 23,60 11.20 5,19 0,06 100 0.35 0.16 46.6 5 59 ND 2,85 41.3 0,28 0,24 23,50 11.80 6,02 0,02 109 0.36 O.17 458 9 59 ND 2.59 31.5 0.26 0.19 21.60 8.82 4.83 0.01 9.5 0.37 0.11 39.2 10' 62 ND 3,32 38s 0,27 0,23 30,80 11.60 6,17 0.02 108 0.41 0.17 4`1D 12 58 ND 2.56 30.9 0.28 0.21 20,70 8.47 4,82 0.01 as 041 0.10 39.8 13' 59 ND 2.06 434 0.21 0.24 21,30 1030 5.54 0.01 101 0.20 0.15 40.4 31' 56 ND 1.15 29.2 0.19 0.22 14.80 6.81 4.50 0.01 8.5 ND 0.05 33.3 fib 52 ND 2.11 38.0 0.25 0.27 22.60 11.10 5.74 0.02 10.0 0.34 0.18 43.1 69 52 ND 3.17 34.8 0.26 0.26 23,50 10.20 5,55 0,02 10A 0.34 0.14 43.0 10 52 ND 3.21 39.6 0.26 0.28 2140 1040 5,31 0.02 As 0.38 0.17 43.3 71 52 ND 2.96 35.7 0.26 0.31 21.20 9.48 5.12 0.02 9.7 0.32 0.13 41.9 12 55 ND 2.83 36.5 0.27 0.27 23.50 11.30 5.61 0.02 9.9 0.35 0.20 43.7 73 55 ND 3.29 34.1 0.27 0.51 23,90 45sO 7,43 0.11 9A 0.38 0.30 48.0 74 57 ND 2.81 31A 0.24 0.33 19,90 9.15 4,61 am 9.1 0.31 0.11 42.2 75 60 ND 2.69 30.9 0.26 0.31 19.40 8.05 4.23 0.01 8] 0.31 0.10 41.3 TT 60 ND 2.58 29.7 0.25 0.20 20.30 8.23 4.47 0.01 8.6 0.39 0.11 37.7 18 63 ND 2,30 31.3 0,28 0,19 22,10 9.20 4,78 0,06 as 0.38 OAS 31.2 79 65 ND 2.82 35.2 0.28 0.18 22.10 10.30 5,06 0.02 103 0.39 0.14 45.4 80 65 ND 3.48 424 0.35 0.21 22.60 12.30 5,67 0.02 121 0.41 0.10 53.2 81 65 ND 2.46 37.5 0.30 0.19 20.50 8.94 4.70 0.02 9.6 0.33 0.11 42.0 82 65 ND 2.23 33.6 0.27 0.19 21.80 8.86 4.50 0.01 9.9 0.40 0.10 42.7 84 54 0.1 3.36 32.0 0.24 0.32 22,40 12.60 5,80 0.02 ad 0.31 0.47 P1.7 85 51 ND 2.83 26.9 0.N 0.48 22.90 12.70 5,37 0.02 94 du 0.23 43.2 86 51 ND 2.47 34.1 0.24 0." 24.50 13.00 5.66 0.03 10.0 0.35 0.23 46.9 87 60 ND 2.08 31.6 0.27 0.22 22.10 10.10 4.53 0.01 9.6 0.39 0.13 45.7 C 56 ND 3.05 "A 0.27 0.23 21,90 9.98 6.34 0,02 10fi 0.39 0.12 46.4 12' 56 0.1 4.15 99] 0.41 0.45 32,60 2Z00 12AO 0,03 212 OAS OAS 92.0 CON 59 0.1 2.62 48.0 0.27 0.19 23.70 10.20 6.09 0.02 11.1 0.36 0.11 43.9 Mean 0.01 2.72 37.7 022 0.28 2259 11.91 5.59 0.02 10.3 0.35 0.16 44.8 Table 2-4 continues. 2-9 Compliance Determinations Table 2-4 continued. SlMlpn Depth Sb Ae Be Be Od Cr Cu Pb Hg Ni Se A9 Zn Middle Shelf Zone 3(91-120 m) 17' 91 ND 1.75 34.7 0.26 0.18 20.10 6.97 4.71 0.01 11.0 0.20 0.08 43.0 18" 91 ND 1.55 37.1 0.25 0.19 20.W 8.89 4.94 0.01 11.0 ND 0.08 42.5 20" 1W ND 2.49 48.0 0.25 0.26 24.W 13.60 6.55 0.02 12.6 0.20 0.16 47.5 23' 100 ND 2.05 31.6 0.23 0.18 17.70 7.54 4.38 0.01 9.8 0.17 0.06 37.5 29' 1W ND 2.18 52.2 0.26 0.28 25.10 15.W 7.31 0.02 13.9 0.25 0.17 51.3 33' 1W ND 2.10 47.6 0.24 0.31 20.70 9.68 5.02 0.01 12.2 0.29 0.09 46.1 38" 1W 0.1 2W 57.1 0.27 0.42 22W 1140 808 002 13.1 0.31 0,11 48.6 56" 1W 0.1 2.80 70.5 am am 34.W 14.70 7.38 0.03 14.0 0.62 0.20 54.2 60' 1 W 0.1 1.99 54.9 0.26 0.29 25.0 14.20 7.0 0.02 13.4 0.24 0.18 49.8 83' 1W ND 2.W 420 0.25 0.19 22.00 1060 5W 001 12.0 0.19 0.10 46.1 Mean 0.03 2.19 47.6 0.26 0.26 23.31 11.0 5.03 0.02 12.3 0.25 0.12 46.7 Outer Shell(121-200 m) 24" 2W 0.1 2.99 816 0.41 0.42 36SO 1820 8.53 004 17.3 0.20 0.19 61.7 25' 2W 0.1 3.34 99.1 0.41 0.51 40.W 20.50 9.62 0.03 18.2 0.94 0.25 66.4 27' 2W ND 1.88 58.8 0.29 0.33 26.90 13.10 6.41 0.02 14.9 0.31 0.10 W.2 39' 2W ND 2.28 46.4 0.27 0.26 23.10 10.W 5.35 0.01 13.0 0.28 0.08 45.3 57' 200 0.2 4.91 154.0 0.50 0.74 50.10 37.0 16.00 0.03 24.6 1.19 0.62 87.7 61, 200 0.1 3.12 105.0 0.34 0.60 35 W 25.20 10.5() 0.04 20.0 0.52 0.35 69.5 63" 200 0.1 3.26 151.0 0.40 a." 40.W 20.10 9.31 0.02 18.1 0.89 0.25 64.3 65' 2W 0.1 3.38 74.7 0.36 0.59 28.70 16.90 7.40 0.02 17.3 0.52 0.15 62.5 C4" 187 02 605 1020 052 063 45SO 25W 1240 003 235 1US a22 90.6 Mean 0.1 3.47 97.0 0.19 0.0 36.47 20.80 9.0 0.03 18.5 0.66 0.25 66.5 upper Slppe7Cenynn(2013 0m) 40' 303 0.1 2.40 92.0 0.37 0.48 37.10 21.W 8.91 0.02 20.5 0.62 0.16 86.3 41' W3 0.2 3.W 94.4 0.45 0.45 39.40 21.20 9.31 0.02 19.8 0.99 0.19 68.5 42 W3 0.2 4.70 119.0 0.51 ON 52.40 25.30 11.30 0.02 22.1 1.30 0.27 76.6 1 241 0.2 3.69 154.0 0.48 0.79 55.W 38.W 13.70 0.06 27.6 IAA 0.49 90.1 58' 3W 0.3 5.76 177.0 0.59 0.69 56.W 34.40 16.00 0.02 27.5 1.68 0.43 85.1 62' 3W 0.2 533 172.0 OW 092 59W 43SO 18.10 005 286 0.95 065 951 1 3W 0.1 4.85 104.0 0.49 0.48 39.90 28.40 11.20 0.02 26.2 0.70 0.18 76.7 C5' 2% 02 588 11SO O58 ON 57.10 32M 144W 003 264 164 0.35 939 Mean 0.2 4.55 128.9 O.W 0.65 49.76 30.61 12.89 0.03 24.0 1.12 0.34 81.7 Sediment 0valdy9pidelines ar dregional summer values ERM NIA 7000 NIA NIA 9.60 370.W 270W 21800 070 516 NIA 370 410.0 BI9M93 AM MI4dle SNIT 0.9 2.70 130.0 0.21 0.68 30.W 7.90 7.W 0.05 15.0 0.10 0.29 48.0 EgM13 AM Outer Snell 1.1 &W 130.0 0.36 On 37.00 11,00 10.00 0.07 18.0 0.21 0.39 57.0 Bghf13 AM Upper Slope 1.4 5.40 160.0 0.27 1.50 57.00 21.00 12W 0US 50.0 089 0.24 NU and a total of 27 individuals of the pollution-sensitive amphipod genera Ampelisca and Rhepoxynius at Station 4 in winter. These multiple lines of evidence suggest that the outfall discharge had an overall negligible effect on the benthic community structure within the monitoring area. We conclude, therefore, that the biota was not degraded by the outfall discharge, and as such, compliance was met. Epibenthic Macroinvertebrate Communities A total of 54 epibenthic macroinvertebrate (EMI) species, comprising 8,442 individuals and a total weight of 30.3 kg, was collected from the monitoring area during trawls conducted in the 2015-16 period (Tables B-8 and B-9). Ophiura luetkenii(brittlestar)and Strongytocentrotus fragilis(sea urchin) were the most dominant species in terms of abundance(n=6,496;77%of total)and biomass(12.3 kg; 41% of total), respectively. All mean community measure values for EMIs, except for abundance, at the Middle Shelf Zone 2, outfall stratum were comparable to those at the Middle Shelf Zone 2, non- outfall stratum in both surveys (Table 2-10). Large catches (>1,500)of O. luetkenii at Station T11 in summer and winter contributed to the higher mean abundance values at the Middle Shelf Zone 2, non- outfall stratum(Table B-8). Historically, interannual abundance of EMIs is highly variable and typically reflect changes in several dominant species such as O. luetkenii(OCSD 2014). Multivariate analyses (cluster and non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS)) of the EMI species and abundance data revealed that the EMI community composition was similar between Middle Shelf Zone 2, outfall and non-outfall stations in both surveys (Figure 2-6). This suggests that the outfall discharge had an overall negligible effect on the EMI community structure within the monitoring area. Based on these 2-10 Compliance Determinations Table 2-5 Physical properties and organic contaminant concentrations of sediment samples collected at each semi-annual station in Winter 2016 compared to Effects Range- Median (ERM)values and regional measurements. ZID=Zone of Initial Dilution,AWM =Area Weighted Mean, ND = Not Detected, N/A= Not Applicable. anal Depth(in) Mail Fins TOC Bul68es TOUT P Tofal N £PAN £DOT £Peat £PCB Phi (%) (%) legs ) (m91k9) Im91k91 (m91k9) (m91k9) (melk9) (m91k9) Mange Shell Zone 2,4Yrthin-ZID(51-90 n,) 0 56 3.36 11.8 0.36 2.30 1200 550 146.6 2.26 ND 13.63 4 56 3.37 136 0.26 2.45 850 350 55.5 ND ND 0.39 76 58 3.42 16.4 0.26 5.50 960 310 24.8 ND ND 1.01 ZB 56 3.44 17.6 0.29 7.41 860 no 52.3 ND ND 0.57 Mean 3.40 14.9 on 4.42 968 375 69.8 0.57 NO 3.90 Middle ShellZorre 2,Non-ZID(51-90 ad 1 56 3.57 21.1 0.30 ND 1100 430 51.7 2.16 NO 5.35 3 60 3.51 16.0 0.31 1.89 970 390 21.2 1.80 NO 3.08 5 59 3.7 30.9 0.33 3.87 930 no 30.9 2.35 ND 1.70 9 59 3.37 13.4 0.29 3.25 820 no 38.7 ND ND 0.16 12 58 3.32 14.2 0.30 5.59 120 570 149.1 ND ND ND fib 52 3.69 26.0 0.30 4.17 930 340 47.1 3.27 ND 1.15 89 52 3.66 28.4 0.32 5.34 1000 340 48.6 2.15 ND 2.35 70 52 3.55 23.3 0.32 4.47 990 430 72.6 2.07 ND 3.81 71 52 3.40 14.A 0.28 4.32 1000 370 34.6 1.79 ND 0.38 72 55 3.57 19.8 0.29 4.31 950 430 48.8 2.13 NO 2.12 73 55 3.37 12.9 0.37 9.11 1100 340 197.0 2.42 ND 6.51 74 57 3.42 15.8 0.27 8.60 990 no 58.5 2.19 ND 1.36 75 60 an 138 0,30 559 860 370 29S NO ND 0A0 77 fie 3.37 14.0 0.24 2.39 890 370 24.0 ND NO 0.16 78 63 3.42 14.5 0.25 5.08 900 340 31.6 NO ND 0.35 79 65 3.55 19.6 0.30 5.54 No 390 51.7 1]8 ND 2.76 80 65 3.60 24.7 0.27 4.90 940 ND 22.5 ND ND NO 81 85 3.47 17.3 0.29 4.71 870 2B0 24.5 NO ND ND 82 65 3.37 14.7 0.28 4.40 880 370 19.0 ND ND NO 84 54 3.44 14.A 0.34 7.68 990 400 58.1 2,10 ND 6.58 85 57 3.35 92 0.39 21.10 1300 540 295.3 2.69 ND 13.73 86 57 3.50 22.1 0.35 9.61 1000 490 90.4 1.92 NO 13.34 87 60 3.40 14.A 0.26 8.42 960 330 24.0 NO NO 1.19 C 56 3.44 19.0 0.31 5.10 950 no 25.0 2.16 ND 1]1 CON 59 3.58 217 0.36 9.01 950 410 36.5 2.76 ND am Mean 3.48 18.1 0.30 5.98 961 390 61.2 1,43 ND 2.75 Seill quality guitlelines and regional summer values ERM NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA 44,792.0 46A0 NIA 180.00 Bight 13 AWM Middle Shelf NIA 48.0 070 NIA NIA NIA 550 18.00 NIA 2.70 overall results, we conclude that the EMI communities within the monitoring area were not degraded by the outfall discharge, and consequently, compliance was met. Fish Communities Atotal of 33 fish taxa, comprising 5,636 individuals and a total weight of 211.7 kg, were collected from the monitoring area during the 2015-16 trawling effort (Tables B-10 and B-11). The mean species richness, abundance, biomass, H', and SDI values of demersal fishes were comparable between outfall and non-ouffall stations in both surveys, with values falling within historical ranges (Table 2-11). More importantly, the fish communities at outfall and non-outfall stations were classified as reference condition based on their low(<45) mean fish response index (FRI)values in both surveys. Multivariate analyses (cluster and nli of the demersal fish species and abundance data further demonstrated that the fish communities were similar between the ouffall and non-ouffall stations (Figure 2-7). These results indicate that the ouffall discharge had no adverse effect on the demersal fish community structure within the monitoring area. We conclude that the demersal fish communities within the monitoring area were not degraded by the outfall discharge, and thus,compliance was met. 2-11 Compliance Determinations Table 2-6 Metal concentrations (mg/kg) in sediment samples collected at each semi-annual station in Winter 2016 compared to Effects Range-Median (ERM)values and regional measurements. ZID =Zone of Initial Dilution,AWM =Area Weighted Mean, ND = Not Detected, NA= Not Applicable. SUitlon Depth(m) Sb Ae Be Be C0 Cr Cp Pb H9 NI U A9 Zn Middle Shelf Zone 2,Wllhln-ZID(51-90 hn 0 58 0.1 3.08 29.3 0.21 0.43 21.50 11.50 5.11 0.03 8.7 0.33 0.17 43.5 4 58 ND 2.41 27.0 0.21 0.19 18.40 7.84 4.44 0.02 8.0 0.27 0.08 37.0 76 58 ND 2.07 33.0 0.26 0.26 19.00 10.10 4.03 0.02 9.3 0.31 0.12 42.5 ZB 56 ND 2.80 33.5 0.22 026 20.90 9.57 4.66 0.02 9.8 0.29 0.10 43.0 Mean 0.02 2.0 30.7 0.22 0.28 19.95 9.76 4.56 0.02 9.0 0.30 0.12 41.5 MI die Shell Zone 2 Non-ZID(51-90 m) 1 56 ND 2.60 33.2 0.22 0.30 21.30 11.30 5.16 0.03 11.0 0.34 0.19 42.1 3 60 ND 2.15 34.6 0.23 0.27 21.90 10.60 4.79 0.02 9.7 0.32 0.16 46.4 5 59 ND 274 39.7 0.23 0.24 21.90 10.40 5.26 0.02 10.2 0.34 0.14 42.6 9 59 ND 2.11 31.8 0.22 0.23 18.90 8.18 4.95 0.02 8.4 0.31 0A0 38.2 12 58 ND 2.34 28.5 0.21 0.18 26.10 7.34 4.41 0.01 8.2 0.30 0.09 35.6 68 52 0.1 2.98 38.1 0.23 0.26 21.30 10.70 5.52 0.02 9.9 0.34 0.17 43.8 69 52 0.1 IN 36.8 0.23 0.30 21.20 10.50 5.25 0.02 9.8 0.34 0.15 43.0 70 52 ND 2.29 31.3 0.22 0.30 19.20 9.44 4.80 0.03 8.7 0.30 0.14 38.6 71 52 ND 2.39 29.8 0.21 0.26 18.00 7.92 4.36 0.02 8.1 0.31 0.10 36.5 72 55 ND 1.98 34.5 0.22 0.27 20.50 10.40 4.80 0.02 9.0 0.29 0.18 41.0 73 55 0.1 3,21 29.2 0,21 0.36 20.30 11.90 5.19 0.03 8,6 0.30 0.15 40.5 74 57 NO 2.42 31.2 0.23 0.31 19.50 8.70 4.59 0.02 8.6 0.30 0.12 39.7 75 60 ND 2.41 32.6 0.23 0.36 20.20 8.70 4.01 0.03 9.0 0.30 0.12 39.9 77 60 ND 2.32 31.5 0.23 0.21 20.80 8.59 4.44 0.01 8.6 0.31 0.10 40.0 78 63 0.1 2.21 29.3 0.23 0.21 19.80 8.00 3.92 0.01 8.3 0.33 0.09 38.7 79 65 ND 2.07 W.3 0.26 0.23 20.60 9.84 4.74 0.02 9.9 0.32 0.12 44.5 80 65 NO 2.57 UA 0.28 0.16 19.90 10.10 4.88 0.01 10.0 0.28 0.08 45.5 81 65 ND 2.01 34.7 0.25 0.18 19.20 8.40 4.14 0.02 9.1 0.31 0.11 38.4 82 85 ND 2.11 29.0 0.22 0.16 18.60 7.44 1% 0.01 8.4 0.28 0.08 359 84 54 ND 3.07 35.3 0.21 0.32 22.40 11.90 5.73 0.03 8.9 0.35 0.31 42.1 85 57 0.1 3.17 30.8 0.22 0.55 22.60 12.50 7.18 0.05 8.7 0.38 0.30 44.8 88 57 0.1 2.19 30.8 0.23 0.38 20.50 14.30 5.03 0.02 9.0 0.36 0.18 440 87 60 ND 2.18 29.1 0.23 0.20 20.00 9.00 4.20 0.02 8.8 0.29 0.94 40.4 C 56 0.1 2.59 44.0 0.22 0.18 20.90 8.86 5.26 0.02 10.0 0.31 0.09 41.2 CON 59 0.1 2.23 45.9 0.22 0.18 21.70 9.01 5.11 0.02 10.2 0.32 0.09 39.9 Mean 0.04 2.46 33.6 0.23 0.26 20.69 9.76 4.87 0.02 2.2 0.32 0.17 10.9 Sediment qual0y guitlelines add regional summer values ERM N/A 70.00 NIA WA 9.60 370.00 270.00 218.00 0.70 51.6 NIA 3.70 410.0 619M13AWMMleelelnelt 0.9 2.70 130.0 0.21 O.6B 30.00 7.90 7.00 0.05 15.0 0.10 0.29 48.0 Table 2-7 Whole-sediment Eohaustorius estuarius (amphipod) toxicity test results for 2015-16. The home sediment represents the control; N/A= Not Applicable. sb5on %Survival %of home peelue Aninesmem home 100 N/A NIA NIA 0 94 94 0.01 Nonbxic 1 99 99 0.17 Nomnxic 4 98 98 0.07 NoMoxlc 72 99 99 0.17 Nonbxic 73 100 100 0.50 Nonbxic 76 97 97 0.08 Nomexlc 77 98 98 0.07 Nomaxic CON 99 99 0.17 Nornexic ZB 100 100 0.50 Nontoxic ZB Cup 98 98 0.07 Nomoxic FISH BIOACCUMULATION AND HEALTH Demersal Fish Tissue Chemistry Muscle tissue contaminant concentrations in Hornyhead Turbot were generally similar between outfall and non-outfall stations (Table 2-12). In English Sole, the EDDT mean for muscle was higher for the outfall sample compared to the non-outfall sample. However, this mean value falls within historical ranges within the monitoring area (OCSD 2014). 2-12 Compliance Determinations Table 2-8 Summary of infaunal community measure values for each semi-annual and annual (*) station sampled during the Summer 2015 benthic survey, including regional and Districal historical values. ZID = Zone of Initial Dilution; N/A= Not Applicable; NC = Not Calculated. Station Depth(m) utal N*. Abundance ce IF SDI ITI am MMtlle Shultz.1(31-50 m) ]' 41 t02 476 3.42 22 94 13 8' 44 109 337 4.01 43 91 15 21' 44 98 286 4.06 40 91 8 22` 45 87 269 3.93 34 98 13 30' 46 98 340 4.15 40 88 14 38' 45 63 168 3.61 25 97 11 55` 40 83 203 3.95 31 84 14 59 40 ]] 219 3.85 32 91 14 Mean 98 297 3.87 33 92 13 Middle ShellZ.Z,Mfln-ZID(51-90 m) 0 56 96 476 3.64 22 73 21 4 56 81 258 3.87 32 80 22 76 58 ]] 2]] 3.51 25 ]] 22 ZB 56 68 236 3.44 20 81 20 Mean 81 312 3.62 25 78 21 MMtlle SheHZme Z Non-ZID(51-90 m) 1 56 71 357 3.46 18 82 14 3 60 75 343 3.56 22 75 16 5 59 74 245 3.78 25 79 15 9 59 87 269 3.75 30 78 19 to- 62 74 224 3.72 27 83 14 12 58 66 228 3.6 23 81 18 13' 59 74 213 3.88 32 90 12 37' 56 80 298 3.82 28 91 14 68 52 85 2]] 3.92 32 92 15 69 52 8] 309 3.83 30 88 14 70 52 9] 388 3.9 31 84 15 71 52 98 323 3.96 33 85 16 72 55 74 332 3.55 20 79 15 73 55 86 433 3.45 20 78 18 74 57 79 379 3.41 19 78 10 75 60 82 327 3.0 25 76 17 ]] 60 67 248 3.48 21 ]] 20 78 63 80 325 3.54 21 71 15 ]9 65 93 353 3.72 28 80 13 80 65 ]9 399 3.41 1] 89 15 81 65 75 280 3.62 26 82 14 82 65 71 284 3.6 23 7 6 13 84 54 92 357 3.74 25 81 19 85 57 86 429 3.46 19 73 23 86 57 82 456 3.41 16 79 22 87 60 86 292 3.85 32 81 6 C 56 BB 149 3.97 33 90 i0 C2' 56 41 90 3.47 20 1. 30 CON 59 82 204 3.% 36 84 13 Mean 79 304 3.87 25 81 17 MMtlle ShellZ.3(91-120 mf 17' 91 74 337 3.73 23 83 12 to- 91 89 405 3.66 21 82 14 20' 100 ]6 289 3.7 27 89 18 23' 100 68 238 3.66 24 80 13 29` 100 85 356 3.84 28 85 20 33' 100 82 301 3.86 29 72 23 38' t00 66 389 337 21 88 26 5fi' 100 71 199 3.95 31 86 16 60' 100 82 327 389 29 82 20 83' 100 76 281 3.64 23 89 10 Mean ]] 312 3.73 26 84 iT Outer Shen(121-20m) 1 200 43 87 3.49 22 75 24 25' 200 3] ]4 3.36 19 64 27 2]' 200 51 143 3.51 21 73 24 39' 200 56 234 3.23 15 55 23 5]' 200 24 40 3.05 15 56 30 Table 2-8 continues. 2-13 Compliance Determinations Table 2-8 continued. 9Wti°n Depth(m) M8pec31eb Abundalnce H' SDI RI BRI 51' 200 34 71 3.27 17 81 22 63' 200 32 59 3.28 18 54 29 65' 200 33 78 3.08 16 63 20 C4' 187 27 62 2.92 13 84 36 Mean 11 94 1.24 17 85 26 Upper Slope/Canypn(201600 mJ 40' 303 29 56 3,21 16 NIA WA al- 303 26 53 2.93 14 NIA WA 1 303 20 45 2.73 9 NIA WA 1 241 20 46 2,65 9 NIA WA I 300 15 26 2,52 9 NIA WA 1 300 21 48 236 10 NIA WA fib' 300 13 22 2.39 0 NIA WA C5 2% 23 41 2,96 13 NIA WA Mean 21 42 2.72 11 NIA NIA Regional reference values(Tean(2,M)) Might 08 Middle Shelf 99(30-153) 393(79-1159) 383(2.824,32) 31(13-48) NC 15(2-26) 9yhlpeouar96ell 62(27-127) 190(43-532) 3.52(2.93 .19) 24(1241) NC 15(-2-33) elphepn Upper Slope 26(9-69) 70(13-258) 2.72(1.71-3.83) 11(4-20) NIA WA District hisMi summer va11(2005-2015 Fid.1Y.)iiii(radi Middle Shen zones 112(6-156) 452(11-820) 3.99(1.424.46) 35(451) 83(67-95) 17(8-23) Mid 6heff IDne 2.WINIn21D 91(33-138) 540(211-1491) 3.36(0.31 22(1-35) 48(1-83) 211 Morale Shen zone 2,U-10 100(29-143) 442(142-829) 3.74(2.291 29(5-52) 75(1-96) 19(10-57) Morale Shen Zone 101(67-146) 513(177-882) 3.79(3.0 .23) 28(1442) 02(65-93) 10(13-26) of ar Slwlf 48(23-80) 143(41-367) 3.31(2.S .95) 19(842) 73(42-100) 23(14-39) Upper SlapelCenypn 28(1449) 66(22-165) 2.90(2.313.40) 13 Q-21) 65(33-100) 25(1342) In Hornyhead Turbot, all liver tissue contaminant concentrations, except for LPCB, were generally similar between outfall and non-outfall stations (Table 2-12). The different EPCB values may have been attributed to the uneven sample sizes at the two sampling locations (n=1 vs n=6). One of the 10 English Sole individuals collected at the outfall station had notably elevated concentrations of EDDT (20,967 pg/kg) and EPCB (1,627 pg/kg) in its liver tissue which skewed the means. This is not cause for concern as elevated mean values have been historically attributed to high concentrations in one or two individuals in a sample (OCSD 2010). Comparison between sample sites is further confounded by the transitory nature of fishes because it is assumed that the location of capture is also the location of exposure. Generally, concentrations of contaminants in fish tissues are highest in fish residing near the source of the contaminant (Meams et al. 1991). However, demersal fish with large ranges may transport contaminants away from the source or be captured away from the primary location of exposure (Allen 2006). This appears to be the case for the single English Sole individual as EPCB and LDDT in sediment samples at the outfall were <14 pg/kg in the Summer 2015 and Winter 2016 surveys (see Sediment Geochemistry section above). Sport Fish Muscle Chemistry Arsenic levels were similar in sport fishes collected at the outfall and non-outfall zones. More importantly, all other fish muscle tissue contaminant levels at both zones were well below federal and/ or state human consumption guidelines (Table 2-13). These results indicate there is little risk from consuming fish from the monitored areas and compliance was achieved. Fish Health Fishes appeared normal in both color and odor in 2015-16, thus compliance was met. Furthermore, less than 1% of all fishes collected showed evidence of irregularities. The most common irregularity was the presence of the eye parasite Phrixocephalus cincinnatus on the Pacific Sanddab(Citharichthys sordidus),which occurred in —1% of the examined fish. These results are comparable to background 2-14 Compliance Determinations Table 2-9 Summary of infaunal community measures for each semi-annual station sampled during the Winter 2016 benthic survey, including regional and District historical values. ZID = Zone of Initial Dilution; NC = Not Calculated. station Depth(m) Total No. Total H' SDI m SRI of Species Abundance Middle shelf Zone 2,WiMln-ZID(51-90 m) 0 56 67 165 3.81 20 84 16 4 56 50 88 N. 26 86 9 76 58 56 118 3.69 27 89 11 26 56 56 117 3.75 28 81 17 Mean 57 122 3.73 28 85 13 Middle shelf Zona Z Non-ZID(51-90 m) 1 58 BT 168 3.85 29 89 14 3 fi0 74 183 3.90 33 84 10 5 59 77 290 3.86 27 95 10 9 59 57 115 3J2 29 91 10 12 58 59 113 3.73 32 90 13 68 52 79 224 3.99 34 91 15 fig 52 ]0 236 3.70 26 94 12 70 52 88 227 3.99 35 87 14 71 52 55 119 3.5 26 86 14 72 55 60 213 3.65 24 83 10 73 55 66 150 3.71 29 85 12 74 57 81 248 ZA5 32 93 10 75 60 5] 131 3.7 26 83 14 77 60 54 96 3.71 31 78 16 78 63 59 112 3.83 32 78 17 79 65 59 168 3.75 27 87 10 80 65 72 202 3.63 31 93 10 81 65 69 176 3.84 30 83 16 82 85 70 146 3.89 34 80 12 84 54 70 200 3.Bfi 33 89 12 85 57 70 168 3.85 30 88 19 86 57 63 i7 3.77 26 80 17 87 60 63 146 3.8 20 89 12 C 58 78 200 3.99 33 91 14 CON 59 73 180 3.97 32 89 12 Mean 68 ITS 3.82 30 87 13 Regional nefeed a values(nean(range)) Bight 08 Middle Shen 99(30-153) 393(79-1159) 3.0(2.824.32) 31(1348) NC 15(2-26) Diel hinte lwinter values(2005-2015 Fual Yll(mean(range)) Middle Shell Zone 2,Wllhii 85(35-128) 421(142-1230) 3.38(0.893.04) 22(1a7) 49(3-84) 28(16-05) Mleeie sherzoni s,Non-ZIB 90(45-142) 352(152-634) 3.74(2.874.32) 28(9,18) 77(4]-95) 19(111 levels found within the Southern California Bight (Perkins and Gartman 1997) and do not indicate a degraded biota. Liver Histopathology For the 2015-16 monitoring period,there were no differences in Homyhead Turbot liver histopathology among the outfall and non-outfall stations (Stuart and Forsgren 2016). In contrast, English Sole samples at the outfall exhibited slightly more liver tissue damage than those at the non-outfall station. However, the majority of samples at the outfall were not classified as irreparable. These results further demonstrate that the outfall is not an epicenter of disease. 2-15 Compliance Determinations 20 Zone ♦ Within-ZID . Non-ZID 40 3 60 E in 80 100 ♦..♦•♦..♦..............................♦.♦................ I g�T�eEiF�I d $se3$a=8 "semdFFa � 2��3ae-e�3*em?z Stations 2D Stress:0.21 Zone ♦ Within-ZID . Non-ZID CON-w N6 Similarity ' s ' 42 B:W Bd-W 81-5 0?6 12- •66W -W B W {S6 • • ]9 W{W• �. • any 12-$ fi8-6 • 0 ITS ]35 4 ♦ 8-W 6SW ' %W �6]f];w Br5 ]&6 • ]1345]5.6 .5 o-w ]1.W ]6 266 6W ]bW Figure 2-5 Dendrogram (top panel)and non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS)plot(bottom panel) of the infauna collected at within- and non-ZID stations along the Middle Shelf Zone 2 stratum forthe Summer 2015(S)and Winter 2016(W)benthic surveys.Stations connected by red lines in the dendrogram are not significantly differentiated based on the SIMPROF test. The 5 main clusters formed at a 42% similarity on the dendrogram are superimposed on the nMDS plot. 2-16 Compliance Determinations Table 2-10 Summary of epibenthic macroinvertebrate community measures for each semi-annual and annual(*)station sampled during the Summer 2015 and Winter 2016 trawl surveys, as well as District historical values. Nominal Total No'of 6lomau Season St atlon Depth Species Total Abundance (0p) N' SDI (m) Middle Shelf Zane 1(315 m) T2' 35 13 S4 0.04 2.05 5 T24' 36 17 101 0.09 2.22 5 T6' 36 13 47 0.05 1.99 4 T18- 36 3 1923 1.64 0.01 1 Mean 12 531 0.0 1.57 4 MitlEle ShetlZone 2,OuOall(51-90 m) T22 w 11 69 0.94 1.5T 3 Tt 55 12 57 1.10 1.58 2 Mean 12 63 1.02 1.58 3 Summer Middle ShetlZone Z Non-ou6atl(51-90 roll T23 58 11 183 0.85 1.35 3 T12 57 10 294 143 0.31 1 T17 6D 11 39 008 1.81 5 T11 60 9 2373 202 0.11 1 Mean 10 722 1.29 0.90 3 Outer SheM(121-200m) T10' 137 8 181 10.29 0.40 1 T25' 137 10 82 3.75 0.95 1 T14' 137 8 36 0.11 1.24 2 T19- 137 9 211 0.69 1.00 2 Mean 9 128 3.91 0.90 2 Mindle ShetlZone 2,Ou0a11(51-90 m) T22 60 12 156 0.33 1.49 3 T1 55 10 614 1.12 0.58 1 Mean 11 385 0J2 1.04 2 wine, Middle ShetlZone Z,Nonoubmill(51-90 m) T23 58 9 131 1,19 1,59 3 T12 57 9 66 0.13 1.71 4 T17 60 1 127 1.21 1.08 2 T11 60 9 1698 2.48 0.39 1 Mean 9 606 1.25 1.19 3 District holodcal values(an haddl surveys from 2005-2015 w)]mean(mn9e)] Middle SMlaon.1 12(4-23) 322(18-2592) 079(D 01344) 1.42(0.07-2.09) 3(14) Middle soar zone 2,o,41eu 12(7-18) 376(49-2204) 1.60(0.08-3.60) 1.31(0.18-2.12) 3(1-5) MmdIe SMlRone2.Non-dal 11 (5-18) 302(12-24%) 1,67(001-11.16) 1.34(0.06-2.43) 3(1-9) Over She6 10(3-15) 164(195 ) 3.47(0,03-19.31) 1.08(0.15-2 12) 2(1-8) 2-17 Compliance Determinations 40 � z(oe�* Outfalll ■ Non-out 60 c m E W 80 too rn rn rn w m rn 3 3 3 3 3 3 Stations 2DStre36:0.1 Zone s DT12-W Outfall ■ Non-out f all Similarity 42 T22-S Figure 2-6 Dendrogram (top panel)and non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) plot(bottom panel)of the epibenthic macroinvertebrates collected at outfall and non-outfall stations along the Middle Shelf Zone 2 stratum for the Summer 2015 (S) and Winter 2016 (W) trawl surveys. Stations connected by red lines in the dendrogram are not significantly differentiated based on the SIMPROF test. The single main cluster formed at a 42% similarity on the dendrogram is superimposed on the nMDS plot. 2-18 Compliance Determinations Table 2-11 Summary of demersal fish community measures for each semi-annual and annual (`) station sampled during the Summer 2015 and Winter 2016 trawl surveys, as well as District historical values. Nominal Total No.of TOWI Biomass Season Station Depth Biomass Abundance (k9) IF SDI FRI (m) Middle ShaZone 1(31-50 m) T2` 35 8 125 4.13 1.38 2 19 T24` 36 8 83 115 1.53 3 20 1` 36 9 147 2.18 1.14 2 23 T18 36 7 83 1.16 1.20 2 24 Mean 8 110 2.30 1.31 2 21 Middle Shell Zone Z Oullall(51-90 m) T22 60 15 344 24.33 0.95 1 26 T1 55 13 187 10.61 184 4 22 Mean 14 206 17.47 1.40 3 24 Summer M'du)e SheHZone Z Non-ouHall(51-90m) T23 58 12 307 19.74 097 1 28 T12 57 8 51 199 1.37 3 22 T17 60 10 163 7.40 1.53 3 17 T11 60 10 82 183 194 5 26 Mean 10 151 ]]4 1.45 3 23 Outer SheH(121-200mf T10` 137 14 616 ISM 1.60 3 13 T25` 137 19 543 19.20 1.67 3 6 T14- 137 14 404 9.91 1.55 3 12 T19` 137 21 1220 39.19 1.71 3 19 Mean 17 06 20.25 1.64 3 13 Middle Shell Zone Z Oulhell(5150 m) T22 60 13 203 10.50 1.64 3 23 T1 55 13 190 7,37 2.14 6 18 Mean 13 197 8.03 1.80 5 21 Winter Middle SheI1Zo1M 2.Non-ou0all(51-90 m) T23 58 13 235 1004 162 3 22 T12 57 14 260 10.12 1.82 3 26 T17 60 12 198 ]TT 1.57 3 32 T11 60 11 195 7.31 2.07 6 21 Mean 13 222 8.81 1." 4 25 OisMct Msloncal values(all Pawl surveys Imrn 2005-2015 Fv)(mean(mn9e)] Made Shelf 2nm1 12(2-16) 273(110-651) 5.84(1.88-12.72) 1.71(069-222) 4(2-6) 22(18-26) IAMM.Sheu mn ff oumall 14(5-21) 608(218-3227) 29.17(6.7 -102.05) 1.70(0.91-2.11) 3(1-5) 24(18-37) Mi441e8helfbne2,NonOuttall 15(3-25) 681(140-12274) 16.12 (2.28-13564) 1.73(0.14-2.29) 3(1-6) 23(13-31) Oular SM1e6 16(11-23) 686(260.2644) 17.70(2.60.66AI) 1.43(0]4-1.91) 3(1.5) 14(2-33) 2-19 Compliance Determinations so Zene5 •Nan-..Mall ♦O.M.II ]0 r m � N 1W stations a.so-em.ea Zones •Nan-..Mall ♦O.Mell ♦ "w-__�`\ Slmilanty nas • ■ mw • na ♦ mw nw ■ n. • Figure 2-7 Dendrogram (top panel)and non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) plot (bottom panel) of the demersal fishes collected at outfall and non-outlall stations along the Middle Shelf Zone 2 stratum for the Summer 2015 (S) and Winter 2016 (W) trawl surveys. Stations connected by red lines in the dendrogram are not significantly differentiated based on the SIMPROF test. The two main clusters formed at a 68% similarity on the dendrogram is superimposed on the nMDS plot. 2-20 Compliance Determinations ) / ; q ; /;7777 { q / / © © f !l ,31= ,! , ! ! ; 2 ; g;\R\\ ) ! ( § h / / 2A R ; \ ; \;\2\) ) } \\ / / g - R : / § #°/ _ !! g! N! ! n . . ) j =! { k G § ! \!\\\( k � B89 z z� _ . M f 0 k |! !] !i !) ! „ � / _ \ ; \l 2 ) . - 7 § ; 0 0 ! f{ | k I | { _ 2-21 Compliance Determinations CONCLUSIONS In summary, COP criteria for water quality were met and state and federal bacterial standards were also met at offshore stations. Sediment quality was not degraded by loading of measured chemical contaminants or by physical changes from the discharge of wastewater solids. This was corroborated by the absence of sediment toxicity in controlled laboratory tests and the presence of normal infaunal communities throughout the monitoring area. Fish and trawl invertebrate communities in the monitoring area were also healthy and diverse, and federal and state fish consumption guidelines were met. Altogether, these results indicate that the receiving environment was not degraded by the discharge of the treated wastewater, all permit compliance criteria were met, and environmental and human health were protected. 2-22 Compliance Determinations REFERENCES Allen, L.G.2006. Chapter 23: Pollution. In:The Ecology of Marine Fishes:California and Adjacent Waters(L.G. Allen, D.J. Pondella 11, and M.H. Hom-Eds). University of California. Allen, M.J., R.W. Smith, E.T. Jarvis, V. Raco-Rands, B.B. Bernstein, and K.T. Herbinson. 2005. Temporal trends in southern California coastal fish populations relative to 30-year trends in oceanic conditions. In: Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Annual Report 2003-2004 (S.B. Weisberg - Ed.). Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Westminster, CA. p. 264-285. Chavez, F.P., J.T. Pennington, C.G. Castro, J.P. Ryan, R.P. Michisaki, B. Schlining, P. Walz, K.R. Buck, A. McFadyen, and C.A. Collins. 2002. Biological and chemical consequences of the 1997-1998 El Nino in central California waters. Frog. Oceanogr. 54:205-232. Dodder, N., K. Schiff, A. Latker, and C.L. Tang. 2016. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Monitoring Program: IV. Sediment Chemistry. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Costa Mesa, CA. Hsieh,C.,C.Reiss,W.Watson, M.J.Allen,J.R. Hunter, R.N. Lea, R.H. Rosenblatt, P.E.Smith,and G.Sigihara. 2005. A comparison of long-term trends and variability in populations of larvae of exploited and unexploited fishes in the southern California region:A community approach. Prog. Oceanogr.67:160- 185. Jarvis, E.T., M.J.Allen, and R.W. Smith. 2004. Comparison of recreational fish catch trends to environment- species relationships and fishery-independent data in the Southern California Bight, 1980-2000. CaICOFI Rep.Vol. 45. Long, E.R., D.D. McDonald, S.L. Smith, and F.C. Calder. 1995. Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments. Environ. Manage. 19:81-97. Mearns, A.J., M. Matta, G. Shigenaka, D. MacDonald, M. Buchman, H. Harris, J. Goias, and G. Lauenstein. 1991. Contaminant Trends in the Southern California Bight: Inventory and Assessment. NOAATech. Memo. NOS ORCA 62: NOAA, Seattle, WA. OCSD(Orange County Sanitation District). 1996a.Science Report and Compliance Report,Ten Year Synthesis, 1985-1995. Marine Monitoring. Fountain Valley, CA. OCSD. 1996b.Water Quality Atlas. Ten-Year Synthesis, 1985-1995. Marine Monitoring. Fountain Valley,CA. OCSD. 2004. Annual Report, Science Report,July 2002-June 2003. Marine Monitoring. Fountain Valley,CA. OCSD. 2010. Annual Report, July 2008-June 2009. Marine Monitoring. Fountain Valley, CA. OCSD. 2013.Annual Report, July 2011-tune 2012. Marine Monitoring. Fountain Valley, CA. OCSD. 2014.Annual Report, July 2012-June 2013. Marine Monitoring. Fountain Valley, CA. OCSD. 2016.Annual Report, July 2014-June 2015. Marine Monitoring. Fountain Valley, CA. Perkins, P.S. and R. Gartman. 1997. Host-parasite relationship of the copepod eye parasite (Phrixocephalus cincinnatus) and Pacific sanddab (Citharichthys sordidus) collected from wastewater outfall areas. Bull. Southern Calif.Aced Sci. 96:87-104. Ranasinghe,J.A., K.C.Schiff,C.A. Brantley,L.L. Lovell, D.B.Cadien,T.K. Mikel, R.G.Velarde,S. Holt,and S.C. Johnson. 2012.Southern California Bight 2008 Regional Monitoring Program:VI. Benthic Macrofauna. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Costa Mesa, CA. State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 2012. Water Quality Control Plan - Ocean Waters of California. Sacramento, CA. Stuart, J. and K.L. Forsgren. 2016. Liver histopathology of Homyhead Turbot (Pleumnichthys verticalis) and English Sole (Pamphrys vetulus) collected from reference and wastewater outfall sites in Orange County, CA in 2015. Final Report Prepared for the Orange County Sanitation District. Fountain Valley, CA. 2-23 Compliance Determinations Wilber, D.H. and D.G. Clarke. 2001. Biological effects of suspended sediments: A review of suspended sediment impacts on fish and shellfish with relation to dredging activities in estuaries. No.Am.J. Fish. Manage.21:855-875, 2-24 CHAPTER 3 Strategic Process Studies and Regional Monitoring INTRODUCTION The Orange County Sanitation District (District) operates under the auspices of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued jointly by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board (Order No. R8- 2012-0035, NPDES Permit No. CA0110604)in June 2012. The permit requires the District to conduct an Ocean Monitoring Program(OMP)that documents the effectiveness of the District's source control and wastewater treatment operations in protecting coastal ocean resources and beneficial uses. A requirement of the OMP is to conduct Strategic Process Studies (SPS) and to participate in regional monitoring programs. In addition, the District performs special studies, which are generally less involved than SPS and have no regulatory requirement for prior approval or level of effort. SPS are designed to address unanswered questions raised by the Core monitoring program results or they may focus on issues of interest to the District, such as the effect of contaminants of emerging concern on local fish populations. Some SPS are enumerated in the NPDES permit. Other SPS are proposed and must be approved by state and/or federal regulators to ensure proper focus and level of effort. For the 2015-16 program year, no SPS were conducted. Regional monitoring studies are those not focused solely on the District's monitoring area, but which sample larger areas of the Southern California Bight. These may include the "Bight" studies coordinated by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) or studies conducted in coordination with other public agencies and/or non-governmental organizations in the region. Examples include the Central Region Kelp Survey Consortium and the Central Bight Water Quality Study. This chapter provides study overviews of recently completed and ongoing special studies and regional monitoring efforts. Unlike the other chapters in this report, these summaries are the most recent information available to dale. This chapter provides study summaries only and the projects described are not intended as comprehensive reports. When appropriate, this information is also incorporated in other report chapters to supplement Core monitoring results. Links to final study reports, if available, are listed under each section below. REGIONAL MONITORING Regional Nearshore (Surfzone) Bacterial Sampling The District partners with the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA), the South Orange County Wastewater Authority, and the Orange County Public Works in the Ocean Water Protection Program, a regional bacterial sampling program that samples 126 stations along 42 miles (67.5 km) of coastline (Seal Beach to San Clemente State Beach) and 70 miles (112.6 km) of harbor and bay 3-1 Strategic Process Studies and Regional Monitoring frontage. In 2015,over 8,600 samples were collected and analyzed for 3 fecal indicator bacteria(FIB; total coliform, fecal coliform, and enterococci). OCHCA reviews bacteriological data to determine whether a station meets Ocean Water-Contact Sports Standards (i.e., Assembly Bill 411; AB411), basing beach closures, postings, or health advisories on these results. The 2015 Annual Ocean, Harbor,and Bay Water Quality Report(OCHCA 2016) provides a countywide summary of beach bacteriological water quality. Included in the report are year-to-year variability and trends since 1987. A few of the countywide report findings for 2015 include: • The number of reported sewage spills (133)for 2015 represented a continued annual decline since 2002. • The number of beach closures due to sewage spills (10)was 53% below the 29-year average (19). • The total number of Beach Mile Days closures (18.9) due to sewage spills was below the 1999-2015 average (28.2). • Total Beach Mile Days posted due to bacteriological standards violations during the AB411 period (April 1 to October 31)was 36.2, which was just over 90% less than the record high of 366 in 2002. The District samples 38 of the 126 regional surfzone stations, of which 18 are legacy stations sampled since the 1970s (Figure 3-1). These legacy stations were analyzed separately for 2015- 16 for comparison with the District's historical surfzone results (Table B-12). Table B-13 presents summary statistics for the remaining stations. Results for the 18 District stations were similar to those of previous years (OCSD 2014, 2015, 2016). FIB counts at these stations varied by season, location, and by bacteria type. A general spatial pattern was associated with the mouth of the Santa Ana River. Seasonal geomeans and the percent of samples exceeding geomean and single sample standards all peaked near the river mouth and tapered off upcoast and downcoast. Collectively, exceedance of the state single sample standard(A6411)was low,with less than 4%for total coliforms, less than 6°% for fecal coliforms, and slightly over 7%for enterococci. Central Bight Regional Water Quality Program The District is a member of a regional cooperative sampling effort known as the Central Bight Regional Water Quality Monitoring Program (Central Bight) with the City of Oxnard, City of Los Angeles, the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles, and the City of San Diego. Each quarter, the participating agencies sample 301 stations that covers the coastal waters from Ventura County to Crystal Cove State Beach and from Point Loma to the United States—Mexico Border(Figure 3-2). The participants use similarly equipped CTDs and comparable field sampling methods. The District samples 66 stations, which include our 28 Core water quality program data as part of this effort. The Central Bight monitoring provides regional data that enhances the evaluation of water quality changes due to natural or anthropogenic discharges (e.g., stormwater) and provides a regional context for comparisons with the District's monitoring results. The Central Bight data also provides a link to other larger-scale regional programs, such as the California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations (CaICOFI) and serve as the basis for the Bight'13 Nutrients sampling. Currently, the Central Bight group is working to develop closer ties to the CaICOFI program and District staff are working with the regional Southern California Coastal Ocean Observing System (SCCOOS) to develop quality assurance guidelines for submitting Central Bight data to SCCOOS that complies with the national Integrated Ocean Observing System guidelines. Bight'13 Regional Monitoring Since 1994, the District has participated in 5 regional monitoring studies of environmental conditions within the Southern California Bight (SCB): 1994 Southern California Bight Pilot Project, Bight'98, 3-2 Strategic Process Studies and Regional Monitoring o�� —Raem ewm3e IN flown ,_ �n OUYIry Sbtim 6•'9 Mne Sblim le ,S3 O } Rede�I a am' o ry• 3N8 p o Phnom' 3150' 3wR fJ04 • i51 . ON HeM,1 8 h � 3 33R• 223' 11N. W' 0' 19 tot g k _ ' • 3335' 2003 1211 E� . z 3a3a s,s ., ocso Malin zan � - '�� — c 1h o,nmw�m b Figure 3-1 Offshore and Nearshore (surfzone)water quality monitoring stations for 2015-16. Bight'03, Bight'08, and Bight'13. The District has played a considerable role in all aspects of these regional projects, including program design, sampling, quality assurance, data analysis, and report writing. Results from these efforts provide information that is used by individual dischargers, resource managers, and the public to improve region-wide understanding of environmental conditions and to provide a regional perspective for comparisons with data collected from individual point sources. During the summer of 2013, District staff conducted field operations, ranging from Orange County south to Camp Pendleton in northern San Diego County and west to the southern end of Santa Catalina Island,as part of the Bight'13 sampling effort. Currently District staff is involved in final report production for the Bight'13 project. At this time, some Bight'13 final reports are available, with a few remaining reports expected to be available by December 2017. Project documents, data, and reports on the previous studies are available on SCCWRP's website (http://www.sccwrp.org). Regional Kelp Survey Consortium— Central Region The District is a member of the Central Region Kelp Survey Consortium (CRKSC),which was formed in 2003 to map Giant Kelp(Macrocystis pyrifera)beds off Ventura, Los Angeles,and Orange Counties via aerial photography. The program is modeled after the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region Nine Kelp Survey Consortium, which began in 1983. Both consortiums sample quarterly to count the number of observable kelp beds and calculate maximum kelp canopy coverage. Combined, the CRKSC and San Diego aerial surveys provide synoptic coverage of kelp beds along approximately 81% of the 270 miles (435 km)of the southern California mainland coast from northern 3-3 Strategic Process Studies and Regional Monitoring ccar�.Mh,ah. r� o so - - •'O' anms..oi.ao-Po •.i, Reclamation nnms..oi.ao-iwr $k Plank r Plant 2 Purr 2 0 ooso March zon oa Figure 3-2 Central Bight Water Quality Group monitoring stations for 2015-16. Ventura County to the United States—Mexico Border. Survey results are published and presented annually by MBC Applied Environmental Sciences to both consortium groups, regulators, and the public. Reports are available on the SCCWRP's website (http://kelp.sccwrp.org/reports.html). 2015 Central Region Results The number of kelp beds displaying canopy slightly decreased in the Central Region (21 of 26), however, the overall canopy cover increased by nearly 22.7% from 1.65 min (428 km2) in 2014 to 2.03 mil(526 km2) in 2015. Nine kelp beds had increased surface coverage (1--434%), 11 beds had decreased surface coverage(10-88%), 1 bed had no change, and 5 beds were not visible. However, total coverage in 2015 was still above the long-term (1965-2015) regional average of 1.68 mil (4.34 km2) (MBC 2016). Consistent with previous results, most of the Central Region kelp beds reached their maximum extent in early summer. There was no evidence of any adverse effects on Giant Kelp resources from any of the region's dischargers. Rather, the Giant Kelp surveys of 2015 continued to demonstrate that most kelp bed dynamics in the Central region are influenced by the large-scale oceanographic environment, while micro-variations in local topography and currents can cause anomalies in kelp bed performances. 3-4 Strategic Process Studies and Regional Monitoring Ocean Acidification Mooring Increased acidification of coastal waters is an issue that has become increasingly important along the west coast, as reflected by its incorporation into the State of California Ocean Protection Council's (OPC)most recent 5-year strategic plan (OPC 2012). The acidity/alkalinity(pH)of receiving waters is an important biologic parameter as it affects the solubility of calcium carbonate, a necessary building material for organisms with calcareous shells. Aragonite concentration is a conventional metric used to evaluate potential impacts to marine organisms with saturation values z1 considered necessary for calcium formation. Preindustrial surface pH has been estimated to be 8.16 and a pH value of 7.75 has been associated with an aragonite saturation of 1 (Orr et al. 2005, Feely at al. 2008, Bernie 2009, Bijma et al. 2009, Pelejero et al. 2010). Since 1985, an average of 11% of pH samples collected by the District fell below 7.75, with a range of<1% (1989 and 1991)to 33% (1998). Eutrophication and high nutrients levels have been linked to increased coastal acidification (NOAA 2012). While southern California experiences large nutrient inputs from natural spring upwelling, findings from the Bight'08 project showed that nutrients discharged from ocean outfalls off heavily urbanized regions were equivalent to these natural sources(Howard et al.2012). Additionally, Howard et al. (2012) showed that algal bloom intensity has increased significantly over the last decade and algal bloom 'hotspots' were shown to be co-located with major anthropogenic sources, including ocean outfalls, and extended water residence times. These findings led to the inclusion of enhanced nutrient and pH monitoring in the SCB as part of the Bight'l3 Nutrients program (SCCWRP 2013). Primary productivity and nutrient cycling (including oxygen demanding processes like nitrification) can have direct and indirect effects on the ecological condition of coastal waters. The California Ocean Plan (COP) establishes criteria for the amount of influence that anthropogenic wastewater dischargers are permitted to have on the ecological condition of coastal waters. These include criteria for nutrients ("shall not cause objectionable growth or degrade indigenous biota"), dissolved oxygen ("shall not be depressed by more than 10% of that which would occur naturally"), and pH ("shall not be changed more than 0.2 pH units"). However, how anthropogenic nutrients influence each of these is not well understood and existing pH sensors are not sensitive or stable enough to measure small changes in pH. The District's Ocean Acidification (OA) Mooring experienced problems with the pH sensors that required the mooring to be out of the water for most of 2015. Results have not been analyzed and the mooring was redeployed in October 2016. SPECIAL STUDIES California Ocean Plan Compliance Determination Method Comparison Background Southern California ocean dischargers maintain extensive monitoring programs to assess their effects on ambient receiving water quality and to determine compliance with COP standards. However, each agency uses a different approach for analyzing these data and determining COP compliance. In 2009, at the behest of the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), SCCWRP, in collaboration with dischargers, began developing a new method to establish an Out-of-Range occurrence (OROsccwRP) for dissolved oxygen (DO). Here we present a comparison, for the 2015-16 program year, between the District's standard approach used over the past 30 years and the newly developed SCCWRP method for DO. 3-5 Strategic Process Studies and Regional Monitoring Compliance Determinations District Approach Compliance evaluations for DO are based on statistical comparisons between 2 (inner and outer) reference stations located up-current of the outfall. For each survey, the presence and depth range of the pycnocline is calculated for each station with data binned into above, within, or below the pycnocline strata; when a pycnocline is absent, data are binned into the top, middle, or bottom third of the water column. Mean values for each parameter are calculated by stratum and station. Out- of-range occurrences (ORO...) are calculated by station for each depth strata and sampling date. District OROs are based on comparing each station with the corresponding reference station data to determine whether the station exceeded the COP compliance criteria (i.e., a 10%decrease in oxygen concentration values). To determine whether an OROocsD was Out-of-Compliance (OOC), distributional maps are created that identify the reference stations for each monthly survey and location of each ORODc,o. These maps are evaluated to determine if a logical OOC event is represented based on: (A) presence of the plume using a combination of temperature, density, salinity, Colored Dissolved Organic Matter (CDOM), ammonium (NH4+), and current direction; (B) water column features relative to naturally occurring events(e.g., high chlorophyll-a due to phytoplankton);and (C)unique station characteristics that may make them inappropriate for comparison with reference stations(e.g., excessive differences in depth strata). A detailed summary of the District's water quality compliance methodology is presented in Appendix A. SCCWRP Approach The methodology involves 3 steps: (A) identification of the area affected by effluent wastewater, (B) selection of reference sampling sites representing "natural" conditions, and (C) comparison between water quality profiles in the reference and plume-affected zones. Plume-affected areas are identified using CDOM as a wastewater indicator. Reference sites are selected from the areas around the ouffalls, excluding the sites affected by the effluent. Reference density profiles are calculated and the DO profiles in the plume zone are compared to the reference profiles and a maximum difference value is used to establish the number of OROsccwRP' Comparison Method The 2 methods differ in their approach to establishing OROs and the SCCWRP methodology does not calculate OOCs, therefore the following steps were taken to make the output of both approaches more comparable. Under the District approach, a station may have multiple OROocsD and/or OOC values on a given survey, while the SCCWRP approach identifies a single maximum difference value per station. For the comparison, monthly station OROocsD were recalculated as presence/absence when multiple ORODcsD occurred. Unlike the District method, the SCCWRP method does not provide a path to evaluate whether an ORO did or did not constitute an OOC. For this comparison, it was assumed that an OROsccw ,was equivalent to the District's OOC. Results and Discussion In general, the SCCWRP approach identifies fewer plume-impacted stations and OROs, while using a much greater, though variable, number of reference stations (Table 3-1). The primary source of these differences is probably the different approaches used in identifying plume-impacted stations. The District uses multiple parameters and contextual information (e.g., Is the station up-current of the ouffall?; Was there a large phytoplankton bloom?), either singly or in combination. ORO....., 3-6 Strategic Process Studies and Regional Monitoring Table 3-1 Comparison of District and SCCWRP California Ocean Plan compliance determinations for dissolved oxygen for program year 2015-2016. R Plume lmpaciW Station. xRefs..Station. IOW-O .n... M.Mb Year OCSD SCCWRP OCSD SCCWRP OCSD SCCWRP July 2015 0 4 2 17 0 0 AWust 2015 11 8 2 13 5 0 September 2015 10 6 2 13 0 0 Odober 2015 0 4 2 15 0 0 November 2015 12 4 2 17 0 0 December 2015 3 3 2 10 0 0 January 2016 8 2 2 10 1 0 February 2016 5 3 2 16 0 0 Mamb 2016 6 5 2 13 2 0 May 2016 7 8 2 10 1 0 May 2016 15 6 2 11 0 1 June 2016 8 7 2 16 0 0 events are established using only CDOM values that exceed the 85th percentile of all CDOM samples per survey. The SCCWRP approach also does not take into account values that are due to natural variability. For example, the single ORO SCCWRPvalue identified was at an offshore station (2306) on May 5, 2016. Currents were downcoast so Station 2306 was up-current of the ouffall and the station was being impacted by naturally occurring colder, more saline water that was intruding upon the shelf. Using the District's multi-parameter filter, this station would not have been categorized as OOC. The benefit of using the SCCWRP approach is its ability to be standardized so that all agencies are using the same methodology. One disadvantage to this approach is disregard of actual plume transport (i.e., currents) and changes due to natural variability. The District's approach identifies a greater number of ORO/OOCs, but it involves a greater amount of effort that is harder to replicate across agencies. 3-7 Strategic Process Studies and Regional Monitoring REFERENCES Bernie D. 2009. Mitigation scenarios of ocean acidification using simple and complex models. Work stream 2, Report 3 of the AVOID programme(AV/WS2/Dl/R03). Available online at www.avoid.uk.net Bijma, J., M. Barange, L. Brander, G. Cardew, J. de Leeuw, R. Feely, L. Fernand, G. Ganssen, J.P. Gattuso, M.G. DSvila, P. Haugan, H. Held, M. Hood, T. Kiefer,A. Kozyr, J. Orr, H.O. Portner, K. Rehdanz, G.J. Reichart, P.G. Rodhouse, F. Schmidt, M.Thorndyke, C.Turley, E. Urban, P.Ziveri, E. Lipiatou, B.Avril, and D. Turk. 2009. Impacts of ocean acidification. In European Science Foundation, Science Policy Briefing 37, 1-12. Feely, R.A., C.L.Sabine,J. Hernandez-Ayon,J. Martin, D. lanson, and B. Hales. 2008. Evidence for upwelling of corrosive"acidified"water onto the Continental Shelf. Science 320:1490-1492. Howard, M.D.A., G. Robertson, M. Sutula, B.H. Jones, N.P. Nezlin, Y Chao, H. Frenzel, M.J. Mengel, D.A. Caron,B.Seegers,A.Sengupta,E.Seubert,D.W.Diehl,and S.B.Weisberg. 2012. Southern California Bight 2008 Regional Monitoring Program:VII. Water Quality. 145 p. MBC Applied Environmental Sciences (MBC). 2015. Status of the Kelp Beds 2014 Survey. Prepared for the Central Region Kelp Survey Consortium and Region Nine Kelp Survey Consortium. 75 p.+Appendices. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA). 2012. Study finds that ocean acidification is accelerated in nutrient-rich areas. hftp://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories20l2/20120924_ oceanacidification.html (September 24,2012). Orange County Health Care Agency(OCHCA).2016. 2015 Annual Ocean,Harbor&Bay Water Quality Report. September 2016. 68 p. http://www.ocbeachinfo.com Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). 2014. Annual Report, July 2012-June 2013. Marine Monitoring. Fountain Valley, CA. OCSD. 2015. Annual Report,July 2013-June 2014. Marine Monitoring. Fountain Valley, CA. Ocean Protection Council (OPC). 2012. A Vision for Our Ocean and Coast. Five-Year Strategic Plan 2012- 2017. Adopted February 17,2012. 34 p. Orr, J.C., V.J. Fabry, O.Aumont, L. Bopp, S.C. Doney, R.A. Feely, A. Gnanadesikan, N. Gruber,A. Ishida, F. Joos, R.M. Key, K. Lindsay, E. Maier-Reimer, R. Matear, P. Monfray, A. Mouchet, R.G. Najjar, G.K. Plattner,K.B. Rodgers,C.L.Sabine,J.L.Sarmiento,R.Schlitzer, R.D.Slater, I.J.Totterdell,M.F.Weing, Y.Yamanaka, and A. Yool. 2005. Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature 437:681-686. Pelejero,C., E.Calvo,and O. Hoegh-Guldberg. 2010. Paleo-perspectives on ocean acidification. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25:332-344. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project(SCCWRP). 2013. Southern California Bight 2013 Marine Monitoring Survey(Bight'13) Nutrients Workplan. 22 p. 3-8 APPENDIX A Methods r � INTRODUCTION This appendix contains a summary of the field sampling,laboratory testing,and data analysis methods used in the District's Ocean Monitoring Program (OMP). The methods also include calculations of water quality compliance with California Ocean Plan (COP)criteria. WATER QUALITY MONITORING Field Methods Offshore Zone Permit-specified water quality monitoring was conducted 3 times per quarter at 28 stations (Figure 2-1). Eight stations located inshore of the 3-mile line of the coast are designated as areas used for water contact sports by the Regional Water Quality Control Board(i.e.,waters designated as REC-1), and were sampled an additional 3 days per quarter for fecal indicator bacteria (FIB). The additional surveys were conducted in order to calculate a 30-day geometric mean. Each survey included measurements of pressure (from which depth is calculated), temperature, conductivity (from which salinity is calculated), dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, water clarity (light transmissivity, beam attenuation coefficient [beam-c], and photosynthetically active radiation [PAR]), chlorophyll-a fluorescence, and colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM). Measurements were conducted using a Sea-Bird Electronics SBE 911 plus conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) profiling system deployed from the MN Nerissa. Profiling was conducted at each station from 1 m below the surface to 2 m above the bottom or to a maximum depth of 75 m, when water depths exceeded 75 m. SEASOFT(2016a)software was used for data acquisition,data display,and sensor calibration. PAR was measured in conjunction with chlorophyll-a because of the positive linkage between light intensity and photosynthesis per unit chlorophyll (Hardy 1993). Wind condition, sea state, and visual observations of floatable materials or grease that might be of sewage origin were also conducted. Discrete water samples were collected using a Sea-Bird Electronics Carousel Water Sampler (SBE 32) equipped with Niskin bottles for ammonium (NH3-N) and FIB at specified stations and depths. All discrete samples were kept on wet ice in coolers and transported to the District's laboratory within 6 hours. A summary of the sampling and analysis methods is presented in Table A-1. Central Bight Regional Water Quality An expanded grid of water quality stations was sampled quarterly as part of the District's Central Bight Regional Water Quality monitoring. These 38 stations were sampled in conjunction with the 28 Core water quality stations (see Figure 3-1) along with the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles, the City of Los Angeles, and the City of Oxnard. The total sampling area extends from the Ventura River in the north to Crystal Cove State Beach in the south. Data were collected using CTDs in a fixed-grid A-1 __s ! § !\ !! 1 E ! \ { } } / } / / / / } � } } / \ � / \ / / / \ } \ � 0000 \0 / / � ) / ` ) \/ • / . ! ! ! _ : { ! { ! J { ` , ) ) /\! / / ! \ . � 22 ( / { b | \ ! ! § � { � I2 ) E \ \ � \ { \ \ Min Methods pattern comprising 216 stations during a targeted 3 to 4 day period. Parameters measured included pressure, water temperature, conductivity, DO, pH, chlorophyll-a, CDOM, and water clarity. Profiling was conducted from the surface to 2 m from the bottom or to a maximum depth of 100 m. Sampling and analytical methods were the same as those presented in Table A-1. Nearshore Zone Regional nearshore(surfzone) FIB samples were collected 1-2 days per week at a total of 38 stations (Figure 3-1). When water from creek/storm drain stations flowed to the ocean, a bacteriological sample was collected at the source, 25 yards downcoast, and 25 yards upcoast. When flow was absent, a single sample was collected 25 yards downcoast. Samples were collected in ankle-deep water, with the mouth of the sterile bottle facing an incoming wave but away from both the sampler and ocean bottom. After the sample was taken, the bottle was tightly capped and promptly stored on ice in the dark. The occurrence and size of any grease particles at the high tide line were also recorded. Laboratory analysis of FIB samples began within 6 hours of collection. Laboratory Methods Laboratory analyses of NH3-N and bacteriology samples followed methods listed in Table A-1. Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures included analysis of laboratory blanks and duplicates. All data underwent at least 3 separate reviews prior to being included in the final database used for statistical analysis, comparison to standards, and data summaries. Data Analyses Raw CTD data were processed using both SEASOFT(2016b)and third party(IGODS 2012)software. The steps included retaining downcast data and removing potential outliers, i.e. data that exceeded specific criteria limits. Flagged data were removed if they were considered to be due to instrument failures,electrical noise(e.g., large data spikes),or physical interruptions of sensors(e.g.,by bubbles) rather than by actual oceanographic events. After outlier removal, averaged 1 m depth values were prepared from the downcast data; if there were any missing 1 m depth values, then the upcast data were used as a replacement. CTD and discrete data were then combined to create a single data file that contained all sampled stations for each survey day. Compliance Determinations COP compliance was assessed based on: (1) specific numeric criteria for DO, pH, and 3 FIB (total and fecal celiform and enterococci); and (2)narrative(non-numeric)criteria for transmissivity,floating particulates, oil and grease, water discoloration, beach grease, and excess nutrients. Dissolved Oxygen, pH. and Transmissivity Station locations were defined as either Zone A(stations inshore of the 3-mile limit for state waters) or Zone B (offshore of the 3-mile limit) as shown in Figure A-1. Compliance evaluations for DO, pH, and transmissivity were based on statistical comparisons to the corresponding Zone A or Zone B reference station located upcurrent of the outfall (OCSD 1999). For each survey, the depth of the pycnocline layer, if present, was calculated for each station using temperature and salinity data. The pycnocline is defined as the depth layer where stability is greater than 0.05 kg/m3(Officer 1976). Data for each station and numeric compliance parameter(transmissivity, dissolved oxygen, and pH)were binned by water column stratum: above, within, or below the pycnocline. When a pycnocline was absent, data were binned into the top, middle, or bottom third of the water column for each station. Mean values for each parameter were calculated by stratum and station. The number of observations usually differed from station to station and survey to survey due to different water and pycnocline depths. The selection of appropriate reference stations (i.e., upceast or downcoast)for each survey A-3 Methods HuWn9•n Ghnn BueM1 NO3 , R]61 O WM3 R1pp• HB—h _ �• R9Al RM5• , f E Rx]• • aou• E353•' `� OnB4 yam• - '•. zeoc• � `L... 11.0 R,m• , `. xxxe• e m� 9B5• , 1211 aom _ R106U `• '21 11 �\ 5 Of.501 ]01] rcm —puenoWXeilsPom•gianSe S�acun 1 +, Figure A-1 Water quality monitoring stations and zones used for compliance determinations. day were determined based on available current measurements and the presence or absence of typical plume "signals" (e.g., elevated ammonium, FIB, and CDOM). If the choice of a reference station was indeterminate, then the data were analyzed twice using both upcoast and downcoast reference stations. Once reference stations were determined,the data were analyzed using in-house MATLAB (2007) routines to calculate out-of-range occurrences (OROs) for each sampling date and parameter. These OROs were based on comparing the mean data by stratum and station with the corresponding reference station data to determine whether the following criteria were exceeded: • Dissolved oxygen: cannot be depressed >10% below the mean; • pH: cannot be greater than t 0.2 pH units of the mean; and • Natural light (defined as transmissivity): shall not be significantly reduced, where statistically different from the mean is defined as the lower 95% confidence limit. In accordance with permit specifications,the outfall station(2205)was not included in the comparisons because it is within the zone of initial dilution (ZID). To determine whether an ORO was out-of-compliance (OOC), distributional maps were created that identified the reference stations for each sampling date and location of each ORO, including which stratum was out of range. Each ORO was then evaluated to determine if it represented a logical DOC event. These evaluations were based on: (A) evaluation of the wastewater plume location relative to depth using a combination of temperature, density, salinity, CDOM, and when available, A-4 Methods FIB and NH3-N; (B) evaluation of features in the water column relative to naturally occurring events (i.e., high chlorophyll-a due to phytoplankton); and (C) unique characteristics of some stations that may not be comparable with permit-specified reference stations (2104/2105 or 2404/2406) due to differences in water depth and/or variable oceanographic conditions. For example, Zone A Stations 2103, 2203,2303, and 2403 are located at shallower depths than reference Station 2104. Waves and currents can cause greater mixing and resuspension of bottom sediments at shallower stations under certain conditions (e.g., winter storm surges). This can result in naturally decreased water clarity (transmissivity) that is unrelated to the wastewater discharge. An ORO can be in-compliance if, for example, a downcurrent station is different from the reference, but no intermediate (e.g., nearfeld) stations exhibited OROs. Once the total number of DOC events was summed by parameter, the percentage of OROs and OOCs were calculated according to the total number of observations. In a typical year, Zone A has a total of 504 possible comparisons if 14 stations (not including the reference station) and 3 strata over 12 survey dates per year are used. For Zone B,432 comparisons are possible from 12 stations (not including the reference station), 3 strata, and 12 sampling dates. The total combined number of ORO and OOC events was then determined by summing the Zone A and Zone B results. When all of the strata are not present (e.g. below thermocline at shallow stations) or additional surveys are conducted, the total number of comparisons in the analysis may be more or less than the target number of comparisons possible (936). Fecal Indicator Bacteria (FIB) FIB compliance used corresponding bacterial standards at each REC-1 station and for stations outside the 3-mile state limit. FIB counts at individual REC-1 stations were averaged per survey and compliance for each FIB was determined using the following COP criteria (SWRCB 2010): 30-day Geometric Mean • Total coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 mL. • Fecal coliform density shall not exceed 200 per 100 mL. • Enterococci density shall not exceed 35 per 100 mL. Single Sample Maximum • Total coliform density shall not exceed 10,000 per 100 mL. • Fecal coliform density shall not exceed 400 per 100 mL. • Enterococci density shall not exceed 104 per 100 mL. • Total coliform density shall not exceed 1,000 per 100 mL when the fecal coliform/total coliform ratio exceeds 0.1. Additionally, the District's permit includes the following USEPA Primary Recreation Criteria for Enterococcus(EPA 1994a). • 30-day geometric mean: Density less than 35 per 100 mL. • Single sample: Density less than 104 per 100 mL for designated bathing beaches. • Single sample: Density less than 158 per 100 mL for moderate use. • Single sample: Density less than 276 per 100 mL for light use. • Single sample: Density less than 501 per 100 mL for infrequent use. For purposes of this report, compliance with the EPA criteria was based on infrequent use. Determinations of fecal coliform compliance were accomplished by multiplying E. coli data by 1.1 to obtain a calculated fecal coliform value. There are no compliance criteria for FIB at the nearshore stations. Nevertheless, FIB data were given to the Orange County Health Agency (which follows State Department of Health Service A-5 Methods AB411 standards)for the Ocean Water Protection Program (http://ocbeachinfo.com/); and are briefly discussed in Chapter 2. Nutrients and Aesthetics These compliance determinations were done based on presence/absence and level of potential effect at each station. Station groupings are shown in Table B-4 and are based on relative distance and direction from the outfall. Compliance for the floating particulates, oil and grease, and water discoloration were determined based on presence/absence at the ocean surface for each station. Compliance with the excess nutrient criterion was based on evaluation of NH3-N compared to COP objectives for chronic(4 Drill and acute(6 mg/L)toxicity to marine organisms. Compliance was also evaluated by looking at potential spatial relationships between NH3-N distribution and phytoplankton (using chlorophyll-a fluorescence). SEDIMENT GEOCHEMISTRY MONITORING Field Methods Sediment samples were collected for geochemistry analyses from 29 semi-annual stations in July 2015 (summer) and in January 2016 (winter) as well as from 39 annual stations in July 2015 (Figure 2-2). In addition, 2-3 L of sediment was collected from Stations 0, 1, 4, 72, 73, 76, 77, CON, and ZB in January 2016 for sediment toxicity testing. Each station was assigned to 1 of 6 station groups: (1) Middle Shelf Zone 1 (31-50 m); (2) Middle Shelf Zone 2, within-ZID (51-90 m); (3) Middle Shelf Zone 2, non-ZID (51-90 m); (4) Middle Shelf Zone 3 (91-120 ni (5) Outer Shelf(121-200 m); and (6) Upper Slope/Canyon (201-500 m). In Chapter 2, the Middle Shelf Zone 2, within- and non-ZID station groups are simply referred to as within-ZID and non-ZID stations, respectively. A single sample was collected at each station using a paired 0.1 m2 Van Veen grab sampler deployed from the MN Nerissa. All sediment samples were qualitatively and quantitatively assessed for acceptability prior to processing. Samples were deemed acceptable if they had a minimum depth of 5 cm. However, if 3 consecutive sediment grabs each yielded a depth of<5 cm at a station, then the depth threshold was lowered to s4 cm. The top 2 cm of the sample was transferred into separate containers and a resealable plastic bag using a stainless steel scoop (Table A-2). The sampler and scoop were rinsed thoroughly with filtered seawater prior to sample collection. All sediment samples were transported on wet ice to the laboratory. Sample storage and holding limes followed specifications in the District's Environmental Laboratory and Ocean Monitoring Standard Operating Procedures (ELOM SOP) (OCSD 2015; Table A-2). Table A-2 Sediment collection and analysis summary during 2015-16. * = Available online at: www.epa.gov. Parameter Container P....".. bell Tim. Method Dissolve]Sulfides HDPE container Freeze 6moMe ELOM SOP 4500.8 G RevB Grein Size Plastic bag so Bmontbe Plumb(1981) Mercury Amber glass jar Freeze 6monlbs ELOM SOP 245.1 B Rai F Metals Amber glass jar Freeze 6 mpmbs ELOM SOP 200.8B_SED Rev E Sediment Toxicity HOPE container 4oC 2monibs ELOM SOP 8810 Total Chlorinated Pesticides(£Peal) Glass jar Freeze 6 roxi ELOM SOP 8000-SPP Total DDT(£DDT) Glass jar Freeze 6 mprth. ELOM SOP 80001 Total Nitrogen(TN) Glass jar Freeze 6moMba EPA 351.2M and!353.2ND Total Oyanic Carbon(TOG) Glass jar Freeze 6moMe EPA9060' Total Phosphorus TP) Glass jar Freeze 6montba EPA6010B• Total Polychlormaled Biphenyls(£PCB) Glass jar Freeze 6 months ELOM SOP 8000-SPP Total Potycycllc Aromatic Hydmicaiboas(£PAH) Glass jar Freeze 6moMbs ELOM SOP 8000-SPP A-6 Methods Laboratory Methods Sediment grain size, total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen, and total phosphorus samples were subsequently transferred to local and interstate laboratories for analysis (see Appendix C). Sample transfers were conducted and documented using required chain of custody protocols through the Laboratory Information Management Systems software. All other analyses were conducted by District lab staff. Sediment chemistry and grain size samples were processed and analyzed using the methods listed in Table A-2. The measured sediment chemistry parameters are listed in Table A-3. Method blanks, analytical quality control samples(duplicates, matrix spikes,and blank spikes),and standard reference Table A-3 Parameters measured in sediment samples during 2015-16. Monte Antimony Cadmium Lead Selenium Arsenic Chromium Mercury Silver Barium Copper Nickel Lnc Beryllium Chlorinate!Pesticides ChloNene Denrelh ea and Dieldn Aldnn Endowlfen-alpha gamma811C Hexachlombenzene cla-ChIM.na Endosulfan-a0a Heptachlor mi. hens-Chlordane End.O n-sulfele Heptachlor epoxide tans-Nonachlor Dlelddn Endrin DDT Den4,&Vwa 24'-DDD(o,p'-DDD) 2,4'-DDE(o,p'-DDE) 2,4'_DDT(4p'-DDT) 4,4'-DDMU 4,4'-DDD(p,p'-DDD) 4,4'-DDE(pp'-DDE) 4p'-DDT(pp'-DDT) Polychlorinated Blphenyl(PCB)Congeners PCB 18 PCB 81 PCB 126 PCB 170 PCB 28 PCB 87 PCB 128 PCB 177 PCB 37 PCB 99 PCB t38 PCB 180 PCB 44 PCB 101 PCB 149 PCB 183 PCB 49 PCB 105 PCB 151 PCB 187 PCB 52 PCB 110 PCB 1531168 PCB 189 PCB 66 PCB 114 PCB 156 PCB 194 PCB 70 PCB 118 PCB t57 PCB 201 PCB 74 PCB 119 PCB 167 PCB 206 PCB 77 PCB 123 PCB 169 Polycyelic Aromatic Hydrocarbon(PAN)Compounds Aoenaphd,ene Benzo[g.gi]perylene Fluoranihene 1-M.thylnaphM.lene Acenaphthoane Bewn(k]0uorandiere Ruorene 2-Melhylnaphlhalene AnMracene Biphenyl Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene 2,6-Dimelhylnaphd,alene Benz(a]artl Chr Gene Naphthalene 1,6,7-TmnethylnapMbalene Benzo[a]pyrsne Dibenz[a,h]anthracens PeD'lene 2,3,6-Tnmethylnaphthalene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Dibenzothiophcns Phcnanthrene 1-McMylphcnanthrene Benzo(elpymne Pyrene Other Parameters DlssoNed SUlOdes Total Nitrogen Total Organic Carbon Tend Phosphows Grain Size materials were prepared and analyzed with each sample batch. Total polychlorinated biphenyls (FPCB)and total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(EPAH)were calculated by summing the measured value of each respective constituent listed in Table A-3. Total dichlorodipheynitrichloroethane (IDDT) represents the summed values of 4,4'-DDMU and the 2,4-and 4,4'-isomers of DDD, DDE, and DDT, and total chlorinated pesticides (EPest) represents the summed values of 13 chlordane derivative compounds plus dieldrin. Sediment toxicity was conducted using the 10-day Eohaustorius estuarius amphipod survival test (EPA 1994). Amphipods were exposed to test and home(control)sediments,and the percent survival in each was determined. A-7 Methods Data Analyses All analytes that were undetected (i.e., value below the method detection limit) are reported as NO (not detected) in Tables 2-3 to 2-6. Further, an ND value was treated as zero for calculating a mean analyte concentration; however, if a station group contained all NDs for a particular analyte, then the mean analyte concentration is reported as ND. Sediment contaminant concentrations were evaluated against sediment quality guidelines known as Effects Range-Median (ERM) (Long at al. 1998). The ERM guidelines were developed for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Status and Trends Program (NOAA 1993) as non-regulatory benchmarks to aid in the interpretation of sediment chemistry data and to complement toxicity, bioaccumulation, and benthic community assessments (Long and MacDonald 1998). The ERM is the 50th percentile sediment concentration above which a toxic effect frequently occurs (Long at al. 1995), and as such, an ERM exceedance is considered a significant potential for adverse biological effects. Bight'13 sediment geochemistry data (Dodder at al. 2016) were also used as benchmarks. Data analysis consisted of summary statistics and qualitative comparisons only. Toxicity threshold criteria applied in this report were consistent with those of the Water Quality Control Plan for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries — Part 1 Sediment Quality (Bay at al. 2009, SWRCB 2009). Stations with statistically different (p<0.05) survival rates when compared to the control, determined by a two sample West, were categorized as nontoxic when survival was 90-100% of the control, lowly toxic when survival was 82-89%of the control,and moderately toxic when survival was 59-81% of the control. Stations with no statistically different (p>0.05) survival rates when compared to the control were categorized as nontoxic when survival was 82-100%of the control and lowly toxic when survival was 59-81% of the control. Any station exhibiting survival less than 59% of the control was categorized as highly toxic. BENTHIC INFAUNA MONITORING Field Methods A paired, 0.1 m2 Van Veen grab sampler deployed from the MN Nefissa was used to collect a sediment sample from 29 semi-annual stations in July 2015 (summer) and in January 2016 (winter) as well as from 39 annual stations in July 2015(Figure 2-2). The purpose of the semi-annual surveys was to determine long-term trends and potential effects along the 60 m depth contour, while the annual survey was conducted primarily to assess the spatial extent of the influence of the effluent discharge. Each station was assigned to 1 of 6 depth categories as described above in the sediment geochemistry field methods section. All sediment samples were qualitatively and quantitatively assessed for acceptability prior to processing as described above in the sediment geochemistry field methods section. At each station, acceptable sediment in the sampler was emptied into a 63.5 cm x 45.7 cm x 20.3 cm (25 in x 18 in x 8 in) plastic tray and then decanted onto a sieving table whereupon a hose with a fan spray nozzle was used to gently wash the sediment with filtered seawater through a 40.6 cm x 40.6 cm (16 in x 16 in), 1.0 mm sieve. Organisms retained on the sieve were rinsed with 7% magnesium sulfate anesthetic into one or more 1 L plastic containers and then placed in a cooler containing ice packs. After approximately 30 minutes in the anesthetic, animals were fixed by adding full strength buffered formaldehyde to the container to achieve a 10%, by volume, solution. Samples were transported to the District's laboratory for further processing. Laboratory Methods After 3-10 days in formalin, samples were rinsed with tap water and then transferred to 70% ethanol for long-term preservation. Samples were sent to Marine Taxonomic Services, Inc. (San Marcos, CA) to be sorted to 5 major taxonomic groups, Polychaeta, (worms), Mollusca (snails, clams, etc.), A-8 Methods Arthropods (shrimps, crabs, etc.), Echinodermata (sea stars, sea urchins, etc.), and miscellaneous phyla (Cnidaria, Nemertea, etc.). Removal of organisms was monitored to ensure that at least 95% of all organisms were successfully separated from the sediment matrix (see Appendix C). Upon completion of sample sorting, the major taxonomic groups were distributed for identification and enumeration (Table A-4). Taxonomic differences were resolved and the database was edited accordingly (see Appendix C). Species names used in this report follow those given in Cadien and Lovell (2016). Table A-4 Benthic infauna sample distribution for 2015-16. Taxonomic Groups Quarter Survey Annelids Adhmpoda Mollusw Echlno ermata Misc.Phyla OCSO Con- OCSU Can- OCSU Can- OCSD Can- OCSD Con- tractor tractor tractor tractor tractor Summer2015 SemFannuel 28 1 0 29 14 15 0 29 0 29 Summer 2015 Annual 36 3 39 0 20 19 39 0 39 0 winter 2016 Samiannual 18 11 0 29 1s 14 0 29 0 29 Data Analyses Infaunal community data were analyzed to determine if populations outside the ZID were affected by the outfall discharge. Six community measures were used to assess infaunal community health and function: (1) total number of species (richness), (2) total number of individuals (abundance), (3) Shannon-Wiener Diversity (H'), (4) Swartz's 75% Dominance Index (SDI), (5) Infaunal Trophic Index (ITI), and (6) Benthic Response Index (BRI). H' was calculated using Toga (Zar 1999). SDI was calculated as the minimum number of species with combined abundance equal to 75% of the individuals in the sample (Swartz 1978). SDI is inversely proportional to numerical dominance, thus a low index value indicates high dominance (i.e., a community dominated by a few species). The ITI was developed by Word (1978, 1990)to provide a measure of infaunal community"health" based on a species'mode of feeding (e.g., primarily suspension vs. deposit feeder). ITI values greater than 60 are considered indicative of a "normal" community, while 30-60 represent a "changed" community, and values less than 30 indicate a "degraded" community. The SRI measures the pollution tolerance of species on an abundance-weighted average basis (Smith at al. 2001). This measure is scaled inversely to ITI with low values (<25) representing reference conditions and high values (>72) representing defaunation or the exclusion of most species. The intermediate value range of 25-34 indicates a marginal deviation from reference conditions, 35-44 indicates a loss of biodiversity, and 45-72 indicates a loss of community function. The ITI and BRI were not calculated for stations >200 m in depth following recommendations provided by Word (1978) and Ranasinghe et al. (2012), respectively. The BRI was used to determine compliance with NPDES permit conditions, as it is a commonly used southern California benchmark for infaunal community structure and was developed with the input of regulators (Ranasinghe at al. 2007, 2012). The District's historical infauna data from the past 10 monitoring periods, as well as Bight'08 infauna data (Ranasinghe at al. 2012), were also used as benchmarks. The presence or absence of certain indicator species (pollution sensitive and pollution tolerant)was also determined for each station. The presence of pollution sensitive species, i.e., Amphiodia urtica (brittlestar)and amphipod crustaceans in the genera Ampelisca and Rhepoxynius,typically indicates the existence of a healthy environment, while the occurrence of large numbers of pollution tolerant species, i.e., Capitella capitata Cmplx (polychaete), may indicate stressed or organically enriched environments. Patterns of these species were used to assess the spatial and temporal influence of the wastewater discharge in the receiving environment. A-9 Methods PRIMER v6 (2001) multivariate statistical software was also used to examine the spatial patterns of infaunal invertebrate communities at the Middle Shelf Zone 2 stations. The other stations were excluded from the analyses, as Clarke and Warwick (2001) advocated that clustering is less useful and may be misleading where there is a strong environmental forcing, such as depth. Analyses included (1) hierarchical clustering with group-average linking based on Bray-Curtis similarity indices and similarity profile (SIMPROF) permutation tests of the clusters, (2) ordination of the same data using non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS)to confirm hierarchical clustering, and(3)similarity percentages (SIMPER) routine to determine the species contributing to the dissimilarity between groupings. Prior to the calculation of the Bray-Curtis indices, the data were square root transformed in order to down-weight the highly abundant species and to incorporate the less common species (Clarke and Warwick 2001). TRAWL COMMUNITIES MONITORING Field Methods Demersal fishes and epibenthic macroinvertebrates (EMIs) were collected by trawling in July and August, 2015 (summer) and in January and March, 2016 (winter). Sampling was conducted at 15 stations: Inner Shelf (18 m) Station TO; Middle Shelf Zone 1 (36 m) Stations T2, T24, T6, and T18; Middle Shelf Zone 2 (60 m) Stations T23, T22, T1, T12, T17, and T11; and Outer Shelf (137 m) Stations T10, T25, T14, and T19 (Figure 2-3). Only Middle Shelf, Zone 2 stations were sampled in both summer and winter; the remaining stations were sampled in summer only. Station TO was sampled to maintain the long-term abundance records of fishes and EMIs at this site. Data for this historical station are not discussed in this report, however. A minimum of 1 trawl was conducted from the MN Nerissa at each station using a 7.6 m (25 ft)wide, Marinovich, semi-balloon otter trawl (2.54 cm mesh) with a 0.64 cm mesh cod-end liner, an 8.9 m chain-rigged foot rope, and 23 m long trawl bridles following regionally adopted methodology(Mearns and Allen 1978). The trawl wire scope varied from a ratio of approximately 5:1 at the shallowest stations to approximately 3:1 at the deepest station. To minimize catch variability due to weather and current conditions,which may affect the bottom-time duration of the trawl,trawls generally were taken along a constant depth at each station, and usually in the same direction. Established trawl QA/QC methods for southern California were used (see Appendix C). Station locations and trawling speeds and paths were determined using Global Positioning System navigation. Trawl depths were determined using a Sea-Bird Electronics SBE 39 pressure sensor attached to one of the trawl boards. Upon retrieval of the trawl net, the contents (fishes and EMIs) were emptied into a large flow- through water tank and then sorted by species into separate containers. Fish bioaccumulation and hislopathology specimens were counted, recorded, and removed for processing (see Fish Tissue Contaminants Monitoring and Fish Health Monitoring sections below). The remaining fish specimens were processed as follows: (1) a minimum of 15 arbitrarily selected specimens of each species were weighed to the nearest gram and measured individually to the nearest millimeter (standard length); and (2) if a haul sample contained substantially more than 15 individuals of a species, then the excess specimens were enumerated in 1 cm size classes and a bulk weight was recorded. All fish specimens were examined for abnormalities such as external tumors, lesions, parasites, and skeletal deformities. EMIs were sorted to species,counted,and batch weighed. For each invertebrate species with large abundances (n>100), 100 individuals were counted and batch weighed; the remaining individuals were batch weighed and enumerated later by back calculating using the weight of the first 100 individuals. EMI specimens that could not be identified in the field were preserved in 10% buffered formalin for subsequent laboratory analysis. A-10 Methods Laboratory Methods After 3-10 days in formalin, the EMI specimens retained for further taxonomic scrutiny were rinsed with tap water and then transferred to 70% ethanol for long-term preservation. These EMIs were identified using relevant taxonomic keys and, in some cases, were compared to voucher specimens housed in the District's Taxonomy Lab. Species and common names used in this report follow those given in Page et al. (2013)and Cadien and Lovell (2016). Data Analyses Total number of species, total abundance, biomass, H', and SDI were calculated for both fishes and EMIs at each station. Fish biointegrity in the District's monitoring area was assessed using the fish response index(FRI). The FRI is a multivariate weighted-average index produced from an ordination analysis of calibrated species abundance data (Allen et al. 2001, 2006). FRI scores less than 45 are classified as reference(normal)and those greaterthan 45 are non-reference(abnormal or disturbed). The District's historical trawl EMI and fish data from the past 10 monitoring periods were also used as benchmarks. PRIMER (2001) multivariate statistical software was used to examine the spatial patterns of the fish and EMI assemblages at the Middle Shelf Zone 2 stations. The other stations were excluded from the analyses, as Clarke and Warwick(2001)advised that clustering is less useful and may be misleading where there is a strong environmental forcing, such as depth. Analyses included (1) hierarchical clustering with group-average linking based on Bray-Curtis similarity indices and similarity profile (SIMPROF) permutation tests of the clusters and (2) ordination of the same data using non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) to confirm hierarchical clustering. Prior to the calculation of the Bray-Curtis indices,the data were fourth-root transformed in order to down-weight the highly abundant species and incorporate the importance of the less common species (Clarke and Warwick 2001). Middle Shelf Zone 2 stations were grouped into the following categories to assess spatial, outfall- related patterns: "outfall" (Stations T22 and T1)and "non-outfall" (Stations T23, T12, T17, and Tll). FISH TISSUE CONTAMINANTS MONITORING Two demersal fish species, English Sole (Parophrys vetulus)and Homyhead Turbot(Pleuronichthys verticalis),were targeted for analysis of muscle and liver tissue chemistry. Muscle tissue was analyzed because contaminants may bioaccumulate in this tissue and can be transferred to higher trophic levels. Liver tissue was analyzed because it typically has higher lipid content than muscle tissue and thus bioaccumulates relatively higher concentrations of lipid-soluble contaminants that have been linked to pathological conditions as well as immunological or reproductive impairment(Arkoosh et al. 1998). Demersal fishes in the Scorpaenidae (e.g., California Scorpionfish and Vermilion Rockfish) and Serranidae (e.g., Kelp Bass and Sand Bass) were targeted, as they are frequently caught and consumed by recreational anglers. As such, contaminants in the muscle tissue of these fishes were analyzed to gauge human health risk. Field Methods The sampling objective for bioaccumulation analysis was to collect 10 individuals each of English Sole and Hornyhead Turbot at outfall (T1) and non-outfall (T11) stations during the July 2015 trawl survey. Likewise, 10 individuals in total of scorpaenid and serranid fishes were targeted at the outfall (Zone 1)and non-outfall (Zone 3) areas using hook-and-line fishing gear("rig-fishing") in September 2015 (Figure 2-3). Each fish collected for bioaccumulation analysis was weighed to the nearest gram and its standard length measured to the nearest millimeter; placed in pre-labelled, plastic, re-sealable bags; and A-11 Methods stored on wet ice in an insulated cooler. Bioaccumulation samples were subsequently transported under chain of custody protocols to the District's laboratory. Sample storage and holding times for bioaccumulation analyses followed specifications in the District's ELOM SOP (Table A-5; OCSD 2015). Laboratory Methods Individual fish were dissected in the laboratory under clean conditions. Muscle and liver tissues were analyzed for various parameters listed in Table A-6 using methods shown in Table A-5. Method blanks, analytical quality control samples (duplicates, matrix spikes, and blank spikes), and standard reference materials were prepared and analyzed with each sample batch. All reported concentrations are on a wet weight basis. Total dichlorodipheynitrichloroethane (FDDT)represents the summed values of 2,4-and 4,4'-isomers of DDD, DDE, and DDT and 4,4'-DDMU, total polychlorinated biphenyls (EPCB) represents the summed values of 44 congeners, and total chlordane(EChlordane)represents the sum of 7 derivative Table A-5 Fish tissue handling and analysis summary during 2015-16. ' = Available online at www.epa.gov; N/A= Not Applicable. Parameter Container Possessed.. Holding Time Method Arsenic and Selenium Zipll bag Freeze 6 months NS&T(NOAA 1993);EPA 200.8- ChlorinatedPesticide, Zipil bag Freeze 6months NS&T(NOAA 1993);EPA 8270- DDT. Zipil bag Freeze 6manth. NS&T(NOM 1993);EPA 8270- Lipids Zipl..W bag Freeze NIA EPA 9071' fell Zi,lack®be, Freeze 6 manth. EPA 245.6 Polychlonnatad Bipllenyls Zilock®bag Freeze 6months NS&T(NOM 1993);EPA 827V Table A-6 Parameters measured in fish tissue samples during 2015-16. ' =Analyzed only in rig- fish specimens. Marble Arsenic Mercury Selenium' Chlorinated Pesticides Chlordane Denvatives and Dielddn cis-Chlodane Diddrin clsNonschlor trans-CMoNane Heptachlor bans-NonacMor Oxychlordene Heptachlor epoxide DDT Danvetheis 2,4'-DDD(o,p=DDD) 2,4'-DDE(o,p'-DDE) 2,4'-DDT(o,p=DDT) 4,4'-DDD(p.p=DDD) 4,4'-DDE(p.p'-DDE) 4.4'-DDT(p,p=DDT) 4,4'-DDMU Polychlorinated Biphenyl(PCB)Congeners PCB 18 PCB 101 PCB 1% PCB 28 PCB 105 PCB 157 PCB 37 PCB 110 PCB 167 PCB 44 PCB 114 PCB 169 PCB 49 PCB 118 PCB 170 PCB 52 PCB 119 PCB 1T7 PCB fib PCB 123 PCB 180 PCB 70 PCB 126 PCB 183 PCB 74 PCB 128 PCB 187 PCB 77 PCB 138 PCB 189 PCB 81 PC8149 PCB 194 PCB 87 PCB 151 PCB 201 PCB 99 PCB 1531168 PCB 206 Cash,Pammetor Lipids A-12 Methods compounds (cis- and trans-chlordane, cis- and trans-nonachlor, heptachlor, heptachlor epoxide, and oxychlordane). Organic contaminant data were not lipid normalized. Data Analyses All analytes that were undetected (i.e., value below the method detection limit) are reported as not detected (ND) in Tables 2-12 and 2-13. Further, an ND value was treated as zero for calculating a mean analyte concentration; however, if fish tissue samples had all NDs for a particular analyte, then the mean analyte concentration is reported as ND. Data analysis consisted of summary statistics (i.e., means and ranges) and qualitative comparisons only. The U.S.Food and Drug Administration action levels and the State of California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment advisory tissue levels for ZDDT, EPCB, methylmercury, dieldrin and EChlordane were used to assess human health risk in rig-caught fish (Kissing and Brodberg 2008; FDA 2011). Analysis of bioaccumulation data consisted of summary statistics and qualitative comparisons only. FISH HEALTH MONITORING Assessments of the overall health (diseases and liver histopathology) of fish populations are also required by the NPDES permit. Liver histopathology analysis aims to detect tissue abnormalities (e.g., neoplasms)which can result from exposure to water column and sediment contaminants. Thus assessing the health of hepatic tissue is an effective way to assess overall fish health. Field Methods All trawl fish samples collected during the 2015-16 monitoring period were visually inspected for large, non-mobile external parasites, lesions, tumors, and other signs(e.g.,skeletal deformities)of disease. Any atypical odor and coloration of fish samples were also noted. Moreover, 40 individuals each of English Sole and Hornyhead Turbot at outfall (T1)and non-outfall (T11)stations were targeted during the July 2015 trawl survey for liver histopathology analysis. Each fish collected for histopathology analysis was weighed to the nearest gram and its standard length measured to the nearest millimeter; placed in pre-labelled, plastic, re-sealable bags; and stored on wet ice in an insulated cooler. These samples were subsequently transported under chain of custody protocols to the District's laboratory and then given to Dr. Kristy Forsgren at California State University, Fullerton for analysis. Data Analyses Analysis of fish disease data consisted of qualitative comparisons only. For histopathology protocols, see Stuart and Forsgren (2016). A-13 Methods REFERENCES Allen,L.G.,D.J. Pondella II,and M.H.Horn,Eds. 2006. The Ecology of Marine Fishes: California and Adjacent Waters. University of Califomia Press. Berkeley, CA. 660 p. Allen, M.J., R.W. Smith, and V. Raco-Rands. 2001. Development of biointegrity indices for marine demersal fish and megabenthic invertebrate assemblages of southern California. EPA grant X-989186-01- 0. Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Science and Technology, Washington, DC. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Westminster, CA. APHA (American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation). 2012. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd edition. American Public Health Association. Washington, D.C. Arkoosh,M.R.,E.Casillas,P.A.Huffman,E.R.Clemons,J.Evered,J.E.Stein,and U.Varanasi. 1998. Increased susceptibility of juvenile Chinook salmon from a contaminated estuary to Vibdo anglufflarum. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 127:360-374. Bay, S.M., D.J. Greenstein, J.A. Ranasinghe, D.W. Diehl, and A.E. Fetscher. 2009. Sediment Quality Assessment Draft Technical Support Manual. Technical Report Number 582. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Costa Mesa, CA. Cadien, D.B. and L.L. Lovell, Eds. 2016. A taxonomic listing of benthic macro- and megainvertebrates from infaunal and epifaunal monitoring and research programs in the Southern California Bight. Edition 11. The Southern California Association of Marine Invertebrate Taxonomists. Los Angeles, CA. Clarke K.R. and R.M. Warwick. 2001. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation: 2nd edition. Plymouth Marine Laboratory. Plymouth, United Kingdom. Dodder, N., K. Schiff, A. Latker, and C.L. Tang. 2016. Southern California Bight 2013 Regional Monitoring Program: IV. Sediment Chemistry. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Costa Mesa, CA. EPA(Environmental Protection Agency). 1994a. Water Quality Standards Handbook. EPA-823-B-94-005a. EPA. 1994b. Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Estuarine and Marine Amphipods. EPA 600/R-941025. FDA(Food and Drug Administration). 2011. Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance: Fourth edition. Department of Health and Human Services.468 p. Hardy, J. 1993. Phytoplankton. In: Ecology of the Southern California Bight:A Synthesis and Interpretation (M.D. Dailey, D.J. Reish, and J.W.Anderson—Eds.). University of California Press. Berkeley, CA. p. 233-265. IGODS. 2012. IGODS(Interactive Graphical Ocean Database System)Version 3 Beta 4.44[software]. Ocean Software and Environmental Consulting. Los Angeles, CA. Klasing, S. and R. Brodberg. 2008. Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels for common contaminants in California sport fish: Chlordane, DDTs, dieldrin, methylmercury, PCBs, selenium,and toxaphene. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment,California Environmental Protection Agency. 115 p. Long,E.R.and D.D.MacDonald. 1998. Recommended uses of empirically derived,sediment quality guidelines for marine and estuarine ecosystems. Human and Ecol. Risk Assess.4:1019-1039. Long, E.R., D.D. McDonald, S.L. Smith, and F.C. Calder. 1995. Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments. Environ. Manage. 19:81-97. Long, E.R., L.J. Field, and D.D. MacDonald. 1998. Predicting toxicity in marine sediments with numerical sediment quality guidelines. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17:714-727. MATLAB. 2007. MATLAB Version 7.4 [software]. The Mathworks Inc. Natick, MA. A-14 Methods Mearns,A.J. and M.J.Allen. 1978. Use of small otter trawls in coastal biological surveys. U.S. Environ. Prot. Agcy., Environ. Res. Lab. Corvallis, OR. EPA-600/3-78-083. 33 p. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 1993. Sampling and analytical methods of the National Status and Trends Program National Benthic Surveillance and Mussel Watch Projects 1984- 1992: Overview and summary of methods, Volume I. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS ORCA 71. Silver Spring, MD. OCSD (Orange County Sanitation District). 1999. Annual Report, July 1997-June 1998. Marine Monitoring. Fountain Valley, CA. OCSD. 2015. Environmental Laboratory and Ocean Monitoring Standard Operating Procedures. Fountain Valley, CA. Officer, C.B. 1976. Physical Oceanography of Estuaries and Associated Coastal Waters. John Wiley. New York. 465 p. Page, L.M., H. Espinosa-P6rez, L.T. Findley, C.R. Gilbert, R.N. Lea, N.E. Mandrak, R.L. Mayden, and J.S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico, 7th Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 34. 243 p. Plumb, R.H. 1981. Procedures for handling and chemical analysis of sediment and water samples. Tech.Rep. EPA/CE-81-1. Prepared by U.S.army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station,Vicksburg, MS. 478 p. PRIMER. 2001. PRIMER Statistical Software Package Version 6 [software]. Plymouth Marine Laboratory. Plymouth, UK. Ranasinghe, J.A., A.M. Barnett, K. Schiff, D.E. Montagne, C.A. Brantley, C. Beegan, D.B. Cadien, C. Cash, G.B. Deets, D.R. Diener,T.K. Mikel, R.W. Smith, R.G.Velarde, S.D.Watts, and S.B. Weisberg. 2007. Southern California Bight 2003 Regional Monitoring Program: III. Benthic Macrofauna. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Costa Mesa, CA, Ranasinghe,J.A., K.C.Schiff,C.A. Brantley,L.L. Lovell, D.B.Cadien,T.K. Mikel, R.G.Velarde,S. Holt,and S.C. Johnson. 2012. Southern California Bight 2008 Regional Monitoring Program:VI. Benthic Macrofauna. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Costa Mesa, CA. SEASOFT, 2016a. Seasoft CTD Data Acquisition Software, Version 7.25.0 [software]. Seabird Electronics, Inc. Bellevue, WA. SEASOFT 2016b. Seasoft CTD Data Processing Software, Version 7.25.0 [software]. Seabird Electronics, Inc. Bellevue, WA. Smith, R.W.,M.Bergen,S.B.Weisberg, D.Cadien,A.Dalkey,D. Montaigne,J.K.Stull,and R.G.Velarde. 2001. Benthic response index for assessing infaunal communities on the southern California mainland shelf. Ecol.Appl. 11:1073-1087. Stuart, J. and K.L. Forsgren. 2016. Liver histopathology of Homyhead Turbot (Pleuronichfhys verticalis) and English Sole (Parophrys vetulus) collected from reference and wastewater outfall sites in Orange County, CA in 2015. Final Report Prepared for the Orange County Sanitation District. Fountain Valley, CA. Swartz, R.C. 1978. Techniques for sampling and analyzing the marine macrobenthos. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA), Doc. EPA-600/3-78-030, EPA, Corvallis, Oregon. 27 p. SWRCB (State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency). 2009. Water Quality Control Plan for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries-Part 1 Sediment Quality. Sacramento, CA. SWRCB. 2010. Califomia Ocean Plan. Sacramento, CA. Word, J. 1978. The infaunal trophic index. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Annual Report, 1979. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Long Beach, CA. A-15 Methods Word,J.Q. 1990. The I nfaunalTrophic Index.Afunctional approach to benthic community analyses[dissertation]. University of Washington. Seattle, WA. 297 p. Zar,J.H. 1999. Biostatislical Analysis. Prentice-Hall Publishers. Upper Saddle River,NJ. 663p.+Appendices. A-16 APPENDIX B Supporting Data Table B-1 Depth-averaged total coliform bacteria (MPN/100 mQ collected in offshore waters and used for comparison with California Ocean Plan (COP) Water-Contact (REC-1) compliance criteria, July 2015 through June 2016. Meet COP Meets COP Melva COP Station Date 30.0ay Geometric Single Sample Single Sample Mean of Standard of Standard of 510001100mL 510,0001100mL 510001100ml_ 7P2312015 WWO15 BIMO15 WIZ2015 8113I2015 2f03 <10 11 <10 <10 10 YES YES YES 2104 <10 25 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2183 <10 30 <10 10 QO YES YES YES 2211 <10 Al 11 12 <10 YES YES YES 2223 <10 <10 < a 10 <10 YES YES YES 2303 < 0 Q0 <10 q0 QO YES YES YES 2351 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2403 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 101142015 10115UO15 1012ING015 111U2015 11IM015 2103 <10 <10 114 10 12 YES YES YES 2100 <10 <10 59 16 <10 YES YES YES 2183 Qp <10 142 33 11 YES YES YES 2203 <10 <10 68 12 22 YES YES YES 2223 <10 <10 157 63 16 YES YES YES 2303 <10 10 93 65 141 YES YES YES 2351 <10 28 11 72 78 YES YES YES 2403 <10 98 <10 62 21 YES YES YES 1):Ulm16 1/2112016 V=016 21912016 211012016 2103 <10 17 16 27 <10 YES YES YES 21M 17 28 21 11 10 YES YES YES 2183 <10 11 10 28 14 YES YES YES 2203 <10 10 <10 <10 10 YES YES YES 2223 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2303 <10 10 <f0 <f0 <10 YES YES YES 2351 <10 <10 10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2403 <10 <10 <10 14 <10 YES YES YES U2612016 4127MO16 WW2016 VU2016 SM12016 2103 <10 <10 17 42 11 YES YES YES 21M <10 10 46 22 <10 YES YES YES 2183 <10 <10 20 <10 14 YES YES YES 2203 <10 <10 11 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2223 Qp <10 <10 QU QO YES YES YES 2303 <10 00 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2351 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2403 12 10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES demand Is based on whan the Wage wmple nommum hpl wllerrmMW collbrm mod,0.1. B-1 Supporting Data Table B-2 Depth-averaged fecal coliform bacteria counts (MPN/100 mL) collected in offshore waters and used for comparison with California Ocean Plan (COP) Water-Contact (REC-1) compliance criteria, July 2015 through June 2016. Meets COP 30day Meets COP single Station Date Geometric Mean sample standard at 92001100m1. segon00m1. 7aU1015 Bill BrIM2015 8112I2o1S WIM015 2103 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES 2104 <10 11 q0 <f0 <f0 YES YES 2183 110 17 110 110 110 YES YES 2203 QD <10 QD <11) <10 VES YES .23 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES 2303 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES 2351 <10 <10 ap <f0 <f0 YES YES NO3 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES 1011402015 1011512015 10,29R01S 1114,2015 111A1,2015 2103 10 <10 10 QO QO YES YES 2104 <10 <10 11 <10 <10 YES YES 2183 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES 2203 <10 <10 q0 <10 <f0 VES YES .23 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES 2303 <10 <10 Q0 <10 <10 YES YES 2351 <10 HO <10 <10 <10 YES YES 2403 <10 11 <10 <10 <10 YES YES 1/2012016 1W/2016 212W16 202016 211=016 2103 <10 <10 10 <10 <10 YES YES 21M 110 12 10 <10 <10 YES YES 2183 <10 <10 <10 10 <10 YES YES 2203 <10 <10 <t1 <10 <10 YES YES 2223 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES 2303 Qp <10 Qp <10 <10 YES YES 2351 <10 <10 <10 <10 <f0 YES YES 2403 <10 <10 <10 11 <10 YES YES 412& 16 4/2112016 Sr312016 WW2016 W2016 2103 <10 <10 10 13 <10 YES YES 21N <10 <10 19 12 110 YES YES 2183 Q0 <10 10 1 0 <10 YES YES .03 <10 <10 <10 <f0 <f0 YES YES 2223 <10 e10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES 2303 <10 <10 <10 <10 <f0 YES YES 2351 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES 2403 12 QO <10 <10 <10 YES YES B-2 Supporting Data Table B- 3 Depth-averaged enterococci bacteria (MPN/100mL) collected in offshore waters and used for comparison with California Ocean Plan (COP) Water-Contact (REC-1) compliance criteria and EPA Primary Recreation Criteria in Federal Waters, July 2015 through June 2016. Meals COP Mama COP Melva EPA 3ems single sample single sample 8tatlon Date Gemeol. standard of standard of Mean of 51"100 mL 55011100 mL' 5351100 mL 7=015 61W2015 IIIt0Y2015 VIV2015 ID13@O15 2103 <10 <10 10 <f0 <10 YES YES YES 21iX e10 <10 <10 <10 e10 YES YES YES 2183 <10 <10 q0 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2203 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2223 <10 <10 <10 <10 q0 YES YES YES 2303 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2351 <10 <10 <10 <10 QO YES YES YES 2403 <10 QO q0 <10 GO YES YES YES 10/140015 1VI6I2015 1049Y2015 111442015 llIV2015 2103 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2104 <10 <10 s10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2183 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2203 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2223 <10 <10 <10 <10 q0 YES YES YES 2303 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2351 e10 < 0 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2403 <10 <10 <10 <f0 <f0 YES YES YES 11HIM016 IMM16 2=016 MU119 211=016 2103 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2104 <10 10 Qp q0 QO YES YES YES 2183 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2203 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2223 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2303 <10 <10 <10 <10 QO YES YES YES 2351 <10 <10 Qp <10 <10 YES YES YES 2403 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 4/2612016 4l12Y2016 51V2016 NW2016 NW2016 2103 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 21A <10 q0 <f0 <f0 q0 YES YES YES 21M 14 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2203 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2223 <10 <10 <11 <f0 <f0 YES YES YES 2303 <10 <10 <10 <10 Q0 YES YES YES 2351 <10 Qp <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES 2403 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 YES YES YES •6landam is eased on area mmaewent me. B-3 Supporting Data Table B-4 Summary of floatable material by station group observed during the 28-station grid water quality surveys, July 2015 through June 2016. Total number of station visits = 336. Station Gmup epcoast epcoaet Nearlleld Minin Nearfleld Downwast Downcoaet Surtace Observation Ortsnom Nearabore Olhbore ZID Nearebore ONabore Nearabore Tools 2225,2226 9293,2224 2305,2306 2303,2306 2206 2205 2203,2204 2105,2106 2103,2104 2353,23M 2351,2352 2185,2188 2183,2184 2405,2406 2403,24U Oil and Grease 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tr..l bda 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 5 Biological Matenal(kelp) 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 5 Material M Sewage Origin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 3 3 0 1 1 0 2 10 Table B-5 Summary of floatable material by station group observed during the REC-1 water quality surveys, July 2015 through June 2016. Total number of station visits = 134. Station Group Surtace Obaervaflon Upcoest Nearebore W1Nin ZID Nearfleld Dawnwast Total. Nearebore 2223,2303 2205 2203 2103,2104 2351.M03 Oil and Grease 0 0 0 0 0 TrashlDebna 0 0 0 2 2 Biological Matenal(kelp) 0 0 0 1 1 Material M Savage Origin 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 0 0 0 3 3 B-4 Supporting Data �o N____m mmmmmm mmmmmm mmmmmm c c - � NN«�N NNNNNN mmmmmm mmmmmm mmmmmm eN � u Y,!4 we $mn$ 8 RR! s" NNNNNN mmmmmm m u o mm&w;, 8mm�e8 meNem Gmg4 b R. ... . M M memm nnnnnn o00o a c � o8S6o 088� Q m0 ��OOON 000000 000000 0�000� 000000 ��00 N -�-��- NNNNNN mmmmmm mmmmom mmmnnm T � �`v3,w oam a'R,mvR$g �i,gi,�i,w R'9i. $aneNin$ inn��i S ����« NNNNNN mmmmmm nmemmm mmnnrn NNmm A N nm��ww mw m�`e,e uni`e, vnin��+, �m�mro m rvn'�ry `��n�ne`� mamm mrn o000 G 9 MO m0o�� 00 aSo noo 0000 .o mo o moo 0 Doom mmoo m mmo .Om c m $ € M __ __ NNN mmmmmm mmnnmm mmmmmm mme- a d � MNoo m��a$a �e:meR tee$<MM $m$$nm «$moo E a� od e48v; 08088 w'o N�000N m00000 000moo 000000 000000 0000 � NN---N NNNNNN mmmmmm nmmnnm mmmnnm a N� Q = d E6R�;mN �mReRr h�3S73 me�8� �S�m��, ���iam� 3 � ______ NNNNNN mmmmmm nrnmmm nnnnnn m_mm o �N�$ R�P'<Y mmmmm BRu;ffi U � ������ iyprNNiy ^����m mmmmmm nnnn omoo _T t �Am �888om m8�mm c wo NN���m o00000 000000 000000 000000 0�00 0 a � e88 mmmmm Z' E NN���N NNNNNN mmmmmm mm mmmmmm mmeN E E N«�« NNNNNN —mmm mm�mmn mm mn m N m R�.12 a. � Via. �Rs�2 g` N__oo oNmeeo �mmmN� a„„aa mm���� � oeeeeo E N fip 9 0 • E .� c �m B-5 Supporting Data . ! ;§;|;; |;]!!| !;§! •§ ! ;;M2 98>!!! !§]! •§ ; !; ..... .... . ;! !§!!.1 \�� 9 \\ � ! \j\\\\ \\\}\\ \\\\ •\ 666666 I§„ ! ]!I;!! 666666 ::,;,;;; a,[; •[ ) ;! !!f!!§ [!!!!! !;![ •[ \ !!.< •; | - ! , _„vl :==::, _ z ,l,;„ l ;.::!« . :=r= .r ) ae = ! - `® ;. i Supporting Data Table B-7 Species richness and abundance values of the major taxonomic groups collected at each depth stratum and season during the 2015-16 infauna survey. Values represent the mean and range (in parentheses). Season Parameter Stratum Annelids Mirropotla Echlnodermata Misc.Phyla Molluscs Middle Shelf Zone 1 48(3358) 18 n}22) 5(3-6) 8(4-11) 12(7-16) (31-50m) Middle Shelf Zone 2, 41 (3551) 21(16-23) 2(1-3) 5(}]) 11(9-14) Within-ZID(51-9om) Middle Shelf Zone 2, 45(2559) 18(2-25) 3(1-]) 5(0-9) 9(415) Numberof Nan-ZID(51-90m) Species Middle Shelf Zone3 (91-120m) 44(3451) 13(}22) 3(2-5) 5(3A) 12(9-16) Outer Shelf 21 (1630) 4(1-16) 2(0-4) 1(0-2) 9(5-14) (121-200m) Upper Slope/Canyon 12(S-18) 2(1-3) 1(0-2) 0(0.1) 6(2-10) (201-500m) Summer Middle Shelf Zone 1 178(92-245) 44(34-58) 18(643) 3](]-141) 21(9-30) (31-5om) Middle Shelf Zone 2, 188(132J12) 85(6}114) 3(1-6) 9(6-13) 27(20-34) Within-ZID(51-9om) Middle Shelf Zone 2, 209(55372) 58(4123) 12(1-62) ](0-19) 18(]-2]) Nan-ZID(51-90m) Abundance Middle Shelf Zone 3 170(107-219) 30(14-86) 53(12-167) 8(4-13) 43(31 b5) (91-120m) Outer Shelf 53(2]-10]) 6(1-24) 3(0-5) 2 IOa) 31(10-96) (121-200m) Upper SlopreCanyon 24(134f]) 2(1d) 1(0-2) 0(61) 15(]-25) (201-500m) Middle Shelf Zone 2, 30(2635) 16(13-20) 3(2-4) 3(1<) 6(5-9) Numberof Within-ZID(51AOm) Species Middle Shelf Zone 2, Non-ZID(51-90m) 39(2452) 15(11-20) 4(1-7) 4(14) 7(1-12) 144nter Middle Shelf Zone 2, 67(54-94) 31(19-3]) 8(5-12) 3(1<) 14(5-28) Within-ZID(51AOm) Abundance Middle Shelf Zone 2, 121(63-211) 29(1648) 8(2-28) 511-12) 11(2-23) Non-ZID(51-90m) B-7 Supporting Data ( ..........,_° \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ` - \ co / � E > . .. . . . . . . . ` ; rE , = !2 \ . . . / , , .. . . . . E ) °\°,\.,. \ \ § , . . 1. . \ ) { ° t � • , Q JQ/ I / \s, J sgElb\ MAI ©© Rx Hffl m Hi\ \4\) u I A JAI \\\\\ Supporting Data Xo T ¢'^mrmom.w'mrmrvrv---'----------- N � � . ,, ^ 2 x _ mm eeeeeeee v v v v v v v v v e ¢«_eooeoee0000 e o e oe o o o00o c F N ry ^ e e a e e O1 �_ ro NJ w y m M 10 C F N u F m 3 n ~ $ w e e o0 0 0 0 w w E o e eo ee ee m w m o ee e e ee e e _„ w a : o000 D o e oe q C w N oeo 0 o eo 0 00 0 w T O M8v 8 e 9 H 8 8 8 y e ee m m w 8 o 88 8 8 ^ m e e e Em w E Fj w '�'• 8 G o w w � _ 8 8 0 888 8 88 i O F P m 8 88 8 88 w o e0 e o � N a E - E46 E _ E C O a s m N D 'pi d y y O -q`a � `mmcg '°^ E ° i 20 a ° aS c''caW- q? '8 .� de � y.a ��XFW iqq;� omS-gI m-Y` Em F EEs,@ A 2ry �. �.M3abc c�F �i cn q ml,ffil n"rcy�s f No'$m�aa°--ro-n' 8�u8¢oso' Snu B-9 Supporting Data ------------------------- F � N o00 Es N 3 � � m N 3 F N 3 r 6 0 0 y ; o N 3 m N F n N C F n N o N � n N c 000a o0 0 ooa o F n N Doo a o0 d E E .0 o x m99 m s _ i _ x @nEymWo�n�oE ° `o o � u a a $°� =; W@4agwtaa "`sm��� m8 "�= m eG$24 qa = dam ~ [IOWLL��22�¢Q¢U[lO�W22LL�KNN> B-10 Supporting Data x g���emN------ mmmmmmmmmm ^�aNN_ . ..m m mmmmmemN� m $M^BmmNm em88 � NmN 3 N 3 4m 18 N < TT - - � � m m m € $ O j N N ~ m N f0 m � N � a N w L N m N N - E _ F ro m m m d -o s o m gexc.� gmc gEF ,` y c� %umS A Sic a'Bc EmSy$Rc@m$ Ea ?E mc � g� aq F UNNN m3LLt3S 1tL kce U' LLQ�SNN � ul — M-M B-11 Supporting Data T u�en""������ 000000000o yyyyyyyy �AmQ1 °$0 0p P � _ �nannn"nn"«< o0 0000 00000 �U off M oEe 3a o $ N J � �i % P� $oo o ��o o�o o�oa000 00 N o 0 0 0 00 0 0 N 3 m o0 00 0 0 0 0 0 a o0 0 00 0 0 0 m S ms a �"d N QQao ogao 0 000 0 ~ m n 6666 6 O6 6 6 � a 0 0 0 E E 3mnee �8 -o 0 0 0 f � � mono 000 0 0 0 oa o o0 000 00 6 6 6 0 Iv ss 3 00 000 00 0 00 0 os. �g m s ss 00 00 o_ o00 0 0 0 nNe o � s 00 00 E - o0 n N S m9e e8 y o 0 E E in y z IN "�c£c � oe Z>cyy� v� ac ommy • wnim `@ 6WNNy�SSyZ22�X�N�'S N4aN�LL��U'��NNNbQLL B-12 Supporting Data m m eemmmm m eMNNNN N� MNMNNM M NNN �� , gggg gggggggg gggg gg ggggpgggg gg �_ a 088�8888ommr�=88 8mmm88�88�N�,m m�mem8 O ,� ,� gogmo ggo ggggmoog C o - n A A A A A A A A A A A A A w n A ry o ^ < s mMMmMmMemMrvrv-rv__N-ry rv-rv�NrvNFAr o c y d c � vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv F f0 N tp S m nnnn v m m v"E��--�e w E w o ! vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv O pc a a'^$MduSw m`e,�v'Ain nrvmm f'SB'Bi,wNnNaNNrvrv��om w y6s f rvmmrvrvmrvmme��mm�m«mm ________mrsm mm�mmm `o 0 t N N � i vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv � O c N d c wo m mmmmeee mmrvm «� N�Q�N��m,'SN Fmm�em�'m"dim U a omm m o 0 om=mmm .R ry M ` m�mA w m R n n A d = �v � mMmm<'.9�6'e�«iy iy�e��� rvrvNrvrvrvrvNMN���rv«��iy m C o, @ N c c 4 o f vvvv � vvvvvvvvvvvv � v vvvv � vv � vvvv � vvvvv o 9 N y 0 Nd m m mmn �� NNNrvMMary a mMaamm m NNNN N r J m rorvm m ry NN SAAAAAAAAAA Fssgsasoo88ssssssss� jLL m f m.�nmmmenne---rv�---- ----rvrv-----�«�«� U U N ivvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv F mmn�u�iN�Wnmmmm.....< J PnzzNNzbnmmmm...... F � O MMNN LL MM N B-13 Supporting Data �IVJ 4MdMMdMMd�mMNMNNNN � ��8mm8�88�8NN8„Nm�8 a Y mmmm�nm � mmmmmmery s �`- �CtlCC�'C�CC�'C C�CtlCCC at no NrvvNrvrvNrvvrvrv���rv�m� N nA m m"�mAmA°IN�2m2 mA pj � MddMdNMdNNNNNNNNMN '[�. VVVvvVvvvvVvvVVVvv N NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN� M uaMd dMMMdd&eMIN- 4 � m��u��N cminn�gcNdi�V�rv�NMg E �v�vv�vNv v'mvv�v�vvv NO mmemevemm m mNmmmm N . � �m�'mm�mx��mr?mem�mF m � wnn � MMMMMMMM f VVVV vv v . VVVV vVVVVv N NrvNNrvNNNNrvNNNNrvNN� _ i mAmemm6Mm�3e���M�mm wo dgd MMMMgd adgmNNNMNNMM ymmm Nmvm C O t r V V VVV V V v m v _d C a x e wMNNzzzma�,�mwM�n�cwima F allE M W B-14 Supporting Data J E a8 m"B0M66 N <ma� "M"NN`°reM "g d O m m m rv � _ C Coen„ m ........... =8`s= ��m� oocemo o�^oCBrmw�R�AM A A 8-A °u f0 < F __ mrvrvry m m m m A8m8m�e8RR8mR&n« rpp U m d a = �88�8 8 r88^88rr�r8^r8��h��rmrrg^m a s vvvvvv � 'm vvvrvv Vvvvvvv m V F .0 mm A U O _ d m o 0 0 0 -o s" rmm v m m m `A' ��AmmmA� mA m `o svvv " vv " v v v v " vvC�V " vvvvvvv v w$ mumi�n 9n''na$'n m a n ama`'^�n^mry rvrvrvrv� n ui m m 08 0 - w = gg r.rr ^8V N vvvvvvv v v v v vvvvi(vv�v`� vv v C O m ac mmrmmmr m m r w ammam�mm�am � m N � 'O 8888mm8 g gmmo8gm8mm8mm 8mrm 8 O m @C� R , A A A A ,, m m A mmArmm8m8A«" 8mA aCN S ��� rvrvm m m m u4 mm v���mm"�mNrvm�m U � rry ry m VLAr8Vmrr^ 0 9 a v vvvv v v v v vvv ^V vvV vLG' O N N Lm nmav nm m m m m nmmnnrvan mine 'A v K AA88„88888�8m878888888�88�88�8m88m8�8 $� m m � . .. > mm' mA E m ry m m mm8�'m mm C8�< r E N Ua = pp88^88^ 8^88rg ^^r^=^ 8r^^^r^mr a v vvvv �RVmAVm� „� vv I v . vv A v M `o M. o o � 00�0 y a $$�..y d m i m m i mmim�immim a ai<'LL'w`LLzo�.01od a m 000000.- sz s� ss �s sm m ma a333:Ozm w� F F w B-15 Sup _ _ !! !§!!=E§ ! § § ! !§!!§!§!!§!!!!!I §! , ! ))l;l:r;!!;§!r)!§!;!!!))§§!!|!!;li•)l==-) \ ! , . , _ , l,=',2,t2 _; 2 - ::_!!_;)_!!_!l;=;==;_<;___II.IIo'. $ !! ! B z ! l; l-Bi-;;7 ,. ! . ;-7!s= _ � � . . . � : ; ;_;_;__ _ ; _ _ ;_;_;_ __1=;;,; _! !! §§,,,., . . . .., . , :1 _______ _ _ _ _ _______`____;;l= _! !,!`�,_ ! , , , „ ,!:!!!_;•_°°! ; ____;;_ ; ; _ ; _;;__;_;_;__;_l===;! § ! ))!;,!!!!!!!,r(!;!l,tr !!;!>,;« _) 7E E ! ,=�.=r; ; ; ; ; ,,;.;»;l=VEV;to; _! - ;!)_§!;!l=;;=;;;t=;===_!_ ;` 2 ! ) ,!:!!!::_::_ 13-16 Supporting Data Z-4M A^�A^A^A A`°��A a „__ mdm r m m m mm ry rM - M f CCCCCCCmC� CAgCCmCCCC�CCeCCCCCC Cm CC »s' dNdrv_�� N N N � rvMNrv�m ry d�MrvN� � £ rv__ rvrvm m ry M ry mrM ry N - m CCCCCCN v v v v CCCC�C CCCCCC�C CC Y mA o�Nm NS2MrAmm8R?mfAR'o m$ m0 rvMNNMMd d M d M dddMNm��rvN �Nrv�m N R 'A$°A$'Am'X��mAA mCdCCCC C N v v CCNC<CmNCC9CCCmC CC 8 > mAm »e" dMmmMmM d M m m NmnNm �NNN dmMm N 717 7m«7-7�17m�A7 R_ a CCNCCCC C v v v CCCCMCC�CCRCCCCm�CC mAn NO m4NmMdm 4 m d m mmdm�mONNN�NNm d 88�m„;o8m�mgm g gd 8mmoNm8 A 88;8mm 8mrvm 8o E ^ mM� mmm m m m r mnmx �mMM�MNra C C ` v vvvv m t9N C�CC$CC'r CCCdrC v o s CAMCACAAC 2v--A- � v - - M m m ' yySSS�mm�d=m°N'vm°c'+m°'dmnmo�y a 10.'V'(�V mUV LLtmJ^m'uo�mop_ f9 00NN 0V0x00x 00x 0A.A 2 gym 0pdyu3 ZO�OF�FQ m e0000mx xx xx xx xi im m ma a3 3os s F � 0 wmw w` B-17 This page intentionally left blank. APPENDIX C Quality Assurance/Quality Control This appendix details quality assurance/quality control information for the collection and analyses of water quality, sediment geochemistry, fish tissue chemistry, benthic infauna, and trawl fish and invertebrate samples for the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) 2015-16 ocean monitoring program. INTRODUCTION The Core monitoring program is designed to measure compliance with permit conditions and for temporal and spatial trend analysis. The program includes measurements of: • Water quality; • Sediment quality; • Benthic infaunal community health; • Fish and macroinvertebrate community health; • Fish tissue contaminant concentrations (chemical body burden); and • Fish health (including external parasites and diseases). The Core monitoring program complies with the District's Quality Assurance Project Plan (CAPP) (OCSD 2015a) requirements and applicable federal, state, local, and contract requirements. The objectives of the quality assurance program are as follows: • Scientific data generated will be of sufficient quality to stand up to scientific and legal scrutiny. • Data will be gathered or developed in accordance with procedures appropriate for the intended use of the data. • Data will be of known and acceptable precision, accuracy, representativeness, completeness, and comparability as required by the program. The various aspects of the program are conducted on a schedule that varies weekly, monthly, quarterly, semi-annually, and annually. Sampling and data analyses are designated by quarters 1 through 4, which are representative of the summer (July—September), fall (October—December), winter(January—March), and spring (April—June) seasons, respectively. WATER QUALITY NARRATIVE Ammonium Introduction The District's Environmental Laboratory and Ocean Monitoring (ELOM)staff collected 737, 751, 654, and 654 discrete ammonium samples during the quarterly collections beginning July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2016. All samples were iced upon collection, preserved with 1:1 sulfuric acid upon C-1 Quality Assurance/Quality Control receipt by the ELOM laboratory staff, and stored at 4±2 °C until analysis according to laboratory Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs, OCSD 2015b). Analytical Method -Ammonium The samples were analyzed for ammonium on a segmented flow analyzer using Standard Methods 4500-NH3 G. In the analysis, sodium phenolate and sodium hypochlorite reacted with ammonium to form indophenol blue in a concentration proportional to the ammonium concentration in the sample. The blue color was intensified with sodium nitroprusside and was measured at 660 nm. QA/QC -Ammonium A typical sample batch included a blank at a maximum of every 20 samples, an external reference standard, and a spike in seawater collected from a control site at a maximum of every 20 of samples. One spike and spike replicate was added to the batch every 10 samples. The method detection limits (MDLs)for ammonium samples using the segmented flow instrument is presented in Table C-1. QA/ QC summary data are presented in Table C-2. All samples were analyzed within the required holding time. All analyses met the QA/QC criteria for blanks,blank spikes,external reference standards, matrix spikes and matrix spike replicates as shown in Table C-2. One precision measurement for matrix spike and matrix spike replicate was out of control for fourth quarter samples due to instrumentation malfunction. Table C-1 Method detection limit (MDL) for ammonium and bacteria in receiving water, July 2015—June 2016. Parameter MDL Ammonium 0.0162 nri Total collfolm 10 MPNI100mL E.coli 10 MPNIt00mL Entemcocci 10 MPNI100mL 'ne,eWhing limit for ammonium is 0020 milli Wlues between the MDL aM the RL wne estimated. Bacteria Introduction All bacteria samples were iced upon collection and stored at <10 °C until analysis following ELOM SOPS. Analytical Method Samples collected offshore were analyzed for bacteria using EnterolertTMt for enterococci and Colilert-18T"I for total coliforms and Escherichia coli. Fecal coliforms were estimated by multiplying the Escherichia coli result by a factor of 1.1. These methods utilize enzyme substrates that produce, upon hydrolyzation, a fluorescent signal when viewed under long-wavelength (365 nm) ultraviolet light. For samples collected along the surfzone, samples were analyzed by culture-based methods for direct count of bacteria. EPA Method 1600 was applied to enumerate enterococci bacteria. For enumeration of total and fecal coliforms, respectively, Standards Methods 9222B and 9222D were used. MDLs for bacteria are presented in Table C-1. QA/QC All samples were analyzed within the required holding time. Recreational (REC-1) samples were processed and incubated within 8 hours of sample collection. Duplicate analyses were performed on a minimum of 10% of samples with at least one sample per sample batch. All equipment, reagents, and dilution waters used for sample analyses were sterilized before use. Sterility of sample bottles C-2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Table C-2 Water quality ammonium CA/QC summary, July 2015—June 2016. auarter Total No.of Samples UAIQC Sample Type Number Tested Number of % Compounds (Total No.of Batches) Compounds Tested passed• Blank 40 1 100 Blank Spike 40 1 100 Summer 737(10) Mori 76 1 100 Matrix Spike Duplicate 76 1 100 Matrix Spike Precision 76 1 100 Blank 42 1 100 Blank Spike 42 1 100 Fall 751(11) Matrix Spike 78 1 100 Matrix Spike Duplicate 78 1 100 Matrix Spike Precision 78 1 100 Blank 37 1 100 Blank Spike 38 1 100 Winter 65 (8) Mahix Spike 70 1 100 Matrix Spike Duplicate 70 1 100 Means Spike Precision 90 1 100 Blank 37 1 100 Blank Spike 37 1 100 Spring 656(8) Mam Spike 69 1 100 Matrix Spike Duplicate 69 1 100 Matrix Spike Precision 69 1 99 •M anebia Pa.it Me bliwrtne cater.was met For Wank-Tame(arurecy%remvery< MOL, For Wank Spike-Terms Skesser%Si 90-110. Far reare Spike-Timet eccum,%.very 00-120. For mark spike surmises-Teryet exurery%m000ery e6120. For maOia spike pecisbn-Ta,s.precision%RPD�11St. was tested for each new lot/batch before use. Each lot of medium, whether prepared or purchased, was tested for sterility and performance with known positive and negative controls prior to use. For surfzone samples, a positive and a negative control were run simultaneously with each batch of sample for each type of media used to ensure performance. New lots of Quanti-Tray and petri dish were checked for sterility before use. Each Quanti-Tray sealer was checked monthly by addition of Gram stain dye to 100 mL of water, and the tray was sealed and subsequently checked for leaking. Each lot of dilution blanks commercially purchased was checked for appropriate volume and sterility. New lots of s10 mL volume pipettes were checked for accuracy by weighing volume delivery on a calibrated top loading scale. SEDIMENT CHEMISTRY NARRATIVE Semi-Annual Collections (July 2015 and January 2016) Introduction The District's ELOM laboratory received 68 sediment samples from ELOM's ocean monitoring staff during July 2015, and 29 samples during January 2016. All samples were stored according to ELOM SOPS. All samples were analyzed for organochlorine pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyl congeners (PCBs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), trace metals, mercury, dissolved sulfides (DS), total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and grain size. All samples were analyzed within the required holding times. Analytical Methods— PAHs PCBs and Organochlorine Pesticides The analytical methods used to detect PAHs, organochlorine pesticides, and PCBs in the samples are described in the ELOM SOPS. All sediment samples were extracted using an accelerated solvent extractor(ASE). Approximately 10 g(dry weight)of sample were used for each analysis. A reparatory funnel extraction was performed using 100 mL of sample when field and rinse blanks were included in the batch. All sediment extracts were analyzed by GC/MS. Atypical sample batch included 20 field samples with required quality control (QC)samples. Sample batches that were analyzed for PAHs, organochlorine pesticides, and PCBs included the following C-3 Quality Assurance/Quality Control QC samples: 1 sand blank, 1 blank spike, 1 standard reference material (SRM), 1 matrix spike set, and 1 sample extraction duplicate. Method detection limits (MDLs)for PAHs are presented in Table C-3. Acceptance criteria for the PAH SRM are presented in Table C-4. Sediment PAH QA/QC summary data are presented in Table C-5. MDLs for PCBs/pesticides are presented in Table C-3. Acceptance criteria for the PCBs/pesticide SRM are presented in Table C-6. Sediment PCBs/pesticide QA/QC summary data are presented in Table C-7. All analyses were performed within holding times and with appropriate quality control measures, as stated in the District's CAPP. When constituent concentrations exceeded the calibration range of the instrument, dilutions were performed and the samples reanalyzed. Any deviation from standard protocol that occurred during sample preparation or analyses are noted in the raw data packages. Table C-3 Method detection limit (MDL) for PAH, chlorinated pesticide, and PCB constituents in sediments, July 2015-June 2016. Parameter (rig/9 wet wel9hl) Pammeter (n919 wet weight) PAH Compounds Acenaphlhene 0.4 Fluomnthene 0.4 Acenaphthylene 0.4 Fluomne 04 Anthracene 0.3 Indeno[1,2,3 ,d]pymne 0.3 Berida]anthracene 0.2 Naphlhalene 1.1 Benzo[a]pymne 0.2 Perylene 0.6 Benza[b]fluommbene 0.4 Phenanthrene 0.8 Be.[e]pyrene 0.4 Pyrene 0.2 Benzo[g,h,i]peMene 0.4 1-MethylnapMhalene 0.5 Benzo[k]nuoranftne 0.5 2-Methylnephthelene 0.9 Biphenyl 0.8 2,8-Dimethylnaphthalene 0.4 Chrysene 0.3 1,6,7-TrimetbNnspMbalene 0.4 Dlbenz[a.h]anthmcene 02 2.3,8-TrlmenlylnaphOalene 0.5 Dibenzothicphene 0.3 1-Methylphenamhmne 0.5 Chkdnated P.aftdes Aldrin 0.42 Hexachlarabenzene on cis-Chlordane 1.29 Mimx 0.70 trans-ChloMane In "nsNonachlor 1.48 Dieldrin 2.00 2,4'-DDD 2.18 Endosulhnalpha 1.54 4,4'-DDD 1.47 Endosulfan-beta 2.00 2,4'-0DE 1.51 Endosulfan-sulfate 0.94 4p'-0DE 1.75 Endnn 3.52 2,4'-DDT 1.m gamma-BHC 2.64 4,4'-DDT 0.56 Heptachlor 2.01 4,4'-DDMU 2.16 Heptachlor epoxde 1.10 PCB Congeners PCB 18 020 PCB 126 0.21 PCB 28 0.14 PCB 128 0.31 PCB 37 040 PCB in 0.19 PCB44 0.17 PCB 149 0.17 PCB49 0.39 PCB 151 0.16 PCB 52 0.20 PCB 1531168 0.79 PCB 66 0.31 PCB 1% 0.20 PCB 70 0.30 PCB 157 0.15 PCB 74 0.24 PCB 167 0.19 PCB 77 0.15 PCB 169 0.11 PCB 81 0.17 PCB 170 0.11 PCB 87 0.26 PCB 177 0.15 PCB 99 0.18 PCB 180 0.17 PCB 101 0.19 PCB 183 0.18 PCB 105 0.17 PCB 187 0.14 PCB0 0.18 PCB 89 0.13 PCB 114 0 PCB 9 013 PCB 118 0.16 PCB 201 0.19 PCB fl9 0.20 PCB 206 0.17 PC6123 0.14 C-4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Table C-4 Acceptance criteria for standard reference material SRM 1944 (New York/New Jersey Waterway Sediment, National Institute of Standards and Technology)for PAH constituents in sediments, July 2015—June 2016. ' = Non-certified value used for this parameter. Acceptance Range(nglg) Parameter True Value hi Minimum Maximum Acenaphglene 390 234 SW Antimatter.- 1130 678 1582 Bram[a]anihrecene 47M 2832 6600 Benzo]a]pyrene 4300 2580 .0 Bmuc[b]80orenmene 3870 23U Still Benzo]e]pyrene 3280 1958 4592 Banzo[g,h.9perylane 28t0 1704 3976 Benm]kruomethene 2300 two 3220 Biphenyl' 250 150 350 Chesser. 4860 2916 681 D is nz[a,h]anihrecene 424 254.4 593.6 Dibenzolhlophene' 500 300 700 Fluoranthene 8920 5352 124BB Fluorene' 480 288 672 Indmm[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene 2780 1666 U92 Naphthalene' 12M 760 1792 Perylene 1170 702 1638 Phenanthrene 5270 3162 7378 Pyrene 9700 W20 13580 1-Mathyinap11halena' 470 282 658 2-Methyinaphtheiene' 740 444 1036 1-Methyiphenanlhmne' 17M 1020 2380 Percent Dry Weight 1.3 - - Table C,5 Sediment LPAHs QA/QC summary, July 2015—June 2016. Quarter Total No.of Samples QVW Semple Type Number Teebd Number of %Compounds (Total No.of Batches) Compaunde Tested Pa...d' Step 4 26 94 Blank Spike 4 26 94 Matrix Spike 4 26 100 Summer 68(4) Matrix Spike Duplicate 4 26 100 Matrix Spike Precision 4 26 100 Duplicate 5 26 78 SRMAnalysis 6 24 87 Blank 3 26 99 Blank Spike 4 26 87 Matrix Spike 2 26 100 Winter 29(3) Matrix Spike Duplicate 2 26 100 Matrix Spike Precision 2 26 94 Duplicate 2 26 83 SRMAnalyeis 2 21 93 'M grohnse pa.9 Me following caftan.won met For dank-Target em,racy%rewvery<U MDL. For dank spike-Target ecareq%rewyery 60-120, For Tons spike-Target acaracy%rewvary 40-120. For mere spike duplicate-Target axumcy%recovery 4e-120. For more spike pscisio..Target precision%RP)<39%. For duplicate-Target precision%Fri %at 3x MDL N sample mean. For sRM walynlg-Target accuracy%recovery 80-140%or relined velue ar ichever is greeter. Analytical Methods -Trace Metals Dried sediment samples were analyzed for trace metals in accordance with methods in the ELOM SOPS. A typical sample batch for silver, cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, lead, zinc, selenium, arsenic, and beryllium analyses included 3 blanks, a blank spike, and 1 SRM. Additionally, sample duplicates, sample spikes, and sample spike duplicates were analyzed a minimum of once every 10 sediment samples. QC for a typical sample batch for aluminum and iron analyses included 3 blanks, an SRM, field sample duplicates, sample spikes, and sample spike duplicates analyzed a minimum of once every 10 sediment samples. The analysis of the blank spike and SRM provided a measure of the accuracy of the analysis. The analysis of the sample, its duplicate, and the 2 sample spikes were evaluated for precision. The samples that were spiked with aluminum and iron were not evaluated C-5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Table C-6 Acceptance criteria for standard reference material SRM 1944 (New York/New Jersey Waterway Sediment, National Institute of Standards and Technology) for chlorinated pesticide and PCB constituents in sediments, July 2015-June 2016. ' = Non-certified value used for this parameter. Parameter True Value Acceptance Range(ill (ri Minimum Maximum ChbMeted Postcodes co-Chlordane 16.5 9.9 23.1 beta-Chlordim 19.0 114 26.6 gamma-BHC• 2.0 Hexachlorobenzene 6.0 3.6 8.4 clsNonachlor' 3.7 2.2 5.2 trabi onschior 8.2 4.9 11.5 2AlIDDD 38.0 22.8 53.2 4,4'-DDD' 101 64.8 151.2 2,4'-DDE' 19.0 11A 26.6 4,4'-DDE' 85.0 51.6 120A 4,4'-DDT• 170.0 102.0 238A PCB Coryeners PCB 18 51.0 30.6 71A PCB 28 80.8 48.5 113.1 PC844 60.2 36.1 84.3 PCB 49 0.0 31.8 74.2 PCB 52 79.4 47.6 111.2 PCB 66 71.9 43.1 1011 PCB 87 29.9 17.9 41.9 PCB 99 37.5 22.5 52.5 PCB 101 73.4 44.0 102.8 PCB 105 24.5 14.7 34.3 PCs 110 63.5 38.1 88.9 PCB 118 58.0 US 81.2 PCB 128 8.5 5.1 119 PCB 138 62.1 37.3 86A PCB 149 49.7 29.8 69A PCB 151 16.9 10.2 23.7 PCB 1531168 74.0 44.4 103.6 PCB 156 6.5 3.9 9.1 PCB 170 22.6 13.6 31.8 PCB 180 44.3 26.6 62.0 PCB 183 12.2 7.3 17.1 PCB 187 25.1 15.1 35A PCB 194 111 6.7 15,7 PCB 206 9.2 5.5 12.9 Odle, Percent Dry Weight 1.3 - - Table C-7 Sediment 7PCB and 7Pesticides QA/QC summary, July 201"une 2016. Quarter Total No.of samples "QC Sample Type Number Tea[etl Numberof %Compounds (Total No.aBatches) Compounds Tested Passed' Blank 4 60 100 Blank Spike 4 60 91 Matrix Spike 4 60 92 Summer 68(4) Matrix Spike ogplmete 4 60 91 Matrix Spike Precision 4 60 76 Duplicate 4 60 100 SRM Analysis 4 33 62 Blank 3 60 100 Blank Spike 3 60 86 Matrix Spike 2 fia 88 Winter 29(3) Matrix Spike Duplicate 2 60 84 Matrix Spike Precision 2 60 96 Duplic le 2 60 100 SRM Analysis 2 33 88 'An mail pasaid if the rdlwly Plans rereel: For slack-Target accurery%recovery<3X MDL. For blank spec-Tar amureny%mnvery 90.1H1. Far marnx spike-Tergar aaunry%recovery 46120. For main spike rest care-Trans acaary%recovery 40-120. For matrix spl a precision-Tral precision It For<30%. Far duplicab-Target produce%RPD 130%ar 3X MDL of serape maan. For SRM anaryns-Targel accuracy%recovery f l40%or cenifietl xalue,whicMrm is greala. C-6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control for spike recoveries because the spike levels were extremely low compared to the Concentrations of aluminum and iron in the native samples. The samples were spiked at 20 mg/kg dry weight whereas the native concentrations ranged between 5,000 and 35,000 mg/kg dry weight. All samples were analyzed within a 6-month holding time. If any analyte exceeded both the appropriate calibration curve and Linear Dynamic Range, the sample was diluted and reanalyzed. MDLs for metals are presented in Table C-8. Acceptance criteria for trace metal SRMs are presented in Table C-9. The digested samples were analyzed for silver, cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, lead, zinc, selenium, arsenic, and beryllium by inductively coupled mass spectroscopy(ICPMS). Aluminum and iron were analyzed using inductively coupled emission spectroscopy (ICPES). Sediment trace metal QA/QC summary data are presented in Table C-10. Analytical Methods - Mercury Dried sediment samples were analyzed for mercury in accordance with methods described in the ELOM SOPS. QC for a typical batch included a blank, blank spike, and SRM. Sediment sample duplicates, sample spike, and spike duplicates were run approximately once every 10 sediment samples. When sample mercury concentration exceeded the appropriate calibration curve, the sample was diluted with the reagent blank and reanalyzed. The samples were analyzed for mercury on a Perkin Elmer FIMS 400 system. The MDL for sediment mercury is presented in Table C-8. Acceptance criteria for mercury SRM is presented in Table C-9. All QA/QC summary data are presented in Table C-10. All samples,with some noted exceptions,met the QA/QC criteria guidelines for accuracy and precision. Analytical Methods - Dissolved Sulfides Dissolved sulfides (DS)samples were analyzed in accordance with methods described in the ELOM SOPs. The MDLfor DS is presented in Table C-11. Sediment DS QA/QC summary data are presented in Table C-12. All analyses met the QA/QC criteria for blanks, blank spikes, matrix spike, matrix spike duplicates, and matrix spike precisions. Most sample duplicates did not pass the precision criterion (<30%p)due to low DS content in the sediment samples. Table C-8 Method detection limit (MDL)for trace metals in sediments, July 2015—June 2016. Parameter MDL (mglkg dW weight) Aluminum 50 Antimony 0.1 Arsenic 0.15 Barium 0.1 Beryllium 0.01 Cadmium 0.01 Chromium 0.15 Copper 0.1 Iron 50 Leer! 0.1 Memury 0.000 Nickel 0.1 Selenium 0.15 Silver 0.02 Zinc 0.15 C-7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Table C-9 Acceptance criteria for standard reference material Priority PollutnTTM /CLP Inorganic Soils— Microwave Digestion (Environmental Resource Associates)for trace metals in sediments, July 2015—June 2016. True Value Consul Acceptance Cril jimik9) Parameter (arks Min. Mu. Aluminum 9510 41W 14800 AnSmony 72.9 18.7 206 Arsenic 161 114 209 Barium 385 286 404 Berylllum 146 110 182 Cadmium 149 110 191 Chromium 180 127 233 Copper 182 122 207 Iran 13000 42M 21800 Lead 103 73 132 Mercury 3.73 1.9 5.55 Nickel 133 97.4 172 Selenium 153 103 202 Silver 71A 47.8 US Zinc 352 2511 450 Table C-10 Sediment metals QA/QC summary, July 2015-,tune 2016. Total No.of Samples Number Number of % Quarter (Total No.of Bitches) Parameter OAIDC Sample type Tested Compounds Compounds Tested Passed 68(4) Aluminum,Iron Blank 8 2 100 CRM 2 2 100 Blank 4 1 100 Blank Spike 4 1 100 Matrix Spike T 1 100 68(2) Mercury Manx Spike Dup ] 1 100 Matrix Spike precision T 1 100 Summer Duplicate Analyss ] 1 100 CRM Ann,,. 2 1 100 Blank 8 12 100 Arsenic,Berylllum, Blank Spike 4 12 100 Cadmium,Chromium, Matrix Spike T 12 06 68(4) Copper,Lead,Nickel, Manx Spike Dup ] 12 75 Selenium,Silver,Zinc, Matrix Spike Precision ] 12 100 SINec Barium Duplicate Analysis T 12 100 CRM Analyses 2 12 100 38(2) Aluminum,lron Blank 0 2 100 CRM 2 2 100 Blank 2 1 100 Blank Spike 2 1 100 Matrix Spike 4 1 100 30(2) Mercury Manx Spike Dup 4 1 100 Matrix Spike Precision 4 1 100 Winter Duplicate Analysis 4 1 100 CRMAnaNsls 1 1 100 Blank 4 12 100 Arsenio Beryllium, Blank Spike 2 12 100 Cadmium,Chromium, Matrix Spike 4 12 92 38(2) Copper Lead,Nickel, Manx Spike Dup 4 12 92 Selenium,Silver,Zinc, Matrix Spike Precision 4 12 100 Sliver.Barium Duplicate Analysis 4 12 100 CRM Analysis 1 12 100 'An woussus wasol d In.fdlown,Wle,la were met: For blank-Total aaurecy%recovery k3X Ml For blank spke-Tamer a—.,%re—,90-110. For mabir aoike-Time)aauracy%remvery 1a1]0 For mains Spike dollwle-First reason%Min 120, For dupllI-Tager peal%RPD 30. For SRM analyse-Tager accuracy%remvary W-120%aroeNOeE value whichever Is greet¢,. Analytical Methods-Total Organic Carbon Total Organic Carbon (TOC) samples were analyzed by ALS Environmental Services, Kelso, WA. The MDL for TOC is presented in Table C-11. Sediment TOC QA/QC summary data are presented in C-8 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Table C-11 Method detection limit (MDL) for dissolved sulfides, total organic carbon, grain size, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus in sediments, July 2015-June 2016. Paramsbr MDL Dissolved Sulfides(01 1.03 mgft dry weight Total Orgill lc Carbon(ALS Environmental) 0.10% Grain Size(EMSI-Matytical) 0.001% Total Ninagen(Week Labs) 60 al dry Total Phosphorus(Week Labs) 3 7 mi dry Table C-12 Sediment dissolved sulfides QA/QC summary, July 2015-June 2016. N/A = Not Applicable. Number of Quarter Total No.of Samples QA/QCSample Type Number Tested Compounds %Campeuntle (Total No.of Batches) Tested passed Blank T 1 100 Blank Spike T 1 100 Matrix Spike Y 1 100 Summer 68(9) Matrix Spike Duplicate T 1 100 Matrix Spike Precision T 1 100 Duplicate T 1 43 SRM Analysis NIA NIA N/A Blank 3 1 100 Blank3pike 3 1 100 Matrix Spike 3 1 100 Winter 29(3) Matrix Spike Duplicate 3 1 100 Matrix Spike Precision 3 1 100 Duplicate 3 1 0 SRM Analysis NIA NIA NIA •M enalnla papa N d a tolla.er,cmeda—met For bank-Taget eauracy%uni Q%MDL. For dank spike-Taget acwnry%nwrery 00-120, For metal spike-Trust acarary%remvary T6130. For metal Spike duarm-Target accusal%asomey]6130. For marks spike precison-Target precision%RPD<b%. For cuplicalk-Tame precision%RPD 30%. Table C-13 Sediment total organic carbon QA/QC summary, July 2015-June 2016. Total No.of Senni Number of %compounds Quarter (Tool No.otBatches) Gul Sample Type Number Tested Compounds psse ad• Testa Blank 6 1 100 Blank3pike 10 1 To Mal Spike 5 1 W0 Summer SO(5) Work,Spike Duplicate 5 1 11D Matrix Spike Predator 5 1 WO Duplicate 6 1 100 SRM Analyss 10 1 100 Blank 2 1W Blank3pike 2 1 100 Matrix Spike 2 1 To Winter 29(2) Matrix Spike Duplicate 2 1 100 Matrix Spike Precision 2 1 100 Duplicate 4 1 1w SRM Analysis 2 1 100 'M enalysi5 pass ids it Me bllaring crime vrere mat For blank-Teryet eaa i%rewwry Q%MDL. For Gank Spike-Tom.asu %re.,80-120, For...Spike-To,N acwrery%remvery 96120. For mark Spike tluparste-Ta gin aaurery%rerovery M120. For users spike peciebn-Target precision%RPD 110%. For duplipse-Tail precision%Fall,10%. For SRM analpls-Time accunq%recovery 80120%or s unal value whlrem,Is greeter. C-9 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Table C-13. All analyzed TOC samples passed the QA/QC criteria. Analytical Methods- Grain Size Grain size samples were analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Cinnaminson, NJ. The MDL for sediment grain size is presented in Table C-11. Sediment grain size QA/QC summary data are presented in Table C-14. Seven samples and their duplicate analyses had a RPD!00%. Thirty replicates of station 12 samples were analyzed as grain size standard reference material (SRM) and all analysis results Table C-14 Sediment grain size QA/QC summary, July 2015—June 2016. N/A= Not Applicable. Total No.of Samples Number of %Compountls Quarter (Total No.o/Batches) "QC Sample Type Number Tested Compounds pass<tl' Tested Blank NIA NIA NIA Blank Spike NIA NIA NIA Matrix Spike NIA NIA NIA Summer BS(T) Matrix Spike Duplicate NIA NIA NIA Matrix Spike Precision NIA NIA NIA Duplicate ] 1 100 SRMAnalysis 30 1 100 Blank NIA NIA NIA Blank Spike NIA NIA NIA Matrix Spike NIA NIA NIA Winter 29(4) Matrix Spike Duplicate NIA NIA NIA Matrix Spike Precision NIA NIA NIA Duplicate 3 1 100 sRmmaysls NIA NIA NIA an.,.,Is Pa.Ir Pe bloating.Mere were met Ford icata-Target predalm%RPD d0v, For SRM analysis-Mean x 30 of the relerenue standard far median pM,skewness,diapmsim.%parer.%seer,%use and%sill. were within 3 standard deviations of SRM for the statistical parameters (median phi, dispersion, and skewness), percent gravel, percent sand, percent clay, and percent silt. Analytical Methods-Total Nitrogen Total nitrogen (TN) samples were analyzed by Weck Laboratories, Inc., City of Industry, CA. The MDL for TN is presented in Table C-11. Sediment TN CA/QC summary data are presented in Table C-15. The matrix spikes and their duplicate analyses had a RPD of less than 30%. The associated Table C-15 Sediment total nitrogen CA/QC summary, July 2015-,tune 2016. Total No.of Samples Number 0y,Compountls Quarter (Total No.of Batches) "QC Sample Type Number Tested Compounds pempou Tested Blank 5 1 Blank Spike 5 1 i0o00 Manx Spike 7 1 43 Summer 88(3) Matrix Spike Duplicate T 1 72 Matrix Spike Precision T 1 100 Duplicate 7 1 100 SRMMelyels 5 1 100 Blank 2 1 100 Blank Spike 2 1 100 Matrix Spike 3 1 100 Winter 29(1) Matrix Spike Duplicate 3 1 100 Mums Spike Precision 3 1 100 Duplicate 2 1 100 SRMAnalysis 2 1 100 'An...this p eard 0Me adverse'arso,—a mrt For dank-Target a¢urary%amvery 12x MDL. For dank spike-Te.N....%recovery B612D. For mole area-Target accuracy%recovery 70130, For mn xspoke dulVlwb-Target axuacy%xovery]6130. For maElx spMe yeabbn-Tager pSbbn%Ron c30%. For dispel-Target precisim%RPDd . For SRM analysis-Tamer acauaq%awvery 80-120%or rcTfied value wnenever is greater C-10 Quality Assurance/Quality Control laboratory control sample (LCS) met acceptance criteria; however, only 29% and 43% of matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates, respectively, met the recovery criteria of 70-130% range due to matrix interferences in the analysis. Analytical Methods -Total Phosphorus Total phosphorus (TP)samples were analyzed by Weck Laboratories. The MDL for TP is presented in Table C-11. Sediment TP QA/QC summary data are presented in Table C-16. Seven samples and their duplicate analyses had a RPD of less than 30%. The associated LCS met acceptance criteria; however, 2 sample spikes and 3 spike duplicates did not meet target recoveries of 70-130% range Table C-16 Sediment total phosphorus QA/QC summary, July 2015—June 2016. Total No.of Samples Number of %Compountls Quarter (Tool No.o/Bahhes) WQC Sample Typo Number raised Compounds Testes passed* Blank 4 1 100 Blank3pike 4 1 100 pi Spike 7 1 29 Summer 68(2) Matrix Spike Duplicate 7 1 43 Matrix Spike Precision 7 1 IN Duplicate 7 1 1W SRM Analwis 4 1 100 Blank 2 1 100 Blank Spike 2 1 1110 Matrix Spike 3 1 33 Winter 29(1) Mahix Spike Duplicate 3 1 33 Matnx Spike Precision 3 1 100 Duplicate 3 1 10D SRM Analysis 2 1 WO `M anal pawed it me kill cause were met For Mank-Target a¢u recy%..,2%MDL. Form ank spike-Targeta scary%recovery 80-120. Formatrix alike-Tagerecmrery%remveryT cusp For maker spike tlus iqb-Terser actuary%recovery 76130. For matrixspike k ison-Target RPD Iar%RPD<30%. For Smalcek-Terger Terse alss%RPO c30X. For SRM analysis-Targelacaary X ncovary 00-120%wcoined valuawl,'cl,rver is greatear, due to matrix interferences. FISH TISSUE CHEMISTRY NARRATIVE First Quarter (July 2015) Introduction The District's ELOM laboratory received 20 individual rig-fish samples and 27 individual trawl fish samples from ELOM's ocean monitoring staff during the month of July 2015. The individual samples were stored, dissected, and homogenized according to methods described in the ELOM's SOPS. A 1:1 muscle to water ratio was used for muscle samples. No water was used for liver samples. After the individual samples were homogenized, equal aliquots of muscle from each rig-fish sample, and equal aliquots of muscle and liver from each trawl fish sample were frozen and distributed to the metals and organic chemistry sections of the analytical chemistry laboratory for analyses. In addition to the percent lipid content determination, the organic chemistry section extracted 20 rig- fish muscle samples, 27 trawl fish muscle tissue samples, and 27 trawl fish liver tissue samples, and analyzed them for PCB congeners and organochlorine pesticides. C-11 Quality Assurance/Quality Control A typical organic tissue sample batch included 15 field samples with required QC samples. The QC samples included 1 hydromatrix blank, 2 sample duplicates, 1 matrix spike, 1 matrix spike duplicate, 1 SRM, and 1 reporting level spike (matrix of choice was tilapia). For mercury analysis, 1 sample batch consisted of 15-20 fish tissue samples and the required QC samples, which included a blank, blank spike, SRM, sample duplicates, matrix spikes, and matrix spike duplicates. For arsenic and selenium, 1 batch consisted of 15-20 fish tissue samples and the required QC samples, which included 3 blanks, a blank spike, SRM, sample duplicates, matrix spikes, and matrix spike duplicates. Analytical Methods- Omanochlorine Pesticides and PCB Congeners The analytical methods used for organochlorine pesticides and PCB congeners were according to methods described in the ELOM SOPS. All fish tissue was extracted using an ASE 350 and analyzed by GUMS. The MDLs for pesticides and PCBs in fish tissue are presented in Table C-17. Acceptance criteria for PCBs and pesticides SRM in fish tissue are presented in Table C-18. Fish tissue pesticide and PCB QA/QC summary data are presented in Table C-19. All analyses were performed within the required holding times and with appropriate quality control measures. In cases where constituent concentrations exceeded the calibration range of the instrument, the samples were diluted and reanalyzed. Any deviation from standard protocol that occurred during sample preparation or analyses are noted in the raw data packages. Table C-17 Method detection limit (MDL) for chlorinated pesticide and PCB constituents in fish tissue, DSQ II, July 2015-June 2016. * = Reporting limit used for this parameter. MDL Penmeter (a9t9 d.ight) Parameter 1n9/9 not ight) Chbdnatad Pesdckes us-Chlordane 0.33 2,4'-DDD 0.33 M1dosChloNane 0.25 4,4'-DDD 0.16 Ox,hbrdane 1.000 2,4'-DDE 0.23 Dieldrin 0.31 4,4'-DDE 0.31 Heptachlor 0.23 2.4'-DDT 0.33 Heptachlor epoxide 0.37 4,1'-DDT 0.24 cis-NonecMor 0.19 4,4'-DDMU 0.43 Imns-Nonachlor 0.21 PCB Congeners PCB 18 0.24 PCB 126 0.11 PCs 28 0.21 PCB 128 0.08 PCs 37 027 PCB 138 0.16 PCB" 0.3' PCB 149 0.33 PLB 49 0.17 PCB 151 0.22 PCB 52 0.17 PCB 153I168 0.23 PCB fib 0.26 PCB 1% 0.10 PCB 70 0.23 PCB 157 0.10 PCs 74 0.24 PC61fi7 0.09 PCB 77 0.21 PCB 169 0.15 PCB 81 0.19 PCB 170 0.18 PCs 87 0.17 PCB 177 0.09 PLB 99 0.44 PCB 180 0.1a PCB 101 0.14 PCB 183 0.13 PCB 105 0.13 PCB 187 0.06 PCB 110 0.19 18 PCB 9 0.12 PCB 114 0.10 PCB 194 0.17 PCB 118 0.22 PCB 201 0.20 PCB 119 0.14 PCB 206 0.11 PCB 123 0.21 C-12 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Table C-18 Acceptance criteria for standard reference material SRM 1946 (Lake Superior Fish Tissue; National Institute of Standards and Technology) for lipid and chlorinated pesticides and PCB constituents in fish tissue, July 2015-June 2016. ' Non-certified value used for this parameter. Acceptance Range(irl Personal True Value(rul Minimum Maximum Cblonnafed Peaticidea cle hlordae` 32.5 30.7 34.3 Mans-Chlordane 8.36 7.45 9.27 Oxychlordane 18.9 17A 20.4 Dieldno 32.5 29.0 36.0 Neplachlor epoxide 5.50 5.27 5.73 ae-Nonachlor 59.1 55.5 62.7 tours-Nonachlor 99.6 92.0 107 2,4'-0DD 230 1.95 245 44'-DDD 17] 14.9 20.5 2.4'-DDE 1.04 0]5 1.33 4A'-DDE 373 325 421 2,4'-DDT' 22.3 19.1 25.5 4A'-DDT 37.2 33.7 40.7 PCB Congeners PCB 18' 0." 0.73 0.95 PCB 28' 2.00 1.76 2.24 PCB 44 4.66 3.80 5.52 PCB 49 Its, 3AI 4.19 PCB 52 8.1 7.1 9.1 PCB 66 10.8 8.9 12.7 PCB 70 14.9 14.3 15.5 PCB 74 4.83 4.32 5.M PCB)] 0327 0.30 0,35 PCB 07 9.4 8.0 10.8 PCB 99 256 233 27.9 PCB 101 34.6 32.0 37.2 PCB 105 19.9 19.0 MS PCB 110 22.8 20.8 24.8 PCB 118 52.1 51.1 53.1 PCB 126 0.380 0.36 0.40 PCB 128 22.8 20.9 24.7 PCB 138 115 102 128 PCB 149 26.3 25.0 27.6 PCB 15N168 170 161 129 PCB 156 9.52 9.01 10.0 PCB 170 252 23.0 274 PCB 180 74.4 70.A 78.4 PCB 183 219 19A 244 PCB 187 55.2 53.1 57.3 PCB 1M 13.0 11.7 14.3 PCB 201' 2.83 2.70 2.96 PCB 206 5.40 4.97 5.83 OMer Lipid' 10.17 - - Table C-19 Fish EPCBs and EPesticides QA/QC summary, July 2015-June 2016. Number of Quarter Total No.of Samples OA=Sample Type Number Tested Compounds YCampauntle (total No.of SeelTested Passed' Blank 10 54 100 Blank Spike 5 54 89 Matrix Spike 5 54 90 Summer 74(5) Moons Spike Dup 5 54 90 Matrix Spike Predsion 5 54 96 Duplicate 10 54 96 CRM Mail 5 41 78 •M aralisla paeastl it Me hallowing criteria were mac For Wank-Mike muses,%rawvery<3X ell For Wank Spike-Target scene,%recovery 801211. Farmaso mike-Taryeracarecy%recovery4b12t. For More spike suplose-1rgeleccumry%recovery40-120. For mark spike precision Targetpxikbn%RPD20%. Fordupleale-Targetpralslon%RPD< %ar3XMDLdmmplemean. For Soles analple-T,,u acmrery%recovery 60-140 or eenMed value,wM1lMevp is greabr. C-13 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Analytical Methods- Lipid Content Lipids were extracted by dichloromethane from approximately 1 to 2 g of sample and concentrated to 2 mL. A 100 pL aliquot of the extract was placed in a tarred aluminum weighing boat and allowed to evaporate to dryness. The remaining residue was weighed, and the percent lipid content calculated. Lipid content QA/QC summary data are presented in Table C-20. All analyses were performed within the required holding times and with appropriate quality control measures. Any deviation from standard protocol that occurred during sample preparation or analyses are noted in the raw data packages. Table C-20 Fish tissue percent lipid CA/QC summary, July 2015—June 2016. Number of Number of Target Sample Set Tissue Type Parameter Description Compounds Compounds Preelsion% rowed Pass" RPD FISH-EXUPJUL IS MV Musde Percent Lipid Duplicate Samples 2 2 <2514 FISH-EXLIPJULI5-LS Liver Percent Lipid Duplicate Samples 2 2 Q5% FISH-F UPJULi SLT Liver Percent Lipid Duplicate Samples 2 1 <25% FISH-EXLIPJULI5 MU Musde Percent Lipid Duplicate Samples 2 2 <2514 FISH-EXLIPJULI5 MW Musde Percent Lipid Duplicate Samples 2 2 <25% Analytical Methods- Mercury Fish tissue samples were analyzed for mercury in accordance with ELOM SOP 245.1A. Typical QC analyses for a tissue sample batch included a blank, a blank spike, and SRMs (liver and muscle). In the same batch, additional QC samples included duplicate analyses of the sample, spiked samples, and duplicate spiked samples, which were run approximately once every 10 samples. The MDL for fish mercury is presented in Table C-21 Acceptance criteria for the mercury SRMs are presented in Table C-22. Fish tissue mercury QA/QC summary data are presented in Table C-23. All samples were analyzed within a 6-month holding time and met the QA criteria guidelines. Pretreated (resected and 1:1 Muscle: water homogenized) fish samples were analyzed for mercury in accordance with methods described in the ELOM SOPS. QC for a typical batch included a blank, a blank spike, and an SRM (whole fish). Fish samples with duplicates, spiked samples, and duplicate spiked samples were run approximately once every 10 fish samples. When sample mercury Table C-21 Method detection limit (MDL) and reporting limit (RL) for metals in fish tissue, July 2015—June 2016. Panmater MDL lmglkg) RL(mgfkg) Arsenic 0.002 0.015 Mercury 0.001 0.004 Selenium 0.001 001 Table C-22 Acceptance criteria for standard reference material Fish Protein Certified Reference Material(National Research Council Canada DORM-3)for metals in fish muscle tissue, July 2015—June 2016. ParamaNr True Value(mglkg) CerlMed Acceptance Criteria(mgarg) Min. Max. Mani. 6.88 5.0 7.18 Selenium' 3.3 - - Mercury 0.382 0.322 0.442 Confled min,and ma,,,values vas nut calwbb4 due to eaXMng&mutts 4 fM manufacturer. C-14 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Table C-23 Fish tissue mercury, arsenic, and selenium QA/QC summary, July 2015—June 2016. TOtel No.of Samples Number of %Compounds Quarter (Total No.of Bashes) Tested Opli Sample Type Number Tested Compounds pampou Testetl ssed Blank 4 1 100 Blank Spike 4 1 100 Matrix Spike 8 1 100 Summer 74(4) Mercury Mum,Spike Dup 8 1 100 Ma1tlx Spike Predsim 8 1 100 Duplicate 8 1 100 SRM Analysis 2 1 100 Blank 3 2 100 Blank Spike 1 2 100 Amenic and MaM%Spike 2 2 100 Summer 1(20) Matrix Spike Dup 2 2 100 Selenium Matrix Spike Pmklsion 2 2 100 Duplicate 2 2 100 SRM Analysis 1 2 100 An s a yes issues 9Ne folloxing wtlena wm me: Fardank-Te.M ecmmry%rea,IV MDL. For dank spike-Tmgatack ary%xovery 90-110, For masix spike-Tmgel acwrery%n k—,70-130. For marox Spike duosale-Tery et pttkbn ke RPD e29. For dismiss-Tary&peclslm%RPD 30, For SRM analysis-Target awurary%recovery MI20%w amoral value whidiever is gnale.. concentration exceeded the appropriate calibration curve, the sample was diluted with the reagent blank and reanalyzed. The samples were analyzed for mercury on a Perkin Elmer FIMS 400 system. All samples met the CA criteria guidelines for accuracy and precision. Analytical Methods -Arsenic and Selenium Fish tissue samples were analyzed for arsenic and selenium in accordance with ELOM SOP 200.86. A typical QC analyses for a tissue sample batch included 3 blanks, a blank spike, and SRMs (liver and muscle). In the same batch, additional QC samples included duplicate analyses of the sample, spiked samples and duplicate spiked samples which were run approximately once every 10 samples. The MDLs for fish arsenic and selenium are presented in Table C-21. Acceptance criteria for the arsenic and selenium SRMs are presented in Table C-22. Fish tissue arsenic and selenium QA/QC summary data are presented in Table C-23. All samples were analyzed within a 6-month holding time and met the QA criteria guidelines. Pretreated (resected and 1:1 Muscle: water homogenized) fish samples were analyzed for arsenic and selenium in accordance with methods described in the ELOM SOPS. The samples were analyzed for Arsenic and Selenium on a Perkin Elmer ELAN 6100 system. All samples met the QA criteria guidelines for accuracy and precision. BENTHIC INFAUNA NARRATIVE Sorting and Taxonomy QA/QC The sorting and taxonomy QA/QC follows the District's CAPP. These QA/QC procedures were conducted on sediment samples collected for infaunal community analysis in July 2015 (summer) from 29 semi-annual stations (52-65 m) and 39 annual stations (40-300 m), and in January 2016 (winter)from the same 29 semi-annual stations, for a total of 97 samples for the year (see Appendix A). A single sample was collected at each station for infauna. Sorting QA/QC Procedures The sorting procedure involved removal, by Marine Taxonomic Services, Inc. (NITS), of organisms including their fragments from sediment samples into separate vials by major taxa. The abundance C-15 Quality Assurance/Quality Control of countable organisms(heads only)per station was recorded. After MTS'in-house sorting efficiency criteria were met, the organisms and remaining particulates (grunge) were returned to the District. Ten percent of these samples (10 of 97)were randomly selected for re-sorting by District staff. Atally was made of any countable organisms missed by MTS. A sample passed QC if the total number of countable animals found in the re-sort was<-5% of the total number of individuals originally reported. 2015-16 Sorting CA/QC Results Sorting results for all QA samples were well below the 5% QC limit. Taxonomic Identification QA/QC Procedures Benthic infauna samples underwent comparative taxonomic analysis by 2 independent taxonomists. Samples were randomly chosen for re-identification from each taxonomist's allotment of assigned samples. These were swapped between taxonomists with the same expertise in the major taxa. The resulting data sets were compared and a discrepancy report generated. The participating taxonomists reconciled the discrepancies. Necessary corrections to taxon names or abundances were made to the database. The results were scored and errors tallied by station. Percent errors were calculated using the equations below: Equation 1. %Error#Tax, = [(#Taxa R„o,r„d- #Taxa anginal) +#Taxa Readr,j x 100 Equation 2. %Error#mdwid-IN= [(# Individuals Reno,„d -# Individuals Dr�gin.)+# Individuals .-.d,x100 Equation 3. %Error#,D Taxa = (#Taxa Mi.d..ficad,a+#Taxa R-..) x100 Equation 4. %Error#,D IMiM-is= (# Individuals M„M,n.-son +# Individuals R-1.) x100 Please refer to the District's QAPP for detailed explanation of the variables. The first 3 equations are considered gauges of errors in accounting (e.g., recording on wrong line, miscounting, etc.), which, by their random nature, are difficult to predict. Equation 4 (Eq. 4) is the preferred measure of identification accuracy. It is weighted by abundance and has a more rigorous set of corrective actions (e.g., additional taxonomic training)when errors exceed 10%. In addition to the re-identifications, a synoptic data review was conducted upon completion of all data entry and CA. This consisted of a review of the infauna data for the survey year, aggregated by taxonomist (including both in-house and contractor). From this, any possible anomalous species reports, such as species reported outside its known depth range and possible data entry errors,were flagged. Table C-24 Percent error rates calculated for July 2015 CA samples. station ErmrType Mean C W 70 1.%E.,,. 6.9 5.8 6.8 6.5 2.%Erta__ 14 0.2 0,7 0.8 3.%E..._ 4.0 10.0 7.8 7.2 4.%E....,„ . 1.2 5.8 2.4 3.1 C-16 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 2015-16 Taxonomic QA/QC Results QC objectives for identification accuracy (Eq. 4) were met in 2015-16 (Table C-24). No significant changes to the 2015-16 infauna dataset were made following the synoptic data review. OTTER TRAWL NARRATIVE The District's trawl sampling protocols are based upon regionally developed sampling methods (Mearns and Stubs 1974, Mearns and Allen 1978) and US Environmental Protection Agency 301(h) guidance documents (Tetra Tech 1986). These methods require that a portion of the trawl track must pass within a 100-m circle centered on the nominal sample station position and be within 10% of the station's nominal depth. In addition, the speed of the trawl should range from 0.77 to 1.0 m/s (1.5 to 2.0 kts). Since 1985, the District has trawled a set distance of 450 m (the distance that the net is on the bottom collecting fish and invertebrates). This contrasts with previous regional trawl surveys which factored in time on the bottom, not distance. Station locations and trawling speeds and paths were determined using Global Positioning System navigation. Trawl depths were determined using a Sea-Bird Electronics SBE 39 pressure sensor attached to one of the trawl boards. For Summer 2015, trawl distances averaged 449 m and average trawl speed was 1.9 kts (Table C-25). All of the trawls passed through the designated 100-meter circle(Figure C-1)except at Station T23,and all trawls were within t10%of the nominal station depth(Figure C-2). For Winter 2016,trawl distances averaged 459 m and average trawl speed was 2.0 kts (Table C-25). All the trawls passed through the designated 100-meter circle (Figure C-3), and all trawls were within f10%of the nominal station depth (Figure C-4). C-17 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Table C-25 Trawl track distances and vessel speed for sampling conducted in Summer 2015 and Winter 2016. Vessel speeds outside of the QA range of 1.5-2.0 knots are denoted with a t symbol. season Station Messe.T coded(m) vessel speed(Ids) T1 457.1 1.9 T2 402 2.0 T6 455.0 2 3 t T 391.1 1.7 T110 1 463.2 2 4 t T12 453.3 1.3t T14 454.9 2.0 summer T17 457.1 1.5 T18 457.9 2.21 T19 457.1 1.9 T22 455.1 1.5 T23 453.4 i.T T24 408.4 1.8 us 460.4 1.a Mean 449.1 1.9 T1 456.7 2.0 T11 4%8 1.8 T12 4%.1 2.11 W'mter T17 449.9 2.0 T22 459.5 1.9 T23 483.0 2.1t Mean 459.3 2.0 C-18 Quality Assurance/Quality Control C 0 z — - - W a 0 � I 1 � N C v c 0 w � y N N i L 9 A m W M � U _ N E o_ m 9w W g E c 0 d n N L H 1 `� IV I '' • W I N �i � �s o rn aQ � a c c m m Imp J L` o W w H rn m LL C-19 Quality Assurance/Quality Control m n J J N r a N i ww aa'Ivww N 5 N J J f N J r F N o y R O w ° 3 a 5 L f { 9 v R N O 3 r }O � @ C � y O _ N +I . � N i U i ro a v e v aiwo ° ° v v�.iwoa v e e LL " ° °iwwwv e z ° s °i.iwmoa C-20 Quality Assurance/Quality Control T1 T11 End / `� \ sun \\\ End 1 • I � \ I 1 scan End T12 T17 — ` End 1 � 1 • 1 I \ \ � I • I scan T22 T23 slap I End I I 1 1 End N I Figure C-3 Quality assurance plots of otter trawl paths in relation to a 100-m circle (red dashes) surrounding each nominal station position, January and March 2016. C-21 Quality Assurance/Quality Control T1 T11 EN Ef0 5sa 5e ao a T12 T17 Em gZ� T22 T23 8 m 8 m `s `s d d Tr.w Damxoo rymuua) naw Dm.mo rymuw) T.1 De --- Nominal — U,p Limtl — LmmrLimil Figure C-4 Quality assurance plots of trawl depth per haul for otter trawl stations, January and March 2016. Upper and lower limit lines are ±10% of nominal trawl depth C-22 Quality Assurance/Quality Control REFERENCES Mearns,A.J. and M.J.Allen. 1978. The use of small otter trawls in coastal biological surveys. Rep. No. 600/3- 78-083. US Environmental Protection Agency. Corvallis, OR. 34 p. Mearns,A.J. and H.H. Stubbs. 1974. Comparison of otter trawls used in southern California coastal surveys. TM 213. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. El Segundo, CA. 15 p. Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). 2015a. Orange County Sanitation District — Ocean Monitoring Program. Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP), (2015-16). Fountain Valley, CA. OCSD. 2015b. Environmental Laboratory and Ocean Monitoring Standard Operating Procedures. Fountain Valley, CA. Tetra Tech. 1986. Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)for 301(h) monitoring programs: Guidance on Field and Laboratory Methods. EPA Contract No. 68-01-6938. TC-3953-04. Final Report. May 1986. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. 267 p. +Appendices. C-23 This page intentionally left blank. APPENDIX D Fish Tissue Addendum In September 2016, the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) laboratory staff discovered an error in percent lipid calculations for Hornyhead Turbot and English Sole samples collected by trawling between January 2009 and March 2013, which affected the lipid-normalized FDDT and EPCB tissue data.As such,fish tissue FDDT and EPCB values were subsequently recalculated using the corrected lipid values to verify the accuracy of the District's bioaccumulation conclusions during this time period. Nearly all recalculated means were similar to or considerably lower than the corresponding initial means (Tables D-1 to D-5). Thus, the final conclusions with regard to fish tissue bioaccumulation for those reporting years (2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, and 2012-13) remain accurate. Table D-1 Initial and corrected FDDT and ZPCB values in muscle and liver tissues of selected flatfishes collected by trawling in January 2009 at Stations T1 (outfall) and T11 (non- outfall). sp.dea Initial Comecled Inlnal Conceded (Common Nam.) Tissue Station n ZDDT ZDDT ZPCB ZPCB (Pglkg) 1,11,g) (P911,g) (P91kg) Nonoutlall 10 276 87.3 113 45.8 (66.2-1160) (0-220.9) (0-266) (0.2506) Muscle Ougall 10 134 29.6 28 5.8 R'eumnkhthys (]6]-269) (0-134.4) (18443.3) (0-17.2) eRlcelis (NomyheaA TUNd) Non-outlall 10 312 1995 252 23.4 (05.2-12-1030) (85.2-1029.7) (0.4-2314) (8.449 A) Liver Outlall 10 203 202.E 43.6 43.6 (8].94.9-052) (07.9451.9) (7.9-96.8) (7.9-96.8) Nonouttall 10 115 5].5 7.3 3.7 (49.6-188) (24.8-93.8) (0-11.6) (0-5.8) Muscle 588 213.5 74.4 28.0 P.Whrys veNlus Outlall 10 (4.24570) (0-1582.8) (0-556) (M92.2) (English Bole) 296 296.1 66.9 66.9 Nonougell 10 Liver (953-629) (95.8-628.6) (9.8-199) (9.8-199.1) Outlall 10 205 30.6 30.6 (39-974) (39.0-97.0-9]3.5) (8A-104) (8.4-10103.fi) D-1 Fish Tissue Addendum Table D-2 Initial and corrected EDDT and EPCB values in muscle and liver tissues of selected flatfishes collected by trawling in July 2009 at Stations T1 (outfall)and T11 (non-outfall). Species Will Correctil InlNal Cerrectsl (Common Name) Tissue Swish n MDT MDT EPCB EPCB (N*g) (Irelae) Magi) (paltre) Non-oudell 2 65.6 17.9 11.1 4.6 Muscle (11.4-211) (0-35.7) (Cl (09.1) Pleuronichm, Oulfall 10 74 32 21 9.2 verticelis (25.1163) (0-82.1) (1.436.9) (0-28.4) (Hornyhead TuN ) Non-oulall 2 78.4 158.1 7.8 32.1 (1].8-20]) (109.3-207) (0.25.9) (12.451.0) Liver Ougall 10 58.3 58.3 23.5 23.5 (16.8-156) (16.8-155.9) (8.257.9) (8.245.5) Non-outlall 6 273 81.8 33.3 12.6 (50.1506) (28.7-181.3) (7.7-117) (3.8-23.9) Muscle 148 85.1 96.8 28.8 Perophrys vehhus Oullell 10 (27390) (13&219.1) (2.9300) (11204.1) (English Sole) 1237 150.4 78.9 17.6 Non-ougall 6 (87-8622) (273785) (0387) (044.5) Liver Oulfell 10 fi1 414 292 (15]-1448) (0.21219) (35-2438) (0.172.9) Table D-3 Initial and corrected EDDT and EPCB values in muscle and liver tissues of selected flatfishes collected by trawling in January 2011 at Stations T1 (outfall) and T11 (non- outfall). Species InTal Corrected lnitlal Correll (Common Name) Tissue Station n MDT MDT EPOS EPCB (pelkel (pgfkg) (pWkg) (pgD9) Non-outlall 5 20 54.6 0.4 0.36 (4.2-85) (16A-91.8) (0-3.6) (0.1.8) Wilde Pleuronich1h, Ouffel 5 (3.6.1 (0107 ND ND ver(Icalls (Hornyhead Tunnot) Nonoutlall 5 SSE 126.9 3 5 Liver (20.5-216) (68.8-215.9) (0-15.5) (0-15.5) Ou6all 5 49.3 62.3 7.2 12.9 (18.3-n.8) (52A-64.2) (0-27) (6-12.3) Nonou6all 5 104 83.0 6.5 5.2 (232-365) (0-1838) (0-52) (0-26) Musde 232 78.6 18.7 4.6 Perophrys vetulus Outtall 5 (28."91) (14.2-141.5) (042.1) (0.22.8) (English Sole) 68.9 72 8.6 14.5 LivNonouHall 5 (189-130) (21A-1115) (0.8-83.1) (2.5-63.1) er Ou6all 5 .7 74.2 3.2 (51 J-136) (51.]-103.3) (0-38-38.8) (0.15.7) D-2 Fish Tissue Addendum Table D-4 Initial and corrected FDDT and EPCB values in muscle and liver tissues of selected flatrishes collected by trawling in August 2011 at Stations T1 (outfall) and T11 (non- outfall). Note: the initial data did not include ranges. Species legal Connected IniBal Corrected (Common Name) Tlasue Station in £DDT £DDT VPCe Vice (pgikg) Ipglk9) (pggrg) (ggikg) Non-outfall 1 74.9 91.4 15 US Muscle 61.9 2.1 PleuronicMbys Outten 10 27.6 (0.288A) 2.9 (048.9) venicalis (Homyhead Turbot) Non-outlall 1 70.3 21 3.6 2.4 over Oudall 10 76.5 (47.9134.2) 23.1 (4.9-104.8) Non-oudall 10 99.9 (29]'52) 7.3 (03964) Muscle 5.7 PampCrys v.Wcc Oulfall 10 We 16.6(1 83.1) 11.4 (020.9) (English Sole) Non-oudall 10 44.fi 101 10.2 Liver (1].141-01].8) (2.8-0fi.9) Oudall 10 51.7 51.] 14.8 14.6 (15A-96.8) (3.8-2fi.4) Table D-5 Initial and corrected EDDT and LPCB values in muscle and liver tissues of selected flatfishes collected by trawling in March 2013 at Stations T1 (outfall) and T11 (non- outfall). Species Initial Connected lnelai Conneced (Common Name) Tisane Slogan in EDDT EDDT EPCB EPCB (pglkg) (geikg) (pWkg) (pWkg) Nonougell 10 14.] 31.8 0.5 0.24 (0-03.8) (0-11]]) (0-3.8) (0-1.88) Muscle Pleummc5f8ys Ougall 10 8.27 13 1.9 2.14 (0-27.5) (0-36.3) (0-13.3) (0-61) vadcalis (Homynead Turbot) Nonoudall 10 119 118.6 8.3 8.3 (17.1-355) (17.1-355.5) (0-26.1) (0-26.1) Li er Oudall 10 67.5 87.5 8.3 8.3 (43.2-122) (43.2-121.8) (1.5-18.7) (1.5-18]) Nonougall 10 563 299 US 11.3 (148-1635) (0-017.6) (0-103) (0-51.3) Muscle Ougall 10 102.2 WA Y21 18.4 Pamph,s vahilus (1.15389) (0.6-27/) (0-141) (0-70.3) (English Sole) 290 2899 ] ] Nonougell 10 (12.8-1104) (12.8-1103.8) (2A2d9.2) (2A-79.2) er Oudall 10 191 11 32.9 32.9 (27 423) (2]-34-341.3) (0-10105) (0.109.2) D-3 This page intentionally left blank. Y 9� ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Environmental Lab and Ocean Monitoring Division 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 714.962.2411 www.ocsewers.com 3/16