Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout98.05-23-2018 Board Meeting Item 08 Attachment 1 - Biosolids Annual Report.pdf Orange County Sanitation Distt iosolids MIanagement Compliance Report �-E�P,A�- 40 C,�FR Part�503 or i Y This page intentionally left blank Serving` Orange County Sanitation District Anaheim 10844 Ellis Avenue,Fountain Valley,CA 92708 714.962.2411 • www.ocsdxom Brea Buena Park Cypress Fountain Valley February 7, 2018 Fullerton Hope Smythe, Executive Officer Darden Grove California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region 3737 Main Street, Suite 500 Huntington Beach Riverside, CA 92501-3348 Irvine SUBJECT: Orange County Sanitation District's Annual Compliance Report La Habra La Palma Enclosed please find the Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) Biosolids Los Alamitos Management Compliance Report as required under the 40 CFR Part 503 regulations, Arizona Administrative Code Article 10, and the National Pollution Newport Beach Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. CA0110604, Order No. R8- 2012-0035. Orange OCSD has uploaded this report into EPA's biosolids electronic reporting database, Placentia and submitted e-mail copies to state and local regulators. A copy of OCSD's EPA Santa Ana electronic report is included as Appendix D. Seal Beach Certification Statement The following certifications satisfy procedural requirements as listed in section Stanton V.B.5 of the Orange County Sanitation District's NPDES Permit No. CA0110604 Tustin and 40 CFR part 503, section 503.17 for the submittal of the attached compliance report for calendar year 2017. Villa Park NPDES permit:I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments County of Orange were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information Costa Mesa submitted. Based on m inquiry of the person or Sanitary District Y 4 ry Pe persons who manage the system, or the persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted Midway City is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,accurate, and complete. I am aware Sanitary District that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the Irvine Ranch possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Water District Yorba Linda Water District Our Mission: To protect public health and the environment by providing effective wastewater collection, treatment, and recycling. hlN SeNyN!/O O� 4 •O � +4 IN Y If you have any questions or comments regarding this packet of information or require any additional data, please contact Deirdre Bingman at(714)593-7459. 1 can be reached at (714) 593-7508. Ronald Coss Laboratory, Monitoring, and Compliance Manager RC/DEB:bg IYII�Yb1bmSdgbe'ftVlmpliarve`SosrtEs'6mqunm PepsleWnW_Pepv4MUCFfl59pISTCwe�LNNn`Cwe�LMer flVIIXE SRP.Eooi Se"ing., Orange County Sanitation District Anaheim 10844 Ellis Avenue,Fountain Valley,CH 92708 714.962.2411 www.ocsd.com Brea Buena Park Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton February 7, 2018 Garden Grove Andy Koester Huntington Beach Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Irvine Water Permits Section 1110 West Washington Street, 5415-B-3 La Habra Phoenix, Arizona 85007 La Palma SUBJECT: Orange County Sanitation District's Annual Compliance Report Los Alamitos Newport Beach Enclosed please find the Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) Biosolids Management Compliance Report as required under the 40 CFR Part 503 Orange regulations,Arizona Administrative Code Article 10, and the National Pollution Placentia Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. CA0110604, Order No. R8- 2012-0035. Santa Ana OCSD has uploaded this report into EPA's biosolids electronic reporting database, Seal Beach and submitted e-mail copies to state and local regulators. A copy of OCSD's Arizona biosolids annual reporting form is included as Appendix E, and the EPA Stanton electronic report is included as Appendix D Tustin Certification Statement Villa Park The following certifications satisfy procedural requirements as listed in Arizona Administrative Code Article 10 under section R78-9-1013 for the submittal of the County of orange attached EPA 40 CFR Part 503 Compliance Report for calendar year 2017. Costa Mesa Arizona Class B I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the Sanitary District IY� p ty I'm Y description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been Midway City made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that Sanitary District qualified personnel properly p p pe y gather and evaluate the information used to determine Irvine Ranch whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are Water District significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and Yorbimprisonment. Water Linda District Our Mission: 7o protect public health and the environment by providing effective wastewater collection, treatment, and recycling. 'Y 51NIIN •9 f !NE MY` If you have any questions or comments regarding this packet of information or require any additional data, please contact Deirdre Bingman at(714) 593-7459. I can be reached at(714) 593-7508. Ron d Coss Laboratory, Monitoring, and Compliance Manager RC/DEB:bg M1Ie MWIm IbcsCdg4s`B'q(:aryNen¢8¢diOpV'gr,pianp_Re sV nuM NeFmh FRM0 01TCare,_Le rslCv LMIery QE Enclosure TABLE OF CONTENTS 2017 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE REPORT Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 Organization and Function .....................................................................................................1 2017 Accomplishments ..........................................................................................................1 Treatment Plants and Program Updates................................................................................3 BiosolidsManagement...........................................................................................................5 Summaryof Pollutants ...........................................................................................................5 Determination of Hazardousness...........................................................................................5 Biosolids Management System..............................................................................................6 APPENDIX A Table 1: OCSD Biosolids Wet and Dry Tonnage Distribution for 2017, Plant No. 1 Table 2: OCSD Biosolids Wet and Dry Tonnage Distribution for 2017, Plant No. 2 Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report, January— December 2017 APPENDIX B OCSD's Pretreatment Program Annual Report, FY 2016-2017 Solids Management Program, Chapter 9 APPENDIX C Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Analysis in Biosolids for 2017 APPENDIX D EPA Biosolids Annual Report Electronic Form for Reporting Year 2017, Plant No. 1 EPA Biosolids Annual Report Electronic Form for Reporting Year 2017, Plant No. 2 APPENDIX E Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Biosolids Annual Report Form for Reporting Year 2017 APPENDIX F Biosolids Program History 2017 BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE REPORT Introduction Organization and Function 2017 Accomplishments Treatment Plants and Program Updates Biosolids Management Summary of Pollutants Determination of Hazardousness Biosolids Management System Introduction The Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) Biosolids Program is responsible for the treatment and management of OCSD's biosolids. OCSD recognizes the importance of building strong relationships throughout its biosolids value chain, including with interested parties and regulators. OCSD practices continuous improvement in all areas of its Biosolids Program through our internal biosolids management system. The following sections summarize OCSD's activities and performance for the compliance- reporting period of January 1 to December 31, 2017. Organization and Function OCSD is a public agency that provides wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services for approximately 2.5 million people in central and northwest Orange County. OCSD is a special district that is governed by a Board of Directors consisting of 25 board members appointed from 20 cities, two sanitary districts, two water districts and one representative from the Orange County Board of Supervisors. OCSD has two operating facilities (Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach) that treat wastewater from residential, commercial and industrial sources. Through this last calendar year while operating under National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. CA0110604: • OCSD treated an average daily sewage influent flow of 190 million gallons per day (MGD), up slightly from last year. • OCSD produced approximately 287,697 wet tons of biosolids (49,119 dry metric tons), which equates to an average of 788 wet tons per day of biosolids, including digester cleanings managed as biosolids (784 tons per day excluding digester cleanings). 2017 Accomplishments This year's accomplishments of the Biosolids Program include: • Recycled of 100% of OCSD's biosolids. • OCSD completed a comprehensive Biosolids Master Plan (ocsd.com/BMPLthat is providing a long-term -� framework for a sustainable, cost-effective biosolids management program. The Plan recommended building two-phased anaerobic digesters at Plant No. 2 r to address seismic issues with existing digesters while creating an essentially pathogen-free biosolids product. In addition, OCSD plans to install a food waste BIOSOLIDS receiving station at Plant No. 2. The food waste facility MASTER PLAN will support state and local organics recycling goals including the Year 2020 requirement to divert all � ' o organic (recyclable material)from landfills. Food waste will be co-digested to create more biogas and electricity, as well as a few 1 additional biosolids trucks. The interim food waste facility is expected to be online in 2021, and the new digestion complex is expected to start-up in 2030. The Master Plan also reviewed and updated the former program guiding principles and formalized an updated set as the "Ten Tenets of OCSD's Biosolids Management Plan" See page 8 for a list of the tenets and OCSD's performance relative to them. • Project P1-100 was completed. This project cleaned and / rehabilitated each of the Plant No. 1 digesters. Now maintenance has a target of follow-up cleaning every five years. The first follow-up cleaning was performed on Digester 7 in 2017. • OCSD issued a new dry-ton based bid that was awarded to Synagro to clean digesters at both plants. • Ongoing quarterly research meetings with sister agencies to evaluate new technologies that could be considered by OCSD. OCSD has piloted several of the technologies featured at these quarterly presentations. • OCSD established a biosolids compost demonstration planter at Plant No. 2 as part of an existing landscaping project (cover photo). The planter uses the same native plants as nearby control planters that didn't use biosolids. Five and ten percent biosolids compost were amended into the soil. The landscape architects and soil laboratories did not want to use biosolids compost because of the salinity analyses, so OCSD intends this demonstration will show the assimilative capacity of biosolids that is not reflected in the laboratory analysis. If successful, this demonstration will also show that the plants survive and thrive when the laboratory analyses counter-indicate biosolids because the analyses do not necessarily directly correlate to the actual field performance, and because biosolids is a more complicated blend of compounds that allow assimilative bonds that have remediating effects. i i ap J 2 Treatment Plants and Program Updates Reclamation Plant No. 1, located in the city of Fountain Valley, treated an average of 113 MGD of wastewater. Treatment Plant No. 2, located in the City of Huntington Beach, treated an average of 77 MGD of wastewater during the reporting period. Last year, OCSD provided an average of 124 MGD to the Ground Water Replenishment System (GWRS), which purifies OCSD's secondary treated water from Plant No. 1 to meet drinking water standards for reuse. GWRS is a joint project of OCSD and the Orange County Water District (OCWD). Plant No. 1 diverted approximately 50,000 cubic feet or 0.37 MGD of primary sludge from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2 via the inter-plant sludge line. The diversion is anticipated to end in 2019 when Plant No. 1's solids-thickening centrifuges come online. OCSD's plants both produce anaerobically digested biosolids to provide compliance with the "Class B Pathogen Reduction" and "Vector Attraction Reduction" definition for "Class B" biosolids as defined in 40 CFR Part 503.32(b)(3) (PSRP 3) and 503.33(b)(1), respectively. In addition, Tule Ranch/AgTech's standard operating procedure includes incorporation within 6 hours which meets 40 CFR Part 503.33(b)(10) requirement if OCSD's treatment plants fail to meet the Vector Attraction Reduction standard. OCSD's biosolids are digested for at least 15 days at a minimum of 95 degrees Fahrenheit, with a volatile solids destruction of at least 38% (typically about 60%). The resulting biosolids average about 18% total solids at Plant No. 1 and 20% total solids at Plant No. 1. More detailed data, including monthly averages and annual totals, can be viewed in Figure 1 and Table 2 below, as well as in appendices A and D. Plant No. 2's Digester E cleaning was completed at the beginning of 2017, and Plant No. 1's Digester 7 was cleaned in the Fall 2017. 3 Figure 1: Biosolids Production History January 1992-December 2017(not including digester cleanings) 3 'Wo No Nosoo aoo - roo 2w,aoo 3p X� soo p200,000 -' x' Soo ° teo,aoo MO m w c f Doo � 100000 � �Pt-ammi xet tmklrrtam) 200 Q �CW �P2-amwlxHbrs(Mark) �CwnGM P�&P3 amualxe��mslMa�) 1eo -+-CwnCY,al P18 P1 a�eage annualbvs ptt6y(npla akl '`9�^9�,.4�^4�,.°j�190^♦.4�,.9�'��`�O^`�&�'��`��`���'P�`��'�^p'�,1'P,ry`�,A'�,p'�^y`�,0`�^^ _ ce�a>re,e The Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) discharges its untreated solids (sludge) to OCSD. IRWD is currently constructing their own solids treatment facility and plans to cease sending their solids to OCSD when IRWD completes start-up of new solids handling facilities, now estimated for years 2020-2021. This cessation is anticipated to reduce Plant No. 1's influent solids by ten to fifteen percent. OCSD is constructing new facilities that will replace the belt filter presses with new dewatering centrifuge facilities. The total percent solids of digested biosolids is anticipated to increase from 18% (Plant No. 1) and 20% (Plant No. 2) to 28-30%, resulting in approximately one-third fewer wet-weight solids and biosolids trucks to manage. This project is also installing pre-digestion thickening centrifuges to replace the dissolved air floatation thickening at Plant No. 1 and rehabilitating the Plant No. 1 truck loading facility. Projects at both plants are anticipated to be complete in 2019. 4 Biosolids Management Biosolids produced at OCSD's two treatment facilities were managed by the contractors listed below in Table 1. Table 1- Biosolids Management Contractors Tule Ranch /Ag-Tech Synagro - Nursery Products 4324 E. Ashlan Ave. PO Box 1439 Fresno, CA 93726 Helendale, CA 92342 Contact: Sheen Magan Contact: Fred Brutsche Phone: (559) 970-9432 Phone: (661) 770-6861 Email: kurt@westexp.com Email: frutsche@SYNAGRO.com Liberty Compost Synagro—Arizona Soils 12421 Holloway Rd. 5615 S. 91st Avenue Lost Hills, CA 93249 Tolleson, AZ 85353 Contact: Patrick McCarthy Contact: Craig Geyer Phone: (661) 797-2914 Phone: (623) 936-6328 Email: patrickmccarthy@mccarthyfarms.com Email: CGeyer@SYNAGRO.com Inland Empire Regional Composting Authority 12645 6th Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Contact: Jeff Ziegenbein Phone: (909) 993-1981 Email:i.ziegenbein@ieua.org These biosolids management contractors provide OCSD with diversification and reliability and are therefore important partners in OCSD's biosolids management program. Contractors submit their annual compliance reports directly to EPA, as applicable and in accordance with OCSD's NPDES permit requirements. For this reporting period, OCSD's biosolids were beneficially reused in the areas following in Table 2. More detailed breakdowns are available in appendices A and D. 5 Table 2- Biosolids Manacled Tonna a Distribution Quantity Generated Plant No. 1 Plant No.2 Total Relative % Synagro-Nusery Products CA-(compost) wet tons 96,007 507 96,514 34% Synagro-Nuse Products CA-(compost) tl metric tons 14,803 92 14,895 Liberty Compost CA wet tons 34,867 7,317 42,183 15% Liberty Compost CA(dry metric tons 5,376 1,327 6,703 Inland Empire Regional Composting wet tons 0 15,081 15,081 5% Inland Empire Regional Composting tl metric tons 0 2,736 2,736 Tule Ranch AZ(land application) wet tons 2,357 129,932 132,288 46% Tule Ranch AZ(land application) tl metric tons 363 23,670 23,933 Synagro AZ Soils(compost)(wet tons) (digester cleanings onl 914 716 1,630 0.6% Synagro,AZ Soils(compost)(dry metric tons) (digester cleanings only) 475 377 862 Total Wet Tons 134,144 153,552 287,697 100% Total Dry Metric Tons 21,018 28,101- 49,119 Note that there is a one ton difference in the value reported on EPA electronic report versus OCSD's annual report due to rounding. Summary of Pollutants Since 1976, OCSD's Pretreatment Program has been effective in lowering the average mass of metals discharged to the marine environment by 98% and the total mass of metals in the influent sewage by 86%, thereby ensuring OCSD's biosolids can be recycled to farm fields with low metals concentrations. Furthermore, OCSD's influent wastewater meets drinking water standards for metals. Appendix B contains the biosolids chapter of OCSD's Pretreatment Program Annual Report (ocsd.com/SCAnnual, Chapter 9). OCSD's monthly Biosolids Monthly Compliance Reports compare the concentration limits of the pollutants listed in 40 CFR 503 to OCSD's average biosolids concentrations for each plant. The average concentrations of all pollutants in OCSD's biosolids are typically an order of magnitude below the conservative Table-1 Ceiling Limits and Table 3 Exceptional Quality Limits found in 40 CFR Part 503, which were based on an extensive health risk assessment and govern whether biosolids are safe for recycling. In accordance with OCSD's NPDES permit, biosolids are also tested semi-annually for all pollutants listed under Section 307(a) of the Clean Water Act. Appendix C contains the summary of the priority pollutants analyzed in the plants' biosolids. Determination of Hazardousness Generally speaking, OCSD's biosolids are several orders of magnitude below state and federal hazardous waste limits. However, OCSD performs semi-annual testing of an extensive list of organic and inorganic compounds to verify the continued non- hazardousness of our biosolids. 6 Legal Definitions OCSD's 2012 Ocean Discharge NPDES permit requires OCSD to test its biosolids annually for hazardousness in accordance with 40 CFR Part 261. Hazardous waste is also defined under the provisions of California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Chapter 11, Article 5, and Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 49, Chapter 5, Article 2. Determination OCSD's biosolids are determined to be non-hazardous based on the following: • OCSD's biosolids are not ignitable, corrosive, reactive, nor toxic in accordance with the federal regulatory definitions in 40 CFR Part 261. • OCSD's biosolids are tested at twice annually for the determination of hazardousness. OCSD's biosolids' pollutant concentrations are significantly below the state and federal maximum contaminant concentrations for determining a hazardous waste. See OCSD's biosolids monitoring data in Appendix C, Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Analysis. Biosolids Management System OCSD continues to utilize our biosolids management system to effectively administer its biosolids program. The following sections highlight OCSD's continued commitment to the biosolids management system. Communications OCSD has continued transparent communications during this reporting period. • Monthly compliance reports and data are posted online (ocsd.com/nani). • One interested party newsletter was emailed and posted on OCSD's website (www.ocsd.com/biosolids). • OCSD shared timely updates including the final publication of our Biosolids Master Plan, annual compliance report, and change of contractors and facilities. Contractor Oversight Program OCSD has continued our strong contractor oversight program, including: Addressing 9 contractor issues with one to be resolved in early 2018 • Performing 8 contractor site inspections 61 hauler inspections • Two contractor accidents occurred in 2017 in which several tons of biosolids were released and recovered. The releases were reported to Regional Water Control Board having jurisdiction in the area. Biosolids Management System Evaluation OCSD staff completed an almost two-year process of reviewing, evaluating, and streamlining various parts of its management system after"graduating" from the National Biosolids Partnership in 2015. As a result of this process, almost all of the day- to-day processes were retained, with most of the streamlining occurring around tasks where OCSD saw diminishing return and value such as management system audits, 7 meetings with management that were focused on the system, and the annual brochure. OCSD is replacing management system audits with compliance audits. Goals and Targets OCSD's November 2013 Strategic Plan contained numerous agency-wide goals and levels of service targets for 2014-2019. The Plan was updated in December 2015 and December 2017 to provided progress to date, including the completion of seven of the eight strategic goals. The "Future Biosolids Management Options" goal was completed in 2017 as part of OCSD's Biosolids Master Plan. See www.ocsd.com/5vearstrategici)lan for more information. Biosolids Program Policv The Biosolids Program Policy, originally adopted in 1999 and amended several times over the years, is a policy committing the agency to support biosolids beneficial reuse (organics recycling). The most recent commitments, OCSD Resolution 13-03 (www.ocsd.com/policv), and OCSD's performance relative to these commitments are reported below. Table 3— Policy Performance Policy Commitment 2017 Performance 1. Commit to sustainable OCSD has demonstrated effective pretreatment,water and biosolids program. solids treatment operations, compliance, capital improvements, technology research and planning, and biosolids contractor Support the recycling of oversight programs. biosolids. See this year's accomplishments at the beginning of this report. 2. Strive to balance financial, On a day-to-day basis, OCSD is weighing these considerations environmental, and and looking out for issues that would alter the balance. For Societal Considerations instance, allocating our biosolids to our diverse locations considers this"triple bottom line,"but also considers contractors when making biosolids performance and the 2017 Master Plan's Ten Tenets. decisions. 3. Utilize a blosolids OCSD continues to maintain our biosolids management system management system to as outlined in this section. maintain a sustainable and publicly supported biosolids program. 4. Diversify portfolio of offsite See Table 2 for breakdown of our active biosolids management biosolids management options. options with multiple See Ten Tenets reporting table below. biosolids contractors, markets, facilities, and OCSD maintained more than 10 times (1000%)our daily maintaining fall-safe back- biosolids production in failsafe facility capacity. OCSD also up capacity of at least maintained about 25% extra hauling capacity. 100% of its daily biosolids production. 5. Research and implement OCSD's Research group actively seeks opportunities for ways to reduce the volume process area improvements, including solids. of biosolids at the 8 treatment plants to OCSD is continuing to monitor the Superoritical Water Oxidation minimize the need for technology(www.scf.eu)and the progress towards a feasible offsite management. pilot plant. As mentioned in the"Treatment Plants and Program Updates" section above, OCSD's production of biosolids is anticipated to drop by about one-third once the dewatering centrifuges come online in 2019. 6. Support continuing OCSD continued our support of the Northwest Biosolids'library research of biosolids (www.nwbiosolids.om). The library contains references to over benefits and potential 2,600 biosolids-related research articles references. Northwest Biosolids sends a monthly summary of research to its members, safety concerns. so we can more easily digest the scientific information and better communicate with interested parties. Northwest Biosolids also has a free monthly e-Bulletin for non-members. In 2015, based on extensive research, the Northwest Biosolids association published a oublic-friendly risk brochure explaining how long it takes for workers and other"exposed populations"to accumulate a dose-equivalent of pharmaceuticals or personal care products from exposure to biosolids(most in the thousands to hundred-thousands of years). 7. Demonstrate the benefits OCSD maintains compost piles at each plant.This compost is of biosolids compost by available to our employees and our landscape contractor to using it at the District's demonstrate the benefits of compost. OCSD encourages facilities. employees to share their compost use photos. See the first section for pictures of our new demonstration planter. Planning: Ten Tenets of OCSD's Biosolids Management Plan Read more on OCSD's Ten Tenets and the Biosolids Master Plan at ocsd.com/bmo. Table 4—Ten Tenets of Biosolids Management Performance Policy Commitment 2017 Performance 1. Allocate up to 50 percent Each contractor received less than 50% of OCSD's biosolids. of biosolids per biosolids See Table 2 for relative tonnage distribution this year. See contractor. OCSD's current map of where OCSD's biosolids are allocated at ocsd.com/map. 2. Allocate up to 50 percent OCSD's biosolids(54%)were are turned into compost at three of biosolids to each regional facilities. Combined,these facilities'distributed OCSD's biosolids in the following geographic markets (54% is subdivided geographic end use into counties): market. • 31°/to Kern County, 10%to Riverside County • 5%San Bernardino County, 4%to Tulare, • 2%to Los Angeles County,and • Less than 1%to Orange County,Ventura County, San Diego County, and Nevada. OCSD's biosolids(46%)were used to raise feed crops and seed crops. producing3,714 tons of crops for local Arizona farmers. 9 Table 4—Ten Tenets of Biosolids Management Performance Policy Commitment 2017 Performance 3. Maintain at least three (3) OCSD maintained four(4)different management facilities. See different biosolids Table 2 for relative tonnage distribution this year. See OCSD's management facilities at current map of where OCSD's biosolids are allocated at ocsd.com/map. any time. 4. Maintain at least two (2) OCSD maintained two(2)different management practices, different biosolids composting and land application (direct farming of feed crops management practices at with biosolids). See Table 2 for relative tonnage distribution this year. See OCSD's current map of where OCSD's biosolids are any time. allocated at ocsd.com/mao. 5. Maintain at least two (2) OCSD and its biosolids management contractors utilized three different hauling (3)different hauling companies(GIC, Tule RanchNVestern companies within the Express,and Denali). biosolids management portfolio. 6. Maintain at least 200 OCSD maintained an average of about 1200%contingency percent contingency capacity. capacity at end use sites. 7. Maintain 20 percent fail- OCSD maintained an average of 44%fail-safe hauling rapacity. safe hauling capacity. 8. Track and encourage OCSD entered discussions with Anaergia, who is planning to development of emerging redevelop a Rialto facility to receive food waste and biosolids to markets and/or end uses produce electricity and biochar. The facility is expected to come online in 2020. for biosolids, especially for local end use options. In addition, OCSD rejoined the Association of Compost Producers(ACP),which is the local chapter for the US Composting Council.ACP is dedicated to increasing the quality, value and amount of compost being produced and used in California.ACP members work and invest together to increase compost markets and improve compost product and manufacturing standards.The association provides education and communication on compost benefits and proper use through support of scientific research,and legislation,aligned with developing and expanding quality compost markets. 9. Allocate up to 10 percent No tonnage was allocated to emerging markets or pilots this of total biosolids year. Several future opportunities are in progress for potential production for future allocation of OCSD's biosolids. participation in emerging markets, including participation in pilot or demonstration projects. 10.Explore partnerships with OCSD is closely following the work being done by San area soil blenders to Francisco Public Utilities Commission to research and develop 10 Table 4—Ten Tenets of Biosolids Management Performance Policy Commitment 2017 Performance allow incorporation of their temperature-phase anaerobically digested biosolids soil OCSD's Class A product blend product recipe and roll-out the product to local markets. into local markets. OCSD's efforts will follow suit at the appropriate time since there are about twelve years until the OCSD facilities are commissioned. 11 APPENDIX A Table 1: OCSD Biosolids Wet and Dry Tonnage Distribution for 2017, Plant No. 1 Table 2: OCSD Biosolids Wet and Dry Tonnage Distribution for 2017, Plant No. 2 Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report, January — December 2017 Table 1 - OCSD Biosolids Wet and Dry Tonnage Distribution for 2017 Reclamation Plant No. 1, Fountain Valley, CA Process ASsee meddt Jan Feb Mar Pairs May June Jul Au Se Oct Nov Dec Annual Avers a Biosclans Total 6o9ds(%) 17 1 19 19 18 18 17 18 18 19 19 19 7 18 Guangty Generated Jan -FZ-7 Men April MayJune Jul 13,M13,� ep old Nov Dec Total Synapm-No.,P"Jucts CA- wmpost(wetlons) 6,533 6,874 0,033 0,025 0,130 0,745 9,265 9] ],]44 0,160 0,360 %,00] SJnal-Null Products CA- compoM do,metrlcrons) 1,IA)] 1,060 1,239 1,237 1,254 1,348 1,429 1]i 1,194 1,259 1,290 14,003 Tule Ranch AZ-lal appilcallon (wettonu) 25 0 0 0 0 122 276 0 290 0 179 2,357 Tule Radon AZ-laM appllratlon (dry metric tons) 4 0 0 0 0 19 43 52 bfi 0 20 363 Loan,Compost CA(wet tons) 4,029 3,100 1,%6 1,431 954 2,141 2,690 54 3,861 4,089 4,063 3g86T LibertyCompostCA(dry mevip tone) 621 4]8 288 221 14] 330 416 48631 on 6,376 Inlantl Empire Regional Composting (wet tons) 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0L12,61 0 Inlantl Empire Reploral Compostirq (dry metric tons) 0 0 0 0 0 0 id 0 0 0 0 Total Wet Tons 10,50] 9,Wd 9,899 9,d58 908d 1100] 122d0 ,139 11,903 12,25] 133,230 Total Dry Metric Tons 1,632 1,538 1,526 1,458 1,091 1691 188T 8]2 17835 17890 20,543 Digester Cleanings Die] DI9] Total Digester Cleaning Total Solids(h) (assists) w 56 SynalA Solls(oompost) (wet tme)(digeater call only) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 893 0 914 Synal A Soils(dampen (dry means Was) di eater del aonl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fi 4]0 0ILL- Table 2 - OCSD Biosolids Wet and Dry Tonnage Distribution for 2017 Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2, Huntington Beach, CA Process Assessment Jan Feb Mar dl M June Jul Au 01 Nov Dec Annual avers e Diosoiias Total solids(�) 20 21 20 20 20 20 21 20 20 21 1 21 1 21 20 Quantity General Total Jan FeU May Aptl p D N. l May June July Aug gets N Dec Synagro-Nusery Prodoom CA- compost(wet tons) 50 0 101 126 0 0 0 25 51 153 0 0 507 Synagro-Nosey,Froducls CA- compost(drymetrictons) 9 0 18 23 0 0 0 5 9 28 0 0 92 Tole Rmoun AZ-land application (wet tore) 12,04) 111946 12,672 111640 12,"1 11417 10,997 10,973 916% 9,123 8731 9,652 129,932 Tole Saloom AZ-land application (dry metal rona) 2,184 2,167 2,299 2,111 2,184 2,071 1,9% 1,990 1759 1,655 1,684 1,669 23,570 Dmedy Compost CA(wet tons) 75 808 1,239 1,789 1,790 883 1]] 304 0 127 0 125 ],31] needy Compost CA (dry metro rona) 14 1 147 1 225 325 1 325 1 160 1 32 1 55 1 0 1 23 1 0 1 23 1,327 Inland Empire Regional Composting (wet tore) 1,036 980 1,129 988 11135 11095 1,049 1,544 11545 1,646 1,539L253 15,081 Inland Empire Regional Composting (dry metric tons) 188 1]8 205 179 206 199 190 280 280 299 279 2,]36 Total Wet Tons 13,202 13,]34 15,141 14,543 14,%] 13,395 12222 12,846 11,295 11,049 10,2]0 152,836 Total Dry li Tons 2,395 2,491 2,]4] 2,638 2,]15 ;430 2,21] 2,330 2,049 2004 1,80 2],]25 r Digester Cleanings Dlg E Total Digester Clean,Total Sony(%) (average) 59 Synagro AZ Soils(onmroN) (wM twn)(dlgester cleanings only) 716 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 716 Synagro.AZ Soils(compoat) (tlry meta.Was) (digester deaning%only) 3]] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 371' Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach CA Monitoring Period:January 1-31, 2017 This notice and necessary information demonstrates compliance with requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 Part 503 and the Arizona Administrative Code Title 18, Chapter 9, Article 10 for land application pollutant concentrations, Class B pathogen reduction via anaerobic digestion (40CFR 503.32(b)(3)(A)(3),AAC R18-9-1006(E)(5)), and vector attraction reduction via volatile solids reduction (40CFR 503.33(b)(1), AAC R18-9-1010(A)(1)). Sampling date(s): 01/04/17,01/11/17 Mercury Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Zinc Ammonia Organic pH Total VSR (mg/kg dry:(mglkg dry)(mg/kg dry)(mglkg dry)(mglkg dry(mg/kg dry) (mglkg dry) (mg/kg dry:(mglkg dry)(mg/kg tlry Nitrogen Nitrogen Solids (/) (mg/kg dry (mg/kg dry) (%) Plant 1.1 10 4.2 37 440 10 ONO 14 28 4.9 670 5,500 51,000 8.1 17 57 Max/Min* Plant 1 Avg 0.99 9.7 4.0 36 420 9.2 DNQ 14 28 4.7 640 5,500 49,000 17 Plant 1.0 9.1 6.6 39 460 12 14 26 4.5 760 4,900 46,000 7.9 20 61 Max/Min' Plant 2 Avg 0.76 8.7 6.2 39 450 12 14 25 3.1 DNQ 740 4,800 44,000 20 Table 1 57 75 85 3000 4300 840 75 420 100 7500 N/A N/A 6.5 15 38 (Max/Min)` Table 3(Avg) 17 1 41 1 39 1 N/A 1 1500 1 300 1 N/A 1 420 100 1 2800 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OCSD Plant 1 System Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig. 10 Dig. 11 Dig. 12 Dig. 13 Dig. 14 Dig. 15 Dig.16 Summary Minimum Mean Cell 18 18 17 18 18 18 Out of Out of Out of 18 18 Residence Time Service Service Service (Min 15 days)" Minimum 99 100 100 100 100 99 Out of Out of Out of 99 99 Temperature Service Service Service (Min 95°F) OCSD Plant 2 System Dig.C Dig.D Dig.E Dig.F Dig.G Dig.H Dig. I Dig.J Dig.L Dig.M Dig. N Dig.O Dig.P Dig.O Dig.R Dig.S Dig.T Summary Minimum Mean Cell 19 20 19 Out of 19 19 Out of 19 20 20 Out of 20 19 19 20 19 19 20 Residence Time Service Service Service (Min 15 days)- Minimum 97 97 98 Out of 97 98 Out of 100 101 99 Out of 98 97 98 98 98 99 100 Temperature Service Service Service (Min 95°F) DNQ(Detected, Not Quantified)represents estimated values above the method detection limit(MDL),but below the reporting limit(RL). Maximum values are reported for metals and nitrogen parameters; minimum values are reported for pH,volatile solids reduction(VSR)and total solids.Analysis of pH is conducted to comply with AAC R18-9-1007(A)(1).The limit for total solids applies only if biosolids are sent to a California landfill,per CCR Title 27 Section 20220(c)(3). "'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach CA Monitoring Period:January 1-31, 2017 Certifications: NPDES permit: I certify,under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: 1 certify, under penalty of law, that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. X X �G - JamesSpears ispears@oad.com Ronald Coss rcoss@ocsd.com Operations Manager (714)593-7081 Lab, Mon.&Compliance Mgr (714)593-7508 Signed by Spears,Jim Signed by.Coss, Ronald Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach CA Monitoring Period: February 1-28,2017 This notice and necessary information demonstrates compliance with requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 Part 503 and the Arizona Administrative Code Title 18, Chapter 9,Article 10 for land application pollutant concentrations, Class B pathogen reduction via anaerobic digestion (40CFR 503.32(b)(3)(A)(3), AAC R18-9-1006(E)(5)), and vector attraction reduction via volatile solids reduction (40CFR 503.33(b)(1),AAC R18-9-1010(A)(1)). Sampling date(s): 02/01/17(Plant 1), 02/02/17(Plant 2).02/08/17(Plant 1 &Plant 21 Mercury Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Zinc Ammonia Organic pH Total VSR (mg/kg (mg/kg (mg/kg dry) (mg/kg dry) (mgtkg dry) (mg/kg dry) (mg/kg dry) (mg/kg dry) (mg/kg dry) (mg/kg dry) Nitrogen Nitrogen Solids (/) tlry) dM (mNkg dry) (mg1kg dry) (%) Plant Avg 1.2 12 5.5 37 440 13 16 35 5.6 DNO 650 5,200 51,000 19 Plants 1.3 16 6.0 42 490 14 18 41 8.1 730 5,200 53,000 8.1 18 52 Max/Min` Plant 0.76 18 6.1 50 500 16 17 32 4.9 800 4,900 47,000 8.2 20 60 Max/Min` Plant 2 Avg 0.72 13 5.8 43 460 15 15 28 3.9 DNO 720 4,700 43,000 21 Table 1 57 75 85 3000 4300 840 75 420 100 7500 N/A N/A 6.5 15 38 (Max/Min)" Table 3 17 41 39 N/A 1500 300 N/A 420 100 2800 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (Avg) OCSD Plant 1 System Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig.10 Dig. 11 Dig. 12 Dig.13 Dig. 14 Dig. 15 Dig.16 Summary Minimum Mean Cell 18 17 17 17 17 18 Out of Out of Out of 18 18 Residence Time Service Service Service (Min 15 days)"" Minimum 99 100 99 99 100 99 Out of Out of Out of 100 99 Temperature Service Service Service (Min 95°F) OCSD Plant 2 System Dig.C Dig. D Dig.E Dig.F Dig.G Dig.H Dlg.I Dig.J Dig. L Dig. M Dig.N Dig.O Dig. P Dig.O Dig.R Dig.8 Dig.T Summary Minimum Mean Cell 19 20 19 Out of 19 19 Out of 18 19 20 Out of 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 Residence Time Service Service Service (Min 15 days)" Minimum 97 97 98 Out of 97 98 Out of 100 101 99 Out of 99 99 98 98 98 97 100 Temperature Service Service Service (Min 95"F) ONO(Detected, Not Quantified)represents estimated values above the method detection limit(MDL),but below the reporting limit(RL). "Maximum values are reported for metals and nitrogen parameters;minimum values are reported for pH,volatile solids reduction(VSR)and total solids.Analysis of pH is conducted to comply with AAC R18-9-1007(A)(1).The limit for total solids applies only if biosolids are sent to a California landfill,per CCR Title 27 Section 20220(c)(3). ""MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach CA Monitoring Period: February 1-28,2017 Certifications: NPDES permit: I certify, underpenalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible for gathering the information,the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, two,accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law,that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. 1 am aware that theme are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. X X �G - James Spears jspears@ocsd.com Ronald Coss rcoss@ocsd.com Operations Manaqer (714)593-7081 Lab, Mon.&Compliance Mqr (714)593-7508 Signed by.Spears,Jim Siqned by Coss,Ronald Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report 0 Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:March 1-31,2017 This notice and necessary information demonstrates compliance with requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 Part 503 and the Arizona Administrative Code Title 18, Chapter 9, Article 10 for land application pollutant concentrations, Class B pathogen reduction via anaerobic digestion (40CFR 503.32(b)(3)(A)(3),AAC R18-9-1006(E)(5)), and vector attraction reduction via volatile solids reduction (40CFR 503.33(b)(1), AAC R18-9-1010(A)(1)). Sampling date(s): 03/01/17,03/08117 Mercury Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Molybdenum Nickel Selenium zinc Ammonia organic pH Total VSR (mglkg (mglkg dry) (mg/kg dry) (mglkg dry) (mglkg (mglkg (mglkg dry) (mg/kg (mg/kg dry) (mglkg Nitrogen Nitrogen Solids (%) dry) dry) dry) dry) dry) (mg/kg dry) (mglkg dry) (%) Plant 1 0.73 7.5 4.6 42 470 13 16 40 12 680 6,200 47,000 8.0 18 60 Max/Min' Plant 1 Avg 0.69 11 ONO 4.5 41 450 13 16 39 7.4 DNQ 680 5,700 44,000 19 Plant 2 Avg 0.74 12 6.5 44 400 12 16 34 5.5 DNQ 850 5,400 44,000 20 Plant 0.75 16 7.2 46 450 13 17 39 8.2 1000 6,100 44,000 8.0 20 62 Max/Min' Tablet 57 75 85 3000 4300 840 75 420 100 7500 N/A N/A 6.5 15 38 (Max/Min)' Table 3 17 41 1 39 N/A 1500 300 N/A 1 420 100 2800 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (Avg) OCSD Plant 1a System Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig.10 Dig.11 Dig. 12 Dig. 13 Dig.14 Dig.15 Dig.16 Summary Minimum Mean Cell 17 17 16 17 17 17 Out of 734 Out of 17 17 Residence Time Service Service (Min 15 days)' Minimum 100 100 100 100 100 100 Out of 100 Out of 100 100 Temperature Service Service (Min 95°F) OCSD Plant 2 System Dig.C Dig. D Dig.E Dig. F Dig.G Dig.H Dig. I Dig.J Dig.L Dig. M Dig. N Dig.O Dig.P Dig. Q Dig.R Dig.S Dig.T Summary Minimum Mean Cell 19 19 18 Out of 19 19 Out of 18 19 19 Out of 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 Residence Time Service Service Service (Min 15 days)2 Minimum 96 97 98 Out of 96 98 Out of 100 101 99 Out of 99 99 98 100 98 98 99 Temperature Service Service Service (Min 95°F) DNO(Detected,Not Quantified)represents estimated values above the method detection limit(MDL), but below the reporting limit(RL). ' Maximum values are reported for metals and nitrogen parameters;minimum values are reported for pH,volatile solids reduction(VSR)and total solids.Analysis of pH is conducted to comply with AAC R18-9-1007(A)(1).The limit for total solids applies only if biosolids are sent to a California landfill,per CCR Title 27 Section 20220(c)(3). 2 MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:March 1-31,2017 'March 5,2017-June 7,2017:OCSD discovered that the Plant No. 1 primary sludge flowmeter feeding the Plant No. 1 digesters and the sludge diversion flowmeter in the line that diverts primary sludge from Plant No. 1 to Plant No.2 were inaccurate by up to 50%each.The process engineers corrected the affected diversion flowmeter data by adding 50%flow to be conservative(additional solids into the Plant No.2 headworks,which are considered recycle flows and subtracted from the influent total suspended solids).The primary sludge flowmeter data was not corrected because it would have resulted in higher digestion times(less conservative)and the engineers could not determine the exact daily value by which the meter was inaccurate and the impact to each digester. <Digester 13 was brought back into service on March 30th. Certifications: NPDES permit: I codify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel propeny gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, two, accurate,and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel propedy gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B: I certify, underpenaky of law,that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel propedy gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significantpenalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. X X /W L- James Spears ispears@ocsd.com Ronald Coss rcoss@ocsd.com Operations Manaqer (714)593-7081 Lab, Mon.&Compliance Mpr (714)593-7508 Signed by Spears,Jim Signed by Coss,Ronald z, Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:April 1-30,2017 This notice and necessary information demonstrates compliance with requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 Part 503 and the Arizona Administrative Code Title 18, Chapter 9,Article 10 for land application pollutant concentrations, Class B pathogen reduction via anaerobic digestion (40CFR 503.32(b)(3)(A)(3),AAC R18-9-1006(E)(5)),and vector attraction reduction via volatile solids reduction (40CFR 503.33(b)(1),AAC R18-9-1010(A)(1)). Sampling date(s): 04/05/17.04/12/17 Mercury Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Zinc Ammonia Organic pH Total VSR (mglkg dry) (mglkg dry) (mglkg (mg/kg (mg/kg tlry) (mglkg dry) (mgkg dry) (mgkg (mgkg dry) (mg/kg dry) Nitrogen Nitrogen Solids (/) dry) dry) dry) (mg1k9dry) (mglkg dry) (%) Plant 1 Avg IA 6.9 3.6 34 410 11 DNQ 14 30 5.9 580 5,000 44,000 18 Plant 1 Max/Mid 2.0 7.5 3.7 34 410 11 15 31 5.9 580 5,100 45,000 T9 18 61 Plant 2 Avg 0.63 8.8 5.1 37 440 11 15 30 5.3 710 4,700 45,000 20 Plant 2 Max/Min' 0.73 9.1 5.6 39 460 11 16 31 5.3 730 4,700 49,000 7.9 19 65 Table 1 (MaxlMin)t 57 75 85 3000 4300 840 75 420 100 7500 N/A N/A 6.5 15 38 Table 3(Avg) 17 1 41 1 39 1 N/A 1 1500 1 300 1 N/A 1 420 100 1 2800 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OCSD Plant 1' System Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig.10 Dig.11 Dig.12 Dig. 13 Dig.14 Dig.15 Dig.16 Summary Minimum Mean Cell 17 17 17 17 17 Out of Out of 18 Out of 17 17 Residence Time Service Service Service (Min 15 days)z Minimum 99 100 100 100 100 Outof Outof 99 Out of 100 100 Temperature Service Service Service (Min 95"F) OCSD Plant 2 System Dig.C Dig. D Dig. E Dig.F Dig.G Dig.H Dig.I Dig.J Dig.L Dig.M Dig.N Dig.O Dig. P Dig.Q Dig. R Dig.S Dig.T Summary Minimum Mean Cell 19 20 19 Out of 19 19 Out of 19 20 20 Out of 20 20 19 19 18 19 20 Residence Time Service Service Service (Min 15 days)2 Minimum 96 97 98 Out of 97 98 Out of 100 101 99 Out of 99 98 96 98 98 98 96 Temperature Service Service Service (Min 95°F) DNQ(Detected,Not Quantified)represents estimated values above the method detection limit(MDL), but below the reporting limit(RL). Maximum values are reported for metals and nitrogen parameters;minimum values are reported for pH,volatile solids reduction(VSR)and total solids.Analysis of pH is conducted to comply with AAC R18-9-1007(A)(1).The limit for total solids applies only if biosolids are sent to a California landfill, per CCR Title 27 Section 20220(c)(3). 2 MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:April 1-30,2017 'March 5,2017—June 7,2017:OCSD discovered that the Plant No. 1 primary sludge flowmeter feeding the Plant No. 1 digesters and the sludge diversion flowmeter in the line that diverts primary sludge from Plant No. 1 to Plant No.2 were inaccurate by up to 50%each.The process engineers corrected the affected diversion flowmeter data by adding 50%flow to be conservative(additional solids into the Plant No.2 headworks,which are considered recycle flows and subtracted from the influent total suspended solids).The primary sludge flowmeter data was not corrected because it would have resulted in higher digestion times(less conservative)and the engineers could not determine the exact daily value by which the meter was inaccurate and the impact to each digester. Certifications: NPDES permit: I certify, underpenalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible for gathering the information,the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,true, accurate,and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B:I certify, under penalty of law,that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. X X [%Wz-- James Spears lspears@ocsd.com Ronald Coss rcoss@mxd.com Operations Manager (714)593-7081 lab,Mon.&Compliance Mgr (714)593-7508 Signed by.Spears,Jim Signed by.Coss, Ronald Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period: May 1-31,2017 This notice and necessary information demonstrates compliance with requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 Part 503 and the Arizona Administrative Code Title 18, Chapter 9, Article 10 for land application pollutant concentrations, Class B pathogen reduction via anaerobic digestion (40CFR 503.32(b)(3)(A)(3),AAC R18-9-1006(E)(5)), and vector attraction reduction via volatile solids reduction (40CFR 503.33(b)(1), AAC R18-9-1010(A)(1)). Sampling date(s): 05/03/17,05/10/17 Memul Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Zinc Ammonia Organic pH Total VSR (mg/kg (mglkg (mgtkg dry) (mg/kg (mg/kg dry) (mg/kg dry) (mg/kg dry) (mglkg (mg/kg (mgd g dry) Nitrogen Nitrogen Solids (/) dry) dry) dry) dry) dry) (mg/kg dry) (mg/kg dry) (%) Plant 1 Avg 1.2 8.3 4.2 30 410 9.0 ONO 15 25 11 590 6,300 50,000 18 Plant 1 Max/Min' 1.2 9.1 4.5 31 440 11 15 25 12 630 6,300 52,000 7.7 17 56 Plant 2 Max/Mint 0.68 9.3 5.8 39 520 13 15 27 8.2 840 5,400 48,000 7.7 20 58 Plant 2 Avg 0.65 9.0 5.3 36 470 11 DNQ 14 26 7.4 760 5,400 46,000 20 Table 1 (Max/Min)t 57 75 85 3000 4300 840 75 420 100 7500 N/A N/A 6.5 15 38 Table 3(Avg) 17 41 39 N/A 1500 300 N/A 420 100 2800 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OCSD Plant V System Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig.10 Dig. 11 Dig. 12 Dig.13 Dig.14 Dig.15 Dig.16 Summary Minimum Mean Cell 18 17 17 17 17 624 Out of 18 Out of 17 18 Residence Time Service Service (Min 15 days)' Minimum 99 99 100 100 100 99 Out of 100 Out of 100 100 Temperature Service Service (Min 95°F) OCSD Plant 2 System Dig.C Dig.D Dig.E Dig. F Dig. G Dig.H Dig.I Dig.J Dig.L Dig.M Dig. N Dig.O Dig. P Dig.Q Dig.R Dig.S Dig.T Summary Minimum Mean Cell 18 20 19 Out of 18 18 Out of 18 19 20 Out of 18 19 18 18 18 18 18 Residence Time Service Service Service (Min 15 days)t Minimum 95 95 99 Out of 98 100 Out of 100 101 99 Out of 100 98 99 99 99 100 99 Temperature Service Service Service (Min 95°F) DNQ(Detected, Not Quantified)represents estimated values above the method detection limit(MDL),but below the reporting limit(RL). Maximum values are reported for metals and nitrogen parameters; minimum values are reported for pH,volatile solids reduction(VSR)and total solids. Analysis of pH is conducted to comply with AAC R18-9-1007(A)(1).The limit for total solids applies only if biosolids are sent to a California landfill, per CCR Title 27 Section 20220(c)(3). 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period: May 1-31,2017 March 5,2017—June 7,2017:OCSD discovered that the Plant No. 1 primary sludge flowmeler feeding the Plar l No. 1 digesters and the sludge diversion flowmeter in the line that diverts primary sludge from Plant No. 1 to Plant No.2 were inaccurate by up to 50%each.The process engineers corrected the affected diversion flowmeler data by adding 50%flow to be conservative(additional solids into the Plant No.2 headworks,which are considered recycle flows and subtracted from the influent total suspended solids).The primary sludge flowmeter data was not corrected because it would have resulted in higher digestion times(less conservative)and the engineers could not determine the exact daily value by which the meter was inaccurate and the impact to each digester. ^Digester 11 was placed in service on May 23,2017. Certifications: NPDES permit:I certify,underpenalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is,to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that them are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. /am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B:I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. 12/12/2017 12/12/2017 X x Gz--- James Spears ispears@ocsd.com Ronald Coss rcoss@msdxom Operations Manager (714)593-7081 Lab,Mon.&Compliance Mgr (714)593-7508 Signed by Spears,Jim Signed by,Coss,Ronald Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:June 1-30, 2017 This notice and necessary information demonstrates compliance with requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 Part 503 and the Arizona Administrative Code Title 18, Chapter 9, Article 10 for land application pollutant concentrations, Class B pathogen reduction via anaerobic digestion (40CFR 503.32(b)(3)(A)(3),AAC R18-9-1006(E)(5)), and vector attraction reduction via volatile solids reduction (40CFR 503.33(b)(1), AAC R18-9-1010(A)(1)). Sampling date(a): 06/07/17,06/14117 Mercury Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Zinc Ammonia Organic LpHTotal VSR (mglkg tlry) (mglkg (mglkg (mg/kg (mglkg tlry) (mglkg tlry) (mg/kg dry) (mglkg (mglkg tlry)(mglkg tlry Nitrogen NitrogenSolid (%)dry) dry) dry) dry) (mglkg dry) (mglkg dry) (%)Plant 1 Avg 0.66 8.4 3.3 35 430 11 DNQ 15 32 7.0 600 6,600 50,00017 Plant 1 0.69 8.8 3.3 35 450 12 15 32 8.0 600 6,600 53,000 16 55 Max/Min' Plant 2 0.84 10 4.7 41 460 13 14 35 8.9 730 5,500 50,000 20 58Max/Min' Plant 2 Avg 0.76 7.9 4.3 39 440 13 14 34 8.0 700 5,500 47,00020 Table 1 57 75 85 3000 4300 840 75 420 100 7500 N/A N/A 6.5 15 38 (Max/Min)' Table 3(Avg) 17 41 39 N/A 1500 300 N/A 420 100 2800 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OCSD Plant 14 System Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig.10 Dig.11 Dig. 12 Dig. 13 Dig. 14 Dig. 15 Dig. 16 Summary Minimum Mean Cell 19 17 17 18 17 293 Out of 18 Out of 18 18 Residence Time Service Service (Min 15 days)' Minimum Temperature 99 99 100 100 100 100 Out of 100 Out of 100 100 (Min 95°F) I Service Service OCSD Plant 2 System Dig.C Dig.D Dig.E Dig.F Dig.G Dig. H Dig. I Dig.J Dig.L Dig.M Dig.N Dig.O Dig.P Dig.Q Dig.R Dig.S Dig.T Summary Minimum Mean Cell 18 19 18 Out of 18 18 Out of 18 19 19 Out of 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 Residence Time Service Service Service (Min 15 days)P Minimum 98 98 100 Out of 100 101 Out of 100 101 99 Out of 100 98 100 100 99 100 100 Temperature Service Service Service (Min 95°F) DNQ(Detected,Not Quantified)represents estimated values above the method detection limit(MDL), but below the reporting limit(RL). ' Maximum values are reported for metals and nitrogen parameters;minimum values are reported for pH,volatile solids reduction(VSR)and total solids.Analysis of pH is conducted to comply with AAC R18-9-1007(A)(1).The limit for total solids applies only if biosolids are sent to a California landfill, per CCR Tifle 27 Section 20220(c)(3). 2 MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:June 1-30, 2017 3 Digester 11 was placed in service May 23,2017. 4 March 5,2017—June 7,2017:OCSD discovered that the Plant No. 1 primary sludge flowmeter feeding the Plant No. 1 digesters and the sludge diversion flowmeter in the line that diverts primary sludge from Plant No. 1 to Plant No.2 were inaccurate by up to 50%each.The process engineers corrected the affected diversion flowmeter data by adding 50%flow to be conservative(additional solids into the Plant No. 2 headworks,which are considered recycle flows and subtracted from the influent total suspended solids).The primary sludge flowmeter data was not corrected because it would have resulted in higher digestion times(less conservative)and the engineers could not determine the exact daily value by which the meter was inaccurate and the impact to each digester. Certifications: NPDES permit: I certify,under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel propedy gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B: 1 certify, under penalty of law,that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable bioso/ids requirements have been met. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. X X GG James Spears jspeam@ocsd.mm Ronald Coss rcoss@ocsd.com Operations Manager (714)593-7081 lab, Mon.&Compliance Mgr (714)593-7508 Signed by.Spears,Jim Signed by.Coss, Ronald Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report 0. Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:July 1-31,2017 This notice and necessary information demonstrates compliance with requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 Part 503 and the Arizona Administrative Code Title 18, Chapter 9, Article 10 for land application pollutant concentrations, Class B pathogen reduction via anaerobic digestion (40CFR 503.32(b)(3)(A)(3),AAC R18-9-1006(E)(5)), and vector attraction reduction via volatile solids reduction (40CFR 503.33(b)(1), AAC R18-9-1010(A)(1)). Sampling date(s): 07106117,07/12/17 Mercury Arcenle Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Zlnc Ammonia Organic Total pX Total VSR (mglkg (mglkg dry) (mg'kg (mg/kg dry) (mglkg dry) (mg/kg (mykg dry) (mgVkg dry) (mg/kg dry) (mg/kg dry) Nitrogen Nitrogen Nitrogen Solids (�) dry) dry) dry) (m91kgdry) (mglkgdry) (mg/kgdry) (%) Plant 1 1.1 7.4 5.2 37 430 12 15 34 6.5 650 6,200 43,000 49,000 8.1 17 51 Max/Min' Plant 1 Avg 0.92 7.2 4.4 36 430 10 14 34 6.2 650 6,100 43,000 49,000 18 DNQ Plant 2 Avg 0.76 8.7 4.5 53 480 10 15 33 7.9 730 5,300 42,000 47,000 21 Plant 2 0.82 9.6 5.1 58 490 11 15 34 9.7 750 5,300 42,000 47,000 8.1 21 65 Max/Min' Table 1 57 :11 5 85 3000 4300 840 75 420 100 7500 N/A N/A N/A 6.5 15 38 (Max/Min") Table 3(Avg) 17 41 1 39 1 N/A 1 1500 1 300 1 N/A 1 420 1 100 1 2800 1 N/A I N/A I N/A N/A N/A N/A OCSD Plant 1 System Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig.10 Dig.11 Dig. 12 Dig. 13 Dig.14 Dig.15 Dig. 16 Summary Minimum Mean Cell 23 21 21 21 21 21 7W 21 Out of 21 21 Residence Time Service (Min 15 days)2 Minimum Mean Cell 98 100 100 100 100 100 98 100 Out of 100 100 Residence Time Service (Min 95°F) OCSD Plant 2 System Dig.C Dig. D Dig.E Dig.F Dig.G Dig. H Dig.I D#Dig.L Dig. N Dig.O Dig. P Dig.O Dig. R Dig.S Dig.T SummaryMinimum Mean Cell 19 19 18 Out of 19 19 Out of 18 19 19 19 19 18 19 19 Resitlence Time Service Service(Min 15 days)� Minimum 99 99 100 Out of 100 100 Out of 99 100 100 99 100 100 99 100 Temperature Service Service (Min 95"F) ONO(Detected, Not Quantified)represents estimated values above the method detection limit(MDL),but below the reporting limit(RL). ' Maximum values are reported for metals and nitrogen parameters; minimum values are reported for pH,volatile solids reduction(VSR)and total solids.Analysis of pH is conducted to comply with AAC R18-9-1007(A)(1).The limit for total solids applies only if biosolids are sent to a California landfill,per CCR Title 27 Section 20220(c)(3). a MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. 3 Digester 12 was brought into service on July 11,2017. Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:July 1-31,2017 Certifications: NPDES permit: I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B: I certify, under penalty of law,that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. XX James Spears ispearsilmad.com Ronald Coss rcoss@ocsd.com Operations Manaqer (714)593-7081 Lab, Mon.&Compliance Mqr (714)593-7508 Signed by Spears,Jim Siqned by.Coss, Ronald Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach CA Monitoring Period:August 1-31, 2017 This notice and necessary information demonstrates compliance with requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 Part 503 and the Arizona Administrative Code Title 18, Chapter 9, Article 10 for land application pollutant concentrations, Class B pathogen reduction via anaerobic digestion (40CFR 503.32(b)(3)(A)(3), AAC R18-9-1006(E)(5)), and vector attraction reduction via volatile solids reduction(40CFR 503.33(b)(1),AAC R18-9-1010(A)(1)). Sampling date(s): 08/0 )17.08/09/17 Mercury Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Zinc Ammonia Organic Total pH Total VSR (ri dry)(mg/kg dry)(mg/kg dry)(mg/kg dry)(ri dry)(mg/kg dry) (mglkg dry) (mg/kg tlry)(mg/kg dry)(mg/kg dry) Nitrogen Nitrogen Nitrogen Solids (/) (mg/kg dry) (mg/kg dry) (mg/kg dry) (%) Plants 0.92 8.0 3.7 34 450 11 15 35 5.9 670 6,700 41,000 46,000 7.8 17 60 Max/Min' Plants Avg 0.78 8.0 3.6 34 450 11 DNQ 15 34 5.8 670 6,100 40,000 46,000 18 Plant Avg 0.92 11 7.7 53 590 15 18 38 5.7 910 5,500 35,000 41,000 20 Plant 1.1 12 7.9 56 630 15 19 41 5.9 960 5,600 41,000 47,000 7.8 20 61 Max/Min' Table 1 57 75 85 3000 4300 840 75 420 100 7500 N/A N/A N/A 6.5 15 38 (Max/Min)' Table 3(Avg) i 17 41 1 39 N/A 1500 1 300 N/A 420 100 2800 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OCSD Plant 1' System Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig. 10 Dig.11 Dig. 12 Dig.13 Dig.14 Dig. 15 Dig. 16 Summary Minimum Mean Cell 22 Out of 19 19 19 20 253 20 743 20 20 Residence Time Service (Min 15 days)' Minimum 97 Out of 98 98 98 97 99 98 102 98 98 Temperature Service (Min 95°F) OCSD Plant 2 System Dig.C Dig. D Dig. E Dig.F Dig.G Dig.H Dig.I Dig.J Dig. L Dig. M Dig. N Dig.O Dig. P Dig.Q Dig.R Dig.S Dig.T Summary Minimum Mean Cell 19 20 18 Out of 19 19 Out of 18 19 20 Out of 19 19 19 19 18 18 19 Residence Time Service Service Service (Min 15 days)2 Minimum 99 100 100 Out of 99 100 Out of 100 101 99 Out of 99 100 100 100 100 100 102 Temperature Service Service Service (Min 95 T) DNQ(Detected, Not Quantified)represents estimated values above the method detection limit(MDL), but below the reporting limit(RL). ' Maximum values are reported for metals and nitrogen parameters;minimum values are reported for pH,volatile solids reduction(VSR)and total solids.Analysis of pH is conducted to comply with AAC R18-9-1007(A)(1).The limit for total solids applies only if biosolids are sent to a California landfill,per CCR Title 27 Section 20220(c)(3). 'MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. 3 Digester 12 was back in service on July 11-, and Digester 14 was back in service on August 13'^. Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach CA Monitoring Period:August 1-31, 2017 Certifications: NPDES permit:I certify, underpenalty of law,that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the information submitted is,to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law,that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. X � " X G G� James Spears ispears@oad.com Ronald Coss rcoss@oud.com Operations Manager (714)593-7081 tab, Mon.&Compliance Mqr (714)593-7508 Signed by.Spears,Jim Signed by.Coss, Ronald Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach CA Monitoring Period:September 1-30,2017 This notice and necessary information demonstrates compliance with requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 Part 503 and the Arizona Administrative Code Title 18, Chapter 9, Article 10 for land application pollutant concentrations, Class B pathogen reduction via anaerobic digestion (40CFR 503.32(b)(3)(A)(3),AAC R18-9-1006(E)(5)), and vector attraction reduction via volatile solids reduction(40CFR 503.33(b)(1),AAC R18-9-1010(A)(1)). Sampling dale(s): 09106/17,09/13/17 Mercury Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Zinc Ammonia Organic Total pH Total VSR (mg/kg dry) (mglkg (mg/kg (mg/kg dry) (mykg (mg/kg (mg/kg dry) (mg/kg (mg'kg dry) (mg'kg Nitrogen Nitrogen Nitrogen Solids (%) dry) dry) dry) dry) dry) dry) (mglkg dry) (mglkg dry) (mg/kg dry) (%) Plant 1.0 7.5 4.1 37 460 13 15 32 7.8 690 5,900 52,000 58,000 8.1 18 46 Max/Min' Plant 1 Avg 0.99 7.2 3.9 37 450 11 DNQ 15 32 7.6 680 5,800 48,000 54,000 19 Plant 1.2 11 5.5 47 500 14 16 37 7.9 810 5,600 45,000 51,000 8.1 20 62 Max/Min* Plant 2 Avg 1.1 9.6 5.5 46 480 13 15 36 7.7 780 5,600 44,000 50,000 20 Table 1 57 75 85 3000 4300 840 75 420 100 7500 N/A N/A N/A 6.5 15 38 (Max/Min*) Table 3JAvgi 17 41 1 39 N/A 1500 1 300 1 N/A 420 100 2800 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OCSD Plant 1 System Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig. 10 Dig. 11 Dig. 12 Dig.13 Dig. 14 Dig. 15 Dig. 16 Summary Minimum Mean Cell 21 Out of 21 19 19 20 20 19 25 19 21 Residence Time Service (Min 15 days)** Minimum 97 Out of 97 97 98 98 97 98 97 98 98 Temperature Service (Min 95'1 OCSD Plant 2 System Dig.C Dig.D Dig.E Dig. F Dig.G Dig.H Dig.I Dig.J Dig. L Dig.M Dig. N Dig.O Dig.P Dig.Q Dig. R Dig.S Dig.T Summary Minimum Mean Cell 20 20 19 Out of 20 20 Out of 19 20 20 Out of 20 20 19 20 19 20 20 Residence Time Service Service Service (Min 15 days)** Minimum 99 100 100 Out of 100 100 Out of 100 101 99 Out of 99 99 100 100 100 100 99 Temperature Service Service Service (Min 95°F) DNQ(Detected, Not Quantified)represents estimated values above the method detection limit(MDL),but below the reporting limit(RL). *Maximum values are reported for metals and nitrogen parameters;minimum values are reported for pH,volatile solids reduction(VSR)and total solids.Analysis of pH is conducted to comply with AAC R18-9-1007(A)(1).The limit for total solids applies only if biosoiids are sent to a California landfill,per CCR Title 27 Section 20220(c)(3). **MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach CA Monitoring Period:September 1-30 2017 Certifications: NPDES permit:I certify,under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel propedy gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is,to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. X V x //Wz-- James Spears ispeam@ocsd.com Ronald Coss rcoss@ocsd.com Operations Manager (714)593-7081 Lab, Mon. &Compliance Mqr (714)593-7508 Signed by Spears,Jim Signed by Coss, Ronald Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach CA Monitoring Period: October 1-31, 2017 This notice and necessary information demonstrates compliance with requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 Part 503 and the Arizona Administrative Code Title 18, Chapter 9, Article 10 for land application pollutant concentrations, Class B pathogen reduction via anaerobic digestion (40CFR 503.32(b)(3)(A)(3), AAC R18-9-1006(E)(5)), and vector attraction reduction via volatile solids reduction(40CFR 503.33(b)(1),AAC R18-9-1010(A)(1)). Sampling date(s): 10104117,10/24/17 Mercury Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Zinc Ammonia Organic Total pH Total VSR (mglkg dry)(mglkg dry)(mg/kg dry)(mglkg dry)(mg/kg dry)(mg/kg dry; (mglkg dry) (mglkg dry)(mg/kg dry)(mg/kg dry) Nitrogen Nitrogen Nitrogen Solids (/) (mglkg dry)(mg/kg dry)(mg/kg dry) (%) Plant 1 1.3 9.3 3.3 34 420 11 14 31 6.8 630 5,700 44,000 49,000 8.1 19 60 Max/Min' Plant 1 Avg 1.1 7.7 2.9 33 400 11 14 28 6.0 610 5,600 44,000 49,000 20 Plant 0.91 10 5.9 39 430 12 14 32 5.9 700 5,700 41,000 47,000 8.0 20 59 Max/Min' Plant Avg 0.81 8.4 5.9 38 420 12 14 31 5.6 700 5,600 41,000 46,000 21 Table 1 57 75 85 3000 4300 840 75 420 100 7500 N/A N/A N/A 6.5 15 38 (Max/Mi- r Table 3(Avg) 17 41 39 N/A 1500 300 N/A 420 100 2800 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OCSD Plant 1 System Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig. 10 Dig.11 Dig. 12 Dig.13 Dig.14 Dig.15 Dig. 16 Summary Minimum Mean Cell 21 Out of 20 20 20 21 21 20 21 21 21 Residence Time Service (Min 15 days)'- Minimum 96 Out of 98 97 98 98 98 98 97 97 96 Temperature Service (Min 95°F) OCSD Plant 2 System Dig.C Dig. D Dig. E Dig.F Dig.G Dig.H Dig.I Dig.J Dig. L Dig. M Dig.N Dig.O Dig. P Dig.Q Dig.R Dig.8 Dig.T Summary Minimum Mean Cell 20 21 20 Out of 20 20 Out of 19 20 21 Out of 21 21 20 20 20 20 21 Residence Time Service Service Service (Min 15 days)•` Minimum 98 99 100 Out of 99 100 Out of 100 101 98 Out of 99 99 100 100 100 99 99 Temperature Service Service Service (Min 95"F) ' Maximum values are reported for metals and nitrogen parameters; minimum values are reported for pH,volatile solids reduction(VSR)and total solids.Analysis of pH is conducted to comply with AAC R18-9-1007(A)(1).The limit for total solids applies only if biosolids are sent to a California landfill, per CCR Title 27 Section 20220(c)(3). "MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach CA Monitoring Period: October 1-31, 2017 Certifications: NPDES permit:I certify, underpenalty of law,that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person orpersons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the information submitted is,to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law,that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. X X James Spears ispeam@ocsd.com Ronald Coss rcoss@ocsd.com Operations Manager (714)593-7081 Lab, Mon.&Compliance Mqr (714)593-7508 Siqned bv.Spears,Jim Signed by Coss,Ronald Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:November 1-30,2017 This notice and necessary information demonstrates compliance with requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 Part 503 and the Arizona Administrative Code Title 18, Chapter 9, Article 10 for land application pollutant concentrations, Class B pathogen reduction via anaerobic digestion (40CFR 503.32(b)(3)(A)(3),AAC R18-9-1006(E)(5)), and vector attraction reduction via volatile solids reduction (40CFR 503.33(b)(1), AAC R18-9-1010(A)(1)). Sampling date(s): 11/01/17(Plant 1 M 1102/17(Plant 2). 11/28/17 Mercury Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Zinc Ammonia Organic Total pH Total ]70 (mg/kgdry) (mg/kg (mg/kgdry) (mg/kgdry) (mg/kgdry) (mg/kgdry) (mg/kg dry) (mg/k9 dry) (mg/kg dry) (mg/k9 dry) Nitrogen Nitrogen Nitrogen Solids dry) (mg/kg dry) (mg'kg dry) (mg'kg dry) (%) Plant 1 0.86 9.5 3.3 41 460 10 DNQ 16 32 9.6 720 6,000 46,000 52,000 8.0 19 Max/Min' Plant 1 Avg 0.75 8.4 3.0 34 410 9.7 DNQ 16 30 7.8 640 6,000 46.000 52,000 19 Plant 2 0.80 8.6 7.2 42 440 12 15 34 8.9 750 5,400 47,000 52,000 7.9 20 Max/Min' Plant 2 Avg 0.78 8.5 6.2 40 420 12 15 32 7.0 720 5,400 44,000 49,000 21 Table 1 57 75 85 3000 4300 840 75 420 100 7500 N/A N/A N/A 6.5 15 38 (Max/Min)' Table 3 17 41 39 N/A 1500 300 N/A 420 100 2800 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I(Avg) OCSD Plant 1 System Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig.10 Dig.11 Dig. 12 Dig. 13 Dig.14 Dig.15 Dig.16 Summary Minimum Mean Cell 18 Out of Out of 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 Residence Time Service Service (Min 15 days)t Minimum 97 Out of Out of 98 98 97 97 98 97 98 98 Temperature Service Service (Min 95'F) OCSD Plant 2 System Dig.C Dig. D Dig.E Dig.F Dig.G Dig.H Dig.I Dig.J Dig.L Dig. M Dig. N Dig.O Dig.P Dig.O Dig.R Dig.S Dig.T Summary Minimum Mean Cell 22 21 20 Out of 21 21 Out of 20 21 21 Out of 21 21 23 21 21 21 363 Residence Time Service Service Service (Min 15 days)2 Minimum 96 98 96 Out of 96 100 Out of 100 101 99 Out of 99 99 99 100 100 100 96 Temperature Service Service Service (Min 95'F) ONO(Detected, Not Quantified)represents estimated values above the method detection limit(MDL),but below the reporting limit(RL). ' Maximum values are reported for metals and nitrogen parameters; minimum values are reported for pH,volatile solids reduction(VSR)and total solids.Analysis of pH is conducted to comply with AAC R18-9-1007(A)(1).The limit for total solids applies only if biosolids are sent to a Calrfomia landfill,per CCR Title 27 Section 20220(c)(3). z MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. 3 Operations intermittently turned off Bow to Digester D due to temperature issues,and ended up taking it out of service for two days at the and of the month. Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach, CA Monitoring Period:November 1-30,2017 Certifications: NPDES permit: I certify,under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B: I certify, under penalty of law, that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. 1/24/2018 1/26/2018 X - x GG-- James Spears jspear@ocsd.com Ronald Coss rcoss@oad.mm Operations Manager (714)593-7081 Lab,Mon.&Compliance Mgr (714)593-7508 Signed by Spear,Jim Signed by:Coss,Ronald Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach CA Monitoring Period:December 1-31,2017 This notice and necessary information demonstrates compliance with requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 Part 503 and the Arizona Administrative Code Title 18, Chapter 9, Article 10 for land application pollutant concentrations, Class B pathogen reduction via anaerobic digestion (40CFR 503.32(b)(3)(A)(3),AAC R18-9-1006(E)(5)), and vector attraction reduction via volatile solids reduction (40CFR 503.33(b)(1), AAC R18-9-1010(A)(1)). Sampling date(s): 12/07117,12/21117 Mercury Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Zinc Ammonia Organic Total pH Total VSR(%) (mg/kg dry) (mg/kg (mg/kg tlry (mg/kg dry) (mglkg dry) (mg/kg (mg/kg dry) (mg/kg (mg/kg dry)(mgtkg dry) Nitrogen Nitrogen Nitrogen Solids dry) dry) dry) (mg/kg dry) (mg/kg dry) (mg/kg dry) (%) Plant 1 0.74 11 3.3 28 390 12 15 29 5.3 ONO 540 6,700 52,000 58,000 7.9 17 60 Max/Min' Plant 1 Avg 0.74 8.9 3.0 27 380 12 14 28 3.0 DNO 520 6,500 50,000 56,000 18 Plant 0.63 12 5.3 41 440 14 16 34 6.6 730 5,300 44,000 49,000 7.9 21 66 Max/Min' Plant 2 Avg 0.34 ONO 10 5.0 39 430 14 15 34 3.6 ONO 660 5,100 43,000 48,000 22 Table 1 57 75 85 3000 4300 840 75 420 100 7500 N/A N/A N/A 6.5 15 38 (Max/Min)' Table 3(Avg) 17 41 39 N/A 1500 300 N/A 420 100 2800 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A OCSD Plant 1 System Dig.7 Dig.8 Dig.9 Dig. 10 Dig.11 Dig. 12 Dig. 13 Dig.14 Dig.15 Dig. 16 Summary Minimum Mean Cell 21 Out of Out of 21 20 21 21 21 21 21 21 Residence Time Service Service (Min 15 days)2 Minimum 95 Outof Outof 98 97 98 98 98 97 97 95 Temperature Service Service (Min 95°F) OCSD Plant 2 System Dig.C Dig.D Dig. E Dig.F Dig.G Dig. H Dig. I Dig.J Dig.L Dig. M Dig. N Dig.O Dig. P Dig.Q Dig. R Dig.S Dig.T Summary Minimum Mean Cell 24 24 25 Out of 23 23 Out of 22 23 24 1193 23 23 22 22 22 22 273 Residence Time Service Service (Min 15 days)� Minimum 95 97 95 Out of 97 97 Out of 100 101 96 98 98 99 98 100 100 98 98 Temperature Service Service (Min 95°F) Biosolids Monthly Compliance Report Facility Name: Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant#1. Fountain Valley. CA and Treatment Plant#2. Huntington Beach C4 . A Monitoring Period:December 1-31,2017 DNQ(Detected, Not Quantified)represents estimated values above the method detection limit(MDL),but below the reporting limit(RL). Maximum values are reported for metals and nitrogen parameters;minimum values are reported for pH,volatile solids reduction(VSR)and total solids.Analysis of pH is conducted to comply with AAC R18-9-1007(A)(1).The limit for total solids applies only if biosolids are sent to a California landfill,per CCR Title 27 Section 20220(c)(3). 2 MCRT based on a 15-Day Rolling Average. a Digester M was put into service on December 27,2017. Digester T was in service,but fed fewer solids for the first half of the month. Certifications: NPDES permit: I certify,under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or the persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. 503 Class B: 1 certify, under penalty of law, that the Class B pathogen requirements in 503.32(b)and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 503.33(b)(1)have been met. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen requirements and vector attraction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Arizona Class B: 1 certify, under penalty of law,that the pollutant analyses and the description of pathogen treatment and vector attraction reduction activities have been made under my direction and supervision and under a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable bioso/ids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. 129/2018 1/30/2018 LY X 1 X L�wz-- James Spears jspears@ocsd.com Ronald Coss rcoss@ocsd.mm Operations Manager (714)593-7081 Lab,Mon.&Compliance Mgr (714)593-7508 Signed by Spears,Jim Signed by:Coss,Ronald APPENDIX B OCSD's Pretreatment Program Annual Report, FY 2016-2017 Solids Management Program, Chapter 9 chapter 9 SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 9.1 INTRODUCTION This section provides an overview of OCSD's Biosolids Program, focusing on the biosolids quality with respect to metals. Biosolids are nutrient-rich, treated organic matter recovered through the treatment of wastewater. These solids are considered a resource because of their nutrient and energy values, and they are recyclable in part because of their low metal content. The pretreatment program is a key element in ensuring the recyclability of OCSD's biosolids by minimizing the discharge of heavy metals and other undesirable constituents into the collection system and ultimately the treated solids,which are used to fertilize farms. OCSD's annual biosolids compliance report was completed, submitted to regulators, and posted online in February.Visit OCSD.cem/503 to access the most recent document that contains Biosolids Program information, regulations,quantities, goals,and how and where biosolids are recycled. 9.2 BIOSOLIDS QUALITY Biosolids quality plays an important role in ensuring the continued recyclability of OCSD's biosolids. OCSD's pretreatment program has been extremely effective in reducing and maintaining levels of pollutants (e.g., OCSD's influent sewage meets drinking water standards for the biosolids monitoring metals). The ceiling concentrations and EQ (exceptional quality) concentrations promulgated by the EPA's biosolids regulations(40 CFR 503)are presented in the figures as a reference. For FY 2016/17, OCSD biosolids met the EQ limits for all the regulated parameters. TABLE 9.1 Trends in Trace Metal Content of Biosolids, Fiscal Years 2008-2017 (Concentration in mg/kg,dry weight) Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2 Fiscal Quality Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg Min. Max Avg. Arsenic 41 2007-08 2.9 9.0 6.2 4.1 14 7.9 2008-09 4.3 12 7.1 3.5 13 9.0 2009-10 2.0 10 5.2 4.4 10 7.2 2010-11 7.2 9.7 8.4 8.6 12 10 2011-12 2.3 11 7.4 6.6 66 22 2012-13 0 7.8 4.7 2.0 10 7.0 2013-14 2.2 9.4 5.4 5.4 11 8.4 2014-15 4.5 11 7.2 7.8 12 9.3 2015-16 3.8 12 8.0 6.2 12 9.2 2016-17 6.7 12 8.1 5.6 12 8.6 9.1 TABLE 9.1 Trends in Trace Metal Content of Biosolids, Fiscal Years 2008-2017 (Concentration in mg/kg, dry weight) Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2 Fiscal Quality Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg. Cadmium 39 2007-08 3.2 11 5.5 2.6 6.4 3.8 2008-09 2.5 6.2 4.1 1.7 4.4 3.0 2009-10 1.1 4.4 2.9 1.0 4.8 2.8 2010-11 1.2 3.8 2.6 1.4 5.0 2.5 2011-12 0.8 6.0 3.8 1.1 4.4 3.6 2012-13 2.6 7.8 4.7 1.9 4.4 3.1 2013-14 1.6 11 3.9 2.1 6.0 3.5 2014-15 2.7 7.8 5.1 3.1 5.8 4.0 2015-16 1.3 4.7 2.5 2.0 4.5 3.0 2016-17 2.6 3.1 2.3 2.0 3.8 3.0 Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2 Fiscal Quality Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg. Chromium " 2007-08 50 62 54 46 77 60 2008-09 44 65 55 42 88 62.3 2009-10 29 56 44 30 54 47 2010-11 41 58 47 50 66 59 2011-12 42 74 52 40 70 56 2012-13 42 56 49 42 59 49 2013-14 39 52 45 40 53 46 2014-15 30 51 40 34 70 46 2015-16 31 89 46 28 60 46 2016-17 30 89 49 29 67 46 Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2 Fiscal Quality Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg- Min. Max. Avg. Copper 1,500 2007-08 500 650 570 460 630 538 2008-09 500 590 560 500 540 523 2009-10 420 620 543 370 560 497 2010-11 520 600 567 500 720 574 2011-12 430 670 518 380 720 522 2012-13 480 640 538 500 640 538 2013-14 460 540 508 470 540 503 2014-15 320 570 468 320 560 469 2015-16 380 560 460 340 570 479 2016-17 400 560 460 340 570 485 9.2 TABLE 9.1 Trends in Trace Metal Content of Biosolids, Fiscal Years 2008-2017 (Concentration in mg/kg, dry weight) Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2 Fiscal Quality Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg. Lead 300 2007-08 6.0 30 20 6.0 24 14 2008-09 11 25 21 6.0 21 15 2009-10 9.0 44 23 9.0 20 17 2010-11 21 24 23 9.0 30 20 2011-12 NO 25 9.0 NO 32 13 2012-13 7.5 19 15 7.5 17 14 2013-14 13 17.5 14 13 17 14 2014-15 8.7 15 13 9.0 17 13 2015-16 8.3 20 12 8.0 17 13 2016-17 7.9 20 11 7.5 17 12 Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2 Fiscal Quality Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg. Mercury 17 2007-08 1.1 4.2 1.9 1.3 2.6 1.6 2008-09 1.0 1.9 1.4 1.0 2.6 1.4 2009-10 1.0 3.2 1.4 0.9 1.6 1.3 2010-11 0.8 2.2 1.3 0.8 2.3 1.2 2011-12 0.8 1.4 1.2 0.8 2.6 1.3 2012-13 0.7 4.1 1.5 0.8 3.8 1.4 2013-14 0.8 1.2 1.0 0.7 2.8 1.4 2014-15 1.0 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.5 1.0 2015-16 0.6 1.7 0.93 0.64 1.2 1.0 2016-17 0.53 1.7 0.90 1 0.70 1.2 0.90 Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2 Fiscal Quality Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg- Min. Max. Avg. Molybdenum ** 2007-08 12 17 13 12 18 15 2008-09 12 16 15 8.0 16 14 2009-10 6.0 16 13 6.0 14 10 2010-11 12 19 15 4.8 18 14 2011-12 6.5 18 13 12 20 17 2012-13 9.8 20 14 12 20 15 2013-14 12 18 15 14 18 15 2014-15 9.4 18 15 12 20 16 2015-16 11 18 15 11 23 16 2016-17 12 18 15 1 11 23 16 9.3 TABLE 9.1 Trends in Trace Metal Content of Biosolids, Fiscal Years 2008-2017 (Concentration in mg/kg, dry weight) Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2 Fiscal Quality Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg. Nickel 420 2007-08 34 58 45 24 56 31 2008-09 30 41 35 22 37 29 2009-10 12 36 28 9 27 21 2010-11 28 46 37 14 38 32 2011-12 15 48 35 20 39 31 2012-13 34 48 40 23 41 30 2013-14 36 55 43 28 56 37 2014-15 26 47 37 26 41 34 2015-16 28 45 38 20 41 33 2016-17 25 45 36 21 41 32 Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2 Fiscal Quality Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg. Selenium 100 2007-08 3.0 14 8.0 1.4 11 5.6 2008-09 2.5 14 9.7 2.8 13 7.5 2009-10 2.7 18 7.3 2.8 16 5.6 2010-11 2.8 26 10.6 3.7 26 9.8 2011-12 ND 26 9.0 ND 19 9.0 2012-13 0 20 9.0 0 20 8.0 2013-14 1.9 13 7.3 2.7 13 7.7 2014-15 2.9 13 6.8 4.0 15 7.0 2015-16 2.4 10 7.7 2.2 10 7.0 2016-17 4.1 10 8.4 4.8 10 8.0 Exceptional Plants Plant Fiscal Quality Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg. Silver 2007-08 19 25 22 10 15 13 2008-09 19 24 21 9.5 13 12 2009-10 10 18 15 7.4 13 10 2010-11 10 17 13 5.2 12 9.6 2011-12 7 14 10 4.0 12 8.5 2012-13 6.2 14 8.6 6.4 13 8.6 2013-14 1.7 7.6 5.7 3.8 9.1 7.0 2014-15 4.9 7.8 6.7 6.0 8.6 7.0 2015-16 4.6 7.7 6.1 4.2 8.0 6.0 2016-17 3.6 7.7 5.7 4.3 7.9 5.7 9.4 TABLE 9.1 Trends in Trace Metal Content of Biosolids, Fiscal Years 2008-2017 (Concentration in mg/kg, dry weight) Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2 Fiscal Quality Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg. Zinc 2,800 2006-07 820 1100 900 720 930 790 2007-08 740 890 806 680 790 716 2008-09 720 870 785 700 800 749 2009-10 560 810 741 520 790 710 2010-11 630 740 696 700 830 740 2011-12 560 880 709 560 910 749 2012-13 640 860 723 680 880 768 2013-14 590 730 671 620 750 700 2014-15 420 720 620 465 740 669 2015-16 500 770 617 520 890 733 2016-17 550 770 614 520 890 737 9.5 60 —Plant No. 1 —Plant No. 2 50 Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant Concentration Limit 41 mg/kg (Feb. 1998) 40 m 9 30 I k 20 9 Concentration less than method detection limit of 59 10 mg/kg limit in 1993 0 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Figure 9-1 Trends in Concentrations of Arsenic in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1992-2017 Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division 45 —Plant No. 1 —Plant No. 2 40 Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids 35 Pollutant Concentration Limit 39 mg/kg(Feb. 1993) 30 m 25 9 / 20 k 15 9 10 5 0 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Figure 9-2 Trends in Concentrations of Cadmium in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1992-2017 Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division 9.6 750 —Plant No. 1 —Plant No. 2 600 There are no biosolids limits for chromium 450 M 9 / 300 k 9 150 0 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Figure 9-3 Trends in Concentrations of Chromium in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1992-2017 Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division 2000 1800 —Plant No. 1 —Plant No. 2 1600 .............................. Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids 1400 Pollutant Concentration Limit 1500 mglkg (Feb. 1993) m 1200 9 1000 / 800 k B 600 400 200 0 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Figure 9.4 Trends in Concentrations of Copper in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1992.2017 Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division 9.7 500 —Plant No. 1 —Plant No. 2 400 Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant Concentration Limit 300 mg/kg(Feb. 1993) 300 ------------------------------- m 9 / 200 k 9 100 0 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Figure 9-5 Trends in Concentrations of Lead in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1992-2017 Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division 40 —Plant No. 1—Plant No.2 35 30 Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant Concentration Limit 17 mg/kg(Feb. 1993) 25 m g 20 ------------------------------ k 15 9 10 5 0 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Figure 9-6 Trends in Concentrations of Mercury in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1992-2017 Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division 9.8 80 ------------------------------ —Plant No. 1 —Plant No. 2 70 60 No Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant Concentration Limit 50 Ceiling Concentration 75 mg/kg (Feb. 1993) m g 40 k 30 9 20 10 0 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Figure 9-7 Trends in Concentrations of Molybdenum in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1992-2017 Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division 450 400 "-""-""-"--"--"--"--"--"--"-- -Plant No. 1 —Plant No.2 350 Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant Concentration Limit and Ceiling Limit 300 420 mg/kg (Feb. 1993) m 250 9 / 200 k 150 9 100 50 0 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Figure 94 Trends in Concentrations of Nickel in Biosolids, Fiscal Years, 1992-2017 Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division 9.9 110 100 ------------------------------- —Plant No. 1 —Plant No.2 90 80 Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant Concentration Limit&Ceiling Limit 70 100 mg/kg m 60 9 50 k 40 9 30 Concentration less than method detection limit of 63 mg/kg limit in 1993 20 10 0 1992 19941996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Figure 9-9 Trends in Concentrations of Selenium in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1992.2017 Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division 4000 —Plant No. 1 —Plant No. 2 3500 Exceptional Quality EPA Biosolids Pollutant Concentration Limit 3000 2800 mg/kg(Feb. 1993) ------------------------------ 2500 m 9 2000 k 1500 9 1000 500 0 1992 19941996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Figure 9-10 Trends in Concentrations of Zinc in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1992-2017 Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division 9.10 APPENDIX C Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Analysis in Biosolids for 2017 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location General Chemistry Ammonia-N SM 4500 NH3 mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 5400 290 1500 G weight Cake 01/11/2017 5500 300 1500 02/01/2017 5100 260 1300 02/08/2017 5200 280 1400 03/01/2017 6200 250 1300 03/08/2017 5200 280 1400 04/05/2017 5100 280 1400 04/12/2017 4900 270 1300 05/03/2017 6200 270 1400 05/10/2017 6300 290 1500 06/07/2017 6600 310 1500 06/14/2017 6500 280 1400 07/06/2017 6000 260 1300 07/12/2017 6200 290 1400 08/02/2017 5500 250 1300 08/09/2017 6700 1290 1500 09/06/2017 5900 1270 1400 09/13/2017 5700 260 1300 10/04/2017 5700 250 1300 10/24/2017 5500 240 1200 11/01/2017 6000 260 1300 11/28/2017 6000 270 1300 12/07/2017 6200 280 1400 12/21/2017 6700 1290 1500 Annual Mean 5800 SM 4500 NH3 mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 4900 1250 1300 G weight Cake 01/11/2017 4700 240 1200 02/02/2017 4400 230 1100 02/08/2017 4900 250 1300 03/01/2017 6100 250 1200 03/O8/2017 4600 250 1200 04/05/2017 4600 240 1200 04/12/2017 4700 260 1300 05/03/2017 5300 250 1200 05/10/2017 5400 240 1200 06J07/2017 5500 240 1200 06/14/2017 5400 250 1200 07/06/2017 5300 240 1200 07/12/2017 5300 240 1200 08/02/2017 5300 240 1200 08/09/2017 5600 240 1200 09/06/2017 5600 250 1300 09/13/2017 5600 250 1200 10/04/2017 5500 240 1200 10/24/2017 5700 240 1200 11/02/2017 5400 230 1100 11/28/2017 5300 250 1200 12/07/2017 5300 240 1200 12/21/2017 4900 230 1100 Annual Mean 5200 Cormsivity EPA 9040C - Plant 1 01/04/2017 NEG — -- Cake Annual Mean NEG EPA 9040C - Plant 2 01/04/2017 NEG — -- Cake Annual Mean NEG Fluoride EPA 300.0 mg/kg dry Plant 1 01J04/2017 31 20 29 weight Cake 07/O6/2017 25 DNQ 19 27 Annual Mean 28 DNQ EPA 300.0 mg/kg dry Plant 2 01J04/2017 30 18 25 weight Cake 07/O6/2017 25 17 24 Annual Mean 28 Henvalent EPA 7196A mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 12 29 Page 1 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location Chromium weight Cake 04/05/2017 ND 28 56 07/06/2017 ND 13 27 10/04/2017 ND 26 51 Annual Mean <28 EPA 7196A mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 10 25 weight Cake 04/05/2017 ND 25 49 07/06/2017 ND 12 24 10/04/2017 ND 25 49 Annual Mean <25 Kjeldahl Nitrogen EPA 351.2 mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 52000 5500 7300 weight Cake 01/11/2017 56000 5600 7500 02/01/2017 55000 4900 6600 02/08/2017 58000 5200 7000 03/01/2017 47000 4700 6300 03/08/2017 52000 5300 7000 04/05/2017 50000 _ 5200 7000 04/12/2017 47000 5000 6700 05/03/2017 58000 5100 6800 05/10/2017 55000 5400 7200 06/07/2017 60000 5800 7700 06/14/2017 53000 5300 7100 07/06/2017 49000 5000 6600 07/12/2017 48000 9900 13000 08/02/2017 46000 8000 11000 08/09/2017 46000 5400 7200 09/06/2017 58000 2700 3500 09/13/2017 50000 3200 4300 10/04/2017 49000 3000 4100 10/24/2017 49000 11000 15000 11/01/2017 51000 6100 8200 11/28/2017 52000 6300 8300 12t07/2017 58000 7100 9500 12/21/2017 54000 10000 13000 Annual Mean 52000 EPA 351.2 mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 51000 4800 6300 weight Cake 01/11/2017 46000 4600 6100 02/02/2017 44000 4300 5700 02/08/2017 52000 4700 6300 03/01/2017 49000 4600 6200 03/08/2017 49000 4600 6100 04/05/2017 45000 4500 6000 04/12/2017 54000 4800 6500 05/03/2017 53000 4600 6100 05/10/2017 50000 4600 6100 06Y07/2017 55000 4600 6100 06/14/2017 50000 4600 6200 07/06/2017 47000 4500 6000 07/12/2017 46000 8300 11000 08/02/2017 34000 1800 2500 08/09/2017 47000 8600 11000 09/06/2017 49000 3000 4000 09/13/2017 51000 3000 4000 10/04/2017 45000 1900 2500 10/24/2017 47000 11000 14000 11/02/2017 52000 4800 6400 11/28/2017 45000 8300 11000 12/07/2017 47000 5500 7300 12/21/2017 49000 7600 10000 Annual Mean 48000 Nitrate-N EPA 300.0 mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 4.7 6.4 weight Cake 07/06/2017 ND 4.3 5.9 07/12/2017 ND 4.7 6.4 Page 2 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample ISample Date Result MDL RL Location 08/02/2017 NO 4.1 5.6 08/09/2017 NO 4.7 6.5 09/06/2017 NO 4.4 6.1 09/13/2017 NO 4.2 5.7 10/04/2017 NO 4.1 5.6 10/24/2017 NO 3.9 5.3 11/01/2017 NO 4.2 5.8 11/28/2017 NO 4.3 5.9 12/07/2017 NO 4.6 6.3 12/21/2017 NO 4.7 6.5 Annual Mean <4.7 EPA 300.0 mg/kgdry Plant 01/04/2017 NO 4.1 5.6 weight (Cake 07/06/20171ND 3.9 5.3 07/12/2017 NO _ 3.9 5.3 O8102/2017 9.6 _ 4.0 5.4 OBY09/2017 NO 4.0 5.4 09/06/2017 NO 4.0 5.5 09/13/2017 NO 4.0 5.4 1 OY04/2017 NO 3.9 5.4 1 OY24/2017 NO 3.9 5.4 11/02/2017 NO 3.7 5.1 11/28/2017 NO 4.0 5.5 12/07/2017 NO 3.8 5.2 12/21/2017 NO 3.7 5.1 Annual Mean 4.3 DNO Nitrite-N EPA 300.0 mg/kg dry Plant 1 07/06/2017 15 5.9 8.0 weight Cake 07/12/2017 8.8 6.4 8.8 0 8/0 212 0 1 7 NO 5.6 7.7 08/09/201711 6.5 8.9 09/06/2017 NO 6.1 8.3 09/13/2017 NO 5.7 7.8 10/04/2017 NO 5.6 7.7 l OY24/2017 NO 5.3 7.3 11/01/2017 NO 5.8 7.9 11/28/2017 18 5.9 8.1 12/07/2017 NO 6.3 8.6 12/21/2017 NO 6.5 8.9 Annual Mean 8.3 DNO EPA 300.0 mg/kg dry Plant 2 07/06/2017 33 5.3 7.3 weight Cake 07/121201711 5.3 7.3 0 8/0 212 0 1 7 NO 5.4 7.4 08/09/2017 NO 5.4 7.4 09/06/2017 NO 5.5 7.5 09/13/2017 NO 5.4 7.4 10/04/2017 NO 5.4 7.3 1 0124/2 01 7 NO 5.4 7.3 11/02/2017 NO 5.1 6.9 11/28/2017 NO 5.5 7.5 12/07/2017 NO 5.2 7.2 12/21/20171 ND 5.1 6.9 Annual Mean 8.1 DNO Organic Lead HML 939-M mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.12 0.30 weight Cake 04/05/2017 ND 0.13 0.31 07/06/2017 NO 0.13 0.33 10/04/201I ND 0.12 0.28 Annual Mean <0.13 HML 939-M mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 NO 0.12 0.28 weight Cake 04/05/2017 NO 0.11 0.27 07/06/2017 NO 0.12 10.30 10/04/2017 NO 10.11 10.27 Annual Mean <0.12 Organic Nitrogen CALC mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 46600 Page 3 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location weight Cake 01/11/2017 50500 - -- 02/01/2017 49900 02/O8/2017 52800 03/01/2017 40800 03/08/2017 46800 04/05/2017 44900 -04/12/2017 42100 -- 05/03/2017 51800 05/10/2017 48700 06/07/2017 53400 06/14/2017 46500 07/06/2017 43000 07/12/2017 42000 08/02/2017 41000 08/09/2017 39000 09/O6/2017 52000 09/13/2017 44000 10/04/2017 43000 10/24/2017 44000 11/01/2017 45000 11/28/2017 46000 12/07/2017 52000 12/21/2017 47000 - -- Annual Mean 46000 CALC mg/kg dry Plant 01/04/201746100 weight Cake 01/11/2017 41300 02/02/2017 39600 02/08/2017 47100 03/01/2017 42900 03/08/2017 44400 04/05/2017 40400 04/12/2017 49300 05/03/2617 47700 05/10/2017 44600 06Y07/2017 49500 O6/14/2017 44600 07/06/2017 42000 07/12/2017 41000 08/02/2017 29000 OBY09/2017 41000 09/O6/2017 43000 09/13/2017 45000 1 OY04/2017 40000 1 OY24/2017 41060 11Y02/2017 47000 - -- 11/28/2017 40000 12/07/2017 42000 12/21/2017 44000 Annual Mean 43000 pH EPA 9045C pH units Plant 1 01/04/2017 8.1 0.10 0.1 Cake 02/01/2017 8.1 0.10 0.1 03/01/26178.0 0.10 0.1 04/05/2017 Z9 0.10 0.1 04/12/2017 8.0 0.10 0.1 05/03/2017 7.7 0.10 0.1 05/10/2017 7.9 0.10 0.1 06/07/2017 8.2 0.10 0.1 06/14/2017 8.0 0.10 0.1 07/06/2017 8.1 0.10 0.1 07/12/2017 8.2 0.10 0.1 08/02/2017 8.1 0.10 0.1 0 1/09/2017 7.8 0.10 0.1 Page 4 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location 09/06/2017 8.2 0.10 0.1 09/13/2017 8.1 0.10 0.1 10/04/2017 8.1 0.10 0.1 11/01/2017 8.2 0.10 0.1 11/28/2017 8.0 0.10 0.1 12/07/2017 7.9 0.10 0.1 12/2l/2017 8.2 0.10 0.1 Annual Mean 8.0 EPA 9045C pH units Plant 01/04/20177.9 10.10 0.1 Cake 02/02/2017 8.2 0.10 0.1 03/01/2017 8.0 0.10 0.1 04/05/2017 8.0 0.10 0.1 04/12/2017 7.9 0.10 0.1 05/03/2017 7.7 0.10 0.1 05/10/2017 8.1 0.10 0.1 06/07/2017 8.1 0.10 0.1 OBY14/2017 8.0 0.10 0.1 07/06/2017 8.1 0.10 0.1 07/12/2017 8.2 0.10 0.1 08/02/2017 8.2 0.10 0.1 08/09/2017 7.8 0.10 0.1 09/06/2017 8.1 0.10 0.1 09/13/2017 8.1 0.10 0.1 10/04/2017 8.0 0.10 0.1 1 V02/2017 8.2 0.10 0.1 11/28/ O117 7.9 0.10 0.1 12/07/2017 7.9 0.10 0.1 12/21/2017 8.1 0.10 0.1 Annual Mean 8.0 Total Cyanide EPA 9014 mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 12.5 2.9 weight Cake 04/OS/2017 ND 12.4 2.8 07/O6/2017 2.7 12.3 2.7 10/24/2017 6.8 12.0 2.4 Annual Mean 3.6 DND EPA 9014 mg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 2.2 2.5 weight Cake 04/05/2017 3.2 2.1 2.5 07/06/2017 3.3 2.1 2.4 10/24/2017 ND 2.1 2.4 Annual Mean 2.7 DND Total Nitrogen CALC mg/kg dry Plant 1 07/06/2017 49000 weight Cake 07/12/2017 48000 OBY02/2017 46000 08/09/2017 46000 09/O6/2017 58000 09/13/2017 50000 10/04/2017 49000 10/24/2017 49000 11/01/2017 51000 11/28/2017 52000 12/07/2017 58000 12/2l/2017 54000 Annual Mew 51000 CALC mg/kg dry Plant 2 07/06/2017 47000 weight Cake 07/12/2017 46000 08/02/2017 34000 08/09/2017 47000 09/06/2017 49000 09/13/2017 51000 10/04/2017 45000 10/24/2017 47000 11/02/2017 52000 11/28/2017 45000 Page 5 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location 12/07/2017 47000 - -- 12/2l/2017 49000 - -- Annual Mean 47000 Total Solids SM 2540G % Plant 1 01/04/2017 17 0.050 0.050 Cake 01/11/2017 17 0.050 0.050 02/01/201719 0.050 0.050 02/08/201718 0.050 0.050 03/01/2017 20 0.050 0.050 03/08/201718 0.050 0.050 04/05/201718 0.050 0.050 04/12/2017 18 0.050 0.050 05/03/201718 0.050 0.050 OS/10/201717 0.050 0.050 06/07/201716 0.050 0.050 06/14/2017 17 0.050 0.050 07/06/201719 0.050 0.050 07/12/2017 17 0.050 0.050 08/021201719 0.050 0.050 08/09/201717 0.050 0.050 09/06/201718 0.050 0.050 09/13/201719 0.050 0.050 10/04/201719 0.050 0.050 10/24/2017 21 0.050 0.050 11/01/201719 0.050 0.050 11/28/201719 0.050 0.050 12/07/201718 0.050 0.050 12/2l/201717 0.050 0.050 Annual Mean 18 SM 254OG % Plant 2 01/04/2017 20 0.050 0.050 Cake 61/11/2017 20 0.050 0.050 02/02/2017 22 0.050 0.050 02/08/2017 20 0.050 0.050 03/01/2017 20 0.050 0.050 03/O8/2017 20 0.050 0.050 04/05/2017 20 0.050 0.050 04/12/2017 19 0.050 0.050 05/03/2017 20 0.050 0.050 05/10/2017 20 0.050 0.050 06Y07/2017 20 0.050 0.050 06/14/2017 20 0.050 0.050 07/O6/2017 21 0.050 0.050 07/12/2017 21 0.050 0.050 08/02/2017 20 0.050 0.050 08/09/2017 20 0.050 0.050 09/06/2017 20 0.050 0.050 09/13/2017 20 0.050 0.050 10/04/2017 20 0.050 0.050 10/24/2017 21 0.050 0.050 11/02/2017 22 0.050 0.050 11/28/2017 20 0.050 0.050 12/07/2017 21 0.050 0.050 12/21/2017 22 0.050 0.050 Annual Mean 20 Trace Elements Antimony EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 5.1 DNC1 1.8 12 weight Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1.7 11 07/06/2017 ND 1.6 11 10/04/2017 ND 5.1 10 Annual Mean 3.4 DNC1 EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 4.6 DNC1 1.5 10 weight (Cake 04/05/2017 2.6 DNC1 1.5 9.8 07/06/2017 ND 1.5 9.7 Page 6 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location 10/04/2017 ND 4.9 9.8 Annual Mean 3.4 DNQ Arsenic EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 10 1.5 1.8 weight Cake 01/11/2017 9.4 1.6 1.8 02/01/2017 8.5 1.4 1.6 02/08/201716 3.0 16 03/01/2017 14 DNQ 2.8 15 03/08/2017 7.5 1.5 1.7 04/05/2017 7.5 1.5 1.7 04/12/2017 6.3 1.4 1.6 05/03/2017 7.4 1.4 1.7 05/10/2017 9.1 1.5 1.8 06J07/2O 7 8.8 1.6 1.9 06/14/2017 Z9 1.5 1.7 07/06/2017 7.4 1.4 1.6 07/12/2017 6.9 1.5 1.7 08/02/2017 7.9 1.3 1.5 08/09/2017 8.0 1.5 1.8 09/06/2017 7.5 1.4 1.7 09/13/2017 6.9 1.4 1.6 10/04/2017 6.1 2.6 5.1 10/24/2017 9.3 2.4 4.8 11/01/20179.5 2.6 5.3 11/28/2017 7.2 2.7 5.4 12/07/2017 6.8 2.8 5.7 12/2l/201711 0.65 3.5 Annual Mean 8.6 DNQ EPA 6010B mg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 9.1 1.3 1.5 weight (Cake 01/11/2017 8.3 1.3 1.5 02/02/2017 8.7 1.2 1.4 02/08/201718 2.8 15 03/01/201716 2.7 15 03/08/2017 7.9 1.3 1.5 04/05/2017 9.1 1.3 1.5 04/12/2017 8.4 1.3 1.5 05/03/2017 8.6 1.3 1.5 OS/10/2017 9.3 1.3 1.5 06/07/2017 10 1.3 1.5 06/14/2017 5.8 1.3 1.5 07/06/2017 7.8 1.3 1.5 07/1 J2217 9.6 1.3 1.4 08/02/2017 10 1.3 1.5 08/09/2017 12 1.3 1.5 09/06/2017 8.1 1.3 1.5 09/13/2017 11 1.3 1.5 10/04/2017 6.8 14 4.9 10/24/201710 2.4 4.8 11/02/2017 8.6 2.3 4.6 11/28/2017 8.4 2.5 5.0 12/07/2017 8.5 2.4 4.8 12/2l/201712 0.50 2.7 Annual Mean 9.7 Barium EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 450 1.8 5.9 weight Cake 04/05/2017 360 1.7 5.7 07/O6/2017 420 1.6 5.3 10/04/2017 360 2.6 5.1 Annual Mean 400 EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 910 1.5 5.1 weight Cake 04/05/2017 840 1.5 4.9 07/06/2017 820 1.5 4.9 10/04/2017 710 2.4 4.9 Annual Mean 820 Page 7 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosclids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample (Sample Date (Result MDL RL Location Beryllium EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.23 0.59 weight Cake 04/05/2017 ND 0.23 0.57 07/06/2017 ND 0.21 0.53 10/04/2017 0.33 DNQ 0.26 0.51 Annual Mean 0.25 DNQ EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.20 0.51 weight Cake 04/05/2017 0.33 DNQ 0.20 0.49 07/06/2017 ND 0.19 0.49 l OY04/2017 0.59 0.24 _ 0.49 Annual Mean 0.33 DNQ Cadmium EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 4.2 0.47 1.2 weight Cake 01/11/2017 3.7 0.48 1.2 02/01/2017 4.9 0.43 1.1 02/08/2017 6.0 0.14 2.7 03/01/2017 4.6 0.12 2.5 03/08/2017 4.3 0.45 1.1 04/05/2017 3.5 0.45 1.1 04/12120173.7 0.43 1.1_ 05/03/2017 4.5 0.44 1.1 05/10/2017 3.9 0.47 1.2 06Y07/2017 3.3 0.50 1.2 06/14/2017 3.2 0.46 1.1 07/06/2017 5.2 0.43 1.1 07/12/2017 3.6 0.47 1.2 08/02/2017 3.7 0.41 1.0 08/09/2017 3.5 0.47 1.2 09/06/2017 3.6 0.44 1.1 09/13/2017 4.1 0.42 1.0 10/04/2017 3.3 0.51 1.0 10/24/2017 2.5 0.48 0.97 11/01/20173.3 0.53 1.1 11/28/2017 2.7 0.54 1.1 12/07/2017 2.7 0.57 1.1 12/2l/2017 3.3 0.029 0.59 Annual Mean 3.8 EPA 6010B mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 6.6 0.41 1.0 weight (Cake 01/11/2017 5.7 0.39 0.98 02/02/2017 5.4 0.37 0.93 02/08/2017 6.1 0.12 2.5 03/01/2017 7.2 0.12 2.5 03/08/2017 5.7 0.40 0.99 04/05/2017 5.6 0.39 0.98 04/12/2017 4.6 0.41 1.0 05/03/2017 5.8 0.40 1.0 OS/10/2017 4.7 0.39 0.98 06/07/2017 4.7 0.39 0.98 O6/14/2017 3.9 0.40 0.99 07/O6/2017 5.1 0.39 0.97 07/12/2017 3.8 0.38 0.96 0&0212017 7.5 0.39 0.98 08/09/2017 7.9 0.39 0.99 09/06/2017 5.5 0.40 1.0 09/13/2017 5.4 0.40 0.99 10/04/2017 5.9 0.49 0.98 10/24/2017 5.9 0.48 0.97 11/02/2017 7.2 0.46 0.93 11/28/2017 5.2 0.50 0.99 12/07/2017 5.3 0.48 0.96 12/21/2017 4.6 0.022 0.46 Annual Mean 5.6 Chromium EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 37 0.47 4.7 weight Cake 01/11/2017 35 0.48 4.8_ Page 8 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location 02/01/2017 32 0.43 4.3 02/08/2017 42 1.2 11 03/01/2017 40 1.1 10 03/08/2017 42 0.45 4.5 04/05/2017 34 0.45 4.5 04/12/2017 33 0.43 4.3 05/03/2017 31 0.44 4.4 05/10/2017 29 0.47 4.7 06/07/2017 35 0.50 5.0 06/14/2017 35 0.46 4.6 07/06/2017 35 0.43 4.3 07/12/2017 37 0.47 4.7 08/02/2017 34 0.41 4.1 08/09/2017 34 0.47 4.7 09/06/2017 36 0.44 4.4 09/13/2017 37 0.42 4.2 10/04/2017 32 2.0_ 4.1 10/24/2017 34 1.9 3.9 11/01/2017 41 2.1 4.2 11/28/2017 27 2.1 4.3 12/07/2017 26 2.3 4.6 12/2l/2017 28 0.25 2.4 Annual Mean 34 EPA 6010B mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 39 0.41 4.1 weight Cake 01/11/2017 38 0.39 3.9 02/02/2017 35 0.37 3.7 02/08/2017 50 1.1 10 03/01/2017 46 1.1 9.8 03/08/2017 42 0.40 4.0 04/05/2017 39 0.39 3.9 04/12/2017 34 0.41 4.1 05Y03/2017 39 0.40 4.0 05/10/2017 32 0.39 3.9 06/07/2017 41 0.39 3.9 06/14/2017 37 0.40 4.0 07/06/2017 58 0.39 3.9 07/12/2017 48 0.38 3.8 08/02/2017 50 0.39 3.9 08/09/2017 56 0.39 3.9 09/06/2017 45 0.40 4.0 09/13/2017 47 0.40 4.0 10/04/2017 37 2.0 3.9 10/24/2017 39 1.9 3.9 11/02/2017 42 1.9_ 3.7 11/20617 37 2.0 4.0 12/07/2017 41 1.9 3.8 12/2l/2017 37 0.20 1.8 Annual Mean 42 Cobalt EPA 6010B mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 10.59 15.9 weight Cake 04/05/2017 ND 0.57 5.7 07/O6/2017 2.3 DND 0.53 5.3 10/04/2017 ND 12.6 5.1 Annual Mean 1.5 DND EPA 6010B mg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 10.51 5.1 weight Cake 04/05/2017 ND 0.49 4.9 07/06/2017 2.4 DNC1 0.49 4.9 l OY04/2017 ND 2.4 4.9 Annual Mean 1.4 DNC1 Copper EPA 6010B mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 - 1 0.70 2.9 weight Cake 01/11/2017 400 0.72 3.0 02/01/2017 380 0.64 2.7 02/08/2017 490 2.4 14 Page 9 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location 03/01/2017 420 2.2 12 03/08/2017 470 0.67 2.8 04/OS/2017 410 0.68 2.8 04/12/2017 400 0.65 2.7 06/03/2017 440 0.66 2.8 05/10/2017 380 0.70 2.9 06Y07/2017 410 0.75 3.1 06/14/2017 450 0.69 2.9 07/O6/2017 420 0.64 2.7 07/12/2017 430 0.70 2.9 08/02/2017 440 0.61 2.6 08/09/2017 450 611 2.9 09/06/2017 430 0.66 2.8 09/13/2017 460 0.63 2.6 10/04/2017 420 1.3 2.6 10/24/2017 380 1.2 2.4 11/01/2017460 1.3 2.6 11/28/2017 350 1.3 2.7 12/07/2017 370 _ 1.4 2.8 12/2l/2017 390 0.52 2.9 Annual Mean 420 EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 460 0.61 2.5 weight Cake 01/11/2017 430 0.59 2.4 02/02/2017 410 10.56 2.3 02/08/2017 500 2.2 13 03/01/2017 340 2.2 12 03/O8/2017 450 0.60 2.5 04/05/2017 460 0.59 2.5 04/12/2017 420 0.62 2.6 05/03/2017 520 0.60 2.5 05/10/2017 410 0.59 2.4 06/07/2017 460 0.59 2.5 OBY14/2017 410 0.60 2.5 07/06/2017 460 0.58 2.4 07/12/2017 490 0.58 2.4 08/02/2017 540 0.59 2.5 08/09/2017 630 0.59 2.5 09/06/2017 450 0.61 2.5 09/13/2017 500 0.59 2.5 10/04/2017 430 1.2 2.4 l OY24/2017 400 1.2 2.4 11/02/2017 440 1.2 2.3 11/28/2017 400 1.2 2.5 12/07/2017 440 1.2 2.4 12/2l/2017 420 0.40 2.3 Annual Mean 450 Iron EPA 6010B mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 75000 2.9 35 weight Cake 01/11/2017 63000 3.0 36 02/01/2017 62000 2.7 32 02/08/2017 78000 12 55 03/01/2017 67000 11 51 03/O8/2017 76000 2.8 34 04/05/2017 61000 2.8 34 04/12/2017 62000 2.7 33 05/03/2017 75000 2.8 33 05/10/2017 62000 2.9 35 06/07/2017 63000 3.1 37 06/14/2017 65000 2.9 34 07/06/2017 68000 2.7 32 07/12/2017 62000 2.9 35 08/02/2017 67000 2.6 31 08/09/2017 65000 2.9 35 Page 10 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date 'Result MDL RL Location 09/06/2017 61000 2.8 33 09/13/2017 71000 12.6 31 10/04/2017 56000 15 31 10/24/2017 52000 14 29 11/01/201768000 116 32 11/28/2017 50000 16 32 12/07/2017 51000 17 34 12/21/2017 48000 2.6 12 Annual Mean 64000 EPA 6010B mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 75000 2.5 31 weight Cake 01/11/2017 67000 2.4 29 02/02/2017 59000 2.3 28 02/08/2017 73000 11 51 03/01/2017 65000 11 49 03/08/2017 67000 2.5 30 04/05/2017 63000 2.5 29 04/12/2017 57000 2.6 31 05/03/2017 69000 2.5 30 05/10/2017 58000 2.4 29 06/07/2017 64000 2.5 29 06/14/2017 58000 2.5 30 07/06/2017 64000 2.4 29 07/12/2017 65000 2.4 29 08/02/2017 71000 2.5 29 08/09/2017 82000 2.5 30 09/06/2017 68000 2.5 30 09/13/2017 73000 2.5 30 10/04/2017 61000 15 29 10/24/2017 59000 15 29 11/02/2017 70000 14 28 1 V28/2017 63000 15 30 12/07/2017 69000 14 29 12/2l/2017 70000 10 45 Annual Mean 66000 Lead EPA 6010B mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 10 DNQ 0.94 12 weight Cake 01/11/2017 8.3 DNQ 0.96 12 02/01/2017 11 0.85 11 02/08/201714 0.75 5.5 03/01/201713 0.69 5.1 03/08/201713 0.90 11 04/05/2017 10 DNQ 0.91 11 04/12/2017 11 0.87 11 05/03/2017 11 0.88 11 05/10/2617 7.0 DNQ 0.93 12 06Y07/2017 9.4 DNQ 1.0 12 06/14/201712 0.92 11 07/06/2017 8.4 DNQ 0.85 11 07/12/2017 12 0.93 12 08/02/2017 11 0.82 10 08/09/2017 10 DNQ 0.94 12 09/06/2017 9.7 DNQ 0.88 11 09113/201713 0.84 10 10/04/2017 11 5.1 10 10124/201710 4.8 9.7 11/01/201710 DNQ 5.3 11 11/28/2017 9.3 DNQ 5.4 11 12/07/2017 11 it 11 12/21/201712 1.2 Annual Mean 11 DNQ EPA 6010B mg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 12 10 weight Cake 01/11/201711 9.8 02t02/201713 9.3 Page 11 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location 02/08/201716 0.70 5.1 03/01/201713 0.67 4.9 03/08/201711 0.79 9.9 04/05/201711 0.78 9.8 04/12/2017 10 0.83 10 05/03/201713 0.80 10 05/10/2017 9.3 DNQ 0.78 9.8 06/07/201713 0.78 9.8 OBY14/201712 0.79 9.9 07/06/2017 9.8 0.78 9.7 07/121201711 0.77 9.6 08/021201714 0.78 9.8 08/09/201715 0.79 9.9 09/06/201712 0.81 10 09/13/201714 0.79 9.9 10/04/201712 4.9 9.8 l OY24/201712 4.8 9.7 11/02/2017 11 4.6 9.3 11/28/2017 12 5.0 9.9 12/07/201713 4.8 9.6 12/2l/201714 0.12 0.91 Annual Mean 12 DNQ _ Magnesium EPA 6010B mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 5500 5.9 59_ weight Cake 01/11/2017 4300 6.0 60 02/01/2017 4000 5.3 53 02/08/2017 5100 18 140 03/01/2017 4500 17 130 03/O8/2017 4700 5.6 56 04/05/2017 4300 5.7 57 04/12/2017 4400 5.4 54 05/03/2017 5300 15.5 55 05/10/2017 4400 5.8 58 06/07/2017 5000 6.2 62 06/14/2017 5300 5.7 57 07/06/2017 6300 5.3 53 07/12/2017 5800 5.8 58 08/02/2017 6700 5.1 51 08/09/2017 6300 5.9 59 09/06/2017 5900 5.5 55 09/13/2017 6900 5.2 52 10/04/2017 5700 26 51 10/24/2017 1 5700 24 48 11/01/2017 7200 26 53 11/28/2017 5600 27 54 12/07/2017 6000 28 57 12/21/20176500 3.9 29 Annual Mean 5500 EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 2 01Y04/2017 6800 5.1 51 weight Cake 01/11/2017 6600 4.9 49 02/02/2017 6500 4.6 46 02/08/2017 8000 17 130 03/01/2017 7400 16 120 03/08/2017 6900 5.0 50 04/05/2017 6600 4.9 49 04/12/2017 6100 5.2 52 05Y03/2017 7200 5.0 50 05/10/2017 5900 4.9 49 06/07/2017 7000 4.9 49 06/14/2017 6500 5.0 50 07/06/2017 8600 4.9 49 07/12/2017 8600 4.8 48 08/02/2017 8700 4.9 49 Page 12 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location _ 08/09/2017 8900 4.9 49 09/06/2017 6700 5.0 50 09/13/2017 7100 4.9 49 10/04/2017 6500 24 49 10/24/2017 6300 24 48 11/02/2017 7700 23 46 11/28/2017 6800 25 50 12/07/2017 7200 24 48 12/2l/2017 6800 3.1 23 Annual Mean 7100 Mercury EPA 7471A mg/kg dry Plants 01/04/20170.88 0.071 0.12 weight Cake 01/11/20171.1 0.071 0.12 02/01/20171.3 0.064 0.11 02/08/2017 0.99 0.066 0.11 03/01/2017 0.65 0.060 0.10 03/08/2017 0.73 0.066 0.11 04/05/2017 2.0 0.068 0.11 04/12/2017 0.72 0.067 0.11 05/03/20171.2 0.065 0.11 05/10/20171.2 0.14 0.23 06Y07/2017 0.69 0.075 0.12 06/14/2017 0.63 0.069 0.12 07/06/2017 0.74 0.064 0.11 07/12120171.1 0.068 0.11 08/02/2017 0.92 0.062 0.10 08/09/2017 0.64 10.070 0.12 09/06/2017 0.97 10.067 0.11 09113/20171.0 0.062 0.10 10/04/20171.3 0.060 0.10 10/24/2017 0.80 0.058 0.097 11/01/20170.64 0.064 0.11 11/28/2017 0.86 0.32 0.53 12/07/2017 0.74 0.067 0.11 12/2l/2017 0.73 0.071 10.12 Annual Mean 0.94 EPA 7471A mg/kg dry Plant 01/04/20171.0 0.060 0.10 weight (Cake 01/11/2017 0.52 0.059 0.098 02/02/2017 0.76 0.055 0.091 02/08/2017 0.67 10.060 0.10 03/01/2017 0.75 10.059 0.098 03/0B/2017 0.72 10.060 0.099 04/05/2017 0.53 0.059 0.098 04/12/2017 0.73 0.061 0.10 05/03/2017 0.68 0.059 0.098 OS/10/2017 0.61 0.12 0.20 06/07/2017 0.84 0.059 0.098 06/14/2017 0.68 0.060 0.099 07/06/2017 0.82 0.057 0.095 07/12/2017 0.70 0.057 0.095 08/02/2017 0.73 0.058 0.096 08/09/2017 1.1 0.061 0.10 09/06/2017 0.91 0.061 0.10 09/13/20171.2 0.061 0.10 10/04/ O117 691 0.059 0.096 10/24/2017 0.71 0.057 0.095 11/02/2017 0.80 0.056 0.093 11/28/2017 0.76 0.29 0.49 12/07/2017 ND 0.057 0.094 12/21/2017 0.63 0.054 0.090 Annual Mean 0.74 DNQ Molybdenum EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 14 10.47 5.9 weight Cake 01/11/2017 14 0.48 6.0 Page 13 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location 02/01/201714 0.43 5.3 02/08/201718 0.31 11 03/01/201716 0.29 10 03/08/201715 0.45 5.6 04/05/201712 0.45 5.7 04/121201715 0.43 5.4 05/03/201715 0.44 5.5 05/10/201714 0.47 5.8 06/07/201714 0.50 6.2 06/14/201715 0.46 5.7 07106/201715 0.43 5.3 07/12/201713 0.47 5.8 08/021201714 0.41 5.1 08/09/201715 0.47 5.9 09/06/201714 0.44 5.5 09/13/201715 0.42 5.2 10/04/201714 2.6 5.1 10/24/201713 2.4 4.8 11/01/2017 16 2.6 5.3 11/28/2017 15 2.7 5.4 12/07/201715 2.8 5.7 12/2l/201712 0.067 2.4 Annual Mean 14 EPA 6010B mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 14 0.41 5.1 weight Cake 01/11/2017 13 0.39 4.9 02/021201713 0.37 4.6 02/08/201717 0.29 10 03/01/201717 0.28 9.8 0=8/201715 0.40 5.0 04/05/201716 0.39 4.9 04/12/2017 13 0.41 5.2 05Y03/201715 0.40 5.0 05/10/201713 0.39 4.9 06Y07/201714 0.39 4.9 06/14/201713 0.40 5.0 07/06/201714 0.39 4.9 07/121201715 0.38 4.8 08/021201717 0.39 4.9 08/09/201719 0.39 4.9 09/06/201714 0.40 5.0 09/13/201716 0.40 4.9 10/04/201714 2.4 4.9 10/24/201714 2.4 4.8 11/021201715 2.3 4.6 11/28/201715 2.5 5.0 12/07/201716 2.4 4.8 12/2l/201713 0.052 1.8 Annual Mean 15 Nickel EPA 6010B mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 28 0.47 12 weight Cake 01/11/2017 28 0.48 12 02/01/2017 29 0.43 11 02/08/2017 41 0.99 11 03/01/2017 40 0.91 10 03/08/2017 37 0.45 11 04/05/2017 31 0.45 11 04/12/2017 29 0.43 11 05/03/2017 24 0.44 11 05/10/2017 25 0.47 12 06Y07/2017 32 0.50 12 06/14/2017 32 0.46 11 07/06/2017 34 0.43 11 07/12/2017 33 0.47 12 Page 14 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample ISample Date Result MDL RL Location 08/02/2017 32 0.41 10 08/09/2017 35 0.47 12 09/06/2017 32 0.44 11 09/13/2017 32 0.42 10 10/04/2017 31 5.1 10 10/24/2017 25 4.8 9.7 11/01/2017 32 5.3 11 11/28/2017 28 5.4 11 12/07/2017 26 5.7 11 12/21/2017 29 0.21 2.4 Annual Mean 31 EPA 6010B mg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 24 10.41 10 weight (Cake 01/11/2017 26 0.39 9.8 02/02/2017 24 0.37 9.3 62/06/2017 32 0.91 10 63/61/2017 39 0.88 9.8 03/O8/2017 29 0.40 9.9 04/05/2017 31 0.39 9.8 04/12/2017 29 0.41 10 05/03/2017 27 0.40 10 OS/10/2017 24 0.39 9.8 06/07/2017 35 0.39 9.8 06/14/2017 32 0.40 9.9 07/06/2017 34 0.39 9.7 07/12/2017 31 0.38 9.6 08/02/2017 35 0.39 9.8 08/09/2017 41 0.39 9.9 09/06/2017 35 0.40 10 09/13/2017 37 0.40 9.9 10/04/2017 32 4.9 9.8 10/24/2017 29 4.8 9.7 11/02/2017 34 4.6 9.3 11/28/2017 30 5.0 9.9 12/07/2017 33 4.8 9.6 12/2l/2017 34 0.16 1.8 Annual Mean 32 Potassium EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 1100 35 290 weight Cake Annual Mean 1100 EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 1100 31 250 weight Cake Annual Mean 1100 Selenium EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 4.9 1.9 2.9 weight Cake 01/11/2017 4.4 1.9 3.0 02/01/2017 8.1 1.7 2.7 02/08/2017 ND 3.1 27 03/01/2017 ND 2.8 25 03/08/201712 1.8 2.8 04/05/2017 5.8 1.8 2.8 04/12/2017 5.9 1.7 2.7 05/03/201712 1.8 2.8 05/10/2017 9.0 1.9 2.9 06Y07/2017 6.0 2.0 3.1 O6/14/2017 8.0 1.8 2.9 07/06/2017 6.5 1.7 2.7 07/12/2017 5.9 1.9 2.9 OBY02/2017 5.7 1.6 2.6 08/09/2017 5.9 1.9 2.9 09/06/2017 7.8 1.8 2.8 09/13/2017 7.4 1.7 2.6 10/04/2017 5.1 2.6 5.1 10/24/2017 6.8 2.4 4.8 11/01/2017 9.6 2.6 5.3 11/28/20176.0 2.7 5.4 Page 15 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location 12/07/2017 5.3 DNC! 2.8 5.7 12/21/2017 ND 0.66 5.9 Annual Mean 6.4 DNO EPA 6010B mg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 4.5 1.6 2.5 weight (Cake 01/11/2017 1.6 DND 1.6 2.4 02/02/2017 4.9 1.5 2.3 02/08/2017 ND 12.8 25 03/01/2017 ND 12.8 25 03/08/2017 8.2 1.6 2.5 04/05/2017 5.2 1.6 2.5 04/12/2017 5.3 1.7 2.6 05/03/2017 6.5 1.6 2.5 OS/10/2017 8.2 1.6 2.4 06/07/2017 7.0 1.6 2.5 06/14/2017 8.9 1.6 2.5 07/06/2017 6.0 1.6 2.4 07/12/2017 9.7 1.5 2.4 08/02/2017 5.9 1.6 2.5 08/09/2017 5.5 1.6 2.5 09/06/2017 7.9 1.6 2.5 09/13/2017 7.5 1.6 2.5 10/04/2017 5.3 2.4 4.9 10/24/2017 5.9 2.4 4.8 11/02/2017 8.9 2.3 4.6 11/28/2017 5.1 2.5 5.0 12/07/2017 6.6 2.4 4.8 12/2l/2017 ND 0.51 4.6 Annual Mean 5.9 DND Silver EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 5.7 1.5 1.8 weight Cake 01/11/2017 5.1 1.5 1.8 02/01/2017 5.4 1.3 1.6 02/08/2017 4.7 DND 0.78 14 03/01/2017 4.2 DND 0.71 13 03/O8/2017 4.8 1.4 1.7 04/05/2017 4.2 1.4 1.7 04/12/2017 4.2 1.4 1.6 05/03/2017 4.4 1.4 1.7 05/10/2017 4.8 1.5 1.8 06/07/2017 3.7 1.6 1.9 06/14/2017 3.5 1.4 1.7 07/O6/2017 3.7 1.3 1.6 10/04/2017 4.1 0.77 1.5 1 /2 /2017 3. 0. 1.4 11/28/2017 3.77 0.8080 1.6 12/07/2017 3.8 0.85 1.7 12/2l/2017 2.9 0.17 2.9 Annual Mean 4.3 DND EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 5.2 1.3 1.5 weight Cake 01/11/2017 4.8 1.2 1.5 02/02/2017 5.5 1.2 1.4 02/08/2017 5.0 DND 0.72 13 03/01/2017 4.6 DND 10.69 12 03/08/2017 5.0 1.2 1.5 04/05/2017 5.2 1.2 1.5 04/12/2017 5.3 1.3 1.5 05Y03/2017 5.2 1.2 1.5 05/10/2017 5.5 1.2 1.5 06Y07/2017 4.7 1.2 1.5 06/14/2017 3.6 1.2 1.5 07/O6/2017 4.1 1.2 1.5 1 OY04/2017 4.4 0.73 1.5 1 OY24/2017 4.2 0.73 1.5 Page 16 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location 11/28/2017 4.2 0.74 1.5 12/07/2017 4.5 0.72 1.4 12/21/2017 3.5 0.13 2.3 Annual Mean 4.7 DNC1 Thallium EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 1.2 18 weight Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1.1 17 07/06/2017 ND 1.1 16 10/04/2017 ND 7.7 15 Annual Mean <7.7 EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 1.0 15 weight Cake 04/05/2017 ND 0.98 15 07/06/2017 ND 0.97 15 10/04/2017 ND 7.3 15 Annual Mean <7.3 Total Phosphorus EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 28000 47 94 weight Cake Annual Mean 28000 EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 26000 41 181 weight Cake Annual Mean 26000 Vanadium EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 27 0.59 5.9 weight Cake 04/05/2017 23 0.57 5.7 07/06/2017 24 0.53 5.3 10/04/2017 20 2.6 5.1 Annual Mean 24 EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 53 0.51 5.1 weight Cake 04/05/2017 44 0.49 4.9 07/06/2017 53 0.49 4.9 10/04/2017 51 2.4 4.9 Annual Mean 50 Zinc EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 670 1.4 4.7 weight Cake 01/11/2017 600 1.4 4.8 02/01/2017 560 1.3 4.3 02/08/2017 730 19.5 27 03/01/2017 680 8.7 25 03/O8/2017 680 1.3 4.5 04/05/2017 580 1.4_ 4.5 04/12/2017 580 1.3 4.3 05/03/2017 630 1.3 4.4 05/10/2017 550 1.4 4.7 06Y07/2017 600 1.5 5.0 06/14/2017 600 1.4 4.6 07/06/2017 640 1.3 4.3 07/12/2017 650 1.4 4.7 08/02/201 677 0 1.2 4.1 08/09/2017 660 1.4 4.7 09/06/2017 660 1.3 4.4 09/13/2017 690 1.3 4.2 10/04/2017 630 3.8 7.7 10/24/2017 590 3.6 7.2 11/01/2017720 4.0 7.9 11/28/2017 550 4.0 8.0 12/07/2017 540 4.3 8.5 12/21/2017 490 2.0 5.9 Annual Mean 620 EPA 601 OB mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 760 1.2 4.1 weight Cake 01/11/2017 720 11.2 3.9 02/02/2017 640 1.1 3.7 02/08/2017 800 8.8 25 03/01/20171000 8.5 25 03/O8/2017 700 1.2 4.0 04/05/2017 730 1.2 3.9 04/12/2017 680 1.2 4.1 05/03/2017 840 1.2 4.0 Page 17 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location 05/10/2017 680 1.2 3.9 06Y07/2017 730 1.2 3.9 06/14/2017 660 1.2 4.0 07/06/2017 750 1.2 3.9 07/12/2017 710 1.2 3.8 08/02/2017 860 1.2 3.9 08/09/2017 960 1.2 3.9 09/06/2017 750 1.2 4.0 09/13/2017 810 1.2 4.0 10/04/2017 700 3.7 7.3 10/24/2017 700 3.6 7.3 11/02/2017 750 3.5 7.0 11/28/2017 690 3.7 7.4 12/07/2017 730 3.6 7.2 12/2l/2017 580 1.6 4.6 Annual Mean 750 TCLP-Trace Elements Arsenic EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.070 0.20 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.070 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.070 0.20 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.070 Barium EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 0.17 DNQ 0.060 0.20 TCLP Cake Annual Mean 0.17 DNQ EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01104/20170.27 0.060 0.20 TCLP Cake Annual Mean 0.27 Cadmium EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01Y04/2017 ND 0.020 0.10 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.020 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.020 0.10 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.020 Chromium EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.020 0.10 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.020 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.020 0.10 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.020 Lead EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01Y04/2017 ND 0.040 0.10 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.040 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.040 0.10 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.040 Mercury EPA 7470A- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0010 0.0026 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.0010 EPA 7470A- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0010 0.0020 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.0010 Selenium EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01Y04/2017 ND 0.080 0.10 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.080 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.080 0.10 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.080 Silver EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.060 0.20 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.060 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.060 0.20 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.060 STLC-Trace Elements Antimony EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.14 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.14 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.14 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.14 Arsenic EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.13 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.13 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.13 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.13 Barium EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01Y04/2017 7.2 10.12 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean 7.2 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/201718 0.12 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean 118 Page 18 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample (Sample Date (Result MDL RL Location Beryllium EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.018 0.080 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.018 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.018 0.080 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.018 Cadmium EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.040 0.10 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.040 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.040 0.10 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.040 Chromium EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 0.44 0.040 0.10 STLC Cake Annual Mean 0.44 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/20170.55 0.040 0.10 STLC Cake Annual Mean 0.55 Cobalt EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.040 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.040 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.040 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.040 Copper EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.060 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.060 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.060 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.060 Lead EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.080 0.10 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.080 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.080 0.10 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.080 Mercury EPA 7470A- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.0010 0.0020 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.0010 EPA 7470A- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0010 0.0020 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.0010 Molybdenum EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 0.15 DNQ 0.040 0.40 STLC Cake Annual Mean 0.15 DNQ EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 2 01/04/2017 0.060 DNO 0.040 0.40 STLC Cake Annual Mean 0.060 DNO Nickel EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 0.35 0.040 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean 0.35 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/20170.31 0.040 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean 0.31 Selenium EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.16 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.16 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.16 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.16 Silver EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.12 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.12 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.12 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.12 Thallium EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.16 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.16 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.16 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean <0.16 Vanadium EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 0.48 0.060 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean 0.48 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/20170.94 0.060 0.20 STLC Cake Annual Mean 0.94 Zinc EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 6.2 0.18 0.40 STLC Cake Annual Mean 6.2 EPA 6010B- mg/L Plant 01/04/20172.9 0.18 0.40 STLC Cake Annual Mean 2.9 Volatile Organic Compounds 1,1,1,2- EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plants 01/04/2017 NO 28 140 Tetrachlomethane Cake 04/05/2017 NO 1100 2800 07/06/2017 NO 25 130 1 CY04/2017 NO 24 120 Annual Mean <1100 Page 19 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample ISample Date (Result MDL RL Location EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 25 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2400 07/06/2017 ND 24 120 10/04/2017 ND 23 120 Annual Mean <980 1,1,1- EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Trichloroethane Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/O6/2017 ND 125 51 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01Y04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/O6/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 1,1,2,2- EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Tetrachloroethane Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/06/2017 ND 25 51 10/04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/O6/2017 ND 24 48_ 10/04/2017 ND 23 47_ Annual Mean <490 _ 1,1,2- EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57_ Trichloroethane Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/06/2017 ND 25 51 10/04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/06/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 1,1-Dichloroethane EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/06/2017 ND 25 51 10/04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/06/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 1,1-Dichloroethene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND _ 28 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/O6/2017 ND 25 130 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 25 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2400 07/O6/2017 ND 24 120 10/04/2017 ND 23 120 Annual Mean <980 1,1-Dichloropropene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57_ Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/O6/2017 ND 25 51 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01Y04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 Page 20 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location I 1 1 07/06/2017 ND 24 48 1 OY04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 _ 1,2,3- EPA 8260E pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 140 Trichlorobenzene Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/06/2017 ND 25 130 l OY04/2017 ND 24 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2400 07/06/2017 ND 24 120 l OY04/2017 ND 23 120 Annual Mean <980 1,2,3- EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 280 Trichloropropane Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 5700 07/O6/2017 ND 25 250 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 240 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 25 250 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 4900 07/O6/2017 ND 24 240 l OY04/2017 ND 23 230 Annual Mean <980 1,2,4- EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 140 Trichlorobenzene Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/O6/2017 ND 25 130 l OY04/2017 ND 24 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/20171ND 25 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2400 07/06/2017 ND 24 _ 120 1 OY04/2017 ND 23 120 Annual Mean <980 1,2,4- EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Trimethylbenzene Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/06/2017 28 DNQ 25 51 10/04/2017INND 24 49 Annual Mean 160 DNQ EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 27 DNQ 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/06/2017 24 DNQ 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean 140 DNQ 1,2-Dibromo-3- EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 57 140 chloropropane Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/06/2017 ND 51 130 l OY04/2017 ND 49 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 49 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2400 07/06/2017 ND 48 120 l OY04/2017 ND 47 120 Annual Mean <980 _ 1,2-Dibromoethane EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/O6/2017 ND 25 51 l OY04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01Y04/2017ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/O6/2017 ND 24 48 l OY04/2017 ND 23 47 Page 21 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date 'Result MDL RL Location Annual Mean <490 1,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01J04/2017 ND 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/06/2017 ND 25 51 10/04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/06/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 1,2-Dichloroethane EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/06/2017 ND 25 51 10/04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/06/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean 1<490 1,2-Dichloropmpane EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/O6/2017 ND 25 51 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01J04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/O6/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 1,3,5- EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plants 01/04/20171ND 28 57 Trichlombenzene Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2300 07/O6/2017 ND 25 51 10/04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <1100 _ EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2000 07/O6/2017 ND 24 _ 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <980 1,3,5- EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57_ Trimethylbenzene Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/06/2017 ND 25 51 10/04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/06/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/06/2017 ND 25 51 10/04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/06/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 1,3-Dichloropmpane EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Page 22 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/06/2017 ND 25 51 10/04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/O6/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/06/2017 ND 25 51 10/04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/06/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 2,2-Dichloropmpane EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2300 07/06/2017 ND 25 51 l OY04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2000 07/06/2017 ND 24 48 l OY04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <980 2-Chlorotoluene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/O6/2017 ND 25 130 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 25 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2400 07/O6/2017 ND 24 120 l OY04/2017 ND 23 120 Annual Mean <980 2-Hexanone EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 140 710 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 15700 14000 1 OY04/20171 ND 1120 610 Annual Mean <5700 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 120 610 ,Cake 04/05/2017 ND 4900 12000 1 OY04/2017 ND 120 580 Annual Mean <4900 4-Chlorotoluene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND _ 570_ 2800 07/O6/2017 ND _ 25 _ 130 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 _ 120 Annual Mean <570 _ EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01Y04/2017 ND 25 _ 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 2400 07/O6/2017 ND 24 120 1 OY04/2017 ND 23 120 Annual Mean <490 Acrolein EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01Y04/2017 ND 280 2800 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 23000 57000 07/O6/2017 ND 250 2500 1 OY04/2017 ND 240 2400 Annual Mean <23000 Page 23 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosclids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample ISample Date (Result MDL RL Location _ EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND _ 250_ 2500 Cake 04/05/2017 ND _ 20000 49000 07/06/2017 ND _ 240 2400 10/04/2017 ND _ 230 2300 Annual Mean 1<20000 Acrylonitrile EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 570 2800 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 11000 57000 07/O6/2017 ND 510 2500 1 OY04/2017 ND 490 2400 Annual Mean <11000 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 490 2500 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 9800 49000 07/O6/2017 ND 480 2400 10/04/2017 ND 470 2300 Annual Mean <9800 Benzene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/20171ND _ 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND _ 570 1100 07/O6/2017 ND _ 25 _ 51 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 _ 49 Annual Mean <570 _ EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01Y04/2017 ND 25 _ 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/O6/2017 ND 24 48 1 OY04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 Bromobenzene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/06/2017 ND 25 130 10/04/2017 ND 24 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2400 07/06/2017 ND 24 120 10/04/2017 ND 23 120 Annual Mean <980 Bromochlommethan EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 140 e Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/06/2017 ND 25 130 10/04/2017 ND 24 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2400 07/06/2017 ND 24 120 10/04/2017 ND 23 120 Annual Mean <980 Bromodichlorometha EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 ne Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1570 1100 07/O6/2017 ND 25 51 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/O6/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 Bromoform EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/20171 ND 57 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/O6/2017 ND 51 130 10/04/2017 ND 49 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/201717 ND 49 120 Cake 04/05/20ND 980 2400 Page 24 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units Sample Sample Date (Result MDL RL Location _ 07/06/2017 ND 48 120 1 OY04/2017 ND 47 120 Annual Mean <980 Bromomethane EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/06/2017 ND 25 130 l OY04/2017 ND 24 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2400 07/06/2017 ND 24 120 l OY04/2017 ND 23 120 Annual Mean <980 Carbon tetrachloride EPA 8260B Mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/O6/2017 ND 25 130 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B Mg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 25 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2400 07/O6/2017 ND 24 120 l OY04/2017 ND 23 120 Annual Mean <980 Chlorobenzene EPA 8260B Mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57_ Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/O6/2017 ND 25 51 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B Mg/kg dry Plant 2 01Y04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/O6/2017 ND 24 48 1 OY04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 Chloroethane EPA 8260B Mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 57 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/06/2017 ND 51 130 10/04/2017 ND 49 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B Mg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 49 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2400 07/06/2017 ND 48 120 10/04/2017 ND 47 120 Annual Mean <980 Chloroform EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1570 1100 07/06/2017 ND �25 51 l OY04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/06/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 Chloromethane EPA 8260B Mg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND _ 28 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/O6/2017 ND 25 130 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B Mg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 25 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2400 07/O6/2017 ND 24 120 l OY04/2017 ND 23 120 Page 25 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location Annual Mean <980 cis-1,2- EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01J04/2017 ND 28 57 Dichloroethene Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/06/2017 ND 25 51 10/04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/06/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 cis-1,3- EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Dichloropropene Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/06/2017 ND 25 51 10/04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/06/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 Dibromochlorometha EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 ne Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/O6/2017 ND 25 51 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01J04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/O6/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 Dibromomethane EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/20171ND 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/O6/2017 ND 25 51 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01Y04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/O6/2017 ND 24 48 1 OY04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 Dichlorodi0uorometh EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 57 140 ane Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/06/2017 ND 51 130 10/04/2017 ND 49 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 49 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2400 07/06/2017 ND 48 120 10/04/2017 ND 47 120 Annual Mean <980 Ethylbenzene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1570 1100 07/06/2017 ND �25 51 10/04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/06/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 Hexachlorobutadien EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 140 Page 26 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample Sample Date IResult MDL RL Location e Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/06/2017 ND 25 130 l OY04/2017 ND 24 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 120 Cake 64/65/2017 ND 980 2400 07/O6/2017 ND 24 120 10/04/2017 ND 23 120 Annual Mean <9M Isobutyl alcohol EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 710 1400 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 28000 57000 07/06/2017 ND 640 1300 10/04/2017 ND 610 1200 Annual Mean <28000 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 610 1200 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 24000 49000 07/06/2017 ND 600 1200 10/04/2017 ND 580 1200 Annual Mean <24000 Isopropylbenzene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/06/2017 ND 25 51 l OY04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/06/, 17 ND 24 48 1W04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 m,p-Xylenes EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND _ 57 110 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2300 07/O6/2017 ND 51 100 1 OY04/2017 ND 49 98 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 49 98 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2000 07/O6/2017 ND 48 96 l OY04/2017 ND 47 93 Annual Mean <980 Methyl ethyl ketone EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 3400 140 280 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 5700 11000 07/O6/2017 2200 130 250 l OY04/2017 ND 120 240 Annual Mean 2900 DNQ EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 230 DNQ 120 250 Cake 64/65/2017 ND 4900 9800 07/O6/2017 3400 120 240 10/04/2017 1600 120 230 Annual Mean 2500 DNQ Methylene Chloride EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 140 570 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 5700 11000 07/06/2017 180 DNQ 130 510 10/04/2017 ND 120 490 Annual Mean 1500 DNQ EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 120 490 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 4900 9800 07/06/2017 310 DNQ 120 480 10/04/2017 ND 120 470 Annual Mean 1400 DNQ MIRK EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 71 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 2300 5700 07/06/2017 ND 64 130 Page 27 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date (Result MDL RL Location 10/04/2017 ND 61 120 Annual Mean <2300 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 61 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 2000 4900 07/O6/2017 ND 60 120 10/04/2017 ND 58 120 Annual Mean <2000 Naphthalene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/20171ND 57 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/O6/2017 ND 51 130 10/04/2017 ND 49 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017�ND 49 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2400 07/O6/2017 ND 48 120 10/04/2017 ND 47 120 Annual Mean <980 n-Butylbenzene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/06/2017 ND 25 130 10/04/2017 ND 24 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2400 07/06/2017 ND 24 _ 120 10/04/2017 31 DNQ 23 120 Annual Mean 260 DNO n-Propylbenzene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/06/2017 ND 25 51 10/04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/06/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 o-Xylene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/O6/2017 ND 25 51 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01Y04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/O6/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 sec-Butylbenzene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/20171ND _ 28 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND _ 570 2800 07/O6/2017 ND _ 25 _ 130 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 _ 120 Annual Mean <570 _ EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01Y04/2017 ND 25 _ 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 2400 07/O6/2017 ND 24 _ 120 1 OY04/2017 ND 23 120 Annual Mean <490 Styrene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01Y04/2017 ND 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/O6/2017 ND 25 51 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 _ Page 28 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample ISample Date (Result MDL RL Location EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND _ 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND _ 490 980 07/06/2017 ND _ 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean 1<490 tert-Butylbenzene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND _ 28 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/O6/2017 ND 25 130 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 25 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2400 07/O6/2017 ND 24 120 10/04/2017 ND 23 120 Annual Mean <980 Tetrachloroethene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57_ Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/06/2017 ND 25 51 10/04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/O6/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 Toluene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 30 DNQ 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/06/2017 88 25 51 10/04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean 180 DNQ EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017IND 490 980 07/06/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 25 DNQ 23 47 Annual Mean 140 DNQ trans-1,2- EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Dichloroethene Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/06/2017 ND 25 51 10/04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/O6/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 trans-1,3- EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 57 Dichloropropene Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/O6/2017 ND 25 51 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01Y04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 07/O6/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 Trichloroethene EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/20171ND 28 57 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 570 1100 07/O6/2017 ND 25 51 1 OY04/2017 ND 24 49 Annual Mean <570 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 01Y04/2017 ND 25 49 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 490 980 Page 29 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location I 1 1 07/06/2017 ND 24 48 10/04/2017 ND 23 47 Annual Mean <490 _ Trlchlomfluorometha EPA 8260E pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 28 140 re Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 2800 07/06/2017 ND 25 130 10/04/2017 NO 24 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 2 0VO4/2017 ND 25 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 980 2400 07/06/2017 ND 24 120 10/04/2017 NO 23 120 Annual Mean <980 Vinyl chloride EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 28 140 Cake 04/05/2017 NO 1100 2800 07/06/2017 ND 25 130 10/04/2017 NO 24 120 Annual Mean <1100 EPA 8260B pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 NO 25 120 Cake 04/05/2017 NO 980 2400 07/06/2017 ND 24 120 10/04/2017 ND 23 120 Annual Mean <980 TCLP-Volatile Organic Compounds 1,1,1,2- EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.0027 0.050 Tetrachloroethane Cake Annual Mean <0.0027 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0027 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0027 1,1,1- EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.0030 0.020 Trichloroethane Cake Annual Mean <0.0030 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0030 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0030 1,1,2,2- EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.0024 0.020 Tetrachloroethane Cake Annual Mean <0.0024 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0024 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0024 1,1,2- EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.0030 0.020 Trichloroethane Cake Annual Mean <0.0030 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0030 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0030 1,1-Dichloroethane EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.0027 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0027 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0027 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0027 1,1-Dichloroethene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.0042 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0042 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0042 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0042 1,1-Dichloropropene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.0028 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0028 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0028 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0028 1,2,3- EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 0.0032 DNQ 0.0030 0.050 Trichlorobenzene Cake Annual Mean 0.0032 DNQ EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0030 0.050 _ Cake Annual Mean <0.0030 _ 1,2,3- EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.0040 0.10 Trichloropropane Cake Annual Mean <0.0040 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0040 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.0040 1,2,4- EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.0048 0.050 Trichlorobenzene Cake Annual Mean <0.0048 Page 30 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample Sample Date (Result MDL RL Location EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0048 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0048 1,2,4- EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0023 0.020 Trimethylbenzene Cake Annual Mean <0.0023 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0023 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0023 1,2-Dibromo-3- EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0097 0.050 chloropropane Cake Annual Mean <0.0097 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0097 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0097 1,2-Dibromoethane EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0040 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0040 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0040 0.020 Cake Annual Mean '0.0040 1,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0032 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0032 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0032 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0032 1,2-Dichloroethane EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0028 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0028 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0028 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0028 1,2-Dichloropropane EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0035 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0035 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0035 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0035 1,3,5- EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0050 0.020 Trichlorobenzene Cake Annual Mean <0.0050 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0050 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0050 1,3,5- EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.026 0.020 Trimethylbenzene Cake Annual Mean <0.026 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.026 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.026 1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0035 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0035 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0035 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0035 1,3-Dichloropropane EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0032 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0032 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0032 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0032 1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0037 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0037 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0037 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0037 2,2-Dichloropropane EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0034 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0034 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0034 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0034 2-Chlorotoluene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0028 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0028 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0028 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0028 4-Chlorotoluene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0029 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0029 _ EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0029 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0029 Acetone EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 0.61 0.045 10.10 Cake Annual Mean 0.61 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/20171.1 0.045 0.10 Cake Annual Mean 1.1 Page 31 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample (Sample Date (Result MDL RL Location Acrolein EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.040 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.040 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.040 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.040 Acrylonitrile EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.012 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.012 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.012 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.012 Benzene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0028 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0028 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0028 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0028 Bromobenzene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0027 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0027 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0027 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0027 Bromochloromethan EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0040 0.050 e Cake Annual Mean <0.0040 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0040 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0040 Bromodichlorometha EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0030 0.020 ne Cake Annual Mean <0.0030 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0030 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0030 Bromoform EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0040 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0040 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0040 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0040 Bromomethane EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/20171 ND 0.0042 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0042 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0042 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0042 Carbon tetrachloride EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0028 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0028 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0028 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0028 Chlombenzene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0036 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0036 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0036 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0036 Chlomethane EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0040 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0040 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0040 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0040 Chloroform EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0033 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0033 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0033 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0033 Chloromelhane EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0D40 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0040 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0040 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0040 cis-1,2- EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0032 0.020 Dichloroethene Cake Annual Mean <0.0032 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0032 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0032 cis-1,3- EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0022 0.020 Dichlompropene Cake Annual Mean <0.0022 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0022 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0022 Dibromochlorometha EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0040 0.020 ne Cake Annual Mean <0.0040 Page 32 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample Sample Date (Result MDL RL Location EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0040 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0040 Dibromomethane EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0036 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0036 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0036 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0036 Dichlorodifluorometh EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0026 0.050 ane Cake Annual Mean <0.0026 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0026 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0026 Ethylbenzene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0025 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0025 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0025 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0025 Hex chlorobutsdien EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0038 0.050 e Cake Annual Mean <0.0038 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0038 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0038 Isobutyl alcohol EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.070 0.20 Cake Annual Mean <0.070 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.070 0.20 Cake Annual Mean <0.070 Isopropylbenzene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0025 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0025 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0025 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0025 m,p-Xylenes EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0060 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0060 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0060 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0060 Methyl ethyl ketone EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 0.054 DNO 0.047 0.10 Cake Annual Mean 0.054 DNO EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.047 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.047 Methylene Chloride EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 0.012 DNC1 0.0095 0.050 Cake Annual Mean 0.012 DNC1 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 2 01/04/2017 0.0095 DNQ 0.0095 0.050 Cake Annual Mean 0.0095 DNQ MIRK EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.035 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.035 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.035 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.035 Naphthalene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 0.0058 DNQ 0.0041 0.050 Cake Annual Mean 0.0058 DNQ EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0041 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0041 n-Butylbenzene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0037 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0037 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0037 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0037 n-Propylbenzene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0027 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0027 _ EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0027 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0027 _ o-Xylene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0030 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0030 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017ND 0.0030 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0030 _ sec-Butylbenzene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0025 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0025 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017ND 0.0025 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0025 Page 33 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample (Sample Date (Result MOILRL Location Styrene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.0020 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0020 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0020 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0020 tert-Butylbenzene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.0022 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0022 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0022 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0022 Tetrachloroethene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.0032 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0032 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0032 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0032 Toluene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.0036 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0036 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0036 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0036 trans-1,2- EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.0030 0.020 Dichloroethene Cake Annual Mean <0.0030 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0030 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0030 trans-1,3- EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0032 0.020 Dichloropropene Cake Annual Mean <0.0032 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0032 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0032 Trichloroethene EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0026 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0026 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0026 0.020 Cake Annual Mean <0.0026 Trichlorofluorometha EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.0034 0.050 ne Cake Annual Mean <0.0034 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0034 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0034 Vinyl chloride EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.0040 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0040 EPA 8260B mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.0040 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.0040 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds 1,2,4- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 6800 17000 Trichlorobenzene Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7000 17000 07/06/2017 ND 14000 35000 10/04/2017 NO 1000 2500 Annual Mean <14000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 NO 6600 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 12000 30000 07/06/2017 ND 13000 32000 10/04/2017 ND 970 2400 Annual Mean <13000 1,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plants 01/04/20171ND 3600 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 NO 3700 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7500 35000 10/04/2017 ND 530 2500 Annual Mean <7500 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 NO 3500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6400 30000 07/06/2017 NO 6700 32000 10/04/2017 NO 510 2400 Annual Mean <6700 1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 6800 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 NO 7000 17000 07/06/2017 NO 14000 35000 10/04/2017 NO 1000 2500 Annual Mean <14000 Page 34 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample ISample Date (Result MDL RL Location EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 6600 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND _ 12000 30000 07/06/2017 ND _ 13000 32000 10/04/2017 ND _ 970 2400 Annual Mean 1<13000 1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND _ 6800 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7000 17000 07/O6/2017 ND 14000 35000 1 OY04/2017 ND _ 1000 2500 Annual Mean <14000 _ EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 6600 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 12000 30000 07/O6/2017 ND 13000 32000 10/04/2017 ND 970 2400 Annual Mean <13000 2,4,5- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/20171ND 6600 17000 Tdchlorophenol Cake 04/05/2017 ND 16900 17000 07/O6/2017 ND 14000 35000 10/04/2017 ND 990 2500 Annual Mean <14000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017IND 6400 16000 Cake 04/05/201 N7 D 12000 30000 07/O6/2017 ND 12000 32000 10/04/2017 ND 940 2400 Annual Mean <12000 2,4,6- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3800 17000 Tdchlorophenol Cake 04/05/2017 ND 4000 17000 07/06/2017 ND 8100 35000 10/04/2017 ND 570 2500 Annual Mean <8100 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3700 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6900 30000 07/06/2017 ND 7200 32000 10/04/2017 ND 540 2400 Annual Mean <7200 2,4-Dichlorophenol EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3400 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3500 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7200 35000 10/04/2017 ND 510 2500 Annual Mean <7200 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3300 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6100 30000 07/06/2017 ND 6400 32000 10/04/2017 ND 490 2400 Annual Mean <6400 2,4-Dimethylphenol EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 6600 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 16900 17000 07/06/2017 ND 114000 35000 10/04/2017 ND 990 2500 Annual Mean <14000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 6400 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 12000 30000 07/06/2017 ND 12000 32000 10/04/2017 ND 940 2400 Annual Mean <12000 2,4-Dinitmphenol EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 17000 34000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 17000 35000 07/06/2017 ND 35000 71000 10/04/2017 ND 2500 5000 Annual Mean <35000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 16000 33000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 30000 60000 Page 35 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location 07/06/2017 ND 32000 63000 1 OY04/2017 ND 2400 4800 Annual Mean <32000 2,4-Dinitrotoluene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 4100 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 4200 17000 07/06/2017 ND 8600 35000 l OY04/2017 ND 610 2500 Annual Mean <8600 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 4000 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7300 30000 07/06/2017 ND 7600 32000 10/04/2017 ND 580 2400 Annual Mean <7600 2,6-Dinitrotoluene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 4900 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 5000 17000 07/O6/2017 ND 10000 35000 1 OY04/2017 ND 720 2500 Annual Mean <10000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 4700 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 8700 30000 07/O6/2017 ND 9100 32000 l OY04/2017 ND 690 2400 Annual Mean <9100 2- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3400 17000 Chloronaphthalene Cake 04/O5/2017 ND 3500 17000 07/O6/2017 ND 7200 35000 10/04/2017 ND 510 2500 Annual Mean 1<7200 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3300 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6100 30000 07/O6/2017 ND 6400 32000 10/04/2017 ND 490 2400 Annual Mean <6400 2-Chlorophenol EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3600 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3700 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7500 35000 10/04/2017 ND 530 2500 Annual Mean <7500 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6400 30000 07/06/2017 ND 6700 32000 10/04/2017 ND 510 2400 Annual Mean <6700 2-Methylnaphthalene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3600 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3700 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7500 35000 l OY04/2017 ND 530 2500 Annual Mean <7500 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6400 30000 07/06/2017 ND 6700 32000 10/04/2017 ND 510 2400 Annual Mean <6700 2-Methylphenol EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 4100 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 4200 17000 07/06/2017 ND 8600 35000 10/04/2017 ND 610 2500 Annual Mean <8600 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 4000 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7300 30000 07/06/2017 ND 7600 32000 10/04/2017 ND 580 2400 Page 36 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location Annual Mean <7600 2-Nitroaniline EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01J04/2017 ND 3400 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3500 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7200 35000 10/04/2017 ND 510 2500 Annual Mean <7200 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3300 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6100 30000 07/06/2017 ND 6400 32000 10/04/2017 ND 490 2400 Annual Mean <6400 2-Nitrophenol EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 6800 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7000 17000 07/06/2017 ND 14000 35000 10J04/2017 ND 1000 2500 Annual Mean <14000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 6600 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 12000 30000 07/06/2017 ND 13000 32000 l OY04/2017 ND 970 2400 Annual Mean 1<13000 3,3- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 7700 42000 Dichlorobenzidine Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7900 44000 07/O6/2017 ND 16000 89000 1 OY04/2017 ND 1100 6300 Annual Mean <16000 _ EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01J04/2017 ND 7400 41000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 14000 76000 07/O6/2017 ND 14000 79000 l OY04/2017 ND 1100 6000 Annual Mean <14000 3-Nitroaniline EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017IND 6800 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7000 17000 07/O6/2017 ND 14000 35000 l OY04/2017 ND 1000 2500 Annual Mean <14000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017IND 6600 16000 Cake 04/05/201 N7 12000 30000 07/06/2017 ND _ 13000 32000 10/04/2017 ND 970 2400 Annual Mean <13000 _ 4,6-Dinitro-2- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 6800 21000 methylphenol Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7000 22000 07/06/2017 ND 14000 45000 10/04/2017 ND 1000 3200 Annual Mean <14000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 6600 21000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 12000 38000 07/06/2017 ND 13000 40000 10/04/2017 ND 970 3000 Annual Mean <13000 4-Bromcphenyl EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 3800 17000 phenyl ether Cake 04/05/2017 ND 4000 17000 07/06/2017 ND 8100 35000 l OY04/2017 ND 570 2500 Annual Mean <8100 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3700 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6900 30000 07/06/2017 ND 7200 32000 10/04/2017 ND 540 2400 Annual Mean <7200 4-Chlorc-3- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3600 17000 Page 37 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location methylphenol Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3700 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7500 35000 10/04/2017 ND 530 2500 Annual Mean <7500 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6400 30000 07/O6/2017 ND 6700 32000 10/04/2017 ND 510 2400 Annual Mean <6700 4-Chloroaniline EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 6800 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7000 17000 07/06/2017 ND 14000 35000 10/04/2017 ND 1000 2500 Annual Mean <14000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 6600 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 12000 30000 07/06/2017 ND 13000 32000 10/04/2017 ND 970 2400 Annual Mean <13000 4-Chlorophenyl EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 4300 17000 phenyl ether Cake 04/05/2017 ND 4500 17000 07/06/2017 ND 9100 35000 10/04/2017 ND 650 2500 Annual Mean <9100 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND _ 4200 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7800 30000 07/06/2017 ND 8100 32000 10/04/2017 ND 620 2400 Annual Mean I<8100 4-Methylphenol EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 6800 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 8700 DNQ 7000 17000 07/O6/2017 ND 14000 35000 1 OY04/2017 ND 1000 2500 Annual Mean 7600 DNQ EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 6600 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 12000 30000 07/O6/2017 ND 13000 32000 10/04/2017 ND 970 2400 Annual Mean <13000 4-Nitroaniline EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/20171ND 6800 42000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7000 44000 07/O6/2017 ND 14000 89000 10/04/2017 ND 1000 6300 Annual Mean <14000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017IND 6600 41000 Cake 04/05/201 N7 12000 76000 07/O6/2017 ND 13000 79000 10/04/2017 ND 970 6000 Annual Mean <13000 4-Nitrophenol EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 7200 42000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7400 44000 07/06/2017 ND 15000 89000 10/04/2017 ND 1100 6300 Annual Mean <15000 ,EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 6900 41000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 13000 76000 07/06/2017 ND 13000 79000 10/04/2017 ND 1000 6000 Annual Mean <13000 Acenaphthene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3400 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3500 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7200 35000 Page 38 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location _ 10/04/2017 ND 510 2500 Annual Mean <7200 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 3300 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6100 30000 07/O6/2017 ND 6400 32000 10/04/2017 ND 490 2400 Annual Mean <6400 Acenaphthylene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3600 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3700 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7500 35000 10/04/2017 ND 530 2500 Annual Mean <7500 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6400 30000 07/O6/2017 ND 6700 32000 10/04/2017 ND 510 2400 Annual Mean <6700 _ Aniline EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 4300 21000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 4500 22000 07/06/2017 ND 9100 45000 10/04/2017 ND 650 3200 Annual Mean <9100 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 4200 21000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7800 38000 07/06/2017 ND 8100 40000 10/04/2017 ND 620 3000 Annual Mean <8100 Anthracene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 4100 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 4200 17000 07/06/2017 ND 8600 35000 10/04/2017 ND 610 2500 Annual Mean <8600 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 4000 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7300 30000 07/06/2017 ND 7600 32000 10/04/2017 ND 580 2400 Annual Mean <7600 Azobenzene/1,2- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3600 17000 Diphenylhydrazine Cake 04/OS/2017 ND 3700 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7500 35000 10/04/2017 ND 530 2500 Annual Mean <7500 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 3500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6400 30000 07/06/2017 ND 6700 32000 10/04/2017 ND 510 2400 Annual Mean <6700 Benz(a)anthracene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3600 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3700 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7500 35000 10/04/2017 ND 530 2500 Annual Mean 1<7500 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6400 30000 07/06/2017 ND 6700 32000 1 OY04/2017 ND 510 2400 Annual Mean <6700 Benzidine EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 34000 69000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 35000 71000 07/O6/2017 ND 71000 140000 1 OY04/2017 ND 5000 10000 Annual Mean <71000 Page 39 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample ISample Date Result MDL RL Location EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 33000 66000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND _ 60000 120000 07/06/2017 ND _ 63000 130000 10/04/2017 ND _ 4800 9700 Annual Mean I<63000 Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND _ 3400 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND _ 3500 17000 07/O6/2017 ND 7200 35000 1 OY04/2017 ND 510 2500 Annual Mean <7200 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01J04/2017 ND 3300 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6100 30000 07/06/2017 ND 6400 32000 10/04/2017 ND 490 2400 Annual Mean <6400 Benzo(b)8uoranthen EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3600 17000 e Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3700 17000 07/06/2017 ND 17500 35000 10/04/2017 ND 1530 2500 Annual Mean <7500 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6400 30000 07/O6/2017 ND 6700 32000 10/04/2017 ND 510 2400 Annual Mean <6700 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 5600 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 5800 17000 07/06/2017 ND 12000 35000 10/04/2017 ND 840 2500 Annual Mean <12000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 5500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 10000 30000 07/06/2017 ND 11000 32000 10/04/2017 ND 800 2400 Annual Mean <11000 Benzo(k)8uoranthen EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3600 17000 e Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3700 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7500 35000 10/04/2017 ND 530 2500 Annual Mean <7500 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6400 30000 07/06/2017 ND 6700 32000 10/04/2017 ND 510 2400 Annual Mean <6700 Benzoic acid EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 17000 42000 Cake 04/OS/2017 ND 18000 44000 07/O6/2017 ND 36000 89000 10/04/2017 ND 2600 6300 Annual Mean <36000 _ EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 17000 41000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 31000 76000 07/06/2017 ND 32000 79000 10/04/2017 ND 2500 6000 Annual Mean <32000 Benzyl alcohol EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 7700 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7900 17000 07/06/2017 ND 16000 35000 10/04/2017 ND 1100 2500 Annual Mean <16000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 7400 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 14000 30000 Page 40 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units Sample Sample Date (Result MDL RL Location 07/06/2017 ND 14000 32000 1 OY04/2017 ND 1100 2400 Annual Mean <14000 Bis(2- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 6800 17000 chloroethoxy)methan Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7000 17000 e 07/06/2017 ND _ 14000 35000 l OY04/2017 ND 1000 2500 Annual Mean <14000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 6600 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 12000 30000 07/06/2017 ND 13000 32000 l OY04/2017 ND 970 2400 Annual Mean 1<13000 Bis(2- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3600 17000 chloroethyl)ether Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3700 17000 07/O6/2017 ND 7500 35000 1 OY04/2017 ND 530 2500 Annual Mean <7500 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 3500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6400 30000 07/O6/2017 ND 6700 32000 l OY04/2017 ND 510 2400 Annual Mean <6700 Bis(2- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 6800 17000 chloroisopropyl)ethe Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7000 17000 r 07/06/2017 ND 14000 35000 10/04/2017 ND 1000 2500 Annual Mean <14000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 6600 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 12000 30000 07Y06/2017 ND _ 13000 32000 10/04/2017 ND 1970 2400 Annual Mean <13000 Bis(2- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 45000 4600 17000 ethylhexypphthalate Cake 04/05/2017 37000 4700 17000 07/06/2017 45000 9700 35000 10/04/2017 8900 680 2500 Annual Mean 34000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 49000 4500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 47000 8200 30000 07/06/2017 40000 8600 32000 10/04/2017 14000 650 2400 Annual Mean 38000 Butyl benzyl EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 4100 17000 phthalate Cake 04/05/2017 ND 4200 17000 07/06/2017 ND 8600 35000 l OY04/2017 ND 610 2500 Annual Mean <8600 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 4000 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7300 30000 07/06/2017 ND 7600 32000 10/04/2017 ND 580 2400 Annual Mean <7600 Chrysene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3800 17000 Cake 04/OS/2017 ND 4000 17000 07/06/2017 ND 8100 35000 10/04/2017 ND 570 2500 Annual Mean <8100 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 3700 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6900 30000 07/06/2017 ND 7200 32000 10/04/2017 ND 540 2400 Page 41 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location Annual Mean <7200 Cresol EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 14000 35000 Cake Annual Mean <14000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 07/06/2017 ND 13000 32000 Cake Annual Mean <13000 Dibenz(a,h)anthrace EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 5100 21000 ne Cake 04/05/2017 ND 5300 22000 07/O6/2017 ND 11000 45000 1 OY04/2017 ND 760 3200 Annual Mean <11000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01J04/2017 ND 5000 21000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 9200 38000 07/O6/2017 ND 19600 40000 10/04/2017 ND 730 3000 Annual Mean <9600 Dibenzofuran EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3400 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3500 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7200 35000 10/04/2017 ND 510 2500 Annual Mean <7200 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3300 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6100 30000 07/O6/2017 ND 6400 32000 10/04/2017 ND 490 2400 Annual Mean <6400 Diethyl phthalate EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND _ 4900 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 5000 17000 07/06/2017 ND 10000 35000 10/04/2017 ND 720 2500 Annual Mean <10000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 4700 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 8700 30000 07/06/2017 ND 9100 32000 10/04/2017 ND 690 2400 Annual Mean <9100 Dimethyl phthalate EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3400 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3500 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7200 35000 10/04/2017 ND _ 510 2500 Annual Mean <7200 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3300 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6100 30000 07/06/2017 ND 6400 32000 10/04/2017 ND 490 2400 Annual Mean <6400 Di-n-butyl phthalate EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 4600 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 4700 17000 07/06/2017 ND 9700 35000 10/04/2017 ND 680 2500 Annual Mean <9700 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 4500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 8200 30000 07/06/2017 ND 8600 32000 10/04/2017 ND 650 2400 Annual Mean <8600 Di-n-octyl phthalate EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 4600 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 4700 17000 07/06/2017 ND 9700 35000 10/04/2017 ND 680 2500 Annual Mean 1<9700 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 14500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 18200 30000 Page 42 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location 07/06/2017 ND 8600 32000 1 OY04/2017 ND 650 2400 Annual Mean <8600 Fluoranthene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3600 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3700 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7500 35000 l OY04/2017 ND 530 2500 Annual Mean <7500 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6400 30000 07/06/2017 ND 6700 32000 10/04/2017 ND 1510 2400 Annual Mean <6700 Fluorene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3600 17000 Cake 04/55/2017 ND 3700 17000 07/O6/2017 ND 7500 35000 10/04/2017 ND 530 2500 Annual Mean <7500 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 3500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6400 30000 07/06/2017 ND 6700 32000 10/04/2017 ND 510 2400 Annual Mean <6700 Henchlombenzene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3600 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3700 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7500 35000 10/04/2017 ND 530 2500 Annual Mean <7500 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6400 30000 07/O6/2017 ND 6700 32000 10/04/2017 ND 510 2400 Annual Mean <6700 Henchlombutadien EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 6800 17000 e Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7000 17000 07/06/2017 ND 14000 35000 10/04/2017 ND 1000 2500 Annual Mean <14000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 6600 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 12000 30000 07/06/2017 ND 13000 32000 10/04/2017 ND 970 2400 Annual Mean <13000 Henchlomcyclopent EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 6800 42000 adiene Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7000 44000 07/06/2017 ND 14000 89000 l OY04/2017 ND 1000 6300 Annual Mean <14000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 6600 41000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 12000 76000 07/06/2017 ND 13000 79000 l OY04/2017 ND 970 6000 Annual Mean 1<13000 Henchlomethane EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 6800 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7000 17000 07/O6/2017 ND 14000 35000 1 OY04/2017 ND _ 1000 2500 Annual Mean <14000 _ EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 6600 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 12000 30000 07/O6/2017 ND 13000 32000 l OY04/2017 ND 970 2400 Page 43 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location Annual Mean <13000 Indeno(1,2,3- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plants 01J04/2017 ND 6600 17000 cd)pyrene Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6900 17000 07/06/2017 ND 14000 35000 10/04/2017 ND 990 2500 Annual Mean <14000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 6400 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 12000 30000 07/06/2017 ND 12000 32000 10/04/2017 ND 940 2400 Annual Mean <12000 _ Isophorone EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3400 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3500 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7200 35000 10/04/, ND 510 2500 Annual Mean <7200 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3300 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6100 30000 07/06/2017 ND 6400 32000 10/04/2017 ND 490 2400 Annual Mean <6400 Kepone EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 151000 200000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 53000 210000 07/O6/2017 ND 110000 430000 1 OY04/2017 ND 15000 61000 Annual Mean <110000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01J04/2017 ND 50000 200000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 92000 370000 07/O6/2017 ND 96000 380000 l OY04/2017 ND 18000 73000 Annual Mean <96000 Naphthalene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3400 17000 Cake 04/05/201; ND 3500 17000 07/0 /2017 ND 7200 35000 10/04/2017 ND 510 2500 Annual Mean 1<7200 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3300 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6100 30000 07/O6/2017 ND 6400 32000 10/04/2017 ND 490 2400 Annual Mean <6400 Nitrobenzene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3600 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3700 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7500 35000 10/04/2017 ND 530 2500 Annual Mean <7500 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6400 30000 07/06/2017 ND 6700 32000 10/04/2017 ND 510 2400 Annual Mean <6700 N- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3600 17000 Nitrosodimethylamin Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3700 17000 e 07/06/2017 ND 7500 35000 l OY04/2017 ND 530 2500 Annual Mean <7500 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6400 30000 07/06/2017 ND 6700 32000 10/04/2017 ND 510 2400 Annual Mean 1<6700 N-Nitroso-di-n- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3600 13000 Page 44 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosclids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location propylamine Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3700 13000 07/06/2017 ND 7500 27000 10/04/2017 ND 530 1900 Annual Mean <7500 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 3500 12000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6400 23000 07/O6/2017 ND 6700 24000 10/04/2017 ND 510 1800 Annual Mean <6700 N- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 4100 17000 Nitrosodiphenylamin Cake 04/05/2017 ND 4200 17000 e 07/06/2017 ND 8600 35000 10/04/2017 ND 610 2500 Annual Mean <8600 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 4000 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7300 30000 07/06/2017 ND 7600 32000 10/04/2017 ND 580 2400 Annual Mean <7600 Pentachlorophenol EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 17000 42000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 18000 44000 07/06/2017 ND 36000 89000 10/04/2017 ND 2600 6300 Annual Mean <36000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 17000 41000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 31000 76000 07/06/P017 ND 32000 79000 10/04/2017 ND 2500 6000 Annual Mean <32000 Phenanthrene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3400 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 3500 17000 07/06/2017 ND 7200 35000 10/04/2017 ND 510 2500 Annual Mean <7200 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 3300 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 6100 30000 07/06/2017 ND 6400 32000 10/04/2017 ND 490 2400 Annual Mean 8400 Phenol EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 4600 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 4700 17000 07/06/2017 ND 9700 35000 10/04/2017 ND 680 2500 Annual Mean <9700 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 4500 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 8200 30000 07Y06/2017 ND 8600 32000 10/04/2017 ND 650 2400 Annual Mean <8600 Pyrene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 4100 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 7100 17000 07/06/2017 ND 14000 35000 10/04/2017 ND 1000 2500 Annual Mean <14000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 4000 16000 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 12000 30000 07/06/2017 ND 13000 32000 10/04/2017 ND 1980 2400 Annual Mean <13000 Pyridine EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 7700 17000 Cake 04/05/4017 ND 7900 18000 07/06/4017 ND 16000 36000 Page 45 of 65 2017 OCSD eiosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date (Result MDL RL Location 10/04/2017 NO 1100 2600 Annual Mean <16000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 NO 7400 17000 Cake 04/05/2017 NO 14000 31000 07/06/2017 ND 14000 32000 10/04/2017 ND 1100 2500 Annual Mean <14000 TCLP-Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds 1,2,4- EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.013 0.050 Trichlombenzene Cake Annual Mean <0.013 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.013 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 1,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.013 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 NO 0.013 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.013 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.013 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 07/06/2017 NO 0.013 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.013 2,4,5- EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 10.015 0.10 Trichlorophenol Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 NO 0.015 0.10 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.015 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 07/06/2017 NO 0.015 0.10 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.015 2,4,6- EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.023 0.10 Trichlorophenol Cake Annual Mean <0.023 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 NO 0.023 0.10 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.023 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.023 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.023 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 07/06/2017 NO 0.023 0.10 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.023 2,4-Dichlorophenol EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.010 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.010 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.010 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.010 2,4-Dimethylphenol EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2617 NO 0.018 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.018 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 2,4-Dinitmphenol EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.&0 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.040 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.040 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.040 2,4-Dinitmtoluene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO 0.018 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 NO 0.018 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.018 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 NO 0.018 0.050 _ Cake Annual Mean <0.018 Page 46 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample Sample Date (Result MDL RL Location EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.018 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.018 2,6-Dinitrotoluene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.010 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.010 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.010 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.010 2- EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Chloronaphthalene Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 2-Chlorophenol EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 2-Methylnaphthalene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.010 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.010 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.010 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.010 2-Methylphenol EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01Y04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean 1<0.015 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 1 07/O6/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 07/O6/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.015 2-Nitroaniline EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.010 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.010 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01104/2017ND 0.010 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.010 2-Nitrophenol EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 3,3- EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.038 0.20 Dichlorobenzidine Cake Annual Mean <0.038 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.038 0.20 Cake Annual Mean <0.038 3-Nitroaniline EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 4,6-Dinitro-2- EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.020 0.20 methylphenol Cake Annual Mean <0.020 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.020 0.20 Cake Annual Mean <0.020 4-Bromophenyl EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 phenyl ether Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 4-Chlorc-3- EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 10.013 0.10 methylphenol Cake Annual Mean <0.013 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 10.013 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 4-Chloroaniline EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.010 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.010 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.010 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.010 4-Chlorophenyl EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.013 0.050 phenyl ether Cake Annual Mean <0.013 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.013 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 Page 47 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location 4-Methylphenol EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 0.034 DNO 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean 0.034 DNO EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 0.043 DND 0.015 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual Mew 0.043 DND EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND _ 0.015 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.015 4-Nitroaniline EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.020 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.020 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.020 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.020 4-Nitrophenol EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.028 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.028 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.028 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.028 Acenaphthene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 Acenaphthylene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 Aniline EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 Anthracene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.013 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.013 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 Azobenzene/1,2- EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.013 0.10 Diphenylhydrazine Cake Annual Mean <0.013 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.013 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 Benz(a)anthracene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 10.013 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.013 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 Benzidine EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.050 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.050 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.050 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.050 Benzo(a)pyrene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 Benzo(b)8uoranthen EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.010 0.050 e Cake Annual Mean <0.010 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.010 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.010 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.020 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.020 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.020 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.020 Benzo(k)8uoranthen EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.013 0.050 e Cake Annual Mean <0.013 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.013 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 Benzoic acid EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 0.054 DND 0.050 0.50 Cake Annual Mean 0.054 DND Page 48 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample Sample Date (Result MDL RL Location EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.050 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.050 Benzyl alcohol EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017ND 0.018 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 Bis(2- EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 chlomethoxy)methan Cake Annual Mean <0.015 e EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 Bis(2- EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 chlomethyl)ether Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 Bis(2- EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.013 0.050 chlomisopmpyl)ethe Cake Annual Mean <0.013 r EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.013 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 Bis(2- EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.020 0.25 ethylhexypphthalate Cake Annual Mean <0.020 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.020 0.25 Cake Annual Mean <0.020 Butyl benzyl EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.020 0.10 phthalate Cake Annual Mean <0.020 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.020 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.020 Chrysene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01J04/2017 ND 10.013 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01104/2017ND 10.013 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 Cresol EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 0.043 DND 0.015 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean 0.043 DND EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.015 Dibenz(a,h)anthrace EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.10 ne Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 Dibenzofuran EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.020 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.020 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.020 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.020 Diethyl phthalate EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 Dimethyl phthalate EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.013 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.013 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 Di-n-butyl phthalate EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 Di-n-octyl phthalate EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.20 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.20 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 Fluoranthene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 Page 49 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample (Sample Date Result MDL RL Location Fluorene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 Henchlombenzene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 0WND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual 15 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 00.015 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual 15Henchlombutadien EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 00.020 0.050 e Cake Annual 020 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.020 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.020 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01Y04/2017 ND 0.020 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.020 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.020 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.020 Henchlomcyclopent EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.025 0.20 adiene Cake Annual Mean <0.025 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.025 0.20 Cake Annual Mean <0.025 Henchlomethane EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.018 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean r 18 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 0.018 0.050 Cake Annual Mean 18 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 07/06/2017 0.018 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.018 Indeno(1,2,3- EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.10 cd)pyrene Cake Annual Mean <0.018 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 Isophorone EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 Kepone EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.035 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.035 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.035 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.035 Naphthalene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 Nitrobenzene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.20 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 10.015 0.20 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.015 0.20 Cake Annual Mean <0.015 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.015 0.20 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.015 N- EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01Y0412117 ND 0.012 0.10 Nitrosodimethylamin Cake Annual Mean <0.012 e EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.012 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <0.012 N-Nitroso-di-n- EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.10 propylamine Cake Annual Mean <0.018 Page 50 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL _ Location EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.10 _ Cake Annual Mean <0.018 N- EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.010 0.050 Nitrosodiphenylamin Cake Annual Mean <0.010 e EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.010 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.010 Pentachlorophenol EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.20 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 1 07/O6/2017 ND 0.018 0.20 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.018 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.20 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.018 0.20 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.018 Phenanthrene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.018 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.018 Phenol EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.010 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.010 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.010 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.010 Pyrene EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.020 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.020 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.020 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.020 Pyridine EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.013 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.013 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.013 EPA 8270C mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.013 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <0.013 EPA 8270C- mg/L Plant 2 07/O6/2017 ND 0.013 0.050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.013 Organochlorine Pesticides Alddn EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 42 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 140 07/O6/2017 ND 13 85 Annual Mean <43 mg/kg dry Plant 1 10/24/2017 ND 0.034 0.11 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.034 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 35 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 110 07/06/2017 ND 11 76 Annual Mean <35 mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.035 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.035 alpha-BHC EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 42 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 140 07/O6/2017 ND 11 _ 85 Annual Mean <43 _ mg/kg dry Plant 1 10/24/2017 ND 0.034 0.11 weight Cake Annual Mean I<0.034 _ EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 35 _ 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 _ 110 07/06/2017 ND 9.5_ 76 Annual Mean <35 mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.035 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.035 beta-BHC EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 42 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 140 07/06/2017 ND 33 85 Page 51 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location _ Annual Mean <43 _ mg/kg dry Plant 1 10/24/2017 ND 0.034 0.11 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.034 _ EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01Y04/2017 ND 35 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 110 07/06/2017 ND 29 76_ Annual Mean <35 _ mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.035 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.035 Chlordane EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01J04/2017 ND 280 1400 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 280 1400 07/O6/2017 ND 390 1200 Annual Mean <390 mg/kg dry Plant 1 lOY24/2017 ND 0.23 1.1 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.23 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 240 1200 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 220 1100 07/O6/2017 ND 350 1100 Annual Mean <350 mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.23 1.2 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.23 delta-BHC EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 42 280 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 280 07/06/2017 ND 20 85 Annual Mean <43 mg/kg dry Plant 1 10/24/2017 ND 0.034 0.23 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.034 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 35 240 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 220 07/06/2017 ND 18 76 Annual Mean <35 mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.035 0.23 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.035 Dieldrin EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01J04/2017 ND 42 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 140 07/O6/2017 ND 10 85 Annual Mean <43 mg/kg dry Plant 1 lOY24/2017 ND 0.034 0.11 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.034 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 35 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 110 07/O6/2017 ND 9.3 76 Annual Mean <35 mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.035 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.035 Endosulfan 1 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 42 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 140 07/06/2017 ND 8.8 85 Annual Mean <43 mg/kg dry Plant 1 10/24/2017 ND 0.034 0.11 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.034 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 35 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 110 07/06/2017 ND 7.8 76 Annual Mean <35 mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.035 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.035 Endosulfan 2 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01J04/2017 ND 42 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 140 07/O6/2017 ND 14 85 Annual Mean <43 mg/kg dry Plant 1 1 OY24/2017 ND 0.034 0.11 Page 52 of 65 2017 005D Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location weight Cake Annual Mean <0.034 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01J04/2017 ND 35 1120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 110 07/O6/2017 ND 13 76 Annual Mean <35 mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.035 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.035 Endosulfan Sulfate EPA8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/20171 ND 56 280 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 57 280 07/O6/2017 ND 14 85 Annual Mean <57 mg/kg dry Plant 1 10/24/2017 ND 0.046 0.23 weight Cake Annual Mean 1<0.046 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 47 240 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 44 220 07/06/2017 ND 12 76 Annual Mean <47 mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.047 0.23 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.047 Endrin EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01Y04/2017 ND 42 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 140 07/06/2017 ND 15 85 Annual Mean <43 mg/kg dry Plant 1 10/24/2017 ND 0.034 0.11 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.034 _ EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 35 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 110 07/06/2017 ND 14 76 Annual Mean <35 mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.035 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.035 Endrin Aldehyde EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 42 _ 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 _ 140 07/O6/2017 ND 8.5 85 Annual Mean <43 _ mg/kg dry Plant 1 10/24/2017 ND 0.034 0.11 weight Cake Annual Mean 1<0.034 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 35 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 110 07/06/2017 ND 7.6 76 Annual Mean <35 mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.035 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.035 Endrin Ketone EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01J04/2017 ND 56 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 57 140 07/06/2017 ND 24 85 Annual Mean <57 mg/kg dry Plant 1 10/24/2017 ND 0.046 0.11 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.046 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01J04/2017 ND 47 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 44 110 07/O6/2017 ND 22 76 Annual Mean <47 mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.047 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.047 gamma-BHC EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/20171ND 42 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 140 07/O6/2017 ND 23 85 Annual Mean <43 mg/kg dry Plant 1 10/24/2017 ND 0.034 0.11 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.034 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017ND 35 120 Page 53 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample Sample Date (Result MDL RL Location _ Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 110 07/06/2017 ND 21 76 Annual Mean <35 mg/kg dry Plant 10/24/2017 ND 0.035 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean 1<0.035 Heptachlor EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plants 01/04/2017 ND 56 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 57 140 07/06/2017 ND 11 85 Annual Mean <57 mg/kg dry Plant 1 10/24/2017 ND 0.046 0.11 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.046 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 47 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 44 110 07/06/2017 ND 9.5 76 Annual Mean <47 _ mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.047 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.047 _ Heptachlor Epoxide EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 56 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 57 140 07/O6/2017 ND 21 85 Annual Mean <57 _ mg/kg dry Plant 1 lOY24/2017 ND 0.046 0.11 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.046 _ EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/20171ND 47 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 44 110 07/06/2017 ND 19 76 Annual Mean <47 _ mg/kg dry Plant 2 l OY24/2017 ND 0.047 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.047 Kepone EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 1200 3700 Cake 10/24/2017 ND 12000 36000 Annual Mean <12000 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 2 07/06/2017 ND 1100 3300 Cake 10/24/2017 ND 12000 36000 Annual Mean <12000 Methoxychlor EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01J04/2017 ND 42 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 140 07/06/2017 ND 22 _ 160 Annual Mean <43 mg/kg dry Plant 1 10/24/2017 ND 0.034 0.11 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.034 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 35 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 110 07/06/2017 ND 20 150 Annual Mean <35 mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.035 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.035 Mirex EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 42 280 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 280 07/O6/2017 ND 13 85 Annual Mean <43 mg/kg dry Plant 1 10/24/2017 ND 0.034 0.23 weight Cake Annual Mean 1<0.034 _ EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 35 _ 240 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 _ 220_ 07/06/2017 ND 12 _ 76_ Annual Mean <35 _ mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.035 0.23 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.035 _ o,p'-DDD EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01J04/2017 ND 42 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 140 07/06/2017 ND 9.0 85 Page 54 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location _ Annual Mean <43 _ mg/kg dry Plant 1 10/24/2017 ND 0.034 0.11 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.034 _ EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01Y04/2017 ND 35 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 110 07/06/2017 ND 8.0 76_ Annual Mean <35 mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.035 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.035 _ o,p'-DDE EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01J04/2017 ND 42 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 140 07/O6/2017 ND 16 85 Annual Mean <43 _ mg/kg dry Plant 1 lOY24/2017 ND 0.034 0.11 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.034 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 35 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 110 07/O6/2017 ND 14 76 Annual Mean <35 mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.035 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.035 o,p'-DDT EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 42 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 140 07/06/2017 ND 13 85 Annual Mean <43 mg/kg dry Plant 1 10/24/2017 ND 0.034 0.11 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.034 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 35 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 110 07/06/2017 ND 12 76 Annual Mean <35 mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.035 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.035 p,p'-DDD EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01J04/2017 ND 42 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 140 07/O6/2017 ND 27 85 Annual Mean <43 mg/kg dry Plant 1 lOY24/2017 ND 0.034 0.11 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.034 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 35 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 110 07/O6/2017 ND 24 76 Annual Mean <35 mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.035 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.035 p,p'-DDE EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 42 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 140 07/06/2017 ND 12 85 Annual Mean <43 mg/kg dry Plant 1 10/24/2017 ND 0.034 0.11 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.034 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 35 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 110 07/06/2017 ND 11 76 Annual Mean <35 mg/kg dry Plant 2 10/24/2017 ND 0.035 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.035 p,p'-DDT EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 1 01J04/2017 ND 42 140 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 43 140 07/O6/2017 ND 29 85 Annual Mean <43 mg/kg dry Plant 1 1 OY24/2017 ND 0.034 0.11 Page 55 of 65 2017 OCSD eiosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location weight Cake Annual Mean <0.034 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01J04/2017 ND 35 120 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 33 110 07/O6/2017 ND 26 76 Annual Mean <35 mg/kg dry Plant 2 lOY24/2017 ND 0.035 0.12 weight Cake Annual Mean <0.035 Total DDTs EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plants 01/04/20171 ND -- Cake 04/05/2017 ND -- 07/O6/2017 ND -- 10/24/2017 ND -- Annual Mean ND EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01Y04/2017 ND -- Cake 04/05/2017 ND -- 07/O6/2017 ND -- 10/24/2017 ND -- Annual Mean ND Toxaphene EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plants 01Y04/2017 ND 1400 5600 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 041 0 5700 07/O6/2017 ND 790 3300 Annual Mean <1400 _ mg/kg dry Plant 1 lOY24/2017 ND 1.1 4.6 weight Cake Annual Mean <1.1 EPA 8081A pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 1200 4700 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 1100 4400 07/O6/2017 ND 700 3000 Annual Mean <1200 mg/kg dry Plant lOY24/2017 ND 1.2 4.7 weight (Cake Annual Mean <1.2 TCLP-Organochlorine Pesticides Chlordane EPA 8081 A- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.0010 0.0050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.0010 EPA 8081 A- mg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.0010 0.0050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.0010 Endrin EPA 8081A- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.00010 0.00050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.00010 EPA 8081A- mg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.00010 0.00050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.00010 gamma-BHC EPA 8081 A- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.00010 0.00050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.00010 EPA 8081 A- mg/L Plant 07/06/2017ND 0.00010 0.00050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.00010 Heptachlor EPA 8081A- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/201 NND 0.00020 0.00050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.00020 EPA 8081A- mg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.00020 0.00050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.00020 Heptachlor Epoxide EPA 8081 A- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.00020 0.00050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.00020 EPA 8081 A- mg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.00020 0.00050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.00020 Methoxychlor EPA 8081A- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/20 77 ND 0.00010 0.00050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.00010 EPA 8081A- mg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.00010 0.00050 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.00010 Toxaphene EPA 8081 A- mg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.0025 0.025 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.0025 EPA 8081 A- mg/L Plant 07/06/201 NND 0.0025 0.025 TCLP Cake Annual Mean <0.0025 _ STLC-Organochlorine Pesticides Aldrin EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.10 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.10 EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 2 07/06/2017 ND 0.50 2.5 Page 56 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location Cake Annual Mean <0.50 Chlordane EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 1.0 5.0 Cake Annual Mean <1.0 EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 5.0 25 Cake Annual Mean <5.0 Dieldrin EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.10 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.10 EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.50 2.5 Cake Annual Mean <0.50 Endrin EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.10 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.10 EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.50 2.5 Cake Annual Mean <0.50 gamma-BHC EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.10 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.10 EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.50 2.5 Cake Annual Mean <0.50 Heptachlor EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.15 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.15 EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.75 2.5 Cake Annual Mean <0.75 Metho rychlor EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.10 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.10 EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.50 2.5 Cake Annual Mean <0.50 Mirex EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.10 1.0 Cake Annual Mean <0.10 EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.50 5.0 Cake Annual Mean <0.50 o,p'-DDD EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.10 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.10 EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 07/06/2017N6 0.10 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.10 o,p'-DDE EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.10 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.10 EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.10 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.10 o,p'-DDT EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.10 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.10 EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.10 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.10 p,p'-DDD EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.10 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.10 EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.50 2.5 Cake Annual Mean <0.50 p,p'-DDE EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.10 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.10 EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.50 2.5 Cake Annual Mean <0.50 p,p'-DDT EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 0.10 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <0.10 EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 0.50 2.5 Cake Annual Mean <0.50 Total DDTs EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND Cake Annual Mean ND EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND Cake Annual Mean ND Toxaphene EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 1 07/06/2017 ND 2.5 25 Cake Annual Mean <2.5 EPA 8081 pg/L Plant 07/06/2017 ND 13 130 Cake Annual Mean <13 PCBs Page 57 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample (Sample Date Result MDL RL Location PCB 1016 EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 200 580 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 450 1300 07/06/2017 ND 420 1200 10/04/2017 ND 870 2600 Annual Mean <870 EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 170 510 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 420 1200 07/06/2017 ND 400 1200 10/04/2017 ND 790 2300 Annual Mean <790 PCB 1221 EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 200 580 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 450 1300 07/06/2017 ND 420 1200 10/04/2017 ND 870 2600 Annual Mean <870 EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 170 510 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 420 1200 07/06/2017 ND 400 1200 10/04/2017 ND 790 2300 Annual Mean <790 PCB 1232 EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 200 580 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 450 1300 07Y06/2017 ND 420 1200 10/04/2017 ND 870 2600 Annual Mean <870 EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 170 510 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 420 1200 07/06/2017 ND 400 1200 10/04/2017 ND 790 2300 Annual Mean <790 PCB 1242 EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 200 580 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 450 1300 07/06/2017 ND 420 1200 10/04/2017 ND 870 2600 Annual Mean <870 EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 170 510 (Cake 04I05/2017 ND 420 1200 07/06/2017 ND 400 1200 10/04/2017 ND 790 2300 Annual Mean <790 PCB 1248 EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 200 580 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 450 1300 07/06/2017 ND 420 1200 10/04/2017 ND 870 2600 Annual Mean <870 EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 170 510 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 420 1200 07/06/2017 ND 400 1200 10/04/2017 ND 790 2300 Annual Mean <790 PCB 1254 EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 200 580 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 450 1300 07/06/2017 ND 420 1200 10/04/2017 ND 870 2600 Annual Mean <870 EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 170 510 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 420 1200 07/06/2017 ND 400 1200 10/04/2017 ND 790 2300 Annual Mean <790 PCB 1260 EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 200 580 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 450 1300 Page 58 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units Sample Sample Date (Result MDL RL Location 07/06/2017 ND 420 1200 10/04/2017 ND 870 2600 Annual Mean <870 EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 170 510 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 420 1200 07/06/2017 ND 400 1200 l OY04/2017 ND 790 2300 Annual Mean X0 PCB_HR_DM EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 200 580 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 450 1300 07/06/2017 ND 420 1200 10/04/2017 ND 870 2600 Annual Mean <870 EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 170 510 Cake 04/05/2017 ND 420 1200 07/06/2017 ND 400 1200 10/04/2017 ND 790 2300 Annual Mean <790 Total PCBs EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND -- Cake 04/05/2017 ND -- 07/06/2017 ND -- 10/04/2017 ND -- Annual Mean ND EPA 8082 pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND -- Cake 04/05/2017 ND -- 07/06/2017 ND -- 10/04/2017 ND -- Annual Mean ND Herbicides 2,4,5-T EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 370 1300 Cake 07/06/2017 ND 12 44 Annual Mean <370 EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 320 1100 Cake 07/O6/2017 ND 11 40 Annual Mean <320 2,4,5-TP(Silvex) EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 260 1300 Cake 0 710 6/2 0 1 7 ND 18.5 44 Annual Mean <260 EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 220 1100 Cake 07/06/2017 ND 7.7 40 Annual Mean <220 2,4-D EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 810 1300 Cake 07/06/2017 ND 27 44 Annual Mean <810 _ EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 690 1100 Cake 07/06/2017 ND 24 40 Annual Mean <690 2,4-DB EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 490 1300 Cake 07/O6/2017 ND 16 44 Annual Mean <490 EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 410 1100 Cake 07/06/2017 ND 14 40 Annual Mean <410 4-Nitrophenol EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 500 5300 Cake 07/06/2017 ND 17 180 Annual Mean <500 EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 430 4600 Cake 07/O6/2017 ND 15 160 Annual Mean <430 Dalapon EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 1200 DNO 470 116000 Cake 07/06/2017 210 DNO 15 530 Annual Mean 700 DNO Page 59 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample (Sample Date (Result MDL RL Location EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 400 14000 Cake 07/06/2017 130 DNO 14 _ 480 Annual Mean 260 DNO _ Dicamba EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 310 1300 Cake 0 710 6/2 0 1 7 1ND 10 _ 44 Annual Mean <310 EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 260 1100 Cake 07/06/2017 ND 9.1 40 Annual Mean X0 Dichlorprop(2,4-DP)(EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 180 1300 Cake 07/06/2017 ND 5.9 44 Annual Mean <180 EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 150 1100 Cake 07/06/2017 ND 5.3 40 Annual Mean <150 _ Dinoseb(DNBP) EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01Y04/2017IND 740 8100 Cake 07/06/2017 ND 25 270 Annual Mean a40 EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 630 6900 Cake 07/06/2017 ND 22 240 Annual Mean <630 MCPA EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 31000 320000 Cake 07/06/2017 ND _ 1000 11000 Annual Mean <31000 EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 26000 280000 Cake 07/O6/2017 ND _ 910 9600 Annual Mean <26000 MCPP EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 27000 320000 Cake 07/06/2017 ND 910 11000 Annual Mean <27000 EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 23000 280000 Cake 07/06/2017 ND 820 9600 Annual Mean <23000 Pentachlorophenol EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 68 1300 Cake 07/06/2017 ND 2.2 44 Annual Mean <68 EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/, ND 58 1100 Cake 07/06/2017 ND 2.0 40 Annual Mean Picloram EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 290 1300 Cake 07/O6/2017 ND _ 9.6 44 Annual Mean <290 EPA 8151 pg/kg dry Plant 01/04/2017 ND 250 1100 Cake 07/06/2017 ND 8.6 40 Annual Mean <250 _ TCLP-Herbicides _ 2,4,5-T EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 6.2E-06 0.025 Cake Annual Mean <6.2E-06 _ EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 6.2E-06 0.025 Cake Annual Mean <6.2E-06 _ 2,4,5-TP(Silvex) EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 6.2E-06 0.025 Cake Annual Mean <6.2E-06 EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 6.2E-06 0.025 Cake Annual Mean <6.2E-06 2,4-D EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3.7E-06 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <3.7E-06 EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 3.7E-06 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <3.7E-06 2,4-DB EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 1.5E-05 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <1.5E-05 EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 1.5E-05 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <1.5E-05 Page 60 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units (Sample (Sample Date (Result MDL IRL Location 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 1.3E-05 0.10 acid Cake Annual Mean <1.3E-05 EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 1.3E-05 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <1.3E-05 4-Nitrophenol EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 2.6E-05 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <2.6E-05 EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 2.6E-05 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <2.6E-05 ACIFLUORFEN EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 8.9E-06 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <8.9E-06 EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 8.9E-06 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <8.9E-06 BENTAZON EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 1.0E-05 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <1.0E-05 EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 1.0E-05 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <1.0E-05 Chloramben EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 7.9E-06 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <7.9E-06 EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 7.9E-06 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <7.9E-06 Dalapon EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 1.0E-05 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <1.0E-05 EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 1.0E-05 0.50 Cake Annual Mean <1.0E-05 DCPA EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 8.7E-06 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <8.7E-06 EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 8.7E-06 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <8.7E-06 Dioamba EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 8.5E-06 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <8.5E-06 EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 8.5E-06 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <8.5E-06 Dichlorprop(2,4-DP) EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 1.5E-05 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <1.5E-05 EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 1.5E-05 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <1.5E-05 Dinoseb(DNBP) EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 1.6E-05 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <1.6E-05 EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 1.6E-05 0.10 Cake Annual Mean <1.6E-05 _ MCPA EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0017 12 Cake Annual Mean <0.0017 EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 0.0017 12 Cake Annual Mean <0.0017 _ MCPP EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.0019 12 Cake Annual Mean <0.0019 EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 01/04/2017ND 0.0019 12 Cake Annual Mean <0.0019 Pentachlorophenol EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 3.7E-06 0.025 Cake Annual Mean <3.7E-06 EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 3.7E-06 0.025 Cake Annual Mean <3.7E-06 Picloram EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 7.7E-06 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <7.7E-06 EPA 8151 mg/L Plant 01/04/2017 ND 7.7E-06 0.050 Cake Annual Mean <7.7E-06 Dioxins/Furans F1,23,4,6,7,8-HpCDD EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 120 0.90 27 Cake Annual Mean 120 EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 95 0.62 25 Cake Annual Mean 95 6,7,8-HpCDF EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 ND 21 27 Page 61 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units Sample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location Cake Annual Mean <21 EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 03/08/2017 ND 25 25 Cake Annual Mean <25 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 ND 15 27 Cake Annual Mean <15 EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 ND 21 25 Cake Annual Mean <21 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/OB/2017 1.0 DNQ 0.66 27 Cake Annual Mean 1.0 DNQ EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 0.93 DNQ 0.53 25 Cake Annual Mean 0.93 DNQ 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 ND 2.3 27 Cake Annual Mean <2.3 EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 3.0 DNQ 0.51 25 Cake Annual Mean 3.0 DNQ 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 ND 3.9 27 Cake Annual Mean <3.9 EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 3.6 DNQ 0.50 25 Cake Annual Mean 3.6 DNQ 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 4.0 DNQ 0.46 27 Cake Annual Mean 4.0 DNQ EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 6.8 DNQ 0.47 25 Cake Annual Mean 6.8 DNQ 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 2.5 DNQ 0.58 27 Cake Annual Mean IS DNQ EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 2.2 DNQ 0.45 25 Cake Annual Mean 2.2 DNQ 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 ND 0.33 27 Cake Annual Mean <0.33 EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 ND 0.33 25 Cake Annual Mean <0.33 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 ND 11 27 Cake Annual Mean <11 EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 ND 8.3 25 Cake Annual Mean <8.3 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 ND 1.3 27 Cake Annual Mean <1.3 EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 ND 0.43 25 Cake Annual Mean <0.43 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF IEPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 1.7 DNQ 0.36 27 Cake Annual Mean 1.7 DNQ EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 ND 1.4 25 Cake Annual Mean <1.4 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 ND 0.53 27 Cake Annual Mean <0.53 EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 1.2 DNQ 0.46 25 Cake Annual Mean 1.2 DNQ 2,3,7,8-TCDD EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 ND 0.77 5.9 Cake 03/08/2017 ND 0.46 5.5 04/05/2017 ND 0.71 11 07/06/2017 ND 1.6 28 10/04/2017 0.24 DNQ 0.14 2.5 Annual Mean 10.76 DNQ EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 ND 0.44 5.1 Cake 03/08/2017 ND 0.35 4.9 04/05/2017 ND 0.59 9.8 07/06/2017 ND 1.4 25 10/04/2017 ND 0.14 2.4 Annual Mean <1.4 2,3,7,8-TCDF EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 1.3 1.3 5.5 Cake Annual Mean 18.4 EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 4.1 DNQ 1.5 4.9 Page 62 of 65 2017 OCSD eiosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units Sample Sample Date -Result MDL RL Location Cake Annual Mean 4.1 DNO OCOD EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 1100 0.84 55 Cake Annual Mean 1100 EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 1200 0.72 49 Cake Annual Mean 1200 OCDF EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 75 0.32 55 Cake Annual Mean 75 EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/00017 97 0.40 49 Cake Annual Mean 97 Total HpCDD EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 250 0.90 27 Cake Annual Mean 250 EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 190 0.62 25 Cake Annual Mean 190 Total HpCDF EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 20 DNO 18 27 Cake Annual Mean 20 DNO EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 30 23 25 Cake Annual Mean 30 Total H%CDD EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 29 1.7 27 Cake Annual Mean 29 EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 27 0.49 25 Cake Annual Mean 27 Total H%COF EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 25 DNO 0.87 27 Cake Annual Mean 25 DNO EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 35 0.67 25 Cake Annual Mean 35 Total PeCDD EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 NO 37 37 Cake Annual Mean <37 EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 NO 24 25 Cake Annual Mean <24 Total PeCDF EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 28 0.91 27 Cake Annual Mean 28 EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 33 0.44 25 Cake Annual Mean 33 Total TCDD EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 5.3 DNO 0.46 5.5 Cake Annual Mean 5.3 DNO EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 1.1 DNO 0.35 4.9 Cake Annual Mean 1.1 DNO Total TCDF EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 1 03/08/2017 13 0.92 5.5 Cake Annual Mean 13 EPA 1613B pg/g dry Plant 2 03/08/2017 13 0.76 4.9 Cake Annual Mean 13 Other Chrysotile %dry weight Plant 1 01/04/2017 NO Cake 04/05/2017 NO 07/06/2017 NO 10/04/2017 NO Annual Mean NO %dry weight Plant 01/04/2017 NO Cake 04/05/2017 NO 07/06/2017 NO 1 0104/2 01 7 NO Annual Mean NO Paint Filter Free EPA 9095E - Plant 1 01/04/2017 NEG Liquid test Cake 02/01/2017 NEG 03/01/2017 NEG 04/O612017 NEG Annual Mean NEG EPA 9095E - Plant 01/04/2017 NEG Cake 0 2/0 212 0 1 7 NEG 03/01/2017 NEG 04/05/2017 NEG Annual Mean NEG Page 63 of 65 2017 OCSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location Tentatively Identified Compounds 1000147-77-7 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 10/04/2017 610000 3800 Cake 430000 7600 Annual Mean 520000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 04/05/2017 3400000 46000 Cake Annual Mean 3400000 17-(1,5- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 07/06/2017 3500000 54000 DIMETHYLHEXYL} Cake Annual Mean 3500000 10,13-DIMETHYL-2, 17-(1,5- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 04/05/2017 1900000 26000 DIMETHYLHEXYL} Cake Annual Mean 1900000 10,13- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 04/05/2017 3000000 46000 DIMETHYLHEX Cake Annual Mean 3000000 2,6,10,14,18,22- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 10/04/2017 75000 9100 TETRACOSAHEXA Cake Annual Mean 75000 ENE,2,6,10 758-16-7 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 10/04/2017 780 8600 3600 Cake 000 9100 Annual Mean 82000 9-OCTADECENOIC IEPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 390000 — 26000 ACID, (E} Cake 04/05/2017 400000 26000 07/06/2017 590000 54000 10/04/2017 58000 3800 59000 7600 Annual Mean 300000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 1100000 25000 Cake 04/05/2017 1300000 46000 07/06/2017 1100000 48000 10/04/2017 82000 3600 100000 — 9100 Annual Mean 740000 Cholest-4-en-3one EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 510000 26000 Cake 04/05/2017 500000 26000 10/04/2017 71000 7600 Annual Mean 360000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 520000 — 25000 Cake 04/05/2017 850000 46000 07106/2017 380000 48000 Annual Mean 580000 CHOLEST-B-EN-3- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 1300000 — 25000 OL,(3.BETA.)- Cake Annual Mean 1300000 Cholestan-3o1 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 07106/2017 4300000 — 54000 _ Cake Annual Mean 4300000 CHOLESTAN-3-OL, EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 150000 25000 (3.ALPHA.)- Cake Annual Mean 150000 Cholestan-3one EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 10/04/2017 62000 7600 Cake Annual Mean 62000 CHOLESTANE, 2,3- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 1200000 26000 EPDXY-, Cake Annual Mean 1200000 (2.ALPHA.,3.ALPH CHOLESTANE, 3- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 04/05/2617 840000 46000 ETHOXY-, Cake Annual Mean 840000 (3.BETA.,5.ALPHA. CHOLESTANOL EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 04/O5/2017 320000 — 26006 Cake 07/06/2017 460000 — 54000 Annual Mean 390000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 2200000 — 25000 Cake 04/05/2017 440000 — 46000 10/04/2017 450000 — 3600 470000 — 9100 Page 64 of 65 2017 0CSD Biosolids Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Parameter Method Units ISample Sample Date Result MDL RL Location Annual Mean 890000 CHOLESTEROL EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 10/04/2017 130000 9100 Cake Annual Mean 130000 CYCLOTETRASILO EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 10/04/2017 23000 3800 XANE, Cake Annual Mean 23000 OCTAMETHYL- HEPTADECANE,9- EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 10/04/2017 20000 3800 OCTYL- Cake Annual Mean 20000 n-Hendecanoic acid EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 04/05/2017 1100000 — 126000 Cake 07/06/2017 1300000 — 54000 10/04/2017 130000 — 3800 170000 — 7600 Annual Mean 680000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 04/05/2017 3100000 — 46000 Cake 07/06/2017 2700000 — 48000 10/04/2017 150000 — 3600 230000 — 9100 Annual Mean 1500000 OCTADECANOIC EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 04/05/2017 370000 — 26000 ACID Cake 07/06/2017 400000 — 54000 10/04/2017 41000 — 3800 61000 — 7600 Annual Mean 220000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 04/05/2017 940000 — 46000 Cake 07/06/2017 700000 — 48000 10/04/2017 80000 — 9100 Annual Mean 570000 Squalene EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 190000 — 25000 Cake 10/04/2017 140000 — 3600 Annual Mean 160000 Tetracosane EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 10/04/2017 56000 — 3600 Cake Annual Mean 56000 Tetradecane EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 180000 — 26000 Cake Annual Mean 180000 TETRADECANOIC EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 07/06/2017 230000 — 48000 ACID Cake Annual Mean 230000 UNKNOWN EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 240000 — 26000 Cake 04/05/2017 400000 — 26000 07/06/2017 580000 — 54000 10/04/2017 120000 — 3800 87000 — 7600 Annual Mean N/A EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 450000 — 25000 Cake 04/05/2017 720000 — 46000 07/06/2017 370000 — 48000 10/04/2017 150000 — 3600 330000 — 9100 Annual Mean N/A VITAMIN E EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 1 01/04/2017 180000 — 26000 Cake Annual Mean 1180000 EPA 8270C pg/kg dry Plant 2 01/04/2017 270000 — 25000 Cake Annual Mean 270000 Definitions: ND=Not Detected DNQ=Detected,Not Quantified;represents estimated values above the method detection limit(MDL),but below the reporting limit(RL). N/A=Not Applicable Annual Mean: If all results for a parameter were ND,the Annual Mean is reported as<fine highest MDL for that parameter dunng the year. If only some results for a parameter were ND,the ND is replaced by the MDL value for calculating the Annual Mean For any parameter that had a DNQ result,the Annual Mean is also designated as DNQ. Page 65 of 65 APPENDIX D EPA Biosolids Annual Report Electronic Form for Reporting Year 2017, Plant No. 1 EPA Biosolids Annual Report Electronic Form for Reporting Year 2017, Plant No. 2 plat Sewage Sludge (Biosolids)Ann03.48port FPARegulations-503.18,503.28,503.48 INSTRUCTIONS FPA's sewage sludge regulations l40(PRoan 5031 require certain POI Ws and Gass Isewage sludge management facilities to submit to an annual biosolids report.POWs that must submit an annual report include POTWs with a design flow rate equal to or greater than one million gallons per day,and POTWs that serve 10,000 people or mom.lhis is the biosolids annual report form for POlWs and(lass Isewage sludge management facilities in the 42 states and strikes and termorks where bPAadmiantem the Fedemlbiosolids program. For the purposes ofthls form,the term'sewaee sludge also rekm to the material that is commonly re&rod to as biosolids.'FPAdoes not have a regulatory definition for biosolids but this material is commonly referred to as wage sludge that is placed on,or applied to the land to use the beneficial properties ofthe material as a sod amendment,conditkneq or fertilGer.PPA3 use ofthe term biosolids'in this form is to confirm that information about beneficiallyused sewage sludge(aka.biosofids)shoukd be reported on this form. Please note that questions with a(4)are required.Please also note that ERAmay contact you after you submit this report for more information regarding your sewage sludge program. Questions regarding this form should be directed to the NPDR3 Electronic Reporting Iklpdeskac •NPDBSeRepoftwgQpa.gov OR •1-877-2274965 What action would you hike to take?' New 9osolids Pmgmm Report I.Program Information Please select the NPDPS m number below for this Sewage Sludge(9osolids)Annual argon.' C 110604:Orange County SD 41 INJPORTANT-Ifyou do not see the NPDFS 1D associated with your facility(i.e.,you only see a blue bar in the above drop down fist,you M to How the instmit ion s in the'Hosolids User's GuideJ'Ashofter set of instmctluns to fix this issue are in the'In Pon ant Instmctmas on Acre sum g YourNPDFS m"docoment.Both documents are located at:bu psl/eoanet amdeskcom/hc/en-us/mctionsi207108787-Geneml-Nosohds. Facifity Name:Orange County SD#1 Street: 10844 Ellis Avenue City:FOUNTAIN VA11 FV State:CA Zip Code:92708-7018 1.1 Please selectat kartone ofthe following optionsperniming to yourobhgation to submit a Sewage Sludge(Biosohds)Annual Report in compliance with 40S 593.lhe fecilhyis:' Za P0T9with a design flow rate equal to or greater than one million gallons per day ZaPOTVthat serves 10,000 people or more Z a Class I Mudge Management Facihtyas defined to 40 CElt5039 otherwise required to report(e.g.,permit condilion,embreement action) none ofthe above Page 1 of 23 1.2 Reporting Period Start and ad Dates Start Date ofReporting Period• ad Date of Reporting Period• 01-01-2017 12-31-2017 2.Facilitymfr mation 2.19osofids or Sewage Sludge Treatment Processes Please check the box net to the following biosofids or sewage sludge treatment processes that you used on the sewage sludge or bioaoPda generated or produced at your facility during the reporting period(check one or more that apply).* Pathogen Reduction Operations(see App andix Bto Part 503) Physical Treatment Operations Processes to Significantly Reduce Pathogens(PSRPI ® Preliminary Operations(e.g.,sludge grind'mg,degritting,blend'mg) Aembie Digestion ® 'llaickxning(e.g,gravity and/or flotation thickening,centrifugation,belt fikerpress,vacuum filter) Air Lkymg(or`sludge drying beds') ❑ Sludge Lagoon ® Anaerobic Oigestion Other Processes to Manage Sewage Sludge ❑ Lower Temperature Composting ❑ Temporary Sludge Storage(sewage sludge stored on land 2 years or less,not m sewage sludge unit) ❑ Lime Stab Rication ❑ Lang-term Sludge Storage(sewage sludge stored on land 2 years or more,not in sewage sludge unit) Processes to Further Reduce Patbonena(PPRP) ® Methane orRagas Capture and Recovery Lfigher Temperature Composting ❑ Other Treatment Process: Lbat Drying(e.g,flash dryer,sproydryegromry dryer) LLeat Treatment(Liquid sewage sludge is heated to temp.of356T(or I80`Qorhgher for 30 min.) Thermophik,Aerobic Digestion ❑ Bata Ray Irradiation ❑ Gamma Rayhradiation ❑ Pasteurization 2.2 Ek sofids or Sewage Sludge Analytical Methods EPA mgulatons specify that representative samples ofsewage sludge that is applied to the land,placed on a suffice disposal site,or fired in a sewage sludge incinerator must be collected and analyzed,these regulations also specify the analytical methods that must be used to analyze samples ofsewage sludge.For example,EPArequhes facilities to monitor for the certain parameters,which are listed in Tables 1,2,3,and d at 40 CPR503.13 and nbles 1 and 240 QT1503 23.See also 40 CFR503.8. Please check the box net to the following analytic methods used on the sewage sludge or bioaolids generated or produced byyou or put facility during the reporting period(check one or more that apply) Parameter Method Number or Author Descrip tion Text for Certification Section Pathogens Sludge Monitoring-Ascaris ova. Sludge Monitoring-Awaris ova,'Test Method for Detecting,Enumerating,and Determwmg the Ybflky Awards in Sludge Astoria ova. (AppendxL),"Control of Pathogens and sector Attraction in Sewage Sludge",lq`"25-R-92-013,July 2003 Other Awaris ova.Analytical Method: Page 2 of 23 Parameter Method Number or Author Descrip tion Text for C rtiHcation Section ASTM Method D4994-Enteric Causes ASIMMethod D4994-Boncrdo Yvuses,"Standard Practice for Recovery afl5ruses From Wastewater Sludges,"ASTM International Enteric comes Othar Enteric Causes Analylical Mathod: � Standard Method 9222-Fecal Cohform Standard Method 9222-Fecal Califonq'5tandard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater;'American Public Health Association[Note:This method is only allowable Inc Class Bsewage sludge] Standard Method 9221-Fecal Conform Standard Method 9221-Fecal Colifonn,'5tandard Methods bar the Examination of Water and Wastewater,"American Public Health Association Fecalcobfcar F1EPAMelbod 1680-Fecal Colform EPAMethod 1680-Fecal Coform,'Pecal Coldness in Sewage Sludge by[vuniple-Tube Fermentation using lauryl Tryptose Foods � EPAMethod 1681-Fecal Coliforn suit EC3Aadimn,"EPA.821-IF10-003,April 2010 EPAMethod 1681-Fecal Colfmm,Fecal Colfonms in Sewage Sludge(E4osolds)bybhhipdeTabe Fermentation using hl Other Fecal Coliforrm Analytical Method: medium,ITM21-Ib04-027,1une 2005 WA Yanko Method-Hehmmth ova. WA Yanko Method-Helmmth Ova,'Dccurrence of Pathogens in Distribution and Marketing MardeipalSludges," Helmmth ova. EPA-6W-1-87-014,1987 Other Helminth ova.Analytical Method: Standard Method 9260-Salmonella Standard Method 9260-Salmonella,'Sandard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastawatev"American Public Health Association � EPAMmhmI 1692-Saaunra EPAMethod 1682,"Salmonella in Sewage Sludge(Rowboat by Modeled Semisolid Rappaport-Cassiliadis(MSRV)Medium," Sahnouella sP �cterla EPA,821-E-06-014,July 2006 ❑ Renner and Clark Metbod-SSMonella Fenner and Clark Method-Sslmonella,`DateCNon and Enumeration ofSahmonalls and Psaudommus aamginosa:1.Water ❑ Other Salmonella sp.Fortran Analytical Method: Pollution Control Federation,46(9C 163-2171,1974 Class ASludge Monitoring-Total Onlmrable Moses EPA Class A Sludge Monitoring-TotalCplumb le Mmaes,"Method bar the Recovery and Assay oflotal Cultumble Causes from Total Crlturable Causes Sludge(Appendix H),"Control ofPathogens and M:etor Attraction in Sewage Sludge,ll`"25-Ib92-013,Judy 2003 Other Total Crhurable Viruses Analytical Method: Metals ® EPAMetlod 6010-Arsenic QCPAFS) EPA Method 6010-Arsenic(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/Ommical Methods,"EPAPob.SW-846 � EPAMethod 6020- irmorie(ICP-MS) EPA Method 6020-Arsenic inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ Chemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 Arsenic � EPAMethod T010-Arsenic(GF-AAS) EPA Method 9010-Among;(Cmaphits Mmace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry),'Test Methods for EAaluating Solid Waste, EPAMethod 9061-2insame(AA-Cell) Physical/Clumical Methods('EPA Pub.SW-846 EPA Method'l061-Arsenic(Atomic Absorption-Gaseous Hydride),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/Qemical Other Arsenic Asaytical Method: Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ® EPAMmhmI 6010-Bery11ium 0CP-OES) EPA Method 6010-Berylhum(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physieal/Co mical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 F] EPAMethpd 6020-Berythum(ICP-MS) EPA Method 6020-Beryllium driductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spactmmatry),'Teat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physlcal/Uemical Methods;'EPA Pub.5 W-846 BeryPium � IPAMethod T000-Beryllium(FAAS) EPA Method 9000-BerylliumMaine komic Abarntion Spectrophotometryk'Test Methods for Evaluating S4id Waste,Physical/ EPAMethod 7010-Beryllium Chemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 (Qr-Aqq) EPA Method 7010-Beryllium(Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectmpbotometry),'Test Methods Poi Evaluating Solid Other Wryllurm Analytical Method Waste,PhysicaVUemical Methods,"EPAsub.SW-846 Page 3 of 23 Parameter Method Number or Author Ecscrip Non Text for Csrti6catum Section ® IPAMetbod 6010-Cadmium(1CP-0W EPA Method 6010-Cadmvrm(Inducthely Coupled Plasma-OpCsal Emission Spectrometry),"hst Methods forE duatlug Solid Waste,Physical/Oremical Methods,"EPAPob.SW-846 ❑ EPAMethod 6020-Cadmium 0e-MS) EPAMethod 6020-Cadmlum(rnductively(buph:d Plasma-Mess Spectrometry),'Ted Methods for Evalumlug Solid Waste, EPAMethod 7000-Cadmium(FAAS) PhysieaVChcmiwl Methods,"IPAPub.W-846 Cadmium ❑ IPAMethod]000-Cadmlum(Wame Atomic Absorption$pectrophotometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaV EPAMethod 7010-Cedmium(OF-AAS) Otemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW4146 EPAMethod 7010-Cadmium(Graphite Fumace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry),^test Methods for Evaluating Sobd ❑ FPAMethod 7131-Cadmium(GF-AAS) Waste,Physiea/aemieal Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ❑ Other Cadmium Analytical Method: IPAMcthod 7131-Cadmium(Graphee Fumace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaVCbemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 EPAMethod 6010-(]rrommm f"-OES) EPAMethod 6010-Ummium(Induetively Coopled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/Chemical Methods,"FPAPub.SW-846 ❑ FPAMethod6020-armum(ICP-MS) IPA Method 6020-Qmmium deductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Test Metbods for Evaluating Solid Waste, PhysicaVQemical Methods,"IPA Pub.SW-846 ❑ FPAMethod]000-(Lromvm(FAA$) IPA Method]000-ammium(Flame Atoms Absorption Spectrophotometryh"list Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Otromium ❑ IPAMethod]010-Chmmmm(ff-AAS) PhyaicaVOremsal Methods,"FPAPub.SW-846 MA Method 7010-Oiromium(Graphite pomace Atom's Absorption Spectrophotomelry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid ❑ IPAMethod 7191-Chmmium Waste,PhysicaVlTemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 (A F1) IPAMethod]191-Ommium(Atomic absorption-FurnacePechnique),'Teat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ Olherllromwn Analytical Method: Otemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW4146 ® FPAMetbod 6010-Capper(1CP-OES) IPAMethod 6010-Copper(hrducliveb Coupled Plasma-Opticallanission 5pectromens),7esl Methods for Evaluating Solid Weste,PhysicaVaemical Methods,"FPAPub.SW-846 EPAMethod 6020-Copper(ICP-MS) IPAMethod 6020-Capper(Inductiveb Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Teat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ Oremical Methods,"EPAPub.SW4i46 Capper ❑ FPAMeNod 7000-Copper(FAA$) IPA Method 7000-Capper(FemeArcane Absorption Spectrophotometry),'Teat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ EPAMethod]010-Copper(GF- Ommical Methods,"EPAPub.SW346 AAS) EPAMethod]010-Capper d5raphne Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectropbotometryb'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, ❑ Other Capper Analytical Method: Physical/a,ra al Methods;'IPAPub.SW--846 ® IPAMethod 6010-lead(IP-OES) IPA Method 6010-Icad(luduetiecly Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),^feat Methods for Evaluating%Lid Waste, PhysicaVChcmical Methods,"IPA Pub.SW-846 ❑ IPAMethod 6020-lend 0CP-MS) EPAMrthod 6020-land(luductively Coupled Plasma-WasSpectrometryZ'Tesl Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaV EPAMsdmd]000-Iead(FAAS) Qcndeal Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 lead ❑ MA Method 7000-Iead(Home Atomic Absorption SpectrophotomertI'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ IPAMetbod 9010-land(C£-AAS) Chemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 IPA Method 7010-lead((haphde Pomace Atomic Absorption Spectropbotometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Sohd Waste, ❑ FPAMethod 7421-Iead(AA-F1) PhyslcaVUemiral Metbods,"IPA Pub.W-846 MA Method]421-lead(Atomic Absorption-Fumace Techniquet'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,MmicaVUemical ❑ OIM1erlead Analytical lvS lhod: Methods,'EPAPub.SW446 ® EPA Method 7471-Memory(CVAA) IPA Method 7471-Mercury in Solid or Semi-Solid Waste(Culd Vapor Atomic Ansoprtion),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Mercury. Waste,PhysicaVOremical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ❑ OIM1er MercuryAnalNical Method: Page 4 of 23 Parameter Method Number or Author Description Text for Certification Section ® EPAMetbod 6010-Molybdenum(IB-06) EPA Method 6010-Molybdenum(fnductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Enousfn Spectrometry),'Test Methods bar Evaluatng Solid Waste,Physicallaemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-W EPAMethod 6020-Moybdenum(12P-MS) EPAMethod 6020-Molybdenum(Inductively Qupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, ❑ EPAMetbod]000-Molybdenum(FAAS) PhysiaVQemical Methods"EPAPub.SW--846 EPAMethad 7000-Molybdenum(Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometryx'Test Methods fr Ecalusting Solid Waste, Molybdenum ❑ ppAMethod]010-Molybdenum(GF-AAS) PhysicaV4temical Methods"FPAPub.SW-846 EPAMethod 7010-Molybdenum(Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid ❑ EPAMethod 7481-Molybdenum Waste,PhysicaVQemical Methods,"FPAPub.SW-846 (M-FT) FPAMelhod]481-Molybdenum(Atomic Absorption-Fumace Technique),"Isso Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ Other Molybdenum Analytical Method: acindal Matlmds,"EPAPub.SW-846 ® EPAMethod 6010-Nlclmld(GP-OES) EPAMethod 6010-Nickel(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),'Test Methods far Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaVQem ical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 EPAMethod 6020-Nickel(ICP-MS) EPAMethod 6020-Nickel(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Test Metbods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaV Nickel EPAMethod -Nlcke hod 7000l(FAAS) aturial Methods,"EPAPub.SW4146 ❑ EPAMethod 7000-Nickel(Flame Atom's Absorption Spectrophotometry),'Test Methods fin Evaluating Solid Waste,Physica/ ❑ EPAMethod 7010-Nckd(GF- Qemial Methods,"ETAPub.SW446 AAS) EPAMethod 7010-Nickel(Omphite Pomace Atomic Absorption Spectropbotometry),'Test Methods for E4aluating Solid Waste, ❑ Other Nickel Analytical Method: MysicaVQemical Methods"EPAPub.SW--846 ® EPAMetbod 6010-Selenium QIG 0135) EPAMethod 6010-Selenium(Inductively Quphrd Plasma-Optical 5nission Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysiaVQemical Methods;'FPAPob.SW-846 ❑ EPAMethod 6020-Selenium 9CP-MS) EPA Method 6020-Selerandflductively Qupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Test Methods bar Embattling Solid Waste, PhysicaVQemical Methods;'EPA Pub.SW-846 ❑ EPAMethod]010-Belevium(GF-AAS) EPA Method 7010-Selenium(GrapMte Furnace Atomic Absorption SpaidmphmometryZ Teat Methods for Evaluating Solid Selenium ❑ EPAMethod]]40-Rdenhm(A Ff) Waste,Physicallasmical Methods;'EPAPob.SW-846 EPA Method]]4IA-Selemum(Atomic Absorption-Furnace Techniquex'Test Methods bar Ebaluathrg Solid Waste,PhysicaV ❑ FPAMethod]]41-Rdeulum Qemicul Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 (AMGfq EPA Method]]41-Selenium(Atomic Absorption-Gaseous Hydride),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysleaVQemical ❑ Other Selenium Analytical Method: Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 ® EPAMethod 6010-ZmC(1B4]ES) EPAMethod 6010-Z.mc daductively Qupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, PhysiaVQemial Methods"EPAPub.SR-846 ❑ EPAMetbod 6020-Zvic(KP MS) EPAMethod 6020-Zise(InductivelyCoupled Plasma-Mass Spsctrometq), est Methods frEvaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ Qemical Methods,"FPAPub.SW446 live ❑ FPAMethod]000-Zfe(FAAS) EPA Method]000-Zinc(Flame Atomic Absorption SpeclmphotometryZ7bat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ EPAMetbod]010-Zinc(U-AA8) Qemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 EPAMothod 7010-Smc(Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption SpectrophotometryZ"fast Methods for Braluating Solid Waste, ❑ Other2 rAnalytical Method: PhysicaVQemical Methods,"EPA Pub.SW--846 Nitrogen Qmpounds ❑ EPAMethod 350.1-Ammonia Nitrogen EPAMethod 350.1-Ammonia Ntrogen,"Determmatfn ofe rnonia Nitrogen by Semidurtomated Qbrimetry,"Angust 1993 Ammonu Nitrogen ® Standard Method 4500-NH3-Adromm Nitrogen Standard Method 4500-NIE3-Yamamoto Nitrogen,Ikandard Methods fin the Examination of Water and Wastewater"American Public Heakh Association ❑ Other Ammonia Nitrogen Analytical Method Page 5 of 23 Parameter Method Number or Author Nscrip tion Text for 4rti6catiov Section � EPAMetbod 9056-Nitrate Nitrogen(IC) FPAMethod 9056-Nitrate Nitrogen den Otmmatography),slest Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysiaVOremical Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 � EPAIAadmd 9210-Nitrate Nitrogen OSFJ EPAMethod 9210-Nitrate Nitrogen Onn-Selective Hectrode),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaVUtemical Methods,"EPAPub.SWb46 ® Otber Mtrete Nitrogen Analytical Method: PA 300.0 Nitrate Nitrogen ® Standard Method 4500-N-Nitrogev Standard F Method 4500-N-Nitrogen,"Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater;'Amric ean Muc h alth Nitrogen Association (tatter Nitrogen Malytical Method- Standard Method 4500-Norg-Organic Nitrogen Standard Method 4500-Norg-Organic Nitrogen,Ikandard Metbods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,"American Public Health Assomatom ® Otber ttrganic Nitrogen Analytical Method: C Iva anon:Until July 2017,0 was calculating based on Total Organic Nitrogen is the sum oflKN,Nitrate and Nitrite. TEN is analyzed by UA3512;Nitrate and Mtnts by FPA300.0 as stated above. Organic Nitrogen ® FPAMethod 351.2-Total Rehlahl Nitrogen EPA Method 3512-Total Ig,didahl Nitrogen,Metermnation ofTotal IgeldAd Nitrogen by Semi-Automated Colorimetry,"August Total lgeldahl Nitrogen 1993 Other Total KjeWahl Nitrogen Analytical Method: Other Analytes Standard Method 2540-Fixed Solids Standard Method 2540-Total,fixed,and volatile solids,"Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater," Fired Solids American Public Health/sssociation Other Fixed Solids Analytical Method: ® EPAMetbod 9095-Paint Fiber liquids Test EPA Method 9095-Fund Fiber liquids Test,7cat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhyssaVOrcmical Methods,"EPAPub. Pant Filter Test SW-946 Other Pent Filter Test Analytical Method: � EPAMethod 9040-pHFs 7%solids) EPA Method 9040-PHF,7%solicists1bat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhyseaVOtemcal Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 PH ® EPAMetbod 9045-PH(>7%soWs) EPAMethod 9045-pH(>7%sofids),'Test Mobods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhyskaVOtemical MethodSJ'EPA Pub.SW-846 Otber pH Malytical Method: Standard Method 2710-SOUR Standard Method 2710-Speci&Oxygen Uptake Rate,"Standard Methods for the F Examination of Water and WastewateTJ' Specific Oxygen Uptake American Public Health Association Rate Other Specific Oxygen Uptake Fate Analytkal Method: ® EPAMethod 13 11-Toxicity ChareaerisHc leaching EPA Method 1311-Toxicity Oraracteristic leaching Procedure,'ast Methods for Evaluating Sofid Waste,PhydcaVOremioal TCIP Procedure Methods,'EPAPub.5W446 Otbct'ICTP,imdyticad Method: Page 6 of 23 Parameter Method Number or Author I scription Text for Certification Section ❑ Standard Method 2550-Temperature Standard Method 2550-Temperature,Standard Methods for the Permutation of Water and Wastewater,"American Public Health Temperature Association ❑ Other TemperatureAnalytical Method: ® Standard Method 2540-Total Solids Standard Method 2540-Total,fixed,and volatile solids,Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater;' Total9oLds American Public Health Association ❑ Other Total Solids Analytical Method: ® Standard Method 2540-Melanie Solids Standard Method 2540-Total,fixed,and volatile solids,'Standard Methods 6r the Examination of Water and Wastewater," Volatile Solids Amcrican Public Health Jassociation ❑ Other Wlame Solids Analytical Method: No Analytical Methods ❑ No Analytical Methods Used 23 What is the estimated total volume ofbiosolids or sewage sludge produced at your lucilily for the reporting period(in dry metric loneyl" 21017 3.Hos ifids or Sewage Sludge Management PPANPDLS regulations at 40 M503 only require reporting fur kind application,surface disposal,or incineration.You have the option to select'"her Management Practice-ifyou wish to provide more information on how you manage your sewage sludge or biusolids. Please use the selections below to identify how sewage sludge or biosolids generated or produced at your facility was managed,used,or disposed by you or your facility for the reportmg period.You can use the button below to add as many Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(S )sections as needed to describe how you manage your sewage sludge. SSUID Section Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(SSUm):001 Management Practice Type Handler,Preparer,or Applier Type• Management Practice 4tail' Land Application Off-Site Third-Parry Handler or Applier Agricultural land Applicatan Please Note:Land Application includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give away)of(3ass AEQ.`OffSite Third-Party Handler or Applier mites to third parties which do not change the quality ofthe Biosohds.'Dff- Site Third-Party Prepame'refrs to a third patty wish changes the quality ofthe Iiosolids. Bids or lag/Container* Pathogen Class* W1ume Amount(drymOmi tons)* Hall, Class B 363 Pollutant Concentrations: Did the teary land apply bulk sewage sludge when one or more pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentration in Table 3 of40 CPB503.137" OYes Oi No O Unknown Name of Off-Site Third-Parry Handler,Preparer,or Applier for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information forthe OR-Site Third-Party Handler,Prepare,or Appherfrrthis Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier.You mayoptionally lookup a NPDPSIDro anto-populate this information.Iffields remain blank after clicking the lookup button,then no data exists and you must enterthe information. Off-Site Third-Party Handler,Prepare,or Applier Information NPDBSID(ffknown) Page 7 of 23 Facilay/Company Name" T le Ranch/Ag-Tech Addrea 43N EAshknA. ay* State" Zip Code" Fresno "mu 93726 Off-Site Third-Party}Iandler,Prepareq or Applier Contact Information First Name• lest Name Title' Amen Magan Owner Phone(10digits,No dasbes)' W. &Mad Address 5599709432 kuft&) stexp.com Mosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to s entify the pathogen reduction options used by your facility far this sewage sludge unque identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply). Cade Pathogen Reduction Option Class A(must also demonstrate that meet fecal col8arm or salmonella limits) ❑ BI Class B-Ahemative I Fecal Callum Geometric Mean B21 Class BAltemativc 2 PSRP L Armbc Digestion R22 CcmMemative 2 PSRP 2:An Drying ® B23 Class gNtermarw 2 PSRP 3:Anaerobic Digestion B24 Oars Memative 2 PSRP 4:Composting B25 Class PAltemative 2 PSRP 5:IBne Stabilization ❑ M Class Mernative 3:PSRP Equivalency pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Page 8 of 23 Bioselids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by put facility or anotherperson/facilitytorthis sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply). Vector Attraction Reduction Options ® VR1 Option l-Wlitde Solids Reduction VR2 Option 2-Bench-Scale VAntde Solids Reduction(Anaerobic Beach Teat) ❑ VR3 Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Amiable Bench Test with Percent Solids ofTwo percent or less) VR4 Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake are ❑ VR5 Option 5-Aerabic Poncessang Obe,nophilic Aerobic Digestion/Composting) VR6 Option 6-Alkaline Treatment W Option 7-Drying(Bgnot to or treater than 95 Percent) mut Option 8-Drymg(FA ral to or Greater than 90 Percent) VR9 Option 9-Sewage Sludge Injection ® MU Option I0-Sewage Sludge Tnnely lucorporation into land ❑ VRII Option II-Sewage sludge Covered at the End ofPach Operating Day Noncom,liance Rammamn Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPA's Federal sewage sludge program requirements(see 40 CF1003)for this facility during the repotting period.&A notes that any person who prepares sewage sludge(e.,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a material from sewage sludge)shall ensure that the app 0cab le requirements in&Ks biosodds regulations(40 CFR5033 are met when the sewage sludge is applied to the land,placed on a surface disposal site,or feed in a sewage sludge incinerator(see 40Q 5039). Land Application Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or sold or gave away sewage sludge in a bag or other container when one ormore pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceding pollutant limit(sac Table 1 of40 CPR503 13). Facility Failed to properly collect and analyze its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequency and approved analytical methods as order to obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding times)(see permit requirements and 40(M003 8). Facility had deficiencies with pathogen reduction(see 40 CFR509 321. ❑ Facility bad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 tTR 503331. Mod application ofbulk sewage sludge likely to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 ofthe Endangered Species Act orits designated criticalhabimt(see 40i 09141ay1. Brlksewage sludge was app Red to agricultural land,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation she that was flooded,frozen,or snow-covered such that the bulksewage sludge entered a wetland orotherwaters of the United States,as defined to 40 CPR 112 2 except as provided in a permit issued pursuant to Section 402 or 404 ofthe(AA(sec 40 CPR 503 14(b)). ❑ Bilk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,or reclamation site was 10 meters or less from waters ofthe United States,as defined io 40(11122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(see 40 CPR503.I4(c)1. Bulk sewage sludge was appbed to agrculterral land,forest,a pub he contact she,or reclamation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate for the bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofs reclamation site,otherwise specified by the permitting authority(see 40 M503.14I1)k Page 9 of 23 One or more label or information sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given may for land application(see 400R503146ell. Bak,sewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 4503 13(b)(24 have been reached. The required notice and information was not provided to the land application applier(see 40 CFR503 12(B and fell. The required notice and orientation was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40 IRR503.12(1l). The required notice was not provided to the permitting authority for the Stale in which bulk sewage sludge was applied tithe bulk sewage sludge was applied to land in a Slate other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40 CFR503 IN)and 6p ❑ The facility faded to keep the necessary records for preparers and appliers during the reporting period(see 40 CFR50327) When sewage sludge that meets acts Bpathogen reduction requirements,but not Qass A is applied to the land,additional site reatiictions must be met.Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPA'sFedeml sewage sludge aass Bpathogen reduction requirements(see 40 M50331 for this facility during the reporting period. Food crops with harvested pans that touched the sewage sludge/soil mature(such as melons,cucumbers,squash,etc.)were harvested witbin 14 months after application ofsewage sludge(see 40 CFR503 320b951 Vail with harvested pans the soil surface(root cro r pssuchas potatoes,taots,radishes)were harvested within 20 months after application ofsewage sludge and the sewage sludge remained on the Ind surface for four months or longer ngerprior to incorporation into the soil(see 60 CFR50332fbN5NJ11. Food crops with harvested pans below the sod surface(root crops such as potatoes,carrots,rodishes)were harvested within 38 months after application ofthe sewage sludge and the sewage sludge remained on the land surface for ess than for months priorto incorporation into the soil(see 40 GFR503.32(b)(5)(it Food crops,fed crops,and hoer crops were harvested within 30 days after application ofsewage sludge(me 40 CFR 503 32(bN5NivR Animas were grand on a site within 30 days after application ofsewage sludge(see 40 CFR503 32(b)(SNv)). ❑ Tudwas harvested within 1 year after application ofeewage sludge ifthe turfwas placed on land with a high potential for public exposures or lawn,unless otherwise specified by the perm@ting authority(see 40 M50332(b)(5Yvi11. Public access to land with high potential for public exposure was not restricted for 1 year after application ofsewage sludge(see 40 CFR503.32(bN5Nvulk Public access to land with a low potential for public exposure was not restricted mr30 days after application ofsewage sludge(see 40 CFR503 32(bNSNviiill. SS Section Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier ISSUED):002 Management Practice Type Handler,Prepareq or Appber Type' Management Practice Detail' Land App hcntion Off-Site Third-Party Prepare, Distribution and Marketing-Compost Please Note:Iand Application includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give away)of0ass ABQ.'OffSYte Thud-Party Handler or Applier're fen to third parties which do not change the quality ofthe elosolids."Ofi Site Third-Party Paeparer'refrs to a third party which changes the quality ofthe eiosolids. Balk or flag/(Dontainer• Pathogen Uase' Warne Amount(drymetnic tons)" Bulk Oa.AEQ(aale/giveaway) I4803 Pollutant Concentrations: Did the facility land apply bulk sewage sludge when one or more pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentration in Table 3 rf40�?" OYes Q No O Unknown Name of0ff-Sites nird-Party Handler,Prepareq or Applier for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information inrthe Off-Site Third-Party Handler,Prepareq or Appler mrths Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier.You mayoptionallyluokup a blPDPS]Dto auto-populate this information.Iffields remain blarakaftemheiring the Lookup buron,than no data exists and you must enterthe information. OR-Site Third-Party Handler,Prepareq or Applier Information Page I0 of 23 NPD®D(ifkvowv) Facility/Company Name" Synagro-Nursery Products Address PO Be,1439 City" &ate• Zip Code" Helendale "ru 92342 Off-Site Third-Party Handler,Prepareq or Applier Contact Information Fast Name Lest Name' Title' Venny Vasquez Sae Manager Phone(10-0igits,Nodashes)' Isa. &Mad Address 7602655210 vvasquez@gynagm.com Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Phrase use the selections below to identify the pathogen reduction options used by your facility for this sewage sludge unique identifier for me reporting period(check one or more that apply). Cade Pathogen Reduction Option Class A(must also demonstrate that meet fecal coliform or salmonella limits) Al /ass A-Alternative l:Time/Temperature A2 (ass AAltemative2:pH/Temperamre/Pementsobds A3 (ass A-Ahemative3:Test 5rteric Vanses and Helmmth ova;Operating Parameters A4 Class A-Altemative 4:Test Babette Viruses and Hemunth ova;NO New Solids ® AS (ass A-Alternative S PFRP L Composting ❑ A52 (assA-Altemative S PFRP 2:Heat Drying A53 Class AAlterative S PFRP 3:Liquid Heat Treatment A54 (ass A-Altemative S PFRP 4:Thermophdic Aambc Digestion(ATAD) A55 ( .A-Alterative S PFPRS:Beta Fay madction A56 (ass A-Altemative S PFPR6:Lemma Ray Irradiation A50 Class AAlternative S PFRP]:Pasteumaatmn A6 (ass A-Altemative 6:PFRP Equivalency ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Page 11 of 23 Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by put facility or anotberpersoNfacktyforthis sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply) Vector Attraction Reduction Options ® VRI Option l-Wfatde Solids Reduction VU Option 2-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Anaembic Bench Test) ❑ W Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aerobic Beach Test with Percent Solids ofTwo Percent or Iess) W Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake Role ® VR5 Option 5-Aerabic Processing Obennopbilic Aerobic Digestion/Composting) VR6 Option 6-alkaline Treatment W Option 7-Drywg(Fgnot to or Greater than 75 Percent) mut Option 8-Drying flu gal to or Greater than 90 Percent) Nenaom rliance Say acting Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPAa Federal sewage sludge program requirements(see 40 CFR503)for this facility during the reporting period.FPAnotes that any person who prepares sewage sludge(i.e,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a material&am sewage sludge)sha0 ensure that the applicable requirements m FPXs biosclids regulations(40 M5031 annual when the sewage sludge is applied to the land,placed on a surface disposal site,or fired in a sewage sludge incinerator(sea 40 M503.71. Land Application Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or said or gave away sewage sludge in a bag or other container when one ormore pollutant concentrations io the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceding pollutant Iim6(sea Table 1 of40 CPR503.131. Facility failed to properly collect and analyee its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequenry and approved analytical methods in order to obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding times)(see permit requirements and 40(PR5O3 8). Facility had deficiencies with pathogen redumiou(see 40�j). Facility bad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 CFR503.331. Unit application ofbulk sewage sludge hkety to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 oftbe Brdangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat(see 40 CFR503.14fa31 Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agriculural land,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation site that was flooded,bunch,or snow-covered such that the bulk sewage sludge entered a wetland orotherwatem of the United States,as defined in 40 M 1222,except as provided in a permit issued pursuant o Section 402 or 404 oflhe MA(see 40 M503.14(b)). Bilk sewage sludge was app bed to agricultural land,forest,or a reclamation site was 10 meters or less Soon waters ofthe United Rates,as defined io 40 QFR 122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(see 40 CFR503 14(cll. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact sHe,ora reclamation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate foribe bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofa reclamation site,otherwise specified by the petmitnng authority(see 40 t}R503 I-W. ❑ One or more label or in formation sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given away for land appRation(see 40[PR503.14(eu. pak sewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 003 130,H2l have been reached. ❑ The required notice and inPormation was not provided to the land application appber(see 40 CFIt503.12M and in Page 12 of 23 Mae required notice and intbrmadon was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40 CPR503.12fh11. ❑ Mae required notice was not provided to the permitting authority far the State in wb ch bulk sewage sludge was applied ifthe bulk sewage sludge was applied to land in a State other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40 CTR503126)and(i . 96e facility failed to keep the necessary records for preparers and appinm during the reposing period(see 40 CPR 503271. SSUIL)Section Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(SSM):003 Management Practice Type Handler,Preparer,or Applier Type' Management Practice Mmil* Land Application Off-Site Thhd-Party Preparer Distribution and h1arketmg-Compost Please Note:had Application,includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give away)of©ass AEQ.`UffSte Third-Patty Handler or Applier're&m to thed panes which do not change the quality oftbe Bosolids.'D& Ste Third-Pany Preparer're&rs to a third patty which changes the quality ofthe 9osolids. Bulk or Beg/Camawer* Pathogen Gass* Wlume Amouut(dry metric tons)* Balk UaasAH)(sale/giveaway) 5376 Po[Intent Concentrations: Did the facility lend apply bulk sewage sludge when one or more pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentration in nble 3 of40 CPR503.137 OYes 0 No O Unknown Name of Off-Site]bird-Party Handler,Preparer,or Applier for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information forthe Off-Ste Third-Patty Handler Preparer or Appber forthu Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier You mayopOonally lookup a NPDhS]D w auto-populate this mformatitm Iffields remain blankaRerclickmg the lookup button,then no data exists and you must enterthe information. Off-Site Third-Party Handler,Preparer or Applier Information NPD®m(if crown) PacJay/Company Name Eberly Compost Pddrea 12421 Holloway Rd. ay. &ate* zip Code fast HJls "me 93249 Off-Site Third-Party Handler Preparer,or Applier Contact Information Fast Name• last Name• 'IRle Patrick McCasby Ste Manager Phone(10digits,No dashes)' at. &MaJAddmss 6617972914 patre ecasbyrQinccasbyfanns.enm Bosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the pathogen reduction options used by your hardly for this sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply). Page 13 of 23 Code Pathogen Reduction Option Gass Almost also demonstrate that meet fecal coliform or salmonella limits) ❑ Al Oars A-Altemative l:i e/Temperatum ❑ A2 Class A-Altemative 2:pH/Tempemure/Percent Sobds ❑ A3 Class A-Altema[ive 3:Tes[Fr[enc Viruses and Hehnmth ova;Operating Pmameters ❑ A4 OasshAhsmativa,tTest Enteric Viruses and lialmmth ova;No New Solids ® MI Gass A-Altcmative S PFRP 1:Composting ❑ A52 Gass A-Ahemative S PFRP 2:Heat Drying ❑ A53 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 3:liquid Heal Treatment ❑ A54 Gass hAhcnnative S PFRP 4:ghermophitio sombre agestion(ATM) ❑ A55 Class A-Altemative S PFPRS:Beta Ray Irradiation ❑ Am Gass A-Ahem Live S PFPR6:Comma Ray Irradiation ❑ A50 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 7:Pastemonstlon ❑ A6 Gass A-Altemative 6:PFRP Equivalency ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by your facJky or another person/facility for this sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply) Vector Attraction Reduction Options ® VRI Option l-Volatile Solids Reduction ❑ VR2 Option 2-Bench-Scale VolatJe Solids Raductiov(Anaambic Beach Test) ❑ Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aerobk Beach Teat with Percent Solids mfTyo Vm Percent or less) ❑ VR4 Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake Fate ® VRS Option 5-Aerobic Processing flhermoplulic Aerob is Digestion/Composting) ❑ VR6 Option 6-Aialine Treatment ❑ VR] Option]-DhyingA mal to or Greater than lS Percent) ❑ VRS Option 8-Drying(Equalto or Greater than 90 Percent) Nonctma fiance factorial, Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPA's Federal sewage sludge program requhements face 40 CFR503)for this facility during the repotting perio 1.&A notes that any person who prepares sewage sludge be.,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a maternal from sewage sludge)shall ensure that the applicable requirements N FPNs bwsobds regulations(40 01R503)an met when he sewage sludge is applied to the land,placed on a surface disposal site,or feed lo a sewage sludge mciaerator(see 40t 5039). Page 14 of 23 land Application ❑ Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or sold or gave away sewage sludge or a bag or other container when one tumorn pollutant concentrations N the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceiling pollutant limit(see Table 1 of40(PR503.131. Facility faded to properly collect and analyse its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frdquencyand approved analytical methods vt orderto obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding tines)(see permit requirements and 40(TR501R). Facility had deficiencies with pathogen reduction(see 40�j). Facilityhad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40(PR503331. Iaud application ofb alit sewage sludge likely to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 dithe Endangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat(see dl CPRSo3_l4gU.. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation site that was flooded,frozen,or snrw.crvcwd such that the bulk sewage sludge entered a wetland or ther waters of the On tied States,as defined in 40 M 1122 except as provided in a permit issued pursuant to Section 402 or 404 ofthe( A(see 40(1R503141,1), 9rlk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,or reclamation site was 10 meters or less from waters ofthe United States,as defined N 40 QFR 122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(sec 40(T�'R503 14(r)1. bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact site,or recamation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate for the bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case on reclamation site,otherwise specified by the permiumg authority(see 40(TR503 14(d)). ❑ One or more label or in formation sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given away for land application(see 40(TR50314leA ❑ Brdcsewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 003 13(b)(2l have been reached. ❑ The required notice and information was not provided to the land application appher(see 40 CFR503.12(tl and in The required notice and information was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40(TR 503 12dH. The required active was not provided to the permitting authority for the State in which bulk sewage sludge was applied tithe bulk sewage sludge was applied to hand in a Slate other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40=50312(i)and fil). The Steady faded to keep the necessary records for preparers and apphers during the reporting period(see 4o<t�27). SSUIDSection Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(SSUfty:004 Management Practice type* Handler,Preparer,or Applier Type* Management Practice Detail* Land Apo lication Off Site Third-Party Preparer Distribution and Marketing-Compost Please Note-lend Application includes the diet button and marketing(sale or give away)ofGass AEQ.`OffSile Third-Party Handler or Also ier'refers to third parties which do not change the quality ofthe Wichita 'Off- Site Thad-Party Prepaper'refers to a than party which changes the quality ofthe Bo udide. bilk or lkrp ontainer* Pathogen Osss* Wlume Amount(drymetric tons)' Bulk Gass AEQ(saha/giveaway) 475 Pollutant Cancentrations: Did the hardly land apply bulk sewage sludge when one or more pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentration in Table 3 of40(FR503.139 O Yes Q No O Unknown Name ofrff-Site Third-Party Handler,Preparer,or Applier for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information bribe Off-Site Third-Party Handler,Preparer,or Appler forthis Sewage Sludge Unique Identif oYou may optionally look up a NPDES]Dto auto-populate this mfermatlon.Iffields remain blartkaRerebelding the bacteria button,them no data exists and you must enterthe information. Off-Site Third-Party Handler,Preparer,or Applier Information Page 15 of 23 NPD®D(ifkvowv) Facility/Company Name" Syaagm—Araona Sods Md.. 5615&91st Avenue Uy" &ate• Zip Code" Tolkson Arizona 55353 Off-Site Third-Party Handler,Prepareq or Applier Contact Information Out Name Lest Name' Title' Craig Ccyer Senor Opemtiona Manager Phone(10-digits,No dashes)' Ed. &Mad Address 6239366328 COeyer@a WAGltO.com Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the pathogen reduction options used by your facility for this sewage sludge unique identifier for me reporting period(check one or more that apply). Cade Pathogen Reduction Option Class A(must also demonstrate that meet fecal coliform or salmonella limits) Al /ass A-Altemative l:Time/Temperature A2 Crass A-Altemative2:pH/Temperature/Percent Sobds A3 OaasAAltemative3:Test Fteric Ynuses and Hahnmth ova;Operating Parameters A4 Class A-Altemative 4:Test Babette Viruses and Hemunth ova;NO New Solids ® AS Gass A-Alternative S PFNP L Composting ❑ A52 Q ssA-Altemative S PFRP 2:Heat Drying A53 Class AAltemative S PFRP 3:Bquid Heat Treatment A54 /ass A-Alternative S PFRP 4:Thermophdic Aembc Digestion(ATAD) A55 Crass A-Alternative S PFPRS:Beta Fay madction A56 Oaas A-Altemative S PFPR6:Crtmma Ray Irradiation A50 Class A-Alternative S PFRP]:Pasteurimtion A6 Oass A-Altemative 6:PFRP Fyuivalenry ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Page 16 of 23 Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by put facility or anotberpersoNfacktyforthis sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply) Vector Attraction Reduction Options ® VRI Option l-Wfatde Solids Reduction VU Option 2-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Anaembic Bench Test) ❑ W Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aerobic Beach Test with Percent Solids ofTwo Percent or Iess) W Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake Role ® VR5 Option 5-Aerabic Processing Obennopbilic Aerobic Digestion/Composting) VR6 Option 6-alkaline Treatment W Option 7-Drywg(Fgnot to or Greater than 75 Percent) mut Option 8-Drying flu gal to or Greater than 90 Percent) Nenaom rliance Say acting Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPAa Federal sewage sludge program requirements(see 40 CFR503)for this facility during the reporting period.FPAnotes that any person who prepares sewage sludge(i.e,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a material&am sewage sludge)sha0 ensure that the applicable requirements m FPXs biosclids regulations(40 M5031 annual when the sewage sludge is applied to the land,placed on a surface disposal site,or fired in a sewage sludge incinerator(sea 40 M503.71. Land Application Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or said or gave away sewage sludge in a bag or other container when one ormore pollutant concentrations io the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceding pollutant Iim6(sea Table 1 of40 CPR503.131. Facility failed to properly collect and analyee its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequenry and approved analytical methods in order to obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding times)(see permit requirements and 40(PR5O3 8). Facility had deficiencies with pathogen redumiou(see 40�j). Facility bad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 CFR503.331. Unit application ofbulk sewage sludge hkety to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 oftbe Brdangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat(see 40 CFR503.14fa31 Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agriculural land,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation site that was flooded,bunch,or snow-covered such that the bulk sewage sludge entered a wetland orotherwatem of the United States,as defined in 40 M 1222,except as provided in a permit issued pursuant o Section 402 or 404 oflhe MA(see 40 M503.14(b)). Bilk sewage sludge was app bed to agricultural land,forest,or a reclamation site was 10 meters or less Soon waters ofthe United Rates,as defined io 40 QFR 122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(see 40 CFR503 14(cll. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact sHe,ora reclamation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate foribe bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofa reclamation site,otherwise specified by the petmitnng authority(see 40 t}R503 I-W. ❑ One or more label or in formation sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given away for land appRation(see 40[PR503.14(eu. pak sewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 003 130,H2l have been reached. ❑ The required notice and inPormation was not provided to the land application appber(see 40 CFIt503.12M and in Page 17 of 23 ❑ The required notice and information was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40 CPR503.12fh11. ❑ The required notice was not provided to the permitting authority for the State in wb ch bulk sewage sludge was applied ifthe bulk sewage sludge was applied to land in a State other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40 CFR503126)and(i . The facility failed to keep the uemasary records for preparers and appliam during the mporing period(see 40 CPR 5032]l. ® Please select this checkbox to continue completing the form. If you wish to change the SSUID section(s)ab ove,uncheck this box. 13osolids Momitrnng Data NSTRUCDONS:'These mon itming data should be representative oftbe sewage sludge that was applied to land or placed on a surface disposal site during the reporting year see 40 CFR503 Rod.This section uses the ffequency ofmoo itorina requirements in 40 Cut 503 16 and 503 76 The following codes can be used as data qualifiers:T=Too Numerous to Count,E=Estimated,N=No Data. land Application Monthly Sample Table Sample Sample Period Start Date Sample Period ad Date Sample 1 Tore Period 01-01-2019 01-31-2019 Sample 2 Tore Period 02-01-2019 02-28-2017 Sample 3 Tree Period 03-01-2017 03-31-2017 Sample 4 Tore Period N-(M-2019 04-30-2017 Sample 5 Thme Period 05-01-2017 05-31-2019 Sample 69ime Period 06-01-2017 06-30-2017 Sample 7Time Period 094)1-2019 09-31-2017 Sample 8rude Period 08-0I-2017 08-31-2017 Sample 9 rare Period 09-01-2017 09-30-2017 Sample 10 rare Period IMI-2017 10-31-2019 Sample II rare Period I1-01-2017 11-30-2019 Sample 12 Tree Period 12-01-2017 12-31 2019 Page 18 of 23 Maximum Pollutant Concentration Data for All Sewage Sludge Applied to land' lh is section summarizes the maximum pollutant concentrations in sewage sludge that was applied to land during the reporting year.lu accordance wdh 40 CFR503.13(a}FPA's sewage sludge regulationsprohlbit land application ofbulk sewage sludge or sewage sludge sold or gave away sewage sludge in a bag or othercontamer when one or more sewage sludge pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceed a land application ceiling pollutant Ilmh(see Table I nf40 DFR503 131.N order to identify noncompliance,FPAwillcompare the pollutant con centmtions m this section against the ceihug concentration Ihnits lu Table 1 of40 M5O3.13. Eiosolids or Sewage Sludge Monimred Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofMeasure(Dr,Weight) Samp le Type Arsenic Maximum mg/kg cDMPOS Sample) Simple Sample Simple Sample5 Sample6 10 16 75 7.5 9.1 8.8 Sample 7 Simple 8 Sample 9 Sample 10 Sample 11 Semple 12 7.4 1 8.0 1 7.5 93 1 9.5 11 Heralds or Sewage Sludge Adom ored Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofMeasure(Dry Weight) Sample Type Cadmium hhximum mg/kg MD S Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 Sample 6 42 6.0 4.6 3.7 4.5 1 3.3 Sample7 Sample8 Sample9 Sample 10 Sample 11 Sample 12 52 3.7 4A 33 3.3 1 3.3 Eiosohds or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Ivleaaumment Type Wit ofbfeaaure(Dry Weight) Sample Type Cupper mg/kg MO S Sample) Simple Simple3 Semi Samples Sanni6 440 I= 1 490 1= 1 470 1= 410 = 440 = 450 Simple7 Samp48 Sample Sample 10 Sample I Sample 12 430 1= 1 450 1= 460 1= 1 420 = 460 = 390 fliosolids or Sewage Sludge Abvitored Parameter Measurement Type Wit ofMeasure(AyWeight) Sample Type lead mg/kg csa P s Sample) Simple Sample Sani Samples Sample IS 10 = 14 = 13 = 11 = 11 = 12 Semple Sample Simple Sample 10 Sample ll Sample 12 12 Il 13 = 11 E 10 = 12 Page 19 of 23 Hosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Pammeter Meaaarmment Type tail ofMeaaure(Dry Weight) Sample Type Mercury mg/kg WMPOS SampleI Sample2 Sample3 Sample4 Sample Sample6 1.1 13 OJ3 1= 2.0 12 1= 0.69 Samples 8ample8 S Pla9 Sample 10 Sample ll Sample 12 1.1 092 LO = t3 0.86 = 024 Hosolids or Sewage Sludge Manhored Parameter Measurement Type 13ah ofMeamm(Dry Weight) Sample Type Wybdenum Maxmum mg/kg COWOS Sample) &anple2 &anple3 Sample4 Sample Sample6 14 18 16 = 15 = 15 = 15 Sample] S nple8 Sample9 Sample 10 Sample I Sample 12 15 = 15 = 15 = 14 = 16 = 15 gosoWs or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Uait ofMasure(DU Weight) Sample Type Mckel Maximum mg/kg M6 s Sample) &auple2 Smnple3 Sample4 Sampk5 Sumpk6 28 41 40 31 25 32 samples Smmple8 Sample9 Sample 10 Sample 11 Sample 12 34 1 1 35 1 1 32 31 1 1 32 29 6oso0ds or Sewage Sludge Wnkored Parameter Measurement Type Dart ofMeamr,(Dry Weight) Sample Type Sekniuto Maximum mg/kg WMPOS SmnpleI &mnple2 &ample3 Sample4 Samples Sample 4.9 &1 1 12 5.9 12 8.0 Sample] Sample 8 Sample 9 sample 10 &aapk 11 Sample 12 65 5.9 1 ZB 1 6.8 1 9.6 1 6 1 5.3 9osolids or Sewage Sudge Monrtomd Parameter Measurement Type Ilnk ofMaasure(Dry Weight) Sample Type 2me mg/kg WMPOS Sampkl Sample2 Sampla3 Sample4 Sample5 Sample6 670 = 930 = 680 = 580 = 630 = 600 Smnpk 9 Smvpk 8 &ample 9 Sample 10 sample 11 Semple 12 650 = 670 = 690 = 630 = 720 = 540 Page 20 of 23 Elosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Pmrameter Measurement Type WLL ofMeasnre(Dr,Weight) Sample Type Total Namgen jWplus Nitrate-Nitrite) Average mg/kg UDMPUS Sample Sample2 Sample3 Sample4 Ssmple5 Sample 57000 560M 5MM 1= 14WOO 56000 1= 1 57000 Sample Sample8 SamPla9 Sample 10 Sample ll Sample 12 49000 460M 54000 1= 1 50000 52000 1= 1 57000 Monthly Average Pollutant Concentration Data for At Sewage Sludge Applied to land' Thu seehon summar¢es the monitoring-period average pollutant concentrations in sewage sludge that was applied to land during the reporting year. 9osolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofA amre(Dry Weight) Sample Type Arsenio Average mg/kg ODMPUS Sample) Sample2 Strangle Sample4 Sample Sample 9.7 12 1 E 11 6.9 8.3 1= 72 Sample 7 Sample 8 Sample 9 Sample 10 Sample 11 Sample 12 7.2 g.0 72 1 72 8.4 1= 1 8.9 9osolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofMaaure(Da Weight) Sample Type Cadmium Avemge mg/kg mMPOS Sample) Sample2 Sample3 Sample4 Sample Sumple6 4.0 1= 55 I= 45 1= 3.6 = 42 1= 3.3 Samp47 Samp48 S.Pla9 Sample 10 Sample I Sample 12 4.4 1= 1 8.0 1= 3.9 1= 2.9 = 3.0 1= 3.0 Eiosolids or Sewage Sludge Margored Parameter Measurement Type Wit ofMeamne(Dry Weight) Sample Type Capper Avemge mg/kg ODMPOS Sample) Sample2 Sample3 Sample4 Sample5 SamPle6 420 *ul 450 1= 410 = 410 = 430 Sample7 Sample8 Sample9 Sample 10 Sample I Sample 12 430 450 450 I= 4M = 1 400 = 1 390 9osohds or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Me.anrement Type Wit ofMeasure(Dy Weight) Sample Type Lead Avemge mg/kg UDMPOS Sample) Sample2 Sample3 Sample Sample5 Sample6 E 92 1 13 = 13 E 11 E 9h E 11 Sample 7 Sample 8 Sample 9 Sample 10 Sample 11 Sample 12 E 10 E 11 E 11 = 11 E 9.7 = 12 Page 21 of 23 Hosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Uah ofMeasure(I)ry Weight) Sample Type Mercury Average mg/kg mhM s SampleI Suvple2 S.Ple3 Sn ple4 Sample Sample6 0.99 12 0.69 = 1.4 12 = 0.66 S.ple9 Sample8 SamPle9 Sample 10 Sample ll Sample 12 0.92 0.78 0.99 = LI 1 0]5 1= 0.74 Wsolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type lAtit ofMcasure(Dry Weight) Sample Type M kel Average mg/kg COMPOS Sample) Sample2 Saraple3 Sample4 Samples Sample 28 1= 35 1= 39 1= 30 1= 25 1= 32 Sample] Smnple8 Smnple9 Sample 10 Sample I Sample 12 34 34 32 1= 28 1= 30 1= 28 Hosolls or Sewage Sludge Mrnitored Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofMeamre(Dry Weight) Sample Type Selenium Average mg/kg MO S Sample) Smnple2 Smnple3 Sample4 Sampk5 Sample 4.7 1 E 5.6 1 E ].d 5.9 11 7.0 Sample] Smnple 8 SmnPle 9 Sample 10 Sample 11 Sampla 12 62 1 5.9 1 7.6 6.0 7.8 1 F 3.0 Mosolids or Sewage Sludge Manitored Parameter Measurement Type hart ofMeamr,(Dry Weight) Sample Type Tine Average mg/kg WD S Sample) smnple2 Steeple Sample4 Samples Sample 640 650 1 680 1 580 590 1 600 Sample] Sample 8 sample 9 sample 10 sample 11 Sample 12 650 670 680 610 640 520 Pathogens:©ass A,Fecal Coliform* Hosolds or Sewage Sludge Minitored Parameter Measurement Type lArit ofMeasare(Ay Weight) Sample Type Fecal()akfa. Maximum I gram OOMPOS Sample) Sample2 Saraple3 Sample4 Samples Sample6 N Sample] Sample 8 Sarnple 9 Sample 10 Sample 11 Sample 12 N Pathogens:Class A Salmonella Page 22 of 23 Hosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Meaenrement Type Unit ofWasure fay Weight) Sample Type Salmonella WNper4gmms OOMPOS %mplel Sample Sample Samplc4 Simple Sample N Sample Sample Sample Sample 10 Sample 11 Sample 12 Vector Attraction Reduction-Volatile Solids Options(Options 1-3)" Mosolids or Sewage Sludge hbndored Parameter Measurement Type than ofMcamm(Dry Weight) Samp le Type Solds,totalvolatdepereentremovel Mmimam Percent Sample Sanple2 Sample3 Sample Sample Sample 57 1 52 60 61 56 55 Sample] Sample 8 Sample 9 Sample 10 Sample 11 SumpW 12 51 60 46 60 1 59 1 60 Additional lrformation Please enterany additional in6nvation W the comment boxbebw(Whit to 3,900 characters)that you would like to provide. [7albi.,.IW,compliance report. Additional Attachments(maawum size 25 MB) File:2017_OCSD_Annual_Hosolids_Compliance_Peport_503.pdf Certlficatom infomration Icertify,underpenalty oflaw,that the information in this report was prepared undermy direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gatherand evaluate this information.Ism aware that there are significant penalties fords¢certification including the possibiltyoffine and hnpriamment. Cartifierl MWi1" Form action" ose(afcsd.co Appro Page 23 of 23 plat Sewage Sludge (Biosolids)Ann03.48port FPARegulations-503.18,503.28,503.48 INSTRUCTIONS FPA's sewage sludge regulations f40(PRoan 5031 require certain POI Ws and Gass Isewage sludge management facilities to submit to an annual biosolids report.POWs that must submit an annual report include POIWs with a design flow rate equal to or greater than one million gallons per day,and POIWs that serve 10,000 people or mom.lhis is the biosolids annual report form for POlWs and(lass Isewage sludge management facilities in the 42 states and strikes and rermorks where bPAadmiantem the Fedemlbiosolids program. For the purposes ofthls form,the term'sewaee sludge also rekm to the material that is commonly refined to as biosolids.'FPAdoes not have a regulatory definition for biosolids but this material is commonly referred to as wage sludge that is placed on,or applied to the land to use the beneficial properties ofthe material as a sod amendment,conditkneq or fertilGer.PPA3 use ofthe term biosolids'in this form is to confirm that information about beneficod[yused sewage sludge(aka.biosofids)shoukd be reported on this form. Please note that questions with a(4)are required.Please also note that ERAmay contact you after you submit this report for more information regarding your sewage sludge program. Questions regarding this form should be directed to the NPDR3 Electronic Reporting Iklpdeskac •NPDBSeRepoftwgQpa.gov OR •1-877-2274965 What action would you hike to take?' New 9osolids Pmgmm Report I.Program Information Please select the NPDPS m number below for this Sewage Sludge(9osolids)Annual Report' C 120604:Orange County SD 42 INJPORTANT-Fyou do not see the NPDFS 1D associated with your facility(i.e.,you only see a blue bar in the above drop down fist,you MUSTfoBow the instructions in the'Hosolids User's GuidePAshorter set of instructions to fix this issue are in the'Important Instructions on Accessing YourNPDFS m"docoment.Both documents are located at:bttosl/eoanet mndeskcom/hc/en-us/uctkns/207 108787-General-Nosohis. Facility Name:Orange County SD#2 Street: 10844 Ellis Avenue City:FOUNTAIN VAI I FV State:CA Zip Code:92708-7018 1.1 Please selectat kartone ofthe following optionsperlaming to yourobhgation to submit a Sewage Sludge(Biosohds)Annual Report in compliance with 40S 593.lhe facilityis:' Za P0T9with a design flow rate equal to or greater than one million gallons per day ZaPOTVthat serves 10,000 people or more Z a Class I Mudge Management Facihtyas defined to 40 CElt5039 otherwise required to report(e.g.,permit condilion,enfbrament action) none ofthe above Page 1 of 26 1.2 Reporting Period Start and ad Dates Start Date ofReporting Period• ad Date of Reporting Period• 01-01-2017 12-31-2017 2.Facilitymfr mation 2.19osofids or Sewage Sludge Treatment Processes Please check the box net to the following biosofids or sewage sludge treatment processes that you used on the sewage sludge or bioaoPda generated or produced at your facility during the reporting period(check one or more that apply).* Pathogen Reduction Operations(see App andix Bto Part 503) Physical Treatment Operations Processes to Significantly Reduce Pathogens(PSRPI ® Preliminary Operations(e.g.,sludge grind'mg,degritting,blend'mg) Aembie Digestion ® 'llaickxning(e.g,gravity and/or flotation thickening,centrifugation,belt fikerpress,vacuum filter) Air Lkymg(or`sludge drying beds') ❑ Sludge Lagoon ® Anaerobic Oigestion Other Processes to Manage Sewage Sludge ❑ Lower Temperature Composting ❑ Temporary Sludge Storage(sewage sludge stored on land 2 years or less,not m sewage sludge unit) ❑ Lime Stab Rication ❑ Lang-term Sludge Storage(sewage sludge stored on land 2 years or more,not in sewage sludge unit) Processes to Further Reduce Patbonena(PPRP) ® Methane orRagas Capture and Recovery Lfigher Temperature Composting ❑ Other Treatment Process: Lbat Drying(e.g,flash dryer,sproydryegromry dryer) LLeat Treatment(Liquid sewage sludge is heated to temp.of356T(or I80`Qorhgher for 30 min.) Thermophik,Aerobic Digestion ❑ Bata Ray Irradiation ❑ Gamma Rayhradiation ❑ Pasteurization 2.2 Ek sofids or Sewage Sludge Analytical Methods EPA mgulatons specify that representative samples ofsewage sludge that is applied to the land,placed on a suffice disposal site,or fired in a sewage sludge incinerator must be collected and analyzed,these regulations also specify the analytical methods that must be used to analyze samples ofsewage sludge.For example,EPArequhes facilities to monitor for the certain parameters,which are listed in Tables 1,2,3,and d at 40 CPR503.13 and nbles 1 and 240 QT1503 23.See also 40 CFR503.8. Please check the box net to the following analytic methods used on the sewage sludge or bioaolids generated or produced byyou or put facility during the reporting period(check one or more that apply) Parameter Method Number or Author Descrip tion Text for Certification Section Pathogens Sludge Monitoring-Ascaris ova. Sludge Monitoring-Awaris ova,'Test Method for Detecting,Enumerating,and Determwmg the Ybflky Awards in Sludge Astoria ova. (AppendxL),"Control of Pathogens and sector Attraction in Sewage Sludge",lq`"25-R-92-013,July 2003 Other Awaris ova.Analytical Method: Page 2 of 26 Parameter Method Number or Author Descrip tion Text for C rtiHcation Section ASTM Method D4994-Enteric Causes ASIMMethod D4994-Boncrdo Yvuses,"Standard Practice for Recovery afl5ruses From Wastewater Sludges,"ASTM International Enteric comes Othar Enteric Causes Analylical Mathod: � Standard Method 9222-Fecal Cohform Standard Method 9222-Fecal Califonq'5tandard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater;'American Public Health Association[Note:This method is only allowable Inc Class Bsewage sludge] Standard Method 9221-Fecal Conform Standard Method 9221-Fecal Colifonn,'5tandard Methods bar the Examination of Water and Wastewater,"American Public Health Association Fecalcobfcar F1EPAMelbod 1680-Fecal Colform EPAMethod 1680-Fecal Coform,'Pecal Coldness in Sewage Sludge by[vuniple-Tube Fermentation using lauryl Tryptose Foods � EPAMethod 1681-Fecal Coliforn suit EC3Aadimn,"EPA.821-IF10-003,April 2010 EPAMethod 1681-Fecal Colfmm,Fecal Colfonms in Sewage Sludge(E4osolds)bybhhipdeTabe Fermentation using hl Other Fecal Coliforrm Analytical Method: medium,ITM21-Ib04-027,1une 2005 WA Yanko Method-Hehmmth ova. WA Yanko Method-Helmmth Ova,'Dccurrence of Pathogens in Distribution and Marketing MardeipalSludges," Helmmth ova. EPA-6W-1-87-014,1987 Other Helminth ova.Analytical Method: Standard Method 9260-Salmonella Standard Method 9260-Salmonella,'Sandard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastawatev"American Public Health Association � EPAMmhmI 1692-Saaunra EPAMethod 1682,"Salmonella in Sewage Sludge(Rowboat by Modeled Semisolid Rappaport-Cassiliadis(MSRV)Medium," Sahnouella sP �cterla EPA,821-E-06-014,July 2006 ❑ Renner and Clark Metbod-SSMonella Fenner and Clark Method-Sslmonella,`DateCNon and Enumeration ofSahmonalls and Psaudommus aamginosa:1.Water ❑ Other Salmonella sp.Fortran Analytical Method: Pollution Control Federation,46(9C 163-2171,1974 Class ASludge Monitoring-Total Onlmrable Moses EPA Class A Sludge Monitoring-TotalCplumb le Mmaes,"Method bar the Recovery and Assay oflotal Cultumble Causes from Total Crlturable Causes Sludge(Appendix H),"Control ofPathogens and M:etor Attraction in Sewage Sludge,ll`"25-Ib92-013,Judy 2003 Other Total Crhurable Viruses Analytical Method: Metals ® EPAMetlod 6010-Arsenic QCPAFS) EPA Method 6010-Arsenic(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/Ommical Methods,"EPAPob.SW-846 � EPAMethod 6020- irmorie(ICP-MS) EPA Method 6020-Arsenic inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ Chemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 Arsenic � EPAMethod T010-Arsenic(GF-AAS) EPA Method 9010-Among;(Cmaphits Mmace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry),'Test Methods for EAaluating Solid Waste, EPAMethod 9061-2insame(AA-Cell) Physical/Clumical Methods('EPA Pub.SW-846 EPA Method'l061-Arsenic(Atomic Absorption-Gaseous Hydride),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/Qemical Other Arsenic Asaytical Method: Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ® EPAMmhmI 6010-Bery11ium 0CP-OES) EPA Method 6010-Berylhum(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physieal/Co mical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 F] EPAMethpd 6020-Berythum(ICP-MS) EPA Method 6020-Beryllium driductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spactmmatry),'Teat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physlcal/Uemical Methods;'EPA Pub.5 W-846 BeryPium � IPAMethod T000-Beryllium(FAAS) EPA Method 9000-BerylliumMaine komic Abarntion Spectrophotometryk'Test Methods for Evaluating S4id Waste,Physical/ EPAMethod 7010-Beryllium Chemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 (Qr-Aqq) EPA Method 7010-Beryllium(Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectmpbotometry),'Test Methods Poi Evaluating Solid Other Wryllurm Analytical Method Waste,PhysicaVUemical Methods,"EPAsub.SW-846 Page 3 of 26 Parameter Method Number or Author Ecscrip Non Text for Csrti6catum Section ® IPAMetbod 6010-Cadmium(1CP-0W EPA Method 6010-Cadmvrm(Inducthely Coupled Plasma-OpCsal Emission Spectrometry),"hst Methods forE duatlug Solid Waste,Physical/Oremical Methods,"EPAPob.SW-846 ❑ EPAMethod 6020-Cadmium 0e-MS) EPAMethod 6020-Cadmlum(rnductively(buph:d Plasma-Mess Spectrometry),'Ted Methods for Evalumlug Solid Waste, EPAMethod 7000-Cadmium(FAAS) PhysieaVChcmiwl Methods,"IPAPub.W-846 Cadmium ❑ IPAMethod]000-Cadmlum(Wame Atomic Absorption$pectrophotometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaV EPAMethod 7010-Cedmium(OF-AAS) Otemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW4146 EPAMethod 7010-Cadmium(Graphite Fumace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry),^test Methods for Evaluating Sobd ❑ FPAMethod 7131-Cadmium(GF-AAS) Waste,Physiea/aemieal Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ❑ Other Cadmium Analytical Method: IPAMcthod 7131-Cadmium(Graphee Fumace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaVCbemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 EPAMethod 6010-(]rrommm f"-OES) EPAMethod 6010-Ummium(Induetively Coopled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/Chemical Methods,"FPAPub.SW-846 ❑ FPAMethod6020-armum(ICP-MS) IPA Method 6020-Qmmium deductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Test Metbods for Evaluating Solid Waste, PhysicaVQemical Methods,"IPA Pub.SW-846 ❑ FPAMethod]000-(Lromvm(FAA$) IPA Method]000-ammium(Flame Atoms Absorption Spectrophotometryh"list Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Otromium ❑ IPAMethod]010-Chmmmm(ff-AAS) PhyaicaVOremsal Methods,"FPAPub.SW-846 MA Method 7010-Oiromium(Graphite pomace Atom's Absorption Spectrophotomelry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid ❑ IPAMethod 7191-Chmmium Waste,PhysicaVlTemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 (A F1) IPAMethod]191-Ommium(Atomic absorption-FurnacePechnique),'Teat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ Olherllromwn Analytical Method: Otemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW4146 ® FPAMetbod 6010-Capper(1CP-OES) IPAMethod 6010-Copper(hrducliveb Coupled Plasma-Opticallanission 5pectromens),7esl Methods for Evaluating Solid Weste,PhysicaVaemical Methods,"FPAPub.SW-846 EPAMethod 6020-Copper(ICP-MS) IPAMethod 6020-Capper(Inductiveb Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Teat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ Oremical Methods,"EPAPub.SW4i46 Capper ❑ FPAMeNod 7000-Copper(FAA$) IPA Method 7000-Capper(FemeArcane Absorption Spectrophotometry),'Teat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ EPAMethod]010-Copper(GF- Ommical Methods,"EPAPub.SW346 AAS) EPAMethod]010-Capper d5raphne Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectropbotometryb'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, ❑ Other Capper Analytical Method: Physical/a,ra al Methods;'IPAPub.SW--846 ® IPAMethod 6010-lead(IP-OES) IPA Method 6010-Icad(luduetiecly Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),^feat Methods for Evaluating%Lid Waste, PhysicaVChcmical Methods,"IPA Pub.SW-846 ❑ IPAMethod 6020-lend 0CP-MS) EPAMrthod 6020-land(luductively Coupled Plasma-WasSpectrometryZ'Tesl Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaV EPAMsdmd]000-Iead(FAAS) Qcndeal Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 lead ❑ MA Method 7000-Iead(Home Atomic Absorption SpectrophotomertI'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ IPAMetbod 9010-land(C£-AAS) Chemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 IPA Method 7010-lead((haphde Pomace Atomic Absorption Spectropbotometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Sohd Waste, ❑ FPAMethod 7421-Iead(AA-F1) PhyslcaVUemiral Metbods,"IPA Pub.W-846 MA Method]421-lead(Atomic Absorption-Fumace Techniquet'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,MmicaVUemical ❑ OIM1erlead Analytical lvS lhod: Methods,'EPAPub.SW446 ® EPA Method 7471-Memory(CVAA) IPA Method 7471-Mercury in Solid or Semi-Solid Waste(Culd Vapor Atomic Ansoprtion),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Mercury. Waste,PhysicaVOremical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 ❑ OIM1er MercuryAnalNical Method: Page 4 of 26 Parameter Method Number or Author Description Text for Certification Section ® EPAMetbod 6010-Molybdenum(IB-06) EPA Method 6010-Molybdenum(fnductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Enousfn Spectrometry),'Test Methods bar Evaluatng Solid Waste,Physicallaemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-W EPAMethod 6020-Moybdenum(12P-MS) EPAMethod 6020-Molybdenum(Inductively Qupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, ❑ EPAMetbod]000-Molybdenum(FAAS) PhysiaVQemical Methods"EPAPub.SW--846 EPAMethad 7000-Molybdenum(Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometryx'Test Methods fr Ecalusting Solid Waste, Molybdenum ❑ ppAMethod]010-Molybdenum(GF-AAS) PhysicaV4temical Methods"FPAPub.SW-846 EPAMethod 7010-Molybdenum(Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid ❑ EPAMethod 7481-Molybdenum Waste,PhysicaVQemical Methods,"FPAPub.SW-846 (M-FT) FPAMelhod]481-Molybdenum(Atomic Absorption-Fumace Technique),"Isso Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ Other Molybdenum Analytical Method: acindal Matlmds,"EPAPub.SW-846 ® EPAMethod 6010-Nlclmld(GP-OES) EPAMethod 6010-Nickel(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),'Test Methods far Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaVQem ical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 EPAMethod 6020-Nickel(ICP-MS) EPAMethod 6020-Nickel(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Test Metbods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysicaV Nickel EPAMethod -Nlcke hod 7000l(FAAS) aturial Methods,"EPAPub.SW4146 ❑ EPAMethod 7000-Nickel(Flame Atom's Absorption Spectrophotometry),'Test Methods fin Evaluating Solid Waste,Physica/ ❑ EPAMethod 7010-Nckd(GF- Qemial Methods,"ETAPub.SW446 AAS) EPAMethod 7010-Nickel(Omphite Pomace Atomic Absorption Spectropbotometry),'Test Methods for E4aluating Solid Waste, ❑ Other Nickel Analytical Method: MysicaVQemical Methods"EPAPub.SW--846 ® EPAMetbod 6010-Selenium QIG 0135) EPAMethod 6010-Selenium(Inductively Quphrd Plasma-Optical 5nission Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysiaVQemical Methods;'FPAPob.SW-846 ❑ EPAMethod 6020-Selenium 9CP-MS) EPA Method 6020-Selerandflductively Qupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry),'Test Methods bar Embattling Solid Waste, PhysicaVQemical Methods;'EPA Pub.SW-846 ❑ EPAMethod]010-Belevium(GF-AAS) EPA Method 7010-Selenium(GrapMte Furnace Atomic Absorption SpaidmphmometryZ Teat Methods for Evaluating Solid Selenium ❑ EPAMethod]]40-Rdenhm(A Ff) Waste,Physicallasmical Methods;'EPAPob.SW-846 EPA Method]]4IA-Selemum(Atomic Absorption-Furnace Techniquex'Test Methods bar Ebaluathrg Solid Waste,PhysicaV ❑ FPAMethod]]41-Rdeulum Qemicul Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 (AMGfq EPA Method]]41-Selenium(Atomic Absorption-Gaseous Hydride),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhysleaVQemical ❑ Other Selenium Analytical Method: Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 ® EPAMethod 6010-ZmC(1B4]ES) EPAMethod 6010-Z.mc daductively Qupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, PhysiaVQemial Methods"EPAPub.SR-846 ❑ EPAMetbod 6020-Zvic(KP MS) EPAMethod 6020-Zise(InductivelyCoupled Plasma-Mass Spsctrometq), est Methods frEvaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ Qemical Methods,"FPAPub.SW446 live ❑ FPAMethod]000-Zfe(FAAS) EPA Method]000-Zinc(Flame Atomic Absorption SpeclmphotometryZ7bat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/ ❑ EPAMetbod]010-Zinc(U-AA8) Qemical Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 EPAMothod 7010-Smc(Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption SpectrophotometryZ"fast Methods for Braluating Solid Waste, ❑ Other2 rAnalytical Method: PhysicaVQemical Methods,"EPA Pub.SW--846 Nitrogen Qmpounds ❑ EPAMethod 350.1-Ammonia Nitrogen EPAMethod 350.1-Ammonia Ntrogen,"Determmatfn ofe rnonia Nitrogen by Semidurtomated Qbrimetry,"Angust 1993 Ammonu Nitrogen ® Standard Method 4500-NH3-Adromm Nitrogen Standard Method 4500-NIE3-Yamamoto Nitrogen,Ikandard Methods fin the Examination of Water and Wastewater"American Public Heakh Association ❑ Other Ammonia Nitrogen Analytical Method Page 5 of 26 Parameter Method Number or Author Descrip tion Text for 4rti6catiov Section � IPAMethod 9056-Nitrate Nitrogen(IC) FPAMethod 9056-Nitrate Nitrogen(bn Ormmatogmphy),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical,asmical Methods,"EPAPub.SW446 � FPAMetb.d 9210-Nitrate Nltmgen OSE) FPAMethod 9210-Nitrate Nitrogen Orn-Selective Hectrode),Test Methods for Festooning Solid Waste,PhyncaVQremical Methods,"EPAPub.SWb46 ® OIM1er Nitate Nitrogen Analytical Method: PA 300.0 Nitrate Nitrogen ® Standard Method 4500-N-Nitrogev Standard F Method 4500-N-Nitrogen,"Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater;'Americ an Public Health Nitrogen Association (titer Nitrogen Malytical Method- Standard Method 4500-Norg-Organic Nitrogen Standard Method 4500-Norg-Organic Nitrogen,Ikandard Metbods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,"Amencan Public Health Association ® OIM1er Organic Nitrogen Analytical Method: Calculmlon Organic Nitrogen ® EPAMeWod 351.2-Total lfjehlahl Nitrogen IPA Method 3512-Total Igc1dahl Nitrogen,'Deoundri tion ofTotal lfjeldAl Nitrogen by Semi-Automated Colorimetry;'August Total l(leldahl Nitrogen 1993 Other TotallGeWahl Nitrogen Analytical Method: Other Analytes Standard Method 2540-Fixed Solids Standard Method 2540-Total,fixed,and volatile solids,"Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater;' Fired Solids American Publs Health Association Other Fixed Solids Analytical Method: ® EPAMetbod 9095-Paint Fiber liquids Test IPA Method 9095-Fund Fiber Equals Test,7cat Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,PhyssaVacmical Methods;'EPAPub. Pant Filter Test SW-946 Other Pent Filter Test Analytical Method: � EPAMethod 9040-pHFs 7%solids) EPA Method 9040-PHF,7%solicish'Test Methods for Evaluating Soled Waste,PhyscaVOremical Methods,"EPAPub.SW-846 PH ® IPAMetbod 9045-PH(>7%soUs) IPAMethod 9045-pH(>7%sohds),'Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,Physkavaemical Methods:'IPA Pub.SW-846 Otber pH Malytical Method: Standard Method 2710-SOUR Standard Method 2710-Speci&Oxygen Uptake Fine,"Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater;' Specific Oxygen Uptake American Public Health Association Rate Other Specific Oxygen Uptake Fate Analybeal Method: ® IPAMethod 13 11-Toxicity Q,erectereic leaching IPA Method 1311-Toxicity Qtmaderistic leaching Procedure,'Test Methods for E Iuatng Sofid Waste,PhydraVQtemical TQP Procedure Methods,'EPAPub.5W446 Otbet'ICTPAnalytical Method: Page 6 of 26 Parameter Method Number or Author I scription Text for Certification Section ❑ Standard Method 2550-Temperature Standard Method 2550-Temperature,Standard Methods for the Permutation of Water and Wastewater,"American Public Health Temperature Association ❑ Other TemperatureAnalytical Method: ® Standard Method 2540-Total Solids Standard Method 2540-Total,fixed,and volatile solids,Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater;' Total9oLds American Public Health Association ❑ Other Total Solids Analytical Method: ® Standard Method 2540-Melanie Solids Standard Method 2540-Total,fixed,and volatile solids,'Standard Methods 6r the Examination of Water and Wastewater," Volatile Solids Amcrican Public Health Jassociation ❑ Other Wlame Solids Analytical Method: No Analytical Methods ❑ No Analytical Methods Used 23 What is the estimated total volume ofbiosolids or sewage sludge produced at your lucilily for the reporting period(in dry metric loneyl" 88102 3.Hos ifids or Sewage Sludge Management PPANPDLS regulations at 40 M503 only require reporting fur kind application,surface disposal,or incwemtwn.You have the option to select'"her Management Practice-ifyou wish to provide more information on how you manage your sewage sludge or biusolids. Please use the selections below to identify how sewage sludge or biosolids generated or produced at your facility was managed,used,or disposed by you or your facility for the reportmg period.You can use the button below to add as many Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(S )sections as needed to describe how you manage your sewage sludge. SSUID See,ion Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(SSUm):001 Management Practice Type Handler,Preparer,or Applier Type• Management Practice 4tail' Land Application Off-Site Third-Parry Handler or Applier Agricultural land Applicatan Please Note:Land Application includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give away)ofClass ALi2.`OffSite Third-Party Handler or Applier mites to third parties which do not change the quality ofthe Biosohds.'Dff- Site Third-Party Prepame'refrs to a third patty wish changes the quality ofthe Iiosolids. Bids or lag/Container* Pathogen Class* W1ume Amount(drymOmi tons)* Hilt Class B 23570 Pollutant Concentrations: Did the teary land apply bulk sewage sludge when one or more pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentration in Table 3 of40 CPB503.137" OYes Oi No O Unknown Name of Off-Site Third-Parry Handler,Preparer,or Applier for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information forthe OR-Site Third-Party Handler,Prepare,or Appherfrrthis Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier.You mayoptionally lookup a NPDPSIDro anto-populate this information.Iffields remain blank after clicking the lookup button,then no data exists and you must enterthe information. Off-Site Third-Party Handler,Prepare,or Applier Information NPDBSID(ffknown) Page 7 of 26 Facilay/Company Name" T le Ranch/Ag-Tech Addrea 43N EAshknA. ay* State" Zip Code" Fresno "mu 93726 Off-Site Third-Party}Iandler,Prepareq or Applier Contact Information First Name• lest Name Title' Amen Magan Owner Phone(10digits,No dasbes)' W. &Mad Address 5599709432 kuft&) stexp.com Mosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to s entify the pathogen reduction options used by your facility far this sewage sludge unque identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply). Cade Pathogen Reduction Option Class A(must also demonstrate that meet fecal col8arm or salmonella limits) ❑ BI Class B-Ahemative I Fecal Callum Geometric Mean B21 Class BAltemativc 2 PSRP L Armbc Digestion R22 CcmMemative 2 PSRP 2:An Drying ® B23 Class gNtermarw 2 PSRP 3:Anaerobic Digestion B24 Oars Memative 2 PSRP 4:Composting B25 Class PAltemative 2 PSRP 5:IBne Stabilization ❑ M Class Mernative 3:PSRP Equivalency pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Page 8 of 26 Bioselids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by put facility or anotherperson/facilitytorthis sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply). Vector Attraction Reduction Options ® VR1 Option l-Wlitde Solids Reduction VR2 Option 2-Bench-Scale VAntde Solids Reduction(Anaerobic Beach Teat) ❑ VR3 Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Amiable Bench Test with Percent Solids ofTwo percent or less) VR4 Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake are ❑ VR5 Option 5-Aerabic Poncessang Obe,nophilic Aerobic Digestion/Composting) VR6 Option 6-Alkaline Treatment W Option 7-Drying(Bgnot to or treater than 95 Percent) mut Option 8-Drymg(FA ral to or Greater than 90 Percent) VR9 Option 9-Sewage Sludge Injection ® MU Option I0-Sewage Sludge Tnnely lucorporation into land ❑ VRII Option II-Sewage sludge Covered at the End ofPach Operating Day Noncom,liance Rammamn Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPA's Federal sewage sludge program requirements(see 40 CF1003)for this facility during the repotting period.&A notes that any person who prepares sewage sludge(e.,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a material from sewage sludge)shall ensure that the app 0cab le requirements in&Ks biosodds regulations(40 CFR5033 are met when the sewage sludge is applied to the land,placed on a surface disposal site,or feed in a sewage sludge incinerator(see 40Q 5039). Land Application Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or sold or gave away sewage sludge in a bag or other container when one ormore pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceding pollutant limit(sac Table 1 of40 CPR503 13). Facility Failed to properly collect and analyze its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequency and approved analytical methods as order to obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding times)(see permit requirements and 40(M003 8). Facility had deficiencies with pathogen reduction(see 40 CFR509 321. ❑ Facility bad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 tTR 503331. Mod application ofbulk sewage sludge likely to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 ofthe Endangered Species Act orits designated criticalhabimt(see 40i 09141ay1. Brlksewage sludge was app Red to agricultural land,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation she that was flooded,frozen,or snow-covered such that the bulksewage sludge entered a wetland orotherwaters of the United States,as defined to 40 CPR 112 2 except as provided in a permit issued pursuant to Section 402 or 404 ofthe(AA(sec 40 CPR 503 14(b)). ❑ Bilk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,or reclamation site was 10 meters or less from waters ofthe United States,as defined io 40(11122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(see 40 CFR503.I4(c)1. Bulk sewage sludge was appbed to agrculterral land,forest,a pub he contact she,or reclamation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate for the bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofs reclamation site,otherwise specified by the permitting authority(see 40 M503.14I1)k Page 9 of 26 One or more label or information sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given may for land application(see 400R503146ell. Bak,sewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 4503 13(b)(24 have been reached. The required notice and information was not provided to the land application applier(see 40 CFR503 12(B and fell. The required notice and orientation was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40 IRR503.12(1l). The required notice was not provided to the permitting authority for the Stale in which bulk sewage sludge was applied tithe bulk sewage sludge was applied to land in a Slate other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40 CFR503 IN)and 6p ❑ The facility faded to keep the necessary records for preparers and appliers during the reporting period(see 40 CFR50327) When sewage sludge that meets acts Bpathogen reduction requirements,but not Qass A is applied to the land,additional site reatiictions must be met.Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPA'sFedeml sewage sludge aass Bpathogen reduction requirements(see 40 M50331 for this facility during the reporting period. Food crops with harvested pans that touched the sewage sludge/soil mature(such as melons,cucumbers,squash,etc.)were harvested witbin 14 months after application ofsewage sludge(see 40 CFR503 320b951 Vail with harvested pans the soil surface(root cro r pssuchas potatoes,taots,radishes)were harvested within 20 months after application ofsewage sludge and the sewage sludge remained on the Ind surface for four months or longer ngerprior to incorporation into the soil(see 60 CFR50332fbN5NJ11. Food crops with harvested pans below the sod surface(root crops such as potatoes,carrots,rodishes)were harvested within 38 months after application ofthe sewage sludge and the sewage sludge remained on the land surface for ess than for months priorto incorporation into the soil(see 40 GFR503.32(b)(5)(it Food crops,fed crops,and hoer crops were harvested within 30 days after application ofsewage sludge(me 40 CFR 503 32(bN5NivR Animas were grand on a site within 30 days after application ofsewage sludge(see 40 CFR503 32(b)(SNv)). ❑ Tudwas harvested within 1 year after application ofeewage sludge ifthe turfwas placed on land with a high potential for public exposures or lawn,unless otherwise specified by the perm@ting authority(see 40 M50332(b)(5Yvi11. Public access to land with high potential for public exposure was not restricted for 1 year after application ofsewage sludge(see 40 CFR503.32(bN5Nvulk Public access to land with a low potential for public exposure was not restricted mr30 days after application ofsewage sludge(see 40 CFR503 32(bNSNviiill. SS Section Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier ISSUED):002 Management Practice Type Handler,Prepareq or Appber Type' Management Practice Detail' Land App hcntion Off-Site Third-Party Prepare, Distribution and Marketing-Compost Please Note:Iand Application includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give away)of0ass ABQ.'OffSYte Thud-Party Handler or Applier're fen to third parties which do not change the quality ofthe elosolids."Ofi Site Third-Party Paeparer'refrs to a third party which changes the quality ofthe eiosolids. Balk or flag/(Dontainer• Pathogen Uase' Warne Amount(drymetnic tons)" Bulk Oa.AEQ(aale/giveaway) 2T36 Pollutant Concentrations: Did the facility land apply bulk sewage sludge when one or more pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentration in Table 3 rf40�?" OYes Q No O Unknown Name of0ff-Sites nird-Party Handler,Prepareq or Applier for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information inrthe Off-Site Third-Party Handler,Prepareq or Appler mrths Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier.You mayoptionallyluokup a blPDPS]Dto auto-populate this information.Iffields remain blarakaftemheiring the Lookup buron,than no data exists and you must enterthe information. OR-Site Third-Party Handler,Prepareq or Applier Information Page I0 of 26 NPD®D(ifkvowv) Facility/Company Name" inland Bnphe Regional Compostmg Amhomy Md.. 12645 61h Sheet Uy" &ate• Zip Code" gaucho C4camonga "ru 91739 Off-Site Third-Party Handle,Prepare,or Applier Canlact Information First Name Last Name' Title' Jeff Tugenbein F achy Manager Phone(10-digits,Nodashes)' FXt. &Mad Address 9099931981 jziegenbein@ieua.arg Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the pathogen reduction options used by your facility for this sewage sludge unique identifier for me reporting period(check one or more that apply). Cade Pathogen Reduction Option Class A(must also demonstrate that meet fecal coliform or salmonella limits) Al /ass A-Alternative l:Time/Temperature A2 Class AAltemative2:PHTemperamre/Percent Sobds A3 (ass A-Ahemative3:Test Brterc Yunses and Helmmth ova;Operating Parameters A4 (ass A-Altemative 4:Test Babette Viruses and Hehamth ova;NO New Solids ® A51 Gass A-Alternative S PFRP L Composting A52 (ass A-Altemative S PFRP 2:Heat Drying A53 Class A-Alternative S PFRP 3:Bquid Heat Treatment A54 (ass A-Altemative S PFRP 4:Thermophdic Aembc Digestion(ATAD) A55 (ass A-Alterative S PFPRS:Beta gay madction A56 (ass A-Altemative S PFPR6:Lemma Ray Irradiation A50 (ass AAlternative S PFRP]:Pasteumaatmn A6 Class A-Altemative 6:PFRP Equivalency ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Page 11 of 26 Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by put facility or anotberpersoNfacktyforthis sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply) Vector Attraction Reduction Options ® VRI Option l-Wfatde Solids Reduction VU Option 2-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Anaembic Bench Test) ❑ W Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aerobic Beach Test with Percent Solids ofTwo Percent or Iess) W Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake Role ® VR5 Option 5-Aerabic Processing Obennopbilic Aerobic Digestion/Composting) VR6 Option 6-alkaline Treatment W Option 7-Drywg(Fgnot to or Greater than 75 Percent) mut Option 8-Drying flu gal to or Greater than 90 Percent) Nenaom rliance Say acting Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPAa Federal sewage sludge program requirements(see 40 CFR503)for this facility during the reporting period.FPAnotes that any person who prepares sewage sludge(i.e,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a material&am sewage sludge)sha0 ensure that the applicable requirements m FPXs biosclids regulations(40 M5031 annual when the sewage sludge is applied to the land,placed on a surface disposal site,or fired in a sewage sludge incinerator(sea 40 M503.71. Land Application Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or said or gave away sewage sludge in a bag or other container when one ormore pollutant concentrations io the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceding pollutant Iim6(sea Table 1 of40 CPR503.131. Facility failed to properly collect and analyee its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequenry and approved analytical methods in order to obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding times)(see permit requirements and 40(PR5O3 8). Facility had deficiencies with pathogen redumiou(see 40�j). Facility bad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 CFR503.331. Unit application ofbulk sewage sludge hkety to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 oftbe Brdangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat(see 40 CFR503.14fa31 Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agriculural land,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation site that was flooded,bunch,or snow-covered such that the bulk sewage sludge entered a wetland orotherwatem of the United States,as defined in 40 M 1222,except as provided in a permit issued pursuant o Section 402 or 404 oflhe MA(see 40 M503.14(b)). Bilk sewage sludge was app bed to agricultural land,forest,or a reclamation site was 10 meters or less Soon waters ofthe United Rates,as defined io 40 QFR 122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(see 40 CFR503 14(cll. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact sHe,ora reclamation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate foribe bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofa reclamation site,otherwise specified by the petmitnng authority(see 40 t}R503 I-W. ❑ One or more label or in formation sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given away for land appRation(see 40[PR503.14(eu. pak sewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 003 130,H2l have been reached. ❑ The required notice and inPormation was not provided to the land application appber(see 40 CFIt503.12M and in Page 12 of 26 ❑ 'Ore required notice and intbrmadon was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40 CPR503.12fh11. ❑ Mae required notice was not provided to the permitting authority far the State in wb ch bulk sewage sludge was applied ifthe bulk sewage sludge was applied to land in a State other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40 CTR503126)and(i . 96e facility failed to keep the necessary records for preparers and appinm during the reposing period(see 40 CPR 503271. SSUIL)Section Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(SSM):003 Management Practice Type Handler,Preparer,or Applier Type' Management Practice Mmil* Land Application Off-Site Thhd-Party Preparer Distribution and h1arketmg-Compost Please Note:had Application,includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give away)of©ass AEQ.`UffSte Third-Patty Handler or Applier're&m to thed panes which do not change the quality oftbe Bosolids.'D& Ste Third-Pany Preparer're&rs to a third patty which changes the quality ofthe 9osolids. Bulk or Beg/Camawer* Pathogen Gass* Wlume Amouut(dry metric tons)* Balk UaasAH)(sale/giveaway) 1327 Po[Intent Concentrations: Did the facility lend apply bulk sewage sludge when one or more pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentration in nble 3 of40 CPR503.137 OYes 0 No O Unknown Name of Off-Site]bird-Party Handler,Preparer,or Applier for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information forthe Off-Ste Third-Patty Handler Preparer or Appber forthu Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier You mayopOonally lookup a NPDhS]D w auto-populate this mformatitm Iffields remain blankaRerclickmg the lookup button,then no data exists and you must enterthe information. Off-Site Third-Party Handler,Preparer or Applier Information NPD®m(if crown) PacJay/Company Name Eberly Compost Pddrea 12421 Holloway Rd. ay. &ate* zip Code fast HJls "me 93249 Off-Site Third-Party Handler Preparer,or Applier Contact Information Fast Name• last Name• 'IRle Patrick McCasby Ste Manager Phone(10digits,No dashes)' at. &MaJAddmss 6617972914 patre ecasbyrQinccasbyfanns.enm Bosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the pathogen reduction options used by your hardly for this sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply). Page 13 of 26 Code Pathogen Reduction Option Gass Almost also demonstrate that meet fecal coliform or salmonella limits) ❑ Al Oars A-Altemative l:i e/Temperatum ❑ A2 Class A-Altemative 2:pH/Tempemure/Percent Sobds ❑ A3 Class A-Altema[ive 3:Tes[Fr[enc Viruses and Hehnmth ova;Operating Pmameters ❑ A4 OasshAhsmativa,tTest Enteric Viruses and lialmmth ova;No New Solids ® MI Gass A-Altcmative S PFRP 1:Composting ❑ A52 Gass A-Ahemative S PFRP 2:Heat Drying ❑ A53 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 3:liquid Heal Treatment ❑ A54 Gass hAhcnnative S PFRP 4:ghermophitio sombre agestion(ATM) ❑ A55 Class A-Altemative S PFPRS:Beta Ray Irradiation ❑ Am Gass A-Ahem Live S PFPR6:Comma Ray Irradiation ❑ A50 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 7:Pastemonstlon ❑ A6 Gass A-Altemative 6:PFRP Equivalency ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by your facJky or another person/facility for this sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply) Vector Attraction Reduction Options ® VRI Option l-Volatile Solids Reduction ❑ VR2 Option 2-Bench-Scale VolatJe Solids Raductiov(Anaambic Beach Test) ❑ Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aerobk Beach Teat with Percent Solids mfTyo Vm Percent or less) ❑ VR4 Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake Fate ® VRS Option 5-Aerobic Processing flhermoplulic Aerob is Digestion/Composting) ❑ VR6 Option 6-Aialine Treatment ❑ VR] Option]-DhyingA mal to or Greater than lS Percent) ❑ VRS Option 8-Drying(Equalto or Greater than 90 Percent) Nonctma fiance factorial, Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPA's Federal sewage sludge program requhements face 40 CFR503)for this facility during the repotting perio 1.&A notes that any person who prepares sewage sludge be.,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a maternal from sewage sludge)shall ensure that the applicable requirements N FPNs bwsobds regulations(40 01R503)an met when he sewage sludge is applied to the land,placed on a surface disposal site,or feed lo a sewage sludge mciaerator(see 40t 5039). Page 14 of 26 land Application ❑ Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or sold or gave away sewage sludge or a bag or other container when one tumorn pollutant concentrations N the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceiling pollutant fruit(see Table 1of40( 503.131. Facility faded to properly collect and analyse its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frdquencyand approved analytical methods m orderto obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding tines)(see permit requirements and 40(TR501R). Facility had deficiencies with pathogen reduction(see 40�j). Facility had deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 C 503331. Iaud application ofb alit sewage sludge likely to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 mfthe Endangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat(see dl CPRSo3_l4gU.. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural laud,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation site that was flooded,frozen,or snrw.crvcwd such that the bulk sewage sludge entered a wetland or ther waters of the On tied States,as defined in 40 M 1122 except as provided in a permit issued pursuant to Section 402 or 404 ofthe C A(see 40(1R503141,1), 9rlk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,or reclamation site was 10 meters or less from waters ofthe United States,as defined N 40(FR 122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(sec 40(T�'R503 14(r)1. bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact site,or recamation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate for the bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case on reclamation site,otherwise specified by the permiumg authority(see 40(TR503 14(d)). ❑ One or more label or in formation sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given away for land application(see 40(TR50314leA ❑ Brdcsewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 003 13(b)(2l have been reached. ❑ The required notice and information was not provided to the land application appher(see 40 CFR503.12(tl and in The required notice and information was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40(TR 503 12dH. The required active was not provided to the permitting authority for the State in which bulk sewage sludge was applied tithe bulk sewage sludge was applied to hand in a Slate other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40=50312(i)and fil). The Steady faded to keep the necessary records for preparers and apphers during the reporting period(see 4o<t�27). SSUIDSection Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(SSUfty:004 hanagement Practice type* Handler,Preparer,or Applier Type* Management Practice Detail* Land Apo lication Off Site ird-Party Preparer Agricultamilaod Appficaton Please Note-lend Application includes the distributor and marketing(sale or give away)ofGass AEQ.'U Ste Third Party Handhar or Also ier'refers to third parties which do not ebange the quality ofthe Wichita 'Off- Site Thad-Party Prepaper'refers to a than party which changes the quality ofthe Biosolide. bilk or lkrp ontainer* Pathogen Osss" Wlume Amount(drymetric tons)" Bulk Gass AEQ(saha/give way) I 92 Pollutant Concentrations: Did the hardly land apply bulk sewage sludge when one or more pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentration in Table 3 of40(PR503.139 O Yes Q No O Unknown Name ofrff-Site Third-Party Handler,Preparer,or Applier for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information bribe Off-Site Third-Party Handler,Preparer,or Appler forthis Sewage Sludge Unique Identif oYou may optionally bolt up a NPDES]Dto auto-populate this mfermatlon.Iffields remain blartkaRerebelding the bacteria button,them no data exists and you must enterthe information. Off-Site Third-Party Handler,Preparer,or Applier Information Page 15 of 26 NPD®D(ifkvowv) Facility/Company Name" Synagro-Nursery Products Address PO Be,1439 City" &ate• Zip Code" Helendale Tito-- 92342 Off-Site Third-Party Handler,Prepareq or Applier Contact Information Fast Name Lest Name' Title' Venny Vasquez Sae Manager Phone(10-0igits,Nodashes)' Isa. &Mad Address 7602655210 vvasquez@gynagm.com Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Phrase use the selections below to identify the pathogen reduction options used by your facility for this sewage sludge unique identifier for me reporting period(check one or more that apply). Cade Pathogen Reduction Option Class A(must also demonstrate that meet fecal coliform or salmonella limits) Al /ass A-Alternative l:Time/Temperature A2 (ass AAltemative2:pH/Temperamre/Pementsobds A3 (ass A-Ahemative3:Test 5rteric Vanses and Helmmth ova;Operating Parameters A4 Class A-Altemative 4:Test Babette Viruses and Hemunth ova;NO New Solids ® AS (ass A-Alternative S PFRP L Composting ❑ A52 (assA-Altemative S PFRP 2:Heat Drying A53 Class AAlterative S PFRP 3:Liquid Heat Treatment A54 (ass A-Altemative S PFRP 4:Thermophdic Aambc Digestion(ATAD) A55 ( .A-Alterative S PFPRS:Beta Fay madction A56 (ass A-Altemative S PFPR6:Lemma Ray Irradiation A50 Class AAlternative S PFRP]:Pasteumaatmn A6 (ass A-Altemative 6:PFRP Equivalency ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Page 16 of 26 Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by put facility or anotberpersoNfacktyforthis sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply) Vector Attraction Reduction Options ® VRI Option l-Wfatde Solids Reduction VU Option 2-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Anaembic Bench Test) ❑ W Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aerobic Beach Test with Percent Solids ofTwo Percent or Iess) W Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake Role ® VR5 Option 5-Aerabic Processing Obennopbilic Aerobic Digestion/Composting) VR6 Option 6-alkaline Treatment W Option 7-Drywg(Fgnot to or Greater than 75 Percent) mut Option 8-Drying flu gal to or Greater than 90 Percent) Nenaom rliance Say acting Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPAa Federal sewage sludge program requirements(see 40 CFR503)for this facility during the reporting period.FPAnotes that any person who prepares sewage sludge(i.e,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a material&am sewage sludge)sha0 ensure that the applicable requirements m FPXs biosclids regulations(40 M5031 annual when the sewage sludge is applied to the land,placed on a surface disposal site,or fired in a sewage sludge incinerator(sea 40 M503.71. Land Application Facility land applied bulk sewage sludge or said or gave away sewage sludge in a bag or other container when one ormore pollutant concentrations io the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceding pollutant Iim6(sea Table 1 of40 CPR503.131. Facility failed to properly collect and analyee its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequenry and approved analytical methods in order to obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding times)(see permit requirements and 40(PR5O3 8). Facility had deficiencies with pathogen redumiou(see 40�j). Facility bad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 CFR503.331. Unit application ofbulk sewage sludge hkety to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 oftbe Brdangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat(see 40 CFR503.14fa31 Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agriculural land,forest,a public contact site,or a reclamation site that was flooded,bunch,or snow-covered such that the bulk sewage sludge entered a wetland orotherwatem of the United States,as defined in 40 M 1222,except as provided in a permit issued pursuant o Section 402 or 404 oflhe MA(see 40 M503.14(b)). Bilk sewage sludge was app bed to agricultural land,forest,or a reclamation site was 10 meters or less Soon waters ofthe United Rates,as defined io 40 QFR 122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(see 40 CFR503 14(cll. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact sHe,ora reclamation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate foribe bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofa reclamation site,otherwise specified by the petmitnng authority(see 40 t}R503 I-W. ❑ One or more label or in formation sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given away for land appRation(see 40[PR503.14(eu. pak sewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 003 130,H2l have been reached. ❑ The required notice and inPormation was not provided to the land application appber(see 40 CFIt503.12M and in Page 17 of 26 ❑ 'Ore required notice and intbrmadon was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40 CPR503.12fh11. ❑ Te required notice was not provided to the permitting authority far the State in wb ch bulk sewage sludge was applied ifthe bulk sewage sludge was applied to land in a State other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40 CTR503126)and(i . Te facility failed to keep the necessary records for preparers and appinm during the reposing period(see 40 CPR 50327. SSUIL)Section Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier(SSl11D):005 Management Practice Type Handler,Preparer,or Applier Type' Management Practice Mmil* Land Application Off-She Thd-Party Preparer Distribution and h1arketmg-Compost Please Note:had Application,includes the distribution and marketing(sale or give away)of©ass AEQ.`UffSte Third-Patty Handler or Applier're&m to third panes which do not change the quality oftbe Bosolids.'D& Ste Third-Pany Preparer're&rs to a third patty which changes the quality ofthe 9osolids. Bulk or Beg/Camawer* Pathogen Gass• Wlume Amouut(dry metric tons)* Balk UaasAH)(sale/giveaway) 377 Po[Intent Concentrations: Did the facility lend apply bulk sewage sludge when one or more pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceeded a monthly average pollutant concentration in nble 3 of40 CPR503.137 OYes 0 No O Unknown Name of Off-Site Ttrd-Party Handler,Preparer,or Applier for this Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier Please complete the following information forthe Off-Ste Third-Patty Handler Preparer or Appber forthu Sewage Sludge Unique Identifier You mayopOonally lookup a NPDhS]D w auto-populate this mformatitm Iffields remain blankaRerclickmg the Iaokep button,then no data exists and you must enterthe information. Off-Site Third-Party Handler,Preparer or Applier Information NPD®m(if crown) PacJay/Company Name Synagro—Arun m Sods Md.. 5615 S 91st Avenue City. &ate• Zip Cade Tolleson Arimua 85353 Off-Site Third-Party Handler Preparer,or Applier Cantact Information Fast Name• last Name' Title 6aig Ccyer Senior Opemtione Manager Phone(10-digits,No dashes)' at. &Mad Address 6239366328 COeyer(SW)tORO.com Bosolids or Sewage Sludge Pathogen Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the pathogen reduction options used by your facility for this sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply). Page 18 of 26 Code Pathogen Reduction Option Gass Almost also demonstrate that meet fecal coliform or salmonella limits) ❑ Al Oars A-Altemative l:i e/Temperatum ❑ A2 Class A-Altemative 2:pH/Tempemure/Percent Sobds ❑ A3 Class A-Altema[ive 3:Tes[Fr[enc Viruses and Hehnmth ova;Operating Pmameters ❑ A4 OasshAhsmativa,tTest Enteric Viruses and lialmmth ova;No New Solids ® MI Gass A-Altcmative S PFRP 1:Composting ❑ A52 Gass A-Ahemative S PFRP 2:Heat Drying ❑ A53 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 3:liquid Heal Treatment ❑ A54 Gass hAhcnnative S PFRP 4:ghermophitio sombre agestion(ATM) ❑ A55 Class A-Altemative S PFPRS:Beta Ray Irradiation ❑ Am Gass A-Ahem Live S PFPR6:Comma Ray Irradiation ❑ A50 Gass A-Altemative S PFRP 7:Pastemonstlon ❑ A6 Gass A-Altemative 6:PFRP Equivalency ❑ pH pH Adjustment(Domestic Septage) Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Vector Attraction Reduction Options Please use the selections below to identify the vector attraction reduction options used by your facJky or another person/facility for this sewage sludge unique identifier for the reporting period(check one or more that apply) Vector Attraction Reduction Options ® VRI Option l-Volatile Solids Reduction ❑ VR2 Option 2-Bench-Scale VolatJe Solids Raductiov(Anaambic Beach Test) ❑ Option 3-Bench-Scale Volatile Solids Reduction(Aerobk Beach Teat with Percent Solids mfTyo Vm Percent or less) ❑ VR4 Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake Fate ® VRS Option 5-Aerobic Processing flhermoplulic Aerob is Digestion/Composting) ❑ VR6 Option 6-Aialine Treatment ❑ VR] Option]-DhyingA mal to or Greater than lS Percent) ❑ VRS Option 8-Drying(Equalto or Greater than 90 Percent) Nonctma fiance factorial, Please use the check boxes below to indicate any noncompliance with FPA's Federal sewage sludge program requhements face 40 CFR503)for this facility during the repotting perio 1.&A notes that any person who prepares sewage sludge be.,person who generates sewage sludge or a person who derives a maternal from sewage sludge)shall ensure that the applicable requirements N FPNs bwsobds regulations(40 01R503)an met when he sewage sludge is applied to the land,placed on a surface disposal site,or feed lo a sewage sludge mciaerator(see 40t 5039). Page 19 of 26 fend Application ❑ Facility land applied buhr sewage sludge or sold or gave away sewage sludge or a bag or other container when one motion pollutant concentrations m the sewage sludge exceeded a land application ceiling pollutant limit(see Table 1 of40 CFR503.131. Facility fated to properly collect and analyse its sewage sludge in accordance with the required monitoring frequencyand approved analytical methods m orderto obtain an accurate and representative sample (including appropriate method holding tines)(see permit requirements and 40(FR501R). Facility had deficiencies with pathogen reduction(see 40�j). Facilityhad deficiencies with vector attraction reduction(see 40 C1tR503331. Iaud application off,ulk sewage sludge only to adversely affected a threatened or endangered species listed under Section 4 ofthe Fndangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat(see 40 CPR503_l4go).. Bulk sewage sludge was ape lied to agricultural land,biresq a public contact site,or a reclamation site that was flooded,frozen,or snrw.crvcwd such that the bulk sewage sludge entered a wetland or ther waters of the United States,as defined in 40 M 1222 except as provided in a permit issued pursuant to Section 402 or404 ofthe CWA(see 40(FR503 14(bl). Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,or reclamation site was 10 meters or less from waters ofthe United States,as defined fir 40(FR 122.2,unless otherwise specified by the permitting authority(see 40 C 50314(c)l. Bulk sewage sludge was applied to agricultural land,forest,a public contact site,or a re lemation site at a whole sludge application rate that was greater than the agronomic rate for the bulk sewage sludge,unless,in the case ofa reclamation site,otherwise specified by the permiumg authority(see 4o C}R503 14W)).. ❑ One or more label or in formation sheet requirements were not met for sewage sludge that was sold or given away for land application(we 40( 50314leA ❑ Bdkeewage sludge was applied to land where the cumulative pollutant loading rates in 003 13(b)(2l have been reached. ❑ The required notice and information was not provided to the land application appher(see 40 CFR503.12(tl and in The required notice and information was not provided to the owner or lease holder ofthe land on which bulk sewage sludge was applied(see 40(M 50312(hl). The required notice was not provided to the permitting authority for the State in which bulk sewage sludge was applied ifthe bulk sewage sludge was applied to hand in a Slate other than the State in which the bulk sewage sludge was prepared(see 40=50312(i)and fil). the faNity faded to keep the necessary records for preparers and applieve during the reporting period(see 40Lt0327). ® Please select this checkbox to continue completing the form. If you wish to change the SSUID section(s)above,uncheck this box.- lfoseWs Monitoring Data INSTRUCDONS:These monitoring data should be representative ofthe sewage sludge that was applied to land orplaced on a surface disposalsee during the reporting year see 40 C 503.86a1.This section uses the frequency ofrommormg requirements m 40 CF1t503A6 and 50326.The billowing codes can be used as data qualifiers:T=Me Numerous to Corot,E—Estimated,N=No Dean. Page 20 of 26 Land Application Monthly Sample Table Sample Sample Period Stan Date Sample Period ad Time Sample I True Period 01-01-2017 01-31-2017 Sample 2 Tom Period 02-01-2017 02-28-2019 Sample 3 Three Period 03-01-2019 03-31-2017 Sample 4 Te Period 04-01-2017 04-30-2019 Sample 5 Tom Period 05-01-2017 05-31-2017 Sample 6Thai,Period 06-01-2017 06-30-2017 Sample 9 Tmm Period 07-01-2017 07-31-2017 Sample Slime Period 08-01-2017 08-31-2017 Sample 9T a Period 0941-2019 09-30-2017 Sample 10 Time Period 10-01-2019 10-31-2017 Sample I Time Period 11-01-2019 I1-30-2019 Sample 12 Time Period 1241-2017 12-31-2017 Maximum Pollutant Concentration Data for All Sewage Sludge Applied to land' This section summarizes the maximum pollutant concentrations in sewage sludge that was applied to land during the reporting year,m accordance with 40=503.13(a),FPA's sewage sludge regulations prohibit land application ofbulk sewage sludge or sewage sludge sold or gave away sewage sludge in a bag or other container when one or more sewage sludge pollutant concentrations in the sewage sludge exceed a land application ceiling pollutant limit(see Table 1 clod CFR 503 131.In order to identify noncompliance,EPA will compare the pollutant concentrations in this section against the ceiling concentration limits N Table 1 clan(TR503.13. Emsolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Than ofMeasare h1ky Weight) Semple Type Arsenic Ma'mum mg/kg WWOS Sample Sample Sample Sample S®ld.5 Sample = 9.1 1= I 18 1 16 = 9.1 = 9.3 = 10 Sample Sample Sample Sample 10 Sample I Sample 12 = 9.6 1= 1 12 = 11 = 10 = 8.6 = 12 Page 21 of 26 Hosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Pammeter Measurement Type tail ofMeasure(➢ry Weight) Sample Type Cadmium mg/kg ma s SampleI Suvple2 Sample3 Sampled Sample Sample6 6.6 6.1 92 1= 5.6 5.8 1= 4] Sample] Sample8 S.Ple9 Sample 10 Sample I Sample 12 5.1 99 55 1= 5.9 72 = 5.3 Hosolids or Sewage Sludge Manhored Parameter Measurement Type haft ofMeamm(Dry Weight) Sample Type Copper Madmum mg/kg OOMPOS Sample) &anple2 &anple3 Sample4 Sample Sample6 460 500 450 1= 460 1= 520 1= 460 Sample'/ Sample 8 Sample 9 Sample 10 Sample I Sample 12 490 630 500 = 430 = 440 = 440 go solids or Sewage Sludge Miaitored Parameter Measurement Type Uait ofMasure(DU Weight) Sample Type Inad Maximum mg/kg OMh s Sample) &auple2 &anple3 Sample4 Sempk5 Sempk6 12 16 13 11 13 13 Sample] Sample8 Sample9 Sample 10 Semple I Sample 12 11 15 14 12 12 14 6oso0ds or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Ilan ofMeamr,(Dry Weight) Sample Type h1a., Mtximum mg/kg WD s Sample) &mnpk2 &mnple3 Sample4 Samples Sample 1.0 O36 O35 023 0.68 0.84 Sample] Sample 8 sample 9 sample 10 &aapk 11 Sample 12 0.82 1.1 1 12 0.91 0.80 0.63 9osolids or Sewage Sudge Monitored Pmameter Measurement Type Unit ofMaaeure(Dt Weight) Sample Type Molybdenum mg/kg MMPOS Sampel Sampk2 Sampk3 Sample4 Samples Sampk6 14 = V = ❑ = 16 = 15 = 14 Smnpk 9 Sample 8 &ample 9 Sample 10 sample 11 Semple 12 15 = 19 = 16 = 14 = 15 = 16 Page 22 of 26 Hosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Dail ofMeasure(I)ry Weight) Sample Type N kel mg/kg tDMPOS SampleI Sample2 Sample3 Sample4 Sample5 Sample 26 32 39 1= 31 29 1= 35 Sample] Sample8 Steeple Sample 10 Sample 11 Sample 12 34 1= 41 = 39 = 32 = 34 = 34 Hasolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofMeasum(Dry Weight) Sample Type Selenium Maxmum mg/kg CDMPDS Sample) Sample2 Sarople3 Sample4 Samples Sample6 45 4.9 1= I 81 = 5.3 1= 81 = 8.9 Sample 9 Sample 8 Sample 9 Sample 10 Sample I Sample 12 9.0 5.9 29 1= 5.9 1= 1 8.9 1= 1 6.6 Rosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofMcamm(DU Weight) Sample Type Zinc Maximum mg/kg ODMPOS Sample) Sample2 Sample3 Sample4 Semple5 SampIc6 760 800 Iwo 730 840 1 730 Sample 9 Smnple 8 Smnple 9 Sample 10 Sample 11 SampIc 12 750 960 1 1 810 1 700 1 1 750 1 930 6osolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Meammment Type Unit ofMeamm(Dry Weight) Sample Type Total Nitrogen CM plus Nitrate-Nltrim) Average mg/kg mMPO3 Sample) Ssmple2 Steeple Samplc4 Samplc5 Sample 49000 480M 490M 50000 52000 1= 1 53000 Sample] Sample 8 Sample 9 Sample 10 Sample 11 Sumplc 12 49000 410M 5MM 46000 49000 1= 48000 Monthly Average Pollutant Concentration Data for All Sewage Sludge Applied to lend This section summarizes the monitoring period average pollutant concentrations in sewage sludge that was applied to land during the reporting year. Page 23 of 26 Hosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Pammeter Measurement Type tail ofMeasure(➢ry Weight) Sample Type Arsenic Avemge mg/kg ma s SampleI Sample2 S.Ple3 Sample4 Sample Sample6 8.7 13 12 1= 8.8 9.0 1= 7.9 Sample] Sampk8 S.Pla9 Sample 10 Sample I Sample 12 8.7 11 9.6 1= 8.4 8.5 1= 10 Eiosolids or Sewage Sludge Manhored Parameter Measurement Type hart ofMeamm(Dry Weight) Sample Type Cadmium Avemge mg/kg COMPOS Sample) &anple2 &anple3 Sample4 Samples Sample6 61 5.8 6.5 = 5.1 = 5.3 = 4.3 Sample] S nple8 Smnple9 Sample 10 Sample I Sample 12 45 ]] 5.5 1= 5.9 1= 61 = 5.0 RosoWs or Sewage Sludge Manitored Parameter Measurement Tpe Unit ofMasure(DU Weight) Sample Type Copper Avenge mg/kg MO s B plel &auple2 Smnple3 Sample4 Sampk5 Sam&6 450 460 400 440 470 440 Sample] Smuple 8 SmnPle 9 Sample 10 Sample 11 Sample 12 480 590 480 420 420 430 6oso0ds or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Ilan ofMeamr,(Dry Weight) Sample Type Inad Avenge mg/kg ODMPOS Sample) &mnpk2 &mnpk3 Sample4 Samples Sample 12 15 12 11 E 11 13 Sample] Sample 8 sample 9 &ample 10 &aapk 11 Sample 12 10 15 13 12 12 14 9osolids or Sewage Sudge hlondomd Pammeter Measurement Type Unk offikasum(Dq Weight) Sample Type Mercury Averege mg/kg MMPOS Sampel Sampk2 Sampk3 Sample4 Sample Sampla6 0.76 = 0.72 = O34 = 0.63 = 0.65 = 0.76 Smnpk] Smvpk 8 &ample 9 Sample 10 sample 11 Sample 12 0.76 = 0.92 1= I L1 = 0.81 = 0]8 1 E 34 Page 24 of 26 Eiosolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Unh ofMeasure(1),Weight) Sample Type N kel Average mg/kg OOMPOS SampleI Suvple2 Sample3 Sampled Sample Sample 25 1= 28 1= 34 1= 30 1= 26 1= 34 Sample? Sample8 Steeple Sample 10 Sample 11 Sample 12 33 1= 38 1= 36 1= 31 = 32 = 34 Wsolids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofMeasum(13ry Weight) Sample Type Selenium Average mg/kg OOMPOS Sample) Sample2 Sample3 Sample4 Samples Sample6 E 3.1 E 3.9 E 5.5 = 5.3 = 7.4 = 8.0 Sample 7 Sample 8 Sample 9 Sample 10 Sample 11 Sample 12 79 1= 5] 1= 7.7 1= 5.6 1= 7.0 1 B 1 3.6 RosoWs or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type Unit ofMaaure(Dry Weight) Sample Type Zne Avenge mg/kg txt�s Sample) Sample2 Semple3 Sample4 Sampk5 Sam&6 740 720 850 710 760 700 Sa aple 7 Smnple 8 SmnPle 9 Sample 10 Sample l l Sample 12 730 910 780 700 1 1 720 1 660 Pathogens:©ass A FecalC Iiform" Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Montored Parameter Measurement Type Uait ofMeasum(Dry Weight) Sample Type FecalC Iifrm h Vgmm OmaB is SampeI Sampe2 Sanpe3 Sampled Sample5 Sampe6 N Satnple7 Sample8 Sample9 Sample 10 Sample ll Sample 12 N Pathogens:lass k Sahnonella Mosolids or Sewage Sludge Manitared Pamnster Measurement Type than ofMeasum(ay Weight) Samp le Type SaMonelle MPN per4 grams OOMPOS Sample) Sample2 Sampk3 Sampk4 Sampk5 Sample Sample 7 Sample 8 Sample 9 Sample 10 Sample 11 Sample 12 Page 25 of 26 Vector Attraction Reduction-Volatile Solids Options(Options 1-3)' Bmasdids or Sewage Sludge Monitored Parameter Measurement Type I)ait ofhleasure(Dry Weight) Sample Type Sdids,totalvolatlepemem.nmval Mmwum Percent SampleI Sample2 Sample Sample4 Sampk5 Sampic6 61 60 1 62 1 1 65 1 58 1 58 Sample 9 Smmple 8 Smaple 9 Semple 10 Semple 11 Sample 12 65 1 61 62 59 70 66 Additional Information Please enter any additional information in the comment box below(Emit to 3,900 characters)that you would Re to provide. Additional Attachments(maawum size 25 Mill File:2017_OCSD Annual_9maolids_Compliance_Repmt 503.pdf arlification rntbrmation Icertlfy,under penalty oflaw,that the information E this report was prepared undermydvection and supervision E accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gatherand evaluate this information.lam aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibilityoffne and imprisonment. Csrtifier6Mai1" Form Action" ossdapcsd.co Approve Page 26 of 26 APPENDIX E Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Biosolids Annual Report Form for Reporting Year 2017 ARIZONA ADEODEPARTMENT In ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AZPDES Individual Permits Unit _ �` 1110 W Washington Street Phoenix,Arizona 85007 Arizona Department f) (602)771-4689(voicemail)(602)771-4505(fax) of Environmental Quali Email to:biosolids@azdeq.gov BIOSOUDS OR SEWAGE SLUDGE ANNUAL REPORT FORM 1. Program Information: All preparers(Generators)and Land Applicators Must complete the following. Reporting Start Date:1/1/2017 Reporting End Date:12/31/2017 Date:2/7/2018 AZPDES Permit R('d applicable):Click here to enter text. Company name(Preparer/Applicator): Orange County Sanitation District Contact Name:Ross Coss Title:Laboratory,Monitoring and Compliance Manager Address:10844 Ellis Ave.,Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Phone:714-593-7508 E-mail:rcoss@ocsd.com Please select one of the following options pertaining to your obligation to submit a Biosolids Annual Report. My facility is a: (D POTW with a design Flow equal to or greater than 1 MGD Per Day ® POTW that serves 10,000 people or more ® Class I Sludge Management Facility as defined by 40 CFR 503.9 ❑ Biosolids Applicator(Complete Section 5 only) ❑Other Click here to enter text. What is the estimated total of volume of biosolids or sewage sludge generated at your facility(in dry metric tons)? 49,119 Were all biosolids removed from your facility sent to a landfill for disposal?No If yes,provide the name and address of the landfill(s).Click here to enter text. If all biosolids or sewage sludge was sent to a landfill for disposal, you do not need to complete the remainder of this form,as it is only applicable to facilities preparing bisolids or sewage sludge for land application. cemficaticna certify,under penalty of law,that the information and descriptions,have been made under my direction and supervision and under system designed to ensure that qualifed personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine whether the applicable biosolids requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including the possibility of fine and imprisonment. Signature: Date: 77r Za/F Title: L LfLI�f)!e ?itvr��•i+ r �Oovy1F N4 1 ) Page BIOSOLIDS SEWAGE SLUDGE ANNUAL REPORT 2. Generator/Preparers- Biosolids Storage and Treatment Processes 2.1 Please check the box next to the following biosolids or sewage sludge storage practices and treatment processes used on the sewage sludge or biosolids generated or produced at your facility during the reporting period. Storage Practices ❑ Biosolids are stored in lined lagoons or impoundments ❑ Biosolids stored directly on the ground Physical Treatment Processes ® Preliminary Operations(e.g. sludge grinding, degritting, blending ® Thickening(e.g.gravity floatation,centrifugation,belt filter press,vacuum filter) ❑ Sludge lagoon Pathogen Reduction Operations(PSRP) ❑ Aerobic Digestion ❑ Air Drying(or"sludge drying beds') ® Anaerobic Digestion ❑ Lower Temperature Composting ❑ Lime Stabilization Process to Further Reduce Pathogens(PFRP) ❑ Higher Temperature Composting ❑ Heat Drying(e.g.flash dryer,spray dryer, rotary dryer) ❑ Heat Treatment(Liquid sewage sludge is heated to temp of 356°F(180°C) or higher for 30 minutes ❑ Thermophilic Aerobic Digestion ❑ Beta Ray Irradiation ❑ Gamma Ray Irradiation ❑ Pasteurization 2 1 P a g e BIOSOLIDS SEWAGE SLUDGE ANNUAL REPORT 3. Generators/Preparers: Disposition of Biosolids or Sewage Treatment Sludge: 3.1 Attire beginning of the year,did you have any biosolids or sewage sludge stored on site or remaining from previous years?Include any amount that is being stored anywhere. No If yes provide the following information: CLASS A Biosolids Class B Biosolids Dry Ton Weight Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Pathogen Testing Choose an item. Not applicable Pathogen Reduction Method Choose an item. Choose an item. Vector Attraction Reduction Method Choose an item. Choose an item. Storage Locations Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. 3.2 At the end of the year,are any biosolids or sewage sludge stored on site? No If yes, provide the following information: CLASS A Biosolids Class B Biosolids Dry Ton Weight Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Pathogen Testing Choose an item. Not applicable Pathogen Reduction Method Choose an item. Choose an item. Vector Attraction Reduction Method Choose an item. Choose an item. Storage Locations Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. 3.3 Were biosolids or sewage sludge received from another facility during the year,such as another wastewater treatment plant or another APP permitted facility for further processing? No If yes provide the following information for each facility.Click the plus sign to create as many tables as needed. Name of Facility Location: CLASS A Biosolids Class B Biosolids Dry Ton Weight Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Pathogen Testing Choose an item. Not applicable Pathogen Reduction Method Choose an item. Choose an item. Vector Attraction Reduction Method Choose an item. Choose an item. Storage Locations Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. 3 1 P a g e BIOSOLIDS SEWAGE SLUDGE ANNUAL REPORT 3.4.Were biosolids removed from your facility for land application? Include all recipients, including haulers, name, phone number, land applicators, composters, drying facilities, EQB bagging facilities, bulk composting, etc. Name of Facility Tule Ranch/Ag-Tech Management Practice Type: Agricultural Land application Handler or Preparer Type: Off-Site Third-Party Handler or Preparer Management Practice Detail: Agricultural Land application Bag or Bulk Container: Bulk Container CLASS A Biosolids Class B Biosolids Dry Ton Weight Click here to enter text. 23,933 Pathogen Testing Choose an item. Not applicable Pathogen Reduction Method Choose an item. Alternate 4-aerobic digestion Vector Attraction Reduction Method Choose an item. Option 1-mass reduction Storage Locations Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. 4. Generators/Preparers : Biosolids or Sewage Sludge Analytical Methods Arizona regulations specify that representative samples of sewage sludge that is land applied,placed on a surface disposal site, or fired in s sewage sludge incinerator, must be collected and analyzed. These regulations specify the analytical methods that must be used to analyzed samples of sewage sludge. Parameter Method Number or Results(if tested) Comments (required if Author other) Pathogens Ascaris ova. No Analytical Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Method Used Fecal Coliform No Analytical Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Methods Used Helminth ova. No Analytical Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Methods Used Salmonella sp. No Analytical Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Bacteria Methods Used Total Cultural No Analytical Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Viruses Methods Used Metals Arsenic EPA Method 6010 - See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. Arsenic(ICP-OES) Management Compliance Report, appendices A,C, and E. 4 1 P a g e BIOSOLIDS SEWAGE SLUDGE ANNUAL REPORT Beryllium Other Beryllium See attached OCSD Biosolids EPA Method 6010-Beryllium Analytical Method Management Compliance Report,Appendix C. Cadmium EPA Method 6010 - See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. Cadmium(ICP-OES) Management Compliance Report,appendices A,C, and E. Chromium EPA Method 6010 - See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. Chromium (ICP-OES) Management Compliance Report, appendices A and C. Copper EPA Method 6010 - See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. Copper(ICP-OES) Management Compliance Report, appendices A,C, and E. Lead EPA Method 6010 - See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. Lead(ICP-OES) Management Compliance Report, appendices A,C, and E. Mercury EPA Method 7471 - See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. Mercury(CVAA) Management Compliance Report, appendices A,C, and E. Molybdenum EPA Method 6010 - See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. Molybdenum (ICP- Management Compliance OES) Report, appendices A,C, and E. Nickel EPA Method 6010 - See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. Nickel (ICP-OES) Management Compliance Report, appendices A,C, and E. Selenium EPA Method 6010 - See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. Selenium (ICP-OES) Management Compliance Report, appendices A,C, and E. Zinc EPA Method 6010 - See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. Zinc(ICP-OES) Management Compliance Report, appendices A,C, and E. Nitrogen Compounds Ammonia Nitrogen Standard Method See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. 4500-NH3 - Management Compliance Ammonia Nitrogen Report, appendices A,C, and E. Nitrate Nitrogen Other Nitrate See attached OCSD Biosolids EPA 300.0 Nitrogen Analytical Management Compliance Method 5 1 P a g e BIOSOLIDS SEWAGE SLUDGE ANNUAL REPORT Report, appendices A,C, and E. Nitrogen Standard Method See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. 4500-N-Nitrogen Management Compliance Report, appendices A,C, and E. Organic Nitrogen Other Organic See attached OCSD Biosolids Calculation Nitrogen Analytical Management Compliance Method Report, appendices A,C, and E. Total Kjeldahl EPA Method 351.2- See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. Nitrogen Total Kjeldahl Management Compliance Nitrogen Report, appendices A,C, and E. Other Ana es Fixed Solids No Analytical Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Method Used Paint Filter Test EPA Method 9095 - See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. Paint Filter Liquids Management Compliance Test Report,Appendix C. PH EPA Method 9045 - See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. PH (>7%solids) Management Compliance Report, appendices A,C, and E. Specific Oxygen Choose an item. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Uptake Rate TCLP EPA Method 1311 - See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. Toxicity Management Compliance Characteristic Report,Appendix C. Leaching Procedure Temperature No Analytical See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. Method Used Management Compliance Report,Appendix A. Total Solids Standard Method See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. 2540-Total Solids Management Compliance Report,Appendix A. Volatile Solids Standard Method See attached OCSD Biosolids Click here to enter text. 2540-Volatile Solids Management Compliance Report,Appendix A. No Analytical Choose an item. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Methods Used 6 1 P a g e ARIZONA ACE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTALQUALITY AZPDES Individual Permits Unit 1110 W Washington Street Phoenix,Arizona 85007 Arizona Department (602) 771-4689 (voicemail)(602)771-4505 (fax) of Environmental Quality �r� Email to: biosolids@azdeq.gov 5. Land Applicators: Specific information to be completed by Land Applicators Only Application Field Amount of Preparer Pathogen Vector Loading Nitrogen Conc. Type of Crop Agronomic Rate The Cumulative ID Biosolids Applied Treatment Attraction Rate (Organic + Grown After ofCrop Grown Sit /Location Concentration of Pollutants (in drytons) Method Reduction ammonium) Application Method (kilograms per hectare)in Soil eenrep[e: Aztec Tcn or ABC FRryI 350 CONS CC41558AIX.2 OpLZOR� K�OCYe COYro Aztec AZ 1. Click here to Click Click here to Click here Click here to Click here to Click here Click here to Click here to Click here to As=Click Cd=Click Cr=Click Cu=Click Pb=Click enter text. here enter text. to enter enter text. enter text. to enter enter text. enter text. enter text. here to here to here to here to here to to text. text. enter enter enter enter enter enter text. text. text. text. text. text. Hg=Click Mo=Click Ni=Click Se=Click Zn=Click here to here to here to here to here to enter enter enter enter enter text. text. text. text. text. 2. Click here to Click Click here to Click here Click here to Click here to Click here Click here to Click here to Click here to As=Click Cd=Click Cr=Click Cu=Click Pb=Click entertext. here enter text. to enter enter text. enter text. to enter enter text. enter text. enter text. here to here to here to here to here to to text. text. enter enter enter enter enter enter text. text. text. text. text. text. Hg=Click Mo=Click Ni=Click Se=Click Zn=Click here to here to here to here to here to enter enter enter enter enter text. text. text. text. text. Click As=Click Cd=Click Cr=Click Cu=Click Pb=Click here here to here to here to here to here to 71 Page BIOSOLIDS SEWAGE SLUDGE ANNUAL REPORT 3. Click here to to Click here to Click here Click here to Click here to Click here Click here to Click here to Click here to enter enter enter enter enter entertext. enter enter text. to enter enter text. enter text. to enter enter text. enter text. enter text. text. text. text. text. text. text. text. text. Hg=Click Mo=Click Ni=Click Se=Click Zn=Click here to here to here to here to here to enter enter enter enter enter text. text. text. text. text. 4. Click here to Click Click here to Click here Click here to Click here to Click here Click here to Click here to Click here to As=Click Cd=Click Cr=Click Cu=Click Pb=Click entertext. here enter text. to enter enter text. enter text. to enter enter text. enter text. enter text. here to here to here to here to here to to text. text. enter enter enter enter enter enter text. text. text. text. text. text. Hg=Click Mo=Click Ni=Click Se=Click Zn=Click here to here to here to here to here to enter enter enter enter enter text. text. text. text. text. S. Click here to Click Click here to Click here Click here to Click here to Click here Click here to Click here to Click here to As=Click Ccl Click Cr=Click Cu=Click Pb=Click entertext. here enter text. to enter enter text. enter text, to enter enter text. enter text. enter text. here to here to here to here to here to to text. text. enter enter enter enter enter enter text. text. text. text. text. text. Hg=Click Mo=Click Ni=Click Se=Click Zn= here to here to here to here to enter enter enter enter text. text. text. text. 8 1 P a g e APPENDIX F Biosolids Program History The history of OCSD's Biosolids Program is important to understand as we plan for the future. In order to maintain the integrity of this information for future generations, the historical information is maintained in this appendix. Program History • In 1971, OCSD entered into a long-term contract with Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Inc., a local fertilizer manufacturer, who hauled and composted the sludge off site. OCSD maintained contracts with Goldenwest Fertilizer Co. for several years until the firm lost their land lease for their composting operation in 1979. Contracts with other composting companies were also used during the 1970s. • In 1978, after notification that their contract with Goldenwest Fertilizer Co. would be ending in 1979, OCSD presented a proposal to the County of Orange to co-dispose sludge with municipal solid waste at Orange County landfills. Following approval by Orange County and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region (CRWQCB): OCSD established an air drying/composting site at Coyote Canyon landfill. OCSD used this site as a sludge-drying operation until 1981 when it was converted to an open-air composting facility. This was done to reduce odors and dry the sludge to the required 50% solids content prior to being blended with municipal solid waste. • The 50% solids requirement was set by the CRWQCB, by Order No. 79-55. In December 1982, the requirements were modified by Order No. 82-299. The new order reduced the required average solids content to 22.5%. In addition to the solids content requirements, the volume of refuse to sludge incorporated into the landfill was required to be a 10:1 ratio. After the new Order was issued and the treatment plant belt press dewatering system was installed, the air drying process was no longer needed and its operation was discontinued. • In 1974, OCSD began a cooperative regional sludge management study with the City of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the CRWQCB. By a joint powers agreement, the Regional Wastewater Solids Management Program' for the Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area (LA/OMA Project) had a separate staff and budget to develop a long-term solids reuse or disposal plan, including an implementation strategy for the Los Angeles/Orange County metropolitan areas. This extensive, six-year, $4.0 million study, which covered all aspects -of sludge processing and disposal, was completed in 1980. The conclusion was that each of the three entities would carry out its own sludge management program. For OCSD, land-based disposal and beneficial reuse were the study's preferred alternatives. 1 However, co-combustion and enclosed mechanical in-vessel composting alternatives at OCSD's Reclamation Plant No. 1 were added to OCSD's LA/OMA supplemental study when the recommended composting facilities were evaluated as being difficult to site. • In 1978 and 1983, OCSD brought activated sludge facilities online at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 respectively, which led to significant improvements of ocean water quality. By 1984, OCSD had replaced centrifuges that dewatered to about 20% with new belt presses at both plants. The new belt presses had to dewater to at least 22.5% in order to meet landfill requirements. As a result, waste activated secondary sludges were dewatered separately and sent to a private landfill. Clean Water Grant Funds aided in the construction of the important facilities improvements at Plant No. 2 including the activated sludge plant ($45 million) and sludge handling/process facilities ($30 million). • In November 1983, OCSD's Boards of Directors submitted a new Residual, Solids Management Plan to the EPA. The plan included both short- and long- tern compliance strategies. The short-term compliance plan involved the continued practice of trucking 22.5% solids to Coyote Canyon landfill for co- disposal with municipal waste until the landfill closed in March 1990. It also included hauling sludge to private landfills using OCSD's trucks or private contractors. The long-term plan included co-disposal at county landfills and off-site reuse/management by private contractors. • In November 1984, OCSD approved an interim sludge disposal program due to the limitation of the amount of sludge this could be co-disposed at Coyote Canyon. As part of this program, an agreement was made with BKK Corporation to take the balance of the sludge to the BKK-owned and operated in West Covina (Los Angeles County). This contract expired in late 1991. • In 1987, OCSD began a facilities master planning effort that culminated in July 19893he 1989 30-year master plan, "2020 Vision," established 11 major objectives for maintaining our excellent record of environmental and public health protection including, "Sludge Reuse: OCSD will continue to promote multiple, beneficial reuse alternatives for sludge and strive to increase beneficial reuse from 60% to 100%. We will develop at least one in-county land disposal alternative as a backup to guarantee long-term reliability." The goals are summarized below: o Continue discussions with the County of Orange pertaining to landfill -co- disposal options; o Pursue co-disposal options at out-of county landfills; o Continue and/or expand use of private contracts to reuse or dispose of sludge; o Pursue with Orange County Environmental Management Agency staff the use of sludge as the final cover for Coyote canyon's closure; 2 o Monitor the status of the; o Initiate a regular status review of OCSD management program that would provide centralized information in one location; o Hire a full-time sludge manager to coordinate OCSD' overall sludge reuse/disposal program (completed in August of 1989). • The goals noted above led to a series of new recycling options starting in in 1988 using three separate contractors. Two contracts were created with compost contractors, and one was created with an agricultural land fertilization contractor. Using these three contractors, OCSD recycled about 50% of their sludge from 1988-1991. • 1990: About 50% of the sludge is processed into compost by L. Curti Trpck & Equipment and by Recyc; Inc., or applied directly to agricultural land by Pima Gro Systems, Inc. The remaining 50% of the sludge is disposed in the BKK landfill in Los Angeles County. The dewatered sludge is hauled to the landfill and directly incorporated with municipal solid waste in conformance with operating requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles. Prior to March of 1990, landfill co-disposal was available at the Coyote Canyon landfill in Orange County and the BKK landfill. During this period 14% of the Districts' sludge went to Coyote Canyon and 36% went to BKK. • On June 24, 1991 a new solids handling storage facility (truck loading)was placed in service. Plant No. 1 Belt Press Dewatering Building M was placed in service in February 1983. Belt Press Dewatering Building C was placed in service in October 1988. By 2018, the belt presses will be replaced by centrifuges, the DAFTs will be replaced by thickening centrifuges, and truck loading will be rehabilitated. • Beginning in Beginning in November 1991, the Districts' Biosolids Management Program achieved a milestone of 100% beneficial reuse. Beneficial reuse allows the Districts to lower its management costs and eliminate the need to take up valuable landfill space. The program consisted of compost, direct land application, and a standby agreement to landfill the biosolids in the event of an emergency. Further benefits of switching to beneficial reuse was been a reduction in disposal costs. Beneficial reuse costed the Districts less than landfilling and was expected to become even more cost effective in the future as the market for compost material grows. About 73% of the biosolids are processed into compost by Pima Gro Systems, Inc. at the Riverside Recyc compost facility. The remaining 23% is applied directly to agricultural land by Ag Tech Company in Yuma, Arizona. • During 1993-94, only one biosolids contractor was used to haul and manage the OCSD's biosolids produced by Plant No. 1. Pima Gro Systems, Inc. 3 hauled the biosolids to the Recyc processing site in Riverside County where it was composted. The biosolids based compost was then sold to nearby farmers as a nutrient rich soil amendment and fertilizer. • In late 1994, the Ag Tech Company was contracted to use OCSD biosolids to enhance agricultural soils, reduce the amount of irrigation water needed, and provide a much needed source of organic humus. The biosolids were injected 6 inches to 15 inches beneath the surface (in the root zone)within hours of their arrival to permitted farm lands. • In June 1995, Bio Gro, a division of Wheelabrator Clean Water Systems, Inc., was added as a biosolids contractor. Biosolids were recycled on agricultural land in Riverside County. Pima Gro used commercial fertilizer spreaders to distribute the biosolids prior to incorporation on agricultural land in Kern County, California. • In March 1996, Tule Ranch was added as a biosolids contractor. Pima Gro was still recycling biosolids in Kern County, California, and Bio Gro was recycling biosolids in Riverside. No composting was reported. • In 1997, continued 100% beneficial reuse with all biosolids recycled via direct land application in Kern, Riverside, and San Diego counties. The Districts also entered into a one-year pilot project contract with Waste Conversion Industries, Inc. (WCI) to chemically treat and heat dry the Districts' biosolids at their Corona, California site. Due to mechanical difficulties, WCI was not able to process any of the Districts' biosolids. During fiscal year 1996-97, the Districts' biosolids management cost was reduced by approximately $1 million from that of fiscal year 1995-96. New and amended biosolids management contracts as well increased efficiency in the Districts' belt operation contributed to the decrease in biosolids management costs. Upon the expiration of the Ag Tech contract and the termination of the Hondo contract, the Districts maintained only two active biosolids management contractors, Bio Gro and . Pima Gro. In August 1996, having only two active biosolids management contractors, and receiving numerous unsolicited lower cost biosolids management proposals Districts' staff prepared and issued a Request for Proposals for Biosolids Management (RFP). The RFP was necessary in order to increase biosolids management diversity and reliability while decreasing costs. Eight biosolids management firms submitted proposals. Bio Gro proposed to maintain their existing contract, but unilaterally offered a pricing amendment, while Pima Gro submitted a new proposal that provided the Districts with the option of accepting the entire proposal or modify the pricing structure of the existing contract. 4 After extensive review and ranking of the proposals by staff, new contracts were offered to Tule Ranch and Waste Conversion Industries, Inc., while Bic Gro's and Pima Gro's existing contracts were amended to reflect their new price schedules. • In 1998 through 2000, continued 100% beneficial reuse with all biosolids recycled via direct land application in Kern, Kings, San Diego and Riverside counties. Pima Gro, Bic Gro, and Tule Ranch were OCSD's biosolids contractors. Small amounts of biosolids were composted at Pimo Gro's Riverside composting facility, Bio Gro's Arizona Soils facility in La Paz County, Arizona, and by Pima Gro for a UCR Extension research project in Imperial County. • In June 2000, OCSD purchased 1,800 acres of Tule Ranch's farm in Kings County, California, to provide a reliable, long-term site for treatment and land application of biosolids. Tule Ranch contracted to manage OCSD's biosolids its farm at a reduced cost per ton. • In 2001, Synagro purchased Pima Gro and Bio Gro, and OCSD added Yakima as a contractor. One-hundred percent beneficial reuse via direct land application in Kern, Kings, San Diego, and Riverside. Synagro also recycled biosolids to tribal land farms in San Bernardino County, California. Small amounts were composted in Riverside and tribal land. In 2001, Riverside County issued an ordinance that banned the use of Class B biosolids for land application but allowed limited use of Class A biosolids. In 2003, the restrictions were expanded to address nuisance problems related to Class A biosolids. Kern County's Class A requirement (Class B ban) went into effect in early 2002, and King's County followed in 2003 with only composted biosolids allowed after 2006. • In 2002, as staff began work on a large-scale long-range biosolids management plan and contentious local county Class B land application bans were on the rise, OCSD began increasing diversification away from land application and added more composting in Riverside County. Biosolids were also recycled on Fort Mohave tribal land in Mohave County, Arizona and Clark County, Nevada. • October 28, 2002 Yakima Co. began operations at their new biosolids management site in La Paz County, Arizona. The operation involved biosolids air drying to achieve material greater than 50% total solids and use as alternative daily cover at La Paz Landfill. A total of 4,628.09 wet tons (881.7 dry metric tons) of biosolids were managed through this process through 2002. This amount represents about 2% of the total District's biosolids material beneficially reused in land application operations during 2002. The District discontinued its use of the Yakima Co. for management of its biosolids 5 in early January 2003. The facility was later shut-down by the County of La Paz and a lawsuit was won against the County by Yakima for $9.2 million in damages. • In 2002, OCSD's Board of Directors voted to increase the level of treatment to full-secondary treatment requirements, which produced significantly more biosolids, especially between 2002 to 2005, until the new dewatering centrifuges could be constructed and implemented at each plant (2018-2020). OCSD's focus through the 2000's was on building the water-side capital facilities to meet this increased level of service. • In 2003, OCSD continued to encourage contractors to diversify its biosolids options, especially in Arizona and Nevada. OCSD started using Arizona Soils in La Paz County, Arizona on a regular basis. OCSD additionally piloted Tule Ranch's subcontractor, Universal, to utilize farms in Wellton and Dateland, Arizona for land application of about 6% of OCSD's biosolids. Tule Ranch's Class A lime stabilization process was started in order to continue recycling biosolids in Kern and Kings Counties. A small amount of biosolids was used in Maricopa County, Arizona. In addition, OCSD started using Solid Solutions to recycle biosolids in Nye County, Nevada to further diversify the biosolids management program. Solid Solutions was a subcontractor to California Soils Products who had a 2002 contract with OCSD to render biosolids into a treated soil product. By March 2004, OCSD pulled out of Nye because of a hearing with complaints from affected neighbors, local competition with dairy manure, and a letter from Nevada congressional representative, Harry Reid, whose brother was a local resident. This episode also captured the attention of the 2003-04 Orange County Grand Jury who performed an investigative study and published a report: htto://www.occirandFury.ora/odfs/biosolids.l)df. OCSD concluded its use of Solid Solutions in 2005 when it was clear that the Soil Products facility would not materialize. • In December 2003, OCSD finalized a Long Range Biosolids Management Plan that set forth the following recommendations to ensure a sustainable biosolids management program. These recommendations were implemented over the following decade. o Maintain at least three different product-manufacturing options at any given time. o Optimize capital and operations and maintenance (O&M) costs at OCSD's treatment plants as part of implementation of the long-range plan. o Limit maximum participation for any market to one-half of the total biosolids production. 6 o Limit biosolids management contracts to a maximum of one-third of total biosolids production per merchant facility, and one-half per contractor (for contractors with multiple product manufacturing facilities). o For each OCSD-owned product manufacturing facility, limit the size to one-half of the total biosolids production. o Explore funding options for in-county facilities (private capital, OCSD capital, or both). o Allocate up to 10 percent of biosolids for participation in emerging markets. o Pursue Orange County-based product manufacturing facilities and maximize the use of horticultural products within the OCSD service area by member agencies and through developing public-private partnerships. o Maintain capacity and options at OCSD's Central Valley Ranch. o Pursue failsafe backup options (landfilling, alternative daily cover for landfills, and dedicated landfilling) to acquire a 100 percent contingency capacity. • From November 1991 through December 2004, OCSD achieved 100 percent beneficial reuse of its biosolids mostly through the use of land application with some composting. • In 2004, OCSD started ramping up the land application in Arizona through Tule Ranch's Dateland operation, from about 10% in 2003 to 20% in 2004. OCSD also ramped up it's use of compost sites in California and Arizona from about 7% in 2003 to 20% in 2004. • In January 2005 and 2006, OCSD sent a small fraction of its biosolids to two landfills in Arizona (Copper Mountain and South Yuma County Landfill) in order to increase the diversity of its biosolids management options, as well as address the operational needs caused by wet weather periods. The routes to these two landfills were not impacted by severe weather. • Starting in 2006, Synagro eliminated their last remaining OCSD land application (Maricopa County), as fuel prices hit record highs, and focused on composting services. On December 27, 2006, Synagro's new composting facility (South Kern Compost Manufacturing Facility) came online. This was the first long-term contract to become operational as an outcome of the 2003 Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan. • In 2007, with OCSD's contract that guaranteed at least 250 tons per day to Synagro's new facility, OCSD's biosolids allocation to compost facilities expanded to its current level of about 50% of its total biosolids production. These facilities have extensive permitting and regulatory oversight and reporting, improved public outreach with neighbors and local communities, 7 and have more air quality and odor process controls. Today's framework is more sophisticated than what was in place two decades ago. Land application was also allocated about 50% of OCSD's portfolio with half of that as lime-stabilized Class A in Kern County and half as Class B in Yuma County, Arizona. • In March 2007, OCSD stopped actively using landfills and maintained this option only as a failsafe backup. OCSD re-gained its 100 percent recycling performance from 2008 through 2012 (excluding some digester cleanings). • In August 2007, the Orange County Water District's (OCWD) Advanced Water Purification Facility, later called the Ground Water Replenishment System (GWRS), started taking an average of 30 MGD of Plant No. 1's secondary treated water to test their facility in purifying the water to meet drinking water standards. OCWD uses microfiltration and reverse osmosis. The water is used as a barrier for salt water intrusion and to recharge groundwater basins starting in January 2008. About 100 MGD of OCSD's secondary effluent produced about 70 MGD of purified water for reuse. Secondary effluent not sent to OCSD is sent as usual to Plant No. 2 to blend with treated wastewater from Plant No. 2 prior to ocean discharge through OCSD's 120-inch, 5-mile outfall. In 2015, an additional 20 MGD of influent sewage was diverted from Plant No. 2 to Plant No. 1 to support the GWRS expansion. GWRS purifies OCSD's secondary treated water from Plant No. 1 to meet drinking water standards. OCSD provides GWRS about 120 MGD of secondary effluent to produce purified water for reuse. • In October 2008, Synagro's Regional Compost Facility in Riverside County stopped receiving OCSD biosolids in order to prepare for the site's closure. The facility's conditional use permit was not renewed by the County of Riverside after homes were developed nearby and residents filed hundreds of odors complaints. • In late 2008, OCSD stopped using Tule Ranch's Kern County. This change in strategy culminated when the EnerTech facility started commissioning their process and Kern County required additional costly environmental studies to continue utilizing that option. OCSD's Kings County property was sold in December 2011. • As part of the 2003 Long Range Biosolids Management Plan implementation, OCSD issued a series of request for proposals in 2004. As a result, EnerTech Environmental, Inc. was awarded a 225-ton guaranteed-minimum contract in 2005, which was signed in May 2006. The Rialto facility was constructed and began commissioning on November 3, 2008. OCSD reallocated Tule Ranch's Kern County land application loads to EnerTech to meet contractual obligations. EnerTech's patented technology used heat and pressure to convert biosolids to a certified renewable energy pellet (E-fuel)that was 8 burned as a replacement for coal in local cement kilns. EnerTech encountered a series of technical and permitting setbacks during the commissioning process. During the start-up process, biosolids not processed at the Rialto facility were land-applied in Yuma County, Arizona by Terra Renewal (formerly Solid Solutions). In November 2010, EnerTech began implementation of a Single Train Technical Plan that was anticipated to address the issues and finish the commissioning process by March 2012. After a final extension and failure to meet contractual performance requirements, OCSD terminated its contract with EnerTech effective July 2012. OCSD re-allocated the EnerTech loads to our two remaining contractors, Synagro (composting) and Tule Ranch (land application), at about 50% each. • March 2009, OCSD began diverted settled sludge from Plant No. 1's primary clarifiers, along with about 2.5 MGD of belt press dewatering filtrate, to Plant No. 2's headworks, where they are mixed with the influent wastewater. OCSD built a new pump station at Plant No. 1, the Steve Anderson Lift Station, on order to bring more flow into Plant No. 1 to provide more flows to GWRS. However, the additional flows produced more solids than Plant No. 1 was equipped to handle during rehabilitation of its digesters and construction of its thickening and dewatering centrifuges, making the diversion of these solids to Plant No. 2 necessary. OCSD diverted the cationic dewatering filtrate to protect GWRS from the dewatering polymers. The sludge diversion is anticipated to continue until the new sludge thickening and dewatering facility (P1-101) at Plant No. 1 is operational in 2018 per the current CIP schedule. • In March 2010, OCSD sent a demonstration load to the City of Los Angeles Terminal Island Renewable Energy (TIRE) project via OCSD's contract with Tule Ranch. OCSD material was not compatible with their facility because the material required more screening than the City's biosolids. • In April 2010, Tule Ranch permanently moved their land application operations from Dateland, AZ to Yuma, AZ. • In January 2011, Tule Ranch formed an agreement with AgTech and managed OCSD biosolids at two sites (Desert Ridge and AgTech) in Yuma. The following year, Tule Ranch purchased the AgTech operations and integrated the two operations. Tule Ranch has continued land applying at both Yuma sites. • In 2012, OCSD met the new NPDES ocean discharge permit's treatment requirements for secondary treatment standards. With full secondary treatment facilities operational, the focus is now on asset rehabilitation, including solids treatment facilities. The Capital Improvement Program Annual 9 Report (www.ocsd.com/CIPAnnual) summarizes the projects and their progress. • In February and March 2012, OCSD's Plant No. 2 biosolids exceeded the Arsenic Table 3 Exceptional Quality Limit for fields 23110121, 2311013, 2311021, and 2311022, but were below Table 1 Ceiling Concentrations. OCSD's land application contractor, Tule Ranch, already reports Table 2 Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rates for all pollutants and all fields as part of their annual report to the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. • As directed by the Board's November 2011 Strategic Plan direction, OCSD executed an agreement with Orange County Waste and Recycling (OCWR) to manage up to100 tons per day of OCSD's biosolids at the Prima Deshecha landfill located in the city of San Juan Capistrano, California. This alternative provides OCSD a local biosolids management option during projected peak biosolids production period until 2017. As a result of the landfill start-up in 2013, OCSD is recycling about 94-97% of its biosolids, with the remaining biosolids going to the OCWR landfill. Landfill loads do not count towards recycling despite the indirect energy production from capturing methane onsite. OCSD sends the landfill about 1 truck per day of grit and screenings (non-recyclable material) and 3 trucks of biosolids per day (5 days per week when not impacted by rain) in order to keep some revenues and resources in-County (see also OCSD Biosolids Policy Board Resolution 13-03: ocsd.com/policy. However, after residential complaints in late 2016, biosolids loads to the landfill were on hiatus until operations moved further away from the phase of the housing development that opened in Fall of 2016. With the heavy rains received December through February 2017, the landfill was operating in a different section, and OCSD remained on hiatus. In February 2017, OCSD received direction to cease disposal of biosolids to the landfill. The amount of biosolids landfilled impacted the city of Fountain Valley, which is one of OCSD member agency. The City is required by CalRecycle to divert 50% of its solids waste from the landfill. Since OCSD is located in the city of Fountain Valley (host city), the tonnage of biosolids being landfilled counted against the city's solids waste diversion goal of 50% diversion. In response, OCSD stop hauling biosolids to landfill for disposal. • In November 2016, the Kern Measure E (2006) biosolids ban was struck down. A Tulare County Superior Court judge ruled that Kern County Measure E is invalid and unlawful. The Judge found that Measure E, the ordinance banning land application of biosolids in the unincorporated areas of the county, is preempted by state recycling laws and exceeded Kern's police powers. The judge granted a permanent injunction against enforcing Measure E. In September 2017, parties signed a settlement agreement allowing the City of Los Angeles to continue to land apply biosolids. 10 • OCSD completed a comprehensive Biosolids Master Plan (ocsd.com/BMP) that is providing a long-term framework for a sustainable, cost-effective biosolids management program. The Plan recommended building two- phased anaerobic digesters at Plant No. 2 to address seismic issues with existing digesters while creating an essentially pathogen-free biosolids product. In addition, OCSD will install a food waste receiving station at Plant No. 2. The food waste facility will support state and local organics recycling goals including the 2020 requirement to divert all organic (recyclable material) from landfills. Food waste will be co-digested to create more gas and electricity, as well as a few additional biosolids trucks. The interim food waste facility is expected to be online in 2021, and the new digestion complex is expected to start-up in 2030. The Master Plan also reviewed and updated the former program guiding principles. and formalized an updated set as the "Ten Tenets of OCSD's Biosolids Management Plan:' See the report text for a list of the tenets and OCSD's performance relative to them. • In 2017, Project P1-100 was completed. This project cleaned and rehabilitated each of the Plant No. 1 digesters. Routine maintenance is now targeting to cleaning digesters every five years. To that end, OCSD issued a new dry-ton based bid (previous bids based on gallons) that was awarded to Synagro to clean digesters at both plants. The first 5-year cleaning was performed on Digester 7 in 2017. • In 2017, OCSD established a biosolids compost demonstration planter at Plant No. 2 as part of an existing landscaping project. The planter uses the same native plants as nearby control planters that didn't use biosolids. Five and ten percent biosolids compost were amended into the soil. The landscape architects and soil laboratories did not want to use biosolids compost because of the salinity analyses, so OCSD intends this demonstration will show the assimilative capacity of biosolids that is not reflected in the laboratory analysis. If successful, this demonstration will also show that the plants survive and thrive when the laboratory analyses counter- indicate biosolids because the analyses do not necessarily directly correlate to the actual field performance, and because biosolids is a more complicated blend of compounds that allow assimilative bonds that have remediating effects. • OCSD is constructing new facilities that will replace the belt filter presses with new dewatering centrifuge facilities. The total percent solids of digested biosolids is anticipated to increase from 18% (Plant No. 1) and 20% (Plant No. 2) to 28-30%, resulting in approximately one-third fewer wet-weight solids and biosolids trucks to manage. In addition, this project is also installing pre- digestion thickening centrifuges to replace the dissolved air floatation 11 thickening at Plant No. 1, and rehabilitating the Plant No. 1 truck loading facility. The projects are anticipated to be complete in 2019. The Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) discharges its untreated solids (sludge) to OCSD. IRWD is currently constructing their own solids treatment facility and plans to cease sending their solids to OCSD by 2019. This cessation is anticipated to reduce Plant No. 1's influent solids by ten to fifteen percent. Figure 1: Biosolids Production History January 1992-December 2017(not including digester cleanings) 350,000 sae Bae 300,000 - IN 250,O0 'X •x" Ep X coo M 200.000 o R m150,00 AN 0 c f 300 q 100000 C rN-mual xel 1pB(en m) tW Q 50,000 Paz-amuai vei mrc(en ssl �cumdnm P7 n Pz amuai vex ima(tn seal 100 - -Panoasa P7 e m areaw mnuai wn we (ass at%) 1.W10aYw 12 Y 9� •9 i NE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Laboratory, Monitoring& Compliance Division 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 714.962.2411 www.ocsd.com 01/18