HomeMy WebLinkAbout98.04-26-2017 Board Supplemental ONLINE Agenda.pdf Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, April 26, 2017
Regular Meeting of the 6:00 P.M.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Board Room
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
(714)593-7433
SUPPLEMENTAL
AGENDA
The following item will be added to the Agenda:
NON-CONSENT ITEMS:
14. CLOSED SESSION ATTENDANCE BY DIRECTORS SERVING ON THE
BOARD OF AN ADVERSE PARTY (Jim Herberg)
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 17-07, entitled: "A Resolution
of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District Establishing
Requirements for Attendance at Closed Sessions by Directors Who
Simultaneously Serve on the Governing Body of an Adverse Party".
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
Supplemental Agenda was posted outside the main gate of the District's Administration Building located at
10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 2Vt
day of April 2017.
%q,9A�
Kell A. o e
Cle c o th Board
BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Dare TO Bd.of Dir.
-- 09/26/17
AGENDA REPORT ern Number Item Number
14
Orange County Sanitation District
FROM: James D. Herberg, General Manager
SUBJECT: CLOSED SESSION ATTENDANCE BY DIRECTORS SERVING ON THE
BOARD OF AN ADVERSE PARTY
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 17-07 entitled: "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the
Orange County Sanitation District Establishing Requirements for Attendance at Closed
Sessions by Directors Who Simultaneously Serve on the Governing Body of an Adverse
Party".
BACKGROUND
An Orange County Sanitation District (Sanitation District) Director may serve on the
governing body of another agency, even if the interests of the two agencies may
occasionally conflict, as long as the dual capacity in question is compelled or expressly
authorized by law. In legal terms, a Director may simultaneously serve on the boards of
agencies with potentially conflicting interests as long as the Legislature has "abrogated"
the common law doctrine of"incompatible offices" as to the particular offices in question.
Each Sanitation District Board member, for example, simultaneously serves on the
governing body of his or her member agency. Some Sanitation District Board members
also simultaneously serve on the governing boards of other agencies, as authorized by
law.
At the same time, Government Code Section 1126 allows an agency to declare that
specific types of activities by Board members are "inconsistent, incompatible, in conflict
with, or inimical to" his or her duties as a Board member.
Pursuant to the Brown Act, the Sanitation District Board can, and regularly does, meet in
closed session with legal counsel to discuss potential and pending litigation. The ability
to meet in closed session protects the Sanitation District's interest by encouraging open
and frank discussions between the Board and legal counsel outside the presence of the
adverse party. This interest could be severely compromised if an adverse party were to
gain access to closed session discussions.
On occasion,the adverse party in any potential or pending litigation may be another public
agency. On rare occasion, one or more Sanitation District Board members may also
serve on the governing body of this adverse party. In such an event, in order to protect
the Sanitation District's attomey-client communications from disclosure to the adverse
party, each Board member who sits on the governing body of the adverse party should
either (1) refrain from attending the Sanitation District closed session, or (2) disqualify
himself or herself from acting on the matter in any way in his or her capacity as a member
Page 1 of 3
12399 8.1
of the governing board of the adverse agency. The Sanitation District Board may, by
resolution, establish this rule pursuant to Government Code Section 1126.
RELEVANT STANDARDS
• Government Code Section 1126
PROBLEM
If a Sanitation District Board member simultaneously serves as a member of the
governing board of an adverse party, and the Board member attends a closed session of
the Sanitation District Board to discuss potential or actual litigation with that adverse party,
the Sanitation District's interests could be severely compromised.
PROPOSED SOLUTION
Adopt Resolution 17-07 requiring each Director who sits on the governing body of an
adverse party to either (1) refrain from attending Sanitation District closed sessions, or
(2)disqualify himself or herself from acting on the matter in any way in his or her capacity
as a member of the governing board of the adverse agency.
TIMING CONCERNS
A closed session item regarding anticipated litigation is on the agenda for the Board
meeting of April 26, 2017. Some Sanitation District Board members simultaneously serve
on the governing body of the adverse party.
RAMIFICATIONS OF NOT TAKING ACTION
The Sanitation District's interest in any potential or actual litigation with an adverse party
could be severely compromised if a member of the governing board of the adverse party
were permitted to attend the Sanitation District's closed session.
PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS
N/A
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The attorney-client privilege, a "hallmark of Anglo-American jurisprudence for almost 400
years,' protects the rights of clients to "freely and fully confer and confide in one having
knowledge of the law, and skilled in its practice." Soin v. O'Melveny& Meyers (2001) 89
Cal.App.411 451, 456-457. If attorney-client communications were disclosed to the
adverse party, a public agency's lawyer could not provide effective legal counsel. In any
particular case, a lawyer must advise his or her client on, among other things, the
strengths and weaknesses of the case and the parameters of possible settlement.
Roberts v. City of Palmdale(1993)5 Cal. 41h 363, 373. If the adverse party had a"ringside
seat" to these discussions, the client's interest would be severely compromised. Sutter
Page 2 of 3
123948.1
Sensible Planning, Inc. v. Sutter County Board of Supervisors (1992) 122 Cal. App. 3d
813.
CEQA
N/A
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
The following attachment(s)are included in hard copy and may also be viewed on-line at the OCSD website
(www.ocsd.com) with the complete agenda package:
• Resolution No. OCSD 17-07 (hard copy will be provided at the meeting)
Page 3 of 3
123948.1
RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 17-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ESTABLISHING
REQUIREMENTS FOR ATTENDANCE AT CLOSED SESSIONS
BY DIRECTORS WHO SIMULTANEOUSLY SERVE ON THE
GOVERNING BODY OF AN ADVERSE PARTY
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Brown Act, the Orange County Sanitation District (the
"District")Board of Directors(the"Board")can, and regularly does, meet in closed session
with legal counsel to discuss potential and pending litigation. The ability to meet in closed
session protects the District's interest by encouraging open and frank discussions
between the Board and legal counsel outside the presence of the adverse party; and
WHEREAS, each District Board member simultaneously serves on the governing
body of his or her member agency. Some District Board members also simultaneously
serve on the governing bodies of other agencies, as authorized by law; and
WHEREAS, on rare occasion, potential or pending litigation may involve another
public agency whose governing board includes one or more District Board members; and
WHEREAS, the District's interest in any potential or pending litigation could be
severely compromised if a member of the governing body of an adverse party were to
attend a District closed session and thereby obtain confidential attorney-client
communications regarding the case; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to protect the District's interest by prohibiting the
attendance at closed session of any Director who sits on the governing body of the
adverse party, unless the Director disqualifies himself or herself from any involvement in
the matter in his or her capacity as a member of the governing board of the adverse party;
OCSD 17-07-1
124M14.1
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation
District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. In the event that the District Board holds one or more closed sessions
to discuss potential or pending litigation with an adverse party, any Director who serves
on the governing board of the adverse party shall not attend the closed sessions unless
and until he or she makes the election described in Section 2.
Section 2. Any Director who serves on the governing board of an adverse party
with respect to potential or pending litigation may elect to disqualify himself or herself from
any involvement in the matter whatsoever in his or her capacity as a member of the
governing board of the adverse party. Without limiting the foregoing, any Director who
makes this election shall not, in his or her capacity as a member of the governing board
of the adverse party, vote on the matter, attend open or closed session on the matter,
discuss the matter with any officials or employees of the adverse party orally or in writing,
or attempt to influence the adverse party's actions relating to the matter.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 26, 2017
Gregory C. Sebourn, PLS
Board Chairman
ATTEST:
Kelly A. Lore, CMC
Clerk of the Board
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Bradley R. Hogin
General Counsel
Orange County Sanitation District
OCSD 17-07-2
124M14.1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, Kelly A. Lore, Clerk of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. OCSD 17-07 was passed and adopted
at a regular meeting of said Board on the 26th day of April 2017, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of
Orange County Sanitation District this 26th day of April 2017.
Kelly A. Lore, CIVIC
Clerk of the Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District
OCSD 17-07-3
124M14.1