HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-06-2017 Operations Committee Meeting Agenda Packet Item 09 Attachment - Final EIR.pdf Bay Bridge Pump Station and
Force Mains Replacement Project
(Project • ' S
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT . O .
FINAL
� ro
' •. . 2017
'o W�
e eg
0
l�M INF [NV�F
7 J.
I �
r -
e
♦`=,j
I
rt
Jaw
x _ Ir � •=ir 4 y q Mir
�=
-`
a7
ange County Sanitation District, "
Michael Bak eglntarnational
FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION AND
FORCE MAINS REPLACEMENT PROJECT
SCH NO. 2016111031
`,HVV SPNiIN M1
0
P
Ph �
Lead Agency:
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Contact: Mr. Kevin Hadden
Principal Staff Analyst
714.962.2411
Prepared by:
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500
Santa Ana, CA 92707
Contact: Mr. Alan Ashimine
949.472.3505
December 2017
JN 143698
This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources.
Emimnmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Fome Mains Replacement Project
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section1.0: Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1-1
Section2.0: Comments and Responses................................................................................................2-1
Section3.0: Errata....................................................................................................................................3-1
Section 4.0: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.............................................................4-1
Final .December 2017 i Table of Contents
Envi ronmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pmnp Station and ForceMains Replacement Project
This page intentionally left blank.
Final .December 2017 3i Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This page intentionally left blank.
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
1.0 INTRODUCTION
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Art Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines) Section
15088,the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD),as the lead agency,has evaluated the comments
received on the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Draft Environmental
Impact Report (DEIR).
The DEIR for the proposed Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (herein
referenced as the project) was distributed to responsible and trustee agencies, interested groups, and
organizations. The DEIR was made available for public review and comment for a period of 45 days.
The public review period for the DEIR (established by the CEQA Guidelines Section 15105)
commenced on June 21,2017 and ended August 4,2017.
The Final EIR(FEIR) consists of the following components:
. Section 1.0—Introduction
. Section 2.0—Responses to Comments
. Section 3.0—Errata
. Section 4.0—Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Due to its length,the text of the DEIR is not included with this document;however,it is included by
reference in this FEIR. None of the corrections or clarifications to the DEIR identified in this
document constitutes "significant new information" pursuant to Section 15088.5 of the CEQA
Guidelines. As a result,recirculation of the DEIR is not required.
Final .December 2017 1-1 Introduction
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
This page intentionally left blank.
Final .December 2017 1-2 Introduction
2.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS
This page intentionally left blank.
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
2.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS
2.1 CEQA REQUIREMENTS
Before approving a project, the Cakfomia EnvironmentalQuakty Ad(CEQA) requires the Lead Agency
to prepare and certify a Final Environmental Impact Report(FEIR).
In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15120 through 15132 and Section 15161, the Orange
County Sanitation District (OCSD) prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (SCH #2016111031). This
Responses to Comments section, combined with the DEIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program,and errata sheet comprise the FEIR
This Responses to Comments section includes all components required by CEQA Guidelines Section
15120 and is included in the FEIR.
2.2 PUBLIC REVIEW PROCESS - DRAFT EIR
The DEIR was circulated for review and comment to the public, agencies, and organizations. The
DEIR was also circulated to State agencies for review through the State Clearinghouse, Office of
Planning and Research. The 45-day public review period ran from June 21, 2017 to August 4, 2017.
Comments regarding the DEIR received in writing during the 45-day public review period from the
public,local,and State agencies have been incorporated into this section.
2.3 FINAL EIR
The FEIR allows the public and Lead Agency an opportunity to review revisions to the DEIR, the
responses to comments, and other components of the EIR, such as the Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program, before project approval. The FEIR serves as the environmental document to
support a decision on the proposed project.
After completing the FEIR, and before approving the project, the Lead Agency must make the
following three certifications as required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15090:
• That the FEIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA;
• That the FEIR was presented to the decision-making body of the Lead Agency, and that the
decision-making body reviewed and considered the information in the FEIR prior to
approving the project;and
• That the FEIR reflects the Lead Agency's independent judgment and analysis.
These certifications, the Findings of Fact, are included in a separate Findings document. Both the
FEIR and the Findings will be submitted to the Lead Agency for consideration of the proposed
project.
Final .December 2017 2-1 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
2.4 WRITTEN COMMENT LETTERS
AND RESPONSES
All written correspondence from those agencies or individuals commenting on the DEIR is
reproduced on the following pages. The individual comments on each letter have been consecutively
numbered for ease of reference. Following each comment letter are responses to each numbered
comment. A response is provided for each comment raising substantive environmental issues. Added
or modified text is underlined,while deleted text will have a serike-ear--•through the text,and is included
in a box,as the following example shows:
`Text from F.TR '
COMMENT LETTERS
A total of 14 comment letters were received by OCSD,as outlined below.
State Agencies
1. Scott Morgan, Director, State Clearinghouse, State of California Governor's Office of
Planning and Research,State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit,August 7, 2017.
2. Crayle Totton, B.S., M.A.,Ph.D., Associate Governmental Project Analyst, Native American
Heritage Commission,July 14,2017.
3. Johnson P. Abraham, Project Manager, Brownfields Restoration and School Evaluation
Branch, Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program - Cypress, Department of
Toxic Substances Control,July 11,2017.
4. Yatman Kwan,AICP,Branch Chief,Regional-IGR-Transit Planning,State of California
Department of Transportation District 12,August 4,2017.
Regional/Local Agencies
5. Patrick Alford,Planning Program Manager, City of Newport Beach,August 4,2017.
6. Richard Vuong,Manager,Planning Division,Orange County Public Works,August 2,2017.
7. Tamera Rivers,Management Analyst, Orange County Fire Authority,July 25,2017.
Interested Parties and Individuals
8. Allyson Presm,Partner,Palmo Investments,GP,June 22,2017.
9. Andrew Salas,Chairman, Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizhnation,July 18, 2017.
Final .December 2017 2-2 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
10. Dan Miller,Senior Vice President, Irvine Company,August 3,2017.
11.James Chuang, Senior Environmental Specialist, Southern California Gas Company, August
4, 2017.
12.John Erskine,Nossaman LLP,August 4,2017.
13. Patricia Martz,Ph.D.,President,California Cultural Resources Preservation Alliance,Inc.,July
8, 2017.
14. Rebecca Robles,United Coalition to Protect Panhe,July 5,2017.
Final .December 2017 2-3 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement project
This page intentionally left blank.
Final .December 2017 2-4 Responses to Comments
COMMENT LETTER 1
f vbLyh
Vie.�C�
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
♦
3 \"
Governor's Office of Planning and Research e
•a State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit
Edmund G. Brown Jr. Ken Alen
Governor Director
August 7,2017
Kevin Hadden
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92708-7018
Subject: Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project
SCH#- 2016111031
Dear Kevin Hadden:
The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Draft EIR to selected state agencies for review. On
the enclosed Document Details Report please note that the Clearinghouse has listed the state agencies that
reviewed your document. The review period closed on August 4,2017,and the comments from the
responding agency lies)is(are)enclosed. If this comment package is not in order,please notify the State
Clearinghouse immediately. Please refer to the project's ten-digit Stale Clearinghouse number in future
correspondence so that we may respond promptly.
Please note that Section 21104(c)of the California Public Resources Code states that:
"A responsible or other public agency shall only make substantive comments regarding those
activities involved in a project which are within an area of expertise of the agency or which are
required to be carried out or approved by the agency. Those comments shall be supported by T•T
specific documentation."
These comments are forwarded for use in preparing your final environmental document. Should you need
more information or clarification of the enclosed comments,we recommend that you contact the
commenting agency directly.
This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for
draft environmental documents,pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please contact the
State Clearinghouse at(916)445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review
process.
Sincerely,
Ztort Morgan
Director,Slate Clearinghouse
Enclosures
cc: Resources Agency
1400 TENTH STREET P.O.BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO.CALIFORNIA 95812-3044
TEL(9I5)445-0613 FAX(916)323-3018 www.opr.ca.gov
Document Details Report
State Clearinghouse Data Base
SCH# 2016111031
Project Title Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project
Lead Agency Orange County Sanitation District
Type EIR Dreg EIR
Description The proposed project would replace the Bay Bridge Pump Station and associated force mains.The
project would bring the pump station facility and force mains to current design and reliability standards
to ensure continuous service for the Newport Coast service area.The primary project components
consist of: 1)pump station improvements;2)Newport Bay Channel crossing force main improvements;
and 3)West Coast Hwy crossing force main improvements.
Lead Agency Contact
Name Kevin Harden
Agency Orange County Sanitation District
Phone 714-962-2411 Fax
email
Address 10844 Ellis Avenue
City Fountain Valley State CA Zip 92708-7018
Project Location
County Orange
City Newport Beach
Region
Lat/Long 33'37'00.58"N/117*54'03.7"W
Cross Streets East Coast Hwy and Bayside Or
Parcel No. 4410-132-60, 117-801-10
Township 6S Range 10W Section 26 Base SBM
Proximity to:
Highways 1
Airports
Railways
Waterways Newport Bay Channel
Schools Numerous
Land Use Bayside Village Boat Launch and Storage and Multi-Unit Residential/recreational and Marine
Commercial and Mixed Use-Water
Project Issues Agricultural Land;Air Quality;Archaeologic-Historic;Biological Resources;Coastal Zone;
Drainage/Absorption;Flood Plain/Flooding; Forest Land/Fire Hazard;Geologic/Seismic; Minerals;
Noise;Population/Housing Balance;Public Services;Recreation/Parks;Schools/Universities; Septic
System;Sewer Capacity;Soil Erosion/CompactlonlGrading; Solid Waste;Toxic/Hazardous;
TrafGCirculation;Vegetation;Water Quality;Water Supply;WeeandlRiparian;Wildlife;Growth
Inducing;Landless;Cumulative Effects; Other Issues;Aesthetic/Visual;Tribal Cultural Resources
Reviewing Resources Agency;California Coastal Commission; Department of Conservation; Department of Fish
Agencies and Wildlife, Region 5;Office of Historic Preservation;Department of Parks and Recreation;
Department of Water Resources;California Highway Patrol; Caltrans,District 12;Regional Water
Quality Control Board,Region 8; Department of Toxic Substances Control;State Water Resources
Control Board,Division of Water Quality;Air Resources Board,Major Industrial Projects; Native
American Heritage Commission;State Lands Commission
Date Received 0 6/2112 0 1 7 Start of Review 06/21/2017 EndofReview 08/04/2017
Note: Blanks in data fields result from insufficient information provided by lead agency.
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 1
Scott Morgan,Director,State Clearinghouse
State of California Governor's Office of Planning and Research,State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit
August 7,2017
1-1 This letter acknowledges that the State Clearinghouse submitted the DEIR to selected State
agencies for review and that the DEIR review period closed on August 4,2017. The comment
states that the Lead Agency (OCSD) complied with the public review requirements for draft
environmental documents pursuant to CEQA. As such,no further response is necessary.
1-2 This comment includes the State Clearinghouse Document Details Report and does not
address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. It should be noted that
attached to this letter from the State Clearinghouse was correspondence related to the project
from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and California Department of
Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). These comment letters from the NAHC and DTSC are
included as Response to Comment Letter No. 2 and No. 3,below.
Final .December 2017 2-7 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement project
This page intentionally left blank.
Final .December 2017 2-8 Responses to Comments
COMMENT LETTER 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Etlmuntl G. BTown-JL,CxaYamOf
NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION
Environmental and Cultural capanment
1550 Harbor Blvd.Suite too
Weal Sacramento,CA 95691
Paone(916)373-3710
July 14,2017
Kevin Hadden
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92706
sent via e-mail:khaddenQocsd.mm
Re: SCH#2016111031, Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project, Community of Newport Beach;
Orange County, California
Dear Mr. Hadden:
The Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC)has reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Report prepared for the
project referenced above. The review included the Introduction and Project Description,and the Environmental Analysis,
section 5.4 Cultural Resources,and section 5.12 Tribal Cultural Resources prepared by Duke CRM and Michael Baker 2.1
International for the Orange County Sanitation District. We have the following concerns:
1. There are no mitigation measures specifically addressing Tribal Cultural Resources separately. Mitigation measures
must take Tribal Cultural Resources Into consideration as required under AB-52, with or without consultation
occurring. Mitigation language for archaeological resources is not always appropriate for or similar to 2.2
measures specifically for handling Tribal Cultural Resources.For sample mitigation measures, please refer to the
California Natural Resources Agency (2016) "Final Text for tribal cultural resources update to Appendix G:
Environmental Checklist Form,"httu7/a ources ca go /ceca/docs/ab52/Clean4i al-AB-52-Aoo-G-text-Submitted odf
The California Environmental Ouality Act (CEOA)', specifically Public Resources Code section 21084.1, states that a project
that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource is a project that may have a significant
effect on the environment 2 It there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before a lead agency,that a project may
have a significant effect an the environment, an environmental impact report (EIR) shall be prepared.a In order to determine
whether a project will cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource,a lead agency will need to
determine whether there are historical resources with the area of project effect(APE).
CEOA was amended in 2014 by Assembly Bill 52. (AB 52).4 AB 52 applies to any project for which a notice of preparation
or a notice of negative declaration or mltig6ared negative declaration is filed on or after July 1, 2015. AS 52 created a
separate category for"tribal cultural resources" ,that now includes"a project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environments Public 2_3
agencies shall, when feasible, avoid damaging effects to any tribal cultural resource Your project may also be subject to
Senate BIII 18(SB 18)(Burton, Chapter 905, Statutes of 2004),Government Code 65352.3. if it also involves the adoption of or
amendment to a general plan or a specific plan, or the designation or proposed designation of open space. Both SB 18 and
AB 52 have tribal consultation requirements. Additionally, If your project is also subject to the federal National Environmental
Policy Act (42 U.S.C. § 4321 at seq.) (NEPA), the tribal consultation requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 19666 may also apply.
Consult your legal counsel about compliance with AS 52 and SS 18 as well as compliance with any other applicable
laws.
Agencies should be aware that AS 52 does not preclude agencies from initiating tribal consultation with tribes that are
traditionally and culturally affiliated with their jurisdictions before the timeframes provided in AS 52.For that reason, we urge you
to continue to request Native American Tribal Consultation Lists and Sacred Lands File searches from the NAHC. The request
forms can be found online at: http>_/nahc.gg aov/resources/forms/. Additional information regarding AS 52 can be found online
'Pub.Resources Code if 21WO et Bea.
'Pub.Rewurcfi8 Code$21084.1:Cal,Cade Reps.,1B.14,§15064.5(b);CEGA Guidelines Section 15064s(b)
'Pub.Resources Cade$21M(d);CBI.Code Reps,fit,14.If 15064 sWd.(a)(1);CEGA Guidelines§15054 fa)(1)
'Government Cade 6MMA
`Pub.Resources Cod.$21074
°Pam.ResWrces Cade§21084.2
'Pub.Resources Cade§21084.3(a)
°154 U SA.3110101,36 C.F.R.§a00 at sea.
at htto,//nahc ca aovAwo ordenVupioadgQQ15/10/AM2T balCo s ltation CalEPAPDF odi, entitled 'Tribal Consultation Under
AS 52: Requirements and Best Practices".
The NAHC recommends lead agencies consult with all California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally
affiliated with the geographic area of your proposed project as early as possible in order to avoid inadvertent discoveries of
Native American human remains and best protect tribal cultural resources. 2-3
A brief summary of Portion of AB 52 and SB 18 as well as the NAHC's recommendations for conducting cultural resources
assessments is also attached.
Please contact me at gayle.totton@nahc.ca.gov or call(916)373-3710 8 you have any questions.
Sincerely,
yl7.tton,�, MAh.D
sociate Governmental Project Analyst
Attachment
cc: State Clearinghouse
2
Pertinent StMutory Informatlon:
Under AB 52:
As 52 has added to CEQA the additional requirements listed below,along with many other requirements:
Within fourteen(14)days of determining that an application for a project is complete or of a decision by a public agency to
undertake a project,a lead agency shall provide formal notification to a designated contact of,or tribal representative of,
traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice.
A lead agency shall begin the consultation process within 30 days of receiving a request for consultation from a California
Native American trbe that Is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project.'and prior to
the rates"of a negative declaration,mitigated negative declaration or environmental Impact report.For purposes of AB
52,"consultafion shall have the same meaning as provided in Gov.Code§85352.4(SB 18).'o
The following topics of consultation,if a tribe requests to discuss them,are mandatory topics of consultation:
a. Afternativesto the project.
It. Recommended mitgation measures.
c. Significant effects.'
1. The following topics are discretionary topics of consultation:
a. Type of environmental review necessary.
It. Significance of the tribal cultural resources.
c. Significance of the project's impacts on tribal cultural resources.
If necessary,F.roject alternatives or appropriate measures for preservation or mitigation that the tribe may recommend to the
lead agency. 2
With some exceptions,any information,including but not limited to,the location,description,and use of tribal cultural resources
submitted by a California Native American tribe during the environmental review process shall not be Included In the
environmental document or otherwise disclosed by the lead agency or any other public agency to the public,
consistent with Government Code sections 6254(r)and 6254.10. Any Informatlon submitted by a California Native
American tribe during the consultation or environmental review process shall be published in a confidential appendix to the
environmental document unless the tribe that provided the information consents,in writing,to the disclosure of some or all of the
Information to the public."
If a project may have a significant impact on a tribal cultural resource,the lead agency's environmental document shall
discuss both of the following:
a. Whether the proposed project has a signllloant Impact on an identified tribal cultural resource.
b. Whether feasible alternatives or mitigation measures,including those measures that may be agreed to pursuant to
Public Resources Code section 21082.3,subdivision(a),avoid or substantially lessen the impact on the identffied
tribal cultural resource.14
Consultation with a tribe shall be considered concluded when either of the following occurs:
a. The parties agree to measures to mitigate or avoid a significant effect, If a significant effect exists,on a tribal
cultural resource;or
b. A party, acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, concludes that mutual agreement cannot be reached.'s
Any mitigation measures agreed upon in the consultation conducted pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.2
shall be recommended for Inclusion in the environmental document and In an adopted mitigation monitoring and
reporting program,if determined to avoid or lessen the im�ract pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21082.3,
subdivision(b), paragraph 2,and shall be fully enforceable. a
If mitigation measures recommended by the staff of the lead agency as a result of the consultation process are not included in
the environmental document or I there are no agreed upon mitigation measures at the conclusion of consultation,or b
con uitation does not occur,and if substantial evidence demonstrates that a project will cause a signfficam effect to a tribal
cultural resource,the lead agency shall consider feasible mitigation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21084.3
(b)'r
An environmental impact report may not be certified,nor may a mitigated negative declaration or a negative declaration be
adopted unless one of the following occurs:
a. The consultation process between the tribes and the lead agency has occurred as provided in Public Resources
Code sections 21080.3.1 and 21080.3.2 and concluded pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.2.
b. The tribe that requested consultation failed to provide comments to the lead agency or otherwise failed to engage
in the consultation process.
'Pub.Resuuces Cade§21080.3.1,sul,da(d)and(a)
' Pub.RBsourox,Cade$210e0.3.1(b)
Pub Reeaurme Coils$210e0.32(Q
11 Pub.Resourcae Cods§21 W0.3.2(a)
Pub.Rwwrws Cade It 21092.3(cffl)
Pub.nusarcaa Cade§21082.0(b)
1°Pub,Resouroea Cade§21 050.3.2(b)
16 Pub.Resources Code§21062.3(a)
"Pub.Reswrme Cotle$210a2.3(e)
3
c. The lead agency provided notice of the project to the tribe in compliance with Public Resources Code section
21080.3.1 (d)and the tribe failed to request consultation within 30 days.1e
This process should be documented in the Tribal Cultural Resources section of your environmental document.
Under SS 18:
Government Code§65352.3(a) (1)requires consultation with Native Americans on general plan proposals for the purposes of
"preserving or mitigating impacts to places,features,and objects described§5097.9 and§5091.993 of the Public Resources
Code that are located within the city or county's jurisdiction. Government Code§65560(a),(b),and(c)provides for
consultation with Native American tribes on the open-space element of a county or city general plan for the purposes of
protecting places,features, and objects described in Sections 5097.9 and 5097.993 of the Public Resources Code.
• SIB 18 applies to local governments and requires them to contact,provide notice to, refer plans to,and consult with tribes
prior to the adoption or amendment of a general plan or a specific plan,or the designation of open space. Local
governments should consult the Governor's Office of Planning and Research's"Tribal Consultation Guidelines;which can
be found online at:http%#www_,opr.ca.gov/dms/09 14 OS Updated Guidelines-922.pdf
• Irillial_Consultation: If a local government considers a proposal to adopt or amend a general plan or a specific plan,or to
designate open space It is required to contact the appropriate tribes identified by the NAHC by requesting a"Tribal
Consultation List"If a tribe,once contacted, requests consultation the local government must consult with the tribe on the
plan proposal. A tribe has 90 days from the date of recelpt of notification to request consultation unless a shorter
tlmeframe has been agreed to by the trlbe.19
• There's no Statutory Time Limit on Tribal Consultation under the law.
• Confidential : Consistent with the guidelines developed and adopted by the Office of Planning and Research,''the city or
county shall protect the confidentiality of the information concerning the specific identity,location,character,and use of
places,features and objects described in Public Resources Code sections 5097.9 and 5097.993 that are within the city's or
county's jurisdiction.21
• Conclusion Tribal Consultation: Consultation should be concluded at the point in which: 2-4
o The parties to the consultation come to a mutual agreement concerning the appropriate measures for preservation
or mitigation;or
o Either the local government or the tribe,acting in good faith and after reasonable effort,concludes that mutual
agreement cannot be reached concerning the appropriate measures of preservation or mltigatioff.2a
NAHC Recommendations for Cultural Resources Assessments:
• Contact the NAHC for:
o A Sacred Lands File search. Remember that tribes do not always record their sacred sites in the Sacred Lands
File,nor are they required to do so. A Sacred Lands File search is not a substitute for consultation with tribes that
are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project's APE.
o A Native American Tribal Contact List of appropriate tribes for consultation concerning the project site and to assist
in planning for avoidance,preservation in place,or,falling both,mitigation measures.
• The request form can be found at htto://nahc.caocrWresourcesttorni
• Contact the appropriate regional California Historical Research Information System(CHRIS)Center
(htto//ohp parks ca gov/ Page ii 0681 for an archaeological records search. The records search will determine:
o If part or the entire APE has been previously surveyed for cultural resources.
o If any known cultural resources have been already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE.
o If the probability is low,moderate,or high that cultural resources are located in the APE.
o If a survey is required to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present.
• If an archaeological Inventory survey is required,the final stage is the preparation of a professional report detailing the
findings and recommendations of the records search and field survey.
o The final report containing site forms,site significance,and mitigation measures should be submitted Immediately
to the planning department. All information regarding she locations, Native American human remains,and
associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum and not be made available for public
disclosure.
o The final written report should be submitted within 3 months after work has been completed to the appropriate
regional CHRIS center.
1°Pub.resources Cada§21062.3 in
(Gov.Cotle if 65352.3(a)(20.
1O W nnaot to Gov.Coce section 650,10.2,
(Gov.Cade if 653523 its),
a(tribal Consu6aeon Guidelines,Governor's Mice of Planning and Research(2(05)at p.18).
4
Examples of Mitigation Measures That May Be Considered to Avoid or Minimize Significant Adverse Lmpws to Trl¢M
Cultural Resources:
o Avoidance and preservation of the resources in place,Including,but not limited to:
• Planning and construction to avoid the resources and protect the cultural and natural context.
• Planning greenspace,parks, or other open space,to incorporate the resources with culturally appropriate
protection and management criteria.
o Treating the resource with culturally appropriate dignity,taking into account the tribal cultural values and meaning
of the resource,including,but not limited to,the following:
• Protecting the cultural character and Integrity of the resource.
• Protecting the traditional use of the resource.
Protecting the confidentiality of the resource.
o Permanent conservation easements or other interests in real property,with culturally appropriate management
criteria for the purposes of preserving or utilizing the resources or places.
o Please note that a federally recognized California Native American tribe or a non-federally recognized California
Native American tribe that is on the contact list maintained by the NAHC to protect a California prehistoric,
archaeological,cultural, spiritual,or ceremonial place may acquire and hold conservation easements if the 2-4conservation easement is voluntarily conveyed.
o Please note that 4 is the policy of the state that Native American remains and associated grave artifacts shall be
mpatriated.24
The lack of surface evidence of archaeological resources(including tribal cultural resources)does not preclude their subsurface
existence.
o Lead agencies should Include in their mitigation and monitoring moorting progmm oleo provisions for the
identification and evaluation of inadvertently discovered archaeological resource— s�In areas of Itlemifiad
archaeological sensitivity,a certified archaeologist and a culturally affiliated Native American with knowledge of
cultural resources should monitor all ground-daluming activities.
o Lead agencies should Include in their mitigation and monitoring repo In Dngrem oleos orovis'ons ignite
gfaposition of recovered cultural items that are not burial associated in consultation with culturally affiliated Native
Americans.
o L9etl eaendes shoulA inclutlejn their mitigation and monitoring repoNng oroar@Lri plans nrovielp0 f r t e
treatment end dispos6ion of inadvertenly discovered Native American human remains. Health and Safety Code
section 7050.5, Public Resources Cade section 5097.98,and Cal.Code Regs.,Of. 14,section 15064.5,
subdivisions(d)and(a)(CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5,subds.(d)and(a))address the processes to be
followed in the event of an Inadvertent discovery of any Native American human remains and associated grave
goods in a location other than a dedicated cemetery.
n(CN.Cale 5 at"(c)).
a(Pub.Remurcee Code$5097.01).
® real.Code Reps.,tll.14,seaon 15094S(lt(CEQA Rultlelhles sad.15064.5(h).
5
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 2
Gayle Totton,B.S.,M.A.,Ph.D.,Associate Governmental Project Analyst
Native American Heritage Commission
July 14,2017
2-1 This is an introductory comment oudining the items reviewed by the Native American
Heritage Commission (NAHC), and does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an
environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary.
2-2 The comment indicates that there are no mitigation measures specifically addressing Tribal
Cultural Resources (TCRs). Based on Section 5.12, Tribal Cultural Rerourrer of the DEIR,
based on the cultural resources investigation, the findings of the records search and field
survey,and the Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) consultation process,OCSD has determined that no
TCRs are known to exist on the project site. However, Mitigation Measure CULA was
included to minimize impacts in the event unknown TCRs are discovered during on-site
ground disturbing activities. Mitigation Measure CUL-1 includes provisions related to the
identification of TCRs and protocol to be followed in the event TCRs are discovered. As
such,Mitigation Measure CUE 1 was determined to be sufficient to minimize impacts in this
regard to a less than significant level (minor editorial revisions to CUL-1 are noted below to
provide clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process).
Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure CUL-1 on DEIR page 5.4-16 have been
included to provide additional monitoring and reporting clarification. Mitigation Measure CUL-
1 has been revised as follows:
CUL,1 Prior to ground-disturbing activities, a qualified archaeologist shall provide an
Archaeological Monitoring Protocol Plan for the project. The archaeologist shall
provide training to a Contractor's Representative regarding the Archaeological
Monitoring Protocol Plan and the identification of archaeological resources. The
training shall be open to Native American tribal representative(s), to assist the
Contractor's Representative in identifying potential tribal cultural resources. The
plan shall identify procedures for the event that potential resources are discovered
by the Construction Contractor.
If evidence of potential subsurface archaeological resources is found during site
disturbance/excavation activities,these activities shall cease within 50 feet of that
area and the construction contractor shall contact the Orange County Sanitation
District fir. Construction activities shall be allowed to continue
in other areas of the site. The Resident Engineer shall then retain a qualified
archaeologist to evaluate the discovery prior to resuming grading/construction
activities in the immediate vicinity of the find. If warranted,the archaeologist shall
collect the resource, and prepare a test-level report describing the results of the
investigation. The test-level report shall evaluate the site including discussion of
the significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of the resource), final
mitigation recommendations,and cost estimates.
Final .December 2017 2-14 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
If the archaeologist determines that the find is prehistoric or includes Native
American materials, affiliated Native American groups shall be invited to
contribute to the assessment and recovery of the resource, as applicable. The
archaeologist and any applicable Native American contacts shall collect the
resource and prepare a test-level report describing the results of the investigation.
The test-level report shall evaluate the site including discussion of significance
(depth, nature, condition, and extent of the resources), final mitigation
recommendations,and cost estimates.
Salvage operation requirements pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA
Guidelines shall be followed. Work within the area of discovery shall resume only
after the resource has been appropriately inventoried,documented,and recovered,
as applicable.
2-3 This comment discusses CEQA requirements pertaining to historical resources, AB 52, and
Senate Bill 18 (SB 18), as well as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) guidelines
pertaining to tribal consultation requirements. The project is not subject to the requirements
of SB 18 or NEPA. As noted within Section 5.12, of the DEIR, OCSD fully complied with
the requirements of AB 52 during preparation of the DEIR.
2-4 This comment provides a brief summary of portions of AB 52 and SB 18 and NAHC's
recommendation for conducting cultural resources assessments, and does not address the
DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue.
Final .December 2017 2-15 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
This page intentionally left blank.
Final .December 2017 2-16 Responses to Comments
— COMMENT LETTER 3
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Barbara A. Lee, Director
Matthew Rodriquez 5796 Corporate Avenue Edmund G.Brown A
Secretary for Governor
Environmental Protection Cypress, California 90630
July 11, 2017
Mr. Kevin Hadden
Principal Staff Analyst
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
khadden(Docsd.com & CEQA(cbocsd.om
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR BAY BRIDGE PUMP
STATION AND FORCE MAINS REPLACEMENT PROJECT (SCH#2016111031)
Dear Mr. Hadden:
The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has reviewed the subject EIR.
The following project description is stated in the EIR: "Locally, the project site includes
sewer pump station improvements located within a property located at 300 East
Coast Highway. The project also includes sewer force main improvements that would
extend from the proposed pump station, proceed westerly beneath the Newport Bay 3-1
Channel to a disturbed area within the southern portion of Castaways Park, and extend
south beneath West Coast Highway to connect to the existing Orange County
Sanitation District (OCSD) force main system; refer to Exhibit 3-2, Site Vicinity."
Based on the review of the submitted document DTSC has the following comments:
1. The EIR states, "As noted in Section 5.7.1. Existing Environmental Setting,
elevated levels of DDT/DDE pesticide contamination have been reported in the
Newport Bay Channel. However, these contaminates are anticipated to be
present in topsoils along the channel as a result of deposition. As such, proposed 3=
HDD/microtunneling force main crossing beneath the Newport Bay Channel
would occur in deeper soils and is not anticipated to involve these contaminated
topsoils." However, the EIR states, 'The proposed pump station site is entirely
disturbed, and is currently occupied by RV storage facilities and a driveway
providing access to the facility." DTSC recommends investigation and mitigation,
as necessary, to address potential impact to human health and environment from
residual pesticides.
0 Printed on Recycled Paper
Mr. Kevin Hadden
July 11, 2017
Page 2
2. The EIR further states a number of facilities in the vicinity of the project site that
have been known to handle, store, and/or transport hazardous materials,
especially gasoline. DTSC is unable to evaluate whether vapor sampling and/or
potential vapor intrusion risk was adequately addressed due to lack of relevant 3-3
detailed information in the EIR. DTSC recommends soil gas sampling and vapor
intrusion risk evaluation on sites with releases of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs).
3. If Pump Station Electrical Room or Pump Station Generator Facility currently
exist on the project site, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contamination related to
transformers may be a possibility. DTSC recommends evaluation, proper 3-4
investigation and mitigation, if necessary, on onsite areas with current or historic
PCB-containing transformers.
4. If soil contamination is suspected or observed in the project area, then excavated
soil should be sampled prior to export/disposal. If the soil is contaminated, it
should be disposed of properly in accordance with all applicable and relevant 3-5
laws and regulations. In addition, if the project proposes to import soil to backfill
the excavated areas, proper evaluation and/or sampling should be conducted to
make sure that the imported soil is free of contamination.
5. If during construction/demolition of the project, soil and/or groundwater
contamination is suspected, construction/demolition in the area should cease and
appropriate health and safety procedures should be implemented. If it is 3-6
determined that contaminated soil and/or groundwater exist, the EIR should
identify how any required investigation and/or remediation will be conducted, and
the appropriate government agency to provide regulatory oversight.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at(714) 484-5380 or
email at Johnson.Abraham dtsc.ca. ov. 3-7
Sincerely,
V Joh son P. Abraham
9y+ Project Manager
a Brownfields Restoration and School Evaluation Branch
Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program - Cypress
kI/shrla
cc: See next page.
Mr. Kevin Hadden
July 11, 2017
Page 3
cc: Governor's Office of Planning and Research (via e-mail)
State Clearinghouse
P.O. Box 3044
Sacramento, California 95812-3044
State.cleari nghouseCctopr.ca.gov
Mr. Dave Kereazis (via e-mail)
Office of Planning & Environmental Analysis
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Dave.Kereazis(cadtsc.ca.pov
Mr. Shahir Haddad, Chief(via e-mail)
Schools Evaluation and Brownfields Cleanup
Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program - Cypress
Shahir.Haddad(&dtsc.ca.gov
CEQA# 2016111031
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 3
Johnson P. Abraham, Project Manager, Brownfields Restoration and School Evaluation Branch,
Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program - Cypress
Department of Toxic Substances Control
July 11,2017
3-1 This is an introductory comment with a brief project description. This comment does not
address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such,no further response
is necessary.
3-2 The commenter suggests that the topsoil at the proposed pump station site could have residual
pesticides, since the DEIR identifies it along the channel. Based on the Back Bay Landing
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), sediment within the bay reported elevated
levels of dichlorodiphenyl trichloroethane (DDT) and dichlorodiphenyl dichloroethylene
(DDE) pesticide contamination. This material is anticipated to come from upstream sources
that have resulted in mnoff and transport of sediment to the project site through the Newport
Bay Channel. The proposed pump station site is located outside of the channel's ordinary
high water mark and is not anticipated to involve tins channel deposit material. Further, the
pump station site was not historically developed with agricultural or other uses associated with
the potential application of DDT/DDE-related pesticides. Thus,the pesticide contamination
is limited to the Newport Bay Channel and not the pump station site.
3-3 This comment indicated that there is potential for release of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) and vapor encroachment at the project site due to reported contamination in the
project vicinity. However, the DEIR Section 5.7, Hazards and Hazardous Materials. does
consider potential off site sources to impact soil gas at the project site. The DEIR identifies
the following off-site facilities, which have been known to handle, store, and/or transport
hazardous materials:
• Mobil#18HGK.301 CoastHighwav The facility adjoins the project site to the southeast
across East Coast Highway. This off-site property released gasoline to the
groundwater. However, this facility received case closure by the Regional Water
Quality Control Board on July 28,2005. Further,the Back Bay Landing Phase I ESA
indicated that groundwater direction was to the west-southwest (away from the
proposed pump station site). Groundwater contamination remained at the site upon
receiving case closure, including methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) at 224 parts per
million (ppm). However, the plume was reported to be stable and limited to the area
beneath the facility and a portion of Bayside Drive,to the south of East Coast Highway
(which is greater than 200 feet from the proposed pump station). According to the
State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB's) online database (GeoTtacker),
confirmation soil borings and sampling were conducted in 2003 and (according to the
assessment results) concentrations of contamination in the soil were not present that
would warrant a vapor hazard survey. Thus, this off site facility is not anticipated to
present a vapor encroachment concern.
Final .December 2017 2-20 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
• N sort Beach Carr LLC 445 Eart Coast The facility is located approximately
380 feet to the southeast of the project site. This off-site property released gasoline to
the groundwater. The Back Bay Landing Phase I ESA indicated that groundwater
direction was to the southwest (cross gradient from the proposed pump station site)
and that contaminant concentrations at the facility are low. According to the
GeoTracker database, a Plume Time Travel report (prepared on October 20, 2005, and
updated on September 1, 2006 and January 10, 2008) estimated the plume to be
approximately 100 feet long by 20 feet wide. The model demonstrated a maximum
Plume distance of 100 to 150 feet from the source area by the year 2012,and predicted
that the contamination migration would not extend offsite. This facility received case
closure by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) on November 22,
2010. With the project site more than 380 feet away and assuming that vapor does
not typically travel further than 100 feet from the edge-of-plume, this off site release
has not resulted in a vapor encroachment concern to the proposed pump station site.
• FormerARCO Semite Station Site, 200 Coast Hlvhwav: The facility is situated off site to
the west of the project site (at 200 West Coast Highway). This off-site property
released gasoline to the groundwater. According to the GeoTracker database,this site
achieved case closure by the RWQCB on May 5,1998. Based on the Back Bay Landing
Phase I ESA historical aerials, the facility is located at the northwest comer of West
Coast Highway and Dover Drive. Given the distance of the facility from the proposed
pump station site (greater than 1,500 feet cross-gradient), this off-site release has not
resulted in a vapor encroachment concern to the proposed pump station site.
• Shell Oil (Former). 990 Coast kbebaa¢ The facility is located approximately 0.47-mile
southeast of the project site. Based on the distance of this facility to the proposed
pump station site (greater than 0.45 mile), this offsite release has not resulted in a
vapor encroachment concern to the proposed pump station site.
3-4 This comment indicates a possibility of polycblorinated biphenyl(PCB) contamination due to
the presence of on-site transformers. Based on the Back Bay Landing Phase I ESA,PCB was
not observed on, or around, the project site, including the existing pump station facility.
Several dry transformers, free of internal cooling fluids, were observed on-site and had no
indications of leaks or spills. PCB-containing equipment is not anticipated with regard to the
existing pump station facility.
3-5 This comment discusses the proper sampling and disposal of contaminated soil. No soil
import/export is proposed as part of the grading activities for the pump station site. Proposed
drilling activities would involve channel materials. The DEIR Mitigation Measures I-IAZ-3
and HAZ-4 are recommended to reduce impacts regarding potential contaminated channel
materials prior to disposal. Thus,as concluded in the DEIR,impacts regarding contaminated
soils as a result of soil import/export would be reduced to less than significant levels with
implementation of the recommended mitigation.
3-6 As discussed on DEIR page 5.7-14, site disturbance and demolition activities could expose
construction workers to a variety of unknown hazardous materials. However, Mitigation
Measure HAZ-4 would reduce potential impacts from unknown hazardous materials that
Final .December 2017 2-21 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
could result in accidental conditions at the project site. If unknown wastes or suspect materials
are discovered during construction by the contractor, which he/she believes may involve
hazardous wastes/materials, the contractor would be required to complete the following
(Mitigation Measure HAZ-4):
• Immediately stop work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant,removing workers
and the public from the area;
• Notify the Orange County Sanitation District Director of Engineering;
• Secure the areas as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District Director of
Engineering;and
• Notify the Orange County Health Care Agency's Hazardous Waste/Materials
Coordinator.
3-7 This comment is a closing statement providing contact information for questions. This
comment does not address the DEIWs adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such,
no further response is necessary.
Final .December 2017 2-22 Responses to Comments
COMMENT LETTER 4
a smx
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICF 12
1750 FAST FOURTH STREET,SUITE 100
SANTAANA,CA 92705 Making Coakrvallon
PHONE (657)329-6267 aCa6]o Way ofUfe.
PAX (657)328-6510
TrY 711
vmew.dnLmwv
August 4,2017
Mr. Kevin Hadden File: IGR/CEQA
Orange County Sanitation District SCH#: 2016111031
10844 Ellis Avenue 12-ORA-2017-00621
Fountain Valley, CA f92708 SR 1
Dear Mr.Hadden,
Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation(Caltrans)in the review of
the Draft Environmental Impact Report(DEER)for the proposed Bay Bridge Pump Station and
Force Mains Replacement Project.The mission of Caltrans is to provide a safe,sustainable,
integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability.
The project consists of upgrading the Bay Bridge Pump station,Newport Bay Channel,and West 44
Coast Highway crossing force main improvements to design and reliability standards.The
project is located between Dover Drive and Bayside Drive in the City of Newport Beach and in
proximity of Caltrans Right-of-Way (ROW)on State Route 1 (SR 1). Caltrans is a responsible
agency and has the following comments:
National Pollutant Dsscharee Elimination System/Stormwater
1. Section 3 of the DEIR states that a Caltrans Encroachment Permit will be required for
work that encroaches or discharges onto State right of way.A Waster Quality
Management Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required for Caltrans 4-2
review prior to encroachment permit approval. For specific details for Encroachment
Permits procedure,please refer to the Caltrans' Encroachment Permits Manual at:
htip://www.dot.ca.opy/hg/traffops/developwnbgmits/
2. Due to the close proximity of the project to the Newport Channel, a separate dewatering
permit may be needed from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Groundwater extraction and similar waste discharges from construction,remediation, and 4-3
permanent groundwater extraction projects to surface waters are regulated under the
general permit, Order No. R8-2007-0041,NPDES No.CAG918002, as amended by
Order No. R8-2009-0045.
3. Please be advised that Caltrans Encroachment Permit prohibits the discharge of
groundwater onto State facilities. 4-4
"Provide a.wfe,slulaU ble,Wegrakda efficknl&a Mnon ryMem
to enkmlce Calfmb' ec.Ma liv bdd,"
Orange County Sanitation District
August 4,2017
Page 2
Please continue to coordinate with Caltrans for any future developments that could potentially
impact State transportation facilities. If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact 45
Maryam Molavi at(657)328-6280 or maryAm.molavi(&dot.Mom.
Sincerely,
Yatm Kwan,AICP
Branch hief,Regional-IGR-Transit Planning
District
"Prov/deaagfi,avalalnable.bMgeared and affckb�Pa�bu^^'1'°t°^I
ro enhance Ca1�b S ecaromy andllvabiliry"
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 4
Yatmm Kwan,AICP,Branch Chief,Regional-IGR-Transit Planning
State of California Department of Transportation District 12
August 4,2017
4-1 This is an introductory comment with a brief project description. This comment does not
address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such,no further response
is necessary.
4-2 This comment acknowledges the inclusion of the required Caltrans Encroachment Permit in
the DEIR. The commenter states that a Water Quality Management Plan and Stornawater
Pollution Prevention Plan is required for Caltrans review prior to Encroachment Permit
approval and provides a link to the Caltrans'Encroachment Permits Manual for more details
regarding Encroachment Permits procedures. OCSD would adhere to the Caltrans
Encroachment Permit approval requirements. This comment does not address the DEIR's
adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No further response is necessary.
4-3 This comment discusses the potential requirement of a separate dewatering permit due to the
close proximity of the project to the Newport Channel. The project requires a General
Construction Permit through the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board as required
under National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm
Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order No.
2009-0009-DWQ [as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012-006-DWQ,NPDES Number
CAS000002). Section 5.7,Haaardr and Haxardoxs Matenak,page 5.7-13 of the DEIR discusses
potential impacts related to dewatering. As stated in the DEIR, the General Construction
Permit would ensure that any harmful pollutants or hazardous materials contained within the
Newport Bay Channel would be properly handled and disposed of to prevent unsafe exposure
to construction workers. Thus, compliance with General Construction Permit would reduce
a potential dewatering impact to a less than significant level.
4-4 This comment states that the Caltrans Encroachment Permit prohibits the discharge of
groundwater onto State facilities. The Caltrans Encroachment Permit process would ensure
that all permit approval requirements are met. This comment does not address the DEIR's
adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No further response is necessary.
4-5 This comment is a dosing statement requesting continued coordination with Caltrans for
future developments that could impact State transportation facilities and provides contact
information for questions. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve
an environmental issue. Thus,no further response is necessary.
Final .December 2017 2-25 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
This page intentionally left blank.
Final .December 2017 2-26 Responses to Comments
COMMENT LETTER S
CITY OF r BEACH
PORT 20 a�,c Center or.
0 Newport Beach,Califomia 92660
�(fI 949644.3200
n
I" f n ewportbeachca.gm/communiryde lopment
u r
eet
��t2FoaN�P
August 4, 2017
Via Electronic& Regular Mail
khadden(c)ocsd.com
Kevin Hadden, Principal Staff Analyst
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Re: Comments on Public Review Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Bay Bridge
Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project
Dear Mr. Hadden,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Public Review Draft Environmental Impact
Report for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project (the
The City of Newport Beach ("City") submits the following comments:
1. Project Description
a. The project description does not include the gravity sewer construction on
East Coast Highway adjacent to the Balboa Marina West property. This
construction would significantly impact traffic Flow on Coast Highway and 5-2
could necessitate nighttime work, thus resulting in noise impacts to adjacent
residences. The City does not support this project component due these
impacts. Relocation of this construction to the south and outside of the
Coast Highway right-of-way would significantly reduce these potential
impacts.
2. Mitigation Measures
a. AES-2: Revise Mitigation Measure language to accurately reflect approval
process. As currently written, it states that the pump station plans shall be 5-3
submitted to City for review, but approval is required by OCSD Director in
consideration of comments received from City. However, the pump station
is located in the Back Bay Landing Planned Community Zoning District,
Community Development Department
2
which requires review and approval of Site Development Review permit by S 3
the City's Planning Commission.
b. AES-4: Lighting Plan will require review and approval by the City
through the required Site Development Review permit. 5-4
c. N-1: Revise Mitigation Measure language "City" instead of"Town". 5-5
d. TRA-1: The Construction Management Plan will also require review and
approval by Caltrans for closures and impacts to their jurisdictional
roadways and by the City Public Works Department for road closures, 5-0
staging, and impacts to City roadways. The Construction Management Plan
needs to ensure bike trails remain open during construction or re-routed to
ensure connectivity.
3. Page 2-8, the reference to Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development
Plan (PCDP) requires correction to the most current version (November 22, 2016)
adopted and included with the City's certified Local Coastal Program (LCP)
Implementation Plan. The Back Bay Landing PCDP included in the LCP is similar 5-7
to the original version adopted by the City on February 25, 2014; however, there
are slight changes, including the elimination of the 65-foot public view tower. Any
reference to the PCDP should be the November 22, 2016 version.
4. Page 5.1-12. the building height limitation referenced as subsection b) describes
a 65-foot height limit for a public view tower; however, that height limit allowance
was eliminated from the final Back Bay Landing PCDP version adopted by the City 5-8
as part of the LCP on November 22, 2016. Please revise height limit references to
match the November 22, 2016 adopted version.
5. Page 5.1-13, the Architectural Theme Design Guidelines referenced is from the
old PCDP version and has been revised as part of the final November 22, 2016 5-9
adopted version. Please use the most current version.
Lower Castaways
Lower Castaways is a 4-acre open space area owned by the City located at the northeast
corner of West Coast Highway and Dover Drive. This site will be developed as a public
park. 540
1. Exhibit 34 (Conceptual Site Plan) and Exhibit 3-6 illustrate the force mains and
temp pipe staging impacting a large portion of the City's Lower Castaways site,
with the force mains running through the middle of the site. However, exhibit is not
consistent with paragraph on Page 3-11 project description that states preferred
location of force mains is on southern portion of the Lower Castaways site.
3
a. The location of the force mains and pipe staging as illustrated on the
exhibits is not acceptable to the City as it would severely encumber the site
and limit future use of the site.
b. Although the project description narrative acknowledges the City's preferred
location on the southern portion of the site, the DER does not analyze 5-10
potential biological impacts that could result from placing the force mains in
that location. Environmental analysis must take into account potential
impacts associated with constructing the force mains on the southern
portion of the site.
c. The City is not acceptable to utilizing Dover Drive for pipe staging and
instead would request that Bayside Drive be utilized for pipe staging as that
would result in less traffic impacts associated with road closures. The DER 5.11
should analyze potential environmental impacts associated with the
alternative pipe staging area and illustrate on an exhibit.
2. Force Main Improvements (Page 3-12) description states that work would occur
within existing disturbed area and pipe staging would occur along Bayside Drive. 5.12
The work area described and shown on Exhibit would preclude use of the entire
site for any other purpose during construction.
Cumulative Projects List
The cumulative project list included in Table 4-1 (Page 4-2) is out of date and includes
projects that have been denied, including AutoNation and 150 Newport Center Dr. Also, 5-13
other projects listed as under construction are complete, such as Santa Barbara Condos,
Newport Marina ETCO, Newport Beach Country Club. The most current version is
attached.
Biological Resources Analysis
Table 5.3-1 includes policy analysis related to potential biological impacts, concluding
that since the project would not affect ESA or ESHA, no survey/analysis would be
required. However, as discussed in the project description, the City preferred force main 5-14
alignment is to be located as closely as possible to the southernmost edge of the Lower
Castaways site. That portion of the property is currently vegetated. A biological
assessment shall be conducted to ensure potential biological impacts are adequately
avoided or mitigated. The policy analysis should be updated to reflect the additional
analysis.
4
Land Use and Relevant Planning
On Page 5.9-8, the second paragraph of LCP summary is outdated. The LCP was 5.15
certified by the California Coastal Commission on January 13, 2017 and become effective
on January 31, 2017. The City's certified LCP will be the standard of review for the coastal
development permit.
Transportation/Traffic
1. Construction related traffic impacts associated with staging and pipe stringing is
discussed related to Dover Drive; however, the City preferred location for pipe 5.16
stringing is to occur on Bayside Drive. Therefore, please include an alternative
analysis of potential construction related impacts on Bayside Drive related to pipe
stringing.
2. East Coast Highway is incorrectly referenced as Pacific Coast Highway throughout the
document. The highway is East Coast Highway east of the bridge and West Coast 5-17
Highway west of the bridge.
3. Pages 1-2, 2-14, 3-2, required permits from the City include a Site Development
Review permit for the construction of the pump station. The Site Development 5.18
Review Permit requires Planning Commission approval.
Please feel free to contact me at (949) 644-3232 or PAlford(&newoortbeachca.gov if you have 5-19
any questions.
Sincerely,
Patrick J. Alford
Planning Program Manager
Attachment: Cumulative Projects List
Cumulative Projects List
This list has three parts: Reasonably Foreseeable Projects, CIP (Capital Improvements Program) Reasonably Foreseeable Projects,
and Approved Projects
Reasonably Foreseeable Discretionary Protects with CEQA review or Traffic Study.
Legend: Projects Pending Coastal Commission RaiM
Protect Proposes land Usas/Proja. Lafaterr DlkNminatloNBUWa DNcntlaary Actloa ProfeU
DMCXP4on PMnner
A enditional use permit. minor she
development rev w, tentative Iract coastal DevNopment
map, and coastal develapment yelrat Pertnk No.CD2017 25
to demolish an existing 9au-squats • Site DembpmeM ad
foot commensal buiklrM and conMruot Use Plt No em .SD2o1T-
UIMen Sell tuts a new mixed-use aradure wIP 1.121 Application submittetl on March 9. ON Messrs.(Paaw-os9) ad, re feat of retail Poor area and ors, 410 antl 412 29-Stand 201T.Incompfele status.Ant'lapakd • conditional Use Permt Nee
2.34] square loot tlwellirg until on Lot Class J2 CEOAxempt Eon. klo UP20174C5
17 and ournsbed tluce raidental • Trust Map Pas.NmD12-
deetng sots ranging from 2.484 001(Ccunly Timpeas
square feet W 2.515 square feet ova paw Map W.181w)
1m618 and 19.
Newport Palrdec A Sae Devebpmenl Revues for peer
development of mixed-use residendal
project consisting of 350 rental unto 1701 Codnalen Way,4251, Appikerion submitted on May 31, . Ste DembPraa Redwv
a e 7.500 square last of aided use on a QW 842M MaMngae Way 2012.Under review far applioalon W.SD2017U RosallnN
5.7-acre property known as MaWlhur 42M 4220a420Smtt completeness.Antarpaled EIR and • Tenses,Tea]Map No. Ung
rquest Tls, in, h. hi Induda OMaeral 1880 Dee Street Traffic Study(TBD) Nr201T-002
and,
for lore Tr nega ndausbrem
ad a Tau.pro Tres Map fen future
cendomintum Wrpows.
Rev:2017-0S-13-ru .waNw.mow...w..w..mom.e eso v..,a.w_.wmy.w...•...p=ea.-u...+.m
•
Praia Model Deueptlun�raNa Lcugon O inalbNS 9 DNcreBcana'Acfiena Ms.
Harbor Pogo General Plan Amendment, Planned
(meal Plan
Senor Living General
Text Amendment, Amerament No.
(PM015S10f Conditional use Permit Major Site W2015-ON
Development Review for a hex • Planned Community
approximately 90,00?eauareiCot Scope,mnefiwg held on August 15. Text Amendment Np.
convalescent and cameraman rare W18.Project being revisited and PD201"05 Switch d
fordi,win 121 Gees(about 108 rare 101 Banlaw Pland reassigned by apPtieurVdevelgle.
units) As pastors, the Kali,rill be EIR prep onion on hole riceNM B. Site Development Zdeb9
draer,ad soon one level of M17. Review No.So2015L0T
subterranean pending ant four Insets of Conddional Use Pamlt
Irving ared.The pmjAd Site i5 currently, him UP2015O 7
devebped wftll a sin,le-gory ream dM • Mih,und Negative
ant supporting surface"clang arm Declaration
Ba*nxim
Zdebe
Final MND adopted on Match 22, • Mitigated Negative
translation of a divmnnn and infiltration Little2015.Project is on hold due to Desolation John
e dvice on a public beech am. Cesare Beetlt difficulties presented at Coastal . Capital Improvements Kappem,
Commission revises. Program.City Council PoMk
Wale,
• Planned Community
Development Plan
Amendment
•Site Development Plan
•Transfer of
hall Invariant Development of mixed use residential Application submiltee and deemed Development Right
Residential of up to 250 unite, 3 Oro at Med and 4400 Van lawman Ave. complete. EIR preparation is •Traffic Study RoselMh
(PA2015-024) acre per. undewnmy- •Tentative Tract Map Ung
• Development
Agreement
• Environments Impact
Report m
Rev:2017-06e13-ru rvainawow„nix—r ms_o.
i
Ptc)ast proposal Land UsoarProleC LoeaSun pbtmin•tloNSbbe DtecMlonery Actlon Pe l)
Ooscriptiort Planner
• General Plan
Amendment
• Coastal Land Use Palm
Amendment
C<elNan of an eniuh, one-story. • Zoning Code
26,219 aquara commerciallootcommercialWilding C„un .) (Zone
and a 55space suMananean pamieg • Planned Commends
Range: and the construction of a Development Plan
70.295 equars fam, "Umr ocean Adoption
literary faalily located on the 600 East • Transfer Development
Say parref removal of a 69-eoelaral 600 East Bay, 209 Allocation
ExpldrOccan apace surfuce parking lot (aka: Palm Washington Seoul. 600 and Applkation sulanni 04Q=016.On • SRO Development RoaellnM1
(Paaolo-08 KK 9) Ernest Parking Lot) ated 00 on the 209 W8 Salboa Avenue,and 2 hold per applicant's request. Review Unp
• Conditional Use Permit
Washington Street. 800 and 008 Palm
Saboa Avenue,and 2W Palm Is • Study Durauent to
City Olry'a nceTrafficPhaainp
and me square (m of a 68&spaca. Tentative(TPO)
1a1.U00 rouse loot. 6,o square
• and Tentative Percel Meg
pamieg structure pr and n fi,SN scale and Allor D velopmn
footageureneaasare p,., located • Harbor Development
On the waterside at Me prated. poem
• Coastal Development
Permit(By C must la
Coastalp.pulIalon)
• Report men1a11mDed
Report
Rev:rl1 T-0&13au s.w.,evns..wam.w .s_u,.aecanum•nm. e.w.w..ay.m_ em
Project vropeu0 WMttle. last Lateral MNImma0onds41ue OlunBenerit Actions Protect
Oeacflp0en Planner
• General Plan
AneaMmen.Coastal
land!Use Plan
Request for le9islakve approvals to Amendment.Code
accommodate Me future redevelopment The poled seas approved by City Amendment.Planned
of a penman of IM1e pmparlY with a Coundl on Febmary 11.2014,Tile Community
method a wet r oral rated. The 300 E,Coast H,h., Coastal Unit Use Plan Amendment Development Plan.Lot
Back Bay Land! Planned Community Development Plan Generally located d Me for Me pool vise approved by the line Adjustment,Traffic
irg Jaime
wale allow for Me Made
a e t1-4,1Immanuel m eo la east December
Coastal Commission on Study,and
(PA2011-210) mal enclosed tlry es. Mal stooge Coast HgM1way one Barsiee December Development
Emimnmenlalval! Munlla
facility for 140 Mao. 61534 square D(rve Silannevebpmenl Revlermit Repotl- enmvH
feel of visitorneeMnD retail and Channel Mdlad!0 Is, ent fit"
CLUP proval Amendment
49 afterned manna of unds. and up to antidpaod b be Ble]in 2010. Site D approval
49 alocM1etl residential uMs. • See ess&ComeM
Development
meat pal
Devebpmem Petme
requiretl
City W NewyOd Beach Public Access
Suisse Haring are Transient Docks and Expansion of ISLAND was approved by City ISIMND
awP Bull Manna Colonel on November 25,M14,SOR She Development
(PA:tm2-1IXe) 201 E.Coast Hlghte, and!CUP sere approved by Me City Ravens Perna,
(PA201S113) 24 boat slips In Fabmary ZM&The COP wm Conditional Use Panne "OM
• 14.252 SF resolvent approved by Me OCC In February CDP(Coastal
• s04 SF hands amaam 2017. Commissar)
Pajl approved by Bra City • General Plan
Febuary 2014, Coastal Lae Use Angndmete
Notation of Me splaoxkndely 20,5W 72o Wind Bay Avenue, 300 Plan Amendment aDDlkanan • CDesul Land Um Pen
haLygt Ha vor square fool yacht dub o0ilily and West Bay Avenue, 711.721 KiMegwn Indic O611bmia Consul AngndtneM Jim
YRM Club commuclion of a new 23.163 square West Bay Avenue, and 71P Commission in September 2015. • Zen,CWe Campbell
(PA2012A)91) IWI facility. The yacht dub use will 7M Means Boulevard Coasgl Commission consider a AngndtneM
remain on IM1e subject Dopaly. Coastal Development Permit lino Me • Punned Dev.10pmam
deplav mBnt yacht club on hemet More
2019.Under construction • Conditional Us.Permit
PC Development Plan
A 2YSnmm,20t,498aquaro-bol,noel See Development
on H.3 acres. Amenilles include a West side of IM1e Newppl Review
Ni syod Durex coffee alp.glNwMry sM1cp,bminess Dunes Resom Sear mirq Application Incomplete, CoMebnal Use Parma Palrkk
Howl(PAi!()IG 5) molar, func0on rooms. spa/Illness Lagoon at 1131 Back Bay Coastal D.1 Us.Radl pa
leadlUOs.nslaurenl,pool,tennis hurls, Dme. Pelmet
.an vollaybell muds arq Dknk area. Eoviodmadol Immd
initial
Re,2017- 13ru rwNL.raousm.w...w..�o-,.e eawr..•.w.-rvrLtwa.m•r.�m.Aeie.m..,m.mm
i
PmFesed Lead UnaslPmlacl Local DemrminatlpN8laDa Dlacmlbel mwns Prolact
Dasedpuee Planner
AELVP'.Hryon Environs Land Use Plant COP;CoaffiI Onalopmanl P—nU CUP:Conadonal Um PenriL cy'.aLk yards)VA;Oavelogrcnl Pgreemenl:VT BP.Downtown SpecPc
Plant EIR Emimnmental Impal Repon',FAA:Feaval A-don Ad—nnudtion:SPA:Dea lPlan Anna eR Bsl:gtms Wcam le ell XBGS'Xun4nglon Beaty Genenam,B41p¢b
405;Intert444051teaanly;IBC:ll Pannell C ,..IS rail S1Wy;DO;Wine 1e0eo4yy CenleCIFCO:U.1Agency FOtma40e Cano+e8 W ion:LCP;Ue C841 Prcgnm;
Al Marne CoMs All Sbtion:all Miligabd Negafne Dal NO nal Oeda aWn:PA:Planning Ama:PC Planned Communry 4:square Ind.
SP:SpeuAc Plan SR3.
SOW RaM T3;TOR;Imnstmd deae4naent dgMs.TPM:Tentative Pawl Red TTM:TemaNV Tnd Mapi=veanad Tentah.Trod Map:ZC;Zone Cal
Rev:2017-0 13-ru rvtiNyrawnwra.rn...Lww.eewu..wy�.I.au.m.wpam_a..ntm
6
CIP Projects with CEOA review:
Pr*d Proposed Land tleesmrojaa Loutlon MbrminatloNSfehu Olecretlonery Mtlons Project
Deacdptlon Planner
Benjamin
Zdeba
Litlla Camara Final MIND adapted an March 22. • Midland Negative
IaflOBlion(PA201S Installation of a c arnmon and infXradon u Corona Beac
gp Ch 2016,Praloct is on hold due W Dedaralion John
ORIN(15)(1<) Moves on B public beats area. drikeo IOes presented at Coastal Capital Improvement Kappeler,
Commission review. Program,City Cooked Public
Woks
VAkdns Me westbound side of Wen . tBMa ive Bodement
Coast Highway at Old Newport .Capital Improvement
Old Nevgpd Boulevard to acmmmodale a thind Consultant was aelened for prged Program,Ctly Council Patrick
Blvd Must Coast through lane,a right turn packet and a Inlemsedbn of Old Newport dagn in March of 2016.Negative g mega
bike lane.Realignment of Old Newport Boulevard and Wen Coast Decl...too draft is completed.City la
Hwy Widening Boulevard maximizes Me night turn Highway reeoesting lead agency status from Public
(tSRtg) pocket storage lengtharts improves CBI Trans. Rwanda,
roadway geometries.
Lower Sunset Yew Possible pedestrian ovelvossiiga, MRFP for design yng • Capital Improvement Addy'Rem.
Park Bridge,Parking pakig and park uses for Lower Surmel Metropolitan of Wen Coal in Deoatro design of .CEOA Program,City Coastal Public
La ark Park View Park Highway and Superior Avenue(15R09) World,
determination TBD. Wo
. NARROW Negative
Whoa Island! Poeset stopped in 2011.A mnsulleM DeGaralron Bob Stein,
S..0 New keawall along Me Grant Canal BeOea Island he.been aebcted far Me paled pit. Capital Improvement Public
Rappraduchon and on Me east and of Balboa Want. dal The RFP pm par.has nor Yet Pmgrvn,City Countll Wptap
(15H11) been initiated for the sell
Arches drain ootW is Me ampere for .Capital Improvement
two large storm unions that collect and P"parn,city Council
deliver runoff tram neighboring areas to
Newport Harbor The west storm droln
Wllems runoff from Hoag Hospital and
Ammo Slam D.I. areas upstream and the earl storm Portland headed in 2015.CEDA John
Diversion drain runs along Old Newport Newyo t Boulevard rats of dnnmir n TBD(ekemptio.i). Kappeler,
(ifil Boulevard and into Costa Mesa Coen Highway MOGpaladyrolenstanmw. Public
upstream of 15ih Street A conceptual Baptisms 2015. Work.
plan to dived dry weather Mows from
In...sudwatershads t.Ne
sanitary sewer system has been
Prepared.
Rev:2017- Ml3-m
PrPplast Proposed"Adlilwn rWept Loutlon Dwhanni enPMaMua 0hmmBenanA ... Phi Deran"Festores a drainage resch seafarer to City Council authoriutl pai In Capital Improvement John
r3ayview Heights armai and creates a wetlantl at Me Haadlande area of Dpper Bay Maya 2015.Agency permit Pmgmm,City Conrad "Meier,
Drainage Treatment and of 0m reach to trough downsamin of Meld Diom applkalicns were submitted Mason Ad Panic(151 wonmental water yualpy. 2o16,CEDA determination TBD
(eaenp5n2) Works
Dmor about one third of Me dry- . MNgatetl Negative
waalher flow ImAn to rnak into a Declaration
bioneactor.The bioreacYar strips . Capital Improvemwd
selenium and other impurities from the Program,City Council
flaw.Olean Dow is returned to Me creek John
to rMuce the cencentrz5on of
Bg Canyon Rehab pPllulanrs within the stream by 30-35 Bg Canyon,downstream of Resource agent,applications MWeler,
ProjeU percent.Storm flows from Jamboree Jamboree Road ark tau@of submitted March of 2016.Dmfl MIND No.
(15X12) Road also will be directed W the top Big Canyon Creak issued for public comment March 4. Worka
kva of Mrs bioreacromeflands As strip 2016.
roadway pollutants from the Dow before
Me flow rejoins the creek.Partial
so-eambed and canyon resicraeon are
cemponepl6 of this Pmi
• Capri Improvement Patrick
Bay CrossMgs Replaces,dererioregng water Program.City Couplet AmJnleBa,
Water Mahe trareamission mains present to the Newport Hatear A nnsultanl has been retained for Public
Replamnwl Water Master Plan and Bey Creasing Are pral design.CECA TEND Works
(16W12) Water Transmisi ion Study.
Rev:2017-OB-13ru r _o.,—swr-row Prwe_n—j-pw,_... w.
Ny
O
Discretionary Projects with CEOA review and Traffic Study Approved by the City and Percent Occupied:
Pmtect PgposM Lana Other rgcaenn pelerminatlonSYWe oiaCnleaury Mbns Pml Planner TmM ParCent
Study Occupied
Planning Commission Minor Use Pemlit No.
ENC Environmental Nature Center Approved OtnVi Class UP2015-020
Presctwal 745 Dover DrwB 32 CEGA Exemption,Plans Marta Nova Yes 0%
(PA2015-0yg) Presdrod Nave not been submitted i Traffic BbdY No,
plan cLedr at this time. TS2015p01
Pans Avenue MIND adogeNapproved by Mtl 1edN Naftali
Oriel,th art replace Pans Avenue iga a9
Bridge and Li emet .nnacla Kalb. IalarM Ballow IsaM City Council November 25, pecla2tion No. Gregg Ramirez No 0%
ReplxNrent end Little Balboa Island Untie' ND201C-002
(PA2010.135) UMercpnabupion
• Site Development
Review No. 302014-
005
The project includes the do Application submitted on Minor Use Parmt No.
subdivissm of four lots'into three lob ogN5201e UP2010.032
Birch Newpart for commerrval development art for 2036062o36D . Traffic Study No.
Executive condominium purposes,and the Birch Street Application and Addendum l0 Y
Center construchum of two.2-story medical (Formally 20352— MIND approved by Plemming TS20144106 Jain Phi Yee 051
(PA2010.121) oeies,buildings totaling 64 NO 20412 Birch St) Commission on 0VIWO15. . Parcel Map No.
si harder gross door area art is Rougn Owing pemilb geued NP2014-0I7
32e-spar.surface parking lot February 25,20W . Addendum the
Mitigated Nepalese
Declaration(PA2W8-
280)
Rev:2o1 7-0&13-ru rya..cow...ewe�w...do-avawrwe,..w-r,am.tu.w..w.�m.u-.r..na.e
Ny
O
Project Proposed land Uses lautlen DNemllnutlaNBbM DlecretlonaryA orxs Protect Planrnr T'a^k Percent
Stltly CauFbd
The protect includes a Tenl dice
Tract Map aWlicalion to subdivide a
LTaGe site for 83 residential b13
and a Site Development Rai Application submitted On • Tentative TW Map
application for the construction ad 83 082(1201C. No,NT2014-002
singleunit residancee pnvNa An MIND acts prepared. The • TreMC Study No.
streels,ma.open spare,and proled was approved and Me TS2014-0O7
andarapirg. The Planned 1560 Placentia MIND was adopted by Me
Ebb Tide Cemmuup,Development Plan is Planning Commission an Planned DavebpmeM Jim CNnpbeg Y. 0%
(PA201C-110) proposed to establish guidelines for Cdro August 6,2015, Permit No.PL2015-
development of that project site Under mrStrWbn. Wit
nsistent aito the General Plan. Comberon a initial phama • Mitigated!Negative
The Cade Amendment is proposed to anticipated In lab 2017 Ot Dedaraion No.
mend iNa ZOmg Map to change the early 2018. Ni
Zonng Oipl id ham Mulllple-Uhd
Residential(RM)to Planned
Community(PC).
• General Plan
Project opposed!by the City Amendment
General Plan Amendment, Coastal September 2010. • Coastal Lai Use
Land Use Plan Amendment, and Plan Amendment
Lido He. Zoning Amendment to Change rile Coastal Develognenl PxMl , Zoning Code
Hotel from Pull Facilities to Yttilor- 3300 Newpad awed!Felauery 2016, Amendment
at the lamm serving commercial and Increase the Boulevard and • Site Oeuebpment JM CYtvw Vee 0%
city hall allOwabM buildinghelghL Demolition 47532'^SOeet Cem.^Ybn Complete end new Review
mr complex of loer city hall buildings and the constructed underway. , Conditional Use
PP2011217) mnsWGlion of a 130-room upsGele Permit
hotel. Fire Station p2 to remain at Completion of comWMbn . Ground Lease
nent location anticipated by summer of , Environnrental loped
2018. Report
Construction of tea bolding and a 2011.20a3,2121. Cbea 32 CECA exemption.
10ree-level peeing structure, an and 2131 June 19,=14:Planning , Site Caeselopment
WestdiB addition to an existing building, and Wanted DTl the de CommissionA
molidGn of 25,339 s uare feet Bounded pwWnd' RNlew
Medical of building area. The pri t would Wel DMre, CamMlfwn Complete end a TmiAO Study Jim CMrpMll Vee 0%
(PP2013151) construction underway.
al In four bier total
tobling T3}22 Irvine Avenue, Completion by the end of • Lot Mager
,d uere feet.The tool amount of . and Shedrgbn 2018.
arrest pending would be 3B2 epame. Place.
Rev:2G17-01i rvrNymmmi,rsew.w..dwuaneewem.ww.-n.IgJrram�{A•paVan.n.a®
i
Project Proposed Larq Utee Lg4Ye" OBIermInHIOnBYWO DIKmtYnery OLUMe Project planN Traffic Patten
Mindy Occupied
• General Plan
Building pemttls have expired Amendment
and require a new plan chop . Coastal Land Use
worried and e"Illes to we Plan Amendment
M03 ant 3355 Building Code,oiscretionan znin Cotle
Request for the demolition of an apprcadonsare slillvalid since o9
Via We Amendment
Lido Villas existing chump and office b,the irepmap wassurcordato
(CART) and IegisWgve approvals fro the found¢(generally pupl'IC Wohs to recordation, • Planned Community Mayarw Now No 11%
Eaunded Uy Cevelopmenl Rhin
(PA2012-106 do,opment of 2J omini H Yren Nomentpen12,201 N
story lownhome condominium¢ Lido,Via Chiral Amendment
ap roved LUPWC Review
on and Via Malaga Agtpndmenta2014.0 by CCC
on March 12,prove CCP Review
application Approved by CCC • Negative
on lrr92r10, Darianvinn
TBnfeeTrztl Map
Amendment b be North Newport
Cenler Planned C,..ad,
(NNCPC), which is the inning
document that established YIM usaa,
Villas Fashion development standards, and • Transfer N
Island procedures tar development wine The protect wee approved by Development
subareas of the Newport the City Cona l on August 14, . Planned Community Jaime Mudlb
(Formal San save" Hirt San Joequln
Center Arms o/Ye CIty,easing y the 2r12. Tent to me nlent Ven tr%
Joaquin Plaza request moNel increasing the Hill.Road . Development Benjamin Ztlehe
ADa^"e"Y) WM,n Me devemp..4 allocation under mnvhuGlon. Agreement
(PAzrtzLzr) unitsn tea WWINNCPCof 24 aao M.elnng . Traffic Study
umYta a If ofsza dwelling wins
tint m of ge units)and albcehng
the unlY to Ye San Joaquin Plea
dub area.
Rev:2017- 11ru rw..eoasn,ne —Av-.c_o..n cWwd .._ _a,,.me:.
If
it
Protect Proposed Und Uaea Lacatlnn DeNrmholl.w3laWe DlecrNlenary Ac6nne ProfMPlanner Traffic Percent
Study Occupled
• PC Development Plan
EIR.TonlaVre That Map Amendment and
Traffic Study,and AHIP were Adoption
Uses. approved by City Coundl an • Tentative Timor Map
Newport Development of 1,2"residential 2P26I201 3.The PC • Trade Brady(TPO)
Mired Use units ant 11.500 d..a comme bed AJti&4321 Development Plan and . AHIP RDsalirm Ur, Yes 0%
Development retail Jambmee Rd Development Agreement sere . DA
(PA2011-1M) approved on 311 MO13, . Airport Land Use
Construdion for POase 1 Commission
development is undated, . Environmental impact
Report
. PC Development Plan
Approved by Ow City Courrce Amendment
on October 25,2011.PC
•
Transfer of
McWrlbur Developmentof
RgtIN
Deareand!di0onotaTof12,responded51 a Development ber pla22, 011, veel
The
DopNinSbNer ant tlevekmmeM of 12,351 if Street
t Way on NOvember22,2011.The Traffic Study(TPO) RpypliM Unit year 90%
Way SNker Way CUP
commercial rebid. pml¢M i%cg Wilda g Th¢ of DA
(PA2010.135) commuciegbuiletocctl'a Waiverbn
consWMtlbut notOauPieQ Mod?wlron Permit
• Mitigated Nege0ve
Decleretion
10 BU Crayon Whistled Negative DeGaretionM ISAANU approve!12R012011,
(PAA10092) single-few edenrolo=Wa 10 Big Certain Praised haskas not been . ISRANO Mariana Never No 0%
Amendment to Beyvlew Planned On June 22,2010 COy CouMl
Community(PC-32)bed to add approved Reeolugon No.
D.I.S.C.3601 oulPNlend surgery and medkal office 20104TO finding that Traffic
Jamas amended uses and to add a
and MI
Rd 3501Jamboree Study ND.TS20e TPO . PCAmendment
and301 PaMleg seem
usesMcludes0 puare Rd.and 301 July E. 010rpprved and an . TreMC Study canplbe McIIMa WaeNn Y. 100%
feet for
undu uses.Includes TaT
Barilow circle ars to TPO forr _ BeyviewCirde July E.2010 approved wi10 TPO
(PA2010082) of 38759 were fast of genmelrelon Ordinance la.n2010-12
ed!Co
office ant rmait lo outpatient aurgkeI approving Planned COmmunAy
near Amendment No,PD20104)Oa.
Rev:2017- 13-ru
x
Project pnpOaeE Land U. L.Oulbn OeNrminatlOnBtaWa Dlecretldury RctlOne Proje0lPMnnar Thai Percent
Study Occupied
Buiidng pNmXs for maidemal
por5on depend 03/172017.
Cornmeal Wide subm iced
for plan tll0tk June 30,2014_
Application approved by Site Development
Planning Commission on 'i
Playa Cdpia DBVNOpWnl of 1,750 sf mar office 390039iS E8M 1MW13.Staff Approval No. Variance
del Mar epem and eu(B)delaNed COaalHgMmy SA20f M15(PA2013-2A5) Conditional Use Makers Nova No 0%
(PAN)HO) 1) Penitential approved December 10,2013 permit
and SUR Arpin N0. Tentative Tmq Map
SP201<-ADM 10,2015 to aora MWi50aPm Permit
me remner ction of Sell.a
and redac4m of commercial
scope.CEDA Class 32
a.amplipn.
• MediSpUer Permit
OldheatedDemolition W3eaiati�g Wildi�tgaro IBRAND and potion approved • Tralfle Study
328.M.end 3e0 on livered,9.2010,0emolitor • Use Palms
on GPA Project cstmct a.25.000,0 medical Old Newaot Bled and gratling permits issued • GP Pmendmenl Jaime Mudlb Yea 0%
(PA200B-0p]I Wide buikli�p. March 6.2015. • eclaati Nepal
n
EIR
Hoag GP Amendment
M9mvmial Radiocabon M up to 225,000 at 01 1HWg Ot' Point SIR counted! ad project Planned Community
HW W pfavioueryapp0ved(but w delivered W091 approved ore May 13,200.No Darebpmmt Plan
Pre9bylPlan conetruompete Pounds e Up,pe M1om Uw WwmOpr development aW (PC(TeM Mrendmenl Jim Cenpp011 YW 0%
Mealm Plan Lower Compete lathe Upper Coast Hwyand been consWctnd or is banned Oevebul
Update Pojep DamDW, NewPOd BNO In the War Nture. A®fWmam
(PA200]-073j Cml
CDP( C
• CDP CC)
Rev:2017-0613-ru 1a rose—evreviw.mca—_nyre�uawmwyq_en.nw
If
it
Proleol PmpoxE Lend U. Decetlon MMminetloNStutua Distortional Actions Projact Planner Treflk Percent
Study Occupied
Residential development idduairg 201—M7 • EIR
the milmaiy:led the demoload of me Came.Ave Final SIR vas central are • GP Amendment
existing pardeMial structures on the and 101 BaysMe project approved by the City • Coastal land Use
AERIEProjecl 1A-acre sit .(b)the devekptrenl of Pl;souNwl of on July 14,2009,A CUP has Plan iCLUP)
(PA5-198) 8 residential condominium units;and Bayaide Done been approved by the Coastal Amendmenl Jim Campbell Ne 0%
(c)the replacement,remnflgursta , belwaen Samna commission.Pmjed Is under . zone Charge
and exp inerm of the existing PI and Cameroon compresion wM completion . Trep Map
gangway platform,pier valkway,ant Ave,Corona del anticipated by mid 201 B. . Madificatipn PomW
catch ecilaes an the site. Mar • COP(CCC)
Newport PER mrtiped in February She Pen Review
Mend,— A mixed us deve'oPmenlconseting M Terdeprrie Trecl Map Um Perm
ETCO of 27 mstlerbal units and 2300 Newyp! extended!in October Ml0.The . Terdetie Trap Map Jkn Cprebep 0%
Development apprmiouddy 38.000 square eel of Seulmmid Project is under wnsirwti0n . Environmental lmpep
ant is maidwad to be
(PAZ001-210) releilandolRe uses complete M summer MIT Rerad
An ISIMND was released b
public notlex on Apil 11, • GP Amendment
2011, The MIND ores mopped s Code emendmal
and the propel apprgved by a CUP
Manmis A 19,905-sf.Mosdory comm paM1aaal the City Counal on August 9, a Variance
Pointe building and a three-storyhg tW Wep Ccaal 2011. Consbuclbn completed . Site Davekgmenl Jsime MUMb Yea BB%
(PAMt0.114) structure. W9heay on OUcbor 30, 2014, and Review
tenants are beginning to . Tragic Study
occupy suges.(43%occuloW, . Miligeled flagstones
23% Ti in prams, 34% Declaration
vemM).
Newport The City Council approved the • GP Amendment
Bue. Demings p nsousIta phn 46,04echad Rate Jamboree • PC exl amaMmenl
boars Square
a e Wt thu a new lads, Camp es Damee Orolep on thnmry 2B 2011. • Tentelive Parcel Mep Jmml Brown 0%
dpPropel goatee apwre dot buslrwet plated. Campus Dave The proceed has not been Mitigated Negative
(PAZ00&1tM) conebatpee. Declaration
Rev:2017-W-13-ru rva..eoaswewa�w...,anon.,,eswr..w-.m.Luxw..rw»a.nu.-ar.n.am
prejacl PmpecaE Lane Uses Lectllen DeblminallsmRialua Discretionaryilcffan, Project Planner Trellic P•raed
Study Occupied
Increase the maximum allOwabk M IVIAND was releases for
PRIES Offs Paliament by 11.W game St. public review on May 19,2010. • GP Amendment
in...Me maximum albwade The MIND was candifms and!me • PG Tern numerical
Buia'rng B 4300 Van F'ynlan
Project net at
offfor
development
menB by 9.917 A. Council
to nFebmby@e City • Parcel Mapd!N JarolBram 0%
(PA200]213) na15f10 ofoftlevelupm erINS OOueOit on Febrvdry M.2011. • Mlligaconson five
gnew rammi v gookbuiltl'rngovete Project Na rof been peclare�on
9rountlJevN paAing shuclure. constructed.
AELUP:Aipan EnWons lend Use Plen:CDP'.Coastal Development Partial CUP:Control Um Pemrll:0y'.mimic yunisl OA:Developmsnl
Agareara l:DTSP:Down.SppCRC Pass,SIP Fnmmnmen4l lmpq Rascal FA A:FBEent A..PgminiAA40¢GPR Gimlet Plan Mrardngnt:
grt,pwn bass HBGS:HurNnghm Bntlr Garean g Station:HOS:Inlarelale 405 finese,IBG IMne Businee5 Gxnple,IS:Initial SN4y,ITC:
Irvine TMlcbgy Cartel I ICO.1-1 Ann,Fnmalion Commieson:LCP:Lcal Coastal Pogrom:MCAS:Marine Curtis All Sworn,Ml Mipa.
Nimmons Discussions ND:seismic D,x,m nil PA:Panning Area:PC:Pbllrro Community:9:squarefmt SIR Speafic Plat SIR]3:Same RdXe]3:
TDR:...of Eevmlap ri iglu:TPM:Tmm.Pascal is TIM:Tm ..0 Mep'.VTTfA:Ved,..a.Tract P.2C'..Clranme
Rev:2017-0 13ap su...cmosa.—,w...q unmce._.1I�.nmr ,swa._��mmm
v-
ia
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pmnp Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 5
Patrick Alford,Planning Program Manager
City of Newport Beach
August 4,2017
5-1 This is an introductory comment. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or
involve an environmental issue. As such,no further response is necessary.
5-2 The City of Newport Beach expressed concern regarding the construction of the proposed
gravity sewer improvements along East Coast Highway. In response to the City's concerns,
OCSD has provided a potential option to construct the new gravity sewer on the Balboa
Marina West property,which is owned by the Irvine Company. The optional alignment would
traverse the property from a west to east direction,beginning at the gravity sewer connection
within Bayside Drive and terminating approximately 645 feet within the Balboa Marina West
property parking lot; refer to Exhibit 1, Gravity Sewer Alignment 00on. OCSD is currently
discussing this option with affected property owners (including the Irvine Company). If the
property owners agree to this optional alignment,the construction of the gravity sewer would
occur in conjunction with the construction of the Balboa Marina West Expansion project. As
shown in Exhibit 1, the optional alignment would occur within a previously disturbed area
(i.e., a paved parking lot) associated with the Balboa Marina West facility. As noted in the
City's comment, this optional alignment would occur at a slightly greater distance from the
nearest sensitive receptors (residential uses northeast of the intersection of East Coast
Highway/Bayside Drive). As such,it is not anticipated that implementation of this optional
alignment would result in a new significant impact or substantially increase the severity of an
impact that has been identified in the DEIR.
If the affected property owners do not agree to this optional alignment, the gravity sewer
improvements would be required to remain along East Coast Highway,as described on DEIR
pages 3-7, 3-10, and 3-12. However, as noted in Section 5.11, Tranr�ortation/Traii, of the
DEIR, short-term impacts along East Coast Highway would be reduced to a less than
significant level with implementation of Mitigation Measure TRA-1. Mitigation Measure
TRA-1 would require engineering drawings and specifications that would implement a variety
of measures to minimize traffic impacts. The engineering drawings and specifications would
be subject to approval by OCSD, Caltrans, and the City to ensure that impacts would be
minimized to a level below significance.
5-3 To address this comment, Mitigation Measure AES-2 has been revised as follows. In addition,
minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure AES-2 on DEIR page 5.1-17 have been
included to provide additional clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process.
AES-2 Prior to construction of the new pump station facility,OCSD shall submit design
plans of the proposed pump station to the City of Newport Beach Direstersf
or review and annroval by the City's Planning
Commission or delegated authority for Site Development Review and to
determine consistency with the Back Bay Landing PCDP design guidelines. Tke
Orange County Sanitation District Direeter af Ergifteering shall peaAde final
review and approval of design plans, in consideration of comments received b
the Director of Cnmmunity Pesxelepme�.
Final .December 2017 2-45 Responses to Comments
k
I- Ejst Coast Mg�h
or i�•a -;- - ,cam \`-
on
I ' i
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
5-4 Comment noted. To address this comment, Mitigation Measure AES-4 has been revised as
follows. In addition,minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure AES-4 on DEIR page 5.1-
19 have been included to provide additional clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting
Process
AES-4 Prior to construction of the proposed pump station,the eantraetot shall ptevide
lighting plans shall he rovided to the Orange County Sanitation District
for review and approval and to the City of Newport
Beach for review and a"roval by the 013fs Planning Commission for Site
evelopment Review, The linhtino plan shall illustrating illustrate consistency
with the Back Bay Landing PCDP regulations for fighting. Per these
requirements, all outdoor lighting fixtures shall be designed, shielded, aimed,
located,and maintained to minimize impacts to adjacent sites and to not produce
glare onto adjacent sites or roadways.
5-5 To address this comment,Mitigation Measure NOI-1 has been revised as follows. In addition,
minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure NOI-1 on DEIR page 5.10-I6 have been
included to provide additional clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process.
NOI-1 Prior to the initiation of construction,the Orange County Sanitation District shall
confirm that the Grading Plan,Building Plans,and specifications stipulate that
• Ail construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with
properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required
noise attenuation devices.
• The wan"sete Orange County Sanitation District shall provide a
qua4i€ed `Noise Disturbance Coordinator." The Disturbance
Coordinator shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints
about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the
Disturbance Coordinator shall
eaw44a;atsnddetermine the cause of the noise complaint(e.g.,starting
too early,bad muffler, etc.) and shall implement respensble measures to
comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. The `mmKr+name and three —' 'L—' 'h
construction hotline telephone number fee the Di5tufbRftee Goeedinate
shall be clearly posted on-site.
• When feasible,construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise
sensitive uses (e.g.,residences, schools,hospitals,etc.).
• During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed
such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers.
• Tc ical construction activities that produce noise shall not take place
outside of the allowable hours specified by the City of Newport Beach
Final.December 2017 2-47 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Municipal Code Section 10.28.040(7:00 a.m.and 6:30 p.m.on weekdays,
8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays; construction is prohibited on
Sundays and/or federal hoLdays). Alternative work hours may he
designated by the City to reduce other i nacts, such as traffic.
5-6 To address this comment,Midgation Measure'IRA-1 has been revised as follows. In addition,
minor editorial revisions to Midgation Measure TRA-1 on DEIR page 5.11-6 through 5.11-8
have been included to provide additional darity regarding the monitoring and reporting process.
TRA-1 Prior to initiation of construction activities,
engineerine drawings and specifications; shall be submitted for review and
approval by the Orange County Sanitation District
California Department of Transportation and the City Public Works
Department These documents shall, at a
minimum,address the following:
• Traffic control for any lane closure,detour,or other disruption to traffic
circulation includinz bicycle and pedestrian trails. Bicycle and pedestrian
trails shall remain open durinn construction or re-routed to ensure
continued connectivity
• "�" Bus stop access shall be a,.,taine'ned coordinated with
OCTA.
• At least three business days before any construction activities that would
affect travel on nearby roadways,the construction contractor shall notify
the
Depffs eats d City of Newport Beach Public Works Department,of
construction activities that could impede movement (such as lane
closures) along roadways,to allow for uninterrupted emergency access.
Surrounding property owners shall also be notified of project activities
through advanced mailings.
• Identify construction vehicle haul routes for the delivery of construction
materials (i.e.,lumber, tiles,piping,windows, etc) to the site; necessary
traffic controls and detours; and a construction phasing plan for the
project.
• Identify any off-site construction staging or material storage sites.
• Specify the hours during which transport activities can occur and
methods to mitigate construction-related impacts to adjacent streets.
• Require the Contractor to keep all haul routes clean and free of debris,
including but not limited-,to,gravel and dirt resulting from its operations.
The Contractor shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the Orange
Final.December 2017 2-48 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
County Sanitation District,of any material which may have been spilled,
tracked, or blown onto adjacent streets or areas.
• Hauling or transport of oversize loads shall be allowed between the
hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. only, Monday through Friday. No
hauling or transport shall be allowed during nighttime hours,weekends,
or Federal holidays. Any oversized loads utilizing Coast Highway shall
obtain a Caltrans permit for such activities.
• Use of local streets shall be prohibited. except what is renuired to
provide direct access to the proiect cite.
• Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall yield to public traffic
at all times.
• If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, streets,
curbs, and/or gutters along the haul route, the contractor shall be fully
responsible for repairs. The repairs shall restore the damaged property
to its original condition.
• All constructed-related parking and staging of vehicles shall be kept out
of the adjacent public roadways and shall occur on-site or m thin other
Off-street areas.
• Construction-related lane closures will would only occur between the
hours of 9-00 8.30 a.m. and 3-00 3.30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
More or less restrictive closure hours may be prescribed by the City
• Use of a construction flagperson to assist in maintaining efficient vehicle
travel in both directions, particularly during peak travel hours, and use
of construction signage and safe detour routes for pedestrians and
bicyclists when travel lanes and sidewalks along Coast Highway, Dover
Drive,and Bayside Drive are affected.
• The engineering drawings and
specifications shall meet standards established in the current California
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device (MUTCD).
5-7 The comment states that the most recent version of the Bay Back Landing Planned
Community Development Plan(PDCP)was adopted on November 22,2016. However,after
further dialogue with City of Newport Beach staff, it was confirmed that the Aprl 26, 2016
version is indeed the latest document. The DEIR has been revised to reflect this version of
the PCDP. Paragraph one on DEIR page 2-8 has been revised as follows:
Final .December 2017 2-49 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
• Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (RC-9) (adopted February 25,
2014,Ordinance No.2014-4(PA2011-216)and Amended April 26 2016.0rdinance
No. 2016-81. The Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9)(Back
Bay Landing PCDP) is a redevelopment plan involving a mixed-use waterfront
project. This project would construct a dry stack boat storage facility for 140 boats,
61,534 square feet of visitor-serving retail and recreational marine facilities, and up
to 49 attached residential units. The Back Bay Landing PCDP establishes
appropriate zoning regulations governing land use and development of the Planned
Community site, consistent with the General Plan and CLUP. The Back Bay
Landing PCDP provides a vision for the land uses on the site,sets the development
standards and design guidelines for specific project approvals at the Site
Development Review and Community Development Plan approval stage, and
regulates the long term operation of the developed site.
Section 10.01 page 10-2 of the DEIR has been revised as follows:
City of Newport Beach, Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9),
Adopted Febmary 25,2014 and Amended Anril 26. 2016.
5-8 As explained in the previous response,the most recent version of the PCDP was adopted on
April 26, 2016. The following revisions were made to reflect this amended version of the
PCDP. DEIR pages 5.1-11 and 5.1-12, Subsection B, Permitted Height of Stractures has been
revised as follows:
B. Permitted Height of Structures
1. Building Height
The maximum allowable budding height shall be 35 feet for structures with flat
roofs and 40 feet for structures with sloped roofs (minimum 3:12 pitch), except as
follows:
a) As illustrated on Exhibit 3, Building Heights, 100 feet from back of curb along
Bayside Drive within the eastern portion of Planning Area 1, maximum
allowable building height shall not exceed 26 feet for flat roofs and 31 feet for
sloped roofs.
Final .December 2017 2-50 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
e)b) Within Planning Area 1, maximum allowable height for any parking structure
shall not exceed 30 feet for flat roofs and 35 feet for sloped roofs.
f)e) All other exceptions to height shall be regulated pursuant to Section
20.30.060.D of the Municipal Code.
5-9 Comment noted. DEIR pages 5.1-13, Subsection A,Ambitertural Tbeme has been revised as
follows:
A. Architectural Theme
The development shO be designed with a Coastal Mediterranean architee�eal flieme.
This architectural theme is influenced by the climate of the countries it comes from,
emulating palettes nf the landscape,and uclutecture in the Nnrth Mediterranean Sea.
windows and doers, canvas awnings, and decorative ifen eriffi. q-he iftee
select a historically specific or rigid arelittectural style R�r the peajeet,but to help shap
the character of the area and reflect its setting within the City;
The develnnment shall he designed with a Coastal architectural theme. This
architectural theme is influenced by the marine climate of the California coa. * v'th
varied historical vernacular and casually elegant palette with building forms and
massula that define and create unique and often seamless indoor/outdoor spaces The
project would follow principles of quality design,exhibiting a high level of architectural
standards and shall be compatible with the surrounding area, sensitive to scale
proportion,
_ and identity with a focus on place-making Massing offsets variation of
roof lines, varied text r s. o ni r ss c and desiga accents on all-littildi g
elevations shall he nrovid d to enhance the architectural design, The int nt is not to
.select a historically specific or rigid architectural sWe for the 12roject, hut to create a
active, mixed-use villaee.
5-10 This comment states that the location of the force mains within the Lower Castaways Park
site and pipe staging along Dover Drive is not acceptable to the City as it would severely
encumber the site and limit future use of the site. The City expresses a preference that the
force mains be constructed in the southerly portion of the Lower Castaways Park site. As a
means of resolving this concern, OCSD has investigated the possibility of shifting the force
main improvements to be within the southerly portion of the site;refer to Exhibit 2,Cone tual
Site Plan. The temporary construction staging area would encompass the entire Lower
Castaways Park site as analyzed in the DEIR. The shift of the force mains further south would
move the borehole locations and work areas further to the south,in addition to the force main
alignment that would occur via horizontal directional drilling(HDD) or microtunneling.
Final .December 2017 2-51 Responses to Comments
I F
'T
�enana,i xaM,mwmau�a,Na+nmia.
do
xois Tn¢aw.¢consaerea mnwyeuinarvWmiwmmurennemeniaNrew�mnaeebnpu�..
xoTroscue FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAINS REPLACEMENT PROJECT
Q Conceptual Site Plan
w.
ENI60 2
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
By shifting the alignment south, construction activities would encroach into a vegetated area
within the southerly extent of the Lower Castaways site (whereas the DEIR assumed the work
area would be limited to unvegetated areas only). Based on a review of site conditions, the
southern half of Lower Castaways Park is entirely disturbed,primarily consisting of bare ground
and gravel,with the western and southern perimeters dominated by non-native ornamental trees,
shrubs, and ground cover. Dominants include eucalyptus (Ecclpyptus sp.), acacia (Acacia sp.),
ngaio tree (Myopomm laemm), giant cane (Amndo Bona%), Canary Island date palm (Pboenix
eanariendr),and Hottentot fig(Carpobmw e"ir),with patches of native saltgrass (Dirtirblis ipicata)
scattered throughout. The eastern portion of the Lower Castaways site consists of bare ground
where recreational water craft parking and access to Newport Bay waters is located. Special-
status species with the potential to occur within this area are primarily limited to nesting birds
protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code,
particularly during the bird breeding season (typically January through July for raptors and
February through August for other birds). Mitigation Measure BIO-1 of the DEIR would
implement requirements to minimize impacts to nesting birds consistent with the MBTA,and
would reduce impacts to a level below significance(minor editorial revisions to BIO-1 are noted
below to provide clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process). A small drainage
feature is located in the northwest portion of Lower Castaways Park where off site storm flows
surface from a heavily-buried culvert and re-enter another heavily-buried culvert approximately
40 feet to the west before being conveyed off-site;however, this feature is outside of the area
proposed for development. Based on analysis provided within the DEIR and a review of on-
site conditions, the slight shift of the force main facilities to the southerly portion of Lower
Castaways Park would not result in any new significant impact or substantially increase the
severity of an impact that has been identified in the DEIR.
Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure BIO-1 on DEIR page 5.3-10 has been included
to provide additional monitoring and reporting clarification. Mitigation Measure BIO-1 has
been revised as follows:
BIO-1 To the extent feasible, construction activities shall be scheduled outside of the
nesting season (typically February 15 to August 15) to avoid potential impacts
to nesting birds. However,if construction must occur during the nesting season,
all suitable habitat surrounding the project site shall be thoroughly surveyed for
the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist prior to commencement of
site disturbance activities.
If an active avian nest is discovered in proximity to the project site during the
nesting bird survey,construction activities shall stay outside of a 300-foot buffer
around the active nest. For raptor species, this buffer shall be expanded to 500
feet. A biological monitor shall be present to delineate the boundaries of the
buffer area and to monitor the active nest in order to ensure that nesting
behavior is not adversely affected by construction activities. The buffer area
and limitations on construction may be reduced upon coordination with the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife, rovided the nesting behaviors are
not disrupted by construction activities Once the young have fledged, normal
construction activities shall be allowed to occur.
Final .December 2017 2-53 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
5-11 In response to the City's concerns regarding pipe staging, OCSD has provided a potential
option for pipe staging activities along Bayside Drive as shown on Exhibit 3 Temboraa Pibe
Stringy Alignment Option. The optional construction pipe staging alignment would be
approximately 1,457 feet in length and would extend approximately 250 feet from the
HDD/rnicrotunneling pit to Bayside Drive, continue approximately 990 feet east along
Bayside Drive, and would terminate approximately 220 feet northeast of the guard shack
associated with the Newport Dunes Resort Marina. The pipe staging areas would encompass
proposed pipe stringing activites, which would involve placing piping above ground within
existing roadway right-of-way and below ground,using a steel casing sleeve,within the existing
driveways in order to maintain traffic flow. If this optional alignment is selected, the pipe
stringing activities would occur for approximately 4 to 6 weeks in conjunction with the
construction of the proposed force mains. During this time, existing street parking and
sidewalk access would be affected. However, these temporary impacts would be short-term
and would cease upon completion of pipe stringing activities. As parking and sidewalk access
would remain on the other side of Bayside Drive during this time, these temporary impacts
would be less than significant. This potential pipe stringing option would occur entirely within
disturbed areas(existing roadway) and would not involve substantial ground disturbance,aside
from driveway locations to maintain access to adjacent properties. In addition, Mitigation
Measures AES-1,which would ensure staging areas are sited and screened to minimize visual
impacts (minor editorial revisions to AES-I are noted below to provide clarity regarding the
monitoring and reporting process), NOI-1 (refer to Response 5-5 above), and TRA-1 (refer
to Response 5-2 above)would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. If this
optional alignment is not selected, the pipe stringing would occur along Dover Drive as
analyzed in the DEIR. Based on analysis provided within the DEIR and a review of the
proposed optional pipe stringing alignment,this option would not result in any new significant
impact or substantially increase the severity of an impact that has been identified in the DEIR.
Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure AES-1 on DEIR page 5.1-16 has been included
to provide additional monitoring and reporting clarification. Mitigation Measure AES-1 has
been revised as follows:
AES-1 Prior to issuance of any grading and/or demolition permits,whichever occurs
first, engineering drawings and snecificadam
shall be submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation
District These
documents shall,at a minimum,indicate the equipment and vehicle staging
areas, stockpiling of materials, fencing(i.e.,temporary fencing with opaque
material),and haul route(s). Staging areas shall be sited and/or screened in
order to minimize public views to the maximum extent practicable.
Construction haul routes shall minimize impacts to sensitive uses in the project
area by avoiding local residential streets, as feasible.
Final .December 2017 2-54 Responses to Comments
a �
m e
r
- .E slCwsl Higary e' ♦ P
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
5-12 Refer to Response 5-10, above.
5-13 Comment noted. The fist of cumulative projects provided in Section 4.0 Baru of Cumulative
And ris Table 4-1, Cumulative Pmiects Lrt was derived based on information provided by the
cities of Newport Beach and Costa Mesa. The geographic areas were determined based upon
the project's scope and anticipated area in which the project could contribute to an incremental
increase in cumulatively considerable impacts. DEIR pages 4-2 through 4-5,have been revised
as follows:
Table 4-1
Cumulative Projects List
No.' I Name location Proposed Land Use Status
City ofM ort Beach'
4 Fke� P�zelepfflew 48 1 go us
P"Pen Reach RAF
pla.mg of
320-600 NesFCaast 92 B 1
2 St*act ....cssu�.,eot. Ts;Q
and Service Fae'l^y CunSuhast to be
kle.fified
3 i50-MexgertFsrof€r 'm`
w6s
4 Plempq LAD Ebselepme9201 st
�� Pebro issued
Ikvekamrent nfa mvaed-ace
ctmcb�R with 1.171 sa�re feet
ofretad&wrarea.one 2.347 Mlicmamd CEOA
1 I➢man Sad l9k 410 and 412 29-Street auam Got dwedme and a
three reselenRal dwedma ones
ran®�e fiom2.484 square het
to 515 s m ket
Lticehiorrem ofa 275-room
201.498 square-foot hotel on
14.3 acres. Amenities mclode a
$ Newmrt Dunes Fkdel 11316ack 6av Drive codee shoo.erksundry shoo
- b�mess center fenrtum mom )
sna/Shress Sri l�sgy�ynt.
cool tcmu count sand
Final .December 2017 2-56 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Table 4-1 [continued]
Cumulative Projects List
Location Pnaposed Land Lke
Construction ofa 70,295 squaw-
foot,4story Ocean Literacy
Facility. This project would
600 Fast Bay,209 include removal 463-metered Application
53 Faybt0cean3 Whsbngton Street,600 and space surface padarg lot, subnmted April
608 Balboa Avenue,and construction of388 spaces; 2014. On hod per
200 Palm,Newport Beach contraction ofa 141,000 applicants request.
square-foot,5-level offsite
parking structure and 6,500
square-foratfloatingclassrusam.
Redevelopment project rtnnNbg Approved.
a rrmced-use watcrfiom project Axndrnenrs
This project would construct a proposed Site
300 Fast Coast Hovay drysnekboat storage facilely farIkveborten[
64 Lek Bay fandmg Alewpon Beady 140 boars,61,534 square feet of Reviewand
visianserving retail and sul
recreational marine facil8ies, Ikvebomen[
and up b 49 attached residential PenrManticmated
units. to be ma][ 2018.
Cdy of IJevvport Beach public
access andhansientdockand
expansion ofbalboa marina
201 East Coast 15ghsory, including 14,252 square ket of
Z� Balboa lvhrma West Expansion Newport Beach restaurant,12 transient boat Approved.
slips,26 24 private boat slips,
664 square ket ofmaina
restroom,and recontguration of
a 294-strace variant lot.
720 West BayAwnue,800
West Bay Avenue,711-721 Construction of a 23,163 square- t
84 Newport lfarlwrYacht Club West BayAwarin,and foot yacht Club Facility. �ve
nano Balboa Boulevard, rder
Niwcrrtpeach Construction.
Development of 'm
re
rs60 000sq t Awniasg Orasta
plisisrattBeft 9 Developew
Pomak Aptawval
st 15.Suee Refiabishoson oreepheamest of On hsdafdse
49 Center pleaprat Beach saare the IA4esn NeW.4 Comanam5 direction Bribe
Center
Wdenmg ofwestbound West
Intersection ofONNewport Coast Fhghway at Old Newport
Old Newport BoukvardRNest 1�d€raewewND
�LZ Coast I-EghwayWdenbg Boulevard and West Coast Boulevard to accommodate a draft conrokte.
}Gghway,Newport Beach third through lane,a ngbthmr
let,and a bilm lane.
Final•December 2017 2-57 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Table 4-1 [continued]
Cutnulative Projects List
Nn.I Mme Location Proposed land Ike Stains
Intersection of West Coast Construction of a pedestrian
42S Lower Sunset VcwPark Highway and Superior overcrossmgs,parking,and park CEQA
Bridge,Pang lot and Park Aware,Newport Beach uses 6rkmer Sunset View determination TBn
Park
Balboa Island Seawne BaOwa Island,Newport Newseawafi along the Grand Awaiting Cry's
434 Reconstruction Beach Canal and on the west end of Requestfor
Balboa Island. Pro sal
Newport Boulevardnorthof Drvcrtdryweatherflows fiwn
10 Aches Strom Drain Hglmuy,ain Diversion Coast west and cast stormdmms CEQA
,Newport Beach (subwatersheds)to the sanitary demmurration TM..
sewers tent
Big Canyon,downstteamof
43 Jamboree Road and south Divert dry weather flows from Final MVDin
11 Big Canyon Rehab Project ofBig Canyon Creek, the creek into a brneactor. Progress.
MmpoftBeach
Replaces deterioratmgweter
46 Bay Crossings Water hhm Newport Harbor,Newport mansrrtssbn rrems prnsuantu 12 Replacement Beach the Wirier Mrstcr Planand Bay CEQA CEQA atron.I13D.
Crossing Water Transrtgsion
Study.
Constmctunofan
47 I1VC Preschool 745 Beach Er I]ive,Igeaport Emaronmenml INatu a Center CFQA d'
13 Beach Preschool CI:QAExe°400°'
48 Park Avenue Bridge Balboa Island,Newport ReplacementofParkAveme, Under
14 Replacement Beach Bridge. constmctrw.
Constmceon of83 single-unit
residences,private sheets,
common open space,and
49 landscaping. ProposedZaning AbPesvedJder
Ebb Tide 1560 Placentia Rive, Code Amendment fromMrltiple-
]5 Newport Beach Lbd Residential(RM m Planned dam'
Cournamity(PC). APlanned
Conummdy Development Plan is
proposed.
Conshuctionofa 130-room
3300 Newport Boulevard upscale hotel. General Plan
16 lido House Hotel and475 32m Street, Amendment,Coastal land Use Under
Plan Amendment,and Zoning construction.
Newport Beach Amendment m change zoning
from Public Facilities m Vision.
Construction Of four a CEQAexempa:a.
(two buildings,tluee-level
2131,2 estc lfDri and parking ApprovedDourclifien
2-L 11 WestclA'Nhdsal 213pod:Befi9'Diue, budding)
Newport Beach existing bet with)382spaces of issue Undcr
square feet with . spaces of
off-stgeet a donshuctrvn.
Final .December 2017 2-58 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Table 4-1 [continued]
Cumulative Projects List
Location Proposed Land Use Status
Budding perun
approval;pendin
Consaucton of23 attached raeorchtienef-haet
22 Lido Mbs 3303 and 3355 Vn Iido, dppe-smrymwnhome wap exoned.
I8 Newport Beach rondonnum. Application. CLUP
Amendment and
CIA'application
apponed.
Amendment to the Noah
Newport Center Planned
Comnunily(WCPC)increasing
leas Fas'hi�n]stand fFmmnedv the msidcntinl dcvclopment
23 1101 San Joaquin Fills allocation with the MJCPC from Under
San Joaquin Pla
2 ceApamre ) Road Newport Beach 524 dwelling units(ia of consmtion
524 dwelling ands(increase
tc
e of
94 units)and allocating the units
m the San Joaquin Plate sub-
area.
10 Big Canyon loft Canyou Newport Rough grading fir development Approved Not yet
20 Beach oft,single-family residence. constructed.
Ear
23 Aleupert Reach&may Club 1600 Past Coast1 IgIvae test gatfolubhouie and ane4a,3 Uder
its Plewpert Reach Ikeilities neluding a eant barn eenanuctien
ON Newport GPAProject Newport,Boulevard,
328,332 and 340 Old Approved.
24 Construction of25,000 square- Demobbon and
21 Newport Beach trot medical office buddin& grading peanuts are
issued.
Reallocation oftyi to 225,000
27 Hoag PhmorialHaspital 1 HDa Drim n square fiet ofprevi usly
22 Presbyterian Nbster Plan Beach approved(but not conshucted) Approved
Update Project square Rootage from the Inver
Campus to the Upper Campus.
Construction of8 residential
condominium units and
28 AERIE Project 301-207 Carnation Avenue replace""reconfigaatbn, Under
2} and 101 Bayside Place, and expansion ofthe existing construction.
gangcayplatixm,pier—L—y,
and dock facrlm"es.
Units Waiting appsemwAteb
295,232 not sq
Santa wes mess
29 Alandian(Saum efFas Island,and IM sgxme feet ofstibunnusean Undler
Condefflinurs proset Santa-Barbara
Beach
201 padang spaces ansite,
an space .a
Final•December 2017 2-59 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Table 4-1 [continued]
Cumulative Projects List
Name I Location I Proposed Land Ike Status
square feet atonal and oee
nSeS
City of Costa Musa 4
hnprownents to lions Park
newsignage,library building, IS/NM ublr
Lions Park,570 West 18n and cafe;and renovation and P
24 Lion Park PmecO Street,1945 and 1855 Pads repmposing ofthe existing nevewporiod
ended Iv6roh 4,
Avenue,Costa M;sa Donald Umgan Librarybuildm' g 2017.
to the 14ugirbodrood Conmmunly
Center.
Proposes a newrrivd-use
development. Phase Ihas ISM�DAddendum
32 Weststle Lofts Mxed-U a 1640 Morom Avenue, corsnucted a 185-unt assisted Prepared lulP
25 DevebpnentPrqject Costa M:sa livmgfachy. Phase Hv uld
corstmct42,000square Eetof 2016.
cormnercialollice uses.
NoRs:
1. Rekrro Fxhbl4-1,Qarubtoe PmiectLosafions.
2. CkyofN%wpWBeach,Ca ihfiw Pmjecs Lis�hUp9Av ..me partheachca.gov/PhCEQACanxilafiw/cmmilafiw-pmjem_erneupdt
accessed Mmh 27,2017.
3. Forprojecrs wdlr nnllple addresses,the address wih the nearestpmavMyro the pmject sie was depicted in DdaM 41.
Witten Cones nce:Moo Ashy ' PrincicalPlanam City-£Costa bksa Mmh 27 2017.
5-14 Refer to Response 5-10,above.
5-15 Comment noted. Section 5.91 Iond Use and Relmant PlannnZ DEIR page 5.9-8, second
paragraph,has been revised as follows:
The City's LCP and associated Coastal Land Use Plan(CLUP)were appreved certified by the
CCC on September 8, ^_^_'-_- Tanuary 13. 2017,and are eapeeted to beeame became effective
is on ian rare 1.2017. The CLUP sets forth goals,objectives,and policies that govern the
use of land and water in the coastal zone within the City of Newport Beach and its sphere of
influence consistent with the General Plan. The City's CLUP identifies the Coastal Act coastal
resources planning and management policies that are relevant to Newport Beach. The CLUP
addresses Coastal Act policies within three chapters: Land Use and Development; Public
Access and Recreation;and Coastal Resource Protection. Each section or subsection begins
with the identification of the Coastal Act sections that are relevant to Newport Beach,
followed by a narrative of the local setting and policy direction adopted by the City to address
the requirements of the Costal Act and a listing of specific policies.
5-16 Refer to Response 5-11,above.
Final .December 2017 2-60 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
5-17 Comment noted. DEIR pages 5.2-6 and 5.10-6,Tables 5.2-2 and 5.10-2 SensiSve Rerebtorrhave
been revised as follows:
Table 5.2-2
Sensitive Receptors
Approximate Orientation
Distance from Project locadon/lbscription
from Project Site
Site(feet)
25 North Single Faruh,Residences
Residential Res d ndiallkes 25 Fast Single Family Resid races
25 South Single Fanaly Res es
50 Pest Siagle F Residences
Ebmb Myatt RegencyTI VABeach 3,705 East 1107 Jamboree Road
Balboa Inn 5,269 Soto 105 twain Street
Tbeport Had.High School 1,925 Tkedroest 600 Lwe Aeenw
}brace Ensign mtemedinte School 2,765 Nrffi..t 20DOCffDriw
Roper Elementary School 4,546 Tbah 452 E 18lh Street Costa Nbsa
Scboob Nhrmers Mk.=,y School 4,785 North 2100 harmers Drin,
Tbnport Elementary School 4,850 Sornhaest 1327 West Balboa Bmkvmd
Children's CerrkrHythe Sea 4,910 Satllmest 1400%atSoban Boulevard
Tovport Itigfas Momentary 4,981 Tkandmest 300E 15th Street
Tbvport Harbor Lutheran Church 910 North 798 Diner Dries
Places St Andreas Presbyterian Church 2,047 Tkmhuest 600 St Ad..Road
W.hipf St JohnVamey Chapel 4,480 Southeast 314 hbrme Aron
Ka h p
Ctuist Cmmh by the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 NkstHe@oa Boulevard
OrufadyofM&mt Carrel Church 5,172 Sund.,t 1441 Nkst Lulhoa Boulehard
Hospitals Tbw ABay Hospkal 1,265 Tbrth 1501 East 16b Street
libraries Babes Blanch Lbmty 4,277 South 100 East Rehm Boulevard
Mainers Hatay 5,182 Mail 1300 fivbte kenue
Bob Henry Pam 1,370 North 90ODaer Drice
LuekBayVewPark Southeast Jamboree Road and Paeis Fast Coast
2,904 1Hghway
BackBay Golf&Flaws 3,724 J3artheast 1107 Jambmee Road
Recrearon/Pad¢ Germ Parr 3,791 Nest 2324ia Gen
lbrperPadr 4,546 North 452 E ISth Street,Corm Asa
Gemxk WwPadr 4,750 Nsd at 1554Galaxy Drim
Pbkley Pads 4,794 Nartbwest 360 Ogle Street,Casco bbsa
CtiffGbe Park 4,940 Northwest 298 Rbersile Aacmae
I a:
1. I2smrcxs are veaswedfiwvtlx exrehur ' oleo avdvat fiommdrvNualc®savcoov ' era/areas wvhntlte mkrix ofrhe 'crate.
Source: Goo kFartlh,201].
Final .December 2017 2-61 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Table 5.10-2
Sensitive Receptors
Approximate Orientation
Name Distance from Project from Project Incadon/lescripdon
Site
Site(feet)
25 Nonh Staple Family Residences
ResBentet ResHentiallhes 25 Fast Single F.miy Residences
25 South Single F.milv Residences
50 Nest Single Fa Residences
Hotels Myatt RegeteyTb VABeach 3,705 Fast 1107 Jamboree Road
faaoe Inn 5,269 South 105 khm Sneet
bkaport Harbor High School 1,925 Nadnuest 600 kvim Avenue
Horace Ensign aremedate School 2,765 Nalhuest 2000 C1ffDrw
Iarper ElementarySchool 4,546 N & 452 E IBth Street Costa hksa
Schools harmers Fk.=,y School 4,785 North 2100 harmers Dd.
beaport Elementary School 4,950 Soudw.est 1327 West laboa Boubrard
Ctnlmen's Center By the Sea 4,910 Southoxst 1400 West Balloon Boukvatd
.xkapon Heights Elementary 4,981 bbalroest 300E 15th Street
bkaport Harbor lndean Church 910 North 798 Dover Dose
Places St Andreas Presbyterian Church 2,047 Nina t 600 St Andmas Road
W.hipf St John Yiamey Chapel 4,480 Southeast 314 hbn.Asetee
hp
Christ Qnumh byre Sea 4,910 Southwest 1401 Nkstlaaoa Boulevard
Our lady 41,bunt Camel Cbmch 5,172 Sowff .est 1441 Nest Halho.B.15ond
Hospitals Newport Bay Hospital 1,265 hiumb 1501 East lath Street
BnAbre Pnmch Lbtary 4,277 South 100 East Balboa Boulevard
lbem6
Mounts Iil>rary 5,182 Idortln 1300 Lwa Aaeme
Bob Henry Pad: 1,370 Dbuln 900Arver Drve
ElackBayVewPa,k Southeast Jamboree Road and Pss&Fast Coast
2,904 HO—Y
HackB.y Gulf&Furness 3,724 Maheast 1107 Jamboree Road
Recrearon/Padcs Genoa Park 3,791 West 232 Na Gems
HoperPark 4,546 Nall 452 E I81h Sheet Corm hesa
Caaxk WwParr 4,750 NbNneast 155 S!xv`Dn.x-
PmMeyParc 4,794 Nbaraest 3600ge Street Cosa bbsa
CtiffGhe Park 4,; Jdwriwest 298 Rherside Aaetrue
No a:
1. Ilisarces are rreaswed fiemtlbe exaror ' aboada sM wtfirnn mdivaalcorarucnon ' ca/areae xnbn fire varix ofrhe ' ware.
Source: Cuogk FaM,2017.
5-18 Mitigation Measure AES-2 on DEIR page 1-2 has been revised,as noted within Response 5-
3. DEIR page 2-14 does not exist and DEIR page 3-2 is an exhibit. DEIR pages 3-16 and 3-
17 discusses permits and approvals, and the City's Site Development Review process is cited
as a required permit/approval. As such,no further response is necessary.
5-19 This comment is a closing statement providing contact information for questions. This
comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No
further response is necessary.
Final .December 2017 2-62 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
5-20 The commenter attached an updated cumulative projects list,which has been incorporated as
part of Response 5-13. Thus,no further response is necessary.
Final .December 2017 2-63 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
This page intentionally left blank.
Final .December 2017 2-64 Responses to Comments
COMMENT LETTER 6
C PubhcWorks is-
August Integrity, Accountability, Service, Trust
Shane L.Silsby, Director
2,2017 NCL-16-043
Kevin Hadden, Principal Staff Analyst
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Notice of Availability for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains
Replacement Project
Dear Mr. Hadden:
The County of Orange has reviewed the Notice of Availability for the Bay Bridge Pump Station
and Force Mains Replacement Project and has no comments at this time. We would like to be
advised of any further developments on the project. Please continue to keep us on the
distribution list for future notifications related to the project.
S' el y,
Richard Vuo anager,Pla ' ton
OC Public Works Service Area/OC Development Services
300 North Flower Street
Santa Ana, California 92702-4048
Richard.Vuong@ocpw.ocgov.com
300 N.Flower Street.Santa Ana.CA 92703 ww,v.orqublicworks.com
P.O.Box 4048,Santa Ana,CA 927024048 714.667.8800 1 Inb@OCPW.ocgov.com
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pmup Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 6
Richard Vuong,Manager,Planning Division
Orange County Public Works
August 2,2017
6-1 This letter acknowledges that the Orange County Public Works received and reviewed the
DEIR and has no comments. The commenter requests continued communication of further
developments and future notifications related to the project. No further response is necessary.
Final .December 2017 2-66 Responses to Comments
COMM LETTER 7
From: Rivers,Tamy[mailto:TamyRivers@ocfa.org]
Sent:Tuesday,July 25,2017 7:29 AM
To:CEQA<cega@ocsd.com>
Subject:Draft Environmental Impact Report- Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
To whom it may concern:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject document.Orange County Fire Authority has no comments.
Tannera Rivers
Management Analyst
`yl Orange County Fire Authority
Office: 714-573-6199
We visualize problems and solutions through the eyes of those we serve.
t
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 7
Tamera Rivers,Management Analyst
Orange County Fire Authority
July 25,2017
7-1 This letter acknowledges that the Orange County Fire Authority received and reviewed the
DEIR and has no comments. No further response is necessary.
Final .December 2017 2-68 Responses to Comments
COMMENT LETTER 8
From:ALRON7099@aol.com [mailto:alron70999aoLcom]
Sent:Thursday,June 22,2017 5:23 PM
To:CEOA<cega@ocsd.com>
CC:Dix, Martin<MDIX(1a OCSD.COM>; msinacori(onewoortbeachca.eov
Subject: BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION
Hello:
I am the property owner at 2888 Bayshore Drive; Newport Beach, CA 92663
Could you please tell me exactly how this might impact my property(both land side and water side)as we are
reconfiguring the marina, and bringing in new power and a transformer to our north property side?
I look forward to hearing from you
Thank you,
Allyson Presta, partner
PALMOINVESTMENTS, GP
phone 949-759-1275
fax 949-759-1288
mobile 949-874-1725
email:ALRON7099(a)AOL.COM
or accounting(o)orestaorooerties.com
t
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 8
Allyson Presm,Partner
Palen Investments,GP
June 22,2017
8-1 This commenter requests additional information pertaining to project implementation and
potential impact to the property located at 2888 Bayshore Drive and the property's planned
improvements. The DEIR analyzes temporary and permanent impacts within the existing
OCSD easement adjacent to the 2888 Bayshore Drive property. Construction activities
associated with this project are not anticipated to occur on the 2888 Bayshore Drive property.
The project is not anticipated to result in any potential conflicts with planned improvements
on the 2888 Bayshore Drive property. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy
or involve an environmental issue. Thus,no further response is necessary.
Final .December 2017 2-70 Responses to Comments
COMMENT LETTER 9
GAE)RIELENOBANDOFMISSIONINDIAN5-KIZI-1NATION
historically known as Tbc San Ga6nel E)and of Mission Indiana
"7 recognized 69 t6e jtate of California as the aboriginal tn6e of the Los Angeles basin
Orange County
Sanitation District
July 18, 2017
Re: AB52 Consultation request for the Bay Bridge Pump station and Force mains replacement
project located: 300 East Coast Highway
Dear Kevin Hadden,
Please find this letter as a written request for consultation regarding the above-mentioned project
pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1, subd. (d). Your project lies within our ancestral
tribal territory, meaning descending from, or a higher degree of kinship than traditional or
cultural affiliation. Your project is located within a sensitive area and may cause a substantial
adverse change in the significance of our tribal cultural resources. Most often, a records search
for our tribal cultural resources will result in a'no records found"for the project area. The Native
American Heritage Commission, ethnographers, historians, and professional archaeologists can
only provide limited information that has been previously documented about California Native
Tribes. This is the reason the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) will always refer the
lead agency to the respective Native American Tribe of the area because the NAHC is only aware of
general information and are not the experts on each California Tribe. Our Elder Committee &
tribal historians are the experts for our Tribe and are able to provide a more complete history
(both written and oral) regarding the location of historic villages, trade routes, cemeteries and 9-1
sacred/religious sites in the project area. Therefore, to avoid adverse effects to our tribal cultural
resources,we would like to consult with you and your staff to provide you with a more complete
understanding of the prehistoric use(s) of the project area and the potential risks for causing a
substantial adverse change to the significance of our tribal cultural resources.
Consultation appointments are available on Wednesdays and Thursdays at our offices at 901 N.
Citrus Ave. Covina, CA 91722 or over the phone. Please call toll free 1-844-390-0787 or email
gabrielenoindians'Jayahoo.com to schedule an appointment.
.. Prior to the first consultation with our Tribe, we ask all those individuals participating in the
consultation to view a video produced and provided by CalEPA and the NAHC for sensitivity and
understanding of AB52. You can view the video at: http://nahc.ca.gov/2015/12/ab-52-tribal.
training/
With Respect,
Andrew Sales, Chairman
Albers P•,�,r.uw.=.I M.nb.G-1-L=— II Kj.F.nlr�.... C6r. dd6C..rca.lf WI
PO 15.395,C�.a.CA 917+1 www.gabdelenoindians.org ga6rielenoindians0ya600.com
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 9
Andrew Salas,Chairman
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation
July 18,2017
9-1 This comment from the Gabrielino Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation requests
consultation with OCSD in accordance with AB 52. However, as discussed on pages 5.12-2
and 5.12-3 of the DEIR, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation and OCSD
completed the AB 52 consultation process in early 2017. Based on the DEIR,impacts related
to tribal cultural resources were determined to be less than significant with implementation of
recommended mitigation. Thus,no further response is necessary.
Final .December 2017 2-72 Responses to Comments
COMMENT LETTER 10
IRVINE COMPANY
Since 1864
August 3, 2017
Kevin Hadden, Principal Staff Analyst
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)- Bay Bridge Pump Station
Draft Environmental Impact Report Comments
Dear Mr. Hadden:
Irvine Company appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the Bay Bridge Pump Station
Draft Environmental Impact Report(DEIR). Irvine Company previously submitted a comment letter,
dated December 8, 2016, during the review period for the Notice of Preparation and Initial
Study/Environmental Checklist which included a number of concerns related to the proposed
alignment of the new dual force mains and the proposed work areas on the Balboa Marina parking
lot, among others. During subsequent meetings between Irvine Company, OCSD and other parties,
Irvine Company requested that the DEIR analyze a project that would traverse the Back Bay Landing
site and cross the Newport Bay channel north of Coast Highway in order to reduce impacts to Balboa
Marina. We note that the proposed project identified in the DEIR is for the northern alignment of the
pump station and force mains, of which Irvine Company is generally supportive.
The Conceptual Site Plan in the DEIR presents a project that is significantly improved with a
northern alignment (north of Coast Highway) for the dual force main placement and channel
crossing, the relocation of the pump station 300' northeast of the existing pump station location, and
the identification of alternative work areas that will not impact the Balboa Marina project site. This
alignment provides significantly fewer impacts to Irvine Company property. We do note that the
originally proposed alignment south of Coast Highway is included as a project Alternative in the
DEIR and do not support that Alternative for the reasons stated in our meetings and our comment
letter of December 8, 2016.
We would like to take this opportunity to comment on additional components of the proposed project
and request additional information or clarification on the following:
I. Construction Schedule - While the DEIR does provide construction duration (weeks) for 10-3
some segments of the project, such as gravity sewer improvements, it does not include a
detailed construction schedule. Please provide estimated timeframes for all project
components. We note that the total project timeline is 44 months.
550 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 949.720.2000
Mr. Kevin Hadden
August 3,2017
Page 2 of 2
2. Section 3.3 of the Project Description notes that the existing force mains would be abandoned
once the new pump station facilities are complete. We assume this directly relates to the
existing force mains which run adjacent to and beneath the Balboa Marina parking lot. Please
provide detail about the process for such"abandonment" including the timing for the process, 104
anticipated environmental impacts,and whether any equipment staging on the Balboa Marina
site will be required to effectuate the abandonment.
3. With respect to the issue of the sewer lines on Balboa Marina property, the DEIR does not
identify the impacts that will occur on the Balboa Marina site related to the existing sewer
lines. In recent correspondence with Adam Nazaroff, OCSD Project Manager, Mr. Nazaroff
confirmed that no provision has been made to address the impact on Balboa Marina if the
existing sewer must be redesigned and installed in order to reach Bayside Drive before
connecting to a City sewer. We appreciate Mr. Nazaroff's coordination and look forward to
meeting with OCSD to discuss this issue on August 15.
We request that the Responses to Comments identify the potential significant impact to 10.5
Balboa Marina and provide an analysis of the proposed sewer system and how it impacts the
existing sewer serving the marina. We are concerned that impacts will be extensive and may
include the need to build a new on-site sewer system to take the discharge from the existing
Balboa Marina, Yacht Broker office, marina restrooms, SOL restaurant and the future Balboa
Marina restaurant to Bayside Drive. Based on engineering review, it appears that the
proposed on-site system will be lower than the existing or proposed sewer on Bayside Drive
requiring additional equipment in order to connect to OCSD's sewer. Please note that once
we have met with OSCD,we anticipate submitting additional comments.
We appreciate OCSD's communication and coordination with Irvine Company over the past two
years and are pleased with the new alignment analyzed in the DEIR. Thank you in advance for your 10.6
responses to the above-requested information.
Sincerely,
RVfNE COMPANY
Dan Miller
Sr. Vice President
Entitlement and Public Affairs
c: Shawn Schaffner, CAA Planning, Inc.
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 10
Dan Miller,Senior Vice President
Irvine Company
August 3,2017
10-1 This is an introductory comment that summarizes a comment letter provided by the Irvine
Company during the review period for the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the proposed
project. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental
issue. As such,no further response is necessary.
10-2 This comment includes a summary of the project description and notes that the Irvine
Company is not supportive of the "Existing Pump Station Site Rehabilitation" alternative
presented in Section 7.0,ABemafives to the Proposed Pro eet. This comment is noted;since it does
not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue, no further response is
necessary.
10-3 The proposed project conservatively assumes a total of 44 months for the completion of
construction,and the analysis of the DEIR related to air quality,noise,traffic,and other topical
areas is similarly considered to be conservative in nature. While durations for primary
components of the construction process have been estimated with the DEIR, a detailed
construction schedule for all project components would be determined during Final Design,
and shared by OCSD with affected stakeholders and property owners. This comment does
not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further
response is necessary.
10-4 The existing force mains that traverse the Balboa Marina property and cross the Newport Bay
Channel would be abandoned in place and filled with slurry. This method of abandonment
would minimize potential impacts (ground disturbance, trenching, etc.) to the Balboa Marina
and Newport Bay Channel. The existing force mains would be filled and abandoned following
completion and operation of the new force mains. Equipment and activities associated with
abandonment of the existing force mains would occur within areas previously analyzed in the
DEIR,and would not affect the Balboa Marina property.
10-5 Refer to Response 5-2,above.
10-6 This comment is a closing statement. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy
or involve an environmental issue. No further response is necessary.
Final .December 2017 2-75 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
This page intentionally left blank.
Final .December 2017 2-76 Responses to Comments
COMMENT LETTER 11
'am" aaa4
',onm¢nUl3p Y ,
SoCalGas Sa era CsympraGan Company
Sempra Fner®'a 17U
G lrFl
555 FlM 81ree1
A Sempra Energy malty lasanples,ea.SKI13
W: 213244581r
Fin:323 518 2324
08/04/2017
Mr.Kevin Hadden
Principal Staff Analyst
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,CA 92708
Re:Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Dear Mr.Hadden:
Southern California Gas Company(SoCalGas)appreciates the opportunity to review and respond to the Bay Bridge
Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project.SoCalGas understands that the proposed project would replace
the existing Bay Bridge pump station and associated force mains and include improvements to the pump station,the
Newport Bay Channel crossing force main and the West Coast Highway crossing force main.Activities for the
pump station improvements would involve construction of new pump station facilities and replacement of several
portions of the existing OCSD gravity sewer system.Activities for the force main improvements would involve 114
construction of 3,985 linear feet of force mains for the Newport Bay channel crossing to connect the new pump
station to the existing OCSD force main system,and further force main alignment extension to connect the an
existing OCSD valve vault near West Coast Highway.We respectfully request that the following comments be
incorporated in the administrative record.
• SoCalGas has a 5-inch distribution pipeline that runs along the southbound lanes of North Bayside Drive at
its intersection with East Coast Highway,and a medium pressure distribution line that runs along the 113
eastbound on State Highway 1 just beginning after the Bay Bridge.
• SoCalGas recommends that the project proponent call Underground Service Alert at 811 at least two
business days prior to performing any excavation work for the proposed project.Underground Service
Alert will coordinate with SoCalGas and other Utility owners in the area to mark the locations of buried 11•3
utility-owned lines.
Once again,we appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains
Replacement Project.If you have any questions,please feel free to contact me at(213)244-5817 or 11-4
EnvreviewAwmprautilities.com.
Sincerely,
James Chuang—�
Senior Environmental Specialist
Southern California Gas Company
cc.Jennifer Pezda,SoCalGas
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 11
James Chuang, Senior Environmental Specialist
Southern California Gas Company
August 4,2017
11-1 This is an introductory comment that provides a brief summary of the project description.
This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As
such,no further response is necessary.
11-2 The location of the 5-inch distribution pipeline and the medium pressure distribution line are
noted along the southbound lanes of North Bayside Drive at its intersection with East Coast
Highway and along the eastbound on State Highway 1 just beginning after the Bay Bridge,
respectively. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an
environmental issue. No further response is necessary.
11-3 This comment recommends that the project proponent contact Underground Service Alert to
mark the locations of buried utility-owned lines. The project contractor would adhere to State
and local regulations including utility coordination prior to construction.
11-4 This comment is a closing statement providing contact information for questions. This
comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No
further response is necessary.
Final .December 2017 2-78 Responses to Comments
COMMENT LETTER 12
ATTORNEVSATLAW
1 NOSSAMAN LAP 18101 Von Karman Avenue
Suite 1800
Irvine.CA 92612
T 949.833.7800
F 949 833.7878
VIA EMAIL AND U.S. MAIL John P. Erskine
0 949.477.7633
jerskine@nossaman.cum
Refer To File is 400244-0001
August 4, 2017
Kevin Hadden, Principal Staff Analyst
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
Email: CEQA(d)OCSD.com
Re: Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and
Force Main Project (Project No. SP-178)
Dear Mr. Hadden:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the Orange County Sanitation District ("OCSD")
Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR")for the Bay Bridge Pump Station ("BBPS") and
Force Main Project("the Project").
As noted in Section 3.0 Project Description of the DEIR, the Project is proposed to be
relocated on approximately 10,000 square feet of the 31.4 acre Back Bay Landing Project ("BBL
Project") near the entrance to our client's property, approximately 300 feet northeast of the
pump station's current location on East Coast Highway. 12-1
The following comments are primarily focused on compatibility of the Project with the
BBL project, particularly as it pertains to OCSD's Regulatory Review and Permitting Schedule
and Construction and Disassembly/Site Restoration Schedule and Process. We are also
providing several needed corrections to the Project Description and requests for additional
clarification of the exact nature of various components of the Project.
Our comments are as follows:
1.3 Goals and Objectives
OCSD should explain the relationship between the "peak wet weather flow conveyance 12 2
capacity" and the increase in the BBPS from 16 MGD to 18.5 MGD.
If the existing BBPS location poses a safety issue in terms of the current direct access
from East Coast Highway (as described in Goals and Objectives#3), how will the "Existing
Pump Station Site Rehabilitation Alternative" avoid significant conflicts with access through the 12-3
BBPS project from Bayside Drive, similar to the safety issues currently experienced at the East
Coast Highway access point?
56116a40.0
nossaman.com
Augus14, 2017
Page 2
3.2.1 Project Setting (Existing Conditions Project Description Issues)
The proposed BBPS (relocation) site is "disturbed," but to be clear should be described
as a fully improved and partially paved facility, providing storage for RV's and trailered boats, as
well as parking for the Bayside Village Marina, a coastal-dependent use. The site also includes 12.4
areas leased for kayak and SUP rentals and launching, and parking for and access to Pearson's
Port Fish Market.
As commented below, the proposed OCSD project, which includes construction staging
areas, as well as unidentified additional staging areas that are foreseeably needed, will create 12.5
significant disruption of the current BBL recreational and marine commercial uses and our
proposed BBL Project.
3.3 Project Characteristics
The Project's new pump station facility was previously identified in the Notice of
Preparation issued on November 10, 2016, as being located on approximately 9,500 square
feet to accommodate a state-of-the-art odor control facility and other equipment. The current
proposal is for the facility to be on 10,000 square feet. Could OCSD construct the necessary
facilities and equipment on a smaller footprint, including partial or complete undergrounding of
pump station equipment and has this been done on other pump stations in California? Could
the two 10-foot diameter tanks included in the vapor-phase odor control system be
undergrounded? Pg 3-10 provides an indication that the proposed pump station building would 12-6
include features, architecture, and screening consistent with the Back Bay Landing Planned
Community Development Plan (PCDP), and Section 5.1 Aesthetics (pg. 5.1-17) states that the
new pump station structures would be required to be generally consistent with the BBL PCDP.
We would expect that all of the project components be completely consistent with the PCDP,
and request that Mitigation Measure AES-Z be modified to include concurrent submittal of
design plans to both the City Community Development Director, and to BBL representatives for
review and approval.
3.4 Construction
Construction of the proposed Project is scheduled to take almost four(4) years,
exclusive of demolition /disassembly of the existing pump station and site cleanup. Can
construction be expedited and how long will the disassembly process take (the DER does not 12-7
describe this process or the timeline for same)?
Pump Station Improvements and Force Main Improvements generally describe
construction activities that require significant, long-term disruption of current and proposed uses
on the BBL Project site, the City's Castaways Park, Pearson's Port Fish Market in the County
tidelands area of the Newport Harbor Channel, as well as lane closures on East Coast Highway
and Bayside Drive. Please provide more specific information on impacts created by: 12-8
— 80,000 sq. ft. of staging area (Exhibit 3-6) and potential impacts to marina access
and parking;
— 20,000 sq. ft. of Castaway's Park;
56118840.0
August 4,2017
Page 3
— Additional temporary construction easements needed for heavy equipment
associated with microtunneling that will occur on the bayfront and potential
impacts to Pearson's Port, our existing kayak and SUP rental businesses, public
access to tidelands area, marina gangways and docks, etc.;
— Impacts to street parking currently available on Bayside Drive caused by 12-8
expected lane closures;
Additional staging areas west of the staging area shown in Exhibit 3-6 needed
during the relocated pump station buildings construction.
This Construction section 3.4 (see also 5.2-12) does not provide sufficient clarity with
respect to full remediation of the existing pump station and force mains. OCSD must clarify that
all existing facilities, including the existing force mains and particularly the existing pump station 12-9
facility will be removed and a fully remediated, compacted site clean to residential standards, be
provided.
5.11 Traffic
As outlined above, the potential four-and-a-half year occupation of the BBL Project site
will not only disrupt existing uses but proposed project development of the BBL Project. In
addition, lane closures, particularly on Bayside Drive, will adversely impact access to existing
recreational and marine commercial businesses.
Traffic Mitigation Measure TRA-1 (pg. 5.11-6) requires OCSD to prepare a Construction
Management Plan ("CMP")to be submitted for review and approval by OCSD's Director of 12-19
Engineering, containing fairly standard and non-specific elements. TRA-1 should be expanded
and should identify, prior to issuance of construction permits, identification of specific lane
closures, as well as timing and duration of same, identification of all OCSD-related construction,
engineering and management parking, alternative BBL Project site access, and, a requirement
that the CMP be provided to and reviewed by the BBL Project representatives and reviewed and
approved by the City of Newport Beach Public Works Director.
Thank you for your review and response on these comments. 12-11
Sincere)
J P. Erskine
of Nossaman LLP
JPE:dif
56118840.0
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 12
John Erskine
Nossaman LLP
August 4,2017
12-1 This is an introductory comment that provides a brief project description and summary of the
nature of the comments provided in the letter. This comment does not address the DEIR's
adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such,no further response is necessary.
12-2 Since 2003 OCSD has conducted several studies evaluating hydraulics within the Newport Force
Main Network(NFMN). OCSD's TerbniealMemorandum No. 3 HydraulirAnessment,prepared by
Malcom Pimie, Inc., dated December 2010 (2010 Hydraulic Assessment) documents the
hydraulic assessment of current and future NFMN configuration and flows,identifying hydraulic
deficiencies and recommending solutions to contain flows within the collection system under
both normal and adverse operating conditions. Based on the 2010 Hydraulic Assessment,
current peak wet-weather flows for the Bay Bridge pump station is 16.9 MGD and projected
peak wet weather flows for year 2030 is 18.5 MGD. The 2010 Hydraulic Assessment concluded
that the Bay Bridge Pump Station is hydraulically deficient under all existing and future scenarios
for peak wet-weather flow conditions and recommended upsizing the pump station to convey
year 2030 peak wet-weather flow of 18.5 MGD.
12-3 This comment is related to the safety risk of the existing driveway access to the site as proposed
in the"Existing Pump Station Site Rehabilitation"Alternative. The existing driveway has been
used since the existence of the current site and OCSD has no record of vehicular accidents
with pedestrians or oncoming traffic. OCSD can continue to use the existing site and driveway
access. However, the preferred alternative site off of Bayside Drive contains a reconfigured
pump station that would allow improved maneuverability for OCSD operations and
maintenance vehicles. In addition,traffic volumes along Bayside Drive are considerably lower
than volumes along East Coast Highway.
12-4 Comment noted. DEIR page 3-1,paragraph 3,has been revised as follows:
The proposed pump station would be located on the same 31.4-acre parcel,approximately
300 feet to the northeast. The proposed pump station site is wed fi&
improved and partially paved, and is currently occupied by RV storage facilities, which
includes trailered boats, parking for the Bayside Villaee Marina, parking-and access to
earson's Port Fish Market, area for kayak and stand-up paddleboard (SUPI rentals and
lautulytt and a driveway providing access to the facility. An existing fence that serves as
the northerly boundary of the RV storage facility also bisects the proposed pump station
site in an east/west orientation.
12-5 As explained in DEIR Section 5.9, Land Use and Relevant Panninv, the existing and proposed
pump station sites are located within Planning Area 1 of the PCDP, which is currently
occupied by an RV storage facility, trailered boats, parking for the Bayside Village Marina,
parking and access to Pearson's Pon Fish Market, and an area for kayak and stand-up
paddleboard rentals and launching. Due to the duration and scope of the project,the project
Final .December 2017 2-82 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
may involve some disruption to the current BBL recreation and marine commercial uses.
These impacts would be mitigated to the extent possible by minimizing construction,hauling,
transport,and lane closures during evening hours,holidays,and weekends. The project would
further minimize interference with recreational opportunities in the Newport Channel by
implementing microtunneling processes rather than conventional dredging. Alternate routes
can be provided for access to the west end of the Back Bay Landing property.
12-6 A 10,000 square-foot site is preferred. Facilities can be designed on smaller footprints and
possibly be located underground, but this would add to construction costs, decrease
maintenance access,increase maintenance costs,and decrease equipment reliability. A smaller
site would make the option of relocating the pump station less attractive. OCSD is willing to
submit design plans concurrently with BBL to the City. Please note that OCSD is exempt
from Uniform Building Code review. OCSD is willing to submit plans to BLL for review and
comment.
12-7 Construction can be expedited. OCSD is committed to streamlining and minimizing the
duration of construction activities to the extent possible, but the complexity and scale of the
project would be more expensive and would have greater public impacts (i.e., nighttime
construction activities). Additionally, deconstruction of the existing pump station facility
would occur once the new pump station facilities are completed. OCSD has estimated the
duration of this project component, but a detailed construction schedule for all project
components would be determined during Final Design and shared with affected stakeholders
and property owners.
12-8 The disassembly process can be a minimum of four months. However, it can take a year
longer if the existing pump station deep foundations require removal. Impacts to property
owners and their tenants due to construction easements would be addressed when they are
being negotiated. Specific impacts to street parking on Bayside Drive would be coordinated
with the City of Newport Beach Public Works and advanced communications would be sent
to the surrounding public.
12-9 The project would comply with all Federal, State, and local rules and regulations including
those pertaining to site remediation of hazardous materials,if necessary. The DEIR includes
Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 through HAZ-4, which relate to asbestos-containing materials,
lead-based paints, force main construction, and the discovery of unknown wastes (minor
editorial revisions to HAZ-1,HAZ-2,and HAZ-4 are noted below to provide clarity regarding
the monitoring and reporting process). The existing force mains would be abandoned in place
and filled with slurry to minimize potential impacts to affected properties and the Newport
Bay Channel(refer to Response 10-4,above). The pump station and associated structures are
planned to be removed a maximum of five feet below the ground surface.
Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 on DEIR page 5.7-15 have been
included to provide additional monitoring and reporting clarification. Mitigation Measure HAZ-
1 has been revised as follows:
HAZ-1 Prior to demolition activities, an asbestos survey shall be conducted by an
Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act AHERA and California Division of
Final .December 2017 2-83 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) certified budding inspector to
determine the presence or absence of asbestos containing-materials (ACMs). If
ACMs are located,abatement of asbestos shall be completed prior to any activities
that would disturb ACMs or create an airborne asbestos hazard. Asbestos
removal shall be performed by a State certified asbestos containment contractor
in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)
Rule 1403. Contractors performing ACM removal shall provide evidence of
abatement activities to the Orange County Sanitation District Direerar—a
Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure HAZ-2 on DEIR page 5.7-16 have been
included to provide additional monitoring and reporting darifrcation. Mitigation Measure HAZ-
2 has been revised as follows:
HAZ-2 If paint is separated from budding materials (chemically or physically) during
demolition of the structures,the paint waste shall be evaluated independently from
the building material by a qualified Environmental Professional. If lead-based
paint is found, abatement shall be completed by a qualified Lead Specialist prior
to any activities that would create lead dust or fume hazard. Lead-based paint
removal and disposal shall be performed in accordance with California Code of
Regulation Title 8, Section 1532.1, which specifies exposure limits, exposure
monitoring and respiratory protection, and mandates good worker practices by
workers exposed to lead. Contractors performing lead-based paint removal shall
provide evidence of abatement activities to the Orange County Sanitation District
Difeetef of Engineering.
Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure HAZ-4 on DEIR page 5.7-16 have been
included to provide additional monitoring and reporting clarification. Mitigation Measure HAZ-
4 has been revised as follows:
HAZ-4 If unknown wastes are discovered during construction by the contractor that are
believed to involve hazardous waste or materials,the contractor shall comply with
the following:
• Immediately cease work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant,
and remove workers and the public from the area;
• Notify the Orange County Sanitation District Difeeraf of Engineering
• Secure the area as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District
and
• Notify the Orange County Health Care Agency's Hazardous Materials
Division's Hazardous Waste/Materials Coordinator (or other
appropriate agency specified by the Director of Engineering). The
Final .December 2017 2-84 Responses to Comments
i Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Hazardous Waste/Materials Coordinator shall advise the responsible
parry of further actions that shall be taken,if required.
12-10 As noted above in Response 5-6, Mitigation Measure ITA-1 has been modified to note that
engineering drawings and specifications would be subject to approval by Caltrans and the City
of Newport Beach, in addition to OCSD. Mitigation Measure TRA-1 includes a range of
minimum requirements that would be necessary within the engineering drawings and
specifications, and OCSD acknowledges that additional provisions related to items such as
access and parking (developed in consultation with the City and Caltrans, and based on final
design)may be required. Based on the analysis provided within the DEIR,Mitigation Measure
TRA-1 would reduce short-term project-related traffic impacts to a level below significance.
12-11 This comment is a closing statement. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy
or involve an environmental issue. No further comment is necessary.
Final .December 2017 2-85 Responses to Comments
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
This page intentionally left blank.
Final .December 2017 2-86 Responses to Comments
COMMENT LETTER 13
C.C.RP.A.
�� ry California Cultural Resource Preservation Alliance, Inc.
P.O. Box 54132 An alliance of American Indian and scientific communities working for
Irvine,CA 92619-4132 the preservation of archaeological sites and other cultural resources.
July 8,2017
Kevin Hadden
Principal Staff Analyst
Orange County Sanitation District
Re: Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project Draft Environmental Impact Report
(DEIR)
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the DEIR for the above-mentioned project. We appreciate
that the City of Newport Beach and Orange Sanitation District acknowledges the fact that the City of
Newport Beach has a long cultural history and is culturally sensitive. Based on the information provided 134
in the Cultural Resources Appendix,we agree that the project has a low potential to impact intact
archaeological materials and concur with Mitigation Measure CUL-I.
Sincerely,
Patricia Martz, Ph.D.
President
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 13
Patricia Martz, Ph.D.,President
California Cultural Resources Preservation Alliance,Inc.
July 8, 2017
13-1 This letter acknowledges that the California Cultural Resources Preservation Alliance, Inc.
received and reviewed the DEIR and agrees with the findings related to cultural resources and
recommended Mitigation Measure CUTA in the DEIR. No further response is necessary.
Final .December 2017 2-88 Responses to Comments
COMMENT LETTER 14
From:Rececca Robles[mailto:rebroblesl@gmail.com]
Sent:Wednesday,July 5,2017 9:19 PM
To:CEQA«eqa@ocsd.com>
Subject: Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project DEIR Report
July 5,2017
Kevin Hadden
Principal Staff Analyst
Orange County Sanitation District
Re: Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project Draft Environmental Impact Report(DEIR)
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the DEIR for the above-mentioned project. We appreciate that the City of
Newport Beach and Orange Sanitation District acknowledge the fact that the City of Newport Beach has along cultural
history and was home to our ancestors prior to settlement by Euro-Americans. Based on the information provided in 14-1
the Cultural Resources Appendix,we agree that the project has a low potential to impact intact archaeological materials
and concur with Mitigation Measure CUL-1. In the event that buried cultural materials are discovered during
construction,we wish to be notified.
Sincerely,
1
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 14
Rebecca Robles
United Coalition to Protect Panhe
July 5, 2017
14-1 This letter acknowledges that the United Coalition to Protect Panhe received and reviewed
the DEIR and agrees with the findings related to cultural resources and recommended
Mitigation Measure CUL-1 in the DEIR. OCSD has noted that the United Coalition to
Protect Panhe requested nodfication in the event buried cultural materials are discovered
during project construction. No further response is necessary.
Final .December 2017 2-90 Responses to Comments
3.0 ERRATA
This page intentionally left blank.
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
3.0 ERRATA
Changes to the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) are noted below. A double-underline
indicates additions to the text; strikeout indicates deletions to the text. These changes are considered
minor and editorial in nature, and do not affect the conclusions of the environmental document or
require recirculation of the EIR.
Section 2.0,page 2.8, 1st paragraph
Bark Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9) (adopted FebmM 25. 2014,
Ordinance . 2 1 - A2 11-21
The Bark Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9) (Back Bay Landing PCDP) is
a redevelopment plan involving a mixed-use waterfront project. This project would construct
a dry stack boat storage facility for 140 boats, 61,534 square feet of visitor serving retail and
recreational marine facilities, and up to 49 attached residential units. The Back Bay Landing
PCDP establishes appropriate zoning regulations governing land use and development of the
Planned Community site,consistent with the General Plan and CLUP. The Back Bay Landing
PCDP provides a vision for the land uses on the site, sets the development standards and
design guidelines for specific project approvals at the Site Development Review and
Community Development Plan approval stage, and regulates the long term operation of the
developed site.
Section 3.0,page 3-1,3rd paragraph
The proposed pump station would be located on the same 31.4-acre parcel,approximately 300 feet to
the northeast. The proposed pump station site is wed fully improved and partiall aye ,
and is currently occupied by RV storage facilities, which includes trAered hoats_VatkinP foe the
ayside Village Marina, parking and access to Pearson's Port Fish Market, area for ka ak and stand-
up paddleboaird (SUP) rentals and lannchinv. and a driveway providing access to the facility. An
existing fence that serves as the northerly boundary of the RV storage facility also bisects the proposed
pump station site in an east/west orientation.
Section 4.0,pages 4-2—4-5,Table 4-11 Cumuladve Fwkcts List
Table 4-1
Cumulative Projects List
No.t Name Los.stir Proposed land Use Status
City of MwportBeach2
1 950San 09meme Bra Development of a 100 Pv�parvmei of
R€selen[ayTesr€r
plaessag
E6�,926 metal
2 ,4#ePgtiea BesartenE-Tm$ic
and Service Facility Robe
Identified
etiL
Final .December 2017 3-1 Errata
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Table 4-1 [continued]
Cumulative Projects List
Niel Name Location Proposed Land Use Status IM
Nia Lido to 30-_ souMound through ime alongCoasts
4 FeffwlF said
Il-wbnment ofa mixed-ice
chncmm.with I.771 coLRfeet
oFmtad hux area_one 2.'td7 Mliciated CEOA
j IJilman Sad Inftc 410 and 412 29-Sheet s � fr�ntreg dv�8m. ��e and
theta msid n'al II' o ��rtc
nerve Srmn 2.4R4 sauam fee
2 515
Dcvcbomcnt ofa 275-room
201.49R eauaro-fool hotel on
14.3 acres. Amenities include a
2 Newrart Dunes Hotel 1131 Back BavDrive busieshoaeir,firadrvshoo
- business center,fimc[ion room incormbte.
soa/fihress Facilities restaurant
000L[eon's courts.sand
w
Construction ofa 70,295 square-
foot,4storyOcean Literacy
Facility. This project would
600 Fast Bay,209 include removal of63-metered Applicawn
53 FxplmOcean3 Washington Street,600 and space surface parking lot; submated April
608 Balboa Awnue,and construction of388 spaces; 2014. On hold per
200 Palm.Newport Beach consmretionofa 141,000 applicant's request
square-Hoot,5-levelodsde
parking structure and 6,500
square-Hoot floating classroom
Redevelopment project mwhvrg Approwd.
a cured-use wateriont project. Paeadaients
This project would construct a preposed Sk
300East CoastH�way, dry stackboat storage facildyfor Dewbomcnt
64 Back Bay Iarrding 140 boats,61,534 square feet of Et)kw- nd
Newport Beach vkQor-senmgrelailand QQUW
recreatlonalmarine facilities, Ikvebnment
and up to 49 attached residential Perml anecinated
units. to be Hied in 2018.
CilyofNewport Beach public
access and transient dockand
expansion ofbalboa marina
201 East Coast l iglucay, nchrdmg 14,252 square feet of
3� Balboa Auto West Expansion Newport Beach restaurant, 12 transient boat Appmwd.
slips,26 24 private boat ships,
664 squam feet ofmarda
restroom,and reconfiguration of
a 294-space paddng lot.
Final .December 2017 3-2 Errata
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Table 4-1 [continued]
Cumulative Projects List
No.' Narrw Location Proposed Land Use Status
720 West Bay Avenue,900 AAHiulg(38a�tal
West Bay Avenue,711-721 pawlepanne
86 Newport HadwrYacht Chi West Bay Avenue,and Construction ofa 23,163 squat:- Pam
710-720 Balboa Buulevud, fiwt Yacht Chub Facddy. Under
M rtBeach Constmction.
win
mom resed ins and aneffla
PLm ad Bmumg-Reath S&00IMstCoast 1ighoa °_�ert�t
9 �-h a te' P^rnit A---a:sh
252.3 gross acres -gin
40 Comet t
Fentee
Widening ofwesthound West
Intersection of Old Newport Coast Highway at Old Newport
44Z Old NewportyWilening Boulevard and West Coast Boulevard to acconowdate a 41n�rrevvew�
- Coast Highway Widerrurg draft crmnlete.
I➢ghway,Newport Beach third through lane,aught-rum
pocket and a Inca lane.
Intersection ofWest Coast Construction ofa pedestrian
Iomer Sunset Yew Park overcrossmgs,parimrg,and park CEQA
428 Ridge,Pad*Lot and Park Rghwayand Superior uses for lower Sunset Yew determination IM
Avenue,Newport Beach Park
Balboa,Island Seawdl Baboa Island,Newport Newseawa➢ Cv along the and Awaing Cr/s
439 Reconstruction Beach Canal and on the west end of Request for
Heboa Island sal
Newport Boulevard north of Divert dry weather fleas
from
10 44 Aches Storm Dram Diversion Coast Aghway,Newport west and east storm drams CEQA
Beach (subwetersheds)to the sanitary determination TBD.
sewersystern.
Big Canyon,downstreamof
43 Big CanlDn Rehab Project Jamboree Road and south Divert dry weather Bums from Final NND in
11 ofBig Canyon Creek the creek am a banvacter. Progtess.
Ne Beach
Replaces deteriorating water
44 BayCrossirgs WaterNhir Newport liarbor,Newport na°s°dsnanmamspursuantto CEQA
the Water Aster Plan and Bay
12 Replacement Beach Crossing Water Tmnsmisskn detem®atio°�'
S
Construction ofan
lbvxrAive,Newport Approved 12
� ENC Preschool Beach Envuormwntal Nature Center CEQAF-rTtiDn.
Preschool
49 Park Avenue Ridge Baboa Island,Newport Replacement ofParkAenue Under
14 Replacement Beach Ridge. construction.
Final .December 2017 3-3 Errata
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Table 4-1 [continued]
Cumulative Projects List
NW Name Location Proposed land Use
Construction of83 single-unit
residences,private sheets,
common open space,and
49 1560 Placentia Drive, landscaping. Proposed Zoning Approved Under
15 Ebb TideNev4w Beach Code Amendment from MItiple- constructon.
Unit Residential(RMJ ro Planned
Comatunity(PC). APlznned
Comaunity avelopment Plan is
proposed
Constmcron ofa 130-room
3300Newport Boulevard upscale hotel. General Plan
Lido House Hotel and 47532w Shcet, Mendment,Coastal Land the Under
lb Plan Amendment,and Zoning construction.
Newport Beach Arendment to change zoning
Sum Public Facilities to Visitor.
Construction offourbwldmgs CEQAexemphon.
(two buildings,three-level
2131,2043,2121,and padrnrg structure,and an Approved.
Westclffi'rtigdical 2131 m lkac UivE, Bela-er
1 Newpwtl ach squaw
rg budding)totalingspaesof issued lhuler
square t p with 382 spaces of
off�treet coastructon'
Building pemrit
appse�R�Pon
Construction of23 attached
2.2 3303 and 3355 Via lido, wnhome aap sad.
Lido lh0as Newport Beach condominiums. AnnFcadm.Cli1P
Mendment aM
CDP aontication
a ved.
Arrendment m the North
14ewport Center Planned
Community(MCTC)increasing
Mlas Fashion kland(Fomerly the residential development
24 1101 San Joaquin lffis allocation with the N-7RC from Under
San Joaquin Pbza
14 Apartments] Road,Newport Beach 524 dwelling units ma total easeof wnsmetin.
524 dwelling uniti(increase of
94 unds)and allocating the ants
ro the San Joaquin Plaza sub-
toes.
24 101ig Canyon 10 Big Canyon,Newport Rough goading for developmern Approved. Not yEt
20 Beach ofa single-fintily residence. constructed.
Eexsmctien 451,213s
lade
§� NOMP841308 fasilities insluding a SaA ba eeas8esft a
and
328,332,and 340 OB Approved
;?6 Construction of25,000 square- Dcrmlinon and
21 OBNewport GPAProject Newport Boulevard, foot medical office building. grading Permits ate
Newport Beach issued
Final .December 2017 3-4 Errata
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Table 4-1 [continued]
Cumulative Projects List
Tw Name Proposed land Use
Reallocation ofup m 225,000
27 }bag Nlemorial Hospital I Heag Drive, wPo rt fe square et ofpreviously
22 Presbyterian NtsterPlan Beach approved(but not constructed) Approved
Update Project square footage fromthe Lower
Canons to the UpperCanons.
Conshutbon o1`8 residential
condominium units and
28 AERIE Project 301-207 Canton Avenue replacement,reconfiguration, Under
23 and 101 Bayside Place, and eapans on ofthe existing construction.
gangmypinton4 pierwa8cway,
and(lock facd6ies.
units totaling appmAnote
205,232 net square feet
Santa Barbara Dr v,mea apPw frb 97;n1 gross
A4adan{Sarna-Barbara) ,sacs, A
hinn 1.and _ ea
Unde
Canderainiuma PROJee Santa Barbara Dive,v29 pa In'of
Mmpcat Beae aq
ei
�, ua
nSgd81E feet Olopen space asquare
Atmed JAB
�. .• -
8avalerNrent �iampqrtpoa squa Feet e€re6�and of iee seas&sstra�
USeS
QtyofCbsraNlesa^
Improvements to Ions Paric
uws*-ge,lrbrarybmldmg, IS/NNDpublic
Lions Park,570 West l8b and cak;and renovation and
4 Bons PadrProjects Sheet, 1845 and 1855 Park repurposmg ofthe existing mvewpenod
Boded Nhreh 4,
— AVerme,Costa Nlosa Donald Dungan Unarybmldng 2017.
m the Neighbodiood Community
Center.
Proposes a newm&ed-use
development Phase Mrs 32 Westside Inds Meted-Use 1640 Nbarom Awnue, constructed a 185+md assisted IS/IvNDdendum
Mpare/NID Addy
25 Development Project Costa N6sa Invag bcrtity. Phase Quould 2016.
consumer 42,0(10 square fret of
commercial office uses.
Notes:
L Reform FxhM 4-1 Qamr6dvE Project Leeatina.
2. CdyofNeYWAPeach,CLnmbtive Projectslist,Mry:/hvw.w portbeachw.gobPWCEQAOmmhtk/cunubtaxjmjecrs cuuempd(
accessedb6rch 27,2017.
3. Forpmject;vntlmmdtWle addresses,the address with the nearestproxmtidyto the priectsde was depictedin Fxlubk4l.
Milt,.Codes txe:Mnoo Achb Princ' IPlanner ofCosm Nbsa Nhmh272017.
Final .December 2017 3-5 Errata
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Section 5.0,pages 5.1-11—5.1-12, Subsection B
B. Permitted Height of Structures
1. Building Height
The maximum allowable building height shall be 35 feet for structures with flat roofs and 40
feet for structures with sloped roofs (minimum 3:12 pitch), except as follows:
a) As illustrated on Exhibit 3,BulldingTleagbts,100 feet from back of curb along Bayside Drive
within the eastem portion of Planning Area 1, maximum allowable building height shall
not exceed 26 feet for flat roofs and 31 feet for sloped roofs.
includes public ...-..ess to a functioning public e ng p atfG n may be developed at ..
e)b) Within Planning Area 1, maximum allowable height for any parking structure shall not
exceed 30 feet for flat roofs and 35 feet for sloped roofs.
fj e) All other exceptions to height shall be regulated pursuant to Section 20.30.060.D of the
Municipal Code.
Section 5.0,page 5.1-13, Subsection A
A. Architectural Theme
The developffiefit shag he desig�ed with ft Coastal ?4,&�-ffsfl,sH sfelimee,eal them, 'rhis
are included and recommendations for quality materials and appliestions are provided. Thiel
and textured walls, bull nose borders, terracotta colors with rustic metal and stone details are
The development shall be designed with a Coastal architectural theme This architectural theme
is influenced by the marine climate of the California coastline, with varied historical vernacular
and casually elegant palette, with building forms and massing that define and create unique an
often seamless indoor/outdoor spaces. The project would follow 12rindples of qualily design
exhibiting a high level of architectural standards and shall he comnatihle with the surrounding
area, sensitive to scale_ lamportion_ and identity with a focus on place-making. Massing pffset<
variation of roof lines_ varied textures, openings, recesses, and design accents nn all heilding
elevations shall be provided to enhance the architectural design The intent is not to select a
historically specific or rigid architectural style for the project but to create an active mixed-use
muagt-
Final .December 2017 3-6 Errata
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Section 5.0,page 5.1-16,Mitigation Measure AES-1
AES-1 Prior to issuance of any grading and/or demolition permits, whichever occurs first, a
engineering drawings and specifications shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation District Director of
Engineering. These documents shall,at a minimum,
indicate the equipment and vehicle staging areas, stockpiling of materials, fencing (i.e.,
temporary fencing with opaque material), and haul route(s). Staging areas shall be sited
and/or screened in order to minimize public views to the maximum extent practicable.
Construction haul routes shall minimize impacts to sensitive uses in the project area by
avoiding local residential streets, as feasible.
Section 5.0,page 5.1-17,Mitigation Measure AES-2
AES-2 Prior to construction of the new pump station facility,OCSD shall submit design plans of
the proposed pump station to the City of Newport Beach
Develepmen for review and approval by the Citv's Planning Commission or delegate
aut11>zil for Site Development Review and to determine consistency with the Back Bay
Landing PCDP design guidelines.
Section 5.0,page 5.1-19,Mitigation Measure AES-3
AES-3 All construction-related lighting fixtures (including portable fixtures) shall be oriented
downward and away from adjacent sensitive areas (including residential and biologically
sensitive areas). Lighting shall consist of the minimal wattage necessary to provide safety
at the construction site. A construction safety lighting plan shall be submitted to the
Orange County Sanitation District Difeetaf of Efkgiftee for review and approval prior
to any nighttime construction activities.
Section 5.0,page 5.1-19,Mitigation Measure AES-4
AES-4 Prior to construction of the proposed pump station, the eeneraeter shftH previde lighting
plans shall he nrnvided to the Orange County Sanitation District
or review and annroval_ and to the City of Newport Beach for review and annroval by
the City's Planning Commission for Site Development Review. The lighting plan shall
illesxsting illustrate consistency with the Back Bay Landing PCDP regulations for lighting.
Per these requirements, all outdoor lighting fixtures shall be designed, shielded, aimed,
located, and maintained to minimize impacts to adjacent sites and to not produce glare
onto adjacent sites or roadways.
Final .December 2017 3-7 Errata
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Section 5.0,pages 5.2-6 and 5.10-6,Tables 5.2-2 and 5.10-2, Sensitive Rec¢pmts
Table 5.2-2
Sensitive Receptors
Approximate Orientation
D stance
�Pe i�ne from Project from Projeot Lrcation/Ascription
Sia,if, rn Site
25 I kuth Singb F Restlerczs
Resrlenaal Resvlendal Jkes 25 East Sirwle Fa Residences
25 South S' b Fa ft..o&ees
50 Rbst Single F Residences
Hoteb Hyatt RegencyNkopmt Reach 3,705 East 1107 Jamboree Road
Bal.run 5,269 South 105 hbm Street
Newport Hadwr Jhgh School 1,925 Nnd..t 600 hune Avenue
Homce Ensign hrtemedate School 2,765 Nethwest 2000 CliffDhite
E6ryerElemenmry School 4,546 Meth 452 E l8th Street,Costa hksa
Schoob Xhthars Ekrrentary School 4,785 Nelh 2100 Maiers Bite
Newport Elementary Sclaol 4,950 Sud.w t 1327 Vkst Bahoa Boukwrd
Cilken's Center By the Sea 4,910 Soutlrvzst 1400 Rest Balboa l A,,utd
Newport lJoighls Ekn—t y 4,981 NoMwest 300 E 15th Sheet
Newport Hm[x La,hemn Chinch 910 Abrlh 798 Dmer Drive
St AxkeWs Panbyterim Church 2,047 Northwest 600 StAtahtwa Road
Places of Winship St John Yanney Chapel 4,480 Southeast 314 hbrme A.eaue
Quist Church by the Sea 4,910 Saahwest 1400 Rbst Balboa Bouleverd
Ourladyofhbunt CamelCLumh 5,172 Sud.0 t 1441 Rbst Bahoa Boulevard
Hospitals Newport BayFbspaal 1,265 Pbdh 1501 East 16th Sheet
as es
Bal o Bauch Litany y 4,277 South 100 FastBabw Boulewrd
ilbtvherslilnary 5,182 Meth 1300 htme Awme
Bob HamyPark 1,370 North 900DaserDtw
Back BayWwPadr 2,904 Southeast Janiwree Road and Pata&Fast Coast
Hghway
Back Bey Golf&Fness 3,724 Nadheast 1107 Jamboree Road
Recoamun/patks Genoa Park 3,791 %at 232 Va Genoa
lbtperPah4 4,546 Meth 452 E 18th Sheet.Costa bksa
Cmlade We Ptuk Q750 Natheast 1554 Ca"Dme
PbkkyPatk 4,794 Nrdmest 360 Ogle Sheet,Costa lvksa
CERAM Park 4,840 Malmest 298 PUnhside Awme
Noe:
I.Maaces am measured llmathe emmrpmpd bandarya*aul tat fiaa ulitiAalmswc M vWamas Alan the vrerimot'tle Mjed sue.
Source: Googk FaM,2017.
Final .December 2017 3-8 Errata
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Table 5.10-2
Sensitive Receptors
ApProrJmate Orientation
Moor- Dismuce from Project Location/Description
from Project Site
She(feet)
25 North Sin le Fa Residences
Residential ResilentialUes 25 East SiagicFaradyResideares
25 South Sin le Fa Resides
50 Vest SoZIcFaadyRmderres
Hotels Hyatt Regency Newpat Beach 3,705 East 1107Jamboree Road
13J.hm 5,269 South 105 hkm Shea
Newpw Harbor ABgh Sch0o1 1,925 Nmhuest 600 house Acerae
Harare Ensign 5rcermediate School 2,765 Nonhwest 2000 ClffD=
HaTer Elementary School 4,546 Ntth 452 E 18th Street,Costa Asa
Schools Xharsers Ekrrentary School 4,785 North 210D bhsners Do.
Newport FlementarySchool 4,950 Sahhwest 1327 Rest Balboa Badevard
ChShens Center By the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 Rest More Boulevard
Newport lkighls Elcocacry 4,981 Nodroest 300 E 15th Street
Newpon Fmbor LuIieran Church 910 Math 798D rDdm
St AxheWs Presbyterian Church 2,047 Nodrest 600 St Andrews Road
Phoes of St John Ymnney Chapel 4,480 Southeast 314Mricc wenue
RbrshP
4vist Church by the Sea 4,910 Southwest 140p Rest Ecaea Baskvard
Our IadyofMnmt Camel Chinch 5,172 Sahhwest 1441 Aest Balboa Boulevard
Hospicak Newportt Bay liasptal 1,265 NbA 1501 Past 16th Street
LL9atks 13sixe Branch Lbrary 4,277 South 100 Fast Haaoa Boukvanl
ilMriners library 5,192 Nath 1300 M.Aserme
Bob Heruy Park 1,370 Nash 900DocerDte
Back BayWwPadr 2,904 Southeast Jard..c Road aM Pasts East Coast
ff9h`aY
BackBayG.If&£mess 3,724 Northeast 1107 Jamboree Road
Recmah,dpatks Gesaa Park 3,791 Rest 232 Ve Genoa
HaTerPark 4,546 Math 452 E 18th Street,Costa lvksa
Galasie 4iewPatk 4,750 Northeast 1554 CraloyDice
PmkkyPask 4,794 Nmhwest 360 Ogle Suc4 Costa Nksa
ChffJlit-e Pads 4,940 Nvthwest 2981thourode Antmre
Tat:
I stances are--.dhkmsthe everiurpmpdhamdary or*aM cot room uliriA I tructasp jeers/areas wtlrm the mrerix.f9x pmpa she.
Source: Gouge PaM,NIT
Section 5.0,page 5.3-10, Mitigation Measure BIO-1
BIO-1 To the extent feasible, construction activities shall be scheduled outside of the nesting
season (typically February 15 to August 15) to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds.
However, if construction must occur during the nesting season, all suitable habitat
surrounding the project site shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds
by a qualified biologist prior to commencement of site disturbance activities.
Final .December 2017 3-9 Errata
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pmnp Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
If an active avian nest is discovered in proximity to the project site during the nesting bird
survey,construction activities shall stay outside of a 300-foot buffer around the active nest.
For raptor species, this buffer shall be expanded to 500 feet. A biological monitor shall
be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest in
order to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activities.
The buffer area and lim ay he reduced anon coordination with
the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, provided the nesting behaviors are not
disrupted by construction activities Once the young have fledged, normal construction
activities shall be allowed to occur.
Section 5.0,page 5.4-16, Mitigation Measure CUL-1
CULT Prior to ground-disturbing activities, a qualified archaeologist shall provide an
Archaeological Monitoring Protocol Plan for the project. The archaeologist shall provide
training to a Contractor's Representative regarding the Archaeological Monitoring Protocol
Plan and the identification of archaeological resources. The training shall be open to Native
American tribal representative(s), to assist the Contractor's Representative in identifying
potential tribal cultural resources. The plan shall identify procedures for the event that
potential resources are discovered by the Construction Contractor.
If evidence of potential subsurface archaeological resources is found during site
disturbance/excavation activities, these activities shall cease within 50 feet of that area and
the construction contractor shall contact the Orange County Sanitation District Residen
Engineer. Construction activities shall be allowed to continue in other areas of the site. The
Resident Engineer shall then retain a qualified archaeologist to evaluate the discovery prior
to resuming grading/construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find. If
warranted, the archaeologist shall collect the resource, and prepare a test-level report
describing the results of the investigation. The test-level report shall evaluate the site
including discussion of the significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of the
resource),final mitigation recommendations,and cost estimates.
If the archaeologist determines that the find is prehistoric or includes Native American
materials,affiliated Native American groups shall be invited to contribute to the assessment
and recovery of the resource, as applicable. The archaeologist and any applicable Native
American contacts shall collect the resource and prepare a test-level report describing the
results of the investigation. The test-level report shall evaluate the site including discussion
of significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of the resources), final mitigation
recommendations, and cost estimates.
Salvage operation requirements pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CE,QA Guideknes shall
be followed. Work within the area of discovery shall resume only after the resource has
been appropriately inventoried,documented,and recovered, as applicable.
Section 5.0,page 5.7-15, Mitigation Measure HAZ-1
HAZ-1 Prior to demolition activities,an asbestos survey shall be conducted by an Asbestos Hazard
Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and California Division of Occupational Safety and
Health (Cal/OSHA) certified building inspector to determine the presence or absence of
Final .December 2017 3-10 Errata
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pp Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
asbestos containing materials (AGMs). If ACMs are located,abatement of asbestos shall be
completed prior to any activities that would disturb ACMs or create an airborne asbestos
hazard. Asbestos removal shall be performed by a State certified asbestos containment
contractor in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) Rule 1403. Contractors performing ACM removal shall provide evidence of
abatement activities to the Orange County Sanitation District Difeetaf of E*"eeaft8.
Section 5.0,page 5.7-16, Mitigation Measure HAZ-2
HAZ-2 If paint is separated from building materials (chemically or physically) during demolition of
the structures, the paint waste shall be evaluated independently from the budding material
by a qualified Environmental Professional. If lead-based paint is found, abatement shall be
completed by a qualified Lead Specialist prior to any activities that would create lead dust or
fume hazard. Lead-based paint removal and disposal shall be performed in accordance with
California Code of Regulation Tide 8, Section 1532.1, which specifies exposure limits,
exposure monitoring and respiratory protection, and mandates good worker practices by
workers exposed to lead. Contractors performing lead basedpaint removal shall provide
evidence of abatement activities to the Orange County Sanitation District Dixecter—ef
Section 5.0,page 5.7-16, Mitigation Measure IL42 4
HAZ-4 If unknown wastes are discovered during construction by the contractor that are believed to
involve hazardous waste or materials,the contractor shall comply with the following:
• Immediately cease work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant,and remove
workers and the public from the area;
• Notify the Orange County Sanitation District Dife" 3
• Secure the area as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District Direetex-ef
Rapaeeeieg;and
• Notify the Orange County Health Care Agency's Hazardous Materials Division's
Hazardous Waste/Materials Coordinator (or other appropriate agency specified
by the Director of Engineering). The Hazardous Waste/Materials Coordinator
shall advise the responsible parry of further actions that shall be taken,if required.
Section 5.0,page 5.9-8, 2nd paragraph
The City's LCP and associated Coastal Land Use Plan (CLUP) were appreved certified by the CCC
on Septeisaher 8, 2016,anuary . . 7, and are expeeted te _______ became effective in
33L 2017. The CLUP sets forth goals, objectives, and policies that govern the use of land and water
in the coastal zone within the City of Newport Beach and its sphere of influence consistent with the
General Plan. The City's CLUP identifies the Coastal Act coastal resources planning and management
policies that are relevant to Newport Beach. The CLUP addresses Coastal Act policies within three
chapters: Land Use and Development; Public Access and Recreation; and Coastal Resource
Protection. Each section or subsection begins with the identification of the Coastal Act sections that
are relevant to Newport Beach,followed by a narrative of the local setting and policy direction adopted
by the City to address the requirements of the Costal Act and a listing of specific policies.
Final .December 2017 3-11 Errata
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Section 5.0,page 5.10-16, Mitigation Measure NOI-1
NOI-1 Prior to the initiation of construction,the Orange County Sanitation District shall confirm
that the Grading Plan,Building Plans,and specifications stipulate that:
• All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly
operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation
devices.
• The Cetxraetet Orange County Sanitation District shall provide a geali€ted"Noise
Disturbance Coordinator." The Disturbance Coordinator shall be responsible for
responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is
received,the Distunbance Coordinator shall
eemp6int- determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early,
bad muffler, etc.) and shall implement ceeseasble measures to resolve the
complaint; ______ ____�__-__ - or ___ and
comply with the Ciro Noise Ordinance. The the constructinn
hotline telephone number shall be dearly posted
on-site.
• When feasible, construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive
uses (e.g.,residences, schools,hospitals, etc.).
• During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that
emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers.
• Typical construction activities that produce noise shall not take place outside of the
allowable hours specified by the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code Section
10.28.040 (7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on
Saturdays; construction is prohibited on Sundays and/or federal holidays).
Alternative work hours may be designated by the Cityto reduce ocher im acre sue
asAIUfflZ
Section 5.0,page 5.10-16, Mitigation Measure NOI-2
NOI-2 Prior to initiation of construction of the Newport Bay Channel force main crossing, the
Orange County Sanitation District shall verify that all construction plans and specifications
include temporary barriers (noise attenuating panels) around the horizontal directional
drilling (HDD)/mwromnneling equipment (launch and receiving sites) with at least the
following specifications. Alternate specifications and/or materials may be utilized
provided they demonstrate an equivalent level of noise attenuation.
• Noise-producing equipment shall be shielded from nearby areas of human
occupancy by erecting sound barriers of at least 24feet in height which completely
surround the work site and break the br e-of-sight between the noise source and
the receptors. Equipment shall be located in positions that direct the greatest noise
emissions away from sensitive areas.
Final .December 2017 3-12 Errata
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
• The frame of the barrier shall be located around the PD/micrmm�nelinq
eetipmententife petiffietee of the eansemetion sees and consist of 3-inch by 3-
inch by 0.065-inch thick steel robing with welded joints. Alternatively, the frame
can be constructed from lumber, but must be of sufficient strength to be
structurally stable.
• The temporary construction noise barrier shall consist of four layers of material
attached to the frame with metal screws:
— 18 ounce tarp;
— 2-inch thick fiberglass blanket R-7.5;
— V.-inch thick weatherwood asphalt sheathing;and
— 7/16-inch sturdy board siding.
• The temporary construction noise barrier shall have a surface density of 4.84
pounds per square foot.
Section 5.0,pages 5.11-6—5.11-8,Mitigation Measure TRA-1
TRA-1 Prior to initiation of construction activities,a Management Plan engineering
drawings and specifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the Orange
County Sanitation District Direeter of
C I'f i D p rt t f
Transportation_ and the City Public Works Department.
121 s These documents shall,at a minimum,address the following:
• Traffic control for any lane closure, detour, or other disruption to traffic
circulation including hicvde and pedestrian trails. Bicycle and pedestrian trails
shall remain open during construction or re-routed to ensure continued
connectivity
• OC-T- -Bus stop access im acts shall be txaintained coordinated with OCTA.
• At least three business days before any construction activities that would affect
travel on nearby roadways, the construction contractor shall notify the N&svpett
ity of Newport
Beach Public Works Department, of construction activities that could impede
movement (such as lane closures) along roadways, to allow for uninterrupted
emergency access. Surrounding property owners shall also be notified of project
activities through advanced mailings.
• Identify construction vehicle haul routes for the delivery of construction materials
(i.e.,lumber, tiles,piping,windows,etc.) to the site; necessary traffic controls and
detours;and a construction phasing plan for the project.
• Identify any off-site construction staging or material storage sites.
• Specify the hours during which transport activities can occur and methods to
mitigate construction-related impacts to adjacent streets.
Final .December 2017 3-13 Errata
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
• Require the Contractor to keep all haul routes clean and free of debris,including
but not limited;to,gravel and dirt resulting from its operations. The Contractor
shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District
of any material which
may have been spilled,tracked,or blown onto adjacent streets or areas.
• Hauling or transport of oversize loads shall be allowed between the hours of 9:00
a.m. and 3:00 p.m.only,Monday through Friday. No hauling or transport shall be
allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or Federal holidays. Any oversized
loads utilizing Coast Highway shall obtain a Caltrans permit for such activities.
• Use of local streets shall be prohibited except what is reiluired to nro.dde direct
access to the l2miect site.
• Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall yield to public traffic at all times.
• If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, streets, curbs,
and/or gutters along the haul route, the contractor shall be frilly responsible for
repairs. The repairs shall restore the damaged property to its original condition.
• All constructed-related parking and staging of vehicles shall be kept out of the
adjacent public roadways and shall occur on-site or within other off-street areas,
• Construction-related lane closures will would only occur between the hours of 9:00
&3Q a.m. and 3a00 330 p.m., Monday through Friday. More or less rest cove
closure hours may be nrescribed by the City.
• Use of a construction flagperson to assist in maintaining efficient vehicle travel in
both directions, particularly during peak travel hours, and use of construction
signage and safe detour routes for pedestrians and bicyclists when travel lanes and
sidewalks along Coast Highway,Dover Drive,and Bayside Drive are affected.
• The enoineerinv drawinos and snecifications
shall meet standards established in the current California Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Device (MUTCD).
Section 10.0,page 10.2
City of Newport Beach,Back Bay 1QndingPlanned Community Development Plan(PC-9),Adopted February
25,2014 and Amended Anril 26, 2t116.
Final .December 2017 3-14 Errata
4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
This page intentionally left blank.
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING
AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CEQA requires that when a public agency completes an environmental document which includes
measures to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects, the public agency must adopt a
reporting or monitoring plan. This requirement ensures that environmental impacts found to be
significant will be mitigated. The reporting or monitoring plan must be designed to ensure compliance
during project implementation (Public Resourves Code Section 21081.6).
In compliance with Public Roonrcer Code Section 21081.6,the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program has been prepared for the proposed Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement
Project. This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is intended to provide verification that all
mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project are
monitored and reported. Monitoring will include 1)verification that each mitigation measure has been
implemented; 2) recordation of the actions taken to implement each mitigation; and 3) retention of
records in the project file.
This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program delineates responsibilities for monitoring the project,
but also allows the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) flexibility and discretion in determining
how best to monitor implementation. Monitoring procedures will vary according to the type of
mitigation measure. Adequate monitoring consists of demonstrating that monitoring procedures took
place and that mitigation measures were implemented.
Reporting consists of establishing a record that a mitigation measure is being implemented, and
generally involves the following steps:
• OCSD distributes reporting forms to the appropriate entities for verification of compliance.
• Departments/agencies with reporting responsibilities will review the Environmental Impact
Report,which provides general background information on the reasons for including specified
mitigation measures.
• Problems or exceptions to compliance will be addressed to OCSD as appropriate.
• Periodic meetings may be held during project implementation to report on compliance of
mitigation measures.
• Responsible parties provide OCSD with verification that monitoring has been conducted and
ensure, as applicable, that mitigation measures have been implemented. Monitoring
compliance maybe documented through existing review and approval programs such as field
inspection reports and plan review.
• OCSD prepares a reporting form periodically during the construction phase and an annual
report summarizing all project mitigation monitoring efforts.
Final .December 2017 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring&Reporting Program
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
• Appropriate mitigation measures will be included in construction documents and/or
conditions of permits/approvals.
Minor changes to the Mi&gatton Monitoring and Reportng Program, if required, would be made in
accordance with CEQA and would be permitted after further review and approval by OCSD. Such
changes could include reassignment of monitoring and reporting responsibilities, plan redesign to
make any appropriate improvements, and/or modification, substitution or deletion of mitigation
measures subject to conditions described in CEQA Guidekner Section 15162. No change will be
permitted unless the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program fails to satisfy the requirements of Pu6Gc
Resourrer Code Section 21081.6.
Final .December 2017 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring&Reporting Program
Environmmtal Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Stsh.and Force Mains Replacement Pr jeer
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING CHECKLIST
Mmibrmg,
Mttgaton M16vuormg Party Respons3k MAIPYA'IONOF CQMIIAbICE
Ffigetion M;ssure R Porfmg
rirmber Process Mlesmnes Rrt MmrtormB loiba4 IDk Remad¢
AFS=cs
APS-1 Pror b bswn®ofarry gcsdng sMb demoluon lzvk srd Prorbksuarce Qange Coanly
perrMs, Wkhcsw incurs fist cvgmeemg Aapmwl of d&adm,l Sano-afnn Dstrct
drawings aM specDicaYwm Ad be subnmmd Ef C.,,. n Ikrmdnm
ovisw and approval by the Or a aunty Ana, WPlaa Pemds
Savo Dis . These dam . shag at a
amWrvm W aw tl e9ugmcm and wh k
stag areas,stodpd g ofm*fiak,knaW(Le.,
mrepwary Enahrg wih opagae Wnalt and haw
mums} Smgkg areas sha0 bs sued smPo
ened m oN b rrmio¢e pubk we m dre
namraan ¢earn practicable. Cm .m haW
ranee shsn m iraacts m servsmux uses m
tlm kssbksYkama byawidmgbcalresrkndalspeed,
.
APS-2 P D shsl s elms&si phm o stafim ed Sh Raz,Fml Prvab Qenge Camry
OCSD stall suMd deign phns of the poposed Reukw,Foal Corev sta of Sarmauon usvkt
puns ,slbdm CM1W,Pisaml Beach Erreakw Reas d PunaS ,
&kpWd audy*Cry's Pkmmg Cmrnt or Iayvvnlof Famhy
dW W&amhmuy 6f Sue Rsebpnevt&e y L>zegrP6ru
aM b demmim come& wilh tlm Eck�y
Ia PCDP des' ighRg
AES-3 anconswctom shsl I�rtngfumes (Ed'W RCa.f Prior to N�gLume Qange Cam
pwtabk adjashah sesre adownw�a�rdA.Aai.. lapmvil of Couswceon Seimanon psvict
ausY Bom adjacent s ftye a s (•W�0 Cawhmfnn PoM�ee
Lighwg s and silt of lty sensmse areas) SeEtyfiglemg
[ightkg shah mmist of the nm®al oaring¢ Pkn
awssaryb provide saEryattlm<ovsmrcuon sie.
Acwsshuckn C.,.Iy Soda 6n sha06esubmmed
m thQ l p.wga�,h Cktrict Er revEw
aM a s, prior b any r�rt0re conshtrdon
eemwes.
Final.December 2017 43 Mitigation Monibdng&Reposing Progrem
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Mtigaaon ^tr:.....e^ hbniroringand hbnitormg PartyRspansbk 4ERR'ICA'BONOF CQM'l1 b
atbll lvhasure Repartbg
Pmcess Mkatodes b[Mrouotmg loitiah Lhte Remadcs
AFS4 Pror to consadcdon otrie proposed pump satwit In,avvand Prorto Qange County
dghmg pbds shad ac pra ddd m the Orange /pprewlof Cowauclmof Sanimrbn D"',
Cowry Sandadon Ilaaict far de k and appmwl Ouldowlighaug be Pueq,Stalbn
and to une C.,of Nexpmt teach fire derive and Plan
appmwl by the CRy's Phwh%Canrbsion far Sad
Cbwbpnent Revieww the dglntbg plan shah
�aace narniadr,x Ha Back Bay landg
PMP regulatirra tar bgldmg. Per base
mqubementc,ad owdoor loving fmares sla0 be
hsiqred,ahhded,aided,heated,and n®mtamed
ro nw ad,da6 W adjarm a., and a vet
mtoad' cent aka ormecMa .
AR P¢1 Friar ro C)rd dhCanary
anaryS assochced vmh the Re`iwofPmdxi P�brmhswece Qe�Cawry
pjecl,fla Qange Cow rya,Bo nDeaiashad Phw ud pdn*Ekdg Sennanon QSNet
cOlJomthatrM QadBaat, Bsddmg Plana,and Spectlbaawa; Penak,Dmmg
SCAQ adore stpulete bad, m conpl®nw dust
Ca rdadsn Cuveatxlion
enasaD Rub coca edd w bBke dust 5apectlmis
ads shad.naoaedby regdhrwaR[mg or
olherdwtprewwwde gufla,asspecifieddibe
SCAQMJ's Rules and R a aknd !n eddam,
SCAQM)RWe402dd,to idpbuemarion ofdwt
auppession a:chnques to pewit fugitive dw[fiam
aeatmg a vuaa., o&sue. mpbvrt-td.n o[du
buta,a. roes fta re. mshort-cemifu�ue
Aaturtacs wwadryseramw receptors:
• Pll ache pyrroas of dw caadwwn sue
shad be w Wded every dude hmas dorag
deay maauctba acbVhs when dust u
obaered na ra%Ig Earn be preFM sk w
prewand.ashe a.afdwa
• Aply wo-mxb and smbdtrers w an ud awd
red and sa
Final.December 2017 44 Mitigation Manton,&Reporting Program
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Slaked and Force Mains Replacement Project
Mtigaaon ^tr:^ kbnaonng and Ivbnitormg Party Responsible 4ERR'ICA'IgNOF COM'l1 b
.....ea.Mnl lvkasnre Nocea18 Mkstdnes 6rlvbniidring kitiak L9te Remade,
aldas to reduce Ale need far uAA,mg after
dusts dkbcrryya film ft,csac.
Mefi ,denteshan..ffwt
naat,tread tle sk dwmg sa
dism : s
•
My onene stoclples afdems,dot,oro0er
d Wmddkrbl sbanbe d,conered,or
ea¢red.xk a nda-e dady, mn-kdc soabvders
sbafibe applkd;
• eW radng nerd euavaain operas sW
be sus,radd¢ben vvid speeds ex d25
raids per hour,
Dsaabed areas sbakbe replaced aahgmmd
rape,edimN®le a&rwisvuclim
s camkted Attle off cadd area;
Trdckam dcvies sucb as grand!bed eack-
ow apmw(3 inches deep,25 @etkng,12
@et ede per bne add edged by tack ham
mwotamiss)aIafl be oraa6ed k ed o
wd/dta lockout fined unpaved tack edt
mutes. Altedda n y,a afeel aaabw abaft
be wed at rmck d.mores;
Oneae vxhick speed abdH be maakd ro IS
Addes per hav
M nadwrbl dawpoMd off k shaft be
th er suEokntry eaared tr ecauddit
covered m patent evicessine armlet of
that prilat,de Ale'bakre and
Final.December 2017 4-5 Mitiga.idn Monitoring&Reporting Program
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Mtigaaon ^tr:^ Abnhoangand Ivbnitorng Party Responsibk 4ERR'ICA OF COM'l1 b
.....aatkll lvkasure en8 Mkstones 6rlvbniioring nitak Wte R dddids
Tmcl¢aaamaad wth sodhauing.acha.s
snap awu resldendala.and�rt
des ad bmkmaas to the eweat kasble.
PQ2 Fum 0 tle iinacn of wrntl wn,da Gange ReriewofPmlxl Peiab Qavge Clan"
Coady sar�fem wuxt shaft erdaud tlat auduks Pkru esd Conaau wn; Saiwanonr aan
tltataremhaWemavatedm®adedna¢ralonete Spec�catnw; Gang
(Sahgshaftwryada an F%hma k Cade SdW aM3114 Cmubucdon Consmedon
to S, lmd311HpJmaad wuhspe a aadvaddd, NapecWns
a sections 23114(ddd) of (dh r as al sp&g
rega�dnb me p taead n of amh�re dal apang
ohm public sneers aM roads. 'Ibs requvetrent
ahaftbed,*dmiPare aM speN dms brdre
ea 'a
BpIDCR(:N,RESoGt
R l To dre event kank,ewsbucdon acbires abaft Cm klanof Ridmr3 Wye andau Cowry
be scheduled ouuule of da mstng season PreC Uudtka Prorat 0.T SarrEWnGebce
(typka0y Febmmy 15 W Agri[ 15) to avid Oeaame Survey of(bmud Pak"wbl t
p..I ngacw to msing bbra. Hoverer, f fa?Ystng Bids Gabnbng
onsaucnon na.t stew Rung the msmig season, hdMes
aft sudabk habtat s.und,die p ject she shaft
be tla aaghb, rveyed brine preserve ofmaf,
birds bya gushed bialapt prim to c moment
ofsne distwbance aamlaea.
Ilan ae avpn neat 6 di,dd,d Rd to p..*W
dre PMect sue dmng dre mstng bid sr Y
eonsbucdon ae0emes shaft stay owside as 3
kot WE, amund Ed acdue at F. apbar
species,tls bu�rsiaftbeexpandedm5006et A
b,unda l monim shsdbe a an a delneaa the
boundaries ofthe ade area and s rmwm dd
acme nestnlya med by thatmatagbehava
mla Ta=and
aabyconnb addadEn n m.
'The,dddM us and Edadons on consducdon nay
be n.Nuced coorrinamn wbh da (316xrtia
Final.December 2017 4-6 Mitigation Monitoring&Reposing Progrem
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Mtigaaon Monioring and Ivbnitorbg Party Responsible 4ERR'ICA'IgNOF COM'IIANCE
Mtigatiov M14aswe em8 Mkstones 6rlvbniioring bitiak Late R dddids
RpaNteea of FO and MdW, provided the
ncstmg bchavbrs are not dumped bycrostraction
acmes Que the young haw&ds d.Hanel
mumrtion actrvi0es shah be aAoxed b ame.
CIILIURALRESOIAtCES
QJI,I Prkr to pt shantwbbg acmes, a olagral ReTddnm,d Prfany&ain, Qaoge Counry
ar ddngt shall povitle an ndj'a bgral dgaaa ofarry Dming Sarma&a OemaC
Mmiabg Pmtacol P br the project The Regvdbg Conn Pvmg Pn9em
archaeobgutsba0povale travwigba hdddldlor's Nbddd gbal CmaWc0on lrchaeobgn
Manta ng Pea rega�g the n ueobgbal Mmnwmg Concaa.
Mnmmg Rl ad Plan add 0e lining tiro d Protocol Plan; Camraclor
o,n0bdl resources. al sae shag be Bmhag
opea to Nz!oaua anamaernmM in Iffy g ComWctim
aa�istn al ]dnmS Represemative b idemaybg
Wn* robed,ads E ftawces. The plan shall
identLy a ad, s G the y da dat poundal
are dacowred by the Cmaavc&n
CmAacmr.
E euvkrcc of potemel sabswl. armaeobgyal
sssdac ssals se v,dua kdta
actiuIDas,tlase acfivtlbs shelcease vnM1m W batM
fad
areaaMdecmrsNeLL con0actw'sba0c
orange Cowry Sarwatim�vwt Curetrmnn
acriuui&s sha06eaRn tEn m,ahan 0 rareasa
9ss sJe. 'Ile Resident F,almer sbag men ,pri a
0 dati damlmeodmgkota ewbdaned a eme n la,
b nedind g gritty f dad trtim a adorn b the
amedbre t,ha of me trod buenanbd, dun
arefsthwl s,da ddmtlng flx, ,aM pmfe2
a mstkwl repmr descrLvg the asuE of tla
mvcsaga adas,iun fre ortshal add the
saeamlodhg dscadd. ofinesg�a, (deem,
maac,midSoa end excem of tl¢asauce),fiial
' tionrewnaeMatiwu aMcastesmtaces.
Final.December 2017 4-7 Mitigation Monitoring&Reposing Program
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Mitgaton Abunoringand Mrutormg Party Respoasibk 4ERR'ICIX OF COM'l1 b
Mtigation M;asnre Nocebt8 Mkstones mrlvbnimring bitiak Daw Remadcs
d Nc a dland b'a dcremmas Rai Nc fad a
mMtd b or bdes Came Me.rma,.k'
at9khd Native M .getups sban be vtr7red m
cmvr0ute m die assessment aad recovery of the
as appkabk. The an h ola t and airy
appkabk Nafiw Arericaa cadud m sME cofieada
ww and prepare a rest-level report des '
th resam oftle�wsdgatimi. The cent-level report
Anal lMae due ss mcbdmg dscussm of
s®aicarae(depda nature,condmt,and d�of
daresa fimlmngeronremmmeMafiore,aM
costestidnawaaams.
Sam,operaacvt regoi ..ptna.rt m Secfinn
150(A.5 ofda CEQA Qndle me,stud be 6hmed
w dInd Ne area ordbaown shad.aUda:nmy
akrth soune has been appa priatymw.WrrA
doamanad.ardremwred ass Icabk.
CU42 Pwr m &t lath Maidg actives, n qualified Relhddd art P M,CM g Qange Carty
plod o gist shall,t M a M.a.M PW.* dglld Pen Cadmg $anJef OktrkS
Pkn Er da p jeec The pkn she8 rabk Regaadng Pen* n .Wb
iaaada ad 6x Ne ewMdat porendel recowrebk Mmmrvtg Corumation Coa.and
Saau are discovered by d Coravuctiw PMocol Pkq Coratwcan
Cmmacmr. The 9u.b'pndAnmbgiscald haw ❑amg Contractor
&.MwA m geobgyartl/orpan,la, bgy vote Corstnxtion
dcmonsnead cwryetenee v reskoab, &Mamb,
,nnidd and cur a The pakowomget slafi
preride tra'M b a Cmmecmts R Plan
a nWme
iddn d g n MWamg Prdocol Pbn and tM
mfial fion ofpakomnbgimalda, C. Rdumtg
la
Rd gmutddem&W acmmks,dss Caedanenu
ReResematbx dete 1, to Net s .bk
encamrered are n,i m caIMR temwrabk
msaik ra daNer anau be angaaaai
Final.December 2017 4-8 Mitigation Monimring&Repotting Program
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Mtgadon hbnnoring and Ivbnitorbg In,Responsibk 4ERR'ICIX OF COM'l1 b
hitgatiov M14asnre en8 Mkstones for M,.aoring Initiak IAte R dddids
Fbuerer, suspeck
e-.n,ddmng round dstudabg acdvnce,the
Rd 60owigstrsha06etel¢n:
The rmsn sk shoo rot be muched rwvcQ
orduaubednanyvay.
tt'mksba0stopan fie irnediate area,anda
brgh* co- dbuBeranonbe marked v.V fia
bright, cobred fiaWd. Nl fimher
asmad Co or dte Bagged area anon occur
rnwme emtoer«naa nkarea de area.
The CmihaUds Fe .e nabs,eonsftcdon
faretren or au, or aban be vmed ay
mfi&d
The Cmhacm s Rdp acdta n sbanqui:W
"ou.ro the find and tmlx a detemna.of
scetce. IFBte find k not sigtdcant,Bre
kad. ahao be mimed vdren a la
aaeptebk b reswe xakittic area.
Vtlu Coascror's Fep ddaaYue a urebk
ro nuke a .conch.regankg the
find Ne qualified pakonualovt elaaR be
noti&a m assess Ibc fmd.! necessary,tM
qualified pakdawbgst sbaB decebp a plan
of nags. uhbh v Flay iieWa
snkage exddvafidn and n,.1 dflhe fmd,
removal of 'd&ae t fimn arawd the
specneq research ad domdY and
categor a de fins curdbod ofdte find in a
lace]quaUdd telnski,,and pdpana.of
wmurnnt the find
Final.Ilecember 2017 4-9 Mitigation Monitoring&Reposing Program
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Mtigakon M,nitotingand hbaitormg Patty Responsbk 4ERR'ICA'IgNOF CQM'IIANCE
M[igatimt lvhasme RePanbB Mkstoaes
Pmcess -nn loitiak L w Remada
AND M41E
W l P.dadddM dactivuws,anasksms swcysbal /skstos Swey; Promo QWCowry
be and wd by an Alw,os Ham Ead eacy Asbestos Remlkonof Satw wawa Gsnict
Besp,mse M(NIFRA)and Calbmia Division of N *nrem(ff F fidg RmW
Qvaryafimal3aENmdFkaM(@VO3FWce necessary) Smdon
bndd g mspeam 0 dmnnzw dw M me or
absemeofasW,tos mmalulugarawrek(AC If
4 are bated abmda,dt ofasbesms sha0 be
conPwRd prow to any amiocs d at.wuld dnuol,
P or maw an a ashes" bard
Asksbs ..I shal be pmanand by a Sam
cetd&d asbestos omnaiurent mdwddr m
amudance wih row Soap Coast A Quaky
Mnagerrent Dwbv (SCPQhU Raw MI
Conoamw pemvnh,g PGMwmmal sbaa poabk
eviieoce of ebaw.dt acmes to de Crange
Sanhadonmdat
L 2 If paint Q separawd barn bldmg rrewnah RevwwofPard P Wanny Qe�Caauy
wfwmmaM m ph,s"ly)d,nmg hm Wdn of the Waste Evabman Ewnaklvnn Satmadon tismct
a..,, dw pm -war, sba0 W evaluated h iaios;Dodag
Ww,w en* fiaa dw budding dam nod by a D mak an
qualified EtrvirnmemalPmEssiowL Ifw.d wd
,bt s bmd abawrnnm shaft be mn,,kted by a
qualifed Uad SWck%t p or m ady acwh6,$flat
wnudenemekaddmtorfiarebamrd lead-based
paint..]and&"a]shad be perbrued in
a onlanee with Csfibma Code ofReguhdon Tde
g,Seclm I532.1,which s we a ea,amuw hams,
adanhwn nol aMwspvmt a becfion,etd
darn ds good wodan tacdces da g kan
hwp d d m wad. CmIaal rs perbmmg war f
based paint nem� shaft pouvle a fierce of
ehwrtent acWmes b tlw Qange Coonry
SaWatim�V t
Pinal.D mber2010 4-10 Mitigation Monitoring&Raponing Progtam
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Mtigaaon ,Wnirotingand hbnitorng PartyRsponsbld 4ERR'ICA'IgNOF CQM'l1 b
Mtigatiat lvkasure RePartbg
�� Pmcess Mmabnes b[Mronotng loiak L9te Retmdrs
W3 The mnseucron ..dar shall retlot a Phase Spoik Sarrylbg Wang QangeCwnry
NSnc Rieaccedmtion SMaana ce eadoo, Mnag Consuu<an San.,.N.L
setrgatg of s,k aswaced x In tal Cmulmetin Plisse ok
dv,cnonal~msmowmfug aemnes 6 fin Clwadcmaan
anam wnaaacan par to Paper daposal of sod S,w.6t;
.W.b offaa. ] sa.&, sa0 dte®e Cwslnumon
rather the spots<wan hamNwss xasres,and ff cdddd rc
so,d spoi ,daa0 be d posed ofm aaadarc vah
Pedeal and Sincere
HPZ4 If un4 a uasWa are dwrervd long Ws .don Dift Cmsfiucn,n
mutacdon by fit,nontrada dal are benewed to pnmg Comtnwtinv (armada;Oange
onvhe ha.rda.wrest,attnreak,the cdntddor Consva<an Canty sanipaon
shall carplywM the nnowbg: Nutt;N.rdans
Wbmmu,tak
haredncely ceasew in th me:iityofOx, Cardasta
sasped,dwntmnida tand n,.wwvdsrs
add thepubk fiand area;
• Nmry dte pang¢Cwnry Sartiaan BictriL
• Secure the area as duetted by dre Qange
County satwaan mt adt and
• Na* de Qange Cwnry Heats Care
Agency's Fbmnlnns AU,dah Di =s
HazaNwrsNW/narerea Cwrdnetor(a
ofiter appmpna2 agony spwbed by fie
O dddr of Fngute,tng) The H,.N
Wa:cemb arl Cnotdmatasanadorefin
res Patty ofra<are thetsheh
be mken,k n,ffre dfathe
Final•Ilecembtt 2010 4-II Mitigation Monitoring&Reponing Progtam
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Mtigaaon bbni And hbnitormg Party ResponsNk �FdBFICNgNOF CQM'IIANQi
Mitgatiov h4esure RePoPartmngnB Mkstao,s wM d
Process rrd, loidals Iea Remarks
H OLOGYANfIWNITR AI.r1Y
HW¢I Purr b sk daaubadcc a, sand as part oftbc Prcparddon and Penrad Qangc Connty
,*a"conpM1ana wih dadNP requkemerlk, subnnalofa Coaaucn,m Satadonmk
a Naice of leant M shaft be prepared and Mdce ofkant Coraavckn Comhucdon
sub dd a dle State %tdr Resources Qaky (FMB General Pemm Conan.
Camol BnaN(SWRCM pmWng notilcadun add
oaaa a odnFN wilt Ne Slam of aldmaa
C daa,don General Pemut
HWQ2 Mad poposed project sha0 con6lm to din Rdwavatd Ddad8 gang,Canty
mquierren6 ofan apadvnd Stain Naar PaMan C«rytiance wily Comvucn,n Sarwadon C!'acK
Pmaendon Pkn(SWPPP)(ta eappkdbrpiak lgpms,d SWPPP C duddon
ste fkshabaae)aMlbe NPLFy Pemu Br Gawal and NPM Cana.
Co uaa Addkk Mc G450WOo2,Qder bk. Perrot
rig9-0009 DW(.a anended by NIMIaONQ Conavrcnon
and 201200h m%irewa,"knnaaudn of kscecNas
ad recamc d Best Management Faactices
(HvP asap dbydm State NaterR ..a
QdawCormMBdadl(s�
HWQ3 [¢on caryktimofpmFncunsaucdorl,the QanSre Honceof Fokwng Qua,Cumty
County Santalkn Bali t sha0 subod a Nabde of Temmadan Caryktionof Santa ion Ilst
Te fida(NUD a the Slane Wad,Resources GIRT) C,mvucn,a
Quaky Crawl B,aN (SWRCB) m idnak Nat
coaao-ocuon z cdddlead.
MEE
MH-1 Pero 0 Ne iandban of oadaductin,In, Orenge Re OfCadng Priorto NdaWn Qavge County
Canty Sarwron MW shall conkm Nat the Plan,Qnldm'g ofCoramsrc; Salwabon DOwl
Qadng Plan, Budding Plan, and speed aR PY ,add Qvmg
slgadate Nat S,e &amnc; C Uddbm
muNahln
shag a mad,nequpmeut fnxd or rating kscecWis
and be tanadd d wilt gapedy opemtng
and adnooaa muaea ad odds Sate
regwed wise atkmatun devices.
Final.Berember2010 412 Mitigation Monitoring&Raponing Progsm
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Mtigaaon Abnhoring and Ivbnitormg Pa Responsibk 4ERRgCIX OF COM'l1 b
Mtigation lvtasnre Noeehl8 MmstoneIn,mr M,.aoring Initiak L9te R dddids
the caangc Camry sanna�.Ouuat sha0
provide a Nl se LSadb a CwuinanaT
The RsoabwKe Cowd'vamr slau be
reapoe far respmdvg m an, bral
catgan bao mnsnocudn rose. W ..
ow ban a rn.. , me Beaabarce
eoadnamr anau aamanae the caaae afore
roBe b.(d. ,oar g mo eaay,t d
mn�aem)andsteuvvp'namnreaswesm
reaohre aw m,,gnonanaeoapywhmec�y
WLO aanaroe. The c caaac&11 on-
aid,
nmroerehenh cbarrypos2d w.
sa.
ba daE,nal ,caraaucamheultowes shay
be designed m awid roue s.nee uses
(ag:,residences,schms,hospnak,etc}
Daft consnucaon,sm¢ry corameoon
equ,aent shau be placed such that emued
u duec dd awdy flan sensmw rose
T paal caaaucfkn acan&s daa[pnx t
mice Shan rot dde place a didd of na
a&x®bk howl speci&d by the Cdy of
&upon Beech Mmbgal Code Sectmn
10.28,O10 QW nm and 6:30 Pm on
—e kdays, 800 a.m and &W pm on
Saoadays; mmtuduon u pmhbied on
Sunda, aMla kdewl haka,a
Memamoaakh mybedesignatedby
the Cv m reduce other ngacts,such as
dafa.
Final.11ecember 2010 4-13 Mitigation Monitoring&Reponing Progtam
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Pr ject
Mtigation hbnimnfingng hbuitorhhg PartyR sponsbk 4ERR'ICA'IgNOF COM'l1 b
Mtigatkhlvbasure RePortbg
�� Process Mksbms b[Ivbwtonug kr a Lbte Remadcs
Wl2 Prior M snance of Rrmbbn or Wibbg Pena 6, ReviewofP6ns Pon,to L"dame Q.."Coamy
to pang County So....IXstrn shauatib that and Sgcifinatbre oflbmotition or San'..,Qsu*h
ao romnucada ph. and "tifidatom ircLde Bnudgftm ;
mrryorerybarodrs(misc ancautmg pamb)amwd Dn
the h alal d'w.1 ddrg C ftdadbon
(} ®cling t itarnnN daudda and
receiving sres) wfh at kart the Moving
speckmims. nd/or
ancerab ney be dtl dd provided toy denmnanod
an equodkntbal ofmae atlwattn
• NWbeprarbcag equgnprn slnt be
shelded fiom marby andw of hunea
rccup nny by eteabg somul W.ofat
least 2Lfeet heist dtidh cmopkaedy
sonata,the vuda n are sound
deaf
sine between be m e end the
"iud rs. Ft dx,d:t a, ,bated e
posidnss tat d,ect the greatest rw
enmswu xay banseruJive seas.
The fond of to barter shat be braced
aw nd the F raturdru ling equpndad
and consst of3-mh by}inch by0 WSmch
bek steel vadda, oda gelded pinta.
Nmmaduxly,the fiame can be cautnwced
flan knder, Fad mast be of suBdidad
streagth to be shucmalty amble.
The wro,orahy cassvmtlm mine bane,
shst atasat of bur byes of mte[al
attached to be flame x petal saexs:
18.tarp;
- 2-mh tldck ss bk R-7.5�
Fiml•Ilecember 2010 4-14 Mitigation Monitoring&Reponing Pro ram
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Mtigaaon Mtnhonng and Mmitormg Party Responsible \ERR'ICIX OF COM'l1ANCE
MOgatGn lvkasnre Nocektg Mkstones for M,.imring Initials ISte Retmtfa
/-Utah tack ecaltry aspand
alteathitg;ant
0/16oteh smmyboaN atlutg.
Ibe tetvpmsry corsmrtin none barter
sha0 hays a sw4ce denady of4 M panda
Go
IRAbBPORTAI1p�C
' l P w ante Camty
dra.,and specika.sbat be submited Gr Ppptmalofihe Cmsmsikn SattJatiw�trGq
d,wwand apptovalbyda,Q nW County Sardatn CmaVu lion CalYarss:CSryof
Oahict clawadt 4paNrcnt ofTanispodstem,and Anag ntpan blexport@ach
the CityFabk Wnda a'dandrt These docunn. M,5,Wbde
sbaq at ttmmsnrt adhess the bk an : rkpattda M
• TnGccmmol Grarrymtte cbsure,demW.W
bid
atlmrdurWWnmtna. cv%, B ld a'nd
,&,tand 1 sean t,ned N.d and
pedesbiau aatk she0 retrem open dtttitg
WOsmtelpn W reroumdmevure wimwed
cotmecd4%y.
Bts amp a mgscts shot be
• cwrdidakd wnhO A
N least duce business days beGre any
on
onnsm dnaiddad y acdadh a , tk trudawl
tcattry l n wys. the c fNe a adn
Beach W slat ratify the Cty of Nexpat
Beach Pubk
caottsttu ceon a apJ of
kid mat aadditn
reat (s.b . land eb ) kng
toad , amw 6r unandrdmal
trewra adcess. mdmg d,
to 'Itat oleo b dtkd f Wjc
cntvea d,,ah aawmcd naak
Final•December 2010 4-15 Mitigation Monitoring&Reponing Progtam
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project
Mtigaaon Abnbonng and Ivbnitormg Pa Responsibk 4ERR'ICIX OF COM'l1 b
Mtigarimr lvkasme Nocehrg Mkstones rty fdrlvbniroring Initiak IAte Remadcs
ben*COnsdu.vMk banl..' kr
the deanery of conodm ton materek (Le.,
hur &a,pipw, windows,ete)m tM
a.;recessary.&.6 aM delwrsi
and a coraaucron pbMsng Plan Er the
M'mn
Identdy any offsde wnstudwa smgog or
rre2relstdoo,sues.
Speedy the haw dmmg W h Mospon
acduides can occur and rtedads 0 rfi's,
cor¢aacdowehted roam an a*..
stlee6.
ReamtM ContractormkeepodbaM
ckan and flee of debris,mcbdng butt not not
Imwed to, sonael
Ma and dirt rw, 'lo firm es
ac m nt s. ta,a Qm wd b slnp ckan
Canny sdeets,as asM,,d by the Oeange
CowryS, aver❑t,da of.,rreceral
which Trey have hem spored, as
bbvm wto adycentsaeets orareas. on
• Fh,aed Mbanspmtofovessef :00. adbe
a6 wed between dre hnrvs of900 a.m and
M 00 R.oran Mmday though FNey, n,
,,O a a , shaft be allowed dvmg
haidare haul, vndvs,d hads, Or Federal
H'Mdy Myocereed Qkodnda m 'n Coast
audh.y sheA obten a Cebatw RrrK 6r
sucM1 activities.
Ike of heal stream sled M pmh kde
e epl Want is d, u d sd pov dhen
ss mtlie wjsctass.
Food December 2010 4-16 Mitigation Monitoring&Raponing Progtam
Environmental Impact Report
Bay Bridge Pump Slalioa and Force Mains Replacement Project
Mtigaaon kbunoting and Ivbnitormg In,Responsibk 4ERR'ICIX OF COM'l1 b
Mttgatiov h4esure Nocehl8 Mkstones for M,to naa, kitiak L9te Retmd,s
• Hool woks c.nd,or cxltug pubfm ehwb
shall yie41 m public uaf&ac au tines.
•
Hheabg opemaons¢dose any dermge m
exist, pavement meets, ante, amkr
gmR,s add,Rae haul muR,the can4sclm
shall be fi*d,p,d,bk fix repebe. Lu
re on,,naafirednded edarruged pmpedym
es otgbalcond¢mn.
Pkkks shag bd I p out oaNstagoayof
• whisk shaa be Imp[vet of the n-ak or
pubk,endways and shaft ocan ensue w
willfit oNwoffsaeetareas.
•
soave adla.d lane ckurea vouN
wty aww bervew the horns of 830 am
and3:30p.m,Mmda,&.,hFMay..Men
on kss reahsRw ckswe hoods nay be
ptesc bytl Cry
• ( d dfa¢tdOnn tgemon to assstin
rreuteiwg elder while pawl in both
dkecb , parocuhdy dig peak Bawl
howl,and use of.a aduan sigoage and
aA demur rooms for pedeatiada and
bkyc6ts Maw crawl lams and sideaa0a
akng Coost F4hasg Bawr Oiw, and
Ba side fine are acted.
'llm engimetbg dta.,and spec�aatkne
stall rreet starWards estabfihdd in Rod
amen[CaM,nna Mdaaal on W rm➢nd&
Cormollkuice
Final.11ecember 2010 4-17 Mitigation Monitoring&Reponing Progtam
100 Environinaml Impact Report
Bay Bndge Pump Slation and Force Mains Replacement Project
This page intensionally left blank.
Final.December 2017 418 Mitigation Monitoring&Reponing Progtam