HomeMy WebLinkAbout98.06-12-2019 Administration Committee Item 3 Attachment 2 - Pretreatment Program Annual Report.pdf i I. /V/r��nVi�� 1
0
ow
cm
0^ �t
CL I t *'.,-
o� cc ~ : —
zLu
� w �
M °C ..� o
W W 14-..
T O 1
W II � II'�II
T ca 1�
O ., /
.W.
/Ii l
POTW PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
NPDES Permit Holder: Orange County Sanitation District
Report Due Date: October 31, 2018
Period Covered by this Report: July 2017 through June 2018
Period Covered by Previous Report: July 2016 through June 2017'
Name of Wastewater Treatment Plant(s): Reclamation Plant No. 1, and Treatment
Plant No. 2
NPDES Permit Number: CA0110604
Person to contact concerning information contained in this report:
• Name: Roya Sohanaki
• Title: Engineering Manager, Resource Protection Division
• Mailing Address: 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018
• Telephone: (714) 593-7437
"1 certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible forgathering the information,
the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility
of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations."
October 30, 2018
Date Engineering Manager, Resource Protection Division
See Annual Report 2016-17,Orange County Sanitation District,submitted to EPA Region 9 and California Regional Water Quality
Control Board,Santa Ana Region.
Serving. Orange County Sanitation District
Anaheim 10844 Ellis Avenue,Fountain Valley,CA 92708
714.962,2411 • www.ocsd.com
Brea October 30, 2018
Buena Park
Hope A. Smythe, Executive Officer
cypress California Regional Water Quality Control Board
Santa Ana Region
Fountain Valley 3737 Main Street, Suite 500
Riverside, CA 92501-3339
Fullerton
Garden Grove Subject: Board Order No. R8-2012-0035, NPDES No. CA0110604
FY 2017/18 Pretreatment Program Annual Report
Huntington Beach
In accordance with the requirements of NPDES Permit No. CA0110604, attached please find
Irvine the FY 2017/18 Pretreatment Program Annual Report which provides information on the
Orange County Sanitation District's(OCSD) pretreatment program for the period July 1, 2017
La Habra through June 30, 2018.
La Palma The attached annual report provides an update on the status of OCSD's pretreatment program
in achieving its requirements and objectives. Information is also provided on how the program
Los Alamitos is administered, the resources used to manage the program, the compliance status of
industrial users, and the impact of source control efforts on wastewater and biosolids quality.
Newport Beach
Orange Some of the program's highlights for this fiscal year are summarized below:
' The program has Continued to effectively reduce heavy metals discharges. Since
Placentia 1976177, the total mass of heavy metals entering OCSD's system has decreased by
85%while the mass of metals discharged to the marine environment has decreased
Santa Ana by 99%. The influent heavy metals to OCSD's treatment plants meet our NPDES
effluent standards before wastewater treatment has occurred.
Seal Beach
' During FY 2017/18. 1,192 inspections of industrial facilities were conducted, and
Stanton 3,406 samples were collected for analysis. In addition to warning notices and self-
monitoring notices of violation, 193 separate enforcement actions were taken against
Tustin noncompliant industries in FY 2017/18, including compliance meetings and
inspections, and the issuance of fees, penalties,enforcement orders and
Villa Park administrative complaint settlements. A total of$140,348.80 in noncompliance fees
and penalties were assessed.
County of Orange
' During FY 2017/18, OCSD continued its oversight of IRWD's and SAWPA's pre-
Costa Mesa treatment programs. Information on IRWD and SAWPA can be found in Chapter 8
Sanitary District and Appendices G and H of this report.
Midway City Should you have any questions regarding the information provided in the report, or wish to meet
Sanitary District with OCSD staff to discuss the report in more detail, please contact me at your convenience at
(714) 593-7437,
Irvine Ranch
Water DistrictYorb
Water Linda Royal Sohanaki, PE
Water Linda Y
Engineering Manager, Resource Protection Division
HTG:lam
c: EPA Region 9, CWA Compliance Office
SWRCB Pretreatment Program Manager
Submitted electronically to cmgs.waterboards.ca.gov,
R9pmtmatment@epa gov,and NPDES_Wastewaler@walerboards.cz.gov
Our Mission: To protect public health and the environment by
providing effective wastewater collection, treatment, and recycling.
Serving: Orange County Sanitation District
Anaheim 10844 Ellis Avenue,Fountain Valley,CA 92708
714.962.2411 • www.ocsd.com
Brea
Buena Park
Cypress October 30,2018
Fountain Valley
Hope A. Smythe, Executive Officer
Fullerton California Regional Water Quality Control Board
Santa Ana Region
Garden Grove 3737 Main Street, Suite 500
Riverside, CA 92501-3339
Huntington Beach
Subject: Board Order No. R8-2012-0035, NPDES No. CA011D604
Irvine Pretreatment Program Semi-Annual Report for the Period of January 1
La Habra through June 30, 2018
La Palma As authorized by NPDES Permit No. CA0110604, the Pretreatment Program Semi-Annual
Report information for January 1 through June 30, 2018 has been submitted as part of the
Los Alamitos Orange County Sanitation District's(OCSD)pretreatment program Annual Report for the
period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. Enforcement action and compliance status
Newport Beach information has been divided into appropriate six-month summaries.
Orange
Should you have any questions regarding the information provided in the report, or wish to
Placentia meet with OCSD staff to discuss the report in more detail, please contact me at your
convenience at(714) 593-7437,
Santa Ana
Seal Beach
Stanton �
Tustin Roya Schanaki, PE
Villa Park Engineering Manager, Resource Protection Division
County of Orange HTG:Iam
c: EPA Region 9, CWA Compliance Office
Costa Mesa SWRCB Pretreatment Program Manager
Sanitary District Submitted electronically to civpswalerboards.ca gov.
R9pretreatment@epa gov.and NPDES Wastewater@waterboards.ca.low
Midway City
Sanitary District
Irvine Ranch
Water District
Yorba Linda
Water District
Our Mission: To protect public health and the environment by
providing effective wastewater collection, treatment, and recycling.
ANNUAL REPORT 2018
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018
(714) 962-2411
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM
Letter of Transmittal
Certification
Table of Contents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix
List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiii
List of Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
E.1 BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E.1
E.2 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E.1
E.2.1 Pretreatment Program Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E.2
E.2.2 Pretreatment Program Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E.3
E.2.3 Compliance with NPDES Discharge Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . EA
chapter 1
NPDES REQUIREMENTS - PRETREATMENT
1.1 PRETREATMENT REQUIREMENTS—COMPLIANCE
WITH NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION
SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1
chapter 2
OCSD'S FACILITIES AND COMPLIANCE WITH
DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS
2.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1
2.2 EXISTING OCSD FACILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2
2.2.1 Description of Treatment Plants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(c n6'nued)
Page
2.2.1.1 Reclamation Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2
2.2.1.2 Treatment Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3
2.2.1.3 Joint Works Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.6
2.3 COMPLIANCE WITH NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.6
2.4 EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.8
2.4.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.8
2.4.2 Suspended Solids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.8
2.4.3 Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD-C). . . . . . . . . . . 2.8
2.4.4 Oil and Grease. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.8
2.4.5 Settleable Solids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.9
2.4.6 Turbidity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.9
2.4.7 pH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.9
2.4.8 Toxicity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.10
2.5 FACILITIES SPECIAL PROJECTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.11
2.5.1 Odor& Corrosion Control Chemical Dosing Stations . . . . . . . . . . . 2.11
2.5.2 Plant No. 1 Trickling Filters Bleach Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.11
2.5.3 Collections System Reliant Wizard Testing....................................... 2.11
2.6 METALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.11
2.7 MASS EMISSION BENCHMARKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.12
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(con6nued)
Page
chapter 3
PERMITS
3.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1
3.2 PERMIT CLASSIFICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1
3.3 PERMIT ISSUANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2
3.3.1 Identification of New Permittees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3
3.4 DISCHARGE LIMITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3
3.4.1 Industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3
3.4.2 Waslehaulers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.4
3.5 ESTABLISHING MASS EMISSION RATES (MFR) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.5
chapter
INSPECTION, SAMPLING, COMPLIANCE, ENFORCEMENT
4.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1
4.2 ROUTINE SAMPLING AND INSPECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1
4.3 NON-ROUTINE SAMPLING AND INSPECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2
4.3.1 Downstream Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2
4.4 ORANGE COUNTY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
STRIKE FORCE AND JOINT AGENCY INSPECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.3
4.5 INDUSTRIAL COMPLIANCE STATUS WITH
DISCHARGE LIMITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.3
4.5.1 Industries in Significant Noncompliance (SNC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.3
4.6 ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(c n6'nued)
Page
4.6.1 Compliance Inspections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5
4.6.2 Compliance Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5
4.6.3 Compliance Requirement Letters...................................................... 4.5
4.6.4 Order to Cease(rerminate Non-Compliance/Discharge.................... 4.5
4.6.5 Notices of Violation—Noncompliance Fees, Penalties . . . . . . . . . . . 4.6
4.6.6 Probation Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.6
4.6.7 Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.6
4.6.8 Regulatory Compliance Schedule Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.7
4.6.9 Administrative Complaints, Penalties, and Settlement Agreements . 4.7
4.6.10 Permit Suspensions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.7
4.6.11 Permit Revocations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.7
4.6.12 Emergency Suspension Order . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.8
4.6.13 Civil/Criminal Complaints. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.8
4.7 ENFORCEMENT SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.8
chapter 5
RESERVED FOR FUTURE REPORTING
chapter 6
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STAFFING, COSTS, AND
FIELD EQUIPMENT
6.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.1
6.2 STAFFING, REVENUES, AND COSTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.1
6.2.1 Staffing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.1
6.2.2 Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.1
IV
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(con6nued)
Page
6.2.3 Program Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.1
6.3 FIELD EQUIPMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.2
6.3.1 Equipment Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.2
chapter
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STATUS
7.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.1
7.2 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.1
7.3 WASTEHAULER PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.1
7.3.1 Wastehauler Permitting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.1
7.3.2 Wastehauler Discharges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.1
7.3.3 Wastehauler Monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.3
7.4 INSPECTION AND SAMPLING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.3
7.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY
CONTROL (QA/QC)ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.3
7.5.1 QA/QC Program Tasks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.3
7.5.2 QA/QC Sampling Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.5
7.5.3 Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.7
7.6 TOTAL TOXIC ORGANICS WAIVER PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.8
7.7 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMIT PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.12
7.7.1 Metrics and Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.13
7.7.2 SPDP Program Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.13
7.7.3 SPDP Regulatory Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.13
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(c n6'nued)
Page
7.8 SELF-MONITORING PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.13
7.9 INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.14
7.10 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN OPERATING THE
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.14
chapter 8
INTERACTION WITH OTHER AGENCIES
8.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.1
8.2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 18 AND 19 FLOW
ACCOMODATION AGREEMENT................................................................... 8.1
8.3 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT (IRWD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.1
8.3.1 IRWD Operating Permit, Regional Board Order 2015-0024 . . . . . . . . . . . 8.2
8.3.2 IRWD Analytical Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.2
8.3.3 Inorganic Pollutants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.3
8.3.4 Organic Pollutants.................................................................................... 8.5
8.3.5 Report of Upset, Pass-Through and
Interference Events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.6
8.3.6 Discussion of the List of Industrial Users . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.6
8.3.7 Discussion of Industrial User Compliance Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.9
8.3.8 Summary of SIU Compliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.9
8.3.9 Discussion of Significant Changes in the
Pretreatment Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.9
8.3.10 Pretreatment Program Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.9
8.3.11 Equipment Purchases for FY 2017118 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.10
8.3.12 Discussion of Public Participation Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.11
8.3.13 Discussion of Sludge Disposal Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.11
A
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(con6nued)
Page
8.3.14 I RW D Additional Information.................................................................... 8.11
8.4 SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY (SAWPA) ........................ 8.13
8.4.1 Brine Line System Pretreatment Program Overview................................. 8.14
8.4.2 SAWPA, Member Agency, and Contract Agency Pretreatment Programs 8.15
8.4.2.1 Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD)................................ 8.15
8.4.2.2 Inland Empire Utilities Agency(IEUA)....................................... 8.16
8.4.2.3 Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD)............................. 8.19
8.4.2.4 San Bernardino Municipal Water Department (SBMWD).......... 8.20
8.4.2.5 San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (Valley)........... 8.20
8.4.2.6 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority(SAWPA)................... 8.21
8.4.2.7 Western Municipal Water District(WMWD).............................. 8.22
8.4.2.8 Yucaipa Valley Water District (YVWD) ..................................... 8.24
8.4.3 Self-Monitoring Program, Field Inspection, Sampling and
Monitoring QA/QC .................................................................... 8.25
8.4.4 Identification of New Permittees........................................................ 8.25
8.4.5 SAWPA Member and Contract Agency Ordinances and
Resolutions ....................................................................................... 8.27
8.4.6 Permittees in Significant Noncompliance (SNC)................................ 8.28
8.4.7 Non-Industrial Source Control and Public Education Programs......... 8.28
8.4.8 Changes to the SAWPA Pretreatment Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.30
8.4.9 Pretreatment Program Budget and Staffing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.33
8.4.10 Equipment Inventory Listing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.34
8.4.11 SAWPA Pretreatment Program Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.34
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(c n6'nued)
Page
chapter 9
SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
9.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.1
9.2 BIOSOLIDS QUALITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.1
chapter 10
NON-INDUSTRIAL SOURCE CONTROL AND PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAMS
10.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.1
10.2 FATS, OILS, AND GREASE (FOG) CONTROL PROGRAMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.1
10.2.1 Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) Control............................................... 10.1
10.3 RADIATOR SHOPS ........................................................................................ 10.5
10.4 DRY CLEANERS............................................................................................. 10.5
10.5 URBAN RUNOFF............................................................................................ 10.7
10.5.1 Dry Weather Diversion Systems and Urban Runoff Flow.................. 10.8
10.5.2 Proposed Urban Runoff Diversion Systems...................................... 10.11
10.5.3 Dry Weather Urban Runoff Quality................................................... 10.11
10.5.4 Urban Runoff Diversion Locations..................................................... 10.13
10.6 DENTAL AMALGAM ....................................................................................... 10.13
10.7 PUBLIC EDUCATION ..................................................................................... 10.14
10.7.1 California Water Environment Association........................................ 10.14
10.7.2 Industrial Environmental Coalition of Orange County........................ 10.14
viii
LIST OF TABLES
Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
chapter 1
NPDES REQUIREMENTS — PRETREATMENT
chapter 2
OCSD'S FACILITIES AND COMPLIANCE WITH
DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS
Table 2.1 Average Daily Influent and Effluent Flow in Million
Gallons Per Day (MGD), Fiscal Years 1997-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2
Table 2.2 NPDES Permit Discharge Requirements and OCSD's
Annual Average Influent and Final Effluent Discharge
Values for Fiscal Year 2017-18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.7
Table 2.3 Suspended Solids and BOD-C Annual Average Daily
Influent and Final Effluent for Fiscal Years 2012-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . 2.8
Table 2.4 Settleable Solids, Turbidity, and pH, Average Final
Effluent for Fiscal Years 2012-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.9
Table 2.5 Final Effluent Yearly Average Toxicity Values for
Fiscal Years 2013-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.10
Table 2.6 Average Metal Concentrations and Mass in the Influent
and Effluent for Fiscal Years 2014-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.12
Table 2.7 Mass Emissions for All Benchmark Constituents,
Fiscal Year 2017-18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.14
chapter
PERMITS
Table 3.1 OCSD's Maximum Allowable Discharge Limits in
Milligrams Per Liter (mg/L) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.4
ix
LIST OF TABLES
(mnUnued)
Page
Table 3.2 OCSD's Maximum Allowable Discharge Limits in
Milligrams Per Liter (mg/L) (Wastehaulers) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.4
chapter 4
INSPECTION, SAMPLING, COMPLIANCE, ENFORCEMENT
Table 4.1 Summary of Inspections, Sampling, and Laboratory
Analyses, Fiscal Years 2013-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2
Table 4.2 Summary of Companies in Significant Noncompliance
(SNC), Fiscal Year 2017-18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.4
chapter 5
RESERVED FOR FUTURE REPORTING
chapter 6
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STAFFING,
COSTS, AND FIELD EQUIPMENT
Table 6.1 Summary of Total Costs and Total Labor Hours for the
Pretreatment Program, Fiscal Years 2013-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.2
Table 6.2 Current Inventory of Major Equipment for the
Pretreatment Program for Fiscal Year 2017-18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.2
chapter 7
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STATUS
Table 7.1 Summary of Wastehauler Loads and Gallons Discharged into
Plant No. 1 Disposal Station, Fiscal Years 2013-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . T2
Table 7.2 Summary of Wastehauler Load Types Discharged into
Plant No. 1 Disposal Station, Fiscal Year 2017-18. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T2
Table 7.3 Summary of Wastehauler Grease Wastewater Loads into
Plant No. 1 Disposal Station, Fiscal Years 2013-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.3
Table 7.4 Equipment Blank Sampling Results, Fiscal Year 2017-18 . . . . . . . . . 7.5
Table 7.5 QA/QC Evaluation of Archived Samples, Fiscal Year 2017-18 . . . . . 7.6
x
LIST OF TABLES
(con6nued)
Page
Table 7.6 QA/QC Collection Checks, Samples and Sampler Average
Deviations, Fiscal Year 2017-18. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.7
Table 7.7 Permiltees with TTOs Waivers, July 1, 2017—June 30, 2018 . . . . . 7.9
chapter 8
INTERACTION WITH OTHER AGENCIES
Table 8.1 Class I Industries Within Irvine Ranch Water District
Revenue Areas 7 and 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.7
Table 8.2 Summary of Irvine Ranch Water District
Pretreatment Program Costs, 2016-17 and 2017-18. . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.10
Table 8.3 Summary of Irvine Ranch Water District Pretreatment
Equipment, Fiscal Year 2017-18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.10
Table 8.4 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority—Summary of Pretreatment
Equipment for Fiscal Year 2017-18................................................... 8.34
chapter
SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Table 9.1 Trends in Trace Metal Content of Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 2009-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.1
chapter 10
NON-INDUSTRIAL SOURCE CONTROL AND PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAMS
Table 10.1 NISC Programs, Fiscal Year 2017-18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.1
Table 10.2 FSEs by Category, Fiscal Year 2017-18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.3
Table 10.3 FSE Monitoring Reports, Fiscal Year 2017-18. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.3
Table 10.4 FSE Compliance Inspection Activities, Fiscal Year 2017-18 . . . . . . . 10.4
Table 10.5 FOG Control Program Effectiveness, Fiscal Year 2017-18. . . . . . . . 10.4
Table 10.6 Radiator Shops Program, Fiscal Year 2017-18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.5
A
LIST OF TABLES
(mnUnued)
Page
Table 10.7 Dry Cleaner Inventory, Fiscal Year 2017-18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.6
Table 10.8 Dry Cleaner Certification Activity, Fiscal Year 2017-18 . . . . . . . . . . . 10.7
Table 10.9 Dry Weather Urban Runoff Discharges
Fiscal Years 2012-2018. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.8
Table 10.10 Average Urban Runoff Discharge Volume by Diversion,
Fiscal Year 2017-18.......................................................................... 10.9
Table 10.11 Urban Runoff Program, Fiscal Year 2017-18.................................... 10.11
Table 10.12 Urban Runoff Compliance, Fiscal Year 2017-18............................... 10.12
xii
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Figure E-S-1 Average Effluent Total Heavy Metals and Flow
for Past Fiscal Years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E.2
chapter
NPDES REQUIREMENTS — PRETREATMENT
chapter
OCSD'S FACILITIES AND COMPLIANCE WITH
DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS
Figure 2-1 Map of Orange County Sanitation District's
Service Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.5
chapter
PERMITS
chapter
INSPECTION, SAMPLING, ENFORCEMENT
chapter
RESERVED FOR FUTURE REPORTING
chapter 6
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STAFFING,
COSTS, AND FIELD EQUIPMENT
chapter
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STATUS
chapter
INTERACTION WITH OTHER AGENCIES
Figure 8-1 Michelson Water Recycling Plant Effluent Total
Dissolved Solids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.3
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
(wn6'nued)
Page
Figure 8-2 Michelson Water Recycling Plant Influent
and Effluent Heavy Metals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.4
Figure 8-3 Michelson Water Recycling Plant Influent
and Effluent Copper. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.5
Figure 8-4 Michelson Water Recycling Plant Influent
and Effluent Zinc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.5
Figure 8-5 Michelson Water Recycling Plant Influent
and Effluent Total Toxic Organics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.6
Figure 8-6 Michelson Water Recycling Plant Influent Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.11
Figure 8-7 Michelson Water Recycling Plant Influent and Effluent Selenium . . . 8.12
chapter 9
SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Figure 9-1 Trends in Concentrations of Arsenic in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1993-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.6
Figure 9-2 Trends in Concentrations of Cadmium in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1993-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.6
Figure 9-3 Trends in Concentrations of Chromium in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1993-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.7
Figure 9-4 Trends in Concentrations of Copper in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1993-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.7
Figure 9-5 Trends in Concentrations of Lead in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1993-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.8
Figure 9-6 Trends in Concentrations of Mercury in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1993-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.8
Figure 9-7 Trends in Concentrations of Molybdenum in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1993-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.9
Figure 9-8 Trends in Concentrations of Nickel in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1993-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.9
Figure 9-9 Trends in Concentrations of Selenium in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1993-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.10
xiv
Figure 9-10 Trends in Concentrations of Zinc in Biosolids,
Fiscal Years 1993-2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.10
chapter 10
NON-INDUSTRIAL SOURCE CONTROL AND PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAMS
xv
LIST OF APPENDICES
appendix a
MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE STATUS REPORT
appendix b
SUMMARY OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS AND TRACE CONSTITUENTS
ANALYSES
appendix c
PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
appendix d
FEES/PENALTIES FOR NON-COMPLIANCES
appendix e
PUBLIC NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANTLY NON-COMPLIANT INDUSTRIES
appendix f
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
appendix g
IRWD SAMPLING
appendix h
SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY (SAWPA) REPORTS, DATA
AND SNC NOTICE
appendix i
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS
appendix j
PERMITTEES WITH PRETREATMENT EQUIPMENT
xvi
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Background
Introduction
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
E.1 BACKGROUND
Recognizing the need to control the quality and quantity of wastewaters discharged to the
sewerage system, in February 1954, OCSD's Boards of Directors adopted the first Ordinance
regulating the use of the sewerage system. This Ordinance was subsequently revised and
amended in February 1958, April 1970, July 1976, July 1983, September 1989, February 1992,
July 1998, July 2008, and October 2009. The 1970 revision formally established OCSD's
Industrial Waste Division to issue permits, set flow and quality limits, and monitor and inspect
industrial discharges to the sewerage system. Substances monitored and regulated included: oil
and grease of mineral and petroleum origin, organic materials, dissolved solids, suspended
solids, phenolic compounds, radioactive wastes, combustible materials, and any other
contaminants that had the potential to degrade wastewater treatment processes or cause
problems in the sewerage facilities. In July 1976, the Ordinance was revised to include heavy
metal limits.
In July 1983, the Ordinance was further amended to include enforcement of the EPA's Federal
categorical limits and to modify OCSD's local discharge limits for cadmium, copper,
polychlorinated biphenyls, pesticides, and total toxic organics. OCSD's pretreatment program
was approved by the EPA in January 1984. In September 1989, the Ordinance was revised to
streamline administrative and enforcement procedures, incorporate EPA regulations adopted
since 1983, clarify the intent of the program through added definitions and procedures, and
include special purpose discharge permit requirements and conditions. In February 1992, the
Ordinance was amended to revise defined terms, initiate noncompliance sampling fees, and
include language giving OCSD authority to levy administrative penalties according to changes to
state law enacted in January 1992. In July 1998, revisions were made primarily for the deletion of
Class III permits, which were issued for the collection of user charges for the discharge of
domestic waste. In July 2008, revisions were made regarding the application of tax credits for
user charges, and to include dry weather urban runoff permit requirements and conditions. In
October 2009, the Ordinance was revised to provide clarification regarding transfer of permit
ownership. The most recent revision was adopted in February 2016, and became effective in
July 2016, updating the local limits among other sections of the Ordinance.
E.2 INTRODUCTION
The fiscal year(FY)2017/18 OCSD Annual Report provides the following:
• Information about the industrial pretreatment program as required by OCSD's National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region (CRWQCB) and the
Environmental Protection Agency(EPA); and
• Information on how OCSD's pretreatment program is administered; industrial permittees'
compliance status; discharger's effect on OCSD's influent, effluent, and biosolids; the
labor, equipment, and capital resources used for the program during the fiscal year; and
other documentation.
E.1
—Total Efflwnt Heavy
Metals
2500 500
2000 400
I
It
S 1500 300 M
do G d 1000 200 ID
a
y
500 100
0 0
77 80 82 85 88 91 94 97 00 03 06 09 12 15 18
Figure ES-1 Average Effluent Total Heavy Metals and Flows for Past Fiscal Years
Orange County Sanitation District
E.2.1 Pretreatment Program Summary
Control of Pollutants
Since FY 1976/77, while Orange County's population has grown, the pretreatment program has
been successful in reducing the average daily pounds of metals entering OCSD's system by 85%
and metals discharged to the marine environment by 99%. Over this time, individual effluent
metals including cadmium, chromium, copper, silver, and lead have been reduced by over 99%;
nickel by 96%; and zinc by 97%. Long-term trends of effluent heavy metals show a steady
decline since FY 1977(see Figure ES-1).
OCSD's pretreatment program has been effective in reducing the toxic priority pollutants
discharged to the sewerage system. It has also been effective in protecting the collection,
treatment, and disposal facilities from incidents of pass-through or interference, and it has
enabled OCSD to meet its NPDES ocean discharge limits. The quality of OCSD's influent,
effluent, and biosolids are evidence of the program's progress.
Permits
During FY 2017/18, OCSD administered 544 active permits, of which 336 were Class I permits,
21 Class 11 permits, 41 Wastehauler permits, 60 Special Purpose permits, 21 Urban Runoff
permits, 39 FOG (Fat, Oil, and Grease) permits, and 23 zero discharge certifications. This level
of permit activity represents no significant change compared to the total number of active permits
at the end of the previous fiscal year. Of the 336 Class I users, 190 were subject to Federal
Categorical Pretreatment Standards.
E.2
Program Costs
The pretreatment program is funded by industrial permit fees, noncompliance sampling fees, and
collection of user charges. The pretreatment program operating expenditures for the fiscal year,
including laboratory analyses, totaled $6,044,009. A total revenue of $22,395,137 in sewer use
charge payments was received and $140,348.80 in noncompliance fees and penalties, and
Significant Noncompliance (SNC) reporting and publication fees were invoiced through the
pretreatment program.
Inspection. Sampling, and Enforcement
OCSD performed 1,192 industrial inspections during the fiscal year, with the collection of 3406
samples. Sixty-three (63) compliance inspections and eighteen (18) compliance meetings were
held with dischargers in order to identify and assess noncompliance problems, and propose long-
term solutions. OCSD conducted five covert downstream sampling projects. Four(4)companies
(<2%) of the 336 active permittees (in FY 2017118) listed in the Monitoring and Compliance
Status report were determined to be in SNC and their names were published in the newspaper.
Significant Changes in Operating the Pretreatment Program
There were no significant changes to the OCSD Pretreatment Program during FY 2017/18.
E.2.2 Pretreatment Program Elements
OCSD administers several different program elements designed to meet the goal of controlling
discharges from industrial sources. These have a direct influence on OCSD's ability to meet
federal, ocean discharge, biosolids reuse and disposal, and water reclamation requirements.
Public Participation
OCSD published those industries that were in significant non-compliance in the local newspaper.
Resource Protection Division staff routinely attend outside agency/association meetings,
conferences, and workshops; serve on committees; and give presentations. Working with other
agencies and associations benefits OCSD by keeping abreast of potential future regulation and
trends which may be beneficial or have impacts that OCSD must prepare for, as well as providing
information to the public about OCSD's programs. Please see Chapter 10 for more information.
Wastehauler Program
At this report date, 41 wastehauler companies are under permit with OCSD, which have a total of
132 trucks. During the past fiscal year, 12.1 million gallons of waste were discharged by
permitted wastehaulers at the Plant No. 1 Wastehauler Station.
Total Toxics Organics Waiver Program
Permittees who have not shown detectable levels of Total Toxic Organics (TTOs) based on their
wastewater discharge analytical data for at least one year are eligible to waive the self-monitoring
requirement if they can certify that TTOs are not used or present at their facility. For FY 2017118
OCSD granted 125 companies TTO waivers.
E.3
Industrial Operations and Maintenance Improvement Program
The ongoing trend in industrial permittee discharge violations have shown that most cases are
due to inadequate operations and maintenance of industry's pretreatment systems as well as
industrial operator error. This was recognized years ago, when the U.S. EPA audit findings of
1998 recommended that OCSD develop and implement an industrial operations and
improvement program. In 1999/2000, OCSD developed a plan that included outreach and
operator training, and enforcement of requirements for operator and operations and maintenance
practices which is still in effect today.
In 2018, OCSD conducted an advanced training course for industrial wastewater treatment
(pretreatment) operators currently employed by facilities holding a Class I Wastewater Discharge
Permit. The course was conducted by an engineering services company (selected via bid
process for a five-year contract in 2014). OCSD provided this training, free of charge, to assist
permittees to obtain and retain a qualified pretreatment operator and to reduce or eliminate
noncompliance due to operation and maintenance and/or operator problems. The training course
consisted of two 4.5-hour classes and a follow-up wastewater audit at the operator facility to
ensure proper implementation of operation and maintenance practices. Those class participants
that attended both classes, passed the exam and quizzes, and successfully fulfilled the audit
requirements,will receive Certificates of Completion.
Non-Industrial Source Control Program
The purpose of OCSD's Non-Industrial Source Control (NISC) Program is to promote and
implement the application of waste management strategies and practices that will reduce or
eliminate the generation of waste at the source, thereby reducing the volume and toxicity of waste
streams entering OCSD's sewerage system. The NISC Program also addresses non-industrial
pollution sources in our light industrial, commercial, and residential discharger community, more
details are available in Chapter 10.
E.2.3 Compliance with NPDES Discharge Requirements
There were no plant upsets, interference, or pass-through incidents attributable to industrial users
in FY 2017118.
EA
chapter 1
NPDES REQUIREMENTS - PRETREATMENT
Pretreatment Requirements - Compliance with National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Requirements
chapter 1
NPDES REQUIREMENTS - PRETREATMENT
1.1 PRETREATMENT REQUIREMENTS - COMPLIANCE WITH NATIONAL
POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
This section is a summary of the pretreatment program requirements contained in OCSD's NPDES
Permit No. CA0110604, Order No. R8-2012-0035, effective July 20, 2012, jointly issued by the
CRWQCB and EPA Region IX. The requirements for the industrial pretreatment program are listed in
Section VI (C)(4)(c) and Attachment E of the Permit. The requirements are shown below (in bold
italics) using the appropriate numeration found in the permit. Each requirement is followed by a
summary of the activity that has resulted in OCSD's compliance with the permit requirements, or a
reference may be given where additional information can be found in this annual report.
NPDES Section VI. Provisions, C. Special Provisions, 4. Special Provisions for
Municipal Facilities (POTWs Only), c. Pretreatment Program Requirements
(2) The Discharger shall implement and enforce its approved pretreatment program, and all
subsequent revisions, which are hereby made enforceable conditions of this
Order/Permit. The Discharger shall enforce the requirements promulgated pursuant to
Clean Water Act (Cl Sections 307(b), 307(c), 307(d), and 402(b) with timely,
appropriate and effective enforcement actions. The Discharger shall cause all
nondomestic users subject to federal categorical standards to achieve compliance no
later than the date specified in those requirements, or, in the case of a new
nondomestic user, upon commencement of discharge.
OCSD has an ongoing commitment to meet the provisions of this requirement, and all
pretreatment requirements are enforced as discussed in Chapter 4 of this report. The
Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance) contains specific provisions for new
dischargers that are more stringent than those required by 40 CFR 403.
The ongoing quarterly inspection, sampling, and monitoring program for each Class I
permittee (Significant Industrial User) ensures compliance with federal, state, and local
regulations. The compliance statuses of all permittees subject to federal categorical
standards are shown in the Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring & Compliance
Status, presented in Appendix A of this report.
(3) The Discharger shall perform the pretreatment functions required by 40 CFR Part 403,
including,but not limited to:
(a) Implement the necessary legal authorities as required by 40 CFR 403.8(0(1).
The legal authorities are contained in OCSD's July 1983 Regulations for Use of
District Sewerage Facilities (Ordinance) which were approved by EPA in January
1984, and affirmed during the May 1986 audit. Revised Wastewater Discharge
Regulations ordinances were adopted and became effective September 8, 1989,
February 7, 1992, July 1, 1998, July 1, 2008 October 1, 2009, and most recently on
July 1, 2016.
1.1
(b) Enforce the pretreatment requirements under 40 CFR 403.5 and 403.6.
The requirements to enforce and implement National Pretreatment Standards for
general prohibitions and specific industrial subcategories are contained in OCSD's
Ordinance. Chapter 4 of this report describes OCSD's enforcement efforts for FY
2017/18.
(c) Implement the programmatic functions as required by 40 CFR 403.8(0(2).
The required functions include the identification, quantification, permitting, and
enforcement of the standards set forth in OCSD's Ordinance. Chapters 3 and 4 of
this report describe the permitting and enforcement efforts for FY 2017/18.
(d) Provide the requisite funding and personnel to implement the pretreatment
program as provided in 40 CFR 403.8(0(3).
The pretreatment program is funded by industrial permit fees, noncompliance
sampling fees, and sewer use charges. The pretreatment program's operating
expenditures for FY 2017/18, including laboratory analyses, total $6,044,009.
Chapter 6 of this report provides additional details.
(4) By October 31 of each year, the Discharger shall submit an annual pretreatment report
to the Regional Water Board, US EPA, the State Water Board's Division of Water
Quality-Regulations Unit, and the Orange County Department of Health Services'
Hazardous Materials Division, describing its pretreatment activities over the previous
fiscal year(July 1 through June 30). In the event the Discharger is not in compliance
with any condition or requirement of this Orden Permit, or any pretreatment compliance
inspection/audit requirements, the Discharger shall include the reasons for
noncompliance and state how and when it will comply with such conditions and
requirements. The annual report shall contain, but not be limited to, the following
information:
(a) A summary of analytical results from representative, flow-proportioned, 24-hour
composite sampling of the Discharger's influent and effluent for those
pollutants US EPA has identified under CWA section 307(a) which are known or
suspected to be discharged by nondomestic users. Representative grab
sampling shall be employed for pollutants that may degrade after collection, or
where the use of automatic sampling equipment may otherwise result in
unrepresentative sampling; such pollutants include, but are not limited to,
cyanide, oil and grease, volatile organic compounds, chlorine, phenol, sulfide,
pH, and temperature. Wastewater sampling and analysis shall be performed in
accordance with the minimum frequency of analysis required by the MRP
(Attachment El. The Discharger shall also provide influent and effluent
monitoring data for non-priority pollutants, which the Discharger believes may
be causing or contributing to interference or pass through. The Discharger is
not required to sample and analyze for asbestos. Sludge sampling and analysis
is addressed elsewhere in this OrderlPem it Wastewater sampling and
analysis shall be performed in accordance with 40 CFR 136.
The influent, effluent, and biosolids sampling information is provided in Chapters 2
and 9, and Appendix B of this annual report.
(b) A discussion of upset, interference, or pass through, if any, at the Discharger's
facilities, which the Discharger knows or suspects were caused by
nondomestic users of the POTW system. The discussion shall include the
1.2
reasons why the incidents occurred, any corrective actions taken, and, if
known, the name and address of the responsible nondomestic user(s). The
discussion shall also include a review of the applicable local pollutant
limitations to determine whether any additional limitations, or changes to
existing limitations, are necessary to prevent pass-through, interference, or
noncompliance with sludge disposal requirements.
There were no plant upsets, interference, or pass-through incidents attributable to
industrial users in FY 2017/18.
(c) An updated list of the Discharger's SIUs including their names and addresses,
and a list of deletions, additions and SIU name changes keyed to the previously
submitted list. The Discharger shall provide a brief explanation for each
change. The list shall identify the SIUs subject to federal categorical standards
by specifying which set(s) of standards are applicable to each SIU. The list
shall also indicate which SIUs are subject to local limitations.
Appendix A of this report, the Monitoring and Compliance Status Report, is an
updated list of significant industrial users which identifies which local or set of
categorical standards applies.
(d) The Discharger shall characterize the compliance status of each SIU by
providing a list or table for the following:
Name of SIU;
Category, If subject to categorical standards;
Type of wastewater treatment or control processes In place;
Number of samples taken by SIU during the year;
Number of samples and inspections by Discharger during the year;
For an SIU subject to discharge requirements for total toxic organics,
whether all required certifications were provided;
A list of pretreatment standards (categorical or local) violated during the
year, or any other violations;
SIUs in significant noncompliance (SNC) as defined at 40 CFR
403.8(f)(2)(vifi), at anytime during the year;
A summary of enforcement actions or any other actions taken against SIUs
during the year. Describe the type of action, final compliance date, and the
amount of fines and/or penalties collected, if any. Describe any proposed
actions for bringing SIUs into compliance.
This annual report contains all of the items listed above. SIU names, categories,
number of samples and inspections, violations, and SNC status are shown in
Appendix A. SIU wastewater treatment is shown in Appendix J, Total Toxic Organic
waivers are shown in Chapter 7, and enforcement actions are shown in Chapter 4 and
Appendix D.
1.3
(a) A brief description of any programs the Discharger implements to reduce
pollutants from nondomestic users not classified as SIUs.
The activities for OCSD's non-industrial source control and pollution prevention
programs are discussed in Chapters 7 and 10.
(t) A brief description of any significant changes in operating the pretreatment
program which differ from the previous year, including, but not limited to,
changes in the program's administrative structure, local limits, monitoring
program,legal authority, enforcement policy, funding, and staffing levels.
The description of significant changes to the pretreatment program, if any, are
discussed in Chapter 7.
(g) A summary of the annual pretreatment program budget, including the cost of
pretreatment program functions and equipment purchases.
For FY 2017/18, the operating expenses for the pretreatment program were
approximately$6,044,009. Additional information on pretreatment program costs and
purchases are shown in Chapter 6 of this report.
(h) A summary of activities to Involve and Inform the public of the pretreatment
program, including a copy of the newspaper notice, if any, required by 40 CFR
403.8(0(2)(vh)(sic].
A copy of the significant non-compliance notice (SNC) for newspaper publication can
be found in Appendix E.
(i) A description of any changes in sludge disposal methods.
Biosolids information can be found in Chapter 9 of this report.
Q) A description of the program to quantify, characterize, regulate, and treat now
from low-flow urban runoff diversion systems and "first flush"industrial storm
water diversion systems that are routed to the sanitary sewer collection system.
Information on OCSD's urban runoff program is shown in Chapter 10 of this report.
(k) A discussion of any concerns not described elsewhere in the annual report.
There were no concems for FY 2017/18.
(6) Nonindustrial Source Control Program and Public Education Program
The Discharger shall continue to develop and implement its nonindustrial source
control program and public education program. The purpose of these programs is to
eliminate the entrance of nonindustrial toxic pollutants and pesticides into the POTW.
The nonindustrial source control program will be supplemented with an updated survey
of industrial and nonindustrial contaminant sources. These programs shall be
periodically reviewed and addressed in the annual report.
The non-industrial source control program (NISC) information can be found in Chapter 10 of
this annual report.
1.4
ATTACHMENT E, SECTION VII. Effluent Mass Emission Benchmarks
The following mass emission benchmarks[Table E-5]have been established for the effluent
discharge. For each parameter with a mass emission benchmark, the Discharger shall report
the annual mass emission, and the effluent concentrations and flows used to calculate the
annual mass emission, in the annual pretreatment report and annual receiving water
monitoring report(effluent chapter).
The mass emission benchmark information is contained in Chapter 2 of this annual report.
1.5
chapter 2
OCSD's FACILITIES AND COMPLIANCE WITH
DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS
Introduction
Existing OCSD Facilities
Compliance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Requirements
Effluent Characteristics
Facilities Special Projects
Metals
Mass Emission Benchmarks
Chapter 2
OCSD FACILITIES AND COMPLIANCE WITH DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS
2.1 INTRODUCTION
OCSD is responsible for collecting,transporting and treating wastewater,and reusing ordisposing of the
treated wastewater and the separated solids in accordance with all applicable federal,state and local laws
and regulations.The following pages present a summary of the operation of the wastewater treatment and
collection facilities,and the historical data and the regulatory compliance record for FY 2017/18(July 1,
2017 through June 30, 2018). OCSD is also enrolled in the statewide Waste Discharge Requirements
program for sanitary sewers.
OCSD operates and maintains Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No.2,475 miles of sewers,
and 15 outlying pump stations. The treatment plants and pump stations are supervised, operated, and
maintained by highly trained professionals with appropriate certifications from the California State Water
Resources Control Board for treatment plant operators,and the appropriate voluntary certification from the
California Water Environment Association.
The treated wastewater is discharged into the Pacific Ocean in strict and consistent compliance with state
and federal requirements as set forth in OCSD's NPDES permit,or directed to the Orange County Water
District(OCWD)for reclamation.Approximately 130 million gallons per day(MGD)of treated wastewater
was routed to facilities operated by the OCWD during FY 2017/18. The Groundwater Replenishment
System (GWRS) produces purified recycled water used to recharge the Orange County Groundwater
Basin and protect it from degradation due to seawater intrusion. Phase II of GWRS continues to produce
100 MGD of reclaimed water.
During FY 2017118, OCSD beneficially recycled 98% of the belt press dewatered biosolids for use as
agricultural soil amendments and compost products. Total biosolids production for this fiscal year was
approximately 291,792 wet tons, a slight increase from 289,336 wet tons in 2016117. Solids content
averaged 18.70%for Plant No. 1 and 22.28%for Plant No.2.Two management options(land application
and composting) were utilized through four vendor contracts in two states and five counties. A small
number of loads went to the local landfill.OCSD's Biosolids Management Compliance Report for calendar
year 2017 describes the solids management program in more detail (oceewem.com/503). Grit and
screenings are transported under contract for landfill disposal. Debris and grit removed from the sewers
during cleaning is dried at Plant No. 1 and then hauled to a landfill for disposal.
OCSD's primary and secondary treatment, digestion, and dewatering facilities were all operated within
their respective design capacities for the entire fiscal year.
2.1
2.2 EXISTING OCSD FACILITIES
OCSD's operations start with the collection of wastewater from the residential,commercial,and industrial
customers in 20 cities,four special districts,and portions of unincorporated Orange County.The average
daily flow tributary to OCSD per year since 1997 is shown in Table 2.1.
TABLE 2.1 Average Daily Influent and Effluent Flow in Million Gallons Per Day(MGD)
Fiscal Years 1997-2018
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Influent Effluent Fiscal Influent Effluent
Year MGD MGD Year MGD MGD
1997 244 242 2008 221' 2121
1998 255° 255 2009 211" 167
1999 241 239 2010 207 152
2000 241 236 2011 207 152
2001 246 244 2012 201 139
2002 235 231 2013 200 137
2003 239 235 2014 198 137
2004 238 238 2015 187 117
2005 244 247^ 2016 183 92
2006 234 235 2017 188 101
2007 229 232" 2018 185 1 88
a. Decrease due to drought; less infiltration due to drier soils and business recession.
b. There was more effluent than influent due to in-plant construction dewatering that was
discharged downstream of influent metering.
c. El Nino (wet year).
d. Beginning in 2008, more influent than effluent due to Groundwater Replenishment System
2.2.1 Description of Treatment Plants
Based on population served, OCSD is one of the largest wastewater facilities in the United States. The
network of interceptor sewers, treatment units and disposal systems is quite complex. The following
sections provide an overview of the treatment facilities.
2.2.1.1 Reclamation Plant No. 1
Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in the City of Fountain Valley adjacent to the Santa Ana River. The
metering and diversion structure, constructed in 1974, allows the excess wastewater from any of six trunk
sewers tributary to Plant No. 1 to be diverted to Plant No.2 to not overload the capacity of Plant No. 1 or to
provide for maintenance or construction activities. The metering and diversion structure also contains pH
meters,conductivity meters,and flow meters to monitor the incoming wastewater on each trunk sewer.This
operational flexibility also allows Plant No. 1 to provide the highest quality of wastewater for reclamation at
OCWD. Flows from the Santa Ana River Interceptor trunkline,which contains Santa Ana Watershed Project
Authority brines, are diverted to Plant No. 2.
The wastewater flows through bar screens with 5/8-inch-wide openings where large solids(e.g., rags, non-
dispersible materials, plastics, grease chunks) are removed. Wastewater is then pumped to aerated grit
chambers where the velocity of the water is slowed to allow coffee grounds, seeds,sand,gravel, and other
heavy particulate debris to settle out.All the screenings and grit are hauled by a contractor to a landfill for
disposal. Foul air at the treatment plants is captured from the trunk sewers at the metering and diversion
structure,headworks structures and grit chambers fortreatment in the odor control chemical scrubbers.Four
on duty and one standby main sewage pumps lift flow to the grit chambers.
2.2
For improved performance, chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) is done. Ferric chloride and
anionic polymer are added to the primary clarifiers to enhance the settling of the organic solids.Each primary
clarifier is covered to capture foul air for treatment in scrubbers.Plant No. 1 has a primary treatment capacity
of 204 MGD.
During FY 2017/18, 100% of the Plant No. 1 primary effluent received secondary (biological)treatment in
either conventional air activated sludge secondary treatment process or trickling filters.An average of 130
MGD of the secondary treated water was pumped to OCWD's GWRS and the Green Acres Project(GAP)for
advanced tertiary treatment.Advanced tertiary treatment prepares the water for injection into the groundwater
as a barrier against saltwater intrusion, and for percolation to the aquifer for water reclamation and reuse.
OCWD also provides GAP water for industrial uses to OCSD. The balance of the Plant No. 1 secondary
effluent Flows by gravity to Plant No. 2 where it is blended with treated wastewater from Plant No. 2 prior to
pumping and ocean disposal.
Solids collected in the primary and secondary clarifiers are pumped to anaerobic digesters fororganicwaste
stabilization and pathogen destruction at 98 degrees Fahrenheit ff). Following digestion, the sludge is
dewatered using belt filter presses.The belt press-dewatered biosolids are removed by private contractors.
Stabilization results in the production of digester gas,a fuel which is approximately 63% methane and 36%
carbon dioxide. This fuel has a heating value of about 635 Btu/cu.f. Secondary sludge is thickened in
dissolved air floatation (DAF) units prior to digestion. Digester gas is gathered, compressed, cleaned and
distributed to the Central Power Generation System (CGS) at each plant as a renewable fuel for energy
generation.
At Plant No.1,natural gas and digester gas fuel three internal combustion engines that power 2,500 kilowatt
(kW)electric generators.During winter months(Oct.-May)only two of the three engine generators operate at
one time to meet air quality permit limits. During Summer months (June-Sept.)all three engines operate
during peak hours to reduce Southern California Edison (SCE)electricity cost. Supplemental power was
purchased from SCE to provide for the remainder of the Plant No. 1 energy demand. The internal
combustion engines were fueled primarily with digester gas with a small amount(approximately 5-10%)of
purchased natural gas added to aid combustion.
2.2.1.2 Treatment Plant No. 2
Treatment Plant No. 2 is located in the city of Huntington Beach near the mouth of the Santa Ana River.
Five trunk sewers transport wastewater into Headworks D facility,which contains pH meters,conductivity
meters, and flow meters, along with six mechanically cleaned bar screens, seven main sewage pumps
and six grit tanks.All screenings and grit are hauled by a private contractor to a landfill for disposal.The
foul air from the headworks, grit tanks,and primary sedimentation basins is collected for treatment in a
combination of chemical scrubbers and biotowers.
Ferric chloride and anionic polymer are used to enhance the settling of solids during primary treatment.
Settleable and suspended solids,and floatable particulates are removed from the wastewater in primary
sedimentation basins and pumped to anaerobic digesters for stabilization. Plant No. 2 primary effluent
receives 100%secondary treatment in either oxygen activated sludge process or trickling filters.
Sludge from the primary and secondary settling basins is treated in anaerobic digesters. Secondary
sludge is thickened in DAF units prior to digestion.Following digestion,the sludge is dewatered using belt
filter presses. The belt press-dewatered biosolids are removed by private contractors.
The Plant No.2 Central Power Generation System has five internal combustion engines that power five
3,000 kW electric generators and a 1,000-kW steam turbine powered by engine exhaust waste heat.Only
two engine generators were usually operated at any one time based on digester gas availability. During
periods of lower demand excess power was sold to SCE,while power was imported during periods of high
demand. The internal combustion engines were fueled primarily with digester gas with a small amount
(approximately 5-10%)of natural gas.
2.3
Project J-111 was completed in January 2016 where all engines at both plants were retrofitted with dual
catalyst systems that remove air pollutants,nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide in order to comply with
strict South Coast Air Management Quality District air quality permit revised limits. Completion of the J-
111 project provided OCSD with the option to run more engines on natural gas based on fuel cost rather
than emissions limits.
2.4
LA"BRA
BREA
.ULLE—N .oaBA„N!A
EIREENA
PARK
N id µ
IWiN!
SEAL BEKN W
WOIYSY --A-A
OCSD
Plant No rnYa LARA
OCSD .E.. sA„TARAR TA
Plant No.2 NEAPORTBEROR
wo¢ V
Legend „
— Orange County Boundary
OCSD service Area
Boundary 1471 fl alto c�pn
Cl Unicorporated Arm
1`V
Figure 2-1 Map of Orange County Sanitation District's Service Area
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
2.5
2.2.1.3 Joint Works Facilities
Facilities common to both plants are designated as Joint Works Facilities. These include the bypass
sewer to divert wastewater from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2, effluent lines to convey treated wastewater
from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2 for ocean discharge,a fiber optic cable line for interplant communication,
digester gas transmission and storage line,two outfall pumping stations,two ocean outfalls(designated in
the NPDES permit as Discharge Serial Nos.001 and 002),and the emergency gravity overflowflap gate
valves into the Santa Ana River(Discharge Serial No. 003).
Treated secondary effluent from Plants Nos. 1 and 2 is pumped to OCSD's main discharge point, the
120-inch diameter, 5-mile long ocean outfall (the last mile of which is a diffuser with 503 ports that
provides a minimum of 250:1 dilution). During FY 2017118 all influent received secondary treatment.
2.3 COMPLIANCE WITH NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) REQUIREMENTS
This section provides a summary of limitations contained in OCSD's NPDES permit(Order No.R8-2012-
0035/NPDES Permit No. CA0110604, effective on July 20, 2012). Table 2.2 shows NPDES permit
discharge requirements and OCSD's annual average influent and final effluent discharge values for this
reporting period.
2.6
TABLE 2.2 NPDES Permit Discharge Requirements and OCSD's Annual Average Influent and Final Effluent Discharge Values for
Fiscal Year 2017-18
Orange Cou ty Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
OCSD's NPDES Permit Discharge Requirement OCSD's
Combined Final Effluent Compliance
Influent Annual 30-Day 7-Day Annual with NPDES
Constituent Average Average Average Daily Maximum Average' Permit Limits
Flow,MGD 185 -- -- -- 88 NA
BOD-C,mglL 220 25 40 -- 4.4 Yes
BOD-C,Iblday -- 57,129 91,406 -- 3233 Yes
BOD-C percent removal — >Bw -- 98.9 Yes
Suspended Solids,mg/L 373 30 45 -- 5.0 Yes
Suspended Solids,Ib./day — 68,555 102,832 -- 3,645 se Yes
TSS percent remove _ 17V — 99 Yes
Grease and Oil,mglL 43.9 25 40 75 0.4 Yes
Grease and Oil,lb./day -- 57,129 91,406 171,387 277 Yes
Settleable Solids,mVL — 1.0 1.5 3.0 NO Yes
Toxicity,acute — — — Pass/Fail P Yes
Toxicity,chronic — -- -- Pass/Fail P Yes
Turbidity,NTD — 75 100 225 3.4 Yes
pH I's 6.0 to 9.0 6.0 to 9.0 9.0 8.0 Yes
Total Chlorine Residual,mg/L .- 0.36' -- 145 0.07° Yes
Total Chlorine Residual,Iti _ 823' -- 3,313 52' Yes
Benzidine,pg/L NO 0.01249 — — NO Yes
Benzidine,Ib./dey — 0.0285 -- -- — JL Yes
Chlordane,pg/L NO 0.00416 -- -- NO Yes
Chlordane,lb./day — 0.0097 -- -- — Yes
3,3-dichlorobenzidine,pgd- ND lA661 — — NO Yes
3,3-dichlombenzidine,lb./day — 3.3992 -- -- — Yes
Hexachlorobenzene,pg/L ND 0.0380 — — NO Yes
Hexachlorobenzene,Iti — 0.0868 Yes
PAHs,pg/L ND 15928 — -- NO Yes
PAHs,lb./day — 3,6929 -- -- — Yes
PCBs,pg/L NO 00034 -- -- NO Yes
PCBs,IId./day — 0.0078 -- -- — Yes
TCDD equivalents,pg/L NR 0.706 -- -- ND Yes
TCDD equivalents,Mlb/day — 0.001613 -- -- -- 7 Yes
Toxamene,pgd- NR 0.03801 -- -- NO Yes
Toxa hene,lb./day 0.0869 Yes
Additional influent/ef mmt data is shown in Appendix B
Not determined
' Based on the average of the values reported in the monthly Discharge Monitoring Report.For values based on 30-day rolling maximum averages,refer to the
Benchmark section of the Source Control and Ocean Monitoring Annual Reports.
Monthly average minimum
6-month median
ND Non-detectable
NR Not required.NPDES Permit requires monitoring and analysis of TCDD equivalents in effluent only.
NA Not Applicable
2.7
2.4 EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
2.4.1 General
The OCSD National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permit establishes water quality
effluent constituent compliance limits for major wastewater parameters and toxic materials.The following
sections represent a review of the current and historical compliance status for the major wastewater
parameters.OCSD's annual average ocean discharge parameters forthe past five fiscal years are shown
in Table 2.3
2.4.2 Suspended Solids
During FY 2017/18,the suspended solids discharge was in complete compliance with our NPDES permit
effluent limits. The final effluent monthly average suspended solids concentration of 5.0 mg/L for a
monthly average discharge mass emissions rate of 3,645 pounds per day(lb./day)during FY 2017118 is
17%of the allowable 30-day average concentration limit of 30 mg/L,and 5.3%of the mass emissions limit
of 68,555 lb./day.
TABLE 2.3 Suspended Solids and BOD-C Annual Average Daily Influent and
Final Effluent for Fiscal Years 2012-2018
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
SUSPENDED SOLIDS BOD-C
Fiscal Influent Effluent Influent Effluent
Year mg/L I lb./day mg/L lb./day mg/L lb./day mg/L I lb./day
2012-13 316 527,100 7.3 8,300 205 341,900 6.2 7,100
2013-14 337 556,500 6.4 7,300 178 293,900 5.1 5,800
2014-15 342 533,400 5.7 5,600 187 291,600 4.8 4,700
2015-16 362 552,500 6.0 4,600 212 323,600 4.4 3,400
2016-17 396 620,900 5.3 4,500 212 332,400 4.8 4,000
2017-18 396 611,000 5.0 3,700 220 339,400 4.4 3,200
2.4.3 Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD-C)
The current 30-day average discharge permit limit for carbonaceous BOD is 25 mg/L.The discharge was
inconsistent compliance for FY 2017118. The final effluent 30-day average for FY 2017/18 was 4.4 mg/L
with a removal rate of 98%.
2.4.4 Oil and Grease
The NPDES 30-day effluent limit for oil and grease is 25 mg/L and 57,129 lb./day. Oil and grease was
non-detectable in the treated effluent during this fiscal year nor for the past four years.
2.8
2.4.5 Settleable Solids
The 30-day average permit limit for settleable solids is 1.0 milliliter per liter(mUL)with a maximum at any
time of 3.0 mUL. The FY 2017/18 average for settleable solids was non-detectable. A summary of the
annual average settleable solids data for the past five years is shown in Table 2.4.
2.4.6 Turbidity
Turbidity is a measurement of the microscopic suspended solids or finely divided silty particles in water
discharged to the ocean.The compliance limit for turbidity is 75 nephelometric turbidity units(NTU)based
on a 30-day average.The FY 2017/18 average turbidity was 3.1 NTU.A summary of the turbidity data for
the past five years is shown in Table 2.4.
TABLE 2.4 Settleable Solids,Turbidity,and pH,Average Final Effluent for Fiscal Years
2012.2018
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Settleable Solids Turbidity
Year mL/L NTU pH
2012-13 ND 5.1 7.9
2013-14 ND 4.3 7.9
2014-15 ND 3.4 7.9
2015-16 ND 3.1 7.9
2016-17 ND 3.1 8.1
2017-18 ND 3.4 8.0
2.4.7 pH
According to OCSD's NPDES permit,the pH of the ocean discharge shall neither exceed 9.0 nor be less
than 6.0. The effluent was in compliance throughout FY 2017118. The annual mean pH was 8.0,well
within the high and low pH effluent limits.The ocean discharge pH has remained relatively constant over
the past six years, as summarized in Table 2.4.
2.9
2.4.8 Toxicity
OCSD's NPDES permit (Order No. RS-2012-0035) requires that the final effluent be tested once a
month for chronic toxicity,and quarterly for acute toxicity.Results of acute and chronic toxicity tests are
reported as either a"Pass"or"Fail"following the Test of Significant Toxicity hypothesis testing approach
described in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Test of Significant Toxicity
Implementation Document(EPA 833-R-10-003, 2010).
Every calendar year the effluent must be tested using each of the species listed in the NPDES permit to
determine which species are most sensitive to the effluent. The most sensitive test species are then
used as the test organisms for monthly and quarterly testing. In November 2017, acute toxicity tests
were performed to determine the more sensitive of two acute test species:the topsmelt fish,Athennops
affinis and mysid crustacean,Amencamysis bahia.The tests demonstrated that the topsmelt was the
more sensitive species for the acute test.All FY 2017/18 quarterly acute tests utilized the topsmelt.
In November 2017,chronic toxicity tests were performed to determine the most sensitive of three chronic
test species:the giant kelp,Macrocystis pynfera;the purple sea urchin,Strongylocentrotus purpuratus;
and the topsmelt,Athennops affinis. The tests demonstrated that the purple sea urchin was the more
sensitive species for the chronic test.All FY 2017/18 monthly chronic tests utilized the purple sea urchin.
Table 2.5 summarizes the toxicity testing results forfiscal years 2012/13 through 2017118.All FY 2017/18
acute(n=4 tests)and chronic(n=12)toxicity tests passed indicating no final effluent toxicity.
Table 2.5 Final Effluent Yearly Average Toxicity Results for Fiscal Years 2013-2018
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year Toxicity
2012/2013 Acute(A. affinis) Pass
Chronic(S.purpuratus) Pass
2013/2014 Acute(A. affinis) Pass
Chronic(S.purpuratus) Pass
2014/2015 Acute(A. affinis) Pass
Chronic IS.purpuratus) Pass
2015/20160) Acute(A. affinis) Pass
Chronic(S.purpuratus&A. affinis) Pass
2016/2017hI Acute(A. affinis) Pass
Chronic(A.affinis&S.purpuratus) Pass
2017/2018 Acute(A. affinis) Pass
Chronic(S.purpuratus) pass
(t)FY 2015/16 monthly chronic testing was conducted using the purple sea urchin from July 2015
to December 2015 and the topsmelt from January 2016 to June 2016.
(t)FY 2016/17 monthly chronic testing was conducted using topsmelt from July 2016 to October 2016
and the purple sea urchin from November 2016 to June 2017.
2.10
2.5 FACILITIES SPECIAL PROJECTS
2.5.1 Odor & Corrosion Control Chemical Dosing Stations
Chemicals are continuously added to OCSD's trunk sewers in the collections system to minimize
hydrogen sulfide production, reduce odor nuisance,and reduce corrosion of assets.Two new chemical
dosing stations are being added to OCSD's collection system;l)Mendoza Pump Station,which is owned
and operated by the Costa Mesa Sanitary District and 2)Adolfo Lopez Pump Station,which is owned and
operated by the City of Seal Beach. OCSD entered into an agreement with the City of Costa Mesa
Sanitary District in July 2017 to use their Mendoza Pump Station as a ferrous chloride chemical dosing
site to treat the Baker-Main trunk line. This dosing site is currently on hold until the City of Costa Mesa
adopts the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)addendum and signs the access agreement.The
expected start date is December 2018. Likewise,for the Adolfo Lopez Pump Station, OCSD is on hold
until the City of Seal Beach approves the CEQA addendum and signs the access agreement.The City of
Seal Beach is expected to approve and sign the agreement in October 2018. The construction and
mobilization of the new odor control site is estimated to be completed in February 2019.
2.5.2 Plant No. 1 Trickling Filters Bleach Testing
Operations has been receiving odor complaints from odors generated in the trickling filters overthe past
years. Typically,the odor complaints increase during cooler weather(fall and winter). The Engineering
Department has a project scheduled to install dome covers on the trickling filters, but this may not occur
until 2030. For testing purposes, Process Engineering added bleach to the trickling filter feed flow to
prevent anaerobic conditions within the trickling filter. If the testis proven successful,it may eliminate the
need for OCSD to pursue the costly endeavor of placing dome covers on the trickling filters. Process
Engineering staff evaluated the trickling filter performance at different bleach dosages,up to 4 ni which
resulted with minimal impacts to the trickling filter liquid performance parameters. The tests were
conducted for 5 hours at a time. The next step will be to conduct sustained bleach doses for consecutive
days,where staff can collect odor data from the trickling filter stack and media and evaluate the impacts
that bleach has on mitigating odors.
2.5.3 Collections System Reliant Wizard Testing
The Reliant Wizard research project was conducted in the Crystal Cove Pumps Station wet well. The
technology is designed to inject coarse air bubbles into the bottom of the wet well,stirring up the sewage
and preventing a FOG (fats, oil and grease)mat from forming at the surface. FOG mats typically form in
wet wells,where it must be vacuumed out by teams.This work is labor intensive and time consuming.The
Reliant Wizard technology was installed and evaluated from April 2018 to September 2018. During the
evaluation period, the technology proved successful in minimizing the FOG mat, although it did not
completely eliminate the FOG mat. The idea of the Reliant Wizard injecting dissolved oxygen into the
sewage and providing aerobic conditions within the wet well and downstream was evaluated and deemed
unsuccessful. The Reliant Wizard does not increase odors within and around the pump station,and the
blower did not cause any noise issues. Even though the air is injected relatively close to the pump
suction,OCSD's Reliability team conducted vibration analyses that determined the Reliant Wizard had no
impact on pump operations. The Reliant Wizard caused minimal impact to the bubbler level sensor(<
5%).
2.6 METALS
The concentrations of seven metals (cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, silver, and zinc) are
monitored monthly by OCSD. The results of these analyses are used to evaluate efficiencies,trend inputs
from discrete sources,and potential toxic concentrations in the secondary facilities,anaerobic digesters,
and dewatered sludges.
2.11
The average metal concentrations in OCSD's influent and effluent for the last five years are shown in
Table 2.6.
TABLE 2.6 Average Metal Concentrations and Mass in the Influent and Effluent for
Fiscal Years 2014-2018
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
Constituent 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18
Cadmium
mg/L 0.00075 0.00120 0.00142 0.00285 0.00301 <0.00007 <0.00007 <0.00007 <0.00007 0.00007
Ib/day 1 2 1 2 2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Chromium
mg/L 0.0071 0.0076 0.0182 0.0175 0.0168 0.00098 0.00164 0.00074 0.00065 0.00065
lb/day 12 12 13 13 12 1 2 6 0A 0.5
Copper
mg/L 0.1089 0.1076 0.2560 0.250 0.216 0.0085 0.0103 0.0143 0.0098 0.0051
lb/day 180 168 184 188 161 10 10 11 8 4
Lead
mg/L 0.00279 0.00248 0.00540 0.00466 0.00594 <0.00043 0.00005 0.00005 0.00005 0.00007
Ib/tlay 5 4 4 3 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Nickel
mg/L 0.0143 0.0179 0.0319 0.0306 0.0250 0.0114 0.0128 0.0188 0.0132 0.0114
lb/day 23 28 23 23 18 13 12 14 11 8.4
Silver
mg/L 0.00154 0.00139 0.00305 0.00324 0.00268 0.00004 0.00011 0.00003 0.00002 0.000049
lb/day 2 2 2 2 2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Zinc
mg/L 0.1687 0.1640 0.1710 0.4200 0.3870 0.0212 0.0213 0.0383 0.0318 0.0293
lb/day 279 256 297 318 286 24 21 29 27 22
Total Average
IWday 502 471 524 549 486 48 45 55 47 35
2013-141dfluenl mass based on 198 MGD 2013-14 Effluent mass based on 137 MGD
2014-151nfluenl mass based on 187 MGD 2014-15 Effluent mass based on 117 MGD
2015-161nfluent mass based on la3 MGD 2015-16 Effluent mass based on 92 MGD
2016-17 Influent mass based on 188 MGD 2016-17 Effluent mass based on 101 MGD
2017-18 Influent mass based on 185 MGD 2017-18 Effluent mass based on 88 MGD
2.7 MASS EMISSION BENCHMARKS
OCSD's National Pollutant Elimination Discharge System(NPDES)permit(Order R8-2012-0035,NPDES
Permit No.CA0110604,in effect during this July 1,2017 through June 30,2018 reporting period)contains
Mass Emission Benchmarks for 72 constituents as identified in Section VII. Effluent Mass Emission
Benchmarks,Table E-5 on pg. E-31 of Attachment E-Monitoring and Reporting Program. These mass
emission benchmarks are not water quality-based effluent limits;however,OCSD will use this information
as part of its annual evaluation of local limits.
The mass emission benchmarks report is required to compare each constituent's sample result with the
minimum level (MIL)for that constituent contained in the permit. According to the permit requirement,
sample results that are less than the reported MIL but greater than the method detection limit(MDL)are to
be reported as zero prior to calculating the 12-month constituent average. Some ofthe values in the Mass
Emission Benchmarks report differ from those found in the Priority Pollutants report since the former relies
on the MIL as the threshold of detection while the latter uses the MDL as the threshold for reporting.
Most of the heavy metal results fell in the range of 0.0%to 18%of their respective benchmarks with the
exception of selenium which was 59%. Unlike many of the benchmarked organic constituents,OCSD had
extensive historic heavy metals sampling frequencies and detectable levels on which to base its
benchmarks. As a result, the heavy metal data has less statistical variance from the established
benchmarks. With continuing improvements in the pretreatment program,the heavy metals benchmark
results verify the decreasing mass emission trends since constituents are less than their historic values.
2.12
Heavy metals are covered under existing local pretreatment limits. The local limits for those constituents
were evaluated as part of the revised wastewater ordinance and local limits effective on July 1, 2016.
Most of the organic compounds with benchmarks were rarely detected in the effluent. As a result, 67
organic and metal constituents reached only a small fraction (<10%) of their respective benchmarks.
More than half of the 72 constituents were not detected in OCSD's effluent, and are listed as zero (0)
metric tons/year emitted and zero (0) percent of the benchmark. Historically, these constituents were
rarely detected in OCSD's effluent,so the benchmarks could only be based on the method detection limits
(MDL). As OCSD continues to increase the sensitivity of its detection limits,some constituents may be
discernible in the future. As detection limits are lowered, there will likely be fewer zero-tons-emitted
constituents in OCSD's list of benchmarks.
2.13
TABLE 2.7 Mass Emissions for All Benchmark Constituents-Fiscal Year 2017-18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
2017-18 2017-18 2017-18
12-Mo. Avg 12-Mo.Avg Percent of Freq.
Constituent Benchmark Actual Benchmark Min. Mass Max. Mass Sample Freq. Detected Avg. Flow
MT/Year MT/Year Percent Tons/Year Tons/Year Count Count MGD
1,1,1-trichloroelhane 7.13 0 0 0 0 12 0 87.32
1,1,2,2-tetmchloroethane 1.92 0 0 0 0 12 0 87.32
1,1,2-trichloroelhane 1.92 0 0 0 0 12 0 87.32
1,1-dichloroeth lene 1.92 0 0 0 0 12 0 87.32
1,2-dichloroethane 1.92 0 0 0 0 12 0 87.32
1,2-di hen Ih drazine 15.4 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
1,3-dichloro ro ene 1.92 0 0 0 0 12 0 87.32
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 7.68 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
2,4,6-Trichloro henol 7.68 0 10 0 10 12 10 88.19
2,4-Dinitro henol 76.81 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 7.68 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 4.989 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
4,6-Dinitro-2-meth I henol 76.81 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
Acrolein 24.96 0 0 0 0 12 0 87.32
Acrylonitrile 18.06 0 0 0 0 12 0 87.32
Aldrin 0.08 0 0 0 0 3 0 95.01
Antimony 19.2 0.174 0.91 0.134283 0.25925 12 12 90.48
Arsenic 1.92 0.35 18.23 0.210915 0.715786 12 12 90.48
Benzene 3.23 0 10 0 10 12 10 87.32
Benzidine 76.81 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
Beryllium 1.92 0 0 0 0 12 0 90.48
bis 2-Chloroethox methane 15.4 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
bis 2-Chloroe[h ether 15.4 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
bis 2-Chloroiso ro I ether 15.4 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
bis 2-Eth Ihex I hthalate 36.67 0.051 0.14 0 0.33768 12 2 88.19
Cadmium 0.55 0.004 0.73 0 0.027989 12 2 90.48
Carbon tetrachloride 1.92 0 0 0 0 12 0 87.32
2.14
TABLE 2.7 Mass Emissions for All Benchmark Constituents-Fiscal Year 2017-18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
2017-18 2017-18 2017-18
12-Mo.Avg 12-Mo.Avg Percent of Freq.
Constituent Benchmark Actual Benchmark Min. Mass Max. Mass Sample Freq. Detected Avg. Flow
MT/Year MT/Year Percent Tons/Year Tons/Year Count Count MGD
Chlordane total 0.76 0 0 0 0 3 0 95.01
Chlorobenzene 1.91 0 0 0 0 12 0 87.32
Chloroform 2.74 1 36.5 0.55875 1.975599 12 12 87.32
Chromium 2.94 0.081 2.76 0 0.135777 12 9 90.48
Copper 31.52 0.641 2.03 0.324186 1.212318 12 12 90.48
Cyanide 7.75 0.442 5.7 0.258139 0.589534 9 9 89.4
DDT 0.26 0 0 0 0 3 0 95.01
Dichlorobenzenes 15.4 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
Dichloromethane 19.2 0.109 0.57 0 0.992135 12 3 87.32
Dieldrin 0.08 0 0 0 10 3 10 95.01
Diethylphthalate 13.65 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
Dimethylphthalate 7.68 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
Di-n-butylphthalate 15.39 0.018 0.12 0 0.212526 12 1 88.19
Endosulfan 0.23 0 0 0 0 3 0 95.01
Endrin 0.04 0 10 0 0 3 0 95.01
Eth (benzene 1.92 0 0 0 0 12 0 87.32
Fluoranthene 7.68 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
Halomethanes 13.44 0 0 0 0 12 0 87.32
HCH 0.3 0 0 0 0 3 0 95.01
Heptachlor 0.08 0 0 0 10 6 10 95.01
Hexachlorobenzene 7.68 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
Hexachlorobutadiene 15.4 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
Hexachloroc clo entadiene 15.4 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
Hexachloroethane 7.68 10 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
Iso horone 7.68 12
0 0 0 12 0 88.19
Lead 1.29 0.009 0.7 0 0.029587 12 5 90.48
Mercu 0.08 0.001 1.25 0.000243 0.000646 12 12 90.48
Nickel 10.55 11.422 113.48 0.965178 2.063004 12 12 90.48
2.15
TABLE 2.7 Mass Emissions for All Benchmark Constituents-Fiscal Year 2017-18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
2017-18 2017-18 2017-18
12-Mo.Avg 12-Mo.Avg Percent of Freq.
Constituent Benchmark Actual Benchmark Min. Mass Max. Mass Sample Freq. Detected Avg. Flow
MT/Year MT/Year Percent Tons/Year Tons/Year Count Count MGD
Nitrobenzene 7.68 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
n-Nitmsodimeth lamine 4.61 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
n-Nitrosodi hen lamine 7.68 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
PAHs 99.854 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
PCB 13.44 0 0 0 0 3 0 95.01
Selenium 1.92 1.145 59.64 0.459751 2.403934 12 12 90.48
Silver 2.67 0 0 0 0 12 0 90.48
TCDD Equivalents 19.21 0.001 0.01 0 0.001785 4 2 91.98
Tetrachloroeth lene 1.92 0 10 0 10 12 10 87.32
Thallium 3.84 0 0 0 0 12 0 90.48
Toluene 3.98 0 0 0 0 12 0 87.32
Total Chlorinated Phenols 27.6 0 0 0 0 12 0 88.19
Total Non-Chlorinated 218 0.023 0.01 0 0.180105 12 2 88.19
Phenols
Toxa hene 1.92 0 0 0 0 3 0 95.01
richloroethene 1.92 0 0 0 0 12 0 87.32
vinyl chloride 3.84 0 0 0 0 12 0 87.32
Zinc 40.7 3.671 9.02 2.53811 4.818824 12 12 90.48
2.16
chapter 3
PERMITS
Introduction
Permit Classifications
Permit Issuance
Discharge Limits
Establishing Mass Emission Rates (MER)
chapter 3
PERMITS
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) implements permitting and certification control
mechanisms which contain effluent limits for all standards;statements of duration and non-transferability;
self-monitoring, sampling, reporting, record-keeping and notification requirements; and statements of
applicable civil and criminal penalties for discharge violations. The following sections describe the
different classifications of permits, how new permittees are identified, and how discharge limits are
established.
3.2 PERMIT CLASSIFICATIONS
There are seven permit and certification classifications for users that discharge to OCSD's sewerage
system: Class I, Class II,Wastehaulers, Special Purpose, Urban Runoff, FOG(Fats,Oils, and Grease),
and Discharge Certifications.
Class I Permits
Class I dischargers are defined as Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) in accordance with federal
regulations. Examples of these users include plating shops, printed circuit board shops, large food
processors, textile companies with high-volume flows, and industries capable of discharging
non-compatible pollutants. A listing of the Class I permittees is given in Appendix A.
A Class I Permit is issued to any user who meets any one of the following conditions:
1. Is subject to federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards;or
2. Averages 25,000 gallons per day or more of regulated process wastewater; or
3. Has a reasonable potential for adversely affecting OCSD's operation or for violating any
pretreatment standard, local limit,or discharge requirement; or
4. May cause pass through or interference with OCSD's sewerage facilities.
Class II Permits
Class II permittees include commercial enterprises such as restaurants, supermarkets, large
entertainment/service venues,or other high-use non-significant users.
A Class I I Permit is issued to any user who meets all of the following conditions:
1. Hasa charge for use greater than the ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to OCSD; and
2. Discharges waste other than sanitary; and
3. Is not otherwise required to obtain a Class I permit.
3.1
Wastehauler Permits
Wastehauler permits are issued to those users who are engaged in vehicular transport and subsequent
disposal of biodegradable waste into OCSD's system. Wastehauler permittees dispose of septic
tank/cesspool, restaurant grease trap, and portable toilet wastes at OCSD's dedicated disposal facility
located at Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. The discharge of industrial wastewater by any
wastehauler is prohibited unless written authorization from OCSD has been obtained.
Special Purpose Permits
Special Purpose permits are issued to dischargers for the purpose of discharging groundwater,surface
run-off, subsurface drainage, or unpolluted water directly or indirectly to OCSD's facilities when no
alternative method of disposal is reasonably available, or to mitigate an environmental risk or health
hazard. This presently includes groundwater remediation and construction dewatering projects.
Urban Runoff Permits
Urban Runoff is contaminated water that is the result of daily activities such as over-irrigating landscape,
cleaning streets and sidewalks,and washing cars. OCSD enforces wastewater discharge limits by issuing
permits to urban runoff dischargers to ensure that the quality of wastewater does not compromise OCSD's
facilities.
FOG(Fats. Oil. and Grease) Permits
OCSD is administering the local FOG Program for Food Service Establishments(FSEs)that discharge
directly to OCSD owned sewer pipelines. Ordinance OCSD-25 provides for the establishment of the FOG
program and the enforcement of program requirements by OCSD's Resource Protection Division. The
goal of the program is to eliminate Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs) which emanate from FSEs.
Additional information can be found in Chapter 10.
Discharge Certifications
A Discharge Certification may be issued to non-categorical industries that generate wastewater containing
pollutants of concern and have the potential for violating any pretreatment standard or requirement. Zero
Discharge Certifications are issued to those industries that have operations subject to a federal category
regulated by the EPA,but do not discharge industrial wastewater generated from these operations to the
sewer.
3.3 PERMIT ISSUANCE
During FY 2017/18,the pretreatment program managed a total of 544 active permits/certifications. Forty-
Two (42) permits were listed as void or expired during the fiscal year (most due to
ownership/location/class changes and subsequent reissuances), including 16 Class I permits,6 special
purpose discharge permits,and 20 FOG permits. Twenty-Seven(27)new permits were issued,including
12 Class I permits, 1 wastehauler permit, 12 special purpose discharge permits, 1 dry weather urban
runoff permit, and 1 FOG permit.
This level of permit activity represents no significant change compared to the total number of active
permits at the end of the previous fiscal year. Of the 336 Class I permits(significant industrial users),190
were subject to Federal Categorical Pretreatment Standards,and the other 146 industrial permits(non-
categorical)were issued to users that discharge 25,000 gallons per day or more of process water,or have
a reasonable potential for adversely affecting OCSD's plant operations,or have a reasonable potential to
violate any pretreatment standard or requirement.
3.2
3.3.1 Identification of New Permittees
OCSD checks various sources for companies that may be subject to Federal Categorical Standards or
local limits. Wastewater permits are issued to those businesses as required. OCSD obtains new
business information from the following:
• City Business Licensing Departments
• Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's permit database
• OCSD Engineering Department connection permits
• OCSD Finance Department new sewer service referrals
• OC Register newspaper
• Agency referrals during Strike Force meetings
• Currently permitted industries
Up until recently,the majority of new permittees have been identified by OCSD field inspectors during the
course of inspecting current permittees,and when following up on new industries that move into a former
permittee's company location. During FY 2017118, OCSD implemented a new process of receiving the
new and renewed city business licenses from all the cities within OCSD's service area on a quarterly
basis. The records received to date are being evaluated for further investigation, where relevant
industries will be inspected and reviewed for potential permitting.
3.4 DISCHARGE LIMITS
3.4.1 Industrial
In 1976, OCSD established discharge limits for specific pollutants. These limits became increasingly
restrictive over a three-phased implementation period designed to give industry adequate time to comply
with the more stringent standards. The limits were adopted by OCSD's Boards of Directors in 1976 and
were published in OCSD's Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities (Ordinance). New
concentration limits were adopted in the revised Ordinance,which became effective July 1, 1983.
On September 8, 1989,the Boards of Directors adopted a new ordinance entitled Wastewater Discharge
Regulations which contained essentially the same concentration limits as the previous Ordinance.
Revisions included the creation of a specific limit of 0.1 milligrams per liter (mg/L)for polychlorinated
biphenyls(PCB), a limit of 0.1 mg/L for pesticides, and specific limits for wastehaulers. It also included
specific discharge limits for biochemical oxygen demand(BOD);the daily maximum BOD limit was 15,000
pounds per day(Ib/day). These BOD limits were established to prevent pass-through and interference.
The 1989 Ordinance was subsequently revised in February 1992,July 1998, July 2007, July 2008 and
October 2009, but with no change to the local discharge limits. Since the implementation of the Federal
Categorical Standards in April 1984,OCSD applies either the Federal Categorical Standards or OCSD's
local discharge limits,whichever are more stringent. In 2016,OCSD completed a local limits study and
revised its Ordinance, per EPA audit findings,effective July 1,2016. The 2016 Ordinance removed the
numeric BOD concentration limit, removed the cyanide amenable and total toxic organic limits, revised
chromium and silver limits, and added 1,4-dioxane, molybdenum,and selenium limits. These limits are
shown in Table 3.1.
3.3
TABLE 3.1 OCSD's Maximum Allowable Discharge Limits in Milligrams Per Liter(mg/L)
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Constituent Limit(mg/L) Constituent Limit(mg/L)
1,4-Dioxane 1.0 Nickel 10.0
Arsenic 2.0 Oil and Grease of Mineral 100.0
or Petroleum Origin
Cadmium 1.0 Pesticides 0.01
Chromium (Total) 20.0 Polychlorinated Biphenyls 0.01
(PCB)
Copper 3.0 Selenium 3.9
Cyanide(Total) 5.0 Silver 15.0
Lead 2.0 Sulfide(Dissolved) 0.5
Mercury 0.03 Sulfide(Total) 5.0
Molybdenum 2.3 Zinc 10.0
3.4.2 Wastehaulers
After evaluating reference materials from the EPA and laboratory results from wastehauler samples taken
by OCSD,pollutant limits were established forwastehaulers discharging domestic waste that approximate
the maximum expected heavy metal concentrations from domestic wastes found in septic tank/cesspool
wastes. These limits are shown in Table 3.2.
TABLE 3.2 OCSD's Maximum Allowable Discharge Limits in Milligrams Per Liter(mg/L)
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Maximum Allowable Discharge Limits for Wastehaulers
Discharging Domestic Septage to the OCSD Wastehauler Station
Constituent Limit(mg/L)
Cadmium 1.0
Chromium 35.0
Copper 25.0
Lead 10.0
Nickel 10.0
Zinc 50.0
3.4
3.5 ESTABLISHING MASS EMISSION RATES (MER)
OCSD uses a dual approach to regulating wastewater constituents. To encourage water conservation,
waste minimization,and recycling;to limit the total pounds of pollutants that enter the treatment facilities;
and to deter achieving compliance through dilution;most Class 1 permits are issued both concentration-
based limits and mass emission limits. For concentration limits, OCSD applies either the Federal
Categorical Standards or OCSD's local discharge limits (shown in Table 3.1), whichever are more
stringent. Allowable mass emission rates are calculated using the applicable concentration limits in
combination with an industry's three-year average wastewater flow(referred to as a flow base rate). The
flow base rate is determined at the time a permit is initially issued or reissued.
The volume of wastewater used in establishing a permittee's limits is based on water meter information or
additional reports submitted to OCSD. Unless additional water losses can be substantiated,or another
batch, process, or effluent meter measurement device is in place, 95% of the influent city water meter
reading is considered to be discharged to the sewer. The remaining 5% is a standard allowance for
losses in process,evaporation,and landscaping. An allowance for domestic waste is computed based on
a daily usage rate of 25 gallons per employee per 8-hour shift. If there is documentation showing other
water losses,such as product water loss or boiler loss,that are greater than the standard 5%deduction,
then adjustments can be made to accommodate these losses. If water conservation beyond normal
industrial practice takes place, the permitted flow may be adjusted to account for water conservation
and/or water recycling.
The user's annual average industrial wastewater discharge,calculated as described above,is divided by
the number of operational discharge days per year to yield the net discharge in gallons per day. Because
the mass limit(expressed in Ibs/day)provides a pollutant"ceiling,"the user is prevented from introducing
large quantities of water in an attempt to dilute concentrations to meet categorical requirements. If a
discharger wishes to increase production by expanding capacity or increasing the number of hours
worked, pretreatment capabilities must be increased to meet future requirements and ensure long-term
compliance with the applicable limits.
If a permittee exceeds the MER or concentration discharge limits,the permitlee is subject to enforcement
action(s) in accordance with OCSD's Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance and Enforcement
Response Plan,which may include administrative penalties.
3.5
chapter 4
INSPECTION, SAMPLING, COMPLIANCE,
ENFORCEMENT
Introduction
Routine Sampling and Inspection
Non-Routine Sampling and Inspection
Orange County Hazardous Materials Strike Force and Joint Agency Inspections
Industrial Compliance Status with Discharge Limits
Enforcement Activities
Enforcement Summary
chapter 4
INSPECTION, SAMPLING, COMPLIANCE, & ENFORCEMENT
4.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter details the inspection,sampling,and enforcement activities of the Orange County Sanitation
District(OCSD) Industrial Pretreatment Program for FY 2017/18.
The goal of OCSD's Industrial Pretreatment Program is to ensure that dischargers maintain compliance
with Federal Pretreatment Standards and OCSD's Wastewater Discharge Regulations(Ordinance)and
discharge limits through monitoring and verification, in addition to controlling and reducing industrial
pollutants.
An individual industrial discharge status summary of all Class I permittees is provided in the Monitoring and
Compliance Status Report for FY 2017/18 (Appendix A of this report). The following sections describe
OCSD's inspection,monitoring and enforcement efforts and summarize permittees'compliance with EPA
Categorical Standards and OCSD's local limits.
4.2 ROUTINE INSPECTION AND SAMPLING
OCSD's Source Control Inspection group consists of 1 Supervisor, 1 Principal Environmental Specialist,1
Lead Inspector,9 Inspectors, 3 Technicians,and 1 Administrative Assistant. Inspectors provide a visible
presence at industrial facilities and deter non-compliant conduct through on-site sampling and inspections.
The Inspectors perform inspections at each permittee's facility at least once per calendar quarter.
Discharge samples are taken during each inspection for all pertinent regulated constituents based on
permit requirements.
Inspections may include an evaluation of manufacturing plant processes and pretreatment equipment to
observe and discuss changes; verification of waste manifests and other waste disposal documents;
measurement of industrial wastewater flows; field testing and sample collection of wastewater; and a
review of regulations, policies, and procedures for the implementation of the pretreatment program.
Composite samples of a permittee's discharge are collected using automatic samplers and are time-
composited over a 24-hour period. EPA sampling guidelines amused by the Source Control Inspectors for
collecting and preserving samples. In conjunction with each Inspector's on-site observations,the results of
laboratory analyses are used to verify compliance status, help disclose potential operational and
housekeeping problems, evaluate the adequacy of pretreatment systems, and detect new sources of
regulated substances. Grab samples are collected for the determination of compliance with TTOs,
cyanides, Oil and Grease and pH.
During FY 2017/18,OCSD staff conducted 1,192 inspections and collected 3,406 samples. Compared to
last fiscal year, the number of conducted inspections decreased this year by 12% and the number of
samples collected increased by 50%.
4.1
TABLE 4.1 Summary of Inspections, Sampling,and Laboratory Analyses,
Fiscal Years 2013-18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Years
Action/Status 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-2018
Inspections* 1,733 1,654 1,609 1,344 1,192
Samples Collected 3,770 3,933 2,252 2,263 3,406
- Site visits to facilities to address compliance.
4.3 NON-ROUTINE SAMPLING AND INSPECTION
OCSD Source Control Inspection staff perform field duties beyond routine sampling and inspection, as
summarized below:
• Enforcement inspections are performed in response to compliance problems and typically involve
close cooperation with the permittee to identify and correct deficiencies. Source Control Inspectors
resample noncompliant industries within 30 days from the date the violation is issued and submit
compliance inspection reports to document corrective measures taken and to support enforcement
actions.
• Inspectors participate in multi-agency operations such as warrant inspections and environmental
audits. Cross-training with other agencies enables Inspectors to recognize potential problems in other
regulatory areas such as air quality and hazardous waste.
• Chronic violators are subject to increased monitoring and inspection activity, which may include
extended periods of on-site sampling.
• Source Control Inspectors perform routine sampling for cyanide at facilities that have cyanide
treatment systems on site. The sampling occurs at the end of cyanide treatment or at the end of pipe,
just prior to discharge. The purpose of this sampling is to confirm that all cyanide-bearing wastewater
is treated.
• Field support is provided to the Non-Industrial Source Control (NISC) team within the Resource
Protection Division in support of their ongoing programs including quarterly sampling at 21 dry-weather
urban runoff diversions and inspections at 48 dry-cleaners.
• Random sampling throughout the collection system is performed in areas where there is an increased
potential for illegal dumping by industries. These sampling events are generally precursors to
downstream monitoring projects(described in Section 4.3.1)when illicit discharging is suspected.
• On a monthly basis, Source Control Inspection staff collect composite samples on each of OCSD's
twelve trunklines at both OCSD Plants for several days to a week. This monitoring allows OCSD to
identify any potential problems on individual trunk lines,as well as to studythe correlation between our
influent and our effluent and biosolids.
4.3.1 Downstream Sampling
Covert sampling is conducted downstream of an industry to verify continued discharge compliance or
to identify illicit discharges. Sampling is conducted both upstream and downstream in order to isolate
4.2
the industry's discharge. This sampling is performed in manhole structures in local sewer systems
over the course of several days.
Five downstream monitoring events were conducted during the period from July 1, 2017 through June
30, 2018. Industries investigated were Cartel Electronics, Brasslech Inc., Excello Circuits
Manufacturing Corp., Hixson Metal Finishing, and LSW Enterprises, LLC.
4.4 ORANGE COUNTY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STRIKE FORCE
(STRIKE FORCE) AND JOINT AGENCY INSPECTIONS
The Orange County Strike Force is comprised of state, county, city,and other local agencies capable of
identifying, investigating, and prosecuting dischargers of hazardous materials to the environment. The
initial goals of the Strike Force were to define the roles and responsibilities of each participating agency;
establish the scope of the rases to be handled; emphasize cooperative identification, investigation, and
prosecution of violators; and develop protocols among all participating agencies to create a coordinated
enforcement system. An overall protocol was adopted by the Orange County Board of Supervisors in June
1988. The Orange County District Attorney's Office conducts monthly Strike Force meetings to discuss
investigative strategies, ongoing investigations/rases, and identification of potential new cases.
OCSD's staff spent approximately 230 hours assisting the Strike Force in FY 2017/18 by attending
meetings and conducting fieldwork in support of Strike Force activities.
OCSD participates in joint agency inspections of industries suspected of violating hazardous waste and
sewer discharge regulations. This cooperative effort involves other agencies such as the Orange County
Health Care Agency and the Orange Counlys District Attorney's office, responsible for environmental
management and citizen safely. These inspections aid in correcting existing and potential discharge
problems and alerted each of the participating agencies to the concerns of the other cooperating agencies.
4.5 INDUSTRIAL COMPLIANCE STATUS WITH DISCHARGE LIMITS
OCSD monitors and evaluates the compliance status of all regulated industries to determine the
applicability of additional enforcement actions. Analytical monitoring results are reviewed by the source
control supervisor,and limit exceedances are investigated and re-sampled to determine if the cause is a
chronic problem. Additionally, should the inspectors identify any deficiencies in an industry's process
and/or discharge system, the industry is notified of the situation, findings are documented in inspection
reports and discussed with permit engineers,and corrective measures as required are communicated to
the industry to be implemented. A summary of the significant industrial users compliance status for FY
2017118 is shown in Appendix A.
4.5.1 Industries in Significant Noncompliance (SNC)
At the end of each quarter,OCSD is required to evaluate their industrial user's compliance status using a
six-month time frame. Under this system,each industrial user is evaluated for SNC four times during the
year,and the total evaluation period covers 15 months(i.e.,beginning with the last quarter of the previous
pretreatment year through the end of the current year). OCSD is required to annually publish in the local
newspaper all industrial users that have been identified as SNC during the past yearwhen the SNC criteria
were met during any of the previous four quarters. If a facility has been determined to be in SNC based
solely on violations which occurred in the first quarter of the 15-month evaluation (i.e.,the last quarter of
the previous pretreatment year)and the facility has demonstrated consistent compliance in the subsequent
four quarters,then OCSD is not required to publish the Industrial User(IU)in the newspaper if the IU was
published in the previous year for the same violations.
As of June 30,2018,of the active 336 Class I permittees,there were 4(<2%)that had been classified as
SNC;2 of these were categorical industries,and 2 were non-categorical. An industry was determined to
4.3
be in SNC if it incurred a violation that met one or more of the criteria listed below as provided in 40 CFR,
Part 403.
• Chronic violations of discharge limits are defined as those in which 66% or more of all
measurements taken during a six-month period exceed(by any magnitude)the daily maximum or
the average limits for the same pollutant.
• Acute violations of discharge limits are defined as those in which 33% or more of all
measurements taken during a six-month period constitute a Technical Review Criteria violation of
the daily maximum or the average limits.
• Any other violation of a pretreatment effluent limit that has caused,either alone or in combination
with other discharges, interference or pass through.
• Any discharge of a pollutant that has caused imminent endangerment to human health,welfare,or
the environment; or has resulted in OCSD's exercise of its emergency authorities.
• Failure to meet within 90 days after the scheduled date of a compliance schedule milestone
contained in an enforcement order for starting construction, completing construction, or for
attaining final compliance.
• Failureto provide required reports including,but not limited to,periodic self-monitoring reportsand
reports with compliance schedules within 45 days of the due date.
• Failure to accurately report noncompliance with discharge limits or any other requirements
applicable to the user pursuant to OCSD's Ordinance.
• Any other violation orgroup ofviolations thatwill adversely affect the operation or implementation
of OCSD's pretreatment program.
A summary of the permittees in SNC is presented in Table 4.2. The SNC list was published in the October
18,2018 issue of The Orange County Register;a copy of the announcement is presented in Appendix E.
TABLE 4.2 Summary of Companies in Significant Noncompliance(SNC), Fiscal Year 2017-18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Company Name Permit Category city
No.
Industries SNC Due to Discharge Violations
Manufactured Packaging Products 1-521793 1 OCSD Local Limits Brea
Industries SNC Due to Reporting Violations
9W Halo Western opCo, L.P. 1-600378 OCSD Local Limits Orange
Astech Engineered Products, Inc. 1-571295 Metal Finishing Santa Ana
Green Clean Water 8 Waste Services 1-521857 Centralized Waste Treatment Anaheim
4.4
4.6 ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES
During FY 2017/18, OCSD initiated or continued various enforcement actions to bring industries into
compliance. This section describes the types of enforcement actions taken against noncompliant
significant industrial users. In addition, Appendix J shows a listing of pretreatment equipment that has
been installed by OCSD's permittees.
As provided in the Ordinance and Enforcement Response Plan (ERP), OCSD has a broad range of
enforcement mechanisms available, including issuing noncompliance sampling fees, administrative
penalties, Notices of Violation, compliance letters, Probation Orders, and Enforcement Compliance
Schedule Agreements (ECSA); and instituting Emergency Suspension Orders, Permit Suspension, and
Permit Revocation Orders.
OCSD's enforcement program is designed to bring noncompliant industries back into compliance with
federal pretreatment standards and OCSD's local discharge limits. If permittees violate a discharge limit,
enforcement action is initiated. This includes the assessment and issuance of noncompliance sampling
fees, and requiring the permittee to conduct additional sampling along with OCSD conducting additional
sampling. Subsequent noncompliance may result in issuing an order/compliance requirement letter
detailing corrective measures,requiring the installation of additional pretreatment equipment,requiring the
implementation of pollution prevention measures,issuing Emergency Suspension Orders,or suspending
or revoking the discharge permit.
4.6.1 Compliance Inspections
In order to identify and assess any noncompliance problems, corrective actions, and the progress of
permittees operating underthe terms of a Probation Order,Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement
(ECSA),or any other enforcement action,an OCSD pretreatment program engineer and inspector conduct
special compliance inspections.
During FY 2017/18, OCSD conducted sixty-three(63) compliance Inspections.
4.6.2 Compliance Meetings
Compliance meetings are held as a result of the permittee's inability to achieve compliance with discharge
requirements or to comply with OCSD's Ordinance. The meetings are held with company representatives
to discuss the discharge problems and proposed long-term solutions.
During FY 2017/18, OCSD conducted eighteen (18)compliance meetings.
4.6.3 Compliance Requirement Letters
Compliance requirement letters are issued to require a permittee to comply with a specific condition of the
permit and/or Ordinance,or to notify the permittee of an enforcement in accordance with the Enforcement
Response Plan, such as a compliance meeting.
During FY 2017/18, OCSD issued seventeen (17) compliance requirement letters.
4.6.4 Order to Cease/Terminate Non-Compliance/Discharge
Orders are issued where a permittee is continually non-compliant or has committed one or more significant
violations of the permit and/or Ordinance. The Order requires a permittee to comply with a specific
condition of the permit and/or Ordinance and may notify the permittee of escalated enforcement in
accordance with the Enforcement Response Plan, such as a compliance meeting.
4.5
During FY 2017/18, OCSD issued twenty-four(24) orders.
4.6.5 Notices of Violation — Noncompliance Fees, Penalties
A Notice of Violation (NOV) is a written notification from OCSD that references findings from recent
sampling programs and indicates that specific violations of the permittees'discharge limits have occurred.
The NOV is usually accompanied by non-compliance sampling and/or processing fees. The NOV instructs
the permittee to take immediate action to correct the problem.
During FY 2017/18, sixty-five(65) notices of violations were sent to forty(40)significant industrial
users.
When a permittee violates its permit limits or conditions, noncompliance fees are assessed at rates that
have been adopted by OCSD's Board of Directors. For FY 2017118, non-compliance fees, penalties,
settlements, interest, and judgments totaling $137,262.80 were assessed (for details see Appendix D).
Fees also include those from SNC permittees whose names were published in the local newspaper, and
for individual self-monitoring non-compliance fees.
4.6.6 Probation Orders
Upon determination that a permittee is in non-compliance with the terms and conditions specified in its
permit or any provision of OCSD's Ordinance,OCSD may issue a Probation Order. The Probation Order
contains conditions,requirements,and a compliance schedule. The term of a Probation Order does not
exceed ninety(90)days. The permittee is required to comply with all conditions and requirements within
the time specified, including the submittal of information pertaining to waste source characterizations,
pretreatment modifications,and waste minimization alternatives;and the performance of accelerated self-
monitoring.
During FY 2017/18, OCSD issued two(2)probation orders.
4.6.7 Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement
An Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement(ECSA) is an agreement between the permittee and
OCSD specifying that pretreatment equipment is installed or pollution prevention measures are
implemented bythe permittee within a scheduled time period,and thatthe permittee remains in consistent
compliance during the term of the ECSA. The ECSA contains terms and conditions by which the permittee
must operate and specifies dates for construction or acquiring and installing the pretreatment equipment
and/or implementing waste minimization to achieve compliance. During the ECSA, inspection and
sampling of the facilities are conducted monthly by OCSD's inspectors to verify that all terms and
conditions of the ECSA are met. In addition, the permittee is required to perform accelerated and
extended self-monitoring.
During FY 2017/18, OCSD issued one (1) enforcement compliance schedule agreement.
4.6
4.6.8 Regulatory Compliance Schedule Agreement
Subsequent to the issuance of an Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit to an industrial user, federal
Categorical Pretreatment Standards may be adopted or revised by the EPA,or OCSD may enact revised
discharge limits. If the General Manager,or his or her designee,determines that a permittee would not be
in compliance with the newly adopted or revised limits, the permittee may be required to enter into a
Regulatory Compliance Schedule Agreement(RCSA)with OCSD. The terms and conditions of a RCSA
require the permittee to achieve compliance with all new standards by a specific date. RCSAs have a
maximum term of two-hundred-and-seventy(270)days.
The issuance of a RCSA may contain terms and conditions including but not limited to requirements for
installation of pretreatment equipment and facilities,submittal of drawings or reports,waste minimization
practices,or other provisions to ensure compliance with OCSD's Ordinance. While the RCSA is in effect,
any discharge by the permittee in violation of the RCSA will require payment of non-compliance sampling
fees in accordance with Article 6 of OCSD's Ordinance.
During FY 2017/18, OCSD did not issue any regulatory compliance schedule agreements.
4.6.9 Administrative Complaints, Penalties, and Settlement Agreements
Pursuant to the authority of California Government Code Section 54740.5,OCSD may issue administrative
complaints and penalties against the responsible officer or owner of any company that violates any permit
condition or effluent limit. In accordance with an OCSD Board of Directors Resolution, OCSD may also
negotiate a Settlement Agreement in lieu of an administrative compliant,which includes corrective actions
on the part of the industry and reduced administrative penalties.
During FY 2017/18, OCSD issued two (2) administrative penalties in the form of settlement
agreements,totaling$115,965.80, including interest and processing fees.
4.6.10 Permit Suspensions
When OCSD believes that grounds exist for permit suspension,the permittee is notified in writing of the
reasons for permit suspension and the date of the permit suspension hearing. At the hearing,OCSD staff
and the permittee are provided the opportunity to present evidence to a designated hearing officer. After
the conclusion of the hearing,a written determination is made by the hearing officer. Upon issuance of a
suspension order,the permittee must cease all discharges to the sewerfor the duration of the suspension.
During FY 2017/18, OCSD issued one (1) permit suspension.
4.6.11 Permit Revocations
The last recourse in the chain of administrative enforcement provisions is permit revocation. A permittee
with a critical noncompliance record or who has failed to pay fees and charges is notified in writing of the
reasons for permit revocation and the date of the permit revocation hearing. At the hearing,OCSD staff
and the permittee are provided the opportunity to present evidence to a designated hearing officer. After
the conclusion of the hearing,the hearing officer makes a determination if permit revocation is warranted,
and provides a written report to the General Manager for final determination. Should the General Manager
determine that the noncompliance record is substantial,revocation of the industrial waste discharge permit
and loss of sewer discharge privileges may result.
During FY 2017/18, OCSD did not issue any permit revocations.
4.7
4.6.12 Emergency Suspension Order
Pursuant to Section 614 of OCSD's Wastewater Discharge Regulations,an Emergency Suspension Order
maybe ordered to stop an actual or impending discharge which presents or may present an imminent or
substantial endangerment to the health and welfare of persons, or to the environment, or may cause
interference to OCSD's sewerage facilities, or may cause OCSD to violate any state or federal law or
regulation.
During FY 2017/18, OCSD did not issue any emergency suspension orders.
4.6.13 Civil/Criminal Complaints
When a permittee intentionally or negligently violates any provision of the Ordinance,permit conditions,or
discharge limits, OCSD may petition to the Superior Court forthe issuance of a preliminary or permanent
restraining order. In addition,OCSD can petition the Court to impose,assess,and recover civil penalties
for each day that violation occurs or seek criminal penalties for illegal disposal in accordance with OCSD's
Ordinance.
OCSD did not file any civil or criminal complaints during FY 2017/18.
4.7 ENFORCEMENT SUMMARY
This section summarizes various enforcement actions conducted for permittees in FY 2017/18. Potential
enforcement actions include permit revocations,permit suspensions,compliance inspections,compliance
meetings, probation orders, enforcement compliance schedule agreements (ECSA), orders to cease,
among others.
A& G Electropolish (Permit No.1-531422)
A & G Electropolish (A & G) is a job shop metal finishing facility. A & G performs electropolishing of
stainless steel parts for all applications from aerospace to food production. A& G's operations include
fabrication with general machining operations, bead blasting, and other dry processes. Wastewater is
generated from wet process operations, which include deburring, passivation, and electropolishing.
Wastewater is collected in a below grade sump and pumped to the batch treatment tank prior to discharge
to the sewer. Batch treatment at &G consists of pH adjustment utilizing caustic beads,settling,and filter
pressing solids with the filtrate pH adjusted with phosphoric.
June 30—December 31, 2018
On November 30, 2017, OCSD issued an Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges to A&G for
unauthorized hauling of wastewater generated in A&G's mobile passivation service conducted at various
third-party sites, with the purpose of discharging through the facility sewer connection under A & G's
discharge permit. A&G agreed to cease this operation immediately.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On May 2,2018,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection to discuss delinquent permit-required items,
which include submittal offacility drawings and a slug discharge control plan,and hard plumbing of certain
fixtures. During the inspection, OCSD confirmed that the company is no longer conducting mobile
passivation.
OCSD will issue a Compliance Inspection Findings and Requirements Letter and conduct a compliance
inspection during the next reporting period to follow up on the permit-required items.
4.8
A & R Powder Coating. Inc. (Permit No. 1-021088)
A&R Powder Coating,Inc. (A&R)performs job shop powder coating and painting. Cold rolled steel and
aluminum parts are brought in by outside customers. Wastewater is generated by the washing of parts
prior to spray painting or powder coating. A&R employs a batch holding tank to store wastewater from the
wash line. A cartridge filter system is installed on the inlet plumbing line to remove solids during transfer of
the rinse water from the wash line. After in-house testing to ensure compliance with zinc limit,the tank is
drained the next morning into a small 3-stage box clarifier equipped with a discharge line to a floor drain.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On January 5, 2018,A& R had a molybdenum violation, for which a Notice of Violation was issued on
February 6,2018. On March 1,2018, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and resampling. The
source evaluation found that molybdenum is present in phosphate wash solutions and this wastewater is
discharged into the sewer without treatment.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
A & R had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to monitor A & R's
discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Active Plating. Inc. (Permit No. 1-011115)
Active Plating,Inc.(Active Plating)is ajob shop metal finishing facility. Active Plating performs zinc plating
with clear and gold chromate conversion coating on steel, and chemfilm operations on aluminum parts.
Parts are generally used in electronics or computer applications. Wastewater is segregated between
hexavalent chrome bearing operations and other metal-bearing/alkaline wastestreams. Pretreatment
includes chromium reduction, hydroxide precipitation, with settling and flocculation in two parallel
clarification tanks. Active Plating has pH and ORP probes connected to an advanced programmable logic
controller which automates the treatment system.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On April 27,2018,Active Plating had a zinc violation,for which a Notice of Violation was issued on May
10,2018. On May 29,2018,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection during which it was observed that
the pH and ORP probes were not operating property. Also recognized during the inspection,Active Plating
periodically takes one of the clarification tanks off-line for batch treatment or solids removal. During this
period, there are frequent issues with floc carry-over into the sample point due to reduced treatment
capacity. On June 27,2018, OCSD held a compliance meeting with Active Plating where the company
was asked for a long-term solution implementing process controls and treatment when one clarification
tank is offline. The company was also asked to submit detailed pretreatment system drawings and an
updated facility plot plan.
OCSD will continue to closely monitor Active Plating's discharge and compliance status.
Alloy Tech Electr000lishing. Inc. (Permit No. 1-0110361
Alloy Tech Electropolishing, Inc. (Alloy Tech) is a job shop metal finishing facility. Alloy Tech performs
electropolishing and passivation on stainless steel and titanium parts used in various applications.
Wastewater from rinsing operations is directed to the batch treatment system where hydroxide precipitation
removes metals prior to discharging. Alloy Tech discharges approximately one 1,000-gallon batch every
two weeks.
4.9
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On February 28, 2018, Alloy Tech had a nickel violation, for which a Notice of Violation was issued on
March 14, 2018. On April 17, 2018, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection during which it was
determined that the violation was an isolated event most likely due to the improper heat treatment of 17-4
alloy steel. The company agreed to provide a report of all jobs conducted during the wastewater batch in
exceedance,and to sample for nickel from each batch in the next six months to demonstrate that this was
indeed an isolated event.
OCSD will continue to closely monitor Alloy Tech's discharge and their bi-monthly sampling events for
nickel during the next reporting period.
Alsco, Inc. (Permit No. 1-0216561
Alsco Inc.(Alsco)is a large industrial laundry. The company washes tablecloths,linens,towels,and other
fabrics from local restaurants, hotels, and hospitals. After washing and drying,the fabrics are folded,
packaged,and returned to customers. Wastewater generated at Alsco consists of the wash water from
the machines,plus floor wash down and small amounts of boiler blowdown. Atrench and clarifier system
is installed within the building, with a pump system to transfer collected washwater into a lint shaker/
filtration system before discharge into an outside clarifier and then to the sewer.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On December 8,2017,Alsco had an oil&grease(O&G)violation. The company contacted and informed
OCSD that a hydraulic oil leak from their machinery had been detected after the sample was collected.
The equipment was immediately repaired upon discovery and resampling was performed afterward. The
resampling results showed compliance.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On January 4,2018,a Notice of Violation was issued to Alsco for the December 2017 O&G violation. On
January 24,2018,Alsco had another O&G violation,for which a Notice of Violation was issued on March
13,2018. The company checked for any possible sources of O&G and no new sources could be found.
Therefore, Alsco concluded that the violation must have been caused by residual oil from the recent
hydraulic oil leak. Alsco pumped out the clarifier to clean out any remaining residue. Results of samples
collected after the clarifier cleanup showed compliance.
OCSD will continue to monitor Alsco's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Anchen Pharmaceuticals. Inc. (Fairbanks) (Permit No. 1-541180)
Anchen Pharmaceuticals,Inc.(Fairbanks)(Anchen)manufactures pharmaceutical tablets and capsules.
The manufacturing process includes weighing,mixing,granulation,drying,blending,compression,coating,
and encapsulation(for capsules). Wastewater is generated by the cleaning of the equipment used in the
production operations. Anchen does not have a pretreatment system and relies solely on best
management practices in handling solvents used at the facility. Out of the five volatile organic compounds
regulated under the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing federal category, acetone is the main constituent of
concern at Anchen. When acetone is used in a formulation, it is also used to clean out residues in the
mixing/blending equipment.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On December 8,2017,Anchen had a major acetone violation,which Anchen promptly reported to OCSD
upon receipt of their self-monitoring results from their contract laboratory. A Notice of Violation was issued
4.10
on December 28, 2017. On December 28 and 29, 2017, Anchen conducted additional/voluntary self-
monitoring and the results showed compliance.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On February 15, 2018, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection to investigate the source of the
previously reported acetone violations. Anchen indicated that the violation was attributed to failure to
properly contain and dispose of the acetone used to clean Archer's mixing equipment. Archer's
corrective action included retraining its staff on proper protocol when using solvent for cleaning equipment.
Additionally,the resampling results showed compliance.
OCSD will continue to monitor Anchor's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Andres Technical Plating (Permit No. 1-5217981
Andres Technical Plating(Andres Plating)is ajob shop metal finishing facility. Primary operations include
electrolytic nickel, copper plating, hexavalent and trivalent chrome plating, and zinc die casting. Parts
include applications for home bathroom fixtures,automotive industry, among other uses. Wastewater is
generated from static rinse water manually pumped to a batch treatment system. Cyanide is used in the
zinc die cast line,but no waste stream is generated from this process,as it is completely segregated from
other processes,with the drag-out used to replenish the process tank.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On August 8, 2017,Andres Plating had a nickel violation, for which a Notice of Violation was issued on
August 10, 2017. On August 24, 2017, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and resampling,
during which OCSD brought up three concerns to Andres Plating. First and foremost,Andres Plating was
not further treating the chrome wastestream with standard hydroxide precipitation following chrome
reduction. Therefore,nickel and other heavy metals present in the reduced chrome wastestream were not
being removed. Second, the mixer in the batch tank was not long enough to ensure proper mixing and
treatment of the wastestream. Finally, even though Andres Plating screens each treated batch prior to
discharge,Andres Plating had been using expired Hach reagents in the testing process and was not be
producing accurate results. Andres Plating agreed to modify their treatment and testing procedures to
correct all three issues.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
Andres Plating had no further discharge violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to
monitor Andres Plating's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
APCT Orange County (Permit No.1-800503)
APCT Orange County(APCT)acquired Cartel Electronics(Permit No 1-521814)in early 2018. APCT is a
medium-sized full service printed circuit board manufacturing facility. Circuit boards are manufactured
from inner-layers through lamination and micro-drilling,then outer-layer photo-printing,developing,copper
and tin pattern plating,and copper etching/tin stripping followed bysoldermask coating,legend screening,
and final routing and electrical testing before packaging and shipment to customers. ACPT also offers
electroless nickel and gold plating for final surface and connector tab coatings. Wastewater originates
from the chemical etching and plating processes and their associated rinses. During multiple site visits in
2016 and 2017, it was observed that Cartel had significant concerns with various wastestreams in the
shop. These concerns included frequent bypass of treatment,incorrect plumbing configurations,improper
treatment, improper labeling, unknown piping schemes and wastewater characterization, and an overall
general lack of control of the pretreatment operations. Between the months of November 2016 and June
2017,Cartel had been issued three Notices of Violation,an Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges,a
Compliance Letter, a requirement to attend a Compliance Meeting, and participate in a Compliance
4.11
Inspection.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
Between the months of November 2016 and June 2017, Cartel had been issued three Notices of
Violation, an Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges, a Compliance Letter, a requirement to attend a
Compliance Meeting, and participate in a Compliance Inspection. From July to December 2017, Cartel
underwent another two compliance inspections, was issued its Second and Third Orders to Cease,and
was issued another notice of violation for copper. During the month of September 2017,OCSD conducted
a downstream investigation and monitoring of Cartel's discharge and identified 19 days of major copper
and pH violations with pollutant concentrations up to 492 mg/L and 1.30 S.U., respectively. Two more
compliance meetings were held, during which Cartel accepted OCSD's offer to enter into a Settlement
Agreement to resolve the outstanding compliance issues. On December 22, 2017, OCSD issued a
Settlement Agreement to Cartel with penalties totaling$80,965.80(including 6%interest and processing
fees associated with a 12-month payment plan). See Cartel Electronics' (Permit No. 1-521814)
enforcement history on page 4.17 for more details on this reporting period. Due to the change in
ownership that occurred in early 2018, APCT applied for a new permit in accordance with OCSD's
Ordinance. APCT agreed to assume responsibility for Cartel Electronics' outstanding enforcement
requirements.
January 1 —June 30,2018
On April 5,2018,an Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement(ECSA)was finalized between APCT
and OCSD. The ECSA outlined several requirements and milestones set forth for the company to
implement corrective actions and achieve long-term compliance with their permit. While under the ECSA
and just prior to the permit suspension from April 30 to May 14, 2018, a downstream sampling event
indicated that the company discharged copper in violation of the permitted discharge limitfrom April 27to
April 28, 2018.
On May 9,2018, OCSD conducted an inspection to verify compliance with the terms of the ECSA and to
investigate the copper violation. During the Inspection, the company was informed of the recent
downstream result as well as issues with the maintenance logs for their batch treatment. On May 30,
2018, an Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges was issued to APCT for the downstream copper
violations. On June 7,2018, OCSD held a compliance meeting with APCT where APCT explained that
the copper could have been from changes around the facility in response to the ECSA or it could have also
been from an inadvertent dump from an employee. APCT agreed to sample consecutively for five days to
verify compliance with the copper limit. On June 19,2018,OCSD issued a Compliance Meeting Summary
and Requirements Letter to APCT outlining the requirements for multi-day compliance verification sampling
and for submittal of a report for the source of the downstream copper violation.
OCSD will continue to closely monitor APCT's discharge, compliance status, and their ability to meet
milestones associated with the ECSA in the next reporting period.
Arconic Global Fasteners & Rings. Inc. (Permit No. 1-0210811
Arconic Global Fasteners&Rings, Inc. (Arconic)manufactures aluminum,titanium,and steel fasteners.
Wastewater-generating processes include cadmium, copper, silver, nickel and zinc plating, potassium
permanganate treatment,cyanide stripping,glycol lubricant coating,acid stripping,chromate conversion
coating, deburring, quenching, miscellaneous cleaning (mop water), acid/alkaline cleaning, and air
scrubbing. The facility operates a continuous pretreatment system, which consists of pH adjustment,
cyanide destruction, chromium reduction, clarification, and sludge dewatering using a filter press.
Separate, dedicated pretreatment systems are used including electrowinning (for silver plating) and
oil/water separation.
4.12
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On September 19,2017,Arconic had a cyanide(amenable)violation,forwhich a Notice of Violation was
issued on January 22, 2018. On December 5, 2017, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and
routine sampling during which the sampling method/location for cyanide sampling was discussed and the
state of the cyanide treatment system was evaluated. The treatment system was found to be adequately
working during the inspection, and the results of sampling conducted during the inspection showed
compliance with the amenable cyanide limit.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On February 16, 2018, Arconic sent a letter contesting the noncompliant sample result. After a
comprehensive review, OCSD concluded that the sample was valid, and therefore the violation would
stand. APCT had no further violations during this reporting period.
OCSD will continue to monitor Arconic's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Boeing Company (Graham) (Permit No. 1-111018)
Boeing Company (Graham) (Boeing) is a relatively large manufacturing facility that specializes in the
machining, fabrication, and repair of aircraft parts. Wastewater-generating processes include alkaline
cleaning,etching,chromate conversion(Alodine)or chromic anodize surface treatment,scale removal or
pickling,nitric passivation,penetrant inspection, parts cutting,parts milling,and rinses associated with the
surface treatment processes. Boeing uses anion exchange(IX)system for treating rinses,and the treated
rinsewater is recycled back into their operations. Boeing uses a batch treatment system to treat spent
process solutions, IX regeneration wastewater, and the wastestreams from the cutting and milling
machines.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On September 22,2017,Boeing had chromium,copper,and zincviolations,which were issued a Notice of
Violation on October 24,2017. On November 30,2017,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection during
which OCSD determined that the most likely source of the violation was the high solids build-up in the
sample point(final compartment)of Boeing's underground clarifier. There was no record of prior clarifier
pump-out. As a result of the solids accumulation that led to a noncompliance, Boeing has committed to
pumping out the clarifier every 3-6 months until a more appropriate frequency is determined. Boeing is
also considering adding a separate sample box downstream of the final clarifier compartment.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
Boeing had no further violations during this reporting period.
Bristol Industries (Permit No. 1-021226)
Bristol Industries(Bristol)manufactures military specification fasteners,including nuts,bolts,washers,and
rivets, as well as airplane window channels. Wastewater is generated from the metal finishing and
aluminum forming operations, which include acid/alkaline cleaning, plating (silver, copper, nickel,
chromium,and cadmium), anodizing, deburring,and associated rinses. Bristol operates both batch and
continuous pretreatment systems. The continuous pretreatment system consists of an equalization tank,
chrome reduction, cyanide destruction, hydroxide precipitation, pH adjustment,an effluent pH controller
and recorder,final polishing filter,filter press, Lamella clarifier,and an electrowinning system. The batch
treatment system is used to treat spent process solutions.
In 2017, Bristol completed construction of a new building within the existing facility to house new process
and rinse tanks that would eventually replace all their aging tanks. Bristol also completed installation of a
4.13
brand new state-of-the-art pretreatment system which will replace their existing one. The new system
consists of a continuous ion exchange(IX)system for heavy metals removal,and batch treatment for IX
regeneration waste, chrome reduction, and cyanide destruction. The new IX system allows Bristol to
recycle most of their rinses and thus save water.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
In June 2017, Bristol had a cyanide (amenable)violation for which a Notice of Violation was issued on
October 3,2017. On July 27,2017,Bristol had another cyanide(amenable)violation,for which a Notice
of Violation was issued on October 3,2017. On August 22,2017, Bristol had a cadmium violation,for
which a Notice of Violation was issued on September 28,2017. On August 30,2017,Bristol submitted a
Root Cause Analysis and Corrective Action Report for the two aforementioned cyanide violations. The
report attributed the violations to inadequate retention time due to high production and high Flow rate during
those two days,aggravated by low oxidation reduction potential(ORP)in Stage 1 and high ORP in Stage
2,thus causing incomplete destruction of cyanide. Bristol's corrective actions consisted of adjusting the
ORP and pH in both Stage 1 and Stage 2 during heavy production days to ensure complete treatment of
cyanide. Bristol conducted multi-day sampling to confirm the efficiency of their modifications/corrective
actions and the test results all showed compliance.
On September 14,2017,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and resampling,during which Bristol
indicated that the pretreatment system operators had been trained on the proper pH and ORP settings for
treatment of the cyanide-bearing wastestreams. However,the results for the sample collected during the
compliance inspection demonstrated a nickel violation, for which a Notice of Violation was issued on
October 3,2017. On September 28,2017,Bristol submitted another Root Cause Analysis and Corrective
Action Report to address the cadmium violation. During the investigation,facility representative discovered
that the blade in the batch treatment tank was not connected to the mixer shaft,and therefore no mixing
was occurring in the batch tank. It was found that the mixer blade became detached due to loosened
fasteners. Bristol immediately fixed the problem and conducted resampling for cadmium. The resampling
results showed compliance.
On October 10,2017, OCSD conducted resampling for nickel and the results showed compliance. On
October26,2017,Bristol submitted a third Root Cause Analysis and Corrective Actions Reportlo address
the nickel violation. The report cited inadequate pH and ORP selpoints as the cause of the violation.
Corrective actions consisted of increasing the pH, reducing the ORP,and conducting in-house testing of
each treated batch for compliance before discharging the effluent to the sewer.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On April 10,2018, Bristol had another cyanide(amenable)violation,for which a Notice of Violation was
issued on May 16,2018. On June 4,2018,OCSD conducted another compliance inspection,during which
Bristol submitted another Root Cause Analysis and Corrective Action Report to address the violation. The
report identified the source of cyanide amenable violation to several operational issues and issues with
ORP probes. Corrective actions consisted of weekly calibration of the ORP probes, maintenance of
calibration record logs, updating of treatment unit operating instructions to include calibration frequency,
additional operator training, and additional team leader verification for probe check and record-keeping.
OCSD will continue to monitor Bristol's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Cadillac Plating. Inc. (Permit No. 1-021062)
Cadillac Plating, Inc. (Cadillac) is a job shop metal finishing facility. Wastewater-generating processes
include alkaline and acid chloride zinc plating, bright tin plating, bright nickel plating, sulfuric anodizing,
alkaline cleaning, acid activation, chromate conversion coating, chemfilm, and associated rinses. The
facility engages in rack plating only. The facility operates a continuous hydroxide pretreatment system with
pH adjustment, chrome reduction, flocculent addition, clarification, and sludge dewatering with a filter
4.14
press. Spent solutions are treated in a batch system,with the batch treatment effluent routed through the
continuous pretreatment system for further treatment.
In January 2017,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection,during which numerous pretreatment system
deficiencies and violations were found including: a measured pH value of 12.85 S.U. in the facility
discharge (limit is 12.0 S.U.); instrumentation out for repair or not operating; and lack of a qualified
industrial wastewater treatment operator during wastewater discharge. Thus, OCSD issued an Order to
Cease Noncompliant Discharges to Cadillac followed by a compliance meeting and issuance of a
Probation Order in February 2017. In March 2017, OCSD conducted a joint probation search with
representatives from the Orange County District Attorneys office, Occupational Safety & Health
Administration(OSHA),and Orange County Health Care Agency(OCHCA). OSHA and OCHCA identified
the following violations: high carbon monoxide levels outside the permissible limits;lack of proper personal
protective equipment; illegal disposal of hazardous waste into general waste bins; unsafe electrical
conditions; and general disregard for safety. As a result of numerous safety violations, OSHA issued an
Order Prohibiting Use(OPU).
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On August 24,2017, OCSD issued another Probation Order with the same requirements as the original
probation order but with a different completion date since Cadillac was unable to meet the progress
requirements of the compliance schedule due to OSHA's Order Prohibiting Use. On August 25,
September 20,and October 31,2017, OCSD conducted compliance inspections to determine whether
progress was being made towards the completion of the Probation Order requirements by the new
deadline of October 31,2017,and issued a compliance requirement letter on October 25,2017. During
the course of both probation orders, Cadillac failed to provide sufficient updates on progress, and the
submitted deliverables were below acceptable standards. Cadillac was also issued two Notices of
Violation on September 20, 2017 for copper discharge violations and failed to meet the deadline for
completion of the reissued probation order requirements. On November 13, 2017, OCSD held a
compliance meeting with Cadillac to review the pretreatment system deficiencies. On November 17,
2017, OCSD issued an additional compliance requirements letter for completion of the outstanding
probation order requirements. On December 15, 2017, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection to
verify completion of the remaining items. Requirements related to pretreatment equipment deficiencies
were completed; however, the documentation provided by Cadillac was not acceptable. OCSD sent
comments to Cadillac to correct the Operations and Maintenance Manual by January 31,2018.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
As a result of legal action between the Orange County District Attorney and Cadillac, OCSD conducted
another inspection on March 26,2018 to confirm the completion of the requirements from the Probation
Order dated August 24, 2017. The continuous pretreatment system was operating in a safe and
controlled manner. There was no indication of overflow, short-circuiting, or slug loading. The batch
treatment system was operational and appeared to be maintained. Log sheets for the batch treatment
system were being kept on site and were up to date.
Cadillac had no further violations during this reporting period.
Cal-Aurum Industries. Inc. (Permit No. 1-111089)
Cal-Aurum Industries, Inc. (Cal-Aurum) is a large metal finishing job shop. Cal-Aurum specializes in
precious metals plating, providing services for aerospace, communications, electronics, and military
applications. The wet processing includes rack, barrel, and continuous reel-to-reel processes.
Wastewater is generated from the cleaning, coating, common and precious metals electroplating,
electroless plating, etching, finish stripping, and the rinsing of parts. Cal-Aurum utilizes a batch
pretreatment system for treating spent solutions,and a continuous pretreatment system for all other waste
streams. The metal-bearing rinses receive pH adjustment and hydroxide precipitation prior to discharge to
4.15
the sewer. Cal-Aurum also uses a filter press for dewatering the sludge from the batch treatment
operation. The filtrate is pumped to a final polishing filter then to a holding tank where it is tested for
compliance prior to discharge.
During a routine permit renewal inspection in March 2017,OCSD noted changes in Cal-Aurum's process
area,which triggered reclassification of Cal-Aurum's 10%New Source and 90%Existing Source status to
100% New Source. OCSD also noted that the sample point for cyanide-bearing waste stream was not
separate from non-cyanide bearing wastewater. In May 2017, OCSD held a compliance meeting
with Cal-Aurum to discuss the cyanide sampling point issue and the reclassification to a New Source
facility with more stringent limits. A subsequent meeting was held at the facility in June 2017,during which
a dye test was conducted to determine the level of difficulty to separate drain lines and provide a separate
sampling point for cyanide-bearing waste streams. It was concluded that the existing drain lines are
comingled and there is no straightforward way of separating the cyanide-bearing wastewater.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On July 26,2017,OCSD conducted another inspection followed bya meeting,during which OCSD notified
Cal-Aurum of the impending New Source reclassification and the required separation of the cyanide-
bearing waste stream from the non-cyanide bearing waste streams. On September 20,2017,OCSD held
a compliance meeting with Cal-Aurum to discuss the inspection findings and provide a compliance
schedule to remedy the issues mentioned above. On October 19,2017,OCSD issued a Probation Order
requiring separation of the cyanide-bearing waste streams from the non-cyanide bearing waste streams,
and submittal of a waste management proposal by December 31, 2017.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
As a result of the probation order issued in October 2017, OCSD conducted follow-up compliance
inspections on January 10,February 1,February 20,March 8,March 23,March 29,April 2,and April
16, 2018. The purpose of the inspections was to verify the status of the probation order requirements.
Due to Cal-Aurum's failure to complete the requirements by the December 31,2017 deadline,compliance
requirement letters were issued on January 15 and February 2,2018. In addition,a compliance meeting
was held on February 14, 2018 and as a result, new compliance schedule dates were issued in a letter
dated February 15,2018. Cal-Aurum finally completed the separation of cyanide bearing waste streams
on April 2,2018 and completed installation of the cyanide treatment system on April 16, 2018.
OCSD will continue to monitor Cal-Aurum's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Cartel Electronics (Permit No. 1-521814)
Cartel Electronics(Cartel)is a medium-sized full service printed circuit board manufacturing facility. Circuit
boards are manufactured from inner-layers through lamination and microdrilling,then outer-layer photo-
printing, developing, copper and tin pattern plating, and copper etching / tin stripping followed by
soldermask coating, legend screening, and final routing and electrical testing before packaging and
shipment to customers. Cartel also offers electroless nickel and gold plating for final surface and
connector tab coatings. Wastewater originates from the chemical etching and plating processes and
associated rinses.
Cartel utilizes a batch hydroxide precipitation system and a continuous pretreatment system consisting of
ion exchange treatment for low metal concentration wastestreams. Regeneration of the ion exchange
columns is performed onsite,and the regenerant waste is batch treated. Aflter press is utilized to dewater
the solids from the batch treatment.
Historically,Cartel has had frequent copper violations. During multiple site visits in 2016 and 2017,it was
observed that Cartel had significant concerns with various wastestreams in the shop. These concerns
included frequent bypass of treatment, incorrect plumbing configurations, improper treatment, improper
4.16
labeling,unknown piping schemes and wastewater characterization,and an overall general lack of control
of the pretreatment operations. Between the months of November 2016 and June 2017,Cartel had been
issued three Notices of Violation, an Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges, a Compliance Letter, a
requirement to attend a Compliance Meeting, and participate in a Compliance Inspection.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On August 30, 2017, OCSD conducted a follow-up compliance inspection and sampling event, during
which OCSD observed that Cartel had failed to correct the noncompliance issues identified in the Cease
Order and the compliance requirements letter. OCSD also observed that the collection sump continued to
discharge untreated metal-bearing wastewater to the sewer via a bypass. Samples were collected at other
waste streams that Cartel had indicated were non-metal bearing,and therefore bypassing treatment,and
were found to contain elevated copper exceeding the copper limit. During the visit, OCSD issued a
Corrective Action Notice to Cartel for failure to have proper treatment equipment such as pH and ORP
meters. On September 1,2017, OCSD conducted another compliance inspection and observed further
non-discharge violations including dilution and intentional bypass with a flex hose. Thus, on September
13,2017, OCSD issued a Second Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges to Cartel.
On September 14, 2017, Cartel had another major copper violation, for which a Notice of Violation was
issued on October 25,2017.
During the month of September 2017, OCSD conducted a downstream investigation and monitoring of
Cartel's discharge and identified 19 days of major copper and pH violations with pollutant concentrations
up to 492 mg/L and 1.30 S.U., respectively. On one occurrence, during a sample event at the facility,
OCSD equipment was tampered with by a Cartel employee as captured on a security camera. Thus,on
September 27,2017,OCSD issued a Third Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges for the downstream
violations and tampering of sampling equipment.
On October 2, 2017, OCSD held a compliance meeting with Cartel and expressed the intent to file an
administrative complaint against the permittee. OCSD offered Cartel the opportunity to come to a
settlement. Cartel acknowledged the severity of the situation, assumed responsibility for the lack of
oversight required to maintain discharge compliance,and agreed to settle the matterwith OCSD. OCSD
held a compliance meeting with Cartel on October 19, 2017 to discuss the Settlement Agreement. On
December 22,2017, OCSD issued a Settlement Agreement to Cartel with penalties totaling$80,965.80
(including 6%interest and processing fees associated with a 12-month payment plan). Cartel also agreed
to comply with all permit conditions and cease noncompliant discharges,as well as adhere to requirements
that will be specified in an Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement(ECSA)to be issued in 2018
once the Settlement Agreement was executed.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
Cartel underwent an ownership change to APCT Orange County(APCT)in early 2018 and a new permit
(Permit No. 1-600503) was issued to APCT on March 1, 2018. Continued enforcement for Cartel this
period is summarized under APCT.
Circuit Technology. Inc. (Permit No. 1-521821)
Circuit Technology,Inc.(Circuit Technology)is a small print and etchjob shop servicing the printed circuit
board industry. Many of the production steps are conducted in-house, beginning with customer supplied
artwork. Processes include photo imaging,silk screening,solder mask screening,dry-film developing and
laminating, scrubbing, resist stripping, and etching.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On February 14,2018,Circuit Technology had copper concentration and mass limit violations,forwhich a
4.17
Notice of Violation was issued on March 12, 2018. On May 8, 2018, OCSD conducted a compliance
inspection to investigate the violations. Circuit Technology explained that the violation occurred during a
clean-up operation by employees that normally don't work around the etcher, in preparation for an
upcoming visit by the Fire Department. One of these employees reportedly used a rinse tank adjacent to
the etcher to rinse out rags that were used to wipe up highly concentrated solution. Asa corrective action,
Circuit Technology held a meeting with employees to discuss measures to be taken to maintain
compliance with OCSD. OCSD staff recommended that this corrective measure be captured in an
operations and maintenance manual.
OCSD staff will continue to monitor Circuit Technology's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly
basis.
D.F. Stauffer Biscuit Co.. Inc. (Permit No. 1-600414)
D.F.Stauffer Biscuit Co.,Inc.(Stauffer)is a food processing facilitywhere baked goods,including crackers
and cookies, are produced. Wastewater is generated from the cleaning and sanitizing of equipment and
processing rooms. All wastewater is collected through floor drains and directed to the three-stage clarifier
with sample box.
As with several food manufacturing facilities,Stauffer has issues with maintaining compliant pH(6.0-12.0
S.U.) at the sample point. This is due to the acidic cleaning agents used onsite, and a result of
fermentation of the high strength (BOD/TSS)wastewater discharge.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On March 14&15,2018, Stauffer had a pH violation,for which a Notice of Violation was issued on May
15,2018. On June 6,2018,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection during which another pH violation
was detected, indicating a chronic concern for pH exceedances. On June 21,2018, Stauffer installed a
caustic drip system in the washroom for interim compliance until a long-term solution is proposed and
installed in the next reporting period.
OCSD staff will continue to work with D.F.Stauffer providing regulatory guidance for implementation of the
new pretreatment system.
Electron Plating III, Inc. (Permit No. 1-021336)
Electron Plating III, Inc.(Electron Plating)is ajob shop metal finishing facility that takes in metal parts from
various customers and surface finishes them with chromate-based chemfilming,dye coloring,zinc plafing,
and aluminum anodizing. The parts come primarily from the automotive, home improvement(bathroom
fixtures),and construction industries. Alkaline and acidic pre-cleaners are used,along with drag-out tanks
after most process solutions, followed with running rinses. A standard continuous hydroxide-based
pretreatment system is used for heavy metals removal,along with a hexavalent chrome reduction module
with automated pH and ORP controls. A large lamella-type clarifier is used for solids settling,and a filter
press is used for solids dewatering.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On October 31,2017, Electron Plating had copper and pH violations,forwhich a Notice of Violation was
issued on December 11,2017.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On January 3, 2018, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and resampling. Electron Plating
attributed the violations to mishandling of the spent anodize process solution during replacement. As a
corrective measure, Electron Plating retrained its workers on the proper replacement of spent solutions
4.18
and had its environmental consultant evaluate and perform maintenance on the treatment system. Results
of resampling showed a cadmium violation, for which a Notice of Violation was issued on January 18,
2018. On January 29, 2018, OCSD conducted a follow-up compliance inspection during which it was
determined that the only source of cadmium onsite was the nitric acid stripping. OCSD suggested use of a
static rinse to reduce carryover from that process,which Electron Plating implemented.
OCSD will continue to monitor Electron Plating's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Electronic Precision Specialties. Inc. (Permit No. 1-021337)
Electronic Precision Specialties, Inc. (EPSI) is a medium size job shop plating shop, which provides
specialty coatings plus precious metals and standard electrolytic(cadmium,copper,nickel)metal plating to
customers in the electronics and aviation plus government/military industries. Wastewater is generated
from rinsing of parts after preclean and surface coating and plating operations,plus some amount of spent
process chemistry (precleaners) that is treated and discharged on site. Remaining spent process
chemistry is wastehauled offsite for reclaim(precious metals)or treatment at licensed treatment facilities.
Wastewater treatment at EPSI consists of standard pH neutralization for non-metal bearing wastestreams,
followed by clarification before discharge to the sewer,while metal bearing wastestreams(primarily rinse
water)is recycled through three separate ion exchange systems for nickel,copper,and cadmium. EPSI
also operates a cyanide oxidation pretreatment system for non-reclaimed rinsewaler from its precious
metals/silver plating line, followed by a silver recovery module that is recycled back to the rinse tanks.
Regeneration of the general metals IX columns is performed onsite and the regeneration wastewater is
collected and evaporated in a 500-gallon stainless steel tank,which is periodically cleaned and the sludge
wastehauled offsite.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On October 11, 2017, EPSI had a nickel violation, for which a Notice of Violation was issued on
November2,2017. On November 28,2017,OCSD performed a compliance inspection and resampling,
during which it was determined that a plating operator had mishandled spent nickel plating solution by
dumping it into a rinse tank instead of a holding tank for spent solutions. The resampling results showed
compliance. Subsequent sampling also showed compliance.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
EPSI had no further violations during this reporting period.
Excello Circuits Manufacturing Corp (Permit No. 1-521855)
Excello Circuits Manufacturing Corp. (Excello) is a full service printed circuit board manufacturer.
Wastewater is generated from rinsing after inner-layer preclean and photo resist develop, etch, and
stripping processes, then outer-layer electroless copper plating, photo print developing, and copper/tin
pattern plate plus etch and strip processes. The wastewatertreatment system at Excello consists of an ion
exchange(IX)recycling system for metal-bearing rinses,and a batch treatment system for spent process
solutions, mainly acid precleaners. Spent copper etchant is wastehauled offsite along with other spent
process solutions. Sludge from the batch treatment process is dewatered with a filter press and
wastehauled offsite. Non-metal bearing processes wastestreams and rinsewater from photo resist and
soldermask developing, along with resist strip rinsing, are discharged to the sample point without
treatment.
In June 2017, Excello had a copper violation.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On August 28,2017, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection during which OCSD noted that although
4.19
the batch treatment system was operational for some wastestreams, the continuous IX pretreatment
system had been disconnected. The company also had an inadequate collection sump where metal-
bearing wastewater would overflow to the non-metal bearing wastewater chamber and flow directly to the
sewer without treatment. Furthermore,several metal-bearing wastestreams were connected to the non-
metal bearing plumbing and bypassing treatment. On September 6, 2017, a Notice of Violation was
issued for the June 2017 violation, and a compliance inspection was conducted the same day. On
September 12 and September 14,2017,OCSD issued Excello a Corrective Action Notice and an Order to
Cease Noncompliant Discharges, respectively.
On October 3,2017, OCSD held a compliance meeting with Excello,where Excello was informed of the
requirement to segregate non-metal and metal-bearing wastestreams and to operate the continuous
pretreatment system at all times the facility is discharging. OCSD also required Excello to submit updated
plans and drawings with an accompanying waste destination and tank schedule, and to perform
wastewater characterization.
On October 12,2017,Excello had another copper violation,for which a Notice of Violation was issued on
October 24, 2017. Excello indicated that the copper exceedance was due to troubleshooting during the
re-installation of their IX pretreatment system. On October 31,2017, OCSD conducted resampling and
the results showed compliance.
On December 13, 2017, OCSD issued a Compliance Meeting Summary and Requirements Letter
reiterating the items discussed during the October 2017 compliance meeting. Specifically, the Letter
addressed the need for an improved treatment system and operational controls,updated facility drawings,
elimination of bypass wastestreams, and requirements for wastewater characterization.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
From April 27 to April 28, 2018, OCSD detected noncompliant levels of copper during a downstream
monitoring conducted at Excello. On May 31, 2018, OCSD issued an Order to Cease Noncompliant
Discharges to Excello in regard to copper exceedances from the downstream sampling. On June 20,
2018,OCSD held a compliance meeting with Excello to address the downstream results. Excello stated
that the exceedances are due to errors in the batch treatment process,and that new treatment chemistry
and a new filter press were going to be implemented to correct the non-compliance.
OCSD will issue a Probation Order to Excello in the next reporting period, including requirements and
compliance dates to correct the deficiencies at the facility.
FMH Aerospace Corp DBA FMH Corporation (Permit No. 1571331)
FMH Aerospace Corp (FMH) is a manufacturer of complex fabricated components including expansion
and flexible joints, formed and welded metal bellows, high pressure(braided) gas or fluid transfer lines,
and pressurized ducts for aerospace, commercial, industrial, military/defense, and transportation
applications. Many of the fabricated parts require extensive production tooling,therefore,a large portion of
the facility is dedicated to general machine shop operations. Wastewater is generated primarily from the
rinses following the surface cleaning and finishing operations performed on the metal parts during the
various manufacturing stages, contact cooling for seam (resistance) welding, and secondarily by
hydrostatic testing and fluorescent penetrant inspection conducted on the assemblies. The pretreatment
system at FMH consists solely of pH adjustment.
In October 2016,and April and May 2017, FMH had silver violations.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On July 19, 2017, FMH had another silver violation for which an Notice of Violation was issued. On
August 22,2017, FMH had chromium,copper,lead,nickel,silver,and zinc violations,for which a Notice of
4.20
Violation was issued on December 7, 2017. OCSD also issued an Order to Cease Noncompliant
Discharges to FMH on December 7,2017. On December 18, 2017,OCSD held a compliance meeting
with FMH during which FMH informed OCSD that to prevent further silver violations, the company had
purchased and already installed a new silver recoverylelectrowinning unit. FMH also indicated that the
heavy metal violations that occurred in August most likely resulted from cross-contamination from the dust
generated during floor resurfacing in their machine shop. Fine metal particulates had accumulated on the
floor over the years of machining operations, and during floor resurfacing, dust containing metal
particulates found its way to the sample point.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On March 14,2018, FMH had another silver violation,for which a Notice of Violation was issued on April
18,2018. On May 2,2018,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection during which FMH indicated that
the company's contract laboratory was analyzing the split sample and plan to appeal if the sample results
were compliant. On May 22,2018, FMH informed OCSD that the split sample results were noncompliant.
On May 31,2018,OCSD issued a Second Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges and required FMH to
attend a compliance meeting on June 19,2018. In the meeting, FMH identified the source of the silver
discharge violation to a fault in the internet connectivity that halted the silver recovery system. FMH also
informed OCSD that they have doubled the capacity of their silver recovery system and that all the filters
will be replaced every quarter. On July 11, 2018, OCSD issued a Compliance Meeting Summary and
Requirements Letter directing FMH to collect silver recovery waste in a batch discharge tank and maintain
a batch discharge log. FMH was required to test each batch for compliance and to discharge only if the
testing demonstrated compliance with the silver limits. Additionally, FMH was required to maintain waste
manifests and make them available to OCSD upon request.
OCSD will continue to monitor FMH's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis to determine
the need for escalated enforcement actions.
Hanson-Loran (Permit No. 1-031107)
Hanson-Loran manufactures water-based floor finishers and specialty cleaners for distribution and sales by
various independent contractors. The processes include dry blending(from which there is no wastewater
discharge)and wet blending. The dry blending process is located inside the building,where dry powders
are blended to produce Hanson-Loran's industrial cleaners. Wet blending is accomplished in four mixing
tanks at the rear of the building. Each tank has a process meter to measure water added to produce the
product. Products include floor cleaners,waxes,strippers,cleaners,degreasers,sanitizers,disinfectants,
and soaps. Hanson-Loran's treatment system consists of an underground three-stage clarifier with manual
pH adjustment using pH paper and addition of granulated citric acid.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On October 10 and October 11,2017, Hanson-Loran had pH violations,for which a Notice of Violation
was issued on November 2,2017. On November 14,2017,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection
andresampling. The resampling results showed compliance. However,noting that the treatment system
lacked adequate control,OCSD advised Hanson-Loran to take corrective measures to prevent further pH
noncompliance. Hanson-Loran stated they would be installing an automated pH control system.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
Hanson-Loran completed installation of the automated pH control system during this reporting period.
However, during OCSD's routine sampling on June 27, 2018, a variation in pH readings was noted at
different depths in the sample point, indicating a lack of proper mixing. Hanson-Loran was informed that
the representative volume of wastewater being sampled should be sufficiently mixed such that the pH
readings are consistent across the entire depth of the sample point.
OCSD will follow up with Hanson-Loran to verify that the pH reading consistency issue is addressed during
4.21
the next reporting period.
Hixson Metal Finishing (Permit No. 1-0611151
Hixson Metal Finishing (Hixson) is a large metal finishing job shop. Various metallic parts from the
aviation,automotive,and electronics industries are received forsurface finishing with aluminum chemfilm
and dyeing,cadmium,copper,and nickel electroplating,stainless-steel passivation,as well as a multitude
of chemical precleaning and surface activation processes. Wastewater is generated from the rinses used
in the various surface finish processes and fume hood wash water. The wastewater treatment at Hixson
consists of cyanide destruction and chrome reduction followed by heavy metals precipitation using caustic
soda for pH adjustment,coagulant injection,followed by polymer/flocculation and solids settling in a lamella
clarifier and removal to a sludge thickening tank. Overflow from the clarifier is discharged to a sample box,
while the sludge is dewatered with a filter press. Filtrate from the press is plumbed to the heavy metals
precipitation module for further treatment.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On October 6,November 3,and December 5,2017,Hixson had cadmium and nickel violations,for which
Notices of Violation were issued on December 4, December 6, 2017, and February 28, 2018,
respectively. On December 11, 2017, OCSD held a compliance meeting with Hixson. At the meeting,
Hixson stated that they had observed conflicting results between their in-house testing and their outside
contract laboratory's analyses for the first two self-monitoring events. For each of the monthly sampling
events, Hixson requested a split sample from their contract laboratory,and analyzed the split with the in-
house atomic absorption (AA) spectrophotometer to immediately evaluate compliance. For both the
October and November samples that were in violation, Hixson's in-house analysis showed compliance for
cadmium and nickel. Hixson staff stated they had reached out to their laboratory conceming the
conflicting sample results, and requested that the laboratory re-run their split samples and verify the
concentrations for cadmium and nickel. OCSD suggested that for the following month (January), split
samples be sent to a third-party laboratory for further verification, and Hixson committed to doing so.
At the meeting, OCSD also pointed out the increasing levels of water usage, as well as wastewater
generation and discharge,noted at Hixson's facility. The two sampling events in October and November
2017 reported effluent flows of 55,000 gallons and 60,000 gallons per day,respectively,which were well
above the permit flow-base of 39,000 gallons per day. Hixson stated that the new Anodize line that had
been under construction for the past 3-4 years had finally come online over the summer, and the facility
was having issues with the conductivity rinse controls installed in various rinse tanks on the new line;the
flow controllers were not shutting off due to unanticipated high TDS/mineral concentrations in the influent
city water. OCSD highlighted the concern that Hixson's existing pretreatment system may be undersized
for the higher flows,thereby losing its treatment efficiency and effectiveness for reduction of heavy metals,
particularly cadmium and nickel, which are Hixson's primary metals of concern. The higher water
consumption and outflows also create a dilution condition at the facility. Hixson acknowledged the situation
and stated they were working on a solution.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On February 26,2018,OCSD issued an Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges due to the numerous
violations of cadmium,copper, chromium, and nickel detected during downstream monitoring of Hixon's
discharge. A Notice of Violation was issued on February 28,2018 for self-reported violations of cadmium
and nickel on December 5,2017. On March 12,2018, OCSD held a compliance meeting with Hixson,
where Hixson agreed to a Settlement Agreement to address their continued noncompliance. On March
28,2018,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection during which pretreatment deficiencies were identified
including lack of operating procedures and lack of pretreatment system control and maintenance. These
deficiencies were addressed in the Settlement Agreement sent to Hixson on May 16, 2018.
As of the end of this reporting period, Hixson has not yet signed the settlement agreement and has not
begun to address the previously identified pretreatment issues. OCSD will continue to pursue escalated
4.22
enforcement during the next reporting period.
House Foods America Corp. (1-0310721
House Foods America Corp. (House Foods)manufactures tofu food products from raw soybeans. The
soybeans are transported to the facility on large tanker trucks and stored in silos, then transferred into
large kettles/vats and mixed with water and some lime for cleaning/soaking. The mixture is then pressure
cooked and ground up into slurry to extract the soy milk. Calcium sulfate is added as a coagulant to form
tofu "bricks" in conveyorized formation machines where coloration and flavoring are also added. The
bricks come off the lines and are then CA/QC inspected, then packaged for shipment to
customers. Equipment and floor wash-down water and the soybean soak and cooking water are the main
sources of wastewater discharged to the sewerfrom House Foods. Wastewater from five boiler units,plus
a water softening system for the boiler feed water also contribute to the company's effluent
discharge. Pretreatment is limited to a large underground clarifier.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On November 15,2017, House Foods had a minor pH violation and a Notice of Violation was issued on
December 13,2017. House Foods immediately pumped the clarifier out, and when OCSD returned to
finish sampling for other constituents the following day,the pH had returned to compliance. Acompliance
inspection was conducted on March 29, 2018, and follow-up pH sampling performed after this violation
also demonstrated compliance.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
House Foods had no further violations during this reporting period.
Jellco Containers. Inc. (Permit No. 1-021402)
Jellco Containers, Inc. (Jellco)manufactures corrugated containers. Raw cardboard stock is brought in,
then laid flat so the sheets can pass through a flexographic printer system for application of customer
signage and art designs using various colors of food grade ink, primarily black, blue, and red. The
cardboard is then off loaded from the printers to slit and folding machines for final container assembly
before being stacked on pallets for shipment to customers. Wastewater generated at Jellco consists of
printer ink container washouts (when color changes occur)and equipment and floor wash down water.
The wastewater is collected in pits near each printer, then pumped to Jellco's packaged pretreatment
system. The pretreatment system consists of a pH adjustment/collection tank,where polymer flocculant is
added by chemical feed pump along with caustic injection and mechanical mixing,then pumped through a
vacuum assisted rotary drum filter,where the solids accumulate and are scraped off from the outside and
into a bin for wastehauling off-site. The filtered wastewater is drained from the inside of the drum to a
cleanout and sewer connection.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On August 15, 2017, Jellco had a copper violation, for which a Notice of Violation was issued on
September 19,2017. Though the ink used in the printing process has been described as plant-based,and
not containing significant concentrations of heavy metals, copper is detectable in most of the wastewater
samples collected by OCSD and Jellco. On September 21, 2017, OCSD conducted a compliance
inspection and routine sampling during which Jellco stated that an ink spill may have occurred before their
self-monitoring sampling in August, and therefore caused the violation, Jellco also stated that they had
conducted a retraining event for flexographic printer operators to wipe up and clean significant ink spills,
and not flush the spill into the collection pits with water. OCSD recommended that a small collection tank
be installed after the vacuum drum filter on the pretreatment system, so Jellco could conduct QA/QC
observation on the quality and color of the treated wastewater before discharge to the sewer. Jellco stated
they would schedule the tank to be installed. OCSD's sampling results showed compliance.
4.23
January 1 —June 30, 2018
Jellco had no further violations during this reporting period.
Kinsbursky Brothers Supply. Inc. (Permit No. 1-021424)
Kinsbursky,Brothers Supply Inc. (Kinsbursky)operates a large recycling and reclamation facility where
lead/nickel cadmium batteries and automobile catalytic convertors are brought in to be dismantled.
The lead cathode/anode plates are removed from the battery cases and the electrolyte solution is
drained and filtered then transferred to Kinsbursky's pretreatment area. Plastic battery cases are also
cleaned and shredded into granules for shipment to offsite vendors and further recycling. Wastewater
at Kinsbursky comes primarily from the removal and treatment of the electrolyte solutions from the
batteries, plus plate cleaning and floor washdown water. The pretreatment at Kinsbursky consists of
pH adjustment and solids precipitation/filtration before discharge to a sample box/Floor drain with
sewer connection.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On January 26,2018, Kinsbursky had a cadmium violation,for which a Notice of Violation was issued
on February 22, 2018. On March 9,2018,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and resampling
during which Kinsbursky explained that the cadmium violation had occurred due to the unusually high
volume of Ni/Cd batteries processed that day and the pH was not adjusted properly for cadmium to
precipitate. Kinsbursky has taken prompt action by limiting processing of Ni/Cd batteries until further
process adjustments are made. Furthermore,the company will ensure that wastewater treatment
operator is notified prior to processing cadmium batteries so that treatment can be adjusted as
necessary to achieve a higher pH. Additionally, Kinsbursky is researching additives for more effective
metal precipitation and will notify OCSD prior to making any changes. Subsequent sampling and self-
monitoring showed compliance.
OCSD will continue to monitor Kinsbursky's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Linco Industries. Inc. (Permit No. 1-0212531
Linco Industries, Inc.(Linco)is a small metal parts stripping and cleaning facility. Various parts,including
automobile and motorcycle wheels and other accessories, are brought in by customers for stripping of
paint and other organic type coatings in cold and hot strip baths,followed by immersion rinsing or manual
spray rinsing in a large spray booth. The two cold strip tanks contain ethanolamine-based chemistry,while
the hot strip tank is a Kolene salt bath, heated to approximately 400 degrees Fahrenheit. The rinse tank
after the Kolene bath is a low volume overflow rinse,controlled and treated with a pH monitor and sulfuric
acid solution to reduce the pH down to the 9.0—10.0 range,then pumped over to an above-ground four-
stage clarifier for solids settling before draining into a collection drum used as the sample point. The
wastewater from the drum is then pumped overhead to a clean out for the front office bathroom. The
manual spray rinse booth after cold strip collects the rinsewater and pumps into a holding tank for minimal
solids treatment and residual oil separation before pumping to the clarifier.
In January 2017, Linco had a zinc violation which was issued as a Notice of Violation in February 2017.
During OCSD's routine sampling of Linco's discharge in March 2017, Linco informed OCSD that the pH
controller on the hot Kolene strip bath rinse had failed,causing the violation,butwas repaired immediately
upon discovery. Linco conducted resampling in March 2017 and the results showed compliance. OCSD's
sample results were also in compliance for zinc and the other heavy metals.
In May 2017, Linco Industries had an oil&grease violation,for which a Notice of Violation was issued in
July 2017. Linco uses a mineral oil material as a vapor emissions barrier on the surface of the cold strip
tanks and has experimented with various wastewater skimming and separation/removal techniques for the
4.24
oil from the wastewater generated from the rinsing of parts in the wash booth after the cold strip process.
In 2015, Linco installed a belt skimmer system in the wastewater collection drum after the clarifier, but it
proved mechanically unreliable and has since been removed. In June 2017, OCSD conducted a
compliance/permit renewal inspection and resampling, and the results showed compliance.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On August 22 and 23, 2017, Linco had two oil &grease violations,for which Notices of Violation were
issued on September 19, 2017 and October 2, 2017, respectively. Upon notification of the violations,
Linco investigated and purchased an upgraded type of oil absorbent mats to install inside their clarifier and
sampling drum. Linco also conducted a multi-day sampling for oil&grease in September 2017,and the
results showed compliance. On October 26, 2017, OCSD conducted resampling and the results were
also in compliance.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
Linco had no further violations during this reporting period.
LM Chrome Corporation (Permit No. 1-511361)
LM Chrome Corporation (LM Chrome) is an automotive wheel plating facility. Wastewater generating
operations include alkaline cleaning, zincate stripping, zincating, acid activation, copper plating,
electrocleaning,anti-tarnish,nickel plating,and chrome plating,and associated rinses. LM Chrome utilizes
both batch and continuous pretreatment systems (PTS). The continuous PTS consists of cyanide
destruction, chromium reduction, neutralization,flocculation/settling, sludge holding,filter pressing, and
final clarification. The batch treatment tank is used for manually treating spent cleaners.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On August 1,2017, LM Chrome had a cyanide(total)violation,for which a Notice of Violation was issued
on August 15,2017. On August 17,2017,OCSD conducted resampling and the results also showed a
cyanide(total)violation,with a Notice of Violation issued on September 20,2017. On September 5,2017,
LM Chrome sent OCSD a letter describing the corrective actions LM Chrome planned to implement,
including: close monitoring of the chemical feed pumps to ensure delivery of the appropriate amount of
chemicals for cyanide treatment: ensuring that the pH and ORP probes are operating optimally: and
sampling each treated batch to ensure compliance (via analysis by an independent laboratory) prior to
discharging to the sewer.
On October 9, 2017, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and resampling, during which OCSD
noted that LM Chrome was maintaining cyanide batch discharge logs. However,each treated batch is only
tested for compliance using cyanide test strips. The resampling results showed compliance.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On January 17,2018, LM chrome had another cyanide violation and a Notice of Violation was issued on
February 6, 2018. On May 14 and 15, 2018, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and routine
sampling, during which OCSD noted that LM Chrome had been keeping daily logs of its pretreatment
system operating parameters including the pH and ORP settings and the cyanide test strip results of each
treated cyanide batch. The sample,however,yielded another cyanide violation. A Notice of Violation was
issued on May 30,2018.
Due to the recurring cyanide violations, OCSD will issue LM Chrome an Order to Cease Noncompliant
Discharges and hold a Compliance Meeting with LM Chrome during the next quarter.
4.25
LSW Enterprises. LLC (Permit No. 1-521863)
LSW Enterprises, LLC (LSW)is a facility that receives, renders,and treats used cooking oil and grease
trap waste from food establishments. LSW removes solid particles and water from received waste;the
used cooking oil and grease are then sold on secondary markets or exported to refineries for biofuel
production. The wastewater is pH adjusted and discharged to the sewer.
July 1 -December 31, 2017
On August 24, 2017, the City of Anaheim reported solid blockage caused by the presence of oil and
grease in the sewer downstream of LSW's facility. On August 31,2017,OCSD issued an Order to Cease
Noncompliant Discharges(Cease Order)requiring LSW to take immediate action to ensure compliance
with OCSD's Ordinance. On September 1,2017,OCSD held a compliance meeting with LSW, in which
LSW agreed to discontinue certain practices which were thought to be causing the excessive discharge of
oil and grease to the sewer.
January 1 -June 30, 2018
On February 2 and 8,2018,the Cityof Anaheim again reported solid blockage from oil and grease in the
sewer downstream of LSW's facility. On February 7,2018,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and
observed an active flow of excessive amounts of oil and grease material in the sewer line downstream of
LSW's facility. On February 8, 2018, OCSD issued another Cease Order requiring LSW to cease
noncompliant discharge of excessive oil and grease into the OCSD's sewerage system. On February 26,
2018,OCSD issued a Compliance Inspection Findings and Requirements letter requiring LSW to install a
final holding tank and an effluent flow meter;LSW requested and OCSD granted an extension to complete
the installation by June 10,2018,which LSW had failed to comply with and refused to make progress to
this end. A Notice of Violation was issued to LSW on March 8,2018 for a pH discharge violation occurring
during a January 30,2018 sampling event.
OCSD staff conducted follow-up inspections of the facility on March 8,March 14,April 4,April 14,April
24,June 5,and June 11,2018,and issued a compliance requirements letter on March 28,2018. During
each inspection,LSW attempted to interfere with,delay,resist,or refuse site access to OCSD staff. LSW
had also refused to provide documentation related to the handling and disposition of wastewater generated
at the facility. Furthermore, LSW accepted and treated material containing wastewater from outside
OCSD's service area without prior approval,which is a violation of the special conditions in LSW's permit
and OCSD's Ordinance. OCSD issued more cease orders on April 5 and June 27,2018, and another
compliance requirement letter on May 29,2018,related to LSW's ongoing noncompliance with perm it and
Ordinance conditions.
LSW requested to discontinue the Class 1 permit, which is void as of July 19,2018.
Manufactured Packaging Products (Permit No. 1-521793)
Manufactured Packaging Products(MPP)manufactures corrugated containers,primarily cardboard boxes
for grocery,electronics, and retail industry packaging needs. Corrugated sheet stock is purchased from
offsite vendors, and then run through flexographic printers using food grade inks of various colors.
Finished containers are packaged for shipment to customers on pallets or stacked and shrink wrapped for
shipment. Wastewater is generated from the washdown of the printer plates and ink containers on the
printers during ink color changeouts. The water is collected in trenches to a sump and then pumped out to
MPP's wastewater treatment system.
January 1 -June 30, 2018
On March 8, 2018, MPP had copper and molybdenum violations, for which a Notice of Violation was
4.26
issued on April 23,2018. On May 9,2018,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection during which MPP
attributed the source of both violations to a faulty pH probe in the treatment equipment. Additionally,the
maintenance personnel put the treatment system in manual mode instead of the automatic,due to issues
with the pH probe. The operators continued to inject chemicals manually thereby not allowing a proper
coagulation process. MPP's corrective action consisted of replacing the defective probe, maintaining
additional pH probes on site,and re-training the staff on proper operation of treatment system,safe use of
chemicals, controls, instrumentation, and documentation. The resampling results showed compliance.
MPP was published as significantly non-compliant for copper and molybdenum discharge violations.
OCSD will continue to monitor MPP's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Nalco Cal Water. LLC (Permit No. 1-521748)
Nalco Cal Water,LLC(Nalco)performs ion exchange tank regeneration on both cation,anion,and mixed
bed resins. Cation regeneration uses acidic solutions and anion regeneration uses alkaline solutions in the
regeneration process. Wastewater from the regeneration process is discharged to floor drains,collected,
and pumped to a 1025-gallon collection tank where it is directed into either an acidic or alkaline wastewater
holding tank based on the pH set point of 8.5. Water is then blended and discharged through the sample
point. Nalco stated the columns regenerated are only used in purifying fresh incoming city water, and no
columns are used in treatment of industrial waste streams.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
In September 2017, during a downstream operation along Petra Lane in Placentia, OCSD noted that
significant variations in pH were observed with continuous pH data loggers. It was determined that the pH
of wastewater discharged from Nalco exceeded both the high and low limits, with pHs as high as 13.71
S.U. and as low as 0.81 S.U. recorded. On October 16, 2017, OCSD issued an Order to Cease
Noncompliant Discharges to Nalco. On October 19, 2017, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection
which confirmed issues with overflow of non-neutralized wastewater through the sample point to the sewer.
On October 23,2017,OCSD held a compliance meeting with Nalco where the company provided plans to
rectify their wastewater discharge and treatment issues. During the meeting,Nalco provided OCSD with a
proposal to address interim plans, as well as long-term plans,for compliance. Interim solutions included
modification of pH set points and calibration procedures,continuous pH recording,and corrections to spill
containment overflow. Long-term solutions included a timeline to install a reconfigured pretreatment
system that would operate as a batch system rather than continuous. The company agreed to make
biweekly progress reports and intended to award the winning bid for the system modifications on January
10, 2018 with the completion of the project on April 9, 2018.
On December 14, 2017, OCSD held a second compliance meeting with Nalco to get an update on the
plans, and to bring the Parent Company, Ecolab, into discussions for the long-term solution. Nalco
presented updated plans for a new batch treatment system, complete with monitoring points installed for
the purpose of maintaining a compliant pH.
January 1. 2018—June 30,2018
On January 11,2018, OCSD issued a Compliance Meeting Summary and Requirements Letter to
approve Nalco's project timeline and implementation of their new treatment system. Although the
installation completion and system operational date of April 9, 2018 was postponed to September 1,
2018 due to equipment procurement issues, the company has made considerable progress and
implemented various interim controls to stay within compliance during this reporting period. Nalco has
made biweekly progress reports as required and kept OCSD updated in advance of all operational
changes.
OCSD will continue to monitor Nalco's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
4.27
Performance Powder, Inc. (Permit No. 1-521805)
Performance Powder, Inc. (Performance Powder) is a powdercoat service company. Various parts
made of aluminum and steel are brought in by customers and prewashed using an alkaline cleaner,
then rinsed with an iron phosphate solution. In addition, the parts are rinsed through a conveyorized
recirculating spray line for medium to larger parts, along with a manual spray booth for smaller,oddly
shaped parts. After prewash,the parts are allowed to air dry, and are then powdercoated,followed by
baking and final curing in large ovens. Rinses from the alkaline and iron phosphate wash line and
manual spray booth at Performance Powder are collected in a 500-gallon clarifier,with overflow
through a standpipe and sewer connection. Performance Powder wastehauls spent alkaline and iron
phosphate chemistry, and conducts clarifier maintenance at the same time, once or twice per year.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On May 9,2017, Performance Powder had a zinc violation,forwhich a Notice of Violation was issued on
July 21,2017. On August 3,2017,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and routine sampling and
spoke with Performance Powder staff regarding the zinc noncompliance in May. The company
representative stated that the laboratory technician who performs the quarterly self-monitoring may have
placed the sampling equipment probe near the bottom of the clarifier, so the probe may have collected
some solids with the sample. Upon receipt of OCSD's Notice of Violation, Performance Powder had the
clarifier pumped out and cleaned. On August 18,2017,Performance Powder conducted resampling. The
results of OCSD's sample and Performance Powder's resampling both showed compliance.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
Performance Powder had no further violations during this reporting period.
OCSD will continue to monitor Performance Powder's discharge and compliance status on a quarterly
basis.
Platinum Surface Coating. Inc. (Permit No. 1-521852)
Platinum Surface Coating, Inc. (Platinum)performs copper, nickel, and chrome electroplating of
aluminum and steel auto rims and centers, plus other types of metal parts brought in by outside
customers. All the rinses at Platinum are static and are changed out once a week. Spent chemicals
and rinses are segregated and treated in batches. Treatment process includes chrome reduction, CN
destruction, pH adjustment, and mixing and settling of heavy metals in a settling/treatment tank.
Chrome reduction/CN destruction batches are treated separately prior to getting comingled with the
rest of metal-bearing wastewater. Some of the spent process solutions(e.g.from acid tanks)are
hauled off.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On May 7, 2018, Platinum had a cyanide violation and a Notice of Violation was issued on May 30,
2018. On June 12,2018, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and resampling. Platinum tests
each batch prior to discharge to ensure compliance, and did not have an indication of non-compliance
in their testing. OCSD advised Platinum on the appropriate sampling location to verify that cyanide had
been destroyed prior to commingling of non-cyanide bearing wastestreams. Platinum began to cover
the final holding tank to avoid any cross-contamination or accidental discharge of untreated wastewater
into the tank by the workers.
OCSD will continue to monitor Platinum's discharge and compliance status on a semiannual basis.
4.28
Precision Anodizing & Plating, Inc. (Permit No. 1-521809)
Precision Anodizing&Plating, Inc. (Precision)performs sulfuric anodizing, bright dipping,zinc chloride
and alkaline zinc electroplating, chrome conversion coatings, dye coloring, and sealing with nickel
acetate and sodium dichromate for the various parts from the construction and automotive industries,
plus larger enclosures/cabinets for the medical and computer/electronics industries. Wastewater
generated at Precision includes the rinse waters from the wet process lines,which are directed to a
continuous pretreatment system. Pretreatment at Precision includes a dual train,one for anodize
wastewater and one for general metals/zinc-nickel wastewater and consists of pH adjustment, mixing,
and heavy metals precipitation. Precision also employs a chrome reduction module for treatment of
rinse waters after chemfilm and chromate conversion coating processes.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On May 8, 2018, Precision had a Zinc violation and a Notice of Violation was issued on May 29,2018.
On June 7, 2018, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and resampling during which high levels
of sludge were observed in the clarifiers at the end of both treatment lines which caused the zinc
violation. Currently, Precision has only a small filter press which is limiting the ability to pump out the
clarifiers. Precision is planning to add a new filter press to resolve the issue. Additionally, Precision
will increase the retention time by lowering the process rinses and limiting the flow through the clarifiers
to avoid future sludge carry-over into the sample box. Precision is planning to clean out the sample
box more often as well.
OCSD will continue to monitor Precision's discharge and compliance status in the next reporting period
and will follow-up with Precision to ensure installation of the filter press is done in a timely manner.
Precision Circuits West, Inc. (Permit No. 1-011008)
Precision Circuits West, Inc. (Precision Circuits)is a job shop manufacturer of printed circuit boards for
commercial, industrial, medical, military/defense, and telecommunication applications. Waste and
Wastewater generating operation(s)include acid cleaning,ammonium etching,aqueous fume scrubbing,
automatic scrubbing, Cobra-Bond (brown oxide), copper plating, microetch, photo-film developer/fixer,
predip,resist stripping,rinsing(running,spray,static),screen cleaning,screen making,sulfuric predip,tin
plating,tin predip,and tin stripping. Precision Circuits utilizes a continuous hydroxide precipitation system
for wastewater treatment.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On May 18,2018, Precision Circuits had a copper violation and a Notice of Violation was issued on June
7,2018. On June 26,2018,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and resampling. Precision Circuits
could not identify the source of the copper violation,and had not had a violation for more than 10 years. It
is believed that the violation may have been the result of solids buildup in Precision Circuits'sample box.
Precision Circuits had the clarifier and sample box cleaned out upon learning of the noncompliance. The
results of resampling showed compliance.
OCSD will continue to monitor Precision circuits'discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Prudential Overall Supply (Permit No. 1-071235)
Prudential Overall Supply(Prudential) is in the business of uniform and linen rental and cleaning. The
facility in Irvine is equipped with automated laundering machine and specializes in cleaning and
redistribution of uniforms, mats, napkins, and aprons. Prudential utilizes a collection basin and a multi-
stage underground clarifier for suspended solids separation. Wastewater from the facility is discharged
into the open-topped below-grade basin from which it is pumped through a screen shaker to remove lint
and larger solids. After passing through the shaker,wastewater discharges back into the basin where it
4.29
gravity flows through a multi-stage underground clarifier before discharging to the sewer system. The
sample point is the final stage of the clarifier.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On June 27,2017, Prudential had a minor oil&grease violation which was issued as a Notice of Violation
on July 24,2017. On August 24,2017,OCSD conducted resampling and the results showed compliance.
Subsequent sampling also showed compliance.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
Prudential had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to monitor Prudential's
discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Pulmuone Wildwood. Inc. (Permit No. 1-531397)
Pulmuone Wildwood, Inc.(Pulmuone)manufactures,processes,and packages tofu products from flaked
soy bean meal and softened water. The operations performed include:mixing of soybean meal into whey,
filtration to separate soy milk, steam heating of soy milk, coagulation (using magnesium chloride and
calcium sulfate)of soy milk and belt press drying,and for some products,cooking and/or Flavoring of the
tofu. The prepared food products are packaged at the facility for distribution. Waste liquids from the
processing of the soy material, along with cleaning and sterilization (acid &alkaline) solutions from the
process line equipment,are the only sources of wastewater at this facility. Pulmuone employs a large,two-
stage clarifier for the removal of solids and the separation of organic oils, in addition to pH adjustment.
In February 2017, OCSD held a compliance meeting with Pulmuone to discuss the company's chronic
failure to submit self-monitoring reports(SMRs)and the company's failure to correct data in a previously
submitted SMR. Pulmuone brought the missing SMRs to the compliance meeting; however,the SMRs
were found to be deficient and incomplete. In addition, pH values exceeding the discharge limits were
reported in the submitted SMRs. On March 8 and 9,2017,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and
routine sampling. The sampling results also showed noncompliance with the pH discharge limits, and
Notices of Violation were issued on April 4 and April 27, 2017. Pulmuone advised OCSD that their pH
adjustment system had not been working for at least the past 18 months. Thus,Pulmuone was directed to
repair the pH adjustment equipment as soon as possible.
In late March 2017,OCSD held another compliance meeting with Pulmuone to discuss the continued pH
violations and the continued failure to submit the missing SMRs. In the meeting, OCSD informed
Pulmuone that OCSD planned to issue an Administrative Complaint(AC)forthe aforementioned violations
and provided Pulmuone an opportunity to enter into a Settlement Agreement in lieu of being issued the AC.
Pulmuone agreed to settle, submit all delinquent reports, and to hire a consultant to evaluate the
pretreatment equipment. On May 18,23,24,and 25,2017,further pH violations occurred and were issued
Notices of Violation on May 31,June 13, and June 15, 2017.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
OCSD and Pulmuone executed the Settlement Agreement in August 2017, resulting in a civil penalty of
$35,000 in addition to taking corrective actions with facility equipment and operations. On August 15,
September 25 and 26,2017, Pulmuone had further pH violations which were issued Notices of Violation
on October 23 and December 13, 2017. On November 7, 2017, OCSD conducted a compliance
inspection and resampling,during which Pulmuone again violated pH limits,and a Notice of Violation was
issued on November 16,2017. The new treatment equipment(screening,DAF,and skimmer)was on-line
during the inspection,but was still being adjusted for performance. During the inspection,OCSD cautioned
Pulmuone that continued noncompliance would likely lead to additional fines.
4.30
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On January 15,2018,Pulmuone had another pH violation and a notice of violation was issued on January
24, 2018 and an Order to Cease issued on February 27, 2018. On March 14, 2018, OCSD held a
compliance meeting with Pulmuone where the company submitted details of their ongoing efforts to
improve pH compliance and recent sampling suggesting improved treatmentsystem performance. OCSD
explained to Pulmuone that continued noncompliance would result in increased enforcement, including
additional administrative penalties. Subsequent sampling showed compliance.
OCSD will continue to monitor Pulmuone's discharge and compliance status during the next reporting
period.
0-Flex, Inc. (Permit No. 1-600337)
Q-Flex, Inc.(Q-Flex)manufactures single-sided,double-sided,multi-layer flex,flexible heaters,rigid flex,
and sculptured flex printed circuit boards(PCBs)thatare used in aerospace,telecommunications,medical,
and government/military applications. The company specializes in prototypes and exotic designs using a
wide range of materials and support services. Q-Flex outsources plating of the boards.
The wastewater-generating operations at Q-Flex include micro-etching, film developing, and screen
washing. Q-Flex does not have a pretreatment system; the spent micro-etching and film developing
solutions are wastehauled and only the screen wash water is discharged directly to the sewer without
treatment.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On September 20, 2017, Q-Flex had a silver violation, for which a Notice of Violation was issued on
November 15,2017. On November 3,2017,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection,during which Q-
Flex indicated that the silver recovery unit apparently was not functioning properly even though it was
recently serviced. As a corrective action,Q-Flex started wastehauling the spentfilm developing solution.
On November 14,2017, OCSD conducted resampling for silver and the results showed compliance.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
Q-Flex had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to monitor Q-Flex's
discharge and compliance status on a quarterly basis.
Rolls-Royce HTC (Permit No. 1-600212)
Rolls-Royce High Temperature Composites(Rolls-Royce HTC)is an R&D manufacturing facilityfabricating
R&D parts for the commercial aviation industry and specifically for Rolls-Royce's aircraft engine parts
manufacturing division. The parts are fabricated from composite and ceramic materials in a high
temperature vacuum deposition process,which uses hydrogen chloride(HCL)gas plus other proprietary
additives to form the parts in large vacuum deposition chambers. Wastewater is generated from the
washing of the vacuum hoses and fittings with deionized water to dissolve the residue off the parts. Due to
the presence of the HCL in the residue, the wash water turns acidic and must be neutralized before
discharge to the sewer. Rolls-Royce HTC was issued two Class l permits in November 2016forthe newly
opened facility: one for the parts wash water and the other for a fume scrubber system attached to the
vacuum deposition chambers, which also requires pH adjustment of scrubber overflow water before
discharge to the sewer.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On June 7,2017, Rolls-Royce HTC had a copper violation,for which a Notice of Violation was issued on
July 24, 2017. According to Rolls-Royce HTC, the fittings from the vacuum chambers are made of
4.31
stainless steel,which is known to contain chrome and nickel but no appreciable amounts of copper. As a
high quantity of solids were observed in the sinks and discharge sump and afterthe caustic pH adjustment
treatment system, OCSD advised Rolls-Royce that installation of a filter system at the discharge sump
before pump-out to the sewer may be beneficial.
On August 29, 2017, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and resampling, during which OCSD
observed that Rolls-Royce HTC had installed filter bags in the sump for each parts washing sink. As a
result, the solution observed in the sump was much cleaner, and the resampling results showed
compliance. OCSD returned to Rolls-Royce HTC in August,September,and October for further sampling,
and found the filter bags and sump in a similar condition as before. The results for the additional sampling
events were also in compliance for heavy metals.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
Rolls-Royce HTC had no further violations during this reporting period. OCSD will continue to monitor
Rolls-Royce HTC's discharge and compliance status om a quarterly basis.
S&C Oil (Permit No. 1-581175)
S&C Oil extracts crude oil from one oil well in Huntington Beach. The extracted mixture of groundwater
and crude oil is routed to a large cylindrical tank,which acts as a primary oillwater separator. The water
from the bottom of this tank is passed through an above-ground,three-stage clarifier equipped with an air
diffuser in the second stage for removal of volatile organic compounds.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On November 21,2017,S&C Oil had an oil&grease(O&G)violation,for which a Notice of Violation was
issued on January 2,2018.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On January 23,2018,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection to determine the source of the violation
and appropriate corrective actions. S&C Oil stated that the clarifier had not been pumped out in 6 months
and was most likely the reason for the high O&G. Going forward, S&C Oil plans to increase the clarifier
clean-out frequency to once per month and oil skimming will be performed daily. During the inspection,a
crack in the cement clarifier with some water leakage was noted and the operator stated that there are
plans to repair it. The owner of the site also responded with an email on February 27,2018,stating that
S&C Oil has begun using a chlorine tablet to treat for algae in addition to the increased clarifier inspections
and clean-outs.
S&C Oil had no further violations during this reporting period.
Soldermask. Inc. (Permit No. 1-031341)
Soldermask, Inc.(Soldermask)is a printed circuit boardjob shop specializing in solder mask services and
making stainless steel stencils used for solder paste application or component verification. Wastewateris
generated by the manual pumice scrubbing, photoresist developing, screen cleaning, and associated
rinses. Soldermask does not have a pretreatment system apart from a four-stage above-ground clarifier.
The spent ferric etch solution, electropolishing solution,and subsequent static rinses are wastehauled.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On July 14,2017,Soldermask had copper and nickel violations,for which a Notice ofMolation was issued
on July 26, 2017. On July 31 and August 15, 2017, OCSD conducted compliance inspections to
determine the source of the violations. The primary source of wastewater is the pumice scrubber table
4.32
which uses a spray and contains a small volume of water. This water overflows to a series of small (5
gallon)buckets. The wastewater then flows to a small sump of similar volume where it is pumped to the
clarifier. The clarifier was badly corroded but didn't seem to have any hydraulic or excessive solid buildup
issues.
The pH of the wastewater at the scrubbing table and in the successive buckets was in the range oft to 2.5
S.U. Soldermask staff stated that the low pH was most likely caused by the addition of acetic acid to the
scrubber table, for which there is no procedure or operational control. Over time, operators had added
excessive acetic acid and lowered the pH, causing copper and nickel to become soluble and remain in
solution. In addition, there were plastic structures on the scrubbing table that had residual deposits
causing low pH. Soldermask's corrective actions consisted of discontinuing the use of acetc acid,using
pH probe to check the pH in the cascading tanks and clarifier, and utilizing a counter-current static rinse
operation for the etcher. In response to the non-compliances, OCSD increased Soldermask's self-
monitoring frequency for copper and nickel from quarterly to monthly.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On April 5, 2018, Soldermask had a nickel violation,for which a Notice of Violation was issued on April
23, 2018. On May 21, 2018, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection during which Soldermask
indicated that the violation occurred due to build-up of solids in the clarifier that came loose during the
sampling event. Soldermask's corrective actions included replacement of the clarifier tanks and piping,
installation of a filter to catch solid particles from the etcher rinse, a regular clean-out schedule of the
clarifier tanks, and regular testing for nickel in the clarifier.
OCSD staff will continue to monitor Soldermask's discharge and compliance status during the next
reporting period.
Stepan Company(Permit No. 1-0 21 6 741
Stepan Company(Stepan)manufactures surfactants,for use in consumer and industrial cleaning
compounds. Surfactants are used in the manufacture of shampoos,dishwasher and laundry
detergents. Manufacturing utilizes three processes: continuous falling film sulfonation,detergent
blending by batch processing of alkanolamides, and detergent blending by batch processing of betaine.
Wastewater is generated from softener regeneration,warehouse rinses,wash down,tank calibration,
cooling tower bleed, a SOa scrubber, and an ammonia scrubber. The pretreatment system consists of
a 21,000-gallon round underground sump/clarifier. The wastewater is commingled and mixed by an
agitator. Caustic soda is used to adjust the pH and defoamer is also added. Wastewater is then
pumped to one of two tanks(20,000 and 24,000 gallons), where it is mixed using a recirculation pump.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On June 1, 2018, Stepan had a 1,4-dioxane violation.
OCSD will issue a Notice of Violation for the 1,4-dioxane violation and conduct a compliance inspection
during the next reporting period to determine Stepan's compliance with permit requirements related to
treatment for 1,4-dioxane.
Thermal-Vac Technology. Inc. (Permit No. 1-021282)
Thermal-Vac Technology, Inc. (Thermal-Vac) is a job shop that assembles products ranging from heat
exchangers,flow fittings,chassis,to wave guides and surgical devices. Thermal-Vac receives machined
stainless steel and aluminum parts and is contracted primarily for their heat treatment, brazing and
assemblywork. Stainless steel products undergo heat treatment,acetone or ultrasonic cleaning,and final
assembly,oiling,and packaging. Aluminum products are cleaned,etched,surface deoxidized,descaled,
bright dipped, followed by part pre-heating/water removal, and fluoride salt bath brazing. The parts are
then assembled,oiled,and packaged to be delivered to the customer. Although Thermal-Vac has nickel
4.33
plating capabilities, reportedly the process is rarely used due to discontinuation of the space shuttle
program.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On April 3,2018,Thermal-Vac had a nickel violation,for which a Notice of Violation was issued on May
23, 2018. On June 11, 2018, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection during which Thermal-Vac
indicated that the most likely source of the nickel was from an employee rinsing out a bucket of nickel rinse
water, probably due to the construction of the new processing line and pretreatment system. Thermal-
Vac's corrective actions include updating their operating procedures and retraining workers to ensure that
all wastewater is treated and disposed of properly. Thermal-Vac has one source of nickel in a rinse that is
on a close loop ion exchange system. Thermal-Vac's current pretreatment system for all other rinses
consists of pH neutralization in a holding tank before discharge to the sewer. The new system is expected
to consist of an alkaline holding tank, an acidic holding tank, a batch tank, a filter press, and a final pH
adjust tank. The batch tank is expected to be automated for metals precipitation as well as for two-stage
cyanide destruction,with cyanide and non-cyanide bearing waste stream segregation.
OCSD staff will continue to monitor Thermal-Vac's discharge and compliance status during the next report
period.
Toyota Racing Development (Permit No. 1-071059)
Toyota Racing Development(TRD)receives engines used in recent auto races,strips them down,cleans
and tests the parts,and rebuilds them. New engines are also assembled at the facility. Some parts are
machined on site, and research and design operations are performed as well. Processes include
dynamometer testing of finished engines, parts machining, parts grinding, welding, polishing, cleaning,
non-destructive inspection,engine assembly,stock storage,and quality control. Wastewater is generated
by the following operations:dye penetrant rinse from inspection process,parts washer rinse and aqueous
parts cleaner from teardown operations,condensate from compressors,engine cooling water from testing,
and miscellaneous floor waste. Pretreatment performed at TRD includes a three-stage clarifier followed by
two particle filtration steps, one clay bed, and two granular activated carbon (GAC) beds.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On February 5, 2018, TRD had an oil &grease violation, for which a Notice of Violation was issued on
February 26, 2018. On March 22,2018, OCSD conducted a compliance inspection during which TRD
explained that the GAC filter media was in need of replacement at the time of the violation and TRD had
already made the replacement prior to this inspection. Samples collected since the violation, including
additional voluntary sampling performed by TRD, have been compliant.
OCSD staff will continue to monitor TRD's discharge and compliance status during the next report period.
Ultra-Pure Metal Finishing, Inc. (Permit No. 1-021703)
Ultra-Pure Metal Finishing, Inc. (Ultra-Pure)is a metal finishingjob shop. Customer-supplied parts made
of aluminum and steel are brought in for anodize or chemfilm,colored dyes are used for aluminum parts,
and acid preclean and zinc plate are used for steel parts. Several preclean and surface activation tanks
are employed as well. Wastewater generation consists of the rinsewater following the chemical process
tanks, and batch treatment of some spent process chemicals. Wastewater treatment at Ultra-Pure
consists of hexavalent chrome reduction, heavy metals reduction and precipitation using caustic for pH
adjust along with coagulant addition,followed by polymer/flocculation for metals precipitation before final
clarification,and discharge of the effluent to a sample box/sewer connection. Solids from the clarifier are
pumped to a sludge thickening tank, where a filter press is utilized to dewater solids, and the filtrate
returned to the beginning of the pretreatment system.
4.34
In March and May 2017, Ultra-Pure had zinc violations. During the March sampling event, OCSD noted
multiple issues with the pretreatment system including high solids buildup in the clarifier,a nonoperational
filter press,a disorganized work area,lack of treatment operator coverage during all shifts,and a potential
blockage between treatment tanks.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On July 20, 2017, OCSD issued a compliance requirement letter, requiring Ultra-Pure to attend a
compliance meeting. On August 3,2017,OCSD held a compliance meeting with Ultra-Pure to discuss the
zinc violations and corrective actions. On August 8,2017,OCSD issued a compliance requirements letter
requiring Ultra-Pure to retain a qualified industrial wastewater treatment operator,create maintenance logs,
and update their pretreatment procedure. On September 21, 2017, OCSD conducted a compliance
inspection,during which OCSD noted that the issues with equipment in the pretreatment area had already
been corrected. The baffle plates in the clarifier were replaced and the clarifier had been cleaned.
Maintenance logs for instrumentation and equipment were created and in use. Ultra-Pure had not yet hired
a qualified wastewater treatment operator,however,a former wastewater treatment operator had returned
to work and both the owner and the operator were planning to obtain CW EA certification.
No violations were detected during this reporting period.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
Ultra-Pure had no further violations during this reporting period either.
United Pharma, LLC (Permit No. 1-531418)
United Pharma, LLC(United Pharma) is a manufacturer of various soft gelatin nutritional supplement
capsules from customer-supplied bulk liquids. Products are not pharmaceutically active. Wastewater
is generated from the cleaning and sterilization operations performed on mixing and dosing equipment
used for gelatin capsules. Pretreatment is limited to an underground clarifier.
July 1 —December 31, 2017
On August 15, 2017 and September 25, 2017, United Pharma had pH violations, for which Notices of
Violation were issued on October 23,2017 and November 16,2017, respectively. On November 6 and
9, 2017, OCSD conducted compliance inspections during which the pH was again out of compliance.
Notices of Violation were issued on December 13, 2017 and January 17, 2018. The matter was
discussed with United Pharma and the company indicated that manual pH adjustment was periodically
performed. OCSD advised United Pharma that this practice was not adequate to ensure long term
compliance with pH limits.
January 1 —June 30, 2018
On February 27,2018,an order to cease was issued to United Pharma requiring the permittee to attend a
compliance meeting. On March 15,2018,a compliance meeting was held in response to the continued
pH issues. During the meeting, United Pharma agreed to install a continuous pH adjustment system and
maintain improved attention to manually adjusting pH in the interim. A compliance requirement letter was
issued on March 29,2018 requiring the installation of an automated treatment system by June 1,2018.
As the compliance date neared,United Pharma requested more time due to contractor installation issues.
Sampling performed since the meeting had been compliant.
OCSD will continue to monitor United Pharma's discharge and compliance status and verify installation of
the new treatment equipment during the next reporting period.
4.35
Universal Alloy Corp. (Permit No. 1-021706)
Universal Alloy Corp. (UAC) is a manufacturer of extruded aluminum parts, primarily for the
aviation/aerospace industries. The extruded parts are cut to length, straightened, and/or twisted as
necessary,then 50%of the finished parts are solution heat treated in two large silo-type heating systems
using glycol and demineralized city water,followed by final rinsing. Wastewater is also generated by die
cleaning and detergent wash operations. Pretreatment is limited to filtration of the detergent wash line and
final clarification.
July 1 -December 31, 2017
On December 12,2017, UAC had a molybdenum violation.
January 1 -June 30, 2018
On January 18,2018, a Notice of Violation was issued for the molybdenum violation. On February 15,
2018,OCSD conducted a compliance inspection and resampling. During the inspection,OCSD inquired
about potential sources of molybdenum at the facility and UAC later supplied MSDS information that
indicated molybdenum presence in their cooling tower additive. UAC has subsequently changed out the
solution using an additive that does not contain molybdenum.
UAC had no further violations during this reporting period.
4.36
chapter 5
RESERVED FOR FUTURE REPORTING
chapter 6
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STAFFING,
COSTS, AND FIELD EQUIPMENT
Introduction
Staffing, Revenues, and Costs
Field Equipment
chapter 6
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STAFFING, COSTS, AND FIELD EQUIPMENT
6.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter discusses the pretreatment program's staffing levels, program costs, payments to OCSD
by permittees, and equipment used by the program.
6.2 STAFFING, REVENUES, AND COSTS
6.2.1 Staffing
The Resource Protection Division (RPD), a part of OCSD's Environmental Services Department
(ESD), includes all the pretreatment program staff. Dedicated pretreatment staff for 2017/18 consists
of 1 Manager, 3 Supervisors, 9 Engineers, 4 Environmental Specialists, 10 Field Inspectors, 3 Field
Technicians, and 7 Administrative Support Personnel for a total of 37 staff members.
6.2.2 Revenues
During FY 2017118 a total of$22,395,137 in revenue payments were made to OCSD by Class I, Class
II, Wastehauler, Special Purpose, and FOG permittees. The following amounts were collected for the
discharge of wastewater, Biochemical Oxygen Demand pollutants, and Suspended Solid pollutants:
Operation and Maintenance (O&M) fees totaled $17,946,981: Supplemental Capacity Facilities
Capacity Charge (SCFCC) fees totaled $3,425,836: and Wastehauler User Fees totaled $730,585.
Permit fees in the amount of$291,735 were collected, and over $140,348.80 in noncompliance fees
and penalties were assessed, including interest and processing fees. Due to OCSD's Financial
Management Division's accounting practices, the O&M and SCFCC fees represent the prior fiscal
year, FY 2016/17.
The revenue collected offsets a portion of OCSD's treatment costs and the $6,044,009 needed to
administer the pretreatment program, including labor, supplies, equipment, and other overhead.
These costs are associated with issuing permits, sampling, inspections, and laboratory analyses.
6.2.3 Program Costs
Overall pretreatment program implementation costs (including overtime) during the fiscal year
decreased 6.9% over the preceding year and show a 17% decrease from the program costs of five
years ago. The cost per labor hour over the past five years has decreased 9.2%, which is an average
1.8% per year decrease. A comparison of pretreatment program costs for the past five years is shown
in Table 6.1.
6.1
TABLE 6.1 Summary of Total Costs and Total Labor Hours for the Pretreatment Program,
Fiscal Years 2013-18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Cost Per
Fiscal Year Total Cost Labor Hours Labor Hour
2013-14 $7,283,573 76,202 $95.58
2014-15 $7,923,908 71,111 $111.43
2015-16 $7,536,949 72,439 $104.05
2016-17 $6,488,868 69,046 $93.98
2017-18 $6,044,009 69,606 $86.83
6.3 FIELD EQUIPMENT
6.3.1 Equipment Inventory
An inventory of major equipment used by the OCSD inspection staff for the Resource Protection
Division is shown in Table 6.2. Thirteen field staff, each utilizing trucks and modem sampling
equipment, maintain a high degree of visibility in the industrial community.
TABLE 6.2 Current Inventory of Major Equipment for the Pretreatment Program,
Fiscal Year 2017.18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Description Quantity
Vehicles 13
Equipment
Cellular Phones 13
Composite Samplers, General Use 66
Composite Samplers, Special Purpose 16
Flow Meters, Portable 0
pH Meters, Portable 13
Gas Meters 14
6.2
chapter 7
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STATUS
Introduction
Public Participation
Wastehauler Program
Inspection and Sampling
Quality Assurance and Quality Control Activities
Total Toxic Organics Waiver Program
Special Purpose Discharge Permit Program
Self-Monitoring Program
Industrial Operations and Maintenance Improvement Program
Significant Changes in Operating the Pretreatment Program
chapter
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM STATUS
7.1 INTRODUCTION
The Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)administers several different program elements designed
to meet the goal of controlling discharges from industrial and non-industrial sources. These have a direct
influence on OCSD's ability to meet ocean discharge, biosolids reuse, and water reclamation
requirements. This chapter outlines those program elements designed to enforce and enhance the
federally approved Pretreatment Program, and include industrial discharger public participation,
wastehauler monitoring, industrial inspection and sampling,quality assurance/quality control,total toxic
organic(TTOs)waivers,special purpose discharge pemtits,self-monitoring,and industrial operations and
maintenance improvement.
7.2 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
A provision of 40 CFR 403.8 is to comply with the public participation requirements of 40 CFR Part 25 in
the enforcement of National Pretreatment Standards. These procedures shall include provision for at
least annual public notification in a newspaper(s)of general circulation that provides meaningful public
notice within the jurisdiclion(s)served by OCSD,of Industrial Users which,at anytime during the previous
12 months, were in significant noncompliance with applicable pretreatment requirements. This public
notice is shown in Appendix E.
7.3 WASTEHAULER PROGRAM
OCSD operates a dedicated discharge station at Reclamation Plant No. 1 for the disposal of septage,
chemical toilets,brine,cesspool and non-industrial Food Service Establishment grease(FSE)interceptor
wastes collected by independent wastehaulers. The discharges are transferred via a major interplant
sewer to Treatment Plant No. 2 for treatment. OCSD Treatment Plant No. 2 has a back-up discharge
station to be used during Plant No. 1 service interruptions. The following sections provide the status of
wastehauler permitting,discharges and monitoring conducted during FY 2017/18. Values provided in the
tables are derived primarily from manifests provided by the wastehauler companies.
7.3.1 Wastehauler Permitting
Before a liquid waste pumper can obtain a Wastehauler Permit from OCSD,the wastehauling company
must register with the Orange County Health Care Agency(OCHCA)and have all pumper trucks intended
for discharge at OCSD inspected by OCSD staff. Numerical decals issued by both OCHCA and OCSD
are affixed to all permitted pumper trucks.These decals aid in the identification of authorized pumpers.
Permits include rules for use of the wastehauler station,with enforcement for violations. Wastehaulers
must conduct their business using methods to reduce or eliminate odors. During FY 2017118, 41
wastehauler companies were under permit with OCSD, with a total of 132 trucks.
7.3.2 Wastehauler Discharges
During the past fiscal year,12.1 million gallons(MG)ofwaste was discharged by permitted wastehaulers
at the OCSD Wastehauler Station. The volume of waste accepted at the station was 33%lower than the
volume received during FY 2016/17. The number of loads received decreased by 43%from FY 2016/17.
As of January 18,2016,OCSD started using a new pretreatment software and database(RACS),which
7.1
allows for more accurate tracking and calculation of discharged volumes. The reported volume for FY
2015/16 through FY 2017/18 takes into account the self-reported volumes, instead of the maximum
capacity volumes reported in previous years,which assumed all received tanks were full. Wastehauler
discharge data for the last five years is summarized in Table 7.1.
TABLE 7.1 Summary of Wastehauler Loads and Volume Discharged into Plant No. 1
Disposal Station, Fiscal Years 2013-2018
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Loads Volume Waste Received
Fiscal Year Delivered Millions of Gallons
2013-14 6,331 12.9
2014-15 6,972 14.8
2015-16 7,472 14.2'
2016-17 8,465 18.1'
2017-18 4,844 12.1'
' Volume rewited is based on Wastehauler self-repored volumes.
Wastehauler loads are classified into five types of waste:Brine,cesspool,chemical toilets,non-industrial
Food Service Establishment(FSE)grease interceptor waste(i.e.restaurant grease trap waste),and septic
tanks. The total volumes and number of loads for each type of waste are summarized in Table 7.2.
TABLE 7.2 Summary of Wastehauler Load Types Discharged into Plant No. 1
Disposal Station, Fiscal Year 2017/18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Loads Waste Received in Percent of
Load Type Delivered Millions of Gallons Waste Received
Brine 13 <0.1 <1
Cesspool 132 0.2 2
Chemical Toilet 3,472 4.3 35
Food Service Establishment 3,100 5.8 48
(FSE)Grease
Septic Tank 1,241 1.8 15
Total All Types 7,968 12.1 100
During the paslfiscal year,5.8 million gallons of FSE grease was discharged by permitted wastehaulers at
OCSD's Wastehauler Station. This represents a 38%decrease from the volume of grease discharged
during FY 2016/17. The five-year trend for grease is presented in Table 7.3.
7.2
TABLE 7.3 Summary of Wastehauler Grease Wastewater Loads into OCSD's Disposal
Station, Fiscal Years 2013-2018
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year Loads Delivered Millions of Gallons
2013-14 1,589 5.5
2014-15 2,584 7.9
2015-16 2,565 7.21
2016-17 3,668 9.33
2017-18 3,100 5.8
7.3.3 Wastehauler Monitoring
Random sampling of wastehauler loads is conducted to verify compliance with OCSD discharge limits.
During FY 2017/18,the contents of 707 wastehauler trucks(8.9%of all loads received)were sampled and
4,953 metal analyses were performed.The results of the sampling included 37 metal violations in 24loads
that originated from either domestic sources or grease hauling. This represents a 3.3%violation rate of
the total samples taken and analyzed. The violations included ten copper, one lead, and fifteen zinc
concentration exceedances. Some of the actions taken by OCSD as a response to these violations
included generator verifications and inspections,investigations,Notice of Violation letters,and compliance
meetings.
7.4 INSPECTION AND SAMPLING
OCSD schedules sampling and inspection of each Class 1 industry quarterly,and samples select Class II
industries periodically. Permittees are sampled for metals, cyanide, organics, pH, oil and grease,
biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and suspended solids (SS). Inspections are conducted before
and/or after each 24-hour composite sampling event, at the time of collecting a grab sample, and to
determine compliance with other provisions of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations(Ordinance).
7.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL ACTIVITIES
7.5.1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) Program Tasks
The objective of the QA/QC program is to ensure that all field sampling and monitoring is accurate and
performed in accordance with Resource Protection Division's adopted policies and procedures. The
QA/QC program includes the following components:
Eauipment Blank — Composite samples of deionized water are collected monthly to evaluate the
cleaning procedures and storage of automatic sampling equipment.
Archive Sample Check—Archived heavy metal samples are analyzed monthly,several months after
collection,to evaluate the effects of sample storage conditions and whether those conditions impose
analyte degradation or contamination.
Sample Collection Check — Duplicate composite samples are collected quarterly to evaluate the
precision of the sample collection and preservation methods.
7.3
Trio Blank Evaluation —Samples made up of reagent water are collected to measure the potential
contamination of EPA Method 624 samples during transport and storage.
Sample Collection and Inspection Audit — Periodic reviews are conducted to assure that the
Inspectors conform to existing guidelines for inspection and sample collection, and that existing
procedures continue to ensure representative data. Document reviews are completed to assess
Inspector overall performance.
During FY 2017/18,72 composite samples were collected for equipment blank verification,48 archived
samples were analyzed for comparison against previous analytical results, 40 samples were collected
from industrial discharges to audit collection methods,and 12 trip blank samples were analyzed to verify
the effectiveness of the transportation and storage methods of volatile organic compound samples. The
test results for QA/QC samples collected are detailed in Appendix I. The overall results show that the
procedures and their implementation for the collection of field samples are adequate to assure sample
quality and consistency.
Calculation Methods
Equipment blank sampling is performed to find any concentration above the reporting limit (RL). Any
delectable amount is considered an indicator of possible contamination in the deionized water supply,
detergent,containers,storage,or other sources.The numberoftimes a metal is detected above the RL is
tracked.
Methods for calculating deviations were refined beginning with data generated during 2005 to be more
consistent with accepted laboratory standards for quality control.The prior use of Pretreatment Standards
for Existing Sources(PSES)discharge limits to calculate percent deviations for duplicate samples has
been replaced with the relative percent difference (RPD) formula found in Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater(hereafter Standard Methods),22"d Edition, Part 1020 B,Section
12, Subsection f,entitled"Duplicate sample' (pg. 1-11).
Precision among duplicate samples is important for the archive samples and sample collection checks.
The following metrics were determined based on the nature of the samples normally collected and the
variables with matrix effects anticipated. The precision of low-level duplicates,with concentrations less
than 20 times the RL is i 25% RPD. The precision of high-level duplicates,with concentrations greater
than 20 times the RL, is t 20% RPD. These guidelines are used to present and calculate the archive
sample data in the tables below. If the average of the two duplicate samples is greater than 20 times the
RL, then the more restrictive limit of 20% is used to evaluate precision. Additionally, per Standard
Methods,22"d Edition, Part 1020B,Section 8,values where the average is below five(5)times the RL are
not used for RPD calculation.
A study conducted in 2009, including a review of relevant literature and OCSD data, has confirmed that
silver is relatively unstable under standard preservation and storage conditions, and cannot be used to
evaluate precision and accuracy with the other metals listed below in archive samples. Consequently,
silver has been removed from the list of metals used to evaluate precision and accuracy.
The current reporting limits(RLs)used by OCSD's laboratory during FY 2017/18 are listed below. These
reporting limits are used in calculations in tables where RLs appear.
7.4
Cadmium Chromium Copper Nickel Lead Zinc
RL(mg/L) 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
7.5.2 QA/QC Sampling Results
Evaluation of Equipment Blank Sampling Results
To check for contamination of sampler and field equipment, two composite samples are collected each
quarter using clean, randomly chosen automatic samplers. The two samplers are set at the Source
Control Inspection Group's technician room to collect composite samples from a deionized water supply
placed in the samplers 24 bottles. The QA/QC samples are composited and preserved in the same
manner as compliance samples collected at permitted facilities. Each composite is split into three equal
volumes, preserved, submitted to, and analyzed individually by OCSD's laboratory for heavy metal
constituents.
The results of this study are summarized in Table 7.4.The statistics presented below show that 91%of
the analyses (393 of the 432 analyses)are at or below the heavy metal constituents RL.
TABLE 7.4 Equipment Blank Sampling Results, Fiscal Year 2017118
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Analyses at or Below Analyses Above
Reporting Limit Reporting Limits Total Avg.
Constituent RL(mg/L) No.of Analyses Percentage No.of Analyses Deviation
Cadmium 0.1 72 100 0 0.000
Chromium 0.02 72 100 0 0.000
Copper 0.02 69 96 3 0.002
Nickel 0.02 72 100 0 0.000
Lead 0.02 72 100 0 0.000
Zinc 0.02 36 50 36 0.015
Summaries 393 91 1 39 0.003
Half of the Zinc samples had results above the RL. Of the results above the RL, all were just slightly
above the RL.Zinc and Copper are common contaminants and are present in dust; OCSD continues to
review equipment maintenance and storage procedures to try to minimize this low concentration
contamination.
Evaluation of Archived Samples
Archived samples are submitted to OCSD's laboratory to evaluate the effects of sample splitting and
storage techniques. The results of the archive sample analyses are compared with the original sample
results and the relative percent difference(RPD)is calculated for each metal. Results at or below the RL
are calculated as equal to the RL.
7.5
Statistics on the archived samples and relative percent differences(RPD)are summarized in Table 7.5.Of
the 288 comparisons performed on 96 samples(48 archived samples and 48 original samples),98.6%of
the results were within the acceptable RPD.
TABLE 7.5 QA/QC Evaluation of Archived Samples, Fiscal Year 2017118
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Comparisons Comparisons Percent
Within outside within Average
Constituent Acceptable RPD Acceptable RPD Acceptable RPD RPD(%)
Cadmium 48 0 100 0
Chromium 48 0 100 1
Copper 47 1 98 6
Nickel 48 0 100 3
Lead 48 0 100 2
Zinc 45 3 94 19
Summaries 284 4 98.6 5
The incidents of comparisons outside acceptable RPDs are believed to originate from sample splitting
and/or preservation errors.
A review of archive sample handling procedures took place during FY 2016117,and a new procedure for
storing sample archives was implemented on July 1, 2016. OCSD's Laboratory is planning to perform
analysis to study sample preservation and potential degradation or leaching.
Sample Collection Checks
Two composite samples are collected each quarter to verify the precision of the sample collection
methods. In this study,two automatic samplers are installed adjacent to each other at a single industrial
sample point to collect one composite sample from each sampler. Each composite sample is split into ten
duplicate portions. Five duplicates from each sampler are analyzed by OCSD's laboratory for heavy
metals and five are analyzed for total suspended solids(TSS).
The results for each constituent are evaluated by calculafing the relative percent difference(RPD)for each
group of metals. Values that exceed the accepted deviations for metals and TSS are investigated, and
where causes are identified, corrective actions are taken. This comparison is used to confirm that the
sample location is appropriate,that the samplers are maintained and are functioning properly, and that
sample-splitting techniques are effective.
The statistics on the collection check samples and the sampler average deviations are summarized in
Table 7.6. The comparisons show acceptable agreement both among the samples within the sampler and
between samplers at the same site.
7.6
TABLE 7.6 QA/QC Collection Check Samples and Sampler Average Deviations, Fiscal Year
2017/18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Average Deviations
Qtr. Location Cadmium Chromium Copper Nickel Lead zl
1 SamplerA 0.00 0.00 Too 0.00 0,00 0.02 1
Sampler 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 1
Site RPD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.1 it
2 SamplerA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8
Sampler 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Too 0.00 7
Site RPD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1
3 SamplerA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Sampler 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Site RPD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42
4 SamplerA 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.12 8.0
Sampler 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.1 9.0
Site RPD 0.00 13.81 4.8 6.5 10.4 9.5 4
Avg. Site RPD 0.00 0.00 1.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.5
All results are in units of sampler average deviation. TSS=total suspended solids
The variances between samples at the same site were all low and demonstrate good sample splitting.
Fourth quarter TSS showed a high RPD between the two samplers collecting samples from the same site.
Collection check procedures are currently being evaluated and staff will be notified of any changes if
necessary.
Trio Blank Evaluation for EPA Method 624 Analysis
Inspectors perform this study monthly. Containers prepared with reagent water are obtained from OCSD's
laboratory and carried by inspectors with other samples during their work day.The containers are returned
to the lab and analyzed for volatile organics. Twelve trip blanks were analyzed for volatile organics using
EPAMethod624. Eleven of the twelve result sets were below the reporting limits. For the April trip blank,
there were trace amounts of Acetone.This is likely due to laboratory contamination,as these compounds
are not normally found at the type of industry visited, nor were they found in the industry sample for that
day.
Sample Collection and Inspection Audit
During FY 2017/18,the source control supervisor audited the sample collection and inspection procedures
of individual inspectors. The audit of each inspector was accomplished by document review during
performance evaluations. Opportunities for improvement were discussed with individual inspectors during
their mid-year and annual performance reviews.
7.5.3 Conclusions
The following findings support the general conclusion that the sampling procedures are being followed
and that the samples are representative and free of contamination:
7.7
• Results of the Equipment Blank Evaluation demonstrate that 91% of the equipment blank
samples have concentrations at or below the heavy metal reporting limits. The remaining 9
contained low level Copper and Zinc contamination slightly above the RL.
• Results of the Archive Sample Evaluation demonstrate that 98.6%of the archive samples were
within the acceptable percent deviation range.
• The Sample Collection Check results show good agreement for heavy metals among split
samples for each sampler as well as between samplers at the same site.The sample locations
and sample-splitting methods are adequate to provide representative samples for heavy metals.
• Eleven of twelve EPA Method 624 trip blanks were below reporting limits. The April 2018 trip
blank results had trace amounts for one compound not observed in the industry sample.
• The Sample Collection and Inspection Audit involved a broad review of inspection and sampling
records. The results of the audits were discussed with individual inspectors during their
performance reviews.
7.6 TOTAL TOXIC ORGANICS WAIVER PROGRAM
Permittees subject to Federal Categorical Standards were first notified of OCSD's Total Toxic Organics
(TTOs) Control Program requirements on July 27, 1987. The current TTOs Program is summarized
below:
• Categorical permittees who are required to conduct self-monitoring for Total Toxic Organics
(TTOs) must collect composite samples at least twice a year. In accordance with OCSD's
Wastewater Discharge Regulations,the composite sample typically consists of a minimum of four
(4)grab samples where the concentration of a composite sample is obtained by analyzing the
grab samples and compositing the results mathematically.
• Permitteeswho have notshown detectable levelsof TTOs based on their wastewater discharge
data for at least one year are eligible to waive the self-monitoring requirement if they can certify
that TTOs are not used or present in the industrial wastewater discharge at their facility. The
wastewater discharge data used in evaluating eligibility for this waiver includes data for samples
obtained by OCSD during routine monitoring and the self-monitoring results obtained by the
permittee. The evaluation of wastewater discharge to determine the permittees that are eligible
for this waiver is conducted in December and June of each year. See Table 7.7 for those
permittees that have successfully applied for a waiver. To be eligible for a waiver,the permittee
must satisfy all of the following:
• Permittee must demonstrate sampling results with TTO concentrations less than or equal
to 0.049 mg/L for the monitoring period being considered.
• Permit must have an initial permit issue date that is prior to the start of the baseline
monitoring being considered.
• Submission of an acceptable Toxic Organic Management Plan (TOMP).
• Subsequently, permittees who have a TTOs self-monitoring waiver renew their Certification of
Non-Use of TTOs semi-annually during this period;otherwise,the waiver is cancelled. Issuance
of a waiver does not constitute elimination of the self-monitoring requirement from the permit but
merely a temporary discontinuance or suspension of the requirement.
7.8
• The self-monitoring requirement waiver for any permittee is cancelled if sampling results from the
permittee's self-monitoring or OCSD's sampling demonstrate TTO concentrations above the
0.049 mg/L threshold.For these cases,the requirement to conduct self-monitoring at least twice a
year is immediately reinstated.
• Newly permitted categorical users required to self-monitor will not be allowed to waive the self-
monitoring requirement until meeting TTO reporting and waiver requirements for at least a year.
Table 7.7 Permittees with TTOs Waivers,July 1,2017-June 30,2018
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)Resource Protection Division (RPD)
Permit No. Facility Name Federal Categories
1-531422 A&G Electropolish Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021088 A& R Powder Coating, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011138 Accurate Circuit Engineering Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011115 Active Plating, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021389 Advance Tech Plating, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-031110 All Metals Processing of O.C., Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011073 Allied Electronics Services, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011036 Alloy Tech Electropolishing, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021249 American Circuit Technology,Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521798 Andres Technical Plating Metal Finishing PSNS
1-600295 AnoChem Coatings Metal Finishing PSNS
1-511389 Anodyne, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011155 Anomil Ent. Dba Danco Metal Surfacing Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021192 ARO Service Metal Finishing PSNS
1-031137 Arrowhead Products Corporation Metal Finishing PSNS
1-571295 Astech Engineered Products, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-071037 Aviation Equipment Processing Metal Finishing PSNS
1-031094 Basic Electronics, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521824 Beckman Coulter, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-511370 Beo-Mag Plating Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021213 Black Oxide Industries, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-111018 Boeing Company(Graham) Metal Finishing PSNS
Metal Finishing PSES&PSNS and
1-021226 Bristol Industries Nonferrous Metals Forming and
Metal Powders PSNS
1-521770 Burlington Engineering, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021062 Cadillac Plating, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-111089 Cal-Aurum Industries, Inc. Electroplating PSES and Metal
Finishing PSNS
1-521814 Cartel Electronics Metal Finishing PSNS
1-511076 CD Video, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021189 Central Powder Coating Metal Finishing PSNS
7.9
Table 7.7 Permittees with TTOs Waivers,July 1,2027-June 30,2018
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)Resource Protection Division(RPD)
Permit No. Facility Name Federal Categories
Metal Finishing PSNS and
1-511381 Cherry Aerospace Nonferrous Metals Forming and
Metal Powders PSES&PSNS
1-511414 Chromadora, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521821 Circuit Technology,Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021133 Cirtech, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-111129 Coastto Coast Circuits,Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-531436 Coastline Metal Finishing Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021290 Continuous Coating Corporation Coil Coating PSNS and Metal
Finishing PSNS
1-021289 Crest Coating, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021297 Custom Enamelers, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021379 Data Aire, Inc.#2 Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011142 Data Electronic Services, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521761 Data Solder, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021325 Dunham Metal Processing Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011064 EFT Fast Quality Service, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021158 Electro Metal Finishing Corporation Metal Finishing PSNS
1-071162 Electrolurgy, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021336 Electron Plating III, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021337 Electronic Precision Specialties, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521855 Exceiio Circuits Manufacturing Corp. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011068 Fabrication Concepts Corporation Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021121 Fineline Circuits&Technology, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-600149 Gemtech Coatings Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021352 Gomtech Electronics,Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021286 Harbor Truck Bodies, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521790 Hi Tech Solder Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021185 Hightower Plating& Manufacturing Co. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021041 Ideal Anodizing, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521756 Ikon Powder Coating, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-031106 Imperial Plating Metal Finishing PSNS
1-600243 Integral Aerospace, LLC Metal Finishing PSNS
1-571328 Irvine Sensors Corporation Electrical and Electronic
Components PSNS
1-571292 Jazz Semiconductor Electrical and Electronic
Components PSNS
1-511407 JD Processing, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021171 Kenlen Specialities, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021428 Kryler Corporation Electroplating PSES and Metal
Finishing PSNS
7.10
Table 7.7 Permittees with TTOs Waivers,July 1,2027-June 30,2018
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)Resource Protection Division (RPD)
Permit No. Facility Name Federal Categories
1-511361 LM Chrome Corporation Metal Finishing PSNS
1-031049 Logi Graphics, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-111007 M.S. Bellows Metal Finishing PSNS
1-531391 Magnetic Metals Corporation Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011046 Markland Manufacturing, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021153 Micrometals, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521811 Murrietta Circuits Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521772 Neutronic Stamping and Plating Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521801 Nobel Biocare USA,LLC Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021520 Omni Metal Finishing,Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021535 Orange County Plating Co.,Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021070 Pacific Image Technology,Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-141002 Parker Hannifin Corporation Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521783 Patio and Door Outlet, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521805 Performance Powder, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011262 Pioneer Circuits,Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521852 Platinum Surface Coating,Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-600167 PowderCoat Services, LLC-Building E Metal Finishing PSNS
1-600168 PowderCoat Services, LLC-Buildingl Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011265 Precious Metals Plating Co., Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521809 Precision Anodizing& Plating, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011008 Precision Circuits West,Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-061138 Railmakers, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011013 RBC Transport Dynamics Corp. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-511376 Reid Metal Finishing Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021187 Rigiflex Technology, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021033 Roto-Die Company, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-061008 Sanmina Corporation (Airway) Metal Finishing PSNS
1-061009 Sanmina Corporation (Redhill) Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021016 Santana Services Metal Finishing PSNS
1-031311 Scientific Spray Finishes,Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-031341 Soldermask, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011069 South Coast Circuits, Inc. (Bldg 3500 A) Metal Finishing PSNS
1-011030 South Coast Circuits, Inc. (Bldg 3506 A) Metal Finishing PSNS
1-511365 South Coast Circuits, Inc. (Bldg 3512 A) Metal Finishing PSNS
1-013054 South Coast Circuits, Inc. (Bldg 3524 A) Metal Finishing PSNS
Metal Finishing PSNS and
1-011310 SPS Technologies Nonferrous Metals Forming and
Metal Powders PSES
1-021672 Stainless Micro-Polish, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
7.11
Table 7.7 Permittees with TTOs Waivers,July 1,2027-June 30,2018
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)Resource Protection Division(RPD)
Permit No. Facility Name Federal Categories
1-531425 Star Powder Coating, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021664 Statek Corporation (Main) Electrical and Electronic
Components PSES
1-521777 Statek Corporation(Orange Grove) Electrical and Electronic
Components PSNS
1-600012 Summit Interconnect, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-600060 Summit Interconnect, Inc.,Orange Division Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021090 Superior Plating Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021403 Superior Processing Metal Finishing PSNS
1-031012 Tayco Engineering, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-571309 TC Cosmotronic, Inc., DBA Cosmotronic Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021082 Techplate, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021282 Thermal-Vac Technology, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-111132 Tiodize Company, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021202 Transline Technology, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-511403 Triumph Processing-Embee Div(Plate) Electroplating PSES
Metal Finishing PSNS
1-511402 Triumph Processing- Embee Div. (Anodize) Electroplating PSES
Metal Finishing PSNS
1-141163 Tropitone Furniture Co., Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-511366 TTM Technologies North America, U.C. Metal Finishing PSNS
(Croddy)
1-511359 TTM Technologies North America, U.C. Metal Finishing PSNS
(Harbor)
1-021703 Ultra-Pure Metal Finishing,Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521836 Universal Molding Co. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-021166 Veeco Electro Fab, Inc. Metal Finishing PSNS
1-521859 Viasystems Technologies Corporation, LLC Metal Finishing PSNS
1-031035 Winonics(Brea) Metal Finishing PSNS
7.7 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMIT PROGRAM
A Special Purpose Discharge Permit(SPDP)is issued by OCSD for water and wastewater discharges to
the sewerage system when no alternative discharge point exists other than the sewer system and/or
considered alternate discharge methods pose an environmental impact or threat.
Wastewater discharges may include: 1)temporary facilities and projects such as groundwater cleanup
and construction dewatering;2)short-term or one-time water and wastewater discharges;3)emergency
discharges from facilities that have no other industrial or permitted discharge point;or 4)surface run-off
from areas associated with an industrial or commercial facility.
7.12
7.7.1 Metrics and Trends
During FY 2017118, there were twelve new SPDPs issued, four voided SPDPs, and two SPDPs that
were not renewed by the permittee. During the fiscal year, there were 60 active SPDPs, an increase
from the previous fiscal year. Active SPDPs are renewed on a biannual basis.
The majority of the new SPDPs issued during FY 2017/18 were for short-tenn construction dewatering
activities(i.e.,typically less than a year). Formerly,the most common special purpose permitted facilities
were gasoline service stations that required remedialion of contaminated groundwater. Other dischargers
affected include mobile cleaners,water features(e.g.pools),water-well purging disinfection,subsurface
parking structure dewatering, etc.
OCSD staff continues to work with outside agencies such as the RWQCB-SAR8,OCHCA,and the cities
within Orange County to both coordinate and offer guidance on the SPDP issuance process and OCSD's
Wastewater Discharge Regulations(Ordinance).
7.7.2 SPDP Program Enforcement
For FY 2017118,the Irvine Company Apartment Communities' (ICAC) had a copper violation on May
8, 2018. A Notice of Violation with resampling requirement was issued to ICAC on June 11,2018.
The resampling showed compliance. ICAC reported that the violation most likely came again from the
mobile car washing activities in the parking structure. ICAC had previously required the mobile car
wash company to contain and dispose all washwater offsite. This time, ICAC notified the car wash
operator that ICAC will hold them responsible for any fines or liability that may arise from the recurring
violations. Should another violation occur, OCSD will pursue escalated enforcement action.
7.7.3 SPDP Regulatory Program
OCSD staff minimizes SPDP impacts to OCSD Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2.
by diverting non-compatible discharges from Reclamation Plant 1 to Treatment Plant 2; coordinating
more closely with Operations, Engineering and Safety on significant one-time discharges; requiring
pretreatment for projects which may encounter known contaminated underground plumes; requiring
best management practices for small nuisance dischargers; and requiring significant construction
dewatering dischargers to stop discharging during a rain/storm event.
7.8 SELF-MONITORING PROGRAM
OCSD operates an extensive self-monitoring program,which is an integral part of the Resource Protection
Division's monitoring and enforcement programs. OCSD's self-monitoring program exceeds the minimum
requirements of 40 CFR 403. To obtain a broad perspective of a permittee's discharge quality and
adequately determine their compliance status,OCSD takes a proactive approach to self-monitoring(per
EPA recommendation) by requiring frequent sampling in most cases. OCSD determined that sampling
quarterly or semi-annually is an effective method to generate sufficient data to make a fair determination
of a permitee's compliance status; and balance the need for data against the related costs incurred by
permittees. In addition,these sampling frequencies preclude permittees from being unduly classified as
SNC for isolated process upsets.
OCSD's self-monitoring program is largely automated with self-monitoring results submitted on OCSD's
standardized Self-Monitoring Report (SMR)forms. These forms are computer-generated with unique
SMR numbers that allow tracking and automatic generation of reminders, late and incomplete notices,
violation notices with resample forms, and SNC notices. This tracking system has enabled OCSD to
ensure that permittees comply with self-monitoring requirements.
7.13
In January 2016,OCSD launched its new permitting,inspection,and monitoring software,which includes
an automated online self-monitoring entry program component called GovOnline. However,GovOnline is
currently not functional and OCSD has been working with the vendor to fix the technical issues.
7.9 INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
To remains vital part of the community, help businesses and industries in OCSD's service area maintain
compliance, and to enable OCSD to attain its environmental goals, OCSD established an Industrial
Operations and Maintenance Improvement Program. The program serves as both a resource for industry
and a forum for discussing methods to carry out environmental requirements. The program consists of
outreach and education,which includes publications addressing pretreatment program elements such as
permitting,compliance and pollution prevention;OCSD staff presence at educational events and fairs;and
OCSD-sponsored training opportunities.
Industrial Operations and Maintenance Improvement Proaram
The ongoing trend in industrial permittee discharge violations have shown that most cases are due to
inadequate operations and maintenance of industry's pretreatment systems as well as industrial operator
error. This was recognized years ago, when the U.S. EPA audit findings of 1998 recommended that
OCSD develop and implement an industrial operations and improvement program. In 1999/2000,OCSD
developed a plan that included outreach and operator training, and enforcement of requirements for
operator and operations and maintenance practices which is still in effect today.
In 2018,OCSD conducted an advanced training course for industrial wastewater treatment(pretreatment)
operators currently employed by facilities holding a Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit. The course
was conducted by an engineering services company(selected via bid process for a five-year contract in
2014). OCSD provided this training, free of charge, to assist permittees to obtain and retain a qualified
pretreatment operator and to reduce or eliminate noncompliance due to operation and maintenance
and/or operator problems. The training course consisted of two 4.5-hour classes and a follow-up
wastewater audit at the operator facility to ensure proper implementation of operation and maintenance
practices. Those class participants that attended both classes, passed the exam and quizzes, and
successfully fulfilled the audit requirements, will receive Certificates of Completion.
7.10 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN OPERATING THE PRETREATMENT PROGRAM
There were no significant changes to the OCSD Pretreatment Program during FY 2017/18.
7.14
chapter 8
INTERACTION WITH OTHER AGENCIES
Introduction
Los Angeles Sanitation District Nos. 18 and 19 Flow Accommodation
Agreement
Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD)
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA)
Chapter 8
INTERACTION WITH OTHER AGENCIES
8.1 INTRODUCTION
The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) has entered into agreements and has developed
Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) with Los Angeles County Sanitation District (LACSD) Nos. 18
and 19, Irvine Ranch Water District(IRWD), and the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority(SAWPA)for
accepting their wastewater flows and implementing source control discharge, inspection, and enforcement
requirements. Therefore, this chapter is divided into three sections below, the first section presents
information on LACSD for FY 2017/18, the second section presents information on IRWD for FY 2017/18,
and the third on SAWPA for FY 2017/18.
8.2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOS. 18 AND 19 FLOW
ACCOMMODATION AGREEMENT
In 1960, Los Angeles County Sanitation District Nos. 18 and 19 (LACSD) and County Sanitation District
No. 3 of Orange County, predecessor to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), entered into a flow
accommodation agreement by which each District agreed to receive wastewater from the other District,
where the wastewater originated in one District's service area and discharged into the other District's
sewerage system. The geographic areas subject to the agreement are located along the Los Angeles
County/Orange County boundary and are characterized by the fact that they are physically isolated from
the sewer system of their respective District's jurisdiction by Coyote Creek. The Districts entered into
subsequent flow accommodation agreements for the 2010-11 and 2011-12 fiscal years. A current
agreement was approved by the Board of Directors of both LACSD and OCSD on July 1,2012.
The flow accommodation agreement is fee-based,focusing primarily on residential parcels and flows. For
the few industrial dischargers, the fees are based on flow, biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen
demand and suspended solids. The originating District is responsible for administering and enforcing its
industrial waste Pretreatment Program for industries in its service area, with terms and conditions of
coordination and information exchange between the Districts.
For this fiscal year, OCSD has no industrial facilities discharging to LACSD. LACSD has four (4) non-
categorical permittees discharging to OCSD:
• Chemetall Oakite Corp.
• Coyle Reproductions, Inc.
• RockTenn CP, LLC
• T. Hasegawa USA Inc.
Permit and sample information for the above companies has been submitted to OCSD.
8.3 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT (IRWD)
IRWD is a California Water District in central Orange County, California, which is served by several
Revenue Zones within the jurisdiction of OCSD and other agencies. The northern and coastal parts of
IRWD are served by OCSD. The pretreatment program in these sections is managed by OCSD. A small
portion of the eastern part of IRWD, called Portola Hills, is currently sewered to Santa Margarita Water
District,a member of the South Orange County Wastewater Authority(SOCWA). SOCWA administers the
pretreatment program for its member agencies.
8.1
On January 1, 2001, the Los Alisos Water District (LAWD) consolidated with IRWD. LAWD owned and
operated a 5.5-millionyallon-per-day (MGD) water recycling plant whose tertiary effluent is used under
permits granted by both Region 8 and Region 9 Water Quality Control Boards. Secondary wastewater
effluent up to 7.5 MGD that is not recycled is discharged to the Aliso Creek Ocean Outfall in Laguna Beach.
IRWD also uses its capacity in the Aliso Creek Ocean Outfall to dispose of brine from the Irvine Desalter
and treated groundwater from its Shallow Groundwater Unit facility. SOCWA administers the pretreatment
program for discharges to the ocean oulfall.
Most of IRWD is in Orange County Sanitation Revenue Zone No. 14,which collects sewage for treatment
at either IRWD's Michelson Water Recycling Plant(MWRP)or OCSD's Reclamation Plant No. 1. Currently,
most of the sewage generated within Revenue Zone No. 14 is treated at MWRP, which is a tertiary
treatment plant with a design capacity of 28 MGD. MWRP's highly treated effluent meets all of the State of
California Title 22 regulations for the reuse of recycled water. Sludge from MWRP is pumped to an OCSD
sewer for treatment and disposal.
8.3.1 IRWD Operating Permit, Regional Board Order 2015-0024
On June 19,2015, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board adopted Order No. R8-2015-
0024, superseding Order No. R8-2007-0003. Monitoring and Reporting Program under Order No. R8-
2015-0024 requires an annual full priority pollutant scan,with quarterly samples analyzed for those
pollutants that were detected in the annual scan. Sludge monitoring is not one of the requirements of the
Order.
IRWD organic priority pollutant analyses for influent, effluent, and sludge are provided following the
narrative. IRWD has scheduled priority pollutant monitoring more frequently than required by permit in
order to provide additional information to OCSD on the quality of wastewater and sludge in Revenue Zone
14. IRWD will continue to monitor the influent, effluent, and sludge quarterly.
8.3.2 IRWD Analytical Reporting
Annually, the discharger shall submit...a summary of analytical results from representative, flow
proportioned, 24-hour composite sampling of the POTW's influent and effluent for those pollutants EPA has
identified under Section 307(a) of the Act.
The collection points for the influent, effluent and sludge samples are as follows:
Influent: Collected at headworks after grit basins.
Effluent: Collected at the end of the chlorine contact basin(CCB), but downstream of where
the CCB effluent and ultraviolet(UV)disinfected effluent are combined,just prior
to entering the recycled water distribution system.
Sludge: Collected at the flow meter vault on the MPS-3 force main prior to ferrous chloride
injection.
The sampling of influent, effluent,and sludge is performed by Regulatory Compliance personnel according
to the following protocol:
1. Grab samples are collected quarterly for influent, effluent, and sludge samples and analyzed for
volatile organic priority pollutants.
2. Composite samples are collected for BNA extractables, inorganic priority pollutants,
pesticides/PCBs,and phenols at each location. This sampling is performed with a Sigma sampler
that collects discrete samples at hourly intervals over a twenty-four-hour period. The discrete
samples are composited according to flow,and aliquots are distributed into the appropriate sample
container. All the samples are collected in glass bottles and distributed into the appropriate glass
8.2
or plastic bottle.
Some samples are refrigerated and shipped on ice to Weck Laboratories in City of Industry,
California for analysis. Weck Labs supplies all containers with the proper preservatives.
The detection limits may vary from quarter to quarter due to matrix interference and sensitivity of
the analytical equipment; however, the results for each quarter are valid for the detection limit
reported. IRWD and its contract laboratories have endeavored to meet or exceed reporting levels
established in permits.
8.3.3 Inorganic Pollutants
General Minerals
Because IRWD is a water recycling 800
agency, MWRP effluent is subject to
general mineral requirements to protect 780
Basin Plan water quality criteria. IRWD - 760
utilizes local groundwater and imported E
water to supply its customer domestic ` 740
water needs, and the quality of the 720
recycled water is based on the quality of ;,
the domestic supply. The current Basin a' 700
Plan standard for the Irvine 680
Groundwater Basin is 910 mg/L Total
Dissolved Solids(TDS), and the current : 660
TDS limit for discharges to recycled o 6do
water reservoirs designated as "Waters
of the State"is 720 mg/L. As a purveyor 6zo
of recycled water, the IRWD goal is to 600
provide high quality water regardless _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
standards applied in the basin and hass
implemented several projects which Figure g.1 MWRP Effluent Total Dissolved Solids(Annual Average)
improve the quality of the domestic Irvine Ranch Water District—Michelson Water Rerycling Plant
water supply, Which results In Orange County Sanitation District
improvement in the quality of recycled
water. In 1991, IRWD prepared the Michelson Influent Wastewater Quality Improvement Plan which
identifies procedures to be followed to produce the highest quality recycled water. An important feature of
the plan was to maximize the delivery of high quality domestic water during the period of greatest recycled
water consumption. In April 2002, IRWD commissioned its Deep Aquifer Treatment System plant, an 8-
MGD membrane filtration plant, to provide additional high quality domestic water for its customers. The
treatment plant removes natural organic matter in the form of color from a low TDS (250 mg/I on average)
deep groundwater source. In January 2007, IRWD commissioned the Irvine Desalter Project-Potable
Treatment Plant (PTP), a 5.5-MGD reverse osmosis plant and in March 2013 commissioned the Wells
21122 Desalter Plant, a 6.3-MGD reverse osmosis plant, to provide high quality domestic water for its
customers. Both desalter plants remove minerals from water in the Irvine Groundwater Basin to provide a
target of 420 mg/L TDS in the final product water. All three treatment plants are designed to operate
continuously, thereby decreasing consumption of high TDS imported water, and improving mineral quality
of the MWRP effluent. IRWD still needs to import some higher TDS water to meet its water supply needs.
The minerals rejected by the reverse osmosis system for the PTP are discharged into the ocean through
the Aliso Creek Ocean Outfall., and for the Wells 21/22 Desalter Plant are discharged to the sewer that
goes to OCSD's Reclamation Plant No. 1. For FY17/18, PTP operation has resulted in a net export of salt
from the Irvine Groundwater Basin of approximately 2,733 tons. For FY17/18, the Wells 21/22 Desalter
has resulted in a net export of salt from the Irvine Groundwater Basin of approximately 1,482 tons.
Additionally, IRWD has completed a Salt Management Plan that identifies management strategies, cost
8.3
estimates for implementing recommended actions and provide recommendations for policies that may be
considered to manage recycled water salt concentrations throughout the District. Those policies addressed
both current and future conditions that take into consideration changing source water conditions during
ongoing drought as well as water conservation practices that can all impact the TDS concentrations of the
sewage treated at MWRP.
The seasonal change in MWRP effluent mineral quality, on a fiscal year annual average, is also shown in
Figure 8.1. The recycled water mineral quality, as expressed by total dissolved solids(TDS),varied by 92
mg/I during 2017/2018. The effect of providing higher quality domestic water can be seen in the gradual
reduction in TDS of the recycled water over the last five years. The slight increase that occurred last fiscal
year(2015/2016) Could have been due to impacts from ongoing water Conservation efforts and increased
TDS concentrations from imported water supplies.
Total Heavy Metals
IRWD has been analyzing the heavy metals on the list of inorganic priority pollutants for the last 34 years
at MWRP. During the 35-year period,the total mass of heavy metals has increased from 5 pounds per day
fibs/day) to the current 37.7 Ibs/day in the influent, a 18.9% decrease over the previous year, and has
increased in the effluent from 2.8 to the current 11.4 pounds per day in 2017/2018, an increase of 20.2%
from the previous fiscal year.
60 Of all the priority pollutant heavy metals, only
two, copper and zinc, were found in 50
significantly greater concentrations than
remaining metals. The sum of mass of copper 40
and zinc represents 89% of heavy metals
found in the influent, and represents 91% of
what is found in the effluent,with zinc being the 3 c IarwE
overall heavy meal contributor. IRWD
analyzes for metals by ICP-MS, which is 20o-
capable of reporting metals in the sub part per
billion range. Figure 8.2 shows the annual 10
mass of total heavy metals in the influent and ErFEUE T
effluent of MWRP. The major contributing 0
heavy metal is zinc. 1983 1998 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018
Figure 8.2 MWRP Influent and Effluent Total Heavy Metals
Irvine Ranch water Dlstrict—Michelson Water Recycling Plant
Orange county Sandation District
8.4
Copper
14 The major sources of copper are domestic
water systems and the printed circuit board
12 industry. Both residential and nonresidential
water plumbing are predominantly copper.
10 Currently, IRWD does not have printed
circuit board manufacturing in the MWRP
sA service area. The major commercial source
E INFLUENT of copper is believed to be radiator repair;
6o however, copper from radiator repair
oactivities is declining since many of the
4a newer radiators are made from aluminum
and plastic. Growth in the area tributary to
2 EFFLUENT MWRP has begun to increase over the last
few years,and the increase in the amount of
0 copper being discharged Could potentially
1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018 be from new copper plumbing.
Figure S.3 MWRP Influent and Effluent Copper
Irvine Ranch Water District-Michelson Water Recycling Plant Figure 8.3 shows that the mass of copper in
Orange County Sanitation District the influent has increased over the 35-year
period from 3.5 to 9.9 Ibs/day during the
2017/2018 fiscal year. The mass of copper entering the treatment plant decreased by 0.4% from the
2016/2017 daily average. The mass of copper in the effluent also decreased by 1.9% from the previous
fiscal year.
Zinc
Zinc is the predominant heavy metal
detected in both the influent and effluent. 30
The major sources of zinc are brass
alloys used in domestic water systems, 25
water and oil based paints used by the
building industry, and in chemicals and 20
coatings used by industry.
Figure 8.4 shows that the mass of zinc in 15a
the influent has increased from 4.6
Ibs/day to 23.7 Ibs/day over 35 years. 10�JINFLUENIThe influent mass of zinc decreased by 8
0.7 Ibs/day or a 3.2°/ decrease from the 5
previous fiscal year. The mass of zinc inEFFLUENT
the effluent has increased from 1 Ibs/day 0
to 9.3 Ibs/day over the last 35 years and
saw an Increase of 1.8 Ibs/day,or 24.8%, 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018
from the previous fiscal year.
Figure 8.0 MWRP Influent and Effluent Zinc
Irvine Ranch Water District—Michelson Water Recycling Plant
orange County Sanitation District
8.3.4 Organic Pollutants
IRWD has been analyzing for organic pollutants on the list of organic priority pollutants at MWRP since
1983. The sampling frequency has increased from once per year to quarterly sampling. Samples are
collected from the influent, effluent, and sludge.
8.5
Figure 8.5 shows the annual mass of zs
total organic pollutants in the influent
and effluent of MWRP. Over the last
35 years, the annual mass of total zo
organic pollutants entering MWRP
has widely varied and has decreased
from a high of 16.82 Ibs/day to the 15 EFFLUENT—j
current 2.7 lbs/day. The mass oftotal >
organic priority pollutants leaving o
MWRP slightly increased from 16.7
Ibs/day in 2016/2017 to 18.1 Ibs/day
this fiscal year. The general increase a
in effluent organic pollutants above 5
influent levels is attributed to an
increase in trihalomethanes and 14
other volatile organic compounds INFLUENT
resulting from final effluent 0
chlorination required to meet 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 zoos 2013 2018
California Title 22 Water Recycling Figure 8.5 MWRP Influent and Effluent Total Toxic Organics
Irvine Ranch Water District—Michelson Water Recycling Plant
Criteria. Orange County Sanitation District
IRWD has completed its 10 MGD
biological nitrogen removal membrane filtration plant expansion at the MWRP and the plant is now
operating within its design capacity. The UV Disinfection system went online November 2015 and the
effluent total toxic organics concentration and mass has been reduced as the concentration of
trihalomethanes and other volatile organic compounds resulting from effluent chlorination has been
reduced.
8.3.5 Report of Upset, Pass-Through and Interference Events
The discharger shall submit annually...a discussion ofupset, interference, orpass-through incidents,ifany,
at the POTW which the discharger knows or suspects were caused by industrial users of the POTW
system...
There were no upsets, interference or pass-through incidents caused by industrial users during the
reporting period.
8.3.6 Discussion of the List of Industrial Users
The discharger shall submit annually...an updated list of the discharger's significant industrial users...
Table 8.1 summarizes those companies in Revenue Zones Nos. 7 and 14 which were under permit and in
business as of June 30,2018. Class I industrial users in Revenue Zone 7 discharge to the IRWD collection
system and are treated at OCSD's treatment plant. Class I industrial users in Revenue Zone 14 discharge
to the IRWD collection system and are treated at MWRP and at OCSD's treatment plant.
8.6
Table 8.1 Class 1 Industries Within Irvine Ranch Water District Service Areas
Permit No. FacilityName Physical Address NAICs Classification Plant
Code
Alliance Medical Pharmaceutical
1-541182 products, Inc. 9342 Jeronimo Rd. (Irvine) 325412 Preparation IRWD
Manufacturing
Anchen Pharmaceutical
1-541180 Pharmaceuticals, 72 Fairbanks(Irvine) 325412 Preparation IRWD
Inc. (Fairbanks) Manufacturing
Anchen Pharmaceutical
1-600359 Pharmaceuticals, 5 Goodyear(Irvine) 325412 Preparation IRWD
Inc. (Goodyear) I Manufacturing
Anchen Pharmaceutical
1-541179 Pharmaceuticals, 9601 Jeronimo Rd. (Irvine) 325412 Preparation IRWD
Inc. (Jeronimo) Manufacturing
Biological Product
1-571332 Avid Bioservices, Inc. 14191 Myford Rd.(Tustin) 325414 (except Diagnostic) IRWD
Manufacturing
B. Braun Medical, Pharmaceutical
1-071054 Inc. (East/Main) 2525 Mcgaw Ave. (Irvine) 325412 Preparation OCSD
Manufacturing
Pharmaceutical
1-600382 B. Braun Medical, 2206 Alton Parkway 325412 Preparation OCSD
Inc. (North/Alton) (Irvine) Manufacturing
Braun Medical, Pharmaceutical
B. Br
1-541183 Inc. aun Medical,
2525 Mcgaw Ave. (Irvine) 325412 Preparation OCSD
Manufacturing
County of Orange 20662 Newport Coast Dr. Biomass Electric
1-141003 OC Waste& (Newport Coast) 221117 Power Generation OCSD
Recycling
Motor Vehicle
1-571316 CP-Carrillo, Inc. 1902 McGaw Ave. (Irvine) 336310 Gasoline Engine and OCSD
Engine Parts
Manufacturing
Electroplating,
1-071162 Electrolurgy, Inc. 1121 Duryea Ave. 332913 Plating, Polishing, OCSD
(IRVINE) Anodizing, and
Coloring
FMH Aerospace Fluid Power Valve
1-571331 Corp DBA FMH 17072 Daimler St. (Irvine) 332912 and Hose Fitting OCSD
Corporation Manufacturing
1-571314 Graphic Packaging 1600 Barranca Pkwy. 322212 Folding Paperboard OCSD
International, Inc. (Irvine) Box Manufacturing
2502 Barranca Pkwy. Ice Cream and
1-541178 Imuraya USA, Inc. (Irvine) 311520 Frozen Dessert OCSD
Manufacturing
8.7
Table 8.1 Class 1 Industries Within Irvine Ranch Water District Service Areas
Permit No. FacilityName Physical Address NAICs Classification Plant
Code
1-571327 Irvine Ranch Water 1221 Edinger Ave. Water Supply and OCSD
(Tustin) zz1310
District Irrigation Systems
Kraft Heinz Mayonnaise,
1-071056 Company(formerly 2450 White Rd. (Irvine) 311941 Dressing, and Other OCSD
Todds,A Division of HJ Prepared Sauce
Heinz,LLC) Manufacturing
Dry Pasta, Dough,
1-071024 Maruchan, Inc. 1902 Deere Ave. (Irvine) 311824 and Flour Mixes OCSD
(Deere) Manufacturing from
Purchased Flour
Dry Pasta, Dough,
1-141015 Maruchan, Inc. 15800 Laguna Canyon Rd. 3118za and Flour Mixes IRWD
(Laguna Cyn) (Irvine) Manufacturing from
Purchased Flour
1-141023 Marukome USA, Inc. 17132 Pullman St. (Irvine) 311991 Perishable Prepared OCSD
Food Manufacturing
14600 Myford Road Other Measuring and
1-600006 Meggitt, Inc. (Irvine) 334519 Controlling Device OCSD
Manufacturing
Analytical Laboratory
1-071038 Newport Corporation 1791 Deere Ave. (Irvine) 334516 Instrument OCSD
Manufacturing
1-141018 O.C.Waste& 20661 Newport Coast 562910 Remediation Services OCSD
Recycling Drive(Newport Beach)
1-141012 Oakley, Inc. 1 Icon (Foothill Ranch) 339115 Ophthalmic Goods IRWD
Manufacturing
Parker Hannifin Fluid Power Valve
1-141002 Corporation 14300 Alton Pkwy. (Irvine) 332912 and Hose Fitting IRWD
Manufacturing
1-071235 Prudential Overall 16901 Aston St. (Irvine) 812332 Industrial Launderers OCSD
Supply
1-571303 Rayne Dealership 17835 Sky Park Cir. 454390 Other Direct Selling OCSD
Corporation (Irvine) Establishments
1-071240 Royalty Carpet Mills,Inc. 17352 Darien Ave. (Irvine) 314110 Carpet and Rug Mills OCSD
Bolt, Nut, Screw,
1-600297 Shur-Lok Company 2541 White Road (Irvine) 332722 Rivet, and Washer OCSD
Manufacturing
1-071158 St. John Knits, Inc. 17422 Darien Ave. (Irvine) 313310 Textile and Fabric OCSD
Finishing Mills
1-571309 TC Cosmotronic, 16721 Noyes Ave. (Irvine) 334412 Bare Printed Circuit OCSD
Inc., DBA Board Manufacturing
8.8
Table 8.1 Class 1 Industries Within Irvine Ranch Water District service Areas
Permit No. FacilityName Physical Address NAICs Classification Plant
Code
osmotronic
Pharmaceutical
Teva Parenteral
1-141007 Medicines, Inc. 19 Hughes (Irvine) 325412 Preparation IRWD
Manufacturing
Tropitone Furniture Metal Household
1-141163 Co., Inc. 5 Marconi (Irvine) 337124 Furniture IRWD
Manufacturing
Vit-Best Nutrition, Medicinal and
1-600010 2832 Dow Ave. (Tustin) 32U11 Botanical IRWD
Inc. Manufacturing
8.3.7 Discussion of Industrial User Compliance Status
The discharger shall submit annually...a list or table characterizing the industrial compliance status of each
s1D...
The compliance status of each noncompliant SIU is shown in OCSD's Pretreatment Program Annual
Report.
8.3.8 Summary of SIU Compliance
The District shall submit annually...a compliance summary table...
A summary of compliance is shown in OCSD's Pretreatment Program Annual Report.
8.3.9 Discussion of Significant Changes in the Pretreatment Program
The District shall submit annually...a short description of any significant changes in operating the
pretreatment program which differ from the previous year...
There were no significant changes in operating the pretreatment program between the 2016/2017 and
2017/2018 fiscal years.
8.3.10 Pretreatment Program Costs
The District shall submit annually...a summary of the annual pretreatment budget and the pretreatment
equipment purchases...
A financial summary of IRWD's pretreatment program is shown in Table 8.2. All of the expenses shown in
Table 8.2 are related to the operation of IRWD's pretreatment program by IRWD staff. All expenses
incurred by IRWD under the Memorandum of Understanding between IRWD and OCSD are summarized
by OCSD.
8.9
Table ll Summary of Irvine Ranch Water District Pretreatment Program Costs
2017.2018 and 2016.2017
Orange County Sanitation District/IRWD
2017-2018 2016-2017
Protect Description
No. Labor Labor
3093 Quarterly PP $3,140 $8,559
3094 Baseline PP $285 $7,967
3095 PP Surveillance $2,294 $9,003
L096 Compat.Surveillance $8,528 $2,882
Industry.Info.Collection $85,777 $63,455
Eval Data/Rpts. $16,163 $3,720
OCSD/SOCWA $271 $1,606
Total E716,458 $97,192
IRWD records expenses based on project numbers which represent specific activities or groups of related
activities. During fiscal year 2017/2018, IRWD spent $116,458 on the operation of its pretreatment
program, which is an increase of$19,266 from the previous year.
8.3.11 Equipment Purchases for FY 2017/2018
IRWD maintained its existing equipment inventory as shown in Table 8.3
Table 8.3 Summary of Irvine Ranch Water District Pretreatment Equipment, Fiscal Year
2017.2018
Orange County Sanitation DistrictI RWD
Quantity I Description
1 Ford F250
1 Sigma Ultrasonic Flowmeters with Conductivity and pH
4 Sigma AS 950 portable compact Autosamplers with pH
2 Sigma 900 Max Insulated Autosamplers with Conductivity and pH
1 Sigma SD 900 insulated Autosamplers
3 Spare compact insulated autosampler bases—Sigma
3 Spare large insulated autosampler bases-24 bottle oonfguralion—Sigma
2 Spare large insulated autosampler bases-12 bottle configuration—Sigma
6 Sigma Lead-Acid Gel Cell Batteries
3 Sigma Battery Charger, 5 Stations
2 Sigma Data Transfer Unit DTU and Software
2 USB Flash drives
2 Digital pH probe
1 Analog pH probes
3 Analog Electrical conductivity probes
1 Impact gas detector
8.10
8.3.12 Discussion of Public Participation Activities
The District shall submit annually...a summary of public participation activities...
IRWD has a standing program of MWRP tours,where the public is instructed on the sewage collection and
treatment,as well as proper hazardous waste disposal practices. As Revenue Zones Nos.7 and 14, IRWD
is represented by OCSD in its public participation activities. As an operator of a sewage collection system,
IRWD is enrolled under the statewide general permit to manage fats, oils and grease discharges from food
service establishments. The public participation program is administered by IRWD staff.
8.3.13 Discussion of Sludge Disposal Activities
The District shall submit annually...a description of any changes in sludge disposal methods...
IRWD has not made changes in sludge disposal methods at this time. However, IRWD began Construction
in October 2013 of its Biosolids and Resource Recovery Project,that will consist of solids thickening, acid-
phase anaerobic digestion, dewatering, drying/pelletizing, energy generation using microturbines, and use
of pellets as a fertilizer or a-fuel. With completion of this project towards the end of 2019, IRWD will no
longer send its solids to OCSD for treatment.
8.3.14 IRWD Additional Information
The District shall submit annually...any concerns not described elsewhere in the report.
Michelson Water Recycling Plant Flow
Figure 8.6 shows the wastewater flow 22
received by MWRP over the last 35 years 20
MWRP flow has generally increased over the iso
years with a few exceptions. Average flow for 16
the 201712018 fiscal year was 20.23 MGD, o
which was an 11.6% increase from the 14
previous fiscal year. The increase in influent 12
flow can be attributed to the continued growth ._
within IRWD's service area and possibly from in—
fewer water conservation efforts being a
implemented by customers compared to 6
previous years. 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018
Figure 8.6 MWRP Influent Flow
Irvine Ranch Water District—Michelson Water Recycling Plant
Orange County Sanitation District
Nitrification/Denitrifcation Facilities
IRWD completed a significant upgrade to MWRP by installing a nitrification/denitrifcation system on its
activated sludge system in the 1998-99 fiscal year. Plant effluent is now fully nitrified year round and
substantially denitrified during the months when recycled water is stored in IRWD open storage reservoirs.
A fully nitrified effluent means that IRWD maintains a free chlorine residual ratherthan a combined chlorine
residual. A free chlorine residual causes a greater formation of trihalomethanes and related volatile organic
compounds,which is evident by the presence of total toxic organic Compounds in the effluent. Fortunately,
the quality of plant effluent,detention time in the plant,and short time before storage or use, keeps the level
of toxic organic compounds below regulatory criteria,even though a relatively high chlorine dose is required
to maintain bacterial quality. The operation of the nitrification/denitrifcation system has improved activated
sludge operations, which in turn, has increased the quality of recycled water.
8.11
Industrial Parks Development Status
Since the early 1980's, MWRP has been receiving increased industrial wastewater flows from the Irvine
Spectrum. The industrial parks located with IRWD's service area are primarily the Irvine Spectrum, a large
industrial park located near the former El Toro Marine Corps Air Station and the Foothill Ranch industrial
area, located north and east of the El Toro Marine Corps Air Station. The El Toro Marine Corps Air Station
is decommissioned and will be the site of the Great Park Development,a master planned community. IRWD
sees the potential for gradually increasing levels of organic pollutants and heavy metals as the Irvine
Spectrum industrial park and Foothill Ranch sites continue to expand and develop. The University of
California, Irvine is expanding the University Research Park located on the southern portion of the
university. IRWD sees a potential for organic priority pollutant and heavy metal discharges from the
industrial/research parks.
Stormwater, Deminimis Discharges and Selenium
In May 2009, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board adopted the fourth term Waste
Discharge Requirements for the County of Orange, Orange, County Flood Control District,and Incorporated
Cities of Orange County Within the Santa Ana Region Areawide Stormwater Runoff Orange County, Order
R8-2009-0030. A condition of this permit is a requirement that non-stormwater discharges be prohibited
from discharge into the storm drain system except for urban runoff and certain authorized non-stormwater
discharges. As a result, there has been an increase of non-wastewater discharges into the sewer system.
In general, these discharges contribute to the hydraulic loading to the sewer system and have not been a
significant source of conventional and other pollutants.
The northeastern side of the Irvine Basin is dominated by coastal foothills, and historically runoff from the
foothills deposited in a seasonal marsh called the Cienega de las Ranas. Natural weathering of the coastal
foothills has exposed and eroded the Monterey Formation containing significant amounts of selenium,
which over time have accumulated in the seasonal marsh. In addition to runoff, rising groundwater in the
area of the seasonal marsh has raised the concentration of selenium in surface water well above the
California Toxics Rule criterion of 5 pg/L. The seasonal marsh has been drained, first to promote
agriculture, and then the agricultural land has been converted into urban development. Surface waters in
the watershed are listed on the Section 303(d) list for selenium impairment, and discharges of water into
the surface water system above 5 pg/L are regulated under the Basin Plan.
The effect of the additional prohibition of non-
stonnwater discharging into the storm drain 5 —
system has resulted in additional non- 45
stormwater flows being discharged into the
sewer system containing significant levels of 4
rai
selenium from groundwater dewatering 3.5 INFLUENT
operations. Some of the discharges are 3 Z
tributary to OCSD's sewer system, and the
selenium is ultimately returned into the ocean. 25 E
However, some of the discharges are tributary 2= EFFLUENT
to the IRWD sewer system. IRWD has been 1.5- 14
tracking the fate and transport of selenium 1
since 2002 to garner knowledge on the effect
oftheadditional non-stormwater discharges on 0.5 —
MWRP effluent quality. During this last fiscal 0
year, the average effluent selenium 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
concentration was approximately 1.4 pg/L, Figure S.7 MWRP Influent and Effluent Selenium
under half the California Toxics Rule criterion. Irvine Ranch Water District—Michelson Water Recycling Plant
Prior to 2002,the concentration of selenium in orange county sanitation District
the wastewater was negligible, because there
was no selenium in the domestic water supply, there were no industries discharging selenium and non-
wastewater discharges into the sewer system were prohibited. Because selenium toxicity is based on
concentration, IRWD will continue to monitor the concentration of selenium in the influent and effluent from
8.12
the MWRP.
IRWD Oversight Activities
IRWD has monitored four major trunklines within its service area for priority pollutants. Commercial,
residential and industrial areas were monitored on an annual basis. One purpose of this monitoring is to
establish a long-term history of priority pollutant discharges into the sewer system. Phthalates are used to
maintain Flexibility in plastic products and are commonlyfound.The low concentrations of these constituents
are common and are considered emerging pollutants of concern.
Additionally, within the IRWD service area, industrial activities are regulated by the City of Irvine General
Plan and Zoning Ordinances,which confines industrial uses to specific zones and the City of Lake Forest,
which is the agency currently responsible for the Foothill Ranch Master Plan. Currently, IRWD is
reassessing it's monitoring programs and locations.
The IRWD service area encompasses the San Diego Creek watershed, the largest watershed that is
tributary to Newport Bay. Newport Bay and its tributary watersheds are subject to Total Maximum Daily
Load (TMDL) allocations for sediment, nutrients, pathogens, and toxics. IRWD does not discharge
wastewater into surface waters, other than its open storage reservoirs; however, as the sole purveyor of
water and recycled water in the watershed, IRWD has chosen to become involved with water quality
management in the watershed. IRWD is constructing and managing wetlands,under the Natural Treatment
Systems Project, which will remove pollutants of concern to the TMDL allocations. IRWD extends its
services to assist commercial and industrial users to recognize the importance of site runoff water quality,
point out sources of contamination and areas of potential contamination, and advice on corrective
measures.
Local Limits Study
Due to the completion of IRWD's Phase II Expansion at MWRP,as well as the construction of a solids and
biosolids handling facility, IRWD decided to undertake a technical evaluation of its local limits that began in
2016, and was completed and submitted to the Regional Board for their approval in October 2016. The
local limits study evaluated if IRWD's current limits are protective of not only the new unit processes within
IRWD, but were also protective enough to ensure that IRWD can produce Class A EO biosolids,as well as
potentially evaluate additional pollutants of concern. IRWD received approval of its local limits by the
Regional Board in 2018 and had them adopted by its Board in May 2018.
8.4 SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY (SAWPA)
OCSD has a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for ocean discharge
and is the Control Authority for the Pretreatment Program required by federal regulations. Because
SAWPA discharges to OCSD through the SARI Line, SAWPA is subject to OCSD's Pretreatment
Program. Through a 1991 Memorandum of Understanding (1991 MOU), OCSD enabled SAWPA to
be OCSD's Delegated Control Authority for the Pretreatment Program in the SAWPA's SARI Service
Area. SAWPA's responsibilities to run a Pretreatment Program on behalf of OCSD,ability to discharge
to the SARI Line, and other financial factors are governed by agreements between OCSD and
SAWPA, including the 1991 MOU and a 1996 Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Agreement It 996
Agreement), as amended and succeeded. OCSD routinely reviews all SAWPA Commission,
Commission Workshop, and Project meeting agendas and minutes to stay current with the activities
in the SAWPA area that may have an impact on the SAWPA Pretreatment Program. In addition,OCSD
routinely meets with SAWPA to coordinate at administrative,technical, management,and leadership levels
with varying levels of staff in attendance at each meeting to improve the coordination between OCSD's and
SAWPA's Pretreatment Programs and to enhance the working relationship with SAWPA in all areas of the
8.13
1991 MOU and 1996 Agreement.
SAWPA was formed in 1968 to develop a long-range plan for managing, preserving, and protecting the
quality of water supplies in the Santa Ana Basin. SAWPA is a Joint Powers Authority (JPA)consisting of
five agencies: Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA), Orange
County Water District (OCWD), San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (Valley District), and
Western Municipal Water District(WMWD). SAWPA's program in water quality management is integrated
with those of other local, state,and federal agencies.
The Inland Empire Brine Line(Brine Line)is a pipeline that is designed to carry saline wastewater from the
Upper Basin to the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)for disposal, after treatment, into the Pacific
Ocean. This wastewater today consists primarily of desalter brine and saline wastewater from industrial
uses, but also has some temporary domestic discharges. Wastewater from the Brine Line is transferred to
the SARI Line in Orange County which transports the wastewater to Orange County Sanitation District
(OCSD) Plant 2. A Flow meter installed at the Orange County line measures SAWPA's discharge. For the
12-month period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018, a total of 3,774 MG was discharged into the
Brine Line,for an average of 10.34 MGD,which leaves about 19.7 MGD of trunk line capacity available for
future use.The Flow metertmonitoring station at the Orange County line is sampled by SAWPA weekly.
8.4.1 Brine Line System Pretreatment Program Overview
SAWPA has a wastewater discharge ordinance applicable to the Brine Line. It is essentially, with some
appropriate modifications, substantially similar to OCSD's Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance.
In addition, a Memorandum of Understanding is in place to delineate pretreatment permitting, monitoring,
enforcement, and reporting responsibilities between SAWPA and OCSD. SAWPA has entered into a
Multijurisdictional Pretreatment Agreement(Agreement)with the Member Agencies, EMWD, IEUA, Valley
District, and WMWD and Contract Agencies, Jurupa Community Services District(JCSD), San Bernardino
Municipal Water Department (SBMWD), and Yucaipa Valley Water District (YVWD). This Agreement
delineates the pretreatment responsibilities between SAWPA and the agencies to carry out and enforce a
pretreatment program to control discharges from Industrial Users (IU)located in their service areas.
SAWPA owns and operates the Brine Line above or upstream of the Orange County line and has purchased
17 MGD of treatment and disposal capacity rights at OCSD's treatment facilities. SAWPA, through the
MOU with OCSD, has the ultimate responsibility to ensure adequate implementation of Pretreatment
Program responsibilities in the Upper Basin portion of the Brine Line. SAWPA issues permits to Direct and
Indirect Dischargers jointly with Member and Contract Agencies and solely issues permits to all Member
and Contract Agency owned or affiliated Direct and Indirect Dischargers. In addition, SAWPA has the
Permitting responsibilities for all Liquid Waste Haulers(LWH)that use the four SAWPA-approved Collection
Stations. The SAWPA LWH permits assign, for each discharger, a primary collection station and alternate
collection stations should the primary collection station become unavailable due to repairs or closure.
Agency staff assists in the conduct of the program for non-agency permittees within their service area.
SAWPA conducts all pretreatment oversight activities for agency owned or affiliated permittees. SAWPA
has identified, categorized and summarized the permits herein by geographical location and support from
the Member and Contract Agencies. Roles and responsibilities are defined in SAWPA's policies and
procedures. SAWPA has two dedicated full-time pretreatment personnel and additional an 1.6 full-time
equivalent(FTE)to assist with pretreatment responsibilities. Combined, the 3.6 FTE, along with additional
personnel from both Member and Contract Agencies,prepared and issued permits,conducted inspections,
prepared enforcement actions,and prepared monthly, quarterly, and annual reports by the date required.
8.14
Compliance and billing parameters are sampled at direct and indirect dischargers in accordance with
SAWPA's policies and procedures. All samples are properly preserved and iced for transport to the
laboratory. Chapter tables show the mass of pollutants as they were measured at OCSD's SARI Metering
Station (SMS)at the Orange County line. The data is based on average daily flow unless otherwise noted.
During the reporting period SAWPA continued implementation of numerous program documents and
worked to improve the operation and implementation of the Pretreatment Program. On September 19,
2017, the SAWPA Commission adopted a revised Ordinance (Ordinance Establishing Regulations for the
Use of the Inland Empire Brine Line)and updated Local Limits Resolution. SAWPA and the Member and
Contract Agencies use Pretreatment Program Control Documents (PPCDs) for uniform and consistent
implementation of the Pretreatment Program. Updates to the PPCDs as well as the permit templates for
Categorical Industrial Users(CIU), Significant Industrial Users (SIU), IU, and LWH are in development. A
Data Management System (iPACS)continued to be used.
Reporting below is individually presented for each SAWPA Pretreatment Program Member and Contract
Agency. Appendix H of this report, the SAWPA List of SIUs with Monitoring & Compliance Status, is an
updated list of significant industrial users which identifies which set of local or categorical standards applies
to each. The compliance statuses of all SAWPA permittees subject to federal categorical standards are
also shown in the Appendix H List of SIUs with Monitoring &Compliance Status.
A summary of the pretreatment equipment used by the dischargers is shown in Appendix H titled"SAWPA
Pretreatment Program Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment".
8.4.2 SAWPA, Member Agency, and Contract Agency Pretreatment Programs
8.4.2.1 Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD)
Description of EMWD
EMWD is a Municipal Water District responsible for the implantation of certain pretreatment
activities for the indirect and direct industries that discharge to EMWD's Non-Reclaimable Waste
Line, which discharges to the Brine Line at Reach V. In the face of declining groundwater levels
and continuing droughts, EMWD was formed in 1950 to secure additional water for a lightly
populated area of western Riverside County. EMWD joined the Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California a year later to augment its local supplies with recently available imported
water. EMWD also provides sewer service throughout its area. The EMWD headquarters are
located in Perris, California and serves the eastern portion of the watershed in Riverside County,
as well as portions of the Santa Margarita Watershed,south of the Santa Ana River Watershed.
Enforcement Action
• Infrneon Technologies Americas Corporation (Permit No. 11039-2.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action was issued to Infneon Technologies
Americas Corporation(Infrneon)on May 22,2018 for a Molybdenum analysis of 6.55 mg/L,
a violation of the Molybdenum concentration limit of 2.3 mg/L. The sample was collected
by EMWD at the Infneon storage tank (MP 002). Infneon was required to submit a
Corrective Action Plan (Plan)to EMWD no later than June 1, 2018. In addition, Infineon
8.15
was required to resample for Molybdenum and submit the sample results to EMWD no
later than June 21, 2018. Infineon's Plan was submitted to EMWD on May 25, 2018.
Infneon's Plan stated the source of Molybdenum was found to be in the anti-corrosion
chemical used in the cooling tower. A follow-up letter from Infineon dated June 19, 2018
stated a Molybdenum resample was collected from MP 002 on June 15, 2018. The
Molybdenum resample result was 0.079 mg/L, which indicated compliance with the 2.3
mg/L Molybdenum concentration limit. After the June 15, 2018 resample, Infineon located
an anti-corrosion chemical which is free of Molybdenum. The new chemical substitution
has been introduced into the water treatment process and Infineon shall continue to
periodically monitor at MP 002 to ensure compliance with Molybdenum. Implementation
of the corrective actions identified above and follow-up sampling indicated compliance;
subsequently, the enforcement action was closed. EMWD shall continue to conduct
unannounced inspections and wastewater monitoring at Infineon to ensure consistent
compliance with permit requirements and SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
8.4.2.2 Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA)
Description of IEUA
IEUA is a Municipal Water District responsible for the implementation of certain pretreatment
program activities for the direct and indirect industries located within IEUA's service area. IEUA,
originally named the Chino Basin Municipal Water District(CBMWD),was formed in 1950 to supply
supplemental water to the region. Since its formation, the Agency has expanded its areas of
responsibility from a supplemental water supplier to a regional wastewater treatment agency with
domestic and industrial disposal systems and energy recovery/production facilities. In addition,the
Agency has become a recycled water purveyor, bio-solids/fertilizer treatment provider and
continues as a leader in water supply salt management, for the purpose of protecting the region's
vital groundwater supplies.
IEUA strives to enhance the quality of life in the Inland Empire by providing optimum water
resources management for the area's customers while promoting conservation and environmental
protection. IEUA covers 242-square miles,distributes imported water, provides industrial/municipal
wastewater collection and treatment services, and other related utility services to more than
850,000 people.The Agency's service area includes the Cities of Chino, Chino Hills, Fontana,
Montclair,Ontario and Upland,as well as the Cucamonga Valley Water District and the Monte Vista
Water District.
Enforcement Actions
• California Institution for Men (Permit No. D1006-2.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action was issued to California Institution for
Men (CIM) by IEUA on December 19, 2017, for discharging wastewater with a pH below
6.0 on November 24,2017,and forfailure to notify IEUA within 24 hours of becoming aware
of the violation. The Order for Corrective Action required CIM to immediately investigate
the cause of the violation and submit a report to IEUA detailing the findings of its
investigation along with a corrective action plan designed to bring the facility into consistent
compliance with its permit. CIM investigation found an out of service softener tank caused
a substantial decrease in wastewater volume to the final wastewater holding tank. Acid is
injected into the final holding tank at a constant rate and this reduction caused pH in the
8.16
final holding tank to drop below 6.0 S.U. The discharge valve worked as designed;
however, when it closes a potable water flush cycle begins in the discharge pipe
downstream of the valve to keep the pH probe wet and conditioned. The discharge control
system opens the valve again and low pH wastewater hits the probe and this cycle
continues until the discharge valve is closed manually. CIM will respond promptly to low
pH alarms,close the valve manually,and treat wastewater accordingly prior to discharging.
CIM has also reduced the amount of acid it is injecting into its final wastewater collection
tank. Operational changes have been implemented to ensure the Chief Plant Operator
notifies IEUA within 24 hours. Since implementation of these operational changes CIM has
not violated pH limits. This has been verified by review of the continuous pH monitoring
report submitted to IEUA. Subsequent monitoring for pH also indicates compliance.
Implementation of the corrective actions identified above and follow-up sampling indicated
compliance; subsequently, the enforcement action was closed. IEUA will continue to
closely monitor CIM's discharge for long-term compliance with pH.
• Eastside Water Treatment Facility(Permit No. 11024.2.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action was issued to Eastside Water
Treatment Facility (Eastside) on April 5, 2018 by IEUA for discharging wastewater with
green algae solids to the IEUA Collection Station on April 4, 2018. Eastside was required
to submit a Corrective Action Plan (Plan) to IEUA no later than April 12, 2018. Prior to
submittal of the Plan, Eastside had removed the tank from service and thoroughly cleaned
and rinsed the tank. The required Plan was submitted to IEUA on April 11,2018. The Plan
stated the brine wastewater holding tank shall be inspected quarterly and emptied and
cleaned every six (6) months or as often as necessary. In addition, a maintenance log
shall be maintained to document the tank inspections and cleaning. Implementation of the
corrective actions identified above and follow-up observation and inspection indicated
compliance; subsequently, the enforcement action was closed. IEUA shall continue to
conduct unannounced inspections at Eastside and the IEUA Collection Station, review the
tank inspection log book, verify the tank is being cleaned as stated in the Plan to ensure
consistent compliance with permit requirements and SAWPA Ordinance No.8.
• Niagara Bottling, LLC (Permit No. 11114.1.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action was issued to Niagra Bottling, LLC
(Niagra Bottling)on August 31, 2017 by IEUA for discharging wastewater to the Brine Line
with a pH below 6.0 S.U. On August 12, 2017 Niagara Bottling attempted to discharge
brine wastewater to the IEUA Collection Station with a pH of 5.13 S.U.The IEUA Collection
Station's automated system closed the discharge valve which terminated the discharge.
Niagara Bottling was required to submit a written response to IEUA and submit a pH
resample by September 8, 2017. The Niagara Bottling pH resample collected on
September 5, 2017 indicated a pH of 6.91 S.U. The resample was accompanied by the
required written response which stated the effluent pH probe will be connected to an
automated shut off valve which will prevent pH noncompliant wastewater from being loaded
into the receiving tanker in the future. Installation of the automated shut off valve was
scheduled to be completed by October 31, 2017. Inspection conducted on November 8,
2017 by IEUA verified that the pH system and auto shut off valve were working as required.
Implementation of the corrective actions identified above and follow-up sampling and
inspection indicated compliance;subsequently,the enforcement action was closed. IEUA
shall continue to conduct unannounced inspections to ensure consistent compliance with
permit requirements and SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
8.17
• Repet, Inc. (Permit No. D1069-3.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action was issued to Repet, Inc. (Repet)on
April 5, 2018 by IEUA for an Oil and Grease Non-Polar (O&G-NP) sample report of 127
mg/L a violation of the O&G-NP concentration limit of 94.1 mg/L as stated in the permit.
The sample was collected by Repel and reported in the March 9, 2018 SMR. Repel was
required to submit a Corrective Action Plan (Plan) and an O&G-NP resample to IEUA no
Iaterthan April 12,2018. The required Plan was submitted to IEUA on April 11,2018. The
Plan stated the cause of the O&G-NP violation was due to the insufficient maintenance
and cleaning of the transitional discharge tank located under shaker#2. The Plan stated
that going forward the transitional discharge tank shall be inspected daily by each shift
supervisor. A maintenance log shall be maintained to document the transitional discharge
tank inspections and cleaning. In addition,two(2)O&G-NP resamples were also submitted
on April 11, 2018. The O&G-NP results from April 3, 2018 (86 mg/L) and April 5, 2018
(80mg/L) both indicate compliance with the Repel O&G-NP permit concentration limit of
94.1 mg/L. Implementation of the corrective actions identified above and follow-up
sampling indicated compliance; subsequently, the enforcement action was closed. IEUA
shall continue to conduct unannounced inspections, review the maintenance log
documenting the transitional discharge tank inspections and cleaning, and conduct
wastewater monitoring at Repet to ensure consistent compliance with permit requirements
and SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
• ShawCor Pipe Protections, LLC (Permit No. 11077.2.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action was issued to ShawCor Pipe
Protection,LLC(ShawCor)by IEUA on November 20,2017,for repeatedly failing to submit
self-monitoring reports by the required due date. The Order for Corrective Action required
ShawCor to immediately investigate the cause of the violation and submit a report to IEUA
detailing the findings of its investigation along with a corrective action plan designed to
bring the facility into consistent compliance with its permit. ShawCor corporate investigated
the incidents and while the exact cause of the reporting delays is not well understood,
several deficiencies were identified in the site business processes. As a result, the Plant
Manager was terminated. ShawCor corporate implemented several actions immediately
to ensure compliance obligations are met. This included filling the Health, Safety, and
Environmental Manager position, who will be responsible for ensuring all self-monitoring
reporting is submitted to IEUA by the required due date. ShawCor also added self-
monitoring reporting to the sites Calendar of Compliance. Implementation of the corrective
actions identified above and follow-up sampling indicated compliance; subsequently, the
enforcement action was closed. However, further violations were identified at this facility
and additional enforcement was conducted.
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action was issued to ShawCor on April 10,
2018 by IEUA for discharging wastewater to the Brine Line with a pH below 6.0 S.U. On
April 10, 2018, ShawCor attempted to discharge brine wastewater to the IEUA collection
station with a pH of 5.68 S.U. The IEUA Collection Station's automated system closed the
discharge valve which terminated the discharge. IEUA inspectors received a text message
indicating a pH violation had occurred at the station and immediately responded. IEUA
personnel conducted an inspection of the tanker truck at the collection station. During the
inspection the pH of the wastewater in the tankertruck was confirmed to be below 6.0 S.U.,
a violation of permit No. I1077-2.1,which states pH of wastewater must be between 6.0 to
12.0 S.U. ShawCor was required to investigate the cause of the violation and submit a
8.18
written response. ShawCor responded on May 9, 2018 stating the low pH wastewater was
caused by faulty pretreatment system pH meter. The faulty pH meter was immediately
replaced, and ShawCor will check pH of wastewater with a secondary pH device before
each discharge going forward. The IEUA collection station continuous pH monitoring data
revealed subsequent wastewater loads discharged to the IEUA collection station have met
compliance with pH limits. Implementation of the corrective actions identified above and
follow-up sampling indicated compliance; subsequently, the enforcement action was
closed. However, further violations were identified at this facility and additional
enforcement was conducted.
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action (NOV/OCA)was issued to ShawCor
on June 13, 2018 by SAWPA for the late submittal of SMR's for the months of May 2017,
September 2017, November 2017, and April 2018. In addition, the NOWOCA was also
issued for the April 9, 2018 wastewater sample, collected at the IEUA Collection Station
(MP 002), which indicated a Zinc analysis result of 3.93 mg/L and a Chromium analysis
result of 4.42 mg/L violations of the Daily Maximum Limitation of 2.61 mg/L for Zinc and
2.77 mg/L for Chromium and the Monthly Average Discharge of 1.48 mg/L for Zinc and
1.71 mg/L for Chromium. The NOV/OCA will require ShawCor to attend a Violation
Meeting at SAWPA on July 2, 2018 to discuss the violations and for ShawCor to propose
solutions prior to issuance of future enforcement if necessary.
8.4.2.3 Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD)
Description of JCSD
JCSD is a public agency responsible for the implementation of certain pretreatment program
activities for the direct industries connected to the Brine Line via JCSD's sewer collection system
within its service area (Brine Line Reach IV-D). JCSD headquarters is located at 11201 Harrel
Street in the City of Jumps Valley. JCSD was formed in 1956 and provides water, sewer, park
services,graffiti abatement,and street lighting. In 1988 the District formed the Community Facilities
District No. 1 to provide for water, sewer,flood control and street infrastructure within the industrial
portion of the Mina Loma area. The boundaries of CFD No. 1 expanded from 1,900 acres to 3,000
acres in 1992. In June 1989,JCSD contracted with WMWD for capacity in Reach IV-D of the Brine
Line.
Enforcement Action
• Del Real Foods, LLC (Permit No. D1021.2.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action was issued to Del Real Foods, LLC
(Del Real) by SAWPA on July 14, 2016 for a bypass in the pretreatment wet well and for
exceedance of their Brine Line purchased capacity. The Order for Corrective Action(OCA)
required Del Real to submit a corrective action plan regarding the bypass and to apply for
additional Brine Line capacity. Del Real repaired and made improvements to the existing
alarm system to the wet well, which was verified by SAWPA during inspection. Del Real
also installed and repaired screens for the production room drains. Del Real submitted a
request for additional Brine Line capacity and a Water Balance Report which detailed water
consumption and wastewater discharged to the Brine Line. Del Real agreed to purchase
an additional 163,000 gallons of Brine Line capacity and submitted the Water Balance
Report. Del Real has completed the requirements identified in the OCA. SAWPA shall
close the Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action upon issuance of a revised
wastewater discharge permit, which shall include additional reporting requirements to
8.19
ensure consistent compliance with SAWPA Ordinance No. 8 and SAWPA Local Limits
(Resolution No.2017-11),or any successors thereto.
8.4.2.4 San Bernardino Municipal Water Department (SBMWD)
Description of SBMWD
SBMWD is a Municipal Water Department and is responsible for administering certain pretreatment
program activities for indirect industries associated with the SBMWD Brine Line Collection Station.
SBMWD provides potable water and sewerage services for the City of San Bernardino, in addition
to sewerage service for the cities of Loma Linda and Highland, as well as, some isolated county
areas. These services are augmented by the operation of a brine waste collection station which
provides an alternate disposal site for industries which generate high strength brine waste. The
SBMWD, under contract with the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District,is responsible for
administering the pretreatment program associated with the SBMWD Brine Line Collection Station.
Enforcement Action
• Patton State Hospital (Permit No. 11060-2.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action was issued to Patton State Hospital
(Patton)by SBMWD on February 14,2018 forfailing to submit the required annual January
2018 self-monitoring report by the due date of February 7, 2018. Patton was required to
submit a written response to SBMWD by February 24, 2018. In addition, Patton was also
required to submit the January 2018 self-monitoring report no later than March 16, 2018.
The required written response was submitted to SBMWD on February 16, 2018. The
response stated all self-monitoring events shall be scheduled on Patton's Preventative
Maintenance Program to provide all future sampling events to staff for submittal. Patton's
January 2018 self-monitoring report was submitted to SBMWD on March 14, 2018.
Implementation of the corrective actions identified above and review of further submittals
indicated compliance; subsequently, the enforcement action was closed. SBMWD shall
continue to track and review all reports and documents submitted by Patton to ensure
consistent compliance with permit requirements and SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
8.4.2.5 San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (Valley District)
Description of Valley District
Valley District is a Municipal Water District responsible for the implementation of certain
pretreatment program activities for the direct industries connected to the Brine Line within its
service area (Brine Line Reach IV-E). Valley District headquarters is located in the City of San
Bernardino and serves most of the northern and eastern reaches of the watershed in San
Bernardino County with a small portion of its service area in Riverside County. Valley District was
formed in 1954 to plan long-range water supply for the San Bernardino Valley. It is the only State
Water Contractor within SAWPA and imports water into its service area through participation in the
California State Water Project while also managing groundwater storage within its boundaries. It
was incorporated under the Municipal Water District Act of 1911 (California Water Code Section
7100 at seq., as amended). Its enabling act includes a broad range of powers to provide water, as
well as wastewater, stormwaler disposal, recreation, and fire protection services.
8.20
Enforcement Action
• City of Colton-Ague Manse Power Plant(Permit No. D7002.3.1)
The City of Colton —Agua Mansa Power Plant failed to perform required self-monitoring
for the January 1, 2018 to July 31, 2018 monitoring period. Enforcement for this violation
is anticipated to be issued in July of 2018.
8.4.2.6 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA)
Description of SAWPA
SAWPA is a Joint Powers Authority, classified as a Special District under State of California law,
responsible for the implementation of the pretreatment program for the industries connected to the
Brine Line. SAWPA consists of five Member Agencies; Eastern Municipal Water District(EMWD),
Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA), Orange County Water District (OCWD), San Bernardino
Valley Municipal Water District (Valley District), and Western Municipal Water District (WMWD).
SAWPA, through the MOU with OCSD, has the ultimate responsibility to ensure adequate
implementation of Pretreatment Program responsibilities in the Upper Basin portion of the Brine
Line. SAWPA issues permits to Direct and Indirect Dischargers jointly with Member and Contract
Agencies and solely issues permits to all Member and Contract Agency owned or affiliated Direct
and Indirect Dischargers.
SAWPA solely permits the Waste Haulers allowing for the Waste Haulers to have only one permit
to provide service to the four Member Agencies'Collection Stations.This also facilitates utilization
of the Generator's regular Waste Hauler if an Alternate Collection Station must be used. SAWPA
expects to be making revisions to its Ordinance in the next fiscal year including new language for
the Waste Hauler Program.
Enforcement Action
• Inland Bioenergy, LLC(Permit No. 131072-2.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action was issued to Inland Bioenergy, LLC
(Inland Bioenergy)by SAWPA on September 21,2017 for operating and discharging to the
Brine Line without a valid permit after the discovery that the former Authorized
Representative was no longer affiliated with the facility. In addition, a TTO 624 self-
monitoring sample was not collected in a preserved container and therefore the analysis
was deemed invalid. Inland Bioenergy was required to submit a Brine Line Permit
Application to SAWPA no later than September 26, 2017. Also, Inland Bioenergy was
required to resample for TTOs by October 6, 2017 and to submit a written response to
SAWPA no later than September 30, 2017. Inland Bioenergy's Brine Line Permit
Application was received by SAWPA on September 26, 2017. Inland Bioenergy's written
response to the TTO 624 not being collected properly was received by SAWPA on
September 28,2017. The response stated an error by the contract lab resulted in the TTO
sample being collected incorrectly. Prior to Inland Bioenergy completing the requirements
of the Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action, due to subsequent enforcement,
SAWPA denied Inland Bioenergy to discharge to the Brine Line until a new permit is issued
by SAWPA. As such, the TTO resample requirement will be reviewed by SAWPA due to
the September 2017 revision to SAWPA's Local Limits removing TTO as a Local Limit upon
potential issuance of a new permit.
8.21
A Cease and Desist, Compliance, and Civil Penalty Order was issued to Inland Bioenergy
by SAWPA on October 13, 2017 for discharging sludge and polymer to the Brine Line.
Inland Bioenergy failed to report either illicit discharge as required by SAWPA Ordinance
No. 8. Inland Bioenergy was required to cease all discharge of any waste and or
wastewater in a notice to the facility given on October 9, 2018 and then confirmed within
the October 13 Order. Inland Bioenergy was required to submit a written report,containing
among other requirements an explanation and corrective actions for the violations, to
SAWPA by October 27, 2017. Inland Bioenergy was also required to pay a penalty fee of
$14,247.50 for the eleven violations issued and for costs associated with cleaning the Brine
Line. The Inland Bioenergy required written report was received on October 27, 2017 by
SAWPA. SAWPA's review of the written report determined additional information was
required of Inland Bioenergy. Inland Bioenergy was required to submit a second written
report to SAWPA by November 18, 2017. Inland Bioenergy requested an extension for
submittal of the second written report to November 20, 2017, which was granted by
SAWPA. The Inland Bioenergy second written report was received on November 20,2017
by SAWPA,which outlined the corrective measures, including daily containments structure
observation logs and personnel changes to be made by Inland Bioenergy to ensure future
violations of this nature do not occur in the future should Inland Bioenergy be issued a new
permit. As of June 30, 2018,SAWPA has proceeded with the development of a new Brine
Line Discharge Permit based on the commitment by Inland Bioenergy to maintain
compliance with future permit requirements and SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
8.4.2.7 Western Municipal Water District (WMWD)
Description of WMWD
WMWD is a Municipal Water District responsible for the implementation of certain pretreatment
program activities for the direct and indirect industries connected to the Brine Line within its service
area. WMWD was formed in 1954 under the Municipal Water District Act of 1911 for the purpose
of bringing supplemental water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to a
growing western Riverside County. Western's service area covers 527 square miles, serving a
population of approximately 900,000 people. The District serves 10 wholesale customers with
imported water via the Colorado River and the State Water Project. WMWD also supplies
imported water and groundwater directly to approximately 25,000 residential, commercial and
agricultural customers in the areas of El Sobrante, Eagle Valley, Temescal Creek, Woodcrest,
Orangecrest, Mission Grove, Lake Mathews, March Air Reserve Base, Rainbow Canyon and
portions of the cities of Riverside and Murrieta. The Murrieta division provides water and
wastewater services in a 6.5-square mile portion of Murrieta and relies on both groundwater and
imported sources. WMWD headquarters is located in Riverside,California and serves the western
Riverside County portion of the watershed, as well as portions of the Santa Margarita Watershed,
south of the Santa Ana River Watershed.
Enforcement Action
• Decra Roofing Systems (Permit No. 11020.2.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action (NOV/OCA)was issued by WMWD
to Decra Roofing Systems (Decra) on October 24, 2017 for discharging wastewater from
8.22
an unapproved tank. Decra was required to provide a written investigative report by
November 7, 2017,and replace or repair the approved A-1 holding tank before they would
be allowed to discharge to the Brine Line again. WMWD conducted a compliance
inspection on October 23, 2017 in order to investigate the causes of the violation. Decra
Roofing Systems provided the required written response to the NOV/OCA on October 26,
2017. WMWD conducted a follow up compliance inspection on November 1,2017 to verify
the installation of the new A-1 holding tank and monitoring point. Decra Roofing Systems
successfully installed the new A-1 holding tank and monitoring point as required and was
given permission to resume hauling to the Brine Line. Implementation of the corrective
actions identified above and follow-up inspection indicated compliance; subsequently,the
enforcement action was closed. WMWD shall continue to conduct unannounced
inspections at Decra to ensure consistent compliance with permit requirements and
SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action (NOV/OCA)was issued by WMWD
to Decra Roofing Systems (Decra) on January 10, 2018 for improperly completing the
Chain of Custody on for the December 8, 2017 Self-Monitoring Report(SMR). Review of
the December 8, 2017 SMR Chain of Custody revealed the signatures of the persons
relinquishing the sample were missing, the name of the person receiving the sample was
missing, and the date and times of receiving the samples were missing. This was the
second violation of this nature to occur within twelve months. The first violation occurred
on May 4, 2017 with a Written Warning issued to Decra at that time. The Written Warring
stated "If there is a repeat of this issue, Decra will no longer be allowed to conduct its own
self-monitoring'. Pursuamto the January 10,2018 NOWOCA, Decra's approval to conduct
its own self-monitoring was revoked. Decra has contracted the self-monitoring with an
appropriately certified laboratory as required. Implementation of the corrective actions
identified above and follow-up review of submittals indicated compliance; subsequently,
the enforcement action was closed. WMWD shall continue to review all reports and
documents submitted by Decra to ensure consistent compliance with permit requirements
and SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
• Giuliano 8 Sons Briners, Inc.(Permit No. 11031-2.1)
Giuliano S Sons Briners, Inc. (Giuliano)collected a sample for self-monitoring on June 26,
2018. Review of the June 26,2018 self-monitoring report data indicates a Copper analysis
of 3.3 mg/L a violation of the daily maximum discharge limitation of 3.0 mg/L and a Zinc
analysis of 14.0 mg/L, a violation of the daily maximum discharge limitation of 10.0 mg/L.
Furthermore,as 100%of the measurements taken exceeded the daily maximum discharge
limitations for the January 2018 through June 2018 evaluation period Giuliano is
determined to be in SNC for the 3rd and 4th quarter of the 2017 -2018 Fiscal Year for
Chronic Violations for the parameters of Copper and Zinc. Enforcement for these violations
is anticipated to be issued in July of 2018.
• Qualified Mobile, Inc.(Permit No. 11064.3.1)
A Cease and Desist Order was issued by SAWPA to Qualified Mobile, Inc. on August 31,
2017 for discharging wastewater from an unauthorized location. On August 28, 2017
Qualified Mobile, Inc. informed WMWD that they had relocated their operation to a
temporary location and had wastewater hauled to the WMWD Brine Line Collection Station
without prior notification and approval. Qualified Mobile was ordered to immediately cease
all discharge to the Brine Line until a new permit had been issued for the temporary
8.23
location. Qualified Mobile, Inc. submitted a permit application on August 28, 2017 for the
temporary location and a new permit(11064-3)was issued on September 13, 2017 for the
temporary location. As of June 30, 2018, Qualified Mobile has not moved to their final
location and are still operating under the permit issued for the temporary location.
Implementation of the new permit for the temporary location indicated compliance;
subsequently, the enforcement action was closed. WMWD shall continue to conduct
unannounced inspections at Decra to ensure consistent compliance with permit
requirements and SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
• Wellington Foods, Inc.(Permit No. D1086-2.1)
A Notice of Violation and Order for Corrective Action (NOV/OCA)was issued by WMWD
to Wellington Foods on August 16, 2017 for exceeding their permitted purchase capacity
of 0.20 MGD for seven (7)days between July 12, 2017 and August 2, 2017. Wellington
Foods was required to review their flow logs each day to ensure compliance with their
permitted purchase capacity and to submit a written response detailing the cause and
corrective actions to WMWD by August 30, 2017. The Wellington Foods written response
was received on August 30, 2017. The response stated that equipment issues and a
malfunction due to computer programming caused the excessive flow to the Brine Line. It
further stated all equipment had been repaired and the computer control system had been
reprogrammed as necessary. Employees were re-trained to review the flow log daily and
to report any flow excursions immediately to their supervisors. Implementation of the new
corrective actions listed above and review of submittals indicated compliance;
subsequently, the enforcement action was closed. WMWD shall continue to conduct
unannounced inspections at Wellington Foods to ensure compliance with all permit
requirements and SAWPA Ordinance No. 8.
8.4.2.8 Yucaipa Valley Water District (YVWD)
Description of YVWD
YVWD is a Water District responsible for the implementation of certain pretreatment program
activities for the industries connected to the Brine Line within its service area. Currently there are
no permitted users within the YVWD Service Area. YVWD was formed on September 14, 1971,
when the Secretary of State of the State of California certified and declared formation of the District.
The District operates under the County Water District Law, being Division 12 of the Stale of
California Water Code. Although the immediate function of the District at the time was to provide
water service, the YVWD currently provides a variety of services to residential, commercial and
industrial customers. The YVWD provides sewer collection and sewer treatment services. Sewer
treatment takes place at the highly advanced Wochholz Regional Water Recycling Facility that
provides advanced treatment, including the capability to demineralize the recycled water. The
demineralization process involves a reverse osmosis system that separates small molecules from
the recycled water supply. In 2012,the YVWD completed an extension of the Inland Empire Brine
Line operated by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. The brine disposal facility is critical
to insure the YVWD meets the stringent water quality objectives set by the Regional Water Quality
Control Board for the Yucaipa Management Zone, Beaumont Management Zone and the San
Timoteo Management Zone.
Enforcement Action
There was no enforcement action during this reporting period.
8.24
8.4.3 Self-Monitoring Program, Field Inspection, Sampling, and Monitoring QA/QC
A self-monitoring program is required of permittees discharging to the Brine Line. The self-monitoring
reports (SMRs) are delivered to the applicable agency for review and action if required. The SMR water
quality data is included in the SAWPA Data Management System.
SAWPA conducts sampling QA/QC in accordance with EPA requirements including equipment blanks and
field blanks. Analysis of the QA/QC data indicated samples collected were representative and free of
contamination. Appendix H shows sample results for SAWPA industrial users.
8.4.4 Identification of New Permittees
SAWPA requires a wastewater discharge permit for all facilities with discharge to the Brine Line, with the
exception of certain areas in the JCSD and WMWD service areas, therefore new permittees are identified
upon their completion of a wastewater discharge permit application. The majority of new companies
identified by SAWPA or upstream agencies in areas upstream of emergency connections are discovered
by Feld inspectors responding to completed industrial user surveys that indicate an inspection is warranted
or during inspections of previously unoccupied warehouse and facility spaces. Facilities identified upstream
of emergency connections requiring a permit are responded to by the upstream agency with oversight by
SAWPA. These permitted facilities are listed in the emergency permit fact sheet and in the corresponding
agency's Annual Reports.
Eastern Municipal Water District(EMWD)
In the EMWD service area all new proposed connections or proposed new indirect dischargers
must complete a permit application that is thoroughly reviewed by EMWD and SAWPA prior to
developing a permit. The draft permit is then reviewed and commented on by SAWPA and OCSD
before issuing a final permit.
Inland Empire Utilities Agency(IEUA)
In the IEUA service area, IEUA collaborates with the City of Chino to identify industries that may
be subject to Federal Categorical Standards or local limits. No industries are allowed to connect
to the Brine Line until they have entered into a capacity right agreement with IEUA and obtained a
wastewater discharge permit issued by IEUA and SAWPA as required. IEUA in partnership with
the City of Chino obtains new business information from the following:
• City business licensing departments
• Industrial User Survey questionnaires
• City utility service requests
• City referrals during storm water inspections
The majority of new companies that could potentially connect to the Brine Line are identified by
IEUA field inspectors while out inspecting current permittees and when following up on tips provided
by the City of Chino Source Control division. Facilities identified upstream of an emergency
connection are listed in the emergency permit fact sheet and in the IEUA Annual Report.
8.25
Juruna Community Services District(JCSD)
In the JCSD service area SAWPA checks various sources for companies that may be subject to
Federal Categorical Standards or local limits. Wastewater permits are issued by SAWPA and
JCSD as required. SAWPA or JCSD obtains new business information from the following:
• The building department and business license process
• Industrial User Survey(IUS)questionnaires are completed by new water/sewer customers,
the IUS is verified by site inspections
• Agency utility service requests and high water users are inspected for wastewater
generating activities
• Industry,trade, or association magazines
• Internet searches&field observations
• New construction/tenant improvement—plan checks
JCSD will conduct regular inspections of all customers connected to the Inland Empire Brine Line
(Brine Line) to verify the type of wastewater generated at their location. In addition, any closed-
circuit TV(CCTV)revealing a possible illegal connection will be investigated. The majority of new
companies identified by SAWPA or upstream agencies in these scenarios are discovered by field
inspectors responding to completed industrial user surveys that indicate an inspection is warranted
or during inspections of previously unoccupied warehouse and facility spaces. A priority
determination is assigned as follows: High Priority—any non-permitted facility generating industrial
wastewater is inspected and monitored annually for local limits, Medium Priority — any dry
manufacturing facility is inspected every 2 years unless changes to manufacturing and Low Priority
— warehouse/commercial business is inspected every 5 years. Facilities identified in the JCSD
service area requiring a permit is reviewed by SAWPA with final permit concurrence by OCSD.
Facilities identified upstream of emergency connections in other jurisdictions requiring a permit are
reviewed to by the upstream agency with oversight by SAWPA.These permitted facilities are listed
in the emergency permit fact sheet and in the corresponding agency's Annual Reports.
San Bernardino Municipal Water Department(SBMWD)
In the SBMWD service area all new proposed connections or proposed new indirect dischargers
must complete a permit application that is thoroughly reviewed by SBMWD and SAWPA prior to
developing a permit. The draft permit is then reviewed and commented on by SAWPA and OCSD
before issuing a final permit.
San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District(Valley District)
In the Valley District service area all new proposed connections must complete a permit application
that is thoroughly reviewed by Valley District and SAWPA prior to developing a permit. The draft
permit is then reviewed and commented on by SAWPA and OCSD before issuing a final permit.
Western Municipal Water District(WMWD)
In the WMWD service area, with the exception of the areas upstream of the Corona WRF No. 1
and WRCWRA SRPS, all new proposed connections or proposed new indirect dischargers must
complete a permit application that is thoroughly reviewed by WMWD and SAWPA prior to
developing a permit. The draft permit is then reviewed and commented on by SAWPA and OCSD
before issuing a final permit. Forthe Corona WRF No. 1 permit WMWD directs the City of Corona,
with oversight by SAWPA, through their industrial survey process.The City of Corona is alerted of
8.26
any new business moving into their jurisdiction through the building department and business
license process. New businesses are given a pretreatment questionnaire which is returned to the
Pretreatment Department and reviewed. Pretreatment personnel visit the site to verify the
information submitted in the questionnaire.
In the WMWD service area with potential to discharge to the Brine Line in an emergency condition
from the WRCRWA SRPS, WRCRWA checks for various sources for companies that may be
subject to Federal Categorical Standards or local limits. Wastewater permits are issued by
WRCRWA agencies as required. WRCRWA obtains new business information from the following:
• The building department and business license process
• Industrial User Survey(IUS)questionnaires are completed by new water/sewer customers,
the IUS is verified by site inspections
• Agency utility service requests and high water users are inspected for wastewater
generating activities
• Industry,trade, or association magazines
• Internet searches&field observations
• New construction/tenant improvement—plan checks
Yucaipa Valley Water District(YVWD)
In the YVWD service area upstream of the Henry Wochholz Regional Water Recycling Facility,
YVWD checks various sources for companies that may be subject to Federal Categorical
Standards or local limits. Wastewater permits are issued by YVWD as required. YVWD obtains
new business information from the following:
• The building department and business license process
• Industrial User Survey(IUS)questionnaires are completed by new water/sewer customers,
the IUS is verified by site inspections
• Agency utility service requests and high-water users are inspected for wastewater
generating activities
• Industry,trade, or association magazines
• Internet searches&field observations
• New construction/tenant improvement—plan checks
8.4.5 SAWPA Member and Contract Agency Ordinances and Resolutions
• SAWPA adopted Ordinance No. 8 and Local Limits Resolution 2017-11 on September 19, 2017
• EMWD adopted EMWD Ordinance No. 91.3, incorporating the changes made for SAWPA
Ordinance No. 8 on May 2, 2018.
• IEUA adopted IEUA Ordinance No. 106, incorporating the changes made for SAWPA Ordinance
No.8 on February 21, 2018.
• JCSD adopted the JCSD Brine Line Ordinance 423 on January 8, 2018, incorporating the
changes made for SAWPA Ordinance No. 8. JCSD adopted JCSD Brine Line Ordinance 424,
incorporating the changes made for SAWPA Resolution 2017-11 on January 22, 2018.
• SBMWD adopted SAWPA Resolution No. 2017-11 with SBMWD Resolution No. 918 on October
17, 2017. SBMWD adopted SAWPA Ordinance No. 8 with SBMWD Resolution No. 919 on
October 17, 2017.
8.27
• Valley District SBVMWD adopted Valley District Ordinance No. 80, incorporating the changes
made for SAWPA Ordinance No. 8 on June 19,2018.
• WMWD adopted WMWD Brine Line Ordinance No. 389, incorporating the changes made for
SAWPA Ordinance No. 8 on March 21, 2018.
• YVWD adopted SAWPA Ordinance No. 8 by Resolution on October 3, 2017. YVWD adopted
SAWPA Resolution No. 2017-11 by Resolution on February 6, 2018.
8.4.6 Permittees in Significant Noncompliance (SNC)
Summary of SAWPA and Member/Contract Agency Permittees in SNC
July 1, 2017—June 30, 2018
Agency Company permit No. Reporting or Discharge Violation
Name
WMWD Giuliano &Sons Briners, Inc. 11031-2.1 Discharge Violation
Giuliano&Sons Briners, Inc. (Permit No. 11031-2.1)
Giuliano & Sons Briners, Inc. (Giuliano) collected a sample for self-monitoring on June 26, 2018.
Review of the June 26, 2018 self-monitoring report data indicates a Copper analysis of 3.3 mg/L a
violation of the daily maximum discharge limitation of 3.0 mg/L and a Zinc analysis of 14.0 mg/L, a
violation of the daily maximum discharge limitation of 10.0 mg/L. Furthermore, as 100% of the
measurements taken exceeded the daily maximum discharge limitations for the January 2018 through
June 2018 evaluation period Giuliano is determined to be in SNC for the 3rd and 4th quarter of the
2017-2018 Fiscal Year for Chronic Violations for the parameters of Copper and Zinc. Enforcementfor
these violations is anticipated to be issued in July of 2018.
8.4.7 Non-Industrial Source Control and Public Education Programs
EMWD supports an extensive education program designed to provide a useful academic experience at all
grade levels.
IEUA educates its permittees during site inspections when applicable for typical outreach efforts such as
FOG and hazardous waste education.
JCSD's Pretreatment staff coordinates public outreach in cooperation with JCSD's Community Affairs Staff.
The public outreach occurs in community newsletters, public outreach events such as JCSD's Open House
and Wellness Events, and JCSD's website. Topics include FOG Control, root control, hazardous waste
disposal and Sewer System Management Plan components. Information is provided to the dischargers
during the permit renewal process and site inspections.
SBMWD implements a number of outreach programs to educate industry and to minimize pollutants
discharged. Field inspectors provide Best Management Practice (BMP) brochures during site inspections
8.28
to educate industry and minimize the discharge of pollutants. SBMWD operates a quarterly Silver Waste
Disposal Program to provide a disposal site for small quantity silver generators within the service area.
Valley District provides public educational information to their customers to encourage the efficient use of
water through advertising,classroom instruction, contests, paying 25%of retail water agency rebates, etc.
In collaboration with its retail water agencies, iEffcient.com was created,which provides water-saving tips
and information on water issues. Valley District conducts regular Board Meetings which are open to the
public on the 1r and 3' Tuesday of each Month. Valley District also provides public information via their
website at http://www.sbvmwd.wm/ which includes scheduled events and other opportunities for public
participation on a variety of issues.
WMWD provides public educational information to their customers to encourage the efficient use of water
through advertising, rebates, programs,and workshops.
SAWPA Agency Dental Amalgam Programs
Eastern Municipal Water District(EMWD)
EMWD has no areas of discharge to the Brine Line which have dental facilities.
Inland Empire Utilities Agency(IEUA)
IEUA has no direct connections from dental facilities within theirjurisdiction. In the IEUAjurisdiction
area there in one Emergency Permit with an area that has dental facilities that can discharge to the
Brine Line in the event of an emergency,the IEUA Los Serranos area. As of June 30, 2018, IEUA
has completed the inventory of dentists that discharge from the Los Serranos area. IEUA is
currently in the process of sending the one-time compliance report(OCTR)survey to these dentists.
Jurupa Community Services District(JCSD)
JCSD has no dental facilities from the areas with direct connections to the Brine Line. In the JCSD
jurisdiction area there are various Emergency Permits that have dental facilities that can discharge
to the Brine Line in the event of an emergency. As of June 30, 2018, JCSD has issued surveys to
all dental facilities that discharge within the Emergency Permitted service area. All open facilities
have submitted their one-time compliance report (OTCR) and have been inspected to verify
compliance.
San Bernardino Municipal Water Department(SBMWD)
SBMWD has no direct connections from dental facilities within their jurisdiction. In the SBMWD
jurisdiction area there in one Emergency Permit with an area that has dental facilities that can
discharge to the Brine Line in the event of an emergency,the SBMWD WRP. As of June 30,2018,
SBMWD has issued surveys to all dental facilities that discharge within this area that may discharge
to the Brine Line in the event of an emergency. SBMWD is awaiting the submittal of the issued
surveys to develop a plan for implementation of the DIU regulations.
San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District(Valley District)
Valley District has no areas of discharge to the Brine Line which have dental facilities.
8.29
Western Municipal Water District(WMWD)
WMWD has no direct connections from dental facilities within their jurisdiction. In the WMWD
jurisdiction area there are two Emergency Permits with areas that have dental facilities that can
discharge to the Brine Line in the event of an emergency:
• Corona WRF No. t
As of July 31,2018,the City of Corona has issued surveys to all dental facilities that discharge
to the Corona WRF No. 1 and have received those surveys back from the dental facilities.
Corona is now in the process of follow-up inspections and compiling missing information as
necessary.
• WRCRWA SRPS
WRCRWA has three agency jurisdictions that discharge to the WRCRWA SRPS: WMWD,
Home Gardens,and City of Norco. The WMWD area is residential and no dental facilities have
been identified. As of June 30,2018, Home Gardens has issued surveys to all dental facilities
that discharge to the WRCRWA SRPS from within their jurisdiction and are awaiting all to be
returned. As of June 30, 2018, the City of Norco has identified all of the dental facilities that
discharge to the WRCRWA SRPS from within their jurisdiction and is in the process of issuing
surveys to these facilities.
Yucaipa Valley Water District(YVWD)
YVWD has no direct connections from dental facilities within their jurisdiction. YVWD has one
permit, issued by SAWPA, for the Henry Wochholz Water Reclamation Facility that discharges
Brine Wastewater from a reclamation process for the wastewater treatment plant. As of June 30,
2018, For the area that discharges to the YVWD Henry Wochholz Water Reclamation Facility
YVWD is in the process of issuing surveys to all dental facilities and have received approximately
three-quarters of those back at this time. YVWD will be visiting the dental offices that have not
returned their surveys during the next area survey.
8.4.8 Changes to the SAWPA Pretreatment Program
As FY 2016/17 closed, SAWPA's long-time General Manager retired. In July 2017, SAWPA appointed its
Executive Manager of Engineering and Operations(EMEO)as Interim General Manager to serve as its
chief executive. In September 2017, SAWPA elevated its Interim General Manager to General Manager.
In October 2017, SAWPA split the duties of the EMEO position into two new management positions
(engineering and operations)and filled those new positions with internal candidates. Formerly under
SAWPA's Executive Manager of Engineering and Operations,the SAWPA Pretreatment Program now
operates under SAWPA's Engineering Manager.
SAWPA has continued to refine a new Pretreatment Program developed in 2013. SAWPA staff consists
of a Manager of Permitting and Pretreatment and a Senior Pretreatment Program Specialist, with an
additional 1.6 full-time equivalent consisting of other SAWPA personnel. SAWPA oversees the Brine Line
program with assistance from Pretreatment Program managers, senior management, and inspectors from
the Member and Contract Agencies. A full description of personnel available to the Brine Line program is
detailed in 8.6.11.
8.30
SAWPA created, and filled a new position, Business Analyst, during the reporting period to assist with the
goal of effective data capture, management, and reporting which yields accurate data reporting on a long-
term basis. One of the ongoing duties for this individual will be to audit data entry by SAWPA and Agency
personnel into the SAWPA Data Management System and address any inaccuracies discovered prior to
submittal.
Two working groups made up of 1) Pretreatment Program managers; and 2) managers and senior
management met during the year to coordinate work of the Pretreatment Program team. Working group
meetings are utilized to review Brine Line procedures, discuss upcoming pretreatment issues, and provide
training on various topics related to the program. SAWPA continued an Inter-Agency training program to
promote the continued growth of all agency inspectors. Inspectors from each agency accompany a different
agency on an inspection each quarter to observe inspection practices, but also see new types of facilities,
broadening each inspector's experience.
SAWPA conducted covert downstream monitoring of dischargers where concerns of potential non-
compliance issues were present. Although to date no non-compliance issues have been discovered due
to this sampling, SAWPA will continue the practice in FY 2018/19.
SAWPA will again conduct audits of its member/Contract Agencies in late 2018. During these audits
SAWPA personnel ensure agencies were performing inspection, monitoring, permitting, and enforcement
activities in line with the SAWPA policies and procedures. SAWPA personnel review documentation for
completeness, accuracy, and adherence to SAWPA policies and consistency between agency programs.
SAWPA personnel also accompany agency personnel on inspection and sampling events to observe
techniques and ensure adherence to SAWPA procedures and consistency between agency programs.
During the previous audits of 2016 SAWPA observed no major findings at any of the member or Contract
Agencies.
SAWPA Ordinance No. 8 and Local Limits Resolution 2017.11
OCSD revised and updated the OCSD Ordinance and Local Limits table in February of 2016. As Delegated
Control Authority for the OCSD with regards to the Brine Line, SAWPA is required to have a substantially
similar program to OCSD and therefore is required to update their Ordinance to include the OCSD revisions.
Ordinance No. 8 - An Ordinance of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Establishing Regulations
for the Use of the Inland Empire Brine Line was adopted in September of 2017, which superseded
Ordinance No. 7. Ordinance No. 8 was developed by modifying the current Ordinance No. 7. Changes to
the Ordinance included but are not limited to:The potential maximum issued periods for permits have been
lengthened, discharges causing corrosion,fouling,occlusion,or damage have been prohibited, procedural
reporting and response schedules have been defined for mechanisms of compliance, addition of a new
control mechanism authorizing users to discharge previously unauthorized classes of wastewater,
Ordinance language has been strengthened to prohibit permit transfers triggered by sale or change of
ownership, a new permit type for facilities that have undergone a transfer in ownership, inclusion of a
formula used to adjust the Loral Limits to account for the presence of SAWPA Industrial Non-process
Wastestreams,and Numerous Administrative changes. Furthermore Resolution No.2017-11,A Resolution
of the Commission of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Establishing Local Limits and Best
Management Practices Requirements, superseded Resolution No. 2011-13 in September of 2017. A
technical evaluation required by the Orange County Sanitation District NPDES permit resulted in 11
changes to the Resolution Establishing Local Limits and Best Management Practices Requirements
concentration and mass-based limits.
8.31
SAWPA Draft Pretreatment Proaram Control Documents Submittal
SAWPA Submitted draft updates to the Pretreatment Program Control Documents (PPCDs), also known
as the SAWPA Policy and Procedures,for OCSD's review on April 2, 2018. These documents have been
updated to incorporate OCSD's outstanding comments from their 2013 review of the PPCDs,to incorporate
changes due to SAWPA Ordinance No. 8 and Loral Limits Resolution 2017-11, as well as to incorporate
any program changes SAWPA has made since 2013. In addition, SAWPA utilized this submission to
continue discussions with OCSD on four items; Permit Durations, A Collection Station MOU,The SAWPA
Stormwater Policy, and Permit Templates.
OCSD has lengthened the maximum duration of their permit types in Ordinance No. OCSD-48. SAWPA
has also lengthened these durations in SAWPA Ordinance No. 8. However, SAWPA understands OCSD
has elected to not engage the Regional Board on this topic and therefore is not going to implement the new
durations for Categorical Industrial Users and Significant Industrial Users at this time. OCSD indicated that
the maximum permit durations for Industrial Users/Special Purpose Discharge Permits and Liquid Waste
Haulers could be lengthened as stated in Ordinance No. OCSD-48, as well as SAWPA Ordinance No. 8,
following OCSD approval. SAWPA has incorporated these new maximum permit durations in the draft
PPCDs. With this submittal SAWPA requested to implement the new maximum permit durations for the
Industrial User, Special Purpose Discharge Permit, and Liquid Waste Hauler permit types.
SAWPA has engaged OCSD regarding a potential Memorandum of Understanding(MOU)for operation of
the Brine Line Collection Stations(Collection Stations)as an alternative for a wastewater discharge permit.
As discussed previously the Collection Station is not generating wastewater and is instead merely a
conveyance point for the wastewater discharge. As such, a permit is not an ideal control mechanism for
theiroperation. SAWPA's intent was to employ a MOU with a comesponding Standard Operating Procedure
(SOP) to ensure consistent operation of each Collection Station in accordance with the SAWPA Policies
and Procedures. SAWPA had previously shared the draft Collection Station MOU with OCSD. SAWPA
understands that OCSD wished to withhold any potential concurrence on this document until a template
SOP for the Collection Stations could be reviewed. These documents were submitted alongside the Draft
Pretreatment Program Control Documents submittal on April 2, 2018.
SAWPA has engaged OCSD regarding a potential Stormwater Policy based on the OCSD Business
Washpad Rule. SAWPA's intent was to employ the Policy requiring a SOP for facilities that had potential
to discharge stormwater as outlined in the draft Policy. SAWPA has previously shared the draft Stormwater
Policy with OCSD. SAWPA understands that OCSD wished to withhold any potential concurrence on this
document until a template SOP for the Stormwater Policy could be reviewed. These documents were
submitted alongside the Draft Pretreatment Program Control Documents submittal on April 2, 2018.
SAWPA has also discussed with OCSD the submittal of a new Permit Template for each of SAWPA's permit
types for OCSD concurrence. It is SAWPA's goal to gain concurrence from OCSD on each of our individual
permit templates. This should allow for a more streamlined concurrence process for each permit as the
OCSD review can focus only on the unique language for the individual permittee rather than the standard
language, format, etc. within each template. SAWPA submitted a new draft Liquid Waste Hauler Permit
Template to OCSD on December 4, 2017. As discussed in the December 4, 2017 submittal SAWPA is
continuing to withhold submitting additional templates to OCSD for review until we have received
comments, if any, on the Liquid Waste Hauler Permit template. As the structure and content of each
template is similar,SAWPA will incorporate changes necessary to all of the templates prior to sending them
on for concurrence and receiving the same comments again. To date SAWPA has received no comments
8.32
regarding the Liquid Waste Hauler Permit Template submittal other than to be notified of OCSD's receipt
of the submittal.
SAWPA expects to implement the new Policy and Procedures as outlined above upon finalization of
documents following OCSD review and comment in late 2018. As of June 30, 2018, SAWPA has received
no comment from OCSD on the draft submittal.
8.4.9 Pretreatment Program Budget & Staffing
Eastern Municipal Water District(EMWD)
As of July 1, 2017,the Pretreatment Program staff consisted of 1 manager, 2 analysts, 1 senior inspector,
5 field inspectors, and 1 administrative support personnel for a total of 10 staff members. Traditionally,
EMWD designates 20% of the departmental budget to the Brine Line Pretreatment Program. The total
estimated budget for Brine Line FY 2017118 is$313,140.
Inland Empire Utilities Aaencv(IEUA)
As of July 1,2017, the Pretreatment Program staff consists of 1 manager, 1 supervisor, 1 engineer,4 Feld
inspectors,and 1 administrative support personnel for a total of 8 staff members.The total estimated budget
for FY 2017118 is$180,468. This represents the total estimated budget dedicated to Brine Line activities.
Jurupa Community Services District(JCSD)
As of July 1, 2017,the Pretreatment Program staff consists of 1 supervisor, 2 field inspectors and a sewer
sample technician for a total of 4 staff members. The JCSD Pretreatment Budget for FY 2017118 is
$299,620 for the Brine Line Service Area. The Agency does not differentiate within its budget between
Brine Line and non-Brine Line activities.
San Bernardino Municipal Water Department(SBMWD7
As of July 1, 2017,the Pretreatment Program staff consists of 1 manager, 3 field technicians, 1 collection
station operator, and 1 administrative support personnel for a total of 6 staff members. Total budget for the
entire Pretreatment Program including the brine program for 2017/18 for staff and equipment is$707,014.
The Agency does not differentiate within its budget between Brine Line and non-Brine Line activities.
San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District(Valley District)
As of July 1,2017,the Pretreatment Program staff consists of 1 manager, 1 consultant provided personnel
for a total of 2 staff members. The consulting budget for FY 2017118 was $24,056. Valley District
management time is estimated at approximately 10%of the program implementation budget,or$2,405.60.
The Agency does not track time to differentiate between Brine Line and non-Brine Line activities.
Pretreatment Program sampling and monitoring costs are under a separate contract with Western Municipal
Water District (WMWD) in the amount of about $13,000. Total cost for FY 2017118 was approximately
$37,000.
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority(SAWPA)
As of July 1, 2017,the Pretreatment Program staff consisted of 1 manager and 1 specialist. An additional
1.6 FTE is contributed from 2 engineers, and 3 technical support personnel. The estimated budget for FY
2017/18 was$925,000. Actual Brine Line activity expenditures were$921,787.
8.33
Western Municipal Water District(WMWD)
As of July 1,2017,the Pretreatment Program staff consists of 1 manager, and 2 Source Control Specialists
for a total of 3 staff members. Estimated budget for FY 2017/18 is $300,000 (this figure does not include
sampling costs, which are assigned to the customer as a pass-through charge). The District does not
differentiate within its budget between Brine Line and non-Brine Line activities.
8.4.10 Equipment Inventory Listing
The Summary of Pretreatment Equipment used by and available to SAWPA in Pretreatment Activities,such
as field inspection and sampling activities, is provided in the following tables. The quantities listed in each
Member and Contract Agency table below represents the total resources available for Brine Line activities.
The Member and Contract Agencies do not track time to differentiate between Brine Line and non-Brine
Line activities or resource allocations. A summary of the pretreatment equipment used by the dischargers
is shown in Appendix H titled"SAWPA Pretreatment Program Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment".
TABLE 8.4 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority—Summary of Pretreatment Equipment
for Fiscal Year 2017118
Equipment Quantity
Description EMWD IEUA JCSD SBMWD SAWPA WMWD
Vehicles 7 4 4 4 2 8
Automated Samplers 11 16 8 14 5 14
Handheld Portable 3
Samplers
Sampler Batteries 24 19 24 6 8
Sampler Battery 12 12 - 10 5 2
Chargers
Sampler Batter Power 1
Packs
Portable Area/Velocity _ 5 6 1 - -
Flow Meters
Gas Meters/Detectors 6 4 - 3 1 2
with Pumps
Laboratory Dishwashers - 1 1 - - -
Ice Machines - 1 2 - - -
Portable pH Meters - 8 2 4 1 7
Sulfide Test Kits - 7 - 1 -
SONDE Trunk Line 4 -
Monitoring Devices
Laptop Computers - 4 1 - 2 -
Continuous 112S Trunk 2
Line Monitoring Devices
Spill Response Kits - - - 3 - -
8.4.11 SAWPA Pretreatment Program Training
SAWPA, EMWD, IEUA, WMWD, SBMWD, Valley District, and JCSD staff attended training classes and
workshops presented by the California Water Environment Association (CWEA), including the P3S
conference, and Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works (SCAP) pretreatment
committee meetings.
8.34
Inter-Agency training was conducted each quarter throughout the 2017/2018 fiscal year to promote the
continued growth of all agency inspectors. Inspectors from each agency accompany a different agency on
an inspection each quarter to observe inspection practices, but also see new types of facilities, broadening
each inspectors experience.
Additional training was conducted throughout the 2017/2018 fiscal year by SAWPA for member/Contract
Agencies. The following training classes were conducted with all SAWPA agencies represented:
• SAWPA Due Dates Training—July 21, 2017
• SAWPA Liquid Cremation Roundtable Discussion—December 12, 2017
• SAWPA OERP Training—January 17, 2018
• SAWPA iPACS Refresher Workshop—January 18, 2018
• SAWPA new personnel iPACS Training—April 19, 2018
• SAWPA FACS Refresher Training—May 17, 2018
8.35
chapter 9
SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Introduction
Biosolids Quality
chapter
SOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
9.1 INTRODUCTION
This section provides an overview of OCSD's Biosolids Program, focusing on the biosolids quality with
respect to metals. Biosolids are nutrient-rich, treated organic matter recovered through the treatment of
wastewater. These solids are considered a resource because of their nutrient and energy values, and
they are recyclable in part because of their low metal content. The pretreatment program is a key
element in ensuring the recyclability of OCSD's biosolids by minimizing the discharge of heavy metals
and other undesirable constituents into the collection system and ultimately the treated solids,which are
used to fertilize farms.
OCSD's annual biosolids compliance report was completed, submitted to regulators, and posted online
in February.Visit OCSD.com/503 to access the most recent document that contains Biosolids Program
information, regulations, quantities, policies, guiding principles, and how and where biosolids are
recycled.
9.2 BIOSOLIDS QUALITY
Biosolids quality plays an important role in ensuring the continued recyclability of OCSD's biosolids.
OCSD's pretreatment program has been extremely effective in reducing and maintaining levels of
pollutants (e.g., OCSD's influent sewage meets drinking water standards for the biosolids monitoring
metals). The ceiling concentrations and EQ (exceptional quality) concentrations promulgated by the
EPA's biosolids regulations(40 CFR 503)are presented in the figures as a reference. For FY 2017/18,
OCSD biosolids met the EQ limits for all the regulated parameters.
TABLE 9.1 Trends In Trace Metal Content of Blosollds, Fiscal Years 2009-2018
(Concentration In mg/kg, dry weight)
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg Min. Max Avg.
Arsenic 41
2008-09 4.3 12 7.1 3.5 13 9.0
2009-10 2.0 10 5.2 4.4 10 7.2
2010-11 7.2 9.7 8.4 8.6 12 10
2011-12 2.3 11 7.4 6.6 66 22
2012-13 0 7.8 4.7 2.0 10 7.0
2013-14* 3.5 9.5 5.8 5.4 11 8.4
2014-15 4.5 11 7.2 7.8 12 9.3
2015-16* 6.3 12 8.3 6.2 12 9.2
2016-17* 6.7 12 8.1 5.6 12 8.6
2017-18* 7.2 16 9.9 7.9 16 11
9.1
TABLE 9.1 Trends in Trace Metal Content of Biosolids, Fiscal Years 2009-2018
(Concentration in mg/kg, dry weight)
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Cadmium 39
2008-09 2.5 6.2 4.1 1.7 4.4 3.0
2009-10 1.1 4.4 2.9 1.0 4.8 2.8
2010-11 1.2 3.8 2.6 1.4 5.0 2.5
2011-12 0.8 6.0 3.8 1.1 4.4 3.6
2012-13 2.6 7.8 4.7 1.9 4.4 3.1
2013-14* 1.6 11 3.9 2.1 6.0 3.5
2014-15 2.7 7.8 5.1 3.1 5.8 4.0
2015-16* 1.3 4.7 2.5 2.0 4.5 3.0
2016-17 2.6 3.1 2.3 2.0 3.8 3.0
2017-18* 1.7 4.4 3.0 2.5 7.7 5.1
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Chromium *'
2008-09 44 65 55 42 88 62.3
2009-10 29 56 44 30 54 47
2010-11 41 58 47 50 66 59
2011-12 42 74 52 40 70 56
2012-13 42 56 49 42 59 49
2013-14 39 52 45 40 53 46
2014-15 30 51 40 34 70 46
2015-16 31 89 46 28 60 46
2016-17 30 89 49 29 67 46
2017-18 27 38 34 38 54 44
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Copper 1,500
2008-09 500 590 560 500 540 520
2009-10 420 620 540 370 560 500
2010-11 520 600 570 500 720 570
2011-12 430 670 520 380 720 520
2012-13 480 640 540 500 640 540
2013-14 460 540 510 470 540 500
2014-15 320 570 470 320 560 470
2015-16 380 560 460 340 570 480
2016-17 400 560 460 340 570 490
2017-18 320 500 420 380 590 460
9.2
TABLE 9.1 Trends in Trace Metal Content of Biosolids, Fiscal Years 2009-2018
(Concentration in mg/kg, dry weight)
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Lead 300
2008-09 11 25 21 6.0 21 15
2009-10 9.0 44 23 9.0 20 17
2010-11 21 24 23 9.0 30 20
2011-12 ND 25 9.0 ND 32 13
2012-13 7.5 19 15 7.5 17 14
2013-14* 13 17.5 14 13 17 14
2014-15* 8.7 15 13 9.0 17 13
2015-16* 8.3 20 12 8.0 17 13
2016-17* 7.9 20 11 7.5 17 12
2017-18* 8.9 19 12 10 16 13
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Mercury 17
2008-09 1.0 1.9 1.4 1.0 2.6 1.4
2009-10 1.0 3.2 1.4 0.9 1.6 1.3
2010-11 0.8 2.2 1.3 0.8 2.3 1.2
2011-12 0.8 1.4 1.2 0.8 2.6 1.3
2012-13 0.7 4.1 1.5 0.8 3.8 1.4
2013-14 0.8 1.2 1.0 0.7 2.8 1.4
2014-15 1.0 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.5 1.0
2015-16 0.6 1.7 0.93 0.64 1.2 1.0
2016-17 0.53 1.7 0.90 0.70 1.2 0.90
2017-18 0.66 1.1 0.85 0.34 1.1 0.79
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Molybdenum "
2008-09 12 16 15 8.0 16 14
2009-10 6.0 16 13 6.0 14 10
2010-11 12 19 15 4.8 18 14
2011-12 6.5 18 13 12 20 17
2012-13 9.8 20 14 12 20 15
2013-14 12 18 15 14 18 15
2014-15 9.4 18 15 12 20 16
2015-16* 11 18 15 11 23 16
2016-17 12 18 15 11 23 16
2017-18' 10 16 14 13 18 15
9.3
TABLE 9.1 Trends in Trace Metal Content of Biosolids, Fiscal Years 2009-2018
(Concentration in mg/kg, dry weight)
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Nickel 420
2008-09 30 41 35 22 37 29
2009-10 12 36 28 9 27 21
2010-11 28 46 37 14 38 32
2011-12 15 48 35 20 39 31
2012-13 34 48 40 23 41 30
2013-14 36 55 43 28 56 37
2014-15 26 47 37 26 41 34
2015-16* 29 45 38 20 41 33
2016-17 25 45 36 21 41 32
2017-18 28 37 32 31 39 34
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Selenium 100
2008-09 2.5 14 9.7 2.8 13 7.5
2009-10 2.7 18 7.3 2.8 16 5.6
2010-11 2.8 26 11 3.7 26 9.8
2011-12 ND 26 9.0 ND 19 9.0
2012-13 0 20 9.0 0 20 8.0
2013-14* 3.5 13 7.9 4.2 13 8.3
2014-15* 4.1 13 7.1 4.5 15 7.3
2015-16* 4.4 11 8.1 3.7 10 7.6
2016-17* 4.1 10 8.4 4.8 10 8.0
2017-18* 3.0 7.8 4.9 2.7 8.0 4.9
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Silver
2008-09 19 24 21 9.5 13 12
2009-10 10 18 15 7.4 13 10
2010-11 10 17 13 5.2 12 9.6
2011-12 7 14 10 4.0 12 8.5
2012-13 6.2 14 8.6 6.4 13 8.6
2013-14 1.7 7.6 5.7 3.8 9.1 7.0
2014-15 4.9 7.8 6.7 6.0 8.6 7.0
2015-16 4.6 7.7 6.1 4.2 8.0 6.0
2016-17 3.6 7.7 5.7 4.3 7.9 5.7
2017-18 2.4 5.5 4.0 2.8 5.7 4.2
9.4
TABLE 9.1 Trends in Trace Metal Content of Biosolids, Fiscal Years 2009-2018
(Concentration in mg/kg, dry weight)
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Exceptional Plant 1 Plant 2
Fiscal Quality
Metal Year Limits Min. Max. Avg. Min. Max. Avg.
Zinc 2,800
2008-09 720 870 790 700 800 750
2009-10 560 810 740 520 790 710
2010-11 630 740 700 700 830 740
2011-12 560 880 710 560 910 750
2012-13 640 860 720 680 880 770
2013-14 590 730 670 620 750 700
2014-15 420 720 620 470 740 670
2015-16 500 770 620 520 890 730
2016-17 550 770 610 520 890 740
2017-18 470 680 600 590 910 720
Calculations included data below the reporting limit, but above the method detection limit, and were
therefore flagged as"detected not quantified"
9.5
80
Anenk
—Main No I �F ntNe.2 ----- hit
60 Enaplional OuaLry EPA fficeo FPWlanl
Lbncelnrnion LLmn 39 IN,(Fab.1003).
41 mpg(1998)
40 i ____________
m
9 30
I
k
9
20
Comentra5on less Nan memod aetechon
limit of 59 MVkg limit in 1993
10
0
1993 1958 2003 2008 2013 2018
Figure 9-1 Trends in Concentrations of Arsenic in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1993-2018
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
as
Cadmium
—PInINo.t PlntNo.2 -----Lini
40 ________________________________ Exceptional Quaky EPA eibsbi,u PNueent
CPMemmllon Limit
39 men,(Feb.1883)
35
30
m
9 25
1
k 20
9
15
10
5
0
1993 19w 2003 2008 2013 2018
Figure 9-2 Trends in Concentrations of Cadmium in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1993-2018
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
9.6
730
Cltmmlum
—PIMNo.1 —Pla,I Not
mere One no eioeolim I mi s for<hrommm
600
A.f0
m
0
k
0 300
100
0
1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018
Figure 9-3 Trends in Concentrations of Chromium in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1993-2018
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
2000
Copper
—PI.INe.1 —PISI No --Lime
1800
EeCepNenal Oualiry EPA Bmeolds Pdlular,.
Co%enoahonL I
1600 IWO mpM9(Feb.1993)
.................................
1400
1200
m
9 I 1000
k
9 eoo
600
400
200
0
1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018
Figure 9-4 Trends in Concentrations of Copper in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1993-2018
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
9.7
500
LWA
—PlnINo l —PInlNo.2 -----Lend
Exceptional quality EPA elwdiu,
400 Poll n. Con bilrid on Llmil
NO, g(Feb.IBW)
In
300
9
1
k
9 We
100
0
1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018
Figure 9-5 Trends in Concentrations of Lead in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1993-2018
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
eo
Mercury —Meet No.1 —Plant No -----Lena
35
Exceptional quale/EPA spedga Ppaunnt
Cmentnllm L..
30 17 Al(Fli 19191)
25
m
9 20
t
k -------------------------------
9 15
10
5
0
1393 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018
Figure 9-6 Trends in Concentrations of Mercury in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1993-2018
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
9.8
80
8101ybdenum
R.,NO.t —R.INo.2 --"'--C.Imp
10 No Exceptional Ouaiiry EPA BiaaOiiaa POWIam
COMenV al�On Lurvt
Ceding Concemmlan]s MW4(Feb.19W)
60
6D
In
9
1 40
k
9 30
20
10
0
1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2010
Figure 9.7 Trends in Concentrations of Molybdenum in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1993-2018
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
450 Niel
—Rant No.l �PlmilNo.R ---^LMe
400
icmeemptial ematw Limit
Bbe,ithe Limit M
earaMMbn Llmil 3) Cailirp Limit
020 myke(Feb.t99J)
390
300
In
9 250
1
k 200
9
100
100
00
0
1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018
Figure 9-8 Trends in Concentrations of Nickel in Biosolids, Fiscal Years, 1993-2018
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
99
110
selonkil
—Flans Ni, 1 —Planl No.3 -Line
100 -
Eace,emnalOwLly EPA Bimonds Pollulanl
Cosmmin.W Limn 6 Cahny CPncenl al,on
00 100 m¢ny
00
10
In
9 e0
k so
40
g Concemranon less man memM detection llmie
30 83=g limit in t993
20
10
0
1883 1888 2003 2008 2013 2018
Figure 9-9 Trends in Concentrations of Selenium in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1993-2018
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
4000 -
zm
—PIenl No.t �PImINo.2 --•••LYn1
3500 EaceaticwI GA&W EPA BiwWNPPFNnt
Concmbasion L1mil
28wmpMp lF" IBBJI
3000
-------------------------------
2500
In
9
1 2000
it
9
1500
1000
500
0 .
1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018
Figure 9-10 Trends in Concentrations of Zinc in Biosolids, Fiscal Years 1993-2018
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
9.10
chapter 10
NON-INDUSTRIAL SOURCE CONTROL AND
PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAMS
Introduction
Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) Control Programs
Radiator Shops
Dry Cleaners
Urban Runoff
Dental Amalgam
Public Education
chapter 10
NON-INDUSTRIAL SOURCE CONTROL AND PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAMS
10.1 INTRODUCTION
In response to regulatory requirements in support of water reuse through the Orange County Sanitation District's
(OCSD)partnership with Orange County Water District's(OCW D)Groundwater Replenishment System(GW RS),as
well as concerns regarding pollutants which pose potential Impacts to OCSD's collection system,treatment works,
personnel, biosolids, NPDES discharge, or which aid diversion of Urban Runoff to OCSD's treatment facilities,
OCSD's Pretreatment Program was expanded to include non-industrial sources. A list of the non-industrial
programs are listed in Table 10.1.
TABLE 10.1 Non-Industrial Programs, FY 2017/18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Programs
Fats, Oils, and Grease Control
Radiator Shops
Dry Cleaners
Urban Runoff
Dental Amalgam
10.2 FATS, OILS, AND GREASE (FOG) CONTROL PROGRAMS
10.2.1 Fats, Oils, and Grease Control
Background
A frequent cause of Sanitary Sewer Overflows(SSOs)is grease accumulation in the small-to medium-sized sewer
lines typically owned and operated by the cities and local sewering agencies. In April 2002,the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region (RWQCB) issued Order No. R8-2002-0014, General Waste
Discharge Requirements(W DR),which required Orange County cities and severing agencies,known as WDR Co-
Permittees,to monitor and control SSOs. Specifically,the order required WDR Co-Permittees to develop a Sewer
System Management Plan (SSMP),one element of which was a Fats,Oils,and Grease(FOG)Control Program
(FOG program). On November 17.2004,OCSD passed FOG Ordinance OCSD-25 establishing the legal au hority
to prohibit food service establishments(FSEs)from discharging FOG to the sewer system, and implemented its
FOG program for FSEs in its direct service area on January 1,2005.
In May 2006,the State Water Resources Control Board(SW RCB)adopted Statewide General Waste Discharge
Requirements for SandarySewerSystems,Water Quality Order No.2006-0003(Statewide WDR),which required a
similar effort statewide. In December 2006,the RWQCB rescinded its WDR in lieu of the Statewide WDR. OCSD
submitted its SSMP to the SW RCB in May 2009. OCSD completed its most recent audit of the SSMP in May 2017.
More specifics on the county-wide FOG program can be found in Chapter VIII of the SSMP. The following sections
detail OCSD's FOG control efforts in FY 2017/18.
10.1
Prooram Administration
The Commercial FOG program is administered through a combination of permitting,inspection,compliance
tracking, report monitoring, and enforcement. The main elements of the FOG program include:
1) Ordinance OCSD-25-Fats,Oils,and Grease Ordinance for Food Service Establishments;
2) FOG Wastewater Discharge Permittodefine and communicate permittees'responsibilities regarding
FOG discharges;
3) Required Best Management Practices(BMPs)to minimize FOG-bearing wastewater discharges;
4) Installation and/or required maintenance of grease interceptors (G.I.$),when applicable;
5) Semi-annual monitoring of BMP implementation and G.I. maintenance;
6) Screening and evaluation of all inspection and monitoring reports to identify violations and/or
deficiencies;
7) Inspection of FSE facilities to verify compliance; and
8) Enforcement Response Plan to respond to violations in a consistent and timely manner.
Permdtinc
During the initial phases of the program,OCSD conducted an examination of the FOG trouble spots,as well
as an inspection of the FSEs in the service area to collect operational information. A scheme was developed
to categorize the distinct types of facilities based upon their potential to discharge FOG,the need to enforce
the regulatory requirements of the FOG Ordinance,and the potential of each FSE to impact known or potential
trouble spots. Using the combination of inspection data and trouble spot information,FSEs were categorized
into the following six groups:
Category 1 -FSEs with a G.I. installed.
Category 2 - FSEs without a G.I. installed, that are a significant contributor to a FOG trouble spot and
probably need to install a G.I. due to their FOG impact to the sewer.
Category 3 - FSEs without a G.I. installed, that are considered a less significant contributor to a FOG
trouble spot but may still need to install a G.I. in the future due to their proximity.
Category 4- FSEs without a G.I. installed,that are not considered a significant contributor of FOG,are
not upstream of a trouble spot, and probably will not need a G.I. installed.
Category 5 -FSEs found to be an insignificant source of FOG that will not be required to have a permit.
Category 6-Commercial property owners that maintain a G.I.common to multiple FSEs.
After creating the six categories and examining the FSEs'operations and discharge configurations,it became
obvious that there needed to be different FOG Wastewater Discharge Permit(permit)alternatives to cover the
various conditions encountered. The six categories eventually produced three permit variations. The first
permit,Type 1,covers FSEs that have FOG pretreatment,typically considered to be a below-ground G.I. The
second variety,Type 2,is issued to FSEs without pretreatment,categories 2,3,and 4. Type 2 perm its need
to include a Conditional Waiver from the FOG pretreatment requirement,as mandated for all FSEs by OCSD's
FOG Ordinance. The third permit variation,Type 6,was developed for the strip mall or food court owners who
have several FSEs plumbed to a common G.I. The Type 6 permit only requires G.I.maintenance and does
not include any BMP requirements. The individual FSEs connected to the common interceptor at a Type 6
location are still issued a Type 2 permit that requires BMP implementation.
Perm its are currently issued for two-year terms. Prior to permit renewal,the FSE is required to complete and
submit an updated permit application and pay the permit application fee. Ownership changes also trigger a
permit re-issuance as the permit is non-transferable.
10.2
Table 10.2 reflects the current number of FSEs in OCSD's direct service area.
TABLE 10.2 FSE Count by Category, FY 2017/18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
FSEs by Category Count
Category 1 -G.I. installed 15
Category 2-No G.I. but contributing to a trouble spot 0
Category 3-No G.I. and not a significant contributor to a trouble spot 6
Category 4-Not a significant FOG source, no G.I. required at this time 18
Category 5-Insignificant FOG discharger,not permitted 18
Category 6-Property owner maintains a shared G.I. 0
Total FSE9 in OCSD Program(Categories 1.6) 67
Self-Monitorino Report
As a condition of the FOG permits, FSEs are required to implement the BMPs, maintain their G.I.s if
applicable,keep records/logs of employee training and yellow grease disposal,and submit periodic monitoring
reports to inform OCSD of their BMP efforts and G.I.maintenance activities. Submitted reports are evaluated
and used to determine compliance.
Table 10.3 summarizes the BMP and G.I. monitoring compliance for the annual reporting period. The
software problem that resulted in a series of reports not being generated, detailed during the previous
reporting period,has been resolved. The results for the period July 1,2017 through June 30,2018,now show
100%of the BMP reports being received and 96%of the G.I.Maintenance reports being received. The 96%
result being due to the receipt of a single G.I.report with deficient data. Staff is currently working with the FSE
to correct the data.
TABLE 10.3 FSE Monitoring Reports,FY 2017/18
Orange County Sanitation District,Resource Protection Division
FSEs by Category Issued Received Percent Received
BMPs Monitoring Reports 73 73 100%
G.I. Monitoring Reports 24 23 96%
Inspection
Regular FSE inspections are an integral and essential part of the FOG program, because they serve as a
regulatory reminder to implement the required BMPs, and for FSEs with G.l.s to maintain their FOG
pretreatment devices. Every inspection event presents an opportunity to provide educational outreach to the
FSE community by further reinforcing the importance of the kitchen BMPs and strengthening the cooperative
effort ultimately needed to effectively control FOG discharges to the sewer. The FOG program initially
included two distinct types of inspections, 1) a kitchen inspection geared toward the BMPs, and 2) a G.I.
inspection to verify that G.l.s are periodically pumped out and in compliance with the 25% rule (initial
inspections historically conducted by a private contractor). With the transfer of the local sewers to EOCWD,
the number of FOG perm idees has fallen to 39,with 15 of those establishments having a G.I. installed. As a
result, OCSD has eliminated the private contractor in favor of OCSD staff inspections and Orange County
Health Care Agency (OCHCA) BMP Inspections. Monitoring for G.I. maintenance is now primarily done
through the Semi-Annual G.1. Wastehauling Report submittals.
10.3
Violation of a permit requirement or a provision of the FOG Ordinance, or the failure to submit a required
report can lead to issuance of a Corrective Action Notice(CAN). The CAN is followed by a Notice of Violation
which includes the assessment of noncompliance fees if the deficiency is not corrected in a timely manner.
Table 10.4 summarizes the BMP and G.I. inspection activity, the number of CANS issued, as well as the
official compliance and inventory management visits.
TABLE 10.4 FSE Compliance Inspection Activities, FY 2017/18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Actions Taken Count
BMPs Ins actions` 35
G.I. Inspections 0
CANS issued _ 17
Compliance Follow-Up Inspections' 21
Notice of Violations issued 0
OCHCA FOG Ins ions` 48
Deficient BMPs/G.I. Monitoring Report Inspection* 2
Late BMPs/G.I. Monitoring Report Submittal Inspection* 14
Late Permit Application Renewal Submittal Inspection* 2
FSE Inventory Management Ins ection'^ 9
Total Actions Taken 148
Conducted by OCSD Staff;
®Conducted by Private Contractor;
Conducted by OCHCA;
Total includes 6 inspections conducted for CANS issued during the prior reporting period(2 Inspections pending);
Total includes 4 FOG Program Orientations.
FOG Program Effectiveness
Monitoring the effectiveness of the FOG program enables OCSD to refine its program implementation as
necessary to comply with its requirement to eliminate preventable SSOs. OCSD uses a geographic
information system (GIS) to analyze the relationship between trouble spots, FSEs, and SSOs. Areas of
concern are evaluated and prioritized based on the impact of FSE proximity,tributary residential density,and
FOG accumulation in the sewer line, as determined by both CCTV and field crew observations. OCSD
coordinates with the Collection Facilities staff to maintain an effective Commercial FOG program by keeping
trouble spots under surveillance and following up on grease accumulations before they reach a critical stage.
Table 10.5 summarizes the SSO data from the past two reporting periods. This data demonstrates the
effectiveness of the FOG program at reducing the frequency of SSO events.
TABLE 10.5 FOG Program Effectiveness, FY 2017/18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Spills FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18
OCSD system spills attributable to FSE FOG 0 0
OCSD system spills attributable to residential FOG 0 0
Private laterals ills attributable to FOG 0 0
Total FOG-related Spills 0 0
10.4
10.3 RADIATOR SHOPS
The Radiator Shop Certification Program aims to prevent heavy metal-bearing liquids,oil and grease,spent
antifreeze/coo tint,as well as any other hazardous wastes from being discharged to the sewer. The program
requires shops that rebuild and repair radiators to biennially certify the following:
• No industrial wastewater or spent antifreeze/coolant is discharged to the sewer,
• Floor drains are permanently sealed and secured from spills or accidental discharges,
• Water recycling systems are close-looped with no connection to the sewer,and
• Wastehauling records are maintained on-site and available for review upon request
Twenty notification letters,which contained certification forms,were mailed in October 2017. At the end of the
reporting period, 15 shops submitted certification forms. OCSD staff conducted audit inspections in January,
February,and March of 2018 to verify information in the submitted certifications. The follow-up inspections
went well, and no new owners were encountered. The inspections serve not only to check wastehauling
records and waste management practices,but also to provide an opportunity to educate the shop owners on
the OCW D GW RS and OCSD's other reclamation efforts. The personal interaction between the shop owners
and OCSD staff reinforces the concept that their facill waste management efforts are contributing to both
high-quality drinking water, as well as a clean environment.
The four facilities that hadn't returned their certification forms, A-A Auto Service in Fullerton, Brea Brake 6
Radiator in Brea,Orange County Radiator in Santa Ana,and Orange Radiator in Orange,were all determined
to be out of business (OOB). A drive by was conducted of the industrial park where the owner of Hal's
Radiator had moved his belongings two years ago. There was still no sign of a functioning radiator repair
business,so Hal's Radiator will be placed on the COB list,and no further follow-up is planned. No new repair
facilities were discovered since the previous certification cycle setting the current facility count at 15.
The next certification cycle is scheduled for October 2019. Table 10.6 summarizes the 2017/18 certification
activity.
TABLE 10.6 Radiator Shops Program, FY 2017/18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Activity Count
Notification letter/certification forms sent 20
Cal!cations submitted 15
Audit inspections conducted 20
Shops listed as COB during FY 2017/18 5-
Active shops not returning a certification 0
A-A Auto Service(Fullerton),Brea Brake a Radiator(Brea),Orange County Radiator(Santa Ana),Orange Radiator
(Orange),and Hal's Radiator(Anaheim)
10.4 DRY CLEANERS
Initially implemented to prevent soil and groundwater contamination by perchlorcethylene(Pert)exfiltration
from sewers,the Dry Cleaner Certification Program is now revitalized as an important outreach tool to help
protect the OCW D GW RS. The program tracks the solvent usage and facility ownership within the dry cleaner
Community to prevent the discharge of solvent-containing wastes from dry cleaning operations. Rather than
just examining the spent solvent disposal,additional emphasis is placed on the contaminated water from the
10.5
solvent/water separator,which is typically managed either by wastehauling off-site or by performing on-site
evaporation. The program requires dry cleaning establishments to annually certify the following:
1) No waste solvent is discharged to the sewer,
2) Dry cleaning machines and auxiliary equipment are not connected to the sewer,
3) Floor drains are secured from spills and accidental discharges,
4) Solvent waste is wastehauled off-site for disposal in accordance with all applicable laws, and
5) Solvent contaminated separator water is wastehauled and/or evaporated.
TABLE 10.7 Dry Cleaner Inventory, FY 2017/18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Type of Facilities Count
Perc Facilities 51
Hydrocarbon (Petroleum) Facilities 169
Green Earth(135-Siloxane)Facilities 29
KTEX Facilities 2
Solvon K4 Facilities 2
Facility uses Solvon K4, Hydrocarbon,and Green Parch 1
Facility uses Solvon K4 and Hydrocarbon 1
Garment collection facilities(dry cleaning equipment is still on-site)` 10
Total Facilities 265
'Garment collection facilities with dry cleaning equipment on site receive a certification form to track whether the tacilily
reinstitutes the processing of garments.
Table 10.7 summarizes the number of facilities using each of the various cleaning solvent types.
Certifications are mailed to every dry-cleaning facility at the beginning of the annual cycle. After the completed
certifications are returned, audit inspections are conducted to verity the information. Dry cleaning facilities
must maintain their wastehauling records on site and make them available for review during inspection.
Although all active facilities and garment collection facilities with equipment on-site receive a certification form,
only Perc users are currently inspected by OCSD. OCSD completed 51 Perc facility inspections during this
reporting period, down from 61 the previous cycle.
The number of Perc facilities decreased by ten by the end of the FY 2017/18,the result of four facilities going
COB,four switching to an alternative solvent, and two switching to non-operating agency status. Solvon K4
users remained steady at four,including the two facilities with multiple machines and solvents. There was a
decrease of four Green Earth facilities. Hydrocarbon facilities increased by one overall despite eight users in
this solvent category going COB. The garment collection facilities,also known as agencies,increased by two
as these previously operating facilities ceased using their equipment. Agency facilities are kept in the
certification program until the dry-cleaning equipment is permanently removed from the site. One COB facility
moved to an existing dry cleaner creating a change in ownership at that location. There were 12 additional
facility ownership changes reported during the FY 2017/18 certification cycle,but no new facilities were found.
10.6
Table 10.8 summarizes the dry cleaner certification and inspection activities.
TABLE 10.8 Dry Cleaner Certification Activity,FY 2017118
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Activity Count
Notification letters/certifications sent 279
Certifications submitted 264
Perc facility inspections conducted 51
Certification inspections conducted 61
Facilities listed as OOB during FY 2017/18 14
Operating facilities not returning a certification form 3
Changes incorporated into the certification form for the FY 2015/16 cycle improved the responses on the"floor
drain and sink information"section of the form. However,one of the listed methods for securing the floor
drains from spills"Covered with secure lid,hard plumbed,or plugged"still presented a challenge for the dry
cleaner respondents to answer correctly. That choice on the form was eliminated from the options on the FY
2016/17 certification form. The form still contained "Bermed'; "Raised above floor"; and "By location -
segregated from wet processing and chemical storage areas"as acceptable options for securing the drains.
Although these changes improved the data collection over previous versions of the certification form,staff still
conducted sixty-one certification inspections to clarify missing or incomplete information on the submitted
forms or to collect certifications that were not submitted. This represents 22% of the dry cleaners in the
program.
At the end of this reporting period report,three operating dry-cleaning facilities failed to submit a Certification
of Zero Discharge for FY 2017/18: Royal Cleaners-Cert.#350-0695,Paradise Cleaners-Cert.#360-0695,
and Paradise Cleaners-Carl.#609-1109. Several attempts to personally contact the facility owners to get the
certification returned were unsuccessful as they are not normally on-site,and the facility managers or counter
clerks either didn't have the owners phone number or wouldn't provide it to OCSD staff. Since this is not a
regulatory mandated program, no enforcement activity is planned;however, extra effort to contact the legal
owners of these facilities will be made during the next certification cycle.
10.5 URBAN RUNOFF
OCSD accepts the diversion of urban runoff to the sewer for treatment to remediate various public health and
environmental issues which are impractical to control through traditional stormwater BMPs. Urban runoff is
water that is generated by daily activities such as lawn irrigation,hosing down sidewalks,and car washing. As
the water flows across the urban landscapes and through the storm drain system, it becomes contaminated
with nutrients,pesticides,heavy metals,toxic chemicals,bacteria,and viruses. Once the contaminated water
reaches our creeks, rivers, and shoreline, the pollutants carry the potential to harm wildlife and native
vegetation, spoil recreational opportunities,and even cause human illness through contact with recreational
waters.
Investigation into the bacterial contamination along the Huntington Beach shoreline in 1999 suggested that,
dry weather urban runoff flowing into the ocean from the surrounding watersheds may have caused or
contributed to the resulting beach closures. Recognizing that County beaches were being affected by pollution
carried by urban runoff,the OCSD Board of Directors adopted a series of resolutions agreeing to accept dry
weather urban runoff into the sewer system. Resolution No.01-07, adopted March 28,2001,declared that
OCSD will initially waive fees and charges associated with authorized discharges of dry weather urban runoff
to the sewer system until the total volume of all runoff discharges exceeds 4 million gallons per day(MGD)
calculated on a monthly average. In June 2002,Assembly Bill(AB) 1892 amended OCSD's charter to formally
allow the diversion and management of dry weather urban runoff flows. For the first 12 years of the Urban
10.7
Runoff Program,the average monthly flow averages remained less than the 4 MGD threshold,thus avoiding
user fee costs being assessed to the diversion permittees. In 2012, OCSD received several diversion
proposals to deal with bacteria,nitrogen,and selenium loading to the upper Newport Bay. The discharge from
the additional proposed diversions combined with the existing diversion flows would eventually exceed thefee
threshold. On June 12, 2013, the Board of Directors adopted Urban Runoff Resolution No. 13-09 which
expanded the waiver of fees or charges on the treatment of dry weather urban runoff from 4 MGD to 10 MGD.
This latest policy opened the door to additional flows to help remediate other environmental problems,
including the excessive loading in the upper Newport Bay Watershed. The latest resolution's adoption once
again demonstrated OCSD's commitment to protecting public health and the environment.
Under Resolution No. 13-09, the cities or agencies are authorized to divert a maximum of 10 MGD for all
permitted urban runoff diversions combined. OCSD continues to work closely with Orange County
Watersheds, the lead agency that coordinates the cities' efforts in implementing the Water Quality
Management Plan required by the County of Orange's NPDES permit. Before a diversion is implemented,the
proposed project is presented to OC Watersheds'Technical Advisory Committee. The committee evaluates
the proposal,and, if approved,puts the diversion on their Dry Weather Diversion Priority List. This approval
step ensures that the program's limited capacity is effectively utilized to improve coastal water quality.
Once OC Watersheds accepts a new diversion proposal, OCSD will initiate an Agreement for Dry Weather
Urban Runoff Discharge with the responsible entity. The agreement cites the reasons that the discharge is
being accepted and details the responsibilities of the entity,or agency,that will be maintaining and operating
the diversion. The agreement stipulates that the quality and quantity of the Dry Weather Urban Runoff from
the Drainage Area shall meet all terms, conditions, and discharge limits contained in OCSD's Wastewater
Discharge Regulations.
In addition to the agreement,the Resource Protection Division administers the Urban Runoff Program through
the issuance of a discharge permit for each of the diversion structures. The permit establishes discharge
limits,constituent monitoring,and flow metering requirements,as well as provides guidelines that specifically
prohibit storm runoff,thus authorizing discharge only during periods of dry weather.
10.5.1 Dry Weather Diversion Systems and Urban Runoff Flow
The Mid Big Canyon Diversion in the City of Newport Beach became the latest addition to OCSD's Urban
Runoff Program with permit issuance effective August 8, 2017. Currently there are 21 active urban runoff
diversion structures,3 owned and operated by the County of Orange, 11 owned and operated by the City of
Huntington Beach,3 owned and operated by the City of Newport Beach,3 owned and operated by the Irvine
Ranch Water District (IRWD), and 1 owned and operated by PH Finance,who is the present owner of the
Pelican Hill Resort.
Table 10.9 shows the range of monthly diversion discharges and the total discharge over the past six years.
TABLE 10.9 Dry Weather Urban Runoff Discharges, FY 2012/13-2017/18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
July through June Gallons Discharged Monthly Average
(MG) Flow Range MGD
2012-2013 516 0.004 to 2.69
2013-2014 386 0.59 to 1.72
2014-2015 412 0.71 to 1.49
2015-2016 262 0.32 to 1.21
2016-2017 369 0.18 to 1.58
11 2017-2018 461 0.29 to 1.90
10.8
The downward trend inflow volume during the four-year period from 2012 to 2016,likely due to the extended
dry spell and the Army Corps of Engineers possibly retaining more water behind Prado Dam during the
drought, took a slight respite for the second year in a row. Based upon 2017/18 monthly flow reports, the
diversions cumulatively discharged 461 million gallons (MG) of urban runoff, averaging 1.66 MGD with a
monthly flow range between 0.29 and 1.90 MGD. Overall,urban runoff diversion flows increased 92 MG over
the previous reporting period.
Flows for the eleven City of Huntington Beach diversions trended down 38.9 MG over FY 2016/17 totals.
Flows for the three active Orange County Public Works(OCPW)diversions, Huntington Beach, Greenville
Channel,and Santa Ana River,increased 23.7 MG despite the Santa Ana River Diversion decreasing nearly
9.0 MG from the previous report period. The Greenville Channel continued to divert flow to the Fairview Park
wetlands in the City of Costa Mesa in FY 2017/18,except for the month of June,when a pump test diverted
7.4 MG to OCSD. The flow from the three IRWD diversions, Muddy Canyon, Los Trani Canyon, and
Peters Canyon,increased 98.6 MG overall,with the Peters Canyon Diversion contributing a majority 67.2 MG
to the increase. Despite a slight contribution from the recently permitted Mid Big Canyon Diversion,the flow
for the City of Newport Beach diversions decreased 0.38 MG,primarily due to the Big Canyon Diversion being
off-line as a malfunctioning effluent meter was replaced. The Pelican Point Diversion flows again remained
constant from the previous report period.
Only three of the twenty-one diversions,the Santa Ana River,the Peters Canyon Pipeline,and a portion of the
Scenario Diversion flow to Plant 1. Due to the multiple paths that the Scenario flows can take to reach OCSD
Plant 1 or Plant 2 simultaneously,it is not possible to accurately determine how much water from this diversion
is available for the GW RS. The remaining 18 diversions are located closer to the coast flow to Plant 2,and
are not currently available for reclamation. The Santa Ana River and Peters Canyon Pipeline Diversions
discharged a total of 168 MG to Plant 1 in FY 2017/18. These two diversions account for 36.5%of the total
urban runoff diverted to the OCSD's collection system in FY 2017/18,and contributed an average of 14 MG to
GW RS per month.
OCSD expects to receive between 400 and 600 MG this coming year 9 current discharge trends continue.
During the past 19 years, OCSD treated 9.4 billion gallons of dry weather urban runoff that would have
otherwise gone into the ocean without treatment. Since OCSD's Urban Runoff Program began, total
treatment cost has reached approximately$10.3 million,based upon applicable industrial user fee rates over
this period. OCSD currently waives all fees and charges associated with authorized discharges of Dry
Weather Urban Runoff.
Table 10.10 details the current diversion locations,trunklineltribulary destinations,and the average discharge
volume of each individual location for this reporting period.
TABLE 10.10 Average Urban Runoff Discharge Volume by Diversion, FY 2017/18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Average
Urban Runoff Diversions Location Trunkline Tributary Discharge'
MGD
No. Description
Owned and Managed by City of Huntington Beach
Coast (via
1 Atlanta Diversion 8151 Atlanta Avenue Atlanta Plant 2 0.17
Interceptor)
2 Banning Diversion 2201 Malibu Lane Miller-Holder Plant 2 0.02 A
Coast (via
3 Newland Diversion 8612 Hamilton Street Atlanta Plant 0.135
Interceptor)
10.9
TABLE 10.10 Average Urban Runoff Discharge Volume by Diversion, FY 2017118
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Average
Urban Runoff Diversions Location Trunkline Tributary Discharge`
MGD '
4 Indianapolis Diversion 9221 Indianapolis Miller-Holder Plant 2 0.05
5 Hamilton Diversion 10101 Hamilton Avenue Miller-Holder Plant 0.10c
6 Meredith Diversion 20192 Mainland Lane Miller-Holder Plant 2 0.01
7 Flounder Diversion 9731 Flounder Drive Bushard Plant 0.01
8 Yorktown Diversion 9211 Yorktown Avenue Miller-Holder Plant 2 0.01
9 Adams Diversion 19661 Chesa ake Lane Miller-Holder Plant 2 0.05
10 Scenario Diversion 4742 Scenario Drive Knott Plant 1 &2- 0.03
11 1'Street CDS 1 103 Pacific Coast Hwy Coast I Plant 2 0.01
Owned and Managed by County of Orange
12 Greenville-Banning Channel 2501 Placentia Avenue Interplant Plant 2 0.26 °
13 Huntin ton Beach Channel 8092 Adams Avenue I Coast I Plant 2 1 0.15
14 Santa Ana River 10844 Ellis Avenue Sunflower Plant 1 0.03
Owned and Managed by Irvine Reach Wafer District
15 Los Trancos Diversion Pacific Coast Highway South Coast Plant 2 0.13
(Crystal Cove State Park
16 Muddy Canyon Diversion Pacific Coast Highway South Coast Plant 2 0.02
(El Moro State Park)
17 Peters Canyon Diversion 3001 Main Street Main Street Plant 1 0.43
Owned and Managed by City of Newport Beach
Newport Dunes Diversion 1131 Back Ba South Coast Plant 2 003
E
18 (Gravity Flow) y Drive (via Back Bay) 0.
19 Big Canyon 15 Rue Vane Lane South Coast Plant 2 0.05
20 Mid Big Canyon 1851 Jamboree Road South Coast Plant 2 0.0040
(via Back Bay)
Owned and Managed by PH Finance,LLC
21 Pelican Point Diversion 36 Pelican Point Drive South Coast Plant 2 0.01
Total of the Average Daily Discharges (IFY 2017/16 1.66 MGDt
Individual daily averages calculated using the formula-cumulative flow total for the year/number of discharge days
-Scenario flows to Plant t and Plant 2 simultaneously due to Bushard-Ellis junction box
Million Gallons per Day
A. Banning: System off-line Sep though Dec,Feb,Apr,and May(five-month average)
B. Newland: System off-line Nov though Jun(tour-month average)
C.Hamilton: System off-line Mar though Jun(eight-month average)
D.Greenville: System off-line Jul through May(one-month average)
E. Newport Dunes: System off-line in Nov through Mar(eight-month average)
F. Big Canyon: System off-line Aug though Mar(four-month average)
G.Mid Big Canyon: System flow reporting begins Apr(three-month average)
10.10
Table 10.11 summarizes several significant Urban Runoff Program statistics.
TABLE 10.11 Urban Runoff Program, FY 2017/18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protecilon Division
Item Count
Permits generated 2'
Permitted diversions 21
Total average daily discharge 1.66 MGD
Monthly average daily discharge range 0.29- 1.90 MGD
Additional proposed diversions 3-
Estimated combined discharge for proposed/pending diversions 2.4 MGD
Maximum combined urban runoff discharge allowance 10 MGD"'
' Reflects one new permit issued,Mid Big Canyon Diversion issued O8/08/2017-No. U600340,and one permit renewal
for Scenario Diversion issued on 10/012017-U-041115
Reduced from five on previous annual report as two diversions moved from proposed to pending
Resolution No. 13-09 accommodates 10 MGD of urban runoff without cost to permittees
10.5.2 Proposed Urban Runoff Diversion Systems
The City of Newport Beach's Arches Diversion project, varied with OC Watershed's Technical Advisory
Committee last year, is currently in the design stage. The project consists of two diversions near the
intersection of Newport Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway. OCSD Planning Division is currently working
with Newport Beach on the design specifications for the first diversion on Hoag Drive. The second Arches
Diversion located on Newport Boulevard is waiting for a Caltrans easement. Due to the need for an
easement, a completion timetable is not yet available. Construction on the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel
Diversion in the City of Santa Ana is nearing completion,and will likely go on-line within this upcoming fiscal
year. OCSD is currently working on the agreement for the Santa Ana-Delhi Channel dryweather urban runoff
discharge diversion to be executed between OCSD and OCPW. The Santa Ana-Delhi Channel Diversion is
projected to add an additional 1.4 MGD of flow to OCSD's Plant 1. There are two additional flood control
channel diversions in the City of Santa Ana in the proposal stage,the Santa Fe and the Lane which are both
proposed to be 0.5 MGD diversions. A recent inquiry about the Lane Channel Diversion suggests this maybe
the next diversion project OCPW pursues.
10.5.3 Dry Weather Urban Runoff Quality
OCSD requires self-monitoring of the urban runoff discharges to ensure discharge limit compliance for various
regulated constituents. OCSD also conducts quarterly sampling and analysis of the urban runoff discharges to
ensure discharge limit compliance with the various regulated constituents.Selenium and molybdenum were
added to the list of monitored constituents for all urban runoff permits as of the latest renewal cycle.
Overall,the monitoring of the urban runoff discharges shows very consistent compliance with OCSD's Local
Limits. The Urban Runoff Program,however,continues toexperience sporadic sulfide exceedances atthe fat
Street Continuous Deflective Separation (CDS) Diversion. Although monitoring resamples collected on
August 17, 2017, pending as of the previous report, showed the diversion back in compliance with a non-
detect value for Total Sulfide and a result of 0.215 mgfL for Dissolved Sullide,the diversion again reported
exosedances during monitoring conducted June 6,2018. That monitoring indicated a Total Sulfide analytical
result of 10.4 mg/L, which is 5.4 mg/L over the Local Discharge Limit of 5.0 mg/L,and a Dissolved Suit ide
10.11
result of 8.4 mg/L which is 7.9 mg/L over the Local Discharge Limit of 0.5 mg/L. These latest sulfide
exceedances triggered a Notice of Resample for the l st Street CDS Diversion. Results are pending asof the
reporting period's close. Due to the repeated sulfide exceedances at this location, the City of Huntington
Beach has initiated monthly cleaning of the CDS chamber to remove the captured debris.
There was one detectable value for the pesticide malathion of 21 ng/L submitted during this report period from
the OCPW-Huntington Beach Diversion. This one result is down from four detected the previous reporting
period. The detectable value was well within the Local Discharge Limit of 0.01 mg/L. Onlytwo United States
Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)Method 624 samples for total toxic organic(TTO)constituents out of
forty-six grab samples collected had a detectable constituent. Toluene was the detected TTO constituent in
both instances at the OCPW-Santa Ana River Diversion,which showed 0.012 mg/L,and the other at the City
of Newport Beach-Dunes Diversion reporting 0.016 mg/L. Although OCSD no longer has a local limit for
TTOs as of the adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD-48, the TTO monitoring provides a measure of safety by
screening for Pollutants of Concern(POC). Detectable methylene chloride values of 6 ug/L and 4 ug/L were
reported at two City of Huntington Beach diversion locations by the same environmental lab during the same
monitoring event were likely due to lab contamination during sample analysis and are not included in Table
10.13 below.
Detectable amounts of Oil and Grease of Mineral or Petroleum Origin were found in 42%of samples collected.
The reported high value of 17.0 mg/L was well within the Local Discharge Limit of 100.0 mg/L. Monitoring
results for the metal constituents were all well within the Local Discharge Limits.
Table 10.12 summarizes the minimum and maximum concentrations detected in the urban runoff during the
reporting period. OCSD's latest Instantaneous Discharge Limits are included for comparison.
TABLE 10.12 Urban Runoff Compliance, FY 2017/18
Orange County Sanitation District, Resource Protection Division
Minimum Maximum Instantaneous
Constituent Concentration Reported` Concentration Reported Discharge Limit
(mg/l) (mg/L) (mg/L)
Ammonia N NO <0.05 17.0 None
BOD ND <20 58 None
TSS ND <10 160 None
Cadmium ND <0.007 0.10 1.0
Chromium ND <0.01 024 20.0
Copper NO <0.01 0.91 3.0
Lead NO <0.02 0.11 2.0
Molybdenum ND <0.01 0.50 2.3
Nickel ND <0.01 0.25 10.0
Selenium NO <0.01 0.07 3.9
Zinc ND <0.02 2.17 10.0
Oil&Grease Min. ND <0.7 15.0 100
Sulfide(Dissolved) NO <0.1 8.4 0.5
Sulfide otal NO <O.1 10.6 5.0
Pesticides ND <0.00025 0.000021" 0.01
Total Toxic Organics NO (<0.01) 0.016" None
NO-Non-Detectable(below analytical detection limits)
` Detectable analytical value due entirely to Malathion
Detectable analytical value due entirely to Toluene
OCSD's Urban Runoff Program continues its success in helping to maintain the quality of the receiving waters
along the Orange County Coastline. For a second year, the Heal the Bays 2017/18 Beach Report Card
detailed very favorable results for Orange Countys beaches. Overall, Summer Dry and Winter Dry grades
10.12
were on par with the five-year average,with 98%A or B grades for the Dryperiods and 91%A or B grades for
the Wet Weather,down slightly from the 93%for 2016/17. Two beaches that directly benefit from the Urban
Runoff Program made this year's"Honor Roll',Corona Del Mar(A+,A+,A+)and Crystal Cove(A+,A+,A+).
Although Pelican Point Beach fell off the roll this year,this year's grades were still respectable(A+,A,A+).
Other locations that benefit due to their proximity of a diversion:Santa Ana River Mouth(A+,A,C)moved up
to A+for Summer Dry,Brookhurst Street(A,A.D)moved up to A for Winter Dry,Magnolia Street(A,A+,D)
moved up to A+for Winter Dry but down to D for Wet Weather,and Jack's Snack Bar at Huntington Street
(A+,A, C) repeated last year's results.
OCSD's Urban Runoff Program provides an important economic benefit to the Orange County economy by
maintaining the coastline's reputation as a desirable tourist destination. By helping to keep our beaches open,
the program continues to provide a significant benefit to the beach-going public.
The role of the Urban Runoff Program expanded with the addition of diversions issued to the Big Canyon
permit on February 1, 2015. Peters Canyon on July 1, 2016, and Mid Big Canyon on August 9, 2017.
Constructed to reduce selenium-laden waters reaching the Upper Newport Bay,these diversions enhance the
estuarine environment for the threatened and endangered species that inhabit the area. Based upon Orange
County Watersheds'estimate,diversion of the various Peters Canyon Wash and Big Canyon tributaries will
decrease the amount of selenium reaching the bay by 150 to 250 pounds annually. A mass loading
calculation for these three diversions,based upon the flow and monitoring data received to date,indicates 123
pounds of selenium have been diverted from the bay.
This rerouting of urban runoff from stonnwater pump stations, flood control channels, and natural
conveyances before it reaches receiving waters,allows OCSD to provide essential regional public health and
water quality protection. In this manner,the program is instrumental in providing vital protection to the Areas
of Special Biological Significance along Orange Counys coastline.
10.5.4 Urban Runoff Diversion Locations
The diversion systems are located in four different watersheds in Orange County: Anaheim Bay-Huntington
Harbor,Lower Santa Ana River,Newport Bay,and Newport Coastal. These watersheds encompass a vanety,
of designated land uses such as residential,commercial, industrial,and agriculture.
10.6 DENTAL AMALGAM
On June 14,2017,the EPA published technology-based Pretreatment Standards under the Clean Water Act
to reduce discharges of mercuryfrom dental offices into municipal sewage treatment plants known as Publicly
Owned Treatment Works(POTWs). The new Dental Office Point Source Category requires dental offices to
utilize amalgam separators and implement two BMPs. The Dental Office Point Source Category became
effective on July 14,2017.
New dental facilities opened on or after June 14, 2017, designated Pretreatment Standards New Sources
(PSNS), must immediately comply with pretreatment standards, including the installation of amalgam
separators. A One-Time Compliance Report must be submitted to OCSD no later than 90 days following the
introduction of wastewater to OCSD. Although PSNS does not include the purchase of an existing dental
facility, those facilities changing ownership must also submit their report no later than 90 days following the
transfer. Existing facilities without amalgam separators on June 14,2017,designated Pretreatment Standards
Existing Sources (PSES), must install amalgam separators by July 14, 2020 and submit their One-Time
Compliance Reports by October 12,2020. Dental facilities with amalgam separators on June 14,2017 must
replace those separators by June 14,2027. PSNS dentists must comply immediately and must submit reports
within 90 days of commencing discharge.
To conform to this federal Pretreatment Program requirement,OCSD implemented a Dental Amalgam Source
Control Program to enable the dental offices to comply with this new regulation. OCSD developed and posted
Dental Office Point Source Category information on the OCSD website(www.ocsd.com)complete with links to
10.13
the EPA's development Document, effluent guidelines, fact sheet, and the applicable Dental Category
regulation. This information was present on the website as of August 2017. Two compliance reports forms
were developed in Portable Document Format(PDF),a comprehensive form for facilities that place or remove
amalgam, and a second exemptilimited forth for facilities that only remove amalgam on a limited or
emergency basis. The PDF form allows a dental facility to save and store a copy of the report in an electronic
form. The forms were first made available in September 2017.
As required by the regulation,OCSD implemented procedures for receiving, reviewing,and retaining
dental office Compliance Reports. OCSD conducted its first mass mailing to 922 dental offices in OCSD's
service area in January 2018,and as of the end of this reporting period, has received and processed
approximately 60 reports. OCSD is currently assisting the dental offices with their report submittals, and
expects this activity to continue until the required amalgam separator installation and report submittal
deadlines are reached,July 14, 2020 and October 12,2020 respectively. OCSD plans to continue
reaching out to the dental community and assisting the dental offices with the new regulation during this
critical compliance period.
10.7 PUBLIC EDUCATION
Resource Protection Division staff routinely attend outside agency/association meetings,conferences,
and workshops; serve on committees; and give presentations. Working with other agencies and
associations benefits OCSD by keeping abreast of potential future regulation and trends which may
be beneficial or have impacts that OCSD must prepare for, as well as providing information to the
public about OCSD's programs. Listed below are public outreach activities for FY 2017/18.
10.7.1 California Water Environment Association
A Pretreatment Program staff member was invited to speak at a joint Water Environment Federation
(W EF)and California Water Environment Association(CWEA)webcast,"Unking Member Associations
with Important Federal Policies and Local Trends". The webcast was held on June 6,2018 and
presented, "California EPA Region 9 Regulatory Issues", based on experiences working with the Federal
EPA and following transference of policy to the EPA Regions across two Presidential administrations in
the WEF Government Affairs Committee leadership.
10.7.2 Industrial Environmental Coalition Of Orange County
On January 25,2018,a Pretreatment Program staff member presented an OCSD Regulatory Update
at the Industrial Environmental Coalition of Orange County(IEC/OC) annual regulatory update
meeting. The IEC/OC provides a forum for communication between industry and government on
environmental health and safety issues. The Pretreatment Program staff member informed 60
attendees about OCSD's Local Limits, NPDES Permit Renewal, Dental Amalgam Program,State
Water Board update on Fire Retardants(Per-and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances), Nutrient Regulation,
Constituents of Emerging Concern,a federal update on Tax Cut Jobs Act, Infrastructure Financing,
and EPNs Strategic Plan.
10.14
appendices
Monitoring and Compliance Status Report
Summary of Priority Pollutants and Trace Constituents Analyses
Priority Pollutants
Fees/Penalties for Non-Compliances
Public Notice of Significantly Non-Compliant Industries
Acknowledgements
IRWD Sampling
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) Reports, Data, SNC Notice
CA/QC Analysis Results
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
appendix a
MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE
STATUS REPORT
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division Mks
Wall
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status qW
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
192W Holly Sq class 1 Permit
19200 Holly Street,LLC 1-581176 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 2 6 3 Deactivated
CA 92648
Published as
Significantly
1575 N.Case St, Non New Class 1
9W Halo Western opCo,L.P. 1-600378 Orange CA 92867 812332 403.5(d) 3 15 - compliant New lass 1
SNQ for
Reporting
Violation s
18330 Ward St,
A&G Electropolish 1-531422 Fountain Valley,CA 332813 433.17(.) 4 17 11
927M
A&K Deburring and 2008 S.yale St,H
1-511362 Unit,Santa Ana,CA 332812 403.5(d) 4 29 5
Tumbling,Inc. 927M
1198 N.Grove St,B
A&R Powder Coating,Inc. 1-021088 Unit,Anaheim,CA 332812 433.17(a) 5 19 11 Molybdenum
928M
560G Beach Blvd,
Access Business Group,LLC 1-531435 Buena Park,CA 325412 439.47 4 10 15
90621
Accurate Circuit Engineering 1-011138 3019 Kitson or,Santa
g g Ana,CA 92707 334412 433.17(a) 3 9 11
Active Plating,Inc. 1-011115 1411 E.Pomona St 05 332813 433.17(a) 5 32 26 zinc
Santa Ana,CA 927
Advance Tech Plating,Inc. 1-021399 1061 N"Grove St, 332813 433.17(a) 4 26 11
Anaheim,CA 92806
Air Industries Company,A 7100 Chapman Ave,
PCC Company(Chapman) 1-031013 Garden Grove,CA 332722 403.5(d) 4 13 5
92841
Air Industries Company,A 12570 Knott St, 433.15(a),471.64(a),
PCC Company(Knott) 1-531404 Garden Grove,CA 332722 471.65(a) 4 37 63
92841
Alex C.Fergusson 1-031186 8371 Monroe Ave, 325611 417,166,417.176, 4 6
Stanton,CA 90680 417.36
19065 Stewart St,
Alexander Oil Company 1-581185 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 4 17 5
CA 92648
All Metals Processing of O.C., 1-031110 SOOT Standus[rial S[, 332813 433.17(a) 4 16 30
Inc. S[an[on,G4 90fi80
Page 1 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
Alliance Medical Products, 1-541182 9342 Jeronimo Rd, 325412 439.47 4 15 10
Inc. Irvine,CA 92618
Allied Electronics Services, 1-011m3 1342 E.Borchard Unk, 334412 a33.v(al 4 29 11
Inc. Santa Ana,CA 92705
464.15(a),464.15(b),
6uena550 Park,aballero
464.15(c),464.15(h),
Alloy Die Casting Co. 1-53143] Buena Park,CA 331523 464.45(a),464.45(b), 3 18 27
90620
464.45 d
Alloy Tech Electropolishing, 1-011036 2220 S.Humn or, 332812 433.1](a) 5 21 16 Nickel
Inc. Santa Ana,CA 92704
Alsco,Inc. 1-021656 1755 S.Anaheim Blvd,Anaheim,CA 92802 812331 403sla) 4 20 32 0&G min.
Aluminum Forge-Div.of 1-ori035 502 E.AIton Ave, 332112 46]A6 5 16 30
Alum.Precision Santa Ana,CA 9270]
Aluminum Precision Products, 1-51138] 3323 W.Warner Ave, 332112 46].46 4 14 12
Inc.k3 Santa Ana,C4 9Z]04
Aluminum Precision Products, 1-011100 2621 S.Susan St, 332112 467.45,467.46 4 16 21
Inc.-Susan Santa An a,CA 92704
Aluminum Precision Products, 1-011038 3132 W.Central Unk, 332112 467.45 3 16 13
Inc.Central ismita Ana,CA 91704
American Circuit Technology, 1-021249 5330 E.Hunter Ave, 334412 433.17(a) 3 11 11
Inc. Anaheim,CA 92807
Amerimax Building Products, 1-021102 1411 N"Daly St, 332812 465.35 3 12 8
Inc Anaheim,CA 92806
6965 Aragon Cir,
Arr ipeo,Inc. 1-031057 Buena Park,CA 312111 4035(d) 4 16 -
90620
1330&1340
Anaheim EArusion Co.,Inc. 1-021168 N.Knemer Blvd, NULL 46).35(c) 4 19 8
Anaheim,CA 92806
Anchen Pharmaceuticals,Inc. 1-541180 Rra'rbanks Unk' 325412 439.4] 4 11 31 acetone
Fairbanks Irvine,CA92618
Anchen Pharmaceuticals,Inc. 1-600359 SGootlyear Unk, 325412 439.4] New Class
(Goodyear) Irvine,G492618 Permit Issued
Anchen Pharmaceuticals,Inc. 15411]9 9601 Jeronimo Rd, 325412 439.47 4 11 15
(Jeronimo) Irvine,CA 92618
1055 Ortega Way,C
Andres Technical Plating 1-szv9e unit,Placentia,u 332813 433.17(a) 5 19 26 Nickel
928]0
Page 2 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
WIN
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
1102 East
AnoChem Coatings 1-61(1 washington Ave, 332813 433.17(a) 4 26 13
Santa Ana CA 92701
Anodyne,Inc. 1-511389 223G s.suaern St, 332813 433.17(a) 4 26 90
Santa Ana,CA 92704
Anomil Ent.Dba Danco Metal 1-011155 401 Rowland Unk, 332813 433.17(a) 4 16 26
Surfacing Santa Ana,CA 92707
APR Orange County 1-600503 1900 Petra tn,C untt, 334412 433.17(a) 2 9 27 Copper New Class
Placentia,CA 92870 Permit Issued
Aqua-Con Company 1-011066 1306 E.Pomona St, NULL 403.5(tl) 3 14 16 Class 1 Permit
Santa Ana,C492705 Deactivated
433.15(a),433.17(a),
467.46,471.65(i),
Arconic Global Fasteners& 800 S.State College 471.650),471.65(m),
1-021091 Blvd,Fullerton,CA 332722 471.65(n),471.65(0), 5 37 44 CN amen.
Rings,Inc. 92831 471.65(p),471.65(q),
471.65(r),471.65(s),
471.65 w 471.65(x
ARO Service 1-021192 1186 N.Grove St, 336411 433.17(a) 4 15 10
Anaheim,CA 92806
Arrowhead Products 1-031137 4411 Katella Ave,Los 336413 433.17p) 4 19 18
Corporation Alamitos,CA 90720
24855 Cc rbit PI,
Aseptic Technology,LLC 1-501002 yonder Linda,CA 31193 403.5(d) 3 15 16
92887
Published as
Significantly
Astech Engineered Products, 3030 Red Hill Ave, Non-
Inc. 1-571295 Santa Ana,CA 93705 336412 433.11Ia1 4 22 24 Compliant
(SNC)for
Reporting
Violation s
Auto-Chlor System of 1-511384 530 Goetz Ave,Santa 325611 417.166 3 4 1
Washington,Inc. Ana,CA 92707
Aviation Equipment 1571 MacArthur Blvd,
1-071037 Costa Mesa,CA 336413 433.17(a) 4 15 10
Processing 92626
Avid Bioservices,Inc. 1-571332 14191 Myford Rd,Tustin,CA 92780 325414 439.27 4 15 6
B.Braun Medical,Inc. 1-071054 2525 Ml Ave, 325412 439.47,463.26, 4 29 3
(East/Main) Irvine,CA 92614 463.36
Page 3 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status qW
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
B.Braun Medical,Inc. 1-600382 2206 Alton Pk", 325412 439.4] 3 13 2 New Class1
(North/Alton) Irvine,CA 92614 Permit Issued
B.Braun Medical,Inc. 2525 Mcgaw Ave, 439A7,463.16,
West/Lake 1-541183 Irvine,CA 92614 325412 463.26,463.36 4 25 3
11371 Monarch St,
Basic Electronics,Inc. 1-033094 Garden Grove,CA 334412 433.17(a) 4 14 11
92841
127W Western Ave,
Bali Houston Co. 1-031010 Garden Grove,CA 33211 403.5(d) 4 22 12
92841
Beckman Coulter,Inc. 1-521824 2W S.Kraemer Blvd,Brea,CA 92823 334516 433.1](a) 4 17 13
Beo-Mag Plating 1-51137G 3313 W.Harvard Sr, 332$13 633.11(al 4 1$ 37
Santa Ana,CA 92704
Bimbo Bakeries llsa,Inc. 1-521838 5W S.Placentia Ave,Placentia,CA 92870 311$12 403.5(tl) 4 14 -
1735 Norangethorp
Black Oxide Industries,Inc. 1-021213 Park,Anaheim,CA 332812 433.17(a) 4 14 18
92801
5837 Casson or,
Blue Lake Energy 1-521795 yorba Linda,CA 211111 403.5(d) 4 9 4
92886
7474 Garden Grove
Bodycote Thermal Processing 1-031120 Blvd,Westminster, 332811 4035(d) 4 20 5
CA 92683
154M Graham St, Chromium,
Boeing Company(Graham) 1-111018 Huntington Beach, 33641 433.17(a) 5 29 11 Copper,Zinc
CA 92649
Brasstech,Inc. 1-511368 3230 S.standard Ave, 332813 433.17(a) 4 31 15
Santa Ana,CA 92705
Brea Power II,LLC 1-521837 1935 Valencia Ave, 221112 403.5(d) 2 10 16
Brea,CA 92823
Bridge Energy,LLC 1-600398 27"Valencia Ave, 211111 403.5(d) 4 11 3 New Class
Brea,CA 92823 Permit Issued
2930 E.Frontea St,A
Bridgemark Corporation 1-5218" unit,Anaheim,CA 211111 403.5(d) 4 9 5
928M
2211st St,
Brindle/Thomas-Bradley 1-531428 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 4 18 5
A 92648
Page 4 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
Brindle/Thomas-Brooks& 18462 Edwards St,
Kohlbush 1-531429 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.51d) 4 18 5
CA 92648
Brindle/Thomas-Catalina& 18851 Stewart St,
Copeland 1-531430 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.51d) 4 18 5
GA 92648
Brindle/Thomas-Dabney& 19192stewanst,
1-531427 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.51d) 4 18 5
Patton CA 92648
433.15(a),433.17(a),
467.36(c),
471.34(dd),
Bristol Industries 1-021226 630 E.Worbert Rd, 332722 471.34(ee), 5 33 41 Cadmium,CN
Brea,CA 92821 471.34(ff),471.34(i), ..on.,Nickel
471.34(r),471.34(5),
471.341t),471.34(u),
471.34 v
BroncS,Inc.,dba WesCoast 12641 Indust,5t, New Class 1
1-600519 Garden Grove,CA 313310 403.51d) 2
Textiles,Inc. Permit Issued
92841
Burlington Engineering,Inc. 1-521770 220 W.Grove Ave, 332811 433.171a1 6 16 9
orange,CA 92865
Cadillac Plating,Inc. 1-021062 1147 W.Struck Ave, 332813 433.17(a) 18 78 48 Copper
Oran e,CA 928W
413.14(c),413.14(g),
413.24(c),413.24(g),
15632 Container Ln, 413.541b1,413.54r)
Cal-Aurum Industries,Inc. 1-111089 Huntington Beach, 332813 413.641b1,613.64(f), 6 30 30
CA 92649 413.74(c),413.74(g),
433.17 i
California Gasket and Rubber 1-521832 533 W.Colllns Ave, 339991 428.661a1 3 15 5
Corporation orange,CA 92867
Cargill,Inc. 1-031060 600 N.Gllbert St, 311225 403.51d) 4 13 19
Fullerton,CA 92833
Cartel Electronics 1-521814
1900 Petra Ln,C Unit, Class 1 Permit
Placentia,CA 92870 NULL 433.17(a) 5 51 59 Copper Deactivated
Catalina Cylinders,A Div.of 7300 Anaconda Ave,
APP 1-031021 Garden Grove,CA 331318 467.46 4 17 13
92841
12650 Westminster
Cd Video,Inc. 1-511076 Ave,Garden Grove, 334613 433.17(a) 4 18 11
CA 92706
Page 5 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
Central Powder Coating 1-021189 593 Explorer St,Brea,CA 92821 332812 433.17(a) 4 29 11 Molybdenum
Cherry Aerospace 1-511381 1224 E.Warnerave, 332722 433.17(a),467.46, 4 2$ 46 ON
Santa Ana,CA 927O5 471.34(a),471.65(a)
Chromadora,Inc. 1-511414 25155.Birch St,Santa 332813 433.17(a) 4 19 26
Ana,CA 927D7
Circuit Technology,Inc. 1-521821 1911 N.Main sp 334112 433.17(al 5 29 11 copper
Orange,CA 92865
Cirtech,Inc. 1-021133 25O E.Emerson Ave, 334112 433.17(a) 4 27 25
Orange,CA 92865
City of Anaheim-Public 6751 E.Walnut
1-021073 Canyon Rd,Anaheim, 221310 4O3.5(d) 5 4 11
Utilities Dept CA 928O7
City Of Anaheim-Public 1-521862 11"N.Kraemer Blvd, 221112 4O3.5(d) 2 5 2
Utilities Dept. Anaheim,CA 928O6
City of Anaheim Public
Utilities(Water services 1-521843 21O 5.Anahelm Blvd, 22132O 4O3.5(d) Q 4 -
W RDF Anaheim,CA 92805
City of Anaheim,Ca nyon 3O71 E.Miraloma
1-600296 Ave,Anaheim,CA 221112 4O3.5(d) 4 5 -
Power Plant 929M
City of Huntington Beach Fire 19O81 Huntington St,
1-111015 Huntington Beach, 211111 4O3.5(d) 4 11 4
Department CA 92648
City of Tustin-Maintenance 1-071058 1472 service Rd, 921190 4O3.5(d) 4 20 6
Yard Tustin,CA 92780
City of Tustin Water Service 18602 E.17th 5t, 221310 4O3.5(d) 2 $ 3
17Th St. 1-071013 Tustin,CA 92705
City of Tustin,Water Service 1-071268 235 E.Main St,Tustin, 221310 4O3.5(tl) 1 1 2
(Main St) CA 92780
5005tate College
U Foods Manufacturing Corp. 1-521849 Blvd,Fullerton,CA 311824 4O3.5(d) 3 8 10
92831
5332 Commercial 5t,
Coast to Coast Circuits,Inc. 1-111129 Huntington Beach, 334412 433.17(al 5 26 26
CA 92649
7061 Patterson or,
Coastline Metal Finishing 1-531436 Garden Grove,CA 332813 433.17(al 4 27 28
92841
COCACala an ny-Anaheim l-031393 2121 E.Winston Rd, 312112 4O3.5(d) 2 6 3
Water Plant Anaheim,CA 928O6
Page 6 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
46605an Antonio Rd,
Columbine Associates 1-5217M E.on B St Dir,yorba 211111 403.5(d) 3 8 4
Linda,CA 92886
Continuous Coating 1-021290 520 wGrove Ave, 332812 433.171a1,465.15 4 23 27
Corporation Orange,CA 92865
Cooper and Brain,Inc. 1-031070 1390 Site or,
Brea, 211111 403.51d) 4 10 5
GA 92821
County Of Orange OC Waste 20662 Newport Coast Class 1 Permit
1-141003 Dr,Newport Coast, 221117 403.51d) 2 6 3
&R¢ryding Deactivated
CA 92657
CP-Carrillo,Inc. 1-571316 1902 MCGaw Ave, 336310 403.51d) 4 18 5
Irvine,CA 92614
Crest Coating,Inc. 1-021289 Anaheim,
9 332812 433.17(a) 4 16 11
Anaheim,CA 92805
CRH California Water,Inc. 1-011051 5025.Lyon St,Santa Ana,CA 927131 561990 403.51d) 2 10 5
18340 Mount Baldly
Custom Enamelers,Inc. 1-021297 Or,Fountain Valley, 332812 433.17(a) 3 17 12
6G492708
D.F.Stauffer Biscuit Co.,Inc. 1-600414 4041 W.Gary Ave, 311$21 403.51d) 2 $ _ PH New Class 1
Santa Ana,CA 92704 Permit Issued
Dare Shin USA,Inc. 1-031102 610 N.Gilbert"' 313310 4033(d) 4 25 15
Fullerton G491833
18962 Stewart Ln,
DAH Oil,LLC 1-581173 Huntington Beach, 211111 401 3 14 5
CA 92648
Darling International,Inc. 1-511378 2624 Hickory St, 562219 403.51d) 4 29 15
Santa Ana,CA 92707
Data Aire,Inc.#2 1-021379 230 W.Blueridge Ave, 332322 433.17(a) 4 16 11
Orange,CA 92865
Data Electronic Services,Inc. 1-011142 410 Nantucket Pl,Santa Ana,CA 92703 334412 433.17lal 4 26 11
Data Solder,Inc. 1-521761 2915 Kilson or,Santa 334412 433.I7(a) 3 11 11
Ana,CA 92707
Dayton Fldy06,LLC 1-600038 5805.Moll Unk,Placentia,CA 92870 311930 403.51d) Q 12 6
4541 Heil Ave,
DCOR,LLC 1-111013 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 4 10 5
CA 92649
6370 Alt ura Blvd, Class 1 Permit
Derm Cosmetic Labs,Inc. 1-031062 Buena Park,CA 325611 417.166 1 3 2 Deactivated
90620
Page 7 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
Diamond Environmental 1801 Via Burton
1-6002a4 None,B Unit, 532490 403.51d) 4 16 5
Services,LP Fullerton CA 92832
Dr.Smoothie Enterprises- 1-600131 1730 Raymer Ave, 311930 403.SId) 4 13 -
DBABevolutionGroup Fullerton,CA 92833
DRS Sensors&Targeting 30600Valley View
1-531405 Unk,cypress,CA 334413 469.18(a) 4 14 4
Systems,Inc. 90630
DS Services of America 1-021393 1522 N.Newhope Sp 312112 403.S(tl) 4 21 $
Santa Ana,CA 92J03
Ducommun Aerostructufes, 1-021105 1885 N.Batavia 5t, 336413 433.171a1 4 14 43
Inc. Orange,CA 92865
Dunham Metal Processing 1-021325 936 N.Parker 5p 332813 433.17(.) 4 24 27
Orange,CA 92867
E&B Natural Resources- 1901 California St
Angus Petroleum Corporation 1-600254 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 4 20 5
GA 92648
EFT Fast Quality Service,Inc. 1-011064 23285.Susan Sp Santa Ana,CA 92704 334112 433.171a1 4 18 11
Electra Metal Finishing 1-021158 1194 N.Gmve St, 332812 433.1]lal 4 11 11
Corporation Anaheim,CA 92806
Electrolurgy,Inc. 1-071162 1121 Duryea Ave, 332813 433.1](a) 5 12 91
Irvine,CA 92614
13932 Enterprise Dr, Cadmium,
Electron Plating ill,Inc. 1-021336 Garden Grove,CA 332813 433.1](z) 6 36 26 Copper,pH
92843
Electronic Precision 1-021337 537 Mercury Ln, 332813 433.17lal 5 35 27 Nickel
Specialties,Inc. Brea,CA 92821
Embee Processing tADOdlie) 1-600456 21485.Hathaway 5t, 332813 413.14(c),413.54(c), 1 4 6 New Class
Santa Ana,CA 92705 413.64(c),433.17(a) Permit Issued
2144 SHathaway St, 413.141c),413.54(c), New Classl
Embee Processing(Plate) 1-60045J Santa Ana,G492J05 332813 413.641c),413J4(c), 1 4 7 Permit Issued
033.1]a
Excello Circuits 1-521855 1924 Nancita Cir, 334412 433.1](a) 6 31 28 Copper
Manufacturing Corp. Placentia,CA 92870
Expo Dyeing and Finishing, 1-031322 1365 Knollwood Cir, 313310 403.5(d) 4 25 15
Inc. Anaheim,CA 92801
Fabrica International,Inc. 1-011278 32015.5usan Sp 314110 a28A6 4 13 -
Santa Ana,CA 92]04
Page 8 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
Fabrication Concepts 1800 E.Saint Andrew
1-011068 PI,Santa Ana,CA 332114 433.I1(a) 4 25 24
Corporation 92705
Fineline Circuits& 1-021121 594 Apollo St,Brea, 334412 433.17(a) 3 22 11
Technology,Inc. CA 92821
Chromium,
FMH Aerospace Corp IDEA 1-571331 17072 Daimler St. 332912 433.171a1 6 24 88 Copper,Lead,
FMH Corporation Irvine,CA 92614 Nickel,Silver,
Zinc
Gaffoglio Family 11161 Slater Ave, New Class
Metalcrafters 1-600443 Fountain Valley,CA 336111 426.66 2 6 - Permit Issued
92708
1230 E.saint
Gallade Chemical,Inc. 1-011257 Gertrude PI,Santa 422690 403.5(d) 4 17 -
Ana,CA 92707
Gemini Industries,Inc. 1-071172 2311 Pullman St, 331492 415.24,az1.2651a1 4 21 25
Santa Ana,CA 92705
Gemtech Coatings 1-600149 2737 S.Garnsey St, 332812 433.11Ial Q 2 1 Class 1 Permit
Santa Ana,CA 92707 Deactivated
General Container 5450 Dodds Ave,
Corporation 1-03I042 Buena Park,CA 322211 403.51d) 3 12 $
90621
GKN Aerospace Transparency 12122 western Ave,
1-531401 Garden Grove,CA 336413 403.5(d) 4 12 3
Systems 92MI
990 N.Enterprise St,
Gomtech Electronics,Inc. 1-021352 M unit,orange,CA 334412 433.17(a) 4 14 11
92867
12361 Monarch St,
Goodwin Company 1-031043 Garden Grove,CA 325611 403.5(d) 4 24 7
92841
19105Z.777St, Class 1 Permit
Gothard Street,LLC 1-581177 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.51d) 2 6 3 Deactivated
CA 92fi48
Graphic Packaging 1-571314 1600 Barranca Pk", 322212 403.5(d) 4 10 1 5
Inter I Irvine,C492606
Page 9 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
Published as
Significantly
Green Clean Water&Waste 1227 S.Claudina st, Non-
Services 1-52185] Anaheim,CA 92805 562219 43747(bl 2 13 15 Compliant
SNC)for
Reporting
Violation s
6700 Caballero Blvd,
Hanson-Loran Co.,Inc. 1-031107 Buena Park,CA 325612 417.166,417176 5 21 5
90620
Harbor Truck Bodies,Inc. 1-021286 255 voyager Ave, 336370 433.17(a) 5 31 31
Brea,CA 92821
1015 E.Orangethoipe
Harry's Dye&Wash,Inc. 1-521746 Ave.Anaheim,CA 313310 403.5(d) 4 26 15
92801
Hartwell Corporation 1-021381 900 Richfield Rd, 332999 403.5(d) 4 14 6
Placentia,CA 92870
Hi Tech Solder 1-52179G 700 Monroe way' 334412 433.17(a) 4 29 12
Placentia,CA 92870
Hightower Plating& 1-021185 2090 N.Glassell Onk, 332813 433.17(a) 4 26 26
Manufactunn Co. Orange,CA 92865
413.14(c),413.14(g),
829 ProduRion PI, 413.24(c),413.24(g),
Hil Metal Finishing 1-061115 Newport Beach,CA 332813 413.44(c,413.44(gl, 5 26 37 Cadmium,Nickel
413.54(c)),413.64(g,413.64(g),
92663
413.64(c ,
433.17(.)
House Foods America 7351 Orangewood
1-031072 Ave,Garden Grove, 311224 403.5(d) 3 6 - pH
Corporation CA 92841
1250&1270 N.Blue
Ideal Anodizing,Inc. 1-021041 Gum St,Anaheim,CA 332813 433.17(a) 4 26 11
928M
Ikon Powder Coating,Inc. 1-521756 1375 N.Miller Sp Anaheim,CA 92806 332$12 433.1](a) 4 16 11
1380 N.Knollwood
Image Technology,Inc. 1-521755 Cir,Anaheim,C4 325611 417.86 4 12 5
92801
2007 Raymer Ave,N
Imperial Plating 1-031106 Ste,Fullerton,CA 332813 433.17(a) 4 31 73
92833
Page 10 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
Imuraya USA,Inc. 1-541178 2502 Barran Pkwy, 311520 403.5Idl 4 8 -
Irvine,CA 92606
Independent Forge Company 1-021401 692 N.Batavia st, 332112 467.45 5 22 8
Orange,CA 92868
Industrial Metal Finishing,Inc. 1-521828 1941 Petra Ln, 332813 403.51d) 4 15 5
Placentia,CA 93870
InteC Products,Inc. 1-021399 1145 N.Grove St, 314999 403.51d) 4 24 -
Anaheim CA 92606
Integral Aerospace,LLC 1-600243 2036 cover Rd, 336413 a3s.vlal 4 18 25
Santa Ana,GA 9D05
6485 Descanw Ave,
International Paper 1-531419 Buena Park,CA 322224 403.51d) 4 13 5
90620
6211 Descanso Ave,
International Paper N3 1-031171 Buena Park,CA 322211 403.51d) 3 8 6
90620
International Paper Company 1-521820 601 E.Ball Rd, 322211 403.51d) 4 19 5
An aheim,CA 92805
Irvine Ranch Water District 1-SJ13D 1221 Edinger Ave, 221310 403.51d) 2 6 3
Wells 21/22 Desalter) Tustin,CA 92780
Irvine Ranch Water District- 1704 W.Segerul
onr5 1-011075 Ave,Santa Ana,CA 221310 403.51d) 3 13 9
927M
3001 Red Hill Ave,
Irvine Sensors Corporation 1-571328 3108 Unit,Costa 541712 469.18(a) 2 5 3
Mesa,CA 92626
307 N.Euclid Way,Hl
1&R Metal Finishing Co. 1-521823 Bldg,Anaheim,CA 332812 403.5(d) 4 22 4
92801
1&1 MARINE AQUISITIONS, 151 Shipyard Way,7
LLC 1-551152 Unit,Newport Beach, 336611 403.51d) 4 16 8
CA 92663
4311 Jamboree Rd,
Jazz Semiconductor 1-571292 Newport Beach,CA 334413 469.18Ia1 4 23 3
92660
1D Processing,Inc. 1-511407 2220 Cape Cod Way, 332813 433.17(a) 4 24 26
Santa Ana,CA 92703
Jellto Container,Inc. 1-021402 1151 IN Tustin Ave
Anaheim,CA 9280J, 322212 003.5(d) 4 22 9 Copper
18701 Edward,SE
John A.Thomas-Boise 0il 1-031065 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 4 20 5
CA 92648
Page 11 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division 412,
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIr 1,
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
Joint Forces Training Base,Los
1-031270 NULL 928110 4033(d) 4 15 -
Alami[as
11691 Coley River Cir,
Kenlen Specialities,Inc. 1-021171 Fountain valley,u 332812 433.17(a) q 17 11
927M
Kimberly Clark Worldwide 2001 E.Orangethome
Inc.,Fullerton Mill 1-021425 Unk,Fullerton,CA 322121 430,127 4 17 -
92831
Kinsbursky Brothers Supply, 1314 N.Anaheim
1-021424 Blvd,Anaheim,CA 423930 403.5(d) 5 25 5 Cadmium
Inc. 92801
Kirkhill TA Company(Noah) 1-021426 300 E'cypress St,Brea,CA 92821 339991 028J61a1 Q 9 $
Kirkhill TA Com Perry(South) 1-021052 300 E.Cypress St,Brea,CA 92821 339991 428J61a1 q 9 $
Formerly listed
Kraft Heinz Company 1-071056 2450 white Rd, 311941 403.5(d) q 8 - as Todds,A
Irvine,CA 92614 Division of H)
Heinz LLC
Kryler Corporation 1-021428 1217 E.Ash Ave' 332$13 413.14(b),413.14(l), 4 27 12
Fullerton,CA 92831 433.17(a)
3565 Cadillac Ave,
Kyocera Precision Tools,Inc. 1-511385 Costa Mesa,CA 333515 403.5(d) 4 11 5
92626
La Habra Bakery 1-031029 8505.Cypress Unk,La Habra,CA 90631 311$12 403.5(tl) 4 17 1
Legendary Baking of 1600294 3102 W.Adams St, 311$12 003.5(d) Q 16 New Class
California,LLC Santa Ana,CA 92704 Permit Issued
Lightning Diversion Systems 16572 Burke Ln,
LLC 1-600338 Huntington Beach, 334412 433.17(.) 4 1 12 11
GA 92647
5285.Central Park
Linco Industries,Inc. 1-021253 Ave,West Dir, 332812 403.5(d) 5 32 13 O&G min.
Anaheim,CA 92802
Class 1 Permit
27"Valencia Ave, Deactivated
Linn Energy 1-531808 Brea,CA 92821 211111 403.5(d) 1 8 3 Formerlylisted
as Bridge
Energy,LLC
LM Chrome Corporation 1-511361 654 young St,Santa 332813 433.17(.) 6 32 34 CN
Ana,CA 92705
Page 12 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
17592 Metder Ln,
Logi Graphics,Inc. 1-031N9 Huntington Beach, 334412 433.17(a) 3 24 8
CA 92647
121SLSW Enterprises,LLC 1-521863 Anaheim,
im,CA
28 562219 403.51d) 10 6 10 pH
Anaheim,CA 92806
5322 Mcfadden Ave,
M.S.Bellows 1-111007 Huntington Beach, 332813 433.17(a) 4 16 11
CA 92649
2475 W.La Palma
Magnetic Meals Corporation 1-531391 Ave,Anaheim,CA 335311 433.17(a) 5 21 11
92801
Manufactured Packaging 1-521793 3200 Enterprise St, 322211 403.SId) 4 18 5 Copper,
Products Brea,CA 92821 Molybdenum
Published as
Significantly
Manufactured Packaging 1901 E.Rosslynn Ave, Non-
Products(MPP Fullerton) 1-021681 Fullerton,CA 92831 322211 403.5(d) 4 11 - Compliant
(SNQ for
Discharge
Violation i
1111 E.Mcfadden
Markland Manufacturing,Inc. 1-011046 Ave,Santa Ana,CA 332813 433.17(a) 4 28 30
92705
Maruchan,Inc.(Deere) 1-071024 1902 Deere Ave, 311824 403.5(d) 4 22 5
Irvine,C492W6
158M Laguna
Maruchan,Inc.(Laguna Cyn) 1-141015 Canyon Rd,Irvine,CA 311824 403.51d) 4 22 5
92618
Marukome USA,Inc. 1-141023 17132 Pullman St, 311991 403.5hn 4 12 5
Irvine,C492614
Master Wash,Inc. 1-511399 3120 Kilson 5t,Santa 811192 403.51d) 5 10 -
Ana,CA 92707
1601 E.Crangethome
Mckenna Labs,Inc. 1-021422 Ave,Fullerton,CA 325620 417.86 4 6 -
92831
MCP Foods,Inc. 1-021029 4245.Atchison St, 311942 403.5(d) 4 15 15
Anaheim,CA 92805
Medtronic Heart Valves,Inc. 1-071051 1851 E.Deere Ave, 334510 403.51d) 4 13 -
Santa Ana,CA 92705
Meggitt,Inc. 1-600006 146M Myfon9 Rd, 334519 433.17(a) 3 10 7 New Class 1
Irvine,C492606 Permit Issued
Page 13 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
Merical,Inc. 1-521840 233 E.Bristol Lo, 325412 439.47 4 15 15
Orange,CA 92865
1350Gincr Ave,
Mesa Water District 1-06101 Costa Mesa,CA 221310 403.5(d) 4 19 5
92626
Micrometals,Inc. 1-021153 5615 E.La Palma Ave, 334416 433.1](a) 4 18 11
Anaheim CA 92807
Murrietta Circuits 1-521811 50011 6.Landon sh 334412 433.1](a) 4 28 11
Anaheim,CA 92807
Nalco Cal Water,LLC 1-521748 1961 Petra Ln, 561990 403.51d) 4 23 6
Placentia CA 926]0
Neutronic Stamping and 10535 Lawson River
Plating 1-521772 Ave,Fountain Valley, 334417 433.17(a) 3 15 11
CA 92708
Newport Corporation 1-071038 1791 Deere Ave' 334516 403.51d) 4 17 3
Irvine,CA 92606
22725 Savi Ranch
Nobel Biocare USA,LLC 1-521801 Pkwy,yorba Linda, 339114 433.17(a) 4 16 12
CA 92887
Nor-Cal Beverage Co.,Inc 1-023284 1226 N.Olive St, 312111 403.SId) 4 16 -
(Main) Anaheim,CA 92801
Nor-Cal Beverage Co.,Inc. 1-021283 1226 N.011ve St, 312111 403.51d) 4 16 -
NCB Anaheim,CA 92801
780D Palin Clq
O'Donnell Oil Company,LLC 1-581191 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.51d) 4 12 6
CA 92648
20661 Newport Coast
O.C.Waste&Recycling 1-141018 Dn Newport Beach, 562910 403.5(d) 2 10 3
CA 92657
Oakley,Inc. 1-141012 1lcon Unk,Foothill 339115 463.16,a63.26, 4 16 4
Ranch,CA92610 463.36
11665 Coley River Cin
Omni Metal Finishing,Inc. 1-021520 Fountain Valley,CA 332813 433.171a) 4 25 32
92708
Orange County Plating Co., 956 IN Parker St, Class l Permit
Inc 1-021535 Orange,CA 92867 332813 a33.vp1 1 5 7 Deactivated
Pacific Image Technology,Inc. 1-021070 Anaheim,CA Cruz St, 334112 433.171a) 4 22 11
Anaheim,CA 92605
Pacific Western Container 1-511371 4044 W.Garry Ave,Santa Ana,CA 92704 322211 403.5(d) 4 15 10
Parker Hannifin Corporation 1-141002 14300 Alton Pkwy, 332912 433.170) Q 1 -
Irvine,CA 92618
Page 14 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
Patio and Door Outlet,Inc. 1-521783 410 W.Fletcher Ave, 332812 433.17(a) 4 24 11
Orange,CA 92865
Patriot Wastewater,LLC 314 W.Freedom Ave, 562219 437.471b) 4 31 56
Freedom CWT 1-521861 Orange,CA 92865
Patriot Wastewater,LLC 1-600147 314 W.Freedom Ave, 562219 403.5(tl) 4 21 5
(Freedom Non-CWT) Orange,CA 92865
Patriot Wastewater,LLC 2840 E.Miraloma Class 1 Permit
(Miraloma CWT) 1-600009 Ave,Anaheim,CA NULL 437,47(b) - 12 - Deactivated
92806
Patriot Wastewater,LLC 2840 E.Miraloma Class 1 Permit
(Miraloma Non-CWT) 1-600013 Ave,Anaheim,CA NULL 403.5(d) - 10 5 Deactivated
928M
6261 Caballero Blvd,
Pepsi-Cola Bottling Group 1-031295 Buena Park,CA 312111 403.5(d) 5 10 -
90620
Performance Powder,Inc. 1-521805 2B20 E.La Jolla sq 332812 633.17(a) 4 16 13
Anaheim CA 92606
31920th St,
Petroprize Corporation 1-581180 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 4 9 5
CA 92648
2012nd St,
Pier Oil Company,Inc. 1-581178 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.51d) 4 10 5
CA 92648
Pioneer Circuits,Inc. 1-011262 3010 S.Shannon St, 334412 433.17p) 4 30 26
Santa Ana,CA 92704
1173 N.Fountain
Platinum Surface Coating,Inc. 1-521852 Way,Anaheim,CA 332813 433.17(a) 5 18 13 CN
928M
16801 Rumson St,
Plegel Oil Company-(A.H.A.) 1-021176 Yorba Linda,CA 211111 403.51d) 4 11 5
92886
Plegel Oil Company,Inc. Sao Mammoth Way,
Blattner 1-521860 Placentia,CA 92870 211111 403.SId) j 1Q 5
POwderCoat Services,LLC- 307 N.Eudid Way
1-600167 Blvd,E Bldg, 332812 433.17(a) 4 15 11
Building E Anaheim CA 92801
POwderCoat Services,LLC- 237 N.Euelld Way,J
1-600168 Bldg,Anaheim,CA 332812 433.17(a) 4 14 11
Building 92801
Power Distribution,Inc. 1-511400 4011 W.Carriage or, 335311 003.5(d) 3 21 8
Santa Ana,CA 92704
Page 15 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
Powerdrive Oil&Gas 61316th St,
Company,LLC(16th) 1-6W246 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.51d) 4 6 4
CA 92648
Powerdrive Oil&Gas 21632 Surveyor Cir,
Company,LLC(Surveyor) 1-600245 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 4 - -
CA 92646
Precious Metals Plating Co., 1-011265 2635 orange Ave, 332813 433.17(a) 4 30 11
Inc. Santa Ana,CA 92707
Precision Anodizing&Plating, 1-521809 1601 N.Miller St, 332813 433.17(a) 5 33 29 Zinc
Inc. Anaheim,CA 92806
Precision Circuits West,I nc. 1-011008 3310 W.Harvard St 334412 433.17(a) 5 29 11 Copper
Santa Ana,CA 92704
Precision Resource,California 5803 Engineer St,
1-131002 Huntington Beach, 332710 403.5(d) 4 26 5
Division CA 92649
Precon,Inc. 1-021591 3131 E.L.Palma Ave, 332721 403.51d) 4 23 20
Anaheim CA 92806
6237 Desranso Cir,
Primal Industries,Inc. 1-031036 Buena Park,CA 313310 403.5(d) 4 13 5
90620
Prudential Overall Supply 1-071235 16901 Arton St, 812332 003S1d) 5 24 10
Irvine,CA 92606
Pulmuone Wildwood,Inc. 1-531397 2315 Moore Ave, 311991 403.5(d) 6 22 15 PH
Fullerton G492833
Q-FlexInc. 1-600337 1301 E.Hunter Ave, 334418 433.17(a) 5 14 8 Silver
Santa Ana,CA 92705
Quality Aluminum Forge,LLC 1-521833 814 N.Cypress St, 332112 467.45 5 32 13
(Cypress North Orange,CA 92867
Quality Aluminum Forge,LLC 794 N.Cyprers St,
(Cypress South 1-600272 Orange,CA 92867 332112 467.46 6 27 9
Quikturn Professional 1-521858 567 S.Melmse St, 333249 403.5(d) 4 15 3
Screenprinting Placentia,CA 92870
Railmakers,Inc 1-061138 864 W.18[h St,Costa 332323 433.17(a) 3 11 8
Mesa,CA 92fiD
Rayne Dealership Corporation l-571303 1J8355ky Park CigM 454390 403.5(d) 4 19 -
S[e,Irvine,CA 92614
RBCTransport Dynamics 3131 W.Segers[rom
1-011013 Ave,Santa Ana,CA 336413 433.17(a) 5 14 11
Corp 92704
Page 16 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
3110 W.Harvard St,
Reid Metal Finishing 1-511376 14 Unit,Santa Ana, 332813 433.17(a) 5 25 38
CA 92704
2191st St,
Remora Operating CA,LLC 1-581192 Huntington Beach, 211111 403.51d) 4 10 5
CA 92648
Republic Waste Services 1-521827 2727 Coronado St, 56211 403.51d) 4 12 3
Anaheim,CA 92806
Republic Waste services of 1-021169 1235 N.Blue Gum St, 562111 403.51d) 4 20 3
So.Cal.,LLC Anaheim,CA 92806
3401 W.Segerstrom
Rich Products Corp. 1-5114N Ave,Santa Ana,CA 311812 403.51d) 4 13 5
927M
Rigiflex Technology,Inc. 1-021187 1166 N.Grove St, 334412 433.17(a) 4 26 10
Anaheim,CA 92806
Robinson Pharma,Inc. 1-511413 2632 S.Croddy Way, 325412 439.47 5 16 23
Crodd Santa Ana,CA 92704
Robinson Pharma,Inc 1-600126 11115.1arbor Blvd, 325412 439.47 5 25 18
(Harbor North) Santa Ana,CA 92704
Robinson Pharma,Inc. 1-511412 33305.Harbor Blvd, 325412 439.47 5 25 19
Harbor5outh) 5anta Ana,CA 92704
Robinson Pharma,Inc. 2626 Shannon St Class 1 Permit
1-511416 325412 439.47 1 - 7
Shannon Santa Ana,CA 92704 Deactivated
Rolls-Royce HTC 1-600212 5730 Katella Ave, 541712 403.5(d) 5 9 8
Cypress,CA 90630
Rolls-Royce HTC(fume 1-600213 573D Katella Ave, 541712 403.5(d) 4 6 5
scrubber Cypress,CA M630
712 N.Valley St,B
Roto-Die Company,Inc. 1-021033 Ste,Anaheim,CA 332710 433.17p1 4 24 10
9280]
11414th5t,
Rountree/Wright 1-111028 12&14/113 LotBIk, 211111 403.51d) 4 13 5
Enterprises,LLC Huntington Beach,
A 92648
Royalty Carpet Mills,Inc. 1-071240 17352 Derian Ave, 314110 4033Id) - _ _ Class 1 Permit
Irvine,CA 92614 Deactivated
18742 Golden.,t
S&C Oil Co.,Inc. 1-581175 St,Huntington Beach, 211111 403.5(d) 5 18 5 C&G min.
CA 92649
Page 17 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
Safran Electronics&Defense, 3184 Pullman St,
1-5713N Costa Mesa,CA 335931 433.17(a) 3 14 10
Avionics USA,LLC. 92626
2955 Airway Ave,
Sanmina Corporation(Airway) 1-061W8 Costa Mesa,CA 334412 433.17(a) 4 27 26
92626
2950 Red Hill Ave,
Sanmina Corporation(Redhill) 1-063009 Costa Mesa,CA 334412 433.17(a) 4 27 26
92626
Santana Services 1-021016 1224 E.Ash Ave, 332813 433.17(a) 4 16 12
Fullerton,CA 92831
1901 Via Burton
Schreiber Foods,Inc. 1-021049 None,Fullerton,CA 311511 403.5(d) 4 5 -
92831
Scientific Spray Finishes,Inc. 1-031311 315 S.Richman Ave,Fullerton,CA 92832 332$12 033.17(a) 4 14 11
333 Mccormick Ave,
Semicoa 1-571313 Costa Mesa,CA 334413 469.18(a) 2 3 15
92626
Serrano Water District 1-021137 Stange,CAAve, 221310 403.5(d) 3 4 3
Taft
92867 Oran
SFPP,LP 1-021619 1350 N.Maln St, 493190 403.5(d) 1 7 -
orange,CA 92867
Shepard Bros.,Inc. 1-031034 5035.Cypress St,La Habra,CA 90631 325611 417.166,417176 4 7
Shur-Lok Company 1-600297 2541 White Rd, 332722 433.17(a) 2 9 15 New Class]
Irvine,CA 92614 Permit Issued
6535 Caballero Blvd,
Simply Fresh Foods,Inc. 1-531426 C Bld&Buena Park, 311421 403.5(d) 4 11 -
CA 90620
17905 Metzler Ln,
Soldermask,Inc. 1-031341 Huntington Beach, 334412 433.17(a) 6 36 20 Copper,Nickel
CA 92647
South Bay Chrome 1-511383 20015.Grand Ave, 332813 033.11(a) 1 9 7 Class 1 Permit
Santa Ana,CA 92705 Deactivated
South Coast Circuits,Inc. 3500 W.Lake Center
(Bldg 3500 A) 1-011069 or,A Unit,Santa Ana, 334412 433.17(a) 4 24 30
CA 92704
South Coast Circuits,Inc. 3506 Lake Center Dr,
(Bldg 3506 A) 1-011030 ABid&Santa Ana,CA 334412 433.17(a) 4 26 11
927M
Page 18 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
South Coast Circuits,Inc. 3512 W.Lake Center
(Bldg 3512 A) 1-511365 or,A Unit,Santa Ana, 334412 433.17(a) 4 24 26
CA 92704
South Coast Circuits,Inc. 3524 W.Lake Center
(Bldg 3524 A) 1-011054 Dr A Unit,Santa Ana, 334412 433.17(a) 2 18 11
CA 927N
South Coast Water 1-511405 401 s.santa Fe St, 3333181 403.51d) 4 20 5
Santa Ana,CA 92705
Southern California Edison#1 7301 Fenwick ln,
(Mt) 1-031014 Westminster G4 811310 403.5(d) 2 16 17
92683
Southern California Edison#2 7351 Fenwick un,
(Das) 1-031D15 Westminster,CA 811310 4o3.5(d) 2 16 17
92683
Southern California Edison#3 7455 Fenwick In,
(Lars) 1-031016 Westminster,CA 811310 403.51d) 2 13 17
92683
7400 Fenwick Ln,
Southern California Edison ll4 Class 1 Permit
(MSS) 1-031020 West92683 ter.C4 811310 403.51d) - 3 17 Deactivated92683
SPSTechnologies 1-011310 27015.Harbor Blvd, 332722 433.17(a),471.34(a) 3 16 41
Santa Ana,CA 92704
St.John Knits,Inc. 1-071158 17422 Darien Ave, 313310 403.5(d) - - -
Irvine,CA 92614
Stainless Micro-Polish,Inc. 1-021672 1211 N.Grove S[, 332513 433.1]lal 4 24 12
Anaheim CA9280fi
7601 Park Ave,
Star Powder Coating,Inc. 1-531425 Garden Grove,CA 332812 433.17(a) 4 16 11
92841
Statek Corporation(Main) 1-0216U 512 N.Maln St, 334419 469.26(a) 4 19 3
Orange,CA 92868
Statek Corporation(Orange 1449 W.orange
Grove) 1-521777 Grove Ave,B Unit, 334419 469.28(a) 2 12 3
Oran a CA 92868
Stepan Company 1-021674 1208 N.Patt St, 325613 417A06,417.96 4 19 13
Anaheim,CA 92801
4002 Westminster
Stremicks Heritage Foods,LLC 1-021028 Ave,Santa Ana,CA 311511 4D3.51d) 4 15 15
92703
Summit Interconnect,Inc. 1-600012 223 N.Crescent Way, 334412 433.17(a) 4 28 27
Anaheim,CA 92801
Page 19 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division 412,
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
Summit Interconnect,Inc., 1-600060 230 W.Bristol Ln, 334412 433.1](a) 4 14 28
Orange Division Orange,CA 92865
Sunny Delight Beverages Co. 1-021045 1230 rv.Tustin Ave, 312111 403.5(d) 4 11 -
Anaheim Cq 926W
Superior Plating 1-021WO Anaheim,
im,CA Cerritos Ave, 332813 433.1](a) 4 36 26
Anaheim,CA 92805
Superior Processing 1-021403 1115 Las groan Pl, 334412 a33.1]Ial 4 26 12
Placentia CA 928]0
Tayco Engineering,Inc. 1-031012 1074 Hope St,ress,CA W630 334513 433.11Ia1 4 19 1$
CypTaylor-Dunn Manufacturing 1-021123 2114 Ball Rd, 3jj924 433.vIal 3 $ 23
Company Anaheim,CA 92800
TC Cosmotronic,Inc.,DBA 1-571309 16721 Noyes Ave, 334412 433.1](a) 4 19 21
Cosmotronic Irvine,CA 93606
1573 S.Sunkis[St,H
Techplate,Inc. 1-021082 Ste,Anaheim,CA 332813 433.1](a) 4 1 3
92806
Teva Parenteral Medicines, 1-141007 19 Hughes Link, j25412 439.47 4 12 15
Inc. Irvine,CA 92618
Thermal-Vac Technolo Inc. 1-021282 1221 W.struck Ave, j32410 433.11a
�' Orange,CA 92867 ( I 3 12 26 Nickel
Thompson Energy Resources, 1-521773 3351 E.Birch St,Brea, 211111 003.5(d) 4 22 6
LLC CA 92821
Timken Bearing Inspection, U22 Corporate
1-531415 Center Dr,Los 336412 403.5(d) 4 19 4
Inc. Alamitos,CA 90720
15701 Industry Ln,
Tiodize Company,Inc. 1-111132 Huntington Beach, 332813 433.17Ial 4 14 26
CA 92649
Toyota Racing Development 1-071059 335 Baker St Costa
Costa
Mesa CA 92fi 336310 403.5(d) S 18 13 O&O min.
1106 S.Technology
Transline Technology,Inc. 1-021202 Cir,Anaheim,CA 334412 433.17(a) 4 26 11
92905
013.14(c),413.54(c),
Triumph PlOCeSSing-Embee Santa Ana,CA aySt,9205 Class 1vated
Div(Plate) 1-511403 Santa Ana,CA 92]OS 332$13 413.6433.17(3.]4(ch 3 11 12 Deactivated
a33.1]a
Triumph Processing-Embee 2148 S.Hathaway St, 413.14(c),413.54(c), Class l Permit
Div. Anodize 1-513402 Santa Ana,CA 92705 332$13 413.64(c),433.17(a) 3 11 15 Deactivated
Tropitone Furniture Co.,Inc. 1-141163 5Marconi Link, 337124 433.17Ial 2 9 10
Irvine,CA 92618
Page 20 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status qW
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No. Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
TTM Technologies North 1511366 2645 Croddy Way, 334412 433.1](a) 4 29 32
America,L-C.(Crodd ) Santa Ana,CA 92704
TTM Technologies North 1-511359 2640 S.Harbor Blvd, 334412 433.17(a) 4 11 20 Class l Permit
America,LLC.(Harbor)
Santa Ana,CA 92704 Deactivated
Ultra-Pure Metal Finishing, 1-021703 1764 N"Case Sp 332813 433.DIa1 6 33 26
Inc. Orange,CA 92865
United Pharma,LLC 1-531418 2317 Moore Ave,Fullerton,CA 92833 32$412 403.5(d) 6 14 $ pH
Universal Alloy Corp. 1-021706 28711 Mesa Ave, 331318 467.35(c) 5 25 14 Molybdenum
Anaheim CA 92806
1551 E.Orangethome
Universal Molding Co. 1-521836 Ave,Fullerton,CA 332812 433.1](a) 5 36 11
92831
2100 E.Orangethorpe
UOP,LLC 1-521751 Ave,Anaheim,CA 326113 403.5(d) 4 12 3
928M
Van Law Food Products,Inc. 1-531439 2325 Moore Ave, 311941 403.5(d) 5 6 -
Fullerton,CC 92833
Veeco Electra Fab,Inc. 1-021166 1176 N.Osprey Cir, 334412 433.171a1 2 1 11 Class 1 Permit
Anaheim,CA 92807 1 1 Deactivated
VI-Cal Metals,Inc. 1-521846 1400 N.Baxter St, 562920 403.5(d) 4 13 8
Anaheim,CA 92806
Viasystems Technologies 1-521859 3140 E.Coonado St, 334412 433.17(a) 4 28 26
Corporation,LLC Anaheim,CA 92806
Vit-Best Nutrition,Inc. 1-6W010 2832 Dow Ave, 325411 439.47 4 14 20
Tustin,CA 92780
Weber Precision Graphics 1-011354 2730 Shannon St. 323113 403.5(d) 3 3 -
Santa Ana,CA 92704
Weidemann Water 1-021653 1702 E.Rosslynn Ave, 333318 403.5(d) 4 13 -
Conditioners,Inc. Fullerton,CA 92833
1080 W.vth St,
West Newport Oil Company 1-061110 Costa Mesa,CA 211111 403.5(d) 4 11 7
9262]
Western yarn Dyeing,Inc. 1-031114 2011 Raymer Ave,Fullerton,CA 92833 313110 003.5(d) Q 22 1$
Wilco-Placentia Oil Operator, 1-521829 550 Richfield Rd, 211111 403.5(d) 4 10 5
LLC Placentia,CA 92870
Winonics(Brea) 1-031035 660N.Puente Sq 334412 433.111a1 2 6 27
Brea,CA 92821
Page 21 of 22
Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)-Resource Protection Division
Fiscal Year 2017-2018 List of SIUs with Monitoring&Compliance Status
Permit NAICS No.of Agency SMR Pollutant(s) SNC
Facility No Address Code Regulation Inspections Samples Samples in Discharge Status Comment
Violation
1257 State College
Winonics,Inc. 1-021735 Blvd,Fullenon,CA 334412 433.17(a) 3 12 25
92831
17235 Newhope St,
yakult USA,Inc. 1-521850 Fountain Valley,CA 311511 403.51d) 4 14 4
92708
Page 22 of 22
appendix b
SUMMARY OF PRIORITY POLLUTANTS AND
TRACE CONSTITUENTS ANALYSES
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutant Summary,Fiscal Year 2017/18
MONITORING ANALYSIS TOT AVG CONIC UNITS Flow(MGD) Mass(lbs/day)
LOCATION
EFF-001 Ag NO pg/L 87.8 NO
EFF-001 As 2.94 pg/L 87.8 2.08
EFF-001 Be ND pg/L 87.8 NO
EFF-001 CN 3.58 pg/L 87.8 2.62
EFF-001 Cd 0.029 pg/L 87.8 0.021
EFF-001 Cr 0.652 pg/L 87.8 0.477
EFF-001 Cu 5.14 pg/L 87.8 3.76
EFF-001 Hg 4.28 pg/L 87.8 0.003
EFF-001 Ni 11.4 pg/L 87.8 8.35
EFF-001 ORG 14.8 pg/L 87.8 10.8
EFF-001 Pb 0.073 pg/L 87.8 0.053
EFF-001 Sb 1.39 pg/L 87.8 1.02
EFF-001 Se 9.31 pg/L 87.8 6.82
EFF-001 TI ND pg/L 87.8 NO
EFF-001 Zn 29.3 pg/L 87.8 21.5
INF-001 Ag 1.38 pg/L 121 1.39
INF-001 As 2.17 pg/L 121 2.18
INF-001 Be ND pg/L 121 ND
INF-001 CN 2.30 pg/L 121 2.31
INF-601 Cd 0.731 pg/L 121 0.735
INF-001 Cr 6.25 pg/L 121 6.28
INF-601 Cu 97.6 pg/L 121 98.1
INF-001 Hg 142 pg/L 121 0.142
INF-001 Ni 10.6 pg/L 121 10.7
INF401 ORG 36.4 pg/L 121 36.6
INF-001 Pb 2.62 pg/L 121 2.63
INF-001 Sb 1.25 pg/L 121 1.26
INF-001 Se 2.61 pg/L 121 2.62
INF-601 TI NO pg/L 121 ND
INF-601 Zn 169 pg/L 121 170
INF-002 Ag 1.30 pg/L 64.1 0.69
INF-002 As 4.87 pg/L 64.1 2.60
INF-002 Be ND pg/L 64.1 NO
INF-002 CN 1.99 pg/L 64.1 1.06
INF-002 Cd 2.28 pg/L 64.1 1.22
INF-002 Cr 10.5 pg/L 64.1 5.61
INF-002 Cu 118 pg/L 64.1 63.0
INF-002 Hg 189 pg/L 64.1 0.101
INF-002 Ni 14.4 pg/L 64.1 7.69
INF-002 ORG 34.3 pg/L 64.1 18.3
INF-002 Pb 3.32 pg/L 64.1 1.77
INF-002 Sb 1.19 pg/L 64.1 0.636
INF-002 Se 9.70 pg/L 64.1 5.18
INF-002 TI ND pg/L 64.1 NO
INF-002 Zn 218 pg/L 64.1 116
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2017/18
MONITORING NAME Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Deo-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18
LOCATION
EFF-001 Silver NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Arsenic 6.13 pg/L 5.18 pg/L 4.68 pg/L 1.84 pg/L 2.09t/L
L 1I47 pg/L 1.44 pg/L 1.89 pg/L 1.98 pg/L 2.27 pg/L 2.34 pg/L 2.78 pg/L
Beryllium NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO NO
g/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Cadmium NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L 0.218 pg/L NO pg/L g/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L 0.130 pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Cyanide 4.01 pg/L 4.11 pg/L2.85 pg/L 3.37 pg/L 3.66 pg/L g/L 3.53 pg/L 5.11 pg/L 3.40 pg/L
'Chromium ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L 0.785 pg/L 0.689 pg/L 0.525 pg/L 0.927 pg/L 1.09 pg/L 1.02 pg/L 0.890 pg/L 0.950 pg/L 0.950 pg/L
Copper 9.88 pg/L 8.70 pg/L 9.49 pg/L 3.46 pg/L 4.06 MIL3.63 pg/L 3.93 pg/L 3.69 pg/L 5.03 pg/L 3.64 pg/L 2.81 pg/L 2.92 pg/L
Mercury 3.6 ng/L 4.7 ng/L 2 ng/L 3.8 ng/L 4.1 ng/L 3.4 ng/L 4.4 ng/L 5.2 ng/L 4.6 ng/L 5.2 ng/L 5.6 ng/L 4.7 ng/L
Nickel 13.5 pg/L 15.4 pg/L 17.0 pg/L 8.76 pg/L 15.7 pg/L 6.27 pg/L 12.7 pg/L 8.34 pg/L 9.67 pg/L 9.35 pg/L 9.00 pg/L 11.3 pg/L
1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
1,1-Dichloroethane NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
1,2-Dichloroethane NO pg/L JND
pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
1,2-Dichloropropane NO pg/L pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L�ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene NO pg/L pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pglL NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-P-Dioxin NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dichlorophenol NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
2,6-Dinitrotoluene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
2-Chloronapthalene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
2-Chlorophenol NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
2-Nitrophenol NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L 0.830 pg/L 1.56 pg/L
2-Chloroethylvinylelher NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
4-Bromophenyl-Phenyl Ether NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Page 1
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2017/18
MONITORING NAME Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Deo-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18
LOCATION _
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
4-Chlorophenyl-Phenyl Ether ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
4-Nitrophenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Acenaphthene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Acenaphthylene ND pg/L IND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Aldrin ND pg/L ND pg/L
Anthracene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L TND pg/L
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Benzo(a)Anthracene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Benzidine NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo(a)Pyrene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg1L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate ND pg/L IND I pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Chlordane ND pg/L ND pg/L
Chrysene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Di-n-Butyl Phthalate ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L 1.80 pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Di-n-Octyl Phthalate ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO
pglL NO pg/L ND pg/L
Dibenzo (a,h)Anthracene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Dieldrin ND pg/L ND pg/L
Diethylphthalate NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L IND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L #NDpg/L
Dimethylphthalate NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan NO pg/L NO pg/L
Endosulfan I ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan 11 NO pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan Sulfate ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endrin ND pg/L ND pg/L
Fluroanthene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Fluorene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Heptachlor ND pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachlorobenzene ND pg/L ND qg/LND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Hexachlorobutadiene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND— pg/L NO pg/L IND pg/L
Page 2
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2017/18
MONITORING NAME Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Deo-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18
LOCATION _
Hexachloroethane ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO rpg/L ND 'pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Indeno (1,2,3-cd)Pyrene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Isophorone ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Nitrobenzene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1016 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1221 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1232 ND pg/L IND pg/L
PCB- 1242 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1248 NO pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1254 NO pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1260 NO pg/L ND pg/L
Pentachlorophenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Phenanthrene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Phenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Pyrene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Acrolein ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pglL NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Acrylonitrile ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Alpha-BHC ND pg/L NO pg/L
Benzene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Beta-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bis(2-Chloroethoxy) Methane ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L 2.86 pg/L NO pg/L 2.41 pg/L
Bromodichloromethane 2.82 pg/L 3.73 pg/L 1.66 pg/L 2.26 pg/L 2.21 pg/L 2.29 pg/L 8.98 pg/L 6.73 pg/L 2.93 pg/L 2.16 pg/L 2.77 pg/L 4.58 pg/L
Bromofonn ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Bromomethane NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Carbon Tetrachloride ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pd/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Chlorobenzene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Chloroethane ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Chlorofonn 8.40 pg/L 8.25 pg/L 5.97 pg/L 6.08 pg/L 4.05 pg/L 5.49 pg/L 16.6 pg/L 11.7 pg/L 7.94 pg/L 5.75 pg/L 9.77 pg/L 10.6 pg/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Delta-BHC NO pg/L ND pg/L
Dibromochloromethane 0.720 pg/L 1.09 pg/L NO pg/L 0.680 pg/L 0.950 pg/L 0.750 pg/L 3.18 pg/L 2.33 pg/L 0.700 pg/L NO pg/L 0.590 pg/L 1.42 pg/L
Ethylbenzene ND I pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Page 3
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2017/18
MONITORING NAME Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 I Deo-17 Jan-18 I Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18
LOCATION
Gamma-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Methylene Chloride ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L 8.90 pg/L 0.900 pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L FpgIL 1.80
N-Nitrosodiprophylamine ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND pg/L IND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDD ND pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDE ND pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDT ND pg/L ND pg/L
Tetrachloroethene NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Toluene NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Trichloroelhene ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO
pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Vinyl Chloride ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Lead ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L 0.107 pg/L 0.177 pg/L ND pg/L 0.202 pg/L 0.155 pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L 0.240 pg/L ND pg/L
Antimony 1.15 pg/L 1.67 pg/L 1.39 pg/L 1.52 pg/L 1.70 pg/L 1.08 pg/L 1.77 pg/L 1.22 pg/L 1.17 pg/L 1.16 pg/L 1.37 pg/L
pg/L 1.46
Selenium 20.5 pg/L 18.4 pg/L 19.2 pg/L 5.82 pg/L 6.41 pg/L 2.90 pg/L 5.54 pg/L 6.44 pg/L 5.76 pg/L 6.47 pg/L 6.42 pg/L 7.80 pg/L
Thallium ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Zinc 27.7 pg/L 34.9 pg/L 29.6 pg/L 29.4 pg/L 37.6 pg/L 23.7 pg/L 32.9 pg/L 32.7 pg/L 132.6 pg/L 25.6 pg/L 22.0 pg/L 22.8 pg/L
INF-001 Silver 2.54 pg/L 0.869 pg/L 0.803 pg/L 1.30 pg/L 1.89 pg/L 1.15 pg/L 0.415 pg/L 0.940 pg/L 3.17 pg/L 1.30 pg/L 0.950 pg/L 1.20 pg/L
Arsenic 3.14 pg/L 2.64 pg/L 2.58 pg/L 1.72 pg/L 1.55 pg/L 1.93 pg/L 2.02 pg/L 1.69 pg/L 1.88 pg/L 2.29 pg/L 2.26 pg/L 2.33 pg/L
Beryllium NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Cadmium NO pg/L 0.610 pg/L 0.611 pg/L 1.61 pg/L 0.914 pg/L 0.580 pg/L 1.20 pg/L 0.795 pg/L 0.630 pg/L 0.780 pg/L 0.510 pg/L 0.530 pg/L
Cyanide 3.11 pg/L 2.80 pg/L NO pg/L 5.06 pg/L 2.36 pg/L 4A6 pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L 2.90 pg/L
Chromium 5.44 pg/L 14.31 pg/L 5.71 pg/L 13.4 pg/L 5.54 pg/L 5.37 pg/L 7.64 pg/L 5.54 pg/L 5.97 pg/L 4.75 pg/L 6.40 pg/L 4.92 pg/L
Copper 113 pg/L 93.6 pg/L 104 pg/L 97.8 pg/L 107 pg/L 86.2 pg/L 92.5 pg/L 91.7 pg/L 95.2 pg/L 91.7 pg/L 95.8 pg/L 103 pg/L
Mercury 160 ng/L 130 ng/L 110 ng/L 130 ng/L 180 ng/L 120 ng/L 130 ng/L 130 ng/L 140 ng/L 130 ng/L 120 ng/L 220 ng/L
Nickel 14.3 pg/L I10.4 pg/L 13.1 pg/L 19.90 pg/L 11.3 pg/L 8.87 pg/L 10.8 p I9.98 pg/L 8.70 pg/L 7.76 pg/L 10.3 pg/L 111.2 pg/L
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO
pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
1,1,22-Tetrachloroethane ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND a/LND
pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND 1 pg/L
1,1-Dichloroethane ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
1,2-Dichloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND- pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Page 4
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2017/18
MONITORING NAME Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 I Deo-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18
LOCATION _ _
1,2-Dichloropropane ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO rpg/L N[5--'pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND pg/L NO pg/L IND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dichlorophenol ND pg/L IND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2,6-Dinitrotoluene NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2-Chloronapthalene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2-Chlorophenol NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
2-Nitrophenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO
pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2-Chloroethylvinylelher ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO
pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO
pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
4-Bromophenyl-Phenyl Ether ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L 2.33 pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
4-Chlorophenyl-Phenyl Ether ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
4-Nitrophenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Acenaphthene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/LIIIND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Acenaphthylene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/LO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Aldrin NO pg/L ND pg/L
Anthracene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Benzo(a)Anthracene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Benzidine NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pd/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Benzo(a)Pyrene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L IND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L 1.90 pg/L 2.10 pg/L 1.40 pg/L 1.30 pg/L 1.90 pg/L NO pg/L 4.00 pg/L I5.30 pg/L 4.10 pg/L
Chlordane ND pg/L ND pg/L
Chrysene ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L
Di-n-Butyl Phthalate ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L 1.90 pg/L 1.40 pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L 1.60 pg/L 1.90 pg/L 2.40 pg/L 1.70 pg/L 1.50 pg/L
Page 5
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2017/18
MONITORING NAME Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 I Deo-17 1an-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18
LOCATION
Di-n-Octyl Phthalate ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO rpg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO EgILND pg/L
Dibenzo (a,h)Anthracene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO ND pg/L
Dieldrin ND pg/L ND pg/L
Diethylphthalate 4.00 pg/L 3.60 pg/L 3.70 pg/L 2.20 pg/L 3.30 pg/L 4.00 pg/L 2.70 pg/L 3.20 pg/L 3.20 pg/L 3.70 pg/L 5.00 pg 3.70 pg/L
Dimethylphthalate ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L AND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Endosulfan ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan I ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan II ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan Sulfate NO pg/L ND pg/L
Endrin NO pg/L ND pg/L
Fluroanthene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/LD pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Fluorene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Heptachlor ND pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachlorobenzene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachlorobutadiene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Hezachlorocyclopentadiene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachloroethane ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Indeno (1,2,3-cd)Pyrene ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Isophorone ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Nitrobenzene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1016 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1221 NO pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1232 NO pg/L NO pg/L
PCB- 1242 NO pg/L NO pg/L
PCB- 1248 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1254 NO pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1260 ND pg/L ND pg/L
Pentachlorophenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Phenanthrene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Phenol 17.7 pg/L 12.2 pg/L NO pg/L 9.46 pg/L 11.3 pg/L 13.7 pg/L 11.4 pg/L 14.5 pg/L 12.4 pg/L 15.1 pg/L 14.8 pg/L 15.8 pg/L
Pyrene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pgAL NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Acrolein ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Acrylonitrile ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Alpha-BHC ND pg/L NO pg/L
Page 6
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2017/18
MONITORING NAME Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Deo-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18
LOCATION
Benzene ND pg/L#NDpg/L
NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO 'pg/L NO pg/L
Beta-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bis(2-Chloroethoxy) Methane ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/LtNDpg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/Lpg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 10.6 pg/L 11.4 pg/L 6.72 pg/L 8.87 pg/L 8.85 pg/L 17.75 pg/L 7.58 pg/L 6.42 pg/L 8.79 pg/L 14.8 pg/L 10.4 pg/L
Bromodichloromethane ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Bromofonn ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L -10.780 pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Bromomethane NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Carbon Tetrachloride NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Chlorobenzene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Chloroethane NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Chloroform 4.10 pg/L 4.10 pg/L 3.56 pg/L 3.90 pg/L 2.50 pg/L 2.78 pg/L 1.71 pg/L 3.00 pg/L 4.25 pg/L 6.97 pg/L 2.34 pg/L 3.73 pg/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Delta-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Dibromochloromethane ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Ethylbenzene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L IND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Gamma-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Methylene Chloride 1.26 pg/L 1.00 pg/L 3.60 pg/L 11.6 pg/L 1.20 pg/L 3.70 pg/L 1.40 pg/L 7.70 pg/L NO pg/L 7.40 pg/L 0.900 pg/L 3.60 pg/L
N-Nitrosodiprophylamine ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO ng/L ND ng/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L 198 ng/L 237 ng/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND ng/L NO ng/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDD NO pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDE NO pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDT NO pg/L ND pg/L
Tetrachloroethene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Toluene 1.88 pg/L 1.49 pg/L 1.56 pg/L NO pg/L 2.25 pg/L NO pg/L 2.06 pg/L NO pg/L 1.61 pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Trichloroethene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Vinyl Chloride ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L#ND
g/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND
pg/L
Lead ND pg/L 2.01 pg/L 2.08 pg/L 3.55 pglL 2.38 pg/Lg/L 3.87 pg/L 2.47 pg/L 2.05 pg/L 3.23 pg/L 5.53 pg/L 2.6 pg/LAntimony 1.15 pg/L 1.71 pg/L 1.21 pg/L 1.27 pglL 1.30 pg/Lg/L 1.68 pg/L 0.919 pg/L 0.950 pg/L 1.19 pg/L 1.14 pg/L 1.20 pg/LSelenium 4.43 pg/L 4.26 pg/L 4.33 pg/L 2.08 pg/L 3.57 pg/Lg/L ND pg/L 2.56 pg/L 2.50 pg/L 2.90 pg/L 2.24 pg/L 2.47 pg/L
Thallium ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Page 7
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2017/18
MONITORING NAME Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Deo-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18
LOCATION _
Zinc 191 pg/L 160 pg/L 189 pg/L 181 pglL 173 pg-IL 150 pg/L 198 pg/L 172 pg/L 153 pg/L 142 pg/L 159 pg/L 156 pg/L
INF-002 Silver 1.47 pg/L 2.41 pg/L 0.972 pg/L 1.58 pg/L NO pg/L 1.23 pg/L 0.354 pg/L 1.27 pg/L 2.41 pg/L 1.48 pg/L 1.25 pg/L 1.12 pg/L
Arsenic 8.67 pg/L 7.98 pg/L 8.20 pg/L 3.25 pg/L 3.22 pg/L 2.84 pg/L 3.45 pg/L 3.46 pg/L 3.88 pg/L 4.12 pg/L 4.38 pg/L 4.94 pg/L
Beryllium ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Cadmium ND pg/L 2.15 pg/L NO pg/L 14.8 pg/L 1.88 pg/L 1.74 pg/L 1.23 pg/L 1.26 pg/L 1.24 pg/L 1.06 pg/L 0.810 pg/L 1.19 pg/L
Cyanide 3.53 pg/L 3.19 pg/L 1.22 pg/L 1.60 pg/L 1.79 pg/L 3.81 pg/L 2.81 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Chromium 9.41 pg/L 8.04 pg/L 9.21 pg/L 11.6 pg/L 8.10 pg/L 11.6 pg/L 10.3 pg/L 9.75 pg/L 11.0 pg/L 15.0 pg/L 13.1 pg/L 8.88 pg/L
Copper 138 pg/L 134 pg/L 125 pg/L 138 pg/L 95.6 pg/L 104 pg/L 93.6 pg/L 105 pg/L 123 pg/L 107 pg/L 131 pg/L 123 pg/L
Mercury 200 ng/L 260 ng/L 54 ng/L 160 ng/L 170 ng/L 180 ng/L 240 ng/L 110 ng/L 270 ng/L 180 ng/L 260 ng/L 180 ng/L
Nickel 20.4 pg/L 19.4 pg/L 19.8 pg/L 19.1 pg/L 12.7 pg/L 9.06 pg/L 9.41 pg/L 11.0 pg/L 10.7 pg/L 13.4 pg/L 15.7 pg/L 11.8 pg/L
1,1,1-Trichloroethane NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
1,1-Dichloroethane ND pg/L NO I pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
1,2-Dichloroethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
1,2-Dichloropropane ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L IND pg/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dichlorophenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pglL NO pglL ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pglL NO pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pd/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pd/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pd/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2-Chloronapthalene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pd/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
1Chlorophenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2-Nitrophenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2-Chloroethylvinylether ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pdIL NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND Ipg/L ND pg/L NO pgAL NO pg/L NO pg/L ND Ipg/L
4-Bromophenyl-Phenyl Ether ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
4-Chlorophenyl-Phenyl Ether ND i pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND- pg/L NO Jwp
D pg/L
Page 8
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2017/18
MONITORING NAME Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Deo-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18
LOCATION _
4-Nitrophenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Acenaphthene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L IND pg/L
Acenaphthylene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Aldrin ND pg/L ND pg/L
Anthracene ND pg/L INO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
1,2-Di phenyl hydrazine ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo(a)Anthracene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Benzidine ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo(a)Pyrene NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L 1.80 pg/L 2.50 pg/L 1.50 pg/L ND pg/L 2.00 pg/L NO pg/L 4.50 pg/L 4.00 pg/L 3.40 pg/L
Chlordane ND pg/L ND pg/L
Chrysene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Di-n-Butyl Phthalate ND pg/L NO pg/L 3.80 pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L 1.80 pg/L 1 pg L 1.50.20 pg/L 1.70 pg/L 2.40 pg/L 1.30 pg/L
Di-n-Octyl Phthalate ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Dibenzo (a,h)Anthracene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Dieldrin ND pg/L ND pg/L
Diethylphthalate 3.70 pg/L 2.00 pg/L 2.50 pg/L 1.70 pg/L 2.40 pg/L 2.50 pg/L 2.20 pg/L ND I pg/L NO pg/L 2.60 pg/L 1.70 pg/L 2.00 pg/L
Dimethylphthalate ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L 0.890 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan NO pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan I NO pg/L ND pg/L
Endosulfan II NO pg/L NO pg/L
Endosulfan Sulfate ND pg/L ND pg/L
Endrin NO pg/L ND pg/L
Fluroanthene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Fluorene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Heptachlor ND pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachlorobenzene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachlorobutadiene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Hexachloroethane ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Indeno (1,2,3-cd)Pyrene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO— pg/L NO Jwp
D pg/L
Page 9
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2017/18
MONITORING NAME Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Deo-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18
LOCATION _
Isophorone ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Nitrobenzene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1016 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1221 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1232 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1242 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1248 ND pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1254 NO pg/L ND pg/L
PCB- 1260 NO pg/L ND pg/L
Pentachlorophenol ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Phenanthrene NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Phenol 2.15 pg/L ND pg/L 10.1 pg/L 2.77 pg/L 6.05 pg/L 4.86 pg/L 3.38 pg/L 25.2 pg/L 4.94 pg/L 4.60 pg/L 3.12 pg/L 1.97fppgg/L
/L
Pyrene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND /L
Acrolein ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND
Acrylonitrile ND pg/L IND I pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Alpha-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Benzene 0.440 pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Beta-BHC ND pg/L NO pg/L
Bis(2-Chloroethoxy) Methane ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate 17.2 pg/L 10.9 pg/L 11.5 pg/L 6.18 pg/L 11.5 pg/L 12.8 pg/L 12.5 pg/L 6.63 pg/L 5.45 pg/L 13.5 pg/L 12.3 pg/L 111.1 pg/L
Bromodichloromethane NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Bromofonn NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Bromomethane NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Carbon Tetrachloride ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Chlorobenzene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Chloroethane ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Chlorofonn 2.60 pg/L 2.54 pg/L 2.36 pg/L 2.03 pg/L 2.58 pg/L 1.51 pg/L 2.07 pg/L 2.63 pg/L 2.82 pg/L 1.99 pg/L 1.68 pg/L 2.54 pg/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Delta-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Dibromochloromethane ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Ethylbenzene 0.230 pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Gamma-BHC ND pg/L ND pg/L
Methylene Chloride 1.15 Ipg/L IND Ipg/L I2.00 Ipg/L NO pg/L 1.40 pg/L 7.80 pg/L ND pg/L 85.5 pg/L NO pg/L 1.00 pg/L 1.00 pg/L 5.90 pg/L
Page 10
Orange County Sanitation District Priority Pollutants Analyses Results, Fiscal Year 2017/18
MONITORING NAME Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Deo-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18
LOCATION _
N-Nitrosodiprophylamine ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L IND pg/L
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDD ND pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDE ND pg/L ND pg/L
4,4'-DDT ND pg/L ND pg/L
Tetrachloroethene ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L tND pg/L
Toluene 3.41 pg/L NO pg/L 1.66 pg/L NO pg/L 1.97 pg/L 1.56 pg/L ND pg/L 2.38 pg/L 3.71 pg/L 2.18 pg/L NO pg/L 2.30 pg/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Trichloroethene NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L
Vinyl Chloride ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pglL NO pg/L ND pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Lead 1.97 pg/L 2.62 pg/L 2.49 pg/L 3.03 pg/L 2.76 pg/L 3.10 pg/L 4.79 pg/L 3.10 pg/L 3.08 pg/L 3.63 pg/L 6.29 pg/L 3.03 pg/L
Antimony 1.16 pg/L 1.28 pg/L 1.19 pg/L 1.44 pg/L 0.867 pg/L 1.17 pg/L 1.73 pg/L 0.952 pg/L 0.960 pg/L 1.20 pg/L 1.19
p9 p9
Selenium 20.8 pg/L 21.0 pg/L 22.8 pg/L 4.63 pg/L 3.48 pg/L 6.11 pg/L 5.48 pg/L 6.25 pg/L 4.98 pg/L 6.43 pg/L 7.38 pg/L 7.11 pg/L
Thallium ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L NO pg/L ND pg/L
Zinc 243 pg/L 236 pg/L 232 pg/L 219 pg/L 211 pg/L 175 pg/L 218 pg/L 214 pg/L 213 pg/L 211 pg/L 235 pg/L 203 pg/L
Page 11
appendix c
PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
PRIORITY POLLUTANTS LIST
Elements Purueable Organic Compounds Base/Neutral Extractable Organic
(EPA Method 624) Compounds(Continued)
Antimony
Arsenic Acrolein Butyl Benzyl Phthalate
Beryllium Acrylonitrile 2-Chloronaphthalene
Cadmium Benzene 4-Chlorophenyl-Phenyl Ether
Chromium Bromomethane Chrysene
Copper Bromodichloromethane Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
Lead Bromoform Di-N-Butyl Phthalate
Mercury Carbon Tetrachloride 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Nickel Chlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Selenium 2-Chloroethylvinylether 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Silver Chloroform 3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
Thallium Chloromethane Diethylphthalate
Zinc Dibromochloromethane Dimethylphthalate
1,1-Dichloroethane 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Other Constituents 1,2-Dichloroethane 2,6-Dinitrotoluene
1,1-Dichloroethene Di-N-Octyl Phthalate
Asbestos Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
Cyanide 1,2-Dichloropropane Fluroanthene
Cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Fluorene
Pesticides and PCB's Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Hexachlorobenzene
(EPA Method 608) Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene
Methylene Chloride Hexachloroethane
Alddn 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Alpha-BHC Tetrachloroethene Indeno(1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
Beta-BHC 1,1,1-Tdchloroethane Isophorone
Delta-BHC 1,1,2-Tdchloroelhane Naphthalene
Gamma-BHC Trichloroelhene Nitrobenzene
Chlordane Toluene N-Nitrosodimethylamine
4,4'-DDD Vinyl Chloride N-Nitrosodiprophylamine
4,4'-DDE N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
4,4'-DDT Base/Neutral Extractable Organic Phenanthrene
Dieldrin Compounds (EPA Method 625) Pyrene
Endosulfan I 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlordibenzo-P-Dioxin
Endosulfan 11 Acenaphthene 1,2,4-Tiichlorobenzene
Endosulfan Sulfate Acenaphthylene
Endrin Anthracene Acid Extractable Organic
Endrin Aldehyde Benzidene Compounds(EPA Method 625)
Heptachlor Benzo(a)Anthracene
Heptachlor Epoxide Benzo(b) Fluoranthene 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
PCB-1016 Benzo(k) Fluroanthene 2-Chlorophenol
PCB-1221 Benzoe(a)Pyrene 2,4-Dichlorophenol
PCB-1232 Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene 2,4-Dimethylphenol
PCB-1242 Bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether 2,4-Dinitrophenol
PCB-1248 Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane 2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol
PCB-1254 Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate 2-Nitrophenol
PCB-1260 Bis(dichloroisopropyl) Ether 4-Nitrophenol
Toxaphene 4-Bromophenyl-Phenyl Ether Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
appendix d
FEES/PENALTIES FOR NON-COMPLIANCES
Orange County Sanitation District
Fees / Penalties for Non-Compliances
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
Facility Invoice Date Amount Item Enforcement ID
A& R Powder Coating, Inc. 2/15/2018 $260.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00022076
Active Plating, Inc. 5/15/2018 $535.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00023569
Alloy Tech Electropolishing, Inc. 4/1/2018 $535.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00022661
Andres Technical Plating 8/10/2017 $535.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00018601
Andres Technical Plating 11/15/2017 $425.00 OC Register-SNC Notice&Publication Fees 2017-00019895
Boeing Company(Graham) 11/15/2017 $605.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00020022
Bristol Industries 9/1/2017 $570.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00018602
Bristol Industries 11/1/2017 $535.00 1 Notice of Violation 2017-00019690
Bristol Industries 11/1/2017 $570.00 1 Notice of Violation 2017-00019691
Cadillac Plating, Inc. 10/1/2017 $260.00 lNotice of Violation 2017-00019183
Cadillac Plating, Inc. 10/15/2017 $260.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00019184
Cartel Electronics 11/1/2017 $535.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00020035
Cartel Electronics - $80,965.80 Administrative Complaint Settlement Agreemen 2017-00021124
Circuit Technology, Inc. 4/1/2018 $535.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00022621
D.F.Stauffer Biscuit Co., Inc. 6/1/2018 $508.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00023364
El Toro Meat Shop 8/1/2017 $233.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00018234
El Toro Meat Shop 11/1/2017 $233.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00019906
El Toro Meat Shop 3/1/2018 $233.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00022244
Electron Plating III, Inc. 1/1/2018 $543.00 lNotice of Violation 2017-00020836
Electron Plating III, Inc. 2/1/2018 $535.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00021642
Electronic Precision Specialties,Inc. 11/15/2017 $535.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00020070
Excello Circuits Manufacturing Corp. 11/1/2017 $535.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00020021
FMH Aerospace Corp DBA FMH Corpor 7/1/2017 $260.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00017656
FMH Aerospace Corp DBA FMH Corpor 5/1/2018 $535.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00022982
Green Clean Water&Waste Services 11/15/2017 $260.00 OC Register-SNC Publication Fee 2017-00020226
Hanson-Loran Co., Inc. 11/15/2017 $508.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00020071
Harbor Truck Bodies, Inc. 7/1/2017 $535.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00017827
House Foods America Corporation 1/1/2018 $233.00 lNotice of Violation 2017-00021009
Kinsbursky Brothers Supply, Inc. 3/1/2018 $535.00 1 Notice of Violation 2018-00022243
Linco Industries, Inc. 8/1/2017 $574.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00018235
Linco Industries, Inc. 10/15/2017 $574.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00019677
LM Chrome Corporation 9/1/2017 $225.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00018618
LM Chrome Corporation 2/15/2018 $225.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00022082
LM Chrome Corporation 6/15/2018 $500.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00023831
LSW Enterprises, LLC 4/1/2018 $233.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00022611
Manufactured Packaging Products 5/1/2018 $570.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00023178
Platinum Surface Coating, Inc. 6/15/2018 $500.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00023830
Precision Anodizing&Plating, Inc. 5/1/2018 $535.00 lNotice of Violation 2018-00023829
Precision Circuits West, Inc. 6/15/2018 $535.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00024009
Prudential Overall Supply 8/1/2017 $299.00 Notice of Violation 2017-018378
Pulmuone Wild
wood,Inc. 7/1/2017 $508.00 Notice of Violation 2017-0000017330
Pulmuone Wildwood,Inc. 7/1/2017 $508.00 lNotice of Violation 2017-00017591
Page 1 of 2
Orange County Sanitation District
Fees / Penalties for Non-Compliances
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
Facility Invoice Date Amount Item Enforcement ID
Pulmuone Wildwood,Inc. 7/1/2017 $233.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00017592
Pulmuone Wildwood,Inc. 7/1/2017 $233.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00017593
Pulmuone Wildwood,Inc. 11/1/2017 $233.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00019905
Pulmuone Wildwood,Inc. 12/1/2017 $233.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00020310
Pulmuone Wildwood,Inc. 1/1/2018 $233.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00021012
Pulmuone Wildwood,Inc. 2/15/2018 $233.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00021819
Pulmuone Wildwood,Inc. - $35,000.00 Administrative Complaint Settlement Agreemen 2017-00020019
Q-Flex Inc. 12/1/20171 $535.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00019840
Rigid-Flex Plus 11/15/2017 $425.00 OC Register-SNC Notice&Publication Fees 2017-00020225
Rolls-Royce HTC 8/1/2017 $535.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00018379
5&C Oil Co., Inc. 1/15/2018 $574.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00021306
Santana Services 11/15/2017 $425.00 OC Register-SNC Notice&Publication Fees 2017-00020228
Soldermask,Inc. 8/1/2017 $570.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00018414
Soldermask,Inc. 5/1/2018 $260.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00023177
Ultra-Pure Metal Finishing, Inc. 8/15/2017 $535.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00017655
United Pharma,LLC 111/15/2017 $233.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00019907
United Pharma,LLC 12/1/2017 $233.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00020309
United Pharma,LLC 1/1/2018 $233.00 Notice of Violation 2017-00021010
Universal Alloy Corp. 2/1/2018 $260.00 Notice of Violation 2018-00021E 1
Page 2 of 2
appendix e
PUBLIC NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANTLY
NON-COMPLIANT INDUSTRIES
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, )
) as.
County of Orange )
1 am a citizen of the United States and a resident
of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of PROOF OF PUBLICATION
eighteen years,and not a party to or interested in
the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk
of The Orange County Register, a newspaper
of general circulation, published in the city of PUBLIC NOTICE
Santa Ana, County of Orange, and which news- In accordance with the Puelc Particlaellon daulrements of w CPR
Part db in the enforcement of National Pretreatment standards and
paper has been adjudged to be a newspaper of ascefinel by4DCFR4e3.e(0(7)(W1l0,the Orange County Sonitatim
District(OCSD)is hereby Publishing the following list of bermiffees
general circulation by the Superior Court of the who,during July 1,3017 through June 30,3010,were Identified as
Industries in slgnifkanf noncamPliance with wastewater discharge
County of Orange, State of California,under the standards. An Industry in significant noncompliance Is defined as
follows:
date of November 19, 1905, Case No. A-21046, m Chronic violations of discharge limits occurring when 66%or
that the notice, of which the annexed is a lure more of all measurements exceed the discharge limits for the
same Pollutanl.
printed copy,bas been published in each regular s Acute violations of discharge limits occurring when 33% or
more of all measurements are a malor violation of the
and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any discharge limits.
m Failure to Provide required moms Including,but not lim0ed to,
supplement thereof on the following dates, to Periodic sel6meenitoring.reports and reports with compliance
schedules within 45 buys of the due date.
wit: m Failure to accurately recent noncompliano,with discharge Iim
Its or env other requirements applicable to the user pursuant to
October 18,2018 OC3D3 Wastewater Discharge Regulation(ordinance).
e Any other violation or group of violatons, which OCSD
"I certify (or declare) under the penalty of determines will ooversely affect the Implementaflon of the
perjury under the laws of the State of California Pretreatment program.
OCSD hen taken Noncurrent!action against these Permiffson. The
that the foregoing is Due and coRCCf': malorih of the com itittz listed below have implemented adequate
co anve actions and may be in compliance with taro wastewatr e
Executed at Santa Ana, Orange County, mdhchamgahe rOwofthedW OF%Ispubiiwtim.
California,on
mamemsaga
Date: October 18,2018
...a..,.r.w..k ,.nw m..�w
w...r...w...w..w,.�
PPDIW:Orargeepumv Regskr Oawberlaall/ i11MWbwNY�
C/
Signature: Sandra mpos
The Orange County Register
2190 S.Towne Centre Place
Anaheim,CA 92806
(714)796-2209
appendix f
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Resource Protection Division of the Orange County Sanitation District wishes to acknowledge the
following people for their valuable contributions to this report:
OCSD Resource Protection Division
Roya Sohanaki.............................................. Reviewer/Writer/Signatory, Resource Protection Manager
Ted Gerber................................................................................Reviewer/Writer, Engineering Supervisor
Lori McKinley......................................................Report Coordinator/Writer, Sr. Environmental Specialist
Pegah Behravan.............................................................................................Writer, Engineer
Jason Daniel.....................................................................................................................Writer, Engineer
Brian Finkelstein...............................................................................Writer, Associate Engineer
Tom Gaworski..................................................Writer/Reviewer, Principal Environmental Specialist
Kiran Kaur.....................................................................................................Writer, Engineer
Mark Kawamoto........................................................................Writer/Reviewer, Engineering Supervisor
Mile Kleinbergs...........................................................................................Writer/Reviewer, Sr. Engineer
Jamie Malpetle.......................................................................Writer,Source Control Supervisor
Michael Murray.................................................................................Writer, Associate Engineer
Leyte Perez..................................................................Writer, Principal Environmental Specialist
Jonathon Powell..............................................................................................Writer,Associate Engineer
Merrill Seiler..............................................................................Writer, Principal Environmental Specialist
Chris Stacklin ...................................................................................................................Writer, Engineer
Tom Walker.....................................................................................................Writer. Associate Engineer
MikeZedek...................................................................................._.....,.........,.................Writer. Engineer
OCSD Public Affairs, Laboratory, Monitoring and Compliance. Operations.
Financial Management Staff
Jeff Armstrong............ _....,...._..............._.........__.........___.__...Environmental Supervisor
Deirdre Bingman ............ .........................................................Writer, Principal Environmental Specialist
Angela Brandt..,..... __..........................................................................Writer,Amounting Supervisor
Dindo Carrillo...,,_. . .........................................................................Writer, Sr. Environmental Specialist
Gregg Deterding ..............................................................................Cover Design, Graphics Coordinator
Robert Gamber.................................................................................Writer, Sr. Environmental Specialist
Matthew Garchow...............................................Analytical Data/Appendices, Principal Info Tech Analyst
Umesh Murthy...........................................................................................Writer, Engineering Supervisor
Cann Nguyen...............................................................................................Writer, Laboratory Supervisor
Christie Shiang..................................................................................Writer,Assistant Engineer
Cristina Stanford ...............................................................................................Writer, Senior Accountant
Cindy Velluml.......................................................................Writer. Sr. Environmental Specialist
Outside Agency Contributors
Marce Billings .........................................................Data Preparation, Source Control Supervisor,JCSD
Benjamin Burgett.........................................Data Preparation, Source Control Specialist II,W MWD
Andy Coady ..................................................Data Preparation, Environmental Control Officer, SBMWD
Marlyn Draper ..........................................Data Preparation, Source Control Program Manager,WMWD
Elizabeth Duarte.............................................Writer/Data Preparation,Executive Secretary, IRWD
Dan DuCasse........................................................Data Preparation, Sewer Operations Manager,JCSD
Lucas Gilbert......Writer/Data Preparation/Reviewer, Manager of Permitting and Pretreatment, SAWPA
Richard Haller ........................_................_..................................................General Manager, SAWPA
Richard Lao..............................................Writer/Reviewer, Regulatory Compliance Analyst, IRWD
Dennis Martz...................................................Data Preparation, Source Control Manager, EMW D
Regina Patterson ................Agency Coordinator/Writer/Data Preparation, Executive Assistant,SAWPA
Michael Plasencia .....................Writer/Data Preparation, Sr. Pretreatment Program Specialist,SAWPA
Craig Proctor...............................Data Preparation, Pretreatment and Source Control Supervisor, IEUA
Carlos Quintero ......iPACS Coordination/Data Preparation, Sr. Project Manager,SAWPA
David Ruh]...................................................................Reviewer/Engineering Manager. SAWPA
Sonya San Juan...........................iPACS Coordination/Data Preparation, Business Analyst, SAWPA
Frank Soto ..................... Writer/Data Preparation, Sr. Scientist, IRWD
Bob Tincher ....................................................Data Preparation,Water Resources Manager,SBVMWD
Sara Villa ...........................................................Data Preparation, Sr.Administrative Assistant,SAWPA
appendix g
IRWD SAMPLING
APPENDIX g
2017/18 Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD)
Quarterly Priority Pollutant Monitoring
Sampling is performed quarterly by Regulatory Compliance personnel on the influent,effluent,and sludge.
The results for MWRP influent, effluent, and sludge are shown in this appendix. Two types of sampling
are performed:
1. Grab samples are collected at each location for Volatile Organic Priority Pollutants and cyanide.
2. Composite samples are collected for Base/Neutrals and Acids Extractables, Inorganic Priority
Pollutants, Pesticides/Polychlorinated Biphenyls at each location. This sampling is performed
with an automatic sampler that collects discrete,flow-paced samples over a 24-hour period. The
composite samples are collected in 5-gallon glass bottles, and then distributed out into the
appropriate glass or plastic bottle for preservation and storage.
The collection points for the samples are as follows:
• Influent: Collected from the headworks,just downstream of grit basin.
• Effluent: Collected at the end of the chlorine contact basin(CCB)but downstream of where
the CCB effluent and ultraviolet(l1V)disinfected effluent are combined,just prior to
entering the recycled water distribution system.
• Sludge: Collected at the flow meter vault on the MPS-3 force main.
Cyanide analyses are performed by Weck Laboratories in the City of Industry, California. All remaining
analyses are preserved, refrigerated,and analyzed by IRWD. IRWD supplies all analysis containers with
the proper preservative.
The detection limits shown in the results are the limits for that particular sample. The detection limit may
vary from the laboratory and from sample to sample based on QA/QC analysis and the degree of sample
dilution.
APPENDIX
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR INFLUENT, EFFLUENT AND SLUDGE
tell test resWts In a exce tas noted
IG14/2017 1/3/418 4/3201B AVERAGE AVERAGE
Semple Date 711 P/2017 10/1V2017 1/23/2018 5/2/2018 2017-2018 20162017 ML
MIN ML
INFLUENT
Antimony NO NO NO NO NO 0.23 2.50 250 250 2,60 2.50 2.50
Arsenic NO NO NO NO No 1.14 5.00 5.00 9.00 1 5.00 500 5,00
Beryllium NO NO ND ND ND NO 2.50 250 2.50 2,50 2.50 _ 2.50
Cadmium NO NO NO ND ND NO 1.25 125 125 125 1.25 125
Chomium NO NO NO 3.83 0.96 2.82 250 250 250 250 2.50 _ 2.50
Copper 34.80 64,20 61.20 74.1a 58.58 65.70 2.50 250 250 250 2.50 2.50
Lead NO NO NO ND ND 0.26 2.6D 2.60 2.60 250 2.50 2.50
Mercury 0.05 0.04 NO NO 0.02 0.01 o.ol 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.02
Nickel 3.58 5.28 15.SO 4.16 1A3 6.10 250 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50
Selenium NO 3.49 ND 3.48 174 251 250 2.60 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.60
Silver NO NO NO ND NO 0.12 1.25 1,25 1.25 1.25 L25 125
Thallium NO NO NO NO NO 0.285 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Soo 5,00
Total C anide 10.00 2000. 1600 13,00 14.50 6675 S.00 5.00 20,00 25.00 5.00 5.00 _
Zinc 7870 155.00 172.00 155.00 140.18 16175 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2,50
10/11/2017 1/3/2018 4/3/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE
Sample Oate 71IV2017 10/1272017 1/23/2018 5/212018 2017-2018 20164017 ML
MIN ML
EFFLUENT
Anthor, NO NO NO ND ND 0.13 OSo 0.50 050 0.50 0.50 11).50
Arsenic 1.94 1.29 NO 1.30 1.13 1.66 1A0 i W 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Be Ilium ND NO NO ND NO ND 050 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Cadmium NO NO ND ND ND ND 025 0 02s 0.25 0.25 0,25
Chromium NO ND_ _ NO N6 NO NO 0.50 0.50 0.50 U.50 0.50 0,50
Copper 7,75 5.00 5.92 5.91 3.30 7.17 1 0,50 0.50 0.50 D.60 0.50
Lead NO NO NO NO NO NO 0.5D 0.50 0.50 0.50 D.50 0,50
Page 1
APPENDIX
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF INORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR INFLUENT, EFFLUENT AND SLUDGE
all test results In u I exce t as noted
Me,cOry NO NO ND NO NO NO 0.01 0.01 0.01 OA1 OA1 0.01
Nickel 3.20 3.10 3.60 3.22 3.30 2,47 O.60 0.50 0.50 O50 050 0,50
Selenium 1.m 1.44 0.99 1,71 1.36 171 0.50 Oat) 0.50 0.5p 0.50 0.50
Silver NO ND NO NO NO NO 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0,25
Thallium NO ND ND NO NO NO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00, 1.00
Total C anide NO ND ND NO NO NO 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Zinc 551 57.8 64,50 56,80 55.38 49.55 0.50 050 0.50 0.50 0.50 0,50
10/4/2017 1/3/2018 4/02018 AVERAGE AVERAGE
SaropleDate 7/12/2017 10/11/2017 1/24/2018 5/G2018 20172018 2016-2017 NL
MIN ML
SLUDGE
Antimony NO ND 6.80 277 2.27 222 2.50 2,50 50.00 5.00 2.50 2S0
Arsenic NO ND 33.40 14.30 11.93 0.90 5.00 5,00 100.00 10.00 500 500
Be Ilium NO NO ND NO NO NO 2.50 2.50 50.00 500 250 150
Gadmium NO NO 4.04 1.30 104 1,03 1.25 1.25 25.00 2.50 125 1 125
CNromium ND 51.10 8610 19.70 392E 18.18 2,50 2.50 5000 5,00 2.50 2.50
Copleer 60.20 1 3660.00 1070.00 773.00 159580 756A8 2.50 2.50 1 50.00 6A0 2.50 250
IOW NO NO 49.70 11.50 15,30 880 2S0 25O 50.00 5.00 2.50 2.5D
Mercury 0.06 2.81 0.28 0.36 0.88 0.28 0,05 0.05 8SD 0.20 0,10 0.05
Nickel ].17 139.00 137,00 3440 79.39 31.83 250 2.50 50.00 5.00 250 2.50
Selenium 345 6050 40.30 2040 31.11 2050. 2SO 2.5D 50.00 5.00 2S0 2.50
Silver NO 2520 17.40 1730 14.98 368 1.26 125 25.00 2.50 125 1.25
Thallium NO NO NO ND NO ND 5.00 5.00 100.00 10.00 5.00 5.00
Tota1Cyanide NO NO NO ND NO 8.00 5.00 54c, 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
2nc 114.00 7300.00 4110.00 1250.00 3193.50 1004,00 2.50 2.50 50ko 5.00 2.50 2,50
ML=Method Limit
=Not Detected W _
NA=Not Analyzed
Estimated Concentration
Page 2
APPENDIX 9 FINAL EFFLUENT
MICHLlCON WAVE WCYCLING PLANT
SUMMPPY Of ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR FINAL EFFLUENT
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWD AND WECK LABORATORIES
ol¢tl
d
IN11/017 IY3201B M&2018 pVERN3E AVERAGE 10/11/2017 1/ 015 M3✓A1B ML MINIMUM
Ie Oaie 111. ) 1d..11 1/21.18 922010 M11Y/IS PD16MO IL bOEaLF 10/112NI ll.2I0 SNAIL
VOLATILE PRIORITY POLLUTANTS:
a.L1-T1&1r 11aoe NO IN 1N ND NO ND DO oso 0. Dsa asa On
1d22-TelaMlom nape NO Na W __NO IO NO am 010 LLm Dm
1,1?Tnamorcelnane No NO ND fO NO ND ON am a. RW OW am
1,1-Dlcnmrceinane ND NO NB Na ME ND ow O.W ow ow ON OW
I Olcnln.,Fh— No wD SO M wD ONi o.w ow ow aN D
1,9O6hlarahe—ne NO NO ND CN rvp o6'1 6O aw ow am as
,2 1 plcnlomNnane NO NO ND Na Na _ NO OO O 1 OW_ R10 aW an
1 xGicNonpro ane NO NO ND _ NO NO NA 00 INN 0. OO OAO am
I,sON11100BYmlM ND ND ND M ND ND am 050 0. Ow ON, aA
I,a Dmmomoenione uo NO ND NO __ND Mo am on oso om Ow am
Acmlem XO ND AR Na ND 60a 6Aa sm sm _ 60a I'mAcryl-nle ND 1O WJ NO NO NO 200 ON 2.m _ 2W ON 2.0
911i1I No Na ND NO ND NO am am D50 Dw ON a.IN
UIQMWcNSCMNnane 'AN 10A 'N.W 25.N Ma lO 1ii 0.N 0.0 0w ON aN 0.N
M 1• AIL NO IN NG 0m 0 A NO 0.N am O5o af0 6W am
Brom tI,,ane 6N 59 ND NS IO_ - NO am ON Ow _N ON, 0.N
Canon let,Wonoe NO NO ND NO HIS NO ON aN am am OWaN
Cnlorooereem NO IO NO NO NO Na ON O50 ON ON ON aN
Cnlorwthane NO MD IN NO BE NO am OSO ON ON IN 050
Crorolo,m 11)-00 sPoo f_N_ v7D 315 _ pW ON O.N 0.N am am a.N_
Chbromelnane NO ND NO _ OWN a
m 0, am ON am am
1.2 NOhloroem¢ne _ IN NO _ IO ND NO 0.0 ON am aN 0.50
cls- ND
ois1301cMoroprapone MD NO NO IO ND Na ON ON ON 6N
Dluvn¢Nm... _ T.N 5.10 ON 743 001 ON —am- am 0.50 0.N OW DSO
E1hNhenwne ND NI LID NO ND NO ON ON aN aN ON
NMI,necnbntle NO _ N0 NO IN ND _ ]N 2.0 ON 2N iN 2.0
Telrachlo,othene _ND _I_O NO EV NG MO MAa am O 50 650 aS0 aN
I.. ND 10 ND NO 1 _MD aN. O.sB am 0.N aN am
ns-12-GlcnlomeNene ND ND ND Np ND am 0"00 050 650 @50 0.50
¢-I,yDlcnloropmpene NO ND NO NO ND ND am O.N aso aso am am
monror0mn lane NO W IN M NO M ¢N am OAO ON aN 010
TncnmronuoromeNaG. wD ND NOND rvD N am aN DSa 65D ¢N
Page I
aPPErvolx FINAL EEEILEM
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
ORGANIC
TRME0 Y$4R NYLYSIECYOSOFK bIES
ORGAwC ANALYSES G£RFORMEO BY IRwB ANO wECK uBORATORES
ie51 re5'ul6 N ag/I e
LL
1011R01] VY201B 03@018 AVERAGE AVBNN[E IRCIL201) 1/ 010 E,=y 0 moN
Som ¢Dais vlaims 1a'IaWn Namne xwmw amamq mrmn Ni WL6A0n 1wi22017 1rza 01e Sz201e
Vinyl cM1Nnoe ND b ND IO ID a. am RG am am am
VOLATILE FOLwTANTS-Ha3ARDous SUBSTANCES'
-GCxanOne ND ND No Na No $D lam lam lam ta0a lam lam
-MCNV12 penianone ND ND Na ID NO b I= lam IOm NFm lam lam
NO NO Na am 0.b IN IN am am am 20 _Ym
croon aisulliae IN Np Na Na ID ID IN I'm 1m Im 1.0 1m
P+pXyeHM b No Na ID rvB ME 0.m a.so nm 0.0 to am
1y ND b b b 2m am am am IN am Mem em a ND
oxy6ne b ND NO b ID b am aaD O50 0.0 am 6W
Styrene b No b No No No on am. 0.50 am am aW
evanyamivan 1A NC m No ID m I➢m lam lam IaAa lam loco
vinyl aUeL, ID ND Na No No �N6 Om am Om 0.0
OLI am
EASE,NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. _
12A-TOCNmoaewew b No NG ND N6 No IN SW Sm am 5.00 am
12 BlpnenmaLa>hie _b No b Na. No No 1.00 IN Im 1m $m Im
2,a Bl.1-1ueae No No No No. MD No s00 _Sm Lm m Sm am __N
2&DInirNmuene No _ No No IO No No Sm Em am _Sin am Em
2Cnloronapht,ene No No ID rvD ND No 1. 10.00 10.00 It. lab lam
3,2'-BicnloWMMdine No ND ID b NO NB Sb am SDJ fw Lm am
4Bmm0phen 1ph.n,IIO— NO Na ID ND 1D No $0 500 $m Sm Lm _ IN
aCHI oropnen)lpnenyleIIer No IND ID ID NB No 50 L0 Sm 5.0 40 LO
Acerepninenc NB NU No No AD No 1. !0 Im 1.0 Im Ib_
e Phlh,lene No NO_ No ID ND No tom -lam NIW lain 10.Oo tam
MINKO1e No _ Na Na NO ND No 5m 50_ Sm $0 am S_m
Ifi.— ne No Na Na NO NC ND I 5Ro S. 5m am $m
ERHi alaniMacene ND ND Na ND No NO SW _ _ Sm 6.m 1. am Laa
B—n a)Wreae ND NO Na ID ND NO Ia W ON 1a00 10.00 W. la.m
aenzIXo)nuoreni F2ne No ND rvD No _ME) ND 10ao It. lad, lam 10.m IC.W
Benza(g.n,i)pe lane ND ND MD No ID ND Sm $m a.m IN am $0
eenzaptyI,oremnene No ND MD b_ _ MIT, No B. 1a.m lain law low, 10.m_
SS2-chlb RD methane No rvB 1D No SW fb 60 E0 Sm 6m
Page 2
APPENDIX g FINAL EFFLUENT
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SIMWNV OF OFOYNC%UOIi1Y{f 411FNNLYYf;FOR It!RW}iR
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED By IRWL AND WEEK LABORATORIES
W leer meulle In eg/Ie_epiee nXe0)
Yl
1 D/T/2BP V&2018 R,AwtB AVERAGE AVERAGE 1A1V20I7 I/&2D18 WJI201S MIT MINIMUM
Sample Dare 11.Lll lGl.ols 1@'M01S 622018 ]OWMO R 1111DV N 7 1AYj01F Nyy1F
Bls(2LM1brceIXII D 1.1 NO M9 ND NO NO m 1W LW im 1.0E IDO to
DsosCLIorlsoplopD)ether No No No No ND No 2W zw am 200 J..N pm
Blsol ELAIMryO pMllalale ND NO M 0 m 1O 6W _Sm 606 }m_ Sm am
Butyl Oenryl ppimlaie ND ro m NO ND ND !Om ) low Flom law 10.m Iom_
(nryaene NO ro ro No ND No low lom I m low row low
[Real Usaamrzcere No No No No Fill _W _ mm low low low low Iom
Dlnnylphthree No ro q NO 1O NO zm zm oDo zm zw zm
meryl prahatiae AID _ ro m No DO NO xw >m 3.w 200 im zw
DI-N BeINpMhalale No _ No m NO FO NO low IOW IDW Us. OUS IOW
1RB.OAylpnmalale NO lO fO NO FO NY a. low 1000 low, mw I0.00
FNv�nxne NO Nor M NO FO IO I.— _ _ I.w I W_ _ _1. 1. low
F-Cre 1D ND m No ND ND low _ low low low 10w low
EX—ts roeema. No M NO No ME ND 1. too im 1. 1. IN
HexacNorob.Uelene NO No ro No HE, HE IW 1m lm lm Im Im
HeYacNorocAeopenorLens ND ND NO No m m 5DE Sw Sw 5W Sw }m
xachIorwlM1ane ND mm NO No Fp IBE IW IN, Iw 1w a.m
Ild.lall,Ai Ns),A ne No m NO m m100E low low to. 10w to S'
kopAolone m NO NO NO AIRND 1 w I W imI w 1 w 'ANa IM re ala ND our NO NO N0 Not W I m INo 1 W W low
NboCNNNN ND No NO No Halt AID I.m — Iw tm I Im IA
• IO MO NO No For mam 5W Em Sw_ 5w 6m
N NIRYOMl neprrop al ND BE
NO ND ND 5W _500 }w No5w _ Sm
NNio-wLsIphanyla TIM ro ro m ro ro No 1. I.m im ow LW 1.0
Flapapplihompar Fall _NO NO NO NO ND 5m m 6m low 6.so 6m
PRene IO MO ND m ND NO 10.W tom low _ IOw low Flom
ACID EXTRACTABLE PRIOHITY POLLUTANTS:
p,6-mcnlom M1erol ND 10 NO ND ND NO IOw lOm law He 10w IOOO
IIDlmlal eenol NO NO NO ND m NO 5w _ 6A] saw sw sW _ loam
4olme1ny4neml No M m ND m No zw zw z00 ]w xW 2m
Ilmplleml NO ro No ND m NO sw 6w 6.W 6W sw sm
2 Cnbropneeol ND NO NO ND ro NO 5w }w 6W sW sw
NropM1erol NO 10 HO ND m No 10w IOm IOW 10W low low
6Dm it r000weel No m NO DID ND bm SW Sw SLO 6m
Pape 3
APPENDIX g FINAL EFFLUENT
MICHELSON WATER BECVCUNG PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR FINAL EFFLUENT
W6YpG AN.LLVSES PERFCgMED BY IRWO AND WRECK I ABJRATIXtES
iesi re..w1.m dea
ML
101017 VY20lB 4Ym11 AVERAGE AVERAGE_ _ 1dfi1ID17 VAICLA Ay IB MEMINIAI
ampN Date En
0P i
S�DdHa p_ ILISU 2016 Wl7 BID 11H..V alIGNV ll.eHe _11.10
N.,.R' I _ "0 No NO IOCV I iam low law law
4nlora mgresd IO NO _ID 1A) 1A Lw 100 TL0 1m
nlacDCLOPhead M) NO Im 4w aw {m S.W &Be !m
Mnal ID NO M1 In 1.. I.W t00 to 100
NA EXTRACTABLE POLWTAN'S-HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE
4ETnehomphenel ID Na NO NA ID ID am am am' &I NA am
IM1hVln.p..LUc Nfl No NO NA NB M1L to IME to 1. NA am
Metnylpneml Re No ND IRA NO BeID Sm Sw S aw NA Sw
twrevrlim D9 NO NO NA ID Be, law _ _IO.w law _ Iam va law
3 NNnroammne _ Na NO NO IRA ID BID N.m a.w _ 20001mm NA WHO
CnI o0ranlllne NO NO NO. IRA ID NO am am sw 100 rvA aw
SSa Meinyl nend MS NO NO NA, ID NO Lm Lm 1 N J l,m NA tm
4.wrcan11lre Be, NO NO NA No No Nw mw Mw no NA No,
Anlme !D NO ND NA No NO r sm am sw SW NA am
Demo,ada rvo No v0 NA NO NO sO00 saw sow saw NA mm
Ben lalnenn rvD NO NO NA NO No So - _ to s W to NA em
aroamNm ro NO w NA uD No s6a am I am am NA III
PRIORITY POLLUTANT PESYICIORS,
4'-DOO ND NO ME ND NO NO _006 M1m am am 0.m am
41 COF Na Na NN HE M NO Ow _ am H. to am am
AD DDT ND NO NO ND NO ND all a.Ol 0.01 0.m Om am
mM NO Be, NO NO NO NU 0o1 am am aM am nm
Alpha-ETC HO ID Be vO No ND oal 0.01 C.CI am Om 0.01
10H9F ND No NO NO 10 NO 0.01 oat e.m am am Om
I[gIN No NO ID IO No No a'a 010 a." al0 am aw
DeOa SHC Na ND M NO IO ID M0_I 001 am "1 am ail
OINT NO NO ID NO IO NO DO1 _ a01 am am apl am
Enoosulfan sulfate NO NO 10 ND IA No 0.m 0.05 0.05 aaf OO5 0.05
EnhosWfanl ND NO ND NO IA No _Om a.m O.m am am 0.02
aswfan-II ND NO Iq 10 ID NO 0.01 OA1 O.m am am am
Enann NO NO IO ND rID NO am 001 o.A1 C.m MCI 0.m
Page 4
APPENDIX a FINAL EFFLUENT
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT _
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORIN POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR FINAL EF LLI NT
Caaulm.WNraka"w cIIMfa aY Ylwa MIDwcc A UBOIlATO1q[9
aalesl All",Ln u I eSa 1 e wNa
_ wE _
ID/1112017 1.Ll. MEOOla AVERAGE AVEfiAGE 1N1112017 V&2D18 .,Il0 OF MINIMUM
Sample IOTA ILOOH7 1WI2CWI7 _1292018 6WDN IIaIT'Ala 2016ROV ¢ ]/l..17 lwl/017 1CI2019 1laea
Encnn alaenyoe ro NO _ xa Ip NO - wa Gal oat 00l am aM aw
Rapiecnlnr wo _ND xo Ip M _xo Dal 0.al aM 0.01 aa1 a0l
He to IICr epnelae 1A No ro Na 1O a0l aal OOi om Dal
L;naane No ND NO wD No _ ro am aat am am am M
Mema.yrnlar ro ND ND M NO ro Am ING am I S. _NA 0
aCIPme, Na Na _ _NO 10 1tl IN am am ON 0_W am am
LOU-1221 Ir4 ND NO ND ND wa am am am_ eN am am
PfAVO. Na No xo Na NO _M _ ON _ am ON am ON om
rarlw ND No xo io NO w am as, Dm ow Uso am
PCU-124a F M1 N wo ND ro NO am am om om am o
P .m
Wlaal _ NO ND w ro No, am om ow am om
PCe-l2aD No NO Ma ro No ro am oW Dm 'a
m am am NOxo NO
IO l0 Z om om am am am
Page 5
APPENDIX A IN FLUE
MCREG.CN.a PELYCLM_i
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUFaN1 ANALYSES FOR INFLUENT
tltlNC 1MUI PERFOR.I.WY MIWD AND WWK LAIOMTOMFS
n eg/l a¢ ,.—YA"
10/4/2FII 1/32013 4/3/2018 AVERAGE AVERAGE 1.1O V I/3/2018 4=018 MLN.—.
Staple Dale L@/2%7 1OFI 1'232018 52/2CNA WNTRWID wIHOV IL F/IZ2017 III IY201] V23/2018 "Iel8
VOLATILE PRIORIN POLLUTANTS:
1 iTncmor0atnare I NI UP uD NO NO NO nw am ON 4w 0.m 0.w
1.1 22-TeNachloroeMane No-- "D _ _Xp NO NO NO ON Om am V.m_ ow— nw
1 2-TAcnloroet,. ND _M Np UP NO ND am am ON, Om O.m ON
-picnlor0emana NO NO NO M NO NO Ow Om OAO am ON nm
1.1 Dlcmor0einene __ Im NT ND M HO NO ON Om OSD 0.m_ Om Ow
12•Dlchiorabennne NO NO ND ND Np NO ON _ Ow Ow Om_ 0. ON
1.2-Dknloroemane IO M _ NO NOO!0 an ON Om O.m_ Ow q.�DNpINFI-. ane Me M NO WC NY 6w nw n_w 0._w Ow O_m
ND M IO IO IOOw 0.w 6w pwND IO M ND fO O10 O!0 OSO Om Om Om
Milan NO ro M LO NO nw sw a. s W sw AN
AcryinnnriE ND rw No MD ro xm _ am am :m zm xw
BaavN NO tO IN NO NO OA 6)0 WN AN Om ON Om _
orvmoPMNLwMNan NO NO NO rvo IN ow ON ON ON ON WO
eromolorm IO IO 1Oup NO _ _ uD Ow am Om ON O.w _Om
R ND NO No ND I NO Aso ON ON, oso M. ON
ONbOYaY10iM1 ND _M) ND NO NU ND ova ON Ow Om Os0 _ ON
wNNNY11aN IO xO __NO 10 I NO am YAP am on Of0 on
LMorOeiFana NO M IO M1 ND ND Dw ON O50 am 6w __Ow
crnormorm am IN ne in I,. -:1 ON 0. O!0 0. ON ON
NONO ND NO ND No r_am _ _ am nw Dm aoo ON
Ia-02-Dlcnlomemene `0 NO ND _ 10 , . Ow ON ON ON ON ON
—1 F-PlINIMPIMPOIll NG NO M _ to am nw. ON ON ON
olnromocmoromelMre NO ND M ND ND rvD USA WO OSO Ow_ 0w Om
Emyloollene NO NO M NO - .- L 50 Ow am am C!a nw
Uth,I III-ide ND ND NO NO +- NO - Tm _ Tm nw MW Tw to
TNNi1MMI M NO IO NO ND ND Om Ow_ Ow am ON on
T01 IIN NO NI ll ) Oa3 P.N Om ONI Om Ow am ON
trans-12 DicMomemene ND NO 10 Om Om ON 0!D Of0 Ob0
sI,3-Dmmompmcene M NO IO �u.
i- MD O.m Om O.w D!0 Om on
ricMoraeNylene ND ND NDNc _Lp Om _ _ Om_ O!0 oS0 0m am
Tarnmrolmoromelnane _ NO ND_. NIIO NO Om 0m O.la ON cm, ow
vm lonrorlae M rvD Na M MD ON I am Ow aw oso ow
Page I
APPENDIX P INFLUENT
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR INFLUENT
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRWDAND W ECK LABORAWRIES
WISPsulislnu /1 A01
K
IMa/Pm] V12w6 .18 qAYSAWG AVY11.� 1WW20 QWW' a./J/t018
SN1 6agple Dale AY7fa 1 Y(1rV 1lxl�_ 5R2016 9p $pl! 2916Q➢I ML )IIG40L) 1W11/201 I�FaI] ! IOQOY
VOLATILE POLLUTARTS-NAUFDOUS SUBSTANCES.
44mg. ID ro m NO AD 10 SYm law 1YW LOW No 1o.
Metli nNnone m LA NO NO W 9.59 SOm lam im 1&m_ $BW tom
zmle. all.m silm lmm mmm lm.x MOf !m no mW sW
Callonalswnae fa IO W m Im @.n lm sm I lm I lm 1 W
+-x lanes M im ND NO Ma I'm Om O50 W5U 030 GW _000
Methyl et Iketone 3B6 ro ],Ol sp ]M I'll, tm 1m tm 2m Pm pm
-%'lane W WE, No ND 0.51 as0 _Om OW_ am _Om_ Om
ryrene ND ro ro NO NO ro Ob am ms Om am an
ebehyemf1— IC ro ro ND ND NO lam Spm tam lam Lcm LOW
VI IaceD,e ND ND ro ro ro MD am 0.W a.W OW OW am
BASPMEUTRAL E X FACTABLE PRIORI P01 UTAWB:
1,2ATIhnlewOpnze ND ND ND ND Ma M 25.m xap y4m mm 6.W xW
Ix Oah eylnyorann NO N0 1O ro NO _ NO _ 9m _ 6W SW Sm so so
za Dinuroimoenp HD rm_ w ONND SO xm _xW asm no am am
2,5oGnlo-otoluene NG ND ro NO NO xm no asm xm tL.m xm 0
z cmnrnnapnmalena ND NO NO ro NO Na mm SON mW mW saW moo
B,B�D¢nmeoen:Lamp NO ND � ra ro NO _ NO xW _ asm asm am nae am
a9rmm� nenw vnenyl NO NO ND ro NO NO xm _ xm _ a!m xW xW _ zsm
a Cmoroetleml Phenyl ether ND No M NO _ NO NO _ 3sm zsm zIL P. 1
enevnlnene Na xo NO Na ORM sm _ im _ 1. .—_Sm l.M sm
Arena nlnNere NO NO rvD W NO ND No _ 5_O CO .__SEW _ sam mm W.
slllggo NO Na ro ND ND _ NO xW 3!W 29W xm xW 25.m
YNAI! NO ND NO ND Na NO am 25m 25m xW _ xm _ 29W
6e olalaulnracen NP MG ro NO OR ND xW 29m xsm am 30.00 xsW Benxola yrpne 11O W ND NO NO NO SOW _ SOW SVW m_m l 0000 SOW
Be Ib111 Mne NO m ND Na NO NO _ faOa SBm 50m No ~—W= SBm
Be Ig, ) ry e HD NO NO NO M NO xSm 25m 35W 39m
BB (k)p Nn ne NO ED _ NO NO NO ND 5a00 mm 1 SOm SOm 5aW mW_
B ( -h1 N }mehue W ND NO I NO ro Na xm 25m 25m 35W xm SSW
B(2An Mlpmes ND M NO I NO ND ND !m em _ Sm 1m !W !m
Bs -0h mosO m [lather m ND NO OR NO Wlam OW IOW IOm 1000 IaM
Pape 2
APPENDIXg INFW EM _
M01E15OX WATER PELKLMRNIT
_.
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
nas'PRIORITY P6,. ANALYSES FOR
tEmo NT
Cq\NCANKYBEB PNFpIfFO6V RN04X0 WmaLWMmNl9
(al n194ex reel
_ a
_ Id0/20II 11L2019 N9/2R18 AVERAGE AVERAGE IDam1T 1111118 4fJ12018 MLL1,—
Sam laDa@ Tt.1F1] 10/11I t 1/2 .A yL2oIB a1TRpl6 x016xOly aAim" 1NIl/01] V2$12015 5121201g
BA2�EMNhevyll pntnalete 1p _ M NO W ND W 26m lam am am _xsm_
."I banryl phthalate ND DID1b MAX)rvD M m 5oW 50.W 5D.0o Wm Saw
M1rFI-I NO NO M ID ND I ND am am a.a aw taw Sow
D_i benzd_a"Anlnracene _ W _ Ml ND M ED ND WX mm um SOm A.N 50.m_
ethyl phthalate ID ID ND lD NO M IOm lam IO-w IOw 10w \0_m
G—thyl phthalate . ID M M NO M low Tam 16.m 10.m IOm law
Di-N�BtVphthalate M M M M NO M mm no no am am ON
LNOWhlha6le NO M M M M M am am am amam ON
Fluoranmene_ NO
M M M NO M aw 6m Mam sm am
Fwnrene M M M M M M aw Ma —moo am am 60m
nexarnrorooen:ane M ISI rvD ND NO M 6w IN 6F0 so am am
Reeachlorohuuelena M M NO ND uD M _SM sm sw 6m sm sm
nexarnmrocycbpemaalene W NO NO ro M rO am aw am a m am aw
Ne.echtoroetnane NO _ 1m _ _ND ND M M 6m Sm sm >m aw am
Noeno(18Pcmwrena No ro _ M M M M 6oD4 _ _ lam am am am am
Iwpho—e _ M ND_ NO No NO M sm am am am 6m 6.m
Naphthalene M no EN ND ED NG 6m am $.a M _Am
NN_mgXwq ND M M M u0 M am 0.m 6m 6m Sao am
N Nitrosohimeth Rmine M M M M NO _ M NEW am am am am 25m
N_Nltr—lI ptopylaMna ro M. M _ M W M am no am am a.m E60
RNnrosohlphmyl— Na M M ND M M Am 6w am {m_ aw )00
Phenanl.lA ND ND M _NO ND ND am Math 'am NEW am, am
Pyrene Na M M ro IO6D am am am KW am
ACID P#RACYABLF PRIDRIIY POLLUTAb -.
psThcnlompnenol ND M M W NO ND SOW _ am am am MIN am
a-Dichloropnenol ND M M M XD M NEW I am am I'm am atll
p-Dlmet¢bhenpl ND D M M ND M low lam Ram Raw low low
p.DAiwpM1enoR ND ND M M 10 am aw _ _aw aw am ,MLD_
zcnarovneaol M M M ND W M am _ vsm xm xa.w nth am
z-NnrophenoR ND ND M W M M ON aw a.m am am am
6 Dialro-oc .1 ND ND M ND ND W aw _. _ 25.w am xI as a.m am
a Nnropholol NO MD— M ro I M 19 am aM b0_m am am ON
chlora-mcreao1 ro M W M a® IN fm _ _ 6m am aw Sm
Pehtarnbro M1eom ND NO N —ND M M . Mam Moo am
Page 3
APPENDIX a NFLUBNT
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING FLAW
$UMMAMY OF ORGANIC PRIORY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR INFLUENT
HGANIO ANALYSE$PERFORMED BY III AND WECK LABORATORIES
NCI tests JSIn Cl a,cest as sales
a
lwareon 111111e '"01P ♦NRm[ AVERAGE 1af D.1S al=lS ML-Mln .
$am eC., mi t MHOWNT TIYAb M g =,Me W OWD' NL 11CADt7 D l9
T f WiWl6
PAB'd a - 6A0 NO) 1]M am ?CO OW am 6m 6m SW
DNA E%TRACTABLE POLLUTANTS-RAsAAR000S SUBSTANCES
2p5-TncnlorlPhMol NO NO NA NO NO Wm 96.m N1,00 MW_ Wm
2-Mefll-UMTalene I0 BIG DID NA ND ND soWm Wm am NA
2-MeN lICIPI NT MD _ NO NA NO NO am Wm ]6m ]f Y0 NA Wm
NN3nFP 10. ro NO NA NO No WW Wm 11000 Wm NA Wm
bNMw ND NO NO NA ND rvD imm tWID IW.ol B". NA 1mm_
♦ONmu4nP NO AID SO NA NO NO am am ]PW 26 NA Wm
360-Memyphsral 2690 3DID VA NA W.m Bim 6.W 600 Sm SW NA }00
NAme T niure 20 _NO NO NA NO NO imm1DD.W Im.W tCOW NA imm
ArimP NIA I NO ND NA NO NO W.W ]1.m 26W i$W NA W.m
Ynm2ssi0 NO w NI NA ND Na NOW MW 350W NA NOW
Es".1lcoaol ND NO 10 Na 10 T'a am Wm 26W ESW NA am
m, NO W NA NC NO am am am 25W NA am
PRIORITY POLLDTANT PE57DIDES:
4p'-DDD ND M ND IW IA M1D tlffi 0ffi 0a 0]6 0]0 016
4a UDE _NO NO NO NO AD Np Offi. Oa Oa Oa Ym Oa
44'-DDT rvD ND ND NO BE 10 0.m am ON ON AIR ON
n rvD Np 10 I0 NO MO Om ON OW Om ON OW
A?pKC C NO NO_ ND W IW NO aW Om OW Om O10 ON
RASIBNC NO ND NO NO NO 1W am ON Om Om_ _Om 0.0
ChIsYkne _ ND NO ND IW IW MD O.b O.W 0.W Om 60 am
L 40I NO NO NO NO W 010 Om Om am ON am
ONOnn NO ND NO m NO 10 am 0.0 a05_ 01% OW ON
ErgNMln Euxa __ ro NO ND ND ro IC Oa On affi am am Oa
Eneo..Is,I _ IW ND I NO ND NO 410 ON, O,p 0.10 Om a.10
Enooswlan-u NO NO ND xD NO ND am ON am I am OW om
ErMln W x0 NO NO uD am an 0m am n _a.m
Enern alashMe xD ND NO ND ND ND an aW 0CP 005 0.10 o.Us
H ,U`Nbr NO NO NO NO NO m Om am ON am O.IO Qm
Heptacnbr epovlee NO NO NO EO Na M ON 0.m _am O.m 0,10 o.m
DeOane ND 10 ND xD rvD NO file W0 010 BIG m0 QIO
Page 4
. .. .nPPEN_ol%p INFwENr.
twaEl.son w��Yn w41111ND w,M
$WYM OF Olq W C PPpPIIY PoLLIIT�M•NX.YEES Pofl INF W EMT
OMNNC.WMMFE PEPiMOIEOMIXWOPND WECX{ABUIIhiMIEb
W
1 N420R V3/2DI6 4/3/'LOIB _ AVEPAOE AVERAGE INN201] 1MO1B 4/9/2018 WL-Minimum
Bem le Deie AM1ti201] 1N11/PR1] � 1@3/2A18 9}/2018 p000p1! A103011 R ]/1220f] lM1/t01] liY,f/[018 92/2618
M,th,hka Np XD !A N/. _NO_tU _e2 on E.b 0]E IN 02b
PL6ID16 ND ND ND ND _ ND NO 2w 2m 2.50 )SY Y61V 2w
PE612S1 ND ND _ND XC b ND 250 250_ to 2m iW 9_J0
MPIM ND ND _IO M19 IvD PD ]W 2!J_ Y.CO 3!0 b.W 250
f_C_&_IW ND ND ND M w m 2. 250_ !._Y_ Y_!Y _b_l_Y
P:B12Y_ ND No 10 ND IU M _ t!i _ t!0 2.0 in bLO 2E0
_PL9-I_256_ ND _ _ND ND NO W M ?'A _ 252 2" Y50 b.W 2A0
Pplltl ND NO IO nD 10 10 250 150 3E0 2. E.W m
ND ND ND ND 10 m 2.. 2.. ]. 2M b.Ol 2.
Page 6
APPENDIX SLUDGE LINE
MfCRELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR SLUDGE LINE
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRW D AND WECK LABORATORIES
(antes sultsh l— ptasnotM]
MINIMUM ML
ING2aV IIY2DIa 422010 AVERAGE AVERAGE IWM20P 1N32U1B 4 2010 MIML
Ie Date 11111,11 1vn12Dv Ip41b 522FUS -amI zoluzov YL Vulgar, ghxpll Vi le "MMS
OWTI LE PRIORITY POLLUTANTS'.
11,I Tnh oroethane ND NO ND ND PO NO 0511 050 OSO _ 0ED Oft am
12a'Fetrxnroroether _ND i NO, NO, NO NO, ND am asa am 0EG BN a50
112-Tnchlo—thane AD NO NO NO ro NO P., 0.b OSa u5a am a5a
11-Dmnlomemane ND ND ND ro In ND M am a5a o50 Ua aW
11-Dirnlaroemene NO NO NO NO NO
rvD 050 Oso am ONO as aka
1 NO NO— ro ND NO, NO A n10 oN oNO nY! ova
12-De11oroetnane NO _ uD ND q ro NO Na am a.W 0.b 02a amp
l roic,MMropane Na NO NO NO NO, NO ON ON ON ON on amp
1,3 olcnlarWemere NO M NO ro LA ND am a50 ab _ _0_b 0.b OSD
1 SDicMarozOnam No _ND ND NO q NO Qb O50 0NO aSO _ 4n amp
rv_O TO IN q q NO aW SW 5. sW SW Sm
crymnitdle NO NO NO NO Na Na IW 3W RW 2N 90) 2W
NO 1IDRIY q q NO 0n O5a am 050 0b amp
metna_m Tm q ro q 1.75 an 0b 0TO ON Or, Om0 On
NO q ND NO No ND aso p50 050 aso OSD WO
Np _ 10 NO _ND NO ND am 050 _050 .N am ON
allon to nlorae NO q rvD ND NO ND 0.b o50 a50 Ob
TPonenzPe NO N ll O NO ND NO NO a 0w 0w 0. 0m a5a
Iwe NO NO NO ND NO IN ab 0.m_ ab p5p 0.5a an
nrorolorm M.n a0f I.]a am- 706 flan 0.n Or, ON aft am ON
nmromelnane uo NO No ND NO °A_NO os0 O 0W amOftamIs-t2-Dich—elnene q q ND NO ID q 00 Om am 0pA _ aft O.b
s-1,3 Dichlomplo NO ND NO NO _ NO an owam0 6b am od0
iomllnalmromemane __1.70 ND ND NO a" am! am _ 0.50 Ol0 0.b am OAO
OF 2enzene Xa NO NO No NO NO 0.n am0 am0 am0 aW am,
Meth lI 01Dtvle q q NO NO ND NG 200 2.00 am 2b 2.. 2R)
vacnlol th— q q NO ME ND M aW 0.m0 am
Ob aft _ON
am_m_e ro aR 10.00 aim aR_ 0.0a 6Y pm0 ON aaY 0.m0
ne-1,z-Dlchbroet.. NO ND ND M19 NO NO "A 0.m0 050 0.. am0 am
ans-13-Oicnloropr%ene NO ro ro ro No ND 6b a.M Om0 0.b amD (
Tncfibmetn lane q ND q NO NO q aA 6m0 ab On am O.b
Trcfikrolluoromethane ND ro q AN ND A4 4a0 650 Om0 Om0 a60 O.b
Page 1
APPENDIX g SLUDGE LINE _
NICHEISON WATER RECYCLMG PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR SLUDGE LINE
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED
E o AND WWM LABORATORIES
u eleei GAuT I ez e 1 m lo,A
MINIMUM ME 1
IOIYAR 901KIM mmNs .AF AAWMINE WWI 1/Dw18 ACD016 xln x_
Sample DMA 1111OUT 10/IV201] I2YoMlB SD Fl0 20172018 lolo?OP W 11CM019 10M112011 1G42010 52201E
VA,ICNIOPJA IC DD ND NIP No nfl Om Ow OW. OW _ 0No 0.W
nth NOLLVMIRB•NAi/NODl66UBSTANOF6 .
2Aezenane NO No wD IO !O NO IDW lotp 10.00 IO.00 'Om Wm
4MeN L2 Manone No No ND ND NO NO Ww IDW 10.W IPW IOW flaw_
Ol.m No law an aO NOUN OW 2130 OAO i.W 2W im
OI 0lso11l1e w WSOO 474.W HID LMw Now 1.0 1.0) IAO 1.W I 1.W
mm xlen.a Nn ND NO ND ND on Om Oso am OW 0m O5o
WtI,`AT,I Remo. NO No O,M NO 'All am 2. Om 2m P_W 200 . o.
,Xyl.ne NO NO ND No NO M10 am Om Om ON am
."—A IO ND BIG ND No ND Om ON Om O.NI os_
Telranrarnluran No No Llo NO NO MS mm law flow lam IOW 10.00
vLyl acAale Im No ND NA NO uo Aas m OW IN ON a0
BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE PRIORITY POLLUTANTS:
y2,4-TrlMiRwenzere NO NO No NO No AN ism SSA IOa00 mm SW., Q6W
1,2.DIM1en norazlne 10 NA ND LID NO am 5W WW_ _ 1.Ow 1OOW 5_W___
u0
__.
24 Dlnilrold,ene NO NO MD 110 NO NO 26W am lmm "' mm smm t5W
2,6 Oin ivomluene IO NO NO IO NO No i6.m S.m IW.WTSow Room MOO
2 CM1IM1mn M1llulene Na ND ND ND No NO SOW m.w WOm loo. IWOM mm
3,S'-0IcnlorobeNioine Im Xa NO NO No No now S.W. 1.W SO.m 5ww AW
.
4-Brow nen n elver IO NO IO NO NO NO 21w EW N. SOm sNow, nW
SCMom Oenl den lellle[ NO NC ND ND 1d NO26m 2s.W Imm m m Swm tdm
fO OF W NO NO NO AW 6m Ww low ISR AP 5m
e-UUh,Iere NO No No Hp No Woo mp0 wR. woo I[wW mW
Anibacene NO NO NO ND No ON, O5m 2500 +_BOW _ no 1ww Wm
Benndne NO Na NO ND No rvD 91m law 1WO) 5Dw 50ow_ 2SOO
Bentga)anmracene M 'No NO ND No NO WOO .W _ +W W Ww SW W_ SW
BentIXalP ran. NO NO ND NO NO Na OIIW Il mW y M. IN. I.m SOW
BanzWb lluorMiM1eM Na Na Na 00 !ID 50.00 SOOO mow IWm 1w0.00 SO.w
wnzq' , llp.,leA ND ND M ND No No am 2E.00_ Iwm SOW Wow XW
PAPANk111OAnillene ND ND NO NO ND ND mm m.w wN. lmw No NO on
Bi52-chlaUN,0 mel0e1e NOI NO MD ND NO I ND P8A5 ism 1mW N. mom ESm
Page 2
APPENDIX 9 SLUDGE LINE
W CHEISONwHTER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR SLUDGE LINE
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRW D AND W ECN LABORATOPI ES
(all test re sate in sell exceles hNeU
MINIMUM ML
1NG201) tAYJ/118 AaAaRIF AVERAGE AVERAGE UV'20V 1/L2M8 lV2016 WIN.
Salnpk Dale _ A1120P 1N1 12017 V20Y201B aN a PDi?9 a Walmi a 912901] I0I MG, 1M90U iAC01B
3s ChissaGR she r _ NO ND NO NO ND NO {YD &in Am 10.00 Imm _ _6m
2Clarene.1cp ll ether NO NO NO ro NO NO law lam_ wa Wm -M 1Ym
DIP Phmelate No 261N =a ro ",a am 36w Iw:YO �SP_W smm ain
NISEnry linneale ND NO NO [9 ro No mm wm ]mm Imm Im6m No
nryaane 4O n`D NO ro M No am I a. wallIm.m lmom %in
Dbanzn(a,h)emnzcene NO fD_ NO 10 ro No s0.lA sOm MW Imm 1W0.00 w.m
Diethyl phtnaate NO NO NO No NONO low law mm no 206.w low
DimHhyl preheat NO NO ND N] NO NO low _ lam_ ON Wm 9w.m is.
DFN BUINphthalate NO I NO NO NO NO 11law wm Atlm_ Imm 1mPm Ww
DFN,Ogylphlhalate m NO 10 NO 'i ND 60w IN
_ —m lwha
loW.00 1 mw
0-anther _ NO IO 1O IO NE 3m sw W. ta_m No am
D
FluOrene a Ip_ NO ro ro NO, NO wm SPm XOw ICQm Iwpw ww
Nurf NN`n ro NO ND 10 ND NO 6.m 6m wm 160 taw i _
Nexachlorrentaaiene NP NO ro 10 NO NO aw Am w.w low 1w.w sw
Rexamlorx nIpentahlena 10 NO NO ro ND NO xN.w am lwoo ww wow 26m _
RexechlOmemene NO 10 NO tO Na NO 6w_ IN Am Law Imm 6.
oeng1,'{Spa) re 10 ND NO NO, No ro _ wm sam }mm Imm "N" Now
Plants— ND 10 al N uR Sm Nw _ Aw mw Iww sm
NxphNaahe 10 ro ro No No No I'm 6m 300p ID. Iww Sw
N".aY.. 10 ro ND ND ND No SYN sm am low 100.00 I
NNurasodmentnlamina No ND ND ND No No as b.m 1w.w WIN swoo 25% _
N Nnrosooxrrr ro 10 10 NO NO NO am am Imm am w?m 35m
N-Nnrosotli hen lamutee ND NO 10 ND NO US 6Ol _ 6m am lam nwoo 5m
Phenanthane NO IO In NO tm Mm_ 2w lww ww woW 25w _
P retie ND ND NO NO IND ww IS 00 ffiw loam hew. 60m
CID EMRACTABDO PRIORITY POLLUtAWTG
ybnlMlora heml NO No NO, NO 10L
_ SOm _ ww 11pm 1W W Into De.
2 a Dlcnlorohenell NO 10 ro NO NO .aw nm Lam am 6wm am
a Oim ayl venal ro ro NO NO NO _tow lam qw WW M.. tam
4Clnnrohi ro 10 NO NO M 15 DI1 on 100w New awm am _
Ceo nanN ro 10 IO NO NO 25 op_ am Iww wW WON 25m
Mimi W 10 M NO ro Sam am 1mm Wam Iw6m__ wm
s�Dinllroo..L NO 10 NO NO NO }S C6 U.. No w6.m am
Page 3
APPENDIX a SLUDGE LINE
MICHEISON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIOATY POLLUTANT ANALYSES FOR SLUDGE Orve
ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED BY IRW D AND WECK LABORATORIES
(all test results—WI see Pt as nDMtl
glineell AL
INM2017 113DO13 LZWlil AVEPAQE AVEAaGE lGAUDE] RELEE S E0201B MIM ML
Sa MDate MEYEV toil IJ2017 ✓M @ Fvo01e Amy a m1> ML 111/ I)1I lUll;2N7 _ O2AsDWF small
4-Nhropnenol NA NO PID NO NO 1 NO 50,00 min =00 Imm mi Ea.
ptmoromcrezol ND ND Np ND ND ve soD am 10.m min wOm s.ao
otadLLronenel Na No w xD AD z5 C0 96Ya lmm min mOm zs.0a
Raftol ND 11OLOO 34.]D 1a0.. ss Us lass IGo 6aa '8m fain Np10 a00
rvA EXTRACTABLE POLLUTANTS-HAGARDOUS SUESTANCES
2,aguimdropnenol ro. Na ro NA xo ND Ybm Asa6 Im.m w.m ...rvA
e-MartrvmnnlMlene w NO NO w w Obm _am Imm ww _ NA 4On
2 Methyphend An NO NO NA NO w Halo on OD _Imm min NA25.Gp
A•1NiOMIM ro NO NO NA NO w 60.a0 min 2mm Lmm CA min
yrvw rot w rvD uD NA xD IS 1010,00 Imm _ 440tes 100m NA _IOOm
4 AllseanNne LSI NO NO A NO w 1Em 25m lono0 No. NA ZSYa_
38a.Matnvl nano) NO Mmm NO NA SO Do. sin sin _ ]Din low CA sin
arvar,nilire NO ND NO NA NO ND tmm Imm 4m.m dMm NA tmm
Aniline NO _NO ND NA ND NO Osm MOI Imm mm, NA 2sa0
limalfi NO NO No NA NO w Alain mam lww Imm NA 211m
Bent,alcond NO ND NO, NA ND III }min am Imm mO0 NA am
Dloanzaturan ro NO NO, NO AD Mm }cm Imm min NA AUp
Poll POLLUTANT PEeticmEe:
a,4'-Di NO NO NN, ND NO ro Om Om lw 090 am am
_..
sine'-DDE ND NO w Na 1Y1 Na 0,10 aft lm ^0_m sO aPm
AT DDT NO NOw ND ND ND I am am Yon 010 Im am
Altlnn ND NO w NB w ND Om am OA_ 001 Om 006
AI na UIC NO MR NO No _ . xD am Ilm a]O 010. ata -aa6
Seta-DHC NO NO NO ND PA ND Om am a" Oat m6 0m
_ -
nmmene NO NO NO ND Na— ND am am A.m I.m >.m alto
e11a6HC NO ND ND Np Iw No am am Om am INC; am
lemon No ND NO NO NO NO am —am o20 a.1a 0m Om
End ozullmlean.. NO w ND _ND MJ NO 012, Gm I.OD O.5o os0 Us
Enaoemiaml xo M ND NO NO No 0 w "0 oa0 azO 0m olo
naaedian it ND w w ro w ND A.o5 Om 0.m 0.t0 aw oa_
nano w ro rvD ND w ND p.as 0.m am ¢OYlin am
Page 4
APPENDIX a SLUDGE LINE
MICHELSON WATER RECYCLING PLANT
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLWTANTANALVBES FOR SIDDGE LINE
ORGANIC A NALVSES PERFORMED BYI WO AND WEAK LABORATORIES
_ iasi_resu_p_s In ug/I AW pl as nde01
bbNW NIL
,F'S2017 UY201B ES2018 NVEBA6_E AVERAGE 1WA2011 1/3`2010 MZ201B MINML
Semple Data 2/ B, IYHIMOT IOYLO WMb .11.2018 MISAI2 _IAL P1Z2017 1M1@0P IsNI10I0 5/L2018
EnErin al01,W NO NO IO SD NO NO ON 045 OAF M 0.10 1%
.RROIor ND ND ND ND ND ND 005 a 0A 010 a OW
HepCRLPr eposEe NO M NO 10_ IC ND Op OM i OID 010 O,b 003
Dnpane ND ND ND _ ND 10 ND OIO 010 _ Oa0 BID 020 _Olp
MeiSoryclrlor NO NO ND IN AO ND 0J 025 1W 050 m 025
NG,,RRN NO IO M 10 1O_ NO m 2O _ 10. Sb 5,00 2!0
KIFI.1 XO NO IO IO_ NO 110 250 HOW ADo 6A0 LO
PCB-1232 NO IA ND ND O 210 2W 1DDB SW OW m
,CN-Im ND ND ND NO NO NO G0 2Ho was 5W ON YSO
PCB'1248 NO UP NO NO, M NO 2_d_0_ 2W IOW SW O00 $SO
. . _ _..
PG6-125a NO Ip SD NO NO NO 250 _ 3W IOW _ SW 600 2.0
PCB-1160 ND _NO NO NO, RD NO 2.50 _ 20 ID.0] SW dW 2:0
x0 IO 10 NO NO NO OW 250 1o.W I 0.O &w f 2!0
Page 5
appendix h
SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY
(SAWPA) REPORTS, DATA, SNC NOTICE
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority(SAWPA)July 1,2017-June 30,2018
List of SIUs with Monitoring Compliance Status FF
MamBerl Direct TTO WaIwr No.of Agenry SMR pollutants)In SNC
Fadlky Name Camara. Indirect Permit No. physical Address NAICS Code Classification Regulation Oetl Inspections Samples Samples DiscM1arge Soup.
Agency Discharger vlolallon
AnIS B.SmM Tenured FaJiry WMWD Direct D10713.1 2100 FIeenvob Drive R21310 91U 403.Sid) - d 6 0
IiNenNe,CA M.
C.C.Ga.Cmgarry IEUA IMixl 11W53.1 315 E,'un is 1]Bd17 311421 CIU 401.80 - R 12 8
OMedo CA 9
CalNmia Institutor kr M1kn IEUA Direct D100l 11901.1.Avenue =10 81U 4036(tl) - d W 31 PH small
Chino,CA.1]1.
CBim l Daealler SAWPA Direct D108131 99 CM1lno,05"CA"Add mc]N =1310 SIU 403sep - d 12 6
91
CBim ll Deasear SAWPA Dist D10103.1 11251 Hertel Street =1310 SIU do3sltl) - d iB 18
Jumps Velleg CA 91 To
on,of COMn-Ague Menses Prover VAUE Direct D10023.1 lndn W'Ag9232d us one.Hot R211R2 SIU do3sltl) - d 11 3
P. Cdlon,CA
radii, mre's We4x R¢tlematRn WMWD Direct- E1611R1 2205 n.11-d Stall 221320 SIU dO3.sltl) - 1 0 0
cl,I ano dream ry Corona�CA,..a
Canna Enm9Y partners WMWD Direct D101S emise 2 Corona CA 92B80 9Rmmn Street =1112 SIU 403sep - R 3 3 Peril Demander
D
Dart,Famare of America WA) WMWD Dill D1018-2 113E Weal Rmmn Street 3R59N SIU 403.5cp - 3 B 2 Res dmder ent Dea
C¢mmaCA 92880
DN Container Corymuon WMWD Dirt D10112.1 1505.Me de Slr n 3261d0 81U d035cp - d a 6
C¢remeCA 928on
Del Rea Feeds.LLC JCSD Dirt D10211.1 11.1 Intend Avenue Jump.Velleg CA 91]52 311991 SIU 403.51tl) - 8 16 12
EMWD Coledson Station SAWPA Dial D1055-R.R ..I Mass.Road RR1320 SIU do351tl) - d B 6
Menke,CA 92506
EMWD Energy Dissipate SAWPA Dimo- E1C8821 635 MImnom Slice 221MO SIU 403.5cp - R 0 0
Emmgerry Lehi Elandes,CA 92539
EMWD Perna Xee Dnalrellon SAWPA Dirty D1081-2.1 A.1 Muna.Read =1310 SIU dO3.51tl) - { 9 10
realityMeni Mended,CA 92596
EMWD Rains]Can,P'glre SAWPA DOS E1C8]3. d
1 dean Cent'Reed RR1320 SIU 403.5cp - R 0 0
Ertrtvger4y Carman LAM,CA 92587
IEUA Wasetion Station SAWPA Direct D1036-3.1 1609 El Pride Round China,,CA.1]10 221920 81U 403.51tl) - d B B
IEUA Us Seem- SAWPA DYEa E10P-R.1 ram lO Case,Cmuyl Avenue
n4y 2219RJ 81U 403.51tl) - R 0 0
rents A.1]90
Inane Te¢mmnal Pm¢d¢q 01915 Busness Pear dies
Cape. EMND IMixl 11034R.1 TemxW4 CA 92550 99H19 CIU d6B.18 T d t9 t0 Molybdenum race)
Intend BloeneW.LLC SAWPA Dill DI MIA 16OW Mount.In Avenue 56=19 81U 40.151tl) - R 6 a Perms Deatrvabtl
Case,CA.1]1.
Intend Empe Energy Cema EWD Direct D1N63 .2.MkMp.Roa]Manse,G 925B5 221112 CIU /23.17 - d Rs Rs
JCSD Celeurean AMem98taGn SAWPA Direst- E101221 `E.lemner Avenue .=.1320 81U 403.5(tl) - R 0 0
Emirect- .72.. n. A...
JCSD EtpeMa Meprng Saturn SAWPA Died, DI 1 EM,anda Avenue and N.of pI= SIU ws5M) - d @ 18
Belegeve Avenue
JCSD Hammy Lift Bletion SAWPA Direct EI0 2.3 cent H.mCA Avenue RR13W 81U 40sed) - 2 0 2
Empgerry Easlvale,CA 92880 A,,n
JCSD Hammer Modest 8lelion SAWPA Direct D10d53.1 5d10 Hemmer Avenue 2213W 81U dN.led) - d 12 16
E-1-le_CA91152
D
JCSD Hamscn Warning Stan SAWPA E Di. Avenue ire0.- E101T 23 59n v R213W 81U 4M.51tl) - 2 0 B
- 9Ees .le.CA9A Harrison Ae0
JCSD Schism Way Meaning Station SAWPA Direct E1113-1.1 E9tvad80 n CAl,r WeY R213W 81U 4M.5(tl) - 2 0 12
E Di.- Eesteae.CA Warn
JCSD Wimrile Mel ,Slane SAWPA Dien D10dS31 5101 Wineville Avenue R213W 81U 4M.5(d) - d 32 16
J u mp.Very,CA 91752
JCSD Roger D.TevyNm We SAWPA Direct D1g]0.A1 6150 Etiv.nda Avenue =1310 81U dN.5(tl) - d o T
Exchange Welts Treatment Pont Mae Lcm.,CA 917se
JSCD Weld,17 818 Ida EMahN SAWPA Dial DI.1 .14 De C.-t C-le R21y10 81U d0351d) - d B B
Treatment parity Jurupe Val,CA 91752
Meal container Cacaratim JCSD i Dial i D1N621 1n9W inked Avenua 952 332431 CIU NdAS)tl) - d RR d1
JurvPe VallaY.CA 9
Page 1 of 2
Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority(SAWPA)July 1,2017-June 30,2018
List of SIUs with Monitoring Compliance Status
Varied mrMI TfO Waiver No.of Agency SMR pollutants)In BNC
Facility Name contract Indirect Permit No. Physical Address NAICS Code Classification Regulation Dischm, Commend
agency DlachaMer Issued Inspections Samples Samples Violation Statue
Mission limn supply IEUA Di. D105731 s400 N1an 31reet 8123U SIV 403,5(d) - d 38 59
Chino,CA 91710
Mounlelnvkw Gera21hlg Sambre VALt£y mars m05612 2492 W,San 923Bre74 Ave R1112 CIV 42aI7 - d 20 20
ReOlarl, CA 23id
CL4 Energy-CMm IEUA Direct U1059-22 M01 Eucalyptus Avanoe yy1112 CIV dR3.P - d 20 35
CM1ino,CA 017.
Rome Wafer Condtoneg SBMWD Ines. lice 1 939W.Reece Street 561W0 se, 403.5(d) R 2 6
San Bemaaino,CA 0.11
Rems Inc. IEUA Direct DIrdRaA 14107 Monte Vbta Anvus 42N. 31V 403.5(d) - d 51 01 CBGNP(bcel)
Chno,CA 91710
SBMWO CdbGlon S. SAWPA Direct DICI.A 399 Ce"em Piece U1310 SIV 403.5(d) - d S 2
San F.—Irmo,CA$408
SBMWD Water Reclamation Fort SAWPA DIII E10ii22 NO Ceantlkr Piece yy13. all, 403.5(d) - 2 0 0
Small San BemerCmo,CA 92408
Sh.ar Plate Pmleclbn,L. IEUA sm. HO/L21 1400c5aCBemartlinogW. .1112 CIV 433.17 N 4 3! 01 PH ticta ord) )'
FontanSan Bernard—
and LI(Mtl)
SMnghlkw permanents Faulily SAWPA DY 1 D1W 3 U.F,e Street 552810 31V 405.5(G) - 4 45 244
Jump,Vellep CA 92508
Temeaeal Deetller WMWD DYect D1012-2, 755 Public Sakti Wry Comm CA 91860 U1310 $IV 405.5(G) - 4 S 4
a
WMWD Airington CocaXm SAWPA DY 1 Dmi I m lI SIetling Avarua U131031V 403.5(d) - 4 S 4
Riverstle,CA 92503
WMWD Collection station SAWPA DY 1 D1087 sl 2101 Railrwtl See.Comm CA 91880 yy1y20 $IV 405.5(G) - 4 S 4
a
WRCRWA Soon Regional pumping 3p1yPA Dial EIDB&21 671 N.Lincoln Avenue U1310 31V 403.5(d) - 2 0 1B
SMlbn Ertagemy C,mna CA.883
YVWD Henry WOCMaR R]inal Wady 3NWpA DY 1 Dial NOW.C,unty Lee LaW yy1y20 31V 405.5(G) - 4 12 15
Ra,ding Facky Callmesa CA 92320
Page 2 of 2
z9
3he
3
he
3
i 3 n y
33
he
na nc m
v v 2
z
N D Floxgl
Aluminum Chip geatltt
'main.penmel
a[M1anee
-1 Fdrsmne M., 9
A
FlMmlessw4el Mtmx,llnp 3
DHex.CM1mme fletluctlan N C
Crass flow niOfllm Memmkj G GD
f
Fqualmtlan S D
A A �
o d �
w �
x PH Aajuenumm d d
N K
Below Gwntldarifier r1 =
N �
K
FlMmwmmng/plMe-out m o
a 00
clex—m—heneattar d
a
N
3
croon aaaomHon �
cemnNganum
pH Anion
xenimxtment
ClomwoAxmelle sNHy
CoxgmapoNFlomulatloo
Hvamxmepmapnanon
x
HI@.r
SIWge ThI[kenlq lank
gomnnn Hlrerllamyl
he
C o
v
Appendix H
SAWPA Pretreatment Program
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment Fiscal Year 2017-2018
a t 5 py
Permit
Number Permittee Category 6 : Y - $ c p % § Y 9 Other
P'_ a t e €
Is
California Institution SIU e
D100G2.1 for Men(CIMI 40 CFR 0.19" X
403.5(d)
Grease
D1007-2.1 Californifor
Institution n 40 CFR 0.4 x Interceptors
for Women(CIW) g03.5(di and Sewage
Grinder
C.C.Graber CIO Sand filters,
I3005-2.1 Company 40 CFR N/A %407.64 Cartridge fifers
Chino Develo IU
D1011-3.1 Pment 40 CFR 1.0 %
Corporation 403.5(d)
Eastside Water IU
130242.1 Treatment Plant 40 CFR N/A X
403.5(d)
IV
D1032-2.1 Green River Golf 40 CFR N/A X Grease
Club 403.5(d) Interceptor
Gapeland Peaker IV
11122-1.1 Generating Station 40 CFR N/A X
403.5(df
SIU
D3057-3.1 Mission Vied Supply 40 CFR 0.7128 X X X X Shaker Screens
403.5(df
IV
111141.1 Niagara Bottling,LLC 40 CFR N/A X
403.5(df
CIU
D1059-2.2 OILS Energy-Chino 40 CFR 0.1296 % X
423.17
SIU GEM,drum and
D1069-3.1 Repet,Inc. 40 CFR 0.0432 % % % X X % % shaker screens
403.5(d)
San Antonio Regional SIU
1309fi-2.1 Hospital 40 CFR N/A %
403.5(d)
ShawCor Pipe CIU
11077-2.1 Protection,LLC 40 CFR N/A % % % X
433.1]
2 of 10
IEUA
Appendix H
SAWPA Pretreatment Program
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment Fiscal Year 2017-2018
Permit
Number Permittee Category e $ v @ Y A Other
x g z z
n 5 re F
lU Sand/oil
D1001-1.1 ADESA Los Angeles 40 CFR 0.02 %
interceptors
403.5(d)
SIU DAF&
D1021-2.1 Del Real Foods,LLC 40 CFR 0.190164 x % x x x % Automated
403.5(d) chemical feed
IU D1053-2.1 Magnolia Foods 40 CFR 0.00356 x x Grease
easep[or
403.5(d)
Metal Container CIU
D1056-2.1 Corp mtlon 40 CFR 0.150590 % x % x % % % Oil skimming
465.45
Wakunaga of IU
D3084-2.1 America Co.,Plant 4o CFR (IOD5841 x
No.1 403.5(d)
Wakunaga of IU Bioxide
D1085-1.1 America Co.,Plant 4D CFR DOD5841 x x %
No.2 403.5(d) injeRion
JCSD
3 of 10
Appendix H
SAWPA Pretreatment Program
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
e
Permi
Number Permxtee Category - $ �+ .. a e fi g _ v @ c = Other
6 2 z e € E m
n s F E
Or
ra
SIU
D1D81-3.1 Chino l Desalter 40 CFR 2.05 %
403.5(d)
SIU
D1010-3.1 Chino ll Desalter 40 CFR 1.62 x
403.5)d)
SIU
D1055-2.2 EMWD Collection Station 40 CFR N/A X
403.5(d)
SIU
E1068-21 EMWD Energy Dissipater 40 CFR 9.50 %
403.5(d)
D1061-2.1 EMWDPerrls&Menlfee U
g01CFR 2.59 X nnrena�,erem ssoa mr
Desalination Facility —d—n.—
403.51d)
E S
MWD Railroad Canyon I
E106]-3.1 Pipeline 40 9.50 X
403.5)d)
IU
I1102-2.1 EMWD RWRF Scrubber Waste 40 CFR N/A X
403.5(d)
SIU
D1035-3.1 IEUA Collection Station 40 CFR N/A X
403.5(d)
SIU
E1037-2.1 IEUA(WsSenanOs) 40 CFR 9.0 X
403.5(d)
SIU
D1072-2.1 Inland Bioenergy,LLC 40 CFR D.200 % X X
403.5(d)
1CSD Archibald Metering IU
E1041-2.1 Station 40 CFR 1.115 X
403.5 d
1CSD Celebration Metering SIU
F11E1p42-2.1 Station 403.5)d3.5(d 0.1]0 %
)
4 of 10 SAWPA
Appendix H
SAWPA Pretreatment Program
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Parent Permittee Category ' e - s g — P '_ _ $ Mar
Number M i 2
E-1043-2.1 1CSD Chandler Lift Station IU 1.115 X
SIU
ICSD Etiwanda Metering
01094-3.1 Station 40 CFR 1.155 X
4o3.5(d)
SIU
E1046-2.3 1CSD Hamner Lift Station 40 CFR 0.960 X
403.5(d)
SIU
D3045-3.1 1CSD Hamner Metering Station 40 CFR 1.155 X
403.5(d)
SIU
E1047-2.3 1CSD Harrison Metering Station 40 CFR 0.940 X
403.5(d)
ICSD Roger D.Teagarden Ion SIU
DID]0-3.1 Exchange WfP 40 CFR 0.30 X
403.5 d
ICSD Scholar Way Metering SIU
E1113-1.1 Station 40 CFR 1.115
403.5 d
ICSD Wells 17&18 Ion SIU
D1040.3.1 Exchange Treatment Facility 40 CFR 0.0066 %
403.5id)
ICSD Wineville Metering SIU
D1048-3.1 Station 40 CFR 1.155 %
403.5(d)
SIU
D1076-3.1 SRMWD Collection Station 40 CFR N/A aoa so.
403.5(d)
SBMWD Water Reclamation SIU
E10]5-2.2 Plant 40CFR 2.50 %
403.S(d)
A
nae
SIU ,.,Ixuiurx,—an
DID79-3 Sti low Pretreatment p-,p,bt,i,, mm h
Facility 40 CFR 0.259 X X X % smnubed
403.5(d) AWvMedQrbon
AMa
WMWD Arington Desalter SIU
D1088-3.1 Facility 40 CFR 1.40 X
403.5 d
SIU
D1087-3.1 WMWD Collection Station 40CF N/A %
403.SidR)
50ffo SAWPA
Appendix H
SAWPA Pretreatment Program
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
�4 E
Permit — = $ 9 € s $ d c e g
Number PermRtee Category V i -m s e g a g9g x §E 6 -a other
9 g e a $
WRCRWA South Regional 51U
E1089-2.1 4o Pumping Station CFR 3.565 X abnnaion
Ping 403.5(d)
YVWD Henry Wochholx SIU
o1MG-2.2 Regional Water Recycling 4 CFR 0.595 X p--.smon.
Facility 4 3.5(A)
6orb SAWPA
Appendix H
SAWPA Pretreatment Program
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment Fiscal Year 2017-2018
Permit
er Numb Permlttee Category g g x_" i c Y q § Other
k g c g E IF
A -
lu
13003-3.1 Angelica Tc ile 40 CFR N/A %
403.5(d)
East Valley Water Dlstdat lu
11023-2.2 Well#107 40 CFR N/A %
403.5(d)
IU
11026-2.1 Farmdale Creamery,I nc. 40 CFR N/A % EC Meter
403.5(d)
Lama Linda University Ill
IID51-2.1 power Plant 40 CFR N/A % IDS Meter
403.5 d
Lama Linda Veterans IU
11052-3.1 MediwlCenter 40 .5(IFR N/A %
403.5 d
IU
11111-1.2 Niagara Bottlin&LLC 40 CFR N/A %
403.5(d)
IU
1IND-2.1 Patton State Hospital 40 CFR N/A % EC Meter
403.5(d)
SIU
11066-2.1 Rayne Water Conditioning 40 CFR N/A % EC Meer
403.5id)
7 of 10
SBMWD
Appendix H
SAWPA Pretreatment Program
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
2 £
Permit ' s `
Number Permi[tee Category y c g g v y 3 $ p Other
3
js
of Cokon-Aqua SIU Ultra-Filtration
City 01002-3.1 Citya Power Plan[ 40 CFR 0.M2 X &Reverse
Mania 403.5idi Osmosis
Mountaimoew CIU
01058-1.2 Generating Station 40 CFR 0.432 % % X % % Filtration
423.17
80f 10
VALLEY DISTRICT
Appendix H
SAWPA Pretreatment Program
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment Fiscal Year 2017-2018
ti ts ZJ_ _
2 = Y a _ - _ ' - - =
Permit t7 s = c c c o
LZ
Number Permlttee Category E u E u N 8 .� E E _ _ _ other
IS
a - - z - o o
Anita B. SIU
D1074-3.1 Smith 40 CFR 0.030 X
Treatment 4W.S(d)
Facilt
Cry of I
D1125-1 Corona's Ion 40 CFR 0.017
Exchange 403.5(d)
Plant
City of
Corona's SIU
E1013-2.1 Water 40 CFR NA X
Reclamation 403.5(d)
Facility No.1
Corona SIU
D1015-2 Energy OO CFR 0.100 X X X
Partners 403.5(d)
Corona D
11016-3.1 Regional 0CFR NA %
Medical 403.5(d)
Center
Dairy slu
D1018-2 Farmers of 40 CFR 0.950 X X % %
America 403.5(d)
Dart SIU
D1019-2.1 Container 40 CFR 0.030 X X X %
Corporation 403.5(d)
Decra I
11020-2.1 Roofing 40 CFR NA % X % % %
Stems 403.5(d)
Frutarom IU
D1029-2.1 USA Inc 40 CFR O.ODS % X X X X
403.5(d)
Giuliano& IU
1ID31-2.1 Sons Briners 40 CFR 0.odo % X X X % %
003.Sid)
9 of 10
WMWD
Appendix H
SAWPA Pretreatment Program
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Hidden Villa M
11121-1.1 Ranch 40 CFR NA X
403.5(d)
La Sierra I
13U50.3.1 University 40 CFR NA X
403.5(d)
Prudential I
I11l62-3 Overall 4tl CFR NA %
Supply 403.5(d)
Qualified I
I1f164-3.1 Mobile,Inc. QCFR NA X X X
403.5(d)
Slerra I
I11178-3 Aluminum 4tl CFR NA %
Company 403.5 tl
Temescal SIU
01012-21 Oesater 40 CFR 2.15 % X % %
403.5 tl
Wellington I
01086-2.1 Foods,Inc. 40 CFR 0,020 % X % %
403.5(tl)
10 of 10
WMWD
THE PRESS-ENTERPRISE Ad PUBLIC ulamllesione.
NOTICE -Failure to ppro-
It accordanceublic redo requlred
with the aan re- reports hot lud-
gpqOrteciPatlon to- Ina, but not Ilm-
1825Chkaga Ave.Suite 100 Colde oeFederaal selfm,onitoring
Riverside,CA M07 Re plotions reporh and re-
951684-1200 (CFRI Part 25 ports with com-
In the antorce- pliance sched-
951-368-9018FRX mart of Nation- ales within 45
al Pretreatment days of the due
PROOF OF PUBLICATION Standards and dale
(2010,2015.5 C.C.P) ca OeFned by 40 cuateey treport
403.81f)(21(v101 noncompliance
the SSanta Ana with discharge
Pubilwtkn(s):The Pree"nNrpnse Watershed Prol- limits or any
act Authority other require.
herreby APublish blento thepuser
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF Ing I full". FurSWtt to
Ing lst of 5 A W P A - S
Ad Del /3174993 Permiltem who, Wastewater
during July i, Discharge It
2017 through ulatlons (Orre-
June 30, 1018, radical.
I am a dawn of the United-States. I am over the age of eighteen years were IdentlRV Any other via.
and not a party W or interested in the above entitled matter. I am an as industries n lotion or group
signiauthorized representative of THE PRESS-ENTERPRISE,an er in comp"
With of violations,
P B1"'Pap cpmpicant with which the
g6dier21 dreulation,printed and published daily In the County of Riverside, wastewater dis- wastewater
and which newspaper he;been adfudcated a newspaper of general charge $food treatment Plant
brwle0on by the Superior Court of fhe County of Riverside,Stale of arse. An indue• determines will
Da try is In slgnlil- adversely affect
Caltorida,urderdMafApol 25,1952,Case Number54446,under dam tend If moonheir la he operation
o r
of Maron 29,1957,Case Number85879,underside of August25, 1995, lotion meets v0idrye of the Pretreat-
or Casa Number 2fi78fi4,aM under data of SepNmbw it,2013,Cesa or more of Ve. ment Program.
Number MC;1309013;that the notice,of which the annexed is is printed following trite- Summary Of
ropy,has been published in said newspaper in accordance with the ria: Permlttees In
Chronic viola- Significant
Instructions of the person(s)requesting publication,and ml in any Lions of ties• Noneompll.
supplement therei the following dates,to wit: charge limits once Fiscal
occurring when Year2017-2018
66% or mom of Permittess
all measure- with Dls-
09l1912018 the
clicheexceed chi tioni ola-
limits for tie Company
some pollutant Name
during a six Giuliano & Sons
I barely(or dealers)under party of perjury that the fougono Is true month Period. Briners, Inc.
and coned. -Technical Re- Permit No.
view Criteria vi. 11031-2.1
olatlans of dis- City
Oafs:September 19,2018 charge, limits Bloomington
At: Riverside,Califanle occurring when 9119A9
33% or main of CNS-3174993►
all measure- THE PRESS
mania equal or E N T E R -
. __—:; ._ exceedlhe-pand. _PRISE._-
act of the nu- -
menef yStandaarrd
Legal Advertising Represantatw,The Press-Endarpdae or Re ui�remled by
CALIF NEWSPAPERSERV BUREAU I CALIF NEWSPAPER SERVICE TRC aduYllnpble
BUREAU,CLIENT six month P9rt-
PO BOX 60460 ad.
LOS ANGELES,CA MID Any other vlo-
lotion of a Pre-
treatment
Standard or Re-
AdNumben 00111747511-01 ulremenr that
tt a POTW de-
termines has
P.D.Number. 3174293 musedlnte
us a Pass
Through.
-Any discharge
0f o pollutant
�
80IIIIIIpIpII Iuu�pXl� 1f�IRR IuuI��tI11 IRI II - 1n� II�I�ap1nI WIy1I1 that has caused ulll Alll II,II III IOu 11��Y��III�IIII10111 tlIII q1 Immanent an.
dongerment to
human health,
welfare• A 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 7 0 4 1 7 a environm to the
environment.
wit-Failuremeet
withinn90 days
alter the ached-
bile date,a comom-
pliance ached-
appendix i
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR JULY 2017
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
1928251 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03
Sampler 1928252 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02
1928253 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02
1928254 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02
Sampler B 1928255 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02
1928256 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Avg. Deviation
natysis results are reported in mg/L. Results above 0.0 Table Average
he RL am shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
1994769 0.1 0.02 1.4 0.03 0.02 0.08
1-021735
1965490 0.1 0.02 1.49 0.04 0.02 0.09
Relative
6.2 % Difference
1994770 0.1 0.02 0.49 0.34 0.02 0.06
1-011073
1965392 0.1 0.02 0.53 0.37 0.02 0.06
Relative
7.8 8.5 % Difference
1994771 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.05
1-011265
1965443 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.06
Relative
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.2 % Difference
1994772 0.75 0.07 1.09 0.4 0.04 28.9
1-011066
1970084 0.77 0.07 1.14 0.42 0.03 29.7
Relative
2.6 4.5 4.9 2.7 % Difference
1% 0% 5% 4% 0% 10% Analyte Avg. RPD
3% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR AUGUST 2017
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2003392 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler 2003393 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2003394 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2003395 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
Sampler B 2003396 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2003397 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Avg. Deviation
reported in ong/L. Results above 0.0 Table Average
[=alyslsesul
e RL are shown in bold font Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2006834 0.1 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.07
1-141007
1970107 0.1 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.06
Relative
% Difference
1970159 0.1 0.35 0.34 0.02 0.02 1.01
1-021253
1970159 0.1 0.33 0.36 0.02 0.03 0.95
Relative
5.9 5.7 6.1 % Difference
2006838 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.07
1-141163
1970024 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.06
Relative
% Difference
2006839 0.1 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.04
1-511399
1969158 0.1 0.03 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.05
Relative
% Difference
0% 6% 6% 0% 0% 6% Analyte Avg. RPD
3% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 limes the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICI
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR SEPTEMBER 2017
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2010027 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04
Sampler 2010028 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
2010029 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2010030 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler B 2010031 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2010032 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 Avg. Deviation
nelysls results are reported in mglL. Results 0.1 Table Average
above the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2010034 0.1 0.02 1.20 0.16 0.02 0.03
1-011142
1980750 0.1 0.02 1.12 0.15 0.02 0.02
Relative
6.90 6.5 %Difference
2010035 0.1 0.02 0.14 0.02 0.02 0.13
1-021088
1982110 0.1 0.02 0.14 0.02 0.02 0.12
Relative
0.0 8.00 %Difference
2010036 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.08
Metering Station
1980820 0.1 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.12
Relative
%Difference
2010037 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.45 0.02 0.02
1-021424
1981434 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.42 0.02 0.04
Relative
6.9 %Difference
0% 0% 3% 7% 0% 8% Analyte Avg. RPD
3% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs.Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICI
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR OCTOBER 2017
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2015514 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05
Sampler 2015515 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04
2015516 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05
2015517 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05
Sampler B 2015518 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05
2015519 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Avg. Deviation
nelysis results are reported in mg/L. Results 0.0 Table Average
above the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2015504 0.1 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02
1-511389
1982912 0.1 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02
Relative
%Difference
2015505 0.1 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04
1-521836
1987567 0.1 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04
Relative
% Difference
2015596 0.1 0.02 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.24
1-521748
1982625 0.1 0.02 0.11 0.02 0.02 0.23
Relative
9.5 4.3 %Difference
2015597 0.1 0.23 0.09 0.41 0.02 2.3
1-061138
1987502 0.1 0.24 0.03 0.42 0.02 0.02
Relative
4.3 2.4 196.6 %Difference
0% 4% 10% 2% 0% 100% Analyte Avg. RPD
19% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs.Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICI
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR NOVEMBER 2017
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m IL
2025285 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
SamplerA 2025286 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2025301 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2025302 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler B 2025303 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2025304 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Avg. Deviation
nalysis results are reported In mg/L. Results 0.0 Table Average
above the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2025324 0.1 0.07 0.02 1.43 0.02 0.05
1-521828
1988859 0.1 0.08 0.02 1.52 0.02 0.07
Relative
6.1 %Difference
2025325 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.4 0.02 0.02
1-011064
1990141 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.37 0.02 0.03
Relative
7.8 % Difference
2025332 0.1 0.16 0.18 0.91 0.02 0.18
1-521798
1987944 0.1 0.16 0.17 0.83 0.02 0.2
Relative
0.0 5.7 9.2 10.5 %Difference
2025338 0.1 0.02 0.03 0.11 0.02 0.04
1-011257
1993228 0.1 0.02 0.03 0.11 0.02 0.07
Relative
0.0 %Difference
0% 0% 6% 6% 0% 11% Analyte Avg. RPD
4% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICI
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR DECEMBER 2017
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2030053 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
Sampler 2030054 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04
2030055 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
2030056 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.07
Sampler B 2030057 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.07
2030058 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.07
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 Avg. Deviation
nelysls results are reported in mg/L. Results 0.3 Table Average
above the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2030061 0.1 0.02 0.48 0.02 0.02 0.07
1-021133
2000484 0.1 0.02 0.49 0.02 0.02 0.07
Relative
2.1 %Difference
2030062 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05
Strin fellow
1995153 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05
Relative
% Difference
2030064 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.14
1-071172
2000720 0.100 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.19
Relative
30.3 %Difference
2030072 0.1 0.02 0.35 0.02 0.02 0.04
1-011138
2001223 0.1 0.02 0.38 0.02 0.02 0.06
Relative
8.2 %Difference
0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 30% Analyte Avg.Rill
6% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs.Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICI
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR JANUARY 2018
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2040278 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler 2040279 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2040280 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2040281 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04
Sampler B 2040282 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04
2040283 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 Avg. Deviation
nelysls results are reported in mglL. Results 0.2 Table Average
above the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2040295 0.1 0.02 0.21 0.02 0.02 0.06
1-021088
2003327 0.1 0.02 0.21 0.02 0.02 0.07
Relative
0.0 % Difference
2040296 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04
1-031065
2007708 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04
Relative
Difference
2040297 0.1 0.02 1.43 0.14 0.02 0.03
1-011142
2001901 0.1 0.02 1.52 0.15 0.02 0.02
Relative
6.1 6.9 % Difference
2040298 0.1 0.02 0.43 0.02 0.02 0.46
1-021192
2001920 0.1 0.04 0.4 0.02 0.02 0.43
Relative
7.2 6.7 %Difference
0% 0% 4% 7% 0% 7% Analyte Avg. RPD
3% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs.Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICI
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR FEBRUARY 2018
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2045630 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler 2045631 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2045632 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2045633 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler B 2045634 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2045635 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Avg. Deviation
nelysis results are reported in mg/L. Results 0.0 Table Average
above the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2045661 0.1 0.02 0.11 0.13 0.02 0.03
1-011073
2008459 0.1 0.02 0.11 0.13 0.02 0.04
Relative
0.0 0.0 %Difference
2045662 0.1 0.02 0.17 0.07 0.05 0.26
1-031295
2013920 0.04 0.02 0.2 0.07 0.04 0.26
Relative
16.2 0.0 %Difference
2045663 0.1 0.02 0.02 27.4 0.02 0.05
1-021226
2009378 0.04 0.02 0.02 25.8 0.02 0.06
Relative
6.0 %Difference
2045664 0.1 0.02 0.89 0.07 0.02 1.38
1-551152
2013092 0.1 0.02 0.89 0.08 0.02 1.42
Relative
0.0 2.9 %Difference
0% 0% 5% 3% 0% 1% Analyte Avg. RPD
2% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs.Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICI
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR MARCH 2O18
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu NI Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2051839 0.1 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.06
Sampler A 2051846 0.1 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.05
2051847 0.1 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.05
2051848 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.08
Sampler B 2051849 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.08
2051850 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.08
0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 Avg. Deviation
nalysis results are reported in mgl . Results 0.4 Table Average
bove the RL are shown in bold Pont Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2051874 0.1 0.02 0.9 0.02 0.03 0.02
1-021133
2019942 0.1 0.02 0.84 0.02 0.04 0.02
Relative
6.9 % Difference
2051875 0.1 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.18
1-021289
20179050 0.1 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.19
Relative
5.4 % Difference
2051876 0.1 0.02 0.06 14.7 0.02 0.24
1-021337
2016363 0.1 0.02 0.04 14.3 0.02 0.23
Relative
2.8 4.3 % Difference
2051877 0.1 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.03
Metering Station
2016494 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
Relative
% Difference
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% Analyte Avg. RPD
1% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICI
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR APRIL 2018
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2057527 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
Sampler 2057526 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
2057517 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
2057518 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler B 2057525 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2057524 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 Avg. Deviation
nelysis results are reported in mglL. Results 0.1 Table Average
above the RL are shown in bold font. Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2057541 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
1-531405
2021559 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Relative
%Difference
2057542 0.1 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.13
1-531391
2020911 0.1 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05
Relative
% Difference
2057543 0.1 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.06
1-111018
2027331 0.1 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.05
Relative
%Difference
2057544 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
1-521846
2021590 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Relative
% Difference
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Analyte Avg. RPD
0% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs.Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QA/QC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR MAY 2018
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2060175 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04
Sampler 2060176 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.09
2060177 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04
2060178 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05
Sampler B 2060182 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05
2060183 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 Avg. Deviation
reported in ong/L. Results above 0.2 Table Average
[=alyslsesul
e RL are shown in bold font Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2060184 0.1 0.02 0.21 0.02 0.02 0.04
1-571295
2030968 0.1 0.02 0.21 0.02 0.02 0.04
Relative
0.0 % Difference
206185 0.1 0.02 0.19 0.02 0.02 0.07
1-031049
2028498 0.1 0.02 0.17 0.02 0.02 0.07
Relative
11.1 % Difference
2060186 0.1 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.02 Z39
1-021422
2029206 0.1 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.02 Z24
Relative
6.5 % Difference
2060187 0.1 0.02 1.23 0.31 0.02 0.02
1-011142
2028380 0.1 0.02 1.18 0.31 0.02 0.02
Relative
4.1 0.0 % Difference
0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 6% Analyte Avg. RPD
2% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
SOURCE CONTROL DIVISION
QAIQC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR JUNE 2018
Equipment Blank Evaluation
Equipment Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Reporting Limit
RL m /L
2071770 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04
Sampler 2071771 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
2071772 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
2071773 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Sampler B 2071774 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2071775 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 Avg. Deviation
nalysis results are reported In mglL. Results above 0.1 Table Average
the RL are shown in bold for
Deviation
Archive Sample Evaluation
Permit# Archive# Original# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn
2071725 0.1 1.61 0.4 0.03 0.07 1.68
1-021253
2040040 0.1 1.62 0.41 0.03 0.06 1.84
Relative
0.6 2.5 9.1 % Difference
2071726 0.1 0.02 0.25 0.02 0.04 9.84
1-011262
2039295 0.1 0.02 0.11 0.02 0.03 0.02
Relative
77.8 199.2 % Difference
2071727 0.1 0.02 0.24 0.02 0.02 0.56
1-521805
2070353 0.1 0.02 0.24 0.02 0.02 0.57
Relative
0.0 1.8 % Difference
2071752 0.1 0.02 0.62 0.1 0.02 0.03
1-021070
2035660 0.1 0.02 0.61 0.1 0.02 0.08
Relative
1.6 % Difference
0% 1% 20% 0% 0% 70% Analyte Avg. RPD
15% Table Average
RPD
Results and RLs reported in mg/L. Results at or below the Reporting Limits are shown as the RLs. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Italic bold numbers are greater than 20 times the RLs. Comparisons are made only for results
greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT-RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION
SAMPLE COLLECTION CHECK RESULTS JUL-SEP 2017
Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
2008457 0.100 0.05 0.02 0.09 0.02 0.29 22
Sampler 2008435 0.100 0.04 0.04 0.09 0.02 0.31 25
A 2008436 0.100 0.04 0.02 0.09 0.02 0.27 23
2008437 0.100 0.04 0.03 0.08 0.02 0.28 23
2008439 0.100 0.04 0.02 0.09 0.02 0.25 23
average 0.100 0.04 0.03 0.09 0.02 0.28 23
range 0.000 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.06 3
Sampler Avg. Deviation 0.02 1
Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
2008438 0.100 0.04 0.03 0.09 0.02 0.27 20
Sampler 2008440 0.100 0.04 0.03 0.09 0.02 0.25 19
B 2008441 0.100 0.04 0.03 0.08 0.02 0.24 22
2008442 0.100 0.04 0.03 0.08 0.02 0.24 22
2008443 0.100 0.04 0.03 0.08 0.02 0.24 21
average 0.100 0.04 0.03 0.08 0.02 0.25 21
range 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 3
ampler Avg. Deviation 0.01 1
Site Relative Percent Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
Difference 12.1 11
Reporting Limits 0.100 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 1
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT-RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION
SAMPLE COLLECTION CHECK RESULTS,OCT-DEC 2017
Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
2027768 0.100 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 141
Sampler 2027747 0.100 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 157
A 2027746 0.100 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 153
2027745 0.100 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 148
2027743 0.100 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 158
average 0.100 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 151
range 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 17
Sampler Avg. Deviation 6
Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
2027767 0.100 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 167
Sampler 2027763 0.100 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 145
B 2027762 0.100 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 142
2027761 0.100 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 156
2027760 0.100 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 154
average 0.100 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 153
range 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25
ampler Av . Deviation 7
Site Relative Percent Cd Cr Cu NI Pb Zn TSS
Difference 1
Re ortin Limits 0.100 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 1
esu are s own on y or resu s greater Man D UrreS Ine MePORIng LIMIL cold numbers are
results above the RLs. Results and RLs are reported in Mo/L.
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT-RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION
SAMPLE COLLECTION CHECK RESULTS,JAN-MAR 2018
Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
2047206 0.100 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.02 4
Sampler 2047207 0.100 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.02 5
A 2047208 0.100 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.02 5
2047209 0.100 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.02 4
2047211 0.100 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.02 6
average 0.100 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.02 5
range 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2
ampler Avg. Deviation
Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
2047201 0.100 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.02 8
Sampler 2047202 0.100 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.02 7
B 2047204 0.100 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.02 7
2047205 0.100 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.02 7
2047223 0.100 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.02 8
average 0.100 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.02 7
range 0.000 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1
ampler Avg. Devlatlon 0
Site Relative Percent Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
Difference 42
Reporting Limits 0.100 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT-RESOURCE PROTECTION DIVISION
SAMPLE COLLECTION CHECK RESULTS,APR-JUN 2018
Sample# Cd Cr Cu NI Pb Zn TSS
2059766 0.100 0.57 0.11 1.53 0.33 7.61 197
Sampler 2059287 0.100 0.54 0.09 1.47 0.33 7.34 188
A 2059288 0.100 0.56 0.10 1.50 0.33 7.50 180
2059289 0.100 0.52 0.10 1.47 0.31 7.25 184
2059290 0.100 0.52 0.10 1.50 0.32 7.34 168
average 0.100 0.54 0.10 1.49 0.32 7.41 183
range 0.000 0.05 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.36 29
ampler Av . Deviation 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.12 8
Sample# Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
2059291 0.100 0.48 0.09 1.43 0.30 6.86 181
Sampler 2059293 0.100 0.49 0.09 1.45 0.31 6.98 182
B 2059292 0.100 0.47 0.09 1.38 0.29 6.65 187
2059294 0.100 0.46 0.09 1.38 0.28 6.67 200
2059295 0.100 0.46 0.09 1.36 0.28 6.53 206
average 0.100 0.47 0.09 1.40 0.29 6.74 191
range 0.000 0.03 0.00 0.09 0.03 0.45 25
ampler Av . Deviation 0.01 0.03 0.0 0.1 9
Site Relative Percent Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn TSS
Difference 13.81 6.50 10.4 9.5 4
ilReporting Limts 0.100 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 1
Results are shown only for results greater than 5 times the Reporting Limit. Bold numbers are
results above the RLs. Results and RLs are reported in mg/L.
appendix j
PERMITTEES WITH PRETREATMENT
EQUIPMENT
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
v —
a
m �
c v w a
O O c C E m m c 0 uoo o �' s
C = y v� vi N C rl N - W p C
W N q Z N
Permit m C C .. o
No. m
Facility Name Regulation c on ;9 °- u a s x A M
w
w 3 0. o Z M w c
^' E 2 m y c
N N E d
C O O o N H E Y V
LL W m a E o 0 0 0 3 0 o a c o F o. o. u z
w y m E ° 2 a 3 H m .6
o a a w o 'c c c ou '" 'c
Q V V V V U V U V U V V V w w w 2 0 0 2 a a ,n o
19200 Holly Street, LLC 1-581176 403.5(d) x x
9W Halo Western opCo, L.P. 1-600378 403.5(d) x
A&G Electropolish 1-531422 433.17(a)
A& R Powder Coating, Inc. 1-021088 433.17(a)
Accurate Circuit Engineering 1-011138 433.17(a)
Active Plating, Inc. 1-011115 433.17(a) x x x x x. .
Advance Tech Plating, Inc. 1-021389 433.17(a)
Air Industries Company,A PCC Company( 1-031013 403.5(d)
Air Industries Company,A PCC Company( 1-531404 433.15(a),
All Metals Processing of O.C., Inc. 1-031110 433.17(a) x x x x x x x x x x x
Allied Electronics Services, Inc. 1-011073 433.17(a)
Alloy Die Casting Co. 1-531437 464.15(a).
Alloy Tech Electropolishing, Inc. 1-011036 433.17(a)
Alsco, Inc. 1-021656 403.5(d)
Aluminum Forge-Div. of Alum. Precision 1-071035 467.46
Aluminum Precision Products, Inc. -Susan 1-031300 467.45,
Aluminum Precision Products, Inc. Central 1-011038 467.45 X x
Page 1 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
v —
a
m �
c v w a
O O c C E m m c 0 uoo o �' s
C = y v� vi N C rl N - W (1 C
W N q x N
Permit m C C .. c
No. a;
Facility Name Regulation on ;9 °- u a s x A M
w
w 3 a o Z M w c
^' E 2 m y c
N N N d
C O O o N H £ Y V
LL W m a G o 0 0 0 3 0 o n 9 4 F m °_ a v m LL z
w y m m m M I s a
o n o m w o m v x 3 `o a v `w
10R10 o m N C _ ] L
u V u V u V u V u V u V w w w 2 0 0 a a a ,n o
American Circuit Technology, Inc. 1-021249 433.17(a) x x x x x
Amerimax Building Products, Inc. 1-021102 465.35 • x
Ameripec, Inc. 1-031057 403.5(d)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Anaheim Extrusion Co., Inc. 1-021168 467.35(c)
Andres Technical Plating 1-521798 433.17(a)
AnoChem Coatings 1-600295 433.17(a) • x . . x
Anodyne, Inc. 1-511389 433.17(a)
Anomil Ent. Dba Danco Metal Surfacing 1-011155 433.17(a)
APCT Orange County 1-600503 433.17(a)
Arconic Global Fasteners& Rings, Inc. 1-021081 433.15(a), x x x x x x x x x x
ARO service 1-021192 433.17(a)
. . . I . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Arrowhead Products Corporation 1-031137 433.17(a)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Astech Engineered Products, Inc. 1-571295 433.17(a) x
Auto-Chlor System of Washington, Inc. 1-511384 417.166
Aviation Equipment Processing 1-071037 433.17(a)
Basic Electronics, Inc. 1-031094 433.17(a)
Ba.Houston Co. 1-031010 403.5(d) x
Page 2 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
v —
a
m �
c v w a
O O c C E m m c 0 uoo o �' s
C = y v� vi N C rl N - W p C
W N q Z N
Permit m C C .. o
No. m
Facility Name Regulation c on ;9 °- u a s x A M
w
w 3 a o Z M w c
^' E 2 m y c
N N N d
C O O o N H £ Y V
LL W m a E o 0 0 0 ; p o n c ° F m °_ a v m u z
w m ? m m M I as a
o n o m w o m v
10R10 O N N C
Q V Q V u V u V u V Q V w w w 2
Beckman Coulter, Inc. 1-521824 433.17(a)
Beo-Mag Plating 1-511370 433.17(a) x
Bimbo Bakeries Usa, Inc. 1-521838 403.5(d)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Black Oxide Industries, Inc. 1-021213 433.17(a)
Blue Lake Energy 1-521785 403.5(d)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Boeing Company(Graham) 1-111018 433.17(a) x • x
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brasstech, Inc. 1-511368 433.17(a) r
Brea Power II, LLC 1-521837 403.5(d)
Bridge Energy, LLC 1-600398 403.5(d)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bridgemark Corporation 1-521844 403.5(d) •
Brindle/Thomas-Bradley 1-531428 403.5(d)
. . . . . . I . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brindle/Thomas-Brooks& Kohlbush 1-531429 403.5(d)
Brindle/Thomas-Catalina&Copeland 7531430 403.5(d)
Brindle/Thomas-Dabney&Patton 1-531427 403.5(d)
Bristol Industries 1-021226 433.15(a),
Burlington Engineering, Inc. 1-521770 433.17(a)
Cadillac Plating, Inc. 3 . . . . . . . . x x . .
1-021062 433.17(a) H- [X x
Page 3 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
v —
a
m �
c v w a
O O
c C E m m J m o a s
C = cy v� vi N C rl N - W p C
W N q x N
Permit m C
w C .. o
No. m
Facility Name Regulation on ;° °- u V a s x A M
o V V M W H H c
^' E 2
N N E d
C O O o N H Y V
LL W m a E o 0 0 0 3 0 o n 9 4 F m °_ a v m LL z
w m ? m m M I s a
o n o m
10R10 O N N y, J 6 %
u V u V u V u V u V u V w w w 2 0 0 a a 1511
Cal-Aurum Industries, Inc. 1-111089 413.14(c), x x x . . x
California Gasket and Rubber Corporation 1-521832 428.66(a) •
Cartel Electronics 1-521814 433.17(a)
Catalina Cylinders,A Div. of APP 1-031021 467.46
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cd Video, Inc. 1-511076 433.17(a) • x
Central Powder Coating 1-021189 433.17(a) • • x
Cherry Aerospace 1-511381 433.17(a),
Chromadora, Inc. 1-511414 433.17(a)
Circuit Technology, Inc. 1-521821 433.17(a) x
Cirtech, Inc. 1-021133 433.17(a) x . . x
City of Huntington Beach (Willow Lane) 5-600545 403.5(d)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
City of Huntington Beach Fire Department 1-111015 403.5(d)
Coast to Coast Circuits, Inc. 1-111129 433.17(a)
Coastline Metal Finishing 1-531436 433.17(a)
Columbine Associates 1-521784 403.5(d)
Continuous Coating Corporation 1-021290 433.17(a),
County of Orange OC Waste&Recycling 1-141003 403.5(d)
Page 4 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
v —
a
m �
c v w a
O O c C E m m c 0 uoo o �' s
C = y v� v, N C rl N - W p C
W N q x N
Permit m C C .. o
No. m
Facility Name Regulation c on ;9 °- u a s x A M
w
w 3 a o Z M w c
^' E 2 m y c
N N N d
C O O o N H £ Y V
LL W m a E o 0 0 0 3 0 o n 9 ° F a °- o. a m LZ z
w m m � = u a a 3 H m m > > w n LL m
o n o m w o � m . c G j v a a 3 `5 a v `w
10R10 O N N C V 3 L 3 L
u V u V u V u V u V u V w w w 2 0 0 a a a ,n O
Crest Coating, Inc. 1-021289 433.17(a) x x x x x x
Custom Enamelers, Inc. 1-021297 433.17(a) • x
Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc. Z-600005 433.17(a)
DAH Oil, LLC 1-581173 403.5(d)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Data Aire, Inc.rig 1-021379 433.17(a)
Data Electronic services, Inc. 1-011142 433.17(a) x x x
Data Solder, Inc. 1-521761 433.17(a)
DCOR, LLC 1-111013 403.5(d)
Dr. Smoothie Enterprises- DBA Bevolutio 1-600131 403.5(d)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DRS Sensors&Targeting Systems, Inc. 1-531405 469.18(a) x . x
Ducommun Aerostructures, Inc. 1-021105 433.17(a)
Dunham Metal Processing 1-021325 433.17(a)
E&B Natural Resources-Angus Petroleum 1-600254 403.5(d)
EFT Fast Quality service, Inc. 1-011064 433.17(a)
Electro Metal Finishing Corporation 1-021158 433.17(a)
Electrolurgy, Inc. 1-071162 433.17(a)
Electron Plating III, Inc. 1-021336 433.17(a)
Page 5 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
v —
a
m �
c v w a
O O c C E m m c 0 uoo o �' s
C = y v� vi N C rl N - W p C
W N q Z N
Permit m C C .. o
No. m
Facility Name Regulation on ;9 °- u a s x
w
w 3 a o Z M w c
^' E 2 m y
N N N d
C O O o N H £ Y V
jr W m a E o 0 0 0 ; p o n c ° F m °. a v m u z
u a a 3 H m m > > w n LL m
co n ° m w o - . j v a a 3 `5
10R10 O N N C V 3 L 2 = O 3 L
Q V Q V u V u V U V u V w w w 2 2 2 2 0 0 a a o. ,n O
Electronic Precision Specialties, Inc. 1-021337 433.17(a) x x • x x • x
Embee Processing(Anodize) 1-600456 413.14(c), x x x x x
Embee Processing(Plate) 1-600457 413.14(c).
Fabrication Concepts Corporation 1-011068 433.17(a)
Fineline Circuits&Technology, Inc. 1-021121 433.17(a) x x x
FMH Aerospace Corp DBA FMH Corporati 1-571331 433.17(a) x
G&M Oil Company, Inc.-Station#50 5-053293 403.5(d)
Gallade Chemical, Inc. 1-011257 403.5(d)
Gemini Industries, Inc. 1-071172 415.24, x x
Gemtech Coatings 1-600149 433.17(a) x
General Container Corporation 1-031042 403.5(d)
GKN Aerospace Transparency Systems 1-531401 403.5(d)
Gothard Street, LLC 1-581177 403.5(d) x
Green Clean Water&Waste services 1-521857 437.47(b)
Harbor Truck Bodies, Inc. 1-021286 433.17(a)
Hartwell Corporation 1-021381 403.5(d)
Hi Tech Solder 1-521790 433.17(a) x x x x x
Page 6 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
v —
a
m �
c v w a
C E m m c
c O O 0 uoo o �' s
C = y v� vi N C rl N - W p C
W N y y q x N
Permit m c c .. o
No. m
Facility Name Regulation on ;9 °- u a s x
w
w 3 a o Z z w c
^' E 2 m y
N N N d
C O O o N H £ Y V
LL W m a E o 0 0 0 3 0 o n 9 4 F m °_ a v m LL z
u a a 3 H m m > > w n LL m
o n .c°— v v o o'u '" c 2 j la X `w
10R10 O N N C V 3 L x = O 3 L
u V u V u V u V U V u V w w w x 2 2 2 0 o c, a u ,n O
Hightower Plating& Manufacturing Co. 1-021185 433.17(a) x x x x x x x x x x
Hixson Metal Finishing 1-061115 413.14(c), x x x x x x x x x x
Ideal Anodizing, Inc. 1-021041 433.17(a)
Ikon Powder Coating, Inc. 1-521756 433.17(a)
Image Technology, Inc. 1-521755 417.86 • x
Imperial Plating 1-031106 433.17(a) x x x x x
Independent Forge Company 1-021401 467.45
Industrial Metal Finishing, Inc. 1-521828 403.5(d)
Intec Products, Inc. 1-021399 403.5(d)
Integral Aerospace, LLC 1-600243 433.17(a) x x x x x x
International Paper 1-531419 403.5(d)
International Paper#3 1-031171 403.5(d)
International Paper Company 1-521820 403.5(d)
Irvine Sensors Corporation 1-171328 469.18(a)
1& R Metal Finishing Co. 1-521823 403.5(d)
J&J MARINE AQUISITIONS, LLCdl-571292
1-551152 403.5(d)
Jazz Semiconductor 469.18(a) x x
Page 7 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
v —
a
m �
c v w a
O O c C E m m c 0 uoo o �' s
C = y v� vi N C rl N - W p C
W N q Z N
Permit No. m C C .. o
x m
Facility Name Regulation c on ;9 °- u a s A M
w
w 3 a o Z M w c
^' E 2 m y c
N N N d
C O O o N H £ Y V
LL W m a G o 0 0 0 3 0 o a c o F a a u z
w m m m � = ° a w 3 H
o n o m w o m v v
10T10 O N N C
Q V Q V u V (.1 V U V Q V W W W S 0 0. 4 1 In O
JD Processing, Inc. 1-511407 433.17(a) x x x x x
Jellco Container, Inc. 1-021402 403.5(d) x
John A.Thomas- Bolsa Oil 1-031065 403.5(d) • x
Kinsbursky Brothers Supply, Inc. 1-021424 403.5(d)
Kirkhill TA Company(North) 1-021426 428.76(a)
. x .
Kirkhill TA Company(South) 1-021052 428.76(a) • x
x x x
Kraft Heinz Company 1-071056 403.5(d)
Kryler Corporation 1-021428 413.14(b).
La Habra Bakery 1-031029 403.5(d)
Lightning Diversion Systems LLC 1-600338 433.17(a) x x x
Llnco Industries, Inc. 1-021253 403.5(d)
Linn Energy 1-521808 403.5(d)
LM Chrome Corporation 1-511361 433.17(a)
Log!Graphics, Inc. 1-031049 433.17(a)
LSW Enterprises, LLC 1-521863 403.5(d)
M.S. Bellows 1-113007 433.17(a)
Magnetic Metals Corporation 1-531391 433.17(a) x x x
Page 8 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
v —
a
m �
c v w a
O O c C E m m c 0 uoo o �' s
C = y v� vi N C rl N - v a C
W N q Z N
Permit m C C .. o
No. m
Facility Name Regulation on ;9 a u a s x A M
w
w 3 a o Z M w r- c
^' E 2 m
N N N d
C O O o N H £ Y V
LL W m a E o 0 0 0 ; p o n c ° F m °_ a v m u z
w m ? m m M I as a
o n o m w o m
10R10 O N N C
Q V Q V u V u, V U V Q V W W W S D 0 a a 1 In O
Manufactured Packaging Products 1-521793 403.5(d) x
Manufactured Packaging Products(MPP F 1-021681 403.5(d) • x x
Markland Manufacturing, Inc. 1-011046 433.17(a) • x
Maruchan, Inc. (Deere) 1-071024 403.5(d)
Maruchan, Inc. (Laguna Cyn) 1-141015 403.5(d)
Master Wash, Inc. 1-511399 403.5(d) x
. .
MCP Foods, Inc. 1-021029 403.5(d)
Meggitt, Inc. 1-600006 433.17(a)
. x .
Merical, Inc. 1-521840 439.47 x x x
Micrometals, Inc. 1-021153 433.17(a) x
Murrietta Circuits 1-521811 433.17(a)
Neutronic Stamping and Plating 1-521772 433.17(a)
Nobel Biocare USA, LLC 1-521801 433.17(a) x
Nor-Cal Beverage Co., Inc. (Main) 1-021284 403.5(d)
Nor-Cal Beverage Co., Inc. (NCB) 1-021283 403.5(d)
Omni Metal Finishing, Inc. 1-021520 433.17(a)
Orange County Plating Co., Inc. 1-021535 433.17(a) to. x
Page 9 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
v —
a
m �
c v w a
O O c C E m m c 0 uoo o �' s
C = y v� vi N C rl N - W p C
W N q Z N
Permit m C C .. o
No. m
Facility Name Regulation c on ;9 °- u a s x A M
w
w 3 a o Z M w c
^' E 2 m y c
N N N d
C O O o N H £ Y V
LL W m a E o 0 0 0 3 0 o n 9 4 F m °_ a v m LL z
w m ? m m � I as a a 3 H
o n o m w o m v
10R10 O N N C V 3 L 2 = O 3 L
Q V Q V u V u V u V Q V w w w 2
Pacific Image Technology, Inc. 1-021070 433.17(a)
Pacific Western Container 1-511371 403.5(d) • . x
Parker Hannifin Corporation 1-141002 433.17(a)
Patio and Door Outlet, Inc. 1-521783 433.17(a)
Patriot Wastewater, LLC(Freedom CWT) 1-521861 437.47(b)
Patriot Wastewater, LLC(Freedom Non-CV 1-600147 403.5(d) x
Patriot Wastewater, LLC(Miraloma CWT) 1-600009 437.47(b)
Patriot Wastewater, LLC(Miraloma Non-C 1-600013 403.5(d)
Pepsi-Cola Bottling Group 1-031295 403.5(d)
Performance Powder, Inc. 1-521805 433.17(a)
Pioneer Circuits, Inc. 1-011262 433.17(a)
Platinum Surface Coating, Inc. 1-521852 433.17(a)
Power Distribution, Inc. 1-511400 403.5(d)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Powerdrive Oil&Gas Company, LLC(16th) 1-600246 403.5(d) • x
Powerdrive Oil&Gas Company, LLC(Sury 1-600245 403.5(d)
Precious Metals Plating Co., Inc. 1-011265 433.17(a)
Precision Anodizing& Plating, Inc. 1-521809 433.17(a) x
Page 10 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
v —
a
m �
c v w a
O O c C E m m c 0 uoo o �' s
C = y v� vi N C rl N - W p C
W N q Z N
Permit m C C .. o
No. m
Facility Name Regulation on ;9 °- u a s x A M
w
w 3 0- o Z M w c
^' E 2 m y c
N N N d
C O O o N H £ Y V
LL W m a O o 0 0 0 3 0 o n 9 ° F a °- o. a m LL z
w m m � = u a a 3 H m m > > w n LL m
o n o v v o o'u . c 2 t j X a a 3 `m
10R10 o N N C V 3 L 2 = O 3 L
Q V Q V u V u V U V Q V w w w 2 0 0
Precision Circuits West, Inc. 1-011008 433.17(a) x x x x x x x
Precision Resource,California Division 1-111002 403.5(d) x x
Precon, Inc. 1-021581 403.5(d)
Primatex Industries, Inc. 1-031036 403.5(d)
Quality Aluminum Forge, LLC(Cypress Nor 1-521833 467.45
Quality Aluminum Forge, LLC(Cypress Sou 1-600272 467.46 x x x x. .
Railmakers, Inc. 1-061138 433.17(a)
RBCTransport Dynamics Corp. 1-011013 433.17(a)
Reid Metal Finishing 1-511376 433.17(a) x x x x x . [ . x x x
Remora Operating CA, LLC 1-581192 403.5(d) x x x
Republic Waste Services 1-521827 403.5(d)
Republic Waste Services of So. Cal., LLC 1-021169 403.5(d)
Rigiflex Technology, Inc. 1-021187 433.17(a) x x
Rolls-Royce HTC 1-600212 403.5(d)
Roto-Die Company, Inc. 1-023033 433.17(a)
Rountree/Wright Enterprises, LLC 1-111028 403.5(d)
5&C Oil Co., Inc. 1-581175 403.5(d) x
Page 11 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
v —
a
m �
c v w a
O O c C E m m c 0 uoo o �' s
C = y v� vi N C rl N - W (1 C
W N q x N
Permit m C C .. o
No. m
Facility Name Regulation on ;9 °- u a s x A M
w
w 3 a o Z M w c
^' E 2 m y c
N N E d
C O O o N H Y V
LL W m a E o 0 0 0 3 0 o n 9 4 F m °_ a v m LL z
w m ? m m M I s a
o n v `a
10R10 o m N J o x V 3 L x = o L
u V u V u V u V u V u V w w w 2 0 0 a a a ,n O
Safran Electronics& Defense,Avionics US 1-571304 433.17(a) x
Sanmina Corporation (Airway) 1-061008 433.17(a) x x x . x x
Sanmina Corporation (Redhill) 1-061009 433.17(a)
Santana Services 1-021016 433.17(a)
Scientific Spray Finishes, Inc. 1-031311 433.17(a)
Semicoa 1-571313 469.18(a) • x
Serrano Water District 1-021137 403.5(d) • t
. .
SFPP, LP 1-021619 403.5(d)
Shepard Bros., Inc. 1-031034 417.166,
Soldermask, Inc. 1-031341 433.17(a) x
South Bay Chrome 1-511383 433.17(a)
South Coast Circuits, Inc. (Bldg 3500 A) 1-013069 433.17(a)
. x .
South Coast Circuits, Inc. (Bldg 3506 A) 1-011030 433.17(a)
South Coast Circuits, Inc. (Bldg 3512 A) 1-511365 433.17(a) x
South Coast Circuits, Inc. (Bldg 3524 A) 1-011054 433.17(a)
South Coast Water 1-511405 403.5(d)
Southern California Edison#1(Mt) 1-031014 403.5(d)
Page 12 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
v —
a
m �
c v w a
O O c C E m m c 0 uoo o �' s
C = y v� vi N C rl N — v a C
W N q x N
Permit m C C .. o
No. m
Facility Name Regulation on ;9 a u a s x A M
w
w 3 a o Z z w c
^' E E m
N N N d
C O O o N H £ Y V
LL W m a E o 0 0 0 3 0 o n 9 ° F a °- o. a m LL z
w m ? m m M I as a
o n o m w o m v `w
10R10 O N N C 3 L
Q V Q V u V u V u V Q V w w w 2 0 0 a a o. ,n O
Southern California Edison rig(Das) 1-031015 403.5(d) x
Southern California Edison#3(Lars) 1-031016 403.5(d) •
Southern California Edison#4(Mss) 1-031020 403.5(d)
SP5 Technologies 1-011310 433.17(a).
Stainless Micro-Polish, Inc. 1-021672 433.17(a) x
Star Powder Coating, Inc. 1-531425 433.17(a)
Statek Corporation(Main) 1-021664 469.26(a)
Statek Corporation(orange Grove) 1-521777 469.28(a)
Stremicks Heritage Foods, LLC 1-021028 403.5(d)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. xxx
Summit Interconnect, Inc. 1-600012 433.17(a) x . x
Summit Interconnect, Inc., Orange Divisio 1-600060 433.17(a)
Superior Plating 1-021090 433.17(a)
Superior Processing 1-021403 433.17(a)
Tayco Engineering, Inc. 1-031012 433.17(a)
Taylor-Dunn Manufacturing Company 1-021123 433.17(a)
TC Cosmotronic, Inc., DBA Cosmotronic 1-571309 433.17(a)
Techplate, Inc. 1-021082 433.17(a)
Page 13 of 15
Orange County Sanitation District
Permittees with Pretreatment Equipment
Fiscal Year 2017-2018
v —
a
v �
c v v v
O O c C E m m c 0 uvo o �' s
C = y v� vi N C rl N - W p C
W N q x N
Permit m C C .. o
No. m
Facility Name Regulation c on ;9 °- u a s x
w
w 3 a o Z M
^' E 2 m y
N N N d
C O O o N H £ Y V
jr W m a E o 0 0 0 3 0 o n 9 4 F m °_ a v m LL z
w m ? u a v 3 m m m w n LL m
c o c E v 5 v o N c � a a N v
o n ° m w 'c c c ou c c 3 �^ 'o O « « `v
A � .q o m N v o x V J L x = o J L
Q V u V u V u V U V Q V w w w x 2 2 2 0 0 a a u ,n O
Thermal-Vac Technology, Inc. 1-021282 433.17(a)
Timken Bearing Inspection, Inc. 1-531415 403.5(d)
Tiodize Company, Inc. 1-111132 433.17(a)
Toyota Racing Development 1-071059 403.5(d)
. . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transline Technology, Inc. 1-021202 433.17(a) r
Triumph Processing-Embee Div(Plate) 1-511403 413.14(c),
Triumph Processing-Embee Div. (Anodize 1-511402 413.14(c).
Tropitone Furniture Co., Inc. 1-141163 433.17(a)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TTM Technologies North America, LLC. (Cr 1-511366 433.17(a)
TTM Technologies North America, LLC. (H 1-511359 433.17(a) x x x
Ultra-Pure Metal Finishing, Inc. 1-021703 433.17(a)
United Pharma, LLC 1-531418 403.5(d)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Universal Alloy Corp. 1-021706 467.35(c)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Universal Molding Co. 1-521836 433.17(a) • x
Veeco Electro Fab, Inc. 1-021166 433.17(a)
Vi-Cal Metals, Inc. 1-521846 403.5(d)
Weber Precision Graphics 1-011354 403.5(d)
Page 14 of 15
3 J
O O p
3 � �
- a
3 w j
a ti O a
a
a z
'u a
o �
n
r r r
v
N W N Z �
r r o 3 D
v o w ao
W W N ti
ut ut LD � O
W W M SU
W W W C rD 3
N
Anion Exchange y T O
C
• Carbon Filtration .3r
Cation Exchange y 'Ln
Chelate Breaking Tank N v
Chemical Precipitation 0 a) .3—r
Chromium Reduction V 3 .Or
. Clarification O
IClarification eop F+ •* 3
Clarification neop
wt
• Coagulation/Flocculation ^
Cross Flow Filter(Memtek)
Cyanide Destructl Stage m
Cyanide Destruct 2 Stage .3+
Effluent pH Adjustment
Electrowinning/Plateout
Equalization tank
Holding Tank
• Mixed-Bed Ion Exchange
Multi-Purpose Tank
• Multi-Purpose Tank
O/W Sep
• Other Pressure Filtration Device
pH Adjust Tank-No Heavy Metals
• 1 Plate& Frame Filter Press
Polishing Filter
w Sludge Thickening Tank
Other
v,
0
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
714.962.2411
w .ocsd.conn
1w201e