Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 97-33-1 ` i RESOLUTION NO. 97-33-1 INITIATING PROPOSAL TO CONSOLIDATE DISTRICTS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 APPLYING TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 56000, ET Ste• ------------ WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts were originally formed and organized in 1947-48 as separate districts providing sewer services, generally following the drainage patterns of Orange County; and, WHEREAS, Orange County's sewer system is now well-established, and the current main focus of the nine districts is on joint projects and the attendant regulatory issues; and, WHEREAS, over the years, the continuation of the nine districts as separate entities has contributed to certain administrative and financial burdens; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Part 3 of Division 3 of Title 5 of the Government Code, known as the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 ("the Act"), certain local agencies may make request to the Local Agency Formation Commission for a change of organization or a reorganization; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 1 is a local agency authorized to make such a proposal; and, t WHEREAS, "consolidation" is one type of change of organization or ' reorganization permitted by the Act, defined as the uniting or joining of two or more districts, formed pursuant to the same principal act, into a single new successor district; and, WHEREAS, notice of intent to adopt this resolution of application has not been given to each interested and each subject agency as is permitted, but not required by Government Code Section 56800(b); and, WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be consolidated is inhabited; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of streamlining administration and Board procedures, maintaining financial and other records, and reducing costs, it has been determined by the District that the proposed consolidation will effect substantial administrative benefits and financial savings, both individually and collectively. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: This proposal for a change of organization is made pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 2: The change of organization proposed herein is the consolidation of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 into a single County Sanitation District, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. r Section 3: The boundaries of the affected nine districts are as depicted in Exhibit "A", attached. The boundaries of the proposed consolidated district are as depicted in Exhibit "B", attached. Section 4: Terms and conditions of the proposed consolidation regarding consolidation of assets and financial obligations are set forth on Exhibit "C", attached. Section 5: The number and method of selection of members of the governing Board shall be as provided in California Government Code Section 4730.65. Section 6: The following person is to be furnished with copies of the report by the Executive Officer and to be given mailed notice of the hearing on the proposal: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Section 7: This proposal is to be considered a formal request that proceedings for consolidation be taken pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 8: A plan for providing services within the affected territory is attached as Exhibit "D". Section 9: The effective date of the consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 24, 1997. \Vead\data2\wp.dta\admin\B S\R ES\R ES97\97-33-1.doc r STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, PENNY KYLE, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97-33-1 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board on the 24th day of September, 1997, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Pat McGuigan, Chair; James M. Ferryman, Thomas R. Saltarelli NOES: William G. Steiner; ABSENT: Mark A. Murphy IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, this 24th day of September, 1997. Penny Kyle, cr�t ry Board of Di torlf County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California Nead\data2\wp.dta�admin\BS\FORMS\97\F13.033.1.doc EXHIBIT A— Map of Current Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 3, wNIrnER BwD Q9 If+ LA HABRA qti n 9 41 LAMBERT AD IMPERIAL"WV B EA Q�'b OASTANGNURY RD L Ki'ON MOAB'`L1NDA BLVO 13 MALVERN YOR BA CHA►MAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA ORAI ETMO AVE 2 /�C �5 � e I Q �., LA UENA PALM ARK 5 EI ANAHEIIM a VILLA O �� BAURD CYPRE S I TA AVE PARK LOS LAMITOS W STANTON y RANGE < m W W > Y a CNAIMAN AVQ Z LAW, • GARDEN l� GRO S S TE TMINSTE I I wvsrwNSR�vB tTT11 sT B � o u < 1 TUS MC Piz _ SANT 11 ANA WARNER AVE W 8 FQUNTA r t a S AVE IALLEY HUN IN N ADAMS AVI 0 PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE �r 5 NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 I EXHIBIT B —Map of Proposed Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 3, wNlrneR Ewo 0,9 9��, 9 LA HABRA LAMEERT RO �9 IMPERIAL H W NENuM EA 6ASTA FQ rpREA UNOA ELVD _ L ON YORBA MAWCRN CHA►MAN AVG LACENTIA LINDA oRAI ET1N7 AVE �UE A ` o �y PA K 1 C? ALMNCflW AV P A U ANAHEIM WVILLA 40 a� BALL FW I CYPRESS I W TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON ; LAMITOS m RAN E Ic I Y e CHAPMAN AV9 2 y�A GARDEN � GRO STMI'IS S A wESTMINSTER 6E 1TTN ST B s TUS MCI EN Sr gSANT F' W o ANA WARNER AVE 8 FOUNTA 2` i E♦usAVEVALLEY a ,� HUN IN 4N J o EAC IAOAMS AVIG 9 .PACIFIC AMILTCNAVE COs..r OCEAN MESA IRVINE $ pb �r ' NEWPORT BEACH N a.0 a Y.AA SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Exhibit C LAFCO Application Terms & Conditions Consolidation of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1. The nine separate districts known jointly as the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ("CSDOC") shall be consolidated into one single county sanitation district pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code Sections 4730 et seq.) and shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County ("District"). [G.C. §56844(v)] (As used herein, "CSDOC" refers to the nine Districts, both jointly, singly and in any combination.) 2. As a result of consolidating, the nine existing districts shall be dissolved and be reorganized as one consolidated District with one consolidated Board of Directors under California Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. At the time of consolidation, the Board of Directors would include representatives from the following jurisdictions: [G.C. §56844(n)] • County (1) - County of Orange Unincorporated Area • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Santa Ana Buena Park La Habra Seal Beach Cypress La Palma Stanton Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Tustin Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District 3. Directors of District shall be compensated in accordance with applicable state law. Pagel t 4. All system facilities shall be transferred from existing CSDOC to District as of the effective date of consolidation in an "as-is" condition, without any payment or repair obligation from CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(k)(v)] 5. All lands, buildings, real and personal property, assets and appurtenances held by CSDOC, as of the effective date of the consolidation, shall be transferred to District. Such assets are enumerated in the CSDOC Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ending June 30, 1997. [G.G. §56844(b)] 6. District shall be designated as the successor to CSDOC and retain all of the rights, duties and obligations of the former CSDOC with respect to enforcement, performance or payment of any outstanding bonds, contracts or obligations of the former CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(m)] 7. All previously authorized charges, fees assessments and/or taxes currently in effect by CSDOC shall be continued by District. [G.C. §56844(t)] 8. The establishment of Special Zones within District, pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 4850 et seq., shall be effected on July 1, 1998 and shall collectively include any or all portions of the entire CSDOC service area and individually include the specified areas as shown on the nine attached maps. The existing rate schedules within each of the Special Zones shall continue as presently in effect by each District within CSDOC until such time as amended by the District's Board of Directors. The annual sewer service charge can only be amended by a vote of two-thirds of all members of the governing body. [G.C. §56844(e)] 9. All agreements by and between any two or more existing CSDOC's, including but not limited to: joint sewer ownership or use, construction or maintenance of facilities, shall be terminated upon the effective date of the consolidation. The termination of the agreements is appropriate in recognition of the new District assuming full and exclusive ownership and authority over all rights, duties and obligations of all existing CSDOC's. 10. To the extent not inconsistent with the terms of the consolidation, and as necessary to carry out the original intent, all contracts between the Irvine Ranch Water District and one or more existing CSDOC's, including those relating to ownership of capacity rights in treatment, disposal and sewer facilities, shall be assigned to District and remain in full force and effect. All contracts between County Sanitation District No. 14 and one or more Page 2 CSDOC's shall also be assigned to the new District and remain in full force and effect. 11. CSDOC shall transfer any and all indebtedness and the obligation to levy taxes, charges, assessments, or fees in order to make payment of said indebtedness to District. [G.C. §56844(c)] 12. CSDOC shall file a statement with LAFCO that the reorganization shall not adversely affect or impair the status of any employee of CSDOC or District. As of the effective date of this reorganization, all employees of CSDOC shall become employees of District. Rates of pay, accrued vacation and sick leave, vacation and sick leave accrual rates, employee rights, insurance, retirement benefits, and all other benefits and programs shall be transferred over to District at then-current levels. Memoranda of Understanding in place under CSDOC shall be transferred to the new District. [G.C. §56844(1)] 13. Permits issued to CSDOC by any federal, state or local regulatory authority, shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties as contained within the permits and to continue operations without interruption. Such permits shall include but not be limited to: CSDOC's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit, including a waiver for full secondary treatment pursuant to Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act, and all other air and land permits. [G.C. §56844(v)] 14. Permits issued by CSDOC shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties contained in said permits and in the laws authorizing the issuance of said permits. Such permits shall include but not be limited to Sewer Connection Permits and Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permits. [G.C. §56844(c)] 15. District shall assume all existing contracts and obligations presently in full force and effect with CSDOC and which have not otherwise been specifically referenced herein. [G.C. §56844(m)] 16. The effective date of this consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. [G.C. §56844(p)] Page 3 Map of Special Zone 1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY s, WNITTIER BLVD Qn Aq-�enLt LA HABRA LAMBERT RD Cc 9 IMPERIAL HWY CQGA.O/�O wA B6ASTAMURT EA YORBA LINDA BLVD O MALVERN L ON YORBA 13 CHA►MAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� � 9s J�1 ORA ETNO AVE 2 Q PALM UN PIA K .COBALL Ro CY RE S i ANAHEIM o VILLA O PARK LOS W � STANTON TA AVE� RAN E a LAMITOS R S � m CNA►MAN AVE Y W 3 �S� GARD N o GRO STMI S SE wESTMINmR VE C 4 W , us J 8 F UNTA + E S AVE ALLEY HUN INGT N ADAMSAVI 9 PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA ��° IRVINE O g. ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, wNIrneR BLVO LA HABRA Oq�� eF9 LAMBERT RD C`-C,rg9oAA�- IMPERIAL NNlV V OG ,•rO c 8 EA: BAa ;.. YORBA La°w eLV6 L MALVERNx. ;ON - YORBA 13 cNA►MAM AVE LIN©A 9�`� LACENTIA ORA ETNO AVE I `:i : Q �1 �G UE A O PALM �N PA OK i a g ANAHEIM m �O BALL RO CY RE S I ve PARK 4 LOS STANTON LAMITOS z :::::::. :.... > ::RAN` E`<>'< 3 »:>:>a .. ... o W z r g STMI S SE WESTMINSIER VE 1TTH 6T e s 7 4 W u < O TUS � Me R N aT 11 g SANT W m ANA WARNER AVE J 8 F UNTA : 1 E LISAVE ALLEY HUN NGTGN EAQJ ADAMSAVq9 9 O PACIFIC LTON AVE COST OCEAN M IRVINE P 4' 5 �~ NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS y ° °c.0 a rw OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 r Map of Special Zone 3 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S vwilmsnreLvo ; '4 : .LA:HABRA LAMOMrrF* "WVEAtAL tiirY CO(/ "V B EA SASTA NURY : YORSA UNDA SLVO wLVERN, L ON YORBA 13 CNAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9%� f 9 J�� oriA error Ave � 2 cP�� GO UE A I OO .. LA �c�`O PALM u PA K 6j �::::::::::>'AIYAHEIM: W o f O VILLA rp ..........T...E..�.}.. pp TA AVE PARK _m5;.iiiiiitiiii EAWT.O..: RAN E �y :<;•:Y ii:�ac�%.`!i:2;:�,ifMit►NAtt1CV6�i':; > x m GAR EN As GRO $TISIII S. . wEsrMn{Sl S elt vs> 1 rrn Sr E 7 B a .....' .. i Y x a�r u 1 O TUS MCC F DEN Sr 11 SANT O W ANA WARNER AVE O 8 UN o` Nt. PO cFh P HUN NGT cq PACIF Maui iiv `::2' o y 0 OCEAN AMILTON AVE COST O MESA ,� IRVINE ONEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �onaarw OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 f Map of Special Zone 5 LOS ANGELES COUNTY WNITTIERBVD LA HABRA d w• 6 LAMBERT RD q�-rC(CCq-r�gO/ IMPERIAL HWY B EA BASTA HURT L ON TORBA LINDA BLVO MALVERN YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA OJ`1� ORA ETNO AVE I 2 CO LA UE A O PALMA LI PA K g ANAHEIM o VILLA 1p �O BALLRo CY RE S TA VE PARK LOS ; STANTON 3 wALAMITOS w O RAN E 5 > Y e CNAPMAN AV 9 i m GAR D N GRO STMI S WENSTER�VE 'M Sr 9 STLB s 7 W D O TUS � m = MC F N ST g SANT 4 W m ANA WARNER AVE J , 8J F UNTA r E S AVE ALLEY HUN ING N AI)AMSAV8 O PACIFIC COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 6 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, WNIrnER BLVD LA HABRA d 9gti�1e`c9AA-- LAMSERT RD IMPERIAL HWV COGS O'�OC B// EA BASTANENURY RD YORBA LINDA BLVD L ON MALVERN YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� � 9s GOJ�1 ORA ETMWZAVE I 2 'Q�O 45 U E A �., LA K PALM uN PA g ANAHEIM ; VILLA dD �O BALL RD CY RE S I T VE PARK LOS STANTON 3 LAMITOS C R O s AN E > Y o CNAPMAN AVE S w o ��`�� GARDEN GRO STMI S S WESrMNSTER VE 1TYN ST B W ` O TUS m e > MC F N Sr ti 11 g SANT W s ANA WARNER AVE i 8 F UNT s i E LISAVE ALLEY HUN IN N Jrg iN�c�MfF9O 6F ' ADAMS AVE 66 gr PACIFIC AMILTON AVE OCEAN COST. . _:... IRVINE O5 �~ ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 7 LOS ANGELES COUNTY s A- WNIrnER BLVD qr LA HABRA LP Oq�� 6Fq� LAMBERT RD IMPERIAL NwV B EA c0(�'I'Q�OQ BASTAN MU L VORSA LINOA BLVD ON MALVERN YORBA 13 CNA/MAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'G� � 9s, �JOJ� ORA ETIO AVE ( 2 �y V UE A LA Co PALM u L K N 5 ANAHEIM I VILLA O BALL RD CYPRESS 1 Am TA VE PARK LOS STANTON LAMITOS k e O S RANGE WO <¢t tl 5 > Y m CNA►MAN AVE S y tl yWl ARD ° r G N GRO STMI S t >?. SE WESTMINSTER VE I7TN ST 9 w 7 , tl tl MC F 4EN ST �'9j. g SANT Z. tl ANA WARNER AVE S AVEALLEY W 1 E i r N F C R HUN NG N ADAMS A GJ ON 9r O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA a1'° WP IRVINE Q, QW O5 , NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' Cora a rw OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 11 LOS ANGELES COUNTY s A- wnrnER BLVD LA HABRA LAMBERT RO IMPERIAL HWV VVVV �+QG�O,�QC B EA BASTAN NURV L ON YORBA UNDA BLVD MAWERN YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA OJ� ORA ETiO AVE I A CCj UE A !. �., LA LN AV A PALM u P K g ANAHEIM a VILLA dD BALL RD CY RE S I TA E PARK LOS V LAMITOS STANTON 3 > = O RAN E em m 3 F W O ¢ m J 3 > Y m CNAPMAN AV6 2 a o �a GARD9N GRO STMI S SE WESTIHSTER VE Sr1TT, 9 � 7 W .3 ' a TUS MC F DDEN Sr �'9j• SANT ;::< ;.:::: m ANA WARNER AVE O .. F UNTA 1 .�..,EIII USAVE ALLEY �tiF e c P° Ftir T• UN: NO.:::: N ADAMS A 4J Gq gT O PACIFIC +!iinNvr: COST OCEAN MESA �° IRVINE O5 g` ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 13 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 3, '14, WNITTIER BLVD LA e HABRA �9'4•Gn `c9 LAMBERT AD IMPERIAL HWV �O B EA f} coG,l,�1- BASTA NURY L ON wRBA LINOA BLVD > 13 <>< MA AN YORBA ,p CNAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA ;;.2F A OMIT ETNO VE 11O O 2 G I 5 UE A LA ~� PAF K C� PALMA uw=LN Av Og ANAHEIM a VILLA O ' >:; <»:»; SALLRD CY RE S I PARK TA AVE LOS STANTON g LAMITOS k O 8 RAN E W > Y e CNAPMAN AVEI S y o A GARDEN GRO STMI S SE WESTMINSTER kvE ITTN ST a g u O MC F DEN Sr TUS �{ 11 g SANT W m ANA WARNER AVE 8 F UNTA o 1 E US AVE ALLEY 4J,PP iq�,C�Nf��O'9 4' r HUN IN N ADAMSAVEy O PACIFIC AWLTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA o IRVINE 5 'P NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS MiMd W W1A. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 f Map of Special Zone 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, ,• WNITTER BLVD On Aq�-ren,1' LA HABRA LAMBERT RD vCC^ �•' IMPERIAL H W V B EA cOGww- BASTAN NURY YORBA LINDA BLVD O MALVERN L ON YORBA 13 CHAPIAAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9s ORAI ETNO AVE j 2 /�C LA U ER A O Co PALMA U PAYEIK Og I v� ANAHEIM VILLA dO aD CYPRESS i W TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON 0 RAN E b LAMITOS s R W k O I S J 6 > Y CNAPMAN AV8 2 uWi W r GARD N � GRO STMI STE S WESTMINSTERI VE 1TTN ST s 0 W 7 s > u 1 b b O us �::':::•�!:����•:}�'�}���h:•:;:�' O MC F DDEN 5T :. : ::>:;;:::::.::;:.: 11 ; o SANT 14 < <>:>::>:... O m ANA WARNERAVE 00, i r 8 FU NTA a EiUS AVE VALLEY e EACH ADA MS A c:o O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE OCEAN COST MESA e P 1 ?� P OrP~ ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Exhibit D Plan of Services for the Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County L• INTRODUCTION This Plan of Services has been prepared pursuant to Government Code Section 56653, which requires that a plan for providing services within the affected territory be provided whenever an application for a change of organization is submitted to LAFCO. This document will facilitate the consolidation of the nine (9) existing County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) into one single County Sanitation District pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq. The resulting consolidated agency shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County (District). This consolidation proposes a transfer of all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of CSDOC to the District. The Plan of Services provides a description of CSDOC and its operations and how they will be consolidated as the District. IL DESCRIPTION OF CSDOC A. General Information The CSDOC is made up of nine independent special districts. Each district is a political subdivision of the State of California and is governed by a representative of each city and sanitary district within the district and, if the District includes unincorporated territory, a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Each district has its own budget. All districts except District Nos. 13 and 14 have their own tax rate and trunk sewer systems. District No. 13 buys capacity in the other districts' transmission facilities. A Joint Administrative Organization was formed in 1948 to administer the business of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities and the activities common to all districts. This is provided for in a Joint Ownership Operation and Construction Agreement. The day-to-day operation of the organization is under the direction of a General Manager, one assistant general manager, eight department heads, for an authorized staff of 560 full time equivalents for the Fiscal Year 1997-98. B. Types of Services, Level, and Range of Service Currently Provided The CSDOC is a single-purpose public entity formed solely for the collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater and its residuals and serves the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal needs of approximately 2.2 million people. During 1996-1997, an average daily sewage influent flow of 244 million gallons per day (MGD) was treated and 510 wet tons per day of residual solids (biosolids) was produced. CSDOC encompasses a 470 square-mile area of Orange County that includes 23 of the County's 31 cities. CSDOC operates the third largest wastewater management agency of its kind west of the Mississippi, with assets valued at more than $1 billion dollars. The nine individual districts own about 650 miles of major trunk sewers, 22 pumping stations and two major treatment plants with disposal facilities to safely discharge the treated effluent through an ocean outfall into deep ocean waters. The treatment plants process an average of 244 million gallons of wastewater per day. Page 1 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley. It has a current operational primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 108 MGD and a secondary treatment capacity of 66 MGD.currently being expanded to 80 MGD. Treatment Plant No. 2 is in Huntington Beach. It has a primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 186 MGD. Plant No. 2 provides advanced primary treatment to all of the wastewater that enters the plant and secondary treatment to up to 90 MGD of the total flow. Table 1 highlights the service area characteristics and system features. Table 1 Service Area Joint Works Facilities -As of June 30, 1997 Total Population Served (estimated) 2,275,000 Service Area (estimated) 470 square miles Total Number of Cities Served 23 Total Miles of Trunk Sewers 650 Number of Pumping Stations 22 Number of Treatment Plants 2 Primary Treatment Capacity (includes standby) Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 Total Primary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 MGD Secondary Treatment Capacity Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 Total Secondary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . 156 MGD Total Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450 MGD Reported Average Daily Flow Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 MGD Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 MGD Total Average Daily Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 MGD Page 2 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service C. Description of Sanitary Sewer System CSDOC processes wastewater from the collection systems of the various cities, water districts and local sewer agencies. They do not deal directly with individual customers except for portions of District No. 7, which is located primarily in unincorporated territory of the County near Tustin. CSDOC's assets consist of individual district assets and each district's respective share of jointly owned assets. Table 2 summarizes the respective District ownership in jointly owned and separately owned property, plant, equipment and construction in progress, at cost, as of June 30, 1997: Table 2 District Ownership Jointly Owned Separately Owned Total Total property, plant and equipment $804,200,000 $321,300,000 $1,135,500,000 Less accumulated $310,200.000 depreciation Net property, plant and equipment $825,300,000 D. Additional Assets In addition to its real property and facilities, CSDOC owns service vehicles, equipment, tools, repair parts inventory, and communications and office equipment. CSDOC maintains cash, liquid securities to meet its cash flow requirements, and other reserves. The following table summarizes the districts' reserves budgeted for the end of Fiscal Year 1996-97. Table 3 Reserves Analysis "Dry Period" Operating Cash Flow $28,021,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,221,000 Debt Service Reserves Fund Balance 59,724,000 Capital Reserves 49,233,000 Environmental Requirements Reserves 4,484,000 Flood/Earthquake Insurance Reserves 81,450,000 Rate Stabilization Funds 141,200,000 Total $375,333,000 Page 3 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service E. Liabilities As of June 30, 1997, CSDOC liabilities included debt in the amount of approximately $397,575,000. These issues include $397,45,000 of Certificates of Participation (COP) and $30,000 of general obligation (G.O.) bonds. The Districts have maintained their AA- rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and Aa rating from Moody's Investor Services, although all COP issues are backed by issuance of letters of credit and are rated AAA. The Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget provides for$32,620,000 to service the debt on the various COPs issued. In addition, there is a $15,000 annual payment to maturity in January 1999 for the G.O. bonds in District No. 1 1. Consolidation of the districts will have no impact on the liabilities of CSDOC. Under consolidation into a single County Sanitation District, the new County Sanitation District assessments all predecessor district obligations. Further, the districts are presently joined by agreement to manage and fund liabilities. The new consolidated District will establish special zones upon consolidation to continue differential user fees and to ensure that predecessor districts' outstanding debt is serviced by only those residents who originally assumed that debt. The boundaries of each zone will be the same as those of each predecessor district. The new consolidated District will establish nine (9) zones to differentiate and account for costs, revenues and liabilities of the existing districts. In addition, an Improvement District (ID) could be formed coincident with each predecessor district's service area to enable proper segregated accounting for the retirement of the existing Certificates of Participation (COPs) debt. As new future borrowing may occur, new ID's would be formed to include the service area benefiting from the projects. Such new ID's would not necessarily have boundaries congruent with the zones. For projects at the treatment plants, however, an ID to include all of the new District's service area could be formed to properly allocate the cost of such improvements that would benefit all the zones. It is also expected that the consolidated District would continue the practice of dedicating Ad Valorem Taxes where it would be collectable within a zone to the retirement of long-term debt of an appropriate ID. F. Management and Employees CSDOC presently operates in a consolidated fashion pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code Section 4840 et seq. CSDOC currently employs approximately 560 full-time employees. Legal Services are provided by the law firm of Woodruff, Spradlin and Smart auditing services are also provided by contract. In addition, various other services are contracted-out. These include such varied services as groundskeeping, environmental review, ocean research and reporting, etc. CSDOC's organization chart is included in CSDOC's Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget which is submitted along with this application. The existing net joint operation budget for Fiscal Year 1997-98 is $46,922,650. Consolidation of the districts into a single District would result in the continuation of management and operational structures and functional expenditures similar to those described above. Operations of the new District would remain the same as the current operations of CSDOC. Consequently, there would be no change in employee compensation and employee benefits as adjustments would not be required. The transition from the existing joint operation to a single District operation would have no impact on employees, their occupational status, or their benefits. Page 4 J CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service G. Rates and Charges Each district, except District No. 14, has an adopted Sanitary Sewer Service Fee to provide funding for operating the sewer systems in accordance with the Clean Water Act and CSDOC's Revenue Program. District No. 14 is funded through the payment of an annual charge by the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) directly to CSDOC. IRWD levies and collects individual user charges from each parcel receiving service. Sanitary Sewer Service Fees are set annually by each district after a review of projected needs. In May, 1997, The Board of Directors adopted a user rate increase fee schedule that provides for gradual rate increase over the next five years for six of the nine districts. This represents that first user rate increase in seven years. The Districts have been able to avoid user fee increases by reducing operational costs through reorganizing and streamlining Districts operations, holding vacant positions open, and deferring new facilities. However, because the Districts' capital improvement program's debt service obligations continued to increase beyond the level of its primary funding source, i.e. property tax revenues, and because of the additional capital improvement requirements, increase in user fees became inevitable. The following is the adopted Annual Sewer Service Fee Rate Schedule District 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 1 $91.36 $100.27 $110.04 $120.77 $132.55 2 $73.00 $75.00 $77.00 $80.00 $82.00 3 $75.00 $76.00 $77.00 $78.00 $80.00 5 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 6 $78.00 $80.00 $82.00 $84.00 $86.00 7 $55.00 $60.00 $66.00 $73.00 $80.00 11 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 $101.25 $113.91 13 1 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 As was indicated previously, establishment of special zones upon consolidation would continue the existing schedules of differential Sanitary Sewer Service Fees until such time as amended by action of the governing body. Said fees shall not be amended without a two- thirds vote of all members of the governing body. Consolidation is expected to facilitate reorganizing and streamlining the new District's operations. H. Summary of Revenues and Expenses The CSDOC Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget, which is included in this application package, contains detailed information regarding revenues and expenses. Attention is called to Section 3, pages 1-13, of the Budget document for summary information. )II DESCRIPTION OF THE CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT A. General Page 5 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service The nine independent County Sanitation Districts currently collectively known as CSDOC, and which utilize joint operating, working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, will be consolidated into a single County Sanitation District pursuant to the California County Sanitation District Act(Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq.). The boundaries of the consolidated District will be the same as the outer boundaries of those nine predecessor districts. B. Types of Services, Level and Range of Services The new District will assume all duties, responsibilities'and liabilities of the former CSDOC. The District will own and operate the wastewater treatment system which provides sewage collection, treatment and disposal services currently owned and operated by the nine (9) Sanitation Districts known jointly as CSDOC. C. District Structure The District' s organization will be the same as that structure which presently exists under the CSDOC joint operating agreement for the operation and administration of the joint facilities. D. Governing Board Composition The new District will be formed under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65. Under Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65, the governing body of the consolidated District would be made up of a 25-member board representing local cities, sanitary districts and the County of Orange unincorporated area. Board membership would decrease from 29 to 25 with the loss of double representation for the Cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Yorba Linda and the County of Orange. The proposed governing Board formed under Section 4730.65 would include the following agencies: • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Tustin Buena Park La Habra Santa Ana Cypress La Palma Seal Beach Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Stanton Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District I • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District • County (1) -County of Orange (to represent the Unincorporated Areas) Page 6 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service E. Three Year Budget of the Consolidated District It is anticipated that revenues and expenditures which would have been budgeted by CSDOC for the operation and administration of joint facilities and the construction of capital improvements will be the basis for the new District's financial plan. Attachment A is a 3-year projection of the District's budget under consolidation. The projection covers Fiscal Years 1998-99, 1999-2000 and 2000-2001. Attachment B is a summary of anticipated capital improvements for the new District. This summary of capital needs was derived from CSDOC's Joint Works Capital Improvements Budget. IV IMPACTS ON CUSTOMERS There will be no negative financial impact on customers. No rate changes are anticipated as a result of the consolidation. Please refer to previous discussion regarding the formation of special zones. V. IMPACTS ON OTHER JURISDICTIONS There will be no service level impacts on any of the cities, sanitary districts, and other agencies presently relying on services provided by CSDOC as the services responsibilities, without modification, will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Effective date is proposed as July 1, 1998. IMPACTS ON REGIONAL PARTICIPATION All CSDOC's contractual obligations will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Accordingly, there are no anticipated impacts. Page 7 9/5/97 i Consolidated Sanitation Distrct of Orange County Proiected Budoets Fiscal Years 1998-99 Thru 2000-01 991 8-1999 999-2000 2000-2001 Revenues Industrial/Commercial Use Fees $ 9,317,000 $ 10,714,000 $ 12,322,000 Sewer Service Fees 65,938,000 68,907,000 72,436,000 Fees From Other Agencies 6,150,000 4,700,000 5,250,000 Connection Fees 6,784,000 8,065,000 9,727,000 Interest 22,443,000 22,420,000 21,749,000 Miscellaneous &Other 2,640,500 4,141,500 4,141,500 Property Taxes 30,572,000 30,565,000 30,562,000 New COP Issues 53,200,000 67,000,000 62,400,000 Total Revenues $ 197,044,500 $ 206,512,500 $ 218,587,500 Requirements Collection System O&M Expenses $ 9,553,000 $ 10,804,000 $ 10,527,000 Treatment System O&M Expenses 47,861,000 48,818,000 49,794,000 Collection System Improvements 20,997,000 24,902,000 26,497,000 Treatment System Improvements 70,086,000 78,429,500 96,380,500 GO Bond Principal &Interest 16,000 16,000 - Costs of New COP Issuance 2,660,000 2,850,000 3,120,000 COP Service&Retirement 37,772,000 42,590,000 47,834,000 Total Expenses $ 188,945,000 $ 208,409,500 $ 234,152,500 Revenue Exceeding Expenses $ 8,099,500 $ (1,897,000) $ (15,565,000) Beginning Cash Balances 385,031,450 393,130,950 391,233,950 Ending Cash Balances $ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,668.950 Appropriations. Dedications & Reserves "Dry Period" Operating Cash Flow $ 28,800,000 $ 30,121,000 $ 30,737,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,483,000 11,925,000 12,064,000 Capital Projects Completion 49,995,000 49,946,200 49,540,100 Environmental Requirements Reserve 4,634,000 4,484,000 4,484,000 Required Debt&COP Service Reserves 38,359,000 41,133,000 44,230,000 "Dry Period"COP Service Cash Flow 27,705,350 31,244,600 35,022,350 Property&Uability Catastrophe Reserve 89,752,850 90,971,850 91,208,250 Rate Stabilization Funds 142,401,750 131,408,300 108,383,250 •$ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,668,950 Unappropriated Cash & Investment Balances $ - $ - $ - County Sanitation District No. 1 Schedule of Dbwet Collection Syd m Prol" CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1097-98 /008-90 /090-20m 2000-01 200m YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIREL ua IABILITY 1.Mlacelaneo Pro)eds 250.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 23.000 25,000 125,000 125.000 250.000 'SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMEWSIRELIABILITY 250.000 .00 250 25,0f10 25.000 25.000 00 25.0 125.000 125.000 250.000 REHABILITATION PROJECT 1.Santa Ana Tnn*Sewer Rehab.11) e.300,000 75.000 73.000 e.225.000 0.300.000 2.Sunflower Manhole Rehab.(1)7-21•(30%) 140.000 30,000 80.000 30.000 140.000 140.000 3.Dyer Road Manhole Rehab.(1) 350.000 50.000 200.000 100,000 350.000 350.000 4.Mob-Dyw Manhole Rehab.(1) Q2310.00WO 80.000 100,000 150.000 200.000 350.000 8.OreenvgsShcvan M-dmk RMab.11) 80.000 100.000 150,000 8010m 200.000 e.RdN 8L Mairala Rehab.(1) 230.000 230.000 SUBTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 75.000 30,000 130.000 330.000 300.000 065.000 e.70S.000 7.570.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 100.000 55,000 155,000 355,000 1 325.000 090,000 e.8m.000 T.e20,000 • PMlely ftn ded by Obb1d No.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 2 Schedule of Dlsh ct Collection System Projeith CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST RED EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEAR TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-08 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOt COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACITY 1.Replace Euclid Relief Tnmk Sewer,P.110 Edtnper(t) 6,750,000 6,750,000 6,750,000 2.Replecemerd d tVewArope Placantle Tnnk 2-3R(2) 8,500,000 250,000 3,000,000 3,250,000 3,250,000 8.500.000 3.Replacement d Cypress Ave.SutrMk, 24R(2) 8,750,000 250,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 500,000 5,750,000 5,750,000 4.Tell Interceptor Sewer,2.8-3(1) 1,800.000 1,800,000 1,11W.000 5.BatavlakAwmin Tnmk Rdd(1) 325.000 325,000 325,000 S.Bolsa Sewer ReOd(1) 460.000 480.000 460.000 7.Santa Me River lntr(S.A.R.1.)Read,2-31'(1) 13,414,000 64.000 350.000 2.000,000 5,000,000 8,000,000 12.350,000 1.000,000 13.350.000 8.Carbon Canyon Dam Tnmk Sewer 3 P.S.Ab&OL(2) 1.775.000 175.000 1,500.000 100.000 1,775,000 1.775.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSMCREASE CAP. 36,771,000 64,000 175.000 2.100,000 4.100,000 8.250.000 8.500.000 23.125.000 13.585.000 38,710,000 CAPITAL RAPROVEMENTSIRELM 1.Abendonmerd d Yorbe Unda Pimp Station (2) 200.000 50.000 50.000 150.000 200,000 2.Santa Ana River brtr Manhole t1 Access.2-WSR2'(t) 5.052,000 452,000 200.000 200,000 2.000.000 2,000,000 200.000 4,600,000 4,600.000 3.91 Freeway Widening Projects.2.7A" 105,000 92.000 13.000 13.000 13,000 4.1-5 Freeway VVldanN Project,2-35 '• 109,000 15,000 50.000 44,000 94.000 94,000 S.1-5 Freeway VVldentrq Project.2-3A " 24,000 4.000 20.000 20.000 20,000 8.Santa Ana River brtr Shut OR Gate Replacena 325,000 75,000 250,000 325.000 325,000 7.Pump Station Irtprovemenb,2-37•(10%) 398.700 3,700 60.000 60.000 140,000 135.000 395.000 395,000 6.MISMO nexus Projects 600,000 100.000 1006000 100,000 100,000 100.000 500,000 1110,000 GWAW SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILIfY 6.813.700 566.700 518.0001 654,000 1 2,240.000 2,235,000 350,000 5.997.0001 250.000 6.247.000 REHABILITATION PROACTS 1.Euclid Tnmk Manhole Rehab.2-34R 952.000H768,7W 70.000 730,000 30.000 830,000 830.000 2.South Santa Ana Rim Tank Easement,2.39 16,000 SUBTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 968,000 70.000 730,000 30,000 830.000 830.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 44,5S5,700 763,000 3,484,000 6.370.000 10.465.000 6,650,000 I 29,95$000 13.835.000 43,787.000 • partially Mated by Outer Districts ••Costs to be n*nbrrsed by Caftans 1.MASTER4nANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION 2.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN 3 CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 3 Schedule of District Collection System Projects. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F 0 N 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REO EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-95 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 200142 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEME SANCREAS CAPACRY 1.Artesia stand Subtnnk Refer(3) 400,000 50,000 300.000 50.000 400,0110 4W.OW 2.Weslside Relief Interceptor Parallel(3) 5,700,000 5,700,000 5,700,000 3.Wdslside Relief Tnnk(3) 700,000 700,000 WOOD 4.Oraips-Westem SL"nw*Relief Sewer,3-25(2) 1.207.000 57,000 100.000 1.000.000 50,000 1.150,000 1,150,000 S.Knoll INT Relief,Orangethorpe to Mesh(3) 3.300.000 100,000 1,500,000 1.500,000 3,1W.000 2W.000 3,300,000 S.Hoover-Western Subtnnk Relief on Trask(3) 1,050.000 50.000 500,000 500,000 1,050,000 1,050,000 7,Miller-Holder.Artesia to Hillsborough,3-38-1(2) 5.335,000 65,000 150.000 3.000.000 2,000.000 120.000 5,270.OW 5.270.000 B.Mllw-H der knprov.. knporl d Hwy.,3-38-312) 3,330.000 230,000 2,000,000 1.000.000 100.000 3,100.000 3.100.OW 9.Los Alamilos Srbt w*Relief(3) 5.000.000 5.000,000 5,000,000 10.Magnobs Relish Swr,Wstmin.•Trask 3.35R-1(1) 2.3W,000 3W.000 1,800,000 200.000 .Z000.000 2,000.000 11.Slater Ave.Pump Station Rao..11-17.1(11.112.1%) 1.238.000 1.220.000 10.0001 10,000 10.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAP. 29.560.000 1,880,000 3,960,000 4,2W.000 2,404000 3,120,000 2,100,000 15,050,000 11,e0Q000 27,880,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELI_ABILITY 1.Te"o,Pipe Cohn,3.36•• 2,112,000 2,012,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 2. 1-5 Freeway Widenhq,3-37••'• 43.000 13,000 20,000 10,000 30,000 30,000 3.Reloc Portion of Los A wnk0s SuMrJn ,3-5-1 65.000 50.000 15.000 15.000 15,000 4.Pump Station Improvements,2.37•••(141A) 558.200 5.200 84,000 54,000 196,000 189,000 553,000 553,000 S.MiscellaneousProjects I 1.000.000 1W.000 100.000 100.000 100,0001 100,000 600,000 500,000 1.000,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.BAPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 1 3.778.200 1 2.080.2001 319.0001 194.0001 296.0001 289.0001 100,000 I 1,198.000 I 500,000 I 1,698,000 REHABILITATION PROJECT 1.Nkiwb Strad Tnnk Prrdt Rehab•(57.8%) (4) A4.3016.00WO - M000 500.000 2.Magnolia Tnnk Sewer Rahab,3-35R 12► 908,000 750,000 1,500,000 550.000 2.800.000 2,600,000 3.Seel Beafi Blvd.Rehab..3-11R 38,000 20.000 40.000 60,000 60,000 SUBTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 946,000 770.000 1.540.000 550.000 2,5BQ000 500,000 1 3,360,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 31.644.200 4,906.200 1 5,019,000 1 5.934.000 3,246,000 3,709,000 1 2200,000 1 20,135,000 12,600,000 1 32,738.000 • PertWy Rrded by District No.11 1.MASTER44MNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY TINDER CONSTRUCTION »ClaWAppsd Pend 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN «•Partially funded by Other DlsMde 3 MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION ""Subject to raimbursemerd by CALTRANS 4.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN 5 CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 5 Schedule of Dlstllct Collectlon System Projects, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REQ EST REG EST REO EST REQ FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997.98 1998.99 1999.2000 2000-01 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSnNCREASE C�ACQY 1.W.Coasl H Gravity Tnnk Rehab,S37-3(20%)•(1) 819.000 599.000 wy 20,000 20.000 20.000 F&TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAP. 819,000 599.000 20.0W 20,000 20.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABIU 1.NewpeA 81vd.d PCH Widening.541•(42%) 2W.000 20.000 180.000 20.000 180.000 180.000 2.Reloeetlon of Lido Pump Station.5-01.1'•' 895.000 25.000 225.000 575,000 70.000 870,000 870.000 3.Pump Slatien Improvements.2-37-(28%) 1.118.400 10./00 1811.0w 168.000 392.0W We.000 1.108.000 1.10e.0w 4.Mlscelanamn Pioleds I35 AM /25.ow 25.0001 25.000 1 25.0001 25.OW 225,000 1 125.000 1 350.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 1 2.561.400 55.400 e78.000 788.0001 487.0001 /03.WD 1 25,0001 2.381.0001 125,000 1 2.508.000 REHABILITATION PROJECT 1.Big Canyon Tntnk Rehabilitation(2) 2.000.000 50.000 900.000 1.000.000 50.000 2.OW.000 2.0110.000 2.Balm Pau aft Rehab 500,000 sworn 500.000 SUBTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 2,500.000 50.000 900,000 1,000.000 50.000 2A00,o00 500,000 2.500.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 5,680, W 6654.400 698,000 e38.000 1 1.387.000 1.403.000 75.000 4.101.0W e25,000 5,028,000 •Partially AsdW by District No.8 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION '•Paritaly Mded by Offm Dlstrids 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION •-•Costs pagely shared with CRY d Nw4xW Beach County Sanitation District No. 6 1111110111111111 Schedule of District Collection System Protects CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F 0 H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST REG EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1987.90 1998.09 1OW2000 2000-01 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 20W-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSOINCREASE 1.W.Coad Hwy Graft Trunk Retrab.5.37-3(80%)•(1) 2.476.000 2,398,000 80,000 80,000 80.000 2.Fakvbw ReW Baker SI. o Mikan Sl.,6.12(2) 3,445.000 380.000 1,000,000 1.700,000 365,000 3.OtI5,000 3,065,000 3.District 6 Tnx*Parald(3) 1,325.000 25.000 3W.000 1,000,000 1.325.0W 1.325.000 4.Dover Drive Tnsir Parallel(3) 1.5W,000 100,000 1.000.000 /00.000 1.500.000 1.500.0W 5.Cdlege Ave.P.S.ParNd F.M.(5%)"(2) 74,0W 1.500 7.500 65.000 72.5m 72.5W SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 8.820.000 2.777.5W 87.5W 1,085,000 1,825.0W 1.805.000 1,4W.OW 6,042,5W 6.042.500 CAPITAL 1.Newport Blvd.6 PCH WdeNng.5r41(58%) 277.0W 28.000 221.000 28.000 249,000 249.000 2.Wilson Ave I CalBonis Sheet Sawn►.6.13(2) 1.080.000 35.000 110,000 915.000 1.025.0W 1.025.000 3.Wderirr8 o1(-4115 8ru Costa Mesa 100,000 100.000 100.000 4.Mlsoelanea»Pm(acts 250.000 25,000 2500 25,0W 25.000 25.000 125.0m 125,0W 250,000 S.Punp Station knpmvernenls.2.37"6%) 239.200 2.2W 38,0W 36,000 I 64,000 I 61,000 1 237.000 1 237.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTS0RELIABILITY 1.926.2W 65.200 392.000 1.004.0W 109.0001 106.0001 25.000 1.636.0W 225.000 1.801,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 10,748,200 2,842,7W 479.500 2,069,000 1,934.000 1.T71.000 1.425,000 7,678.600 225.0W 7.903500 • Pwo*ended by Distria No.5 " Partially funded by District No.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION Pere&y funded by Other Districts 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 3.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 7 Schedule of DbMct Collecdon System PToj"_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F 0 H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST RED EST RED FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997.98 1998-09 1999-2000 200"1 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEINEWSPINCRFASE 1.Orange Perk Acres Tnnk Replacement,7-17(2) 821.000 37,000 50.000 800,000 134,000 784,000 754.000 2.Tusfin Air Base Facilities (3) 5.750,0D0 150,000 2,000.000 3,000,000 800.000 100.000 5.750.000 5.750.000 3.1"Tnu*Repleamet (3) 2,850.000 50,000 1.400.000 1.000,000 2.450.000 200,000 2.850.000 4. GIslar-Red 1i!Intereepta(3) 5.300.000 300,000 300.000 5.000.000 5,300,000 S.Red Hill Interceptor Parotid(3) 1.400,000 1,400,000 1.400.000 8.Lemon Helptis Sewer Reptscome i, 1-22-1l2(3) 5.414.000 1,854.000 550,000 2.000,000 2,550,000 1,000.000 3,550.000 7.Browning Tnmk Reptacmerd(3) 850.000 650.000 950.000 B.Cdlege Ave PS Parallel Fame Matn,7-23.1(9S%)-(2) 1.405,000 27,000 /43,000 1.235,000 1,3T8.000 1.378,000 9.Improvements to Main SL P.S.,7-7-1(28%)-(2) 9871000 217,000 650.000 100.000 750.000 750,000 Ia.Main St.Pimp Station Espanslon.1.7-2(29%)•(7) 775.000 775,000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 25,332,000 2.145,000 993,000 3.935.000 3,484,000 2.450.000 3.100.000 13.982.000 8.450.000 22.412.000 77 AW 1.Pump Station bnprovemerds.2.37 (33%)----M 1,315,200 100 2.2 190.000 108.000 182,000 445.000 1.303,000 1.303.000 2.Pump m Station Abandonment.7-14-3 (3) 425.000 75.000 200,00(1 150,000 425.000 425.000 3.Misceianeaa Projects 500.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 50,000 501000 250,000 230,000 500,000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 2.240,200 12.200 248,000 323,000 712,001) 845.000 50,000 1,OT8,000 250,000 2.228.000 __ON PROJECTS 1.Surdlower Mw*wb Raub.7.21 (70%)--M 308.000 1.000 70.000 185.000 50.000 305000 305.000 2.Miscairre"Repair of Local Sewers (4) 5,800.000 100.000 1.200.000 1.200,000 1.200,000 11.211111,000 4.900.000 700,000 5.800.000 SUB-TOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 5,908.000 1.000 100,000 1.270,000 1,385.000 1.250.000 1.200.000 5.205000 T00000 5,905,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 33,478.200 1 2,169,200 1,341,000 1 5.528,0m 5,581.000 4.345.000 4,360,000 I 21,145,000 SAWA00 30,545,000 775A00 • Pwt y howled by District No.14 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION '•Pareally krnded by District No.1 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN ••'Partially knded by putrid No.8 3.MASTER-PlA 44ED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION «»pargagy Nnded by Dow"Swu 4.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN 8 CONSTRUCTION J County Sanitation District No. 11 Schedule of Dletrlct Collection System Pivi". CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C 0 E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS OUDGET EST REO EST REO EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997.98 1998.99 1999.2000 200"1 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS/INCREASE CAPACITY 1.SisterAve.Pump Station Repl.,11-17-i(1)•(87.5%) 6.520.000 6,450,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 2.GoIdenwed SL Sewer Replaeernent 11-17-2 11) 2.720.000 43,000 135.000 500,000 2.000.000 50.000 2,685.000 2.895.000 3.Sister Ave.Relief(2) 1.700.000 1.700.000 1.700.000 4.Hd Intenxpim(2) 3.150,000 150.000 8.000.000 3.150.000 3.150.000 5.Slster/S~aleRepleosara (2) 800.000 000.000 100.000 8.Warner Ave Sewer Relef(2) 1.500.000 1,500.000 1 1.800.000 SU&TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 18.400,000 6.495,000 205.000 500.000 2,000.000 2W.000 3.000.000 6.905,000 1,000,000 e.t10S,000 (CAPITAL IMPRMMENTSIRELIMUI 1.Huntiroan Beady Purchase Abend.11-10(2) 325,000 75.000 250.000 325.000 325.OW 2.Pump Station kr fmvem w b,2-W(9%)"m 350.300 3.200 54.000 54,000 128.000 121.000 355.OW 355.000 3.IA$codaneous Projects 800.000 150.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 350.000 250.000 N NIA00 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELUIBIUTY 1.283,300 3.300 279.000 354,000 176.000 171,000 50.000 1.030.000 250,000 1.280.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 17.683.300 6.496.300 494.000 854,000 2.176.000 371.000 3,050,4100 8.835,000 4.250,000 11.185,000 1 J. Partially haled by DbWd No.3 Partially horded by Other DIs1Ads 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 14 Schedule of DlsMt t Collectlon System Projeetst- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REO EST REG EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1907-98 1998.99 1999.2000 200"1 2001412 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAPACITY 1.Imptovaim so Main SI.P.S.,7-7-1(72%)111) 2,120,000 195.000 1.675.000 250,000 1,025.000 1,e25.000 2.Maln Street Pump SIAm Evanston,7.7-2(72%)—M 2,000,000 2,000.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMEW84NMWASE CAP. 4.120.01301 195A00 1 1.675,0001 250.0001 1.025.000 1 1-926.0001 2.000.000 CAPITAL IMPR0VEMENTSIR�UIBILITY 1.M190e11019asP1aleW 250.000 25A00 25.000 25.000 25,000 25.000 125,000 125.000 250A00 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSMELIABEJTY 250.000 25.000 25.000 25,000 25,000 25.000 125,000 125.000 250.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 4,270A00 195A00 1.700,000 275A00 25.0001 25.0001 25,000 2.050.000 125A00 24175.000 2 0M 00 - Posey Raided by ow"N8.7 Future conshuc0on now 2020.pa(My(aadad by 0.7 1.MASTER4nANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION s� gl i RESOLUTION NO. 97-33-2 INITIATING PROPOSAL TO CONSOLIDATE DISTRICTS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 APPLYING TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 56000, ET SEQ. WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts were originally formed and organized in 1947-48 as separate districts providing sewer services, generally following the drainage patterns of Orange County; and, WHEREAS, Orange County's sewer system is now well-established, and the current main focus of the nine districts is on joint projects and the attendant regulatory issues; and, WHEREAS, over the years, the continuation of the nine districts as separate entities has contributed to certain administrative and financial burdens; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Part 3 of Division 3 of Title 5 of the Government Code, known as the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 ("the Act"), certain local agencies may make request to the Local Agency Formation Commission for a change of organization or a reorganization; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 2 is a local agency authorized to make such a proposal; and, t, WHEREAS, "consolidation" is one type of change of organization or reorganization permitted by the Act, defined as the uniting or joining of two or more districts, formed pursuant to the same principal act, into a single new successor district; and, WHEREAS, notice of intent to adopt this resolution of application has not been given to each interested and each subject agency as is permitted, but not required by Government Code Section 56800(b); and, WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be consolidated is inhabited; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of streamlining administration and Board procedures, maintaining financial and other records, and reducing costs, it has been determined by the District that the proposed consolidation will effect substantial administrative benefits and financial savings, both individually and collectively. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: This proposal for a change of organization is made pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 2: The change of organization proposed herein is the consolidation of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 into a single County Sanitation District, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. i t Section 3: The boundaries of the affected nine districts are as depicted in Exhibit "A", attached. The boundaries of the proposed consolidated district are as depicted in Exhibit "B", attached. Section 4: Terms and conditions of the proposed consolidation regarding consolidation of assets and financial obligations are set forth on Exhibit "C", attached. Section 5: The number and method of selection of members of the governing Board shall be as provided in California Government Code Section 4730.65. Section 6: The following person is to be furnished with copies of the report by the Executive Officer and to be given mailed notice of the hearing on the proposal: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Section 7: This proposal is to be considered a formal request that proceedings for consolidation be taken pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 8: A plan for providing services within the affected territory is attached as Exhibit "D". Section 9: The effective date of the consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 24, 1997. H:\wp.dta\admin\BS\RES\RES97\97-33-2.doc STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) v )SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, PENNY KYLE, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97-33-2 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board on the 24th day of September, 1997, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Norman Z. Eckenrode, Chair; Steve Anderson; John Collins; Barry Denes; Pat McGuigan; Chris Norby; Mark Schwing; Bob Zemel NOES: Mark Leyes; William G. Steiner; ABSENT: Burnie Dunlap; Mark A. Murphy IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, this 24th day of September, 1997. Penny Kyl a tary , Board of Di ect s of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County',California . H:\wp.dtMad... \BS\F0RMS%7\F13.0332.doc r• � � EXHIBIT A— Map of Current Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY s, wNIrnER Bwo O9 q�'eF LA HABRA LAMBERT Ro IMPERIAL HWY V B EA oL�� BASTANENURY RD VORBA LINDA BLVD O MALVEAH L ON YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'r� J� I OPA ESNO AVE I 2 G LA UENA I co R'R}v f PALM UNCOLLIN AAVQ 5 ANAHEIM w VILLA dO BALLRo CYPRE S I TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON 3 LAMITOS k O I $ RAN E W > a CNAPMAN AVE 2 N GARDEN GRO STMIlSTE S I wesrwNSTER(AVE 77T1/ST B W 7 OTUS MCP OeN ST 11 9 g SANT = o ANA WARNER Ave W J 8 FQUNTA r 1 EkU3AVeyVALLEY HUN IN N aq ADAMS A G O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA r��'° a IRVINE s � O5 g~r ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SRVM-CLR.COR CS00C 1195 EXHIBIT B —Map of Proposed Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY wNlrneR ELVD '4� B LA HABRAnF9w- LAMBERT SO IMPERIAL HWY B EA BA STA MURY RO L ON YORSA UNOA BLVO MAWERN YORBA CNAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9s ORAI ETNO AVE I 'Q GGJ L �O PALMA N�WA ANAHEIM 5 a VILLA r0 �O eAU.FOI CYPRESS I TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON 3 LAMITOS > _ RAN E W> m CNAPMAN AV8 I GARDEN GRO STMI�S S WESTMINSTER LIVE 'M Sr B V < TUS , F MC FADOEN Sr g SANT W m ANA WARNER AVE I d 8 F UNTA o 1 El US AVE ALLEY HUNTING N J C ROAMS AVAI .PACIFIC AMILTON"0 COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE '41 1r ' NEWPORT BEACH N n • _ •0/aA W•W SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 V Exhibit C LAFCO Application Terms & Conditions Consolidation of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1. The nine separate districts known jointly as the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ("CSDOC") shall be consolidated into one single county sanitation district pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code Sections 4730 et seq.) and shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County ("District"). [G.C. §56844(v)] (As used herein, "CSDOC" refers to the nine Districts, both jointly, singly and in any combination.) 2. As a result of consolidating, the nine existing districts shall be dissolved and be reorganized as one consolidated District with one consolidated Board of Directors under California Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. At the time of consolidation, the Board of Directors would include representatives from the following jurisdictions: [G.C. §56844(n)] • County (1) - County of Orange Unincorporated Area • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Santa Ana Buena Park La Habra Seal Beach Cypress La Palma Stanton Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Tustin Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District 3. Directors of District shall be compensated in accordance with applicable state law. Pagel 4. All system facilities shall be transferred from existing CSDOC to District as of the effective date of consolidation in an "as-is" condition, without any payment or repair obligation from CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(k)(v)] 5. All lands, buildings, real and personal property, assets and appurtenances held by CSDOC, as of the effective date of the consolidation, shall be transferred to District. Such assets are enumerated in the CSDOC Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ending June 30, 1997. [G.C. §56844(b)] 6. District shall be designated as the successor to CSDOC and retain all of the rights, duties and obligations of the former CSDOC with respect to enforcement, performance or payment of any outstanding bonds, contracts or obligations of the former CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(m)] 7. All previously authorized charges, fees assessments and/or taxes currently in effect by CSDOC shall be continued by District. [G.C. §56844(t)] 8. The establishment of Special Zones within District, pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 4850 et seq., shall be effected on July 1, 1998 and shall collectively include any or all portions of the entire CSDOC service area and individually include the specified areas as shown on the nine attached maps. The existing rate schedules within each of the Special Zones shall continue as presently in effect by each District within CSDOC until such time as amended by the District's Board of Directors. The annual sewer service charge can only be amended by a vote of two-thirds of all members of the governing body. [G.C. §56844(e)] 9. All agreements by and between any two or more existing CSDOC's, including but not limited to: joint sewer ownership or use, construction or maintenance of facilities, shall be terminated upon the effective date of the consolidation. The termination of the agreements is appropriate in recognition of the new District assuming full and exclusive ownership and authority over all rights, duties and obligations of all existing CSDOC's. 10. To the extent not inconsistent with the terms of the consolidation, and as necessary to carry out the original intent, all contracts between the Irvine Ranch Water District and one or more existing CSDOC's, including those relating to ownership of capacity rights in treatment, disposal and sewer facilities, shall be assigned to District and remain in full force and effect. All contracts between County Sanitation District No. 14 and one or more Page 2 CSDOC's shall also be assigned to the new District and remain in full force and effect. 11. CSDOC shall transfer any and all indebtedness and the obligation to levy taxes, charges, assessments, or fees in order to make payment of said indebtedness to District. [G.C. §56844(c)] 12. CSDOC shall file a statement with LAFCO that the reorganization shall not adversely affect or impair the status of any employee of CSDOC or District. As of the effective date of this reorganization, all employees of CSDOC shall become employees of District. Rates of pay, accrued vacation and sick leave, vacation and sick leave accrual rates, employee rights, insurance, retirement benefits, and all other benefits and programs shall be transferred over to District at then-current levels. Memoranda of Understanding in place under CSDOC shall be transferred to the new District. [G.C. §56844(1)] 13. Permits issued to CSDOC by any federal, state or local regulatory authority, shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties as contained within the permits and to continue operations without interruption. Such permits shall include but not be limited to: CSDOC's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit, including a waiver for full secondary treatment pursuant to Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act, and all other air and land permits. [G.C. §56844(v)] 14. Permits issued by CSDOC shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties contained in said permits and in the laws authorizing the issuance of said permits. Such permits shall include but not be limited to Sewer Connection Permits and Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permits. [G.C. §56844(c)] 15. District shall assume all existing contracts and obligations presently in full force and effect with CSDOC and which have not otherwise been specifically referenced herein. [G.C. §56844(m)] 16. The effective date of this consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. [G.C. §56844(p)] Page 3 Map of Special Zone 1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY WNIrnER BLVD On q-re� LA HABRA R"Yi1 9tiq LAMBERT RD V� IMPERIAL HWY CO(�ti O/UGC B EA BASTA HURY YORBA LINDA BLVD O MALVERN L ON YORBA 13 CNAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA �y 9s 2' ORA ETNOWtfE AVE I 2 OJ ��`�� LATUE A PALM K ANAHEIMVILLA 40 W Qy BALL RD CY RE S i O TA AVE PARK LOS W STANTON m LAMITOS51 RAN E W O S Y b CNAPMAN AV S y GAR D N o STMI S SE WESTM..IER VE 8 <� W u TUS WMINER:9LVE:: J F UNTA r E B AYE ALLEY ° HUNTING FIN ADAMS AVE 4 9 O PACIFIC AMILTONAVG COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE O5 g' ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ---------------- WNITTIER BLVD '9� LA HABRA d LAMBERT AD IMPERIAL NWr CO(iAA--O/�O 'Y c 0 Gti sAa L ON t'DRBALa+Q+BLVO MALVERN YOR6A, 13 GNAPMAN AVE LACENTIA UNDA 92� ORA ETNO AVE G ' O 45 U E A O LA PA K a::>::>::>::.;::.. PALM V U LN A 5 A NAHEI M «. VI L ... ... ....... BALL RD CY RE S I LOS STANTmLAMITO, N :.. :>:::::>:::<:: W < :::.J.::.'.i:::iii > _ <::: ::>::::: :< :RAN.{,, 3 t O W b te 2 H > Y b CNAPMAN AVJ ':i:.S:::.::.;:.>:�>::.>:. < J b p, V STMI S SE WESTMINSTER VE 17T16T B U m 7 o < O TUS J b S Me F DDEN sT 11 g SANT W m ANA WARNER AVE J , 8 F UNTA c 1 E US AVE ALLEY C HUN NGFIN ��Q �rorFq 4�r ADAMSAVI �'J Cq yr O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA �°° �e IRVINE O5 g~ ' NEW ORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �GN2OI YItL� OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 3 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, MNi1TTIER BlVD i� 14, LA HABRA :: �d Oq9� 6Fq� LAMBERT RD` C�Q '9q0 iivvERUL„wY OG �'LO B EA BASTAN NURY �. YORBA LINDA BLVD N 3 1 MA e Y R A O L ERN<''<2i' iiii?%� O CNAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA OJT oPA enw Ave 2 v �co`` PALIsb LN LPNAAVEK . ..E 5 ANAHE[M;> o VILLA dO AVE PARK LQS STANTON 3 LAMfTO Ir m s" RAN E :. ::.�>;:yY::Y::::;>:_•:>�.:CHAEMAft'iSVi`i`" x m ' SE `'' ;: :::wesrM„sseR vt::: ,TTN sr B 7 Y s u 1 O T US MC F DDEN ST SANT 11 � ANA WARNER AVE a 8 F LENT', LL e° °F HUN ING O PACIFIC AMILTONAVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE t aaP �e ONEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 5 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 3, WNITTIER SLVO 9� LA HAB RA LAMBERT RD IMPERIAL HWY v �G �•YO B EAcOG��I- BASTA BURY L ON YCRBA LINDA BLVO MALVERN YORBA �3 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA /O Lr OJ� OM ETNO AVE A �G UE A ` oO LA A K PALM I L LN AV P 0� 9ALLRo CY RE SANAHEIM a VILLA rC TA VE PARK LOS STANTON g N LAMITOS O RAN E p O 3 > Y o CNAPMAN AVE S y GARD N g GRO STMI S SE WESTMINSTERAve "I.ST C 8 < x W S ) e TUS F z MC F N ST o SANT g W m ANA WARNER AVE 8 F UNTA c � E SAVE IALLEY FC HUN ING N �� rFa Q 0 ADAMS A O PACIFIC COST ::;:>:>•. OCEAN MESA IRVINE TEWP�RT;;' BEACH:::: N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS y ° OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 6 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, wHIrnER BLVD �1' LA HABRA LAMBERT RO �1n IMPERIAL HWY B EA cOGti�- BASTA HUM RD VORBA LINDA BWD MALVERN L ON YORBA 13 C HAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� � 9 GOJ�1 ORA ETHO AVE I L A �5 U E 4A ., LA Q' PALM UN PA K 5 ANAHEIM ; VILLA rD BALL RD CY P RE S TA AVE PARK LOS ; STANTON 3 LAMITOS O RANG E g m m 5 > CHAPMAN AV S y o GAR D N a GRO sTMI s S WESTMINSTER VE 1TTH ST T 8 Y m O TUS MC F DOEN Sr gSANT W m ANA WARNER AVE J 8 F UNTA s 1 rl US AVE IALLEY HUN IN N o �Q ti'Fgoq �' ADAMS A ��++ 0r v PACIFIC AAtlLTON AVE `:: OCEAN COST.. <>: « IRVINE e e O5 NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS =° OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 7 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S WNITTIER BLVD LA HABRA LAMBERT RD IMPERIAL HWY pp COGS O/HOC' BASTAB NURY EA L ON YORBA LINDA BLVD MAWERN YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA � 9s VOJ� ORA ETNO AVE I 2 'Q�O �4' LA U E A PALM UN pAAVE K 5 ANAHEIM a VILLA O Q BALL RD CYPRESS I TA AVE PARK LOS W STANTON m 0 b LAMITOS RAN E O s m e g W = S s W > Y CNAPMAN AYE � u b 4j Y GARD N o �v GRO STMI S SE11 WESTMINMR VE 17T11 Sf .... � MC F OEN ST � �'9yw SANT �' 14 W m ANA WARNER AVE S AV ALLEY 1 E E , N F c F HUN INGT4N ROAMS A �' g! O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COS 1 OCEAN MESA ,° IRVINE O5 � ' NEWPORT BE N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS "-- �erae or rw OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 11 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, WNIrnER BLVD LA HABRA gtic q q LAMBERT RO IMPERIAL NWV B EA BASTA HURY YORBA LINDA BLVD O MALVERN L ON YORBA �3 CNAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� OJ� OM M AVE I 2 ,Q I C7 LATU APALM V. K og ANAHEIM W VILLA dD BALL RD CY RE S I TA VE PARK LOS STANTON ; LAMITOS k R OJ s RAN F E I' m O I 6 J S > x m CHAPMAN AV 2 a g �a GARD N GRO STMI S SE WESTWNNSTER VE 17TN Si 6 8 u < O� m TUS MC F DEN S7 �'9L 'JY o SANT ANA WARNER AVE MUNTA 1 E. S AVE ALLEY iNFc r `2 ADAMS AVE .. ......Ll O yr O PACIFIC Nw ` COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE O ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS °OAt2 W rw OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 13 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, WHITTER BWD LA HABRA ... F9 ti LAMBERT AD n �9 IMPERIAL HWV `e. �O/�O e B EA BA STAN HURY j� a. "j- L ON YORBA LINDA BLVD e MALVERN YOR A :: ,9 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA OM ETHOWz AVE J 2 C� O C� G I O 5 UE 4A LA PA K PALM U LN AV 5 ANAHEIM Io VILLA O BALL AD CY RE S I TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON ; y LAMITOS 3 RAN G E o O m F W O G 5 > Y o CIIAPMAN AVE 2 y q �A GAR D N GRO STMI S SE WESTMINSTER MVE 1TTN ST g u 7 u O TUS 7t MC F DEN ST oS 1 ; g SANT W m ANA WARNER AVE J 8 F UNTA o � E US AVE VALLEY Is" PQ iyFc��r�9o'9 OT�' HUN IN N ADAMSAVIQg� O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE co OCEAN MESA m' IRVINE QQ' O5 e�,r ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �CNL OI Yl!° OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY WHIrnER BLVD Qn gren LA HABRA 7gti^ `9AA••nn LAMBERT RD vCC •r97 IMPERIAL NWY CO(�ti O/HOC B EA BASTA MUM YORSA LINDA BLVD 13 MALVERN L ON YORBA 13 CNAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� OJ2 ORAN6ETNO AVE 2 �\�'G LA UE A O uM PA E K 5 I ANAHEIM a VILLA 40 10 BALL AD CY RE S I W TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON m RANGE LAMITOS s W o O $ a 1 S > Y a CNAPMAN w i uWi < L a r GARD N � GRO STMI S S WESTMIN"A 1AVE 17TN ST -� 7 O u W u 1 N N us •:�'�"i:^iiii`isv:ii;{:`.:::is:'.:;'.;"::::i:i::�.2::y:jiiii:.ii:� � MCP DEN ST 11 SANT <:>: 1 O m AN A W WARNERAVE J r 8 TFDUNTA� 0 IIL13 AVE LEY 1 E1 ...J .. .......:::.::...,.:......:...:..:............, HUN IN TON ADAMS AVG PAC IFIC AMI LTON AVE OCEAN COST MESA m a e ry P 1 J J 1 Q 5 NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 ` Exhibit D Plan of Services for the Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County !• INTRODUCTION This Plan of Services has been prepared pursuant to Government Code Section 56653, which requires that a plan for providing services within the affected territory be provided whenever an application for a change of organization is submitted to LAFCO. This document will facilitate the consolidation of the nine (9)existing County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) into one single County Sanitation District pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq. The resulting consolidated agency shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County (District). This consolidation proposes a transfer of all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of CSDOC to the District. The Plan of Services provides a description of CSDOC and its operations and how they will be consolidated as the District. II. DESCRIPTION OF CSDOC A. General Information The CSDOC is made up of nine independent special districts. Each district is a political subdivision of the State of California and is governed by a representative of each city and sanitary district within the district and, if the District includes unincorporated territory, a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Each district has its own budget. All districts except District Nos. 13 and 14 have their own tax rate and trunk sewer systems. District No. 13 buys capacity in the other districts' transmission facilities. A Joint Administrative Organization was formed in 1948 to administer the business of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities and the activities common to all districts. This is provided for in a Joint Ownership Operation and Construction Agreement. The day-to-day operation of the organization is under the direction of a General Manager, one assistant general manager, eight department heads, for an authorized staff of 560 full time equivalents for the Fiscal Year 1997-98. B. Types of Services, Level, and Range of Service Currently Provided The CSDOC is a single-purpose public entity formed solely for the collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater and its residuals and serves the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal needs of approximately 2.2 million people. During 1996-1997, an average daily sewage influent flow of 244 million gallons per day (MGD) was treated and 510 wet tons per day of residual solids (biosolids) was produced. CSDOC encompasses a 470 square-mile area of Orange County that includes 23 of the County's 31 cities. CSDOC operates the third largest wastewater management agency of its kind west of the 'Mississippi, with assets valued at more than $1 billion dollars. The nine individual districts own about 650 miles of major trunk sewers, 22 pumping stations and two major treatment plants with disposal facilities to safely discharge the treated effluent through an ocean outfall into deep ocean waters. The treatment plants process an average of 244 million gallons of wastewater per day. Page 1 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley. It has a current operational primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 108 MGD and a secondary treatment capacity of 66 MGD currently being expanded to 80 MGD. Treatment Plant No. 2 is in Huntington Beach. It has a primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 186 MGD. Plant No. 2 provides advanced primary treatment to all of the wastewater that enters the plant and secondary treatment to up to 90 MGD of the total flow. Table 1 highlights the service area characteristics and system features. Table 1 Service Area Joint Works Facilities -As of June 30, 1997 Total Population Served (estimated) 2,275,000 Service Area (estimated) 470 square miles Total Number of Cities Served 23 Total Miles of Trunk Sewers 650 Number of Pumping Stations 22 Number of Treatment Plants 2 Primary Treatment Capacity (includes standby) Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 Total Primary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 MGD Secondary Treatment Capacity Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 Total Secondary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . 156 MGD Total Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450 MGD Reported Average Daily Flow Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 MGD Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 MGD Total Average Daily Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 MGD Page 2 ` CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service C. Description of Sanitary Sewer System CSDOC processes wastewater from the collection systems of the various cities, water districts and local sewer agencies. They do not deal directly with individual customers except for portions of District No. 7, which is located primarily in unincorporated territory of the County near Tustin. CSDOC's assets consist of individual district assets and each district's respective share of jointly owned assets. Table 2 summarizes the respective District ownership in jointly owned and separately owned property, plant, equipment and construction in progress, at cost, as of June 30, 1997: Table 2 District Ownership Jointly Owned Separately Owned Total Total property, plant and equipment $804,200,000 $321,300,000 $1,135,500,000 Less accumulated $310,200.000 depreciation Net property, plant and equipment $825,300,000 D. Additional Assets In addition to its real property and facilities, CSDOC owns service vehicles, equipment, tools, repair parts inventory, and communications and office equipment. CSDOC maintains cash, liquid securities to meet its cash flow requirements, and other reserves. The following table summarizes the districts' reserves budgeted for the end of Fiscal Year 1996-97. Table 3 Reserves Analysis "Dry Period" Operating Cash Flow $28,021,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,221,000 Debt Service Reserves Fund Balance 59,724,000 Capital Reserves 49,233,000 Environmental Requirements Reserves 4,484,000 Flood/Earthquake Insurance Reserves 81,450,000 Rate Stabilization Funds 141,200,000 Total $375,333,000 Page 3 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service E. Liabilities As of June 30, 1997, CSDOC liabilities included debt in the amount of approximately $397,575,000. These issues include $397,45,000 of Certificates of Participation (COP) and $30,000 of general obligation (G.O.) bonds. The Districts have maintained their AA- rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and Aa rating from Moody's Investor Services, although all COP issues are backed by issuance of letters of credit and are rated AAA. The Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget provides for$32,620,000 to service the debt on the various COPs issued. In addition, there is a $15,000 annual payment to maturity in January 1999 for the G.O. bonds in District No. 1 1. Consolidation of the districts will have no impact on the liabilities of CSDOC. Under consolidation into a single County Sanitation District, the new County Sanitation District assessments all predecessor district obligations. Further, the districts are presently joined by agreement to manage and fund liabilities. The new consolidated District will establish special zones upon consolidation to continue differential user fees and to ensure that predecessor districts' outstanding debt is serviced by only those residents who originally assumed that debt. The boundaries of each zone will be the same as those of each predecessor district. The new consolidated District will establish nine (9) zones to differentiate and account for costs, revenues and liabilities of the existing districts. In addition, an Improvement District (ID) could be formed coincident with each predecessor district's service area to enable proper segregated accounting for the retirement of the existing Certificates of Participation (COPs) debt. As new future borrowing may occur, new ID's would be formed to include the service area benefiting from the projects. Such new ID's would not necessarily have boundaries congruent with the zones. For projects at the treatment plants, however, an ID to include all of the new District's service area could be formed to properly allocate the cost of such improvements that would benefit all the zones. It is also expected that the consolidated District would continue the practice of dedicating Ad Valorem Taxes where it would be collectable within a zone to the retirement of long-term debt of an appropriate ID. F. Management and Employees CSDOC presently operates in a consolidated fashion pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code Section 4840 et seq. CSDOC currently employs approximately 560 full-time employees. Legal Services are provided by the law firm of Woodruff, Spradlin and Smart auditing services are also provided by contract. In addition, various other services are contracted-out. These include such varied services as groundskeeping, environmental review, ocean research and reporting, etc. CSDOC's organization chart is included in CSDOC's Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget which is submitted along with this application. The existing net joint operation budget for Fiscal Year 1997-98 is $46,922,650. Consolidation of the districts into a single District would result in the continuation of management and operational structures and functional expenditures similar to those described above. Operations of the new District would remain the same as the current operations of CSDOC. Consequently, there would be no change in employee compensation and employee benefits as adjustments would not be required. The transition from the existing joint operation to a single District operation would have no impact on employees, their occupational status, or their benefits. Page 4 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service G. Rates and Charges Each district, except District No. 14, has an adopted Sanitary Sewer Service Fee to provide funding for operating the sewer systems in accordance with the Clean Water Act and CSDOC's Revenue Program. District No. 14 is funded through the payment of an annual charge by the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) directly to CSDOC. IRWD levies and collects individual user charges from each parcel receiving service. Sanitary Sewer Service Fees are set annually by each district after a review of projected needs. In May, 1997, The Board of Directors adopted a user rate increase fee schedule that provides for gradual rate increase over the next five years for six of the nine districts. This represents that first user rate increase in seven years. The Districts have been able to avoid user fee increases by reducing operational costs through reorganizing and streamlining Districts operations, holding vacant positions open, and deferring new facilities. However, because the Districts'capital improvement program's debt service obligations continued to increase beyond the level of its primary funding source, i.e. property tax revenues, and because of the additional capital improvement requirements, increase in user fees became inevitable. The following is the adopted Annual Sewer Service Fee Rate Schedule District 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 1 $91.36 $100.27 $110.04 $120.77 $132.55 2 $73.00 $75.00 $77.00 $80.00 $82.00 3 $75.00 $76.00 $77.00 $78.00 $80.00 5 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 6 $78.00 $80.00 $82.00 $84.00 $86.00 7 $55.00 $60.00 $66.00 $73.00 $80.00 11 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 $101.25 $113.91 13 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 As was indicated previously, establishment of special zones upon consolidation would continue the existing schedules of differential Sanitary Sewer Service Fees until such time as amended by action of the governing body. Said fees shall not be amended without a two- thirds vote of all members of the governing body. Consolidation is expected to facilitate reorganizing and streamlining the new District's operations. H. Summary of Revenues and Expenses The CSDOC Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget, which is included in this application package, contains detailed information regarding revenues and expenses. Attention is called to Section 3, pages 1-13, of the Budget document for summary information. Ill. DESCRIPTION OF THE CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT A. General Page 5 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service The nine independent County Sanitation Districts currently collectively known as CSDOC, and which utilize joint operating,working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, will be consolidated into a single County Sanitation District pursuant to the California County Sanitation District Act (Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq.). The boundaries of the consolidated District will be the same as the outer boundaries of those nine predecessor districts. B. Types of Services, Level and Range of Services The new District will assume all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of the former CSDOC. The District will own and operate the wastewater treatment system which provides sewage collection, treatment and disposal services currently owned and operated by the nine (9) Sanitation Districts known jointly as CSDOC. C. District Structure The District' s organization will be the same as that structure which presently exists under the CSDOC joint operating agreement for the operation and administration of the joint facilities. D. Governing Board Composition The new District will be formed under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65. Under Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65, the governing body of the consolidated District would be made up of a 25-member board representing local cities, sanitary districts and the County of Orange unincorporated area. Board membership would decrease from 29 to 25 with the loss of double representation for the Cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Yorba Linda and the County of Orange. The proposed governing Board formed under Section 4730.65 would include the following agencies: • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Tustin Buena Park La Habra Santa Ana Cypress La Palma Seal Beach Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Stanton Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District I • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District • County (1) -County of Orange (to represent the Unincorporated Areas) Page 6 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service E. Three Year Budget of the Consolidated District It is anticipated that revenues and expenditures which would have been budgeted by CSDOC for the operation and administration of joint facilities and the construction of capital improvements will be the basis for the new District's financial plan. Attachment A is a 3-year projection of the District's budget under consolidation. The projection covers Fiscal Years 1998-99, 1999-2000 and 2000-2001. Attachment B is a summary of anticipated capital improvements for the new District. This summary of capital needs was derived from CSDOC's Joint Works Capital Improvements Budget. IV IMPACTS ON CUSTOMERS There will be no negative financial impact on customers. No rate changes are anticipated as a result of the consolidation. Please refer to previous discussion regarding the formation of special zones. V. IMPACTS ON OTHER JURISDICTIONS There will be no service level impacts on any of the cities, sanitary districts, and other agencies presently relying on services provided by CSDOC as the services responsibilities, without modification, will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Effective date is proposed as July 1, 1998. VI. IMPACTS ON REGIONAL PARTICIPATION All CSDOC's contractual obligations will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Accordingly, there are no anticipated impacts. Page 7 Consolidated Sanitation Distrct of Orange County Proiected Budgets Fiscal Years 1998-99 Thru 2000-01 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 Revenues Industrial/Commercial Use Fees $ 9,317,000 $ 10,714,000 $ 12,322,000 Sewer Service Fees 65,938,000 68,907,000 72,436,000 Fees From Other Agencies 6,150,000 4,700,000 5,250,000 Connection Fees 6,784,000 8,065,000 9,727,000 Interest 22,443,000 22,420,000 21,749,000 Miscellaneous&Other 2,640,500 4,141,500 4,141,500 Property Taxes 30,572,000 30,565,000 30,562,000 New COP Issues 53,200,000 57,000,000 62,400,000 Total Revenues $ 197,044,500 $ 206,512,500 $ 218,587,500 Requirements Collection System O&M Expenses $ 9,553,000 $ 10,804,000 $ 10,527,000 Treatment System O&M Expenses 47,861,000 48,818,000 49,794,000 Collection System Improvements 20,997,000 24,902,000 26,497,000 Treatment System Improvements 70,086,000 78,429,500 96,380,500 GO Bond Principal & Interest 16,000 16,000 - Costs of New COP Issuance 2,660,000 2,850,000 3,120,000 COP Service &Retirement 37,772,000 42,590,000 47,834,000 Total Expenses $ 188,945,000 $ 208,409,500 $ 234,152,500 Revenue Exceeding Expenses $ 8,099,500 $ (1,897,000) $ (15,565,000) Beginning Cash Balances 385,031,450 393,130,950 391,233,950 Ending Cash Balances $ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,668,950 Appropriations, Dedications & Reserves "Dry Period" Operating Cash Flow $ 28,800,000 $ 30,121,000 $ 30,737,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,483,000 11,925,000 12,064,000 Capital Projects Completion 49,995,000 49,946,200 49,540,100 Environmental Requirements Reserve 4,634,000 4,484,000 4,484,000 Required.Debt&COP Service Reserves 38,359,000 41,133,000 44,230,000 "Dry Period" COP Service Cash Flow 27,705,350 31,244,600 35,022,350 Property& Liability Catastrophe Reserve 89,752,850 90,971,850 91,208,250 Rate Stabilization Funds 142,401,750 131,408,300 108,383,250 1 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,668,950 Unappropriated Cash & Investment Balances $ - $ - $ - County Sanitation District No. 1 Schedule of Distllct Collection System Projilds CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REQ EST REO EST REQ EST REQ FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 /998.99 IM2000 2000.01 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMP-ROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 1.Miscellaneous Projects 250.000 25,000 25.000 25,000 25,000 25.000 125.000 125.000 250.000 'SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABIUTY 250,000 25.000 25,000 25.000 25.000 25.t100 125.000 125.000 250.000 REHABILITATION PRQJECTS 1.Santa Ana Trunk Sewer Rehab.(1) 6.300,000 75.000 75.000 6.225.000 6.300.000 2.Sunflower Manhole Rehab.(1)7-21'(30%) 140.000 30.000 80.000 30.000 140.000 140.000 3.Dyer Road Manhole Rehab.11) 350.000 50.000 200,000 100.000 350.000 350,000 4.Maln-Dyer Manhole Rehab.(1) 350,000 50.000 100.000 150,000 200.000 350.000 ' 5.Greenv0le•SuIl van Manhole Rehab.(1) 200,000 50,000 100.000 150,000 50,000 r 200.000 8.ROM St.Manhole Rehab.(1) 230.000 230,000 230.000 SUB-TOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 7.570,000 75.000 30.000 130.000 330,000 300,000 M.000 8,705,1100 7,570,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT8 7.620,000 100.000 55,000 155,000 355,000 1 325.000 990.000 8,830.000 7.820.000 Partlelly funded by District No.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 2 Schedule of District Collection System Projeaft CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A a C D E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST RED EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEAR TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1097-98 1998.99 1999-2000 2000.01 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOT COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACITY 1.Replace Euclid Relkt Trunk Sewer,PA to Edkper(1) 6,750,000 8,750,000 8,750,000 2.Replacement d Newhope Placentia Trunk 2-3R(2) 6,500,000 250.000 3,000,000 3,250.000 3.250.000 8,500.000 3.Replacement d Cypress Ave.Subtr nk 24R(2) 5,750,000 250,000 2.000,000 3,000,000 500.000 5,750,000 5,750,000 1.Tall Interceptor Sewer.2-6-3(1) 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 5.BatavI&4*neoin Trunk Refld(1) 325,000 325,000 325,000 8.Balsa Sewer ReOd(1) 460,000 160,000 160,000 7.Santa Ana River IMr(SJIR.IJ Reilef,2 31•(1) 13,414,000 01,000 350,OOD 2,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 12,350,000 1.000,000 13,350,000 8.Carbon Canyon Dam Tnmk Saucer 3 P.S.AboWn.(2) 1.775.000 175,000 1,500,000 100,000 1.775,000 1,775,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPRO CAP. 38,774,000 64.000 115.000 2.100,000 4.100.000 8.250,000 8.500.000 23.125.000 13.585.000 38.710.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIREL 1.AbandownaN d Yorba LkWa Pump Station (2) 200.000 00 50.000 50,0 150.000 200,000 2.Santa Ana River W Manhole It Access.2-14-SW(1) 5.052,000 452,000 200.000 200,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 200.000 4,600,000 4,600,000 3.91 Freeway VNdenkp Pmjeds,2-7A'• 105.000 92.000 13.000 - 13,000 13,000 4.1-5 Freeway Widening Projed.2-35 •• 109.000 15,000 50,000 44,000 94.000 94.000 5.1-5 Freeway VNdenkV Project,2-3A •• 24.000 4.000 20.000 20,000 20,000 6.Santa Ana River 1*Shut 00 Gate Replacemenl 325,000 75.000 250,000 325.000 325,000 7.Pump Station Improvements,2-37•(10%) 398,700 3.700 60.000 60,000 140,000 135.000 395,000 395.000 8.Mlscellanam 1 Projeds 600,000 100,000 100,o00 I 100,000 100.000 100,000 500,000 1W,000 6WAW SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENT134tELU80.(iY 6,813,700 566,700 I 516,000 654,000 1 2.240.0001 2.235,000 350.000 1 5.997,000 1 250,000 1 6,247.000 REHABILITATION PROJECTS 1.Euclid Trunk Manhole Rehab.234R 952.000 122,000 70.000 730.000 30.000 830.000 830.000 2.South Santa Alta River Tank Easement,2.39 18,000 16,000 SUBTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 968,000 138.000 70,000 730,000 30,000 830,000 830.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 41,555,700 769,700 763,000 3.484,000 6.370.000 1Q485,000 8,114W.O 0 29.95$000 13.1135,0 XI 43.781.010 PaAlety tended by Other Dlstrlds ••Costs to be reimbursed by Catrans 1.MASTER44 ANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION 2.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN 3 CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 3 Schedule of District Collection System Prol", CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A 8 C 0 E F 0 H 1• J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FNE EST S YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-99 1998-09 1999-2000 2000-01 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2W7 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVE ENTSpNCREASE CAPACRY 1.Artesia Branch Subimink Relief(3) 4W,000 50.000 300.000 50,000 400,000 400,000 2.Westsids Relief interceptor Parallel(3) 5.700.000 5.700,0Wp 5,700,00D 3.Wdstside Relief Trunk(3) 700,000 7W 000 7W0,000 4.Orsihps-Weslem Subtrunk Relief Sewer,3.25(2) 1,207,000 57.000 100,000 1.000,000 50.000 1,150,000 1,150,000 5.Knott INT Relief,Orangelhorpe to Artesia(3) 3.300,000 100,000 1,500.000 1.500,000 3.100.000 2W OW 3,3W .000 6.Hoover-Westem Subtrunk Relief an Trask(3) 1.050,000 50,000 50g000 5W.000 1,050.000 1.050.000 7.Miller-Holder.Artesia to Hil sborough.3-36-1 12) 6,335.000 65.000 150.000 3.OW.000 2.000.000 120.000 6,270,000 6.270.000 8.Miller-Holder knprov.. Imperial Hwy..3-30-3(2) 3.330,000 230.000 2.000.000 1.000,000 100,000 3.100.000 3,1W .000 9.Los Aiamilos Subtrunk Relief(3) 5.000.000 5,000.000 5,000,000 10.Magnolia Relief Swr,Wstmim-TresK 3JSR•1(1) 2.300,000 300.000 1,800.000 200.000 ,2,000,000 2.000.000 11.Slater Ave.Purnp Station Rapt.11.17-1(1)•(12.4%1 1.238.000 1.228.000 10.0001 10,000 10,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTS/INCREASE CAP. 29.560,000 1.880.000 3.960,0001 4,200,000 2,400,000 1 3,420,000 1 2.100,000 16,080.000 1 11,800,000 2T,880,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILfIY 1.Tedhile Pips Clain.3.38•• 2.112,0W 2.012.000 1110,000 100.000 100.000 2. 1-5 Freeway Widening,3-37•••• 43.000 13.000 20.000 10.000 30,000 30.000 3.Refoo portion of Los Alamitos Subtnrk 3-8-1 65.000 60.000 15,000 15.000 15,000 4.Purnp Station Improvements,2-37•••(14%) 558.200 5.200 84.0W 84.000 196.000 1119.000 553.000 553,000 S.Miscellaneous Projects I 1.000.000 1W0.000 1 100,0001 100,0001 100,000 I 1WAW 5W.Ow 5W.OW 1,000.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 1 3,770,2001 2,0W.2001 319.0001 194,0001 296.0001 289,000 1 1W0,000 I 1,198,000 I 5W.00g 1 1.698.000 REHABILITATION PROJECTS C NkJhols Street Tnadr Phrd►Rehab•(57.6%) (4) 500.000 - - 500.000 500.000 2.Magnolia Tank Sower Rehab.3.35R (2) 3.708.000 908.000 750,000 1.500,000 5MAW :2wo ,000 $8W .000 3.Seal Beach Blvd Rehab.,3-11R 98.000 38.000 20,000 40.000 0W0 60,000 SUB TOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 4.306.000 946.000 W0 770,0 1,540,000 550,000 1 6W.0W 3.360.000 GRAD TOTAL CAPITAL PAPROVEMENTS 37.644.200 4.905.200 6.049.000 6,934,000 I 3,246,000 I 3.709.000 1 2.21110.000 1 20,138.000 1 12,604000 32,736.000 • Po tialy funded by District No.I 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION »ClaWAppeat poldiM 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN •••Partially funded by Other Districts 3 MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION ••••StMed to reimbursement by CALTRANS 4.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN a CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 5 Schedule of Olstdct Collection System Projects_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C 0 E F O H I J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REG EST REO EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2MO PURCHASES 1997-98 1OW99 1988.2000 2000-01 2WI-W YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE _CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACITY 1.W.Coast Wy Gravity Tnmk Rehab,5.37-3(20%)•(1) 819,I)w 599.000 20,000 20.0W 20.OW PUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTS414CREASE CAP. 819.000 599.000 20.0001 A 20.0W 1 A 20.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABIL 1.Newport Blvd.a PCH Widenin0,5-41•(42%) 200.OW 20,000 160.000 20.000 180.000 180.000 2.Relocation d Lido Pump Salton."1-1•'• 895.OW 25.000 225.000 575.000 70,000 e70.000 1170.000 3.Purrp Station InWavertierda.2-37.128%) 1.118.4W 10,400 188.000 168,000 392,000 378.000 1.106.000 1.100,000 1.M11-0 emo ftlects 350.0W 125.000 1 25.000 1 25,000 1 25.000 1 25.000 225.000 1 125.000 1 350.0W SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMMOVEMENTSM031 IUTY 2.581,4m 55.400 678.000 788.000 1 487,000 1 403,0001 25,0001 2.381.0001 125.0001 2.508.000 REHABIUTA71ON PROJECT 1.019 Cenyen Tnmk Rehabilitalien(2) 2.000.OW 50.000 000,000 1.000.000 50,000 2.OW.000 2,OW.000 2.Babw Pannkm a Rehab 500.000 500.000 500.0W SUG-TOTAL REHASWTATION PROJECTS 2.500,000 50.000 e00.000 1.000.000 50.000 2.0011.1100 SWAM 2,500.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 5,860.400 851.400 898,000 838.000 1.387.000 1.40.7.000 75.000 4.401.000 825.000 1 5.026.000 •Par0eiy QmdW by Olsbld No.8 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION «Partially pied by Other pI*(ds 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION •••Costs pstie0y shared with City Of Newport Beach County Sanitation District No. 6 Schedule of District Collection System Project CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 1996-99 1999.2000 200MI 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2W7 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE 1.W.Cond Hwy Gnn*Tank Rehab.5-37-3(80%)'(1) 2.478.000 2,398,000 80.000 80,000 80,000 2.Fairview Rdd. Baker St.Io Wison St..8-1212) 3,N5.000 380,000 1,000,000 1.700.000 355.000 3.005.000 3.085A00 3.Distrld 8 Trunk Pareld(3) 1,325,000 25,000 3W.000 tA00,000 1.325.000 1.325.000 4.Dover Drive Trunk Parallel(3) 1.500,000 100,000 1.000.000 4W.000 1.500.000 1.500.000 5.Co/epe Ave.P.S.Parald F.M.(5%)-(2) 74,000 1.500 7.500 65.000 72,500 72.500 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAP. 8.820.000 2.777,500 07.500 1.065.000 1.825,000 1,885. 1,40D.000 8,042,500 0.042.500 CAPITAL 1.Newport Blvd.6 PCH Wdenkrp.5-41(58%) 277,000 28.000 221.000 20.000 249,000 249,000 2.Wdson Ave/CaYMrNs Strad Sewer,8-13(2) 1.060,000 35,000 110,000 915.000 1.025,000 1.025.000 3.W der"of"M I ru Cosh Mesa 100,000 100,GOD 100 000 4.Mbedanean Pro" 250.0W 25.OW 25,000 25.0W 25.000 25.00D 125.000 126.000 250,WD 5.Pump SWw Improvements.2-37—(8%) 239.200 2.200 38.000 38.W0 84.000 81,000 237.000 237.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIREIJABIUTY 1.928.2W 65.200 392.000 1,004,000 109.000 108,OD0 25.000 1,838= 225.000 1.881.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 10,7{8,200 2,842,700 479,5W $089,000 1.934.000 1.771,000 1.425.0 0 -Lao.= 225,000 7.903.500 • Perfidy tended by District No.5 Partially funded by DISM No.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION «• Partially tended by Other Districts 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 3.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 7 Schedule of District Collet tlon System Proj"_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A. 8 C O E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REO EST RED EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997.99 ISM99 1OW2000 200"1 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002.2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACITY 1.Granite Perk Acres Tnstr Replacement.747(2) 821,000 37.000 50.000 600.000 134,000 T84.000 784.000 2.Tustin Air Base Facilities (3) 5,750,000 150.000 2.000,000 3,000.000 500.000 100,000 - 5.750,000 5.750.000 3.Na1h Tnmk Replacement(3) 2,850.t100 -50,000 1.400.000 1.000.000 2.450.000 200.000 -2,850,000 4. Gisler-Red M Interuptor(3) 5.300.000 300,000 300,000 6A00.000 5.300.000 5.Red Hil IntercAptar Parand(3) 1.400.000 1.400,000 1.400.000 8.Lemon Heights Sewer Replacement. 7-22-1/2(31 6.414.000 1.884.000 $50.000 2,000,000 2,550,000 1.000,000 3,550.000 T.Browning Tnnk Replaoment(3) 850.000 850.000 850,000 8.Codege Ave PS Parallel Form Mab.7-23-1(9S%)-M 1.405,000 27.000 143.WO 1.235.000 1XII.000 1,370.000 0.Improvements to Main SL P.S..7.7-1(26%)•(2) 987,000 217,000 850.000 100,000 750.000 750.000 to.Main St.Pump Station Expanalan.7-7.2(28%)•(3) 775.000 775,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMEW84N REASE CAP. 25.332,000 2.145.000 993,000 3,935.0mm 3.484.000 2,450,1100 3.1mm,0W 13.082.000 e.450.Wg 22.4/2.000 775A00 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSM 1.Pump Station Improvements.2-37 (33%)-(3) 1.315,200 12.200 190.000 198.000 402.000 443.000 1.303J)00 1".000 2.Pump Station Abandonmerd.7-14.3 (3) 425.000 75.000 200,000 150.000 425.000 425.000 3,Miscelanown Projects 500.000 50,000 50.000 50,000 50,000 60,000 250.000 260.000 500.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPR0VEMENTSIREUABIUTY 2,240,200 12.200 248.000 323,000 712,000 645.000 60.000 1.976.000 250.000 2=11.000 1.Suntimer Manhols Rehab.7-21 (70%)••(3) 308.000 tow 70,000 185.000 50.000 305,000 305.000 2.Mlsmlaneor»Repair of local Sewers (4) 5.600.000 1w.000 1,200,000 1.200.000 1.200.000 1"11.000 4.900.000 70111Amg 5.600.000 SUBTOTALREHAB(LITAT(ONPROJECTS 5.1108.000 1,000 100.000 1. Am 1385Aw 1,250.0 o 1.M.000 6.205;m00 700,000 6,905Aw GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 33.478,200 2.158,200 1.341.000 5,528,000 6.581.000 4,345.000 4,350.000 L21.145.11W 9.400,000 3%545.000 T76A00 •Pwtb*tended by DI1rf-No,14 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION ParOaly tlmded by Dlsbld No.1 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN "•Partially Ilnded by District No.6 3.MASTER-PLANNED FACIU71ES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION «»Pwly Named by 00m Dbbkb 4.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN 6 CONSTRUCTION .1L County Sanitation District No. II Schedule of District Collection System Prol"_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST S YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHWSES 1997-98 1998-99 1OW2000 2000-01 200"2 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAPACITY 1.Slater Ave.Pump Station Rapt,11-17-1(1)•(87.6%) 6,520.000 6.450.000 70,000 70,000 70,000 2.Goldenwed SL Sewer RaplaemneK 11-17-2 (1) 2.730.000 44.000 135.000 500.000 2.000.000 50.000 2.805.000 2,885,000 3.Sister Ave.Relief(2) 1.700.000 - /.700.000 1.700.000 4.Halt Interceptor(2) 3.150.000 150.000 3.000.000 3.160.000 3.150.000 5.SlatedSpringdate Replacement(2) 800.000 em.000 800.000 8.Warner Ave Sewer Relief(2) 1.500.000 1.500.000 1.500.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAP. 10.400.000 0.495,000 205.000 500,000 2,000,000 200.000 3.000.000 5.905.000 4.000.000 e.90S.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSMELLA!LrTY 1.Huntington Beady Purchase Aband.11-10(2) 325,000 75.000 25000 325.000 325,000 2.Pump Station Improvwnwft,247(s%)~(2) 350.300 3.300 54,000 54.000 12e.000 121.000 355.000 355.000 3.Miscellaneous ProJeets e00.000 00 160.000 50,000 50,0 50.000 50,00 00 0 350.000 250.0 800.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABIUTY 1.283.300 3.300 279,000 354.000 170,000 171.000 50.000 1,030.000 250,000 1.280.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1_17.6113.3001 8.498.300 484.000 854.000 2.176.000 371,000 3.050.000 8.935.000 4.250.000 11.165.000 PaNaly forded by District No.3 Partially handed by Other 013111c s 1.MASTER44 ANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 14 Schedule of Dietrkt Collection System Projects':' CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1907-98 1998.89 1999.20W 2000-01 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAPACITY 1.Improveam"to Main St.P.S..7.7-1(72%)11) 2.120,000 195.000 1,675,000 250.000 1.925,000 1,925,000 2.MaIA Street Pwnp Station E panslon,7-7-2(721)—M 2.000,000 2,000.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIIMCiEASE CAP. 1,120,000 195,000 1,075,000 250,000 1.925,000 .1.925.O0D 2.000.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS41ELIABUM 1.Miscellaneous proJeda 250.000 25.000 25.000 25,000 25.000 25.000 125,000 125.000 250,O00 SUBTOTAL CAP.WPROVEMENTSIREtUBpJTY 250.000 25,000 25.000 26.000 25,000 25,000 125.000 125.000 250.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENF;S 4.370.000 195.000 1,700,000 275.000 11 25.0001 26,000 2.050.0001 125.0001 2,176,000 $000.000 • Partlaly funded by 01*1d No.? '•Future construction now 2020.paAioly funded by 0.7 1.MASTER-PLAITED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION ti i RESOLUTION NO. 97-33-3 INITIATING PROPOSAL TO CONSOLIDATE DISTRICTS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 APPLYING TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 56000, ET SEQ. WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts were originally formed and organized in 1947-48 as separate districts providing sewer services, generally following the drainage patterns of Orange County; and, WHEREAS, Orange County's sewer system is now well-established, and the current main focus of.the nine districts is on joint projects and the attendant regulatory issues; and, WHEREAS, over the years, the continuation of the nine districts as separate entities has contributed to certain administrative and financial burdens; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Part 3 of Division 3 of Title 5 of the Government Code, known as the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 ("the Act"), certain local agencies may make request to the Local Agency Formation Commission for a change of organization or a reorganization; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 3 is a local agency authorized to make such a proposal; and, Y f� td WHEREAS, "consolidation" is one type of change of organization or reorganization permitted by the Act, defined as the uniting or joining of two or more districts, formed pursuant to the same principal act, into a single new successor district; and, WHEREAS, notice of intent to adopt this resolution of application has not been given to each interested and each subject agency as is permitted, but not required by Government Code Section 56800(b); and, WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be consolidated is inhabited; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of streamlining administration and Board procedures, maintaining financial and other records, and reducing costs, it has been determined by the District that the proposed consolidation will effect substantial administrative benefits and financial savings, both individually and collectively. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: This proposal for a change of organization is made pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 2: The change of organization proposed herein is the consolidation of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 into a single County Sanitation District, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. i • Ir Section 3: The boundaries of the affected nine districts are as depicted in Exhibit "A", attached. The boundaries of the proposed consolidated district are as depicted in Exhibit "B", attached. Section 4: Terms and conditions of the proposed consolidation regarding consolidation of assets and financial obligations are set forth on Exhibit "C", attached. Section 5: The number and method of selection of members of the governing Board shall be as provided in California Government Code Section 4730.65. Section 6: The following person is to be furnished with copies of the report by the Executive Officer and to be given mailed notice of the hearing on the proposal: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Section 7: This proposal is to be considered a formal request that proceedings for consolidation be taken pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 8: A plan for providing services within the affected territory is attached as Exhibit "D". Section 9: The effective date of the consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 24, 1997. H:\wp.dta\admin\BS\RES\RES97\97-33-3.doe STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, PENNY KYLE, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97-33-3 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board on the 24th day of September, 1997, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Margie Rice, Chair; Steve Anderson; George Brown; Tom Carroll; John Collins; Patsy Marshall; Pat McGuigan; Eva Miner-Bradford; Chris Norby; Dave Sullivan; Charles E. Sylvia; Bob Zemel NOES: Mark Leyes; William G. Steiner ABSENT: Brian Donahue; Burnie Dunlap IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, this 24th day of September, 1997. Penny Kyl a tary Board of Directoft of Co hty Sanitation, District No. 3 of Orange County, California \Vead\data2\wp.dta\admin\BS\FORMS\97\F13.033.3.dx EXHIBIT A— Map of Current Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 r LOS ANGELES COUNTY S wNlrneR vivo O qti LA HABRA q��t.ne�q LAMBERT RO C`C�RqO/ IMPERIAL HWV v OG C B EA ,t,` EASTANC NURV Rp L RTON VORBA UNOA BLVD MALVERN YORBA CHA/MAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� I ff 1 9 oJ� ORANOET1101 AVE I 2 �G I UENA i O LA rPARK �Co PALM UNmLNAVE] I > a5 ANAHEIM W VILLA r0 BAURo CYPRESS I W TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON ; LAMITOS O I RAN J E s W M CNA/MAN AV8 S uWi GARDEN GRO STMI SlSTE WBSTMINSTER IAVB 1TTN ST 7 B � O W < Tus R ^ MCI OEN Sr SANT W i ANA WARNER AVE $ FQUNTA ? 1 E US AVE ALLEY HUN I IN IT N FAC ADAMS A 9 y O PACIFIC AMLTONAVE COST OCEAN MESA �° IRVINE P, 4. P 5 J TP NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SRVM-CLR.CDR . CSDOC 1195 EXHIBIT B—Map of Proposed Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S S-0 wNiM p,9 9�e� LA HABRA �d gtic 9tiq LAMENT nD lCC 90 IM►EWAL HWY B EA cOG T EASTAN NUNY PC ~,Y L ON b"EA UNOA SLVO MALVERN _ YORBA CHA►MANAVG LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� OIMI eTNo1 we 'O �5 U Ep vA LA PALM uNCOLLNAA�^ g I ANAHEIM a VILLA p �G SAuFm CYPRESS I W TA Ave LOS STANTON PARK LAMITOS I s RANGE i > a CHAPMAN AVB SI a 0 GARDEN O yv' � GRO STMI�IS re S wemawsrenl+ve ITTN sr ' B W TUS 7t MC F EN ST a{ g SANT W o ANA WAPNEA Ave F Fp UNTA I a t EMUS Avel ALLEY HUN INP4ADAMSASA N FA .PACIFIC AWLTONAVe COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE 41 P� b e P r ' NEWPORT BEACH N SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Exhibit C LAFCO Application Terms & Conditions Consolidation of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1. The nine separate districts known jointly as the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ("CSDOC") shall be consolidated into one single county sanitation district pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code Sections 4730 et seq.) and shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County ("District'). [G.C. §56844(v)] (As used herein, "CSDOC" refers to the nine Districts, both jointly, singly and in any combination.) 2. As a result of consolidating, the nine existing districts shall be dissolved and be reorganized as one consolidated District with one consolidated Board of Directors under California Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. At the time of consolidation, the Board of Directors would include representatives from the following jurisdictions: [G.C. §56844(n)] • County (1) - County of Orange Unincorporated Area • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Santa Ana Buena Park La Habra Seal Beach Cypress La Palma Stanton Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Tustin Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District 3. Directors of District shall be compensated in accordance with applicable state law. Page 1 4. All system facilities shall be transferred from existing CSDOC to District as of the effective date of consolidation in an "as-is" condition, without any payment or repair obligation from CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(k)(v)] 5. All lands, buildings, real and personal property, assets and appurtenances held by CSDOC, as of the effective date of the consolidation, shall be transferred to District. Such assets are enumerated in the CSDOC Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ending June 30, 1997. [G.C. §56844(b)] 6. District shall be designated as the successor to CSDOC and retain all of the rights, duties and obligations of the former CSDOC with respect to enforcement, performance or payment of any outstanding bonds, contracts or obligations of the former CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(m)] 7. All previously authorized charges, fees assessments and/or taxes currently in effect by CSDOC shall be continued by District. [G.C. §56844(t)] 8. The establishment of Special Zones within District, pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 4850 et seq., shall be effected on July 1, 1998 and shall collectively include any or all portions of the entire CSDOC service area and individually include the specified areas as shown on the nine attached maps. The existing rate schedules within each of the Special Zones shall continue as presently in effect by each District within CSDOC until such time as amended by the District's Board of Directors. The annual sewer service charge can only be amended by a vote of two-thirds of all members of the governing body. [G.C. §56844(e)] 9. All agreements by and between any two or more existing CSDOC's, including but not limited to: joint sewer ownership or use, construction or maintenance of facilities, shall be terminated upon the effective date of the consolidation. The termination of the agreements is appropriate in recognition of the new District assuming full and exclusive ownership and authority over all rights, duties and obligations of all existing CSDOC's. 10. To the extent not inconsistent with the terms of the consolidation, and as necessary to cant' out the original intent, all contracts between the Irvine Ranch Water District and one or more existing CSDOC's, including those relating to ownership of capacity rights in treatment, disposal and sewer facilities, shall be assigned to District and remain in full force and effect. All contracts between County Sanitation District No. 14 and one or more Page 2 CSDOC's shall also be assigned to the new District and remain in full force and effect. 11. CSDOC shall transfer any and all indebtedness and the obligation to levy taxes, charges, assessments, or fees in order to make payment of said indebtedness to District. [G.C. §56844(c)] 12. CSDOC shall file a statement with LAFCO that the reorganization shall not adversely affect or impair the status of any employee of CSDOC or District. As'of the effective date of this reorganization, all employees of CSDOC shall become employees of District. Rates of pay, accrued vacation and sick leave, vacation and sick leave accrual rates, employee rights, insurance, retirement benefits, and all other benefits and programs shall be transferred over to District at then-current levels. Memoranda of Understanding in place under CSDOC shall be transferred to the new District. [G.C. §56844(I)] 13. Permits issued to CSDOC by any federal, state or local regulatory authority, shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties as contained within the permits and to continue operations without interruption. Such permits shall include but not be limited to: CSDOC's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit, including a waiver for full secondary treatment pursuant to Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act, and all other air and land permits. [G.C. §56844(v)] 14. Permits issued by CSDOC shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties contained in said permits and in the laws authorizing the issuance of said permits. Such permits shall include but not be limited to Sewer Connection Permits and Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permits. [G.C. §56844(c)] 15. District shall assume all existing contracts and obligations presently in full force and effect with CSDOC and which have not otherwise been specifically referenced herein. [G.C. §56844(m)] 16. The effective date of this consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. [G.C. §56844(p)] Page 3 Map of Special Zone 1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S wNIrnER BLVD Q 9� LA HABRA LIP LAMBERT RD Qi� ,r99 IMPERIAL NWV ' B EA cQG�� OCQG BASTAN NURV �'Y L ON YCRSA LINDA BLVD ' MALVERN YORBA 13 CMAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA J� ORA ETNOmts AVE I 2 Q� O �G UE 4A LA �O PAF K PALMA LIN c, ANAHEIM o VILLA O BALL RD CYPRESS I TA VE PARK LOS STANTON g LAMITOS O ( RAN E 12 12 p 3 m W D S Y a GNAPWN AV8 � a �A GAR D N GRO STMI S SE WESTMINSTER WE J3S►Fi6T::'r:i u 3 1 r T US � b . 8 F UNTA o .:::::...................;:.;::.;;:: 1 El USAVE ALLEY , ,v c HUN INGIT NACH `�� 0 ADAMS AVI6 g� O PACIFIC AMILToNAVE COST OCEAN MESA �° IRVINE eOJ �• ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY s A. WNITTIER BLVO LA HABRA LAMBERT RD IMPERIAL HWY CODA.O/-YO c L ON ioRB�LLwa.Blvn MAWERN ..... 13 ,t"A LACENTIA OM ETNO AVE I i 2 GOJ �O �UE A PALM IJN PA K 5 ANAHEIM O YI L .....iC: .... IIIALL Ro CY6,RE s I PARK LOS STANTON LAMITOS _ RAN_ E.,.,::::::...::@3 W = F :.i 5 > 1c m CNA►MAN AV vi :.. T Ji ::i �' ..;vs ...:.. >; ......... STMI S SE WESTMINSMR VE ,TTII BT 7 8 Y m ■ O TUS S MC F OEN ST SANT W m ANA WARNER AVE 8 F UNTA o 1 E US AVE ALLEY HUN INGF IN AOAMS AVEOJ Gq yr O PACIFIC MILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE \Q DPW O5 g~ NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �6M60/YW OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 3 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 3, wmmr.,,sm.- 9 LA HABRA �tiC '9�►,q 'uwBERrRu: � FC 90 �IIJFERMt NwY '�' OGti /�C B EA BASU NURY YORBA LINDA BLVD L ON YORBA 13 wtvEnN CNAFWNAVE LACENTIA LINDA J� o1M ETHO J1Ve 2 �c<` O G UE A OO �, Lk PALM u PA K i > VILLA dD O AVEPARK ... .. ....... ........ � O ST EAMITO RAN E GARDEN GRO S ;<: I WE3TMpi6iBlt va> ,TTN sr 9 Y x v 1 O T 3w US , O„ O W .::;:;;<:: ANA WARNER AVE 8 F ... r s AVE.ALLEY PP C�'t'l Y• HUN N AQHiA'kiA"huS:AVk PACIFIC AMLTONAVE COS.7. OCEAN MESA �'° IRVINE O5 NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS a OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 5 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S WNITTIER SLVD LA HABRA LAMBERT RD IMPERIAL NWY V CO/ ��770/wO B EA Y� coGA}�- SASTAN NVRY •� L ON YORSA UNM SLYD MALYEAN YORBA 13 CNAPK"N AVE LACENTIA LINDA GOJ�� ORA ETNO AVE I 9sjO� 5 UE A � ca PALM LI PA K �0C EAu Ro CY RE SANAHEIM c VILLA rp LOS W < STANTON LAMITOS T" YE PARK H m l RAN ° E p i F W � < m J > Y e CNAPMAN AV6 = Itl GARD N GRO STMI S SE WESTWNSTER kVE 1"W yT u m TUS O MC R OWN ST 17 g SANT W m ANA WARNER AVE 8 F UNTA i E S AVE ALLEY HUN NGTGN AVAMS A 6J O9 5� 0 PACIFIC OCEAN COSTAIRVINE MESA NEWPORT;; COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS N 1 N 0 1 EOM{O/YY� OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 6 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, wNITnER SLvD 9ti LA HABRA `^,� Oq��l. e`cq.{, LAMBERT RD IMPERIAL NWV B/R EA BASTANC NURY RD L ON vORSA LINDA SLVD MAIVERN YORBA 13 CNAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� OJ�fi ORA ETNOWZ AVE I 2 9�iO �t.`'G LA APALM LAN�UE PA K Og ANAHEIM o VILLA 40 SALL w CYPRESS TA AVE PARK LOS ; STANTON 8 LAMITOS C z O I S RAN G E W O R a m 3 > Y m CHAPMAN AV i y o GAR N GRO STMI S S I WESTMINSTER AVE 17TN ST C B u < O TUS m e ` = MC F EN ST 11 g SANT 14 W m ANA WARNER AVE 8 F UNTA r , 1 E LISAVE ALLEY HUN IN N ADAMS A Q6 , PACIFIC AMILTON AVE OCEAN .C.OST; ;:.: . IRVINE �e �r 5 i rP NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 7 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, WNITTIER VD LA HABRA d LAMBERT AD IMPERIAL NWV CO�j'I'Q�OC' B EA ry oG�Y EASTAN HURT L ON rOReA uNOA BLVD MALVERN YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� OJ� ORA ETNO AVE 2 C C, U E A PALMLA uN PA LN 5I ANAHEIM o VILLA iC RD CY RESS I TA VE PARK LOS STANTON S LAMITOS O S RAN E W o g S > Y CMAPMAN AVp S y o �v GAR D N o GRO STMI S Tl£ SL-. wESTMINSTER vE 1TrN sT TUS J MC F EN 8T �'9L SANT W ANA WARNER AVE t E SAVE ALLEY C HUN NGT N ADAMS A 4J Oq g! O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA °° IRVINE 5 !e~ NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 11 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, wNtrnER BLVD B LA HABRA d 99gc F'9q�n uMBERT RO 9 IMPERIAL HWY B EA BASTAN NURY L ON YORBA UNDA BLVD YORBA �� I„LVERN CNAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� GOJ�. OM ETNONtr.AVE I 2 �5 UE A ., LA PALM UN PA K ; 5 ANAHEIM o VILLA O BAu Ro CY RE S I W TA YE PARK LOS STANTON ; LAMITOS O RANGE a II� 3 0 a 3 > w m CNAPMAN AV6 Z c �� GAR D N GRO STMI S SE WESTLdNSTER VE 17T1i ST a B ` O us m MC F OEN ST SANT WARNER AVE i <'> F UNTA r` E GAVE ALLEY c KUN::NG .. N > ADAMS AVE vJ O,q O PACIFIC AM RXGN:Avr.` COST OCEAN MESA �' Q P IRVINE O5 gs ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS n ' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 13 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 0 AA-- WNITi1ER SLVD LA HABRA 9'g�LQ F9�9 LAMBERT RD � •7OA" IMPERIAL M W V _0/ •yOC B EA V OGw- BASTA NURV VORSA LINDA BLVO MALVERN YORBA ,9 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA OMI OAVE 2 NOETM AV J 2 O O G 5 U E A � LA PA K Cow PALMA uNCpLx AV ANAHEIM I 40 aALL RD CY RE S I ° TA AVE VILLA PARK LOS STANTON o� LAMITOS ` RAN E o F W Q O IC m = J = IC F I W S Y o CNAPMAN AVE 2 w a �A GAR D N � aGRO STMI S SE mm ST B C 7 W W O TUS 7� MC P DEN ST �{ 11 g SANT W m ANA WARNER AVE J , 8 F UNTA s` 1 E US AVE ALLEY ° HUN)rINGTGN , cq ADAMSAVIO qr O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA m' IRVINE v, ONEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS °C•YA M YW OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, WNITTIER BLVD 0,9 gtie� LA HABRA LAMBERT RD 9 IMPERIAL HWV B EA BASTAN NURV ��Y VORBA LINDA BLVD O MALVERN L ON YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LlNDA OJT ORAI ETNO AVE 0 A LA II PU�AE" O PALM U LLN A l K >° C3 I ANAHEIM W VILLA Q 0 BALL Flo CY RE S I '°� TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON m E LAMITOS RANO a F R W D 3 $ b > Y b CNAPMAN AVB Z N < A b W r GARD o � GRO STMI S S^ WESTMINSTER VE 1TTN ST 7 12 B U W ■ S U < 1 f O TUS ?'1 v ��v�iii:�:':vi O MC f DEN Sr I ::::: f%�''� i:.'ii2[ ttitii:iiti:ai ::<':' 11 g SANT O m ANA W WARNER AVE J T 8 F U NTA r a <AL ` P > < 1 E LEY �US AVE HUN IN N A DAMS AVAJ • PACIFIC AMI LTON AVE COST ..... OCEAN ,a MESA �r r e a P Q T 1 Oe NEWPORT BEACH ' N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Exhibit D Plan of Services for the Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County L INTRODUCTION This Plan of Services has been prepared pursuant to Government Code Section 56653, which requires that a plan for providing services within the affected territory be provided whenever an .application for a change of organization is submitted to LAFCO. This document will facilitate the consolidation of the nine (9) existing County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) into one single County Sanitation District pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq. The resulting consolidated agency shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County (District). This consolidation proposes a transfer of all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of CSDOC to the District. The Plan of Services provides a description of CSDOC and its operations and how they will be consolidated as the District. 11. DESCRIPTION OF CSDOC A. General Information The CSDOC is made up of nine independent special districts. Each district is a political subdivision of the State of California and is governed by a representative of each city and sanitary district within the district and, if the District includes unincorporated territory, a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Each district has its own budget. All districts except District Nos. 13 and 14 have their own tax rate and trunk sewer systems. District No. 13 buys capacity in the other districts' transmission facilities. A Joint Administrative Organization was formed in 1948 to administer the business of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities and the activities common to all districts. This is provided for in a Joint Ownership Operation and Construction Agreement. The day-to-day operation of the organization is under the direction of a General Manager, one assistant general manager, eight department heads, for an authorized staff of 560 full time equivalents for the Fiscal Year 1997-98. B. Types of Services, Level, and Range of Service Currently Provided The CSDOC is a single-purpose public entity formed solely for the collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater and its residuals and serves the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal needs of approximately 2.2 million people. During 1996-1997, an average daily sewage influent flow of 244 million gallons per day (MGD) was treated and 510 wet tons per day of residual solids (biosolids) was produced. CSDOC encompasses a 470 square-mile area of Orange County that includes 23 of the County's 31 cities. CSDOC operates the third largest wastewater management agency of its kind west of the Mississippi, with assets valued at more than $1 billion dollars. The nine individual districts own about 650 miles of major trunk sewers, 22 pumping stations and two major treatment plants with disposal facilities to safely discharge the treated effluent through an ocean outfall into deep ocean waters. The treatment plants process an average of 244 million gallons of wastewater per day. Page 1 f CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley. It has a current operational primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 108 MGD and a secondary treatment capacity of 66 MGD currently being expanded to 80 MGD. Treatment Plant No. 2 is in Huntington Beach. It has a primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 186 MGD. Plant No. 2 provides advanced primary treatment to all of the wastewater that enters the plant and secondary treatment to up to 90 MGD of the total flow. Table 1 highlights the service area characteristics and system features. Table 1 Service Area Joint Works Facilities -As of June 30, 1997 Total Population Served (estimated) 2,275,000 Service Area (estimated) 470 square miles Total Number of Cities Served 23 Total Miles of Trunk Sewers 650 Number of Pumping Stations 22 Number of Treatment Plants 2 Primary Treatment Capacity (includes standby) Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 Total Primary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 MGD Secondary Treatment Capacity Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 Total Secondary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . 156 MGD Total Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .450 MGD Reported Average Daily Flow Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 MGD Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 MGD Total Average Daily Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 MGD Page 2 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service C. Description of Sanitary Sewer System CSDOC processes wastewater from the collection systems of the various cities, water districts and local sewer agencies. They do not deal directly with individual customers except for portions of District No. 7,which is located primarily in unincorporated territory of the County near Tustin. CSDOC's assets consist of individual district assets and each district's respective share of jointly owned assets. Table 2 summarizes the respective District ownership in jointly owned and separately owned property, plant, equipment and construction in progress, at cost, as of June 30, 1997: Table 2 District Ownership Jointly Owned Separately Owned Total Total property, plant and equipment $804,200,000 $321,300,000 $1,135,500,000 Less accumulated $310,200,000 depreciation Net property, plant and equipment $825,300,000 D. Additional Assets In addition to its real property and facilities, CSDOC owns service vehicles, equipment, tools, repair parts inventory, and communications and office equipment. CSDOC maintains cash, liquid securities to meet its cash flow requirements, and other reserves. The following table summarizes the districts' reserves budgeted for the end of Fiscal Year 1996-97. Table 3 Reserves Analysis "Dry Period" Operating Cash Flow $28,021,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,221,000 Debt Service Reserves Fund Balance 59,724,000 Capital Reserves 49,233,000 Environmental Requirements Reserves 4,484,000 Flood/Earthquake Insurance Reserves 81,450,000 Rate Stabilization Funds 141,200,000 Total $375,333,000 Page 3 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service E. Liabilities As of June 30, 1997, CSDOC liabilities included debt in the amount of approximately $397,575,000. These issues include $397,45,000 of Certificates of Participation (COP) and $30,000 of general obligation (G.O.) bonds. The Districts have maintained their AA- rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and Aa rating from Moody's Investor Services, although all COP issues are backed by issuance of letters of credit and are rated AAA. The Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget provides for$32,620,000 to service the debt on the various COPs issued. In addition, there is a $15,000 annual payment to maturity in January 1999 for the G.O. bonds in District No. 1 1. Consolidation of the districts will have no impact on the liabilities of CSDOC. Under consolidation into a single County Sanitation District, the new County Sanitation District assessments all predecessor district obligations. Further, the districts are presently joined by agreement to manage and fund liabilities. The new consolidated District will establish special zones upon consolidation to continue differential user fees and to ensure that predecessor districts' outstanding debt is serviced by only those residents who originally assumed that debt. The boundaries of each zone will be the same as those of each predecessor district. The new consolidated District will establish nine (9) zones to differentiate and account for costs, revenues and liabilities of the existing districts. In addition, an Improvement District (ID) could be formed coincident with each predecessor district's service area to enable proper segregated accounting for the retirement of the existing Certificates of Participation (COPS) debt. As new future borrowing may occur, new ID's would be formed to include the service area benefiting from the projects. Such new ID's would not necessarily have boundaries congruent with the zones. For projects at the treatment plants, however, an ID to include all of the new District's service area could be formed to properly allocate the cost of such improvements that would benefit all the zones. It is also expected that the consolidated District would continue the practice of dedicating Ad Valorem Taxes where it would be collectable within a zone to the retirement of long-term debt of an appropriate ID. F. Management and Employees CSDOC presently operates in a consolidated fashion pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code Section 4840 et seq. CSDOC currently employs approximately 560 full-time employees. Legal Services are provided by the law firm of Woodruff, Spradlin and Smart auditing services are also provided by contract. In addition, various other services are contracted-out. These include such varied services as groundskeeping, environmental review, ocean research and reporting, etc. CSDOC's organization chart is included in CSDOC's Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget which is submitted along with this application. The existing net joint operation budget for Fiscal Year 1997-98 is $46,922,650. Consolidation of the districts into a single District would result in the continuation of management and operational structures and functional expenditures similar to those described above. Operations of the new District would remain the same as the current operations of CSDOC. Consequently, there would be no change in employee compensation and employee benefits as adjustments would not be required. The transition from the existing joint operation to a single District operation would have no impact on employees, their occupational status, or their benefits. Page 4 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service G. Rates and Charges Each district, except District No. 14, has an adopted Sanitary Sewer Service Fee to provide funding for operating the sewer systems in accordance with the Clean Water Act and CSDOC's Revenue Program. District No. 14 is funded through the payment of an annual charge by the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) directly to CSDOC. IRWD levies and collects individual user charges from each parcel receiving service. Sanitary Sewer Service Fees are set annually by each district after a review of projected needs. In May, 1997, The Board of Directors adopted a user rate increase fee schedule that provides for gradual rate increase over the next five years for six of the nine districts. This represents that first user rate increase in seven years. The Districts have been able to avoid user fee increases by reducing operational costs through reorganizing and streamlining Districts operations, holding vacant positions open, and deferring new facilities. However, because the Districts' capital improvement program's debt service obligations continued to increase beyond the level of its primary funding source, i.e. property tax revenues, and because of the additional capital improvement requirements, increase in user fees became inevitable. The following is the adopted Annual Sewer Service Fee Rate Schedule District 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 1 $91.36 $100.27 $110.04 $120.77 $132.55 2 $73.00 $75.00 $77.00 $80.00 $82.00 3 $75.00 $76.00 $77.00 $78.00 $80.00 5 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 6 $78.00 $80.00 $82.00 $84.00 $86.00 7 $55.00 $60.00 $66.00 $73.00 $80.00 11 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 $101.25 $113.91 13 1 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 As was indicated previously, establishment of special zones upon consolidation would continue the existing schedules of differential Sanitary Sewer Service Fees until such time as amended by action of the governing body. Said fees shall not be amended without a two- thirds vote of all members of the governing body. Consolidation is expected to facilitate reorganizing and streamlining the new District's operations. H. Summary of Revenues and Expenses The CSDOC Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget, which is included in this application package, contains detailed information regarding revenues and expenses. Attention is called to Section 3, pages 1-13, of the Budget document for summary information. Ill,, DESCRIPTION OF THE CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT A. General Page 5 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D ` Plan of Service The nine independent County Sanitation Districts currently collectively known as CSDOC, and which utilize joint operating,working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, will be consolidated into a single County Sanitation District pursuant to the California County Sanitation District Act(Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq.). The boundaries of the consolidated District will be the same as the outer boundaries of those nine predecessor districts. B. Types of Services, Level and Range of Services The new District will assume all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of the former CSDOC. The District will own and operate the wastewater treatment system which provides sewage collection, treatment and disposal services currently owned and operated by the nine (9) Sanitation Districts known jointly as CSDOC. C. District Structure The District' s organization will be the same as that structure which presently exists under the CSDOC joint operating agreement for the operation and administration of the joint facilities. D. Governing Board Composition The new District will be formed under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65. Under Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65, the governing body of the consolidated District would be made up of a 25-member board representing local cities, sanitary districts and the County of Orange unincorporated area. Board membership would decrease from 29 to 25 with the loss of double representation for the Cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Yorba Linda and the County of Orange. The proposed governing Board formed under Section 4730.65 would include the following agencies: • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Tustin Buena Park La Habra Santa Ana Cypress La Palma Seal Beach Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Stanton Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District I • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District • County (1) -County of Orange (to represent the Unincorporated Areas) Page 6 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service E. Three Year Budget of the Consolidated District It is anticipated that revenues and expenditures which would have been budgeted by CSDOC . for the operation and administration of joint facilities and the construction of capital improvements will be the basis for the new District's financial plan. Attachment A is a 3-year projection of the District's budget under consolidation. The projection covers Fiscal Years 1998-99, 1999-2000 and 2000-2001. Attachment B is a summary of anticipated capital improvements for the new District. This summary of capital needs was derived from CSDOC's Joint Works Capital Improvements Budget. IV. IMPACTS ON CUSTOMERS There will be no negative financial impact on customers. No rate changes are anticipated as a result of the consolidation. Please refer to previous discussion regarding the formation of special zones. V. IMPACTS ON OTHER JURISDICTIONS There will be no service level impacts on any of the cities, sanitary districts, and other agencies presently relying on services provided by CSDOC as the services responsibilities, without modification, will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Effective date is proposed as July 1, 1998. VI. IMPACTS ON REGIONAL PARTICIPATION All CSDOC's contractual obligations will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Accordingly, there are no anticipated impacts. Page 7 915197 — Consolidated Sanitation Distrct of Orange County Proiected Budgets Fiscal Years 1998-99 Thru 2000-01 991 8-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 Revenues Industrial/Commercial Use Fees $ 9,317,000 $ 10,714,000 $ 12,322,000 Sewer Service Fees 65,938,000 68,907,000 72,436,000 Fees From Other Agencies 6,150,000 4,700,000 5,250,000 Connection Fees 6,784,000 6,065,000 9,727,000 Interest 22,443,000 22,420,000 21,749,000 Miscellaneous &Other 2,640,500 4,141,500 4,141,500 Property Taxes 30,572,000 30,565,000 30,562,000 New COP Issues 53,200,000 57,000,000 62,400,000 Total Revenues $ 197,044,500 $ 206,512,500 $ 218,587,500 Requirements Collection System O&M Expenses $ 9,553,000 $ 10,804,000 $ 10,527,000 Treatment System O&M Expenses 47,861,000 48,818,000 49,794,000 Collection System Improvements 20,997,000 24,902,000 26,497,000 Treatment System Improvements 70,086,000 78,429,500 96,380,500 GO Bond Principal &Interest 16,000 16,000 - Costs of New COP Issuance 2,660,000 2,850,000 3,120,000 COP Service&Retirement 37,772,000 42,590,000 47,834,000 Total Expenses $ 188,945,000 $ 208,409,500 $ 234,152,500 Revenue Exceeding Expenses $ 8,099,500 $ (1,897,000) $ (15,565,000) Beginning Cash Balances 385,031,450 393,130,950 391,233,950 Ending Cash Balances $ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,668,950 Appropriations, Dedications & Reserves "Dry Period" Operating Cash Flow $ 28,800,000 $ 30,121,000 $ 30,737,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,483,000 11,925,000 12,064,000 Capital Projects Completion 49,995,000 49,946,200 49,540,100 Environmental Requirements Reserve 4,634,000 4,484,000 4,484,000 Required Debt&COP Service Reserves 38,359,000 41,133,000 44,23Q000 "Dry Period"COP Service Cash Flow 27,705,350 31,244,600 35,022,350 Property &Liability Catastrophe Reserve 89,752,850 90,971,850 91,208,250 Rate Stabilization Funds 142,401,750 131,408,300 108,383,250 •$ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,668,950 Unappropriated Cash &Investment Balances $ - $ - $ - County Sanitation District No. 1 Schedule of D%Md Collection Systan Pnggcgs CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A e C D E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST RED EST REG EST REG EST RED FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-90 1998e9 1990-2000 2000.01 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILRY 1.Mlsce/an"m Projects 250.000 25,000 25,000 F 25.000 25,000 29.000 125,000 125.000 250.000 'SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 250,000 25.000 1 25,000 1 25.000 1 25.0001 25.000 125.000 125.M* 250,000 REHABILITATION PROJECTS 1.Santo Ana Tnn*Sewer Rehab.(1) 0,700.000 75,000 75,000 0,225,000 0,]00,000 2.Sunflower Manhole Rehab.(1)7-21'(30%) f10.000 30.000 90,000 30,000 110,000 140.000 3.Dyer Road Mod wle Rehab.(1) 350.00D 50.000 200,000 100.000 350.000 350,000 1.M*s-oyw Manhole Rehab.(1) 550.000 50.000 100,000 150.000 200.000 350.000 5.Grsenv/e-Suthan Manhole Rehab.11) 200.000 50.000 100.000 .150.000 50.000 200.000 0.Rafe SI.Maiiola Rehab.(1) 230.000 270.000 250.00D SUBTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 7.570.000 75.000 30.000 130.000 2.70,000 300.000 OW.000 6.705.000 7,570,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 7.020.000 10D.000 55,000 Iss.000 355,000 325,000 990,000 0,070,000 TA20,000 • P"ally funded by Dlsbfd No.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 2 Schedule of Dhstrlct Collectlon System Pmjedfs CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A e C D E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARZ TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 1998-99 1999.20W 2000D1 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOT COMPLETE NT CAPITAL IMPROVEMESANCREASE CAPACITY 1.Replace Eudid Relict Tr nk Sewer.P.1 to E fter(1) 6.750,0m 6,750,000 6,750,000 2.Replacement ofNewhope Plaoentle Trunk 2-3R(2) 6.500,000 250.000 3,000,000 3.250.000 3.250.000 0,500.000 00 3.Replacement d Cypress Ave.Sultr nk, 24R(2) 5,150,000 250.000 2,0 .000 3.000.000 WOW5,750.000 5,750.000 1.Tall Interceptor Sewer,2$3(1) 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 5.Balevla LkKok�tnnk Repel(1) 325,000 325,000 325,000 S.Bolse Sewer ReIld(1) 460,000 460,000 460,000 7.Santa Ana River Intr(SA.R.I.)Relief,2-31'(1) 13.414.000 $4.000 350,000 2.000.000 5,000,000 5.000.000 12.350.000 1.000.000 13,350,000 8.Carbon Canyon Dam Tnrnk Sewer&P.S.Abarrdn.(2) 1.775,000 175,000 1,500.000 100,000 1.775,000 1.775,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 36,771,000 64,000 175,000 2.100.000 4.100,000 a 250,000 6,500,000 23,125,000 13,565,000 36,710,000 CAPITAL SPROVEMENTS0LIABILff 1.Abarrdonmerd of Yorba Linda Pump Station (2) 200.000 50.000 50.000 150.000 200.000 2.Santa Ana Rim brtr Manhole A Access,2.145R2'(1) 5.052.000 452,000 200.000 200.000 2,000,000 2,000,000 200.000 4.600.000 4,600,000 3.91 Freeway VMdenkrp Pr*ds,2.7A" 105.000 92,000 13.000 13,000 13,000 4.1-5 Freeway Widenkro Project,2-35 " 109,000 15.000 50.000 41,000 94.000 94.000 S.1-5 Freeway Wlderrinp Prged.2-3A " 24.000 4,000 20.000 20,000 20,000 S.Santa Ana Rim bdr S1nt OR Gate Replsoerlm 325.000 75,000 250,0W 325,000 325,000 , 7.Pump Station bnprovemerts,2-37•(101i) 398,700 3.700 60,000 60.000 140,000 135.000 395,000 395,000 8.Miscellaneous Pr*ds 600,000 100,000 1 100.0001 100.000 1 100.000 100.000 500,0001 W000 600.0m SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 6.813,700 566,700 518,000 1 .000 2,240,000 I 2,235,000 350.000 5,997,000 250,000 6.247,000 REHAMLITATION PROJECTS 1.Eudld Trunk Manhole Rehab.2-34R 952,000 122.000 70,000 7MAW 30,000 830.000 830.000 2.South Sands Ana RW Trunk Easement,2.39 18,000 18.000 SUBTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 968.0D0 138,000 70,000 730,000 30,000 830.000 830,000 GRAND.TOTAL CAPITAL WMVEMENTS 14,555,700 1 768.700 763,000 3,181,000 6.370.000 10./6500 1 8,650,000 1 29,952.000 13.635AW 43,787.000 • Partigy funded by Other Distrtds \ ••Costs to be reimbursed by CalUans 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION 2.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION i County Sanitation District No. 3 Schedule of Dlstrlt t Collection System Projeeft, CAPITAL.IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F 0 H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST RED EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACITY 1.Artesia Branch Subtr nk Relief(3) 400,000 50.000 300,000 50.000 400.OW 400,000 2.West"Reed I teroeptor Parallel(3) 5,700,000 6.700,000 5.700,000 3.Wdstside Rebel Tnnk(3) 700,000 7W.000 700.000 4.Orange-Westem Subtnnk Robot Sewer,3.25(2) 1,207.000 57.000 100,000 1,000,000 50,000 1.150,000 1.150.000 S.Knott INT Robot.Orangelhorpe to Mesta(3) 3,300.000 100.000 1,500.000 1,500,000 3.100.000 200,0W 3.300.000 6.Hoover-Westem Subtnink Relief on Trask(3) 1,050.000 50,000 $00.000 500.000 1.050.000 1.050,000 7.Mil ter-Holder.Artesia to Hibsborough,3-38-1 12) 5,335,000 65.000 150,000 3.000,000 2.000.000 120,000 5.270.000 5.270.000 8.Mi w-Holder Improv.. Imperial Hwy.,3-38-3121 3.330.000 230.000 2.000.000 1,000,000 100,000 - 3,100,0W 3,100,000 9.Los Alamitos Stbtnnk Robot(3) 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 10.Magnolia Rebet Swr.Wstmin.-Trask,3-35R•1(1) 2,300,000 3W.000 1.11W.000 2W.000 •2,000,000 2.000.000 11.Sister Ave.Punp Station Roo.,11-17.1(1)'(12.1%) 1.230,000 1.228.000 10.000 10.0001 10,000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAP. 29,560,000 1.680.000 3.960.0001 4.200.000 2,400,000 3,120,000 2,100,000 16.080.000.1 11,600,000 27.680.000 GM 1.TKhMe Pipe Claim,3-36- 2,112.000 2,012,000 100,000 100,000 1110,000 2. 1-5 Freeway Wdentrq,3.37•"• 43,000 13.000 20,000 10.000 30,000 30.000 3.Robe Portion of Los Ahmios Subinnk,3-0-1 65.000 50.000 15.000 15.000 15,000 4.Pump Station improvements,2-37-(14%) 558.2W 5.200 84,000 54,000 199,000 159,000 553,000 653.000 S.MlKalleneous Pro)eds 1 1.000.000 100.000 100.0001 100.0001 100.000 1 100,000 500,000 600,000 1.000,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 3770.2001 2.080.2001 319.000 1 194.0001 296.000 2".W01 1W.000 I 1,19e,000 1 500,000 1 1,698,000 REHABILITATION PROJECTS 1.N,, , Sleet Tnnk Punk Rehab•(57.6%) (4) 500 000 500,000 500,000 2.Magnobs Tnnk Sewer Rehab.3-35R (2) 3.700.000 908.000 750.000 1,50Q000 550,000 2,9W.0W 2,8W.000 3.Said Beach Blvd Rehab.,3-11R 98.000 38.OW 20,000 40,000 60.000 60,000 SUB TOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 4.306.000 946,0W 770.DW 1,540,000 1 550,000 ZWO-000 00 5W.0 3,380,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL NPROVEMENTS 37.644.200 4.908.200 5,049,000 1 5,934.000 3.246.000 3.709.000 2,2W.000 20.1300 8.0 12,600,000 1 32.730.000 Pertisly knded by District No.11 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION -Cla-sniApped Pending 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN "•Partially Its by Other Districts 3 MASTER-PUNNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION '•'•Sub)ed to reYnbunemerd by CALTRANS 4.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN IL CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 5 Schedule of District Collection System Projects. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C O E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REQ EST REQ EST REQ EST REQ FIVE EST S YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCIAASES 1997.96 199&99 19W2000 200"1 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIINCREaSE r-�ACIiY 1.W.Coast Hwy Gravity Tnnk Rehab.5-27-2(20%) (1) 019.000 699,000 20.000 20.000 20.OW PUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. e19,000 599.000 20.OW 20,000 20.000 CAPITAL IMPROM MENTSA2ELIABILITY 1.Newport Blvd.3 PCH Wdeninp.5.41'(42%) 2W,000 20,000 1 tt0,000 20.000 180.000 180.000 2.Reloeellon of Lido Rump St•tlon.5-41-1"' 095,000 25.OW 225.000 575.000 70.OW e70,000 070,000 3.Pump Slams Improvement•.2-37"(28%) 1.110.400 10,4W 116e.0w 1e8.000 302.000 370.000 1.108.000 1,100.000 4.MI•odaneow Prged• 1 350.000 • 12sAM I .009I .000 2s,000I ,aoo .0001 125.0110 1 350.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIR9JABILITY 2.se1.1o0 55AW e70.000 1 709.01)(11 487.0001 403.0001 25.000 1 2.381.0001 125.0001 2.500.000 RIMABILITATION PROJECT 1.610 Canyon Tnnk RehabMtaOon(2) 2.000.000 50,000 900,000 1,000,00o so.000 2.000.000 2.000.0m 2.Baboo PerYnmb Rehab 5W.W0 - 000.000 SOOA00 SUBTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 2.500.000 50.000 900.000 1,000,000 50,000 2.000.000 500,0110 Z500,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 5.880.4W 654.400 698.000 838.000 1 1.387.000 1,403.000 75A00 4,401.000 e25.000 5,0Ie.000 •PadMNy l 11 by DMdd No.0 1.MASTER44 ANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION Partially Wded by 00w 0130 9 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION —Cosh pa0*•hued wdh C9y er Newpw I Beadl County Sanitation District No. 6 Schedule of District Collection system Projnb CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C 0 E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST S YEARS TEN COST TO 98- PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1907.08 1999 1998 2000 200"1 200t-02 YEAR TOTAL W02-2W7 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CHI 1.W.Coast Hwy Gmft Trunk Rehab.S-373(80%) (1) 2.478.000 2.308.000 00.000 80.000 80.000 2:Fadrvlew Rebel Baker St.toWlsan St..612(2) 3,145.000 380,000 1,000,000 1,700,000 385,000 3.08SA0D 3,085.00 3.Distrld 8 Tnnk Parelel(3) 1.325,000 25.000 300,000 1.000.0m 1,325.000 1.325.000 4.Dover Off"Tnnk Panne(3) 1,500.000 100.000 1.000.000 4W.000 1.5W.000 1.500.000 S.Colage Ave.P.S.Parallel F.M.(S%)"(2) 74.000 1,500 7.5W 85,000 72.5W 7&SW SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASB CAP. 0.020.0001 2.777,500 1 IFFAW I 1.085.000 I 1.825,000 I 1.885.000 1 1.400.000 1 8,042,500 I 8.042.500 CAPffA 1.Newport BM.&PCH Widening.5-41(S8%) 277.000 28.000 221.000 28.0W 249.000 249.000 2,Weison Ave/CaUomla Strati Sewer,8.13(2) 1.050.000 35.000 110.000 915.000 1,025A00 1.025.000 3.Wideakr8 04 94M Ovu Costa Mean 100.000 100.000 100.0m 4.Mlseelarreous Pro" 250,000 25,000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25,000 125.000 125.000 250,000 5.Pump Slanon Improvemer"2-37" 0%) 239.200 2.200 30.000 I 38,W0 1 84,0001 81.t100 I 237A00 1 237,000 SUBTOTAL CAP.(MPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 1.928.200 65.200 392.000 1.004,000 1 109,0001 100.0001 25.000 1,898,000 225,I100 1.881,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL(MPROVEMEHTII 10,746.200 2.842,7W 4T9.5W 2.059,000 1,934.000 1,771,000 1,425.000 7.670.500 225,000 7.903.500 • Partially funded by Dlsbid No.8 Pally funded by DIsM No.7 1.MASTER-I)LANHED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION Partially funded by Other Disbids 2.MASTER4)LAHNrEO FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 3.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 7 Schedule of Dhttict Collection System Proje- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997.98 1996-99 IM2000 2000.01 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACRY 1.OnKW Peck Aaes Tnnk ReptoWnent.7-17(2) 821.000 37.000 50.000 800.000 134.000 784,000 784.000 2.Tusm Air Base Facilities (3) 51750.000 150.000 2.000.000 3.900.000 500.000 100.000 • 5.750.000 6.750,000 3.NoM Tnmk Replacement(3) 2,850.000 50.000 1.400.000 1.000.000 2.450.000 200.000 2,650,000 4. Gisler-Red Hit Interceptor(3) 3.300.000 300,000 300.000 6,000,000 5.300.000 5.Red Hit Interceptor Parallel(3) 1.400.000 1,400.000 1.400,000 8.Lemon Helgtds Sewer Repkcemard, 7-22.1/2(3) 6.414.000 1,864.000 550.000 2.000,000 2,550,000 1.000.000 3.550.000 7.Browning Tnnk Replaoment(3) 850.000 850.000 850.000 S.College Ave PS Parallel Force Maln,7-23.1(95%)-(2) 1.405,000 27.000 143,000 1.233.000 1,378.000 1.378.000 9.Improvements to Main St.P.S..7.7-1(25%)'(2) 967,000 217,000 850.o00 100.000 750.000 750.000 to.Main$1.Pump Station ExImalon.7.7.2(28%)•(3) 775,000 775.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 25.332,Oo0 2.145.000 993,000 1 3.935.0001 3.464.0001 2.450.0001 3./00.000 13.982.000 e,4s0,000 22.412.000 775.000 1.Pump Station knprovements.2-37 (33%1-(3) 1.315.200 12.200 198,000 198.000 482.000 443.000 1.303J= 1.303,000 2.Pump Station Abandonowd.1.14-3 (3) 425.000 75.000 200.000 150.000 425.000 425.000 3.Miscelaneoto Pro)eds 500,000 50,000 $0.000 50.000 50,000 50.000 250.000 250.000 500.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSPSOBIUTY 2.240.200 12.200 248.0001 323.0001 712.000 1 645.000 50,000 1.978,000 1 250.000 1 2.228,000 -0N PROJECTS 1.smdbww Uw*wb Ratub.7-21 (70%)••(3) 308.000 1.000 70.000 155.000 50,000 305.000 305,000 2,Mlsoelaneous Repair of load Sewer (4) 5.600.000 100,000 1,200.000 1.200.000 1,200.000 1.200.000 4.000.000 700.000 5.600.000 SUBTOTAL RBIABIUTATION PROJECTS 5.906,000 1.000 1 100,000 1.270.001) 1.385.000 1,250.000 1.20(1.000 5.205.001) 700,000 5.905.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPfTAL IMPROVEMENTS L.33.478.2001 2.158.200 1.341.000 1 5.520.000 5.561,000 4,345.000 4.350.000 21.115J)00 9,400,000 1 30,545.000 775.0o0 • Pertlay 8arded by DWM No.14 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY LINDER CONSTRUCTION ••Palely funded by DI*Id No.1 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN ~•Palely Lorded by Distdd No.8 3.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION ....Poly*coded by Dow D 4.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN 6 CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. II Schedule of Dletrtct ColleWOn System Prol", CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A e C D E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARSE205.000 EST REO EST REO EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES1888-88 1999.2000 2000-01 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAPACITY 1.Slater Ave.Pump Station Repl..11-17-10)•(87.6%) 6.520.000 8.450.000 70,000 70.000 2.Goldenwesl SL Server Replaoenwd.11-17-2 (1) 2.720.000 44.000 500.000 2.000.000 50.000 2.885.0W 2.885.000 3.Slater Ave.Reiler(2) 1,TW.OW - 1.TW.OW 1.700.000 4.Hall interceptor(2) 3.150.000 150.000 3,000,000 3.150.000 3.150,000 5.Slater/Sprlogdale Re0s,N q 1(2) 800,000 8KOW 800,000 8.Warner Ave Sewer Relef(2) 1.Wo,000 1,500.000 1,500,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAP. 18.400.000 6.495.000 500.000 2,000.OW 200.0W 3.000.000 5.905.000 4.000.0001 O.W5.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILIT]t 1.1 at"an Ouch Purchase ADand.11-18(2) 325.000 75.OW 250.0W 325.000 325.000 2.Pump StaBon trnprovernerb.2-77(9%)"(2) 356.300 3.300 54.OW 54,000 126.000 121.000 35SOM 355,000 3.Mlsoeseneow Projects 500.000 150.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 350.000 250.000 000.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIREU 00 ABILITY 1.283.3 3,3W 279.000 354.000 178.000 171,000 50.000 1,030,000 250.000 1.280.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 17,863.300 8,498.3'W 484.000 854.000 2.178.000 371.000 3.050.000 0.935.000 4.250.OW 11.185.000 • Partially haled by Otstrld No.3 PaNeOy funded by Other Distrids 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRICTION County Sanitation District No. 14 Schedule of DlsMct Collection System Project*;'; CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A 8 C 0 E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN ni PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997.98 1998.99 1999.2000 2000.01 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMEW151INCREASE CAPACITY I.Improvemerds to Mah SL P.S..7.7-1(72%)-(1) 2,120,000 195.001) 1.575,000 250.000 1.025.000 1,925.000 2.Mehi Street Pump RaOon Ejoenam.7.7-2(72%)—M 2.000.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAP. /.120,0D0 195,000 1.Lt16.000 250.000 1.925.000 .1.925.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRHIABILITY 1, up%%de 250.000 25.000 25,000 25.OW 25.000 25.000 125,000 125.000 250A00 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRQ1ABI ITY 250.000 25.000 25.000 25,000 25.000 25.000 125A00 125.000 250.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL G4PRONEMEIg9 1,370.000 19S,000 75.0001 25.000 1 25.000 1 25.000 2.050.000 1251M 2.175.000 2 00Q000 • Peft ft&xWW by Dlddd No.7 ~Future consmwoon now 2020.puddy howled by 0.7 1.MASTER41ANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION i RESOLUTION NO. 97-33-5 INITIATING PROPOSAL TO CONSOLIDATE DISTRICTS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 APPLYING TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 56000, ET SEQ. WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts were originally formed and organized in 1947-48 as separate districts providing sewer services, generally following the drainage patterns of Orange County; and, WHEREAS, Orange County's sewer system is now well-established, and the current main focus of the nine districts is on joint projects and the attendant regulatory issues; and, WHEREAS, over the years, the continuation of the nine districts as separate entities has contributed to certain administrative and financial burdens; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Part 3 of Division 3 of Title 5 of the Government Code, known as the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 ("the Act"), certain local agencies may make request to the Local Agency Formation Commission for a change of organization or a reorganization; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 5 is a local agency authorized to make such a proposal; and, f M WHEREAS, "consolidation" is one type of change of organization or ' reorganization permitted by the Act, defined as the uniting or joining of two or more districts, formed pursuant to the same principal act, into a single new successor'district; and, WHEREAS, notice of intent to adopt this resolution of application has not been given to each interested and each subject agency as is permitted, but not required by Government Code Section 56800(b); and, WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be consolidated is inhabited; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of streamlining administration and Board procedures, maintaining financial and other records, and reducing costs, it has been determined by the District that the proposed consolidation will effect substantial administrative benefits and financial savings, both individually and collectively. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: This proposal for a change of organization is made pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 2: The change of organization proposed herein is the consolidation of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 into a single County Sanitation District, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. r ' Section 3: The boundaries of the affected nine districts are as depicted in Exhibit "A", attached. The boundaries of the proposed consolidated district are as depicted in Exhibit "B", attached. Section 4: Terms and conditions of the proposed consolidation regarding consolidation of assets and financial obligations are set forth on Exhibit "C", attached. Section 5: The number and method of selection of members of the governing Board shall be as provided in California Government Code Section 4730.65. Section 6: The following person is to be furnished with copies of the report by the Executive Officer and to be given mailed notice of the hearing on the proposal: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Section 7: This proposal is to be considered a formal request that proceedings for consolidation be taken pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 8: A plan for providing services within the affected territory is attached as Exhibit "D". Section 9: The effective date of the consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 24, 1997. H:1wp.dta\admin\BS\R ES\R ES97197-33-5.doc r STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, PENNY KYLE, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97-33-5 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board on the 24th day of September, 1997, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Jan Debay, Chair; John Noyes NOES: William G. Steiner ABSENT: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, this 24th day of September, 1997. i Penny Kyle, cr ry Board of Directors of Co qr y,Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, Ca!ifor.nia- \UeadWata2lwp.dtaladmin\BS\FORMSl971F13.033.5.doe �' t EXHIBIT A— Map of Current Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 3, WNIrnER a vD LA HABRA 9gti 9F9� LAMBERT RO IM►ERIAL MWY 11 G BREA C, G BASTANCNURY to L FITON VORSA LINDA BLVD YALYERN YORBA CNA►YAM AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� ORANDETW AVB �5 UENA I L �.. LA PARK PALM UNQ7LN AVE r, ANAHEIM a VILLA iC BALLRD CYPRE S I W TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON $ LAMITOS O F RAN E k W Y tl tl CN W A/YAM AVB 2 tl GARDEN r GRO STMINSTE S I I MRSTMINSTER IAVE 1Ti11 ST B 1 TUS , MCI Doem ST 'W o SANT W ANA WARNER AVE I � 8 F:)UNTAtIii ? t Etus Ave ALLEY HUN IN N EAC ADAMS A G 9 g O PACIFIC AMILTONAVG COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE O J NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS <wwwu OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC t/95 r EXHIBIT B —Map of Proposed Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY s wNIT all eivo 0,9 1+ ln 9 LA HABRA LAMEERT PO IMIERIAI HWY gN"R NE EA SASTA RY RO L ON `'ORE"'UNOA EIVO _ MALVERN YORBA `""'""NAVE LACENTIA LINDA oRAI enro Ave .�5 LA � A A K PALMA LINCOLN I ANAHEIM VILLA rD �° E„uROI CYPRESS 1 LOS STANTON TA AVE PARK LAMITOS RANGE 2 S > >< C CNAIMAN AV9 =I » GARDEN GRO _JVNSTMIII STE Sn«NsrERIAVE ,TrN sr I S s we B < 1 TUS MC R EN ST 1: g SANT W o ANA WARNER AVE i 8 FOUNTA o E1uSA.._VALLEY I HUN INGT N I `P �Fqo ° ROAMS AVE G hF .PACIFIC AWT"NAVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE P P4' ' NEW PORT BEACH N N • I •••NO/YY• SRVM-CLR.CDR CSOOC 1/95 i • Exhibit C LAFCO Application Terms & Conditions Consolidation of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1. The nine separate districts known jointly as the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ("CSDOC") shall be consolidated into one single county sanitation district pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code Sections 4730 et seq.) and shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County ("District"). [G.C. §56844(v)] (As used herein, "CSDOC" refers to the nine Districts, both jointly, singly and in any combination.) 2. As a result of consolidating, the nine existing districts shall be dissolved and be reorganized as one consolidated District with one consolidated Board of Directors under California Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. At the time of consolidation, the Board of Directors would include representatives from the following jurisdictions: [G.C. §56844(n)] • County (1) - County of Orange Unincorporated Area • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Santa Ana Buena Park La Habra Seal Beach Cypress La Palma Stanton Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Tustin Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District 3. Directors of District shall be compensated in accordance with applicable state law. Pagel Y • 4. All system facilities shall be transferred from existing CSDOC to District as of the effective date of consolidation in an "as-is" condition, without any payment or repair obligation from CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(k)(v)] 5. All lands, buildings, real and personal property, assets and appurtenances held by CSDOC, as of the effective date of the consolidation, shall be transferred to District. Such assets are enumerated in the CSDOC Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ending June 30, 1997. [G.C. §56844(b)] 6. District shall be designated as the successor to CSDOC and retain all of the rights, duties and obligations of the former CSDOC with respect to enforcement, performance or payment of any outstanding bonds, contracts or obligations of the former CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(m)] 7. All previously authorized charges, fees assessments and/or taxes currently in effect by CSDOC shall be continued by District. [G.C. §56844(t)] 8. The establishment of Special Zones within District, pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 4850 et seq., shall be effected on July 1, 1998 and shall collectively include any or all portions of the entire CSDOC service area and individually include the specified areas as shown on the nine attached maps. The existing rate schedules within each of the Special Zones shall continue as presently in effect by each District within CSDOC until such time as amended by the District's Board of Directors. The annual sewer service charge can only be amended by a vote of two-thirds of all members of the governing body. [G.C. §56844(e)] 9. All agreements by and between any two or more existing CSDOC's, including but not limited to: joint sewer ownership or use, construction or maintenance of facilities, shall be terminated upon the effective date of the consolidation. The termination of the agreements is appropriate in recognition of the new District assuming full and exclusive ownership and authority over all rights, duties and obligations of all existing CSDOC's. 10. To the extent not inconsistent with the terms of the consolidation, and as necessary to carry out the original intent, all contracts between the Irvine Ranch Water District and one or more existing CSDOC's, including those relating to ownership of capacity rights in treatment, disposal and sewer facilities, shall be assigned to District and remain in full force and effect. All contracts between County Sanitation District No. 14 and one or more Page 2 CSDOC's shall also be assigned to the new District and remain in full force and effect. 11. CSDOC shall transfer any and all indebtedness and the obligation to levy taxes, charges, assessments, or fees in order to make payment of said indebtedness to District. [G.C. §56844(c)] 12. CSDOC shall file a statement with LAFCO that the reorganization shall not adversely affect or impair the status of any employee of CSDOC or District. As of the effective date of this reorganization, all employees of CSDOC shall become employees of District. Rates of pay, accrued vacation and sick leave, vacation and sick leave accrual rates, employee rights, insurance, retirement benefits, and all other benefits and programs shall be transferred over to District at then-current levels. Memoranda of Understanding in place under CSDOC shall be transferred to the new District. [G.C. §56844(I)] 13. Permits issued to CSDOC by any federal, state or local regulatory authority, shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties as contained within the permits and to continue operations without interruption. Such permits shall include but not be limited to: CSDOC's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit, including a waiver for full secondary treatment pursuant to Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act, and all other air and land permits. [G.C. §56844(v)] 14. Permits issued by CSDOC shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties contained in said permits and in the laws authorizing the issuance of said permits. Such permits shall include but not be limited to Sewer Connection Permits and Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permits. [G.C. §56844(c)] 15. District shall assume all existing contracts and obligations presently in full force and effect with CSDOC and which have not otherwise been specifically referenced herein. [G.C. §56844(m)] 16. The effective date of this consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. [G.C. §56844(p)] Page 3 Map of Special Zone I LOS ANGELES COUNTY 41 WHIrnER BLVD 14, LA HABRA L'A A BERT RD r IMPERIAL HWY .B EA OG BASTAN HURY L ON YORSA LINDA BLVD 13 MALVERN CHAP N AVE YORBA @ LACENTIA LINDA OM eTHO AVE I 2 UE Ali,, LA PA K PALM AI LIN IN AV ANAHEIM RAU RD CY6ESS VILLA 0 TA VE PARK LOS STANTON LAMITOS O I RAN,E x 0 CHAPMAN AVE x �-JGAR 4N GR KsTmI S SE WESTMI14STEFI AVE .......... us A S QJ ........... ....... ............ ........... FDUNTA JE SAYEALLEY .... HUN IN FACJ4 IADAMSAVII O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE 5 g. NEWPORT BEACH COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SFtVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY LS wNIrnER BwD 9� LA HABRAne�'9A- UMBERT RO -r�9Ow- IMPERIAL NWV V OG /'✓O B EA . BA$, L ON Vm0A&A LWDA BLVD MALVERN YOR6A 13 cNAPMAN AVE LACENT. LIN-DA 4�� J� ORA ETNO AVE ' ��GO LA U E A ; c0 PA K PALM u LN AV CO ANAHEIM ALL BALL RD CY RE S A . ;PARK LOS W N STANTO LAMITOS _ ::::»a:::<:::;'<:<:>;: >>::RAN. E>»>: >:< y W =� Y m CNA►MAN AV 3 iGAR13 � STMI S SE WESTMINSTER VE I.,.ST B Y W 7 J m O Tus s � Me P DEN sT 11 g SANT w m ANA WARNER AVE i 8 F D UNTA a 1 E VS AVE ALLEY ,�� •ry�c��rFq `!r�! HUN INGTON EAQJ ADAMSAVO O PACIFIC MILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE 5 NEWPORT BEACH' N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 3 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 3, ..:.'�W187T1ERBLVO:i. 6 LA HABRA; LAMesRTRo FC 9� ,.INPERNI B EA OG"A►_J� BASTAN NURY >' YORBA LINOA BLVO L ON YORBA 13 MALVERN-.: CNAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA J� oru er►a Ave 2 r-j O Ue a PALM ti PA K 5 ANAHElm W VILLA db auiro CY..:RE. S......::.......1:..... ° T AVE PARK X. LAMRO s RAN E m a o e m m J Q �V a: GRO S7Mt SE WEsrMpracEttYQ:> iTM st B 7 Y x u 3` i. .�'. 1 O TUS 11 < >O O= <:m, :;,;;:, ANA WARNER AVE a HUN NGTN > »< ><> AQ Auw PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA ,� IRVINE ONEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' craw rw OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 5 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, wNITTIER BLVD On 9-re� LA HABRA LAMBERT RD IMPERIAL NWY VV CO(i1,°'HOC B EA BASTAN NURY L ON YORBA UNDA BLVD MAWERN YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 92� OJt]� OM 14ETH0, AVE I 2 9s�O I C7LA G UE A O PALMA U PA K 5 ANAHEIM ; VILLA O �O BALL RD CY RE S 1 TA VE PARK LOS STANTON g N LAMITOS O I RAN,E 12- a S m ¢ J S > Y e CIIAPMAN AVB z c ���� GAR D N GRO STMI S S WESTWNSTER VE 17T11 Sr B ° O 7 TUS � m MCP N ST ,'9ytY 11 g SANT X. W m ANA WARNER AVE J 8J F UNTA o Ei US AVE IALLEY ,V FC H UN ING N ADAMS A 4J O9 gr O PACIFIC COST OCEAN MESA �° IRVINE %'`;::>; NEWPORT:' N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' egAor rw OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 ° Map of Special Zone 6 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, wNIrnER B VO LA HABRA 9'�ti 6F9� LAMBERT RD CF '99 IMPERIAL NWT CO(�ti O/HOC B// EA OG BASTANENURV RD VORBA LINOA BLVD O WERN L ON YORBA 13 MA CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'`�, � 9s OM 4GETH40,, AVE I 2 �O�O �5 UE A �., LA PA PALM LAN K 5 ANAHEIM o VILLA rD BALL RD Cy RE S I TA VE PARK LOS STANTON \-,0LAMITOS zOoRAN E a > Y o CNAPMAN AVE S W CARD N GRO STMI S S WESTMINSTER VE Irrm ST 7 8 V 1 u < Oe TUS � MC F DDEN ST ti g SANT W O ANA WARNER AVE J 8 F UNTA r` 1 E 11SAVE ALLEY `� � itiFc�Nr�9O 6T�' HUN IN N EAC ADAMS A 9 gr PACIFIC AMILTON AVE OCEAN COST. . _.:;::, IRVINE e� O5 , NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 7 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ------__EtLrnER BLVD LA HABRA LAMBERT RD IMPERIAL HWY Ile B EA BASTA HURY YORRA LINDA BLVD MALVERN ON YORBA CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA OM ETNO AVE 2 UE A LA PA K PALM A uN LN AV Qg l I S ANA EIM BALL R' CYPRES VILLA dD TA PARK LOS STANTON LAMITOS 'z O s RANGE z Ri x ......................................................... ........I................. ............................................................%..... ................................. GARDEN .......... GRO TMI S .................. SE WESTbmum I rrm sr a: ............... MC FADDEN ST x gSANTA ANA WARNER AVE ........... .......... ............................. .............. F UNTA ................... ..................... ... ................ ....................... .......... ......... ........................ E SAVE ALLEY ................ FC .................. ............... ...................................... .......I.........I................. ..................................... HUN IN N ADAMS AV4 ............ O LJ PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN ESA IRVINE 5 NEWPORT BEACH COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR .. CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 11 LOS ANGELES COUNTY wNIrnER ELvo LA HABRA LAMBERT RD IMPERIAL N W V CQ�jw-O/"✓QC B EA BASTAN NURY VORBA LINDA BLVD O MALVERN L ON YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA �'L. OJT oRA►aETNo AVE 2 i O ���G LA UE A �cm PALM �N PA K 5 ANAHEIM a VILLA dD BALLAD CY RE S I TA VE PARK LOS STANTON $ LAMITOS K O I m RAN E b1f W > Y CHAPMAN AV S u �{ GARD N GRO STMI S SE wwwNSTER VE 17TN ST C B ` O TUS MC F ANA :•'`' i'^'!< m WARNER AVE SAN F UNTA E G AVE ALLEY H:N: NG r.(IN 0 ADAMS AYI6� yr O PACIFIC ""' dN"v COST OCEAN MESA �° IRVINE �11 5 ' NEWPORT BEACH ' N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 13 LOS ANGELES COUNTY WtrnER BLVD Q q-Ye LA HABRA 9q�'O �9'I9n LAMBERT RD �e •'O IMPERIAL NWV G �O� B EA OG BASTAN MUM VORSA LINDA BLVD L ON MALVERN YORBA _ ,9 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA ORA ETNO AVE 7-1 J 2 0 0 G 5 LI E A ., LA PALM u PA K °> 5� ANAHEIM IW BALL Ro CY RE S a VILLA <>: TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON m RAN E a LAMITOS > a < J 3 > Y e CNA►MAN ANI z y q �� GARDEN GRO STMI S SE wESTMINSTER i%VE 1TTM ST B u 7 W u m O TUS O MC F OEM ST g SANT W m ANA WARNER AVE J , 8 F UNTA s 1 E US AVE ALLEY ° , ,g ,DPP '�Fc�~rF9 O' it HUN,TINGTGN , c9 FCT EACH ADAMSAV8O g O PACIFIC A►BLTONAVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE 5 ''P NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �6M!W YW OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, WNIrnER BLVD Qn q�en LA HABRA LAMBERT RO V� •r9'7 IMPERIAL HWV C�Gw.O/"L'OC B EA Yry OG,1,� BASTAN NURY YORBA LINDA BLVD O MALVERN L ON YORBA 13 CNAPMANAVE LACENTIA LINDA 9s, OJ`1� ORAI ETNO a AVE j Z /O C i �\�G LA U Ep A I O c� PALMA LI PAVEIK ANAHEIM g VILLA rp BALLAD CYPRE S I W TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON 3 LAMITOS C O S RAN E R W O �! ¢ a > x u CNAPMAN AVB i vWi ...... . .. .............. e �y 3 ........... o � CARD N D GRO STMI S S WESTMINSTER VE 'M Sr B W 7 u 1 O us � MC PADDEN Sr r S 11 � g SANT 0 m ANA WARNER A W VE J r 8 NTA \ F U A P 1 E�L13 AVE LLEY iiii:iiiiii Y:i;l%i;?i i';c3i'i ;iii (� HUN� IN G N EAC AaMs AVd O 6 PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COSTA V J tRVtNE......:...... MESA a e P o rP NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �eAu a rw OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Exhibit D Plan of Services for the Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County L INTRODUCTION This Plan of Services has been prepared pursuant to Govemment Code Section 56653, which requires that a plan for providing services within the affected territory be provided whenever an application for a change of organization is submitted to LAFCO. This document will facilitate the consolidation of the nine (9) existing County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) into one single County Sanitation District pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq. The resulting consolidated agency shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County (District). This consolidation proposes a transfer of all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of CSDOC to the District. The Plan of Services provides a description of CSDOC and its operations and how they will be consolidated as the District. IL DESCRIPTION OF CSDOC A. General Information The CSDOC is made up of nine independent special districts. Each district is a political subdivision of the State of California and is governed by a representative of each city and sanitary district within the district and, if the District includes unincorporated territory, a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Each district has its own budget. All districts except District Nos. 13 and 14 have their own tax rate and trunk sewer systems. District No. 13 buys capacity in the other districts' transmission facilities. A Joint Administrative Organization was formed in 1948 to administer the business of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities and the activities common to all districts. This is provided for in a Joint Ownership Operation and Construction Agreement. The day-to-day operation of the organization is under the direction of a General Manager, one assistant general manager, eight department heads, for an authorized staff of 560 full time equivalents for the Fiscal Year 1997-98. B. Types of Services, Level, and Range of Service Currently Provided The CSDOC is a single-purpose public entity formed solely for the collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater and its residuals and serves the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal needs of approximately 2.2 million people. During 1996-1997, an average daily sewage influent flow of 244 million gallons per day (MGD) was treated and 510 wet tons per day of residual solids (biosolids) was produced. CSDOC encompasses a 470 square-mile area of Orange County that includes 23 of the County's 31 cities. CSDOC operates the third largest wastewater management agency of its kind west of the Mississippi, with assets valued at more than $1 billion dollars. The nine individual districts own about 650 miles of major trunk sewers, 22 pumping stations and two major treatment plants with disposal facilities to safely discharge the treated effluent through an ocean outfall into deep ocean waters. The treatment plants process an average of 244 million gallons of wastewater per day. Page 1 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley. It has a current operational primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 108 MGD and a secondary treatment capacity of 66 MGD currently being expanded to 80 MGD. Treatment Plant No. 2 is in Huntington Beach. It has a primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 186 MGD. Plant No. 2 provides advanced primary treatment to all of the wastewater that enters the plant and secondary treatment to up to 90 MGD of the total flow. Table 1 highlights the service area characteristics and system features. Table 1 Service Area Joint Works Facilities -As of June 30, 1997 Total Population Served (estimated) 2,275,000 Service Area (estimated) 470 square miles Total Number of Cities Served 23 Total Miles of Trunk Sewers 650 Number of Pumping Stations 22 Number of Treatment Plants 2 Primary Treatment Capacity (includes standby) Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 Total Primary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 MGD Secondary Treatment Capacity Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 Total Secondary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . 156 MGD Total Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450 MGD Reported Average Daily Flow Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 MGD Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 MGD Total Average Daily Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 MGD Page 2 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service C. Description of Sanitary Sewer System CSDOC processes wastewater from the collection systems of the various cities, water districts and local sewer agencies. They do not deal directly with individual customers except for portions of District No. 7,which is located primarily in unincorporated territory of the County near Tustin. CSDOC's assets consist of individual district assets and each district's respective share of jointly owned assets. Table 2 summarizes the respective District ownership in jointly owned and separately owned property, plant, equipment and construction in progress, at cost, as of June 30, 1997: Table 2 District Ownership Jointly Owned Separately Owned Total Total property, plant and equipment $804,200,000 $321,300,000 $1,135,500,000 Less accumulated $310,200.000 depreciation Net property, plant and equipment $825,300,000 D. Additional Assets In addition to its real property and facilities, CSDOC owns service vehicles, equipment, tools, repair parts inventory, and communications and office equipment. CSDOC maintains cash, liquid securities to meet its cash flow requirements, and other reserves. The following table summarizes the districts' reserves budgeted for the end of Fiscal Year 1996-97. Table 3 Reserves Analysis "Dry Period" Operating Cash Flow $28,021,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,221,000 Debt Service Reserves Fund Balance 59,724,000 Capital Reserves 49,233,000 Environmental Requirements Reserves 4,484,000 Flood/Earthquake Insurance Reserves 81,450,000 Rate Stabilization Funds 141,200,000 Total $375,333,000 Page 3 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service E. Liabilities As of June 30, 1997, CSDOC liabilities included debt in the amount of approximately $397,575,000. These issues include $397,45,000 of Certificates of Participation (COP) and $30,000 of general obligation (G.O.) bonds. The Districts have maintained their AA- rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and Aa rating from Moody's Investor Services, although all COP issues are backed by issuance of letters of credit and are rated AAA. The Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget provides for$32,620,000 to service the debt on the various COPs issued. In addition, there is a $15,000 annual payment to maturity in January 1999 for the G.O. bonds in District No. 1 1. Consolidation of the districts will have no impact on the liabilities of CSDOC. Under consolidation into a single County Sanitation District, the new County Sanitation District assessments all predecessor district obligations. Further, the districts are presently joined by agreement to manage and fund liabilities. The new consolidated District will establish special zones upon consolidation to continue differential user fees and to ensure that predecessor districts' outstanding debt is serviced by only those residents who originally assumed that debt. The boundaries of each zone will be the same as those of each predecessor district. The new consolidated District will establish nine (9) zones to differentiate and account for costs, revenues and liabilities of the existing districts. In addition, an Improvement District (ID) could be formed coincident with each predecessor district's service area to enable proper segregated accounting for the retirement of the existing Certificates of Participation (COPS) debt. As new future borrowing may occur, new ID's would be formed to include the service area benefiting from the projects. Such new ID's would not necessarily have boundaries congruent with the zones. For projects at the treatment plants, however, an ID to include all of the new District's service area could be formed to properly allocate the cost of such improvements that would benefit all the zones. It is also expected that the consolidated District would continue the practice of dedicating Ad Valorem Taxes where it would be collectable within a zone to the retirement of long-term debt of an appropriate ID. F. Management and Employees CSDOC presently operates in a consolidated fashion pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code Section 4840 et seq. CSDOC currently employs approximately 560 full-time employees. Legal Services are provided by the law firm of Woodruff, Spradlin and Smart auditing services are also provided by contract. In addition, various other services are contracted-out. These include such varied services as groundskeeping, environmental review, ocean research and reporting, etc. CSDOC's organization chart is included in CSDOC's Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget which is submitted along with this application. The existing net joint operation budget for Fiscal Year 1997-98 is $46,922,650. Consolidation of the districts into a single District would result in the continuation of management and operational structures and functional expenditures similar to those described above. Operations of the new District would remain the same as the current operations of CSDOC. Consequently, there would be no change in employee compensation and employee benefits as adjustments would not be required. The transition from the existing joint operation to a single District operation would have no impact on employees, their occupational status, or their benefits. Page 4 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service G. Rates and Charges Each district, except District No. 14, has an adopted Sanitary Sewer Service Fee to provide funding for operating the sewer systems in accordance with the Clean Water Act and CSDOC's Revenue Program. District No. 14 is funded through the payment of an annual charge by the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) directly to CSDOC. IRWD levies and collects individual user charges from each parcel receiving service. Sanitary Sewer Service Fees are set annually by each district after a review of projected needs. In May, 1997, The Board of Directors adopted a user rate increase fee schedule that provides for gradual rate increase over the next five years for six of the nine districts. This represents that first user rate increase in seven years. The Districts have been able to avoid user fee increases by reducing operational costs through reorganizing and streamlining Districts operations, holding vacant positions open, and deferring new facilities. However, because the Districts' capital improvement program's debt service obligations continued to increase beyond the level of its primary funding source, i.e. property tax revenues, and because of the additional capital improvement requirements, increase in user fees became inevitable. The following is the adopted Annual Sewer Service Fee Rate Schedule District 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 1 $91.36 $100.27 $110.04 $120.77 $132.55 2 $73.00 $75.00 $77.00 $80.00 $82.00 3 $75.00 $76.00 $77.00 $78.00 $80.00 5 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 6 $78.00 $80.00 $82.00 $84.00 $86.00 7 $55.00 $60.00 $66.00 $73.00 $80.00 11 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 $101.25 $113.91 13 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 As was indicated previously, establishment of special zones upon consolidation would continue the existing schedules of differential Sanitary Sewer Service Fees until such time as amended by action of the governing body. Said fees shall not be amended without a two- thirds vote of all members of the governing body. Consolidation is expected to facilitate reorganizing and streamlining the new District's operations. H. Summary of Revenues and Expenses The CSDOC Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget, which is included in this application package, contains detailed information regarding revenues and expenses. Attention is called to Section 3, pages 1-13, of the Budget document for summary information. 111. DESCRIPTION OF THE CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT A. General Page 5 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service The nine independent County Sanitation Districts currently collectively known as CSDOC, and which utilize joint operating,working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, will be consolidated into a single County Sanitation District pursuant to the California County Sanitation District Act (Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq.). The boundaries of the consolidated District will be the same as the outer boundaries of those nine predecessor districts. B. Types of Services, Level and Range of Services The new District will assume all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of the former CSDOC. The District will own and operate the wastewater treatment system which provides sewage collection, treatment and disposal services currently owned and operated by the nine (9) Sanitation Districts known jointly as CSDOC. C. District Structure The District' s organization will be the same as that structure which presently exists under the CSDOC joint operating agreement for the operation and administration of the joint facilities. D. Governing Board Composition The new District will be formed under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65. Under Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65, the governing body of the consolidated District would be made up of a 25-member board representing local cities, sanitary districts and the County of Orange unincorporated area. Board membership would decrease from 29 to 25 with the loss of double representation for the Cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Yorba Linda and the County of Orange. The proposed governing Board formed under Section 4730.65 would include the following agencies: • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Tustin Buena Park La Habra Santa Ana Cypress La Palma Seal Beach Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Stanton Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District • County (1) -County of Orange (to represent the Unincorporated Areas) Page 6 ` CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service E. Three Year Budget of the Consolidated District It is anticipated that revenues and expenditures which would have been budgeted by CSDOC for the operation and administration of joint facilities and the construction of capital improvements will be the basis for the new District's financial plan. Attachment A is a 3-year projection of the District's budget under consolidation. The projection covers Fiscal Years 1998-99, 1999-2000 and 2000-2001. Attachment B is a summary of anticipated capital improvements for the new District. This summary of capital needs was derived from CSDOC's Joint Works Capital Improvements Budget. N. IMPACTS ON CUSTOMERS There will be no negative financial impact on customers. No rate changes are anticipated as a result of the consolidation. Please refer to previous discussion regarding the formation of special zones. V. IMPACTS ON OTHER JURISDICTIONS There will be no service level impacts on any of the cities, sanitary districts, and other agencies presently relying on services provided by CSDOC as the services responsibilities, without modification, will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Effective date is proposed as July 1, 1998. V1. IMPACTS ON REGIONAL PARTICIPATION All CSDOC's contractual obligations will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Accordingly, there are no anticipated impacts. Page 7 915197 r Consolidated Sanitation Distrct of Orange County Proiected Budgets Fiscal Years 1998-99 Thru 2000-01 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 Revenues Industrial/Commercial Use Fees $ 9,317,000 $ 10,714,000 $ 12,322,000 Sewer Service Fees 65,938,000 68,907,000 72,436,000 Fees From Other Agencies 6,150,000 4,700,000 5,250,000 Connection Fees 6,784,000 81065,000 9,727,000 Interest 22,443,000 22,420,000 21,749,000 Miscellaneous &Other 2,640,500 4,141,500 4,141,500 Property Taxes 30,572,000 30,565,000 30,562,000 New COP Issues 53,200,000 57,000,000 62,400,000 Total Revenues $ 197,044,500 $ 206,512,500 $ 218,587,500 Requirements Collection System O&M Expenses $ 9,553,000 $ 10,804,000 $ 10,527,000 Treatment System O&M Expenses 47,861,000 48,818,000 49,794,000 Collection System Improvements 20,997,000 24,902,000 216,497,000 Treatment System Improvements 70,086,000 78,429,500 96,380,500 GO Bond Principal&Interest 16,000 16,000 - Costs of New COP Issuance 2,660,000 2,850,000 3,120,000 COP Service &Retirement 37,772,000 42,590,000 47,834,000 Total Expenses $ 188,945,000 $ 208,409,500 $ 234,152,500 Revenue Exceeding Expenses $ 8,099,500 $ (1,897,000) $ (15,565,000) Beginning Cash Balances 385,031,450 393,130,950 391,233,950 Ending Cash Balances $ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,668,950 Appropriations, Dedications & Reserves "Dry Period"Operating Cash Flow $ 28,800,000 $ 30,121,000 $ 30,737,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,483,000 11,925,000 12,064,000 Capital Projects Completion 49,995,000 49,946,200 49,540,100 Environmental Requirements Reserve 4,634,000 4,484,000 4,484,000 Required Debt&COP Service Reserves 38,359,000 41,133,000 44,230,000 "Dry Period"COP Service Cash Flow 27,705,350 31,244,600 35,022,350 Property & Uability Catastrophe Reserve 89,752,850 90,971,850 91,208,250 Rate Stabilization Funds 142,401,750 131,408,300 108,383,250 •$ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,668,950 Unappropriated Cash &Investment Balances $ - $ - $ - County Sanitation District No. 1 Schedule of ObMd Colbetlon System Ptojgds CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A e C D E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST RED EST RED EST REG EST RED FIVE EST S YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1097.98 IOM99 1999.20M 2000-01 2MI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 1.MIndanown PraleM 250,000 2S.0W 25.000 25,000 25,000 23.000 123,000 125,000 230,000 ,SUB-TOTAL CAP.DAMOVEMEW94 ELLAB UTY 250.000 23,000 25.000 25.W1) 25.000 25.000 123,000 123,000 250.000 REHABILITATION PROJECTS 1.Saida Ms Tnwk Sewer Rehab.11) 6.300,000 75.000 75,000 6,225,000 6.300.000 2.Sun6oww Mara Rehab.(1)7.21'(SOIL) 140.000 30,000 e0,000 30.000 140.001) 140.000 3.Dyar Road Manhofa Rehab.(1) 330,000 50,000 200.000 100.000 350.000 350.000 4.MaYrDyer MenheN Rehab.(1) 350.000 50.000 100,000 150.000 200.000 350.000 S.Greanv*sSuAvan Manhde Rehab.(1) 200,000 50.000 100.000 150.000 50,000 200.000 6.Raul SL Mw*Kft Rehab.(1) 230.000 230.000 230.000 SLIB.TOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 7,570,000 75,= 30.000 130.000 330,000 300,000 865,000 e,705.000 7.570.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTe 7.620.000 100,000 SS,000 iSS,000 353,000 SIS,000 990,000 6,630,000 7J120,000 ' P"aft bxWed by Dh*M No.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 2 Schedule of Dbtdct Collection System Projeft CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A 8 C D E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST RED EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEAR TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 1998.99 1999.20W 2W"I 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2W7 YEAR TOT COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEM WWNCREASE CAPACITY 1.Reptaee EnidM Relilef Trunk Sewer,P.1 to Edinger(1) e,750,000 - 8,750,0W 8,T50,000 2.Replacement of Newhope Placentia Trunk.2-3R(2) 6,5W,OW 250.0DO 3.OW.OW 3.250.000 3.250,000 8,5W,OW 3.Replacement of Cypress Ave.Subtr nk. 24R(2) 5,750.0W 250,000 2.000.000 3.OW.000 500,000 5,750,000 5,750.000 4.Taft Interceptor Sewer,241.311) 1,8W.000 1.800,000 1,800,000 S.Batavla-Ll cob Trunk Relief(1) 325.000 325.OW 325,000 8.Botse Sewer Re9d(1) 460,OW 460,000 460,OW 7.Soma Ma River Imr(S I1 R.1.)Relief,2 31•(1) 13,414,OW 84,OW 350,000 2,OW,000 S,000,OW B4O00,OW 12,350,OW 1,OW,000 13,350,OW 8.Carbon Canyon Dam Tnmk Sewer 8 P.S.Abandn.(2) 1.775.0m 175.000 1,5W.000 1W.000 1,775,000 1,775,000 SUB TOTAL CAP.IA�RO CAP. 38,774,OW 64,OW 17S,OW 2,iW,OW 4,iW,000 8250,000 8,5W,OW 23,125,OW 13,585,OW 38,710, WW CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIAB 1.Abandonmem of Yorba Linde Pump Station (2) 2W,000 50,OW 50,0W 150.000 2W.OW 2.Santa Ma River Intr Manhole 3 Amu.2-14.5RY(1) 5,052,000 4S2,000 200.000 200.000 2,000,0W 2.000.000 200,000 4.900.000 4,6W.000 3.91 Freeway Widening ftleds,2-7A" 105.000 92,000 13,0W 13,000 13.000 4.1-5 Freeway VMenlnp Prged.2-35 " 109.000 15.000 50,000 44.000 94,OW 94.000 5.1-5 Freeway VNdenkg Pfoled.2-3A " 24,OW 4.0W 20,000 20,0W 20,OW S.Santa Ma River hdr Shut OR Gate Replaoemard 325,000 75.000 250.000 325,0W 325,OW 7.Pump Station Improvemernta,2-37•(10%) 398,700 3,700 60.000 60.000 140,OW 135.000 395,000 395.000 8.MiscellaneousPmleds 600,0Do 1W.000 100,00o iWAW 1WAW 100.000 5W.0W 10D,000 6W,0W SUBTOTAL CAP.tMPROVEMENTSIRELUBILRY 8.813,7W W6.7W 518,WO 654.0W 2,240,0W 2,235,WO 350,OW 5.997,0W 250AW 6,247,OW 1.Euclid Trunk Manhole Rehab.234R 952,0W 122.000 70.000 730.Ot10 3000 830,0W 830,000 2.South Sam&Am River Trunk Easement,2-39 16.000 118,000 SUBTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 968,000 138,0W 70,OW 730,000 30,t1W 830,000 830.OW GRAND.TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 44.555.700 768.700 763,000 3,484,000 6,370.WO 10,485W,O 8,850,000 29,952,000 13,835,DW 43.707.0W • Per0any hrded by Other Districts ••Costs to be reimbursed by Cabana 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION 2.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN 8 CONSTRUCTION r County Sanitation District No. 3 Schedule of Distirld Collection System Pro)eate- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C 0 E F 0 H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 20o2-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE GAPAGRY 1.Artesia Brunch Subbhx*RellM 13) 400.000 50.000 300.000 50.000 400.OW 400.000 2.Westsids Relief Irderoeptor Parallel(3) 5.700,000 5,700.000 5,700,000 3.Wdstskle Relief Tnxhk(3) 700.000 700,000 700.000 4 OraAge-Western Subtnnk Relief Sewer,3-25(2) 1.207.000 57.000 100.000 11,00Q000 50,000 1,150,000 1.150.000 S.Knon INT Relief,Orangethorpe to Artesia(3) 3.300.000 100,000 /.500.000 1.500,000 3,100,000 200,000 3.300.000 6.Hoover-Westem Subtnx*Relief on Trask(3) 1,050.000 50,000 500.000 500.000 1,050,0W 1,050,000 7.Miller-Hokler,Artesia to Hillsborough,3-38-1 121 5,335.000 65.000 150.000 3,000.000 2.000.000 120.000 5,270,0W 5,210.000 S.Miller-Hokler Irnprov., Imperial Hwy.,3-38-3(2) 3.330.000 230.000 2.000,000 1,000,000 100,000 3.100.000 3,100.000 9.Los Alamlos Shbtnxdh Raid(3) 5.000.000 5,000,000 5,000.000 10.Magnolia Relief Swr.Wstmin.-Trask 3-35R-1(1) 2.300,000 300.000 1.800.000 200,000 .2,000,000 2,000,000 11.Slater Ave.Pump Station Roo..11-17-1(1)'112.4%) 1.238.000 1,228.000 10,000 10,000 10.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 29.560.000 1,8 00 80.000 3.960.000 4.200.0 2,400,000 1 3.420.000 2,100.000 16,080,000 11,8W.W0 27,6W .000 CAPITAL IM ROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 1.Te"s Pipe Claim 3-36" 2,112,000 2.012.000 100.000 100,000 100,000 2. 1.5 Freeway WfAenkp.3-37"" 43,000 13.000 20,000 10.000 30,000 30.000 3.Reloc Portion of cos Alamitos Subtnvk,3-0.1 65,000 50.000 15,000 15,000 15.000 4.Pump Station Improvements,2-37-(14%) 558.200 5.200 84.0W 84,000 198.000 189.000 553,000 5S3.000 S.Miscellaneous Prqsds 1.000.000 100.000 I 100,000 1 100.0001 10Q000 I 100.000 500,000 50Q000 1 1,000,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 1 3-7782001 2.080.2001 319.000 1 194.0001 296,0001 289,000 1 100,000 I 1.198,000 I 6W.000 1 1.698,000 REHABILITATION PROJECTS 1.Nidob Street Tnx*Purdt Rehab'(57.8%) (4) 500 000 SMAW 500,000 2.Magnolia Trudy Sewer Rehab,3-35R (2) 3,708.000 900.000 750.000 1,50t1.000 55111.000 2.800,0W 2.11M.000 3.Seal Basch Bled.Rehab..3-1 1R 98.000 38.000 20,000 40.000 60.000 60.000 SUBTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 4.306,000 946.000 770.000 1,540,000 SS0,= 2.080.0001 6W.000 1 3,360,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 37.644.200 4,906.200 5.049.000 1 5,934,000 1 3.246.000 1 3,709.000 2,2W.000 1 20.138.0g0 1 12.6W.000 1 32.738.000 Partially hirded by District No.11 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION -ClamUpperd Pem 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN Partially howled by Other Dls W 3 MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION ""StMed to miowbursement by CALTRANS 4.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN 8 CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 5 Schedule of Dlstrlct Collection System Project_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A 8 C D E F O N 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997.98 IOW99 1999-20M 2000.01 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002.2W7 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPAOVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACITY 1.W.Coasl Hwy Grady Tnmk Rehab5-37-3(20%)•(1) 819.000 699.000 20,000 20.000 20.000 ¢UB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRJCREASE CAP. 619.000 S98.o00 20.000 20,0001 20.0W CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILI 1.Newport Blvd.8 PCH Vddeninp,5-41•(42%) 2W.000 20.000 180,000 20.000 180.000 180.000 2.Rebu0en d Lido Pump Station.5.41-1•" 895.000 25,OW 225.000 575.000 70,000 870,000 070.000 3.Pump Station lmproMnwft.2-31••(28%) 1.116.400 10.41W 18e.ow 168.000 392.000 318.000 1.108.000 1.105.000 4.Mlacelanma P. ed0 350,000 . 125,000 25.0001 25.000 1 25,000 1 25,000 22s.000 1 125.000 1 350.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROIIEMENTSIRE IABIUTY 2.561,400 55,400 678.000 780.0001 487,000 1 403.0001 25.0001 2.381.000 126.000 2,508.0W REHABILITATION PROJEOS 1.Bill Carryon Tnx*Rehabilitation(2) 2.000.OW 50,000 900,000 1.000.000 50.000 2.000.000 2.000.000 2.Beboa Pannkrstla Rehab 500,000 - snow 600.000 SUB-TOTAL REIIABB.ITATM PROJECTS 2.500,OOWO 50.000 900.000 1.Ooo t100 60.000 2.000.0m 6IIO.o00 2.500,O00 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS S,M.400 8"'"I 698.000 &W.000 1.387.000 1.403,000 75,000 1.401.000 e25.o00 5.028,000 •Partially Omded by Olddd No.8 1.MASTER44 ANNW FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION ••Partially Omded by Other Md&ft 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION "•Costs partially d nod with City Of NewpoA 888ch County Sanitation District No. 6 Schedule of District Collection Syebm Projenb CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F 0 H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997.98 199&99 1999.2000 200"1 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2D02-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL WFAMMENTSIINCREASE 1.W.Coaat Hwy Graft Tnmk Rds*.5.27•3(80%) 11) 2.416.000 2.396,000 80,000 80.000 80.0m 2.Fakvlsw RdW. Baker SL Io VAwn SI.,8.12(2) 3.445.000 380,000 1,000,000 1,700,000 385,000 3,085,000 3,085,000 5.LSstrkl 8 Tnsir Per"M 1,325,000 25.000 500,000 1.000,000 1.325,000 1,525.000 4.Dover Dd"Tn"Per"(5) 1.5m.000 100.0m 1.000.000 400,0m 1.500.000 1.500.000 5.Colepe Ave.P.S.PmOd F.M.(5%)—12) 74.000 1,500 7.5W 85,000 72.5W 715W SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 8.820,000 2,777.5001 87,500 1 1.085.000 1 1.825,000 1 1.005.000 1.400.000 8,042,50D 8,042.&M CAPITAL WROVEMOMMIABIL 1.Newport Blvd.8 PCH Wlderdnp.5-41(58%) 277.00D 28,000 221,0W 28.00D 249,000 249,000 2.Watson Ave/CeUomis Street Sewer.8-13(2) 1.080,000 35.000 110,000 915.000 1.025.000 1.025.000 a.►mow or MW Itwu C0111e Mess 100.000 100.000 100,000 4.M19eellaneous Projsds 250,0W 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25,000 125.000 125.000 250.000 s.Pump Stsdon MWmements,2-37•••(8%) 229.200 2.200 38,0001 38.WD 1 84,000 I 81,000 I 297,0W 257.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSFREUABILITY 1,928,2W 65.200 392.0001 1,OXWO 1 109,0001 108.000 2s,000 Twe.000 225.000 1.881,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 10,748,200 2.8/2.700 479.500 2.089.000 1,934,000 1.771,000 1,125,000 7,878,500 225.000 7,903.500 1 J. • Partially tended by D1*Id No.5 ••Partially Wed by District No.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION «. Partially tlmded by Other Dletrlds 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 3.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 7 Schedule of DISdkt Collection System PToj"-_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A. B C D E F O H i J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES /997.98 1998-99 1OW2000 2000-01 2001.02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPRMMMENTSIINCREASE CAPACITY 1.Orarge Park Acres Tnnk Replaannrd 7.17(2) 821,000 37.000 50,000 604000 134.000 781.000 784,000 21ustin Air Base Facilities (3) 5.750.000 150,000 2.000.000 3,000.000 500.000 100,000 • 5.750.000 5.750,000 3.North Tmr*ReptaarnmM(3) 2.650.000 50.000 1.400.000 1.000,000 2.450.000 200.000 2.650.000 4. Gisler-Red Hit Interceptor(3) 5.300,000 300.000 300.000 5.000.000 5.300.000 5.Red Hit interceptor Parallel(3) 1.400.000 1.400.000 1,400,000 8.Lemon HaWs Sewer Replace , L 7-22.112(3) 5.414.000 1.064.000 550,000 2.0WAW 2.550,000 1.000.000 3.550.000 7.Brom-Ang Tm*ReptaomeM(3) 850.000 850.000 e50.000 8.Co0epe Ave PS Parallel Fame Mdn.7-23.1(95%)-(2) 1.405.000 27.000 143.000 1,235.000 1.378,000 1.378.000 9.Improvemerds to Main St.P.S.,7-7.1(26%)'(2) 967,000 217.000 650,000 100,000 750.000 750.000 10.Main St.Pump Station Exparrdon.7-7-2(28%)•(3) 775.000 T75.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENfSi1NCREASE CAP 25.332.000 2.145.OW 993.0001 3.935.000 1 3,484.0001 2.450.000 3.100,000 13.982.000 S.IS0.000 22 412.000 775.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 1.Pump Sbdm hnprovemenls.2.37 (33%)-(3) 1.315.200 12,200 109.000 198,000 462.000 445,000 1.303AM 1.303.000 2.Pump Slatlon Abandonment,7-14-3 (3) 425.000 75.000 200.000 150,000 425.000 425,000 3.Miscellaneous Pro)eds 500.000 60.000 50,000 50.000 60.000 SO,o00 250.000 2501000 500.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPRONEMENTSIREUABIUTY 2.240,200 12.200 248.000 323,000 712.000 645,000 50.000 109,000 250,000 2.228.000 ON PROJECTS 1.Surdlower Manhole Rehab.7.21 (M%)"(>) 300.000 1.000 70.000 185.000 50,000 305,000 305.000 2.Mlscetenamm Repair of Lail Sewers (4) 5.800.000 1110.000 1,200.000 1.200,000 1.200,000 1.200.000 4.900,000 700.000 5.800.000 SUB-TOTAL REHIABILITATION PROJECTS 5,906.000 1.000 100,000 1,270,000 1.385,OOD 1.250.000 1,200.000 1 5.205,000 700.000 5.905.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 33.478.200 2.158 00,200 1.341.0 5.52e,000 I 5.5800 1.0 4.345,000 4.350.0011 21.145.000 9.400.000 1 30.545.000 775,000 • Partially tlmded by DbYW No.14 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION Partially funded by District ft.i 2.MASTER-PUNNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN PaNaty baled by District No.6 3.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION «..pity tmded by DOW Mbkb 4.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN&CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 11 Schedule of District Collection System Prof"_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-08 1898-89 ISM2000 2000-01 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACITY 1.Slater Ava.Pump Station Repl..11-17-1(1)•(87.6%) 6.520.000 0.450.000 70.000 70.000 70.000 2.GoldenweM SL Sewer Repla arnent.11-17-2 (1) 2.7W.000 4d.0W 135.000 500.000 2,000.000 50.000 2.685.000 X655.000 3.Slater Ave.Refef(2) 1.700.000 1.TW.0W 1.700.000 4.Hem Intercept"M 3,150.000 150.000 3.000.000 3,150.000 3.150.000 5.Slater/Sprtrrpddle Replacement(2) 800.000 OW.000 OW.000 6.Werner Ave Sewer Roger(2) 1.5W.000 1.500.000 1 1.500.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 16.41W.000 6,495.000 205.0001 5W.000 I 2.000.WD 1 200.000 5.0W.000 5.905.0001 4,OW.000 1 9,905.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSA3ELIA8111� 1.Huntlnpton Beach Purchase Aband.11-18(2) 325,000 75.000 250.000 325.000 325.000 2.Pump StaSan brrpm-nwrb.2-W(9%)"m 358.300 3,300 54.000 $4.000 126.060 121.OW ass dc0 355.OW 3.Mlsceeanean PA" 600.000 150.000 50.0w 50.000 50.000 50.000 350.000 250.000 e60.0m SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIAeIUTY 1.283.300 3,300 279.000 354,000 170.0001 171.000 50.000 1.O30.01111 250.000 1.289.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 17.663.300 8.498.3W 484.000 854.000 2.170.000 371,OW 3.050.000 6.935,OW 4,250.OW 11.185.000 • PaNaAy horded by ObWd No.3 ' ••Parllaiyr horded by Other DlsMs /.MASTER-PLAMEO FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 14 Schedule of District Colleetlon System Pmjeid.� CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C 0 E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997.98 1998.99 IM2000 2000-01 2001412 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMEWSANCREASEOAPACITY 1.Mpmvemwft to Main St.P.S.,7-7-1(72%)'(1) 2,120.000 195.000 1.675.000 250.000 1,025.000 1.025.000 2.Mein Street Pump Statbn Eipanslan,7-7-2(72%)"(2) 2,000.000 2.OW.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMEWSANCREASE CAP. 1,120,000 1 195.0001 1.675,0001 2S0.000 1,025,000 I 1.026.000 2.000.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABII.ITY 1.Mlseftnsous Projects MOW 25A00 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 125.000 125,000 250,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.1IMPROVEMENTSIR9JA8BJTY 250.000 25.000 25.000 25,000 25.000 25.000 125A00 125.000 250,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1,370,000 195,000 1,700,000 275,OD0 25.000 25,000 25.000 2.050.000 /25,000 X176,000 2,00 ow • Partially KaMed by IX Md No.? Future construco n near 2020.pwIlay Knitted by 0.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION 4, ` RESOLUTION NO. 97-33-6 INITIATING PROPOSAL TO CONSOLIDATE DISTRICTS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 APPLYING TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 56000, ET Ste• WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts were originally formed and organized in 1947-48 as separate districts providing sewer services, generally following the drainage patterns of Orange County; and, WHEREAS, Orange County's sewer system is now well-established, and the current main focus of the nine districts is on joint projects and the attendant regulatory issues; and, WHEREAS, over the years, the continuation of the nine districts as separate entities has contributed to certain administrative and financial burdens; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Part 3 of Division 3 of Title 5 of the Government Code, known as the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 ("the Act"), certain local agencies may make request to the Local Agency Formation Commission for a change of organization or a reorganization; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 6 is a local agency authorized to make such a proposal; and, WHEREAS, "consolidation" is one type of change of organization or reorganization permitted by the Act, defined as the uniting or joining of two or more districts, formed pursuant to the same principal act, into a single new successor'district; and, WHEREAS, notice of intent to adopt this resolution of application has not been given to each interested and each subject agency as is permitted, but not required by Government Code Section 56800(b); and, WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be consolidated is inhabited; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of streamlining administration and Board procedures, maintaining financial and other records, and reducing costs, it has been determined by the District that the proposed consolidation will effect substantial administrative benefits and financial savings, both individually and collectively. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: This proposal for a change of organization is made pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 2: The change of organization proposed herein is the consolidation of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 into a single County Sanitation District, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. I f ` Section 3: The boundaries of the affected nine districts are as depicted in Exhibit "A", attached. The boundaries of the proposed consolidated district are as depicted in Exhibit "B", attached. Section 4: Terms and conditions of the proposed consolidation regarding consolidation of assets and financial obligations are set forth on Exhibit "C", attached. Section 5: The number and method of selection of members of the governing Board shall be as provided in California Government Code Section 4730.65. Section 6: The following person is to be furnished with copies of the report by the Executive Officer and to be given mailed notice of the hearing on the proposal: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Section 7: This proposal is to be considered a formal request that proceedings for consolidation be taken pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 8: A plan for providing services within the affected territory is attached as Exhibit "D". Section 9: The effective date of the consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 24, 1997. H:\wp.dta\admin\BS\R ES\R ES97\97-33-6.doc r. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, PENNY KYLE, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97-33-6 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board on the 24th day of September, 1997, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: James M. Ferryman, Chair; Jan Debay NOES: William G. Steiner ABSENT: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, this 24th day of September, 1997. Penny Kyl a etary Board of Direct rs of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange,County, California( H:lwp.dta\admin\BS\FORMS07TI3.033.6.doc ,` EXHIBIT A— Map of Current Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S wNlrneR ewD O,9 q��� LA HABRA qti 9 n tAhdeERr RD IMPERIAL HWV , c B EA SASTANCNURV RD Y L FT0N VORSA UNDA Uvo . rAA�veRN YORBA E LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� OJT I ORANOET O AVE I 2 �O C LA UENA I o PALM UNmWAFlK > 5 vF�J ANAHEIM VILLA O 150 SALLRO CYPRE S I W TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON ; LAMITOS O I A RAN E W � a 3 > � a CMA►�4AN AVB = a GARDEN GRO S STMIISTE WESTIIINSTBR IANE tTTN ST B � O W TUS , MC f DDEN sr ql SANT W . ANA WARNER AVE 8 FQUNTA r ElUS AV VALLEY P ,a I HUN INCN ADAMS AVE b O PACIFIC COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE r�' W P O5 ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS "a.0 a rA� OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 EXHIBIT B—Map of Proposed Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY Lr wwlrneR BLVD �~ LA HABRA d Oq�� QFq LAMBERT RO C�C�9qO IMPERIAL HWY B EA oL�� BASTA wURV AD VORBA UNOA BLVD MALVERN L ON YORBA `NA""NAYe LACENTIA LINDA 93, OJt]� i ORAI ETNO AY8 I ,�C �5 1 UE A I o UNOOLLNAAV K y >° g I ANAHEIM W VILLA rC BALLROI CYPRESS I TA AYe PARK LOS W STANTON 3 LAMITOS I a RANGE 4 I u'I ONA►WIN AVB 2 � GARDEN 11�� GRO STMINS i S WESTWNSTER�Ve 177N sT � B s rt TUS ;# Me F EN sr g SANT W1;91, o ANA WARNER AVE I J 8 FOUNTA EiLISAVEI LLEY I ,� HUN IN N ADAMS A GJ Gq PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE P Ptr' �e NEWPORT BEACH N N • I I arA or ru• SRVM-CLR.CDR CS00C 1/95 Exhibit C LAFCO Application Terms & Conditions Consolidation of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1. The nine separate districts known jointly as the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ("CSDOC") shall be consolidated into one single county sanitation district pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code Sections 4730 et seq.) and shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County ("District"). [G.C. §56844(v)] (As used herein, "CSDOC" refers to the nine Districts, both jointly, singly and in any combination.) 2. As a result of consolidating, the nine existing districts shall be dissolved and be reorganized as one consolidated District with one consolidated Board of Directors under California Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. At the time of consolidation, the Board of Directors would include representatives from the following jurisdictions: [G.C. §56844(n)] • County (1) - County of Orange Unincorporated Area • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Santa Ana Buena Park La Habra Seal Beach Cypress La Palma Stanton Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Tustin Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District 3. Directors of District shall be compensated in accordance with applicable state law. Pagel 4. All system facilities shall be transferred from existing CSDOC to District as of the effective date of consolidation in an "as-is" condition, without any payment or repair obligation from CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(k)(v)] 5. All lands, buildings, real and personal property, assets and appurtenances held by CSDOC, as of the effective date of the consolidation, shall be transferred to District. Such assets are enumerated in the CSDOC Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ending June 30, 1997. [G.C. §56844(b)] 6. District shall be designated as the successor to CSDOC and retain all of the rights, duties and obligations of the former CSDOC with respect to enforcement, performance or payment of any outstanding bonds, contracts or obligations of the former CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(m)] 7. All previously authorized charges, fees assessments and/or taxes currently in effect by CSDOC shall be continued by District. [G.C. §56844(t)] 8. The establishment of Special Zones within District, pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 4850 et seq., shall be effected on July 1, 1998 and shall collectively include any or all portions of the entire CSDOC service area and individually include the specified areas as shown on the nine attached maps. The existing rate schedules within each of the Special Zones shall continue as presently in effect by each District within CSDOC until such time as amended by the District's Board of Directors. The annual sewer service charge can only be amended by a vote of two-thirds of all members of the governing body. [G.C. §56844(e)] 9. All agreements by and between any two or more existing CSDOC's, including but not limited to: joint sewer ownership or use, construction or maintenance of facilities, shall be terminated upon the effective date of the consolidation. The termination of the agreements is appropriate in recognition of the new District assuming full and exclusive ownership and authority over all rights, duties and obligations of all existing CSDOC's. 10. To the extent not inconsistent with the terms of the consolidation, and as necessary to cant' out the original intent, all contracts between the Irvine Ranch Water District and one or more existing CSDOC's, including those relating to ownership of capacity rights in treatment, disposal and sewer facilities, shall be assigned to District and remain in full force and effect. All contracts between County Sanitation District No. 14 and one or more Page 2 CSDOC's shall also be assigned to the new District and remain in full force and effect. 11. CSDOC shall transfer any and all indebtedness and the obligation to levy taxes, charges, assessments, or fees in order to make payment of said indebtedness to District. [G.C. §56844(c)] 12. CSDOC shall file a statement with LAFCO that the reorganization shall not adversely affect or impair the status of any employee of CSDOC or District. As of the effective date of this reorganization, all employees of CSDOC shall become employees of District. Rates of pay, accrued vacation and sick leave, vacation and sick leave accrual rates, employee rights, insurance, retirement benefits, and all other benefits and programs shall be transferred over to District at then-current levels. Memoranda of Understanding in place under CSDOC shall be transferred to the new District. [G.C. §56844(l)] 13. Permits issued to CSDOC by any federal, state or local regulatory authority, shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties as contained within the permits and to continue operations without interruption. Such permits shall include but not be limited to: CSDOC's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit, including a waiver for full secondary treatment pursuant to Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act, and all other air and land permits. [G.C. §56844(v)] 14. Permits issued by CSDOC shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties contained in said permits and in the laws authorizing the issuance of said permits. Such permits shall include but not be limited to Sewer Connection Permits and Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permits. [G.C. §56844(c)] 15. District shall assume all existing contracts and obligations presently in full force and effect with CSDOC and which have not otherwise been specifically referenced herein. [G.C. §56844(m)] 16. The effective date of this consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. [G.C. §56844(p)] Page 3 Map of Special Zone 1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, wMITneR BLVD LA HABRA d LAMBERT RO 4 q�-rv`Cq-r9gO' IMPERIAL MWV BASTA MURY L ON YORSA LINOA BIVD MALVERN YORBA 13 CMAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA GOJ�1 OM ETMO4qg AVE 1 2 A LA PALM UN PA K g ANAHEIM a VILLA O �o BALL RD CY RESS I PARK TA AVE LOS STANTON g LAMITOS w RAN E P @ a W O ¢ j S Y m CMAPMAN AVE Z m o ��+ GARD N a GRO STMI S SE VVESTMINSTER VE :i:.S7T►FiST<�%.`:Y!i 9 s W 7 TUS Mc s s sr q, J , 8 F UNTA o� E S AVE ALLEY MF. C HUN,TINGT Nye Pgr�9O ° ADAMSAVI O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA '° IRVINE O5 ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS : OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, WNITTIER 6LVD LA HABRA d �ti� l9ggn LAMBERT RD •'O/AA-- IMPERIAL NWVX. B Ea ti RAS �- L ON 4oReA LBVDA aLvc 13 MALVERN ... YORBA CNAFMAN AVE ,LACENTJA LINDA 9/L�9 OM ETNO AVEI J LA UE A I o° PA K :.... �C? PALM UN WAVE 5 ANAHEIM YILf_4 �. BALL RD CY RE S I - ..a .Tn ve _ PARK.. LOS W STANTON LAMITOS :RAN. E ` ;; .. STMI S SE wESTImNSTER vE 17TN ST cc B � 1 7 O TUS S MD F DEN Si 9J�ry g SANT W m ANA WARNER AVE i 8 F 3 U NTNANNo 1 E US AVE ALLEY FC fi' HUN N N s c ADAMS A G yr O PACIFIC MILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE O5 ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 3 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, w«IrnsR Bivo<:: O9.9ti F 6 .LA uwSS;Fr F 'IuPERtAL NWY B EA BASTAN NURY r YORBA LINDA BlVO O �uLVERN L ON YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA OM FTs(O AVE 2 OJ G UE A c0 �, LA 0� A PALM u K ANAHE[M' W VILLA O aiiit.Ru.:CY. RE, PARK 43 LAMITO 3 RAN E m o m m m J �y s S X CNAPWi1tAV6... �' z m *�` GARDEN o ,. . .. GRO STMI SE WESLMiKEfER vs: ,TTN sr B s`t '' 7 s u 1 O TUS MC F DDEN ST 11 O ANA WARNER AVE W J T� g AVE kLLEY HUN Jy� sqa� a !ADAMS�i�Vi iiiiii' 4 g! O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA �a° IRVINE NEW PORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS " ' ' ," OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 5 LOS ANGELES COUNTY WMITTIER BLVD LA HABRA 09gtice�9w n LAMBERT RD F .r99 IMPERIAL MWY COG O,�OQ B EA BASTAN MURY ''ORBA LINDA BLVD L ON MALVERN YORBA 13 C MAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� ORA ETMO AVE I r�iO C �O UE A O LA PA K PALMA u °> 5 ANAHEIM a VILLA 4D �O BALL RD CY RE S I TA vE PARK LOS STANTON ; N LAMITOS w O s RANG E o O F W `Q` m J 3 > Y e CHAPMAN AVEI Z m S A GARD N GRO STMI S SE wESTMINSTER ILVE MST a 9 > � m O TUS Me s N sT '9i 11 3 g SANT W m ANA wARNER AVE J 8 F UNTA o 1 E US AVE ALLEY �� c�HrF�o ' 4e�e HUN INGfT N ADAMSAVE9 g O PACIFIC COST OCEAN MESA ��° « IRVINE eP 5 >: NEWPORT:' N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 _ SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 6 LOS ANGELES COUNTY WNIrnER BLVD 0t1�q",re� LA HABRA LIP7�Y 1 �•y n LAMBERT RD � �•7 IMPERIAL HWV CO(�ti O/HOC B EA BASTANC//NURY RD YORBA LINDA BLVD L ON MALVERN YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LIN DA 9'L� LACE IA �y 9s ORA ETNO W&AVE / GOJ 2 O�O C LATUN A PALM K 5 ANAHEIM Ig VILLA O �O ML RD CYPRESS I TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON 8 LAMITOS z O o RANGE a o g W 3 > Y m CHAPMAN AV a GARD N GRO STMI S S WEBTMNSTER kV6 I7T11 ST B 7 u O TUS MC F DDEN ST 11 g SANT W m ANA WARNER AVE J 8 F UNT r 1 E 11SAVE ALLEY HUN IN N ADAMS A cc O gT V PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST. OCEAN IRVINE MES! ...... ve �r 5 J rP NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS iYA 01 YtA� OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 7 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 3, WHITTIER BLVD LA HABRA LAMBERT RD 4 CFc'Y,9nO IMPERIAL HWV B EA BASTA HURY L ON `'ORBA uNDA eLVD MALVERN YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA OJ� ORA ETNO AVE 2 C �G UE A �., LA PLM uN PA K £A 5 ANAHEIM a VILLA O BALL RD CY RESS i TA VE PARK LOS STANTON ; LAMITOS O S RAN E 5 > Y u CNAPMAN AVE' 2 m o � GARDEN o GRO STMI S SE WESTWNSTER VE 17TN ST 9cc � m MCP OEN ST /'9j, J G g 11 g SANT O W . ANA WARNER AVE FOUNTA IF AYE A LLEY N r F HUN IN T4N F9 ° ADAMS AVq4J �H gr Olo PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE O5 ,eeti NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS y ' r�we or r� OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 11 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, WNITTIER BLVD LA HABRA 9YV 9'Iq LAMBERT AD c� 9 IMPERIAL HWV B EA BASTAN NURY VORSA LINOA BLVO O MALVERN L ON YORBA 13 CNAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA J�1 OM ETNO AVE O 5 UE A C� PA K PALMA uN Og ANAHEIM W VILLA O BALL AD CY RE S I W TA vE PARK LOS STANTON > RANGE LAMITOS O Q O 3 > Y m CHAPMAN AV S b c �+ GARD N a GRO STMISIS S WESTMINSTER VE 177N 8T C B Y W 3 ::::::::::»:>< mus MC F DDEN ST SANT ANA WARNER AVE 1 :E 8 AVE ALLEY tEI1N N,. . N o AOAMS AVE O gT O PACIFIC "w °""v COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE Og J NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 13 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ER BIVD WNITTI 0 q-re LA HABRA 9'q�L^n;9 n LAMBERT RD - v` ��•'/ IMPERIAL NWr B EA BASTAN NURY rORBA LINDA BLVD L ON 13 MALVERN YORBA ,p CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA OMI O O AVE.2. NOETN J 2 G I O 5 UE A LA �Co PALM u LN AV PA K Og ANAHEIM o VILLA IO BALL RD CY RE S i TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON ; 01 m LAMITOS O a RAN E O a m m j W O* < W 3 > x m CNAPMAN AVB 2 m c A� GARDEN GRO STMI S SE �7wr- INSTER MVE 1Ti1/ST 7 B W 3 O TUS _ MC F DEN Sr 11 SANT g W m ANA WARNER AVE 8 F UNTA E usAVE ALLEY ° OJy�PP �909 4'�r HUN IN N ADAMS A g O PACIFIC AIAILTONAVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE r O5 , NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ° OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S WNITTIER BLVD LA HABRA LAMBERT RD CFC q'90 IMPERIAL HWV B EA BASTA NURY VORSA LINDA BLVD L ON MALVERN YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA GOJ�� ORANOETNo SAVE j A L. ��. LA PALMA LI PA K > Og I ANAHEIM a VILLA O -ALL RD CYPRESS I TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON S LAMITOS o O RANGE W I- R > Y 0 C14APMAN AVE m v G ARD N � GRO STMI S S VMS 1ANSTE E 17TNST e W 7 U 1 < H T a m O US MC R DDEN 5T 11 o SANT O P U. m ANA W WARNER AVE J i r S FU NTA 1 a ALL EY II :�;.�;:2kiiii <2'i5 `i`�<<�it` 2i ?t E1L14 AVE N :::::.:.: .::::::::. HUN IN N ......:..,� AQAMB AVI 0 6 PACIFIC AMI LTON AVE OCEAN COST 0 R..:...:. .:. MESA e a J P � P P 1 ?J ti Oe NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ° cwA a rw OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Exhibit D Plan of Services for the Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County L INTRODUCTION This Plan of Services has been prepared pursuant to Government Code Section 56653, which requires that a plan for providing services within the affected territory be provided whenever an application for a change of organization is submitted to LAFCO. This document will facilitate the consolidation of the nine (9)existing County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) into one single County Sanitation District pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq. The resulting consolidated agency shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County (District). This consolidation proposes a transfer of all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of CSDOC to the District. The Plan of Services provides a description of CSDOC and its operations and how they will be consolidated as the District. jl DESCRIPTION OF CSDOC A. General Information The CSDOC is made up of nine independent special districts. Each district is a political subdivision of the State of California and is governed by a representative of each city and sanitary district within the district and, if the District includes unincorporated territory, a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Each district has its own budget. All districts except District Nos. 13 and 14 have their own tax rate and trunk sewer systems. District No. 13 buys capacity in the other districts' transmission facilities. A Joint Administrative Organization was formed in 1948 to administer the business of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities and the activities common to all districts. This is provided for in a Joint Ownership Operation and Construction Agreement. The day-to-day operation of the organization is under the direction of a General Manager, one assistant general manager, eight department heads, for an authorized staff of 560 full time equivalents for the Fiscal Year 1997-98. B. Types of Services, Level, and Range of Service Currently Provided The CSDOC is a single-purpose public entity formed solely for the collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater and its residuals and serves the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal needs of approximately 2.2 million people. During 1996-1997, an average daily sewage influent flow of 244 million gallons per day (MGD) was treated and 510 wet tons per day of residual solids (biosolids) was produced. CSDOC encompasses a 470 square-mile area of Orange County that includes 23 of the County's 31 cities. CSDOC operates the third largest wastewater management agency of its kind west of the Mississippi,with assets valued at more than$1 billion dollars. The nine individual districts own about 650 miles of major trunk sewers, 22 pumping stations and two major treatment plants with disposal facilities to safely discharge the treated effluent through an ocean outfall into deep ocean waters. The treatment plants process an average of 244 million gallons of wastewater per day. Page 1 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley. It has a current operational primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 108 MGD and a secondary treatment capacity of 66 MGD currently being expanded to 80 MGD. Treatment Plant No. 2 is in Huntington Beach. It has a primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 186 MGD. Plant No. 2 provides advanced primary treatment to all of the wastewater that enters the plant and secondary treatment to up to 90 MGD of the total flow. Table 1 highlights the service area characteristics and system features. Table 1 Service Area Joint Works Facilities -As of June 30, 1997 Total Population Served (estimated) 2,275,000 Service Area (estimated) 470 square miles Total Number of Cities Served 23 Total Miles of Trunk Sewers 650 Number of Pumping Stations 22 Number of Treatment Plants 2 Primary Treatment Capacity (includes standby) Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 Total Primary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 MGD Secondary Treatment Capacity Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 Total Secondary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . 156 MGD Total Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450 MGD Reported Average Daily Flow Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 MGD Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 MGD Total Average Daily Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 MGD Page 2 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service C. Description of Sanitary Sewer System CSDOC processes wastewater from the collection systems of the various cities, water districts and local sewer agencies. They do not deal directly with individual customers except for portions of District No. 7, which is located primarily in unincorporated territory of the County near Tustin. CSDOC's assets consist of individual district assets and each district's respective share of jointly owned assets. Table 2 summarizes the respective District ownership in jointly owned and separately owned property, plant, equipment and construction in progress, at cost, as of June 30, 1997: Table 2 District Ownership Jointly Owned Separately Owned Total Total property, plant and equipment $804,200,000 $321,300,000 $1,135,500,000 Less accumulated $310,200,000 depreciation Net property, plant and equipment $825,300,000 D. Additional Assets In addition to its real property and facilities, CSDOC owns service vehicles, equipment, tools, repair parts inventory, and communications and office equipment. CSDOC maintains cash, liquid securities to meet its cash flow requirements, and other reserves. The following table summarizes the districts' reserves budgeted for the end of Fiscal Year 1996-97. Table 3 Reserves Analysis "Dry Period" Operating Cash Flow $28,021,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,221,000 Debt Service Reserves Fund Balance 59,724,000 Capital Reserves 49,233,000 Environmental Requirements Reserves 4,484,000 Flood/Earthquake Insurance Reserves 81,450,000 Rate Stabilization Funds 141,200,000 Total $375,333,000 Page 3 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service E. Liabilities As of June 30, 1997, CSDOC liabilities included debt in the amount of approximately $397,575,000. These issues include $397,45,000 of Certificates of Participation (COP) and $30,000 of general obligation (G.O.) bonds. The Districts have maintained their AA- rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and Aa rating from Moody's Investor Services, although all COP issues are backed by issuance of letters of credit and are rated AAA. The Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget provides for$32,620,000 to service the debt on the various COPS issued. In addition, there is a $15,000 annual payment to maturity in January 1999 for the G.O. bonds in District No. 1 1. Consolidation of the districts will have no impact on the liabilities of CSDOC. Under consolidation into a single County Sanitation District, the new County Sanitation District assessments all predecessor district obligations. Further, the districts are presently joined by agreement to manage and fund liabilities. The new consolidated District will establish special zones upon consolidation to continue differential user fees and to ensure that predecessor districts' outstanding debt is serviced by only those residents who originally assumed that debt. The boundaries of each zone will be the same as those of each predecessor district. The new consolidated District will establish nine (9) zones to differentiate and account for costs, revenues and liabilities of the existing districts. In addition, an Improvement District (ID) could be formed coincident with each predecessor district's service area to enable proper segregated accounting for the retirement of the existing Certificates of Participation (COPs) debt. As new future borrowing may occur, new ID's would be formed to include the service area benefiting from the projects. Such new ID's would not necessarily have boundaries congruent with the zones. For projects at the treatment plants, however, an ID to include all of the new District's service area could be formed to properly allocate the cost of such improvements that would benefit all the zones. It is also expected that the consolidated District would continue the practice of dedicating Ad Valorem Taxes where it would be collectable within a zone to the retirement of long-term debt of an appropriate ID. F. Management and Employees CSDOC presently operates in a consolidated fashion pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code Section 4840 et seq. CSDOC currently employs approximately 560 full-time employees. Legal Services are provided by the law firm of Woodruff, Spradlin and Smart auditing services are also provided by contract. In addition, various other services are contracted-out. These include such varied services as groundskeeping, environmental review, ocean research and reporting, etc. CSDOC's organization chart is included in CSDOC's Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget which is submitted along with this application. The existing net joint operation budget for Fiscal Year 1997-98 is $46,922,650. Consolidation of the districts into a single District would result in the continuation of management and operational structures and functional expenditures similar to those described above. Operations of the new District would remain the same as the current operations of CSDOC. Consequently, there would be no change in employee compensation and employee benefits as adjustments would not be required. The transition from the existing joint operation to a single District operation would have no impact on employees, their occupational status, or their benefits. Page 4 ` CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service G. Rates and Charges Each district, except District No. 14, has an adopted Sanitary Sewer Service Fee to provide funding for operating the sewer systems in accordance with the Clean Water Act and CSDOC's Revenue Program. District No. 14 is funded through the payment of an annual charge by the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) directly to CSDOC. IRWD levies and collects individual user charges from each parcel receiving service. Sanitary Sewer Service Fees are set annually by each district after a review of projected needs. In May, 1997, The Board of Directors adopted a user rate increase fee schedule that provides for gradual rate increase over the next five years for six of the nine districts. This represents that first user rate increase in seven years. The Districts have been able to avoid user fee increases by reducing operational costs through reorganizing and streamlining Districts operations, holding vacant positions open, and deferring new facilities. However, because the Districts'capital improvement program's debt service obligations continued to increase beyond the level of its primary funding source, i.e. property tax revenues, and because of the additional capital improvement requirements, increase in user fees became inevitable. The following is the adopted Annual Sewer Service Fee Rate Schedule District 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 1 $91.36 $100.27 $110.04 $120.77 $132.55 2 $73.00 $75.00 $77.00 $80.00 $82.00 3 $75.00 $76.00 $77.00 $78.00 $80.00 5 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 6 $78.00 $80.00 $82.00 $84.00 $86.00 7 $55.00 $60.00 $66.00 $73.00 $80.00 11 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 $101.25 $113.91 13 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 As was indicated previously, establishment of special zones upon consolidation would continue the existing schedules of differential Sanitary Sewer Service Fees until such time as amended by action of the governing body. Said fees shall not be amended without a two- thirds vote of all members of the governing body. Consolidation is expected to facilitate reorganizing and streamlining the new District's operations. H. Summary of Revenues and Expenses The CSDOC Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget, which is included in this application package, contains detailed information regarding revenues and expenses. Attention is called to Section 3, pages 1-13, of the Budget document for summary information. III DESCRIPTION OF THE CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT A. General Page 5 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service The nine independent County Sanitation Districts currently collectively known as CSDOC, and which utilize joint operating, working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, will be consolidated into a single County Sanitation District pursuant to the California County Sanitation District Act(Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq.). The boundaries of the consolidated District will be the same as the outer boundaries of those nine predecessor districts. B. Types of Services, Level and Range of Services The new District will assume all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of the former CSDOC. The District will own and operate the wastewater treatment system which provides sewage collection, treatment and disposal services currently owned and operated by the nine (9) Sanitation Districts known jointly as CSDOC. C. District Structure The District' s organization will be the same as that structure which presently exists under the CSDOC joint operating agreement for the operation and administration of the joint facilities. D. Governing Board Composition The new District will be formed under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65. Under Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65, the governing body of the consolidated District would be made up of a 25-member board representing local cities, sanitary districts and the County of Orange unincorporated area. Board membership would decrease from 29 to 25 with the loss of double representation for the Cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Yorba Linda and the County of Orange. The proposed governing Board formed under Section 4730.65 would include the following agencies: • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Tustin Buena Park La Habra Santa Ana Cypress La Palma Seal Beach Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Stanton Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda. • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District I • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District • County (1) - County of Orange (to represent the Unincorporated Areas) Page 6 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service E. Three Year Budget of the Consolidated District It is anticipated that revenues and expenditures which would have been budgeted by CSDOC for the operation and administration of joint facilities and the construction of capital improvements will be the basis for the new District's financial plan. Attachment A is a 3-year projection of the District's budget under consolidation. The projection covers Fiscal Years 1998-99, 1999-2000 and 2000-2001. Attachment B is a summary of anticipated capital improvements for the new District. This summary of capital needs was derived from CSDOC's Joint Works Capital Improvements Budget. IV IMPACTS ON CUSTOMERS There will be no negative financial impact on customers. No rate changes are anticipated as a result of the consolidation. Please refer to previous discussion regarding the formation of special zones. V. IMPACTS ON OTHER JURISDICTIONS There will be no service level impacts on any of the cities, sanitary districts, and other agencies presently relying on services provided by CSDOC as the services responsibilities, without modification, will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Effective date is proposed as July 1, 1998. Vi.. IMPACTS ON REGIONAL PARTICIPATION All CSDOC's contractual obligations will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Accordingly, there are no anticipated impacts. Page 7 9i5/97 Consolidated Sanitation Distrct of Orange County Projected Budgets Fiscal Years 199849 Thru 2000-01 9>9 8-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 Revenues Industrial/Commercial Use Fees $ 9,317,000 $ 10,714,000 $ 12,322,000 Sewer Service Fees 65,938,000 68,907,000 72,435,000 Fees From Other Agencies 6,150,000 4,700,000 5,250,000 Connection Fees 6,784,000 8,065,000 9,727,000 Interest 22,443,000 22,420,000 21,749,000 Miscellaneous &Other 2,640,500 4,141,500 4,141,500 Property Taxes 30,572,000 30,565,000 30,552,000 New COP Issues 53,200,000 57,000,000 62,400,000 Total Revenues $ 197,044,500 $ 206,512,500 $ 218,587,500 Requirements Collection System 08M Expenses $ 9,553,000 $ 10,804,000 $ 10,527,000 Treatment System O&M Expenses 47,861,000 48,818,000 49,794,000 Collection System Improvements 20,997,000 24,902,000 26,497,000 Treatment System Improvements 70,086,000 78,429,500 96,380,500 GO Bond Principal&Interest 16,000 16,000 - Costs of New COP Issuance 2,660,000 2,850,000 3,120,000 COP Service&Retirement 37,772,000 42,590,000 47,834,000 Total Expenses $ 188,945,000 $ 208,409,500 $ 234,152.500 Revenue Exceeding Expenses $ 8,099,500 $ (1,897,000) $ (15,565,000) Beginning Cash Balances 385,031,450 393,130,950 391,233.950 Ending Cash Balances $ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,668,950 Appropriations. Dedications & Reserves "Dry Period"Operating Cash Flow $ 28,800,000 $ 30,121,000 $ 30,737.000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,483,000 11,925,000 12,064,000 Capital Projects Completion 49,995,000 49,946,200 49,540,100 Environmental Requirements Reserve 4,634,000 4,484,000 4,484,000 Required Debt&COP Service Reserves 38,359,000 41,133,000 44,230,000 "Dry Period"COP Service Cash Flow 27,705,350 31,244,600 35,=350 Property &Liability Catastrophe Reserve 89,752,850 90,971,850 91,208,250 Rate Stabilization Funds 142,401,750 131,408,300 108,383,250 •$ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,668,950 Unappropriated Cash & Investment Balances $ $ $ County Sanitation District No. 1 adwdlee of Obtrkt Coftedoe System P1o1qcft CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST RED FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT 702020 PURCHASES 1097-55 1YNB-1111 IM2000 200"1 2MI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002.2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABII.ITY 1.mWellan"M Pro" 250.000 25.000 23.000 25,000 25.000 25.000 125.000 123,000 250.000 SUB TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 250,000 25.000 25.000 23.000 25.000 23,000 123.000 123,000 250.000 REHABILITATION PROJECTS 1.Santa Ana Tnai Sewer Rehab.III 5.300,000 75,000 75,000 6.225.000 5L350.0* 2.Sunflower Manhole Rehab.(1)7-21•(301�) 110.000 30.000 e0.000 30.000 110,000 3.Dyer Road Manhole Rehab.(1) 350.000 50.000 200,000 100.000 350.000 1.Ma4►D7er Manhde Rehab.(1) 350,000 60,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 5.Oroan�e•Su>•van Manhole Rehab.(1) 200.000 50.000 100.000 150,000 50.000 S.RaM St.Martltala Rehab.(1) 230.000 230.000 SUB TOTAL REIIABIIITATKINPRGJECTS T 370.000 75.000 a0.000 130,000 I30.000 300000 565000 0.703.000 7GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 7,520,000 100,000 55.000 155,000 335.000 325.000 �Y AW 5,f130.000 T • PnOah hmded b7 DkIrld He.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION AIM fitter •4111111111111 County Sanitation District No. 2 Schedule of Dlstdct Collection System ProjeEth CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEAR TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 2000.01 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOT COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACITY i 1.Replace Eudld Relief Trunk Sewer,P.1 to Edinger(1) 8.750,0w 6,750,000 8.750,000 2.Rephmnerd d Newhope Plaeentle Tnnk.2-3R(2) 6.500,000 250.000 3,000,000 3.250.000 3.250.000 6.500,000 3.Replaoemeid of Cypress Ave.Subtnnk, 24R(2) 5.750,000 250.000 2.000,000 3,000,000 500,000 5.750.000 5.750.0m 4.Taft Interceptor Sewer,2$311) 1,60Q000 1,600,o00 1,800,000 5.Batavia-Lkxaln Trunk Relief(1) 325,000 325,000 325,000 6.Boise Sewer Relief(1) 460,000 460,000 460.000 7.Santa Ana Rka Intr(SA1.R.1.)RON,2-31•(1) 13,414,000 64,000 350.000 2.000,000 5,000,000 COW.= 12.350.000 1,000,000 13.350,000 a.Carbon Canyon Dam Tnmk Sewer&P.B.AboWn.(2) 1,775.000 175,tI00 1,500,000 100,000 1,T75,000 1.775.000 SU13-TOTAL CAP,1WRO 00 CAP. 36,771,000 64. 0 175,000 2.1W.000 00 4,1 ,000 1 0.250,000 500. 00 8, 0 23.125.0001 13,5 0085,0 38,710,000 1.AbandonneM d Yorba LkMe Pimp Station (2) 200,000 50,000 50.000 150.000 200,000 2.Santa Ana Rim fair Manhole 8 Amss,2-14-SR2•(1) 5,052.000 452,000 200.000 200.000 2.000,000 2,000.000 200.000 4,600,000 4,600.000 3.91 Freeway Widening Pro)eds,2.7A•• f 05.000 92,000 13.000 13,000 13.000 4.1-5 Freeway VVIdeninp"ed.2-35 - 109.000 15,000 50.000 44,000 94.000 94.000 S.1-5 Freeway VNdenkp Projed.2-3A •• 24.000 4.000 20.000 20,000 20.000 8.Santa Ana Rim b*Shut OR Gate Replacemeff 325,000 75.000 250,000 325,000 325,000 , 7.Pump Station Improvements.2-37•(10%) 398.700 3.700 60,000 60.000 140.000 135.000 395,000 395,000 6.Miscellaneous Pmleds 600,000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100.000 SIX) 0 Mow 600.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPR011EMENTSMELIMOM 6,813,700 566.700 I 510,000 654,000 2.240,000 2,235.000 350,000 5.997,000 250.000 6.247,000 1.Euclld Trunk Martrole Rdrab.2.34R 952.000 122,000 70.000 730.000 30.000 830,000 830,000 2.South Santa Arta Rka Tank Easement.2-39 16,000 16,000 SUB-TOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 968,000 138,000 70.000 MAW 30,000 sm.000 630,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 44,555,700 768.700 763.000 3.484,000 6,370,000 10.485,000 6,650,000 29,952 000 13,635,000 13.767,000 • partlalty Mded by Odra Disulds .•Costs to be mhbrsed by Cabana 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SO4EDULEO FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION 2.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION i County Sanitation District No. 3 Schedule of DlsMct Collection System Projects. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST S YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1097-90 1998-99 1999.2000 2000-01 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANGREASE CAPACITY 1.Artesla Brandt Subb nk Relief(3) 4W.000 50.000 3W.OM 50.000 400,000 400.000 2.Westsids Relief Werceplor Parallel(3) 5.700,000 5.700.000 5.700,000 3 WAslside Relief Trunk(3) 700,000 70Q000 7W.000 4 Orange-Westem Subtnnk Relief Sewer,3-25(2) 1.207,000 57.000 10Q000 1.000.000 60,000 1.160.000 1,150,000 5.Knoll INT Relief,Orangethorpe to Artesia(3) 3.300.000 100,000 1.500,000 1,500,000 3.100,000 200,000 3.300.000 6.Hoover-Western Subtnrnk Relief on Trask(3) 1,050.000 50.000 5W.000 5W,000 1,050.000 1.050.000 7.Miller-Holder.Artesia to Hillsborough,3-38.1(2) 5,335,000 65,000 150.000 3.000,000 2,000.000 120,000 5,270.000 5.270,000 8.Miller-Holder Improv.. imperial Hwy.,3-38-3(2) 3.330,000 230,000 2,000.000 1.000.000 100,000 3,100.000 3.IW.000 9.Los Alam4os Sublrtsth Relief(3) 5.000.000 S.00 = 5.000.000 10.Magnolia Relief Swr.Wstmio.-Task,335R-1(1) 2.300,000 300.000 1,0W.000 200.000 .ZOW. D 2.DW.000 11.Slater Ave.Pump Station Roo..11-17-1(1)•(12.4%1 1.238.000 1.228.000 10.0001 10,000 10.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAP. 29,560,000 1.880.000 3.950.0001 4.200.000 00 00 2,400,0 3.420, 0 2,100,000 1 11 600,6,0W.000 , 0W_I 27.680,OW CAPITAL IMPROVEMEHTSIRELIA81LtT[ 1.Te&Ae Pipe Clam.3-36•• 2.112.000 2.012.000, 100.000 100,000 100,000 2. 1-5 Frawmq WldenYq,337"'• 43.000 13.000 20.000 10.000 30.DW 30.000 3.Raft Portion of Los Alamitos SubMm*3-6.1 65.000 50,000 15.000 15.000 15.000 4.Pump Stelion bnp"we nerds,2-37•••(14%) 558.2W 5.200 84.000 84,000 198,000 169.000 553,000 553.000 S.Miscellaneous Projects 1 1.000.000 1W.000 I IW.000 1 100.0001 1W.000 I 1WAW 500.0001 5W.000 1 1.000,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.WPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 3.7781WI 2.080.2001 319.0001 194,000 1 296.0001 289.0001 100.000 1 1.198.0001 50Q000 1 1.698.000 REHARIWATKZ PROJECTS 1.Nlefwb Street Tnnk Purdt.Rehab•(57.e%) (4) 500 000 5KOW 5W.000 2.Mallnove Tnnk Sewer Rehab,3-35R (2) 3.105.000 908,000 150,000 1,5W.000 SKOW 2,900,000 2,13W.D00 3.Seal Basch 0"Rehab.,3.11R 98.000 30.000 20,000 40.000 elt.ow 60.000 SUB-TOTAL REHAgstTATION PROJECTS 4.306.000 946.000 770,000 1 1,540.0001 550,000 1 2,880.000 8t70.000 3,380.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 37.U4.2W 4,908,200 5.049.000 5.934.000 3.246.000 I 3,709,000 1 2.200.000 20.138.000 12,600.0W 32,T36.000 • Parltally funded by District No.11 I.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION ••ClaWAppeat pending 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN •••Partially handed by Other Districts 3 MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION "•'Sd4ed to reknbursemerd by CALTRANS 4.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN A CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 5 Schedule of Dlstd t Collection System Projects. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A 0 C D E F O H I J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 1998.99 1999-20DO 200"1 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002.2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAPACITY 1.W.Coasl Kvy GrWty Tnnk Rehab,5.97-3(20%)•(1) 619,000 599,OW 20.000 20.OW 20.OW $UB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 619.000 599.000 20.0W 4 20,000 i 20.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENfSIRELIABILITY 1.Newport Blvd.6 PCH VAdenlnp,541•(42%) Ij 20.OW WOOD 20.000 180.000 180.000 2.Relocation d Lido PmV Station.$41-1"' 25.000 225.000 515.000 70.000 870.000 870.000 3.Pwp Station kMmvemtda,2-37••(28%) 10.100 108.000 168.000 392.0W 378.000 1.108.000 1.106.000 1.Mlece/anMA Pioled9 125.001) 25,000 25.000 25.000 28.OW 225.000 125.000 350.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 55.100 678.000 788.WO 1 487.0001 403.0001 25.0001 2.381.0001 125.000 1 2.500.000 REHAWLITATION PROJECTS 1.Big Canyon Tnmk Rehabilitation 12) 2.000.000 50.000 900 000 1.000.000 50,000 2.0m.000 2,0011.000 2.Beboa Parninsda Rehab WOW 8o0.0oD 5W.000 SUBTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 2.500,000 50.000 900,000 1.000.000 50.000 2.000,000 5W.00D 2,SK= GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 5.090.100 651.100 1 098.000 We,000 1.297.000 1 1.403.000 75.0W 1.101.0110 62S.o00 5,026.000 •Pertleny eroded by Diddd No.8 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION «Pargaily pawed by Dow Olstrkts 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION «•Costs psOely doted wtih Clly of Newport B-ch County Sanitation District No. 6 Schedule of District Conecdon System ftlw s CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F 0 H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST REO EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 19W99 1OW2000 2000-01 2001.02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2W7 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEM SANCREASE CAPACITY 1.W.Cow Hwy Gravity Tnnk Retrab.s•37-3(80%)•11) 2.ae.000 2.398.000 80.000 80.0W 90.0W 2.FAMm RdW. Baker SL to Nesen St.,6-12(2) 3.445.000 280.0W 1.000.000 1.7W.OW 385.0W 3.083.000 8.085.OW 3.D1*Id 8 Tnark Paald(3) 1,325,WD 25.0W 3W,000 1.000.OW 1.325,000 1.325.000 4.Dover Drive Tank ParaN(3) 1.500.000 IW,OW 1.OW,000 4W.OW 1.5W.OW 1.500.0W 5.Colape Ave.P.S.Parald F.M.(5%)"(2) 74.O00 1.500 7,5W 65.000 72.5W 72.500 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPRONEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 8.520.000 2.7T7.500 97.5W 1.00S.000 1.025.000 1.655.000 1,400.000 6,042,500 e.O42.500 1.Newport Blvd.8 PCH Wderft.5-41(58%) 277,O00 28.000 221,000 28.000 249,OWL- 241.OW 2.Vilelaon Ave/Cslfarria StrsN Sewer.613(I) 1,080,000 35.000 110,000 915.000 1,OIS,O00 ,000 3.VNder"of 1405 8ru Coda Meta 1 W.OW 100 .000 4.Amsedsnean Pro" 250,OW 25.000 25.000 25.OW 25,000 25,OW 125.000 12S .OW 5.Pump Station impmen-ft.2.37—16%) 239.200 2.200 38,OOO 38.W0 94,000 81.We 237,000 .OW SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIREUABILITY 1,928,2W 95.200 392,OW 1.004.0W 109.OW 108,0W 25.000 1.038.0W 225 .000GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT$ 10,748,2W 2,842,7W 479,5W 2,099,000 1,934,000 1,771,OW 1,425OW 7978,500 225 .&WO • PwdWy dnaed by Diddd No.5 •' PartieN Mded by District No.7 1.MASTER44ANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION Parlely funded by Olhar Districts 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 3.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 7 Schedule of District Collection System Projects_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F 0 H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REO EST REG EST REG FIVE EST S YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997.98 1998.99 1OW20M 200"1 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2W7 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE C�ACRY 1.Orange Perk Acres Tnnk Raplacemerd.7.17(2) 821.0W 37,W0 50.OW 8W.000 134,OW 784.000 784.OW 2.TusUn Air Bass FadYOes (3) 5,750.0W 150.000 2.000,000 3,000,000 5W,0W 1W,0W 5.750,000 5.750.000 3.North Tnmk Replacement(3) 2.850.000 50,0W 1.400.0W 1.000.0W 2.450.OW 2W.OW 2.6W.000 4. Gisler-Red H0i Interceptor(3) 5.300,OW 300.000 3W.OW 610W.0W 5.3W.000 5.Red Hit Irderceptor Parallel(3) 1.400,0W 1.4W.OW 1.400.000 8.Lemon Heights Sewer Repleoemerd, 7-22.1/2(3) 6.414.000 1.964,0W W50,000 I,OWAW 2.5W.000 1.000.000 3.550.000 7.Browning Tnmk Replaarnerd(3) 850,0W 8W.000 BW.000 B.Cadege Ave PS Parallel Force Mdn,7-23-1(95%)-(2) 1.405,0W 27.OW 143.000 1.235.0W 1.378.000 1.376.0W 9.Improvernerds b Main St.P.S.•7-7-1(28%)•(2) 967,0W 217,0W 850,000 100,000 750,0W 750.000 10.Main St.Pump Station ErrpanshxL 7-7-2(23%)•(3) 175.000 775.OW SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTli1114CRFJUSECAP. 25,332,000 2.115.OW 993.000 3,935.000 3.464,OW 2.IS0,000 3,100A00 13,062A00 e,450,000 22.4/2.OW TTS.000 CAPITAL IMpM&W0ffS0fREIJAVALnY 1.Pump Station WWw meats.2.3T (33%)-M 1.315,200 12.200 198,0W 108.000 462.0W 443,000 1.303.0W 1.3W,W0 2.pump Sid6on Abandonment,7-14-3 (3) 425,0W 75.000 2W,000 150.000 425.OW 425,000 3.WWAReneoas Projects 500.000 50,000 50.000 50.000 50.0W 60,0W 250.OW 250.0W 500,000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMEMSIREUABIUTY 2.240,200 12,200 248.000 323,W0 712,000 845,OW S0,000 1,9711,000 250,000 2,228,000 REHABILITATION PROJECTS 1.su dlower Manhole Rehab,7.21 (70%)••(3) 300.000 1,000 70.000 183.OW 50.OW 305.W0 305.000 2.Mlsodaneous Repair or Local Sewers (4) SAW 000 1W.000 1.200.000 1.200.000 1.2W.OW 1.200.00 4.9W.000 700.000 5.6m.000 SUBTOTAL RENA8ILITATION PROJECTS 5,9m.000 1,000 100.OW 1.270.WD I 1,385,000 1.2W.W0 1.400A00 5.205.000 700.0w 5.9115,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 33,478,100 2.158.200 1.341 AW IM8.0W 50/.000 4.345.000 4.350A00 21.14SA00 1 OA100= 30.545,0W 715AW • paroft Ra4ed by VMW lib.14 1.MASTER-PLMWED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION Pori*6rnded by OWd No.1 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN •••Peroly funded by Dlstrid No.6 3.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION ~'•Par *Itmded by Other Obirkb 4.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN 111 CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 11 Schedule of District Collection System Projects_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F 0 H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REG EST REG EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1907-98 1998-99 1OW2000 2000-01 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2W2-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACI� 1.Slater Ave.Pump Station Rapl.,11.17-1(1)•(87.8%) 6,520,000 6.450,000 70,000 70,000 70.000 2.Goldenwesl SL Sewer ReplacemaM.11-17-2 (1) 2.730.000 4d.OW 135,000 500,000 2.000.OW 50.000 2.685.000 2.80.000 3.Slater Ave.Relief(2) 1,700,000 - 1.7110.000 1.700.000 4.Hell IMereeptor(2) 3.150.000 150.000 3.OW,OW 3.150.OW 3.150.000 S.Slater/Springdale Repleownent(2) 800,000 SW.OW 800.000 8.Werner Ave Sewer Rdef M 1.500.000 1.800.000 119W.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 18,400,000 6.495,0001 205.0001 500,0001 2.000,0001 200.0001 3.000.000 5.905.000 1 4.000.000 9.905.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSAiEL1AB8JTY 1.Huntiroon BssM Purchase Abend.11.10(2) 323,000 75.000 250.0W 325,000 325.OW 2.Pump SWM Imp ovemanu.2a7(9%)"m 358.300 3.3W 54.000 $4,000 126.000 121.000 355,000 355.OW 3.Miscellaneous Pro(ectt 900.000 150.000 50.000 50.000 59.000 L3.050-OW 0,0w 350,000 250.900 900.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPR0VEMENTSIREL1A81UTY 1.283.300 3.300 279.000 354.000 178,000 111.0000.000 1.030,000 250.000 1.280.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 17.883.300 8.498.300 484.000 854.000 2,178,W0 3711M 6-935,000 1,250,000 11.185,000 • Partially funded by Dlstrld No.3 ~Partially funded by Other Dlstrlds 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 14 Schedule of Dlatriet Collection System ProJeii11-.'; CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A e C D E F O H I J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 1998.99 IM2000 2000-01 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACITY 1.Improvements to Main SI.P.S.,7-7-1(72%)•(1) 2,120,000 195.000 1,875.000 250.000 1,925,000 1.e25.000 2.Main Street Pump Station EiVenaion,7.7-2(72%)"(?) 2,000,000 2.000,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CM. �-4,120.0001193.000 1.W5A00 250.000 1.923.000 .1,025.000 2.000.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY I.MbedwMan Ptaleds 250,000 25.000 25,4100 25.000 25.000 25,000 125.000 125.000 250.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIREL A RM 250.000 25,000 23,000 25.OW 25,000 25.000 125.000 125,000 250,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS /.370,000 1 195.000 1.700.0001 275,000 1 25.0001 25.000 1 25.000 2,050.000 1 125.0001 2.175,000 1000,000 • Parda8y tinted by DI*Id No.? •'Future Construc0on►near 2020.partl*tended by D.7 1.MASTER44 ANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION t� ' RESOLUTION NO. 97-33-7 INITIATING PROPOSAL TO CONSOLIDATE DISTRICTS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 APPLYING TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 56000, ET SEG . WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts were originally formed and organized in 1947-48 as separate districts providing sewer services, generally following the drainage patterns of Orange County; and, WHEREAS, Orange County's sewer system is now well-established, and the current main focus of the nine districts is on joint projects and the attendant regulatory issues; and, WHEREAS, over the years, the continuation of the nine districts as separate entities has contributed to certain administrative and financial burdens; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Part 3 of Division 3 of Title 5 of the Government Code, known as the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 ("the Act"), certain local agencies may make request to the Local Agency Formation Commission for a change of organization or a reorganization; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 7 is a local agency authorized to make such a proposal; and, i� h' WHEREAS, "consolidation" is one type of change of organization or reorganization permitted by the Act, defined as the uniting or joining of two or more districts, formed pursuant to the same principal act, into a single new successor district; and, WHEREAS, notice of intent to adopt this resolution of application has not been given to each interested and each subject agency as is permitted, but not required by Government Code Section 56800(b); and, WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be consolidated is inhabited; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of streamlining administration and Board procedures, maintaining financial and other records, and reducing costs, it has been determined by the District that the proposed consolidation will effect substantial administrative benefits and financial savings, both individually and collectively. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: This proposal for a change of organization is made pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 2: The change of organization proposed herein is the consolidation of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 into a single County Sanitation District, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. Section 3: The boundaries of the affected nine districts are as depicted in Exhibit "A", attached. The boundaries of the proposed consolidated district are as depicted in Exhibit "B", attached. Section 4: Terms and conditions of the proposed consolidation regarding consolidation of assets and financial obligations are set forth on Exhibit "C", attached. Section 5: The number and method of selection of members of the governing Board shall be as provided in California Government Code Section 4730.65. Section 6: The following person is to be furnished with copies of the report by the Executive Officer and to be given mailed notice of the hearing on the proposal: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Section 7: This proposal is to be considered a formal request that proceedings for consolidation be taken pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 8: A plan for providing services within the affected territory is attached as Exhibit "D". Section 9: The effective date of the consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 24, 1997. H:\wp.dta\admin\BS\RES\RES97\97-33-7.doc STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, PENNY KYLE, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97-33-7 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board on the 24th day of September, 1997, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Thomas R. Saltarelli, Chair; Jan Debay; James M. Ferryman; Pat McGuigan NOES: William G. Steiner ABSENT: Mark A. Murphy; Christina Shea IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, this 24th day of September, 1997. Penny Kygir/lectbrs S etary Board of of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange ornia r h a H:\wp.dta\admin\BS\FGRMS\97\F13.033.7.doc EXHIBIT A— Map of Current Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, wNIrnER BLvo Q,9'4�e� LA HABRA 9tic 9'l•9n LAMBERT RO 4 .�C RO IMPERIAL HWV B EAcOG•l,�l- BABTANCNURV Ib L STON roRBA UNOA 8LV0 YORBA MA`veRN CHAPMAN AVE L ACENTIA LINDA Ov I I 2 Q� UENA P C� ALM ��=K o � u a� I ANAHEIM W VILLA O RO-LL CYPRE S I W TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON 3 LAMITOS C O I RAN E � � s s W N> 1[ n CNA/NAN AV8 = `g GARDEN GRO STMI, STE S I I we LAVE ITN ST B 1 Tus , � MC F OEN ST qLy� gSANT 11 W o ANA� WARNER AVE 8 FQUNTA + i El US AVEYALLEY HUN IN N AOAMS A O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE `aJ P4' O5 g ' NEW PORT BEACH . N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS "OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 EXHIBIT B — Map of Proposed Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S wNITnER ELVO 94, LA HABRA 4� �941 LA W MEAT RO IW/ERIAL NwV BREA eASTA NURY RO rp L ON roReA uNOA MALVERN YOR BA CHA►WAN AVG LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� J2� I ORANoerwo AVE �Q F O p �UE A A I o L P� K 1 �C9 PALM UN=LN AV > ANAHEIM W 10g @ALLROI CYPRESS I VILLA dO TA PARK AVE LOS STANTON g LAMITOS I m RANGE W ` � • ~ > W Y e CMA/WNN AVB iI » r`�+ GRO GARDEN STMIII S S` wesrwNsreR I.ve tTiN Sr ' B = W `3 t IMC R TUS tN ST a g SANT F' W o ANA wARNeR Ave 8 FQUNTA I , V ALIS AVE ALLEY I e ,� HUNTINGT4N AOAWS A GJ C9 y! .PACIFIC A MN AVE COST .00EAN MESA IRVINE S P� !4 NEWPORT BEACH N SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Exhibit C LAFCO Application Terms & Conditions Consolidation of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1. The nine separate districts known jointly as the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ("CSDOC") shall be consolidated into one single county sanitation district pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code Sections 4730 et seq.) and shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County ("District'). [G.C. §56844(v)] (As used herein, "CSDOC" refers to the nine Districts, both jointly, singly and in any combination.) 2. As a result of consolidating, the nine existing districts shall be dissolved and be reorganized as one consolidated District with one consolidated Board of Directors under California Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. At the time of consolidation, the Board of Directors would include representatives from the following jurisdictions: [G.C. §56844(n)] • County (1) - County of Orange Unincorporated Area • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Santa Ana Buena Park La Habra Seal Beach Cypress La Palma Stanton Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Tustin Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District 3. Directors of District shall be compensated in accordance with applicable state law. Page 1 4. All system facilities shall be transferred from existing CSDOC to District as of the effective date of consolidation in an "as-is" condition, without any payment or repair obligation from CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(k)(v)] 5. All lands, buildings, real and personal property, assets and appurtenances held by CSDOC, as of the effective date of the consolidation, shall be transferred to District. Such assets are enumerated in the CSDOC Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ending June 30, 1997. [G.C. §56844(b)] 6. District shall be designated as the successor to CSDOC and retain all of the rights, duties and obligations of the former CSDOC with respect to enforcement, performance or payment of any outstanding bonds, contracts or obligations of the former CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(m)] 7. All previously authorized charges, fees assessments and/or taxes currently in effect by CSDOC shall be continued by District. [G.C. §56844(t)] 8. The establishment of Special Zones within District, pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 4850 et seq., shall be effected on July 1, 1998 and shall collectively include any or all portions of the entire CSDOC service area and individually include the specified areas as shown on the nine attached maps. The existing rate schedules within each of the Special Zones shall continue as presently in effect by each District within CSDOC until such time as amended by the District's Board of Directors. The annual sewer service charge can only be amended by a vote of two-thirds of all members of the governing body. [G.C. §56844(e)] 9. All agreements by and between any two or more existing CSDOC's, including but not limited to: joint sewer ownership or use, construction or maintenance of facilities, shall be terminated upon the effective date of the consolidation. The termination of the agreements is appropriate in recognition of the new District assuming full and exclusive ownership and authority over all rights, duties and obligations of all existing CSDOC's. 10. To the extent not inconsistent with the terms of the consolidation, and as necessary to carry out the original intent, all contracts between the Irvine Ranch Water District and one or more existing CSDOC's, including those relating to ownership of capacity rights in treatment, disposal and sewer facilities, shall be assigned to District and remain in full force and effect. All contracts between County Sanitation District No. 14 and one or more Page 2 CSDOC's shall also be assigned to the new District and remain in full force and effect. 11. CSDOC shall transfer any and all indebtedness and the obligation to levy taxes, charges, assessments, or fees in order to make payment of said indebtedness to District. [G.C. §56844(c)] 12. CSDOC shall file a statement with LAFCO that the reorganization shall not adversely affect or impair the status of any employee of CSDOC or District. As of the effective date of this reorganization, all employees of CSDOC shall become employees of District. Rates of pay, accrued vacation and sick leave, vacation and sick leave accrual rates, employee rights, insurance, retirement benefits, and all other benefits and programs shall be transferred over to District at then-current levels. Memoranda of Understanding in place under CSDOC shall be transferred to the new District. [G.C. §56844(I)] 13. Permits issued to CSDOC by any federal, state or local regulatory authority, shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties as contained within the permits and to continue operations without interruption. Such permits shall include but not be limited to: CSDOC's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit, including a waiver for full secondary treatment pursuant to Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act, and all other air and land permits. [G.C. §56844(v)] 14. Permits issued by CSDOC shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties contained in said permits and in the laws authorizing the issuance of said permits. Such permits shall include but not be limited to Sewer Connection Permits and Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permits. [G.C. §56844(c)] 15. District shall assume all existing contracts and obligations presently in full force and effect with CSDOC and which have not otherwise been specifically referenced herein. [G.C. §56844(m)] 16. The effective date of this consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. [G.C. §56844(p)] Page 3 Map of Special Zone 1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, WHIrnER BLVD 0,9 14' 6 LA HABRA LAMBERT RO F 9' IMPERIAL N W Y B EA BASTAN NURY I r� YORBA LINDA BLVD O L ON YORBA 13 MALVERN CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� �i/ J� OM ETNO AVE 2 O 5 UE A ��� �,0 PALM uN LN AV PA K 5 ANAHEIM o VILLA O BALL RD CYPRESS TA VE PARK LOS W STANTON RAN E m LAMITOS 3 s < > Y m CNAPMAN AVE S a c J�� GARD N o GRO STMI S SE WESTMINSTER VE B K 7 u i TUS W m J 8 _ F UNTA 1 E LISAVE ALLEY , C r HUN INGOT N ADAMS AVAI6 9 O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE O5 g ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY s w- WNITTIER BLVO On q•Ye� LA HABRA LAMBERT RO Cc / IMPERIAL NW V . Y O�1 O eAa ' L ON bDRBA La1Ow slut YORBA MALVERN 13 CNAPMAN AVE LACENTIA L1NDA OM ETMO AVE QJ O �G UE A O LA PA MA uPA K 5 ANAHEIM Q R Y S BALL o aA C RE I LOS W STANTON LAMITOS a . [ RAN:4. N > b CNA/MAN AV :?:S >:;:.;:.::Al < L b STMI S SE wESTA1INSTER VE 17TN ar B c 7 u < 1 TUS 0 b O' sMC. N sr 110 Si g W m ANA WARNER AVE J 8 F DUNTAOF- + I E U ALLEY SAVE iti�C it HUN IN N J � O PACIFIC MILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE r� �e `Q' P4r O5 �~ ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �e.e w ra[s OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 3 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 0 w«irnsA ewo>:: O9�9ti F 6 `>:LA:HABRA �� �tiC 9tiq LIMBERr RD:: ��p/PEAtAL MWY COG�O/-ro B EA �' cDG"A►AJ� BASTA NURY MARA UNDA BLVD !MAWERN.. L- ON YORBA 1.3 CNAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 92� O UI` A PALAA z uPrA K E c, �lN�4HE[M o VILLA O O 'CY R: 5:::>::::»'.>:::;:>:>:> Re.. .... , vE PARK LAMITO ! ; s RAN E :CNAPMAfGAYb S oWo GRO ST11f1E. ;; . SE 17M sr u �! 1 T us mc P N ST SANT A WARNER AvE W J ..AVF ALLEY e`` ,v c F � o ADAMB:AV : 6 �g O PACIFIC AWLTON AYE COST OCEAN MESA �'° IRVINE ONEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .nnA a rw OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 5 LOS ANGELES COUNTY %2 A• WNI"ER BLVD LA HABRA e9 �9'�.I, eF9 LAMBERT RD cFc�g9oww-- IMPERIAL HWV OG /•rO B EA BASTA NURY L ON YORBA LINDA BLVD ' AMLVERN YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA ORA ETIO AVE I 2 LA �., PALMA LI FA K 5 ANAHEIM a VILLA rD BALL RD CY RE S I VE PARK TA LOS STANTON 3 N LAMITOS O RAN E 3 > Y e CNAPMAN AVB I n GARDEN GRO STMI S SE. WESTMINSTER VE 1TTN ST C e `s 7 W O TUS = MC F N ST i'gJ.tY g SANT 4 W m ANA WARNER AVE 8 F UNTA : !, E S AVE ALLEY c F � HUN INGTON � EAQJ ADAMS A O PACIFIC COST ' OCEAN MESA° '`'"`"'``` IRVINE 5 N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 6 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, wNIrnER BLVD 9ti LA HABRA �� 09gti 6F9� LAMBERT AD W, C q9OA- IM►ERIALNWV O/_ ',rC• B// EA BASTANCNURYip L ON YORBA LINDA BLVD MALVERN YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'G� 9 GOJ�� ORA E711O AVE I �l �'O C �5 UE A L O �., LA �O PALM uN FA K eALLRD CY RE S NAHEIM a VILLA O T VE PARK LOS STANTON 3 LAMITOS O I m RAN E v 3 dI o m s Dcot UP ` 5 > Y e CNAPMAN AV S N o ��� GAR D N GRID STMI S SE wEBTMI PHI STER vE 17TN Sr e 7 < Y w u < O TUS F � MC F EN ST a SANT 11 W ANA wARNER AVE J J 8 F UNT r� t E UBAVE ALLEY a �� Q9 FCF HUN IN N ADAMS A cc y x. PACIFIC AMILTONAVE COSZ. OCEAN IRVINE O5 �~ ' NEWPORT BEACH COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS N N rwA a rate OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 7 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, WNITTER BLVD C+ '94, LA HABRA LAMBERT RD IMPERIAL NWV pp E C�Gw•O/"�'OC BASTAHBNUR' OG L ON voRBA uNw Blvo MALVERN YORBA 13 CNA►MAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� GOJ� OM ETNO AVE �O �y LA �C9 PALM LAN IPNAAVE K oy ANAHEIM a VILLA O BALL RD CY PRE114, T AVE PARK LOS ; STANTON 3 LAMITOS = O RAN E W tt W > Y m CNA►MAN AVE S y m y�� GAR D N ° r GRO STMI S SE wESTWNSTER AVE= 17T1 ST 9 s W 7.. MC F EN ST 11 g SANT W m ANA WARNER AVE 1 E US AVE ALLEY i t q P C F HUN INGT N 4P �fF 4r o° 9O r AOAMS AVBg O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE ONEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS cwawrw OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 11 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, WNITTIER BLVO q-r LA HABRA L^Jd �9gti^^eF9q,n IAMSERT RO �( V� �•' IMPERIAL HWV 11rr C'O(��O�tiOC B EA BASTAN NURY RO YORBA UNOA BLVO L ON MALVERN YORBA 13 CNAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� J� ORA{gET110 AVE 2 Q �y LPALM u„�UE L AV K �, ANAHEIM a VILLA O � SALL Ro CY RE S I TA VE PARK LOS W STANTON RAN E LAMITOS ¢ 12 j 0 O O W O S > Y m CNA►MAN AV S u o �+ GAR D N GRO STMI S S` VWESTASNSTER VE 17711 ST 3 W O TUS m MC F DDEN ST ..... SANT `F 14 ANA WARNER AVE F UNTA r` E S AVE ALLEY c J,Q9 FryrF9 Gr HUN :NO TON oq ADAMS AVq O PACIFIC wgaoNwr: COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE ?�� 'P O5 g ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 13 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 3, WN rml BLVD ✓ 0' 'q� LA HABRA %9k LAMBERT RD v`e-r�90 IMPERIAL NWV YY B EA SASTAN,NURY L ON YORBA LINDA BLVD RBA MALVERN YO 9 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA oaA E o Av O ►1D ETN J 2 F O >:; O G i O CO UE A LA PALM PA K 5 ANAHEIM m O BALL Ro CY RE S I o VILLA TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON m 0 RAN E pa LAMITOS ` pQ F W O 1 O ¢ m J > 7- 1- { GAR CNAPA/AN AV6 S N y o D GRO S STMI SE WESTMINSTER MVE 1TT11 ST B 7 W u < O� e TUS MC F DDEN ST 11 g SANT W m ANA WARNER AVE J 8 F U NTA r` 1 E US AVE a�PP ' c�ryfF9 HUN INGT N FcF ADAMSAVII4J �9 9 O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA 0'° IRVINE 5 ?TP NEWPORT BEACH ' N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' °Cll{AMYW OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S WHITTIER BLVD q� LA HABRA ogq�I• eFq LAMBERT RD CICC�qqaw- IMPERIAL HWV 0/. ,•YD V C B BASTA NURV TORBA LINDA BLVD L ON MALVERN YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9 ORANGETNO AVE j 2 GOJ�� �5 LIE A L. �.. LA PALM U LN PARK 05 I VVEE11 ANAHEIM VILLA db "U.RD CYPRESS i W TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON 3 LAMITOS C O S AN E L. i. x CHAPMAN AVE Z H M W r GARDEN GRO STMI S S WESTMINSTE VE 17TN ST B s W 7 G 1 e O T us MC F DDEN Sr f 11 � o SANT g O = m ANA W WARNER AVE i r 8 F r UNTA 0 I P 1 ELUS AVE ALLEY � I P HUN IN N : > ADAMS A O 6 PACIFIC AMI LTON AVE COST ` OCEAN o tRV1 E MESA r Q e P 1 J r 1 O 'e ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS iMA W Y W OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Exhibit D Plan of Services for the Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County L INTRODUCTION This Plan of Services has been prepared pursuant to Govemment Code Section 56653, which requires that a plan for providing services within the affected territory be provided whenever an application for a change of organization is submitted to LAFCO. This document will facilitate the consolidation of the nine (9) existing County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) into one single County Sanitation District pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq. The resulting consolidated agency shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County (District). This consolidation proposes a transfer of all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of CSDOC to the District. The Plan of Services provides a description of CSDOC and its operations and how they will be consolidated as the District. IL DESCRIPTION OF CSDOC A. General Information The CSDOC is made up of nine independent special districts. Each district is a political subdivision of the State of California and is governed by a representative of each city and sanitary district within the district and, if the District includes unincorporated territory, a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Each district has its own budget. All districts except District Nos. 13 and 14 have their own tax rate and trunk sewer systems. District No. 13 buys capacity in the other districts' transmission facilities. A Joint Administrative Organization was formed in 1948 to administer the business of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities and the activities common to all districts. This is provided for in a Joint Ownership Operation and Construction Agreement. The day-to-day operation of the organization is under the direction of a General Manager, one assistant general manager, eight department heads, for an authorized staff of 560 full time equivalents for the Fiscal Year 1997-98. B. Types of Services, Level, and Range of Service Currently Provided The CSDOC is a single-purpose public entity formed solely for the collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater and its residuals and serves the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal needs of approximately 2.2 million people. During 1996-1997, an average daily sewage influent flow of 244 million gallons per day (MGD)was treated and 510 wet tons per day of residual solids (biosolids) was produced. CSDOC encompasses a 470 square-mile area of Orange County that includes 23 of the County's 31 cities. CSDOC operates the third largest wastewater management agency of its kind west of the Mississippi, with assets valued at more than$1 billion dollars. The nine individual districts own about 650 miles of major trunk sewers, 22 pumping stations and two major treatment plants with disposal facilities to safely discharge the treated effluent through an ocean outfall into deep ocean waters. The treatment plants process an average of 244 million gallons of wastewater per day. Page 1 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley. It has a current operational primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 108 MGD and a secondary treatment capacity of 66 MGD currently being expanded to 80 MGD. Treatment Plant No. 2 is in Huntington Beach. It has a primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 186 MGD. Plant No. 2 provides advanced primary treatment to all of the wastewater that enters the plant and secondary treatment to up to 90 MGD of the total flow. Table 1 highlights the service area characteristics and system features. Table 1 Service Area Joint Works Facilities.-As of June 30. 1997 Total Population Served (estimated) 2,275,000 Service Area (estimated) 470 square miles Total Number of Cities Served 23 Total Miles of Trunk Sewers 650 Number of Pumping Stations 22 Number of Treatment Plants 2 Primary Treatment Capacity (includes standby) Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 Total Primary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 MGD Secondary Treatment Capacity Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 Total Secondary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . 156 MGD Total Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450 MGD Reported Average Daily Flow Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 MGD Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 MGD Total Average Daily Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 MGD Page 2 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service C. Description of Sanitary Sewer System CSDOC processes wastewater from the collection systems of the various cities, water districts and local sewer agencies. They do not deal directly with individual customers except for portions of District No. 7, which is located primarily in unincorporated territory of the County near Tustin. CSDOC's assets consist of individual district assets and each district's respective share of jointly owned assets. Table 2 summarizes the respective District ownership in jointly owned and separately owned property, plant, equipment and construction in progress, at cost, as of June 30, 1997: Table 2 District Ownership Jointly Owned Separately Owned Total Total property, plant and equipment $804,200,000 $321,300,000 $1,135,500,000 Less accumulated $310,200,000 depreciation Net property, plant and equipment $825,300,000 D. Additional Assets In addition to its real property and facilities, CSDOC owns service vehicles, equipment, tools, repair parts inventory, and communications and office equipment. CSDOC maintains cash, liquid securities to meet its cash flow requirements, and other reserves. The following table summarizes the districts' reserves budgeted for the end of Fiscal Year 1996-97. Table 3 Reserves Analysis "Dry Period" Operating Cash Flow $28,021,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,221,000 Debt Service Reserves Fund Balance 59,724,000 Capital Reserves 49,233,000 Environmental Requirements Reserves 4,484,000 Flood/Earthquake Insurance Reserves 81,450,000 Rate Stabilization Funds 141,200,000 Total $375,333,000 Page 3 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service E. Liabilities As of June 30, 1997, CSDOC liabilities included debt in the amount of approximately $397,575,000. These issues include $397,45,000 of Certificates of Participation (COP) and $30,000 of general obligation (G.O.) bonds. The Districts have maintained their AA- rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and Aa rating from Moody's Investor Services, although all COP issues are backed by issuance of letters of credit and are rated AAA. The Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget provides for$32,620,000 to service the debt on the various COPS issued. In addition, there is a $15,000 annual payment to maturity in January 1999 for the G.O. bonds in District No. 1 1. Consolidation of the districts will have no impact on the liabilities of CSDOC. Under consolidation into a single County Sanitation District, the new County Sanitation District assessments all predecessor district obligations. Further, the districts are presently joined by agreement to manage and fund liabilities. The new consolidated District will establish special zones upon consolidation to continue differential user fees and to ensure that predecessor districts' outstanding debt is serviced by only those residents who originally assumed that debt. The boundaries of each zone will be the same as those of each predecessor district. The new consolidated District will establish nine (9) zones to differentiate and account for costs, revenues and liabilities of the existing districts. In addition, an Improvement District (ID) could be formed coincident with each predecessor district's service area to enable proper segregated accounting for the retirement of the existing Certificates of Participation (COPs) debt. As new future borrowing may occur, new ID's would be formed to include the service area benefiting from the projects. Such new ID's would not necessarily have boundaries congruent with the zones. For projects at the treatment plants, however, an ID to include all of the new District's service area could be formed to properly allocate the cost of such improvements that would benefit all the zones. It is also expected that the consolidated District would continue the practice of dedicating Ad Valorem Taxes where it would be collectable within a zone to the retirement of long-term debt of an appropriate ID. F. Management and Employees CSDOC presently operates in a consolidated fashion pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code Section 4840 et seq. CSDOC currently employs approximately 560 full-time employees. Legal Services are provided by the law firm of Woodruff, Spradlin and Smart auditing services are also provided by contract. In addition, various other services are contracted-out. These include such varied services as groundskeeping, environmental review, ocean research and reporting, etc. CSDOC's organization chart is included in CSDOC's Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget which is submitted along with this application. The existing net joint operation budget for Fiscal Year 1997-98 is $46,922,650. Consolidation of the districts into a single District would result in the continuation of management and operational structures and functional expenditures similar to those described above. Operations of the new District would remain the same as the current operations of CSDOC. Consequently, there would be no change in employee compensation and employee benefits as adjustments would not be required. The transition from the existing joint operation to a single District operation would have no impact on employees, their occupational status, or their benefits. Page 4 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service G. Rates and Charges Each district, except District No. 14, has an adopted Sanitary Sewer Service Fee to provide funding for operating the sewer systems in accordance with the Clean Water Act and CSDOC's Revenue Program. District No. 14 is funded through the payment of an annual charge by the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) directly to CSDOC. IRWD levies and collects individual user charges from each parcel receiving service. Sanitary Sewer Service Fees are set annually by each district after a review of projected needs. In May, 1997, The Board of Directors adopted a user rate increase fee schedule that provides for gradual rate increase over the next five years for six of the nine districts. This represents that first user rate increase in seven years. The Districts have been able to avoid user fee increases by reducing operational costs through reorganizing and streamlining Districts operations, holding vacant positions open, and deferring new facilities. However, because the Districts'capital improvement program's debt service obligations continued to increase beyond the level of its primary funding source, i.e. property tax revenues, and because of the additional capital improvement requirements, increase in user fees became inevitable. The following is the adopted Annual Sewer Service Fee Rate Schedule District 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 1 $91.36 $100.27 $110.04 $120.77 $132.55 2 $73.00 $75.00 $77.00 $80.00 $82.00 3 $75.00 $76.00 $77.00 $78.00 $80.00 5 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 6 $78.00 $80.00 $82.00 $84.00 $86.00 7 $55.00 $60.00 $66.00 $73.00 $80.00 11 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 $101.25 $113.91 13 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 As was indicated previously, establishment of special zones upon consolidation would continue the existing schedules of differential Sanitary Sewer Service Fees until such time as amended by action of the governing body. Said fees shall not be amended without a two- thirds vote of all members of the governing body. Consolidation is expected to facilitate reorganizing and streamlining the new District's operations. H. Summary of Revenues and Expenses The CSDOC Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget, which is included in this application package, contains detailed information regarding revenues and expenses. Attention is called to Section 3, pages 1-13, of the Budget document for summary information. Ill, DESCRIPTION OF THE CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT A. General Page 5 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service The nine independent County Sanitation Districts currently collectively known as CSDOC, and which utilize joint operating, working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, will be consolidated into a single County Sanitation District pursuant to the California County Sanitation District Act(Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq.). The boundaries of the consolidated District will be the same as the outer boundaries of those nine predecessor districts. B. Types of Services, Level and Range of Services The new District will assume all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of the former CSDOC. The District will own and operate the wastewater treatment system which provides sewage collection, treatment and disposal services currently owned and operated by the nine (9) Sanitation Districts known jointly as CSDOC. C. District Structure The District' s organization will be the same as that structure which presently exists under the CSDOC joint operating agreement for the operation and administration of the joint facilities. D. Governing Board Composition The new District will be formed under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65. Under Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65, the governing body of the consolidated District would be made up of a 25-member board representing local cities, sanitary districts and the County of Orange unincorporated area. Board membership would decrease from 29 to 25 with the loss of double representation for the Cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Yorba Linda and the County of Orange. The proposed governing Board formed under Section 4730.65 would include the following agencies: • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Tustin Buena Park La Habra Santa Ana Cypress La Palma Seal Beach Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Stanton Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District I • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District • County (1) -County of Orange (to represent the Unincorporated Areas) Page 6 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service E. Three Year Budget of the Consolidated District It is anticipated that revenues and expenditures which would have been budgeted by CSDOC for the operation and administration of joint facilities and the construction of capital improvements will be the basis for the new District's financial plan. Attachment A is a 3-year projection of the District's budget under consolidation. The projection covers Fiscal Years 1998-99, 1999-2000 and 2000-2001. Attachment B is a summary of anticipated capital improvements for the new District. This summary of capital needs was derived from CSDOC's Joint Works Capital Improvements Budget. lV IMPACTS ON CUSTOMERS There will be no negative financial impact on customers. No rate changes are anticipated as a result of the consolidation. Please refer to previous discussion regarding the formation of special zones. V. IMPACTS ON OTHER JURISDICTIONS There will be no service level impacts on any of the cities, sanitary districts, and other agencies presently relying on services provided by CSDOC as the services responsibilities, without modification, will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Effective date is proposed as July 1, 1998. IMPACTS ON REGIONAL PARTICIPATION All CSDOC's contractual obligations will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Accordingly, there are no anticipated impacts. Page 7 915/97 Consolidated Sanitation Distrct of Orange County Proiected Budoets Fiscal Years 1998-99 Thru 2000-01 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000 2001 Revenues Industrial/Commercial Use Fees $ 9,317,000 $ 10,714,000 $ 12,322,000 Sewer Service Fees 65,938,000 68,907,000 7 ,436,000 Fees From Other Agencies 6,150,000 4,700,000 5,250,000 Connection Fees 6,784,000 81065,000 9,727,000 Interest 22,443,000 22,420,000 21,749,000 Miscellaneous &Other 2,640,500 4,141,500 4,141,500 Property Taxes 30,572,000 30,565,000 30,562,000 New COP Issues 53,200,000 67,000,000 62,400,000 Total Revenues $ 197,044,500 $ 206,512,500 $ 218,587,500 Requirements Collection System O&M Expenses $ 9,553,000 $ 10,804.000 $ 10,527.000 Treatment System O&M Expenses 47,861,000 48,818,000 49,794,000 Collection System Improvements 20,997,000 24,902,000 26,497,000 Treatment System Improvements 70,086,000 78,429,500 96,380,500 GO Bond Principal&Interest 16,000 16,000 - Costs of New COP Issuance 2,660,000 2,850,000 3,120,000 COP Service&Retirement 37,772,000 42,590,000 47,834,000 Total Expenses $ 188,945,000 $ 208,409,500 $ 234,152,500 Revenue Exceeding Expenses $ 8,099,500 $ (1,897,000) $ (15,565,000) Beginning Cash Balances 385,031,450 393,130,950 391,233,950 Ending Cash Balances $ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,668,950 Appropriations, Dedications & Reserves "Dry Period"Operating Cash Flow $ 28,800,000 $ 30,121,000 $ 30,737,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,483,000 11,925,000 12,064,000 Capital Projects Completion 49,995,000 49,946,200 49,540,100 Environmental Requirements Reserve 4,634,000 4,484,000 4,484,000 Required Debt&COP Service Reserves 38,359,000 41,133,000 44,230,000 "Dry Period"COP Service Cash Flow 27,705,350 31,244,600 35,022,350 Property& I-lability Catastrophe Reserve 89,752,850 90,971,850 91,208,250 Rate Stabilization Funds 142,401,750 131,408,300 108,383,250 •$ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,668,950 Unappropriated Cash & Investment Balances $ - $ - $ - i County Sanitation District No. 1 MENOMONEE acMdu%of VI9ft a CoftdIm 8j @t 111 daces CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REG EST REG EST RED FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1097.98 /99d99 IM2008 2000-01 2MI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2001 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMMMENTSIRELIABIL I.Miscellaneous Pra(eds 250.000 25.000 25.000 n.000 25.000 29.000 125,000 125.000 250.000 ,SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 250.000 25.000 25.000 25,000 25.000 25.000 125,000 125.000 250,000 REHABILITATION PROJECTS 1.Smile Ana?rank Sewer Rehab.11) 6.300,000 75.000 15.000 6.22S.000 6.300.000 2.Sunflower Manhole Rehab.(117.21•(30%) 140,000 30.000 80.000 30.000 140.000 140,000 3.07ar Road Manhole Rehab.111 350.000 50,000 200.000 100.000 350,000 350.000 4.Main-DYa Maid Rehab.(1) 350,000 50.000 100.000 100,000 200.000 350.000 5.OroenvOWSulhan Manhole Rehab.(1) 200 000 50.000 100,000 I50.000 60.000 200A00 S.Rald SL Maaale Rehab.(1) 230.000 230.000 230,000 $MTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 7.570.000 75.000 30.0001 130.0001 330,0001 865.0001 0.705,000 7.670.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 7.920.000 100.000 55,000 1 155.000 355.000 326,000 ON.= S,fl30,000 T,620,000 • Partially hmded by Obbld No.T 1.MASTER44 ANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 2 Schedule of Dlstrlct Collection System ProjeaW CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F 0 H I J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST RE17 EST REO EST REG EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARc TEN COST TO PROJECT TO2020 PURCHASES 1997-08 1998-99 IM2000 2000.01 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOT COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACITY 1.Replace Euclid Renef Trunk Sewer.P.1 to E fter(1) 6.750.000 6,750,000 6.750,000 2.Replacemerd ofNewhope Plaoentis Tank 2-3R(2) 8,500,000 250.000 3,000,000 3,250,000 3,250,000 6,500,000 m 3.Replaoeerd of Cypress Ave.Subtr nk, 24R(2) 5.750,000 250,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 500,000 5,750,000 5.750.000 4.Tan Interceptor Sewer,2-8-3(1) 1,800,o00 1.800.000 1.800.000 5.Batavl&Akreckt Trunk Relief(1) 325,000 325,000 325.000 6.Bdsa Sewer Relld(1) 460.000 460,000 460.000 7.Santa Ana River Intr(S.A.R.1.)Relief.2-31•(1) 13,414,000 64.000 350.000 2,000.000 5,000.000 5,000,000 12.350.000 LOW,= 13,350.000 8.Carbon Canyon Dam Tnnk Sewer&P.S.Abarn.(2) 1,775,000 175,000 1,500.000 100.000 1.775.000 1.775,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPRO 00 CAP. 36,774,000 64, 0 100 75, 0 00 2,t ,1100 4,100,000 00 8.250. 0 8,500= 23.125.000 1 ,000 36,3.R 710,000 CAPITAL RAPPAAMMENtSIMAB 1.Abandonment d Yorba Linda Pimp Station (2) 200.000 50.000 50.o00 150.000 200,000 2.Santa Ana River trrV Manhole&Access,2-14-W."1) 5.052.000 452,000 200,000 200,000 2,OW.000 2.000,000 200.000 4,800.000 4.600,000 3.91 Freeway VAdenhp Projects.2-7A•' 105.000 92.000 13.000 13.000 13,000 4.1.5 Freeway Wdenlnp Project.2-35 •• 109.000 15,000 50.000 44.000 94.000 94.000 S.1.5 Freeway VAdenlnp Project.2-3A •• 24,000 4,000 20.000 20.000 20,000 S.Sara Ana River b*Shut Oft Gate Replacemett 325.000 75.000 250.000 325.000 325.000 7.Pump Station Improvements,2-37•(10%) 398.700 3.700 60.000 60,000 140.000 135.000 395,000 395.000 8.Mimilaneous projects 600.000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100.000 1110.000 500.000 100,000 600,000 SUBTOTAL CAP.iMpROVEMENTSIRELIASAM 8.813.7t10 566,700 516,000 654,000 I 2.240,000 Z235,000 350,000 5.997.000 250.000 6.247,000 REHABILITATION PRIDECTS 1.Euclid Tank Manhole Rehab,2-34R 952.000 122.000 70,000 730.000 30,000 830,000 830,000 2.South Sera Ana River Thank Easement,2J9 10,000 16,000 SUB-TOTAL RE14ABIL ITAT)ON PROJECTS 966,000 138.000 70,000 730.000 30,000 830,000 630,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL wROVEMENTS 44,555.700 1 768.700 763.000 3,484,000 6.370,000 10.485.000 8,850,000 29.952.000 13,835,000 43.787,000 • Pertlally landed by Other Distrlds ••Costs to be relnbursad by Caltrans 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION 2.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN 3 CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 3 Schedule of Dlstrld Collution System Projssts- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C 0 E F 0 H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG WE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1991-98 1998-99 1999.2000 2000-01 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACRY 1.Artesia Brandt Stbbvtt Rebal 13) 100,000 50,000 300.000 50,000 400,000 400.000 2.Wastside Rebel Interceptor Parallel(3) 5.700.000 5,700,000 5,700,000 3.Wdstsde Rebel Tnnk(3) 700,000 700,000 700,000 4.Orange-Western Stbtnrtt Rebel Sewer,3-25(2) 1.207,000 57.000 100,000 1,000,000 50,000 1,150,000 1,150,000 S.Knoll INT Reliel,Orangethorpe to Artesia(3) 3.300.000 100,000 1.500.000 1,500,000 3,100.000 200,000 3,300,000 6.Hoover-Western Stbhu*Relief on Trask(3) 1,050.000 50.000 500.000 500.000 1,050.000 1,050,000 7.Mblw-Holder,Artesia to Hillsborough,3-39-1 12) 5.335.000 85,000 150.000 3.000,000 2,000.000 120,000 6.270.000 5.270,000 8.Miller-Holder Inpmv., Imperial Hwy.,3-38-3(2) 3.330,000 230,000 2.000.000 1.000.000 100.0W 3,100.000 3.100.000 9.Los Afamios Subtnr*Rebel(3) 5,000.000 5,000,000 5,000,000 10,Magnolia Rebel Swr.Wstmin.-Task,335R-1(1) 2.300.000 300.000 1,800.000 200.000 .Z000.000 2.000.000 11.Sister Ave.Pump Station Roo.,11-17-1(1)'112.4%) 1,238,000 1,228,000 10,000 10,000 10.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.iMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 29.S60,000 1.680.000 3,960.000 4.200.0001 2,400,000 1 3,420,000 1 2.100,000 16.080,000 TOW,000 27,660,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIA8IL17Y 1.Tedtle Pipe Clabn,3-36" 2.112.000 2,012.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 2. 1-5 Freeway Wlklning,3-37"" 43,000 13.000 20.000 10,000 30,000 30,000 3.Relic Portion of Los Alamios Stbtnmk 3-8-1 6S.000 50.000 15.000 15.000 15,000 4.Punp Station Inprovemords,2-37—(14%) 558,200 5,200 64,000 84,000 198,000 109,000 553,000 553,000 S.Miscellaneous Projeds 1.000.000 100.0001 loo.wal 100.0001 100,000 1 100,000 600.000 5W.000 1.000.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.WROVEMENTSIRELL181LITY 3.770.2001 2.080,2001 319,000 1 194.0001 298.0001 289.000 100,000 I 1,198,000 1 50D,000 1 1,698,000 REHABILITATION PROJECTS 1.Nkltols Streal TnNc Ptrdt.Rehab•(57.8%) (4) 500 000 600,000 500.000 2.Magnolia Tnrtt Sewer Rehab.3-35R (2) 3.708.000 908.000 750,000 1,500,000 550.000 2,800,000 2.800.000 3.Said Beach Blvd.Rehab..3-11R 98.000 38.000 20.000 40,000 60,000 60,000 SUB-TOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 4.306,000 946.000 1 770.0001 1.540.000 1 550,000 1 2,580.000 1 600,000 1 3.360.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 37,644.200 1,908.200 1 5.049.000 5.934.000 1 3,246,000 1 3,709,000 2,200,000 1 20,138,000 1 12,600,00111 1 32,738.000 • p&dI*ttnded by DWrid No.11 1.MASTER44 ANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION «ClslmlAppesI Pending 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN «•Partially knded by Other Districts 3 MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION StbIod to reknbtrsemant by CALTRANS 4.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN 9 CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 5 Schedule of District Collection System Projects_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F O H I J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997.98 1998.99 1999.20DO 2DDO-01 20DI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2W7 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE ra_eITA IMPRO EMENTSIINCREASE G!eAt�T1f 1.W.Coast Hwy Craft Tnnk Rehab.5-37-3(20%)•(1) 819,000 599.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 PUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 819.000 599.000 2D.000 A 20.000 A 20.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSMELIAMTY 1.Newport Blvd.s PCH wldenlnp,541'(42%) 200.0D0 20.000 160.000 20.000 180.000 - 180.000 2.Relocation d Lido ROV Station.5.41-1"' 895.000 25.000 225.000 575.000 70,000 870.000 870.000 S.Prmip Station Mnpr mawds.2-37"(20%) 1.116.400 10.4W 168.00D 168.000 292.000 370.000 1.100.000 1.108.000 4.Miscellaneous Projects 350.000 125.0Do 1 25,0001 25.000 1 25,0001 25,000 226.000 1 125.000 1 a50.a00 SU&TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABIUTY 2.581,400 55.400 678.0001 788.000 I 487.Oo0 1 403.0001 25.0001 2.381.000 1 125.0001 2.508.000 REHABILITATION PROJECT 1.Big Canyon hunk Rehabftdon(2) 2,000.000 50,000 900.000 1.000.000 50.000 2.000.000 2.000,000 2.Balm Pwmkmb Rehab 500.000 - 500.000 500.000 SUB-TOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 2.500.11110 b0.000 9DO.00D 1.OD0.000 60.0W 2.0W.0W 600.00I 2.500.OW GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 3.680.400 654.400 698,000 898,000 1.387.000 1.402.000 75.000 4.401.000 e25.000 5,028.000 •Partially lorded by District No.8 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY L04DER CONSTRUCTION Pwdsly 5uded by OtiW Districts 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION "'Costs partially shared wtih Cky a1 NewpoA 00uh County Sanitation District No. 6 Schedule of Dhlhict Collection System PMet is CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A 8 C D E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-00 1990-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2MI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPRGIOEMENTSIINCREASE 1.W.Coad Hwy Graf Tnnk Rdurb.5J7.3(80%)'(1) 2.478.000 2.398.000 80.000 80.000 80.000 2.Fairview Reid. Baker 81.b Wilson St..612(2) 3.415.000 380.000 1.000,000 1,700,000 385.000 3.085.000 3,055 000 3.District 8 Trunk Pareld(3) 1.325.000 2S.000 300.000 1.000.o00 1.325.000 1.325.000 4.Dover Drive Tnw*Parallel(3) 1.500.000 100.000 1.000.000 400.000 1.5w o00 1.500.0w 5.College Ave.P.S.Parald F.M.(5%)•(2) 74.0W 1.5W 7.500 65.000 72.500 72.5W = SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAP. 8.820.000 2.777.S00 87,500 1,OBS,000 1,825.000 1,885,000 1.400.00D 8,042,500 e,042.500 CAfffk 1.Newport Blvd.8 PCH Wldenln0.5-41(56%) 277.000 28.000 221,0oD 29.000 249,000 249.000 2.Watson Ave/Calforrrle Strad Sewer.613(2) 1.080.000 35.000 110.00D 915.000 1.025.0001225.WD 1.025.000 3.Mdenkq of Hoy aau Cosh Mean 1W.000 100.000 4.Mlaodaneous Pea" 250.WD 25.00D 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.OW 125.000 2W000 3.Pump Station knprovernerrb.2.37-16%) 239.200 2.2W 38.000 36.W0 84.000 81.000 237.000 237.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSNUWBRM 1.928.2W 65.200 392,000 1.004.000 109.0W 108.000 25.000 1.838.0W 1.881.000GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 10.748.200 2.842.700 479,500 2.069,0001.034,0001.771.000 1.425.000 7.878AW 7.903.5 Partially tended by Olsbid No.5 Partidly hnded by Dbtrld No.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION «• Parody hnded by Other Districts 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 3.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 7 Schedule of District Collection System PTol" CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A 8 C 0 E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REO EST REG FIVE EST S YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997.98 1996-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAAPITALIMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACITY 1.OrmW Park Anne Tnnk Replacement,7-17(2) 821.000 37,000 50.000 800,000 134,000 784.000 7111.000 2.Tustin Air Base Fedrlles (3) 5,750,000 150.000 2.000.000 3,000,000 600.000 1001000 • 5,750.000 5.750,000 3.NoM Trunk Replacement(3) 2.650.000 50.000 1.400,000 1.000.000 2.450.000 200.000 2.850.000 4. Gister-Red till Interceptor(31 5.300,000 300.000 300.000 5.000,000 5,300,000 5.Red fir Intercepter Pardid(3) 1.400,000 1.400,000 1,400.000 8.Lemon Heiglde Sewer Replaeernenl. 7-22.1/2(3) 5.414.000 1,851,000 550.000 2.t10t1.000 2.650.000 1.000.000 3.550.000 7.Browning Tnnk Replacrneal(3) 850.000 850,000 850.000 8.Codeoe Ave PS Pn*M Faroe Maln.7-23.1(95%)'(21 1.405.000 27,000 143,000 1.235,000 1.378.000 1.378,000 9.Iff rovemerds b Main St.P.S.,7.7-1(26%)•(2) 967.000 217,000 550,000 100,000 750,000 750.000 to.Main St.Pure Station EVanalan.7-7-2(28%)•(3) 775.000 775,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 25.332,000 2.145.000 993.000 3.e3S.000 3.464,000 1 2,450.00111 3.100.000 13.982.000 8.450.000 1 22.412.000 Ma CAPITAL PAPROMEMENTSMELIA811111 1.Pump Station krorovemenb.2-37 (33%)-Tn 1.315.200 12.200 198.000 198.000 462,000 445.000 1.303A00 IM3,000 2.Pump Station Abandonment 7-14.3 (3) 425.000 75,000 200,000 150,000 425.000 425.000 3.Miscellaneous Projects 500.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 50,000 60,OOD 250.000 250,000 500,000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABLITY 2.240,200 12.200 1 248.000 323,000 712.000 645.000 50,000 1.078A00 1 250,000 2,228,000 ON PROJECTS 1.Sun6owar Mwhoft Rehab.7-21 (M%)"(3) 308.000 1.000 70,000 185,000 50.000 306,000 305,000 2.Misoelanaous Repair of local Sewers (4) 6.600,000 100.000 1.200.000 1.200.000 1.200,000 1.200A00 4,800,000 700.000 5.600.000 SUBTOTAL REHABRITATION PROJECTS 5.906.000 1.000 1 100,000 1 1,270.000 1.385.000 1.250.000 1.200.000 5,206A00 J00,000 6,905,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 33,476,200 2,158,200 1 1.341.000 5,528.000 6,581A00 4,345,000 4350A00 21.145J= 8.400Ao0 30.545.000 7TS; •Pertidy herded by Olt kld No.14 1.MASTER44AN ED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION PWv*funded by DNbld No.1 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN Partlary hnded by Dl*ld No.8 3.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DEMON OR CONSTRUCTION »»Pard*baled by Other Oyb b 4.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN i CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 11 Schedule of Dbtrlct Collection System Pro]tlt is_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A 8 C D E F 0 H I J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST REG EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 t998-99 19M2000 200"1 2W"2 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACITY 1.SlaterAve.Pump Station Rio..11-17-1(1)•(07.6%) 6.520.000 8.450,000 70,000 70,0w 70.000 2.Golds wv d St Bower Replacement.11-17.2 (1) 2.730.000 4JAW 135,000 500,000 2.000.000 50,000 2.885.000 2.885.000 3.Slater Ave.ROOT(2) 1,700,000 - - 1.700.000 1.700.000 4.Hal Interceptor(2) 3.150.000 150.000 3.000.000 3.150.000 3.160.000 5.SlateNSprhpdde Replacement(2) e00.000 9W.000 1100,000 G.Warner Ave Sewer Reller(2) 1,500,000 1.600.000 1.500,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 10,400,000 0.495,000 205.0001 500,0001 2.000,000 1 2W W0 3.000,000 5,905,000 4,000.Wo 0,005,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILm 1.HuntlVan Beady Purchase Aband.11-18(2) 325.0W 75.000 250,000 325,0W 325.000 2.Pump Stem bnprovenrerds.2-37(0%)—(2) 350.300 3.300 54,000 54,000 126.000 121.000 355.000 355.000 3.MlsceOansow ProJeds e00,000 150.000 50.000 60,0W 50.1100 50.000 350.000 250,0110 800,o00 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIA&UTY 1.263,300 3,300 270,000 354,000 176,000 17t.ow 50,000 1.030.000 250.000 1.260.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 17,683.300 8.498.300 454.000 054,000 2.170,000 371A00 3.050.000 6.935.000 4.250.000 11.185.000 • Partially funded by OlsMct No.3 Parila0y horded by Other Districts 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 14 Schedule of Diddct Collection System Pro1sMl;*; CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REQ EST REQ EST REQ FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1097-98 1998.99 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE OAPACITY 1.Improvement b main SI.P.S..7.7-1(72%)q1) 2.120.000 193.000 1.675.000 250.000 1.925.000 1,925,000 2.Malr Street Pump SteBon EapanWm.7.7-2 p2%)"12) 2.000.000 2.000.000 SUB TOTAL CAP.IMPRONEMENTSfINl2<tEASE CAP. 4,120.000 195.000 1.675,000 250.000 1,925.000 1.925.000 2.000,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSMELIABI TY 1.MIS0e5arlaora Pre)eria 250.000 25,000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 125.0W 125.000 250.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.INPROVEMENTSIRELIABI ITY 250.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 125,000 125.000 250.0110 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMEN18 4.370.000 195,000 1.700.000 1 273,000 1 25A00 1 25,000 1 25.000 2.050,000 125A00 2.175.000 2.00Q000 • Pa ddly tended by 01*1d No.7 '•Future carutniellon near 2020.partially hnded by D.7 1.MASTER44 ANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION d RESOLUTION NO. 97-33-11 INITIATING PROPOSAL TO CONSOLIDATE DISTRICTS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 APPLYING TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 56000, ET SEQ. WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts were originally formed and organized in 1947-48 as separate districts providing sewer services, generally following the drainage patterns of Orange County; and, WHEREAS, Orange County's sewer system is now well-established, and the current main focus of the nine districts is on joint projects and the attendant regulatory issues; and, WHEREAS, over the years, the continuation of the nine districts as separate entities has contributed to certain administrative and financial burdens; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Part 3 of Division 3 of Title 5 of the Government Code, known as the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 ("the Act"), certain local agencies may make request to the Local Agency Formation Commission for a change of organization or a reorganization; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 11 is a local agency authorized to make such a proposal; and, WHEREAS, "consolidation" is one type of change of organization or ` reorganization permitted by the Act, defined as the uniting or joining of two or more districts, formed pursuant to the same principal act, into a single new successor district; and, WHEREAS, notice of intent to adopt this resolution of application has not been given to each interested and each subject agency as is permitted, but not required by Government Code Section 56800(b); and, WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be consolidated is inhabited; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of streamlining administration and Board procedures, maintaining financial and other records, and reducing costs, it has been determined by the District that the proposed consolidation will effect substantial administrative benefits and financial savings, both individually and collectively. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: This proposal for a change of organization is made pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 2: The change of organization proposed herein is the consolidation of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 into a single County Sanitation District, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. Section 3: The boundaries of the affected nine districts are as depicted in Exhibit "A", attached. The boundaries of the proposed consolidated district are as depicted in Exhibit "B", attached. Section 4: Terms and conditions of the proposed consolidation regarding consolidation of assets and financial obligations are set forth on Exhibit "C", attached. Section 5: The number and method of selection of members of the governing Board shall be asprovided in California Government Code Section 4730.65. Section 6: The following person is to be furnished with copies of the report by the Executive Officer and to be given mailed notice of the hearing on the proposal: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Section 7: This proposal is to be considered a formal request that proceedings for consolidation be taken pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 8: A plan for providing services within the affected territory is attached as Exhibit "D". Section 9: The effective date of the consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 24, 1997. H:\wp.dta\admin\BS\R ES\R ES97\97-33-11.doc STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, PENNY KYLE, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97-33-11 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board on the 24th day of September, 1997, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Shirley Dettloff, Chair; Dave Sullivan NOES: William G. Steiner ABSENT: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, this 24th day of September, 1997. Penny Kyl a ary Board of Direct of County-Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California H Awp.dta\admin\BS\FORMSU7IF 13.033.11.doc EXHIBIT A— Map of Current Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, wNlrn[R swo 0q LA HABRA c7 qti 9 LAMBERT R0 IMPERIAL NWY l RHEA eASTANeNuar ro �l- YORBA L RTON UNDA SWD 13 M ALVERN YORBA CNA►%"NAVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� OJT { DMHOH7IW AVE A UENA ., LA PA K PALM U"wL"AV 5 ANAHEIM W VILLA O SAuro CYPRE S I TA AVE PARK LOS W STANTON $ LAM OS > s= RAN E 3 Y N CNA►MAN AVE 2 yW GARDEN g r GRO sTMI S-TE Q. I wwsrwPdm Ftkv$ 1rrN Sr B 7 1 Tus %C R OEN Sr 11 SANT W ANA WARNER AVE I 8 FQUNTA r E1u:AVE, ALLEY HUN IN N a9 ADA%S AVIG PACIFIC AWTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE P O5 �P~r ' NEW PORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SRVM-CLR.CDR . CSDOC 1/95 EXHIBIT B — Map of Proposed Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S wNlrneR Iwo 0,9'4�e� LA HABRAq41q UMIeRT AD 'T IMPERIAL NWY gp CQGw O/�O ,.� EA MSTA NUR/RD L ON YOReA LINDA 8W0 _ MALVERN YORBA `NAPMANAVE LACENTIA LINDA 9�`F t1� I OMNOHTNO AV8 LA UE A A K PALM uNCOLNAV I > 5 rC ANAHEIM W VILLA �Q BALLADI CYPRESS I TA Ave PARK LOS STANTON S LAMITOS I pa RANGE Y p CHAPMAN AVG S a GARDEN GO P! GRO �SlM1�$ wesrwwsieRlve ,TT1/:r i S ` B W TU$ ~ MC R DIN sr g S ANTA W c ANA wARNeR Ave 8 FpUNTA s` 1 EkLIS AV- ALLEY I 1 I HUN IN N �`P Fq s a "DAMS AIVAI �' •} .PACIFIC AMIITON AVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE P P4r ' NEW PORT BEACH N N • _ •OMAMIIY• SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Exhibit C LAFCO Application Terms & Conditions Consolidation of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1. The nine separate districts known jointly as the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ("CSDOC") shall be consolidated into one single county sanitation district pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code Sections 4730 et seq.) and shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County ("District"). [G.C. §56844(v)] (As used herein, "CSDOC" refers to the nine Districts, both jointly, singly and in any combination.) 2. As a result of consolidating, the nine existing districts shall be dissolved and be reorganized as one consolidated District with one consolidated Board of Directors under California Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. At the time of consolidation, the Board of Directors would include representatives from the following jurisdictions: [G.C. §56844(n)] • County (1) - County of Orange Unincorporated Area • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Santa Ana Buena Park La Habra Seal Beach Cypress La Palma Stanton Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Tustin Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District 3. Directors of District shall be compensated in accordance with applicable state law. Pagel 4. All system facilities shall be transferred from existing CSDOC to District as of the effective date of consolidation in an "as-is" condition, without any payment or repair obligation from CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(k)(v)] 5. All lands, buildings, real and personal property, assets and appurtenances held by CSDOC, as of the effective date of the consolidation, shall be transferred to District. Such assets are enumerated in the CSDOC Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ending June 30, 1997. [G.C. §56844(b)] 6. District shall be designated as the successor to CSDOC and retain all of the rights, duties and obligations of the former CSDOC with respect to enforcement, performance or payment of any outstanding bonds, contracts or obligations of the former CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(m)] 7. All previously authorized charges, fees assessments and/or taxes currently in effect by CSDOC shall be continued by District. [G.C. §56844(t)] 8. The establishment of Special Zones within District, pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 4850 et seq., shall be effected on July 1, 1998 and shall collectively include any or all portions of the entire CSDOC service area and individually include the specified areas as shown on the nine attached maps. The existing rate schedules within each of the Special Zones shall continue as presently in effect by each District within CSDOC until such time as amended by the District's Board of Directors. The annual sewer service charge can only be amended by a vote of two-thirds of all members of the governing body. [G.C. §56844(e)] 9. All agreements by and between any two or more existing CSDOC's, including but not limited to: joint sewer ownership or use, construction or maintenance of facilities, shall be terminated upon the effective date of the consolidation. The termination of the agreements is appropriate in recognition of the new District assuming full and exclusive ownership and authority over all rights, duties and obligations of all existing CSDOC's. 10. To the extent not inconsistent with the terms of the consolidation, and as necessary to carry out the original intent, all contracts between the Irvine Ranch Water District and one or more existing CSDOC's, including those relating to ownership of capacity rights in treatment, disposal and sewer facilities, shall be assigned to District and remain in full force and effect. All contracts between County Sanitation District No. 14 and one or more Page 2 i I CSDOC's shall also be assigned to the new District and remain in full force and effect. 11. CSDOC shall transfer any and all indebtedness and the obligation to levy taxes, charges, assessments, or fees in order to make payment of said indebtedness to District. [G.C. §56844(c)] 12. 'CSDOC shall file a statement with LAFCO that the reorganization shall not adversely affect or impair the status of any employee of CSDOC or District. As of the effective date of this reorganization, all employees of CSDOC shall become employees of District. Rates of pay, accrued vacation and sick leave, vacation and sick leave accrual rates, employee rights, insurance, retirement benefits, and all other benefits and programs shall be transferred over to District at then-current levels. Memoranda of Understanding in place-under CSDOC shall be transferred to the new District. [G.C. §56844(I)] 13. Permits issued to CSDOC by any federal, state or local regulatory authority, shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties as contained within the permits and to continue operations without interruption. Such permits shall include but not be limited to: CSDOC's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit, including a waiver for full secondary treatment pursuant to Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act, and all other air and land permits. [G.C. §56844(v)] 14. Permits issued by CSDOC shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties contained in said permits and in the laws authorizing the issuance of said permits. Such permits shall include but not be limited to Sewer Connection Permits and Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permits. [G.C. §56844(c)] 15. District shall assume all existing contracts and obligations presently in full force and effect with CSDOC and which have not otherwise been specifically referenced herein. [G.C. §56844(m)] 16. The effective date of this consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. [G.C. §56844(p)] Page 3 Map of Special Zone 1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S WMITTIER BLVD 14, LA HABRA LAMBERT RO IMPERIAL HWY 4 V�Co,�9O/w- v V YO B EA BASTA HUM L ON YORBA LINDA BLVD MA BAN YORBA 13 C NAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� OJ�1 OAA 4GETWO AVE G A �G UE A I �., LAPAF�Co K PALMA UNC LX AVE g ANAHEIM o VILLA O .ALL Ro CY RESS ! TA VE PARK LOS STANTON g o� LAMITOS z O I S RANGE qqF W O Ri C m J S Y m CNA►MAN AV8 2 y GARD N a STM I S _ SE WESTMINSTER VE :%..tT.I►F.'6C::;�':':;:X B s` W 7 TUS i AiC f ..... __... . .. 11 X. �L 14 J J 8 F UNTA o ELUSAVE ALLEY HUN INGORADAMS N A O O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA '° IRVINE Og ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, WNI TIER a VD LA HABRA LAMBERT RD IMPERIAL NWY VVV Di. /,YD BAa_ L ON wRex.... ewr MALVERN YORBA �� crurMA»AVE LA LIN DA 92�CENTIA ORA ETNO AVE I A ���Q� -CIDG UE A .. LA PALM UN PA K I ; g ANAHEIM BALL RD CY RE S a YILLA IO . Tx ve PARK LOS STANTON LAMITOSRCN. ........ i i ... 3 :i:iE:i:iE:ii"y?:'aiai3 k>ii W 2 N 3 CNA►MAN AV9 ::;;:3.:,::�..:�::o:: .....:;ta.;.:::::::.>.. D � GAS sTMI SE wBarwMsrER vE ITTN ST B 7 s M u i 0' us s MC DEN ST 11 « SANT '`F 14 g W m ANA WARNER AVE i 8 F UNTA a 1 E US AVE ALLEY HUN N N ADAMS AVE, G 9 yr O PACIFIC LTONAVE COST OCEAN MESA �°° PAP IRVINE 5 NE NPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' �rA orrua OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 3 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S : MRBrnER aWD:::: ;:::;::LA HABRA' n� '�•1,c 9ggn IAMSSWRC �5 �C 170 'IYPERtAL MWV B EA COG SASTA NURV -r'/- w. MORSA IINOA BIVD O L ON YORBA 13 MAwERN 9 CNAPMAN AVE E LINDA LACTIA EN � J� orw er►to AVE 2X. GO c0 PALM LA K 5 ANAHE[M o VILLA dD �O autraD..CY .R S f:..: TA AVE PARK LAMRO.3 O 3 s RAN E t m S +TrM sr E _....:::.:wEsrNsssit va:: g < ; 7 Y s u 1 Ie <> O T US MCP DDEN ST '9L SANT O = .........<:... ANA WARNER AVE O W J J SAVE ALLEY e� ,v ?O ,MRCP r HUN ING N `... s c AptMS AV! 4 '�4r O PACIFIC AWLTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA ?�,�° a IRVINE O5 g ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 5 LOS ANGELES COUNTY s A- WNITTIER SLVO LA HABRA d 17gq. 9AA•� LAMBERT RO 4 C�C"Y,9nO IMPERIAL HWY VV OGw.-7�AOC B EA oGti�- USTAN NURY L ON VOREA LINOA BLVo MIILVERN YORBA 13 C NAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'`�. pt GOJ� ORA ETNO AVE I L A LA /O�O �y �., PALMA LI PA K g ANAHEIM o VILLAdD �O sALL so CY RE S I TA VE PARK LOS STANTON 3 y LAMITOS O I RANG E 0 W Y C • 5 i e CNAPMAN AV S m o GARD N GRO STMI S S WESTMINSTER WE I.ST 7 W u TUS � m MO F Imm Sr �Y 11 0 SANT �' 14 W m ANA WARNER AVE J 8 F allNTA6 r E US AVE ALLEY HUN'-INGIF IN ADAMS AVq GJ O,q gr O PACIFIC COST OCEAN MESA �° '' IRVINE eP WEWPORT: EACH.... N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 6 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, wNIrnER Blvo LA HABRA �9'�1• LAMBERTRQ C` •r�9 IMPERIAL HWY B EA NE// BASTANURY RO L ON roneA uNa Blvo MALVERN YORBA 13 CNA►MAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA GOJ� ORA ETMO AVE I Z 'Q�O A �., LA K PALM �N PA 5 ANAHEIM o VILLA rD �O BALL Ro CYPRESS I T vs PARK LOS ; STANTON 3 LAMITOS O RAN E e 3 p� e Q m m F W O R > x m CNA►MAN AV 2 a oJJ GARD N GRO STM I S S WESTMNSTER VE ITT11 ST 9 IC 7 W u < O m e TUS MC F N ST �'qj•'�Y 11 SANT W a ANA WARNER AVE 8 FIDUNTA r 1 E US AVE ALLEY c�Nf��O oF ' HUN IN N ROAMS A 6 O yr PACIFIC AIiLTONAVE COST OCEAN IRVINE Q P 5 ,rP NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 7 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 3, wNIrnER BLvo 6 LA HABRA LAMBERT IMPERIAL HWV OG'Y 'YO B EA BASTA NUR'/ "Y L ON r°RBA uNOA BLvo MALVERN YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'G� � 9s VOJZ OM ETNO AVE I 2 'O�•O 45 UE A LA P� �Co PALMfi UN LN AVE K CY og ANAHEIM o VILLAdD BA u Ro RE SS LOS STANTON Q 3 TA vE PARK LAMITOS O g RAN E i Y m CNAPMAN AVE < W �L 'n GAR N o � G � GRO STMI S €< SE wES7MNSTER VE 17M wr MC F EN ST �'9J. o SANT 11 W g ANA WARNER AVE V 1 EA LEY A L E S 6Y6 ! C. ADAMS Ave i O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE CO OCEAN MESA �a° IRVINE O5 , NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 11 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S,1 WHIrnER BLVO 09 �B� LA HABRA LAMBERT RO IMPERIAL NW V .r�`•C v�I TO/.r0 B EA BASTA NURV VORBA UNDO,BLVO MALVERN 13 9 L ON YORBA ` CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 'F � 9s, 0 OJ2 OM ETNO AVE I 2 5 UE A�C9 PALM UN WA K oy ANAHEIM o VILLA O BALL RO CY RE AV S 1 TA VE PARK LOS STANTON 01 LAMITOS a RAN E > O a g > Y ro CNAPMAN AV = m GAR D N ° GRO STMI S S 7 WE VE 1T7N sr 8 � _ : o ;<> ><> . . TUS ::::.....:::: ',>.� ? MCP DDEN ST ANA O ;•_.1 ..,.zz..::Y: WARNER AVE F UNTA o t E &AVE ALLEY �F :.N. N AOAMS AVI / O PACIFIC COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE eQ, W JP ' NEW PORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1195 Map of Special Zone 13 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S,AA-- WNIrnER BLVD O q.Ye LA HABRA 9y�Q `�9ggn LAMBERT AO 9 IMPERIAL NWV -.OV �AOC 0 Q B EA OG�� RASTA NURV VORSA LINDA BLVD L ON LVERN YORBA MA 9 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA I ORAI fiT110 AVE J 2 0 O G i 5 UE A ., LA O� PA K o ,1 PALMA u LNAV 3 O� ANAHEIM ; VILLA dD �, eAURo CY RE S I TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON > °u a LAMITOS z O RANGE o 3 > Y m CNAPMAN AVB I S m q GARD N � GRO STMI S SE wEsrAgNSTER I\VE 17TN ST 9 U 7 W ` O' TUS O MC F DOEN ST g SANT 1 1 W m ANA WARNER AVE J 8 F UNTA o 1 El US AVE ALLEY HUN,TINGTON a�pP `P9 G' r s a ADAMS A O g O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA m'� IRVINE ONEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 0 wNITTIER BLVD Q �� LA HABRA LAMBERT RD ClC �•' IMPERIAL HWY CQG�Q�tiQC B EA SASTAN NURY YORBA LINDA SLVD L ON MALVERN YORBA 13 CNAPMIIN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9 GOJ.�1� OM ETNO AVE j A L LA I PALMA LINDpPA K I > Og 1 ANAHEIM W VILLA Q ALL AD CY RE S TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON $ LAMITOS C z O s RAN E a m W 3 J > Y CNAPMAN AVS 2 y m v� GARD N o o g GRO STM I S S wESTMINSTER VE 17TH ST 7 U W u i 1 O T US . .......... ....... ...................... ...................... � MC F DDeN Sr 11 � SANT 0 m ANA w WARNER AVE J i r 8 F UNTA r` 0 I e�ALLEY EILIS AVE J».r.>;.�"ii%�iiii :::;Yis� 5>i:?;j::c>i0ic'ia '` .'iiiiiiiiiiii;i2 ;: �i%�;:•.�'"�''.>ii:�?iii�'�. :;ii ?i iiii ?iii3 EAQ 2ADAMS AVIII o PACIFIC AMILTON AVE .: .... COSTA o tRVINE MESA a ��e P 1 J 2 1 OP r ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Exhibit D Plan of Services for the Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County L INTRODUCTION This Plan of Services has been prepared pursuant to Government Code Section 56653, which requires that a plan for providing services within the affected territory be provided whenever an application for a change of organization is submitted to LAFCO. This document will facilitate the consolidation of the nine (9) existing County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) into one single County Sanitation District pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq. The resulting consolidated agency shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County (District). This consolidation proposes a transfer of all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of CSDOC to the District. The Plan of Services provides a description of CSDOC and its operations and how they will be consolidated as the District. 11. DESCRIPTION OF CSDOC A. General Information The CSDOC is made up of nine independent special districts. Each district is a political subdivision of the State of California and is governed by a representative of each city and sanitary district within the district and, if the District includes unincorporated territory, a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Each district has its own budget. All districts except District Nos. 13 and 14 have their own tax rate and trunk sewer systems. District No. 13 buys capacity in the other districts' transmission facilities. A Joint Administrative Organization was formed in 1948 to administer the business of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities and the activities common to all districts. This is provided for in a Joint Ownership Operation and Construction Agreement. The day-to-day operation of the organization is under the direction of a General Manager, one assistant general manager, eight department heads, for an authorized staff of 560 full time equivalents for the Fiscal Year 1997-98. B. Types of Services, Level, and Range of Service Currently Provided The CSDOC is a single-purpose public entity formed solely for the collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater and its residuals and serves the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal needs of approximately 2.2 million people. During 1996-1997, an average daily sewage influent flow of 244 million gallons per day (MGD)was treated and 510 wet tons per day of residual solids (biosolids) was produced. CSDOC encompasses a 470 square-mile area of Orange County that includes 23 of the County's 31 cities. CSDOC operates the third largest wastewater management agency of its kind west of the Mississippi, with assets valued at more than $1 billion dollars. The nine individual districts own about 650 miles of major trunk sewers, 22 pumping stations and two major treatment plants with disposal facilities to safely discharge the treated effluent through an ocean outfall into deep ocean waters. The treatment plants process an average of 244 million gallons of wastewater per day. Page 1 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley. It has a current operational primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 108 MGD and a secondary treatment capacity of 66 MGD currently being expanded to 80 MGD. Treatment Plant No. 2 is in Huntington Beach. It has a primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 186 MGD. Plant No. 2 provides advanced primary treatment to all of the wastewater that enters the plant and secondary treatment to up to 90 MGD of the total flow. Table 1 highlights the service area characteristics and system features. Table 1 Service Area Joint Works Facilities -As of June 30, 1997 Total Population Served (estimated) 2,275,000 Service Area (estimated) 470 square miles Total Number of Cities Served 23 Total Miles of Trunk Sewers 650 Number of Pumping Stations 22 Number of Treatment Plants 2 Primary Treatment Capacity (includes standby) Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 Total Primary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 MGD Secondary Treatment Capacity Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 Total Secondary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . 156 MGD Total Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450 MGD Reported Average Daily Flow Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 MGD Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 MGD Total Average Daily Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 MGD Page 2 J CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service C. Description of Sanitary Sewer System CSDOC processes wastewater from the collection systems of the various cities, water districts and local sewer agencies. They do not deal directly with individual customers except for portions of District No. 7, which is located primarily in unincorporated territory of the County near Tustin. CSDOC's assets consist of individual district assets and each district's respective share of jointly owned assets. Table 2 summarizes the respective District ownership in jointly owned and separately owned property, plant, equipment and construction in progress, at cost, as of June 30, 1997: Table 2 District Ownership Jointly Owned Separately Owned Total Total property, plant and equipment $804,200,000 $321,300,000 $1,135,500,000 Less accumulated $310,200,000 depreciation Net property, plant and equipment $825,300,000 D. Additional Assets In addition to its real property and facilities, CSDOC owns service vehicles, equipment, tools, repair parts inventory, and communications and office equipment. CSDOC maintains cash, liquid securities to meet its cash flow requirements, and other reserves. The following table summarizes the districts' reserves budgeted for the end of Fiscal Year 1996-97. Table 3 Reserves Analysis "Dry Period" Operating Cash Flow $28,021,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,221,000 Debt Service Reserves Fund Balance 59,724,000 Capital Reserves 49,233,000 Environmental Requirements Reserves 4,484,000 Flood/Earthquake Insurance Reserves 81,450,000 Rate Stabilization Funds 141,200,000 Total $375,333,000 Page 3 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service E. Liabilities As of June 30, 1997, CSDOC liabilities included debt in the amount of approximately $397,575,000. These issues include $397,45,000 of Certificates of Participation (COP) and $30,000 of general obligation (G.O.) bonds. The Districts have maintained their AA- rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and Aa rating from Moody's Investor Services, although all COP issues are backed by issuance of letters of credit and are rated AAA. The Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget provides for$32,620,000 to service the debt on the various COPs issued. In addition, there is a $15,000 annual payment to maturity in January 1999 for the G.O. bonds in District No. 1 1. Consolidation of the districts will have no impact on the liabilities of CSDOC. Under consolidation into a single County Sanitation District, the new County Sanitation District assessments all predecessor district obligations. Further, the districts are presently joined by agreement to manage and fund liabilities. The new consolidated District will establish special zones upon consolidation to continue differential user fees and to ensure that predecessor districts' outstanding debt is serviced by only those residents who originally assumed that debt. The boundaries of each zone will be the same as those of each predecessor district. The new consolidated District will establish nine (9) zones to differentiate and account for costs, revenues and liabilities of the existing districts. In addition, an Improvement District (ID) could be formed coincident with each predecessor district's service area to enable proper segregated accounting for the retirement of the existing Certificates of Participation (COPs) debt. As new future borrowing may occur, new ID's would be formed to include the service area benefiting from the projects. Such new ID's would not necessarily have boundaries congruent with the zones. For projects at the treatment plants, however, an ID to include all of the new District's service area could be formed to properly allocate the cost of such improvements that would benefit all the zones. It is also expected that the consolidated District would continue the practice of dedicating Ad Valorem Taxes where it would be collectable within a zone to the retirement of long-term debt of an appropriate ID. F. Management and Employees CSDOC presently operates in a consolidated fashion pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code Section 4840 et seq. CSDOC currently employs approximately 560 full-time employees. Legal Services are provided by the law firm of Woodruff, Spradlin and Smart auditing services are also provided by contract. In addition, various other services are contracted-out. These include such varied services as groundskeeping, environmental review, ocean research and reporting, etc. CSDOC's organization chart is included in CSDOC's Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget which is submitted along with this application. The existing net joint operation budget for Fiscal Year 1997-98 is $46,922,650. Consolidation of the districts into a single District would result in the continuation of management and operational structures and functional expenditures similar to those described above. Operations of the new District would remain the same as the current operations of CSDOC. Consequently, there would be no change in employee compensation and employee benefits as adjustments would not be required. The transition from the existing joint operation to a single District operation would have no impact on employees, their occupational status, or their benefits. Page 4 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service G. Rates and Charges Each district, except District No. 14, has an adopted Sanitary Sewer Service Fee to provide funding for operating the sewer systems in accordance with the Clean Water Act and CSDOC's Revenue Program. District No. 14 is funded through the payment of an annual charge by the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) directly to CSDOC. IRWD levies and collects individual user charges from each parcel receiving service. Sanitary Sewer Service Fees are set annually by each district after a review of projected needs. In May, 1997,The Board of Directors adopted a user rate increase fee schedule that provides for gradual rate increase over the next five years for six of the nine districts. This represents that first user rate increase in seven years. The Districts have been able to avoid user fee increases by reducing operational costs through reorganizing and streamlining Districts operations, holding vacant positions open, and deferring new facilities. However, because the Districts' capital improvement program's debt service obligations continued to increase beyond the level of its primary funding source, i.e. property tax revenues, and because of the additional capital improvement requirements, increase in user fees became inevitable. The following is the adopted Annual Sewer Service Fee Rate Schedule District 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 1 $91.36 $100.27 $110.04 $120.77 $132.55 2 $73.00 $75.00 $77.00 $80.00 $82.00 3 $75.00 $76.00 $77.00 $78.00 $80.00 5 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96., 6 $78.00 $80.00 $82.00 $84.00 $86.00 7 $55.00 $60.00 $66.00 $73.00 $80.00 11 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 $101.25 $113.91 13 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 As was indicated previously, establishment of special zones upon consolidation would continue the existing schedules of differential Sanitary Sewer Service Fees until such time as amended by action of the governing body. Said fees shall not be amended without a two- thirds vote of all members of the governing body. Consolidation is expected to facilitate reorganizing and streamlining the new District's operations. H. Summary of Revenues and Expenses The CSDOC Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget, which is included in this application package, contains detailed information regarding revenues and expenses. Attention is called to Section 3, pages 1-13, of the Budget document for summary information. JII DESCRIPTION OF THE CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT A. General Page 5 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service The nine independent County Sanitation Districts currently collectively known as CSDOC'; and which utilize joint operating,working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, will be consolidated into a single County Sanitation District pursuant to the California County Sanitation District Act(Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq.). The boundaries of the consolidated District will be the same as the outer boundaries of those nine predecessor districts. B. Types of Services, Level and Range of Services The new District will assume all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of the former CSDOC. The District will own and operate the wastewater treatment system which provides sewage collection, treatment and disposal services currently owned and operated by the nine (9) Sanitation Districts known jointly as CSDOC. C. District Structure The District' s organization will be the same as that structure which presently exists under the CSDOC joint operating agreement for the operation and administration of the joint facilities. D. Governing Board Composition The new District will be formed under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65. Under Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65, the governing body of the consolidated District would be made up of a 25-member board representing local cities, sanitary districts and the County of Orange unincorporated area. Board membership would decrease from 29 to 25 with the loss of double representation for the Cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Yorba Linda and the County of Orange. The proposed goveming Board formed under Section 4730.65 would include the following agencies: • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Tustin Buena Park La Habra Santa Ana Cypress La Palma Seal Beach Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Stanton Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District I • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District • County (1) -County of Orange (to represent the Unincorporated Areas) Page 6 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service E. Three Year Budget of the Consolidated District It is anticipated that revenues and expenditures which would have been budgeted by CSDOC for the operation and administration of joint facilities and the construction of capital improvements will be the basis for the new District's financial plan. Attachment A is a 3-year projection of the District's budget under consolidation. The projection covers Fiscal Years 1998-99, 1999-2000 and 2000-2001. Attachment B is a summary of anticipated capital improvements for the new District. This summary of capital needs was derived from CSDOC's Joint Works Capital Improvements Budget. jV IMPACTS ON CUSTOMERS There will be no negative financial impact on customers. No rate changes are anticipated as a result of the consolidation. Please refer to previous discussion regarding the formation of special zones. V. IMPACTS ON OTHER JURISDICTIONS There will be no service level impacts on any of the cities, sanitary districts, and other agencies presently relying on services provided by CSDOC as the services responsibilities, without modification, will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Effective date is proposed as July 1, 1998. i. IMPACTS ON REGIONAL PARTICIPATION All CSDOC's contractual obligations will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Accordingly, there are no anticipated impacts. Page 7 915/97 Consolidated Sanitation Distrct of orange Counly Proiected Budgets Fiscal Years 1998-99 Thru 2000-01 991 8-1999 991 9-2000 002 0-2001 Revenues Industrial/Commercial Use Fees $ 9,317,000 $ 10,714,000 $ 12,322,000 Sewer Service Fees 65,938,000 68,907,000 72,436,000 Fees From Other Agencies 6,150,000 4,700,000 5,250,000 Connection Fees 6,784,000 6,065,000 9,727,000 Interest 22,443,000 22,420,000 21,749,000 Miscellaneous&Other 2,640,500 4,141,500 4,141,500 Property Taxes 30,572,000 30,565,000 30,562,000 New COP Issues 53,200,000 57,000,000 62,400,000 Total Revenues $ 197,044,500 $ 206,512,500 $ 218,587,500 Requirements Collection System O&M Expenses $ 9,553,000 $ 10,604,000 $ 10,527,000 Treatment System O&M Expenses 47,861,000 46,818,000 49,794,000 Collection System Improvements 20,997,000 24,902,000 26,497,000 Treatment System Improvements 70,066,000 78,429,500 96,360,500 GO Bond Principal&Interest 16,000 16,000 - Costs of New COP Issuance 2,660,000 2,850,000 3,120,000 COP Service&Retirement 37,772,000 42,590,000 47,834,000 Total Expenses $ 188,945,000 $ 208,409,500 $ 234,152,500 Revenue Exceeding Expenses $ 8,099,500 $ (1,897,000) $ (15,565,000) Beginning Cash Balances 385,031,450 393,130,950 391,233,950 Ending Cash Balances $ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,668,950 AApprooriations, Dedications & Reserves "Dry Period"Operating Cash Flow $ 28,800,000 $ 30,121,000 $ 30,737,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,483,000 11,925,000 12,064,000 Capital Projects Completion 49,995,000 49,946,200 49,540,100 Environmental Requirements Reserve 4,634,000 4,484,000 4,484,000 Required Debt&COP Service Reserves 38,359,0W 41,133,000 44,230,00D "Dry Period"COP Service Cash Flow 27,705,350 31,244,600 35,022,350 Property&Liability Catastrophe Reserve 69,752,850 90,971,850 91,208,250 Rate Stabilization Funds 142,401,750 131,408,300 108,383,250 •$ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,668,950 Unappropriated Cash & Investment Balances $ - $ $ - County Sanitation District No. 1 acheddle of DbMet Consetlon ayd m Pool CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST RED EST REG EST REG EST RED FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1907-95 190699 1OW2000 2000-01 2MI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILRY 1.Mlacellnems Pro)ede 250,0W 25.000 25.OW 25,0m 25.000 25,0W 125.000 125,000 250.000 SUB TOTK CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABIUTY I 250.000 25.0001 25.000 25,000 25.000 25.0w 125,000 125.0m 250.000 REWI ITATION PROJECTS 1.Santa Me Inn*Sewer Rehab.(1) 6,3W.OW 75.000 75,0W 0.225,000 e.3W.000 2.SunOower M-dwis Rehab.(1)7-21-(30%) 140,000 30.OW e0.000 30.000 140,000 140.000 3.Dyer Road Manhole Rehab.(1) 350.0W 50.000 2W.000 100.000 350,000 350.000 4.Udn.Oyer Manhole Rehab.(1) 350.OW 50.000 1W.000 150.000 200.000 350.000 5.Omenv"Sultwen Manhole Rehab.(1) 2W.OW 50,000 100.0m 150,0m 50,000 200.000 e.Rdd St.MemAd Rehab.(1) 230.000 230.000 230.000 SUBTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 7.510,0W 75.000 30.000 130,000 330.000 3W.OW 065.000 e.70S.000 7.570.m GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS L 1.520,000 100.000 55.000 g 155,W0 355,000 us.= 090,000 e.1130.000 7.1120.000 ParOafy hinded by Dkb1d No.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 2 Schedtde of District Collection System Projeai CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARI TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 1998.99 1999.2000 2WO-01 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOT COMPLETE CAPITAL P/P_ROVEMEWSANCREASE CAPACITY 1.Replace Euclid Relief Think Sewer,PA to Edinger(1) 6.750.000 8,750,000 6,750,000 2.Replacement of Newhope Placentia Trunk.2-3R(2) 6,500.000 250,000 3,000.000 3,250,000 3,250.OW 8,500.000 3.Replacement of Cypress Ave.Subtr nk, 24R(2) 5.750.000 250,000 2.000,000 3,000,000 500,000 5.750.000 - 5,750,000 4,Taft Inleroeplor Sewer,241-3(1) 1,800,0m 1,800,000 1,800,000 5.Batavia-Lincoln Trunk Read(1) 325,000 325,000 325,000 8.Boise Sewer Relld(1) 460.000 460.000 460,000 7,Santa Ana River Intr(SA.R.I.)Relld.2.31'(1) 13,414,000 64,000 350,000 2.000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 12.350,000 1.000,000 13,350.000 S.Carbon Canyon Dam Tnnk Sewer&P.B.Abwdn.(2) 1,775,000 175.000 1,500.000 100.000 1,775,000 1,775,000 SMTOTAL CAP.IMpROVEM0MW4CREAWCAP. 36,771,000 64,000 175.000 2,100,000 4.100.000 8.250.000 6,500,000 23.125,000 13.565.000 38,710.0110771 1.Abandorrnad of Yorbs Lida Pimp Station (2) 200,000 50,000 50,000 150,000 200,000 2.Santa Ana RIM kdr Manhole 11 Axess.2-14-SR2'(1) 5.052.000 452.000 200.000 200.000 2.000.000 2.000,000 200,000 4,600,000 4,600,000 3.91 Freeway Mfenkq Projects,2-7A" 105.000 92.000 13.000 13.000 13.000 4.1-5 Freeway Widening Profed.2-35 •' 109,000 15.000 50.000 44,000 94.000 94,000 5.1-5 Freeway Widening Project,2-3A " 24,000 4,000 20.000 20.000 20,000 8.Santa Ana River tntr Shut OR Gale Replacement 325.000 75.000 250,0W 325,000 325,000 7.Pump Station improvements.2-37•(10%) 398,700 3,700 60,000 60.000 140,000 135.000 395,000 395,OW - 8.Miscellaneous Projects 600,000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100,000 500,000 100,000 600.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMEN MELIABILRY 6.813.700 568,T00 518,000 651,000 I 2,240.000 2,235,000 350,000 5,997,000 250.000 6.247.000 RMMUTATION PROJECTS 1.Euclid Trunk Manhole Rehab.2-UR 9S2,1100 122.000 70,000 730,000 30,b00 830,000 830.000 2.South Santa Ana River Trunk Easement.2-39 18.000 16,000 S118-TOTAL RewitL1TATION PROJECTS 968.000 138.000 70.000 730.000 30,000 830.000 630.0m GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 44,555,700 786,700 763,000 3.484,000 6.370,000 10,465,000 11.850.0011 29,952A00 /3.635.000 43,787,000 P. • perilMly tended by 08ror Districts ..Costs to be reknbursed by Calbans 1.MASTER44ANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION 2.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN 3 CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 3 Schedule of Dlehlct Collection System Projet:4. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 200001 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTaANCREASE CAPACITY 1.Artesia Brandt Shbtr nk Robot(3) 400,000 50.000 300,0110 $0.000 400.000 ,00.000 2.Wastside Robot Interceptor Parallel(3) 5.700.000 5.700,000 5,700,000 3,Wdslskte Rebel Tnnk(3) 700.000 700,000 700,000 1.Oranpe•Wastem Subtrunk Rdd Sewer,3-25(2) 1.207.000 57.000 10Q000 1.000,000 50.000 1.150,000 1.150.000 5.Knott INT Relief,Orenpethorpe to Artesia(3) 3.300.000 100.000 1,500.000 1.500,000 3.100.000 200,000 3,300,DW 6.Hoover-Western Subtnv*Relief on Trask(3) 1.050.000 50,000 500,0W 500,000 1.050.000 1,050,000 7.Millerftokler,Artesia to Hillsborough.3-38-1(2) 5.335,000 65.000 150.000 3,OW.000 2.000,000 120,000 5,270,DW 5.270.000 8.Miter-Hoklor pnprov., imperial Hwy.,3-38-312) 3.330.DW 230,000 2.000.000 1,000.000 100,000 3,1011.000 3.100,000 9.Los Alamitos Shbtna*Relef(3) 5,000.000 5,000.000 S,000= 10.Magwke Relief Swr,Watmin.-Tta*3.35R-1111 2.300.000 300.000 1,600.000 2W.000 .2.000.000 2.000.000 11.Sister Ave.Pump Station Repl..11-17.1(1)'(12.4%) 1,238,000 1.228.000 10.000 10.000 110,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP,IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 29.560.000 1.680,000 3,950,000 1,21)(114 2,100,000 3.420,000 2,100,000 16,080,1>DO 11,600,000 27,880,000 CRITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 1.TedhNe Pipe Claim,3.38" 2,112,00D 2,012.0W 100,000 10DAW 100,000 2. 1-5 Freeway Wdeninp,3-37"" 43.000 13,0D0 20.000 10.000 30,000 30,000 3.Rebc Portion d Los Alarnh7os SO*uf h,34-1 65.000 50.000 15.000 15.000 15.000 1.Pump Station Improvements,2.37-(14%) 558.2W 5.200 61,000 61,000 196,000 1119.000 553.000 553.000 S.Miscellaneous Projects 1 1.000.000 100.0001 IW.000 1 100.000 Iw'w0j 10D,000 5W.D00 I f100,000 I 1.000.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY .710.2001 2.080.2001 319.0001 194,0001 296.000 289,000 1 100,000 1 1,198.0001 500,000 1 1.698.000 REHABILITATION PROJECTS 1,Hidhob Strom Tnnk Poch Rehab'(57.8%) (4) 500 000 - 5W.000 500,000 2.Magnolia Tnnk Sewer Rehab,3.35R (2) 3.708.000 908,000 750.000 1,500.000 550.000 2.$W.DW 2,eW.000 3.Seal Beach Blvd.Rehab.,3-11R 98.000 38,000 20.000 10,000 60,D00 60,000 SUBTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS F37.6441.20(1 0 00 77 8.000 916.00.000 1,5/0.000 550,000 2.ew ow 500,000 3.36 00 0,0 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS RA 1,906,200 1 5.049.000 5.934,000 3,246,000 3,709,000 2,200,00D I 20.138.0W 12,600,000 32,73$.000 • Partiary Ihrh- by District No.11 1.MASTER-PI ANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION «CtaWAppeal Pandfinip 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN •»Partially Sxhded by Other Disvide 3 MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION ""Stbjed to reYnbursentenl by CALTRANS 1.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN IL CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 5 Schedule of Dlstdct Collection System Projeets- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A S C D E F 0 N 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REO EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1097-98 1998-99 1999.2000 2000-01 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACITY 1.W.Coes1 Hwy Gravity Trunk Rehab.5.37-3(20%)•(1) 819.000 Wow 20.000 20.000 20.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAP. 819.000 599.000 20.000 20.0110 20.000 UB CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 1.Newpod Blvd.8 PCH Wdenlnp.541•(42%) 200.000 20.000 160.000 20.000 190.000 180.000 2.Rebcallao of Lido Puny Station.5-41-1"' 895,000 25.000 225,000 575.000 70.000 sm.000 870.000 3.Purnp S1e0on kMmverrreras.2-W-TM) 1.116.400 10.400 168.000 1811.000 392.000 278,000 1.108.000 1.1108.000 4.Mbcellaneous Projects 350,000 125.0001 25.000 25.OW 25.000 25.000 22s.o0o 125.000 350.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMEWSIRE IABLITY 2.501.400 $5.400 678.000 788.000 487.000 403.000 1 25.0001 2,381.0001 125.000 2.500.000 REHABILITATION PROJECT 1.Blp Canyon Tank RehabMtedon(2) 2.000.000 50,000 900.000 1.000.000 50.000 2.000.000 2.000.000 2.Beboa Panhs da Rehab 5W.000 - 6110.000 500.000 SUBTOTAL RENABMJTATION PROJECTS 2.500.000 50.000 900.000 1.000.000 60.000 2.000.000 500.000 2.500.0W GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 5.680.400 6M.400 898,000 838.000 1.367.000 1.403.000 75.000 4.401.000 825.000 5.026.000 •Partially Amded by District No.8 1.MASTER41 ANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION »padlaly(fed by Other ObO is 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION •»Crib partially shared wtih CMy of Newport Bead) 1. \I - v County Sanitation District No. 6 Schedule of DIStrIct Collection System Protects CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1907-98 Iewe9 1999.2000 2000-01 2001.02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2WT YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CaTAL IMPIMVEMENTS.". y 1.W.Cowl Hwy Gravity Tnnk Rehab.5-37.3(80%) (1) 2.478.000 2.39e.0W 90.000 W.000 00,000 2.Farvbw ReW. Baker St.10 VWS0n St..e-12(21 3.N5.000 380,000 1,000,000 1,700,000 36S,OD0 3.065,000 3,Oe5,000 3.DIsMd 6 TM*Parallel(3) 1,325,000 25.000 300.000 1.000.000 1.325.000 1.325.000 4.Dover DrIn Trwrk PWMW(3) 1.500.000 100.000 1.000.000 400.000 1.500,000 1.500.000 5.Colepe Ave.P.S.Pastel F.M.(5%)"(2) 74.000 1.500 7,5W 65,000 72.5W 72,500 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAP. 8.820.000 2.777.500 eT,600 1.0e5,o00 1,e25,000 1,665,000 1,ap,00D e5012,500 e,012.500 CAPITA 1.N9%gW Blvd.&PCH VAdeninp,5-41(58%) 277,OW 28.000 221,0W 28.000 249,000 249,000 2.VVeisen Ave I Ca fwft Sh"Sewer.6­13(2) 1.060.000 35,000 110,000 915.000 1,025,000 1,025,000 3.Wwer"ed"M tivu Coate Mesa 160.000 11110.0110 too aoo 4.Mlseelanwo Pro(eds 250,000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25,000 25.000 125.OW 126.000 M000 5.PurV Ogden Mtprvvemanls.2-37—(6%) 1 239.2W 2.2W 36.0001 36.000 1 6/.000 1 01.000 237,000 1 237,0110 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSSIRELIABILITY 1.926.200 65.200 392.0001 1,0W,000 I 109.000 1 106.0001 25,000 I W6.0w 225,000 1,e81,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS f0,718,200 2,642.700 479,5W 2,089,000 1,931,000 1,771.000 1,125,000 7,676,500 225.010 7.903:500 • Putidy lorded by Dowd No.5 Partially Podded by District No.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY USER CONSTRUCTION «• Partially Ponded by Other 01*Ws 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY TINDER DESIGN 3.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 7 Schedule of WrIct Collecdon System Prof" CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REQ EST REQ EST RED FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 1988-99 1OW2000 200"1 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENiSANCREASE CAPACITY 1.OrmVe Perk Acres Trunk Replacement.7.17(2) 821,0m 37.000 50.000 800.000 134.000 WOW 784,000 2.Tus0n Air Bass Facilities (3) 5.750.000 150.000 2.000.000 3.000.000 500.000 100.000 • 5,750,D00 5.750.000 3.PimM Tn n*Re&cwrwM(3) 2,850.000 50.000 1.400,000 1.000.000 2.450.000 200.000 2,650.000 4. Gisler-Red Hill Intercepts(3) 5.300.000 300,000 300.000 5.000.000 5.300.000 5.Red HIS Interceptor Paralfe{(3) 1.400.000 1,400.000 1.400.000 S.Lemon Hetplts Server Replacement, 1-22-1/2(3) 5.414.000 1.064.000 550,000 2.000.000 2.550.000 1.000,000 3.550,000 7.Browning;Tnnk ReplawneM(3) $50.000 850.000 B50.000 S.Cdlepe Ave PS Parallel Force Msb.7.23-1(95%)-(2) 1,405.000 27.000 143.000 1.235.0m 1.378,000 1.37BA00 9.Imptovernenis 10 Main SL P.S.,7-7-1(26%)•(2) 067,000 217.000 550.000 100,0m 750.000 750,000 10.Main$1.Pump Station Er wWm.7-7.2(28%)•(3) 775.000 775.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.WVtOVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 25.332.000 2.145.000 993.000 3.935.000 3.484.000 2.450.000 3.100.000 13.962.000 8.450,000 22.412.000 775J100 1.Pump Station WWwarnerts,2-37 (33%)-(3) 1.315.200 /2.200 198.000 198,000 482.000 445.000 1.303A100 1"3.000 2.Pump Station Abandonment,7-14-3 (3) 425.000 75.000 200.000 150.000 425,000 425.000 3.M!"aneous Prefeds 500.000 50.000 50,000 50,000 50.000 50,000 250.000 250,000 500.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 2.240,200 12,200 248.000 323.000 712,000 645.000 50.000 1.478,000 250.000 2,22e.000 ATIONPROJECTS I.Sun6ower MwtmM R".7-21 (M)••m 306.000 1.000 70.000 185,000 50.1100 305.000 305,000 2.Mtsodart ua Repair of Local Sewers (41 5.600.000 100,000 1.200.000 1,200.000 1.200,000 1.200.0m 4.900,000 700.000 5.600.000 SUBTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS S.906A00 1.1100 I 100,000 1.270.000 1,385.0m 1.250.000 1.200A00 5.205,000 700.000 5.905.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 33 476.2%) 2.158.200 1.341.000 6.528,000 5.581.000 4.345.000 4.350.000 21.145.000 9.400.000 30.545.000 7y5J700 •Pa tidly tended by DUM No.14 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY LOA"CONSTRUCTION ParOefy Mrded by District No.1 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY LINDER DESIGN ~•Partially forded by District No.6 3.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION •»•Parody bnded by Dow Dbbkb 4.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN&CONSTRUCTION i Y 4 County Sanitation District No. II Schedule of District Collection System Pro)"_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F 0 H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1907-00 19118-88 1OW2000 200"1 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACITY 1.Slate►Ave.Parrrp Station Roo..11-17-1(1)•(87.6%) 8.520,000 5.150,0W 70,000 70,0W 70.000 2.Goldenwed SL Sewer Repl mn ent 11-17-2(1) 2.730.000 44.000 135.000 500.000 2.000.000 50.000 2.6115,000 2.885.000 3.Slater Ave.Rd d(2) 1.700.000 - 1.700.000 1,700,000 4.Hall lMerceptor(2) 3.150.000 150.000 3.000,000 3,150,000 3.150.000 5.Slaler/SprYrpdele Replacemod(2) 800.000 e00.000 900.000 8.Warner Ave Sewer Relief M 1.500,000 1.5w.22!4 1,500.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAP. 16.400,000 0.495.000 205,ODD 5W.1100 2,000,000 211 .000 3,000,000 5,905,000 1,0W.000 9.905.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIpEIlABtl1IY 1.Km*% w Beach P+sduw Abard.11-18(21 325.000 75.000 250.000 325,000 325.000 2.Pwo Stepan MWfwdemerft.2-37(9%)•I2) 358.300 3,300 54.000 54,0110 126,000 121.000 355.OW 355.000 3.Miscellaneous Pro(erle 800.000 1 150.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 350.000 250,000 1100.000 SUO-TOTAL CAP.IMPR0VEMENTSrRELIABILITY 1.283,3001 3.300 279,000 354,000 170.000 171,000 50.000 1,030,000 250.000 1.280.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 17.683.300 0.498.300 484.000 1154.000 2,178.0W 371,0W 3.050.000 8,935,000 /,2W.000 11.185.000 • PaNaiy haled by DIsIAd No.3 ••Partially handed by Other Districts 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 14 Schedule of District Collection System Prols id..'; CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST 3 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997.98 1998-99 1999.2000 200"1 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS4NCREASE CAPACITY 1.InWrovemenb to Main St.P.S.,7-7-1(72%)*(1) 2.120.000 193.000 103.000 23D.000 1,923,0W 1,923,000 2.Malr Street Pump Station E,panskm.7-7-2(72%)-M 2.000.000 2.000.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.WPROIM ENTSANCREASE CAP. 4.120.000 195,000 1,873.000 250.000 1.923.0W 1.9n mo 2000.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIR�IABII lam[ 1.M some"Pr 18M 230.Wo 23.OW 23,000 23.000 23.000 23.000 123,000 123,000 230A00 SUBTOTAL CAP.04PROVEMENTSIRQ1ABILITY 250.000 23,0W 25.OW 23.000 23,000 23,000 123.0W 123.000 230.OW GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL WPROVEMENTS /,370,000 I 193,000 1,700.000 273,000 I 23.OW 23,0D0 23.000 2A30,000 123A00 2,173,000 2,000.000 • Pwg*haled by DWWI No.? Future conshudlon near 2020.pwU*hailed by D.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION RESOLUTION NO. 97-33-13 INITIATING PROPOSAL TO CONSOLIDATE DISTRICTS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 APPLYING TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 56000, ET SEQ. WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts were originally formed and organized in 1947-48 as separate districts providing sewer services, generally following the drainage patterns of Orange County; and, WHEREAS, Orange County's sewer system is now well-established, and the current main focus of the nine districts is on joint projects and the attendant regulatory issues; and, WHEREAS, over the years, the continuation of the nine districts as separate entities has contributed to certain administrative and financial burdens; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Part 3 of Division 3 of Title 5 of the Government Code, known as the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 ("the Act"), certain local agencies may make request to the Local Agency Formation Commission for a change of organization or a reorganization; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 13 is a local agency authorized to make such a proposal; and, .r WHEREAS, "consolidation" is one type of change of organization or Y reorganization permitted by the Act, defined as the uniting or joining of two or more districts, formed pursuant to the same principal act, into a single new successor district; and, WHEREAS, notice of intent to adopt this resolution of application has not been given to each interested and each subject agency as is permitted, but not required by Government Code Section 56800(b); and, WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be consolidated is inhabited; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of streamlining administration and Board procedures, maintaining financial and other records, and reducing costs, it has been determined by the District that the proposed consolidation will effect substantial administrative benefits and financial savings, both individually and collectively. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: This proposal for a change of organization is made pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 2: The change of organization proposed herein is the consolidation of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 into a single County Sanitation District, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. K Section 3: The boundaries of the affected nine districts are as depicted in Exhibit "A", attached. The boundaries of the proposed consolidated district are as depicted in Exhibit "B", attached. Section 4: Terms and conditions of the proposed consolidation regarding consolidation of assets and financial obligations are set forth on Exhibit "C", attached. Section 5: The number and method of selection of members of the governing Board shall be as provided in California Government Code Section 4730.65. Section 6: The following person is to be furnished with copies of the report by the Executive Officer and to be given mailed notice of the hearing on the proposal: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Section 7: This proposal is to be considered a formal request that proceedings for consolidation be taken pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 8: A plan for providing services within the affected territory is attached as Exhibit "D". Section 9: The effective date of the consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 24, 1997. H:\wp.dta\admin\BS\RES\RES97\97-33-13.doe r STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, PENNY KYLE, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97-33-13 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board on the 24th day of September, 1997, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Mark Schwing, Chair pro tem; Bob Zemel NOES: William G. Steiner ABSENT: Burnie Dunlap, Mark A. Murphy IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, this 24th day of September, 1997. Penny Kyle, cr ry Board of Dire ors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California- HAwp.dta\admin\BST0RMSU7\F13.033.13.doc r EXHIBIT A— Map of Current Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S WNIrneR e�vo Q9�'�'�� LA HABRA qti 9 LAMBElrr Ro C'�`C ti,99O IMPERIAL HWr B EA Gti� CQG� BAsrANelluar ro L biTON "DRSUA LINCA ELVO 13 MALVERN YORBA CNAIMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� �1� I ORAI vrwo AV E 2 '�C QJ LA UENA Rf� PALM uNaouP+AAv�K 5 ANAHEIM o VILLA dO .Aura CYPRESS 1 . TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON Q u LAMITOS O I RAN E W ' � C y Y . CHA/MAN AVE S w o AGARDEN GRO s STMI�ISTE YYESTIANSTER Iwo 1rrN sr B � O 7 m J ` l TUS MC/ oEN sr m � x 11 g SANT W m ANA WARNER AVE 8tt FQUNTA r 1 EIUS AVE ALLEY HUN IN N ADAMS AVB 9 O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE h= 5 NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 EXHIBIT B — Map of Proposed Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 114, wNlrneR eLvo 09 q'I`BI* LA HAB RA �d gtic� gti99 IY/ERIAL HWY COGA-O/,✓O B//REA COGti�-SASTANLNURY AD YORSA UNDA SLVD L ON MALVERN YORBA CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA oRAI ETNo Ave LA U E A I co C� PALM UNN�WIA K ° �. r, I ANAHEIM 0. VILLA 40 BALL RD I CYPRESS ITA AVE PARK LOS STANTON \59 LAMITOS = I RAN E � X b CHA/MAN AVB 21 a GARDEN STMINS S wvwrwNSTERkVI 1rrN Sr i s 70 B < W Tus � Arc P,ODIN ST g SANT W o ANA WARNER AVE 8 F UNTA a EIUS AVE ALLEY HUN INGT N 0 ADAMS AV1 .PACIFIC AWLTONAVE CiOST OCEAN MESA IRVINE p e4. �r rP ' NEWPORT BEACH N n � _ SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 r i Exhibit C LAFCO Application Terms & Conditions Consolidation of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1. The nine separate districts known jointly as the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ("CSDOC") shall be consolidated into one single county sanitation district pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code Sections 4730 et seq.) and shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County ("District'). [G.C. §56844(v)] (As used herein, "CSDOC" refers to the nine Districts, both jointly, singly and in any combination.) 2. As a result of consolidating, the nine existing districts shall be dissolved and be reorganized as one consolidated District with one consolidated Board of Directors under California Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. At the time of consolidation, the Board of Directors would include representatives from the following jurisdictions: [G.C. §56844(n)] • County (1) - County of Orange Unincorporated Area • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Santa Ana Buena Park La Habra Seal Beach Cypress La Palma Stanton Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Tustin Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District 3. Directors of District shall be compensated in accordance with applicable state law. Pagel y 4. All system facilities shall be transferred from existing CSDOC to District as of the effective date of consolidation in an "as-is" condition, without any payment or repair obligation from CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(k)(v)] 5. All lands, buildings, real and personal property, assets and appurtenances held by CSDOC, as of the effective date of the consolidation, shall be transferred to District. Such assets are enumerated in the CSDOC Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ending June 30, 1997. [G.C. §56844(b)] 6. District shall be designated as the successor to CSDOC and retain all of the rights, duties and obligations of the former CSDOC with respect to enforcement, performance or payment of any outstanding bonds, contracts or obligations of the former CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(m)] 7. All previously authorized charges, fees assessments and/or taxes currently in effect by CSDOC shall be continued by District. [G.C. §56844(t)] 8. The establishment of Special Zones within District, pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 4850 et seq., shall be effected on July 1, 1998 and shall collectively include any or all portions of the entire CSDOC service area and individually include the specified areas as shown on the nine attached maps. The existing rate schedules within each of the Special Zones shall continue as presently in effect by each District within CSDOC until such time as amended by the District's Board of Directors. The annual sewer service charge can only be amended by a vote of two-thirds of all members of the governing body. [G.C. §56844(e)] 9. All agreements by and between any two or more existing CSDOC's, including but not limited to: joint sewer ownership or use, construction or maintenance of facilities, shall be terminated upon the effective date of the consolidation. The termination of the agreements is appropriate in recognition of the new District assuming full and exclusive ownership and authority over all rights, duties and obligations of all existing CSDOC's. 10. To the extent not inconsistent with the terms of the consolidation, and as necessary to carry out the original intent, all contracts between the Irvine Ranch Water District and one or more existing CSDOC's, including those relating to ownership of capacity rights in treatment, disposal and sewer facilities, shall be assigned to District and remain in full force and effect. All contracts between County Sanitation District No. 14 and one or more Page 2 CSDOC's shall also be assigned to the new District and remain in full force and effect. 11. CSDOC shall transfer any and all indebtedness and the obligation to levy taxes, charges, assessments, or fees in order to make payment of said indebtedness to District. [G.C. §56844(c)] 12. CSDOC shall file a statement with LAFCO that the reorganization shall not adversely affect or impair the status of any employee of CSDOC or District. As of the effective date of this reorganization, all employees of CSDOC shall become employees of District. Rates of pay, accrued vacation and sick leave, vacation and sick leave accrual rates, employee rights, insurance, retirement benefits, and all other benefits and programs shall be transferred over to District at then-current levels. Memoranda of Understanding in place under CSDOC shall be transferred to the new District. [G.C. §56844(l)] 13. Permits issued to CSDOC by any federal, state or local regulatory authority, shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties as contained within the permits and to continue operations without interruption. Such permits shall include but not be limited to: CSDOC's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit, including a waiver for full secondary treatment pursuant to Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act, and all other air and land permits. [G.C. §56844(v)] 14. Permits issued by CSDOC shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties contained in said permits and in the laws authorizing the issuance of said permits. Such permits shall include but not be limited to Sewer Connection Permits and Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permits. [G.C. §56844(c)] 15. District shall assume all existing contracts and obligations presently in full force and effect with CSDOC and which have not otherwise been specifically referenced herein. [G.C. §56844(m)] 16. The effective date of this consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. [G.C. §56844(p)] Page 3 Map of Special Zone 1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, WNIrnER BLVD Q 9� LA HABRA gq�l.^ne�'9.►, LAMBERT RD IMPERIAL NWV CQ(�ti O/�QC B EA BASTAN NUM L ON VORBA LIN.OA BLVO MALVERN YORBA 13 CHA►MAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA q'L� OJ�1 OM 10ETIIO AVE 2 �G UE A LA A K PALM uN wAV 5 ANAHEIM o VILLA O BALL RD Cy RESS i TA VE PARK LOS STANTON 3 a LAMITOS Q RANGE S N CNA►MAN AVE S y GARD N o GRO STMI S SE WEsrMINSTER VE m T US Mcs Nsr '�T. 8 F UNTA a� E GAVE ALLEY HUN INGOT N ADAMSAVII6 gr O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA ,° IRVINE O5 g~ ' NEWPORT BEACH COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS y N OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, wNIrnER elvo 9�' LA HABRA 9 LAMBERT RD Oq9~cc�cq�'�q� IMPERIAL NWY O c 8 IF IRAS. L ON toasA ln+Dw'aLVO • MAWERN YORBA - 13 CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA UNDA . ORA ETNo AVE 5 o UE A bw (. c0 � PALM PA K C ANAHEIM o� BALL RD CY RE S I a �fILLA 1O LOS m STANTON X. PARK e LAMITOS O p CH R/tN E y.►. ... O �Y STMI S SE W ...TER Ve 17TN sT B 7 u O TUS S F = MC FADOGN sT 11 g SANT 14 W m ANA WARNER AVE J , 8 F UNTA o 1 E US AVE ALLEY F ? HUN NGTGN ADAMS AVIy O PACIFIC MILTONAVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE O5 ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS sera a rw OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 r Map of Special Zone 3 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S �9 rv«irnsa ewo:; O9 �ec�` LA HASRA �� 9�c 9tiq L{MSERY 11D» :wPERNLC B EA GGArwJ� BASTA HURV YORBA LINDA BLVD L ON YORBA 13 wAwERN .: CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA .fl J� oRA E7H0 AVE 2 O G �y c� PALM L PA K t 5 ANAHEIM` a VILLA 40 :: CY :R S I VE PARK LAMITO s AN E 3 0 � a m m GAR Q S'TNII SE weirMaeasEx vs:: ,rn,sr e 7 ;,: :. s u 1 O T US MCP EN BT SANT F 14 ANA WARNER AVE HU IN J Q� FC�N iADAUS'1�V`3>� 6 �g O PACIFIC AMILTONAVE COST OCEAN MESA �'° IRVINE O5 g` ' NEWPOR7 BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 J Map of Special Zone 5 LOS ANGELES COUNTY s,A• WNITMO BLVD Qn 9,ren LA HABRA LAMBERT RD V V(C^17.r9q w. IMPERIAL NWV V `OG�O/"✓O� B EA BASTAN HURT L ON roRBA LINDA BLVD MALVERN YORBA 13 CMAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'b� J�1 OM ETHO AVE I 2 O � L. �G LA �., PALM L, PA K r, ANAHEIM o VILLA Q �o BALL RD CY RE S I TA VE PARK LOS STANTON 3 N LAMITOS O I S RAN�E W o e F � � � � 3 > Y e CNAPMAN AVB i y GAR D N GRO STMI S S WEBfWNSTER(LVE 1TTN BT 7 = W < O TUS Me Pi D0614 ST w (0 ,- g SANT ' 4 W ANA WARNER AVE 8 c, F UNTA r E B AVE ALLEY ,tip r� c HUN'INGT4N ADu1MS A GJ �9 9r 0 PACIFIC COST OCEAN MESA ,° '` '" IRVINE e . 5 NEWP:ORT: ` gE.. N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' �oaaorrw OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 •1 Map of Special Zone 6 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, WNITTIER BLVD 1+ LA HABRA LAMBERT RD C� �•, IMPERIAL NWVC' B EA QG,y� BASTA HUM RD VORBA LINDA BLVD MALVERN L ON YORBA 13 CHAPMAN AVE LIN DA 9'L� LACENTIA �y 9s GOJ� ORA ET1b AVE I 2 'Q�O �5 UE A �v LA PALM LAN PA K 5 ANAHEIM o VILLA O �O BALLAD CY RE S I T VE PARK LOS STANTON 3 LAMITOS O <s AN E m m > Y o GNAPWNAV S W �`�� GARD N 0 � GRO sTMI s S` WESTMNSTBR VE 1TTN ST q 7 OTus MG F EN ST 0 . 1SANT M. ANA WARNER AVE .1 8 FOUNT41tr E USAVE ALLEY HUN N N ADAMS A 4 yr PACIFIC AMLTON AVE OCEAN COST. . ..:::.. IRVINE ONEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTSa�.� OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1195 Map of Special Zone 7 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, wNIrnER BLVD LA HABRA LAMBERT RD IMPERIAL HWV EA cOG,I,O/�00 BASTAB NURY OGw_ ON YORBA UNDA BLVD L MALVERN YORBA 33 CNAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� OJ�1 OM ETNO AVE 2 �G UE A LA �Co PALMA UN LN AV PA E K I ; CO ANAHEIM o VILLA O BALL ID CYPRESS I T VE PARK LOS STANTON 3 LAMITOS O s RAN G E � > 1=C � CNAPMAN AVE I N o r GA N GRO STMI S SE WESTMINSTER VE 1TTN ST 9 W 7 m m O O MC F DDEN ST SANT W m ANA WARNER AVE E S AVEALLEY 1 H HUN IN N J � ACAMS AVOO 9 g! O PACIFIC AMILTONAVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE 5 ?!P~ NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 1 Map of Special Zone 11 LOS ANGELES COUNTY WNITTIER BLVO 9•r LA HABRA e9 O9�•V �F9.1, LAMBERT RD CFC q'90w- IMPERIAL MWV B EA BASTA NURV L ON YORBA LIN.DA BLVD MALVERN YORBA 13 `"""""NAVE LACENTIA LINDA � 9 GOJ� OM ETNO AVE I �l �5 UE A !. �., LA PALM uN WA K AV Og ANAHEIM o VILLA mu RD CY RE S I TA vE PARK 40 LOS STANTONJ 0 LAMITOS O RAN�E 39 1112 m J Y W W 3 > Y m CMA►MAN AV i 0 rj GARD N a GRO STMI S SE wESTMNsmR VE Irm ST B Y W u < us O S :::;:::::i:: :::':::► :::i::i MD FADDEN ST SANTA 14 ANA WARNER AVE i F UNTA r� �a 1 E LIS AVE ALLEY HUN: NG i TON oq 'i ADAMS AVIOJ yr i O w :u PACIFIC Am�m OST OCEAN C MESA �° IRVINE O5 g~ ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 13 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, IV- 94, WHITTIER BLVO e LA HABRA LAMBERT RO .. . Q�e IMFEAIAL NWY VV ... �O B EA BASTAN NURY L ON YORBA LINOA BLVO MALVERN CNA►MAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA OMI ETNO AV NO E J 2 O C� G I O 5 UE A LA PA K PALM14 u LN AV g ANAHEIM o VILLA `' oBALL RV CY RE S i LOS TA AVE PARK STANTON g y LAMITOS k R O S RAN E 3 O 3 ¢ m J W S Y e CNA►MANAVB i p JG G Rol N ST 11 ST SE WESTMNSTER I1VE 1TM ST s 7 W u < O� e TUS MC F DOEN ST �•9),� 00 SANT aW m ANA WARNER AVE J 8 F UNTA o� 1 E US AVE ALLE HUN INGTON J�PP rF9 GT ' 0 ADAMSAVE, 6J 9 g' / O PACIFIC AMILTONAVE COST OCEAN MESA 0'° IRVINE O5 �~ ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �ALLO/YAL� OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, WNITTIER BLVD B LA HABRA L^,t7 9gq./1 F9 LAMBERT RD �1 C LO IMPERIAL HWV B EA BASTA NURV L ON roRBA LINDA BLVD MALVERN YORBA 13 CNAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9 GOJ��' oRANOETNo AVE i 2 �5 LA U E A II �LF1 c$ PALM UNCDLPN'A�K I ; g� I ANAHEIM w VILLA �o BALL AD CY RE S I dD TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON 8 LAMITOS C O i S RANGE F W N J Y CNAPMAN AV B S y m W ARD o � G N � GRO STMI S S wnrbmSTER VE 17rm Sr 7 S j G7 < 1 H O T USm � MCP DEN S7 :.>:;i:iii_i' 11 3 g SANT 0 ANA w WARNER AVE J r 8 FU NTA El f Q A LLEY 1 114 AVE y:..r I ADAMS AVIII 0 6 .: . PACIFIC AMILTONAVE COST OCEAN MESA '° lRYINE �� e a v, , 1 JP . . o5 ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ° OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Exhibit D Plan of Services for the Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County L INTRODUCTION This Plan of Services has been prepared pursuant to Government Code Section 56653, which requires that a plan for providing services within the affected territory be provided whenever an application for a change of organization is submitted to LAFCO. This document will facilitate the consolidation of the nine (9) existing County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) into one single County Sanitation District pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq. The resulting consolidated agency shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County (District). This consolidation proposes a transfer of all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of CSDOC to the District. The Plan of Services provides a description of CSDOC and its operations and how they will be consolidated as the District. Il. DESCRIPTION OF CSDOC A. General Information The CSDOC is made up of nine independent special districts. Each district is a political subdivision of the State of California and is governed by a representative of each city and sanitary district within the district and, if the District includes unincorporated territory, a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Each district has its own budget. All districts except District Nos. 13 and 14 have their own tax rate and trunk sewer systems. District No. 13 buys capacity in the other districts' transmission facilities. A Joint Administrative Organization was formed in 1948 to administer the business of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities and the activities common to all districts. This is provided for in a Joint Ownership Operation and Construction Agreement. The day-to-day operation of the organization is under the direction of a General Manager, one assistant general manager, eight department heads, for an authorized staff of 560 full time equivalents for the Fiscal Year 1997-98. B. Types of Services, Level, and Range of Service Currently Provided The CSDOC is a single-purpose public entity formed solely for the collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater and its residuals and serves the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal needs of approximately 2.2 million people. During 1996-1997, an average daily sewage influent flow of 244 million gallons per day (MGD) was treated and 510 wet tons per day of residual solids (biosolids) was produced. CSDOC encompasses a 470 square-mile area of Orange County that includes 23 of the County's 31 cities. CSDOC operates the third largest wastewater management agency of its kind west of the Mississippi, with assets valued at more than $1 billion dollars. The nine individual districts own about 650 miles of major trunk sewers, 22 pumping stations and two major treatment plants with disposal facilities to safely discharge the treated effluent through an ocean outfall into deep ocean waters. The treatment plants process an average of 244 million gallons of wastewater per day. Page 1 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley. It has a current operational primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 108 MGD and a secondary treatment capacity of 66 MGD currently being expanded to 80 MGD. Treatment Plant No. 2 is in Huntington Beach. It has a primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 186 MGD. Plant No. 2 provides advanced primary treatment to all of the wastewater that enters the plant and secondary treatment to up to 90 MGD of the total flow. Table 1 highlights the service area characteristics and system features. Table 1 Service Area Joint Works Facilities -As of June 30, 1997 Total Population Served (estimated) 2,275,000 Service Area (estimated) 470 square miles Total Number of Cities Served 23 Total Miles of Trunk Sewers 650 Number of Pumping Stations 22 Number of Treatment Plants 2 Primary Treatment Capacity (includes standby) Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 Total Primary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 MGD Secondary Treatment Capacity Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 Total Secondary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . 156 MGD Total Capacity 450 MGD Reported Average Daily Flow Plant No. 1 . . . . . . 90 MGD Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 MGD Total Average Daily Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2ALMGD Page 2 i I I r CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service C. Description of Sanitary Sewer System CSDOC processes wastewater from the collection systems of the various cities, water districts and local sewer agencies. They do not deal directly with individual customers except for portions of District No. 7, which is located primarily in unincorporated territory of the County near Tustin. CSDOC's assets consist of individual district assets and each district's respective share of jointly owned assets. Table 2 summarizes the respective District ownership in jointly owned and separately owned property, plant, equipment and construction in progress, at cost, as of June 30, 1997: Table 2 District Ownership Jointly Owned Separately Owned Total Total property, plant and equipment $804,200,000 $321,300,000 $1,135,500,000 Less accumulated $310,200.000 depreciation Net property, plant and equipment $825,300,000 D. Additional Assets In addition to its real property and facilities, CSDOC owns service vehicles, equipment, tools, repair parts inventory, and communications and office equipment. CSDOC maintains cash, liquid securities to meet its cash flow requirements, and other reserves..The following table summarizes the districts' reserves budgeted for the end of Fiscal Year 1996-97. Table 3 Reserves Analysis "Dry Period" Operating Cash Flow $28,021,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,221,000 Debt Service Reserves Fund Balance 59,724,000 Capital Reserves 49,233,000 Environmental Requirements Reserves 4,484,000 Flood/Earthquake Insurance Reserves 81,450,000 Rate Stabilization Funds 141,200,000 Total $375,333,000 Page 3 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D ' Plan of Service E. Liabilities As of June 30, 1997, CSDOC liabilities included debt in the amount of approximately $397,575,000. These issues include $397,45,000 of Certificates of Participation (COP) and $30,000 of general obligation (G.O.) bonds. The Districts have maintained their AA- rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and Aa rating from Moody's Investor Services, although all COP issues are backed by issuance of letters of credit and are rated AAA. The Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget provides for$32,620,000 to service the debt on the various COPS issued. In addition, there is a $15,000 annual payment to maturity in January 1999 for the G.O. bonds in District No. 1 1. Consolidation of the districts will have no impact on the liabilities of CSDOC. Under consolidation into a single County Sanitation District, the new County Sanitation District assessments all predecessor district obligations. Further, the districts are presently joined by agreement to manage and fund liabilities. The new consolidated District will establish special zones upon consolidation to continue differential user fees and to ensure that predecessor districts' outstanding debt is serviced by only those residents who originally assumed that debt. The boundaries of each zone will be the same as those of each predecessor district. The new consolidated District will establish nine (9) zones to differentiate and account for costs, revenues and liabilities of the existing districts. In addition, an Improvement District (ID) could be formed coincident with each predecessor district's service area to enable proper segregated accounting for the retirement of the existing Certificates of Participation (COPS) debt. As new future borrowing may occur, new ID's would be formed to include the service area benefiting from the projects. Such new ID's would not necessarily have boundaries congruent with the zones. For projects at the treatment plants, however, an ID to include all of the new District's service area could be formed to properly allocate the cost of such improvements that would benefit all the zones. It is also expected that the consolidated District would continue the practice of dedicating Ad Valorem Taxes where it would be collectable within a zone to the retirement of long-term debt of an appropriate ID. F. Management and Employees CSDOC presently operates in a consolidated fashion pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code Section 4840 et seq. CSDOC currently employs approximately 560 full-time employees. Legal Services are provided by the law firm of Woodruff, Spradlin and Smart auditing services are also provided by contract. In addition, various other services are contracted-out. These include such varied services as groundskeeping, environmental review, ocean research and reporting, etc. CSDOC's organization chart is included in CSDOC's Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget which is submitted along with this application. The existing net joint operation budget for Fiscal Year 1997-98 is $46,922,650. Consolidation of the districts into a single District would result in the continuation of management and operational structures and functional expenditures similar to those described above. Operations of the new District would remain the same as the current operations of CSDOC. Consequently, there would be no change in employee compensation and employee benefits as adjustments would not be required. The transition from the existing joint operation to a single District operation would have no impact on employees, their occupational status, or their benefits. Page 4 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service G. Rates and Charges Each district, except District No. 14, has an adopted Sanitary Sewer Service Fee to provide funding for operating the sewer systems in accordance with the Clean Water Act and CSDOC's Revenue Program. District No. 14 is funded through the payment of an annual charge by the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) directly to CSDOC. IRWD levies and collects individual user charges from each parcel receiving service. Sanitary Sewer Service Fees are set annually by each district after a review of projected needs. In May, 1997, The Board of Directors adopted a user rate increase fee schedule that provides for gradual rate increase over the next five years for six of the nine districts. This represents that first user rate increase in seven years. The Districts have been able to avoid user fee increases by reducing operational costs through reorganizing and streamlining Districts operations, holding vacant positions open, and deferring new facilities. However, because the Districts' capital improvement program's debt service obligations continued to increase beyond the level of its primary funding source, i.e. property tax revenues, and because of the additional capital improvement requirements, increase in user fees became inevitable. The following is the adopted Annual Sewer Service Fee Rate Schedule District 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 1 $91.36 $100.27 $110.04 $120.77 $132.55 2 $73.00 $75.00 $77.00 $80.00 $82.00 3 $75.00 $76.00 $77.00 $78.00 $80.00 5 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 6 $78.00 $80.00 $82.00 $84.00 $86.00 7 $55.00 $60.00 $66.00 $73.00 $80.00 11 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 $101.25 $113.91 13 1 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 As was indicated previously, establishment of special zones upon consolidation would continue the existing schedules of differential Sanitary Sewer Service Fees until such time as amended by action of the governing body. Said fees shall not be amended without a two- thirds vote of all members of the governing body. Consolidation is expected to facilitate reorganizing and streamlining the new District's operations. H. Summary of Revenues and Expenses The CSDOC Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget, which is included in this application package, contains detailed information regarding revenues and expenses. Attention is called to Section 3, pages 1-13, of the Budget document for summary information. 1_t11. DESCRIPTION OF THE CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT A. General Page 5 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D v Plan of Service The nine independent County Sanitation Districts currently collectively known as CSDOC, and which utilize joint operating, working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, will be consolidated into a single County Sanitation District pursuant to the California County Sanitation District Act(Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq.). The boundaries of the consolidated District will be the same as the outer boundaries of those nine predecessor districts. B. Types of Services, Level and Range of Services The new District will assume all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of the former CSDOC. The District will own and operate the wastewater treatment system which provides sewage collection, treatment and disposal services currently owned and operated by the nine (9) Sanitation Districts known jointly as CSDOC. C. District Structure The District' s organization will be the same as that structure which presently exists under the CSDOC joint operating agreement for the operation and administration of the joint facilities. D. Governing Board Composition The new District will be formed under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65. Under Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65, the governing body of the consolidated District would be made up of a 25-member board representing local cities, sanitary districts and the County of Orange unincorporated area. Board membership would decrease from 29 to 25 with the loss of double representation for the Cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Yorba Linda and the County of Orange. The proposed governing Board formed under Section 4730.65 would include the following agencies: • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Tustin Buena Park La Habra Santa Ana Cypress La Palma Seal Beach Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Stanton Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District I • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District • County (1) -County of Orange (to represent the Unincorporated Areas) Page 6 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service E. Three Year Budget of the Consolidated District It is anticipated that revenues and expenditures which would have been budgeted by CSDOC for the operation and administration of joint facilities and the construction of capital improvements will be the basis for the new District's financial plan. Attachment A is a 3-year projection of the District's budget under consolidation. The projection covers Fiscal Years 1998-99, 1999-2000 and 2000-2001. Attachment B is a summary of anticipated capital improvements for the new District. This summary of capital needs was derived from CSDOC's Joint Works Capital Improvements Budget. Lz IMPACTS ON CUSTOMERS There will be no negative financial impact on customers. No rate changes are anticipated as a result of the consolidation. Please refer to previous discussion regarding the formation of special zones. V. IMPACTS ON OTHER JURISDICTIONS There will be no service level impacts on any of the cities, sanitary districts, and other agencies presently relying on services provided by CSDOC as the services responsibilities, without modification, will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Effective date is proposed as July 1, 1998. LI. IMPACTS ON REGIONAL PARTICIPATION All CSDOC's contractual obligations will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Accordingly, there are no anticipated impacts. Page 7 915/97 Consolidated Sanitation Distrct of Orange County Proiected Budgets Fiscal Years 1998-99 Thru 2000-01 991 8-1999 1999-2000 002 0-2001 Revenues Industrial/Commercial Use Fees $ 9,317,000 $ 10,714,000 $ 12,322,000 Sewer Service Fees 65,938,000 68,907,000 72,436,000 Fees From Other Agencies 6,150,000 4,700,000 5,250,000 Connection Fees 6,784,000 8,065,000 9,727,000 Interest 22,443,000 22,420,000 21,749,000 Miscellaneous &Other 2,640,500 4,141,500 4,141,500 Property Taxes 30,572,000 30,565,000 30,562,000 New COP Issues 53,200,000 67,000,000 62,400,000 Total Revenues $ 197,044,500 $ 206,512,500 $ 218,587,500 Requirements Collection System O&M Expenses $ 9,553,000 $ 10,804,000 $ 10,527,000 Treatment System O&M Expenses 47,861,000 48,818,000 49,794,000 Collection System Improvements 20,997,000 24,902,000 26,497,000 Treatment System Improvements 70,086,000 78,429,500 96,380,500 GO Bond Principal&Interest 16,000 16,000 - Costs of New COP Issuance 2,660,000 2,850,000 3,120,000 COP Service&Retirement 37,772,000 42,590,000 47,834,000 Total Expenses $ 188,945,000 $ 208,409,500 $ 234,152,500 Revenue Exceeding Expenses $ 8,099,500 $ (1,897,000) $ (15,565,000) Beginning Cash Balances 385,031,450 393,130,950 391,233,950 Ending Cash Balances $ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,668,950 Appropriations, Dedications & Reserves "Dry Period"Operating Cash Flow $ 28,800,000 $ 30,121,000 $ 30,737,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,483,000 11,925,000 12,064,000 Capital Projects Completion 49,995,000 49,946,200 49,540,100 Environmental Requirements Reserve 4,634,000 4,484,000 4,484,000 Required Debt&COP Service Reserves 38,359,000 41,133,000 44,230,000 "Dry Period"COP Service Cash Flow 27,705,350 31,244,600 35,022,350 Property&Liability Catastrophe Reserve 89,752,850 90,971,850 91,208,250 Rate Stabilization Funds 142,401,750 131,408,300 108,383,250 •$ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,668,950 Unappropriated Cash &Investment Balances $ - $ - $ - County Sanitation District No. 1 SchWub of obWd Colbd 1W Syst"n Prolgd. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A 0 C D E F 0 H 1 i K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST RED FIVE EST S YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO2020 PURCHASES 1Y57-05 low" 1OW2000 2000-01 2001-M YEAR TOTAL 2002.2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 1.mudena m Pf%*ft 250.000 25,000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.00D 125.000 125.000 250.000 ,SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMEMSIRELIABILTTY 250,000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25,000 25,000 123,000 125.000 2W.Ow REHABILITATION PROJECTS 1.Santa AM Tnn*Sewer Rehab.(1) 6.300.000 75.000 13.000 6.225.000 6.300.000 2.Smtllower Manhole Rehab.(1)7-21•(30%) 140.000 30.000 50.000 30.000 140.000 140.000 3.Dyer Road ManitoN Rehab.(1) 350,D00 - 50.000 200,000 100.000 350.000 350,00D 4.Mab.Dyw ManhoN Rehab.(1) 350.000 50.000 100,000 150.000 200.000 350.000 5.onwriWa4kMhan Mwdwb Rehab.(1) 200.Ow 50.000 100.000 .150.000 50.000 200.000 S.Rate SL Matfiola Rehab.(1) 230.00t1 230.000 230.000 SUB-TOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 7.570,000 75,000 30.000 130.WO 330,000 300,OD0 1155.000 5,705.000 7.570,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1.820.000 100.000 55.000 155.000 I 3S5,000 325.000 1 Yo0.000 1 6.00.000 TAW.000 • P"aay AxWed by DWM No.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 2 Schedule of District Collodion System Pro)eath CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARE TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2W2.2007 YEAR TOT COMPLETE CAPITAL IAAPROVEMENTMNCREASE CAPACITY 1.Replace Eudld Rdd Trunk Sewer,P.1 to Edinger(1) 8,750,4100 6,750,000 6.750.000 2.Repiacemenl d Ne+shope Placentia Trunk 2-3R(2) 8,500,000 2SO,OOD 3,000,000 3,250,000 3,250,000 B,SOO.t100 3.Replatxmerd d Cypress Ave.SubtnnA. 24R(2) 5,750,000 250,000 2.000,tl00 3,000,000 500,000 5,750,000 5.750.000 1.Tell Interceptor Sewer,2.8-3(1) 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 5.Batavia lktcokt Trunk ReOief(1) 325,000 325,000 325,000 8.Boise Sewer Relief(1) 460,000 460.000 460.000 T.Santa Ma RNer Intr(S.A.R.I.)Relief,2-31•(1) 13,414,000 64,000 350.000 2AOOA00 5,000.000 5,000.0W 12,350,0W 1,t100.000 13,350,000 S.Carbon Canyon Dam Tnnk Sewer 8 P.S.Abarrdn.(2) 1.775,000 175,000 1,500,0W 100,0W 1,775,000 1,775.0m SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTS01WM 1SE CAP. 38,774,000 64.0001 175,000 1 2,100.000 I 4,100.000 1 6,250,000 r 8.500.000 23.125.000 13,585,000 38,710.000 CAPffALIMPROVEMENT 1.Abandonment d Yorbe Linda Pimp Station (2) 2W,000 50,0W 50.000 150.000 200,000 2.Santa Ana River b*Manhole 6 Access,2-%SR2•(1) 5,052,000 452,000 200.000 200.000 2.000.000 2,000.000 200.000 4,600,0W 4,600.000 3.91 Freeway VNdenkp Projects,2.7A" 105,000 92,000 13,000 13,000 13.000 4.1-5 Freeway Wldenlnp Projed.2-35 •• 109.000 15.000 50,000 44,0W 94.000 94,000 S.1-5 Freeway tM mInp Project.2-3A •• 24,000 4,000 20,000 20.000 20.000 S.Saran Ana Rim Intr Shut OR Gals ReptaoemerM 325,0W 75.000 250,0W 325,000 325,000 7.Purnp Station Inprovernm s,2.37•(10%) 398.7W 3.700 60,000 60.0W 140,000 135.0W 395,0W 395.000 8.Wscellaneaua Projects 600,000 100,00o 100.0W IW,D O 100,000 100,0W 500,000 iG0,000 SWAW SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENT SIRELU181UiY 6,813.700 588,7W 518.000 851,000 2,240,W0 2,235.000 I 350.000 1 5.997.0001 250.000 1 0.247,000 I.Euclid Tnnk Manhole Rehab.2-MR 952,000 122,000 70,000 M.W0 30.bW 830.000 830.000 2.South Santa Ana RW Trunk Easement 2.39 16,000 18,0W SUBTOTAL REW181UTATION PROJECTS 968,000 138,000 70,000 MAW 30.000 830.000 830.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL 11111PROVEMENTS 44.555.700 768,7m 783,000 3.484.000 6,370,000 10.485.000 8.850.000 29,95$000 13.11M.000 43,787.000 • Partially ttrrded by Other Districts ••Costs to be reknbrrsed by Catrans 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION 2.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN 3 CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 3 Schedule of District Collection System ProJests- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A 8 C 0 E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST RED EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 1998-99 1OW2000 200"1 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSHNCREASE CAPACITY 1.Artesia Branch Stt*w t Rebel 13) 400.OW 50,000 300.000 50.000 400.000 400,000 2.West"Relief Irdaeeptor Parallel(3) 5,700.000 5,700,000 5,700.000 3.WAstside Relief Tn"(3) 700.000 700,000 7110,000 4.Orange-Western Sublrunk Relief Sewer,3.25(2) 1.207.000 57,0m 1w wo 1,000,000 50,000 1.150.000 1.150.000 5.Knoll INT Relief.Orangetlorps to Artesia(3) 3.300,000 100,000 1.500.000 1,500,000 3.100,000 200,000 3.300.000 6.Hoover-Western Sum Relief on Trask(3) 1.050.000 50.000 500.000 500.000 1.050,0W 1.050.000 7.Miber-Holder,Artesia to Hillsborough.3-38-1 12) 5,335.000 65.000 150•000 3.000,000 2.000,000 120.000 5.270,000 5.270,000 II.Miller-Holder lmprov.. Imperial Hwy..3-38-312) 3.330.000 230.000 2.000.000 1.000,000 100.000 3.100.000 3,1W.000 9.Los Alamitos Srbtns*Rebel 13) 5.000.000 5,000.000 5.000,000 10.Magnolia Relief Swr.Wstmin.-Trask 3-351114(1) 2.300,000 300.000 1.800.000 200.000 .2.000,000 2.0W,000 11.Slater Ave.Pump Station Repl.,11.174or In 4%) 1.238.000 1.228.000 10.000 1 10.0001 10,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAP. 29,560.000 1.880.000 3.960,0001 4,200.000 1 2,400.000 1 3,420.000 2.1W,000 16,080.000 I 1/.600.000 27,680,000 rAvITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILfTY 1.To"*Pipe Clatnt,3-36" 2.112.000 2.012.000 100,000 100.000 100,000 2. 1-5 Freeway WdenYp.3-37"" 43,000 13.000 20.000 10.000 30,0%) 30.000 3.Reloc Portion of Los Afamiios Subtnadc,3-0.1 65.000 50.000 15.000 15.000 15.000 4.Pump Station bnprovemerds.2-37-(14%) 558.2W 5.2W 54.000 $4.000 196,000 189,000 553,000 553.000 5.Miscsllaneoue Praleds 1.000.000 100.000 100,000 100,000 11)0.000 100.000 5W.000 500,000 1.000.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 3.778 2W 2.080.200 319,0001 194.0001 296.0001 289,0001 1W.000 I 1,198.000 1 500.01)01 1,698.000 REHABILITATION PROJECTS 1.Nichols Sheet Tnx*Poch Rehab'(57.0%) (4) s 000 500,000 600.000 2.Magnobe Tnadc Sewer Rehab.3-35R (2) 3,708.000 900.000 750.000 1,5W.DW 550.000 2,800,000 2,6(10,000 3.Seal Beach Blvd.Rehab.,3.1IR 98.000 38.000 20,000 40.000 60,0%) 60,000 SUBTOTAL REHABWATION PROJECTS 1 4.306.000 946.000 770,0001 1.540.0001 550.000 2,880,000 1 500,000 1 2.3W.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 37.644.2W 4.9W.200 5.049,000 5,934=1 3,246,000 1 3,709,0W 2.200,000 1 20,136,000 1 12,600,000 1 32,738,0W Parbay landed by Oistricl No.11 1.MASTER41LANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION "Claim/Appeal Pent ing 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN -Perastly krrrded by Othar Districts 3 MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION ••••Sub)ed to reimbursement by CALTRANS 4.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN it CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 5 Schedule of District Collection System Projects_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REO FIVE EST S YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997.98 1898-88 IM2000 2000.01 200f-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2W7 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACITY 1.W.Coast I"Gravity Tnmk Rehab,S37-3(20%)•(1) 619,000 599.0m 20.000 20,000 20.000 PUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 619.000 399.000 20.000 20.000 20.0W 1.NewpaA Blvd.6 PM W&minp.S41•(42%) 2W.OW 20,000 1110,0W 20.000 160,000 190,000 2.Relocation of Udo PunW S M.S41-1`•' M.000 25.OW 225,0W 575.000 70,000 870.Ow e70,o00 3.Pump Station Mnprownerds.2.37—(28%) 1,110.4m 10,400 168,000 168,000 392,000 378,000 1.106,1100 1,108.000 4.Mlsodwmn Projects 350.000 125.000 1 25,0001 25.OW 1 25.0001 25.000 22S,t100 1 125.WD 1 350,000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIAMLJTY 1 2.561.4001 55.400 678.000 1 788,0001 467.0001 403,000 1 25.0001 2.381.0001 125.0001 2.506.000 1.Big Carryon Tnmk Rehabilitation(2) 2.00o.OD0 50.OW 90g000 1.000.000 50,000 2.P 10.000 2.000.000 2.Beboa Perv*mh Rehab 500.000 600,000 5W.000 SUB-TOTAL REHAB RATION PROJECTS 2,500.W0 50.000 900,000 1,000,1100 50,000 2,OOD,000 6W.000 2.SW.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 5.660.400 654,400 698.000 838.W0 I 1.387.000 I 1.403.000 1 75.000 4,401A00 I 625.000 5.026.000 •ParOs9y Amdad by Dldrld No.8 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY L04OER CONSTRUCTION ••Partially NrMed by 011w Dleblds 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION •••Costs par0elly shared WM CYy at Newport B-ch . v . County Sanitation District No. 6 000000001 Schedule of District Collection System Prblecb CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C 0 E F Q H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REQ EST REG EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 19W99 1999-20M 2000-01 200M YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTrANCREASE 1.W.Coad Hwy Gravity Tnark Rehab.5-37J(80%)'(1) 2.470.000 2,398.0W 90.000 80.000 80,000 2.Fakvbw R@W. Baker St.b VAson St.,6-12(21 3.445.000 380,000 1.000.000 1,700,o00 355.000 3.085.0W 3.085.000 3.Dtabid 8 Tnx*Partial(3) 1,325,000 25,000 3W.000 1.000,000 1,325,000 1,325,000 4.Dover Drive Trunk Parallel(3) 1,500,000 100.000 1,000,000 400.000 1.5W.000 1.500.000 5.C~Ave.P.S.Paratal F.M.(5%)-(?) 74,000 1,500 7,500 65.000 72.500 TZ500 SUB-TOTAL CAP.utpROVEMENTrANCREASB CAP. 1 8.820.0001 2,777,500 I 87.500 I 1.085,000 I 1.825.000 1 1.083.0001 1,4W.000 8,042,5W 8.042,5W CAPrrAL 'RnZF7IABILQY 1.Newport OW.8 PCH 1AAdardng.5-41158%) 271.000 26.000 221,000 26.000 249.OW 249.000 2.Wdaon Ave 1 Cailorrdn Strad Sewer,6.13(2) /,080,000 35,000 110,000 915.000 1,025,000 1,025.000 3.Wd"V d MW thru Coate Mean 100.000 100.000 10Q000 4.Mlfaela"M a pro" 250,000 25.000 25.000 25.OW 25,N09 25,000 125,000 125,000 250.OW 5.Pump station kr pmvem ft.2.37"8%) 239.200 2.2W 3e.0W 38.000 64.000 $1,000 237.000 237.OW SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSJRELIABILITY 1.928,200 65.200 392,000 1,004.000 109,000 108,000 25,000 1,8W8,000 225,000 1,981,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 10.746,200 2.842,7W 479.500 2,089,000 1.934.000 1,771,000 1,425,000 7.678,500 225,000 7.903:500 • PoseOy hnded by DbMd No.8 Partla0y tended by DbMd No.7 1.MASTER-PIANNED FACULTIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION «• Partialy honied by Other Dlatrlda 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 3.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 7 Schedule of DWet Coifectfon System PFO"- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F O N 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST RED EST REO EST REG EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PL RC OASES 1997-96 1996-99 19tt9-2000 200"1 200M YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSfINCREASE 1,Orerge Park Acres Tnnk Replacement 7-17(2) e21.000 37.OW 50.000 OW.000 134.000 M.Om 794.000 24ustin Air Base Facilities (3) 5.750.000 150.000 2.000,000 3,000.000 5W.000 100,000 • 5.750,000 5.750,0W 3.North Trunk Replacement(3) 2.850.000 50.0W 1.400,O00 1,D00.000 2.450,0W 2W.000 2.8K= 4. Gisler-Red Fit Interceptor(3) 5.300,OOD 300,DW 300.D00 6,000,000 5,300.0W 5.Red M Interceptor Pandial(3) 1.400,000 1,400,0W 1.400.0W 6.Lemon Hoods Sewer Reptacemen, 7-22-112 M 5.414,000 1.864.0W SRI.= 2A00.000 2.550.000 1.000.0m 3,5W.000 7.Bromwkwp TnrA ReplaoneM(3) 850,000 850.000 85Q000 B.Co0epe Ave PS Parallel Force Maim?-23-1(951L) 1.405,0W 27.0W 143,000 1.235.000 1.378,000 1,379,000 9.Improvements to Main St.P.S..7-7.1(28%)•(2) 987,000 217.000 650.000 100,000 750.000 750.000 10.Main St.Puny Station EVanslom.7-7-2(28%)-(3) 775.000 775.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEME14T84NCREASE CAP. 25.332.OW 2.145.0W 993,000 3.935.000 3.484,000 2,450,WD 3.100.000 13.982.000 e.45O,if00 22 412.1f00 175,000 CAPITAL 84PROVEMM 1.Purnp Station MprovemeNs.2.37 (33%)" (3) 1.315.200 12.200 198.0m 198.000 4e2,000 445,000 1.303.000 1=1.000 2.Pump Station Abandonment T-%3 (3) 425.000 75.000 2W.000 150.000 425.000 425.000 3.Mlscelanma Projects 500.000 50,OW 50.000 50.000 $0,000 50,000 250.OW 250,000 500.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABIUTY 2.240.200 12.200 248.0001 323.0001 712.00p 1 645,O00 60,000 1,111e.000 2WO00 2.228,000 I.sumum Mwtx*Rahab.7-21 MM)"(3) 30e.000 two 70.000 155.000 so tioo 305,000 3o5.O00 2.Mleoelaneoua Rap*of Local Sewers (4) 5.800,DW 100.0m 1.2W.OW 1.200.OW 1.200.WD 1,200.000 4.900.000 700.111010 6.WD.WD SUB-TOTAL REPABILITATION PROJECTS 5.90e.000 I 1.000 IM.000 1,270.WO 1.365.000 1.250,000 1.200,000 I 6XISA00 700,000 SAOSA00 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL UMPROYEMENTS 33.478.200 2.158.200 1.341.OW 5.528.WO 5.5e1.000 1 4,345.00p 4,3WAW 21.145.OW 9.4DOA00 1 30.645.000 T76A0p • Parialy dswded by Dbmd No.14 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION ••Partiely Mewled by DlsM No.1 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN -Partialy howled by Dbblct No.8 3.MASTER-PLAK ED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION «..PaAlay Arrwded by ghor Dqy� 4.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE WASTER-PLAN DESIGN i CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 11 Schedule of Dbtdct Collection System Pml"_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C 0 E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST REO EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 1996-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2W2-200T YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT84NCREASE CAPACITY 1.Slater Ave.Pump Station Roo..11.17-1(1)•(87.0%) 41.520.000 0.450.000 70.000 70,000 70.000 2.Golds kv at St Sewer Replacwnwd.11-17.2 (1) 2.730.000 4J,000 135.000 500,000 2.000.000 50.000 2,885,000 X685,000 3.Slater Ave.Re11M 12) 1.7011.000 - 1,700,000 1.700.000 4.Hall Interceptor(21 3.150.000 150,000 3,000,000 3.150.0139 3.150.000 5.Slaw/Sprtnpdde Replavwmwd(2) eoo.000 WOOD soo,000 e.Warner Ave Sewer Re9e1(2) 1.500.000 1J)00.000 1.600.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 18.4W.000 0,495.000 205.0001 500,000 1 2,000.0001 200,000 3,000.000 5.905,000 4.OW.000 9.905.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIBEL!ABILrTY 1.Hun"on Beach Purchase ADad,11-10(2) 325,000 75,000 250.000 325,000 325.000 2.Pump Stallon Improvement.2a7(9%)"m 350.300 3,300 54,000 54.000 120.000 121,000 355.000 355.OW 3.Mtac llanwn PloJeda 909.000 00 150.000 50.0 50,000 50.000 50.000 350.000 25MWO e130,0w SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABIUTY 1,283.3001 3.300 279,000 354.000 178.000 171.000 50.000 1.030.000 25Q000 1.280.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 17.683.300 8.498.300 484,000 854.000 2.178.000 371,000 3.050.000 8,935,000 41.250.0w 11.155.000 • Powly hodW M Obtrld No.3 ..Partially horded by Other Districts 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 14 Schedule of District Collection System Projoitt - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C 0 E F 0 H I J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997.98 19W99 1999.2000 200"1 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASEOAPACITY 1.kromvements 10 Main St.P.S.,7-7-1(72%)-(0 2,120,000 195,000 1,673,000 250.000 1,025,000 1.025.000 2.Mein Street Pump Station Eqw slon,7-7-2(72%)"(2) 2,000.000 2,000.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 1 4.120.0001 195.0001 1.675.0001 250,0001 1 1 1.925.000 .1,925,000 ILOW o00 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRIWAINUrr 1.Mbodummm projects 250,000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 125.000 125.000 250AW SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMEWSIRELIABILITY 250.000 25,000 25.000 25,000 25.000 25.000 125,000 125.000 250AN GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 4.370.000 195,000 I I,T00000 1 275A00 1 25000 1 25.000 1 25.000 2.050.0001 125.0081 2,110.000 2,000000 • P&OMI hnded by 01*1d No.? ~Future eonstnmam near 2020.psr8eht haled by 0.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED NE0 FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION RESOLUTION NO. 97-33-14 INITIATING PROPOSAL TO CONSOLIDATE DISTRICTS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 14 APPLYING TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 56000, ET SEQ. WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts were originally formed and organized in 1947-48 as separate districts providing sewer services, generally following the drainage patterns of Orange County; and, WHEREAS, Orange County's sewer system is now well-established, and the current main focus of the nine districts is on joint projects and the attendant regulatory issues; and, WHEREAS, over the years, the continuation of the nine districts as separate entities has contributed to certain administrative and financial burdens; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Part 3 of Division 3 of Title 5 of the Government Code, known as the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 ("the Act"), certain local agencies may make request to the Local Agency Formation Commission for a change of organization or a reorganization; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 14 is a local agency authorized to make such a proposal; and, l� WHEREAS, "consolidation" is one type of change of organization or reorganization permitted by the Act, defined as the uniting or joining of two or more districts, formed pursuant to the same principal act, into a single new successor district; and, WHEREAS, notice of intent to adopt this resolution of application has not been given to each interested and each subject agency as is permitted, but not required by Government Code Section 56800(b); and, WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be consolidated is inhabited; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of streamlining administration and Board procedures, maintaining financial and other records, and reducing costs, it has been determined by the District that the proposed consolidation will effect substantial administrative benefits and financial savings, both individually and collectively. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: This proposal for a change of organization is made pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 2: The change of organization proposed herein is the consolidation of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 into a single County Sanitation District, pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. ° Section 3: The boundaries of the affected nine districts are as depicted in Exhibit "A", attached. The boundaries of the proposed consolidated district are as depicted in Exhibit "B", attached. Section 4: Terms and conditions of the proposed consolidation regarding consolidation of assets and financial obligations are set forth on Exhibit "C", attached. Section 5: The number and method of selection of members of the governing Board shall be as provided in California Government Code Section 4730.65. Section 6: The following person is to be furnished with copies of the report by the Executive Officer and to be given mailed notice of the hearing on the proposal: Donald F. McIntyre General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Section 7: This proposal is to be considered a formal request that proceedings for consolidation be taken pursuant to Part 3 of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. Section 8: A plan for providing services within the affected territory is attached as Exhibit "D". Section 9: The effective date of the consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 24, 1997. H:\wp.dta\admin\BS\RES\RES97\97-33-14.doc STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ti )SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, PENNY KYLE, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97-33-14 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board on the 24th day of September, 1997, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Thomas R. Saltarelli, Chair pro tem; William G. Steiner; Peer A. Swan NOES: None ABSENT: Mark A. Murphy; Christina Shea IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, this 24th day of September, 1997. Penny Kyle, c e Board of DiZllors County Sartiifat�c�n District No. 14 of Orange,County, California HAwp.dta\admin\BST0RMS\97T13.033.14.doc _ , - EXHIBIT A—Map of Current Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 3, WNTTIeR Ewo p,9 q�'eF LA HABRA qti 9 LAMEERr AD CCCC~9•To IMPERIAL HWV , �Gti �c B EA CG,b oASTANCHURT AD L RTON VOREA UNDA ELVD YORBA �3 MALVERN CHAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA I 9�, �� I ORAi ETNO AVE �1 p0J I I I L. LA U E'6 C? PALM UW=LNAAVEIK O g ANAHEIM ; VILLA dO �o "LLAD CYPRESS I W TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON 3 LAMITOS O i" RAZE > Y - CHAIRMAN AVE 2 m S 7 GARDEN GRO S sTMI�ISTE WESTMImmR IAVE trim ST 7 B � O W D < us 1 SANT W - ANA WARNER AVE J 8 FQUNTA : E1US AVE IIIALLEY P I I I HUN IN 4N 0 ADAMS AVE O PACIFIC AMITON AV@ COST OCEAN MESA iRViNE 5 NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 EXHIBIT B— Map of Proposed Boundaries of County Sanitation District Nos. 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 • LOS ANGELES COUNTY S wNIrnER Ew0 LA HABRA �� �tiC 9tiq LAMBERT RD i IY►ERIA�NV/Y G B EA c0, EASTA NURM PO �� �'CABA UNOA SLVO L ON►u`veRN YORBA CHAPMA14AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� 9� ORAI ETNO AVe ,O o I `may LA UE A PALM UNmWAAv K ` > g (( Ii ANAHEIM o VILLA rC eAu Ro I CYPRESS f W U AVE PARK LOS W STANTON m Q RAN E %LAMITOS <' e.F : - W c s > x " CNA►YAN AVB SI » 0 GARDEN tt� GRO S STMINS WESTNSTERI�VE ,TTI Sr I c MI I 1 B < W u < TUS F > ►•C I EN Sr ''R•'a'P g SANT _ W O ANA WARNER Ave 1 � 8 F UNTA 1 EIUS AVeVALLEY HUN IN N ADAW A ht .PACIFIC AWLTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE ' NEWPORT BEACH N N 1 O•IA W WIAI SRVM-CLR.COR CSDOC 1/95 Exhibit C LAFCO Application Terms & Conditions Consolidation of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1. The nine separate districts known jointly as the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ("CSDOC") shall be consolidated into one single county sanitation district pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code Sections 4730 et seq.) and shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County ("District"). [G.C. §56844(v)] (As used herein, "CSDOC" refers to the nine Districts, both jointly, singly and in any combination.) 2. As a result of consolidating, the nine existing districts shall be dissolved and be reorganized as one consolidated District with one consolidated Board of Directors under California Health & Safety Code Section 4730.65. At the time of consolidation, the Board of Directors would include representatives from the following jurisdictions: [G.C. §56844(n)] • County (1) - County of Orange Unincorporated Area • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Santa Ana Buena Park La Habra Seal Beach Cypress La Palma Stanton Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Tustin Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District 3. Directors of District shall be compensated in accordance with applicable state law. Pagel 4. All system facilities shall be transferred from existing CSDOC to District as of the effective date of consolidation in an "as-is" condition, without any payment or repair obligation from CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(k)(v)] 5. All lands, buildings, real and personal property, assets and appurtenances held by CSDOC, as of the effective date of the consolidation, shall be transferred to District. Such assets are enumerated in the CSDOC Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ending June 30, 1997. [G.G. §56844(b)] 6. District shall be designated as the successor to CSDOC and retain all of the rights, duties and obligations of the former CSDOC with respect to enforcement, performance or payment of any outstanding bonds, contracts or obligations of the former CSDOC. [G.C. §56844(m)] 7. All previously authorized charges, fees assessments and/or taxes currently in effect by CSDOC shall be continued by District. [G.C. §56844(t)] 8. The establishment of Special Zones within District, pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 4850 et seq., shall be effected on July 1, 1998 and shall collectively include any or all portions of the entire CSDOC service area and individually include the specified areas as shown on the nine attached maps. The existing rate schedules within each of the Special Zones shall continue as presently in effect by each District within CSDOC until such time as amended by the District's Board of Directors. The annual sewer service charge can only be amended by a vote of two-thirds of all members of the governing body. [G.C. §56844(e)] 9. All agreements by and between any two or more existing CSDOC's, including but not limited to: joint sewer ownership or use, construction or maintenance of facilities, shall be terminated upon the effective date of the consolidation. The termination of the agreements is appropriate in recognition of the new District assuming full and exclusive ownership and authority over all rights, duties and obligations of all existing CSDOC's. 10. To the extent not inconsistent with the terms of the consolidation, and as necessary to carry out the original intent, all contracts between the Irvine Ranch Water District and one or more existing CSDOC's, including those relating to ownership of capacity rights in treatment, disposal and sewer facilities, shall be assigned to District and remain in full force and effect. All contracts between County Sanitation District No. 14 and one or more Page 2 CSDOC's shall also be assigned to the new District and remain in full force and effect. 11. CSDOC shall transfer any and all indebtedness and the obligation to levy taxes, charges, assessments, or fees in order to make payment of said indebtedness to District. [G.C. §56844(c)] 12. CSDOC shall file a statement with LAFCO that the reorganization shall not adversely affect or impair the status of any employee of CSDOC or District. As of the effective date of this reorganization, all employees of CSDOC shall become employees of District. Rates of pay, accrued vacation and sick leave, vacation and sick leave accrual rates, employee rights, insurance, retirement benefits, and all other benefits and programs shall be transferred over to District at then-current levels. Memoranda of Understanding in place under CSDOC shall be transferred to the new District. [G.C. §56844(1)] 13. Permits issued to CSDOC by any federal, state or local regulatory authority, shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties as contained within the permits and to continue operations without interruption. Such permits shall include but not be limited to: CSDOC's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit, including a waiver for full secondary treatment pursuant to Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act, and all other air and land permits. [G.C. §56844(v)] 14. Permits issued by CSDOC shall be transferred and assigned in full force and effect to District. District shall be authorized to assume all rights, responsibilities and duties contained in said permits and in the laws authorizing the issuance of said permits. Such permits shall include but not be limited to Sewer Connection Permits and Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permits. [G.C. §56844(c)] 15. District shall assume all existing contracts and obligations presently in full force and effect with CSDOC and which have not otherwise been specifically referenced herein. [G.C. §56844(m)] 16. The effective date of this consolidation shall be July 1, 1998. [G.C. §56844(p)] Page 3 Map of Special Zone 1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY s, wNlrneR ELvO '94, LA HABRA o9q�l•ne�'9.{. LAMBERT RD 4 C`C 990w- IMPERIAL HV" B EA BASTA NUIIV VOREA LINDA ELVD L ON MALVERN YORBA 13 CHA►MAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA � 9 .�1 ORA ETNOWZ AVE i 2 s�O� OJ wG UE 4A �v LA PAF K PALMA LIN C7 1 ANAHEIM c VILLA O Nw BALL RD CY RESS ! TA vE PARK LOS STANTON 8 LAMITOS RANGE s 3 p m m W O a <C S Y N CMA►MAN AV S y —GARD N GRO STMI S SE WESTMINSTER OWE f T US 14 W g na >< J 8 F U NTA 1 E us AVE ALLEY �a HUN IN N �� AC ADAMS A 4 O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE O5 g~ ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 2 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, wNmneR BwD 0,9 R'yecc LA HABRA e9 gticn 9,Iq LAMBERT AD " l •' IMPERIAL NWV >3 EX.., L ON lGRaA LwDA ewn MALVERN YORBA 13 "Ark"m AVE f.ACENTIA LIN.DA OM ETNO AVE OJ c0 �G UE A ., LA p PALM PAK uN > .::. ..:::.:.:: . 5 ANAHEIM 0 E aAu Ro CY R S LOS STANTON LAMITOS _ P- W = r CNAPMAN AVH �� ;.;BARD.......... �.... jft STMI S SE wesT4SNsrEA VE Im ST IC 7 B 52 W O Tus MCP DEN Sr '9L�ry 11 SANT g W m ANA WARNER AVE 8 F UNTA o 1 E US AVE ALLEY �C HUN NGT N ADAMS AVI �' gr O PACIFIC LTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE P g 5 g` ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS GNAW Y{!1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 3 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, LA wNimsRHABR BLvoA' B >iAMesxr Rc> FC 90/ �IYVeRfAC.NwY � OC/ B EA BASTAN NURY W.NiBA LINDA BLVO O w�LVEnN .. t GN YORBA _ CNAP/MN AVE LACENTIA LINDA �2� L� oiw eTrw ave 2 GOJ c0 LA uE A PA' K i .. ANAHEtM W VILLA O AVE PARK m EAMRID o RAN o E GARD tl y� J GRID ST1II[I SE - ,Tn,sr s w�sr�,ursiEx vc:: B ' 7 V 1 O TUS MC A DCEN Sr SANT ANA WARNER AVE O e AVE hLLEY ° P C, �C 4Jytr• FgOA 4 �ADAM6�11N .. 9 O PACIFIC AMILTONAVG COST OCEAN MESA ,° IRVINE O � ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �Y or rw OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 J Map of Special Zone 5 LOS ANGELES COUNTY wtrMER BLVD B LA HABRA d 9gti F9 LAMBERT RD IMPERIAL HWY B EA BASTAN NURY L ON YORISA LINDA BLVD MALVERN YORBA 13 ONAPMAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'b� � 9s GOJ�1 ORA ETNO AVE I 2 'O�o LA PALMA UNC PA K Og ANAHEIM W VILLA 40 �, BALL RD CY RE S I O TA VIE PARK LOS STANTON m LAMITOS a RAN .E 3 > � � CNAPMAN AVE 2 m o �� GAR D N GRO STMI S SE wEST19NSTER VE ,TTN SIT 8 s u < O TUS � m O MD F DMN ST 11 SANT �' 14 W m ANA WARNER AVE J , 8 F UNTA El US AVE ALLEY `� � iti�c��r�90 4e�r• HUN INGfT4fN ADAMS AVG9 gr O PACIFIC COST OCEAN MESA �,° '''`````''`'<' IRVINE P e NEWPORT N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 6 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, wNIrnER BwD 0,9'4�e� LA HABRA gtic '9.yq LAMBERT RD F 9 IMPERIAL NWY CO(�ti O,�00 B EA BASTANENURY RD YORBA LINDA BLVD O MALVERN L ON YORBA 13 CNA►MAN AVE LINDA LACENTIA 9s �. ORA ETNO AVE i 2 /Q� OJ , C UE A ��, LA PALM um PA K Oc, ANAHEIM c VILLA rD v BALLRD CY RE S I r vE PARK LOS W STANTON o 9 RAN E OLAM{TOS o m S > Y a C14A►MAN AV a GAR D N GRO STMI S S` WESTMINSTI.R VE tT7115T C 8 QTUS � MC F DDEN ST 11 g SANT 14 W s ANA WARNER AVE 8 MUNTAhr 1 E VS AVE ALLEY HUN)ING T4N ADAMS AVE cc G gr V PACIFIC AMILrONAVE � T. OCEAN IRVINE 5 5 'Pti , NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 7 LOS ANGELES COUNTY S, WNIrnER111110 LA HABRA ��qti 9F9� LAMBERT RO C�C q90 IMPERIAL HWY VV O� �wO ti B EA � coGMl- BASTA NURY L ON YORBA LINOA BLVD MALVERN YORBA 13 CNA►MAN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'L� ORA ETNO AVE I R<1 �G LA UE A Cod p' PALM UN PAYEIK I > og� vEI ANAHEIM a VILLA 40 eAURo CY RE S TA VE PARK LOS STANTON 3 LAMITOS O o RAN E W < S > Y m CNAPMAN AVE 2 GAR D N oe g � GRO STMI S SE WESTMINSTER AVE 177N aT 3 m F = MC R DOEN ST O1 ; SANT W m ANA WARNER AVE UNTA ALLEY 1 E SAVE i r ti HUN NG N EA A DMA MAS A 6 gr O PACIFIC AMILTON AVE COST OCEAN MESA ��° IRVINE O5 NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS y �Aa..•. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 11 LOS ANGELES COUNTY 0 LA HABRA uMSERT RD IMPERIAL HWV VVV QG �'YO B EA " cOG BASTA NUM L ON wRSA UNDA BLVD WLVERN YORBA @ CNAPAMN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9'b� ORA ETNO AVE C UE A ., LA PALM UN PA K UAu RD CY RE SANAHEIM a VILLA 40 TA VE PARK LOS STANTON g LAMITOS O s RAN F E gm 5 > Y 0 CHAPMAN AV S m �+ GRO N S STMI S WESTIANSTER VE /TTN ST B 7 W MC F DEN ST SANT ANA WARNER AVE O E S AVE ALLEY HQN: :.N. N Fqa ?i ADAMS AVE �+ H O PACIFIC ""! "'."v COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE O5 g~ ' NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 13 LOS ANGELES COUNTY WMITTIERBLVD Q' q.re LA HABRA LAMBERT AD vl, 99 w- IMPERIAL NWr OGy,'YO B EA BASTAN NURY RD L ON YORSA LINDA BLVD MALVERN YORBA13 CHAPMAN AVE IIIII ACENTIA LINDA 2 OMNOETMO AVE O J 2 O G C. 5 UE A LA � PA K PALM U LN AVE j 5 ANAHEIM ; VILLA O `` �O BALL RD CY RE S I AYE PARK LOS STANTON ; LAMITOS m RAN E ` 3 0 > Y e CHA►MAN AV o A GAR D N GRO STMI S SE wESTMINSTER MVE 17TM ST B UW u < O� TUS MCP DEN Sr 11 g SANT �' 14 W ANA wARNER AVE 8 F DUNTNAho 1 E US AVE ALLEY 4J, � iti�c�ryl��o ` Y• HUN INGT N EACH ADAMS AVS9 g O PACIFIC AIALTONAVE COST OCEAN MESA IRVINE 5 NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ° °°ALL W rus OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Map of Special Zone 14 LOS ANGELES COUNTY s, wNITTIER BLVD q� LA HABRA LAMBERT RD IMPERIAL HWY B EA BASTA NURY L ON YORBA LINDA BLVD A 1A+< MALVERN YORBA C MAPMIIN AVE LACENTIA LINDA 9 GOJ 45 ORANGETNO AVE j A U E A j L. �., LA I F� c� PALM LINd�LNAVE1 05� I ANAHEIM VILLA dD BALL RD CY RE S j W TA AVE PARK LOS STANTON LAMITOS o z O $ RAN E ti, g > Y e CNA PMAN AVB 2 y { a b o v GARD N GRO STM I S S WESTMINSTER IAVE 17TN 5T U W 2 f u < 1 TU � e O S � MC FADDEN ST � 2 11 g SANT O m ANA w WARNER AVE J r 8 F s UNTA I VAL LEY 1 ElU4 AVE � I ?%i' i<'.2:y: '�'?[ %` i2?iE `'i?2'i'?`� HUN ING Ti IN A DAMS AVIJ O6 ........ ...... .. PACIF IC TON AV AMI L E COST i Eii..... OCEAN MESA J° IRVINE r v Q' P~ Or NEWPORT BEACH N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS itlA a rw OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1989 SRVM-CLR.CDR CSDOC 1/95 Exhibit D Plan of Services for the Consolidation of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County INTRODUCTION This Plan of Services has been prepared pursuant to Government Code Section 56653, which requires that a plan for providing services within the affected territory be provided whenever an application for a change of organization is submitted to LAFCO. This document will facilitate the consolidation of the nine (9) existing County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) into one single County Sanitation District pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq. The resulting consolidated agency shall be named the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County (District). This consolidation proposes a transfer of all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of CSDOC to the District. The Plan of Services provides a description of CSDOC and its operations and how they will be consolidated as the District. J.L DESCRIPTION OF CSDOC A. General Information The CSDOC is made up of nine independent special districts. Each district is a political subdivision of the State of California and is governed by a representative of each city and sanitary district within the district and, if the District includes unincorporated territory, a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Each district has its own budget. All districts except District Nos. 13 and 14 have their own tax rate and trunk sewer systems. District No. 13 buys capacity in the other districts' transmission facilities. A Joint Administrative Organization was formed in 1948 to administer the business of the jointly owned treatment and disposal facilities and the activities common to all districts. This is provided for in a Joint Ownership Operation and Construction Agreement. The day-to-day operation of the organization is under the direction of a General Manager, one assistant general manager, eight department heads, for an authorized staff of 560 full time equivalents for the Fiscal Year 1997-98. B. Types of Services, Level, and Range of Service Currently Provided The CSDOC is a single-purpose public entity formed solely for the collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater and its residuals and serves the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal needs of approximately 2.2 million people. During 1996-1997, an average daily sewage influent flow of 244 million gallons per day (MGD) was treated and 510 wet tons per day of residual solids (biosolids) was produced. CSDOC encompasses a 470 square-mile area of Orange County that includes 23 of the County's 31 cities. CSDOC operates the third largest wastewater management agency of its kind west of the Mississippi,with assets valued at more than $1 billion dollars. The nine individual districts own about 650 miles of major trunk sewers, 22 pumping stations and two major treatment plants with disposal facilities to safely discharge the treated effluent through an ocean outfall into deep ocean waters. The treatment plants process an average of 244 million gallons of wastewater per day. Page 1 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D ' Plan of Service Reclamation Plant No. 1 is located in Fountain Valley. It has a current,operational primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 108 MGD and a secondary treatment capacity of 66 MGD currently being expanded to 80 MGD. Treatment Plant No. 2 is in Huntington Beach. It has a primary treatment capacity, including standby, of 186 MGD. Plant No. 2 provides advanced primary treatment to all of the wastewater that enters the plant and secondary treatment to up to 90 MGD of the total flow. Table 1 highlights the service area characteristics and system features. Table 1 Service Area Joint Works Facilities -As of June 30, 1997 Total Population Served (estimated) 2,275,000 Service Area (estimated) 470 square miles Total Number of Cities Served 23 Total Miles of Trunk Sewers 650 Number of Pumping Stations 22 Number of Treatment Plants 2 Primary Treatment Capacity (includes standby) Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 Total Primary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 MGD Secondary Treatment Capacity Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 Total Secondary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . 156 MGD Total Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450 MGD Reported Average Daily Flow Plant No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 MGD Plant No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 MGD Total Average Daily Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 MGD Page 2 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service C. Description of Sanitary Sewer System CSDOC processes wastewater from the collection systems of the various cities, water districts and local sewer agencies. They do not deal directly with individual customers except for portions of District No. 7, which is located primarily in unincorporated territory of the County near Tustin. CSDOC's assets consist of individual district assets and each district's respective share of jointly owned assets. Table 2 summarizes the respective District ownership in jointly owned and separately owned property, plant, equipment and construction in progress, at cost, as of June 30, 1997: Table 2 District Ownership Jointly Owned Separately Owned Total Total property, plant and equipment $804,200,000 $321,300,000 $1,135,500,000 Less accumulated $310,200.000 depreciation Net property, plant and equipment $825,300,000 D. Additional Assets In addition to its real property and facilities, CSDOC owns service vehicles, equipment, tools, repair parts inventory, and communications and office equipment. CSDOC maintains cash, liquid securities to meet its cash flow requirements, and other reserves. The following table summarizes the districts' reserves budgeted for the end of Fiscal Year 1996-97. Table 3 Reserves Analysis "Dry Period" Operating Cash Flow $28,021,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,221,000 Debt Service Reserves Fund Balance 59,724,000 Capital Reserves 49,233,000 Environmental Requirements Reserves 4,484,000 Flood/Earthquake Insurance Reserves 81,450,000 Rate Stabilization Funds 141,200,000 Total $375,333,000 Page 3 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D ' Plan of Service E. Liabilities As of June 30, 1997, CSDOC liabilities included debt in the amount of approximately $397,575,000. These issues include $397,45,000 of Certificates of Participation (COP) and $30,000 of general obligation (G.O.) bonds. The Districts have maintained their AA- rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and Aa rating from Moody's Investor Services, although all COP issues are backed by issuance of letters of credit and are rated AAA. The Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget provides for$32,620,000 to service the debt on the various COPs issued. In addition, there is a $15,000 annual payment to maturity in January 1999 for the G.O. bonds in District No. 1 1. Consolidation of the districts will have no impact on the liabilities of CSDOC. Under consolidation into a single County Sanitation District, the new County Sanitation District assessments all predecessor district obligations. Further, the districts are presently joined by agreement to manage and fund liabilities. The new consolidated District will establish special zones upon consolidation to continue differential user fees and to ensure that predecessor districts' outstanding debt is serviced by only those residents who originally assumed that debt. The boundaries of each zone will be the same as those of each predecessor district. The new consolidated District will establish nine (9) zones to differentiate and account for costs, revenues and liabilities of the existing districts. In addition, an Improvement District (ID) could be formed coincident with each predecessor district's service area to enable proper segregated accounting for the retirement of the existing Certificates of Participation (COPs) debt. As new future borrowing may occur, new ID's would be formed to include the service area benefiting from the projects. Such new ID's would not necessarily have boundaries congruent with the zones. For projects at the treatment plants, however, an ID to include all of the new District's service area could be formed to properly allocate the cost of such improvements that would benefit all the zones. It is also expected that the consolidated District would continue the practice of dedicating Ad Valorem Taxes where it would be collectable within a zone to the retirement of long-term debt of an appropriate ID. F. Management and Employees CSDOC presently operates in a consolidated fashion pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code Section 4840 et seq. CSDOC currently employs approximately 560 full-time employees. Legal Services are provided by the law firm of Woodruff, Spradlin and Smart auditing services are also provided by contract. In addition, various other services are contracted-out. These include such varied services as groundskeeping, environmental review, ocean research and reporting, etc. CSDOC's organization chart is included in CSDOC's Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget which is submitted along with this application. The existing net joint operation budget for Fiscal Year 1997-98 is $46,922,650. Consolidation of the districts into a single District would result in the continuation of management and operational structures and functional expenditures similar to those described above. Operations of the new District would remain the same as the current operations of CSDOC. Consequently, there would be no change in employee compensation and employee benefits as adjustments would not be required. The transition from the existing joint operation to a single District operation would have no impact on employees, their occupational status, or their benefits. i Page 4 i CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service G. Rates and Charges Each district, except District No. 14, has an adopted Sanitary Sewer Service Fee to provide funding for operating the sewer systems in accordance with the Clean Water Act and CSDOC's Revenue Program. District No. 14 is funded through the payment of an annual charge by the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) directly to CSDOC. IRWD levies and collects individual user charges from each parcel receiving service. Sanitary Sewer Service Fees are set annually by each district after a review of projected needs. In May, 1997, The Board of Directors adopted a user rate increase fee schedule that provides for gradual rate increase over the next five years for six of the nine districts. This represents that first user rate increase in seven years. The Districts have been able to avoid user fee increases by reducing operational costs through reorganizing and streamlining Districts operations, holding vacant positions open, and deferring new facilities. However, because the Districts' capital improvement program's debt service obligations continued to increase beyond the level of its primary funding source, i.e. property tax revenues, and because of the additional capital improvement requirements, increase in user fees became inevitable. The following is the adopted Annual Sewer Service Fee Rate Schedule District 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 1 $91.36 $100.27 $110.04 $120.77 $132.55 2 $73.00 $75.00 $77.00 $80.00 $82.00 3 $75.00 $76.00 $77.00 $78.00 $80.00 5 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 $96.75 6 $78.00 $80.00 $82.00 $84.00 $86.00 7 $55.00 $60.00 $66.00 $73.00 $80.00 11 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 $101.25 $113.91 13 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 As was indicated previously, establishment of special zones upon consolidation would continue the existing schedules of differential Sanitary Sewer Service Fees until such time as amended by action of the governing body. Said fees shall not be amended without a two- thirds vote of all members of the governing body. Consolidation is expected to facilitate reorganizing and streamlining the new District's operations. H. Summary of Revenues and Expenses The CSDOC Fiscal Year 1997-98 Budget, which is included in this application package, contains detailed information regarding revenues and expenses. Attention is called to Section 3, pages 1-13, of the Budget document for summary information. III. DESCRIPTION OF THE CONSOLIDATED DISTRICT A. General Page 5 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D ' Plan of Service The nine independent County Sanitation Districts currently collectively known as CSDOC, and which utilize joint operating,working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, will be consolidated into a single County Sanitation District pursuant to the California County Sanitation District Act(Health and Safety Code Section 4700 et seq.). The boundaries of the consolidated District will be the same as the outer boundaries of those nine predecessor districts. B. Types of Services, Level and Range of Services The new District will assume all duties, responsibilities and liabilities of the former CSDOC. The District will own and operate the wastewater treatment system which provides sewage collection, treatment and disposal services currently owned and operated by the nine (9) Sanitation Districts known jointly as CSDOC. C. District Structure The District' s organization will be the same as that structure which presently exists under the CSDOC joint operating agreement for the operation and administration of the joint facilities. D. Governing Board Composition The new District will be formed under California Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65. Under Health and Safety Code Section 4730.65, the governing body of the consolidated District would be made up of a 25-member board representing local cities, sanitary districts and the County of Orange unincorporated area. Board membership would decrease from 29 to 25 with the loss of double representation for the Cities of Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Yorba Linda and the County of Orange. The proposed governing Board formed under Section 4730.65 would include the following agencies: • Cities (21) Anaheim Huntington Beach Placentia Brea Irvine Tustin Buena Park La Habra Santa Ana Cypress La Palma Seal Beach Fountain Valley Los Alamitos Stanton Fullerton Newport Beach Villa Park Garden Grove Orange Yorba Linda • Sanitary Districts (2) Costa Mesa Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District I • Water District (1) - Irvine Ranch Water District County (1) -County of Orange (to represent the Unincorporated Areas) I Page 6 CSDOC Consolidation Application to LAFCO Exhibit D Plan of Service E. Three Year Budget of the Consolidated District It is anticipated that revenues and expenditures which would have been budgeted by CSDOC for the operation and administration of joint facilities and the construction of capital improvements will be the basis for the new District's financial plan. Attachment A is a 3-year projection of the District's budget under consolidation. The projection covers Fiscal Years 1998-99, 1999-2000 and 2000-2001. Attachment B is a summary of anticipated capital improvements for the new District. This summary of capital needs was derived from CSDOC's Joint Works Capital Improvements Budget. IV IMPACTS ON CUSTOMERS There will be no negative financial impact on customers. No rate changes are anticipated as a result of the consolidation. Please refer to previous discussion regarding the formation of special zones. V. IMPACTS ON OTHER JURISDICTIONS There will be no service level impacts on any of the cities, sanitary districts, and other agencies presently relying on services provided by CSDOC as the services responsibilities, without modification, will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Effective date is proposed as July 1, 1998. Vi. IMPACTS ON REGIONAL PARTICIPATION All CSDOC's contractual obligations will transfer to the new District upon the effective date of consolidation. Accordingly, there are no anticipated impacts. Page 7 915/97 Consolidated Sanitation Distrct of Orange County Proiected Budgets Fiscal Years 1998-99 Thru 2000-01 1998-1999 1999-2000 002 0-2001 Revenues Industrial/Commercial Use Fees $ 9,317,000 $ 10,714,000 $ 12,322,000 Sewer Service Fees 65,938,000 68,907,000 72,436,000 Fees From Other Agencies 6,150,000 4,700,000 5,250,000 Connection Fees 6,784,000 8,065,000 9,727,000 Interest 22,443,000 22,420,000 21,749,000 Miscellaneous &Other 2,640,500 4,141,500 4,141,500 Property Taxes 30,572,000 30,565,000 30,562,000 New COP Issues 53,200,000 57,000,000 62,400,000 Total Revenues $ 197,044,500 $ 206,512,500 $ 218,567,500 Requirements Collection System O&M Expenses $ 9,553,000 $ 10,804,000 $ 10,527,000 Treatment System O&M Expenses 47,861,000 48,618,000 49,794,000 Collection System Improvements 20,997,000 24,902,000 26,497,000 Treatment System Improvements 70,086,000 78,429,500 96,380,500 GO Bond Principal&Interest 16,000 16,000 - Costs of New COP Issuance 2,660,000 2,850,000 3,120,000 COP Service& Retirement 37,772,000 42,590,000 47,834,000 Total Expenses $ 188,945,000 $ 208,409,500 $ 234,152,500 Revenue Exceeding Expenses $ 8,099,500 $ (1,897,000) $ (15,565,000) Beginning Cash Balances 385,031,450 393,130,950 391,233,950 Ending Cash Balances $ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375,668,950 Appropriations, Dedications & Reserves "Dry Period" Operating Cash Flow $ 28,800,000 $ 30,121,000 $ 30,737,000 Operating Contingency Reserve 11,483,000 11,925,000 12,064,000 Capital Projects Completion 49,995,000 49,946,200 49,540,100 Environmental Requirements Reserve 4,634,000 4,484,000 4,484,000 Required Debt&COP Service Reserves 38,359,000 41,133,000 44,230,000 "Dry Period"COP Service Cash Flow 27,705,350 31,244,600 35,022,350 Property&Uabiliity Catastrophe Reserve 89,752,850 90,971,850 91,208,250 Rate Stabilization Funds 142,401,750 131,408,300 108,383,250 •$ 393,130,950 $ 391,233,950 $ 375.668,950 Unappropriated Cash & Investment Balances $ - $ - $ - County Sanitation District No. 1 Be,Mdub of 0bMd Collxtlon Sydf1 n Pr444ft CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C 0 E F G H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST RED EST REG EST RED FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1097.06 1owell 1OW20M 2000-01 2001.02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2001 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIA81LfIY 1.§Mwd neoue Pro" 250.000 25.000 25.000 23.000 25J100 25.000 125.000 125.000 250.000 'SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 250.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 125.000 125.000 250.000 REHABILITATION PROJECTS 1.Santa AM Trunk Sewer Rehab.(1) 6.300.000 75.000 T5.000 0.225.000 0.300.000 2.Sunflower Manhde Rehab.(1)7-21•(3011) 140.000 30.000 00.000 30.000 140.000 140,000 3.Dyer Road Manhole Rehab.(1) 350.000 50.000 200.000 100.000 350,000 350.000 4.Mdn�Dyw MarrlroN Rehab.(1) 350.000 50.000 100.000 150.000 200.000 350.000 6.GresmlAsSiAven Mer I M Rehab.(1) 200.000 60.000 100.000 150.000 60.000 200.000 0.Rdll St.Marft"Rehab.(1) 230.000 230.000 230.000 SUB-TOTAL RE VWLITATION PROJECTS 7.570.000 75.000 30,000 130.000 330.000 300A00 665.000 S.M.000 7.670.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS L 7,020.000 1W.0001 55. 155.000 355.000 325,000 000,000 0.1120.000 TJ120A00 • Parfally Orrrded by Dlabid No.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION ■III �� /�� �� +�� �� w�� �..� -�� �r ��- - ---- -- - ' County Sanitation District No. 2 Schedule of District Collection System Projeaft CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F G H I J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REO FIVE EST 5 YEAR TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-96 1998-99 1999-20W 2000.01 2001.02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOT COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS11NCREASE CAPACITY 1.Replace Euclid Relief Think Sewer,PA to Edkper(1) 6,750,000 6,750,000 6.750.000 2.Replacemend of Newhope Placentia Trunk.2-3R(2) 6,500.000 250.000 3,000,000 3,250,000 3,250,000 6,500,000 3.Replacement of Cypress Ave.SuMrurk. 24R(2) 5.750.000 250.000 2,000,000 3,000.000 500,000 5,750,000 5.750.000 4.Tall Interceptor Sewer,2$311) 1.800.000 1.800,000 1,600,000 5.Balavla-Lincoln Trunk Ralld(1) 325,000 325.000 325.000 S.Balsa Sewer Relief(1) 460.000 460,000 460.000 7.Santa Ana Rim Intr(SJ1.R.1.)Relld.2-31•(1) 13.414,000 64.000 350,000 2,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 12.350,000 1.000,000 13.350.000 S.Carbon Canyon Dam Trunk Sewer 3 P.S.Abandn.(Z) 1,775,000 175,000 1,500.000 100,000 1,775,000 1,775.000 SUB TOTAL CAP.IMPR CAP. 36,771,000 64,000 175,000 2,100.000 4.100,000 0.250.0001 6,500,000 23.125,000 13,565,000 36,710,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTBIRELIAB 1.Abandoronerd of Yorba Lida Pimp Station (2) 200,000 50.000 50,000 150.000 200.000 2.Santa Ana Rim b*Manhole&Amu.2-14-5R2•(1) 5,052,000 452.000 200.000 200,0W 2.000.000 2.000,000 200.000 4,600,000 4,600.000 3.91 Freeway WWIenkq Projects,2-7A" 105,000 92.000 13.000 13.0W 13.000 4.1-5 Freeway Wldenlnp Project,2-35 •• 109,0m 15,000 50,000 44.OW 94.000 94,000 S.1-5 Freeway Menkq Prajed,2-3A •• 24,000 4,000 20,000 20.000 20.000 6.Santa Ana River kntr Shut 05 Gate Replsoemerd 325.000 75,000 250.0W 325,000 325.000 7.Pump Station MrprovemeNs,2.37•(10%) 398.700 3.700 60,000 60.000 140.000 135.000 395,000 395,000 8.Miscellaneous Projects sw,000 100.000 100.OW 1WAW 100,000 IW,000 500,000 WOW 600.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIREL1A811M h.813.7W 566,700 I 518,000 654.0W 2,240,000 I 2,235.000 1 350,0001 5.997.000 I 250.000 I 6,247,OW REHABILITATM PROJECTS 1.Euclid Trunk Manhole Rehab.2-UR 952.000 122,000 T0.000 730.000 30.600 830,000 630,000 2.South Santa Ana Rhm Think Easement,2-39 16,000 16,000 SUBTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 969.000 136,000 T0,000 730.OW 30,000 630,000 6WAW GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL MAPROVEMENTS 44.555.700 T66,700 763.000 3.464,000 6.370.000 f0.465.000 6,650,000 29,952.000 13,635.000 43.767,000 • Partially howled by Other Districts \ ••Costs to be raknbused by Caltrans 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION 2.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER PLAN DESIGN a CONSTRUCTION `I J r y County Sanitation District No. 3 Schedule of District Collection System Projects- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST RED EST RED EST RED EST RED FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVE ENTSANCREASE CAPACITY 1.Artesie Brandt Subtnnk Relef(3) 400,000 50.000 300,000 50.000 400.000 400,o00 2.Westside Relief Interoeptor Parallel131 5,700,000 5,700,000 5,700,000 3.Wdslside Rebel Tnnk 13) 700.000 700,000 700,000 4.Orange-Westem Subtnrnk Relief Sewer,3-25(2) 1,207.000 57.000 100,000 1,000,000 50,000 1,150,000 1.150.000 S.Knott INT Relief,Orangethorpe to Artesia(3) 3,300.000 100,000 1.500.000 1,500,000 3.100.000 200,000 3.300.000 6.Hoover-Western StAgnx k Relief on Trask(3) 1.050,000 50.000 500,000 500.000 1.050.000 1.050,000. 7.Mitter-Nolder,Mesta to Hillsborough.3-38-1(2) 5,335,000 65,000 150.000 3,000.000 2,000.000 120.000 5,270,OW 5.270,000 8.Miller{Iolder lrnprov., Imperial Hwy.,3-38-3(2) 3.330,000 230.000 2.000.000 1.000.000 100,000 3.100.000 3,100,000 9.Los Afamilos Subtnsdu Relief(3) 5.000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 to.Magnolia Refid Swr.Wstmin.-Trask,3.35R-1(1) 2.300.000 300.000 1,800,000 200,000 .2.000,000 2.000.000 11.Slater Ave.Pump Station Roo.,11-17-1(1)'(12.4%) 1.238.000 1.229.000 10.000 i 10,000 10,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTWINCREASE CAP. 29.560.000 1,880.000 3.960.0001 4,200,000 1 2,400,000 1 3,420,000 2,100,000 16,080,000 1 11,6t10,000 1 27,680,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY 1.Tedrile Pipe Chian.3.38- 2,112,000 2,012.000 100,000 100,000 10Qo00 2. 1-5 Freeway VNderdrg,3.37"'• 43.000 13,000 20.000 1o,o00 30,000 30.000 3.Rabe Portion of Los Atamilos SL&nmk 341-1 65.000 $0.000 15.000 15.000 15.000 4.Pump Station Improvements,2-37•••(14%) 558.200 5.200 84.000 84,000 195.000 189,000 5S3,000 553.000 S.Miscellaneous P(geds I 1.0o0.000 100.0001 lo0,o00 I 1o0,000 I 100,000 1 100,000 wo.o00 I 500.f100 I 1,000,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPRONEMENTSIRELIA ILITY 1 3.770.200 2.080,200 3%000 1 194,000 1 29S.0001 289,000 1 100,W01 1,196,000 1 500.0g0 1 1.698.000 REHABILITATION PROJECT 1.Nidrols Street Tnink Pumk Rehab•(57.8%) (4) 500 000 - 600,000 500,000 2.Magnofe Tnnk Sewer Rehab.3-35R 12) 3.708.000 900,000 750.000 1.500.000 550.000 2,000.000 2,800,000 3.Sod Beach Blvd,Rehab,3-11R 98.000 38,000 20,000 40,000 60,000 60.000 SUB TOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 4.306.000 946.000 770,000 1,540.000 550,000 2,880,000 5W,000 3,360,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL NPROVEMENTS 37.644,200 4,906,200 6.049.000 6,934,000 3,246,000 1 3,109,000 2,200,000 20,138,000 12,6110,000 32.138.000 _El Part"herded by District No.11 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION «Claim/Apped PandkV 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN •«PeAsfy handed by Other Disbtcte 3 MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION «••Sub)ed to rai mbusement by CALTRANS 4.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN A CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 5 Schedule of District Cotlectlon System Projects. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A 0 C D E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST RED EST REG EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1991.98 1998-99 IM2000 2000-01 2MI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002.2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAPACITY 1.W.Coesl Hwy Gravity Tnmk Rehab.5-37-3(20%)•(1) 819,000 599,000 20,000 20.000 20.000 F31340TAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 819,000 599.000 20,000 20,000 20,000 CAPITAL IMPROYMNtS/R 1.Newport Blvd.i PCH Wdenhp.S41•(42%) 2W.000 20.000 180.000 20,000 180,000 180.000 2.Relocation of Lido Army Station.5-41-1•" MAW 25.000 225.000 575.000 70.000 870.000 970.000 3.Pump Station knprovenrenls,2.37••(28%) 1.110.4W 10,4110 188.000 168,000 392,000 378.000 1.108.000 1.108.0011 4.Mlecda umn Proleds 350,000 125,000 1 25,ao0 I 25,000 1 25,000 1 25,000 225,900 1 125,000 1 150,000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELIABILITY I 2.581./00 1 55.4001 878.000 1 788.000 1 487,000 1 403.0001 25.0001 2.381.000 I 125.000 I 2,50e,0oo REHABILITATION PROJECT 1.B19 Carryon Tnmk RehaWlallon(2) 2,000,000 50.000 900,OW 1.0110,000 50AW 2,000.000 2.000.000 2.Bebon Pemkrsrla Rehab 500,000 5110.000 500.000 SIB-TOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS 2.5W.W0 50.000 900.000 IAW.000 50,000 2.000.0W 500.000 2,5110,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 5,880,100 654.400 898,000 838,000 1.W7.000 1.d03,0W 75.000 4.,Wl.ow 82S.o00 8A28.0W •P"My Amded by ix*m No.11 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION «Poftly(ad"by Dow M&b 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION «'Costs parU*shared with Cky e1 Newport 0ea 1 . it County Sanitation District No. 6 Schedule of 1318blet Collecuon Sysbm"nu CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C D E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REO EST REO EST REG EST RE0 FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 1998.99 1OW2000 2000-01 200M YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE 1.W.Coasl Hwy Gm*Tnnk R".5.37-3(80%)•(1) 2,470.000 2,398.000 00,000 80.000 90,000 2:Fairviewlvlew Rd Baker!8.goIMsan SI.,61212) 3,II5.000 380.00D 1,000,000 1,T00,000 385.000 3,053.0W 3,055.0W 3.Dlstrld 8 Tnat Puald(3) 1,325.0W 25.000 3W.000 1,000.000 1.325.000 1.325.000 4.Dover Ddve Tnnk Para§d(3) 1.500.000 100.0w 1.000.000 400,000 1.5m.0m 1.800.000 5.C~Ave.P.S.Parald F.M.(5%)"(2) 74.000 1,500 7,500 85,000 72.SW 72.$W SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAP. 8=000 2.777,5W 87,500 1, ,00 0850 1.825.000 1.88 00 5.000 1,40Q0 8,042,5W 8,042.SW CAMAL 1.NewpoA Blvd.&PCH VMderdnp,5-41(58%) 277.000 28.0W 221.0W 28.000 249.000 249.000 2.Walton Ave I CaMonia Strad Sewer.0-13(2) 1,0110.000 35,0W 110,000 915.000 1,025,000 1,025,0W 3.Wdefq d MW 8su Crib Mesa 100,000 100.000 100,0m 4.Woodane"Pro)eds 250,OOD 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 125,000 125,000 250.000 s.Pump Slamn Improvement.2.37•"(8%) 239.200 2.200 38,000 30.000 84,000 e1.000 237,000 237.OW SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMEWSIRELIAMI.ITY 1.920.200 e5.200 392,000 1.0a.000 109,000 100.000 25,OW 1.08,000 225.000 1.881.0m GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 10,718,200 2 842,700 1T9,500 2 089,000 1.934.000 1.771.000 1,425,0W 7.878,500 225,000 7.903,500 • Podgy funded by DI*ld No.5 " Perfidy Ilnded by DbMd No.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION «. puldy hmded by Other Dlstrkls 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 3.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 7 Schedule of Dlstdct Collection System Prof" CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C O E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997.98 1096.99 1988.20W 200"1 2WI-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPIM 1.Oranpe Palk Acres Tnadr Replamrient,7.17(2) $21,000 37,000 50.000 600.000 134,000 761,000 784.000 2.Tustin Air Base Facilities (3) 5.750.000 150.000 2.000.000 3,000,000 500,000 11110.111130 • 5,750,000 5.750.000 3.Nodh Tnnk Reptacemard(3) 2.650.000 50.000 1.400,000 1.000.000 2.450.000 200.000 2,650,000 4. Gisler-Red HI IntemVior(3) 5,300.000 300.000 300.000 6.000.000 5.300.000 S.Red Hit lntereeplor Parallel(3) 1.400,000 1,400,000 1.400.000 6.Lemon He1pMs Sewer Replaoemeni, 7.22-112(3) 5.414.000 1,a64,000 550,000 2.000.000 2.550A00 1,000.000 3.650.000 7.Brownkip Tnnk Repleon.e. 13) 850.000 850,000 850.000 B.Collepe Ave PS Parallel Faroe Maim?-23-1M%)-(2) 1,405,000 27.000 143,000 1.235.000 1.378,000 1.378.000 9.Improveme ds to Maki SL P.S..7-7.1(28%)'(2) 907,000 217.000 050.000 100.000 750,000 750.000 10.Main$t.Prarp Station ErrpandorL 7.7.2 In%)•(3) 775,000 775.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.n4PROVEMENTSMNCRE ASE CAP. 25.332,1100 2.149.000 993.000 3.935.000 1 3.484,000 1 2,450,000 3.100,000 13.902AW 0,450.0001 22,412.000 T73200 1.Pump Station krprovemerds.2.37 (33%)-(3) 1.315.200 12,2w 198.000 19e.000 402,000 443,000 1.303A00 1.303.000 2.Pump Station Abandonmerd.7.14.3(3) 425.000 75.000 200.000 150.000 425.000 425.000 3.Miscelenean Projects 500,000 50.000 50.000 50.000 50,000 50.0w 250,000 2SOA00 500.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRE(1A81UTY 2,240.200 12,200 248.000 323,000 1 712,000 1 845.000 50,000 1,1179,000 250.000 1 2.248,000 REHABILITAXIONPROJECTS 1.surdiower Mw*mb Ralub,7-21 (70%)-(3) 308,000 1.000 70.000 195.000 50.000 306.000 305,000 2.Mlsodanem Repair d Local Sewers (4) 5,800,000 1110 1.200,000 1,200.000 1.200.000 1.200,000 4.900.000 700.500 6,600,000 SUB-TOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS S,906.000 1.000 100.000 1.270.000 1.366.000 I 1.250.000 1,200.000 5.20SA00 700,000 0,000SA00 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 33.478.200 2.158.200 1,341.000 6.528.000 SAB1A00 4,345,000 4.350A00 21.145A00 9.400,000 30.545.000 =7750w •Prvally ilnded by Obk1d No.14 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY HOER CONSTRUCTION Poo*kmded by District No.1 2.MASTER-KAMM FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN Partially Uatded by District No.0 3.MASTER-PLAMED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION «»Pwll*handed by Other DbHAr4s 4.CONTEMPLATED FOR FUTURE MASTER-PLAN DESIGN a CONSTRUCTION > ;e E County Sanitation District No. II Schedule of District CollsWon System Proleds_ • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A a C D E F O H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REG EST REG EST REG EST REG FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-90 199&99 1OW2000 200"1 200"2 YEAR TOTAL 2002.2007 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAPACITY I.SlaterAve.Pump Stallm Rep1.,11-17-1(1)'(97.6%) 6,520,000 6,450.000 70.000 70.000 70.00o 2.Goldenwaat SL Sewer Repla M 11-17-2 11) 2.730,000 4000 135,000 300.000 2.000,000 50.000 2.685.000 2.665.000 3.Slater Ave.Relief(2) 1,700.000 1.700.000 1,700,000 1.He1 IMereeptar(2) 3.150.000 150.000 3,000,000 3.150,000 3,150.000 5.SlaIwr*rkVdale Replacerrh 1 (2) 600.000 sm.000 600.000 S.Wamer Ave Sewer Relle1(2) 1.500.000 1.500.000 me.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIINCREASE CAP. 15.100,000 0.495.0001 205.000 1 500.000 2.000,000 1 200.000 2.Ot1O.000 5.905.000 I 4.000,000 9.905.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTSBELIABILITY 1.MmIl lon Beady Purclume AbWW.11-16(2) 525.000 75.000 250.000 325.000 325,000 2.Pump SWw Wpmvemahb,2d7(9%)"(21 350,300 3,300 54,000 54.000 120.000 121.000 355J100 355.000 3.t6trtdaim a Prof 600.ato 150.000 50.000 So 000 50.Ow So.000 350,O00 I 25QO00 I 600.000 SUBTOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSIRELUIBILITY 1 1,283.300 3,3001 279.0001 354.0001 178.000 1 171.0001 50.0001 1.090,0110 1 250.0001 1.260,000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 17.583.300 6.196.300 481.000 854.000 2.175.000 371.000 3.050.000 6,OX=I /.250.000 11.165.000 • Partally haled by OhIdd No.3 ••pwilafy horded by Other DISbIda 1.MASTER44 ANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION County Sanitation District No. 14 Schedule of District Collection System Projeetst. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS A B C O E F 0 H 1 J K L TOTAL COST PRIOR YEARS BUDGET EST REQ EST REG EST REQ EST REQ FIVE EST 5 YEARS TEN COST TO PROJECT TO 2020 PURCHASES 1997-98 1998.99 1999-20W 2000-01 2001-02 YEAR TOTAL 2002-2001 YEAR TOTAL COMPLETE CAPITAL IMpROVEMENTSANCREASECAPACITY 1.Improvenrenta b Main St.P.S.,7-7-1(12%)'(1) 2,120,000 195,000 1,e75,000 250.000 1.025.000 1.925,000 2.Malr StrM Pump Sawn EVenslon,7.7-2(72%)"(2) 2,000,000 2.000.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.IMPROVEMENTSANCREASE CAP. 1,120.000 195,000 1,073,000 250.000 1.925.000 .1.925.000 2,000.000 CAPITAL IMP11MMENTS03JABiLM 1.M130140neow Plrpleds 250.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25,000 25.000 125.000 128,000 250.000 SUB-TOTAL CAP.WWAAMMENTSIRELIABpJTY 250.000 25,000 25,000 25.000 25.000 25.000 125,000 125.000 250.000 GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 4.370.000 195.000 1.700.000 275.000 1 25.0001 28.000 I 25.000 2.050,0001 125.000 1 2./78.000 2,000,000 • ParBdy Muted by 01*1d No.? Future construction near 2020.pwgay Muted by 0.7 1.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES PRESENTLY UNDER DESIGN 2.MASTER-PLANNED FACILITIES SCHEDULED FOR FUTURE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION