Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 1988 - 0073•RESOLUTION NO.88-73 APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL,JOB NO.J—22 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS.1,2,3, 5,6,7,11,13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL,JOB NO.J-22,PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF AND DIRECTING FILING OF A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION **************** The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,. 7,11,13 and 14 of Orange County,California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE,DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1 That the project for which thi.s determination is made is the Replacement of Portions of Standby Ocean Outfall,Job No.J—22,the rehabilitation of part of the land portion of the existing standby ocean outfall,is a cooperative project with the California Department of Transportation and the Huntington Beach Coastal Conservancy. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are the “Lead Agency”as defined by CEQA;and, Section 2 That an Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment, which said assessment is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”,of the environmental effects of said project have been undertaken and completed by the Districts,and the results thereof have been reviewed by these Boards;and, Section 3 Based on the findings of the Initial Study,these Boards determine that the proposed project could have an effect on the environment,but there will not be a significant effect because of the mitigation measures —1— described within the Negative Declaration which is attached hereto;and, Section 4 That said •Negative Declaration has been circulated for public review for a period from April 20,1988 to May 23,1988,during which time the following coments were received on the document: A.City of Villa Park dated May 9,1988 (No coninents) B.City of Garden Grove dated May 13,1988 (No cotmients) C.City of Irvine dated May 19,1988 (No conilients) Section 5 That these Boards hereby note all coniTients received on the Negative Declaration for the Replacement of Portions of Standby Ocean Outfall, Job No.J—22;and, Section 6 That,for reasons set forth in said Exhibit “A°and in accordance with the migitation measures incorporated therein and by this Resolution,it is hereby found that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment and,therefore,the Boards hereby approve the Negative Declaration regarding the environmental impacts of said project;and, Section 7 That the Secretary be,and Is hereby,authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution,the aforesaid Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment and the Negative Declaration at the Districts’ office to be available for public inspection and copying;and, Section 8 That the Secretary be,and is hereby,authorized and directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,as amended. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 8,1988. -2- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA 1a844 ELLIS AVENUE P.O.Box 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLE’q.CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 (714)962-2411 INITIAL STUDY (To Be Completed by Lead Agency) I.Background A.Name of Proponent County Sanitation Districts of Orange County B.Address and Phone Number of Proponent ___________________________________ 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,California 92708 (714)962—2411 C.Contact Person Thomas M.Dawes D.Title and Location of Project ________________________________________ Replacement of Portions of Standby Ocean Outfall,Job No.J-22 Treatment Plant No.2 22212 Brookhurst Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 E.Description of Project Replacement of deteriorated section of 78—inch diameter pipeline with 12O~-inch diameter pipeline EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION NO.88—73 II.Guidelines A.Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined,in Section 28. Yes X No (If activity does not qualify as project,do not complete remainder of form) B.Does the project qualify as: 1.Ministerial (Section 6)Yes ____ No X 2.Emergency (Section 13)Yes ________ 3.A feasibility or planning study (Section 33) 4.Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines (Section 40)Yes ____ No X 5.Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency (Section 36)Yes ____ No X If yes,identify lead agency: (If yes has been checked for any of the above,an Environmental Impact Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need not be prepared). III.Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all “yes”and “maybe”answers are required on attached sheets). A.Earth.Will the proposal result in: !!~Maybe t~2 1.Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? 2.Disruptions,displacements,compaction or overcovering of the soil? 3.Change in topography or ground surface relief features? 4.The destruction,covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? 5.Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,either on or off the site? __________ x ____________ x __________ x ____ x ____ No X Yes ____ No X _____ x Yes Maybe No 6.Changes in desposition or erosion of beach sands or changes in silation,deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay,inlet or lake? ________ X 7.Exposure of people or property to geological hazards such as earthquakes,landslides, mudslides,ground failure or similar hazard? ________ X B.Air.Will the proposal result in: 1.Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? ________ X 2.The creation of objectionable odors? ________ X 3.Alteration of air movement,moisture or temperature or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? ________ X C.Water.Will the proposal result in: 1.Change in currents or the course of direction of water movements in either marine or fresh water? ________ X 2.Changes in absorption rates,drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface runoff? ________ X 3.Alterations to the course of flow of flood waters? ________ X 4.Change in the amountof surface water in any water body? ________ X 5.Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality, including,but not limited to,temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ________ X• 6.Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? ________ X 7.Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals,or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? ________ X Yes Maybe No 8.Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? ________ x 9.Exposure of people or property to related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? ________ X D.Plant Life.Will proposal result in: 1.Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of plants (including trees,shrubs,grass,crops and aquatic plants)? ________ x 2.Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? ____ ____ X 3.Introduction of new species of plants into an area or in a barrier to the nomal replenishment of existing species? ________ X 4.Reduction in acreage of any agriculture crop? ____ ____ X E.Animal Life.Will proposal result in: 1.Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles,fish and shellfish,benthic organisms or insects? ________ X 2.Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals?x 3.Introduction of new species of animals into an area or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? ____ ____ x 4.Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? ________ X F.Noise.Will the proposal result in: 1.Increase in existing noise levels?X 2.Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ________ X G.Light and Glare.Will the proposal produce light or glare? ________ X Yes Maybe No H.Land Use.Will the proposal result In a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? ________ X I.Natural Resources.Will the proposal result in: 1.Increase In the rate of use of any natural resources? ________ X 2.Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? ________ X J.Risk of Upset.Will the proposal involve: 1.A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,but not limited to,oil,pesticides,chemicals or radiation)in the event of an accident or upset conditions? ________ X 2.Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? ________ X K.Population.Will the proposal alter the location,distribution,density or growth rate of the human population of an area? ____ X L.Housing.Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? ________ X M.Transportation/Circulation.Will the proposal result in: 1.Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? ________ X 2.Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? ________ X 3.Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? ________ X 4.Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? ________ X 5.Alterations to waterborne,rail or air traffic? ________ X Yes Maybe No 6.Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,bicyclists or pedestrians? ________ X N.Public Services.Will the proposal have an effect upon or result In a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: 1.Fire protection?x 2.Police protection?X 3.Schools?X 4.Parks or other recreational facilities?X 5.Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?X 6.Other governmental service?X 0.Energy.Will the proposal result in: 1.Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? ________ x 2.Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? ________ X P.Utilities.Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to the following utilities: 1.Power or natural gas?X 2.Comunications systems?x 3.Water?X 4.Sewer or septic tanks?X 5.Storm water drainage?X 6.Solids waste and disposal?X Q.Human Health.Will the proposal result in: 1.Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health?) ________ X Yes Maybe No 2.Exposure of people to potential health hazards? ________ X R.Aesthetics.Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to the public view? ________ X S.Recreation.Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? ________ X 1.Cultural Resources. 1.Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeaological site? ________ X 2.Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? ________ x 3.Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ________ X 4.Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ________ X U.Mandatory Findings of Significance. 1.Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self—sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ____________ Yes Maybe No 2.Does the project have the potential to achieve short—term,to the disadvantage of long—term,environmental goals?(A short— term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief,definitive period of time,while long—term impacts will endure well into the future). ________ X 3.Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulative considerable?(A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small,but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant). ________ x 4.Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ________ X IV.Discussion of Environmental Evaluation See attached sheet. V.Discussion of Zoning Compatibility Installation will be replacing existing facilities. VI.Determination (To be completed by Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed’project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project.A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.XXX I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date:C~,~2~,NITATION ~L~~RICTS OF ~4~i ~ omas M Dawe Director of Engineering EXPLANATION OF COMMENTS IN ITEM III OF INITIAL STUDY III.Environmental Impacts A.5.:Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,either on or off the site?MAYBE. Standard construction techniques would mitigate this potential impact,such as watering to control dust. F.1.:Increase in existing noise levels?YES. There would be an increase over existing noise levels due to construction activities.However,the construction is likely to occur at the same time that major highway expansion improvements are underway and there will be an increase in background levels for the period of construction.No nearby residential dwellings are likely to experience adverse impacts from replacement of the outfall pipeline. EXPLANATION OF ITEM IV OF INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Name of Project:Replacement of Portions of Standby Ocean Outfall Job No.J-22 Location:County Sanitation Districts Treatment Plant No.2 22212 Brookhurst Street Huntington Beach,California Entity of Person Undertaking Project: A.District Thomas M.Dawes,Director of Engineering B.Other Staff Determination: The Districts’staff,having undertaken and completed an Initial Study of this project in accordance with Section 15063 of the Amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act,for the purpose of ascertaining whether the proposed project might have significant effect on the environ ment,has reached the following conclusion: XX 1.The project will not have a significant long term effect on the environment because of the mitigation measures incorporated; therefore,a Negative Declaration can be prepared. 2.The project could have a significant effect on the environment; therefore,an EIR will be required. April ~e’988 Director of Engineering STATE OF CALIFORNIA) )SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I,RITA J.BROWN,Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 of Orange County, California,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.88—73 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Boards on the 8th day of June, 1988,by the following vote,to wit: AYES:Margaret M.Arnold,Ben Bay,A.B.“Buck”Catlin,John C.Cox, •Jr.,Norman E.Culver,Richard B.Edgar,John Erskine,Don R. Griffin,Dan Griset,Robert Hanson,Evelyn Hart,Ronald B. Hoesterey,Gene A.Leyton,Wiliam D.Mahoney,Philip Maurer, Tom Mays,Sally Anne Miller,James Neal,Carrey J.Nelson, Arthur G.Newton,Richard 1.Polis,Don R.Roth,Sal Sapien, J.R.“Bob”Siefen,Wayne Silzel,Don E.Smith,Roger R. • Stanton,John H.Sutton,Charles E.Sylvia,James A.Wahner, Edna Wilson NOES:None ABSENT:Roland E.Bigonger,Todd Murphy,Peer A.Swan IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No.1 on behalf of itself and Districts Nos.2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 of Orange County,California,this 8th day of June,1988. Rita J.Br ,Secretary Boards of Directors,County • Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,~3,5, 6,7,11,13 and 14 of Orange County, California