Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 1988 - 0017RESOLUTION NO.88-17 APPROVING PROPOSED ORANGE COUNTY REORGANIZATION NO.111 -REORGANIZATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS.7 AND 14 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS.OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS.7 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING PROPOSED ORANGE COUNTY REORGANIZATION NO.111 - REORGANIZATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS.7 AND 14 (CONSISTING SOLELY OF DETACHMENTS AND ANNEXATIONS)AND DIRECTING THAT A PROPOSAL BE FILED WITH THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF ORANGE COUNTY REQUESTING INITIATION OF SAID REORGANIZATION PROCEEDINGS WHEREAS,approximately 20.7 acres of territory located north of Warner Avenue and east of the Peters Canyon Channel in Irvine was initially filed with the Local Agency Formation Corrrnission as proposed Annexation No.104 -MCAS/LTA Family Housing Annexation to County Sanitation District No.7 prior to the recent formation of County Sanitation District No.14 of Orange County;and, WHEREAS,proceedings for said proposed annexation were delayed for various reasons including processing by the U.S.Navy,the property owner,and pending determinations relative to future property tax exchanges for said territory; and, WHEREAS,the said territory within proposed Annexation No.104 was included within the boundaries of County Sanitation District No.14 when said District No.14 was formed;and,. • WHEREAS,sewer service for said territory will be provided by County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County;and,therefore,it is deemed desirable to detach the MCAS/LTA Family Housing area from District No.14 and annex said territory to District No.7,in accordance with the Cortese—Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985,Division 3,commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code;and, WHEREAS,the owner of the territory proposed to be reorganized has consented to this reorganization;and, WHEREAS,this proposal is consistent with the sphere of influence of the affected Districts. NOW,THEREFORE,the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.7 and 14 of Orange County,California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE,DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1 That these Boards of Directors do hereby approve and request the Local Agency Fomation Corr~iiission (LAFCO)to initiate proceedings re proposed “ORANGE COUNTY REORGANIZATION NO.111 -REORGANIZATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS.7 AND 14”(consisting solely of detachments and anhexations),for the purpose of transferring the territory to the District which provides its sewerage service,as set forth and described in the Justification of Proposal Questionnaire attached hereto as Exhibit “A”to this resolution,which said document is incorporated herein by this reference;and, Section 2 That these Boards of Directors hereby request approval of the herein described proposal by LAFCO;and, Section 3 That the Districts have the consent of the only property owner,the Department of the Navy,to this reorganization which consists solely of an annexation of territory to County Sanitation District No.7 and a detachment of the same territory from County Sanitation District No.14;and, therefore,request that the Local Agency Formation Commission,pursuant to •Government Code Section 56837,authorize District No.7 to conduct proceedings for the reorganization without notice,hearing or election;and, Section 4 That the General Manager,General Counsel and their designees are hereby authorized and directed to file proposed ORANGE COUNTY REORGANIZATION NO.111 —REORGANIZATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS.7 AND 14,on behalf of County Sanitation Districts ~Nos.7 and 14,as soon as possible,and to take all further appropriate actions to obtain LAFCO’s approval of said reorganization;and, Section 5 That District No.7 hereby reserves the right to commence proceedings at any time to negotiate an exchange of property tax revenues, pursuant to Subsection (j)of Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code,for the current or subsequent fiscal years;and, Section 6 That Resolution No.87—140—7,adopted October 14,1987,and subsequently filed with the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County, is hereby rescinded;and the Secretary of the Board is hereby authorized and directed to file this Resolution with the Local Agency Formation Commission in place thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 10,1988. JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL QUESTI ONNA IRE California Government Code Section 6479~requires the Local Agency Formation Corn-. mission to consider specific factors in regards any change of organization of local agencies.In order to facilitate the Commission’s review and pursuant to its Bylaw NO.31,complete the following questionnaire.(Attach additional sheets as necessary) General Information 1.Name of Proposal: ORANGE COUNTY R~RGANIZATION NO.111 -REORGANIZATION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS.7 AND 14 2.Description of Proposal :(check one) ______annexation _______municipal incorporation ______detachment _______district formation X reorganization (any of the above involving-two or more cities and/or districts 3.Summarize the reasons for the proposed action. Provide sewer service for Marine Corps housing 4.Does the application possess 100 percent consent of each property owner in the subject territory?yes X no ______. Attach letter of consent. 5.List the Assessor Parcel Number,Assessee and Tax Rate Code Area for each involved parcel.(List available from Orange County Assessor) Assessor Parcel No.434—062—08 Tax Rate Code Area 26-032 6.What is the total assássed valuation of the subject territory? (a)land $4,478,851 (b)improvements I ______________ TOTALS $4,478,851 7.What is the total land area?20.7 acres EXHIBIT “A”W RESOLUTION NO.88-17 ——...—‘—.—. Land Use 1.What is the General Plan Land Use designation for the site?. -Orange County _______________________ Affected city—Business &Industrial 2.Describe any special land use concerns expressed inthe above plans. None 3.Indicate the existing land use,including the number of units. Business &Industrial 4.What is the prcposed land use (include Precise Plan or Development Plan~ where applicable)? Residential S.Indicate the existing zoning 6.What is the pr~pcsed zoning 7.Has the area been pre;one~ No. Develooment Reserve Same If yes,what is the .prezcni~g class~f~.c3:~cr1’ S.How niany cersons reside on the site?34 9.List each registered voter within the subject territory (list available from Orange County Registrar of Voters). 34 registered voters reside on site,however there is no •need to obtain consent of residence because we have consent of property owner. 10.Describe the surrounding land uses. Northeast:air station Southeast:residential Southwest:multiple uses,including commercial and institutional Northwest:industrial 11.Is the site located within a city’s boundaries?If yes,name the city. City of Irvine 12.Is the subject territory located with in “is1at~d”.of unincorporated territory? _______Yes ________Mo. 13.Would approval of this proposal create an “island”of unincorporated territory? _______Yes x Mo If yes,justify why other unincorporated territory should not be included in the subject proposal. 14.Describe the proximity of the subject territory to populated areas. The nearest populated area to the Marine Enlisted Housing Area is *mile away. lE.Is there a likelihood of a significant increase in population in the subject area within the next ten years2 Yes X No _____. Estimate any poculaticn increase. 16.Is there a likelihood of a significant increase in population of adjacent areas within the next ten years?Yes X Na _____. Estimate any population increase The “Village Fourteen”will have thirteen thousand to twenty—six thousand.The rate is estimated to be fifteen percent annually on page 35 of the Environmental Assessment enclosed with this questionnaire. Environmental Setti~ 1.Describe the location of the project area,including the major highway access, nearest intersection,etc. The parcel is reached via two—lane Harvard Avenue.It is bounded by Peters Canyon channel on i~ts northwest,the Marine Corps Air Station on its northeast,the Edison right-of-way and a short segment of Harvard Avenue on its southeast,and the graded street called Warner on its southwest. 2.Describe the site’s topography. The 18.81 acres is part of a nearly flat coastal plain.The average elevation is -fifty—three feet above sea level.Slope is less than one percent. 3.Describe any wat~rcourses,ridgelines,canyons,flood.ccntrol channels,freeways, railroads,etc.adjacent to the site. There is an arroyo known as Peters Canyon channelS. 4.State the proximity of the site to any airport and/or flight path. The parcel is integral to the helicopter base. 5.List any approved spheres of influence for any local agencies which may be applicable to the site. None 6.Does the proposal involve territcrj under an.agricultural preser’ie contract? If yes,list the parties involved in such contract. No. 7.Has either a “~OTTCZ OF ~GN_RENE~.ALI or ‘~OTIC OF C~CZLL~TION~’been filed with •the County Recorder~s Office?If yes,state the data of filing. No. 8..Will the proposal decrease the amount of land available far open space or agricul~ura1 uses?Ye~X ~{a______ A 20.7 acre •decrease in agricultural land and a minor increase in private oper space 9.Could the prc~asal ser’ie to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas,or increase intens~ty of development of already developed areas? Yes ________ ~o X Air Station facilities. • COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING I*ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT”SECTION IF THE SUBJECT TERRITORY IS PRESENTLY UNDEVELOPED. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Are the following fte.ms applicable to the project or its effects?Discuss below all items checked yes.(Attach additional sheets as necessary). Yes.No — X 1.Change in existing features of any bays,tidelands,beaches, lakes or hills,or substantial alteration of ground contours. — X 2.Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. — X 3.Change in pattern,scale or character of general areaof project. — X 4.Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. — X 5.Change in dust,ash,smoke,fumes or odors in vicinity. — X 6.Change in ocean,bay,lake,stream or ground water quality or quantity,alteration of existing drainage patterns. x 7.Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity.. — X 8.Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. — x 9.Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity,oil natural gas,etc.) — 10.Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. This is an expansion or extension of an existing housing complex. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements f~shed above ~in the az:ac~ed exhibits present the data and inforrnatio~reg~ed for this~nitial evaluation to the best of my ability,and that the ~áct~’At,~tements and i\nfor mation presented are true and correct to the best 7’f my ~ow1edge and belijef. Date 3-3-88 .~ • signature • For Orange County Sanitation District Plan of Services tdentify in Column (1)the uexistinght service provider for the following service cate’cries.tf the service is not currently provided,write ‘not provided”in the respective space.Identify in Column (2)all changes in service providero if the ‘proDased”change of organization is ccrrrpietad. Police Protection _______________ Fire Protection ______________ Rescue _________________ Paramedi c __________________________________ Ambulance ________________________________ Animal Control _______________________________ ~.—~t_•_ Collection ___________________________ Treatnerit _________________ ___________________ Disposal Reclaniati on _________________________________ WATER Acquisition Storage Distribution ELECT~.I CIT’f SCUD WASTE Collection Di spasal T~SIT PUSUC WORKS STREET3 Ccns~ructi on Mai ntenanca Swee~i rig Lighting F1..000 CO~1T~OL I RWD IRWO TRwn So.Cal.Edison Franchised Private Franchised Private Orange Co.Transit Dedicated to City ___________ City of Irvine ___________ City of Irvine ___________ Liohtina District ___________ Orange Co.Flood Control District PUBLIC SAFETY (1) Existing (2) Pro DOS ad UTILITIES City of Irvine County of Orange County of Orange of OrangeCounty County of Orange Cit~y of Irvine I RWD I RWD TRWD I RWD O.C.S.D.#7 O.C.S.D.#7 O.C.S.D.#7 O.C.S.D.#7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (1) Ex I sting (2) Proposed Planning Code Enforcement. Redevel opnient City of Irvine City 6f Irvine City of Irvine LEISURE SERVICES Park Recreati on Li brary City of Irvine City of Irvine County of Orange For each service identified in column (2) (district),describe: as being provided by the affected (city) 1.The location from which each service is to be provided (e.g.nearest present or proposed fire station,utility line,library,etc.) All services to be extended,from present source within Marine Corps Air Station Enlisted Personnel Housing Area. 2.The service level to be provided.Reference should be made to service level standards,such as frequency of street sweeping,average response times for e.mergericy services,watar service pressure zones,sewage treatment capacities, etc.) Sewer treatment plant,capacity of OCSD#7 will allow for.the proposed reorganization of sewer district boundarie~. 3.If the service level to be provided exceeds the existing service level capacity,what action will be taken to increase t~e existing capacity,and estimate the cost of increasing such capacity. Capacity in Orange County Sanitation District Seven will be adequate by the time a territorial reorganization and construction of the additional. housing can b~cornpleted. 4.If any service is not to be provided upon completion of proceedincs,when will the service be provided? Not applicable. —/ 5.The e~timatad cost of extending the service,to the affected territorj. Extension of local lines costs approximately fifty dollars per foot. 6.Any conditions which would be imposed or required within the affected territory,,such as,but not limited to,improvement or upgrading of structures,roads,sewer or water faci ii ties,and the estimated cost thereof. No consequential requirements. 7.How will seriices and improvernenta be financed? The landowner will pay for the installation of the local lines and their connection.The lines are then turned over to.Orange County Sanitation District for operation.The Sanitation District owns the trunk line and treatment facilities to which the new lines areto be connected. 8.Describe what action will be taken to detach the site from any where a duplication of seriice and charges would result if the action is approved. Not applicable if this request for reorganization approved. district(s) proposed -3- Prc’viäe the names,addresses and telephone numbers of persons (3 MAXIMUM)who are to be furnished copies of the LAFC Agenda and Executive Officer’s report and who are to be given mailed notice of hearing. Name J.Wayne Sylvest~r Address P.O.Box 8127 Telephone No. Fountain Valley,CA 92728—812 Applicant’s Name:Orange County Sanitation District Address:P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,Ca.92728-8127 3-3-88 Date - •STATE OF CALIFORNIA) )SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I,RITA J.BROWN,Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.7 and 14 of Orange County,California,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.88—17 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Boards on the 10th day of February,1988,by the following vote,to wit: District 7 AYES:Richard B.Edgar,Chairman,John C.Cox,Jr.,Dan Griset,Don R.Roth,Don E.Smith,James A.Wahner NOES: ABSENT: District 14 AYES:Ursula E.Kennedy,Chairman pro tern,Darryl G.Miller,Don R. Roth,Don E.Smith NOES:None ABSENT:Sally Anne Miller IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No.7 on behalf of itself and District No.14 of Orange County,California,this 10th day of February,1988. None Sally Anne Miller Rita J.Brown,Secretary Boards of Directors,County Sanitation Districts Nos.7 and.14 of Orange County,California