HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 1988 - 0015RESOLUTION NO.88-15
APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE INTERIM
BIOGAS POWER GENERATION FACILITY AT
TREATMENT PLANT NO.2,PROJECT TP-1
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS.1,2,3,
5,6,7,11,-13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA,APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
RE INTERIM BIOGAS POWER GENERATION FACILITY
AT TREATMENT PLANT NO.2,PROJECT TP-1,
PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF AND DIRECTING
FILING OF A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,
7,11,13 and 14 of Orange County,California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE,DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1 That the project for which this determination is made is the
O’Brien Energy Systems’Interim Biogas Power Generation Facility,a 1.2 megawatt
digester—gas fueled generating station owned and operated by O’Brien Energy
Systems to be located at Treatment Plant No.2 in Huntington Beach,California.
The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County are the “Lead Agency”as
defined by CEQA;and,
Section 2 That an Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment,
which said assessment is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”,of the environmental
effects of said project have been undertaken and completed by the Districts,and
the results thereof have been reviewed by these Boards;and,
Section 3 Based on the findings of the Initial Study,these Boards
determine that the proposed project could have an effect on •the environment,but
there will not be a significant effect because of the mitigation measures
described within the Negative Declaration which is attached hereto;and,
Section 4 That said Negative Declaration has been circulated for public
review for a period from December 29,1987 to January 20,1988,during which
time the following coments were received on the document:
A.Costa Mesa Sanitary District dated January 11,1988
(No concerns)
B.Mr.Charles Gumpel dated January 18,1988
(Concerns relative to noise and emissions)
C.City of Irvine dated January 26,1988
(No coments)
D.City of Garden Grove dated January 27,1988
(No convuents)
Section 5 That these Boards hereby note all cormients received on the
Negative Declaration for the Interim Biogas Power Generation Facility at
Treatment Plant No.2,Project TP—1;and,
Section 6 That,for reasons set forth in said Exhibit “A”and in
accordance with the migitation measures incorporated in Exhibit “B”and by this
Resolution,it is hereby found that said project will not have a significant
effect on the environment and,therefore,the Boards hereby approve the Negative
Declaration regarding the environmental impacts of said project;and,
Section 7 That the Secretary be,and is hereby,authorized and directed
to file a certified copy of this resolution,the aforesaid Initial Study and
Environmental Impact Assessment and the Negative Declaration at the Districts’
office to be available for public inspection and copying;and,
Section 8 That the Secretary be,and is hereby,authorized and directed
to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,as amended.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 10,1988.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Name of Project:Interim Biogas Power Generation Facility at
Orange County Sanitation Districts’Treatment
Plant No.2 in Huntington Beach,California
Location:22212 Brookhurst Street
Huntington Beach,California
Entity or Person Undertaking Project:
A.District
_____________________________________________
B.Other O’Brien Energy Systems
Staff Determination:
The Districts’staff,having undertaken and completed an Initial Study of
this project in accordance with Section 15063 of the Amendments to the
California Environmental Quality Act,for the purpose of ascertaining
whether the proposed project might have significant effect on the
environment,has reached the following conclusion:
X 1.The project will not have a significant long term effect on
the environment because of the mitigation measures
incorporated;therefore,a Negative.Declaration can be
prepared.
2.The project could have a significant effect on the
environment;therefore,an EIR will be required.
Date homas M.Oawes
Director of Engineering
EXHIBIT “A”TO RESOLUTION NO.88-15
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA
10844 EWS AVENUE
P.O.BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
-(714)962-2411
INITIAL STUDY
AND
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
RE:
INTERIM BIOGAS POWER GENERATION FACILITY
AT TREATMENT PLANT NO.2
PROJECT TP-1
JANUARY 1988
PREPARED FOR:
O’BRIEN ENERGY SYSTEMS
LEAD AGENCY:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
(714)962—2411
Contact Person:Thomas M.Dawes
PREPARED BY:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
EXHIBIT “B”TO RESOLUTION NO.88-15
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction and Project Description Page 1
Technical Data Page 2
Environmental Analysis Page 3
Findings Page 4
Public Notice Page 5
Initial Study Page 6
Environmental Impact Assessment Page 16
Li
INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The County Sanitation Districts of O~’ange County will act as Lead Agency for the
installation of an Interim Biogas Power Generation Facility at Treatment Plant
No.2 in Huntington Beach.As a byproduct of wastewater treatment,the
Districts generate digester gas which is an excellent fuel source high in com
bustible methane gas.A portion of the two million cubic feet per day of gas is
used to fuel twenty—five existing large Internal combustion engines and the por
tion which is surplus is flared (burned to the atmosphere)and the energy value
is lost.Because the digester gas is a valuable resource,as part of the
overall plan to reduce energy purchases,the Districts have investigated ways to
utilize the gas on an interim basis until larger,permanent central power
generation facilities are placed into service in 1990—1991 to use all the
available gas.At that time the interim facilities will be removed from the
site.One system investigated was the O’Brien Energy System,Interim Biogas
Power Generation.
O’Brien plans to install a 1.2 megawatt generation station,at no cost to the
Sanitation Districts,at the Huntington Beach plant.The station would utilize
high—speed (about 1200 rpm)internal combustion spark—ignited engines to drive
generators.The engines and generators are housed in portable,modular sheds
which look like a large truck trailer.Two modular units will be used,
requiring a 10,000 square—foot site.Power would be produced at the 12 KV level
and fed directly to the Districts’existing electrical distribution system.
O’Brien proposes to sell the power to the Districts at 75%of the avoided cost
of purchasing the electricity from Edison,a 25%savings to the Districts.
The generating units are guaranteed to be.“residential°quiet.There is no
capital investment required by the Districts and,in fact,utilization of the
gas now being wasted would save additional planned capital expenses for lar.ger
flares.
The Districts’Boards of Directors,on November 12,1986 received and filed the
Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment for the Interim Biogas Power
Generation System.The Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment for
the project were completed and it was determined that a Mitigated Negative
Declaration could be prepared to comply with provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act.The Initial •Study was circulated;however,after
further review,the project was put on hold until O’Brien could obtain a permit
from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).
O’Brien has now obtain a Permit to Construct from SCAQMD.However,the project,
at 1.2 megawatts,is smaller than the original project (up to 4 megawatts).
—1—
TECHNICAL DATA
O’Brien Energy Systems will install and operate a nominal 1200 KW system which
is designed to operate on approximately 400 cubic feet per minute of waste
digester gas produced by the Orange County Sanitation Districts’digesters.
The system consists of two generating units.
Caterpillar with a 650 kilowatt-rated O’Brien
closed loop radiator type lubricating oil and
jacket water and engine exhaust are connected
Each generating unit is packaged in an.insulator,noise suppression container
which contains the engine/si,generator,lube oil and aftercooler heat exchanger
rads and associated piping,battery charger,lube oil makeup system,local stop
start controls and associated wiring,switches,sending units,governors,etc.
These units are interconnected with a separate switchgear container which incor
porates the circuit breakers for each generator output as well as all unit and
system control and monitoring equipment.
Plant air supply is furnished by two Quincy Model 310 air compressors.
Each unit is driven by a G399
generator.The engines have
aftercooler cooling systems.
to remote radiators.
The
-2~-
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES
An Initial Study has been included herein as Appendix A.As can be seen from
the evaluation,there are three areas of potential environmental impacts as
follows:
Air Emissions The facility will meet all applicable air quality regula
tions.The project’s proponents,O’Brien Energy Systems,will be required
to obtain a “Permit to Construct”and a “Permit to Operate”from the South
Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMO).In the event the company
is unable to obtain said permits,the facility will not be installed.
Since it is proposed at no cost to the Districts,there will be no
expenditure of public funds.
The facility will incorporate Best Available Control Technology.Emission
levels are below emission offset thresholds for all the criteria
pollutants;therefore,no offsets are required.Emission modeling and
health risk assessment has been performed (to demonstrate that air quality
standards will not be violated),and submitted to the SCAQMD.
Noise The facility is “residential”quiet.The noise generating sources
will be mitigated to prevent adverse effects on the environment.The
Orange County Noise Standards will be met.As mitigation,each
engine—generator set will include an individual noise attenuation container
and engine exhaust silencing equipment.
Use of Fuel Energy The facility will be fueled by digester gas,a
byproduct of anaerobic digestion in sewage treatment,which is currently
being flared to the atmosphere.Since the facility will be generating
power from a product currently being wasted to the atmosphere and will sell
that power to the Districts at 75%of the avoided cost of electricity’
purchased from Southern California Edison,the net impact on the
environment will be positive through the utilization of a wasted resource
and the resultant need to purchase less power from Edison.
—3—
FINDINGS
The areas of air emissions,noise and fuel usage are being adequately mitigated
and the project will not~have a significant long term effect on the environment.
-4-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA
December 29,1987 IO844ELUSAVENUE
p.o.aox 8127
-FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
(714)962.2411
PUBLIC NOTICE
TO ALL PARTIES CONCERNED:
SUBJECT:Notice of Preparation of Negative Declaration re Interim Biogas
Power Generation Facility at Treatment Plant No.2 (Project TP—1)
The County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6 7,11,13 and 14 of Orange
County,California have determined to prepare a Negative Declaration for an
Interim Biogas Power Generation Facility at Treatment Plant No.2 located in
Huntington Beach,California (Project TP—1).
As required under Sections 15070 and 15073 of the State Guidelines Implementing
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,as amended,this °Notice of
Preparation”declares that the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
having reviewed an Initial Study of the project and having found that the
project will not have a significant effect on the environment,have prepared,
and the Boards of Directors will consider the adoption of a Negative
Declaration for subject project on February 10,1988,at 7:30 p.m.,in the
Districts’administrative offices at 10844 Ellis Avenue,Fountain Valley,
California.
If you have any questions,please contact the undersigned at the above address
and telephone number.If you wish to coninent,please respond by January 20,
1988.
Is!Thomas M.Dawes
Thomas M.Dawes
Director of Engineering
—5—
COuNTY SANITATION OISTRIC
of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
P.O.BOX 9127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8
(714)9624411
INITIAL STUDY
-
(To Be Completed by Lead Agency)
I.Background
A.Name of Proponent O’Brien Energy Systems
B.Address and Phone Number of Proponent
_________________________________
517 North Mountain Avenue,Suite 128
Upland,California 91786 Telephone:714/946—56.11
C.Contact Person Richard Ontiveros
D.Title and Location of Project Interim Biogas Power Generation
Facility;Orange County Sanitation Districts
Treatment Plant No.2
22212 Brookhurst Street
Huntington Beach,CA 92646
E.Description of Project 1200 kilowatt electric generation facility
to utilize digester gas as fuel in internal combustion recipro
cating engines driving electrical generators.The electricity
generated will be used at the Orange County Sanitation Districts’
Plant at a rate discounted from utility company rates.(See
attached.)
—6—
II.Guidelines
A.Does the proposed activity qualify as a project as defined in Section 28.
Yes X No
_____
(If activity does not qualify as project,do not complete remainder of
form).
B.Does the project qualify as:
1.Ministerial (Section 6)Yes
____
No X
2.Emergency (Section 13)Yes
____
No X
3.A feasibility or planning study (Section 33)Yes
____
No X
4.Categorically exempt pursuant to Article 8 of the State Guidelines
(Section 40)Yes
____
No x
5.Involves another agency which constitutes the lead agency
(Section 36)Yes
____
No x If yes,identify lead agency:
(If yes has been checked for any of the above,an Environmental Impact
Assessment/Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration need
not be prepared).
III.Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all uyesh and ~maybe”answers are required on attached sheet~
Yes Maybe No
A.Earth.Will the proposal result in:
1.Unstable earth conditions or in changes.
in geologic substructures?
.
________
X
2.Disruptions,displacements,compaction
or overcovering of the soil?
.
X
3.Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
____
x
4.The destruction,covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical features?
________
X
5.Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soils,either on or off the site?
________
X
-7—
Yes Maybe No
6.Changes in desposition or erosion of beach
sands or changes in silation,deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel
of a river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay,inlet or lake?
7.Exposure of people or property to geological
hazards such as earthquakes,landslides,
mudslides,ground failure or similar -
hazard?
________
X
B.Air.Will the proposal~result in:
1.Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
________
X
2.The creation of objectionable odors?
________
X
3.Alteration of air movement,moisture or
temperature or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally?
________
x
C.Water..Will the proposal result in:
I.Change in currents or the course of
direction of water movements in either
marine or fresh water?
________
X
2.Changes in absorption rates,drainage
patterns or the rate and amount of
surface runoff?
____
X
3.Alterations to the course of flow of
flood waters?
________
X
4.Change in the amount of surface water
in any water body?
________
X
5.Discharge into surface waters or in any
alteration of surface water quality,
including,but not limited to,temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
________
X
6.Alteration of the direction or rate
o.f flow of ground waters?
________
X
7.Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or
withdrawals,or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
__________
X
—8—
Yes Maybe No
8.Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
________
X
9.Exposure of people or property to related
hazards such as flooding or tidal waves?
________
X
D.Plant Life.Will proposal result in:
1.Change in the diversity of species or
numbers of any species of plants (including
trees,shrubs,grass,crops and aquatic
plants)?
________
x
2.Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of plants?
________
X
3.Introduction of new species of plants into
an area or in a barrier to the normal
replenishment of existing species?
________
X
4.Reduction in acreage of any agriculture
crop?
________
X
E.Animal Life.Will proposal result in:
1.Change in the diversity of species or
numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals including reptiles,fish
and shellfish,benthic organisms or
insects?
__________
X
2.Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals?
________
X
3.Introduction of new species of animals
into an area or result in a barrier to
the migration or movement of animals?
________
X
4.Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?X
F.Noise.Will the proposal result in:
1.Increase in existing noise levels?
________
X
2.Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
________
X
G.Light and Glare.Will the proposal produce
light or glare?
________
X
—9—
Yes Maybe No
H.Land Use.Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
________
X
I..Natural Resources.Wfll the proposal result in:
1.Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources?
________
X
2.Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
________
X
J.Risk of Upset.Will the proposal involve:
1.A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including,but not
limited to,oil,pesticides,chemicals
or radiation)in the event of an accident
or upset conditions?
________
X
2.Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan?
________
X
K.Population.Will the proposal alter the
location,distribution,density or growth
rate of the human population of an area?
____
X
L.Housing.Will the proposal affect existing
housing or create a demand for additional
housing.
________
X
M.Transportation/Circulation.Will the proposal
result in:
1.Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
________
S
X
2.Effects on existing parking facilities
or demand for new parking?
________
X
3.Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
________
X
4.Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods?
__________
X
5.Alterations to waterborne,rail or air
S
traffic?
________
X
—10—
Yes Maybe No
6.Increase .in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles,bicyclists or ~pedestrians?
________
X
N.Public Services.Will the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or
altered governmental services in any of the
following areas:
1.Fire protection?
________
X
2.Police protection?
________
X
3.Schools?
________
X
4.Parks or other recreational facilities?
________
X
5.Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
________
X
0.Energy.Will the proposal result in:
1.Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
_____
2.Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources of energy or require
the development of new sources of energy?
________
X
P.Utilities.Will the proposal result in a need
for new systems or substantial alterations to
the following utilities:
1.Power or natural.gas?
________
X
2..Communications systems?
________
X
3.Water?
________
X
4.Sewer or septic tanks?
________
X
5.Storm water drainage?
________
X
6.Solids waste and disposal?
________
X
Q.Human Health.Will the proposal result in:
1.Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health?)
________
X
—11—
Yes Maybe No
2.Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
________
x
R.Aesthetics.Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open
to the public or will the proposal result in
the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to the public view?
________
x
S..Recreation.Will the proposal result in an
impact upon the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
________
X
1.Cultural Resources.
1.Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric
or historic archeaological site?
________
X
2.Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure or object?
________
X
3.Does the proposal have the potential to
cause a physical change which would
affect unique ethnic cultural values?
________
X
4.Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
________
X
U.Mandatory Findings of Significance.
1.Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species,cause a fish
or wildlife population to drop below
self—sustaining levels,threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal,
or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or
prehistory?.X
—12—
Yes Maybe No
2.Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term,to the disadvantage of
long—term,environmental goals?(A short-
term impact on the environment is one which
occurs in a relatively brief,definitive
period of time,while long—term impacts
will endure well into the future).
________
X
3.Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited but cumulative
considerable?(A project may impact on
two or more separate resources where the
impact on each resource is relatively
small,but where the-effect of the total
of those impacts on the environment is
significant).
________
x
4.Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
________
X
IV.Discussion of Environmental Evaluation
See attached sheet.(S~:~UiIBIT “C”)
V.Discussion of Zoning Compatibility
Installation will be located at an existing sewage treatment plant.
VI.Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment,there will not be
a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added
to the project.A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.XXX
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect
on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required.
Date:A~”c /t~)/~‘2 COUNT~~-1~TATION D ICTS OF
ORAN$’E O~4TY
Th~s M.D~es~
-13—Director ~f Engineering
EXPLANATION OF “YES”ANSWERS ON INITIAL STUDY
for Interim Biogas Power Generation Facility
O’Brien Energy Systems
4
Item III.0.1.Use of Fuel Energy
The facility will be fueled by digester gas (a byproduct of the anaerobic
digestion at the wastewater treatment plant).As such,this is a “Qualifying
Facility”as regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,pursuant to
the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978,as amended.
E~(HIBIT “A”to Initial Study
—14—
CEQA Review for Interim Biogas Power Generation Facility
O’Brien Energy Systems
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
O’Brien Energy Systems will install and operate a nominal 1200 kilowatt power
generating facility,designed to operate on approximately 400 scfm of 60%
methane digester gas (600 scfm is the minimum gas quantity available from the
Orange County Sanitation Districts’Treatment Plant No.2).
The facility will include two engine—generation units.Each unit will consist
of a Caterpillar Model G399 internal combustion engine,and a 650 kilowatt
generator.All of the engines have closed loop,remote radiator cooling systems
for engine jacket water,lubricating oil cplling,and turbo—charge aftercooler.
Digester gas will be supplied to the facility at 35 psig (the pressure needed
for supply to the engines).Fuel filters will be installed.Each
engine—generator unit is packaged in a container;including engine(s),
generator,lube oil cooler,aftercooler,associated piping,controls and
miscellaneous accessories.The system and individual unit switchgear and
electrical protection system is in a separate container.
The facility will operate 24 hours per day,seven days per week,52 weeks per
year,except for necessary maintenance.
EXHIBIT “B”to Initial Study
—15—
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Name of Project:Interim Biogas Power Generation Facility at
Orange County Sanitation Districts’Treatment
Plant No.2 in Huntington Beach,California
Location:22212 Brookhurst Street
Huntington Beach,California
Entity or Person Undertaking Project:
A.District
______________________________________________
B.Other —Energy Systems
Staff Determination:
The Districts’staff,having undertaken and completed an Initial Study of
this project in accordance with Section 15063 of the Amendments to the
California Environmental Quality Act,for the purpose of ascertaining
whether the proposed project might have significant effect on the
environment,has reached the following conclusion:
X 1.The project will not have a significant long term effect on
the environment because of the mitigation measures
incorporated;therefore,a Negative Declaration can be
prepared.
_____
2.The project could have a significant effect on the
environment;therefore,an EIR will be required.
________
•
S____________
Date homas M.Dawes
Director of Engineering
EcHIBIT “C”to Initial Study
—16—
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
)SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I,RITA J.BROWN,Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.88-15 was
passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Boards on the 10th day of
February,1988,by the following vote,to wit:
AYES:Margaret M.Arnold,Ben Bay,Roland E.Bigonger,A.B.“Buck”
Catlin,John C.Cox,Jr.,Norman E.Culver,Richard B.Edgar,
Don R.Griffin,Dan Griset,Robert Hanson,Evelyn Hart,Ronald
B.Hoesterey,Ursula E.Kennedy,William D.Mahoney,Philip
Maurer,Tom Mays,Darryl G.Miller,J.Todd Murphy,James Neal,
Arthur G.Newton,Bob Perry,Richard T.Polis,Don R.Roth,Sal
Sapien,J.R.“Bob”Siefen,Wayne SilzeI,Don E.Smith,Roger
R.Stanton,Charles E.Sylvia,James A.Wahner,Grace Winchell,
Edna Wilson
NOES:None
ABSENT:Gene A.Leyton,Sally Anne Miller,Carrey J.Nelson,John H.
Sutton
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official
seal of County Sanitation District No.1 on behalf of itself and Districts
Nos.2,3,5,6,7,11,13 and 14 of Orange County,California,this 10th day
of February,1988.
Rita J.Brown,ecretary
Boards of Directors,County
Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,
6,7,11,13 and 14 of Orange County,
California