Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 1987 - 0093I RESOLUTION NO.87-93-7 APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARMYION RE NORTH AIRPORT DIVERSION SEWER,CONTRACT NO.7-10,. AND SOUTH AIRPORT DIVERSION SEWER,CONTRACT NO.7—10—1 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND INCORPORATING CERTAIN MITIGATION MEASURES RE NORTH AIRPORT DIVERSION SEWER,CONTRACT NO.7-10 AND SOUTH AIRPORT DIVERSION SEWER,CON~PRACT NO.7-10-1,PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF AND DIRECTING FILING OF A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County,California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE,DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1 That the projects concerning which this determination is made are described as follows: Construction of a 18—inch gravity sewer in Business Center Drive between Von Karman Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard; and construction of future sewer between MacArthur Boulevard and Von Karman Avenue in Campus Drive. Section 2 That an Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment,which said assessment is attached hereto as Exhibit hAlt,of the environmental effects of said projects have been undertaken and completed by the District,and the results thereof have been reviewed by this Board;and, Section 3 That based on the findings of the Initial Study, this Board determines that the proposed projects could have a significant effect on the environment,but there will not be a significant effect because of the mitigation measures described within the Negative Declaration which is attached hereto as Exhibit “B”;and, Section 4 That said Negative Declaration has been circulated for public review for a period from June 11,1987 to June 26,1987,during which time the following comments were received on the document: A.Orange County Transit District,June 22,1987 (Commented relative to maintaining lanes on Campus Drive during construction.) Section 5 That this Board hereby notes all comments received on the North Airport Diversion Sewer and South Airport Diversion Sewer Negative Declaration;and, Section 6 That,for reasons set forth in said Exhibit “A” and in accordance with the mitigation measures incorporated in Exhibit “B”and by this Resolution,it is hereby found that said projects will not have a significant effect on the environment and,therefore,the Board hereby approves the Negative Declaration regarding the environmental impacts of said projects; and, Section 7 That the Secretary be,and is hereby, authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution,the aforesaid Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment and the Negative Declaration at the District’s office to be available for public inspection and copying;and, Section 8 That the Secretary be,and is hereby,authorized and directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,as amended. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 8,1987. FILED In the Office of the Secretary County Sanitation District N JUN 10 1987 Name of Project:NORTH AIRPORT DIVERSION SEWER,Cont.7-10 SOUTH AIRPORT DIVERSION SEWER,Cont.7—10—1 Location:North —in Business Center Drive and private easements south and adjacent to 405 freeway; South -in Campus Drive,both in the City of Irvine Entity or Person Undertaking Project: A.District: B.Other: County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange county Staff Determination: The District’s staff,having undertaken and completed an Initial Study.of this project in accordance with Section 15063 of the Amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act, for the purpose of ascertaining whether the proposed project might have a significant effect on the environment,has reached the following conclusion: xx 1.The project will not have a significant long term effect on the environment because of the mitigation measures incorporated;therefore,a Negative Declaration can be prepared. 2.The project could have a significant effect on the environment;therefore,an EIR will be required. June 3,1987 Date 0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT COUNTY SANITATiON DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY.CALIFORNIA 10844 EWS.AVENUE P.O.B0X~127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFOPNIA 92728.8127 (714)962.2411 DATEPOSTED uune ~i~o DATE RNAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O.~OX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 02728.8127 10844 ELLiS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 02708-7018 (714)962-2411 NEGATIVE DECLARATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act,County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County has conducted an Initial Study to determine whether the following project may have a significant adverse effect on the environment and on the basis of that study hereby finds: Although the proposed project could have a significant adverse effect on the environment,there will not be a significant adverse effect in this case because the Mitigation Measures described on the reverse side of this sheet have been added to the project.An Environmental Impact Report is not required. The environmental documents which constitute the Initial Study and provide the basis and reasons for this determination are attached and hereby made a part of this document. PROJECT: North Airport Diversion Sewer (Contact No.7—10)and :South Airport Diversion Sewer (Contract No.7-10-1 File No: ____________ Location:John Wayne Airport,Orange County Descriptiorr Rerouting of the South Irvine Subtrunk through a new sewer line easterly along Btsiness Center Drive to the Von Karman Trunk Sewer,and the rerouting of the MacArthur Trunk Sewer to a new sewer line along Campus Drive to the Von Karman Trunk Sewer.The existing lines will be decommissioned. Lead Agency:County Sanitation DistrIct No.7 of Orange County Address:•10844 EllIs,Fountain Valley,CalIfornia 92708—7018 Contact Person:Project:Thomas M.Dawes Telephone:(962-2411 Environmental:Thomas M.Dawes Telephone:(962-2411 NOTICE: This document and supporting attachments are provided for review by the general public.This is an information document about environmental effects only.Supplemental information is on file and may be reviewed in the Ot~ico listed above.The decision-making body will review this document and potentially many other sources of infor mation before considering the proposed project. This Negative Declaration may become final unless written comments or an appeal is received by the office Usted above by 4:30 p.m.on June 26,1987 .it you wish to appeal the appropriateness or adequacy of this do~uthent,address your written comments to our finding that the project will have a significant adverse effect on the environment:(1)identify the environmental effect(s),why they would r,and why they would be significant,and (2)suggest any mitigation measures which you believe would eliminate duce the effect to an acceptable level.Regarding item (1)above,explain the.basis for your comments and submit any supporting data or references. Dated:~/ / COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)982-2411 Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1 970,the following environmentél analysis was prepared to determine whether the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 1.~-WILT.19!PROPOSAl.P2501.?1W OR HE Arr~.~HY~ A.BATE? 1)UMSTAHLE HARTS ~IDITIONS OW IN CHJIGHE IN GHOLOGIC 50~ROCTUR~7 2)EXPOSURE 0?PEOPLE OR PRO~~xTT 10 CHOLOCIC !AZ7.RV5 SUCH AS WARTS— Q0A~•LMID~.IO~•PIUDST.IDHS, G~HO TAILOR!,OR SIMILM IAWAPDS? 3.TJJIDPOHE IL?P2AT!OW ~)~JIC!TN TOPOGRAPHY OR C~HO su~cz R~Z~PEATUREX? 2)192 DiWCTION,OOV!RX1IG,OR HODIPICATION OR MIT UNIQUE GEOLOGIC OR PHYSICAl.TZATUR~? C.CHANGE 1)1 D~0SITIOW OR EXOSION 01 REACH SANDS,OR CHANG~IN SZLTA— ?ION.D~OSI?ION OR ~OSIOR WHICH IIAX HODIFY 19!CHM1N~.0?A RIV~OR STREAM OR 19!RED 0?THE UC!AN OR Mi!HAY,TNT.!?OR LAX!? 2.211 —WILT.Ill!PROPOSAL RESULT TNt A.INCRZASEO AIR D(ISSIONS OR 0!?!- *XORA?IOK OR MIDIEX?AIR QUALITY REYQID PROJICTION 3!19!S~J1W OOAS? ?4R QU7~LI?f MMU,G~4mT FLAIl. B.EXPOSURE 0?P!R~1S TO Z~ALLY ~.EV*TEO L!V~.S 0?AIR POLLUTION? C.19!CREATION 0?OBJ~TZONABL! ODORS? H.AL?EPMIOII 0?AIR HOV~IT. HOISTURE OR 104P!RATUR!,OR ANT C!AMC!Ill CLTMAT!•EIT!~LOCALLY (AD.7ACDI?10 PHO3~T)OR R~IONALLY (III ODCtrrY)? 3.~-WILT.lEE PROPOSAl.~0L? A.CHMGEX 1)1 CURATSIS.01 TEE ODORS!OR D!R~T1OW 0?WA?!W MOVE IN EITHRE 11221)1!OR FRESH WArnS? 1.CHAliCES IN ABSORPTION RATES, DRAINAGE FAlTERS,~SIOtt OR TEE RAT!210 flIT 0?SURP?C!WAlER C.MT TICREASE IN 11110 OR WATER ~SIOW 0?SOILS,EITSEX ON OR B.~NCZ 1)1 TEE AI~71l?0?SURFACE WA~III ANY WAlER HOOT? !.DISCHA~!INTO SURFACE WATERS, 01 TN ANY ALTERATION 0?SURFACE— WATER QUALITY,INCWDIIIO SOT tO? T.XMITES TO TEXPERATURE,DISSOLVES OXTOI,OR TURBIDITY? P.ALTERATION OF 192 DIR~?IOII OR RATE 0?FLOW OF C~fl0 WATERS? C.CHANCE 1)1 THE QUM11ITY OW QUAL ITY 0?C1~$1ID WATERS,EITHER ThROUGH DIN~?ASDITIOWS OR WDIIIDRAIIALS •OR 19ROOCE INT!RO~?IO?1 0?121 AQUIFER BY CUTS OR EXCAVATIONS? I.EXPOSURE OP PEOPLE OR PROPERTY TO WAT!R-REI.ATES 521.2209 SUCH AS FLOODING OR TIDAL WAVES? 4.BIOLOGICAL ~—WILL TEE PROPOSAL RZSUZ.T ZN, A.~NGE 11(19!DIVERSITY OP SF!— CIES,CHAlICE OR D!T!RIORATIOII 0? FLORA AND FAUNA HABITAT •CHANCE Ill 19!NU)IDER 0?ANY SPECIES 0?PLANTS OR MIIMALS,INTRODUCTION 0?NEX SPECIES 0?PLANTS OR ANIMALS INTO MI AREA,OR IwrROcuCTzON 0?A BARRIER TO 19!HO~4AL R~LVI!SW43I?OR MIGRATION OF EXISTING SPECIES? I.R25OCTION 0?THE NTYS~RS OF MIT UNIQUE,AESTHETICALLY SIGNIFICANT, 112!OR ERDMGERES SPECIES 0?PLANTS OR ANIMALS? 5.ODLTURAL/&~.i.~vr~P’IC ~— WILL 19!PROPOSAL RESULT IN AN ALT!EXATION OF A SIGNIFICANT AACEA! OLOGICAL.OR HISTORICAl.SI?!,STRUC TURE,OB3IC?,OR BUILDING,PALEON— !OWGICAL SI?!,OR OTHER IMPORTANT CULTURAZISC!ERTII’IC RESOWC!? y 6.A~r~tnriCH —WILT.TUE PROPOSAL —RESULT IN TUE OROTRUCTIOW 0?ANT SCESIC VISTA OR VI!ll OPER 10 19! PUBLIC,OR WILT.1!!PROPOSAL RESULT IN 19!CREATION 0?Ml AESTHETICALLY OT?ERSIVE SIT!OPOI TO PUBLIC VI~l? 7.~—WILL TEE PROPOSAL X RESULT IN, A.05!0?AMID~(AZL!SIGN APOUWPS OF FUBL OR W~Y? X B.ISCREAS!DB4MID UPON ERISTING ——SOOSCES 0?0l~!,OR R~UIRZ 19! D!VEI.OI~ODI?0?HER SDU~ES 0? x — S.LAND ~—WILL 19!PROPOSAl. RESULT IM~ x —A.~l?L2C?WITS ZONING OR CERERAL PLAN DESICXATIOWPQLXCIES FOR TB! PROPERTY? YES MAY19 HO ——-L x x x x x x x _L _L x x x x x x x x C/) 4 __1. 1.~iYLIC?W?!W ~CD~?,UTS?— IRO,OR PWJ*I~LAID D~S7 C.fl~OCW~IT 0?UREMI C~lTE, IWCWDZNO POPUlATION AID !~3S!)P3 BEYDID PRO3~~C~TE LEV~.8? — D.VU.!.PROPOSAL ~UL?IN CONVER 51015 OP VPIWAEZ2 AGRICULTURAL LAID 50 D!VUOPNDS?? — I.VT!.!.PROPOSAL PR~!~DE NATURM. ~IC!UTEACTIOII? — ~•TRMI5PO~kTOP/~.,L~ULarr~— IV!PROPOSAL RESULT INs A.O~5ERAT!OR 0?ADDIrIOIOJ.VER!CU.. LA!)IDVD~IT ~T0ID P~IOiU.L MIALESIS. — P.~75..-i1 05 UISTflID PRRXflID PACILITIES,OR D~IAND SO! PAERDID7 C.VGAC?01051 ERTS?T1~OR fl.MNIIV TP.MSPORTA?IOI5 SYSTVSS? — 0.ALTER PRESVS?PA?1VRNS 0?CITCU— LATION OR )OVIVIVT 0?PEOPLE ?*ID/OR GOORS? — V.ALTER WATERROIDSE,N?.!!.,OR MR TRA7?1C7 P.?RA7?TC EAIARDS 10 ~0ESTRIMlS, )IDTOR VECICLES,BIC!CLISTS,OR P~ESTRIA2IS? C.OREATION 0?INTERNAL CIICULMION PROBL~5S7 10.~ST05 —III!.!.NE PROPOSAL RESULT IN MI D(PACT UPON IS!QUALITY OR QUPRTITY 0?ERISTING R~!ATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES? ~.IC ~.LTE AID SAPET —WILL TEE PROPOSAL, A.INPOLVE IS!RIEX 0?ERP!OS!OR OR 151 R~.EASE OP UAZAID~S SOESTANCES, IWCWDING OIL,PESTICIDES,~lICAL, OR RADIATION IN TEE EVDIT 0?Ml ACCID~1T OR UPSET C0DIT!OSIS? B.ERPOS!PERSONS OR PROPER?!TO WI!DLMD TIRE HAZARDS? C.I~W PRZVI~JS USE OP TEE PROPERTY ERPOSE PERSONS WRO MA! ~CUPT IV!SITE 10 EAZAPD~S SUB— STANCES •ISCWDIWG 10?lID?r.INrr~ TO OIL,PESTICIDES,~IICALS OR RADIATION? 0.DOES TEE P~?PLACE PRESDIT OR FUTURE SUR7O.TIDING RESID~I?3 AT NINA 0?EXPOSURE TO TOXIC OR RADIO ACTIVE GAS,DCP!.OSIOISS OR I)DUS?R!AL FIRE? 1.~tD IV!PROPOSAL T1?IVR?NE luTE NI D~C~CY ~PONSR PLJJI OR XVACUATZON PWfl P.I~tD 111 PROJECT US!OR DISPOS! 0?POTIVTIALLY EAZAIDOUS MATERIAL3 SUOR AS TOXIC SUESTANCES,FLAISSADLE OR ~PL0SIVES? 2.2.~—WILL TEE PROPOSAL RESULT flit S~(ER OR S~?IC TAXRS STO~(WATER DRAINAGE J.SOLID WASTE AND DISPOSAL V.OTSER SERVICES is. _______ YES MATES lID x x x x x x —-~ x x x x x x —--I x x x ——-I x x x x x A.VROP.NASE OP ERISTI1ID ROtS! LEV~.S? B.ERPOSURE OP PEOPLE ¶0 ROtS! X.EVPLS IN EXcESS 0?~UCl?T! SIMIDARES? 13.LION?AID —WILL TEE PROPOSAl. PRODUCE NEW LIGHT OR GLARE? 14.PUN.IC ~vr~AID HT!Lt~TRE - WI!.!.THE PROPOSAL CREATE TEE NETS 10!NEW FACILITIES OR ¶5!UTTSSION OP EXISTING FACILITIES WHICH WWLD 1kV!ADVERSE P5151CM.IMPACTS? A.TIP.!PROTECTION B.POLICE PROTECTION C.s~or3 0.PARIS MID OTNER RECREATION FACILITIES V.POlES OR NATURAL GAS P.~p05UNICXIIONS STSTURS C.WATER V. I. x x ——-x x *.oo~.~PROJECT HAVE TN POTENTIAl.10 S!GMOE TN ~3A!.11~Y 0?TN VIID1NNT,SUSSTSJITW.LT YTS MAThS NO j NWC!ITS MANIlA?0?A !1SH OR WtL.Cl.!PE POPULATIOS TO DROP S!!~SZ1?-SUSTAIN!WG LZVEI.S,IIINAIVI TO ELIMINATE A PlANT OR ANIMAl.~e(INITV.NDU~TN )&H~t*OR ~TRZC?TN MN(~0?A Ml! DIORN~~D PLAPS?OR ANIMAl.OR E!.IWINATE DOORTANT EXAI5~.ES 0?TN MASOR PE*IO~0?CM.!P05111A IlSIORT OR PNIIISTORT7 0 F INDINGS S.01ES H~PROJECT HAVE TN POft)1TZAI.TO ACHIEVE SHORT—T!511.TO 110 DISADVANTAS!0?5.0.0-15*. ~-‘~~~~IS 04!WHIOl ~URO IN A SRI!?.Dt?11IITIVE PERIOO 0?11)0 WHIZ.!La.G-1E*IP~ACTS Will.ENW)0 WEll.INTO TN ?~flV~.) .1 C.TOES 110 PROjECT hAVE DOACTS 5111105 AN TNOTVIDWhU.Y LIMITED,BUT CWVLA?IV!LY C0.0TOCMSLZ7 ~A PROJ~NAT DOACP 01 150 OR ION SEPARATE NSOU~T~WN)0 1)0 DOAC?01 EAQI ~CU~!IS NLATIVE!.T SMALL.317?WHEN TN !?TWT OP TN TOTAl.0?THOR!DOACTS 01 110 !)NI~00W1 IS II01IPICAWT.) • B.TOES 1131 PROJECT NAVE OIVI~0DITA5.EFFECTS %IflOI WILL CAUSE SUSSlANTIAL APJENE sr~tS 01 501AM B!IN~.!ITN*OINC?LT OR INOINCTLY? ~_~. 1JETERMIKATION: 04 THE BA~1S Or THIS DIZTLAL EVAWATIOI, ________ I P1110 TN PROPORTS PROJECT ~UZ.D NO?HAVE A SI0II?ICAII?EFFECT 01 1131 ENVIMPIPON?.AID A ,31CATIVE ORCIARATIOI WILL B!PNPA~. X I FillS THAT ALTIIO1~1 TN PROPOR!D PROJECT COUlD NAVE A S!OII?!CANT E?F!C?01 1)0 O4Vt~n31NT.TSSN WILL NO?BE A SIOIIPICAW?EFFECT IN THIS CASE BECAUSE 1131 WITICATT01 )0ASUJES DESCRIBED 01 AN A?T~CHED SHEET NAVE B~ADORD TO TN PROJECT.A lOCATIVE DECIAHATIOI WIll.BE PNPAND. ________ I FIND TN PRO~ED PROJECT MAT 11kv!A S1O4I?ICAW?EFFECT 01 TN EWVIROI)OWT.AIlS All DN1~øDrrkI.DOACT ~OO IS NOU1~. - Dii.1 ‘yi~’’~~r’‘~_~ Project Proposal and Background The proposed project involves the abandonment of the South Irvine Subtrunk Sewer (extension of Michelson Drive Subtrunk Sewer)and the portion of the MacArthur Trunk Sewer,westerly of MacArthur Boulevard;and Redirection of Flows to the North Airport Diversion Sewer (Contract No.7-10)and South Airport Diversion Sewer (Contract No.7—10-1). Project Background - Both lines are presently located within the John Wayne Airport (JWA)property boundaries.These lines service JWA and the area west from Von Karman Avenue and Birch Street to MacArthur Boulevard and Campus Drive.Currently,both trunk lines are intercepted downstream by the Gisler-Redhill Trunk Sewer.The South Irvine Subtrunk and MacArthur Trunk sewers are both owned by the County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County. The approved Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities for the County Sanitation Districts depicts sewer flows from the MacArthur Trunk and South Irvine Subtrunk to be redirected from their confluence with the Gisler-Redhill Trunk to the Main Street Pump Station.The rerouting of these flows is to provide relief to the Gisler-Redhill Trunk. On February 26,1985,the Orange County Board of Supervisors adopted the Master Improvement Plan for JWA.The JWA Master Plan proposes the construction of a terminal building and parking structure directly above the existing South Irvine Subtrunk easement,thereby precluding service access to the trunk line.JWA has requested the County Sanitation District relocate the South Irvine Subtrunk sewer prior to the initiation of construction of the terminal and parking structure. The County Sahitation Districts have agreed with JWA’s request.Additionally,the Districts are interested in relocating the MacArthur Trunk Sewer that runs dia gonally across the JWA property because of the difficulty associated with servicing. Therefore,the relocation of the sewer lines off of the JWA property is being treated as one project,although possibly separated into two separate construction efforts. —1— EXHIBIT B—4 - Project Analysis The 1982 Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers Facilities,as amended,proposes the rerouting of the South Irvine Subtrunk Sewer northerly and westerly along the south side of the San Diego Freeway.The MacArthur Trunk Sewer would remain live across the airport to their confluence where the proposed master sewer would cross the freeway and convey the combined flows to the Main Street Pump Station. However,the proposed project provides a less costly route and would not require a new crossing of the San Diego Freeway. The MacArthur Trunk flows would be rerouted through a new sewer line along Campus Drive,and discharging into the existing Von Karman Trunk at Von Karman Avenue.From the Von Karman Trunk,rerouted flows will travel north to intercept with the Main Street Trunk,and then proceed west toward the Main Street Pump Station (see attached exhibit). The South Irvine Subtrunk flows would be rerouted through a new sewer line easterly along Business Center Drive,then extending by easements through two privately owned parcels to an existing manhole on the Von Karman Trunk Sewer.From the Von Karman Trunk,rerouted flows will travel north and intercept with the Main Street Subtrunk,and then proceed west toward the Main Street Pump Station.The proposed South Irvine Subtrunk route will require easements through the Irvine Company and Parker-Hannifin Corporation property.However,both easements will be along existing parking areas or landscaped portions of existing parking areas.The required easements will not eliminate any parking spaces or permanently disrupt existing circulation patterns. The abandonment of the MacArthur Sewer involves the construction of a sewer line from the Von Karman Trunk Sewer,located at Von Karman Avenue and Campus Drive,westerly to the existing airport service facilities,intercepting existing ser vices and City of Newport Beach,and County of Orange service connections without interruption.The existing MacArthur Trunk Sewer will bfle decommissioned and the existing Campus Subtrunk Sewer will be abandoned. —2— EXHIBIT B-5 Source:County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. Relocation of MacArthur Trunk And South Irvine Subtrunk John Wayne Airport Orange County EXHIBIT B—6 Legend EXISTING SEWER LINES The proposed relocation of the MacArthur Trunk and South Jrvine Subtrunk will not alter present or proposed service,capacities.The existing MacArthur Trunk line and South Irvine Subtrunk line will remain underground in an idle state except for providing sewer servicing capacities to the airport terminal.Relocation of the South Irvine Subtrunk Sewer is anticipated to be initiated in 1987.The MacArthur Trunk Sewer will be relocated in approximately 3 to 5 years. -3- EXHIBIT B—7 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST EXPLANATIONS The following is an analysis of the project’s environmental impacts,as indicated on the attached environmental analysis checklist.An explanation of the impact deter mination is provided for each analysis topic.If a potential impact has been identified,a mitigation measure that reduces the impact to a level of no significance is provided. 1.Earth Resources Explanation Implementation of the proposed project will require limited grading and landform alteration.The proposed trunk routes are located within areas that are presently developed;therefore,no significant earth resource impacts are associated with the project. 2.b Air Explanation The proposed project will not,generate any additional air emissions that will reduce the level of air quality within the project area.The use of construction vehicles and equipment may affect ambient air quality,however these impacts are not anticipated to be significant. 3.b.c Water Explanation The project area is presently developed.Therefore,no long—term impacts are anticipated.The existing drainage system may experience minor disruption during construction,but the level of disruption is not expected to be signifi cant.~Dewatering devices may be employed during construction of the proposed facilities.Water from dewatering activities may be discharged to the existing flood control system. Mitigation Any dewatering required during construction will comply with the California Water Quality Control Board standards. 1 EXHIBIT B—8 4.Biological Resources S Explanation The proposed project involves the placement of sewer trunk lines under existing paved roadway surfaces or landscaped medians.There are no significant bio logical resource impacts. 5.Cultural/Scientific Resources Explanation The proposed trunk routes will be located within areas that are presently developed.Because of the disturbed nature of the route locations and limited surface grading,the probability of discovery of cultural resources is small. Should cultural resources be discovered during construction,a qualified archaeologist/paleontologist shall be notified and site-specific mitigation measures be developed and implemented as appropriate. 6.Aesthetics Explanation The proposed project involves the placement of sewer trunk lines under existing paved roadway surfaces or landscaped medians.There are no aesthetic impacts associated with the project.All removed landscaping during project con struction shall be replaced. 7.Energy Explanation Implementation of the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts on existing energy sources or create additional demand for energy use. 8.Land Use Explanation The proposed trunk lines will be constructed under existing highways.Imple mentation of the project will not have any significant land use impacts.The proposed South Irvine Subtrunk route will require easements through The Irvine Company and Parker Hannifin Corporation property.However,both easements will be along existing parking areas or landscaped portions of parking areas. The required easements will not eliminate any parking spaces or permanently disrupt existing circulation patterns. 2 EXHIBIT 3—9 9.Transportation/Circulation Explanation Construction impacts associated with the proposed project will result in the. temporary disruption of present circulation patterns. Mitigation Provisions for a safe and continuous passage of local pedestrian and vehicular traffic at all times will be made.Prior to the commencement of work a traffic control plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Irvine.The traf fic control plan shall include measures such as: A.The erecting and maintaining of signing,striping,barricades,temporary signals and other safety measures as directed by the city engineer. B.The covering of existing signing not in conformance with the detour plans for the duration of the detour. C.The relocation of existing stop signs to provide visibility from all relocated traffic lanes. D.The replacement of delineators with barricades equipped with lighting devices at construction areas where an open trench exists and/or where traffic detour will be in existence during night hours. E.Conformance with the guidelines in the Work Area Traffic Control Handbook (WATCH). F.Notification to properties adjoining the construction area in compliance with the City of Irvine standards,if normal access is to be restricted.The notice should include the nature and duration of the restriction. All existing facilities,including signing,striping,signs,markings and markers shall be restored to the original condition and/or location at the end of the construction period. 10.Recreation Explanation The proposed trunk lines will be constructed under existing highways offering no recreational opportunities.Implementation of the project will not have sig nificant impacts on recreation. 3 EXHIBIT B—lU 11.Public Health and Safety Explanation The proposed project is not associated with hazardous substances.Therefore, implementation of the project will not have any significant public health and safety impacts. 12.Noise Explanation Construction-related impacts will include a temporary increase in existing ambient noise levels.However,the increase in noise levels will be in areas located away from noise-sensitive land uses (i.e.residential)and will not be significant. 13.Light and Glare Explanation The proposed project may require onsite lighting if night construction is neces sary.This additional light and glare will be short-term,during construction only.No sensitive uses (e.g.,residential)are in close proximity to the project area;therefore no impacts are anticipated. 14.Public Services and Utilities Explanation The proposed relocation of the Mac Arthur Trunk and South Irvine Subtrunk will reroute existing sewage flows to the Von Karman Trunk Sewer,thus providing needed relief to the Gisler—Redhill Trunk Sewer.The proposed relocations will not impact existing service capacities.County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County’s 1982 Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewer Facilities,as amended,depicts the South Irvine Subtrunk Sewer being rerouted northerly and westerly along the south side of the San Diego Freeway,to be joined by the MacArthur Trunk Sewer,and cross under the freeway to the Main Street Pump Station.The proposed project is a change in routing from what is shown in the District’s master plan. 4 EXHIBIT B—Il Mitigation The Consolidated Master Plan of TrUnk Sewer Facilities should be amended to reflect the proposed rerouting of the facilities to the Main Street Pump Station.No significant impacts are anticipated from the proposed modification to the master plan. 5 EXHIBIT B—12 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. OJUJ~.7rY OF ORA~E I,RITA J.BRC~~1N,Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County,California,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.87-93-7 was passed and adopted at a regular flEeting of said Board on the 8th day of July,1987,by the following vote,to wit: AYES:Richard B.Edgar,Chairmen,John C.Cox,Jr.,Dan Griset,Sally Anne Miller,Don Roth,Don E.Smith,James Wabner NOES:None ABSENT:None IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County,California,this 8th day of July,1987. Rita J.Brown,Secretary Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County,California