HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 1970 - 0017RESOLUTION NO.70-17--7
--
APPROVING REIMEURSEMENT AGREEMENT (NOT MASTER PLAN
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7,OF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIF—
ORNIA,APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A
SEWERAGE FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH
GORDON MAYBEE AND HARRY G.LILJEBLAD
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.
7,of Orange County,California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE,DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1 That the certain Sewerage Facility Reimbursement
Agreement between County Sanitation District No.7,of Orange Cointy,
California,and Gordon Naybee and Harry G.Liljeblad,providing
for reimbursement by the District for Rangeview Drive Extension Sewer,
which said sewerage facility is more particularly described as:
An 8”VCP Sanitary Sewer constructed in Deerhill Drive,
Brier Land,and Rangeview Extension to serve a portion
of Block 15,Irvine Subdivision in the County of Orange,
is hereby approved and accepted;and,
Section 2 That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement
on behalf of the District,in form approved by the General Counsel;
and,
Section 3 That reimbursement in the total amc~nt of
$7,175.37 is hereby authorized to be made in accordance with the
terms and coridit:~ons of said agreement and Schedule tIAtT attached hereto,
from the Facilities Revolving Fund of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 11,1970.
SCHEDULE ~
January 27,1970
1501 Clearview Lane
Santa Aria 92705
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley
California
Mr.Fred A.Harper
General ~anager
Subject:Reimbursement Agreement
Reference:Your letter 9 January 1970
Meeting-Liljeblad-Harper January 27,1970
After carefu~study and condideration of all aspects related to
the reimbursement agreement for I~ieybec/Liljcblad I find I must
advise you that in its’present form it is unacceptable.
As I had discusscd with you in our meeting of January 27,1970,1 find
that the Benefit Summary broakdo~m is most unfair to ~r.~Iayboo
and myself.In view of the fact that we have invested $9,132~31 in
this project over a lengthy and time concuming period of over two
years,we feel more consideration is duo for the investment we are
burdened with.
The main points on which we differ are as follows:
A.The acreage benefit of $200 per acre is not realistic.
In a recent meeting hero in Cowan fleights the homenwncrs
wore advised by the Sanitation District that r~ey ~iou1d
incurr a cost of $3,000 per home if they wantc~a sewer
system.
B.~lo do nt feel that the four homa sites on the downhill
side of our sewor line are a real potentiol for connection
to our system since they will more logically go downhiill
to another new line rather than uphill with a pumping unit.
We therefore ask that the division of the benefit sui~nary be changed
as follows:
1.Include all adjacent property owners fronting on the new
sewer including lots that can install gravity house lateral
via an casement.
2.An uphill lot fronting on the now sewer (full lot asscssrri~’nt)
3.An uphill lot that does not front on the now sower,but
which hcs,or will have,access to the now sowar via a
private house lateral ecsement~(half lot c~sessmont)
SCHEDULE ~Au
The above would mean that full-lot assessr~ients relative to Item 2
above would be $1,304.61 for the fol~owing homes:
De~Ieese
Martin
1(anno
Fowler
Anderson
Maybec
Half-lot assessements would be applicable to the following homes:
Maude
Liljeblad ~$652.30 each.
The above lot assessment plan is fairest to all concerned and will
permit each homeowner to connect on to a sewer line at a very
reasonable cost.
It will allow I~ssrs.I1aybee/Liljeb1ad a reasonable chance of return
on our investment of $9,132.31.
Cempared to the costs of $3,000 per home in lower Cowan Hotghts
for a sewer connection it is most fair,just and moderate i~1coct.
I appreciate very much the time you allowed inc to discuss this
with you in your office.I hope that we have presented our side
of the picture as an equitable one.
Best personal regards,
Very
Herr/C.LiljebLadf
SCHEDULE “A”
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
55,
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I,FRED A.HARPER,Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No.7 ,
of Orange County,California,
do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No.
was regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said
Board on the inn day of
,l97~,by the following
vote,to wit:
AYES:flnston Cfltsan 0.stUn (ta~sz’sn),Lorin
tflset,Slits it.Penn,~bwtfl *sfln,lbn
I.*flth and 1k.tttpst.Ln
NOES:liens
ABSENT:lien.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No.
of Orange County,California,this iflh day of hbz’usn~l97~,
eU A.harper,SecreT
Board of Directors of Coun
Sanitation District No.I
of Orange County,California