Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 1950 - 0052-BRESOLUTION 140,~ R~8OWTION 0?~3UNT~~A~ITA1 W~I$TI~IC~f ~O,SEVEN FIXING AE~D~TEflIUWIflO C E~IO~J AND ~ ~PAID LEGAL COUNSEL IN coNNEceIo~WI~1 LIlXuu OATIQ$TO ~)EU~*UNL~1’~1~VAtJDI~O~A LX?41~D PAICIPAfl01~AOR~EM~NT UNDER W1~ICH CRR?AIN DIS mzc~rs vo~~Do~Ir~~OR ~pi~~ui~i~Am)co~ ~cTION 0?~~HAO~PACILITII~S. WI~E~E*$,tl*~at tsr of interpr~$n~t~lii’tited paz’t&o 1’ pat ion $~2’S5~Mfl$und*i’it~iC1~County Sani tat ion Die tn 3 te 14*0, 2,3 and 7 h*vs agreed to participate in a oouutywids sewerage dove lopr~*nt plan hsa arisen;end WKI~tEM,the attor~ys representing the p~posed boM buyers ds~that it is nesesesry to bring oourt proceeding to fix aui dotoz~tino the exact thtrpzstation of the aforesaid lir*ited participat~on s9e~ents1 ~ WliRBEAS,attorneys ~.J,Marks and AJniRfl Ia*s are the attorney.rep senting the Joint A~iniotrative On~eriisation ~d County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3~5,6,7 end ll~end W~11~IAS,the ate issaid attorneys ax’.p rep aring to bring •a proes.4~ng in the Die tniot Court of Appeal fox’the purpose of detarnining the valWty and interpretation of the stevssid united participation agreanent.and for any other neceessey puipoa.aM WHi~H~AS~it is ueoasaar~j that th•law tix~of O’Mlveny &Myers and Jenes L.I3sebe ~e ~loysd as oounse.t therein and be paid the re~s~l V1%S or t1~ir asrvioea thes’.in ~i.h will not be 3*s.than *1,000.00 or ~zt than ~],~00.O0. NOW,B~0~1E,~E IT R~0LVED$ That the teós of sash of said attorneys,•~sptin~ O’flelveny &Myers end Janee 1..~.ob.,be tize4 at the e~of U$O.00 _____ fl~&!flflOD °flt~u~~o~uto~o a 7~°s~~fl&?~O~G un~wapSOe &Wn®3 94@~gown a~i~n ~ C - ;o Rvr~ n~n r~ea pin p~z~q Az ~ea a te~e’q eaziq °yg~p~ss~st~in ________ ‘~‘~S6t ~oe~-‘~ QTq*u~~nz~v~wn fl~~e so Buno~tz ~q~pe*dsp~flatpdlez pwv £~np 3O~~°fl~t°°°s _______~iV OAMt~Otfl Vq~ 0~zT~o @~tZ!fr&Ø 30 ~~ta~DqMtfl fl’~at~rj uô~~p~fluno~ JO ~30 P&~Of1 ‘nfl 30 LflWO€I8 °UIW4ZW *W VWC)~! •3ORflO ~W LTEIOO 00 vtx~icino ~o ~vas SSUV 3Ø~c~A ~UflDflOEJ c~q~Sq pe~aes~o O~i &O%€OcZRE &q pcJpUoeoo WD’flW C~VJ,°tICflclSpt 3~flACU Ct~C - J~~ga uoflnycoou ~uTa*a&oz oqg, °rr ~L Og o~o~O~0~900W ~tao’w JO PU~1 ~ cuywv ~ugo~o~;o $nc p~pd eq ~°t~~t PSUOT~OW oaoqw o~ ~OflOGtZ1~u;COCUOtO p~O~OOO ~t~ta I2flLMM fl fl toot qno oq q~~vs u~m®6c~uee wg c4u4 ~gnovt eq~~w pc~~ct~nc~oq e&c~ott~!~tt °t~ aft~~p cRC~@©°S~~ s~UT pvad C4 0$~O2 ~oq~na eq ~á~t ei~~z@;ltsDOd6V jc~~aw~~~1(1 ~~odt~~ot~~q P(~@TOO9W(D O&C)U&(&flZ)Pfl~&O3 kQZt*P@t JO $000 ~L!2fl ~WJL °C 0oqooç~~‘T OG~p~Gfl&g eRuoatewOO flJ uomziouctn ~n ~t~~o g1~BoSciitst~~ta nfleedeoc2 oq~ aj ~o~g~oq~nw c)xeJoocite4 St~tgta fl~ncq cq~~u p~~d eq tT1?~fl1 Suta~ p~otu~pvcqd jo u@3$Jdz~doi8 s~coo;£eu~o~cD ~ °COflAJ!C$3 flQt1~JLO3 c3ntflj 3)OUQTW~a~OAO~Otfl $0 ~S~j eq eqeog 01 oo~’r pw~a.RoI~fl~1~UI~ATOW oO fl 0003 0 o&~dIOfl~CZa Onczs jo otto a °L r~C °~°o.ta o~øta~o~a ~p~toau1 o~~s&Su uo;;s~&T~t3d Ci~JO U©t%tea4~ioaT puv S5~fl~fl o~0$~g ~JO cq~°uo;~fl;~pocsdozd 04$7~11wg~2wcq oq~So;sn*~ UT qwo °t~p s~jo %nd Luw àø ~L~p ~o a; RESOLUTION NO.52-a RESOLUTION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 REPEALING RESOLUTION NO.50 WHEREAS,there has been a change in the plan proposed for the payment of attorney’s fees and expenses in connection with litigation to determine the validity of a limited participation agreement which is the subject of Resolution No.50 of County Sanitation District No.7;and WHEREAS,the best interests of County Sanitation District No.7 indicate that the repeal of Resolution No.50 is advisable; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED: That Resolution No.50 entitled “Resolution of County Sani tation District No.7 fixing and determining compensation and expenses to be paid legal counsel in connection with litigation to determine the validity of a limited participation Agreement under which certain districts voted bonds for the procurement and construction of sewerage facilities”be and hereby is repealed as of October 11,1950. The foregoing Resolution was introduced by Director Smith ~who moved its adoption.This motion was seconded by Director Reed and was carried by the following vote: AYES~Directors Willard Smith,Virgil H.Reed and Vincent L. Humeston NOES:None ABSENT:Director Irvin G.Gordon STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ss COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I,ORA MAE MERRITT,Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County,California, hereby certify that the above and foregoing ResolutLon was duly and regularly adopted by the said Board at a meeting thereof held on the 11th day of October,1950. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of October,1950. Secretary of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County,California