Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-04 ADM 9 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday,April 9,2008,at 5:00 P.M. A meeting of the Administration Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on April 9, 2008, at 5:00 p.m., in the Sanitation Districfs Administrative Office. (2) Following the Pledge of Allegiance,a quorum was declared present, as follows: ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE STAFF PRESENT: MEMBERS: Jim Ruth, General Manager DIRECTORS PRESENT: Bob Ghirelli,Assistant General Manager Mark Waldman, Chair Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering Phil Luebben,Vice Chair Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Bill Dalton Administrative Services Jon Dumitru Mike White, Controller Rich Freschi Lilia Kovac, Committee Secretary Don Hansen Jim Bunor Darryl Miller Rich Castillon Joy Neugebauer Norbert Gets Chris Norby Bob Geggie Christina Shea Randy Kleinman Jim Winder Paul Krzysiak Doug Davert, Board Vice Chair Paul Loehr Jeff Reed DIRECTORS ABSENT: Rich Spencer Sal Tinajero Jim Ferryman, Board Chair OTHERS PRESENT: Brad Hogin, General Counsel Robert Grantham Don McLean Sean Moieny Chris Rouk pOpF Toby Weissert OA �I A E§R CT (3) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM Imo'/2 3 2006 No appointment was necessary. /' 81t /` (4) PUBLIC COMMENTS Sean Moieny of Scottel and Chris Rouk of NEC addressed the committee members with reference to item 10(a), and stated that the companies they represent provide equipment and services of equal or better value and asked for a delay on issuance of the telephone system contract award. Minutes of the Administration Committee April 9, 2008 Page 2 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Waldman did not give a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager, Jim Ruth, did not give a report. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Administrative Services, reported briefly on the stock market activity and the Sanitation District's bond insurer's rating may require a speedy debt refinance to retain the AA bond rating, bypassing the Administration Committee and going directly to the Board for approval. Mr. Tyner also advised the committee members that a labor bargaining unit agreement requires that a reclassification change request be made to correct a clerical error, and will be going direcfly to the Board for approval. Director of Engineering, Jim Herberg, presented a brief overview of the CIP program and its relationship to the budget. (8) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL Brad Hogin, General Counsel, did not give a report. (9) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve minutes of the March 12, 2008 meeting of the Administration Committee. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ACTION ITEMS a. ADM08-08 Information Technology Manager, Rich Castillon, presented a brief history of telephone systems and technical problems with the Sanitation Districts current phone system. Mr. Castillon also reported that after releasing a nationwide request for information and an on-going study, and pilot Program of phone systems that had been carried at various levels for the last three years, staff is recommending to approve a compatible, suitable, and cost efficient system at 4% above the GSA discounted pricing. Minutes of the Administration Committee April 9, 2006 Page 3 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to: 1)Approve a sole source purchase order to ShoreTel Inc. for the purchase of hardware and software to replace OCSD's telephone system,for a total amount of$375,460; and, 2)Approve a 5% contingency($18,775). By a showing of hands, three no votes were recorded. b. ADM08-09 The rate study report prepared by Carollo Engineers was distributed to the Directors, and questions about the study results were answered by the Carollo Engineers representatives and the District's Controller, Mike White. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt revised methodology for calculating high strength discharger permit rates based upon net revenue requirements that includes a reduction for property taxes paid by customers. Director Dumitru opposed. (11) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. ADM08-10 Status on the renewal quotes of the District's Major Insurance Programs for FY 2008-09 Principal Financial Analyst Randy Kleinman, recognized Don McLean of Alliance Insurance,who presented the current insurance conditions,which are favorable to the Sanitation District. Insurance rates for the Districts major insurance programs will be submitted for approval in May. b. ADM08-11 FY 2008-09 Benefits Program Renewal Costs Employee Relations Supervisor, Rich Spencer, provided a brief report of health Insurance rate Increase history and projected rates. Staff will be presenting the new rates at the May Administration committee meeting. G. ADM08-12 FY 2008-09 and 2009-10 District Proposed Budget Update Director of Finance and Administrative Services, Lorenzo Tyner, presented an overview of the proposed budget, highlighting limited growth, a revised CIP program, increased staffing levels, while assuming a strong financial position. (12) CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957(b)(1): The Board convened in closed session at 6:55 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9, Subdivision (a). RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: The Board reconvened in regular session at 7:20 p.m. Minutes of the Administration Committee April 9, 2008 Page 4 (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT A request by Director Miller was made to explore methods of calculating actual discharge flows for accurate billing. Director Norby requested that trips to the District's biosolids facilities be considered for the Board members. (15)ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. The next regular Administration Committee meeting is scheduled for May 14, 2008, at 5 p.m. Submitted by: Lilia Kovac Committee Secretary Distributed at the Proposed Budget FY 08-09 and FY 09-10 Admi I ration Committee Administration Committee G Meeting Apd19,2008 Proposed Budget for FY 08-09 and FY 09-10 SY iANl rq T/ �S iP y THE Orange County Sanitation District April 9, 2008 Highlights of the proposed budget: ♦ Budget Outlays ♦ FY 07-08 Budget=$513 million ♦ FY 08-09 Budget=$589 million • FY09-10 Budget=$490 million ♦ Revised Capital Improvement Program (CIP) ♦ 18% increase in FY 08-09 ♦ 32%decrease in FY 09-10 ♦ Increased Staffing Levels— 1% per year, 641 and 648 FTEs ♦ Strong Financial Positioning— maintains AA bond rating ♦ Two-Year Budget—annual updates Proposed Budget FY 08-09 and FY 09-10 Administration Committee April 9,2008 Additional revenue and debt financing are required to support needed capital improvements . 'avenues: ? F�1 09 9y FY00.11- Fees 8 Charges $219 M (37%) $242 M (46%) General Income $117 M (20%) $116 M (22%) Debt Proceeds $256 M (43%) $173 M (32%) T`iLl Rey'BOrAs 18�' $831:�11 -. . Outlays: FY 08-09 FY 09.10 CIP(indudng DeM Service) $441 M (75%) $335 M (68%) Treatment 8 Disposal $148 M (25%) $155 M (32%) Total Outlays $589 M $080 M Sources of Funds General Income $117 M rges 20% Fees$242M General Income Fees 8 Charges �% $116 M $219 M Dept Proceeds 22% 37% $256 M 43% Debt Proceeds $173 M 32% FY 08.09 FY 09-10 Total:$592 Million Total:$531 Million L Proposed Budget FY 08-09 and FY 09-10 Administration Committee April 9, 2008 Most OCSD revenue is related to User Fees. FY 08-09 FY 09-10 General User Fees $ 183 M $ 203 M Permit User Fees $ 16 M $ 18 M Capital Facilities Capacity $ 20 M $ 21 M Charges Total Fees & Charges $ 219 M $ 242 M Most of our non-fee related revenues come from property taxes. FY 08-09 FY 09-10 Property Tax $ 65 M $ 68 M Interest $ 18 M $ 19 M Interagency Sewer Charges $ 29 M $ 24 M Other $ 5 M $ 5 M Total Non-Fee Related Revenue $ 117 M $ 116 M 3 Proposed Budget FY 08-09 and FY 09-10 Administration Committee April 9,2008 Outlays Outlays will decrease almost $100 million in FY 09-10, primarily due to the CIP. FY 08-09 IFY 09-10 CIP (including Debt service) $ 441 M (7s%) $ 335 M (sa%) Treatment and Disposal $ 148 M (25%) $ 155 M (32%) Total Outlays $ 589 M $ 490 M 9 Proposed Budget FY 08.09 and FY 09-10 Administration Committee April 9, 2008 The Capital Improvement Program can be divided into five distinct areas. FY 08-09 FY 09.10 1. Secondary Treatment Facilities $ 168 M $ 98 M 2. Groundwater Replenishment System $ 3 M $ OM 3. Treatment Plant Rehab/ Upgrades $ 102 M $ 78 M 4. Collections $ 91 M $ 68 M 5. Debt Service $ 77 M $ 91 M Total $ 441 M $ 335 M More than $145 million is allocated to Treatment and Disposal Expenses. FY 08-09 FY 09-10 CIP (including Debt Service) $ 441 M (7s%) $ 335 M (eex) Treatment and Disposal $ 148 M (25%) $ 155 M (32%) Total Expenditures $ 589 M $490 M S- Proposed Budget FY 08-09 and FY 09.10 Administration Committee April 9, 2008 Total Treatment and Disposal Expenses increase S21 million from FY 07-08 to FY 09-10. + 11% +5% $148 M $155 M 0 0 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 09-10 Projected Proposed Proposed Total operating costs will increase an average of 7.6% from $134 to $155 over 2 years. Rentals! Expenses by Category eatlgel Praledetl PmpOaetl Proposed (Operating costs only,S Million.) FY 07-0 FY 07-08 FY 06-09 FY Wl0 Salaries and!Solana S 79.9 S 79.5 $ 83.9 S 89.9 Conlraclwl Services 21./ 19s 285 28.9 Operdling Expenses 23.1 18.3 22.2 23.5 Repairs and Maintenance 10.3 107 11.3 10.1 ulililies 9.9 10.3 9.7 10.2 Professional Services 3.7 2.8 IS 29 Other Materials.Supplies and Services 37 2.9 2.6 2.8 Trainings and Meetings 1.5 1.3 1.4 1A Research and MonOomrg is 1.1 1.4 1.4 Adminislralive Expenses 1.5 LC 1.3 1.3 Printing and Publications OJ 0.6 07 0.7 Capital Grants to Member Agencies 2.5 2,4 0.3 2.1 Cost Allocation (19.8) (17.6) (19.3) (20.3) Total Opendfing Expatriates $140.0 $133.6 $147.8 SISS.S f Proposed Budget FY 08-09 and FY 09.10 Administration Committee April 9, 2008 The majority of the expenditure increase will occur in three categories: FY 08-09 FY 09-10 Category Millions Millions 1. Salaries and Benefits $4.4 $6.0 2. Contractual Services $8.6 $0.4 3. Operating Expenses $3.9 $1.3 Existing collective bargaining agreements and a 1 % increase in staffing will increase Salaries and Benefit costs. Proposed Proposed FY 08-09 FY 09-10 Wages + 2.5 M + 4.7 M Benefits + 1.9 M + 1.3 M Total Salaries + 4.4 M + 6.0 M & Benefits Proposed Budget FY 08-09 and FY 09-10 Administration Committee April 9,2008 Blosolids hauling costs continue to rise increasing contractual services budget. FY 08-09 IY 09-10 Proposed Proposed Solids Removal + 5.6 M + 1.9 M Other Waste Disposal + 2.7 M < 1.5 M > Other + 0.3 M — Total Contractual Services + 8.6 M + 0.4 M The costs of chemicals required to treat effluent to current levels continue to increase. Proposed Proposed FY 08-09 FY 09-10 Chemicals + 2.5 M +0.4 M (includes disinfection 8 odor control) Chemical Coagulants + 1.2 M + 0.9 M Other + 0.2 M — Total Operating + 3.9 M + 1.3 M Expenses 5 Proposed Budget FY 08-09 and FY 09-10 Administration Committee April 9, 2008 Next Steps ♦ Additional Administrative Committee meetings ♦ Budget presentations for each Committee ♦ Presentation and adoption at the June Board meeting Distributed at the Administration Committee Capital Improvement Program �Jj9 �G l Meeting Administration Committee April 9, 2008 Two-Year Budget Update Capital Improvement Program (CIP) PlY Silill4l/ aJ� H 2 2 pa the Orange County Sanitation District Apri19, 2008 Accomplishments Met the fourth of six Completed 12 CIP Consent Decree Milestones Projects = $207 Million ti Capital Improvement Program Administration Committee April 9, 2008 Change Order Rate Decrease 20% Projected 15% -- —G081(5%) Actual 10% 5% 0% 2006 2006 2010 Fiscal Year Annual Validation Process OCSD toResources \ New Cash 0 Revised CIP k`�Y') Information Program Flow CIP kAnalysis Risks& Impactsto Rates OCSD Capital Improvement Program Administration Committee April 9, 2W8 Projected CIP Budget $400 M ___________________------------------ --___ .-.Current Budget Ig Past(spent) Projected Future $200 M $100M - -' -' so M -ii 05-06 07-08 09-10 11-12 13-14 15-16 17-18 19-20 Fiscal Year Projected CIP Budget $400 M -------------------------------- Current Budget - ■ Past(spent) G GWR System ■ Secondary $300 M --------- ________ _ TP Rehab/Upgrade Collections s Future $200M _ _ __ _______ $100 M - - - �- - so M 05-06 07-08 09-10 11-12 13-14 15-16 17-18 19-20 Fiscal Year Capital Improvement Program Administration Committee April 9, 2008 CIP Expenditures for FY08-09 by Type $358.5 Million 41P Planning 2% Design 7% CIP Expenditures for FY08-09 by Type $358.5 Million Secondary Improved Treatment Treatment $167,847,222_ _$22,464,700 New Capacity $30,372,300 Support $10,880,114 GWR System_ Rehabilitation $2,766,000 $124,198,497 Capital Improvement Program Administration Committee April 9, 2008 New CIP Projects — Level of Service Total Budget 1. Cengen Emissions Control Project $ 31 .0 M 2. Solids Storage Odor Control $ 10.2 M 3. Trickling Filter Odor Control $ 4.6 M 4. Primary Scrubbing at Plant No.1 $ 4.2 M New CIP Projects (coat'd) Total Budget 5. Southwest Costa Mesa Trunk $ 12.6 M 6. Plant Water System at Plant No.1 $ 3.5 M 7. Plant Water System at Plant No.2 $ 2.5 M s. Oxygen Plant $ 2.5 M 9. Final Effluent Sampler / Building $ 1.5 M to. Flare System Expansion & Upgrades $ 1.5 M ti. 2009 NPDES Permit Renewal $ 0.8 M 12. Power Building 3A $ 0.5 M 13. Fuel Cell Hydrogen Gas Pilot $ 0.5 M 14. Engineering Studies $ 0.2 M S Capital Improvement Program ' Administration Committee April 9, 2008 Top Revised CIP Projects Proposed Total Budget 1. Solids Thickening & Processing $ 64.8 M 2. Digester Rehab at Plant No.1 $ 60.4 M 3. Electrical Cable Improvements $ 37.4 M 4. Digester Rehab at Plant No.2 $ 36.4 M 5. Beach / Knott Sewer Relief $ 25.6 M 6. Power Monitoring & Control $ 10.9 M Questions? Distributed at the Administration Committee Meeting Orange County Sanitation District Revenue Program and Rate Update FINAL April 2008 L Cap ^//^ EnglOaOM WOAlnO WOo YMb Water 3033 NORTH AATH STREET, SUITE 101 • PHOENIX ARIZONA 85018 • 1602) 253-9500 • FAX (802) 265-1422 C3,1PrR.Iz-CAt0CBDID.H.blW%2O08 OCBD Rerenee Prc9rem-Ba000B.dx Orange County Sanitation District Revenue Program and Rate Update Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose and Scope.........................................................................................1 1.1.1 Purpose............................................................................................1 1.1.2 Scope of Work..................................................................................1 1.2 Background.....................................................................................................1 1.3 Project Findings and Recommendations..........................................................2 2.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND DATA......................................................................................2 2.1 Flow and Growth Assumptions........................................................................2 2.1.1 Flows................................................................................................3 2.1.2 Equivalent Dwelling Units.................................................................3 22 Approach to Rate Analysis...............................................................................4 2.3 User Rate Categories......................................................................................4 2A Capital Facility Capacity Charge(CFCC)Categories.......................................5 2.5 Capital Improvement Plan................................................................................5 2.6 Functional Allocation........................................................................................6 2.7 Operations and Maintenance Expenditures.....................................................9 2.8 Existing Financial Information..........................................................................9 3.0 REVENUE REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS..................................................a.................9 3.1 Introduction......................................................................................................9 32 Funding Sources............................................................................................10 3.3 Findings and Recommendations....................................................................13 4.0 RATE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS..............................................................................15 4.1 Introduction....................................................................................................15 4.2 Revenue Needs................................................................a............................16 4.3 Functional Allocation......................................................................................17 4AUnit Costs......................................................................................................19 4.5 Customer Category Rates.............................................................................20 4.5.1 Industrial User Rates......................................................................21 4.6 Findings and Recommendations........................................a...........................24 5.0 CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE ANALYSIS.........................................25 5.1 Introduction....................................................................................................25 5.2 Findings and Recommendations....................................................................26 5.3 Green Building User Rates and CFCCs.........................................................26 5.3.1 LEED Guidelines............................................................................27 5.3.2 Green User Rates..........................................................................27 5.3.3 Green CFCCs...............................................................................a.28 5.3.4 Findings and Recommendations....................................................29 APPENDIX A Project Calculations APPENDIX B User Categories April 2008 i G wigxm-MGCSD�W .bftVOOB MSS R.v .Po -01NOB.Eoc LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Summary of Total Projected Treatment Plant Flows.......................................3 Table 2.2 Historical and Projected Equivalent Dwelling Units(w/o industrial).................3 Table 2.3 Operation and Maintenance Cost Allocation to Billable Constituents..............7 Table 2.4 Capital Cost Allocations to Billable Constituents.............................................8 Table 2.5 CIP Billable Constituents Cost Breakdown (Millions of Dollars)......................9 Table 3.1 Outstanding Certificates of Participation Debt at January 31, 2008.............. 11 Table 3.2 FY 2008/09 Reserve Requirements(Millions of Dollars)............................... 12 Table 3.3 Revenue Requirements (Millions of Dollars)................................................. 14 Table 4.1 User Rate Charges....................................................................................... 16 Table 4.2 Expenditures and Off-Setting Revenues(Millions of Dollars)........................ 17 Table 4.3 Allocation Percentage Basis......................................................................... 18 Table 4A Functional Allocation of Costs...................................................................... 18 Table 4.5 Total Flow and Load Information.................................................................. 19 Table 4.6 Flow and Load per EDU (FY 2008/09).......................................................... 19 Table 4.7 Total Annual Flow and Loads(FY 2008/09).................................................20 Table 4.8 Unit Cost Calculation (FY 2008/09)..............................................................20 Table 4.9 Current Industrial User Sewer Service Charges (FY 2007/08)......................21 Table 4.10 Gross Cost of Service(FY 2008/09).............................................................22 Table 4.11 Net Cost of Service(FY 2008/09).................................................................22 Table 4.12 Industrial User Rate Structure Alternatives...................................................23 Table 4.13 Projected User Rates...................................................................................24 Table 4.14 Industrial User Rates(FY 2008/09)..............................................................25 Table 5.1 Recommended FY 2008/09 CFCC and SCFCC........................................... 26 April 2008 G.V,.b-CNOCS�0.r.bl.,WW OCSD Revenue Program-WOIIA. Orange County Sanitation District 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Scope 1.1.1 Purpose The purpose of this report is to present the findings of a study of the District's user rates and capital facilities capacity charges (CFCC).The study evaluated the District's wastewater utility revenue needs,and developed user rates and wastewater capital facilities capacity charges to equitably distribute costs among utility customers. 1.1.2 Scope of Work The scope of work includes the following: • Perform a revenue requirement analysis; • Evaluate the District's user rates; and • Evaluate the District's wastewater capital facilities capacity charges. 1.2 Background The Orange County Sanitation District is a public agency responsible for regional wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal. The District provides service to an area of approximately 471 square miles with a population of approximately 2.25 million people in the northern and central portion of the County, treating approximately 240 mgd of wastewater.The District owns sanitary sewerage facilities with a replacement value of approximately$5.38 billion. On July 17,2002. the Board of Directors approved Resolution No. OCSD-14, "Establishing the Policy for Level of Treatment of Wastewater Discharged into the Ocean" This resolution established the District's policy to treat all wastewater discharges Into the ocean to secondary treatment standards. Implementation of full secondary treatment standards is scheduled to be completed on or before December 31,2012. The wastewater system must also meet other demands, including service to a growing population,odor control improvements, and air quality protection needs. Over the next 13 years,the District's overall Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)is projected to total approximately$2 billion.All capital costs presented within this report are stated in 2008 dollars, unless otherwise denoted. April 2008 1 cTM)K4-u%eCSMahwmblesVMe ocsu Revenue Pm mm-N0308AM 1.3 Project Findings and Recommendations Based on the analyses performed for this rate update,the District should implement the following recommendations: • Increase the annual user rate from $182 to$201.25 per equivalent dwelling unit(EDU) in FY 2008/09. • Implement annual increases between 7 percent and 10.5 percent in subsequent years between FY 2009110 and FY 2014/15. • Update the industrial rates based on the net cost-of-service unit costs developed through this revenue program update. • No updates to the District's Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC)are recommended, other than the annual construction cost inflation increase that is already part of the District's rate ordinance. In the future, the CFCC should be increased with construction cost inflation, unless they need to be revisited because of major changes in the CIP or growth assumptions. These changes would typically occur in years when the strategic plan is updated. • All of these recommendations should be updated periodically, as the District updates its operation and capital cost projections in future years. The basis for these recommendations is presented within the report herein. The project calculations are presented in Appendix A of this report. 2.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND DATA 2.1 Flow and Growth Assumptions According to the Interim Strategic Plan Update(June 2002),the population of the District's service area is projected to grow to 2.5 million by the year 2020. Average flow rates at both treatment plants are projected to increase to a total combined flow of 265 million gallons a day by 2020. The average yearly influent flow to the District has remained relatively stable for the preceding five years. The wastewater flow for FY 2000101 was 246 mgd (average annual basis)and for FY 2006/07 was 238.4 mgd (average annual basis). The highest flows of 500 mgd (peak hour wet weather basis)were recorded during El Nino storm periods in December 1997 and February 1998. April 2008 2 GMm*m-cx�csaueih ble,=8 OCSG Revenue Pm m-N0300.dw 2.1.1 Flows Projected flows treated by the District are presented within Table 2.1. Table 2.1 Summary of Total Projected Treatment Plant Flows Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District Flow(mgd) Flow Source 2008 2010 2015 2020 -Residential and Commercial Flows 21520 218.1 226.2 234.8 - Irvine Ranch Water District(IRWD) 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 -Santa Ana Watershed Protection Agency SAW PA) 12.1 16 17 18 -Sunset Beach Sanitation District(SSBSD) 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Total District Flows 239.65 246.45 255.55 265.15 Residential fl Commercial flaws include urban runall vnt we wvnffir on and mlbxa. 2.1.2 Equivalent Dwelling Units The District provided customer growth figures.Two methods were used to estimate growth. One method projects growth based on historic growth rates. The other method projects growth based on projections provided by the Center for Demographic Research at the California State University at Fullerton. The number of customers or connections to a sewer system is often expressed in Equivalent Dwelling Units.An Equivalent Dwelling Unit(EDU)is a measurement of the demand on collection and treatment facilities in terms of flow and strength that is equivalent to that produced by a single-family home. Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD)and Total Suspended Solids (TSS)measure influent strength. Both residential and commercial user rates, as well as CFCCs, are based on EDUs. The historical number of customers served by the District from FY 2000/01 through FY 2006/07, identified in Equivalent Dwelling Units CEDUs")along with pmjections through FY 2009/10, are set forth in Table 2.2 below(beginning on page 3 and continued on page 4). Table 22 Historical and Projected Equivalent Dwelling Units(w/o Industrial) Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District Fiscal Years 2000/01 through 2009/10 Fiscal Year Historical EDUs 2000-01 883,603 2001-02 898,031 2002-03 897,757 April 2008 3 G:WIccb-CN CSD06iverabl.W)8 Oc$D Rawnue Program-DI N.doc Table 2.2 Historical and Projected Equivalent Dwelling Units(w/o Industrial) Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District Fiscal Years 2000101 through 2009110 Fiscal Year Historical EDUs 2003-04 884,169 2004-05 893.501 2005-06 899.262 2006-07 907.668 2007-08 913,573 2008-09 919,534 2009.10 925,516 (1) EDU growth during the projection period is estimated at approximately 0.65%per annum. Source:Oran County Sanitation District. The District calculates the number of EDUs based on the annual revenues divided by the current single-family residential (3-bedroom house)annual user rate charge. Based on projected revenues for FY 2008109 of$185 million and a projected annual user rate of $201.25 per EDU,the District is assumed to serve 919,534 EDUs (not including industrial EDUs).This EDU count is used as the basis for the analysis presented within this study. 2.2 Approach to Rate Analysis Rate developing consists of two steps. First, the annual revenue requirement is determined, defining the amount of revenue that must be collected through user rates each year in order to meet the District's cash and bond coverage obligations.Second, unit costs for flow, BOD and TSS are developed based on this annual revenue requirement.This process is discussed later within this report. 2.3 User Rate Categories Users are billed a flat wastewater service charge based on the property use classification maintained by the County Assessor.The District maintains a listing of average flow and wastewater strength discharges for each property type, which is used to develop the user rates. The single-family residential(SFR)user rate is based on typical flow and loadings for an average 3-bedroom home and serves as the base rate to calculate rates for other users. Multi-family residential users are charged 70 percent per unit of the SFR rate. Commercial and the majority of industrial users are charged a percentage of the SFR rate as specified in Ordinance No.OCSD-32(OCSD-32),the Fees and Charges Ordinance.These use factors are based on the average flow and strength characteristics for the type of property, charged on a 1,000 square-foot basis. Users with unusually high flows and/or strength of April 2008 4 G:1% *j - W&D Revenue Roprtm-W Wd. wastewater, known as'Permit Users," pay individually calculated charges, based on measured wastewater flows and strengths. The District currently has 30 different residential and commercial use codes. See Table B for a complete listing of user rate categories, contained in OCSD.32. 2.4 Capital Facility Capacity Charge (CFCC) Categories The Capital Facility Capacity Charge is a one-time charge imposed when a building or structure is newly connected to the District's system, or when an existing structure or category of use is expanded or increased. The current base charge is$4,517, calculated based on the flow and wastewater loadings for an average 3-bedroom home.Adjustments to the base charge are delineated in OCSD-32.The rates for each size of SFR and MFR are determined as a relative percentage higher or lower than the base(3 bedroom SFR)of 1.0, depending on the unit's size. Commercial and industrial CFCCs are classified as"Low; "Average;or"High"demand connections, based on the property type. In addition to the base CFCC imposed at the time of connecting to the wastewater system, significant commercial-industrial users and special purpose dischargers are subject to a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for discharges in excess of baselines established for flow, BOD,and TSS.A full description of the baselines and supplemental CFCC rates are described in sections 3.07—3.10 of OCSD-32. A"Significant Commercial-Industrial User'(SCIU)is an entity that discharges commercial or industrial How in an amount greater than 25,000 gpd,or BOD greater than 150 pounds per day,or TSS greater than 150 pounds per day,or who is required to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit.Waste Discharge Permits are required for dischargers that have federally or District requlated discharges, or for discharges considered significant by OCSD staff. A"special purpose discharger" (SPD)is an entity who discharges an amount greater than 25,000 gpd (excluding domestic, industrial, or commercial)and who is required to obtain a Special Purpose Discharge Permit as prescribed in Section 305 of Ordinance No. OCSD-31. 2.5 Capital Improvement Plan The District developed the current Capital Impmvement Plan (CIP)in combination with the Interim Strategic Plan. This CIP is updated annually and runs through FY 2020121.The District expects to meet future demands on the Wastewater System through the CIP. This program has been developed to satisfy anticipated regulatory requirements, increased population, additional treatment requirements,conservation, energy, and other resource- savings considerations, odor control improvements, and air quality protection needs. Over the next 13 years,the District's CIP will accomplish: April 2005 5 G VMl a- OO Revenue Wa9r -(=IMAM • Major rehabilitation of the existing headworks, primary treatment, secondary treatment, and solids handling facilities at both treatment plants. • Replace and rehabilitate many of the District's outlying pumping stations, and trunk sewers. • Fund cooperative projects to help cities upgrade their sewer systems. • Achieve full secondary treatment standards. In preparation of each year's Budget, the District conducts an Annual CIP Validation Study to ensure that the scopes of the projects were necessary, and that the cost estimates were accurate. As a result of the completion of the CIP Validation Study and the Secondary Treatment Peer Review in the spring of 2003,a revised CIP was developed to meet secondary treatment standards as quickly as possible,while providing for increased flows and rehabilitation and refurbishment of existing facilities. Implementation of full secondary treatment standards is scheduled to be completed on or before December 31, 2012. The CIP,as included within this study, totals approximately$2.03 billion in 2008 dollars ($2.41 billion in nominal dollars)between FY 2008/09 and FY 2020/21. Of this total, approximately$1.73 billion will be undertaken for replacement/rehabilitation and treatment upgrades, while$0.30 billion will be undertaken to provide capacity for projected growth. The CIP expenditures over the next five years are projected to total$1.08 billion in 2008 dollars; an annual average of$216.5 million. 2.6 Functional Allocation In addition to the breakdown between replacement and expansion projects, it is also necessary to allocate these costs to billable constituents that can be measured both at the treatment facilities and for each user to enable the capital and O&M project costs to be charged to existing and future users.To accomplish this, the costs for each project were broken into the costs associated with treatment of the billable constituents:Flow and strength (Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)and Total Suspended Solids (TSS)). There are separate allocations for O & M and capital costs. The allocation percentages for O& M costs, by unit process, are presented in Table 2.3. An example of how these allocations are applied is shown later in the report in Table 4A. April 2008 6 D:w•I•n•-fA CMD•IIK/eplW=08 OCW R..nue Rogrem-N0308.d Table 2.3 Operation and Maintenance Cost Allocation to Billable Constituents Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District Allocation Percentages (%) Treatment Process Flow BOD TSS Collection and Diversion 90 5 5 Interplant 90 5 5 Headworks 75 5 20 Primary Sedimentation 15 25 60 Activated Sludge Process - 100 - Oxygen Activated Sludge - 100 - Blower Equipment and Structures - 100 - Aeralion Equipment and Structures - 100 - Tdckling Filters - 100 - Secondary Sedimentation - 100 - Sludge Thickening"I - 25 75 Digestion - 25 75 Solids Handling - 25 75 Solids Disposal - 45 55 Effluent Disposal 100 - - Non-Assignable Costs In 32 33 34 Source: 1998 Determination of Financial Rates and Charges Report. (1)Allocation of sludge thickening was changed to reflect co-thickening process. 2 Percentage based on weighted averagle for all other allocated costs. April 2008 7 GN01e -CMOCSO Jjwr wl SOCSORewnw PMmm 000 W0 For the capital related costs, the allocation percentages, by unit process, are presented in Table 2.4. Table 2.4 Capital Cost Allocations to Billable Constituents Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District Allocation Percentages (%) Unit Process Flow BOD TSS Collection and Diversion 90 10 — Interplant 90 10 — Headworks 75 5 20 Primary Sedimentation — 30 70 Activated Sludge Process — 100 — Oxygen Activated Sludge — 100 — Blower Equipment and Structures — 100 — Aeration Equipment and Structures — 100 — Trickling Filters — 100 0 Secondary Sedimentation — 70 30 Sludge Thickening t't — 25 75 Digestion — 25 75 Solids Handling — 25 75 Solids Disposal — 45 55 Effluent Disposal 100 — — Non-Assignable Costs RI 44 37 19 Source: 1998 Determination of Financial Rates and Charges Report. (1)Allocation of sludge thickening was changed to reflect co-thickening process. 2 Percentage based on weighted average for all other allocated costs. Table 2.5 applies the information from Table 2A and presents the replacement and expansion CIP costs broken into the billable constituents from FY 2008/09 to FY 2020121. These capital expenditures are stated in 2008 dollars. April 2008 8 cv,q«s CAODSD1 llI raGes�'Oi8ocsDRe.o Pro ,2m-ND30.dm Table 2.5 CIP Billable Constituents Cost Breakdown (Millions of Dollars) Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District Flow SOD TSS Total CIP Costs Replacement $663.2 $639.2 $428.5 $1,730.9 Expansion $125A $129.3 $ 47.0 $ 301.7 (1)Costs presented in 20D8 dollars. 2.7 Operations and Maintenance Expenditures The revenue requirement analysis uses the District's FY 2007108 budgets as the basis for forecasting future revenue needs. Expenditures are assumed to increase commensurate with cost inflation and projected cost increases associated with increases in wastewater flaws due to growth and higher treatment standards. Revenues and expenses are pmjected for future fiscal years using the following annual escalation factors, as agreed upon with the District: • General Cost Inflation:4% • Variable O&M Inflation:7% • Labor Inflation:6% • Construction Cost Inflation:5% • Customer Growth:0.65% • Fund Earnings:4% 2.8 Existing Financial Information The background financial information supplied by the District included:existing debt service and future payments, current reserve ending fund balance,other future non-treatment aftemative-related expenses, other future revenues,future property taxes, and other miscellaneous financial information.The District also provided revenues and expenses associated with providing service to Irvine Ranch Water District(IRWD),Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority(SAWPA), Sunset Beach Sanitation District(SSBSD), and other miscellaneous items. 3.0 REVENUE REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS 3.1 Introduction The revenue requirement analysis determines the amount of rate revenue needed in a given year to meet a utility's expected financial obligations. At least two separate tests must be met in order for rates to be sufficient: April 2008 9 ki:w ss-GqAG5Dk0e�i,+xeeleslAOBOCSD Revenue Progmr-0103W,d. 1) Cash Flow Test-A utility must generate annual utility revenues adequate to meet general cash needs. 2) Bond Coverage Test-Annual rate revenues must satisfy debt coverage obligations on Certificates of Participation. The cash flow test identifies projected cash requirements in each given year.Cash requirements include operations and maintenance expenses,debt service payments, policy-driven additions to working capital, miscellaneous capital outlays, replacement funding, and rate funded capital expenditures.These expenses are compared to total annual projected revenues. Shortfalls are then used to estimate needed rate increases. The bond coverage test measures the ability of a utility to meet both legal and policy-driven revenue obligations.Because the District has variable rate certificates of participation (COPS), it is required to collect sufficient funds through rates to meet all ongoing operational and maintenance expenses, as well as 2.0 limes the total debt service requirements due in a year. The coverage factor is set by policy in order to maintain the District's current bond rating.At times,the District has allowed the coverage factor to go below 2.0,on a short-tens basis, to help prevent large fluctuations in rate increases. A COP is a debt instrument where the purchaser receives a share in an installment sale arrangement with the District. Revenues must be sufficient to satisfy both tests. If revenues are found to be deficient through one or both of the tests,then the greater deficiency(shortfall)drives the rate increase. 3.2 Funding Sources Over the next ten years,the District projects$1.77 billion in future wastewater treatment improvements and in future collection system capital improvements, as stated in 2008 dollars.The District expects to fund these improvements through a combination of revenues, reserves, and COPS.The District expects to issue approximately$840 million in certificates of participation over the next ten years. Payments with respect to any such indebtedness are expected to be executed and delivered as Additional Obligations under the Master Agreement on a parity with the Installment Payments. Current Revenues User Rates-User rates can be increased to accumulate reserves to cash fund capital projects. The District established a Capital Improvement Reserve to fund annual increments of the CIP with a target level at one-half of the average annual CIP through the year 2021. The Capital Replacement/Renewal Reserve was established to provide thirty percent of the funding to replace or refurbish the current collection, treatment, and disposal facilities. Further,forthis analysis,we have used a "rate smoothing"strategy for meeting future rate requirements. Projected rate increases in FY 2008/09 are designed to both flatten annual April 2008 10 D:VFGJ W- DCSD Revenue Mogrem-000305.Ex rate increases and allow for the accumulation of reserves. This approach is designed to reduce long-term costs to the customers by reducing the District's debt requirements and help maintain their current bond rating. Capital Facilities Capacity Charges-CFCCs are a one-time charge imposed on new development or expansion of existing users that increase demand on the system.They provide for equitable cost recovery of growth-related costs. New Debt The District can issue Certificates of Participation (COPs)to fund capital-related projects. By issuing debt,the Utility is legally required to maintain a 125x coverage ratio on the maximum outstanding annual debt service. This means that rates must cover annual cash operating expenses plus 125 percent of the maximum annual outstanding debt service payments. This coverage requirement is delineated within The Master Agreement for District Obligations, dated August 1,2000. However, because some of the Districts outstanding COPS are variable rate,a more stringent policy coverage ratio of 2.Ox is imposed. Currently the District has Senior Obligations Outstanding payable on a parity with the Installment Payments under the Installment Purchase Agreement. Table 3.1 describes the District's outstanding certificates of participation as of January 31,2008. Table 3.1 Outstanding Certificates of Participation Debt at January 31,2008 Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District Principal Issue Outstanding Final Amount Date Balance Maturity 1992 Certificates $160,600.000 12/3/92 $77,340,000 8/l/13 1993 Certificates 46,000,000 9/2/93 26,900,000 8/1/16 Series 2000 Certificates 218,600,000 8/13100 196,600,000 8/1/30 Series 2003 Certificates 280,000,000 8/26/03 191,500,000 2/1/33 Series 2006 Certificates 200,000,000 3/1/06 196,600,000 2/1136 Series 2007A 95,180,000 12107 93,655,000 211/30 Certificates Series 2007E 300,000,000 12107 300,000,000 2/1/37 Certificate Total Long-Term Debt $1,300.380,000 $1,082.595,000 April 2008 11 G:W4Ke-G10CSDDetimaWc1Zp90GSDRewnue Ra9em-OIIXIOB.Oa Reserves The District maintains eight separate categories for its reserve funds. Table 3.2 delineates the projected reserve requirements for FY 2008/09. Increases to the Capital Improvement Program Reserve and Debt Service Required Reserves are attributable principally to the funding of projected CIP cash flow and the Reserve Fund forthe Certificates. Table 3.2 FY 2008/09 Reserve Requirements (Millions of Dollars) Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District Cash Flow Requirements Reserve Operating Expenses $74.5 Certificate of Participation Payments 76.4 Operating Contingencies Reserve 14.9 Capital Improvement Program Reserve 77.3 Catastrophe and Self Insurance 57.0 Capital Replacement and Refurbishment 55.2 Debt Servioe Required Reserves 133.7 Less:Adjustment to Reserves (40.0) Total $449 FVIW8/0a RoJWc Rm Requlr•menra. • The Cash Flow Requirements Reserve was established to fund operation, maintenance, and certificates of participation debt service expenses for the first half of the fiscal year, prior to the receipt of the first installment of the property tax allocation and user rates which are collected as a separate line item on the property tax bill. The level of this reserve is established as the sum of an amount equal to six months operations and maintenance expense and the total of certificates of participation debt service expenses due in the subsequent fiscal year. • The Operating Contingency Reserve was established to provide for non-recurring expenditures that were not anticipated when the annual budget and user rates were adopted. The level of this reserve is equal to ten percent of the District's annual operating budget. April 2008 12 G:\Projects (:.910CSp1G¢licerzblea\�WB oCso gevenw Program-0003N.Eoc • The Capital Improvement Reserve was established to fund annual increments of the capital improvement program with a target level at one half of the average annual capital improvement program through FY 2020/21. Levels higher and lower than the target can be expected while the long-term financing and capital improvement programs are being finalized. • The Catastrophic Loss, or Self-Insurance Reserve is established for property damage including fire, Flood and earthquake,general liability, and workers'compensation.The level of reserve in this fund is maintained at a level to fund the District's non-reimbursed costs, which are estimated to be$57 million. • The Short-Term Capital Fund Reserve was created for specific short-term capital improvements such as the Ground Water Replenishment System (GWRS). • The Capital Replacement/Renewal Reserve was established to provide thirty percent of the funding to replace or refurbish the current collection,treatment, and disposal facilities. The current replacement value of these facilities is estimated to be approximately$5.38 billion. The initial reserve level for this fund was established at$50 million and is augmented by interest earnings and a portion of the annual user rate charges. • Debt Service Reserves are controlled by a trustee pursuant to the provisions of certificates of participation issues and is not available for the general needs of the District. • The Rate Stabilization Reserve accumulates all available funds that exceed the targets for all other reserves. The Rate Stabilization Reserve is a separate fund from the Rate Stabilization Account established under the Trust Agreement. These funds are applied to future years'needs and must be maintained at specified levels. There is currently no established target for this reserve. • Adjustments to the total reserves reflect the ability of one reserve to support the requirements of other reserves. Not all reserves will be fully utilized at any given point. 3.3 Findings and Recommendations The results of the revenue requirements are summarized in Table 3.3 Annual rate increases are shown expressed on a percentage basis. April 2008 13 Gvroj cb-CA\OCSOrDeII,meElulMUB OM Rewnu GrWmm-OC M.E Table 3.3 Revenue Requirements(Millions of Dollars) $$ ' Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District $ FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Revenues 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 User Charges $ 185.8 $212.5 $234.6 $259.2 $285.9 Other Operating Revenues 18.5 19.4 21.2 22.7 24.2 Non-Operating Revenues 64.9 68.2 71.6 75.2 78.9 Local Sewer Operating Revenues 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Self-Insurance 2_6 2.6 2_6 2_6 2.6 Total Revenues $273.2 $304.2 $331.5 $361.3 $ 393.3 aExpenditures 3 Ongoing Operating Expenses SOperating Expenses $ 149.0 $ 158.7 $ 169.0 $ 187.5 $ 199.5 g' Other Operating Expenses Self Insurance 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 Debt Service 76.3 90.5 99.8 106.4 112.7 Replacement Funding 1.2 0 0 0.9 3.0 Rate Funded Capital Improvements 24.0 10.8 0 0 0 Bond Coverage Requirements 21.1 49.3 69.8 74.2 78.1 Policy Driven Rate Increase 18.6 13.5 13.7 15.3 25.3 Total Expenditures $292.8 $325.4 $354.9 $386.9 $421.2 Revenue Surplus(Deficiency) $ (19.6) $(21.2) $(23.4) $ (25.6) $(27.9) Projected Rate Increase 10.5 % 10% 10% 9.8 % 9.8 A 'Surplus(Deficiency)before rate increase At the direction of the District, rate increases have been levelized (smoothed),to allow for gradual increase, eliminating significant rate spikes. Rate levelization provides two significant benefits. First, increasing rates over a multi-year period can help reduce rate shock to a utility's customers and allow them to better plan for projected increases. Second, by increasing rates over time in anticipation of large capital expenditures, the District will temporarily generate excess cash reserves through FY 2012/13,which can be used to cash fund a greater portion of the CIP, thus reducing the magnitude and costs of borrowing. Further, bond rating agencies(Moody's, Fitch ICBA, and Standard and Pooris)have placed increasingly greater weight on good business practices when assigning credit ratings. These business practices include, among others, balancing cash and debt financing, as well as the implementation of proactive rate increases, which demonstrate a municipality's commitment to meeting its stated and required level-of-service and environmental objectives. 4.0 RATE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS 4.1 Introduction User rates are developed to equitably allocate costs to users to operate, service debt, and perform repairs and replacements for wastewater collection and treatment systems. There are two different approaches to the rate structure analysis.The first option is to adjust rates on the same percentage basis across the board for all users. The second option is to develop unit costs for each billable constituent:flow, B.O.D.,and T.S.S.and allocate it according to estimated customer usage.The overall procedure used to develop user rate charges for the second option is as follows: • Revenue Needs. Define the annual revenue that must be recovered from user rates and permit users. • Functional Allocation. Determine the percentage allocation of O&M and capital costs to the billable constituents:flow, Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), and Total Suspended Solids(TSS), based upon the existing allocation methodology. • Unit Costs. Develop unit costs for each billable constituent by dividing the total cost allocated to that constituent by the total wastewater flow or loadings of that constituent. • Customer Cateoory Rates. Develop rates for each customer category, by applying unit costs to estimated flows and related loadings for each category. The District collects user rates from property owners through the annual property tax bill distributed by the County throughout the District,except in Revenue Area No. 14. Pursuant to the IRWD Agreement, the District receives payments from the Irvine Ranch Water District(the•IRWD"),which directly collects fees from customers through a monthly billing procedure in Revenue Area No. 14. April 2008 15 c:wMj" .uwesrnoeu e,•m•:uroeo Da.w.,•.v,a,re -a M.mo In May 2007,the Board adopted Ordinance No.OCSD-32 increasing the FY 2007/08 single family residential rate 9.8 percent,from$165.80 to$182.00 per year.This increase was necessary in order to meet the Districts cash flow needs due to the addition of disinfection treatment and other operating requirements. Table 4.1 shows the approved residential rate increases. Table 4.1 User Rate Charges Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District Annual Single Family Percentage Fiscal Year Residence Rate Increase 2007/08 $182.00 9.8% 2008/09' $201.25 10.5% 2009/10` $221.25 10% Source:Ordinance No.OCSD-32. •Proposed. Commercial User Rates. The user rates for commercial categories are based on a multiplier of the Single Family Residential charge. Industrial User Rates.The District charges industrial user rates to customers discharging high-strength or high-volume wastes into the sewer systems. Customers subject to industrial user rates are billed directly by the District. The fee charged to each customer is based on the customer's sewage volume,the concentration of Biochemical Oxygen Demand, and Total Suspended Solids. 4.2 Revenue Needs The revenue needs are defined as the amount of revenues that must be recovered through user rates and permit user charges in order to cover annual expenditures less any offsetting revenues. Offsetting revenues can include interest earnings, IRWD and SAWPA payments, and other non-operating revenues. Expenditures and offsetting revenues for FY 2008/09 are as follows: April 2008 16 cdPmmts-cn10csDOefi.a,amusr 8 ocsD Revenue P,,mm-NMW.mo Table 4.2 Expenditures and Offsetting Revenues (Millions of Dollars) Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District FY 2008 Expenditures 2009 Ongoing Operating Expenses Operating Expenses $ 14g 0 Other Operating Expenses Self Insurance 2.6 Debt Service 76.3 Replacement Funding 1.2 Rate Funded Capital Improvements 24.0 Bond Coverage Requirements 21.0 Policy Driven Rate Increases 18.6 Less Offsetting Revenues Revenues from other Districts (10.9) Other Operating Revenues (18.5) Non-Operating Revenues (64.9) Local Sewer Operating Revenue (1,4) Self-Insurance Total Revenue Needs: $194.4 In FY 2008/09, $194.4 million must be recovered through user rates and permit user charges to cover the District's annual expenditures. 4.3 Functional Allocation To develop the second option,the District's existing allocation methodology was used as the basis to develop user rates. Bartle Wells Associates reviewed the District's allocation and concurred that the allocation was reasonable. Their findings are documented in the 2006 report, "Review of Rates and Charges Report." To develop user rates, unit rates per unit of flow, BOD, and TSS are applied to standard flow and loading factors developed for most customer categories. Users with unusually high flows and/or strength of wastewater, known as"Permit Users,"are charged based on measured wastewater Bows and strengths. Table 4.3 presents a summary of the allocation percentage basis: April 2008 17 G 1PnKW- OCSD Revenue Prtpmm-INKNOW.da Table 4.3 Allocation Percentage Basis Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District Description Flow BOD TSS Treatment Expenditures 23% 32% 45% Plant-in-Service 57% 28% 15% CIP 46% 34% 19% Non-Assignable Costs 33% 34% 33% Table 4.4 illustrates how projected FY 2008/09 expenditures and offsetting revenues are allocated to flow, BOD,and TSS, based on the allocation percentages listed above. Table 4.4 Functional Allocation of Costs Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District Functional Allocation Expenditures Flow BOD TSS Ongoing Operating Expenses (in million$) $ 149.0 23% 32% 45% As Treatment Operating Expenses Expenditures Other Operating Expenses Self-Insurance 2.6 33% 34% 33% As All Others New Debt Service 8.3 35% 51% 15% As FY 2008/09 CIP Existing Debt Service 68.0 44% 37% 19% As Old Debt Service Replacement Funding 1.2 57% 28% 15% As Plant-InService Rate Funded Capital 24.0 46% 34% 19% Improvements As CIP Bond Coverage 21.0 46% 34% 19% Requirements As CIP Policy Driven Rate 18.6 33% 34% 33% Increases As All Others Less Offsetting Revenues Revenues from other (10.9) 33% 34% 33% Districts As All Others Other Operating (18.5) 33% 34% 33% Revenues As All Others Non-Operating Revenues (64.9) 33% 34%^ 33% As All Others Local Sewer Fee (1.4) 33% 34% 33% As All Others Self-insurence (2.6) 33% 34% 33% As All Others Subtotals: $ 194.4 $62.9 $67.1 $64.4 April 2008 18 G; ) -CAWCSD1oeIlwreWn12W8 OM R.nu.Pw.re -09034 A. 4.4 Unit Costs Residential and Commercial User Rates Calculation Residential and commercial user rates are calculated on an EDU base charge. Each residential and commercial category has a defined flow and strength(BOD and TSS) assumption. To develop user rates, unit rates per unit of flow, BOD, and TSS are applied to standard flow and loading factors developed for most customer categories. a) EDU Defined Equivalents Calculation. The number of existing users was determined using a fee-based approach. The number of EDUs was determined by taking the total revenue and dividing by the Single Family Residential rate of the same year. The projected number of customers served by the District for the Fiscal Year 2008109, identified in EDUs, is 982,365. Table 4.5 presents flow and load information from the District's plants for FY 2006/07. Table 4.5 Total Flow and Load Information Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District BOD Load TSS Load Description Flow(mgd) (ppd) (ppd) OCSO users 205 460,000 415.000 The flows and loadings per EDU estimated to be treated by the District in FY 2006/07 are shown in Table 4.6. Table 4.6 Flow and Load per EDU (FY 2008/09) Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District BOD T86 Concentration Concentration Flow (SOD/EDU (TSS/EDU Description flow/EDU [gpd]) [mg/LD [mg/L EDU Equivalent Calculations (w/o SAWPA, IRWD or 210 254 256 Sunset Beach) b) Total Annual Flow and Loads Calculation. Based on these flows and loadings,the totals are shown in Table 4.7. April 2008 19 cv,"- ocso ft..P� -awoe.aoc Table 4.7 Total Annual Flow and Loads(FY 2008109) Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District Description Flow(1,000 gal) BOD Load (Ibs) TSS Load (Ibs) Customer Information 74,900,000 167,800,000 151,600,000 Total Annual Flow and Loads c) Unit Cost Calculation. The unit cost was calculated by taking the cost allocations for flow, BOD and TSS, and dividing it by the total annual flow and loads.Table 4.8 presents the unit cost per flow, BOD and TSS. Table 4.8 Unit Cost Calculation (FY 2008109) Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District Flow BOD TSS Cost Allocation $62.9 million $67.0 million $64.4 million - Total Flow(1,000 gal) Total B.O.D. (Ibs) Total T.S.S. (Ibs) Total Annual Flow and Loads 74,900,000 167,800,000 151,600,000 _ $11,000 gals $/lb B.O.D $/lb B.O.D Unit Costs $0.84 $ 0.40 $ 0.42 4.5 Customer Category Rates The single-family residential (SFR)user rate is based on typical flow and loadings for an average 3-bedroom home and serves as the base rate to calculate rates for other users. Users are charged a percentage of the SFR rate as specified in Ordinance No. OCSD-32, the Fees and Charges Ordinance. These use factors are based on the average flaw and strength characteristics for the type of property, charged on a per 1,000 square-foot basis. Eg. 1: Multi-family residential with factor 0.7 Annual cost: $201.25 X 0.7 =$140.88 Eg.2: Neighborhood shopping center with factor 1.39 Annual cost:$20125 X 1.39=$279.74 Eg. 3:Take-out restaurant with factor 3.0 Annual rost: $201.25 X 3.0 =$603.75 April 2008 PO o:Wlge 'Q4I00MWM-bI--=D9 oCSD R.wnu PIII..-M308 dm 4.5.1 Industrial User Rates The District's industrial users are charged for wastewater services based on measured flow, BOD,and TSS.As with residential and commercial customers, industrial customers'user rates are derived from base unit costs. Unlike residential and commercial customers, in which the usage is not individually metered,wastewater metering and samples are available for industrial customers.Additionally, industrial customers are provided individual ad valorem tax credits against their calculated wastewater bills, while this tax credit is reflected in the base unit cost for all other user classes. Table 4.9 below illustrates the District's current industrial unit charges in FY 2007/08. Table 4.9 Current Industrial User Sewer Service Charges(FY 2007/08) Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District $/ 1,000 gals $I Ibs 13.0.13 $/Ibs T.S.S. Unit Costs $0.77 $0.35 $0.52 (1)Charges are based on"gross oostof-service"prior to individual tax credits. During the 2006 rate update, the Board adopted an across-the-board rate increase for industrial users and retained the tax credits.While these charges were different than the calculated oostof-service rates, the Finance,Administration, and Human Resources (FAHR)Committee(now the Administration Committee)concluded that the implementation of full cost-of-service rates posed too significant of a cost shift for some industrial customers at that time. Consequently, the FAHR directed staff to revisit this issue during the next rate study. User Charge Structure The existing industrial rate structure is referred to as"gross"cost-of-service. Under this approach,these unit rates do not account for ad valorem taxes the industrial customers have contributed. Rather,as noted above, an industrial customers bill is calculated and then ad valorem taxes are credited against that bill.Alternatively,the District could impose a "net"cost-of-service rate,which recognizes ad valorem taxes by reducing the unit costs. Consequently,the end user would not receive an individual tax credit,and would rather benefit from the total taxes contributed by all users through lower unit rates. As noted,the existing industrial rates are not in line with cost-of-service requirements because they were developed by applying an across-the-board increase. The rates moderately undercharge industrial users.Additionally,they do not fully reflect the relative cost differences in treating flow, BOD,and TSS. April 2008 21 D: -CMOCSMM.b'.�B oCSD R..Pag,en-BIDBOB.Eoc Table 4.10 below illustrates what the proposed"gross"cost-of-service rates would be if they were In line with oostof-service requirements.As illustrated,the unit costs for flow and BOD have increased relative to the existing industrial rates, but have decreased for TSS. Table 4.10 Gross Cost of Service (FY 2008/09) Revenue Program and Rate Update Oran a Co!n Sanitation District 8/1,000 gals $/Ibs B.O.D. $/Ibs T.S.S. Unit Costs $0.86 $0.41 I $0.43 (1)Charges are based on"gross cost-of-service" prior to Individual tax credits. The process of administering annual tax credits does create an added burden on District staff. Consequently,the District should consider implementing "net cost-ofservice"rates. The net unit costs, as presented in Table 4.11 below, already account for ad valorem taxes contributed by District users. Moreover, net cost-of-service rates are calculated taking Into account total ad valorem tax revenues and treat industrial users as equal beneficiaries of the total tax revenues. Consequently, net cost-of-service for industrial customers is commensurate with all other system users. Table 4.11 Not Cost of Service (FY 2008109) Revenue Program and Rate Update Oran Coun Sanitation District $/1,000 gals $/Ibs B.O.D. $/Ibs T.S.S. unit costa $0.84 $0.46 $0.42 (1)Charges are based on"net costof-service"excluding Individual tax credits. In 2006, the FAHR Committee expressed concern about the shift in costs for some of the District's industrial users with a "net-cost-of-service" reallocation.Consequently, at the direction of District staff, a phased process was evaluated. Under consideration, industrial users with bills that would increase by 20%and $1,000 would have the rate change phased in over a 5-year period,creating a subsidy.This subsidy would be paid for by all other users (residential, commercial, and industrial). Flowever, a subsidy of this type might not be allowed under Proposition 218. Applying this subsidy to both the"net-cost-of-service"and the"gross-cost-of-service"rate structures and including the across-the-board rate increase allowed us to evaluate 5 different industrial rate alternatives. Table 4.12 provides a comparison of the industrial rate alternatives explored as part of this study, and delineates the advantages and disadvantages of each. April 2008 Y4 G.FFQ*U-C OCBUGH1wmb1nUW8 MW RBwnw PM,010 .ft Table 4.12 Industrial User Rate Structure Alternatives Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District D Description Tax Advantages Disadvantages ��. Credit Current Rates Across-the-board rate yes ' Consistent with current rates. ' Non-compliant with Prop 218 s increase. (Bighorn Case July 2006) f§g: •Undercharges the majody of users. aCostofService Alternative t Gross Cost-of-Service Costof-service rates with yes 'Cost-of-service basis. ' Different rate methodology for all other Individual tax credits, ratepayers. o 'Some users experience rate spikes. Administrative cost burden to provide tax credit. £ Net CostofService Costof-service rates exdudinc no 'Uniform rate methodology. 'Some users experience rate spikes. individual tax credits. •Cost-of-service basis. Reduces stag cost and time requirement. 8 R Subsidy Altemative Gross Cost-of-Service Cost-of-service rates with yes 'Cost-of-service basis. ' Inequity in billing rates among permitees. individual tax credits. Rate •Might violate Prop 218. subsidies for users exceeding 20%and$1.000 increase. 'Different rate methodology for all other ratepayers. Subsidy of industrial users • Some users experience rate spikes. • Administrative cost burden to provide tax credit. Net Cost-of-Service Cost-of-service rates exdudino rto •Uniform rate methodology. • Inequity in billing rates among permitees. individual tax credits. Rate •Cost-of-service basis. •Might violate Prop 218. subsidies for users exceeding 20%and$1,000 increase. 'Reduces staff cost and time • S of industrial users. requirement. •Some users experience rate spikes. N W After review of the industrial rate alternatives,the District staff decided to recommend net cost-of-service rates for industrial customers.This approach places industrial customers on an equal basis as all other customer Gasses and adheres to Proposition 218 requirements. Additionally, shifting from gross oost-of-service to net cost-of-service will reduce staff resource requirements for administering industrial rates. 4.6 Findings and Recommendations It is recommended that the District adopt a user rate of$201.25 per EDU per year for FY 2008/09, based upon a 10.50 percent across the board increase. In subsequent years,we recommend that the District increase user rates between 9.8 percent and 10 percent annually, as illustrated in Table 4.13. Table 4.13 Projected User Rates Revenue Program and Rate Update Orange County Sanitation District Annual Single Family Percentage Fiscal Year Residence Rate Increase 2007-08 $182.50 9.8% 2008-09 $20125 10.5% 2009-10 $221.25 10.0% 2010-11 $243.50 10.0% 2011-12 $267.25 9.80% 2012-13 $293.50 9.80% Finally, it is recommended that the District implement the"net"cost-of-service rates for pennitee users. This approach offers several advantages. Net cost-of-service rates would implement uniform rates for all customers classes, is based on cost-of-service principles, equitably recovers expenditures for permitees, and reducing staffing costs and administrative time.The other four methods evaluated as part of this study,do not provide these same advantages. Moreover, with the exception of the base"gross"cost-of-service approach, these alternative options do violate or might violate Proposition 218 requirements. Table 4.14 presents the industrial user rates under the recommended"net" cost-cost-service method. April 2008 24 cu"q - ocsD aewnu Pm m-wmw.ac Table 4.14 Industrial User Rates (FY 2008/09) Net Cost of Service Revenue Program and Rate Update Omni Coun Sanitation District $/1,000 gals $/Ibs B.O.D. $/Ibs T.S.S. unit Costs $0.84 $0.40 $0.42 (1)Charges are based on*net oosto/-service excluding individual tax its. 5.0 CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE ANALYSIS 5.1 Introduction Capital Facilities Capacity Charges are one-8me fees paid at the time property is developed and connected to the Wastewater System. The fees are levied to pay a portion of the District's capital costs and for access to capacity in the Wastewater System. Currently,the District has Capital Facilities Capacity Charges of$4,517 per residential unit (three- bedroom)and$1,357 per 1,000 square feet for an average demand commercial and industrial user. These fees are based on the 2006 study findings delineated below, and were increased with construction cost inflation to get the FY 2007108 values of$4,517 and $1,357. Under the current industrial use ordinance, additional CFCCs, referred to as Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges, can be imposed on industrial users who place larger than average demands on the Wastewater System. Capital Facilities Capacity Charges are reviewed annually to reflect the changes in the value of the Wastewater System to which a new customer is connecting. CFCCs are designed to recover capital costs of providing capacity for new users.They are used to fund future capacity expansion projects.The underlying premise is to charge each new user the estimated reasonable cost of providing capital facilities necessary to provide wastewater service(i.e., require growth to pay for growth).Absent such charges, existing customers would be required to bear the burden of all capital costs, including capacity- related costs,through rates. Consequently, new customers would receive the benefit of sewer availability,without themselves paying for that capacity. Similar to the District's user rates, the base CFCC is equal to the capital costs required to support the wastewater flows and loadings estimated for an average 3-bedroom single- family residence, or per Equivalent Dwelling Unit(EDU). Other residential rates are calculated relative to this base charge, based upon the assumed flows and loading. Commercial and industrial CFCCs are calculated in units of CFCC per 1,000 square feet. Permit Users are subject to a supplemental charge based on the expected flows and loadings in excess of the maximum allowed for under base commercial industrial CFCCs. The supplemental charge is equal to the unit cost of flow. BOD, and TSS capacity. Permit April 2008 25 x;:T,q -cnwrsrnrx� ocso ae.enue P�m-()4[MM.ea Users are also subject to increases in CFCCs ti flows and/or loadings significantly exceed the amount of capacity previously allocated and paid for,at the same rate as the supplemental charges described above. Pursuant to an agreement with the IRWD, IRWD pays CFCC charges based on a different methodology from other large dischargers into the system. IRWD and OCSD are currently renegotiating the terms of this agreement. 5.2 Findings and Recommendations As part of the 2008 Revenue Program and Rate Update, the CFCCs that were developed in 2006 were reevaluated. This review was intended to validate that the current CFCC methodology was still equitable and recovered an appropriate share of system costs from new development. The current methodology calls for the CFCC to be increased by construction cost inflation, except when major changes in the CIP or growth assumptions occur. These types of changes typically occur when a strategic plan update is performed. Since a strategic plan update has not occurred and major CIP and growth assumptions have not changed since 2006, it is recommended that the District maintain the current CFCC and SCFCC,adjusted for construction cost inflation.Additionally, it is recommended that the District continue to annually adjust the CFCC and SCFCC based on construction cost inflation, until major changes in the CIP or growth assumptions occur. The next major changes in the CIP or growth assumptions would likely occur when another strategic plan update is completed. The recommended charges are presented in Table 5.1. Table 5.1 Recommended FY 2008/09 CFCC and SCFCC Revenue Program and Rate Update Oran gee County Sanitation District Total Flow B.O.D. T.S.S. Per EDU Residential CFCC $4,671 Per 1,000 sq ft Commercial- Industrial CFCC $1.403 Per Gallon Per lbs. Per lbs. SCFCC $0.001440 $0.808563 $0.098262 5.3 Green Building User Rates and CFCCs Green Buildings are designed to generate less of an environmental impact than other traditional buildings. These impacts are defined as resource demands, including materials, power consumption, water usage,and wastewater/garbage production. This section April 2008 26 G:WJa -rAbCMeirveraMes� H C=Revenue Prpm-O W.E explores what the District currently does for"green" users and what limitations exist for implanting additional green user rates and CFCCs. 5.3.1 LEED Guidelines The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)program provides a benchmark for evaluating potential water usage reductions.The LEED rating system is the nationally accepted benchmark for determining the measurable Impact that a building has on the environment. LEED has established five credits that can be obtained through water efficiency.The credits available for water efficiency are as follows: ♦ Credit 1.1 — Reduce potable water consumption for irrigation by 50%. ♦ Credit 1.2—No potable water use for Irrigation (use of captured rainwater, recycled wastewater, etc.),or no irrigation at all. ♦ Credit 2—Use of Innovative wastewater technologies (Water closets, low flow toilets, capture rainwater, recycled graywater, on-site municipally treated water).An additional credit Is available under the Innovation in Design category. ♦ Credit 3.1 —Reduce water usage by 20%(Includes water closets, urinals, lavatory faucets, showers and kitchen sinks only). ♦ Credit 3.2—Reduce water usage by 30%(includes water closets, urinals, lavatory faucets, showers and kitchen sinks only). Credits for water conservation are most commonly recognized by the water purveyor with reduction of peak water usage(water consumed above the annual average). Typically, peak usage has high unit costs because an agency must provide the capacity necessary to meet the peak demand,while that rapacity is underutilized. 5.3.2 Green User Rates Proposition 218 states, in relevant part"no assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel."In other words, ratepayers must pay their fair share. Stated another way, no public policy consideration may affect rates other than the"proportional special benefit conferred" upon a ratepayer. This would seem to clearly exclude direct consideration of environmental responsibility in the DistricPs rate mechanism. Or course, to the extent that a customer is "green"from a wastewater standpoint,the reduction in the production of wastewater should be directly reflected in the rate the customer pays.This means that the District should evaluate the ability of a prospective user to meet the LEED guidelines based on wastewater returned to the sewer. Since wastewater flow is directly related to water use, the most efficient way to do this would be to charge user rates based on water consumption. The District has evaluated this on several occasions over the past 10 years and found that it April 2008 27 GOPr,ge -CAIOCSIM.M.M.0008 OCSO R...Pr r.-NOMA. would be particularly difficult because the District's customers are served by over 30 separate water purveyors. Consequently, the District does not monitor individual water usage. As a result,the District implemented the current EDU user rate structure, which provides an assumed water usage based on the type of property and the square footage (for commercial users). Additionally, through ordinance, the District currently allows all users (including "green" users)to present their water bills in order to illustrate a reduced water usage. They also provide permitted users who pretreat their flow, a reduction in user charges because their flow and loads on the system are reduced. These existing procedures provide a mechanism for"green"type users to reduce their wastewater user charges,without violating Proposition 218, placing an undue burden on District staff, or placing the District in a"policing position"necessarily monitoring individual water usage. 5.3.3 Green CFCCs The District's CFCC is a development fee within the meaning of the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code§66000 et seq.). It is only imposed on projects for construction or reconstruction. Government Code§66000 states, in relevant part, "Development project' includes a project involving the Issuance of a permit for construction or reconstruction ..." Government Code §66001(b)states, in relevant part, "[i]n any action imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project by a local agency, the local agency shall determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee Is imposed."This is the articulation In a different context of the "Fair share" concept also established in Proposition 218 and results in the same limitations on the District. This means that for prospective users to get a"green"CFCC, they would have to show that their connection to the system would meet the LEED guidelines described above and at the same time comply with Government Code§66000. There are two ways for a prospective user to accomplish this. First, the prospective user could perform treatment at their site. Because of regulatory and cost constraints, this could only feasibly and cost effectively be done by a large commercial or industrial user. Moreover,several industrial users served by the District have on-site treatment.Additionally,the District's SCFCC,which is Imposed on users exceeding their allotted capacity within the system, also provides an incentive to all users to reduce their wastewater discharges.When they do reduce this discharge they are charged less,thus getting a "green" CFCC. The other way a discharger could meet LEED guidelines with respect to the District is by installing water efficient fixtures. For example, by installing water saver toilets, sinks, and showers, wastewater flow from a discharger would be reduced. Since all building departments in the District service area already require water saver fixtures,they are already accounted for in the CFCC. April 2008 28 c:w,"lean cnhocso�o"nv","ci"somas ocso ae.e"oe vrc,srem-amoe.aa 5.3.4 Findinas and Recommendations Due to the limitations of Proposition 218 and Government Code§66000,the District does not have discretion to offer discounts to"green"users on their user rates or CFCCs. However,the District already has policies in place that allow"green"users to have reduced charges. In conclusion,the District's existing rate reductions (based on actual water usage)currently provide a sound mechanism for"green"users and all other low wastewater dischargers to reduce their charges through a cost based approach. April 2008 29 cw qo .cnwcsm MM blm�gocso ft. wPm -a Wdw Appendix A PROJECT CALCULATIONS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT RATE STUDY ANALYSIS Summary Cash Flow Projections moos E p u Fly1V}DV 2012 BJ a..MBUM iBB! Iv19 B4L+ i4ll 3413 Rrvn 1 GewtlUurfep 161,W1A}x }lo"AWI }}B,WIIBJ }]o.5]lf}J }1AB]IBIB IOIfAOA PermNlp Uen hn N,bl.11l 11,15A5]1 I},lN,}]} 103q,N0 II J No .FIj. A%yV &.Nowt 0A1060. ]t,ow 15,1]i I. lAp]p.115 5 11 wC0>lerwr xM0]OMJ 1]]RO.oW 110 D>],LW 93Atl.OW BB,WJ.pOO xlR IX 11%I LLB)0105 IB IY3,]p} xl,r0],115 R1355Po ]1A5.]W Conne[Ibn fees Ap}.01J x3,B1]50! x1,Ir0100 }SJEVn al.r. OPx Rweren )1]B.0)0 N,0]]3w ]S,BIII= ]]<05.ul wIll.BW 0 Rnnun Splplf.p51 Sy,erBBBI W0859 e00 5r0 BlOSlx SSS VABW IIDw vekw ne llwl.nu B1[ruul p Opxd Me%p wI MAxf Moss". IM.111NB 1BB.A],Wo M].NS.SW l0 'M ftm rwx II Prtpnm ] 1A]p]0 ]]Soro.n1 Ie0.owwo ux,1N n! 19.1N,}!) 1 COP WXe06 oe 1,151.0x3 f.CW,PIII ].IIIIO W] 12.SM,}N 1} COP 9ervke 130%.]OM) 1B]1)]36 BO.SN.IpS BB BA,B]1 100,]S1 W. fl}.itOBl] .1.1R.III Rwvyemrin. n Glnerew+N.mn1e 2 e11W1 2,011,eW 2eue90 AuaeW 2e1A0W 11 R.pNnilunn 6810&B]0 IBB.W],]N 1583]SBl1 90},OLSB4 118R]l AB IS MnnuwRpulremnry R.p$091 ".110.]]I 1}4]931 MWABY UIII I. Amm Oww"nM. 10 ...1 YBol V.er 111.O50.Mx 111711112.1 111211.1. MI A1]M 301,NA)]1 sot.11 1. 1] EN o1Vw 1111}p1! ltY.lxl]W Y1,x1B 3]) 1B1 iN.e]] 0.]0,1W)]p 10 Reserve Porry 130.243912 1p](31. aw.1.1 530}5].1Y SIABSIw. Ertew'U'.1101n It... )11p0!] lo.2o I. N.510.3w eB5}A913 w"11W 0-,9_,Vm fees'. 19 PVB Sm Mnuel Uw In ] 20121 ! .125 3 M]b ! $111 $ N]W x0 PelCnlp.cn.ye lo.w% 10W% 10W% gam 9W% x1 EquMwm OMSryum. 0e2.3ee swul ... 1.000.12B 1woo. 21 SIR IIWW fx e1.Jn Uaw 11.2N 0ew ]3]es z) Oma.nxmro elAIUSVN S1480.098196 e111.R1,40 lvu..A. SUCO.leln Ra NficS ]I WA MYw Owepp 1..1.11. 7B11111 .."1..1 O.1.020 pk1M.191 3! f0%+XI Vev 01I*""B ;:"two 13Mi Q9 10..1103 11.100 1AMIN 30 1W%IDIeVw AVGCOP 3n. 101;;,aA W0b.10! BBBw,9]1 1o1 M10e1 113.if0 en ]i W%nmpe ClP nlb)WO 1A043.W1 ]O)SLIW 1]10, +1.011,us SOIA.OeI 20 SMn OM CP,-S 30 Do.0lo%O'-V ON 1.711 W) ll.wa.@o II,"1 ! 1.3 11W301 IIO W1.BI] 10 9fl®Slim.INNT 11 wowO olool I,ow Siow. 31WOW0 ]1 R"RNw0®]%M 55,}01.p0 W.IA21 !].INSB] Is.ow KIM 020 lgW.lm.m <O,WOWo .I.ow. -4o...0 �Iw000 0 aIIN.oW u ]mn 130}n91x 1u W]WB WAee1110 I'l.ea Sy.pW,a C.P.I. R 9r Uen Cwxw.M,,1 Io }1J 1B5 1Is M 1.n }01 N sM.1 Ce,l}5 }1) I05 Its Nn Rermwalw nllw 10}BSB 017 11),!17 M3 1W,pe].171 Mib1.ON R+,WpW Stllenemlu 1. Ig w Ill 1.5 "120.031 IOAb1dW 112710.012 A-1 AI3rzGGB ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT . MTE OUDY Mw VSPS IBYUMGMMS 6y1xYe1'stllbml ®mnwrwi awrwmm xa+e+xR.]err m t�utamxnapvmn ¢ev �m s....e�ws.mwm wa sewo.w awwww ruaMMamri mf mAmEw.�� a ]Le Walm011 601 Wamyneg0.9}I RW m•mnmwrx 4eumlwwEY mmue Nmnp TM WNYmwmA u�% emry� ]m AT CAR 0.M l8M IY% xIMYa xMemmmxf mYmu mnvprm 6mtlCeo emtri Cm 4an ¢M n�E.mm"" in :w iw imp Em C¢% am aoR ¢aR ¢¢x om ¢¢R Tw ErpvuMxme �IACY IAOIf nWm Md¢ WA Mpvwn.muuau ]YI • Iba�+C�.mauxu • q�ywu.•wmav n Ueanww�¢wu �xm RW LLMt Ym LLm C } avm ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT aAre aruar u Y*ls MM STUW iw' mli NmFAFeom eDAD WAD Halals NMItlYe ]Atl ]AH ly6 mA0]B ' CmmmN Wlll eYpx WAtf ilGpl SI1,V IAp ]W SDM SAD GpFSWM Syi SMl SW SY xYx tl MnYEM dYl DAII Y,tl] pall NbetlW TeeEWe eC,W DSVI MAD ldtlli 1,(q]9 imEMYYE4mNePDF SNSL DPAte o3W WAD e11M OMA�m YaseW A]tlnY y{y ]3 YIeD Iq Pe�F�rvraaFmi.F fm�wilP�N�m~i1¢� Ii.W fI.IF llsl� Mi t�An NntlCRCMme MIM1 Waliae Yl,u�us IA.gxY AmFIECeCCM�r lTW9Mx ISaL.Ix Ss.IW Y MFn]a ie.l¢4¢u swrsm���mmF tl Wx Wlry l4geM WIGYYmMIFaTA u'noea WlW eMutMglmpl lil SI EEvwFSMlbgµYleWy Wtl eooiMl �]aM EFie WF+Fe000.uM.DouroA IEEIMI YM tlM ewMbSeoovupwlsvggpeWl Po�FMtgOauleMmeFxM DIRI ePE�bES+�FlnfabeFYn FgbMEDe W me WpM W ENl 0YI] LLeim FBCOYN W IglwaaeaeYMMatNPEW.IIs�f W✓MI 6eMFFDE Wx1 FMl� WSIFwYeYilbMl xm�F.engtivc.e.FF.�gA Y,F uceW nADw 1aw,W wwl..n.DFw ]s]3]D F]DtlMI PMI PMI IAW SEBpM ]SD] pDl EDMMN W�1®miASYn pewFFKU pp mIYgLMMa WtlFM}YYRYwN'wY Omq Fltlrylq euYmRyLmuWFnwwMFlgYf p'.NWN•ew gnA�fFMlFUCSMemFen WYM S.IY �eeAWgCSFFDeOxFtlMn OmAFIW IMII SAD MneEbMmmmmsOMWYMFp omgFAE11W1 i.ly 4FmebMmmmwMn[YYmp FmranMtluwNFm.m.W ]nl A-] m ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MTe Maya Vsls dYUYAgN4 PICCNWYMPW IuwllexlabW dxT d+T Rru4 Pmnn r»» n2er ]In rwi nn iw Ylnmul Rw R01 ROr PO% vd cuxay uW ne% !w f]aeor,rWW Yx.eeneq Rs 6JY exYNaom w vn wr rwax n.v fY ]MU Mbn�n O�YG PIp!!y5 BeYmeufm,.uepery un ym nuye xr c»aniwuexNum uen qeW IW rA!n MI6WWbMOroNW lANgll uwnerlem Yx WPOY.PDUeWriryfuMmMmu1.0. INM1W EW LenpeMrRNtl WmxYlimml ].wqn ILPe y PMR4ClWe Mr» GnmxYRw I4LIVIIAI ll.Y11 R9/PmIeDUmie ].NO mwaMae W6YLYi6 Y.f]Y manYWe ero,fm im an Y,onm Orr[<pmR4�BSY1ex gtl.Mw].w mT[^ielWwNn�Yl¢l ]Y P�uew�.�r.Yrwev�sgru ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT RATE STUDY ANALYSIS Capital Funding 6 Fund Reserves CAPITAL FUNDING REPLACEMENTISYSTEMWIDE IMPROVEMENTS 11Y3001, FYeOM FY 2010 FY 2011 FYM12 Capital Expenditures 20M 2010 2011 2012 2013 R&R l System-Wide Improvements 9 2]2.]16.042 $ 194.750.462 $ 160,040.300 S 167289,382 $ 1T1 d33.280 Expansion Projects 92.073.994 40,339.312 27.079.477 17.872,593 26.923,197 Total CIP Expenditures S 364790,036 S 235,089.A4 S 187,119,M S 185,161,975 S 198,3%.478 Local Sewer Capital Replacement 4611094 4.611.094 4AW094 4.611.094 d611.094 Total Capital Expenditures $369.401.130 $239,700.W9 $191,720,871 $189,n3,069 $202,96].5]2 (NaW CIP total tram Mikes Cash Flaw Budge412/1 ill (07MB CIP total from Bunoes FYN-09 Jan Est) (R&R and Expansion break downs for 0692-071(16 are based on breakdown of current CIP) 120011 FY Aq "Me FY3011 FY M12 Available Revenues(Capital) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 IRWD Equity Payment S 15.376.705 $ 10,336.0W S 9,007,000 $ 9,641.000 S 8,883000 Local Sewer Capital Funding S 4,611,W4 S 4,611,094 S 4.611.094 $ 4,611.094 $ 4.611,094 CFCCs 26A56742 28.167.944 27.079.477 17,872.593 26.923.197 Grants 2,448.887 6.149.n5 5,873,W 5,828.342 5.769.051 Developer Contributions - - - -Use of Non-Revenue Bond Debt Proceeds - - - -Use of COP Proceeds 2W,000,000 173,000,000 110,000,000 95,000,000 96,000.000 Use of Capital Reserves 40.940.971 6,600.491 35,160.255 51.020.039 607812W Rate Funded Capital 23.966731 10,8W,614 S 36%401.130 S 239,700.869 S 191,130.871 $ 189.)]3069 $ W2,%7.572 12... FY]009 Fir"he FYm" FY 21112 Reserves 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Use of Reserves FY 2001 FY 2009 FY2010 FY off FY 2012 Bond I..... 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Cops S 256.000.000 $ 173000.000 S 110.000.000 S 95.000.000 $ 96000'" Mistrials Loans(Traditional Structure) -Debt Service Payments Begin(Fiscal Year Eadirgf Mistrials Loans(Level PM01pal Payments) (COP..,.a..s urdated m malts Mlke's on IMN17) FY 20W FY 2009 Fr 2010 FY2011 FY 1.12 Available Revenues 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 -Granls'Annexation Fecil GWRS Reimbursement S 2448.887 9 6.149.n5 $ 5,873,044 S 5,628.342 $ 5.769,051 -Deveoper Contributions - - - - RESERVE REQUIREMENT A-5 41312008 alORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT e� RATE STUDY ANALYSIS Capital Funding&Fund Reserves FY MOB FY 2001 FY seta FY 2011 FY 2012 Operating Fund 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Cash Flow Reserve -50%Operating Expenditures 50% If 74,507,510 E 79.337,142 $ 84,485,825 E 93,725.028 $ 99.765,191 -Annual Debt Service 76.317.356 9D,524,705 99,829,931 106,351.568 112,71D,672 Operating Contingency -10%Operating Expenditures 10% 14,901,502 15.867,428 16.897,165 16,897.165 18,745,006 Capital Improvement Reserve -50%Annual Average CIP 50% 78,602,001 75,356,760 73,701,931 71,814,025 68,773.557 Self-Insurance -$57 Million 57,000.000 57,000,000 57,00D,000 57,000,000 57,000,000 Certificate of Participation Reserve -10%of Outstanding COPS 10% 133,711.503 148.909,820 157,332,545 163,860,203 170,201.873 -less:Reserve for Debt Retirement- Capital Replacement Reserve 55,204,040 56.308.121 67,434.283 58,582,969 59754.628 Adjustments (40,000,00D1 (40.000,000I (40,000,000I (40,Doo.0001 (40,000,0001 Ending Fund Balance S 450,243,912 $ 40,303,976 $ 506,681,679 $ 528,230,958 $ 546,950,926 (Updated Reserve Ealances 1 V 10) -Bond reserve becomes arallaele for final year debt service payment FUND RESERVES OPERATING&CAPITAL RESERVES FY 20M FY 2009 FY 2010 FYM11 FY 2012 Operating&Capital Fund 2009 2010 2011 2D12 2013 Beginning Balance E 491,184,883 $ 489.904.467 $ 546,104,438 $ 597,170,760 E 543,086,705 IRWD Equity Payments 15,376,705 10,336,0DO 9,007,000 9,641,M0 8.883,000 Local Sewer Capital Funding 4.611,094 4,611.094 4,611,094 4,611.094 4,611,094 Gfents 2,448.887 6.149.725 5,873,044 5,628,342 5769,051 Developer Contributions - - - - - CFCC&SCFCC Revenues' 26,056742 28,167,944 29,732,619 31,364,411 33.128.183 Bond Proceeds 256,000,000 173,000,000 110.MD,D00 95,000,000 96,000.000 Ideal Use of Funds (345,434,399) (228,1365,254) (191730,871) (189,773.069) 1202,967,572) plus cash now 39,660,555 62,800,462 83,573,436 89,424,166 103.461,164 Ending Fund Balance $ 489,904,467 $ 546,104,438 $ 597.170760 E 643,086705 $ 691,971,626 A-6 4/312008 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT RATE STUDY ANALYSIS Debt Service TOTAL DEBT SERVICE "Mae la"I'D fY 2010 try 20++ %2012 Total Debt Sarylce 20M 2010 2011 2012 2013 Principal Payments $ 21.994,970 $ 26,626,775 $ 30.236,415 $ 32,979,031 $ 36,062.917 Interest Payments 54,322,386 63,897,930 69,593,516 73,372,537 76,647,755 Total Annual Payments $ 76.317.356 $ 90,524,705 $ 99,829.931 $ 106,351,568 $ 112,71D,672 Added Reserve Requirement $0 SO $0 $0 $0 COP Debt Service Prncipal Payments S 21,994,970 $ 26,626.775 S 30,236.415 $ 32.979.031 S 36,062,917 Interest Payments 54,322,386 63,697,930 6%593,516 73,372,537 76,647,755 Total Annual Payments $ 76,317,356 $ 90,524,705 $ 99,829.931 $ 106,351,568 $ 112.710,672 Outstanding COPs $ 1.337,115,030 $ 1,489,096.196 $ 1,573,325.449 $ 1,638,602,030 $ 1,902,018,733 EXISTING DEBT SERVICE FT MW F 20010 ry2010 "2011 %2012 Total Existing Debt 2008 2010 2011 2012 2013 Principal Payments $ 20,065,000 $ 21,365,000 $ 22.575,000 $ 23,385,000 $ 24,545,000 Interest Payments 47,911.136 48,835,679 45,696,864 44,711,445 43,668,864 Total Annual Payments $ 67.976.136 S 68,200,679 $ 68,271,854 $ 68,096,445 $ 68,213.864 1992 Refunding(All 1986 8 Series 8 Term) Principal Payments $ 14,110,ODO S 15,060,000 $ 16,015,000 $ 5,145.00D $ 6,970,000 Interest Payments 3.574.524 2,743,088 1.858.672 1,522,851 1,144,456 Total Annual Payments $ 17,684.524 $ 17,003,088 $ 17,873,672 $ 6.667,851 $ 8,114,456 1993 Refunding(Series 8 Term) Principal Payments $ 150.000 $ 160,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,OOD $ 200,000 Interest Payments 1220,370 1,213,530 1,206,690 1,199,850 1,190,920 Total Annual Payments $ 1.370.370 $ 1,363,530 $ 1,356,690 $ 1,349,850 $ 1,39D,920 2000 Refunding(Series A) Principal Payments $ 400,D00 S 400,000 $ 400,000 If 5,800,OOD $ 5,300,OOD Interest Payments 3,375,787 3,361,067 3,346,347 3,149,467 2,952,893 Total Annual Payments $ 3.775.787 $ 3,761,067 $ 3,746,347 $ 8,949,467 S 8,252,893 2000 Refunding(Series B) Principal Payments $ 400,DOO S 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 6,500,OOD $ 6,000.000 Interest Payments 3,832,107 3,814,013 3,795,613 3,674,813 3,352,480 Total Annual Payments $ 4,232.107 $ 4,314,013 $ 4,295,613 $ 10.074,813 $ 9,352,480 2003 COP-Acqulsltlon I Construction Principal Payments $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Interest Payments 9,575,000 9,575,000 9,575,000 9.575,000 9,575,ODD A-7 4I3 OM ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT RATE STUDY ANALYSIS Debt Service Total Annual Payments S 9,575,000 $ 9,575.000 $ 9,575.000 S 9.575,000 $ 9.575,000 (Mike's Cash Flow budget lists two different payment schedules for the 2003 COP,this Is from Mandatory Principal Fort schedule) 2006 Certificates of Participation Principal Payments $ - $ - $ $ - $ Interest Payments 7,569,100 7,569.100 7,569,100 7,569,100 7.569.100 Total Annual Payments $ 7.569,100 $ 7,569.100 $ 7,569,100 S 7.569,100 $ 7,569.100 (Mike's Cash Flow budget lists Ism different payment schedules for the 2006 COP,this is from Mandatory Principal Pint schedule) 2007 Certificates of Participation(Series A) Principal Payments $ 190.000 $ 200,000 $ 205,000 $ 215,DOD $ 225,000 Interest Payments 4,175,911 4,168,144 4.160.061 4,151,694 4,142,927 Total Annual Payments $ 4.365,911 S 4,368.144 $ 4,365,061 S 4,366,694 $ 4.367.927 (13 01 BNoaules u0e1ea on 11I301mm Mike Whllab EMa) 2007Certificates of Participation(Series B) Principal Payments $ 4.815,000 S S 055,0D0 $ $1305.000 $ 5,575,000 $ 5,850,000 Interest Paymens $ 14,580,337.50 $ 14,391,737.50 S 14,185,370.83 $ 13,968,670.83 $ 13,741,087.50 Total Annual Payments $ 19A03,338 $ 19,446,738 $ 19,490,371 $ 19.543,671 $ 19,591.088 ""as FY 2009 FY 2010 12011 FY 2012 Total Senior COP Debt 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Principal Payments $ 20,065,000 $ 21,365,000 $ 2&575.000 S 23.385,000 S 24.545.000 Interest Payments 47.911,136 46.835.679 45.696.B50 44.711.445 43.668.864 Total Annual Payments $ 67,976.136 $ 68,20 ,679 $ 61 $ 68,096,445 $ 68.213,864 Junior Debt Principal Payments Interest Payments Total Annual Payments $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Junior Debt Principal Payments Interest Payments Total Annual Payments $ - S - S - $ - $ - Junior Debt Principal Payments Interest Payments Total Annual Payments $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - FY:oOe FY 2009 FY 2010 FY2011 FY 2012 Total Junior Debt 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Principal Payments S - S - S S - $ - Interest Payments - Total Annual Payments S S S $ - $ - A-8 41M008 i ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT -- RATE STUDY ANALYSIS Debt Service FUTURE DEBT SERVICE fY Asia ly ase 1.10 rr Xti %eat2 Certificates of Participation 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Pnncipal Payments $ 1,929,970 S 5.261,W5 $ 7.661.415 $ %594,031 5 11,517,917 Interest Payments 6.411,250 17.062.251 23.8%,663 28,661,092 32,978,890 Total Annual Payments $ 8.341,220 $ 2$324,026 S 31,558.077 S W.255.123 $ 44,496.808 Added Reserve Requirement $0 $0 so s0 $0 Altemal0 Loans[Tmdltional structure] Principal Payments $ - $ - S - $ - S Interest Payments Total Annual Payments S - $ - $ - $ - S - AddedReserveRepuiremenf SO $o so SO s0 Mandate Loans[Level Principal Payments] Principal Payments S - $ - $ - $ - S - Interest Payments Total Annual Payments $ - S - $ - S - S - Added Reserve Regwmment So $o $0 s0 SO Debt Assumptions sv z00e "M fY"do ry Alta %Aa12 Certificates of Participation 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Debt Proceeds S 256.000.000 S 173.000.000 S 110.000.000 5 95.000,000 S 96.000.000 Term d Bond 30 years 30 years 30 years W years 30 years Interest Rate 5.00% 5.00% 5.W% 5.00% 500% Issuance Costs 5450.000 5450,000 S450.000 S450.000 s450.000 Reserve Requirement 0.00% O.W% O.W% 0.00% 000% Alternate Loans[Traditional Structure] Debt Proceeds $ - S - $ - 5 - 5 - Debt Payments S - S - S - S S - Term of Bond 20 years 20 years 20 years 20 years 20 years Interest Rate 2.50% 2.50% 2,50% 2,50% 2.50% Issuance Costs O.W% 0,00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Reserve Requirement O.W% 0.00% 0.00% O.W% 0.00% Alternate Loans[Laval Principal Payments] Debt Proceeds S - S - S - S - S - Term of Bond 20 years 20 years 20 years 200. 20 years Interest Rate 2.50% 2.50% 2.501/6 2.50% 2.50% Issuance Costs 0.00% 000% O.W% O.W% O.W% Reserve Requirement 0.00% O.W% O.W% O.W% 000% A 9 4/312008 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MTE STUDY ANPLYSIS P enJOdME.paMlluna { aiq]oe 1 f S O frluA'ol fo32N Ofux rIHSWPAI � H,NW 06N rl%rl •' PoMNhrm S Idnrrlq.wigxxrr wriwuwa Rx+uuxl fe. fp, v. ]x v IM+I IOWI 10^ml I wnuan . PmRfrx.rraW rwaml OpxmgMnir HWWi S ]w.1mm S ilUP.515 i ]Silmsr 1 mlL,ma { 91.1M1m r9�L�PWr.']tlTWP wa..rww 7 mi ) vu 1 ImIH.r Hw.b HWan S.HR.w e.Waf i 451LM afu.f5a e]Iiw XwN L�PaEMTAxOY,WrEwu ^_.w^+�i 5. a S Y { pwx�.�mymynr5xv Bw BWneb fr'v n.M^ mwir.� � - qM� Nwl xeWurmgPrir eWW 1 uwo,eu 1 H{.f{{.010 { !!Nlwp { rimyf 1 ]iw,fm ApHm uewwx[puHryPnxvBu �u�{ S - S � { � 5 ge�iL n .wow+ _ niwnm PsrHmew 1 � i i � 1 � S v�RWCE PE xYY li Emx� i IOuxl wxuxuw �] . eNluvmnxmnu Wxr i LnS.mo S ]pfu0o S ieY,mO 1 ieu,wo 1 ].iSAr MNnunfxel ILaneul { H S e { y { OWArrenW ORN01 y.ICWUM S S MYS uM!M OwPHq PiiWainE SW tlormryPpw.eAWPA6HBYY , mvo EPw Pmur Fwl IUM lugl ew.v�m, Ooarnnxuev[mw i ai]upa5 i mMEv S a,Em)m i wpmAn { n,uuu ae,mSAv i w,fMNS S nSm.Eu i wa,mua { m.ur.ur SLmmi(1Yma i wS forum uwwi mom. f.o]r.W] tY.A. !fss,mf aH➢.w arm.rer ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT RATEe ymame Paniw..WOY 6/Yq'WM �a �aw xw,w v�nwAm Y�m 'mu+ra _ �aa un.m 411AIt �a b�v n.m � wm 1gPN +lggl Pn + ttAet ''eve�e a.0 w :a ,Y......bwY. � t qma 1 aaeun i qwa 1 lance t nAaa+ [w�Amgq �i`� . 1 mw.m 1 o f W I gHI�ma 1 nmwm ��once l unea over smm aYa _ _ wno taPbl mum lma wm ma +Nm +si+q �nn0 ',yµpPA{.ye_._ Imy YY mW+ taAn +Rw ewmmY+ Wltl .ptq N,Y+ ne]q n m aw nw w.no wtn on.w nqa n�aa _ aw wm mw aw nna nm vam w�raw. — lame wm m+m vum iYIMFMMMtl i n.NY t nwaq 1 Wm.+q t mlpy 1 myP Wsyp • i ]Y{m.m 1 1n.aW 1 wHI.�e t InWa i u0.m �afa In]IO •m. .a.. _ v>.w w+a vino _ ___ 'um u�Pu n.m maq alxl w Ua Ml] .w Aw awbma lam+ � m'Wl oval' +wa +qY1 ad iYNnMvwtme • 1 +ARm 1 lY.+m t +}m}q t I.RW i +.qM w..r�r �1 .am.a 1 �mq 1 Wn.m t v4+aL i w.nnn prtyuus tam m1q� +aw �mlm haw a w nm aml qa 0. r rYPgpiPWM t Wq t melm 1 lmiw t maw t Y.w +...v.+Y • 1 aan.m t nwa. 1 am.n t aw]r t Y...m.rY, uam me�me.+.am.m. aauw 1®m m,m rr Y.eew.P+ • 1 laYlt 1 uq.n+ 1 +aro 1 +.ma 1 +.man mua�m Mww+r� — • t calm 1 ]+nILL�. 1 wal.+b t wa+. i Kant �e...m- mm ranar +.ww x�mAo ]am UYill ea+la nmMm P.lna eaP�b ala axal qly ¢pier mfm a.mf qa '�aY )m'rn 1. uy.unnwmw.�n W w,w aam sa qa .ba+. �mm nrw yam imale Y.ma Suva +raAtl .m}11 n610.L' aea v..s.ry�4nua� _ nna PnMb flam ]yna ap10 ]la wan mPn ».a mHI wa tlml q,ua b1AM aAq +ma mlan man man vul. w»� w.+a waa voAa tr.eY+mtl � m�ao ma voaeb tmm+ wm ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MTE SwDY ANAIYEIS � mnv,v.�evaxe.a.aepa. nw +»ii e.r.rr..Yru. taro MetwY MtntY twY Ya.rtw ]uAa waae m,tw eTMrm taatw �a[vAeeaY a1.lY a1,IL wpa alm] .Y�c tiM alw ap] xw aAm ffiMa. t w atYne aYml aww twlx _ ..rowYY �i� n.wpa naaull n.wax nmlma uwam +rew4P1A� l n,tv,w ] W141e1 1 nmw 1 xAutw 1 n.Mpt I P.ar�bpatY�ewiYAewMAxelyn MwY lawYlYtll ___ nwYm ] nen+un 1 a.ww.n 1 aiuvue 1 aanmAl PYa�rYYpt _ Yp+ Y�p� ea]M w.Y IniA _ StY,Y aw.Y a461A Sw.111 1pfw oe�br Cp. ua� SaY lwlp ]nw �nl t]Stl �Y�Y IYAte Itlw oeww+a. 'e�.+NeY� Y,Y .Qia .aW .Yw N�..rw m,Y w w enw eAml �Iw .�._ lnw mm aun e.raw � mw .w.m M!n _— le�. 1, lwm anon Smw ],ma +YOreMlexwr •1 aWlx 1 a/xml 1 aalw i iWe+e 1 smMn NY �,. M,n;m 1 M,Y,m 1 ramm 1 mwn 1 mAan xuerrwy MSw Y.rA Alw mw ]II91 mle.see..! Alm] m,v+ a5Y w.+a Y.n lspl ]opt s,eu n+iR ut..natw awY IwAte ttiY IwAr tare ava...A t.�raln _ _ ntw lwAw aam llanr �eMrnv..n. _— nw aw a.en AA+ u..s.t.r nw aw aw >w MAY Mae tales l4wmmews � •1 SrYin 1 anUY 1 .tYw 1 4xMe 1 4niwl 1 a4fnw 1 nPaaw a Mww 1 SaWp l NtmY .a..�.•...ry Y w ew lil] uA t]m t]s Yut�em�a �Y YlYYeY �-.• ]xa0 aRlw ]w.la !RY xtiw etwte Yr,Y INAa fYpY rY.tn +a.nrmiway •1 tpSeY 1 tAwlY ] 4+Am ] tp4Y a tAOM _ 1 mlanwl 1 emenw a esmra 1 umm� 1 4mawen Ywl�Mmb � __ _ ..tlew ;mAa AeIY,M IM,Y 10A1 tmxgtNelY'ruav •e 14A4o1 l tUAM 1 nnSJo 1 ntaw i t1.o1p1 _ ____ MwA A S!5®Y i IrAM.�O i fwwan 1 aMtm erw Ys ____ tp1p� +iwifi ellffif u.e.tFnYY _ fA.d lapl 111w rraq.rtn�otu _ _ arYeL .miN 4Y�w 4Yi1] rtueq.Nnf Otu _ __ Sply plAll ;n4A SYAn YY,Y 2. maaY I�Y���W W1a YIpS Wae enw a4e�e 1 M1. Sm.m Mmi Dept Y.tY mAn Mw rAw SY,fp raa.orynr miA _ __ lniN tow toY __ _ _ Mip Mpt lYae L� _ • atm) 0.Y Pln 0.tw rwewvvNlYPee u rxOY raiM a-�I uYOi ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r MTE STUDY MOMYSIS TD MOMYSIS ey.awA, s mi> o...wu.. '•'\ nnea. \ nauo \ nfYgY \ .a.n,\te t PaxiW .\ rafa \ n t ana t anl,ar \ affi\I am euW xm .,sett��.d..e amafa sfsmµi sYuo uwre �.w gePl 1Psu wan +wm r..m....w — fYm wm nem Paxm faeP - em em vP sm wr iw PtigeYp6Tw •\ xnl}n \ wlae t ;fnlee t >Pfm t f.Y.nl fMp naWP PaffiP t IYPe.fO i µfP.er \ YL®P Plat \ Yr.am e.tlPr tnttl iYdmlusep t I.Ipat t UY.tn t VPMI \ faMn i flµlP 18n1m$we i tffiN \ lwP i 1.Ro i fy,q w uw�^+fie ryPW fµflt IX.W 1P\II 1Lfq rw•n[v\w� tl} Y)Y Ym Nm Mfn o..a...mf ..! emm a.rnm twao tmm xwxfe is M1slWfp•Yy •\ LIPm \ tLFM \ LW4w i x1WW t wNP f wYWltsu'wu•s tI41PIN \ N4M.P t tl t WIPn i N.YLW MwlaoW by U.ml U.tW ffiUafl M1fnl Wnl wueo• rygemweq clew. 0.1ef.P11 PSµMII M1Yl1W U41n.LV1 If0m3eol PMuq•YPY�f 14rPRb �fmYl In.Y).OPI Ifr.lfexPl NmMI m�oa.L.aoY.. iW uMwn \ I""mUm\ PI.Maq\ P41Mff1 i PMf4n-0 i wlgtlfl Ptl�ea ���� �d\rw nNe xLA,tl I,tPelf la/.n3 fmxrf �. __ • Qm,m aunt antml unm •elbf ♦rrpuwe \ LM.N \ epLP\ \ 611xiP i anlfn i YPa\ rrwewe•mvmpYYnmT�uuOW wPl \ .e etlem anule To1NpoA.YTNp�' 1 41Pm t \ \ w}n \ lA1Hf\ ygamp \ tIµ®n i SAraWY \ LMmP i U�adtl iu Blfvae i i1µmID t aeµmn t ]AItmID \ SxµmW i UKWfE MYnBrmee y®.e..w t fmlaw t reunm t rP re \ mmm \ fWmar n.d.e.w Yo.s..re,+W .fnae ffien vweae v��w uqm mm unm aufm it q.+gnwn.. a malaY \ 1nIP9n \ I.. \ 1Prw t Ismaf x.n Irm ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT RATE STUDY ANALYSIS REYENV£P£YWIFIIFN]6 CYM ftPW BYiFltlOILY RPBF us Oup 4 In]M.W { e1410 4 WAgM 4 an.IIe® 4 IDlgWya mvcpespwwa 18WI]A SI.1gM xnMaM re+ra RWW q, ll, nITIDI ]l Ypugrawyxsny fy].W I,U401 f3gW _ iy W.wra 4 my]An 4 ]M]Rfn 4 glYlye i n1JAn� i ]R]fi3�e YluiYn Hi M] WI wf Wi OP'94ma]9Umnr Mne'elwa { �AA�W1 4 1WW i Wn1.W { wARH i �AsmY� m]��Ewun IXN]wb Rf�1An q.W.M 4An IAYI,W nifGA NYwuCalul upamrei]uoA Iq.IX _ 4m43�6 wmumingnu�mu Omvx pgWure { W,0113b 4 WYFR] i n1Af4H i n]AAtl� f ]n3yW iW 6uwyuu i W,q�]D 4 agMi2] S a]]Af4W i nI.nANf i agARW Mvp4pnmuaeupu NASna]t { AfRyf • ifyMn i Af1f.W i m,]Aim i IiWJY rOXr CPYEmArFlE41 �Muiu i In186,q] 4 ID181W0 i SNAR]li i ]i161i i n]]\MW fMWgRmua 16��8]M ]14nWf R]M.W IISgni nW40 xnquespreXuresewa MWAtt f� RW�m wex+a µA]Wf �MM �AgpY IA¢]ff aAu.gi ]Aup] ]Af1M 2818W icMa~Mwu]lARsmr _ _ iYRrmw { r41YIM i W.WAm { n1Afa.ID { n1ARq] i AAR41n egneYna rq nY ID1f IDR HI �grewEw� i ]tN)S1 314m] i ]4Wyi i �IDA]Am { ffi W]]I fmv0geared Y4W,tn i 11f.rLY4 IWRH ffin].M ansJn YnM WpMuumf ]tl lgtlus i LeJn,Yl i MS{4q] i ID�yf.ue { ffi�IIAn { ]li3q]N wmA+«re.rml4mrem]f . W]Aw{ r.+ww i r.n4w]i niamar 4 Rwlw REVENUEAEQUIPEWNTAM]E IMYMTr Wf ieu�umufuqu Mhwpl i PRfgli IDr,fy�eli PIAHIt PO.MFI4 6M.Iw uy �Heam IOIDf �AO]F �ORF 414t YYlll x<I14MlIfnMn YrOeIN' mw m a ORANGE COUNTY SANRATION DISTRICT w.ne,w Jwarle a am rr.wa., TM Im mon min vuxraaremrvxR m w.�a..lm f mlum .{a Fis.aom. 4 A.O.00 100a P4 u w.min f �J eao e.m.no..cmo�uul _ e amx.+vrwn enx waov wa n n _ R fox ]na. R M ax oa n R w so.w rma ... ...�..�« f r]r,a71 i Onr9f { R�rr.13♦ { Ka.la ]4.MK uYVu M1YA ]xra. f a.�.a f aartm ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT sere sTuDY, Vsls Nmnwul RMoeetlan 6/Iero CN[uNlbn »M uxW 4..IM W.up Fcwr 4 I.en1491 a aM .N q1 qy u,.s�,ew� fA1�W M.bM[.,.b W1W ]A a.fi m.�ewne.W nl nmaf» w an mq.rom.Xr...a uPa{ aefi bufa.,Ylb.+uXFM Wnn n.WIM M r.fi ,M n....X.ra..n.wWWue.,.wn nnn.A»I W+,MMV N'.anu.f IflWAml XmMi.fie n...rv.. In.W Mll utl Ma,.X S IM»0.r» 4 PrnW 1 n„ n IMW.nI, 1M.Mtnn 4 4 nplpe 4 n}n.n[ MmCRLNIgTpX aw W mXu� 4 azou» { nnfm 4 euaW wxw TW aon. Wvae. Ge.ns Mw.alw I >4M.W Yl.@W 1Pp»AW 4/aWOpM1 {IIb B.n {IIYIL „reu »eW ».»r tome WWry •00.1ry.1 TA.61yq Fgivm,muMiry Y.l iln mf aY nn0.0Ylln. na.'Ill. �ueN.w X 4-la yy(d Appendix B USER CATEGORIES ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ` ,RATE STUDY ANALYSIS USER RATE CATAGOR/ES �'zroAlloo9 EDU Annual Rate $201.25 Percentage of SFR Use Codes Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit User Rates 1 VACANT LAND 0% SO.UO 5 COMMON AREA PARCEL 0% SO.00 6 'HOLD'PARCEL 0% $0.00 8 EOUIV TO VACANT 0% $0.00 121 PARCEL OF MINIMAL OR NO VALUE 0% $0.00 122 SUBSURFACE PARCELS 0% $0.00 124 OILIMINERAL RIGHTS 0% 50.00 125 MINERAL RIGHTS EQUIPMENT 0% SO.00 126 VACANT COMMON AREA-IMP ALLOC O% $0.00 201 HOME OWNERS EXEMPTION ADO'N 0% $0.00 666 UNASSIGNED VACANT 0% $0.00 222 OFFICE CONDOS W/OUT INDIVIDUAL BTHRMS O% SO.00 444 LA MIRADA TRACT(INCLUDES LOCAL FEE) 0% $0.00 777 SEPTIC TANK PROPERTY 0% SO.00 112 STEEL BUILDING 7% $14.09 113 MINI-WAREHOUSE 7% S14.09 58 NURSERIES(PLANTS) 10% $20.13 100 DRIVE-IN THEATER 10% $20.13 44 LUMBER/CONSTR MATL YARD 17% $34.21 71 PARKING GARAGE 17% $34.21 72 PAVED PARKING LOT 17% $34.21 110 WAREHOUSE-SINGLE TENANT 17% 534.21 111 WAREHOUSE-MULTI TENANT 17% 534.21 115 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE STORAGE 17% 534.21 116 TRUCK TERMINAL 17% $34.21 33 CHURCH BUILDINGS 20% 540.25 94 DEPARTMENT STORE 23% 546.29 95 DISCOUNT STORE 23% $46.29 96 UNATTACHED SINGLE STORE 23% 546.29 97 STRIP STORE 23% 546.29 36 FINANCIAL BUILDINGS 27% $54.34 74 RECREATION VEHICLE PARK 27% $54.34 40 HEALTH CLUB 29% 558.36 68 HIGH RISE OFFICE 30% 560.38 21 AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP 41% $82.51 22 AUTO REPAIR SHOP 41% 582.51 23 AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 41% 582.51 24 USED CAR LOT 41% $82.51 39 GOLF COURSE 41% $82.51 57 MOTORCYCLE/SMALL VEHICLE BLDG 41% 582.51 65 SINGLE OFFICE SLOGS TO 3 STORIES 41% 582.51 66 SMALL OFFICE CENTER 41% 582.51 67 OFFICE COMPLEX 41% 582.51 69 CONVERTED RESIDENCE TO OFFICE 41% 582.51 83 AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE STATION 41% $82.51 84 MARINE SERVICE STATION 41% 582.51 86 COMBIN:SERVICE STN/CONVIENCE MKT 41% 582.51 B-1 4/3/2008 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT IRATE STUDY ANALYSIS USER RATE CATAGORIES n zooelzaas � EDU Annual Rate $201.25 Percentage of SFR Use Codes Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit User Rates 7 MOBILEHOME 50% S700.63 55 MOBILE HOME PARK 50% S100.63 107 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL-SINGLE TENANT 50% $100.63 108 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL-MULTI TENANT 50% $100.63 109 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 50% S100.63 114 INDUSTRIAL PARK 50% S100.63 37 FRATERNAL BUILDINGS 51% S102.64 101 UNATTACHED THEATER 51% S102.64 26 AIRPORT AND RELATED 53% $106.66 45 MARINAS 53% $106.66 88 CONVENIENCE SHOPPING CENTER 53% S106.66 3 TWO OR MORE SFR 70% $140.88 10 DUPLEX ONLY 70% S140.88 11 TRIPLEX ONLY 70% $140.88 12 04-UNITS ONLY 70% S140.88 13 5TO 16 UNITS 70% $140.88 14 17 TO 25 UNITS 70% $140.88 15 26-00 UNITS ONLY 70% $140.88 16 41-99 UNITS ONLY 70% $140.88 17 100 OR MORE UNITS 70% $140.88 18 A MIX OF FORMS 70% S140.88 56 MOTELS AND MOTOR HOTELS 70% $140B8 63 LOW RISE RETIREMENT BUILDING 70% $140.88 64 HIGH RISE RETIREMENT BUILDING 70% S140.88 81 PRESCHOOLS.NURSERY OR CARE 82% S165.03 82 PRIVATE SCHOOLS 82% S165.03 98 STORE WITH OFFICES OR LIV OTR 82% S165.03 99 STORE WI OFFICE UPSTAIRS 82% $165.03 118 GOVERNMENTAL USE 82% $165.03 19 SFR WITH 1 OR 2 RENTALS 85% $171.06 34 DORMITORY 97% $195.21 42 HOSPITAL 97% $195.21 43 HOTEL 97% $195.21 000 CONVERSION-RURAL 100% $201.25 2 ONE RESIDENCE 100% $201.25 4 MISC IMPROVEMENT 100% $201.25 85 COMBIN:SERV STWRESTAURANT 100% $201.25 103 CHEMICAL TANK AND BULK STORAGE 100% S201.25 104 FOOD PROCESSING PLANT 100% S201.25 105 COLD STORAGE PLANT 100% $201.25 106 FACTORY 100% S201.25 B-2 4rWOOS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT RATE STUDY ANALYSIS USER RATE CATAGORIES 7-1 EDU Annual Rate $201.25 Percentage of SFR Use Codes Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit User Rates 119 PUBLIC UTILITY 100% $201.25 120 WATER MUTUAL OR COMPANY 100% $201.25 888 CONVERSION-COMPOSITE PROP 100% $201.25 32 CEMETERY&RELATED 101% $203.26 38 FUNERAL HOME 101% $203.26 60 NURSING HOME 102% $205.28 61 CONVALESCENT HOSPITALS 102% $205.28 62 CONVERTED RES USED AS NURSING 102% $205.28 28 BOWLING ALLEYS 112% $225.40 92 SKATING RINKS 112% $225.40 50 SINGLE MEDICAL SLOGS TO 3 STORIES 124% $249.55 51 SMALL MEDICAL CENTER 124% $249.55 52 MEDICAL CENTER COMPLEX 124% $249.55 53 HIGH RISE MEDICAL 124% $249.55 54 CONVERTED RESIDENCE TO MEDICAL 124% $249.55 89 NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER 139% $279.74 20 AMUSEMENT PARKS 144% $289.80 35 ENTERTAINMENT CENTER 144% $289.80 73 RECREATION 144% $289.80 30 COIN OPERATED CAR WASH 151% $303.89 47 SUPERMARKET 151% $303.89 48 CONVENIENCE MARKET 151% $303.89 224 NIGHTCLUB 200% S4D2.50 90 COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER 226% S454.83 76 RESTAURANT-TAKEOUT 300% $603.75 77 RESTAURANT-COFFEE SHOP 600% $1.207.50 78 RESTAURANT-DINNER HOUSE 600% $1.207.50 79 RESTAURANT-CONVERSION FROM SFR 600% $1.207.50 29 CONVENTIONAL CAR WASH 796% $1,601.95 223 LAUNDROMAT 1800% $3,622.50 B-3 4/3/2008 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Administration Committee Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on April 9, 2008, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on April 3, 2008. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of April 2008. Lilia K Committee Secretary Orange County Sanitation District HADEPT4 GENDAVDMIN COMMITTEEUGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT vfal str ran NOTICE OF MEETING fa.: "'°I''A"" ' ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE •w...en.e.®In Finance, Human Resources and Information Technology m.m,q•em..•: IFMH.:IIII V.II 8 GA � d'2Jee 127 a4+nt am. : 11f°9tl1i°A"""° ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Fwrnmn Mull", U P?70H Alta wl.wr WEDNESDAY, APRIL 9, 2008 - 5:00 P.M. r A ina® e¢I•. DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES ..� al"Hallo 10844 ELLIS AVENUE HI„a FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 Hmxfl Pan W W W.00SD.COM 44". ,.xnaam Ali , � PoIINY/w I;eN.m tdrne HixilinpGAl 9nxl;n H.'ahn' A regular meeting of the Administration Committee of the Orange le lva la Irdllm County Sanitation District will be held at the above location, date L,e as N v Ha.:' and time. rlu9,aia:h n„nlJa armme FnNd Ana Sxal ilaecn Ramnn ID ail Win fbM Porfx, I rma taunt, of 0,.... 5nn1e.ry nlnvlece Penny Kyle (2 copies no label Clerk of the Board 01.11 Ma," Mnilnry flry W.W 01ncd•c. b•vina Hanlih To maintain mddC lass leadership in wastewater and water resource manegamam. a SV SLH 14' L� Q * O e al C7 p e• p Hi C hs INF EHHVHH L ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Lr Meeting Date Board Meeting Dates April 9, 2008 April 23, 2008 May 14, 2008 May 28, 2008 L June 11, 2008 June 25, 2008 July 9, 2008 July 23, 2008 L August - 2008 Dark August 27, 2008 September 10, 2008 *September 17, 2008 L October 8, 2008 October 22, 2008 — November 12, 2008 *November 19, 2008 L December 10, 2008 *December 17, 2008 January - 2009 Dark January 21, 2009 L February 11, 2009 February 25, 2008 I March 11, 2009 March 25, 2009 W L *Meetings being held the third Wednesday of the month. L L L L 6 r ROLL CALL ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Finance, Human Resources and Information Technology Meeting Date: April 9. 2008 Time: 5:00 p.m. Adjoum: COMMITTEE MEMBERS (14) r Mark Waldman Chair Phil Luebben ice Chair Bill DaRon Jon Dumttru Rich Freschi Don Hansen Darryl Miller Joy Neugebauer Chris Norb Christina Shea Sal Tinajero Jim Winder James M. Ferryman Board Chair Doug Davert Board Vice Chair OTHERS Brad H in, General Counsel r STAFF Jim Ruth, General Manager Bob Ghirelli,Assistant General Manager Nick Arhontes, Dir. of Operations& Maintenance Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering Ed Torres, Director of Technical Services Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Lilia Kovac, Committee Secretary Jeff Reed, Human Resources and Employee Relations Mana er Mike White, Controller H:WeptlagendaVWmin Commilleet2 W0408102. Roll Call.doc r AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE -- ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT WEDNESDAY, APRIL 9, 2008, AT 5:00 P.M. r ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 www.ocsd.com (1) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE r (2) DECLARATION OF QUORUM .d (3) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM IF NECESSARY (4) PUBLIC COMMENTS 'r (5) REPORT OF COMMITTEE CHAIR (6) REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER r� (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES (8) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL (9) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. Approve minutes of the March 12, 2008, meeting of the Administration Committee. V FMID OE CONSENT CALENDAR r r Book Page I April 9, 2008 Page 2 I b. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. (10) ACTION ITEMS jIW a. ADM08-08 Recommend to the Board of Directors to: 1)Approve a sole source 1 purchase order to ShoreTel Inc. for the purchase of hardware and software to replace OCSD's telephone system, for a total amount of$375,460; and, 2)Approve a 5% contingency($18,775). (Book Page 9) b. ADM08-09 Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt revised methodology for calculating high strength discharger permit rates based upon net revenue requirements that includes a reduction for property taxes paid by customers. (Book Page 11) (11) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. ADMOS-10 Status on the renewal quotes of the District's Major Insurance Programs for FY 2008-09 (Book Page 17) I b. ADM08-11 FY 2008-09 Benefits Program Renewal Costs (Book Page 20) c. ADM08-12 FY 2008-09 and 2009-10 District Proposed Budget Update (Book Page 22) � (12) CLOSED SESSION --..._.._......------'--'--------'------------'-----------------'--..—.—'-------..-._.. I During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Committee, ) the Chair may convene the Committee in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, I r pending or potential litigation,or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, Ir i 54957 or 54957.6,as noted. Reports relatin g g to (a) purchase and sale of real preperty; (b) matters of pending or potential INgation; (c) employee actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Committee during a permitted dosed session i and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Committee on any of these.subjects,iha minutes will reflect all re9ML disclosures of iMomiation__—_ ly! a. Convene in closed session. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Government Code Section 54957(b)(1)) ' I 1. Agency Designated Representatives: James D. Ruth, General Manager; Robert Ghirelli, I.+ Assistant General Manager; Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Administrative Services; Jeff Reed, Human Resources and Employee Relations Manager; and Paul I ; Loehr, Human Resources Supervisor. IL, u u Book Page 2 . April 9, 2008 Page 3 f 2. Employee Organizations: 1). Orange County Employees Association; 2). International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 501, and 3). Supervisors, Professional Management Team (part of Peace Officers Council of California). w b. Reconvene in regular session. r C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. w (13) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT rl (15) ADJOURNMENT: The next regular Administration Committee meeting is scheduled for er May 7, 2008, at 5 p.m. r r r col I w w L w Book Page 3 W April 9, 2008 Page 4 I Agenda Posting: In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office I of the Clerk of the Board. Items Not Posted: In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Committee for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item or because there is a need to take immediate action, which need came to the attention of the Committee subsequent to the posting of agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted in the manner as above, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. Public Comments: Any member of the public may address the Administration Committee on specific agenda items or matters of general interest. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be defamed until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Committee except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). Consent Calendar: Al matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation, and unless a particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director of staff member,there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. _. 1 The Committee Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Items Continued: Items may be continued from this meeting without further notice to a Committee meeting held I� within five(5)days of this meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(3). Meeting Adioumment: This meeting may be adjourned to a later time and items of business from this agenda may be I_ considered at the later meeting by Order of Adjournment and Notice in accordance with Government Code Section II 54955(posted within 24 hours). LI Accommodations for the Disabled: The Board of Directors Meeting Room is wheelchair accessible. If you require any special disability related accommodations, please contact the Orange County Sanitation District Clerk of the Board's office at (714)593-7130 at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Requests must specify the nature of the disability and the type of accommodation requested. Notice to Committee Members: For any questions on the agenda or to place any items on the agenda, Committee members should contact the Committee Chair or Clerk of the Board ten days in advance of the Committee meeting. i Committee Chair: Mark Waldman (714)827-1959 Committee Secretary: Lille Kovac (714)593-7124 Ikovac9tocsd.com General Manager: Jim Ruth (714)593.7110 iMhdocsd.com Assistant General Manager Bob Ghirelli (714)593-7400 mhimIIiRocsd.mm L Director of Finance and Lorem:o Tyner (714)583.75M Iwnwaocsd.mm Administrative Services Human Resoumes and Employee Jeff Reed (714)593.7144 ireedroilocsd.mm j Relations Manager 1 L H:\deptlagentla\Admin Committee\2008\0408\03.040908.Admin Agenda.dac G L Book Page 4 r April 9, 2008 ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE AGENDA CALENDAR Item Action May FY 2008-09 and FY 2009-10 Budget Update Information May Staffing Requests Action June Proposed FY 2008-09 and FY 2009-10 Budget Action r June Wastewater Rates for SAWPA Discharge Action Property, Liability, and Workers' Compensation June Insurance Renewal Action r r r r r r r r r Book Page 5 �. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, March 12, 2008, at 5:00 P.M. A meeting of the Administration Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on March 12, 2008, at 5:00 p.m., in the Sanitation District's Administrative Office. ,r (2) Following the Pledge of Allegiance, a quorum was declared present, as follows: ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE STAFF PRESENT: MEMBERS: Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and DIRECTORS PRESENT: Administrative Services Mark Waldman, Chair Mike White, Controller Phil Luebben, Vice Chair Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Bill Dalton Bob Bell Rich Freschi Bob Geggie Don Hansen Rich Spencer Joy Neugebauer Randy Kleinman Chris Norby Rich Spencer Christina Shea Sal Tinajero OTHERS PRESENT: Jim Winder Brad Hogin, General Counsel Jim Ferryman, Board Chair Jim Holobaugh,Aon Insurance Tom Harvey,Aon Insurance DIRECTORS ABSENT: Jon Dumlfru Darryl Miller Doug Davert, Board Vice Chair d (3) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (4) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (6) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Waldman did not give a report. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER a General Manager, Jim Ruth, was not present and no report was given on his behalf. Book Page 6 Minutes of the Administration Committee February 13, 2008 Page 2 (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES �•I Ir Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Administrative Services, did not give a report. (8) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL Brad Hogin, General Counsel, did not give a report. j (9) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS y Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve minutes of the February 13, it 2008 meeting of the Administration Committee. L END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ACTION ITEMS L+ a. ADMO8-06 Randy Kleinman, Principal Financial Analyst, provided an overview of the District's history of workers'compensafion and general liability insurance program, and analysis of cost savings for managing in-house. It was determined that Liberty Mutual be the insurance carrier for the general liability and workers' compensation insurance program. Directors _ requested that staff provide annual review of all OCIP costs. u MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve a contract with Liberty Mutual as the insurance carrier to insure the District's Owner Controlled Insurance Program for General Liability and Workers' Compensation, for a five-year program, at a cost not to exceed $18,000,000, in a form approved by General Counsel. `V (11) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS w a. ADMOB-07 Information Technology Strategic Plan. Rich Castillon, I.T. Manager, provided an overview of the Information Technology Strategic Plan. (12) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. . L. (13) OTHER BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY 4 I ' u Book Page 7 r Minutes of the Administration Committee February 13, 2008 Page 3 r There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ` ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (15) ADJOURNMENT r The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:11 p.m. The next regular Administration Committee meeting is scheduled for April 9, 2008, at 5 p.m. r Submitted by: Penny Ky1eU Committee SecrEftary 4 r r r r v r r r Book Page 8 ti ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE M0UOBM Toetl.of Dr. WoD Wz9/at „er AGENDA REPORT rADMmmmer IRm Number' Orange County Sanitation District .I FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Administrative Services r SUBJECT: REPLACEMENT OF TELEPHONE SYSTEM .r GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION ,r 1. Approve a sole source purchase order to ShoreTel Inc., for the purchase of hardware and software to replace OCSD's telephone system, for a total amount of $375,460; and, N 2. Approve a 5% contingency ($18,775). .J SUMMARY The Information Technology Division is responsible for providing reliable, cost- effective phone services for OCSD and its employees. Voice communications remain a critical part of day-today business both internally, and as an interface to the public. r The current Nortel telephone system is obsolete. The two telephone switches have been in service since 1990 and are in need of major software and hardware upgrades. The estimated cost for upgrades and feature enhancements is d $200,000. The increasing number of support incidents combined with limited features and ongoing third-party maintenance costs has forced us to consider different options for a telephone system. New technologies enable OCSD to form a single voice and data network and eliminate the need for a separate telephone system. A modern integrated system provides a wide range of features that improves business processes and gains efficiencies. Based on support cost reductions, this project will pay for itself in less than six years. • Staff recommends the replacement of the existing Nortel telephone system with a ShoreTel system. The selection of ShoreTel is based on a Request for Information (RFI), a pilot project, two years of industry research by staff, and site visits to other .r local government organizations. Staff has identified that the ShoreTel solution is the only reliable system that is simple enough to be implemented and maintained .r .w . n:WeMWgwdaWmin Page 1 r Book Page 9 J uI 1J with existing IT resources and run side-by-side with our current system while it is being phased out. ShoreTel is a Sunnyvale, CA based company that specializes in deployments to small-to-medium sized business markets and is known for their unique commitment to customer satisfaction. They are financially sound and base their models on price and value as well as ease of use for both the users and the IT support organizations. _ • Performing maintenance and support solely with OCSD staff will result in an estimated annual savings of$67,000. 111f • Dealing as a direct account with ShoreTel affords us a discount of 4% above the �+ GSA pricing. {Li PRIOR COMMITTEEIBOARD ACTIONS L • June 27, 2007; Fiscal Year 2007-08 Equipment Budget (Section 8, page 128) I ADDITIONAL INFORMATION L This replacement is identified in the Information Technology Strategic Plan. I� ShoreTel use by other state and local government agencies: Orange County Vector Control (site visit by OCSD) City of Loma Linda City of Oakland (site visit by OCSD) City of San Rafael City of Oceanside Amador Water District IL'i 11 u JDR:LT:RC:PB L L L nmnw�w�m Cmmi5wMa000BOB.VGPSvmlOoc Page Book Page 10 .+ ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MNeMRgDabe ToBO.clocr. 04/0e/0e o+/>3/ AGENDA REPORT Item Number tmn rvumbe nonce-ov r Orange County Sanitation District FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Administrative Services SUBJECT: PROPOSED RATES FOR HIGH STRENGTH DISCHARGERS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt revised methodology for calculating high strength discharger permit rates based upon net revenue requirements that includes a reduction for property taxes paid by customers. SUMMARY r Currently the Sanitation District's rate structure calculates Class I and Class II permittee rates (high strength dischargers) without taking into consideration property tax revenues received from the related parcels. Ordinance No. OCSD-31 then provides for a tax credit equal to the annual ad valorem tax basic levy allocated to the District for the property for which a permit has been issued by the District to be given to the permittee at year end. This tax credit is applied at the end of the year when the actual cost is determined based on actual flow, BOD, and SS discharges and reconciled against the estimated payments made during the year by the permittee. .r The District currently bills all sewer customers, other than high strength dischargers, under the net cost of service rate methodology in that the total costs of the District are .. reduced by all revenues, including property taxes and interest income, in developing the sewer service fee billing rates. The sewer rates of high strength dischargers, or permittees, were developed gross of property tax revenues and provide dollar for dollar �. credits for actual property taxes paid directly to the District. A recent independent sewer rate validation study completed by Bartle Wells Associates recommended that a uniform "net cost of service" rate methodolgy be developed and applied to all rate payers. The .� ultimate goal is to develop and implement a "net cost of service" rate structure for high industrial dischargers (permittees) that is fair and equitable to all rate payers without over taxing any one permittee in the first year of implementation. r The Administration Committee approved a contract Carollo Engineers for the completion of a sewer service fee rate study. This study was to include a "net cost of service" rate structure for high industrial dischargers (permittees) that will produce results that are fair and equitable to all rate payers Fmm N. M 1=3 Rw.MIM7 Page 1 r Book Page I I The calculation of the new proposed permittee rates for FY 2008-09 is now being proposed net of property tax revenues received. This methodology is consistent with the rest of the Sanitation District's current rate structure for all other customers. By u taking into consideration property taxes received by the District in deriving the new permittee rates for FY 2008-09, the need to provide a property tax credit will no longer exist. I�+ PRIOR COMMITTEEIBOARD ACTIONS �+ On November 23, 2007, the Administration Committee approved a contract with Carollo Engineers to complete a Sewer Rate Study. u On July 1, 1998, the Board adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-01, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Adopting Wastewater Regulations as a Reenactment of the Regulations Adopted and In Effect By Predecessor Districts. L, On May 23, 2007, the Board adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-31, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Establishing Wastewater I`II Discharge Regulations, and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-01. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Since the inception of the Permit User Fee program in 1970, users of the District's system that discharge high volumes or high strength wastewater have been required to obtain a discharge permit (either a Class I or Class II Permit) and to pay fees directly to the District for the cost of service. The fees are initially calculated on the basis of actual flow, BOD and SS discharged to the sewer and subsequently reduced by the actual property taxes they have paid to the District. This practice was intended to ensure that these users paid their actual cost of service through a combination of user fees and property taxes. Beginning in 1998-99, an additional step was added to reduce the parameter rates even more. The intent of this adjustment was to make the Permit User parameter rates equivalent to those implicit in the annual flat rate sanitary sewer service user fee. These individual rates are the de facto rates paid by all of the users who do not have Source Control permits. I From 1998-2004 these reduced de facto rates were presented to the Board for adoption as Permit User rates. There are approximately 500 Permit Users that pay for sewer services based upon their actual flow, BOD and SS discharge to the sewer. The I individual user rate (reduced de facto rate)that was adopted from 1998-99 through L 2004-05 for each of these parameters was calculated based upon net revenue I_ requirements for operations and maintenance (O&M) and the validated capital improvement program (CIP), after subtracting other projected revenues, including property taxes, from our total revenue and spending requirements. The issue with using these rates came from the Ordinance that provides for Permit User rates. L Farm No.o M,3 R.I. avovm Page 2 � L Book Page 12 ttachment 2 IIttemNumber ADM08-09 Industrial Rates- Net Cost Of Service Methodology Schedule of Estimated Impact on Permit Users Percentage Increase Feel Year 07-06 A0.1 Cl,eNe Under her Gl Cost of Service (1) ProNeeE FY 0"Est Charges Under the Net Cast of Service MelNaEolo9y(1) Tell WO{vea ISSel130D_Total TSS Ell ClIanas BOD Charms TSB Charm LINs Tu-Qml NatP.3mLL Natl3mlL Chahua Aeet OILEdt GOfAPANX NAME 131 _ L_M.90 Bllq y. ANDRES TECHNICAL PUTING INC _ _0,0455 0.09W 00950 $35 $33 $49 $182 f179 $3 330 536 $40 f20t 3198 fil S 9 C OIL CORPORATION 0.0291 00000 0.0000. $22 30 30 $1021 $151 $31 $24- 30 _ SO $201 $170 55214 AVIATION EQUIPMENT,INC, J_0.4071 04W 0.4540 $313 SIM $237 $7071 _ $578 $129 $342 S181 $193 $716 3587 455% PARAMOUNT DISC MANUFACTURING,INC. 1 0289 026X 0.IND $204 $91 $103 S3991 $297 $102 $213 $105 $84 N12 $310 3N% ALUMINUM PRECISION PRODUCTS INC,SUSAN 5)997 551M 1.0980 $2921 f1917 $989 f5.821' 34.2511 _ _$1,553 f3.193 32202 $806 $6,201 14,633 295% TRANSLINETECHNOLOGYINC. 0.2050 037M 0.0830 Sim $129 $43 $330 _ S230 $100 $172 $149 E35 5356 $256 254% TAYLOR-DUNN MANUFACTURING COMPANY _L.13ar 2A650 2.253o U74 $857 E1,174 S2905 $2.015 3330 f951 E985 1957 $2,897 f2007 22513 ALLIED PACIFIC META STAMPING _ _ I 0,4454 104M OS740 f345' $365 S143 $8521___ $515 0117 13" f419 $116 $912 Ole 17M xZ%ELECTRONICS 0.1517 0.1820 DOM $117 $63 $15 $1951_ $105 no S127 $73 $12 $213 _ _$10 137% POWOERCOAT SERVICES,INC N 0.2N5 0.09W 0.0950 Sim $33 $49 f2391 $133 __Sim $171 $38 $40 SU91 SIN. 131% PROGRESSIVE MAMETING 1.55N 1.3w(I 1.2470 $1052 $470 $65o $2.1711 _$1.180 _ _ 3N1 f1,150 M39 $530 $2.2191 _ N2L . .11 AMENIMA%6UILDING PRODUCTS INC. 1.0636 07650 02450 f018 f266 f110 ft,111, $fil] SNI__ E894 3JOfi ftp4 $1,303. SFM l/9% PRECISION POWDERCOATING INC 0.X104 0.1460 000401 $154 $86 Oa $294 $149 _. 3145 $IN $98 $44 $311 1N tt4X CANNON EQUIPMENT WEST INC _ 0.8737 1.Dew, 0.9W01 $672 $370 $516 $1.5051 _ $768 $M $734 $434 3421 31,589 _ M A R 0SERVICE _ -0.2080 04340 _0 Cs60 $160 $151 $225 $537! $263 U74 S175 $173 $184 $533 S259 04% O'DONNELL OIL.LLC 04611 00190 Do,% 9351 $7 $to S371 $156 $215 $387 $8 $8 NO3 $IN NX INDEPENDEAT FORGE COMPANY 0.2108 0,2890 0.28% $162 $101 $151 $413 f1.09 $224 $177 $115 $123 N15 $191 99% ELECTRORACK PRODUCTS CO.INC. 04386 13040 073M $337 $419 $384 $1,140 $509 $632 $369 5481 $314 31,163 {932 It DATA AIRE INC.A2 0.9425 1,7490 1.6530 $724 $608 $861 $2194, $998 f1,1961 $792 $699. $702 $2193 aN -N% DUCOMMUN AEROSTRUCTURES.INC, 1.6430 33320 164M $2.031 $2.213 $856 $5.1001 $2,100 $3,000 ST221 $2542 S698 35.461 {7�q0 92% LOS NGELES IMESC COMMUNICATIONS 0.6005 1.4930 1I500 $537 f696 f759 15.5111 f674 $938 $SN f561 f678 15987 {1N 9- NU-TEC POWDER COATING MUNICATIONS LLC__ 8191 13A830 5.5570 f$326 $$119 N.Sw $1 S5111 $$212 f$32, $356 $$137 E3$711 f1 S 5 f sm m GEORGPOWOER CORING _ _ OA120 0.5430 366W 5356 5308 910 E93 521E 3150 5356 f245 5$7158 3565 ."D 7{% DE0RDUSTRIESI COMPANY PN 05133 111.13W66W 09430 $I.B54 395 3$579' fu91 $$Iat $614 $$951: $$431 $W65 $$4011 f$1,497 N,N9 7" AIR INOU WCLl SEINC APCC COMPANY _ 11258 34a(0 17620 f395 1.96 $919 f1,4851-$1226 38511 $90 N65 $749 OD69 SNB I'm AMCORSUNCLIPSEI INC _0.2837 00410 I1s101 $865$218 $1,$14 5$211 $2501 St SW $SI51 $238 SL374 S$17 $272 fits l VEECO EPLATIN FNC IN .e2 _ 0.6313 Dual 004101 f210 120 SP _ f2Nl _Sv7 U96IST $538 $16138 147 927E f115 m INUMCPUTING INC 0.6998 034fi0 0Mi $$485me ftso $1so - nmj 5290 53M $588 f1so $147 $816 8130 %% BNOY TEARACECTROP IS - I 0.4388 00000 0.00001 $336 81 E1 S535f_ $165 SV $369 93 W $511 Sir N% ALLOY TECH ELELTRYPOLI9MING INC. 0A385 00570 0.1170 E766 $20 $30 N79 $596 f220, 3931 $23 $24 S5n SIN N% PLEGEL OIL COMPANY BLATTNER-A.NA.' -i a29751 0.0570 00570 ftt66 493 734 S1,M5 .422 0.4,16 $1931 Sb 045 $$1,9788.791 n53 02% ki�PETROLLRIIB_EI_ER CO. _ _ 1 Sd]T51 7.10)0 ].1870 52.64E f?4so $3.)J4 $236 $J.$76 13162 ES269 $2.863 $].0so 3$260 53.131 N% GENERAL CE DAM, 09000 D0000 52M$363 30 53 32v 378 $INl $397 62 88 f047 3w H% GFNEMLMPROD PRODUCTS COMPANY INC _ OA720I UIWU 0A730 3J63 f$52 5353 $$215 $$72 f6Nj $140 f$60 f$28 $LOW NN 9NL JELLCOPIJRE�C EMPROER INC COMPANY I _ _ ones;BI.rg 263M _04570 $128Sue 915 $35 1884 623 f1H - $597 051 345 $329 TU NX JELECOCONTATS INC. _ 0]ON 29sw al 045 $333 $424 $$977 $623 f$577 f59] fS383 $J45 $1.060 M2 91% SELECT EXTRUSION _ 00TxMaOM 0.9580 DIBc f545 W7 $99 f97] $594 5057 $596 $525 S81 ft,000 S]R N% MAGNETIC EMETALSNRPORAC. -' 12176 3.3140 13110 SK9$936 p51 _ N05 f1,651 f594 NAN f59 3347 S558$495 U.N0 S3{3 U% MAGNENTRUCK D CORPORATION 1.'l163 5.5740 1.1000 f93fi 5SMIl Sfi09 $3590 E1566 sits $1,023 $513 $me N.577 _{UM NX ANANEMEUSE DEPOTNBIN WASH- 74339 1N50, 110801. _ ,714 N441 i669 $2252 .701 - 311p3{_ tals.247 5513 ,529 $5,105 9392'' N% WEYERRAEUSER COMPANY tA3]9 >0.9120, SN9DI 35.714 $34,N41 il_N5 f3?152 f8.781' S21A71 _ N.24). f18.319 $1,510 - {39,1p5 312W N% CIRCUIT TECH INC _ _ 02075 0ass, 0.15201 EI59 S1621 - $70 _ S401 _S124 3277 _$174 - $106 $05 _ M25 Sim N% LOCI GRAPHICS INC - 0.5720 01720 6.0680: f440 Sell N51 $536 S15e 0379 $481 S69. S291 - $579 {IRA N% ExPEDG MEDIA LLC 3.9139 2 M50 2.05501 $3.008 $7151 51,0711_ $4.791 SU13_ N.N7_ ._ f5R09 $821 N73 $4.993 111.702 0% BECKMAN CWLTER,INC. 13670E 163220 15. 9 , $10657 $5642; 38,3171__$24.8281 N,149 _ {19,131 $11.562 $6,481 $6763 _ -I , . _�,9a6 N,4N N% N CAELEC1tONIC3 INC, , 51003t Et721 311N. i12M N088 f1.976 f957 $ f -013 q% 0STA-M CORPORATION#2 888T 1.SN 0610 529 $557 Sul) {145l 47% (1)Utilizing Flow Data from FY 0B-07 (2)-Tax Credits based on Taxes paid in FY 06-07 (3)-Per Million Gallons (4)Per Thousand Pounds 1 ttachment 2 IIttem Number ADMOB-09 Industrial Rates- Net Cost Of Service Methodology Schedule of Estimated Impact on Permit Users Percentage Increase Fiscal Year 07i.8&11 Cluiges Ordef oe Gmss Cost of Sense Meloo0oloal(1) F opose0 FY 00,09 Est citames Uweren Not Cosl of Sl MONWoll Itl naea`4. TmIVOhm TpYHmTN3LTgi Flow68 S3 eoDCIA lea lines Lean TUCMO bOSp1®IS I1R[�l �f� Over Prlor (3) L: [4) fd IB8.03 3a;B 520 P9 rvs CW^K _ UOD Ed J09 S. iTS. Zip"u.CI- CAA _Pd4r v . WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY R _ 1E218 SAM I.1160 $1.172 $1.333 S581 r ".No - $820 $2,267 51?81 $1.5311 Silos' $3.287 $1,020 IS% PACIFIO WESTERN CONTAINER O.B092' ZA0a01_ 1.4100 $661, $70 $735 $2.162 $630 31,S32. $730 U731 __ S599 $2.202 $670 M% GERARD ROOFING TECHNOLOGIES.LLP � _- 33351 1.11001 0.0% E2,563 $1082 $253 $3,898 $935 $2,901 $2.802 $1.242 $206 34.251 $1.288 "16 ELECTR SPECIALITIES CORPORATION 0.1710� OA10OI 0AM Etta 5$68 $102 E352 1$9836 ON $3. f170 Ego $555 S161 41% NENLEN SPECULmES INCLNG. _ o. l ol1 O'OwO $359 Sso 5102 5530 EIJ2 f $789 3$0 $83 f555 5161 41% GARGOIL PRODUCTION LLC 091N1_ 00000 00000 5721 EO 301 ST21 EIB2 3510 f]B9 SO SO fID9 3329 41% METAL POWDER PRODUCTS-ANAHEIM 1.11801 112J0 0.)110 $059 N25 S3]01 N.B55 _- 127 ,210 $939 SM9 140 St]30 2502 4 % M INDUSTRIES,CANNON I M1891 205720 T1750 $17,055 38.346 33]Y S3a140 ST.096 i2i 114 $18.646 $10,735 $3,No $33A30 $9.316 YO% PIER ENSORS&TAPANY ST - __ 010101 0.0000 NOB 30 SO -S40B EBB S2 _ .865 $0 EO fH6 f126 39% NC OIL COM50TARGETING SYSTEMS.M. am 3f0001 am f]8391 N.0so 515So 55,2461 f1.$88 0U201 4446 $19$0 f12$0 fW6 E$126 i9% NEUTRONIC STAMPING AM PLATNG 1.12211 031940 OOB<0 36651 _ SJJ $49 E9451 $212 $7331 $943 $38 $ao $1.021 f2B8 30% BOEING COMPANY BUOU 211 21799'. 08270 30270 01818' $1.262 N890 S4.BPI $1.351 $3.470 $1,832 SIMI) $1541 N,822 $1,352 30% BODYCOTE THERMAL PROCESSING I 3.0021 1.2750 1]750 f2AU1. 34aJ 5661 N.U51 034 f3,58L $2.623 f60S EN2 f3,574 3993 38% aE0#ING PLATING 1 0.9078 0,1710 0.1710 _ am! $59 $89 f046 $193 _ 365]1 $763 NB $73 S904 $251 315% AMP ELECTRONICS INC _J 1]050 3.a630 Z.9i30 SlIll $1204 $1.549 ICON $1,085 f2,9791 31<33 $1,383 $1,263 $41080 26101 37% OLYMPIC POWDER COATINGS INC. _ 0,2171 0.Q70 Ob70 $167 $142 $212 85201 $142 "IS $182 $163 $173 _ $518 _ S139 J]% WASTE MANAGEMENTOF ADRARGETMN$FER 1.1917 J5640 0.6270 S370 31 240 S327 #,Mt $513 f$202 Stool f1,101 $$2611427 f2,e32 arm sw 37% PRECISION ANODIZING AND PLATING -1 0,0552 1A040 011401 S$42 f$49 5523 � 3So, f003 3404 to N27 5$232 _ 3350 36% a RANGE P. 00652 0.6040 0.1110'. N2 6. 159 S734 So, ,M 277 226 934 3]01 in 36% ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER - 1 100760 30.1630 301630 Sn.$6. N0$57 N5,$a5985 E37202' i10.So f $lN f12,$66 N2A65 Et3.$69 N_Can: N,N3 30% MSS PLATE TECH,INC. I 07657 0.0530 0.1630 589 SA $28 S202. Ss]I W S66 $21 $23 E2611 $SE i0% UM PLAO IG INC1 01.3598 32W 11260 $5B9 11B 567 5835i i1271 SSN 3113 ftt 478 fN7. 3130 35% CREST CGAASTINC. _ 1,5117 197BO 08010 $1.239 3$688 S4117 Sz3SII 5003 f21U $1,ta] f$790 $1]8 12.90"All S751am 33% TAOR INA CASTING CO. _ 2,3110 48180 00020 512J9 _ .676 Sat] S2,JNI- M9J: N,B51 $1.JN 5790_ _S_340 _ R,NSI Sul 34% AUT( NA INDUSTRIES.EMOF WAS - 0.0730 1BIBO, 0.0200. $l Sw $$373 $t fA4631 SSBOI_ 372 {1,$61 $U28 Ell - - $NOS $126 34% ARASSTEORSYSTEMOF WASNNGION,W. i- -0.0130 019601 00200 an E$68 510 - 51301 S3i Nn S61 N78 $8 {49B - am 34% CRASSTECNINC.A2 - 18212OSE5 90170 08W $631 136 St02 p901 1„ NN - N96 $IB 307 _ Silou$4.6" .In 34% BRDC ELECTRONICS INC.CORP. 1 0.2716 9.0170 03390 $209 $$789 Sa50 M211 - f7]1 f3W f690 $3.906 $144 S6,039. t"21 34% BASIC ELE_CTRONIC_5_I_ 0.San 3.2680 09090 1.20_5 f289 S1]7 KIN" W3 pA .,,A E786 51N N,Ta, .375 34% IOBOH ELECTRONICS A2 _1 1.5679 9aT60 09090 $L205 E3.296 EOaN.9R3 ]_ f1,14 $1,318 fJ]Bfi _ E388 f0,489 N,3]0 34% SUNCLIPSE.INC. OBA CORRU NRAR 11) 114259 351450 1.6950 $8782 $12.259 $853 121.92411 _ ICA10 $9,601 $14.080 _ $720 _$U,40:_ _ $6,122 MIS -_ SOWERFUSK.INC. 1 0.3930 406W 0.2710 $302499 f231 $118 f0311, E142 fA8 $330 $222 N16 no NBO ]E% UNNERSAL ALLOY CORP. _ 1_63257 010 0 4.0000 51$250 f1$36 E2S27 $SIAS,,._ N Sul {3,iS4 U74 E1,$42 3�Su M9 7 N.an 33% ACROBU01 TECHNR INCOLOGI 72893 0.1040 0.MioAll 5603 S36 015 S7571 5131 3244 521a 300 _ 8281 _ W) 0B3 33% SOUTH OAST CE&LNG. 7.289J J.P4p 19490 f5603 E11J9 ELO15 E7]571 fl5an _ $OAM $Sein1.503 $1.3$0 $BIN f0.2N f_2AS 32% SOUTHbOASTgL COR7U,IG N 0U31 00000 VOW_ S$448 SO EO S$5391 0231 f1m i1503 S0 {1,BIT $133 31% U PAU.0 IMERCOMMUNITY HOSPRK 26928 561C S.l $2.070 $1,953 S2,925 $6,941 �- NAM 2A03 $2243 -323B55 all S13B 31% PRECIOUS METALS FLARNG OS6lt 01050 0.1050 54ae E37 S56 f539 N00 {130 N9O E42 SR itii _ 1M 31% SUPERIOR PROCESSING 07425 02540 0.3550 $S661571 537 S55 3800 N32 fBN Hui $617 SAS lal SIW 31% IURBOR(RUCK BODIES INC. 07425 15aw 1.3550 55)t fS37 f70fi S1.BN f112 {1A02 fB21 E61> ES]e {1.011 M1! - 10% ADVANCE TECH PUTING INC.13 12408 0 Saw 1 0.2210 $954 S142! I E1,21I $1,001 N.w31 $163 S941 $1,300'. am 2316 DIM AEROSPACE TRANSPARENCY SYSI 197604 525101 4.0230 $15.188 ltt_BZBI $2,0% $19.111 S392S N 1B3_ _$1B,B051 $2.096 _ $17021 $2.0.412 _ ill 20% SPEEDY CIRCUITS FACILITY 1 02402 011 o.IW- $185 Simi 3256 55811 tE0 SIt1 _ S1B) S1B1� f1921 am __ N2B � m UNITIED CO.,ISHINGOPURNG -� 05229 0� O.tOBO 5102 _ it $SsS57 f201I fin SMf;�--T- f2N fill-0 20% EATON AEROSPACE. O.,INC. 16516 SB'r201 01900 A N.0% 107 32,� tt,19 _ 319Y, _323MI_ ____ M N.701 3701 2B% EATON AEROSPACE.LLC 19516 trial'. 2.1210 f1,269-_� $1107 34.170 m 1 S1AN', t012 SBOJ N,M2 !TN a21196 l GTIILIIU CYLINDERS AUN.OF AM 11920 1.79W'. O.Bt]OI 33.223' JB301 f72fi_ .. .2T1 !B4 62JI 11�� .5081 f100S b (1)Utilizing Flow Data from FY 06-07 (2)-Tax Credits based on Taxes paid in FY 06-07 (3)-Per Million Gallons (4)Per Thousand Pounds 2 Attachment 2 Item Number AOM08-09 Industrial Rates- Net Cost Of Service Methodology Schedule of Estimated Impact on Permit there Percentage Increase F 1Y.,070 Anal UMmew Omss Cwi d5w,fw MMN001 1 FY 0601 Est Ismum UOdNMS NO C9Ma1BaNlu MMNx01M(1) 1r l'� yo T >f, 5` l� �i}- ��TarT9e+Awr.`arrmm: eaoa.ee' r.' -"1,rK^ n '��I a ".�E' 'y11 L71p^ri �I,.. �' '.'�. I. Wi�`$v1h T,T;i:'eu' F_mm:,'am Pnar ..i..__ MAOIN I � Si.:ad� 1•=.. l, ' VE S _ ] 251N0 3.e1N_ Sze3t EB earl 1, I 18A1G� t8] ' 0 O 10 _ +et tt% _.y .._ - iw E911 __._f163 __. 1N� 1943 ftro 27%CRITERION SUCHINE WORKS " " _ 0e110 ObBO O3B10 si SW "S MI- f161 SUNCUPSE INC.(CORRUOaTOR PLAr1T 208]B, 20 +1BBOJ $156B_ Ea a92 i01B �O rot EI226__ A] S1.1N f074 _i506 it19BT m522 21% ARROWHEAD PRODUCTS RPORATON �_� _B 188810 ]N10 ]11 55912 fi,1- 1 14 '$J 1 f]862 f8]BO s3,]99 1 6 S].Ne 20% GORILIASPOIASHINGANDPIATINGCORP.__ . _ 8=300 0.130Dt ">(CN, f6J9 f11. f1.3]] _ 1 f1i1]1 BB2 _ {13] ,. . 768 " 1,QS ou 26% __ IOW S1B7 NBf sw, SIN f21B- "-j 118, sm 25% UOE CNEAIMAL WC L_]1N, ".. 06]M' 0.8890 - $639 f]04 u HRBRAflMtERY 9.w01. 1]A]NO.....(_90W F. W.558 _'_._ >�-219.. N1 494 - $e.128, 353.69) it,w� f31.N1 f122401. U% MASK TECHNOLOGY INC. O.N2sl 0]B2p 0.1900 6M5 Srro u I.Isa g13T NN - . SM $310 . .. .gel -i1211 uN 23% SOO RIX V a�_ .Iss - o.+oro w0: f6.]BB',, a10] Seael $621_ SO.= $973 SM. ON A.Nf s1Au. nx MTA SOLDERP4C EMI " aano 01200 aTsly 3ro 183 31�, 7401 SON _ w 1 i4N N1 t3% soUnlCMBT WATER _ _ �-_ 01480 01590 s1 ro6 - j621 _.iBO 9' S21B s+.w __ �1A+9 gBo. ... {T40{0 sm 2Jx MICIIWE]ALS INC N 4.1�614 691M 1230 Soma, N121 Sala AH $0,210 $3491 w 7Ne 3].BOB $!.sm 23% IUR]NMNxi9HOPPERB f]MB ]0]101 6810p 32565 VA61 $3.00 _ $BOB1I 111 NAN _ 528N 5362). St M3,. $0.130 31AN 22% 9AII IIOUSTON CO 1 22016,.,__ 1N50 O.N)0 st]3s SSW $40: g2Ae9, flS,_ $2404 - $1 60 _ f793 33.019_ sm 22% CONTINUOUSCW�INbC OP MTI�i ]3422_ Tarm_0.8180 S2.W _ W! $ML _ S]a25 sm f2,eae _ $2,809_ Ne9. _ _- __ g_S6B 395 moos 22% MIATI-FWEUNEELF.CIPSNDI PlC_ ,...1 106!!0 332N0 0Aw N114. 511,5M __I2N 519,9ie - 1.eN signs N611 N3Afi, f24x 3]]sB9, µ006 22% CADILLAC MT1xG 01C. _ t .Oi3w'__ 04800'0.� 67Q $167 ._ sm _ 61.1 _ $IT9. {w Sall, ___$IG2 _ gIN $_1,f99 390] 22% SANIANASERVICEB- 0.0126 002N 042N fID iB 14 $192 E16 NN $11, S10 �11 SM.( si9 3+% 99TEC PNOOV IS INC '" _ SM 07320 OWN St N], Sim f721 92 p85 596 {1yN9 fl.]]t - Np2 Sim S;ICB N80 21% NBOIL0FE TIONBTRLWr 10331 " Oases OOWO SM4 33% I $11]0, SB9 St040 " sm ]BB, S141i $213 21% NLMRK GPT_ NC. 0.5+35 "�W - 02w RO _ �fi08 $7, Wa sm Sim $11133 6622 an 20% ROCK INDUSTRIES tNC - - 0.tl1B "- 1w0 02)10 f-t_N� f6S9[ _ ""}1(1 _ N.18]� $104 S_10N SSB] _ WI IF,- 'NO E_120, 72f0 20% Ms.BELLOYRS- _ U$eU -02e10 02610� w ",_"" ,_ __ 9130 " " $32] _ SM i+D6 - 510/ 11 S129 sm 20% BURLINGTON ETIOINEERINO INC. 021]] 14w. O.tw SM, 1 ... R7L tt6 _ Aet __ N-7 --- " SB] __NWT $151 10% WEBER C GMPNI I Q3/20 SWBO 03480 361 _ +]81 - 218 $176. µ141 _ p!B SM N09 19% FRESHF 0 GEPT$ + 2w -11150)301 1� Ate '--I-- 'sm 11b rM NN NM 30 N -"peM i32 19% aLEKANDER OIL COMPANY 011B0 Gams Dow $135 so -�- f1N i1] _ � J S46-- E6654 _aMB. 1Y fw !el,iW fepgf 19% PAnOAN0000R OURETINC -- 2N1 - 04130 0+10� 1M 2 Nnll so Sao �2 AOVAOON COMPANY -� 012N 01110 9A4f0 r5gy, _. fNB - 3809 {BB �20 �Ht' 116 19% PRECISION RESOURCE CM.E'ORNN f.90N " MOO 00100 {2]13 S2AN- N 1,818, -__ i&w p032 E3 N3 I�]04 -if.1fB m 19% CUSTOM ENAt1ELIXS INC M. 10100 O.S16U, SIM Sul 1 -1 --$ w - lw .,_ 1i69 Tw' f .711 $lat 18% AR PIA NG6 a RNI H_ING INC. _ e]143 zes10 tA30o MAN -S+o26_ BN' - -i]eo _ __ 3ro� -at1]9 >jy,tN NAai +ex GEDROE TON BAKERIES-INC _ SAw _ Ma)90 121s0 Bti f11 N3 �9 fZ0,6N 10 {20.OS6 S30b0 1898] f23.W_ N,533 18% FASRKAnM CONC 0 TON CM71 _ <ew 3]a90 pi»2 _. S1 N0 {1yT3B 1,1 � �]B� fB.sOs _ µ.123 �1 ] ' - 1410 f/.�1f $1.10 18% FINELINE 6RGUM&TECHNOLOGY INC „ ( 146M 21200 01990 a11N $ro] " Sim 1,BN ps.2]I ._ m! $1230 17 gt,tes, sm 10% lem] "-oew o $uN sz01 --{b -715Be; Slee " f1A44 t1216; .. f23� s+e4 $1,6" 52U 17% 19200 HouY STR�T uc - - oOn 6I o0ax; a00W is2ei "� - 0 53Bi S"I " SMl i5]] so $0, SM $as 17% ECONOLGE Cwlwol PRO SIN U.�BCC 90020 STN, .. SON t1.W --.. f2,d]r( _TSB ON -. �601 ENO• _fB611 IS1 sf6i t]% STEPAN COMPANY _ &]2i4 Bw, 0.6]M 56111 5103201 - 1N,]li � waim ,w __-611B,w S1f7,M8 if6,M 17% i P9 TEcnnol_ogb _ 'mil ezOOD O.w10 SS e29_ - 2 4 ._ fly -wall fqw �,a11 A. "il ' _tfo,fre _ _but 17% CMIIOME TECNp2 ISM, 1SOw 0.0N0 31209. 354N _ +B y]N_ 1 w g+MB a- - s1s g1.A0 �1_2i 17% 910UX NONEEY A880ENTxNI COOP „__ 22w' t2BN+0 3]1W it 165 $43 3108 i15_T)9 - W g1 B19 "$1M - " 1]% pIR INOUSTPoEi"COMPANY APCC COMPANY 312 1 B19ro i]022I _ i2A51 6/211 f101M f1,,311II en N9 "- 3322]]66 is N9 1a�ON fly 17% -�. _0214 Gmso wG' _ _ " - 1�. 3g3 w� _ im gms ,f1w_3 1]x RIGIFLE)t TECHNOLOGY INC OB1M:, 0� 03028 gyros' AS--"T $1 _"Ri-'-i+w_ i+ fro, -s i_i 3_i>s +9% GOMTECHELECTRONICS INC. U.]00TI i.0330 0.0560. S2N 329 162 t (1)Utilizing Flow Data from FY 06-07 (2)-Tax Credits based on Taxes paid In FY 0"7 (3)-Per Million Gallons (4)Per Thousand Pounds 3 ttachment 2 IIttem Number ADMOB-09 Industrial Rates- Net Cost Of Service Methodology Schedule of Estimated impact on Permit Users Percentage Increase Fisr lYear WaGSA"bN CMI,m UMer IAe Gmss Casl 01 Service Muir 9Y(1) Pmpas_M F20809 Est CM19es UM NM Cast MSe .M.eMoaolo9y(1) TVaIl VoIUM IrIiIIII BOD.Tobl T55 Fbx Came ac)CMim TSE CMme less T.caI BeEe®LL tl1lE0mLL S'rDBreaArffi ord.ollrc COMPANY NAME ( ) YR. NORCAL8EV GE CO.INI1-WINj _ W.89851 337.0990- 1900 $39.122 S113,766 $1014 $153904 --_ - $4,116 f149,788 542.770 $130.676 $827 $174,273 E24,483 In WDUSTREL METAL FINISHING,11 0.20791 0,6920- BAIN $160 _$241 $62 $462 $31 W2 $175 E276 $5, $502 _ $70 19% A_LMATRON ELECTRONICS.INC. -� L 0 j Dun. 0.2000 S1.381 $296 S104 $17811 $115 31,666 $1510 83d0 $85 $1,935 - S90 1f% -- _ W.METATEF _ 2.080E 04110, 0.0000 $O 30 50 E1821 $9 $n] 50 E0 50 _ $970 W 1" ELMETATERRY FARM 3.SB23 544390' 0.5560 51816 $18157,985 $290$825 521,8401 _ .202 $20657NE6,11 10.97E E21]48 $236$673 f23,930 $3.31226.470 In NNOTTS BERRY FARM FOODS _ 13=31 45422]0_1.69401 $10,OJ9 115).965 562E 5166,&B _ 5230] f166,6411 f10.9]5 $IBIp64 5fi>3 E193.111 $36A]0 19% PULMUONE USA INC. li.B0071 268.3080I 03280 $13EW $93,320 $119 $1W,1251 $1.394 $10.731 S14963 $107.188 _ 97 - IZIUM $16,517 1M5 PRIME TECHNOLOGIES,INC. 4]5411 152850 0.05101 $3.654 $5,316 $339 - 0,310 $310 $8,9 - 7- OERMCQRMETICSLABSINC. 0.9171 883320 0.3300 5447 E30027 $172 SAM $182 00.40 5409 _ f34.490 $140 - 119 _ _f4.655 191E AMERICANCIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY INC. 4.9202 6.9860� 0.95W $3.782 $?221 E495 FHB $348 Kim 14.134 $2,551 $40a { ,M $00 in -_ GEORGE A.J NE OF CA IIALn WELL 14.8838 TM4 2BBW3p1 0.5400 511.440 E99A99 E261 $111,23E _ 5935 f110,]N 113.507 _ EItA266 $229 - fHr,022 $14)2r 15% GEORGE_A_._JHTBE BEVERAGES WELL _ 177041 0304e� 51381 $106 $30 61A96 $77 - $1.09 S1.488 $121 $24 11,03. Mal in SUNNY DELIGHT 6EVERAGE6 CO. 1 2536231 275A1NI 1.1620 $194M $95.967 E605 f118.00 f13" $114.710 $21,3121 $110,239 $494 $132.0351 $17.31f in _-. DEAN FOODS CO OF CA,INC. MILK PLANT) 35.630P 40114WI UA110 f2],3081_ 3140.564 E423 _S186J]3 51,672 f1Wj01 f29,9401 $161.454 $345 __5191,]39 saw I" HOUSE FOODS AMERICA CORPORATION 470T800 024.39501 2.6810 S36.182 $286,733, $1.397 024,3121 _ S2,547 $321.745 $39,5561 $329.3"6 $1.139 1370,OF $%M 1M PEPSSCOLA BOTRING GROUP - XLMO8, 811 2.0090 128.111191_.- 3309,333 $1.047 3335.4881 $1.9241 3,333,545 $27.428 f355.305_ $85" 1MRS565 f50.642 15-1 GRANDE F0005 gCALIFORNIq CORP. - 1.5819-5a8S7__OLL 0�.93W E1201 E20.401'. E405 _ 522,061� 52211_ S21,885 $1312 f23,433i S395 525,141 S3.T/6 19B STRR1ET7A CIRCUITS INC. LLC _I 62329811%0 , 4, 417401 f03,281 S544168 $2,279 - 5609.]20 ".3201 1106.409 _$69,182 f625A10i_ i1,859 $696.060 � In MURRIETiq CIRCUITS INC - _ 1 198771 11370 _ 0.33901 51.512 $395 _ $177 Meer $125- f1959 $1,653 1454- $144 SZ252 _ fM2 15i VAN LAW FOOD PRODUCTS,INC. _ 1 683131_- 44 _49191MI 200 55.251 EL11093 $108E sin.,a9 __ 1399 ftl6890 _ f5740 ft%520 E868 S203,IN' 19 1R CCDA WATERS L LC _ 1 15804.E 14360. 0,8090 $12148 $499 $421 f13,069 $709 f12]30 f13201 �]41 f3d4 $14,19f f1.8M' 16% FULLERTON CULTURED SPECIALTIES _ - 2212I5 5462100 1.44]0 517008 _ E109.900 S754 5201,12 S1.Od2 13068119 318,594 _ E2161141_ 5615. f33),4tT - SJ01a 15% GOODWIN COMPANY 185"0 75822D 059Q f1<25 $26.372 $309 $28,108 E156 127950, - 51.5E8 530291 $252 02,161 Kim In STE-MER CORP.DB4 ALSCO - 24.9641 2090530 1.5160 $19.190 $72.711 $791 E92.690 __$1,135 $91,555 1XI 563.517 Sfi45 $105.139 N3.SM . InAMERIPEC INC. _ - 250790 7696320 2]31ol $19,276 S2746a2 $1,423 $295,3411- 11,040 f2W 301. - $21,074 $315.458 S1j60 $337.692 $01M 19% __._PF- MC00DS INC. _ _ ]].ta89 3)Bfi 3030 2.7230 $2.0,067 $969.104 3I419 _$991.3901 f280 3991,tn 522,813 $I,113.128 __$1,157 f1,137,098 S_148,14111 15% IP C CAL FLEX INC. - 0.9687 0.73501 OA8501 $745 E256 $39 $1.3471 $133 $1,213 $814 $294 $20 $1.390 41in 1f% CLEUG S COMPANY _ 3,193fi 0-00001 OA000 11,409 f0. _ 501 77254� E64 S1.345 $1.541 50 30. _ 11.541 f139 19% CIRCUIT ACCESS,INC _ 09626 64Y10 0.2230 _ E)55 $2251 $3,06]I f626 E2596 _ _ _ CLEUGH'S FROZEN FWD$,INC. __ 11191E _191M10) 1.03b_ 510141 S66565 S_J 57/$84 $3.97_ $76,567 511Aefi E7fi461 f1>8 _ f66,006 f11.139 311f1 0,1D 5601. - S25 "Au E443 14% LINMBRISWIESTERNOPE3 - 78252 5J1Q 4.3UO3 12015 $151A. E2,0>t01 $6.114_ 5740 U.Sk $6576$203 E w S10] 16.034 $762 In In SEVEN PDO DOMING INGINC 70352 01140 0.1140 E6015 874 $59 _ I- 58.110 5286 0,01 E6576 546, NB f6,669 f91� 14% SEVEN T FA PQUALIT SERVICE C9.2300- 099.500 0.1230 53532E _ 1695 31.011 5352.139 E$95 210,06 $4V89 fJ5$798 f$s! f4o2.089 S50,704on 14% _ .__._-. - _ _ _--. _.._ _- i52._-. E2039. 3335 . 14%EFTFASTOWUTV SERVICE INC. 23540 19980 0.1230 SL609_-. Sfi95 f64 i2.60 E95 f2ATE 51970 3790 NORCAL BEVERAGE CO.INC.�B I 21 5131 933980 -11 WO E$2.533 f9386801 $6951 044,754 WI 044,154 518401 32303131, 011 f278.W! S15,10 14% FL TORO MEAT SHOP 1 329551 933980 006Q E2381 E324851 0171 f35.0! 0Sol f$%BM S$416 W.313i 00 540,61E SS,YM -14% UIIN INDUSTRIES SERVICES 1 0911351_ 114380 00550 $381 E$5001 $33r _ 0.034 SO 5404 f4161 f4401 E "' 110 14% MNCOINDUSTRIES INC. I 1.9135' 19360 00550 f1 q1 85001 m1 f2.000 169 51.930 --51.608'. 55I41 52J- f2.f08 _SM 14% F3(CELLO CIRCUITS MANUFACTURING CORP. 4B930 19940 0,2350. _ $3,146 $694 $14 $3,962 'Hal 0.797 SI $797 Simi f1,06 2539 14% INC O.C.INC DEA KINDRED HOSPITAL WEST. 63565 908W 9.000 S3349 $311% $4.732 $11,240 81471 9,70 13.6111 _ S3A291 SI $11.149 11.381 14% PRIMATE%INDUSTRIES INC. - 9.301 487M 049W E7,154 $1.05 058 $9.1071 1301 811,745 SI St 1 0101 f9,979 f1,231 14% WORLD WASTE TECHNOLOGIES.INC. e.9450 9752W 072a0 $3,0o1, E3]920: 0T71 $38.0981 101__ MM 14,1551 SISE08. f9An _ f4328 14% DARUNGINTERNATIGNALINC. 5259] "6520 00470 S4,043 515.530: -- 041 $19,5981 Sul $11,516 P.M] $17= S20 f23.2T6 0,)32 14% TACWEST,INO. 13.0791 14723701 02710 S10.053 $51,2111 041 Efi1.405---- w-F wiA 1109WI sw 015 Sm.9P _ $9,92 14% -- _ II CHRONETECH,INC. 52396 4"4101 06660 E4,0271 $1 S"51 �$5,918 1238 f 60 54.40' 0.T71 00'. 0A0 ST]] 14% BRASSTECH.INC- - 174521 286301 2M40 - - $1,3411 $9261 JI.MH $3541 3401 $3.10 $1.486' 0A64 SI,6Y1 f350 _ f121 14% STATEK CORPORATION - SIMI 4.0101 20830. $2.812' -- f78097 1 I $11, 211 0W01� I I f1205i 059 in (1)Utilizing Flow Data from FY 06-07 (2)-Tax Credits based on Taxes paid in FY 06-07 (3)-Per Million Gallons (4)Per Thousand Pounds 4 Attachment Number I ADM08-09 Industrial Rates- Net Cost Of Service Methodology Schedule of Estimated Impact on Permit Users Percentage Increase F; 1 Year 07118 AO%M1 CIrryN MxrftS SCml Of MMaAOJOIN,(1) L_ PmpoW PY 0BL9 Est CNryes Utlr tle Hit COR Of 5el MBAOSde 11 I reaae IMI VBAm Tpt2HgSYffi F45CseOA S Clmv LPL Geoff 1riP. ®2 51P1[mll Clip.M1vnl �;tf1][ COPAN ]i R _L_ iu JOHN A.THOMAS 9.5581 619970 00110. 57.345 $22.259 S6 S29.610 50 $29.10 U030 S25,567 55 U3.601 $3,992 13% STAINLESS MICROPOLISH.INC. 23200.1.49W ObWD S1)83 $521 51% _ 62'W $103 $2.350 ft9a9 MW $127 _$2.615 U17 13% SOUTH COAST CIRCUITS$3 2.80041 13.2110 0.3300 $2.152 $4.595 SIM _ WWO $68 $6.856 f_2.353 WM 61" U,IIS _ fN! U% UNITED CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY INC. - Ditto; DAIW O.U90. $429 $214 $177 - HIM $62 S758 Sb9 Ubi SI1Al fl59 5101 13% PRECON.INC. 0A101I 1.7750 023TO $3151 5617 $123 _ f1A56 $37 $1.019, U45 �_ I N__011_ _ IN sinU% STRIP CLEAN COMPANY O50U1 0.0130 00130 Cat $5 $7 5403 $15 MY U28 N NI SU9 N1 13% - -_ - - _ _- - _ _ _. 13%DOS CUARDA OFFSHORE RES_LLC 9.401T= N.3890 0.02M S)32! 58.a83 115 515.727 $121 f15,N8 STSI N.)YI 121 $17.M _ ALSTYLE APPAREL-AID INC. 404.1113', 1,338.1090 623Q $310512,-- S465.408 U.248 STT9,260 f4.195 {T75,W1 --i339b)5 f5FAM5,_ ANI - -fU61Nl _ S1U,T2) 13% DAWN FOOD PRODUCTS.INC. - 2.TE81 __6.35B19U', 2A140 f2.1031 f22152 $t]SB f25,512 S0 US,St2 -- - U]N {25.N1 N.WBr _ _N�.1N____ 13% IDEAL ANODIZING INC. -i - - amiB 0.71N. 0.72W ".1F' UN $377 56.700 $285 MY! _ N.>ZB $287 IWF1 ITAN !!2r IA ANAHEIM PLATING AL POLISHING INISHIO. NC, --I can-__ u220311 -Im ounso "IN 5388 SN7$112 S24$3. 0 $127 U,?71 - S1.9o2 05ut) fN21__ 125N. _ 3iM 13% ULTRA-PURE METAL FWSNING.INC. _ 128)r 01130 01150 UIBO f)< f112 f3.466 S12] O,3N U586 fN Ntl N.]N W1 U% CNNOMA SYSTEMS PARTNERS 12)f3Nl 123 NN IA510 f97)20.._ $43.022 $704 $111.446 U234 l i,]13 {10BN2 $49.416 _ SNI _ i1N.lNI i11,q I3% KIMBERLY�ARK WORLOWOE,INC. 455.7600- 4F251)01 -2.1)O441 S35031Ti f154516 S3,962 $508,790 Mass W302 S302975 _ f1]).4112 1 fSN,W $411.155 13% ANOMIL ENT.DBA oANCO METAL SURFACING 73581 217201 05170 S56N1 S755 S269 N,6N $223 "A SunMiss _ f42r0 NLl if% NOLIACOILCOMPANY 15318'. 009N 0.0180 $1193' M1 f10. $1236 $35 $1.21 __- $1.304 fJA'. - Im SILO In - _ ED - -__ SAJNMI COASTLINE FINISHING CORPft 3011 11.23N 13NO S9.723 $I.9931 Imiti Sol_ 5335 U/,fN _N,UY _ N.1aD 23�911 N4111 $IAS1 U% 6 CALMEMETAL FN�ISNING OR . i.)5NI 21SB0 1]NO $4,524 U.024 UD91 f7702 UJS� N.1fT_ N,521 ft 192- i5r51 N?f0 DILL Ills 0.0.ALPINNEIILS INC. 5AANI S1W0. _OSWO 54,524 -U=NI_ btt! 66.960 S'5 - So" N.9Y f2.440 12W 12,N0 W) @% CALIF.CONSOLIDATED WATER PURIFICATION 1331U' L25N1 012Y $10.233 FIT. {NI SIOJA5 - f2M NI,II!_UI,18] f514 __ 1153 f11,)N fLT! � in J6RDEBURRINGIM.52 _ 1]N) 5.1MI 0.WOO f1 8 SI,Tp ___f1Ni_ U,019 f2] _N,N_! S1.IN U.059 _ _ f129 U,356 USE In WESTERN YARN DYEING INC. - 302821, I3.b001 0.3340 $23.645 SI5116; $1741 lo.935 S2NI_ U5.F9 f17.Jfi2 S142. F3AF {I,YT .in _ _ CALAURUM INDUSTRIES INC. - iE010_ 33mi O.F90 55.998 N101 ib21 f13501 $2i1' AN.SY f9bSNt U.W ffY U% ALL METALS PROCESSING OF OC.INC _ _ 78775_ 351101 1.U]0 U.901 U,5B01 fNB N2T91 -$313 A1!!5 N.Y1 S1815 fNt � -N.91> -- sm I^ WIM PACIFIC OCEAN DYEING AND FINISHNG 99%90 179 11690 I.N10 miLowW374 S2),So; sm f1F,164 iS652 _ NN,132 $24.41 531.668 N12 U15.NI f12,3N IIn n WWOHCS BRAN 129 79223 11.7890 1.»B0 - S22JM4 Hass: $7141 - i3).1F $709 SYA13 $24,b1 F.b2 WAS 129,N1 ytY 13% EXPOWESTERN ESTER ME ANDFWISNW ANA It).9239. 181aS44) 42IM61 SNAN.-- -1N.26B SM941 -SW.70 ' .972 St43,999� $$S.o2 SUsm -- - ,M f1F,370 /G WE5115CUsToMCAL CENTER ANAMlOM 10 2131 31.29b 21.39b1 U.3NI S],b6 f11.0F1 S$2'00 U.972 f$2,03. $1.04 N.501 UA40 f$2.276 -Yno I^ IACEYCUSTOf4 LINENS 126N IBO50 O.BE01 U.3N1 f071 U13 S2.f01 _ 197 f],O16 17.Y4 _ Wl _ $174 25,276 f04 In USRRYS DYEA WASH INC. 6965W 31.40N 0.40901 f15,7T61 _ U.N]I 570 212.7811 S89] f22,389 $B.21] _ N,153 SV4 $35,5]3 N.W In USOf _ Ifi6.10 231)250- ].3BN! f1Pon - SlOA111 ft]65 U 970 SB94 _M.987 f1Y,561 fY{SF. $447 U33.195 {$3.192 In DODLANINTUG&REFI 6.41f0 503M Iii.tsixi FAl1 22$139 U.$11 13$So f984 f29.986 ow 3]_3,109 544$9 fJ S75' U$78 U% STARPAINIINGA , SHING 27077 0.J990 0.02f0 f5N S139' SIt 3506 $10!_ iT6 f566 V59MI f9 f7F 284 In In TIODIZE COMPANY.INCANC 3.)0]] O.6U0 O.YN f2.061 _ S227 f2N 52563 $tool NA59 US)5 U01 S207 32.]u OF In LAN UNIFORM SUPPLY CO.,INC. --- - 204236 38 i200-0.6210--- 519,6N S13bi $324 $29,Y9 NI fI9,Y9 - S1M.182 SIS,YH f264 f]2,891 f1,10S 11% !WEST NEWPORT OIL COMPANY 725J02 1023010'. 0kid 555.755 {355131 $131 $91,470. 80 $91.470 f10,95, F0569 UN $101,932 UO,b2 11% SANMINA CORPORATION AIRWAY) 159147 1597Q 22380 $12233 _ SS150 f11N f169541 _ U_4 _U5,N1 S13.373 f6.352 S951 $20,706 $2,125 11% VICTORY CIRCUITS ANC _ _ _ 010" 06580 I]OSW f53. _ I. $21 fJ.NJ $$3321 S1A11 _ N213 U.W4 5$263 E]SW U,149 fU) 11% DATA ELECTRONIC SERVICES INC. _ _ _ SA9)11_ 23400 O.3N0. S2W5. NIA, 669 S3]N _0 fU3 879 S365 516 SS10 _ -- $34 $5371 N _. {UT 5146 $424 RB f598 JAZZ SEMICONDUCTOR 251.12711 21.39N1 21.m10: UN.01S S]MO $204 $L1b f1Y 0,932 $3,275 5$935 3546 U169 f)1t 11X CAMBRO MANUFACTURING ]5750- 84220 TI:MO U.)b $2 NJ SI04 34.01]. N1 U,9]2 53275 39]5 - f16fi SL])e _ f44 11X PUTNUM CIRCUITS,INC. OtA6 10fi20 00850 $133 fN9 SEMICOA SEMICONDULTdtS 161NI 84320 12840 USY UA29 f11.145 S211,05, 35,N9 W5,735 $211017 N5b $9089 3f70,6U 117 11% _ _- _ _ _ $37 KODAKP WATER SSINLABS CONDITIONING _ -I tSAl17i 012 0 2.15101 f11 1 1 1$4521 $13,901 $197 itt,F9 $1J051 W.W. 914 _ f13,2r! _ ft,321. Its xpoA15 PROCESSING LABS - I MJUN771M _ 30.51m 2.15101_ 1 S$1117 fl,ttl _ f13,9N1 f1F i13,U5 NA05 _ ,OW i914 f142N1 N 6F H% DAESHIN HINDWC. -I 0.]IN' OTIAi 0.45801 SSNI S1M71 --S2M $INS N)- 6fY' _ -SON - IWDI - - f1". -f10N1 UN 11% DAE SNl9IISA INC. - - --- 1N.12N N.Z)20' 2.)]501-- 512119211� fm,9N1 f1421 - $19.3111 1 f1-099 six To W2NI 1164 1 1pl 17151 11% (1)Utilizing Flow Data from FY 06-07 (2)-Tax Credits based on Taxes paid in FY 06-07 (3)-Per Million Gallons (4)Per Thousand Pounds 5 Attachment c Item I Number ADMOB-09 Industrial Rates- Net Cost Of Service Methodology _ Schedule Of Estimated Impact on Permit Users Percentage Increase Fleul Ye¢rOT-0B AquelCNr9esUMdNBNose Ce%d9erAU MBMoBd (1) Pmpoxtl FY 08AB Est ClRryaa UMsrtlle Nd CmtelSaNm Me09tlob9y(1 al lipAS i17, ACCU UN GR 0 11.15q 280250 OAaO� 510 it)�. BMa ., j -� -r - ...._-sTaz sJ,ueE see'_ qq/ - sen I= s)A42 $173 _ Ti s9es6 OUTN COAST CIRCUITS 04 -- JS1 I=KI.. 0_]3e0 3 M �5/9�-��-U- �814 i2A9d , _S1M -�)�11. NN 11 lACK O%IDE INDUSTRIES INC _ " - 3a)�T_O NB01�. 0.2190 E25B) EIJI�_ 1f8 82,80) -�H '- )q - !23'W' 1194 � �q ON_ 71M 11% A 151AGENERALMOSPmAl. ...._. 8.18q_... 1)A2T0 1T.0270 iron >IS.Bq..._.-. MA71. 521.0)0 iz -__ -• _� N 7Sn 11% SOUTX COp3TCIRCUIT3 INC - _ LIM 4A/301 ORa20 _ !q1 - {14p8 {162 Min- -�L _d1A% 1A19 _ REIDMG RNISNINO I -SIB 66b1q.- 4b2W Otae d1i�5-_ �ef�t- q 1 di8.882 1�' S,N 120AK- IBM tt% q 8 ! R 11 _�- 111 _. �__.._ 10111 Sig N SIR, ODVIDEOI CWNGANOTUMBLING _ 0.1�_ 00110 U.M 110.t _ S�Bi 11 - ��d N i113 _._ i90 __ 10 mi. $19 10% OO - MOW all _ i18 Na-w _n !i _ _ US, __ VS _�, - $19 In IECHPIATE.INC OOB50 OA9B0 p6�_._- i]3 ._ iK i1B2 _ 10.. B1 _ i3B . . iJB W !�q f,19 10% ANODYNE INC. --- J3119, OglO 0A8B0 52A45 8240 iJ08 l].OB1 $9]! f2,NO S2�)82. S]TS - ,2M m +0% MAIIXIANO MANUFACTURIN0.INF 19.]428 ]50)0 - 3A110 N911d --- St - !1 N8M4 S594' S1Eno -- 11BAa d,01 _.St4q _ 81A+J f0% ELEo"'OWCPRECIBNx13 IAL ES G 8.128 - 0101�-OA0711 2q,_ 142 _ 212 iB.800 100_ q0 - _1 --..-- _ _E8.e2B $103 S11B q,161 so" in (fl)> PAW C73T6�! .__ .1$186 21500 f.LWO ]6/. _ dam__ i'1N 93.Bi 177E q) ___ - .- $me i686. "4 ii)B f0% PACIFICaWRTZ�ILP .---- - -- 1.]146 1A910' - 0.8390 21010.- - - - -�- $519 __.sm _. _31Aq At Ndq 1,1- S5a _.SON ---aAw 7fIS 10% Cm OF HUIIIINGTON BEACHRREDEPARIMBR -. 2e5261_ O9]90 OOD10 S2.09B aq ._.. a _uaT9` ��_ _m _- awe �5.89 !1 �S,NB f 10% wONE-ERCIRcu1T9 - -- ss14B.. )91e0 3A3W AA21 d2e00 ._. Ad1 >{nAq s3411... sn 1 �MJi _. SJAN_ -- $1.200 4+f,RB litre. 10% WINON8;3 INC. .... _. 1z.BBS9.._ 1 _027g10 -i9e _ sat, d14e 710.SB� � sl sn �1Mq _ _ sTq d1211 �I+Ali o'M In EMBEE INCq -� -�3881_ )1240 01Q0 i247B _-987 ,4$0- 32)1 q�l _--_ 3 J2, -- 913 f+ua)B iFtO 10% ACTIVE PLATINO M.. d.7918 3ATq_ 02]30 - - .BB3..-_. S1.YM' 3112 iS.Oq; -�0 - lSOq_ S4A2T_ 1428 ... fi 1CO2. 10% OMNI METAL FlNI9HINQ WC WONS - a8310 - 08380 NA14 No SW "Iml Se]N _ S3i4 3198 N11 t0% AMNCELELEC)RO70C31NTEWIATONAL - a�682s 1)83/0 28030 32S.8B0 - g133 i1,dBO a9<e3` 21- Jiii 2!7 _ iI.016 - 111 4f� i11291 la% NAMILTON IAr1TERML3- _-_ _��. 8 -� - 1428801 - 25910 lb NB' ._. ._1 I. _ 1 _ _ �4.9)0 N SOAK 3124.. gB3e aA711 _. _ $5708, tATB �8.2�8�- Wall 10% RB CTRANSPORI'DYNAMxS COflP 1.3192 -- 27r40 _ 2TOo0 S1014, --- MW RA17 aaa Sis221_ a,ON _ lttq Sttq 11dT' l900 10% COA Gt LFABTENERS INC. y -185350 -.1e400 Q+2d) _ � $019 198.114 1.Befi: q sz3a2e dr 804, 0 sar•ais S1ae_n iCA SOUTNCOASTGL OO _.i 0.6118 _ 00900 MINN ¢qJ ate _!0 SdS Wi;;_ d12S - --�- -- L8 l0 sm M1 10% PAMCOMOLIDATEDVMTEfl OUTIIICT y 19.t614� _. 3.1130) _ 14M, - P.m: _- W16.iN �_ 513,1N - 510.100 1 3 dt N1,914 $1.00 10% GRTEL IBUIiONIC3 INC _.. r 4.B44T,_. 4At10 0.4BSo1 -J!.801 --_. $1A08 I IeaM -_ S4,156 .. - _.Cl10 - 16210 qe9 10% COOPER AND BRAIN INC. ---- 14.4g8 1.BOb - o.0420 $11.119--- SM. -- it I -� _ �1.N4 11130 10% MICR0.9EMI INIEG "._ -I -- _ -.S11- SNna - , 112,148 _ J811 1 �ARa pace ICI I N912B. . 2A490.. .3-I �,S]2, -..7529 WA01 180._ f341a _ WB12 SSilo _. N2B 214N3 a,IR 10% ORANGE COUNTY AL PgOC -- t0a878' 0.2g0 3]1>a' T,q9 5 1a. a,298 Dm - - MIM a113 5119 _ !tri ABM !>a 10% WHEEL SE7MCES GROUP,INL. - ta81B - 1aq 0.21BOI 1024 !a9 $114 fl.m: a7q __ 511+8 _ i1Bq 7189 t0% TNOMPSON ENERGY RESOURCES,LLC ISM",.. 09020 0.0p80 _ ii)6 --- Se.)e3 �. me'µ -- £2A81I 5178� - aA 9% CITY OF TU9TW,WATER SERVICE IN ST 9AO7B Oa2]0 00210 a,343 _ __ $4,7112 U MBaRx ORCHARDS A860CMTI0IL L ...I .,., TAB10 1Al AM - 2 -33 1 �8 '- Sim iT31s a01 - - a1 - aAa W611 9% -rt �0 aqe aTOt it3B SO 50.Of $)fo 9% -Un -8 0 GEMINI WDUSTFIES INC. _ J.8)4J O nwa M7a0 a,i07 5112 11 S2,4a SD i11q -- it]'14 _ 51q _ �tSt $ail 9% COUNTY OF ORANGE INTEORATEO WA9TEMGT 1eJ942- Oa1e0 U9W01 T.m 1 IA HABM PLATING CO INC. 2a20 OAIOD 018/0 1,9TT tU qi $L806� �518. )1 SBAOB _ 39Aa atY a)!1 ti,M SON 9% IRVINERANCMWATERGSTNCTAATS _ ) AOW- = /q10--OA010 lie! AS 105 S51101B IBA 9% HF1lA1AN PROPOERnES LLC DA114 -&LOW O.00Bo SBN Se82 IO -. � - _ e% _. _ CITY OFTUBTVl WATERSERVItEt77MaT(_ 191Ag1 0.01q OA1s0 1101Al2 _-- a d10 d101,3% - q - d110.Tq _�9 Y /11on $3�NB 9% PLACENMITTMTECHNNDAHOSPRAL.WC.,_ _.1.... --TiWSJi U.074111. ?7.OTq, afa1: 41 T; 1d.109: SiJ,503� 11q __- 3141 _ aABO ltpTS. W.97B I]�82_J_ e% -_ -- ._-�10A121 D63CUSTOM PLSnNGINC. DAT07J Q - 0.40 -1.._ 142 121 )y..., - '._ . .- }10 8 .. SH504, }/f,!]1 $f e1i SIG (1)Utilizing Flow Data from FY 0IW7 (2)-Tax Credits based on Taxes paid in FY 06-07 (3)-Per Mllllon Gallons (4)Per Thousand Pounds 6 ttachment 2 IIttem Number ADM08-09 Industrial Rates- Net Cost Of Service Methodology Schedule of Estimated Impact on Permit Users Percentage Increase Re Y.0748".1 CAMD94 Und6i ft Groe9 cwdsdrvim M69olft 1 P..d FY W419 EN.CMM.WdM9m Nei Cori or So .MePo IWIIt .Miu6:& #-`P' 't. Y� l 7tl6Li8B 1 tl1 + w Tti:tI D 6 eeDL 1 TIME- _S _ J 1 JJ1 W_ zor i4YU 9% AMETEKT- A C�EI C U. OE 1135411 Y9230 YB23D - 1. 1 Y 1. - 93 -_ f31B:. _ ITN B% _-_-" - _. _ - - a.ee� u Ise.. aB tf,en WEIDNINE iERWA_R CON ONE W0. 60..YWi,e6 o2130law _ 0 9w � 6,408 - 4 wD' eWo $ iu. N bl {�,,3e3]ms 1 tYa i�16-6 _� �1 ex sERRANowaTE�aolsrwef --_ tee01 oA190, o.nio. .__ 34SI ___ �),_ ,_... _____ o. ft i$ �3 . 14 �sN. ex NAMI a 1 1 1 2]50 .B530 1859 _ POWOEIICOATSERVICEB 6T0�t - j OW1i 041" 00830, -� f1�9 _ 148 ]64 f2] f7f i6 N 4) 1 11 B% �N9NdNE€IRK RGa0Uffi 1W-- � 121628 34030 1.ro10 Ill SIM i917 $139 $Stan 1>I 1�IIJ 97�1 {17,7Tr IM % { PowoEn coAn u1c _ olwo D1aso --emu - -_ to m' i+e4 - _. ` pw str ex O9 WAlERS OFAMENG,L3�_ . a,nsB 345ro, 13060 n642 i1302 feeD s tU.. S30.7N 11 ._ + 1 _ 4n4� _ }t]p 8% TTMTECXNOLOOIES INC UI841' 774ro 3)4D0 14I69 SI.W3 sl en 71 e, MI_ i17,96 _ �1� -$11+N) IT i _ iD) 3/�W B% CNAPMANMEDICAL CENTEit 8a6W 13.3430 13.3G0 14919 $4,641. nyW2 sleAH N�54; flMosr >�J,] wiitl "ice ""i+s,m ftLsm e% fiPEEDYCIRCl1118 DN.OF BJCI9CN. INC 8.1188 4.8110 0.6140 SII2N SUITS ii24 i4,49t i _ tz61e_ --F w2. SS46 {Neu Sm 9% CITY OF ANAM IM.w T�Ef2>a�VN b.M�, dtla O.YBIO 5b3W W _.. 19 R. -�_ SNRE�.II P1An-�COAT9dWC 1.W08 MISTS 0.0190 513� - -- s _ 1 17.�` -� II22 n 93] �3 vub 3tf2 % NI%SON MMETAL FWI9NIN0 - --I tA�O , + i190B6, i640 B10 - -_it).00 - it]W1 -- it,1� 1881 COLUfABWEA380CIA - -� 0111e _ OA890 am" ft]2, t2T _ "� -�, 196 nN $24 11201 315 8% 45130� 1.9480 09800 f7,492 Sen,. iaae ,KAM W,, �_. . ur _. .$374._ e4 �f]� e% 3 97- O3d1S-0. A.526� f244 {j2D, �DJ SM ".000 797-M _ m SMB a" .}W 8% SSU 6ROTNER88UPRY 8/C -t CHU tA880 0.DY10 $1233, , - p]B {48D 1 ail - .364 - _ �3 7t180 Mo- 0% 9GFlE -eOPONPAURRUURC1PENAAa'LEICN HUFlER9GATC3RIMY1EUw 0I C ARCNRO LOPACURULr IPAARN OITLCNiM IYUPNURRGMPn SU FON EOWTNORI SNLGSOJONET IO CWY�O_.I.NI_NCC. . _- -_Ja II_- JY1 A$bTB4114 T~"-_ - W WI _L yy_t4 gw 8%08 0� SW W74 N . SIR t fn T W -M Me fw 8%O JDet aasoTAW10.61a0 117 t730L us fe1 0.0� Se nBn f1 $110 NW eax03780 1b I14 $+ W.M "0746 -Sm WI - . I . m 714 a$ 6 11sa ]% / 021 1 $1,62a i0 $1 $IAI $1301 7IM {118 7% 6 4W OBro $24 899 ' .9 MB W2 $26 7% 14 11110 15501) 0.hr0 sm SM {Ii {619 $1.760 f % AL-fU61NUM Sim PROWCTS INC CENTRAL I L'� 11M �t�1IM� t016 p09 �,290 y SCYW _._i1100 _ _ NTB SW "NI, f131 ]% UWMC sRAL CORPORATION 2,. TEI60U 1�1800 ilavae' 'f2451] -1-Mf36,, N]2R TPoO' " -91,262 ..._ y 3281B1 SY ,9s1 .se6�sxI s0.1se ex CENTAL POWDER COATING 719n ui,a9 omen Eia4, "3e1 .,.-fii -i)$81 -ib'_ i2n__. +ee im sxn4 32]+ tt6 ex 9 ERWINDYOE1iN-iSIDE-W-E ENEROYLTD 01727 01050, 0.75711 SIM _� -W -__ Sltl -- _ GUN,NEWEVIRDNI AHEAUVALVESCE - 19061 - 12010 11.-M $IOn �4W _42< >T1,Yi n.9n jt 8C ,w S i94e 019,O�p, 100 % . f a✓- _..�_Foi yta 780 >M 41 _ --_ 3e o4i 94 eoe f1Ygfi {1443 % aRVIEWNDEV OPM6NTAL CENIEk 1 �1-7640 -N.nW 65. 104D - _ t _431957 {Ilg�_I1�9 I9,rn ex aCIENn�IC 9PaAY FINI$NE91NC. 0.2889, 1aem o13eD �Tro � -fi3S` � � _--fE� ROADRUNNER CIITCUR TECNNOLOGIES INC 4 7 01400 0.1400 in 1aro5 1�90 _ 99n _ _- 91 _ f 6% flIGID FLEX INTERNAn!)NAL __ O.N18 0])50 O1Da0 iJ01 - -IN , - r - 3261 1� _ _�W �J@. b% xYOCEM TYCOM CORPoMnON ... it r- 2�BD�... 289n _ Ft On _.fli 7 sa 7801 s14)i $13 -. 421I 11 _ t 31 N`9 W % RNAL ACTECNN OOY INC. � 1. - m 18 24 !�, � - 91B _ � _,$110 S% pf POWO COATIN C - �,A90 -- 05400 0.3960 - _ ) 5 11 S%SD �" f9� 6.� W 90FlNOCOMPANYIOENEMLFAC)__ _J_ 9d01 _, WILSON' 84.1110 914 a19 _ ,621 SB+ ON4._ S0/ S2BA2BJ 4% NELCO PRODUCTS WC. '- 24B 1838 62040 6.7 .�t461111 1 10 $2.711 _ 134 09] 62A7D t2211 am 4% CALIiOANIA STA UNIV GY ATFlI 11147�.--9� _ 8 _ iw Pea 3J1 _,_JB,S�D 151.351 ___w 131 _ 3. 775 n)1,�3 t3Ba2B - CYfE�ENGWEERED MATEIIALS INC. -_...... 0.1016� 6.13T00 0.1300_ - ._.� .. . ._ f69, 5193_. ... f1n n6 7nI OUALRYALUNINUMFORGE83 "6 NFL 0.0 0.0 1080, fOn 4 1 1 4% (1)Utilizing Flow Data from FY 08-07 (2)-Tax Credits based on Taxes paid in FY 06-07 (3)-Per Million Gallons (4)Per Thousand Pounds 7 ttachment 2 Item Number ADMOM9 Industrial Rates- Net Cost Of Service Methodology Schedule of Estimated Impact on Permit Users Percentage Increase Fbul Y.074M Aftwl ClwI UNs Me Goss SL,I of Scrvim MA ,hW.b9)(1) PT IW FY 081E E,'. Chaise,L,I,r 11.N.I Cost of S.,I..M611WObay(1) TSI.V haIII I911ILIMIL TW M F4w 2xug a M-Chim1 15S CMms Iaa T.CmOn me P.h Me Fall LhMnea han gy., D'L CCfMPANY NAME M (4) 14) _ JOINT FORCES TRAINING SASE,LOS ALAMT05 21.1310 38 99W 1 13SIDD $20854 S13,563 S124N $4.822 SO 346.923 522,19E $11171 $1L.117 SM494 $1,672ACCU 1% IRMNE ATE SENSORS CNIP.G__TORS INC. _ - 38381 027M. OLN30 523e6 52,3%, $S137 E6.273 $O IQiT]_ E$346 E$11L E$112 f6567 Sul M 1% IRYINEIENSOR$CORP. _ 027M 0P50_- 038J0 $209 5901 f13) $358 $0 INS_ E3d6 E$68 Sn2 U70 $12 3% flo�MANUFACTURED NC.AG 0.172E 0.1)10 0.1710 520E YJ9' 473 f655 EO P50 522E 66,1 _ E23 .710 $% 3% WEST ANAHEIM MEDICAL _ 0)Nt 1.6620 47N A LM78IN. f753 f1655 $0 51.914 E601 b"7 75M fl,)10 SN ]% TOYOTA ANEING DEVELOPMENT 20.9d59 d3.69M piao E16.100_ 515,19E f$2.160 554,042 52.12E f$5,195 E17.601 E12447 _ 518,5581 f53,dW fSIR 3% MIME EHRATHCAR HB.LLCENI - _ 15727 4.12W 11M0 E11Wi $1,49E 12.160_ 55.87E $980 f;LS 51926 E1.676 � f5,362 R33 3% PRIM OF NEW TORT BEACH. H.G 11.E)2) N.1202 21.129E $8.6011 fS592 A25i1 $23.65E 39s f2S,S7•_ $1.758 5$677 11039Y _ $33,01f f$75 ]% TUYOFNSPITAL NDMEDI MEDICAL 3392E 109M 1.13701 KIN 358E 5883' S3.0W 56 _ $1,3113 $4488 f62) fH0 Q,151 _ 314 3% UOSALAMITPITALAICAL CENTS CENTER _ 91332 _41.13)0 41.1P01 15.321 f3.874 $5.802 313.781i_ __ $4MI - _ 3"AN 14.70E 16.604 $1)51) $11,07E f,17 9% BOEINGC MP NY GRAHAM - i21032- 12561E 41.561E $$1,519 f15819 f2I,eW 351,Q91 _ f1S64. WJ11 E$1.770 Et s9Q 317,55E $31,013 $1,Sa 1% HARTWLOMPANY CORPORATION - 2ID32 5,1180 2354E 11,6191. 1780 $2,131 $5,07] S0. t3A1 S1170 f045 21,0W _ $5.170 SS9 1% MARTWELLCSTRIES ON 0U69 _ 0W80 A09W f1,M81 fl)80 f2,131 _f_5,83) $26 _Sf.111 SI.887 $2243 ft232 f$800 3ST 1% ILLETTIPERFORMANCE POW 0.2271 0SIM 0.31W f175 E211 S163 f'I91_ 50 1/11 $19, $125 _ _f232 180E f) 1% PERFOEPH HOPITAL INC 3.M99 0312E 0.312E $tl5' SIDE E618 .974 SO 1 .326 5079 EI33 344E SS t% ST.AOSEPHHOSRI.G1 33.709E 7038W )14910 $3$510 52 SON f1 S777 3$1.957 50so iS9.ON f2 U26 12837E 3290E4 $3938E $1$0 - 0% R T I ELENGINEECS.INC0045 1.0100 _ 1olw $3111 780E $526 51.95T SO $1.9A _ f63d S)W $6]4 $1,240 $0 O% SMITHS VIONICS. C. 0.4045 349V3 -31370 12331 3351 f526 $ 2W 10 f13M SM7 54p3 3428 f1,3<0 - -ft OX SMITHS AESmN-MAIOSPACE 1 END03831 34840 073M $L2321__-31+21-5 $$382 f$9311 _ E0, 31,03 _ ASa4SSM2 f$29fi $$333 S$926 39 O% CITY OF TUSTIN-MAINTENANCE YARD 036J1 3,7170 36870I S30d Stu - f301 eel $o .6" 2 - 105 3311 f930 27 .1% FOAM CO 1879E 3.711E SW70 Si,444 71,so 3Sio NA67t f0 11.317 �19 f1114 fTW7 11,35E .0 -1% METROPCWTSERVICES WATER DISTRICT 0.1434 0.2853 3.99W 510E N9 S14E 'Imij f0 IDS f119 _ _$114 _ $121 3354 - 7 .1% METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SO CA 02351 i99W 399W S$181 $in) 32_N1 N,979' SO F.9)S_ f$190 $$196 EL69) Pill 40, 4% WPLLL 0.2J51 OIBW .0M90 StBT 111E 5255 S95B1 S0 S9N ,982 5807. $067 SWt 33 -1% KAISER PERMANENIE MEDICAL CENTER 23.7796 495W0 49.SBW $10.2i8 t12.2u 825.831 E6 SON'_. $0 ffi1,333_ 519.982 f1980]' 221.OfiY $50,856 iM) - •1% HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN 611771 127554E 12).5540 S47.023 $44.365 156454 f157.6111 SO SIf)JMS $51.407 350155 554.19E 515615W _;ilzro •1% CHILOREN$NOSPITALOFORANGECOUNTY _ 14.0254 30.91101 30.9110 $11395 E10,751 $16.104 1382511 $0 $3601 S12.4.50 31234E $13134 f37.9I 4310 '•1% UCI MEDICAL CENTER _ - 50.1438 12Inixt121noo E44.691 E42,165 163.160 E150,0161 SO - SIMILM{ SM,558 SMA31 $51511 11M,600 - 41.215 4% SITJU ANAHEIE MEMORIALS MEDICAL 12)7W NSDQ1 3{.53W 59.61E $9,131 S13.677 $82.961' $0 _ N2,N1 12SAW $10.641 _ _ E11.318 plus i• _NQ .4% AN KEN MEMORIAL INSPECTION 309750 fi83U10 3203301 $ $749 $2$707 E34.648 f$2,295 E0 W515 S2$819 52$812 - - $26.25E 1$2.495 J2) 4% C-MST BEARING INSPECTION 0.975E 2093E 49470 1821 5721 U.0W S2,51fii SO 12,51{ N19 f8II E860 33,49E 713E �•f% CREST NATIONAL EMARHINSDIGITAL IT MEDIA 2P25 7941E 6941E 51.624 $1]31 31.5)) 36,122 $0 _ 3{.111 31,9311 _ f19M f2102 $6.072 -W 4% RENAL gESEARCH INSTITUTE LLC 2.1015 4,3N20 4.3820 $1.615 $1,524 $2.20 $5.422 So -#An Sl.)N $1,751 $1.862 $5.375 41f -1% SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOISON 2.SO30 5213E 5313E $1,922 E1.813 Q716 56,451 W N.Ni_ _ Q.101_520W f2,215 N.SN _ SSS •1% SECXRRiT INOUSTRIES.INC.__ 0.5332 T1120 1.1120 5410 $387 _ 55791 Sian $0 f1.A{ SIM f444 SO2 f1,S26 -Stt •1% NOBEL BIOLARE 0073E 0122E 0.122E E57 ER _ SMI 5192, E4684 N _ 02 E49 252 _ $201 _ $201 NIA DR.SMOGRAIE ENTERPRISF$_ - 0.0416 00870 0 W.0870 $32 S N5 S192 sag - SO SOSK S35 $37 $201 - $201 NM LAM LIGHTING SYSTEM INC. 04779 OBNO 06760 S367 E311 SE52 11.m3' $2.415 _ SO _ S40 $357 $287 $1,W6 $1,048 NIA IMPERIAL PIATING _ 0.1315 00260. 0.02WI $103 E9 $14 Suu2 $alt so $113 $10 $11 $201 _ $201 NIA PRIVATE IABEL LABORATORIES,W. 0.1172 024401 034M _ f90 SBS f127 _�102 5628 N SN 597 f104 S]00 i]W NIA SEKISUI TA INDUSTRIES.INC. 10743 1.98401 1982E $826 E690 __$1.022 22538 S3,662 N $9031 $793 S834 31,52E $2,52E 'NIA SHEPARD BROS.INC. _ _ _ 0,1473 02490 0.134E $113 E871 $70 $270 $3d2 SO __$1241 E99 S57 - S280 $280 NIA CARGILL INC. -I _0,3705 0.7720 01720 $285 S269' SIN S955 $1,197 SO S3111 $300 $328 3948 3948 WA GwO Taw S306.153 f5W7.029 $778852 SID572035 S250.506 310.130,7991 $3011216 $7.359.214 5635.203 $11,005,632 91,374,033 (1)Utilizing Flow Data from FY 06-07 (2)-Tax Credits based on Taxes paid in FY 06-07 (3)-Per Million Gallons (4)Per Thousand Pounds 8 ItemcNumnber ADM08-09 Industrial Rates - Net Cost of Service Methodology Schedule of Estimated Impact on Permit Users Dollar Amount Increase Fi NI YNr 0l Actual ChapN Under Me Gross C NW Sel McMOMI By(1) Pmposa3 FY 03-0 Est.Charge UnN!Me Nat Cast W Service MBMPEPlp97(1) *z tT 57 4 1 k.3 1 E w�tf }m'"G f„ 4 avc il.. "4�#Y•-1'^t" '1� Iri .. ' � II'+�,, S3 ;: 1d[",'.!la.0 !1N57h %* .ID'n[Plbt ATRENICNS I¢M AAGE FOODS TLC B21]289�1,%C 19%0 031C01 3E83$B1'_fiM,188 t2,2>B. S •111 E23B13 E1,113,128 _ _ tl5i J119 7169,983 15% MCP M. v 271 B2,i30. 2.] 0 iNN7 9W1N {1,618 _ _- _ _. ___+ _ ]>B zeal presj.. 7nam1 _.. s3wn9 -_ss]e,s]s mew Sal" fSNW2 13% N.]N, N32S J50l SN1W _- EB26A10, JIB% {00,010 WO1" 13% wMBERYCIANI( DWIDE.INC. __ 49a01 1 1.90W W503f1 51NS16 __ ,_$1041 EN8.139 Mom'. 105g8W 532975 -A1774W;- - T _ 1002817 _ 1N 14% SEVEN4IP BOTANY 40.1N81 BNS5]0. -1.B9E0 Wa2N'- W12A76 S1,N1 SN2.138 WN... 73e1,W5 N1.TW 5959311 - 7849 0W ML 1d% PEPSIC BOTTLING GROUP - I REG 99X3J . .20080 f28,OfBi_.7308,a13 _>)fA4T 3] .CBB f1,B24.. 1Be3SIS WT62H S%5]% _ .-_-INN J>of�lM �WA1? 15% HOUSEF N.A- -� dT0ia0 W63BW 2.8310, WB.182-.,,_ i2B3]W 71�W] F,121.112 WS4). 1321,T39 EWS93, i3W]M __- f�BM $41V 15% AMERIFEC INC. - - - - -- mono, '78983N 2.]910 f19,278 52I4642 _._f1,423. 89.301 51.040 iW1,]01 W1,074 al-5.4k 8 Imes _�T�, $411" 15% N RCpL BEVERAGE 667045 -� 210885� 6522T5:1 IAON f1a9W _ tWeA% __.W% C4.IN Sb; S244,73a S1d4B5, Sz30.584_ _ W11 9f7Y•710. W9,107 14% RTONC REOSPCUILnES -�- W1275-54ez'so 1.MW S1T.N9 S1W980 _vsi Wo7.742 51.002. WN.SW S18AN _f2ISA14 1S _ Ua]pl aDY!] 15% NNOTI•s BERRY FARM FOODB - 13AN] 5�0.72 - 1:WW- S� - E18T 8% _�726 1 z,20]..,. W__041 E109T5 $181,488_ fl 51W.III WB,OTO is% VAN LAW FOOD PRODUCTS.INC. GM13 esl Bt90._ 2oN0 %381 81710N 51,085 f177,4�9 SW9 7170.N7 J'u iW f1NA]0 IWf,1W, f28,318 15% DEAN FOODS CO OF CA.INC.(MILK PLANT) - 3a8302. 40A14W OA110 win MAN. � E133,3]1 E1.6T1 HB3,T01 SIB,BIO, 181A54 RN5 WI S25.Bit 15% U50 - _- ..._ tea%eo": 2911]SO - a3eeo 71]0.4W 88oBU �,..717,_N W1z,]Bi, SBN'- _ 11,B2! siaz.%1 $-it4a :pf5M6, WI,TW ux NOR AL EVEMB DECO.NC.�Z &I.BBBS 32TAW0 1.Ba80 8W,IZ2 -_$113]N $IA14 SIMA0i N.118 NdB,TN N2,1w SIMA S pa] f5T1.•Tri was 16% JAa9 I ONO �-__ 291.1- 21JOW 21.W30. �183A19 77.410 �-11.148 i2f1,S85 % 9 - 5WaT39 $211011 aw. % W5 s1] tt% 3 it IT% CHROMA SYSTEMS PAR�mE 3 12713% 123W40 - 13510 W7720 WW2 �7W 141618 � _- i1W312 81NN2 iN418 - 7W4 519aeH NHy6oB. 13% EXPO DYSINOAND FINIBHRBi INC." - 1179223 -1317320]Bz0 1S2iU E583W -194 15-I]]02„ E108� J1KBW SB3W01 _f�fN0IpA]]2 - WB - S1M,SW f17,377 13% SUNNY DE4GNT CO 25.3W3 2T5B170 1.1520 $18M4 SB5.9E7 � 119,088 E1�48- 5114,118 W1312 i110, 3W4 �320i5 J17,314 15% ME SHIN WAINc -- 155.1 N.272U 2]3B0 S1W,B21-- mN3 SIL4?L $167.311 E1,275 STEINER CORP.DeAAfACO_- -- --- 2ABBN�,. 2N OS30�-- -" _ J1a0.We SI , 5 _ _..911N � -W73.1 _J1?.Iw 11% B35 ODEANF0009CO CFGI01 ManALQ NAN 0.5406 WB491 =61, $111.221, TM $1207 14,2N 5W JI3OW 50.730 In _ tPULMUONE NBA INC 0.22N 1 _ FROI - 19 $107,1225 $1l 114061 $1o1N, $122" V%517 is% 1S1 ] ,711 W1 : 45 A W � $10.139 113,580 15% V ERHAEWER COM ANY __.. 2WWI ]0.8120. a5N0 �7�14� -. . JN _ {WRW _. l 71 _ WIN - 32B.32B E1 _ 3�14 �8 Ill N% .__ -__ AN tAT6 U HABM BAKERY 0.W9B--13438N 0.9ND 4W. $48]O i50.]]3:- 55338__ _ W1NI __.. 7WA9JJ _.i2A98 1t / S12M1 24% PACIFIC OCFAN DYE03GAN0F1NSiNING --- NBWOi 793888 14T10 sW, W78S�1 �. _ f1a,9BC si I62,.. _StOD.1W _... lBJ,1WI __ W1888, .£u f_118,M2 s/8,fD1 12% CLEUOMS FROZEN FOODS INC. -�- 1]1N9' 191 M10 1.03]0 10.141 W85N' CAB, $". M, sT8.8N S110BBI 5]8,481 _ $43B SBBA00 N�,.ti 16% NE RT OIL P _ - ]2A98Y f023010 0.26/0 W5755 W�SS I -it]0 W1AlU 70, 1ATO 780850'' iRiliss-AWS1W W01,9Ea fImn _ 11% OPANGE COUNTY REGISTER - 1 1IA� ]OA04D NN10 $112N itOAN i18,e ,W 7,734 10.1N 72]AW 8123T7j W2 -5/2834 W7AW 31 CITY OFTUSnN WATERSERVICE�1_7TH 8T� 131AW1 001N itA1B0 �1N 812 _ Bi i10 (11,328 101.328 i110.TW --� W J110.T15 M,MB B% I7TINDWTRIES.GNNON W189 20Bi20 117d1, 8170% f0.9b i9`B SW.1 _ 77028', 114 S�BeB. . 810`7% #"Ass J0.018 40% FRESH FOODCONCEfnS _ 103N8 115A750 IA9<D W 918 _ $ 0.024 !BN 518,7]5 f23N�- i4448a _ AN - 549A72 -�� 2 t0.5,]W K1125 19% TAC WEST INC. - - 13AMI 1Q39RI 02110 S10,Oq_W1211 i14f - $51,4bi W, W1AN 810BN - _3®,871 $115 sar 74583 16Y. BECKMAN COULTER INC - - 19A782 183220 1aN40 $10. _-3 W� 811 W4,Bz8, i. 510AN 5118W W�t -ie]St _WB28 58AM 51% SwUx HONEYRSSOCIAnON COdP ..T z2838 1280810 03180 ¢¢1T%"t _�-mi�vl - Sim - 1KM ins,... �M,9/8 1819 -_new "5138 .)W_ _ - us 17% LOS ANGELESTIMES COMMUwi;gTION Lr B.ZD]1 13.40N 33670 _�8.308, NAs - 10 _ 16511` IWO76,.. 411 WAN - W]N > N JSIfB! W.128 81% ANOEUGTFx11LE bERWCE3 - 5239]B:._S�SiN. 45]00 SIgIN._.. $19310� -W-� "I'm S]N nt.M f43AM m "Sim, 11 9MT] nx stuicuesE.INC:(pBq cowUNRAFT111 - 1142Ni 3524%. 13890 58.1M_--912PW� "- yew W1 41 -�•-_}1&2W "Al 14AN fTA. _ 5a13]. 33x CALIFONNIA STRTE UNNER911VAT FULLERrOt7 t114Te1 WBT3oi W-T]W 188,88� i3299>�-_ .9�B W8 si51,3si' "_-�1... f1M361 W3,BT6II - 143 Jf p.00! 4x FAIRWEW ELOPMENTALC - 4B N11 12/N%:-daTtl04 _THAW` N2181. _d8:i86 1N.32p �.. �0l selasll :_ EDAN 71B.57B __.51/ 1121_�1N 8% DYNA911C DETAILS INC. ... VIAW1 WI)50 i18,590- _6t $30: WLWB N]AWI lAs $3.337 J0.7N 9% WORLD WASTE TECHNOLOGIES.001 T 4445(l B15Vo -0,770 "All i]3820 .. i87y WBONI 0I �W,ON. 54155 E3 All WN WAS AM 14% UWMC H08PITAL CORFORAA}ICN .._[ ._ 70ABW ]GANG lgsBw, _ SU517, SW T20 _... $87 NSA,_ Wt ._ W84W, ... saisil-__� � _. 99 eY' ELTO MFATSNOP a2B5BI WW30 1.18W WBp -- fW4% _. 17 S39,p% $1W' W78B W7]t]I 79N _ f'Jy0W 14% NOBEL BIOCAf1E - - - ] 9 OI22o'. 31220 -- P-2 8B4 Sim vu-N�•- -[�,�vu-N---iQ --� - $52 M $47o awx WESTERNYARNGYEIN INC _ 3p TWt! 43MN 0�340 229848--519118 t7d, _ WB.NS - -WN1_�N.N9._. 728A48_ Et>3B2 - 5143 Btf]M� $?BB7 1T% GEOflOW PACIFIC CORPORATION 241NI 181]%' 3A880 f13N' WIN .f1A10.,., t0,W1 S W1W f302T, �]� f0_ N,e79 TIPS GERM COSMETICS UBS INC. ! U.%1T- N.33201 _0 51T2 1W! MileB% 15% (1)Utilizing Flow Data from FY 06-07 (2)-Tax Credits based on Taxes paid in FY 06-07 (3)-Per Million Gallons (4)Per Thousand Pounds 1 Atta hment 2 Item c Number ADM08-00 Industrial Rates - Net Cost of Service Methodology eof Estimated Impact on Permit Users Dollar Amount Increase on Real Yw 07J)B Aftal CM s UMerBa Calais Con W SeMoe MONodolM(1) ftMsea FY 08,09 En CI Mes UMOr Ne NId ConeI SONI Wthdol 1) ,1w r _. . + ] 7{ u1 ' YA^f$i"�mliu lly F( 'IIE rv}'v;�ar Idl ¢ Irk' !' '.fit' by I� °`' -:(I Tf INU_ a'�1�+�%" .�hdI'll _ __ ,,,,_ .I t.. '.INI s4p4LW�lr;1 _s �: r # .9 a.1 a�yf "1 9mLEtl9c AL N � " r9t 651 LepO p1 _ i18tr uAtr, +alp 1 _ 113 01 _�I,p1 2BS% Gql AER09PRCETMNSPARE±ICYSYssi - - 18 niw:-� 6.m10� 4Atp S151pj Stem 31UOC- 19.111 Am' " I1 S.rB5 -" ilep5 " 7pe St'IOB {30A1t 114.628 m% KCAELECTRONICB we umol-6proi iisJo sloaal s+nl dare 12Aie bro9 -- s+0 Bs8 f+Are - fpr {lasm $4. 17x IRWNE RANCN WaT6i DI911eCT-0.A19 80.p00 1A10 omlo seatle- s3.a s1,352 9% GOOOWIN COMPANY 1 r5A2m OSep sI ,_ SmAr2 __T16o .108 i1p_ ,p - S19M "_ TIT "- b2 1311. {duel. ux IILn.RH INEEL�CIRONR±NC. ....._ - w JJ 21p OBep ' 14-041 ._1.18.,8a 7e1 81Ae7 ]±0.mo 01e71 _ L]AT - _.. S�2M1.i tg{M goes 22% J0191ATHOMAB ) B" 0�81 pABm oM10_ fiI i0 s28s�0 T" 619 . _ p03o .{m_,OW -�W� p+ pMY ux TTMTECHNOLOGI VI -- 4ZO2pl " 19F4p1 IB $32 tI1B 2 N1.+ - � p0 tter8 SaAb 9% RROWHEAe PFOwCiS CORPORATION �.pB1._. repro rei1V r1B1 ._ m�p�Il 11y 11r,210 sB�Yp6_ /,Sp - i7 p2. -{�8 r00 - + - 1s 9p p,W 2B% GEORGE WE NBAKEWE9 INC. Wm- 199rp 121p Atr' " $113o1 -W" em,p8 IBI {30,Op iaAp SiB 9Br pB p.p{ 1e% EIN oj�-E LT MPANY1GENE Ai�FACI ^� - 83 ppp Bd.1110 "FBenet imA1e W.12 p1,25o Item seS.mt szB aB. {_aJpee M. n3, Ss,s26 az GOGLANWI 9ANERIEs .. -- BA6f0 ._ ppp 101e60 pt sm Mt >�6 spa -_ _ p112 fz3AO8 4Aer W311B pAa 12% LeNuNIFOPA4sIFRYco INc..__ � _ pT1W OC210 + il]1B3 "tip--�20.115 Z-0 s29Ap $17,162 _S1-A 7294 itt.eB1 f3.W6 12% ALCOa�LFA9TPNERs INC._. �, fry: 19A3p1 19p 1 ]B1 _p�OtJ s3s-111 s1 �_ ssSap sm rTif .. }r,80< eel. syaei 10% pRNHILL RUBBER CO ... - 3`315 r1Bro r+8r0 e1i S2 J9] -'s{.- Ae6 �12Y _ _._ s2,BB9 S2.p3 "tJ we' i&rBr S{1s1 ezx MICi INTEr3RPTEe PROwCTB 49.B1m T10J0 1.WI11 te.10• -___iSm _.WAB7, i1p lei _ sNB18 -- m pB p,]te +0% ¢ ATE 0 INC _- 23813' . 50 $S OAS 8- 31 + ' "_s10.9ad -" itl0 52i.M, Sm,M Stan ---Will iz3e ix +ex MHO¢ECIRO CAl1FORNNN L�0 Imle " atilm.-O.BTW 1,201 a S1,p2, s3J.51W.i $ 87 - ip _. �m 300. 1191 _ !]8510 faMe +O% . . -t ; - " zx.on wl1 W s+3i2 izai>a _ �Bs _L�/L "Me tsx MWN PoOO FROOUCl9 WG 3Too B3ABp� 2A1b $21p, IN _ s YIN ._ 522M � s2Re6T i1Am rp ss.2{B 13% VEO FRESH FARMS LLC -1 aerp' m70op 2.9. 780 A21, 50.W1 f11 pow 510270 � / 818 43141 m% WIN NC9� ap.1 ] 111Bp +Tr>� 9)1. i3,BM i-BOs fJ7181 5852 _ eis a20Ae+ - aa482 -1-rp" p+ i+1w lax PLACENTA-U M08PITi1L - ...."� 12p9'�-2r Mp zr.Omrlp i�pAe1e21� pd+r it-a1p pJ50] 002 ifOB12 �$10 ate eiie04 " HA1t 2% WESTERN AIEUM.AL CB�+f.RANAII f02131 z�1 mW z1.2p70 pl �110i it. In 8eD sz pz - -ii�SBY SB pr 1s DIS DS WATERS OF aM ICAO ir.®BI ].16ro + + tam Emrii m " T21 531 m+ $l a8t {eel ¢rY- B% _ t-RLI LSO INT NAnONAL INC, eT8p1 11 pm oAa10 }1A15 tt s]0 ke t1e S9B, ES] t �d010 �S$8.1% tt�r{2 12% HARRYSDYE3WA9HI17c --- --25. 0e0 9401) 515.7% �r,w "Sf1J Sm.pe i1Bi f W itr]4il _ i8+p i1741 -_ ¢.sei +2% aFXI3UI7A INUUSTIUM INC "- 1Arp 195p IApe moo' -i1 sae M802 a OJ _gip .ism, i51� _IDS BH. NIA suNCLIPSE,IW.1CORRUWro- RP rl- -t "�_plei 2111� 1.1Bp - i6 H _i01Y) s+o]Oi $1 zze _ /rs THY r91 .,,_pp �11rSi-r Nr,B1! nx DUCOMMUNAEROBIAUCIVREB TNN -� 2BIm a%ml tA/t0 s2,0�1' i1�, i�i -"�6100 $211A_ 000221 _ M3 ,.._ -�6.181 i_{NO p% aANMINACOFF'11RATIw LWRWAIT -"~" 1T tdr taAr10 32{p st7,ma� S9Ap 11 slow $374_ S+B.p1 StV�1 waBz ipt �m rp S{- tl% DOSCUAROA F HOREREBA3.0 _j v i 20.3Bm OA280 B122B -gip4o .. 15 31612r $121_ NS.pe �9Wi p70 -611i tlrMe i].on 13% FROH-WN-MOMS INc _ I3.X --31B3to 0.88811 s10, 5-- crow SIB BSi s0 s+B,e3+ eli s_3 __pm _ .9�m B I TECHNOLOGIES INC. rAB9J - 32r40 1BIiC iS.B03 7i1�3 1 ir.7 f+S13_. i82M TB tm -i196i et,p1 32% TAYION-DUNN NI/FA-'FURING COLIPANY --I 113Br� 21p0' 2S8]O SB74 "" 8�55 1. 1 S2�ep- 42015 5 0 I -- $j' "�-- -p,M p.001 2m% MAHEw GEN�MLHOa-151M - + 6IGN 1rwm: tr02m iB2Tr E59nI 1 sil ISB $1011 _SO.ebZl Pact: $7,me. {1Aee I'm 90IhJ4 ACCAPORA�REDNILL)_ ITAp1. IrAMO Opm per." p98.1 - 1 - QOrr <. s16.ear 53r pBp 4I - 18 li 41As+ 12% 8 /� - 143BOi_ oM 51211 ".--- F1L _ 13.oeB $12}p s133e1 111 "" 3. _.. 1ir+p 41,810 1'J% WARKUN0 WWIIN FACTURING.WC. MAdm' - Jpro1 34110 st9178 i1Am-iT.� 518.2N .1i7S1 - 519p0 st6 em I{1 Bd 2 . .. ii M,a11i 10% IXPEDIa MEOW LLC - apM 208p 206p i]Op __{rts 1A1J_ ,ml - p2p -fB73 41702 60 93% _ - _ n1 _ to eol - r + --� 41.60 ax I Ps CH147ERC rpm 82Be0 3.p10 �1 32 t1T 1 W2 1 _ "-- me Ii,s , mm _ s+flz ax KODAK PROCESSING LABS _ 78T2I'__ 2012p 215+U s8.ep', rAW .. 5111 1 ited pAM .. ;zAp -- sp iie st Of1 31% OS _ - _ part ._s2 st0 - 1 p3 i/ 31,551 11% 531ETEIk Co O�LIMTED WATPR DLIS-fA1Cf rt -r- j ... �p pj0 szBrim2.. -y `�` 10 �� - 11+ lisp �3Ara t� ii� s+s]8 lax WESTANANEIMM CAL_ _ __ B1p 1J.Brm AT.87m 519.tp ina loo ip TIQN U PAIAIA INTERC MUpIY XOSFTAL 2pm 61140 aB140 Dro S1Api i2A25 �iB.i4T 1Bi31 ;w - 50,e06 a a, t1y +0.7e0 sl sii 1+x .... ,y f/A1p _ {1e,100 st 219 it $11414 _4IA" III TTM Clwa IESIN 1a9911, _ 3.74M Ar1Ye f14,329 - $1.ap._. 111 t SMI- FIFEM.._V1617 .- 1.19r. -st-69] Sn.m. .. _ + f' ORS SENSORS aTARGETINb SYSTEMS "-fi"....-3.1331 -3.ta+o- eM.- --ion 1 -'- - 1 (1)Utilizing Flew Data from FY 06-07 (2)-Tax Credits based on Taxes paid in FY 08-07 (3)-Per Million Gallons (4)Per Thousand Pounds 2 Attachment 2 Item ADMO"9 Industrial Rates - Net Cost of Service Methodology Schedule of Estimated Impact on Permit Users Dollar Amount Increase Flual VealO]4M Ac1uMC eeUMar Me Gmi9Cw1 or50Mce McN00ol YIt) PAp94ae%060B FAC Un "NM CPNat I.Me,Me WYM _ _ .]838. )OTOi_9.6010 f2Y31., - 52_1 33.m MAN, _. --._ _-elE .6t) W L.+]6 8C13 1(850N FUVORS.INC. - 1.1582 -1653-10, O.1sM m _P.M $103 M 1___.- M21 saS4 son; - -3� __-_-=tl4= -._.-F_M t+M 23% NI%SON METAL Ml� , . y 20.12p1' 1.9920' ITSW- s+SAW fib s810 s1)Ao�6L NI f1/,001 $t),168 1620 =I _�51 f1'4te 8X AIN INDUSTRIES COMPANY,APCC COMPANY -.. I 1A312. B1BM &IND $3.62] 851. -Sa�]I +0.1; 44) � +,61)._ fMt! W.]Ot� _ 3],2n -_A1,W _.}f0,Os1. St.<Ja 17% AgTRTC NATINGa METAL RNIB!@IOING 2M10_tA M,SN_.__ 1.OM1. .._ $849 --srB4sr�� Sno. p.181 s]J23 SIAM _. , _. +M S� 16% w METALS NO.R __1_ atBta_ B W40. _ 1T�0 s].1Bo, J]12f SfiK HAeB~-_ fie,'_ S0�?1G ... i3.N1� .._43�89._ -... s91-.._-. pAOB. S1,]BB 23% THC O.C.INC OBSWNOREDIWe - i /.5565. BORW s. _ -1 A1..i49, i - 347w s1+yq_, Non tl,)31 tlABt j],i20.. tl,6ea S_ 1ty1K s1�si! 14% 15-mug-m-CHNOLOGRIES.IN . 1.7511. 112850 O.w10 S],8531 �73,]1�8� AV9 0.310 $]10:_ Sam poBS, s8106 sZlr _ _H N.SM 1!% RID ON ELECTr20WC5R .. ti 1 M 9A7w OAOie itAw: �9�88 4 4 _Ti,9]8 gym]' K112 $1318 _ �316! �.tle _ ri'm U% NAGN-E1+CMtT CORPORAT .... 1.21M. 6-0740 1.1eB0� fWB. T2A43I fWB -�A6) 111-- pAN 5102] fW - fIF3 55% a�ER1Z�-CSMPANY BLDG. _. -� ._ _._2+7BB 262)01 J.12r0 f+i7B_ T _.ai -' . _ _�. . t,611 - __ .BBO S4A27 i13B7'-, PA10 � _1 - I.tl1 $uit, 39% CULLIGAN WATER CONDRIDNINO 10M1) - aA- QUB6U 511,658 s,63 $45 _S12148 WN sitsis wA51, s+67 $37. - 11jus f113s7 11% CNAP7MNMEWCALcENIER ._.. 6.3001.._ 1]3p0. 1d3430 sails, f4.64+ - tl953 - --- - ---r - i,astl sUsi_ 7ison u.2ii, 4s,3a1 fses __ f $l.sio ex AMCORSUNCLIPSEINc... __ . ...-- 11 `- 34Np t.ie2n 5875, S11tl -.5916 _>uAIO N.Zll. $1,?_ s9tl; 1074, 04 $yW, Nate 75% GERAROMORNOiwRN6LLOpESLLE ..- 33.uty._ .attw o.TJ sw s1'= -S26s s].MB Sys _ USES 12602 - Wl 3N8. _� N,7N ux CALIF CONSIRIDATEO wA�ER PuftlFlG l�ai t_ 1.2860 Otz40 31023] - s447 S55 S10.i45 Sm sIOA?s �ttn; �- 14 - - W N1.7S1 }f.2m tm UNIVERSAL ALLOY CORD - ._ 195w - aOBw <AMO 498 St eta, t1e _ A]f 1 n_ $3.7lt A91 - 1 1 e1'72� N,ae. ax PWMATDt INDusTNES INc ._._ 03 TOW 0.a= Sit% s1,W M.107 tlN._ W43 �?A22 - ,._Nt,7 a>n- __i9+ � 14% PROGRE59NEM INO _ .. 13M8j-- 1.XM�. .13sN1 NM2' tlMl _._ S050 _S21)1 i11w! SM1 - SI M Stl9 sage -tliO HAW tN% PREC610N RE1i0NICE CALIFORRIA tSF>AI N _ _ 9AOtl 7A]90 44100, f27n s2,e5011 ppM $7519 sm " MAM___ tlASt SiMe ___ � +B% GILL IN 0.3705 a-7110 - 0.7720 S2B5 - - T1� 3 M �- SS11 SON, _sm � $1 CROCNETT CONTANERCORi - DA212 - 9A1M -7.BB40 5831 - tl1>B - - 7791; SS-W _ _�680 - _402- _ 398) 11s�5�l, --Sl 1n 34% PIp1EER CIRCUr19 9.9148 7NB0 3.W50 i-Q-1 _ 52tl0_ 51 s9, ideas U41 _ 611A11 -�.T`91, DAM �17W S1].W _ 1N f0% LOs AIANITD.9 MEDICALCB41EIe,INC _. , i9tl32 -- 4,5610 41ABt0 31"1 SMAW, Stttl3 i51.OM1 S14M 649 --�s,7s0-- N�801 -itltlB _.__381M1 NAM 3% CHR-HE_TEC-(IOT 15.85'AI -o-wee'_ $1,289 - 35.W sne._7�e� st,�� sale__. star _sex6 i15 3i.ie� NAa nz _._ N204 S11AQ N. -..fW-M $n n AM TB J1]A141 p 170 In LAM LIOHnNGH�R91 M�PC•1 - o�� oIM I0.e7B0 tl331 i1 11 �__ 5s1B.o211 �s tlt29 Nsn s/4te _ sPASS 7.Hs $I.M 19% W917TRONICm ,am! IBSM O.2Bw M76e, 1 1Y s10,N1 i0y tW 1-{y_-0115� Sea t.2O -Q,OW Ntoi nz _ _ nn 1 19,62s stn�ee _ �i - st21 in,nl stow lox 51.10 wEr1o4W1ED$ER COMPANYAl2 +. _ 2B7]0 N,311 �_ i4 N FA F FIECTRONICS NPB CORPOMTION 1 Ta58 ]� a93i0 s.S72, it�4 381�] i11.N1 � � � _ � 31,W f1.04fi WA AS-MCH ENOINEERED PRODUCTSSIL' 121928, _ J4wD +.i810 31/ 510245 {t,]tl - AIM N2.ir7 MIND B% s246, 36tlU1.1190 N.1n, NA3]� .. 7981 79ASBi f-S'16- 1M, _. st 1 ) ie _ - 287 S1.w0 45% _. ._-- -_.--- CATALINACYLINDERSADIV.OFAPP 4.1378. 1 ._ 916 ..._..._SM 51,2)4 feK_ W7 _ 3aM N.005 2B% �. - .. tlyetl ..__ MTAAI Ei�INC.IY! _ O.iN48 1.)W. 1.d90' _.-_3Y14. - SBO�- f2190 N88.. N.1N Si@ _ 3WM9� w� +91 -_ BBB . e3R BODYCOTE TIIEp74AL PROCESSNU L. 50w1�- 12750 -tZRO - ifw3 S44J f881 _ 13.416 SM t2pi -32,629 _� Isti _ SSX4 sm 36% TAORMINA INDUSTRIES LLCM 23110' a8100 030N ftTM NAM N - SlIss 5588 72iii _ TUA St.tlS _ _ $I faetl _�Stl 34X ALL METALS OCES5ING O.GW )A7fi- 0.5W 1 601 1680 -TT03- TA7B tli] 7711te - 7 N7 _L In AMEWCAN aRDUIT TECHNOLOOYINC - aWw._- 52� osw6+�J,. eZ2Y1 _. 8 0! 5 _ se150 _- $41 4s-_ 1 1�04_ ��-- In EMBEEINC.i2 --- atl81' )12401 O1p0 Mw0 $2478 SUP $ 461 827 tlAn 3) 15 _ S1s 1 M In LAMB MANO-S UFA RWG -_ 351a11 )1540. f4w. 3' - G.9w - OM- _i w N.O11' SatlS - 7I IN - I S itl) 11% SOMcOAS CIRCVRStl 2e004- 122110 OA3w 3'2+�F6'�-- 1M SB- R]3��SSj- s4af __ 52,Tp�.. ._ Sw ._.Q, a - . 7M9 13% COASTLINE METAL RNSHWG CORP T.7We _ 225w. +.]B00 5A84, 1028 M iT.702 5989_ N.2,2BI7 -__ NCI, 51,+82 mrB Y,>r0 SNI 12% REAIEOY EHG117oNM 8F�1 -. 1 B496s 1B.16w oxewL _ ss.wo -- sJ3 ___��-� taw4 yfli -�;- szi- _it, off! - 14% CAL-AURUM INDUS ESI INC. -._ 7J040i.... 2J2BOj OAHO 76S s810 _.._2442. 6).2wi-5j-jl OM _ 5ar6j, s10 - _'liBt____ dAN �g6W4N�2 12% LIMN TERN OPEMTWGINC - . __ -- 7A2s2__ 0.11401_ 0.11N)_ _ MA'5'__.. fW __f�_.._ sei141_68l 8� _ _. _ 6�A76... - --W- -mow _--. $611 14% HAMRTON IMTEWRC4 ----- -_- 3.w75 112800, 2.5]My S2.]59: E4970 S1A22 Mw _ S1N~- 50321 f2AlB; _-_ {5,)08 sum.. iM __SMM 10% O C.ALPINNEIICS ING a6B61 910MI 0.tl70 f4A2%' _ 52,12< 11 ._-_ AS0 161' M,w6 Q,BN, 33�W� -.._ I_µ- itl1 12% IDEAL ANODIZINOINC. - " -- - 1' 0)1w 0. - -]wisms 13% (1)UtiliTing Flow Data from FY 06-07 (2)-Tax Credits based on Taxes paid in FY 013-07 (3)-Per Million Gallons (4)Per Thousand Pounds 3 ttachment 2 Item NumberADMOB-gg Industrial Rates - Net Cost of Service Methodology Schedule of Estimated Impact on Permit Users Dollar Amount Increase Fl 1 Year 074*AOMM GugBs Utter NS Gro Cost of Seim McOwd (1) Prow ed FYOBOB ESL GRriotUnaertlR NM Co al o13eMU McM940b9Y(1 g 1 1� `a 4yryPA�'^ v� .i' F- i' L'I� 1 fNR.,! V T ° "-• A" 4'�'r n. '•3^M' f .9V �"1 a ANOMILEM.OBA OANCOMETAL SURFACpAG 73M1. 21 _ Ob1]II fB.BBB; 1BS SZNig16) fB l&1 !8! _ f230 t),Z)0 CMS 0% .. _. ._ i1S1 .j1fB M.ON1 10%OMW METAL FlNO3WNG INC. _ BBOY-. ONro _-Ob]90 f181<, _ 12B1 _ i0.1] ie,W six�B M 18124 OIRTECH INC. __�_ 1A151 4.71ro 11W0 $6 _ Simi - IB09 i7A42 $1)x` {),IBB_ - Nask pAN ._ BAN_ µfp �f01 11 CARAN PRECI91_ON N00lEEROIdTI ....-.�__ OAWy.� 1 $537I Net -�780- �1,B02 $813 -- !W9 $97 -...�NI 1B }1.7A jiN 81% SElAICOA SEMICONDUCTORS "in _ eA230��.2W p.545 aa. �B � s�,1H s_+�� 33879 - - -W -��r8 -1 11% CWTOL1N ORANOEIMEGMTBD WASTE MGT 1035/2� _ 014fi0 OW 0 �B ���I i)�t 373 MN _ 1�21 - 1,3M B1W 14% _ _ _ 1-..-�. --- Sm W $6712 t11B St35 .. ._.�WAss f1�1 10% ), ._ ._ _r SWt-- M,W i44M 17i4� ._.3.73 -__ _ 14% BRISTOL INOUSTMES - -_ 2M13-- 1 W50 4.3000 B22 41 _Mls ,T2 f24M 1)41. it BZ/ _ �/R. 14% ORANGE COUNTY METAL P0.0CE931NG �- 1 - 44.2BW am, - MM7 M04I f1N �' $3,01B f8701. _.- StM M W 8% J -L PLEGELOILCONPANY BLATTNER ANA 2207e- 0a5ro 0.0510 M]N_ 510 - .B1B _ 1320 Simi S21 sign ON SM CRE3TCOATING MC - _ i_3583. 12040 1.11W i1,046 _ $1111 W) --- -- - _ i2,743 fW5 f2/M It tu, _._ WB, __ 1.. _5195 3Y,4 PRIME HEALI+If.ARE HB LLC _ 115)2) 24.1280 BLI- 78,W3,_ _ xB2 _ 12��SSii1 Sp.-M., saw, _f21.37B W76, __ 5%woo SIOA51 SI_D•NB _ SIB 3% JELLCO CONTAINER INC. --_ 0.7080- 2A3W- &SI]0 SSN 15 _ 4M24 S1,B84 Safi, ft3n Sew i1,051,_ MIS. AM sm 9% WA9TE MANAO_FIAENTOF OIUNGETMNSFEN--- 33�0�- -SA2'!0 M18•__ -I11.Mw.----1�2f S2.442 uv. 11,BW S1�Ip+ _- itA24 _.�Ml _ $In SIM CITYOFANAHEIM PUBLICUTLLI DE . -- 101240 0A910._ 0A020 i7.702 M2 _�49 -i1AeI Se i7,981 39,507; ->i99 - SS_S�,WW_ Sttl 0% AMERIMAX 9URUINO PROWC151NG ----- lots O7W0 . 03490 SM - �' � f12d =1211 _ NIT- �sm SM, MOS M04 N3M, sm 119% EATON AEMWP_ACE LLC _ - --- 1.8810._ 2]B20 -_2.1E30 s138B -__ Z700 1107 fad �W,_ i2,501 - s1�3BB. ... W12 -.._3003 Yyl sm 21% PAGFlC NffATERNCONTAINEp _-- OB9B2� 21840 1.a100 MSB.. .- 3/35 511� W0, f1,M2 AM _ 5V2 - --f3BB _3},202 _-We M% ELECTRONCC PRE ON BPECUL 91283'. 0470- 0.� M2N` Si44f -_ 5212 - 11-m 36.N1 Sam MM _{1]1. VIC _ W. 10% AIRINDUSTWESCOMPANY-APCCCUMPANI' 0A133 INN 0.8430 SK9 f5]N-- 7 1 - 1 fB11 not $431 --� f8 _ S101 01 7" TXOMPSON ENERGY RE9WRC LLC 1 _ SAB1 t.. _ own omen MBM_- S1%9 _._... _-AW � 9% ._,-ice.. _ TIf 30'_- iE1B2 M31B f�01 1 - Sl CONTINUOUS COATWOCORPORAfIW! 3.3422 ONE . O.WO S25BB1 S302 _-_5412 M.3D -�415�_ iim _ . 32AM 5318. -_ ALLOY DIE CASTING CO. _-- -- 1gf).. 1MW 0.0010 S13391 m . _ _M17_� _!�W M83 M•W 31.351. S]B0. .._ fW � XANSONLORAN CO.M. - -. -- 0.w e'- SA210- 0.191 14M S1.W - �- 188 __ 363E - li4M M% IWDIMNN WATEr2CONU111014 B INc S3BN-~-2130 03-1N0- 74: 114.. __-�,B�a - 111 M,BM VA49 W ._ WI __.f1,fY/ _tpl e% WLIA PARKPARK OnCIUNDS I13501 __ 70015�. 131ro1 o1 M 1x ip3. -' E1I -- � �f--�,4N . TB,4N - 5108 -.IN _.31001 ._-8�01. AVIATIONEOUIPMENTINC. 04M1,_. 04W0 OAW Mt3 SIN---- 7 _ IS�Si N --- - 71�— � -_ fn3 S9r 459Y. ANANElu OL1RUSION do.INC. _ - ON23, 131M, - 1.D1/0 5508 7437: _ - 1 WI_ 1 W7 SS25 iW � fiN N% ALUMPACIRCIAUn STNAPINO _- D.MM tA40a O.Tb SUS - la MIS. - wn --- "is.. Site - M12 sm 17M CnY FANAME WAIEA BA9ro 0110 -a]NO W.M log- - 1y 56.�� W. �402 --- RBW - $0 -- $113 80 Sul B% BA2-MUSTONCO _y 2MIS title, asm $1738; SNO -143e pAN MTII_ -. SIAW _ sm _3� We 22% NAXEIM TRUCK DEPOT B2 BW WASH 00189 1]9W 1]MO M)a 5447 f1,5� -- - � Sets .4�N' M,A7t GRTEL ELECTRONICS INC. CWT 4.317 ,-6.w S�A01 -- IWe M.964 �.._ - ".IN -. MM4 M10 IS IO% €.xCELLOCIRCU ND calls 4AN0 t9940 - 0.2]W >i31N - m MA6f -SIM TIFF MA9 - Sro7 -. 1w SI,i1B, 11521) 14% METAL PONTJEF PROOIWTY AWJIEI�A _-- I11BG- 122M O "! '__... In Wr uro _�.ess,F— { 11M _-_ —.. -.emu ry.,Ta tnx Nx T' T sIl ACETNE PIATWKOPMD A781B 95790 0:�31 d 31W_ S12M 5142 iS.ON ON M M-�_ -M ff1B 4% .I OAN_ 1.2140 0)3W 7337 119 __ N moo SSM _ _ _ MM _ �3lpMI/9�� SN1 STATEK CORPOIUTION a2 - - aW7 t W20 0a1W 620 553] �2N_ 1362 Se7 t WM7 - lo- 1�7, --..._..I1 h% DTWATERMAN B.TI)81_ 0190. 0.Ism, _ .B25. . . SH MB. NAM $10,___ M1 _._ _ __ sm 81 SMtl .._. 0% DATA EIECTRONICSERWCES S4C. 3AT1._ x34W 0 10 Rom_ Mt4 _ SxW _ 34,0I3 Mtl SO 13_,3/5 - M5 1N WH 34M 11% -1-_ * „� -_3112 i3.490_-EI27 7W - 1, I - --gIM 3Y] 14% ULTM-PURE METAL FIWSHIN0.ING �- I3en Oz13O 0.z1N 574 I j M'no - E1,M8 Mus ---11A5e'"--�S,w _ 429 ux 6FNEDY CIRCdR�IHEM1 CORMS a3429, U.om - omio sm Sly: On 316 MM' M339 M2M _. �pt .,_ESN 19% GRCURACCUS INC _ OAa2B 84720 0]230 SNe 52351 _S1IB .12] f80 H.INC 1)__� p WO 2N40 134t --_ 28 Eli.2xv]3 -�561 3401 HARBOR TRUCK 90GE9INC -� _ ISW _tdl�_ M77 i8:1/ sm -�f Al-4 12 1 �e20 - Ml]' - fS]a _ 1,91r _ $413 in WERE roRculION ORAPNIC9 3A425' B8110 0AI40 SZ8/ 1 N) , 3zN �3/8 i173� 141 MN _. i2.ON- _-�W] �2,SSa_ MOB. 1BY. S4AB1 22.Bt8 51A22; _ 74a 94M4 ON 8% G n5 roM� NW. 1800. - - 711 E300 _- -_iM) SM (1)Utilizing Flow Data from FY 06-07 (2)-Tax Credits based on Taxes paid in FY 06-07 (3)-Per Mllllon Gallons (4)Per Thousand Pounds 4 hment 2 ItemcNumber ADM08-09 Industrial Rates - Net Cost of Service Methodology Schedule of Estimated Impact on Permit Users Dollar Amount Increase Rrolydra]aa A4Nu uPSMo%DD1M emmsMM4.0 + PrMmE3L 41 WMer m4 NNcm1 Pl5ervke Amuoml I) Its IHTEC FRODUCT6 IN 2AN01 0_lNO 0.43M , 16W ,W55 U27111a 50111 L SIM 1,731 5282 1N M 21% ALUMINUM FORGE-DN.OFALUM.MEGSIGN 3.11N1 3.15N 1.400 W i7N iW 4 itle NW7 W iNB WI. Wit 10% SOUTH COAST WATER 2.2N8 0.14N OAWO f1.7M _ f0 $1AB7 $219 MASS 31,919 1 W,OMI WNI 23% EMBEE INC.N 4.N34 _ 1.2 OANO W-01 --fBn f/5Bl ".an fE] N SEA1B I 76 fI,BBBI N)6 8% SOUTH COAST h CORPORATION 1.7N21 0.1" 0.000 tA73 SO, 51 an 41137 it NJ SO 31= NN u% SOUMCOASTCOGURSN 3.51M N _ ,703 I 1.0531)1 0.33 S3,4P51 Sol3W I 1N W S385 11% JS H DEBILAIRING INC.0 1.3807 5.150 O.N30 tm 1. 'IMI 9.010 727 N2 11N 52�1N f NI NN 12% ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC. 0.880 20001 2.ttat Sm 1 $2A77 N8 NW' 851 - NW 1T% FT AST QUAWYS ,INC. ---_23SW 1.Net 04231 ft so N4 7],SM SN 73 Slog Rfr__ 482 St. II INS 14% PRECISION ANODWNG AND P IINO D.N13. 1.Op10, 1.W4p NTO---- 3N 1W 90 SN41.... ... '7WII -$WE Slaal f3M ]7% ACCU W ClaCUM ENGINEERING Vital 5.0501 OASMI B0f 31.TN SIN $3 I S S%m an TiI 48 =7 11% MO LINE CIRCUn]S TECHNOLOOY WC. 1.NN 2.12001 0.19N f112B SN7 102 51.B0 1 I +AN it 1 N 1 tN i323 IBIS BASIC ELECni0NIC5INC. D9181 2.28NI 0.33N 3208 ___„_ 177 i1.174 t] 0 7278(.,__ IN fl M 34% CUiB51CMn INC 0.0+3 O.NM 0.34M f48S 120 1BO� BB W0 S00 1M 1n N18 WN BS% STAINLESS MIC OUBH S9aW --_ 1.WM Omw $17113 $521 7158 NI -- $10 fN S1bN1. tI7 NtT 13% OEMINIINOU51NESINO 3A401 0.T820 OAM S 747 NO W. 1 72 NOm, N12 W73Al"M 017 9% 1116IIN HOSPII' MO NEWCAL CENTEN 5.N14 11.1370 11.13M 641N- 74 BM f13.7B1 t NNBI 1 M, SStd 2% PAitM10UM015t MAl81FAC1UROIG,INC. 0.2837I _ 0]B30 0.1080 f101 Nt S1W S3W _ SN7 NN 22] if05, SN 10 ]01% ANODYNE RJG 3.1110 _.O.6B9U OABN W.SN_5310 AN 7W W,]WI W73 sm 73N im ONANOECOUNIY PUTND CQ.INC. ].8051 2.OBB0 (LAIN UA17 578u � M23 MXI $10 + W i $30 B% IN6ANOPT 1.B3M 0.13NI SBN N 11 i1.3]91�.10. it1T1 iN2 73] 7: :MN 28XRBCTRANSPORTDYN.AMICBCORP, 1.31N 2.774E 270001 1.016 NN 1 7 S3 ISM 51.1D0 SIAN 1147 10% BLACNOXIDEINDUSTRIESINC. 3.]7B7 U.NN 0. M B87 SIN IHM; ,B4i i27M A36 i1N RANI NM 11% PLANATE LABEL LABORATON6 INC. - M1172 0.24NI 0.24N SNI 1 - S30 I N i .1 61M I Woo NA ADVANCE TECH NATND INC.01.260 0.40N 0.Wi 11 - 1u Sits- S1211 =7-_..SIAN Stott sM 1 f2N 29% MID METAL RNI514I146 2o0N 3.0710 OAOIO 51.1137 $I.M SAW 8 IHA81 SI= SIN NiN 72N it% MURRIETTACIRCURS INC. 1.N77 1.13N 0.33N 1 12 S3N $117 ,OM $125 N. f1AN tN W2N i5B2 Is% AME MFICSPAC INC. 1.3N1 2.80U 211230 St 1 SBN In 411 WAN 19 110 $1.19B__- 1.1N IAN AM W1� - 0% ANAHEIMPIATINGSPOLISHNGI . 22531 IAS10 0.570 i1 W.4p2 1 4 1N2 - _ SM N!� SbB 13% NEUIr10NIC AMI NG,iIh0 71 NO - - ---1.1227 O.ONO O.ONO 35&11 $N SIB 39,15 12 NN $94.11 "M SB% TOOT COMP,INC. z7MI 0.6530 U.NN AB1 Nall S290 SIR WAS W.2751 $2011 am, JI SWS 12% SHEPANIBROS.ITIC 0.+4]3 03N0 0.13N: 113 T SN f2T0 1N NNI IlBO NA LINGO INOUSTNES INC. ISIM IA O.D550, 71471 W,OMn 1230 St 41 W I W! 16% CUSTOM ENAM9ERS INC. 1.N4+ 1A100 0.37W1 S1AN_- fMt _ S1N1 S18N -- S18! W 51.197 SN3 IBI "Al W. 1. A WlftON ELECTRONICS. 1.70M OA5l0 0.2N01 I Bt SeTee- IN I 11781 - $113 - W SIAID S]N_Sf! __..___...N'it" . NN IBIS BMSSTECH INC.112 1.0585 O.1B50 O.+BN f00 NB it 3168 I BN S7B 5!3 St3W Sul N% SOUIHCCASTCIRCUI13.0TC. 1.?Ml 4.O/NI Main S0211 1N5 Sim W.4111 SOI SIX9 51.007 51,5151 NN 748 NM tt% A ROSERVICE _______ 0.201110I OANO D.40NI Sim 151 ia SN7 W4 Inn 5173 1N M9i T ILINEnECHNOLOGYINC. 120511 D.3720 _OANDI_ 1M f12B f48 S= NN 177 P49 i33 --URI Wit MIS NELCO PRODUCTS,INC. 2A07 5.SOW 5]OW. 1A18! 151 f271 .4N $=I _� 1 ON i2.211 RN 0% ELECTRON FIATNG 01wF 1.7 OABSp p.N40' S1.1MI __ f1, 155' .444 St- �- 234 NN St WW In SE6MAG PLAIING 0A075 0.1710 0.1710 N86, W f1B3' 7W l0 NM $21 - M% NU-TEC POWDER COATNG p.423B O.3K10_ p.15M _ it E09 N12 W21 WSB 13 ilt f l 44 TB% qIY OFHUNTNOTON BEACH RRE OBPARTAFI/T 2.BW 0.9n0 OAON S2.ON 32N WN N.OM 39' M- - - I sw 0% EMBEEINC.N 32TN 0.7p+0 0A3t0 II 1 SSTB N 52.370 70 W 522281 it SI ,,,_ 10% LACE'CUSTOM LINENS 1.78MI 1.B0N DASIUI 4 111 1N .10/ SN NB 1,4N _ SN1 SIN fi2/B fW0 12% Cn`(OFTUSnN,WATERSE CEWIH . 3047B UM30 DMID 1 11 11 N I 0 W.5811 S+ 0 NS W3 0% BNDGEMMIt CORPORATON I O.NNI O.NN O.axe N3BI SO 1N SSNI N% RYOCEPA TYCOM CORPORATON 2.BBNI ZONE) 2A0]O 1 1 ] N.7N 1'7 NN3 W.N71 E1.1NI 1220 NBN 6% (1)Utilizing Flow Data from FY 08-07 (2)-Tax Credits based on Taxes paid in FY 06-07 (3)-Per Million Gallons (4)Per Thousand Pounds 5 Atta nt 2 Item Number Industrial Rates - Net Cost of Service Methodolo Item Number ADMOB-00 9 Y Schedule of Estimated Impact on Permit Users Dollar Amount Increase Fiscal Year 074B Adml Clprges Under ne Gross Cost of Seryme MrInOdOlpgy(1) Propped FY OBOB Est.Dhages Unae,nre N.I Cocl or SI-1 eMelhoddo0y(1) Tm1 VP, TOSISOD Toll Fbw Clwve BODCA, MClara lme T.CmdN I f{pOINT NSSPe®LL chod.h40. 0.e�P110L MASK TECHNOLOGY INC. 00026 0]920 0.1900 $755 $275 $99 $1.130 $137 $993 $62G $316 111 $1223 S230 2]% GARGi LPRODUCTION LLC 09384 _OWN _ 0.0000 $721 $0 $0 5721 $162 S560 $169 EO $0 $789 $229 41% GALLADE CFIEMICAL INC. OLTIW 0.670 0.6830 $551 $234 $304 $1,089 $192 1097 S602 $269 $240 S"I" $223 25% ACCURATE METAL FA lit"TORS INC. 3.2361 S9340 3300 S2487 12.064 $1121 $6273 $0 $6,273 32.719 $2371 $1,46A $6.4% $221 4% GEORGE A.JOKES,IMPER4LL 62 VIELL 1,7704 030401 00570 $1361 $IN $30 $1,496 $77 $1419 T."a $121 $24 SI,W $214 15% H O.OIL OPERATIONS TRUST_ 10331 0.96501 00000 $794 $336 SO $1,130 Sao $LOAD $868 $386 SO _ S1,3331 $213 21% ROCK INDUSTRIES.INC. _ _ _ 01719 I.0601 02710 $363 $659 $141 ST163 $104 $1,059 $397 $757 $115 silmi $210 20% CADILLAC PLATING,INC. 0.95% DOW 0.37W $742 $167 S195 51,1D5 $149 3956 $811 $192 $159 j6.1{2' $207 UK SUPERIOR PROCESSING _ _ 0.85% 0.2540 0.IWO $661 S88 $55 $6041 $139 56% $722 $101 $45 p0 $20 31%' OR SMOOTHIE ENTERPRISES _ 0.U16 00070 0.M70 $32 $30 $AS _ i182_ SIBS SO $35 $35 $37 $"1 $201 NIA IMPERIAL PIATING _ OAUS 0.0200 00260 $103 $9 $14 __{I{2 $431 30 $113 $10 S11 __ Vol' $201 NIA LOCI GRAPHICS INC. _ 0.5728 0.1M0_ 0WIN, _ _ S4W $so $35 "36' Also S_3)91 f4B1 $69 $29 $97, Poll 0% ANDRES TECHNICAL PLATING INC - 00455 0.OB5P - OWN $35 $33 $49 1I82 $179 U $38 $38 H0 5201 USS 014% ALLOY TECH ELECTROPOLISHING INC. 04308 O23201 0.1170 $337 $91 $61 $478. $165 U14 P69 $93 ISO $511 $197 0% CAPRO OIL COMPANY 1.83M 0.m 0.0000 S11409 $o 30 _51,4091 $64 $1.34IS $1.541 $0 SO $1.E41 SIAS 15% INDEPENDENT FORGE COMPANY _ _ 0.210E 0.2680 _ 0.2890 $162 SIDI $151 U131 $189 {124 S177 S115 $123 U15 $101 05% O'DONNELL OIL LLC _ _ 0.4611 041801 0.0190 SAM $7 f10 $371 $156 _ _ W6 S387 $8 58 UO3 $in 66% 5T PACIFIC QUARTZ. RTZ.IINC _ 3131.6 >O.29WI 711.AM f$1.010 $24$519 $JB330 $$1.859 S$71 p40M S28A26 $2$596 $2$269 f$1.269 $184 0% PACIFIC OUA CIRCUI _ 09146 OWN O.B330 S1703 $278 AN $1.090 371 3_son $$769 $596 E269 $1.177 $101 18% SOUTH COAST CI,INC. 62_ _ _I_091a7 0.o" 02590 $589 $$18 f$28 $635 127 UN $769 E$20. 123 148 UN 3S% SOLDERTETECN INC. I 07657 0.05]U 0.D530. f509 237 328' SIDS S142 $507 S643 3211 W __ 59s7 3144 U% CRITERION SK.MA INC. _ - -I_0.6,10 0.0010 0.3910 5302 $142 $141 SIDImis S151 SW S330M13 $272 f113 _ 5717 �1{0 33% CRITERION MACHINEWONRB 0.6110 0.9250 0.3810 - Units- 70 $322 $254 3184 f$94 S4M $771 $370 $128I fW _ 1n - 16% I P CCAL TECHNOLOGY,INC. 00171 0.9260 �0.3020 $745 SJTT $157 f1,164 S94 _�1050_ $814 $294 $128 $1.269 §11S 16X IPCCAL FLEx INC. _ OB6B7 0.7JSOi- OA650 $745 $258 {346 $1.347 §t33' $1rZ1S SB14 S2B4 5203 $1,390 1A 19% S 8 C OIL CORPORATION 0 U91 OOObI O.B000 $22 $0 f0 $182 $i51 _ $Et - $24 f0 f0 1201 On SID% WHEEL SERVICES GROUP.INC. imle I83M 03190 $1.024 $639 $114 10,A6 $0 fi.ns_ $1.119 $733 $93 $1.946 SIN I" LAHABRAPLATING CO.INC. _2.0520 041M 0_UDI $1.577 S143 $85 f1.BD5 Et6 _ {1�1{0 _ ft]N fi6< E70 {1,958 f1N f1f TOYOTA RACING DEVELOPMENT 2.2892 4.19I0 4.1M0 ft)60 f1159 52,160 f5.379 5184 _ Sg18b $1024 $L676 f1 i62 {5,]63 f18) 3% PRECISION POWDERCOATING INC. OMXM 0.2460 DAM $154 06 $54 E2941 5149 _ $1" $168 $98 $44, $]11 SIAS 114% KENLEN SPECIALITIES INC. 0.477 019W 0.1900 $359 $68 S102 Sam $130 $314 $393 $78 $831 $555 $161 41% KINSSUPSKY BROTHERS SUPPLY INC. 18112 f00B0 09220 $1230 U79 $460 $2097 $77 _ $2.020 $1351 $435 $392 $2.180 fits 9% ALUMINUMPRECISION PRODUCTS INC CENTRAL 2.0266 1.IWO 05650 S1,559 HI6 f305 $2266 SO 9.200 {1105 $478 S249 62.431 $151 )% BURLINGTON ENGINEERING.INC. _0.3172 1A9110, 0.1580 92" $521 S82 $847' Sao $751 $267 $598 $07 $932 $151 19% DUNHAM METAL PROCESSING _1.9764 0.81401 0.445450 $1,519 $283 $238 $2,040 $10 2.0301 $1.661 $325 T94 $2.180 $15D 7% NOLIAC OIL COMPANY 1.5516 OOBB01 00190 $1193 $33 $10 $1,236 $35 f1.200 $1,304 $38 U $1.350 $150 12% (CIRCUIT TECH INC. 0.W75 046601 0.1520 $159 $162 $79 U01 S124 $2771 S174 S1B6 $65 U25 $To 54% KRYLERCORPORATION 2M71 0.27% 0.2750 SIAN $96 $143 U935 So $1.935 $1,855 $110 $117 $2.081 SIAS 8% POWOERCOAT SERVICES.INC.#3 _ _ 0.M35 009W Dow $156 $33 us $239 $133 S100' _$171 $38 SAO $249 $144 139% OLYMPIC POWDER COATINGS INC. 0.2171 0.C70 04070 $167 $142 $212 $520 $142 {379 $182 $163 $173 $510 vim "A PRECIOUS METALS PLATING I a.5931 0.1050 0.10SO SIAS $37 S55 $539 $100 SU9 S490 $42 $45 $577 313E 31% PNECON.INC. 1 0.4101 11750 02370 $315 $617 $123 f1.056 $37 $1,019 $345 $709 $101 $11154 $135 13% PIER OIL COMPANY 0.5306 0woo 0NOD U08 SO SO SAW E08 $320 $446 f0 $0 W6 $126 441% AUTO{NLOR SYSTEM OF WASHINGTON.INC. 00730 10720 00200 SEA _ 1373 S10_ _ $439 $67 $372 $61 S428 $8 USA $126 34% SPEEDY CIRCUITS.FACILITY 02 1 0.2175 0453G 0.4S3G $IB) U58 $236 $561 $130 U31 $183 Star $192 S556 $126 20% %Zx ELECTRONICS 0.1517 01820 00290 $117 $63 $15 $195 $105 $90 $127 $73 $12 $213 $123 13M GOMTECH ELECTRONICS,INC._ 0.3097 14230 OWED $239 $495 $29 $762 $30 $732 $260 SAW $24 $953 $120 16% SUPERIORPIATING - 17029 0.4490 0.3070 $1.309 $158 $160 $1,625 $0 $1.625 $1431 $179 $IN $1.741 $116 )% VEECO ELEOTRD FAB INC.Y2 0.2837 0.0410 00410 $210 $14 S21 $254 $97 $157 23B $16 $17 $272 $115 73% (1)Utilizing Flow Data from FY 06-07 (2)-Tax Credits based on Taxes paid in FY 06-07 (3)-Per Million Gallons (4)Per Thousand Pounds 6 Item Number ADMOti-0g Industrial Rates - Net Cost of Service Methodology Schedule of Estimated Impact on Permit Users Dollar Amount Increase RPaI Y.U48Acppl UMrae Gam C9MM99Mta MWR09 1) Pmpmaa PY 0809 all.Cne UMr ilia W Cu19t 8r+ka 1 r Exun D ALUMI MFORGEY 1 1.1189: __tdgpr_0A7r0 1 R 1, i N19 T .Ml 1" 7% sHREEA PLATNGf COATNOINC. 1.NN 0.1570! O.OB90- 17191 st „N .im it I" W W 1ANI N13' 9% SERRANOWATERDWTRICT 1.aN11 _..,cone 0.02ro 1 2 I 141 +,W N_ N10N 1 �Br itt 19N +13 : 9% OUNMERB AThE11C SERVICE 159811_.„„_1.Y810' QB1N N 3 $me _- 1,9N f11Y2e it.tn Nte N4a W +ti Bx AOUALON COMPANY o.nstl O.fiiol-TM-0 + a, an- $eo9-- "_..... fei1.__...-9ebij ee! �O i+10 I" TIERMALVAC TEC111401.00Y.INC. 2.02501 _. 0?Ml O.me 1aN N77___,_ 6 2N 0 -�}41 �1021 181 i9Nl N.Nr 10. M23a% ELECTRO METAL WNSNINO CORP0MT10N 01744 0.3100 0311 134 10 __ 110 i9N__�1 i�6B_--z141�1241 '�NI im UNttEDCIRCUITTECNNOLOOYINC. _ O.gBO 0.81g1 O]3B0 21< i1771 Nm _�Otl_. pp ._._ .awl 51M ifN, f/N _ _ _ � N51 1 11% PA ONN2DOOR0 INC. 0�71. 05411M 0. " W _ --_� s$ 61 q C-i ,m m +I 'm isz DATA SOLDER INC. 0.43m O w- 0�1lCO 9se, ro 1 NN -�N 0 Ni M MARx OPTICS MC. 0.91se OAa40 0. 1 127 ig81 11 f2N 146 113 PORE INal-P RE LLC 0. 1� ] 11 SSr7. -� OR 'in PURECHEMPROWDT9C ANYINC. M-7 1-W O.OWro tm n13' n NM f1401 I� W 33% ACRDBURR IN Sm) 0.tON O.EI i20 1 e31J 3B f2N fn41 - C3 O3 371 W 97% STAR CUST M PlA NIING. aS0731 0.3BIV . 1 085 CUSTOM PIATNGINC. O.Br87., 0.4pro 0.40ro 52R 1 2 rol N N9 arol„ 1NI TT3�NI Ar 9% CITYCFNEWPORTOEACH_.0 L 2.UT90 0.370 - 1.NW + _____I _- � NAN__-f _� n0 N1N S" 9% HI TECH 90LAER- O.N09 03740 O.OBN flq N fW a9g N40 _ 0 Nt sA IM IND16111L1l METALnNI9NIN0.INC. Qmro O.NO All1i 1 41 1 1 $47OI._ Saro - 21 fro 1PA POWOERCOAT SERNCE9 INC.pt OSN1 "._._.0.5G0 -O�a T2 --311R 1Y" s]ZB r iRr 791_"-_N7.4i -gym 11 �A 91 UNITED CUSTOM POUSIONOBPIA G 0l 0.1140 0.1 186 7 +' -smm l 7N m% IUTNUM CIRCunS,INC." ---"- 0.99e 1.0m oABq -Z+JB W1 -- 7 etAl 21 m1 NI 11% MRTWELL Col! MTON .9481 5.1180 4.NE 1{7-m. st 11 N 71 1e3 11 Sl 7 f ola 81.7311 1 0 W 1% XELLMAN PROPOER11E8 LLC" GB1141 O.EE OAOE W91I_...- N i0 NN 7W N 1 _ IN ....MANUFACTURED PACML9N0 PRO ....- .7N1 "eag O.NN -_- i .-._. 68 19 1 -�.."""_..".............�_ 1aN Nt 8 1 1 �a8 3% ABGELE X _ BOmj OMO O.NOO 1B 4 - 7N W' s% S FPP.LP. N52. 01'N 0.110 _ aB 1q 14 4B M - OI' W 31% MS.eRLOWS ._..___ _ o.t=' 0010 O.m10 Nt 1N e8R3 W im7 itE NN' 111 L an FARJ p ERs.MG 0.0780 9.030 0.16N W_._... 6 NN - s�4e-�M �B6 m11 - W N% STRIP CLEAN COMPANY OAN3 001q- O.U+q Wt >sl"-- 7 s40.T Ets -" 5 NI tax W+ECIO100N C RC 1�_ 2 NO R8640 1 19 P 1 ,iN N ...i3,01 1,7ro ...__ 1810 PAEI H01 - -W 1% Dana 0.07E 17 11 m1 NI i%9 5B8 M01 B% IAGN POWDER COATNG_ 0.7010 OSWO OSSN I_1N 1 171 0 N1T _ ION 3% MERRY,X~ ---- _ 0.4714 0.2740 02r401 2I -- 91N --�A9 ---- iN i11O I CIE SP W 7% SNTIM MY FM19X C,]TN.__ 1, se 0.3390 Nml m --41" iro7 AQ 41 f424_ 1M NI W f% soUTNCALLMONLCo. 118 O.OBE 0�0 61�1 1 0 N2a N]p --T.19 Nt. 1 % oll/ilT'ALUMINUM FO . 1 0. - 1 1 31 W----jN7- -�]30 - 1 f09- 1 4% CTORYCIRCUITSINC. 0.1077_....._0.BW _ im oaEL_ 1 _ 1 m3 1 .11% AMSERWCE4 OA126 0.0m0 a : 10 N 14 51 1B Ta- 11 10 11 21% AL EN%Nl1eR WL COMPANY _ .11Bo1 0.00E 0.WU01 _-"- 6 so q _ i1N_ 19 iiN 140 q W In If REX IN+ERIAAT L Ol OS750 0.190, 11 else S41- iN4 $150 W 5% W.N.EWOn 0 "'VA"Of N SO N== ta2 N i17e 18% DRUMNERCIRCUUTECMNO INF 0.4757 0.14E O.1N01 NI N 7a _ N 3t7 B% VA NCIMAOE TH:IINOLGGY INC. VAIN 0.0N0 Omni4 3 �0 la In r% BIUNOLEmR& 0.14E _ OA000 0.a0Upl f1121 0 Inn N iiN t21 N so 19 tax Af KDE9URRINO T1Mp 0.1940 0.011U "a.03101.__- -itEl im 11 N& t+92 11 - 20fI s+9 In C.OWOEOWC.- --- --- O.ON7 OAW A310 191 I - +N /N 1( tY in (1)Utilizing FIOW Data from FY 06-07 (2)-Tax Credits based on Taxes paid in FY 0"7 (3)-Per Million Gallons (4)Per Thousand Pounds 7 V Item Number tem mberADM08-09 Industrial Rates - Net Cost of Service Methodology Schedule of Estimated Impact on Permit Users Dollar Amount Increase FYal Yeer07-08Aceel choMes UndMft(3NNo C0M0IServke (1) ft eedF1'"ESL clegee UMer Me NW Cmt WSeMm NelBodot (1) 3 t ..i i NJ7 C .. F r TAR n e*7BY poe.ru�e fl: monw. Zak Am TE INC. ODIq. 000'JO _ . IRWNE SEILSORS CORP -- - - - -- - - Otl1T - 02750' O.M10 SSN SBS _ _q3T _WY, 8519 S3ee _-" silo _ _f112 --SM_ SIB a% BRPOwDERCOAIINGo1C - am$ 0.1� O.1p0 �51�- S�B� f1N W -- $1 fN. 380- s61 �101. $17 e% CENR2AL POWDER DOAnNG �BB01 aI250 OD2N I01 SM ft�5 ' F188. sm W -_.._ M sid e% COLUMBINE ASSOCMTEs _ -_ Q1710 o` WXn 1a2: am. Poll Vol _StN _ f1M si _.. +--am.__ NERWOI D.YOEIINJOLUE LANE ENERGY LTD) O17h� ato50 gain $133 -as? W 5110(NAN �NI'___ 51p M f82 W «..� __ tl2 8% ROTD-0IECOMPANY INC - 0.tT1D._ 0.1710 O.1n0 ". SN qSi SO _ WB f22B __ BBB q3 p/1' _ f12 S% CYTEC EEREO MATERIALS INC -- -_ a10N 01300 a1N0 Nt _ Sea NB $105 qq $N _ sm _. ss SE, f% MILLETTINDUSTRIES -- - - e a _O.SI2o —1B$-_ _-- -- I - Vo —-- sm SM. A 4q2 iT 1% PERFORMANCE PONDER ING -- - — exal! 031" Q3 —� TiN -- s1m feBB - SMB f1B1 f12S q33 _ $2 1% TAYCO ENGINEERING INC —a7422 1TSA 1."a _ .q,SS] q2e 31N, _f0]1 S1.�Si _ 30 0% RTIELEOTRomrs INC OA185 10100 TA—IN q51 f1.�S0- �_ 1,212 SW7 sm sm .._M� ___. 42 U% .L N,,. sm _ _slid -�11i _S121 V-54. 43 .1% POwOERCOnr SERVNK5.01C N... O.u1_ _ a2390 S �N' - NB.__ sm _. sm _. UW FT oJrKI0 _ oaN _ $uv: _ s17o_ _ -1 --- sm "�' ieN - 1N qN, -lx CT'OFII%TIN-S1Ag1E1oY oaN1 - oTaao aiam -f�i S2S �Y2- - '--�-.. _$93I GN "qil tW is -1x SMWAEXOSPACE - tA0/o- NIO_ 13ro q 12t5 -�A11 - 13t .NS: �— M - q�d_1, �q�M sl.aaa ;,NS -N 0% sKHPoST WOUSTPoES INC OAN2._ f 112) - Ill I f0. - - qp 7518 gJ7B}, so 1,376 (i11 - _ �BN urz ZS,SM 4" .1% nMRENBEAPoNGINSPECTpi7_. _ - ._� OA7N( 20330 2.N]0 74 sm __�IAN S3,5N. � 518 1B- � � fNl _jtAif 4s0 -1% FOAMEX L.P.-- - IMN _ 3717 SAB7D - AN 2q !{1.B2t £B,fep: �'— - gbrol -"31,45 _f1A57 �B B10 _4V I% METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT tAwi -_ SN- s2A91 �I,Y7B �'- m q 1 Ilm _..Si.N7. t4N5 f17 -I% _.. ___ 1 I g751 1 5 �,S/B 4N .1x CRESTNA110NALDIGITPLMEOIA 19T25 - ONro ♦W 81AN _ SI 721 - - 123 - 1 -- 1AN __ f02 0-2 NB .lx R L RESEARCH INSDIUIE ILC I -WOW 4. 'Ala Im lam i ��� sOUrHIatN CALIPORNW EDISON 2IA00: _ SZn 52190 q f1AU� 716 i5.tl1 S0 S4ml f2101 -- FTIS _� 452 '1% ST JUDE MEDICALGENTER -- I1.T7m. 2BSSN Ia3S90 An iB200 1aJ77 W,N1� 70� s22.N1 - - f10 T% 10681 _ 11 18 fCM 436� -1% CHILURENSHOSPITAL OF ORANGE CCUNIY ♦82b1 wollo 308110 711A05' -510751 3le,IN ge.7A11 N _ $"I _ g245B1 _ S129W 13.1ae g7�M1y 4a10 -1% I(N PERMANENIEMEOICAL CENTER - -495800 48.5800 15 172M- t �- a ' - ,333 - gBN2 $1BAo7 -�21A87 _IW.Nh 4421 .1% ANAHEIM NEeiowAL MEDICK CEt3rER N3010 man131.. 1� SqA% 4s" -I% UCI MEOMAL CENTER _ - N1AN_. 131.Z300 121-.2300 M 1 521� - 7_�1� 1 AI fir - q -- AN p1rgl jl}14 -Ix HWG MEMORW. IAL Bt tTrt 1275510 1Z1.SSW SO7p23 SW 188,ISe 1� 6iJ1i - N� qq - 1A07 iSO.NB __ KIM z r GN Tete _ - __- q,�M 1N'- NAgA78. _ fT78.NY. - loonj0l.. . latax8� . f1 iaAtl2te -q. !M aBl6lai:_ ftt m ga»Iipn I (1)Utilizing Flow Data from FY OB-07 (2)-Tax Credits based on Taxes paid in FY 06-07 (3)-Per Million Gallons (4)Per Thousand Pounds 9 Ordinance No. OCSD-01 requires that the annual cost of service calculated from the actual Permit User discharge and the adopted Permit User rates must be reduced by the property tax paid by that individual user. However, these taxes were already ., considered during the calculation of the reduced rates that are equivalent to the flat rate sanitary sewer service user fee. In July of 2004, staff recommended that it was appropriate to modify the computation of the rates for flow, BOD and SS so that Permit Users were not allowed two reductions for property taxes. Correcting this calculation was approved by the Board effective January 1, 2005 under the gross of property tax revenues since Ordinance OCSD-01 required credits be provided to permittees on property taxes paid. In November 2007, the Administration Committee contracted with Carollo Engineers to perform a Sewer Service Fee Rate Study that included the appropriate allocation of costs between and among pollutants (BOD, SS and Flow), including the basis for allocation of non-assignable costs, and that a "net cost of service" rate structure be developed for high industrial dischargers (permittees) that is fair and equitable to all rate payers. r Based on the results of the Carollo rate study, the proposed component unit cost to permittees is as follows: r FY 2008-09 Proposed Rate BOD $399.50 TSS $424.90 Flows $840.30 The actual impact on this new rate mode to each permittee is dependent on (1)the volume of Flow, and the content of BOD and TSS produced, as compared to what was discharged in the prior year and, (2) the amount of actual property tax credit received under the previous rate model versus the assumed average of property taxes paid by each permittee that is taken into consideration in the development of rates within the new model. The attached schedule is an estimate on the impact to each industrial discharger assuming that the strength and volume of the discharge remains the same. ATTACHMENTS rr 1. Summary Charts of Estimated Impact on Permit Users 2. Schedule of Estimated Impact on Permit Users (enclosed separately) JDR:LT:MW FOM No.O 1W3 R—W,0=1W Page 3 Book Page 13 1 t I t I t 1 t I t t t t t t 1 t Dollar Amount Increase > $20,000 Calculated Charges Oraaniz tion Name Current 2009 Percentage Dollar Amount M C P FOODS INC. $ 991,111 $ 1,137,098 15% $ 145,988 ALSTYLEAPPAREL-A&GINC. $ 775,071 $ 876,798 13% $ 101,727 STREMICKS HERITAGE FOODS LLC $ 605,409 $ 696,080 15% $ 90,672 KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC. $ 500,532 $ 563,688 13% $ 63,156 SEVEN-UP BOTTLING COMPANY $ 351.305 $ 402,009 14% $ 50,704 PEPSI-COLA BOTTLING GROUP $ 333,545 $ 383,586 15% $ 50,042 HOUSE FOODS AMERICA CORPORATION $ 321,765 $ 370,041 15% $ 48.276 AMERIPEC INC. $ 294,301 $ 337,692 15% $ 43,392 NOR-CAL BEVERAGE CO. INC. (NCB) $ 244,754 $ 279,860 14% $ 35,107 ¢� FULLERTON CULTURED SPECIALTIES $ 206,699 $ 237,423 15% $ 30.723 r KNOTT'S BERRY FARM FOODS $ 166,641 $ 193,111 16% $ 26,470 VAN LAW FOOD PRODUCTS, INC. $ 176,810 $ 203,129 15% $ 26,319 DEAN FOODS CO. OF CA. INC. (MILK PLANT) $ 166,701 $ 191.739 15% $ 25,037 U S D F $ 211,887 $ 236,595 12% $ 24,708 NOR-CAL BEVERAGE CO. INC. (MAIN) $ 149,788 $ 174,273 16% $ 24,485 JAZZ SEMICONDUCTOR $ 205.735 $ 228,653 11% $ 22,917 Net Cost of Service Methodology Industrial Rates - Net Cost of Service Methodology Dollar Amount Increase 180 165 160 140 d 120 F E Oho Q) 100 o d 83 0 80 d 60 54 E 3 2 40 9 16 13 20 El -, O 2- _2 2 1 0 0 1 2 $0 $500 $5,000 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80.000 $100,000 Dollar Amount Increase 2008-09 Rates: Flow-$840.30 per MG BOD-$399.50 per 1,000 lbs. TSS-$424.90 per 1,000 lbs. r r I I I r I I I I I I I I I-. r' [`1 C C . Industrial Rates - Net Cost of Service Methodology Percentage Increase 120 102 100 - - tn 80 d E L a - -66 52 0 L 40 1 30 32 E 7 20 Z 20 2 3 1 1 1 1 0 0% 1% 10% 15% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 200% 300% 400% 500% 6000% Percentage Increase 2008-09 Rates: Flow-$840.30 per MG BOD-$399.50 per 1,0001bs. TSS-$424.90 per 1,0001bs. ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE 0 Tusa.ofM. _ a�ov1oe AGENDA REPORT xemrvumhe um Number nw�m-io Orange County Sanitation District r FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Administrative Services r SUBJECT: STATUS ON THE RENEWAL QUOTES OF THE DISTRICT'S MAJOR INSURANCE PROGRAMS FOR FY 2008-09 ,. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Informational Item SUMMARY r The District budget provides funds for the renewal of four major insurances connected with the Districts operations: ., 1) Excess General Liability Insurance 2) All-Risk Property and Flood insurance 3) Excess Workers' Compensation 4) Boiler & Machinery insurance These policy renewals are scheduled to be presented to the Committee at its May Committee meeting. The District's Insurance Broker of Record will present a short status report in April and will be in attendance in May to provide quotations. •+ PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS In June 2007, the Board approved renewals of the major insurance coverages for FY 2007-08. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION r 1) Excess General Liability Insurance Program The District's Excess General Liability Insurance Program is currently provided through the California Municipal Excess Liability Program ("CAMEL") and its new sister program, the Alliant National Municipal Liability Program("ANIMAL"). The District has ., participated in the CAMEL program since FY 1996-97. This program currently provides the District with a $25 million policy of comprehensive coverage for municipal liability, bodily injury and property damage, and personal injury. The program was structured to also include Employment Practices, and Public Officials .+ FOm,NO.ONF1023 R"iaed.01DIN] Page 1 r Book Page 17 I L Errors & Omissions coverage. The $25 million coverage is per occurrence, with a self- I j insured deductible of$250,000 per occurrence. Since 1997, the Employment Practices 1. portion of coverage was enhanced from a $2 million sub-limit, to the full $25 million policy limit. The actual insurance coverage currently consists of two separate layers. The first layer L+ is the "Basic" $10 million program with self-insured retention of$250,000. The second L layer consists of$15 million of coverage in excess of the first layer of$10 million. 2) Excess Workers' Compensation Insurance u The District's Excess Workers' Compensation insurance coverage is with the California State Association of Counties Excess Insurance Authority ("CSAC EIA"). This is the y fifth year the District has participated in this program or its predecessor. The coverage expires on June 30, 2008. The District's Excess Workers' Compensation Program currently provides coverage to $300 million with a self-insured retention (SIR), or Lr deductible of$500,000. The District's use of Excess Workers' Compensation insurance dates back to 1989-90. iJ At that time, the Fiscal Policy Committee approved a self-insured retention (SIR), or deductible, of$250,000, for such coverage. L Due to the hardening of the workers' compensation market, this deductible was raised to $500,000 beginning in FY 2002-03 through a policy with Employers Reinsurance ( , Corporation (ERC) that provided coverage to $25 million with a self-insured retention fr (SIR), or deductible of$500,000. Staff has reviewed the District's most recent five-year workers' compensation loss �+ history with Cambridge Integrated Services Group, the District's third-party workers' compensation administrator. Staff is seeking workers' compensation insurance renewal l with coverages and deductibles at statutory limits. 6+ Some additional risk is associated with the CSAC EIA joint powers authority in that a ) j premium surcharge can be assessed to individual members based on an unusually u large number of losses occurring outside of the actuarial evaluation estimates. However, historically the CSAC EIA premiums for excess workers compensation have been so much less than competing quotes that even if there were a surcharge, the cost might still continue to be cheaper. 31 All-Risk Property and Flood Insurance �J The District's All-Risk Property and Flood Insurance Program ("Property Insurance") expires June 30, 2008, and is now up for renewal for FY 2008-09. The All-Risk �L insurance program provides for comprehensive coverage for the District's real and personal property regarding virtually all perils including fire, flood, and business interruption. IL ,J F.m No. Page 2 L Book Page 18 r The District previously carried earthquake insurance as part of its Property Insurance, but in the last few years earthquake insurance has been impossible to obtain or not cost-effective. Currently, the District has earthquake insurance only in connection with some of its buildings under construction. The District's current Property Insurance limits are $1 billion for most perils other than flood and earthquakes, and $175 million for flood, with many sub-limits for various situations. In order to reach $1 billion in limits, the District's broker had to arrange for nearly a dozen different layers of insurers. The Self-Insured Retention ("SIR") is $25,000 per occurrence for most types of losses. For nine consecutive years, the District's Property Insurance has been with a nationwide joint purchase property insurance program called Public Entity Property Insurance Program (PEPIP); one of the world's largest property programs. It is important to note that this joint purchase property insurance program offers the purchasing power of numerous large public entities without the pooling or sharing of -" coverages or losses. The District's broker, Alliant Insurance Services, is also acquiring quotes for Earthquake Insurance, and will know by May 14, 2008 if the quotes are cost-effective. 4) Boiler & Machinery insurance Staff recommends the annual renewal of Boiler & Machinery insurance coverage for the District covering the period from July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009. The Boiler & Machinery insurance program provides comprehensive coverage for loss caused by machinery breakdown and explosion of steam boilers or other covered process equipment, including damage to the equipment itself and damage to other property caused by covered accident. The District's current Boiler & Machinery insurance program provides coverage ($100 million per occurrence with deductibles ranging from $25,000 to $350,000) for losses caused by covered machinery breakdown (e.g., motors, steam turbines, digesters, coven engines). Damages to the equipment, as well as damages to other property and improvements caused by the machinery breakdown, are covered by the Boiler & Machinery insurance. This program augments the District's all-risk property insurance that covers perils such as fire and flood. JDR:LT:MW FOM No,ON 1=3 Rw.MIN7 Page 3 r Book Page 19 ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE r�o9/DsDee Toed.ofD4. oa/w AGENDA REPORT � N=tK �"'N° N� nrx W11 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Administrative Services SUBJECT: FY 2008/09 BENEFITS PROGRAM RENEWAL COSTS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION r Information only. SUMMARY The total cost of insurance coverage is projected to increase approximately 8.1% for the forthcoming fiscal year (FY 2008/2009). Staff has been working with the insurance broker, Alliant Insurance Services, to determine renewal rates so that appropriate funds are budgeted for the increases. Staff anticipates the following premium increases: Insurance Provider Rate Change Comments Medical HMO Blue Cross 9.99% .. Medical POS Blue Cross 9230A Medical PPO Blue Cross 8.99% Retiree Only Plan Medical Kaiser Pertnanente 11.71% ,r Dental Delta Dental 0.00% Rate Pass Vision VSP 0.00% 4-Year Rate Guarantee FAP MHN/CSAC 5.80% Life/Disability Me"e 0.00% 3-Year Rate Guarantee The total cost increase for FY2008/09 is$645,770, which is proportionally shared as follows: OCSD cost: $520,860 .. • Employee cost: $124,910 Historical Summary: Anticipated Rate Rate Increase Rate Increase Rate Increase Increase FY FY 07108 FY 06107 FY 05/06 r 08109 Blue Cross 9.4% 17.5% 8.8% 4.0% Kaiser 11.7% 21.9% -0.3% 4.70k Delta Dental 0.0% 9.8o 0.0% 1.5°h r F.N°.owtvla mrimr Page 1 ` Book Page 20 i PRIOR COMMITTEEIBOARD ACTIONS N/A L' ADDITIONAL INFORMATION As per Article 20 (Insurance), section 20.1 of the Memorandums of Understanding, the District �+ and Group agreed to reopen the Article for the purpose of developing cost containment initiatives in the existing health plan and/or to change insurance carriers. Under the purview of the Labor Relations Committee, OCSD and the bargaining groups formed a Health Insurance Advisory Sub-Committee which worked with Alliant Insurance Services in an effort to review cost containment initiatives. These initiatives are subject to the meet and confer process; negotiations are scheduled to begin in April 2008. u The Health Insurance Advisory Sub-Committee has reviewed alternative renewal options which I I more closely reflect trends in pharmacy and HMO office co-pays. The alternatives provide the y potential to reduce the total medical premium increases by approximately 2.94% - 4.64%. Changes to the benefits plan are subject to the meet and confer process. JDR:LT:JR:KE L L U U L u Form No.mxtox.a Page 2 Book Page 21 r ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE "o+/tyros"bigD T°B" OFaF AGENDA REPORT ��,� "°""g Orange County Sanitation District r FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Administrative Services SUBJECT: 2008-09 AND 2009-10 DISTRICT PROPOSED BUDGET UPDATE r GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Informational item. SUMMARY This report will provide an overview of the District's 2008-09 and 2009-10 Proposed Budget. The Proposed Budget will be presented to the full Board for adoption on June 25, 2008. Highlights of the Proposed 2008-09 —2009-10 Budget include: 1) Limited Growth Total resource requirements are projected to grow by 15% for 2008-09 as the projected budgeted expenditures ($589 million) represent a $76 million change from the 2007-08 budgeted expenditures ($513 million). In the following year, however, total resource requirements are projected to decrease by 18% as the projected budgeted expenditures for 2009-10 are $481 million. r 2) A revised Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Staff projects that CIP expenditures for 2008-09, excluding debt service, ($359 million) will increase by 18% from the 2007-08 budgeted expenditures ($302 million). CIP expenditures are then expected to decrease by 32%to $244 million in 2009-10. 3) Strong Financial Position The budget assumes ongoing revenues and reserve levels that are sufficient to maintain the District's AA Bond Rating. Bonds rated AA are judged to be of high quality by all standards. 4) Increased Staffing Levels As previously described by the General Manager, the Proposed Budget includes a 1% increase in Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) positions in 2008-09 (641 FTE) and 2009-10 (648 FTE) as compared to an authorized total of 634 FTE in 2007-08. A number of positions have also been changed or transferred between divisions to r better address operational priorities as new facilities come online. r Fmm No.DLV1023 PeNrE:0391101 Page 1 r Book Page 22 5) Two-Year Budget Staff has once again prepared a two-year budget. Because a separate CIP review Ir and approval process exists, a two-year budget is appropriate and more effective for the District. Staff will provide annual updates on all major expense categories. L Two Year Budget Summary Revenues: 2008-09 2009-10 Lj Fees & Charges $219 million (37%) $242 million (460%.) General Income $117 million (20%) $116 million (22%) I ' Debt Proceeds $256 million (43%) $173 million (32%) (,) Total $592 million $531 mi11i_on Expenditures: 2008-09 2009-10 jJ CIP, including Debt $441 million (75%) $326 million (68%) Treatment and Disposal Costs $148 million (25%) $155 million (32%) Total $589__mditn $A81_milli_on I.I PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS i I None. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION I� The Budget Development Process I Staff completed a comprehensive list of assumptions to apply to the budget relating to LI costs, revenue, rates, inflation, etc. These assumptions were subsequently recommended by the Administration Committee and approved by the Board. I i With these guidelines in mind, District finance staff reviewed all major District resources LI and expenditures. The General Manager met with each department head and division leader to review, discuss and prioritize each department's major activities. V These activities were also reviewed to ensure alignment with the District's goals. A formal process for reviewing these goals will be established as a part of the annual is update of the District's Strategic Plan. ) Revenues and Expenditures Revenues ' ! The Sanitation District obtains its revenues from three main sources: 2008-09 2009-10 W Fees & Charges $219 million (37%) $242 million (46%) General Income $117 million (20%) $116 million (22%) Debt Proceeds $256 million (43%) $173 million (32%) Total $592 million $531 million — I Fom,No.0 IW3 R�,y RyOyW Pape 2 Book Page 23 2008-09 2009-10 A) Fees— $219 million (37%) $242 million (46%) 1) General User Fees $183 million $203 million User fees are ongoing fees for service paid by customers connected to the sewer system. A property owner, or user, does not pay user fees until connected to the sewer system and receiving services. Once connected, a user is responsible for his share of the system's costs, both fixed and variable, in proportion to his demand on the system. These fees are for both Single-Family Residences (SFR) and Multiple-Family Residences (MFR). 2) Permit User Fees $ 16 million $ 18 million Permit fees are paid by large industrial and commercial property owners connected to the sewer system. These fees are for the owner's share of the system's costs, both fixed and variable, in proportion to his demand on the _ system. Since the inception of the Permit User Fee program in 1970, users of the District's system that discharge high volume or high strength wastewater have been required to obtain a discharge permit and pay extra fees for the costs of service. The fees are initially calculated on the basis of actual flow, Biochemical- Oxygen Demand (BOD), and Suspended Solids (SS) discharged to the sewer and are subsequently reduced by the actual property taxes they have paid to the District. This practice is intended to ensure that these users pay their actual cost of service through a combination of user fees and property taxes. 3) Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC) $ 20 million $ 21 million The Capital Facilities Capacity Charge charged to newly connected customers and to customers with facility expansions which indicate a potential for increased flows. It is intended to pay for costs of future plant growth that is necessitated by the additional capacity needed as customers connect or increase their flow capacity. The District's current rate structure allows for increases in CFCC in accordance with the Engineering News Record (ENR) Index. B) General Income — $117 million (20%) $116 million (22%) 1) Property Taxes $ 65 million $ 68 million The County is permitted by State law(Proposition 13) to levy taxes at 1% of full market value (at time of purchase) and can increase the assessed value no more than 2% per year. The District receives a share of the basic levy proportionate to what was received in the 1976 to 1978 period less $3.5 million, the amount that represents the State's permanent annual diversion FOM No.oW lW3 Page 3 Book Page 24 Y� from special districts to school districts that began in 1992-93. The District's share of the 1% ad valorem property tax is dedicated for the payment of COP debt service. The apportionment of the ad valorem tax is pursuant to the y Revenue Program of the Environmental Protection Agency and the State Water Resources Control board and in accordance with COP documents and Board policy. As a result of the State's previous fiscal crisis, the District received a 40% reduction of its full allocation of property tax funds for fiscal years 2004-05 and 2005-06. The actual dollar amount of reduction was $32.4 million over this two-year period. Although the funding level was restored in 2006-07, the State is now in another fiscal crisis, and special district property tax revenue takeaways are now again being considered by the State. 2006-09 2009-10 2) Interest $ 18 million $ 19 million Interest earnings are generated from the investment of accumulated reserves consisting of a cash flow/contingency, a capital improvement, a renewal / replacement, and a self-insurance reserve. 3) Other $ 34 million $ 29 million The Other General Income category is comprised of a variety of smaller dollar items. Charges to Irvine Ranch Water District for Revenue Area 14's share of the treatment plant's operating costs, capital costs, and equity are approximately $26 million in 2008-09 and $21 million in 2009-10. C) Debt— $256 million (43%) $173 million (32%) V 1) Certificates of Participation (COP) Certificates of Participation (COPS) are the District's primary mechanism for financing capital projects. COPS are repayment obligations based on a lease or LW installment sale agreement. COPS are not viewed as "debt" by the State of California, but rather a share in an installment arrangement where the District serves as the purchaser. L Expenditures 1 , u The District spends it funds on two activities: 2008-09 2009-10 L CIP, including Debt $441 million (75%) $326 million (68%) Treatment and Disposal $148 million (25%) $155 million (32%) 1 Total $569 million $01 million 66 L L Fa mNo.O 1=3 RwWlOIIOIgI PW4 L Book Page 25 A) Capital Improvement Program (CIP) — $441 million (75%) $326 million (68%) The District's CIP can be divided into five distinct areas 1) Secondary Treatment Facilities 2) Ground Water Replenishment _ 3) Treatment Plant Rehabilitation and Upgrades 4) Collections 5) Debt Also related to the CIP are the District's debt service payments. Primarily, debt is issued to support the capital program because the program is too large to be supported by a "pay-as-you-go" basis. Additionally, if the District were able to fund these projects on a "pay-as-you-go" basis, there would be an equity issue to be addressed, as current rate payers would fund all of the costs of projects for which future rate payers would receive a portion of the benefits. As previously mentioned, the District issues debt in the form of Certificates of Participation (COPS). COPS are a form of lease revenue bond that permits the investor to participate in a stream of lease payments, installment payments or loan payments relating to the acquisition or construction of specific equipment, land or facilities. 2008-09 2009-10 B) Treatment and Disposal Costs — $148 million (25%) $155 million (32%) Staff projects $148 million and $155 million in 2008-09 and 2009-10 respectively to perform the operations at the District's two treatment plants and other related treatment activities, as well as support activities not directly charged to CIP. Treatment and disposal activities include wastewater treatment processes, biosolids disposal, disinfection and odor control. Expenditures for the purchase of chemicals represent the largest non-salary related component of the budget. Support activities include Regional Assets, Technical Services, and Administration. JDR:LT:MW rem No.DW 1a1 a �°° :mrolror Page 5 Book Page 26 ,I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (714) 962-2411 www.ocsd.com Mailing Address: R.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 i Street Address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018