The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007-01 MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, January 24, 2007, at 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Jim Ruth, General Manager Jim Ferryman, Chair Bob Ghirelli,Assistant General Manager Doug Davert,Vice Chair Nick Arhontes, Director of Operations and Mark Waldman, F&A Committee Chair Maintenance Larry Crandall, E&O Committee Chair Ed Torres, Director of Technical Services Steve Anderson, Past Board Chair Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Phil Luebben, F&A Committee Vice Chair Administrative Services Cathy Green, E&O Committee Vice Chair John Linder, Engineering Manager Jim Burror, Engineering Supervisor DIRECTORS ABSENT Michael Gold, Legislative Affairs Liaison Gail Garrett, Committee Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager Bradley R. Hogin, General Counsel Martin Holl, Associate Engineer Craig Farrington, Counsel David Francis, Source Control Inspector Terry Andrus, Counsel Kelly Christensen, Source Control Supervisor Scott Baugh, Lobbyist Kim Christensen, Lab Supervisor Holly Fraumeni, Lobbyist Angela Brandt, Accounting Supervisor Jackie Nutting, ABC Kelly Ross, Senior Laboratory Analyst Eric Christen, CFEC Chris Pelletier, Maintenance Specialist Deborah Chadwick, Court Reporter Juanita Skillman, Records Management Specialist George Rivera,(, SSeeLcEuritylj�Specialist ppop� (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM 0 "`"oU92 A150A O�STriICT No appointment was necessary. FEB 28 2007 (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS By; / Jackie Nutting, Government Affairs Director for Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC), Southern California Chapter, provided comments re design build and asked the Board to consider a draft resolution she provided. Eric Christen, Executive Director, Coalition of Fair Employment(CFEC), provided copies of IBEW Proposed Electrical Safety ordinance and email correspondence from Doug Chappel, IBEW,to District's General Manager, Jim Ruth. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 January 24, 2007 General Manager Jim Ruth reported that, as a result of Mr. Chappell's demand that the RFP stipulation mandate all projects over$200,000, he and District staff have cut off negotiations with IBEW at this time. He and Michael Gold, Legislative Affairs Liaison, will meet with IBEW representatives in the next 30 days to resume negotiations and explore other possible options. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Ferryman announced the 2007 CASA Washington DC Conference March 12-14. Notify Gail Garrett, Committee Secretary, if you will be attending the conference. Steve Anderson, Darryl Miller, and staff attended the January CASA Conference in Indian Wells, California. Mr. Anderson will provide a report to the Board tonight. Mr. Ferryman, Mr. Ruth, and Dr. Ghirelli met with the new General Manager and several SAW PA board members last week to discuss the SARI line relocation. Mr. Ferryman explained his goal is to work closely with the SAW PA board and staff to ensure that the project stays on track and to develop a financial plan to pay for the relocation. Chair Ferryman announced the upcoming committee meetings for February and the special New Board Member Orientation workshop scheduled for Thursday, February 1 from 8:00 a.m. -12:00 p.m. (5) REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER Mr. Ruth provided highlights of his activities for the past year in his January Status Report,which was included with the Board package. (6) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Brad Hogin explained that he will be recusing himself from the Hawk Industrial Uniform appeal hearing. Craig Farrington will prosecute the appeal and Terry Andrus will advise the Steering Committee during this hearing. Mr. Hogin exited the room at 5:47 p.m. (7) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve minutes of the December 20, 2006 Steering Committee meeting. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (8) ACTION ITEMS a. Hawk Industrial Uniform Appeal Hearing Mr. Ferryman announced the appeal by Hawk Industrial Uniform Company of the General Manager's decision to suspend Hawk's Wastewater Discharge Permit and Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 January 24, 2007 impose fees and penalties for alleged violations of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations. He explained the proceeding Is governed by the Rules of Procedure adopted by Resolution No. OCSD 98-13 and transcribed by a certified court reporter. Mr. Ferryman declared the hearing open at 5:50 p.m. Craig Farrington, staff counsel, explained he would prosecute the appeal hearing and introduced Ms. Deborah Chadworth, court reporter, who will provide a transcript of the hearing to be received and fled at a later meeting. No one appeared for the Permittee. Staff provided a brief presentation outlining the measures taken to enforce compliance by the permittee. Three documents, Exhibits"I" and'J",and the proposed decision and findings,were introduced and placed in the record. Mr. Ferryman called a five-minute recess at 6:01 p.m.for the Steering Committee to review the proposed decision and findings provided by staff counsel. Mr. Ferryman declared the hearing closed at 6:10 p.m. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Adopt the prepared Decision and Findings submitted by staff to uphold the determination of the General Manager and the monetary penalties in the amount of$126,293.23 and that the permit suspension shall continue for a minimum of thirty(30)days and until the total amount of$126,293.23 is received by the District,and until all necessary pretreatment equipment is installed and fully operational to District Staffs safisfaction; and, (2) Authorize Counsel to proceed immediately with filing a court order with contempt power(or a writ)enforcing immediate shutdown of Hawk's facilities. After being advised by Ms. Mahin Talebi that the District has the authority to administratively terminate Hawk's permit and shut down his facility to stop further contamination, it was then: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Staff was further directed to terminate Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit and shut down the Hawk Industrial Uniform facility,immediately. Mr. Hogin returned at 6:15 p.m. b. Desion-Build Legislation Michael Gold provided an update on recent staff meetings with union representatives and explained the practical limits of IBEW's request to apply apprenticeship training requirements to all projects, not only those over$10 million as originally proposed. Staff will continue to actively seek possible solutions to the union requests and work towards passing a bill granting design-build authority. Scott Baugh and Holly Fraumeni answered Directors questions and gave them a political perspective on the design-build issue. Mr. Baugh added that Senator Lou Correa,and Assemblymen Mike Duvall and Jim Silva, having been past District Board members,would reject ABC's letter to Orange County legislators implying the District had entered into inappropriate negotiations with the unions. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 January 24, 2007 Mr. Baugh suggested the Steering Committee allow staff to introduce a bill to meet statutory deadlines and explained that changes could easily be made after the Steering Committee meets on February 28. It was then: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Direct staff to(a)continue to negotiate with the unions and others, and (b) introduce desk n-build legislation to keep the District's options open and meet the February 23 filing deadline. (9) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-60—Lemon Heights Annexation Jim Burner, Engineering Supervisor, informed that staff will be requesting the Board to approve the annexation of 70 properties in the Lemon Heights area at a cost of $26,000. These costs will be reimbursed by the property owners when they conned to a sewer. Estimated fees to be collected from the 70 property owners in the future is approximately$605,000. b. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in February were reviewed. c. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to the Board at the January 24, 2007 meeting were reviewed. (10) OTHER BUSINESS. COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 7 p.m. (14) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at6:28 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Sections 54957(b)(1), 54956.9(b),and 54956.9(a)to discuss four matters. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Clerk of the Board. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Steering Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 January 24, 2007 Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Clerk of the Board in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the recommended actions will be publicly reported at the time the approved actions become final. At 6:40 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (15) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Submitted by: L-a�-� 6,(')'� Gai arrett Steering Committee Secretary N:beplYpeMalCommMee5451eervp Commgee12M8VAnWet1133W65C MinWes.tloc STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and the Agenda for the Steering Committee meeting held on Wednesday, January 24, 2007, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the District's offices on Thursday, January 18, 2007. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 24th day of January, 2007. Penny Kyle, Clerk of ifie Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Posted: 2007 12:00 p.m. By: Signature H bwp geM Zteenng C mmilleet wmeniliwim Fenn.DOC ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOTICE OF MEETING g+a� ti.: STEERING COMMITTEE .unNg add...: P. Ew51e; ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT K"I Fa WIOe. '4 5E7'efi 131e7 ebtti.Y�, 11'9nenVvlGA WEDNESDAY. JANUARY 24, 2007 - 5:00 P.M. e Aweraea Fl:um.K Vegay IS 9Z)Ofi)tilfi manaleger plegrakee DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES • 10844 ELLIS AVENUE am FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 a,allann www.ocsd.com 13'. &rene Iin" 31rnan IvmLv, NOlap f unw m:: 1;aro-, i ,"a A regular meeting of the Steering Committee of the H,wrigg: 5ea.:': Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation '-- District, will be held at the above location, date and time. Nelyn,:: Naa.1. Or„nge lia�:emis Same Ana Naar., Stanur: insun lNt.. NaH Y rh; Nna, OrantV at Orange Sanitary OIRn.G Mesa h4Cnny '.'4 wacar m.trmts Wa„,, H:\dept\agenda\Committees\Steering Committee\2007\SC Meeting Notice Fom.t.doc To maintain worlOclass leadership in wesraweter and water resource management STEERING COMMITTEE AND BOARD MEETING DATES FOR THE NEXT TWELVE MONTHS Wednesday, January 24, 2007 Wednesday, February 28, 2007 Wednesday, March 28, 2007 Wednesday, April 25, 2007 Wednesday, May 23, 2007 Wednesday, June 27, 2007 *Wednesday, July 18, 2007 Wednesday, August 22, 2007 Wednesday, September26, 2007 Wednesday, October 24, 2007 Wednesday, November 28, 2007 *Wednesday, December 19, 2007 *Tentatively rescheduled from regular fourth Wednesday. H9depl\agendaVSteedng Commltteet2 OWeeft Dales Fotml.d= STEERING COMMITTEE (1) Roll Call: Meeting Date: January 24, 2007 Meeting Time: 5,00 p.m. Meeting Adjourned: p.m. Committee Members Jim Ferryman, Board Chair.................................................— — Doug Davert,Vice Chair.....................................................— — Mark Waldman, F&A Committee Chair............................... Larry Crandall, E&O Committee Chair................................— — PhilLuebben.......................................................................— CathyGreen. ......................................................................— Steve Anderson..................................................................— Others Brad Hogin, General Counsel Craig Farrington, Counsel — Staff Present Jim Ruth, General Manager Bob Ghirelli, Assistant General Manager Nick Arhontes, Director of Operations & Maintenance Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering Ed Torres, Director of Technical Services _ Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance &Administrative Services Gail Garrett, Committee Secretary Other Staff Present Michael Gold, Legislative Affairs Liaison c: Lenora Crane H:\dept\a9enda\Committees\Steenng Commitlet,QODN3.Roll Call Sheet Fmm.3.dm AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 24, 2007 - 5:00 P.M. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California www.ocsd.com (1) ROLL CALL (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM, IF NECESSARY (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS (4) REPORT OF COMMITTEE CHAIR (5) REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER a. Monthly Status Report b. Legislative Affairs Liaison Report—M. Gold (6) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL (7) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. Approve minutes of the December 20, 2006 Steering Committee meeting. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Book Page I -2- January 24, 2007 Agenda Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. (8) ACTION ITEMS a. Hawk Industrial Uniform Appeal Hearing (Book Page 8) 1. Open hearing i. Receive and file written materials, if any ii. Verbal reports of staff iii. Directors' questions iv. Presentation by Hawk Industrial Uniform 2. Close hearing 3. Discussion by Steering Committee 4. Determination by Steering Committee whether to uphold, modify, or reverse the decision of the General Manager. b. Design-Build Legislation (Book Page 12) Direct staff to continue monitoring the political climate and negotiate with relevant parties re Design-build legislation. (9) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-60— Lemon Heights Annexation (Book Page 14) b. Review Agenda Items scheduled to be presented to Committees in January (Information item only) (Book Page 15) C. Review and consideration of Agenda Items for Board of Directors Meeting of February 28, 2007 (Book Page 16) (10) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING (12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT (13) FUTURE MEETING DATES The next Steering Committee Meeting is scheduled for 5 p.m., Wednesday, February 28, 2007. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for 7 p.m., Wednesday, February 28, 2007. Book Page 2 •3- January 24, 2007 Agenda (14) CLOSED SESSION During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Steering Committee,the Chair may convene the Committee in closed session to consider matters ! of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation,or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9. 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to(a)purchase and sale of real property;(b)matters of pending or potential litigation; (c)employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Directors during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Board on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. A. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE/DISMISSAURELEASE (Government Code Section 54957(b)(1))—Two employees 2. CONFERENCE WITH DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES Jim Ruth, General Manager; Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Administrative Services; Jeff Reed, Human Resources and Employee Relations Manager; and Paul Loehr, Human Resources Supervisor, re Meet and Confer Update re contract negotiations for employees represented by 1). Orange County Employees Association; 2). International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 501, and 3). Supervisors, Professional Management Team (part of Peace Officers Council of California) (Government Code Section 54957(b)(1).) 3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL RE. ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Government Code Section 54956.9(b))-Significant Exposure to Litigation-Number of Potential Cases: 1 Case:ARB Claim re Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements, Reach A, Contract No. 7-36; and Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 741 4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL RE. EXISTING LITIGATION [Government Code Section 54956.9(a)] One (1)case: Pacific Boring, Inc. v. Colich Construction and OCWD—Superior Court Case 06CC08950 B. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, If any, on matters considered in closed session. (15) ADJOURNMENT Acenda Postinc: In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2,this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. Book Page 3 4- January 24, 2007 Agenda Items Not Posted: In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Committee for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item or because there is a need to take immediate action,which need came to the attention of the Committee subsequent to the posting of agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted in the manner as above, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. Public Comments: Any member of the public may address the Steering Committee on specific agenda items or matters of general interest. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Committee except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). Consent Calendar: All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation, and unless a particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director of staff member, there Wll be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions,and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. The Committee Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Items Continued: Items may be wntinued from this meeting without further notice to a Committee meeting held within five (5)days of this meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(3). Meeting Adiournment: This meeting may be adjourned to a later time and items of business from this agenda may be considered at the later meeting by Order of Adjournment and Notice in accordance with Government Code Section 54955(posted within 24 hours). Accommodations for the Disabled: The Board of Directors Meeting Room is wheelchair accessible. If you require any special disability related accommodations,please contact the Orange County Sanitation District Board Secretary's office at(714)593-7130 at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Requests must specify the nature of the disability and the type of accommodation requested. Notice to Committee Members: For any questions on the agenda or to place any items on the agenda, Committee members should contact the Committee Chair or Secretary ten days in advance of the Committee meeting. Committee Chair. Jim Ferryman (714)283-5910 ext. 123 General Manager: James D.Ruth (714)593-7110 General Counsel: Brad Hogin (714)564-2606 Committee Secretary: Gail Garrett (714)593-7101 (714)968-4389 (Fax) E-mail: ggarret0ocsd.com HMEPMpEHM'COMMmEES1SfEERING COMMRriE%?W AGENDAZ1N.U12<07 AGENDA FONMA DOG l F Book Page 4 MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, December 20, 2006, at 6:00 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, December 20, 2006 at 6:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Bradley R. Hogin, General Counsel Jim Ferryman, Chair Doug Davert,Vice Chair STAFF PRESENT: Carolyn Cavecche, Chair, OMTS Committee Jim Ruth, Interim General Manager Darryl Miller, Chair, FAHR Committee Bob Ghirelli, Assistant General Manager Steve Anderson, Past Board Chair Nick Amontes, Director of Operations and Maintenance DIRECTORS ABSENT Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Vacant, County Supervisor Administrative Services Vacant, Chair, PDC Committee Gail Garrett, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were none. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR In the absence of Chair Jim Ferryman,Vice Chair Doug Davert informed that Director Steve Anderson will present a report to the Board on the November Washington DC legislative trip. Directors Anderson, Miller, and staff will attend the CASA conference in Indian Wells, California January 17-20, 2007. Vice Chair Davert announced the upcoming committee meetings for January and advised that the new Board Member Orientation workshop is scheduled for February 1, 2007. (5) REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER Mr. Jim Ruth provided highlights of his activities for the past year in his December Status Report,which was included with the Board package. Book Page 5 Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 December 20, 2006 He also announced the appointment of Edward Tones, Director of Technical Services. The interview panel included Bob Ghirelli, Nick Amontes, Jim Herberg, Jeff Reed, and Bob Horvath, LACSD. (6) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Brad Hogin informed that, as a result of additional comments received this afternoon re Kem County, Item 8(d) will be pulled from the consent calendar for further analysis. Chair Jim Ferryman arrived at 6:15 p.m. (7) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve minutes of the November 15, 2006 Steering Committee meeting. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Set a hearing date before the Steering Committee of January 24, 2007 for an Appeal by Hawk Industries of an order on administrative complaint. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (8) ACTION ITEMS There were none. (9) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in November were reviewed. b. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to the Board at the October 25, 2006 meeting were reviewed. (10) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. Book Page 6 Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 December 20, 2006 (13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 7 p.m. (14) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:20 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957,or 54957.6 to discuss four matters. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Clerk of the Board. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Steering Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Clerk of the Board in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the recommended actions will be publicly reported at the time the approved actions become final. At 6:30 p.m.,the Committee reconvened in regular session. (15) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Submitted by: Lai 6�r�� ail Garrett Steering Committee Secretary MNeV�ge a%Comm&ee tmNC mdl�m✓AI23 SC Aml .dc Book Page 7 STEERING COMMITTEE Meeang Date To ed.of Dir. 1/24/07 AGENDA REPORT 1fn Noibff r`tlnNinn er 8(a) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: The General Counsel, Representing Source Control Division SUBJECT: Hawk Industrial Uniform Appeal Hearing GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: The General Counsel representing staff recommends that the Steering Committee uphold the November 2, 2006 decision of the General Manager, James D. Ruth. SUMMARY Appellants Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins (collectively" Hawk`) appeal to the Steering Committee of the Board of Directors the November 2, 2006 decision of the District's Interim General Manager, James D. Ruth, imposing: 1) an administrative penalty in the amount of$45,000.00; 2) Hawk be required to pay the past due user charges, annual invoices, penalties and finance charges in the amount of$71,891.72; and 3) Hawk's Wastewater Discharge Permit Number 2-1-079 is to be suspended for a period of not less than thirty (30)days. The General Manager's determination was based on Hawk's violations of the bypass of industrial wastewater and altering monitoring data, failure to pay sewer use and associated charges, and eight additional discharge violations of the total toxic organics 8, oil and grease discharge limits in violation of the District's Ordinance and Hawk's industrial discharge permit. Furthermore, as of January 4, 2007, Hawk now owes the District the sum of$80,235.36. An administrative complaint hearing was held on October 24, 2006. Hawk Industrial Uniform failed to appear. The District received the hearing officer's findings dated October 30, 2006, which upheld the complaint. On November 2, 2006, the District forwarded the General Manager's decision, in conjunction with the appeal process. Hawk Industrial Uniform filed an appeal to the Steering Committee on November 17, 2006. The basis for the appeal is 1) Hawk Industrial Uniform alleges that an employee, Larry Booher, is responsible for the bypass; 2) the company had no knowledge of the bypass and therefore bears no responsibility for it; 3)the District was aware of the employee's responsibilities since correspondence was addressed to said employee; 4)the method and rate of annual reconciliation is incorrect and was changed without notice to Hawk Industrial Uniform; 5)the penalties incorporated in the amount due are improper; and 6) Hawk Industrial Uniform is engaged in efforts to reduce the effluent characteristically high in Total Toxic Organics(TTO). Based on the following responses, staff believes that the numerous issues raised in Hawk's appeal are completely without merit. Staffs responses to the basis of Hawk's appeal are as follows: 1) Larry Booher provided a declaration stating that Rusty Hawkins not only had knowledge of the bypass, it was done under his direction (please refer to Exhibit H,Attachment A). Fo,m No.M-ford pp-da e¢pvl-sc no xeasee: viveom Page 1 Book Page 8 2) As stated above, this claim has no merit. 3) Rusty Hawkins had designated Larry Soother as his official designee to receive correspondence from the District in regards to the enforcement actions (please refer to Exhibit H, Attachment B). 4) Based on the review of the invoices, the method to calculate the charges related to Hawk's invoices are correct and calculated in accordance with the District's Ordinance No. OCSD-30B. 5) As stated above, all the charges including penalties are correct. 6) Since the hearing notification dated September 12, 2006, Hawk has had ten If 0) additional discharge violations. Therefore, the District believes that Hawk has made no improvement to eliminate or improve their non-compliance with the discharge limits. Accompanying this report are documents (please refer to the Exhibit H) related to the October 24, 2006 hearing, the General Manager's determination, and the follow up actions. Therefore, staff urges that Hawk's appeal be denied and the General Manager determination of November 2, 2006 be upheld. PRIOR COMMITTEEIBOARD ACTIONS No prior actions. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not applicable. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑x Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Hawk Industrial Uniform, located at 1120 N. Armando Street, Anaheim, California, is an industrial laundry that rents and washes soiled uniforms, Floor mats, dust mops, gloves, and shop towels. Hawk Industrial Uniform also dyes and bleaches new shop towels and other materials. After washing, the items are dried, ironed as necessary, sorted, and returned to the respective clients. Rusty Hawkins, as President and owner, is responsible for the operations and industrial wastewater discharge activities at Hawk Industrial Uniform at all material times referred to in the Complaint. The Orange County Sanitation District (District) initially issued Class I Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-1-079 to Hawk Industrial Uniform in May 1994. Permit No. 2-1-079 contains discharge limits and standard conditions that comply with the District's Wastewater Farm No.M 102-1 �q,qa RepM-SL DW.NG RMW: ,nflROU> Page 2 Book Page 9 Discharge Regulations, Ordinance No. OCSD-01 (Ordinance). Since the initial permit issuance in May 1994, Hawk Industrial Uniform has had several major violations of its permitted Total Toxic Organic (TTO) and Oil & Grease (O&G) limits. Compliance meetings to address the discharge violations were held in February 2000; February 2004;and August 2004. The causes of the discharge violation were discussed and identified to be the laundering of shop towels laden with solvents and oils. Compliance orders to cease noncompliant discharges were also issued in January and July 2004. Hawk Industrial Uniform's response was limited to terminating its customer accounts thought to be the source of the TTO and O&G discharge violations. Since the corrective measures taken by Hawk Industrial Uniform failed to correct the discharge violations, in September 2004, the District required the company to install a pretreatment system to treat its wastewater prior to discharge to the District's sewer system. In October 2004, Rusty Hawkins informed the District by letter that, due to inadequate existing electrical service and City of Anaheim requirements, he could not commit to any specific dates for installation of a pretreatment system. Following Hawk Industrial Uniform's failure to install a pretreatment system, in May 2005, the District advised Hawk Industrial Uniform that the District will continue to monitor Hawk Industrial Uniform's discharge and, if another violation occurs, the District will escalate enforcement action. Although Hawk Industrial Uniform continued to wash shop towels, and despite continuing to operate without a pretreatment system, all of the onsite samples collected between January 2005 and March 2006 (with the exception of one TTO discharge violation in October 2005), were in compliance. On March 16, 2006, the District inspected Hawk's facility and discovered that the wastewater discharged from washing machines used to launder shop towels was pumped through a pipe which discharged directly to a manhole in the street, thereby bypassing the designated sample box at the end of the underground clarifier. Based on the configuration of the piping relative to the clarifier, the District concluded that Hawk Industrial Uniform has avoided representative sampling, and thus altered the monitoring data, by bypassing the District's designated sample point stated in its Permit No. 2-1-079. Bypass of industrial wastewater and altering monitoring data constitutes a violation of Sections 501.4 and 604.A.4 of the District's Ordinance and Section IIA.2 and III.E of Hawk Industrial Uniform's discharge permit. Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit also states that knowingly making any false statement on any report or other document required by this permit or knowingly rendering any monitoring device or method inaccurate is a crime and may result in the imposition of criminal sanctions and/or civil penalties. Furthermore, as of January 4, 2007, Hawk Industrial Uniform owes the District the sum of $80,235.36. The oldest invoices are now 385 days past due. Other than the recent permit renewal fee of$1570.00 and the hearing appeal fee of$400.00, the last payment received was on August 1, 2005 for the 2004/05 4'quarter invoice. An administrative complaint hearing was held on October 24, 2006. Hawk Industrial Uniform failed to appear. The District received the hearing officer's findings dated October 30, 2006, which upheld the complaint. On November 2, 2006,the District forwarded via certified mail, the General Manager's decision and permit suspension order, in conjunction with the appeal process. Hawk Industrial Uniform filed an appeal to the Steering Committee on November 17, 2006. On December 20, 2006, the Steering Committee scheduled Hawk Industrial Uniform's appeal hearing for January 24, 2007. F.l No.M-102-1 ApugaR�wl-SL Oep1.320 Rp : 1118 07 Page 3 Book Page 10 ALTERNATIVES Not applicable. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS Hawk Industrial Uniform Administrative Complaint (9/12/2006) Exhibit H, Attachment A - Declaration of Larry Booher (10/24/2006) Attachment B - Authorization for Designated Signatory (2/2 512 0 0 4) Attachment C - Administrative Complaint Hearing Decision and Order (11/212006) Findings of the Hearing Officer(1 0/3 012 0 0 6) Attachment D - Administrative Complaint and Hearing Notice (9/12/2006) Attachment E - Hawk Industrial Uniform Appeal Letter(11/17/2006) Foml No.M-IN-1 Agwft Nepal-W Page 4 Book Page I I STEERING COMMITTEE MeeOng Date To etl.of Dir. 01 29/07 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number — _ 8(b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Robert Ghirelli, Assistant General Manager SUBJECT: Design-build Legislation GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Direct staff to continue monitoring the political climate and negotiate with relevant parties re Design-build legislation. SUMMARY • The Board has directed staff to pursue Design-build authority from the Legislature. Two previous attempts in 2006 failed passage because of objections by labor unions. • This report is an update to the Steering Committee on recent staff actions and seeks additional direction based on current information. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS • November 15, 2006—Board of Directors adopted Legislative Goals for 2007. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In November, the Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) registered their objections over staffs discussions with the local unions and have gone so far as to write letters to every member of the Orange County Legislative Delegation asking them not to support or carry any design-build bill because of their perception that it discriminate against non-union contractors. Concurrently, the local International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) has asked that the District adopt contracting requirements related to training of electrical and mechanical workers. Caught in the middle Between the allegations of favoring the unions put forth by ABC and the additional training requirements being pushed by the local IBEW, OCSD Is caught between two opposing forces that have nothing to do with the substance or intent of a bill seeking design-build authority. The Board was given an analysis of ABC's objections last month Foml No,M 102-1 P da Repwl-X ReNfeo.01N 07 Page 1 Book Page 12 As of the writing of this report, the local IBEW stated that they desire the contracting requirements of 70 percent of journeyman electrical and mechanical workers complete a state- approved apprenticeship program be applied across the board to all OCSD projects over $200,000. While having contracted labor comply with this requirement is not necessarily a bad idea, staff has reviewed the proposal and its implementation across all projects carries several limitations. The practical limits of labor's request Until a few weeks ago, there has been confusion about exactly what the local IBEW requested and to what extent the contracting requirements should be implemented. The questions centered on the threshold of the requirements (whether there was a dollar limit or they would be applied across the board to most projects). When this confusion was cleared and staff understood that the IBEW desired the requirements across all projects we discussed the implications and limits such a requirement. If the apprenticeship requirements were applied to all projects (rather than those over$10 million)the impact to OCSD would be significant. Again,while the proposed requirements do have merit, the result would be to limit the number of qualified contractors who could bid on projects, especially the smaller-dollar contracts. These requirements would also increase the staff and time needed to monitor contractors to ensure compliance. With staff already facing challenges finding qualified contractors to bid on projects, additional requirements would only exacerbate the situation and possibly further limit the number of bidders. Moreover, the proposed apprenticeship requirements are over and above what is already being done by staff and current practices follow or exceed all state laws and requirements. OCSD also has a very good safety record with our current requirements. In short, the implications of implementing the requirements requested by labor are that the costs would likely exceed any time or monetary benefit of utilizing design-build specifications and the prospect of limiting and already narrow field of possible contractors would not be a wise public policy decision. What's next? Staff will continue to seek possible solutions and work towards passing a bill granting design- build authority; however, the Steering Committee should be prepared to abandon our efforts to seek a design-build bill. If seeking this authority means that staff must implement the training requirements across all projects (as requested by IBEW)the tradeoffs are not worth it for the few projects that would be eligible for design-build specifications. Staff recommends that the Steering Committee allow ongoing monitoring of the situation and coordination with the lobbying team for potential solutions. The staff contact for this issue is Michael Gold, Legislative Affairs Liaison, (714) 593-7529. RG:mg Form N0.M-IM-1 RexieL 01N 7 Page 2 Book Page 13 STEERING COMMITTEE M-1n,Dale TOBU.ufDr. 0112,107 01/24/07 AGENDA REPORT Rem Nurnbu Item Number 9( Orange County Sanitation District FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-60 — LEMON HEIGHTS ANNEXATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Information Only SUMMARY • Staff will be requesting to annex a total of 64.37 acres to the OCSD at tonight's Board of Directors meeting. By annexing this entire area to OCSD, administrative cost per property owner will be reduced by approximately $4,000 when they connect to a public sewer in the future. • The 70 properties in this annexation will pay their portion of the annexation and connection fees when they request a connection to the OCSD sewer facilities. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS A staff report was given at the October 2006 Steering Committee for the proposed annexation of this area. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OCSD will pay approximately $26,000 up front for annexation processing fees, staff labor, and legal documentation. These costs will to be reimbursed by the property owners when the owners conned to a sewer. The estimated annexation and sewer connection fees to be collected from the property owners in the future is approximately $605,000. This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 40). Form No ow,w, Ma,a+Fepm-5C Rexe•]:Otg6V] Page 1 Book Page 14 �IrtRING COMMITTEE M, IM908b Toe, ,ro,, AGENDA REPORT em Number Item Number 9(b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Gail Garrett, Committee Secretary SUBJECT: February Agenda Items for Consideration by Working Committees GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Review with staff the agenda items tentatively scheduled for review by the Working Committees in February. SUMMARY Staff routinely prepares for the Steering Committee a list of items scheduled for presentation to the Working Committees and the Board at their next monthly meetings. This allows the Steering Committee the opportunity to review these items early enough to make reassignments in the review or approval process. The following items are scheduled to be considered by the Committees in February: F&A Committee: 1. Consider Refinancing of the OCSD 1993 bonds 2. Consider Insurance Broker of Record Selection Process 3. Report on 2007-08 Budget Update Assumptions E&O Committee: 1. Ratify Change Order No. 22 for Job Number 1-2-4, Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation 2. Approve PS Job Number J-33-3, Power Monitoring and Control at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 3. Approve Amendment No. 3 for Construction Support Services for Job Number P2-90,Trickling Filters at Plant No. 2 4. Approve Amendment No. 1 to PSA for Contract Number 2.68, Rehabilitation of District Siphons 5. Approve Amendment No. 3 to PSA for PSA-2003-176, Surveying Services with MDS Consulting 6. Increase the Construction Budget for Contract Number 3-52, Rehabilitation of Westside Pump Station 7. Increase the Construction Budget for Contract Number 7-47, Rehabilitation of College Avenue Pump Station PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS N/A — Not a project. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A 99 Book Page 15 STEERING COMMITTEE Meeang Date To ad.of Dr. trzaroT AGENDA REPORT em Number Item Number 9(0 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Gail Garrett, Committee Secretary SUBJECT: Agenda Items for Consideration by the Board GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Review with staff the agenda items tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Board at its February 28, 2007 meeting. SUMMARY Staff routinely prepares for the Steering Committee lists of items scheduled for presentation to the Working Committees and the Board at their monthly meetings. This allows the Steering Committee the opportunity to review these items and make reassignments in the review or approval process. The following items are scheduled to be considered by the Board at the February 28, 2007 meeting: CONSENTCALENDAR 8. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. Order the minutes for the regular meeting held on December 20, 2006, to be filed and deemed approved, as mailed. b. (1)Authorize staff to annex 64.37 acres to Orange County Sanitation District in the vicinity of La Vereda Drive, Skyline Drive and Lemon Heights Drive, in an unincorporated area of Orange County; (2)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 07-01, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-60—Lemon Heights Annexation); and, (3) Defer collection of associated fees for proposed Annexation No. OCSD-60— Lemon Heights Annexation until a sewer connection is permitted. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR C. Consideration of Items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. _ ,r_ Book Page 16 COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 9. STEERING COMMITTEE Consent Calendar a. Order draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 20, 2006, to be filed. Non-Consent Calendar b. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 10. FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE (F &A) F &A Consent Calendar a. Order draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the special meeting held on January 3, 2007, to be filed. F&A Non-Consent Calendar b. Consideration of items deleted from F &A Consent Calendar, if any. 11. GWR SYSTEM STEERING COMMITTEE (GWRSSC) GWRSSC Consent Calendar a. Order Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 11, 2006, to be filed. GWRSSC Non-Consent Calendar b. Consideration of items deleted from GWRSSC Consent Calendar, if any. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 12. (1)Approve Plans and Specifications for Plant No. 1 HR Building Fire Lane Access and Additional Parking, Job No. FE05-17R, on file at the office of the Clerk of the Board; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation; (3)Award a construction contract to Green Giant Landscape, Inc. for Plant No. 1 HR Building Fire Lane Access and Additional Parking, Job No. FE05-17R,for an amount not to exceed $412,000; and, (4)Approve a 5% contingency($20,600). 13. Closed Session H:Wrptrr d3Com,rvnee5lteenn9 Commdeer2WM,rndaW1W.013407 etc)u>i aAft for ion m er.da Hm., 11,,07 Page 2 Book Page 17 PRIOR COMM ITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS N/A ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NIA 99 MbcGM�BKA llPRol91 qC'tloo1200MgO V I W otlao>%c)Wt W P for Ant nda 111107 Page 3 Book Page IS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (714) 962-2411 www.ocsd.com Mailing Address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Street Address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 a January 15, 2007 STAFF REPORT TO: Chair and Members of Steering Committee Orange County Sanitation District FROM: James D. Ruth General Manager SUBJECT: Legislative, Political and Policy Update The Word from Washington Eric Sapirstein, ENS Resources John Freshman,Troutman Sanders Public Affairs Group The House and Senate convened the 110th Congress on January 4, 2007, ushering in Democratic control of both chambers for the first time in twelve years. The final tally is 51.49 in the Senate and 233- 202 in the House. The first order of business in the House involves the passage of several legislative initiatives during the first hundred hours of the session, as identified by Speaker Pelosi, none of which are items of particular priority to OCSD. The most intently watched matter during this time is ethics reform. As approved, the House has banned all gift giving and paid travel by lobbyists; however then: is still a bit of ambiguity as to what it all means. The precise language banning such actions applies to private entities and registered lobbyists, but it is unclear whether public agencies will also be prohibited from paying for congressional travel expenses to visit public facilities, for example. The Senate, led by Harry Reid of Nevada, plans to implement its own ethics reforms, but is not expected to conclude action for a couple of weeks. Prospects for Legislative Initiatives Brightens The new Congress is expected to make program oversight one of its chief functions, including review of federal domestic spending programs and defense spending. According to Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman James Oberstar(D-MN), Congress must reassert itself and perform its oversight role to ensure that the Executive Branch carries out congressional policy. Oberstar and the likely chair of the Water Resource and Environment subcommittee, Edie Bernice Johnson (D-TX) are expected to scrutinize the manner in which EPA officials have enforced Clean Water Act programs as well as the way in which the agency has developed rules and guidance governing the water quality programs. Prospects for a general renewal of the Clean Water Act, last renewed in 1987, remain cloudy. The razor thin Senate majority could pose insurmountable obstacles to passage of any general rewrite. However, the House with its thirty-one seat majority may witness legislative debate over a piecemeal update of the law,with a focus on matters such as endocrine disruptors, the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act on wetlands, POTW plant security, NPDES permits for water transfers, and other policy issues that were not part of the clean water lexicon twenty years ago. DDSD . P.D.Boa 8127 4 FounWin vaueya 9272"127 . (714)9e2-2411 Chair and Members of Steering Committee �- January 15, 2007 Page 2 Similarly, in the Senate, Senator Barbara Boxer's assumption of the chairmanship of the Committee on Environment and Public Works means that a strong proponent of water quality programs is in place to shed light on the way in which EPA and the Office of Management and Budget have complied with federal laws. Boxer has identified her key priorities to be: • climate change, child health and • infrastructure. One area that may evolve as a key concern for the Senate committee is coastal water protection. Over the past several years, Boxer has sponsored efforts to rewrite existing laws to, among other things, direct the National Marine Fisheries Service to develop and enforce marine TMDLs. A second piece of unfinished water business is reauthorization of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA). WRDA includes a number of water resource and water quality- related programs funded through the Corps of Engineers. The House and Senate came close to final agreement on a bill in December, and both House and Senate WRDA leaders have indicated their desire to move a bill expeditiously to the President for signing. Indeed, Senator Boxer plans to convene hearings beginning mid-February on WRDA. At the end of last year's session, OCSD's request to increase the authorization on the Santa Ana Mainstem Project for the SARI line was held up because WRDA was not passed. The fiscal year 2008 budget will require a substantial amount of Congress' attention. Several years of budgets scaling back EPA program funding and Congress' decision not to pass final 2007 budgets means pressure will be extreme to reorder EPA(and other agencies) program budgets. Most budget observers expect the President's budget which will be presented to Congress on February 5,will be dead on arrival. There is an expectation that there will be no real growth in overall spending and the Democratic Congress will attempt to reverse the decline in domestic spending. A major change to the budget debate is the reinstatement of the"pay as you go" rule. "Pay go", as it is commonly referred to, requires that Congress not increase the budget deficit when enacting new programs. New programs and spending would require spending reductions (offsets) in existing program spending. This mandate could seriously hamper efforts to revise the Clean Water Act and other water resources policies unless Congress were to roll back tax benefits for the oil industry, for example, or enact other measures to yield significant budgetary savings. New Congress Ushers in Old Bulls and Young Turks; California Benefits The November elections created a new leadership regime that, although a little grayer,were in the majority twelve years ago when Congress shifted to Republican control. Representative George Miller(D-CA)will chair the powerful Committee on Education and Labor with its ability to impact federal workplace mandates such as OSHA. Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA)will preside over the key House committee tasked with investigations into how the Executive Branch implements congressional policy, including environmental mandates. Of course, California's Nancy Pelosi will set the tone for the House as the Speaker. A host of new faces from California will also influence the direction of the House. Members Ellen Tauscher and Grace Napolitano to name a few Californians are expected to 6 Chair and Members of Steering Committee January 15, 2007 i Page 3 provide critical leadership roles during the 11 Oth Congress on matters affecting water quality. Additionally a number of California's congressional delegation have been appointed to key committees including the Committees on Appropriations and Transportation and Infrastructure. In the Senate, Senator Boxer becomes the key Senator for environmental policy as she wields the gavel at the environment committee. Senator Dianne Feinstein assumes the chairmanship of the Subcommittee on Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations. In this role, Senator Feinstein will guide the setting of spending priorities for EPA and many of the programs at the Department of the Interior affecting water quality and water supply. In this role, Feinstein will be in a unique position to work to ensure California's environmental needs, including infrastructure, are addressed during a period of tremendous competition for limited federal program assistance. The Stuff from Sacramento Heather Dion, Sean Fitzgerald and Chris Townsend, Townsend Public Affairs Scott Baugh and Holly Fraumeni, Platinum Advisors The 2007-08 legislative sessions begins This month,the largest group of new legislators joined their veteran colleagues in Sacramento to begin the legislative session. Orange County has a whole new crop of legislators, most coming from local government, including Mike Duvall, Tony Mendoza, Jim Silva and Jose Solorio in the Assembly and Lou Correa and Mark Wyland in the Senate. Bills for the new session must be introduced by February 23,which means the next month will be relatively quiet as legislators find their way around the Capitol, hire staff and initiate legislation. Bills must clear their first policy committee by May 11. Unlike Congress, the composition of the California Legislature has not changed significantly in terms of party control. On the Democratic side, Fabian Nunez and Don Perata will continue to lead the Assembly and Senate, while Dick Ackerman remains the Senate Minority Leader. The House Republicans have elected a new Minority Leader, Michael Villines (from Fresno). Governor Schwarzenegger announces bold legislative goals with his budget The Governor did not waste any time on what he calls his"post-partisan" agenda putting forth a series of bold proposals that weave from left to right in their approach. Running the gamut of issues from health care to global warming and infrastructure,the$143.4 billion plan also wipes out the budget deficit and proposes new borrowing. Both Democrats and Republicans are cool to the Governor's budget, and some have been saying the proposal to eliminate the deficit relies on overly optimistic revenue expectations; however, given Schwarzenegger's landslide victory and current high popularity there is a chance that his proposals may see light. In February, the Governor's chief deputy director will be brief the Board on some key proposals of concern to the District. Chair and Members of Steering Committee January 15, 2007 , Page 4 K What we can expect from this year's legislative session The 2006 Legislative session was one of the most productive in recent memory, with the Governor and Legislators agreeing on a historic package of bond measures and completing the budget on time. Whether the good will generated from last year's session continues is anyone's guess; however there are a number of items that will be heavily discussed and of importance to the District: • Implementation of the Water and infrastructure Bonds Propositions 1 E and 84 will need trailer bills to implement them and authorize the various agencies to spend the money approved by the voters. The Governor has called for an open process requesting that legislators not carve up the measures and earmark the dollars. Bond implementation is listed as one of staff's top goals for the year so we will be keeping the Board informed about our progress. • Global Warming and Climate Change Initiatives The much-publicized global warming initiative that the Governor signed Into law will also be Implemented this year and because it could have significant impacts on OCSD (sewage treatment plants emit carbon dioxide) staff will also track this bill as part of its 2007 goals. Staff attendance at CASA legislative committee meetings On January 18-19 staff attended the California Association of Sanitary Agencies' legislative meetings as part of their annual conference. Any items of significance or interest to the Board will be reported at the meeting. JDR:mg H1depOgmo\1101GM I-eginadve Affairs\011507 Monthly Legislative Report.doc • ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT • Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins, President 1120 N. Armando Street Anaheim, CA 92806 INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT NO. 2.1-079 September 12, 2006 r TABLE OF CONTENTS r Section Title Paee r 1. Summary 2 II. Legal Authority 3 r III. Background 3 IV. Discharge Violations 4 V. Basis for Enforcement Actions 8 r VI. Recommendation 9 r Exhibits r A Industrial Wastewater Discharge Class I Permit No. 2-1-079 Industrial Wastewater Discharge Class 1 Permit Application r B Photograph of the Designated Sample Point C Past Due Invoices and Correspondence r D Notices of Violation and Wastewater Analysis Reports E Enforcement Correspondence F Photographs of the bypass pump,piping, and the bypass discharge standpipe G Order to Cease Violation of Industrial Wastewater Permit Conditions, March 23, 2006 r r r r r r I. SUMMARY r Hawk Industrial Uniform,located at 1120 N.Armando Street,Anaheim,California,is an industrial laundry that rents and washes soiled uniforms,floor mats, dust mops, gloves, and shop towels. Hawk Industrial Uniform also dyes and bleaches new shop towels and other materials. After washing, the items are dried, ironed as r necessary, sorted, and returned to the respective clients. Rusty Hawkins, as President and owner, is responsible for the operations and industrial wastewater discharge activities at Hawk Industrial Uniform at all material times referred to in this Complaint. r The Orange County Sanitation District(District)initially issued Class I Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-1-079 to Hawk Industrial Uniform in May 1994. Peril No. 2-1-079 contains discharge limits and r standard conditions that comply with the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations, Ordinance No.OCSU- 01 (Ordinance). w Since the initial permit issuance in May 1994, Hawk Industrial Uniform has had several major violations of its permitted Total Toxic Organic (TTO) and oil & Grease (O&G) limits. Compliance meetings to address the discharge violations were held in February 2000; February 2004; and August 2004. The causes of the r discharge violation were discussed and identified to be the laundering of shop towels laden with solvents and oils. Compliance orders to cease noncompliant discharges were also issued in January and July 2004. Hawk Industrial Uniform's response was limited to terminating its customer accounts thought to be the source of the TTO and O&G discharge violations. Since the corrective measures taken by Hawk Industrial Uniform failed to correct the discharge violations,in September 2004,the District required the company to install a pretreatment system to treat its wastewater prior to discharge to the District's sewer system. In October 2004, Rusty Hawkins informed the District by letter that,due to inadequate existing electrical service and City of Anaheim requirements, he could not commit to any specific dates for installation of a pretreatment system. Following Hawk Industrial Uniform's failure to install a pretreatment system, in May 2005, the District advised Hawk Industrial Uniform that the District will continue to monitor Hawk Industrial Uniform's discharge and,if another violation occurs,the District will escalate enforcement action. Although Hawk Industrial Undorm continued to r wash shop towels,and despite continuing to operate without a pretreatment system,all of the onsite samples collected between January 2005 and March 2006 (with the exception of one TTO discharge violation in October 2005), were in compliance. W On March 16,2006,the District inspected Hawk's facility and discovered that the wastewater discharged from washing machines used to launder shop towels was pumped through a pipe which discharged directly r to a manhole in the street, thereby bypassing the designated sample box at the end of the underground clarifier. Based on the configuration of the piping relative to the clarifier,the District concluded that Hawk Industrial Uniform has avoided representafive sampling, and thus aHered the monitoring data, by bypassing the District's designated sample point stated in its Permit No.2-1-079. Bypass of industrial wastewater and altering monitoring data constitutes a violation of Sections 501.4 and 604.A.4 of the District's Ordinance and Section II.A.2 and III.E of Hawk Industrial Uniform's discharge permit. Hawk v Industrial Uniform's permit also states that knowingly making any false statement on any report or other document required by this permit or knowingly rendering any monitoring device or method inaccurate is a crime and may result in the imposition of criminal sanctions and/or civil penalties. r Furthermore, as of September 12, 2006, Hawk Industrial Uniform owes the District the sum of$96,569.63. The oldest invoices are now 271 days past due. Other than the recent permit renewal fee of$1570.00,the r 2 EHawk Adminstra6re CompIW0912DVINA1! last payment received was on August 1, 2005 for the 2004105 0 quarter invoice. Pursuant to the authority of California Government Code Sections 54739 at seq., the Clean Water Act(33 U.S.C. Section 1251 at seq.), Sections 604.A.4,604.A.9, and 615.D of the District's Ordinance,the District's staff recommends imposition of a thirty (30) day permit suspension and assessment of administrative W penalties in the amount of Forty-five Thousand Dollars($45,000.00),and user charges,annual invoices, penalties and finance charges due in the amount of Ninety-Six Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Nine 631100 Dollars($96,569.63),jointly and severally on Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins for violations r of Permit No. 2-1-079 and the District's Ordinance. The permit suspension shall continue for a minimum of thirty(30)days, and unfit the total amount of One Hundred Forty-One Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Nine 631100 Dollars($141,569.63)is received,and until all the necessary pretreatment equipment to fully ensure long-term compliance is in place and operational. An administrative hearing will be held on October 24,2006 at 10:00 a.m.at the Administrative Office located at 10644 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley to provide Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins an opportunity to respond to the District's evidence and to be given an opportunity to present evidence as to why the District should not suspend Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit and impose administrative penalties as set forth herein. W if. LEGAL AUTHORITY Pursuant to California Government Codes 54739 at seq., the Clean Water Act(33 U.S.C. Section 1251 at seq.), and Sections 604.A.4, 604.A.9, and 615.1)of the District's Ordinance,the District has the authority to suspend a permit and assess administrative penalties for violations of the District's Ordinance and any permit condition,prohibition,or effluent limits. The suspension and administrative penalties recommended herein are based on the violations of the District's Ordinance as stated in Part 111,E of Hawk Industrial Uniform's Permit " No. 2-1-079. III. BACKGROUND v A. Regulations and Facts Applicable to Hawk Industrial Uniform 1. Hawk Industrial Uniform is an industrial laundry that rents and washes soiled uniforms,floor mats,dust mops, gloves, and shop towels. Hawk Industrial Uniform also dyes and bleaches new shop towels and other materials. After washing,the items are dried,ironed as necessary,sorted,and returned to the respective clients. r 2. Hawk Industrial Uniform's wastewater-generating operations include wastewater from the washing, dyeing,and rinsing processes. In addition to wastewater from laundering and dyeing operations,the facility discharges brine from the water-softening system through a three-stage underground clarifier. 3. Hawk Industrial Uniform is a"Significant Industrial User"as defined by Part403.3(t),Section 40,of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Code of Federal Regulations,and was first issued a Class I permit (Permit No. 2-1-079) to discharge industrial wastewater in May 1994. At the time of permit issuance, Hawk Industrial Uniform was classified as an industrial laundry subject to the '� 3 MH"kAdminstrap+e Comp%int 091206FINAM r r provisions of the District's Ordinance and the local limits contained therein. r 4. In May 2006,the District last renewed Permit No.2-1-079 with a permitted flow base of 23,000 gallons per day. A copy of the permit is presented in Exhibit A. r 5. Hawk Industrial Uniform has no pretreatment system. 6. Hawk Industrial Unfforn's Permit No. 2-1-079 stales, on page 2 under'Sampling Point Location", 'The sample point is a sample box and represents all industrial wastewater discharge from the facility.' Both Hawk Industrial Uniform and the District have used this sample point for monitoring purposes since Permit No.2-1-079 was first issued in May1994. A copy of the photograph of the sample box is presented in Exhibit B. 7. As of September 12,2006, Hawk Industrial Uniform owes the District$96,569.63. Specifically, this is the sum of$48,701.84 in quarterly invoices for user charges,$32,614.57 in annual invoices, and $15,253.22 in penalties and finance charges. Other than the$1570.00 permit renewal fee,the last payment received was on August 1,2005 for the 2004/05 41^quarter invoice. The oldest invoices are now 271 days past due. Copies of the invoices due and late notices are presented in Exhibit C. 8. Rusty Hawkins as President and owner has been the person responsible for operations at Hawk Industrial Uniform at all material times referred to in this Complaint. His responsibilities include overseeing on a daily basis Hawk Industrial Uniform's operations and industrial wastewaterdischarge activities. He is also responsible for ensuring compliance with Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit conditions. A copy of Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit application signed by Rusty Hawkins is r presented in Exhibit A. IV. DISCHARGE VIOLATIONS J The following describes Hawk Industrial Uniform's violations and enforcement history from the time the permit was first issued. r 1. As shown in Table 1 on the following page, since the initial permit issuance in May 1994, Hawk Industrial Uniform has had the following discharge violations of its permitted Total Toxic Organic(TTO) and Oil&Grease(08G)limits: r r d 4 Hawk REminsoaM ComDleiM091206FIWlM r Table 1 Onsite Sampling Violations "I Date Sample Type Constituent Concentration Over Limit Over Limit Violation Type ling/0 m W 0911911994 Grab 5-2 O&G 285.00 85.00 43 Major 11/1811994 Grab 2 Tr0 2.04 1.46 252 Maor 09/11/1996 Grab 2 TTO 1.70 1.12 193 Major 102411996 Grab 2 TTO 5.04 4.46 769 M 'or 09110/1998 Grab 2 0&G 301.00 101.00 51 Major 01/26/1999 Grab 2 TTO 88.32 87.74 15128 Major .r 0112611999 Grab 2 0&G 940.00 740.00 1 370 Major 09/0911999 Grab 2 TTO 1.50 0.92 159 Major 09MI999 Grab 2 0&G 254.00 54.00 27 Major 11/30/1999 Com Ile 2C O&G 348.00 148.00 74 Major 0502003 Grab 2 TTO 12.27 11.69 2016 Major 122312003 Grab 2 TTO 15.74 15.16 2614 M or 0527/2004 Grab 2 TTO 65.77 65.19 11240 Major 05/272004 Grab 2 O&G 318.00 118.00 59 Malar 121132004 Com osile 5-2C TTO 0.69 0.11 19 Minor 1025/2005 Grab 121 TT 0 1.80 1.22 210 Maor Copies of the Notices of Violation and Wastewater Analysis Reports for the above-mentioned discharge violations are presented in Exhibit D. v 2. Compliance meetings to address the discharge violations were held between Hawk Industrial Uniform and the District on February 16, 2000; February 11, 2004; and August 23, 2004. Orders to Cease Noncompliant Discharge were issued on January 21, 2004 and July 27, 2004. Hawk Industrial r Uniform's response was limited to terminating the customer accounts thought to be the source of the TTO and 0&G discharge violations, and instructing drivers to reject unacceptable loads. The violations recurred in spite of these claims of corrective measures. Therefore, in a letter dated r September 24,2004,the District required Hawk Industrial Uniform to install a pretreatment system and submit a schedule for the installation to the District. In a response letter dated October 27, 20D4, Hawk Industrial Uniform stated that due to inadequate existing electrical service and City of Anaheim wd requirements, they couldn't commit to any specific dates for installation of a pretreatment system. Therefore, Hawk Industital Uniform failed to fulfill its commitment to a dale for Completion of pretreatment system installation to resolve the discharge violations on a long-term basis. Copies of the correspondence is presented in Exhibit E. 3. Following Hawk Industrial Uniform's failure to install a pretreatment system, on May 27, 2005, the District sent a compliance status review letter advising Hawk Industrial Uniform of its failure to ensure long-term compliance with discharge limits. Furthermore,the District advised Hawk Industrial Uniform that the District will continue to monitor Hawk Industrial Uniform's discharge,and if another violation occurs,the District will escalate enforcement action. Although Hawk Industrial Uniform continued to wash shop towels and despite continuing to operate without a pretreatment system, 39 of 40 onsite samples collected between January 2005 and March 2006 were in compliance. The sole exception '� 5 aNawk Aammktra&e Complam1091206FINAM r was a TTO discharge violation in October 2005. 4. On March 16,2006, the District inspected Hawk's facility and discovered that the wastewater from washing machines used to launder shop towels discharged via a trench to a sump, bypassing the designated sample point described in Permit No.2-"79. Asubmersible pump in the sump pumped this wastewater through a subterranean pipe,which re-emerged underneath, and was hidden by,a sink on the north wall of the facility. The pipe subsequently penetrated the wall and ran alongside the building,where it discharged to a standpipe. The standpipe discharged directly to a manhole in the W street,entirely bypassing the underground clartfier and the designated sample point. A diagram of the bypass plumbing and designated sample point are shown in Figure 1 on the following page. Photos of the corresponding locations are presented in Exhibit F. r 5. On March 16,2006,the pump serving the bypass was ordered to be removed from the sump,piping connections severed,and the bypass discharge standpipe outside the building capped. The photos r are included as Exhibit F. On March 23,2006,the District issued another Order to Cease Violation of Industrial Wastewater Permit Conditions. A copy of the order is presented as Exhibit G. 6. Sampling conducted at Hawk Industrial Uniform following the removal of the bypass resulted in discharge violations of 50%of all samples subsequently collected(7 of 14 samples), as described in Table 2 below. 7. The magnitude and frequency of the TTO and oil and grease violations following termination of the bypass line suggest that Hawk Industrial Uniform's industrial wastewater discharge would have been r in frequent and significant noncompliance without the bypass. 8. Based on the configuration of the piping bypassing the designated sample point and non-technically r based discharge compliance of over 97%(39 of40 samples),between January 2005 and March 2006, the District concluded that Hawk Industrial Uniform attempted to avoid representative sampling,and thus alter the monitoring data,by bypassing the designated sample point. Table 2 Subsequent Onsite Sampling Violations r Date Sample Type Constituent Concentration Over Limit Over Limit wolaaon Type m m 05/10/2006 Grab(2) TTO 1.64 1.06 183 Maim 0523I2006 Grab(2) TTO 11.38 10.80 1862 Major 0512312006 Grab(2) O&G 621.70 421.70 211 Major 05124/2006 Grab(2) TTO 4.27 3.69 636 Major 051242006 Grab(2) O&G 487.10 287.10 144 Major OW52006 Grab(2) TTO 2.91 2.33 402 Major 07/102006 Grab(2) TTO 1.09 0.51 88 Major r r "� 6 NHaM Administrative Complaint 091206FINALM FIGURE 1 .+ Diagram of Hawk Industrial Uniform Bypass Plumbing (not drawn to scale) ri HAWK YF'RD WA"'feWAAM BUILDING INTERIOR W suewffBSmlF vane ]-STAU6 I.j uNDmanouxD AuoT]Dn CLABbffR WASTflFRIflI BFSI@IAIF➢SAnW18 PDINr WASIEWAT00. CWlEC110N SMff W ♦.• ..• ..V � PPAA1Tm PIPMG IUNDeRDRDUND/ BTPN9P@MC• (ABOVEDWUPIDI W STANDPIPE W W BIPNSPDMD (BPJAW DRDuxDI W ARMANOD STREET � MMIIOLE t.................'...."""'. ARMANDO STREET 7 OHM AdMbO MCumBIBIRIW1209FINAL0 V. BASIS FOR ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS The District's staff recommends suspension of Hawk Industrial Uniform's wastewater discharge permit and imposition of administrative penalties on Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins,and each ofthem,based y on the following: A. Frequency of Violations W Between January 2005 and March 2006,with an exception of one TTO discharge violation in October 2005, over 97% of all other onsite samples (39 of 40 samples) collected were in compliance. However,since discovery and termination of the bypass on March 16,2006,the results of sampling conducted between May 10, 2006, and July 10, 2006, indicate that 500A of the samples(7 of the 14 samples collected)were in noncompliance. B. Magnitude of Violations The magnitude and frequency of the TTO and 0&G violations following termination of the bypass line suggest the Hawk Industrial Uniform's industrial wastewater discharge would seldom have been in compliance without the bypass. Concentrations of constituents in violation are as high as 15,000% r over the 0.58 mg4 TTO discharge limit,and as high as 3700/6over the 200.0 mg/I oil and grease limit. C. Altering Monitoring Data Bypass of industrial wastewater and altering monitoring data constitutes a violation of Sections 501.4 and 604.A.4 of the District's Ordinance and Section II.A.2 and IILE of Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit. Part III.E of Permit No. 2-"79 states that knowingly rendering any monitoring device or method inaccurate is a crime and may result in the imposition of criminal sanctions and/or civil penalties. D. Impact of Violations on the District's Wastewater Collection and Treatment System Discharge of high levels of Total Toxic Organics and oil and grease, alone or collectively, has the potential to cause pass through that in turn may cause the District to violate its own NPDES permit discharge limit. This can also cause adverse effects including harts to the public health and environment,and contamination of wastewater and biosolids. Oil and grease accumulation in sewer v lines is also the primary cause of Sanitary Sewer Overflows(SSO). E. Failure to pay amounts owed to the District Section 604.A.8 of the District's Ordinance specifies that a permit may be suspended when it is determined that a permiltee does not make fimely payment of all amounts owed to the Districtfor user charges, non-compliance sampling fees, permit fees, or any other fees imposed pursuant to the Ordinance. To date, Hawk Industrial Uniform owes the District the sum of$96,569.63 for failure to fulfill its financial obligations to pay the invoices and late charges for the use of the District's facilities. W 8 KHmk AdminsbaWe Complainl091206FINALS y VI. RECOMMENDATION On March 16, 2006, the District discovered that the wastewater discharged from washing machines used to launder shop towels was pumped through a pipe which discharged directly to a manhole in Armando Street, thereby bypassing the sample box at the end of the underground clarifier. The District concluded that Hawk Industrial Uniform avoided representative sampling, and thus altered the monitoring data,by bypassing the designated sample point described in its Permit No.2-1-079. Bypass of industrial wastewater and altering monitoring data constitutes a violation of Sections 501.4 and 604.A.4 of the W District's Ordinance and Section II.A.2 and III.E of Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit. Part III.E of the permit slates that knowingly making any false statement on any report or other document required by this permit or knowingly rendering any monitoring device or method inaccurate,is a crime and may result in the imposition of criminal sanctions and/or civil penalties. District staff recommends a minimum thirty(30)day permit suspension of Permit No. 2-1-079,and an administrative penalty of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000)for this violation. In addition, pursuant to California Government Code Section 54740.5 and Section 615.D.7.c of the District's Ordinance, administrative penalties may also be assessed in an amount not to exceed five .0 thousand dollars ($5,000.00) per violation for each day in violation of any permit condition or requirement issued,reissued,or adopted by the District. For the six(6)TTO and two(2)oil &grease violations detected during onsite sampling conducted since October 2005, the recommended additional administrative penalty is Forty Thousand Dollars($40,000.00). Therefore, District staff recommends that a total administrative penalty of Forty-Five Thousand Dollars W ($45,000.00)be assessed against Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins,and each of them,for violation of the District's Ordinance and Permit No. 2-1-079. In conclusion, pursuant to the authority of California Government Code Sections 54739 at seq., the Clean WaterAct(33 U.S.C.Section 1251 et seq.), Sections 604.A.4,604.A.9,and 615.D of the District's Ordinance, the District's staff recommends imposition of a thirty (30) day permit suspension and assessment of administrative penalties in the amount of Forty-Five Thousand Dollars($45,000.00);and usercharges, annual invoices, penalties and finance charges due in the amount of Ninety-Six Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Nine 631100 Dollars($96,569.63),jointly and severally on Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins for violations of Permit No 2-1-079 and the District's Ordinance. The permit suspension shall continue for a minimum of thirty(30) days, and until the total amount of One Hundred Forty-One Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Nine 631100 Dollars ($141,569.63) is received, and until all necessary pretreatment equipment is installed and operation to fully ensure long-term compliance. An administrative hearing will be held on October24,2006 at 10:00 a.m.at the District's Administrative Office located at 10844 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley to provide Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins an opportunity to respond to the District's evidence and to be given an opportunity to present evidence as to why the District should not suspend Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit and impose administrative penalties as set forth herein. r "� 9 MI Ad"Isnfin Cmn*l D912DBFINALM W EXHIBIT A Hawk Industrial Uniform Industrial Wastewater Discharge Class I Permit No. 2-1-079 Industrial Wastewater Discharge Class I Permit Application W MHawk FEm'vntha CompamtO91206FIMM J INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE CLASS I PERMIT Permit No: 2-1-079 FOR DISCHARGE OF WASTEWATER ISSUED BY ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT JIn accordance with the provisions of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations of Orange County Sanitation District, herein referred to as"District", JY HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. JANAHEIM, CA 92806 hereinafter referred to as"Pernittee", is hereby authorized to discharge industrial wastewatertrom the above identified facility into the District's sewer system in accordance with the conditions set forth in this permit. Such conditions are as specified in the following parts of this permit: Pait1 - Ealuent Limits and Flow Basis Pan2 - Monitoring,Notification,and Reporting Requirements Pait 3 - Standard Conditions Pan4 - Special Conditions IV Compliance with this permit does not relieve the Permittee of its obligation to comply with the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance No. OCSD-01), any applicable pretreatment regulations, standards or requirements under local,State,and Federal laws,including �r any such regulations,standards,requirements or laws that may become effective during the term of this permit. Noncompliance with any term or condition of this permit constitutes a violation of Ordinance No. OCSD-01. q This permit shall become effective on May 01, 2006 and shall expire on April 30, 2008, f Mahin Talebi t Source Control Manager Issued on August 10, 2006 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 9272MI27 (714) 962-2411 PART 1 • EFFLUENT LIMITS AND FLOW BASIS During the period from May 01,2006 to April 30,2008,Pennitlee Is authorized to discharge Industrial wastewater into the sewer system tributary to the Districts sewerage facilities. The effluent discharge shall not exceed either the following wncenerabon limits in mg/L or the mass emission rate limits in lbs/day,based on 23000 gallons per day(gpd)ofwestewaterflow althe sampling point. r Company Name: HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM Permit No.: 2.1-079 Effective Dale: 05MI2006 Sewer Address: Flow Base: 23000 gird Expiration Date: DIM 008 r' 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. Category INDUSTRIAL IAUNDRY Vill Percent Lose: 0 ANAHEIM,CA 92808 Subcategory, 403 WWVAR Fixed Loss: IS7 ...'OISCNARGE-.CIMIT3. CONSTITUENT Instantaneous DmBrL Illurut aDmg2� Ave Dally Meer Monthly lbalday rely rr ArMrdc 2.000 2.000 • • 0.3B4 BOD 1<' P .. •, a • 15D00 10000 CN(A) 1.000 1.000 • • 0,192 CN(T) S.00D 5.MO • • -.0.959 Cadmium 1.000 1.000 • IN 0.192 Chromium ' 2J00D 2.000. • .. • '0.384 •. w Copper 3.000 3.000 • • 0.575 _. .. . . .. Dissolved Sulfides _ -� <0.10 OSW- - • • 0.088 Lead 2.000 2.0D0 • • 0.384 `r Mercury DA36 0.036 • 111 Nickel 10.000 10.000 • • 1,918 CHI&Grease Min. 20DA06 200.000 . - • • '•I PCB 0.010 0.016 • • • • Pesticides Od110 ` 0.010 • •_ Silver 5.000 5.000 • IN 0.959 'r Total Sutfldes 3.dw : lial • • - 0.959 : r Total Toxic Organics 0,580 0.580 • • 0.111 zinc 10.000 10.000 . • : • 1.918. ` a pH 6-12 6-12 • • • F POINT LOCATION: Theabove effluent limits apply at the sampling point located outride near the bailer and water e sample point is a sample box and represents all industrial wastewater discharge from the facility. r Production-based limits or combined waste formula r Cyanide limits apply at the sampling point after cyanide treatment,but pnorto dllulion with other streams. If there is no cyanide treatment, the sample must be taken at the end of the cyanide process before dilution with other process streams. In the absence of cyanide process,the limits apply at the sampling point location described above(end of pipe). r r ..I HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM•PERMIT NO.21-079 Page 2 of 13 r I PART 2-SELF-MONITORING, NOTIFICATION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 1. SELF-MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Pennittee shall conduct monitoring of its own wastewater effluent for the purpose ofdetermining the status o(compliance/non- compliance and usercharges. Based on the results,Pennines shall make the necessary adjustments/corrections to bring the wastewater discharge into immediate compliance with its permitted limits. The specific requirements are as follows: A. Monitoring/Sampling Requirements From the effective date of the permit and until the permit is terminated or revised,Pernittee shall monitor its wastewater discharge for the following parameters at the indicated frequency': ��a , 04 Metals: None Cyanides: None Organics: 624 Quarterly Grab minimum of four(4)grab samples which must be inclividualh,analyzed Others: BOD Quarterly Composite Composite TSS Quarterly Composite Composite ., Oil&Grease Min. Quarterly Grab minimum of four(4)grab samples which may be combined by the laboratory personnel nor to analysis Flow(gal/day)' r Na 'NOTE: Toth.extant that special conditions in Pan 4 of this permit require more extensive salt monitoring,the special conditions shall apply. 'Sample type Is either mmposite or grab as defined in Ordinance No.OCSD-01 under Section 102. 'Flow and pH should be measureo concurrently with composite sampling for heavy metals. B. Representative Sampling and Laboratory Analyses Samples and measurements taken as required herein shall be representative of the volume and nature of the regulated industrial discharge during hours of production. All samples shall be taken at the sampling point location as designated in this permit. All equipment used for sampling and analysis must be routinely calibrated,inspected,and maintained to ensure Its accuracy. All sampling and laboratory analyses shall be conducted in accordance with Attachment A. HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM a PERMIT NO,21-079 Page 3 of 13 C. Frequency,Sampling Schedule and Due Dates for Submission of Reports Sampling of wastewater effluent and reporting of results shall be done In accordance with the schedule shown below. .: Sampling may be performed any day within the specified date range as designated in this permit. If sampling cannot be conducted within the specified date for any valld reason,the District must be notified in advance and in writing,of the mason(s)for the inability to sample and the new proposed sampling date. w 1. Quarterly and Sand-Annual Frequency Deadlines METALS - Sampling Data ;Repot Submission Dee Data Nona .. semplmgDato, Import&itimiealalDue.Dah�: Fourth Quarter (Apr 2006-Jun 2008) June 12-June 23 July 13,2006 First Quarter (Jul 2008-Sep 2006) September 11 -September 22 October 12,2006 Second Quarter (Oct 2006-Dec 2006) December 7-December 19 January 22.2007 Third Quarter (Jan 2007.Mar 2007) March 12-March 23 Apd112,2007 `r Fourth Quarter (Apr 2007-Jun 2007) June 11 -June 22 July 12,2007 First Quarter (Jul 2007-Sep 2007) September 10-September 21 October 11,2007 Second Quarter (Oct 2007-Dec 2007) December 10-December 21 January 15.2008 Third Quarter (Jan 2008-Mar 2000) March 10-March 21 April 10,2008 Fouts Quarter (Apr 2008-Jun 2008) June 9-June 20 July 10,2008 CYANIDES - Sampling,Ddhi' Report Submission Due Date r None OfiGANICB - 'Sampling:Date Report Submission Duo Oats � Fourth Quarter (Apr 2008-Jun 2006) June 12-June 23 July 13,2006 First Quarter (Jul 2008-Sep 2008) September 11 -September 22 October 12,2006 Second Quarter (Oct 2006-Dec 2006) December 7-December 19 January 22,2007 w Third Quarter (Jan 2007.Mar 2007) March 12-March 23 April 12.2007 Fourth Quarter (Apr 2007-Jun 2007) June 11 -June 22 July 12,2007 First Quarter Jul 2007-Sep 2007) September 10-September 21 October 11,2007 Second Quarter Oct 2007-Dec 2007) December 10-December 21 January 15,2008 Third Quarter (Jan 2008-Mar 2008) March 10-March 21 April 10.2008 Fourth Quarter (Apr 2008-Jun 2008) June 9-June 20 July 10.20M 011:8;GREASE Sampling Daft Report.slib""Slon Due Date' Fourth Quarter (Apr 2006-Jun 2006) June 12-June 23 July 13,2098 First Quarter (Jul 2008-Sep 2006) September 11 -September 22 October 12,2006 w Second Quarter (Oct 2006-Dec 2006) December 7-December 19 January 22.2007 Third Quarter (Jan 2007-Mar 2007) March 12-March 23 April 12,2007 Fourth Quarter (Apr 2007-Jun 2007) June 11 -June 22 July 12,2007 a First Quarter (Jul 2007-Sep 2007) September 10-September 21 October 11,2007 Second Quarter (Oct 2007-Dec 2007) December 10-December 21 January 15,2008 Third Quarter (Jan 2008-Mar 2008) Memh 10-March 21 April 10,20DS al Fouts Quarter (Apr 200E-Jun 2008) June 9-June 20 July 10,2008 2. Monthly,Weekly,and Daily Frequency Deadlines r a. Samples must be collected in accordance with the requirements specified in Part 2 Section A,as applicable. h. Depending on the self-monilodng frequency, sampling must be conducted In the following manner, as applicable: (I) Monthly Self-Monitoring A sample of the wastewater effluent shall be collected and analyzed a minimum of one(1)sampling day HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM a PERMIT NO.b1-079 Page 4 of 13 s✓ per month. The sampling day shall be related to the successively different plant operatlonal day during each month of monitoring. (If) Weekly Self-Monitoring y A sample of the wastewaterefguent shall be collected and analyzed a minimum of four(4)sampling days per month (once a week). The sampling day shall be related to the successively different plant operational day during each week of monitoring. (ill) Daily Self-Monitoring w A sample of the wastewater effluent shall be collected and analyzed each day of discharge each month. c. Reporting of monthly, weekly, and daily selFmomtoring results must be done on a monthly basis. Sel(- monitoring reports must be submitted by the twentieth(20th)day of the month following sampling. d W W W tlu W sl a ve �, HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM•PERMIT NO.&1-079 Page 5 of 13 T P D. Requirements for Reporting Results 1. Self-Monitoring Reports T Penntttee shall submit a Self-Monitoring Report(SMR)on the date(s)specified above.Monitoring results shall be summarized and reported on a District SMR form. The District will not accept formats other than what Is shown in the SMR form therefore,fors provided by the District or replicates must be used for reporting of results. Failure bo w receive the SMR forms does not relieve PerHtee from the obligation to perform the sett-monitoring and submit the report on the required date. The SMR for shall be completely filledout with copies of all laboratory results attached. The report shall indicate the concentration of all pollutants in the effluent forwhich sampling and analyses were performed, including water meter readings required for flow measurement if sampling performed by the perlttee Indicates a violation, the perMee shall notify the District within 24 hours of becoming aware of the violation. 2. Signatory Requirements P Prior to submittal of the SMR to the Distract,the results shall be verified and signed under penalty of perjury,by an authorized company otfiUal as defined In 40 CFR 403. T E. Additional Monitoring Requirements In Response to Non-compliance 1. Resompling r Upon submission of the SMR to the District by the required due date, the District will process the results for mess emission rate calculations,revlewthe concentration results,and notify Peri tee of the results. If the results indicate that violation of the applicable concentration and/or mess discharge limits has occurred,a Notice of Violation will r be issued and Peritle,must repeal the sampling and pollutant analyses of the required parameters,as specified by the District,within 30 days of issuance of the Notice of Violation. 2. Reporting a. The monitoring results shall be submitted within 20 days of completion of the resampling specified In E.1. b. The requirements for reporting results, as described in D.1 and D2, shall be followed for the additional monitoring requirements in response to non-compliance. Te F. Requirements for Reporting Results of Voluntary Self-Monttodng v 1. Any voluntary seff m nhoring sample of the effluent obtained during a 24-hour period from the representative sampling point locabon Identified in Part 1 of this permit that is collected and analyzed In accordance with the guidelines shown in Attachment A,consbarlSs a valid Semple. Results of the analysis for all valid samples shall be reported to the District,regardless of the outcome. r 2. Sett-monttodmg results for all valid samples must be submitted using an official numbered Voluntary Self-Monhorirg Report(VSMR)For and received by the District within 30 days from the day the sampling event was concluded. Pertttee shall obtain the official VSMR For from the District,with a unique trackingfidentifinbon number for each day of selFmonttoring. 3. The District will not consider VSMR Fors received after 30 days from the day the sampling event was concluded. Exoepbons to the 30-day submittal policy due to extenuating circumstances or special siwallons shall be authorized by the District's General Manager or his/her designee. 4. Upon submission of the completed VSMR For to the District by the required 30-day due date, the District will evaluate the sample results to determine compliance. If the results indicate first a violation of the applicable discharge limits has occurred, a notice of violation may be issued requiring P6"Atee to Implement conecbve measures. r M r HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM S PERMIT NO.2.1-079 Page 6 of 13 II. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS d A Permittee shall comply with the notification requirements set forth In Section 501 of Ordinance No.OCSD-01: 1. Notification of Spill and Slug Loading a. In the event Permlttee Is unable to tom I p y with any permit condition due to a breakdown of equipment, accidents,or human error,or Perrnitae has reasonable opportunity to know that his discharge will exceed the discharge provisions of the user's permit, Permitme shall immediately notify the District by telephone. If the material discharged to the sewer has the potential to cause or result in a fire or explosion hazard, Permit" shall immediately notify the local fire department and the District. to. Confirmation of this notification shall be made In writing no later than five(5)working days from the date of the incident The written notification shall state the date of the incident the reasons for the discharge or spill,what steps were taken to immediately correct the problem,and what steps ale being taken to prevent the problem from retuning. c. Such notification shall not relleve the userof any expense,Ion,damage or other liability which may be incurred +' as a result of damage or loss to the District or any other damage or loss to person or property;nor shall such notification relieve the user of any fees or other liability which may be imposed by a District's Ordinance or other applicable law. e 2. Notification of Bypass a. Bypass of Industrial wastewater to the sewer system is prohibited. The District may take enforcement action against the user, unless: a (i) Bypass was unavoidable because it was done to prevent lose of life,personal Injury,or severe property damage; ,a (it) There were no feasible allemativesto the bypass,such as the use of auxiliary bush,antfacilibes,retention of untreated wastes,elective slow-down or shut-down of production units ormalntenanoe during periods of production downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate backup equipment could have been feasibly installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred m during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventative maintenance;and, (ill) PerrnUtee submitted notices as required under 2.1b. b. If PermNee knows in advance of the need for a bypass,it shall submit a written request to at low the bypass to the District,if possible,at least ten(10)days before the date of the bypass. c. The District may approve an anticipated bypass at Its sole discretion after considering its adverse effects,and ,r the District determines that the conditions listed in 2.a.(W)are met. d. Families shall provide telephone notification to the District of an unanticipated bypass that exceeds its perrnitied discharge limits within four hours from the time Permlitee becomes aware of the bypass. A written a, report shall also be provided within five(5)days of the time Pennitee becomes aware or could masonab"ve been aware of the bypass. The report shall contain a description of the bypass and Its cause;the duration of the bypass,Including exact dales and times,and,If the bypass has Trot been contacted,the anticipated time it Is expected to continue;and steps taken or planned to reduce,eliminate,and prevent recurrence of the bypass. a Failure to submit oral notice or written report may be gmunds for permit revocation. B. Notification regarding Planned Changes VA Pennitlee shall notify the District 90 days in advance prior to any facility expansion, production increase, or process modifications which may result in new or substantially increased discharges or a change in the nature of the discharge. Permitee shall notify the District in writing of the proposed expansion and shall submit any information requested by the e, District for evaluation of the affect of such expansion on the Peooitee's discharge to the sewer system. hw HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM a PERMIT NO.21-079 Page 7 of 13 r III. OTHER REPORTING REQUIREMENTS „r A Slug Discharge Control Plan Pennifiee shall develop, maintain and implement in accordance with 40 CFR 403.8(f)(2Hv) a Slug Control Plan to respond to spills,emergency bypass and any accidental discharges that may result In a violation of any permit limits or conditions,or may significantly exceed the normal flow to the sewer system or pollutant loading. The plan shall conteln detailed procedures to be followed by permittee In responding to a slug discharge at the Penntttes's facility. The • procedures shell include provisions to eliminate endangerment of human health and safety by containmantand clean up of the slug discharge,and prevent any violation of Pennittee's discharge limits and the District's Wastewater Discharge r Regulations(Ordinances). The Plan shall also provide procedures and facilitate immediate notification of the District of slug discharge event. Penalties shall review and update the Slug Control Plan every two years. The Slug Discharge Control Plan,at a minimum,must contain the following: 1. Description of the permittee's sewer discharge practices including non-roufine batch discharges. n 2. Description of stored chemicals Including type and characteristic,volume,and chemical hazard classification. 3. Procedures to prevent slug discharges to the sewer system. 4. Description of equipment for responding to slug discharges. 5. Procedures for Inspection and maintenance of the chemical storage areas to assure proper daily handling. 6. A copy of an operation log sheet recording the maintenance performed,volume of spitl,and corrective measures _ taken. 7. Procedures for proper training of key personnel for handling slug discharges. S. Emergency telephone numbers for promptly reporting slug discharges to the appropriate governmental agencies. B. Waste Minimization Requirements r Upon request by the District,Families shall pmvide waste minlmlzatlon plans to conserve water,Investigate product _ substitution,provide inventory control,implement employee education,and other steps as necessary to minimize waste produced. ..r _ C. Water and Tax Bill Submittal Penalties shall submit to the District,copies of Water and Tax Bills within 30 days of recelpt of such bills. .d D. Changes In Company Information ,r Pennitlee shall Immediately Inform the District of any changes or inaccuracies in the following company lnformabon which Is currently on file: COMPANY NAME: PHONE: (714)6308111 LOCAL SEWERING AGENCY: HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM FAX: (714)630d141 CITY OF ANAHEIM MAILING ADDRESS: RESPONSIBLE OFFICER: NO.OF EMPLOYEES: 35 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. RUSTYHAWKINS ANAHEIM,CA 92806 PRESIDENT WORK DAYSIYEAR: 260 SERVICE ADDRESS: DESIGNATED SIGNATORY: NAI.C.S.NUMBER: 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. LARRY BOOHER 812332 ANAHEIM,CA 92806 PROD MANAGER E. Falsifying Information r Knowingly making any false statement on any report or other document required by this permit or knowingly rendering any monitoring device or method Inaccurate,is a crime and may result In the imposlfion of criminal sanctions endforcivil penalties. HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM a PERMIT NO.11"79 Page 8 of 13 q e PART 3-STANDARD CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL PROHIBITIONS Perri is required to comply with the general prohibitions and limits on discharges set forth in Article 2 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01 or its successor. A. Prohibited Discharges 'IY B. Prohibition on Dilution C. Prohibition on Surface Runoff and Groundwater D. Prohibition on Unpolluted Water E. ProhlblSon on Radioactive Wastes +' F. Prohibition on the Use of Grinders G. Prohibition on Point of Discharge H. Limits on Wastewater Strength and Characteristics I. Prohibition on Medical Waste 'e J. Prohibition on Disposal of Spent Solutions and Sludges II. CIVIL PENALTIES All users of the District's system and facilities are subject to enforcement actions administratively or judicially by the District, U.S.EPA,State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board,or the County of Orange District Attorney. Any person who violates any provislon of Ordinance No.OCSD-01;or any pennti condition,prohibition or effluent limitation;or any suspension or revocation order shall be liable civilly for a sum not to exceed$25,000.000 per y. violation,for each day In which such violation occurs. A. Administrative Civil Penalties ,0 Administrative Civil Penalties may be assessed as follows: 1.) In an amount which shall not exceed two thousand dollars($2,000.00)for each day far falling or refusing to furnish technical or monitoring reports; ~ 2.) In an amount which shall not exceed three thousand dollars($3,000.00)for each day for falling or refusing to timely comply with any compliance schedules established by the District; 3.) In an amount which shall not exceed five thousand dollars($5,000.00)per violation for each day of discharge in violation of any mate discharge Ilmtl, permit condition,or requirement issued,reissued,or adopted by the District; ,a. 4.) In any amount which does not exceed ten dollars($10.00)per gallon for discharges in violation of any suspension,revocation,cease and desist order or other orders,or prohibition issued,or adopted by the District e/ III. SEVERABILITY The provislons of this permit are severable. If any provision of those permit limits and/or requirements,or the application thereof,to the Pomades is held Invalid,the remainder of the permit limbs and/or requirements shall remain in full forts and effect. IV. OTHER CONDITIONS A. Penalties is required to comply with all regulations and discharge limits in Ordinance No.OCSD-01 and any attachments to this permit. B. Except as expressly authorized by the District,upon the sale or transferofownership of the business forwhich this permit is Issued,this permit shall be void. The perni0ee shall notify the District in writing prior to the transfer of ownership and shall give a copy of the existing permit to the new owner or operator. 1N C. Permits issued under Ordinance No.OCSD-01 am fore curer,for pacific operation at a specific location,and create no vested rights. Discharge permits, their concantyrsntretlon limits or their mess emission refer shall not be Ir HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM s PERMIT NO.21-07s Page 9 of 13 transferred for an operation at a different location. D. Pennitlea shall maintain plant records relatlng to wastewater discharge and waste manifests fore minimum of tlree years. ' PART 4-SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR PERMIT NO. 2-1-079 Permitle ,shall implement any and all steps and measures(including,but not limited to,the installation of pretreatment eguipmentttechnology,and/or the implementation of best management practiwslpollution prevention measures,waste minimization measures,and process modifications)necessary to attain long-term compliance with ti the permitted discharge limits. .e ti ti O Y Y Y Y Y Y HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM•PERMIT NO.21-079 Page 10 of 13 T a d ATTACHMENTS PERMIT NO. 2-1-079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM a a a r r v+ r a HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM•PERMIT NO.?1-079 Page 11 of 13 Y ATTACHMENT A PERMIT NO. 2-1-079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM SELF-MONITORING, REQUIREMENTS s 1. Sampling and Analysis of Heavy Metals a. Composite Sampling• permit"shall collect and analyze a 24-hour composite sample of the wastewater effluent for heavy metals at a frequency specified in Part 2 of the permit. All effluent sampling must be conducted using an sw automatic sampling device which is capable of collecting samples at 15-minute intervals during all hours of discharge in 24-hour day. Flow-proportional samples are acceptable with a minimum of 96 samples collected per 24 hours of discharge. For batch dischargers,a grab sample is acceptable for a well-mixed batch,otherwise a composite sample during the period of discharge must be obtained. a b. Discharge Flow. Water meter readings shall be obtained during the startand end of composite sampling todetermine the volume of water discharged during the 24-hr sampling period. Meter readings are necessary to determine the total flow needed for calculation of daily mass emission rate for the actual wastewater discharged. Additionally,the start and a slop times must be recorded. The units in which the water meter readings am expressed must be properly ascertained. Permitted, shall measure and record daily total flow using flow measurement devices and methods that ensure an accurate measurement of the volume of monitored discharge. The use of effluent meters provides an accurate a measurement of the volume discharged; however, in the absence of effluent meters, the Districts accept the use of incoming water meters or process meter totalizers with appropriate standard deductions such as domestic,process,and landscape losses. These deductions will be applied by the Districts,upon processing of the Seg-Monitoring report,to determine the volume of wastewater discharged to the sewer system. The devices shall be installed,calibrated,and p, maintained to ensure that the accuracy of the measurements are consistent with the accepted capability of that device. c. Laboratory Analyses. All wastewater samples shall be analyzed in accordance with the appropriate procedures contained in 40 CFR 136. Whom 40 CFR 136 does not include sampling or analytical techniques for the pollutants in question,analyses shall be performed using the most currsm million of'Standard Methods for Me Examination of Water and Wastewater. Wastewater analysis shall be performed by a laboratory utilizing the approved method for performing the analyses on the required constituents. Upon the Districts'nequest,Permitte ,shall obtain from their laboratory and fumish to the Districts, information regarding test methods and equipment used, including quality assurancelquality, control(OA/OC)information. Other information deemed necessary by the Districts to determine the adequacy,accuracy, and precision of the results may also be required. 2. Sampling and Analysis for Cyanides a. Sampling. Perrndee shall collect and analyze a sample of its wastewatere(fluent for cyanides ate uen(racy cy specified in Part 2 of the Permit. All sampling for cyanide must be conducted by faking grab samples of the wastewater after cyanide treabnenL but prior to dilution with other streams. Ifthers is no cyanide treatmerd,the samples must be taken at the end of the cyanide process before dilution with other process streams. A minimum of four grab samples shall be taken independently during hours of operation within a 24-hour period. The grab samples may be cmmposited by the laboratory personnel prior to analysis. Proper sampling and preservation techniques in accordance with EPA requirements must be used to ensure representative sample results. a b. Laboratory Analyses. All wastewater samples shall be analyzed for cyanides in accordance with the appropriate procedures contained in 40 CFR 136 using EPA Methods. Wastewater analysis shall be performed by a laboratory Wlizing the approved method for performing the analyses on the required constituents. Upon the Districts' requeeL Pernittee shall obtain from their laboratory and furnish to the Districts,iMormetion regarding test methods and equipment *' used,including QA/QC information. Other information deemed necessary by the Districts to determine the adequacy, accuracy,and precision of the results may also be required. a T w HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM.PERMfr NO.2-1-079 Page 12 of 13 T r 3. Sampling and Analysis for Total Toxic Organics(TTO) r a. Sampling. Penmttee shall collect and analyze samples of the wastewater effluent at the sample point for TTO at a frequency specified in Part 2 of the permit. All effluent sampling for volatile organic compounds must be conducted by taking grab samples of the wastewater effluent. A minimum of four grab samples shall be taken independently during hours of operation within a 24-hr period. Each sample shall be analyzed Independently for toxic organic constituents present in the facility. The average concontretion from the four grab sample results with concentrations greater than 10 pg/L shall be used to determine compliance with TTO mass emission and/or concentration limits. r b. Laboratory Analyses. All wastewater samples shall be analyzed in accordance with the appropriate procedures contained in 40 CFR 136 using EPA Methods(i.e.,for Purgeable Halocarbons and Aromatics,use Methods 601 and 602,or 624). Wastewater analysis shall be performed by a laboratory utilizing the approved method for performing the r analyses on the required constituents. Upon the Districts' request, Permitlee shall obtain from their laboratory and furnish to the Districts,information regarding test methods and equipment used, including OAfOC information. Other Information deemed necessary try the Dismcts to determine the adequacy,accuracy,and precision of the results may also be required. a 4. Sampling and Analysis of BOD and TSS a. Composite Sampling. Permitee shall collect and analyze a 244hourcomposile sample ofthe wastewater effluent at T. the sample point for BOD and TSS at a frequency specified in Part 2 of the permit All effluent sampling must be conducted using an automatic sampling device which is capable of collecting samples at 15-minute intervals during all hoursofdischergeina24-hourday. Flow-proportional samples am acceptable with a minimum of96samplescollecled per 24 hours of discharge. For batch dischargers, a grab sample is acceptable for a wall-mixed batch, otherwise a r composite sample during the period of discharge must be obtained. b. Discharge Flow. Water meter readings shall be obtained during the start and end ofcomposite sampling to determine the volume of water discharged during the 24-hr sampling period. Meter madings am necessary to determine the total r flow needed for calculation of daily mass emission rate for the actual wastewater discharged. Additionally,the start and stop times must be recorded. The units in which the water meter readings am expressed must be property ascertained. Permltee shall measure and record daily total flow using flow measurement devices and methods that ensure an accurate measurement of the volume of monitored discharge. The use of effluent meters provides an accurate measurement of the volume discharged; however, In the absence of effluent meters, the Districts accept the use of incoming water meters or process meter totalizers with appropriate standard deductions such as domestic,process,and landscape losses. These deductions will be applied by the Districts,upon processing of the Set-Montoring report,to V. determine the volume of wastewater discharged to the sewer system.The devices shall be installed, calibrated,and maintained to ensure that the accuracy of the measurements are consistent with the accepted capability of that device. c. Laboratory Analyses. All wastewater samples shall be analyzed in accordance with the appropriate procedures V. contained in 40 CFR 136 using EPA Method. Wastewater analysis shall be performed by a laboratory utilizing the approved method for performing the analyses on the required constituents. Upon the Districts'request,Permitee shall obtain from their laboratory and furnish to the Districts, information regarding test methods and equipment used, Including (UJOC information. Other information deemed necessary by the Districts to determine the adequacy. T. accuracy,and precision of the results may also be required. S. Sampling and Analysis for Oil and Grease(O&G) ,r a. Sampling. Permidee shall collect and analyze samples ofthe wastewater effluent at the sample point location forOBG at a frequency specified in Part 2 of the permit A minimum of four grab samples shall be taken Independently during hours of operation within a 24-hour period. The grab samples may be composited by the laboratory personnel prior to analysis. Proper sampling and preservation techniques,in accordance with EPA requirements,must be used to ensure r representative results. b. Laboratory Analyses. All wastewater samples shall be analyzed in accordance with the appropriate procedures contained in 40 CFR 136 using EPA Method. Wastewater analysis shall be performed by a laboratory utilizing the r approved method for performing the analyses on the required constituents. Upon the Disbicts'request,Penmittee shall obtain from their laboratory and furnish to the Districts, information regarding test methods and equipment used, including CA/QC information. Other Information deemed necessary by the Districts to determine the adequacy, accuracy,and precision of the results may also be required. 'r r r HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM a PERMIT NO.21-079 Page 13 of 13 L ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTW RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR r CLASS I WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT Q L FM Orlpind Instructions Version 5.0 orgrester of Acrober.Acrobat Approvel.or Acrobat Reader must be used or else a dank tormwll be the result. dick m-H*,Abcur to confirm your vemon. Acrobst Reeds;is in his instal dveduy,on ma CD. From he Man Menu,please click on'sdrg the progren.then-using de pennni rs a apphcabon wi a`,and mad 'no sale cgaidly'pdor N rang this form. For the Orange County Sanitetbn District Polaid)to process and issue a Class I Wastewaba Discharge Perri the applicant must comply with all of the following: e The Permit Renewal Application Form must be filled out completely. The District will not process Incomplete submittals, and your application wit be returned If there is any miming information. Do not leave blanks. Please write"NU"N the information being requested does not apply. k The Permit Renewal Application must be signed by the Responsible Officer a Designated Signatory.as defined on pages 6 and 7. The District will return your pemdt appficabon it his not signed by the proper company official. The permit fee must be rrndted at the time the pemid renewal application is submitted. Your retiltlence must be sent directly to the Districts Accounting Departrnenk and,a photocopy of the check must be submitted with the Permit Renewal Application to the Sturm Control Division. An application received without this docamentetlon will be rehrned. Please reta to Section A of the information hachure M detailed instructions for completing this Applialion Fcim { Ownership Information Tab through and mouse over letters A-Z for help completing each line 1_ A Applicant RueM Drretd Tavel Inc.DBA Hawk Industrial Unitame I 2-1-079 Garotte LeaarDmpwy Name Pema No. El Mailing 1120 Amlmdo St rAnehetrn Ca 92806 Santa! City Store $Cade C Sewer Smice I_ Address 1120 Antai St Anahekn Cis 92806 Ay roe D Phone Number ( 714 ) 630-8111 Fir Number ( 714 ) 630-4141 I" E Conpamy Webaite(harry)' hip/1 www.hawkundame.mm '— F Isyourbusmesa Ocor—b-? Operalrship? Osote praprrelrshp7 O Limited Liability Corporation? List all PrincpalNOwnerwMejor Shashd of thefiusiness. This musty ude Responsible Officer equivalent ,Ads PrA/ � QF Ralph Hawkins �o I— Nwneand Tile Morons T 4 Naread The ArHass C; , L. "NNW � ? r 3 rIl Naread The Address n .9 ri I_ For corpore6ons only: year 0 Incorporators Sees,of lnmpondon Corpoess,identification fl;�� G Am you the 0a ISIVIOM e 9 Or 0 essee? It a lessee, include the name, address,and telephone number of the I_ pmprty owner encVor the manager of the property: Check one: 00wner 0 Manager Ralph Hawkins Nor e Address �Pie YiY (— Page 1 of 11 '7/5 Tab through and mouse war letters A-Z for help cornpleting each line Manufacturing Process Infolmadon H DeSagEon of III marwlachetng processes anNor service activities on the premises,wet or dry. Plasm identify and desmbe the processes whch generate wastewater an mwe deta8, (Use addNoiml sheets If nemmary.) Washing Tex8les L 0_ I Description and average cf ewefy of new materials used ar handled: (Use additional sheets If n mssmy.) !�r I r. Ir. i Dssaipte n o1 products Inmiulechred or produced as a readt of services pwfwmed:(Use additional sheets If necessary.) Shvls,Penls,Twek,lAam A4 N Average Daily Production: Ten Harts .� L North American Industry Cfessihcetiun System(NAICS)Code(this rode replaced the dscnntinued SIC Code): JPrerery NAICS Code: 7218 Secondary NAILS Codefs): Page 2 of 11 Tab through antl..,_use over letters A-Z for help canpleting each line Operations Information M opaating Schedule: LNubwdddtspawokder 1 Nntd of k days per oeAc 5 NunbwdproductcndeFpwye 260 Average number ofemployees pan stet 1e 35 2a 3" Tate: 35 Pmtluciam hors WtlwR 1k 10 2-: 3^: Tdd: 10 Discharge hoes par shift 1• 2d', 30. Tate: 0 N Yeenddyoudotcpdsg dtnskx7M? MndL April Yer 1994 O For Industries invotred in SialaceMeml Finishing(wdre aodnmg pro+PbdinA.dams,PCB mwdxh tg,etc) 1 Do you own mono than 50%(area bads)of the materials undagamg procluctu n? QNIA Q Yes O No P Have you=de any additions or modfistlars to the nmmilaud sing posers during are past rule years? O Year O No 1— If the mmwrer is-Yea',you must submit updated Manufacturing Process Layout,Manufacturing process Flow Diagram,and Split Cordalnment Drawings and InkmuHon with this application. LPlasma dowtea anteA the Rwaa changes dung the tad pomurt*ad: I- Information on Treatment of Industrial Waste/Wastewater Q Is any tone of wastaMmstawstor treaErrent preeboed at this feaLtt? QYM ONO I_ If the smwer s'Yes,prM9de the fdbvMg information by cheddng the appropriate hoses: Mode of Operation: O Continuous Q Bath Q Bab I_ • Pretwhmnt Units Used ❑Hydroxide Precgiston El Men Prays ❑CmaFkAu Filtration(e.g.,Memtek) ❑Hexavalent Clo., Redaction ❑Fool Polldnnrg FOW ❑Sorplion FOta(e.g.,Laney) I— Cymide Destructs ❑Spent Chem�I Treatment Unit ❑Almmum Chip ❑Equa(®ton Of3ebwgound Cledta ❑Omre Tm"nt Reactor ❑pH Adjusarem ❑ten E¢dmnge ❑CurdierAemelto Setting ❑Beerwramnlr Plate,out Units ❑other LR How era spent chemises handled! Specify the mb od fcr'ftw ❑Waslahadedotlstb [ Batch leafed order ODschaged to sewer without treatment ❑other S Westewaber OperatnrRdainlarrmm Intrm Pion: I— Number of wastewater prehmInanI operators at you(witty: lwshiR _ 2d ddB 31d aide Qudlgcaton Opendar Name WRMXBtMTIOB MDPW"V& AASoaeawih BSCIMMMI r BSntlhd I.. None CWEACerafrann rm2swm9ets Eavocromel rye or Ci 2 fives von em cam h Memory I Egineaep Sconce ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is here an Operstimi and Maederence Manuel or for th ewe wadewatr heetrnent 7 Q Yes ONO I— Page 3 of 11 Tab through anI over letters A-Z for help completing each line Information for Determining Volume of Wastewater Discharge and User Charges T Assessor Parcel Number(s)as shown on property taxWE: 34498208 Ifa lie,please mute: (a) percentage of properly tax bill paid to himlowner. % (b) percentage of water bill paid to bndawer. % (c) square footage of lased Spam: so con (d) whether your facility is a Part of a cemmerdaumdustnel complex Oyes (E)NO V Water sappy city of Anaheim Water Account NxnbWs): 55-08P?:2e- 4 Other Sou>ces of Water arppiy. ❑0nothe ate [I I]MOdwaer re1MICII on ❑ate W VI Measuraneul lnfamadon. Listaswatermeters atyore amity.Complete Attachment Ain accorda eewith Instructions. From the Incoming meters)identified w Attedament A,check which h9ovrng water measurement strategy Is used: OCiy vats meW(s)ony OPromss meters)only OShop metals)o*O Both city mar and pro. metes The meter(s)checked above measure: 0 Ony the moaning water going b the applicants facl O The incoming water to the applicants tidy y and for other companies adjacent Does your sty um an efbent meta b measure the indusoial wastewater doato a? OYes (j)No If so,does the eBuent meter measure Dj&the hidustr®l wastewater dad. ad to the sews flan he lability(excluding unitary.batter bknWown,cooing tower bleed off,and R.O.reed)? OYes ONO HyarfeePj ums elmd shrnnt aster,sly b 1be Y x In order to delarm a mass em®on rates and user dueges,he acted volume of water discharged to the ewer must be m dated For faciftes mat do net have effluent meters,this b done by determining the Velma of incoming water, as indicated by the city wear meter,and than appyng appropriate deductions for water etoas. If teems cannot be quantified,the District will apply water braes acpvaknt to 5%a the inconding water. It s to your advantage to determine and quantify these bases ff your IeI has water bases more than 5% Please dtack the appucp®te box belay: OAP*S%bss OUaa calculated loss If caki"d loss is Indicated, deterimm all applxabe louses using the worsheet provided In Attachment Bant summoner msub in the table bebw. The waisheet and supporting documentation must be submitted for dese Gams to be RWbd. Am Average Drily Mon,Lon GRI Lon h ll H I Ito CRY sve*) I Plxna New I lsdscape/Yrgdvn lmea 54 ❑ ❑ II Balerb®es fa seen mMemffi rcl rmmetl te bofir �, _ ❑ ❑ m If cog bear rtlr eral araw ❑ ❑ IV ROdldseae I� ❑ ❑ V OVarbos ❑ ❑ TOW Lena rl pork the above a app9utle. Page 4 orM Tab through end owes over letters A-Z for help complefing each fine _ Certification for Accuracy of Information (" I have persone8y examined and am familiar wMh the infonrwMon submitted in Mes epplicatmn end required attachmen✓s,end I herebyw0y undarpenatly oflaw Mrat Me submMled information k true,accurate,and complete. I_ I am aware that there are significant panafties for submitfbg Was information, inatudng the possibi7dy of fine and impastinment. I also aubym the District kr verify all obmrabon provided, mckift th water ac=myuwp nbmwbon Iran the watersupplier,faa7dy lease conbecls,andotherpartinent infonnefion. Ir I certify that upon issuance ofMre permit,Me this firms operation and @s resultant wastewater dscharge will achieve consisted com*nce with Me Dshucrs Ordinance and appfaable Federal wastewater discharge requirements. M Me wastewatordacharge does not most all the apolade regulations,the company will modify mariAadurntg Ir equlpmerd,W,production,firnfi rdustrol waste discharge,instal waslewaterprabaebwerd equipment or do whatever is kgalty necessary to meet discharge requirements. L Y w OFceriDesl. Slgnatrry es ape 1fied ages Send 7): I_ tmae: I_ rme: yrCS�zT Date: c� I o l0 ro I_ 6rs➢: I_ I_ z Name of the person to conlect concereng nformetion provided in this appfimtion: Score a ebore I_ Name: I_ Pores TNe: I_ There _ Brat: Page 5 of 11 THIS IS MANDATORY. -+ Complete arid return this form. Certification of Responsible Officer 1, the undersigned, do hereby certify,that I meet the definition of a Responsible Officer, as outlined below: A responsible officer is defined as follows: 1. For a corporation: a A president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of the principal business functions, or any other person who performs similar policy- or decision-making functions for the corporation, or r. b. The manager of one or mom manufacturing, production, or operation facilities employing more then 250 persons or having gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding $25 million (in second-quarter 1980 dollars), if auMorlty to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures. 2 For partnership or sole proprietorship, a general partner or proprietor, respectively. .y I accept the responsibility for the overall operation of the facility andror overall responsibility for compliance with ell regulatory requirements for the facility from which the wastewater discharge r originates. l understand that If, in the %urv, this Information Is no longer correct, the District will be notl6ed in willing to establish a new Re si le Officer Lr r Name of Responsible Officer a aa+ rwl I .. Signal __ cc onto O O f Me ^Y-GeJ. E-mail address a Company Nam Permit No. NOTE: All correspondence regarding permit, enforcement, and seH�monitoring Issues (e.g., Self-Monitoring Forms and Reminder Letters, Notices of Violations, Permit Application, etc.) shall be sent to the Responsible ODlrxr or to the Designated Signatory If properly authorized. If there Is a change in the Responsible Officer or Designated Signatory In the future, the m Districts must be notified in writing and the appropriate form must be submitted. r Page 6 of 11 L ATTACHMENT (This form must be completed manually) LONSITE WATER METER INFORMATION LREQUIRED INFORMATION: Complete the ONSITE WATER METER table for ill water meters at your facility Meter Type Digts Zama *•� Units pb Location ❑city ❑Process ❑Cu.FL ❑X10 ,CG rbo' Al ST ❑Stop ❑Effluent IS161SIZ. 7 •!0 ❑Gwas Dxtoo D city ❑Process DOs Ft DxiD ❑Shop ❑Effluent ❑Gdias 0X100 ❑Ciy ❑Process ❑Ou.Ft DX 10 r ❑Shop ❑Effluent ❑Gan= D X 100 I4_ 0ciy ❑Process ❑CIL Ft OX10 ❑fOhop ❑Effluent ❑Goo= ❑X 1DO L ❑Cry DVoass Ft OX10 D Shop ❑Effluent D Galas D x 100 ❑Cry ❑Process DCU Ft ❑X10 ❑ ❑Effluent 0 080= ❑X too INSTRUCTIONS L STEP1. Please identify for each Onslte Water Meter at your facility. Meter type-Use the following descriptions to characterize your meter type(s). The City Meters typo al faro outside at all buldings The mete type, maintained by the water purveyor(city or 1=1 agency), is used e L measure i corrlg rater for potable, sanibry, landscaping. and tndivbiel uses The readings from Nest meters are used be datermos the charges on the monthly or bFrtonthy water bats. The Process Meter Is faceted dwmstrearn of afl dim",mNbry, and Iandsapirg urea. Process meters are typicaey Irsb9ed to determine water usage to apedFi Industrial proms. The Effluent Meter retards the actual volute of wastevaier cisdwhged by the ten3y and is typically located at the discharge point rear the designated sample point The O.C. &n1aboi District may require an effluent mar b determine daily flaws for cmtobas verif®0on, and/or to establish accurate m*wv a service diarges. The Step Meter is often found In a mab ompen y Industrial strip that does not have trxgvidal city meters ter each wife Landlords who do net wand to pay the weer big far a sgM6mm water user clean trhsed a rmer on the evade of the slop. it s distinguished from the promos meter In that it also meters the potable and sanfbry Mv,Was a city meter. The weer purveyor des not bit the user&at* for%orr usage metered by a shop mess. ire tardbd 91"W*bill the amen dredFy,based pan the shop Im7er vagaries. • DlghtsfFixed Zemsfrenths- Use the Diggs, Fixed Zeros, and Tenths columns to record the current meter reading. Include the beginning dlgts, even If they are L zero, as well as, the foxed zeros, or tenths designated by the arrow sweep. Please visually rood each meter. t provide values or volumes from the water figs. Use did fondwsg to guidaWes for Fixed Zeros and Tenths to pro vide ovide assstarta with reading and recording he Information for swerel carrion mein vatatfrs. Flood Zeros-On nary watr meter madas fhe Model anew records numerical uNs tat ere designated by L the fixed roes on the telai readout Use the three shaded oDiums dedgnatad Food Zoos to Ohd®te Oat the mffWs crow mew rends silts(0-9)digit dDA4e(1D-90)digit a trpte(100-B00)dgIt veWm Tenths-On many water mew models the dal nar6ers (selected by the arrow swap),a the fast align of a totaher readout designates terttls of a fidon. Use the tanks mums (i pted by to doornail port)to ndrae to meter mmhds @n@m of a fallen I_ • UnhslMuttipller- Indicate the meter units, Cubic Feet (Cu. Ft) or Gallons. If applicable, indicate the multiplier factor(x 10 or x ICO). Do not ecnfuse this with the typical bgling unit(100 CF)on the monthty water bill. Units - most aster mabrs regisdi the wtsre of wale In eftha a6i feet or gal Please thdc l O you matr uses a dlfleent unt of rmaarenenl such as bares,able meters.or sere feet Multiplier-Occasionally to meter dal wi l indicate that a morphs(X 10 or X 100) _ mist be applied b the toafom reading (tea famine is more common m ebcbwhic few in&anr,,$). Please indices, dismu,t mudager factors as appfxable. I_ Location -Briefly describe the location of each meter. Descriptive forms and location relem, mch as nxbada, street vault north sce of lauding, ktscle the proms area, egacem b to ormevsay,an the east wag,etc.,will erg"our fled staff vadY the efamatim by asah'shing vital reference pains. Is STEP 2. Attach a copy of the latest water bill for each city meter identified. I_ Page 8 of 11 (This I=muat be complated nanually) ATTACHMENT B ITEMIZED CALCULATION OF WATER LOSSES Losses refer to the incoming water used that does not go to the sewer. This includes water used for lendscapingfirngation, water evaporated from cooling towers, water evaporated from boilers in which condensate is not returned to the boiler, water evaporated from heated tanks or processes, wash water going to the storm drain, water actually added to your product, or any other processes where water does not go to the sewer. Calculate the losses as shown below: I. LANDSCAPE/IRRIGATION LOSSES Square Footage of Loss Factor Nunberof Daysper todzepe Losses Landscaped Nee(ffl x 25 geVsq.g/yr. Veer ge :d 50 x 25 30 7-74, 79 E It. BOILER LOSSES FROM STEAM CONDENSATE NOT RTURNED TO BOILER Boller Flasepoee band on Loos Fau$r rddNo.of Operates Boiler Losses �� Sa96 otboda rating x 3b geMdhp x hcuey B May O 0 x 1 35 1 x I I C) (1� III. WATER EVAPORATION LOSSES FROM COOLING TOWERS Tannage Loss Fatter Number of Conversion Cooling hundred design tens x 25 galhneVloo x Ope ding x Factor Tower Losses design tons howsA* So nmdM pYday x 25 x Page S of 11 (This tone must be completed manually) ATTACHMENT B r ITEMIZED CALCULATION OF WATER LOSSES (Corrtnu Lion) r IV. WATER INTO PRODUCT(Please show calculations and submit back-up documentation.) r DeYem 1^055es = .506K I6s/de-y tjcPeA,6w-L "ows 0,6 Pcv`5 o6 w<-l-lz �s r 90APO¢4-z� Ale Lo'V rj Pow-6 dfyecl . 68jt 6s�icy 0,H = � r �r r V. OTHER LOSSES (Pteerse show calculations and submit back-up documentation.) GNAW la- Pu--j ,t�r, 4 R 400 G*1lows 4111� Pvw�-�r D , i $UO x c f : 7 ZOo 6o lloni s/pew- yeent I " 260 Plul (Docnop N-15 = 30 6iAtton>s Pe-K -1,eA-r— Ir I „ ��1 !2� InJASN TG�tccs f} w�nrK I r 1(0 WK T 1AA-K t&.kk N CV.A/&:s Lti-4ekl y ZZr7 — 7� `f 7 Gr•.AI�rINS /+ VA/ r r � r Papa to utt7 r I� HAWK INDUSTRIAL( IFORM UNIONB 7F CAUFORNIA 252� 112ON.ARMANDOS�HEET DAFirri AVE.CA 92rA0 AN EIM,CA 9281M 1"9/1220 I_ (71e)E2O-8111 629/2006 Ir PAY TO THE O+erge County Sanitation Di94ict $"1,570.00 ORDER OF One Thousand Five Hundred Seventy and 00/100'r•••..........wo.A.e..........o•...w...e...............u..eu.. ' DOLLARS Ormuge County Saturation Dieaic P.O.BOX 9127 I Foancm Valley,CA 92708-7018 AUTHORIZED$eONATURE r , ly •0252L.891 1: L22000L961: 20t, 2021.873m I_ HAWKINDUSTRIAL UNIFORM Orange Cmnly Samctian Dusan 6/292OD6 252 Dote Type Reference Onguuel Ant Balance Doe Duscotcl Payment I,r 03/102DD6 BID precut fee§ 1,570.00 1570.00 1,570.00 Check Acaant 1,570.00 I� 11 Ir C: L rn aC, rn I � rn Ground-UmDn Bank-Ha tJw :4 rA,570.00 0 I� HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM Orange County Smutacm Diann 6292006 252 _ Date Type Refaeace O`igi al And. Balance Dar Du=mt payment 03/102006 BiR permut fee's 1,570.D0 1,570.00 1,5MOO Checknlmant 1,570.00 I_ m General-Union Bank-Ha 1,570.00 u EXHIBIT B Hawk Industrial Uniform Photographs of the Designated Sampling Point y OHM Admim"Ne Gompbmt 091206FINAM _i Nl r �T rz Hawk Industrial Uniform designated sample point, 3/16/2006 EXHIBIT C Hawk Industrial Uniform Past Due Invoices and Correspondence .. SHMk ACmins Ne Campleln1091206FINALM I = I = 1 = I mI 1 = 1 s 1 w 1 we 1 m I m 1 a l s l m 1 = I B� I 1 . m I = 1 M R030G 10 Omge Coldly San0R04n Dist. 0907MB 13.36:03 OCSDMI AOT DBWla W%Agig Pees- 1 Aft Del. 09107M Compmry: MIS C09eo0ee Syfibm ..........DooumenL........ 1.0 Doe DOW Ty NomS Company Item OM C DOW OOgkwal nt op"mom CumeM _ 40.90 81-180 _181.365 366-990 _ Over No CwmmM: mrl NwA InR+%ft 11n041m Pharr .Nemben t I Cmd4 Umn M4uree Cman tlm0 R4 514M MIS O0 IM11D5 1915106 12,17546 12,175M 12,17540 R4 9049N OMIS 00 IMIM5 12ISM 0,030.21 B,IW.21 6,038.21 R4 W53W MIS WO IMMS 12/15915 16,230.69 10,290.mg 10,23562 R4 905889 00015 OW 1MVM IVISV5 0.339.67 0,339ST 8,33987 W 313M =15 01 I2T19N5 U1111/05 1,OM00 t000m 1.00000 R4 313" MIS WI INIMS I211M5 903.02 W3.02 50362 R4 313T0 MIS 0011N19105 MOMS 1,00.00 1009W 1,00.0 R4 31379 0 is 0011211M5 121IM5 8339T 033.97 833,97 R4 515384 MIS M IMIM OW14MG 12.i7546 12,17546 12,1T546 W 31529 OW15 001 OIMM OL16NB 417.15 WAS 417.15 RF 31711 MIS 001 02A1M6 0 JIM 741.46 741,40 741.46 R4 3104T =15 W1 0T216R36 0 POMe I.WOW 1,00.0 Imoo RF 31853 OM15 001 9aM0 W I(M 762.03 762.03 762.03 W 32023 MIS W1 OW11O0 03121I06 157.W 157.W 15T0 R4 5IMU O0I5 000MNW 0UISM 12,I75.46 12.IT5.46 12,115,46 W =12 OMIS 001 OWMG 0116I06 1,888.60 1,86660 1,866.6E R4 32050 =15 001 OSIIBN6 05118108 1,000.00 1,000.00 1.000.00 W 32513 MIS WI OMSP36 OTM=% 1.19T.71 1,10TS1 1107.71 R4 518204 MIS 000 08130108 00110108 12.175,46 12,175.46 12.175.46 RF 32T26 O015 W107AXM 00IOW 1,013,94 1,013.94 1,013.B4 R4 32099 MIS 01 OBf02106 0BN2300 115TT 115TT II9.TT RF 32WB 00015 W1 0802me 08/1610 1,140.13 1,140.13 1.140.13 R4 33017 =15 W1 0011M8 MIMS 1,OM.00 1,OM.00 1,00.0 RF 33129 WUIS 01 0M5108 Imam 1,39956 1,3W.50 1,39 m _. Coa . 24881 Nema In Usbal 90.509.63 W,609.63 3,058.48 13,189.0 10.308.55 63.32592 Un6mm Compalry: 0015 CMtedlon SyaNm 9B.6BB.63 W.60B.83 3.659.0 15.109.40 16,390.85 03.323.92 t t t t [ ! l [ t t t l l l t [ [ l t RO]Ba281B Om,o County BOaU W OLLI pBOyl08 1]98:0! OC]OOOot AIR DOWN wB.ABmp pno- ] ABBq ID b BBO'/108 f .Pm f. CaBOtlim 8y.bm .......... myOln o D.mr ry nwW C Pany Mn Oam CM.kft% OdgmatA M Open Am.um Cu 4 d8-80 81-188 181-]B6 360-BBB Owr BBB Omnd Total BB fieBA] B868B BI ]859.aB 1]188.10 iB 38888 B19B].CL Orange County Sanitation District ea P.O.Box 8127 Fwmtaln Valley,California 92728-8127 PHONE (714)962-2411 ro FAX:1714196223954 Invoice Date: 12119/05 Invoice No.: 31376 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 12/19/05 1120 N. Armando St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 ORIGINAL INVOICE J DATE INVOICE DUE `NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT . - 12/19/05 31376 12/19/06 10% Penalty on Invoice 514984 11000.00 J J ••• Please Note Due Date ••• '� •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• s Toni Amount Now Due 11000.00 r r Orange County Sanitation District p P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Carrfonnia 92728-8127 PHONE: 1714)962-2411 p a7 FAX: (714)962-3954 Invoice Date: 12/19/05 Invoice No.: 31377 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 12/19/05 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 a ORIGINAL INVOICE a DATE INVOICE DUE DESCRIPTION <AMOUNT NUMBER DATE 12/19/05 31377 12/19/05 10% Penalty on Invoice 904920 603.82 �1 J �1 J ••• Please Note Due Date •'• •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount " I J Total Amount Now Due 603.82 I i �. Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fauntaln Valley, California 92728-8127 PHONE: (714)962-2411 FAX: (714)962-3954 Invoice Date: 12/19/05 Invoice No.: 31378 ' Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 12/19/05 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 ,yl ORIGINAL INVOICE r DATE INVOICE DUE NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT rJ I 12/11/05 31378 12/19/05 1011 Penalty on Invoice 905350 1,000.00 I r JI IIr r Please Note Due Date '•• I •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• i T- r' Total Amount Now Due 1,000.00 Orange County Sanitation District Q P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CaBFomla 92728-8127 PHONE: (714)962-2411 pro FAX:(714)962-3954 Invoice Date: 12/19/05 Invoice No.: 31379 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 12/19/05 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 �y ORIGINAL INVOICE 1 - INVOICE DUE. „JJ DATE NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT --. 12/19/05 31379 12/19/05 10% Penalty on Invoice 905689 833.97 J J ••• Please Note Due Date ••• •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• JTotal Amount Now Due 833.97 J J J Orange County Sanitation District YS P.O.Box 8127 Fountain valley,California 92728-8127 PHONE: (714)962-2411 Jm FAX:(7141 9623954 Invoice Date: 01102/06 Invoice No.: 31529 J Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 02116/06 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 ,y ORIGINAL INVOICE 1 INVOICE out - P T J DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NUMBER DATE - 01/02/06 31529 02116/06 Finance Charge 417.15 J J J J J ••• Please Note Due Date ••• I �+ •• 10% Panaky on Past Due Amount •• J Total Amount Now Due 417.15 J Orange County Sanitation District J P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,California 92728-8127 PHONE: (714)962-2411 Jt�ec FAX:(714) 962.3954 Invoice Date: 02101/06 Invoice No.: 31637 J Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 03/18/06 1120 N. Armando St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 J ORIGINAL INVOICE DATE INVOICE FDUE ' - DESCRIPTION AMOUNT . . .NUMBER DATE 02/01/06 31637 03/18/06 Permit Fee Renewal 112-1.079 1,570.00 �1 d1 J J1 ..J •'• Please Note Due Date ••• •• 10% Penalty on Peet Due Amount •• Total Amount Now Due 1,570.00 i J Orange County Sanitation District g P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley. California 92728-8127 PHONE: (714)962-2411 p ra FAX: (714)962-3954 j Invoice Date: 02/02/06 +PI Invoice No.: 31711 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 03/19/06 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 J J ORIGINAL INVOICE J DATE INVOICE .DUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NUMBER DATE J02/02/06 31711 03/19106 Finance Charge 741.46 J J J J J '•• Please Note Due Date ••' I •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• Total Amount Now Due 741.46 J _I Orange County Sanitation District rI Q P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley. CelBomia 92728.8127 PHONE: 17141 962-2411 Ib oc FAX: (714) 962-3954 ae1 Invoice Date: 02/16/06 _I Invoice No.: 31847 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 04/02/06 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 �I ORIGINAL INVOICE �I DATE INVOICE DUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NUMBER DATE ' 02/16/06 31847 04/02/06 10% Penalty on Invoice 515394 1.000.00 r �I r� r� _I _I ••• Please Note Due Date '•• '• 10% Penalty on Pest Due Amount '• _I Total Amount Now Due 1,000.00 _I _t Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Be.8127 1 Fountain Valley, CaMomla 92728-8127 PHONE: 17141 962-2411 b ��+ FAX: (714) 962-3954 a, Invoice Date: 03/02/06 Invoice No.: 31953 J Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 04/16/06 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 J ORIGINAL INVOICE J DATE INVOICE DUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NUMBER DATE 03/02/06 31953 04116106 Finance Charge 762.03 J ••• Please Note Due Date ••• �� •• 10% Penalty on Pest Due Amount •• Total Amount Now Due 762.03 1 Orange County Sanitation District Q P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Ca6tomia 92728-8127 PHONE: (714)962.2411 p v� FAX: (714) 962-3954 invoice Date: 03/21/06 Invoice No.: 32023 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 03/21/06 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 JI ORIGINAL INVOICE ..2 DATE INVOICE 'DUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NUMBER DATE J03/21/06 32023 03121/06 10% Penaltty on Invoice 31637 157.00 ••• Please Note Due Date ••' " 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •` Total Amount Now Due 157.00 Orange County Sanitation District P.O.Boa 8127 Fountain VWhW,CaMomlo 92728-8127 PHONE:(714)9624411 r� eea FAX:(7141962.3954 Invoice Date: 05/02/08 Invoice No.: 32312 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 06116/06 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 ORIGINAL INVOICE INVOICE DUE NUMBER . _ wl DATE DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT - 05/02/06 32312 06/16/06 Finance Charge 1,866.68 �d �I 4 a WI •Y ••• Please Note Due Date ••• •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• Total Amount Now Due 11866.68 ti ti Orange County Sanitation District P.D. Box 8127 Fountain Velley, California 92728-8127 PHONE: (714) 962.2411 C7 FAX: (714) 962-3954 J Invoice Date: 05116/06 Invoice No.: 32356 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 05/16/06 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 .d ORIGINAL INVOICE DATE INVOICE DUE DESCRIPTION .AMOUNT NUMBER DATE 05/16/06 32356 05/16/06 10% Penalty on Invoice 515800 1,000.00 a ••• Please Note Due Date '•• " 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• Total Amount Now Due 1,000.00 �d J Orange County Sanitation District J P.O. Box 8127 Fountain VeBay,California 92728-8127 PHONE: 1714)962.2411 Jb eo FAX:1714)962-3954 Invoice Date: 06/05/06 Invoice No.: 32513 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 07/20/06 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 J J ORIGINAL INVOICE J INVOICE DUE DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NUMBER DATE' J06/05/06 32513 07/20/06 Finance Charge 1,197.71 J J J ti ••• Please Note Due Date ••• .a •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• ~ Total Amount Now Due 1,197.71 w r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1 P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 IDS"ELLIS AVENUE,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 PHONE:(714)962-2411 FAX:(714)962.3954 1 FISCAL YEAR 2005.2006 -USE CHARGE INVOICE - 1st QUARTER 1 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM INVOICE DATE: 10/31/2005 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. INVOICE NO.: 514984 ANAHEIM,CA 92806 DUE DATE: UPON RECEIPT 1 PERMIT NO. : 2-1.079 QUARTERLY BILLING PLEASE NOTE DUE DATE— 1 JUL 1,2005-SEP 30,2005 —10%PENALTY PLUS INTEREST ON DELINQUENT AMOUNT— Description o -was ^Unit Basis _ qtgIl, ' fi u. 1 Million Gallons Industrial Volume 1.6904 $637.55 $1.077.71 Sanitary Volume 0.0711 $637.55 $45.33 1 $1,123.04 r 1,000 Lbs 1 Industrial BOD( 1,709 mg/L) 24.093 $288.50 $6,950.83 Sanitary BOD(250 mg/L) 0.148 $288.50 S42.70 $6,993.53 1 1,000 Lbs r Industrial TSS(345 mg/L) 4.864 $432.14 $2.101.93 Sanitary TSS(250 mg/L) 0.148 $432.14 $63.98 1 $2,165.89 1 Total 08M Charge $10,282.46 Total Tax Credit ($163.37) r Net 08M Charge $10,119.09 j r SUPPLEMENTAL CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE(SCFCC)OVER BASELINE i Yearly Baseline Allocation: Flow(MG)0.0250 BOD(KLbs)0185 TSS(KLh$)0.15 r Charges Over Baseline Overlies_ Rate Charge Industdal VOLUME MG 0.0000 $1001.00 $0.00 Industrial BOO 1,000 LBS 7.113 $289.10 $2.056.37 r Industrial TSS 1,000 LBS 0.000 $187.15 $0.00 1 SCFCC Charge $2,056.37 r Total O&M and SCFCC Charges $12,175.46 1 ""UNIT BASIS IS ESTIMATED ON QUARTERLY USAGE"" THIS INVOICE IS DELINQUENT 12/1 SM005. 1 TO BETTER SERVE YOU AND AS ONE OF YOUR PERMIT.CONDITIONS,THE DISTRICT REQUIRES THAT YOUR FIRM SUBMIT COPIES OF YOUR WATER AND TAX BILLS AS OBTAINED=THANK YOU 1 TOTAL 1st QUARTER INVOICE AMOUNT DUE $12,175.46 rl ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9W08-7018 .� PHONE:(714)962-2411 FAX:(714)962-3954 n SEMIANNUAL USE RECONCILIATION CHARGE INVOICE Jul 2004 to DEC 2004 r HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM INVOICE DATE: 10/31/2006 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. INVOICE NO. 904920 ANAHEIM,CA 92806 FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005A DUE DATE UPON RECEIPT IPERMIT NO. 2.1.079 mated Description of Charges Ea Bille p Units Actual Units 'Rate Charge: - ri Million Gallon Industrial Volume 3.6601 $368.58 $1,349.04 ' Sanitary Volume ': 4�1 0.1422 $368.58 $52.41 s' $1,401.45 I 1,000 Use Industrial BOD(918 mg/L) MAIMMM 28.022 $248.55 $6,964.87 Sanitary BOD(250 mg1L) BOB", 0.296 $248.55 $73.57 $7,03BA4 r 1,000 Lbs Industrial TSS(275 mglL) G'-T 8.394 $238.45 $2,001.55 I Sanitary TSS(250 mg/L) G s=:{` B 0.296 $238A5 $70.58 r $2,072.13 JO&M Charge $10,512.02 J Secured&Unsecured Tax Credit ($75.79) Property Tax Sill Sewer Service Fee Credit ($250.96) JTotal Tax Credit ($326.75) Net O&M Charge $10,18527 District Collection of Tax Data Fee $0.00 District Collection of Water Date Fee $0.00 Total O&M Chargesl(Credit) $6,038.21 TOTAL INVOICE AMOUNT DUE $6 038.21 This Invoice is deliquent after 1211512006. 10%PENALTY PLUS INTEREST ON PAST DUE AMOUNT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10544 ELLIS AVENUE,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA MOM-7018 PHONE:(714)962-2411 FAX:(714)962.3W SEMIANNUAL USE RECONCILIATION CHARGE INVOICE Jan 2005 to Jun 2005 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM INVOICE DATE: 10131/2006 7 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. INVOICE NO. 905350 —11 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 FISCAL YEAR 2004-20D58 DUE DATE UPON RECEIPT PERMIT NO. 2-1-079 Description or Charges Estimated Actual Units Rate ..Charge Billed Units Million Gallons Industrial Volume AIL UAW 3.1014 $577.30 $1,790.44 Sanitary Volume R 0.1422 $577.30 $82.09 $1.872.53 1,000 Lbs J Industrial BOD(2,500 mglL) e ' 64.664 $270.68 $17.503.25 Sanitary BOD(250 mg/L) Xa 0,296 $270.68 $80.12 1 $17,583.37 J I 1,000 Lbs Industrial TSS(414 mg/L) r".. 10.708 $414.27 $4,436.00 7 Sanitary TSS(250 mg/L) ,' 8 0.296 $414.27 $122.62 JI $4,558.62 08M Charge $24,014.52 7 Secured 8 Unsecured Tax Credit ($75.79) III Property Tax Bill Semr Service Fee Credit ($250.96) Total Tax Credit ($326.75) Net 08M Charge $23,687.77 District Collection of Tax Data Fee $100.00 District Collection of Water Data Fee $100.00 J T _ ��) JTotal 08M Charges/(Credit) $18,236.69 J TOTAL INVOICE AMOUNT DUE $18,236.69 I J This Invoice is deliquent after 12/15/2006. 10%PENALTY PLUS INTEREST ON PAST DUE AMOUNT J r I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT I P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CAUFORNIA 9272"127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 r PHONE:(714)962-2411 FAX:(714)962-3954 SUPPLEMENTAL CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE(SCFCC)OVER BASELINE r l HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM INVOICE DATE: 10/31/2006 I 1120 N.ARMANDO 5T. INVOICE NO. 905889 ANAHEIM,CA 92606 FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 r DUE DATE UPON RECEIPT r I PERMIT NO. 2-1-079 Description of Charges Actual Units Overage Rate Charge over.Baseline IMillion Gallons Industral Volume 6.7615 0.0000 $1001.00 $0.00 rl 1,=Lbs IIndustrial BOO( 1.709 m9/L) 96.372 28.647 $289.10 $8,339.67 r I1,000 Lba Industrial TSS(345 mglL) 19.455 0.000 $187.15 $0.00 rl $8,339.67 rl rl rl I (Be advised that SCFCC does not apply unless baseline Is exceeded by amount specdred M Ordinance) r IDaily Baseline Allocation: Flow(MG)0.0250 BOD(KLbs)0.185 TSS(KLbs) 0.150 r rl rl I TOTAL CFCC INVOICE AMOUNT DUE S8 339.67 r rl This Invoice Is dellquant after 12/1512006. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 .o 10844 ELLIS AVENUE,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 PHONE:(714)962-2411 FAX:(714)962-3954 FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 - USE CHARGE INVOICE -2nd QUARTER I HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM INVOICE DATE : 1 2/3112 0 0 5 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. INVOICE NO. : 515394 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 DUE DATE : UPON RECEIPT IPERMIT NO. : 2-1-079 QUARTERLY BILLING "'PLEASE NOTE DUE DATE— IOCT 1,2005-DEC 31,2005 —10%PENALTY PLUS INTEREST ON DELINQUENT AMOUNT" , 'Unit Basis Rate Charge I MIIOon(Ni lons _ Indusbrial Volume 1.6904 $637.55 $1,077.71 Sanitary Volume 0.0711 $637.55 $45.33 I $1,123.04 .. 1,000 Lbs I Industrial BOD(1,709 mg/L) 24.093 $288.50 $6.950.83 Sanitary BOD(250 mg/L) 0,148 $288.50 $42.70 $6,993.53 I 1,000 Lbs Industrial TSS(345 mg/L) 4.864 $432.14 $2.101.93 Sanitary TSS(250 mg/L) 0.148 $432.14 $63.96 I $2,165.89 I Total O&M Charge $10,282.46 Total Tax Credit ($163.37) Net O&M Charge $10,119.09 I — SUPPLEMENTAL CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE(SCFCC)OVER BASELINE I Yearly Baseline Alloca0om Flow(MG)0.0250 BODlKLbs)0 185 TSS(KLbs)0.15 Charges Over Baseline Ove�ra ee Rate Charge Industrial VOLUME MG 0.0000 $1001.00 $0.00 I Industrial BOD 1,000 LBS 7.113 $289.10 $2,056.37 Industrial TSS 1,000 LBS 0.000 $187.15 $0.00 I SCFCC Charge $2,056.37 Total O&M and SCFCC Charges $12,175.46 -UNIT BASIS IS ESTIMATED ON QUARTERLY USAGE•"' THIS INVOICE IS DELINQUENT 02/1412006. I TO BETTER SERVE YOU AND AS ONE OF YOUR PERMIT CONDITIONS,THE DISTRICT REQURES THAT YOUR FIRM SUBMIT COPIES OF YOUR WATER AND TAX BILLSAS OBTAINED-THANK YOU ITOTAL 2nd QUARTER INVOICE AMOUNT DUE $12,175.46 —I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALFORNIA 92728-8127 10544 ELLIS AVENUE,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708.7018 _ PHONE:(714)962-2411 FAX:(714)9623954 FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 - USE CHARGE INVOICE -3rd QUARTER HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM INVOICE DATE: 03/31/2006 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. INVOICE NO.: 515800 ANAHEIM,CA 92806 DUE DATE: UPON RECEIPT IPERMIT NO. : 2-1-079 QUARTERLY BILLING ''PLEASE NOTE DUE DATE"' IJAN 1,2006-MAR 31,200E —10% PENALTY PLUS INTEREST ON DELINQUENT AMOUNT"' 'anof Charges '�:,, .°.Unit Basis Rate IM I Million Gallons _ Industrial Volume 1.6904 $637.55 $1.077.71 Sanitary Volume 0.0711 $637.55 $45.33 I $1.123.04 1,000 Lha I Industrial ROD(1,709 mg/L) 24.093 $288.50 $6.950.83 Sanitary ROD(250 mg/L) 0.148 $288.50 $42.70 $6,993.53 I 1,000 Lbs Industrial TSS(345 mg/L) 4.864 $432.14 $2,101.93 Sanitary TSS(250 mg/L) 0.148 $432.14 $63.96 I $2,165.89 Total O&M Charge $10,282.46 Total Tax Credit ($163.37) —I Net O&M Charge $10,119.09 SUPPLEMENTAL CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE(SCFCC)OVER BASELINE Yearly Baseline Alloca0on: Flow(MG)0 0250 BOD(KLbs10 185 TSS(KLbs)0150 — Charges Over Buellne Overage Rate Charae Industrial VOLUME MG 0.0000 $1001.00 $0.00 Industrial BOD 1,000 LBS 7.113 $289.10 $2,056.37 Industrial TSS 1,000 LBS 0.000 $ 187.15 $0.00 SCFCC Charge $2,056.37 Total O&M and SCFCC Charges $12,175.46 ""UNIT BASIS IS ESTIMATED ON QUARTERLY USAGE .... THIS INVOICE IS DELINQUENT 0511512006. TO BETTER SERVE YOU AND AS ONE OF YOUR PERMIT CONDITIONS,THE DISTRICT REQURES THAT YOUR FIRM SUBMIT COPIES OF YOUR WATER AND TAX BILLS AS OBTAINED-THANK YOU — I TOTAL 3rd QUARTER INVOICE AMOUNT DUE $12,175.46 Orange County Sanitation District >? P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,California 92728-8127 PHONE:1714)962.2411 p FAX:17141962.3954 J Invoice Date: 05/02/06 Invoice No.: 32312 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORMS Due Date: 06/16/06 1120 N. ARMONDO Account No.: 24897 ANAHEIM CA 92806 �I I ORIGINAL INVOICE J DATE INVOICE DUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NUMBER DATE 05/02/06 32312 06/16106 Finance Charge 1.866.68 .dl .d �I e•d ••• Please Note Due Date ••• - •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• y Total Amount Now Due 11866.68 Orange County Sanitation District g P.O. Box 8127 r Fountain Valley, Colitomla 92728-8127 PHONE: (714) 962-2411 p �c. FAX: (714) 962-3954 Invoice Date: 05/16/06 Invoice No.: 32356 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORMS Due Date: 05/16/06 1120 N. ARMONDO Account No.: 24897 ANAHEIM CA 92806 ORIGINAL INVOICE DATE INVOICE DUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NUMBER DATE 05/16/06 32356 05/16/06 10% Penalty on Invoice 515800 1,000.00 m r r ••' Please Note Due Date ••• s '• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount '• 'I Total Amount Now Due 11000.00 ..I �I rl Orange County Sanitation District I £' P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley.California 92728-8127 PHONE:(714)962-2411 I eo FAX: (714)962-3954 r IInvoice Date: 06/05/OB Invoice No.: 32513 1 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORMS Due Date: 07/20/06 1120 N. ARMONDO Account No.: 24897 I ANAHEIM CA 92606 r ORIGINAL INVOICE INVOICE DUE,r DATENUMBER DATE DESCRIP'i'I0N AMOUNT 06/05/06 32513 07/20/06 Finance Charge 1,197.71 �J r, J �I ••• Please Note Due Date ••• dll •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •' Total Amount Now Due 1,197.71 w r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P.O.BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 108/4 ELLIS AVENUE,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92706-7018 PHONE:(714)M4411 FAX,-(714)982-3954 FISCAL-YEAR 2005-2006 -USE CHARGE INVOICE -4th QUARTER HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM INVOICE DATE: 06/30/2006 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. INVOICE NO.: 516204 ANAHEIM,CA 92806 DUEDATE: UPONRECEIPT PERMIT NO.: 2-1-079 QUARTERLY BILLING 'PLEASE NOTE DUE DATE"' APR 1.2006-JUN 30.2005 '10%PENALTY PLUS INTEREST ON DELINQUENT AMOUNT"' Million Gallons Industrial Volume 1.6904 $637.55 $1.077.71 as Sanitary Volume 0.0711 $637.55 $45.33 $1,123.04 1,000 Lbs Industrial BOD(1,709 mg/L) 24.093 $288.50 $6,950.83 Sanitary BOD(250 mg/L) 0.148 $288.50 $42.70 J $6.993.53 1,000 Lbs Industrial TSS(345 mg/L) 4.864 $432.14 $2,101.93 Sanitary TEE(250 mg/L) 0.148 S432.14 $63.96 $2,155.39 Total O&M Charge $10,282.46 Total Tax Credit ($163.37) all Net O&M Charge $10,119.09 SUPPLEMENTAL CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE(SCFCC)OVER BASELINE J Yeadv Baseline Allowlion: Flow(MG)0.0250 BOD(KLbs)0.185 TSS(KLbs)0.150 Charges Over Baseline Oven re Rafe Charge Industrial VOLUME MG 0,0000 $1001.00 $0.00 Industrial BOD 1,0D0 LBS 7.113 $289.10 $2.056.37 Industrial TEE 1,000 LBS 0.000 $187.15 $0.00 JSCFCC Charge $2.056.37 Total O&M and SCFCC Charges $12,176.46 V -UNIT BASIS IS ESTIMATED ON QUARTERLY USAGE"" THIS INVOICE IS DELINQUENT 081142006. TO BETTER SERVE YOU AND AS ONE OF YOUR PERMIT CONDITIONS,THE DISTRICT REQUIRES THAT YOUR FIRM SUBMIT COPIES OF YOUR WATER AND TAX BILLS AS OBTAINED-THANK YOU TOTAL 4th QUARTER INVOICE AMOUNT DUE $12,175.46 Orange County Sanitation District P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley.California 92728.8127 PHONE:1714)962-2411 p FAX: (714)962.3964 Invoice Date: 07102106 Invoice No.: 32726 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORMS Due Date: 08/16/06 �I 1120 N. ARMONDO Account No.: 24897 ANAHEIM CA 92806 ORIGINAL INVOICE INVOICE DUE DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NUMBER DATE J07/02/06 32726 08/16/06 Finance Charge 1,013.94 �1 J J 1 ••• Please Note Due Date ••• d •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• Total Amount Now Due 1.013.94 r it rl Orange County Sanitation District I 9 P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,Ce6turNe 92728-8127 PHONE: (714)962-2411 b FAX:1714)962-3954 rl Invoice Date: 08/02/06 Invoice No.: 32899 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORMS Due Date: 08/02/06 1120 N. ARMONDO Amount No.: 24897 ANAHEIM CA 92806 r' 1 ORIGINAL INVOICE J DATE INVOICE DUE NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 08/02/06 32899 O8/02/06 10% Penalty on Invoice 32513 119.77 J �I ..d "' Please Note Due Date "' " 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •' Total Amount Now Due 119.77 J d �I Orange County Sanitation District _I 'a P.O. Box 8127 Founteln Valley, CaPfomla 92728-8127 PHONE: 17141 962-2411 b FAX: (714) 962.3954 s� Invoice Date: 08/02/06 Invoice No.: 32909 J HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORMS Due Data: 09/16/06 1120 N. ARMONDO Account No.: 24897 ANAHEIM CA 92806 ORIGINAL INVOICE INVOICE DUE DATE NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION .AMOUNT 08/02/06 32909 09/16/06 Finance Charge 1,140.13 •'• Please Note Due Date ••• sj •• 10% Penalty on Pest Due Amount •' 1 Total Amount Now Due 1,140.13 s �I Orange County Sanitation District I f? P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CalNomle 92728-8127 PHONE:(714)962-2411 Ib ov FAX:(71419623954 r Invoice Date: 08/16/06 rl Invoice No.: 33017 I HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORMS Due Date: 08/16/06 1120 N. ARMONDO Account No.: 24897 ANAHEIM CA 92806 I ORIGINAL INVOICE INVOICE DUE DATE DESCRIPYION AMOUNTNUMBER DATE J08/16/06 33017 08/16/06 10% Penalty on Invoice 616204 1,000.00 J J J J J J J ••• Please Note Due Data ••• •• 1096 Penalty on Past Due Amount '• Total Amount Now Due 1,000.00 1 .r Orange County Sanitation District , Q P.O. Be. 8127 Fountain Valley,Cardomla 92728-8127 PHONE: (714) 962-2411 FAX: (714)962-3954 a7 Invoice Date: 09/05/06 Invoice No.: 33129 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORMS Due Date: 10/20/06 1120 N. ARMONDO Account No.: 24897 ANAHEIM CA 92806 ORIGINAL INVOICE • INVOICE DUE r DATE NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 09/05/06 33129 10/20106 Finance Charge 1,399.56 r r "` Please Note Due Date "' " 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount " Total Amount Now Due 1,399.56 r r EXHIBIT D r Hawk Industrial Uniform Notices of Violation and Wastewater Analysis Reports r r r r MHmA AGmin.ba*e Comps m1091206FINAM .•'''r•'�'"• ..OUNTY SANITAT ,N DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 6127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNU1927284127 109"ELLIa,FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CAUFORNIA 92706701E Syr (7141962.2411 November 10. 1994, s, REF 8491241.LTR Ralph Hawkins Hawk Industrial Uniform _ 1120 N. Armando St. Anaheim. CA 92806 r ,r SELF-MONITORING NOTICE OF VIOLATION Permit No: 2-1-079 Subject: Self-Monitoring Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: Oil & Grease r Rased upon the enclosed Self-Monitoring Wastewater Analysis Report for the sample collected on r September 19, 1994, your company was in violation of its permitted discharge limits and must resample for Oil & Grease. In response to this non-compliance, your company must take immediate corrective action and re-sample Its Industrial discharge by December 10. 1994. The results must be submitted to the Districts' Administration Office in Fountain Valley by December 30, 1994, r Failure to report within 30 days of the reporting due date may result in additional enforcement actions. These actions may include but are not limited to additional sampling and classification as a Significantly Non-Compliant (SNC) company. Should your company be identified as SNC, its name will be published in the Orange County Register as a significant violator. If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Chris Pelletier at (714) 962.2411, extension 3814. Mahin Talebi r Source Control Manager MT:hk Enclosure L r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 Source Control Division r SELF-MONITORING WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT r HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE: 10/26/94 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO: 2-1-079 ANAHEIM CA 92806 LAB. NO. : 57371 INSPECTOR: JC ATTN - RALPH HAWKINS SAMPLE TYPE: 5-2 r Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date: 09/19/94 Time: 1100 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours Actual Discharge MD (Million Gallons / Day) Mass Emission Rate Flow Base : .00500 NOD Effective : 05/10/94 r Discharge Permit Limit Over Limit r Violation Violation Cmmtit.ts mg/L lba/Dey ep/L Its/Day EGA Ibs/Day Percent Over Type Oil 8 Grease Min. 285.00 100.00 185.00 185.01 X r r r r Please address any owestimm ceneerning this report to Mr. Chris Pelletier at extension 3814. _ REVIEWED By 1 I� INSPECTOR 1/y se L INSPECTOR: COUNTY SANITATiuN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 6127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92]28-812] y� 10844 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 r "Wr fi` (714)962-2411 r December 14, 1994 REF p491405.LTR RUSTY HAWKINS, VICE-PRESIDENT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. ANAHEIM, CA 92806 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Permit No: 2-1-079 d Subject: Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: November 18, 1994 Based upon the enclosed Wastewater Analysis Report for Sample No. 42064 collected by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) on 11/18/94, your company was in violation of its permitted discharge limits. Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. The following summarizes the violation associated with your wastewater discharge: Constituent(s) in Violation Total Toxic Organics Violation of your permit discharge limits may result in additional enforcement actions against your company, including, but not limited to, non-compliance sampling fees and your company being r classified as Significantly Non-Compliant (SNCI. Should your company be identified as SNC, its name will be published in the newspaper as a significant violator. If you have any questions, please telephone the u signed at (7141 2-2411, extension 3812. a,es Bennie ounce Control Supervisor cc: CSDOC Inspector - JC ` J€AAVJOHNSTON ti County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 Source Control Division WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE: 12/05/94 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO: 2-1-079 ANAHEIM , CA 92806 LAB. NO. : 42064 INSPECTOR: JC ATTN RALPH HAWKINS SAMPLE TYPE: 2 Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: s Sample Date: 11/19/94 Time: 1000 Location: SEC Composite Hours Actual Discharge MGD (Million Gallons / Day) Mass Emission Rate Flow Base . 00500 MGD Effective : 05/10/94 me Discharge Permit Limit Over Limit Violation Violation Constituents MA lbs/Day W/L U s/Day mg/L kin/Day Percent Over Type r 624 7.13 0.02 624-TTO 2.04 O.n 624-Mist. 5.10 0.0% d Total Toxic Organics 2.D4 0.58 1.46 251.01 x w m Please address any questions concerning this report to Mr. James Beatie at extension 3812. REVIEVED By INSPECTOR: rr / i1 L INSPECTOR: ,. County Sanitation Districts of Orange county Purgeable Hydrocarbons, Method 624 Industry Name: HAWK INDUSTRIAL Green Sheet 1: 42064 Sample Desc. : GRAB Sample Date: 11/18/94 Inspector: JC Date Analyzed: 11/22/94 Analyst: ML Dil. Factor: 50.00 Results DL Compound (ug1L) (ua/M " 1,1, 1-Trichloroethane ND <10.5 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND <19.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane NO <12.5 y' 1,1-Dichloroethane ND <12.5 1, 1-Dichloroethene ND <14.0 1,2-Dichloroethane ND <11. 5 s, 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND <16.0 1,2-Dichloropropane ND <14.0 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND <20.5 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND <20.0 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether ND <33. 5 2-Hexanone* ND <22.5 Acetone* 1, 500.0 <125. 0 ® Acrolein* ND <135.0 Acrylonitrile* ND <19.0 Bromodichloromethane ND <9.5 Bromomethane ND <31.5 Benzene ND <13.0 Bromoform ND <11.5 Chlorobenzene ND <10.5 Carbon Tetrachloride ND <14.0 Chloroethane ND <22.5 Chloroform 45.0 <9.5 d Chloromethane ND <14.5 Carbon Disulfide* ND <20.0 Dibromochloromethane ND <9.5 Ethylbenzene 394.0 <8.5 2-Butanone* ND <40.0 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone* 138.0 <24.5 Methylene Chloride 104.0 <13.5 Styrene* 36.0 <12.5 Trichloroethene ND <10.0 Trichlorof luoromethane ND <15.0 m Toluene 1, 467. 0 <13.5 Tetrachloroethene 26.0 <9.5 Vinyl Acetate* 157. 0 <60. 0 Vinyl Chloride ND <18.0 m-Xylene, p-Xylene* 2, 019.0 <15.0 11/30/94 Page 1 of 2 County Sanitation Districts of orange county Purgeable Hydrocarbons, Method 624 Industry Name: HAWK INDUSTRIAL Green Sheet 1: 42064 Sample Desc. : GRAB Sample Date: 11/18/94 m Inspector: JC Date Analyzed: 11/22/94 Analyst: ML Dil. Factor: 50.00 e Results DL compound WUL) fua/L) cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO <8.5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND <8. 5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene NO <11. 0 d o-Xylene+ 1, 248 .0 <8.5 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND <6.5 d Total Method 624 Compounds: 7,134.0 µg/L (total of detected sample results) a Verified By: ML Date Verified: 11/30/94 Comments: ND = none detected Method 624 (EPA, 40 CFR Part 136, Federal Register, October 1984) DL = Detection Limit (ug/L) . Revised 09/01/93 • Nonregulated Purgeable Hydrocarbons a a a a w 11/30/94 Page 2 of 2 ICOUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS _ y < OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 106"ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ul 'M[cap 1714)962-2411 'I September 26, 1996 REF #691101.LTR r RUSTY HAWKINS, VICE PRESIDENT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. ,y ANAHEIM, CA 92806 NOTICE OF VIOLATION a Permit No: 2-1-079 sI Subject: Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: September 11, 1996 s Based upon the enclosed Wastewater Analysis Report for Sample No. 50818 collected by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) on 09f11 f96, your company was in violation of its permitted discharge limits. Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. a' The following summarizes the violation associated with your wastewater discharge: Constituenals) in Violation e1 Total Toxic Organics Violation of your permit discharge limits may result in additional enforcement actions against your company, including, but not limited to, non-compliance sampling fees and your company being classified as Significantly Non-Compliant (SNC). Should your company be identified as SNC, its name will be published in the newspaper as a significant violator, s If you have any questions, please telephone the undersigned at (714) 962-2411, extension 3812. ew � _ ames Benzie Source Control Supervisor cc: CSDOC Inspector - DL a a e• e+ _ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. BOX 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 s' Source Control Division _ WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE: 09/24/96 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO: 2-1-079 ANAHEIM CA 92806 LAB. NO. : 50818 INSPECTOR: DL ATTN RALPH HAWKINS SAMPLE TYPE: 2 _ Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: mr Sample Date : 09/11/96 Time: 1400 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours Actual Discharge MOD (Million Gallons / Day) Mass Emission Rate Flow Base . 01000 MOD Effective : 05/01/96 Discharge permit Limit Over Limit Violation Violation Cemtitumnts mg/L lhs/Day mVL lbs/C" mg/L lbs/Day percmt Over Type a 626-TTO 1.70 0.0% 624-Mist. 0.37 0.0% 626 2.07 0.0% Total Toxic Organics 1.70 0.58 1.12 192.6% % mm a as son please a mss any qu tiom comerni,g this report to Mr. Jamem ssmie at utmmim 7812. REVIEYED BY py. INSPECTOR: 1 Hw/L.� [z jq,6 a+ L INRPECTDR: PAA1 ��LS-J,(o - r t_,OUNTY SANITATIviJ DISTRICTS " tffi1! OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA R.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92 7 26-81 2 7 [� 10344 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92706-7018 [ � (714)962-2411 December 2, 1996 REF F694349.LTR RUSTY HAWKINS, VICE PRESIDENT °r HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. ANAHEIM, CA 92806 ,N NOTICE OF VIOLATION Permit No: 2-1-079 e[ Subject: Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: October 24, 1996 a Based upon the enclosed Wastewater Analysis Report for Sample No. 51726 collected by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) on 10/24/96, your company was in violation of its permitted discharge limits. Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. To s verify that all necessary corrective measures have been taken to resolve the non-compliance, the Districts will re-sample your company's wastewater discharge in the near future. The following summarizes the violation and the fees associated with the Districts re-sampling your wastewater discharge: Constituents) in Violation Total Toxic Organics a Laboratory Analysis Fee: S 219 Non-mmpliance Processing & Sampling Fee: S 500 90 Total Fee: $ 719 An invoice for the amount presented above will be sent to your company under separate cover. Please 1p notify your Accounts Payable Department to assure timely payment to avoid additional enforcement actions against your company. Violation of your permit discharge limits may result in additional enforcement actions against your company, including, but not limited to, non-compliance sampling fees and your company being classified as Significantly Non-Compliant (SNC). Should your company be identified as SNC, its name will be published in the newspaper as a significant violator. If you have any questions, please telephone the and i ed at 17141 2-2411, eMension 3812. a , es Bennie a+ urce Control Su visor Enclosure cc: CSDOC Accounts Receivable F' CSDOC Inspector - DL r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 ,r Source Control Division r WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE: 11/13/96 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO: 2-1-079 ANAHEIM CA 92806 LAB. NO. : 51726 INSPECTOR: DL ATTN RALPH HAWKINS SAMPLE TYPE: 2C .M Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date: 10/24/96 Time: 0930 Location: SAMPLE BOX " Composite Hours Actual Discharge MGD (Million Gallons / Day) a Mass Emission Rate Flow Base .01000 MGD Effective : 05/01/96 Discharge Permit Limit Over Limit Violation Violation Comtituents mR/L lbe/Day mB/L Lba/Dey sal/L Lba/Day Percent Over Type 624-TTO S.D4 0.0% 624-Mies. 0.71 0.0% 624 5.76 0.0% a Total Toxic Organics 5.04 0.55 4.46 769.5% MAJOR a a a a Please address a tions any Wes concerning this retort to Mr. James Benzie at extermi en 3812. ae REVIENEO By ( L/ G INSPECTOR: .)` a L INSPECTOR:ftL I1-14-S�o County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Purgeable Hydrocarbons, Method 624 Industry Name : HAWK INDUSTRIAL Green Sheet # : 51726 Sample Desc . : MATH AVE Sample Date: 10/24/96 Inspector: DL Date Analyzed: 10/25/96 Analyst: ML Dil. Factor: 10.00 ti Results DL Compound (uc/L) (ua/L) 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane ND <2. 1 1, 1, 2 , 2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0 . 8 1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane ND <2. 5 ++ 1, 1-Dichloroethane ND <2. 5 1, 1-Dichloroethene ND <2 . 8 1, 2-Dichloroethane ND <2 . 3 1, 2-Dichlorobenzene NO 0 . 2 1, 2-Dichloropropane NO <2 . 8 1, 3-Dichlorobenzene ND <4. 1 1, 4-Dichlorobenzene ND <4. 0 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether NO <6 . 7 2-Hexanone• ND <4. 5 Acetone- 134. 0 <25 . 0 Acrolein- ND <27 .0 Aerylonitrile• ND 0. 8 Bromodichloromethane NO <1 . 9 Bromomethane ND <6. 3 Benzene NO <2. 6 Bromoform ND <2. 3 Chlorobenzene ND <2. 1 Carbon Tetrachloride ND <2. 8 Chloroethane ND <4 . 5 Chloroform 34 . 0 <1. 9 Chloromethane ND <2. 9 Carbon Disulfide* ND <2 . 0 Dibromochloromethane ND <1 .9 Ethylbenzene 71. 0 <1. 7 2-Butanone• 31. 0 <8. 0 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone• ND <4 . 9 Methylene Chloride 7 . 0 <2 . 7 .+ Styrene- 8 .4 <2. 5 Trichloroethene ND <2 . 0 Trichlorofluoromethane ND <3 . 0 Toluene 4, 682 . 0 <2 . 7 Tetrachloroethene 249 . 0 <1 . 9 Vinyl Acetate- ND <12. 0 Vinyl Chloride ND 0 . 6 m-Xylene, p-Xylene* 255 . 0 <3 . 0 11/06/96 Page 1 of 2 I r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Purgeable Hydrocarbons, Method 624 r Industry Name : HAWK INDUSTRIAL Green Sheet #: 51726 Sample Desc . : MATH AVE Sample Date: 10/24/96 r Inspector: DL Date Analyzed: 1O/25/96 Analyst: ML Dil. Factor: 10. 00 r Results DL Compound (ug/L) (ac/L) cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene NO <1. 7 trans-1, 2-Dichloroethene NO <1 . 7 trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene ND <2. 2 r o-Xylene• 285 . 0 <1. 7 cis-1, 2-Dichloroethene NO <1 . 3 d Total Method 624 Compounds: 5,756.4 µg/L (total of detected sample results) Verified By: ML Date Verified: 11/06/96 r Comments : ND = none detected ti Method 624 (EPA, 40 CFR Part 136, Federal Register, October 1984) DL = Detection Limit (ug/L) . Revised 09/01/93 Nonregulated Purgeable Hydrocarbons r r r r T 11/06/96 Page 2 of 2 r • �C110.1Cf I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. Box 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272"127 b b 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 1714) 982-2411 November 16, 1998 REF #8908821TR LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER _ HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. ANAHEIM, CA 92806 NOTICE OF VIOLATION - Permit No: 2-1-079 Subject: Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: September 10, 1998 Based upon the enclosed Wastewater Analysis Report for Sample No. 71350 collected by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) on 09/10/98, your company was in violation of - its permitted discharge limits. Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. The following summarizes the violation associated with your wastewater discharge: Constituent(s) in Violation Oil & Grease Min. Violation of your permit discharge limits may result in additional enforcement actions against _ your company, including, but not limited to, non-compliance sampling fees and your company being classified as Significantly Non-Compliant (SNC). Should your company be identified as SNC, its name will be published in the newspaper as a significant violator. If you have any questions, please telephone the undersigned at 1714) 962-2411, extension 3812. James Be,,,. Source Control Supervisor d cc: CSDOC Inspector - MS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellie Avenue P.O. Box 8127 . Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 r Source Control Division r WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE: 10/19/98 r 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO: 2-1-079 ANAHEIM CA 92806 LAB. NO. : 71350 INSPECTOR: MS r ATTN RUSTY HAWKINS SAMPLE TYPE: 2 - Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows : Sample Date: 09/10/98 Time : 1330 Location: SEC _ Composite Hours r Actual Discharge MGD (Million Gallons / Day) Mass Emission Rate Flow Base . 01600 MGD Effective : 05/01/98 r Discharge Permit Limit Over Limit Violation Violation Conatftuenn MIRA tbs/Day m/L Ibs/Day mg/L tM/Day Percent Over Type r _ Oft B Breese Min. 301.00 2DO.00 101.00 50.5% X r r r r Ptease address any g mmtiom concerning thta report to Mr. James Senate at eatemim 3812. r REVIEWED DT �1 ,r INSPECTOR: /J. / loll j1q e M( r LINSPECi00.: V Itr/�I r I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT March 12, 1999 (7141 96 2-241 1 LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER m.I . m 81"27: HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM .. Pa ea. raanwln W.,ca 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. 92728-812] ANAHEIM, CA 92606 elie Arenas %un raun[eln Valley,CP 927a8-7018 Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING ,r Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: January 26, 1999 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 174709 collected by the Orange County Sanitation District on 01/26199, your company was in violation of its permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: CBae. -+ McMim Constituent(s) In Violation a ea auena part Total Toxic organics Ly". r ftuMtn OMW Fuulerrm Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may man rao.a result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to °"°`°"s°°`" ur Your company beingclassified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC)• Should our company Y a be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a 14 Pal'"° Los significant violator. significant I Newport eaecM1 You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance determination Plac.npa same A. in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. sealeae.M1 .y szr w ou have any q bons, please telephone Jim Benzie at (714)593-7444. Irmo Pert IYarbe lines ,r .... .1 CO.,. mes Benzie ource Control Su rvisor r Code Mesa "away Car c: OCSD Accounts Receivable OCSD Inspector- MS OCSD Engineer- MHK ovine Rancu r r � I 'TO Pfatvcc MO Public HealN and the Emmm,ment Br ugh Excellence in Wastaw.ter Syxams- r I ( County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 r Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 ,r Source Control Division WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT rHAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE: 02/23/99 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO: 2-1-079 r ANAHEIM , CA 92806 LAB. NO. : 174709 INSPECTOR: MS ATTN RUSTY HAWKINS SAMPLE TYPE: 2 r Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows : Sample Date: 01/26/99 Time: 1300 Location: SBC sm Composite Hours Actual Discharge MGD (Million Gallons / Day) r Mass Emission Rate Flow Base .01600 MGD Effective : 05/01/98 Discharge Permit Limit Over Limit r Violation Violation Cmrtittents M/L Ibs/Day CWL lbs/Der Midi. lbs/Day Percent Over Type r 624•Misc. 93.53 0.0% 624-TTO 88.32 O.Ox 624 191.84 0.0% r Total Toxic organies 86.32 O.SM 87.74 •*-saK x r r r Please address arty OiMstiam conceminm this report to Mr. James Mantis at extersion 3812. r RWIENEO MT INSPECTOR: r L INSPECTOR: .� _ r t � LIMS-SC Interface Report-Completed Green Sheets r ,� Green Sbat N 1 470 - Parmit 2-1-079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM LIPAS N 174,709.00 Collected 1/26199 by Merril Seiler Lab Released Date 2l1 M r 62,_SC 1,1,1-trichloroethane < 38.00 UG_L vinyl acetate < 520.00 UG_L 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethme 1504.00 UG_L vinyl chloride < 580.00 UG_L r 1,1,2-trichloroethme 444.00 UG_L _ 1,1-dichloroethane < 19.00 UG_L 41-dichloroethene < 138.00 UG_L r 1,2-0ichlorober"ne < 26.00 UG_L 1,2dchloroaftm < 34.00 UG_L 1,2dchloropropane 1944.00 UG_L 0-dichlorobeozene < 26.00 UG_L 1,4dchlorobeamne < 38.00 UG L 2-butanone 3994.00 UG_L 2-chloroethylvinyl ether .< 46.00 UG_L 2-hexmone < 295.00 UG_L 4-methyl-2-pemenme < 215.00 UG_L r acetone 47005.00 UG_L acrulom < 640.00 UG_L acrylonitrile < 320.00 UG_L benane 1940.00 UG_L bmmodichloromethme 2220.00 UG_L r bromofmm < 42.00 UG_L bromomethme < 640.00 UG_L carbon disulfide < 200.00 UG_L ,r cariwn tetrachloride < 58.00 UG L chlombenuue < 24.00 UG_L chloroethane < 800.00 UG_L r chloroform < 34.00 UG_L chlmomethme .< 700.00 UG_L cis-1,2-dichloroedi m < 30.00 UG L r cis-1,3dchloropropme < 42.00 UG_L _ dibromoehlommethme < 64.00 UG_L ' ethylbenane 3639.00 UG_L m,p-xylmm 17292.00 UG_L methylene chloride 10594.00 UG L o-xylene 24456.00 UG_L r styrene 780.00 UG_L tetrachloraethene 2478.00 UG_L toluene 63575.00 UG_L r sans-1,2-dichloroethene < 68.00 UG_L trans-1,3-dichlompropme < 40.00 UG_L nichloroedme 130.00 UG_L trichlom0uoromad me < 360.00 UG L r Printed 2r23M 10:23 Results_byCompletedGSs Page 25 of 67 I " ORANGE COUNTY SANITATI&i DISTRICT _I _I �I PIM": March 12, 1999 01419a2-2411 A.0 LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER Pa ea.9127 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM raa ii valley.ra 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. ,rl 92725-8127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 1 ramt u ens MA e'in valW icv.ra _I 9270 701e Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: January 26, 1999 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 _I re,m.t Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 174710 collected by Apenc1ea the Orange County Sanitation District on 01/26/99, your company was in violation of its permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: _I Clau ,N*na;m Constrtuent(s) In Violation ere*I aeon*Park Oil g Grease Min. rowveina inlay Fwia,mn Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to Beach aa your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company L.H*Me be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a La ba significant violator. _I iv*,roan e**m 0-11a You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance determination sanm nine in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. Seel each Sianzan 7u,aun you I have any uestions, please telephone Jim Benzie at (714)593-7444. Vila*Pert Irwm L�nda nc, a o.•nc* ames Benzie ource Control Supervisor Flea,y ol*aict. rCoab Was midv*y my c: OCSD Accounts Receivable J .*. Gi"Ha.. OCSD Inspector- MS OCSD Engineer- MHK Irvine R ncn JI J J 'b Protect the Public H9*IN and mu EnInment through E+cellence in wastewater Syst*ma- I r rr County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 d Source Control Division ur WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE: 02/17/99 1120 N. ARMANDOST. PERMIT NO: 2-1-079 ANAHEIM CA 92806 LAB. NO. : 174710 INSPECTOR: MS ATTN RUSTY HAWKINS SAMPLE TYPE: 2 a. Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date: 01/26/99 Time: 1255 Location: SBC Composite Hours Actual Discharge MGD (Million Gallons / Day) Mass Emission Rate Flow Base .01600 MGD Effective : 05/01/98 r Discharge Permit Limit Over Limit Violation Vitiation Constituents OWL lbs/Day ma/L lbs/Day mg/L lbs/Day Percent Over Type r Oil 8 Grease Min. 940.00 200.00 740.00 370.0% % r 6w r .r s Please address any questions; concerning this report to Mr. James Benzie at extension 3812, r REVIEWED BY INSPECTOR:V/r L INSPECTOR: le ORANGE COUNTY SANITATIOIN DISTRICT � I Iv November 8, 1999 17141962-2411 ILARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER "°Nnpedd.: HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM P.Q Bo,8127 F .,,w1w..ra 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. 92728-8127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 ,y I .Cast dd .: ,0 aia4.v.,w. ra'JnC.ln waw..C.. I sz7oa7o1e Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: September 9, 1999 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 M.mber Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 216755 collected by °pendi° the Orange County Sanitation District on 09/09/1999, your company was in violation of its permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: I c1°Iaa �' nnaheim Constituent(s) In Violation m I sues.Pal* Total Toxic Organics 0YPree. FOYn F,IIB ll.y Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may ca-een result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company m� I.e H.ba be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a Ivaleta significant violator. nawg.rz aaaw or.ng. You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance determination Saito;°a in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. es I seal Beech sudtO" )Jesu have any qua ns, pleasedelephone Jim Benzie at(714)593-7444. ruaon Yille Park ' r Lmroe uwe ..ry 10 rana. Benzie rce Control Supervisor d Lnleary Oleteien oly c: OCSD Accounts Receivable M. Mtitley OCSD Inspector-AC waeae DlaeNeea OCSD Engineer-JT Irvine Rench sl �I sl 70%ima Me Public HeelM and the EnvbanmeM M.gb E a lenCe in VVe.rBwaler$yamms- Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue r P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 Source Control Division w WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT w HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 09/17/1999 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 w ANAHEIM, CA 92805 LAB NO. 216755 INSPECTOR AC Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE 2 w Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: w Sample Date 09/09/1999 Time : 0950 Location: END OF PIPE-CLARIFIER Composite Hours a Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base : 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/ Day) Effective : Dlscbame Permit Limit Over Limit Violation Violation constituents mull- Ibs/Day mgA. Ihs/Da mall. lbs/Day Percent Over Tyoe 624 2.24 0.0 624-Misc. 074 0.0 w MT6E < 0.01 0.00 0.0 Total Toxic Organic 1.50 0.56'; ' '`:0.92 w Please addrManyquestions concerning this report to Jim Benzle at 714-593-7444-REVIEWED 6Y r P r P r LIMS-SC Interface Report-Completed Green Sheets rGreen Sheet f! 216 IA 755 Permit 2-1-079 HAWK INDUSTRL UNIFORM LIMS k 216,755.00 Collected 9/7/99 by Arnold Chavez Lab Released Date 9/15/99 r 624 SC 1,1,1-trichloroethane < 7.60 UG_L r' 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane < 6.40 UG_L 1,1,2.trichloroethme < 720 UG_L 1,1-dichloroethme < 3.60 UG L 1,1-dichlemethene < 27.60 UG_L 1,2-dichlorobenzme < 5.20 UG_L 1,2-dichlormthane < 6.90 UG_L r 1,2-dichloropropme < 9.60 UG_L 1,3-dichlorobenzene < 5.20 UG_L 1,4-dichlorobenzene < 7.60 UG_L r 2-butmone 99.40 UGL _ 2-chlomethytvinyl ether < 920 UG__L 2-hexanone < 23.60 UG_L ,. 4-methyl-2-penrmone < 17.20 UG_L MTBE < 8.00 UG_L acetone 408.00 UG_L ,r acrolein < 128.00 UG_L acrylonitrlle < 64.00 UGL benzene < 4.00 UG__L bromodichloromethme 30.40 UG_L bromoforat < 8.40 UG_L bromomethane < 128.00 UG_L r carbon disulfide < 40.00 UG L carbon tetrachloride < 11.60 Uri chlombenzene < 4.80 UG__L chloroethane < 160.00 UGL r chloroform < 6.80 UG__L chloromethme < 140.00 UGL cis-1,2-dichloroethene < 6.00 UG__L cis-1,3-dichlorupropene < 8.40 UG_L dibromochloromethane < 12.80 UG_L ethylbenzene 28.40 UGL i1 m,p-xylenes 130.00 UG_L methylene chloride < 44.00 UG_L c-xylene 105.00 UG_L p-bromotlu trobenzene 809.60 UG_L styrene < 6.40 UG_L tetrachloroethene 43.60 UG L r toluene 1370.00 UG_L trans-1 2-dichloroethene < 13.60 UG_L tans-1,3-dichloropropene 30.40 UGL r trichloroethene < 9.90 UG__L trichlomfluoromethme < 72.00 UG_L vinyl acetate < 104.00 UG_L r vinyl chloride < 116.00 UG_L r Printed 9116199 9:43 Results_byCompletedGS.r page 2) of 60 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT � I November 8, 1999 014)982-2411 LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER intPC 8.8127 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM PC Boa B127 rauntaln Vevey.CA 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. 9272E-8127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 ,y .c,eec.4drms: 10844 Ela Avenue fauncain Valley.CA. I 92708.7016 Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING s, Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: September 9, 1999 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 Iac, Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 216756 collected by the Orange County Sanitation District on 09/09/1999, your company was in violation of its I permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: Mine Anaheim Constituent(s) In Violation Brea I _ _Beene Perk Oil&Grease Min. cypress Founmin 1euey Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may Pullermn Barden result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to Huntlngmn Seem Irvine your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company Haber be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a Pahn. significant violator. L.Nemites I Nawperc Beach Orange You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance determination Pleeen . seen Ana in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. Seal Beach � .n Jurcse uhave any q stions, please telephone Jim Benzie at (714)593-7444. wle Park //tbrba Undo 7-1 / _1 t� of or..9n eBenzie Control Supervisor ma {nlury olaeHttc Costa Mesa Midway Gay c: OCSD Accounts Receivable OCSD Inspector-AC Iwaenr Ul.crincs OCSD Engineer-JT r Irvine Bann _ I _ i _ I ` Ta Pmmct me Public Health and the Ennranenenr chnewn Excellence in wastewater Systems' ( t Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 Source Control Division WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 09/15/1999 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 216756 _ INSPECTOR AC Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE : 2 Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date 09/09/1999 Time : 0950 Location: END OF PIPE-CLARIFIER Composite Hours Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons I Day) Effective: Dlsehame Permit Limit Over Limit Violation violation r Constituents MAIL IbWDW m9fL IWI mofiL ItrelDay Percent Over T 0116-Grease Min. 254.00',:, 2. 00:00; ^^r30:Oey -,5;.'j 37D: Please address any questions concerning this report to Jim Benzie at 714-593-7444. REVIEWED ayqi� ORANGE COUNTY SANITATILII� DISTRICT rl - ae I r I March 2, 2000 rbrnr' LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER (714)992-2411 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM I .rill..atld .% 1120 N.ARMANDO ST P.O. 8m 8127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 Po Meln valley,rA I 92728-8127 ,r .rna..a : Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICT'S MONITORING 1G344 elm Aaen.. Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: November 30, 1999 F Urumin v aw..CA I 927 7019 Re: Permit No:2-1-079 r Based upon the enclosed Wastewater Analysis Report for Sample No. 231886 collected by the I Orange County Sanitation District on 1 113 0/1 9 9 9, your company was in violation of Its permitted a,, Mambr industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: •undo � Constituent(s)in Violation I crol.. Oil&Grease Min. "tl Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may result In Anehe m are, additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to your tympany euen.P.r* being classified as Significantly Noncompliant(SNC). Should your company be classified as P.un[.in�PY§IIeY SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a significant violator. W11.rt Ic. m a"I'B To verify that all necessary corrective measures have been taken to resolve the noncompliance. a"nbna1O"Mom. the District will resample your wmpany's wastewater discharge in the near future. The following L.H.br. summarizes the fees associated with the Districts resampling your wastewater discharge: [ Palma L.e Alamitos rl rv.tln.rt e...n Laboratory Analysis Fee: $ 74 q ena. nw M. Non-compliance Processing 8 Sampling Fee: $ 500 I 3.n a Ana seal ee.ch Total Fee: $ 574 r S amm T 8°^ An Invoice for the amount presented above will be sent to your company under separate woe P. eaver.Please no our Accounts Payable Department to assure time) Ybro. Linn. [ Y Y P y payment to avoid additional enforcement actions against your tympany. � aunty 0 Ormpn You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance determination in Fries, or.crmc. accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. r Mv' "ay If you have any estions,please telephone Jim Benzie at(714)593-7444. r Irvin.Ranch '.tames Benzie Source Control Su ervisor rl 1 c: OCSDAcwunts Receivable �- OCSD Inspector-AC r I OCSD Engineer-JT rl 'r.PrcW. t 0.Public Heath end N.Enrir.nm.nt tnr.wh&c.11.nce in Ma.w.t.r Systems" Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 P Source Control Division WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT s HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 01242000 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO : 2-1-079 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 231886 INSPECTOR AC Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE 2C T Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: a Sample Date 11/30/1999 Time : Location: END OF PIPE-CLARIFIER Composite Hours +r Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base : 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : Discharge Permit Umit Over Llma Violation Violation T CormtlfmrMi ma/ lbtDy Mon. IbS08Y mail. lbsfDay Pec nt Over Tvae Oil B Grease Min, 348.00 200.00 148.00 74.0 MAJOR Please address any questions conceming this report to Jim Benzie at 714-593-7444. REVIEWED BY T _ / P a Y r r 9^ ORANGE COUNTY SANITAT. .J DISTRICT ,"•n<: June 5, 2003 141 962-2411 191962036fi LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER ^�®^ HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM Whop.ear...: 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. P.Q am,aya 1.a127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 'n Ve� CA E_ 9227 p•Mr,etllmt Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING az7ce-7o1e Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 6, 2003 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 "g� Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 612938 collected by 0 the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/06/2003, your company was in violation of its cam•• permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: Nw wim s,ee Constituent(s) In Violation cypess Total Toxic Orgenlea r inn Veiny Fe11e Nn wnaen owe Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to mna r.e Heae your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company �I^�• be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a significant violator. rZE_ �„ A1e You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance see,eexn determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. s��1m9 Tustin une Park If yqu have any questions, please telephone Kelly Christensen at (714)593-7420. Kelly Christensen Principal Environmental Specialist M neee ,wdwer Cgr r, olswm c: OCSD Inspector - MR Wine Rencn OCSD Engineer - MSK _ s To msm[sm worle class lestlersniv m was[ewe[er ene weer resource management. Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 Source Control Division r WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT r HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 05/27/2003 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1.079 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 612938 INSPECTOR MR Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE : 2 r Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: r Sample Date 05/06t2003 Time : 1115 Location: Composite Hours Actual Discharge r Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : Di.charas Permit Limit Over Limit Violation Violation r constituent, mall- IbSON M9j6 IeslDav -afL to Percentovar TY00 624 19.261 0.0 624-Moc. 6.990 0.0 r MTYiB1E a ♦0..y0�088 0.00 0.0 ( �+��a�{ee 12ryN r r Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. REVIEWED BY r r r r r LP4SSC Intarrm Report-Completed Grem Shod cram Sheets 612938 Pule 2-1-079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM LINES a 612938 Collected by Mike Reideler lab Released Data 523/03 r 620 SC 1,1,1-trichlometham < 7.60 UG_L r I 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethaoe < 6.40 UG_L 1,1,2-tichloroethane < 7.20 UG_L 1,1-dichloroetheoe < 3.60 UG_L r I 1,1-dichloroedtane < 27.60 UG-L 1,2-dichlombeazme < 5.20 UG_L 1,2dichlorcetham < 6.80 UGL 1,2-dichloro < 9.60 UG__L r 1,3dichllorobmzme < 5.20 UG_L p 1,4-dichlorobmuae < 7.60 UGL �we r I 2-bu 711.00 UG__L 2-clik road ylviayl ether < 9.20 UG-L 2-hexaome < 23.60 UG L 4•methyl-2-pmtanom 65.40 UG_L acat n 3920.00 UG-L aerolem < 128.00 UG L aerylomWe < 64.00 UG_L bmane < 4.00 UG_L bromodichlorometham < 8.80 UGL bromoform < 8.40 UGL a" bromomelhaae < 128.00 UGL carton disulfide - < 40.00 UG___L carbon mtrachamide < 11.60 UG_L chlombenxme < 4.80 UG_L chloroethane < 160.00 UG_L r Ichloroform 17,20 UGL chlortmetha e < 140.00 UG__L cis-1,2dichlometheme < 6.00 UG-L cis-1,3-dichlompropme < 8.40 UGL �r dibrochloromtthaoe < 12.80 UG_L ethylbemme 206.00 UG_L mp-xylenea 1280.00 UG_L r methylene chloride < 44.00 UG_L MTBE < 8.00 UG_L r i o-xylem: 987.00 UG_L styrene 26.60 UGL tetrachloroetheme < 12.40 UG_L r Itoluene 12000.00 UG_L trans-1,2dichloroethem < 13.60 UG_L m tra -1,3-dichloropropeme < 8.00 UG_L r trwhlorocthene 48.10 UG_L dichbrolluorormthane < 72.00 UGL vinyl acetate < 104.00 UG__L vinyl chloride < 116.00 UG_L r ( _ I rated 5242003 6:25 Results bvCommoletadGS.mt P.M 17 of At ORANGE COUNTY SANITATIGIv DISTRICT %';• January 19, 2004 LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM { 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. ANAHEIM, CA 92806 Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: December 23, 2003 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 695078 collected by the Orange County Sanitation District on 12123/2003, your company was in violation of its permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: i Constituent(s) In Violation Total Toxic Organic Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company be classed as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a significant violator. You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. _ If yo h e any questions, please telephone Kelly Christensen at (714)593-7420. Kelly Christensen Source Control Supervisor c: OCSD Inspector- DF OCSD Engineer- MSK nY . . r _ I I Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 Source Control Division WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 01/13/2004 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 695078 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE : 2 Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date 12/23/2003 Time : Location: BELOW GROUND CLARI Composite Hours Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : Dlsehame Permit Limit Oyer Limit Violation Violation ' Constituents ma/L lbs/Dav TafL IbslDav mga: IbslOav Percent Over Tvim 624 41.359 0.0 624-Mise. 25.619 0.0 M1BE < 0.020 0.00 0.0 Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. REVIEWED By 1 - ( S LIMS-SC Interface Report-Completed Green Sheer, ,r 1 Gran Sheet 9 695078 Permll 2-1-079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM r LU/S# 695078 Collected by David Frmcis Lab Released Date 1/12/04 624_SC ,r �I 1,1,1-triehloroetbaoe < 19.00 UG_L 1,1,2,2-tetmchloroethane < 16.00 UG_L I 1,1,2-trichloroetharee 155.00 UG L d 1,1-dichloroethane < 9.00 UG_L 1,1-dieWoroethene < 69.00 UGL 1,2-dichlorobenzene < 13.00 UG_L 1,2-dichloroedme < 17.00 UG L 1,2-dichlmopropene < 480.00 UG-L 1,3-dichlorobenzene < 13.00 UGL 1,4-dichlorobeetzene < 19.00 UGL 2-butanone < 140.00 UG_L I 2-chloroethylvinyl ether < 23.00 UGL r 2-hexanone 99.10 UG__L 4-methyl-2-pentanom < 43.00 UGL acetone 15200.00 UG_L acrolein < 320.00 UGL acrylonitrile < 160.00 UG_L benzene < 10.00 UGL bromadichloromethane 27.60 UG_L 'y brom lee m < 21.00 UG-L bromomethane < 320.00 UG L carbon disulfide < 100.00 UG L carbon tetrachloride < 29.00 UG_L chlombenzene < 12.00 UG L chloroctleam < 400.00 UGL chloroform 308.00 UG_L chlorornethane < 350.00 UG_L I cis-1,2-dichloroethem < 15.00 UGL r cis-1,3dichlompmpene < 21.00 UG__L dibrorrmchlorometime < 32.00 UG_L ethylbeozene 828.00 UG_L m,p-xylenes 2370.00 UG_L ruethylene chloride < 110.00 UG_L r( MTBE < 20.00 UG L o-xylene 7720.00 UG_L styrene 230.00 UG_L tetmchloroethene 8020.00 UG L ,r I toluene 6350.00 UG L trans-1,2-dichloruethene < 34.00 UQ L trans-1,3-dichlarepropene < 20.00 UG-L ,r trichloroethene 51.20 UG_L triehloroflucromethane < 180.00 UG-L ..I vinyl acetate < 260.00 UG-L vinyl chloride < 290.00 UG-L rl ORANGE COUNTYSANITA' ,_. DISTRICT �I el— June 23, 2004 ~ 17141 SM 2411 1(]141982035 "5 LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER r OaW.®I(.aall HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. vo emai27 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 antam wle,,,ra .+ 9272a9127 .n...alarm: a40.,MG A'�nYe Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING nc927()8-7 ra sn❑ea❑19 Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 27, 2004 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 A^n. Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 749618 collected by • the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/27/2004, your company was in violation of its citi.. permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: �I Anaheim - Constituent(s) In Violation area guena van cireaa Total Toxic Organics r(� Many leltdn Gard.FalGro. Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may w,gton Beam result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to °ibna our company beingclassified as Significantly Noncompliant SNC Should our company r Le M. be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published inthe newspaper as a L.miandus significant violator. r �m R�aae14la You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the noncompliance Sant,Ana so,Baem determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. amn= T16rk If you have an questions, lease telephone Kell Christensen at 714 593-7420. was von Y Y 9 P P Y ( ) I l bnea �pry of Or.nae Kelly Christensen ry olxx4e. Source Control Supervisor Costs Ma.. Mldway Gay rf° °igtrlg 6 c: OCSD Inspector- DF I uz.;no Ranch OCSD Engineer- MH �I r) To mamram world class Inadersh,in wesrewarer end water resource management. _ I Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 Source Control Division d WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT a HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 06/10/2004 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 749618 INSPECTOR OF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE 2 v Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: r Sample Date 05/27/2004 Time : 0930 Location : CLARIFIER Composite Hours Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : echa a Permit Limes Over Lim Violation Violation ,r Constituents mn/L Ihe/Dnv mOIL Ih.M. mo/L 16sfDav Percant OT. TvM 624 65.770 0.0 MTBE < 0.052 0.00 0.0 SEC- 1.280 0,0 BUTYLBENZENE 8 NHS ; $ ;: qS ti : s: x« 17: i ttis :;S ' Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. REVIEWED BY K r r LIMSSC Interface Report-Completed Grcea Sheets Green sheet a 749618 Permit 2-1-079 HAWK WDUSTRIAL UNIFORM I LIMS N 749619 Collected by David Francis Lab Released Date 6/9/04 r 624 SC 1,1,1,2-tetmchlormdme < 92.00 UG-L dibromomethane < 72.00 UGL 1,1,1-trichloroethme < 148.00 UG_L dichlorodiflmromethane < 1240.00 UG__L 1,1,2,2-letrachlomethane < 44.00 UG_L ethylbeazem 1470.00 UGL- 1,1,2-trichlomethane < 44.00 UG_L hetachlorobutediwe < 440.00 UG__L rl 1,1,2-trichlorohitlumoeth < 840.00 UG_L isopropylbenzene 4990.00 UG L, l,ldichloroethaoe < 96.00 UGL mp-xyleoes 8130.00 UG_L , 1,1-dichbroetheue < 220.00 UG__L methyl tert-pentyl ether < 76.00 UG_L l,ldichlompropem < 148.00 UG_L methylem:chloride < 72.00 UG_L r 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene < 248.00 UG-L M7'BE < 52.00 UG L 1,2,3-hichlompropeoe < 40.00 UG-L naphthalene 1300.00 UG_L r 1,2,4-nichlorobeazeoe < 88.00 UG_L n-butylbeozene 3470.00 UG_L-- 1,2,4-trimethylbecumm 74200.00 UG_L n-propylbeazene 17900.00 UG_L - 1 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropro < 112.00 UG_L o-xylem 4600.00 UGL-- r 1,2-dibromoe0tme < 76.00 UG_L sec-buty8 itnume 1280.00 UG_L - 1,2-dichlorobStyrenee < 80.00 UG_L Styrene 103.00 UGL 1,2-dichloroetham < 60.00 UG-L tort-butyl alcohol < 2160.00 UG___L 1,2dichloropropane < 96.00 UG L tert-butyl ethyl ether < 132.00 UGL 1,3,5-trirmthylbenzene 36200.00 UG_L✓ tert-butylbeozene _ < 128.00 UG__L 1,3dichlomber zene < 14,00 UG_L tetrachbroed me < 88.00 UGL_ 1,3dichloropropane < 64.00 UG-L toluene 64300.00 UG L 1,4dichlorobenzene < 100.00 UG_L trans-1,2dichloroethem < 120.00 UG__L 2,2dichlomproptne < 292,00 UG an L trs-U-Clichloropropene < 164.00 UGL 2-butanane 596.00 UGL trichlorcedume < 132.00 UG__L 2-chloroethylvinyl ether < 64.00 UG___L trichlomflumometh n < 1600.00 UG_L 2-chlorotolmme < 100.00 UG_L vinyl acetate < 256.00 UG_L 2-hcoumone < 52.00 UGL vinyl chloride < 760.00 UG_L 4chlorotolum, < 72.00 UGL 4-isopropyltoluem 1040.00 UG__L'� 4-methyl-2-pentanone < 60,00 UGL acetone 3960.00 UG acrolein < 4900.00 UG___L L acrylonitrile < 84.00 UGL benzene < 80.00 UGL bromalmozem < 94.00 UGL bromochloromethane < 172.00 UG____L bromodichloromedume < 64.00 UG_L bromoform < 68.00 UG_L bromome0mne < 4400.00 UG_L carbon disulfide < 400.00 UG_L carbon tetrachloride < 136.00 UG_L chlorobenzcne < 80.00 UG_L chloroetham < 1000.00 UG_L chloroform < 94.00 UG L �. chloromethane < 1280.00 UG L cis-1,2-dichlormthene < 80.00 UG_L cis-1,3-dichloropropene < 160.00 UG L Idibromochloromethane < 60.00 UG_L inted 6/10/2004 6:25 Results bvComPletedGS.mt Pae.la ,.f 7e ORANGE COUNTY SANITAIi-A DISTRICT w � plmaa: June 23, 2004 r (714)962-2411 heu LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER t4)962d 56 a,:.a,.am.ma, HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. ea eaa e127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 Velky.CA r 927ze-et27 a am.: ao1e Ellis„ Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING r 92706 Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 27, 2004 ` Re: Permit NO: 2-1-079 1 Aa Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 749619 collected by • the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/27/2004, your company was In violation of its enies permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: �am Constituent(s) In Violation area aene Part. Lypress Oil 8 Grease Min. r l'-awBeein Verlm . Gorden G. Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may Beach result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to Ir1'na HaEre your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company la Palma be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a n e Reminds significant violator. Pr Inge Prl- You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance some Ana Sea[Batch determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. Stamen Tustin If you have an questions, lease telephone Kell Christensen at 714 593-7420. Ylle Pen Y Y Q P P Y ( ) Yorba Undo 4-1 0 aranae Kelly Christensen r,1, p,st, Source Control Supervisor costa IHase Midway arty p1ser'�a c: OCSD Inspector- DF r f anna aannn OCSD Engineer- MH rl 10 maintain world.class leadership in wastewater and cosset resource management, I Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 e. Source Control Division e. WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT a HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 06/092004 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 'y ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 749619 INSPECTOR DF e, Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE : 2 Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: d Sample Date 05/272004 Time : 0930 Location: CLARIFIER Composite Hours Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0,00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : Dbcharoe Permit Limit Over Limit Violation Violation conall!" S MQIL Iealoev M" to (pal IbslDav Pertain Over 11t1211 mom n'•: HE)2') 1�F�eA a' Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. ' REVIEWED BY a. ve e. Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,California 92728.8127 (714)962-2411 s Source Control Division SELF-MONITORING ' WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT a HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 03/23/2005 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 ,d ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 539386 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE 5-2C a+ Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: e. Sample Date 12/13/2004 Time : 1300 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours Actual Discharge ' Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base : 0.02300 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective:05/01/20D4 Dlscbnroe Penns Limn Over Dmtt Violation vlowbon eV coneltivente MU& IbamBV MOL lbpma MPJL lbsMa Pe nt Over jM 624 0.692 00 Tpipl Tcoft 040%, a OQB; 01F71..y 193 MINOR a Otgdnipe,' d Please address any questions concerning this report to Laurie von Winckelmann at 714-593-7411. REVIEWED By P+ a. i aan II I L Weck Laboratories, Inc. ,yg Wl' �711 I1111 Emlronmmud and Aw"cal services-since 1964 I J Report Date: Friday, January 7,2005 Received Dab: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 Received Tl='. 4:10 pm J Turnaround Time: Normal Client: Hawk Industrial Phone: (714)630.8111 3001 E. La Palma Ave. FAX: (714)6304141 Anaheim, CA 92806 Attn: Larry Booher Project 12-13-12-14.04 P.O.a: Certificate of Analysis Work Order No: 4121444-01 gamp6ID: Sample Bo: Matrix: Water Sampled By: Client Sampled:1=1114 13:00 Sample Note: Sample Bo: ad Reporting Amlyte Rem t Qmlltten Bator D1lotlon Limit Method Prepared Analyzed such Chloromethane............................................65 ugA 10 10 EPA624 IV15A1/ IVIW04 mt 7501139 Vinyl chloride.............................................ND ugll 10 10 EPA624 IV15,01 12/16/04 mt W501139 BrOmomethane............................................ND tell 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16/04 m1 W501139 Chlomethane................................................I'm ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 IV16/04 mt W501139 �1 TrictdOrOBuoromethane..............................NO uSA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 IVI64M m1 W501139 1,1-Dlchloroethene......................................ND ug4 10 10 EPA624 12/I3Po4 12/16/04 m1 W501139 Methylene chloride.0.0................................ND ugA 10 50 EPA624 IV15/04 12/16/04 mt W501139 ti tnmY1,2-13lchloroethen0.............................ND ug/I 10 10 EPA624 12/15M 12/16/04 mI W501139 1,1-Dlchlorombene..aI...............................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 IVIW04 mi W501139 Chloroform........Ae....................................390 ug/l 10 10 EPA624 12/I5/04 12/16/04 mt W501139 1,1,1-Trichloroetpane.4 ............................ND uaA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 IVIWU4 mt W501139 Carbon tetrachloride....................................ND ago 10 10 EPA624 IVIS104 IV16/0/ an W501139 Benzene.......e............................................NO u8/1 10 10 EPA624 12/15M IV16A4 mt W501139 1,2-Dichlorcethane._K...............................ND u84 10 10 EPA624 IVIS/04 IVI6 mt W501139 Trichlomethene....I..................................ND USA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 IVI6M m1 W501139 1,2-Dichluropropane...qW...........................ND uyl 10 10 EPA624 IVI5/04 12/16/04 mt W501139 Bromodichloromethene..dl......................26 ugn 10 10 EPA624 IV15AM IVI6104 mt W501139 y 2-Chlorcelhylvinyl ether..............................ND ug/1 10 50 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16/04 an W501139 cis-1,3-Dlchlompropene..............................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12115A04 IVIW04 an W501139 Toluene........................fI..........................._ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 IVIS/04 IV16/04 mt W301139 ti mars-1,3-Dichloropropene..........................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12115A04 iV16/04 mt W501139 1,1,2-Trichloroetkmle.l...........................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 I2115A04 IV16AM mt W501139 Temwbloroethene........ ...........................ND ug/1 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 IVIW04 mt W501139 Dibromochloromethene...............................ND ug4 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12116AM m1 W501139 an C1110robenZeOe............................................ND u8/1 10 10 EPA624 IVISAM IVI6AM mt W50II39 Ethylbenzene.......t�................................._ND ug/I 10 10 EPA624 12/I5N04 12/160t an W501139 Bromofoml..................................................ND uSA 10 10 EPA624 12JI5104 12116/04 an W501139 ~ 1,1,2,2-Temachloroethere...........................ND 08/1 10 10 EPA624 IVIS/04 12/16/04 mt W501139 m-Dicblorobenzene.....................................ND 0811 10 10 EPA624 IVIS/04 12/16/04 mt W501139 p-Dlchlorobennne..................................I...12 ug/I 10 10 EPA624 12/I904 IVI614 mt W501139 PDichiorobe0une......................................ND ug/1 10 10 EPA624 IVI5104 12/16/04 rat W501139 Lab#: 4121444 Past I of 14859 East Clark Avenue,City of Industry,California 91745-13% (626)336.2139 FAX (626)336-2634 www.v=klabs.com , L r Weck Laboratories Inc. r W II71111 , Envirmummol and Am*" -Since 1964 -� Certificate of Analysis r Work Order No: 412144401 Sample me SampleHe, Matrle: Water Sampled Dr. Client Sampedd:l2/ MB 13:00 Sample Note; Sample Boa Reported Ae,yn Remo O.Mi. Uuitr Dawdle, Unit Method Prepared Avalyand Bahb r ACIOIC111.......................................................ND ug/I 10 700 EPA 614 12/ISA/ 11/I6N0 :n W301139 ACryknlitrile................................................ND uah 10 t00 EPA 6N 12A5/O4 IVI6/00 M W501139 '+I Surrogate: 1.2-Dlchlorne(w.44 107% 66-136 EPA 624 /LI5 1V16O4 m1 W501139 Surrogate:4-Bromoflumvienreae 108% 79-119 EPA 624 11/I994 12/1604 wt W501139 Su"waa,:Toluene-d8 90.0% 86-118 EPA 624 IVISM IVJ604 wl W501139 r WorkOeds Nm 41214" Sample ID: Sample Be, 0boiM . Wafer Sampled By: Came Sampled:12n3A416..00 Sample Notre Samples" r Reporte0 Aaalyte Rnml Qe,tl64re Ualb DButm Una III PrepM Awayad Bates Chloromedume.............................................31 4114 10 10 EPA 624 IVI5O4 12JI6104 an WWI 139 r Vinyl chloride..............................................ND "A 10 10 EPA 624 IVI5O/ 1V1604 M W501139 Brontamethane............................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 12/15/04 I2JI604 an W501139 Chkrcoethsne...............................................ND u0# 10 10 EPA 624 IVI5O4 1V16O/ to W501139 r TrlchkxoBuoromethaae...............................ND MA 10 10 EPA 624 1VI5O4 IN16O0 red W501139 1,1•DlChloroethene......................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 IVI5O4 I2JI6104 e, W501139 Methylene chloride......................................ND USA 10 50 EPA624 IVISM IV16/04 ou W501139 Dens-1,2-Dichloroethene.............................ND ug/l 10 10 EPA 624 12/15A4 IV16104 rot W501139 r 1,1•DIChl0roethane......................................ND UgA 10 10 EPA624 17JISN4 12/1604 M W501139 Chkrcoform..................................................920 uSA 10 10 EPA 624 I2115N4 12/16/04 e, WS01139 1,1,1-Trichloroethme..................................ND u,A 10 10 EPA 624 12/IS/04 12/16h04 to WWH39 r Carbon tetrachloride....................................ND u911 10 10 EPA 624 IVIS104 12116004 no W501139 Betunne.......................................................ND uZA 10 10 EPA 624 12/15/04 1211604 mt W501139 1,2-Dichlofcedume.....................................ND on 10 IO EPA 624 IVISM IV16O4 e, W501139 r Trichloruethene...........................................ND awl 10 10 EPA624 IVIS/04 IV16104 on W501139 1,2-Dichloropropane....................................ND ugli 10 10 EPA 624 I2115104 I2116O4 at W501139 Bromodichlofomeilme...............................52 uZA 10 10 EPA 624 IVISAI IV1601 an W501139 ,r 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether..._.........................ND "A 10 50 EPA 624 I21I5M I2/16O4 an W501139 cid-1,3-DchkNopopene.............................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 I21I5O4 12/16/04 no W501139 TOluene........................................................ND u9/1 10 10 EPA 624 IVIW I2/16O4 an W501139 r trmD-1,3-Dichloroplopene...........................ND an 10 10 EPA 624 I2/I5O4 I2/I604 m1 W501139 1,1,2-Trichloroethane..................................ND Ran 10 10 EPA 624 I2/15O4 I2/16/04 no W501119 Tetrachloroethene........................................ND ugd 10 10 EPA 624 I2/I5O1 IV16O4 M W501139 Dibromochloromedume...............................11 uy11 10 10 EPA 624 12/15M IVI6O4 an WWI 139 ChlolobenZerle.............................................ND ugd 10 10 EPA 624 IV15O4 I211601 e, W501139 Ethylbenzene...............................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 INISM I2/16O4 nt WWI 139 Bromoform..................................................ND an 10 10 EPA 624 1V15O1 1V16D4 an WWI 139 1,1,2,2-Tetrachlorcethene............................ND 44 10 10 EPA 624 IVIS/04 12116O4 uu W501139 m-Dichloroben2ene.....................................ND u8A 10 10 EPA 624 IVI5O4 1V16O4 e, WSOI139 p-Dichlorobenzetm......................................ND wgll 10 10 EPA 624 IV15O4 IV16O4 m1 W501139 r o-Dichlorobeniene......................................ND ego 10 10 EPA 624 IV15O4 IVI6 mt WWI 139 Lab#: 4121444 Page 2 of 5 14859 East Clark Avenue,City of Industry,California 91745-1396 (626)336-2139 FAX (626)336-2634 www.wecklabs.com Weck Laboratories, Inc. Errvlmnmentdl and Ana"cal Scrrivs-Sinre 1969 Certificate of Analysis r Work Order Na: 41214M-02 Sample ID: Sample so: Matrix: Water Sampled By: Client Sampled:12113/0416:00 Semple Note: Sample 13ua Reporting Anelyte Reedt Quondam Unit; 00odon IJmit Memed Prepared Analyzed Beteb Acmlein.......................................................ND ugn 10 too EPA 624 12/15/04 IV1604 m1 W501139 Acrylunilrile................................................ND ugA 10 too EPA 624 IV15/04 1VI6/04 m1 WS01139 au Surrogate: 1.2-Dichloroetha n,44 110% 66-136 EPA 624 12115104 12/1"4 mt W501139 Surrogate:4-BromoJluorobemem 112% 79-119 EPA 624 12115104 12/1"4 mt W501139 Surrogate:Toluene-C8 94.2% 86-118 EPA 624 IV15,04 1VI"4 ml W501139 ea Work Order Nm 4121444-03 SanpleI@ Sampleaoe Matrix: Water Sampled By: Client Sampled:12/14M 07:00 Sample Now Samplell" a Reporting Andyte Result Qaalinm Udtr ROatims I,aut Method Prepared Analyzed Ratrb Chlormnethane............................................3R USA 10 10 EPA 624 1VISN4 12/16M mt W501139 Vinyl chloride..............................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 12/1VO4 12/16/04 m1 W501139 BromometMane............................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 1V15m/ 12/16/04 an W501139 Chlmerthere...............................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 12/IS/04 12/16/04 m1 W501139 Trichlomfluoromethme...............................ND ugA t0 10 EPA 624 12/IS/04 12/16/04 mt W501139 1,1-Dichloroethene......................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 IV15M 12/16/04 tot W501139 Methylene chloride......................................ND ugA 10 50 EPA 624 12/IS104 12/16104 mi W501139 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene.............................ND ogA 10 10 EPA 624 12/15Po 12/16104 ed W501139 I,I-Dlchloroethane......................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 1V15M 12/16/04 m1 W501139 Chloroform..............................4...................380 an 10 10 EPA 624 1V15/04 12/16IN ml W501139 1,1,1-Trichloroethane..................................ND u94 10 10 EPA 624 12115104 12/16/04 mt W501139 9r Carbon letrachlorlde....................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 12/15/04 12/16/04 mt W501139 Ben2ene.......................................................ND uy/I 10 10 EPA 624 12115104 IV16104 an W501139 1,2-Dichloroethme......................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 12/15/04 12/16/04 mi W501139 I.a Trichloroelhene...........................................ND tan 10 t0 EPA 624 IV15/04 12/16/04 mi W501139 1,2-Dichloropropane...................................ND USA 10 10 EPA 624 1V151D4 IVI6/04 an W501139 Bromodichlorometbane...............................23 tell 10 10 EPA 624 12J13104 12116/04 mt W501139 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether..._........................ND .&A 10 50 EPA 624 I2/15/04 12/16m4 m1 W50t139 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene..............................NO on 10 10 EPA 624 1V1904 IV16M m1 W501139 Toluene........................................................ND urll 10 10 EPA 624 12/15/04 I2/16104 ml W501139 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene...........................ND uga 10 10 EPA 624 I7JI5104 I2J16/04 m1 W501139 ~ 1,1,2-Trichloroethone..................................ND u&A 10 10 EPA 624 1V15104 I2/16/04 m1 W501139 Tetrachloroethene........................................ND USA 10 10 EPA 624 I2J15104 I2/I6104 mt W501139 Dibromochlommethane...............................ND ugn 10 10 EPA 624 I2J15104 IV1604 no W501139 � Chlorobenme.............................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 I2115/04 I2/16104 not W501139 Ethylbenzene...............................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 6N 12/15/04 IV16104 an W501139 B,,,farm..................................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 IVIV04 IVI6104 m W501139 H 1,1,2,2-Tebachloroethme............................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 12115104 I2/I6104 out W501139 m-Dlchlorobetzene.....................................ND USA 10 10 EPA 624 I2J15104 12/16104 rm W501139 p-Dichlorobenzene.......................................12 ug/1 10 10 EPA 624 12/15/1t4 12/16/04 m1 W501139 pe0-Dichlorobenzene......................................ND uga 10 10 EPA 624 12/15/04 IV16/04 m1 W501139 Abed: 4121444 Page 3 of 5 PU 14859 Fast Clark Avenue,City of Industry,California 91745-1396 (626)336-2139 FAX (626)336-2634 www.wecklabs.com J WL Weck Laboratories, Inc. Ew"nmenml and Analytical Services-SInce 1954 Certificate of Analysis Work Order No: 412144403 Somple lD: Sample Box Matrix: Water Sampled By: Client 9impkd: 12/1410407:00 Sample Nam: Sample flax l NeamAng rl Aaalyte Peralt Qu00en Uolb DOxdee Limn Method Prepared Analyzed Bamh Acrolein.......................................................NO ugA 10 too EPA624 12/15/04 12/16M m1 W501139 Acrylonitrile................................................ND ugA 10 too EPA624 12/15A14 1VI1 m1 W501139 Surrogate:42-Dlchloroelhane-d4 108% 66.136 EPA624 12/15/04 12/1&N err W501139 Surragole:4-BromaQuorobemene 110% 79-119 EPA624 121IN04 12/16W ml W501139 I Sunogale- Toluene-d8 93.2% 86-118 EPA624 12/15/00 1211&04 ml W501139 ,aJl Work Order No: 412111104 "le ID: Sample Box Matrix: Water Sampled By: Client 8ampld:12114/0400:00 Sample Nob: Sample Box Reporting Analyte Bnmt QtaOMn Units DOanoe Umn Method Prepared Analyzed Batch Chlorometbane............................................ND USA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 W16104 mt W501139 Vinyl chloride..............................................ND USA 10 10 EPA624 IV15M 1VI1 m1 W501139 Bromomethone............................................ND tell 10 10 EPA624 12/15104 12/16/04 m1 W501139 Chloroedmle................................................ND u8/1 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16/04 we W501139 Trichlorofluoromethane...............................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/I6104 mt W501139 cod ],I-D'tichloroethene......................................NO tell 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/I6104 mt W501139 Methylene chloride......................................ND ugn 10 50 EPA624 12/I5A4 12/16/04 mt W501139 trails-1,2-Dichloroethene.............................ND ug/I 10 10 EPA624 12/15m4 17JI6104 mt W501139 1,1-Dichloroethene......................................ND USA 10 10 EPA624 32115M 12/16/04 mi W501139 Chlorof0rm..................................................am ug4 10 10 EPA624 IV15M IV16/04 m1 W501139 1,1,1-Trichloroethane..................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16/04 on W501139 Carbon tetrachloride....................................ND ug0 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12116M mt W501139 Benzene.......................................................ND USA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16/04 on W501139 1,2-Dichlomethmm......................................ND uyl 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16/04 no W501139 ne Trichloroethene...........................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/15104 12/16/04 mt W501139 1,2-Dlchlorupropene....................................NO ugA 10 10 EPA624 1L15/04 IV16/04 on W501139 Bromodichloromethane...............................A7 tall 10 10 EPA624 IV15104 12/16/04 mt W501139 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether..............................ND USA 10 50 EPA624 12/15/04 12116/O4 mt W50I139 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene..............................ND ugh 10 t0 EPA624 12/15/04 I2/16/04 mt W501139 Toluene........................................................ND tell 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16/04 no W501139 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene...........................ND USA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12JI6104 mt W501139 ~ 1,1,2-Trichloroethene..................................ND USA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16/04 mt W501139 Telrachloroethene........................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16/04 m1 W501139 Dibrotnochloromethene...............................ND USA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16/04 m1 W501139 Chlorobenzene.............................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 ]VW04 12/16/04 mt W501139 Ethylbenzene...............................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16/04 no W501139 Brotoofomt..................................................ND tell 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16A04 an W501139 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane............................ND USA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12J16104 mt W501139 m-Dichlorobenzene.....................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16/04 at W501139 p-Dichlorobenune.......................................12 USA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16/04 mt W501139 .e o-Dichlorobenzene......................................NO ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/0/ IV16/04 mt W501139 LaW: 4121444 Page 4 of 5 ,y 14859 East Clerk Avenue,City of Industry,California 91745-1396 (626)336-2139 FAX (626)336-2634 W W W.Wecklabs.com JJ L111I Weck Laboratories, Inc. PPI 1511111111111 Ervim mnamal and Analltal Savi e -Slmx 1964 JI Certificate of Analysis .1 Work Ord.,No: 412144644 Sample ID: Sample are Matra: Water Sampled By: COard Sampled: 12/14104 08:00 Sample Note: Sample aoa J Reporting Aaalyte Remll QoaUfirn Unib Dilnnpa Ilmit Method Prepared AWynd Batas Acroleht.......................................................ND .'/J t0 100 EPA 624 I2115/04 12/I6004 art W501139 Acrylonitrilc................................................14D UgA 10 100 EPA 624 12/I5N4 12/16/04 no W501139 Surrogate: 42-Dichlorn/hone-d4 110% 66-136 EPA 624 12115M /211N04 mr W50/139 Sunogole:4-Bronn.luornbanorre 108% 79-119 EPA 624 1211JM4 IVI"4 art W501139 Surrogate. Tolueno-48 94.0% 86-118 EPA 624 JV15/04 /2/1d04 ar W501139 20 JAuthorized Signature s EIAC h 1 132 1ACSLAP 91014 Contact:Jayna Kostura (Project Manager) Nt43 EIAC p 0/229CA The ren/v in thv neon apyfy ro the sump/es arto/yed in arcordasme with the rhab o/custody document. Wrrk la6ararnlrs nrtiJln rMl the au nn/u men a// and rtquiremenv oJNELIC vn/ru nobd in the Case Npnarive. Thb amyumlrrporr mml6e nprodured In mrnnrery. Notas: The Chain i.Cmtody documem n pen of the poM of rtpon. y My trnitr one bmple d for teeing will be untata ofonc month from the final rtpan dart unlms ashen erangcmcnv am madc in advance. All to of one expressed on sect weight i mis unless athmvise slteeiftW. ND=Not daeerd,blow the tenoning limit. Sub=5ubroniachd avalYsn,original report enclosed. If sampk onibeted by Week laboatonee,samplW in eccordmmr to lab SOP MISM2 Mao for Date Qualifiers: 1 1 w w lab# 4121444 Page 5 of mg 14859 East Clark Avenue,City of Industry,California 91745-1396 (626)336-2139 FAX (626) 336-2634 www.wccklabs.conn ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT omee: November 21, 2005 nim 962-2411 r•" LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER _ 7141962M56 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. ,r eo a 9127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 r Uw Valley.rn 92729-9127 _"Is A.: eec ""•• Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING 'vw Valley.U W _ I 927oe-7ot9 Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: October 25, 2005 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 jw.od. Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 879129 collected by • the Orange County Sanitation District on 10/25/2005, your company was in violation of its elel„ permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: a,en•"" Constrtuent(s) In Violation e °e 6uene Port Lyprees Total Toxic Organics iey Foeman Wmn Fi G.G Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may eeem result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to your company being classed as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company e H4Me � Pelme be Gassed as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a M.m=. significant violator. Newport Beach aree2e .� I Pr•=•^�• You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance i see n determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. sre� r Sell If o have an questions, lease telephone Kell Christensen at 714 593-7420. W1. Perk Y U Y 9 P P Y ( ) YIN'08 L"d. r✓ wrrty of arenpe Kelly Christensen �Ivn ohse+ese Source Control Supervisor C e Mesa LM14,dwey Gry W mewes. c: OCSD Inspector - DF b1; aee=h OCSD Engineer- MH _ I r Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 r (714)962-2411 Source Control Division r WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT r HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 11/08/2005 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 879129 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE : 2 Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date 10/25/2005 Time : 0850 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours r Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base : 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective: r Discharoe Permit Limit Over Lim tt Violation Violation constituents MAIL Ibs/Oav malL Ibe/Dev M9& tbs/Dav Percent(yer Tie 624 3.913 0.0 dui 801 � ;tXRM di};e(� :801 NOW� Please address any questions conceming this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. REVIEWED BY r r r r I 2-1-079 I.RNS6C laudam Repo"-Comll Gran Sheen cam sheet a 979129 Pent+ 2-1-079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM LIMS0 979129 Colle=i by David Francis Re iale1,10252005 1:37:13PMm2.4-C WF<leued Da¢ nmos ft,eeble O%ank Compn..K GCM13 Method:EPA 624 Analysis Date 10=WS m,pxyknas 65.00 UG L se 1,1,1,2•tetrachlmoethme < 2.40 UOL methyl tart-pmtyl ether < 1.00 UGL 1,1,1-trieLlmoerharte < 22D UGL methylae cldonde < 10.40 UGL 1,12,24etreddaoelhme < 220 UGL MIRE < 620 UGL r 1,124rihlomedlme 3.44 UGL naphthalene < 9.40 UG L 1,42-uieWannuiflomoeNme < 11.80 UGL abutylhco-. 13.60 UG L I,Idichlaaethane < 4.60 UG L v-p-pylb- 76.40 UGL 1,1-dichlmoethme < 13.40 UGL o-xylme 32.90 UG-,L 1,1-didJompropme < 4.00 UG L sec-butylbeorme < 5.60 UG L n 1,2,3 chlombma<ne < 4.00 UG-J. styrene < 19.00 UG L 1,2}.b+tldompmpmc < 3.60 UGL sut butyl alcohol < 90.00 UG_L 1,2,4- chlmobemume < 520 UG-J. unt-butylethylether < 5.60 UC L 1,2,4-u®ethylbmune 303.00 UGL tct-butylbevrme < 4.60 UGL 1,2dibramo-3-chlompropme < 3.60 UGL tea chlamcthme 737 UG-J. 1,2dibromoahave < 220 UGL inhume 201.00 UGL ^' 1,2-dichlmob. < 4.00 UG_L ums-1,24ichlmaethme < 1120 UG-J. 1,2-&ddwonhmc < 4.00 UGL uans-1,3-dichlompmpme < 4.40 UGL 1,2diddoropropme < 220 UG-4 ulchlomethme 7.60 UG}. .. 1,3,5-uunethylberurne 122.00 UGL Mchlomfluomm<W®e < 19.60 UG L 1,3-0ichlmobename < 3.90 UOL vinyl accmte < 15.90 UG_L 1,3-didiloropmpme < 2.20 UGL vinyl chloride < 6.60 UG L 1,4-dichlaobmzeae < 4.40 UGL Analysis Date Iv042005 r 2,2d1ddana0pone < 9.20 UGL chloroform 1,590.00 UGL 2-butaaom 704.00 UGL 2-chhoethylvinyl etha < 3.00 UOL r 2-chlaorolume < 4.40 UGL 2-11umane < 420 UG-A. 4-chlaomlume < 3.40 UGC. 4-isgnopylmlueoe < 420 UO_L r 4-aw hyl-2-pcotamne < 7A0 UGL ace+®e 73I.00 UG L m aolein < 30.00 UO L .. aaylonitrile 14.70 UGL bmetne < 220 UO L bmnwbennae < 2.90 UGL brumochlosvalethene < 4.80 UGL r bmmadichlaanethane 633 1103 L brorrefmm 5.04 UG-L hmmanethme < 11.00 UG-L r carbon disulfide < 420 UGL carbm+evachloridc < 6.60 UG_L chlombeiueoe < 3.60 UG L rhlaoeth. < SA UG_L chlorwnethme < 10.60 UO L cis 1,2diehlomethene < 2.40 UG L cis•1,3diddumpmpme < 3.40 UG L dibmmocWommethme 4.77 UGL dibtomomethane < 320 UGL diddomdifluommethane < X00 UG L ethylbannam 11.80 UG L hexachlambtaadime < 6.80 UG_L isopropylbenmte 1330 UG_L !hinted 11/82W5 6:15 Rmdp_byCompleedGS.rpt pap m of 65 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT _ I Plane. August 1, 2006 1714)962-2411 14a° i.ARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER ,r [714)952 356 ,...,..ve,.n, HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM �la�aaa�: 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. 20 6ea 9127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 umain Vtlhr.CA 927E&13127 Howe eMaea: Oa41Ens Ave+e - Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICT'S MONITORING uMtn Valley.M 92706-7018 Nan-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 10, 2006 _ I Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 ft�. Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 922609 collected by _ I • the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/10/2006, your company was in Violation of its em1.. permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: "naEm,n Constituent(s) In Violation Brea Total Toxic Organics m Wy CQ rwnraln ✓errey FiO�" Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may con>aa c gmn eea:n result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company Le WEa La aaE„a be classified as SNC, your companys name will be published in the newspaper as a Loa 4remrma significant violator. r Ne1eport flange Macentia You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance _ ( "a�„ determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. s�nr� vma " If you have any questions, please telephone Kelly Christensen at 17141.593-7420. 0 r 0 � long er orange ,-v�S, Kelly Christensen `m.ry o;eerlers Source Control Supervisor Co. 04 AfRway Gq It— ol.xrleea c: OCSD Inspector - DF p 1 par,cn OCSD Engineer - MH _ I r 1 Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 r (714)962-2411 Source Control Division r WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT r HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 07/31/2006 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 r ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 922609 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE 2 r Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: r Sample Date 05/10/2006 Time : 1120 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : r a Rermltumlt Ovar Llmlt Violation Violation Conatauenm mall. Inema1 MCVL IM/oa, -Q/L lbWDmi Pcrcm,t ove. Te 624_SC 3.575 0.0 r TOW Todc 1.636 ...0.58 1.06 organics r Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714.593-7420. REVIEWED BY m � S — a � f ( t r, 2-1-079 UMSSChter4ce Report-Comptaed Green Sh" a G.Shert0 922609 Permlt 2-1.079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM LIMS 4 922609 Collected by David Francis Received in Ieb 5/102006 1:24:12PM a 0.2°C Isb 0elaat<d Daa 5/24/06 Pvni ble O,µak Cemponndt, GC/61.5 Method:EPA 624 a Analysis Data 05/l220U6 dichlorodlHuommcdmne < 36.00 UO L 1,1,1,2-unrachlomethane < 2.40 UG_L ethyl aceate < 10.00 UOL 1,1,1-triddaoahare < 220 UGL ethylbemate 2430 UO L 1,1,2,2-tetarhlormhnne < 270 UO L hexachlorobuadirnc < 6.W UO L ro a, 1,1,2-tricldoelhc < 2.40 UO L isopropyl a«ate < 20A0 UO_. I,Iktrichloroa0uaroethanc < 11.80 UO L isopropyl ether < 20.00 UGL l,ldcddoroedme < 4.60 UG_. isopropylbevene 26.70 UO L 1,1-dichlomc0ane < 13.40 UGL m,p- yIaas 92.70 UGL 1,1-0icldompmprnc < 4.00 UG_L methyl forrmte < 20A0 UOL 1,2,3-tricddombemene < 4.00 UGL methyl tart-pcntyl ether < 1.00 UGL 1,2,9-tricNoropropme < 3.60 UGL methylene chloride < 10.40 UOL 1,2,4-McWombwene < 5.20 UGL MTRE < 620 U0L 1,2,4-trunethylbeamne, 922.00 UGL .-amyl aceate < 20.00 UGL 1,2-dibromo-3-chlomprorymc < 3.60 UG_L rmphOmlece 20.10 UQL d• 1,2dbromaethme < 2.20 UG_L nbatyl accrete < 20A UGL 1,2-dichlombwrne < 4.00 UG_L n-butylbaruene 26A0 UGL 1,24rblorecWme < 4.00 UG_L n-heptane 5130 UQL 'j la4chloroprapme < 2.20 UG_L n-hexane < 20.00 UOL 1,3,5-tdchlomb--. < 2.00 UO L n-pentane < 40.00 UGL 1,3Struncthylbenaane 296.00 UO L oI.Pylbeozae 161.00 UOL 1,3dehlombmnae < 3.90 UGL o-aylme 6820 UO_L L,3dichlompropane < 2.20 UO L secbutylbwene 9.66 UOL 1,4dichlombenane < 4.40 UU L styene < 19.00 UGL lchloro-2-0umobvnmte < 2.00 UQL art-butyl alcohol < BOAO UGL ,r 2,2dicldnmpmpanc < 920 UGL tart-butyl ethyl ether < 3.60 UGL 2-butanone 73SO UQL art-butylbeoune < 4.60 UO L 2-chloreethylvinylether < 3.00 UOL munchlorodhene 2.43 UQL 2-ehlomalume < 4.40 UGL mb hydmfmm < 20.00 UQL 2-hmmnooc < 420 UO L toluene 1,100.00 UGL 4chlmoaluene < 3.40 UGL aram-1,2dchl.mothme < 1120 UGL 4-isopropyholurne 8.98 UGL troaa-1,3dicldo opmpene < 4.40 UQL 4-methyl-2-pmtmone < 7.40 UO_L "ichlmocOma 74.90 WL aaaM 162.00 UQL hichloro0uommetane < 19.60 UGL oaoldn < 30.00 UOL vinylacetme < 13.80 UO L acrylmdtrile < 13AO UOL vinyl chloride < 6,60 UG_L bemnne < 220 UOL bmmobemene < 2.80 UO L bromochlommcthme < 4.80 UO_L bromodichlammedane 3.53 UO_L bromoform < 2.80 UG_L m broom m clhc < 11.00 UO_L carbon disulfide < 420 UG L ~ carbon tetarhloride < 6.60 UG L chlomberacnc < 3.60 UG_L rhloroethme < 830 UG_L chloroform 140.00 UO_L chlotomelhme < 10.60 UG L m.1,2-dichlomelhene < 2.40 UO_L 6 13dichloropmpene < 5.40 UO_L cydoheamc < 10.00 UO_L dibromochloromethme, 3.04 UG L dibmmconeLhan, < 320 UO L r _ I I a ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT pa"! August 1, 2006 (714)962-2411 n14i 962m- LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER www.eeW.mm HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. Po en.a12) ANAHEIM, CA 92806 nc in valley.CA 92)26-a127 aua.c axxraea: s 944 blis Menu. Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING °L92 Va-7 GA Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 23, 2006 92]OB-]O18 P� 9 Y Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 'r I ngead. Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 926064 collected by ..a.. r the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/23/2006,your company was in violation of its cia.. permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: Anah.,m Constituent(s) In Violation Pare euena Perk Total Toxic Organics �YPaaa. Founrsm Valley I srrd FkA%>ran Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may Wlangm Peach result in additional enforcement action against your company, Including, but not limited to II Irian° your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company La alma P La Palma be classed as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a L.X.—Ins significant violator. r N.wpart Prxh Orange Placend. You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance s�i ern determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. P.en.wr r on If you have any questions, please telephone Kelly Christensen at (714)593-7420. Va. Park Yomaa Linda .J 6ntY of Orange ��:• ♦YrS�—� Kelly Christensen eery Oiscrlcta Source Control Supervisor r Coati Mesa Mmway cry rd area Ol..rac.. c: OCSD Inspector - DF Irene Ranch OCSD Engineer - MH r i Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 e.+ (714)962-2411 Source Control Division WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 07/31/2006 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO : 2-1.079 pa ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 926064 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLETYPE : 2 Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date 05/23/2006 Time : 0700 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours ee Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base : 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective: Dlacborae Pennit Llmlt Over Llma Vlolatlon Vlolaaon Cona6tuenb MVJL IbalDev p /g_ Ilg/Dav mg/6 IbsNav Percent Over The 624_SC 57209 0.0 it TOAC 11.377 0.58 _ 1o.W 1801.6'i X ; jA" Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. REVIEWED BY V - 1 m w 2-1-079 m 1.00S5C Imerrare Deport.Completed Greco Sheets Green Shoet0 926064 Permit 2-"79 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM r LIMS O 926064 Collared by David Francis R.1,cd in Leb 5/232006 1:29:32PM et 1.3-c Lab Released Dam 6rM PmBnbk OrBank Compooaft GC/M9 Mcleod:EPA 624 ad Analysi+DM 05242006 ethyl aremm < 100.00 UG L 1,1,1,2-tetrerblamethme < 24.00 UGL ethylbmune 735.00 UG L I,1,1-trichloroelhene < 22.00 UGL hexechlerobuta ime < 68.00 UG_L 1,1,2,2-tetracldmoethme < 22.00 UGL isoyropyleocmte < 200.00 UG L r 1,11.-Uicbloroethmm < 24.00 UGL isopropyl elect < 200.00 UO L I,1ytrichloretri0vomethone < INA UGL isoproDYlbmaene 1,IB0.00 UCL I,Idiehloroed., < 46.00 UGL m,p•xyl. 2,910.00 UGL Lidicklomethene, < 134.00 UGL methyl ftnrmte, < 200.00 UGL 1,Idichloropropene < 40.00 UG L methyl uri-pentyl ether < 10.00 UG L L2,3-trichlombenaene < 40.00 UG:L methylene chloride < 104.00 UG L 1,2,34trlchloroprvpme < 36.00 WILL MIRE < 62AO UGL r 1,2,4-trichloroMvme < 52.00 UG L n-amyl cocoon < 200.00 MILL 1,2dibromo-3-eWoropropane < 36.00 UGL naphilealme, 761.00 UG L 1,2dtbromueMane < 22.00 UGL nbutyl acetate < 200.00 UGL m, 1,2dichlomb. < 40.00 UGL nbutylbmrzne 1,370.00 UGL 1,2dichlorocthm e < 40.00 UQ L n-0eptme 2,060.00 UG L 1,2dichl.pmpme < 22.00 MILL n-hex, < 200.00 UG L 1,3,5-trichlorobenzene < 20.00 U0L n-pmtme < 400.00 UG L r 1,3,5-trimethylbemane 10,200.00 UGL n-pmpylbeoecne 5,420.00 UGL 1,3-0ichlombewam < XW UGL o-xylene 1,590.00 UGL 1,3-dichloropropene < 22.00 UGL secbutyl6memm 393.00 UG L 1,4dicWpmbemme < 44M UGL Styrene < 190.00 UG L 1-chloro-2-nuombermene < 20A0 UGL tart-butyl omhol < 800.00 UG L 2,2dichloropmpane < 92A0 UG L tart-butyl ethyl ether < 56.00 UG_L 2-buteeme < 300.00 UGL ten-butyRrmrzne < µ,pp UG L N 2chloreethylvinyl ether < 30AD UGL tetrachloroethene 47.60 UG:L 2-cid.oteluene < 44,00 UGL mtrahydnefurm < 200.OD UG L 24exmooe < 42.00 UGL toluene 9,290.00 UGL 4chlorotoluem < 34AD UG_L trms-1,2diddomeohme < 112.00 UG L 4-isopropykoluene 393.00 UGL urc,& 3dicldompropme < 44.00 UG_L 4-methyl-2-pmtm occ < 7440 UGL birNoroeoene 1.20.00 UGL acetone 2,170.00 UG 1 hicblom0uommethme < 196.00 UG_L molein < 300.00 UGL vinyl acetone < 15L00 UO L acrylonirilc < 136.00 UO L vinyl chloride < 66.00 UG_L become < 22.00 UG L Analysis Date 05252006 r bromobeoeme < 28.00 UGL 12,4-trueethylberuane 17,100.00 UG-L bromocldoromethma < 48.00 UGL bromedicldorometlo= < 12.00 UG_L bromeform < 29.00 UGL (✓ bromomethene c 110.00 UG__L cmbondimlfide < 42.00 UG_L mrbon ewchloride < 66.00 UO_L N chlomb..nc < 36.00 UG L chleroedtene < 98.00 UG_L chloroform 64.40 UG_L chWromeOmne < 106.00 UG_L P" cis1,2-didderoethme < 24.00 UG_L cis4L3dichlompropene < 54.00 UG_L cyclohexme 285.00 UG_L Ir dibromoehlonnnahme < 20.00 UG L dibrmnomethene < 32.00 UG_L diehlorodi0umom dwe < 360.00 UG_L ~ Prmed 61M006 6,13 Rmob_byCompltrtlGS.tpt Page 12 of 39 ' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r rl .n.".: June 20, 2006 (714)992-2411 r••' LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER r ]14)9520 55 rw..m4.am. HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. r P0. Ba B12] ANAHEIM, CA 92806 92]28-812] ..ne..dh.n: "' a"°^"•""• Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING Nnwn v cn 92]OB�]8-7 O19 Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 23, 2006 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 r N.mo..p9.neiw Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 926065 collected by r • the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/23/2006, your company was in violation of its chi.. permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: Constituent(s) In Violation ere. r I BueL.�Ppeu Oil 8 Grease Min. F4unw,n yr n s., �"tee Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may `.,,yr.n B..ch result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company Le H.N. L.v..n. be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a L.a.m,m. significant violator. r ryewp.rt Be.cn P(°=°^d• You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance ( gin determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. �'I swnwn r°P" If you have an questions, lease telephone Kell Christensen at 714 593-7420. uu. v..L Y Y Q P P Y ( ) Ymd. bnd. Kelly Christensen _�•,�, m..rme. Source Control Supervisor C. w Mes. Md.,Gry •^•m• [B.M... c: OCSD Inspector- OF OCSO Engineer - MH r t i r, Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 r (714)962-2411 Source Control Division r WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT r HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 06/06/2006 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 r ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 926065 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE : 2 r Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date 05123/100G Time : 0700 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours 1` Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective ; r Olsaharae Pennh Llmlt Over Llmlt vlolauen Violation OonatlWenb 11Qf- Ib mQ/L I a ma LbAnou Percent Over T e OG_1666_SGT 621.700 0.0 02'B Grease lib: 621.700 200.00 421.70-. ._.`.YIOA.•+ -:_X-'z- r Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593.7420. REVIEWED BY r �v fj r r r r r r rl ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r r� r� aMns: August 1, 2006 (7141 SM-2411 rl 714)952U.han LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER 56 rnw.ma,ewn HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM m.nlro.aai�..: 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. Ba ea,e1z7 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 °J .Main Valley.CA 92728-B127 .treat atlareve: a44 ilia Avenue Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING nuin Valley.CA 82708-7018 Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 24, 2006 Re: Permit No: 2.1-079 r� aa.ndn esancia Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 926454 collected by I • the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/24/2006, your company was in violation of its r MIee permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: Aram. Constituent(s) In Violation Brea Buena Pen: Total Toxic Organics r Lyarosa Fa.Mein Lalley Fwbrr°n Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may Gannon Grove �nw'man eaatlh result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to '■ hrWne your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company to Habra Lee Peon. be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a Laa Abb-- significant violator. r Nawaarr Beach Grange Plarenva You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance r na seai a ern determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. r� srammn 7.6h If you have any questions, please telephone Kelly Christensen at (714)593-7420. VJia Perk I y .LMtla �Mtv m or,aa. Kelly Christensen y District. Source Coatrol Supervisor Omw Mesa "da, httlway Gry rlat.r ol.tri.t. c: OCSO inspector - DF f 1r,n,na Panan OCSO Engineer- MH �Y rl r I Orange County Sanitation District r 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728.8127 r (714)962.2411 Source Control Division r WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT r HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 07/31/2006 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 r ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 926454 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE : 2 r Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date 05/24/2006 Time : 0700 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours T Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base : 0.000D0 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : plecbarae Pennit Wm ti Over Lima Vlalatlon Vlolatlon Conetlteents T & IbWav M/L. IbsfDaV M9& IbsM, �reent OvetTvW 624_SC 15.20E 0.0 r Total Tolen 42Ba':-.. 0.68:_ 3,69 a36A X Organ" - - r Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. REVIEWED BY r y/ r r r r r 2-1-079 '� I3MSSC larer4a Repo"-C"mpktN Gran Sites. Gets seas" 926454 Pemh 2-"79 HAWK INDUSTR1nL UNIFORM r LIMS M 926454 Collated by David Francis Rc¢ived.I.ab 5R42006 1:29:41PM u I.B°C Iwb 8elaxd D 6/2/1116 Porgabk Ordaak Compaade. GC/MS Method:EPA 624 Analysis Date OS M006 diddomdi0uoromethene < 360.00 UO L r 1.1.1,24CU. loroethane < 24.00 UG 1 ethyl,aetate < 100.00 UO L 1,1.1-miWOorodbane < 22.00ULO_ ethylbeorrne 228.00 UG L 1,1,2.21,merWmrcttu ne < 2700 UO L hamchl ocbmalil,, < 68.00 UO L l,l�-trichlora0�e < 24.00 UGL isopropyl acetate < 200.00 UGL r 1,1.2-trirhiaobi0uormhmre < 118.00 UGL isopopyl ether < 200.00 UG_L 1,Idichloroethane < 46.00 UGL Mpylbeomme 211.00 UG L Lldiddometheve < 134.00 U L i crop-"Imes 953.00 UG_L m 1.1-dichlompropene < 40.00 UG}. methyl fmmete < 200.00 WILL 1.23-michlmob. < 40.00 UG1. methyl tat-pentyl ether < 10.00 UOL 1,2,3-trichloropropan, < 36.00 UGL methylene chloride < 104.00 UGL L2,44bichlorobemme < 52.00 U(QL MTBE < 62.00 UG_L �O 1,2,dmime hylbwme 5,550.00 UQ L nromyl acaare < 200.00 UG L U41rromo-3<Lloropropane < 36.00 U13 L nephtbaleve 216.00 UO L 1.2dibmmonhmm < 22.00 UGL n-0utyl acetate < 200.00 UO L r 1.2dirhlorobeatene < 40.00 UGL n-butylbename 295.00 UG L 1,2dicblmoethae < 40.00 UO L r- lane < 100.00 UG-L 1,2dirhlompropmrc < 22.00 UGL n-hexmm < 200.00 UG_L 1,3.5-trichloroben , < 3000 UGL o-peclme < 400.00 UG_L ~ 0.54trimahylbeozme 2,100.00 Uq.L e-p.opylb. < 90.00 UG L 1,3diehlorob. < 38.00 I1C L o-nyhrC 444.00 UG L 1,3-0ichlompropane < 22-00 UGL s bmylbmame 72M UG L �. 1,44cldoroberumm < 44.00 UGL aYncre < 190.00 UO L 1,Wora m 2-Ouobeoonene, < 20.00 UO L tert-bmyl elmhnl < 800.00 UG L 2,2dichloropropmie < 9200 UG L k"-butyl ethyl ether < 56.00 UGL 2-bntm.att < 300.00 UGD. tan-butylbenrzne < 46.00 UG L r 2-:hlorcethylvmyl ether < 30.00 UGL tetrachloroethene, < 22.00 UG_L 2<ldorotoloene < µ.00 UGL tetrahydrofinea < 200.00 UO L 24hesmroac < 42.00 UGL toluene 3,260.00 UG_L 4-chlorotol. < 34.00 UGL trmsl2dichloroethene < 112.00 UG L 4-isopropylmluene, 94-50 UGL trmss-1}dichloropropene < µ.pp UG L &&ethyl-2-pemmone < 74.00 UG L trichbtoethene 780.00 UO_L aereac 1,090A0 U(3L Irichlom0uommethmre < 196.00 UGL aaolein < 300.00 UGL vinyl actnae, < 158.00 UG L aarylonibile < 136A0 UGL vinyl chloride < ISM UG L become < 22A0 U13 L r bmmobenrme < AN UG L bromochlommelhmle < 4L00 UG_L bromodichlaromethme < 12.00 UG L bromot0"n < 290 UG:L ~ bronnomethmrz < 110.00 UG L carbondisulfide 10440 UG_L carbon teUdcLlonde < 66.00 UG_L r cblaobmxenc < 36.00 UO_L chloraahanc < 88.00 UO_L ch10neform < 28.00 UG L ,m chloromethm e, < 106A0 UG-L cis.1,2dichlomahrnc < 24A0 UO_L cis-1.3-dichlompropae < $4.00 UG L rydohesane < 100.00 UGL ac r dibmmhlaromcthme < 20.00 UG_L 4ibmmomelhma < 32.00 UG-L r Prmw 641R oil MWb_byCompletrdGS.r c Page 15 of 39 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r per•.: June 19, 2006 (7 14)962-2411 rv: LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER r f714)8621 56 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM ,•.nina.aat.u, 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. r Po Bate127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 ,. r..,n v.ney.r 92729.8127 •c+et.A,..U. r 1 nv n a Avanuo Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICT'S MONITORING fYO 92Va-7 cn Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 24, 2006 9z7oeaale P� 9 Y Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 r Asi Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 926453 collected by • the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/24/2006, your company was in violation of its r MI.. permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: 4nab.,m Constituent(s) In Violation Brea Buena Park Off&Grease Min. a PKPraae Founwn Yb//ey F an.n Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may Bergen Gray. ,r mbagtan ab.an result In additional enforcement action against your company, Including, but not limited to /r.n your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company La Habra L.vas::. be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a Las M..'= significant violator. r ft porn Beech Grarg. Macomb You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance .Sa e.AAm determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. r S ton """' If you have any questions, please telephone Kelly Christensen at (714)593-7420. Wi. Perk Yuroa L,naa •ti .e or.•9• Kelly Christensen r Lary Districts Source Control Supervisor costa Mean "d.y caV r A.. MUM." c: OCSD Inspector- DF NW/NI R/IM./1 OCSD Engineer- MH r r � � I Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 Source Control Division WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT ^ HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 06/06/2006 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2.1-079 a ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 926453 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE : 2 Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date 05/24/2006 Time : 0700 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours °y Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base : 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : a+ Clachan, P.It Llmlt er Lim] Violation Vlolotlon consutuenrn MG& Ibs/Dey MrL 16NDey -%rL lba/Dav Pe twar TT e OG_1664_SGT 467.100 0.0 ^ 05&Grsiuia#91.- 487:100. 2g0.Oq 287.10:: 143.6 x ^ Please address any questions conceming this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. REVIEWED BY ^ rl I rl ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT rf August 1, 2006 (7141952-2411 Jr••: LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER ,r 7141952M56 w...„e..w. HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. ,r Ro.em 9127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 a 92 Valey.cn 92729-8127 .aeea.aar„e: r elie Avenue Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICT'S MONITORING nrbin Valley.G 9270e-701e Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 25, 2006 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 926457 collected by • the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/2512006, your company was in violation of Its MI. permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: Ammi^' Constituent(s) In violation seas e„ha Perk Total Toxic Organics Cypress Fountain Valley Fwlarcoa Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may GxMn wo e aaoR9tan Beech result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to w^• your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant(SNC). Should your company La Noe e La Palma be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a Lea Alamitos significant violator. Newywt Beech oran9a Pjacem- You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance I B.`8wh determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. •J ste^m^ 8en If you have any questions, please telephone Kelly Christensen at(714)593-7420. Ville Perk rorna una. �_ v„ea .r U„.9. Kelly Christensen V„ry alaeNeea Source Control Supervisor C"M Mesa M'cw y Gty ... ta.trm„ u: OCSD inspector - OF Irene Ranch OCSD Engineer- MH I `9 ti ti r ! Orange County Sanitation District +� 10544 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 Source Control Division a WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 07/31/2006 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 v� ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 926457 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE 2 Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: ptl Sample Date 05/25/2006 Time : 0700 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours P+ Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base : 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : Dlschmoe Pormn Llmlt Over Limit Violation Violation Constituents MR& lbrmaas MOIL IbsMav -011. IbIM Percent over T s U4_SC 15.104 0.0 or Ta18IToxlc 2:919' ose 2-33'- organso Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. REVIEWED BY re o ^ t re r P T I. 2-1-079 LIMSSC Imer4te Report-Campletrd G.Sbrets Green Sbeet0 926457 PeomR 2-1-079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM LIMBO 926457 Collected by David Frmcis Rnxived ut lab 52520D6 8:38:07AM et 12°C Lab Released Dme 62106 PerRnhle Orpnt Comyooads, GOO Method:EPA 624 Analysis Date 05252006 &chbrodifluommethme < 360Ap UGL ea < MAD UGL ethyl enact e < 100.00 UG_L I,I,1-trieLOmnOuum < 22.00 UGL sthylbavme 138.00 UG_L 1.12.2-tetrschlamcthme < 22M UGL hexarhlerobomdiem < 69.00 U43 L 1,1,2-trirldomethane < 24AD UGL isopropyl acetate < 200.00 UGL 1,1,2-triddomtrifluoroethens < IIBAO UG L impopyl ether < 200.00 UG L LI-diddoroe0aa < 46.00 UL G isopmpylbearene 178.00 DILL I,IEicblomethme < 134.00 UGL m.P-rylenes 501.00 UG-L a 1,I4cWoropmpme < 40.00 UGL methyl fame < 200.00 UGL 12,3-trichlombenzme < 40.00 UG_L methyl tut-Pmhl¢then < 10.00 UGL 12,3-trichimapmpeue < 36.00 UGL meWylene.Woride < 104.00 LA L 1,2.4-trirhlorobe®te < 52.00 UGL M3BE < 61OD UG L f 12,4-trimethylbenzme 4,490.00 UGL a-amyl acetate < 200.00 UGL 1,2-0ibmmo-3-cblaro a pmpa < 36.01) UGL naphthalene, 118.00 UG L 12dibromoelhane < 22.00 UO L .-butyl¢stare < 200.00 UG L pi 1,2-0iehlomb. < 40.00 UGL n-butylbevzme 212.00 UG L 1,2-dichlotoalhene < 40.00 UGL a4replme 389.OD UG L 1,2-0ichlmopnr2®e < 22.00 UG L n-h^^^• < 200.00 UG L 13.5-trichic obmrcae < 20.00 UG L n-pentane < 400.00 fHi L 1.3 i4rimeWYlbentsne 1,690.00 UG L n- mpy plbeozme < 90.00 UG L ,.3d 1iehlmobwm L e < 38.00 UG oayleoe 291AD UG L 13-dichi mpmpme < 22.00 UGL sec-burylbeovrne 7150 UG L >y 1.4dichlombmrae < 44.00 UG_;, styrene < 190.00 UGL 1<thlom-2-Oumobm�e < 20.00 UGL cot-butyl alcohol < 800.00 UG L 22dichhuopropme < 9200 UGL tut-butyl ethyl ether < 56.00 UI3 L 2-butmonc < 300.00 UGL tart-burylbeaaoe < 46.00 UGL 'O 2chlmathylsinyl ether < 30.00 UGL tetrachlomethme < 22.00 UG__L 2eWom a tolue < 44.00 UGL tetrshydmfimm < 200.00 UG_L 2-heamone < 42.00 UG L mloea 2,430.00 UG_L pe 4<Norotduea < 34.OD UG- G toms-1,2dichlorocil me < 112.00 UG_L 4-isopmpylmlom L e 64.00 UG tarns-L3didloropropme < 44.00 UG_L 4-methyl-2-pennon¢ < 74.00 UGL uichlm a oethe 345.00 UG_L ascmne 4,120.00 UGL trirNmo0aromethaa < 196.00 UG_L P^ aaolein < 300.00 UGL vinyl axmte < 158.00 UG L acrylonibile < 136.00 UG 1 sinyl chloride < 66.00 UG_L benrene < 22.00 UGL p- bmmobenzene < 29.00 UG_L bromoUlororvethme < 48.00 UG-I, bmmodiehlomm d. < 12.00 UG_L br0nmform < 28.00 UG L bromomedune < 110.00 UG_L carbon disulfide 76.40 UG_L carbon wu hlodde < 66.00 UG L P chlorobervme < 36.00 UG_L chloroethane < 88A0 UG L chloroform < 21.00 UG L P. rhioromethea < 10&00 UG-L cis-1,2-0ichloroethem < 24.00 UG L cis-1.3dichloropcopea < 54.00 UGL cyclohesane < 100.00 UG_L r dibomnochlommedwe < 20.00 UG L dibromosuthane < 3200 UG:L Ia- P tzd 602006 6,15 �yy,G ,11 pop 17 or 39 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT August 1, 2006 (71 41 962-2 411 tin: LARRY BOOMER, PROD. MANAGER J714)962n356 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. Po. 8.8127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 T%nma vanes cA 92728-8127 alw A. . Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING " 09.y 18 Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: Jul 10, 2006 92 =allay 1a P 9 Y Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 r ry ad e' Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 936008 collected by • the Orange County Sanitation District on 07/10/2006, your company was in violation of its _ enl.. permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: Anan.;m Constituent(s) In Violation eras Buena Part Total Toxic Organics,Total Toxic Organtes raanre,n vanes Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may ca an c ra mnyaan 6eacn result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to 1r na your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company t. H.Iua be classified as SNC, our company's name will be published in the news is P.I. YP paper as a Las Al.m,ra. significant violator. ,,,ewPart eeaan o,anea Praaanna You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance seal e� determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. r 1Basch r mn If you have any questions, please telephone Kelly Christensen at (714)593-7420. Vella Pert r Y4raa L,Me in el Oran,. Kelly Christensen Source Control Supervisor ry OLSNcu Lasw Mesa Maws,0" . ai.eHa.. c: OCSD Inspector- OF .,ne Pa" n OCSD Engineer - MH _ r Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 Source Control Division _ WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 07/31/2006 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2.1.079 r ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 936008 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE : 2 Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date 07/10/2006 Time : D610 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : ® DlsMarae Permit Lima Ow Lim tt Violation Violation Constltuenta V)L lb&/Da Mail- lbs/Da mg/1- IbafDa percent Ovm Tv" 624_SC 4.M 0.0 TotalTawo Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. _ REVIEWED BY r I 2-1-079 LIMS-SC Imc bco Report-Comple Gam Shall r G.&M 936008 Penh 2-1-079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM LI14S0 936008 Collawd by David Rams R ,vice.UI,7/10/2006 1:29:33PMat0.2-C Lab Retraced Dm 7/I11A06 Pmgesble Oegevw Compounds, GCJMS Method:EPA 624 r Analysis Dew 07/13/2006 dibmtnomethmw < 64.00 UG-L 1,41,2-tearochl0mmhmw < 48.00 UGL dichloadiflumomethmm < 720.00 UG_L 1,1,1-uicldacethmw < 44.OD UGL ethylecetatc < 200.DO UGL 1,1224.uwWannethane < 44.00 UGL mhylbenmw 65.00 UG_L r 1,1,2-richlomcthene < 48.00 UG L heeechlombumdiene < 136.00 UG L 1,12-michl=trifluomeNene < 236.00 IKi L mpmpyl aceleh, < 400.00 UG L 1,1-0ichlome0mne < 9200 UGL isopmpyl etha < 400.00 UG L .� 1,ldichlaoethene < 26&00 UGL iscpmpylbwene < 16D.00 UO L I,IdichlompmPene < 80.00 UO_L m,p•xykms 214.00 UGL 1.2,3-trichlm9beraene < 80.00 UGL methyl fommw < 40D.00 UO_L 12 -trichlo.propm < 72.00 UGL methyl ten-Mtyl ether < 20.00 IIU L r 1,44-hichlombenzene < 104.00 UO L methyl=rbbride < 208.00 UG:L 1,2,4-vunethylbenseoe 1,620.00 UO_L MTHE < 124.00 UG L 12-dibmmo-3-d&mpmpmw < 72.00 UGL n-emyl mtmc < 400.00 LR L r 1,2-dlbmmoethane < 44.00 UO L nephtheleae < 188.00 UO_L 1,2-diehlmobetvnw < 90.00 UO L n-butyl accrete < 400.011 UO L 12-dichloro.th. < MOD UGL n-baylbenmw 118.00 UO L 12-dichlompmpane < 44.00 UGL n-heptmm < 200.00 IR3_L r 1,3,5-bichlombatsaw < 40.00 UG_X, .4nnut e < 400.00 UO L 1,3,5-bimethylMvene 702.00 UOL n-pentane < 800.00 UO L 1,3dichlombeuveae < 76.00 UG L n.pmpylbeneene 483.00 UG 1 r 1,3-0ichlompmpene < 44.00 LAGE L o-ayleoe < 180.00 UG L 1,44c1hlombeneene < 99.00 UG L sec-butylbenune < 112.00 UGL 1<Mmo-2-fluombemme < 40.00 UO L styneee < 380.00 I1GL 2,2dichlompmpane < 194.00 UGL tert-butyl alcohol < 1,600.00 UG L 2-bumnotw < 600.00 UO L ten-butyl ethyl ether < 112.00 UGL 2- Motcethylvinyl ether < 60.00 UGL ten-bwylbevene < 92.00 UG L 2-chlomwl-a < HAD UU tenaddomethene < 44.00 UG L r 2-hexenone < 94.00 UGL mtmhydmfiam < 400.00 UO_L 4-chloromluene < MOD UGL MI." 808.00 UO L 4-isopmpyholuene < 94.00 UGL bew-1,2-0ichlomethene < 224.00 UG L 4-methyl-2-pentenone < IQOD UQ_j. tr i,3-dichlompmpene < 88.00 UG_L amu ne < I M.00 UGL biehlamethene 219.00 UG_L aaoleln < 600.00 UG_L tichlomfluoromethmm < 392.00 UO_L aaylonihile < "2.00 UO L vinyl actlaze < 316.00 U13LL bavene < 44.00 UGL vinyl chloride < 132.00 UO_L bmmobetoene < 56.00 UO_L bmmochlommethmw < 96M UO1. r btmnodiddommethmw < 24.00 UG L bmmofotm < 56,Oo UG_L bromomcMene < 220.00 UG_L Gabon disulfide 156.00 UG_L + carbon wuachloside < 132.00 UG L chlombemene < 72A0 UG_L chlotoelhmc < 176.00 UG_L r chloml'onn < 56.00 UG L ehlommethane < 212.00 UG_L cis•1.2diNlomeOlene < 48.00 UO_L ,is-1,3dichlompmpem < 10&OO UGL ,:vclohe<ane < . 200.00 UG__L dihn m chlommMunc < 40.00 LG L r Pnnrcd 7119/2" 6:15 14w1a_byC'omplgmGS.mt Po8e9 of 16 EXHIBIT E m Hawk Industrial Uniform Enforcement Correspondence s KHMk Adminb M Complaint 097106FINAII I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATIO,v DISTRICT _ I _ I January 25, 2000 IPlmrnr Larry Booher, Production Manager (7141 SM-2411 Hawk Industrial Uniform _ 1 1120 N. Armando St. Anaheim, CA 92806 Pe Bop a127 rW M'VsVey.G 9272913127 SUBJECT: Compliance Meeting ,r .ueec emeear Re: Permit No.2.1-079 1OB44 ells Avenue rwM'n Vevey.G ' 92709-701e � As a result of your major noncompliance with the permitted discharge limits for oil and grease (08G), and total toxic organics(TTO)occurring in September. October, and November 1999, Hawk Industrial Uniform(Hawk)is directed to attend a compliance meeting at the Orange County Sanitation District's(District)offices located at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley on February 15,2000,at 10:00 am. • ' The following is a summary of the violations: CMOs _ 4renerm Date Sample Type Constituent Concenbation m a'°° 09/09/1999 Grab 08G 254 e1e1e s 09/09/190 Grab TTO 1.50 rowlmirverey 10/06/1999 Grab TTO 2.82 Fu ° 11/30/1999 Grab O&G 348 cwesn Gro eeeen _ 1ri^° At this meeting, please be prepared to present the reasons for these noncompliance LO Psi eB problems and an adequate proposal for the co ective actions and improvements that Hawk Los aem will take to achieve long-term compliance with its permit limits. You will also be required to Narp°r se�� submit a time schedule for the implementation of the corective actions. After reviewing the PIPCP„P'e proposal,the District may require Hawk to complete the necessary Improvements under the se"rs are terms and conditions of a Probation Order and/or an Enforcement Compliance Schedule seer Beech Agreement. y Stemm� r me WHO Perk If you have any questions,please telephone Jane Tran at(714) 593-7441. r ae it"ee ��nry of Orange 'Irery OIscNPts C ,y Jane Tran W.. Project Specialist MlN.y c ry _ 1�"r 01ee"kes AR:JT:hk H1wp.6ra1l513590VIaden091746.doc rvne Ranh r Certified Mail Z 765 126 730 c:Arnold Chavez _I �I T..tr..rc..r r6e Oupl.�Ynn/F inn rpm Fr..Amnmmr rl,minh Fr�allan�a in Wa nnmror A.crame ORANGE COUNTY SANITATILJ DISTRICT February 17, 2000 Phase: 171419622411 Larry Booher, Production Manager nrellias address: Hawk Industrial Uniform Po. Bu 0127 1120 N. Armando St. F rwn valley,M Anaheim, CA 92806 92728,6127 street a A Avenue Compliance Meeting i'et OB44 e 01i. SUBJECT: Com Outcome 9 Pounmin valley.CA Re: Permit No. 2-1-079 92708.701e The Orange County Sanitation District(District)held a compliance meeting with Hawk Industrial Uniform (Hawk)on February 16, 2000, to discuss the necessary corrective measures to bring Hawk's effluent discharge into long-term compliance with oil and grease, total toxic organics, and temperature discharge limits. cities At this meeting Hawk indicated that the source of pollutants comes from the materials Anaheim Bare being laundered from a new account, which has been found to contain unacceptable Buena Perk levels of contaminants. To resolve the noncompliance problems, Hawk is Foutdec,War, discontinuing servicing the account and has given the customer 60-days notice. The FullaHon servicing of the account will and April 1, 2000. The District will conduct follow-up Borden BPach sampling during the month of April 2000 to verify the effectiveness of the corrective ndngeon seem P� 9 9 P lY Habra measure Implemented. If future sampling results continue to show discharge lA Habra L.Pa me violations, the District may require Hawk to install wastewater pretreatment Las aemme equipment or implement other adequate waste management practices. Newport Beech % ..no. It is hoped that implementation of the above-mentioned corrective measure will bring Sanne Aae Hawk's effluent discharge into compliance so that no escalated enforcement action is Seel Beach smntcn necessary. ruedn frill. Perk r rw Lind. If you have any questions, please contact Jane Tran at (714)593-7441. �..t. of Groove Ito" Districts �u�> �✓L/ Coate Mesa Jane Tran Midway Dry 1 Project Specialist _teter Districts trnna Ranch JT:AR:hk H Awp.dW%W35B0%aderkHA W K.doc c: AC 'To Pmmct me Pudic Health and the Environment Grouch Ec.nanc.in weatawater systems' m ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ke January 21,2004 2q1+, Larry Booher, Production Manager r. ��Y.'-e Hawk Industrial Uniform se 1120 N.Armando Street Anaheim,CA 92806 a 27 SUBJECT: Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges C4. Re: Permit No.2-1-079 9127 "C This letter serves to bring Hawk Industrial Uniform (Hawk)'s attention to its continued 7oie noncompliant discharges to the Orange County Sanitation District's (District)sewer facilities. This letter also serves to direct Hawk to take immediate corrective measures to ensure +. compliance with the total toxic organics(TTO)discharge requirements set forth in Permit No. y 2-1-079. In February 2000, Hawk attended a compliance meeting with the District to discuss Hawk's clg4.: previous TTO noncompliance and to we Hawk an opportunity to resent reasons for the P P r PP dY P n°gym noncompliance and a proposal for corrective actions. At the meeting, Hawk indicated that the source of the TTO was the materials received from a new account and that Hawk had given the customer a 60-day notice for service termination. �Yaresa .wuey •Fyiiert'vn Since that compliance meeting, Hawk has had 3 other major TTO violations as follows: GVYH B°ech )fvina Sample Type; Ca cenfra(7 etlre s ,DB �(1p9, u • q�ms District Composite-2C 04/12100 1.59 1.01 Major m•°�^ District Grab-2 05/06/03 12.27 11.69 Major (Av"Be (errand° District Grab-2 12/23I03 15.74 15.18 Major q,E 9eecn THEREFORE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 615 OF THE DISTRICTS WASTEWATER sun ,q n DISCHARGE REGULATIONS(ORDINANCE NO.OCSD-01), HAWK IS HEREBY tytg..Pork ORDERED TO CEASE NONCOMPLIANT DISCHARGES TO THE DISTRICT'S 1.rw° SEWERAGE FACILITIES. d. .. neae You are reminded that pursuant to Section 615 of the District's Ordinance, administrative m fines may be assessed up to$5,000.00 per violation or up to$10.00 per gallon for each discharge violation. In addition, pursuant to the authority of California Government Code, r M.. Sections 54739-54740, any person who violates any provision of the District's Ordinance will y co be liable up to$25,000.00 per violation for each day that such violation occurs. ?. X.111.fR ^ Based on the above violations,the District is increasing Hawk's TTO self-monitoring from semi-annual to quarterly, effective this quarter(January- March 2004), to provide Hawk an opportunity to demonstrate long-term compliance with the TTO discharge limit. The District will be revising Hawk's permit to include this new quarterly TTO self- monitoring requirement. The District will also be providing additional self-monitoring report 4J forms for this new requirement. 1 it ^ Larry Booher, Hawk Industrial Uniform Page 2 r January 21, 2004 W Furthermore, Hawk is required to attend a compliance meeting at the District, located at 10844 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley,on February 11,2004, at 2:00 pm. The purpose of .y this meeting is to review the TTO violations and to discuss the corrective measures that Hawk will take to avoid further noncompliance. If yo have any questions, please contact Mile Kteinbergs (714)593-7408. W W A rlana Renescu Engineering Supervisor ^ AR:MSK:on Gftx , mue\e40weNEmpsl bCaeM1b1-0]e Mewk IMURIN UMNmrAoe Certified Mail 7002 05I0 0003,1",(. '1714 c: Kelly Christensen Dave Francis ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ �r 'M ^ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT March 23, 2004 Larry Booher, Production Manager Hawk Industrial Uniform ea 1120 N. Armando Street ` Anaheim. CA 92806 }F„ 127 SUBJECT: Compliance Meeting Summary and Requirements c4 Re: Permit No.2-1-079 �127 tinee ' ca On February 11, 2004, the Orange Count'Sanitation District(District)held a compliance '1a meeting with Hawk Industrial Uniform (Hawk)to discuss Hawk's total toxic organics(TTO) violations. The following summarizes the discussion that took place in the meeting: x.. 1. Source of TTO. Hawk was unable to identify the source of the TTO violation other „�-• than to indicate that it services shop towel accounts, nor was Hawk able to clarify or , •• confirm its ability to profile the accounts to ascertain the possibility of TTOs being Introduced in the wastewater because of these accounts. The former and current - :Aen.vr District inspectors had mentioned seeing stacks of dirty shop towels onsite in the ae. recent past. Perk u ,yaney The District has evaluated Hawk's previous TTO compliance history and has found ;,` reo�mc that in 1999, the faciliy.has had previous incidents of TTO violations. At that time, eee.n Hawk identified a new account for shop towels as being the source of the TTOs. At ,;NNr. the compliance meeting held in February 2000 between Hawk and the District, Hawk (,7 Hmra committed to discontinue the account by April 2000 and stop servicing accounts with A Petro. dirty shop towels. pfemit.s death dyers. As a result of the above findings and the discussion during the recent compliance py—Pe meeting,the District directs Hawk to take all necessary steps, including but not limited ' Are to effective profiling of towel loads and putting in lace procedures to prevent and ' mwn P 9 P 9 P P 31,: sarmr minimize the introduction of toxic organics in the wastestream. Hawk is required to ry Vqe Perk submit submit a report on the connective actions it has implemented by April 12,2004. g� 2 Quarterly TTO Self-Monitoring. The District will require Hawk to increase the of pr.na• frequency of TTO self-monitoring from semi-annual to quarterly upon renewal of -- Hawk's discharge permit in May 20D4. This requirement shall be effective upon ol.eH.e. issuance of the renewed permit. ((wmlduw cly 3. Bleach as Potential Source of TTOs. At the meeting, Hawk presented the possibility of bleach as a potential source of chloroform,which is one of the ••. ot••�••• compounds making up the TTO list for this permit. However, upon review of the analytical test results for the samples that showed TTO violations, chloroform was hvin.R.ron found either under the detection limit or at relatively lower levels than the other petroleum-based volatile organic compounds found in the samples. Therefore, the District does not believe that the bleach used onsite is the source of the TTO violations. 9 7 r r 40 r Larry Sooher, Hawk Industrial Uniform Page 2 March 23,2004 r 4. Clarifier Cleaning. Hawk indicated that the clarifier is being cleaned on Wednesdays and Thursdays. The District understands that the cleanup consists of emptying the r clarifier contents into a vacuum truck for off me disposal. The District requires Hawk to maintain copies of the disposal manifests onsite and to be prepared to submit them upon request by the District. Disposal of the clarifier contents from the cleanup into r the sewer is prohibited by the District. 5. TTO Sampling. Hawk Is requesting to be informed when the District collects TTO samples so that Hawk could collect Its own sample at the same time for the purpose r of comparing test results. As part of its procedures, the District informs the facility contact or representative of its presence and intent to sample. Please be advised that it is Hawk's responsibility to ensure that it is available to take its own sample at r the time the District is conducting the sampling. The District will not either delay or postpone performing the sampling to accommodate Hawk's own sampling. Also, in accordance with the provisions of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance),the District has the right to conduct unannounced inspections and �- sampling without prior notification. In addition, please be advised that any TTO sample taken by Hawk, in parallel with the District's, is in no manner considered as being a duplicate sample, even if taken r at the same time and from the same point,and therefore will not be admissible as a duplicate or'split'sample(which implies the actual splitting of a single sample). In other words, Hawk's sample and sample results will be considered in addition to the r District sample and as an indicator of wastewater discharges, but not in place of,for determining Hawk's overall compliance at the time of sample collection. Please note that the sample results will not be accepted unless sampling and analysis is performed in accordance with Hawk's permit conditions. Also, Hawk is required to r submit the sample as a voluntary self-monitoring event using the appropriate District form, which is assigned with a unique tracking number. r In conclusion, Hawk is required to take all necessary measures to ensure long-term compliance with the District's TTO discharge limit. Please be advised that if the violations continue, the District may escalate enforcement actions that may include permit suspension or the issuance of a Probation Order, Enforcement Schedule Compliance Agreement and/or r Administrative Complaint. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at(714) 593-7408. r r ml�ei�gE. M Engineer, Source Control Division r4AR:MSK:on H.be09�`sdON9u�e�p12000VeMrslFMinEerycU93390.0ac c: Kelly Christensen r Dave Francis r zoo and 0EX41 022:01 tit-EE-to prtAI923a Towel 8� lJniform Service/Sales 1120 North Armando Street-Anaheim, CA 92806-714-234-2814- FAX-630-414i e April 23,2004 cc: a Mile Malnberps e County Sanitation Districts of orange County P.O. Box 8127 He Original Fountain valley, CA 8272E-8127 g Deaf Mlle: Please be Informed that during the period of time that Hawk Incurred problems with it's 170's an investigative attempt was made to Isolate the cause of the problem. e. During tins rime several ewdomers believed to be possible sources of the problem were terminated and subsequently our test indiaate that we believe to have cured the problem. a Sincerely, a- a, Lary Booher Plant Manager v C n 0 w ;n =np Z. m r. Icl P � L N T P rl ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT July 27,2004 near sa2� Rusty Hawkins,Vice President Hawk industrial Uniform 17141 asamsa 1120 N.Armando Street Anaheim, CA 92806 � P.D. m.8127 SUBJECT: Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges F aims W.rn Re: Permit No.2-1-079 a27269127 10844 are.area'° The Orange County Sanitation District(District)recently sampled Hawk Industrial Uniform's rau.n v *.e4 92703-7D19 industrial wastewater discharge to determine whether Hawk has resolved the violations previously detected in the company's discharge. On May 27,2004, Hawk's effluent again exceeded the District limits for TTO,and also for Oil & Grease. The following table � r•� summarizes Hawk's ongoing violations of discharge limits: •Ch1is Constituent Sample Type Sample concentration concentration V Data (mgl) Over(mg/1) Type Ananerm a ea swans cart TTO District Composite—2C 04/12N0 1.59 1.01 Mal or c " TTO District Grab-2 05ID6/03 12.27 11.69 Ma'or F4unran 4W/w FWermn TTO District Grab-2 12/23/03 15.74 15.16 Major Geraen more TTO District Grab-2 0527/04 65.77 65.19 Ma'or ihnonamn araM Amne 088 Grease DlstrietGrab-2 05/27/04 318 118 Major La Noe e e Parms t�Nemrcas PURSUANT TO SECTION 615 OF THE DISTRICT'S WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS(ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-01), HAWK IS HEREBY ORDERED TO CEASE Pleca NONCOMPLIANT DISCHARGES TO THE DISTRICTS SEWERAGE FACILITIES. serve a,a During the previous compliance meetings held at the District in February 2000 and in Tu n February 2004, the District was assured that Hawk could resolve its difficulties with meeting wne ve,+ permit limits through better management of its accounts. It now appears that Hawk's efforts rorea Ln08 have been ineffective, and that installation of pretreatment equipment is necessary. nt. sf or4npe Hawk is required to attend a compliance meeting at the District,located at 10844 Ellis ��ry rn.crl.c. Avenue in Fountain Valley, on August 3,2004. at 2:00 pm. The purpose of this meeting is to review Hawk's TTO violations and to discuss the corrective measures that Hawk will take sue n+ese to avoid further noncompliance. M,a y Cry �wMr a1R.ri s Hawk is reminded that pursuant to Section 615 of the District's Ordinance, administrative fines may be assessed up to$5,000.00 per violation or up to$10.00 per gallon for each ravra Raacn discharge violation. In addition, pursuant to the authority of California Government Code, Sections 54739-54740, any person who violates any provision of the District's Ordinance will be liable up to $25,000.00 per violation for each day that such violation occurs. �1 _l i _I rf Rusty Hawkins, Hawk Industrial Uniform r� Page 2 July 27,2004 It you have any questions, please contact Martin Holl at(714)593-7432. r� Adrian Renescu, P.E. Engineering Supervisor �AR:MH:on Hbe0Xb19CONguyenor200aVeXareVdr39]SBl.tlac Certified Mail 7002 0510 0002 6066 1170 c: Kelly Christensen Dave Francis r� rl _ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT _ r September 21, 2004 I P: : 1714)9S2-2411 Rusty Hawkins, Vice President r..: Hawk Industrial Uniform _ (714)9a2D 56 1120 N.Armando Street ""ANLO�•m"' Anaheim, CA 92806 [ale.p aAraa: Po. e..B1z7 SUBJECT: Compliance Meeting Summary and Requirements v.u.y,CA Re: Permit No.2-1-079 92726-8127 ::Haas.Area: 0844 olie Avenue On August 23.2004,the Orange County Sanitation District(District)held a compliance 92 Valley.G4 un 708-701e meeting with Hawk Industrial Uniform (Hawk)to discuss Hawk's total toxic organics(TTO) and oil and grease violations. The following summarizes the discussion that took place in the snme.r meeting: nr.wa � 1. Constituents. The constituents found in the 7T0 violations are aromatic compounds r ( including benzene, ethylbenzene,toluene and xylene("BETX"),which are typically CPU.. found in petroleum products. It appears that laundering shop towels which have been Anenelm used to wipe up gasoline,oil, or other petroleum products are the source of the TTO's area in the effluent. 8 .ne Perk F ummn Wley 2. Source of TTO. After each of two previous compliance meetings held in February PWler= 2000 and in February 2004, Hawk proposed to eliminate the source of the TTO r w11 violations by terminating the accounts responsible for their introduction. The nbag[.n en sampling result of May 27,2004 (65.77 mg/1) indicates that controlling TTO 1 i.Nacre concentrations by this method has not achieved long-term compliance. to Palma ios semen. 3. Profiling shop towels during collection. Hawk suggested that drivers may be able Newyor[Beech _ Droop. to selectively reject loads which contain shop towels soiled with petroleum products. P/eten>a This is a Best Management Practice(BMP)for reducing TTO loading,and may be _ p S �M. implemented as part of an overall TTO management strategy. However, this practice 11 SOW Sw= alone may be insufficient to ensure compliance. Tu coca Park 4. Long-term compliance. Hawk is directed to select and pursue one of the following ltroa u,na options to attain long-term compliance: � .rrca .r Dr.nae a. Discontinue laundering shop towels,thus eliminating the source of �k.' District. noncompliance. If Hawk elects this option,the District would expect to find no r soiled shop towels being laundered at any time. C.s[a Mesa 1 Mltl -y Cm b. Continue to accept shop towels and install a pretreatment system to treat the r pear Aorta. constituents generated by the laundering of these towels. 1rH . as^[h At the meeting, Hawk agreed that company management would be able to evaluate r I options and select a course of action by October 1,2004. A written action plan to return the facility to compliance, including proposed dates for implementation, is required by this date. No pretreatment equipment is to be installed without prior I review by the District. � I _ I Rusty Hawkins, Hawk Industrial Uniform Page 2 September 21, 2004 �I Hawk is also reminded to take all necessary steps to control the discharge of TTO's to the sewer system to prevent violations from occurring. Further noncompliance with discharge limits and/or failure to meet the requirements of this letter, may result in escalated enforcement action, including the issuance of an Administrative _I Complaint. Hawk is again reminded that pursuant to Section 615 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations(Ordinance),administrative fines may be assessed up to$5.000.00 per violation or up to$10.00 per gallon for each discharge violation. In addition, pursuant to the authority of California Government Code, Sections 54739-54740, any person who violates any provision of the District's Ordinance will be liable up to$25,000.00 per violation for each day that such violation occurs. If ypu hav/e��an�Iy questions,please contact Martin Holt at(714)593-7432. rV Addana Renesw, P.E. Engineering Supervisor, Source Control Division I AR:MH:on � M:WepNb\B90\npuyeno12000Ve11anVwIR99]BBB.Coc c: Kelly Christensen Dave Francis �r ETS �r �I _I r� oe� _I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATILm DISTRICT _ _ October 18, 20D4 ,a•ne: 01 41 962-2411 Rusty Hawkins, Vice President f.; Hawk Industrial Uniform �714)962Q 56 1120 N. Armando Street •namence i.e.m Anaheim, CA 92808 p1np idtlra°" SUBJECT: Late Notice—Compliance Meeting Summary and Requirements Po. eon et 27 9 �' q Vnpain cA Re: Permit No.2-1-079 92728-82e-912] •rest•Q sz]ce.7 rvote'rees: alie Avenue Hawk Industrial Uniform is reminded that the item checked below was due for submittal on "1 nLBin VO October 1,2004, in response to the letter dated September 21, 2004 and issued to Hawk a Industrial Uniform by the Orange County Sanitation District. This date was proposed by Mr. Lary Sooner and Mr. Ralph Hawkins during the compliance meeting held on August 23, 2004. • tale• ( ) Industrial Waste Survey Anaheim Bare ( ) Effluent Meter Calibration Report Buena Perk 0�ee ( ) Production Data Fountain valley 1 ay,y;�l�°`.re. (✓) Proposed Plan of Action �nangton Beech _ kvina ( ) Other: La He&. Le Palma Lra"N ata r V.wp "Beach it is your responsibility to comply with the requirements of this letter. Failure to do so is in claw. violation of your permit and will result in escalated enforcement action. Please call the Racenoe Santa aria undersigned at(714) 693-7432 If the item checked has already been submitted. seal Beech Stanwn Par* ✓Ila Perk via Linde Martin Holl nsy m orange Associate Engineer III 1 Source Control Division _Mnry OISM¢s r s AR:MH Get rvlese el Bey .. H'tdeptaslaaoV oii cl ss mnf cementwaw Indusltlal Unilorlwa"Indusmal Unilo m FX 201M dot ee later ol.tras. Via Facsimile fI Irane Rancn _1{p _ I rl n.,..m..w.ne.a...re.w...e:..,. ......,.r.r.en..,...........,.....,..,.e...er VHAWK INDUSTRIAL 1 TOWEL & UNIFORM SERVICE J 1120 N. ARMANDO STREET•ANAHEIM, CA 92806•(714)630-8111 • FAX (714) 630-4141 WednMWOc1Gber27,20D4 Adnana Rencsry ' County Sanitation Districts of Orange County log"Ellis Ave. P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,Ca. 92728-9127 JDear Adruma: In Reference to meeting long term compliance,Hawk intends to investigate and seek out iechknowledge that is practical and efficient in preneating waste effluent- There as well,are very significant issues with the selection and installation of such a system.They are: r 1. Installation of ANY equipment will require a completely new electrical service to include permitting,plan check and Anaheim's schedule to complete such work. •' 2. Complete review of the plan already submitted for Ideal Uniform within the districts for it's effectiveness. 3. Submittal of the application to the Municipal water districts,a request for incentive funding. As each of these issues that are bullet pointed maintain there own schedule outside of ray control I cannot specifically give you dates as to each of there completions. I can however,tell you that plans for an elecuical engineer to survey our facWty and to create load calculations is underway. As well,we are cu ently doing waste evaluations with Nomhem the company selected by Ideal Uniform in order to submit plans on a system. We at this time are evaluating size to effectively submit plans. Lastly,we expect to have the application to the Municipal water districts within the next ten days for review and funding allocations. Sincerely. Rush Hawkins President ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT _ I _ I May 27,2005-2411 nlm9sz Rusty Hawkins,Vice President rpp; Hawk Industrial Uniform 17141962-03ea 1120 N.Armando Street '� pnawae.e.mm Anaheim, CA 92806 meurp wma..: SUBJECT: TTO Sampling and Compliance Status Review Po.boa 6127 p 9 F ,r awm venay.CA Re: Permit No.2-1-079 92726-a127 MnMi pNmY: 11e44 Ellis Avenue During the period April 15-22,2005,the Orange County Sanitation District(District)conducted ,. en 92 vmley.CA dailycomposite sampling for TTO at the Hawk Industrial Uniform Hawk facility 9,,,v." CA P p 9 (Hawk) aY in Anaheim. All samples collected were found to be In compliance with District limits. MamMr However, a review of Hawk Industrial Uniform's discharge data shows occasional but consistently recurring TTO and oil and grease violations. The constituents found In the TTO violations are aromatic compounds including benzene,ethylbenzene, toluene and xylene Culp. ("BETX"). These compounds are typically found in petroleum products and indicate that shop r towels,which have been used to wipe up gasoline, oil,or other petroleum products, may be Amepe the source of the TTOs In Hawk's effluent. Hawk's discharge violations since 1999 are Buena Peru summarized In the table below: C)praee Four veiny Funnrr°n Semple Concentration Coneentretlon Violation GeNen Gmm Constituent Sample Type untln9mn Beech Date (mgl0 Over(mgn) Type Le Nebre one TTO District Grab 01/26/99 88.32 87.74 Major Le Pe/me Oil&Grease District Composite 11/30/09 348 148 Major Los Alemiroe Arewporr Beech TTO District Composite 04/12100 1,59 1.01 Major a pnpa P a TTO District Grab 05I0& 3 12.27 11.89 Major Same,,w A. Bear eeaen TTO District Grab 12I23/03 15.74 15.16 Major _ Swr , TTO District Grab 05127/04 65.77 65.19 Major ruean We Perk Oil&Grease Dlstil Grab 05/27/04 318 118 Major Yarbe Lin r 6.ty err erenap TTO Hawk Composite 12/13/04 0.69 0.11 Minor Jim" oistActs As a result of the violations, Hawk aaended three compliance meetings held at the District on '� ware nnaaa February 16,2000, February 11 2004.and August 23,2004. Two"Order to Cease Md.,Grr Noncompliant Discharge"were issued on January 21, 2004 and July 27, 2004. Hawk's r..pr oiaprmse response has been limited to terminating accounts thought to be the source of the TTOs and _ instructing its drivers to reject unacceptable loads. As the violations recurred in spite of these tr.,na ae„cn measures,in a letter dated September 24, 2004,the District required Hawk to install a pretreatment system and submit a schedule for the installation to the District. In a letter dated October 27, 2004, Hawk failed to commit to a date for completion of pretreatment system �. installation. As of this date,no further correspondence has been received and no pretreatment system has been installed. i _I Rusty Hawkins, Hawk Industrial Uniform —I Page 2 May 27, 2005 I Please be advised that the District will continue to monitor Hawk's discharge and, if another violation occurs, the District will take enforcement action which will include the imposition of pretreatment system requirements through an Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSA). Pursuant to Section 615 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance), continued violation of the permit limits may result in the assessment of administrative civil penalties of up to$5,000 for each day In which the violation occurs or up to $10 per gallon for each discharge violation. In addition, pursuant to the authority of the California Government Code, Sections 54739-54740,any person who violates any provision of the District's Ordinance or any permit effluent limit shall be liable civilly for up to$25,000 per violation for each day that such violation occurs. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at(714) 593-7410. Mahin Talebi Source Control Manager MT:AR:MH:on H:Wepr,IeNC0lnpu�emW0TbMMdNN1J0.Eoc c: Kelly Christensen Dave Francis P P P P P adidpue;s 96jeyasip ssedAq ay; pue `6uidid `dwnd ssedAq aq; ;o so;oyd wjo;lun lep;snpul WeH d IISIHX3 P P P r f..� K Hawk industrial Uniform bypass collection ,0. BYPASS LINE(FROM BYPASS COLLECTION SUMP) — INSIDE WALL PENETRATION r y,+ 00 a Hawk Industrial Un'Iform indoor bypass plumbing from collection sump, 3/16/2006 Hawk Industrial Uniform bypass discharge pipe(indicated by arrow),at exterior wall penetration, 3/I6/2006 r � t r r y _ r r .� Hawk Industrial Unifonn bypass line(indicated by arrow),3/16/2006 i n Hawk Industrial Uniform bypass discharge pipe and standpipe, 00 1 ,. ♦ L i s L� DYE FROM BYPASS PIPE.AT MANHOLE .• STREET � . • Hawk Industrial Uniform, shovAng dye injected at bypass standpipe, 1 1 A < eP �. ry F A• M Y: .r � J 5 � y 11. EXHIBIT G Hawk Industrial Uniform _ Order to Cease Violation of Industrial Wastewater Permit Conditions, March 23, 2006 MHmk Adnnstr a Cwep'vt 091206FINALM I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATIGIv DISTRICT _I _I March 23, 2006 171419622411 Rusty Hawkins, President r.-. Hawk Industrial Uniform r'1714i 9152m56 1120 N. Armando Street Anaheim, CA 92806 :vrsry wmee: 1 Pn em:e1z7 SUBJECT: Order to Cease Violation of Industrial wastewater Discharge Permit Conditions �p1n0ain' "" G° Re: Permit No. 2-1-079 9272B8127 meet Wren: AAA n .11 . ue CA During a routine permit renewal inspection on March 16, 2005, the District staff found that r . nh.Ave en B P P 92706 7019 wastewater from several washing machines discharge to a trench which terminates in a _I sump. In the sump, a pump controlled by a float switch transferred the wastewater to a pipe rA. r which penetrated the north wall of the facility and discharged to a standpipe outside the wall. Aceeeie. Dye tests performed by the District staff indicate that the standpipe discharges directly to a • downstream manhole, bypassing the designated representative sample point at the end of _I clue the underground clarifier. Bypass of industrial wastewater constitutes a violation of Section 501.4(A)of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations(Ordinance No. OCSD-01) Arwnem which states, "Bypass of industrial wastewater to the sewerage system is prohibited." arse e"erra Perk Furthermore, bypassing the designated sample point results in altering and misrepresenting Fon.�w wile, the results of both the District's and Hawk's monitoring samples that are used to determine FYN&r[ compliance with the discharge limits. Part IILE of Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit states, �Baru, "Knowingly making any false statement on any report or other document required by this k rre permit or knowingly rendering any monitoring device or method inaccurate, is a crime and may result in the imposition of criminal sanctions and/or civil penalties." Le P.I. jL.s Al.mrtes Newpe^t e.edr THEREFORE, HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM IS HEREBY ORDERED TO CEASE �.+ orange FURTHER VIOLATION OF ITS PERMIT CONDITIONS AND THE DISTRICT'S P1ec.ntie ORDINANCE. .n s Ana _I Seel Beath srentan Hawk Industrial Uniform is directed to attend a meeting at the District's offices located at ivsen 10844 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley, on April 3, 2006 at 10 a.m., to address these 1fi0e Pert issues. o m brie. .1te" at n..... Please be advised that pursuant to Section 604.A of the District's Ordinance, the District may suspend or revoke any permit when it has determined that a pennittee has: a)falsified, _1,tem oi.taets tampered with, or knowingly rendered inaccurate any monitoring device or sample collection method:or b)violated any condition or limit of its discharge permit or any provision of the cOSCd m.,a District's Ordinance. Also,pursuant to Section 615.D.7 of the District's Ordinance, m,dwar c"� administrative fines may be assessed up to$5,000.00 par violation or up to$10.00 per gallon ter 01etricts for each day of discharge in violation of any waste discharge limit, permit condition, or J. lMn. Pa^[n requirement issued by the District. In addition, pursuant to the authority of California Government Code, Sections 54739-54740, any person who violates any provision of the District's Ordinance shall be liable civilly up to a maximum of$25,000.00 for each day in which such violation occurs. _I To maintain ,wrldclass;exdersNo m wastewater artl water res.mxe rnawe°men[. Rusty Hawkins, Hawk Industrial Uniform March 23, 2006 Page 2 If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned or Martin Holl at (714) 593-7410 and (714)593-77432,�re�speectiivvely. Mahin Talebi Source Control Manager AR:MH:on H:wocnwa "u"no=WVe Nanm W32.d« Certified Mail 7003 3110 0002 3654 6140 c: Dave Francis ETS I hereby certify that this document, January 24, 2007 Decision of the Steering Committee of the Orange County.Sanitation District Board of Directors Regarding Appeal of Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins is a true and correct copy of the official District record. Clerk of the oard Orange County Sanitaion District G9wp.dlaWmin\BS\F0RMS\Copy Cerbfimte.doc ` 16 '"�tno✓ed i ay o a- ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS STEERING COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 24, 200 DECISION OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE REGARDING APPEAL OF HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM AND RUSTY HAWKINS Issues Presented 1. Is the General Manager's determination that Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins, its owner and President (hereinafter "Hawk") avoided representative sampling and altered the monitoring data by bypassing the designated sample point described in Permit No. 2-1-079 supported by a preponderance of the evidence? 2. Is the General Manager's determination that Hawk was guilty of eight (8) violations of its wastewater discharge limits for total toxic organics C 7170s") and Oil and Grease(O&G)supported by a preponderance of the evidence? 3. Is the General Manager's determination that Hawk failed to pay appropriate user charges which together with penalty and finance charges amounted to $71,891.72 on the day of the award supported by a preponderance of the evidence? Findine of Facts A review of the underlying record confirms that on September 12, 2006, the District gave Hawk, notice of the Administrative Complaint and hearing notice re Industrial Wastewater Discharge permit No. 2-1-079. On October 24, 2006, a hearing was held at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. Neither Rusty Hawkins nor any representative of Hawk Industrial 51037.1 Uniform appeared at the hearing, nor did they submit any written evidence to the Hearing Officer. On October 31, 2006, the designated Hearing Officer, Paul Martyn, presented a Recommended Decision to James Ruth, Interim General Manager of the District. In the Recommended Decision, the Hearing Officer found evidence that Hawk was responsible for the installation of an illegal bypass line prior to March 16, 2006. Hawk's active role in the construction of this bypass line was supported by the declaration of Larry Booher, the former production manager at Hawk Industrial Uniform. The purpose of the bypass line was determined to be the diversion of wastewater to avoid representative sampling. The Hearing Officer also found that there were eight (8) documented instances of violations of the wastewater effluent limits for TTOs and O&G. Finally, the Hearing Officer found that user charges, together with penalty and finance charges, amounted to $71,891.92 at the time of the hearing, owed by Hawk. The Hearing Officer recommended monetary penalties in the amount of$45,000.00 (for the 8 effluent violations and the operation of the bypass line) and that $71,891,72 in unpaid user chargers be assessed against Hawk Industrial Uniform and its President, Rusty Hawkins. In addition, the Hearing Officer recommended that Hawk be subject to a thirty(30) day suspension of the Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-1-079 and their ability to discharge wastewater to the District's sewerage system. The Hearing Officer further recommended that before Hawk be allowed to resume discharging wastewater to the sewerage system that they pay in full $116,891.72 and install, to the satisfaction of the District's General Manager, the necessary pretreatment equipment to reasonably assure compliance with all applicable effluent limits. Page 2 of 9 5]69]JJ On November 2, 2006, the District's General Manager sent via certified mail to Rusty Hawkins, President and Hawk Industrial Uniform, an Administrative Complaint Hearing Decision and Order re Hawk Industrial Uniform, Permit No. 2-I-079. The Hearing Decision and Order stated, in part, as follows: This letter shall serve as notice to Rusty's Dust & Towel, Inc., dba Hawk Industrial Uniform, of the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) decision and order to uphold the enclosed recommended decision of the Administrative Hearing officer, Paul Martyn, in the administrative proceeding held on October 24, 2006. The Hearing Officer has determined that grounds exist for the assessment of an administrative penalty in the amount of Forty-Five Thousand Dollars ($45,000.00) for eight discharge violations and altering the monitoring data by bypassing the designated sample point; Seventy-One Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-One and 72/100 Dollars ($71,891.72) for user charges, annual invoices,penalties and finance charges due; and permit suspension for a minimum of thirty (30) days, and until the amounts specified above are received, and the necessary pretreatment equipment to reasonably assure compliance with all applicable effluent limits is installed and operational. Therefore, I have determined that Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins, and each of them, be assessed an administrative penalty in the amount of $45,000.00 and are required to pay user charges, annual invoices, penalties and finance charges due in the amount of$71,891.72. Additionally, Hawk Industrial Uniform's Industrial wastewater Discharge Permit Number 2-1-079 is suspended for a period of not less than thirty (30) days. The permit suspension shall continue thereafter until such time as the total amount of One Hundred Sixteen Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-One and 72/100 Dollars ($116,891.72) is paid in full. The permit suspension shall also continue until the necessary pretreatment equipment to assure compliance with all applicable effluent limits is installed and operational. Please be advised that Permit No. 2-1-079 is suspended effective November 18, 2006, and the$116,891.72 must be remitted to the District, and the pretreatment system installed and operational, by December 18, 2006, unless a timely appeal is filed. If no timely appeal is filed, Hawk Industrial Uniform must cease and desist all wastewater discharges to the District's sewerage system on November 18, 2006. (November 2, 2006 Administrative Complaint Hearing Decision and Order) On November 17, 2006, Hawk filed an appeal to the District's Steering Committee. Page 3 of 9 510371 On December 21, 2006, the District provided notice to Rusty Hawkins, President and Hawk Industrial Uniform of the fact that the appeal hearing would be conducted on January 24, 2007 at 5:00 p.m. at the District's offices located at 10844 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley, California. A. Regulations and Facts Applicable to Hawk Industrial Uniform 1. Hawk Industrial Uniform is an industrial laundry that rents and washes soiled uniforms, floor mats, dust mops, gloves and shop towels. Hawk Industrial Uniform also dyes and bleaches new shop towels and other materials. After washing, the items are dried, ironed as necessary, sorted, and returned to the respective clients. 2. Hawk Industrial Uniform's wastewater-generating operations include wastewater from the washing, dyeing and rinsing processes. In addition to wastewater from laundering and dyeing operations, the facility discharges brine from the water- softening system through a three-stage underground clarifier. 3. Hawk Industrial Uniform is a "Significant Industrial User" as defined by Part 403.3(t), Section 40, of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Code of Federal Regulations, and was fast issued a Class I permit (Permit No. 2- 1-079) to discharge industrial wastewater in May 1994. At the time of permit issuance, Hawk Industrial Uniform was classified as an industrial laundry subject to the provisions of the District's Ordinance and the local limits contained therein. 4. In May 2006, the District last renewed Permit No. 2-1-079 with a permitted flow base of 23,000 gallons per day. A copy of the permit is presented in Exhibit A to the Administrative Complaint. Page 4 of 9 52037.3 5. Hawk Industrial Uniform has no pretreatment system. 6. Hawk Industrial Uniform's Permit No. 2-1-079 states, on page 2 under`Sampling Point Location", "The sample point is a sample box and represents all industrial wastewater discharge from the facility." Both Hawk Industrial Uniform and the District have used this sample point for monitoring purposes since Permit No. 2- 1-079 was first issued in May 1994. A copy of the photograph of the sample box is presented in Exhibit B to the Administrative Complaint. 7. As of September 12, 2006, Hawk Industrial Uniform owed the District $71,891.72. Copies of the invoices due and late notices are presented in Exhibit C of the Administrative Complaint. 8. Rusty Hawkins as President and owner has been the person responsible for operations at Hawk Industrial Uniform at all material times referred to in the Administrative Complaint. His responsibilities include overseeing on a daily basis Hawk Industrial Uniform's operations and industrial wastewater discharge activities. He is also responsible for ensuring compliance with Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit conditions. A copy of Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit application signed by Rusty Hawkins is presented in Exhibit A to the Administrative Complaint. B. Discharge Violations 1. On March 16, 2006, the District inspected Hawk Industrial Uniform's facility and discovered that the wastewater from washing machines used to launder shop towels discharged via a trench to a sump, bypassing the designated sample point described in Permit No. 2-1-079. A submersible pump in the sump pumped this Page 5 of 9 31037.1 wastewater through a subterranean pipe, which re-emerged undemeath, and was hidden by, a sink on the north wall of the facility. The pipe subsequently penetrated the wall and ran alongside the building, where it discharged to a standpipe. The standpipe discharged directly to a manhole in the street, entirely bypassing the underground clarifier and the designated sample point. A diagram of the bypass plumbing and designated sample point are shown in Figure 1 to the Administrative Complaint. Photos of the corresponding locations are presented in Exhibit F to the Administrative Complaint. 2. On March 16, 2006, the pump serving the bypass was ordered to be removed from the sump, piping connections severed, and the bypass discharge standpipe outside the building capped. The photos are included as Exhibit F to the Administrative Complaint. On March 23, 2006, the District issued another Order to Cease Violation of Industrial Wastewater Permit Conditions. A copy of the Order is presented as Exhibit G to the Administrative Complaint. 3. Sampling conducted at Hawk Industrial Uniform following the removal of the bypass resulted in discharge violations of 50% of all samples subsequently collected(7 of 14 samples), as described in Table 1 below. 4. The magnitude and frequency of the TTO and O&G violations following termination of the bypass line suggest that Hawk Industrial Uniform's industrial wastewater discharge would have been in frequent and significant noncompliance without the bypass. 5. Based on the configuration of the piping bypassing the designated sample point and non-technically based discharge compliance of over 97% (39 of 40 samples), Page 6 of 9 $26937.1 EDGAIL GARRETT ❑Immediate Action Secretary to GM ❑High Ptlonty Action EMT ❑Roumv,Fdodry Action Phone: (714) 593-7101 ❑Information only Fax: (714) 962-0356 ❑To Pager: (714) ❑other E ail: ggarrett Qocsd.com Date: CAXAS S,t,Q- ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P. O. Box 8127- 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley.California 92728-8127 between January 2005 and March 2006, the District concluded that Hawk Industrial Uniform attempted to avoid representative sampling, and thus altered the monitoring data,by bypassing the designated sample point. Table 1 Onsite Sampling Violations After Discovery of Bypass Date Sample Type Constituent Concentration Over Limit Over Limit Violation m m % e 05/10/2006 Grab 2 TTO 1.64 1.06 183 Major 05/23/2006 Grab 2 TTO 11.38 10.80 1862 Major 05/23/2006 Grab 2 O&G 621.70 421.70 211 Major 05/24/2005 Grab 2 TTO 4.27 3.69 636 Major 05/24/2006 Grab 2 O&G 487.10 287.10 144 Major 05/25/2006 Grab 2 TTO 2.91 2.33 402 Major 07/10/2006 Grab 2 TTO 1.09 2.33 402 Major Onsite Sampling Violations Before Discovery of Bypass subject to Administrative Com laint 10/25/2005 Grab 2 TTO 1.80 1.22 210 Major Conclusion 1. The Steering Committee hereby finds that the General Manager's determination that Hawk Industrial Uniform avoided representative sampling, and thus altered the monitoring data, by bypassing the designated sample point described in its Permit No. 2-1-079 is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. It is further found that bypass of industrial wastewater and altering monitoring data constitutes a violation of Sections 501.4 and 604.A.4 of the District's Ordinance and Section II.A.2 and III.E of Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit. Part III.E of the permit states that knowingly making any false statement on any report or other document required by this permit or knowingly making any false statement on any report or other document required by this permit or knowingly rendering any monitoring device or method inaccurate, is a crime and may result in the Page 7 of 9 5'6957.1 imposition of criminal sanctions and/or civil penalties. The Steering Committee finds that the decision of the General Manager that a minimum thirty (30) day permit suspension of Permit No. 2-1-079, and an administrative penalty of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) for this violation is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. The Steering Committee further finds that the suspension of Permit No. 2-1-079 will begin as of January 25,2007. 2. The Steering Committee hereby finds that the General Manager's determination that Hawk was guilty of six (6) TTO and two (2) O&G violations detected during onsite sampling conducted since October 2005, and that such violations wan-anted an additional administrative penalty of Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000.00), is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. 3. The Steering Committee hereby finds that the General Manager's determination that user charges, annual invoices, penalties and finance charges are due in the amount of Seventy-One Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-One and 72/100 Dollars ($71,891.72), jointly and severally on Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins for violations of Permit No. 2-1-079 and the District's Ordinance is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. With interest to date, the Steering Committee finds the current amount owed by Hawk is $81,293.23 as of January 23, 2007. In summary, the Steering Committee has determined that it will uphold the determination of the General Manager and the monetary penalties in the total amount of One Hundred Twenty-Six Thousand Two Hundred Ninety-Three and 23/100 Dollars ($126,293.23) and that the permit suspension shall continue for a minimum of thirty (30) days and until the total amount of Page 8 of 9 5±wn.i $126,293.23 is received by the District, and until all necessary pretreatment equipment is installed and fully operational to District Stafrs satisfaction. Page 9 of 9 s69w.t (Distributed at [PROPOSED] l l Steering Committee DECISION OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE REGARDING APPEAL OF HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM AND RUSTY HAWKINS Issues Presented 1. is the General Manager's determination that Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins, its owner and President (hereinafter "Hawk") avoided representative sampling and altered the monitoring data by bypassing the designated sample point described in Permit No. 2-1-079 supported by a preponderance of the evidence? 2. Is the General Manager's determination that Hawk was guilty of eight (8) violations of its wastewater discharge limits for total toxic organics ("TTOs") and Oil and Grease (O&G) supported by a preponderance of the evidence? 3. Is the General Manager's determination that Hawk failed to pay appropriate user charges which together with penalty and finance charges amounted to $71,891.72 on the day of the award supported by a preponderance of the evidence? Finding of Facts A review of the underlying record confirms that on September 12, 2006, the District gave Hawk, notice of the Administrative Complaint and hearing notice re Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-1.079. On October 24, 2006, a hearing was held at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. Neither Rusty Hawkins nor any representative of Hawk Industrial Uniform appeared at the hearing, nor did they submit any written evidence to the Hearing Officer. On October 31, 2006, the designated Hearing Officer, Paul Martyr, presented a Recommended Decision to James Ruth, Interim General Manager of the District. In the Recommended Decision, the Hearing Officer found evidence that Hawk was responsible for the 52037 1 installation of an illegal bypass line prior to March 16, 2006. Hawk's active role in the construction of this bypass line was supported by the declaration of Larry Booher, the former production manager at Hawk Industrial Uniform. The purpose of the bypass line was determined to be the diversion of wastewater to avoid representative sampling. The Hearing Officer also found that there were eight (8) documented instances of violations of the wastewater effluent limits for TTOs and O&G. Finally, the Hearing Officer found that user charges, together with penalty and finance charges, amounted to $71,891.92 at the time of the hearing, owed by Hawk. The Hearing Officer recommended monetary penalties in the amount of$45,000.00 (for the 8 effluent violations and the operation of the bypass line) and that $71,891,72 in unpaid user chargers be assessed against Hawk Industrial Uniform and its President, Rusty Hawkins. In addition, the Hearing Officer recommended that Hawk be subject to a thirty (30) day suspension of the Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-1-079 and their ability to discharge wastewater to the District's sewerage system. The Hearing Officer further recommended that before Hawk be allowed to resume discharging wastewater to the sewerage system that they pay in full $116,891.72 and install, to the satisfaction of the District's General Manager, the necessary pretreatment equipment to reasonably assure compliance with all applicable effluent limits. On November 2, 2006, the District's General Manager sent via certified mail to Rusty Hawkins, President and Hawk Industrial Uniform, an Administrative Complaint Hearing Decision and Order re Hawk Industrial Uniform, Permit No. 2-1-079. The Hearing Decision and Order stated, in part, as follows: Page 2 of 8 5$9P 1 This letter shall serve as notice to Rusty's Dust & Towel, Inc., dba Hawk Industrial Uniform, of the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) decision and order to uphold the enclosed recommended decision of the Administrative Hearing officer, Paul Martyn, in the administrative proceeding held on October 24, 2006. The Hearing Officer has determined that grounds exist for the assessment of an administrative penalty in the amount of Forty-Five Thousand Dollars ($45,000.00) for eight discharge violations and altering the monitoring data by bypassing the designated sample point; Seventy-One Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-One and 72/100 Dollars ($71,891.72) for user charges, annual invoices, penalties and finance charges due; and permit suspension for a minimum of thirty (30) days, and until the amounts specified above are received, and the necessary pretreatment equipment to reasonably assure compliance with all applicable effluent limits is installed and operational. Therefore, I have determined that Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins, and each of them, be assessed an administrative penalty in the amount of $45,000.00 and are required to pay user charges, annual invoices, penalties and finance charges due in the amount of$71,891.72. Additionally, Hawk Industrial Uniform's Industrial wastewater Discharge Permit Number 2-1-079 is suspended for a period of not less than thirty (30) days. The permit suspension shall continue thereafter until such time as the total amount of One Hundred Sixteen Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-One and 72/100 Dollars ($116,891.72) is paid in full. The permit suspension shall also continue until the necessary pretreatment equipment to assure compliance with all applicable effluent limits is installed and operational. Please be advised that Permit No. 2-1-079 is suspended effective November 18, 2006, and the$116,891.72 must be remitted to the District,and the pretreatment system installed and operational, by December 18, 2006, unless a timely appeal is filed. If no timely appeal is filed, Hawk Industrial Uniform must cease and desist all wastewater discharges to the District's sewerage system on November 18, 2006. (November 2, 2006 Administrative Complaint Hearing Decision and Order) On November 17, 2006, Hawk filed an appeal to the District's Steering Committee. On December 21, 2006, the District provided notice to Rusty Hawkins, President and Hawk Industrial Uniform of the fact that the appeal hearing would be conducted on January 24, 2007 at 5:00 p.m. at the District's offices located at 10844 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley, California. sxwn.i Page 3 of 8 A. Regulations and Facts Applicable to Hawk Industrial Uniform I. Hawk Industrial Uniform is an industrial laundry that rents and washes soiled uniforms, floor mats, dust mops, gloves and shop towels. Hawk Industrial Uniform also dyes and bleaches new shop towels and other materials. After washing, the items are dried, ironed as necessary, sorted, and returned to the respective clients. 2. Hawk Industrial Uniform's wastewater-generating operations include wastewater from the washing, dyeing and rinsing processes. In addition to wastewater from laundering and dyeing operations, the facility discharges brine from the water- softening system through a three-stage underground clarifier. 3. Hawk Industrial Uniform is a "Significant Industrial User" as defined by Part 403.3(t), Section 40, of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Code of Federal Regulations, and was first issued a Class 1 permit (Permit No. 2- 1-079) to discharge industrial wastewater in May 1994. At the time of permit issuance, Hawk Industrial Uniform was classified as an industrial laundry subject to the provisions of the District's Ordinance and the local limits contained therein. 4. In May 2006, the District last renewed Permit No. 2-1-079 with a permitted Flow base of 23,000 gallons per day. A copy of the permit is presented in Exhibit A to the Administrative Complaint. 5. Hawk Industrial Uniform has no pretreatment system. 6. Hawk Industrial Uniform's Permit No. 2-1-079 states, on page 2 under "Sampling Point Location", "The sample point is a sample box and represents all industrial wastewater discharge from the facility." Both Hawk Industrial Uniform and the 526937 1 Page 4 of 8 District have used this sample point for monitoring purposes since Permit No. 2- 1-079 was first issued in May 1994. A copy of the photograph of the sample box is presented in Exhibit B to the Administrative Complaint. 7. As of September 12, 2006, Hawk Industrial Uniform owed the District $71,891.72. Copies of the invoices due and late notices are presented in Exhibit C of the Administrative Complaint. 8. Rusty Hawkins as President and owner has been the person responsible for operations at Hawk Industrial Uniform at all material times referred to in the Administrative Complaint. His responsibilities include overseeing on a daily basis Hawk Industrial Uniform's operations and industrial wastewater discharge activities. He is also responsible for ensuring compliance with Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit conditions. A copy of Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit application signed by Rusty Hawkins is presented in Exhibit A to the Administrative Complaint. B. Discharge Violations 1. On March 16, 2006, the District inspected Hawk Industrial Uniform's facility and discovered that the wastewater from washing machines used to launder shop towels discharged via a trench to a sump, bypassing the designated sample point described in Permit No. 2-1-079. A submersible pump in the sump pumped this wastewater through a subterranean pipe, which re-emerged underneath, and was hidden by, a sink on the north wall of the facility. The pipe subsequently penetrated the wall and ran alongside the building, where it discharged to a standpipe. The standpipe discharged directly to a manhole in the street, entirely 5369171 Page 5 of 8 District have used this sample point for monitoring purposes since Permit No. 2- 1-079 was first issued in May 1994. A copy of the photograph of the sample box is presented in Exhibit B to the Administrative Complaint. 7. As of September 12, 2006, Hawk Industrial Uniform owed the District $71,891.72. Copies of the invoices due and late notices are presented in Exhibit C of the Administrative Complaint. 8. Rusty Hawkins as President and owner has been the person responsible for operations at Hawk Industrial Uniform at all material times referred to in the Administrative Complaint. His responsibilities include overseeing on a daily basis Hawk Industrial Uniform's operations and industrial wastewater discharge activities. He is also responsible for ensuring compliance with Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit conditions. A copy of Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit application signed by Rusty Hawkins is presented in Exhibit A to the Administrative Complaint. B. Discharge Violations 1. On March 16, 2006, the District inspected Hawk Industrial Uniform's facility and discovered that the wastewater from washing machines used to launder shop towels discharged via a trench to a sump, bypassing the designated sample point described in Permit No. 2-1-079. A submersible pump in the sump pumped this wastewater through a subterranean pipe, which re-emerged underneath, and was hidden by, a sink on the north wall of the facility. The pipe subsequently penetrated the wall and ran alongside the building, where it discharged to a standpipe. The standpipe discharged directly to a manhole in the street, entirely Page 5 of 8 526937 1 bypassing the underground clarifier and the designated sample point. A diagram of the bypass plumbing and designated sample point are shown in Figure 1 to the Administrative Complaint. Photos of the corresponding locations are presented in Exhibit F to the Administrative Complaint. 2. On March 16,2006,the pump serving the bypass was ordered to be removed from the sump, piping connections severed, and the bypass discharge standpipe outside the building capped. The photos are included as Exhibit F to the Administrative Complaint. On March 23, 2006, the District issued another Order to Cease Violation of Industrial Wastewater Permit Conditions. A copy of the Order is presented as Exhibit G to the Administrative Complaint. 3. Sampling conducted at Hawk Industrial Uniform following the removal of the bypass resulted in discharge violations of 50% of all samples subsequently collected (7 of 14 samples),as described in Table 1 below. 4. The magnitude and frequency of the TTO and O&G violations following termination of the bypass line suggest that Hawk Industrial Uniform's industrial wastewater discharge would have been in frequent and significant noncompliance without the bypass. 5. Based on the configuration of the piping bypassing the designated sample point and non-technically based discharge compliance of over 97% (39 of 40 samples), between January 2005 and March 2006, the District concluded that Hawk Industrial Uniform attempted to avoid representative sampling, and thus altered the monitoring data,by bypassing the designated sample point. Page 6 of 8 52M7I Table 1 Subsequent Onsite Sampling Violations Date Sample Type Constituent Concentration Over Limit Over Limit Violation m m % Type 05/10/2006 Grab 2 TTO 1.64 1.06 183 Major 05/23/2006 Grab 2 TTO 11.38 10.80 1862 Major 05/23/2006 Grab 2 O&G 621.70 421.70 211 Major 05/24/2005 Grab 2 TTO 4.27 3.69 636 Major 05/24/2006 Grab 2 O&G 487.10 287.10 144 Major 05/25/2006 Grab 2 TTO 2.91 2.33 402 Major 07/102006 Grab 2 T'r0 1.09 2.33 402 Major Conclusion 1. The Steering Committee hereby finds that the General Manager's determination that Hawk Industrial Uniform avoided representative sampling, and thus altered the monitoring data, by bypassing the designated sample point described in its Permit No. 2-1-079 is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. It is further found that bypass of industrial wastewater and altering monitoring data constitutes a violation of Sections 501.4 and 604.A.4 of the District's Ordinance and Section II.A.2 and HLE of Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit. Part HLE of the permit states that knowingly making any false statement on any report or other document required by this permit or knowingly making any false statement on any report or other document required by this permit or knowingly rendering any monitoring device or method inaccurate, is a crime and may result in the imposition of criminal sanctions and/or civil penalties. The Steering Committee finds that the decision of the General Manager that a minimum thirty (30) day permit suspension of Permit No. 2-1-079, and an administrative penalty of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) for this violation is supported by a preponderance Page 7 of 8 srsvn.i of the evidence. The Steering Committee further finds that the suspension of Permit No. 2-1-079 will begin as of January 25, 2007. 2. The Steering Committee hereby finds that the General Manager's determination that Hawk was guilty of six (6) TTO and two (2) O&G violations detected during onsite sampling conducted since October 2005, and that such violations warranted an additional administrative penalty of Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000.00), is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. 3. The Steering Committee hereby finds that the General Manager's determination that user charges, annual invoices, penalties and finance charges are due in the amount of Seventy-One Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-One and 72/100 Dollars ($71,891.72), jointly and severally on Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins for violations of Permit No. 2-1-079 and the District's Ordinance is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. With interest to date, the Steering Committee finds the current amount owed by Hawk is $81,293.23 as of January 23, 2007. In summary, the Steering Committee has determined that it will uphold the determination of the General Manager and the monetary penalties in the total amount of One Hundred Twenty-Six Thousand Two Hundred Ninety-Three and 23/100 Dollars ($126,293.23) and that the permit suspension shall continue for a minimum of thirty (30) days and until the total amount of $126,293.23 is received by the District, and until all necessary pretreatment equipment is installed and fully operational to District Staffs satisfaction. Page 8 of 8 526937 1 CERTIFIED COPY ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT STEERING COMMITTEE HEARING 'I In re the Matter of ) APPEAL BY HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM) ,r COMPANY ON DECISION TO SUSPEND ) HAWK' S WASTEWATER DISCHARGE ) PERMIT ) .r Reporter ' s Transcript of Proceedings • Wednesday, January 24 , 2007 5 : 49 P.M. p E OF GRAN I E IN T SW20N DIASRTRICT FEB 2 7 ��zJ BY.6 K, Location: Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Califoril>NI I<OFEE OFFI E OM rvsaw a a„- FEB 28 2007 Reporter : Deborah L. Chadwick, CSR Certificate No. 4146 TORNELL & COTTFN PROFESSIONAL COURT REPORTERS 1401 N.TUSTIN AVE., STE, 160 11 f{ _ SANTA ANA, CA 92705 (714) www.lornellandcotam.com IIII��IIIII��IIII 1IIIIIIIIIIII e-mail: depoa®tornellandcotten.cor. 00190950715750 FAX(714) 543-1643.1614 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS - STEERING COMMITTEE HEARING - 01/24/67 1 INDEX ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 2 (Witnesses Batted by the OCSD) STEERING COMMITTEE NEARING 3 Witness: Direct Croce Redirect RRtross 4 ANGELA BRANDT S 5 In re the Matter of 6 APPEALL BY XppALLpp11K�K� ppUSTppIA Utt1FFOHM 7 E��ASYWONTEYA�ERaU15CHFRGEEND S PERMIT PASS 9 E X H I B I T S 10 (None) 11 12 Reporter's Transcript of Proceedings 13 14 Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:49 P.M. 15 16 17 18 19 Location: n e tc Ont Sanitation District 20 ounta'In Nall.ey usal if ornia 21 22 23 Reporter: 24 DCa L Cpadutrl CSR 25 artrt tcaie o. 1 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA CHAIRMAN: JIM FERRYMAN 2 WEDNESDAY,JANUARY 24,2007 3 5:49 P.M. APPEARANCES OF COJNSEL: 4 5 CHAIR FERRYMAN: This is an appeal by Hawk For Steering Committee: 6 Industrial Uniform Company of the General Manager's WOODRUFF SPRApLIN JSJMART 7 decision to suspend Hawk's Wastewater Discharge Permit TER Y A paaUS 1 Br i Nigh Suite 8000 8 and impose fees and penalties for alleged violations of Y5f�4es5 e�� Brn 9 the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations. 10 This proceeding is governed by the Rules of For Orange County Byaprptlettgon District: 11 Procedure adapted by Resolution No.OCSD 98-13. It dQODRUFF GSiPAp&�NUGTON.LIFE 12 onil be transcribed by a ceniried court reposer,who 59 i SBCcuutt erker Stag Sul to 5000 13 will also swear in anyone called upon to twisty. (fyttgeS5j rnia 14 1 will now open me hearing and ask the �) 15 patties to imroduce themselves. For Appellant; 16 Who is here for the District? NO APPEARANCES 17 MR. FARRINGTON: Craig Farrington's here on behalf 18 of the District. ALM PRESENT: 19 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Who is here for the Pennines? ANGELA NRANDT 20 Seeing no one come forward,appears that they STEERING COMMITTEE 21 haven't showed up. 22 Dees staff have a pressmation? 23 MR.FARRINGTON: lust a brief one,in light of the 24 fact that the Appellant hasn't appeared. 25 The purpose of this hearing is to review the Pages 14 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS - STEERING COMMITTEE HEARING - 01/24/07 1 decision that was made by the General Manager and I outside the building. There was a Its of time and 2 determine whether Nose decisions are supported by a 2 expense that went into putting in this bypass line,and 3 prepondereuce of the evidence. We're supposed to look 3 it's--there's just no logical basis for arguing that 4 at the record that was made. 4 nobody else had any knowledge of this. 5 Prior in this time,they did have a hearing. 5 In addition,there was a declaration from 6 The Appellant did not appear. The only evidence that's 6 Lary Brewer,and it's Attachment A to Exhibit H. And 7 been submitted up to this point has been submitted on 7 in the declaration,he says under oath that m long as 8 behalf of the District's staff. 8 he's been employed there,that's what they have been 9 Attached with the information that we were 9 doing. And that was done under the supervision of the 10 given is the Administrative Complaint. And there are a 10 president of the company. And that all the employees 11 number of exhibits to the Complaint. 11 were encouraged to make sure that anything that wait 12 There's also Exhibit H,which is additional 12 going in be questionable with regard to its limits was 13 documentation pertaining in this answer. 13 to bypass the sampling area and make sure it went 14 And since they chose not m appear than and 14 directly into the sewer line. 15 they're not appearing now,I'll kind of quickly go IS So on one hand,we have the declaration of 16 through the process,just s,that you have some 16 Mr.Brewer. On the other hand,all we have is the 17 information upon which to—verbal information,in 17 unsigned appeal,which raises the issue about who's 18 addition in the evidence,to make a decision, 18 going to be responsible. 19 There's three essential Findings that were 19 Finally, if you look at Exhibit—I'm sorry, 20 made in the underlying hearing. One is that Hawk 20 Attachment B in Exhibit H.there is the signature of 21 Industries and the Appellant created an illegal bypass 21 Rusty Hawkins,who's the president of the organization, 22 line that was designed—it was hard-plumbed,mn 22 where he is basically putting tarry Brewer in the 23 outside the building,connected in with the sewer line 23 position of their manager and acting on behalf of the 24 in such a way that it missed the testing point the 24 organization. So to the extent his argument is, "He 25 District would have had. And that is a clear violation 25 was an employee and we're not responsible," his awn 1 of the District otdinaram as well as the permit. And 1 signature made that employe tine responsible employee 2 details are laid out in the Administrative Complaint. 2 for making sure that they're in compliance. 3 Also,there was a finding that the Appellants 3 With regard to the user fees,we'll just ask 4 were guilty of eight violations of the Wastewater 4 our representative from amounting to come up and,very 5 Discharge Limit for total toxic organics. And those, 5 briefly,confirm the accuracy of the numbers. 6 again,are violations of District ordinances. And they 6 And they're going to need in put you under 7 both invoke a civil penalty and potential for 7 oath. 8 suspension. 8 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Can I have ha being swore in by 9 And then the final finding then wait made by 9 the coon reporter. 10 the General Manager was that they have failed in pay 10 I I their user fits,at which together with penalties at 11 ANGEIA BRANDT, 12 the time of the underlying hearing was S71,891.72. 12 called as a witness on behalf of the OCSD, 13 We do have somebody from accounting here who 13 and having been duly sworn by the 14 can verify the accuracy of those documents and then 14 Certified Shorthand Reporter,was examined 15 also indicate that as of today,the new number would be 15 and testified as follows: 16 $81,293.23. 16 17 The only grounds for appal raised by the 17 EXAMINATION 18 Appellant,we got a lever. And it's Attachment E to IS 19 Exhibit H,which you have. And basically,they have 19 BY MR. FARRINGI'ON: 20 raised in the lever two basic argumenn. The first 20 Q. Can you please sale your full name for the 21 one is that the company's not responsible for any of 21 record. 22 these violations because they had an employee named 22 A. Angela Brandt,B-R-A-N-D-T. 23 Larry Brewer who was doing this. Nobody else knew 23 Q. What's you position here with the District? 24 about it. 24 A. Amounting supervisor. 25 Again, it was a hard-plumbed line that ran 25 Q. At my request,did you have a chance to review Pages 5-8 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS - STEERING COM3HTTEE HEARING - 01/24/67 - a I the accounting records with regard to the Hawk l However,it's been clarified for me now. In fact, 2 Industrial Uniform? 2 we've made for the record— 3 A. Yes,1 did. I pulled the—his current 3 MR. RUTH: My understanding,he's nee currently 4 account balances,to see what they are,and they do 4 employed. He has his own business at this time. 5 match what Mr. Farrington referenced,$91,293.23. 5 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Any other questions from the 6 That includes his quarterly user charges, 6 Boerd9 7 along with finance charges that he receives on a 7 Any final statements by the smfr? 8 monthly basis and 10 percent penalties that he receives 8 MR. FARRINGTON: You know,the only thing that I 9 when he doesn't pay. 9 wanted to add to the record,is there's two additional 10 And he has only made two payments. He made 10 exhibits. One is Exhibit I.which is orrice of 11 his appeal—he paid for the appeal,$400,that fee, 11 tonight's hearing. I want to make sure ifs pan of 12 and he did pay w have his permit renewed,which he has 12 the record. 13 to have to have that permit current. However,he bas 13 And then Exhibit J is actually a transcript of 14 not made any attempt to pay any of his user fees. 14 the hearing that occurred before,when they didn't 15 Q. When was the last time he made any payment? 15 show. With dsose two additions— 16 A. Leal one was--he paid his renewal fee 16 CHAIR FERRYMAN: So he's been duly notified,and 17 July IOth of 2006,but the last time he made a payment 17 there's no reason for him on to be here other than he 18 towards the user fee was August 1st,2005, 18 chose tent to show? 19 So he's comacted on a monthly basis,received 19 MR. FARRINGTON: No. And to show that he 20 statements,phone calls,along with all phone calls 20 acknowledged he was notified,he did send in the 21 from accounting and then also receives phone calls from 21 request for the appeal. So he understood this process 22 Source Control. 22 was smiting. 23 MR. FARRINGTON: 1 have no further questions. 23 CHAIR FERRYMAN: No anyone prepared a proposed 24 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Obviously,the Permilta has no 24 decision and findings for the Staring Committee to 25 presentation,since he's not here. 25 consider? 1 Are there any questions by the Steering 1 MR. FARRINGTON: I do have a proposed decision as 2 Committee? 2 well. 3 MR. LUEBBEN: The question is a clarification. 3 CHAIR FERRYMAN: While Mahin's distributing this 4 You said that Exhibit E, it was unsigned. 4 material,we're just going to go ahead,take a 5 Looks like it is signed on page 2. 5 five-minute break and,you know,digest this 6 MR. CRANDALL: It's not signed under penalty of 6 information,and then we'll come back and make our 7 perjury. 7 decision. 8 MR.FARRINGTON: Yeah. Arid thank you for the 8 MR.ANDERSON: During that break,are we off the 9 oorranion. It is signed. It's not under penalty of 9 retard? 10 perjury. And it,frankly,wasn't presented in the 10 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Yes. 11 underlying action. It wasn't presented here at the 11 (Recess taken.) 12 time we were presenting evidence. And,actually,under 12 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Back on the record. 13 the rules,they're required to be here in order to 13 While we're waiting for him,is there any 14 amwer any questions,present any evidence they may 14 discussion on what we reviewed? Any questions? 15 have. And,technically,this document says, '1 want an 15 MS. GREEN: Doug and I did find out we really are 16 appeal,"and then there's a procedure for them to bring W on the some page— 17 additional evidence in into question. At this point, 17 MR. DAVERT: Mr. Chairman,1 think you had proposed 18 none of that's been done. 18 to the Staring Committee regarding the appeal of Hawk 19 MR.CRANDALL: Okay. My question to the General 19 Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins,and 1 would move 20 Manager today was Mr. Brewer's declaration,it was 20 that we adopt the proposed findings and decision as 21 dated October 24,20U6. He indicated that he was Oat 21 written. I thick it'a very complete. 1 think it's an 22 employed with the Hawk Industrial on March 3rd,4th, 22 accurate reflection of the record thus far and an 23 '98 and had worked for him for nine years. 23 accurate or an appropriate response to everything 24 My math shows that's in 2007,which caused me 24 that's been presented here today. 25 a little bit of angst when I found out timely. 25 So that would be my motion. Pages 9-12 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS - STEERING COMMITTEE HEARING - 01/24/07 1 MR.LUEBBEN: 1 would second that. 1 2 MR.CRANDALL: Can we also tack on whatever 2 REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE 3 attorney fees and costs we have? 3 4 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Well,we'll get to that after. 4 1,Deborah L.Chadwick,a Certified Shorthand 5 1 don't think— 5 Reporter of the State of California with principal 6 MR.DAVERT: The issue before us is whether we 6 office in the County of Orange,do hereby certify that 7 sternum the General Matuger's action. That's, 7 the foregoing proceeding was written by me in Stenotype 8 commially.what this is. 8 and transcribed into typewriting and dust the foregoing 9 CHAIR FERRYMAN: I think what remedies we'll go 9 is a true and cortCCt copy of my shonhand notes 10 after,we'll discuss dose after we take this motion, 10 thereof. 11 consider this notion. 11 12 Any other discussion? Any objemion? 12 13 MR.LUEBBEN: Want to voice-vme on this? 13 t Icale - 14 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Yeah,maybe we ought to do a voice 14 15 vote. 15 16 Gail? 16 Dated: 17 MS.GARRETT: Cathy Green? 17 18 MS.GREEN: Aye. I8 19 MS.GARRETT: Phil Luebben? 19 20 MR.LUEBBEN: Yes. 20 21 MS.GARRETT: Lent'Crandall? 21 22 MR.CRANDALL: Yens. 22 23 MS. GARRETT: Steve Anderson? 23 24 MR.ANDERSON: (No audible response.) 24 25 MS.GARRETT: Mike Waldman? 25 1 MR.WALDMAN: Yes. 2 MS.GARRETT: Doug Davart? 3 MR.DAVERT: Ya. 4 MS.GARRETT: Mr.Ferryman? 5 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Yes. 6 Okay. Motion carries. 7 We'll give Steve a chance to throw his hot in 8 the ring here. 9 MR.DAVERT: He didn't get a motion. 10 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Now,a far as remedies go— I I MR.DAVERT: Hold on a second. 12 Dar that conclude our proceeding? 13 MR.ANDRUS: Yes,it does. 14 The hearing is closed. 15 MR.DAVERT: So we're off the record? 16 MR.ANDRUS: Right. 17 MR.DAVERT: Thank you. IS (The proceedings concluded a 6:10 p.m.) 19 eee 20 21 22 23 24 25 Pages 13-16 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS-STEERING COMMITTEE HEARING-01124107 a0empim9:14 DAYERT a11Z1713:614:2,3, 13:7 attorney In 13:3 9,11,15.17 give in 14:7 $400 n19:11 audible in 13:24 Deborah m 15:4 given n15:10 $71,891.72 in 6:12 August m 9:18 decision in 4:75:1.1811:24 got in 6.18 BB129323 m6:169:5 Aye 11113:18 121,7,20 govemod m 4:10 * decisions to52 GREEN 1a112:151307,18 B declaration 1417:5,7,1510:20 grounds in 6:17 or 14:19 9-R-A-N-D-T in 822 designed in 5:22 guilty n16:4 back nt 12:6,12 details 1116:2 balancesln9A determine(it 5:2 H 1Om&e basic m6:20 digest n112:5 hand m7:15,16 10119:8 buicalN 1:18:19722 Direct m 3:3 hard-plmnbedm5226:25 10thnj9g beslala%'39:B,19 directly nt 7:14 hat a114:7 behalf mi 4:17 5:8 7:23 8:12 Discharge 1314:7.98.5 Hawk 1s14:55:209:110:221Z. 2 bit(it 10:25 discuss nt 13:10 18 Board at 11:6 discussion In 12:1413:12 Hawk's n14.'7 2 n11OS both m6:7 distributingg 1112:3 Hawkins or 7211Z19 m9.18 BItANDTm3:48:1122 District 1m 4:16,185.256:1,68:hearing an 4:14,25 5:5,20 6:12 2008m9:171O:21 break 1211Z5,8 23 11:11,1414:14 20D7m421024 Brewert4i6237:6,16,22 District's IN 4:95:8 hereby n115:6 24 m 4:21021 Brewers ni 10:20 document m 10:15 Hold 11114:11 3 brief m4:23 documentationut5:13 However as 9:1311:1 briefly 1118:5 documents tit 6:14 Still sit 10:22 bring n110:16 doing 1216:2379 4 building at 5237:1 done m 79 WAS fllegal 111521 business m 11:4 Doug at 12:7514:2 impose in 4:8 4146 in 15:13 bypass tat 5217:2,13 duly 18:1311:16 includesm4,6 4th to 10:22 ng in indicatem6:15 C Dur 5 Indicated m 10:21 CALIFORNIA a)4:1 15:5 Industrial 1414.69:210.2212: 5:49 in 4:3 called 131324:138:12 eight(i16:4 19 s calls 1319:20,20,21 employed m 7:810:2211:4 Industriesu15:21 carries 11114:6 employee 14)6:22 7:25 8:1,1 Information 14159,17,17126 6:10m 14:18 Cathy n113:17 employessu1T70 Introduce in 4:15 caused in 1024 encouraged to 7:11 Invoke In 6:7 8 CERTIFICATE m 15:Z13 essential m5:19 Issue m 7:1713:6 6 or 3:4 certified tat 4:128.1415A essentially in 13:8 9 certify In 15:6 everything ut 1223 J Chadwick in ISA evidence 1615:3,6,1810:1Z14, JANUARY1n4:2 98 in 1023 CHAIR nm 4:5,198:89,.2411:517 July in 9:17 98.13m4:11 16,2312:3,10,1213:4.9.1414: EXAMINATION in 8:17 5.10 examined m 8:14 K Chairman m 12:17 Exhibit an 5:126:197:6,19.20 A kno m dge chance or9: ,7 exhibit w5: lelow n+17:/ 15 accomdnl9:a charges m1411 exhibits mS1111:10 �9e account6g m&198:424$1, chose ut 5:1411:1g expense nr 4 L 21 civil m6g extent w7:24 laMm8:2 accurecym6:148:5 clarification m 10:3 F Larry 1416237:6,7213:21 accurate as 12:2223 clarified in 11:1 hest tat 9:15,16,1 acknowledgedm1120 clearm525 fact ut 4:2411:1 acting mi7: dosed in 14:14 failed ur&10 letter or 6:18.20 action an 10:1113:7 come rat 4:20&41Z6 tar 12112:2214:10 IL"m4:23 actually m f0:1211:13 Committee im 10:211:2412: FARRINGTON at 4:17238:19 Umttm8.5 add m 11:9 18 9:5,2310;811:8,1912:1 limits1117:12 addition m5:187:5 Company 1214:67:10 Farington'a m4:17 line 1515:22236:257:2,14 additional tat 5:1210:17119 company's 1116:21 feemi 9:11,16,18 IcgIcaI 0:25 adtllfionsn111:15 Complaint 1315:10,1162 fees rn 4:86:118:391413:3 logical nt7:9 Administrative m 5:106:2 complete m 12:21 FERRYMAN net 45,198:89: tong m7:7 adopt in 12:211 compliance it 82 11:5,16231Z3,10,1213:4,9, look ur 5:97:19 adopted n14:11 conclude ut 14:12 14 14:415,10 Looks in 10:5 ahead to 12:4 concluded n114:18 final rat 6911:7 lot in 7:1 allegedn14:8 confirm in 8:5 Finally 1117:19 LUEBBEN 1s110:313:1,13,19, ANDERSON tat 12:8132324 connected in 5:23 financeu19:7 20 ANDRUS at 14:13,16 consider m 112513:11 find III 1Z15 M ANGELA 1313:48:1122 contacted to9:19 finding m&3,9 angst 10:25 Control in 922 findings car 5:19112412:20 made nn 5:1,4206:9&1&10, answer ro 10'.14 copy nt 15:9 first In 6:2010:21 10,14,15.1711:2 appeal 11114:56:177:179:11,11 correct 111159 five-minute to 125 Mahfn's to 12:3 10:1611:2112:18 correction at 10:9 follows 1118:15 Managerm 5:1&1072310: appearm5:6,14 costs ur 13:9 foregoing or 15:7,8 20 appeared at 4:24 County in 15:6 forward of 4:20 Manag✓sm4:613:7 appearing n15:15 court m 4:128:9 round m 1025 Marchm1D.22 appears to 4:20 Cm Ia n14:17 FOUNTAINm4:1 matchm9S Appellant 1414245:6216:18 CRANDALLm 10:6,1913:2, franklI•y.{.m10:10 me rIalm12:4 Appellants n16:3 21,22 full u1 a:20 math n110:24 appropriate n112:23 created In5:21 furthe 23 mattenn 5:13 area m 7:13 Cross in 3:3 Mike(it 13:25 arguing nt7:3 cumentm9:3,13 G missed ut 5:24 argument,117:24 curemly In 11:3 Gail in 13:16 monthlym9:8,19 arguments 1116:20 GARRTm 13:17,192123, motion 1s112:2513:10,11 14:6, ET Attached u15:9 D 2514:2,4 9 Attachment in 6:18 7:6.20 dated m 10:21 15:16 General is14:6 5:1 6:10 10:19 move n112:19 TORNELL&COTTEN PROFESSIONAL COURT REPORTERS (714)543.16W 9400-move TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS-STEERING COMMITTEE HEARING-01/24/07 MS rot 121513:17,18,19,2123, swear art 4:13 2514:2.4 Q mom me 8:8,13 N quarterly art 9:6 T question m 10:3.17,19 name art 8:20 gLmdk noble n17:12 tack nl 13:2 named n16:22 queatlom un 9:23 10:1,14 11:5 technically(it 10:15 need(it 8:6 12:14 testified art 8:15 new nl 6:15 qulckly ni 5:15 tos ft 1114:13 nine art 10:23 testing art 5:24 Nobody m16:237:4 R themselves art 4:15 Notts in 3:1010:18 raised u16:17,20 There's us 5:12,19711016 Me"art 159 raises art 7:17 11:9,17 notice el 11:10 ran u16:25 thereof tit 15:10 notified me 11:16,20 really art 12:15 three n15:19 number mi IRA 16:15 reason tit 11:17 throw 1t114:7 numbers in 8:5 received art 9:19 timely al 10:25 receives me 9:7,821 today 1336:15 10:20 12:24 Recess art 12:11 togetherni SAl oath us 7:7 8:7 record we 5:4 8:21 112,9,12 tonight's ttt 11:11 objection of 13:12 12:9,12,2214:15 total m 6:5 Obviouslym924 recordsin9:1 towards at 9:18 occurred tit 11:14 Recrass art 3:3 toxic to 6:5 OCSDm3:24:118:12 Redirect tit3:3 transcribed m4:1215:8 October nl 10:21 referenced tit 9.5 transcripptm 11:13 office in 15:6 reflection tit 12:22 true r1115'9 Okay me 10:1914:6 regard t317:128:39:7 two 1416.20 9:10 11:9,15 one m 4:20.235:20 6:217:15 regarding lit 12:18 tYpewrifi g art 15:8 91611.10 Regulationst114:9 U only 1415:66:179.1011:8 remedies u119:914:10 open n14:14 renewal ct9:16 under cat 7:7,98:610.,SA,12 Orange al 15:6 renewed 1119:12 underlying me 5:206:1210:11 order el 10:13 reporter W 4:12 8:9,1415:5 understanding tit 11:3 ordinances m6:1,6 REPORTER'S 11115:2 understood art 11:21 organics in 6:5 representative 1118:4 Uniform me 4:692 IZ19 organwation m 72124 request t218:25 1121 unsigned m 7:17101.4 other 1417:1611:5,1713.12 regwred u110:13 tip me 4:21518:4 ought 11113:14 Resolationm4:11 usertsi SAI 8:39:6,14,18 oum16:210:251215 responstimi12231324 outside m15:237:1 responsible m 6:217:18258: V own m17:2511:4 1 VALLIEVso,11 P review 1214:25 SM verbsi m S.17 reviewed art 12:14 m 6:14 P.M m 4:314:18 m 14:8 violation tit 525 papa 2)10.5 Mill flu m14:1010:13 violations;m 4:86:4,6,22 pad m9:11,16 roaru15:22 Wks,u113:14 part a111:11 Rush me 7:21 12:19 voice-vob m 13:13 patties In 4:15 R el 113 vote tit 13:15 pay Rt6:109d1,12,14 S W payment m 9c15,17 payments art St10 same art 12:16 wailing 11112:13 penalties In 4:86:11 9:8 samplinrgg tit 7:13 Waldman m 13:2514:1 penahymt6:710:6,9 sayam17:710:15 wanted tit 11:9 percent nl 9:8 second m 13:114:11 Wastewater m 4:7,96:4 geperjury me 10:7,10 see 1119:4 warYm 5:24 Perms l414:76:19:12,13 Seeing art 420 WEDNESDAYm42 Prmitt"m 4:19 924 send e1 11:20 whatever tit 132 perreining et 5:13 sewer 1216237:14 whether m 5:213:6 Fhit n113:19 Shorthand m 8:1415:4,9 who's l217:1721 phone 1319:20,20,21 show 13111:15,18,19 will(314:12.13.14 please 1118:20 showed u1421 Wknessm3:38:12 point 1315:7,2410:17 shows u110:24 WBnessesu19:2 position 1217:238.23 signaturem7:208:1 worked el 10:23 potential u)6:7 signed on 10:5,6,9 written me 122115:7 prepared m 11:23 since me5:149:25 preponderance art 6:3 somebody in 6:13 Y present nl 10:14 sonym7:19 years tit 10:23 presentation me 4:22925 Source nl 922 presented13110A0,1112:24 staff 1314:22 5:8 11:7 presenting art 10:12 starting art 11:22 presidentm7:10,21 state(218:2015:5 principal nl 15:5 statements m 9:2011:7 Prior n15:5 Steering 13110:111:2412:18 Procedure m14:11 10:16 Stenotype art 15:7 proceeding me 4:1014:12 15:7 Steve 121 13:2314:7 proceedings to 14:16 submitted m5:7,7 process m 5:161121 supervision tit 7:9 proposed 14111:2312:1,17,20 supervisortn8:24 pulled mg:3 supported(it 5:2 purpose art 425 supposed tit 5:3 put tit 8:6 suspend art 4:7 putting meT.2,22 suspension art 6:8 sustam m 13:7 MS•ysers TORNELL 6 COTTEN PROFESSIONAL COURT REPORTERS V14)543.1600 1 2 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 3 STEERING COMMITTEE HEARING 4 5 6 In re the Matter of ) 7 APPEAL BY HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM) COMPANY ON DECISION TO SUSPEND ) 8 HAWK' S WASTEWATER DISCHARGE ) PERMIT ) 9 ) 10 11 12 13 Reporter' s Transcript of Proceedings 14 Wednesday, January 24, 2007 15 5 : 49 P.M. 16 17 18 19 20 Location: Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue 21 Fountain Valley, California 22 23 24 Reporter: 25 Deborah L. Chadwick, CSR Certificate No. 4146 1 s d 1 2 CHAIRMAN: JIM FERRYMAN 3 4 APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL: 5 6 For Steering Committee: 7 WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN 6 SMART BY: TERRY ANDRUS, ESQ. 8 701 South Parker Street, Suite 8000 Orange, California 92868 9 (714) 558-7000 10 11 For Orange County Sanitation District: 12 WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN 6 SMART BY: CRAIG FARRINGTON, ESQ. 13 701 South Parker Street, Suite 8000 'r Orange, California 92868 14 (714) 558-7000 15 16 For Appellant: 17 NO APPEARANCES 18 19 ALSO PRESENT: r 20 ANGELA BRANDT 21 STEERING COMMITTEE 22 23 24 25 r 2 r 1 I N D E X 2 (Witnesses called by the OCSD) 3 Witness : Direct Cross Redirect Recross 4 ANGELA BRANDT 8 v 5 6 7 8 9 E X N I B I T S 10 (None) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 0 23 24 25 3 I FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 2 WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 24 , 2007 3 5:49 P.M. 4 5 CHAIR FERRYMAN: This is an appeal by Hawk 6 Industrial Uniform Company of the General Manager' s 7 decision to suspend Hawk' s Wastewater Discharge Permit 8 and impose fees and penalties for alleged violations of 9 the District' s Wastewater Discharge Regulations . 10 This proceeding is governed by the Rules of 11 Procedure adopted by Resolution No . OCSD 96-13. It 12 will be transcribed by a certified court reporter, who 13 will also swear in anyone called upon to testify. 14 I will now open the hearing and ask the 15 parties to introduce themselves . 16 Who is here for the District? 17 MR. FARRINGTON: Craig Farrington' s here on behalf 18 of the District. 19 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Who is here for the Permittee? 20 Seeing no one come forward, appears that they 21 haven ' t showed up. 22 Does staff have a presentation? 23 MR. FARRINGTON: Just a brief one, in light of the 24 fact that the Appellant hasn' t appeared. 25 The purpose of this hearing is to review the 4 r I decision that was made by the General Manager and 2 determine whether those decisions are supported by a 3 preponderance of the evidence. We're supposed to look 4 at the record that was made. 5 Prior to this time, they did have a hearing. 6 The Appellant did not appear. The only evidence that' s 7 been submitted up to this point has been submitted on 8 behalf of the District' s staff. 9 Attached with the information that we were 10 given is the Administrative Complaint. And there are a 11 number of exhibits to the Complaint. 12 There' s also Exhibit H, which is additional 13 documentation pertaining to this matter . 14 And since they chose not to appear then and 15 they' re not appearing now, I ' ll kind of quickly go 16 through the process, just so that you have some v 17 information upon which to -- verbal information, in 18 addition to the evidence, to make a decision. 19 There' s three essential findings that were 20 made in the underlying hearing. One is that Hawk 21 Industries and the Appellant created an illegal bypass 22 line that was designed -- it was hard-plumbed, run 23 outside the building, connected in with the sewer line 24 in such a way that it missed the testing point the 25 District would have had. And that is a clear violation V 5 V 1 of the District ordinances as well as the permit. And 2 details are laid out in the Administrative Complaint. 3 Also, there was a finding that the Appellants 4 were guilty of eight violations of the Wastewater 5 Discharge Limit for total toxic organics . And those, 6 again, are violations of District ordinances . And they 7 both invoke a civil penalty and potential for 8 suspension. 9 And then the final finding that was made by 10 the General Manager was that they have failed to pay 11 their user fees, at which together with penalties at 12 the time of the underlying hearing was $71 ,891 .72 . 13 We do have somebody from accounting here who 14 can verify the accuracy of those documents and then 15 also indicate that as of today, the new number would be 16 $81 ,293 . 23 . + 17 The only grounds for appeal raised by the 18 Appellant, we got a letter. And it' s Attachment E to 19 Exhibit H, which you have. And basically, they have 20 raised in the letter two basic arguments . The first 21 one is that the company' s not responsible for any of 22 these violations because they had an employee named r 23 Larry Brewer who was doing this . Nobody else knew 24 about it. 25 Again, it was a hard-plumbed line that ran 6 I outside the building. There was a lot of time and 2 expense that went into putting in this bypass line, and 3 it' s -- there' s just no logical basis for arguing that 4 nobody else had any knowledge of this . " 5 In addition, there was a declaration from 6 Larry Brewer, and it' s Attachment A to Exhibit H. And 7 in the declaration, he says under oath that as long as '•' 8 he' s been employed there, that' s what they have been 9 doing. And that was done under the supervision of the 10 president of the company. And that all the employees 11 were encouraged to make sure that anything that was 12 going to be questionable with regard to its limits was 13 to bypass the sampling area and make sure it went 14 directly into the sewer line. 15 So on one hand, we have the declaration of 16 Mr. Brewer. On the other hand, all we have is the 17 unsigned appeal, which raises the issue about who ' s 18 going to be responsible. 19 Finally, if you look at Exhibit -- I 'm sorry, 20 Attachment B to Exhibit H, there is the signature of 21 Rusty Hawkins , who' s the president of the organization, 22 where he is basically putting Larry Brewer in the 23 position of their manager and acting on behalf of the 24 organization. So to the extent his argument is, "He 25 was an employee and we' re not responsible, " his own 7 v I signature made that employee the responsible employee 2 for making sure that they're in compliance. 3 With regard to the user fees, we' ll just ask 4 our representative from accounting to come up and, very 5 briefly, confirm the accuracy of the numbers . 6 And they' re going to need to put you under 7 oath. 8 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Can I have her being sworn in by 9 the court reporter. 10 11 ANGELA BRANDT, 12 called as a witness on behalf of the OCSD, 13 and having been duly sworn by the 14 Certified Shorthand Reporter, was examined 15 and testified as follows : 16 17 EXAMINATION 18 19 BY MR. FARRINGTON: 20 Q. Can you please state your full name for the 21 record. 22 A. Angela Brandt, B-R-A-N-D-T. 23 Q. What' s your position here with the District? 24 A. Accounting supervisor. 25 Q. At my request, did you have a chance to review - 8 1 the accounting records with regard to the Hawk 2 Industrial Uniform? 3 A. Yes , I did. I pulled the -- his current 4 account balances, to see what they are, and they do 5 match what Mr. Farrington referenced, $81 ,293 . 23. 6 That includes his quarterly user charges, 7 along with finance charges that he receives on a 8 monthly basis and 10 percent penalties that he receives 9 when he doesn' t pay. 10 And he has only made two payments . He made 11 his appeal -- he paid for the appeal , $400, that fee, 12 and he did pay to have his permit renewed, which he has 13 to have to have that permit current. However, he has 14 not made any attempt to pay any of his user fees . 15 Q. When was the last time he made any payment? 16 A. Last one was -- he paid his renewal fee 17 July loth of 2006, but the last time he made a payment 18 towards the user fee was August 1st, 2005. 19 So he' s contacted on a monthly basis, received ,r 20 statements, phone calls, along with all phone calls 21 from accounting and then also receives phone calls from 22 Source Control . r 23 MR. FARRINGTON: I have no further questions . 24 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Obviously, the Permittee has no 25 presentation, since he' s not here . 9 v I Are there any questions by the Steering 2 Committee? 3 MR. LUEBBEN: The question is a clarification. 4 You said that Exhibit E, it was unsigned. +� 5 Looks like it is signed on page 2 . 6 MR. CRANDALL: It' s not signed under penalty of 7 perjury. 8 MR. FARRINGTON: Yeah. And thank you for the 9 correction. It is signed. It' s not under penalty of 10 perjury. And it, frankly, wasn' t presented in the 11 underlying action. It wasn't presented here at the 12 time we were presenting evidence. And, actually, under 13 the rules, they' re required to be here in order to 14 answer any questions, present any evidence they may 15 have. And, technically, this document says, "I want an 16 appeal, " and then there' s a procedure for them to bring ,. 17 additional evidence in into question. At this point, 18 none of that' s been done. 19 MR. CRANDALL: Okay. My question to the General s 20 Manager today was Mr. Brewer' s declaration, it was 21 dated October 24, 2006. He indicated that he was first 22 employed with the Hawk Industrial on March 3rd, 4th, 23 198 and had worked for him for nine years. 24 My math shows that' s in 2007 , which caused me 25 a little bit of angst when I found out timely. r 10 d 1 However, it' s been clarified for me now. In fact, 2 we've made fox the record -- 3 MR. RUTH: My understanding, he' s not currently 4 employed. He has his own business at this time. s 5 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Any other questions from the 6 Board? 7 Any final statements by the staff? s MR. FARRINGTON: You know, the only thing that I 9 wanted to add to the record, is there' s two additional 10 exhibits . One is Exhibit I , which is notice of ,r 11 tonight' s hearing. I want to make sure it' s part of 12 the record. 13 And then Exhibit J is actually a transcript of 14 the hearing that occurred before, when they didn' t 15 show. With those two additions -- 16 CHAIR FERRYMAN: So he' s been duly notified, and 17 there's no reason for him not to be here other than he is chose not to show? 19 MR. FARRINGTON: No. And to show that he +' 20 acknowledged he was notified, he did send in the 21 request for the appeal . So he understood this process 22 was starting. v 23 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Has anyone prepared a proposed 24 decision and findings for the Steering Committee to 25 consider? 11 1 MR. FARRINGTON: I do have a proposed decision as 2 well. 3 CHAIR FERRYMAN: While Mahin' s distributing this 4 material, we're just going to go ahead, take a 5 five-minute break and, you know, digest this 6 information, and then we' ll come back and make our 7 decision. S MR. ANDERSON: During that break, are we off the 9 record? 10 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Yes. 11 (Recess taken. ) 12 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Back on the record. 13 While we're waiting for him, is there any 14 discussion on what we reviewed? Any questions? 15 MS. GREEN: Doug and I did find out we really are 16 on the same page -- 17 MR. DAVERT: Mr. Chairman, I think you had proposed 18 to the Steering Committee regarding the appeal of Hawk 19 Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins , and I would move 'd 20 that we adopt the proposed findings and decision as 21 written. I think it' s very complete. I think it' s an 22 accurate reflection of the record thus far and an 23 accurate or an appropriate response to everything 24 that' s been presented here today. 25 So that would be my motion. 12 I MR. LUEBBEN: I would second that. 2 MR. CRANDALL: Can we also tack on whatever 3 attorney fees and costs we have? 4 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Well , we' ll get to that after. 5 I don' t think -- 6 MR. DAVERT: The issue before us is whether we 7 sustain the General Manager' s action. That' s, 8 essentially, what this is. 9 CHAIR FERRYMAN: I think what remedies we' ll go 10 after, we' ll discuss those after we take this motion, 11 consider this motion. 12 Any other discussion? Any objection? 13 MR. LUEBBEN: Want to voice-vote on this? 14 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Yeah, maybe we ought to do a voice 15 vote. 16 Gail? 17 MS. GARRETT: Cathy Green? is MS . GREEN: Aye. 19 MS . GARRETT: Phil Luebben? 20 MR. LUEBBEN: Yes. 21 MS. GARRETT : Larry Crandall? 22 MR. CRANDALL: Yes . 23 MS. GARRETT: Steve Anderson? 24 MR. ANDERSON: (No audible response. ) 25 MS . GARRETT: Mike Waldman? 13 .r 1 MR. WALDMAN: Yes. 2 MS . GARRETT: Doug Davert? 3 MR. DAVERT: Yes . 4 MS. GARRETT: Mr. Ferryman? 5 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Yes. 6 Okay. Motion carries . 7 We' ll give Steve a chance to throw his hat in 8 the ring here. 9 MR. DAVERT: He didn' t get a motion. 10 CHAIR FERRYMAN: Now, as far as remedies go -- it MR. DAVERT: Hold on a second. 12 Does that conclude our proceeding? 13 MR. ANDRUS: Yes, it does . 14 The hearing is closed. 15 MR. DAVERT: So we 're off the record? 16 MR. ANDRUS : Right. 17 MR. DAVERT: Thank you. 18 (The proceedings concluded at 6 : 10 p.m. ) 19 *** 20 21 22 23 24 25 d 14 1 2 REPORTER' S CERTIFICATE 3 4 I , Deborah L. Chadwick, a Certified Shorthand 5 Reporter of the State of California with principal 6 office in the County of Orange, do hereby certify that 7 the foregoing proceeding was written by me in Stenotype 8 and transcribed into typewriting and that the foregoing 9 is a true and correct copy of my shorthand notes 10 thereof. 11 lz �`/®�%�/ e ors Ch&dwwick 13 Certificate No. 4146 14 15 16 DatedfEB 0 2 2007 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 15 .r ATTORNEY'S NOTES PAGE LINE # NOTES d v e v r r Exhibit"I" ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT December 21, 2006 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL .b.,": (7141962 2411 Rusty Hawkins, President ran: Hawk Industrial Uniform 1714)9'20358 3001 E. La Palma Avenue Anaheim, CA 92806 „veiny aa4ron: Po Z.81n Subject: Administrative Complaint Appeal Hearing Notice wncun,W..,CA Re: Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No.2.1-079 9a)2eNt2r a44Ut Aa t.w: iry44 kNia W, CA This letter serves to notifyHawk Industrial Uniform,and Rust Hawkins,owner and resident nc92 Yn., 7,8 of Hawk Industrial Uniform, that pursuant to Section 618.A of the Orange County Sanitation District's(District) Wastewater Discharge Regulations(Ordinance), the Steering Committee M.,ab.r of the Board of Directors has granted a hearing based on the appeal filed on November 17, ny.nciea 2006. The hearing regarding this matter will be Conducted on January 24,2007 at 5:00 p.m., at the District's offices located at 108" Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley, California. Clcl.. In accordance with Section 618.D, after the hearing,the Steering Committee shall make a A.h.,, determination whether to uphold, modify, or reverse the decision,action,or determination made by the General Manager. The decision of the Steering Committee shall be set forth in writing within sixty-five(65)days after the close of the hearing and shall contain a finding of the facts found to be true,the determination of issues presented,and the Conclusions. The written decision and order of the Steering Committee shall be sent by certified mail to the appellant or its legal counsel/representative at the aPPellant's business address. rn 11••'k•• The order of the Steering Committee shall be final upon its adoption. In the event the SteeringCommittee fails to reverse or moth the General Manager's order, it shall be ly:mnn40G modify 9 deemed affirmed. tr.,,cn• �""'•'""' If you have any questions, please contact Mahin Talebi at 714 593-7410. 5 u/ann:a, SUM.,-Am r,,.sr Vn•p Parkk � nT �� -• 1, :. � - James D. Ruth .kyal ora.e. General Manager dry Distrito JR:MT:MH:fe H:ldepels%40,elizWd0W oIM93954.dac la,w, Ms: Certified Mail 7003 3110 0002 3655 4035 ee!oiacriccs Enclosures "p'Wk, Rna.l, cc: Brad Hogin, Esq. Ed Torres Mahin Talebi ' F ��t,. : s � 618. APPEALS TO THE STEERING COMMITTEE A. General Any user, permit applicant, or permittee adversely affected by a decision, action, or determination made by the General Manager may, prior to the date that the General Manager's order becomes final, file a written request for hearing before the Steering Committee of the Joint Boards of Directors accompanied by an appeal fee in the amount established by a separate resolution of the District's Board of Directors. The request for hearing shall set forth in detail all the issues in dispute for which the appellant seeks determination and all facts supporting appellant's request. No later than sixty (60) days after receipt of the request for hearing, the Steering Committee shall either set the matter for a hearing, or deny the request for a hearing. A hearing shall be held by the Steering Committee within sixty-five (65) days from the date of determination granting a hearing, unless a later date is agreed to by the appellant and the Steering Committee. If the matter is not heard within the required time, due to actions or inactions of the appellant, the General Manager's order shall be deemed final. B. Granting Request for Hearing The Steering Committee shall grant all requests for a hearing on appeals concerning permit suspension, revocation, or denial. Whether to grant or deny the request for a hearing on appeals of other decisions of the General Manager shall be within the sole discretion of the Steering Committee. C. Aopgal Fee Refund The appeal fee shall be refunded if the Steering Committee denies a hearing or reverses or modifies, in favor of the appellant, the order of the General Manager. The fee shall not be refunded if the Steering Committee denies the appeal. D. Written Determination After the hearing, the Steering Committee shall make a determination whether to uphold, modify, or reverse the decision, action, or determination made by the General Manager. The decision of the Steering Committee shall be set forth in writing within sixty- five (65) days after the close of the hearing and shall contain a finding of the 20sa 79 W7o facts found to be true, the determination of issues presented, and the conclusions. The written decision and order of the Steering Committee shall be sent by certified mail to the appellant or its legal counsel/representative at the appellant's business address. The order of the Steering Committee shall be final upon its adoption. In the event the Steering Committee fails to reverse or modify the General Manager's order, it shall be deemed affirmed. 618.1 Appeal of Charges and Fees Any user, permit applicant, or permittee affected by any decision, action, or determination by the District, relating to fiscal issues of the District in which the user, applicant, or permittee is located, including but not limited to the imposition and collection of fees, such as connection charges, sewer use charges, special purpose discharge use charges and Wastehauler fees, may request that the District reconsider imposition of such fees or charges. Following review of such a request, the District shall notify the user, permit applicant, or permittee by certified mail of the District's decision on the reconsideration request. Any user, permit applicant, or permittee adversely affected by the District's decision on the reconsideration request may file an appeal which shall be heard by the Board of Directors of the District in which the appellant's property is located. The notice of appeal must be received by the District within thirty (30)days of the mailing of the District's decision on the reconsideration request. Notwithstanding the foregoing, appeals of non-compliance sampling fees shall be made pursuant to the appeal procedures set forth in Sections 617 and 618. 619. PAYMENT OF CHARGES A. Except as otherwise provided, all fees, charges and penalties established by this Ordinance are due and payable upon receipt of notice thereof. All such amounts are delinquent if unpaid forty-five (45) days after date of invoice. B. Any charge that becomes delinquent shall have added to it a penalty in accordance with the following: 1. Forty-six (46) days after date of invoice, a basic penalty of ten percent (10%) of the base invoice amount, not to exceed a maximum of$1,000.00; and 2090-= W 701 80 Exhibit "J" TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING RE ADNHNISTRATPJE COMPLAINT- 10/24/06 ' 1 1 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA-TUESDAY.OCfOBER 24.20 2 2 10:04 A.M. TSt�ee 6 NAVI( INDUSTRIALIIINF�e�m IN RE 3 G9290a RANKING, PRESIDENT 4 MR.HOGIN: I'm going to Stan out with ebrief 5 1 5 presentation by the Sudwbn District,and I'll be E 6 prepared to answer any questions that the hearing 6 INDUSTRIAL NO. DI�f�ARGE 7 officer would like to investigate. 7 21 e 8 This hearing corcems an industrial laundry 9 9 called Hawk Industrial Laundry. They launder uniforms, 10 10 shop rags, shop cloths,and other miscellarres ou ppppNN vTT p ¢�pppp1 cG eE 11 materials staft as dust mops and floor mats. 11 12 T XI�StRITNEX WMP RI MT 12 Just a little bit of a background on the 13 13 history of enforcement anions the District his taken 14 14 against Hawk before we gct to the violations which give 5 15 rise to this proceeding. 1 15 16 In M Hawk had a number of violations 7 relating to discharge of TTO,total toxic organics,and 17 Date ertd time: Tuesday. Oc[oher 24, 2006, 10:04 A.M. 1 18 Location: 10544 Ellis A IB oil and grease,and thou violations gave rise to two 19 Fountain Valley, aLifornte 19 different compliance orders in 2004;one issued in 20 20 January and one issued in July of that year. 21 21 Ultimately—and the limit set forth in the District's 22 22 wastewater discharge ordinance is .59 pans per million 23 23 on the TTO And 100 pans per million for oil and grease. w 24 Reporter: 24 The cnpliaMe issues in 2004 resulted in an 25 Perot:?:Cate M6.Cg81R4ytOR 25 order from the District requiring Hawk to install a 3 1 Transcript of Neari n9 re Administrative I pretreatment system. Hawk never complied with that 2 Caoplaints re Hawk IrnAatrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins, 2 order and to this day has not complied with that order. 3 Pras ident, taken before Pamela Cotten, Certified 3 The District in the fall of that year received alever 4 Shorthand Reporter, Certificate No. 4497, cmmencio; at 4 which essentially set fond a number of excuses relating 5 10:04 A.M., Tuesday, October 24, 2DD6, at the Orange 5 to electrical city requirements and an on,but the 6 County Sanitation Districts, located at 10844 Ellis 6bottom lire:is Hawk never complied with the enforcement 7 Avenue, Board Room, Fountain Valley, California. 7 order. 8 a In March of this year.March INh.2006,the 9 APPEARANCES: 9 District impactors went out and took a look at the 10 PAUL C. MARTYR NeaCi n9 Of f is r 10 situation at Hawk,and what They found was that there Cmmt,��_S� mtCaCtl on Districts o? 11 (pia2j�ti�,I ER. 2902 11 was a deliberate end intentional bypass system instilled 12 12 that allowed the discharge from The laundering of oily ypppRttFF S LIN g SMART 13 R Pro�f ¢giore Corpp99ratsoonn 13 rags and shop=serials in bypass the designated ; �""@@$$¢�� ET R. XODIN, EN. 14 70�t5outhg arker,Strpa[ � Id sampling point order the Hawk permit. 7Tere were 15 0 e a er.S 92966 15 subsequent sampling violations discovered after the (JI41 559- 16 16 bypass system was severed in May of this year. M5. ce Centre TALtre B 17 55ounce contro stager 17 We have a number of the inspectors that were Orange Casty Sanitation District 18 16 present on the site. Mr. Dave Francis is here along 19 OrirgeDContyy SBRANanitation District 19 with his inspection team. Martin Hall with the Source 20 WRCeLCEEIHI"ntro Insor 11 20 Control Division was also present at the 2006 inspection 21 Drama Casty Sani aatftion District 21 in March of 2006. 22 DAVE FRANCIS nspec 22 This figure—and I know this figure is a 23 [range camioylSan, aactian District 23 little hard to read on this slide,but The figure is 24 MARTIN NOLL 24 reproduced in the Administrative Complain,and this 25 Orange Sanitation District 25 fi n9 County y gore, in a nutshell,describes how the system was 2 4 TORNELL & COTTEN PROFESSIONAL COURT REPORTERS (714) _ f TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING RE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT - 10/24/06 1 bypassed. You can see that the dotted line reflects the 1 That's a separate reason why the bypass system was 2 lawful permitted waste stream as it is supposed to 2 unlawful because, of course,the reports mowing full 3 receive under the permit. The waste stream originates 3 compliance with the discharge were false because the 4 here in the laundry facilities,ravels through here to 4 discharge was actually bypassed from the designated 5 a designated sampling point,and men and only men 5 sampling point. 6 after pawing through the designated sampling point is 6 The bypass was unlawful for a third ground, 7 it discharged into the manhole. The unlawful bypass 7 that any actions to render monitoring inaccurate me 8 system is repmaumed by this solid line,and here you 8 prohibited. Again,that is a condition of the Hawk 9 have the Tawdry machine for the mop towels and mop 9 permit found in Section ID.E. 10 rags,and this discharge goes straight through here. It 10 Those are three different grounds why the I t does not go through the sampling point and instead goes I I bypass was unlawful. It is also clear given the facts 12 direct to the manhole. 12 the bypass allowed the unlawful discharge of 13 I've just got some pictures to walk you through 13 contaminants in violation of the District's ordinance, 14 so you can see exactly how this works. This is the 14 and we an see that because in 2005,before the bypass 15 designated sampling point which is,again,represented 15 system was discovered,the facility achieved a 97% 16 on the chart right here. 16 compliance in its sampling procedures. After the bypass 17 This is where the bypass system begins in the 17 system was discovered and it was put out of operation, Is collection sump. 18 the District come back in May of this year and found SD% 19 This is a picure from the day that it was 19 noncompliance—50%compliance or 50%noncompliance. !0 discovered. You an see how it is filled with oil and 20 So you an see that it is clear in 2005 while the bypass !1 grease. 21 system was operating,clearly there was that substantial !2 This is the pipe coming out of the collection 22 discharge of comaminmts in violation of the District's !3 sump. 23 ordinance. !4 This is the bypass pipe as it exits the 24 In May of this year in that subsequent round of 15 building. It rum along above ground for the 25 sampling, the District found five TTO violations that 5 7 1 building--alongside the building,and then it enters I were up to 1862%over the .58 parts per million limit 2 underground, which is this portion right here. This is 2 and two oil and grease violations up to 211% over the 3 a close-up of the stand pipe where the bypass pipe 3 limits. All of them violations are considered major 4 ethers underground. 4 violations under the District's ordinance. 5 What the inspectors did to verify that the 5 So the District is seeking Once types of 5 system was in fact bypassed in the designated sampling 6 remedies for these violations. The first is a 30-day 7 point was to inject dye in the stand point. This is the 7 suspension. A suspension is warranted under the 3 point at which the pipe enters underground,so there is 8 District ordinance for my violation of permit 7 no way to visually determine whom it is going. They 9 conditions and my actions that are taken to render 0 inject a dye into the stand pipe to see where the dye 10 monitoring inaccurate. So clearly those grounds are met I would come out. What they found,as you an see in this 11 hue. 2 picture here,is the dye came out in the manhole. The 12 The District is also seeking monetary penalties 3 dye did not appear at the designated sampling point. So 13 in the amount of 55,000 for each and every compliance 4 it was very clear that them was an intentional system 14 violation,which totals eight different—eight 5 that had been constructed and was operating for some 15 separate violations in May of 2006 and then one going 6 time than was bypassing the designated sampling point. 16 back to fall of last year. 7 Tice bypass simply is unlawful. The bypass is 17 And,finally,the District is owed user fees 8 prohibited by the District's wastewater discharge op. 18 and finance charges for past invoices which haven't hem 9 ordinance,expressly prohibited in Section 501.4.A. 19 paid. 3 That prohibition is aim a condition of the Hawk permit 20 1 do have an adjusted amount for the hearing 1 in Section II.A.2. So the bypass violates both the 21 offerer which is different from what's in the 2 ordinance in general and the specific permit that was 22 Complaint. It has been adjusted simply as pm of the 3 issued to Hawk. 23 Disuia's routine accounting. The District requires 1 There was aim a requirement in the permit that 24 quarterly payments based an estimated flow. Once the 5 a permiues shall not make false statements in reports. 25 actual flow numbers come in, the District adjusts the 6 8 ages 5-8 TORNELL & COTTEN PROFESSIONAL COURT REPORTERS (714) 543-1600 TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING RE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT - 10/24/06 1 amount. So the actual amount past due M of today is 1 outstanding balance or agree to a payment schedule? 2 S71,891.72. 2 Would that be amenable to the Districts.a secured 3 So in sum,the bypass system and the subsequent 3 payment schedule? 4 sampling violations represent a clear and egregious 4 MR. HOGIN: I think given the history of 5 violation of the District's wastewater discharge 5 nonpayment.I would have to say Nat the payment 6 ordinance. 6 schedule would not be acceptable at this time to the 7 I'll also add that I presented the hearing 7 District, and I would request that the suspension be in 8 officer with a declaration from Mr. Zany Bocher,who 8 effect until such time ss the outstanding balance is 9 was a production manager at Hawk from 1998 until very 9 paid in full. 10 recently,and in the declaration Mr. Becher confirmed 10 MS.TALEBI: And the system is installed to ensure 11 that the bypass system was installed intentionally by 11 compliance. 12 Mr. Hawkins as a way to get around the District's 12 MR. HOGIN: And the treatment system that was 13 sampling requirements. 13 ordered some time ago is installed. 14 That concludes my presentation,and 1 would be 14 HEARING OFFICER MARTYN: 1 assume,also,the 15 happy to answer any questions that the hearing officer 15 removal of the bypass line. 16 may have.and in addition we have District staff here 16 MR. HOGIN: The bypass line has already been 17 available to answer any questions. 17 removed,an that's not an issue. 18 HEARING OFFICER MARTYN: Okay. 1 have no questions 18 HEARING OFFICER MARTYN: I concur with those 19 at this time. 19 recommendations. 1 third that's appropriate,again, 20 Is there a representative from Hawk Industries. 20 considering the severity of the violation. 21 or is there any presenation? 21 MR.HOGIN: I believe that—unless the hearing 22 MS.TALEBI: They didn't stow up. No-shows. 22 officer has anything funher, I think that concludes the 23 HEARING OFFICER MARTYN: Okay. It appears pretty 23 proceeding. 24 straightforward from my reviewing of the Administrative 24 HEARING OFFICER MARTYN: No. I think it is fairly 25 Complaint and the presentation today,the company was 25 obvious what has happened. 9 11 1 seriously remiss in several regards in terms of the 1 MS. TALEBI: Thank you. 2 bypass. in terms of the eight numerical violations that 2 MR. HOGIN: Thank you. 3 are referenced in the Complaint as well as their unpaid 3 (The proceeding was concluded in 10:16 A.M.) 4 financial obligations,and as 1 understand it is now 4 5 $71.891.27 rather than the$96,569.63? 5 6 MS.TALEBI: Yes. 6 7 HEARING OFFICER MARTYN: Okay. With that being the 7 8 case,I'll render a decision in favor of the Sanitation 8 9 Districts in lams of the$45.000 for the Complaint 9 10 together with the 71,991.72 for the balance of their 10 I I past due invoices,and the 30day suspension of the 11 12 permit to begin at a time established by the Sanitation 12 13 Districts. I guess I would suggest that it would 13 14 probably be rather sooner than later given the severity 14 15 of the violation. 15 16 If the Districts would prefer,I will render a 16 17 written decision at a subsequent doe. 17 18 MR. HOGIN: Mr. Hearing Officer,if I could just IB 19 recommend that the 30day suspension.the remedy thin is 19 20 requested is a 30day suspension as a minimum, and that 20 21 the suspension would continue until such time as Hawk 21 22 comes into compliance— 22 23 MS. TALEBI: Compliance and pay all the- 23 24 MR. HOGIN: —and pays die outstanding amount. 24 25 HEARING OFFICER MARTYN: That would be pay the 25 10 12 TORNELL & COTTEN PROFESSIONAL COURT REPORTERS (714) �4 -S�i�012 TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING RE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT - 10/24/06 r I z 3 4 5 REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE 6 7 1.Pamela Cotten, a Certified Shonhand 8 Reponer and a Notary Public of the State of California 9 with principal office in die County of Orange do hereby 10 unify that the foregoing proceeding was written by me 11 in Stenotype and umscribed into typewriting and that 12 the foregoing is a true and correct copy of my shonlawal 13 notes themf. 14 Is 16 17 18 Dated: 19 !0 '1 '2 3 !4 :s 13 ages 13-16 TORNELL & COTTEN PROFESSIONAL COURT REPORTERS (714) 543-1600 STEERING COMMITTEE Meennpoate To ed.or M. 2 2a/a7 AGENDA REPORT rem (b) rm nmwe ](b1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Ed Torres, Director of Technical Services SUBJECT: Transcript of Proceedings of Hawk Industrial Uniform Hearing Appeal GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File Transcript of Proceedings of the Hawk Industrial Uniform appeal hearing before the Steering Committee held on January 24,2007. SUMMARY An appeal hearing was held on January 24,2007 in regards to appellants Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins'(collectively"Hawk")appeal to the Steering Committee of the Board of Directors of the November 2, 2006 decision of the District's General Manager,James D. Ruth, imposing: 1)an administrative penalty in the amount of$45,000.00; 2) Hawk be required to pay the past due user charges, annual invoices,penalties and finance charges in the amount of$71,891.72; and 3)Hawk's Wastewater Discharge Permit Number 2-1-079 is to be suspended for a period of not less than thirty(30)days. At the January 24, 2007, the Steering Committee endorsed the General Manager's decision and order of November 2,2006. The District has received a certified copy of the Court Reporter's Transcript of Proceedings of the January 24, 2007 hearing and therefore,the General Counsel representing staff recommends that the Steering Committee receive and file the report PRIOR COMMITTEEJBOARD ACTIONS Steering Committee appeal hearing,January 24, 2007. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION On January 29,2007,the District mailed the Steering Committee's decision to Hawk via certified mail. On February 2,2D07, District staff also hand-delivered a copy of the decision directly to Rusty Hawkins. After consultation with legal counsel, Source Control Division physically terminated Hawk's industrial discharge on February 7,2007. Staff continues to monitor the sewer discharges downstream of Hawk's facility and their city water meter for evidence of unauthorized discharge of industrial wastewater. Preliminary findings indicate that Hawk continues to use a volume of water which would not easily be disposed of other than to the sewer. A thorough investigation of possible altemative discharge points within the plant, including toilets, sinks, and the collection sump, is scheduled for late February 2007. ram w.av-�oa� nwmmgoWN eereea.o1 Page 1 MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, February 28, 2007, at 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 5:00 p.m., In the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present,as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: STAFF PRESENT: Jim Fenyman, Chair Jim Ruth, General Manager Doug Davert,Vice Chair Bob Ghirelli,Assistant General Manager Mark Waldman,Administration Committee Nick Arhomes, Director of Operations and Chair Maintenance Larry Crandall, Operations Committee Chair Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering Steve Anderson Ed Torres, Director of Technical Services Cathy Green Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Phil Luebben Administrative Services Michael Gold, Legislative Affairs Liaison DIRECTORS ABSENT Tod Haynes, Engineering Manager Layne Baroldi, Legal & Reg Affairs Liaison OTHERS PRESENT: Juanita Skillman, Records Management Bradley R. Hogin, General Counsel Specialist Joe Forbath, Counsel Norbert Gaia, IT Analyst Reed Royalty, OC Tax Association Gail Garrett, Committee Secretary Jackie Nutting,Associated Builders Contracts HE Mike Holton, Helix Electric Inc. THEEMOF ��OF Heather Dion, Townsend Public Affairs 0 STa Chris Townsend,Townsend Public Affairs (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM MAR 28 2007 No appointment was necessary. BW. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Public comments were made by Jackie Nutting from Associated Builders Contracts; Mike Holton of Helix Electric; and Reed Royalty of the Orange County Tax Association with reference to the proposed designibuild legislation. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Ferryman reported that he, General Manager Ruth and staff met with Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez on February 20 to present a request for federal funds for the District's secondary treatment upgrade. Congresswoman Sanchez agreed to take the lead in the House on this request. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 February 28,2007 Mr. Ferryman and staff will attend the CASA conference in Washington DC March 11-14 to meet with Orange County delegates re federal funding requests. A report will be provided to the Board at the next meeting. Mr. Fanyrnan and staff will meet with SAWPA and County executive staff on March 8 to discuss the development of a financial plan to fund the SARI line relocation. Mr. Ruth advised that the Santa Ana Water Quality Control Board (SCCWQCB)intends to issue a cease and desist order against OCSD and SAWPA for failure to protect the SARI line. Chair Ferryman announced the upcoming committee meetings for March. (5) REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER Mr. Jim Ruth reported on the month's status and achievements:the upgraded Annual Report; Succession Plan; Engineering's new Fast Track Team; ongoing labor negotiations;the review schedule for the CIP budget. The IT assessment has been completed and organizational options are being considered. Jim Herberg gave an update on the 10-year Collection System Improvement Plan EIR, which will be finalized in July 2007. He informed that LAFCO has hired a contractor to prepare a Municipal Service Review for OCSD which should address local sewer responsibilities in unincorporated areas of the County. Bob Ghirelli provided an update on the progress of the SARI line technical meetings. He informed that Herb Nakasone will retire in March— Ignacio Ochoa will be the new engineer in charge for the County. (6) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Brad Hogin provided an update on the Hawk Industrial Uniform matter. He and staff have reviewed a letter from Kem County's General Counsel, objecting to the Board's approval of the Addendum to Final Program EIR for the 1999 Strategic Plan, and have concluded it does not raise any significant issues. He reported that staff recommends moving forward with Board Item No. 8(c)on tonight's agenda. (7) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve minutes of the January 24, 2007 Steering Committee meeting. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file transcript of proceedings of the Hawk Industrial Uniform appeal hearing before the Steering Committee held on January 24, 2007 END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 February 28, 2007 8) ACTION ITEMS Michael Gold provided an update on the Sanitation District's Design-Build bill SB 645 authored by Senator Lou Correa and Assembly Member Van Tran. He introduced Sanitation District lobbyists Heather Dion and Chris Townsend who provided reports on Prop 84 and 1 E bond measures. Townsend&Associates staff is working to expand the definition of eligible recycled water projects to include sanitation districts—this could allow access to an additional $90 million for beach areas. A written report will be provided next month. After brief discussion by Committee members, it was: a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend that Steering Committee (1) reaffirm its sponsorship and support of design-build legislation; and (2)direct staff to provide regular updates to the Steering Committee regarding Design Build legislation. (9) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in March were reviewed. b. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to the Board at the February 28, 2007 meeting were reviewed. Item 8(b)was pulled by staff. (10) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING Nick Arhontes, Director of Operations and Maintenance,to provide a report on the Huntington Beach Lift Station. He informed that, to date, the City of Huntington Beach staff and general counsel have not signed and returned the MOU. (12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, March 28,2007 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, March 28, 2007 at 7 p.m. Director Larry Crandall announced that, due to the July Fourth holiday,the Operations Committee will meet on Thursday,July 12, 2007. (14) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:05 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957, or 54957.6 to discuss two matters. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 February 28, 2007 with the Clerk of the Board. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Steering Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2,and are maintained by the Clerk of the Board in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the recommended actions will be publicly reported at the time the approved actions become final. At 6:25 p.m.,the Committee reconvened in regular session. (15) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m. Submitted by: � Gail Garrett Steering Committee Secretary �dro..n^m�*�.•.wwns amrmseumruawenovam sc ra,e..oan.aec r r r d r r EXHEBIT H DOCUMENTATION PERTAINING TO HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM APPEAL HEARING r January 24, 2007 r r r r r r r r ATTACHMENT A Declaration of Larry Booher October 24, 2006 10/24/2006 08 41 FAx I0 002/003 1 DECLARATION OF LARRY BOOHER 2 I, Larry Booher, declare: 3 1. 1 have personal knowledge of the following facts and d called as a witness, 1 4 could and would testify competently as follows. 5 2. 1 was an employee of Hawk Industrial Uniform ('Hawk Industrial"), located at 6 1120 N. Armando Street,Anaheim. California for approximately nine(9) years. 7 3, Rusty Hawkins, as President and owner of Hawk Industrial, is responsible for 8 the operations and industrial wastewater discharge activities at Hawk Industrial Uniform. 9 4. On or about March 31, 1998, Mr. Hawkins hired me as a Production Manager. 10 My responsibilities as a Production Manager Included overseeing all aspects of the d 11 industrial laundry, including calculating time cards for payroll, employee scheduling, 12 operation, maintenance and upkeep of the industrial washers and dryers and related F 13 infrastructure, including the wastewater treatment clarifiers, and wastewater testing and s 5 pp 14 reporting. I reported directly to Mr. Hawkins. 5 �9 15 5. Hawk Industrial is an industrial laundry that rents and washes soiled uniforms, 16 floor mats, dust mops, gloves, and shop towels, print towels, and oil laden towels. Hawk W Industrial Urdorm's wastewater-generating operations include wastewater from the 1B washing, dyeing, and rinsing processes. In addition to wastewater from laundering and 19 dyeing operations, the facility discharges brine from the water-softening system through a .. 20 three-stage underground clarifier. 21 6. Since my employment commenced in March, 199B, Hawk Industrial has been ,., 22 discharging wastewater from the laundering and dyeing operations directly into a manhole; 23 located on the property. Wastewater generated from the washing machines travels via a — 24 trench to a sump. A submersible pump in the sump pumped this wastewater through a 25 subterranean pipe, which re-emerged underneath, and was hidden by, a sink on the north 26 wall of the facility. The pipe subsequently penetrated the wall and ran alongside the 27 building, where it discharged to a standpipe. The standpipe discharged directly to a 28 manhole on the property, entirely bypassing the underground clarifier and the designated 1 maeo, DECLARATION OF LARRY BOOHER 10/24/2006 08:41 FAX —'-- IQ1003/003 W 1 sample point. 2 7. Mr. Hawkins was at all times during my employment aware that wastewater 3 generated from the laundering operation was being directly discharged into the manhole 4 and directed that these pipelines be installed at the locations described in paragraph 6. 5 8. At the direction of Mr. Hawkins, Hawk Industrial employees regularly cleaned 6 out two sump pits that were the initial discharge points for the wastewater flows. These pits o, 7 routinely filled with grease, oil, sludge and other byproducts from the industrial wastewater, 8 In accordance with routing cleaning practices established by Mr. Hawkins. Hawk Industrial 9 employees would shovel the wastewater byproducts into 55 gallon drums and dump the 10 byproducts into the manhole located on the property. 11 9. 1 was also responsible for overseeing the wastewater testing and reporting for 12 Hawk Industrial pursuant to the terms of the and routinely filed reports consistent with the c 13 direction provided by Mr. Hawkins. In general, the wastewater that was collected from the i 'g:xASS� 14 sampling point was routinely diluted with water to obtain a favorable result and to ensure r 5 $ 15 compliance with the terms of the wastewater discharge permit. 16 1 declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that 17 the foregoing is true and correct. � 18 Executed on October A,/ 2006, Santa Ana, California. 19 s 20 ER 21 w 22 23 24 25 26 27 .. 28 2 DECLARATION OF LARRY BOOHER 5nu01 r r y r r r ATTACHMENT B Authorization for Designated Signatory February 25, 2004 r r r r r r r Sent BY: 0CSD1 rle 952 6911 ! ro unr ve ® Submit rle form only If the Responsible Officer wants to doing e a Signatory. Authorization for Designated Signatory This is to authorize ills individual whose name and(ilia appear below, Roo .4,ew? w/Lld'/IiyC pYgw•e5M Yee.M IFlIwe RM grrD.y nor to be the designated individual responsible for wasiewalgr discharges who can be served with notices, end whom the Designated Signatory on my behalf for purposes of signing all reports This individual has the responsibility for the overall operation of the facility and/)r overall responsibility for compliance with all roguish"requirements Air this facility from which the wastewater discharge originates- 1 understand Ilia( if, in fire future, this inmmlaflon is no longer correct. the District will be nolirred in wnfing to laminate designation of the above-nomad mdividual and to establish a new signatory. r ,y Name of Responsible nxf Signature Tale Date p✓ Q_� Company Name 'll`-' TU/ �- Permit No. s A ro•peruAb atllmr Is OMred n lolbwe: 1. Fq arppor•If•n: _ w .. Apntlent{•elq•ry.lr•u{gq,q Vkegre{Wanl MUaegp•rallon ncheree of ale glncqal{nims.lunch, q ale ONrN pesos e{rp ArlOrrre{Yrnbr pefew q eeelrbaellkare ernrlron Iq Itre eemonibn,or e. Tee manaperolomwmore megdagerwq,podGw,gaperalbn heab{emDleyap'nrefB Mae 25e peroens er eavary em{f agwtl{•W q egenmurea mn•drq iTh ration M{e{eneauaaq 1v80Ooe•rol.r wleorM to ores sec nls eu aeon n.gn.ega•ugwMaslM mwupern•uv.anrcn�mrrarpgaee Droa.xrrea r I iq mnmfenq ar{•M gavrieleneb.aaeMfalaaMwrq proerblq.reepedNelr. ® I accept file responarbddy for the overall operation of the facrl(v ond/u overall responsibility for compliance with aft regulatory requirements for this fwYiiy from which the wastewater discharge originates. 1 understand that d is my responsibility to keep the Responsible Opker informed at ali limes regarding all permit and enforceme�n(issues. Name of Designated Sign /Htda' 'e, /(/ linen Pwia Signature .a ® Title ++ N a< r ' d/+ Date-4ZLf/Dy All correspondence regarding as permit and enforcement Issues shall be sent to the Designated Signatory. It is the Designated Signatory's responsibility to keep the Responsible Officer informed at all times regarding all permit and enlorcament issues. The Responsible Officer remains legally responsible for all wastewater discharge to the sewer from this Inc""and forensurmg that he is duly Informed by the Designated Signatory. IN u..nA IAp6.lM H.MpA{bU190VlMWWLtlfaMhnrrRn.w...fv I}u4^.rad S.6^rra r toils1sec r r r r r r r ATTACHMENT C General Manager's Hearing Decision and Order November 2, 2006 r r 1 r 1 r r r r r r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r November 2, 2006 on.ns, Rusty Hawkins, President VIACERTIFIED MAIL n14)962-2411 Hawk Industrial Uniform Men 1714)9620 56 3001 E. La Palma Avenue anrw,ccad.e,n Anaheim, CA 92708 ,. .wn°arse. % 9a 6 6127 nB2 Ve°°' aA Subject: Administrative Complaint Hearin Decision and Order 92J2BaY Dk 1 P 9 Re: Hawk Industrial Uniform, Permit No. 2-1-079 19844 Elie A�.n.a Faunain Valley.G 92709-7019 This letter shall serve as notice to Rusty's Dust& Towel, Inc., dba Hawk Industrial Uniform, of the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) decision and order to Maness, uphold the enclosed recommended decision of the Administrative Hearing Officer, Agana s Paul Marlyn, in the administrative proceeding held on October 24, 2006. The car cities Hearing Officer has determined that grounds exist for the assessment of an administrative penalty in the amount of Forty-Five Thousand Dollars ($45,000.00) for Anahe'n' eight discharge violations and altering the monitoring data by bypassing the rl Bean.�k designated sample point; Seventy-One Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-One and G�aPBu 72/100 Dollars ($71,891.72) for user charges, annual invoices, penalties and Fountain Yaney Fwiayron finance charges due; and permit suspension for a minimum of thirty (30) days, and r Barden craw, until the amounts specified above are received, and the necessary pretreatment �°•`On BkInhe each equipment to reasonably assure compliance with all applicable effluent limits is La Habra installed and operational. La Pelr a r Los Ab to. Mawpert Beech Therefore, I have determined that Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins, and °fen•° Pa.... each of them, be assessed an administrative penalty in the amount of$45,000.00 sane An. and are required to pay user charges, annual invoices, penalties and finance Beat eaxn Stanton charges due in the amount of$71,891.72. Additionally, Hawk Industrial Uniform's r atin Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit Number 2-1-079 is suspended for a period Vnl.Pert of not less than thirty(30)days. The permit suspension shall continue thereafter until such time as the total amount of One Hundred Sixteen Thousand Eight ca.n.a cr 0r.o6. Hundred Ninety-One and 721100 Dollars ($116,891.72) is paid in full. The permit suspension shall also continue until the necessary pretreatment equipment to assure sanitary Districts compliance with all applicable effluent limits is installed and operational. Please be cnaw ea..a advised that Permit No. 2-1-079 is suspended effective November 18, 2006, and McWay Dry the $116,891.72 must be remitted to the District, and the pretreatment system water Distriacs installed and operational, by December 18, 2006, unless a timely appeal is filed. If irv,ne Ranch no timely appeal is filed, Hawk Industrial Uniform must cease and desist all wastewater discharges to the District's sewerage system on November 18, 2006. Section 604 of the District's Ordinance provides that any person aggrieved by this order may file a request for an appeal hearing with the Steering Committee pursuant to Section 618 of the Ordinance. If Hawk Industrial Uniform decides to file a request _ 1 Rusty Hawkins, Hawk Industrial Uniform November 2, 2006 Page 2 for an appeal, the District must receive the appeal hearing request within fifteen (15) days from this notification; therefore, the appeal request must by submitted no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 17, 2006. Please be advised that the provisions of Section 618 require that the request for a hearing shall set forth in detail all the issues in dispute for which you seek determination and all facts supporting your request. Furthermore, a written request for hearing must be accompanied by an appeal fee of$400.00. A copy of Section 618 is enclosed for your convenience. Hawk Industrial Uniform is reminded that its industrial wastewater discharge is expected to be in compliance with all limits at all times. Any discharge violations occurring after the issuance of this administrative complaint will be served under a separate complaint. If you have any questions, please call Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager, at (714)593-7410.q /2-zz _ James D. Ruth Interim General Manager JDR:MT:MH:fe H:NepOW%64mo1izondowa14i93e07.d= Certified Mail: 7003 3110 0002 3655 3557 Enclosure cc: Brad Hogin, Esq. Ed Torres Mahin Talebi Angela Brandt Kelly Christensen Martin Holl ses ( . ses COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY r 1955 Workman Mill Road, Whittim, CA 90601.1400 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 4998, Whittier, CA 90607-4998 JAMES F. STAHL Telephone: (562) 699-7411, FAX: (562) 699.5422 Chief Engineer and General Manager www.locsd.org CC. 1 1 1'f` October 30,2006 Mr.James Ruth Interim General Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts Flie Original ses On October 23,2006 an Administrative Compliant Hearing was held for Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins,President(Hawk)at the Sanitation Districts' (Districts)administrative office in Fountain Valley,California. In attendance for the Districts were Martin Talebi, Source Control se Manager,Martin Holl, and Dave Francis,together with several Source Control Staff and Bradley R. Hogin of Woodruff, Spradlin and Smart. The Hearing Officer was Paul Marlyn,Head of the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Industrial Waste Section. There were no representatives from Hawk. The proceedings were recorded by Pamela Cotter,a court reporter with Tomell&Cotton. This Administrative Complaint Hearing was scheduled under the procedures specified in the Districts' Resolution No. OCSD 98-14. The reason for this Administrative Complaint Hearing was Hawks failure to comply with the terms and conditions of their industrial wastewater discharge permit, namely bypassing industrial wastewater around prescribed monitory facilities,violating established effluent standards and nonpayment of user chargers. Testimony was provided that documented Hawk's installation of an illegal bypass line prior to March 16,2006. The construction of this bypass was further supported in the declaration of Larry Bucher,the former Production Manager at Hawk. The purpose of the bypass was determined to be the concealment of off-specification wastewater. Hawk was subject to wastewater effluent limits for total toxic organics(TTOs)and oil and grease. The limit for TTOs was 0.58 mg/I; the limit for oil and grease was 200 mg/l. There were eight documented instances since October 2005 that these limits were exceeded. Unpaid user charges,together with penalty and finance charges currently amount to a$71,891.72 balance owed by Hawk. Upon conclusion of the Districts' presentation of the facts and the failure of Hawk to present any defense or explanation, it is the recommendation of the Hearing Officer that monetary penalties in the amount of$45,000(for the eight numerical effluent violations and the operation of the bypass line)and $71,891.72 in unpaid user charges be assessed against Hawk. Moreover,that Hawk be subject to a 30- day suspension of their industrial wastewater discharge permit and their ability to discharge wastewater to the Districts'sewerage system, at a time to be determined by the Districts' General Manager. It is also recommended that if Hawk elects to resume discharging wastewater to the sewerage system that they pay in full the$116,891.72 assessment and install,to the satisfaction of the Districts' General Manager,the necessary pretreatment equipment to reasonably assure compliance with all applicable effluent limits. Paul Martyn Hearing Officer PCM:dfd #708705 r r r r r ATTACHMENT D r r Hawk Industrial Uniform Administrative Complaint and Notice r September 12, 2006 r r r r r r r r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT September 12, 2006 d (714)962'2411 Rusty Hawkins, President "" l71919620966 Hawk Industrial Uniform d ,..0....9...m 1120 N. Armando Street mm9n..94rc..: Anaheim, CA 92806 Pa a.9127 °" 92]29-812] I p Ve c` Subject: Administrative Complaint and Hearing Notice 92 Re: Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-1-079 .. 10644 ells Awnue Pounuin Nally,M 92]09]O1B This letter serves to notify Hawk Industrial Uniform, and Rusty Hawkins, owner M,.., and president of Hawk Industrial Uniform and the person responsible for assuring compliance with the provisions of Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-1-079, of the enclosed Administrative Complaint issued to Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins pursuant to the authority of California a 9n.m Government Code Sections 54739-54740.6 at. seq., the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Section 1251 at. seq.), and Section 615.1) of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance) of the Orange County Sanitation District (District). A P"Iler.9n hearing regarding this matter will be conducted on October 24, 2006 at 10:00 a.m., at the District's offices located at 10844 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley, Hunun9wn ae.cn aN California. L. a L. Pa". elme Le. Al... As described in the enclosed Administrative Complaint, District staff eWP° BBeL" recommends that Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins, jointly and a4nae ee=4^�e severally, be assessed a total administrative penalty in the amount of Forty- Ss.a . Five Thousand Dollars ($45,000.00)for eight discharge violations that ^m^ occurred between October 25, 2005 and July 10, 2006, and avoiding rusun Ylle Perk representative sampling of its discharge and thus altering the monitoring data, °De L.dc in violation of its Permit No. 2-1-079 and the District's Ordinance. The °• c..ner .r o..... Complaint also seeks to collect the sum of Ninety-Six Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Nine 63/100 Dollars ($96,569.63), the past due user charges, S.M.., Dino.. annual invoices, penalties and finance charges owed to the District. rq . Mes. Furthermore, the Complaint also recommends the suspension of Hawk Mdwey C. Industrial Uniform's Permit No. 2-1-079 for a minimum of thirty (30) days, w..., or...i.c. and until the total amount of One Hundred Forty-One Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Nine 631100 Dollars ($141,569.63) is received, and until Hawk Industrial Uniform demonstrates compliance with all requirements described in the complaint. Rusty Hawkins, President Page 2 September 12, 2006 At the hearing, Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins will have an opportunity to respond to the allegations set forth in the Administrative Complaint in accordance with the District's Rules of Procedure, enclosed herewith. Please note that any documentation to be submitted by Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins in opposition to the Administrative Complaint must be submitted to the District and filed with the Hearing Officer no later than eight (8) days before the hearing. The deadline for submittal will be 4:30 p.m. on October 15, 2006. If you have any questions, please contact Mahin Talebi at (714) 593-7410. James D. Ruth Interim General Manager JR:fe H:W eptM\640\elizondoW oIIQ93745.dm Enclosures cc: Brad Hogin, Esq. Ed Torres Mahin Talebi Dave Francis RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98-14 ADOPTING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PERMIT SUSPENSION, PERMIT REVOCATION, ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL PENALTIES, APPEALS, AND OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE GENERAL MANAGER ® PURSUANT TO DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-01, ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PERMIT SUSPENSION, PERMIT REVOCATION, ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL PENALTIES, APPEALS AND OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE GENERAL MANAGER PURSUANT TO DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-01, ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS WHEREAS, the District has adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-01, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations; and, WHEREAS, said Ordinance No. OCSD-01, Article 6, establishes detailed enforcement provisions to insure compliance with all the rules and requirements for discharges to the District's system; and, WHEREAS, said Ordinance No. OCSD-01 provides for the suspension or revocation of industrial waste discharge permits by the General Manager for violation of the District's Ordinance, and further provides for the General Manager to hear appeals of decisions by the District's Staff; and, WHEREAS, for the proper conduct of administrative proceedings, rules of procedure should be established. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: The Rules of Procedure for Permit Suspension, Permit Revocation, Administrative Civil Penalties and Other Administrative Proceedings before the General Manager Pursuant to Sections 604, 605, 615.D and 617 of the District's Ordinance No. OCSD-01 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", dated July 1, 1998, are hereby approved and adopted. 2s s 71 1 Section 2: The Rules of Procedure for Administrative Proceedings Relating to Emergency Suspension Orders Before the General Manager Pursuant to Section 613 of the District's Ordinance No. OCSD-01 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations, attached hereto as Exhibit "B", dated July 1, 1998, are hereby approved and adopted. Section 3: This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Special Meeting held July 1, 1998. Chair ATTES Board Secr ary i zoso-aoo r sasa�_i 2 EXHIBIT "A" d RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE GENERAL MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE r� w d July 1, 1998 1 RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PERMIT SUSPENSION, .. PERMIT REVOCATION, ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL PENALTIES AND OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE GENERAL MANAGER PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 604, 605, 615.D AND 617 OF THE DISTRICT'S ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-01 ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS These Rules are intended to govern the administrative proceedings relating to permit suspension, permit revocation and administrative civil penalties, as provided in Sections 604, 605 and 615.1), and all other administrative proceedings before the General Manager (or his designee) of the Districts, including those provided pursuant to Section 617 of District Ordinance No. OCSD-01, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations ("Ordinance") of the Orange County Sanitation District. The parties to the administrative proceedings are advised that the purpose of the review by the General Manager is to determine, by examination of the record submitted at the hearing, whether the Districts' Staff("Staff') decision is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. Parties to the proceeding may, if they choose, be represented by legal counsel. The Permittee, Appellant,' or its representative, and the Staff or its representative, shall each be entitled to present their respective positions, ,. all in accordance with the following Rules of Procedure. For the purposes of these Rules, reference to the masculine gender includes the feminine, and reference to the Permittee shall include the Appellant. The terms "Permittee" and "Appellant" as used herein include any person or entity subject to administrative proceedings before the Districts. 2 The following Rules shall apply to all administrative proceedings before the ( General Manager or his designee, either of which is hereinafter referred to as the Hearing Officer, including proceedings brought pursuant to Sections 604, 605, 615.D and/or 617 of the Ordinance: 1. No later than fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the date set for the hearing, the Staff shall serve on the Permittee and file with the Hearing Officer the following: A. A brief, but complete, report or memorandum in support of the facts and any legal points and authorities upon which the Staff will rely; B. Copies of all documentary evidence to be submitted into the record in support of Staffs position. 2. No later than eight (8) calendar days before the hearing, Permittee or his representative shall serve upon Staff and file with the Hearing Officer: A. A brief, but complete, report, memorandum, or response in support of the facts and any legal points and authorities upon which he will rely; B. Copies of all documentary evidence to be submitted into the record in support of the Pennittee's position. 3. Staff shall have the right to submit evidence in reply to Permittee's positions in written form no later than two (2) days prior to the hearing, which evidence shall be served upon the Permittee and filed with the Hearing Officer. 3 4. Each party to the proceedings shall provide five (5) complete copies of all documents to be submitted for the record, which shall be served on the Hearing Officer as set forth in Sections 1, 2 and 3 above. 5. Factual contentions of both the Staff and Permittee involved in the hearing shall be presented, heard, and determined based upon the evidence submitted (including documents, photographs, etc.) and the oral arguments presented at the hearing. Any person that has filed evidence as part of the record shall be present at the hearing and subject to questioning under oath. 6. The Hearing Officer may direct questions to any person present at the hearing that has presented evidence for the hearing, or to the Permittee, or its representative, or to Staff, or its representative. 7. If the hearing date is continued for any reason, the order of continuance shall provide the new dates, if necessary, that the Permittee's and Staff's papers are due to be filed with the Hearing Officer. A continuance shall also extend the date for the Hearing Officer to make a final ruling by the same period of time as the extension. 8. If, in the sole discretion of the Hearing Officer, a hearing date is required m immediately in order to avoid a delay in the implementation of orders alleged to be necessary to protect the public health or safety or to avoid serious endangerment to the Districts' facilities or the environment, he may serve notice on both the Permittee and the Staff of his emergency order affirming, on an interim basis, the Staff decision and order and setting a hearing with an accelerated schedule of dates for filing the written documentation, in place of the dates set forth in Sections 1, 2 and 3 above. 4 _ j 9. The hearing need not be conducted according to technical judicial rules relating to evidence and witnesses. Any relevant evidence shall be admitted if it is the sort of evidence on which responsible persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of serious affairs, regardless of the existence of any common law or statutory rule which might make improper the admission of such evidence over objection in civil actions. Hearsay evidence may be used for the purpose of supplementing or explaining any direct evidence, but shall not be sufficient in itself to support a finding unless it would be admissible over objection in civil actions. The rules of privilege shall be effective to the same extent that they are now, or hereafter may be, recognized in civil actions, and irrelevant and unduly repetitious evidence shall be excluded. 10. Papers not timely filed by a party, including any memorandum or other papers required to be filed under these Rules, may, at the Hearing Officers discretion, not be considered. The Pennittee, and/or its representative, and the Source Control Manager, and/or his representative, shall be present on the hearing date to provide informed discussion and argument on the subject of the hearing. 11. The testimony shall be recorded by means of either a tape recording or a certified court reporter 12. The Hearing Officer shall decide all questions of procedure and evidence. 13. The format for the hearing shall be as described below, but may at the discretion of the Hearing Officer be modified as necessary to guarantee that all relevant information may be considered: 5 A. Call to Order B. Introductions of Parties Present C. Presentation by Staff D. Presentation by Permittee E. Questions by the Hearing Officer F. Final Statement by Staff G. Final Statement by Permittee H. Close Hearing 14. Within thirty (30) days following the conclusion of the hearing, the General Manager shall make his determination and issue his written decision and order. i 15. These Rules of Procedure are established pursuant to the authority provided by the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations, Sections 604.B.1, 605.B.1, 615.D.3 and 617.0 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01. 16. All prior Rules of Procedure governing the conduct of administrative r proceedings referred to herein are hereby rescinded. DONALD F. MCINTYR GENERAL MANAGER A OVED ASCT9 FORM � THOMASL. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL 6 r r r r r r ATTACHMENT E r Hawk Industrial Uniform Appeal Letter November 17, 2006 r r r r r r r r I r RE(CFIV' APPEAL mi 17 FM 2, N TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND IN PARTICULAR THE STEERING COMMITTEE THERE OF: �.�LJL) hir' +�Now comes Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins, �y� jlQs the Order of Suspension of the Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-1-079. The Appeal is also as to the finding that $71891.72 eadsts in user charges, the finding that any Administrative Penalty should be applied, and all other ancillary orders, made in connection therewith The Order itself has been misplaced, so that I cannot find the date it was issued, but we believe it is effective as of the close of business today, if not appealed by then. The basis for the appeal is as follows: The operations and been turned over to Larry Booher. His compensation was based on performance. The company had no knowledge that there was an alleged illegal by-pass installed. This was an act outside the scope of his duties and for which the company bears no responsibilities. Further the County was aware of Mr. Booher's responsibility, as not only did they deal with him, but addressed their correspondence to him. The company has always attempted to fully comply with the OCSD rules and regulations, and to engage in good environmental practices. In fact Rusty Hawkins has served on the „r Orange County Coalition. As soon the company learned of the alleged situation, Hawk immediately call Norchem and requested a waste pre-treatment unit be provided. The$71891.72, is simply not correct. Without notice to us, the county changed our annual reconciliation both as to method and rate. Further, included in this sum were forecast amounts for a year based on these unknown changes. Also this sum includes ,. improper penalties. When the bill was received it was believed that the county put the decimal point in the wrong place, as they had previously done with respect to the Mercury allegedly being discharged in the water. Further Hawk is engaged in efforts to .d reduce almost all of their waste effluent characteristically high in TTO's This appeal is being made pursuant to Section 618 OCSD 01. — The undersigned hereby requests the hearing on appeal provided for under the Rules and Regulations of the OSCD — I l Dazed: November 17, 2006 Hawk nif Fn � r By r wkins, pr dntwfns �.' C r ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT r The undersigned hereby acknowledges the recei t of the foregoing appeal this I7day oMovember 2006 at (:3s o'clock eM r �� Sr�� Kelly Christensen r r p -, O N CO r � a w n CIJ Q) r 1.1..1 '. i (� r rr C. r r r r r _ d d d d E7MIT H DOCUMENTATION PERTAINING TO HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM APPEAL HEARING d d January 24, 2007 d J e/ r d 900Z `VZ .sago;aO .iagoog Sjluj jo aoueaeiaaQ V .LAIHHRJdIIV 10/24/2000 06 41 FAX IQ 002/003 1 DECLARATION OF LARRY BOOHER 2 1, Larry Bucher, declare: 3 1. 1 have personal knowledge of the following facts and if called as a witness, 1 4 could and would testify competently as follows. 5 2. 1 was an employee of Hawk Industrial Uniform ('Hawk Industrial"), located at 6 1120 N. Armando Street, Anaheim, California for approximately nine(9) years. r 7 3. Rusty Hawkins, as President and owner o1 Hawk Industrial, is responsible for 8 the operations and industrial wastewater discharge activities at Hawk Industrial Uniform. 9 4. On or about March 31, 1998, Mr. Hawkins hired me as a Production Manager. 10 My responsibilities as a Production Manager included overseeing all aspects of the 'y 11 Industrial laundry, including calculating time cards for payroll, employee scheduling, 12 operation, maintenance and upkeep of the industrial washers and dryers and related a 13 infrastructure, including the wastewater treatinent clarifiers, and wastewater testing and lk@ al' 14 reporting. I reported directly to Mr. Hawkins. 15 5. Hawk Industrial is an industrial laundry that rents and washes soiled uniforms, 16 floor mats, dust mops, gloves, and shop towels, print towels, and oil laden towels. Hawk r 17 Industrial Uniform's wastewater-generating operations include wastewater from the 19 washing, dyeing, and rinsing processes. In addition to wastewater from laundering and 19 dyeing operations, the facility discharges brine from the water-softening system through a 20 three-stage underground clarifier. 21 6. Since my employment commenced in March, 1998, Hawk Industrial has been 22 discharging wastewater from the laundering and dyeing operations directly into a manhole 23 located on the property. Wastewater generated from the washing machines travels via a 24 trench to a sump. A submersible pump in the sump pumped this wastewater through a 25 subterranean pipe, which re-emerged underneath, and was hidden by, a sink on the north 26 wall of the facility. The pipe subsequently penetrated the wall and ran alongside the 27 building, where it discharged to a standpipe. The standpipe discharged directly to a .. 28 manhole on the property, entirely bypassing the underground clarifier and the designated r m DECLARATION OF LARRY BOOHLR nv010 10/24/2006 00:41 FAX 1AD03/003 1 sample point. r 2 7. Mr. Hawkins was at all times during my employment aware that wastewater 3 generated from the laundering operation was being directly discharged into the manhole 4 and directed that these pipelines be installed at the locations described in paragraph B. r 5 8. At the direction of Mr. Hawkins, Hawk Industrial employees regularly cleaned 6 out two sump pits that were the initial discharge points for the wastewater flows. These pits ,r 7 routinely filled with grease, oil, sludge and other byproducts from the industrial wastewater. 8 In accordance with routing cleaning practices established by Mr. Hawkins, Hawk Industrial r 9 employees would shovel the wastewater byproducts into 55 gallon drums and dump the 10 byproducts into the manhole located on the property. 'y 11 9. 1 was also responsible for overseeing the wastewater testing and reporting for 12 Hawk Industrial pursuant to the terms of the and routinely filed reports consistent with the r y@ 13 direction provided by Mr. Hawkins. In general, the wastewater that was collected from the 14 sampling point was routinely diluted with water to obtain a favorable result and to ensure r 5�E 15 compliance with the terms of the wastewater discharge permit 16 1 declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that 17 the foregoing is true and correct. , r 18 Executed on October o 1 2006, Santa Ana, California. 19 20 Y B ER 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 DECLARATION OF LARRY BOOHER A;WE.1 r .I r r ATTACHMENT B r Authorization for Designated Signatory February 25, 2004 r r r r r r r r r Sent dY: OCSD{ lla 9be b9�i 9ubmlt Nle form only If the Reaponslblo off tear wane to designate a Signatory. Authorization for Desigpated Signatory Thais to authorize the individual whose norm)and tale appear below, m '10treV papMNp Syln aM/.M nRpe RYIPLrgf rMe to be the designated uldrwdual responsible W waslewafgr discharges who can be served with notices, and who is the Designated Signatory on my behaff for purposes of signing all reports This individual has the responsibility for the overall operation of the facility andler overall responsibility for compliance wilt,all regulatory requirements for this taaaay from which the wastewater discharge originates. I understand that If, in the future, this mtormalion is no /anger correct, the District will be noted in writing to terminate designation of the above-named mdividual and to aslablish a new signalory. Name Of Responsible y7s ow y Hf real Signature Title V f' Dale '✓ _�� Company Name "ll`-' �y'T�� permit No. s ArmPonleb orlRr is Mai id as rulket: r. Fm afarpwlfkn: '� a. A paetlek,aawnary,baaawer,w via-peakeM d ma rurpmWbn n[hnrye of IM pdncbal but .NncM.. or wry velar person Mw peMms Ylirlr pvehr w declMonmYwq nMtlerw b Ind wmrrraron,w n. rib minlpPd wwwmore minlilaaweie,pre8rdkn,ororkrlrbnhuwaa Ptporbl'mweaun35o panwro w nwene Biota MmiY aaM P nginidtwea eeonFq 125 Mien(k mwldpWdP leBa dolknl.a WlnwRy to aqn dwan+rMa nail 4een nrleMd w da4ePld ro aN menaper M RmMlww Mllrrppar'b Mew[rulea s I LPpwtMkNOIX land pWiblanM1b,1VMM111pMMrtl ehplklw.ie[pegMde. 1 accept fire rasponsibady for the overall operagon of the facility andrer overall responsibility for compliance with all legulatory requirements for this facility from which the wastewater discharge orginates. I understand theta is my responsibility to keep the Responsible Officer mformed oral)Ames regarding all permit and enforcement issues. .a Name of Designated Sig �,rirrPPl Signature r Title , w!'fi r i✓/z- Date? Oy All correspondence regarding an Permit and enforcement Issues she[$ be Pont to the Designated Signatory. It Is the Designated Signatory's responsibility to keep the Responsible Officer Informed at all three regarding sg permit and enforcement Issues. The Responsible Officer remains legally responsible for all wastewater discharge to the sewer from this facility and for ensuring that he is duly Informed by the Designated Signatory. Ix a...J.Mye, M r N ......1.Ru[untl.MR.vet ro.�I h r r r r r r ATTACHMENT C General Manager's Hearing Decision and Order November 2, 2006 r r r r r r r r _ 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ,r November 2, 2006 .6.n.: Rusty Hawkins, President (714)952 2411 Hawk Industrial Uniform VIACiFRTIFIED MAIL _ ea: i7141962-0396 3001 E. La Palma Avenue ..iiiid...m Anaheim, CA 92708 _, a.6bq.tldr..e: PO em B12> F°""92 213-13 2' Subject: Administrative Complaint Hearin Decision and Order szTze-91n 1 P 9 auexdm..0 Re: Hawk Industrial Uniform, Permit No. 2-1-079 r 1 03W .l Ellis. Valley F.unce in Valley fA 92708-7016 This letter shall serve as notice to Rusty's Dust 8 Towel, Inc., dba Hawk Industrial Uniform, of the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) decision and order to uphold the enclosed recommended decision of the Administrative Hearing Officer, p.n.s Paul Marlyn, in the administrative proceeding held on October 24, 2006. The C1ti.. Hearing Officer has determined that grounds exist for the assessment of an administrative penalty in the amount of Forty-Five Thousand Dollars ($45,000.00) for 4n.n.lm eight discharge violations and altering the monitoring data by bypassing the ere. _ Buena Park designated sample point; Seventy-One Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-One and Press 721100 Dollars ($71,891.72)for user charges, annual invoices, penalties and Fountain Valley Fad.ren finance charges due; and permit suspension for a minimum of thirty (30) days, and s"°°° until the amounts specified above are received, and the necessary pretreatment Hunpngron 6eecA o-nn. equipment to reasonably assure compliance with all applicable effluent limits is La Hama installed and operational. La Palma rl Los Alamitos Ne C each Therefore, I have determined that Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins, and Pbcen. Orea a each of them, be assessed an administrative penalty in the amount of$45,000.00 Santa Ane and are required to pay user charges, annual invoices, penalties and finance —� seal e.atn charges due in the amount of$71,891.72. Additionally, Hawk Industrial Uniform's 4anron Tustin Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit Number 2-1-079 is suspended for a period ""'e Perk of not less than thirty (30) days. The permit suspension shall continue thereafter Vwba Lnde until such time as the total amount of One Hundred Sixteen Thousand Eight e.m,ey .l or.... Hundred Ninety-One and 72/100 Dollars ($116,891.72) is paid in full. The permit suspension shall also continue until the necessary pretreatment equipment to assure sanitary oi.tri.e. compliance with all applicable effluent limits is installed and operational. Please be Costa Mesa advised that Permit No. 2-1-079 is suspended effective November 18, 2006, and MO., cry the $116,891.72 must be remitted to the District, and the pretreatment system r wets Cistrltt. installed and operational, by December 18, 2006, unless a timely appeal is fled. If no timely appeal is filed, Hawk Industrial Uniform must cease and desist all o-"'ne Sancn wastewater discharges to the District's sewerage system on November 18, 2006. Section 604 of the District's Ordinance provides that any person aggrieved by this order may file a request for an appeal hearing with the Steering Committee pursuant to Section 618 of the Ordinance. If Hawk Industrial Uniform decides to file a request Rusty Hawkins, Hawk Industrial Uniform November 2, 20D6 Page 2 for an appeal, the District must receive the appeal hearing request within fifteen (15) days from this notification; therefore, the appeal request must by submitted no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 17, 2006. Please be advised that the provisions of Section 618 require that the request for a hearing shall set forth in detail all the issues in dispute for which you seek determination and all facts supporting your request. Furthermore, a written request for hearing must be accompanied by an appeal fee of$400.00. A copy of Section 618 is enclosed for your convenience. Hawk Industrial Uniform is reminded that its industrial wastewater discharge is expected to be in compliance with all limits at all times. Any discharge violations occurring after the issuance of this administrative complaint will be served under a separate complaint. If you have any questions, please call Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager, at (714)593-7410. James D. Ruth Interim General Manager JDR:MT:MH:fe H:WepN S4OWiz ndoWoIN93807.d. Certified Mail: 7003 3110 0002 3655 3557 Enclosure cc: Brad Hogin, Esq. Ed Torres Mahin Talebi Angela Brandt Kelly Christensen Martin Holl see w' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY ses 1955 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, CA 90601-1400 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 4998, Whittier, CA 90607-4998 LAMES F. STAHL Telephone: (562) 699-7411, FAX: (562) 699-5422 n Chief Engineer and General Manager www.la<sd.org cc: 1 11'GF` October 30,2006^ Mr.James Ruth Interim General Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts FII0 Original On October 23,2006 an Administrative Compliant Hearing was held for Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins,President(Hawk)at the Sanitation Districts'(Districts)administrative office in Fountain Valley,California. In attendance for the Districts were Mahin Talebi,Source Control Manager,Martin Holl, and Dave Francis,together with several Source Control Staff and Bradley R. Hogin of Woodruff,Spradlin and Stuart. The Hearing Officer was Paul Marlyn, Head of the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Industrial Waste Section.There were no representatives from Hawk. The proceedings were recorded by Pamela Cotter,a court reporter with Tomell&Cotton. This Administrative Complaint Hearing was scheduled under the procedures specified in the Districts' Resolution No. OCSD 98-14. The reason for this Administrative Complaint Hearing was Hawks failure to comply with the terms and conditions of their industrial wastewater discharge permit, namely bypassing industrial wastewater around prescribed monitory facilities,violating established effluent standards and nonpayment of user chargers. Testimony was provided that documented Hawk's installation of an illegal bypass line prior to March 16,2006. The construction of this bypass was further supported in the declaration of Larry Booher,the former Production Manager at Hawk. The purpose of the bypass was determined to be the concealment of off-specification wastewater. Hawk was subject to wastewater effluent limits for total toxic organics(TTOs)and oil and grease. The limit for TTOs was 0.58 mg/I;the limit for ail Bud grease was 200 mg/I. There were eight documented instances since October 2005 that these limits were exceeded. Unpaid user charges,together with penalty and finance charges currently amount to a$71,891.72 balance owed by Hawk. ses Upon conclusion of the Districts' presentation of the facts and the failure of Hawk to present any defense or explanation, it is the recommendation of the Hearing Officer that monetary penalties in the amount of$45,000(for the eight numerical effluent violations and the operation of the bypass line) and ee $71,891.72 in unpaid user charges be assessed against Hawk. Moreover,that Hawk be subject to a 30- day suspension of their industrial wastewater discharge permit and their ability to discharge wastewater to the Districts' sewerage system,at a time to be determined by the Districts' General Manager. It is also ees recommended that if Hawk elects to resume discharging wastewater to the sewerage system that they pay in full the$116,891.72 assessment and install,to the satisfaction of the Districts' General Manager,the necessary pretreatment equipment to reasonably assure compliance with all applicable effluent limits. see Paul Marlyn Hearing Officer PCM:dfd #708705 aar�rled P,,,,o. 60 r r r r r r ATTACHMENT D r Hawk Industrial Uniform Administrative Complaint and Notice r September 12, 2006 r r r r r r r r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT September 12, 2006 .. 17141962-2411 Rusty Hawkins, President ,r (7141962d 56 Hawk Industrial Uniform .acad.. 1120 N. Armando Street muting am. .: Anaheim, CA 92806 e¢ S.8127 9zi 2e 812 Subject: Administrative Complaint and Hearing Notice ..,«.am,.a.: Re: Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-1-079 1OB44 She Avenue ve F.untein Valley.G 9270B.7018 This letter serves to notify Hawk Industrial Uniform, and Rusty Hawkins, owner a.: MamMr and president of Hawk Industrial Uniform and the person responsible for assuring compliance with the provisions of Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-1-079, of the enclosed Administrative Complaint issued to Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins pursuant to the authority of California Menem Government Code Sections 54739-54740.6 at. seq., the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Section 1251 et. se B. vark q.), and Section 615.D of the Wastewater Discharge L}preaa Regulations (Ordinance) of the Orange County Sanitation District (District). A F°" u F .,. hearing regarding this matter will be conducted on October 24, 2006 at 10:00 Fullerton Gatlen G' a a.m., at the District's offices located at 10844 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley, Hunulg[an Beech 1rvin. California. La Haute A Palma Lea a As described in the enclosed Administrative Complaint, District staff W Nm An Beach Ba.en rkange recommends that Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins, jointly and Placenua severally, be assessed a total administrative penalty in the amount of Forty- Bah. Ana Seat Beach Five Thousand Dollars ($45,000.00) for eight discharge violations that -• Seannan occurred between October 25, 2005 and July 10, 2006, and avoiding rusnn Va.van: representative sampling of its discharge and thus altering the monitoring data, 1 W Lme. in violation of its Permit No. 2-1-079 and the District's Ordinance. The e.a.q .r Dr..9. Complaint also seeks to collect the sum of Ninety-Six Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Nine 63/100 Dollars ($96,569.63), the past due user charges, s..War. Dlsarf... annual invoices, penalties and finance charges owed to the District. ^° Chew A4eaa Furthermore, the Complaint also recommends the suspension of Hawk Mahaay coy Industrial Uniform's Permit No. 2-1-079 for a minimum of thirty (30) days, Water Diavl4te and until the total amount of One Hundred Forty-One Thousand Five Irvin.Banes Hundred Sixty-Nine 63/100 Dollars ($141,569.63) is received, and until Hawk Industrial Uniform demonstrates compliance with all requirements described in the complaint. r r r Rusty Hawkins, President Page 2 September 12, 2006 At the hearing, Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins will have an opportunity to respond to the allegations set forth in the Administrative Complaint in accordance with the District's Rules of Procedure, enclosed herewith. Please note that any documentation to be submitted by Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins in opposition to the Administrative Complaint must be submitted to the District and filed with the Hearing Officer no later than eight (8)days before the hearing. The deadline for submittal will be 4:30 p.m. on October 15, 2006. If you have any questions, please contact Mahin Talebi at (714) 593-7410. — gG�vG — v//James D. Ruth Interim General Manager JR:fe H:Wep„%\WWizwdoW o1ft393745.dw Enclosures cc: Brad Hogin, Esq. Ed Torres Mahin Talebi Dave Francis RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98-14 ADOPTING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PERMIT SUSPENSION. PERMIT REVOCATION, ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL PENALTIES. APPEALS, AND OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE GENERAL MANAGER r PURSUANT TO DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-01 ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PERMIT SUSPENSION, PERMIT ^" REVOCATION, ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL PENALTIES, APPEALS AND OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE GENERAL MANAGER PURSUANT TO DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-01, ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS WHEREAS, the District has adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-01, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations; and, W WHEREAS, said Ordinance No. OCSD-01, Article 6, establishes detailed enforcement provisions to insure compliance with all the rules and requirements for discharges to the District's system; and, WHEREAS, said Ordinance No. OCSD-01 provides for the suspension or revocation of industrial waste discharge permits by the General Manager for violation of the District's Ordinance, and further provides for the General Manager to hear appeals of decisions by the District's Staff; and, WHEREAS, for the proper conduct of administrative proceedings, rules of procedure should be established. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: The Rules of Procedure for Permit Suspension, Permit Revocation, Administrative Civil Penalties and Other Administrative Proceedings before the General Manager Pursuant to Sections 604, 605, 615.D and 617 of the District's Ordinance No. OCSD-01 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", dated July 1, 1998, are hereby approved and adopted. taxi sasa> > 1 Section 2: The Rules of Procedure for Administrative Proceedings Relating to Emergency Suspension Orders Before the General Manager Pursuant to Section 613 of the District's Ordinance No. OCSD-01 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations, attached hereto as Exhibit "B", dated July 1, 1998, are hereby approved and adopted. Section 3: This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Special Meeting held July 1, 1998. Chair ATTES Board Secr6jary meo-3oo r sasa> > 2 866L 'LAmr i 33NEJIS3a SIH 1:10 N3EJVNVW lVH3N39 3H13HO=138 SONIM30021d 3AI1VMISINIWaV HOd 3una33OMd d0 S3-inm „V„ 1191HX3 RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PERMIT SUSPENSION, PERMIT REVOCATION, ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL PENALTIES AND OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE GENERAL MANAGER PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 604, 605, 615.13 AND 617 OF THE DISTRICT'S ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-01 ESTABLISHING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE REGULATIONS - These Rules are intended to govern the administrative proceedings relating to permit suspension, permit revocation and administrative civil penalties, as provided in Sections 604, 605 and 615.1), and all other administrative proceedings before the General Manager (or his designee) of the Districts, including those provided pursuant to Section 617 of District Ordinance No. OCSD-01, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations ("Ordinance") of the Orange County Sanitation District. j The parties to the administrative proceedings are advised that the purpose of the review by the General Manager is to determine, by examination of the record submitted at the hearing, whether the Districts' Staff ("Staff') decision is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. Parties to the proceeding may, if they choose, be represented by legal counsel. The Permittee, Appellant,' or its representative, and the Staff or its representative, shall each be entitled to present their respective positions, all in accordance with the following Rules of Procedure. For the purposes of these Rules, reference to the masculine gender includes the feminine, and reference to the Permiltee shall include the Appellant. The terms "Permiltee" and "Appellant" as used herein include any person or entity subject to administrative proceedings before the Districts. 2 _ The following Rules shall apply to all administrative proceedings before the ( General Manager or his designee, either of which is hereinafter referred to as the Hearing Officer, including proceedings brought pursuant to Sections 604, 605, 615.D and/or 617 of the Ordinance: 1. No later than fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the date set for the hearing, the Staff shall serve on the Permittee and file with the Hearing Officer the following: A. A brief, but complete, report or memorandum in support of the facts and any legal points and authorities upon which the Staff will rely; d B. Copies of all documentary evidence to be submitted into the record ® in support of Staffs position. y� 2. No later than eight (8) calendar days before the hearing, Permittee or his representative shall serve upon Staff and file with the Hearing Officer: A. A brief, but complete, report, memorandum, or response in support of the facts and any legal points and authorities upon which he will rely; B. Copies of all documentary evidence to be submitted into the record in support of the Permittee's position. 3. Staff shall have the right to submit evidence in reply to Permittee's positions in written form no later than two (2) days prior to the hearing, which evidence shall be served upon the Permittee and filed with the Hearing Officer. 3 4. Each party to the proceedings shall provide five (5) complete copies of all ® ( documents to be submitted for the record, which shall be served on the Hearing Officer .. as set forth in Sections 1, 2 and 3 above. 5. Factual contentions of both the Staff and Permittee involved in the hearing shall be presented, heard, and determined based upon the evidence submitted (including documents, photographs, etc.) and the oral arguments presented at the hearing. Any person that has filed evidence as part of the record shall be present at the hearing and subject to questioning under oath. 6. The Hearing Officer may direct questions to any person present at the hearing that has presented evidence for the hearing, or to the Permittee, or its representative, or to Staff, or its representative. 7. If the hearing date is continued for any reason, the order of continuance shall provide the new dates, if necessary, that the Permittee's and Staffs papers are due to be filed with the Hearing Officer. A continuance shall also extend the date for the Hearing Officer to make a final ruling by the same period of time as the extension. 8. If, in the sole discretion of the Hearing Officer, a hearing date is required immediately in order to avoid a delay in the implementation of orders alleged to be necessary to protect the public health or safety or to avoid serious endangerment to the Districts' facilities or the environment, he may serve notice on both the Permittee and the Staff of his emergency order affirming, on an interim basis, the Staff decision and order and setting a hearing with an accelerated schedule of dates for filing the written documentation, in place of the dates set forth in Sections 1, 2 and 3 above. 4 9. The hearing need not be conducted according to technical judicial rules relating to evidence and witnesses. Any relevant evidence shall be admitted if it is the sort of evidence on which responsible persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of serious affairs, regardless of the existence of any common law or statutory rule which might make improper the admission of such evidence over objection in civil actions. Hearsay evidence may be used for the purpose of supplementing or explaining any �^ direct evidence, but shall not be sufficient in itself to support a finding unless it would be admissible over objection in civil actions. The rules of privilege shall be effective to the same extent that they are now, or hereafter may be, recognized in civil actions, and irrelevant and unduly repetitious evidence shall be excluded. 10. Papers not timely filed by a party, including any memorandum or other papers required to be filed under these Rules, may, at the Hearing Officer's discretion, not be considered. The Permittee, and/or its representative, and the Source Control Manager, and/or his representative, shall be present on the hearing date to provide informed discussion and argument on the subject of the hearing. 11. The testimony shall be recorded by means of either a tape recording or a certified court reporter. 12. The Hearing Officer shall decide all questions of procedure and evidence. 13. The format for the hearing shall be as described below, but may at the discretion of the Hearing Officer be modified as necessary to guarantee that all relevant information may be considered: 5 A. Call to Order B. Introductions of Parties Present C. Presentation by Staff D. Presentation by Permittee E. Questions by the Hearing Officer F. Final Statement by Staff G. Final Statement by Permittee H. Close Hearing 14. Within thirty (30) days following the conclusion of the hearing, the General Manager shall make his determination and issue his written decision and order. 15. These Rules of Procedure are established pursuant to the authority provided by the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations, Sections 604.B.1, 605.B.1, 615.D.3 and 617.0 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01. 16. All prior Rules of Procedure governing the conduct of administrative proceedings referred to herein are hereby rescinded. DONALD F. McINTYRIZ- GENERAL MANAGER A OVED AS T? FOR�M�:t3� THOM�OODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL 6 r r r r r r ATTACHMENT E Hawk Industrial Uniform Appeal Letter November 17, 2006 r r r r r r RECEIV ==� .APPEAL u 17 FM 2: 00 TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND IN PARTICULAR THE STEERING COMMITTEE THERE OF: `�G ju — Now comes Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins,P8Q'h _ses the Order of Suspension of the Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-1-079. r The Appeal is also as to the finding that$71891.72 exists in user charges, the finding that any Administrative Penalty should be applied, and all other ancillary orders, made in r connection therewith The Order itself has been misplaced, so that I cannot find the date it was issued, but we believe it is effective as of the close of business today, if not appealed by then. The basis for the appeal is as follows: The operations and been turned over to Larry Bucher. His compensation was based on performance. The company had no knowledge that there was an alleged illegal by-pass installed. This was an act outside the scope of his duties and for which the company bears no responsibilities. r Further the County was aware of Mr. Booker's responsibility, as not only did they deal with him, but addressed their correspondence to him. r The company has always attempted to fully comply with the OCSD rules and regulations, and to engage in good environmental practices. In fact Rusty Hawkins has served on the r Orange County Coalition. As soon the company learned of the alleged situation, Hawk immediately call Norchem and requested a waste pre-treatment unit be provided. ,., The S71891.72, is simply not correct. Without notice to us, the county changed our annual reconciliation both as to method and rate. Further, included in this sum were forecast amounts for a year based on these unknown changes. Also this sum includes r improper penalties. When the bill was received it was believed that the county put the decimal point in the wrong place, as they had previously done with respect to the Mercury allegedly being discharged in the water. Further Hawk is engaged in efforts to reduce almost all of thew waste effluent characteristically high in TTO's This appeal is being made pursuant to Section 618 OCSD 01. The undersigned hereby requests the hearing on aooeal provided for under the Rules and Regulations of the OSCD — t _ Dated: November 17. 2006 Hawk Indus nif r BY wkins, pr ident s Hawkins s r r ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT r the undersigned hereby acknowledges the recei t of the foregoing appeal this 17day of November 2006 at ( ;3a o'clock am/ To Kelly Christensen r p UjLU U 'Q W X r r r r r r • ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT • Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins, President 1120 N. Armando Street Anaheim, CA 92806 INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT NO. 2-1-079 September 12, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS r Section Title Page 1. Summary 2 It. Legal Authority 3 III. Background 3 ,e IV. Discharge Violations 4 V. Basis for Enforcement Actions 8 VI. Recommendation 9 Exhibits r A Industrial Wastewater Discharge Class 1 Permit No. 2-1-079 Industrial Wastewater Discharge Class I Permit Application B Photograph of the Designated Sample Point C Past Due Invoices and Correspondence D Notices of Violation and Wastewater Analysis Reports E Enforcement Correspondence F Photographs of the bypass pump, piping, and the bypass discharge standpipe G Order to Cease Violation of Industrial Wastewater Permit Conditions, r March 23,2006 r r I. SUMMARY .. Hawk Industrial Uniform,located at 1120 N.Armando Street,Anaheim,California,is an industrial laundry that rents and washes soiled uniforms,floor mats,dust mops,gloves, and shop towels. Hawk Industrial Uniform also dyes and bleaches new shop towels and other materials. After washing,the items are dried,ironed as necessary, sorted, and returned to the respective clients. Rusty Hawkins, as President and owner, is responsible for the operations and industrial wastewater discharge activities at Hawk Industrial Uniform at all material times referred to in this Complaint. The Orange County Sanitation District(District)initially issued Class I Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit No. 2-1-079 to Hawk Industrial Uniform in May 1994. Permit No. 2-1-079 contains discharge limits and standard conditions that comply with the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations, Ordinance No. OCSD- 01 (Ordinance). Since the initial permit issuance in May 1994, Hawk Industrial Uniform has had several major violations of its permitted Total Toxic Organic (TTO) and Oil &Grease (0&G) limits. Compliance meetings to address the discharge violations were held in February 2000; February 2004; and August 2004. The causes of the discharge violation were discussed and identified to be the laundering of shop towels laden with solvents and oils. Compliance orders to cease noncompliant discharges were also issued in January and July 2004. Hawk Industrial Uniform's response was limited to terminating its customer accounts thought to be the source of the TTO and O&G discharge violations. Since the corrective measures taken by Hawk Industrial Uniform failed to correct the discharge violations,in September 2004,the District required the company to install a pretreatment system to treat its wastewater prior to discharge to the District's sewer system. In October 2004, Rusty Hawkins informed the District by letter that,due to inadequate existing electrical service and City of Anaheim requirements, he could not commit to any specific dates for installation of a pretreatment system. Following Hawk Industrial Uniform's failure to install a pretreatment system, in May 2005, the District advised Hawk Industrial Uniform that the District will continue to monitor Hawk Industrial Uniform's discharge and,if another violation occurs,the District will escalate enforcement action. Although Hawk Industrial Uniform continued to wash shop towels,and despite continuing to operate without a pretreatment system,all of the onsite samples collected between January 2005 and March 2006 (with the exception of one TTO discharge violation in October 2005),were in compliance. On March 16, 2006, the District inspected Hawk's facility and discovered that the wastewater discharged from washing machines used to launder shop towels was pumped through a pipe which discharged directly to a manhole in the street, thereby bypassing the designated sample box at the end of the underground clarifier. Based on the configuration of the piping relative to the clarifier, the District concluded that Hawk Industrial Uniform has avoided representative sampling, and thus altered the monitoring data, by bypassing the District's designated sample point stated in its Permit No. 2-1.079. Bypass of industrial wastewater and altering monitoring data constitutes a violation of Sections 501.4 and 604.A.4 of the District's Ordinance and Section II.A.2 and III.E of Hawk Industrial Uniform's discharge permit. Hawk ,. Industrial Uniform's permit also states that knowingly making any false statement on any report or other document required by this permit or knowingly rendering any monitoring device or method inaccurate is a crime and may result in the imposition of criminal sanctions and/or civil penalties. Furthermore, as of September 12, 2006, Hawk Industrial Uniform owes the District the sum of$96,569.63. The oldest invoices are now 271 days past due. Other than the recent permit renewal fee of$1570.00, the r 2 EHnk Admin6baM Compint 091206FINALM last payment received was on August 1, 2005 for the 2004/05 4s quarter invoice. Pursuant to the authority of California Government Code Sections 54739 at seq., the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Section 1251 at seq.),Sections 604.A.4,604.A.9,and 615.D of the District's Ordinance,the District's staff recommends imposition of a thirty (30) day permit suspension and assessment of administrative penalties in the amount of Forty-five Thousand Dollars($45,000.00),and user charges,annual invoices, penalties and finance charges due in the amount of Ninety-Six Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Nine 631100 Dollars($96,569.63),jointly and severally on Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins for violations of Permit No. 2-1-079 and the District's Ordinance. The permit suspension shall continue for a minimum of thirty(30)days,and until the total amount of One Hundred Forty-One Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Nine 63/100 Dollars($141,569.63)is received,and until all the necessary pretreatment equipment to fully ensure long-term compliance is in place and operational. An administrative hearing will be held on October 24,2006 at 10:00 a.m.at the Administrative Office located at 10644 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley to provide Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins an opportunity to respond to the District's evidence and to be given an opportunity to present evidence as to why the District should not suspend Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit and impose administrative penalties as set forth herein. It. LEGAL AUTHORITY Pursuant to California Government Codes 54739 et seq., the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Section 1251 at seq.), and Sections 604.A.4,604.A.9, and 615.1)of the District's Ordinance, the District has the authority to suspend a permit and assess administrative penalties for violations of the District's Ordinance and any permit condition,prohibition,or effluent limits. The suspension and administrative penalties recommended herein are based on the violations of the District's Ordinance as stated in Part III.E of Hawk Industrial Uniform's Permit No.2-1-079. III. BACKGROUND A. Regulations and Facts Applicable to Hawk Industrial Uniform 1. Hawk Industrial Uniform is an industrial laundry that rents and washes soiled uniforms,floor mats,dust ., mops, gloves, and shop towels. Hawk Industrial Uniform also dyes and bleaches new shop towels and other materials. After washing,the items are dried,ironed as necessary,sorted,and returned to the respective clients. 2. Hawk Industrial Uniform's wastewater-generating operations include wastewater from the washing, dyeing,and rinsing processes. In addition to wastewater from laundering and dyeing operations,the facility discharges brine from the water-softening system through a three-stage underground clarifier. 3. Hawk Industrial Uniform is a"Significant Industrial User"as defined by Part 403.3(t),Section 40,of the _ United States Environmental Protection Agency's Code of Federal Regulations,and was first issued a Class I permit(Permit No. 2-1-079)to discharge industrial wastewater in May 1994. Al the time of permit issuance, Hawk Industrial Uniform was classified as an industrial laundry subject to the ,� 3 EHan Admimmnve GwpWint 091206FINAM r provisions of the District's Ordinance and the local limits contained therein. 4. In May 2006,the District last renewed Permit No.2-1-079 with a permitted flow base of 23,000 gallons per day. A copy of the permit is presented in Exhibit A. 5. Hawk Industrial Uniform has no pretreatment system. 6. Hawk Industrial Uniform's Permit No. 2-1-079 states, on page 2 under'Sampling Point Location", 'The sample point is a sample box and represents all industrial wastewaterdischarge from the facility." Both Hawk Industrial Uniform and the District have used this sample point for monitoring purposes since Permit No.2-1-079 was first issued in May1994. Acopy of the photograph of the sample box is presented in Exhibit B. 7. As of September 12,2006, Hawk Industrial Uniform owes the District$96,569.63. Specifically, this is the sum of$48,701.84 in quarterly invoices for user charges,$32,614.57 in annual invoices, and $15,253.22 in penalties and finance charges. Other than the$1570.00 permit renewal fee, the last payment received was on August 1, 2005 for the 2004/05 40,quarter invoice. The oldest invoices are now 271 days past due. Copies of the invoices due and late notices are presented in Exhibit C. 8. Rusty Hawkins as President and owner has been the person responsible for operations at Hawk Industrial Uniform at all material times referred to in this Complaint. His responsibilities include overseeing on a daily basis Hawk Industrial Uniform's operations and industrial wastewaterdischarge activities. He is also responsible for ensuring compliance with Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit conditions. A copy of Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit application signed by Rusty Hawkins is presented in Exhibit A. IV. DISCHARGE VIOLATIONS The following describes Hawk Industrial Uniform's violations and enforcement history from the time the permit was first issued. r 1. As shown in Table 1 on the following page, since the initial permit issuance in May 1994, Hawk Industrial Uniform has had the following discharge violations of its permitted Total Toxic Organic(TTO) and Oil&Grease(0&G)limits: r 4 MHmk Mftnatra CompWW 0912D6FIW11 Table 1 Onsite Sampling Violations Date Sample Type Constituent Concentration Over Limit Over Limit Violation Type m lI m r. 0911911994 Grab 5-2 O&G 285.00 85.00 43 Major 1111811994 Grab 2 TTO 2.04 1.46 252 Major 0911111996 Grab 2 TTO 1.70 1.12 193 Major 1012411996 Grab 2 TTO 5.04 4.46 769 Major 0911011998 Grab 2 O&G 301.00 101.00 51 Major 01/2611999 Grab 2 TTO 88.32 87.74 16128 Major 01/2611999 Grab 2 O&G 940.00 740.00 1 370 Major 09/09/1999 Grab 2 TTO 1.50 0.92 159 Major 09/09/1999 Grab 2 O&G 254.00 54.00 27 Major 1113011999 2C O&G 348.00 148.00 74 Major 05/0fi12003 Grab 2 TTO 12.27 11.69 2016 Major 12/23/1003 Grab 2 TTO 15.74 15.16 2614 Major 05/2712004 Grab 2 TTO 65.77 65.19 11240 Major 05127r2004 Grab 2 06G 318.00 118.00 59 Major 12M312004 le 5-2C TTO 0.69 0.11 19 Minor 1025/1005 Grab 2 TTO 1.80 122 210 Major Copies of the Notices of Violation and Wastewater Analysis Reports for the above-mentioned discharge violations are presented in Exhibit D. 2. Compliance meetings to address the discharge violations were held between Hawk Industrial Uniform and the District on February 16. 2000; February 11, 2004; and August 23,2004. Orders to Cease Noncompliant Discharge were issued on January 21, 2004 and July 27, 2004. Hawk Industrial r Uniform's response was limited to terminating the customer accounts thought to be the source of the TTO and O&G discharge violations, and instructing drivers to reject unacceptable loads. The violations recurred in spite of these claims of corrective measures. Therefore, in a letter dated September24,2004,the District required Hawk Industrial Uniform to install a pretreatment system and submit a schedule for the installation to the District. In a response letter dated October 27, 2004, Hawk Industrial Uniform stated that due to inadequate existing electrical service and City of Anaheim ,. requirements, they couldn't commit to any specific dates for installation of a pretreatment system. Therefore, Hawk Industrial Uniform failed to fulfill its commitment to a date for completion of pretreatment system installation to resolve the discharge violations on a long-term basis. Copies of err the correspondence is presented in Exhibit E. 3. Following Hawk Industrial Uniform's failure to install a pretreatment system, on May 27, 2005, the District sent a compliance status review letter advising Hawk Industrial Uniform of its failure to ensure long-term compliance with discharge limits. Furthermore,the District advised Hawk Industrial Uniform that the District will continue to monitor Hawk Industrial Uniform's discharge, and if another violation occurs,the District will escalate enforcement action. Although Hawk Industrial Uniform continued to wash shop towels and despite continuing to operate without a pretreatment system,39 of 40 onsite samples collected between January 2005 and March 2006 were in compliance. The sole exception s 5 aHaNAd.b ttraMe C0m91ab1091205FRA11 was a TTO discharge violation in October 2005. 4. On March 16, 2006, the District inspected Hawk's facility and discovered that the wastewater from washing machines used to launder shop towels discharged via a trench to a sump, bypassing the designated sample point described in Permit No.2-1-079. A submersible pump in the sump pumped this wastewater through a subterranean pipe,which re-emerged underneath, and was hidden by, a sink on the north wall of the facility. The pipe subsequently penetrated the wall and ran alongside the building, where it discharged to a standpipe. The standpipe discharged directly to a manhole in the street,entirely bypassing the underground clarifier and the designated sample point. A diagram of the bypass plumbing and designated sample point are shown in Figure 1 on the following page. Photos of the corresponding locations are presented in Exhibit F. 5. On March 16,2006, the pump serving the bypass was ordered to be removed from the sump,piping connecfions severed, and the bypass discharge standpipe outside the building capped. The photos are included as Exhibit F. On March 23,2006,the District issued another Order to Cease Violation of Industrial Wastewater Permit Conditions. A copy of the order is presented as Exhibit G. 6. Sampling conducted at Hawk Industrial Uniform following the removal of the bypass resulted in discharge violations of 50%of all samples subsequently collected(7 of 14 samples), as described in Table 2 below. 7. The magnitude and frequency of the TTO and oil and grease violations fallowing termination of the bypass line suggest that Hawk Industrial Uniform's industrial wastewater discharge would have been — in frequent and significant noncompliance without the bypass. B. Based on the configuration of the piping bypassing the designated sample point and non-technically based discharge compliance of over 97%(39 of 40 samples),between January 2005 and March 2006, the District concluded that Hawk Industrial Uniform attempted to avoid representative sampling, and thus after the monitoring data,by bypassing the designated sample point. Table 2 Subsequent Onsite Sampling Violations r Date SOHO@Type Constituent Concentration Over Limit Over LimN Vbraflon Type (Mg/0 m 0511012W6 Grab(2) TTO 1.64 1.06 183 Major ,r 051232006 Grab(2) TTO 11.38 10.80 1962 Major 05232006 Grab(2) 08G 621.70 421.70 211 Major 0512412006 Grab(2) TTO 4.27 3.69 636 Major 0524/M Grab(2) 00 487.10 287.10 144 Major 05125200E Grab(2) TTO Z91 Z33 402 me# 0711WM Grab(2) TTO 1.o9 0.51 88 Major r 6 001 w AdminanNe Cony mt 091206FINAUN FIGURE 1 .. Diagram of Hawk Industrial Uniform Bypass Plumbing (not drawn to scale) YARD sxwrowai HAWK WA AT°' BUILDING INTERIOR �nAca r ur+oa.c.ourm AUOlA a.axnrm WNIEWATIX r oF.aaaN1£n 6NAtP eowr wAsmvArex caw.ww �.. ... ..� .w.anm.mmc Mroa.c.nam� anAas rvwc paovFlaourm� s sr•.wire mA95RWG 19ELOa'GWNDI •.aenrw snua:.r ve .............................. ARMANDO STREET .. 7 ■saw Ama:®eame cnm*wd o51205Flwu■ r r V. BASIS FOR ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS r The District's staff recommends suspension of Hawk Industrial Uniform's wastewater discharge permit and imposition of administrative penalties on Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins,and each of them,based on the following: A. Frequency of Violations r Between January 2005 and March 2006,with an exception of one TTO discharge violation in October 2005, over 97% of all other onsite samples (39 of 40 samples) collected were in compliance. However, since discovery and termination of the bypass on March 16, 2006,the results of sampling conducted between May 10, 2006, and July 10,2006,indicate that 50%of the samples(7 of the 14 samples collected)were in noncompliance. B. Magnitude of Violations The magnitude and frequency of the TTO and 0&G violations following termination of the bypass line suggest the Hawk Industrial Unflorm's industrial wastewater discharge would seldom have been in compliance without the bypass. Concentrations of constituents in violation are as high as 15,000% over the 0.58 mg/I TTO discharge limit,and as high as 370%over the 200.0 mg/I oil and grease limit. C. Altering Monitoring Data r Bypass of industrial wastewater and altering monitoring data constitutes a violation of Sections 501.4 and 604.A.4 of the District's Ordinance and Section II.A.2 and III.E of Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit. ,r Part III.E of Permit No. 2-1-079 states that knowingly rendering any monitoring device or method inaccurate is a crime and may result in the imposition of criminal sanctions andlor civil penalties. D. Impact of Violations on the District's Wastewater Collection and Treatment System Discharge of high levels of Total Toxic Organics and oil and grease, alone or collectively, has the potential to cause pass through that in turn may cause the District to violate its own NPDES permit discharge limit. This can also cause adverse effects including harm to the public health and environment,and contamination of wastewater and biosolids. Oil and grease accumulation in sewer lines is also the primary cause of Sanitary Sewer Overflows(SSO). E. Failure to pay amounts owed to the District Section 604.A.8 of the District's Ordinance specifies that a permit may be suspended when it is r determined that a permittee does not make timely payment of all amounts owed to the District for user charges, non-compliance sampling fees, permit fees, or any other fees imposed pursuant to the Ordinance. To date, Hawk Industrial Uniform owes the District the sum of$96,569.63 for failure to fulfill its financial obligations to pay the invoices and late charges for the use of the District's facilities. r 8 Hawk AditWMMe Compbd 091206FIMM r VI. RECOMMENDATION On March 16, 2006, the District discovered that the wastewater discharged from washing machines used to launder shop towels was pumped through a pipe which discharged directly to a manhole in Armando Street,thereby bypassing the sample box at the end of the underground clarifier. The District concluded that Hawk Industrial Uniform avoided representative sampling, and thus a@ered the monitoring data,by bypassing the designated sample point described in its Permit No. 2-1.079. Bypass of industrial wastewater and altering monitoring data constitutes a violation of Sections 501.4 and 604.A.4 of the District's Ordinance and Section II.A.2 and III.E of Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit. Part III.E of the permit states that knowingly making any false statement on any report or other document required by this permit or knowingly rendering any monitoring device or method inaccurate,is a crime and may result in the imposition of criminal sanctions and/or civil penalties. District staff recommends a minimum thirty(30) day permit suspension of Permit No. 2-1-079, and an administrative penalty of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000)for this violation. In addition, pursuant to California Government Code Section 54740.5 and Section 615.D.7.c of the District's Ordinance, administrative penalties may also be assessed in an amount not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000.00)per violation for each day in violation of any permit condition or requirement issued, reissued,or adopted by the District. For the six(6)TTO and two(2)oil&grease violations detected during onsite sampling conducted since October 2005, the recommended additional administrative penalty is Forty Thousand Dollars($40,000.00). Therefore, District staff recommends that a total administrative penalty of Forty-Five Thousand Dollars ($45,000.00)be assessed against Hawk Industrial Undorm and Rusty Hawkins,and each of them,for violation of the District's Ordinance and Permit No. 2-1-079. In conclusion, pursuant to the authority of California Government Code Sections 54739 at seq., the Clean Water Act(33 U.S.C.Section 1251 et seq.),Sections 604.A.4,604.A.9,and 615.D of the District's Ordinance, the District's staff recommends imposition of a thirty (30) day permit suspension and assessment of administrative penalties in the amount of Forty-Five Thousand Dollars($45,000.00);and user charges, annual invoices, penalties and finance charges due in the amount of Ninety-Six Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Nine 631100 Dollars($96,569.63),jointly and severally on Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins for violations of Permit No. 2-1-079 and the District's Ordinance. The permit suspension shall continue fora minimum of thirty(30)days,and until the total amount of One Hundred Forty-One Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Nine 631100 Dollars ($141,569.63) is received, and until all necessary pretreatment equipment is installed and operation to fully ensure long-term compliance. An administrative hearing will be held on October 24,2006 at 10:00 a.m.at the District's Administrative Office located at 10644 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley to provide Hawk Industrial Uniform and Rusty Hawkins an opportunity to respond to the District's evidence and to be given an opportunity to present evidence as to why the District should not suspend Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit and impose administrative penalties as set forth herein. r ,r ,�, 9 NHawk Ad.,,. We Compt M1091206FINAM EXHIBIT A Hawk Industrial Uniform Industrial Wastewater Discharge Class I Permit No. 2-1.079 Industrial Wastewater Discharge Class I Permit Application m �HawM Adm., trnB a Cmp%:11 N1206FINAI INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE CLASS I PERMIT Permit No: 2-1-079 FOR DISCHARGE OF WASTEWATER ISSUED BY ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT In accordance with the provisions of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations of Orange County Sanitation District, herein referred to as"District", HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. ANAHEIM, CA 92806 hereinafter referred to as"Permittee", is hereby authorized to discharge industrial wastewater from the above identified facility into the District's sewer system in accordance with the conditions set forth in this permit. Such conditions are as specified in the following parts of this permit: Pan 1 - Effluent Limits and Flow Basis Pan 2 - Monitoring,Notification,and Reporting Requirements Peft3 - Standard Conditions Peft4 - Special Conditions Y Compliance with this permit does not relieve the Permittee of its obligation to comply with the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance No. OCSD-01), any applicable pretreatment regulations, standards or requirements under local,State,and Federal laws,including any such regulations,standards, requirements or laws that may become effective during the term of this permit. Non-compliance with any term or condition of this permit constitutes a violation of Ordinance No. OCSD-01. This permit shall become effective on May 01, 2006 and shall expire on April 30, 2008. 1 J Mahin Talebi Source Control Manager Issued on August 10, 2006 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 J PART 1 - EFFLUENT LIMITS AND FLOW BASIS During the period from May 01,2006 to April 30,2008,Pennittes is authorized to discharge industrial wastewater into the sewer system tributary to the District's sewerage facilities. The effluent discharge shall not exceed either the following concentration .. limits in mg/L or the mass emission rate Ilmfts in Ibsiday,based on 23000 gallons per day(gpd)of wastewater flow at the sampling point. Company Name: HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM Permtt No.: 2-1-079 Effective Date: 35/012005 Sewer Address: Flow Baas: 23000 gad Expiration Date: 0 413 02 0 0 6 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. Category. INDUSTRIAL LAUNDRY W WAR Perosm Loss: 0 ANAHEIM.CA 92806 Subcategory. 403 WINAR Fixed Lose: 1.57 r _ Araadc 2.000 2.000 • • 0.384 CN(A) 1.000 1.000 • • 0.192 ■ -:ch ' - 5A00 5.000 - ■. ■ 0.959 a '- Cednlhan 1.000 1.000 ■ ■ 0.192 a CIi1alWren` 2DO6 2A00 a. , • -0.384 a Copper _ 3.000 3.000 ■ a 0.575 i Dl••dv■d:SIiMIdM - -O.SOD 0300: :. a ■_. . 0.096 a Lead 2.ODO 2.000 ■ a 0.384 • r -Mercury -_ OA36 0.030 a a '0.006 i Nickel 10.000 10.000 ■ ■ 1.918 a 0118 Grease Min. -. 200.000 2DD.0110 -. ■ ■ _ . 8.: PCB 0.010 0.010 ■ ■ ■ ■ _ Pesticides 01110 - 0.010 0 ■- - ■ i,- . Silver 5.00D 6.000 ■ a 0.959 ■ d' -Total Sulfides -_ .5DIID:'. 5df00 - a ■- 0.959 ■' - Total Toxic Organics CAN 0.58D a a 0.111 ■ Zinc 10400 10.000 ' . a' - ■ 1.918 -a. pH 6-12 Tr12 ■ • ■ SAMPLING POINT LOCATION: The above effluent limits apply at the sampling point located outside near the boiler and water llealer. The sample point is a sample box and represents all industrial wastewater discharge from the facility. Production-based limes or combined waste formula Cyanide limits apply at the sampling point after cyanide treatment,but prior to dilution with other streams. If mere is no cyanide treatment, the sample must be taken at the and of dre cyanide process before dilution with other process streams. In the absence of cyanide process,the limits apply at the sampling point location described above(end of pipe). e HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM.PERMIT NO.21-079 Page 2 of 13 PART 1 - EFFLUENT LIMITS AND FLOW BASIS During the period from May 01,2006 to April 30,2008,Penalties Is authorized to discharge Industrial wastewater into the sewer system tributary to the District's sewerage facillties. The effluent discharge shall not exceed either the following concentration limits in mg/L orthe mass emission rate limits in lbs/day,based on 23000 gallons perday(gpd)ofwastewaterflowatthe sampling point. Comparry Name: HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM Permit No.: 2-1-079 Effective Data: 0510112006 Sewar Address: Flow Base: 230M gptl Expiration Date: 04=008 r 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. Category: INDUSTRIAL LAUNDRY NN1'AR Percent Lose: 0 ANAHEIM,CA 92a08 Subcategory: 403 Ww'AR Fixed Lose: 1.57 DMHMGE LTMrTS' YY Instantaneous Daily Max 4Day Avg Monty Daily Mat Monthly CONSTITUENT m� mgR- mglL ran lbelday IbAvg Arsenic 2.000 2.000 • • 0.384 11 BOD. • • r' • '.15000... 10000 CN(A) 1.000 1000 • • 0.192 Ckm 5.000 5.000 : . . ■ ■ 0.Tl59 .• Cadmium 1.000 1.000 . • 0.192 ■ Chmmlum 7 2.000 .. 2.000 •., • '0.364 °r Copper 3.000 3.000 • • 0.575 . . . . i:Dissolved Sulfides " 0.500 OS00 • _ • "0.098 • Lead 2.000 2.000 • • 0.3B4 Mercury 0.030 ' - 0.030.' • • 0.006. ■ Nickel 10.000 10.000 • • 1.918 Oil&Grease Min. 200.000 200.000 ■ • a -• r PCB 0,010 0.010 Silver 5,000 5.000 • • 0.959 Total Sulfides 6.000 • ■ 0.959 " •' _ Total Toxic Organics 0.580 0.580 • • 0.111 Zmc - 10.000 10.000 ■ ■ 1.918 •. SAMPLING POINT LOCATION: The above effluent limits apply at the sampling point located outside near the boiler and water heater. The sample point is a sample box and represents all Industrial wastewater discharge from the facility. r Pmduclton-based limits or combined waste formula r Cyanide limits apply at the sampling point after cyanide treatment,but prior to dilution with other streams. Ifthereisnocyanide treatment, the sample must be taken at the end of the cyanide process before dilution with other process streams. In the absence of cyanide process,the limas apply at the sampling point location described above(end of pipe). r HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM•PERMIT NO.21-079 Page 2 of 13 r PART 2-SELF-MONITORING, NOTIFICATION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 1. SELF-MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Permittee shall conduct monitoring of Its own wastewateref luentforthe purpose of determining the status of compliance/non- compliance and user charges, Based on the results,Permittee shall make the necessary adjustments/corrections to bring the wastewater discharge Into Immediate compliance with Its permitted limits. The specific requirements are as follows: A Monitoring/Sampling Requirements From the effective date of the permit and unIll the permit Is terminated or revised,Permittee shall monitor Its wastewater discharge for the following parameters at the indicated frequency: Measurement Parameters. - Sample Type Procedure - - Frequency Metals: None Cyanides: Name Organics: 624 Quarterly Grab minimum of four(4)grab samples which must be individually anal ed Others: BOD Quarterly Composite Composite TSS Quarterly Composite Composite Oil&Grease Min. Quarterly Grab minimum of four(4)grab samples which may be combined by the laboratory personnel nor to analysis Flow(gaVday)3 Ha 'NOTE: To the extent that special conditions in Pert 4 of this permit require more extensive self monitoring,the special conci shall apply. °Sample type is either wmwslre or grab as defined In Ordinance No.OCSD-01 under Section 102. 'Flow and pH should be measured concurrently Win composite sampling for heavy metals. B. Representative Sampling and Laboratory Analyses Samples and measurements taken as required herein shall be representative of the volume and nature of the regulated industrial discharge during hours of production. All samples shall be taken at the sampling point location as designated in this permit. All equipment used for sampling and analysis must be routinely calibrated,Inspected,and maintained to ensure Its accuracy. All sampling and laboratory analyses shall be conducted in accordance with Attachment A. HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM a PERMIT NO.21-079 Page 3 of 13 C. Frequency,Sampling Schedule and Due Dates for Submission of Reports Sampling of wastewater effluent and reporting of results shall be done in accordance with the schedule shown below. Sampling may be performed any day within the specified data range as designated in this permit. If sampling cannot be conducted within the specified date for any valid reason,the District must be no0fied in advance and in wrifing,of the reason(s)for the inability to sample and the new proposed sampling date. 1. Quarterly and Semi-Annual Frequency Deadlines METALS Sampling Date : Report Submllualoq Dw:Date'.: None Bob,TSS - Saroing Data ReportBubmissloo Ode DaOa': Fourth Quarter (Apr 20D6-Jun 2006) June 12•June 23 July 13,2006 First Quarter (Jul 2006-Sep 2006) September 11 •September 22 October 12,2006 Second Quarter (Oct 2006.Dec 2006) December 7-December 19 January 22.2007 Third Quarter (Jan 2007-Mar 2007) March 12-March 23 April 12,2007 wW Fourth Quarter (Apr 2007-Jun 2007) June 11 -June 22 July 12,2007 First Quarter (Jul 2007-Sep 2007) September 10-September 21 October 11,2007 Second Quarter (Oct 2007-Dec 2007) December 10-December 21 January 15,2008 Third Quarter (Jan 2008-Mar 2008) March 10-March 21 April 10.2008 Fourth Quarter (Apr 2008-Jun 2008) June 9-June 20 July 10,2008 >CYgN®SS, Saripl(npzate Report Submission Due Date . ~ None ilio"1d8 . Samping' Report Submisefort.Due Date - Fourth Quarter (Apr 2006-Jun 2006) June 12-June 23 July 13,20M First Quarter (Jul 2006-Sep 2006) September 11 -September 22 October 12,2006 Second Quarter (Oct 2006-Dec 2006) December 7-December 19 January 22,2007 r Third Quarter (Jan 2007-Mar 2007) March 12-March 23 April 12,2007 Fourth Quarter (Apr 2DD7-Jun 2007) June 11-June 22 July 12,2007 First Quarter (Jul 2007-Sep 2007) September 10-September 21 October 11,2007 y Second Quarter (Oct 2007-Dec 2007) December 10-December 21 January 15,2008 Third Quarter (Jan 2008-Mar 20D8) March 10-March 21 Apri110,2008 Fourth Quarter (Apr 2008-Jun 2008) June 9-June 20 July 10,2008 �t OR3S`GRfiASE .. -'. Sempurijbate ReportgubmkUon Dus Ode° Fourth Quarter (Apr 2006-Jun 2006) June 12-June 23 July 13,2006 First Quarter (Jul 2006-Sep 2006) September 11 -September 22 October 12,2008 r Second Quarter (Oct 2006-Dec 2006) December 7-December 19 January 22,2007 Third Quarter (Jan 2D07-Mar 2007) March 12-March 23 April 12,2007 Fourth Quarter (Apr 2007-Jun 2007) June 11-June 22 July 12,20D7 r First Quarter (Jul 2007-Sep 2007) September 10-September 21 October 11,2007 Second Quarter (Oct 2007-Dec 2007) December 10-December 21 January 15.2008 Thlrtl Quarter (Jan 2008-Mar 2008) March 10-March 21 April 10.2008 w. Fourth Quarter (Apr 2g08•Jun 2008) June 9-June 20 July 10,2008 2. Monthly,Weekly,and Dally Frequency Deadlines r a. Samples must be collected in accordance with the requirements specified in Part 2 Section A,as applicable. b. Depending on the sefi-monitonng frequency, sampling must be conducted in the following manner, as applicable: (1) Monthly Self-Monitoring A sample of the wastewater effluent shall be collected and analyzed a minimum of one(1)sampling day HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM s PERMIT NO.21-079 Page 4 of 13 r W per month. The sampling day shall be related to the successively different plant operational day during each month of monitoring. - (ii) Weekly Self-Monitoring W A sample of the wastewater effluent shall be collected and analyzed a minimum of four(4)sampling days per month (once a week). The sampling day shall be related to the successively different plant operational day during each weak of monitoring. (]if) Dally Self-Monitoring A sample of the wastewater effluent shall be collected and analyzed each day of discharge each month. c. Reporting of monthly, weekly, and daily self-monitoring results must be done on a monthly basis. Self- monitoring reports must be submitted by the twentieth(20th)day of the month following sampling. r a.. W r m M ar v< m HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM.PERMIT NO.21-079 Page 5 of 13 w D. Requirements for Reporting Results t. Self-Monitoring Reports s+ Pernittee shall submit a Self-Monitodng Report(SMR)on the date($)specified above.Monitoring results shall be summarized and reported on a District SMR torn. The District will not accept formats other then what Is shown In the SMR fees;therefore,tons provided by the District or replicates must be used for reporting ofresults. Failureto *+ receive the SMR fortes does not relieve Penalties from the obligation to perform the self-monitoring and submit the report on the required date. The SMR forte shall be completely filled-out, with copies of all laboratory results attached. The report shall Indicate the concentration of all pollutants In the effluentforwhlch sampling and analyses were performed, Including water meter readings required for flow measurement. If sampling performed by the a perrnittee Indicates a violation, the pennittee shall notify the District within 24 hours of becoming aware of the violation. 2. Signatory Requirements Prior to submittal of the SMR to the District,the results shell be verified and signed under penalty of perjury,by an authorized company official as defined In 40 CFR 403. v E. Additional Monitoring Requirements In Response to Non-eompllenc$ 1. Resampling s Upon submission of the SMR to the District by the required due date, the District will process the results for mass emission rate calculations,review the concentration results,and notify Penalties ofthe results. Ifthe results indicate that a violation of the applicable concentration and/or mass discharge limits has occurred,a Notice of Violation will e„ be issued and Pennittee must repeat the sampling and pollutant analyses of the required parameters,as specified by the District,within 30 days of issuance of the Notice of Violation. 2. Reporting a. The monitoring results shall be submitted within 20 days of completion of the resampling specified In E.1. b. The requirements for reporting results, as described In D.1 and D.2, shall be followed for the additional monitoring requirements in response to non-compllance. w F. Requirements for Reporting Results of Voluntary Self-Monitoring c' 1. Any voluntary sat-monttoring sample of the el0uent obtained during a 24-hour period from the representative sampling point location Identified in Part 1 of this permit, that is collected and analyzed In accordance with the guidelines shown In Attachment A,constitutes a valid sample. Results of the analysis for all valid samples shall be reported to the District,regardless of the outcome. 2. Set-monitoring results for all valid samples must be submitted using an official numbered Voluntary Set-Monloring Report(VSMR)Forte and received by the District within 30 days from the day the sampling event was concluded. Permitlae shaft obtain the official VSMR Forte from the District,with a unique tracking/Identificaton number for each day of set-monitoring. 3. The District will not consider VSMR Forms received after 30 days from the day the sampling event was concluded. Exceptions to the 30-day submittal policy due to e#enuating circumstances or special situations shall be authorized by the District's General Manager or his/her designee. 4. Upon submission of the completed VSMR Form to the District by the required 30-day due date, the District will evaluate the sample results to determine compliance. If the results indicate that a violation of the applicable V. discharge limits has occurred, a notice of violation may be issued requiring Parades to implement corrective measures. a V. HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM a PERMIT NO.21-079 Page 6 of 13 W. a II. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS a A Perlttee shall comply with the notification requirements set forth In Section 501 of Ordlnanw No. OCSD-01: 1. Notification of Spill and Slug Loading a. In the event Permiltee is unable to wm pty with any permit condition due to a breakdown of equipment, accidents,or human error,or Fertilise has reasonable opportunity to know that his discharge will exceed the discharge provisions of the user's permit, Permittee shall immediately notify the District by telephone. If the material discharged to the sewer has the potential to cause or result In a fire or explosion hanard, Periltee shall immediately notify the local fire department and the District. b. Confirmation of this notification shall be made In writing no later than five(5)working days from the date of the incident The written notification shall state the date of the incident,the reasons for the discharge or spill,what steps were taken to immediately correct the problem,and what steps are being taken to prevent the problem from recurring, c. Such notification shall not relieve the user of any expense,less,damage orother liability which may be Incurred as a result of damage or loss to the District or any other damage or loos to person or property;nor shall such notification relieve the user of any fees or other liability which may be Imposed by a Disbtcfs Ordinance or other applicable law. 2. Notificatlon of Bypass a. Bypass of industrial wastewater to the sewer system is prohlbtted. The District may take enforcement action against the user, unless: (1) Bypass was unavoidable because It was done to prevent loss of fife, personal injury,or severe property damage; a (ii) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass,such asthe use of auxiliary treatinentlecIlibes,retention of untreated wastes,elective slow-down or shut-down of production units or maintenance during periods of production downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate backup equipment could have been feasibly Installed in the exercise of reasonable enginsenng judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred xa✓ during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventative maintenance;and, (III) Perihee submitted notices as required under 2.b. 1Y b. if Perittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass,it shall submit a written request to allow the bypass to the District,If possible,at least ten(10)days before the date of the bypass. c. The District may approve an anticipated bypass at Its sole discretion after considering its adverse effects,and the District determines that the conditions listed in 2.8.(itiii)are met. d. Perittee shall provide telephone notification to the District of an unanticipated bypass that exceeds Its permitted discharge limits within four hours from the time Panties becomes aware of the bypass. A written report shall also be provided within five(5)days of the time Peritiee becomes aware orcould reasonably have been aware of the bypass. The report shall contain a description of the bypass and its reuse;the duration of the bypass,Including exact dates and times,and,if the bypass has not been connected,the anticipated bme it is expected to continue;and steps taken or planned to reduce,eliminate,and prevent recurrence of the bypass. Failure to submit oral notice or written report may be grounds for peril revocation. B. Notification regarding Planned Changes v Perhree shall notify the District 90 days in advance prior to any facility expansion, production Increase, or process modifications which may result in new or substantially increased discharges or change in the nature of the discharge. Perittee shall notify the District In writing of the proposed expansion and shall submit any information requested by the District for evaluation of the affect of such expansion on the Perittee's discharge to the sewer system. r HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM•PERMIT NO.2-1-079 Page 7 of 13 i III. OTHER REPORTING REQUIREMENTS .r AL Slug Discharge Control Plan Permittee shell develop, maintain and implement in accordance with 40 CFR 403.8(i)(2)(v) a Slug Control Plan to respond to spills,emergency bypass and any accidental discharges that may result in a violation of any permit limits or conditions,or may significantly exceed the normal flow to the sewer system or pollutant loading. The plan shall contain detailed procedures to be followed by permthee In responding to a slug discharge at the Permittee's facility. The procedures shall include provisions to eliminate endangerment of human health and safety by containment and clean up of the slug discharge,and prevent any violation of Permittee's discharge limits and the District's Wastewater Discharge + Regulations(Oninances). The Plan shall also provide procedures and facilitate immediate notification ofthe D!Wctofa slug discharge event Perri shall review and update the Slug Control Plan every two years. The Slug Discharge Control Plan,at a minimum,must contain the following: 1. Description of the permlttee's sewer discharge practices Including non-routme batch discharges. + 2. Description of stored chemicals including type and charectensfic,volume, and chemical hazard classification. 3. Procedures to prevent slug discharges to the Sewer system. 4. Description of equipment for responding to slug discharges. 5. Procedures for Inspection and maintenance of the chemical storage areas to assure proper daily handling. 6. A copy of an operation log sheet recording the maintenance performed,volume of spill,and corrective measures taken. 7. Procedures for proper training of key personnel for handling slug discharges. B. Emergency telephone numbers for pmmptiy reporting slug discharges to the appropriate governmental agencies. B. Waste Minimization Requirements w Upon request b the District,Pe"Ithut shall provide waste minimization plans to conserve water,Investigate eq Y P D minima ewaste _ substitution,provide inventory control,Implement employee education,and other steps as necessary to minimize waste produced. C. Water and Tax BIII Submittal Pernittee shall submit to the District,copies of Water and Tex Bills within 30 days of recelpt of such bills. D. Changes In Company Information + Permlftee shall Immediately inform the District of any changes or Inaccuracies in the following company information which is currently on file: COMPANY NAME: PHONE: (714)5308111 LOCAL SEWERING AGENCY: + HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM FA)0 (714)630-4141 CITY OF ANAHEIM MAILING ADDRESS: RESPONSIBLE OFFICER: NO.OF EMPLOYEES: 35 1120 N.ARMAND0 ST. RUSTY HAWKINS + ANAHEIM,CA 92806 PRESIDENT WORK DAYSINEAR: 260 SERVICE ADDRESS: DESIGNATED SIGNATORY: NAI.C.S.NUMBER: 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. LARRY BOOHER B12332 r ANAHEIM,CA 92BOS PROD.MANAGER + E. Falsifying Information Knowingly making any false statement on any report or other document required by this permit or knowingly rendering any monitoring device or method inaccurate,is a crime and may result in the imposition of criminal sanctions andiarcivil + penalties. HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM s PERMIT NO.21-079 Page B of 13 r ,r PART 3-STANDARD CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL PROHIBITIONS Families is required to comply with the general prohibitions and limits on discharges set forth in Article 2 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01 or Its successor. A. Prohibited Discharges 7P B. Prohibition on Dilution C. Prohibition on Surface Runoff and Groundwater D. Prohibition on Unpolluted Water E. Prohibition on Radioactive Wastes F. Prohibition on the Use of Grinders G. Prohibition on Point of Discharge H. Limits on Wastewater Strength and Characteristics I. Prohibition on Medical Waste d J. Prohibition on Disposal of Spent Solutions and Sludges If. CIVIL PENALTIES All users of the District's system and facilities are subject to enforcement actions administratively or judicially by the District, U.S.EPA,State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board,or the County of Orange District Attorney. Any person who violates any provision of Ordinance No,OCSD-01;or any permit condition,prohibition or effluent limitation;or any suspension or revocation order shall be liable civilly for a sum not to exceed$25,000.000 per 10 violation,for each day In which such violation occurs. A. Administrative Civil Penalties d Administrative Civil Penalties may be assessed as follows: 1.) In an amount which shall not exceed two thousand dollars($2,000.00)for each day for falling or refusing to furnish technical or monitoring reports; ~ 2.) In an amount which shall not exceed three thousand dollars($3,000.00)for each day for failing or refusing to timely comply with any compliance schedules established by the District; yr 3.) In an amount which shall not exceed five thousand dollars($5,000.00)per violation for each day of discharge in violation of any waste discharge limit, permit condition,or requirement Issued,missued,or adopted by the District; 4.) In any amount which does not excoed ten dollars(S10.00)per gallon for discharges in violation of any suspension,revocation,cease and desist order or other orders,or prohibition Issued,or adopted by the District 9N III. SEVERABILRY The provisions of this permit am severable. If any provision of those permit limits and/or requirements,or the application thereof,to the Permittee is held invalid,the remainder of the permit limits and/or requirements shall remain In full force and effect. IV. OTHER CONDITIONS A. Pernlbee is requfredto comply with all regulations and discharge limits in Ordinance No.OCSD-01 and any attachments to this permit. B. Except as expressly authorized by the District,upon the sale or trana(erofownarship ofthebusiness for which this permit Is issued,this permit shall be void. The pernittee shall notify the District in writing prior to the transfer of ownership and shall give a copy of the existing permit to the new owner or operator. C. Permits Issued under Ordinance No.OCSD-01 am for a specific user,for a specific operation at a specific location,and create no vested rights. Discharge permits, their concentration limits or their mass emission rates shall not be HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM•PERMIT NO.21-079 Page 9 of 13 Y° transferred for an operation at a different location. D. Pennhtes shall malntaln plant records relating to wastewater discharge and waste manifests for a minimum of three years. PART 4-SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR PERMIT NO.2-1-079 Pennittee shall Implement any and all steps and measures(Including,but not limited to,the Installation of pretreatment equipment/technology,and/or the implementation of best management precticas/pollutlon prevention measures,waste minimization measures,and process modifications)necessary to attain long-term compliance with the pennided discharge limits. ti Y Y ti Y Y Y Y HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM PERMIT NO.2-1-079 Page 1e of 13 Y O ATTACHMENTS s PERMIT NO. 2-1-079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM a p P r W T P T HAWK INDUSTRIAL U4IFORM.PERMR N0.2-1-079 Page 11 of 13 ATTACHMENT A PERMIT NO. 2.1-079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM a. SELF-MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 1. Sampling and Analysis of Heavy Metals a. Composite Sampling. Pernill"shall collect and analyze a 24-hour composite sample of the wastewater effluent for heavy metals at a frequency specified in Part 2 of the permit. All effluent sampling must be conducted using an ti automatic sampling device which is capable of collecting samples at 15-minute intervals during all hours of discharge in 24-hour day. Flow-proportional samples are acceptable with a minimum of 96 samples collected per 24 hours of discharge. For batch dischargers,a grab sample is acceptable for a well-mixed batch,otherwise a composite sample during the period of discharge must be obtained. a b. Discharge Flow. Water meter readings shall be obtained during the startand and of composite sampling to determine the volume of water discharged during the 24-hr sampling period. Meter readings are necessary to determine the total flow needed for calculation of daily mass emission rate for the actual wastewater discharged. Additionally.the start and M stop times must be recorded. The units in which the water meter readings am expressed must be property ascertained. Families shall measure and record daily total flow using flow measurement devices and methods that ensure an accurate measurement of the volume of monitored discharge. The use of effluent meters provides an accurate ,} measurement of the volume discharged; however, in the absence of effluent meters,the Districts accept the use of incoming water meters or process meter totalizers with appropriate standard deductions such as domestic,process,and landscape losses. These deductions will be applied by the Districts,upon processing of the Self-Maniloring report,to determine the volume of wastewater discharged to the sewer system.The devices shall be Installed, calibrated,and maintained to ensure that the accuracy of the measurements am consistent with the accepted capability of that device. c. Laboratory Analyses. All wastewater samples shall be analyzed in accordance with the appropriate procedures contained in 40 CFR 136. Where 40 CFR 136 does not include sampling or analytical techniques for the pollutants in question,analyses shall be performed using the most cumentedition of'Standerd Methods for the Examination of Water "e and Wastewater". Wastewater analysis shall be performed by a laboratory utilizing the approved method for performing the analyses on the required constituents. Upon the Districts'request,Perniitas,shall obtain from their laboratory and furnish to the Districts, information regarding test methods and equipment used, including quality assurance/quality control(ONOC)information. Other information deemed necessary by the Districts to calamine the adequacy,accuracy, ^" and precision of the results may also be required. 2. Sampling and Analysis for Cyanides a. Sampling. Permiltee shall collect and analyze a sample of its wastewateret6uent for cyanides at a frequency specified in Part 2 of the Permit. All sampling for cyanide must be conducted by taking grab samples of the wastewater after cyanide treatment,but prior to dilution with other streams. If there is no cyanide treatment,the samples must be taken at the end of the cyanide process before dilution with other process streams. A minimum of four grab samples shall be taken independently during hours of operation within a 24-hour period. The grab samples may be composited by the laboratory personnel prior to analysis. Proper sampling and preservation techniques in accordance with EPA requirements must be used to ensure representative sample results. b. Laboratory Analyses. All wastewater samples shall be analyzed for cyanides in accordance with the appropriate procedures contained in 40 CFR 136 using EPA Methods. Wastewater analysis shall be performed by a laboratory uIllizing the approved method for performing the analyses on the required constituents. Upon the Districts'request, Pennittee shall obtain from their laboratory and furnish to the Districts,information regarding test methods and equipment a used,including QA/OC Information. Other information deemed necessary by the Districts to determine the adequacy, accumcy,and precision of the msufls may also be required. v+ HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM•PERMIT NO.21-079 Page 12 of 13 7" 3. Sampling and Analysis for Total Toxic Organics(TTO) >N a. Sampling. Permitiee shall collect and analyze samples of the wastewater effluent at the sample point for TTO at a frequency specified in Part 2 of the permit. All effluent sampling for volatile organic compounds must be conducted by taking grab samples of the wastewater effluent. A minimum Of four grab samples shall be taken independently during hours of operation within a 24-hr period. Each sample shall he analyzed Independently for toxic organic constituents present in the facility. The average concentration from the four grab sample results with concentrations greater than 10 pg/L shall be used to determine compliance with TTO mass emission end/or concentration limits. W b. Laboratory Analyses. All wastewater samples shall be analyzed in accordance with the appropriate procedures contained in 40 CFR 136 using EPA Methods(i.e.,for Purgeable Halorarbons and Aromatics, use Methods 601 and 602,or 624). Wastewater analysis shall be performed by a laboratory utilizing the approved method for performing the analyses on the required constituents. Upon the Districts' request, Permltiee shall obtain from their laboratory and furnish to the Districts,information regarding test methods and equipment used,including QAIQC Information. Other information deemed necessary by the Districts to determine the adequacy,accuracy,and precision of the results may also be required. 4. Sampling and Analysis of SOD and TSS a. Composite Sampling. Pernitme shall collect and analyze a 24-hour composite sample of the wastewater effluent at the sample point for SOD and TSS at a frequency specified in Part 2 of the permit All effluent sampling must be conducted using an automatic sampling device which is capable of collecting samples at 1 Sminute intervals during all hours of discharge in a 24-hourday. Flow-proportlonal samples are acceptable with a minimum of 96 samples collected per 24 hours of discharge. For batch dischargers,a grab sample is acceptable for a well-mixed batch, otherwise a a composite sample during the period of discharge must be obtained. b. Discharge Flow. Water meter readings shall be obtained during the start and end of composite sampling to determine the volume of water discharged during the 24-hr sampling penod. Meter readings are necessary to determine the total d flow needed for calculation of daily mass emission rate for the actual wastewater discharged. Additionally,the start and stop times must be recorded. The units in which the water meter readings are expressed must be property ascertained. Permitiee shall measure and record daily total flow using flaw measurement devices and methods that ensure an accurate measurement of the volume of monitored discharge. The use of effluent meters provides an accurate measurement of the volume discharged; however, in the absence of effluent meters, the Districts accept the use of incoming water meters or process meter totalizers with appropriate standard deductions such as domestic,process,and landscape losses. These deductions will be applied by the Districts,upon processing of the Self-Monflonng report,to determine the volume of wastewater discharged to the sewer system.The devices shall be installed, calibrated,and s� maintained to ensure that the accuracy of the measurements am consistent with the accepted capability of that device. c. Laboratory Analyses. All wastewater samples shall be analyzed in accordance with the appropriate procedures contained in 40 CFR 136 using EPA Method. Wastewater analysis shall be performed by a laboratory utilizing the approved method for performing the analyses on the required constituents. Upon the Districts'request,Permittee shall obtain from their laboratory and furnish to the Districts, information regarding test methods and equipment used, including QA/QC information. Other information deemed necessary by the Districts to determine the adequacy, accuracy,and precision of the results may also be required. 5. Sampling and Analysis for Oil and Grease(08G) a. Sampling. Pernitee shall collect and analyze samples of the wastewater effluent at the sample point location farO&G at a frequency specified in Part 2 of the permit A minimum of four grab samples shall be taken independently during hours of operation within a 24-hour period. The grab samples may be composited by the laboratory personnel prior to analysis. Propersampling and preservation techniques,in accordance with EPA requirements,must be used to ensure .� representative results. b. Laboratory Analyses. All wastewater samples shall be analyzed In accordance with the appropriate procedures contained in 40 CFR 136 using EPA Method. Wastewater analysis shall be performed by a laboratory utilizing the approved method for performing the analyses on the required constituents. Upon the Districts request,Pennines,shall obtain from their laboratory and furnish to the Districts, information regarding test methods and equipment used, including QA/QC Information. Other information deemed necessary by the Districts to determine the adequacy, accuracy,and precision of the results may also be required. T V. HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM•PERMIT NO.2.1-079 Page 13 of 13 P I_ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTW RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR CLASS I WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT 0 L RK.Mlinal Instructions Version 5.0 a greeter of Acrobat,Acrobat Approval,or Acrobat Reader must be used or else a blank form will be one result Click on'Help,About ro cardrin your version. AcmbM Reader is in the Vnnd dWctay m Otis CD. From se Main Meng pease click on'using this program,than'using the permit names es application wrbef,and read 'no,me capabilm'poor to using this form. L For the Orange County Seoul District(District)to process and Issue a Clete I WaskweNr DiacMrge Permit,the applicant must campy with all of are following: r The Permit Renewal Application Form must be filled out completely. The District will rot presses incompba submittals, and your application will be returned 8 there is any missing information. Do rot leave Menke. Please write"NIA"t thou I_ irdormetion being requested done not apply. k The Permit Renewal Application mustbe signed by the Responsible Dancer or Designated Signatory,as defined on pages 6 and 7. The Dwi id will return your pwrrit application ff R is not signed by the proper company official. I_ s The permit fee must be remftd at the time the permit renewal application is suhNlbd. Your rerNlmnce,nest be not directly to the Dbtricrs Accounting Department and,a photocopy of the cheek must be submitted with the Parma Renewal Application to to Source Control invasion. An application received without Nis docomentetdn will be re4arhed. I_ Plmm later to Section A of the nfimmu n brochure for detailed interactions for canpbtbp this Application Form. LOwnership Information Tab through and mouse over letters A-Z for help completing each line A Applicant Rusye Duets Tovol Inc,DBA Hawk Industrial Untonrs 2-1-079 CanpeseLso CmWre Nam Pend No. I_ B Aspire Adorers 1120 Ardndo St ,Anaheim Ca 92806 Sinew Cdy Sloe 1p Coda C Sewer service I_ Address 1120 Amarrdo St Anaheim Cis 92806 MW 'I D Phone Number ( 714 ) 6308111 Fmr Number ( 714 ) 6304141 I_ E Company Website(it any): MpII aws.hmakunifornu.cam I_ F Isyourbusinesa Qa carporalmT QpaMer"? 0sobproprbbrship7 OLbrdted L'sbibly Corposixi Lid all Prindpekl0enere8Aajor shareholdgs of� psbas7 swiveled J u -. This� od tla _ �� Ralph Hawkins o S LL44 Pr'LG f+✓+lrL T I_ NaeardTie L Addm Alas and ion I_ ....�..- nrr -ate.► � r - s r�} Phone and TW Andrew For corpornore only: r I, 9�. year a unbar G Are you the Qe landowner! or O team? H a ksma, include the name, address,and nlephone number of the _ property owner anchor the manager of the property: Check om: Downer 0 Manager Ralph Hawkins amp, ANUM Nave Atrlea `t/� Page 1 of 11 �- -7/S Tab through end mouse Over leden:A-Z for help completng each line I� Manufacturing Process Information H Desatpton of 9 menufedWN Procesees andbr eavice actwities an the Premises,wet a dry, P'iea:e idently and deso be the processes which generate Wastewater In mars detg. (Use additional sheet If naesswy.) (— Washing Twtfes I.. I— I oest #m are werepe gimntlty of raw ma4rfals used or handled: (Jae additional sheet If naoessety.) Soap kl.. I- Ir J Description of product menufacWed a Produced as a reodt of servcm pafwmed:(Use aftbonal sheet If necessary.) Shids,Pant,Towet,A4Eft — I— K Average Dafly Production: Tan Ham f— L Nath Mnorican Indusby Ctssifcatan System (NAICS)Code(this cede replaced the di=fined SIC Code): Prarary NAICS Code: 7218 Secondary IMCS Code(s): Page 2 of 11 I— L Tab through and(,. se Over letters A-Z for help completing each lone LOperations Information M Operating Schedule: LWeber of ddlte po wok day: 1 Nwrba dwak days pervadL 5 rkunter of Pradiatim de/a pa yr 260 Average venter of onpkryeas per shift tie: 35 2a: 3". Total 35 L PmdL fon tuns W SW 10 2": r Test 10 Dwchwge bore Per ddR 1• 1^d 3•. Toot 0 L N YAen old yea stat op 96 atis ferldv? More, APr11 year. 1994 O For Industries r wtved in SlefeoelMetal FhlshMg(pmig a ft%poop nM ddarQ F B na.bMft,dc): Do you own more Than 50%(area base)of the materials urdaigomg production? .O WA O Yes ONO L P Have you made any addrdo s or nedgw3ons to he manulechuing process during the past two years? O Yes O No Hthe answer is Wee",you must submit updated Manufacturing Process Layout,Manufacturing Proeeas Flow Diagram,and Spill Containment Drawings and Information with this application. LPlease desabe or"the Roces changes dung the test perraft perod L LInformation on Treatment of Industrial WasteMastewater O Is any form of vre;>m'wasteweta beahnent precticed at h's fecW OYes O No Lff Me answer is'Yea.provide the following infomnrtion by chedchg the Wmp vde boxes: . Modeof0pemtion: OCcntNaous OBotch OBob L . Pretroannemunlis Used: ❑Hydmdde Pmcpitation ❑F➢er Rena ❑Coss,F Fbation(e.g.,Manitek) L HmmvaW Ctronie Reduction Fhal Polishing FilterSawpaon Fna(e.g.,Lency) Cyanide Desewm ti Spent Chem!®I Treatment UnitAkmuoan Chip ❑Equarmton OBebwpound CWiher ❑Ozone Treatnent Reaft [:]PH AdrysMent [:]fan Exchange ❑ChriferAemello Setahg L ❑ElectrowirmingrPlate-out Units ❑other R How are spent chan eals handled? Specify the,nethod for'OMe:' ❑Wasloharaed otshe ❑Batch tasted orate ODischagatl fo sewer without teatnenl ❑other S Weshnuater Operafor/Mairdunance Intmmetion: NuTba of westowater pretesenent operators at your fadf .f. 10 shift _ 2b sNH 3w Stdft Ouallflcaton(Pleaseclencirl L Operator Name WastawmarTmairrend0paraftDrWith AAS®®Wh BSChaialor BShdaa Nne CWEACeN¢emn .2—ness Ereuweieg nsenreQ Oede 1 Oade 2 G.J.314 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is there an Operabon and Matltenanne Manual a two,ewe, --, ator heetrerl ? O Yes ONO 1 Page 3 of l l v Tab through anu.,,ouse over raters A-Z for help completing each line Information for Determining Volume of Wastewater Discharge and User Charges T Assessor Pmcel Number(s)W shown an property tax Ur 34438208 A If a Lessee,please mdicate: (a) percentage of popery tax all paid to landowner. % (b) percentage of water bill paid to landowner. % (t) queue footage of leased Was, sO raOt (d) whether yea or9fty Is a part of a commerciaLfindaaQlal complex: Oyes O' No Y V Water Supplier CltyofMehehn Water Account Numba(s): 5&eSY -%S""1 Other SaurcBa of Wetar StppM ❑crate web ❑gmuMwalar "beaten ❑Others W Wei Meashuernent lnlanna on: List an wabu meters at your leclflty.Compote Attachment A In accordance with Instructions. -� From bee nccming meter(s)iderrIffied on Attachment A chi which o;lawing w81g measurement strategy is used: OCty wad meter(s)a* OProrea meffils)ordy OShop mafa(s)omit O Both city meter and process meets The meor(s)Medud above reassume: 0 ONy the mwNng water going to the applicants ocay. OThe lettering weer to the a}picarhYs tecTty end for other coneenos adjacent e Does your fecilty use an elbort meter to measure the Mistrial wastewater cisctalge7 OYs (j)NO If so,does the etYuert mein m ware Mg the industrial westewale discarged to the sera from the facility(e:dudmg .. sanitary,bDHw blowdovm,caolmg tower Wesel off.and R0.rgect)? OYes ONo Hynrls6.yumn a rmm'sanrd rteler sW m ILo Y �. x In order to datenrine mass en3slen rates and user charges,the eMal volume of water dsdharged to the sewer mug be c onled For facilities that do not have effluent meters,his is done by determining the volume of morning water, as betai by the My water meter,and then appyhg appop®ta mductons for water losses. If losses=not be quantified,the Dealt wd a)yly wale bass equivalent to 5%of the bvanmg water. it Is to yam advantage to determine and Wa"lase bass If Your lac5y hs water losses nee tan 5% Posse Mork t e grproptate box halwv. OApp4y5%Ios OUaecalodaodms t plofated lam is ndcao4 dele erne erg appl®Ns loses using the wvrlaheet provided In Attachment B and severer®reams in to le"below. The wvlxhest and supporting documentation must be submitted or terse bases to be applied. v lam Average ONY lVater Lauer GaVdq Lou Is spoable to CRY miai I Preraa Maker I Lmdcape I how losses 54I ❑ ❑ II Baker l®str saan condenses not returned to baker �„ ❑ ❑ III Coding beer ear evaporation ❑ ❑ IV Rodud mats IP I ❑ ❑ V Meeb®s ❑ ❑ s ❑ ❑ TOW loan ri Check flea abara a applicable. Page 4 of 11 I_ Tab through and nwse over letters A-Z for help completing each rim Certification for Accuracy of Information I.. I h9w personally examined and am lamtiar wilh this information submitted m this appGitatan and required attachments,and I harabycerb y underpenelty oflew that the submitted information is true,accurate,and complete. _ I am aware that More are significant panafties for submitting false information, including the possibddy of fine and imprsonnrerR 1 also authorize the ftbrid to verify 0 imbmrstion provided, indudM the water eaaunf/usepe intaratbn from the watersupprier,fscildy lease cormada,and otherpamnerd information. _ I cedily that upon issuance of the permit that this firm's operation and its resultant wastewater discharge will achieve mrsisterd canpliarce wilt the Distridk Ordnance and applicable Federal wastewater discharge requirements. If the wastewaterdscharge does not meet all the apprcebme regulations,the company will moldy manufacturing I_ equipment tun tproduction,fiord ddustrsl waste disdharge,mste0 waslewaterprebealmerd equipment ordb whatever is legalynecessavy to meet discharge requirements. I_ Y Responsble 0ffic most et Slgnamry as spedfied ages6 and 7): I_ Na ro: vi I_ rhie Yre��cd�sT I_ Defer: c� to lob bred I_ I. z Name of Ter person to cmlact concarrng nlor abon prmnded n Nis application: ITS: e e mwa I_ Nmre I_ Address. Title: I_ Phone: I_ moo: I_ Page 5 of 11 I_ THIS IS MANDATORY. Complete and rotum this form. Certification of Responsible Officer 1, the undersigned, do hereby cedify that I meet the definition of a Responsible Officer, as outlined below- A responsible officer Is defined as follows: 1. For a corporation: .. a A president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of the principal business functions, or any other person who performs similar policy- or decision-making functions for the corporation, or b. The manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operation facilities employing =to then 250 persons or having gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding $25 million (in second-quarter 1980 dollars), it authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager In accordance with corporate procedures, 2. For partnership or sole proprietorship, a general partner or proprietor, respectively. I accept the msponsib/aty for the overall operation of the fedfity an Nor overall responalbOdy, for compliance with all regulatory requirements for the facility than which the wastewater discharge originates. I understand that ir, in the Mum, this Information is no longer correct, the District will be notified in writing to establish a new ROT si Is Officer Name of Responsible Officer w fF+�erJ T1r �J e r reel Signal Date O D Title r' 1�/, E-mail address Company Name 6— '1' Pemdt No. NOTE: All correspondence regarding permit onforcemerrt, and sell-monitoring Issues (e.g., Self-Monitoring Forms and Reminder Lenora, Noticos of Violations, permit Application, etc.) shall be sent to the Responsible Officer or to the Designated Signatory if property authorized. If them Is a change In the Responsible Officer or Designated Signatory In the future, the Districts must be notHkd in writing and the appropriate form must be submitted. Page 6 of 11 i �fATTACHMENT (This form moat be completed manually) ONSITE WATER METER INFORMATION Ir REQUIRED INFORMATION: Complete the ONSITE WATER METER table for at.water meters at your facility. Meter Type Digits Fboad ZOMBI T.ev Units 111111111. Location ❑Cdy ❑Process �f OCu F[ ❑X 10 -'c rLc- AeH+cnwrU�� Si ❑Shop ❑Effluent D Fj 0 ❑G'd'= ❑X 100 f ❑M 0 oroomai ❑CIL Ft ❑X10 ` ❑Shop ❑Effluent ❑Gallons ❑X 100 ❑Cty ❑Process ❑Cu.FL 0X10 ❑Shop ❑Effluent ❑De9ons ❑X 100 ❑(Xy, ❑Process ❑Cu.Ft ❑X10 ❑Shop ❑Effluent ❑Gallons ❑X 1DO L OQy ❑Process ❑CU Ft. ❑X 10 ❑Shop 0 Effluent ❑CM%M ❑X 100 ❑Qy ❑Process ❑Cu Ft OX10 ❑ ❑EMueat ❑Odom I OX100 INSTRUCTIONS L STEP 1. Please identify for each Orsite WaberMeter at your facility. Meter type-Use the ollamng desenptbns to charactenze your meter type(s). The City Meier s typically found outside at ant be ings The mete type, Mined by the water puveysr(city or owl agency), 'a used toL marine iron""water for potable, serpay, landscepirg, and fndusere uses The readings(con thane meters are used to deem me the charges on the monthly or bFmonthy water bEb. The Process Meter is located downstream of ell din", sanitary, end landmOng uses. wn w Process mews are typically instabod to detemins water usage tospecific Indusbiao lfl l prs. The Eard Mohr reo ds the actual volume of wastamter cischmged by tie facility and is typically boated at the ftchsge port war the designated sanpe pent. The O.C. L Sentaton Dstrt1 may require an effluent meter o detemnae dewy flows for co pitamw vedfiwtlmt and/or to establish amoate sewerage savior charges. The Shop Meter is often found In a mul0ampanq oduabal strp dud does nst lave odnidal city rrelas for each suite. landlords who do ant want to pay to water big or a significant water user often tvatan a meta on the outside of the stop. It s dstnipal ed from the process rwffi in that it also motors the potable and sanfay flow,blue a riy meter. The water purveyor does not hill to user directly L for wwtar usageter metered by a shop meter. The andaE M)frequently foal the renter directly,based upon the shopmeterlum me volumes.. • Digits/Fixed ZeroeRenths- Use the Digits, Flied Zeros, and Tenths columns to record the current meter reading. Include the beginning digits, even If they are zero, as well as, the faced zeros, or tenths designated by the arrow L sweep. Please vtsualty road each meter. Do net provide values or volumes from the water bills. Use to olowmi; the guicalmes for Fond Zeros and Tanta to povide assstaxe with reading and receding the ofamotion for several common meter vanatons. Flowd Zems-On many Mate meter modes the mveepag atou records nurhercal units that air designated by L the bad taw on ft Inflater readout Use to three shaded columns; designated Fbad Zeos to m o meters that t arrow sweep 1. sigie(D-9)cbg dmAe(10-90)dglL a trple(100.9D0)cio vahrm Tenths-On many water mew models to dal narbes (saWad try to snow sweep).a the feat dgd al a otsher readout doW, s s tenths of a gallon. Usa the onto wham (mp'ied by to deans)poa�o odwte oe meta hewn emta of a gagun. L • Units/Multipiler- Indicate the meter units, Cubic Feet (Cu. Ft) or Gallons. If applicable, Indicate the multiplier factor(x 10 or x 100). Do not confuse this with the typical billing una(100 OF)on the monthly water bfll. Unts-Most wear rwtels regsffi tre where a water m ether aEs feet a geaahs Please adceo t you meter uses a dfteant and of rteasureneat such as boccie,aces neftm or acre int Mutfplier-Occasionally the meter dal wil odwo tat a multiplier(X 10 a X 100) mat be appaed In to toafmar readng (os feature is more common on elactordc fav instruments). Pease indicate difemt multiplier factors as appkaNe. I� Location - Briefly describe the location of each meter. Desoptive tams end location relow such es wbskle, street vault, north side of buil". aside to process area, adjacent to the dnei ay,on to east wan,etc.,will at help as fed stet vety the afamaton by u9 vial reference point. LSTEP 2. Attach a copy of the latest water bill for each city meter idenlifred. Page 8 of 11 I� (This form must be complatad manually) I„ ATTACHMENT B ITEMIZED CALCULATION OF WATER LOSSES („ Losses refer N the incoming water used that does not go to the sewer. This includes water used (or landscapinghnigation, water evaporeted from cooling towers, water evaporated from boilers in which (_ condensate is not returned to the boiler, water evaporated from heated tanks or processes, wash water going to the storm dram. water actually added to your predict or any other processes where water does not go to the sewer. Calculate the losses as shown below. I. LANDSCAPEnRRIGATION LOSSES I® Square Footage of x Loss Factor Nummeollhipper Landsape Lossea Landscapatl Nee(fF) 25 galls;flyyr. Year geVdey (r x 25 385 ,� , 7jj I' IL BOILER LOSSES FROM STEAM CONDENSATE NOT RETURNED TO BOILER 1 �r BeliefFiaraepoxer based on x Lass FactNr x No.of Cpal'ebr9 IkdkL sses 80%of6o0ef rs8ng 3.8 geMrlhp hoursldey geVdey 90 x 3.6 x y O I� III. WATER EVAPORATION LOSSES FROM COOLING TOWERS Tonnage Loan Factor Number of Cowerslon Coo" hundred design lore x 2.SgWhWt00 x Operetlng x Factor Tows Lassos .. design law hours" 80larft galiday x 2.5 x 10 x 80 = I� la. I� I� I� Page 8 of I I� (This tam,must he completed manually) ATTACHMENT B ITEMIZED CALCULATION OF WATER LOSSES (Canrtnuaaon) IV. WATER INTO PRODUCT(Plena show calculations and submit back-up documentation.) 'DQye2 1,05se5 - K 1 b , c�(: ILNGE "aw5 0,6 Pc` o6 w445?z is LruAPo9A-TZFJ�- A,e 47VI -/ Pov-d d✓yed , " VjA-ti-ne be-NSIry �eK 6s��i�y 0,6 V. OTHER LOSSES (Please show ealcuNUons and submit back-up documentation.) �rC PVC� I V)0 X zf = 7 Zito C,AIION S/pe.,r yecaic 6 p P/Le 0,,c.:7poN D,475 = 3 O GAIIW✓ P& ye-*f- W.AsH -with A werLI-tC 110 PeK TP,,. K v. MzN zz 60110,.;5L .eeioy 2ZO - 4C� 6F,4/(0,J5 a Par to ct" HAWK INDUSTRIAL( FORM uMax Pn// 7F CAUFOPKIA 252• 1120 N.ARMANDO S'i HEET DMOEA AVE.CA ax9e0 ANAHEIM.CA 92MB 1042/1220 (714)630-0111 6R9f1006 - ORUEROFE Orange Co®ty SEUMMa Distriet I $rr1,570.00 4 . Om TLORt®d Fin Hm*ed 3evmty ad OW100murmoroorwrr.u000rrrrrrrrsmrrrrwuurrourworor DOLLARS i P.O.BOX 6127 Fountain Valley,CA 9270&7018 AIRNOPtDD 01ONATIPE Ir IF02524811a 1: 1 2 2000 4 961. 2042021.84311a I_ XAWKINDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 252 _-- Orange County SaoitmicnDistrict 6R92006 DenType Refamee Od&W AM. Bel,Due Discount PeYWAM 03//042006 Bun Permit fees 1.570.00 1,570.00 1,570.00 Cho*Amount 115110.00 I_ I� _u CD M I_ :a CD , m n I� General-Union Bank-He vi �? r'9.s7o.ao 0 I_ HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 252 O+Mlge Caumty SaIntetim District 629fl006 Date Type Refeceme Ori4ond AOL Balsams Duo Diamond Payment I� 031IOrM Bill Imenitfee's 1s7D.00 1,570.ChakAmami 1.570.00 I� Im 1, I� I� G,,mal•Union Baok-Ha 1,570.00 .a n W WVNIJ90U60 ILMd=0 aB"...PY WH. a. ;uiod 6uildweg paieu6isaa ayj jo s4dej60104d wjo}iun ieijlsnpul AmeH 8 IIGIHX3 t,. Hawk Industrial Uniform designated sample point, 3/16/2006 MYNIANZ160 W uldwD3 enOMUWV Mau■ ^. aauepuodsaijo:) pue saaionul ona ;sed waomun lepisnpul XmeH .. 3 1181HX3 1 + 1 . 1 - 1 - 1 a 1 - 1 a 1 = 1 s l n, I o f s l r l - l 1 = I w l 1 m 1103842010 omrg CO ty S.rO®Ilon DRt. O9U1U6 13]8:03 4XSDMIl NRDeWft MNA91W Pe99- 1 A91n0 OeN O9111108 Compairy: MIS C.O.Scrspwrn ......_,.Oowm.nL...__.. ft 9b 0ue0.w Ty Number 0empmry Item Dam Cb D.N OrI9M.l Amount op"M m Culr.nl _ 46-90 91-180 _ IBt-305 368-999 omr W9 -_ Cusbm.r. 2488T 11.M bWuebLl UnBNm R .Number: 1 1 Cmdit UmO tmum Cratlll Lim. R4 5149W MIS 000 tWIM 1L15U5 12.17646 12.175,49 12.17540 R4 9049M =15 000 MIMS 12/15835 0.038.21 6,038.21 6.038.21 M WS360 =is WO Imam 12115135 16.236.89 16,236.69 16,236.80 R4 90.SBW M015 OW IWIM5 1N1SU5 0,33997 6,33917 8,339,67 R4 31376 00015 00112119105 1L19U5 1,0000o 1,000.00 1000.00 M Stan 00015 Gal Iv19U5 /2)19U5 W392 603A2 603.62 M 31378 00015 0011DIMS 12119IU5 1.00100 1,0W.W 1,000.00 R4 31379 00018 001 1L19N5 1L19N5 63397 833.97 em,91 R4 SISSW =16 00012Ta1M5 ON14U8 12.11548 12,11S.66 12,IT646 RF 31529 00015 001 DIWO13 OWIMG 417.15 417.15 417.15 RF 31711 MIS 001 OLOWB MIME 741.46 741.46 741.46 R4 31WT MIS WA WASI00 WIO]NS A.M.90 1000.00 1.000,0 RF 3190 =15 DOI 03 08 WlWS 76203 762.03 762.03 R4 32023 M15 OD1 OWIM8 0WIM 157.00 15700 15T.00 M SISM MIS OW mime MIS" 12,1T546 12,1T646 12,175.46 RF 33312 MIS 0010510N08 OBI16108 1.m 6B 1,8%.60 1.068.88 R4 32356 MIS 00105118418 05110M 1.000.00 tOaoo0 1,000.00 RF 32513 MIS NJ MMOS OTp20U6 1,107]1 1197.71 1,10111 M 5162W M15 00008WMS ON14MB 12,175A6 12,17546 12.175.46 RF 32726 MIS 001 OTNLOS MIMS 1.013.W 1,013.W 1.013.W R4 32MB MIS 0010910]IOB O9OZ0 119.TT 119.n 119.TT RF 32009 09015 W1 MOV(19 MIMS 1,140.13 1.140.13 1.140,13 R4 33017 OW15 001 MIMS MOMS 1,WO.CO 1,000.00 1,000.00 RF 33129 MIS W1 M U6 1of20U8 1,39956 1.3W.% 1,30B.5fi crt, m r. M91 Newt ln9vetrhl 00.669.63 W,569.63 �— 3.09,46 13.189.40 16,39895 63.32392 Unlbrm _ 18,386.05 6],J2392 COmp.mg Sam Co04o8onsyNom W,599.03 W.599.03 3,659,46 13,189.40 I t t t t t t t t t t [ ! t t t t t t M381SO1S Orange county 5anibtlon DIM. OgM7= 13:36D3 00500001 Pitt DeWhaa Aging Page- I Company: Cn9eUlmi Straiten Aging Dale O9 M6 ..........D.oument......... Im.in Due D.W Ty Numbar Umpmry ham Data CIe1*0e1. OdgbuYMwaN ppa.pmmtnt Durmm_ M-BD 91-180 151-us M-999 N.,999 QmM Tolel BB.BBBA] BeSBg.B] 96%.40 13.1N gg 1B.3gGAS &MIR Orange County Sanitation District P.O.Box 8127 ,J Fountain Valley,Caieomis 92728-8127 PHONE:(714)962-2411 b n7 FAX: (714)9623954 J Invoice Date: 12/19/05 Invoice No.: 31376 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 12/19/05 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 ..i Anaheim CA 92806 .r J ORIGINAL INVOICE INVOICE DUE r DATE NUMBER DATE - - DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 12/19/05 31376 12/19/05 10% Penehy on Invoice 514984 11000.00 r r J y r r r `•• Plww Note Due Date ••• •• 10% Penahv on Past Due Amount •• r Total Amount Now Due 11000.00 r rI Orange County Sanitation District P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,California 9 27 28-81 2 7 PHONE: 17141962-2411 FAX: (7141962-3954 Invoice Date: 12119/06 Invoice No.: 31377 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 12/19/05 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 �+ ORIGINAL INVOICE { INVOICE DUE r� DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT -- -NUMBER DATE 12/19/05 31377 12/19/05 10% Penalty on Invoice 904920 603.82 a ••• Please Note Due Date '•• •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• Total Amount Now Due 603.82 Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,California 92728-8127 r PHONE:(714)962-2411 b �+ FAX: (714)962-3954 E� � E r Invoice Date: 12/19/05 r Invoice No.: 31378 ' Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 12M9105 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24M Anaheim CA 92806 1'r ORIGINAL INVOICE DATE INVOICE DUE: NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT _I 12/19/05 31378 12/19/05 10% Penalty on Invoice 905350 1,000.00 �I rl J J i ji '•' Please Note Due Date ••• ,r •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount " Total Amount Now Due 1,000.00 rl Orange County Sanitation District P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley.California 92728.8127 PHONE: (714)962-2411 FAX:I71419823964 Invoice Date: 12119/05 Invoice No.: 31379 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 12119105 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 J ORIGINAL INVOICE 1 DATE INVOICE DUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT rl NUMBER .DATE 12/19/05 31379 12/19/05 10% Penalty on Invoice 905689 833.07 1 1 ••• Please Note Due Date ••• •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• '� Total Amount Now Due 833.97 Orange County Sanitation District P.O.Box 8127 Foumein Valley,CeMomle 92728.8127 PHONE: (714)962-2411 lx + FAX: (714)962.3954 Invoice Date: 01/02/06 Invoice No.: 31529 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 02116/06 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24697 Anaheim CA 92806 ORIGINAL INVOICE 1 INVOKE DUE rt DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NUMBER ...DATE * 01/02/06 31529 02116/06 Finance Charge 417.15 a �1 J ••• Please Note Due Data ••• " 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• Total Amount Now Due 417.15 Orange County Sanitation District Q P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Calllomia 92728-8127 PHONE: 1714)962-2411 C7 u� FAX: (714) 962-3954 Invoice Date: 02/01/06 Invoice No.: 31637 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 03/18/06 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 J ORIGINAL INVOICE 1 INVOICE DUE J DATE :NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 02/01/06 31637 03/18/06 Permit Fee Renewal #2-1-079 1,570.00 1 I eJ 1 ar •'• Please Note Due Date '•' r •• 10% Penalty an Pest Due Amount Total Amount Now Due 1.570.00 r r aOrange County Sanitation District ?? P.O.Box 8127 Foumain Valley. CaBromia 92728.8127 PHONE: 1714)902-2411 F7 FAX:(714)962-3954 Invoice Date: 02/02/06 Invoice No.: 31711 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 03/19/06 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 a ORIGINAL INVOICE INVOICE DUE. DATE NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 02/02/06 31711 03/19/06 Finance Charge 741.46 J J J J J J *•• Please Note Due Date ••• •' 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• JTotal Amount Now Due 741.46 J 1 Orange County Sanitation District I P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CaMomie 927284127 PHONE:(714)962.2411 b eo FAX: (714)962-3954 w I Invoice Date: 02/16/06 r Invoice No.: 31847 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 04/02/06 rI 1120 N. Armando St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 rI I ORIGINAL INVOICE r INVOICE DUE ` r DATE NUMBER . . DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT I 02/16/06 31847 04/02/06 10% Penalty on Invoice 515394 1,0DO.00 r r' r� r� rI r� r' '•• Please Note Due Date ••• r •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amoutn •• Total Amount Now Due 1,000.00 rl rl J Orange County Sanitation District 9 P.O. Be. 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 PHONE: (714)962.2411 b w FAX: 1714)962-3954 Invoice Date: 03/02/06 Invoice No.: 31953 J Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 04/16/06 1120 N. Armando St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 J ORIGINAL INVOICE DATE INVOICE DUE NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 03/02/06 31953 04/16/06 Finance Charge 762.03 J �i J J ••• Please Note Due Date ••• " 10% Penalty on Peet Due Amount •• Total Amount Now Due 762.03 J J Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,California 92728-8127 PHONE:17141 962-2411 b FAX:(714)962-3954 9 Invoice Date: 03/21/06 -J Invoice No.: 32023 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 03/21/06 1120 N. Armando St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 ORIGINAL INVOICE INVOICE DUE DATE NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 03/21/06 32023 03/21/06 10% Penalty on Invoice 31637 157.00 �P dal ••` Please Note Due Date ••• •• 10% Penalty an Past Due Amount •• Total Amount Now Due 157.00 j Ss Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 9272"127 PHONE: (714)962-2411 b oa FAX: (714) 9623954 r� Invoice Date: 05/02/06 -u Invoice No.: 32312 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 06/16/06 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 ORIGINAL INVOICE ..' DATE INVOICE DUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NUMBER DATE 05/02/06 32312 06/16/06 Finance Charge 1,866.68 �I •d ••• Please Note Due Date ••• •' 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• Total Amount Now Due 1,886.68 `9 Orange County Sanitation District P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,Caraamie 92728-8127 PHONE: (714)962-2411 b FAX:(714)962.3954 Invoice Date: 05116/06 Invoice No.: 32356 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 05/16/06 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 ORIGINAL INVOICE 1NVQICE DUE ` DATE DC3CRIPTION AMOUNT NUMBER DATE 05116106 32356 05/16I06 10% Penalty on Invoice 515000 1,000.00 a ••• Please Note Due Date •'• " 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount ' Total Amount Now Due 11000.00 Orange County Sanitation District P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,California 92728-8127 PHONE: (714)062.2411 ro FAX:(714)962-3954 Invoice Date: 06/05/06 Invoice No.: 32513 Hawk Industrial Uniform Due Date: 07120/06 1120 N. Armondo St. Account No.: 24897 Anaheim CA 92806 ORIGINAL INVOICE 1 INVOICE DUE ..d DATE NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 06/05/06 32513 07/20/06 Finance Charge 1,197.71 sJ �I J a .r1 1 J •" Please Note Due Date •"• J •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• "+ Total Amount Now Due 1,197.71 r r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1 P O.BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9270&7018 _ PHONE:(/14)962-2411 FAX:(714)962-3954 FISCAL—YEAR 2005-2006 - USE CHARGE INVOICE - 1st QUARTER 1 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM INVOICE DATE: 1 0131/2 0 0 5 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. INVOICE NO. : 514984 ANAHEIM,CA 92806 DUE DATE: UPON RECEIPT 1 — PERMIT NO.: 2-1-079 QUARTERLY BILLING —PLEASE NOTE DUE DATE' 1 JUL 1,2005-SEP 30,2005 PENALTY PLUS INTEREST ON DELINQUENT AMOUNT— Description of Charges Unit Be„ ; '. 1 Million Gallons _ Industrial Volume 1.6904 $637.55 $1,077.71 Sanitary Volume 0.0711 $637.55 $45.33 1 $ .- 1,000 Lha 1,123.04 Industrial BOD( 1,709 mg/L) 24.093 $288.50 $6,950.83 Sanitary SOD(250 mg/L) 0.148 $288.50 $42.70 $6,993.53 1 1,000 Lbs _ Industrial TSS(345 mg/L) 4.864 $432.14 $2,101.93 Sanitary TEE(250 mg/L) 0.148 $432.14 $63.96 1 $2,165.89 1 Total 08M Charge $10,282.46 Total Tax Credit ($163.37) 1 Net O&M Charge $10,119.09 SUPPLEMENTAL CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE(SCFCC)OVER BASELINE 1 Yearly Baseline Allocation: Flow(MG)0.0250 BOD(KLbs)0.186 TSS(KLbs)0.150 Charges Over Baseline Ove�ra ee Rate Charge Industrial VOLUME MG 0.0000 $1001.00 $0.00 1 Industrial BOO 1,000 LBS 7.113 $289.10 $2.056.37 Industrial TSS 1,000 LES 0.000 $ 187.15 $0.00 1 SCFCC Charge $2,056.37 Total O&M and SCFCC Charges $12,175.46 1 ""UNIT BASIS IS ESTIMATED ON QUARTERLY USAGE THIS INVOICE IS DELINQUENT 12115/2005. 1 TO BETTER SERVE YOU AND AS ONE OF YOUR PERMIT CONDITIONS,THE DISTRICT REQUIRES THAT YOUR FIRM SUBMIT COPIES OF YOUR WATER AND TAX BILLS AS OBTAINED-THANK YOU TOTAL 1st QUARTER INVOICE AMOUNT DUE $12,175.46 �I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r I P.O.BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CAUFORNIA 9272841127 10844 EWS AVENUE,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 PHONE:(714)962-2411 FAX:(714)952-3954 rl SEMIANNUAL USE RECONCILIATION CHARGE INVOICE Jul 2004 to DEC 2004 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM INVOICE DATE: 101312006 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. INVOICE NO. 904920 rl ANAHEIM.CA 92806 FISCALYEAR 2004-2005A DUE DATE UPON RECEIPT _I PERMIT NO. 2-1-079 Description of Charges Estimated Actual Unite Rate Charge Billed Units rl Million Gallons Industrial Volume -."` 3.6601 $388.58 $1,349.04 ISanitary Volume y+;_; 4,�:�.�,- 0.1422 $368.58 $52.41 ^' $1.401.45 I 1,000 Lbs Industrial BOD(918 mg/L) 28.022 $248.55 $6,964.87 Sanftary BOD(250 mg/L) ` 0.296 $248.55 $73.57 I $7,038.44 r 1,000 Lbs Industrial TSS(275 mg/L) '" 8.394 $238.45 $2,001.55 r I Sanitary TSS(250 mg/L) �- ,tn"�'^" 0.296 $238.45 $70.58 $2,072.13 I O&M Charge $10,512.02 r I Secured 8 Unsecured Tax Credit ($75.79) r Property Tax Bill Sewer Service Fee Credit ($250.96) ITotal Tax Credit ($326.75) r Net 08M Charge $10,185,27 r I District Collection of Tax Data Fee $0.00 District Collection of Water Data Fee $0.00 rl .. . I rI Total O&M Charges/(Credft) $6,038.21 �I TOTAL INVOICE AMOUNT DUE $6 036.21 .+I This InvolTa is deli ,t after 12/152008. 10%PENALTY PLUS INTEREST ON PAST DUE AMOUNT �I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,OAUFORNIA 92728/1127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9270&7018 PHONE:(714)952-2411 FAX:(714)962-3956 SEMIANNUAL USE RECONCILIATION CHARGE INVOICE Jan 2005 to Jun 2005 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM INVOICE DATE: 10/31/2006 1 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. INVOICE NO. 90535D rll ANAHEIM,CA 9206 FISCALYEAR 20042005E DUE DATE UPON RECEIPT 1 PERMIT NO. : 2-1-079 rl Descdptionorcharges Estimated .Actual Units Rate Charge 'Billed.Units Million Gallons Industrial Volume Lamop 3.1014 $5T7.30 $1,790.44 J Sanitary Volume j?s ,;ft 0.1422 $577.30 $82.09 $1.872.53 1,001 Lbs Industrial SOD(2,500 mg/L) ,y_ ' —§ 64.664 $270.68 $17,50325 Sanitary BOD(250 mg/L) 300 0.296 $270.68 $80.12 $17,683.37 1,000 Lbs Industrial TSS(414 mg/L) 10.708' • � �p� $414.27 $4,438.00 11 Sanitary TSS(250 mg/L) ; 4 ; 0.296 $414.27 $122.62 $4,558.62 JO&M Charge $24.014,52 J Secured 8 Unsecured Tax Credit ($75.79) Property Tax BIII Sewer Servke Fee Credit ($250.96) JTotal Tax Credit ($326.75) Net 08M Charge $23,687.T7 District Collection of Tax Data Fare $100.00 District Collection of Water Data Fare $100.00 J � - JTotal 05M Charges/(Credlt) $18,236.69 J TOTAL INVOICE AMOUNT DUE $18 238.69 JThis Imroloe is deliquent after 12/15/2006. 10%PENALTY PLUS INTEREST ON PAST DUE AMOUNT J I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT I P.O.BOX 5127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA S272Ba127 105"ELLIS AVENUE,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 PHONE:(714)M-2411 FAX:(714)962.39M SUPPLEMENTAL CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE(SCFCC)OVER BASELINE r I HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM INVOICE DATE: 10/31/2006 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. INVOICE NO. 905689 ANAHEIM,CA 92806 FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 r DUE DATE UPON RECEIPT IPERMIT NO. 2-1-079 r Description of Charges Actual Unhs Overage Rate Charge over Beealine IMillion Gallons Industrial Volume 6.7615 0.0000 $1001.00 $0.00 rl 1,000 Lbs IIndustrial BOO( 1,709 mg/L) 96.372 28.847 $289.10 $8,339.67 r I1,000 Live Industrial TSS(345 mg/L) 19.455 0.000 $187.15 $0.00 rl I $8,339.67 r rl rl I (Be advised that SCFCC does not apply unless baseline Is exceeded by amount specified In Ordinance) r I Daily Baseline Allocation: Flow(MG)0.0250 BOD(KLbs)0.185 TSS(KLbs)0.150 r �I rl I TOTAL CFCC INVOICE AMOUNT DUE $6 339.67 r I This Invoice is deliquent after 12/1512008. r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9272&8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 PHONE:(714)962-2411 FAK(714)962-3954 FISCAL—YEAR 2005-2006 - USE CHARGE INVOICE -2nd QUARTER HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM INVOICE DATE: 12/31/2005 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. INVOICE NO.: 515394 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 DUE DATE: UPON RECEIPT IPERMIT NO.: 2-1-079 QUARTERLY BILLING 'PLEASE NOTE DUE DATE— IOCT 1,2005- DEC 31,2005 —10%PENALTY PLUS INTEREST ON DELINQUENT AMOUNT— ' Description of Charges Unit Basis Rate Charge I Million Gallons _ Industrial Volume 1.6904 $637.55 $1,077.71 Sanitary Volume 0.0711 $637.55 $45.33 I $1,123.04 1,00o Lba I Industrial BOD(1,709 mg/L) 24.093 $286.50 $6,950.83 Sanitary BOD(250 mg/L) 0,148 $286.50 $42.70 $6,993.63 I 1,000 Lbs Industrial TSS(345 nr 4.864 $432.14 $2,101.93 Sanitary TSS(250 mg/L) 0.148 $432.14 $63.96 I $2,165.89 I Total O&M Charge $10,282.46 Total Tax Credit ($163.37) Net O&M Charge $10,119.09 I SUPPLEMENTAL CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE(SCFCC)OVER BASELINE I Yearly Baseline Allocation: Flow(MG)0.0250 BOD(KLbs)0.185 TSS(KLbs)0150 Charges Over Baseline Overage Rate Charge Industrial VOLUME MG 0.0000 $1001.00 $0.00 ' Industrial BOD 1,000 LEE 7.113 $289.10 $2.056.37 Industrial TSS 1,000 LBS 0.000 $ 187.15 $0.00 I SCFCC Charge $2,056.37 Total O&M and SCFCC Charges $12,175.46 I "--UNIT BASIS IS ESTIMATED ON QUARTERLY USAGE"" THIS INVOICE IS DELINQUENT 02/1412006. I TO BETTER SERVE YOU AND AS ONE OF YOUR PERMIT CONDITIONS,THE DISTRICT REQUIRES THAT YOUR FIRM SUBMIT COPIES OF YOUR WATER AND TAX BILLS AS OBTAINED-THANK YOU ITOTAL 2nd QUARTER INVOICE AMOUNT DUE $12,175.46 �I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10864 ELLIS AVENUE.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708.7018 PHONE:(714)OW-2411 FAX:(714)982.3954 IFISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 - USE CHARGE INVOICE -3rd QUARTER I HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM INVOICE DATE: 03/31/2006 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. INVOICE NO.: 515800 ANAHEIM,CA 92806 DUE DATE: UPON RECEIPT IPERMIT ND.: 2.1-079 QUARTERLY BILLING —PLEASE NOTE DUE DATE— IJAN 1,2006-MAR 31,200E —10%PENALTY PLUS INTEREST ON DELINQUENT AMOUNT— Description of Charges _ _ 'Unit Basis Rate Charge I Million Gallons _ Industrial Volume 1.6904 $637.55 $1,077,71 Sanitary Volume 0.0711 $637.55 $45.33 I111.123.04 7 1,000 Lbs I Industrial BOD( 1,709 mg/L) 24.093 $288.50 $6,950.83 Sanitary BOD(250 mg/L) 0.148 $288.50 $42.70 $6,993.53 I 1,000 Lbs Industnal TSS(345 mg/L) 4.864 $432.14 $2,101.93 Sanitary TSS(250 mg/L) 0.148 S432.14 $63.96 I $2.165.89 I Total 08M Charge $10,21l Total Tax Credit ($163.37) INet 08M Charge $10.119.09 SUPPLEMENTAL CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE(SCFCC)OVER BASELINE I Yearly Baseline Allocation: Flow(MG10.0250 BOD(KLbs)0185 TSS(KLbs)0.15 Charges Over Baseline Overacle Rate Charge Industrial VOLUME MG 0.0000 $1001.00 $0.00 I Industrial BOD 1,000 LBS 7,113 $289.10 $2.056.37 Industrial TSS 1,000 LBS O.ODO $ 187.15 $0.00 SCFCC Charge $2,056.37 Total 08M and SCFCC Charges $12,175.46 ""UNIT BASIS IS ESTIMATED ON QUARTERLY USAGE-"' THIS INVOICE IS DELINQUENT 05115/2006. 1 TO BETTER SERVE YOU AND AS ONE OF YOUR PERMIT CONDITIONS,THE DISTRICT REQUIRES THAT YOUR FIRM SUBMIT COPIES OF YOUR WATER AND TAX BILLS AS OBTAINED-THANK YOU TOTAL 3rd QUARTER INVOICE AMOUNT DUE $12,175.46 rl Orange County Sanitation District �? P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,California 9272MI27 PHONE: (714)962-2411 FAX: (714)962-3954 rl Invoice Date: 05/02/06 rI Invoice No.: 32312 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORMS Due Date: 06/16/06 rl 1120 N. ARMONDO Account No.: 24897 ANAHEIM CA 92806 rl I ORIGINAL INVOICE I DATE INVOICE DUE NUMBER DATE ". DESCRIPTION ANIOUNT 05/02/06 32312 06/16/06 Finance Charge 1,866.68 ..1 rl ••• Please Note Due Date ••• •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• ^I Total Amount Now Due 11866.88 �1 r Orange County Sanitation District 4a P.O.Box 8127 r Fountain Valley,CalHomle 92728-8127 PHONE:(714)962-2411 r4 eo FAX:(714)962-3954 Invoice Date: 05/16106 'r Invoice No.: 32356 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORMS Due Date: 05/16106 r 1120 N. ARMONDO Account No.: 24897 ANAHEIM CA 92806 r ORIGINAL INVOICE r INVOICE DUE r DATE NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 05/16/O6 32356 05/16/06 10% Penalty on Invoice 515800 1,000.00 r r r r r r rl ••• Pieces Note Due Date ••• •+I •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• rl Total Amount Now Due 11000.00 rl rl Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CBBlamla 92728-B127 PHONE: (714) 962-2411 _I b eo FAX: (714) 962-3954 s� Invoice Date: 06/05/06 Invoice No.: 32513 a_I HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORMS Due Date: 07/20/06 1120 N. ARMONDO Account No.: 24897 �I ANAHEIM CA 92806 ORIGINAL INVOICE I DATE INVOICE 'DUE DESCRIPTION -AMOUNT- _+ NUMBER DATE 06/05/06 32513 07/20106 Finance Charge 1,197.71 J J J J J J J "• Please Note Due Date ••' •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •' JTotal Amount Now Due 1,197.71 1 J ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9272 8127 10W ELLIS AVENUE,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92705-7018 PHONE:(714)962-2411 FAX:(714)962.3951 FISCAL-YEAR 2005.2006 -USE CHARGE INVOICE-4th QUARTER HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM INVOICE DATE: 0613omw 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. INVOICE NO.: 516204 r ANAHEIM,CA 92806 DUE DATE: UPON RECEIPT PERMIT NO.: 2-1-079 QUARTERLY BILLING —PLEASE NOTE DUE DATE— APR 1,2006-JUN 30.2006 —10%PENALTY PLUS INTEREST ON DELINQUENT AMOUNT^' r Million Gallons Industrial Volume 1.6904 $637.55 $1.077.71 ed Sanitary Volume 0.0711 $637.55 $45.33 $1.123.04 1,000 Lbs ed Industrial BOD(1,709 mg/L) 24.093 $288.50 $6,950.83 Sanitary BOD(250 mglL) 0.148 $288.50 S42.70 r $6,993.63 1.000 Lbs Industrial TSS(345 mglL) 4.864 S432.14 $2,101.93 r Sanitary TSS(250 mg/L) 0.148 S432.14 $63.96 $2,165.89 Total O&M Charge $10,282.46 Total Tax Credit ($163.37) r Net O&M Charge $10.119.09 SUPPLEMENTAL CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGE(SCFCC)OVER BASELINE ed Yearly Baseline Allocation: F12MMG)0.0250 BOD(KLbs)0 185 TSS(KLbs)0 150 Charges Over Baseline Ovaraae Rate Chage Industrial VOLUME MG 0.0000 $1001.00 $0.00 r Industrial SOD 1,000 LES 7.113 $289.10 $2,056.37 Industrial TSS 1,000 LES 0.000 $187.15 $0.00 _ SCFCC Charge $2,056.37 Total 08M and SCFCC Charges $12,175.46 -UNIT BASIS IS ESTIMATED ON QUARTERLY USAGE--- THIS INVOICE IS DELINQUENT 08/14/2006. TO BETTER SERVE YOU AND AS ONE OF YOUR PERMIT CONDITIONS,THE DISTRICT REQUIRES THAT YOUR FlRM SUBMIT COPIES OF YOUR WATER AND TAX BILLS AS OBTAINED-THANK YOU .. TOTAL 41th QUARTER INVOICE AMOUNT DUE $12,175.46 rl Orange County Sanitation District I >t� P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,California 92728-8127 PHONE:1714)962-2411 o�c� FAX:1714)962-3954 rl Invoice Date: 07/02/06 Invoice No.: 32726 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORMS Due Date: 08116/06 �I 1120 N. ARMONDO Account No.: 24897 IANAHEIM CA 92806 I ORIGINAL INVOICE r DATE INVOICE DUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT r NUMBER DATE 07/02/06 32726 08/16/06 Finance Charge 1,013.94 �I JI JI '•• Please Note Due Data ••• •• 10% Penalty an Past Due Amount JTotal Amount Now Due 1,013.94 J J IOrange County Sanitation District �I 9 P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,Cal fomie 9 2 7 28-81 27 PHONE: 1714) 962-2411 b ao FAX: (714)962-3954 J J Invoice Date: 08/02/06 Invoice No.: 32899 J HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORMS Due Date: 08/02/06 1120 N. ARMONDO Account No.: 24897 ANAHEIM CA 92806 J J ORIGINAL INVOICE J DATE INVOICE DUE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NUMBER DATE J08/02/06 32899 08/02/06 1011 Penalty on Invoice 32513 119.77 J J J J J J =•' Please Note Due Date '•• ' 10% Penalty on Pest Due Amount •' Total Amount Now Due 119.77 J �I Orange County Sanitation District �I P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 PHONE: (714) 962-2411 b FAX: (714)962-3954 �I �I Invoice Data; 08/02/06 Invoice No.: 32909 J HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORMS Due Date: 09/16/06 1120 N. ARMONDO Account No.: 24897 ANAHEIM CA 92806 J J ORIGINAL INVOICE J DATE INVOICE DUE .. .DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NUMBER DATE 08/02/06 32909 09/16/06 Finance Charge 1,140.13 J J J J J J J '•• Please Note Due Date •'• •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount •• JTotal Amount Now Due 1.140.13 i �I Orange County Sanitation District 9 P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 PHONE: 1714)962-2411 �I t7 DG FAX: (714)962-3954 Invoice Date: 08/16/06 rl Invoice No.: 33017 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORMS Due Date: 08/16/06 JI 1120 N. ARMONDO Account No.: 24897 ANAHEIM CA 92806 JI I ORIGINAL INVOICE INVOICE DUE DATE NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION ANII)11NT 08/16/06 33017 08/16/06 10% Penalty on Invoice 516204 1.000.00 rl �I �I �I �I �I '• Please Note Due Date ••• <rI •• 10% Penalty on Past Due Amount '• Total Amount Now Due 1,000.00 rl rl Orange County Sanitation District J m P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,California 92728-8127 PHONE:1714)962.2411 b eo FAX:(714)962-3954 Invoice Date: 09/05/06 Invoice No.: 33129 J HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORMS Due Date: 10/20106 1120 N. ARMONDO Account No.: 24897 ANAHEIM CA 92806 ORIGINAL INVOICE d7 1 INV{Nce DUE - -. JJ DATE NUNB9t DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 09/05/08 33129 10/20/06 Finance charge 1,399.56 I J i e. '•• Please Note Due Date ••• •• 10% Penally on Past Due Amount '• Total Amount Now Due 1,399.56 r EXHIBIT D Hawk Industrial Uniform .. Notices of Violation and Wastewater Analysis Reports r MHawk AGminsnWe Gomplain1091206FINAA ..OUNTY SANITATT N DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. 4 E 6127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA2708-70121 10944 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, ALIFORNIA 82786-701e 1714)962.2411 r November to, 1994. REF k491241.LTR Ralph Hawkins Hawk Industrial Uniform _ 1120 N. Armando St. Anaheim, CA 92806 r ,r SELF-MONITORING NOTICE OF VIOLATION Permit No: 2-1.079 Subject: Sell-Monkoring Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: Oil & Grease r Based upon the enclosed Self-Monitoring Wastewater Analysis Report for the sample collected on r September 19, 1994. your company was in violation of Its permitted discharge limits and must resample for Oil & Grease. In response to this non-compliance, your company must take immediate corrective action and re-sample Its Industrial discharge by December 10, 1994. The results must be submitted to the Districts' Administration Office in Fountain Valley by December 30. 1994. r Failure to report within 30 days of the reporting due date may result in additional enforcement actions. These actions may Include but are not limited to additional sampling and classification as a Significantly Non-Compliant (SNC) company. Should your company be identified as SNC. its name will be published r in the Orange County Register as a significant violator. If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Chris Pelletier at (714) 962-2411, extension 3814. d Mahin Talebi r Source Control Manager MT:hk Enclosure r r r r County Sanitation Districts am of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 Source Control Division r SELF-MONITORING WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE: 10/26/94 - 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO: 2-1-079 ANAHEIM CA 92806 LAB. NO. : 57371 INSPECTOR: JC ATTN I RALPH HAWKINS SAMPLE TYPE: 5-2 r Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date: 09/19/94 Time: 1100 Location: SAMPLE BOX r Composite Hours Actual Discharge MGD (Million Gallons / Day) Mass Emission Rate Flow Base 1 .00500 MGD Effective : 05/10/94 Oisdarae Permit Limit Over Limit r Violation Violation CPrmtitusnta eg/L Lbs/Dey ag/L Ibs/Day ag/L lbs/Day Percent Over Type Oil B Grease Kin. 285.00 i00.00 185.00 185.0% % r r am r r me Please address any questions concerning this report to Mr. Chris Pelletier at extension 3514. maREVIEWED By I INSPECTOR 1/I r L INSPECT0R: r Fhn�now COUNTY SANITATIuN DISTRICTS J�11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA R.O BOX 6127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272B-6127 10a44 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 r (714)962-2411 December 14, 1994 REF p491405.LTR RUSTY HAWKINS, VICE-PRESIDENT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM • 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. ANAHEIM, CA 92806 NOTICE OF VIOLATION r Permit No: 2-1-079 Subject: Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: November 18, 1994 Based upon the enclosed Wastewater Analysis Report for Sample No. 42064 collected by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) on 11/18/94, your company was in violation of its permitted discharge limits. your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. r The following summarizes the violation associated with your wastewater discharge: Constituent(s) in Violation Total Toxic Organics r Violation of your permit discharge limits may result in additional enforcement actions against your company, including, but not limited to, non-compliance sampling fees and your company being r classified as Significantly Non-Compliant ISNCI. Should your company be identified as SNC, its name will be published in the newspaper as a significant violator. If you have any questions, please telephone the u signed at 17141 2-2411, extension 3812. ames Bennie ource Control Supervisor r cc: CSDOC Inspector - JC JERAYJOHNSTON .r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 Source Control Division ,r WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE: 12/05/94 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO: 2-1-079 ANAHEIM , CA 92806 LAB. NO. : 42064 INSPECTOR: Jc ATTN RALPH HAWKINS SAMPLE TYPE: 2 Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date: 11/18/94 Time: 1000 Location:. SBC Composite Hours Actual Discharge MGD (Million Gallons / Day) Mass Emission Rate Flow Base . 00500 MGD Effective : 05/10/94 s Discharge Permit Limit Over Limit Violation Violation Conti[Lents mg/L lbs/Day mg/L lbs/Day mg/L lbs/Day Percent Over Type 624 2.13 0.0% 624-TTO 2.04 0.01 624-Misc. 5.10 0.0% w Total Toxic Organics 2.04 0.58 1.46 251M % r a a Please atNress any Question concerning this report to Mr. James Berrie at eaten ion 3812. REVIEVED BY INSPECTOR: /(/jIzl7/Sy L INSPECTOR: LARVA ti,�h county Sanitation Districts of Orange County Purgeable Hydrocarbons, Method 624 Industry Name: HAWK INDUSTRIAL Green Sheet f: 42064 Sample Desc. : GRAB Sample Date: 11/18/94 Inspector: JC Date Analyzed: 11/22/94 Analyst: ML Dil. Factor: 50.00 Results DL Commound pia/L) !uo/M 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane ND <10.5 1, 1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane NO <19.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND <12. 5 1, 1-Dichloroethane ND <12.5 1, 1-Dichloroethene ND <14. 0 1, 2-Dichloroethane ND <11.5 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND <16.0 1,2-Dichloropropane ND <14 .0 - 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND <20.5 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND <20.0 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether NO <33 . 5 _ 2-Hexanone* ND <22.5 Acetone* 1,500.0 <125.0 m Acrolein* ND <135. 0 Acrylonitrile* ND <19. 0 - Bromodichloromethane ND <9.5 Bromomethane ND <31.5 Benzene ND <13. 0 Bromoform ND <11.5 Chlorobenzene ND <10. 5 Carbon Tetrachloride ND <14. 0 Chloroethane ND <22 .5 Chloroform 45.0 <9.5 Chloromethane ND <14.5 Carbon Disulfide* ND <10.0 - Dibromochloromethane ND <9.5 Ethylbenzene 394.0 <8.5 2-Butanone* ND <40.0 - 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone* 138.0 <24 .5 Methylene Chloride 104.0 <13 .5 Styrene* 36. 0 <12.5 Trichloroethene ND <10.0 Trichloroflucromethane NO <15.0 Toluene 1, 467. 0 <13 .5 Tetrachloroethene 26. 0 <9. 5 Vinyl Acetate* 157. 0 <60. 0 Vinyl Chloride ND <18.0 m-Xylene, p-Xylene* 2, 019. 0 <15. 0 11/30/94 Page 1 of 2 County Sanitation Districts of orange county Purgeable Hydrocarbons, Method 624 Industry Name: HAWK INDUSTRIAL Green Sheet 1: 42064 Sample Desc. : GRAB Sample Date: 11/18/94 ® Inspector: JC Date Analyzed: 11/22/94 Analyst: ML Dil. Factor: 50.00 Results DL Compound (uio/L) fuc/LI r cis-1,3-Dichloropropene NO <8.5 - trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND <8. 5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene NO <11. 0 o-Xylene+ 1, 248 . 0 <8 . 5 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND <6. 5 Total Method 624 Compounds: 7,234.0 µg/L (total of detected sample results) Verified By: ML Date Verified: 11/30/94 Comments: ND = none detected Method 624 (EPA, 40 CFR Part 136, Federal Register, October 1984) DL = Detection Limit (ug/L) . Revised 09/01/93 * Nonregulated Purgeable Hydrocarbons 11/30/94 Page 2 of 2 a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS r OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 927D8-7018 r "+4c cW (714)982-2411 September 26, 1996 REF #691101.LTR r RUSTY HAWKINS, VICE PRESIDENT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. r ANAHEIM, CA 92806 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Permit No: 2-1-079 r Subject: Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: September 11, 1996 _ Based upon the enclosed Wastewater Analysis Report for Sample No. 50818 collected by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) on 09111/96, your company was in violation of its permitted discharge limits. Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. The following summarizes the violation associated with your wastewater discharge: Constituentls) in Violation ® Total Toxic Organics Violation of your permit discharge limits may result in additional enforcement actions against r your company, including, but not limited to, non-compliance sampling fees and your company being classified as Significantly Non-Compliant ISNC). Should your company be identified as SNC, its name will be published in the newspaper as a significant violator. �+ If you have any questions, please telephone the undersigned at (714) 982-2411, extension 3812. r 2 ames Kenzie urce Control Supervisor r cc: CSDOC Inspector- DL r r r r ( 1 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue r P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 Source Control Division ,r WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE: 09/24/96 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO: 2-1-079 r ANAHEIM CA 92806 LAB. NO. : 50818 INSPECTOR: DL ATTN RALPH HAWKINS SAMPLE TYPE: 2 r Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: a, Sample Date: 09/11/96 Time: 1400 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours Actual Discharge MGD (Million Gallons / Day) Mass Emission Rate Flow Base .01000 MGD Effective : 05/01/96 d Discharge Permit Limit OYer Limit Violation Violation Constituents mWL lbs/Dey mg/L lbs/Day ne/L Ibs/Day Percent Over Type r 624-TTO 1.70 O.D% 624-Bisc. 0.37 0.0% 624 2.07 0.0% Total Toxic Organics 1.70 0.58 1.12 192.8% % We r r as Please address any questions concerning this report to Mr. James Berne at extension 3812. a REVIFIlED BY sty. �J, INSPECTOR: W 112 I1716 M L INSPECTOR: IAa •LS i(� �6Y %-.OUNTY SANITATIli DISTRICTS a + OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA - P.O. BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 927294127 100"ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708.7018 (714)OWN2411 r December 2, 1998 REF #694349.LTR RUSTY HAWKINS, VICE PRESIDENT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. ANAHEIM, CA 92806 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Permit No: 2-1-079 Subject: Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: October 24, 1996 Based upon the enclosed Wastewater Analysis Report for Sample No. 51726 collected by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) on 10/24/96, your company was in violation of its permitted discharge limits. Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. To a, verity that all necessary corrective measures have been taken to resolve the non-compliance, the Districts will re-sample your company's wastewater discharge in the near future. The following summarizes the violation and the fees associated with the Districts re-sampling your wastewater discharge: Constituent(s) in Violation Total Toxic Organics a Laboratory Analysis Fee: 5 219 Non-compliance Processing & Sampling Fee: $ 500 Total Fee: 9 719 An invoice for the amount presented above will be sent to your company under separate cover. Please s, notify your Accounts Payable Department to assure timely payment to avoid additional enforcement actions against your company. Violation of your permit discharge limits may result in additional enforcement actions against your company, including, but not limited to, non-compliance sampling fees and your company being classified as Significantly Non-Compliant (SNC). Should your company be identified as SNC, its name will be published in the newspaper as a significant violator. If you have any questions, please telephone the and si ed at 17141 2-2411, extension 3812. a , es Benzie wce Control Su visor Enclosure cc: CSDOC Accounts Receivable ~ CSDOC Inspector - DL N N d . .. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 Source Control Division WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT w HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE: 11/13/96 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO: 2-1-079 w ANAHEIM , CA 92806 LAB. NO. : 51726 INSPECTOR: DL ATTN RALPH HAWKINS SAMPLE TYPE: 2C r Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date: 10/24/96 Time: 0930 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours Actual Discharge MGD (Million Gallons / Day) w Mass Emission Rate Flow Base . 01000 MGD Effective : 05/01/96 r Discharge Permit Limit Over Limit Violation violation Cmmtita is mg/L Iles/Day NNLA lbs/DeY sell. lbs/Day Percent Over Type 624-TTO 5.04 0.0% 624-Misr. 0.71 0.0% 624 5.76 0.0% ,r Total Tosic Organic 5.04 0.58 4.46 769.5% MAJOR r w sa w Please a0ress ev a tiana cmuernim this report to Mr. James Bede at extension 3812. a REVIEM BY G / INSPECTOR: D L IMSPECTOR:V4Ie. r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Purgeable Hydrocarbons, Method 624 r Industry Name: HAWK INDUSTRIAL Green Sheet #: 51726 sample Desc. : MATH AVE Sample Date: 10/24/96 r Inspector: DL Date Analyzed: 10/25/96 Analyst: ML Dil. Factor: 10 . 00 r Results DL Compound (ua/L) (ua/LI 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane ND <2. 1 1, 1, 2, 2-Tetrachloroethane ND <3 . 8 1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane ND <2. 5 r 1, 1-Dichloroethane ND <2. 5 1, 1-Dichloroethee ND <2 . 8 1, 2-Dichloroethane ND <2 . 3 ,r 1, 2-Dichlorobenzene ND <3 . 2 1, 2-Dichloropropane ND <2 . 6 1, 3-Dichlorobenzene ND <4 . 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND <4 . 0 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether ND <6.7 _ 2-Hexanone• ND <4. 5 Acetone- 134 . 0 <25 . 0 ,r Acrolein• ND <27 .0 Acrylonitrile• ND 0. 8 Bromodichloromethane ND <1.9 Bromomethane ND <6 . 3 Benzene ND <2. 6 Bromoform ND <2 .3 Chlorobenzene ND <2. 1 ,r Carbon Tetrachloride ND <2.8 Chloroethane ND <4. 5 Chloroform 34 . 0 <1 . 9 r Chloromethane ND <2 . 9 Carbon Disulfide* ND <2 . 0 Dibromochloromethane ND <1. 9 Ethylbenzene 71.0 <1.7 2-Butanone' 31. 0 <8. 0 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone• ND <4 . 9 Methylene Chloride 7 . 0 <2. 7 r Styrene' 8 . 4 <2 . 5 Trichloroethee ND <2. 0 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 0 . 0 _ Toluene 4, 682 . 0 <2 . 7 Tetrachloroethene 249 . 0 <1 . 9 Vinyl Acetate` ND <12. 0 Vinyl Chloride ND 0 . 6 r m-Xylene, p-Xylene• 255 . 0 <3 . 0 r 11/06/96 Page 1 of 2 r d County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Purgeable Hydrocarbons, Method 624 Industry Name: HAWK INDUSTRIAL Green Sheet #: 51726 Sample Desc. : MATH AVE Sample Date: 10/24/96 r Inspector: DL Date Analyzed: 10/25/96 Analyst: ML Dil. Factor: 10 .00 r Results DL Compound (ua/L) (ua/L) cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene NO <1 .7 trans-1, 2-Dichloroethene ND <1 . 7 trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene ND <2. 2 r o-Xylene' 285 . 0 <1 . 7 cis-1, 2-Dichloroethene ND <1 . 3 Total Method 624 Compounds: 5,756.4 µg/L (total of detected sample results) Verified By: ML Date Verified: 11/06/96 Comments: ND = none detected a Method 624 (EPA, 40 CFR Part 136, Federal Register, October 1984) d DL = Detection Limit (ug/L) . Revised 09/01/93 • Nonregulated Purgeable Hydrocarbons r a a a+ a 11/06/96 Page 2 of 2 s r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 b n tOd44 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92711a-701e (714) 982-2411 r November 16, 1998 REF d890882.LTR r LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. ANAHEIM, CA 92806 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Permit No: 2-1-079 Subject: Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: September 10, 1998 Based upon the enclosed Wastewater Analysis Report for Sample No. 71350 collected by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) on 09110/98, your company was in violation of its permitted discharge limits. Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. ~ The following summarizes the violation associated with your wastewater discharge: Constituent(s) in Violation w Oil & Grease Min. Violation of your permit discharge limits may result in additional enforcement actions against s, your company, Including, but not limited to, non-compliance sampling fees and your company being classified as Significantly Non-Compliant (SNC). Should your company be Identified as SNC, Its name will be published in the newspaper as a significant violator. If you have any questions, please telephone the undersigned at (714) 962-2411, extension 3812. r James Bennie Source Control Supervisor r cc: CSDOC Inspector - MS r r r es r r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. BOX 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 Source Control Division s WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM _ REPORT DATE: 10/19/98 r 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO: 2-1-079 ANAHEIM CA 92806 LAB. NO. : 71350 INSPECTOR: MS ,., ATTN RUSTY HAWKINS SAMPLE TYPE: 2 Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: 'tl Sample Date : 09/10/98 Time: 1330 Location: SBC Composite Hours r Actual Discharge MGD (Million Gallons / Day) Mass Emission Rate Flow Base .01600 MGD Effective : 05/01/98 vd Discharge Permit Limit Over limit Violation Violation Constituents mg/L Ibs/Dey mg/L Ibs/Day mg/L Ibs/Oay Percent Over Type ma _ OIL 8 Grease Min. 301.00 200.00 101.00 50.5% X .r m r r Please address any questions concerning this report to Mr. Janes Bentie at extension 3312. REVIEWED BY A os INSPECTOR: /v1 /0/ujI9,9 ed ((( ,��1 L INSPECTOR: V I T ORANGE COUNTY SANITATICN DISTRICT .. ( pla.e: March 12, 1999 n141662-2411 LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER ( man a e81122i� HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM roanlem ww..CA 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. 92726.8127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 r iUB44 silt Avenue Fvunteln Wllvy,CA — 92708-701e Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: January 26, 1999 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 IA1.wm.r Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 174709 collected by A,.d. the Orange County Sanitation District on 01/26/99, your company was in violation of its 0 permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: I csl.. a bim Constituent(s) In Violation Bre. Beene Pert Total Toxic Organics Cypress r Poantem We, Fellermn Your company must take Immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may Gerdes mays result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to r oava eaaane Your company beingclassed as Significantly Noncompliant(SNC) Should our company Y e be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a L.&.ice. significant violator. I Newport Beach ^r °'Beaa You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance determination Peron e &sate ana in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. err SeelBeach I wil 7i . ou have any q tions, please telephone Jim Benzie at (714)593-7444. cob Pel* , I xxea 1gea a.., miss Benzie ource Control Su rvisor Ik.ry al.trl.b r Caste Moen Miewey c4r c: OCSD Accounts Receivable pr oletrl.t. OCSD Inspector- MS OCSD Engineer-MHK lrvinu Runch � I � I r I 'TO Pr ccl&,e Public Heel&,ono Me Ervnonman[Mraugn Excellence in Wastewecer 5,,ams- r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 e. Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 Source Control Division WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT r _ HAWK INDIISTRZAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE: 02/23/99 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO: 2-1-079 r ANAHEIM , CA 92806 LAB. NO. : 174709 INSPECTOR: MS ATTN RUSTY HAWKINS SAMPLE TYPE: 2 r Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date: 01/26/99 Time: 1300 Location: SBC Composite Hours Actual Discharge MGD (Million Gallons / Day) r Mass Emission Rate Flow Base . 01600 MGD Effective : 05/01/98 r Discharge Permit Limit Dyer Limit Violation violation Caatitaents ag/L IDs/Dsy mg/L Lbs/Day IRIA tbs/Day Percent Over Type r 624•Misc. 93.53 0.0% _ 624-TTO 85.32 0.0% 624 181.84 0.0% ,r Total Toxic Organics 88.32 0.58 87.74 "aaeeX % r r r r Please address any qu tia,s cagemimg this report to Mr. James gentle at extension 3812. r REVIEWED BY INSPECTOR: 2 � �//� L INSPECTOR: r I � LRNS-SC Interbee Report-Completed Green Sheets Green Sheet M 17 Permit 2A HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM LIMS fl 174,709.00 Collected 126/99 by Merril Seiler Lab Released Date 222/99 624_SC l,l,l-nichloroethane < 38.00 UG L vinyl acetate < 520.00 UG_L 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 1504.00 WILL vinyl chloride < 580.00 UG_L 1,1,2.trichloroethane 444.00 UG_L 1,1-dichloroethane < 19.00 UG_L I,Idichloroethene < 139.00 UG L 1,2dichlorobenzene < 26.01) UG L 1,2dichlorcethane < 34.00 UG_L 1,2dichloropropane 1844.00 UG L 1,3dichlorobenzene < 26.00 UG_L 1,4dichlorobenzene < 39.00 UG L 2-butanone, 3994M UG L 2-chloroethylvinyl ether < 46.00 UG L _ 2-hexanone < 293.00 UG_L 4-methyl-2-pemmmone < 215.00 UG_L acetone 47005.00 UG_L acrolein < 640.00 UG_L _ acrylonitrile < 320.0o UG_L benzene 1840.00 UG_L bromodichlommethane 2220.00 UG_L bromoferm -< 42.00 UG_L e. bromomethane < 640.00 UG_L carbon disulfide < 200.00 UG_L carbon tetrachloride < 59.00 UG_L chlorobeozene < 24.00 UG_L chlorcethane < 800.00 UG_L chloroform < 34.00 UG_L chloromedme .< 700.00 UG_L cis-12-dichloroethene < 30.00 UG_L cis-1,3-dichloropropcnc < 42.00 UG_L dibromochloromethane < 64.00 UG_L ethylbenzene 3698.00 UG L m,pxytenes 17292.00 UG_L methylene chloride 10594.00 UG_L o-xylene 24456.00 UG L a. styrene 790.00 UG_L tehachloroethene 2478.00 UG L toluene 63575.00 UG_L trans-12-dichloroethene < 69.00 UG_L trans-0-dichloropropene < 40.00 UG_L trichloroethene 130.00 UG_L trichlorofluoromethane < 360.00 UG L ee Printed 2/23199 10:23 Resuln_byCcmpletedGS.r Page 25 of 67 b ORANGE COUNTY SANITATIO,� DISTRICT aeww: March 12, 1999 0141 9 62-2411 LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER Pa ew e1z) �0np 8127 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM _ raamam wl'.c 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. 92ras 91z] ANAHEIM, CA 928M �1 rtewtaadlau: 19944 efu5 Aram PourR®n VeOey.G 927917019 Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICT'S MONITORING Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: January 26, 1999 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 r.,m.e Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 174710 collected by a0°� the Orange County Sanitation District on 01M199, your company was in violation of its permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: _I Clun ,1ienB1T Constituent(s) In Violation e ae Buena pert Oil 8 Grease Min. C1P1ass " r Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may Fungi-ron soya result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company w Hat.-a be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a significant violator. t P atanures r IV.wPar[Beam °rena° You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance determination sa, a� in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. se.t aaam 'y T�"a1Ob� f you have any uestions, please telephone Jim Benzie at (714)593-7444. Vne Perk YONa LtiMe aaky ar ar.... ames Benzie ource Con Vol Supervisor Came Mae. fte y cry c: OCSD Accounts Receivable J.u, Di.,]. OCSD Inspector- MS OCSD Engineer- MHK P m Ranh _I _I _I T.Protect Ne Pub4c Hea/N end NB Ennrvnment through E[Cenence M Wes[awater Systems" am r County Sanitation Districts r of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 r Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 r Source Control Division WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT r HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE: 02/17/99 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO: 2-1-079 r ANAHEIM , CA 92806 LAB. NO. : 174710 INSPECTOR: MS ATTN RUSTY HAWKINS SAMPLE TYPE: 2 r Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date: 01/26/99 Time: 1255 Location: SBC Composite Hours Actual Discharge MGD (Million Gallons / Day) r Mass Emission Rate Flow Base .01900 MGD Effective : 05/01/98 r Discharge Permit Limit Over Limit violation Vlalat ien Constituents ss/L Lbs/Dey m/L Lbs/Day mg/L lbs/Day Percent Over Type ma OR 8 Oresce Min. 940.00 200.00 740.00 37D.0% % r r r r Please address any question concerning this report to Mr. Jams Bettie at extension 3812. r RIYIMD By INSPECTOR: 2/ / R- r 7 L INSPECTOR: rl ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT _ I _ I November 8, 1999 n141962-2411 LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER m'"1npetl0iai` HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM P.Q atu 9127 rgarcan vanes,rA 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. 92728-8127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 rlI Ceee.ddrta.: R fIDd4 ells Avenue fbumein Valley.G I 92708-7o,e Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING . Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: September 9, 1999 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 tame.. Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 216755 collected by °gvnGeO the Orange County Sanitation District on 09109/1999, your company was in violation of its permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: _I title. a,ehem Constituent(s) In Violation _I Buena P.,* Total Toxic Organics Lypress F0iY1M'" nuey Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may FUIIGYnn careen Dore result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to Ifa,nengMn Beedi your company being classed as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company r4 rl/eare be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a significant violator. la¢Alemac Newpot Beach Ctrenga You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. be Stal'ac_I Seal Beech " If y u have any qua ns, pleasedelephone Jim Bennie at (714)593-7444. Tustin Y,lle Pet* mroe ulna —k°ate °f o°.... J es Bennie urce Control Supervisor _�n14ry ci.srlet. Gbene '"ems c: OCSD Accounts Receivable Mlewey Gry OCSD Inspector- AC r Iw.e.t o+eenla.e OCSD Engineer- JT I tic Ranch _I _I _I 70 P bect Me Public H 810,end Me Enwnment mmugh Emetwce in Wastewater s,,b a s- Orange County Sanitation District r 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,California 92728.8127 (714)962-2411 r Source Control Division r WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT r HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 09/17/1999 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 'pe ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 216765 INSPECTOR AC Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE : 2 a Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: r Sample Date 09/09/1999 Time : 0950 Location: END OF PIPE-CLARIFIER Composite Hours e, Actual Discharge Mass Emmisslon Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective: Discharge Permg Uma Over Lima Violation Violation r constituents mCdL IWNaV "R6 man. IbsfDay Pemem Over TVoe 624 2.24 0.0 r 624-1,11su 0.74 0.0 MTBE < 0.01 0.00 0.0 Total Toxle Orgonlo 1.50 .,: . :i0.58 "-0.92% ;?-.'139.1p_j r Please addre any questions canceming this report to Jim Benzie at 714-593-7444.Y REVIEWED By 01 r r / I LIMS-SC Interface Report-Completed Green Sheets Green Sheet# 216755 Permit 2-1-079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM LIMS# 216,755.00 Collected 9ff/99 by Amold Chavez Lab Released Daze 9/15,199 624_SC 41,1-trichloroethane < 7.60 UG_L I,I,2,2-te7uahloroethane < 6.40 UG_L 1,1,2-trichloroethane < 720 UG_L 1,1-dichloroethane < 3-60 UG_L 1,1dichloroethene < 27.60 UG_L 1,2dichlorobenzene < 520 UG_L 1,2dichloroethane < 6.30 UG_L r 1,2-dichloropropane < 9.60 UG_L _ 0dichlorobenzene < 520 UG_L 1,4-dichlorobenzene < 7.60 UG_L r 2-butanone 99.40 UG_L _ 2-chloroethylvinyl ether < 9 20 UG_L 2-hezanone < 23.60 UG_L r 4-methyl-2-pentanone < 1720 UG_L MTBE < 8.00 UG L acetone 403.00 UG L acrolem < I28.00 UG_L acrylonft le < 64.00 UG_L benzene < 4.00 UG_L r bromodichloromethare 30.40 UG_L bromoform < 8.40 UG_L bromomethane < 128.00 UG_L r carbon disulfide < 40.00 UG_L carbon tetrachloride < 11.60 UG_L - chlorobeamne < 4.80 UG_L chloroethane < 160.00 UG_L r chloroform < 6.90 UG_L chloromethane < 140.00 UG_L cis-1,2dichloroethene < 6.00 UG_L cis-1,3dichloropmpme < 8.40 UG_L dibromochloromethane < 12.80 UG_L ethylbenzene 29.40 UG_L m,p-zylenes 130.00 UG_L methylene chloride < 44.00 UG L o-aylene 105.00 UG_L p-bromofluombenzene B09.60 UG_L styrene < 6.40 UG_L tetrachloroethene 43.60 UG_L r toluene 1370.00 UGL trans-Irdichloroethene < 13.60 UG__L trans-1,3dichloropropene 30.40 UG_L r trlchloroethene < 8.80 UG_L trichlorofluoromethane < 72.00 UG_L vinyl acetate < 104.00 UG_L r vinyl chloride < 116.00 UG_L r Printed 9/1699 9:47 Results_byCompletedGS.r Page 23 of 60 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT IPhone: November 8, 1999 9141 SU-2411 LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER .111ne seer...: HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM r Pa eu8127 rauncein vanes.GA 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. e2728-8127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 r rtreetdense: 1 c644 ense rwntein Valley GA rA 92708-701s Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICT'S MONITORING Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: September 9, 1999 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 IMetnuer, Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 216756 collected by Aeeeties the Orange County Sanitation District on 09/09/1999, your company was in violation of its 0 permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: Icities a dim Constituent(s) In Violation area s I auena Perk Oil&Grease Min. es F'un�Fe g ,.Wen Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may G&osion r result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to your company being classed as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company L.H&a be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a ;r a Palma significant violator. Las wtrei.s Abm,tet Beach r B,eng. You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance determination Placenta Bantu Ana in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. Reel Beach r � If ewn ou have any q stions, please telephone Jim Benzie at (714)593-74 . V&Park //{�/g, 44 Inob.Linde �il'74,L1 /V-C�f L ,r lea�tr er Drone. mes Benzie urce Control Supervisor 1niury olseritte fnsea Mesa MiCxsry Gry c: OCSD Accounts Receivable Iw,c.r DistrictsOCSD Inspector-AC OCSD Engineer- JT Irn'ne Rench sl � I � I To Protect the Public Health and the Enmr.nment through&¢.Ilene in wastewater Systems- ( 1 Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 Source Control Division r WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 09/1511999 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 ANAHEIM. CA 92806 LAB NO. 2167W INSPECTOR AC Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE 2 m Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date 09/09/1999 Time : 0950 Location: END OF PIPE-CLARIFIER Composite Hours Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective: Dischame Perron Limit Over Limit Violation Violation d cauetuenb m IL IWIDay .911. Ibs/Dn gfL HxUD, Percent Over Type Oi18GreasBMin,[ Please address any questions concerning this report to Jim Benzie at 714-593-7444. a REVIEWED B�/ ,>d jaw yl��f9 -I a ORANGE COUNTY SANITATILLIJ DISTRICT March 2, 2000 o°enef LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER (7141982-2411 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM _111ne.ae:ee.� 1120 N. ARMANDO ST P.Q. B.B127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 fnunwin wilt CA 92728-8127 M. dale..: Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICT'S MONITORING 10544 aea awnae Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: November 30, 1999 F atata vanes.c1 82708-7B19 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 Based upon the enclosed Wastewater Analysis Report for Sample No. 231886 collected by the Orange County Sanitation District on 1113 0/1 9 9 9, your company was in violation of its permitted Memher Industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: •coca.. � Constituent(s)in Violation I Cu.. Oil&Grease Min. ,•d aim Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may result in B,9a additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to your company Bad.. Rn* being classified as Significantly Noncompliant(SNC). Should your company be classified as 0A"�B°B SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a significant violator. Fountain Way Aft'toa aarean [aora To verify that all necessary corrective measures have been taken to resolve the noncompliance. JRundn9an seen. the District will resam le our company's wastewater discharge in the near future. The followin o-d na P Yr9 9 Ld Raara summarizes the fees associated with the District's resampling your wastewater discharge: Le Palma Los aremitds N.Port Bade^ Laboratory Analysis Fee: $ 74 waage Non-compliance Processing&Sampling Fee: $ 500 Sena and seal eaadn Total Fee: $ 574 Stanton T°dn An invoice for the amount presented above will be sent to your company under separate Ylla P.& Please notify our Accounts Payable Department to assure time) ywta Linda N Y Y P y payment to avoid III . additional enforcement actions against your company. .q cr Grano. You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the noncompliance determination in �nitam oi.ormcs accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. caa18 Mat° If you have an ,.desbons,plesse telephone Jim Benzie at 714 593-7444. Midway oty.. Y YSW P ( ) Irvine Renc. Yrrlea Bennie Source Control Su ervisor c: OCSD Accounts Receivable OCSD Inspector-AC OCSD Engineer-JT 'Td Pletxt the PuW'o Hda/N end the EnMorvrwnt through Elcellence in Wes[ewe[ar SYseems- Orange County Sanitation District 1 OB44 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 a Source Control Division r WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT a• HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 0124/2000 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 'A ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 231886 INSPECTOR AC Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE 2C w Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: .+ Sample Date 11/30/1999 Time : Location: END OF PIPE-CLARIFIER Composite Hours a- Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective DiaeharBe Permit Limit Over Limit violation Violation s constitimma .9/1- Remo nji!j MbsMa gfL Ilx/Day Percent Cv r Type 008 Grease Min. 348.00 2D0.00 148.00 74.0 MAJOR Please address any questions concerning this report to Jim Benzie at 714-593-7444. REVIEWED BV a V / a P t� P Y ORANGE COUNTY SANITAT. . I DISTRICT � I June 5, 2003 1419M 2411 P14)lat sszosss LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER 9620 md.. HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM ties athi1m: 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. eD sex 8127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 d Intein Valley.G 9272&B127 meet mare..: Rsz 2 Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICT'S MONITORING 708-701s Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 6, 2003 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 r.mbn Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 612938 collected by • the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/0612003, your company was in violation of its cwa• permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: Anehelm ante Constituent(s) In Violation Buena Perk gE Total Toxic Organics nmin veroey wrapGi%noe Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may "' result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to o-�na ,r �Raare your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company Le Palma be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a �x�ywl significant violator. rasnae sece„ 41as You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance Seel seam determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. Stanton, wle P.*Park If yr have any questions, please telephone Kelly Christensen at (714)593-7420. I rose l.dlea �y ar Ornnge �� Kelly Christensen rm Di.erimi Principal Environmental Specialist r I Coate Mese Midway oty 019`rim c: OCSD Inspector- MR r I i ad Rene, OCSD Engineer - MSK To maintain world-class hamership in we4awatar and water resource management. Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 Source Control Division ^ WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 0527/2003 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 ANAHEIM. CA 92806 LAB NO. 612938 INSPECTOR MR Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE : 2 r Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: r Sample Date 05/06/2003 Time : 1115 Location Composite Hours Actual Discharge r Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective Discharge Permit Limlt Over Limit VI012ti0n Violation r Corntlt0enb mg/L IbVDay ^q/L Ibs av -QtL I1,9/DaV Percent Over TY`- 624 19.261 0.0 624-Misc. 6.990 0.0 r MTBE 0.009 0.00 0.0 T o.6e 1rse ; 2g1sr: T211r'93 r Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. REVIEWED BY r J r r r LU SSSC Interface Report-Completed Greem Sheen Green Sheet# 612938 Permit 2-1.079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM r LIMS# 612939 Collected by More Reideler Lab Released Date 5/23/03 624_SC r I 1,1,1-trichloroeWme < 7.60 UG_L 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroefbme < 6.40 UG_L 1,1,2-trichloroetbeoe < 7.20 UG_L _ I 1,1-dichloroetlmoe < 3.60 UG_L 1,1-dichloroetheoe < 27.60 UG_L 1,2dichlorobetamm < 5.20 UG_L r I 1,2-dichlorceth®e < 6.80 UG L 1,2-dichloroprigemm < 9.60 031 1,3-dichlorobeauae < 5.20 UG-L p 1,44ichlorobemame < 7.60 UG_L r I 2-butte n: 711.00 UG-L 2-chloroethylvmyl ether < 9.20 UG_L r I 2-hexao me: < 23.60 UGL me 4- t m hyl-2-peutaue 65.40 UG__L acemoe 3920.00 UG-L acroleio < 128.00 UGL M YIOmbra7e < 64.00 UG_L benzene < 4.00 UG_L . bromodicyommetyane < 8.80 UG_L bromoform < 8.40 UG_L r br momethane < 128.00 UG_L carbon duWfWe < 40.00 UG_L r carbon tetrachloride < 11.60 UGL chlorobemene < 4.80 UG_L chloroe0une < 160.00 UG_L chloroform 17.20 UGL �+ chloromethene < 140.00 UG__L cis-1,2-dichloroethene < 6.00 UG_L r I cis-1,3dichloropropeae < 8.40 UG L ddnomocbloromethmm < 12.80 UG_L eWylloomm a 206.00 UG_L r I n6p-xyl__ 1280.00 UG L methylene chloride < 44.00 UG_L M711H < 9.00 UG_L t o-xylene 987.00 UG_L en r I styre 26.60 UG_L tetrachloroethene < 12.40 UGL m I toluene 12000.00 UGL trans-1,2-dichloroethrne < 13.60 UG___L trane-1,3-dichloropropene < 9.00 UG_L oro_ I trichlethene 48.10 UGL trichlorof uoromethsne < 72.00 UGL vinyl acetate < 104.00 UG___L vinyl chloride < 116.00 UG_L r Led 5n*7M3 6:25 Results bvComoletdGSmt P.w 17 ,.r at ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT January 19, 2004 LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. ANAHEIM, CA 92806 Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: December 23, 2003 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 695078 collected by the Orange County Sanitation District on 12t23/2003, your company was in violation of its permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: Constituent(s) In Violation {$ti Total Toxic Organics Your company must take immediate action to cored this problem. Failure to do so may result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a significant violator. You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. _ If y0 he a any questions, please telephone Kelly Christensen at (714)593-7420. Kelly Christensen Source Control Supervisor c: OCSD Inspector- DF OCSD Engineer- MSK aY:F; . . . . - I I Orange County Sanitation District 108" Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 Source Control Division WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 01/13/2004 _ 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO : 2.1-079 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 695078 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE : 2 Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date 1 212 3/2 0 0 3 Time : Location : BELOW GROUND CLARI Composite Hours Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : Dbeharae Penult Limit Over Limit Violation Violation Constituents MQ/L Ibs/Dav rrq� Ib'fDav mQ/ Iba/Dav Percent Over T e 624 41,359 0.0 624-Ksc. 25.619 0.0 MiBE t�0..00200�y �T�,pe 0C.0�0 0.00Y Omo Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. REVIEWED BY I LIMS.SC Interface Report-Completed Green Sheers r Green Sheet a 695078 Permit 2-1-079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL 11NIFGRM .+ LIMS# 695078 Collected by David Francis LAb Released Date 1/12/04 624_SC ,r 1,1,1-trichloroethane < 19.00 UG_L 1,1,2,2-uruachloroethaae < 16.00 UG_L I 1,1,2-trichlomdumac 155.00 UG_L r 1,1-dichloroethsne < 9.00 UG_L 1,1-dhchlormthene < 69.00 UG_L 1,2-dichlaobenuae < 13.00 UG L ,r 1,2-dichloroethane < 17.00 UG L 1,2dhchloropropane < 480.00 UG_L I 1,3-dichlorobenzeae < 13.00 UG_L r 1,4-dichlorobenzeue < 19.00 UG L 2-butaaom, < 140.00 UG L 6 2-chloroetbylvinyl ether < 23.00 UG_L I2-h•-•Mrre 99.10 UG_L 4-methyl-2-peutanone < 43.00 UG L y acetone 15200.00 UG L Iacmlein < 320.00 UG L r acrylonitrile < 160.00 UG_L benzene < 10.00 UGL bromodichbromethece 27.60 UG__L bromoform < 21.00 UG_L I bromomethane < 320.00 UG L carbon disulfide < 100.00 UG L carbon tetrachloride < 29.00 UG L chlorobeneue < 12.00 UG_L chloroethatt < 400.00 UG_L chloroform 308.00 UG_L chloromethan < 350.00 UG_L cis-1,2-dichlowetheme < 15.00 UG_L r cis-1,3-dichloropropeoe < 21.00 UG_L dibromochloromerhane < 32.00 UG_L ethylbeozene 828.00 UG_L >r I m,p.xylwes 2370.00 UG_L melhylene chloride < 110.00 UG_L MTBE < 20.00 UG_L I o-xylene 7720.00 UG_L styreac 230.00 UG_L mtrachloroethene 8020.00 UG_L .r I toluene 6350.00 UGL trans-42-dichloroethene < 34.00 UG__L trans-1,3-dicbloropropene < 20.00 UG_L ,r I brichloroethene 51.20 UG_L trichloro0uoromethane < 180.00 UG_L vinyl acetate < 260.00 UG L r I1 vinyl chloride < 290.00 UG_L �1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITAI ..J DISTRICT � I per.°: June 23, 2004 a (7141962-2411 r LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER 1]141862d356 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM „ fff, ,,,,; 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PC a 6127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 amain Va ..GA 92728-8127 mNt tldnm: e44 Eli.Avenue Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING 927a6-7916 Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 27, 2004 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 M°e Mr Based upon the enclosed Wasiwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 749618 collected by • the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/27/2004, your company was in violation of its elsls permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: r I Maneim - Constituents) In Violation eee euane Pe k cypre_ Total Toxic organics F°.Wm W/W a o°„ l Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may tlngran seem result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to k b" our company beingclassified as Significantly li � Noncompliant SNC company Should our com L. d d6 be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a L.aeni009 significant violator. Ne-Pws 6eecn I You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance Senor Ane 6°al eeecn determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. Sramm� T19O° If you have an questions, lease telephone Kell Christensen at 714 593-7420. 14ne Par. Y Y 9 P P Y ( ) Yarn untle N Ynnye �Y" -- �' I Kelly Christensen Source Control Supervisor Cosa Mesa MiCwey Gry ue 01.mm� c: OCSD Inspector- DF o-vina a°ncn OCSD Engineer - MH �I rl Tv mam[am w°rltl-cl°ss ieatlersshp in was[ewa[er entl weer resource management. Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 r Source Control Division WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT r HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 06/10/2004 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 749618 INSPECTOR OF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE : 2 r Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: ,., Sample Date 0 512 7/2 0 0 4 Time : 0930 Location: CLARIFIER Composite Hours Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : Disebam Permit Lim tt Over Limlt Vlolatlon VI0lation ConatltuenLs -RIL IbWDav & IbstDav Ino/L Ibs/Oav Percent Over TvTW 624 65.770 0.0 MTBE < 0.052 0.00 0.0 s SEC- 1.280 0.0 BLITYLBENZENE r Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-693-7420. REVIEWED BY K r r rl / LIMS-SC Interface Report-Completed Green Sheets r ,st ces 749618 Permit 2-1-079 RAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM ;I UM IF 749619 Collected by David Francis Lab Released Daze 6/9/04 r 624 8C I 1,1,1,2-schachlormahane < 92.00 UG_L dibromomethane < 72.00 UG_L ,r 1,1,14richloroethane < 148.00 UG-L dichlorodifluoromethane < 1240.00 UGL 1 loro,1,2,2-tetrachethane < 44.00 UG L ethylbenzene 1470.00 UG_L 1,1,2-trichloroethane < 44.00 UGL henchlorobutadicne < 440.00 UG FL 1,1,2-erlchlorotri0uoroeth < 940.00 UGL isopropylbenzene 4990.00 UGL, l,ldichlomethane < 96.00 11G_L m,p-xylenes 8130.00 UG_L v 1,1-0ichlorccthcne < 220.00 UG L methyl teat-pentyl ether < 76.00 UGL j1,1-dichloropropene < 148.00 UG L methylene chloride < 72.00 UG L 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene < 249.00 UG_L M7BE < 52.00 UG L J 1,2,3-trichlompropme < 40.00 UGL naphthalene 1300.00 I16 L- 1,2,4-trichlombeazene < 88.00 UGL n-butylbenzene 3470.00 UG_L- 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 74200.00 UGL n-propyllimazene 17900.00 UG L J1,2dibromo-3-cbloropro < 112.00 UGL o-xylene 4600.00 UG L- 1,2dibromoethaue < 76.00 UGL sec-butylbeo-rene 1290.00 t$d L, 1,2dichlorobenzene < 30.00 UG-L styrene 103.00 UG FL 1,2-dichloroethane < 60.00 UGL tert-butyl alcohol < 2160.00 UG L 1,2-dichloropropane < 96.00 UG_L ten-butyl ethyl ether < 132.00 UG FL 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene 36200.00 UG L-� tert-butylbetzene < 128.00 UG L I 1,3-dichlorobenzene < 84.00 UG FL tebachloroethene < 88.00 Up L 1_1dichloropropane < 64.00 UG L toluene 64300.00 UG L, 1,4dichlorobezenme < I00.00 UG_L trans-1,2-dichloroethene < 120.00 UQ_L j2,2dichloropropane < 292,00 UGL trans.1,3dichloropropene < 164.00 UG L 2-butanane 596.00 UG-L trichloroedume < 132.00 I16 L 2-chlorcethylvmyl ether < 64.00 UG L trichloro0uoromethane < 1600.00 UG L 2-chlorotoluene < 100.00 UG L vinyl acetate < 256.00 116-L rl2-hezanone < 52.00 UG_L vinyl chloride < 760.00 UG FL 4-chlorotoluene < 72.00 UGL 4-isopropyltoluene 1040.00 UG_L'� J4-rnethyl-2-pentanone < 60.00 UG L acetone 3960.00 UG L acrolem < 4900.00 UG L acrylonitrile < 94.00 UGL benzene < 90.00 UG L bromobenzene < 84.00 UG L bromochloromethane < 172.00 UG_L bronnDi ichloromethane < 64.00 UGL bromoform < 68.00 UGL Jbromomethmte < 4400.00 UG__L carbon disulfide < 400.00 UG_L carbon tetrachloride < 136.00 UGL Jchloroberreene < 80.00 UGL chloroethane < 1000,00 UG__L chloroform < 84.00 UG_L chloromethane < 1280.00 UGL cis-1,2-dichloroethene < 80.00 UG__L cis-1,3-dichloropropene < 160.00 UG L dibronmchloromethane < 60.00 UG_L inted 6/10/2004 6:25 Results byComnletedGS.mt Pax 3a .,f 74 I ORANGE COUNTY SANITA71_A DISTRICT Ot419a2-241 ym..:1 June 23, 2004 � LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER ]t41992ms8 ....m4.®., HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM ait111, 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. Pa 9a.e127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 man W11W..ca r 92729-8127 .e..e.mlAui 8`9 Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING f e2roaaate Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 27, 2004 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 M.mW° Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 749619 collected by • the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/27/2004, your company was in violation of its MCI.. permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: "I I A"°"B1" Constituent(s) In Violation Brea Baena Pe k Oil 8 Grease Min. Yyy¢y oy„ G. Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may eaecn result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to our company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant ( ant SNC company Parma Should our com rraer. be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published the newspaper as a La significant violator. Basco Droops You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance Sent Ana ' sea e.aan determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. Stmmn If you have an questions, lease telephone Kell Christensen at 714 593-7420. tows Pant Y Y g P P Y ( ) Yarba L'nCe C s Kelly Christensen pry ol.ert.a. Source Control Supervisor r O�use 6M'tlway Otp ol.tHl c: OCSD Inspector- DF arms aan�n OCSD Engineer- MH rl ITo mem[ein w°rltl-class leatleren,p in wastewater and water resource management. a � i Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 Source Control Division WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT er HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 06/09/2004 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 749619 INSPECTOR OF a Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE 2 Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: e+ Sample Date 05/27/2004 Time : 0930 Location: CLARIFIER Composite Hours Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective: Oischam Pennll Limit Ova,Limit Violation Violation Conatitwnta . -a& IUD my Lr 61 a/OaV mNL Ihs/Dav Pa,eent O e TIM-8 OWN VOW now Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. REVIEWED BY a a a a Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 d Source Control Division SELF-MONITORING WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 03123/2005 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO : 2-1-079 d ANAHEIM. CA 92806 LAB NO. 539386 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE 5-2C a Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Ly Sample Date 1 211 3/20 0 4 Time : 1300 Location: SAMPLE SOX Composite Hours Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.02300 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective:05/01/2004 Diseharoa Permh Lim k Over Limit Violation Violation ae Conslkuents MUIL Ib Ibvoav m2IL ____v Percent Over Tvoa 624 0.692 0.0 d TOoaftl'Taxpq O. f'; ;yJ Q58"; 'BJf'I£,.:';° 19.3 MINOR e: Please address any questions concerning this report to Laurie von Winckelmann at 714-593-7411. REVIEWED BY� a v rr o✓ oy v+ W J � 'I Weck Laboratories, Inc 1 . ...... ..I....1 Environmental and Ana ha®1 SerNces-SitKe 1961 Report Date: Friday, January 7, 2005 Received Date: Tuesday, December 14,2004 Received Time: 4:10 pm Turnaround Time: Normal Client: Hawk Industrial Phone: (714) 630-8111 3001 E. La Palma Ave. FAX: (714)630A141 Anaheim, CA 92806 Attn: Larry Booher Project: 12-13-12-14-D4 P.O.#: Certificate of Analysis Work Order No: 4121111 1 Sample ED: Sample Box Matriz: Water Sampled By: Client Sampled: 12113/04 13:00 Sample Nate: Sample Be. Reportlog Aaalyle Result Qnsunen Uoib Dome.. U-H Method Prepared Aual3ad Bdid, Chlmomethalte..........................._.«......._65 up/I 10 10 EPA624 12115N4 IN16104 mt W501139 Vinyl chloride.......«..................................ND ug/1 10 10 EPA624 IV15N4 12/16N4 m WMI139 Bromometpane......................................34D ugll 10 10 EPA624 12/ISM 12/16N4 m W501139 I Chloroethane.....................«.....................M .,A 10 10 EPA624 IVISN4 12I16N4 mt W501139 rll Trichloro0uoromelhamt............................ND ug/l 10 10 EPA624 I2/15N4 IV16N4 mt W501139 1,1-Dichloroethene..........._.....................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 IV15N4 IV1604 mt W501139 Methylene chloride..**�.....«......................ND ug0 10 50 EPA624 IV15M IVI6 m1 W501139 tRns-1,2-DichlorOethene......._...............34D ug4 10 10 EPA624 IVISN4 IVI6 m W501139 1,1-Dichloroethane..t/............_..__..._.-.ND ug/I 10 10 EPA624 12/I904 12JI6104 mt W501139 Chloroform......../.1................................390 ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/I5N4 12/16104 m W501139 I,1,I-Trichlorcethate.4f................._.........ND uP/1 10 10 EPA624 12/15A4 12/I6/04 m1 W501139 Carbon tetrachloride................._.............ND ug/1 10 10 EPA624 12115M 12116004 mt W501139 Bmumme......#........................................ ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/1504 12/16/04 m W301139 ugA 10 10 EPA624 12115M WIM4 mt W501139 �+ Trichlometbene---Ai........_........_........... D ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/I5W 1211604 mt W5011139 up/I 10 10 EPA624 12/ISW IW1604 mt W501139 ugn 10 10 EPA624 12/15N4 12/16/04 mt W501139 .J 2-Chloroethylvhtyl edKL...«........._..........ND ugA 10 50 EPA624 IV15M 12/16N4 mt W501139 cis-1,3-Dlchloroprope ._,......«._..._._ND uga 10 10 EPA624 I2/15/04 IL16N4 m W501139 Toluene........................e............_...........ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12115104 12/1604 mt W501139 ay ttails-1,3-Dichloropropene....._........_.......ND ug/l 10 10 EPA 624 12/15M 12/16/04 mt W501139 1,1,2-Trichioroethene...+........................No ugA 10 10 WA 624 12/1501 IV16M mt W501139 Tenachlorcethene....._ ................_........ND u01 10 10 WA 624 12/15N4 D/I604 mt W501139 Dibromochloromethang.................._...........ND ugli 10 10 EPA624 12/ISO4 12/1604 mt W501139 s Chlomben2ene........................._.«..............ND ugA 10 10 WA 624 12/1501 12/16M4 mt W501139 Ethylbenzene....... .. ......... ug/I 10 10 EPA624 12/150/ 12/16N4 mt W3111139 Bromoform.................................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 121ISM IW16N4 mt W501139 1,1,2,2-TeneChloroetigna........................._ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12115M 12116004 mt W501139 m-Dlchlorobennene.....................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/15M 12/16104 mt W501139 p-Dichloroben2ene.......................-.............a2 ug/I to 10 EPA624 12/1504 12/16*4 mt W501139 ^'4 o-Dichlorobenzene........................._...........ND ug/l 10 10 EPA624 12/156M 12/16/04 mt WW1139 Lab4: 4121444 Page 1 of 5 14859 East Clark Avenue,City of Industry,California 91745-1396 (626)336-2139 FAX (626)336-2634 `� W .weckiabs.com I Will 1111L Weck Laboratories, Inc. mm IMtRO ual and An t"cel Servket-sl l 1964 -+ Certificate of Analysis J Work Order No: 4121444-01 Semple m: Sample Bo: Matrix: Water Sampled By: Client Sampled:1211310413:00 Sample Now Sample an Reporting Aealyte Result Qaannen Units DOution 13m1t Mediae! Prepared Avalyeml Batsb Acroichl.......................................................ND ue/1 10 too EPA624 IVIS/04 12116/04 mt W501139 JAcrylonitrile................................................ND ugA to too EPA 624 12/15/04 12/16M out W501139 Surrogate: 1,1-Diehlo lhane-d4 107% 66-136 EPA624 IVIS104 IV16104 mt W501139 Surrogate:4-Broonaluorobemene 108% 79-119 EPA624 12115104 12/16/04 m1 W501139 Surrogate:Toluene-d8 90.0% 86-118 EPA624 11115104 12/16104 m1 W501139 Work order No: 4121444-02 Sample ID: Sample Box Matrix: Water Sampled By: Client Sampled:12/13/U4 16:00 Sample Note: Sample Bo: y Reporting Aualyte Result QuellOen Units Dawson Wmh Method Prepared Aeniyxrd Beach Chloromethane...........................................J1 ugn to 10 EPA624 IV15/04 IV16104 on W501139 Vinyl chloride..............................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/1501 IV16104 an W501139 Bromomethane............................................ND ugn 10 10 EPA624 12115M 12/16M mi W501139 Chloroethane...............................................ND salt 10 10 EPA624 IVIS/04 12/16M an WMI139 TrichloroBuoromethaoe...............................ND ug/1 10 10 EPA624 ]V15104 12/16104 mt W501139 1,1-Dlchloroethene......................................ND uBn 10 10 EPA624 II/15/04 12/16814 mt W501139 Methyleae chloride......................................ND ugn 10 50 EPA624 12/15/04 12116104 an W501139 hens-1,2-D'1lchlorcethene.............................ND sell 10 10 EPA624 IVIS/04 12/16/04 est W501139 r 1,1-Dichloroethane......................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16/04 on W301139 Chloroform..................................................970 USA 10 10 EPA624 IVIS104 12/16m4 mt W501139 1,1,1-Trichloroethome..................................ND ug/l 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16/04 on W501139 r Carbon tetrachloride....................................ND u6dl IO 10 EPA624 IVIS104 12116M an W501139 Belamne.......................................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 IV15104 12/16M mt W501139 1,2-Dlchicrand me......................................ND ugn 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 IV16/04 m1 WM1139 .y Trichloroethene...........................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 IV16104 an W501139 1,2-Dichioropropene....................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/1L not W501139 Bromodichloromethetle...............................32 ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16/04 ent W501139 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether..............................ND U94 10 50 EPA624 12/15/04 12/I6M4 out W501139 cis-1,3-Dlchloropropeae..............................ND u9/1 10 10 EPA 624 12/15m4 12/16104 mt W501139 Toluene........................................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 lV15/04 1NI6104 ent W501139 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene...........................ND u8/1 10 10 EPA624 12/I301 12116104 m1 W501139 1,1,2-Trichloroethane..................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/13/04 12/16/04 mt W501139 Tetrachloroetheae........................................ND ug/I 10 10 EPA624 12/15/04 12/16AM on WSo 1139 Dibrorticehlorolnethane...............................i1 up] 10 10 EPA624 IV15104 12116A4 no W501139 Chlorobemmne.............................................ND ug4 10 10 EPA624 IV15104 12/16/04 m1 WSO1139 Ethylben2ene...............................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/I3104 12/16/04 m1 W501139 Bromolbrm..................................................ND ug/1 10 10 EPA624 IVIS104 12/16/04 mt W501139 — 1,1,2,2-Tetmchlorcedwe............................ND an 10 10 EPA624 12115104 12/16/04 on W501139 m-Dichlorobennne......................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/1904 12JI6104 mt W301139 p-Dlchlorobe112ene......................................ND u9/1 10 10 EPA624 IV15104 12/16/04 on W501139 r ODichlorobemzane......................................ND ug/1 10 10 EPA624 IV15104 12/16/04 no WS01 t39 Lab#: 4121444 Page 2 of 5 14859 East Clark Avenue,City of Industry,California 91745-1396 (626)336-2139 FAX (626)336-2634 ~u.wecklabs.com W , L Weck Laboratories, Inc. 1' �....1 1111111 Erwimrulenbl and AnalWol Services-Since 1964 w+ Certificate Of Analysis s Work Order No: 4121444.02 Simple In Sampplele Bo: Matrh: Water Sampled Dr. Client Seattle :lY13AN 16:OD Sample Note Sample Bear Reporting Aaa131e Hach Qma&n Ualb Madan Iidt Method PreryeN A-b.W Belch ~ Acrolefin.......................................................ND ua0 10 too EPA624 ]VIM IVI6104 ml W501139 AcrylonitrIle................................................ND .9n 10 too EPA 624 IVI5100 IV16104 ml WMI 139 4w Swrogme:1.1-Dwhlormharle-04 110% 66-136 EPA 624 12115/04 1211604 ear W501139 SwMw,:4-Beoaofluorober - 112% 79-119 EPA 624 12115104 12116M4 m1 W501139 Swrogme: Tduene-08 94.2% 86-118 EPA 624 IVISM4 1211604 m1 W501139 ar Wmk OrdwNm 4121ai4-0 Sample me sample Bo: M.o-ur Walter S®pled By: CUM Sampkd:1211410407.00 Sample Note Smapk Bm as "Nm"a6 Awlyle Bemh QmBgea Uulb Dead. IJmtl Method Pretested Avab d Baba Chloromethane.............................................18 egg 10 10 EPA 624 IVISM4 12116104 an W501139 a Vinyl chloride..............................................ND u611 10 10 EPA 624 IVI5r04 IV16M m1 W501139 BIolllorDethane............................................ND ugn 10 10 EPA 624 IVIS/04 I7116N4 mt W501139 Chlmoed,n,,....................................._.......ND WA 10 t0 EPA624 IVISAN IVI604 an W301139 Trichlorofluoromedwere...............................ND WA 10 10 EPA624 IV15N4 IVI6T4 net WS01139 ~ 1,1-Dlchloroelhm......................................ND WA 10 10 EPA 624 IVISAN I2/16104 w W501139 Me01ylemechloride......................................ND "A 10 50 EPA 624 I2115104 I2116104 at W501139 trans-1,2-Dichloroedumm:.............................ND -on 10 10 EPA624 I211504 I2/1604 w WS01139 1,1-Dlchloroethene......................................ND 01/1 10 10 EPA 624 IV15A04 IV16104 ml WS01139 ChImform..................................................380 ugfl 10 10 WA 624 IVIS104 I2116004 m1 W501139 1,1,1-Trlchloloethene..................................ND ug/1 10 10 EPA 624 IV15/04 12/I604 mI WS01139 ad Carbon tetrachloride...................................ND .94 10 10 EPA 624 IV15/04 IV1600 an W501139 Benzene.......................................................ND ugn 10 10 EPA 624 I2/I5.04 I2/1604 we W501139 1,2-Dichloroethane......................................ND "n 10 to EPA 624 IVISM4 IV16/04 w WS01139 ,a, Trichloroedme...........................................ND 00 10 10 EPA 624 IVISM4 IV1604 w W501139 1,2-Dichloropmpane...................................ND "A 10 10 EPA We I2/I504 I2/1604 ea WS01139 Bromodichlorometleme...............................23 agn 10 10 EPA 624 IVI5104 I2/I604 m1 W501139 2-Chlornethylvinyl ether_............................ND nA 10 50 EPA 624 I2/I5A4 I211604 an W501139 cis-1,3-DlchImproperle..............................ND -0 10 10 EPA 624 I2/15M IVI600 an W501139 Tolunle........................................................ND u9/1 10 10 EPA 624 IVISAM IV16M w W501139 bans-1,3-D'Ichlolopropene...........................ND v911 10 10 EPA 624 IVISAN IV1604 en W501139 ~ 1,1,2-Trichloloelhan...................................ND ug4 10 10 EPA 624 IVI514 IV16M met W501139 TenwIloroethene........................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 I2/I5104 IV16/04 an WS01139 Dibromochloromelhane...............................ND nn 10 10 EPA 624 I2)I594 IV16M an WMI 139 ~ Chlorobenzere................._..........................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 I2/I5/04 I2116W ml W501139 F.dlylbemene........................................_.....ND "In 10 10 EPA 624 IVISM I2/I604 an W501139 BromofOrm..................................................ND aftl 10 10 EPA 624 I2/15104 I2116104 mI W501139 Pa 1,1,2,2-Tehechloroe01m1e............................ND upff 10 10 EPA 624 I2/I5iO4 I2/16.04 an WS01139 na-Dichlorobenaene.....................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 I21I5/04 IVI604 MI W501139 p-Dlchlombenzene......................................12 ugA 10 10 EPA 624 IVUiUl I2/16004 an W501139 tero-Dichloroben2erle......................................ND u9/1 10 10 EPA 624 I2115/04 I2/1604 an W501139 :abd: 4121444 Page 3 of 5 14959 East Clark Avenue,City of Industry,California 91745.1396 (626)336-2139 FAX (626)336-2634 W W W.Wecklabs.conm J J WL Weck Laboratories, Inc. Ernuanlnenbl and Anal,tlol ScrAces-Sine 1964 Certificate of Analysis Jwork Order No: 4/2144401 Sample M, Sample Boa m1driv wow Sampled By: client Sampled:12n4N407:00 Sample Note: Sample Boa JBWmdae Ann" Small QMHUM Delft Dowries 1AW1 Medmd Preputl Analysed Sauk Acrolebl.......................................................ND ug4 10 too EPA624 12115AM 12/16AM ml W501139 Amylonitrile................................................ND vgl 10 100 EPA624 12/15104 12/1604 mt WMI 139 Surrogalr: 1.2-Dwhlarorlbmre-d4 108% 66-136 EPA 624 1211514 121/6104 mr W501139 Surrogare:4-BromoJlewolarme:u 110% 79-119 EPA 624 12115104 12/16104 mr W501139 JSurrogare:Toluene-& 93.2% 86-118 EPA 624 IV13M 12/1&04 mr WJOI139 J Work Order N. 4121444-04 Sample B3e 8m oa M Bahtr: WOW Sampled B7: CNN Sampled:W14104 00:00 Sample NoOz Sample Boa RCPwft Aealyh Bush QaeBOem Dmh Dtletlw IImm Meow Prepared Analyzed Beak JChloromethme............................................ND u&A 10 10 EPA 624 I2115M 12/16M4 m WM1139 Vinyl chloride..............................................ND 44 10 10 EPA 624 12/I904 12/I604 nn W501139 Brorllomedume............................................ND %4 10 10 EPA 624 12/I5A4 12/W04 na W501139 JCWoroedmne...............................................ND agA 10 10 EPA 624 12/13:94 12/16AM m W501139 Trichlomfluoromethme...............................ND uyl 10 10 EPA 624 12/I5M 12/I6104 m1 W501139 ,1-Dichkn3mlhmm......................................ND 00 10 10 EPA 624 12/15N4 12/16A4 rn W501139 JMethylene chloride......................................ND &A 10 50 EPA 624 12/15:04 12116004 e6 W501139 trans-1,2-Dlchlor0et11me.............................ND uyl 10 10 EPA 624 MUM 1211604 m: W501139 1,1-Dichlor0odms......................................ND 44 10 10 EPA 624 12/I5M 12/16/04 ne W501139 Chloroform..................................................800 ugA 10 10 EPA 624 IV15004 12116104 an W501139 1,1,I-Trichlorodharm.................................ND "A 10 10 EPA 624 lVl5AI4 12/1604 an WSO1139 J Carbon tetrachloride....................................ND ug/l 10 10 EPA 624 12/I5N4 12/1604 an W501139 Beuune.......................................................ND 054 10 10 EPA 624 1N15A4 1N161114 an W501139 1,2-Dichloroethene......................................ND 44 10 10 EPA 624 12115,04 12116AN an W501139 r Trichloroetberle...........................................ND agA 10 10 EPA 624 12/I504 12/16AN an W501139 1,2-Dichloeopropmre.....-............................ND USA 10 10 EPA 624 12115M 12/16000 nn WS01139 ! Bromodichl0mmelhme...............................47 vy1 10 10 EPA 624 IV15AM 12/16AM as W501139 r 2-Chloroelhylvhlyl ether..............................ND ug/l 10 50 EPA 624 12/15A4 12/16/04 m: W501139 cis-1,3-Dlchlompaolmle..............................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 IVISN4 W16W m: W501139 Toluene........................................................ND v#A 10 10 EPA 624 12/15AM 12/16AM rr4 W5O1139 tans-1,3-Dlchloropropene.........-................ND uMA 10 10 EPA 624 IV15 M 12116194 m W501139 1,1,2-Trichloroedme..................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 12/I5A4 12/1604 m W501139 Te69chlo:0ethe11e........................................ND ugll 10 10 EPA 624 12115M 12/16M4 en W501139 Dibromochloromethane...............................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 12115AM 12/16104 mt W501139 Chlorobenane.............................................ND .5n 10 10 EPA 624 12/15/04 12116004 m W501139 EOrylben]ene...............................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA624 12/15A4 12/16104 ml W501139 Blnrllofomn..................................................ND -SA 10 10 EPA 624 12/15/04 12/16004 an W501119 " 1,1,2,2-Tmrachloroetham............................ND ogn 10 10 EPA 624 12115A4 12/16/04 m1 W501139 m-DlchlorobeNene.....................................ND ug/1 10 10 EPA624 12115104 12/16/04 N W501139 p-Dichlorobervmle.......................................12 u9A 10 10 EPA 624 12/15AM 12/16/04 mt W501139 r o-Dlchl0roben2me......................................ND ugA 10 10 EPA 624 12/15M 12116104 an W501139 Iabd: 4121444 Page 4 of 5 ,r 14859 East Clark Avenue,City of Industry,California 91745-1396 (626)336-2139 FAX (626)336.2634 W W W.wcvklabs.com i W11� L Weck Laboratories, Inc. Tq Erwimnmenbl and Analytical Services-Since 1964 -+I Certificate of Analysis J Warkorder No: 412lidi nd Sam yyk m: So pit Boz Matrix: Water Sampled By: Client r4:11:1311"O8:00 Samph:Note: Sample Box Report" Aaalyle Result QuRRerr Unite BUutimt Limit Method Prepared Analyzed Rateh Acrolein.......................... ND arA 10 100 EPA624 IV15M 12/I604 an W501139 Aerylonitrile................................................34D ugA 10 I00 EPA 624 IV15/04 12/16104 an W501139 Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroelhae-W 110% 66-136 EPA 624 12115104 1211N04 at W501I39 Surrogate:4-Eramofluorobenzene 108% 79-119 EPA 624 12/15/04 IV16104 cal W501139 Surrogate: Toluene-d8 94.0% 86-118 EPA 624 1LINU IL16t04 an W50JI39 Authorized Signature ELAP a 1132 LACSDContact:Jayne Kannin (Prgecl Manager) NELAC a 04229 NELAC#04229DA The rcm/n in then report applym red mmples amfy_ed/n accordance with the chain ojcuuody document Weck to neawtes oen#as thal the tell resale mar all wi rtqulremenrr oJNEWCnnleu rested in lhr Cam Narrative. Thu mmyrlral npwr moat br nprodured/n lu enany. Note: me Chain ofCmtoby document is per,of ue analytical report. w, Any remaining samples)fen lading will be disposed ofoac month from Nc final report date unlers mM1mamngemmn are made in advmtt. All results are expressed on was weight basis unlw otherwise specified. ND=Not de ncted,below the reponing limit. Sub=Subroenacted snalysh,original mon enelond. r If sample cellectad by Week Laboratories,sampled in eccordmce to his SOP MI5002 Rest for Date Qualifiers: we we ti ti wo ma Lab#: 412" Page 5 of 5 no, 14859 East Clark Avenue,City of Industry,California 91745-1396 (626)336-2139 FAX (626)336.2634 W Ww.wecklabs.corn ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT _ I ems: November 21, 2005 171 41 9 52-2 411 r•" LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER 'y [714)992m56 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM ®•q Wm.: 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. _ Ra 5m11127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 remain WV,..G 9272B-8127 ' EI r ' � °M A. Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING ram cn 92 92708-7oe�7a+e Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: October 25, 2005 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 n Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 879129 collected by • the Orange County Sanitation District on 10/25/2005, your company was in violation of its emi.. permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: Constituent(s) In Violation _ I Brea B ens Pa k creLS Total TOYIC Organics Fountain W)" FW1e Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may B result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to 1r your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company a He Me La PNma be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a Lae aamirae significant violator. r Mwo=Bean claw v1a=soda You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance seei ee�n determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. vn _ IAna Park It you have any questions, please telephone Kelly Christensen at (714)593-7420. vorOs Line. /� wxr .r OruBe II Kelly Christensen _ twtr e1..M4e. Source Control Supervisor r Costa Mesa M,ewey Gry ^. Ms.t oi•ar'�• c: OCSD Inspector - DF t,Nna aan=n OCSD Engineer- MH _ I _ Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 Source Control Division WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 11/08/2005 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 ANAHEIM,CA 92806 LAB NO. 879129 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE : 2 Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: d Sample Date 10/25/2005 Time : 0850 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours s Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : Dlxfm Permit Limit Over Limn Vloletlon Violation comotuerns mial Ins/Oav " Ie> MWIL 1I P.—rn Over TwM 624 3.913 0.0 r Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. REVIEWED BY m I. 2-1-079 LU3.S.SC Ime Report-fnmpkiM G.Sham Grua sheen 879129 Pmmlt 2-1-079 HAWK INDUS7RIAI.UNIFORM LIMSa 879129 Collared by David Fraads R ved inls610=1005 1:37:13PMm2.4-C Lab RclecM Date 11/7/05 ft,.bk onaak Compovvdt, Gf1616 Method:EPA 624 Analysis Dale 10282005 m,p-xylenes 65.00 UG_L 1,1,1,2-tebachimodharm < 2.40 UG_ mL medbyl Jmwyl ether < 1.00 UG L 1,1,7.piablmoethaoe < 2.20 UG_L mehylebechl aide < 10.40 UG L 1,1,2,24dmcAlwwa=e < 210 UG L M1BE < 6-20 UG L ® 1,Ij4r110lotocthae 3.44 UG_L nephthaleoe < 9.40 UG_L 1,1,2ticblombri0oomethane < 11.90 UG_L n-bmylbevrae 13.60 UG_L I,Idi.wmvetlm < 4.6D UGL n-propylbe a 76.40 UG_L I,Idichlmoethme < 13.40 UG_L o-aylene 32.90 UG L I,ldiddompropwe < 4.00 UGL see-butyibeo>ae < 5.60 UG_L 1,2,3-trichlmobeamne < 4.OD UG_L stae p < 19.00 UGL 1,2,3-mcWompmpm e < 3.60 UG_L tart-butyl alcohol < s0.00 UGL r 1,2,4&icAlombm < 520 UGL =bmyl ethyl ether < 5.60 UG_L 1,2,4-bdmdhylbenane 303.00 UG_L lertbmy%cn ae < 4.60 UG L 1,2-dibmm 3-cLlompmpae < 3.60 UGL teaublemelheoe 737 UG L U-clibrmnoeth. < 2.20 UG L mh= 201.00 UG_L 1,24.WM-hennme < 4.00 UGL tr 1,2dichlomeheoe < 11.20 UG L 1,24cldmomhana < 4.00 UG L trms-43dichI mpmpeae < 4.40 UG L 1,2-0ichlmopop= < 2.20 UGL Riehloroeheoe 7.60 UGL 1,3,5-trimeWylbeoaoe 122.00 UGL mda mfluammeth. < 19.60 UG L 1,34chl mbvazrne < 3.90 UG_L vinyl axlam < 15.80 UG_L 1,34cNompopam < 220 UGL vinyl cwotide < 6.60 UG_L 1,4diddombenrme < 4.40 UGL Analysis Date 11/04/2005 2,2dicLlompnpane < 920 UGL chlmofa L590.OD UG_L 2-bwanom 704.00 UG_L 2-chlmomhylvinyl ether < 3.00 UGL 2-chk t l net < 4.40 UG L 2-ho®oee < 4.20 UGL 4-chlmomlume < 3.40 UG-L 4-isopopylml. < 4.20 UGL 4-methy1-2-pem=om < 7.40 UG L =wnc 731.00 UG-L a=km < 30.00 UG_L ,r wyl®itrile 14.70 UG_L bmeae < 220 UG-L bmmohemene < 2.80 UG L bromwNommehme < 4.90 UGL bmmodicblommehae 633 UG_L bmmofmm 5.04 UGL bma m cd ae < 11.00 UGL carboa disulfide < 4.20 UGL carbon mbwhloride < 6.60 UG L chlombecvaR < 3.60 UG L ® chlm dmne < 8.30 UG L chlommetharm < 10.60 UG L cis-1,2dichlomed=e < Z40 UG L cis-1,3dicMompmpmt < SAO UG L dlbrmvmWommed� 4.77 UG L dibr mm cd mte < 320 UG L diddorudi0uammethane < 36.00 UG L ,., ethylbe HAD UG L hetarhlombumdirne < 6M UG-L isopr pylbevme 13.50 UG L Pared I I/L'"S 6:15 R®dh_byComplmdGS.rq Pap n of 65 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT _ I r I YMn.. August 1, 2006 171 41 9 82-241 1 1i' LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER r (714)962d356 a...,..m.cnm HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. P.O em 6121 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 r PounL9 Valley. 9272a-a12727 W 0644 Ellis Avenue Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICT'S MONITORING uMain Valley.M 92708-7018 Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 10, 2006 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 r Apnvi rs Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 922609 collected by • the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/10/2006, your company was in violation of its _ cm.. permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: A.ham Constituent(s) In Violation area 9uem Perk Total Toxic Organics r Cy .s Fcuntan Valley F"Perm" Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may careen i, r nungron eae,:h result in additional enforcement action against your company, Including, but not limited to 'r your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company La "awes Palma be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a a Loa Alan"L°a significant violator. y Alewpw[Beech Orange R.caw. You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance .sea Beach determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. $ Mca iu4en If you have any questions, please telephone Kelly Christensen at (714)593-7420. Nile Park wGe L,nes � mnLY .r ar.nae Kelly Christensen Im.ry obcrlc.. Source Control Supervisor _ Casrn Mes, M,eway G[y �_r Districts c: OCSD Inspector- DF o-�,nr Pancn OCSD Engineer- MH _ I rl Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,California 92728-8127 ,^ (714)962-2411 Source Control Division rr WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 07/31/2006 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 r' ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 922609 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE 2 Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: ~ Sample Date 05/10/2006 Time : 1120 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours r Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : Dilich.roa Permit Limit Over Limit Violation Violation Constllaents -511L Iba/Dsv nuia- Ib.0, MAIL te!(A37! Parton over T, Yrsb 624 SC 3,575 0.0 w Total Twdc 1638 :'0.58 1.06 organics Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420, REVIEWED BY g - 1 - 2-1-079 uMsscmtaeaRepon-Complev4 Green sbao G.sleet 0 922609 Panne 2.1-079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM LIMS 0 922609 Collcmd by David Francis PaeivW N Isb 5/102006 124:12PM v 0.2 Y Let,8cleased Date 524/06 PmBnba Or3eelc Campoenda GC" Method:EPA 624 Analysis Data 05/122006 dichlorodi0uororrethane < 36.00 UG_L 1,1,1,2-tetnhlorcethane < 2.40 UG L ethyl acnare < 10.00 UG_L 1,I,1-triddoramm< < 220 UG_L ethylbenrme 24.30 UG_L I,123-tetradilomethaae < 220 UG_L heaachlmobutadime < 6.90 UG L 1,1,2-trirhloroemsne < 240 UG_L iwpropyl aamle < 20.00 UG:L 1,12-trichloroMOuoroemmc < 11.80 UGL isopropyl ether < 20.00 UG L 1,1dichlorathene < 4.60 UG L isopmpylbervene 26.70 UGL 1,1-0ichlomethene < 13.40 UG_L m,p•xyle es 99.70 UG L 1,14chlorvprapmc < 4.00 UGL methyl formate < 20.00 UG L 1,2,3-Richlomb. < 4.00 UG_L methyl ten-pentyl ether < 1.00 UG L w 1,2,3-tricldoropmpme < 3.60 UG_L methylene chloride < 10.40 UG-L 12,4-tzichlorobemme < 520 DO L MTBE < 6.20 UGL 12.4-trimcthylbemooe 922.00 UGL n aveyl acetate < 20.00 UG L 1 2dibrom m o-3-chlopmpaae < 3.60 UG_L naphthalene, 20.10 UG_L N 12-0lbmmocthane < 2.20 UGL n-bmyl calve < 20.00 UG_L 12•mcblomb.e < 4.00 UGL n-butylbwme 26.00 UGL 1,24cblometham < 4.00 UGL n-hepmne 5130 UG_L 12dichloropropme < 220 UGL n4texme < 20.OD UG-L 1,3,5-trirhlorobtruete < 200 UGL n-pentane < 40.00 UG-L 1,3,5-trimethylbenane 296.00 UG-L o-In pylbmrme 161.00 UG L 1,34thlorobcosmc < 3.80 UGL o-zyleoe 6820 UG L 1,3dichlompmptne < 2.20 UG L see-hutylhmaene 9.66 UGL 1,44c30brob. < 4.40 UGL styrene < 19.00 UGL Ichlorn-2-Bocrobcnrse < 2.00 UG L tort-butyl alcohol < 80.00 Ut L 22dichloropropme < 920 UGL mot-butyl ethyl ether < 5.60 UGL 2-0utanane 75.80 UO L ten-butylbeozme < 4.60 UG__L 2-chlotoahylvinyl ether < 3.00 UGL tebaddoraethene 243 UG_L 2-chlorvmluea < 4.40 UGL tebehydrofivm < 20.00 UG_L I" 2.hc. a < 4.20 UO L mlueoe 1,400.00 UG_L 4-chlmoma lue < 3.40 UGL arms-12d m lchlocthene < 1120 UG L 4-isopropylmluene 8.98 UG L ban,1,34drlompropme < 4.40 UG L 44whyl-2-pentmone < 7.40 UGL trichl0mnhene 74.90 UG L eatocc I" UGL wichlorolunromethecee < 19.60 UG_L o aolein < 30AD UGL vinyl aoetve < 15.80 UG_L ecrylonibile < 13AO UGL vinyl chloride < 6.60 UG_L r' bevme < 220 UG L bromcberaene < 2n UG L bmmochlommedwm < - 4.116 - UO L bmmodichlm0melhane 333 UGL bmmofonn < 2m UG__L bmmomethane < IIAD UO_L carbon disulfide < 420 UG L carbon tebachlmide < 6,60 UG_L chlorobenzene < 3A9 UG_L chloramvie < $a UG_L r. chloroform 140A0 UG_L chlbmmethene < IOAD UG_L a 1.2dmhlametMu < 2.40 UG_L as-1.3-dichlmopropene < SAD UG L rydoheeaa < IOAO UG_L dibmmochloromcdume 3.04 UG-L �` bb...th.a 320 UG_L ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT � I _ I _ I ,aa a: August t, zoos 1714)SI2-2411 raa' LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER (7141962U356 www,ae.a,mm HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. en ea.e1z7 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 untain Vanay.CA 9272a-6127 .bass.aan,..: a44 si,.A�.nue Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICT'S MONITORING 92 n vanes,cA 92706-7G1B Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 23, 2006 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 p:nw rr Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 926064 collected by • the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/23/2006,your company was in violation of its r Max permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: Mahasn Constituent(s) In Violation arcs a.arw a Total Toxic Organics r W Ly y Faunte,n VNe F.A.rt.n Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may I Gsrtlan Grove txwngt4n 9asch result in additional enforcement action against your company, Including, but not limited to °a' I kwm your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company . P an F be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a ioa aam4.. significant violator. A Won asach Grange wac.n.. You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance snn��n determination In accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. r ( Ste T. " If you have any questions, please telephone Kelly Christensen at (714)593-7420. ✓Ns Perk d LnaY al Onnya �� t Y"C"' Kelly Christensen Source Control Supervisor c.r Md. Mesa M�tlaY Gry ...r ol. H.t. ;: OCSD Inspector - DF OCSD Engineer - MH r Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 s (714)962-2411 Source Control Division r WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT .y HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 07/31/2006 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2.1.079 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 926064 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE : 2 Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date 05/23/2006 Time : 0700 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours s Actual Discharge Mass Emmiesion Rate Flow Base : 0.000D0 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective: eleohame Permit Llmlt Over Limit Violation VlolMlon Conetitaente MS& 10s 13-v rMr aI IbflDov rMr 21 lbam. Pm t Over Tj 624_SC 67.209 0.0 ,. Taal TOxio IC377 0.60; OrBaalfB , Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. REVIEWED BY N V/ e✓ v� I 2-1-079 IJMSSC lakrh¢Rcpem-CwepMed Gn Sti. G.SbMp 926064 ftmt 2-1-079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM LIMS N 9260M Ca11ecm4 by Devil Francis Receivm m lab 5232006 1:29:32PM w 1.3-C lab ReWwd 0am N2/06 PoRubk Orpvk Cumpaaa6 GCJ66 Memod:EPA 624 Analysis Dam 05242006 ethyl awmm < 100.00 UG-L s 1,1,1,2.teuachlmoethme < 24.00 UGL ahylbemme 735.00 UG L I,l,l-kicbloroc a < 22.00 UGL h..W.n niadiew < 66.00 I1C L 1,1j,24ebacydnmethme < 22.00 tP L isopropyl ao:tem < 200.00 U13L 1,1,2-uicblomeNme < 24.00 UG L isopropyl ether < 200.00 IXi_L 1,1,2-tricblmoM luam d- < 118.00 UGL isapmpylb.. 1,180.00 UGL I,ldiddometh. < 46.00 UGL m,paylcecs 2,910.00 UG L I,Idichloroelhme < 134.00 UGL methyl fonnaw < 200.00 UGL LI-dichlwvpm c < 40.00 UGL methyl mtymtyl amen < 10.00 UGL I a,3-triddambenuae < 40.00 UGL methylene chloride < 104.00 UG-J. 1,2,3-ai.W.,opmpme < 36.00 UQ_L MTBE < 6200 UGL rs 1,2,44nchIombemme < 52.00 UGL n-amyl si e < 200.00 UG L 1,2dibnnn -3chlampmpaoe < 36.00 UGL naphdialeoc 761.00 UG L 1,2dibmmoe0tene < 22.00 UGL nbutyl m¢Ime < 200.00 UG L 1,2dichlmobeoanc < 40.00 UGL nbutylbenumic 1,370.00 UGL r 1,2.4rhlometbme < 40.00 UGL n4x plme 2,060.00 UGL 1,2dichloropmpme < 22.00 UG_L n-hexaae < 200.00 UG L 1,354aichlombw < 20.00 UGL o-pmtme < 400.00 UO L N 1,3,54immhylb c 10,200.00 UGL n-pmpylb. 5,420.00 UGL 134ddambcmme < 39,00 UGL o-aylme 1,590.00 UG L 1,34ddmapmpene < 2200 UGL seo•burylbeo}ae 393.00 UG L 1,44rhlorobemrne < 44.00 UGL styrene < 190.00 UGL 1<1,1 o 2-0mrobavene < 20.00 UGL ma-butyl alwhol < 800.00 UGL 2,24ddmopropme < 92.00 UGL ten-butylethylether < 56.00 UG L 2-bal < 300.00 UGL mn-butyr w c < 46.00 UG L T^ 2<Womethylvinyl ether < 30.00 UGL mnedilometheme 47.60 UG L 2-chlomtoluene < 44.00 UG L mmahydm6um < 200.00 UG L 2-heamwne < 4200 UG_L mi. 9,290.00 UG L Kh 4lom ueoe tol < 34.00 UGL tr 1,2diddwoelhme < 112.00 UG_L 4-isoprmMlusne 393.00 UGL vans-Lldlchlompmpme < 44.00 UG L 4-methyl-2-pmtmow < 74.00 UG L bichlameth m 1,240.00 UG L acetone 2170.00 UGL trirhlom0umomerFme < 196.00 UG L 1• eaolein < 300.00 UGL vinyl esmm < 158.00 UG_L emylmnioile < 136.00 UG L vinyl chlonde < 66,00 UG_L bmumc < 2200 UGL Analysis Date 05252006 ay bmmob.c < 26.00 UGL %2,4.uimelhylba 17,100.00 UG L bmmochl...Nmc < 48.00 l/G_L bmmodiddorwnmbmm < 12.00 UG_L bmmoform < 29.00 UG_L 'P bmmommham < 110.00 UG_L carbon disulfide < 4200 UG L carbon m .hl.nde < 66.00 UG L T" chlamb�e < 36.00 UG L chlomethwm < MOD UG L chlomfomt 64.40 UG L chlommedwe < 106.00 UG L r cis-L2-diddometh. < 24.00 UG L cis-1,3dichl mpmpmc < 54.00 UG L cyclohcx a 265.00 UG L 1✓ dibmmochlommedmne < 20.00 UG L di6mmomdIme < 32.00 UG_L dichlomdiRw,annd ce < 360A1 UG L r Foal (✓JR006 6.15 Raul6_ byCamplemdGT.mt PYe 12 of 39 r� i ' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r i ,«I .««: June 20, 2006 (714)962-2411 f"` LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER 7141962-0 56 p«.1..«4.. HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM t11�.e 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. r BD ee.elz7 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 nu,ea n VaneY.C4 92728-8127 ,sran W,a..: r ehe 4r«ae Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING vein Voe"..CA 92706-713113 Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 23, 2006 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 s«d«a r genWs Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 926065 collected by • the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/23/2006,your company was in violation of its crc1.. permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: ^"Bh81n Constituent(s) In Violation Brae ,. B`Cne. Oil&Grease Min. reemem wrlej FWIorboe Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may ,rn Boa- result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to ie Nema your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company r,e va•,.,, be classified as SNC, your companys name will be published in the newspaper as a significant violator. o-e„9e Plecenoe You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance ,men determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. rn. Sen. T S4n If have an questions, lease telephone Kell Christensen at 714 593-7420. vare Pen: Y'� Y 9 P P Y ( ) rcrh. Lmca ntty of Orange Kelly Christensen .ary Districts Source Control Supervisor Cosra Mesu M,tlway Cary r amr aiwi.t. c: OCSD Inspector - DF lane Pa�ch OCSD Engineer- MH r I I Y Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 q. (714)962-2411 Source Control Division r WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT T HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 06/06/2006 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 T ANAHEIM,CA 92806 LAB NO. 926065 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE : 2 Y Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date 05/23/2008 Time : 0700 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours 'r Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : q Diseharaa Permit Limit Over WMIt Violation Violation Conatituenta MQIL 11,sPD2 Mg Iba/Oav IVJL ms/Dev Percent over 1102 OG_1664_SGT 621.700 0.0 OA_B Grease Mlro 621,700.,. 200.00' ?W208: 210.s X °P Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. REVIEWED BY r r r r _I ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT August 1, 2006 (714)982 2411 r„ LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER r 1714)9B2Uc56 ..a vemml.„,n HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM ban..; 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. ao ee.8127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 unMn Valley C4 92728-8127 area.Wn„: s44 ails Avanee Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING �n vmiar.C4 92708-7018 Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 24, 2006 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 Zeal. Meni Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 926454 collected by _I • the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/24/2006,your company was in violation of its Col. permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: Aoenelm Constituent(s) In Violation area Buene Parr Total Toxic Organics r cypress F4u w. Valley Fuller. Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may � careen Ghee a,tnptan Beam result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to �I Henn. your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company L. Netra be classified as SNC, our company's name will be published in the newspaper as a La Panne YP Las as„. significant violator. �A'ewport Beect @sops Placenpa You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance _f al ern determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. seaSTa et iu9bn If you have any questions, please telephone Kelly Christensen at (714)593-7420. 011.Perk yenta L.da "'iJnq sf Oranae Kelly Christensen err Mel Source Control Supervisor Cush Mere I M,dway On, 6r.. Is...i... c: OCSD inspector - DF ��'''991 Irvne Rancn OCSO Engineer - MH �I rK ti A i I Orange County Sanitation District +� 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Caldomia 92728-8127 ,P (714)962-2411 Source Control Division r WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 07/31/2006 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1.079 a ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 926454 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE 2 as Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date 05/24/2006 Time : 0700 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours r Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base : 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : V. Dinhame Penult Lim tt Over Limit Violation Violation Conatltuenta osgL lesmav rnwl lbsMay MUIL ibIA30 Pmeent over Ire 626_SC 16288 0.0 P TOW Tbxl� 4.2BB-,1� OXA" 3.6W, organgs Please address any questions conceming this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. REVIEWED BY P y/ P r r re 7,1479 �' LIMSSC la d Report-Completed Gam man Gam Shcap 926454 Permit I-1-079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM LIMS 0 926454 Collo Me by David Fr®ds Rroaved m W 5242006 1:29:41PM d 1.8°C tsn Rel-, Dnc 60/06 ft,.bk Orpuk Compon.K G Method:EPA 624 Analysis Dae 052N2006 diddomdifluommnhmrc < 360.01) UG_L I,I,1,2-t techlmocdonc < 24.00 UG_L ethyl aruoro < 100.00 UG L I,l.l-tncldaraethenc < 22.00 UOL Ahylbensrt 229.00 UO L 1,1,71-tetrerLlomcdme < 22.00 UOL hetachlorobumdimc < 68.00 UG-J. 1,1,2-mchlomdhme < 24.00 UO L isnprapyl e.Y.a. < 200.00 UO_L r 1,1,2-tnchlomtri0uorodhane < IIB.00 IIGL isopmpyl ether < 200.00 UGL I,Idlddo"Oome < 46.00 UOL isbpmpylb.ne 211.00 UG L 1,Idicblomethene < mm UG_L mp-xyl. $53.00 UG L e l,IdiWompmpeae < 40.00 UGL methyl formarc < 200.00 UOL 1,2,3-mchlmbm>me < 40.00 UGL methyl tert-pentyl ether < 10.00 UOL 1,2,3-teichloMj,,opmc < 36.00 UGL methylene chloride < 104.00 UGL L2,44richlmobeorse < 52.00 UGL MTHE < 62.00 UG L 1,2,4-trimWylbmnaie 5,550.00 UO L namyl acdnte < 200.00 UO_L 1,2dibmmo-3chloroltmpme < 36.00 UOL nephWalene 216.00 UGL 1,2diblmoMem < 2240 UO L nbuyl¢cute < 200.00 UO L r 1,2dicblombemme < 40.00 UGL nbmylbeneene 295.00 UGL 1,2dichl.Menhane < 40.00 UQ L obepme < 100.00 UO L 1,2dichlompmpme < 22.00 UGL n-hc=c < 200.00 UG L 1,3,3wichlmbemmc a 20.00 UGL n-prntme < 400.00 031. 1.3,5- hylb. 2,100.00 UG L np lberuecac < 90.00 UG I,3dddm iabovrn WL e < 39.00 UG:L a-zylene 444.00 1,3diddompmpme < 22.00 UGL .1,mylbebzene 72.50 WL .� 1,44chlombemrne < 44.00 UO_L sryane < 190.00 DOLL 1- hlm 2-0uoeobe®e < 20.00 UO L ten-butyl almlml < 300.00 UO_L 2,24chlompropdne < 92.OD 130 L ten-butyl ethyl ether < 56.00 W_L 2-bumnone < 300.00 UGL tot-buty0smmne < 46.00 UO L 2--Moroethylvmyl ether < 30.00 UG L tcbechloroethme < 22.00 UGL 2-chloromlume < 44.00 U13 L mtmb➢drofman < 200.00 UGL 2-h.onc < 42.00 UO L MI. 3,2W.00 UG L 4 r chloromluene < 34.00 UO L trma-1,2-dichlomctene < 112.00 UG_L 4,soprmlml•.me 94.50 UGL treas-1}-0ichkoopropoe c 44.00 UO L Fmethyl-2-penlmene < 74.OD UO L bichbmethene 790.00 W L ecotone 1.090.00 UGL bichmro0unromethmc < 196.00 W L aaolein < 300.OD UGL vinyl acute < 158.00 UO_L aerylmmur0e < 136.00 UGL vinyl chloride < 66.00 W L bma:m < 22.00 UG_L bmmobernae < 28.00 UG_L bromochlommcth, e < 49.00 UG_L bromodichlaromethane < 12.00 UO_L bromoform < 28.00 UGL bmmom iar c cd < 110.00 UO__L carbon disulfide 104.00 UG_L carbon temarhloride < 66.00 UG_L chlaobaveae < 36.00 UO_L ehloroethcle < B&OO UO_L chloroform < 28.00 W_L dlommethme < 106.00 UO L cc,1,2dichloroelhme < 24.00 UGL cis-1,3dichlampmpene < 54.00 UO_L cyclohumc < 100.00 UG L r dibromochloramclhme < 20.00 UG L dibromomdlmne < 32.00 UG-L r fteMI 6/1/1006 6 15 Rmlb_byCompletedGS.r n page 15 of 39 r i i' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r r a�n<: June 19, 2006 (7141962-2411 raa' LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER r (714)9620 55 .ra,,.aaw..Am HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM m.nMa amp, 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. r PD. Bow 8127 ANAHEIM,'CA 92806 mnc.,n vane,.C 92728-8127 atrrec a4eneee: r M44 Baa Aga Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING 92 vanay.ca Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 9z7DsaD,e li P 9 Y 24, 2006 Re: Permit No: 2.1-079 .: Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 926453 collected by a the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/24/2006, your company was in violation of its permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: ^^a^am Constituent(s) In Violation Bree r Bue.PIrk" Oil&Grease Min. F w,n ✓aaey FWmTan Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may Gm Hen G ove ,r nwr9w"eaaU result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company La Naea be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a L.Palm" Lac air. significant violator. Newparr Beaty Q, wane You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance Bay determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. r 5wnwn "" V a Perk If you have any questions, please telephone Kelly Christensen at (714)593-7420. Yarbe Lntla ///��_ Kelly Christensen wry o(.viar. Source Control Supervisor L Sw Meaa M'w 0ry r rter 08es1ina c: OCSD Inspector- OF OCSD Engineer- MH r r - 1 — Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O.Box$127 Fountain Valley,Califomia 92728.8127 (714)982-2411 Source Control Division - WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : OSM612ODS 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2-1-079 ANAHEIM,CA 92808 LAB NO. 926453 INSPECTOR DF Attention: TARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE : 2 - Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date : 05/24/200S Time : 0700 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours p° Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective: glseherm Permit Lima Over Lime vlolatim Mellon Constisrents Big& Icy Big& IMAmv pall, IbelDav Percent DIM LM OG_1666_SGT 487.100 0.0 a Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593.7420. REVIEWED BY - - - rI i ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r rI� rP August 1, 2006 (7141862-2411 ru: LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER r (7141962ms6 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM te,mxy wu�.1 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. r PG eox8127 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 nmin van6y.cA 9272B.8127 eenrt nYrytr .J a44 EIr6 Areaae Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICT'S MONITORING main Valley.CA 92708-7018 Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: May 25, 2006 Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 any Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 926457 collected by • the Orange County Sanitation District on 05/25/2006, your company was in violation of its r mttee permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: Anaheim Constituents) In Violation Brea a..Pen' Toler Toxic Organics � Lypre66 F4unWn Vepey FNlarma Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may Garden Gno. r dngrcn Beech result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to I'M. your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant (SNC). Should your company Le Mehra La Pal. be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published in the newspaper as a Loa aeanmfi significant violator. r Newport Beech Ga Panama You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance Sama.ern determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. Sail 6wama mn If you have any questions, please telephone Kelly Christensen at(714)593-7420. Nile Park t 'aa Linea vnry el arenpe 1 Kelly Christensen @Lary Oletrictt Source Control Supervisor r Gnaw Mafia MiJwey oty eater a(fitritt6 u: OCSD inspector - OF 1 wne R4nah OCSD Engineer - MH rl rl rl � i l Orange County Sanitation District .d 108" Ellis Avenue P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728.8127 (714)962-2411 Source Control Division w WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT a HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 07/31/2006 1120 N.ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2.1.079 a ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 926457 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE 2 o✓ Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date 05/25/2006 Time : 0700 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours w Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base: 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : olopham. Pamit Limn Over Limit Violation Violation Conaetuants -CVL Ibomav OL Ina/Dav MPJL IbWDav PEECEEIS QX" Tv" 624_SC 15.104 0.0 TOW Toxic 2.915`.. O.SB.• 2.33 . 41 Ottymlg a Please address any questions concerning this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. REVIEWED BY V — I 4'^ T° T 2-1-079 d LRIISSC Ivterfeee Re "-CvmpleW G.Shab G.Sbeeee 926457 Permit 2-1-079 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM LIMS0 926457 Callectm by David Franca Roodadly Lob51252006 8:38:07AMet2.2T Lab ReleesNDem &M PoBesbk Orpubc Compoueft G Method:EPA 624 Analyse Dace 052512006 dichimoddho,ometheee < 360.00 UG-L 1.1,1,2-tetrechloco thane < 24.00 UGL ethyl accrete < 100.00 UG L 1.1.1-bichlameWme < 22.00 UGL ethymmtzece 139.00 UG L 1,1,2,2-tetmchloruedmne < 22.00 UGL hexachlombutadieoe < 69.00 UG L 1,1,2-bichlomethan < 24.OD UGL isopropyl aerate < 200M DO L12-niahlorotnflumoethme < 118.00 UG L isopropyl ether < 200.00 UG EL 1,1-dichlomedie„e < 46.00 UGL isopmpylbenrene 179.00 UG L 1,1-0ieldomethene < 134A0 UGL mpxyhe SOI.00 UG L I,Idichlomptopene < 40.00 UGL methyl femme < 20100 UG L L2.3-trichlmobenz®e < 40.00 UG L methyl tent-pentyl ether < 10.00 UG L 1,2,3-hichloropropme < 36.00 UGL muthyleoe chloride < 104A0 UG L 1,2,44riddombcmvx < 32.W UGL MIBE < 62.00 UG L L2,4-vimethylben=e 4,490.00 UGL .amyl acetate < 200.00 UG L 1,2-ciln o-3-chlompmp8ne < 36A0 UGL .phtheleoe 118.00 UGL 1,2-0ibmmcethme < 22.00 UG L n-butyl eawe < 200A0 UG L ae 1,2dichlambevaTe < 40.00 UGL n-butylbenrene 212.00 DILL 12dichlmomhene < 40p0 UGL n-heptme 389.00 UG L 12dichlmupmpme < 2LOO UG L n-hex®e < 200.00 UGL 12,5-trichlombeozene < 20.00 UGL n-pentane < 400A0 DO L ~ 12f-trurmdhylbm 1,690.00 UG L nl.Wlbeozene < 90g0 UGL 1,3d om iehlbeorme < 38.00 UGL o-"1. 291.00 UG_L 1,3dicldoropropme < 22.00 UG:L sec-butylbectone 71.50 UG L pi 1,4-0ich1ombevrme < 44.00 UGL styrtm < 190.00 UG L 1-cblom-2-fluombvtmte < 20.00 UGL tart-butyl alcohol < 800.00 UG L 22dichlompmpme < 92-W UG L ten-butyl ethyl edi f < 56.00 UG L 24ata.one < 300.00 UGL tart-butylbeomne < 4&W UG L 2-ohloroethylvinyl ether < 30.00 UGL knachlomethene < 2200 UG_L 2-chlorazI me < 44.00 UGL tetrehydmfmm < 200A0 UG_ rn L 2-hexanme < 42n0 UG_L mi. 2,430.00 UGL ye 4<ldorowlue < 34.00 UGL tr 12didJomethmre < 112.00 UG L 4-oopmpy0oluene 64A0 UGL b ],;-dlddompropene < 44.00 UG L 4-methyl-2pentanane < 74.00 UGL bichlomelhene 345A0 UG_L acetone 4,120.00 UGL trichlorefluommethacte < 19&W UG_L ecrolein < 300.00 UG L vinyl ecemte < 15100 UG 1 amylonivile < 136.00 UGL vinyl chloride < 66M UG L benzene < 22A0 UGL 4e bmmobenzrne < 28.W UG L bromochlommethanc < 48.00 UG L bmmodichloromethanc < 12.W UGL bramnfmm < 29.00 UG_L bmmomethme < 1IOAO UG L carbon disulfide 76.40 UGL carbon tetmchlonde < 66.00 UG__L chlambenzene < 36.00 UG L chlomethatm < 88.00 UGL chlamfmm < 2L00 UG_L Y chlommelhane < 106.W UG L 6s-1,2-0ichlmaeNene < 24.00 UG_L cis-1.3dichlompmpme < 54.00 UG L cyclohexme < law UG:L dibmmochlammethate < 20.00 UG L dibromomethaoe < 3200 UG-L P. M.w W2006 6:15 Resmb_byCompleuccUS rpt page 17 of 39 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT August 1, 2006 1714)9e2-2411 � LARRY BOOHER, PROD. MANAGER ,r1141962d356 HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM rw sve.mw 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. Po ea.a127 ANAHEIM, CA 92606 ft. mn ven.v,rn 9272a-912r .u....OM..: g1e alis Avenue Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION: DISTRICTS MONITORING SEun 92 Ve-7 cn Non-Compliance with Permit Discharge Limits: Jul 10, 2006 snoeaole P� 9 Y Re: Permit No: 2-1-079 at.em.. a..nu.. Based upon the enclosed Wastwater Analysis Report for Sample No. 936008 collected by • the Orange County Sanitation District on 07/10/2006, your company was in violation of its MI.. permitted industrial wastewater discharge limits for the following constituents: anen.m Constftuentls) In Violation er.. B..Perk Total Toxic Organics,Total Toxic Organ]" „+ Lypress Fwmla,n Valley Fullerron Your company must take immediate action to correct this problem. Failure to do so may Be� result in additional enforcement action against your company, including, but not limited to trnn. your company being classified as Significantly Noncompliant(SNC). Should your company Le Le Pelme He r be classified as SNC, your company's name will be published In the newspaper as a significant violator. ,Je'1va-r eee^n R M. You have fifteen days from the date of this letter to appeal the non-compliance s..One determination in accordance with Section 617 of the Wastewater Discharge Regulations. seal seam ,. s�nran T�^ If you have any questions, please telephone Kelly Christensen at (714)593-7420. V1Ile Perk YorOe LAM }I ,- Y�:KY 0 0N.a. Kelly Christensen .n m..ei.x. Source Control Supervisor Cosre Mese Mtlway Gry . oi.rria. c: OCSD Inspector - OF Irv,ne aancn OCSD Engineer - MH Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 (714)962.2411 Source Control Division WASTEWATER ANALYSIS REPORT HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM REPORT DATE : 07/31/2006 1120 N. ARMANDO ST. PERMIT NO 2.1.079 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LAB NO. 936008 INSPECTOR DF Attention: LARRY BOOHER SAMPLE TYPE 2 r Your wastewater discharge was sampled and the results are as follows: Sample Date 07/10/2DO6 Time : 0610 Location: SAMPLE BOX Composite Hours Actual Discharge Mass Emmission Rate Flow Base : 0.00000 MGD (Million Gallons/Day) Effective : olachame Penult Limit Over Llmlt Violation Violation Conetltuanta M9L bl emav ,T /g_ lbsma n L. Ibwp Percent Over TT 624_SC 4. B 0.0 Total Toxic f 092;;:-.` ' Ask„ :..U. 1 . 881f''g '`•" WpOalm, Please address any questions conceming this report to Kelly Christensen at 714-593-7420. REVIEWED BY _ I 1 2-1-079 LIMS CInterfere Repo"-Cempletad Gran%eeO .. Graae she"4 936008 Pamlt 2-1-079 HAWK INDU577UAL UNIFORM LIMS0 936008 C011ectW by David Francis Rc<ivedlnl.eb7/102006 1:29:33PMar0.2'C Labiteleaud Date 71111,406 Purpable OrpenR Compounds. OC/Ms Method:EPA 624 r Analysis Dme 07/132006 dibroraamelhme < 64.00 UG L 1,41,2-roaaehlomethene < 48.DO UO L dirhlarodi0uoromethene < 720.00 UGL 1,1,1-tricJtaraetharhe < 44.00 UGL ethyl m ove < 200.00 UG L 1,1,22-tebachlowedwnc < 44.00 UGL ahylbraame 65.00 UG L 1,1]-triebloroeth rn, < 48.00 UO L heaachlorobutadienc < 136.00 UG L 1,1,2-trithlorotri0uoroethme < 236.00 UGL isopropyl ammo, < 40D.00 UG_L I,Idichlwoelhme < 92.00 UO L impmpyl ether < 400.00 UG L r 41-0ichlomahenc < 268.00 UG_L impropylbevene < 160.00 UGL I.Idichloropropmc < 80.00 UO L m,pgIones 214.00 UO_L 1.2,3-t"chlorobervrne < 80.00 UGL methyl forma¢ < 400.00 UO L 1,2,3-Riehlomproparm < 72.00 UO L methyl mrt-pentyl ed. < 20.00 UG L vam 1,2,4-trichlomber < 104.00 UG L mMylme chloride < 209.00 UGL I,Z4-nimethylb.e 1,620.00 UGL MTBE < 124.00 UG L 1,2dibmnto-3-cMoropropmc < 72.OD UG_L 'amyl accrete < 400.00 UG L r 1.24bmmmdmn: < 44.00 UO L nephthalem < 188.00 UGL 1,2-0ichlorobwae < 80.0D UO L n-butyl acetate < 400.00 UO_L 1,2-0 an ichloroethe < 80.00 UO_L n-butylbenzenc 113.00 GGL I,2dichloropm rope < 44.00 UGL n-heplane < 200.00 UO L 'r 1,33-triehlotobemum < 40.00 UGL n.hexarm < 400.00 UO L 1.3,5-trimeWYlbervsne 702.00 UGL n-pentece < SOD.00 UO L 1.3-0ichloroberveae < 76.00 MIL n-pro"Ibcusne 493.00 UG L ,.� 1.3-0ishlompropme < 44.00 UO_L o-xylme < 180.00 UOL 1,4dlr3torufwhrmc < 88.00 UGL sec-butylbemme < 112.00 UO L 1-chloro-2-Ouorobevene < 40.00 I1G_L styrem < 390.00 UO L Z2dichloropropme < 184.00 UG_L ten-butyl almhol < 1,600.00 UG_L r 2-bumnom < 600.00 UOL ten-butyl ethyl ether < 112.00 UGL 2-cldo nuthylvinyl ether < 60.00 UO L tut-butylbeazrne < 92.00 UG_L 2-chlomwluem < 88.00 UQL wtmcNormlheoe < 44.00 UO L r 2-heamone < 84.00 UOL wbahydrohom < 400.00 U L O 4-chimiclume < 68.00 UGL wlmne 808.00 UO L 4-iic mpylwluem < 94.00 UGL tram-1,2-0ic3Jomethere < 224.00 UO L 4-methyl-2-pentinom < 148.00 UO L trens-1,3dichlompmpcne < 98.00 UO L r acetone < 1,640.00 UGL vichloroethme 219.00 UG_L acrolein < 600.00 UG_L unchloro0uoromethme < 392.00 UO_L amylonitrile < 272.OD UG_L vinyl avow < 316.00 UG_L s bernme < 44.0D UGL vinyl chloride < 132OD UG_L bromobemene < 56.00 UG_L bmmochlommethane < 96.00 UO_L r bmmodichloromethme < 24.00 UGL bromoform < 36.00 UG L bmmomctharm < 220.00 UGL carbon disulfide 156.00 UG_L carbon mtmNloride < 13200 UG_L chlorobetvene < 72.00 UG_L chlorotnhme < 176.DD UG_L chloroform < 56.00 UG L chlommelhene < 212.00 UO L 60=-0ichlmoethem < 48.00 Ua L 6s4.3dichlompropem < 108.00 UG_L cycloheaute < 200.00 UG_L Jibromochloromelhom < 40.00 UG L r RmRd 7/1912W6 6:15 Ilaulb_IyComplowdOB.hpt PW9 of 16 EXHIBIT E Hawk Industrial Uniform Enforcement Correspondence MHMX AditstOa Com9bn10912NFINA A ' a ORANGE COUNTY SANITATIOIv DISTRICT _ I _ I January 25, 2000 IaW..: Larry Booher, Production Manager [714)9622411 Hawk Industrial Uniform 1120 N. Armando St. alam,p address: Anaheim, CA 92806 PO 6or 9127 r°u...�,Valley CA _ I92726 8127 SUBJECT: Compliance Meeting ,,eras.; Re: Permit No. 2-"79 101114 Ells Avenue r rt:am Valley CA — ' 92708-7019 As a result of your major noncompliance with the permitted discharge limits for oil and grease (O&G),and total toxic organics (TTO)occurring in September, October, and November 1999, Hawk Industrial Uniform (Hawk)is directed to attend a compliance meeting at the Orange _ I County Sanitation District's (District)offices located at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley on M a° February 15,2000,at 10:00 am. • — ' The following is a summary of the violations: Bide. a.anelm Date Sample Type Constituent Concentration m ) Bra. 0 910 9/1 9 9 9 Grab O&G 254 seen°nark 09/09/1999 Grab TTO 1.50 Fbe.w�Mal., 10/06/1999 Grab TTO 2.82 F°Ilefwn 11/30/1999 Grab O&G 348 Gaven G w _ L°.un9w. Beech 11 r,.,ne At this meeting, please be prepared to present the reasons for these noncompliance lea Hahra problems and an adequate proposal for the comective actions and improvements that Hawk La Pelma P P P L.aemlwa will take to achieve long-term compliance with its permit limits. You will also be required to Newport Beach submit a time schedule for the implementation of the corrective actions. After reviewing the °°'B proposal.the District may require Hawk to complete the necessary improvements under me Placentia P P Y q P ry P _ same and terms and conditions of a Probation Order and/or an Enforcement Compliance Schedule Seel Beach Agreement. Swnwn rusen Villa Park If you have any questions, please telephone Jane Tran at(714)593-7441. r°rne roes nnnppp — �ia•n olssHn. /� Jane Tran Caaw Mesa project Specialist Maeway G[y 4s.1 p;.,rmk. AR:JT:hk / H:1avp.db1ts16590Vlader1091746.doc Irn.e Rh — Certified Mail Z 765 126 730 c:Amoid Chavez _I _I T..0...u. me 0..hbn unnFh non can Cn..mmm�m�M1.vnmM1 4nallanra rn lahoawamr Cmremc I a ORANGE COUNTY SANITATIL. DISTRICT _I February 17, 2000 (714)962 2411 Larry Booher, Production Manager ui.a.ddt..a: Hawk Industrial Uniform maPO. B.B127 1120 N. Armando St. r ntanVoltay,cn Anaheim, CA92806 92728-8127 G4481iA ue SUBJECT: Compliance Meeting Outcome oe44 ara d.; P 9 r9unt.m valley.CA Re: Permit No. 2-1-079 —I 92708J018 The Orange County Sanitation District (District)held a compliance meeting with _I Hawk Industrial Uniform (Hawk)on February 16, 2000, to discuss the necessary a�ias corrective measures to bring Hawk's effluent discharge into long-term compliance to with oil and grease, total toxic organics, and temperature discharge limits. _I c"iom At this meeting Hawk indicated that the source of pollutants comes from the materials ""°ere; being laundered from a new account, which has been found to contain unacceptable Buana Pan: levels of contaminants. To resolve the noncompliance problems. Hawk is C�°fG9 Founwm Valley discontinuing servicing the account and has given the customer 60-days notice. The — Fullerton servicing of the account will end April 1, 2000. The District will conduct follow-up cero°" G-°ye sampling during the month of April 2000 to verify the effectiveness of the corrective u d gwn Beach P 9 9 P rdY lrme, measure implemented. If future sampling results continue to show discharge _ La Habra violations, the District may require Hawk to install wastewater pretreatment La Palma Laa Alam;we equipment or implement other adequate waste management practices. _I New art Beach Orange Placenta It is hoped that implementation of the above-mentioned corrective measure will bring $on`8 An. Hawk's effluent compliance discharge into Nance so that no escalated enforcement action is —I Seal Beach 9 P Sw"tan necessary. Tuadn Vlla Perk rarba Linde If you have any questions, please contact Jane Tran at (714) 593-7441. Fltary Bistncts Ic°t`° Meaa Jane Tran M,drvay Crty Project Specialist _{u,cer oiacncta 1 o-",n° a.nch JT:AR:hk H:\wp.d talta1359MkadeAHA W K.d= —I c: AC —I T Protect the Publm Health and the Enrollment wrouah Excellence rn Wastewater Systems' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT `.A. January 21,2004 r„�pions: 7;z4?+, Larry Booker, Production Manager i% ; Hawk Industrial Uniform ss 1120 N.Armando Street Anaheim,CA 92806 ' a)21 SUBJECT: Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges tCA Re: Permit No.2-1-079 e1a� t�;!r a; This letter serves to bring Hawk Industrial Uniform (Hawk)'s attention to its continued cx ;7ois noncompliant discharges to the Orange County Sanitation District's(District)sewer facilities. This letter also serves to direct Hawk to take immediate corrective measures to ensure compliance with the total toxic organics (TTO)discharge requirements set forth in Permit No. A 2-1-079. In February 2000, Hawk attended a compliance meeting with the District to discuss Hawk's previous TTO noncompliance and to give Hawk an opportunity to present reasons for the - noncompliance and a proposal for corrective actions. At the meeting, Hawk indicated that the a!'Be source of the TTO was the materials received from a new account and that Hawk had given the customer a 60-day notice for service termination. csyresn U.yirermnerwn F Since that compliance meeting, Hawk has had 3 other major TTO violations as follows: era 6aecn Sample Type i.q Sam)} ' G c .;, glT. 0 � tllatl9rrsjr ptirn a2w, Da _OYa T .Palma . . a ... District Composite-2C 04/12I001.59 1.01 Major .epp�n District Grab-2 05/06/03 12.27 11.69 Major dsnge kenue District Grab-2 12123I03 15.74 15.16 Major t6'Me '_Beech THEREFORE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 615 OF THE DISTRICT'S WASTEWATER n "'grin DISCHARGE REGULATIONS(ORDINANCE NO.00SD-01), HAWK IS HEREBY X* ORDERED TO CEASE NONCOMPLIANT DISCHARGES TO THE DISTRICT'S SEWERAGE FACILITIES. nys You are reminded that pursuant to Section 615 of the District's Ordinance, administrative fines may be assessed up to $5,000.00 per violation or up to$10.00 per gallon for each eb discharge violation. In addition, pursuant to the authority of California Government Code, y _N Sections 54739-54740, any person who violates any provision of the District's Ordinance will -a4' be liable up to$25.000.00 per violation for each day that such violation occurs. YseNttp Based on the above violations,the District is increasing Hawk's TTO self-monitoring "R•^�n from semi-annual to quarterly, effective this quarter(January-March 2004),to provide Hawk an opportunity to demonstrate long-term compliance with the TTO discharge y: limit. The District will be revising Hawk's permit to include this new quarterly TTO self- monitoring requirement. The District will also be providing additional self-monitoring report forms for this new requirement. ti Larry Booher, Hawk Industrial Uniform Page 2 January 21, 2004 1 Furthermore, Hawk is required to attend a compliance meeting at the District, located at 10844 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley,on February 11,2004, at 2:00 pm. The purpose of ti this meeting is to review the TTO violations and to discuss the corective measures that Hawk will take to avoid further noncompliance. if yo have any questions, please contact Mile Kleinbergs (714) 593-7408. 1 A nana i Renescu (/ i Engineering Supervisor AR:MSK:on G kw duWaauie.ee�O� «mc.wmran 11 »"Indu5Ma1 un:r d. Certified Mail 7002 CHID OOD3, loC4rr 7704 c: Kelly Christensen Dave Francis ti ORANGE COUNTY SANITATIIJN DISTRICT March 23. 2004 rah, '24ri Larry Booher, Production Manager Hawk Industrial Uniform ss 1120 N. Armando Street ` Anaheim, CA 92806 SUBJECT: Compliance Meeting Summary and Requirements p�T Re: Permit No.2-1-079 r: re..: can On February 11, 2004, the Orange County Sanitation District (District)held a compliance re meeting with Hawk Industrial Uniform (Hawk)to discuss Hawk's total toxic organics(TTO) violations. The following summarizes the discussion that took place in the meeting: r 1. Source of TTO. Hawk was unable to identify the source of the TTO violation other ;;'•.� • than to indicate that it services shop towel accounts, nor was Hawk able to clarify or :G6u confirm its ability to profile the accounts to ascertain the possibility of TTOs being introduced in the wastewater because of these accounts. The former and current Nm District inspectors had mentioned seeing stacks of dirty shop towels onsile in the recent past. wrrov The District has evaluated Hawk's previous TTO compliance history and has found that in 1999, the facility.has had previous incidents of TTO violations. At that time, 9^fcn Hawk identified a new account for shop towels as being the source of the TTOs. At 4 -cw^. the compliance meeting held in February 2000 between Hawk and the District, Hawk ;�1.f'Hebr° committed to discontinue the account by April 2000 and slop servicing accounts with perms dirty shop towels. fl,a .. aa. �� n;:^e• As a result of the above findings and the discussion during the recent compliance P.rv. meeting, the District directs Hawk to take all necessary steps, including but not limited p.c to effective profiling of towel loads and putting m lace procedures to prevent and .` ae.cn P 9 P 9 P P sie = minimize the introduction of toxic organics in the wastestream. Hawk is required to T" , submit a report on the corrective actions it has implemented by April 12,2004. ,. Vq.Perk 2. Quarterly TTO Self-Monitoring. The District will require Hawk to increase the 1i{f dr.^o° frequency of TTO self-monitoring from semi-annual to quarterly upon renewal of Hawk's discharge permit in May 2004. This requirement shall be effective upon Jo,ry ol.rrl... issuance of the renewed permit. �Cae Mesa Mldw Drry 3. Bleach as Potential Source of TTOs. At the meeting, Hawk presented the I possibility of bleach as a potential source of chloroform, which is one of the Ir.r Districts compounds making up the TTO list for this permit. However, upon review of the analytical test results for the samples that showed TTO violations, chloroform was found either under the detection limit or at relatively lower levels than the other petroleum-based volatile organic compounds found in the samples. Therefore, the District does not believe that the bleach used onsite is the source of the TTO violations. 1 J f' r- •' Larry Booher, Hawk Industrial Uniform Page 2 March 23, 2004 • 4. Clarifier Cleaning. Hawk indicated that the clarifier is being cleaned on Wednesdays and Thursdays. The District understands that the cleanup consists of emptying the r clarifier contents into a vacuum truck for offsite disposal. The District requires Hawk to maintain copies of the disposal manifests onsite and to be prepared to submit them upon request by the District. Disposal of the clarifier contents from the cleanup into r the sewer is prohibited by the District. 5. TTO Sampling. Hawk is requesting to be informed when the District collects TTO samples so that Hawk could collect its own sample at the same time for the purpose r of comparing test results. As part of its procedures, the District informs the facility contact or representative of its presence and intent to sample. Please be advised that it is Hawk's responsibility to ensure that it is available to take its own sample at r the time the District is conducting the sampling. The District will not either delay or postpone performing the sampling to accommodate Hawk's own sampling. Also, in accordance with the provisions of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance), the District has the right to conduct unannounced inspections and r sampling without prior notification. In addition, please be advised that any TTO sample taken by Hawk, in parallel with the District's, is in no manner considered as being a duplicate sample, even if taken r at the same time and from the same point, and therefore will not be admissible as a duplicate or'split' sample (which implies the actual splitting of a single sample). In other words, Hawk's sample and sample results will be considered in addition to the r District sample and as an indicator of wastewater discharges, but not in place of,for determining Hawk's overall compliance at the time of sample collection. Please note that the sample results will not be accepted unless sampling and analysis is performed in accordance with Hawk's permit conditions. Also, Hawk is required to •' submit the sample as a voluntary self-monitoring event using the appropriate District form,which is assigned with a unique tracking number. r In conclusion, Hawk is required to take all necessary measures to ensure long-term compliance with the District's TTO discharge limit. Please be advised that if the violations continue,the District may escalate enforcement actions that may include permit suspension or the issuance of a Probation Order, Enforcement Schedule Compliance Agreement and/or r Administrative Complaint. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at(714)593-7408. r r Mi SZeiZgs, P.E. raE Engineer, Source Control Division r GVAR:MSK:on H WapNSWONp,renol2W lV ftenWeinixtMW93394.dx c: Kelly Christensen r Dave Francis r ZOO G"d OSJO-ol I1,I00E9 11`11�H MZZ:01 PO-62-PO PDA19368 e s �� 94- Towel S4 Uniform SerViceJSates 1120 North Armando Street-Anaheim, CA 92806-714-234-2814- FAX-630-4141 a� April 23.20b4 CC: tr Mile Klelnbefgs County Sanitation Districts of orange County P.O. Box 8127 File Original Fountain Valley, CA 9772"127 w Dear Mlle: Please be Informed that during the period of time that Hawk Incurred problems with it's 170's an investigative attempt was made to isolate the cause of the problem. P [wring this time several customers believed to be possible sources of the problem were terminated and subsequently our test Indicate that we believe to have Cured the problem. P Sincerely. T y Larry Booher Plant Manager T1 C. N3Cn c) C) 2 ll P � L Zr P P r� ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1 July 27,2004 r .r..: (7141 SM-2411 Rusty Hawkins,Vice President 1.c Hawk Industrial Uniform 17141 WZ0358 1120 N.Armando Street Anaheim, CA 92806 r v a�at�z7 SUBJECT: Order to Cease Noncompliant Discharges r i.V.W.rn Re: Permit No.2-1-079 92721/8127 .ev.e.ammc 101W en."'R'°'. The Orange County Sanitation District(District) recently sampled Hawk Industrial Uniform's 9270e-701e industrial wastewater discharge to determine whether Hawk has resolved the violations previously detected in the company's discharge. On May 27, 2004. Hawk's effluent again exceeded the District limits for TTO, and also for Oil 8 Grease. The following table M,m„' summarizes Hawk's ongoing violations of discharge limits: I •r emu Corretlolerlt Sample Type Sample Conc(Mgfi)on Concentration Nolation aanei,n Date ImgfO Over lmglq Type f ere. eaene vent TTO District Composite-2C 04/12/00 1.59 1.01 Ma'or TTO District Grab-2 05106/03 12.27 11.69 Ma'or F mmn whey Fu11r TTO District Grab-2 12123M3 15.74 15.16 Ma'or �bBn �Ye TTO District Grab-2 05127104 65.77 65.19 _ Me or Huntington Beech '� rrnne Oil&Grease District Grab-2 05127/04 318 118 Me or La Reds le Pelme r°s�W. PURSUANT TO SECTION 615 OF THE DISTRICT'S WASTEWATER DISCHARGE Orrea REGULATIONS(ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-01), HAWK IS HEREBY ORDERED TO CEASE Pl.renva NONCOMPLIANT DISCHARGES TO THE DISTRICT'S SEWERAGE FACILITIES. Sere Ana Swrl ,rr, During the previous compliance meetings held at the District in February 2000 and in r mn February 2004, the District was assured that Hawk could resolve its difficulties with meeting YOB Pe'* permit limits through better management of its accounts. It now appears that Hawk's efforts Yorde cndo have been ineffective, and that installation of pretreatment equipment is necessary. ' my a ar..re 1 Hawk is required to attend a compliance meeting at the District, located at 10844 Ellis a.rc..r oi.eHc.. Avenue in Fountain Valley,on August 3,2004, at 2:00 pm. The purpose of this meeting is �1 to review Hawk's TTO violations and to discuss the corrective measures that Hawk will take costa Mersa to avoid further noncompliance. MrdWeY Gn rlw.e.. m.rr+er. Hawk is reminded that pursuant to Section 615 of the District's Ordinance, administrative fines may be assessed up to$5,000.00 per violation or up to$10.00 per gallon for each 1�Re^cn discharge violation. In addition, pursuant to the authority of California Government Code, Sections 54739-54740, any person who violates any provision of the District's Ordinance will be liable up to$25,000.00 per violation for each day that such violation occurs. _I y Rusty Hawkins, Hawk Industrial Uniform Page 2 July 27, 2004 If you have any questions, please contact Martin Holl at(714) 593-7432. I Adriana Renescu, P.E. Engineering Supervisor y AR:MH:on HW p%%SW1rguye�VotIemVdI38T5B2dm °r Certified Mail 7002 0510 0002 6066 1170 �f c: Kelly Christensen Dave Francis �I rIf rr r4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT r September 21,2004 r I phmte: (714)962.2411 Rusty Hawkins,Vice President its: Hawk Industrial Uniform y 0141962M56 1120 N.Armando Street aea.aw.. Anaheim. CA 92806 ,aanms warm: ao. ew e1z7 SUBJECT: Compliance Meeting Summary and Requirements Poant.n valley.CA Re: Permit No. 2-1-079 92728-8127 Ra.ee M eaaa: 0944 Ellis Avenue antam'aaley.c4 On August 23,2004,the Orange County Sanitation District(District)held a compliance 92768-7618 meeting with Hawk Industrial Uniform(Hawk)to discuss Hawk's total toxic organics(TTO) r and oil and grease violations. The following summarizes the discussion that took place in the Mmltar meeting: Lpn n Constituents. The constituents found in the TTO violations are aromatic compounds t including benzene,ethylbenzene,toluene and xylene("BETX"),which are typically as, 01ties found in petroleum products. It appears that laundering shop towels which have been 4naha;,n used to wipe up gasoline, oil, or other petroleum products are the source of the TTO's Brea in the effluent. Buena Perk . Way 2. Source of TTO. After each of two previous compliance meetings held in February Fountain Y. P P 9 Fu4erton 2000 and in February 2004, Hawk proposed to eliminate the source of the TTO Cords" o'"w violations by terminating the accounts responsible for their introduction. The "�-ae'or' sampling result of May 27,20D4 65.77 m /I indicates that controlling TTO r lftna P B Y ( 9 ) B L.Notre concentrations by this method has not achieved long-term compliance. !a Palma Boa aentaa: 3. Profiling shop towels during collection. Hawk suggested that drivers may be able New°orro-apnea to selectively reject loads which contain shop towels soiled with petroleum products. v�ecanea This is a Best Management Practice(BMP)for reducing TTO loading, and may be Santa aria implemented as part of an overall TTO management strategy. However, this practice saa�,mn alone may be insufficient to ensure compliance. Tuarin Waa Pet* 4. Long-term compliance. Hawk is directed to select and pursue one of the following Wares Linda options to attain long-tens compliance: air of eraaye a. Discontinue laundering shop towels, thus eliminating the source of Fkery bbtNw noncompliance. If Hawk elects this option,the District would expect to find no r soiled shop towels being laundered at anytime. Caere Mesa ^'1iaw-Y car b. Continue to accept shop towels and install a pretreatment system to treat the r 4.eer oi.trtots constituents generated by the laundering of these towels. a„na Ba. h At the meeting, Hawk agreed that company management would be able to evaluate I options and select a course of action by October 1,2004. A written action plan to return the facility to compliance, including proposed dates for implementation, is required by this date. No pretreatment equipment is to be installed without prior review by the District. �I Rusty Hawkins, Hawk Industrial Uniform Page 2 f September 21,2004 p Hawk is also reminded to take all necessary steps to control the discharge of TTO's to the sewer system to prevent violations from occurring. Further noncompliance with discharge limits and/or failure to meet the requirements of this letter, may result in escalated enforcement action, including the issuance of an Administrative Complaint. Hawk is again reminded that pursuant to Section 615 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations(Ordinance), administrative fines may be assessed up to$5,000.00 per violation or up to$10.00 per gallon for each discharge violation. In addition, pursuant to the authority of California Government Code, Sections 54739-54740, any person who violates any provision of the Dishict's Ordinance will be liable up to$25,000.00 per violation for each day that such violation occurs. If u have any questions,please contact Martin Holl at(714)593-7432. Adrian Renescu, Engineering Supervisor, Source Control Division AR:MH:on M�GepI�E�81P,naN<�Ial06YetlersVa1N23888.Eac c: Kelly Christensen Dave Francis ETS a y ORANGE COUNTY SANITATILm DISTRICT r r f October 18, 2004 r ynen.: (714)962.2411 Rusty Hawkins, Vice President Hawk Industrial Uniform �71419621 56 1120 N. Armando Street 'mil eewe..W.mm Anaheim, CA 92806 °1np i°tlia0" SUBJECT: Late Notice—Compliance Meeting Summary and Requirements Pa ao 8127 _ �.wn valley,CA Re: Permit No.2-1-079 92728-8127 eeme M°ryu: alga avanae Hawk Industrial Uniform is reminded that the item checked below was due for submittal on r Irc ve 92 nay,cA October 1,2004, in response to the letter dated September 21,2004 and issued to Hawk 7G6]o1e Industrial Uniform by the Orange County Sanitation District. This date was proposed by Mr. Larry Booher and Mr. Ralph Hawkins during the compliance meeting held on August 23, r I s11 2004. elcl 1' • .. O Industrial Waste Survey _ Effluent Meter Calibration Report ales Baene Pert r, cip'.. O Production Data F"anvin Valley Proposed Plan of Action �ungr°n Beech r h w ( ) Other: Le Ne6re Le Peerle ` L"c Alwnlrm anar[Beech It is your responsibility to comply with the requirements of this letter. Failure to do so is in or""B" violation of your permit and will result in escalated enforcement action. Please call the San,a,a undersigned at(714)593.7432 if the item checked has already been submitted. Seal Beach swmm� Teatin Yle Perk YbrW LinEa Marlin Holl Associate Engineer III Source Control Division �ry aleerlees AR:MH C wMeae N'.WBp1UsMMWI1ClA5511Enlgcemenlwawk 1.d..WW Uni .fflw lndueV lUnibml F%2 .Ex I Mitl y oty Ieror alee:9en Via Facsimile r I ne f Mh r� rl _I in me.nrn.n nrnnitl.nlna IvalemAin in umarm.mra� end nornn remnrra rnananemnnr J VHAWK INDUSTRIAL 1 TOWEL & UNIFORM SERVICE JI 1120 N. ARMANDO STREET•ANAHEIM, CA 92806•(714)630-8111 • FAX(t71144)63D-4141 Wednesda ,October 27,2004Adrian Renescu County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1 J 10844 Ellis Ave. FI\e Ot\Q\n� P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Ca. 92728-8127 Dear Adrian: In Reference to meeting long term compliance,Hawk intends to investigate and seek out techknowledge that is ......III practical and efficient in pmtr Ping waste effluent. Them as well,are very significant issues with the selection and installation of such a system. They are: 1. Installation of ANY equipment will require a completely new electrical service to include ' permitting, plan check and Anaheim's schedule to complete such work. J 2.Complete review of the plan already submitted for Ideal Uniforin within the districts for it's effectiveness. J 3. Submittal of the application to the Municipal water districts,a request for incentive funding. y As each of these issues that are bullet pointed maintain there own ubedule outside of my control I cmmot specifically give you dates as to each of there completions I can however, tell you that plans for an electrical engineer to survey our facility and to create load calculations is underway. As well,we are currently doing waste evaluations with Norehem the company selected by Ideal Uniform in order to submit plans on a system. We at this time am evaluating size to effectively submit places. Lastly,we expect to have the application to the Municipal water districts within the nest ten days for review and funding allocations. Sincerely. w Rusty Hawkins President .a ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT _ f _ I May 27,2005 anon.: m141 gat-2g11 Rusty Hawkins,Vice President rss, Hawk Industrial Uniform _ 117141962d 56 1120 N.Armando Street w vataa•d...m Anaheim, CA 92806 rfl0. ens.ddr.s o SUBJECT: TTO Sampling and Compliance Status Review Pw 812] onmw vas.y,cq Re: Permit No.2-1-079 92728-812] wr.e eddia.: aunt Enia Avenue During the period April 15-22,2005, the Orange Count'Sanitation District(District) conducted ""`"'"vaije�08-7 C^ daily composite sampling for TTO at the Hawk Industrial Uniform Hawk facility In Anaheim. ez]oe-]o1 e Y P P 9 (Hawk) M All samples collected were found to be in compliance with District limits. .� .bmbar However, a review of Hawk Industrial Uniform's discharge data shows occasional but aa.""ss consistently recurring TTO and oil and grease violations. The constituents found In the TTO violations are aromatic compounds including benzene,ethylbenzene, toluene and xylene cols. ("BET)C). These compounds are typically found in petroleum products and indicate that shop Anaheim towels,which have been used to wipe up gasoline,oil,or other petroleum products, may be are. the source of the TTOs in Hawk's effluent. Hawk's discharge violations since 1999 are Buena Pork summarized in the table below: Lypr... Rocouin Valley F.Nertan Sample Concentration Concentration Violation ce.e.n Ga.. Constituent Sample Type costs, 6aach Date (mgll) Over(m170) Type r �un Irn"s TTO District Grab 01/26/99 88.32 87.74 Major La Hebre La Palma Oil&Grease District Composite 11/30/99 348 148 Major Los Alamiras rvawpart Beach TTO Dishict Composite 04/12/00 1.59 1.01 Ma or w 0.npe Placentia TTO District Grab 05/06/03 12.27 11.69 Major .ante one seal Beech TTO District Grab 12/23/03 15.74 15.16 Major Stantsown n TTO Dlstdct Grab 05/27/04 85.77 65.19 Me or u.i Villa Pan` Oil&Grease District Grab 05/27104 318 118 Ma or Y.rba Lance r Wn.r at Drsnce TTO Hawk composite 12/13/04 0.89 0.11 Minor Mary Districts As a result of the violations,Hawk attended three compliance meetings held at the District on Costa Mesa February 16, 2000, February 112004, and August 23.2004. Two"Order to Cease Miq'wey City Noncompliant Discharge"were issued on January 21, 2004 and July 27, 2004. Hawk's sitar Districts instructing has been limited to terminating accounts thought to be the source of the TTOs and _ instructing its drivers to reject unacceptable loads. As the violations recurred in spite of these Irvine Ranch measures, in a letter dated September 24,2004, the District required Hawk to install a pretreatment system and submit a schedule for the installation to the District. In a letter dated October 27. 2004, Hawk failed to commit to a date for completion of pretreatment system ® installation. As of this date, no further comespondence has been received and no pretreatment system has been installed. —I Rusty Hawkins, Hawk Industrial Uniform —� Page 2 May 27, 2005 I Please be advised that the District will continue to monitor Hawk's discharge and, if another violation occurs, the District will take enforcement action which will include the imposition of pretreatment system requirements through an Enforcement Compliance Schedule Agreement (ECSA). Pursuant to Section 615 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance), continued violation of the permit limits may result in the assessment of administrative civil penalties of up to$5,000 for each day in which the violation occurs or up to $10 per gallon for each discharge violation. In addition, pursuant to the authority of the —I California Government Code, Sections 54739-54740,any person who violates any provision of the District's Ordinance or any permit effluent limit shall be liable civilly for up to$25,000 per violation for each day that such violation occurs. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at(714) 593-7410. Makin Talebi _I�JiW Source Control Manager MT:AR:MH:on R: pfts�Wgurem\zoosxdanndMMN dM c: Kelly Christensen Dave Francis EXHIBIT F ® Hawk Industrial Uniform Photos of the bypass pump, piping, and the bypass discharge standpipe cG -. fi EXIT TO,�BYPASS PIPE S � � s'•t MACHINES Ut .O � .\' y•� � ems{ _ Hawk Industrial Uniform bypass collection sump, R •1. BYPASS LINE(FROM BYPASS INSIDE WALL COLLECTION SUMP) ' PENETRATION tf It ) Hawk Intlustrial Uniform indoor bypass plumbing from collection sump,3/16/2006 r r r � J r b ed Hawk Industrial Uniform bypass discharge pipe(indicated by arrow),at exterior wall penetration, 3/16/2006 'V 4+ a, t Hawk Industrial Uniform bypass line(indicated by arrow).3/16/2006 ti r C:. 1 Hawk Industrial Uniform bypass discharge pipe and standpipe, 00. - - - r ' - GvPu r 1 — Hawk Industrial Uniform bypass standpipe dye test: dye did not appear in sample box, but appeared in Armando Street manhole. 3/16/2006 - DYE FROM BYPASS STANDPIPE,AT MANHOLE ON ARMANDO STREET N' S r, Hawk Industrial Uniform, showing dye injected at bypass standpipe, 3/16/2006 w EXHIBIT G Hawk Industrial Uniform Order to Cease Violation of Industrial Wastewater Permit Conditions, March 23, 2006 NHaaM AGmini nNe Complaie1091206FINALF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATIuiI DISTRICT d� I March 23, 2006 "� Dhvne: (7141 s62-2411 Rusty Hawkins, President jree: Hawk Industrial Uniform (714)9524356 1120 N.Armando Street MNNLeLid.. Anaheim, CA 92806 Pc eo.9127 SUBJECT: Order to Cease Violation of Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit Conditions unwm vnmv,c Re: Permit No.2-1-079 9272a-a127 wort a4ane..: a44 ars A"aaaa During a routine permit renewal inspection on March 16, 2005, the District staff found that ,r nt.m vnA.c4 g P P 9270e-7016 wastewater from several washing machines discharge to a trench which terminates in a �I sump. In the sump, a pump controlled by a float switch transferred the wastewater to a pipe M.ma. which penetrated the north wall of the facility and discharged to a standpipe outside the wall. npen=in Dye tests performed by the District staff indicate that the standpipe discharges directly to a • downstream manhole, bypassing the designated representative sample point at the end of rI trice. the underground clarifier. Bypass of industrial wastewater constitutes a violation of Section 501.4(A)of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations(Ordinance No. OCSD-01) Anaheim which states, "Bypass of industrial wastewater to the sewerage system is prohibited." Brea �Ie"an - Furthermore, bypassing the designated sample point results in altering and misrepresenting Pountan ✓soar the results of bath the District's and Hawk's monitoring samples that are used to determine Fwl.rron compliance with the discharge limits. Part III.E of Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit states, men C. "Knowingly making an false statement on an report or other document required b this igmn aeachor 9 Y 9 Y Y P 9 Y o-dne permit or knowingly rendering any monitoring device or method inaccurate, is a crime and to claw. may result in the imposition of criminal sanctions and/or civil penalties." L.Pa mn I Ln vs nl.xyortrt Baecn THEREFORE, HAWK INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM IS HEREBY ORDERED TO CEASE a.� Orange FURTHER VIOLATION OF ITS PERMIT CONDITIONS AND THE DISTRICT'S Pracenua ORDINANCE. sad a Ana Seal Bnch sram= Hawk Industrial Uniform is directed to attend a meeting at the District's offices located at Tin 10844 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley,on April 3,2006 at 10 a.m., to address these Won Park issues. lwaa Linda Ant, or ar..s. Please be advised that pursuant to Section 604.A of the District's Ordinance, the District may suspend or revoke any permit when it has determined that a permittee has: a)falsified, �morr, 0I.W.t. tampered with, or knowingly rendered inaccurate any monitoring device or sample collection method; or b)violated any condition or limit of its discharge permit or any provision of the coax " ' District's Ordinance. PJso, pursuant to Section 615.D.7 of the District's Ordinance, nmaw.y cro administrative fines may be assessed up to$5,000.00 per violation or up to$10.00 per gallon .ten Districts for each day of discharge in violation of any waste discharge limit,permit condition, or Irnne Pnncn requirement issued by the District. In addition, pursuant to the authority of California Government Code, Sections 54739-54740,any person who violates any provision of the District's Ordinance shall be liable civilly up to a maximum of$25,000.00 for each day in which such violation occurs. a To mamwin worlESlass leadersh:D,n wasrewaNr aria water resource mannaement Rusty Hawkins, Hawk Industrial Uniform March 23. 2006 Page 2 If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned or Martin Holl at (714)593-7410 ' and (714)593-77432,�respeectiivvely. Mahin Talebi Source Control Manager AR:MH:on K: ph4�Vvuwnot30 sysftAInIr,3s3 zdw Certified Mail 7003 3110 0002 3654 8140 c: Dave Francis ETS