Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1989-07-19 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS, 19 2, 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF : ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING ON JULY 199 1989 _ ye JT Tlo*too°litan v�Is tt' r dae ► V y w 0 s'ace 195dq 9NGE COVE FOUNTAIN VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER r L 10200 SLATER AVENUE - HALL B FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 3 . � � a•�� 1 ROLL CALL An adjourned regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on July 19, 1989, at 7:30 p.m., at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater Avenue, Hall B, Fountain Valley. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Robert Hanson, Chairman Orma Crank x Dan Griset, Chairman pro tem Dan Young x Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula Kennedy Roger Stanton x Don R. Roth T DISTRICT NO. 2: x William D. Mahoney, Chairman Beth Graham Ron Isles, Chairman pro tem x Carrey Nelson Roland E. Bigonger x Henry W. Wedaa x A.B. "Buck" Catlin Chris Norby x Dan Griset Dan Young x James Neal George Scott a Arthur G. Newton Carol Downey x Bob Perry Norman Culver a Iry Pickler Fred Hunter a Wayne Silzel James T. Fasbender x Don E. Smith Fred Barrera Roger Stanton x Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polis, Chairman Orbrey Duke x Carrey Nelson, Chairman pro tem Wayne Wedin x Edward L. Allen Paul Verellen x Wes Bannister Peter Green x A.B. "Buck" Catlin Chris Norby x Norman Culver Bob Perry x Don R. Griffin Donna L. Chessen x Dan Griset Dan Young x John Kanel x William D. Mahoney Beth Graham x James Neal George Scott a Iry Pickler Fred Hunter x J.R. "Bob" Siefen Dewey Wiles Roger Stanton x Don R. Roth x Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom x Edna Wilson Victor Grgas DISTRICT NO. 5: x John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman Evelyn Hart x Donald A. Strauss, Chairman pro tem Evelyn Hart x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x James Wahner, Chairman James M. Ferryman x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tem Evelyn Hart x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chairman Fred Barrera x Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tem Ursula Kennedy x Dan Griset Dan Young x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton a Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran x Donald A. Strauss John C. Cox, Jr. x James.Wahner Harry Green DISTRICT NO. 11: x Tom Mays, Chairman Jim Silva ti x Grace Winchell , Chairman pro tem Wes Bannister Roger Stanton x Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman Roland E. Bigonger a Iry Pickler, Chairman pro tem Fred Hunter x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton x Don E. Smith Fred Barrera a Wayne Wedin Ron Isles DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller x Ursula Kennedy, Chairman pro tem Richard B. Edgar x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton a Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran x Don E. Smith Fred Barrera -2- 7/19/89 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Corinne Clawson, Charles Nichols, Jean Tappan OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Kris Lindstrom, Curtis Spencer, Gary Robbins, Dewey Wiles, Bill Fleming, Bill Butler, Margaret Johnson, Howard Johnson, Thomas Pratte, Thomas D. Lewis, Nancy Skinner, Patrick McNelly, Don Willet ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Final Program EIR on Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan Verbal report of environmental consultant The Joint Chairman recognized Mr. Curtis Spencer of Jones and StokesO Associates, Inc. , the independent environmental consultant that prepared the Environmental Impact Report on the Districts' Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. Mr. Spencer advised that the Final EIR was prepared in addendum form which meant that the final document was comprised of the Draft EIR together with the Final EIR. The consultant' s report included a slide presentation depicting the various elements covered by the EIR. Mr. Spencer stated that the Draft Program EIR was distributed for public review and comment from April 13, 1989 to May 30, 1989. The Draft document covered possible impacts associated with the proposed Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, including growth, construction, operations, public health and marine environmental issues, plus other potentially relevant impacts. A public hearing on the Draft EIR was held on May 17, 1989 at the Garden Grove Community Center. The consultant reviewed the organization of the Final EIR and pointed out that Chapter 1 is the introduction; Chapter 2 addresses changes and additions; Chapter 3 includes public comments and the Districts' response to those comments; and Chapter 4 contains the bibliography. Mr. Spencer elaborated on some of the changes and additions to the Draft EIR which are included in the Final EIR. He noted two minor changes in impact summary tables. He also commented that although the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines suggest that an "environmentally superior alternative" be identified, the consultants -3- 5, &A 7/19/89 could see no technical basis for saying one alternative is environmentally superior because differences between treatment scenarios involve trade-offs between land, air and water, and because they are not in a position to judge whether one is more important than the others. He further noted that said CEQA guidelines also suggest that a "preferred alternative" be identified. The Districts' staff has done this. They recommend eliminating Scenario No. 1 (33% secondary treatment) because it represents backsliding. Staff recommended Scenario No. 2 (50% secondary treatment, the current treatment level) based on their evaluation of the trade-offs. The Environmental Impact Report will support the Boards' selection of any one of the three scenarios (Scenario 3 is 100% secondary y treatment). Mr. Spencer reviewed air quality tables contained in the EIR reflecting recent results of staff studies of the air toxics emitted during the treatment process. He pointed out that the new tables show more significant air toxic emission differences between the various scenarios than had been indicated in the Draft EIR. The higher the degree of treatment, the more air toxics that are released. In other words, secondary treatment releases more air toxics than primary treatment. The Final EIR also provides cost updates, and Directors were provided with a revised page of the Final EIR which corrected an error in the debt service costs for Scenario No. 3. The consultant pointed out that a revised chart was included in the final document relative to the numerical relationship between coliform bacteria and viruses. Figure 7-10 revises the estimate of the risk of contracting disease from viruses in surf zones to one in six million. The consultant summarized the types of written responses received on the Draft EIR. A total of 94 written comments were received, including two from the Federal Government, six from State agencies, 11 from local and regional agencies, five from public interest groups, and 70 from individuals. In addition, 13 oral comments were heard at the public hearing on May 17th. Mr. Spencer advised that 55 letters from individuals expressed the view that the Districts should implement full secondary treatment for all flows. He noted that some of the letters erroneously referenced untreated or raw sewage and pointed out that all wastewater receives primary treatment or advanced primary treatment and 50% also receives secondary treatment. The consultant' s response to the public comment that the Districts should implement full secondary treatment, was that none of the scenarios would impair public health or beneficial ocean uses; and, that all factors, including public comments, would be considered by the Districts in reaching a decision. He also responded to other public comments relative to whether the marine impacts are adequately addressed in the EIR. Mr. Spencer advised that the marine impact analysis was based on comprehensive marine monitoring program results and, accordingly, the consultant' s conclusions remain as indicated in the Draft EIR. The following other comments on the EIR were reviewed by the consultant. He noted that all concerns and comments were addressed in the Final EIR. -4- "r 7/19/89 Growth and Effects of Growth - The consultant indicated that the EIR fully discusses growth and points out that the Sanitation Districts do not have land use responsibilities and identifies .,'.. those agencies that do have the land use O 9 responsibilities. The growth projections are consistent with regional planning agency ; fy estimates. �. I Air Quality Mr. Spencer noted that the EIR responds to technical �anar comments b SCAQMD relative to compliance with regulations,Y P 9 permit requirements and their Air Quality Management Plan, and states # that the Districts will comply with SCAQMD regulations, will obtain the necessary y permits and will maintain consistency with r other plans. sR4E Impacts on Local Agencies - The comments received centered on construction and operation of facilities, especially within `a the treatment plants. The findings in the PEIR provide for adoption of mitigation measures to resolve most of these impacts. Sludge Management - The consultant noted that the comments received dealt with the desirability of sludge reuse, landfill impacts and the limited landfill capacity. The Draft EIR addresses these I issues and the Final EIR responds more fully to future sludge , I management planning by the Sanitation Districts. Water Supply Limitations - In response to the comments suggesting that the water supply�; � pp y m ay not be available to produce the " projected wastewater flows, Mr. Spencer stated that the EIR �. assumes that the Metropolitan Water District will continue to 0 ; I obtain the water necessary for the area. However, if water supply problems do occur or if conservation efforts reduce future flows, the Master Plan allows the Districts to implement the treatment expansion program on a slower schedule. fMitigation Monitoring - Mr. Spencer noted that some agencies suggested that a mitigation monitoring plan be included in the EIR itself. However, the consultant indicated that such a (� plan is more appropriate in the findings to be adopted by the Boards. A� The consultant then outlined the actions to be considered by the Boards relative to the Final Program EIR, which included certification of the ; EIR, adoption of certain findings relating to environmental effects identified in the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan adoption of a mitigation monitoring program, adoption of a statement of overriding considerations that certain impacts aren' t fully sa ',E mitigated but that the project is more important, and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination documenting the Boards' actions. k Mr. Spencer concluded that the Boards would also be considering approval of the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, as well ' as selecting the level of treatment to be included in the Districts' P ! application to the Environmental Protection Agency and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board CRW CB for renewal of their NPDE Ian -5- ! s 7/19/89 ocean discharge permit, and actual filing of the permit application. He pointed out that this EIR was sufficient to cover implementation of most of the Master Plan projects. However, additional CEQA documentation would be required for the extension of the ocean outfall , and construction of the interplant pipeline and reclamation plants. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report and Summary dated July 12, 1989 re said Final EIR be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. 7 Receive and file written comments Moved, seconded and duly carried: received after public hearing That the written comments received after the public hearing on May 17; 1989 (included in the Final Program EIR) be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive, file and approve Final Moved, seconded and duly carried: Program EIR on Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan That the Final Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors do hereby certify that said Final EIR has been completed in compliance with the State and Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. Certifying Final Program EIR Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous ballot: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 89-101, certifying the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the County Sanitation Districts' Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan - 1989. A certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re terms and conditions of application for renewal of Districts' Five-Year NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit Verbal staff report The Districts' Director of Technical Services, Blake Anderson, addressed the Board. He indicated that two years ago the Districts embarked on a comprehensive study to determine the appropriate wastewater management program to meet the growing service needs of Orange County and the increasingly stringent environmental standards. During the Districts' review process, three alternative treatment levels were studied to determine their overall impact on air, land and water resources. -6- 7/19/89 t Mr. Anderson reviewed the following three alternative treatment levels considered: i 3 SCENARIO NO. 1 - California Ocean Plan r� N ° 30% Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Removal ° 75% Solids Removal k (One-third of flow would receive secondary treatment) SCENARIO NO. 2 - Existing Permit Conditions ° 60% Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Removal i 75% Solids Removal Ck1� I (One-half of flow would receive secondary treatment, same as existing concentration) � N SCENARIO NO. 3 - Full Secondary Treatment (by 2005) E 85/. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Removal ° 85% Solids Removal i (Entire flow would receive secondary treatment) s He noted that under all three scenarios the Districts would continue to s;a provide primary treatment or advanced primary treatment to the entire O flow. ' t 11 1 It waspointed ointed out that the results of the EIR indicate that all three 13 scenarios meet existing regulations, will not impair the beneficial uses of the marine waters off Orange County' s coast, and will not cause � Pui:�' significant impairment of the environment. � I Staff recommended that the Boards approve Scenario No. 2 which provides for continuation of the present level of treatment. This includes primary treatment and advanced primary treatment to all of the flow and secondary treatment to one-half of the flow. Mr. Anderson stated that „ fir this recommendation was based on a thorough evaluation of the a engineering, environmental and financial information contained in the "Action Plan" and on all of the public commentary received during the ,., Districts' public participation program. E He added that the staff' s recommendation also encompasses the entire ' j� comprehensive wastewater management plan and environmental protection ,,- ' program that is included in the Districts' "2020 VISION" report. Mr. Anderson noted that 112020 VISION" contained it elements which would ,', ensure continued protection of public health and the beneficial uses of the ocean, would provide for the wisest management of limited public and 4 natural resources, and would promote balanced environmental management. He then briefly reviewed each of the following elements of the "2020 ' VISION plan. O ' B, -7- 8 q' jaE� ii,I 9 i h� 7/19/89 Element 1 - Ocean Protection Mr. Anderson stated that the Districts' wastewater treatment program would continue to protect the marine environment and the beneficial uses of the ocean as well as public health. Element 2 - Balanced Environmental Protection It was pointed out that the Districts will maintain a wastewater management program that minimizes cross-media impacts. The Districts' existing level of treatment balances the impacts on the air, land, water and energy resources and protects their beneficial uses from impairment. He advised Directors that the Districts would continue their extensive environmental monitoring efforts to assure the effectiveness of their environmental protection programs. If the monitoring efforts ever begin to detect a problem, the Districts would change their programs accordingly. Element 3 - Wastewater Facilities Staff reiterated that all flow will receive primary or advanced primary treatment and 50% will receive secondary treatment. Collection, treatment and disposal facilities will be constructed, as necessary, to meet the increased demands of the service areas of the Districts. Mr. Anderson noted that flow projections are expected to increase to 400 mgd by the year 2020. He further pointed out that within the next five years, the Districts would be adding new secondary treatment capacity totaling an additional 49 mgd, which is a one-third increase in secondary capacity. With regard to the cost for the various treatment levels, he reported that Scenario 2 recommended by staff will cost $1.4 billion less than Scenario 3. Element 4 - Toxics Control The Director of Technical Services stated that the Districts will continue to aggressively enforce their source control program to minimize toxics, emphasizing waste minimization and safe materials substitution. The Districts are pledging to reduce future toxic mass discharge to less than today's mass discharge. Mr. Anderson pointed out on a graph which illustrated the Districts' existing effluent quality compared to the California State Water Resources Control Boards' Ocean Plan limits, that the Districts were far below the Ocean Plan limits for effluent heavy metals. He further noted that the Districts' source control program had been so effective in reducing heavy metals that even the incoming raw sewage (influent) meets the California Ocean Plan limits for effluent. -8- 7/19/89 I Element 5 - Sludge Reuse Staff reported that presently 50% of the Districts' sludge is beneficial) reused as a composted soil amendment or in direct Y P 1 � a agricultural reuse, and the goal is to increase that figure to a 100%. It was pointed out that a dependable sludge management a alternative is also necessary, and the Districts would seek to have at least one in-county land disposal alternative as a backup. Element 6 - Water Reclamation I;I The new Facilities Plan provides for construction and operation of up to three new satellite water reclamation plants. 'The Districts will continue to provide secondary treated wastewater for reclamation from their Fountain Valley treatment plant, and plan to develop new markets to maximize reuse of reclaimed water. , I' i _! Element 7 Water Conservation Mr. Anderson stated that the Districts' will actively foster and promote water conservation. This will include developing cooperative Ali programs with other public agencies to provide public education, { f community use of water saving devices, amending plumbing codes and {' ' I { other appropriate changes to help reduce water usage. lr Element 8 - Regulatory Compliance ' Staff reiterated that the Districts will continue to consistently comply with all federal and state laws, regulations, and guidelines O I designed to protect water quality, air quality, land quality, r' agricultural productivity, public health and the environment. He r i particularly emphasized the Districts' continued compliance with the _ . Federal Clean Water Act and California Ocean Plan. p It was pointed out that a 11301(h) waiver" is a provision in the Clean {' Water Act added by Congress in 1977. The Districts' existing waiver C and any future waiver is jointly issued by EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. Mr. Anderson noted that while a 301(h) waiver does relax the BOD and suspended solids standards of full secondary treatment, it maintains tough toxics standards and 1 requires protection of beneficial uses. He stressed that the I',1 i { ; Districts are achieving these standards today and would continue to do h so in the future. 1 Element 9 - Energy Conservation G Mr. Anderson pointed out that one of the advantages of continuing with the existing level of treatment is that it requires less energy than full secondary treatment. He added that the Districts will 41,, ! l continue to emphasize energy management programs in their wastewater AI{ `, treatment facilities and would strive to increase the use of digester %iklj „ gas for energy recovery and production. 1. C -9- ihll I I II 7/19/89 Element 10 - Research Existing research and demonstration programs in marine monitoring, air pollution control , sludge composting, water conservation, energy conservation, industrial pretreatment and waste minimization will be continued in the future. Staff indicated that the Districts will continue operational research to maximize operational efficiency. Element 11 - Public Education The Districts plan to continue their community outreach efforts which will include information on all of their ongoing programs. Development of a speaker' s bureau is also planned. Mr. Anderson briefly outlined some of the public education methods utilized during the past year and a half relative to the Districts' 30-year "Action Plan" and other District activities, including distribution of 10,000 fliers, brochures and announcements, direct contact with over 2,600 people, and conducting approximately 100 tours and presentations. He stressed the Districts' commitment to community involvement. Mr. Anderson reiterated that "2020 VISION" was a progressive approach with a global perspective toward complete environmental management with the community' s overall best interests in. mind. He noted that all of the issues would again be reviewed in 1995 as the ocean discharge permit is only issued for a five-year period. Careful environmental monitoring and assessment will provide safeguards against future adverse impacts on the ocean. The Director of Technical Services concluded that the elements of "2020 VISION" reinforce the Districts' long-standing commitment to sound, cost-effective environmental management based on supportable scientific data. Receive and file Final Staff Moved, seconded and duly carried: Recommendation on "2020 VISION" Action Plan That the Final Staff Recommendation on "2020 VISION" Action Plan for Wastewater Management and Environmental Protection, 1990-2020, dated July 19, 1989, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file communications Moved, seconded and duly carried: re suggested levels of treatment to be included in Districts' The the letter from the Chairmen of the application for renewal of NPDES Newport Beach Harbor Quality Citizens Permit Advisory Committee and Environmental Quality Affairs Committee, dated July 17, 1989, suggesting the Districts phase-in full secondary treatment; and the letter from the President of the National American Cetacean Society, dated July 17, 1989, requesting full secondary treatment for all flow, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Public Comment The Joint Chairman pointed out that this meeting was not for the purpose of a public hearing but four individuals had requested to speak and he wished to acknowledge them at this time. -10- 7/19/89 The Chair then recognized the following persons who addressed the Boards: ;;'!, 1 Y ! Margaret Johnson, 19742 Shorecliff Lane, Huntington Beach O Mrs. Johnson stated that she represented the American Cetacean Society and was also a member of Green Peace. She referred to an article in NEWSWEEK relative to environmental impacts on human life in the future and related that to the issue of full versus partial secondary : !''. j ' g treatment. She urged the Orange County Sanitation Districts to follow the examples of the Cities of Los Angeles and San Diego and go to full f € secondary treatment. She expressed concern that if the Districts ,',;''' waited five years to consider full secondary treatment, the financial ';i' j burden of constructing the necessary treatment facilities may be too ;;,' . great for the average taxpayer. Thomas D. Lewis, 2810 E. 57th Street, Long Beach ' Mr. Lewis stated that he was a marine biologist and that he represented the International Membership of the American Cetacean ' Society. He indicated that from his experience in testing marine °I mammals that have been beached on the Southern California coastline, very high levels of DDT and PCB's are shown in their blubber layers. He also noted that many fish that have been studied, particularly in the Santa Monica Bay region of Los Angeles County, have been found to contain extremely high levels of DDT and PCB also. He expressed '''' concern that Orange County would develop the same pollution problems as Los Angeles County. In his view, the current level of pollution is ; already impacting the marine environment. On behalf of the American Cetacean Society, he urged full secondary treatment. O Nancy Skinner, 1724 Highland Drive, Newport Beach I ,e,, Mrs. Skinner acknowledged the service that the Districts provide and complimented the management staff for their efforts and for providing ?' information to her. She suggested that perhaps a fourth scenario should have been considered providing for a level of treatment in between Scenario 2 and Scenario 3. Mrs. Skinner expressed her view that by removing more solids, this would reduce toxics and viruses in the effluent. She was particularly concerned relative to viruses which she believed could survive for days or weeks in the marine environment. Mrs. Skinner questioned whether staff had evaluated any other compromise levels of treatment. She noted that she realized that the Districts would still require a waiver if they chose any ?'" compromise treatment level other than full secondary, but felt her off suggestion would help alleviate some of the unknown impacts in the future. j'' Thomas Pratte (no address given) Mr. Pratt, representing the Surf Rider Foundation, commented that, in his view, public health could be adversely affected by the discharge of effluent into the surf zone even if it had received secondary treatment. He expressed concern that it would be too late to correct the situation if the Districts and others wait until a problem develops in the marine environment. He noted that the cost of treatment in Orange County was far less than in other parts of the nation. Because of the unknown long-term effects of viruses in the effluent on marine mammals, as well as humans, he indicated that in his opinion, the prudent decision would be to go to full secondary , , treatment as soon as possible. A, 7 q, IWO& { 1.� i 7/19/89 Discussion, consideration and adoption of Preferred Treatment Level Scenario re NPDES Permit Renewal Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion of the "2020 VISION" Action Plan for Wastewater Management, the Environmental Impact Report and the public commentary. Director Edgar stated that he had participated throughout the process and had critically and carefully reflected on the thorough engineering and scientific information, and expressed his view that Scenario No. 2 clearly provided for expansion of the Districts' secondary treatment process according to the needs of the community and ensures a level of treatment which has proven to effectively protect the public health and environment. It was moved by Director Edgar, and seconded, that Scenario 2 [advanced primary treatment to all wastewater flows plus secondary treatment to one-half of the wastewater flows, resulting in 75% removal of suspended solids and 60% removal of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)] be approved and adopted as the preferred level of treatment to be included in the application to the U.S. Environmenal Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) for renewal of the Districts' National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) ocean discharge permit for the five-year period beginning February 1990. It was pointed out by immediate-past Joint Chairman Smith that the Districts' strive for operational and maintenance excellence and he noted that their efforts had been recognized by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board who had nominated the Sanitation Districts for awards of excellence which are given annually by the Environmental Protection Agency. EPA concurred with the Regional Board' s recommendation and awarded Certificates of Excellence to the the Districts for the last two years. Director Strauss asked for comment in response to Mrs. Skinner' s remarks. Staff concurred that if the Districts were to maintain their existing mass discharge levels of BOD and suspended solids, they would need to continue to build increasingly larger increments of secondary treatment facilities and would, by 2050, achieve full secondary treatment. For the 30-year Action Plan the overall costs and environmental impacts would fall somewhere between Scenarios 2 and 3. The Director of Technical Services pointed out that there is a continuum of options between the ranges of the three scenarios. Staff and consultants discussed many of these options before selecting the three that have been analyzed and addressed in the EIR, each requiring a tremendous amount of engineering and environmental study. He added that with a level of treatment between Scenarios 2 and 3, the overall discharge of toxics would remain essentially the same because of the Districts' source control program, which is the primary reason for the current and expected ongoing success in reducing the level of toxics being discharged. In response to a question from Director Polis, staff reiterated that the Districts regulate the discharge of BOD from the ocean outfall through both industrial source control and the treatment process. Additional increments of secondary treatment facilities will be added over the next five years to keep up with the needs of the Districts' service area while maintaining the 50% secondary treatment level . -12- �p,b•''I s' a7/19/89 Director Cox asked staff to elaborate on the cost issues comparing current construction costs with future costs due to inflation. Staff advised that under any scenario additional facilities will be constructed a r f6 i only in incremental units to keep pace with service demands as flows increase. Although construction costs will escalate if the Districts Vill delay construction of additional secondary treatment facilities it was pointed out that the cost of operation and maintenance of these facilities if built now would be substantially more than the rate of e inflation if said facilities were constructed later. . ' Vice Joint Chairman Catlin commented on his close involvement in the EIR 3j process and in the complex and technical issue of selecting the , appropriate level of treatment. He noted that his decision to support Scenario No. 2 was based on three major considerations: i .;° Capital Costs - Mr. Catlin commented that although it may be � IliI ideally desirable to go to full secondary treatment, it would � greatly increase capital costs resulting in major increases in z , the fees paid by the citizens of Orange County. He further observed that the cost of full secondarytre atment eatm must be considered along with costs associated with some of the other infrastructures in Orange Count such as transportation, � ,5•I. , � � 9 Y� p air quality management, solid waste disposal and flood control , all of which will place additional financial burdens on the public in the future. Cross-media Impacts Impacts such as increased energy, increased air problems and increased solids residuals are associated with full secondary treatment, and, as pointed out in the EIR, would O ' actually result in a negative economic, as well as environmental , yIR, , impact. Full secondary treatment greatly increases the amount of residual solids to be disposed of requiring greater landfill capacity. Until sludge disposal dyl., g p problems can be resolved, he suggested that a middle-ground approach would be more practical . ' ! Scientific Justification for Continued Waiver - The Vice Joint ,t Chairman stated that in his view there is sufficient scientific data and expertise, in contrast with the generalized public commentary, to justify the continuation of the 301 h waiver and avoid the unnecessary capital expense associated with Y P P th full secondary treatment. M r. Catl in commented that the Dis tricts cts I have an excellent reputation and record, both nationally and internationally, of pursuing source control programs to protect public health and safety and the environment Y and will continue Id I to do so. Mr. Catlin added that he is personally acquainted with Roger Revelle of Scripps Institute of Oceanography and holds him in the highest regard, j1 and that he is persuaded by Mr. Revelle and other Scripps scientists' �;i�,.� ; }, statements that full secondary treatment for deep ocean dischargers is unnecessary. Vice Joint Chairman Catlin urged Directors to support 'j Scenario No. 2 based on all of the testimony and technical data presented and reviewed to date. §1' i -13- i E u 7/19/89 Director Winchell urged support of full secondary treatment (Scenario 3). She stated that although the Districts' program was excellent, she felt changes in marine organisms and the ecosystem are very slow to occur and not easily perceived. Director Winchell observed that in the past man has erred in their knowledge of the planet and expressed concern that any potential negative marine impacts be avoided. She also commented that she believed the Scripps scientists' remarks were more directed to other areas with different conditions and reiterated her concern that the Boards not take an action that might potentially result in cumulative, slow-moving impacts. Director Kennedy stated that when she began the study of this program, on her first reading, she supported full secondary treatment. However, she was now convinced that, for at least, and maybe only, the next five years, the Districts can go to Scenario 2 without damaging the environment. She stated her reasoning was based on the face value of opinions of the very prestigious Scripps oceanographers who evaluated full secondary treatment and found that it was not necessary nor warranted under circumstances that we in these Districts have. Mrs. Kennedy further observed that her decision was based on the Districts' commitment to sludge reuse; water conservation; and the commitment by the Districts that if there are unacceptable impacts, secondary treatment would be tightened. Director Kennedy also stated that consideration of the total environment, which was brought up by Mr. Catlin, was another consideration of hers. If the Districts go to full secondary treatment, our land environment is going to take an impact that is worse than our ocean is taking under Scenario No. 2. She added that she was also persuaded because this is a five-year permit and will be reviewed again every five years. Mrs. Kennedy also noted a problem that the Districts face and are not responsible for is the storm drains and their impact upon the ocean, and the fact that the Districts often take the rap for the storm drain problem. She stated she believed that the storm drains are a great deal of the problem pointed out by the public. Director Kennedy also observed that while the added economic cost of full secondary treatment was also persuasive, it would not have changed her vote for the treatment level if she felt it was right. With assurances that the present level of treatment will be maintained, Director Kennedy stated she supported Scenario No. 2. Director Plummer indicated her support for Scenario No. 3. She stated that although the EIR states that none of the scenarios are environmentally superior, this scenario was the environmentally superior alternative with regard to impacts on ocean resources. Director Plummer stated her opinion that the increase in the cost to the public for full secondary treatment would be nominal compared to the possible unknown, long-term effects on the ocean. -14- 1 1 , J a 1 „ ` 7/19/89 Director Mays stated that the treatment level question had been a very difficult decision for the Huntington Beach delegates Although the O economics of the program are significant regardless of the scenario, he did not believe that cost was the major issue. He stated that the major factors in their determination to support Scenario 3 were environmental . A substitute motion was then offered by Director Mays, and seconded, to support Scenario 3 (advanced primary treatment to all wastewater flows plus secondary treatment to all wastewater flows, resulting in 85% removal of suspended solids and 85% removal of BOD). Director Mays stated that with the expected build-out of the County, full secondary treatment would maintain the amount of solids currently j permitted to be discharged and reiterated his concern for ocean protection. Joint Chairman Hoesterey observed that a member of the public had expressed concern about DDT and PCB's P and asked staff whether the ! ' allowable emission of DDT and PCB would be different if the Districts' '! waiver were renewed. Staff advised that the actual limitations under which the Districts operate would be the same under Scenarios 2 or 3 for DDT and PCB. He further noted that because of the Districts' source control program and because both of those materials were banned from the general public's use since the early 1970' s, the Districts detect no PCB in their effluent today, nor do they expect any in the future. With regard to DDT, normally none is found in the effluent, although t {{ ' occasionally very low levels are measured. The Director of Technical Services stated that under any treatment scenario DDT and PCB are essentially a non-issue for the Orange County Sanitation Districts, based O 3 on an exhaustive study performed a few years ago. Joint Chairman Hoesterey then commented that he, along with the other Directors, had carefully studied the treatment level issue and looked at f � ', ; 'I'i all of the alternatives, weighing them against cross-media impacts. Mr. Hoesterey said that as others had stated, the economic factors had I ` probably been one of his least considerations until he considered where that money could best be used to help mitigate overall impacts on our environment. The Joint Chairman pointed out that if the Board decided that evening to '`" go to full secondary treatment (Scenario 3) that decision would be irreversible and the Districts would begin immediately to implement the plan over the next 15 years. However, if Directors chose. Scenario No. 2 based on all of the data provided by staff and consultants, and the Scripps Institute people, it would not be an irreversible decision. He further pointed out that should data or conditions change warranting an !; increase in the level of secondary treatment, that option is always available to the Districts at any time. The Joint Chairman commented on the Districts' reputation of being an ' environmentally sensitive agency that has no Y 9 Y t only performed to established limits, but at a level significantly better than what legal a, ; ! limits are, and stated that this agency will continue to do the best job possible in the future. Mr. Hoesterey stated that contrary to the -15- y �7 4"1 A,I 1 61 J 7/19/89 remarks of one of the members of the public that if the Districts sought continuation of the waiver, they would "be getting away with something" , that has not been the policy or direction of the Boards in the past, and he did not believe it would change in the future. He reiterated that the Districts are concerned with environmental impacts on all media--the ocean, the air and the land--and have implemented their own controls far exceeding any regulatory controls placed upon them. Joint Chairman Hoesterey then stated that he would support the original motion in favor of Scenario No. 2 as the prescribed level of treatment to be included in the Districts' application for renewal of their ocean discharge permit, and that he would oppose the substitute motion for Scenario No. 3. The Joint Chairman then called for a vote on the substitute motion in support of Scenario 3 (full secondary treatment) as the preferred treatment level alternative. Following a roll call vote, the Secretary reported that the substitute motion had failed by virtue of eight Districts voting to defeat the motion and one District voting for the motion. The Joint Chairman then called for a vote on the original motion that Scenario 2 (advanced primary treatment to all wastewater flows plus secondary treatment to one-half of the flows) be approved and adopted as the preferred level of treatment to be included in the application to the EPA and the CRWQCB for renewal of the Districts' NPDES ocean discharge permit for the five-year period beginning February 1990. Following a roll call vote, the Secretary reported that the original motion had passed by virtue of eight Districts voting in favor of the motion and one District voting against the motion. It was then FURTHER MOVED, seconded and duly carried that the Districts' staff and consultants be, and are hereby, directed to prepare and file an application with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, based on the Scenario No. 2 preferred treatment level approved and adopted by the Boards, for renewal of the Districts' National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit, in accordance with the provisions of Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan dated February 1989 Approving 1989 Master Plan Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilites Master Plan, dated February 1989, consisting of the following volumes, be, and is hereby, approved and adopted: -16- 7/19/89 , i y Volume Title Summary Re Vol ume 1 0 y Report p Volume 2, Parts 1-3 Joint Works Treatment and Disposal ,. Facilities { Volume 3 Potential Water Reclamation Plants !';', Reconnaissance Report Volume 4, Parts 1,2 Trunk Sewer Conveyance System ; Volume 5 Computer Control , Monitoring and Data Handling Systems '+' Volume 6 Reliability Analysis Volume 7, Parts 1-3 Disaster Preparedness Plan Volume 8 Financial Plan Directing staff to implement Moved, seconded and duly carried: elements of Facilities Master Plan to effect Scenario No. 2 That the staff be, and is hereby, treatment level adopted by Boards directed to implement appropriate , i elements of the adopted 1989 Facilities Master Plan to effect the treatment level proposed in Scenario No. 2 (advanced primary treatment to all wastewater flows and secondary treatment to one-half of the wastewater flows) to be included in the application to EPA and CRWQCB for renewal of the Districts' NPDES ocean discharge permit, as previously determined by the Boards of Directors. Directors Tom Mays and Grace Winchell requested that their votes in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by Making certain findings re roll call vote: '' !; environmental effects identified in r 1989 Facilities Master Plan and That the Boards of Directors do hereby adopting a statement of overriding adopt Resolution No. 89-102, making considerations based on treatment certain findings relating to level included in Scenario No. 2 significant environmental effects identified in the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan dated February 1989 ("The Project") based on the treatment level included in Scenario No. 2 (advanced primary treatment to all wastewater flows and secondary treatment to one-half of the wastewater flows) ; adopting a statement of overriding consideration; and 1i authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination re said project. A ,, certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -17- r ra II WE 7/19/89 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m. , July 19, 1989. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m. , July 19, 1989. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m. , July 19, 1989. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m. , July 19, 1989. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m. , July 19, 1989. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m. , July 19, 1989. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m. , July 19, 1989. (THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE CONTINUED FROM THE REGULAR MEETING HELD ON JULY 12, 1989 DUE TO LACK OF QUORUM IN DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 11) : DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 14, 1989, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -18- -311 5 3 Ep s t #a i t 7/19/89 DISTRICT it There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held June 14, 1989, the Chairman ordered 0 that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICTS 5 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, f and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 6/07/89 6/21/89 Ft ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 602,029.90 $1,047,099.77 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 3,214,330.61 842,081.28 Joint Working Capital Fund - 126,669.14 175,031.33 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 626.79 11,161.01 DISTRICT NO. 5 7,873.12 7,649.42 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 54.56 6,456.97 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 700,101.86 8,291.25 4,651,685.98 2,097,771.03 DISTRICTS 5 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing and directing execution and filing of documents necessary That the following resolutions ,., for Federal and State Grants for authorizing and directing execution and -'' the 1988-89 Joint Works Improve- filing of documents P g necessary for ►� ; . ments and Additions Federal and State Clean Water Grants and ijl ! Loans under 33 U.S.C. , 1251 et seq. ; Chapters 12.5, 13, 14 and 15; and Division 7 of the California Water Code, and providing certain assurances in connection with the 1989-90 Joint Works Improvements and Additions, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors: ►� f District No. Resolution No. 5 89-70-5 i a 11 89-73-11 �t Certified copies of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of ? these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: +' Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 1 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is Professional Services Agreement hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum with The Keith Companies for design No. 1 to the Professional Services and construction services re Agreement with The Keith Companies for tl f . Contracts Nos. 5-35 and 5-36 design and construction services required re South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35, and Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, to provide for changes in the scope of work initiated by The Irvine Company, City of Newport Beach and Laguna Beach County Water District re project alignment O in Pacific Coast Highway and the construction schedules for said projects (the ; . project costs are being paid by the proponents) . n -19- f� N 7/19/89 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim of Hamish Michael re Contract No. 5-31 That the claim of Hamish Michael dated May 31, 1989, in the amount of $248.19 for damage to his auto windshield from debris, allegedly in connection with construction of Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract No. 5-31, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the District' s ` General Counsel , liability claims administrator, contractor and contractor's insurance company for appropriate action. DISTRICTS 5 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Creating a Capital Facilities Fund and terminating the Accumulated That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Capital Outlay Fund and the the following resolutions, creating a Facilities Revolving Fund Capital Facilities Fund and terminating the Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund and the Facilities Revolving Fund in each District: DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 5 89-84-5 11 89-87-11 Certified copies of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1989-90 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District' s 1989-90 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 6,766,000 Capital Facilities Fund 8,249,000 Bond & Interest Fund - 1951 52,000 TOTAL $ 15,067,000 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and unanimously Approving 1989-90 fiscal year carried by roll call vote: budget That the District' s 1989-90 fiscal year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the following amounts: Operating Fund $ 7,302,000 Capital Facilities Fund 10,652,000 Bond & Interest Fund - 1951 14,000 Bond & Interest Fund - 1958 29,000 TOTAL $ 17,997,000 -20- I" a anti,ra 4 7/19/89 DISTRICTS 5 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing the annual Gann appropriations limit for fiscal That the following resolutions establishiro 4YlG year 1989-90 the annual Gann appropriations limit for s � x fiscal year 1989-90 for each District in accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California aYl, Government Code, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of Directors: DISTRICT RESO. NO. LIMITATION r 5 89-93-5 $ 2,077,000 11 89-96-11 2,209,000 Certified copies of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 5 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve Staff Report re revised Wastewater That the Staff Report, dated June 28, f Discharge Regulations for the 1989 (Revised) , summarizing revisions to County Sanitation Districts of the Districts' wastewater discharge ' Orange County regulations, be, and is hereby, sF; , 1, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICT 5 Ar , Actions re proposed Ordinance .,Lq ray,' , No. 520 ' First reading of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: ITT! Ordinance No. 520 That proposed Ordinance No. 520, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 514 and 518, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. ' Following the reading of Ordinance No. 520 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 520, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge 9 9 a is har Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, � . and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 514 and 518, be introduced and passed to P 9 second reading and public hearing on August 9, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District' s administrative office. Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 520 is categorically exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby r finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 520 is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act Tj (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15308, in that the Ordinance is a regulatory , I. action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment. j� 7)S -21- 7/19/89 DISTRICT 11 • Actions re proposed Ordinance No. 1110 First reading of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 1110 That proposed Ordinance No. 1110, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1106 and 1107, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1110 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1110, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. it of Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1106 and 1107 be introduced and passed to second reading and public hearing on August 9, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , at the District's administrative office. Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordinance No. 1110 is categorically • exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1110 is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15308, in that the Ordinance is a regulatory action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment. DISTRICTS 5 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Staff Report re Agreement with County Assessor re That the Staff Report re Agreement with Supplemental User Fee Processing County Assessor re Supplemental User Fee Processing, dated June 29, 1989, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 5 & it Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement with the That the General Manager be, and is Orange County Assessor' s Office for hereby, authorized to execute an the purchase/lease of property file agreement with the Orange County data base services required to Assessor' s Office for the purchase/lease collect supplemental user fees on of property file data base services the property tax bills necessary to calculate, assess and collect the Districts' supplemental user fee charges on the annual property tax bills, the annual cost for said services to be in the amount fixed by the County Assessor and Board of Supervisors. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (END OF ITEMS CONTINUED FROM JULY 12, 1989 JOINT BOARD MEETING) -22- 7/19/89 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment t That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:20 p.m. , July 19, 1989. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:20 p.m. , July 19, 1989. I Secretary of t e Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 f 6 -23- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/31/89 FAGE 1 L REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/07/89 POSTING DATE 06/07/89 3 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ° 099988 ABC PAINT STRIPING SERVICE $675.00 ASPHALT STRIPING ° 099989 ADAMSON UNIFORM 6 EQUIP. $582.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES 71 099990 A VA CO CONSTAUCTORS9 INC. $192509764.21 CONSTRUCTION PI-26,P2-32,33.34 ° 099°91 AIR PRODUCTS 9 CHEMICAL INC. $139069.60 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 099992 AIRGUARD INDUSTRIES• INC. $109.33 ELECTRIC PARTS 099993 ALLEN GMC TRUCKS $14t085.28 NEW VEHICLE 11 099994 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. S19181.55 MECHANICAL PARTS 12 099995 ANIXTER - WIRE 6 CABLE L124.24 INSTRUMENT PART a0999V6 ANTELOPE A EQUIP, S11958.08 TRUCK PARTS 1+ 099997 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $29072.78 NOTICES 6 ADS 1, 099998 ARATEX SERVICES• INC. S121.90 UNIFORM RENTALS I� 099999 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PROD.• INC S85.86 BUILDING MATERIALS 17 100030 ASSOC. PUBLIC SAFETY $125.00 INSTRUMENT SERVICE i° 100001 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING $19404.50 SOIL TESTING 1GI __1000H THE AVEBURY OUP S141.T8 CONVEYOR PARTS =1 100003 AVIS CAR LEASING S18 062.00 NEW VEHICLES 100004 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S469869.39 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88 22 100005 PoW. T ND ASSOC. S59700.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-25626,P232,33,34,37 I23 209306 BANTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $39312.37 LAB SUPPLIES 2+ rn 100307 BENZ ENGINEERING• INC. S316.73 COMPRESSOR PARTS i 251 z 100008 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS S715.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES I ae! 11 100009 BON-A-RUES $86.20 TRUCK PARTS tDj 100010 BROOKS PRODUCTS $89130.00 VAULTS =tl ' 100011 R WN 6 CALDY LL CONSULTING $799892.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-37,J-23-1 2. 100012 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $205.70 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 30 100013 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES• INC. S440.00 LAND SURVEYING 31' 1 100014 GARY G. STREED $575.52 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT J21 J_ 103015 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY S172.78 PAPER 33 100016 C E R RECONDITIONING CO. $350.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 100017 CS COMPANY $89702.51 VALVE [:3:l 100018 CSI-CALTROL $19372.08 MECHANICAL PARTS 100019 CAL-CHEM SALES S148.40 SAFETY SUPPLIES 100020 JOHN R. CALAPRICE# PHD $49590.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - OCEAN MONITORING 3e 100021 CAROLLO-BOYLE9A JOINT VENTURE S299864.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 87-131 30 100022 CASE POWER 8 EQUIPMENT $593.11 TRUCK PARTS .0 200023 CENTURY SAFETY INST. 8 SUPP. S2 029.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES .1 100024 CHEMWEST INDUSTRIES. INC. S66°307.03 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-09-88 42 100025 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. $39143.39 OIL 6 GREASE d3 200026 CHLORINATORS d CONTROLS9 INC. $774.18 CHLORINATION PARTS •a 100027 DALE CHRISTIAN STRUC. ENGR. S19200.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-20 45 100028 CHRISTEVE CORP. S166.086.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-31 401 100029 CORINNE CLAWSON $32.02 MEETING EXPENSE i.:I7 100130 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $49945.50 MECHANICAL PARTS atl 100031 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV. $174.12 TRUCK PARTS +0 00032 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $69194.45 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES °0 100033 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $222583.65 BLUEPRINTING I°1 ez °3 °4 SS IJ e �7 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/31/89 PAGE 2 [_ REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/07/89 POSTING DATE 06/07/89 2 3 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION • ° 100034 CONTROL CABLESS INC. $57.46 CABLE ° 100035 CONTROL DATA CORPORATION $37 .50 FIELD SERVICES 7 100036 CONTROLCO S97.40t ELECTRIC PARTS i ° 100037 CORE-INTERNATIONAL 414222.00 COMPUTER PARTS ° 10003a COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $69,34 AUTOMOBILE PARTS 10 200039 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $29097.09 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES - " 100040 CAL WATER S129.50 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 12 100041 LARRY CURTI TRUCK 6 EQUIPMENT $229420,00 SLUDGE REMOVAL - - i _ 13 100042 STATE OF CALIFORNIA S480.00 SBE PROCESSING FEE 14 100043 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $154.50 HAZARDOUS WASTE TAX I 10 100044 DATA RENTAL AND SALES $33,97 OFFICE I 16 100045 DECO S371o41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 17 100046 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO. S12741.04 VALVE PARTS 10 100047 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $29119,79 PRINTING 19 100048 DORADO ENTERPRISESS INC. $259803.52 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 20 100049 D°VALS SALES CO. S129o79 FITTINGS 21 100050 E.I.L. INSTRUMENTSS INC. $37 .88 ELECTRONICS 22 100051 EASTMANO INC. $19658.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES 23 100052 W. H. EBERT CORP. S7834037.44 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-2 2• 190053 WoHo EBERT CORP. $3439435.50 CONSTRUCTION 5-29 j 29 x 100054 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY $800030 PRESENTATION AIDS 2.= 100055 ENCHANTERS INCo S44200.00 OCEAN SAMPLING M.0.6-10-87 i 37 -' 100056 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $260.00LAB SERVICES i 28 100057 FST SAND AND GRAVELS INC. 8234.83 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 20� 100058 JAMES FALCONER $22100.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - SCAQMD 1 70 100099 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. S32500oDO CONSTRUCTION _ 31 D 100060 FARR SALES 8 SERVICE 8758o79 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 32 100061 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 4155o75 AIR FREIGHT 33 N 100062 FERRELLGAS $29.25 PROPANE 34 100063 FISCHER & PORTER CO. S104022o77 CHLORINATION PARTS 35 100064 FLO-SYSTEMS S608.84 ELECTRIC PARTS 34 100065 GELBER PUMPS9 INC. W4.46 PUMP PARTS 371 100066 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT S511o35 PAINT SUPPLIES _ 3a 100067 FOUNTAIN VALLEY READY MIN $19613.65 CONCRETE 30 100068 DONALD L. FOX 8 ASSOCIATES 8 SAFETY CONSULTING 40 100069 THE FOXBORO CO. $29214.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 41 100070 FROST ENGINEERING SERVICES CO. 8132.18 VAVLES 42 100071 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $296.50 BUILDING MATERIALS .3 100072 GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION 91082160.38 CONSTRUCTION J-15A •+ 100073 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $19764.54 TELEPHONE ash 100074 GIERLICH-MITCHELLS INC. $14 353.96 PUMP & MECHANICAL PARTS 46 100075 DON GREEK 6 ASSOCIATES $139910.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 88-72 +7 100076 HALPRIN SUPPLY CO. S206.70 OXYGEN SUPPLIES 48 100077 HARBOUR ENGINEERING S34310.73 PUMP PARTS 40 100078 HATCH & KIRKS INC. $49735.31 MECHANICAL PARTS s0i 100079 So A. HEALY CO. $909000.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-31-1 .2 93 S. S] EI r -- - r-�..-r -a I - - - - ._ 1���^ r �� ��1 art�- �_�• i ff�niGiAi�T'ri . r _ FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/31/89 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ' CLAIMS PAID 06/07/89 POSTING DATE 06/07/89 z WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 100080 DAVID HEINZ E46.00 MEETING EXPENSE 4 100081 E.G. HELLER4S SONS INC. E97.30 TOOLS ] 100082 H I C-T-1,75-C. E18.13 HARDWARE I4 100083 HOERBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. 4 INC. E1r256.48 MECHANICAL PARTS �1 100084 HORIZON HIGH-REACH S187.86 TRUCK PARTS _ 8 HOUSE OF BATTERIES E288.69 BATTERIES 11011 1010086 R.S. HUGHES CO.4 INC. $29478.24 HARDWARE 12 109087 IMO DELAVAL INC. E366.81 ELECTRIC CONTROLS 13 100085 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS E19116.74 GEARS 6 CHAIN 14 100089 INGRAM PAPER E29104.29 PAPER 100090 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO._ E217.76 TRUCK PARTS I14 100091 INTERNATIONAL TIME RECORDER $89.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 17 100092 JACK M CHANGE $211.47 TRUCK REPAIRS Irle 100093 RIVIERA FINANCE $19149.90 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES li 100094 JENSEN TOOLS 6 ALLOYS $19346.20 TOOLS 'o 100095 KAMAN BEARINGS 9 SUPPLY E471.30 FITTINGS 2,1 100096 KANER COMPANY E14670.68 TOOLS u 100097 KAY-RAYS INC. E19407.27 ELECTRONIC PARTS 23 100098 THE KEITH COMPANIES $29765.18 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35536 12.1 m 100099 KIEWIT PACIFIC CO. E141069004.05 CONSTRUCTION 1231 100100 KING BEARING• INC. $29379.63 MECHANCIAL PARTS ` !01= 1OC101 KIRST PUMP 6 MACHINE WORKS $19281.01 PUMP PARTS 1 1"H l]�r y 100102 MARTIN KORDICK9 SR E3v055.80 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-31.5-29.5-34-1 _ e 100103 LEE 9 RO CONSULTING ENGR. E87s031.00 CONSULTING SERVICES P1-33 I24I--A�-, 100104 LIMITORQUE CORP. E59397.35 INSTRUMENT 30 100105 MDS E50.88 INSTRUMENT I3 100106 MPS E276.50 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES I321 W 100107 MALCOLM PIRNIE s INC. $189799.41 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 86-146 >; 100108 MARVAC ELECTRONICS E46.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES f34 100109 MATT - CHLOR4 INC. E19296.09 CHLORINATION PARTS Y' 30 100110 MCKENNA ENGR. B EQUIP. E169901.13 PUMP PARTS 36 100111 MC KINNEY ELECTRONICS E69.95 GATE PARTS �] 00112 M D-T X SSOCIATES• INC. E90.00 LAB SERVICES 34 100113 MEDLIN CONROLS CO. E291.44 GAUGE 130 100114 THOMAS MENDEZ $626.79 LIABILITY CLAIM .0 100115 MICR OAG COMPUTER $61419.16 COMPUTER SOFTWARE S HARDWARE �41 100116 MIDLAND MFG. CORP. $29889.09 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 42 100117 MLADEN 6UNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO E350 006.36 CONSTRUCTION 143 100118 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES E19420.00 LAB SERVICES - 100119 MOORE 9 TABER E59383.83 ENGINEERING SERVICES DIST 2 'IS 100120 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $160.31 FTTTTNGS 44 100121 NEWPORT BUSINESS INTERIORS E1*015.88 PANELING ' 47 1OC122 NORTH SUPPLY E778.93 INSTRUMENT PART I49 100123 OCEAN SALT CO.. INC. $333.26 SALT I49 100124 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. E369455.75 CHLORINE M.0.10-12-88 '30. 100129 ONE DAY PAINT 8 BODY S230.16 TRUCK REPAIR 31 32 33 3. `.3 36 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/31/89 PAGE 4 [_, REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY _ CLAIMS PAID 06/07/89 POSTING DATE 06/07/89 12 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 3 100126 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY $275.07 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES . 190127 ORANGE COAST JEEP $12,588.20 -NEW VEHICLE 7 100128 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $102.29 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 0 100129 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO. 173.03 PESTICIDE O 100130 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. 2 e4 1O 100131 COUNTY OF ORANGE $339754.48 DISPOSAL GATE FEES 11 100132 COUNTY OF ORANGE $22479.25 PERMIT FEES 12 100133 ROBERT L. CITRON $233.33 DEFERRED COMP DEPOSIT FWAR 13 100134 PACIFIC ELECTRIC9 INC. $151531.49 CONSTRUCTION 3-15 I 100135 PACIFIC ELECTRIC $589139.80 CONSTRUCTION J-15 15 100136 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $ 9 3 1. 100137 PACIFIC BELL S42.54 TELEPHONE 17 100138 PHOTO 0 SOUND CO. S89386.53 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 6 SUPPLIES 18 100139 PICKWICK PAPER $238.00 PAPPR 10 100140 PIMA GRO SYS7EMS9 INC. $449464.55 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 • 20 100141 POLYPURE9 INC. $1399371,66 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-8-89 2, 100142 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. S83.12 22 111143 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE S132.00 ICE 23 100144 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. $42400.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.8-10-88 24 M 1OC145 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. $29308.68 PUMP RF.P&TRq 25 100146 QUEST INTL. MONITOR SERVICE S735.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIR 28 = 100147 RATTRAY AND ASSOCIATES9 INC. SB9650.00 MAPPING SERVICES 27 ~' 100148 RED WING SHOES S123.77 SAFETY SNOES 2a H 100149 R.A. REED ELECTRIC $19533.90 ELECTRIC METER 29 -1 100150 THE REGISTER $12986.90 NOTICES 6 ADS 30 100151 REMEDY TEMP S263.0 TEMPORARY SFRVTCE9 31 100152 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. $66.62 HARDWARE 3? 100153 RICOH CORPORATION S69e37 COPIER LEASES 33, 100154 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO. $19140.98 LAR SUPPT.TFS 34 10C155 ROCCOOS TRUCK WRECKING $127.20 TRUCK PARTS 30 100156 ROSEMONT ANALYTICAL $512.65 ELECTRIC PARTS 30 100157 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC $762.30 7 100158 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S19300.84 ELECTRIC PARTS 3. 100159 RYAN-HERCO S562.35 FREIGHT 30 100160 JOSEPH To RYERSON 8 SONo INC. S7 4.2 a0 100161 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. $199.20 PARTS CLEANER .1 100162 SANCON ENGINEERING 9 INC. $69400.00 SANDBLASTING .2 IOC163 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $128.00 43 100164 SCHAEFER DIXON ASSOCIATES $69730.62 ENGINEERING SERVICES N.0.11-09-88 a 100165 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTOL $2159051.90 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.8-10-88 • �� 100166 SEA COAST DESIGNS S328.60 OFFTCE FURNTTURP b 100167 SEARS9 ROEBUCK 8 CO. $126.71 LAB SUPPLIES 47 10C168 SEARS9 ROEBUCK 8 CO. $42.91 LAB SUPPLIES <. 100169 SHAMROCK SUPPLY S19000.58 .91 100170 SIERRA COPY $49386.54 PRINTING • 501 100171 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $71.00 PHYSICAL EXAMS 521 53 54 L 55 5. 7' _ FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/31/89 PAGE 5 LJ REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ' CLAIMS PAID 06/07/89 POSTING DATE 06/07/89 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 4 ° 100172 SLIDE MAKERS WEST S455.80 PRESENTATION AIDS 6 103173 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS $212.00 SOIL TESTING 7 200174 SOUTHERN CALIF* EDISON CO. $89306.85 POWER 100175 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. S99000.67 DIESEL FUEL 100176 SPEC TECH WESTERN $750.44 WELDING SUPPLIES 100177 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS• INC. $241.50 VALVE ++ 100178 SPEECO $19643.58 SCALE MAINTENANCE 12 100179 STAR TOOL B SUPPLY CO. S19030.61 TOOLS 13 100180 STERLING ART S236.70 GRAPHIC ART SERVICES 14 100181 SUBIA9 INC. $795.00 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 15 100182 SUPER CHEM CORP SI*272POO 16 100183 THE SUPPLIERS S39686.80 HARDWARE +7 100184 TCH ASSOCIATES S1049.80 LAB SUPPLIES 1° 1OC185 TAYLOR-DUNN S39.92 _ELECTRIC CART SUPPLIES i 191 100186 TEL-A-TRAIN $114.60 FILM RENTALS - ELECTRICAL SAFETY 20i 109187 THOMAS TEMPORARIES S29J91.19 TEMPORARY SERVICES 21 100188 TOWNE ADVERTISERS $15 381.69 MAILING SERVICES M.0.4-27-89 :: 100189 TRAVEL TRAVEL $336.90 TRAVEL SERVICES 23 100190 H.O. TRERICE CO. $401.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 24rn 100191 T.S. TRIPP S19J94.00 WINDOW CLEANING z 100192 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY• INC. $63.21 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS �zel� 100193 J.G. TUCKER 6 SON• INC. S19090.13 ANALYZER PARTS �7 100194 U.S. AUTO GLASS CENTER9INC. S337.04TRUCK PARTS 28 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE S127.30 PARCEL SERVICES 29 10019E URBAN ALTERNATIVES $15,926.00 CONSULTING SERVICES RES 89-44 30 100197 VWR SCIENTIFIC it 534.60 LAB SUPPLIES 31 100198 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. S69455.59 FITTINGS/VALVES 32k3l 100199 VAREC DIVISION $43.45 FREIGHT 73 100200 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP $1 169.50 TAB qUPPT,TFS 34 3002D1 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $19147.67 SAFETY SUPPLIES 35 100202 VISTA PAINT CORP. S82.36 PAINT SUPPLIES 36 100203 LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES9 INC. $1 485.25 CONSULTING SERVICES 37 100204 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICE S29308.06 GUARD SERVICES 38 100205 WESTATES CARBON• INC. S838.46 CHEMICALS 39 100206 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $13 026.09 40 100207 JOHN WILEY B SONS9 INC. $25.70 PUBLICATION 141 100208 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES $242.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-26-1 �42 100299 ROURKE 6 WOODRUFF $19416.10 LEGAL SERVICES M.O 10-14-87 43 1OC210 XEROX CORP. $39335.25 COPIER LEASES :•4 100211 GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES $151.45 HARDWARE ,45 100212 RICHARD YOUNG PROD. S314.76 OFFICE SUPPLTER 46 100213 ZIEBARTH AND ALPER $2429460.90 CONSTRUCTION P2-37 j47 ----------------- 146 1491 TOTAL CLAIMS FAID 06/07/89 $596829572.47 so s1 sz :3 ]4 SO 7 FUND NO 9199 — JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/31/89 PAGE 6 L. REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - 2 7 4 a SUMMARY AMOUNT 7 a 62 ACO FUND $ 4,300.06 u d2 F/R FUND 622.717.27 1U 03 PER FUNt9ol!9*_.65 ll CO UND 186,392.31 , 13 A5 OPER FUND 3,267.34 17 14 06 ACO FUND 3.421.78 ,a /7 OPER FUND 3,136.95 - la 17 11 OPER FUND ,a #13 OPER'FUND 480.00 10l .05&6 OPER 320.76 21 05&6 AGO FUND 699,781.10 u 23 07&14 OPER FUND 3 123.81 F 24 JT OPER FUND 602,029.90 X 2, . _ a SELF-FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 626.79 1—Y 2 27 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 126,669.14 �q 29 2e $ c 682 572 L7_ n so a-, 3� APPFOM) BY DI U IS 5 & 11 $4,651,685.98 33 33 3a 37 38 30 40 41 42I 43 M I4a 4a 47 49 401 70 al 52 33 34 se a�s'� - �1 FUNC NO 91�-9 - JT DTST WORKIN, CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/14/89 FACE 1 REPORT 'NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAID C-6/21/89 POSTING DATE 06/21/89 21 31 i3 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT S R P ION 4 14 s 103239 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $723.18 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-34-1 I7 100240 AARON BROTHERS ART MARTS $19 7.26 ENGINEERING PRESENTATION AIDS I° 7 100241 LINCOLN CARFETS 8 INTERIORS $284.00 CARPET CLEANING � j° 100242 AIR ACCESSORIES CO. $11585.06 MECHANCAL SUPPLIES 1'j n 1OC243 LEASING ASSOCIATES/ALLSTATE S1 878.98AUTOMOBILE11,21 'o 100244 ALLIED ELECTRONICS $47.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 3 1 'It100245 AMERICAN CHAIN 8 GEAR CO. 1459.45 CHAIN 6 GEARS 1 ,5, :12 100246 AMERITECH $92.00 COPIER LEASES ;13 100247 THE ANCHOR FACKING CO. $119115.63 HARDWARE/MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 17 14 100248 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $39217.53 - EMPLOYMENT NOTICES & ADS to I1s 100249 ARATEX SERVICES• INC. S49671.97 UNIFORM RENTALS7o I's 10 0 250 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING $240.06 SOIL TESTING ' 17 3002F1 AUDIO VIDEO REFOPTING SERVICE $88.80 VIDEOS 2' 23! ° 100252 AUTO SF-OP EQUIPMENT CO. S11P.69 AUTOMOTIVE PART �2+ ,1Y 00253 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $879846.63 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88 zo 100254 BANANA BLUE PRINT $19198.61 BLUEPRINTING I3i 2' 100255 BANK OF AMERICA NTBSA S2 576.23 VISA CARDS, MEETING EXPENSES �z71 znl 22 101256 P.W. BAKOTTI AND ASSOC. S4t860.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-25,26,P2-32,33,37 291 23 m 100257 BARR DOOR OF SO.ORANGE CTY9INC S19314.`3 DOOR REPAIRS i„ 24 >G 100256 B. BATTMAN S 5 7 5.0 G DEFERRED '- L3 100259 BATTERIES WEST• INC. $623.45 TRUCK PARTS l3J1 zn 100260 BAXTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 529072.37 LAB SUPPLIES �3; 27 100261 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES• INC. SBO.1G CAR WASH TICKETS 1,� ° -� 10C262 P08ERT 9EIN4WILLIAM FROST 6 AS S49600.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-33,34 '7 .29I 100263 BLOCK F COMPANY* INC. $25.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES .78_� 3O 100264 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE FFOCUCTS $1 267.6 OFFICE 3 2 ~ 100265 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE 1307.40 RADIATOR REPAIRS 1411 $197.40 TRUCK PARTS 1CO266 BON-A-RUES UES 431 :33 100267 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC E 39 4 .441 •-- 34 100268 BROWN 4 CALDWELL S5955C.00 LAB SERVICES +51 '33 100269 BROWN 8 CALDWELL CONSULTING $619377.47 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-1 I+„ 3n 1OC270 PURKE ENGINEERING CO. $683.97 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES jai 137 1G0271 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES9 INC. S39192.03 SURVEYING SERVICES sol 3n 300272 GARY G. STREED S1r653.97 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 51; 36 CS COMFANY $19885.47 VALVES 521 +ol I0020273 4 CALTROL • INC. S2e232.77 . INSTRUMENT PARTS 31 41 10C275 CALIF. ASSOC. OF SANITATION $443.30 TRAINING :s41 ss1 42 1CO276 CCFITAL LESTWARD S96.1.86 MECANICAL SUPPLIES 1561 '43 IOC21f CARLETON ENGINEERS $29706.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19,P1-34-2 �57 I 14 100278 MOT/CASTLE $59514.19 LAB EQUIPMENT ;�, - 100279 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM S6 014.il4 PHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 6o1 16I 1CO280 CHAMPION FENCE CO. $817.90 FENCING ' +7 10e281 CHE-MWEST INDUSTRIES. INC. $599717.25 FERRIC CHLORIDE 11-09-88 ia31 ° 100282 A.W. CHESTERTON - L.A. S5991�.88 PUMP PARTS i641 ,91 100283 CHEVRON U.S.A.• INC. S524.25 PAINT SUPPLIES "31 1; 67. 100284 CHRISTTVE CORP. S19272.68 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS 6 1 It; '68. _21 _i 531 i'7c 71 -41 172 »j s I741 =el 7 y FUND NO 9159 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/14/89 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AF43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 1 CLAIMS PAID 06 21/89 POSTING DATE 06/21/89 1� z' WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION „j 4 �a 100285 CORINNE CLAWSON $42.48 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 1 le 100286 COAST INSURANCE AGENCY S21327.00 INSURANCE sl G . .S. o CO. 1 INC. $29776.55 MECHANICAL PARTS 01 e 1OC288 COMPRESSOR CCMFONENTS CF CALIF $11828050 MECHANICAL PARTS I1OI �! 10028.9 COMPUSERVE $60.48 COMPUTER SERVICES 1 O 100290 ONDDR RUBBER R PACKING sl1192.50 RUBBER PRODUCTS 100291 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $29094.45 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES .a I1 1OC292 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $91.34 FREIGHT CHARGES le i13 1OG293 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $59785.70 BLUEPRINTING 17 ' 41 100294 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $123.76 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR Ie1 1°1 a1 100295 COUNCIL ON EDUCATION S195.00 SEMINAR :o1 e l0^.296 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 511215.59 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ! I17 1OC297 CAL WATER $20450 RENTAL EQUIPMENT �le ICT298 LA RP CURTI TRUCK 8 EGUIFMENT $249320:00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.O. 4-13-88 2+1 �19 100299 DANIELS T R S RVICE $11J97.99 TIRES =3) '20 100300 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $2146.00 LAB SUPPLIES 1:7. i 21 100301 DE7URIK AND/OR CS CO. $99255.07 VALVE PARTS !oni 'y22 190302 DIATEC POLYMERS S31JO0.49 ANIONIC POLYMERS M.0.8-10-88 '! '23 rn 100303 DICKSONS $941.28 HARDWARE 24 >G 100304 DIFILIPPO ASSCCIATES $887.75 PRINTING I21 3 = 100305 DORADO ENTERPRISES9 INC. S49514.G6 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 100306 DUNN EDWARDS CORP- 591651.14 PAINT SUPPLIES 7 100307 OUR-RED PRODUCTS $119.87 BUILDING SUPPLIES »I '29 -{ 100308 ENS RESCURCES. INC. 311263.44 CONSULTING SERVICES - REG. 6 LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS301 29 100309 EASTMAN, INC. $624.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES I !30 100310 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $67.C5 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS I+o! 7, 1OC311 ECOANALYSIS. INC. S11251.25 CONSULTING SERVICES - OCEAN MONITORING 41: U rJ 100312 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY 1273.48 PRESENTATION AIDS i.31 33 1OC31' EDWARD L. ELLIOT, JR. $11190.CO ENGINEERIGNS SERVICES �441 34 1CC314 ENA6LE $80.03 PUBLICATION I+91 '33 1OC315 FACTOPY REPRESENTATIVE. INC. $686.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS `4a .7i Je 100316 MARSHALL FAIRP.ES $340.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTIRBUTION .31 37 100317 JAMES FALCONER $19100.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - SCAQMD PERMITS 1491 3e 100318 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $39185.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4.J-20 so. it. �3%1 100319 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. S101,75 AIR FREIGHT 'ezl +O 100320 FIBER GLASS STRUCTURAL ENGR. S21P831.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3e4l 61 100321 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $19783.57 FILTER I SS +el !a2 100322 FISCHER B PORTER CO. $79673.38 CHLORINATION PARTS +3 1DD323 FLAT B VERTICAL CCNCRETE S323.00 CONCRETE CUTTING 37 44 100324 FLO-SYSTEMS $19476.87 PUMP PARTS "e 331 J° IOC325 FOGOMAKER. INC. $129.JG PERMIT REFUND !aol gel 100326 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $130.75 FILM 1z J7 100327 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $296.75 PERMITS +e� 100328 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 521347.31 PAINT SUPPLIES „1 +• 100329 DONALD L. FOX E ASSOCIATES S11825.00 SAFETY CONSULTING '3U 100330 FOx8OR0 CO. / M4G SYSTEMS $29278.51 INSTRUMENT E' 7 sl !ral szl .�I 53 ' 34 1 as 731 :e I74 7`1 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/14/85 PAGE 3 E REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06/21/89 POSTING DATE 06/21/89 2 3 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1.5 100331 FROST ENGINEERING SERVICES CO. b131.78 VALVES 10"332 CITY OF FULLERTON 5132.71 WATER 7 1OG333 G.M.A.C. AND/OR S1J9620.43 VEHICLE PARTS ° 100334 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 55o854.88 TELEPHONE ° 100335 DON GREEK 8 ASSOCIATES $460.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 88-72 10 100336 HADCC INSTRLMENTS $183.63 GAUGE 11 100337 HANEY 8 ASSCC. $lil76.6C MECHANCIAL REPAIRS 13 10033b HARBOUR ENGINEERING $79147.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS T3 00339 CHARLES G. HARDY. INC. $111.30 BUILDING MATERIALS 14 10634P FRED A. HARPER $10450.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION I 15 100341 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $874.47 PUMP ' 1C 1OC342 MATCH B KIRK. INC. $518.53 ENGINE PARTS 17 100343 HEWLETT-PACKAPD $466.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1B 110344 HIGh VOLTAGE ELECTRIC $2 530.06 GENERATORS 19 100345 HILTI. INC. S998.52 TOOL 20 100346 HOERBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. S741.38 COMPRESSOR PARTS 21 100347 HOLTRACHEM WEST* INC. $109549.78 CAUSTIC SODA 22 100348 DONALD D. HONOMICHL 1301I.:u DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 23 IOC349 HOUSE OF EATTERIES $19695.05 BATTERIES 2. FTI 100353 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $59037.29 PAINT SUPPLIES '1 29 = 100351 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $13.60 WATER USEAGE 2a -, 100352 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STMMF $118.19 RUBBER STAMPS 27w 100353 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN CYCL S80.C3 BIKE PARTS , 25 1--1 100354 INGUSTRIAL THREADED PROCUCTS $19683.37 FITTINGS • 29 --- 100355 INFILCO DEGREMONT. INC. $224.64 FREIGHT 30 190356 INGRAM PAPER 519229.60 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 31 100357 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $19142.90 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 32 W 100358 1N PLACE MACHINING CO. S59093.CG MACHINE SHAFT 33 100359 INTERNATIONAL 8USINESS MACHINE S58.04 PRINTER SUPPLIES ` 34 100360 IRVINE RANCH WATER CISTRICI $20.53 WATER USEAGE 35 100361 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $583.75 METERS 35 100362 JENSEN TOOLS 8 ALLOYS $110.24 TOOL J7 100363 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $68.80 ELECTRIC PARTS 35 100364 KAMAN BEARINGS d SUPPLY $667.79 FITTINGS 39 100365 KANER COMPANY S1.253.68 TOOLS .0 100366 KAY-RAYS INC. S1!517.44 INSTRUMENTS .1 1OC367 KEENAN SUPPLY S94.02 REPAIR KIT 42 IM0368 KrYSTONC VALVE $1035.3R VALVE 43 100369 KIMSTOCK INC. 16739750.00 VOC CREDITS M.O.5-10-89 3. 1110370 KING BEARING. INC. S843.71 MACHINE SUPPLIES .5 1OC371 DONALD E. KINNEY $815.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION .5 100372 KIRST PUMP 8 MACHINE WORKS $29742.02 PUMP PARTS 47 100'_77 EASTMAN KODAK CO. $57.19 LAB SUPPLIES ,B 100374 MARTIN KORDICK, SP S852.4J CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-29 5-31 .° 100375 L.B.W.S.. INC. S109.49 WELDING SUPPLIES 50 100376 LASER SUPPLIES B SERVICE $243.58 PRINT SUPPLIES 51 52 53 5. 55, 55 7 i i 1 I FUND NO 915; - JT GIST WGFKIND CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/14/89 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OPANCE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID U6/21/89 POSTING DATE C6/21/89 _ 1 31 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 4 11 100377 LE ROY CRANCALL B ASSOC. $682.71 CONSULTING SERVICES 100376 LIEBERT* CASSIDY 8 FRIERSON 5196a0.G0 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 7 100379 LIMITORGUE CORP. 840719.61 VALVE REPAIRS 6 10038C. K.P. LINOSTROMr INC. $139497.27 CONSULTING SERVICES - MASTER PLAN a 1OC381 MS DATA SERVICL CORP. E84.80LAB SUPPLIES 10 1OL382 MACOMCO S1J9.80 100383 MAGNUS MOBILITY .SYSTEMS $336.34 SERVICE AGREEMENT I TOOL 12 100tP,4 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTSO INC. $2 436.04 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 83 100385 MALCOLM PIR NIE 0 INC. 829881.45 ENGINEERING SERVICES �< 100386 MAkVAC ELECTRONICS $142.73 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 100387 MATT - CMLOPO INC. S2 952.49 CHLORINATION PARTS I 1! 100388 MCKENNA ENGR. 8 EGUIF. $59454.12 PUMP PARTS 1OC389 MERCHANTS 8 MANUFACTUR`RS $600.03 MEMBERSHIP DUES �� 10039P HTCROAGE COMPUTER. S943.40 SOFTWARE 191 100391 MIDLAND MFG. CORP. $436.12 CHLORINATION PARTS . 20 106392 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. $629.43 SAFETY SUPPLIES it 100393 MOORE 8 TABER S49706.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2= 100394 MOTION INDUSTRIES* INC. S217.46 BEARINGS 23 lIC395 MOTOROLA* INC. S230e4.98 PAGERS 24 Im 100396 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES $79.54 CELLULAR SERVICES =� IOD397 NEAL SUPPLY CO. b1r117.83 FITTINGS I 20� 10J398 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACh $4.93 WATER USEAGE _' 100399 NORTHWEST MOTOR WELDIPIG* INC. S51550.00 ENGINE PART 28 t-y 10040G OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $406.34 SAFETY GLASSES . 29 1OC401 NOT. INST. OF STANDARDS $196.01 LAB SUPPLIES i 30 10:402 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. $49 934.65 CHLORINE M.0.10-12-88 I 71 1 100403 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY S170.66 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 12� 100404 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO• $972.20 CHEMICALS 33 100405 OXYGEN SERVICE $ 74. 7 SPECIALTY GASES 34 111416 COUNTY SANITATION DISTPICT S83.52 EMPLOYEE HEALTH PLAN CONTRIBUTION 37 100407 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $99493.49 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 36 1Q040A PSSI S1r653.90 SEWER VIDEOS 37 100409 PACG PUMPS S40504.80 PUMP PARTS 3a 100410 PACIFIC SAFETY EGUIP.MENT CO. $298.81 SAFETY SUPPLIES 39 100411 PACIFIC BELL $14.53 TELEPHONE i 40 100412 PACTEL CELLULAR $93.76 CELLULAR SERVICES 41 100413 FOUL FAFANEK S300.9J PEER REVIEW - TOXICS EPIDEMOLOGY PROGRAM 42 103414 ASR ANALYSIS ANG/6R $911.0� PUMP ANALYSIS 43100415 ARK R 8 SON PUP.LICATIONS. INC $422.41 PUBLICATION u 100416 FARTS ENGINEERING COMPANY $29609.69 COMPRESSOR PARTS 45 100417 PARTS UNLIMITED $535.44 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS .e 10041F PEACHPIT FRESS $26.95 PUBLICATION 47 106419 FEAT* 'MARWICK* PAIN 8 CO. S5ra0a.00 AUDITING SERVICES 4a 1GO420 ROY FENDERGRAFT S 4 4 0.U 0 DEFERRED COMP DISTIBUTION 40 1OC421 PENHALL COMPANY $605.30 CORE DRILLING IOU422 PHOTO B SOUND CO. $10920.29 COMPUTER SUPPLIES/EQUIPMENT 1 71 33 1 5. 30 56 FUND NO 9199 - JT LIST WORK114G CAPITAL FROCESSING DATE 6/14/89 PAGE 5 L REPORT NUMBER. AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ' CLAIMS PAID 06/21/89 POSTING DATE 06/21/69 2 3 WARRANT NO. VENGOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION . IOC:422 PICKWICK PAPER $19�13.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 6 10G424 F1MA GRO SYSTEMS* INC. $449465.45 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.O.5-11-88 100425 FOLYPURE• INC. i22r685.79 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-8-89 ° 100426 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. 53t950.GO INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.8-10-88 ° 1OP427 PULSAFEEDER S19453.38 PUMP PARTS '0 101428 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. $94.13 PUMP PARTS 1 100429 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. 1744.56 TRASH REMOVAL 12 1OC430 RECYC• INC. $669880.0( SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 13 100431 RED VALVE CO.. INC. S49555.88 VALVE PARTS 14 100432 R.A. REED ELECTRIC S2047.00 ELECTRIC REPAIRS 116 100433 REMEDY TEMP $579.09 TEMPORARY SERVICES 16 100434 REMOTE 14ETER RESETTING SYSTEM S39a00.00 POSTAGE 105435 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. S277.22 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 10 IOC416 RENOLD POWER TRANSMISSION $5 o00.CC MECHANICAL REPAIRS ° 10'0437 RICHARDS% WATSON B GERSHON $17t402.62 LEGAL SERVICES 4-8-87 1OG438 RICOH CORPORATION $69.37 COPIER LEASES _' 100439 RICHARD ROLFE $292.24 MEETING EXPENSE 22 100440 ROSEMONT ANALYTICAL $1 015.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1OC4111 POSEMOUNT/UNILOC $298.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES H-4m 100442 JOSEPH T. RYERSON B SON. IP-C. $229.47 STEEL SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. $265.60 PARTS CLEANER = 1OC444 SANCON ENGINEERING 9 INC. $960.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 27 100445 SARGENT-WELCH SCIENTIFIC CC. S131.04 LAB SUPPLIES 26 �-•{ 100446 SCIENCE APPLICATICNS TNT4L S1119683.86 OCEAN SAMPLING M.O.8-10-88 29 -I 100447 SEA. COAST DESIGNS 1319.1"u OFFICE FURNITURE 36 100448 SEA-ILAN $4 615.00 LAB EQUIPMENT _ 31 100449 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $108.50 WATER USEAGE 72 lJl 100450 SEWER EQUIP. CO. OF AMERICA $19192.96 TOOLS 33 100451 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $174.28 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES - ' 100452 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS S616.00 SOIL TESTING 30 100453 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY $250.00 VIOLATION FEE 36 106454 HUGE SOULAGES T123,C0 MEETING EXPENSE 37 1C0455 SOUTH COAST DODGE S19.77 AUTOMOBILE PARTS 30 100456 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $376018.15 POWER 39 100457 SO. CAL. GAS CC. $ 38? 4 NATURAL GAS 40 100458 SOUTHERN COUNTIES CIL CO. $10%349.27 DIESEL FUEL 41 100459 SPEC TECH WESTEPN S19203.4Z WELDING SUPPLIES 43 100460 SPECIAL FLASTIC SYSTEMS, `JC. S65,77 TUBING 43 1OL461 STARBUCK TRUCK REFINISHING S3t175.00 SAND BLASTING +' 100462 STAR TOOL 8 SUPPLY CO. S2 018.52 TOOLS 65 100463 SUBIAl INC. 1530., C VISUAL SUPPORT SERVICES 40 10C46.4 SUMMIT STEEL 374.69 STEEL 47 100465 SUPELCO9 INC. E254.55 LAB SUPPLIES J6 1CC466 SUPERIOR SWEEPING SOUTH 1225.00 STREET SWEEPING 40 100467 THE SUPFLIEPS $4t654.69 HARDWARE 50i 100460 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. 1106.85 TOOLS 51 32 33 6. 36 36 7 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAFIT4L PROCESSING DATE 6/14/85 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID C6/21/85 POSTING DATE 06/21189 �2 3 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 4 100469 TAK TAKAMINL $4,570,CL CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING ° IOC470 TAYLOR-DUNN $633.20 CART PARTS 7 100471 TECHNICAL PRODUCTS 8 CTRLS $954.PC INSTRUMENT PARTS 6 100472 TEKMAR COMPANY $467.43 LAB SUPPLIES 0 100473 THERMO ANALYTICAL9 INC./NOOCAL $72.00 LAB SERVICES 10 10C474 THOMAS TEMPORARIES 5376..'0 TEMPORARY SERVICES 11 100475 THOMASON MECHANICAL CORP. 119736.25 MECHANICAL PARTS 12 1OP476 TORRANCE LOSS CONTROL4CORP. 5895.OP SAFETY SUPPLIES 1 00477 OWNE ADVERTISERS $87.11 MAILING SERVICES 14 1OC478 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE• INC. $165.89 AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES 1e 1G0479 TRAVEL TRAVEL 1988.00 TRAVEL SERVICES IC 10C460 T.S. TRIPP $490.00 WINDOW CLEANING 17 1OC481 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPFLY. INC. $810.97 TRUCK PARTS le 100422 J.G. TUCKER 8 SON9 INC. $675.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS IQ 1C0483 THE REGENTS OF THE $50.00 PUBLICATION 20 100484 U.S. AUTO GLASS CENTERvINC. $138.43 TRUCK PARTS 21 100485 UNOCAL $263.02 UNLEADED GASOLINE 22 100486 THE UNISOURCE CORP. $89170.59 PAPER 23 100487 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $119.2u PARCEL SERVICES 24 rn 10C4P8 UNITED WESTERN ELEVATOR 5319.75 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 2] = 1C04P9 VWR SCIENTIFIC $482.27 LAB SUPPLIES 2e 1OC490 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $62268.15 VALVE PARTS 27 10(491 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP $ 464.23 LAB SUPPLIES 2e IOC492 VEHICLE SPRING SERVIC`_ S21I.30 TRUCK PARTS 2Y 1 P C 4 9 3 VERTEX SYSTEMS S19303.06 COMPUTER PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 30 100494 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 5840.42 PAINT SUPPLIES 311 1 200495 RICHARD W. VON LANGEN $343.64 MEETING EXPENSE 32 CT) 100496 JOHN R. WAPLES $537.80 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT 33 100497 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICE S29339.10. GUARD SERVICES 34 100498 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUFFLY S539027.02 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-10-88 33 100499 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $588.25 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 3e I005C0 WESTRUY INTERNATIONAL $124.59 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 37 100501 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES $249318.38 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-26-2,2-26-3.2-27,2-28 39 100502 R OURKE 8 WOODRUFF $432139.52 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.10-14-87 39 1011503 XEROX CORP. 119060.00 COPIER LEASES/SUPPLIES 40 IOf502F _`I­PPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. S64.fC LAB SERVICES I41 lOC!�05 RICHARD YOUNG PROD. S1s299.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES 42 -------- -- ---- 43 44 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID "6/21/89 $291699447.60 .] ----------------- 4e 37 4e 491 ]OI I ]2 ]4 1 _] n mwrnouu�unueiinmio iii wiinu�i�nim14i4ini �lrr �nuuunuwei.wni.,wl.w �unmu rne irn�,w;rrr FUND NO 9199 — JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 06/14/89 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 L1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 06 21 89 POSTING DATE 06 2l 89 ',2 3' I4 SUMMARY AMOUNT a ° 111 OPER FUND 73.66 7 62 OPER FUND 3,762.33 �° /2 ACO FUND 84.00 16 #2 F/R FUND 32 118.88 10 03 OPER FUND 25,209.11 " U3 ACO FUND 228.00 12 5 OPER FUND ;13 /5 F/R FUND 3,538.37 .14 b OPER FUND 1,889.24 ° #6 ACO FUND 852.00 °i 06 F/R FUND 129.00 17 Fill6.181.82 10 B11 OPER FUND 6 456.97 t° 14 OPER FUND 20.53 2J /14 AGO FUND 888.00 =' 05S6 OPER FUND I r 1,336.60 22 9566 ACO FUND 6,954.65 '27 7614 OPER FUND 240.00 24f� TJT OPER FUND 1 11.047.099.77 23j CORF 842,081.28 Z 2° —, SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 11,161.01 I27 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL UND 175,031.33 28 F y i 2G 30 31 J21v APHUIID BY DTSIIUCIS 5 & it $2,097,771.03 3 i. 341 ]3 ]° 37 3° I301 40 ♦1 42 431 44 4] 4° q 4° 4Y SUI 1a 1 52 i33 34 I5' t5e I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 1 are a true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be regarded as surplusage. Chairman Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California Secretary, Bo rd of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 2 are a true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be regarded as surplusage. i rman pro tom Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California Secretary, Boa d of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 3 are a true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be regarded as surplusage. Chai an Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California Secretary, Bo rd of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 5 are a true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be regarded as surplusage. Ch irm n Bo rd f Directors of County Sanita ion District No. 5 of Oran a County, California Sectetary, Boar of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 6 are a true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be regarded as surplusage. Ch rof B irectors of County n District No. 6 of County, California Secretary, Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 7 are a true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be regarded as surplusage. Chairman Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California Secretary, Boa d�of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 11 are a true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be regarded as surplusage. a C i rman Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California Secretary, BoarV of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California • • i I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 13 are a true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be regarded as surplusage. Chaff rtnafn Board of Direc rs of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California Secretary, Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 14 are a true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be regarded as surplusage. Chairman Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California Secretary, Boart of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California • • h STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954 . 2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Adjourned Regular Board Meeting of Districts Nos . 1 , 2, 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 11 , 13 and 14 held on t. 19 R9 was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts ' offices on , 19-. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this —d� day of , 19 . Rita J. Brow , Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 11 , 13 & 14 of Orange County, California