HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1989-07-19 COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS, 19 2, 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14
OF
: ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
ON
JULY 199 1989
_ ye JT Tlo*too°litan v�Is
tt' r dae ►
V
y w
0 s'ace 195dq
9NGE COVE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER
r
L 10200 SLATER AVENUE - HALL B
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
3 .
� �
a•�� 1
ROLL CALL
An adjourned regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on July 19, 1989,
at 7:30 p.m., at the Fountain Valley Community Center, 10200 Slater Avenue, Hall B, Fountain
Valley. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the
Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as
follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: x Robert Hanson, Chairman Orma Crank
x Dan Griset, Chairman pro tem Dan Young
x Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula Kennedy
Roger Stanton x Don R. Roth
T DISTRICT NO. 2: x William D. Mahoney, Chairman Beth Graham
Ron Isles, Chairman pro tem x Carrey Nelson
Roland E. Bigonger x Henry W. Wedaa
x A.B. "Buck" Catlin Chris Norby
x Dan Griset Dan Young
x James Neal George Scott
a Arthur G. Newton Carol Downey
x Bob Perry Norman Culver
a Iry Pickler Fred Hunter
a Wayne Silzel James T. Fasbender
x Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
Roger Stanton x Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Richard Polis, Chairman Orbrey Duke
x Carrey Nelson, Chairman pro tem Wayne Wedin
x Edward L. Allen Paul Verellen
x Wes Bannister Peter Green
x A.B. "Buck" Catlin Chris Norby
x Norman Culver Bob Perry
x Don R. Griffin Donna L. Chessen
x Dan Griset Dan Young
x John Kanel
x William D. Mahoney Beth Graham
x James Neal George Scott
a Iry Pickler Fred Hunter
x J.R. "Bob" Siefen Dewey Wiles
Roger Stanton x Don R. Roth
x Charles Sylvia Robert Wahlstrom
x Edna Wilson Victor Grgas
DISTRICT NO. 5: x John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman Evelyn Hart
x Donald A. Strauss, Chairman pro tem Evelyn Hart
x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: x James Wahner, Chairman James M. Ferryman
x Ruthelyn Plummer, Chairman pro tem Evelyn Hart
x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: x Don E. Smith, Chairman Fred Barrera
x Richard Edgar, Chairman pro tem Ursula Kennedy
x Dan Griset Dan Young
x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton
a Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran
x Donald A. Strauss John C. Cox, Jr.
x James.Wahner Harry Green
DISTRICT NO. 11: x Tom Mays, Chairman Jim Silva
ti x Grace Winchell , Chairman pro tem Wes Bannister
Roger Stanton x Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 13: x Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman Roland E. Bigonger
a Iry Pickler, Chairman pro tem Fred Hunter
x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton
x Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
a Wayne Wedin Ron Isles
DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller
x Ursula Kennedy, Chairman pro tem Richard B. Edgar
x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton
a Sally Anne Sheridan Larry Agran
x Don E. Smith Fred Barrera
-2-
7/19/89
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
Rita J. Brown, Board Secretary, Blake P.
Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G.
Streed, Corinne Clawson, Charles
Nichols, Jean Tappan
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel ,
Kris Lindstrom, Curtis Spencer, Gary
Robbins, Dewey Wiles, Bill Fleming,
Bill Butler, Margaret Johnson, Howard
Johnson, Thomas Pratte, Thomas D.
Lewis, Nancy Skinner, Patrick McNelly,
Don Willet
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Final Program EIR on
Collection, Treatment and Disposal
Facilities Master Plan
Verbal report of environmental
consultant
The Joint Chairman recognized Mr. Curtis Spencer of Jones and StokesO
Associates, Inc. , the independent environmental consultant that prepared
the Environmental Impact Report on the Districts' Collection, Treatment
and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. Mr. Spencer advised that the Final
EIR was prepared in addendum form which meant that the final document was
comprised of the Draft EIR together with the Final EIR. The consultant' s
report included a slide presentation depicting the various elements
covered by the EIR.
Mr. Spencer stated that the Draft Program EIR was distributed for public
review and comment from April 13, 1989 to May 30, 1989. The Draft
document covered possible impacts associated with the proposed
Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, including
growth, construction, operations, public health and marine environmental
issues, plus other potentially relevant impacts. A public hearing on the
Draft EIR was held on May 17, 1989 at the Garden Grove Community Center.
The consultant reviewed the organization of the Final EIR and pointed out
that Chapter 1 is the introduction; Chapter 2 addresses changes and
additions; Chapter 3 includes public comments and the Districts' response
to those comments; and Chapter 4 contains the bibliography. Mr. Spencer
elaborated on some of the changes and additions to the Draft EIR which
are included in the Final EIR. He noted two minor changes in impact
summary tables. He also commented that although the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines suggest that an
"environmentally superior alternative" be identified, the consultants
-3-
5,
&A
7/19/89
could see no technical basis for saying one alternative is
environmentally superior because differences between treatment scenarios
involve trade-offs between land, air and water, and because they are not
in a position to judge whether one is more important than the others. He
further noted that said CEQA guidelines also suggest that a "preferred
alternative" be identified. The Districts' staff has done this. They
recommend eliminating Scenario No. 1 (33% secondary treatment) because it
represents backsliding. Staff recommended Scenario No. 2 (50% secondary
treatment, the current treatment level) based on their evaluation of the
trade-offs. The Environmental Impact Report will support the Boards'
selection of any one of the three scenarios (Scenario 3 is 100% secondary
y treatment).
Mr. Spencer reviewed air quality tables contained in the EIR reflecting
recent results of staff studies of the air toxics emitted during the
treatment process. He pointed out that the new tables show more
significant air toxic emission differences between the various scenarios
than had been indicated in the Draft EIR. The higher the degree of
treatment, the more air toxics that are released. In other words,
secondary treatment releases more air toxics than primary treatment.
The Final EIR also provides cost updates, and Directors were provided
with a revised page of the Final EIR which corrected an error in the debt
service costs for Scenario No. 3.
The consultant pointed out that a revised chart was included in the final
document relative to the numerical relationship between coliform bacteria
and viruses. Figure 7-10 revises the estimate of the risk of contracting
disease from viruses in surf zones to one in six million.
The consultant summarized the types of written responses received on the
Draft EIR. A total of 94 written comments were received, including two
from the Federal Government, six from State agencies, 11 from local and
regional agencies, five from public interest groups, and 70 from
individuals. In addition, 13 oral comments were heard at the public
hearing on May 17th.
Mr. Spencer advised that 55 letters from individuals expressed the view
that the Districts should implement full secondary treatment for all
flows. He noted that some of the letters erroneously referenced
untreated or raw sewage and pointed out that all wastewater receives
primary treatment or advanced primary treatment and 50% also receives
secondary treatment. The consultant' s response to the public comment
that the Districts should implement full secondary treatment, was that
none of the scenarios would impair public health or beneficial ocean
uses; and, that all factors, including public comments, would be
considered by the Districts in reaching a decision.
He also responded to other public comments relative to whether the marine
impacts are adequately addressed in the EIR. Mr. Spencer advised that
the marine impact analysis was based on comprehensive marine monitoring
program results and, accordingly, the consultant' s conclusions remain as
indicated in the Draft EIR.
The following other comments on the EIR were reviewed by the consultant.
He noted that all concerns and comments were addressed in the Final EIR.
-4-
"r 7/19/89
Growth and Effects of Growth - The consultant indicated that the
EIR fully discusses growth and points out that the Sanitation
Districts do not have land use responsibilities and identifies
.,'.. those agencies that do have the land use O
9 responsibilities. The
growth projections are consistent with regional planning agency
; fy estimates.
�. I Air Quality Mr. Spencer noted that the EIR responds to technical
�anar
comments b SCAQMD relative to compliance with regulations,Y P 9 permit
requirements and their Air Quality Management Plan, and states
# that the Districts will comply with SCAQMD regulations, will
obtain the necessary
y permits and will maintain consistency with r
other plans.
sR4E Impacts on Local Agencies - The comments received centered on
construction and operation of facilities, especially within
`a the treatment plants. The findings in the PEIR provide for
adoption of mitigation measures to resolve most of these impacts.
Sludge Management - The consultant noted that the comments received
dealt with the desirability of sludge reuse, landfill impacts
and the limited landfill capacity. The Draft EIR addresses these I
issues and the Final EIR responds more fully to future sludge
, I management planning by the Sanitation Districts.
Water Supply Limitations - In response to the comments suggesting
that the water supply�; � pp y m ay not be available to produce the
" projected wastewater flows, Mr. Spencer stated that the EIR
�. assumes that the Metropolitan Water District will continue to 0
; I obtain the water necessary for the area. However, if water
supply problems do occur or if conservation efforts reduce
future flows, the Master Plan allows the Districts to implement
the treatment expansion program on a slower schedule.
fMitigation Monitoring - Mr. Spencer noted that some agencies
suggested that a mitigation monitoring plan be included in
the EIR itself. However, the consultant indicated that such a
(� plan is more appropriate in the findings to be adopted by the
Boards.
A� The consultant then outlined the actions to be considered by the Boards
relative to the Final Program EIR, which included certification of the
; EIR, adoption of certain findings relating to environmental effects
identified in the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master
Plan adoption of a mitigation monitoring program, adoption of a
statement of overriding considerations that certain impacts aren' t fully
sa ',E mitigated but that the project is more important, and authorizing the
filing of a Notice of Determination documenting the Boards' actions.
k Mr. Spencer concluded that the Boards would also be considering approval
of the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, as well '
as selecting the level of treatment to be included in the Districts'
P ! application to the Environmental Protection Agency and the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board CRW CB for renewal of their NPDE
Ian -5-
!
s
7/19/89
ocean discharge permit, and actual filing of the permit application. He
pointed out that this EIR was sufficient to cover implementation of most
of the Master Plan projects. However, additional CEQA documentation
would be required for the extension of the ocean outfall , and
construction of the interplant pipeline and reclamation plants.
Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Staff Report and Summary dated July 12, 1989 re said Final
EIR be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
7 Receive and file written comments Moved, seconded and duly carried:
received after public hearing
That the written comments received after the public hearing on
May 17; 1989 (included in the Final Program EIR) be, and are hereby,
received and ordered filed.
Receive, file and approve Final Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Program EIR on Collection, Treatment
and Disposal Facilities Master Plan That the Final Program Environmental
Impact Report on the Collection,
Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors do hereby certify that said
Final EIR has been completed in compliance with the State and Districts'
Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
as amended.
Certifying Final Program EIR Moved, seconded and duly carried
by unanimous ballot:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 89-101,
certifying the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the
County Sanitation Districts' Collection, Treatment and Disposal
Facilities Master Plan - 1989. A certified copy of this resolution
is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re terms and conditions of
application for renewal of Districts'
Five-Year NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit
Verbal staff report
The Districts' Director of Technical Services, Blake Anderson, addressed
the Board. He indicated that two years ago the Districts embarked on a
comprehensive study to determine the appropriate wastewater management
program to meet the growing service needs of Orange County and the
increasingly stringent environmental standards. During the Districts'
review process, three alternative treatment levels were studied to
determine their overall impact on air, land and water resources.
-6-
7/19/89
t
Mr. Anderson reviewed the following three alternative treatment levels
considered:
i
3 SCENARIO NO. 1 - California Ocean Plan
r� N
° 30% Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Removal
° 75% Solids Removal k
(One-third of flow would receive secondary treatment)
SCENARIO NO. 2 - Existing Permit Conditions
° 60% Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Removal i
75% Solids Removal
Ck1� I
(One-half of flow would receive secondary treatment,
same as existing concentration) � N
SCENARIO NO. 3 - Full Secondary Treatment (by 2005)
E
85/. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Removal
° 85% Solids Removal
i (Entire flow would receive secondary treatment)
s He noted that under all three scenarios the Districts would continue to
s;a provide primary treatment or advanced primary treatment to the entire O
flow. '
t
11
1 It waspointed
ointed out that the results of the EIR indicate that all three
13 scenarios meet existing regulations, will not impair the beneficial
uses of the marine waters off Orange County' s coast, and will not cause � Pui:�'
significant impairment of the environment.
� I
Staff recommended that the Boards approve Scenario No. 2 which provides
for continuation of the present level of treatment. This includes
primary treatment and advanced primary treatment to all of the flow and
secondary treatment to one-half of the flow. Mr. Anderson stated that „ fir
this recommendation was based on a thorough evaluation of the a
engineering, environmental and financial information contained in the
"Action Plan" and on all of the public commentary received during the ,.,
Districts' public participation program.
E He added that the staff' s recommendation also encompasses the entire '
j� comprehensive wastewater management plan and environmental protection ,,-
' program that is included in the Districts' "2020 VISION" report.
Mr. Anderson noted that 112020 VISION" contained it elements which would ,',
ensure continued protection of public health and the beneficial uses of
the ocean, would provide for the wisest management of limited public and
4
natural resources, and would promote balanced environmental management.
He then briefly reviewed each of the following elements of the "2020 '
VISION plan. O '
B,
-7-
8 q'
jaE� ii,I
9 i
h�
7/19/89
Element 1 - Ocean Protection
Mr. Anderson stated that the Districts' wastewater treatment
program would continue to protect the marine environment and
the beneficial uses of the ocean as well as public health.
Element 2 - Balanced Environmental Protection
It was pointed out that the Districts will maintain a wastewater
management program that minimizes cross-media impacts. The
Districts' existing level of treatment balances the impacts
on the air, land, water and energy resources and protects
their beneficial uses from impairment. He advised Directors
that the Districts would continue their extensive environmental
monitoring efforts to assure the effectiveness of their
environmental protection programs. If the monitoring efforts
ever begin to detect a problem, the Districts would change their
programs accordingly.
Element 3 - Wastewater Facilities
Staff reiterated that all flow will receive primary or advanced
primary treatment and 50% will receive secondary treatment.
Collection, treatment and disposal facilities will be constructed,
as necessary, to meet the increased demands of the service areas
of the Districts. Mr. Anderson noted that flow projections are
expected to increase to 400 mgd by the year 2020. He further
pointed out that within the next five years, the Districts would
be adding new secondary treatment capacity totaling an additional
49 mgd, which is a one-third increase in secondary capacity.
With regard to the cost for the various treatment levels, he
reported that Scenario 2 recommended by staff will cost
$1.4 billion less than Scenario 3.
Element 4 - Toxics Control
The Director of Technical Services stated that the Districts will
continue to aggressively enforce their source control program to
minimize toxics, emphasizing waste minimization and safe materials
substitution. The Districts are pledging to reduce future toxic
mass discharge to less than today's mass discharge. Mr. Anderson
pointed out on a graph which illustrated the Districts' existing
effluent quality compared to the California State Water Resources
Control Boards' Ocean Plan limits, that the Districts were far
below the Ocean Plan limits for effluent heavy metals. He further
noted that the Districts' source control program had been so
effective in reducing heavy metals that even the incoming raw
sewage (influent) meets the California Ocean Plan limits for
effluent.
-8-
7/19/89
I
Element 5 - Sludge Reuse
Staff reported that presently 50% of the Districts' sludge is
beneficial) reused as a composted soil amendment or in direct
Y P 1 �
a agricultural reuse, and the goal is to increase that figure to a
100%. It was pointed out that a dependable sludge management
a alternative is also necessary, and the Districts would seek to
have at least one in-county land disposal alternative as a backup.
Element 6 - Water Reclamation I;I
The new Facilities Plan provides for construction and operation of
up to three new satellite water reclamation plants. 'The Districts
will continue to provide secondary treated wastewater for reclamation
from their Fountain Valley treatment plant, and plan to develop new
markets to maximize reuse of reclaimed water. , I'
i _! Element 7 Water Conservation
Mr. Anderson stated that the Districts' will actively foster and
promote water conservation. This will include developing cooperative
Ali programs with other public agencies to provide public education, { f
community use of water saving devices, amending plumbing codes and {' ' I
{ other appropriate changes to help reduce water usage. lr
Element 8 - Regulatory Compliance
' Staff reiterated that the Districts will continue to consistently
comply with all federal and state laws, regulations, and guidelines O
I designed to protect water quality, air quality, land quality, r'
agricultural productivity, public health and the environment. He r
i particularly emphasized the Districts' continued compliance with the
_ . Federal Clean Water Act and California Ocean Plan.
p
It was pointed out that a 11301(h) waiver" is a provision in the Clean {'
Water Act added by Congress in 1977. The Districts' existing waiver C
and any future waiver is jointly issued by EPA and the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board. Mr. Anderson noted that while a
301(h) waiver does relax the BOD and suspended solids standards of
full secondary treatment, it maintains tough toxics standards and 1
requires protection of beneficial uses. He stressed that the I',1 i
{ ; Districts are achieving these standards today and would continue to do h
so in the future.
1 Element 9 - Energy Conservation
G
Mr. Anderson pointed out that one of the advantages of continuing
with the existing level of treatment is that it requires less energy
than full secondary treatment. He added that the Districts will
41,, ! l
continue to emphasize energy management programs in their wastewater AI{ `,
treatment facilities and would strive to increase the use of digester %iklj
„ gas for energy recovery and production. 1.
C -9- ihll I
I II
7/19/89
Element 10 - Research
Existing research and demonstration programs in marine monitoring, air
pollution control , sludge composting, water conservation, energy
conservation, industrial pretreatment and waste minimization will be
continued in the future. Staff indicated that the Districts will
continue operational research to maximize operational efficiency.
Element 11 - Public Education
The Districts plan to continue their community outreach efforts
which will include information on all of their ongoing programs.
Development of a speaker' s bureau is also planned. Mr. Anderson
briefly outlined some of the public education methods utilized
during the past year and a half relative to the Districts' 30-year
"Action Plan" and other District activities, including distribution
of 10,000 fliers, brochures and announcements, direct contact with
over 2,600 people, and conducting approximately 100 tours and
presentations. He stressed the Districts' commitment to
community involvement.
Mr. Anderson reiterated that "2020 VISION" was a progressive approach
with a global perspective toward complete environmental management
with the community' s overall best interests in. mind. He noted that all
of the issues would again be reviewed in 1995 as the ocean discharge
permit is only issued for a five-year period. Careful environmental
monitoring and assessment will provide safeguards against future adverse
impacts on the ocean. The Director of Technical Services concluded that
the elements of "2020 VISION" reinforce the Districts' long-standing
commitment to sound, cost-effective environmental management based on
supportable scientific data.
Receive and file Final Staff Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Recommendation on "2020 VISION"
Action Plan That the Final Staff Recommendation
on "2020 VISION" Action Plan for
Wastewater Management and Environmental Protection, 1990-2020, dated
July 19, 1989, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
Receive and file communications Moved, seconded and duly carried:
re suggested levels of treatment
to be included in Districts' The the letter from the Chairmen of the
application for renewal of NPDES Newport Beach Harbor Quality Citizens
Permit Advisory Committee and Environmental
Quality Affairs Committee, dated
July 17, 1989, suggesting the Districts phase-in full secondary
treatment; and the letter from the President of the National American
Cetacean Society, dated July 17, 1989, requesting full secondary
treatment for all flow, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed.
Public Comment
The Joint Chairman pointed out that this meeting was not for the purpose
of a public hearing but four individuals had requested to speak and he
wished to acknowledge them at this time.
-10-
7/19/89
The Chair then recognized the following persons who addressed the Boards: ;;'!,
1 Y
! Margaret Johnson, 19742 Shorecliff Lane, Huntington Beach O
Mrs. Johnson stated that she represented the American Cetacean Society
and was also a member of Green Peace. She referred to an article in
NEWSWEEK relative to environmental impacts on human life in the future
and related that to the issue of full versus partial secondary : !''. j
' g treatment. She urged the Orange County Sanitation Districts to follow
the examples of the Cities of Los Angeles and San Diego and go to full
f € secondary treatment. She expressed concern that if the Districts ,',;'''
waited five years to consider full secondary treatment, the financial ';i'
j burden of constructing the necessary treatment facilities may be too ;;,' .
great for the average taxpayer.
Thomas D. Lewis, 2810 E. 57th Street, Long Beach '
Mr. Lewis stated that he was a marine biologist and that he
represented the International Membership of the American Cetacean
' Society. He indicated that from his experience in testing marine °I
mammals that have been beached on the Southern California coastline,
very high levels of DDT and PCB's are shown in their blubber layers.
He also noted that many fish that have been studied, particularly in
the Santa Monica Bay region of Los Angeles County, have been found to
contain extremely high levels of DDT and PCB also. He expressed ''''
concern that Orange County would develop the same pollution problems
as Los Angeles County. In his view, the current level of pollution is ;
already impacting the marine environment. On behalf of the American
Cetacean Society, he urged full secondary treatment.
O
Nancy Skinner, 1724 Highland Drive, Newport Beach I ,e,,
Mrs. Skinner acknowledged the service that the Districts provide and
complimented the management staff for their efforts and for providing
?' information to her. She suggested that perhaps a fourth scenario
should have been considered providing for a level of treatment in
between Scenario 2 and Scenario 3. Mrs. Skinner expressed her view
that by removing more solids, this would reduce toxics and viruses in
the effluent. She was particularly concerned relative to viruses
which she believed could survive for days or weeks in the marine
environment. Mrs. Skinner questioned whether staff had evaluated any
other compromise levels of treatment. She noted that she realized
that the Districts would still require a waiver if they chose any ?'"
compromise treatment level other than full secondary, but felt her off
suggestion would help alleviate some of the unknown impacts in the
future. j''
Thomas Pratte (no address given)
Mr. Pratt, representing the Surf Rider Foundation, commented that, in
his view, public health could be adversely affected by the discharge
of effluent into the surf zone even if it had received secondary
treatment. He expressed concern that it would be too late to correct
the situation if the Districts and others wait until a problem
develops in the marine environment. He noted that the cost of
treatment in Orange County was far less than in other parts of the
nation. Because of the unknown long-term effects of viruses in the
effluent on marine mammals, as well as humans, he indicated that in
his opinion, the prudent decision would be to go to full secondary , ,
treatment as soon as possible.
A,
7 q, IWO&
{
1.�
i
7/19/89
Discussion, consideration and
adoption of Preferred Treatment Level
Scenario re NPDES Permit Renewal
Directors then entered into a lengthy discussion of the "2020 VISION"
Action Plan for Wastewater Management, the Environmental Impact Report
and the public commentary.
Director Edgar stated that he had participated throughout the process and
had critically and carefully reflected on the thorough engineering and
scientific information, and expressed his view that Scenario No. 2
clearly provided for expansion of the Districts' secondary treatment
process according to the needs of the community and ensures a level of
treatment which has proven to effectively protect the public health and
environment.
It was moved by Director Edgar, and seconded, that Scenario 2 [advanced
primary treatment to all wastewater flows plus secondary treatment to
one-half of the wastewater flows, resulting in 75% removal of suspended
solids and 60% removal of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)] be approved
and adopted as the preferred level of treatment to be included in the
application to the U.S. Environmenal Protection Agency (EPA) and the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) for renewal of
the Districts' National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
ocean discharge permit for the five-year period beginning February 1990.
It was pointed out by immediate-past Joint Chairman Smith that the
Districts' strive for operational and maintenance excellence and he noted
that their efforts had been recognized by the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board who had nominated the Sanitation Districts for
awards of excellence which are given annually by the Environmental
Protection Agency. EPA concurred with the Regional Board' s
recommendation and awarded Certificates of Excellence to the the
Districts for the last two years.
Director Strauss asked for comment in response to Mrs. Skinner' s remarks.
Staff concurred that if the Districts were to maintain their existing
mass discharge levels of BOD and suspended solids, they would need to
continue to build increasingly larger increments of secondary treatment
facilities and would, by 2050, achieve full secondary treatment. For the
30-year Action Plan the overall costs and environmental impacts would
fall somewhere between Scenarios 2 and 3. The Director of Technical
Services pointed out that there is a continuum of options between the
ranges of the three scenarios. Staff and consultants discussed many of
these options before selecting the three that have been analyzed and
addressed in the EIR, each requiring a tremendous amount of engineering
and environmental study. He added that with a level of treatment between
Scenarios 2 and 3, the overall discharge of toxics would remain
essentially the same because of the Districts' source control program,
which is the primary reason for the current and expected ongoing success
in reducing the level of toxics being discharged.
In response to a question from Director Polis, staff reiterated that the
Districts regulate the discharge of BOD from the ocean outfall through
both industrial source control and the treatment process. Additional
increments of secondary treatment facilities will be added over the next
five years to keep up with the needs of the Districts' service area while
maintaining the 50% secondary treatment level .
-12-
�p,b•''I s'
a7/19/89
Director Cox asked staff to elaborate on the cost issues comparing
current construction costs with future costs due to inflation. Staff
advised that under any scenario additional facilities will be constructed a
r
f6 i only in incremental units to keep pace with service demands as flows
increase. Although construction costs will escalate if the Districts
Vill delay construction of additional secondary treatment facilities it was
pointed out that the cost of operation and maintenance of these
facilities if built now would be substantially more than the rate of
e
inflation if said facilities were constructed later.
. ' Vice Joint Chairman Catlin commented on his close involvement in the EIR
3j process and in the complex and technical issue of selecting the ,
appropriate level of treatment. He noted that his decision to support
Scenario No. 2 was based on three major considerations:
i
.;° Capital Costs - Mr. Catlin commented that although it may be
�
IliI ideally desirable to go to full secondary treatment, it would
� greatly increase capital costs resulting in major increases in
z , the fees paid by the citizens of Orange County. He further
observed that the cost of full secondarytre
atment
eatm must be
considered along with costs associated with some of the other
infrastructures in Orange Count such as transportation,
� ,5•I. , � � 9 Y� p
air quality management, solid waste disposal and flood control ,
all of which will place additional financial burdens on the
public in the future.
Cross-media Impacts Impacts such as increased energy, increased
air problems and increased solids residuals are associated with
full secondary treatment, and, as pointed out in the EIR, would O
' actually result in a negative economic, as well as environmental ,
yIR, , impact. Full secondary treatment greatly increases the amount of
residual solids to be disposed of requiring greater landfill
capacity. Until sludge disposal
dyl., g p problems can be resolved, he
suggested that a middle-ground approach would be more practical .
' ! Scientific Justification for Continued Waiver - The Vice Joint
,t Chairman stated that in his view there is sufficient scientific
data and expertise, in contrast with the generalized public
commentary, to justify the continuation of the 301 h waiver and
avoid the unnecessary capital expense associated with
Y P P th full
secondary treatment. M r. Catl
in commented that the Dis
tricts cts
I
have an excellent reputation and record, both nationally and
internationally, of pursuing source control programs to protect
public health and safety and the environment Y and will continue
Id
I to do so.
Mr. Catlin added that he is personally acquainted with Roger Revelle of
Scripps Institute of Oceanography and holds him in the highest regard,
j1 and that he is persuaded by Mr. Revelle and other Scripps scientists'
�;i�,.� ; }, statements that full secondary treatment for deep ocean dischargers is unnecessary. Vice Joint Chairman Catlin urged Directors to support
'j Scenario No. 2 based on all of the testimony and technical data presented
and reviewed to date.
§1' i -13-
i
E u
7/19/89
Director Winchell urged support of full secondary treatment (Scenario 3).
She stated that although the Districts' program was excellent, she felt
changes in marine organisms and the ecosystem are very slow to occur and
not easily perceived.
Director Winchell observed that in the past man has erred in their
knowledge of the planet and expressed concern that any potential negative
marine impacts be avoided. She also commented that she believed the
Scripps scientists' remarks were more directed to other areas with
different conditions and reiterated her concern that the Boards not take
an action that might potentially result in cumulative, slow-moving
impacts.
Director Kennedy stated that when she began the study of this program, on
her first reading, she supported full secondary treatment. However, she
was now convinced that, for at least, and maybe only, the next five
years, the Districts can go to Scenario 2 without damaging the
environment. She stated her reasoning was based on the face value of
opinions of the very prestigious Scripps oceanographers who evaluated
full secondary treatment and found that it was not necessary nor
warranted under circumstances that we in these Districts have.
Mrs. Kennedy further observed that her decision was based on the
Districts' commitment to sludge reuse; water conservation; and the
commitment by the Districts that if there are unacceptable impacts,
secondary treatment would be tightened.
Director Kennedy also stated that consideration of the total environment,
which was brought up by Mr. Catlin, was another consideration of hers.
If the Districts go to full secondary treatment, our land environment is
going to take an impact that is worse than our ocean is taking under
Scenario No. 2. She added that she was also persuaded because this is a
five-year permit and will be reviewed again every five years.
Mrs. Kennedy also noted a problem that the Districts face and are not
responsible for is the storm drains and their impact upon the ocean, and
the fact that the Districts often take the rap for the storm drain
problem. She stated she believed that the storm drains are a great deal
of the problem pointed out by the public.
Director Kennedy also observed that while the added economic cost of full
secondary treatment was also persuasive, it would not have changed her
vote for the treatment level if she felt it was right. With assurances
that the present level of treatment will be maintained, Director Kennedy
stated she supported Scenario No. 2.
Director Plummer indicated her support for Scenario No. 3. She stated
that although the EIR states that none of the scenarios are
environmentally superior, this scenario was the environmentally superior
alternative with regard to impacts on ocean resources. Director Plummer
stated her opinion that the increase in the cost to the public for full
secondary treatment would be nominal compared to the possible unknown,
long-term effects on the ocean.
-14-
1 1 ,
J
a
1 „ ` 7/19/89
Director Mays stated that the treatment level question had been a very
difficult decision for the Huntington Beach delegates Although the O economics of the program are significant regardless of the scenario, he
did not believe that cost was the major issue. He stated that the major
factors in their determination to support Scenario 3 were environmental .
A substitute motion was then offered by Director Mays, and seconded, to
support Scenario 3 (advanced primary treatment to all wastewater flows
plus secondary treatment to all wastewater flows, resulting in 85%
removal of suspended solids and 85% removal of BOD).
Director Mays stated that with the expected build-out of the County, full
secondary treatment would maintain the amount of solids currently
j permitted to be discharged and reiterated his concern for ocean
protection.
Joint Chairman Hoesterey observed that a member of the public had
expressed concern about DDT and PCB's P and asked staff whether the
! ' allowable emission of DDT and PCB would be different if the Districts'
'! waiver were renewed. Staff advised that the actual limitations under
which the Districts operate would be the same under Scenarios 2 or 3 for
DDT and PCB. He further noted that because of the Districts' source
control program and because both of those materials were banned from the
general public's use since the early 1970' s, the Districts detect no PCB
in their effluent today, nor do they expect any in the future. With
regard to DDT, normally none is found in the effluent, although
t {{ ' occasionally very low levels are measured. The Director of Technical
Services stated that under any treatment scenario DDT and PCB are
essentially a non-issue for the Orange County Sanitation Districts, based O
3 on an exhaustive study performed a few years ago.
Joint Chairman Hoesterey then commented that he, along with the other
Directors, had carefully studied the treatment level issue and looked at
f � ', ; 'I'i all of the alternatives, weighing them against cross-media impacts.
Mr. Hoesterey said that as others had stated, the economic factors had
I ` probably been one of his least considerations until he considered where
that money could best be used to help mitigate overall impacts on our
environment.
The Joint Chairman pointed out that if the Board decided that evening to
'`"
go to full secondary treatment (Scenario 3) that decision would be
irreversible and the Districts would begin immediately to implement the
plan over the next 15 years. However, if Directors chose. Scenario No. 2
based on all of the data provided by staff and consultants, and the
Scripps Institute people, it would not be an irreversible decision. He
further pointed out that should data or conditions change warranting an
!; increase in the level of secondary treatment, that option is always
available to the Districts at any time.
The Joint Chairman commented on the Districts' reputation of being an
' environmentally sensitive agency that has no
Y 9 Y t only performed to
established limits, but at a level significantly better than what legal
a, ; ! limits are, and stated that this agency will continue to do the best job
possible in the future. Mr. Hoesterey stated that contrary to the
-15-
y �7
4"1
A,I 1 61
J
7/19/89
remarks of one of the members of the public that if the Districts sought
continuation of the waiver, they would "be getting away with something" ,
that has not been the policy or direction of the Boards in the past, and
he did not believe it would change in the future. He reiterated that the
Districts are concerned with environmental impacts on all media--the
ocean, the air and the land--and have implemented their own controls far
exceeding any regulatory controls placed upon them.
Joint Chairman Hoesterey then stated that he would support the original
motion in favor of Scenario No. 2 as the prescribed level of treatment to
be included in the Districts' application for renewal of their ocean
discharge permit, and that he would oppose the substitute motion for
Scenario No. 3.
The Joint Chairman then called for a vote on the substitute motion in
support of Scenario 3 (full secondary treatment) as the preferred
treatment level alternative.
Following a roll call vote, the Secretary reported that the substitute
motion had failed by virtue of eight Districts voting to defeat the
motion and one District voting for the motion.
The Joint Chairman then called for a vote on the original motion that
Scenario 2 (advanced primary treatment to all wastewater flows plus
secondary treatment to one-half of the flows) be approved and adopted as
the preferred level of treatment to be included in the application to the
EPA and the CRWQCB for renewal of the Districts' NPDES ocean discharge
permit for the five-year period beginning February 1990.
Following a roll call vote, the Secretary reported that the original
motion had passed by virtue of eight Districts voting in favor of the
motion and one District voting against the motion.
It was then FURTHER MOVED, seconded and duly carried that the Districts'
staff and consultants be, and are hereby, directed to prepare and file an
application with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, based on the Scenario
No. 2 preferred treatment level approved and adopted by the Boards, for
renewal of the Districts' National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Permit, in accordance with the provisions of Section 301(h) of the
Federal Clean Water Act.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Collection, Treatment
and Disposal Facilities Master Plan
dated February 1989
Approving 1989 Master Plan Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilites Master Plan, dated
February 1989, consisting of the following volumes, be, and is hereby,
approved and adopted:
-16-
7/19/89 ,
i y
Volume Title
Summary Re Vol ume 1 0
y Report
p
Volume 2, Parts 1-3 Joint Works Treatment and Disposal ,.
Facilities {
Volume 3 Potential Water Reclamation Plants !';',
Reconnaissance Report
Volume 4, Parts 1,2 Trunk Sewer Conveyance System ;
Volume 5 Computer Control , Monitoring and
Data Handling Systems '+'
Volume 6 Reliability Analysis
Volume 7, Parts 1-3 Disaster Preparedness Plan
Volume 8 Financial Plan
Directing staff to implement Moved, seconded and duly carried:
elements of Facilities Master
Plan to effect Scenario No. 2 That the staff be, and is hereby,
treatment level adopted by Boards directed to implement appropriate , i
elements of the adopted 1989 Facilities
Master Plan to effect the treatment level proposed in Scenario No. 2
(advanced primary treatment to all wastewater flows and secondary
treatment to one-half of the wastewater flows) to be included in the
application to EPA and CRWQCB for renewal of the Districts' NPDES ocean
discharge permit, as previously determined by the Boards of Directors.
Directors Tom Mays and Grace Winchell requested that their votes in
opposition to the motion be made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by
Making certain findings re roll call vote: '' !;
environmental effects identified in r
1989 Facilities Master Plan and That the Boards of Directors do hereby
adopting a statement of overriding adopt Resolution No. 89-102, making
considerations based on treatment certain findings relating to
level included in Scenario No. 2 significant environmental effects
identified in the Collection, Treatment
and Disposal Facilities Master Plan dated February 1989 ("The Project") based
on the treatment level included in Scenario No. 2 (advanced primary treatment
to all wastewater flows and secondary treatment to one-half of the
wastewater flows) ; adopting a statement of overriding consideration; and
1i
authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination re said project. A ,,
certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes.
-17-
r
ra
II WE
7/19/89
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m. , July 19, 1989.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m. , July 19, 1989.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m. , July 19, 1989.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m. , July 19, 1989.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m. , July 19, 1989.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m. , July 19, 1989.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 9:15 p.m. , July 19, 1989.
(THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE CONTINUED FROM THE REGULAR MEETING HELD
ON JULY 12, 1989 DUE TO LACK OF QUORUM IN DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 11) :
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held June 14, 1989, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-18-
-311 5 3 Ep s t #a
i t
7/19/89
DISTRICT it There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting
held June 14, 1989, the Chairman ordered 0
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICTS 5 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint
and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual
District claims set forth on pages "A" and
"B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be,
f and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated.
6/07/89 6/21/89
Ft ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 602,029.90 $1,047,099.77
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 3,214,330.61 842,081.28
Joint Working Capital Fund - 126,669.14 175,031.33
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 626.79 11,161.01
DISTRICT NO. 5 7,873.12 7,649.42
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 54.56 6,456.97
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 700,101.86 8,291.25
4,651,685.98 2,097,771.03
DISTRICTS 5 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing and directing execution
and filing of documents necessary That the following resolutions
,.,
for Federal and State Grants for authorizing and directing execution and
-'' the 1988-89 Joint Works Improve- filing of documents P g necessary for
►� ; . ments and Additions Federal and State Clean Water Grants and
ijl ! Loans under 33 U.S.C. , 1251 et seq. ;
Chapters 12.5, 13, 14 and 15; and Division 7 of the California Water Code, and
providing certain assurances in connection with the 1989-90 Joint Works
Improvements and Additions, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards
of Directors:
►� f District No. Resolution No.
5 89-70-5
i a 11 89-73-11
�t
Certified copies of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of
? these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
+' Authorizing the Selection Committee
to negotiate Addendum No. 1 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is
Professional Services Agreement hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum
with The Keith Companies for design No. 1 to the Professional Services
and construction services re Agreement with The Keith Companies for
tl f . Contracts Nos. 5-35 and 5-36 design and construction services
required re South Coast Trunk Sewer,
Contract No. 5-35, and Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, to
provide for changes in the scope of work initiated by The Irvine Company, City
of Newport Beach and Laguna Beach County Water District re project alignment O
in Pacific Coast Highway and the construction schedules for said projects (the
; . project costs are being paid by the proponents) .
n -19-
f� N
7/19/89
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and deny claim of
Hamish Michael re Contract No. 5-31 That the claim of Hamish Michael dated
May 31, 1989, in the amount of $248.19
for damage to his auto windshield from debris, allegedly in connection with
construction of Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main, Contract
No. 5-31, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the District' s
` General Counsel , liability claims administrator, contractor and contractor's
insurance company for appropriate action.
DISTRICTS 5 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Creating a Capital Facilities Fund
and terminating the Accumulated That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Capital Outlay Fund and the the following resolutions, creating a
Facilities Revolving Fund Capital Facilities Fund and terminating
the Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund and
the Facilities Revolving Fund in each District:
DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO.
5 89-84-5
11 89-87-11
Certified copies of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and unanimously
Approving 1989-90 fiscal year carried by roll call vote:
budget
That the District' s 1989-90 fiscal
year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the
following amounts:
Operating Fund $ 6,766,000
Capital Facilities Fund 8,249,000
Bond & Interest Fund - 1951 52,000
TOTAL $ 15,067,000
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and unanimously
Approving 1989-90 fiscal year carried by roll call vote:
budget
That the District' s 1989-90 fiscal
year budget be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved in the
following amounts:
Operating Fund $ 7,302,000
Capital Facilities Fund 10,652,000
Bond & Interest Fund - 1951 14,000
Bond & Interest Fund - 1958 29,000
TOTAL $ 17,997,000
-20-
I"
a
anti,ra
4 7/19/89
DISTRICTS 5 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Establishing the annual Gann
appropriations limit for fiscal That the following resolutions establishiro
4YlG year 1989-90 the annual Gann appropriations limit for
s � x fiscal year 1989-90 for each District in
accordance with the provisions of Division 9 of Title 1 of the California
aYl, Government Code, be, and are hereby, adopted by the respective Boards of
Directors:
DISTRICT RESO. NO. LIMITATION
r 5 89-93-5 $ 2,077,000
11 89-96-11 2,209,000
Certified copies of these resolutions are attached hereto and made a part of
these minutes.
DISTRICTS 5 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve Staff
Report re revised Wastewater That the Staff Report, dated June 28,
f Discharge Regulations for the 1989 (Revised) , summarizing revisions to
County Sanitation Districts of the Districts' wastewater discharge
' Orange County regulations, be, and is hereby,
sF; , 1, received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICT 5
Ar , Actions re proposed Ordinance
.,Lq ray,' , No. 520
' First reading of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ITT! Ordinance No. 520
That proposed Ordinance No. 520, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of
Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for
Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 514 and
518, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is
hereby, waived.
' Following the reading of Ordinance No. 520 by title only, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 520, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing
Wastewater Discharge 9 9 a is har Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities,
� .
and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 514 and 518, be introduced and passed to
P 9
second reading and public hearing on August 9, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , at
the District' s administrative office.
Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordinance No. 520 is categorically
exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby
r finds that adoption of Ordinance
No. 520 is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act
Tj (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15308, in that the Ordinance is a regulatory
, I. action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment.
j� 7)S -21-
7/19/89
DISTRICT 11
• Actions re proposed Ordinance
No. 1110
First reading of Proposed Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordinance No. 1110
That proposed Ordinance No. 1110, An
Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of
Orange County, California, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for
Use of District Sewerage Facilities, and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1106 and
1107, be read by title only; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is
hereby, waived.
Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1110 by title only, it was moved,
seconded and duly carried:
That Ordinance No. 1110, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. it of Orange County, California, Establishing
Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District Sewerage Facilities,
and Repealing Ordinance Nos. 1106 and 1107 be introduced and passed to
second reading and public hearing on August 9, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. , at the
District's administrative office.
Making finding that adoption of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordinance No. 1110 is categorically
• exempt per CEQA Guidelines That the Board of Directors hereby
finds that adoption of Ordinance
No. 1110 is categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Guidelines Section 15308, in that the Ordinance is a regulatory
action taken by the District to assure the protection of the environment.
DISTRICTS 5 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Staff Report re
Agreement with County Assessor re That the Staff Report re Agreement with
Supplemental User Fee Processing County Assessor re Supplemental User Fee
Processing, dated June 29, 1989, be, and
is hereby, received and ordered filed.
DISTRICTS 5 & it Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the General Manager to
execute an agreement with the That the General Manager be, and is
Orange County Assessor' s Office for hereby, authorized to execute an
the purchase/lease of property file agreement with the Orange County
data base services required to Assessor' s Office for the purchase/lease
collect supplemental user fees on of property file data base services
the property tax bills necessary to calculate, assess and
collect the Districts' supplemental user
fee charges on the annual property tax bills, the annual cost for said services
to be in the amount fixed by the County Assessor and Board of Supervisors.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
(END OF ITEMS CONTINUED FROM JULY 12, 1989 JOINT BOARD MEETING)
-22-
7/19/89
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment t
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:20 p.m. , July 19, 1989.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman
then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:20 p.m. , July 19, 1989.
I
Secretary of t e Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
f
6
-23-
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/31/89 FAGE 1
L REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/07/89 POSTING DATE 06/07/89
3 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
° 099988 ABC PAINT STRIPING SERVICE $675.00 ASPHALT STRIPING
° 099989 ADAMSON UNIFORM 6 EQUIP. $582.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES
71 099990 A VA CO CONSTAUCTORS9 INC. $192509764.21 CONSTRUCTION PI-26,P2-32,33.34
° 099°91 AIR PRODUCTS 9 CHEMICAL INC. $139069.60 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
099992 AIRGUARD INDUSTRIES• INC. $109.33 ELECTRIC PARTS
099993 ALLEN GMC TRUCKS $14t085.28 NEW VEHICLE
11 099994 THE ANCHOR PACKING CO. S19181.55 MECHANICAL PARTS
12 099995 ANIXTER - WIRE 6 CABLE L124.24 INSTRUMENT PART
a0999V6 ANTELOPE A EQUIP, S11958.08 TRUCK PARTS
1+ 099997 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $29072.78 NOTICES 6 ADS
1, 099998 ARATEX SERVICES• INC. S121.90 UNIFORM RENTALS
I� 099999 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PROD.• INC S85.86 BUILDING MATERIALS
17 100030 ASSOC. PUBLIC SAFETY $125.00 INSTRUMENT SERVICE
i° 100001 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING $19404.50 SOIL TESTING
1GI __1000H THE AVEBURY OUP S141.T8 CONVEYOR PARTS
=1 100003 AVIS CAR LEASING S18 062.00 NEW VEHICLES
100004 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S469869.39 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88
22 100005 PoW. T ND ASSOC. S59700.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-25626,P232,33,34,37
I23 209306 BANTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $39312.37 LAB SUPPLIES
2+ rn 100307 BENZ ENGINEERING• INC. S316.73 COMPRESSOR PARTS
i
251 z 100008 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS S715.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES I
ae! 11 100009 BON-A-RUES $86.20 TRUCK PARTS
tDj 100010 BROOKS PRODUCTS $89130.00 VAULTS
=tl ' 100011 R WN 6 CALDY LL CONSULTING $799892.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-37,J-23-1
2. 100012 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $205.70 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
30 100013 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES• INC. S440.00 LAND SURVEYING
31' 1 100014 GARY G. STREED $575.52 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
J21 J_ 103015 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY S172.78 PAPER
33 100016 C E R RECONDITIONING CO. $350.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
100017 CS COMPANY $89702.51 VALVE
[:3:l
100018 CSI-CALTROL $19372.08 MECHANICAL PARTS
100019 CAL-CHEM SALES S148.40 SAFETY SUPPLIES
100020 JOHN R. CALAPRICE# PHD $49590.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - OCEAN MONITORING
3e 100021 CAROLLO-BOYLE9A JOINT VENTURE S299864.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 87-131
30 100022 CASE POWER 8 EQUIPMENT $593.11 TRUCK PARTS
.0 200023 CENTURY SAFETY INST. 8 SUPP. S2 029.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES
.1 100024 CHEMWEST INDUSTRIES. INC. S66°307.03 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-09-88
42 100025 CHEVRON U.S.A.. INC. $39143.39 OIL 6 GREASE
d3 200026 CHLORINATORS d CONTROLS9 INC. $774.18 CHLORINATION PARTS
•a 100027 DALE CHRISTIAN STRUC. ENGR. S19200.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-20
45 100028 CHRISTEVE CORP. S166.086.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-31
401 100029 CORINNE CLAWSON $32.02 MEETING EXPENSE
i.:I7 100130 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CALIF $49945.50 MECHANICAL PARTS
atl 100031 CONNELL G.M. PARTS / DIV. $174.12 TRUCK PARTS
+0 00032 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $69194.45 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
°0 100033 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $222583.65 BLUEPRINTING
I°1
ez
°3
°4
SS
IJ
e
�7
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/31/89 PAGE 2
[_ REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/07/89 POSTING DATE 06/07/89
2
3 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
•
° 100034 CONTROL CABLESS INC. $57.46 CABLE
° 100035 CONTROL DATA CORPORATION $37 .50 FIELD SERVICES
7 100036 CONTROLCO S97.40t ELECTRIC PARTS
i ° 100037 CORE-INTERNATIONAL 414222.00 COMPUTER PARTS
° 10003a COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $69,34 AUTOMOBILE PARTS
10 200039 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $29097.09 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
- " 100040 CAL WATER S129.50 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
12 100041 LARRY CURTI TRUCK 6 EQUIPMENT $229420,00 SLUDGE REMOVAL - - i
_ 13 100042 STATE OF CALIFORNIA S480.00 SBE PROCESSING FEE
14 100043 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $154.50 HAZARDOUS WASTE TAX I
10 100044 DATA RENTAL AND SALES $33,97 OFFICE I
16 100045 DECO S371o41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
17 100046 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO. S12741.04 VALVE PARTS
10 100047 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $29119,79 PRINTING
19 100048 DORADO ENTERPRISESS INC. $259803.52 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS
20 100049 D°VALS SALES CO. S129o79 FITTINGS
21 100050 E.I.L. INSTRUMENTSS INC. $37 .88 ELECTRONICS
22 100051 EASTMANO INC. $19658.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES
23 100052 W. H. EBERT CORP. S7834037.44 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-2
2• 190053 WoHo EBERT CORP. $3439435.50 CONSTRUCTION 5-29 j
29 x 100054 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY $800030 PRESENTATION AIDS
2.= 100055 ENCHANTERS INCo S44200.00 OCEAN SAMPLING M.0.6-10-87
i
37 -' 100056 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $260.00LAB SERVICES
i 28 100057 FST SAND AND GRAVELS INC. 8234.83 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
20� 100058 JAMES FALCONER $22100.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - SCAQMD 1
70 100099 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. S32500oDO CONSTRUCTION
_ 31 D 100060 FARR SALES 8 SERVICE 8758o79 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
32 100061 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 4155o75 AIR FREIGHT
33 N 100062 FERRELLGAS $29.25 PROPANE
34 100063 FISCHER & PORTER CO. S104022o77 CHLORINATION PARTS
35 100064 FLO-SYSTEMS S608.84 ELECTRIC PARTS
34 100065 GELBER PUMPS9 INC. W4.46 PUMP PARTS
371 100066 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT S511o35 PAINT SUPPLIES
_ 3a 100067 FOUNTAIN VALLEY READY MIN $19613.65 CONCRETE
30 100068 DONALD L. FOX 8 ASSOCIATES 8 SAFETY CONSULTING
40 100069 THE FOXBORO CO. $29214.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
41 100070 FROST ENGINEERING SERVICES CO. 8132.18 VAVLES
42 100071 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $296.50 BUILDING MATERIALS
.3 100072 GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION 91082160.38 CONSTRUCTION J-15A
•+ 100073 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $19764.54 TELEPHONE
ash 100074 GIERLICH-MITCHELLS INC. $14 353.96 PUMP & MECHANICAL PARTS
46 100075 DON GREEK 6 ASSOCIATES $139910.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 88-72
+7 100076 HALPRIN SUPPLY CO. S206.70 OXYGEN SUPPLIES
48 100077 HARBOUR ENGINEERING S34310.73 PUMP PARTS
40 100078 HATCH & KIRKS INC. $49735.31 MECHANICAL PARTS
s0i 100079 So A. HEALY CO. $909000.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-31-1
.2
93
S.
S]
EI r
-- - r-�..-r -a I
- - - - ._
1���^ r �� ��1 art�- �_�• i ff�niGiAi�T'ri .
r
_ FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/31/89 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
' CLAIMS PAID 06/07/89 POSTING DATE 06/07/89
z
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
100080 DAVID HEINZ E46.00 MEETING EXPENSE
4 100081 E.G. HELLER4S SONS INC. E97.30 TOOLS
] 100082 H I C-T-1,75-C. E18.13 HARDWARE
I4 100083 HOERBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. 4 INC. E1r256.48 MECHANICAL PARTS
�1 100084 HORIZON HIGH-REACH S187.86 TRUCK PARTS _
8 HOUSE OF BATTERIES E288.69 BATTERIES
11011 1010086 R.S. HUGHES CO.4 INC. $29478.24 HARDWARE
12 109087 IMO DELAVAL INC. E366.81 ELECTRIC CONTROLS
13 100085 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS E19116.74 GEARS 6 CHAIN
14 100089 INGRAM PAPER E29104.29 PAPER
100090 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO._ E217.76 TRUCK PARTS
I14 100091 INTERNATIONAL TIME RECORDER $89.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
17 100092 JACK M CHANGE $211.47 TRUCK REPAIRS
Irle 100093 RIVIERA FINANCE $19149.90 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
li 100094 JENSEN TOOLS 6 ALLOYS $19346.20 TOOLS
'o 100095 KAMAN BEARINGS 9 SUPPLY E471.30 FITTINGS
2,1 100096 KANER COMPANY E14670.68 TOOLS
u 100097 KAY-RAYS INC. E19407.27 ELECTRONIC PARTS
23 100098 THE KEITH COMPANIES $29765.18 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35536
12.1 m 100099 KIEWIT PACIFIC CO. E141069004.05 CONSTRUCTION
1231 100100 KING BEARING• INC. $29379.63 MECHANCIAL PARTS `
!01= 1OC101 KIRST PUMP 6 MACHINE WORKS $19281.01 PUMP PARTS
1 1"H
l]�r y 100102 MARTIN KORDICK9 SR E3v055.80 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-31.5-29.5-34-1 _
e 100103 LEE 9 RO CONSULTING ENGR. E87s031.00 CONSULTING SERVICES P1-33
I24I--A�-, 100104 LIMITORQUE CORP. E59397.35 INSTRUMENT
30 100105 MDS E50.88 INSTRUMENT
I3 100106 MPS E276.50 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
I321 W 100107 MALCOLM PIRNIE s INC. $189799.41 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 86-146
>; 100108 MARVAC ELECTRONICS E46.71 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
f34 100109 MATT - CHLOR4 INC. E19296.09 CHLORINATION PARTS Y'
30 100110 MCKENNA ENGR. B EQUIP. E169901.13 PUMP PARTS
36 100111 MC KINNEY ELECTRONICS E69.95 GATE PARTS
�] 00112 M D-T X SSOCIATES• INC. E90.00 LAB SERVICES
34 100113 MEDLIN CONROLS CO. E291.44 GAUGE
130 100114 THOMAS MENDEZ $626.79 LIABILITY CLAIM
.0 100115 MICR OAG COMPUTER $61419.16 COMPUTER SOFTWARE S HARDWARE
�41 100116 MIDLAND MFG. CORP. $29889.09 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
42 100117 MLADEN 6UNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO E350 006.36 CONSTRUCTION 143 100118 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES E19420.00 LAB SERVICES -
100119 MOORE 9 TABER E59383.83 ENGINEERING SERVICES DIST 2
'IS 100120 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $160.31 FTTTTNGS
44 100121 NEWPORT BUSINESS INTERIORS E1*015.88 PANELING '
47 1OC122 NORTH SUPPLY E778.93 INSTRUMENT PART
I49 100123 OCEAN SALT CO.. INC. $333.26 SALT
I49 100124 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. E369455.75 CHLORINE M.0.10-12-88
'30. 100129 ONE DAY PAINT 8 BODY S230.16 TRUCK REPAIR
31
32
33
3.
`.3
36
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/31/89 PAGE 4
[_, REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY _
CLAIMS PAID 06/07/89 POSTING DATE 06/07/89
12
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
3 100126 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY $275.07 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
. 190127 ORANGE COAST JEEP $12,588.20 -NEW VEHICLE
7 100128 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $102.29 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
0 100129 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO. 173.03 PESTICIDE
O 100130 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. 2 e4
1O 100131 COUNTY OF ORANGE $339754.48 DISPOSAL GATE FEES
11 100132 COUNTY OF ORANGE $22479.25 PERMIT FEES
12 100133 ROBERT L. CITRON $233.33 DEFERRED COMP DEPOSIT FWAR
13 100134 PACIFIC ELECTRIC9 INC. $151531.49
CONSTRUCTION 3-15
I 100135 PACIFIC ELECTRIC $589139.80 CONSTRUCTION J-15
15 100136 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $ 9 3
1. 100137 PACIFIC BELL S42.54 TELEPHONE
17 100138 PHOTO 0 SOUND CO. S89386.53 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 6 SUPPLIES
18 100139 PICKWICK PAPER $238.00 PAPPR
10 100140 PIMA GRO SYS7EMS9 INC. $449464.55
SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88 •
20 100141 POLYPURE9 INC. $1399371,66
CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-8-89
2, 100142 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. S83.12
22 111143 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE S132.00 ICE
23 100144 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. $42400.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.8-10-88
24 M 1OC145 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. $29308.68 PUMP RF.P&TRq
25 100146 QUEST INTL. MONITOR SERVICE S735.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIR
28 = 100147 RATTRAY AND ASSOCIATES9 INC. SB9650.00 MAPPING SERVICES
27 ~' 100148 RED WING SHOES S123.77 SAFETY SNOES
2a H 100149 R.A. REED ELECTRIC $19533.90 ELECTRIC METER
29 -1 100150 THE REGISTER $12986.90 NOTICES 6 ADS
30 100151 REMEDY TEMP S263.0 TEMPORARY SFRVTCE9
31 100152 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. $66.62 HARDWARE
3? 100153 RICOH CORPORATION S69e37 COPIER LEASES
33, 100154 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO. $19140.98 LAR SUPPT.TFS
34 10C155 ROCCOOS TRUCK WRECKING $127.20 TRUCK PARTS
30 100156 ROSEMONT ANALYTICAL $512.65 ELECTRIC PARTS
30 100157 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC $762.30
7 100158 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S19300.84 ELECTRIC PARTS
3. 100159 RYAN-HERCO S562.35 FREIGHT
30 100160 JOSEPH To RYERSON 8 SONo INC. S7 4.2
a0 100161 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. $199.20 PARTS CLEANER
.1 100162 SANCON ENGINEERING 9 INC. $69400.00 SANDBLASTING
.2 IOC163 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $128.00
43 100164 SCHAEFER DIXON ASSOCIATES $69730.62 ENGINEERING SERVICES N.0.11-09-88
a 100165 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTOL $2159051.90 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.8-10-88
• �� 100166 SEA COAST DESIGNS S328.60 OFFTCE FURNTTURP
b 100167 SEARS9 ROEBUCK 8 CO. $126.71 LAB SUPPLIES
47 10C168 SEARS9 ROEBUCK 8 CO. $42.91 LAB SUPPLIES
<. 100169 SHAMROCK SUPPLY S19000.58
.91 100170 SIERRA COPY $49386.54 PRINTING
• 501 100171 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $71.00 PHYSICAL EXAMS
521
53
54
L 55
5.
7'
_ FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/31/89 PAGE 5
LJ REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
' CLAIMS PAID 06/07/89 POSTING DATE 06/07/89
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
4
° 100172 SLIDE MAKERS WEST S455.80 PRESENTATION AIDS
6 103173 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS $212.00 SOIL TESTING
7 200174 SOUTHERN CALIF* EDISON CO. $89306.85 POWER
100175 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. S99000.67 DIESEL FUEL
100176 SPEC TECH WESTERN $750.44 WELDING SUPPLIES
100177 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS• INC. $241.50 VALVE
++ 100178 SPEECO $19643.58 SCALE MAINTENANCE
12 100179 STAR TOOL B SUPPLY CO. S19030.61 TOOLS
13 100180 STERLING ART S236.70 GRAPHIC ART SERVICES
14 100181 SUBIA9 INC. $795.00 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
15 100182 SUPER CHEM CORP SI*272POO
16 100183 THE SUPPLIERS S39686.80 HARDWARE
+7 100184 TCH ASSOCIATES S1049.80 LAB SUPPLIES
1° 1OC185 TAYLOR-DUNN S39.92 _ELECTRIC CART SUPPLIES
i
191 100186 TEL-A-TRAIN $114.60 FILM RENTALS - ELECTRICAL SAFETY
20i 109187 THOMAS TEMPORARIES S29J91.19 TEMPORARY SERVICES
21 100188 TOWNE ADVERTISERS $15 381.69 MAILING SERVICES M.0.4-27-89
:: 100189 TRAVEL TRAVEL $336.90 TRAVEL SERVICES
23 100190 H.O. TRERICE CO. $401.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
24rn 100191 T.S. TRIPP S19J94.00 WINDOW CLEANING
z 100192 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY• INC. $63.21 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
�zel� 100193 J.G. TUCKER 6 SON• INC. S19090.13 ANALYZER PARTS
�7 100194 U.S. AUTO GLASS CENTER9INC. S337.04TRUCK PARTS
28 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE S127.30 PARCEL SERVICES
29 10019E URBAN ALTERNATIVES $15,926.00 CONSULTING SERVICES RES 89-44
30 100197 VWR SCIENTIFIC it 534.60 LAB SUPPLIES
31 100198 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. S69455.59 FITTINGS/VALVES
32k3l 100199 VAREC DIVISION $43.45 FREIGHT
73 100200 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP $1 169.50 TAB qUPPT,TFS
34 3002D1 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $19147.67 SAFETY SUPPLIES
35 100202 VISTA PAINT CORP. S82.36 PAINT SUPPLIES
36 100203 LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES9 INC. $1 485.25 CONSULTING SERVICES
37 100204 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICE S29308.06 GUARD SERVICES
38 100205 WESTATES CARBON• INC. S838.46 CHEMICALS
39 100206 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUPPLY $13 026.09
40 100207 JOHN WILEY B SONS9 INC. $25.70 PUBLICATION
141 100208 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES $242.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-26-1
�42 100299 ROURKE 6 WOODRUFF $19416.10 LEGAL SERVICES M.O 10-14-87
43 1OC210 XEROX CORP. $39335.25 COPIER LEASES
:•4 100211 GEORGE YARDLEY ASSOCIATES $151.45 HARDWARE
,45 100212 RICHARD YOUNG PROD. S314.76 OFFICE SUPPLTER
46 100213 ZIEBARTH AND ALPER $2429460.90 CONSTRUCTION P2-37
j47 -----------------
146
1491 TOTAL CLAIMS FAID 06/07/89 $596829572.47
so
s1
sz
:3
]4
SO
7
FUND NO 9199 — JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 05/31/89 PAGE 6
L. REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
- 2
7
4
a SUMMARY AMOUNT
7
a 62 ACO FUND $ 4,300.06
u d2 F/R FUND 622.717.27
1U 03 PER FUNt9ol!9*_.65
ll CO UND 186,392.31 ,
13 A5 OPER FUND 3,267.34
17
14 06 ACO FUND 3.421.78
,a /7 OPER FUND 3,136.95 -
la
17 11 OPER FUND
,a #13 OPER'FUND 480.00
10l .05&6 OPER 320.76
21 05&6 AGO FUND 699,781.10
u
23 07&14 OPER FUND 3 123.81
F 24 JT OPER FUND 602,029.90
X 2, .
_ a SELF-FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 626.79
1—Y 2
27 JT WORKING CAPITAL FUND 126,669.14
�q 29
2e $ c 682 572 L7_
n so
a-, 3� APPFOM) BY DI U IS 5 & 11 $4,651,685.98
33
33
3a
37
38
30
40
41
42I
43
M
I4a
4a
47
49
401
70
al
52
33
34
se
a�s'�
- �1
FUNC NO 91�-9 - JT DTST WORKIN, CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/14/89 FACE 1
REPORT 'NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS FAID C-6/21/89 POSTING DATE 06/21/89 21
31
i3 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT S R P ION 4
14 s
103239 ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS $723.18 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-34-1 I7
100240 AARON BROTHERS ART MARTS $19 7.26 ENGINEERING PRESENTATION AIDS I°
7 100241 LINCOLN CARFETS 8 INTERIORS $284.00 CARPET CLEANING �
j° 100242 AIR ACCESSORIES CO. $11585.06 MECHANCAL SUPPLIES 1'j
n 1OC243 LEASING ASSOCIATES/ALLSTATE S1 878.98AUTOMOBILE11,21
'o 100244 ALLIED ELECTRONICS $47.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 3
1
'It100245 AMERICAN CHAIN 8 GEAR CO. 1459.45 CHAIN 6 GEARS 1
,5,
:12 100246 AMERITECH $92.00 COPIER LEASES
;13 100247 THE ANCHOR FACKING CO. $119115.63 HARDWARE/MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 17
14 100248 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $39217.53 - EMPLOYMENT NOTICES & ADS to
I1s 100249 ARATEX SERVICES• INC. S49671.97 UNIFORM RENTALS7o
I's 10 0 250 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING $240.06 SOIL TESTING '
17 3002F1 AUDIO VIDEO REFOPTING SERVICE $88.80 VIDEOS 2'
23!
° 100252 AUTO SF-OP EQUIPMENT CO. S11P.69 AUTOMOTIVE PART �2+
,1Y 00253 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $879846.63 GRIT REMOVAL M.0.7-13-88
zo
100254 BANANA BLUE PRINT $19198.61 BLUEPRINTING I3i
2' 100255 BANK OF AMERICA NTBSA S2 576.23 VISA CARDS, MEETING EXPENSES �z71
znl
22 101256 P.W. BAKOTTI AND ASSOC. S4t860.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P1-25,26,P2-32,33,37 291
23 m 100257 BARR DOOR OF SO.ORANGE CTY9INC S19314.`3 DOOR REPAIRS i„
24 >G 100256 B. BATTMAN S 5 7 5.0 G DEFERRED '-
L3 100259 BATTERIES WEST• INC. $623.45 TRUCK PARTS l3J1
zn
100260 BAXTER SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS 529072.37 LAB SUPPLIES �3;
27 100261 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES• INC. SBO.1G CAR WASH TICKETS 1,�
° -� 10C262 P08ERT 9EIN4WILLIAM FROST 6 AS S49600.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-33,34 '7
.29I 100263 BLOCK F COMPANY* INC. $25.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES .78_�
3O 100264 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE FFOCUCTS $1 267.6 OFFICE
3
2 ~ 100265 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE 1307.40 RADIATOR REPAIRS 1411
$197.40 TRUCK PARTS 1CO266 BON-A-RUES
UES 431
:33 100267 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC E 39 4 .441 •--
34 100268 BROWN 4 CALDWELL S5955C.00 LAB SERVICES +51
'33 100269 BROWN 8 CALDWELL CONSULTING $619377.47 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-1 I+„
3n 1OC270 PURKE ENGINEERING CO. $683.97 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES jai
137 1G0271 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES9 INC. S39192.03 SURVEYING SERVICES sol
3n 300272 GARY G. STREED S1r653.97 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
51;
36 CS COMFANY $19885.47 VALVES 521
+ol I0020273 4 CALTROL • INC. S2e232.77 . INSTRUMENT PARTS 31
41 10C275 CALIF. ASSOC. OF SANITATION $443.30 TRAINING :s41
ss1
42 1CO276 CCFITAL LESTWARD S96.1.86 MECANICAL SUPPLIES 1561
'43 IOC21f CARLETON ENGINEERS $29706.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19,P1-34-2 �57
I
14 100278 MOT/CASTLE $59514.19 LAB EQUIPMENT ;�,
- 100279 CENTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM S6 014.il4 PHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 6o1
16I 1CO280 CHAMPION FENCE CO. $817.90 FENCING '
+7 10e281 CHE-MWEST INDUSTRIES. INC. $599717.25 FERRIC CHLORIDE 11-09-88 ia31
° 100282 A.W. CHESTERTON - L.A. S5991�.88 PUMP PARTS i641
,91 100283 CHEVRON U.S.A.• INC. S524.25 PAINT SUPPLIES "31
1;
67.
100284 CHRISTTVE CORP. S19272.68 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS 6
1
It; '68.
_21 _i
531 i'7c
71
-41 172
»j s I741
=el
7 y
FUND NO 9159 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/14/89 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AF43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
1 CLAIMS PAID 06 21/89 POSTING DATE 06/21/89 1�
z'
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION „j
4
�a 100285 CORINNE CLAWSON $42.48 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 1
le 100286 COAST INSURANCE AGENCY S21327.00 INSURANCE sl
G . .S. o CO. 1 INC. $29776.55 MECHANICAL PARTS 01
e 1OC288 COMPRESSOR CCMFONENTS CF CALIF $11828050 MECHANICAL PARTS I1OI
�! 10028.9 COMPUSERVE $60.48 COMPUTER SERVICES 1
O 100290 ONDDR RUBBER R PACKING sl1192.50 RUBBER PRODUCTS
100291 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. $29094.45 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
.a
I1 1OC292 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $91.34 FREIGHT CHARGES le
i13 1OG293 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS $59785.70 BLUEPRINTING 17 '
41 100294 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $123.76 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR Ie1
1°1
a1 100295 COUNCIL ON EDUCATION S195.00 SEMINAR :o1
e l0^.296 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 511215.59 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES !
I17 1OC297 CAL WATER $20450 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
�le ICT298 LA RP
CURTI TRUCK 8 EGUIFMENT $249320:00 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.O. 4-13-88 2+1
�19 100299 DANIELS T R S RVICE $11J97.99 TIRES =3)
'20 100300 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $2146.00 LAB SUPPLIES 1:7. i
21 100301 DE7URIK AND/OR CS CO. $99255.07 VALVE PARTS !oni
'y22 190302 DIATEC POLYMERS S31JO0.49 ANIONIC POLYMERS M.0.8-10-88 '!
'23 rn 100303 DICKSONS $941.28 HARDWARE
24 >G 100304 DIFILIPPO ASSCCIATES $887.75 PRINTING I21
3 = 100305 DORADO ENTERPRISES9 INC. S49514.G6 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS
100306 DUNN EDWARDS CORP- 591651.14 PAINT SUPPLIES
7 100307 OUR-RED PRODUCTS $119.87 BUILDING SUPPLIES »I
'29 -{ 100308 ENS RESCURCES. INC. 311263.44 CONSULTING SERVICES - REG. 6 LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS301
29 100309 EASTMAN, INC. $624.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES I
!30 100310 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $67.C5 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS I+o!
7, 1OC311 ECOANALYSIS. INC. S11251.25 CONSULTING SERVICES - OCEAN MONITORING 41:
U rJ 100312 EFFECTIVE VISUAL IMAGERY 1273.48 PRESENTATION AIDS i.31
33 1OC31' EDWARD L. ELLIOT, JR. $11190.CO ENGINEERIGNS SERVICES �441
34 1CC314 ENA6LE $80.03 PUBLICATION I+91
'33 1OC315 FACTOPY REPRESENTATIVE. INC. $686.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS `4a
.7i
Je 100316 MARSHALL FAIRP.ES $340.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTIRBUTION .31
37 100317 JAMES FALCONER $19100.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - SCAQMD PERMITS 1491
3e 100318 JOHN B. FALKENSTEIN P.E. $39185.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4.J-20 so.
it.
�3%1 100319 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. S101,75 AIR FREIGHT 'ezl
+O 100320 FIBER GLASS STRUCTURAL ENGR. S21P831.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3e4l
61 100321 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $19783.57 FILTER I
SS
+el
!a2 100322 FISCHER B PORTER CO. $79673.38 CHLORINATION PARTS
+3 1DD323 FLAT B VERTICAL CCNCRETE S323.00 CONCRETE CUTTING 37
44 100324 FLO-SYSTEMS $19476.87 PUMP PARTS "e
331
J° IOC325 FOGOMAKER. INC. $129.JG PERMIT REFUND !aol
gel 100326 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $130.75 FILM 1z
J7 100327 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $296.75 PERMITS
+e� 100328 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 521347.31 PAINT SUPPLIES „1
+• 100329 DONALD L. FOX E ASSOCIATES S11825.00 SAFETY CONSULTING
'3U 100330 FOx8OR0 CO. / M4G SYSTEMS $29278.51 INSTRUMENT E'
7
sl !ral
szl .�I
53 '
34 1
as 731
:e I74
7`1
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/14/85 PAGE 3
E REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06/21/89 POSTING DATE 06/21/89
2
3 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
1.5 100331 FROST ENGINEERING SERVICES CO. b131.78 VALVES
10"332 CITY OF FULLERTON 5132.71 WATER
7 1OG333 G.M.A.C. AND/OR S1J9620.43 VEHICLE PARTS
° 100334 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 55o854.88 TELEPHONE
° 100335 DON GREEK 8 ASSOCIATES $460.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 88-72
10 100336 HADCC INSTRLMENTS $183.63 GAUGE
11 100337 HANEY 8 ASSCC. $lil76.6C MECHANCIAL REPAIRS
13 10033b HARBOUR ENGINEERING $79147.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
T3 00339 CHARLES G. HARDY. INC. $111.30 BUILDING MATERIALS
14 10634P FRED A. HARPER $10450.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION I
15 100341 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $874.47 PUMP '
1C 1OC342 MATCH B KIRK. INC. $518.53 ENGINE PARTS
17 100343 HEWLETT-PACKAPD $466.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS
1B 110344 HIGh VOLTAGE ELECTRIC $2 530.06 GENERATORS
19 100345 HILTI. INC. S998.52 TOOL
20 100346 HOERBIGER C.V.S. CALIF. . INC. S741.38 COMPRESSOR PARTS
21 100347 HOLTRACHEM WEST* INC. $109549.78 CAUSTIC SODA
22 100348 DONALD D. HONOMICHL 1301I.:u DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
23 IOC349 HOUSE OF EATTERIES $19695.05 BATTERIES
2. FTI 100353 R.S. HUGHES CO.. INC. $59037.29 PAINT SUPPLIES '1
29 = 100351 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $13.60 WATER USEAGE
2a -, 100352 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STMMF $118.19 RUBBER STAMPS
27w 100353 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN CYCL S80.C3 BIKE PARTS ,
25 1--1 100354 INGUSTRIAL THREADED PROCUCTS $19683.37 FITTINGS
• 29 --- 100355 INFILCO DEGREMONT. INC. $224.64 FREIGHT
30 190356 INGRAM PAPER 519229.60 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
31 100357 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $19142.90 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
32 W 100358 1N PLACE MACHINING CO. S59093.CG MACHINE SHAFT
33 100359 INTERNATIONAL 8USINESS MACHINE S58.04 PRINTER SUPPLIES `
34 100360 IRVINE RANCH WATER CISTRICI $20.53 WATER USEAGE
35 100361 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $583.75 METERS
35 100362 JENSEN TOOLS 8 ALLOYS $110.24 TOOL
J7 100363 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $68.80 ELECTRIC PARTS
35 100364 KAMAN BEARINGS d SUPPLY $667.79 FITTINGS
39 100365 KANER COMPANY S1.253.68 TOOLS
.0 100366 KAY-RAYS INC. S1!517.44 INSTRUMENTS
.1 1OC367 KEENAN SUPPLY S94.02 REPAIR KIT
42 IM0368 KrYSTONC VALVE $1035.3R VALVE
43 100369 KIMSTOCK INC. 16739750.00 VOC CREDITS M.O.5-10-89
3. 1110370 KING BEARING. INC. S843.71 MACHINE SUPPLIES
.5 1OC371 DONALD E. KINNEY $815.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
.5 100372 KIRST PUMP 8 MACHINE WORKS $29742.02 PUMP PARTS
47 100'_77 EASTMAN KODAK CO. $57.19 LAB SUPPLIES
,B 100374 MARTIN KORDICK, SP S852.4J CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5-29 5-31
.° 100375 L.B.W.S.. INC. S109.49 WELDING SUPPLIES
50 100376 LASER SUPPLIES B SERVICE $243.58 PRINT SUPPLIES
51
52
53
5.
55,
55
7
i
i
1
I
FUND NO 915; - JT GIST WGFKIND CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/14/89 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OPANCE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID U6/21/89 POSTING DATE C6/21/89
_ 1
31
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
4
11 100377 LE ROY CRANCALL B ASSOC. $682.71 CONSULTING SERVICES
100376 LIEBERT* CASSIDY 8 FRIERSON 5196a0.G0 SEMINAR REGISTRATION
7 100379 LIMITORGUE CORP. 840719.61 VALVE REPAIRS
6 10038C. K.P. LINOSTROMr INC. $139497.27 CONSULTING SERVICES - MASTER PLAN
a 1OC381 MS DATA SERVICL CORP. E84.80LAB SUPPLIES
10 1OL382 MACOMCO S1J9.80
100383 MAGNUS MOBILITY .SYSTEMS $336.34 SERVICE AGREEMENT
I TOOL
12 100tP,4 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTSO INC. $2 436.04 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
83 100385 MALCOLM PIR NIE 0 INC. 829881.45 ENGINEERING SERVICES
�< 100386 MAkVAC ELECTRONICS $142.73 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
100387 MATT - CMLOPO INC. S2 952.49 CHLORINATION PARTS
I 1! 100388 MCKENNA ENGR. 8 EGUIF. $59454.12 PUMP PARTS
1OC389 MERCHANTS 8 MANUFACTUR`RS $600.03 MEMBERSHIP DUES
�� 10039P HTCROAGE COMPUTER. S943.40 SOFTWARE
191 100391 MIDLAND MFG. CORP. $436.12 CHLORINATION PARTS
. 20
106392 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO. $629.43 SAFETY SUPPLIES
it 100393 MOORE 8 TABER S49706.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES
2= 100394 MOTION INDUSTRIES* INC. S217.46 BEARINGS
23 lIC395 MOTOROLA* INC. S230e4.98 PAGERS
24 Im 100396 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES $79.54 CELLULAR SERVICES
=� IOD397 NEAL SUPPLY CO. b1r117.83 FITTINGS
I 20� 10J398 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACh $4.93 WATER USEAGE
_' 100399 NORTHWEST MOTOR WELDIPIG* INC. S51550.00 ENGINE PART
28 t-y 10040G OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $406.34 SAFETY GLASSES
. 29 1OC401 NOT. INST. OF STANDARDS $196.01 LAB SUPPLIES
i
30 10:402 OLYMPIC CHEMICAL CO. $49 934.65 CHLORINE M.0.10-12-88
I 71 1 100403 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPLY S170.66 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
12� 100404 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO• $972.20 CHEMICALS
33 100405 OXYGEN SERVICE $ 74. 7 SPECIALTY GASES
34 111416 COUNTY SANITATION DISTPICT S83.52 EMPLOYEE HEALTH PLAN CONTRIBUTION
37 100407 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $99493.49 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
36 1Q040A PSSI S1r653.90 SEWER VIDEOS
37 100409 PACG PUMPS S40504.80 PUMP PARTS
3a 100410 PACIFIC SAFETY EGUIP.MENT CO. $298.81 SAFETY SUPPLIES
39 100411 PACIFIC BELL $14.53 TELEPHONE
i 40 100412 PACTEL CELLULAR $93.76 CELLULAR SERVICES
41 100413 FOUL FAFANEK S300.9J PEER REVIEW - TOXICS EPIDEMOLOGY PROGRAM
42 103414 ASR ANALYSIS ANG/6R $911.0� PUMP ANALYSIS
43100415 ARK R 8 SON PUP.LICATIONS. INC $422.41 PUBLICATION
u 100416 FARTS ENGINEERING COMPANY $29609.69 COMPRESSOR PARTS
45 100417 PARTS UNLIMITED $535.44 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
.e 10041F PEACHPIT FRESS $26.95 PUBLICATION
47 106419 FEAT* 'MARWICK* PAIN 8 CO. S5ra0a.00 AUDITING SERVICES
4a 1GO420 ROY FENDERGRAFT S 4 4 0.U 0 DEFERRED COMP DISTIBUTION
40 1OC421 PENHALL COMPANY $605.30 CORE DRILLING
IOU422 PHOTO B SOUND CO. $10920.29 COMPUTER SUPPLIES/EQUIPMENT
1 71
33
1 5.
30
56
FUND NO 9199 - JT LIST WORK114G CAPITAL FROCESSING DATE 6/14/89 PAGE 5
L REPORT NUMBER. AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
' CLAIMS PAID 06/21/89 POSTING DATE 06/21/69
2
3 WARRANT NO. VENGOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
.
IOC:422 PICKWICK PAPER $19�13.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES
6 10G424 F1MA GRO SYSTEMS* INC. $449465.45 SLUDGE REMOVAL M.O.5-11-88
100425 FOLYPURE• INC. i22r685.79 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-8-89
° 100426 THE PROJECTS SOLUTION CO. 53t950.GO INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.8-10-88
° 1OP427 PULSAFEEDER S19453.38 PUMP PARTS
'0 101428 PUMP ENGINEERING CO. $94.13 PUMP PARTS
1 100429 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. 1744.56 TRASH REMOVAL
12 1OC430 RECYC• INC. $669880.0( SLUDGE REMOVAL M.0.5-11-88
13 100431 RED VALVE CO.. INC. S49555.88 VALVE PARTS
14 100432 R.A. REED ELECTRIC S2047.00 ELECTRIC REPAIRS
116 100433 REMEDY TEMP $579.09 TEMPORARY SERVICES
16 100434 REMOTE 14ETER RESETTING SYSTEM S39a00.00 POSTAGE
105435 THE REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO. S277.22 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
10 IOC416 RENOLD POWER TRANSMISSION $5 o00.CC MECHANICAL REPAIRS
° 10'0437 RICHARDS% WATSON B GERSHON $17t402.62 LEGAL SERVICES 4-8-87
1OG438 RICOH CORPORATION $69.37 COPIER LEASES
_' 100439 RICHARD ROLFE $292.24 MEETING EXPENSE
22 100440 ROSEMONT ANALYTICAL $1 015.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
1OC4111 POSEMOUNT/UNILOC $298.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
H-4m 100442 JOSEPH T. RYERSON B SON. IP-C. $229.47 STEEL
SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. $265.60 PARTS CLEANER
= 1OC444 SANCON ENGINEERING 9 INC. $960.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
27 100445 SARGENT-WELCH SCIENTIFIC CC. S131.04 LAB SUPPLIES
26 �-•{ 100446 SCIENCE APPLICATICNS TNT4L S1119683.86 OCEAN SAMPLING M.O.8-10-88
29 -I 100447 SEA. COAST DESIGNS 1319.1"u OFFICE FURNITURE
36 100448 SEA-ILAN $4 615.00 LAB EQUIPMENT _
31 100449 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $108.50 WATER USEAGE
72 lJl 100450 SEWER EQUIP. CO. OF AMERICA $19192.96 TOOLS
33 100451 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $174.28 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES -
' 100452 SOIL AND TESTING ENGINEERS S616.00 SOIL TESTING
30 100453 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY $250.00 VIOLATION FEE
36 106454 HUGE SOULAGES T123,C0 MEETING EXPENSE
37 1C0455 SOUTH COAST DODGE S19.77 AUTOMOBILE PARTS
30 100456 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. $376018.15 POWER
39 100457 SO. CAL. GAS CC. $ 38? 4 NATURAL GAS
40 100458 SOUTHERN COUNTIES CIL CO. $10%349.27 DIESEL FUEL
41 100459 SPEC TECH WESTEPN S19203.4Z WELDING SUPPLIES
43 100460 SPECIAL FLASTIC SYSTEMS, `JC. S65,77 TUBING
43 1OL461 STARBUCK TRUCK REFINISHING S3t175.00 SAND BLASTING
+' 100462 STAR TOOL 8 SUPPLY CO. S2 018.52 TOOLS
65 100463 SUBIAl INC. 1530., C VISUAL SUPPORT SERVICES
40 10C46.4 SUMMIT STEEL 374.69 STEEL
47 100465 SUPELCO9 INC. E254.55 LAB SUPPLIES
J6 1CC466 SUPERIOR SWEEPING SOUTH 1225.00 STREET SWEEPING
40 100467 THE SUPFLIEPS $4t654.69 HARDWARE
50i 100460 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. 1106.85 TOOLS
51
32
33
6.
36
36
7
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAFIT4L PROCESSING DATE 6/14/85 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID C6/21/85 POSTING DATE 06/21189
�2
3 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
4
100469 TAK TAKAMINL $4,570,CL CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING
° IOC470 TAYLOR-DUNN $633.20 CART PARTS
7 100471 TECHNICAL PRODUCTS 8 CTRLS $954.PC INSTRUMENT PARTS
6 100472 TEKMAR COMPANY $467.43 LAB SUPPLIES
0 100473 THERMO ANALYTICAL9 INC./NOOCAL $72.00 LAB SERVICES
10 10C474 THOMAS TEMPORARIES 5376..'0 TEMPORARY SERVICES
11 100475 THOMASON MECHANICAL CORP. 119736.25 MECHANICAL PARTS
12 1OP476 TORRANCE LOSS CONTROL4CORP. 5895.OP SAFETY SUPPLIES
1 00477 OWNE ADVERTISERS $87.11 MAILING SERVICES
14 1OC478 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE• INC. $165.89 AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES
1e 1G0479 TRAVEL TRAVEL 1988.00 TRAVEL SERVICES
IC 10C460 T.S. TRIPP $490.00 WINDOW CLEANING
17 1OC481 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPFLY. INC. $810.97 TRUCK PARTS
le 100422 J.G. TUCKER 8 SON9 INC. $675.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS
IQ 1C0483 THE REGENTS OF THE $50.00 PUBLICATION
20 100484 U.S. AUTO GLASS CENTERvINC. $138.43 TRUCK PARTS
21 100485 UNOCAL $263.02 UNLEADED GASOLINE
22 100486 THE UNISOURCE CORP. $89170.59 PAPER
23 100487 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $119.2u PARCEL SERVICES
24 rn 10C4P8 UNITED WESTERN ELEVATOR 5319.75 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
2] = 1C04P9 VWR SCIENTIFIC $482.27 LAB SUPPLIES
2e 1OC490 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $62268.15 VALVE PARTS
27 10(491 VARIAN INSTRUMENT GROUP $ 464.23 LAB SUPPLIES
2e IOC492 VEHICLE SPRING SERVIC`_ S21I.30 TRUCK PARTS
2Y 1 P C 4 9 3 VERTEX SYSTEMS S19303.06 COMPUTER PROGRAM MAINTENANCE
30 100494 VIKING INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 5840.42 PAINT SUPPLIES
311 1 200495 RICHARD W. VON LANGEN $343.64 MEETING EXPENSE
32 CT) 100496 JOHN R. WAPLES $537.80 ODOR CONTROL CONSULTANT
33 100497 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICE S29339.10. GUARD SERVICES
34 100498 WESTERN STATE CHEMICAL SUFFLY S539027.02 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-10-88
33 100499 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $588.25 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
3e I005C0 WESTRUY INTERNATIONAL $124.59 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
37 100501 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES $249318.38 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-26-2,2-26-3.2-27,2-28
39 100502 R OURKE 8 WOODRUFF $432139.52 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.10-14-87
39 1011503 XEROX CORP. 119060.00 COPIER LEASES/SUPPLIES
40 IOf502F _`IPPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. S64.fC LAB SERVICES
I41 lOC!�05 RICHARD YOUNG PROD. S1s299.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES
42 -------- -- ----
43
44 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID "6/21/89 $291699447.60
.] -----------------
4e
37
4e
491
]OI
I
]2
]4
1 _]
n
mwrnouu�unueiinmio iii wiinu�i�nim14i4ini �lrr �nuuunuwei.wni.,wl.w
�unmu rne irn�,w;rrr
FUND NO 9199 — JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 06/14/89 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
L1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 06 21 89 POSTING DATE 06 2l 89
',2
3'
I4 SUMMARY AMOUNT
a
° 111 OPER FUND 73.66
7 62 OPER FUND 3,762.33
�° /2 ACO FUND 84.00
16 #2 F/R FUND 32 118.88
10 03 OPER FUND 25,209.11
" U3 ACO FUND 228.00
12 5 OPER FUND
;13 /5 F/R FUND 3,538.37
.14 b OPER FUND 1,889.24
° #6 ACO FUND 852.00
°i 06 F/R FUND 129.00
17 Fill6.181.82
10 B11 OPER FUND 6 456.97
t° 14 OPER FUND 20.53
2J /14 AGO FUND 888.00
=' 05S6 OPER FUND I r 1,336.60
22 9566 ACO FUND 6,954.65
'27 7614 OPER FUND 240.00
24f� TJT OPER FUND 1 11.047.099.77
23j CORF 842,081.28
Z
2° —, SELF FUNDED WORKERS COMP INSURANCE FUND 11,161.01
I27 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL UND 175,031.33
28 F y
i
2G
30
31
J21v APHUIID BY DTSIIUCIS 5 & it $2,097,771.03
3 i.
341
]3
]°
37
3°
I301
40
♦1
42
431
44
4]
4°
q
4°
4Y
SUI
1a 1
52
i33
34
I5'
t5e
I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned
regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 1 are a
true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the
additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be
regarded as surplusage.
Chairman
Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County, California
Secretary, Bo rd of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County, California
I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned
regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 2 are a
true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the
additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be
regarded as surplusage.
i rman pro tom
Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 2
of Orange County, California
Secretary, Boa d of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 2
of Orange County, California
I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned
regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 3 are a
true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the
additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be
regarded as surplusage.
Chai an
Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 3
of Orange County, California
Secretary, Bo rd of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 3
of Orange County, California
I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned
regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 5 are a
true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the
additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be
regarded as surplusage.
Ch irm n
Bo rd f Directors of County
Sanita ion District No. 5
of Oran a County, California
Sectetary, Boar of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California
I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned
regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 6 are a
true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the
additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be
regarded as surplusage.
Ch rof
B irectors of County
n District No. 6
of County, California
Secretary, Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6
of Orange County, California
I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned
regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 7 are a
true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the
additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be
regarded as surplusage.
Chairman
Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County, California
Secretary, Boa d�of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County, California
I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned
regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 11 are a
true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the
additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be
regarded as surplusage.
a
C i rman
Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 11
of Orange County, California
Secretary, BoarV of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 11
of Orange County, California
•
•
i
I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned
regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 13 are a
true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the
additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be
regarded as surplusage.
Chaff rtnafn
Board of Direc rs of County
Sanitation District No. 13
of Orange County, California
Secretary, Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 13
of Orange County, California
I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned
regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,
California, on July 19, 1989, reporting the actions of District No. 14 are a
true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the
additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be
regarded as surplusage.
Chairman
Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 14
of Orange County, California
Secretary, Boart of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 14
of Orange County, California
•
•
h
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954 . 2,
I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Adjourned Regular Board
Meeting of Districts Nos . 1 , 2, 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 11 , 13 and 14 held
on t. 19 R9 was duly posted for public inspection
at the main lobby of the Districts ' offices on ,
19-.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this —d�
day of , 19 .
Rita J. Brow , Secretary of
each of the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos . 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 11 , 13 &
14 of Orange County, California