HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1988-05-05COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS.6,7.&14
OF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
May 5,1988 -7:30 p.m.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,California
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of April 13,1988,the Boards of
Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.6,7 and 14 of Orange County,
California,met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.The roll was called and the
Secretary reported a quorum present.
DISTRICT 6
DIRECTORS PRESENT:James A.Wahner,Chairman,Philip
Maurer and Don R.Roth
DIRECTORS ABSENT:None
DISTRICT 7
DIRECTORS PRESENT:Richard B.Edgar,Chairman,Dan
Griset,Don R.Roth,Don E.Smith and
James A.Wahner
DIRECTORS ABSENT:John C.Cox,Jr.and Sally Anne Miller
DISTRICT 14
DIRECTORS PRESENT:Peer A.Swan,Chairman pro tern,Ursula
Kennedy,Don R.Roth and Don E.Smith
DIRECTORS ABSENT:Sally Anne Miller
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT J.Wayne Sylvester,General Manager,
Rita J.Brown,Secretary,Thomas M.
Dawes,Gary G.Streed and W.N.Clarke
OTHERS PRESENT None
******************
Report of consultant re joint The Chair recognized Mr.Conrad Hohener
sewage conveyance facilities to from Boyle Engineering Corporation,and
serve Districts Nos.6,7 and 14 his associate Mr.Philip Stone,Districts’
consultants engaged to prepare a project
report to select alignment,determine size and prepare cost estimates for joint
sewage conveyance facilities to serve portions of District 7,the north half of
District 6 and District 14.Mr.Hohener reported that the project report
recently provided to the Directors was a culmination of several investigations,
project reports and studies since 1983.
05/05/88 ~~~
Districts 6,7 &14 •~
.‘p.~
Originally,the firm had been engaged to do a preliminary study for District
7 and the north half of District 6~The work was suspended when it became
evident that the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD)was going to request
formation of a new Sanitation District to serve the Irvine area and join the
Joint Administrative Organization~,District 14 was ultimately formed and
the Main Street Trunk Sewer,Von Karman Trunk Sewer and Main Street Pump
StatiOn were all sized to provide for the future flows of Districts Nos0 7
and 14~Flows have been transported through an interim connection to the
Sunflower Interceptor Sewer0
He advised that the project report was basically completed last year;
however,before it was presented to the Boards,they were directed to
address a request from IRWD to upsize the Baker—Gisler Interceptor Sewer
line~The “Revised”Project Report includes the upsizing and was prepared
in cooperation with,and has been circulated to,the City of Costa Mesa,the
Costa Mesa Sanitary District,the City of Irvine,the Irvine Ranch Water
District and the County of Orange0 Three major alternative routes were
considered and 27 subcombinations were studied before all of the agencies
arrived at a consensus relative to the alignment0
The proposed project includes the construction of force main sewers and
gravity trunk sewers from the Main Street Pump Station,located on the north
side of Main Street within the John Wayne Airport “Clear Zone”to
Reclamation Plant No0 1 in Fountain Valley0 The recommended sewer
facilities include an 84—inch to 78—inch trunk sewer from Reclamation Plant
No0 1 to Bristol Street in the City of Costa Mesa,sized for a peak flow of
up to 103 million gallons per day;and dual Baker Street Force Mains,sized
for a peak flow of 77 million gallons per day,extending from Baker Street
at Bristol Street to the Main Street Pump Station0
The Baker—Gisler Interceptor Sewer,Contract No0 14—1—1,would be
constructed jointly by Districts Nos.6,7 and 14;the Baker Street Force
Mains,Contract No0 14-1—2,by Districts Nos.7 and 14.The double-barrel
force main is proposed for the Baker Street Force Mains to maintain maximum
flexibility,allowing one barrel to be in use in the early years of the
project life to keep the velocities as high as possible,with the second
barrel as backup0 In later years,both barrels would be used to reduce
pumping energy costs0 In the event of an outage of one of the barrels,the
second barrel would provide the reliability necessary during repairs0 Two
42—inch diameter pipe barrels are recommended for the dual force main
system0
The Project Report also includes the District No0 6 parallel Fairview Relief
Interceptor Sewer between Baker Street and Wilson Street to relieve the
current facilities which are flowing at capacity.Initially,only the
portion between Baker Street and the south side of the Paularino Flood
Control Channel,a distance of about 800 feet,will be constructed.
Mr.Stone further reviewed current and future capacity requirements of each
District and gave a detailed explanation of the methodology used in
determining the recommended capacity allocations.It was agreed that the
Districts should continue their current policy of upsizing facilities,
whenever possible,to allow for future capacity requirements.
-2-
~O5/05/88
Districts 6,7 &14
It was pointed out that the agreement relative to formation of County Sanitation
District No.14 provided that the construction of the joint conveyance facilities
to service Districts Nos.6,7.and 14 be completed by 1990.Mr.Hohener
commented that he believed this was an ambitious schedule but could be adhered to
if the Boards moved forward with this program as soon as possible.
The consultants then reviewed the total project cost for construction of the
Baker—Gisler Interceptor Sewer,the Baker Street Force Mains and the Fairview
Relief Interceptor Sewer,which is estimated to be $24,410,000.The costs are
allocated to the benefiting Districts,based on pro—rata capacity requirements
(including the upsizing requested by IRWO),as follows:
CSO No.6 $3,680,000
CSD No.7 5,050,000
CSD No.14 15,680,000
Total $24,410,000
The Directors then entered into a discussion of the cost allocations.It was
pointed out that the calculations,on a pro—rata basis in accordance with the
Boards historical policy,and as provided in the District 14 formation agreement,
reduces the cost per unit of capacity (mgd)for all participating Districts;
decreases the total cost for Districts 6 and 7;but increases the total cost to
District No.14 because of the allocation of all of the additional capacity to
District 14 in response to the IRWD request for upsizing.
IRWD requests that the upsizing costs be allocated to District 14 on an
incremental basis rather than a pro—rata basis.Under this formula District 14
would pay only the incremental cost of upsizing the facilities.Thus Districts 6
and 7 would pay a higher cost per unit of capacity (mgd)than District No.14 but
the same total cost calculated before the upsizing;and District 14 would pay a
lower cost per unit of capacity and a lower total cost for the upsizing compared
to the pro—rata method.Following further discussion,it was the consensus of
the Directors that the cost allocation method would be reviewed by the Directors
at a later date prior to a final determination on cost—sharing for these
projects.
The Directors also discussed the pump station capacities,the Von Karman and Main
Street sewer capacities and the possibility of increasing the size of one or both
of the Baker Street parallel force mains.The consultant advised that based on
their studies,they recommended the two 42—inch lines and still felt that would
best meet the Districts’needs.Increasing the size of one or both of the force
mains may lead to operational problems.
Approving Project Report for Joint Moved,seconded and duly carried:
Sewage Conveyance Facilities to
Serve Districts Nos.6,7 and 14 That the Project Report for Joint Sewage
Conveyance Facilities to Serve Districts
Nos.6,7 and 14,Contract No.14-I,dated April 1988,prepared by Boyle
Engineering Corporation,be,and is hereby,received,ordered filed and approved,
subject to further review of the method of allocating facilities’costs to
the participating Districts.
—3-
1J
05/05/88
Districts 6,7 &14
0
Authorizing the Selection Committee Moved,seconded and duly carried:
to negotiate Addendum No.1 to the
agreement with Boyle Engineering That the Selection Committee be,and is
Corporation for preparation of hereby,authorized to solicit a proposalProjectReportforJointSewageandnegotiateAddendumNo.1 to the
Conveyance Facilities,to provide Professional Services Agreement with
for design of Contract Nos.14—1—1 Boyle Engineering Corporation for
and 14—1—2 preparation of Project Report for
Joint Sewage Conveyance Facilities to
Serve Districts Nos.6,7 and 14,for additional services to design the
Baker—Gisler Interceptor Sewer,Contract No.14—1-1,and Baker Street Force Mains,Contract No.14—1—2,
Director Don R.Roth requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
Ad.iournment Moved,seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos.6,.7 and 14 be adjourned.The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:22 p.m.,May 5,1988.
0
Secretary,Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts Nos.6,
7 and 14 of Orange County,California
0
-4-
I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned
regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts Nos.6,7 and 14 of Orange
County,California,on May 5,1988,reporting the actions of District No.6
are a true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the
additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be
regarded as surplusage.
Secretary,Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No.6
of Orange County,California
rman
~d of Directors of County
tation District No.6
of Orange County,California
I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned
regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts Nos.6,7 and 14 of Orange
County,California,on May 5,1988,reporting the actions of District No.7
are a true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the
additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be
regarded as surplusage.
Chal rman
Board of Directors of Coun
Sanitation District No.7
of Orange County,California
Secretary,Boar’~of Directors of
County Sanitation District No.7
of Orange County,California
I certify that those portions of the minutes of the combined adjourned
regular meeting of the County Sanitation Districts Nos.6,7 and 14 of Orange
County,California,on May 5,1988,reporting the actions of District No.14
are a true and correct report of the minutes of said District and that the
additional matter reported showing the actions of the other Districts shall be
regarded as surplusage.
thai rma
Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No.14
of Orange County,California
Secretary,Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No.14
of Orange County,California
/4
•S
S
S
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2,
I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Adjourned Regular Board
Meeting of DistrictsNo3.~,’~-.Iqield on S ,19~was
duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the
District’s offices on ________________,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand this
_____
day of ~,1
Rita J.Brown,Secretary of the
Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District~NoS.~
of Orange County,California
I
.
S