HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1981-04-134
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.5
OF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
April 13,1981 -5:30 p.m
Newport Beach City Hall Annex
3330 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach,California
Pursuant to the adjournment of the regular meeting of April 8,1981,the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.5 of Orange County,California
met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date,at the Newport
Beach City Hall Annex.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.The roll was called
and the Secretary reported a quorum present..
DIRECTORS PRESENT:Jacqueline Heather (Chairman),John Cox,Jr.
and Thomas Riley
DIRECTORS ABSENT:None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:Fred A.Harper,General Manager,J.Wayne
Sylvester,Secretary,Rita Brown,Hilary
Baker and Tom Dawes
OTHERS PRESENT:Thomas L.Woodruff,General Counsel,Joe
Devlin,Dave Dmohowski,Charlie Jencks,
Steve Nelson,Tom Nielsen,Allan Tebbetts
and Carl Wilcox
****************
Report of EDAW,Inc.Steve Nelson of EDAW,Inc.,District’s
District’s consultant consultant,briefly reviewed the oral comments
on comments received on received at the March 30th public hearing on
Final Supplemental EIR the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
re Enhancement Program re Enhancement Program for the Big Canyon
for Big Canyon Drainage Drainage Area.He also reported that addi
Area tional written comments had been received
from the California Department of Fish and
Game and the Orange County Environmental Management Agency subsequent to the
hearing.Mr.Nelson then categorized the various types of comments received
and summarized the responses thereto which have been incorporated into the
final EIR.
Following a brief discussion,Allen Tebbetts,Special Counsel for the District,
stated that the restoration plan is in compliance with the conditions originally
established by the Coastal Commission and they are in agreement with the proposed
plan.
—————..-—.......-,.._..__.L ~.2.....1...~—
District 5 I
April 13,1981
.~
_________________________
It was moved,seconded and duly carried:
___________________________
That the written comments received from the
Department of Fish and Game,~Iated April 6,19
__________________________
and the Orange County Environmental Management
Agency,dated April 8,1981,~elative to the
Impact Report (EIR)re ~nhancement Program for
and are hereby,received and ordered filed.
Moved,seconded and du1~y carried:
___________________________
That the Final Supplemental Ervironmental
Impact Report re Enhandement F~rogram for
the Big Canyon Drainage’Area be,and is
FURTHER MOVED:That the Board of Directors hereby certif:
Final Supplemental EIR has been completed in compliance w~:District Guidelines Implementing the California Environmei
of 1970,as amended.
Approving agreement with It was moved,seconded ~nd duly carried:
State of California,Dept..
of Fish and Game,re Enhance That the Board of Directors h~reby adoptsmentProgramforBigCanyonResolutionNo.81-6O-5,~approving AgreementDrainageAreaRegardingProposedStre~.m or Lake Alteration
with the State of California,Department of
Fish and Game,in connection with the Enhancement Prograin~for ~Big CanyonDrainageArea(Big Canyon Marsh Restoration Project).A ¶~ertifi~ed copyofthisresolutionisattachedheretoandmadeapartoftheseminutes.
Discussion re agreement with The District’s General ~ounse1 reported onTheIrvineCompanyretheagreemententeredilltowithTheIrvine
construction of the Back Bay Company in 1976 re advance payment of connection
Trunk Sewer fees in order to constn~ict the~Back Bay Trunk
Sewer to serve properties owned by The Irvine
Company.Mr.Woodruff pointed out that due to the current finan~ial status of
the District,the payment provisions of the 1976 agreement need ~o be revised.
He indicated that negotiations with The Irvine Company relative to preparationandapprovalofanewagreementhadbeenunderwayforsoi~e time~but,.as yet,
no new agreement had been executed and that The Irvine Co9ipany recentlyindicatedthattheywouldprefertocontinuewiththeexistinga~reement.
Mr.Woodruff stressed the importance of resolving the repayment issue prior
to advertising for bids for construction of said project.
Receive and file written
comments re Draft Supple
mental EIR re Enhancement
Program for Big Canyon
Drainage Area
Draft Supplemental Environmental
the Big Canyon Drainage Area be,
Receive,file and approve
Final Supplemental EIR re
Enhancement Program for the
Big Canyon Drainage Area
hereby,received,ordered filed and approved;and,
Les th~
ith thE
ital Q~
.t said
State and
ality Act
Following a lengthy discussion relative to the provisions
agreement and proposed changes to be included in a new ag:
Irvine Company,Tom Nielsen,representing The Irvine Comp~
pos~.tion relative to repayment of the loan and assured th~
necessary terms and conditions could be worked out to the
prior to award of a contract for the Back Bay Trunk Sewer,
to proceed.
of the
eement
ny,coi
Board
Distri
to enal
current
with The
rimented on their
that the
:t’s satisfaction,
)le the project
0
Jistrict ~
April 13,1981
~‘Ap~roving plans and Following a brief report by the Deputy Chief
specifications for Engineer on the bidding procedure to be followed,
Contract No.5-24 it was moved,seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No.81-58-5,approving plans
and specifications for Back Bay Trunk Sewer,from Newport Dunes to Jamboree
Pump Station,Contract No.5-24,and authorizing the General Manager to establish
the date for receipt of bids.A certified copy of this resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
Approving plans and Moved,seconded and duly carried:
specifications for
Contract No.5-24-1 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts
Resolution No.81-59-5,approving plans and
specifications for Enhancement Program for the Big Canyon Drainage Area (Big
Canyon Marsh Restoration Project),Contract No.5-24-1,and authorizing the
General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids.A certified copy
of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
Discussion re implementation Following a staff review of the required
of user charges procedures and actions necessary to establish
a user fee and collect said fee on the annual
property tax bill,the Board entered into a discussion of the alternative time
tables for implementation of such a fee.
It was then moved,seconded and duly carried:
That Alternative A,to implement user fees to be collected on the property.
tax bill beginning with the 1981-82 fiscal year be adopted;and,
FURThER MOVED:That the staff be directed to proceed with implementation
thereof.
Waiving provisions of Following a brief discussion of the need to
purchasing resolution expedite procurement of necessary materials,
re user fee program supplies and services to enable implementation
implementation of the user fee program in accordance with the
adopted timetable,it was moved,seconded and
duly carried:
That the provisions of District Purchasing Resolution No.81-24 be,and are
hereby,waived and that the staff be,and is hereby,authorized to procure
necessary materials,supplies and services to implement said user fee program.
Adjournment Moved,seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.5
be adjourned to 5:30 p.m.,April 29,1981,at Newport Beach City Hall Annex.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 6:25 p.m.,April 13,1981.
Chairman of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No.S
of Orange County,California
Secretary of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No.5
of Orange County,California