HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1979-11-14 BCOUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7
OF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA.
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING
November 14,1979 -6:00 P.N
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley,California
Pursuant to the call of the Chairman,the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County,California,met in a special meeting
at the above hour and date,in the Districts’Administrative Offices.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.The roll was called
and the Secretary reported a quorum present.
DIRECTORS PRESENT:Don Smith (Chairman),Bill Vardoulis,
Ralph Welsh and Harry Yamamoto
DIRECTORS ABSENT:Ray Williams,Francis Glockner and
Edison Miller
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:Fred A.Harper,General Manager,J.Wayne
Sylvester,Secretary,Ray B.Lewis and
William N.Clarke
OTHERS PRESENT:Thomas L.Woodruff,General Counsel,Rod
DuBois,Lavern Goodwin,Donald Hold,
Conrad Hohener,Frank Martinez,Dayne
Stiles,Phil Stone and Satoru Tamaribuchi
*************
Report and discussion re The General Manager briefly reviewed
Peters Canyon Study the purpose of the Peters Canyon Study
prepared by Boyle Engineering on the
feasibility of serving the Peters Canyon area easterly of the present
District No.7 boundary.The study,which was requested and paid for by
the Irvine Company,was completed in March and has been distributed to
interested parties for comment.
Mr.Conrad Hohener of Boyle Engineering then summarized the Peters Canyon
Study and its relationship to the District’s 1969 Master Plan of Sewers.
The report assesses the capacity of the District’s facilities and the
capability of handling sewage generated from the 4100 acre Peters Canyon
Study area of which 700 acres were included in the District’s Master Plan.
Mr.Hohener reviewed the criteria used in projecting new facilities or
existing facility modifications necessary to serve the area and the
estimated costs as follows:
Peters Canyon Trunk $3,497,800
Orange Park Blvd.Parallel Trunk 39 600
(Tustin~.Orange Trunk Parallel)
Red Hill Ave.Parallel Trunk 504,000
Sunflower Ave.Parallel Trunk 985,500
——~———.—
District No.7
-.~.
11/14/79
Lift Station at Alton Ave.~Raitt St.-$20,000
Sub-Total -Parallel Trunks F~
Lift Station Only $1,549,100
Elimination of Existing Pump Stations 542.040
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $5,588,940
Preliminary engineering,design surveying,
design engineering,construction staking,
construction inspection,administration,
legal and miscellaneous @ 25%1,397,235
TOTAL COST $6,986,175
Mr.Hohener stated that the new plan would provide facilities to handle a
net additional flow of 5.6 MGD and eliminate nine existing 70th Sewer
Maintenance District pump stations.He also noted that the entire plan was
predicated on Jamboree Road being extended through the Marine Corps LTA base
because if the Peters Canyon Trunk is moved easterly,it would be virtually
impossible for the line to flow by gravity.
The Chief Engineer reported that after the report was completed,the Irvine
Company studied additional alternative plans.He briefly reviewed them and
recommended that the Board consider engaging Boyle Engineering to update the
Peters Canyon Study to assess the alternative of including the territory
easterly to Culver Drive.He also summarized the advantages and disadvantages
of annexing the Peters Canyon area as follows:
ADVANTAGES -Eliminates nine pump stations and ongoing M ~0
costs associated therewith for the property
owners served.
-Would establish the ultimate District Service
boundary.
DISADVANTAGES -Limited treatment plant capacity.No additional
capacity has been built since 1972 and the addi
tional capacity requires a new Headworks at Plant
No.1.
-Impact on application for secondary treatment
waiver.
-Requires Master Plan modifications.
The Chair then recognized Mr.Dayne Stiles,representing the Irvine Company,
who gave the Company’s current posture on the proposed annexation,endorsed
the Chief Engineer’s recommendation to update the study to include the area
easterly to Culver Drive and offered,on behalf of the Irvine Company,to
pay the cost of said work.CD
—2—
District 7
-~‘~ll/l4/79
FURTHER MOVED:That,upon receipt of written confirmation from The Irvine
Company to pay for said additional work,the staff be,and is hereby,
authorized to order the engineer to proceed with the update of the Peters
Canyon Study.
Receive and file letter from
The Irvine Company requesting
initiation of proceedings re
proposed Peters Canyon area
annexat ion
Receive and file Initial Study
and Environmental Impact
‘re proposed Peters
Canyon annexation
Finding proposed Peters Canyon
annexation will Wave a signifi
cant environmental impact and
declaring that an EIR must be
N prepared
Moved,seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby finds
the proposed Peters Canyon annexation will
have a significant environmental impact,
and;
FURTHER MOVED:That the Board of Directors hereby declares that an
Environmental Impact Report (.EIR}for the Peters Canyon annexation should
be prepared,and;
FURTHER MOVED:That a Notice of Preparation relative to said findings and
declaration be,and is hereby’,ordered filed in accordance with the District’s
guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act.
Authorizing preparation of
EIR re proposed Peters’
Canyon annexation
Peters Canyon annexation be,and
Authorizing staff to solicit
proposals fbr preparation of
Draft EIR re proposed Peters
Canyon annexation
That the staff be,and is hereby,auth
orized to solicit proposals for prepara
tion of a Draft Environmental Impact
Report (EIR)relative to the proposed Peters Canyon annexation.
Authorizing staff to negotiate Moved,seconded and duly carried:
amendment to agreement with
Boyle Engineering to update That the staff be,and is hereby,auth—
Peters Canyon annexation Study orized to negotiate an amendment to the
agreement with Boyle Engineering
Corporation for preparation of Peters Canyon Study to update said study to
include territory easterly to Culver Drive in the proposed Peters Canyon
annexation,for consideration by the Board;and,
Moved,seconded and duly carried:
___________________________
That the letter from the Irvine Company
-
dated November 5,1979,requesting initi
-ation of procedures to satisfy require
ments of CEQA re proposed Peters Canyon
area annexation,be,and is hereby,received and ordered filed.
Moved,seconded and duly carried:
______________________________
That the Initial Study and Environmental
-
‘Impact Assessment prepared by staff
relative to the proposed Peters Canyon
annexation be,and is hereby,recei’ved and ordered filed.
Moved,seconded and duly carried:
That preparation of Environmental Impact
Report (EIR)relative to the proposed
is hereby,authorized and ordered.
Moved,seconded and duly carried:
-3-
District 7
11/14/79
Adjournment Moved,seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No.7 be adjourned.The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned
at 7:25 p.m.,November 14,1979.
Chairman of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No.7
of Orange County,California
Secretary of the Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No.7
Orange County,California
-4-