HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1970-08-25•DISTRICT NO.5
MI~JTES OF THE ADJOURNED MEETING
•August 2~,1970 -4:30 p.m
lO~J4 El1isA~enue
Fountain Valley,California
.‘Th
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting held August 12,1970,
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.5,of
Orange County,California,met in an adjourned regular meeting at
the above hour and date.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at ~4.:3O p.m.The roll
was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present.
DISTRICT NO.5
Directors present:Llndsley Parsons (Chairman),
Edgar liirth and Alton E.Allen
Directors absent:None
OTHERS PRESENT Don Simpson,Jay Panchal,Joe
Devlin and Fritz Steppat
STAFF ~ERS PRESENT:Paul G.Brown,Norman Tremblay,
John Sigler,Georgia Crabb and
Fred A.Harper,Secretary pro tern
**************
Appointment of Moved,seconded and duly carried:
•1~~~Secretary pro tern
That Fred A.Harper be appointed
Secretary pro tern.
Discussion re:annexation At the July 14th special meeting
policy for the District of the Board,the staff was directed
to draft an annexation policy for
consideration by the Board.The Assistant General Manager
reported on progress to date on preparation of the annexation
policy and stated that the staff recommends a $310 annexation
fee based on the District’s per acre investment in facilities.
He further stated that the staff recommends that two provisions
should be included in the District’s policy which are not
included in Dist~icts Nos.2 and 7 pOlicies.These provisions
are:
1.That the area to be annexed will be required to
withdraw from any other sewering agency;
•2.That the annexation fee be recomputed annually
rather than escalate the annexation fee based on
a construction cost index.
Chairman Parsons asked for clarification as to the District’s
current policy regarding giving credit on District’s annexation
fee for funds paid to another sewering agency for equity in their
sewerage facilities.The General Manager reported that credit for
equity in other sewering agencies facilities has not been given
in the past.It was then moved,seconded and duly carried:
~That the Board of Directors adopt in principle the staff ‘s
recommendation that the District’s annexation fee be established
at $310 per acre for the 1970-71 fiscal year,and that the
annexation policy include the two special provisions;and,
FURTHER MOVED That the General Counsel be directed to
prepare an annexation policy resolution incoiporating the
aforementioned provisions for the Board’s consideration
8/25/70
H #5
Letter from the Irvine Ranch Jay Panchal representing The
Water District rë:Upper Irvine Company reported on the
Harbor View Hills Annexation Harbor View.Hills —Phase 3
to the City of Newport Beach Annexation to the City of Newport
received and ordered filed Beach which is within the
Irvine Ranch Water District’s
..boux~ar~es and outside the boundary of District No0 5.He
stated that District No.5 might like to consider trading
areas of service bywithdrawai of areas in exchange for
annexing certain other.areas,as was done in District No.7.
It was then moved,seconded and duly carried:That the
letter from the Irvine Ranch Water District,dated August
20,1970,relative to charges to date which have been imposed
on the properties adjacent to District No..5 (Upper Harbor
View Hills Annexation to~e City of Newport Beach),be
received and ordered filed.
Letter from City of Newport The General Manager reported on
Beach received and ordered negotiations with the City of
filed;and directing General Newport Beach relative to amending
Counsel to prepare an amended the agreement for collection of sewer
agreement for collection of connection charges.He stated that
sewer connection charges the City of Newport Beach proposed
five alternate methods of amending
the current agreement in their letter dated August 20,1970?and
that the District’s staff recommends adoption of Alternate ‘E”
a~follows:
-
Alternate “E -Combination of fixed fee and “fixture
units.’The City would receive $4.00 for each single
family detached residential unit.Assuming that each
average residential unit contains twenty “fixture units,”
the City would receive $4.00 for each twenty units
for all other types of construction including,commercial
buildings and all multiple residential buildings.
It was then moved,seconded and duly carried:That the
letter from the City of Newport Beach dated August 20,-
1970,requesting an amendment to the agreement for collection
of sewer connection charges be received and ordered filed;
and that the General Counsel be directed to prepare an
amended agreement incorporating the provisions of Alternate
....“E”and providing for formal renegotations at the end of two
years.
Staff report re:discussions Following a report by the General
with The Irvine Company relative Manager on the present repaymenttoamendingtermsofloanprovisionsofDistrict’s agreement
agreement repayment provisions with The Irvine Company and on the
necessity to defer repayment in
order to provide District No.5 with sufficient capital to
construct immediately needed projects,it was moved,seconded
and duly carried:That the staff be authorized to submit a
formal request to The Irvine Company to amend the existing contract
based on Alternate 2.or Alternate 3 of the staff’s report and that
both proposals be submitted to the Irvine Company for consideration
as to which would be most acceptable to their Company,as follows:
Alternate No.2
(a)The District will pay,on or about October 1,1970,
the principal and interest accrued to that time due
under the terms of the original agreement (approximately$127,000)without regard to the present provision that
the Company must furnish evidence that sewer connection
charges were collected from areas within the DistrictdeielopedbyTheIrvineCompany
-2-
•
•
8/25/70
•#5
•(b)Interest on the unpaid balanc.e accrued between
October 1,1970 and October 1,1971 at a rate of
•
6.5%will be paid October 1,1971.
(c)No principal payment will be made on October
1,1971,but on Octobez 1,1972 and ensuing years,
principal payments will be made as provided in the
existing agreement.
Alternate No.3
(a)The District will pay,on or about October 1,1970,
the principal and interest accrued to that time due
under the terms of the original agreement (approximately
$127,000)without regard to the present provision that
the Company must furnish evidence that sewer connection
charges were collected from areas within the District
•developed by The Irvine Company.
(b)No payment of interest or principal will be made in
.1971.
(c)On October 1,1972,and on each ensuing October 1,
a principal payment,as provided in the existing
agreement,plus interest on the 1971 deferred payment
at 6.5%from October 1,1971 to October 1,1972,will
•bepaid.
Letter from The Irvine Company Moved,seconded and du]y carried:
received and ordered filed~
re:Bayside Trunk Sewer That the letter dated August 19,1970,
relative to relocation of Bayside
Trunk
Sewer between Marine Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway,
be received and ordered filed.
Verbal report of District’s Don Simpson of Shuirman-Simpson,
engineer re:relocation and District’s engineers,reportea on
reconstruction of Bayside meetings with the City of Newport
Drive Trunk Sewer Beach and the District relative to
relocation and reconstruction of
Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer.He stated that the main points of
discussion were whether to relinquish ownership rights in the
present sewer to the City of Newport Beach or maintain it as is,
and to determine the size of the proposed relocated trunk sewer.
Joe Devlin,Director of Public Works for the City of Newport
Beach,expressed his concern as to the condition of the existing
trunk sewer.He suggested that the District’s Board may wish
to participate with the developer in the construction of a
smaller line to serve the local area now being served by the
District’s facility.
Directing General Counsel to Moved,seconded and duly carried:
prepare a Sewer Relocation
Agreement between the District That in accordance with the form~.l
the City of Newport Beach and request of The Irvine Company,
The Irvine Company dated Autust 19,1970,the General
Counsel be directed to prepare a
•Sewer Relocation Agreement between the District,the City of
Newport Beach and The Irvine Company relative to relocation and
reconstruction of the existing trunk sewer in Bayside Drive.
-3-
8/25/70
#5
Adjourrunent Moved,seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No.5 be adjourned.The Chairman declared the meeting
so adjourned at 5:35 p.m.,August25,1970.
Chairman,Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No.5
ATTES~:-
Secretary pro tern,Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No.5
_)‘...