The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes 1970-01-08DISTRICT NO,7 MIT~1J1TES OP THE ADJOURNED REGUlAR MEETING January 8,1970 -7:30 p.m. 1O~t~1~Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,California. Pursuant to ádjournment•of the regular meeting held December 10,1969,the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.7,of Orange County,California,met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date.. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.The roll was called and the secretary reported.a quorum present. DIRECTORS PRESEI~1T:Clifton C..Miller (Chairman), Lorin Griset,Ellis.N.Porter, Don E.Smith and Wm.Hirstein DIRECTORS ABSENT:Howard Rogers V OTHERS PRESENT:Paul G.Brown,Carl Carlson, V Conrad Hohener,Harlan G.Schroth, Robert S.Lee,Allice E.Lee, Charles W.Cox,Leonard Wilbur, Loretta Cox,Will Lindsay,Richard Bailey,Paul M.Woeff,Ann V Woeff,Vie Ardia,Robert C.Thomas, W.E.Snyder,C.Arthur Nisson, Jack Rimel,Mrs.Jack Rimel,John Sigler,Wayne Sylvester and Fred A.Harper,Secretary *.*********. Hearing on Resolution of The Secretary reported that this Intention No.69-lO4-7,~was the time and place fixed for Assessment District No.~the hearing of protests or objections against the work or the District,as described in Resolution of Intention No.69-10)4—7,in the matter of the construction of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in “ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.8,“as described in said resolution. The Secretary also reported that affidavits in support of the publication of the Resolution of Intention,the mailing of printed notices of the adoption of said resolution,and the posting of the Notice of Improvement, as required by law,had been made and are on file in the office of the Secretary.The Chairman then inquired of the Secretary if any written protests or objections against the work or the District had been filed with him in said matter.The Secretary reported that two written protests had been filed with him prior to the time set for the hearing by the following: Mr.H.C.Hansen 10552 Newport Avenue Santa Ana,California Charles W.Cox,et al Willis Lane Santa Ana,California 1/8/70 #7 I, -1 0 ~4’VTO The Chairman then announced that this was the time and place-set~for the hearing of protests or objections against the work or the district,each as set forth in the Resolution of Intention hereinbefore mentioned,and asked if any,pne present desired to be heard in said matter. After all protests and objections had been made,it was moved by Director Griset and seconded by Director Porter ,and unanimously carried by the roll call vote of all Directors present,that all written:protests be referred to the Engineer of Work for checking and report as the percentage of the area represented thereby. The Secretary reported that this was the time and place to which the hearing of protests or objections against the work or the District,as described in Resolution •of Intention No.69-10)4-7,in the matter of the con struction of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in ItASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO,~was continued for the purpose of hearing the report of the •~•Engineer of Work as the percentage of protests and for further action., The Engineer of Work reported that the protests re presented less than 6%of the total area of the assessment district. AU protestants having been heard and an opportunity having been given to all persons desiring to be heard,and a full,,fair and impartial hearing having been granted,and the Board of Directors having 0beforeitadiagramoftheAssessmentDistrictand being familiar with the assessment district and also having considered all protests filed,and having considered the matter as to the area of property •represented by said protestants,Director Griset presented the following minute resolution and moved its adoption: WHEREAS,certain protests have been filed by Mr..H.C.Hansen,and Charles W.Cox.and others protestingagainst the doing of the work and improvement described in Resolution of Intention No.69-10)4-7,or against the Assessment District therein described;and WHEREAS,the Board of Directors has carefully considered all protests or objections and.having considered the area of the District represented • •by said protests; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by this Board of Directors that it does hereby find and determine that the said protests or objections have been made by the o~mers of less than one-half of the ••••• •area of the property to be assessed for said •-~work and improvement,as set forth in said Resolution of Intention No.69-104—7;and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that each and all of the said protests or objections be and they hereby are overruled and denied, -2- ti ~1 I 0 Said motion was seconded by Director Smith and carried by the following roll call vote.: AYES:Directors.Clifton C.Miller (Chairman), Lorin Griset,.Wm.Hirstein,Ellis N.Porter,and Don E.Smith NOES:None ABSENT:.Director Howard Rogers ~‘8flo Director Griset then offered and moved the adoption of Resolution Ordering Work No.70_11._7 in the matter of the construction of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in “ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.8”,which motion was seconded by Director Porter and upon roll call vote was adopted by the following vote: AYES:Directors Clifton C.Miller (Chairman), Lorin Griset,Wm.Hirstein,Ellis N.Porter,and Don E.Smith NOES:None ABSENT:Director Howard Rogers Director Smith then offered and moved the adoption of ResóThit~on No.70-5-7,directing that the bids or proposals for the work to be constructed -in “Assessment District No.8”may be opened, examined,and declared by the Secretary prior to the presentation to the Board of Directors,which motion was .seconded by Director Hirstein and upon roll call vote was adopted bythe following vote: AYES:Director Clifton C.Miller (Chairman), Lorin Griset,Wm.Hirstein,Ellis N. Porter,and Don E.Smith NOES:None ABSENT:Director Howard Rogers Adoption of emergency The General Counsel advised the Ordinance No.710 Board that upon the adoption of its original connection charge ordinance in 1962,District No.7 repealed Ordinance No.701 which included water quality standards for dischargers to the district’s system.In view of the action taken by the Board on December 10th,directing the General Counsel to join in litigation with the Costa Mesa Sanitary District against Z-D Products to prohibit the company’s continued disposal of flammables into the sewerage system,Mr.Nisson recommended the adoption of an emergency ordinance which prohibits: Any flammable or explosive liquid or gas or any substance which singly or in combination with other substances could cause an explosive,radioactive or toxic condition in the sewerage system of the District; Any solid or viscous substance capable of causing obstruction to the flow in sewers or other interference •with the proper operation of the sewerage facilities of the District. -3— The General Manager expressed concern that the proposed emergency ordinance had not been reviewed or discussed with the special Ad Hoc Committee or the Orange County Chamber of Commerce,and that some misunderstandings may arise.The Chair then recognized Mr.Will Lindsay, Chairman of the Ad Hoc Committee,who advised that while there was not sufficient time to poll the members of the committee,he would not expect any serious objections from the industrial community. Following a discussion,it was moved,seconded and duly carried by roll call vote,that Ordinance No.710, establishing standards for sewage and industrial wastes and providing penalties for violations thereof,be adopted. dated November 1969. Mr.Ed Wells,of Bartle Wells Associates reviewed again for the Directors the recommendations contained within their Financing Sewerage Improvements Report, It was then moved,seconded and duly carried:That the letter from Bartle Wells Associates,dated January 6,1970, relative to revision of Tables 8 and 9 of the Financing Sewerage Improvements Report,~ated November 1969,submitted by Bartle Wells Associates,be received and ordered filed. 0 1/8/70 #7 .1 0 Letter from Bartle Wells Associates.,dated January 6,1970,received and ordered filed Meeting with community leaders Following discussion of the concerning District’s ultimate Master Plan for the ultimate sewerage.Master Plan and lonR sewera~e requirements of the range financing program District and the recommended financing program to construct the necessary facilities,it was determined that these plans should be reviewed and discussed with the active leaders of the community within District No.7..It was then moved,seconded and duly carried:That the General Manager be authorized to arrange a special meeting of the community leaders for twelve noon on January 26th. Adjournment It was moved,seconded and duly -carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.7,be adjourned.The Chairman declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:~45 p.m.,January 8,1970. ATTEST: Ci-lairman,i3oara or Directors 01. County Sanitation District No.7 Secretary,Boar~i of Directors of County ~