Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1968-06-19DISTRICTS NOS.1 &7 MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING June 19,1968 -5:00 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,California Pursuant to adjournments of the regular meeting held June 12, 1968,the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1 and 7,of Orange County,California,met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District’s Board. DISTRICT NO.1 Directors present: Directors absent:None DISTRICT NO.7 Directors present:Clifton C.Miller (Chairman), Thomas McMichael,Howard Rogers, Don E.Smith,Ellis N.Porter, and C.M.Featherly Directors absent:None ________________ Paul G.Brown,Conrad Hoherier,Carl Carlson,Sidney L.Lowry,~Tayne Sylvester,Paul Hogan,Jack J. William Eppinger,Jay Panchal, Fred A.Harper,Secretary DISTRICT 7 This being the time and place ~e-open.publi.c fixed by the Board of Directors hearing on for continuing the public hearing Annexation No.14 on proposed Annexation No.l~1 to to the District the District,it was moved,seccnded and duly carried: That the public hearing be re-opened. The Secretary reported that no additional protests had.been received since the hearing was continued (May 23rd,1968), and that five of the original petitioners had submitted requests that their names be removed from the protest petition submitted May 23,1968,and that their protests he withdrawn. Following a discussion it was moved,seconded and duly carried: That,the public hearing on proposed Annexation Mc.1/4 to the District,be closed. ________________ The written report of the staff, ________________ relative to the sufficiency of ________________ protests filed against proposed ________________ Annexation Mo.14 was read;the findings of the staff were as Thomas McMichael (Chairman), Clifton C.Miller,Ellis N.Porter, and C.M.Featherly OTHERS PRESENT follows: Rimel, and DISTRICT 7 Staff report on sufficiency of protests 6-19-68 9 1.Percent of Landowners protesting =-=2c% 45 $12,380 Who own ——=15.7%or less than 16%of $78,840 assessed land valuation.However,the General Counsel has ruled that there was only one valid landowner protest that could be considered. 6 2.Percent of voters protesting =—=9.5 or less 63 than l~ It was then moved,seconded and duly carried:That the staff report be approved,received and ordered filed. The Board was advised by the General Counsel on May 23rd that if less than 25%of the property owners protested,or less than 25%of the registered voters within the proposed annexation protested,the Board could order the territory annexed without any further proceedings. DISTRICT 7 Moved,seconded and duly carried: Adoption of resolution ordering territory That the Board of Directors adopt annexed Resolution No.68-57-7,ordering annexation of territory to the District (Newport Avenue,Annexation No.14).Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved,seconded and duly carried: Report of the Engineer of Work re:ConstructIon That the construction bids for bIds received for Assessment Assessment District Mo.7 (Holly District No.7 Tree Lane Area),be received arid ordered filed. DISTRICT 7 The Engineer of Work further Awarding contract for reported that the staff had mailed work in Assessment to each property owner of record District No.7 within the assessment district, following the opening of the bids, a letter advising them of the low-bid amount and requesting that each property owner indicate whether or not he wished the project to proceed even though the contract price ($32,998.00) exceeded the engineers’estimate ($24,648.00).A stamped, return-addressed envelope was enclosed for the mailing convenience of the property owners.The Secretary reported that affirmative responses were received from approximately 62%of the owners, indicating that the project should be awarded on the basis of the low bid submitted by Mercury Company. The Secretary notified the Board that this is the time and place for the Board ~o consider the Secretary’s written report of the 0 -2- 6-19-68 bids received pursuant to Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals for the construction of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in “ASSESS~NT DISTRICT NO.7,”as contemplated by Resolution of Intention No.68-25-7. The Secretary further notified the Board that pursuant to the authority granted him by Resolution No.68-45-7,he did on June 6,1968,publicly receive,open,examine and declare three bids.Reference is hereby made to the bids on file with the Secretary for details as to the unit prices and kinds or classes of work to be done. The Secretary then presented to the Board of Directors his written report upon the said bids so received.The Engineer of Work then reported to the Board that he had checked and tabulated all of the bids received for the said work as des cribed in Resolution of Intention No.68-25-7 and that the bid of Thirty-two Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety-Eight Dollars (submitted by John P.Bacich,doing business as Mercury Company is the lowest regular bid received for said improvement. Director Smith then offered and moved the adoption of Resolution of Award of Contract No.68-55-7,awarding the contract to Mercury Company at the prices named in said bid,which said bid being the lowest regular bid submitted for said improvement. The motion was seconded by Director Featherly and upon roll call vote,said Resolution of Award of Contract No.68-55-7 was adopted by the following vote: AYES:Directors Clifton C.Miller (Chairman),Thomas McMichael,Howard Rogers,Don E.Smith,Ellis N. Porter,and C.M.Featherly NOES:None ABSENT:None DISTRICTS 1 AND 7 Mr.Conrad Hohener of Boyle /R~port of the engineers Engineering submitted to the On Temporary Relief Measures Directors a Report on Temporary for the Gisler-Red Hill Relief Measures for the Gisler •Trunk Sewer Red Hill Trunk Sewer.Mr.Hohener reviewed the report which stated that the District’s Gisler-Red Hill Trunk is now flowing •at 7~of its peak capacity and that a projection of the population growth in the area served by thIs sewer indicates that peak capacity will be reached by the end of 1969. The report lists three basic plans for providing temporary relief measures which would add 5 million gallons capacity to the existing sewer system.This would allow continued development within the District in the interim until the •DistrIct can finance and construct major permanent facilities, scheduled for 1972. •Following a lengthy discussion concerning Plan A-2,which anticipates the joint use of District No.l’s Dyer Road Trunk Sewer,the staff and engineers were instructed to discuss this plan with the Public Works staff of the City of Santa Ana. It was then moved,seconded and duly carried: -3- • 6-19-68 That the report submitted by the engineers be taken under submission for study,and further consideration in July. DISTRICT 1 Moved,seconded and duly carried: •Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 6:30 p.m., June 19,1968. DISTRICT 7 Moved,seconded and duly carried: Ad journment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 6:30 p.m., June 19,1968. ________ . Secretary / . -~-