HomeMy WebLinkAboutDistrict 11 Minutes 1952-10-22MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11
ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA
October 22~1952 at 8:00 p.m.
Room 239,110i4.West Eighth Street
Santa Ana,California
The Board of Directors met in regular session at the hour of
3:00 p.m.,October 22,1952 in Room 239 at 11OL1.tJest Highth Street,
Santa Ama,California.
Chainiian Finch called hhe joint r~.eetin~~of the Districts’
Boards to order at 8:00 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of
the Board to be present.
Directors present:Willis H.Warner (Chairman)
Vernon E.Langenbeck
Roy Seabridge
Directors absent:None
Others Present:Raymond II.Ribal,Chief Erw4neer and
General Manager
C.Arthur ~isson,Jr.
Harry Ashton
John A~Carollo
j.A.~ooiiey
ic.j.iarrison
Ra;ynond ~:crtel
I’Jai her .T~a~isey
.~cenneth r>erry
Walter Chaffee
Ora Mae Merritt,Secretary
Approval of The Boards of Directors of’County Sani
Minut~tation Districts Mos.1,2,3,5,7 an~
11 took the following action:
Moved by Director willis H.Warner,seconded by Director
Willia~iH.Hirstein and duly carried:
That the minutes of the meetin~s held on October 1 and
October ~,l~52 be approved as mailed out.
-1—
~74
Joint_Adriin~s~The Boa~rds of Directors of County
trativeWarz~ant Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,
Rister 7 and 11 too~c the fo11owin~action:
—
Moved by ~ireqtor Hugh W.‘garden,seconded by DirecLor
William H.1-lirstein a~ic3.duly ca~riod;
That the Joint Adriinietrativo ~arrant Register be approve
for signature and payment of:
War rant
Demand No.In Favor Of
_____
JA—L~O3 Davis Stationers 1.68
L~0L~Dennis Printers 15.31
L~05 Kleen-Line Corporation 3.52
L~06 Standard Oil Company of California 32.75
L107 F.R.Harwood,Postmaster 30.00
83.26
Correspondence,
Connuni c at~io ns
and reports filed
1.Quarz;erly ireii~The Secretary reported receipt of certi
fied quarterly audit report from the
firm of .LDehi and Company,and read
balances of each Districtst funds,
A notion was made by Director ~iilis H.Warner seconded
by Director Vernon E.Lan~enbeck and duly carried by the
Boards of Directors of County Seaii.tation Dis.~ricts Nos.1,2,
3,5,6,7,8 and 11:
That tLLe audit report for the quarter ending September
30,1952,received fror~i Diehl and Company he received and
ordered filed.
2.Vacation request The Secretary read.a letter from Nary
E.Glllisn:io,stenographer in the offic~
of the Joint Adriiriis tro~tive orCanizabion requesting paid
vacation.
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
hoved by Director Nelson N.Law-icr,seconded by Director
Vincent L.Humeston and duly carried by the Boards of
Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,6
and 11:
That Nary E.Gillispie erirloyed by the Districts as
Senior Stenographer—Clerk in.the Joint Administrative
Orge.nization,he and she is hereby authorized to take a
vacation with pay heginnin~November 10,1952 to and in—
cluding November 21,1952,
Report of the Director Robert H.Boney,Chairman ~ro
Execut~vo Committee ton of the Executive Committee reported
upor the meeting held on October 17,
1952,as follows:
Amount
-2—
~75
l~Relative to the BoardsT request fqr recorwiendation upon
filling the vacancy created by th~resignation of the Chief
Er~gineer and General Manager,the Co~mittee reviewed the
nan~factors facing the Districts in establishing sound
adminis tratiori and or~r~iz~tjon of the joint Districts!
program.~e~at~on of qu~1~ications of men who
had applied ~the posit~pn,the Corit~ittee unanimously
reco:cnriended the employrient of Mr.Le~N.Nelson as Chief
Engineer and General Manager upon a trial basis at the
monthly salary of ~l,OOO.OO per month,and that regular
empioyi:ient and amount of salary be determined by mutual
agreement between the Districts and Mr.Nelson within a
period not to exceed six months,hr.Boney reported the
Committee had been advised by Mr.Nelson that if the
Districts desired his services,he could report for duty
about ~ve~Ther 1st,
Director honey stated that i”u~~Nelson had previously been
interviewed by a three man Conm:Lttee comprised of Director
Warner,Director Warden and :~oimer Director Reed.Director
Warner was called upon for further information as to the
background of Mr.Nelson.
Director Warner reported that at the tine Mr.Nelson
appeared before the Gommittee he was employed by the City
of Rochester,Minnesota as Chief of the Utilities Commission.
that he is a registered civil and electrical engineer and
has now gone into private consulting work.Director Marner
stated that Mr.Nclson enjoys a wide reputation as a vary
able man,oven teripered and witb.the ability to work with
and.rot along with people in very complex situations;that
his qualifications would well fit h:im for the position now
open where there will be a voiu~io of administrative work
tlio Manager will be called upon to carry out.
2.Chairman Boney reported that the Committee had held over
the business of making a recoon.dation on the requested
annexation bo County Sanitation District No.3,until all
information would be available and a report received from
the J.0.S.
Enplo~ment of The Boards of Directors took the
Chief Engineer folio win;action:
and General
Manager Novoci hj Director 3 L McBride,
seconded by Director ~n B.Haibor
and duly carried by the hoards of Directors of County Sani
tation Districts Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and 11:
That the report of the Executive Committee be approved
and accepted;and that Mr.Leo N,Nelson be and•~rie is
hereby employed as Chief Engineer and General Manager for
County Sanitation Districts Mos.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and II
unon a trial basis at the monthly salary of ~1,00O.00 per
month,effective November 1,1952;and that regular employ
ment and amount of salary be determined by mutual agreement
between the Districts and.~ir,:;Tclson within a period not
~exct~od six months,
Director C.N.Nelson,Cha~man of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No.6 stated that
inasmuch as Mr.Lee H.Nelson is his cousin,he believed it
to be only ethical to sever his connections with the
Districts and that he would resign as a rieriber of the Board
of Ms District,
-3—
Report of the D~rec~or Warner,Chairman of the
Finance Cor~iittbe Finance Commi~tee reported that
the Committee had been working
upon the agreement wit1~the engineers;but,since the last
meeting,business affairs of members of the Co~iittee had
made it impossibJ~o to hold very many n~etings together for
the purpose of studying d~,s of the contract,and as they
felt this should he given very c~refi~l ~onsideration and a
draft of the contract prepared and mailed to the Directors
ahead of the joint meeting of the Boards,the Committee
recommended that their report be hold over and made a special
matter of business at the regular meeting of the Boards on
November 12,1952;that previous to this meetin~,the
Comriittee could have the contract prepared in detail and sent
to tJ.le Directors.
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
iloved by Director Nelson N.Launer,seconded by Director
Norman U.Miller and duly carried by the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 1l~
That tile report of the Finance Committee be approved and
accepted.
______
Director Boney requested that the
________
offjcjsl action of the Executive
Corunittee relative to employment
______________
of legal counsel for the Districts
be read from the minutes of the
meeting of the Executive Committee;and that bhe resolution
authorizing employment of Mr.Nisson be read.
At th.c request of the Chairman,the Secretary read the
following excerpt from the minutes of the meeting of the
Executive Committee held on October 3~1952:
Robert U.Boney (Chairman)
Thomas J.Radington,alternate
~or Nr.Hugh ~J,~Jarden
J.L.McBride,alternate for
Mr.Courtney H.Chandler
Braden Finch
C.N.Nelson
Vincent L.Flurieston
Others present:Raymond R,Ribal
B,J.Marks
K.J.Harrison
Ora Mae Merritt,Secretary
After a full discussion upon the employment of an
attorney for the Districts,a motion was made,duly seconded and
carried,that recommendation be xiade to the Districts’Boards that
C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.be employed as the attorney for the Districts
at the rate of ~355.OO per month,providing Mr.Nisson “terminates
his employment as the City Attorney for Tustin.”
The Secretary read Resolution No.93,authorizing employ
ment of C.Arthur Nissori,Jr.as legal counsel for the Joint Adriln—
istrative Organization of the eight County Sanitation Districts,
adopted by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts,
Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11 on October 10,1951.This resolutioi
was carried in full in the condensed minutes of the meeting of
October 10,1951 which were approved by the Boards on October 2L~,
1951.
Business held over:
re:clarification
of terms of employ
ment of 1o~1 ~our~sel
Directors present:
-.Li.—
177
Tho Chainnan called upon Mp,Niason for a report upon
the terms of his enployment.Mr.Nisson reported that ha had no
knowledge of the Exocutive Cornittoa minutes and that he had not
boon asked by anyone to agree to tonus of enploynent other than
those contained in Resolution No.98;that if the Boards desired
his enploynont to be based upon tho terms contained in the Execu
tivu Corwtittoe minutes,k~e wou]4 then ropoi’~his decision.
There followed a fufl discussion by the Directors as to
whether or not there night be a conflict in services perforned by
the logal counsel in serving a city and the Districts.
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
Novod by Director Milford ti.Dahl,seconded by Diroctor
Hugh W.‘Jardon:
That Mr.Nisson’s onploynent as Legal Counsel for the
Districts bo continued in accordance with Resolution No.98,adopto
by the Boards of Directors of County Sa.sibation Districts Nos.1,2,
3,5,6,7,8 and 11 on October 10,1952.
Director Boney spoke to the notion,stating that at the
tine tho Corwiitteo.reconnonded Mr.Nisson’s enploynont,nanes of
other attorneys prosonted to the Connittoe wore elininated from
consideration because they were attornoys for cities within the
Districts;and that hr.Nisson’s name was considered only because
they wure intonnod he would resign as the attorney for the City of
Tustin if appointod legal counsel for the Districts.
•Director Lan;enbeck stated that ho had been aware of the
fact that Mr.Nisson had not resigned as attorney for Tustin,but
realized that it is difficult for a city to appoint an attorney
upon short notice and that be had not raised the question as to the
terns of’Hr.Nisson’s employment until the city had had sufficient
tine to appoint a successor to Hr,Nisson.
Mr.Nisson stated that if tho najority of the Boards
desired that ho make a deoision to continue his employment
in accordance with the reconnendations contained in the
minutes of the Executivo Conrnitto&s noeting,he would offer
his resignation as lesal counsel to the Districts,offective
as of Octobur 31,1952
The Chairman called for roll call vote upon the notion:
The vote was polled by roll call vote by Districts and
the Secretary reported the notion lost by the following vote:.
BOARD OF DIRi~XJTORS
DISTRICT NO.1 Ayes:Directors hilford W.Dahl,and J.L.
McBride
Noes:Director Wiflis H.Warner
Absent:None
BOARD OF DIRi!~CWRS
DISTRICT IV 2
___
Ayes:Directors Hugh If.Warden and
Charles E.Stevens
Noes:Directors Robert H.Boney,Don B.
Haibor,Willis H.Warner and
William H.Birstein
Absent:Director Frank J.Schweitzer,Jr.
-5..
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT MC 3
-—
~yes;i~i~ector~Hugh N.Warden,Nelson
H.La1~nor,C.R.Miller and Joseph
Webbor
Noes:Dj~ector Willis H.~arnor
Absent:None
HOARD OF DI~b~CTOr~S
D1STRICT NO.S Ayes~None
____—
Noes;Directors Bradon Finch,Nornan
H.Miller and Willis H.Warner
Absent:None
BOARD OF ~i RECTORS
DISTRICT MC.6 Ayes:None
Noes:Directors C.H.Nelson,Willis n.
Warner ar.td Norman H.Miller
Absoilt:None
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.7 Ayes:Directors Vl.lcent L.Hurieston and
J.L.McBride
Noes :Director Willis H.Warner
Absent:None
HOARD OF D1NfCTQBS
DISfRICT ~o.B Ayes:Director Harold B.Edwards
-
Noes:Director Willis H.Warner
Absent:Director John H.Cropper
BOARD OF DIR.S~TOHS
DISTRICT_HO.11 Ayes:None
Noes:Directors Willis H.Warner,
Vcri:ion B.Langenbock and Roy
Seabridge
Absent:None
After announcement.of the vote,the Chairman requested
the legal counsel to state t;ho mb as to the status of a tie
vote.hr,}:Jisson reported that in the event of a tie vote,the
motion would be lost.
Mr.Nisson offered his ros~nation as legal counsel for the
Districts,to become effective October 31,1952.
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
Moved by Director Willis H.Warner,seconded.by Director
Vernon B.Langenbcck:
That tb.c resignation of I”ir.C.Arthur NiSsofl,as legal counse1
for the Distric 1s,be accepted,offoetivu as of October 31,1952,
The vote was polled by roll call vote by .Distr:Lcts and the
Secretary reported the notion lost by the followin.g vote:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT ‘\O 1 ~yos Dirucbor ~J~lii&H Jarncx
_________-
Noes:Directors J.B.McBride and
Hilford N.Dahl
Absent:None
BOARD.Cf DIFJ~CTOflS
DISTRICT NO •
2 Ayes:Directors Robert H.Honey,Don H.
1-~aahor,
Will is H.Jarner and
wi:Lli~~H.1-lirstein
Noes:Directors HUg1~b.1~rden and
Charles H.Stevens
Absent:Director Frank J.Schwoitzer,Jr.
:~79
Ayc~:J~irootor Willis H.Warner
Noes:Directors Hugh W.Warden,Nelson N.
Launer,C.H.Miller and Joseph
Web ucr
Absent:None
_______
Ayes;Directors Bradon Finch,Nor~nan i-i.
Miller and Willis H.Warner
Noes:None
Absent:None
_________
Directors C.N.Nelson,Bradon
Finch and Willis H.~Iarrior
BOARD O~DIRROTORS
DISTRICT NO.7 Ayes:Director Willis H.Warner
Noes:Directors Vincent L.Huiicston and
J.L.McPride
Absent:None
BOARD OF D:{P OTOHS
DISTRICT NO •
8
_____
Ayes:Directors Willis H.Warner,Vernon
B,Lanr~onheck and Roy Seabridgo
Noes :1~OflO
Absent:None
_____
Director Warner led a discussion or
____________
the notion passed by the Boards on
____
October ~i,1952,which would tcrr~—
_____
mate the Districts!eraployoes as
______
of Novcr~ber 1,1952 and provided
for vacation connonsurate with
~Jarnor stated that the E~ecutive
:e~otion and the effect it would have
upon the con~ietion of District hoe.1 and 6 lines,and offered
the suggesi;ion that the Districts’cniployeos he retained until
the arrival of Hr.Lee N.Nelson for his deternaination as to the
temnaination c1ato of the ersploycos whose services would no longer
be needed;and that the previous r.rotion be rescinded and another
passed by tiie Boards specifically setting forth a method for
computing paid terminal vacations,recommending that such a
formula follow as nearly as possible the County1 s policy of
granting paid vacation to per diem employees,except that no
terminal vacation be given unless the employee had worked for
three nrionths or longer in the service of ti-ic Districts
After a gcr.~oral discussion,the Boards of Directors took
the following action:
Moved by Director J.L.McBride,seconded by Director Roy
Soabridge and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of Count~y
Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11:
BOARD OP DIR~CTQRS
BOARD OF :oIffCcToRS
DISTRI CT NO.5
BOARD OF ~IRBCToRS
DISTRICT NO 6 Ayes:
Noes:None
Absent:None
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
BOARD OF D:RECTORS
DISTRICT_NO •11
Director Willis H.Warner
.Uir~ctor harold N.Edwards
Director John H.Cropper
Clarification of
previous action
_____
relative to term
____
ination of O~fOOS
on Octo2
length of service,Director
Cornnittoo had reviewed,this
‘-7—
Y 00
That the following motion adopted by the Boards of
Directors on October ~,1952:
“That the present employees of iho joint Districts be
retained until November 1,1952 and that they be given vacatio:
comricnsurato with the length of c~iployrient,based upon two
weeks per year.”
be and the ssrie is hereby rescinded.
Authorizing paid The Boards of Directors took the
terminal vacat13n~following action:
Moved by Director Hugh ~f.~fardon.,seconded by Director
Joseph ~Jebbor and duly carried ~Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Kos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11:
That tonelnal vacations for employees involuntarily loavin~
the scrvlccs of the Districts after October 31,1952 be calcu—
lated on the basis of one day’s paid vacation for each 20 days
worked;that said temin.al vacation pay be paid from the fund
or funds that the omployoe~s salary has been charged to during
the course of his employment in the same ratio of past payment,
and that 21 working days per month be used for computing daily
rates of pay.
The Chair recognized hr.Kenneth Ferry,employed by the
Districts as Assistant Engineer,hr.Ferry,requested the
Dis tricts’consideration of two weeks’advance notice for
employees being involuntarily released from their employmon
with the Districts.
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
Moved by Director Roy Seabridr~o,seconded by Director Vornc
E.Langenheck and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11:
That two weeks’advance notice be given each employee
before severance oi eriploynont by the Dis bricts.
NE~BUSINESS
1.Reaffirmation of Director Bonoy requested the
contracG with Boards?consideration of roaffir—
Mealy Tibbitis mdng the contract with Hoaly
Company
________
Tibbitts company for the con
struction of the marine section
of the ocean outfall to the full 7,000 feet;stating
that the tine limit for reaffirmation would expire on
November 3,1952.
After a general discussion,the Boards of Directors
adopted Resolution No.231,dotormining the length of the
ocean outfall sewer (marine section)and directing County
Sanitation District No.1 to so oroceod with the constnic—
tion,Certified copies of this Resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
1
2.Extension of time Chairman Finch reported that the 30-day
for_su~iission~T extension of tine for submission of
fina~plans and plans and specifications agreed upon by
specifications the Districts and the design engineers
would expire November 1,1952.The
Boards of Directors took the followin~action:
Moved by Director Willis El.~‘iarnor,seconded by Director
Robert H.Boney and duly carried by the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and ii:
That the Boards of Directors hereby request the privi—
logo of holding in abeyance work on the plans and speci
fications for an additional 15 days from October 30,1952,
the expiration date of work suspension requested by the
Boards on October 1,1952 and granted by the engineers on
that date;and that the time for completion of plans and
specifications by the design en~incers be extended 15 days.
Mr.John A.Carollo,representing the design engineers,
approved and agreed to the exto~1sion requested by the Boards.
3.Pr~sed Review Director Vincent L.Humeston proposed,
of estthatos~y as a method of expediting the business,
a_consu1tii~.g of the Districts and in the interest
engineerin~fii’m of positive determination that the
bond fundo available are insufficient
to construct the joint facilities under the original bond
proposal plan that a consultir,g engineering firm be employed
to review the estimates.
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
Moved by Director Vincent L.1-lurieston,seconded by
Director Milford W.Dahi:
That the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
employ a reputable engineerin~firm to review the current
status of the hon.d engineer’s plan to determine whether or
not the proposed modification recommended by the Finance
Committee will best serve the eocds of the Districts in
relation ~the bond plan.
The Chairman called for discussion of the motion and
Director Warner expressed the opinion that a notion for
employment should state terms and conditions and author~
ization for payment of services rendered;and recommended
that the notion include instructions for securing proposals
from consulting engineering firms as the basis of payment.
Director Warner offered a substitute notion for consider
at:Lon,and with the consent of the mover and the seconder
the following motion was substituted for the original motion,
and was duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts NOS.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11:
That Directors Hunoston and Warden ho designated as a
Committee of two and that they be instructed to secure a
definite proposal from some competent engineering firm for
services they deem necessary in the review of the bond plan
and the modification plan and thet the Committee so dosig—
•nated report back to the Boards at the earliest possible
time b
—9-
Li..Availability of A discussion.~as hold upon the possibility
~of calling for bids under the bond proposal
plans for usc in plan.hr.John A.Carollo reported that all
calling for bids plans and specifications under the bond
proposal plan,o~ccopting the treatment
plant,wore ~iow comiDioto and available and that the treat
ment plant nians and specifications were 6O~complete,and
sug,~ostod that the Boards consider calling for bids on the
completed plans in order to detunuinc the amount of funds
then ava:ilablc for the treatment plant.Director Warner
roq.uos tad hr.Ribal’s opinion on the rocoiinondation of Mr.
Garollo.Mr.Ribal stated that he had always held that bids
should be called for and concurred in this procedure to
doterPl:Lno costs;but that ho could see nothing wrong with
the review as suggested by Mr.Rurieston.
The Boards of Directors took the following action~
i’Iovud by Director Willis H.Warner,seconded by
Director Norman H.Miller anc1.duly carried by the Boards
of D~roctors of County Sanitetion Districts Nos.1,2,3,
5,6,7 and 11:
That the design engineers be requested to present
plans and specifications for ti~ic ~ushard Street Trunk and
Treatment Plant Trunk Sewers to the Districts before the
next meeting of the Boards,on October 29,1952.
Hr.E~ihal stated that ho had reviewed the plans and
specifications on the Ellis Av.~nue Trunk Sower and rocori—
mended correlation,of certain items in the specifications;
and.,at the request of Director 1~aibor,itemized the
correlations which ho stated to he of dimensional nature.
Report of the Chief Mr.Rihal road.his report and recom—
Engineer dc~~1 riondations to t}’~e i)ircctors.This report
______-
is on file ifl.the off ice of the Secretary.
_______—-‘~
The Boards of iiiroct,ors took the following
action upon the recommendations contained in the written
report of the Chief En~inccr and General Manager:
1.Authorizing Raymond A motion was bade by Director Willis H.
M.Hortol o sign Warner,seconded by Director Roy Soabridgo
certain papers and duly carried by the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts Nos,1,2,
3,5,6,7,3 a1~d 11:.
T~iat Raymond M.Hortel,e:~Dloycd as Supervising
Engineer by the joint County Sanitation Districts,be and
heis hereby authorized to aoprovc time cards,sign the
pa~jro1l and warrant deriancie,cign letters requesting the
County Auditor to transfer such funds as nay be necessary
for the pajmcnt of obligations,oversee the work now under
consGruct:Lon,certify progress pcç~uonts,prepare and sign
engineer’s certificates and L.s bir~atos during the tin.o that
Raynond H,Hibal,Chief Engineur and General hianagor is on
vaoat.~on and until such time no Mr.Ribal’s successor
arrives.
-10 —
A motion was made by Dirictor Willis
H.Warrior,seconded by Director J~L.
HeBrido and duly carried by the
Boards of Directors of County Sanita~ion Districts Nose l,2~
3,~,6,7,and 11:
That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 hereby authorize
Ra~auorid M.Hortol,Suporvisin~Engineer,to fill tho vacanc~
created by the resi~riatier~of Carl S.Starnos,by employing
Jack R.~hiimer as engineering aide at the salary of ~3O3.OO
per month for the period October 27th to October 31,1952,
Inc lus :i.vci•
______
Thu Chairman called upon Mr.Ribal
____
for a report upon the adequacy of thc
_________
staff of the Districts to perform thL
_____
preliminary engineering work when
construction work is started on the
_______
ocean outfall.Mr.Ribal reported
•ttiet the present survey crow would bL
enga~ed on the work now under construction for Districts
Nos.1 and 6,and that tbuee would he a need for a survey
crew r nre1ininar~y work on Uho ocean outfall sewer.
A notion was node by Director Willis H.Warner,
seconded by D:Lrector C.H.Hillor and duly carried by the
Boards of ~irectors of County San:i.tation Districts Nos.1,
2,3,5,6,7 and ii:
That the Boards of Dirccthrs of County Sanitation
Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 hereby ask the desii~n
engthc~rs to perform the gence:’ai supervision on constructio5..
of the marine section of the ocean outfall sower,under the
terms of their contract,and that they supervise the
necessary preliminary ong~ncL;ring work as a courtesy to the
Districts;and that the design engineers,Harrison &Woolley
and Headman,Ferguson &Carello,he paid by the County
Sanitat:Lon Districts for the fluid party required for this
work while the final contract ~oth them is being worked out.
hr.Harrison,rep resent in:blie design engineers,stated
that they were ~ri:L:Ling to grant the i~iquus b of the Districts for
the porfo rna~:~cu oi services reqieLr~~d.
Adjournment The Boards of •~irec bars took the
______—
i’oliomin~action:
It~ovod by Director t~oy Soabridge,seconded by Director
Charles H.htuvens and duly carried:
That this meeting be adjourned to the hour of 8:00
p.m.,on October 29,1952 in Room 239 at lloL1.West Li~iith
Stru.~t,Santa Ana,California.
1ihcreupon,the Chain~au declared the meeting so
adlournod at 10:20 n .11.
2.Authorizing enplo~iui~
of Jack H.Wuii~u~
Authori zing Harrison
&Woolley ot ol
to supervise the
preliminary wo±~k
~t:~~~ff~Tn:
sower
—ii —
~‘1
_~-~2
Chairman,Board of Directors
County Sanitation Distric~No.11
Oran~c County,California
ATTEST:
~cro ary,Poara of Diroctors
County Sanitation District No.11
Oran~o County,California
—12 —
~85
RESOLUTION NO.231-11
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OCUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA,DETERMINING THE LENGTH OF THE OCEAN
OUTFALL SEUER (MARI1\TE SECTION)AHD DIRECTING
COUNTY SANITATION DISTHIC11 NO.1 OF ORANGE
COUNTY TO SO PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION..
WHEREAS:County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7
and 11 of Orange County,California by Resolution 206 dated August
6,1952,directed said District No.1 to award a contract to Healy
Tibbitts Construction Company for the construction of the Ocean
Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)and
WHEREAS:said award of contract was made on the condition the
the length of the outfall be confirmed within sixty (60)days from
the date of the contract,and
WHEREAS:said sixty (60)day period will expire on November 3
1952,now therefore,be it
RESOLVED:that County Sanitation District No.11 of Orange
County,California does hereby find &nd deten~ine that the Ocean
Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)be cdnstructed to Station 70 /00 a~:
shown on the plans and specifications therefor adopted by Resolutio
No.l7Lj-11 of the Board of Directors of last said District.
FURTHER RESOLVED:that County Sanitation District No.1 of
Orange County,California acting as Contracting Agent for itself
and County Sanitation Districts Nos.2,3,5,6,7 and 11 be and i~’
hereby directed to reaffirm the provision of the contract with the
Healy Tibbitts Construction Company;that the Ocean Outfall Sewer
(Marine Section)be constniicted to Station 70 /00 as hereinabove
referred to.
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted at a regular
meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
Mo.11 on the 22nd day of October,1952
Secreatry,Board 01 1 irectors
County Sanitation District No.U
Orange County,California
-1—
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
ss
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I,ORA MAE MERRITT,Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Saritation Uistrict No.11 of Orange County,California)
do her’~by certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed and
adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No.11 of Orange County,California,held on
the 22nd day of October
,1952 by the following roil.c311 v(~e~
AYES:Directors Willis H.Warner,Vernon E.Langenbeck
and Roy Seabridge
NOES:None
ABSENT.:None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
seal of County Sanitation District No.11 of Orange County,California.
this 22nd day of October ,1952.
Secretary,Board of Directbrs
County Sanitation L~istrict No.11
Orange County,California
—2 —