Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDistrict 11 Minutes 1952-10-22MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11 ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA October 22~1952 at 8:00 p.m. Room 239,110i4.West Eighth Street Santa Ana,California The Board of Directors met in regular session at the hour of 3:00 p.m.,October 22,1952 in Room 239 at 11OL1.tJest Highth Street, Santa Ama,California. Chainiian Finch called hhe joint r~.eetin~~of the Districts’ Boards to order at 8:00 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board to be present. Directors present:Willis H.Warner (Chairman) Vernon E.Langenbeck Roy Seabridge Directors absent:None Others Present:Raymond II.Ribal,Chief Erw4neer and General Manager C.Arthur ~isson,Jr. Harry Ashton John A~Carollo j.A.~ooiiey ic.j.iarrison Ra;ynond ~:crtel I’Jai her .T~a~isey .~cenneth r>erry Walter Chaffee Ora Mae Merritt,Secretary Approval of The Boards of Directors of’County Sani Minut~tation Districts Mos.1,2,3,5,7 an~ 11 took the following action: Moved by Director willis H.Warner,seconded by Director Willia~iH.Hirstein and duly carried: That the minutes of the meetin~s held on October 1 and October ~,l~52 be approved as mailed out. -1— ~74 Joint_Adriin~s~The Boa~rds of Directors of County trativeWarz~ant Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6, Rister 7 and 11 too~c the fo11owin~action: — Moved by ~ireqtor Hugh W.‘garden,seconded by DirecLor William H.1-lirstein a~ic3.duly ca~riod; That the Joint Adriinietrativo ~arrant Register be approve for signature and payment of: War rant Demand No.In Favor Of _____ JA—L~O3 Davis Stationers 1.68 L~0L~Dennis Printers 15.31 L~05 Kleen-Line Corporation 3.52 L~06 Standard Oil Company of California 32.75 L107 F.R.Harwood,Postmaster 30.00 83.26 Correspondence, Connuni c at~io ns and reports filed 1.Quarz;erly ireii~The Secretary reported receipt of certi fied quarterly audit report from the firm of .LDehi and Company,and read balances of each Districtst funds, A notion was made by Director ~iilis H.Warner seconded by Director Vernon E.Lan~enbeck and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Seaii.tation Dis.~ricts Nos.1,2, 3,5,6,7,8 and 11: That tLLe audit report for the quarter ending September 30,1952,received fror~i Diehl and Company he received and ordered filed. 2.Vacation request The Secretary read.a letter from Nary E.Glllisn:io,stenographer in the offic~ of the Joint Adriiriis tro~tive orCanizabion requesting paid vacation. The Boards of Directors took the following action: hoved by Director Nelson N.Law-icr,seconded by Director Vincent L.Humeston and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,6 and 11: That Nary E.Gillispie erirloyed by the Districts as Senior Stenographer—Clerk in.the Joint Administrative Orge.nization,he and she is hereby authorized to take a vacation with pay heginnin~November 10,1952 to and in— cluding November 21,1952, Report of the Director Robert H.Boney,Chairman ~ro Execut~vo Committee ton of the Executive Committee reported upor the meeting held on October 17, 1952,as follows: Amount -2— ~75 l~Relative to the BoardsT request fqr recorwiendation upon filling the vacancy created by th~resignation of the Chief Er~gineer and General Manager,the Co~mittee reviewed the nan~factors facing the Districts in establishing sound adminis tratiori and or~r~iz~tjon of the joint Districts! program.~e~at~on of qu~1~ications of men who had applied ~the posit~pn,the Corit~ittee unanimously reco:cnriended the employrient of Mr.Le~N.Nelson as Chief Engineer and General Manager upon a trial basis at the monthly salary of ~l,OOO.OO per month,and that regular empioyi:ient and amount of salary be determined by mutual agreement between the Districts and Mr.Nelson within a period not to exceed six months,hr.Boney reported the Committee had been advised by Mr.Nelson that if the Districts desired his services,he could report for duty about ~ve~Ther 1st, Director honey stated that i”u~~Nelson had previously been interviewed by a three man Conm:Lttee comprised of Director Warner,Director Warden and :~oimer Director Reed.Director Warner was called upon for further information as to the background of Mr.Nelson. Director Warner reported that at the tine Mr.Nelson appeared before the Gommittee he was employed by the City of Rochester,Minnesota as Chief of the Utilities Commission. that he is a registered civil and electrical engineer and has now gone into private consulting work.Director Marner stated that Mr.Nclson enjoys a wide reputation as a vary able man,oven teripered and witb.the ability to work with and.rot along with people in very complex situations;that his qualifications would well fit h:im for the position now open where there will be a voiu~io of administrative work tlio Manager will be called upon to carry out. 2.Chairman Boney reported that the Committee had held over the business of making a recoon.dation on the requested annexation bo County Sanitation District No.3,until all information would be available and a report received from the J.0.S. Enplo~ment of The Boards of Directors took the Chief Engineer folio win;action: and General Manager Novoci hj Director 3 L McBride, seconded by Director ~n B.Haibor and duly carried by the hoards of Directors of County Sani tation Districts Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and 11: That the report of the Executive Committee be approved and accepted;and that Mr.Leo N,Nelson be and•~rie is hereby employed as Chief Engineer and General Manager for County Sanitation Districts Mos.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and II unon a trial basis at the monthly salary of ~1,00O.00 per month,effective November 1,1952;and that regular employ ment and amount of salary be determined by mutual agreement between the Districts and.~ir,:;Tclson within a period not ~exct~od six months, Director C.N.Nelson,Cha~man of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.6 stated that inasmuch as Mr.Lee H.Nelson is his cousin,he believed it to be only ethical to sever his connections with the Districts and that he would resign as a rieriber of the Board of Ms District, -3— Report of the D~rec~or Warner,Chairman of the Finance Cor~iittbe Finance Commi~tee reported that the Committee had been working upon the agreement wit1~the engineers;but,since the last meeting,business affairs of members of the Co~iittee had made it impossibJ~o to hold very many n~etings together for the purpose of studying d~,s of the contract,and as they felt this should he given very c~refi~l ~onsideration and a draft of the contract prepared and mailed to the Directors ahead of the joint meeting of the Boards,the Committee recommended that their report be hold over and made a special matter of business at the regular meeting of the Boards on November 12,1952;that previous to this meetin~,the Comriittee could have the contract prepared in detail and sent to tJ.le Directors. The Boards of Directors took the following action: iloved by Director Nelson N.Launer,seconded by Director Norman U.Miller and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 1l~ That tile report of the Finance Committee be approved and accepted. ______ Director Boney requested that the ________ offjcjsl action of the Executive Corunittee relative to employment ______________ of legal counsel for the Districts be read from the minutes of the meeting of the Executive Committee;and that bhe resolution authorizing employment of Mr.Nisson be read. At th.c request of the Chairman,the Secretary read the following excerpt from the minutes of the meeting of the Executive Committee held on October 3~1952: Robert U.Boney (Chairman) Thomas J.Radington,alternate ~or Nr.Hugh ~J,~Jarden J.L.McBride,alternate for Mr.Courtney H.Chandler Braden Finch C.N.Nelson Vincent L.Flurieston Others present:Raymond R,Ribal B,J.Marks K.J.Harrison Ora Mae Merritt,Secretary After a full discussion upon the employment of an attorney for the Districts,a motion was made,duly seconded and carried,that recommendation be xiade to the Districts’Boards that C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.be employed as the attorney for the Districts at the rate of ~355.OO per month,providing Mr.Nisson “terminates his employment as the City Attorney for Tustin.” The Secretary read Resolution No.93,authorizing employ ment of C.Arthur Nissori,Jr.as legal counsel for the Joint Adriln— istrative Organization of the eight County Sanitation Districts, adopted by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts, Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11 on October 10,1951.This resolutioi was carried in full in the condensed minutes of the meeting of October 10,1951 which were approved by the Boards on October 2L~, 1951. Business held over: re:clarification of terms of employ ment of 1o~1 ~our~sel Directors present: -.Li.— 177 Tho Chainnan called upon Mp,Niason for a report upon the terms of his enployment.Mr.Nisson reported that ha had no knowledge of the Exocutive Cornittoa minutes and that he had not boon asked by anyone to agree to tonus of enploynent other than those contained in Resolution No.98;that if the Boards desired his enploynont to be based upon tho terms contained in the Execu tivu Corwtittoe minutes,k~e wou]4 then ropoi’~his decision. There followed a fufl discussion by the Directors as to whether or not there night be a conflict in services perforned by the logal counsel in serving a city and the Districts. The Boards of Directors took the following action: Novod by Director Milford ti.Dahl,seconded by Diroctor Hugh W.‘Jardon: That Mr.Nisson’s onploynent as Legal Counsel for the Districts bo continued in accordance with Resolution No.98,adopto by the Boards of Directors of County Sa.sibation Districts Nos.1,2, 3,5,6,7,8 and 11 on October 10,1952. Director Boney spoke to the notion,stating that at the tine tho Corwiitteo.reconnonded Mr.Nisson’s enploynont,nanes of other attorneys prosonted to the Connittoe wore elininated from consideration because they were attornoys for cities within the Districts;and that hr.Nisson’s name was considered only because they wure intonnod he would resign as the attorney for the City of Tustin if appointod legal counsel for the Districts. •Director Lan;enbeck stated that ho had been aware of the fact that Mr.Nisson had not resigned as attorney for Tustin,but realized that it is difficult for a city to appoint an attorney upon short notice and that be had not raised the question as to the terns of’Hr.Nisson’s employment until the city had had sufficient tine to appoint a successor to Hr,Nisson. Mr.Nisson stated that if tho najority of the Boards desired that ho make a deoision to continue his employment in accordance with the reconnendations contained in the minutes of the Executivo Conrnitto&s noeting,he would offer his resignation as lesal counsel to the Districts,offective as of Octobur 31,1952 The Chairman called for roll call vote upon the notion: The vote was polled by roll call vote by Districts and the Secretary reported the notion lost by the following vote:. BOARD OF DIRi~XJTORS DISTRICT NO.1 Ayes:Directors hilford W.Dahl,and J.L. McBride Noes:Director Wiflis H.Warner Absent:None BOARD OF DIRi!~CWRS DISTRICT IV 2 ___ Ayes:Directors Hugh If.Warden and Charles E.Stevens Noes:Directors Robert H.Boney,Don B. Haibor,Willis H.Warner and William H.Birstein Absent:Director Frank J.Schweitzer,Jr. -5.. BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT MC 3 -— ~yes;i~i~ector~Hugh N.Warden,Nelson H.La1~nor,C.R.Miller and Joseph Webbor Noes:Dj~ector Willis H.~arnor Absent:None HOARD OF DI~b~CTOr~S D1STRICT NO.S Ayes~None ____— Noes;Directors Bradon Finch,Nornan H.Miller and Willis H.Warner Absent:None BOARD OF ~i RECTORS DISTRICT MC.6 Ayes:None Noes:Directors C.H.Nelson,Willis n. Warner ar.td Norman H.Miller Absoilt:None BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.7 Ayes:Directors Vl.lcent L.Hurieston and J.L.McBride Noes :Director Willis H.Warner Absent:None HOARD OF D1NfCTQBS DISfRICT ~o.B Ayes:Director Harold B.Edwards - Noes:Director Willis H.Warner Absent:Director John H.Cropper BOARD OF DIR.S~TOHS DISTRICT_HO.11 Ayes:None Noes:Directors Willis H.Warner, Vcri:ion B.Langenbock and Roy Seabridge Absent:None After announcement.of the vote,the Chairman requested the legal counsel to state t;ho mb as to the status of a tie vote.hr,}:Jisson reported that in the event of a tie vote,the motion would be lost. Mr.Nisson offered his ros~nation as legal counsel for the Districts,to become effective October 31,1952. The Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director Willis H.Warner,seconded.by Director Vernon B.Langenbcck: That tb.c resignation of I”ir.C.Arthur NiSsofl,as legal counse1 for the Distric 1s,be accepted,offoetivu as of October 31,1952, The vote was polled by roll call vote by .Distr:Lcts and the Secretary reported the notion lost by the followin.g vote: BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT ‘\O 1 ~yos Dirucbor ~J~lii&H Jarncx _________- Noes:Directors J.B.McBride and Hilford N.Dahl Absent:None BOARD.Cf DIFJ~CTOflS DISTRICT NO • 2 Ayes:Directors Robert H.Honey,Don H. 1-~aahor, Will is H.Jarner and wi:Lli~~H.1-lirstein Noes:Directors HUg1~b.1~rden and Charles H.Stevens Absent:Director Frank J.Schwoitzer,Jr. :~79 Ayc~:J~irootor Willis H.Warner Noes:Directors Hugh W.Warden,Nelson N. Launer,C.H.Miller and Joseph Web ucr Absent:None _______ Ayes;Directors Bradon Finch,Nor~nan i-i. Miller and Willis H.Warner Noes:None Absent:None _________ Directors C.N.Nelson,Bradon Finch and Willis H.~Iarrior BOARD O~DIRROTORS DISTRICT NO.7 Ayes:Director Willis H.Warner Noes:Directors Vincent L.Huiicston and J.L.McPride Absent:None BOARD OF D:{P OTOHS DISTRICT NO • 8 _____ Ayes:Directors Willis H.Warner,Vernon B,Lanr~onheck and Roy Seabridgo Noes :1~OflO Absent:None _____ Director Warner led a discussion or ____________ the notion passed by the Boards on ____ October ~i,1952,which would tcrr~— _____ mate the Districts!eraployoes as ______ of Novcr~ber 1,1952 and provided for vacation connonsurate with ~Jarnor stated that the E~ecutive :e~otion and the effect it would have upon the con~ietion of District hoe.1 and 6 lines,and offered the suggesi;ion that the Districts’cniployeos he retained until the arrival of Hr.Lee N.Nelson for his deternaination as to the temnaination c1ato of the ersploycos whose services would no longer be needed;and that the previous r.rotion be rescinded and another passed by tiie Boards specifically setting forth a method for computing paid terminal vacations,recommending that such a formula follow as nearly as possible the County1 s policy of granting paid vacation to per diem employees,except that no terminal vacation be given unless the employee had worked for three nrionths or longer in the service of ti-ic Districts After a gcr.~oral discussion,the Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director J.L.McBride,seconded by Director Roy Soabridge and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of Count~y Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11: BOARD OP DIR~CTQRS BOARD OF :oIffCcToRS DISTRI CT NO.5 BOARD OF ~IRBCToRS DISTRICT NO 6 Ayes: Noes:None Absent:None Ayes: Noes: Absent: BOARD OF D:RECTORS DISTRICT_NO •11 Director Willis H.Warner .Uir~ctor harold N.Edwards Director John H.Cropper Clarification of previous action _____ relative to term ____ ination of O~fOOS on Octo2 length of service,Director Cornnittoo had reviewed,this ‘-7— Y 00 That the following motion adopted by the Boards of Directors on October ~,1952: “That the present employees of iho joint Districts be retained until November 1,1952 and that they be given vacatio: comricnsurato with the length of c~iployrient,based upon two weeks per year.” be and the ssrie is hereby rescinded. Authorizing paid The Boards of Directors took the terminal vacat13n~following action: Moved by Director Hugh ~f.~fardon.,seconded by Director Joseph ~Jebbor and duly carried ~Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Kos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11: That tonelnal vacations for employees involuntarily loavin~ the scrvlccs of the Districts after October 31,1952 be calcu— lated on the basis of one day’s paid vacation for each 20 days worked;that said temin.al vacation pay be paid from the fund or funds that the omployoe~s salary has been charged to during the course of his employment in the same ratio of past payment, and that 21 working days per month be used for computing daily rates of pay. The Chair recognized hr.Kenneth Ferry,employed by the Districts as Assistant Engineer,hr.Ferry,requested the Dis tricts’consideration of two weeks’advance notice for employees being involuntarily released from their employmon with the Districts. The Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director Roy Seabridr~o,seconded by Director Vornc E.Langenheck and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11: That two weeks’advance notice be given each employee before severance oi eriploynont by the Dis bricts. NE~BUSINESS 1.Reaffirmation of Director Bonoy requested the contracG with Boards?consideration of roaffir— Mealy Tibbitis mdng the contract with Hoaly Company ________ Tibbitts company for the con struction of the marine section of the ocean outfall to the full 7,000 feet;stating that the tine limit for reaffirmation would expire on November 3,1952. After a general discussion,the Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No.231,dotormining the length of the ocean outfall sewer (marine section)and directing County Sanitation District No.1 to so oroceod with the constnic— tion,Certified copies of this Resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. 1 2.Extension of time Chairman Finch reported that the 30-day for_su~iission~T extension of tine for submission of fina~plans and plans and specifications agreed upon by specifications the Districts and the design engineers would expire November 1,1952.The Boards of Directors took the followin~action: Moved by Director Willis El.~‘iarnor,seconded by Director Robert H.Boney and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and ii: That the Boards of Directors hereby request the privi— logo of holding in abeyance work on the plans and speci fications for an additional 15 days from October 30,1952, the expiration date of work suspension requested by the Boards on October 1,1952 and granted by the engineers on that date;and that the time for completion of plans and specifications by the design en~incers be extended 15 days. Mr.John A.Carollo,representing the design engineers, approved and agreed to the exto~1sion requested by the Boards. 3.Pr~sed Review Director Vincent L.Humeston proposed, of estthatos~y as a method of expediting the business, a_consu1tii~.g of the Districts and in the interest engineerin~fii’m of positive determination that the bond fundo available are insufficient to construct the joint facilities under the original bond proposal plan that a consultir,g engineering firm be employed to review the estimates. The Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director Vincent L.1-lurieston,seconded by Director Milford W.Dahi: That the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County employ a reputable engineerin~firm to review the current status of the hon.d engineer’s plan to determine whether or not the proposed modification recommended by the Finance Committee will best serve the eocds of the Districts in relation ~the bond plan. The Chairman called for discussion of the motion and Director Warner expressed the opinion that a notion for employment should state terms and conditions and author~ ization for payment of services rendered;and recommended that the notion include instructions for securing proposals from consulting engineering firms as the basis of payment. Director Warner offered a substitute notion for consider at:Lon,and with the consent of the mover and the seconder the following motion was substituted for the original motion, and was duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts NOS.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11: That Directors Hunoston and Warden ho designated as a Committee of two and that they be instructed to secure a definite proposal from some competent engineering firm for services they deem necessary in the review of the bond plan and the modification plan and thet the Committee so dosig— •nated report back to the Boards at the earliest possible time b —9- Li..Availability of A discussion.~as hold upon the possibility ~of calling for bids under the bond proposal plans for usc in plan.hr.John A.Carollo reported that all calling for bids plans and specifications under the bond proposal plan,o~ccopting the treatment plant,wore ~iow comiDioto and available and that the treat ment plant nians and specifications were 6O~complete,and sug,~ostod that the Boards consider calling for bids on the completed plans in order to detunuinc the amount of funds then ava:ilablc for the treatment plant.Director Warner roq.uos tad hr.Ribal’s opinion on the rocoiinondation of Mr. Garollo.Mr.Ribal stated that he had always held that bids should be called for and concurred in this procedure to doterPl:Lno costs;but that ho could see nothing wrong with the review as suggested by Mr.Rurieston. The Boards of Directors took the following action~ i’Iovud by Director Willis H.Warner,seconded by Director Norman H.Miller anc1.duly carried by the Boards of D~roctors of County Sanitetion Districts Nos.1,2,3, 5,6,7 and 11: That the design engineers be requested to present plans and specifications for ti~ic ~ushard Street Trunk and Treatment Plant Trunk Sewers to the Districts before the next meeting of the Boards,on October 29,1952. Hr.E~ihal stated that ho had reviewed the plans and specifications on the Ellis Av.~nue Trunk Sower and rocori— mended correlation,of certain items in the specifications; and.,at the request of Director 1~aibor,itemized the correlations which ho stated to he of dimensional nature. Report of the Chief Mr.Rihal road.his report and recom— Engineer dc~~1 riondations to t}’~e i)ircctors.This report ______- is on file ifl.the off ice of the Secretary. _______—-‘~ The Boards of iiiroct,ors took the following action upon the recommendations contained in the written report of the Chief En~inccr and General Manager: 1.Authorizing Raymond A motion was bade by Director Willis H. M.Hortol o sign Warner,seconded by Director Roy Soabridgo certain papers and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos,1,2, 3,5,6,7,3 a1~d 11:. T~iat Raymond M.Hortel,e:~Dloycd as Supervising Engineer by the joint County Sanitation Districts,be and heis hereby authorized to aoprovc time cards,sign the pa~jro1l and warrant deriancie,cign letters requesting the County Auditor to transfer such funds as nay be necessary for the pajmcnt of obligations,oversee the work now under consGruct:Lon,certify progress pcç~uonts,prepare and sign engineer’s certificates and L.s bir~atos during the tin.o that Raynond H,Hibal,Chief Engineur and General hianagor is on vaoat.~on and until such time no Mr.Ribal’s successor arrives. -10 — A motion was made by Dirictor Willis H.Warrior,seconded by Director J~L. HeBrido and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanita~ion Districts Nose l,2~ 3,~,6,7,and 11: That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 hereby authorize Ra~auorid M.Hortol,Suporvisin~Engineer,to fill tho vacanc~ created by the resi~riatier~of Carl S.Starnos,by employing Jack R.~hiimer as engineering aide at the salary of ~3O3.OO per month for the period October 27th to October 31,1952, Inc lus :i.vci• ______ Thu Chairman called upon Mr.Ribal ____ for a report upon the adequacy of thc _________ staff of the Districts to perform thL _____ preliminary engineering work when construction work is started on the _______ ocean outfall.Mr.Ribal reported •ttiet the present survey crow would bL enga~ed on the work now under construction for Districts Nos.1 and 6,and that tbuee would he a need for a survey crew r nre1ininar~y work on Uho ocean outfall sewer. A notion was node by Director Willis H.Warner, seconded by D:Lrector C.H.Hillor and duly carried by the Boards of ~irectors of County San:i.tation Districts Nos.1, 2,3,5,6,7 and ii: That the Boards of Dirccthrs of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 hereby ask the desii~n engthc~rs to perform the gence:’ai supervision on constructio5.. of the marine section of the ocean outfall sower,under the terms of their contract,and that they supervise the necessary preliminary ong~ncL;ring work as a courtesy to the Districts;and that the design engineers,Harrison &Woolley and Headman,Ferguson &Carello,he paid by the County Sanitat:Lon Districts for the fluid party required for this work while the final contract ~oth them is being worked out. hr.Harrison,rep resent in:blie design engineers,stated that they were ~ri:L:Ling to grant the i~iquus b of the Districts for the porfo rna~:~cu oi services reqieLr~~d. Adjournment The Boards of •~irec bars took the ______— i’oliomin~action: It~ovod by Director t~oy Soabridge,seconded by Director Charles H.htuvens and duly carried: That this meeting be adjourned to the hour of 8:00 p.m.,on October 29,1952 in Room 239 at lloL1.West Li~iith Stru.~t,Santa Ana,California. 1ihcreupon,the Chain~au declared the meeting so adlournod at 10:20 n .11. 2.Authorizing enplo~iui~ of Jack H.Wuii~u~ Authori zing Harrison &Woolley ot ol to supervise the preliminary wo±~k ~t:~~~ff~Tn: sower —ii — ~‘1 _~-~2 Chairman,Board of Directors County Sanitation Distric~No.11 Oran~c County,California ATTEST: ~cro ary,Poara of Diroctors County Sanitation District No.11 Oran~o County,California —12 — ~85 RESOLUTION NO.231-11 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,DETERMINING THE LENGTH OF THE OCEAN OUTFALL SEUER (MARI1\TE SECTION)AHD DIRECTING COUNTY SANITATION DISTHIC11 NO.1 OF ORANGE COUNTY TO SO PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION.. WHEREAS:County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 of Orange County,California by Resolution 206 dated August 6,1952,directed said District No.1 to award a contract to Healy Tibbitts Construction Company for the construction of the Ocean Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)and WHEREAS:said award of contract was made on the condition the the length of the outfall be confirmed within sixty (60)days from the date of the contract,and WHEREAS:said sixty (60)day period will expire on November 3 1952,now therefore,be it RESOLVED:that County Sanitation District No.11 of Orange County,California does hereby find &nd deten~ine that the Ocean Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)be cdnstructed to Station 70 /00 a~: shown on the plans and specifications therefor adopted by Resolutio No.l7Lj-11 of the Board of Directors of last said District. FURTHER RESOLVED:that County Sanitation District No.1 of Orange County,California acting as Contracting Agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos.2,3,5,6,7 and 11 be and i~’ hereby directed to reaffirm the provision of the contract with the Healy Tibbitts Construction Company;that the Ocean Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)be constniicted to Station 70 /00 as hereinabove referred to. The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District Mo.11 on the 22nd day of October,1952 Secreatry,Board 01 1 irectors County Sanitation District No.U Orange County,California -1— STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ss COUNTY OF ORANGE I,ORA MAE MERRITT,Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Saritation Uistrict No.11 of Orange County,California) do her’~by certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.11 of Orange County,California,held on the 22nd day of October ,1952 by the following roil.c311 v(~e~ AYES:Directors Willis H.Warner,Vernon E.Langenbeck and Roy Seabridge NOES:None ABSENT.:None IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of County Sanitation District No.11 of Orange County,California. this 22nd day of October ,1952. Secretary,Board of Directbrs County Sanitation L~istrict No.11 Orange County,California —2 —