Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDistrict 07 Minutes 1952-10-22T MINUTES CF REGULAR ~ETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SAN I TAT I ON DISTRICT NO.7 ORANGE COUNTY,CALl i~OflNIA October 22,l9~2 at 8:00 p.m. Room 239,liOL~West Eighth Street Santa Ana,California The Board of Directors met in regular session at the hour of 8:00 p.m.,October 22,19S2 th R~on 239 at iiOL1.West High.th Street, Santa Ana,California. Chaii~ian Ninch called the joint meeting of the Districts’ Boards to order at 8:00 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board to he iresent. Directors present:Vincent L.Humeston (Chairman) Willis H.Warner Norman H.Miller Directors absent:None Others Present:Nayriond N.Ribal,Chief Engineer and General Manager C.Arthur Nissan,Jr. Harry Ashton John A~Carollo J.A.Woolley i~•j.-jarrison Nayriond ~1ortel lJ~Lter Ra~sey lenneth •i~~erry Walter Cbaffee Ora Mae ~ierritt,Secretary Approval of The Boards of Directors of County Sani Minutes tation Districts Nos,1,2,3,~,7 an~ 11 took the following action: Moved by Director Willis H.Namer,seconded by Director Willia~i H.hirstein and duly carried: That the minutes of the i~eet~n~,s held on October 1 and October 8,l9~2 be approved as nailed out. -1-’ ____ The Boards of Directors of County ____ Sanitatio~i Districts Nos.l,2,3,~,6, __________ 7 and.1].took the following action: Moved by Director Hugh W.iarden,seconded by Director William H.Hirstein ~in.d duLy carried; That the Joint Administrative ~varrant Register be approve for signature and payment of: War rant Demand No.In Favor Of _____ JA-14~O3 Davis Stationers 1.68 L~OLj.Dennis Printers 1~.3l Klecn-Line Corporation 3.52 L~o6 Stai~dard Oil Company of California 32.7~ L107 F.R.Harwood,Postn.asber 30.00 83.2 Correspondence, Conriunicat :~.ons and_reports filed 1.cD~uarec::.ly ~a~dit The Secretary reported receipt of certi fied anartenly audit report from the firm of .Diehl and Company,and read balances of each Districts t funds. A motion was made by Director iiilis H.Warner seconded by Director Vernon E.I,1angeribcck and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sath.tation Districts Nos.1,2, 3,~,6,7,8 and 11: That the audit report for the quarter ending September 30,l9~2,received fror’i Diehl and Company be received and ordered filed. 2.Vacation request The Secretary read a letter from Mary B.Gillisnia,stenographer in the offic~ of the Joi~i~AcJriJ.n.istrative organizabion requesting paid vacation. The Boards of Diroctors took the following action: Moved by Director Nelson N.Banner,seconded by Director Vincent B.Humeston and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,3 and 11: That ~:Jary B.Gillispie eriï’1loyed by the Districts as Senior Stenographer—Clerk in.the Joint Administrative Organization,be and she is hereby authorized to take a vacation with pay beginning November 10,1952 to and in cluding ~Iovember 21,1952. Report of the Director Robert H.Boney,Chairman nro Exe~ti.ve Conrattee ten of the fxecutive Committee reported upon the meeting held on October 17, 1952,as follows: Joint Adminis trative_Warrant~ Register ~75 Amount 17G 1.Relative to the Boards’request fqr recommendation upon filling the vacancy created by thp resignation.of the Chief Ei-~gin~or and General Manager,the Committee reviewed the rian~factors facin~the Districts in establishing sound administration and organization of the joint Districts’ program.~I~’bç~’~s~de~iatiron of qu~J4!ications of men who had applied ~or the posit~pn,the Corir.~iittee unanimously reco:~niended the employment of hr.Lee N,Nelson as Chief Engineer and General Manager upon a tr~ai basis at the monthly salary of ~1,OOO.OO per month,and that regular employment and amount of salary be determined by mutual agreement between the Districts and Mr.Nelson within a period nob •bo exceed six months.hr.Boney reported the Committee had been advised b~hr.Nelson that if the Districts desired his services,he could report for duty about hove:’:ibcr 1st1 Director honey stated that Mr•Nelson had previously been interviewed by a three man Committee comprised of Director Warner,Director Warden and ~~omor Director Reed.Director Warner was called upon for further information as to the background of Mr.Nelson. Director Warner reported that at the tine Mr.Nelson appeared before the Committee he was employed by the City of Rochester,Minnesota as Chief of the Utilities Commission, that he is a registered civil and electrical engineer and has now gone into private consulting work.Director ~Jarner stated that Mr.Nelson enjoys a wide reputation as a very able man,oven tempered and with the ability to work with and.r~ot along with people in very complex situations;that his qualifications would well Cit him for the position now open whore there will be a volemo of administrative work the Manager will be called unon to carry out. 2.Chairman Boney reporbed that the Committee had held over the business of making a recommendation on the requested annexation to County Sanitation District No.3,until all information would be available and a report received froh the J.0.S. Employment of The Boards of Directors took the Chief En~ineer following action: and General 1~anager Moved by Director J.L.McBride, _______—- seconded by 1)irector Don B.Haiber and duly carried by the hoards of Directors of County Sani tation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11: That the report of the Executive Committee be approved and accepted;and that Mr.Leo N.Nelson be and he is hereby employed as Chief Engineer and General Manager for County Sanitation Districts ~os.1,2,3,5,,6,7,8 and 11 uuon a trial basis at the monthly salary of ~1,0OO.0O per month,effective November 1,1952;and that regular employ ment and amount of salary be determined by mutual agreement between the Districts and.hr.Molson within a period not to exceed six months. Director C.N.Nelson,Cha~man of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.6 stated that inasmuch as Mr.Leo N.Nelson is his cousin,he believed it to he only ethical to sever his connections with the Districts and that he would resign as a rler1ber of the Board of his District. -3— ~7T Report of the Director W~irner,Chairman of the Finance CommItt~e FinaneQ Co~w4ttee reported that the Committee had been working upon the agreement wit1-~the engineers;but.,since the last meeting,business affairs of members of the Committee had made it impossible to hold very many rneetings together for the purpose of studying d~~ls of the contract,and as they felt this should be given very careful ~onsideration and a draft of the contract prepared and mailed to the Directors ahead of the joint meeting of the Boards,the Committee recommended that their report be held over and made a special matter of business at the regular nesting of the Boards on November 12,l9~2;that previous to this meeting,the Conm:~ttee could have the contract prepared in detail and sent to the Directors. The Boards of Directors tooJ~the following action: f-loved by Director Nelson N.Launer,seconded by Director Norman H.Miller and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7 and 1l~ That the report of the Finance Committee be approved and acc opted. _____ Director Burley requested that the _________ officiol action of the Executive Committee relative to employment __________ of legal counsel for the Districts ho read from thu minutes of the meeting of the Executive Committee;and that the resolution authorizing employment of Mr.Nisson be read. At the request of the Chairman,the Secretary road the fo11owin~excerpt from the minutes of the meeting of the Executive Committee held on October 3,19~2: Robert fT.Boney (Chairman) Thomas J.I~adington,alternate Lor Mr.Hugh 1•~iarden J.L.McBride,alternate for fIr.Courtney R.Chandler Bradon Finch C.M.Nelson Vincent L.Hurieston Others present:Raymond R.Ribal B.J.Marks K.J.Harrison Ora Mao Merritt,Secretary After a full discussion uron the employment of an attorney for the Districts,a notion was made,duly seconded and carried,that recommendation be made to the Districts’Boards that C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.be e~ip1oyed as the attorney for the Districts at the rate of ~3~5.OO per month,providing Mr.Nisson “terminates his employment as the City Attorney for Tustin.” The Secretary read Resolution No.90,authorizing employ ment of C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.as legal counsel for the Joint Admin istrative Organization of the eight County Sanitation Districts, adopted by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts, Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and 11 on October 10,l9~1.This resolutior was carried in full in the condensed minutes of the meeting of October 10,l9~i which were approved by the Boards on October 2L3, i9~1. Business hold over: re:clarification of terms of employ— riont of legal counsel Directors present: 178 The Chairman ealled upqn Mr Nisson for a report upon the terms of his enploynent.Mr Nisson reported that he had no knowledge of the Exocutive Corriittoe ninutes and that he had not boen asked by anyone to agree to terms of enploynont other than those contained in Resolution No.98;that if the Boards desired his enploynent to be basod upon the terms contained in the Exocu tive Comnittco ninubes~he would then report his decision. There followed a full discussion by the Directors as to whether or not there night be a conflict in services performed by the legal counsel in serving a city and the Districts. Tiio Boards of Dirootors took the following action: I’iovod by Director Milford 11.Dahl,seconded by Director Hugh ti.Warden: That 14r.Nisson’s onploynent as Legal Counsel for the Districts bo confirmed in accordance with Resolution No.98,adopto by the Boards of Directors of County Sa.iitation Districts Nos.1,2: 3,5,6,7,8 and 11 on October 10,1952. Director Boney spoke to the notion,stating that at the time the Comnittee recorinonded Mr.Fisson’s enploynent,nanes of other attornoys presontod to the Connittoo wore elininated from consideration bocause they were attorneys for cities within the Districts;and that hr.~j5~~n~5 name was considered only because they wore informed he would resign as the attorney for the City of Tustin if appointed legal counsel for the Districts. Director Lari;enbeck stated that ho had been aware of the fact that Mr.)Tisson had not resignod as attorney for Tustin,but rOaliz3d that it is difficult for a city to appoint an attorney upon short notice and that he had not raised the question as to tij.o terms of Mr.Nisson’s onploynent until the city had had sufficient tine to appoint a successor to Mr.Nisson. Mr.Nisson stated that if trio majority of the Boards desired that ho make a decision to continue his employment in accordance with tho reconnendations contained in the minutes of the Exucutivo Connitteots meeting,he would offer his resignation as legal counsel to the Districts,offective as of Octobar 31,1952. The Chairman called for roll call vote upon the notion: The veto was polled by roll call vote by Districts and the Secretary reported the notion lost by tile following vote: BOARD 01”DIR~CT0RS DISTRICT NO.l Ayes:Directors Milford W.Dahl,and J.L. r — McBride Noes:Director Wiflis H.Warner Absent:None BOARD OF DI&CWRS DISTRICT ?0 2 ___ Ayes:Directors Hugh W.Warden and Charles IL Stevens Noes:Direotors Robert H.Boney,Don B. Haibor,Willis H.Warner and William H.flirstein Absent:Director Frank 3.Schweitzer,Jr. _5.. :rTg BOAFfl~OF DIRECTOF~S DISTRICT NO 3 - ayes;D~ectors Hugh N.Warden,Nelson M.Launor,C.R.Miller and Joseph Nob bar Noes:Director Willis H.i~arner Absent:None HOARD OF DIR~CTOb~S DISTRICT NO.~Ayes:None Noes:~iroctors Bradon Finch,Norman H.Miller and Willis H.Warner Absent:None BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT 110.6 Ayes:None Noes:Directors C.M.Nelson,Willis ~i. 1.:Jarflor and Norman H.Miller Absent:None BOARD OF DIR:ocToRs DISTRICT 10.7 Ayes:Directors Vincent H.Hurieston and J.H,~Ici3ride Noes:Director Willis H.Warner Absent:None HOARD OF DIRECTORS DISfPIICT NC.8 Ayes:Director Harold E.Edwards - Noes:Director Willis H.Warner Absent:Director John R.Cropper HOARD OFDIREJTORS DISTRICTIlO.11 Ayes:None Noes:Directors Willis H.Warner, Vernon H.Langenbock and Roy S eabridgo Absent:None After announcement of the vote,the Chairman requested the legal counsel to state the rile as to the status of a tic vote,hr.Hissori reportcd that in the event of a tic vote,the motion would be lost. Mr.Nisson offered his rosi;~nation as legal counsel for the Districts,to h~COi~i~effectIve October 31,1952. The Boards of DIrectors took the following action: Moved by Director Willis H.Warner,seconded.b~y Director Vernon E.Langonbock: That tbe resignation of Mr.C.Arthur Nisson,as legal counsel for the Districts,be accepted,cffcctivc as of October 31,1952, The vote was polled by roll call vote by Districts and the Secretary reported the motion lost by•~following vote: fOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO 1 Ayes:Director Willis H.Warner Noes:Directors J.H.McBride and Milford N.Dahi Absent:None BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO • 2 Ayes:Directors Robert H.Honey,Don h. i:~aibcr,Will is H.Jarrier and wi:Lliau~i H.1-lirstein Noes:Directors Rugli ii.Warden and Charles E.Stevens Absent:Director Frank J.Schweitzer,Jr. / -a- :~C’0 ____ ]~iroctor Willis H.Warner Noes:Directors Hugh W.Warden,Nelsen H, Launer,C.R.Miller and Joseph Webb or Absent:None _______ Ayes:Directors Bradon Finch,Nor~iian H. Miller and Willis H.Warner NOeS:None Absent:None Ayes:Director Willis H.Warner Noes:Directors Vincent L.Hunoston and J.L.Mc.~ride Absent:None BOAIU)OF DIRHCTORS DISTRICT NO 8 ____ Ayes:Directors -1Jillis H.Warner,Vernon B.Lan~onhock and Roy Seabridgo Noes:None Absent:None ____ Director Warner led a discussion ox ___________ the motion passed by the Boards on October ~,l9~2,which would term _____ inate the Districts’employees as ______ of November 1,l9~2 and provided for vacation commensurate with harner stated that the E~cecutive notion and ~hc effect it would have upon the completion of District Moe.1 and 6 lines,and offered the suggestion that the Districts’employees he retained until the arrival of Mr.Leo N.Nelson for his determination as to the termination date of the employees whose services would no longer be needed;and that the previous motion be rescinded and another passed by the Boards specifically setting forth a method for computing paid toxninal vacations,rocomriendin~that such a formula follow as nearly as possible the County’s policy of ~vacation to per diem employees,except that no terminal,vacation be given unless the employee had worked for three morith:s or longer in the service of the Districts, After a general discussion,the Boards of Directors took the followLn~action: Moved by Director .1.L.McBride,seconded by Director Roy Seabrid~o and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of Counts Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and 11: BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.3 BOARD OF DI:RBCT0RS DISTRICT_MO.~ BOARD OF oIRBCTORS DISTRICT NO.6 E;OAR D 0?DIRBOTO RS DISTRICT NO.7 Ayes:Directors C.N.Nelson,Bradon Finch and Willis H.Warner Noes:None Absent:None Ayes: Noes: Absent: Director i~.Jillis H.Warner .U~iroctor harold H.Edwards Director John H.Cropper BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.11 Clarification of previous action _____ relative to term on Octohor31;19~2 length of service.Director Committee had reviewed.th.i~ -7— That the following motion adopted by the Boards of Directors on October 8,1952: “That the present employees of the joint Districts be retained until November 1,1952 and that they be given vacatioi coi~riensurato with the length ci’employment,based upon two weeks per year.” be and bEe ssi’ic is hereby rescinded. Authorizing paid The Boards of Directors took the terminal vacations followii]g,action: Moved by Director Hugh i.J•1:Jarcion,seconded by Director Joseph hebbor and duly carried by•~Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and 11: That terminal vacations for employees involuntarily lcavir~ the services of the Districts after October 31,1952 be calcu lated on the basis of one day’s :paid vacation for each 20 days worked;that said tominal vacation pay be paid from the fund or funds that the er~ployoe s salary has been charged to during the course of his employment in the ernie ratio of past payment, and that 21 working days per month be used for conput~ng daily rates of pay. The Chair recognized Mr.Kenneth Perry,employed by the Districts as Assistant Bnginccr.hr.Ferry,requested the DistrictsT consideration of two weeks’advance notice for employees being involuntarily released from their employmun with the Districts. The Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director Roy Soabridr~o,seconded by Director Vornc E.LanNonbock and duly carried by tlio Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11: That two i~O~k~’advance notice be given each employee before severance of employment by the Districts. ~:JE~BUSINESS 1.Reaffirmation of Director Bonoy requested the contract with Boards’consideration of roaffir— ridng the contract with Mealy Company _______ Tibbitts corleany for the con struction of the marine section of the ocean outfall to the full 7,000 foot;stat:Lng that the time limit for reaffirmation would expire on November 3,1952. After a general discussion,the Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No,231,determining th.o length of the ocean outfall sewer (marine section)and directing County Sanitation District No.1 to so eroceed with the construc tion,Certified copies of this Resolution is attached hereto and made a part of those minutes. -8— 2.Extension of time Chairman Finch reported that tho 30-day for submission of extension of time for submission of final_plans ~plans and specifications agreed upon by ~eciftc~36~the Districts and the design engineers would expire November 1,1952.The Boards of Directors took the followi~ag action: Moved by Director Willis H.Warner,seconded by Director flobort H.Boney and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Disbricts Has.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11: That the Boards of Directors hereby request the privi— logo of holding in abeyance work on the plans and speci fications for an additional 15 days from October 30,1952, the expiration date of work suspension requested by the Boards on October 1,1952 and granted by the engineers on that date;and that the time for completion of plans and specifications by the design un~rineors be extended 15 days. Mr.John A.Carollo,representing the design engineers, approved and agreed.to the extension requested by the Boards, 3.Proposed Review Director Vincent L.Humeston proposed, of estimates by as a method of expediting bhe business, a_consulting of th~Dist-ricts and in the interest onginecrin~f]rm of posltJvL deterrnnet~on that the - bond funds available are insufficient to construct the joint facilities under the original bond proosal plan that a consu1tiw~engineering fix~i be employed to revIew the estimates. The Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director Vincent L,Hurioston.,seconded by Director Milford W.Dahi: That the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County employ a reputahLo cngineer:in~firm to review the currant status of the bond engine ~a plan to determine whether or not the proposed modification recommended by the Finance Committee will host aorvL;the aeeds of the Districts in relation to the bond plan. The Chairman called for discussion of the motion and Director Warner expressed the opinion that a motion for employment should state terms arid conditions and author ization for payment of services rendered;and.recommended that the motion include instructions for securing proposals from consulting engineering firms as the basis of payment,. Director Warner offered a suhst:’tuto motion for consider ation,and with the consent of the mover and the seconder the following motion was substituted for the original motion, and was duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11: That Directors Hurieston and Warden be designated as a Committee of two and that they he instructed to secure a definite proposal from some competent engineering firm for services they deem necessary in the review of the bond plan and the modification plan and that the Committee so desig nated report back to the floards at the earliest possible time. -9- A discussion was held upon the possibility ____ of calling for bids under the bond proposal ___________ plan.Mr.John A.Carollo reported that all plans and specifications under the bond proposal plan,,cxcoptin~the troatmen~ plant,were now eQIlpiete and available and that the treat ment plenb plans and specifications wore 6O~complete,,and suggested that the Boards consider calling for bids on the completed plans in order to detonuine the amount of funds then available for the trcatrion~plant.Director Warner requested ?lr.Ribal’s opinion on the recommendation of Mr. Carollo,Mr.Ribal stated that he had always hold that bids should ho called for and concurred in this procedure to dcter~’i:Lno costs;but that ho could see nothing wrong with the rovi~w as suggested.by Mc.Humeston. The Boards of Directors took the following action~ ~‘:‘iovod by Director willis H.Warner,seconded by Director Norman H.Miller and.duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3, ~,6,7 and 11: That the design engineers ho requested to present plan.s and specifications for the ~3ushard Street Trunk and Treatment Plant Trunk Sewers to the Districts before the next meeting of the Boards,on October 29,l9~2. Hr.Rihal stated that ho had reviewed the plans and specifications on the Ellis Av.~nuo Trunk Sewer and rocom— mended correlation of certaln items in the specifications; and,at the request of Director ±iaibor,itemized th~ correlations which ho stated to be of dimensional nature. Mr.Ribal road his report and recom mendations to the Directors.This report ______- is on file ~the office of the Secretary. The Boards of Directors took the following action upon the reconrtondotions contained in the written report of the Chief Engineer a-nd General Manager: 1.Authorizing Raymond A motion was mode by Director Willis H. M.H~rtc1 to si~n Warner,seconded by Director Roy Soabridge certain pop~rs and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2, 3,5,6,73(3 a~d 11: That Raymond M.Hertol,employed as Supervising Engineer by the joint County Sanitation Districts,be and he is hereby authorized to approve tine cards,sign the payro.tJ.and warrant demands,a ign 1€tters reque s ting the County Aud:Ltor to transfer such funds as may ho necessary for the pajmorit of obligations,oversee the work now under eo~isiruction.,certify progress pa~ents,prepare and sign enr~inoerl s certificates and ~s timatos during the time that R~nonci H.Hibal,Chief Hn-~ino~r and General Manager is on vacation and until such tine as Hr.flibal’s successor err ives. -10 — L1..Avai).~ahility of bond 5~~T plans for use in calling for bids Report of the Chief Engineer and ~cnoral Manager L ____ A motion was made by Dirictor Willis H.Warner,seconded by Director J.L. McBride arid duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos,1,2., 3,5,6,7,and 11: That the Boards of Directors of County Sanibation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and.11 hereby authorize Raymond N.Hortol,Supervisin.c~~nginoor,to fill the vacanc; created by the resic~riation of Carl S.Starnes,by employing Jack R.~Ioi:mor as engineering aide at the salary of ~.303.0O per month for the period October 27th to October 31,1952, inclus ive. The Chairman called upon Mr.Rihal ____ for a report upon the adequacy of tilL _____ staff of the Districts to perform thL preliminary engineering work when _______ construction work is started on the ____ ocean outfall.Mr.Rihal reported thot the present survey crow would b ~ exiragod on the work now under construction for Districts Noi~•1 and 6,and that thooc would ho a need for a survey crew for prolin~.nary ~iork on tl~m ocean outfall sower. A motion was node by Director Willis H.Warner, seconded by Director C.H.Mil:Lor and duly carried by bhe Boards of i)lrectors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1, 2,3,5,6,7 and 11: That the Boards of Di.rcctdrs of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 hereby ask the dusirrr or çi:ecers ~~i-form the gonco:~al supervision on constructio: of the r~arinu section of the ocean outfall sower,under the tunas of their contract,and that tho~supervise the necessary proliii.inary unginuering work as a courtesy to the Districts;and ti:~at the design ongineurs,Harrison &ioolls~ and Headman,P1erguson &Carol.J.o,be paid by the County Sanitation Districts for ti-field party required for this wo i-k wI~ii lo tim final c orit rae t ~d.tie them is being workod.out iii-.Harrison,rep rosunbing the design engineers,stated that they werc;~‘ii~LL:t rig to grant the r~.qaust of the Die tricts for the performe.ocu of services r~qoir~d. Ad.ipurnrienb The Boards of .Uiracbors took the :Loiio~j•in~ac tlon: 11oved by Director Roy Seabridg€;,seconded by Director Charles E.Stevens and duly carried: That this meeting ho adjourned to tIio !~our of 8:00 p.m.,on October 29,1952 in Room 239 at l10L~West lighth Strue h,~3a~:i1;a.Aria,California. ~‘!hcrcupon,the Choinmer declared thL.meeting so adjou~.’r~c.d at 1O~20 p.m. 2.Authorizing onplo~unt of Jack .5.i~cimc~ Authori zing Harrison ~W67i~iT~y, -~ ~t a1 -. to supervise tue - pre1ir~inary work on the oc an out f a11 sewer -11 — 2 ç~r áian.,~ardA~ctorW County Sanitation DistrlcL No.7 Oran~ü County,California ATTEST: S~cratar~j,J~oard of Di c~ctor~ County Sa:i±tation District No,7 Oran~o County,California -12 — RESOLUTION NO.231 —7 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD 0?DIRECTORS OF CCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,DETERMINING THE LENGTH OF THE OCEAN OUTFALL SEWER (MARINE SECTION)AND DIRECTING COiJ~TY SANITATION DISTRICI’NO.1 OF ORANGE COUNTY TO SO PROCEED 1:IITH THE CONSTRUCTION. WHEREAS:County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7 and 11 of Orange County,California by Resolution 206 dated August 6,19~2,directed said District No.1 to award a contract to Healy Tibbitts Construction Company for the construction of the Ocean Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)and WHEREAS:said award of contract was made on the condition tha the length of the outfall be confirmed within sixty (60)days from the date of the contract,and WHEREAS:said sixty (60)day period will expire on November 3 19~2,now therefore,be it RESOLVED:that County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County,California does hereby find and determine that the Ocean Outfall Sewer (FIarine Section)be constructed to Station 70 ~1 00 a~ shown on the plans arid specifications therefor adopted by Resolutic No.17Lj-7 of the Board of ])irectors of last said District. FURTHER RESOL\1E1):that County Sanitation District No.1 of Orange County,California acting as Contracting Agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos.2,3,~,6,7 and 11 be and i~’ hereby directed to reaffirm the provision of’the contract with the Healy Tibbitts Construction Company;that the Ocean Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)be constructed to Station 70 /00 as hereinabove referred to. The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.7 on the 22nd day of October,19~2 ~ecreatry,Board 01 D:Lrecbors County Sanitation Liisti’ict No.7 Orange County,California 1ST STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ss COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I,ORA MAE MERRITT,Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County,California, do her’~by certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed arid ~dopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County,California,held on the 22nd day of October ,1952 by the following roll c~11 v~tet AYES:Directors Vincent L.Humeston,J.L.McBride and Willis H.Warner NOES:None ABSENT:None IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County,California. this 22nd day of October ,1952. ~~ ~~ryIr~~ County Sanitation District No.7 Orange County,California -2—