HomeMy WebLinkAboutDistrict 07 Minutes 1952-10-22T
MINUTES CF REGULAR ~ETING
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SAN I TAT I ON DISTRICT NO.7
ORANGE COUNTY,CALl i~OflNIA
October 22,l9~2 at 8:00 p.m.
Room 239,liOL~West Eighth Street
Santa Ana,California
The Board of Directors met in regular session at the hour of
8:00 p.m.,October 22,19S2 th R~on 239 at iiOL1.West High.th Street,
Santa Ana,California.
Chaii~ian Ninch called the joint meeting of the Districts’
Boards to order at 8:00 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of
the Board to he iresent.
Directors present:Vincent L.Humeston (Chairman)
Willis H.Warner
Norman H.Miller
Directors absent:None
Others Present:Nayriond N.Ribal,Chief Engineer and
General Manager
C.Arthur Nissan,Jr.
Harry Ashton
John A~Carollo
J.A.Woolley
i~•j.-jarrison
Nayriond ~1ortel
lJ~Lter Ra~sey
lenneth •i~~erry
Walter Cbaffee
Ora Mae ~ierritt,Secretary
Approval of The Boards of Directors of County Sani
Minutes tation Districts Nos,1,2,3,~,7 an~
11 took the following action:
Moved by Director Willis H.Namer,seconded by Director
Willia~i H.hirstein and duly carried:
That the minutes of the i~eet~n~,s held on October 1 and
October 8,l9~2 be approved as nailed out.
-1-’
____
The Boards of Directors of County
____
Sanitatio~i Districts Nos.l,2,3,~,6,
__________
7 and.1].took the following action:
Moved by Director Hugh W.iarden,seconded by Director
William H.Hirstein ~in.d duLy carried;
That the Joint Administrative ~varrant Register be approve
for signature and payment of:
War rant
Demand No.In Favor Of
_____
JA-14~O3 Davis Stationers 1.68
L~OLj.Dennis Printers 1~.3l
Klecn-Line Corporation 3.52
L~o6 Stai~dard Oil Company of California 32.7~
L107 F.R.Harwood,Postn.asber 30.00
83.2
Correspondence,
Conriunicat :~.ons
and_reports filed
1.cD~uarec::.ly ~a~dit The Secretary reported receipt of certi
fied anartenly audit report from the
firm of .Diehl and Company,and read
balances of each Districts t funds.
A motion was made by Director iiilis H.Warner seconded
by Director Vernon E.I,1angeribcck and duly carried by the
Boards of Directors of County Sath.tation Districts Nos.1,2,
3,~,6,7,8 and 11:
That the audit report for the quarter ending September
30,l9~2,received fror’i Diehl and Company be received and
ordered filed.
2.Vacation request The Secretary read a letter from Mary
B.Gillisnia,stenographer in the offic~
of the Joi~i~AcJriJ.n.istrative organizabion requesting paid
vacation.
The Boards of Diroctors took the following action:
Moved by Director Nelson N.Banner,seconded by Director
Vincent B.Humeston and duly carried by the Boards of
Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,3
and 11:
That ~:Jary B.Gillispie eriï’1loyed by the Districts as
Senior Stenographer—Clerk in.the Joint Administrative
Organization,be and she is hereby authorized to take a
vacation with pay beginning November 10,1952 to and in
cluding ~Iovember 21,1952.
Report of the Director Robert H.Boney,Chairman nro
Exe~ti.ve Conrattee ten of the fxecutive Committee reported
upon the meeting held on October 17,
1952,as follows:
Joint Adminis
trative_Warrant~
Register
~75
Amount
17G
1.Relative to the Boards’request fqr recommendation upon
filling the vacancy created by thp resignation.of the Chief
Ei-~gin~or and General Manager,the Committee reviewed the
rian~factors facin~the Districts in establishing sound
administration and organization of the joint Districts’
program.~I~’bç~’~s~de~iatiron of qu~J4!ications of men who
had applied ~or the posit~pn,the Corir.~iittee unanimously
reco:~niended the employment of hr.Lee N,Nelson as Chief
Engineer and General Manager upon a tr~ai basis at the
monthly salary of ~1,OOO.OO per month,and that regular
employment and amount of salary be determined by mutual
agreement between the Districts and Mr.Nelson within a
period nob •bo exceed six months.hr.Boney reported the
Committee had been advised b~hr.Nelson that if the
Districts desired his services,he could report for duty
about hove:’:ibcr 1st1
Director honey stated that Mr•Nelson had previously been
interviewed by a three man Committee comprised of Director
Warner,Director Warden and ~~omor Director Reed.Director
Warner was called upon for further information as to the
background of Mr.Nelson.
Director Warner reported that at the tine Mr.Nelson
appeared before the Committee he was employed by the City
of Rochester,Minnesota as Chief of the Utilities Commission,
that he is a registered civil and electrical engineer and
has now gone into private consulting work.Director ~Jarner
stated that Mr.Nelson enjoys a wide reputation as a very
able man,oven tempered and with the ability to work with
and.r~ot along with people in very complex situations;that
his qualifications would well Cit him for the position now
open whore there will be a volemo of administrative work
the Manager will be called unon to carry out.
2.Chairman Boney reporbed that the Committee had held over
the business of making a recommendation on the requested
annexation to County Sanitation District No.3,until all
information would be available and a report received froh
the J.0.S.
Employment of The Boards of Directors took the
Chief En~ineer following action:
and General
1~anager Moved by Director J.L.McBride,
_______—-
seconded by 1)irector Don B.Haiber
and duly carried by the hoards of Directors of County Sani
tation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11:
That the report of the Executive Committee be approved
and accepted;and that Mr.Leo N.Nelson be and he is
hereby employed as Chief Engineer and General Manager for
County Sanitation Districts ~os.1,2,3,5,,6,7,8 and 11
uuon a trial basis at the monthly salary of ~1,0OO.0O per
month,effective November 1,1952;and that regular employ
ment and amount of salary be determined by mutual agreement
between the Districts and.hr.Molson within a period not
to exceed six months.
Director C.N.Nelson,Cha~man of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No.6 stated that
inasmuch as Mr.Leo N.Nelson is his cousin,he believed it
to he only ethical to sever his connections with the
Districts and that he would resign as a rler1ber of the Board
of his District.
-3—
~7T
Report of the Director W~irner,Chairman of the
Finance CommItt~e FinaneQ Co~w4ttee reported that
the Committee had been working
upon the agreement wit1-~the engineers;but.,since the last
meeting,business affairs of members of the Committee had
made it impossible to hold very many rneetings together for
the purpose of studying d~~ls of the contract,and as they
felt this should be given very careful ~onsideration and a
draft of the contract prepared and mailed to the Directors
ahead of the joint meeting of the Boards,the Committee
recommended that their report be held over and made a special
matter of business at the regular nesting of the Boards on
November 12,l9~2;that previous to this meeting,the
Conm:~ttee could have the contract prepared in detail and sent
to the Directors.
The Boards of Directors tooJ~the following action:
f-loved by Director Nelson N.Launer,seconded by Director
Norman H.Miller and duly carried by the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7 and 1l~
That the report of the Finance Committee be approved and
acc opted.
_____
Director Burley requested that the
_________
officiol action of the Executive
Committee relative to employment
__________
of legal counsel for the Districts
ho read from thu minutes of the
meeting of the Executive Committee;and that the resolution
authorizing employment of Mr.Nisson be read.
At the request of the Chairman,the Secretary road the
fo11owin~excerpt from the minutes of the meeting of the
Executive Committee held on October 3,19~2:
Robert fT.Boney (Chairman)
Thomas J.I~adington,alternate
Lor Mr.Hugh 1•~iarden
J.L.McBride,alternate for
fIr.Courtney R.Chandler
Bradon Finch
C.M.Nelson
Vincent L.Hurieston
Others present:Raymond R.Ribal
B.J.Marks
K.J.Harrison
Ora Mao Merritt,Secretary
After a full discussion uron the employment of an
attorney for the Districts,a notion was made,duly seconded and
carried,that recommendation be made to the Districts’Boards that
C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.be e~ip1oyed as the attorney for the Districts
at the rate of ~3~5.OO per month,providing Mr.Nisson “terminates
his employment as the City Attorney for Tustin.”
The Secretary read Resolution No.90,authorizing employ
ment of C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.as legal counsel for the Joint Admin
istrative Organization of the eight County Sanitation Districts,
adopted by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts,
Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and 11 on October 10,l9~1.This resolutior
was carried in full in the condensed minutes of the meeting of
October 10,l9~i which were approved by the Boards on October 2L3,
i9~1.
Business hold over:
re:clarification
of terms of employ—
riont of legal counsel
Directors present:
178
The Chairman ealled upqn Mr Nisson for a report upon
the terms of his enploynent.Mr Nisson reported that he had no
knowledge of the Exocutive Corriittoe ninutes and that he had not
boen asked by anyone to agree to terms of enploynont other than
those contained in Resolution No.98;that if the Boards desired
his enploynent to be basod upon the terms contained in the Exocu
tive Comnittco ninubes~he would then report his decision.
There followed a full discussion by the Directors as to
whether or not there night be a conflict in services performed by
the legal counsel in serving a city and the Districts.
Tiio Boards of Dirootors took the following action:
I’iovod by Director Milford 11.Dahl,seconded by Director
Hugh ti.Warden:
That 14r.Nisson’s onploynent as Legal Counsel for the
Districts bo confirmed in accordance with Resolution No.98,adopto
by the Boards of Directors of County Sa.iitation Districts Nos.1,2:
3,5,6,7,8 and 11 on October 10,1952.
Director Boney spoke to the notion,stating that at the
time the Comnittee recorinonded Mr.Fisson’s enploynent,nanes of
other attornoys presontod to the Connittoo wore elininated from
consideration bocause they were attorneys for cities within the
Districts;and that hr.~j5~~n~5 name was considered only because
they wore informed he would resign as the attorney for the City of
Tustin if appointed legal counsel for the Districts.
Director Lari;enbeck stated that ho had been aware of the
fact that Mr.)Tisson had not resignod as attorney for Tustin,but
rOaliz3d that it is difficult for a city to appoint an attorney
upon short notice and that he had not raised the question as to tij.o
terms of Mr.Nisson’s onploynent until the city had had sufficient
tine to appoint a successor to Mr.Nisson.
Mr.Nisson stated that if trio majority of the Boards
desired that ho make a decision to continue his employment
in accordance with tho reconnendations contained in the
minutes of the Exucutivo Connitteots meeting,he would offer
his resignation as legal counsel to the Districts,offective
as of Octobar 31,1952.
The Chairman called for roll call vote upon the notion:
The veto was polled by roll call vote by Districts and
the Secretary reported the notion lost by tile following vote:
BOARD 01”DIR~CT0RS
DISTRICT NO.l Ayes:Directors Milford W.Dahl,and J.L.
r —
McBride
Noes:Director Wiflis H.Warner
Absent:None
BOARD OF DI&CWRS
DISTRICT ?0 2
___
Ayes:Directors Hugh W.Warden and
Charles IL Stevens
Noes:Direotors Robert H.Boney,Don B.
Haibor,Willis H.Warner and
William H.flirstein
Absent:Director Frank 3.Schweitzer,Jr.
_5..
:rTg
BOAFfl~OF DIRECTOF~S
DISTRICT NO 3
-
ayes;D~ectors Hugh N.Warden,Nelson
M.Launor,C.R.Miller and Joseph
Nob bar
Noes:Director Willis H.i~arner
Absent:None
HOARD OF DIR~CTOb~S
DISTRICT NO.~Ayes:None
Noes:~iroctors Bradon Finch,Norman
H.Miller and Willis H.Warner
Absent:None
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT 110.6 Ayes:None
Noes:Directors C.M.Nelson,Willis ~i.
1.:Jarflor and Norman H.Miller
Absent:None
BOARD OF DIR:ocToRs
DISTRICT 10.7 Ayes:Directors Vincent H.Hurieston and
J.H,~Ici3ride
Noes:Director Willis H.Warner
Absent:None
HOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISfPIICT NC.8 Ayes:Director Harold E.Edwards
-
Noes:Director Willis H.Warner
Absent:Director John R.Cropper
HOARD OFDIREJTORS
DISTRICTIlO.11 Ayes:None
Noes:Directors Willis H.Warner,
Vernon H.Langenbock and Roy
S eabridgo
Absent:None
After announcement of the vote,the Chairman requested
the legal counsel to state the rile as to the status of a tic
vote,hr.Hissori reportcd that in the event of a tic vote,the
motion would be lost.
Mr.Nisson offered his rosi;~nation as legal counsel for the
Districts,to h~COi~i~effectIve October 31,1952.
The Boards of DIrectors took the following action:
Moved by Director Willis H.Warner,seconded.b~y Director
Vernon E.Langonbock:
That tbe resignation of Mr.C.Arthur Nisson,as legal counsel
for the Districts,be accepted,cffcctivc as of October 31,1952,
The vote was polled by roll call vote by Districts and the
Secretary reported the motion lost by•~following vote:
fOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO 1 Ayes:Director Willis H.Warner
Noes:Directors J.H.McBride and
Milford N.Dahi
Absent:None
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO •
2 Ayes:Directors Robert H.Honey,Don h.
i:~aibcr,Will is H.Jarrier and
wi:Lliau~i H.1-lirstein
Noes:Directors Rugli ii.Warden and
Charles E.Stevens
Absent:Director Frank J.Schweitzer,Jr.
/
-a-
:~C’0
____
]~iroctor Willis H.Warner
Noes:Directors Hugh W.Warden,Nelsen H,
Launer,C.R.Miller and Joseph
Webb or
Absent:None
_______
Ayes:Directors Bradon Finch,Nor~iian H.
Miller and Willis H.Warner
NOeS:None
Absent:None
Ayes:Director Willis H.Warner
Noes:Directors Vincent L.Hunoston and
J.L.Mc.~ride
Absent:None
BOAIU)OF DIRHCTORS
DISTRICT NO 8
____
Ayes:Directors -1Jillis H.Warner,Vernon
B.Lan~onhock and Roy Seabridgo
Noes:None
Absent:None
____
Director Warner led a discussion ox
___________
the motion passed by the Boards on
October ~,l9~2,which would term
_____
inate the Districts’employees as
______
of November 1,l9~2 and provided
for vacation commensurate with
harner stated that the E~cecutive
notion and ~hc effect it would have
upon the completion of District Moe.1 and 6 lines,and offered
the suggestion that the Districts’employees he retained until
the arrival of Mr.Leo N.Nelson for his determination as to the
termination date of the employees whose services would no longer
be needed;and that the previous motion be rescinded and another
passed by the Boards specifically setting forth a method for
computing paid toxninal vacations,rocomriendin~that such a
formula follow as nearly as possible the County’s policy of
~vacation to per diem employees,except that no
terminal,vacation be given unless the employee had worked for
three morith:s or longer in the service of the Districts,
After a general discussion,the Boards of Directors took
the followLn~action:
Moved by Director .1.L.McBride,seconded by Director Roy
Seabrid~o and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of Counts
Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and 11:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.3
BOARD OF DI:RBCT0RS
DISTRICT_MO.~
BOARD OF oIRBCTORS
DISTRICT NO.6
E;OAR D 0?DIRBOTO RS
DISTRICT NO.7
Ayes:Directors C.N.Nelson,Bradon
Finch and Willis H.Warner
Noes:None
Absent:None
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Director i~.Jillis H.Warner
.U~iroctor harold H.Edwards
Director John H.Cropper
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.11
Clarification of
previous action
_____
relative to term
on Octohor31;19~2
length of service.Director
Committee had reviewed.th.i~
-7—
That the following motion adopted by the Boards of
Directors on October 8,1952:
“That the present employees of the joint Districts be
retained until November 1,1952 and that they be given vacatioi
coi~riensurato with the length ci’employment,based upon two
weeks per year.”
be and bEe ssi’ic is hereby rescinded.
Authorizing paid The Boards of Directors took the
terminal vacations followii]g,action:
Moved by Director Hugh i.J•1:Jarcion,seconded by Director
Joseph hebbor and duly carried by•~Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and 11:
That terminal vacations for employees involuntarily lcavir~
the services of the Districts after October 31,1952 be calcu
lated on the basis of one day’s :paid vacation for each 20 days
worked;that said tominal vacation pay be paid from the fund
or funds that the er~ployoe s salary has been charged to during
the course of his employment in the ernie ratio of past payment,
and that 21 working days per month be used for conput~ng daily
rates of pay.
The Chair recognized Mr.Kenneth Perry,employed by the
Districts as Assistant Bnginccr.hr.Ferry,requested the
DistrictsT consideration of two weeks’advance notice for
employees being involuntarily released from their employmun
with the Districts.
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
Moved by Director Roy Soabridr~o,seconded by Director Vornc
E.LanNonbock and duly carried by tlio Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11:
That two i~O~k~’advance notice be given each employee
before severance of employment by the Districts.
~:JE~BUSINESS
1.Reaffirmation of Director Bonoy requested the
contract with Boards’consideration of roaffir—
ridng the contract with Mealy
Company
_______
Tibbitts corleany for the con
struction of the marine section
of the ocean outfall to the full 7,000 foot;stat:Lng
that the time limit for reaffirmation would expire on
November 3,1952.
After a general discussion,the Boards of Directors
adopted Resolution No,231,determining th.o length of the
ocean outfall sewer (marine section)and directing County
Sanitation District No.1 to so eroceed with the construc
tion,Certified copies of this Resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of those minutes.
-8—
2.Extension of time Chairman Finch reported that tho 30-day
for submission of extension of time for submission of
final_plans ~plans and specifications agreed upon by
~eciftc~36~the Districts and the design engineers
would expire November 1,1952.The
Boards of Directors took the followi~ag action:
Moved by Director Willis H.Warner,seconded by Director
flobort H.Boney and duly carried by the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Disbricts Has.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11:
That the Boards of Directors hereby request the privi—
logo of holding in abeyance work on the plans and speci
fications for an additional 15 days from October 30,1952,
the expiration date of work suspension requested by the
Boards on October 1,1952 and granted by the engineers on
that date;and that the time for completion of plans and
specifications by the design un~rineors be extended 15 days.
Mr.John A.Carollo,representing the design engineers,
approved and agreed.to the extension requested by the Boards,
3.Proposed Review Director Vincent L.Humeston proposed,
of estimates by as a method of expediting bhe business,
a_consulting of th~Dist-ricts and in the interest
onginecrin~f]rm of posltJvL deterrnnet~on that the
-
bond funds available are insufficient
to construct the joint facilities under the original bond
proosal plan that a consu1tiw~engineering fix~i be employed
to revIew the estimates.
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
Moved by Director Vincent L,Hurioston.,seconded by
Director Milford W.Dahi:
That the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
employ a reputahLo cngineer:in~firm to review the currant
status of the bond engine ~a plan to determine whether or
not the proposed modification recommended by the Finance
Committee will host aorvL;the aeeds of the Districts in
relation to the bond plan.
The Chairman called for discussion of the motion and
Director Warner expressed the opinion that a motion for
employment should state terms arid conditions and author
ization for payment of services rendered;and.recommended
that the motion include instructions for securing proposals
from consulting engineering firms as the basis of payment,.
Director Warner offered a suhst:’tuto motion for consider
ation,and with the consent of the mover and the seconder
the following motion was substituted for the original motion,
and was duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11:
That Directors Hurieston and Warden be designated as a
Committee of two and that they he instructed to secure a
definite proposal from some competent engineering firm for
services they deem necessary in the review of the bond plan
and the modification plan and that the Committee so desig
nated report back to the floards at the earliest possible
time.
-9-
A discussion was held upon the possibility
____
of calling for bids under the bond proposal
___________
plan.Mr.John A.Carollo reported that all
plans and specifications under the bond
proposal plan,,cxcoptin~the troatmen~
plant,were now eQIlpiete and available and that the treat
ment plenb plans and specifications wore 6O~complete,,and
suggested that the Boards consider calling for bids on the
completed plans in order to detonuine the amount of funds
then available for the trcatrion~plant.Director Warner
requested ?lr.Ribal’s opinion on the recommendation of Mr.
Carollo,Mr.Ribal stated that he had always hold that bids
should ho called for and concurred in this procedure to
dcter~’i:Lno costs;but that ho could see nothing wrong with
the rovi~w as suggested.by Mc.Humeston.
The Boards of Directors took the following action~
~‘:‘iovod by Director willis H.Warner,seconded by
Director Norman H.Miller and.duly carried by the Boards
of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,
~,6,7 and 11:
That the design engineers ho requested to present
plan.s and specifications for the ~3ushard Street Trunk and
Treatment Plant Trunk Sewers to the Districts before the
next meeting of the Boards,on October 29,l9~2.
Hr.Rihal stated that ho had reviewed the plans and
specifications on the Ellis Av.~nuo Trunk Sewer and rocom—
mended correlation of certaln items in the specifications;
and,at the request of Director ±iaibor,itemized th~
correlations which ho stated to be of dimensional nature.
Mr.Ribal road his report and recom
mendations to the Directors.This report
______-
is on file ~the office of the Secretary.
The Boards of Directors took the following
action upon the reconrtondotions contained in the written
report of the Chief Engineer a-nd General Manager:
1.Authorizing Raymond A motion was mode by Director Willis H.
M.H~rtc1 to si~n Warner,seconded by Director Roy Soabridge
certain pop~rs and duly carried by the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,
3,5,6,73(3 a~d 11:
That Raymond M.Hertol,employed as Supervising
Engineer by the joint County Sanitation Districts,be and
he is hereby authorized to approve tine cards,sign the
payro.tJ.and warrant demands,a ign 1€tters reque s ting the
County Aud:Ltor to transfer such funds as may ho necessary
for the pajmorit of obligations,oversee the work now under
eo~isiruction.,certify progress pa~ents,prepare and sign
enr~inoerl s certificates and ~s timatos during the time that
R~nonci H.Hibal,Chief Hn-~ino~r and General Manager is on
vacation and until such tine as Hr.flibal’s successor
err ives.
-10 —
L1..Avai).~ahility of
bond 5~~T
plans for use in
calling for bids
Report of the Chief
Engineer and ~cnoral
Manager
L
____
A motion was made by Dirictor Willis
H.Warner,seconded by Director J.L.
McBride arid duly carried by the
Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos,1,2.,
3,5,6,7,and 11:
That the Boards of Directors of County Sanibation
Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and.11 hereby authorize
Raymond N.Hortol,Supervisin.c~~nginoor,to fill the vacanc;
created by the resic~riation of Carl S.Starnes,by employing
Jack R.~Ioi:mor as engineering aide at the salary of ~.303.0O
per month for the period October 27th to October 31,1952,
inclus ive.
The Chairman called upon Mr.Rihal
____
for a report upon the adequacy of tilL
_____
staff of the Districts to perform thL
preliminary engineering work when
_______
construction work is started on the
____
ocean outfall.Mr.Rihal reported
thot the present survey crow would b ~
exiragod on the work now under construction for Districts
Noi~•1 and 6,and that thooc would ho a need for a survey
crew for prolin~.nary ~iork on tl~m ocean outfall sower.
A motion was node by Director Willis H.Warner,
seconded by Director C.H.Mil:Lor and duly carried by bhe
Boards of i)lrectors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,
2,3,5,6,7 and 11:
That the Boards of Di.rcctdrs of County Sanitation
Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 hereby ask the dusirrr
or çi:ecers ~~i-form the gonco:~al supervision on constructio:
of the r~arinu section of the ocean outfall sower,under the
tunas of their contract,and that tho~supervise the
necessary proliii.inary unginuering work as a courtesy to the
Districts;and ti:~at the design ongineurs,Harrison &ioolls~
and Headman,P1erguson &Carol.J.o,be paid by the County
Sanitation Districts for ti-field party required for this
wo i-k wI~ii lo tim final c orit rae t ~d.tie them is being workod.out
iii-.Harrison,rep rosunbing the design engineers,stated
that they werc;~‘ii~LL:t rig to grant the r~.qaust of the Die tricts for
the performe.ocu of services r~qoir~d.
Ad.ipurnrienb The Boards of .Uiracbors took the
:Loiio~j•in~ac tlon:
11oved by Director Roy Seabridg€;,seconded by Director
Charles E.Stevens and duly carried:
That this meeting ho adjourned to tIio !~our of 8:00
p.m.,on October 29,1952 in Room 239 at l10L~West lighth
Strue h,~3a~:i1;a.Aria,California.
~‘!hcrcupon,the Choinmer declared thL.meeting so
adjou~.’r~c.d at 1O~20 p.m.
2.Authorizing onplo~unt
of Jack .5.i~cimc~
Authori zing Harrison
~W67i~iT~y,
-~
~t a1
-.
to supervise tue
-
pre1ir~inary work
on the oc an out f a11
sewer
-11 —
2 ç~r
áian.,~ardA~ctorW
County Sanitation DistrlcL No.7
Oran~ü County,California
ATTEST:
S~cratar~j,J~oard of Di c~ctor~
County Sa:i±tation District No,7
Oran~o County,California
-12 —
RESOLUTION NO.231 —7
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD 0?DIRECTORS OF CCUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO.7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA,DETERMINING THE LENGTH OF THE OCEAN
OUTFALL SEWER (MARINE SECTION)AND DIRECTING
COiJ~TY SANITATION DISTRICI’NO.1 OF ORANGE
COUNTY TO SO PROCEED 1:IITH THE CONSTRUCTION.
WHEREAS:County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7
and 11 of Orange County,California by Resolution 206 dated August
6,19~2,directed said District No.1 to award a contract to Healy
Tibbitts Construction Company for the construction of the Ocean
Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)and
WHEREAS:said award of contract was made on the condition tha
the length of the outfall be confirmed within sixty (60)days from
the date of the contract,and
WHEREAS:said sixty (60)day period will expire on November 3
19~2,now therefore,be it
RESOLVED:that County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange
County,California does hereby find and determine that the Ocean
Outfall Sewer (FIarine Section)be constructed to Station 70 ~1 00 a~
shown on the plans arid specifications therefor adopted by Resolutic
No.17Lj-7 of the Board of ])irectors of last said District.
FURTHER RESOL\1E1):that County Sanitation District No.1 of
Orange County,California acting as Contracting Agent for itself
and County Sanitation Districts Nos.2,3,~,6,7 and 11 be and i~’
hereby directed to reaffirm the provision of’the contract with the
Healy Tibbitts Construction Company;that the Ocean Outfall Sewer
(Marine Section)be constructed to Station 70 /00 as hereinabove
referred to.
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted at a regular
meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No.7 on the 22nd day of October,19~2
~ecreatry,Board 01 D:Lrecbors
County Sanitation Liisti’ict No.7
Orange County,California
1ST
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
ss
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I,ORA MAE MERRITT,Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County,California,
do her’~by certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed arid
~dopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County,California,held on
the 22nd day of October
,1952 by the following roll c~11 v~tet
AYES:Directors Vincent L.Humeston,J.L.McBride
and Willis H.Warner
NOES:None
ABSENT:None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
seal of County Sanitation District No.7 of Orange County,California.
this 22nd day of October ,1952.
~~
~~ryIr~~
County Sanitation District No.7
Orange County,California
-2—