HomeMy WebLinkAboutDistrict 05 Minutes 1952-10-22MINUTES OF REGIJLAR MEETING
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION JJISTRICT NO.5
ORANGE COTJITTY~CALIFORNIA
Octobor 22,19~2 at 8:00 p.m.
Room 239,110)4.West Eighth Street
Santa Ana,California
The Board.of Directors met in regular session at the hour of
8:00 p.m.,October 22,19~2 i~Root-i 239 at llOL~~iest Eighth Street,
Santa Ana,CaliCor~iLa.
Chairman Finch called lhe joint neeting of the Districts’
Boards to order at 8:00 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of
the Board to he present.
Directors present:Braden Finch (0hairman)
Norman H.Miller
Willis H.Warner
Directors absent:None
Others Present:Raymond R.Ribal,Chief Engineer and
General Manager
C.Arthur ~isson,Jr.
Harry Ashton
John A,Carollo
j.A.Uoolley
K.J.i-jarrison
Haymond ~ortel
Vial~er Ra.~~sey
L’~e nne t h j)e ri~y
Walter Chaffee
Ora Mae ~ierritt,Secretary
Approval of The Boards of Directors of County Sani
Minutes~~tation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,7 arid.
11 took the following action:
Moved by Director Willis H.Warner,seconded by Director
Willian H.Hirstein and duly carried:
That the minutes of the p1eet1nr~s held on October 1 and
October
,l9~2 be approved as nailed out,
_______
The 3oa~1s of Directors of County
____
Sanitation Districts Nos.~1,2,3,5,6,
____________
7 an~11 took the following action:
Noved by flirector Hugh ~‘.warden,seconded by Director
William H.Hirstein.a~i.d di~ly carried;
That the Joint Administrative ~i~arrant Register be approve
for signature and payment of:
War rant
Demand No.In Favor Of
______
JA—L1.03 Davis Stationers 1.68
L~OL~Dennis Printers 15.31
L~O5 ~1een-Line Corporation 3.52
L~O6 Standard Oil Company of California 32.75
L~O7 F.H.Harwood,Postmaster 30.00
83.~
Co rre spondonc o,
Communi cat :~.a ns
and reports filed
1.Quar.~o:~ly i~vc1it The Secretary reported receipt of certi~
~
fled quarterly audit report from the
firm of Diehi and Company,and read
balances of each Districts I funds.
A notion was made by Director ~villis H.Warner seconded
by Director Vernon H.Lan~enbcck and duly carried by the
i3oards of Directors of Count~i Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,
3,5,6,7,8 and 11:
That the audit report for ~quarter ending September
30,1952,received from Diehi anh Company be received and
ordered filed.
2.Vacotioii.roqi~.ost The Secretary read a letter from Nary
-~-..
H.Gilliepia,stenographer in the offic
of the Joint Administrative or~anizatiori requesting paid
vacation.
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
hoved by Director Nelson N.Launer,seconded by Director
Vincent B.Humeston and duly carried by the Boards of
Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,3
and 11:
Thab tiary B.Gillisoie ermloyed b~r the Districts as
Senior stenographer—Clerk in the Joint Administrative
Orgarxizstion,be and she is berehy authorized to take a
vacation with pay beginning November 10,1952 to and.in—
cluding November 21,1952.
Report of the Director Robert H.Boney,Chairman ~ro
Exe~ut ive Committee ter~of the Executive Committee reported
upon the meeting held on October 17,
1952,as follows:
Joint_Adninis~
t~ative ~
•~•~~
177
Amount
-2—
~78
1,Relative to the Boards’request for recommendation upon
filling thb vacancy created by tho resignation of the Chief
Engineer and GeneralManager,the Committee reviewed the
nan~,~actors facing the Districts in establishing sound
administration arid o~ar4iz~t~on o4~the ~oint Districts’
program.~f~pr ~o s~dQ~tiron of qu~~ications of men who
had applied ~or bhe po~itiQn,~the Committee unanimously
recommended the employment of hr.Lee N.Nelson as Chief
Engineer and General Manager upon a trial basis at the
monthly salary of ~l,OOO.OO per month,and that regular
emoloyment and amount of salary be deter~ined by mutual
agreement between the Districts and Mr.Nelson within a
period not to exceed six months,Mr.Boney reported the
Conriittee had been advised b~’~r.Nelson that if the
Districts desired his services,he could report for duty
about November let.
Director P~oney stated that Mr,Nelson had previously been
interviewed by a three man Committee comprised of Director
Warner,Director Warden and ~oimer Director Reed.Director
Warner was called upon for :i~urbhor information as to the
background of Mr.Nelson.
Director Warner reported that at the tine Mr.Nelson
appeared before the Committee he was employed by the City
of Rochester,Minnesoba as Chief of the Utilities Commission,
that he is a registered civil and electrical engineer and
has now gone into private consulting work.Director Warner
stated that Mr.Nelson enjoys a wide reputation as a very
able nan,oven tempered and with the ability to work with
and.,~ot along with people in very complex situations;that
his qualifications would well fit him for the position now
open whore there will be a voln;!c of administrative work
the Manager will be called upon to carry out,
2.Chairman Boney reported that the Committee had held over
the business of making a recommendation on the requested
annexation.be County Sanitation District No.3,until all
information would be available and a report received from
the J.C.S.
Employment of The Boards of Directors took the
Chief Eiig~ineer followinp~action~
and Geneial
-~
Manager~Moved by Director J.L.McBride,
secondea by Director Don B.Haibor
and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sani
tation Districts Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and 11:
That the report of the Executive Committee be approved
and accepted;and that Mr.Leo N.Nelson be and he is
hereby employed as Chief Engineer and General Manager for
County Sanitation Districts hoe.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and II
unon a trial basis at the monthly salary of ~l,OOO.OO per
nonth,effective November 1,1952;and that regular employ
ment and amount of salary be detormine.d by mutual agreement
between the Districts and.Mr.Nelson within a period not
to exceed six months.
Director C.H.Nelson,Cha~m~ian of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No.6 stated that
inasmuch as Mr.Lee M.Nelson is his cousin,ho believed it
to he only ethical to sever his connections with the
Districts and that he would resi~gn as a member of the Board
of his District.
-3—
179
Report of the Director Warner,Chairman of the
Finance Committee Finance Committee reported that
the Committee had been working
upon the agreement with the engineers;but,since the last
meeting,business affairs of members of the Committee had
made it impossible to hold vo~’y many meetings together for
the purpose of studying de~ils of the contract,and as they
felt this should be given very careful consideration and a
draft of the contract prepared and mailed to the Directors
ahead of the joint meeting of the Boards,the Committee
recommended that their report be heLd over and made a special
matter of business at the regular meeting of the Boards on
November 12,l9~2;that previous to ti~1s meeting,the
Corim:~ttee could have the contract prepared in detail and sent
to the Directors,
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
Moved by Director Nelson N.Launer,seconded by Director
Norman H.Miller a~id duly carried by the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7 and l1~
That the report of th.e Finance Committee be approved and
accepted.
_____
Director Boney requested that the
__________
officiel action of the Executive
Committee relative to employment
of legal counsel for the Districts
be read from the minutes of the
meeting of the Executive Committee;and that the resolution
authorizing employment of Mr.Nisson he read~
At the request of the Chairman,the Secretary read the
following excerpt from the minutes of the meeting of the
Executive Committee h~id on October 3,l9~2:
Robert H.Honey (Chairman)
Thomas J.I~adington,alternate
~or Mr.Hugh ~J.~Jarden
5.L.McBride,alternate for
hr.Courtney H.Chandler
Bradon Finch
C.N.Nelson
Vincent L.Hurieston
Others present:Raymond H.Ribal
B.5.Marks
K.J.Harrison
Ora Mae Merritt,Secretary
After a full discussion upon the employment of an
attorney for the Districts,a motion was made,duly seconded and
carried,that recommendation be made to the Districts’Boards that
C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.be employed as the attorney for the Districts
at the rate of ~3~.OO per month,providing Mr.Nisson “terminates
his employment as the City Attorney for Tustin.~’
The Secretary read Resolution No.98,authorizing employ
ment of C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.as legal counsel for ti-ic Joint Adriin—
istrativo Organization of the eight County Sanitation Districts,
adopted by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts,
Nos.1,2,3,~,6,‘7,6 and 11 on October 10,l9~1.This resolutiot
was carried in full in the condensed minutes of the meeting of
October 10,i9~1 which were approved by the Boards o~October 214,
l9~l.
Business held over:
re:clarification
of ten~is of eniploy—
i~nt of lO~a1 ~coürthel
Directors present:
“fl
The Chairman called upon Mr.Nisson for a report upon
the terms of his employment.Mr.Nisson reported that ho had no
knowledge of the Executive Committee minutes and that he had not
been asked by anyone to agree to terms of employment other than
those contained in Resolution No.98;that if the Boards desired
his employment to be based upon the terms contained in the 1~xccu-
tive Committee minutes,h~would then report his decision.
There followed a full discussion by the Directors as to
whether or not there night be a conflict in services performed by
the legal counsel in serving a city and the Districts.
The Boards of Directors took t}.ie following action:
hbved by Director Nilford N.Del-il,seconded by Director
Hugh W.‘Jardon~
-
That hr.Nissont s employment as Legal Counsel for the
Districts ho confirmed in accordance with Resolution No.98,adopto
by the Boards of Directors of County SaLutation Districts lbs.1,2:
3,~,6,7,8 and 11 on October 10,1952.
Director Bone~y spoke to the notion,stating that at the
time the Committee recommended I-fr.hisson’s emr~loyrient,names of
other attorneys presented to the Committee wore e1ii~~inated from
consideration because they were attorneys for cities within the
Districts;and that hr.Nisson’s marie was considered only because
they were inforTiethhe would resign as rho attorney for the City of
Tustin if ap~ointcd legal counsel for the Districts.
Director Langenbeck stated that ho had been aware of the
fact that hr.hisson had not rosigncd as attorney for Tustin,but
realized that it is difficult for a city to appoint an attorney
upon short notice and that he had not raised the question as to the
terms of Ifr.Nissan’s employment until the city had had suf:~iciont
tine to appoint a successorto hr.Nisson.
hi’.Nisson stated that if the majority of the Boards
desired that he make a decision to continue his employment
in accordance with the recommendations contained in the
minutes,of the Executive Coi~n~iittoo’s meeting,he would offer
his resignation as legal counsel to the Districts,affective
as of October 31,1952.
The Chairman called for roll call vote upon the motion:
The veto was polled by roll call vote by Districts and
the Secretary reported the notion lost by the following vote:
BOARD OF TIRRCTQHS
DISTRICT NO.1 Ayes:Directors Milford N.Dahi,and J.L.
—~
McBride
l’focs:Director ~.‘Jil1is H.Warner
Absent:None
BOARD OF DIRhC~{ORS
DISTRICT i’~O 2 Ayes:Directors Hugh N.l~arden and
Charles H.Stevens
Noes:Directors Robert H.Boney,Don B.
Haiber,Willis H.Warner and
Nilliam H.ilirstein
Absent:Director Frank J.Schweitzer,Jr.
-5-
i81
BOARD 0?DIRECTOE~S
DISTRICT NO.3 Ayes;i~i~ectors Hugh N.Warden,Nelson
N,~a~uaor,C.R.Miller and joseph
Wobbor
Noes:Director Willis H.Warner
Absent:None
BOARD OF DIRECTONS
DiSTRICT NO.~Ayes:None
V
Noes:Directors Bradon Finch,Noruan
H.Nillor and Willis H.Warner
Absent.:None
/
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.6
-
Ayes:None
_______
Noes:Directors C.N.Nelson,Willis r..
~Ja~cr and Norman 1.1 Miller
Absent:None
BOAR])OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.7 /Ayes:Directors Vincent L.Hur-toston and
J.L.McBride
Noes:Director Willis H.Warner
Absent:None
BOARD OF DIRTIETORS
DISTRICT NO.8 Ayes:Director Harold E.Edwards
---
Noes:Director Willis H.Warner
Absent:Director John R.Cropper
DOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT_HO.11 Ayes:None
____V V
Noes:Directors Willis H.Warner,
Vernon B.Langonbeck and Roy
SoahriVd5e
Absent:None
After announcement of the vote,the Chairman requested
the legal course 1 ~state the rule as to the status of a tie
vote,hr.Nisson reported that in thu event of a tic vote,the
motion would he lost.
Mr.Mis son offered his ros1V~naflon as legal counsel for the
Districts,to hucoi~c effective October 31,l9~2..
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
Moved by Diroctor~Willis H.Warner,seconded.by Director
Vernon B.Langonbock:
That the resignation of Mr.C.Arthur Nisson,as legal counsel
for the D:Lstric~s,be accepted,effective as of October 31,l9~2.
The vote was polled by roll call vote by Districts and the
Secretary roported the motion lost by tl1c following vote:
POARD OF DIRECTORS
pISTRICTj’~Q.J~_~~Ayes:Director Willis H.Warner
V V
Noes:Directors J.L.McBride and
Milford N,Dahi
Absent:None
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT No.2 Ayes:Directors Robert H.Honey,Don .h.
—_____———
Fai b~r,111111 ~11 J ~rne r dud
Wi]L:Lam H,1-lirsteim
Noes :Directors Ru~1~V.j Warden and
Charles E,Stevens
Absent:Director Frank J.SchweItzcr,Jr.
~82
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.3 Ayes:~nc~ctor Vililis H.Warner
Noes:Directors Hugh W.Warden,Nelson M.
Launer,C.S.Miller and Joseph
Webb cr
Ab~3cnt:None
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT No.5 Ayes;~iroctors Braden Finch,Noniian H.
Miller and ~Jullis H.Warner
Noes:None
Absent:None
BOARD OF ..IREOTORS
DISTRICT NO.6 Ayes:Directors C.N.Nelson,Braden
Finch and Willis H.Warner
Noes:None
Absent:None
BOARD OJ’DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.7 Ayes:Director Willis H.iiarnor
Noes:Directors Vincent L.Hurieston and
J.L.Mc1ride
Absent:None
BOARD OF DIR~CToHS
DISTRICT NO 8 Ayes:Director Willis H.~Jarnor
Noes:Uirector harold 1.Edwards
Absent:Director John H.Cropper
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.11 Ayes:Directors ~iJu1lis H,Warner,Vernon
—
B.Langonbeck and Roy Soabridgo
Noes:None
Absent:None
Clarification.of
____
Director Warner led a discussion or
prov~~~ITo~
_____
the notion passed by the Boards on
rolativcTho bTr~-October C,1952,which would torn
inafT~Ti of employees mate the.Districts I employees as
3~Octo~of November 1,1952 and provided
for vacation corij~ionsurato with
length of service,Director ‘farmer stated that the E>~ecutive
C,oririittoo had reviewed this eLation and the effect it would have
upon the compJ.otion of District Nos,1 and 6 lines,and offered
the suggestion that the Dis ~ricts’employees be retained until
the arrival of Mr.Lee N.Nelson for his determination as to the
termination date of the employees whose services would no longer
be needed;and that the previous notion be rescinded and another
passed by the Boards specifically setting forth a method for
computing paid terminal vacations,rocoririending that such a
formula follow as nearly as possible the County’s policy of
granting paid vacation to per di~n employees,except that no
terminal vacation be given unless the employee had worked for
three months or longer in the service of the Districts.
After a general discussion,~Boards of Directors took
the followin~~action:
Moved by Director J.L.McBride,seconded by Director Roy
Seabridge and duly carried by the toards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11:
—7-.
~83
That the following notion adopted by the Boards of
Directors on October 8,i9~2:
“Th~the present employees ci’the joinb Districts be
retained until November 1,1952 and that they be given vacatio~
comriensurato with the length of onployment,based upon two
weeks per year.”
be and the sari®is hereby rescinded,
Authorizing paid The Boards of Directors took the
torriinal vacai following action:
Moved by Director Bugh i;J•‘~iarden,seconded by Director
Joseph Webbor and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts ~os.J~,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11:
That terminal vacations for employees involuntarily lcavini
the services of the Districts after October 31,1952 be calcu
lated on the basis of one day’s paid vacation for each 20 days
worked;that said terninal vacation pay be paid from the fund
or funds that the emolovee’s salary has been charged to during
the course of his employment in the saiie ratio of past payment,
and that 21 working days per month he used for coriput:Lng daily
rates of pay.
The Chair recognized Hr.Kenneth.Perry,employed by the
Districts as Assistant Engineer,hr.Perry,requested the
Districts consideration of two weo~s advance notice for
employees being involuntarily released from their’employmon
with the Districts.
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
Moved by Director R~y Scabridr~e,seconded by Director Vernc
E.Lan~cnhock and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts ~os,1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11:
That two weeks’advance notice be given each employee
before scivorarjco of employment by the Districts.
i\E~I BUsINESS:
1.Reaffirmation of Director Bonoy requested the
coiitract with ~oards~consideration of roaffir—
~ruhT~g the contract with Hoaly
Company
_______
Tibbitts corleany for the con
struction of the marine section
of the ocean outfall to the full 7,000 foot;stating
that the tine limit for reaffirmation would expire on
Noveribor 3,1952.
After a general discussion,the Boards of Directors
adopted.Resolution No.231,determining th.o length of the
ocean outfall sower (marine section)and directing County
Sanitation District No.1 •bo so erocead with the construc
tion.Certified copies of this Resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
-8—
18 ~
2.Extension of time Chairman Finch reported that the 30-day
f5r submission of extension of tine for submission of
final ~I~in~n~plans and specifications agreed upon by
specf:~c~~ons the Districts and the design engineers
would expire November 1,1952.The
Boards of Directors took the fol1owin~action:
Movod by Director Willis H.1iiarnor,seconded by Director
Robert H..Honey and duly carried by the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11:
That the Boards of Directors hereby request the privi—
logo of holding in.abeyance work on the plans and spcici
fication.s for an additional 15 days from October 30,1952,
the expiration date of work suspension requested by the
Boards on October 1,1952 and granted by the engineers on
that date;and that the time for completion of plans and
specifications by the design ungineers be extended 15 days,
Mr.John A.Carollo,representing the design engineers,
approved and agreed.to the extension requested by the Boards.
3.Proposed Review Director Vincent L.Hu~meston proposed,
of ostinatosby as a method of expediting the business,
a_consulting of the Districts and in the interest
~of posit~v dcturinin~ton that the
_______-V
bond funds available are insufficient
to construct the joint facilities under the original bond
proeosal plan that a consulting engineering firn be employed
to review the estimates.
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
Moved by Director Vincent L.Humeston,seconded by
Director Milford W.Dahi:
That the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
employ a reputable ongin ri.nc~fir~n to review the current
status of the bond engineer’s plan to determine whether or
not the proposed modification recomriended by the Finance
Committee wi]j best survu the aeods of the Districts in
relation to the bond plan.
The Chairman called for discussion of ttie motion and
Director Warner expressed tho opinion that a motion for
employment should state terms arid conditions and author
ization for payment of services rendered;and recommended
that the notion include instructions for securing proposals
from consulting engineering fin~is as the basis of payment.
Director Warner offered a suhst:Ytute motion for consider
ation,and with the consent of the mover and the seconder
the following motion was substituted for the original motion,
and was duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts i’IOS.1,2,3,5,6,7 arid 11:
That Directors Humeston and Warden ho designated as a
Committee of two and that they ho instructed to secure a
definite proposal from some competent engineering firm for
services they deem necessary in the review of the bond plan
and the modification plan and that the Committee so desig
nated report back to the Boards at the earliest possible
time.
185
L1..Availability of A discussion was hold upon the possibility
bbnd proposal of calling for bids under the bond proposal
j5lansforusoin plan.Mr.John A.Carollo reported that all
calling for bids plans and specifications under the bond
proposal plan,excepting the treatment
plant,were now complete and available and that the treat
ment plant plans and specifications were 6O~6 complete,and
sug~ostcd that the Boards consider calling for bids on the
completed ~ians in order to determine the amount of funds
then available for the treatment plant.Director Warner
requested jvjp Ribal’s opinion on the roconncndation of Mr.
Carollo.Mr.Riba].stated that he had always hold that bids
should be called :ror and concurred in this procedure to
detcrmil.TLO costs;but that he could see nothing wrong with
the revi~w as suggested by Mr.}Iuneston,
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
Moved by Director Willis H.Warner,seconded by
Director i’Torman H.Miller and duly carried by the Boards
of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,
~,6,7 and 11:
That the des i~r~engineers ho roques tad to present
plan.s and specifications for the )~ushard Street Trunk and
Treatment Plant Trunk Sewers to tile Districts before the
next meeting of the Boards,on October 29,l9~2.
Mr.Rihal stated that ho had reviewed the plans and
specifications on the Ellis Av~nue Trunk Sewer and rccori—
mendod correlation of certain items in the specifications;
and,at the request of Director heibor,itemized the
correlations which ho stated to he of’dimensional nature.
Report of the Chief Mr.Rihal road his report and recom
E~ngineor ~riendations to the Directors.This report
Manager is on file in.the office of the Secretary.
________
The Boards of Directors took the following
action upon the recommendations contained in the written
roport of the Chief Engineer and General Manager:
1.Authorizing Raymond A motion was :aade by Director Willis H.
M.lbo sign Warner,seconded by Director Roy Seabridgo
eortoinpa~ers and duly carried by the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,
3,~,6,7,B u~d 11:.
That Raymond N.Hertel,employed as Supervising
Engineer by the join.t County Sanitation Districts,be and
ho is hereby authorized to approve time curds,sign the
payroiLl and warraat domendn,si.gn letters requesting the
County Auditor to transfer such funds as may be necessary
for the pajmont of obligations,oversee the work now under
coustruct:Lon,certify progress pa~ents,prepare and sign
engrinoor’s certificates and Lstlnates during the tine that
Rareaond H.R:Lbal,Chief Bn~ine~r’and Genera].Manager is on
vacation and until such tine us IlIr.Ribal’s successor
arrives.
-10 —
A motion was riado by Dirictor Willis
H.Warner,seconded by Director J,L.
MeBrido and duly carried by the
Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos,1,2,
3,~5,6,7,and ii:
That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 hereby authorizo
Ha~uond N.Hortol,Suporvisin~.~ginoer,to fill the vacanc~
created by the r’esir~riatiori of Carl S.Starnos,by employing
Jack H •
~1oime r as engineering aide at the salary of’~~3O3 ~OO
por month for the period October 27th to October 31,1952,
inclus ivo,
The Chai.nhian called upon Mr.Ribal
____
for a report upon the adequacy of thL.
_________
staff of the Districts to perform thc
_____
prolir~inary engin ring work when
______
construction work is started on the
_______
ocean outfall.Mr.Rihal reported
that the present surv~iy crew would b~
enr.~aed on the wo.r’k now under cons true bion for Districts
Moe.1 and 6,and that theee would be a need for a survey
crew for prelir~1r~ai~y t~iork on the ocean outfall sower.
A notion was made by Director Willis I-I.Warner,
scco:cdod by Director C.H.Miller arid duly carried by the
Boards of ~D1rectors of County Sahetation Districts Nos.1,
2,3,5,6,7 and 11:
That the Boards of DirectOrs of County Sanitation
Districts Nos.:i,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 hereby ask the d.;ir~r~
onyi~o’~rs to purfon~the g’encua].supervision on cons tructio~
of the ~earinu section of the acear outfall sower,under the
turmu of their contract,and that they supervise the
necessary prcllmnary oneinoering work as a courtesy to the
Districts;and that the design engineers,Harrison &Woolley
and Headman,Ferguson &Carcilo,he paid by the County
Sanitation Districts for ‘the field party required for ‘this
work while the final contract ~ci.th then is being worked out.
Hr.itarrison,representing the design engineers,stated
that they wore t’r:LlLlng tO gr~~i~t tI.LC i’L:qUJe t.of the Dis tricts for
the perform::.~-~cu of servic us reqai.red.
The Boards of .i)Irac bars took the
foilo~iing ac t~on:
hovoci by Director Roy Soabrid~u,seconded by Director
Charles H.htevons and duly carried:
That this ~~icetin~be actjourned to the hour of 8:00
p.m.,on October 29,1952 in Roorl 239 cit iioL~.West kighth
Sbru~b,Santa Aria,California.
~!horeupon,ti-ic Cheini.an d;clared the rmioting so
acLjournod at 10:20 p .ii.
2,Authorizing cmp1o~icnt
of Jack R.~oir~cr —
186
Authori zing Harrison
&Woolley ot al
to SU~U rv is C the
p re 1 iriinary wo rk
on the 6~.~ri o~uff~1l
S owor
—11 —
~87
-~~
Chairman,Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No.5
Oran~o County,California
ATTEST:
~~
S~croGary,i-~oara oi Diroctors
County Sanitation District No.5
Oror~~o County,Ga~.ifornia
-12 —
198
RESOLUTION NO.231_5
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CCUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO.5 CF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA,DETERMINING THE LENGTH OF THE OCEAN
OUTFALL SE~’)ER (MARINE SECTION)AND DIRECTING
COUNTY SAI’T1TATION DIST~IC2 i\O.1 OF ORAN’IE
COUNTY TO SC PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION.
WHEREAS:County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7
and 11 of Orange County,California by Resolution 206 dated August
6,1952,directed said District No.1 to award a contract to Mealy
Tibbitts Construction Company for the construction of the Ocean
Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)and
WHEREAS:said award of contract was made on the condition tha
the length of the outfall be confirmed within sixty (60)days from
the date of ~he contract,and
NHEREAS:said sixty (60)day period will expire on November 3
1952,now therefore,be it
RESOLVRi):that County Sanitation District No.5 of Orange
County,California does hereby find and determine that the Ocean
Outfall Sewer (1’Iarine Section)be constructed to Station 70 /00 as
shown on the plans arid specifications therefor adopted by Resolutio
No.l7L~-5 of the Board of Directors of last said District.
FURTHER R2~SOLVED:that County Sanitation District No.1 of
Orange County,California acting as Contracting Agent for itself
and County Sanitation Districts Nos.2,3,5,6,7 and 11 be and is
hereby directed to reaffirri the provision of the contract with the
Mealy Tibbitts Construction Company;that the Ocean Outfall Sewer
(Marine Section)be constructed to Station 70 /00 as hereinabove
i-’eferred to.
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted at a regular
meeting of bhe Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No.5 on the 22nd day of October,1952
~ey,Bo~of Di~éctors
County Sanitation i)is~rict No.5
Orange County,California
-l -
189
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
ss
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I,ORA MAE MERRITT,Secretary of the Bbard of Directors of
County Sanitation District ~oa 5 of Orange County,California,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed and
adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No.5 of Orange County,California,held on
the 22nd day of’October ,1952 by the following roil call v~’i~e;
AYES:Directors Braden Finch,Norman H.Miller
and Willis H.Warner
NOES:None
ABSENT:None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
seal of County Sanitation District No.5 of Orange County,California
thIs 22nd day of October ,1952.
Secretary,Board ~iJirect~ors
County Sanitation District No.5
Orange County,California
—2