Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDistrict 05 Minutes 1952-10-22MINUTES OF REGIJLAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION JJISTRICT NO.5 ORANGE COTJITTY~CALIFORNIA Octobor 22,19~2 at 8:00 p.m. Room 239,110)4.West Eighth Street Santa Ana,California The Board.of Directors met in regular session at the hour of 8:00 p.m.,October 22,19~2 i~Root-i 239 at llOL~~iest Eighth Street, Santa Ana,CaliCor~iLa. Chairman Finch called lhe joint neeting of the Districts’ Boards to order at 8:00 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board to he present. Directors present:Braden Finch (0hairman) Norman H.Miller Willis H.Warner Directors absent:None Others Present:Raymond R.Ribal,Chief Engineer and General Manager C.Arthur ~isson,Jr. Harry Ashton John A,Carollo j.A.Uoolley K.J.i-jarrison Haymond ~ortel Vial~er Ra.~~sey L’~e nne t h j)e ri~y Walter Chaffee Ora Mae ~ierritt,Secretary Approval of The Boards of Directors of County Sani Minutes~~tation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,7 arid. 11 took the following action: Moved by Director Willis H.Warner,seconded by Director Willian H.Hirstein and duly carried: That the minutes of the p1eet1nr~s held on October 1 and October ,l9~2 be approved as nailed out, _______ The 3oa~1s of Directors of County ____ Sanitation Districts Nos.~1,2,3,5,6, ____________ 7 an~11 took the following action: Noved by flirector Hugh ~‘.warden,seconded by Director William H.Hirstein.a~i.d di~ly carried; That the Joint Administrative ~i~arrant Register be approve for signature and payment of: War rant Demand No.In Favor Of ______ JA—L1.03 Davis Stationers 1.68 L~OL~Dennis Printers 15.31 L~O5 ~1een-Line Corporation 3.52 L~O6 Standard Oil Company of California 32.75 L~O7 F.H.Harwood,Postmaster 30.00 83.~ Co rre spondonc o, Communi cat :~.a ns and reports filed 1.Quar.~o:~ly i~vc1it The Secretary reported receipt of certi~ ~ fled quarterly audit report from the firm of Diehi and Company,and read balances of each Districts I funds. A notion was made by Director ~villis H.Warner seconded by Director Vernon H.Lan~enbcck and duly carried by the i3oards of Directors of Count~i Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2, 3,5,6,7,8 and 11: That the audit report for ~quarter ending September 30,1952,received from Diehi anh Company be received and ordered filed. 2.Vacotioii.roqi~.ost The Secretary read a letter from Nary -~-.. H.Gilliepia,stenographer in the offic of the Joint Administrative or~anizatiori requesting paid vacation. The Boards of Directors took the following action: hoved by Director Nelson N.Launer,seconded by Director Vincent B.Humeston and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,3 and 11: Thab tiary B.Gillisoie ermloyed b~r the Districts as Senior stenographer—Clerk in the Joint Administrative Orgarxizstion,be and she is berehy authorized to take a vacation with pay beginning November 10,1952 to and.in— cluding November 21,1952. Report of the Director Robert H.Boney,Chairman ~ro Exe~ut ive Committee ter~of the Executive Committee reported upon the meeting held on October 17, 1952,as follows: Joint_Adninis~ t~ative ~ •~•~~ 177 Amount -2— ~78 1,Relative to the Boards’request for recommendation upon filling thb vacancy created by tho resignation of the Chief Engineer and GeneralManager,the Committee reviewed the nan~,~actors facing the Districts in establishing sound administration arid o~ar4iz~t~on o4~the ~oint Districts’ program.~f~pr ~o s~dQ~tiron of qu~~ications of men who had applied ~or bhe po~itiQn,~the Committee unanimously recommended the employment of hr.Lee N.Nelson as Chief Engineer and General Manager upon a trial basis at the monthly salary of ~l,OOO.OO per month,and that regular emoloyment and amount of salary be deter~ined by mutual agreement between the Districts and Mr.Nelson within a period not to exceed six months,Mr.Boney reported the Conriittee had been advised b~’~r.Nelson that if the Districts desired his services,he could report for duty about November let. Director P~oney stated that Mr,Nelson had previously been interviewed by a three man Committee comprised of Director Warner,Director Warden and ~oimer Director Reed.Director Warner was called upon for :i~urbhor information as to the background of Mr.Nelson. Director Warner reported that at the tine Mr.Nelson appeared before the Committee he was employed by the City of Rochester,Minnesoba as Chief of the Utilities Commission, that he is a registered civil and electrical engineer and has now gone into private consulting work.Director Warner stated that Mr.Nelson enjoys a wide reputation as a very able nan,oven tempered and with the ability to work with and.,~ot along with people in very complex situations;that his qualifications would well fit him for the position now open whore there will be a voln;!c of administrative work the Manager will be called upon to carry out, 2.Chairman Boney reported that the Committee had held over the business of making a recommendation on the requested annexation.be County Sanitation District No.3,until all information would be available and a report received from the J.C.S. Employment of The Boards of Directors took the Chief Eiig~ineer followinp~action~ and Geneial -~ Manager~Moved by Director J.L.McBride, secondea by Director Don B.Haibor and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sani tation Districts Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and 11: That the report of the Executive Committee be approved and accepted;and that Mr.Leo N.Nelson be and he is hereby employed as Chief Engineer and General Manager for County Sanitation Districts hoe.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and II unon a trial basis at the monthly salary of ~l,OOO.OO per nonth,effective November 1,1952;and that regular employ ment and amount of salary be detormine.d by mutual agreement between the Districts and.Mr.Nelson within a period not to exceed six months. Director C.H.Nelson,Cha~m~ian of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.6 stated that inasmuch as Mr.Lee M.Nelson is his cousin,ho believed it to he only ethical to sever his connections with the Districts and that he would resi~gn as a member of the Board of his District. -3— 179 Report of the Director Warner,Chairman of the Finance Committee Finance Committee reported that the Committee had been working upon the agreement with the engineers;but,since the last meeting,business affairs of members of the Committee had made it impossible to hold vo~’y many meetings together for the purpose of studying de~ils of the contract,and as they felt this should be given very careful consideration and a draft of the contract prepared and mailed to the Directors ahead of the joint meeting of the Boards,the Committee recommended that their report be heLd over and made a special matter of business at the regular meeting of the Boards on November 12,l9~2;that previous to ti~1s meeting,the Corim:~ttee could have the contract prepared in detail and sent to the Directors, The Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director Nelson N.Launer,seconded by Director Norman H.Miller a~id duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7 and l1~ That the report of th.e Finance Committee be approved and accepted. _____ Director Boney requested that the __________ officiel action of the Executive Committee relative to employment of legal counsel for the Districts be read from the minutes of the meeting of the Executive Committee;and that the resolution authorizing employment of Mr.Nisson he read~ At the request of the Chairman,the Secretary read the following excerpt from the minutes of the meeting of the Executive Committee h~id on October 3,l9~2: Robert H.Honey (Chairman) Thomas J.I~adington,alternate ~or Mr.Hugh ~J.~Jarden 5.L.McBride,alternate for hr.Courtney H.Chandler Bradon Finch C.N.Nelson Vincent L.Hurieston Others present:Raymond H.Ribal B.5.Marks K.J.Harrison Ora Mae Merritt,Secretary After a full discussion upon the employment of an attorney for the Districts,a motion was made,duly seconded and carried,that recommendation be made to the Districts’Boards that C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.be employed as the attorney for the Districts at the rate of ~3~.OO per month,providing Mr.Nisson “terminates his employment as the City Attorney for Tustin.~’ The Secretary read Resolution No.98,authorizing employ ment of C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.as legal counsel for ti-ic Joint Adriin— istrativo Organization of the eight County Sanitation Districts, adopted by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts, Nos.1,2,3,~,6,‘7,6 and 11 on October 10,l9~1.This resolutiot was carried in full in the condensed minutes of the meeting of October 10,i9~1 which were approved by the Boards o~October 214, l9~l. Business held over: re:clarification of ten~is of eniploy— i~nt of lO~a1 ~coürthel Directors present: “fl The Chairman called upon Mr.Nisson for a report upon the terms of his employment.Mr.Nisson reported that ho had no knowledge of the Executive Committee minutes and that he had not been asked by anyone to agree to terms of employment other than those contained in Resolution No.98;that if the Boards desired his employment to be based upon the terms contained in the 1~xccu- tive Committee minutes,h~would then report his decision. There followed a full discussion by the Directors as to whether or not there night be a conflict in services performed by the legal counsel in serving a city and the Districts. The Boards of Directors took t}.ie following action: hbved by Director Nilford N.Del-il,seconded by Director Hugh W.‘Jardon~ - That hr.Nissont s employment as Legal Counsel for the Districts ho confirmed in accordance with Resolution No.98,adopto by the Boards of Directors of County SaLutation Districts lbs.1,2: 3,~,6,7,8 and 11 on October 10,1952. Director Bone~y spoke to the notion,stating that at the time the Committee recommended I-fr.hisson’s emr~loyrient,names of other attorneys presented to the Committee wore e1ii~~inated from consideration because they were attorneys for cities within the Districts;and that hr.Nisson’s marie was considered only because they were inforTiethhe would resign as rho attorney for the City of Tustin if ap~ointcd legal counsel for the Districts. Director Langenbeck stated that ho had been aware of the fact that hr.hisson had not rosigncd as attorney for Tustin,but realized that it is difficult for a city to appoint an attorney upon short notice and that he had not raised the question as to the terms of Ifr.Nissan’s employment until the city had had suf:~iciont tine to appoint a successorto hr.Nisson. hi’.Nisson stated that if the majority of the Boards desired that he make a decision to continue his employment in accordance with the recommendations contained in the minutes,of the Executive Coi~n~iittoo’s meeting,he would offer his resignation as legal counsel to the Districts,affective as of October 31,1952. The Chairman called for roll call vote upon the motion: The veto was polled by roll call vote by Districts and the Secretary reported the notion lost by the following vote: BOARD OF TIRRCTQHS DISTRICT NO.1 Ayes:Directors Milford N.Dahi,and J.L. —~ McBride l’focs:Director ~.‘Jil1is H.Warner Absent:None BOARD OF DIRhC~{ORS DISTRICT i’~O 2 Ayes:Directors Hugh N.l~arden and Charles H.Stevens Noes:Directors Robert H.Boney,Don B. Haiber,Willis H.Warner and Nilliam H.ilirstein Absent:Director Frank J.Schweitzer,Jr. -5- i81 BOARD 0?DIRECTOE~S DISTRICT NO.3 Ayes;i~i~ectors Hugh N.Warden,Nelson N,~a~uaor,C.R.Miller and joseph Wobbor Noes:Director Willis H.Warner Absent:None BOARD OF DIRECTONS DiSTRICT NO.~Ayes:None V Noes:Directors Bradon Finch,Noruan H.Nillor and Willis H.Warner Absent.:None / BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.6 - Ayes:None _______ Noes:Directors C.N.Nelson,Willis r.. ~Ja~cr and Norman 1.1 Miller Absent:None BOAR])OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.7 /Ayes:Directors Vincent L.Hur-toston and J.L.McBride Noes:Director Willis H.Warner Absent:None BOARD OF DIRTIETORS DISTRICT NO.8 Ayes:Director Harold E.Edwards --- Noes:Director Willis H.Warner Absent:Director John R.Cropper DOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT_HO.11 Ayes:None ____V V Noes:Directors Willis H.Warner, Vernon B.Langonbeck and Roy SoahriVd5e Absent:None After announcement of the vote,the Chairman requested the legal course 1 ~state the rule as to the status of a tie vote,hr.Nisson reported that in thu event of a tic vote,the motion would he lost. Mr.Mis son offered his ros1V~naflon as legal counsel for the Districts,to hucoi~c effective October 31,l9~2.. The Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Diroctor~Willis H.Warner,seconded.by Director Vernon B.Langonbock: That the resignation of Mr.C.Arthur Nisson,as legal counsel for the D:Lstric~s,be accepted,effective as of October 31,l9~2. The vote was polled by roll call vote by Districts and the Secretary roported the motion lost by tl1c following vote: POARD OF DIRECTORS pISTRICTj’~Q.J~_~~Ayes:Director Willis H.Warner V V Noes:Directors J.L.McBride and Milford N,Dahi Absent:None BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT No.2 Ayes:Directors Robert H.Honey,Don .h. —_____——— Fai b~r,111111 ~11 J ~rne r dud Wi]L:Lam H,1-lirsteim Noes :Directors Ru~1~V.j Warden and Charles E,Stevens Absent:Director Frank J.SchweItzcr,Jr. ~82 BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.3 Ayes:~nc~ctor Vililis H.Warner Noes:Directors Hugh W.Warden,Nelson M. Launer,C.S.Miller and Joseph Webb cr Ab~3cnt:None BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT No.5 Ayes;~iroctors Braden Finch,Noniian H. Miller and ~Jullis H.Warner Noes:None Absent:None BOARD OF ..IREOTORS DISTRICT NO.6 Ayes:Directors C.N.Nelson,Braden Finch and Willis H.Warner Noes:None Absent:None BOARD OJ’DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.7 Ayes:Director Willis H.iiarnor Noes:Directors Vincent L.Hurieston and J.L.Mc1ride Absent:None BOARD OF DIR~CToHS DISTRICT NO 8 Ayes:Director Willis H.~Jarnor Noes:Uirector harold 1.Edwards Absent:Director John H.Cropper BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.11 Ayes:Directors ~iJu1lis H,Warner,Vernon — B.Langonbeck and Roy Soabridgo Noes:None Absent:None Clarification.of ____ Director Warner led a discussion or prov~~~ITo~ _____ the notion passed by the Boards on rolativcTho bTr~-October C,1952,which would torn inafT~Ti of employees mate the.Districts I employees as 3~Octo~of November 1,1952 and provided for vacation corij~ionsurato with length of service,Director ‘farmer stated that the E>~ecutive C,oririittoo had reviewed this eLation and the effect it would have upon the compJ.otion of District Nos,1 and 6 lines,and offered the suggestion that the Dis ~ricts’employees be retained until the arrival of Mr.Lee N.Nelson for his determination as to the termination date of the employees whose services would no longer be needed;and that the previous notion be rescinded and another passed by the Boards specifically setting forth a method for computing paid terminal vacations,rocoririending that such a formula follow as nearly as possible the County’s policy of granting paid vacation to per di~n employees,except that no terminal vacation be given unless the employee had worked for three months or longer in the service of the Districts. After a general discussion,~Boards of Directors took the followin~~action: Moved by Director J.L.McBride,seconded by Director Roy Seabridge and duly carried by the toards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11: —7-. ~83 That the following notion adopted by the Boards of Directors on October 8,i9~2: “Th~the present employees ci’the joinb Districts be retained until November 1,1952 and that they be given vacatio~ comriensurato with the length of onployment,based upon two weeks per year.” be and the sari®is hereby rescinded, Authorizing paid The Boards of Directors took the torriinal vacai following action: Moved by Director Bugh i;J•‘~iarden,seconded by Director Joseph Webbor and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts ~os.J~,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11: That terminal vacations for employees involuntarily lcavini the services of the Districts after October 31,1952 be calcu lated on the basis of one day’s paid vacation for each 20 days worked;that said terninal vacation pay be paid from the fund or funds that the emolovee’s salary has been charged to during the course of his employment in the saiie ratio of past payment, and that 21 working days per month he used for coriput:Lng daily rates of pay. The Chair recognized Hr.Kenneth.Perry,employed by the Districts as Assistant Engineer,hr.Perry,requested the Districts consideration of two weo~s advance notice for employees being involuntarily released from their’employmon with the Districts. The Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director R~y Scabridr~e,seconded by Director Vernc E.Lan~cnhock and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts ~os,1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11: That two weeks’advance notice be given each employee before scivorarjco of employment by the Districts. i\E~I BUsINESS: 1.Reaffirmation of Director Bonoy requested the coiitract with ~oards~consideration of roaffir— ~ruhT~g the contract with Hoaly Company _______ Tibbitts corleany for the con struction of the marine section of the ocean outfall to the full 7,000 foot;stating that the tine limit for reaffirmation would expire on Noveribor 3,1952. After a general discussion,the Boards of Directors adopted.Resolution No.231,determining th.o length of the ocean outfall sower (marine section)and directing County Sanitation District No.1 •bo so erocead with the construc tion.Certified copies of this Resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. -8— 18 ~ 2.Extension of time Chairman Finch reported that the 30-day f5r submission of extension of tine for submission of final ~I~in~n~plans and specifications agreed upon by specf:~c~~ons the Districts and the design engineers would expire November 1,1952.The Boards of Directors took the fol1owin~action: Movod by Director Willis H.1iiarnor,seconded by Director Robert H..Honey and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11: That the Boards of Directors hereby request the privi— logo of holding in.abeyance work on the plans and spcici fication.s for an additional 15 days from October 30,1952, the expiration date of work suspension requested by the Boards on October 1,1952 and granted by the engineers on that date;and that the time for completion of plans and specifications by the design ungineers be extended 15 days, Mr.John A.Carollo,representing the design engineers, approved and agreed.to the extension requested by the Boards. 3.Proposed Review Director Vincent L.Hu~meston proposed, of ostinatosby as a method of expediting the business, a_consulting of the Districts and in the interest ~of posit~v dcturinin~ton that the _______-V bond funds available are insufficient to construct the joint facilities under the original bond proeosal plan that a consulting engineering firn be employed to review the estimates. The Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director Vincent L.Humeston,seconded by Director Milford W.Dahi: That the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County employ a reputable ongin ri.nc~fir~n to review the current status of the bond engineer’s plan to determine whether or not the proposed modification recomriended by the Finance Committee wi]j best survu the aeods of the Districts in relation to the bond plan. The Chairman called for discussion of ttie motion and Director Warner expressed tho opinion that a motion for employment should state terms arid conditions and author ization for payment of services rendered;and recommended that the notion include instructions for securing proposals from consulting engineering fin~is as the basis of payment. Director Warner offered a suhst:Ytute motion for consider ation,and with the consent of the mover and the seconder the following motion was substituted for the original motion, and was duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts i’IOS.1,2,3,5,6,7 arid 11: That Directors Humeston and Warden ho designated as a Committee of two and that they ho instructed to secure a definite proposal from some competent engineering firm for services they deem necessary in the review of the bond plan and the modification plan and that the Committee so desig nated report back to the Boards at the earliest possible time. 185 L1..Availability of A discussion was hold upon the possibility bbnd proposal of calling for bids under the bond proposal j5lansforusoin plan.Mr.John A.Carollo reported that all calling for bids plans and specifications under the bond proposal plan,excepting the treatment plant,were now complete and available and that the treat ment plant plans and specifications were 6O~6 complete,and sug~ostcd that the Boards consider calling for bids on the completed ~ians in order to determine the amount of funds then available for the treatment plant.Director Warner requested jvjp Ribal’s opinion on the roconncndation of Mr. Carollo.Mr.Riba].stated that he had always hold that bids should be called :ror and concurred in this procedure to detcrmil.TLO costs;but that he could see nothing wrong with the revi~w as suggested by Mr.}Iuneston, The Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director Willis H.Warner,seconded by Director i’Torman H.Miller and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3, ~,6,7 and 11: That the des i~r~engineers ho roques tad to present plan.s and specifications for the )~ushard Street Trunk and Treatment Plant Trunk Sewers to tile Districts before the next meeting of the Boards,on October 29,l9~2. Mr.Rihal stated that ho had reviewed the plans and specifications on the Ellis Av~nue Trunk Sewer and rccori— mendod correlation of certain items in the specifications; and,at the request of Director heibor,itemized the correlations which ho stated to he of’dimensional nature. Report of the Chief Mr.Rihal road his report and recom E~ngineor ~riendations to the Directors.This report Manager is on file in.the office of the Secretary. ________ The Boards of Directors took the following action upon the recommendations contained in the written roport of the Chief Engineer and General Manager: 1.Authorizing Raymond A motion was :aade by Director Willis H. M.lbo sign Warner,seconded by Director Roy Seabridgo eortoinpa~ers and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2, 3,~,6,7,B u~d 11:. That Raymond N.Hertel,employed as Supervising Engineer by the join.t County Sanitation Districts,be and ho is hereby authorized to approve time curds,sign the payroiLl and warraat domendn,si.gn letters requesting the County Auditor to transfer such funds as may be necessary for the pajmont of obligations,oversee the work now under coustruct:Lon,certify progress pa~ents,prepare and sign engrinoor’s certificates and Lstlnates during the tine that Rareaond H.R:Lbal,Chief Bn~ine~r’and Genera].Manager is on vacation and until such tine us IlIr.Ribal’s successor arrives. -10 — A motion was riado by Dirictor Willis H.Warner,seconded by Director J,L. MeBrido and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos,1,2, 3,~5,6,7,and ii: That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 hereby authorizo Ha~uond N.Hortol,Suporvisin~.~ginoer,to fill the vacanc~ created by the r’esir~riatiori of Carl S.Starnos,by employing Jack H • ~1oime r as engineering aide at the salary of’~~3O3 ~OO por month for the period October 27th to October 31,1952, inclus ivo, The Chai.nhian called upon Mr.Ribal ____ for a report upon the adequacy of thL. _________ staff of the Districts to perform thc _____ prolir~inary engin ring work when ______ construction work is started on the _______ ocean outfall.Mr.Rihal reported that the present surv~iy crew would b~ enr.~aed on the wo.r’k now under cons true bion for Districts Moe.1 and 6,and that theee would be a need for a survey crew for prelir~1r~ai~y t~iork on the ocean outfall sower. A notion was made by Director Willis I-I.Warner, scco:cdod by Director C.H.Miller arid duly carried by the Boards of ~D1rectors of County Sahetation Districts Nos.1, 2,3,5,6,7 and 11: That the Boards of DirectOrs of County Sanitation Districts Nos.:i,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 hereby ask the d.;ir~r~ onyi~o’~rs to purfon~the g’encua].supervision on cons tructio~ of the ~earinu section of the acear outfall sower,under the turmu of their contract,and that they supervise the necessary prcllmnary oneinoering work as a courtesy to the Districts;and that the design engineers,Harrison &Woolley and Headman,Ferguson &Carcilo,he paid by the County Sanitation Districts for ‘the field party required for ‘this work while the final contract ~ci.th then is being worked out. Hr.itarrison,representing the design engineers,stated that they wore t’r:LlLlng tO gr~~i~t tI.LC i’L:qUJe t.of the Dis tricts for the perform::.~-~cu of servic us reqai.red. The Boards of .i)Irac bars took the foilo~iing ac t~on: hovoci by Director Roy Soabrid~u,seconded by Director Charles H.htevons and duly carried: That this ~~icetin~be actjourned to the hour of 8:00 p.m.,on October 29,1952 in Roorl 239 cit iioL~.West kighth Sbru~b,Santa Aria,California. ~!horeupon,ti-ic Cheini.an d;clared the rmioting so acLjournod at 10:20 p .ii. 2,Authorizing cmp1o~icnt of Jack R.~oir~cr — 186 Authori zing Harrison &Woolley ot al to SU~U rv is C the p re 1 iriinary wo rk on the 6~.~ri o~uff~1l S owor —11 — ~87 -~~ Chairman,Board of Directors County Sanitation District No.5 Oran~o County,California ATTEST: ~~ S~croGary,i-~oara oi Diroctors County Sanitation District No.5 Oror~~o County,Ga~.ifornia -12 — 198 RESOLUTION NO.231_5 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.5 CF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,DETERMINING THE LENGTH OF THE OCEAN OUTFALL SE~’)ER (MARINE SECTION)AND DIRECTING COUNTY SAI’T1TATION DIST~IC2 i\O.1 OF ORAN’IE COUNTY TO SC PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION. WHEREAS:County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 of Orange County,California by Resolution 206 dated August 6,1952,directed said District No.1 to award a contract to Mealy Tibbitts Construction Company for the construction of the Ocean Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)and WHEREAS:said award of contract was made on the condition tha the length of the outfall be confirmed within sixty (60)days from the date of ~he contract,and NHEREAS:said sixty (60)day period will expire on November 3 1952,now therefore,be it RESOLVRi):that County Sanitation District No.5 of Orange County,California does hereby find and determine that the Ocean Outfall Sewer (1’Iarine Section)be constructed to Station 70 /00 as shown on the plans arid specifications therefor adopted by Resolutio No.l7L~-5 of the Board of Directors of last said District. FURTHER R2~SOLVED:that County Sanitation District No.1 of Orange County,California acting as Contracting Agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos.2,3,5,6,7 and 11 be and is hereby directed to reaffirri the provision of the contract with the Mealy Tibbitts Construction Company;that the Ocean Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)be constructed to Station 70 /00 as hereinabove i-’eferred to. The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of bhe Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.5 on the 22nd day of October,1952 ~ey,Bo~of Di~éctors County Sanitation i)is~rict No.5 Orange County,California -l - 189 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ss COUNTY OF ORANGE I,ORA MAE MERRITT,Secretary of the Bbard of Directors of County Sanitation District ~oa 5 of Orange County,California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.5 of Orange County,California,held on the 22nd day of’October ,1952 by the following roil call v~’i~e; AYES:Directors Braden Finch,Norman H.Miller and Willis H.Warner NOES:None ABSENT:None IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of County Sanitation District No.5 of Orange County,California thIs 22nd day of October ,1952. Secretary,Board ~iJirect~ors County Sanitation District No.5 Orange County,California —2