HomeMy WebLinkAboutDistrict 03 Minutes 1952-10-22MINUTES OF RI~tGULAR MEETING
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION IDISTRICT NO.3
ORANGE COUNTY,CALl ~ORNIA
October 22,1952 at 8:00 p.m.
Room 239,llOL~West Eighth Street
Santa Aria,California
The Board of Directors riot in regular session at the hour of
8:00 p.m.,October 22,1952 i~i Room 239 at iiOL1.~Jest bighth Street,
Santa Ana,Califora-~.a.
Chain~ian ~Pinch called blie joint meeting of the Districts’
Boards to order at 8:00 p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of
the Board to he present.
Directors present:Hugh W.Warden (0hairman),Nelson
M.Launer,Willis I-I.Warner,
C.R.Miller and Joseph Webber
Directors absent:None
Others Present:Raymond II.Ribal,Chief Engineer and
General Manager
C.Arthur Jsson,Jr.
Harry Ashton
John A•Caroilo
J.A.~Joolley
K.J.:arrison
Raymond ~ortel
1Jaif;er Ra~~sey
Koimeth k~erry
l4alter Chaffee
Ora Mae Merritt,Secietary
Approval of The Boards of Directors of County Sani
Minutes tation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,7 and:
11 took the following action:
Moved by Director ~~!illis H.warner,seconded by Director
Willia~c~H.Rirstein and duly carried:
That the minutes of the pleetinls held on October 1 and
October 8,l9~2 be approved as mailed out.
-1—
Correspondence,
Coiiriunic at :~ons
and reports filed
~i7J2
The Bo~xi~1s of Direcbors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos,l,2,3,.5,6,
7 an~11 took the following action:
1.C~uar:;c:~1y io~Jib The Secretary reported receipt of certi
C is d qu ante 1’1 y audi t rep or t Cr on the
firm of Diehi and Company,and read
balances of each Districts’funds.
A motion was made by Director ~iillis H.Warner seconded
by Director Vernon E.Langenback and duly carried by the
Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Hoe.1,2,
3,5,6,7,3 and 11:
That the audit report Co ntbr quarter ending Septenber
30,1952,received from Diehi and ~:onpany be received and
ordered filed.
2.Vacation.request The Secretary read a letter from Mary
___-
E.Gillisnia,stenographer in the off ic
of the Joinc Administrative or~anizatiori requesting paid
vacation,
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
Moved by Director Nelson H.Launer,seconded by Director
Vincent L.Humeston and duly carried by the Boards of
Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,3
and 11:
That Mary E.Gillispie ermloyed by the Districts as
Senior Stenograp her-Clerk in the Joint Administrative
0rgar~ization,be and she is hereby authorized to take a
vacation with pay beginning November 10,1952 to and in
cluding Bover~her 21,l9~2.
~ort of the
-~
Execut lye Committee
1952,as follows:
Director Robert H.Boney,Chairman pro
ton of the Executive Cor-1nittee reported
upon the meeting held on October 17,
Joint Admlnis~
Moved by ~irector Hugh W.~Jarden,seconded by Director
William H.Hirstein a~d du’y carried;
That the Joint Administrative ~arr~nt Register be approve
for signature and payment of:
War rant
Demand No.In Favor Of
_____
JA -L~.o 3
L~05
L~06
L107
Davis Stationers
Dennis Printers
Eleen-Line Corporation
Standard Oil Company of California
F.B.Narwood,Postmaster
Amount
1.68
15.31
3.52
32.75
30.00
83.26
-2—
~f~3
1.Relative to the Boards!.requ~sb for re~orwiendation upon
filling the vacancy c~reated by the resignation of the Chief
Engineer and General Manager,the Corn ittee reviewed the
nari:~factors facing the Districts in establishing sound
adninistration and o~’g~niz~.tion of the joint Districts’
program.Afjer ~Qr1s~d~ra~4on of qu~i~ications of men who
had applied,for the pos~i~on,the Committee unanimously
reco~meended -the employment of ~Lee N.Nelson as Chief
Engineer and General Manager upon a trial basis at the
monthly salary of ~1,OOO.OO per month,and that regular
employr:ient and amount of salary be determined bynutual
agreement between the Districts and Mr.N~lson within a
period not to exceed six months.i~r.Boney reported the
Committee had been advised by dr.Nelson that if the
Districts desired his services,ha could report for duty
about Noveiiber 1st.
Director }~onay stated that hr.Nelson had previously been
interviewed by a three man Committee comprised of Director
Warner,Director Warden and :~omar Director Heed.Director
Warner was called upon for further information as to the
ba~kground of Mr.Nelson.
Director Warner reported that at the tine Mr.Nelson
ap~eared before the Committee he was employed by the City
of Rochester,Ninneso~a as Chief of the LTtilities Commission:
that he is a registered civil and electrical engineer and
has now gone into private consulting work.Director i~iarner
stated that Mr.Nelson enjoys a wide reputation as a very
able man,oven tempered and w~th the ability to work with
and ot along with people in very complx situations;that
his qualifications would well fit h~n for the position now
onen whore there will be a volue~o of administrative work
ti-ic Manager will be called unon to carry out.
2.Chairman Boney reported that the Committee had held over
the business of making a recommendation on the requested
annexation to County Sanitation District No.3,until all
information would be available and a report received from
the J.C.S.
-
Employment of The Boards of Directors took the
Chiof±vginc~r foflowin action
and Sreneral
-
lianager ~ovco by Director J L i’icBride,
--
seconded by Director Don B..‘.Haibar
and duly carried by the Soards of Directors of County Sani
tation Districts Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and 11:
That the report of the Executive Committee be approved
and accepted;•and that Mr.Leo N.Nelson be and he is
hereby employed as Chief Engineer and General Manager for
County Sanitatibn Districts Fos.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and 11
unon a trihi basis at the monthly salary of f~l,OOO.OO per
month,effective November 1,1952;and that regular eriploy—
mont and amount of salary be determined by mutual agreement
between the Districts and i-in.holson within a period not
to exceed six months,
Director C.N.Nelson,Cha~rnan of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No.6 stated that
inasmuch as Mr.Lee N.Nelson is his cousin,he believed it
to he only ethical to sever his connections with the
Districts and that he would resign asa nenber of the Board
of his District.
—3—
Report of the Director warner,Chainna~of the
Finance Com~~Finance Committee reported that
the Committee had been working
upon the agreement with the engineers;but,since the last
meeting,business affairs of members of the Cor~iittee had
made it jmpossib~e tQ hold ve~r many meetings together for
the purpose of study~,ng d~a~ls of the contract,and as they
felt this should be given very careful consideration and a
draft of the contract prepared and mailed to the Directors
ahead of the joint meeting of the Boards,the Coririittec
recommended that their repoi*be held over and riade a special
matter of.business at the regular meeting of tt~e Boards on
November 12,1952;that previous to tials meeting,the
Comri:~.ttee could have the contract prepared in detail and sent
to the Directors.
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
Moved by Director Nelson N.Launer,seconded by Director
Norman H.Miller and duly carried by the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts Nose 1,2,3,5,6,7 and 1U
That the report of the Finance Committee be approved and
acc opted.
_____
Director Boney requested that the
_____
officisi action of the Executive
__________
Committee relative to eniplo~maont
of legal counsel for the Districts
be read from the minutes or the
meeting of the Executive Coriniittee;and that the resolution
authorizing employment of hr.Nisson he read.
At the request of the Chairman,the Secretary road the
following excerpt from the minutes of the meeting of the
Executive Committee held on October 3,1952:
Hobart b.Boney (Chairman)
Thomas 5.Eadington,alternate
for Mr.Hugh 1.~Jarden
J.L.McBride,alternate for
hr.Courtney R.Chandler
Braden Finch
C.N.Nelson
Vincent L.Hurioston
Others present:Raymond H.Ribal
B.J.Marks
K.J.Harrison
•
Ora Mae Merritt,Secretary
After a full discussion upon the employment of an
attorney for the Districts,a notion was made,duly seconded and
carried,that recommendation be made to the Districts’Boards that
C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.be employed as the attorney for the Districts
at the rate of ~355.O0 per month,providing hr.Nisson “terminates
his emplo~ent as the City Attorney for Tustin.”
The Secretary read Resolution No.98,authorizing employ
ment of C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.as legal counsel for the Joint Adriin~
istrative Organization of.the eight County Sanitation Districts,
adopted by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts,
Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11 on October 10,1951.This reso1utio~
was carried in full in the cohdonsed minutes of the meeting of
October 10,1951 which were approved by the Boards on October 2L~,
1951.
17~
Business hold ovc~
re:clarification
of terms of employ—
mont of ~~~ii~T
Directors present:
——
~-iT5
The Chairman called upon Mr.Nissan for a ropor~uPofl
tfic terms of hiS employment.Mr.Nisson reported that he had no
knowledge of the Executive Committee minutes and that ho had not
been asked by anyone to agree to tones of employment other than
those contained in Resolution No.98;that if the Boards desired
his employment to be based upon the terms contained in the :txocu—
tive Committee minutes,hq wou]~d then rcpor~his decision.
There followed a full discussion by the Directors as to
whether or not there night be a conflict in services performed by
the legal counsel in serving a city and the Dis bricts.
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
bayed by Director Milford N,Dahl,seconded by Director
Hugh W.~Jardcn~
That Mr.Nissan’s employment as Legal Counsel for the
Listricts be confirmed in accordance with Resolution No.98,adopto
by the Boards of Directors of County Sa:~ibatiori Districts Nos.1,2:
3,~,~,7,8 and 11 on October 10,i9~2.
Director Eoney spoke to t:h.o motion,stating that at the
tine the Conr~ittoe reconr’~onded hr.Nisson’s onoloymont,names of
other attorneys presented to the Committee were eliminated from
consideration hc;ca~.se they were attorneys for cities within the
Districts;and that en’.~name was considered only because
they wure informed he wquld resign as the attorney for the City of
Tustin if appointed legal counsel for the Districts.
-
Director Lari:~enheck stated that ho had been aware of the
fact that Mr.Mi~son had-not resigned as attorney for Tustin,hut
realized that it is difficult for a city to appoint an attorney
upon short notice and that he had nob raised the question as to the
terms of hr.Hiss on’s employment until the city had bad sufficient
time to apDoint a successor to hr.Misson.
Mr.Nisson stated that if the majority of the Boards
desired that ho make a decision to continue his employment
in accordance with the recommendations contained in the
minutes of the Executive Comruttects meeting,he would offer
his resignation as legal counsel to the Districts,affective
as of October 31,l9~2.
The Chairman called for roll call vote upon the notion:
The vote was polled by roll call vote by Districts and
the Secretary reported the motion lost by the following vote:
BOAi~D OF TIp1~TCRS
DISTRICT NO.1 Ayes:Directors Milford N.Dahi,and J.L.
McBri do
Noes:Director Willis H.Warner
Absent:None
BOARD OF DIRiCTORS
DISTRICT MO 2 Ayes:Directors Hugh w.Warden and
--
Charles H.Stevens
Noes:Directors Robert H.Boney,Don B.
Haibor,Willis H.Warner and
Wil].iam H.Hirstein
Absent:Director Frank J.Schweitzer,Jr.
-5—
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.3 s;~4~eetors Hugh N.Warden,Nelson
N.La~ner~C.R.Miller and Joseph
Wobbor
Noes:Director Willis H.Warner
Absent:None
BOARD OF OIR”TC~
DISTRICT NO.~
—
Ayes;None
Noes;Directors F3radon Finch,Nornan
H.Miller and Willis H.Warner
Absent:None
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT MO.6 Ayes:None
Noes:Directors C.N.Nelson,Wil1~s i~.
Warrior and Norman H.Miller
Absent:None
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.7 Ayes:Directors Vincent L.Hurieston and
J.L.Me Br ide
Noes:Director Willis H.Warner
Absent:None
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DI•SfR:LCT NO.8 Ayes:Director Ha:coid E.Edwards
-
Noes:Director Willis H.Warner
Absent:Director John R.Cropper
BOARD OF DIRiE:;TORS
DISTRICT_NO.11 Ayes:None
Noes:Directors Willis H.Warner,
Vernon B.Langeribock and Roy
Seabrice
Absent:None
After announconent of the vote.,the Cbairrian requested
the legal counsel to state th.e rule as to the status of a tie
vote.hr.Nissori reported that in tN..~event of a tie vote,tbe
motion TiJcjUld be lost.
Mr.Nissan offered his rosi~nation as legal counsel for the
Districts,to hecoaio effective October 31,l9~2,
The Boards of D:Lrectors took the following action:
Moved by Director Willis H.Warner,seconded by Director
Vernon E.Langonbock:
That tJ.ie resignation of Mr.C.Arthur Nissan,as legal counsel
for the DistricUs,be accepted,effective as o1 October 31,l9~2.
The vote was polled by roll call vote by Districts and the
Secretary reported the notion lost by ti~~following vote:
BOARD OF I)IRE(JTOHS
DiSTRiCT NO,l ‘~yos°DJrLcUor Wilis H tamer
________-.
Noes:Directors J.B.McBride and
Mi:Lrord N.Dciii
Absent:NOne
BOARD OF i)I~h~CTORS
DISTJ.UCT NO •
2 Ayes:Directors Robert H.Honey,Don N.
La~ber,
Nillis H.Warrior and
wi:L:Licul H.I-brstein
Noes:Directors Hugh W.Warden and
Charles B.Stevens
Absent:Director Frank J.Schweitzcr,Jr.
-6—
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.3 P~-r!Qctor Willis H.WarnQr
Noes:Directors Hugh 1~1.Warden,Nelson N.
Launer,C.R.Miller and Joseph
Webber
Absent:None
~3OARD OIP DIRECTORS
DISTRICT_NO.5 i~yos;t~iroctors Bradon Finch,Norman H.
Miller and Willis H.Warner
Noes:Nono
Absent:None
BOARD OF ~iRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.6 Ayes:Directors C.H.Nelson,Bradon
________-
Finch and Willis H.Warner
Noes:None
Absent:None
BOARD 0 T DIRECTORS
DISTRICT MO.7 Ayes:Director Willis H.Warner
Noes:Directors Vincent L.Huneston and
J.L.Mc3ride
Absent:None
BOARD CF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT MO 8 Ayes:Director Willis H.Warner
Noes:Dir~c ~or Harold L.Edwards
Absent:Director John H.Cropper
J3OARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.11 Ayes:Directors Willis H.Warner,Vernon
B,Lanp~onbock and Roy Suabridi~e
Noes:Mono
Absent:None
Clarification of
____
Director Warner led a discussion o~
previous action
_____
the motion passed by the Boards on
relative to tc~rm-October 3,1952,which would term
ination of employees mate the Districts’employees as
3m October 31,1~52 of November 1,1952 and provided
for vacation comriensurato with
length of service.Director ‘lamer stated that the E~ecutive
Committee had reviewed this notion and the effect it would have
upon the completion of District Nos.1 and 6 lines,and offerod
the sug~estion that the Districtsf employees be retained until
tho arrival of Mr.Lee N.Nelson for his determination as to the
termination date of the employees wnoso services would no longer
be needed;and that the previous motion be rescinded and another
passed by the Boards specifically settin~fo~’th a method for
computing paid teininal vacations,recomriendin~that such a
formula follow as nearly as possible the County’s policy of
~rantin~paid vacation to per diem employees,except that no
terminal vacation be given unless th employee had worked for
three months or longer in the service of the Districts.
After a general discussion,the Boards of Directors took
the fo1lowin,~action:
1~toved by Director J.L.McBride,seconded by Director Roy
SoabridrTe and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,.~and 11:
‘-7—
L
That the following motion adopted by the Boards of
Directors on October 8,1952:
~1That the present employees of the joint Districts be
retained until November 1,1952 and that they be given vacatio~.
commensurate with the length of employrient,based upon two
weeks per year.”
be and the same isheroby rescinded,
Authorizing paid The.Boards of Directors took the
terminal ~iacation~following,action:
Moved by Director Hugh U,i~arden,seconded by Director
Joseph hebbor and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11:
That terminal vacations for oriploycos involuntarily icavin;
the services of the Districts after October 31,1952 be calcu
lated on the basis of one day’s paid vacation for each 20 days
worked;that said terminal vacation pay be paid from the fund
on funds that the employee’s salary has been charged to during
the course of his employment in the saiie ratio of past payment,
and that 21 working days per month ho used for coraputin~daily
rates of pay.
The Chair recognized fir.Kenneth Perry,employed by the
Districts as Assistant Engineer.hr.Perry,requested the
Districts’consideration of two weeks’advance notice for
employees being involuntarily released from their employmon
with the Disbnicts.
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
Moved by Director P~oy Soabnidi;e,seconded by Director Vernc
E.Lanc~onheck and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Kos,1,2,3,5,6,7,3 and 11:
That two wooks’advance no bico be given each ermloyoo
before severance of employment by the Districts.
~BUSINESS:~
1.Reaffirmation of Director Boney requested the
contract wi th Boards cons ideration of roaffir—
Mealy Tibbitts milr;the contract with Mealy
Company
_______
Tibbitts cori~any for the con
struction of the marine section
of the ocean outfall to the full 7,000 feet;stating
that tii~time limit for reaffirmation would expire on
November 3,1952.
After a general discussion,the Boards of Directors
adopted Resolution No.231,determining the length of the
ocean outfall sewer (marine section)and directing County
Sanitation District No,1 to so eroceed with the construc
tion,Certified copies of this Resolution is attached
hereto and made a part of those minutes.,
-5—
2.Extension of time Chairman Finch reported tHat the 30-day
for submIssion of extension of tine for submission of
final_plans~~plans and specifications agreedupon by
~pecifications the Districts and the de~Lgn engineers
would expire November 1,1952.The
Boards of Directors took the fo1lowin~action;
Moved by Director Willis H,Warner,seconded by D~roctor
Robert H.Bonoy and duly carried by the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11:
That the Boards of Directors hereby request the privi—
logo of holding in abeyance work on the plans and speci
fications for an additional 15 days from October 30,1952,
the expiration date of work suspension requested by the
Boards on October 1,1952 and granted by th~engineers on
that date;and that the timo for completion of plans and
specifications by the design engineers be extended 15 days,
Mr.John A.Carollo,representing the design engineers,
approved and agreed to the extension requested by the Boards.
3.~!2~~d Review Director VinOont L.Huraeston proposed,
of estimates by as a method of expediting bhe business,
a_consulting of the Districts and in the interest
Ln~1necrIr1g S Lrm of positi ~determination that the
bond funds available are insufficient
to construct the joint facilities under the original bond
pronosal plan that a consulting engineering firn be employed
to review the estimates.
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
Moved by Director Vincent L.Hurieston,seconded by
Director Milford W.Dahi:
That the County Sanitation~~atricts of Orange County
employ a reputable engineering fin~i to review the current
status of the bond engineer’s plan to determine whether or
not the iroposod modification recommended by the Finance
Committee will best serve the o~ods of the Districts in
relation to the bond plan.
The Chairman cal~Lod for discussion of the motion and
Director Warner expressed the opinion that a notion for
cmployiriont should state terms and conditions and author
ization for payment of services rendered;and recommended
that the motion include instructions for securing proposals
from consulting engineering firms as the basis of payment.
Director Warner offered a substitute motion for consider
ation,and with the consent of the mover and the seconder
the following motion was substituted for the original motion,
and was duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 arid 11:
That Directors Hurioston and Warden ho designated as a
Committee of two and that they ho instructed to secure a
definite proposal from some competent engineering firm for
services they doom necessary in the review of the bond plan
and the modification plan and thet the Committee so desig
nated report back to the Boards at the earliest possible
time,
—9-
A discussion was hold upon thcpo;sibility
of calling for bids under the bond proposal
plan.Mr.John A.Carollo reported that all
plans and specifications under the bond
proposal plan,exceptin~the treatment
plant,wore now com~letc and available and that the treat-~
rient plant plans and specifications were 6O~complete,and
suggested that the Boards consider cal:Ling for bids on the
completed plans in order to dotemino the amount of funds
then available for the treatment plant.Director Warner
roquestod hr.Ribel’s opinion on the recommendation of Mr.
Carollo.Mr.Ribal stated that he had always hold that bids
should be called for and concurred in.this procedure to
doterriin.o costs;but that he could sac nothing wrong with
to ruVi~w as suggested by ~Huneston,
The Boards of Directors took the following action:
Moved by Director 141111s H.Warner,seconded by
Director Norman H.Miller and,duly carried by the Boards
of Directors of County Sanitetion Districts Nos.1,2,3,
~,6,‘7 and 11:
That the design engineers be requested to present
plan.s and specifications for the :;Bushard Street Trunk and
Treatment Plant Trunk Sewers to the Districts before the
next meeting of the Boards,on October 29,l9~2.
Mr.PLihal stated that ho had reviewed the plans and
specifications on the Ellis Av~nue Trunk Sewer and recom
mended correlation of certain items in the specifications;
and,at the request of Director i..eibor,itemized the
correlations which ho stated ho he of dimensional nature.
Mr.Rihal road.hi~report and recoin
riondations to the Directors.This report
is on file ifl the office of the Secretary.
The Boards of uircctor~took the following
action upon the recommendations contained in the written
report of the Chief Engineer and General Manager:
1.AuthorizngRa~yr~ond A notion was :~ado by Director Willis H.
M.Hortel to s’~gn Warner,seconded by Director Roy Soabridge
ce~tai~n paners’and duly carried by the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts Nos,1,2,
3,~,6,7,i3 a:~d 11:
That Raymond M.Hortol,e::~.ployed as Supervising
Engincor by the joint County Sanitation Districts,be and
ho is hereby authorized to coprovo t ir’ie cards,sign the
payroll and warrant derian.de,sign.letters requesting the
County nuc tor to transfer such funds as may be necessary
for the paj~ient of obligations,oversee the work now under
coylstrucG:Lori,certify progress pa~ients,prepare and sign
engineer!a certificates and ~stiniatus during the tir~ic that
Ra.?e2ond H,Hibal,Chief En~inoui’and General Manager is on
vacat~an end until such time as Ier,Ribal’s successor
arrives,
~..Availability of
~xd proposal
—
plans for u~o in
calling for bids
Report of ‘the Chief
Engineer and +crioral
Manager
-10 —
~1~8 1
A motion was made by Dirictor Wii1i~
H.Warner,seconded by Director J.L.
Mcbride and duly carried by the
Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,
3,~,6,7,and 11:
That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 hereby authorize
Ra~ond N.Hortel,Suporvisinc ~ngineor,to fill the vacanc~’
created by the resignation of Carl S.Starnos,by employing
Jack H.~•Joiner as engineering aide at the salary of ~3O3,O0
per month for the period October 27th to October 31,1952,
inclus lye.
The Chain~ian called upon Mr.Ribal
____
for a report upon the adequacy of tiic
_________
staff of the Districts to perfor~thL
preliminary engineering work when
__________
cor~struction work is started on the
_______
ocean outfall.Mr.Hihal reported
thet the prosoub survey crow would b.
enr~aged on the work now under cons true tion for Districts
Nos.1 and 6,and that the.ee would ho a need for a survey
crow for rrolininary work on the ocean outfall sewer.
A motion was iiade by Director Willis H.Warner,
soco:odod by Director C.H.Miller and duly carried by the
Boards of Directors of County San:itation Districts Nos,1,
2,3,5,6,‘7 and 11:
That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 hereby ask the design
engi~:io~rs to perform the general supervision on constructio~.
of the marine section of the ocean outfall sower,under the
tunas of ti.ici r contract,and that they supervise the
necessary preliminary un~ineuning work as a courbesy to the
Districts;and that bhc design engineers,Harrison &Wool1e~y
and Headman,Ferguson &Carello,be paid by the County
Sanitation Districts for the field party required for this
work whi 10 tim f Wiial c o at roe wL th triem is he irig worked out
Dr.Harrison,roprosentet.ng bbe design engineers,stated
that they were i’iilling to grant the request of the Dis brie bs for
the performance of sorv:Lc Os ruqiirui.
~~~irn~ient The Boards of ~irec bors took the
fol:Looina action:
keyed by Director Roy Soahridg;,seconded by Director
Charles H.Stevens and duly carried:
That this meeting be adjourned to the hour of 8:00
on October 29,1952 in Hoer.239 at llOLj.West Dighth
Gtre~t,~anba Aria,California.
1:Jhoreupon,the Chainaan declared the meeting so
adjourned at 10:20 p
2.Authorizing emp1o~iont
of Jack H.
Authorizing harrison
~ot a1
-
to supervise the
pro 1 inlinary wo rk
~T~TFie T~ii~bYF~tT
s owe r
—11 —
~82
h~..~n,~oa d of Directors
-
/Coun j Sanitation District No.3
Orai cr,o County,California
ATTEST:
S~crotar~r,~oa~a of Dire tors
County Sanitation District No.3
o rori~~e County,Cal irornia
-12 —
RESOLUTION NO.231_3
RESOLUTION OF TUE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.OF CCTJNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO 3 OF ORANGE cOUNTY,
CALIFORNIA,DETERMINING TUE LENGTH OF THE OCEAN -
OUTFALL SEWER (MARINE SECTION)AND DIRECTING
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICI1 NO.1 OF ORANGE
COUNTY TO SO PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION.
WHE~EA3:County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,,2,3,5,6,7
and 11 of Oran~e County,California by Resolution 206 dated August
6,1952,directed said District No.1 to award a contract to Mealy
Tibbitts Construction Company t~or the construction.of the Ocean
Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)and
WHEREAS:said award of contract was made on the condition tha
the length of the outfall be confirmed within sixty (60)days from
the date of the contract,and
WHEREAS:said sixty (60)day period will expire on November 3
1952,now therefore,be it
RESOLVED:that County Sanitation District No.3 of Orange
County,California does hereby find and determine that the Ocean
Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)be constructed to Station 70 /00 a~
shown on the plans arid specifications therefor adopted by Resolutic
No.17L~-3 of the Board of Directors of last said District.
FURTHER RESOLVED:that County Sanitation District No.1 of
Orange County,California acting as Contracting Agent for itself
and County Sanitation Districts Has.2,3,5,6,7 and 11 be and is
hereby directed to reaffirm the provision of the contract with the
Mealy Tlbb:Ltts Construction Company;that the Ocean Outfall Sewer
(Marine Section)be constructed to Station 70 /00 as hereinabove
referred to.
The foregoing Resolution ~ias passed and adopted at a regular
meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No.3 on the 22nd day of October,1952
~
~ecreatry,Board ol TY.rectors
County Sanitation Disbrict No.3
Orange County,California
-1-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I,ORA MAE MERRITT,Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No,3 of Orange County~California,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed and
adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No.3 of Orange County,California,held on
the 22nd day of October
,1952 by the following roll c311 v(~te:
AYES:Directors Hugh W.Warden,Nelson M.Launer,Joseph
Webber,C.R.Miller and Willis H.Warner
NOES:None
ABSENT:None
IN ~pjrjl~33 WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
seal of County Sanitation District No.3 of Orange County,California.
this 22nd day of October
,1952.
Secretary,Board of Direc’toi~s
County Sanitation District No.3
Orange County,California
—2.-