Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDistrict 03 Minutes 1952-10-22MINUTES OF RI~tGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION IDISTRICT NO.3 ORANGE COUNTY,CALl ~ORNIA October 22,1952 at 8:00 p.m. Room 239,llOL~West Eighth Street Santa Aria,California The Board of Directors riot in regular session at the hour of 8:00 p.m.,October 22,1952 i~i Room 239 at iiOL1.~Jest bighth Street, Santa Ana,Califora-~.a. Chain~ian ~Pinch called blie joint meeting of the Districts’ Boards to order at 8:00 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board to he present. Directors present:Hugh W.Warden (0hairman),Nelson M.Launer,Willis I-I.Warner, C.R.Miller and Joseph Webber Directors absent:None Others Present:Raymond II.Ribal,Chief Engineer and General Manager C.Arthur Jsson,Jr. Harry Ashton John A•Caroilo J.A.~Joolley K.J.:arrison Raymond ~ortel 1Jaif;er Ra~~sey Koimeth k~erry l4alter Chaffee Ora Mae Merritt,Secietary Approval of The Boards of Directors of County Sani Minutes tation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,7 and: 11 took the following action: Moved by Director ~~!illis H.warner,seconded by Director Willia~c~H.Rirstein and duly carried: That the minutes of the pleetinls held on October 1 and October 8,l9~2 be approved as mailed out. -1— Correspondence, Coiiriunic at :~ons and reports filed ~i7J2 The Bo~xi~1s of Direcbors of County Sanitation Districts Nos,l,2,3,.5,6, 7 an~11 took the following action: 1.C~uar:;c:~1y io~Jib The Secretary reported receipt of certi C is d qu ante 1’1 y audi t rep or t Cr on the firm of Diehi and Company,and read balances of each Districts’funds. A motion was made by Director ~iillis H.Warner seconded by Director Vernon E.Langenback and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Hoe.1,2, 3,5,6,7,3 and 11: That the audit report Co ntbr quarter ending Septenber 30,1952,received from Diehi and ~:onpany be received and ordered filed. 2.Vacation.request The Secretary read a letter from Mary ___- E.Gillisnia,stenographer in the off ic of the Joinc Administrative or~anizatiori requesting paid vacation, The Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director Nelson H.Launer,seconded by Director Vincent L.Humeston and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,3 and 11: That Mary E.Gillispie ermloyed by the Districts as Senior Stenograp her-Clerk in the Joint Administrative 0rgar~ization,be and she is hereby authorized to take a vacation with pay beginning November 10,1952 to and in cluding Bover~her 21,l9~2. ~ort of the -~ Execut lye Committee 1952,as follows: Director Robert H.Boney,Chairman pro ton of the Executive Cor-1nittee reported upon the meeting held on October 17, Joint Admlnis~ Moved by ~irector Hugh W.~Jarden,seconded by Director William H.Hirstein a~d du’y carried; That the Joint Administrative ~arr~nt Register be approve for signature and payment of: War rant Demand No.In Favor Of _____ JA -L~.o 3 L~05 L~06 L107 Davis Stationers Dennis Printers Eleen-Line Corporation Standard Oil Company of California F.B.Narwood,Postmaster Amount 1.68 15.31 3.52 32.75 30.00 83.26 -2— ~f~3 1.Relative to the Boards!.requ~sb for re~orwiendation upon filling the vacancy c~reated by the resignation of the Chief Engineer and General Manager,the Corn ittee reviewed the nari:~factors facing the Districts in establishing sound adninistration and o~’g~niz~.tion of the joint Districts’ program.Afjer ~Qr1s~d~ra~4on of qu~i~ications of men who had applied,for the pos~i~on,the Committee unanimously reco~meended -the employment of ~Lee N.Nelson as Chief Engineer and General Manager upon a trial basis at the monthly salary of ~1,OOO.OO per month,and that regular employr:ient and amount of salary be determined bynutual agreement between the Districts and Mr.N~lson within a period not to exceed six months.i~r.Boney reported the Committee had been advised by dr.Nelson that if the Districts desired his services,ha could report for duty about Noveiiber 1st. Director }~onay stated that hr.Nelson had previously been interviewed by a three man Committee comprised of Director Warner,Director Warden and :~omar Director Heed.Director Warner was called upon for further information as to the ba~kground of Mr.Nelson. Director Warner reported that at the tine Mr.Nelson ap~eared before the Committee he was employed by the City of Rochester,Ninneso~a as Chief of the LTtilities Commission: that he is a registered civil and electrical engineer and has now gone into private consulting work.Director i~iarner stated that Mr.Nelson enjoys a wide reputation as a very able man,oven tempered and w~th the ability to work with and ot along with people in very complx situations;that his qualifications would well fit h~n for the position now onen whore there will be a volue~o of administrative work ti-ic Manager will be called unon to carry out. 2.Chairman Boney reported that the Committee had held over the business of making a recommendation on the requested annexation to County Sanitation District No.3,until all information would be available and a report received from the J.C.S. - Employment of The Boards of Directors took the Chiof±vginc~r foflowin action and Sreneral - lianager ~ovco by Director J L i’icBride, -- seconded by Director Don B..‘.Haibar and duly carried by the Soards of Directors of County Sani tation Districts Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and 11: That the report of the Executive Committee be approved and accepted;•and that Mr.Leo N.Nelson be and he is hereby employed as Chief Engineer and General Manager for County Sanitatibn Districts Fos.1,2,3,~,6,7,8 and 11 unon a trihi basis at the monthly salary of f~l,OOO.OO per month,effective November 1,1952;and that regular eriploy— mont and amount of salary be determined by mutual agreement between the Districts and i-in.holson within a period not to exceed six months, Director C.N.Nelson,Cha~rnan of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.6 stated that inasmuch as Mr.Lee N.Nelson is his cousin,he believed it to he only ethical to sever his connections with the Districts and that he would resign asa nenber of the Board of his District. —3— Report of the Director warner,Chainna~of the Finance Com~~Finance Committee reported that the Committee had been working upon the agreement with the engineers;but,since the last meeting,business affairs of members of the Cor~iittee had made it jmpossib~e tQ hold ve~r many meetings together for the purpose of study~,ng d~a~ls of the contract,and as they felt this should be given very careful consideration and a draft of the contract prepared and mailed to the Directors ahead of the joint meeting of the Boards,the Coririittec recommended that their repoi*be held over and riade a special matter of.business at the regular meeting of tt~e Boards on November 12,1952;that previous to tials meeting,the Comri:~.ttee could have the contract prepared in detail and sent to the Directors. The Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director Nelson N.Launer,seconded by Director Norman H.Miller and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nose 1,2,3,5,6,7 and 1U That the report of the Finance Committee be approved and acc opted. _____ Director Boney requested that the _____ officisi action of the Executive __________ Committee relative to eniplo~maont of legal counsel for the Districts be read from the minutes or the meeting of the Executive Coriniittee;and that the resolution authorizing employment of hr.Nisson he read. At the request of the Chairman,the Secretary road the following excerpt from the minutes of the meeting of the Executive Committee held on October 3,1952: Hobart b.Boney (Chairman) Thomas 5.Eadington,alternate for Mr.Hugh 1.~Jarden J.L.McBride,alternate for hr.Courtney R.Chandler Braden Finch C.N.Nelson Vincent L.Hurioston Others present:Raymond H.Ribal B.J.Marks K.J.Harrison • Ora Mae Merritt,Secretary After a full discussion upon the employment of an attorney for the Districts,a notion was made,duly seconded and carried,that recommendation be made to the Districts’Boards that C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.be employed as the attorney for the Districts at the rate of ~355.O0 per month,providing hr.Nisson “terminates his emplo~ent as the City Attorney for Tustin.” The Secretary read Resolution No.98,authorizing employ ment of C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.as legal counsel for the Joint Adriin~ istrative Organization of.the eight County Sanitation Districts, adopted by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts, Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11 on October 10,1951.This reso1utio~ was carried in full in the cohdonsed minutes of the meeting of October 10,1951 which were approved by the Boards on October 2L~, 1951. 17~ Business hold ovc~ re:clarification of terms of employ— mont of ~~~ii~T Directors present: —— ~-iT5 The Chairman called upon Mr.Nissan for a ropor~uPofl tfic terms of hiS employment.Mr.Nisson reported that he had no knowledge of the Executive Committee minutes and that ho had not been asked by anyone to agree to tones of employment other than those contained in Resolution No.98;that if the Boards desired his employment to be based upon the terms contained in the :txocu— tive Committee minutes,hq wou]~d then rcpor~his decision. There followed a full discussion by the Directors as to whether or not there night be a conflict in services performed by the legal counsel in serving a city and the Dis bricts. The Boards of Directors took the following action: bayed by Director Milford N,Dahl,seconded by Director Hugh W.~Jardcn~ That Mr.Nissan’s employment as Legal Counsel for the Listricts be confirmed in accordance with Resolution No.98,adopto by the Boards of Directors of County Sa:~ibatiori Districts Nos.1,2: 3,~,~,7,8 and 11 on October 10,i9~2. Director Eoney spoke to t:h.o motion,stating that at the tine the Conr~ittoe reconr’~onded hr.Nisson’s onoloymont,names of other attorneys presented to the Committee were eliminated from consideration hc;ca~.se they were attorneys for cities within the Districts;and that en’.~name was considered only because they wure informed he wquld resign as the attorney for the City of Tustin if appointed legal counsel for the Districts. - Director Lari:~enheck stated that ho had been aware of the fact that Mr.Mi~son had-not resigned as attorney for Tustin,hut realized that it is difficult for a city to appoint an attorney upon short notice and that he had nob raised the question as to the terms of hr.Hiss on’s employment until the city had bad sufficient time to apDoint a successor to hr.Misson. Mr.Nisson stated that if the majority of the Boards desired that ho make a decision to continue his employment in accordance with the recommendations contained in the minutes of the Executive Comruttects meeting,he would offer his resignation as legal counsel to the Districts,affective as of October 31,l9~2. The Chairman called for roll call vote upon the notion: The vote was polled by roll call vote by Districts and the Secretary reported the motion lost by the following vote: BOAi~D OF TIp1~TCRS DISTRICT NO.1 Ayes:Directors Milford N.Dahi,and J.L. McBri do Noes:Director Willis H.Warner Absent:None BOARD OF DIRiCTORS DISTRICT MO 2 Ayes:Directors Hugh w.Warden and -- Charles H.Stevens Noes:Directors Robert H.Boney,Don B. Haibor,Willis H.Warner and Wil].iam H.Hirstein Absent:Director Frank J.Schweitzer,Jr. -5— BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.3 s;~4~eetors Hugh N.Warden,Nelson N.La~ner~C.R.Miller and Joseph Wobbor Noes:Director Willis H.Warner Absent:None BOARD OF OIR”TC~ DISTRICT NO.~ — Ayes;None Noes;Directors F3radon Finch,Nornan H.Miller and Willis H.Warner Absent:None BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT MO.6 Ayes:None Noes:Directors C.N.Nelson,Wil1~s i~. Warrior and Norman H.Miller Absent:None BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.7 Ayes:Directors Vincent L.Hurieston and J.L.Me Br ide Noes:Director Willis H.Warner Absent:None BOARD OF DIRECTORS DI•SfR:LCT NO.8 Ayes:Director Ha:coid E.Edwards - Noes:Director Willis H.Warner Absent:Director John R.Cropper BOARD OF DIRiE:;TORS DISTRICT_NO.11 Ayes:None Noes:Directors Willis H.Warner, Vernon B.Langeribock and Roy Seabrice Absent:None After announconent of the vote.,the Cbairrian requested the legal counsel to state th.e rule as to the status of a tie vote.hr.Nissori reported that in tN..~event of a tie vote,tbe motion TiJcjUld be lost. Mr.Nissan offered his rosi~nation as legal counsel for the Districts,to hecoaio effective October 31,l9~2, The Boards of D:Lrectors took the following action: Moved by Director Willis H.Warner,seconded by Director Vernon E.Langonbock: That tJ.ie resignation of Mr.C.Arthur Nissan,as legal counsel for the DistricUs,be accepted,effective as o1 October 31,l9~2. The vote was polled by roll call vote by Districts and the Secretary reported the notion lost by ti~~following vote: BOARD OF I)IRE(JTOHS DiSTRiCT NO,l ‘~yos°DJrLcUor Wilis H tamer ________-. Noes:Directors J.B.McBride and Mi:Lrord N.Dciii Absent:NOne BOARD OF i)I~h~CTORS DISTJ.UCT NO • 2 Ayes:Directors Robert H.Honey,Don N. La~ber, Nillis H.Warrior and wi:L:Licul H.I-brstein Noes:Directors Hugh W.Warden and Charles B.Stevens Absent:Director Frank J.Schweitzcr,Jr. -6— BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.3 P~-r!Qctor Willis H.WarnQr Noes:Directors Hugh 1~1.Warden,Nelson N. Launer,C.R.Miller and Joseph Webber Absent:None ~3OARD OIP DIRECTORS DISTRICT_NO.5 i~yos;t~iroctors Bradon Finch,Norman H. Miller and Willis H.Warner Noes:Nono Absent:None BOARD OF ~iRECTORS DISTRICT NO.6 Ayes:Directors C.H.Nelson,Bradon ________- Finch and Willis H.Warner Noes:None Absent:None BOARD 0 T DIRECTORS DISTRICT MO.7 Ayes:Director Willis H.Warner Noes:Directors Vincent L.Huneston and J.L.Mc3ride Absent:None BOARD CF DIRECTORS DISTRICT MO 8 Ayes:Director Willis H.Warner Noes:Dir~c ~or Harold L.Edwards Absent:Director John H.Cropper J3OARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.11 Ayes:Directors Willis H.Warner,Vernon B,Lanp~onbock and Roy Suabridi~e Noes:Mono Absent:None Clarification of ____ Director Warner led a discussion o~ previous action _____ the motion passed by the Boards on relative to tc~rm-October 3,1952,which would term ination of employees mate the Districts’employees as 3m October 31,1~52 of November 1,1952 and provided for vacation comriensurato with length of service.Director ‘lamer stated that the E~ecutive Committee had reviewed this notion and the effect it would have upon the completion of District Nos.1 and 6 lines,and offerod the sug~estion that the Districtsf employees be retained until tho arrival of Mr.Lee N.Nelson for his determination as to the termination date of the employees wnoso services would no longer be needed;and that the previous motion be rescinded and another passed by the Boards specifically settin~fo~’th a method for computing paid teininal vacations,recomriendin~that such a formula follow as nearly as possible the County’s policy of ~rantin~paid vacation to per diem employees,except that no terminal vacation be given unless th employee had worked for three months or longer in the service of the Districts. After a general discussion,the Boards of Directors took the fo1lowin,~action: 1~toved by Director J.L.McBride,seconded by Director Roy SoabridrTe and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,.~and 11: ‘-7— L That the following motion adopted by the Boards of Directors on October 8,1952: ~1That the present employees of the joint Districts be retained until November 1,1952 and that they be given vacatio~. commensurate with the length of employrient,based upon two weeks per year.” be and the same isheroby rescinded, Authorizing paid The.Boards of Directors took the terminal ~iacation~following,action: Moved by Director Hugh U,i~arden,seconded by Director Joseph hebbor and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11: That terminal vacations for oriploycos involuntarily icavin; the services of the Districts after October 31,1952 be calcu lated on the basis of one day’s paid vacation for each 20 days worked;that said terminal vacation pay be paid from the fund on funds that the employee’s salary has been charged to during the course of his employment in the saiie ratio of past payment, and that 21 working days per month ho used for coraputin~daily rates of pay. The Chair recognized fir.Kenneth Perry,employed by the Districts as Assistant Engineer.hr.Perry,requested the Districts’consideration of two weeks’advance notice for employees being involuntarily released from their employmon with the Disbnicts. The Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director P~oy Soabnidi;e,seconded by Director Vernc E.Lanc~onheck and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Kos,1,2,3,5,6,7,3 and 11: That two wooks’advance no bico be given each ermloyoo before severance of employment by the Districts. ~BUSINESS:~ 1.Reaffirmation of Director Boney requested the contract wi th Boards cons ideration of roaffir— Mealy Tibbitts milr;the contract with Mealy Company _______ Tibbitts cori~any for the con struction of the marine section of the ocean outfall to the full 7,000 feet;stating that tii~time limit for reaffirmation would expire on November 3,1952. After a general discussion,the Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No.231,determining the length of the ocean outfall sewer (marine section)and directing County Sanitation District No,1 to so eroceed with the construc tion,Certified copies of this Resolution is attached hereto and made a part of those minutes., -5— 2.Extension of time Chairman Finch reported tHat the 30-day for submIssion of extension of tine for submission of final_plans~~plans and specifications agreedupon by ~pecifications the Districts and the de~Lgn engineers would expire November 1,1952.The Boards of Directors took the fo1lowin~action; Moved by Director Willis H,Warner,seconded by D~roctor Robert H.Bonoy and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11: That the Boards of Directors hereby request the privi— logo of holding in abeyance work on the plans and speci fications for an additional 15 days from October 30,1952, the expiration date of work suspension requested by the Boards on October 1,1952 and granted by th~engineers on that date;and that the timo for completion of plans and specifications by the design engineers be extended 15 days, Mr.John A.Carollo,representing the design engineers, approved and agreed to the extension requested by the Boards. 3.~!2~~d Review Director VinOont L.Huraeston proposed, of estimates by as a method of expediting bhe business, a_consulting of the Districts and in the interest Ln~1necrIr1g S Lrm of positi ~determination that the bond funds available are insufficient to construct the joint facilities under the original bond pronosal plan that a consulting engineering firn be employed to review the estimates. The Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director Vincent L.Hurieston,seconded by Director Milford W.Dahi: That the County Sanitation~~atricts of Orange County employ a reputable engineering fin~i to review the current status of the bond engineer’s plan to determine whether or not the iroposod modification recommended by the Finance Committee will best serve the o~ods of the Districts in relation to the bond plan. The Chairman cal~Lod for discussion of the motion and Director Warner expressed the opinion that a notion for cmployiriont should state terms and conditions and author ization for payment of services rendered;and recommended that the motion include instructions for securing proposals from consulting engineering firms as the basis of payment. Director Warner offered a substitute motion for consider ation,and with the consent of the mover and the seconder the following motion was substituted for the original motion, and was duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 arid 11: That Directors Hurioston and Warden ho designated as a Committee of two and that they ho instructed to secure a definite proposal from some competent engineering firm for services they doom necessary in the review of the bond plan and the modification plan and thet the Committee so desig nated report back to the Boards at the earliest possible time, —9- A discussion was hold upon thcpo;sibility of calling for bids under the bond proposal plan.Mr.John A.Carollo reported that all plans and specifications under the bond proposal plan,exceptin~the treatment plant,wore now com~letc and available and that the treat-~ rient plant plans and specifications were 6O~complete,and suggested that the Boards consider cal:Ling for bids on the completed plans in order to dotemino the amount of funds then available for the treatment plant.Director Warner roquestod hr.Ribel’s opinion on the recommendation of Mr. Carollo.Mr.Ribal stated that he had always hold that bids should be called for and concurred in.this procedure to doterriin.o costs;but that he could sac nothing wrong with to ruVi~w as suggested by ~Huneston, The Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director 141111s H.Warner,seconded by Director Norman H.Miller and,duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitetion Districts Nos.1,2,3, ~,6,‘7 and 11: That the design engineers be requested to present plan.s and specifications for the :;Bushard Street Trunk and Treatment Plant Trunk Sewers to the Districts before the next meeting of the Boards,on October 29,l9~2. Mr.PLihal stated that ho had reviewed the plans and specifications on the Ellis Av~nue Trunk Sewer and recom mended correlation of certain items in the specifications; and,at the request of Director i..eibor,itemized the correlations which ho stated ho he of dimensional nature. Mr.Rihal road.hi~report and recoin riondations to the Directors.This report is on file ifl the office of the Secretary. The Boards of uircctor~took the following action upon the recommendations contained in the written report of the Chief Engineer and General Manager: 1.AuthorizngRa~yr~ond A notion was :~ado by Director Willis H. M.Hortel to s’~gn Warner,seconded by Director Roy Soabridge ce~tai~n paners’and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos,1,2, 3,~,6,7,i3 a:~d 11: That Raymond M.Hortol,e::~.ployed as Supervising Engincor by the joint County Sanitation Districts,be and ho is hereby authorized to coprovo t ir’ie cards,sign the payroll and warrant derian.de,sign.letters requesting the County nuc tor to transfer such funds as may be necessary for the paj~ient of obligations,oversee the work now under coylstrucG:Lori,certify progress pa~ients,prepare and sign engineer!a certificates and ~stiniatus during the tir~ic that Ra.?e2ond H,Hibal,Chief En~inoui’and General Manager is on vacat~an end until such time as Ier,Ribal’s successor arrives, ~..Availability of ~xd proposal — plans for u~o in calling for bids Report of ‘the Chief Engineer and +crioral Manager -10 — ~1~8 1 A motion was made by Dirictor Wii1i~ H.Warner,seconded by Director J.L. Mcbride and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2, 3,~,6,7,and 11: That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 hereby authorize Ra~ond N.Hortel,Suporvisinc ~ngineor,to fill the vacanc~’ created by the resignation of Carl S.Starnos,by employing Jack H.~•Joiner as engineering aide at the salary of ~3O3,O0 per month for the period October 27th to October 31,1952, inclus lye. The Chain~ian called upon Mr.Ribal ____ for a report upon the adequacy of tiic _________ staff of the Districts to perfor~thL preliminary engineering work when __________ cor~struction work is started on the _______ ocean outfall.Mr.Hihal reported thet the prosoub survey crow would b. enr~aged on the work now under cons true tion for Districts Nos.1 and 6,and that the.ee would ho a need for a survey crow for rrolininary work on the ocean outfall sewer. A motion was iiade by Director Willis H.Warner, soco:odod by Director C.H.Miller and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County San:itation Districts Nos,1, 2,3,5,6,‘7 and 11: That the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 hereby ask the design engi~:io~rs to perform the general supervision on constructio~. of the marine section of the ocean outfall sower,under the tunas of ti.ici r contract,and that they supervise the necessary preliminary un~ineuning work as a courbesy to the Districts;and that bhc design engineers,Harrison &Wool1e~y and Headman,Ferguson &Carello,be paid by the County Sanitation Districts for the field party required for this work whi 10 tim f Wiial c o at roe wL th triem is he irig worked out Dr.Harrison,roprosentet.ng bbe design engineers,stated that they were i’iilling to grant the request of the Dis brie bs for the performance of sorv:Lc Os ruqiirui. ~~~irn~ient The Boards of ~irec bors took the fol:Looina action: keyed by Director Roy Soahridg;,seconded by Director Charles H.Stevens and duly carried: That this meeting be adjourned to the hour of 8:00 on October 29,1952 in Hoer.239 at llOLj.West Dighth Gtre~t,~anba Aria,California. 1:Jhoreupon,the Chainaan declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:20 p 2.Authorizing emp1o~iont of Jack H. Authorizing harrison ~ot a1 - to supervise the pro 1 inlinary wo rk ~T~TFie T~ii~bYF~tT s owe r —11 — ~82 h~..~n,~oa d of Directors - /Coun j Sanitation District No.3 Orai cr,o County,California ATTEST: S~crotar~r,~oa~a of Dire tors County Sanitation District No.3 o rori~~e County,Cal irornia -12 — RESOLUTION NO.231_3 RESOLUTION OF TUE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.OF CCTJNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO 3 OF ORANGE cOUNTY, CALIFORNIA,DETERMINING TUE LENGTH OF THE OCEAN - OUTFALL SEWER (MARINE SECTION)AND DIRECTING COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICI1 NO.1 OF ORANGE COUNTY TO SO PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION. WHE~EA3:County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 of Oran~e County,California by Resolution 206 dated August 6,1952,directed said District No.1 to award a contract to Mealy Tibbitts Construction Company t~or the construction.of the Ocean Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)and WHEREAS:said award of contract was made on the condition tha the length of the outfall be confirmed within sixty (60)days from the date of the contract,and WHEREAS:said sixty (60)day period will expire on November 3 1952,now therefore,be it RESOLVED:that County Sanitation District No.3 of Orange County,California does hereby find and determine that the Ocean Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)be constructed to Station 70 /00 a~ shown on the plans arid specifications therefor adopted by Resolutic No.17L~-3 of the Board of Directors of last said District. FURTHER RESOLVED:that County Sanitation District No.1 of Orange County,California acting as Contracting Agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Has.2,3,5,6,7 and 11 be and is hereby directed to reaffirm the provision of the contract with the Mealy Tlbb:Ltts Construction Company;that the Ocean Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)be constructed to Station 70 /00 as hereinabove referred to. The foregoing Resolution ~ias passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.3 on the 22nd day of October,1952 ~ ~ecreatry,Board ol TY.rectors County Sanitation Disbrict No.3 Orange County,California -1- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I,ORA MAE MERRITT,Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No,3 of Orange County~California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.3 of Orange County,California,held on the 22nd day of October ,1952 by the following roll c311 v(~te: AYES:Directors Hugh W.Warden,Nelson M.Launer,Joseph Webber,C.R.Miller and Willis H.Warner NOES:None ABSENT:None IN ~pjrjl~33 WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of County Sanitation District No.3 of Orange County,California. this 22nd day of October ,1952. Secretary,Board of Direc’toi~s County Sanitation District No.3 Orange County,California —2.-