Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDistrict 02 Minutes 1952-10-22-I.& MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ~iO.2 ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA October 22,1952 at L~:OO p.m. Room 239,11OL~.West Eighth Street Santa Ana,California The Board.of Directors met in regular session at ti_ic hour of 3:00 p.m.,October 22,1952 in Roori 239 at 110L~West Eighbh Street, Santa Ana,California. Chainnan Finch called ~he joint n.eeting of the Districts1 Boards to order at 8:00 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board to be jjresent. Directors present:Robert H.Boney (Chairman),Hugh W.Warden,Don B.1-laiber,Charles E.Stevens,Willis H.Warner and William H.Hirstein Directors absent:Frank J.Schweitzer,Jr. Others Present:Rayraond F.Ribal,Chief Engineer and General Manage~ C.Arthur ~isson,Jr. Ilarry Ashton John A•Carollo J.A.~‘ool1ey ic.J.i-iarrison Raymond ..~erte1 ~JaJJ;er RaFlsey ~cenneth j~er~ 1~Jaiter Chaff ee Ora Mae herritt,Secretary Approval of The Boards of Dtrectors of County Sani Minutes -~ tation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,7 and 11 took the following action: Moved by Director Willis II.Warner,seconded by Director Williar~N.Hirstein and duly carried: That the minutes of the nisetinls held on October 1 and O~tober 6,1952 be approved as Flailed out. -1— ‘~i~7’~4~ ____ The Boards of Directors of CoUnt~t ____ Sanitation Districts Nos,~1,2,3,5,6~ ______ 7 an~1].took the following action: D.oved by Director Hugh W.~arden,seconded by J)irector William H.}-Iirstein a~d duly carried; That the Joint Administrative ~iarrant Register be approve for signature and payment of: Warrant Demand No,In Favor Of ___ Davis Stationers 1.68 Dennis Printers 15.31 Aleen-Line Corporation 3.52 5tandard Oil Compan~T of Ca1ifor~ia 32.75 F.R.Harwood,Postmaster 30.00 ~~83,2 Correspondence, Connuni cat :~.o us andT~ep6~s fL~od 1.O~uar;o:dy nudib The Secretery reported receipt of certi fied quarterly audit report from the firm of Diehl and Company,and read balances of each Districts I funds. A notion was made by Director ~i11is H.Trfarner seconded by Director Vernon E.Langenbeck and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2, 3,5,6,7,8 and 11: That ti-ie audit report for the quarter ending September 30,1952,received from Diehi anc.Ooripany be received and ordered filed, 2.Vacation roqnost The Secretory read a let~er from Mary f~.Gillisnia,stenographer in the offic of the Joint Acimir~istretive or~anizabion requesting paid vac at ion, The Boards of Directors took the following action: hoved by Director Nelson N.Launer,seconded by Director Vincent L.Humeston and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11: T~eat hary B.Gi1lisp~e eranloyed by the Districts as Senior Stenographer—Clerk in the Joint Adr~inistrative Organization,be and she is hereby authorized to take a vacation with pay beginning November 10,1952 to and.in cluding November 21,1952. Report of the Director Robert H.Boney,Chairman cro ~cutive Committee ten of the Bxocutive Connittee reported upon the meeting hold on October 17, 1952,as follows: Joint_Adminis~ tra t i v~’anl~ ) JA-L~O3 L1oL~. L~o5 L~O6 J4~O 7 Amount -2-. 1.Relative to the Boards’request for recommendation upon filling the vacancy created by th~resignation of the Chief Er~gineor and General Manager,the Copimittee reviewed the rian~factors facing the Districts in establishing sound administration and o~g~ization of ~1-~e joint Districts’ program.Art~r ~Qn d~z~atjQn of qual~4~ications of men who had applied for the position,the Committee unanimously recommended the eriployment of hr.Lee N.Nelson as Chief Engineer and General Manager upon a trial basis at the monthly salary of ~l,OOO.OO ~cr month,and that regular employment and amount of salary be detem~iined by mutual agreement between the Districts and ivir.Ne’son within a period not to exceed six months.I’•ir.Boney reported the Committee had been advised by ~Nelson that if the Districts desired his services,ho could report for duty about Nove:ribor 1st, Director F~oney stated that Mr,Nelson had previously been interviewed by a three man Committee comprised of Director Warner,Director Warden and :~oi~ier Director Reed.Director. Warner was called upon for further information as to the background of Mr.Nelson. Director Warner reported that at the time Mr.Nelson appeared before the Committee he was employed by the City of Rochester,Minnesota as Chief of the Utilities Commission. that ha is a registered civil and electrical engineer and has now gone into private consulting work.Director Warner stated that Mr.Nelson enjoys a wide reputation as a very able n~an,even teripered and with the ability to work with and got along with people in very complex situations;that his qualifications would well fit h~ri for the position now open c~fnore there will be a volu~~o of administrative work the Manager will be called upon to carry out. 2.Chairman Boney reported that the Committee had held over the business of making a recorv~~endation on the requested annexation bo County Sanitation District No.3,until all information would be available and a report received from the J.C.S. Employment of The Boards of Directors took the Chief E~gineor following action: and Genexal Man~ager Moved by Director J.L.McBride, seconded by Director Don B.Haiber and duly carried by the Doards of Directors of County Sani tation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11: That tIie report of the Executive Committee be anproved and accepted;and that Mr.Leo M.Nelson be and he is hereby employed as Chief Enginee±~and General Manager for County Sanitation Districts i”os.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11 uijon a trial basis ~at the monthly salary of ~l,OOO.OO per month,effective November 1,1952;and that regular employ ment and amount of salary be determined by mutual agreement between the Districts and Mr.yelson within a period not to exceed six months. Director C.M.Nelson,Chaimnan of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.6 stated that inasmuch as Mr.Lee N.Nelson is his cousin,ho believed it to he only ethical to sever his connections with the Districts and that he would resign as a member of the Board of his District, -3- Report of the Director warner,Chai~rrian of •th~ Finance Committee Finance Committee reported that - the Committee had~been working upon the agreement with the engineers;but,,since thelo~st meeting,business affairs of members of the Cor~iittee had made it impossible to hold very many meetings together for the purpose of studying dQt~ls of the contracb,and as they felt this should be given very careful consideration and a draft of the contract prepared and nailed to the Directors ahead of the joint meeting of the Boards,the Committee recommended that their~report be hold ovo~r and made a special matter of business at the regular nesting of the Boards on Novexiber 12,1952;that previous to this meeting,the Corriittee could have the contract prepared in detail and sent to the Directors The ~oards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director Nelson N.Launer,seconded.by Director Norman H.Miller and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos,1,2,3,5,6,7 and ll~ That the report of the Finance Committee be approved and accepted. _____ Director Boney requested that the _____ officiol action of the Executive _________ Committee relative to eriploymcnt _________ of lee~al counsel for the Districts be read from the minutes of the meeting of the Executive Committee;and that bhe resolution authorizing employment of Mr.Nisson be read. At th.o request of the Chairman,the Secretary road the following excerpt from the minutes of t;he meeting of the Executive Committee held on October 3,1952: Diroctors present:Robert N.Boney (Chairman) Thomas J.FJadington,alternate ~or Hr.Bligh 1.harden 5.L.McBride,alternate for hr.Courtney H.Chandler Braden Finch C.N.Nelson Vincent L.Hurieston Others present:Raymond R,Ribal B.5.Marks K.5,Harrison Ora Mae Merritt,Secretary After a full discussion upon the enployment of an attorney for the Districts,a notion was made,duly seconded and carried,that recommendation be made to the Districts’Boards that C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.be employed as the attorney for the Districts at tho rate of ~355.OO per month,providing Mr.Nisson “ten~’iinates his employment as the City Attorney for Tustin.~’ The Secretary read Resolution No.93,authorIzing ei~ploy— mont of C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.as legal counsel for the Joint Admin istrative organization of the eight County Sanitation Districts, adopted by tb.c Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts, Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11 on October 10,1951.This rosolutioi was carried in full In the condensed minutes of the meeting of October 10,1951 which were approved by the Boards on October 2~, 1951. Business hold over: re:clarification of tex~is of employ— r~cnt of legal counsel —L~.— fl? The Chainnan ca3led upon Ni”,Nisson a report upon the terms of his enployment.Mr.Nisson reported that ho had no knowledge of the Executive Corni,ttee minutes and that he had no,~ been asked by anyone to agree to tenus of eriploynent other ,tben those contained in Rosolutjon No.98;that if ithe Boards desired his enploynent to be base4 upon the terms contained in the Exocu tive Conuittoe minaea,I~e imu],4 then report his decision. There followed a full discussiqn by,the Directors as to whether or not there night be a conflict in services perforncd by tho legal counsel in sorvin~a city and the Districts. The Boards of Øirootors took the followiné action: ~iovod by Director Milford W.Dab].,soconded by Director’ Hugh W.tJardon: That Mr.Nisson’s onploynent as Legal Counsel for the Districts be continued in accordance with Resolution No.98,adopto by the Boards of Directors of County Saaitation Districts Nos.1,2~ 3,5,6,7,8 and 11 on October 10,1952. Director Boney spoke to the notion,stating that at the time tho Cornitteo recorinended Mr.Kisson’s enploynont,navies of other attorneys presented to the Connittoe wore elininated from consideration because they were attorneys for cities within the Districts;and that Mr.Nisson’s nane was considered only because they wore informed ho would resign as the attorney toy the City of Tustin if appointed legal counsel for the Districts. Director Lan~enbeck stated that ho bad been aware of the fact that Mr.flsson had not resigned as attorney for Tustin,but realized that it is difficult for a city to appoint an attorney. upon short notice and that he ‘had not raisod the question as to tho terns of Mr.Nisson’s oviploynent until the city had bad sufficient tine to appoint a successor to Mr.Nisson. Mr.Nisson stated that if tjao najority of the Boards desired that he make a decision to continue his employment in accordance with the reconnendations contained in the minutes of the Executive ~o~riittee~s meeting,he would offer his resignation as legal counsel to the Districts,effective as of Octobur 3l~1952. The Chairman called for roll call vote upon the motion: The vote was polled by roll call voto by Districts and the Secretary reported the notion lost by the following vote: BOARD OF DI1tiCTORS DISTRICT NO.1 — Ayes:Directors Milford N.Dahl,and J.L. McBride Noes:Diroctor Wills H.Warner Absent:None BOARD OF DIRs3CWRS DISTRICT ?!O 2 - Ayes:Directors Hugh N.Warden and Charles E.Stevens Noes:Directors Robert H.Boney,Don B. Haiber,Willis H.Warner and William N.Birstein Absent:Diructer Frank J.Schweitzer,Jr. -5.. BOARD OF DIR~CTORS DISTRICT NO 3 ayes;D~o~tors Hugh W.Ward~n,Nelson N.Launcr,C.H.Miller and Joseph Mob be r Noes:Director Willis H.Warner Absent:Mono BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT No.~AyQ~:None V Noes:Directors Bradon Finch,Norman •H.Miller and Willis H.Warner Absent:Mono BOARD ~F DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.6 Ayes:None -- Noes:Directors C.N.Nelson,Willis i-i. Warner and Norman H.Miller Absent:Mono BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT hO.~ V V Ayes:Directors Vincent L.Humeston and J.L.McBride Noes:Director Willis H.~arncr Absent:None BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT NC..B Ayes:Director Hanld E.Edwards Noes:Director Willis H.Warner Absent:Director John R.Cropper BOARD OF DIRE(TORS DISTRICT_NO.11 Ayes:None Noes:Dirocto~s Willis H.Warner, Vernon H.Langenbeck and Roy S eabridge Absent:Mono Alter announcement of the vote,the Chairman requested the legal counsel to stato ~he rule as to tho status of a tie vote,hr.Nisson reported thaG in the event of a tie vote,the notion would he lost. Mr.Nisson offered his rosiRnation as legal counsel for the Districts,to become offoct~vo October 31,l9~2, The Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director Willis H.Warner,seconded.b:~Director Vernon E.Langonbock: That the resignation of Mr.C.Arthur Nissan,as legal counsel for the Districts,be accepted,effective as of October 31,l9~2. The vote was polled b~roil call vote by Districts and the Secretary reported the notion lost by the following vote: POARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.1 Ayes:Director Willis H.Warner _____-V -V• Noes:Directors J.L.McBride and Nil Co rd F •Dab.1 Absent:Mono BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO • 2 Ayes:Directors Robert H.l3onoy,Don N. Uaibcr,Willis H.~Iarrier and Willi~u~H • Hi rs te~in Noes:Directors ~1 •Warden and Charles H.Stevens Absent:Director Frank J.Schweitzcr,Jr. -6- ___ Aye~~irQctpr Willis H.Warner Noes:Directors Hugh W.Warden,Nelson MV Banner,C.H.Miller and Joseph Web her Absent:None _________ Ayes:~irectors Bradon Finch,Norman H. Miller and Willis H.Warner Noes:Nonc Absent:None BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.8 Ayes:Directors 1’Jillis H.Warner,Vernon B.Langonbock and Roy Soabridgo Noes:None Absent:Mono __________ Director Warner led a discussion o~ ____ the notion passed by the Boards on October 3,l9~2,which would terre— ___ mate UhL)Districtst employees as ______ of.iovcribor 1,l9~2 and provided for vacation cor~iensurate with ~Jarnor stated that the Eiecutive notion and the effect it would have upon the completion of District Mos.I and 6 lines,and offered the suggestion that the Districts’em loyces be retained until the arrival of Mr.Leo N.Nelson for his determination as to the bcrmination date of the employees whose services would no longer be needed;and that the previous notion be rescinded and another passed U bho Boards specifically setting forth a method for computing paid terminal vacations,rocoririendin~that such a formula follow as nearly as ~the County’s policy of granti~-ig paid vacation to per dieri onployoos,except that no terminal vacation be given unloss the employee had worked for three months or longer in the service of the Districts. After a general discussion,the Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director J.L.McBride,seconded by Director Roy Seabridge and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of Connty Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11: BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISTRICT_NO.3 I3OARD OF DIRICTORS DISTRICT NO ~ BOARD OF eIRECTORS DISTRiCT NO.6 BOARD 0 :~DIEROTORS DISTRICT NO.7 Ayes:Directors C.N.Nelson,Bradon Finch and Willis H.~iarnor Noes:None Absent:bone Ayes:Director Willis H.Warner Noes:Diroctor~i Vincent L.Hunoston and J.B.McPride Absent:None Ayes: i\TOCS: Absent: Di.rector Willis H.Warner Di inc to r Harold L . Edwards Director John 11.Cropper BOARD OF DIRECTONS DISTRICT NO.11 Clarification of ____ p~ovious action _____ relative to tc;n~i mat_ion of erep:Loyo ~s onö~tohor 31,l9.~2 length of service.Director Committee had reviewed this —7— That the following motion adopted by the Boards of Directors on October ~,i9~2: “That the present employees of the joint Districts be retained until November 1,1952 and that they be given vacatio~ commensurate with the length of o:aployrient,based upon two weeks ~or year.” be and the same is hereby rescinded, Aut!~oriz~ng paid Th.Bo~cas of Drcctor~took the terminal vacations followiig action: Moved by Director Pugh N.harden,seconded by Director Joseph 1iebbor and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation I)istricts hos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11: That tominal vacations for employees involuntarily leavinr the services of the Districts after October 31,1952 be calcu lated on tLio basis of one aay’s po.:Lc{vacation for each 20 aays worked;that said tominal vacation pay be paid from the fund or funds that the on~ioyoe’s salary has boon charged to during the course of his employment in the sane ratio of past payr~iont, arid that 21 ~Torking days per month to used for computing daily rates of pay. The Chair recognized Hr.Kenneth.Perry,employed by the Districts as Assistant Engineer.Hr.Perry,requested the Districts I consideration of~’~~~e weeks advance notice for employees being involuntarily released from their employrnun with the Districts. The Boards of Directors toek the following action: Moved by Director F~oy Scabridit:;,seconded by Director Vernon E.Lan~~cnhock and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County SEuclitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7,8 and 11: That two ~eoks’advance no ~ico ho given each employee before severance of orrploynon.t by the Districts. ?BUSIP~SS 1.Reaffirmation of Director Bonoy requested the contract with Boards~consideration of roaffir— Mealy Tlhbitts ri~.ng the contract with hoaly Company _______ Tibbitts corieany for the con struction of the marine section of the ocean outfall to the full 7,000 feet;stating that the ti~c limit for roaffirTlation would expire on November 3,1952. After a general discussion,the Boards of Directors adopted Resolution No.2.31,determining the length of the ocean outfall sewer (marine section)and directing County Sanitation District No.1 to so eroceed with the construc tion,Certified copies of this Resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, —8— -i~ai~ ___________ Chairman Finch reported ~at the 30-day ____ extension of time for submission of _____ p1an~and specificati~n.s a~reed upon by __________________ the Districts and the design engineers would expire No~riber~l,1952.,The Boards of Directors took the .Collowiri,g?action: Moved by Director Willis H,Warner,seconded by Director Robert H.Bonoy and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11: That the Boards of Directors horeby.requtst the privi lege of holding in abeyance work on the plans and speci fications for an additional 15 days from October 30,1952, the expiration date of work suspension requested by the Boards on October 1,1952 and granted.by theengineers on that date;and that the time for completion of plans and specifications by the design en~ineers be extended 15 days. Mr.John A.Carollo,representing the design engineers, approved and agreed.to tI~ie extension requested by the Boards. Director Vincent L.Humeston proposed, as a method of expediting the business, _____ of the Districts and in the interest _______ of positivL.determination that the bond funds available arc insufficient to construct the joint facilities under the original bond propossl plan that a consulting en~inecring .fim~i be employed to review the estimates The Boards of Dire~tors took the following action: ivioved by Director Vincent L.i-~urieston.,seconded by Director Milford W.Dahi: That the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County employ a reputahLo ogineering fi:rm to review the current status of bl-i~bond engineer’s Plan to determine whether or not the proposed i’iedification recomirusnded by the Finance Committee will best serv~the ~eods of the Districts in relation to the bond plan. The Chairman called for discussion of the motion and Director Warner expressed tile opinion that a notion for oripio~anent should state terms arid conditions and author ization for payment of services rendered;and recommended that the notion include instructions for securing proposals from consulting engineering finas as the basis of payment. Director Warner offered a substetute motion for consider— at:Lon,and with the consent of tho mover and the seconder the following notion was subs t:Lbutcd for the o.~igina1 motion, and was duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Hoe.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11: That Directors Humoston and Warden he designated as a Corn ittoc of two and that they be instructed ~o secure a dofinita proposal from some competent engineering firm for services they deem necessary in the review of the bond plan arid the modification plan and that the Committee so desig nated report back to the Boards at the earliest possible time. 2.Extension of time for_su~iission.of final I~ns~ sp cc i.i c~~ion~ 3.Pr~p~sedRcy:Le3 of esti3yiatos by a_consi.lting engineering firm ‘.9 — Th2 Li..Availability of A discussion was hold upon the popsibility bond proposal of calling for bids under the bond proposal lans for use in plan.Mr.John A.Carollo reported that all c~thngiorT~ds plans ana spcci~’ications und~r the conci proposal plan,excepting the treatment plant,were ~-iow complete and evailablo and that the treat ment plant plans and specifications were 6O~complete,and sug~ostc;d that the Boards consider calling for bids on the completed plans in order to dotommno the amount of funds then available for the troatnont plant.Director warner requested Mr.Ribalts opinion on the recommendation of Mr. Carollo.Mr.Ribal stated that ho had always hold that bids should be called for and concurred in this procedure to determine costs;hut that he could see nothing wrong with the review as suggested by hr.Nuaieston. The Boards of Directors took the following action: Moved by Director ~Iillis H.~iarrLor,seconded by Director Norman H.I’Jillor and.duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3, ~,6,7 and 11: That the design engineers be requested to proson.t plan.s and spocifications for the J3ushard Street Trunk and Treatment Plant Trunk Sewers to the Districts before th.o next meeting of the Boards,on October 29,l9~2. Hr.Ribal stated that ho had reviewed the plans and specifications on the Ellis Av~.~nue Trunk Sewer and recori— mended correlation of certain items in the specifications; and,at the request of Director Haiber,itemized the correlations which he stated to he of dimensional nature. Report of the Chief Mr.Rihal road.his report and recom— E~ngi~cr ~Id~c~~I riondations to the Directors.This report Manager - is on file in the office of the Secretary. The Boards of Directors took the following action upon the recommendations contained in the written report of the Chief ~ng:Lncer and General Manager: 1.Authorizin Raymond A motion was ~acde by Director 1:Jillis H. ti to si~n T~iarner,seconded by Director Roy Soabridgo certain papers and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Senitation Districts Nos.1,2, 3 c-~7 ‘-7 () ,a,°,(30 ana 11:. That Raymond N.Hortel,ea’~ployod as Supervising Engineer by the joint County Sanitation Districts,be and he is hereby authorized to aonrovo tine curde,sign the payroll and warrant deriands,sig-n letters rcqieusting the County Auditor to transfer such.funds as nay be necessary for the pa,jment of obligations,oversee the work now under construction,certify progress pa~ients,prepare and sign engineert s certificates and ~s biriates during the tin.e that Ra~Tnonc1.h.Jhbal,Chief Hngin~.ur and General Managor is on vacat~en and until such time as Mr.Ribal’s successor arrives -10 — A motion was made by Dirictor Willis H.Warner,seconded by Director J.L. McBride and duly carried by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos,1,2, 3,!,6,7,end 11: That the Boards of Directors bf County Sanitation Districts Nos.1,2,3,~,6,7 and.11 hereby authorize Ra~paond N.Bortul,Supcrvi siri~Bngineer,to fill tho vacanc; created by the resignation,of Carl S.Starnos,by cmpioying Jack R •~ioirncr as on ..nering aide at the salary of ~‘..3O3.OO por nonth for the period October 27th to October 31,l9~2, inclusive, The Chaj.rman called upon Mr.Ribal ____ for a report unon the adequacy of th. ____ staff of the Districts to perform thc prelininary engineering work when __________ construction work is sterbed on the _______ ocean outfall.Mr.Rihal reported thot tho present survey crew would bu enr~agcd on the work now under construction for Disl;ricts Nos.1 and 6,and that tI’.iore would ho a need for a survey crew for preliminary work on bho ocean outfall sower. A notion was nade by Director Willis I-I.Warner, SOcOPdod by Director C.H.Miller and duly carried by the Boards of ~Dircctors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.1, 2,3,~,6,7 and ii: That the Boards of Dircctc~rs of County Sanitation Districts Nos.:L,2,3,~,6,7 and 11 hereby ask th.o desii.~r’ onyi~:]o.~rs to perform the guno:oal supervision on constructio: of the marine section ol’the ocean outfall sower,under the terf~is of their’contract,and that they supervise the rioccssaryproiin.triary engineering work as a courbosy to.the Districts;cud that.the design engineers,Harrison &Woolley and Headman,Fcrgu son ~Carollo,ho paid by the County Sanitation Districts for the fiu,ld party required for this work i~thilo the I’:Lncii controet wi.th thorn is being worked out. hr.Ho.rri;~on,representing the design engineers,stated that they wore ~~~i1:Leng to grant teLL.J.’~qlLOsL of thu Districts for the purfo e~.ncuu:f services req~J.r.~d. ~~u~’nnent The Boards of .e~irecbors took the foi1oïin:~ac t~on: hovod by Director Roy Soabridge,seconded by Director Charles B.htL.vans arid duly carried: That this meeting he adjourned to the hour’of 8:00 p.i:!.,on October’29,19~2 in Room 239 at 11OL~West ~ighth ~trou b,Santa Ana,California, ~hcrL.upon,the Che±~iar declared th~meeting so adjourned at 10:20 ~em. 2,Autho ri z inp;cn:p lo~riunt of Jack B.~o±nor Authorizing Harrison ~~Tt -- to supurvis~tue lininarj viork on the 0 C eCfl oi~f~J1 sower —11 — 1~) ,airman,/Board ol Directo County Sanitation District No!.3—~ Oran~c County,California ATTEST S~crotar~j,T-~oard of Directors County Sani~tation District No.2 Oran~c County,California —12 -. RESOLUTION NO..231 —2 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OCUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,DETERMINING THE LENGTH OF THE OCEAN, OUTFALL SEWER (MARINE SECTION)AND DIRECTING COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICI~NO.1 OF ORANGE COUNTY TO SC PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRTJCTION. WHEdEA3:County Sanitation Districts No~.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 of Orange County,California by Resolution 206 dated August 6,1952,directed said District No.1 to award a contract to Healy Tibbitts Construction Company ~or the construction of the Ocean Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)and WHEi-~EAS:said award of contract was made on the condition tha the length of the outfall be confirmed within sixty (60)days from the date of the contract,and WHEREAS:said sixty (60)day period will expire on November 3 1952,now therefore,be it RESOLVED:that County Sanitation District No.2 of Orange County,California does hereby find and determine that the Ocean Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)be constructed to Station 70 ,“00 a~ shown on the plans and specifIcation.s therefor adopted by Resolutlo No.l7L~.-2 of the Board of Directors of last said District, FURTHER RESOLVED:that County Sanitation District No.1 of Orange County,California acting as Contracting Agent for itself and CountySanitation Districts Nos,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 be and.i~ hereby directed to reaffirm the provision of the contract with the Healy Tibbitts Construction Company;that the Ocean Outfall Sewer (Marine Section)be constructed to Station 70 ~00 as hereinabove referred •bo. The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of th.e Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.2 on the 22nd day of October,1952 ~ Secreatry,Board 01 Direct~ors County Sanitation District No.2 Orange County,California -l - I STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ss COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I,ORA MAE MERRITT,Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.2;of Orange County,California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.2 of Orange County,California,held on the 22nd day of October ,1952 by the following roil.~a11 y~te: AYES:Directors Robert H.Boney,Hugh W.Warden,Don Bit. Haiber,Charles E.Stevens,Willis H.Warner and William H.Hirstein NOES:None ABSENT:Director Frank J.Schweitzer,Jr. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of County Sanitation District No.2 of Orange County,California! this 22nd day of October ,1952. ~~ Secretary,board of Directors County Sanitation District No~2 Orange County,California —2—