HomeMy WebLinkAboutDistrict 06 Minutes 1950-10-04LO~
MINUTES OF MEETING OF
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6
ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA
October 4,1950 at 7:30 P.M.
Conference Room
County Sanitation Districts’Office
Room 212,1104West Eighth Street
Santa Ana,California
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.6
pursuant to adjournment of the meeting on September 27,1950,
met in the County Sanitation Districts’Offices,11O4West
Eighth Street at the hour of 7:30 P.M.,on October 4,1950.
•The meeting was called to order by Chairman Nelson at 7:35
P.M.
There were present:Directors C.M.Nelson(Chairman)
and Braden Finch.
Absent:Director Irvin G.Gordon.
Others present:Nelson M.Launer,Administrative
Officer
Nat H.Neff,Engineer
E.J.Marks,Attorney
C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.,Attorney
Harry Ashton,Attorney
Ora Mae Merritt,Secretary
RESOLUTION NO.49 The Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No.6 adopted
the following Resolution No.49:
RESOLUTION OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6
FIXING AND DETERMINING COMPENSATION AND EXPENSES
TO BE PAID LEGAL COUNSEL IN CONNECTION WITH LITI
GATION TO DETERMINE THE VALIDITY OF A LIMITED
PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT UNDER WHICH CERTAIN DIS
TRICTS VOTED BONDS FOR THE PROCUREMENT AND CON
STRUCTION OF SEWERAGE FACILITIES.
WHEREAS,the matter of interpreting the limited partici
pation agreement under which County Sanitation Districts Nos.
2,3 and 7 have agreed to participate in a countywide sewerage
development plan has arisen;and
WHEREAS,the attorneys representing the proposed bond
buyers deem that it is necessary to bring court proceeding to
fix and determine the exact interpretation of the aforesaid
limited participation agreements;and
-1-
133
WHEREAS,attorneys E.J.Marks and Adrian Marks are the attorneys
representing the Joint Administrative Organization and County Sanitation
Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11;and
WHEREAS,attorney C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.,is the attorney specially
representing County Sanitation District No.7;and
WHEREAS,the aforesaid attorneys are preparing to being a proceeding in
the District Court of Appeal for the purpose of determining the validity and
interpretation of the aforesaid limited participation agreements and for any
other necessary prupose;and
WHEREAS,it is necessary that the law firm of O’Melveny &Myers and
James L.Beebe be employed as counsel therein and be paid the reasonable
value of their services therein which will not be less than ~l,OOO or more
than 4~l,5OO.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED:
That~the fees of each of said attorneys,excepting O’Melveny &Myers and
James L.Beebe,be fixed at the sum of 4~l5O.OO per day for one day,or any
part of a day,each attorney is in Court for the hearingof the proposed
litigation,the principal purpose of which is to determine the validity and
interpretation of the limited participation agreements involving Districts
Nos.2,3 and 7,or any one of them;and the attorneys’fees of O’Melveny
&Myers and James L.Beebe’be fixed at the above mentioned figure for their
services.
1.That attorneys E.J.Marks and Adrian Marks and C.Arthur Nisson,Jr.
are authorized to bring a court proceeding in the name of County Sanitation
Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11 of Orange County,California,for the
~purpose of securing an interpretation and exact meaning of that certain
limited participation agreement under which County Sanitation Districts Nos.
2,3,and 7 have agreed to participate in a countywide sewerage development
plan,and for any other necessary purposes.
2.That the fees of each of said attorneys,excepting O’Melveny &Myers
and James L.Beebe,be fixed at the sum of ~l5O.OO per day for one day,or
any part of a day,each attorney is in Court for the hearing of the proposed
litigation,the principal purpose of which is to determine the validity and
interpretation of the limited participation agreement involving Districts
Nos.2,3 and 7,or any one of them;and the attorneys’fees of O’Melveny
&Myers and James L.Beebe be fixed at the above mentioned figure for their
services.
3.That attorney fees for preparation of pleadings and for the hearing
shall be paid at the hourly rates heretofore authorized for the respective
attorneys;this shall not include the compensation for O’Melveny &Myers
and James L.Beebe.
4.That the actual cost of lodging for said attorneys occasioned by
their appearance at the District Court of Appeal for the hereinabove speci
fied purpose shall be authorized to be paid in a sum not to exceed ~5.OO
per day.
5.That mileage be authorized at the usual rate in connection with
~subject litigation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the costs and expenses in connection with
the above mentioned litigation be paid out of the Joint Administrative Fund
of Districts Nos.1,2,3,5,6,7 and 11.
—2—
13 ~
The foregoing Resolution was introduced by Director
Finch who moved its adoption.This motion was seconded
by Director Nelson and was carried by the following vote:
AYES:Directors Braden Finch and C.M.Nelson.
NOES:None,
ABSENT:Director Irvin G.Gordon
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
86.
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I,ORA MAE MERRITT,Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No.6 of Orange County,Cdlifornia,
hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution was duly
and regularly adopted by the said Board at a meeting thereof held
on the 4th day of October,1950.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand this
9th day of October,1950.
~2/~~~~
Secretary of the Bo~rd of ~birect~rs
of County Sanitation District No.
6 of Orange County,California.
Mr.E.J.Marks led a general discussion on the proposed
revised pages Nos.10,11,16,17 and 19 of the Use and Ultimate
Purchase Agreement.
Mr.Nisson and Mr.Ashton reported on the meeting of the
Attorneys of the four cities and sanitary districts,which was
held on October 3,1950 in the Conference Room of the County
Sanitation Districts’Office.
Mr.Marks expressed the opinion that the main issues in
the proposed revised pages Nos,10,11,16,17 and 19 of the
Use and Ultimate Purchase Agreement appear to be the date of
possession,control and operation.He stated that matters of
policy should be determined by the Directors of the Districts
and that the attorneys could then prepare necessary documents.
Mr.Nisson and Mr.Ashton concurred in this opinion.
—3—
Mr.Marks stated that the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No.1,by minute order of October 2,1950,
had expressed the desire to call a meeting of the members of
the Executive Committee to discuss the clarification of the
wording of the Use and Ultimate Purchase Agreement.
Director Nelson expressed the opinion that County Sanitation
District No.6 Board should defer action on the resolution
approving the Use and Ultimate Purchase Agreement until a meeting
of the Executive Committee had been held.
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.6
took no action on the proposed revisions of pages Nos.10,11,
16,17 and 19 of the Use and Ultimate Purchase Agreement.
Mr.Nelson M.Launer used a large wall map in explaining
the location of existing facilities and proposed new facilities
in a general discussion on the County-wide sewerage program.
A motion was made by Director Finch,duly seconded and
carried that this meeting be declardd adjourned at 9:10 P.M1
B oard of U irect or s
County Sanitation District No.6
Orange County,California
ATTEST:
Ora Mae Merri~7 Temporary’Se~retary
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No.6
Orange County,California
-4-.