Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-02-28 a `oJ� SAXrr�7j0y°w ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ,F February 21, 2007 phone: 1714)962-2411 NOTICE OF MEETING fax: (714)962-0356 www,ocs d.com mailing address: BOARD OF DIRECTORS P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 92728-8127 street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA WEDNESDAY, February 28, 2007 — 7:00 P.M. 92708-7018 Member Agencies DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Cities Fountain Valley, California 92708 Anaheim Brea Buena Park Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Garden Grove Huntington Beach District will be held at the above location, time and date. Irvine Le Habra La Palma Los Alamitos / /1 Newport Beach Orange Placentia Clerk of the,,Board Santa Ana Seal Beach Stanton Tustin Villa Park Yorba Linda GWRS Steering Committee - Monday, February 26, 2007 at 5:30 p.m. @ OCWD County of Orange Operations Committee - Wednesday, March 7, 2007 at 5:00 p.m. Sanitary Districts Administration Committee - Wednesday, March 14, 2007 at 5:00 p.m. Costa Mesa Midway City Steering Committee - Wednesday, March 28, 2007 at 5:00 p.m. Water Districts Irvine Ranch To maintain world-class leadership in wastewater and Lvater resource managument. c? w..vvwv b n BOARD MEETING DATES March 28, 2007 April 25, 2007 May 23, 2007 June 27, 2007 *July 18, 2007 August 22, 2007 September 26, 2007 October 24, 2007 November 28, 2007 *December 19, 2007 January 23, 2008 February 27, 2008 *Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month H:\dept\gmo1150\151\BS\Agenda\2007 Meeting Noboes\MN02.2.doc Y r � . b :U9 _ CALIFORNIA STRATEGIC GROWTH PLAN FLOOD CONTROL, WATER SUPPLY & CONVEYANCE JAN UARY 2007 The California Department of Water Resources G e' ice, - ZV' �� FLOOD CONTROL, WATER SUPPLY AND CONVEYANCE ast year,the Governor and Legislature initiated the first phase of a comprehensive Strategic Growth Plan (SGP)to address California's critical infrastructure needs over the next 20 years. In November 2006,the voters approved the first installment of that 20-year vision to rebuild California. The infrastructure package included water and flood measures in Propositions 1E and 84.These measures provided $4.9 billion for flood management and approximately$1 billion for integrated regional water management including wastewater recycling, groundwater storage, conservation, and other water management actions. In January 2007,the Administration proposed an additional $5.95 billion to augment the existing funding for the SGP through 2016. These new investments in water management will address population growth, climate change and environmental needs. The proposed $5.95 billion will ensure reliable water supplies and help California cope with climate change effects: • Water Storage-$4.5 billion Water Resources Water Conservation ($2.5 billion general obligation bonds Stewardship $0.2bRGon and $2.0 billion revenue bonds) $0.25 billion • Delta Sustainability-$1.0 billion (general obligation bonds) Delta SustainabiNRy:) _ • Water Resources Stewardship-$250 million $1.0billion M e d billion - (general obligation bonds) • Water Conservation -$200 million Watar Storage-$4.sbiwan (general obligation bonds) 02MIo-arena!boads) Accomplishments to Date Much progress has been made so far. Three policy documents outline the issues and strategies already considered to ensure California's water future: • California Water Plan Update (2005)is a strategic plan for meeting future water demands. It recommends two initiatives to ensure reliable water supplies: integrated regional water management and improved water management systems. • Flood Warnings:Responding to California's Flood Crisis (2005)called for flood management improvements and reforms to reduce the potential for such disasters in California. • Progress on Incorporating Climate Change Into Management of California's Water Resources (2006)provided the first detailed analysis of climate change on water and flood management. To help put these plans into action, the Governor and Legislature have consistently supported major investments in water management and flood protection. General Fund support for the •E Department of Water Resources flood ]n management program has grown from ,,, k $14.4 million in 2004-05 to $55.3 million in 2006-07.Assembly Bill 142 provided ,p " .. an additional$500 million to fund urgently-needed flood protection projects throughout the state. 2003-20ot 2004_2005 20M-20M 20 -2007 General Fund support for DWR Division of Hood Management THE CALIFORNIA STRATEGIC GROWTH PLAN 3 Following the Governor's emergency declaration for the flood system in February 2006, key repairs to 33 critical erosion sites protecting Central Valley communities were completed in record time.The state is now advancing funds and working with the federal government to repair 71 additional levee erosion sites damaged in last year's floods. An unprecedented effort to evaluate 350 miles of urban levees for hidden defects has begun, and the state is leading a coordinated effort involving federal and local agencies to avoid a major flood disaster in California. 2008 Bond Measure for Water Supply, Flood Management and Conveyance Two critical areas remain unaddressed that are Reduction in Snowpack due to Climate Change vital to ensuring that California has reliable water supplies and is able to cope with the effects that climate change will have on water supply and flood protection: storage and conveyance. 15MAFTotal Current trends and climate models suggest a loss Snow Pack Storage of at least a quarter of the snowmelt runoff by (1956-2000 average) 2050. Warmer weather would ultimately mean more flooding in the winter, and less runoff from snow during the spring. 25%reduction With greater conservation measures and by By2050 expanding the state's water management and delivery system, including surface storage, groundwater storage and conveyance facilities, California can prepare for these changes. In this phase of the SGP,the Administration proposes a total of$5.95 billion through 2016. Of this amount, general obligation bonds will provide$3.95 billion and revenue bonds will provide$2.0 billion.The proposal includes: Water Storage -$4.5 billion ($2.5 billion general obligation bonds and $2 billion revenue bonds). This funding will be dedicated to the development of additional storage, which would most likely occur Skes Reservoir near Sites on the west side of the Sacramento Valley and Temperance Flat on the San Joaquin River east of Fresno. Water supply yield from the proposed reservoirs U ipwaP.EE'riat could provide up to 500,000 acre-feet per year. Additional benefits could include better flood protection, water for fisheries management and wildlife refuges, and improvements in drinking water quality. The water storage costs would be shared-$2 billion in general obligation bonds would be used to finance the state's portion of the projects for benefits such as flood control, ecosystem restoration, and water quality improvements that serve the state in general. The non-state portion would be funded from$2 billion in revenue bonds secured by contract payments from the water suppliers who would benefit from the new storage. In addition to investments in surface storage,$500 million in general obligation bonds will be dedicated for grants to augment local investment in groundwater storage projects, providing an additional 500,000 acre-feet of annual yield. 4-THE CALIFORNIA STRATEGIC GROWTH PLAN Delta Sustainability-$1.0 billion (general obligation bonds). Leveraging anticipated federal and local funding sources,this funding will help implement a sustainable resource management plan for the Delta. In September 2006,the Governor signed an executive order to develop a "durable vision for sustainable management of the Delta," a unique natural resource that provides estuarine habitat for resident and migratory fish and ;r•Y_y birds including threatened and endangered species. It is a prime recreational and cultural destination as well as California's most significant source of drinking and agricultural water. However, scientists have affirmed that the current health of the Delta's '} ecosystem and its use as a reliable water conveyance corridor - are not sustainable over the long-term. These investments would pay a portion of the public benefit costs and leverage significant water user investments in upgrading water conveyance The Delta infrastructure through the Delta. Recent findings suggest a two in three chance of catastrophic flooding in or near the Delta in the next 50 years due to earthquakes or storms. An earthquake could liquefy the foundations of Delta levees. Major highway corridors could be inundated. Intrusion of salt water in the Delta would shut down the Central Valley and State Water Projects for months and cause long-term reduction in water quality when service was resumed. The economy of California and the nation would suffer major negative impacts. This collective investment will help reduce the seismic risk to water supplies derived from the Delta, protect drinking water quality and reduce conflict between water management and environmental protection. Water Resources Stewardship - $250 million (general obligation bonds).This funding would support implementation of Klamath River restoration, provide for elements of Salton Sea restoration identified in the Salton Sea Restoration Act and related legislation enacted in 2003, contribute to restoration actions on the San Joaquin River, and supplement A magnitude 6.5 or greater earthquake in the Delta could result successful restoration projects on the in 30levee breaks and draw salt water from the San Francisco Sacramento River and its tributaries as Bay into the Delta, cutting off water deliveries to23million well as in the Delta. Californians. Water Conservation - $200 million (general obligation bonds.This funding will augment$1 billion pruvided by Proposiiion 84 and support the Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) program. IRWM encourages regional strategies to protect communities from drought, protect and improve water quality, and reduce dependence on imported water. The proposed funding will provide targeted water conservation grants to local communities. These investments in water conservation will yield about 200,000 acre-feet per year-enough to meet the water needs for about 400,000 families. Funded projects could also protect water quality, conserve energy, reduce urban and agricultural runoff, and reduce urban effluent. Salton Sea THE CALIFORNIA STRATEGIC GROWTH PLAN - 5 ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE & TIME: (BEAMISH) .......................ANDERSON................... (SHANKS) ........................ANTOS ......................... Y (QUIRK) ...........................BANKHEAD................... ;✓ (CAVECCHE)....................DUMITRU ................... (KANG)..............................CHOI.......................... v (AYER)..............................CRANDALL................... (ROSEN)...........................DALTON....................... (PALMER).........................DAVERT...................... ✓ (OOTEN)...........................FERRYMAN............. .. (REESE)............................FRESCHI (HANSEN) ........................GREEN ...................... ✓ 81�37, i7.3//, LW(-7 d7856 jo793/ NARAIN .LUEBBEN... (DOW)...............................MARSHALL.................. (REINHART) .....................MILLER ......................... (GARCIA)..........................MOORE........................ +� (KRIPPNER) .....................NEUGEBAUER.............. ✓ (VACANT) .........................NORBY....................... (DRISCOLL)......................PARKER....................... (CADENA) ........................SHAWVER.................. (KRING) ............................SIDHU.......................... i L4� S J1o3 t�33, 8�kly� g�a3o, 27-79 (BENAVIDES) ...................TINAJERO.................... 973�-3 (AGUIRRE) .......................UNDERHILL ................. 7V73 (RODRIGUEZ) ..................WALDMAN.................... (DAIGLE) ..........................WEBB .......................... (ANDERSON) ...................WINDER ...................... STAFF: �a � Arhontes ✓ rn�G Colson Ghirelli Herber Kovac Kyle Ruth Torres Tyner OTHERS: �,.. Hogin 02/28/07 H:\dept\admin\BS\DIRECTOR\Directors Roll Call.doc ,1�. . SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) �v If /1VA Gr'�f -T �� H:1WP.DTAIADMINIBSIFORMSISIGN-IN FORM.DOC REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS C� All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: O AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) U aG HOME ADDRESS: 41 7 1& d .. (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: coC ) c� v REPRESENTING: = (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: L ! Z 0 a7 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) I HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) / q (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: r dt) AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: C',' a V( (numbe(street) (city/zi code) TELEPHONE: ( ) 2 Z1- REPRESENTING: I ' I f (self/name of organization) STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on 2007, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on . �ca�,. ��/ , 2007. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 2007. Penny M. Kyle, Secretary Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District H:\DEPT\GMO\150\151\BS\FORMSIAGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC Distributed at �/ Board Meeting February 28, 2007 MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Jame6 �(Ruth General Manager SUBJECT: Strategic Initiatives Report I am pleased to report excellent progress on the ten strategic initiatives we have been working on for the past year. Work on five initiatives is completed, four are still in progress and one initiative is on hold. We are on track to complete work on the remaining initiatives by the end of the year with the exception of the Information Technology Strategic Plan. A status update on each initiative is attached. JDR:gg HAdept\gnno\110\110 Adrr n\RUTH JAMES\Status Reports to Board\2007 GM Status reports\022807 Ten Initiatives Status Report.doc OCSD FY 06/07 STRATEGIC INITIATIVES February 28, 2007 INITIATIVES Sponsor Description December 2006 Status Nick I. Local Sewer Services COMPLETED Arhontes Decide the agency's role in local sewer ownership, operations Except for finalization of the Local Sewer Service and maintenance issues, adjust the business plan and funding Revenue Adequacy Study report, due for completion in needs accordingly, and/or transfer the assets to another the coming quarter, the initiative is complete. owner. Nick 2. Secondary Treatment Interim Operations COMPLETED Arhontes We are continuously operating secondary facilities to produce the best quality effluent possible, consistent with the Board's 2002 Resolution, although it is more than we need to meet our interim effluent limits. This initiative revisits the intent of the Board and assures that there is an understating as to how we are operating, the costs and risks in doing so, and to be in agreement with what is being done. Ed 3. Research Evaluation and Alignment COMPLETED Torres Research includes a range of activities carried out by various The initiative is complete and a consultant RFP has been divisions for many reasons, including regulatory compliance, issued for Development of the Research Strategic Plan. operational problem solving, design information generation, and environmental stewardship. This initiative seeks to identify program structure and other changes that will improve the success of these efforts while ensuring they are consistent with OCSD's agencies priorities and needs. Ed Torres 4. Odor Nuisance Policy COMPLETED Develop an odor policy that establishes a level of service that A workshop with the Board is planned to pursue funding will be implemented through future capital investment. for three CIP projects to address goals of this initiative. 1 OCSD FY 06/07 STRATEGIC INITIATIVES February 28, 2007 INITIATIVES Sponsor Description December 2006 Status Ed 5. Engine Emission Compliance ONGOING Torres Develop an engine (diesel and gas)emissions compliance The team continued work on the original plan. Tasks strategy and an OCSD policy to meet AQMD requirements, initiated this period include: which will be implemented through future capital investment. . Start Up and begin testing of catalyst and pretreatment on large gas engines • Review of draft emission study and discussions with consultant • Development of final report and brief the management and executive management teams • Evaluation of health risks from Diesel engines as defined by upcoming state regulations Lorenzo 6. Business Plan COMPLETED Tyner Develop a strategic business planning process and a long- The team completed the Business Plan for FY 2006-07 on term sustainable business plan that establishes program time and within budget. objectives and initiatives to fulfill OCSD's vision and mission. The purpose of the business plan is to document and coordinate all of the agency's strategic objectives, communicate these to all affected stakeholders, and provide a tool to instill accountability across the organization for meeting the strategic objectives. Nick 7. Asset Management Program ONGOING Arhontes Continue to implement an agency-wide asset management The team continued work on the original plan. Tasks program to minimize the total cost of asset ownership leading completed this period include: to better business decision-making across the agency. Asset Management Plan, Business Risk Exposure Model, Life Cycle Costing Manual, CIP Validation, and a Strategic Risk Assessment Report 2 OCSD FY 06/07 STRATEGIC INITIATIVES February 28, 2007 INITIATIVES Sponsor Description December 2006 Status Ed 8. Manacle and Optimize a Sustainable Biosolids Program ONGOING Tones Manage biosolids in a long-term, cost-effective, The team continued work on the original plan. Tasks environmentally-sensitive and socially acceptable manner that initiated this period include: optimizes the increasing volume of biosolids produced from Negotiation of long-term management contracts with the wastewater system. EnerTech (energy production) and Synagro (compost), and creation of an in-county biosolids compost use program Jim Herberg 9. Plan and Manage a sustainable Capital Improvement ONGOING Program The team continued work on the original plan. Tasks Plan and manage the Capital Improvement Program to completed this period include: optimize investments in infrastructure balancing level of An ACSE Peer Review of our CIP management service, risk, and user rates. program and presented findings to the Board of Directors Lorenzo 10. Enterprise Information Technology Strategic Plan ON HOLD Tyner Develop and implement an Enterprise Information Technology All work was suspended pending an independent Strategic Plan which will support OCSD's business plan and evaluation of the Information Technology Department. guide the acquisition, management, and use of information technology within the agency for a three to five year period. AdepAgmo111MGM1STRATEGIC PLAMStrategic Initiatives r5 022807.doc 3 Distributed at Board Meeting February 21, 2007 MEMORANDUM ' TO: Chair and Members of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: James D. Ruth General Manager, Orange County Sanitation District SUBJECT: February Status Report In accordance with my approved work plan for 2006-07, the following progress report for the month of February is submitted for your consideration. 1. Annual Report The upgraded Annual Report has been completed and will be distributed to the member of the Board in this month's packet. The report can also be accessed through our website and will serve as a progress report on our operations and accomplishments, but will also serve as a very valuable educational tool to better inform our rate payers on the value of our environmental stewardship. 2. Design-Build Legislation After months of negotiation, we have finally received support from the IBEW and Plumbers Unions for our proposed legislative bill. Senator Lou Correa has agreed to sponsor the bill which should be introduced by February 23rd 3. Succession Plan The plan is 95% complete and will be presented to the Administrative Committee at their March 14tn meeting. Copies will be included in the March packet for Board members. 4. SARI Line Staff has been informed by Jerry Thibeault, Executive Director of the Santa Ana Water Quality Control Board, of the intention to issue a cease and desist order against OCSD and SAWPA for failure to protect the SARI line. Their board has not officially taken action on this matter but will consider the staffs recommendation at their next board meeting on April 20tt'. A meeting of the policy committee will be held at the County Hall of Administration on Thursday, March gtn 5. Resignation -Virginia Grebbien, General Manager, Orange County Water District After Virginia's announcement, I met with Water District staff to assure them of our continued support and coordination on the Ground Water Replenishment System (GWRS) and commitment to work with them on a smooth transition. 6. Engineering The Fast Track Team has been assembled under the direction of Mark Esquer and is in the process of organizing and prioritizing the work to be done, preparing plans and specifications for bidding. There are approximately 150-200 small but important projects that need to be completed. 7. Information Technology The organizational assessment has been completed, and the final report and recommendations are due February 28t'. Several organizational options are being considered with a final decision due by March 14t'. 8. Management Training The Profession of Management training program for OCSD supervisors will begin on March 13 through 15. Eighteen supervisors will be enrolled in the program. The Extraordinary Leadership program for the Executive Management Team will begin on March 6t'. 9. Labor Negotiations Meetings are on going with all six labor units - exchanged proposals with Unit 501, Supervisors & Professionals, and OCEA. Additional meetings and follow up are scheduled for early March. 10.CIP Budget The proposed CIP Budget will be reviewed with each of our standing committees at our scheduled March meetings. JDR:gg H:Wept\gmo11101110 Admin\RUTH JAMES1Status Reports to Board12007 GM Status reportsk022107 Monthly Status Report.doc reo eti U7 02: 42p Carol --:,,,9d-r-APP p- 1 Distributed at ��-� - Board Meeting HOGAN GUINEY DICK LLP A I_IMrTED UARII I'rY PAH MERSHIP 225 $ROADWAY. SUITE 1 900 SAN DIEGO, CAUPORNIA 92 10 1 TEL: 619-W-02fl2 FAX: 619-2346466 FacsimileTransmittal To: Board of Directors, OCSD Date: February 28, 2007 James D. Ruth, General Mgr. Bradley R. Hogin Stephen D. Schuett Fax#: 714-962-0356 Pages: 2S including this cover sheet 714-962-0356 714-835-7787 661-868-3805 From: Michael M. Hogan Subject: Orange County Sanitation District Consent Agenda Item No. 8 (c ) Addendum to Final Program Environmental Impact Report for 1999 Strategic Plan COMMENTS: Please see attached correspondence submitted on behalf of the County of Kern,which should be considered by the Board of Directors and included in the record of proceedings of the above matter. Thank you_ PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL All information transmitted hereby is intended only for the use of the addressee(s)named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended rccipient(s),please note that any distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Anyone who receives this communication in error should notify us immediately by telephone and return the original message to us at the above address via the U.S. Postal Scrvice. Transmission Problems—(619)687-0288 Received 20-02-2007 15:28 From-619 234 6466 To-OCSD Page 001 ur_. -rep L-mr-UL O its-G;J4-b4Eib P. HOGAN GuiNF-Y DICK LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP MICHAEL M.HOGAN Ta • 619-687-0282 FAx. 619-234-64" JJ ? mhogan@hgdlaw.com i, February 29,2007 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Re: Consent Calendar Agenda Item No.80 Addendum to Final Program Environmental Impact Report(PEIR) for the 1999 Strategic Plan Dear Members of the Board: We represent the County of Kern("Kern County),which submits this letter pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21177 to inform you of its objection to approval of the matter described above. We also have enclosed a copy of our previous letter,dated December 20,2006, which identifies other deficiencies in the proposed addendum. Please include these lepers in the record of your proceedings concerning the above matter as required by Public Resources Code section 21167.6(e). Kern County objects to your approval of the Addendum to Final Program Environmental Impact Report(PEIR)for the 1999 Strategic Plan because it fails to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA`J and the decision of the California Court of Appeal in County Sanitation Dist. No. 2 v County of Kem 127 CalAppAth 1544(2005)in the following additional ways: 1. OCSD failed to comply with its obligation under CEQA to provide notice to and to consult with responsible agencies, trustee agencies or other public agencies who may have an interest in the proposed projects discussed in the Addendum, including Kern County and the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District("STVAPCD'). OCSD also failed to provide any notice or opportunity for the public to review and comment on the adequacy of the Addendum. 2. The Addendum and responses to comments are inadequate because they rely upon the analysis of traffic, air quality and noise impacts contained in a thirteen-year-old Negative Declaration prepared by the Regional Water 225 BItOADWAY,Sun-u 1900,SAN r)rrrtaa,CAI.11"OFMIA 92101 TI+.j_619-687-0288 Recelved 28-02-200T 15:28 From-619 234 6466 To-000 Page 002 618-234-6466 p. 3 HOGAN G[mNav D1cK Board of Directors February 29,2007 Page 2 Quality Control Board ("RWQCB') and thus fail to reflect the changed circumstances which have in Kern County with respect to such impacts. 3. The Addendum and responses to comments fail to analyze the physical impacts to roads on the biosolids haul routes in Kern County as required by Appendix G, section XV(d). We previously provided you with copies of information which OCSD has had in its possession since 1999, showing the substantial damage to Kern County roads caused by the incompatibility of heavy trucks hauling biosolids using roads designed for farm purposes. 4. The Addendum and responses to comments fail to analyze the potential land use impacts of the 2000 Magan contract. The fact that OCSD is finally performing environmental review of the 2000 Magan contract, seven years later than it should have, does not mean the Addendum can ignore the existing conditions with respect to the project. In particular,the Addendum and responses to comments fail to address the land use impacts, including conflicts with adopted local ordinances, of the 2000 Magan contract in light of Kings County Ordinance No. 592, which allows the land application of only EQ-Compost on the portions of Tole Ranch in Kings County,and Kern County's Measure E, which prohibits the land application of biosolids in the unincorporated area of Kern County. Among other things, the Addendum and responses to comments fail to analyze the potential impacts to air quality that may result from increases in the length and direction of OCSD's biosolids truck haul routes caused by changes in these ordinances. Since OCSD has asserted in various lawsuits that these ordinances will require it to haul its biosolids longer distances to Arizona,with attendant traffic and air quality impacts,the Addendum must analyze these potential impacts. 5. The Addendum states that biosolids subject to the 2000 Magan contract are land applied in Kern County pursuant to waste discharge requiremerns issued by the RWQCB Order 94-253. However, the State Water Quality Control Board adopted General Order 2004-0012DWQ in July, 2004, which superseded RWQCB Order 94-253. There is no mention in the Addendum of the fact that;on May 31,2001,the RWQCB notified Magan in writing that his existing waste discharge requirement orders were rescinded and he must apply for coverage under the State Water Board's Gcncral Order. 6. The Addendum also fails to address the fact that,on December 13, 2006,the RWQCB notified OCSD and Magan,in writing,that"the existing Ordcrs are ten or more years old and not fully reflective of current regulations and site operations." The RWQCB requested specific information from OCSD and Magan to enable it to update the orders. Finally, the RWQCB requested a Recelved 28-02-2007 15:28 From-619 234 6466 To-OCSO Page 003 Carol 619-234-6466 p. 4 HoGAN GumEV DICK Board of Directors February 28,2007 Page 3 meeting with OCSD and Magan"to discuss the pending issuance of updated WDRs and the rescission of the current WDRs." There is no mention in the Addendum or the responses to comments concerning the RWQCB's request, its intention to rescind the existing orders and to issue updated orders,or the applicability of State Water Board General Order 2004-0012DWQ. A copy of the RWQCB's request is enclosed. 7. The Addendum and responses to comments continue to ignore the mandate of the Court of Appeal in County Sanitation Dist. No. 2 v. County of Kern, 127 Cal.AppAth 1544 (2005), to consider the potential environmental impacts of their actions on the welfare of the surrounding region. The Addendum fails to comply with the decision of the Court of Appeal because it fails to discuss potential impacts on the regional welfare of shipping increasing amounts of biosolids out of Orange County for disposal in other counties, including Kern and Kings counties. R. The Addendum also fails to address the SJVAPCD's Proposed New Rule 4565, which prescribes requirements for the land application of biosolids, including a requirement that biosolids be incorporated into the soil wihtin three hours after delivery to the land application site. In light of the San Joaquin Air Basin's serious non attainment status for the federal 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards,the Addendum's failure to consider this regulation renders its analysis of potential air quality impacts inadequate. The Addendum is clearly inadequate and fails to comply with the requirements of CEQA and the decision of the Court of Appeal. Accordingly, we request that you reject the staff recommendation to adopt the Addendum and instead direct staff to prepare an initial study leading to either an EIR or negative declaration that adequately studies the potential environmental impacts of the proposed projects. Thank you. Sincerely, t -"'I i i "i P l Michael M.Hogan MMH Attachments cc: Stephen D. Schuett,Assistant County Counsel Bradley R. Hogan, General Counsel, OCSD Received 28-02-2007 15:28 From-619 234 6466 To-OOSO Page 004 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held one 2007, was duly posted for public 61 inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on Cuuc.:� , 2007. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of , 2007. Penny M.'Kyle, Secretary Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District H:\DEPT\GMO\150\151\BS\FORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC February 21, 2007 MI. MEMORANDUM ' TO: Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District �� FROM: Jame D.Q Ruth General Manager SUBJECT: Annual Report Attached is a copy of our new 2005/06 Annual Report for your review. This report has been designed to serve two purposes. First, as an annual report, it summarizes our key accomplishments of the past year. Second, as an educational piece, it introduces readers to our mission, processes and inner workings to help readers better understand what we do. This year's theme of"Making Everyday Possible"was decided upon to emphasize our agency's contributions to the community, allowing people to continue enjoying a healthy environment and lifestyle in which to live, work and play. In the coming weeks, we will be distributing this piece to a variety of audiences, including elected officials, local city staffs, industry associations, environmental agencies and regulators and employees. Please contact me if you have questions regarding this Annual Report. Additional copies are available to you by contacting Bret Colson at (714) 593-7120. JDR:BC:gg HAdep1%admin11101RUTH JAMES1Corres 2 00611 5 1 70 6 Paula Zeller congrats JDR memo.doc 1� r 1 Orangc County Sanitation District �(I uW 41 �► s"i . av i L�Thew hatle been lots of changes in Orange Counig ouc the years and although things here are bigger and more complicawd than it used to be, we still wouldn't (.c}ant to lit)(' anywhere else. Vice-es always something to do all the tirne, ellerg sin(/le day Of the year. "!'hat makes this a groat place to be fOr people like us and our family.9f Larry and Margaret MUrhlicy I'muilain Valley ti ���.y�cc —a�` yr' �•(• •' ` ycv_dlTi, f .�' L'.ae. 1 . All, y�,. /• � 41 _ w �i-.: •� _ ter. 10 �"'Iss — • Working for you every single day Every single day, much of what we do goes by with little fanfare. But without fail, we work hard to protect the lives and lifestyles of the 2.5 million people we're charged -� with serving. Quite simply, we do that by treating about 240 million gallons of wastewater - enough to fill Anaheim Stadium three times - every day. Nearly 80 percent of that water comes from homes - sinks, toilets, showers, laundry and dishwashers. The rest comes from businesses, retail stores, hotels, - offices, restaurants, � t i manufacturers and other industries. What tue do is real in-)lx)rtant Jor coerybody LvIlo lit►es in the at eats that a le take care of. Thinys a could not ve as nice as they (it-(, if* i(le didn't do the (pest.joh tt e could all the tithe. Tlhat_; tOul t take !ride in my aurk, knoucing that Fni heIj)inct nirrke th(, lit les or other 1)(-ol)le better every day, f7 Ray Navarro OC-SD Mainienjin(:e Worker For over 50 years, we've made We work hard, we work smart and we're efficient in what sure this essential system works we do. We reclaim up to 10 million gallons of treated 24 hours a day, seven days water every day, which is ultimately used for landscape a week. That's no small task, irrigation and injection into the seawater intrusion barrier. considering we safely collect, I�, We operate our own central power plant that generates treat and dispose of wastewater more than 14,000 kilowatts of energy every day from from 470 square miles in central burning natural gas and methane gas. We also recycle and northwestern Orange County. It's a big job covering more than 230,000 tons of biosolids every year for a big area, making us the third largest wastewater agency agricultural uses. west of the Mississippi River. Our rate payers benefit from the efforts of our Board and Our 644 employees maintain a complex system of pipes, staff. Residential user fees average less than $14 per PUMPS stations and processing facilities so that people month, one of the lowest rates in the state. That is quite an can go about living, working and playing without giving accomplishment since the average Californian spends us more than a passing thought. But the reality is that more than double that amount for sewer service. In short, Orange County's sewer system is a multi-billion dollar we have dedicated I' public investment that must be constantly monitored to ourselves to taking care preserve the public's health and the quality of life. We of you every single day, l ,t oversee a large and diverse network of facilities including doing our part in making " T 581 miles of pipelines, 16 pumping stations, treatment everyday possible for plants in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach and a the people we serve. 58-foot ocean monitoring boat out of Newport Harbor. .- maw t -• 4'slial + _ r i _ `` _ - - - _ _ _ �✓� I Imle (win(j (nit to the !retch coliether its for a long quiet walk. or to do somc sketching or to.just play/ in the surf. F(w aw thc beach is nnc of the most beautiful, natural advantages about hiring in Orange Count) and thcas allig I trg to c ( m)e here as often as I can. Yuri Campbell Newt>on Beach �C•�4 Reaching OL-It to the comm«nitV We think the best way to protect our environment is by partnering with other - agencies and the public to keep Orange County S clean and safe. Our �,, employees actively work at forming strong coalitions for the sole purpose of ensuring our beaches, ocean waters and wildlife are protected. For more than 30 years, we've partnered with the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board in an extensive ocean monitoring program. Our ocean monitoring vessel, the 58-foot Nerissa, crisscrosses 35 square miles of ocean ��7'hc e►u�irc,u►►u nic►1 l,rr,tc c tic,►i work it)(' clu tr►r(st I)e c•c,rt)l,1enuc►)tec1 I)l/ leaden)() tr, I,rc,tec t tho e►u}irc»urtcv►r c►s well. 'niki►uo e(trc, of sl)ecic►I I,luc c s like uttr bectclus caul Hie c,c-c Otis (it cutr' bac k- doo l- is (► I)i(j.ic,l) u►u J t c'c c'u►►'t do it idol w. Th(' n u,re I u•c,l�lc clot ilwolt'(-d. ►1w eusic r it is to I)reselve caul c► bloc' it'(' ull cull Iu�tru,. ff Jeff ,�\n list rol19 OCSD Scnic,r tii ici msi 1 along 1 1 miles of coastline, from Seal Beach to Corona information cards were Del Mar. Sampling locations include 17 shoreline distributed to pharmacies. water quality stations, 17 offshore water quality stations, We also contacted 300 l 49 stations to assess bottom-dwelling organisms and home-owner associations, sediment chemistry, and nine trawl stations to evaluate and worked with the y_ r fish and macro-invertebrate communities. media to raise awareness We participate in special regional studies that cover a about this growing environmental concern. much broader area ranging from Point Conception, Another way we educated the public was through the west of Santa Barbara, to Mexico. We also work closely creation of our Fats, Oils and Grease Program, because with the University of Southern California Sea Grant one of the largest causes of beach closures are sewer Program, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, the overflows caused by fats, oils and grease. University of California, Los Angeles and other universities. We also think it's important for the public to understand Public education is a critical part of our outreach efforts. the importance of wastewater treatment in protecting By educating the public, they help us by becoming public health and the environment. To accomplish this, ambassadors for cleaner air, land and water. With that we conducted 70 tours of our treatment plant facilities for in mind, this year we launched close to 1 ,000 people over the past year. More than a pharmaceutical outreach 70 employees also volunteered 635 hours of community program called "No Drugs service by participating in speaking engagements and Down the Drain" to teach t working on events such as Earth Day, Arbor Day and people the right way to dispose the Children's Water Festival. of their prescriptions and medications. Almost one million O(:SU - Makijig Every(Liv Ul)I[)Jt LUUJI?N AOZ " s�iss<n1151Iq .n ro ptio s�tiroci .nur s�►[rurnf ►r)o l.).)lc).rci of amid u► lnci si)►nnEj.)jrrs ptit) 5.).xrt)10(1 r)til •syj.)t.p I)til dlop.).rddr) m) oc •wig .)til fo pto )til it-) sn f) Ito .r()l*a:)OId .►. log D si s►til 'unscra of lcr6r.1 nil (itu of fiq rrrcrr)ccrcito:) dtil .rof).rn(i .rr)O5 oi) of [itr►itIOM ctr(Vf,$)ctro-) tis.�.r.►r)s lrxil fc� l.rt)�1 •,).►dLjmf►,),m .mr) atil 1tm.rnop"' .r r) (1rr)c) 01 a_)vici t►),mb 1) sr rltrr)o;) 91 G_ � N i r r Y ME iw7V"-AFppmL--INN do � ! tj ir,a� i I t } r ��` '�t' + �� i!• \ L •.� - - _ R- mow• -!MA o � M ' ', � �a411+•�. _ ��\� � , •�pis a.i..i '♦ ` A' / -i , i -q •r...■."_ .::sue:.=r;• • • • 'L' - Our scientific approach protects the public A big part of our job at OCSD is protecting the public's health by closely monitoring treatment processes at our plants and working with businesses to prevent problems before they occur. Our award-winning source control program closely regulates the amount of toxic pollutants that can enter the sewer by issuing permits to businesses to ensure �n that pollutants are eliminated or significantly reduced in the sewer system. Businesses that w \Q, ore olcrycitfS working towoi- ls./inding I owi, waJs to halan(v I)rote(.tion of I)ttlAW health with the httsilw-SS net•cls t.tttcl the IifcstJles of the I)eoE,)le of Orange Oninig. Two of ottr t•turent goals itu'lcaie de()eloI)in(J ttiags to test forl)ret�ioctslg IIndmecl(l h, IeUeIS of contctnunctnt� it reCYclt°tl Il (MY. anti sanx-cittg Ixwwria testirul tnethotl.,4 for heath wwer. Ch-arlie McGee 0(:SD I_01) Supc rvisc�r release wastewater into our six miles offshore. We also test ocean sediments to assess END,sewers must meet strict bottom-dwelling organisms and sediment chemistry. The regulations and are routinely - - - combined analysis from these samplings gives us a clear sampled and inspected. If picture of the health of the ocean on a daily basis and •w violations occur, the District _. --- helps us protect people and marine life from potential responds swiftly with warnings, harmful situations. fines and criminal charges. Research projects are currently under way to improve our An integral part of our compliance and monitoring efforts operations by identifying new or different processes or are centered around OCSD's state-of-the-art Environmental equipment that can be used. For example, laboratory Sciences Laboratory. It is staffed by highly qualified and processing methods currently require 24 hours to complete. experienced professionals to ensure businesses meet all During this time, swimmers may be exposed to poor regulations for water quality as well as monitoring OCSD's water quality, placing their health in jeopardy. To alleviate air emissions and the processing of biosolids. that, OCSD is working with the Southern California Each year, our lab analyzes more than 100,000 samples, Coastal Water Research ?.— - testing for bacteria and over 100 other compounds that Project Authority to id more rap id p °' can be harmful to people and the environment. That develop • , � ._ -- means we can guarantee only highly treated wastewater assessment methods that - �V would allow for same-day is released through our 200 foot deep, five mile long . ocean pipeline. water quality warnings. i As part of our compliance and testing efforts, we also take samples from the ocean at 17 sites extending up to ' I . • - .•�►r,�OFF�'Si�' =�'.t t '�S, - � ?t• _, ,-_ �;'�-..- :+:.� f4 r��-`.. +•_-�✓ � may, 'l�d�-'�'a Clean air, nice Leaches and parks, and lots of outdoor activities all year round. Tho�c' are some important reasons why use lice in Orange County. WS very important to my husband and 1 that this area stays that way for my children as they grow Lip. We card deeply that evergthing possible is being done to ensure that they'll have a healthy place to cull hone for many years to come.�I Erin and Mathew Baxter La Flabra ' �i.sue */ `-. •, y 1 S ! j, A. _ '` t r r '�i�. �tC '�YY� '�+ fir �� - `► h '1,: r1 c As . +' �y. �' d, yii 1` .�fe• t` h _.;, �4�j• fi „y,` .. l IL, r S ,4r—At _�.• .fso _ ;�r��.s �,,,,r� • ' r <--J.c. r OCSD - Moking Grcn'day Po ssil)lc 15 Making tomorrow possible Our commitment to i preserve a healthy way of life for the people of Orange County extends well into the future with an aggressive, ongoing ""f series of capital improvements, programs and partnerships. More than $2.4 billion in projects are already being built or in the planning stages over the next several years as i7.. part of our Capital Improvement Program. This includes almost 140 projects at both of our treatment plants, 16 pump stations and 44 large sewer trunklines. We also have a number of cooperative projects underway to help local cities upgrade their sewers. My children are my uiorld and their future means everything to me. 7 hat brings special meaning to my work because 1 make sure emissions were releasing from generators are within health and safety standards. By doing my job, Im doing my part to make sure my children grow? cq) in a clean and healthy etwironment, and that keeps me motivated to do my job well every day. 7f CI-110e Dao OCSD Engineer During the past year alone, we completed 16 capital agreement with four JW I improvement projects and laid 20,000 feet of new 5-year options calls for - pipe. These accomplishments were highlighted by the OCSD to supply EnerTech commissioning of a new trickling filter facility, the first in with 200 daily tons of a series of milestone events as part of the district's move biosolids that will be to full secondary treatment. recycled into a high-grade Another important project that will protect our future is renewable fuel to augment a nearby cement plant in the final phases of construction. The Groundwater power supply. Ash from the fuel will be used as a cement Replenishment System, a jointly funded project of OCSD additive resulting in zero solid waste. EnerTech is building and the Orange County Water District, is slated to begin a facility in Rialto, and they expect to begin converting operation in Fall 2007. It will produce 70 million gallons biosolids to fuel by early 2008. of purified water every day and return it to the Orange Complementing this new energy efficient effort is our County Groundwater Basin, either by injection along the ongoing program of generating electric power from gases coast to protect the basin from seawater intrusion, or by produced by the wastewater treatment process. Recycling percolation in ponds in Anaheim. As a result, Orange captured methane generates more than 14,000 kilowatts County will have a quality, reliable, local water supply of energy daily, roughly the equivalent of enough power for decades to come. to supply the needs of a city the size of Brea or Cypress. Our ability to effectively protect Instead, we use this power to run our central generation the region's environment well into power plants. This year, OCSD saved $8.3 million in the future was also strengthened power that would otherwise have to be purchased from by the creation of a partnership Southern California Edison. with EnerTech Environmental, Inc. this past year. The 10 year 1i ()c si) - Makin}; I'Ossi1)1v 17 OCSD Financial Results ■ The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a series of large construction improvements in progress or planned over the next several years that will allow the District to provide an appropriate level of service to our rate payers. The CIP provides for the management and implementation of these improvements. The outlay for the CIP in FY 2005-06 was $260.8 million. ■ Debt Service is the cost of repaying long-term debt. Long-term debt financing allows the District to complete large multi-year capital projects by providing funds not always immediately available. The outlay for debt service in FY 2005-06 was $41 .9 million. ■ Operating Expenses allocates resources to operate, maintain and manage our sewage collection, treatment and disposal system and any associated administrative or technical requirements. Operating expenses for FY 2005-06 were $109.7 million. ■ Intradistrict Transfers are expenditures related to other affiliated agencies. Intradistrict Transfers for FY 2005-06 were $9.3 million. ■ The District's "AK Rating is one of the highest for a government agency. To maintain this rating, the District adheres to its 2001 Debt Policy and coverage ratios requirements. This Board-adopted policy serves as a guide in the management of existing debts and in the issuance of future debt. I H \Biking Everydoy PossiNe Other $4.3M ��% Debi Proceeds CIP $200M $260.8M 22% 29% Interest Beginning $10.4M Ending Designated —' 1% Designated Reserves Reserves $472M Property Tax $490M 52% $40M Debi 53% 4% $41 .9M 5�o Fees $185M Operating 20% $109.7M Intradistrict 12% $9.3M 1% OCSD Financial ReSURS (continued) In FY 2005-06, total revenues increased $41 .5 million, or a 22.7 percent increase over the prior year, primarily due to the $33.4 million in service charges. District total expenses increased $18.6 million, or 10.6 percent primarily due to increases of $7.5 million in depreciation, $7.3 million in non-operating expense, and $3.8 million in operating expenses. The increase in depreciation is due to the recent completion of $141 .9 million in construction project assets that have entered their first year of depreciation. Operating expenses alone have increased only 3.7 percent over the prior year. Net assets increased $47.9 million, or 4.6 percent, to $1 ,089 million in FY 2005-06 over the prior year. Net capital assets increased $189.5 million, or 16.1 percent, due primarily to the continuing Capital Improvement Program that includes construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System. The Groundwater Replenishment System project continued to move forward with an estimated commissioning slated for Fall 2007. This joint project with the Orange County Water District will be the largest water reclamation project in the nation and divert up to 70 million gallons of water a day from the District's ocean discharge during peak winter storms. The District has budgeted $248.6 million for this project through FY 2007-08. Through FY 2005-06, $150.9 million had been incurred including an additional $83.7 million in outlays for FY 2005-06. Long-term liabilities increased $186.4 million, or 30.6 percent due to the issuance of $200 million in bonded debt to assist in the financing of the District's 10-year $2.4 billion Capital Improvement Program. I Looking Ahead In June 2006, the Board of Directors approved the District's FY 2006-07 operating and capital improvement budget at $545.1 million, or a 19.5 percent increase over the prior year. This overall increase is comprised of a $6.5 million, or 5.1 percent increase in the operating budget, an $1 1 . 1 million, or 20.3 percent increase in debt service requirements, and a $70.9 million, or 26.2 percent increase in cash outlays for construction projects. The increases in both debt service and CIP outlays is related to the completion of the District's $2.4 billion Capital Improvement Program including the Board's mandate to meet secondary treatment standards by December 31 , 2012. Increases in the operating budget consist of the following: ■ Salaries and Benefits, $4.8 Million - Costs will increase $1 .8 million as a result of existing collective bargaining agreement impacts, including health and welfare increases. The other significant impact is a $2.4 million, or 25 percent increase in retirement premiums. Our rising retirement premiums are consistent with increased costs throughout California. ■ Operating Materials and Supplies, $1 .4 Million - As the requirement for better quality effluent increases, so does the need for chemicals (primarily bleach) to treat the regions wastewater. These chemical increases reflect price increases of 34 percent partially offset by staff's optimization of treatment facilities. ■ Repairs & Maintenance, $2.2 Million - Various repairs at the OCSD operation plants, including diffuser replacement and digester cleaning, will increase the repairs and maintenance budget. ■Contractual Services, $2.9 Million - The major component of this category are biosolids removal and transportation costs. These costs continue to increase as acceptable locations for biosolids disposal become less accessible. ■ Utilities, $2.7 Million - Despite reductions by using natural gas, total utilities costs will increase due to rising electricity costs. OC:SU Makin; Everyday I'ossible ?I OCSD Board of Directors Fiscal Year 2005-06 Steve Anderson Don Bankhead Charles Antos Chair, Board of Directors City of Fullerton City of Seal Beach City of La Habra Bill Dalton David Shawver James M. Ferryman City of Garden Grove City of Stanton Vice Chair, Board of Directors Dave Sullivan Doug Davert Costa Mesa Sanitary District City of Huntington Beach City of Tustin Harry Sidhu City of Anaheim Sukhee Kong Rich Freschi City of Irvine City of Westminster Roy Moore City Brea Mark Waldman Michael Duvall City of Lo Palma City of Yorbo Linda Patsy Marshall Ken Parker Joy L. Neugebauer City of Buena Park City of Los Alamitos Midway City Sanitation District Phil Luebben Tod Ridgeway Darryl Miller City of Cypress City of Newport Beach Irvine Ranch Water District Larry Crandall City of Fountain Valley Carolyn Covecche James Silva City of Orange Orange County Norman Z. Eckenrode Board of Supervisors City of Placentia Alberta Christy City of Santa Ana 22 Moking 1:vcryday 1'ussih1(- cxal� � '"'`. Y District Officials James D. Ruth General Manager Dr. Robert P. Ghirelli Assistant General Manager Nicholas J. Arhontes Director of Operations and Maintenance James D. Herberg Director of Engineering Edward M. Torres Director of Technical Services Lorenzo Tyner Director of Finance and Administrative Services 6�JNSv SAW � � O V Na = 9 Q ¢ c� o -+ 9ol�cT/N� THE Orange County sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714) 962-241 1 www.ocsd.com aW`oJ,0 SANI) T Oy ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 9 : OT fCT �0 THE Date: February 21, 2007 Phone: To The Chair and Board of Directors [7141962-2411 Orange County Sanitation District fax: (714)962-0356 From: James D. Ruth www.acsd.com General Manaaer mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 Subject: Board Letter Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA OCSD Passes Grants Audit 92708-7018 As part of the requirements to receive Federal grants. OCSD was audited for $2.2 million we received during FY2005-06. Auditors reviewed a $705,000 Member grant from the Federal Emergency Management Agency for emergency repair Agencies i work to the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) line and a $1.5 million grant Cities from the Natural Resources Conservation Service for the ongoing SARI repair work. Anaheim Brea Buena Park This was the first audit associated with OCSD's Grants Program. We are Cypress leased to report that the auditor reported , a no findings, positive outcome for Fountain Valley p p P g Fullerton our first audit and a good indication of our grants management practices. Garden Grove Huntington Beach Irvine La Habra La Palma GIS Makes the Cover of a National Newsletter Los Alamitos We are pleased to inform you that OCSD's Enterprise Geographic Information Newport Beach Orange Systems (GIS) had an article published in the latest edition of Water Writes, a Placentia professional national newsletter showcasing GIS in the water and wastewater Santa Ana industry. The article describes the Information Technology-led led enterprise-wide Seal Beach 9Y- p Stanton deployment, training, growing understanding, and use of GIS arnong OCSD staff. Tustin Villa Park Yorba Linda GIS technology is used in every department at our agency. Programs GIS supports County of Orange include asset management; fats, oils, and grease; source control inspector assignments; point-source pollutant tracking; underground service alerts: hydraulic modeling: and ocean monitoring. Sanitary Districts Costa Mesa Midway City Construction Is Underway at Front Entrance of Plant 1 Water Districts Two construction projects are impacting the front entrance to Plant 1 adjacent to the Irvine Ranch Administration Building parking lot. The Ellis Avenue Trunk Sewer Replacement project is currently underway and is the first OCSD project ever to utilize trenchless technology. This technology was chosen due to the challenging constraints such as a street full of existing utilities and the injection wells along Ellis Avenue that protect our drinking water from seawater intrusion. This project will replace a 36-inch existing pipe with a 66-inch fiberglass reinforced pipe by using a tunnel-boring machine. To maintain world-class leadership in wastewater and water resource management. `oJNR,i SPNir, Dy U � 2 Board of Directors Page 2 February 21, 2007 The tunnel-boring machine will be submerged through a 40-ft deep shaft located by the front entrance. Throughout the 18-month project, the machine will move underground from Plant 1 approximately 6,000 feet on Ellis Avenue just west of Brookhurst Street. The second project is construction of the new Ellis Avenue Pump Station. This project replaces the a 1952 pump station located at the intersection of Ellis Avenue and Bushard Street. It will address capacity deficiencies, operational and maintenance requirements and ease the accessibility of the station. It is expected to break ground sometime in March and scheduled to be completed in Fall 2008. OCSD Participates in Global Warming and Greenhouse Gases Emissions Reduction Efforts There is substantial scientific evidence that global warming, due to Greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions, is real and is attributed to human activities. Impact on climate changes could result in the rise of ocean level, saltwater intrusion, decrease in hydropower, flooding and drainage of collection system, destruction of transportation infrastructure, and increase in stormwater flow due to heavy rains. Last year, the Governor signed the Global Warming Solution Act (known as AB 32) that requires the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to develop and implement control measures that would reduce emissions of GHG (Methane, Carbon Dioxide and others) to their 1990 levels by 2020. Implementation of these controls will begin in 2010. CARB is currently developing series of regulations that require facilities to prepare and submit their GHG emissions inventory by the end of this year. CARB is also identifying industries that will be required to meet early goals for GHG emissions reduction, working together with the Local Government, California Energy Commission (CEC) and California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). Staff, together with other wastewater treatment agencies, is actively participating in CARB working group activities in order to properly identify the control measures directed to our industry and reduce their economic impact to our agencies. OCSD has also joined the California Climate Registry organization to ensure that the 4J,,i SSN11,l/oN i 9 Board of Directors Page 3 February 21, 2007 methods developed for estimating GHG's from wastewater treatment plants are appropriate, and is currently organizing a statewide pooled program to inventory GHG emissions from our plants in the most cost-efficient way. OCSD to Host a Presentation on Sewer Lateral Ownership OCSD will host a seminar on Sewer Lateral Ownership on Thursday March 15. A flyer with complete information is attached for your review. Regulatory requirements on owning and operating public sewer systems have increased greatly since 2002. Focus is also now moving towards privately owned and operated systems. The lateral is the common name for the connecting pipe between a private building and the publicly owned sewer. It is usually located under the city street or paved alleyway. Performance problems with private systems contribute to sewer spills, blockages from roots, and extra flow into our system and treatment plants from damaged or illegally connected piping. A few cities in our area have taken responsibility for a portion of the lateral. This brief seminar will focus on their case studies. Most of the local area cities and sewering agencies are expected to attend this event. Contact Nick Arhontes at 714-593-7210 or narhontes(a-D.ocsd.com for more information. If you would like more information on any of the above items, please call me. James D. Ruth General Manager JDR:gg WDEPT\GMO\110\GM\BOARD LET7ER\2007\022107 BOARD LTR.DOC Attachments Another in a series of Sewer System Education Seminars hosted by the Orange County Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) Steering Committee PRESENTATION ON SEWER LATERAL OWNERSHIP HOSTED BY PATRICK McNELLY ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (714) 593-7163 pmcne11y@ocsd.com d 1y SA �r 1 o o � FpT'M�yy 7NE Subject: Should the property owner or the agency be responsible for maintenance and problems occurring in the portion of the sewer lateral located in the street? ➢ Hear from El Toro Water District (ETWD) and the cities of Fullerton, Santa Ana and Newport Beach who have assumed responsibility of sewer lateral operation, maintenance and repair ➢ What are the budgetary impacts and manpower requirements to maintain laterals? ➢ How will this affect local sewer rates? ➢ Is sewer lateral insurance available? ➢ Is the tree owner responsible for root problems? ➢ Potential Point of Sale legislation that requires televising and structural soundness of the sewer lateral prior to sale of property ➢ Questions and Answers Attendance by staff engineers, managers and elected officials is encouraged. Date. Time & Location: Thursday March 15, 2007, 9:30-11:30 A.M. OCSD Board Conference Room 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley 92708 Please arrive early as the program will begin at 9:30 A.M. 4 NATIONAL W ite I 2007ter wr s ESRI Winter In This Issue Enterprise GIS in Enterprise GIS in Wastewater Management p1 Wastewater Management Fitting the Pieces Together with GIS p2 Steve DeNtilde, GIS Coordinator,Orange Counh'.Sanitation Distr•ici GIS Improves Construction Management p6 The Orange Coup}y Sanitation District(OCSD) operates wastewater treatment plants in Fountain Never Too Small for Progress ps Valley and Huntington Beach.California.These plants receive residential and industrial/commer- ESRI Partner Corner p10 cial wastewater from approximately 2.5 million Impress Software Solutions,Inc. inhabitants and 579 permitted industrial sources / located within a 471-square-mile service area. Back-,round and Environment OCSD's mission is to collect,process,and recycle OCSD first began discussing geographic infor- or dispose of the treated wastewater while protect- mation systems back in the early 1990s. In fact, ing human health, preserving coastal resources, OCSD's electronic document management system and protecting air quality in accordance with ; (EDMS) recorded a piece of correspondence in federal,slate,and local laws and regulations.The the Engineering Department that recommended wastewater treatment plants receive and process bringing a system on board in 1991. The effort influent volumes averaging 250 million gallons began in 1997 with a budget line item for a GIS per day(MGD).Once treated,OC.SD discharges Orange County Sanitation District program of S4 million. In the late 1990s,discus- the effluent to the ocean through a submarine out- sions occurred and requirements were gathered to fall located in 200 feet of waterdepth and 4.5 miles (IT)Department.The program has grown and de- digitize"design and build"project documents,in- offshore of Huntington Beach. veloped into an organizational structure in which eluding construction drawings,into an EDMS. OCSD has implemented an enterprise geo- departmental users view, analyze, and maintain This effort was driven by the need to capture graphic information system(EGIS)program coor- GIS datasets in the effort to improve business pro- a soon-to-be-retired staff member's encyclopedic dinated from within the Information Technology cesses and decision making. knowledge of treatment plant facilities.The initia- tive became the first GIS-related project undertak- �D en,and it ambitiously integrated the new EDMS Focllity AUas with the new GIS.The systems deployed included (Zoomto Ftam)v (Additional Nwgabon Tools] ESRI's Arclnfo,ArcSDE,and ArcIMS.It utilized n O £3 ds o 0 19 U2 Autodesk Map to capture and attribute CAD fea- FsuuN Abas Larcrs tures and convert them to shapefiles,then Arclnfo ❑9 z ® s�,.- w 8 to load those shapefile features to ArcSDE. The Q O EDMS used FilcNET software to store and re- �� � trieve scanned images and native file formats.The intranet-based GIS applications accessing this information were called the(Plant)Facility Atlas and the(Engineering)Drawing Access System. i From 2001 to 2004. OCSD collection system i i ■ manholes,sewers.and related features were digi- tized.This was an asset-mapping effort,designed to spatially enable the computerized maintenance i i, management system (CMMS). In fact, many of Qthe data attribute fields came from the CMMS. o The data and tools delivered to OCSD were on the Plant and facility atlas eontinrred on urge 4 Fitting the Pieces Together with GIS You've Built Your GIS—Now What? Why Integrate? ow e.. rr•o 2— ao 11 .: w • a«+. �� -.v -- e�flt!O�m R 4tici%.tom+— SIP©Q 00310-:20 x If you are like most water/wastewater utilities, �" e ' �� •e+'� ` you've invested several years and many dollars ,�� a a designing and populating your GIS.Chances are you've probably even developed a viewing inter- face for your employees and perhaps your cus- tomers.Congratulations,you've accomplished an important first step!Now the fun begins:putting ry that data to good use.While in data maintenance mode,you have the luxury to step back and con- a°� -b sider how your GIS can add value to the tasks your organization currently performs and pos- sibly enable you to accomplish things you never y tr even imagined. i� �► • 4 The Boston Water and Sewer Commission V` ` « s (BWSC) developed its GIS between 1992 and �I d 2000, with the bulk of the data creation occur- ring in 1997 and 1998. tM.Ww xaanirtram -( "'.e �'""'' tw*At KW0 P • 1992—Feasibility Study Shutting down valves for the hydrant-flushing program • 1994—Pilot Study/Application Needs ment project and analyzing possible causes of work performed on that asset. In addition,when Assessment unaccounted-for water. Before GIS, BWSC de- a customercalls with a complaint,clerks can eas- • 1995—Acrial Photography partments gathered data for projects then stored ily search the area around the specified address • 1997—Data Model Design/Data it away,seldom reusing it or sharing it with other for similar work orders.A common GIS platform Conversion departments because there was no easy way to makes these analyses possible. • 1998—Release of the BWSC ArcView GIS do so. BWSC's GIS,along with its Oracle data- Plan Corrective Maintenance—BWSC staff Viewer bases,now provides a common platform for de- are able to use the link between work history and • 1999—Application Needs Assessment/ partments to share data, fitting together various GIS structures to diagnose problems and plan Application Strategies puzzle pieces of information and opening up new corrective maintenance. For example, the night • 2000—GIS WEB Viewer Development possibilities for improving operations. clerk who receives a complaint from a customer Since 2000,BWSC has used GIS to support its without water can use CASSView to highlight operations not only in traditional and anticipated Integration Examples closed valves in the area of the complaint. The ways, such as asset management and hydraulic Since 2000,in addition to providing access to GIS clerk may then right-click on any of those valves modeling, but also in creative and unexpected information via data viewers, BWSC has effec- to determine exactly who closed them and when. ways such as managing a citywide meter replace- tively utilized its GIS in a variety of projects that If they arc closed for a construction project,it is have helped serve customers more efficiently. quite possible that the customer is on bypass and WirelessAcdn swscw® Work Management—Work management is that something has gone wrong with the bypass Conswinphon to Dirtad Meter Readings ApplkatloDadansVs. Constr.. :t natural candidate for integration with GIS. pipe.Based on the information in the work order, py� Projects �ras M (Flnanoe) �_�t� In 2002. BWSC deployed RJN Group's CASS the clerk can arrange for immediate repair of the WORKS work order management software and bypass pipe. CASS WORKS t A1t1. GeoNortli s associated CASSView map-based Valve position information is also useful when Infrastructure aNfd6tf1CLure Feet work order viewing interface. When clerks ere- planning the hydrant flushing program. The and Basemap nt Marmertance Locatiom (opmiom ate service requests and work orders in CASS figure above illustrates an area where a hydrant ri»rrni (Comrti•t ar�w+d•) Iconvod•) E^W^»n w q g Y r WORKS,each record is geocoded to one or more flushing plan calls for shutting down valves 140 grAg MnnFl IN(_ AsIS locations based on either the associated water/ and 144. The supervisor planning the hydrant Monitor Meter `.Madei water a-nt sewer feature(s) or, if there are none as in the flushing reviews the closed valves in the area o Replacement _ a Sewer Flows Collection units case of a leak investigation,based on the problem and realizes that shutting valves 140 and 144 will tAamrwr+scnt tE„oa,.«.,,y� 8 P g (A3mnotr.ton) address. As a result,users can click on a struc- leave several streets without water. As a result, BWSC's big puzzle ture in CASSView and retrieve the history of all the supervisor reschedules the flushing to occur 2 water writes www.esri.com/water after the valves have been reopened. installation contractor worked systematically Roj�[S Soo Plan Preventive Maintenance—Using the same through the city,BWSC meter crews responding crc� technology,GIS helps BWSC plan its preventive to customer calls anywhere in the city replaced maintenance (PM) activities. For example, ev- the meter and installed the MTU while they had RgeC cl u cry catch basin has a cleaning interval assigned access to the building. In addition to preventing rA,n.,d. to it.The default is 30 months for standard catch repeated requests for access, this strategy pro- basins and 15 months for shallow catch basins. vided an unexpected benefit. By highlighting • ,�ap,m The PM manager has the ability to increase or buildings based on whether any DCUs were able reduce this interval for each structure based on to successfully pick up their transmitted reading 0 ck ical Operations • the observed amount of debris removed during signals,BWSC was able to identify areas of weakW W cleaning. BWSC's AreView viewing interface DCU coverage and adjust DCU positions early in Engi ring • E MIS! i 'I has a function that analyzes each catch basin in the project. Data a selected tile and highlights in red those due to MTU Installation—During the meter replace- namnlstrwon be cleaned.BWSC staff and contractors use these ment and MTU installation, it was sometimes ` • maps to determine which basins to clean and help unclear why MTU reading signals were not re- them plan an efficient route. ceived.BWSC's GIS provided the ability to the- team Himem Automated Meter Reading(AMR)—In 2004, matically map buildings by installation status and BWSC's project management model BWSC completed a program to replace all meters help determine the likely cause.Clusters of non- under two inches.In addition,fixed radio-based transmitting installations tended to indicate an Lead Replacement—During the AMR meter Meter Transmitter Units(MTUs)were installed area of weak DCU coverage as described above replacement project,BWSC had installers record on all meters,enabling BWSC to collect four me- and could often be resolved by moving or add- the service pipe material observed before the me- ter readings per day on each meter.GIS proved ing DCUs.Isolated nontransmitting installations ter.Based on this information,BWSC prioritized to be a useful tool in managing two different as- typically indicated poor MTU placement and customer outreach for its lead replacement pro- pects of this project. were most often resolved by adjusting the loca- gram to those ratepayers observed to have lead Data Collection Unit (DCU) Placement— tion of the MTU.In addition,BWSC was able to in the private portion of their water service. In DCUs are designed to receive signals from use its CASS WORKS work order management addition,having this information associated with MTUs transmitting within a one-mile radius. system in conjunction with its installation track- the customer account and having the accounts as- This design specification,however,is degraded if ing system to ensure that repairs and control- sociated with the building footprint in GIS enable hills or buildings impede the airway between an locates that could delay meter installations were BWSC to display the locations of lead services MTU and DCU.BWSC developed a map show- completed in a timely manner.BWSC completed on maps,which serves as a tool to monitor the ing the potential DCU locations(most on top of meter and MTU installation five months ahead progress of the lead replacement program. public schools)overlaid on 10-foot contour lines, of schedule,SI million under budget,and with a Unaccounted-for Water—All water utilities During the meter and MTU installation,as the greater than 99 percent success rate. strive to reduce their unaccounted-for water, and BWSC is no different.In several areas of the BESS city,it is possible to delineate on a map the exact area served by one or more Massachusetts Water AMR R'I'"' nao is Resources Authority(M W RA)meters. M W RA �� GIS is the wholesaler from whom BWSC purchases Meter Marte e macaws its water. Using these areas,it is possible to se- ReaA+gs 1�"'d° s,re.y: silents lect the buildings served by those meters and thus rrraatnrn.a determine the associated water billing accounts. Data BWSC is now able to compare measured water PeopleSoft validation CASS consumption (sales) to MWRA purchases; the difference indicates how much water is being n,a7K orae• work lost.To further refine the analysis,BWSC incor- Em � Construction -M ItM'rt'ry ' porates water use estimates for hydrant flushing, catetnctan PtlClgae street,I identified leaks, water main breaks, and con- Rgecta Ortbr cast u�tla, struction bypasses.The results help to determine Propcta Stteeta Irtrastruccue s„�, rrartoown.el. whether BWSC needs to boost its leak detection Effo yee efforts,examine more closely the accuracy of the BWSC's data is shared and maintained among various departments. continued on page U www.esri.com/water water writes 3 • ronrineed.fram page I portunities also were compiled,inventorying sani- data maintenance for OCSD assets, using CAD Enterprise GIS in tary and storm sewer data availability. design drawings and staff input as the source Wastewater Management Major recommendations included five priority for treatment plant and collection system asset projects,mainly involving GIS and external sys- updates. Engineering also provides cartographic Autodesk Map platform,using native and custom tem integrations; an organizational structure to services and updates the hydraulic model with features and functions to capture attributes and cre- support GIS; and a recommendation for current GIS data. Other departments provide and main- ate gridded map pages,both paper and electronic. and future technical infrastructure needs. lain geographically related data for sewer trouble In spring 2005, the first version of the OCSD spots,sanitary sewer overflows,odor- and spill- Sewer Geodatabase was completed. These fea- Enterprise GIS Organizational Structure complaint locations, sensitive receptors (senior ture classes and attributes were derived from the The EGIS group in IT provides program coor- centers and child care) for air quality,and other master CAD file delivered. GIS data rules were dination, database and application development data relevant to OCSD business. applied(feature geometry fidelity,similar or dif- services,and user training and support for OCSD This organizational structure has allowed for ferent class attributes or behaviors)to determine staff.Additional responsibilities include updating effective communication in a GIS context be- simple feature classes and an object table in the GIS base reference data from third parties such as tween departmental users. Maps,map documents new geodatabase. These classes were modeled the parcel land base,street centerlines, land use, (M XDs),and data can be shared between ArcView in Unified Modeling Language(UML)using the soils,and aerial orthophotos and creating geocod- users.Unnecessary work process bottlenecks,such ESRI sewer UML as a guideline. ing services based on parcel and street centerline as map requests that used to take days to complete, With a new sewer geodatabase implemented, datasets across application platforms. can now be addressed by trained and empowered reasonably up-to-date features were now served EGIS supports a variety of departmental GIS users able to view,query,and analyze GIS and re- via the intranet-based Online Sewer Atlas. This activities including lated data in ArcView or intranet map services. ArcIMS image service displayed collection sys- - Fats,oils,and grease monitoring tem features,basemap features,a custom geocod- - Flow-tracing analysis to determine pollut- Application and Database Framework ing index for searching addresses and intersec- ant sources and interagency monitoring Early in the strategic planning process,IT added tions,other basic GIS Web service functions,and responsibilities two experienced GIS professionals. In the subse- hyperlinks to scanned construction drawings and . DigSmart GIS for Underground Service quent two-plus years, OCSD has expanded GIS sewer atlas pages.The service also displayed low- Alerts(USAs) Web services,ArcGIS Desktop,and mobile GPS/ resolution aerial orthophotos stored in ArcSDE - Ocean and seafloor mapping and monitoring GIS usage. raster format for fast retrieval. - Air quality monitoring OCSD now has 22 ArcView users distrib- - Asset GIS feature data maintenance uted throughout six of its eight departments, 2004 Enterprise GIS Strategic Planning - Asset corrosion and risk analysis 2 ArcEditor users in the Engineering Department, Throughout 2004,OCSD and Psomas consultants - Collection system maintenance work and 3 Arclnfo users/data administrators in both interviewed 120 staff members,compiled the re- assignments IT and Engineering.ArcGIS Desktop users have sults into a needs assessment aggregated into rec- User departments, including Engineering, been trained through in-house staff,ESRI instruc- ommended applications and projects and delivered Operations, and Technical Services, view, tors on-site,and Introduction to ArcGIS training a document that has proven useful in guiding cur- analyze, map, and often maintain GIS data. manuals.Tutorial data is posted to a network file rent and future efforts.Regional data-sharing op- Engineering provides GIS feature and attribute server. Enterprise GIS intranet pages communi- cate program objectives and activities, training ek a„s.„�.,� ,. t,,0146..ne opportunities, and available data. These staff o r317 d, - • * +s< - :e &.O o k? members have increased the level of GIS expertise +, A ..--.I► ' ' sk '4'_:� :: ::n 0♦ cP R O M-o ' w in each department. ,r„st -, '•J re.• y,y,,.. r - .. ArcPad has been used on three Trimble GeoXT (soon upgrading to the GeoXH model) mobile °per GPS units in the collection systems maintenance group for the past two years,first supporting the USA program in marking buried assets for exca- vation protection utilizing Bergmann Associates' DigSmart extension to ArcView.Later,it became a tool for capturing asset location and attribute / discrepancies in the GIS data. The Technical Services Department is also experimenting with } mobile GIS for tracking monitoring locations and field attribute capture. The intranet community of users includes ap- proximately 200 staff members who can view collection systems,plant facilities,and quick and _ easy locator map information.The ArcIMS map • •J ' /�U�. I J services are used for locating assets,viewing bar- srs ,,,:;oN,,,<FK; riers and providing a locator map to maintenance Network trace at OCSD 4 water writes www.esri.com/water activities, locating chemical treatment sites, and - - much more. The priority system integration projects identified in the 2004 Strategic Plan were GIS- Computerized Maintenance Management System v / (CMMS), GIS-Complaints, and GIS-Permits. / An essential interface was deployed in summer ° 2006 that integrates sewer connection permits with geography. The application allows public \ \ counter staff'to create,store,retrieve, print,and 1 geographically view permits granted to residents, developers,and public agencies.The interface is \ / built as an ArcView custom extension by the EGIS programmer with several years'experience using ° ArcObjects.This effort will provide quality data \ ° for future permit integrations. GIS data is managed from three environments \mil as well. At the top level, the ArcSDE/Oracle RDBMS contains enterprise-wide GIS data,cen- ° trally managed by an enterprise administrator and one departmental administrator. Feature meta- ®� 0 0-10 10-220 M-30 30-40 60-50 M-130 data is available on the EGIS intranet pages and 0 03 i 2 n s in ArcCatalog. Many of these datasets are served to intranet GIS users via ArcIMS map services. Chromium spline All datasets are accessible to the ArcGIS Desktop representing pipe age, material, and soil wastewater management. user community. characteristics The OCSD is on its way to completing this foun- The second tier of enterprise-managed data is • Assigned maintenance activities by perform- dation. The sewer geodatabase and high-quality file based and network server shared.These da- ing attribute queries on pipes within a diam- orthophotos are in place.OCSD acquired the GIS tasets have metadata tracked within a Microsoft eter range and in a particular drainage area Web services development tool in summer 2006. Access database.Typical data found here includes • Determined interagency monitoring respon- EGIS staff will then work with user departments shapefiles and other GIS or CAD files used for sibilities for point-source dischargers with to integrate the CMMS with GIS,displaying map map production including shoreline buffers for network tracing asset features within the browser, linkable to cartographic enhancement, other agency asset • Linked CCTV observations to sewer line maintenance work orders,histories,and perhaps data, or reference data beyond OCSD jurisdic- features sewer line inspection videos.OCSD hopes to ac- tion(e.g.,shapefiles of roads or highways for all • Geocoded child and senior care centers from quire the parcel land base later this year as well. of California). This file-based repository allows Health Department data and overlaid these As other GIS and external datasets become for GIS data sharing between desktop users with- on an air quality surface model created with available and stable,additional Web services will out incurring the overhead required for AreSDE the Spatial Analyst extension be created.These will link odor,spill,and prop- administration. • Created seafloor sediment pollutant con- erty damage complaints; county assessor data; The final managed GIS data tier is work-in- centration maps using the point-to-raster permit data;and lab results to geography. progress data used for a mapping or analysis interpolation functionality within Spatial Coordinating enterprise GIS efforts from IT project that may not have wide use or application Analyst allows a comprehensive,agency-wide view,con- outside the immediate project.These datasets are sidering system integration needs and opportuni- usually on a local hard drive and not shared with Summary ties from both end user and system administration other users.Any metadata tracking is solely at the Key to the OCSD enterprise GIS program is perspectives. Ideally, an agency following this discretion of the data creator. the integration of external data systems, which model will find skill sets that blend extensive GIS maximize opportunities to visualize informa- experience with understanding of IT principles Success Stories tion. These links are extremely beneficial to cl, and practices to design, implement,and support The ultimate success of an enterprise GIS de- fective decision making. Foundational elements, a framework of operation.Effective GIS manage- pends on its users.In this regard,selective deploy- both data and application development tools,have ment is achieved through an awareness of staff, ment of ArcView Desktop has paid off very well priority in managing and implementing enterprise political,budgetary,and technology opportunities for OCSD. Staff receiving ArcView was chosen GIS.The strategic focus of the EGIS staff has been and challenges. The Orange County Sanitation based on business need and personal interest,with to acquire and implement the sewer geodatabase, District has been successful in its enterprise GIS particular attention given to divisions with related Orange County's parcel land base, high-quality implementation to date and will reap even more data to apply to geography. Six of OCSD's eight aerial orthophotos,and a GIS Web services soft- benefits in the future. departments now have ArcView users. ware development tool. These four cornerstones With training and support,these users have allow for effective, efficient, and far-reaching • Performed asset risk analysis by spatially deployments of location-based information fir www.esri.com/water water writes 5 GIS Improves Construction Management sion. The Erie County Water Authority was technologically advanced society, daily field WENOEL OUCHSCHERER also contracted for lease management services activities and record-drawing information are to provide operation and maintenance services still recorded manually and delivered weeks The Town of Newstead is located in the north- for the water system infrastructure.The most or months later. This lack of communication eastern corner of Erie County in western New recent,and most extensive,expansion was for and data sharing has a direct impact on claims, York. It is a rural community with more than Water District No. 10. This water district in- public relations,and project cost containment. 40 percent of the area devoted to agriculture. eludes approximately 60 percent of the land To lessen these problems and inefficiencies, This agriculture characteristic is the town's area of the town. Due to the size of the wa- a streamlined and efficient solution was de- basic heritage dating back to its founding in ter district and the cost of providing water to veloped for getting the knowledge of the field 1823.During the past few decades,the Town of these residents, a phased approach was taken crew into the hands of Wendel Duchscherer en- Newstead has struggled with its identity. It is for the installation of the water infrastructure. gineers and Town of Newstead staff within the striving to provide services to its residents and Phase I is currently ongoing and includes the same day. grow at a controlled rate while maintaining its construction of 28 miles of waterline along the All documentation is now controlled rural character.A decade ago,the Town Board most populous roads within the water district. through a geographically driven interface us- took several measures to help guide Newstead's Phase 2,an additional 9 miles of waterline, is ing ESRI MapObjccts software alongside future.It developed its first Town Master Plan, in the planning stage with an estimated con- Primavera Expedition, a Web-enabled project bought vacant land through grant money for fu- struction start date of summer 2006.The com- management software. By taking advantage ture public use,started to expand water service plexities of managing such a large construction of advances in technology and engineering, to additional areas,and purchased the rights to project in many different areas of the town has the field inspector's reports and sketches were various abandoned railroads in the town. led Wendel Duchscherer to evolve common turned into electronic forms to be filled out and The desire to provide a safe and depend- construction management practices and look stored on Tablet PCs.To ensure a smooth tran- able water supply to existing and future town to new technologies and the ideals of GIS to sition from paper to digital form and minimize residents has led to the creation of 10 water improve its communication and data-sharing training for field inspectors, the standard hy- districts.Newstead sought the help of its town capabilities. drant and water service inspection paper forms engineer, Wendel Duchscherer Architects & A construction project is replete with prob- were re-created via database inputed forms to Engineers, in the improvement of the exist- lems that occur when poor and inefficient com- provide easy,organized access to all collected ing water system and the installation of new munication exists between owners,engineers, information. Each form,sketch,or document- infrastructure needed to facilitate this expan- contractors, and the public. Even in today's ed progress photo was inputted through a cus- tomized MapObjects application combining __ rti A * "`�••' °"' Newstead basemap information with CAD de- ~"""• 1 sign plans of the water project.Documentation input of all inspected features is initiated by _M ❑ clicking on the desired location in the created map window.Other information,such as daily field reports,material installed by the contrac- tor, and correspondence, is recorded through Expedition. To fully utilize and combine the capabilities of each application,a migration of •• I � ti I the existing program to ArcObjects for a scam- less integration with Expedition is currently - _ being designed. This blend of technology,engineering,man- - _ -_ & (`p`� agement practices, and GIS concepts simpli- I r —5-.sr. a `�--— `1 �.� fied the transfer and reduced unneeded dupli- cation of information between all parties by 17 organizing the data through linked points on s �, ,�• - ,,,r r- the design plans and providing wireless data Construction management tool showing documentation and viewing of design changes and pre/postconstruction transfer from the field.Each involved party,in- photos during installation of waterline in Newstead eluding the Town of Newstead supervisor and 6 water writes www.esri.com/water Trade Shows Massachusetts Municipal Association u Boston,Massachusetts January 12-13,2007 / r T r AWWA IMTech Austin,Texas March 4-7,2007 GITA San Antonio,Texas March 4-7,2007 Aquatech USA Orlando,Florida March 28-30 ASFPM Norfolk,Virginia FF June 3-8 J— 2007 ESRI International User Conference San Diego,California June 18-22,2007 r..r r.�r.w .�,rrr.� ...r- •.B �J � AWWA ACE r—a Toronto,Canada June 23-26 Construction management tool utilized by town staff,project managers,and field inspectors for filling out and creating reports of service connections during construction Team Water/Wastewater would like to Highway Department superintendent, Wendel town residents.The end result has shown that, thank our 2006 User Conference Sponsors: Duchscherer construction managers and en- with enhanced communications and data- Advanced Infrastructure Management gineers, as well as each construction field in- sharing capabilities, the Town of Newstead ARCADIS G&M,Inc. Avineon,Inc. Spector,is provided with the same MapObjects and Wendel Duchscherer were able to reduce Azteca Systems,Inc. Bergmann Associates interface for tracking construction progress claims,provide better public relations,and im- Black&Veatch Corporation and viewing the documented in-field design prove overall project cost containment. Camp,Dresser&McKee(CDM) CarteGraph Systems and construction issues. This allowed Wendel The authors would like to thank the Newstead CEDRA Corporation CH2M HILL Duchscherer's construction managers and town Town Board for making the development and use Datastream Systems DCSE,Inc. staff to understand construction issues and of this solution a success. For additional infor- DHI Water&Environment progress much more easily as well as improve mation, contact Wendel Duchscherer's project EH Wachs Utility Services EMA,Inc. communication between staff and concerned manager, Daniel Seider(ciseider(a wd-ae.com), GBA Master Series,Inc. Geographic Information Services residents. or GIS manager, Nathan Carter (ncarter@ GeoNorth HDR The project has delivered a more connected wd-ae.com),at 716-688-0766. ICOMMM project team; town staff; and most important, Impress Software iWater,Inc. Malcolm Pirnie Marshall GIS&Remote Sensing Solutions Merrick&Company Metric Engineering,Inc. Michael Baker Jr.,Inc. "The user group puts me in contact with other Moose M RO Technology,Inc. RO Software GIS professionals throughout the country.The MWH Soft Nobel Systems benefit of sharing the experiences with other PBS&1 TER INNATI WAT PennWell Corporation users allows us to enhance our practices and PipeLogix also learn what not to do.In addition,I now RBF ConsultingRouteSmart Technologies,Inc. have an appreciation for the sport of curling." SAP America,Inc. Spacient Technologies,Inc. Timmons Group David Ra enber UAI _ ./.�` g Wallingford Software,Inc. btformation Technology Assistant Manager Watershed Concepts Westin Engineering,Inc. Greater Cincinnati{Pater Works,Ohio Weston Solutions,Inc. Woolpert XP Software,Inc. www.esri corn/water water writes 7 Water/Wastewater Never Too Small for Progress User Group Committees Br Bob,tlilclre!!. Uir•rctur•,Inlet Beach {Du2r.Snnni National Beth Degironimo,Chairman,Mohawk Michell Carley, GISP, GIS Coordinator,Mei-ic Engineering.Inc. Valley Water Authority,NY James Bates,Louisville Water Company,KY Overview However,budget contraints limited its ability Marc Brown,Orange County Sanitation g y District,CA Inlet Beach is a small,unincorporated coastal to hire trained personnel and purchase all the Kathryn Browning,Municipality of Anchorage,AK community located in the Florida Panhandle hardware and software they would need to col- Jon Henderson,City of Bozeman,MT Kent Lage,Johnson County,KS between Panama City and Destin, Florida. lect data and relocate features accurately. Joe McEachern,Boston Water and Sewer This 500-acre community located on the crys- In 2005, IBWS director Bob Mitchell met Board,MA Jim Moening,City of Columbus,OH tal white beaches of the Gulf Coast is the home Martin Copping, GIS solutions manager Phil Oswalt,Montgomery Water Works and of approximately 900 residents. for Metric Engineering, Inc., at the annual Sanitary Sewer Board,AL Barbara Quinn,Cincinnati Area GIS,OH Inlet Beach Water System (IBWS) is a Alabama/Florida Rural Water Association Deborah Viera,Dade Water and Sewer Department,Miami,FL consumer-owned nonprofit utility company, conference and expressed his vision of creat- Partner Council As late as 1986, IBWS was a 200-connection ing a more efficient way to manage the utility Bryan Dickerson,Woolpert system with a two-year waiting list for a water system,convert all of his company's engineer- Dave Disera,EMA GaryGraybill,Advantica meter. By 2003, IBWS had grown to 400 wa- ing data into a digital format, and be able to Brian Haslam,Azteca ter meters and faced the challenge of adding a share this digital data with his staff and other Alan Hooper,CDM Steve Line,ICOMMM sewer system to accommodate the demands of agencies in the county. This vision became a Bo Nielsen,DHI Michael Samuel,Nobel Systems developers. In the last three years, IBWS has realistic and attainable goal through the de- Cliff Tompkins,Westin Engineering grown to 940 connections with sewer service velopment of a custom ArcPad application for International available to every customer. field data collection and the implementation of Jim Carlson-Jones,Chairman,South Prior to the development of a GIS database Metric Engineering s GISLite"Solution. Australia Water Company p g g Adam Chadwick,City of Kamloops,BC, for the community of Inlet Beach, utility in- Canada Krystyna Jastal,Boytom Communal formation was maintained on traditional paper Database Design and Implementation Enterprise Ltd,Poland Patrick Vercruyssen,PIDPA,Antwerpen, and Mylar maps. Some of these maps were Before any fieldwork began, the Metric ys Belgium 20 years old and were hand drawn over county Engineering GIS Solutions team met with the Curran Weilbacher,Pohnpei Utilities Corp., Federated States of Micronesia tax maps.The maps detailed most assets with IBWS staff and completed a user needs assess- Arizona a reasonable degree of accuracy,but they were ment. Utilizing ESRI's Water Utilities Data Terry Dorschied,Chairman,Water Services becoming increasingly difficult to manage Department,City of Phoenix Vincent Boccied,Salt River Project due to the rapid growth of the community and Robert Czaja,Tucson Water the need to continuously update feature loca- David Hatchner,City of Flagstaff Mark Ledbetter,City of Scottsdale tions. In 2001, IBWS attempted to inventory Dianne Lynas,Arizona Department of Water Resources the system features by their GPS coordinates. Dave Varela,City of Chandler California Mike Hoolihan,Chairman,Irvine Ranch Water District Mike Brown,Las Virgenes Municipal Water District Albert Lin,Long Beach Water Department Nathan Look,LADWP James 011erton,Elsinore Valley Municipal d �a Water District Nadeem Shaukat,City and County of San ' - Francisco i Fred Wong,Union Sanitary District California Partner Council Raymond Brown,LSA Associates Inc. �_w s*"' ►. Ali Diba,DCSE _ Yazdan Emrani,Advanced Infrastructure t Management,Inc. x- r Erick Heath,MWH Soft Don Rhodes,iWater,Inc. Chris Stern,Spacient Technologies,Inc. Northeast ;: Barbara MacFarland,Chairman,The Metropolitan District(MDC),CT - Field data collection by Inlet Beach staff 8 water writes www.esri.com/water Model as the foundation,the GIS Solutions team modified this data model to meet IBWS require- Jeff Amero,City of Cambridge,MA Gilbert Osei-Kwadwo,Fairfax County ments and incorporated it into the geodatabase. Wastewater Management,VA Nancy Pullen,Boston Water and Sewer,MA After the data model was created, the pro- Sigi Sharp,Washington Suburban Sanitary cess of locating every hydrant, valve, meter, ea. District,DC Dave Ward,Loudoun County,VA manhole,and pump station began.The collect- Northeast Partner Council ed data was verified and the GPS coordinates Jim Schoenberg,Bergmann Associates,NY were recorded. This was accomplished by us- Mid-America ing a customized ESRI ArcPad application on Becky McKinley,Chairman,Hammond a Trimble Reeon handheld PC with a Trimble Sanitary District,IN Will Allender,Colorado Springs Utilities,CO Pathfinder' ProXH" GPS. The ArcPad appli- ter decisions. Further,the water company ill Bruce Butler,Butler County, P Y w R Jeffrey Duke,Northeast Ohio Regional cation was customized using ESRI's ArcPad now be able to maintain a more accurate ac- Sewer District,OH Judy Holtvogt,Montgomery County,OH Application Builder and VBScript,so that the count of its assets, save time searching for in- David Kreneck,City of Fountain,CO data could be checked in and checked out of ventor information,and share GIS data with- David WorkRafs, O berg,Greater Cincinnati Water Y Works,OH the geodatabase,seamlessly imported into the in the department and with the county through Ed Weaver,Tarrant Regional Water District, GIS,and then shared through GISLite.GISLite a user-friendly Web interface 24 hours a day, TX is a hosted solution that is built on ESRI's 7 days a week. "We can solve our real-world, Mid-America Partner Council Y� Jerry Mohnhaupt,Destiny Resources,Inc., ArcGIS Server technology. It provides IBWS everyday problems,like knowing which valves CO Sasa Tomic,Wallingford Software,TX users with Web-based access to the utilities to shut off during a main break and who will Nicole Schmidt,GBA Master Series,MO data without necessitating a large investment be affected.No more need for looking through Tim Sheehan,EH Wachs Company,IL in hardware, software, and personnel—thus paper drawings and plans at the office;' said Pacific Northwest working within their budget constraints. Mitchell. CIarence Portla dlbrick tWa r ChairDeparrttme t,tORf The water and sewer distribution system is While the GIS program moves forward,the Dale Bertelson,Clean Water Services,OR Pete Brandstetter,City of Albany,OR of interest to many departments.By posting the community of Inlet Beach continues to make Nora Curtis,Clean Water Services,OR collected data at regular intervals to the GISLite Ian Von Essen,Spokane County,WA g progress with the field data collection and Web site, any IBWS staff member, decision enhancements to the GIS. Mitchell continued, Pacific Northwest Partner Council Elizabeth Marshall,Marshall,WA maker,and municipal staff with a Web browser "The ability to use GIS as a tool to help meet can access the data for each structure of the wa- our needs is now more than just a vision;it is a Southeast J lames Carter,Chairman,Metro Water ter distribution system whether at the office,at part of Inlet Beach's daily business.' Services,TN home,or in the field 24/7.GISLite also enables Ron Hawkins,Orlando Utilities Commission, FL IBWS staff to perform analysis and produce re- Contacts for information Steve McKinney,Storm Water Management Authority,Inc.,AL ports. Since the project has begun, more than Bob Mitchell,Director,I BWS Lesley Roddam,Walt Disney World Corporation,RCES,FL 1,500 features have been field verified. 850-231-4498 and ibwsCearthlink.net Joel Watson,Spartanburg Water System,SC Victoria Wing,Columbia County,GA or Conclusion Martin Copping, GIS Solutions Manager, Southeast Partner Council Dale Dunham,Geographic Information IBWS has seen immediate benefits from im- Metric Engineering,Inc. Services,AL plementing GISLite;these include elimination 786-251-2356 and mcopping(rbm Michaeel Gilloughlbrook,HDRDR,etriceng.com Micha C , S,SC F FLL of duplicate drawings, easier reproduction of Andy Moore,CH2M HILL maps, and use of real-time data to make bet- Mark NFL on,lones Edmunds&Associates, AWWA Liaison Ed Baruth,American Water Works Association,CO Team Water/Wastewater would like to congratulate WEF Liaison City of Portland, Oregon, Water Bureau; Orange Nan Tucker,Water Environment Federation, VA County Sanitation District, California; Acquedotto • Pugliese SpA, Italy; and Servicio de Agua Potable • y Alcantarillado de Lima, Peru, for the Special Achievement in GIS awards they received at the 2006 ESRI International User Conference. kkkd www.esri com/water water writes 9 ESRI Partner Corner Impress Software Solutions, Inc. Impress Software Solutions,Inc.'s Impress for GIS better decisions,accelerate repair time,and can be rendered on the map and color-coded is a packaged integration application that allows improve asset performance. for spatial analysis and at-a-glance viewing the efficient and cost-effective integration of SAP Enhance business analytics by enabling spa- to improve decision making. and ESRI ArcGIS to streamline EAM processes. tial analysis of SAP information to strength- For water utilities and other organizations that en decision making and improve resource History of the Impress for GIS Product rely heavily on IT to manage a set of geographi- planning. Impress for GIS was created in response to grow- cally dispersed assets,Impress for GIS is a solu- Lower total cost of ownership by accelerat- ing demand by ESRI customers for a reliable lion specifically optimized for bridging SAP with ing implementations,lowering maintenance and cost-effective integration solution. Marin ESRI's ArcGIS.It automatically links SAP assets costs,and using a solution fully supported Municipal Water District in California's Bay with GIS features and keeps the asset information by Impress software. Area, for example,is a veteran GIS user that has in sync with other systems,dramatically reducing Impress for GIS is organized into two applica- relied on systems from ESRI for more than a de- data administration costs. Leveraging Impress Lion modules: cade. During its GIS implementation, the water for GIS,service organizations can easily access The Asset Data Management module au- district built a custom integration between its and manipulate SAP asset information and work tomatically synchronizes asset-related in- mapping system from ESRI and SAP.The district management processes directly from the Familiar formation between SAP and GIS to ensure invested more than a year of work and consider- confines of the GIS. both systems remain up-to-date and accu- able resources building this custom interface,but An ArcGIS/SAP integration is a complex one, rate. It also allows GIS users to access and after the initial rollout,each change or addition often requiring the bidirectional transfer of asset manipulate SAP data including asset cre- to either the SAP or ESRI system required a cus- data as well as the need to continuously link asset ation,modification,and deletion.GIS users tom project involving both contractors and the data in both real time and batch transfers.Impress can view asset information,previously only district's IT department to maintain the integra- for GIS is designed to address these requirements accessible from SAP,from the map to facili- tion.The ongoing support and maintenance of the and can be implemented in a fraction of the time late the diagnosis and repair process. interface proved to be costly and time consuming, a custom integration requires while providing the The Maintenance and Operations module en- prompting the water district to seek a commer- peace of mind ofa certified and supported solution, ables access to SAP work management data cially available solution.At the recommendation Impress for GIS enables ArcGIS customers to and processes from the GIS. GIS users can of ESRI,the district chose to work with Impress • Increase workforce productivity by stream- create work orders and notifications,update Software. Through working with Impress, the lining processes and providing easy access status information,and assign orders and no- water district found that a packaged solution to to key SAP information and processes from tifications to features on the map.In addition, a critical problem required fewer resources(peo- the map. they can analyze SAP work order inf'orma- ple,time,and money)and was robust enough to • Improve customer service by arming field tion with a point-and-click search using mul- fully address its integration requirements. service organizations with insight to make tiple user-defined criteria. This information For more information about integrating SAP and ArcGIS,contact Q_• .�.K gprrR� Y► CYHi °it- - 4w x.n Impress Software Solutions,Inc. ...• i• - � -. � e c 460 Totten Pond Road,Suite 200 Waltham,MA 02451 .42;1.;:m Phone:781-419-5600 1a,..., ,4t,.,r, e •-- ;; � " Fax:781-419-5666 e ...... z w•: h .m Mtb.Nrc. • >• „� id P raft�+s xa•x /t _ . .�:J Y.-��.1__ 1 1 1-I ®tyV,,:Iwl � - /{ , / --` :.✓fir�� _tam tLx t•.m:ax - — an-xm 1 "°' ' '�" +�' '• Spatially analyze work order statistics. Synchronize SAP assets and GIS features. 10 water writes www,esri.com/water Fitting the Pieces Together with GIS aged by GIS staff..All street names have a unique rouuinued/iam page J code,and all references to street names are vali- dated and stored using the street code. This ar- wholesale meters,or perhaps close a bypass pipe rangement ensures that the data is well controlled that may have been left open. and guarantees that street name changes made in Identification of Missing Accounts—To per- the master table are reflected in all other tables G "' 'oc�J form many of the analyses listed above, it was and applications since only the code is stored. / 367 e3 necessary to establish a link between the build- Similarly,all employee names are defined once ings on the map and the account numbers that in a PeopleSoft database maintained by Human �o uniquely identify consumption,billing,and ser- Resources.All references in othertables to BWSC Arcview interface that analyzes each catch basin and vice material. While performing the research employees are stored by their unique employee highlights those due to be cleaned necessary to establish acute building to account ID.The figure on page 3 (lower left) illustrates holding departments without generating resent- links, BWSC identified several locations where data that is shared among various departments ment among those departments. water was being used but no account had been and highlights which department is responsible Active Participation The final key to integra- established.This allowed BWSC to establish the for maintaining that data. tion success is active participation.BWSC's proj- appropriate accounts and begin collecting rev- Effective Organizational Structure—Any ect management model requires active participa- enue for that consumption. project must have sufficient resources to be suc- tion from all affected groups from field personnel cessful. These resources may take the form of to office personnel,from clerks to management. How Did BWSC Do It? institutional knowledge, hardware, software, If a group's workflow will be affected by a project These are just a few examples of how GIS has consulting expertise, and/or dedicated project or if its institutional knowledge is needed,then helped BWSC integrate data and applications management.Therefore,it is critical that the peo- a representative of that group must participate in to benefit the organization. With access to more ple in the organization who have the authority to the project team. accurate and current data, BWSC has improved control resources be involved in the project and Employees who participate on project teams overall communication between departments have a thorough, up-front understanding of the are more likely to make the best use of the result- and across the commission.These successes can project costs and benefits.This is especially ef- ing applications and share their enthusiasm with be attributed to three key factors: reliable stan- fective when it is possible to show a clear connec- theircoworkers.Employees who see their sugges- dards,effective organizational structure,and ac- tion between the project's success and some vis- tions implemented in applications are more likely tive participation. ible measurement such as cost savings because of to generate ideas for new uses of data and par- Reliable Standards They're not glamorous, elimination of duplicate work orders,reduction in ticipate in their development.A review of BWSC and if used correctly, most people don't even customer calls due to a well-designed Web page, project teams would illustrate a broad diversity of realize they exist, but standards are critical for or decrease in unaccounted-for water. In addi- participating members from line staff to execu- integrating data across an organization. When tion,these decision makers must be kept apprised tive management and spanning all departments. BWSC rolled out its GIS,a review of commis- of the project's status including any changes to Although it takes time,reliable standards,ef- sion databases would have shown different street the anticipated schedule and budget and the rea- fective organizational structure,and active par- lookup tables for various databases in different sons for those changes.Before BWSC begins any ticipation can result in an exciting upward spiral, departments.GIS used one set of street names and project,it must be endorsed by the executive di- allowing organizations to capitalize on their in- abbreviations,the billing database used another, rector and chief operating officer as well as any vestment in data: Project participants who see and several small Access databases used no street relevant department heads. It must also receive their suggestions reflected in successful applica- name validation at all.Similarly,some databases the approval of BWSC's three-member Board of tions are more likely to make use of those appli- referred to employees by first name then last Commissioners. In approving the project with a cations.Staff who utilize applications to perform name,others by initials,and others by last name thorough understanding of the costs and benefits, their jobs more easily and effectively generate then first name.Without data standards, BWSC BWSC's decision makers commit to providing widespread interest and use throughout the or- found it impossible to answer questions such as the resources necessary to complete the project ganization. Widespread use of integrated data "Tell me all the work we've ever done at a partic- successfully. and applications by people performing diverse ular address"or"Tell me all the work completed BWSC has also found that data integration jobs generates discussion and ideas for new uses by a specific employee"because the information projects spanning departments must be assigned of data.New ideas are implemented with active was recorded in so many different ways. to a project manager that is not a member of any participation from stakeholders—continuing the Since that time, BWSC has identified which of those departments.The commission's organi- upward spiral. Organizations and their employ- data to standardize and which departments are zational structure has project managers reporting ees and customers all reap the benefits. the"designated owners"responsible for the data directly to the chief operating officer,making it maintenance. Street name information is man- possible to coordinate resources from all stake- www.esri corn/water water writes 11 Water Writes is a publication of Advertisers can contact ads@esri.com. the Water/Wastewater Group of ESRI. To subscribe to ESRI publications,visit www.esri.com/subscribe. To unsubscribe from ESRI publications,visit www.esri.com/unsubscribe To contact the ESRI Desktop Order Center, Requests for back issues,missed issues,and other circulation services may also be sent via call requests@esri.com;909-793-2853,extension 1.2778,or faxed to 909-307-3051. 1-800-447-9778 To update your mailing address,visit www.esri.com/coa or use any e-mail,phone,or fax option. within the United States or If you are from outside the United States,please contact your international distributor to subscribe, 909-793-2853,ext. 1-1235, unsubscribe,or change your address.For a directory of distributors,visit www.esri.com/distributors. outside the United States. Send inquiries to Lori Armstrong,Water Resources Visit the ESRI Web site at www.esri.com Industry Solutions Manager larmstrong@esri.com See Water Writes online at www.esri.com/waterwrites. Copyright C 2006 ESRI.All rights reserved.ESRI,the ESRI globe logo.ArcGIS.ArcView,Arcinfo,ArcEditor,MOMS. AreMap,Arc Catalog,hlxpObjecls,SDE,AreSDE.ArcOhjccts,Arcpad.,a.esri.com,and www.esri.com are trademarks, 105294 registered trademarks,or sen ice marks of ESRI in the United States.the European Community,or certain other jurisdictions. 43 3MR/06sp Other companies and products mentioned herein arc trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective trademark owners. -smaupsaAw/ulo:)'Ijsa-mmm le ttepol do u61S Taje jnoF w sluana pue sjasn sI9 yllm paljauuo:)not sdaa4 smaN IHS3 4W IHS3 OM-ELEM VD 'spuelpaa PledlaailS AJO),MDN 08E @belsOd.5.n 18S3 piepuelS pallosajd AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING February 28, 2007 — 7:00 P.M. 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance (Fountain Valley — Director Larry Crandall) 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director Brea Roy Moore Ron Garcia Fountain Valley Larry Crandall Gus Ayer Fullerton Don Bankhead Sharon Quirk Orange Jon Dumitru Carolyn Cavecche Stanton David Shawver David Cadena 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 5. Public Comments 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair: consideration of Resolutions or recommendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 01/15/07 01/31/07 Totals $14,340,963.00 $26,234,070.42 02/28/07 Page 2 DIRECTORS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than $250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving OCSD. This requires that you identify the contributor by name. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with OCSD. For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308, please see your Director's Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. CONSENT CALENDAR 8. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. Order the minutes for the regular meeting held on January 24, 2007, to be filed and deemed approved, as mailed. b. (1) Authorize staff to annex 152.30 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the vicinity of Newport Boulevard, Rangeview Drive and Cowan Heights Drive, in an unincorporated area of Orange County: (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 07-02, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-61 — Cowan Heights Annexation): and, (3) Defer collection of associated fees for proposed Annexation No. OCSD-61 — Cowan Heights Annexation until a sewer connection is permitted. C. (1) Consider and Approve an Addendum to the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for the 1999 Strategic Plan to comply with the Court of Appeal's holding in County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County v. County of Kern (2005); (2) Consider and Approve an Addendum to the 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR in conjunction with the Board's consideration and final approval of an "Agreement for the Management of Biosolids" with EnerTech Environmental California, LLC to manage biosolids at their facility in Rialto, California and an "Amendment No. 8 to an Agreement" with Synagro to manage biosolids at their facility at the South Kern County Industrial Center (°SKIC"); and, (3) Final Approval of the EnerTech Contract and Synagro Contract, the CEQA contingencies having been satisfied. 02/28/07 Page 3 d. Adopt the following resolutions to change the name of the Engineering & Operations Committee to Operations Committee, and Finance & Administration Committee to Administration Committee: (1) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD07-03, Establishing Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Business of the District, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 06-25; and, (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD07-04, Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Award of Purchase Orders and Contracts; Public Works Project Contracts; Professional Services Contracts; and Delegation of Authority to Implement Said Policies and Procedures; and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 06-28. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR e. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 9. STEERING COMMITTEE Consent Calendar a. Order draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 24, 2007, to be filed. Non-Consent Calendar b. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. 10. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE (Engineering. Operations & Maintenance, and Technical Services) Consent Calendar a. Order draft Operations Committee Minutes for the regular meeting held on February 7, 2007, to be filed. b. Ratify Change Order No. 31 to Primary Clarifiers Nos. 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of $16,964, increasing the total contract amount to $72,897,044. C. Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with MDS Consulting to provide for additional services for Surveying Services, Specification No. PSA-2003-176, for an additional amount of $50,000, increasing the total contract amount not to exceed $550,000. 02/28/07 Page 4 d. Approve a budget increase of $440,000 to the budget for Rehabilitation of Westside Pump Station, Contract No. 3-52, for a total budget amount of $8,731,000. e. Approve Amendment No. 4 to Cooperative Projects Program Contract No. 0130 with the City of Orange providing for a time extension with no additional funding. f. Ratify Change Order No. 22 to Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, with Steve P. Rados, Inc., authorizing an addition of $251,350, increasing the total contract amount to $31,116,026. g. (1) Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Black and Veatch for engineering services for Power Monitoring and Control at Plants No. 1 and No. 2, Job No. J-33-3, for an amount not to exceed $1,184,736; and. (2) Approve a 20% contingency (5236.947). h. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Dudek & Associates, Inc., providing for additional engineering services for Rehabilitation of District Siphons, Contract No. 2-68, for an additional amount of $164,000, increasing the total contract amount not to exceed $1,151,156. i. (1) Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell to provide construction support services for Trickling Filters at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-90. for an additional amount of S7,480.600. increasing the total contract amount not to exceed S17,563.820-, and. (2) Approve a 2.5% contingency ($440,000). j. Approve a budget increase of $2,844,000 to the budget for Rehabilitation of College Avenue Pump Station, Contract No. 7-47. for a total budget amount of S10,820.000. Non-Consent Calendar k. Consideration of items deleted from Operations Committee Consent Calendar, if any. 11. ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE (Finance. Human Resources, and Information Technology) Consent Calendar a. Order draft Administration Committee Minutes for the regular meeting held on February 14, 2007, to be filed. b. (1) Direct staff to issue new fixed rate Certificates of Participation (COP) debt sufficient to refund up to $280 million of COP Series 2003; and, (2) Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and enter into a sole source Consultant Services Agreement with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to provide 02/28/07 Page 5 bond counsel and disclosure counsel services in an amount not to exceed $125,000. C. Approve the selection of Alliant Insurance Services, Inc., to serve as Property, Liability, and Workers' Compensation Insurance Broker of Record for a one-year period commencing on March 1, 2007, with the option to renew for an additional four one-year periods at an average commission rate per line of insurance of eight (8) percent. d. Approve the FY 2007-08 budget assumptions and direct staff to incorporate these parameters in preparing the FY 2007-08 budget update. Non-Consent Calendar e. Consideration of items deleted from Administration Committee Consent Calendar, if any. 12. GWR SYSTEM STEERING COMMITTEE (GWRSSC) GWRSSC Consent Calendar a. Verbal update re Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Steering Committee meeting held on February 26, 2007. GWRSSC Non-Consent Calendar b. Consideration of items deleted from GWRSSC Consent Calendar, if any. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 14. Closed Session f CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6. as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 02/28/07 Page 6 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL RE. ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Government Code Section 54956.9(b)) - Significant Exposure to Litigation Number of Potential Cases: 1 Case: ARB Claim re Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements, Reach A, Contract No. 7-36: and Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-41 b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any. on matters considered in closed session 15, Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 16. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report. 17. Future Meeting Date: The next Board of Directors regular meeting is scheduled for March 28, 2007. at 7:00 p.m. 18. Adjournment 02/28/07 Page 7 r Agenda Posting: In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2,this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Clerk of the Board. Items Not Posted: In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action,it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b)as an emergency item or because there is a need to take immediate action,which need came to the attention of the Board subsequent to the posting of agenda,or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted in the manner as above, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. Public Comments: Any member of the public may address the Board of Directors on specific agenda items or matters of general interest. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). If you wish to speak, please complete a Speaker's Form(located at the table outside of the Board Room)and give it to the Clerk of the Board. Consent Calendar:All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance,there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name,address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. Items Continued: Items may be continued from this meeting without further notice to a Committee or Board meeting held within five(5)days of this meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(3). Meeting Adjournment: This meeting may be adjourned to a later time and items of business from this agenda may be considered at the later meeting by Order of Adjournment and Notice in accordance with Government Code Section 54955(posted within 24 hours). Accommodations for the Disabled: The Board of Directors Meeting Room is wheelchair accessible. If you require any special disability related accommodations, please contact the Orange County Sanitation District Clerk of the Board's office at(714)593-7130 at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Requests must specify the nature of the disability and the type of accommodation requested. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors, items shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board no later than the close of business 14 days :preceding the Board meeting. The Clerk of the Board shall include on the agenda all items submitted by :Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. General Manager James D. Ruth (714)593-7110 jruth ocsd.com :Assistant General Manager Bob Ghirelli (714) 593-7400 rghirelli(a)ocsd.com Clerk of the Board Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 pkvle anocsd.com :Director of Engineering Jim Herberg (714)593-7020 jherbergaocsd.com :,Director of Fin. &Admin Services Lorenzo Tyner (714) 593-7550 Itvner()ocsd.com i Director of Operations& Nick Arhontes (714)593-7210 narhontesaocsd.com Maintenance Director of Technical Services Ed Torres (714)593-7080 etorres aeocsd.com General Counsel.............................................Brad Hod!!?......................................(714)564-2606.....bhoginQwss-law.corn.................................. H:\dept\agenda\Board Agendas\2007 Board Agendas\022807 agenda.doc Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING January 24, 2007 .�•j saN�rar�o o -r ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 • Minutes for Board Meeting 01/24/07 Page 2 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on January 24, 2006 at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation, the roll was called and the Clerk of the Board reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X James M. Ferryman, Chair Bob Ooten X Doug Davert, Vice Chair Jim Palmer X Steve Anderson Tom Beamish X Charles Antos Gordon Shanks X Don Bankhead Vacant X Carolyn Cavecche Jon Dumitru X Steven Choi Sukhee Kang X Larry Crandall John Collins X Bill Dalton Mark Rosen X Richard Freschi Brad Reese X Cathy Green Don Hansen X Phil Luebben Prakash Narain X Patsy Marshall Jim Dow X Darryl Miller Douglas Reinhart X Roy Moore John Beauman X Joy Neugebauer Al Krippner X Chris Norby Vacant X Ken Parker Catherine Driscoll X David Shawver Brian Donahue X Harry Sidhu Lucille Kring X Sal Tinajero David Benavidez X Constance Underhill Joseph Aguirre X Mark Waldman Ralph Rodriguez X Don Webb Leslie Daigle X Jim Winder John Anderson STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Jim Ruth, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Clerk of the Board; Nick Arhontes; Bret Colson; Bob Ghirelli; Jim Herberg; Ed Torres; Lorenzo Tyner; Bret Colson; Lilia Kovac; Juanita Skillman; Paula Zeller; Matt Smith OTHERS PRESENT: Brad Hogin, General Counsel; Eric Christen; Thom Coughran; Mike Holton; Jackie Nutting; Art Perry; Randy Robert Minutes for Board Meeting 01/24/07 Page 3 ' MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file minute excerpts from the following re appointment of active and alternate Directors, as follows: City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director Board of Supervisors Chris Norby 1 st District vacant Buena Park Patsy Marshall Jim Dow Costa Mesa Sanitary James Ferryman Bob Ooten District Irvine Steven Choi Sukhee Kang La Habra Steve Anderson Tom Beamish Los Alamitos Ken Parker Catherine Driscoll Midway City Sanitary Joy L. Neugebauer Al Krippner District Newport Beach Don Webb Leslie Daigle Placentia Connie Underhill Joseph Aguirre Santa Ana Sal Tinajero David Benavides Tustin Doug Davert Jim Palmer Villa Park Rich Freschi Brad Reese Yorba Linda Jim Winder John Anderson PUBLIC COMMENTS Public comments were given by Jackie Nutting from Associated Builder's Contracts; Randy Roberts of Champion Electric; Eric Christen of CFEC; and Mike Holton of Helix Electric on proposed design build legislation that would adversely affect non-union shops deeming them unqualified, drive construction projects costs higher, and limiting the competition. Mr. Jim Ruth, General Manager, indicated that negotiations have not been finalized with the unions, and that staff would be submitting a position policy for the Board of Directors to consider adopting. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair Ferryman thanked Directors Cavecche and Miller for having served as Committee Chairs. He welcomed all the new directors appointed to the Sanitation District, and announced he has appointed Director Larry Crandall as Chair of the Engineering and Operations Committee, and Director Green as Vice Chair; Director Waldman as Chair of the Finance and Administration and Director Luebben as Vice Chair; Director Steve Anderson was recognized and provided a brief overview of the CASA Annual Conference he had attended which included legislation of biosolids-related issues, Congress supporting infrastructure issues and possible funding implications. Chair Ferryman also reminded the Board of Directors of the importance for new Directors to attend the Orientation meeting that would be held on February 1ST REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Jim Ruth, General Manager, provided a brief report on departmental reorganizations and a pending study of Information Technology structure; labor negotiations; management and EMT training program progress; and the formation of a CIP fast-track team. He also reported that the Sanitation District has received $2.2 million in grants; one from FEMA and one from Federal / Minutes for Board Meeting 01/24/07 + Page 4 Resources Agency for SARI Line repair work. He recognized Director of Technical Services, Ed Torres, who provided an overview of the new composting biosolids facility located in Kern County. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Brad Hogin had no report. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS 12/15/06 12/31/06 Totals $16,553,423.60 $13,447,954.96 Director Cavecche abstained from discussion and voting on Warrant Nos. 86618, 86669, 86741, 86753, 86982, 87059, and 87196. Director Shawver abstained from discussion and voting on Warrant Nos. 86963, 86448, 86453, 86885, 86925, and 86947. Director Sidhu abstained from discussion and voting on Warrants No. 86550 and 86554. Director Winder abstained from discussion and voting on Warrant No 86825. Directors Green, Norby and Tinajero abstained. Abstentions were pursuant to California Government Code Section 84308. CONSENT CALENDAR 8. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Order the minutes for the regular meeting held on December 20, 2006, to be filed and deemed approved, as mailed. Directors Choi, Webb, Green, and Underhill abstained. b. MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Authorize staff to annex 64.37 acres to Orange County Sanitation District in the vicinity of La Vereda Drive, Skyline Drive and Lemon Heights Drive, in an unincorporated area of Orange County; (2)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 07-01, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-60— Lemon Heights Annexation); and, (3) Defer collection of associated fees for proposed Annexation No. OCSD-60— Lemon Heights Annexation until a sewer connection is permitted. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Minutes for Board Meeting , 01/24/07 Page 5 ' COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 9. STEERING COMMITTEE Chair Ferryman reported that the Hawk Industries permit hearing appeal was heard and approved to accept the General Manager's recommendation to uphold the November 2, 2006 decision to collect fines due. Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Order draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on December 20, 2006, to be filed. Director Choi abstained. Non-Consent Calendar No items were considered. 10. FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Finance and Administration Committee Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Order draft Finance and Administration Committee Minutes for the Special meeting held on January 3, 2007, to be filed. 11. GWR SYSTEM STEERING COMMITTEE (GWRSSC) GWRSSC Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Order Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Steering Committee minutes for the December 11, 2006 meeting. NON CONSENT CALENDAR 12. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve Plans and Specifications for Plant No. 1 HR Building Fire Lane Access and Additional Parking, Job No. FE05-17R, on file at the office of the Clerk of the Board; (2) Receive and file bid tabulation; i Minutes for Board Meeting 01/24/07 Page 6 (3)Award a construction contract to Green Giant Landscape, Inc. for Plant No. 1 HR Building Fire Lane Access and Additional Parking, Job No. FE05-17R, for an amount not to exceed $412,000; and, (4) Approve a 5% contingency ($20,600). 13. a. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 54956.9(a): The Board convened in closed session at 7:55 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9(a). Confidential minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Clerk of the Board in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. b. RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: The Board reconvened in regular session at 8:05 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. 4-t-�Alo Penny M. Kyl Clerk of the Board Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 12101106 to 12/15106 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 86406 IPMC Go Parsons $ 1,091,127.00 Engineering Services-Integrated Program/Project Management,Temporary Staffing,Mat'I.&Supplies 86407 Malcolm Pimie,Inc. 34,276.21 Professional Services 11-26 86408 ACTA Laboratories,Inc. 190.00 Outside Laboratory Services 86409 American Fidelity Assurance Company 557.40 Employee Voluntary Cancer Insurance 86410 American Training Resources,Inc. 1,071.68 Safety Videos 86411 Arch Wireless Operating Company,Inc. 1,219.60 Wireless Services 86412 Aurora Pictures,Inc. 325.00 Safety Videos 86413 Authentic Promotions.Com 3,205.62 Promotional Items for FOG(Fats,Oils&Grease)Program-Tin Cans 86414 Bartel Associates,L.L.C. 2,700.00 Professional Services-Actuarial Services,Benefits Review and Cost Analysis 86415 BMC Business Machines Consultants,Inc. 6,357.25 (10)HP Laserjet 1320TN Printers 86416 Califomia Dept.of Child Support 1,240.12 Wage Gamishment 86417 California Hazardous Services,Inc. 800.00 Underground Storage Tank Repairs-SB989 Compliance 86418 California Recreation Company 2,460.00 Boat Slip Rental Fees for Ocean Monitoring Vessel Nerissa 86419 Casual Gourmet 64.43 Meeting Expenses 86420 CDW Government,Inc. 9,671.11 (1)Xerox Phaser 7760/DX Printer 86421 CMAA 150.00 Membership 86422 Coast Transmission 2,681.13 Vehicle Repairs&Maintenance Services-V-531 86423 Columbia Analytical Services,Inc. 858.00 Analysis of Wastewater,Industrial Wastewater&Biosolids 86424 Compressor and Engine Supply,Inc. 2,059.84 Fuel Filter Elements-LSVB 86425 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 898.43 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 86426 Corporate Express 31.30 Disposable Cameras 86427 California Special District Association 600.00 Membership 86428 CWEA Membership 220.00 Membership(Calif.Water Environment Assoc.) 86429 CWEA Specialty Conference 140.00 Training Registration 86430 Dionex Corporation 343.96 Lab Parts&Supplies 86431 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 10,499.77 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 86432 Environmental Science Associate(ESA) 1,839.76 Professional Services J-00-5 86433 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 474.92 Lab Parts&Supplies 86434 Franchise Tax Board 100.95 Wage Garnishment 86435 Gates Fiberglass Installers 1,478.88 Fiberglass Repair 86436 Hub Auto Supply 592.85 Vehicle Parts&Supplies 86437 ID Enhancements,Inc. 1,734.00 Casi-Rusco I.D.Badges 86438 Voided Check - - 86439 Interstate Batteries of Cal Coast 2,185.50 Batteries for Vehicles&Carts 86440 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL CIO Local 501 4,610.33 Dues Deduction 86441 Joseph M.Plecnik 1,000.00 Professional Services-Evaluation of Polyethylene Tank for Bleach Service 86442 Kings County Tax Collector 12,658.39 Property Taxes 86443 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 86444 McMaster Carr Supply Co. 182.79 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86445 Court Order 225.00 Wage Garnishment 86446 National Bond&Trust 2,856.67 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 86447 OCB Reprographics 19,317.06 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 86448 OCEA 620.03 Dues Deduction 86448 Onesource Distributors,Inc. 703.62 Electrical Parts&Supplies 86450 Pacific Publishers 8.00 Publication 86451 PCG Industries 1,145.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-Shaft 86452 PCS Express,Inc. 244.00 Courier Service 86453 Peace Officers Council of CA 1.584.00 Dues Deduction,Supervisors&Professionals 86454 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 861.85 Employee Voluntary Legal Service Insurance Premium H ldept\asd\EXCEL.dta\2201APSHARE\Claims Paid ReportM-07\Claims Paid Report-12-15-06 EXHIBIT A RW2101?c Page 1 of 9 102007 Claims Paid From 12101/06 to 12/15106 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 86455 Procare Work Injury Center 2,765.00 Medical Screenings 86456 Reliastar Life Insurance Company 8,252.86 Voluntary Life,Cancer&Supplemental Short-Term Disability Insurance 86457 RM Automation Go RM Controls 194.48 Instrument Supplies 86458 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 1,226.25 Professional Services-Concrete Repairs at Plant 2 Dewatering Bldg. 86459 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 798.00 Training Registration 86460 SARBS-CWEA 45.00 Training Registration 86461 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. 1,176.67 Service Agreement-DI Water Systems at Plants 1 &2 86462 Spec Services,Inc. 10,531.98 Engineering Services 7-32-1 86463 St.Croix Sensory,Inc. 2.420.00 Olfactometry Testing Services 86464 Testamerica Ontario 754.00 Analysis of Biosolids 86465 Testo,Inc. 695.01 Evaluation and Repair of Testo 350 Portable Emission Analyzer 86466 Thermo Electron North America,L.L.C. 113.10 Instrument Parts&Supplies 86467 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 443.72 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86468 Time Warner Communication 51.07 Cable Services 86469 UBS Financial Services,Inc. 23.679.69 Remarketing Fee-1992 Series Advanced Refunding COPs 86470 UC Regents 3.927.56 Professional Services-Strategic Process Study Research Project 86471 United Way 60.00 Employee Contributions 86472 Vortex Corp. 2,310.06 Door Repairs-Plant 2 Maintenance Bldg.and Lab 86473 VWR Scientific Products 966.67 Lab Parts&Supplies 86474 Court Order 597.50 Wage Garnishment 86475 Patrick B.Carnahan 207.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86476 James E.Colston 2,142.32 Meetingffraining Expense Reimbursement 86477 James R.Harris 347.66 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86478 Jamiann M.Questa 137.27 Meetingffraining Expense Reimbursement 86479 Matthew P.Smith 1,227.73 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86480 Michael Vuong 190.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86481 CAPPO Conference Registration 780.00 Meeting Registration-Division 230 86482 Orange County Sanitation District 8,713.48 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 86483 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 49,495.00 Professional Services SP-34 86484 Synagro West,Inc. 225,403.31 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 86485 AAAS 142.00 Membership(American Assoc.for Advancement of Science) 86486 American Airlines 3,611.90 Travel Services 86487 Amtech Elevator Services 1.400.00 Monthly Elevator Maintenance at Pits.1 &2 86488 AppleOne Employment Service 9,446.27 Temporary Employment Services 86489 AT&T California/MCI 22.81 Telephone Service 86490 Callan Associates,Inc. 3,759.50 Investment Advisor 86491 Compressor Components of California 4,480.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-(32)LSVB Pilot Fuel Valves 86492 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 61.03 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 86493 Corporate Express 1,265.65 Office Supplies 86494 County of Orange Auditor Controller 1,517.87 Maintenance Agreement-Repair/Installation of Base,Handheld&Vehicle Radios 86495 CSAC Excess Insurance Authority 3,155.94 Employee Assistance Program 86496 Eberhard Equipment 221.36 Repair&Maintenance Services-Water Pump 86497 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 666.76 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 86498 Environmental Compliance Inspection Svice. 1,680.00 Professional Services-Fats,Oil Grease(FOG Program)Inspections 86499 Ewing Irrigation Industrial 231.64 Landscape Irrigation Parts&Supplies 86500 Foodcraft Coffee&Refreshment Services 148.00 Meeting Supplies 86501 Franklin Covey 341.57 Office Supplies 86502 Frys Electronics 3.44 Computer Supplies 86503 City of Fullerton 41.88 Water Use 86504 Garden Grove Sanitary District 183.30 Water Use H.kdept%asdtEXCEL.dta\-220WPSHARE%Ctaims Paid Report106-07lCtaims Paid Report-12-15-06 EXHIBIT A finr210[tc Page 2 of 9 1rz12007 Claims Paid From 12101106 to 12/15/06 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 86505 Harold Primrose Ice 90.00 Ice For Samples 86506 Hewlett Packard Company 765.03 Computer Hardware/Software 86507 Home Depot 1,140.16 Misc.Repair&Maintenance Material 86508 City of Huntington Beach 14,630.38 Water Use 86509 Hydro Conduit DBA Rinker Metals 1,500.00 Repairs&Maintenance Materials-21 Foot Section of 42"Diameter Pipe 86510 Jays Catering 501.75 Meeting Expenses 86511 Kforce,Inc. 2,359.50 Temporary Employment Services 86512 M.J.Schiff and Associates,Inc. 14,468.96 Temporary Employment Services 86513 Manpower Professional 2,880.00 Temporary Employment Services 86514 MassMutual Michel Financial Group 145.41 Executive Disability Plan Premium 86515 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. 4,978.05 Mechanical Parts&Supplies-Rollers for Daft Sweeps 86516 O C Tanner Recognition Company 1,683.21 Employee Service Awards Program 86517 OCB Reprographics 2,699.63 Printing Service-MO 1126100 86518 Office Depot Business Services Division 1,483.50 Office Supplies 86519 Optio Software,Inc. 6,709.37 Software Maintenance Agreement 86520 Orange County Hose Company 72.41 Hydraulic Hose Supplies&Parts 86521 Orange Courier 73.19 Courier Services 86522 Oxygen Service Company 162.06 Specialty Gases 86523 Postmaster 116.00 Post Office Box Rental 86524 Prudential Overall Supply 1,499.50 Uniforms&Related Articles 86525 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 60.12 Demurrage 86526 City of Seal Beach Finance Dept. 359.20 Water Use 86527 Snap On,Inc.DBA Shopkey 2,268.79 Maintenance Agreement 86528 Sunset Ford 480.89 Vehicle Parts&Service 86529 TekSystems 12,136.00 Temporary Employment Services 86530 The Orange County Register 957.00 Notices&Ads 86531 The Walking Man,Inc. 950.00 Public Notice Printing&Mailing Services Various Projects 86532 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 640.17 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86533 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 48.29 Automotive Parts&Supplies 86534 United Parcel Service 128.27 Parcel Services 86535 Verizon California 706.03 Telephone Services 86536 Xerox Corporation 19,437.96 Copier Leases&Managed Services 86537 Marian M.Alter 106.78 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86538 Jose L.Eroles 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 86539 Denise M.Martinez 989.62 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86540 Jeffrey T.Reed 1,104.36 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86541 Alexander Shaaban 632.33 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86542 Aquarium of The Pacific 51.80 Reimbursable Employee Activity Expense 86543 California Department of Fish and Game 200.00 Section 160 Permit Fee-Steam/Lake Alteration Agreement 86544 County of Orange Auditor Controller 645.00 Administrative Fee-Adjustments to Property Tax Bills 86545 Entertainment Publications,Inc. 448.00 Reimbursed Employee Activities 86546 Michael H.Johnson 663.32 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 86547 Internal Revenue Service 320.00 Wage Garnishment 86548 AA-1 Services,Inc. 95,625.00 Professional Services-Plt.2 Digesters F&G Liner Replacements 86549 American Express 30,684.34 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 86550 Black&Veatch Corporation 57,331.19 Engineering Services-P1-76&J-77 86551 Brown&Caldwell 322,886.13 Professional Services 132-90&P2-91 86552 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 151,793.28 Engineering Service J47 86553 Carollo Engineers 246,944.51 Professional Services P2-66 86554 Disneyland Resort 127,161.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program HidepMsdlEXCEL.dta52201APSHARM[aims Paid Report%06-07%Ctaims Paid Report-12-15.06 EXHIBIT A ew210nc Page 3 of 9 IM007 Claims Paid From 12101/06 to 12115106 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 86555 Earth Tech,Inc. 131,860.39 Professional Services 3-58&1-2-4 86556 Hill Brothers 51.064.87 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 86557 Kemiron Companies,Inc. 121,055.94 Ferric Chloride 86558 Malcolm Pimie,Inc. 165,483.30 Professional Services 1-10,1-2-4&5-50 86559 MDS Consulting 47,235.73 Professional Surveying Services 1-2-4 86560 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 268,167.41 Sodium Hypochlorite 86561 Polydyne,Inc. 47,822.60 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 86562 So Cal Gas Company 32,090.94 Natural Gas 86563 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 208,485.37 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 86564 UBS Financial Services,Inc. 36,911.09 Remarketing Fee-2000 A&B Series Advanced Refunding COPs 86565 US Peroxide,L.L.C. 142,951.27 Odor&Corrosion Control Treatment for Coll.Sys.;Hydrogen Peroxide&Ferrous Chloride 86566 Ameron International 982,589.31 Construction I-2-4P 86567 J F Shea Construction,Inc. 5,131,973.88 Construction 132-66 86568 J R Filanc Construction 86,929.75 Construction P1-76 86569 Margate Construction,Inc. 244,463.00 Construction P1-37 86570 Union Bank of America Escrow 570,219.32 Construction J-77,Retention 86571 J F Shea Construction,Inc. 595.635.75 Construction J-77 86572 J R Filanc Construction 1,012,013.10 Construction P1-82 86573 J F Shea Construction,Inc. 112.640.40 Construction P2-74 86574 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 215.62 Long Distance Telephone Service 86575 A W Chesterton 3,617.31 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86576 Ablaze Group,Inc. 10,679.00 Software Consulting Services-Crystal Reports 86577 ABESCO 381.76 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86578 Absolute Standards,Inc. 50.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 86579 Advance Business Graphics 1,965.93 Stationery 86580 Agilent Technologies,Inc. 110.48 Lab Parts&Supplies 86581 Airgas Safety,Inc. 9,323.42 Safety Supplies 86562 AK Siewers 255.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 86583 AKM Consulting Engineers 11,100.00 Professional Services-Part-Time Dig Alert Technician 86584 All American Sewer Tools 1,141.02 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86585 Alta-Robbins,Inc. 62.50 Instrument Supplies 86586 American Air Balance Co.,Inc. 1,350.00 Maintenance Services-Cleaning of HVACS System 86587 American Chemical Society 144.00 Membership 86588 American Society of Civil Engineers 250.00 Membership 86589 American Water Works Assoc./Water Quality 173.00 Membership 86590 Applied Industrial Technology 833.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86591 Aquatic Bioassay and Consulting Labs,Inc. 2,595.00 Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing 86592 Aquatic Biosystems,Inc. 348.50 Lab Parts&Supplies 86593 Arch Wireless Operating Company,Inc. 935.62 Wireless Services 86594 ARGOS Technologies,Inc. 125.13 Lab Parts&Supplies 86595 Ashbrook Corporation 3,907.16 Winklepress Parts&Supplies 86596 ASTD American Society for Training&Dev. 180.00 Membership 86597 AT&T Universal Biller 2,316.05 Telephone Service 86598 AT&T Califomia/MCI 1.689.33 Telephone Service 86599 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 55.52 Telephone Service 86600 ATCC:American Type Culture Collection 173.40 Lab Parts&Supplies 86601 Awards&Trophies Company 77.92 Awards&Plaques 86602 Basic Chemical Solutions,L.L.C. 15,522.83 Sodium Bisulfite&Sodium Hydroxide 86603 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 4,323.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86604 Belisle&Associates 1.781.42 On-Site Training-Business Writing H:ldeptlasMEXCEL.d1a1220\APSHARE1Claims Paid Report106-0710aims Paid Report-12-15-06 EXHIBIT A flnl21(Mc Page 4 of 9 1/2/2007 o Claims Paid From 12101/06 to 12115106 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 86605 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 8.11 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86606 Bennett Bowen Lighthouse 2,422.36 Instrument Parts&Supplies 86607 Berg-Nelson Co.,Inc. 3,070.88 Fire Hose 86608 Berge's Governor Service 267.30 Silicone Hose 86609 BioMerieux Vitek,Inc. 938.97 Lab Parts&Supplies 86610 BMC Business Machines Consultants,Inc. 385.13 HP9000 Staples 86611 Boyle Engineering Corporation 10,936.08 Professional Services 1-2-4 86612 Burke Engineering Co. 3,300.43 Instrument Parts&Supplies 86613 Bush&Associates,Inc. 6,452.00 Professional Services 5-62 86614 City of Fountain Valley 803.00 Fire Department Permit 86615 County of Orange 382.49 Maint.Agreement-Repair/Installation of Base,Handheld&Vehicle Radios 86616 California Hazardous Services,Inc. 6,600.00 Underground Storage Tank Maintenance/Cleaning 86617 Cameron Compression Systems 958.18 Filters 86618 Cardlock Fuel Systems,Inc. 16.161.04 Fuel Card Program-District Vehicles&Monitoring Vessel 86619 Casual Gourmet 374.60 Meeting Expenses 86620 Century Spring Corporation 58.15 Extension Springs 86621 Charles P.Crowley Co. 14,038.06 Pumps 86622 Cimtec Automation 1,504.30 Software Upgrade&Hardware-VERSAPRO&VERSAMAX 86623 City of Huntington Beach 200.00 Coastal Development Permit 86624 City of Westminster 166.28 Water Use 86625 CMAA 240.00 Membership 86626 CNS Environmental,Inc. 347.00 Professional Services 5-51 86627 Coast Plumbing 4,427.61 Plumbing Services 86628 Command Concepts 2,199.61 Publications-"EMS Field Guide" 86629 Communications Supply Corp. 203.40 Electrical Parts&Supplies 86630 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 5,127.73 Computer Batteries Maintenance Agreement 86631 Conrad&Associates,L.L.P. 7,394.00 Professional Services-Financial Auditing Services 86632 Consolidated Electrical Distributors,Inc. 2,334.08 Electrical Parts&Supplies 86633 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1.484.03 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 86634 Controlled Motion Solutions 99.41 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86635 Coordinated Storage Systems,Inc. 5,217.10 (400)Metal Shelves&Hardware for Pit.1 Warehouse 86636 Corporate Express 3,290.01 Office Supplies 86637 Cortech Engineering 2.883.19 Pump Supplies 86638 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,612.96 Electrical Parts&Supplies 86639 Crane Veyor Corp. 2,186.06 Repair&Maintenance Services-Overhead Cranes 86640 CRC Press,Inc. 223.98 Publications 86641 Culligan of Orange County 1,592.84 Maint.Agreement-Cen Gen Water Softener System 86642 CWEA Membership 110.00 Membership(Calif.Water Environment Assoc.) 86643 Dapper Tire Co. 187.83 Truck Tires 86644 David's Tree Service 2,000.00 Tree Maint.Service 86645 Dell Computer 2,801.29 Toner Cartridges 86646 Desert Pumps&Parts,Inc. 10,034.03 Pump Parts&Supplies 86647 Dezurik Water Controls 1,116.29 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86648 Dieterich-Post Company 554.14 Office Furniture 86649 Dunn Edwards Corporation 113.86 Paint Supplies 86650 Ecology Control Industries 7,215.90 Hazardous Waste Disposal 86651 Electra Bond,Inc. 964.36 Repair&Maintenance Services-Outlet Pipe 86652 Electrical Reliability Services,Inc. 1,970.00 Professional Services-Electrical Reliability Testing for Capital Projects 86653 Employers Group 3,923.48 Membership 86654 Enchanter,Inc. 2,900.00 Ocean Monitoring&Outfall Inspection&Maintenance H.ldeptlasd\EXCEL.dta12201APSHARE1Ciaims Paid Report106.071CIaims Paid Report-12-15-06 EXHIBIT A fir,r2l011c Page 5 of 9 1r2n007 Claims Paid From 12/01106 to 12115/06 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 86655 Engineered Parking Systems 924.56 Traffic Controller 86656 Environmental Resource Associates 1,291.74 Lab Parts&Supplies 86657 Ewing Irrigation Industrial 1,521.38 Landscape Irrigation Parts&Supplies 86658 FEDEX Corporation 39.71 Freight Services 86659 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 3,204.58 Lab Parts&Supplies 86660 Infrared Training Center 924.27 Termacam Batteries&Charger 86661 Flo Systems,Inc. 4,927.30 Pump Parts&Supplies 86662 Forestry Suppliers 1,104.86 Lab Parts&Supplies 86663 Forked Engineering&Surveying,Inc. 343.34 Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 86664 Foundation for Cross Connection Control 100.00 Membership 86665 Fountain Valley Paints.Inc. 311.88 Paint Supplies 86666 Fountain Valley Rancho Hand Wash 1.192.00 Vehicle Washing&Waxing Services 86667 Franklin Covey 604.56 Office Supplies 86668 Frys Electronics 496.64 Computer Supplies 86669 Ganahl Lumber Company 2.151.47 Lumber/Hardware 86670 Garratt Callahan Company 7.458.88 Repair&Maintenance Services-Remove&Replace Resin from Water Softeners 86671 GBC(General Binding Corp) 29.87 Office Supplies 86672 G.F.O.A.(Government Finance Officers Assoc.) 2,900.00 Training Registration 86673 Gierlich Mitchell,Inc. 5,741.41 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86674 Grainger,Inc. 1,626.14 Mechanical&Electrical Parts,Supplies,Locks&Tools 86675 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 67.93 Janitorial Supplies 86676 Green Parrot 108.29 Meeting Supplies 86677 Guarantee Records Management 1,019.02 Off-Site Records Storage 86678 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 1,409.63 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86679 Hatch&Kirk,Inc. 1,006.81 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86680 Hewlett Packard Company 99.13 Computer Hardware-Cables 86681 Home Depot 64.59 Misc.Repair&Maintenance Material 86682 Industrial Distribution Group 1,247.48 Mechanical Parts,Supplies,&Tools 86683 Innerfine Engineering 888.07 Sewerline Video Inspections 86684 Invensys Systems,Inc. 3,233.88 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86685 Ironman Parts&Services 299.42 Central Generator Filters 86686 Irvine Ranch Water District 7.66 Water Use 86687 JG Tucker and Son,Inc. 3,523.69 Rescue Rope System 86688 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 16,344.68 Inspect/Repair Light Fixture @ Sari Gate;Valve&Meter Vault on Outfall Lines;Pressure Manholes @ Plt.2 86689 Jays Catering 276.92 Meeting Expenses 86690 John Lisee Pumps 251.59 Pump Parts&Supplies 86691 Johnstone Supply 668.04 Electrical Parts&Supplies 86692 Kleinfelder,Inc. 426.00 Solls,Concrete&Other Materials Testing 86693 L&N Image Apparel 152.16 OCSD Staff Jackets w/Logo-Medical Team 86694 Lab Safety Supply,Inc. 299.69 Misc.Office Furniture 86695 Lascomm 2,009.31 Computer Software/Hardware 86696 Lee&Ro,Inc. 12,824.53 Professional Services 132-47 86697 Liebert Cassidy 2,506.00 Orange County Employment Relations Consortium Annual Payment 86698 Lord&Sons,Inc. 1,018.96 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86699 M.J.Schiff and Associates,Inc. 330.00 Professional Services-Outfall Corrosion Assessment 86700 M.T.Motor Repair 13,890.61 Repair/Rebuild Motor 86701 Maintenance Technology Corp. 502.78 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86702 Matt Chlor,Inc. 5,107.02 Valves 86703 McJunkin Corporation 1,504.57 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86704 McMaster Carr Supply Co. 3,042.95 Mechanical Parts,Keys&Ladders H:ldeptlasdlEXCEL.dta1220UAPSHAREICtaims Paid Report106-071C1aims Paid Report-12-15-06 EXHIBIT A finn10@c Page 6 of 9 112n007 o Claims Paid From 12101/06 to 12/15106 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 86705 Medlin Controls Co. 560.92 Instrument Parts&Supplies 86706 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. 2,769.18 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86707 Mission Uniform Service 329.65 Uniform Rentals 86708 Moodys Investors Service 10,500.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees-Series 2000 COPS 86709 NASSCO/PACP 250.00 Membership 86710 National Plant Services,Inc. 460.00 Vacuum Truck Services 86711 National Seminars Group 1,197.00 Training Registration 86712 Neal Supply Co. 457.36 Plumbing Supplies 86713 Neutron Products,Inc. 11,385.57 Anionic Polymer 86714 Newark Electronics 124.16 Instrument Supplies 86715 Nextel Communications 902.63 Air Time 86716 OCB Reprographics 407.30 Printing Service-MO 1/26l00 86717 Office Depot Business Services Division 465.02 Office Supplies 86718 Onescurce Distributors,Inc. 12,635.35 Electrical Parts&Supplies 86719 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 1,015.52 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 86720 ORCO Construction Supply 200.16 Marking Paint 86721 Oxygen Service Company 2,747.05 Specialty Gases or Lab Parts&Supplies 86722 Pacific Mechanical Supply 562.55 Plumbing Supplies 86723 PC Mall Gov.,Inc. 2,257.12 Computer Hardware/Software-APC Smart UPS&Net Management Card 86724 PL Hawn Company,Inc. 128.01 Electrical Parts&Supplies 86725 Plumbers Depot,Inc. 942.81 Tools&Maintenance Supplies 86726 Pompaction,Inc. 1,219.00 Pump Oil Filters 86727 Port Supply 8.53 Repair&Maintenance Materials 86728 Power Design 8,426.05 Electrical Parts&Supplies 86729 Praxair,Inc. 44.67 Lab Parts&Supplies 86730 Printerguy 6,053.37 Printer Maintenance 86731 Propipe 23.790.39 Sewertine Cleaning for City of Tustin&Unincorporated County Property 86732 Prudential Overall Supply 1,518.63 Uniforms&Related Articles 86733 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 9,277.28 Hydromatic Sump Pump 86734 Reliastar Life Insurance Company 8,076.76 Voluntary Life,Cancer&Supplemental Short-Term Disability Insurance 86735 Rainbow Disposal Co. 3,864.33 Trash Removal 86736 Restek Corp. 705.47 Lab Parts&Supplies 86737 Rosemount Analytical,Inc. 1.505.50 Instrument Parts&Supplies 86738 Roto Rooter NOC#11 603.75 Unclogging Sewer Drains at Pit. 1 Operations Control Center 86739 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. 131.12 Paint Supplies 86740 RSA Sutter Soil Products 1,575.84 Soil Materials 86741 SC Fuels 2,439.12 Bulk Diesel Fuel 86742 South Coast Environmental Co. 589.16 Air Quality Monitoring 86743 Schwing Bioset 19.56 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86744 Sea Bird Electronics,Inc, 312.00 Lab Instrument Maintenance&Calibration Services 86745 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 964.24 Simple Green Cleaner/Degreaser&Hardware 86746 Shaw Pump and Supply,Inc. 1,095.40 Pump Parts&Supplies 86747 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,719.59 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86748 Siemens Building Technologies,Inc. 4,555.29 Instrument Parts&Supplies 86749 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. 150.00 Service Agreement-DI Water Systems at Plants 1 &2 86750 Sigma Aldrich,Inc. 5,975.35 Lab Parts&Supplies 86751 SKC West,Inc. 898.26 Lab Parts&Supplies 86752 Southern California Fuse,Inc. 296.28 Generator Fuse 86753 Southern Counties Lubricants 7,394.84 Oil&Grease 86754 Summit Steel 2,201.29 Metal H:tdept\asd\EXCEL.dtal22C1APSHARESClaims Paid Report106-071Claims Paid Report-12.15-06 EXHIBIT A firv21011c Page 7 of 9 102007 Claims Paid From 12101106 to 12/15106 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 86755 Sunset Industrial Parts 7,123.62 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86756 Technical Service Group,Inc. 1,381.60 SCADA System VAX Service Agreement 86757 TCH Associates,Inc. 822.92 Lab Parts&Supplies 86758 Terminix International 1,009.00 Pest Control 86759 Testamerica Ontario 5,816.00 Analysis of Biosolids 86760 Tetra Tech,Inc. 18,070.53 Professional Services 7-37 86761 The Plastic Mart,Inc. 3,747.62 Educational Sewer Science Kits 86762 Thermo Electron North America,L.L.C. 899.45 Lab Parts&Supplies 86763 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 8,336.52 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86764 Thompson Publishing Group 323.50 Publication 86765 The Clock Sales and Service Co.,Inc. 133.49 Repair&Maintenance Services-Acroprint Time Clock 86766 Times Community News 50.00 Notices&Ads 86767 T-Mobile 107.77 Wireless Air Time 86768 Todd Painting,Inc. 1,410.00 Painting Services 86769 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 956.79 Locks&Keys 86770 Toshiba International Corp. 832.43 Electrical Parts&Supplies 86771 Tran Consulting Engineers 9,437.55 Engineering Services 7-21 86772 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 414.35 Automotive Parts&Supplies 86773 ULine 503.05 Repair&Maintenance Materials 86774 Ultra Scientific 248.32 Lab Parts&Supplies 86775 The Unisource Corporation 958.92 Office Supplies 86776 United Pacific Services,Inc. 11,766.99 Landscape Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 and Pump Stations;Tree Trimming Services 86777 Vapex,Inc. 729.00 Instrument Parts&Supplies 86778 Verizon California 77.91 Telephone Services 86779 Vemes Plumbing 3,657.63 Service Contract-Testing,Repair&Cert.Backflow Devices 86780 Vortex Corp. 1,562.45 Door and Gate Repairs 86781 VWR Scientific Products 4,180.13 Lab Parts&Supplies 86782 Wartsila Automation North America,Inc. 228.56 Instrument Parts&Supplies 86783 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 19,098.82 Engineering Services J-67 86784 Waters Corporation 2,449.66 Lab Parts&Supplies 86785 Weber Scientific 400.07 Lab Parts&Supplies 86786 WEF 346.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 86787 West Lite Supply Company,Inc. 4,269.16 Electrical Parts&Supplies 86788 Western States Controls 1,219.67 Instrument Parts&Supplies 86789 Wilson Supply,Inc. 91.61 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 86790 Workforce Software,Inc. 13,000.00 Professional Services-J-104 86791 Yale/Chase Materials Handling,Inc. 1,910.23 Electric Cart Parts 86792 Torrey Pines Bank 4.575.25 Construction P1-76,Retention 86793 Marc A.Brown 296.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86794 Richard Gallegos 170.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86795 Robert P.Ghirelli 1,304.52 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86796 Michael I.Gold 1.180.03 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86797 Jin H.Kim 125.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86798 Vladimir A.Kogan 246.43 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86799 Denise M.Martinez 12.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86800 Samuel L.Mowbray 540.78 Meeling/Training Expense Reimbursement 86801 Cindy K.Murra 751.77 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86802 Quynh D.Nguyen 398.10 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86803 Fred J.O'Brien 200.72 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement 86804 Milton Rocha 95.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement H 1depRasMEXCEL.dta52201APSHARBCtaims Paid Report106-071Ctaims Paid Report-12-15-06 EXHIBIT A firt210/1c Page 8 of 9 1/2/2007 se e Claims Paid From 12101/06 to 12/15106 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 86705 Medlin Controls Co. 560.92 Instrument Parts&Supplies 86706 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. 2,769.18 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86707 Mission Uniform Service 329.65 Uniform Rentals 86708 Moodys Investors Service 10,500.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees-Series 2000 COPs 86709 NASSCO/PACP 250.00 Membership 86710 National Plant Services,Inc. 460.00 Vacuum Truck Services 86711 National Seminars Group 1,197.00 Training Registration 86712 Neal Supply Co. 457.36 Plumbing Supplies 86713 Neutron Products,Inc. 11,385.57 Anionic Polymer 86714 Newark Electronics 124.16 Instrument Supplies 86715 Nextel Communications 902.63 Air Time 86716 OCB Reprographics 407.30 Printing Service-MO 1/26100 86717 Office Depot Business Services Division 465.02 Office Supplies 86718 Onesource Distributors,Inc. 12,635.35 Electrical Parts&Supplies 86719 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 1,015.52 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 86720 ORCO Construction Supply 200.16 Marking Paint 86721 Oxygen Service Company 2,747.05 Specialty Gases or Lab Parts&Supplies 86722 Pacific Mechanical Supply 562.55 Plumbing Supplies 86723 PC Mall Gov.,Inc. 2,257.12 Computer Hardware/Software-APC Smart UPS&Net Management Card 86724 PL Hawn Company,Inc. 128.01 Electrical Parts&Supplies 86725 Plumbers Depot,Inc. 942.81 Tools&Maintenance Supplies 86726 Pompaction,Inc. 1,219.00 Pump Oil Filters 86727 Port Supply 8.53 Repair&Maintenance Materials 86728 Power Design 8,426.05 Electrical Parts&Supplies 86729 Praxair,Inc. 44.67 Lab Parts&Supplies 86730 Printerguy 6,053.37 Printer Maintenance 86731 Propipe 23,790.39 Sewerline Cleaning for City of Tustin&Unincorporated County Property 86732 Prudential Overall Supply 1.518.63 Uniforms&Related Articles 86733 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 9,277.28 Hydromatic Sump Pump 86734 Reliastar Life Insurance Company 8,076.76 Voluntary Life,Cancer&Supplemental Short-Term Disability Insurance 86735 Rainbow Disposal Co. 3,864.33 Trash Removal 86736 Restek Corp. 705.47 Lab Parts&Supplies 86737 Rosemount Analytical,Inc. 1,505.50 Instrument Parts&Supplies 86738 Roto Rooter NOC#11 603.75 Unclogging Sewer Drains at Pit. 1 Operations Control Center 86739 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. 131.12 Paint Supplies 86740 RSA Sutter Soil Products 1,575.84 Soil Materials 86741 SC Fuels 2,439.12 Bulk Diesel Fuel 86742 South Coast Environmental Co. 589.16 Air Quality Monitoring 86743 Schwing Bioset 19.56 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86744 Sea Bird Electronics,Inc. 312.00 Lab Instrument Maintenance&Calibration Services 86745 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 964.24 Simple Green Cleaner/Degreaser&Hardware 86746 Shaw Pump and Supply,Inc. 1,095.40 Pump Parts&Supplies 86747 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,719.59 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86748 Siemens Building Technologies,Inc. 4,555.29 Instrument Parts&Supplies 86749 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. 150.00 Service Agreement-DI Water Systems at Plants 1 &2 86750 Sigma Aldrich,Inc. 5,975.35 Lab Parts&Supplies 86751 SKC West,Inc. 898.26 Lab Parts&Supplies 86752 Southern California Fuse,Inc. 296.28 Generator Fuse 86753 Southern Counties Lubricants 7,394.84 Oil&Grease 86754 Summit Steel 2,201.29 Metal H.Vdept%asdlEXCEL.dia\2201APSHARE%CIaims Paid Report106-0MIaims Paid Report-12-15-06 EXHIBIT A fin121011c Page 7 of 9 1/2/2007 Claims Paid From 12/01106 to 12/15106 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 86755 Sunset Industrial Parts 7,123.62 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86756 Technical Service Group,Inc. 1,381.60 SCADA System VAX Service Agreement 86757 TCH Associates,Inc. 822.92 Lab Parts&Supplies 86758 Terminix International 1,009.00 Pest Control 86759 Testamerica Ontario 5,816.00 Analysis of Biosolids 86760 Tetra Tech,Inc. 18.070.53 Professional Services 7-37 86761 The Plastic Mart,Inc. 3.747.62 Educational Sewer Science Kits 86762 Thermo Electron North America,L.L.C. 899.45 Lab Parts&Supplies 86763 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 8,336.52 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86764 Thompson Publishing Group 323.50 Publication 86765 The Clock Sales and Service Co.,Inc. 133.49 Repair&Maintenance Services-Acroprint Time Clock 86766 Times Community News 50.00 Notices&Ads 86767 T-Mobile 107.77 Wireless Air Time 86768 Todd Painting,Inc. 1,410.00 Painting Services 86769 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 956,79 Locks&Keys 86770 Toshiba International Corp. 832.43 Electrical Parts&Supplies 86771 Tran Consulting Engineers 9,437.55 Engineering Services 7-21 86772 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 414.35 Automotive Parts&Supplies 86773 ULine 503.05 Repair&Maintenance Materials 86774 Ultra Scientific 248.32 Lab Parts&Supplies 86775 The Unisource Corporation 958.92 Office Supplies 86776 United Pacific Services,Inc. 11,766.99 Landscape Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 and Pump Stations;Tree Trimming Services 86777 Vapex,Inc. 729.00 Instrument Parts&Supplies 86778 Verizon California 77.91 Telephone Services 86779 Vernes Plumbing 3,657.63 Service Contract-Testing,Repair&Cert.Backflow Devices 86780 Vortex Corp. 1,562.45 Door and Gate Repairs 86781 VWR Scientific Products 4,180.13 Lab Parts&Supplies 86782 Wartsila Automation North America,Inc. 228.56 Instrument Parts&Supplies 86783 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 19,098.82 Engineering Services J-67 86784 Waters Corporation 2,449.66 Lab Parts&Supplies 86785 Weber Scientific 400.07 Lab Parts&Supplies 86786 WE 346.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 86787 West Lite Supply Company,Inc. 4,269.16 Electrical Parts&Supplies 86788 Western States Controls 1,219.67 Instrument Parts&Supplies 86789 Wilson Supply,Inc. 91.61 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 86790 Workforce Software,Inc. 13,000.00 Professional Services-J-104 86791 Yale/Chase Materials Handling,Inc. 1,910.23 Electric Cart Parts 86792 Torrey Pines Bank 4,575.25 Construction P1-76,Retention 86793 Marc A.Brown 296.00 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 86794 Richard Gallegos 170.00 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 86795 Robert P.Ghirelli 1,304.52 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 86796 Michael I.Gold 1,180.03 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 86797 Jin H.Kim 125.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86798 Vladimir A.Kogan 246.43 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 86799 Denise M.Martinez 12.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86800 Samuel L.Mowbray 540.78 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 86801 Cindy K.Murra 751.77 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 86802 Quynh D.Nguyen 398.10 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 86803 Fred J.O'Brien 200.72 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 86804 Milton Rocha 95.00 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement H%dept%asdlEXCEL.dta12201APSHARE1Claims Paid Reportl06-07XClaims Paid Report-12-15-06 EXHIBIT A rnn10/1c Page 8 of 9 102007 •.r a Claims Paid From 12101/06 to 12115106 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 86805 Y.J.Shao 1,974.04 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86806 John W.Swindler 920.71 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86807 Christopher Tetzlaff 170.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86808 Robert J.Thiede 566.36 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 86809 James E.Colston 1,066.71 Employee Computer Loan Program 86810 County of Orange Auditor Controller 435.00 Administrative Fee-Adjustments to Property Tax Bills or Encroachment Permit 86811 Jerry F.Evangelista 1,538.82 Employee Computer Loan Program 86812 Richard Gallegos 1,187.32 Employee Computer Loan Program 86813 Orange County Sanitation District 1,134.26 Petty Cash Reimb. 86814 CMTA California Municipal Treasurers 500.00 Training Registration 86815 Government Finance Officers Association 550.00 GFOA Review Fee-Certificate in Achievement Award for Financial Reporting for Year Ended June 30,2006 Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 13,360,376.11 Payroll Disbursements 35380 - 35472 Employee Paychecks $ 139,220.62 Interim Payroll 12106/06 35473 - 35677 Employee Paychecks 535,722.12 Interim Payroll,Retirement,Termination,and Vacation/Sick Leave Payouts 12/1/06-12107/06 133995 -134563 Direct Deposit Statements 1,199,141.07 Interim 415 Payments 12/01/06&Biweekly Payroll 12/06/06 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,874,083.81 Wire Transfer Payments OCSD Payroll Taxes&Contributions $ 705,808.24 Biweekly Payroll 12/06/06 Deutsche Bank 490,795.75 Series 2006 Certificates of Participation November Interest Payment JP Morgan Chase Bank 122,359.69 Series 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation November Interest Payment Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 1,318,963.68 Total Claims Paid 12101106-12/15106 $ 16,553,423.60 H:ldepflasdlEXCEL.dia12201APSHARE1Claims Paid Reportl06.070aims Paid Report-12-15-06 EXHIBIT A fin/210/ic Page 9 of 9 1/2I2007 w Claims Paid From 12/16/06 to 12131/06 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 86816 Air Products&Chemicals $ 25,829.07 O&M Agreement Oxy.Gen.Sys.MO 8-9-89 86817 Blue Cross of California 405,753.44 Medical Insurance Premium 86818 City of Newport Beach 1,268,902.87 Reimbursement Agreement-OCSD Trunk Sewer Improvements 86819 Delta Dental 58,150.55 Dental Insurance Plan 86820 Innerline Engineering 29,895.50 Sewerline Video Inspections 86821 IPMC c/o Parsons 979,075.00 Engineering Services-Integrated Program/Project Management,Temporary Staffing,Mat'I.&Supplies 86822 ITT Cannon Electric 44,034.38 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86823 Knott's Berry Farm Foods 39,672.59 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86824 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 66,391.47 Medical Insurance Premium 86825 Occidental Energy Marketing.Inc. 71.470.79 Natural Gas for CenGen/CoGen 86826 St.Jude Medical Center 56,150.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86827 Southern California Edison 401,879.86 Power 86828 Summit Consulting International 28,900.00 Legal Services 7-36 &7-41 86829 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 159,824.78 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 86830 California Business Bank 112,348.22 Construction 1-24A,Retention 86831 Helix Electric,Inc. 328,622.18 Construction SP-81 86832 Mike Bubalo Construction Co.,Inc. 1,011,133.98 Construction 1-24A 86833 Steve P.Rados,Inc. 134,588.33 Construction 1-2-4 86834 Union Bank of California 36,513.57 Construction SP-81,Retention 86835 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 207,834.60 Construction-Manhole Rehab.Project&Fold&Reform PVC Pipe/Rehab.of Small Dia.Sewer Pipe 86836 Acroburr,Inc.#2 133.31 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86837 Air Industries Company,A PCC Company 19,269.05 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86838 Air Industries Corporationn 2.594.59 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86839 Allied Pacific Metal Stamping 2,075.03 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86840 Amcor-Sunclipse,Inc. 9,209.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86841 Amerimax Building Products,Inc. 1,849.08 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86842 Ametek Aerospace 725.23 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86843 Anaheim Extrusion Co.,Inc. 613.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86844 Aqua-Con 1,123.27 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86845 Arrowhead Products 5,838.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86846 Aviation Equipment,Inc. 4,021.24 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86847 Accounting Options,Inc. 1.371.75 Temporary Employment Services 86848 Airgas-West 9.00 Demurrage/Cylinder Rental 86849 APW Enclosure Systems 5,894.02 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86850 ARB,Inc. 11,000.00 Construction 7-36,7-39&741 86851 ARO Services 481.47 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86852 ASTD American Society for Training&Dev. 650.00 Training Registration 86853 AWSI 133.68 Department of Transportation Program Management&Testing 86854 Bazz Houston Co. 2,632.11 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86855 Bearing Inspections,Inc. 1,042.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86856 Beo-Mag Electronics 293.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86857 Bodycote Lindberg Corp. 707.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86858 Boeing-Anaheim 22,150.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86859 The Boeing Company 10,870.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86860 Brasstech#2,Inc. 29.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86861 Brasstech,Inc. 5,366.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86862 BAF Industries 2,388.39 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86863 Bellport Group,Inc. 6,611.88 Repair&Maintenance Services-Nerissa Ocean Monitoring Vessel H:%dept%asMEXCEL.dta12261APSHARE%Claims Paid ReporlM-0TClaims Paid Report-12-31.06 EXHIBIT B rnrz10nc Page 1 of 9 1/1112D07 Claims Paid From 12/16/06 to 12/31106 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 86864 BI Technologies 3,833.53 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86865 Bootwadd 170.00 Mobile Safety Shoe Service 86866 Bucknam&Associates,Inc. 560.00 Professional Services-Pavement Management 86867 Cambro Manufacturing 1,959,46 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86868 Cannon Equipment West 653.60 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86869 Cargill,Inc. 5,404.83 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86870 Catalina Cylinders 4,432.91 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86871 Central Powder Coating 1,460.29 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86872 Criterion Machine Works 1,419.39 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86873 Crockett Container Corp. 5,216.15 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86874 California Dept.of Child Support 1,240.12 Wage Garnishment 86875 CASA 14,727.00 Membership(Calif.Association of Sanitation Agencies) 86876 CASA 2,000.00 Meeting Registration-Division 110 86877 Casual Gourmet 263.34 Meeting Expenses 86878 CD Video,Inc. 716.90 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86879 Certified Truck Bodies 14,992.63 Vehicle Repair&Maintenance Services-V-571 86880 Cingular Wireless Airtime 4,983.19 Wireless Services 86881 City of Orange 1,100.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-OCSD Manhole Adjustment to Grade-Metropolitan Drive 86882 Compressor Components of California 13,241.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-(32)LSVB Pilot Fuel Valves 86883 Corporate Express 608.62 Office Supplies 86884 County of Orange Auditor Controller 17.50 Encroachment Permit-SARI Interceptor Sewer Line 86885 CR&R,Inc. 830.00 Trash Removal-40 Yard Dumpsters 86886 Culligan of Orange County 46.90 Maint.Agreement-Cen Gen Water Softener System 86887 CWEA Membership 220.00 Membership(Calif.Water Environment Assoc.) 86888 CWEA Specialty Conference 140.00 Training Registration 86889 Data Solder,Inc. 267.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86890 Dr.Smoothie Enterprises 717.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86891 Ducommun Aerostructures,Inc. 2,964.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86892 Department of Toxic Substances Control 1,022.50 Hazardous Waste Fees 86893 Electro Metral Finishing Corp. 67.39 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86894 Engravers Ink Company 56.32 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86895 Excel Media,L.L.C. 341.46 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86896 Eagle Protection of California 550.00 Building Security Alarm System for North County Yard Property&Fire Sprinkler&Security Sys.Monitoring 86897 Ecology Control Industries 936.95 Hazardous Waste Disposal 86898 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 10,403.C6 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 86899 Ewing Irrigation Industrial 126.11 Landscape Irrigation Parts&Supplies 86900 Excal Visual Communications 506.75 Training Supplies 86901 Express Lens Lab 3,596.88 Safety Glasses 86902 Fabrication Concepts Corporation 3,327.62 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86903 FEDEX Corporation 87.69 Freight Services 86904 Franchise Tax Board 90.00 Wage Garnishment 86905 Franklin Covey 32.24 Office Supplies 86906 Frasco Profiles 637.75 Human Resources Background Checks 86907 Gallade Chemicl,Inc. 1,180.11 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86908 General Ceramics,L.L.C. 508.92 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86909 General Container Corp. 428.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86910 Georgia Pacific 4,909.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86911 Gomtech Electronics 403.11 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86912 Garralt Callahan Company 1,104.87 Chemicals H:ldeptlasMEXCEL.dta%220\APSHAREIClaims Paid Report106.071Claims Paid Report-12-31-06 EXHIBIT B finnlortc Page 2 of 9 1/11/2007 Claims Paid From 12116/06 to 12/31/06 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 86913 Gold Coast Awards,Inc. 14.24 Name Badges 86914 Green Parrot 313.56 Meeting Supplies 86915 H Koch&Sons 5,384.06 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86916 Harbor Truck Bodies,Inc. 52.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86917 Hach c/o Ponton Industries 80322 Repair&Maintenance Services-Controllers 86918 Harold Primrose Ice 140.00 Ice For Samples 86919 Health Science Associates 1,271.70 Professional Services-Asbestos Study 86920 Hewlett Packard Company 1,534,36 (2)HP Printers 86921 Home Depot 330.37 Misc.Repair&Maintenance Material 86922 Irvine Sensors Corp. 11,022.47 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86923 In Place Machining 2,302.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-Machine Keyway on Gear Box 86924 Internal Revenue Service 320.00 Wage Garnishment 86925 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL CIO Local 501 4,634.58 Dues Deduction 86926 Iron Mountain 105.00 Storage Fee-Bid Documents Pi-37 86927 ISEC,Inc. 4.680.42 Lab Parts&Supplies 86928 Jellco Container,Inc. 880.48 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86929 Johnson Controls,Inc. 21,231.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86930 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 4,334.11 Repair&Maintenance Services-Leak Repair at PEPS Discharge Header 86931 Jays Catering 512.42 Meeting Expenses 86932 Kenlen Specialties,Inc. 346.45 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86933 Kirkhill Rubber 15,628.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86934 Kforce,Inc. 1,372.80 Temporary Employment Services 86935 Lam Lighting,Inc. 4,828.94 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86936 Logi Graphics 215.02 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86937 Los Angeles Times 15,201.45 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86938 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 86939 Magnetic Metals Corporation 2,026.87 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86940 Manpower Professional 2,976.00 Temporary Employment Services 86941 Monster,Inc. 4,666.66 Notices&Ads 86942 Court Order 225.00 Wage Garnishment 86943 National Bond&Trust 2,856.67 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 86944 NRC Environmental Services 2,259.33 Waste Oil Pick Up&Disposal 86945 0 C Tanner Recognition Company 1,618.90 Employee Service Awards Program 86946 OCB Reprographics 2,471.81 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 86947 OCEA 610.78 Dues Deduction 86948 Office Depot Business Services Division 722.87 Office Supplies 86949 Oracle Corporation 740.50 Software Update,License&Support 86950 Oracle USA, Inc. 18,889.01 Service Agreement 86951 Orange Coast Database Associates,Inc. 1,420.00 Training Registration 86952 Oxygen Service Company 841.14 Lab Parts&Supplies 86953 Pacific Utility Products 560.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86954 Pacific Western Container 3,083.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86955 Paramount Disc Manufacturing,Inc. 653.67 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86956 Powercoat Services 147.51 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86957 Powercoat Services#3 3,242.73 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86958 Precious Metals Plating Co. 20.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86959 Precision Powdercoating,Inc. 110.89 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86960 Private Label Laboratories 3,232.01 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86961 Progressive Marketing 3.110.93 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program H.ldepllasdlEXCELdlal2201APSHARE\Claims Paid Report106-071Claims Paid Report-12-31-06 EXHIBIT B en/21011c Page 3 of 9 1111n007 Claims Paid From 12/16/06 to 12/31/06 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 86862 Pure Chem Products Co.,Inc. 56.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86963 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,602.00 Dues Deduction,Supervisors&Professionals 86964 PIMG DBA Centre For Health Care 30.00 Pre-Employment Physicals 86965 Propipe 5,611.25 Clean/CCTV 68'of 39"RCP Sewer 86966 Prudential Overall Supply 1,520.06 Uniforms&Related Articles 86967 R L Abbott&Associates 3,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 86968 Railmakers,Inc. 93.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86969 Ricoh Electronics#2 9,642.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86970 Rigiflex Technology,Inc. 45.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86971 RBC Transport Dynamics 1,803.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86972 Red Wing Shoes 713.74 Safety Shoes 86973 Ritz Camera Centers,Inc. 28.26 Photo Processing&Single-Use Cameras 86974 Roto Rooter NOC#11 4,327.44 Repair&Maintenance Services-Plumbing Problems at Plant 2 Lab 86975 Royale Cleaners 16.00 Dry Cleaning Services 86976 Sekisui TA Industries,Inc. 13,338.55 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86977 Select Circuits 188.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86978 Shepard Bros.,Inc. 3,417.55 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86979 Statek Corporation 3,115.80 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86980 SARBS-CWEA 45.00 Training Registration 86981 SAWPA 10,000.00 Phase III of the Storm Water Quality Standards Task Force(Santa Ana Water Protection Agency) 86982 SC Fuels 17,216.06 Diesel Fuel 86983 Science Applications International 11,970.00 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 86984 Scott&Whitehead 1,952.50 Labor/Employee Relations&Representation Services 86985 SFPP,L.P. 186.06 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86986 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. 1,057.58 Service Agreement-DI Water Systems at Plants 1&2 86987 Snell Infrared 2,690.00 Training Registration 86988 Southern California Edison Company 10,971.45 Installation of Transformer at College Pump Station 86989 SPS Technologies 15,445.45 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86990 Michael Harhen 6,083.23 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86991 Toyota Racing Development#2 2,868.53 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86992 Transline Technology,Inc. 513.40 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86993 Taylor,Dunn 8.065.04 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 86994 TekSystems 11,185.00 Temporary Employment Services 86995 Terminix International 2,165.00 Pest Control 86996 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 940.45 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 86997 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 152.69 Automotive Parts&Supplies 86998 U.S.Geological Survey 5,116.25 Professional Services-Deploy Current Meters off Huntington Beach from 7-06 to 10-06 86999 United Direct Marketing 2,952.50 Public Notice Printing&Distribution Costs for Various Construction Projects-3-58 87000 United Parcel Service 789.50 Parcel Services 87001 United Way 60.00 Employee Contributions 87002 University of Wisconsin Madison 995.00 Training Registration 87003 Veeco Electro Fab,Inc.#2 112.90 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87004 Vendor,Inc. 16,472.08 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87005 Valve Automation&Controls 515.14 Repair&Maintenance Services-Actuator 87006 Verizon California 77.05 Telephone Services 87007 Vemes Plumbing 425.00 Service Contract-Testing&Cert.Backflow Devices at Pits. 1 &2&Pump Sta. 87008 Vision Service Plan CA 9,974.64 Vision Service Premium 87009 Vocam USA,L.L.C. 1,196.46 Safety Video Program 87010 West American Rubber Company 13,575.65 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program H.WeptlasOEXCEL.dta1226WPSHARE1Claims Paid ReportW607\Claims Paid Report-12.31-06 EXHIBIT B firV2104c Page 4 of 9 1/11/2D07 Claims Paid From 12116106 to 12/31/06 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87011 Weyerhaeuser Co.#2 7,308.37 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87012 The Wackenhut Corporation 7,818.06 Security Guards 87013 Water Education Foundation 100.00 Membership 87014 Wumbus Corporation 1.088.58 Safety Video 87015 Xyon Business Solutions,Inc. 1,680.00 Temporary Employment Services 87016 XYZ Electronics,Inc. 350.48 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87017 Court Order 597.50 Wage Garnishment 87018 Zimmerman Yacht Maintenance 100.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-Ocean Monitoring Vessel Nerissa 87019 Union Bank Of California 14,954.25 Construction 1-2-4,Retention 87020 Juan J.Ambriz 61.00 Meetingffraining Expense Reimbursement 87021 Robert M.Bell 493.52 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87022 Michael J.Boess 190.00 Meetingfiraining Expense Reimbursement 87023 Frank Chavez 190.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87024 Peter Cheffs 56.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87025 Kelly J.Christensen 1,040.09 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87026 James E.Colston 239.60 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87027 Santiago A.Escobar 654.52 Meeting[Training Expense Reimbursement 87028 Chris Maher 32.21 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87029 Umesh N.Murthy 125.00 Meetingffraining Expense Reimbursement 87030 James D.Niswonger 570.39 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement 87031 Fred J.O'Brien 158.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87032 Philip Peterson 621.86 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87033 Henry R.Salgado 606.59 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87034 Richard E.Schlegel,Jr. 334.60 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87035 Richard L.Spencer 695.74 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87036 Robert J.Thiede 67.83 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87037 Bobby L.Unsell 58.39 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87038 Joseph F.Vallone 36.00 Meetingffraining Expense Reimbursement 87039 Aquarium of The Pacific 57.80 Reimbursable Employee Activity Expense 87040 County of Orange 6,000.00 Wage Garnishment 87041 Disneyland Resourt-Group Tickets 5,400.00 Reimbursed Employee Activities 87042 Nicholas Oswald and Costco 2,808.39 Employee Computer Loan Program 87043 Orange County Flood Control District 150.00 Permit Fee 2-68 87044 Basic Chemical Solutions,L.L.C. 36,459.01 Sodium Bisulfite&Sodium Hydroxide 87045 Black&Veatch Corporation 55,381.04 Engineering Services J-102 87046 Brown&Caldwell 31,696.70 Professional Services P1-37 87047 Camp Dresser&Mckee,Inc. 214,033.92 Professional Services J-71-8,P1-97&J-47 87048 Dudek&Associates,Inc. 31,072.65 Professional Services 132-68 87049 Earth Tech,Inc. 60,470.43 Professional Services P2-79&P1-106 87050 Kemira Water Solutions,Inc. 104,221.08 Ferric Chloride 87051 Lee&Ro,Inc. 75,412.18 Professional Services 549,5-51&5-52 87052 Malcolm Pirnie,Inc. 261,461.45 Professional Services P2-80&5-50 87053 Orange County Water District 1,979,125.98 Joint GWRS Project J-36 87054 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 102,603.52 Sodium Hypochlorite 87055 Polydyne,Inc. 45,263.39 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 87056 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 62,380.20 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 87057 US Peroxide,L.L.C. 146,637.90 Odor&Corrosion Control Treatment for Coll.Sys.;Hydrogen Peroxide&Ferrous Chloride 87058 Kiewit Pacific Co. 273,825.00 Construction 5-51 &5-52 87059 Morrow Meadows Corp. 474,759.00 Construction P247-3 H:ldeptlasMEXCEL.dta1220'APSHARE1Claims Paid ReportM-OnClaims Paid Report-12-31-06 EXHIBIT B finrMnc Page 5 of 9 1/11/2007 Claims Paid From 12/16/06 to 12/31106 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87060 Wells Fargo Bank Mac C7300-012 30,425.00 Construction 5-51&5-52,Retention 87061 A W Chesterton 1,407.62 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87062 Agilent Technologies,Inc. 2,896.33 Lab Parts&Supplies 87063 Airgas Safety,Inc. 10,781.37 Safety Supplies 87064 AKM Consulting Engineers 18,091.36 Professional Services-Part-Time Dig Alert Technician&7-36 87065 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 18.36 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87066 American Society of Civil Engineers 270.00 Membership 87067 Applied Industrial Technology 18.36 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87068 Arizona Instrument 1,259.50 Instrument Repair&Calibration Services 87069 Ashbrook Corporation 974.46 Wnklepress Parts&Supplies 87070 AT&T Universal Biller 1.239.09 Telephone Service 87071 AT&T California/MCI 2.213.14 Telephone Service 87072 Atlas Underground,Inc. 2.800.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-Debris Removal&Construct Access Road on Existing Sewer Easement 87073 Bartel Associates,L.L.C. 6.775.00 Professional Services-Actuarial Services,Benefits Review and Cost Analysis 87074 Battery Specialties 282.39 Batteries 87075 Camel Financial,Inc.c/o Bearing Metal 776.88 Metal 87076 Bennett Bowen Lighthouse 144.16 Repair&Maintenance Services-Biosystems Monitors 87077 Bently Nevada Corporation 213.35 Calibration of Vibration Monitors 87078 Berg-Nelson Co.,Inc. 4,606.31 PVC Hose Assemblies 87079 BioMerieux Vitek,Inc. 697.85 Lab Parts&Supplies 87080 Cal Glass,Inc. 546.00 Lab Equipment Service 87081 Carolina Rolling Company,Inc. 485.13 Piping 87082 Certified Truck Bodies 4,094.50 Truck Parts&Supplies 87083 Cleaver Brooks,Inc. 12,500.00 On-Site Training-Boiler Operator 87084 CNS Environmental,Inc. 920.00 Professional Services 5-50 87085 Cole Parmer Instrument Co. 402.88 Lab Parts&Supplies 87086 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 3,260.77 Computer Batteries Maintenance Agreement 87087 Consolidated Electrical Distributors,Inc. 4,133.58 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87088 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 4,727.67 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 87089 Corporate Express 4,236.94 Office Supplies 87090 County Wholesale Electric Co. 149.85 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87091 Desert Pumps&Parts,Inc. 12,240.86 Pump Parts&Supplies 87092 Dezurik Water Controls 1,331.79 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87093 Electra Bond,Inc. 24,836.38 Repair&Maintenance Services-Refurbish&Coat(13)Bellmer Belt Press Rollers 87094 Electrical Reliability Services 4,110.00 Professional Services-Electrical Reliability Testing for Capital Projects 87095 EMEDCO 51.16 Safety Supplies 87096 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 5,639.19 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 87097 Enchanter,Inc. 3,500.00 Ocean Monitoring&Outfall Inspection&Maintenance 87098 Engineering Remediation Resources 2,785.61 Waste Oil Removal 87099 Equa-Chlor 4,904.82 Hydrochloric Acid 87100 Ewing Irrigation Industrial 485.60 Landscape Irrigation Parts&Supplies 87101 FEDEX Corporation 40.95 Freight Services 87102 First American Real Estate Solutions 801.00 On-Line Orange County Property Information 87103 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 3,458.86 Lab Parts&Supplies 87104 Flowserve Corp. 1,382.85 Heat Exchanger 87105 Forkert Engineering&Surveying,Inc. 699.70 Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 87106 Frys Electronics 557.32 Computer Supplies 87107 Garratt Callahan Company 5,836.40 Chemicals 87108 Gates Fiberglass Installers 1,723.25 Fiberglass Repair H.\deptlasdlEXCEL.dta1220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Reporno"7\Claims Paid Repart-12.31.06 EXHIBIT B firV21OAc Page 6 of 9 1/11/2007 1� A Claims Paid From 12/16/06 to 12/31/06 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87109 George Yardley Co. 552.76 Valves 87110 Grainger,Inc. 791.61 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87111 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 109.39 Janitorial Supplies 87112 Greatland Corporation 473.79 Forms-W 2 2006 Year-End Envelopes 87113 Hach clo Portion Industries 607.58 Lab&Instrument Parts&Supplies 87114 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 1,272.84 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87115 HD Supply 646.50 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87116 HDR Engineering,Inc. 21,191.00 Professional Services P2-82 87117 Henry Company-Sealants Division 514.79 Sealer(Quick Seal) 87118 Hi Standard Automotive 109.10 Automotive Parts&Supplies 87119 Home Depot 124.73 Misc. Repair&Maintenance Material 87120 Hope Health/IHAC 543.97 Publication-Wellness Newsletters 87121 Horizon Technology 2,316.85 Lab Instrument Repairs 87122 Hub Auto Supply 345.70 Vehicle Parts&Supplies 87123 Industrial Distribution Group 1,505.34 Mechanical Parts,Supplies,Locks&Tools 87124 Industrial Metal Supply 489.19 Tubing 87125 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 3,216.50 Inventory Fasteners 87126 Interstate Batteries of Cal Coast 853.81 Batteries for Vehicles&Carts 87127 Irvine Pipe&Supply 169.26 Valves 87128 Jays Catering 1,587.21 Meeting Expenses 87129 Johnson&Associates,L.L.C. 5,954.87 Professional Services-2006 Management Compensation Study 87130 Johnstone Supply 775.21 Electrical&Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87131 Kars Advance Materials,Inc. 20,870.98 Professional Services P2-60 87132 Kent Automotive 102.66 Automotive Parts&Supplies 87133 Kleinfelder,Inc. 46.00 Soils,Concrete&Other Materials Testing 87134 LaMotte Company 215.02 Lab Parts&Supplies 87135 Louis Allen Worldwide 4,640.00 On-Site Management Training 87136 Lucci's Gourmet Foods,Inc. 67.29 Meeting Expense 87137 Maintenance Technology Corp. 1,730.98 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87138 McMaster Carr Supply Co. 1,673.83 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87139 Medlin Controls Co. 582.56 Instrument Parts&Supplies 87140 Metrotech Corp. 333.19 Electrical Pipe Markers 87141 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 456.06 Janitorial Supplies 87142 National Assoc.of Clean Water Agencies 725.00 Meeting Registration-Division 620 87143 Neal Supply Co. 297.55 Plumbing Supplies 871" Neutron Products,Inc. 5,925.56 Anionic Polymer 87145 New Brunswick Scientific 1,220.00 Lab Instrument Repairs 87146 City of Newport Beach 187.56 Water Use 87147 Nextteq,L.L.C. 699.47 Pumps 87148 NRG Thermal Services,L.L.C. 374.37 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87149 Nu Way Laser Engraving 128.19 Asset Tags 87150 OCB Reprographics 2,875.16 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 87151 Office Depot Business Services Division 752.61 Office Supplies 87152 01 Analytical 140.08 Lab Parts&Supplies 87153 Omnimark Instrument Corp. 504.21 Instrument Calibration&Certification Services-Moisture Analyzer 87154 Onesource Distributors,Inc. 3,976.98 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87155 Orange County Hose Company 322.17 Hydraulic Hose Supplies&Parts 87156 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 1,081.31 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 87157 Oxygen Service Company 2,958.07 Specialty Gases and Lab Parts&Supplies H:ldepllascREXCEL.dta122MPSHARE1Claims Paid ReportM-OnClaims Paid Report-12-31-06 EXHIBIT B fin/210nc Page 7 of 9 111112007 Claims Paid From 12/16/06 to 12131106 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87158 Pacific Mechanical Supply 2,931.98 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 87159 Parsons Water&Infrastructure,Inc. 24,162.84 Professional Services J-35-1 87160 Pacific Blue Micro 2.818.74 Computer Hardware/Software-Cisco 87161 PC Mall Gov.,Inc. 237.04 Computer Hardware/Software-APC Net Management Card 87162 PCG Industries 750.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-Chopper Pump 87163 PCS Express,Inc. 150.71 Courier Service 87164 Port Supply 379.11 Foul Weather Gear/Clothing-Ocean Monitoring Sampling 87165 Power Design a Division of PowerUp,Inc. 862.00 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87166 Powerflo Products,Inc. 1,825.21 Pump&Pump Supplies 87167 Process Equipment Company 644.94 Pump Parts&Supplies 87168 Prudential Overall Supply 1,524.96 Uniforms&Related Articles 87169 Q Air Calif.-Div.of Pump Engineering 1,649.15 Pump Parts&Supplies 87170 Restek Corporation 941.03 Lab Parts&Supplies 87171 R.F.MacDonald Co 150.78 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87172 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 4,910.00 Engineering Services-Structural&Concrete Inspection,Evaluation&Repair of 66"&84"Interplant Lines 87173 Robert J.Lung&Assoc. 10.016.44 Reproduction of(14)Plant 1 and(14)Plant 2 Aerial Photos(30"x40")Color/Mounted/Laminated 87174 Rockwell Engineering&Equipment Co. 8,800.74 Pump&Pump Parts&Supplies 87175 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. 437.81 Paint Supplies 87176 Saddleback Materials Co.,Inc. 331.40 Sand 87177 SARBS 180.00 Meeting Registration-Division 840 87178 SARBS-CWEA 45.00 Training Registration 87179 SBC Long Distance-Southwestern Bell 1,128.15 Telephone Services 87180 Schwing Bioset 1,699.27 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87181 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 73.71 Demurrage 87182 Scottel Voice&Data,Inc. 2,284.79 Telephone System Maintenance 87183 Sea Bird Electronics,Inc. 952.00 Lab Instrument Maintenance&Calibration Services 87184 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 3,423.93 Spray Cleaners&Absorbent Oil 87185 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 3,114.68 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87186 Siemens c/o Jensen Instrument Co. 962.23 Instrument Parts&Supplies 87187 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. 89.55 Service Agreement-DI Water Systems at Plants 1 &2 87188 Sigma Aldrich,Inc. 255.02 Lab Parts&Supplies 87189 Simpler Life Emergency Provisions 4,684.00 Safety&Emergency Supplies-Meals Ready to Eat 87190 Skalar,Inc. 296.01 Lab Parts&Supplies 87191 SKC West.Inc. 181.57 Lab Parts&Supplies 87192 Snap-On Tools,Inc. 4,995.89 Tools 87193 Snap On Tools/Jesse Gomez 2,383.43 Small Tool Expenses 87194 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 2,005.78 Odor Control Permit 1-10 87195 Southern California Edison 313.47 Power 87196 Southern Counties Lubricants 2,007.68 Oil&Grease 87197 Southern Counties Oil Co. 18,822.44 Diesel Fuel 87198 Spec Services,Inc. 1,359.38 Engineering Services J-33-1 87199 SPEX Certiprep,Inc. 468.87 Lab Parts&Supplies 87200 Stryper Technologies 14,182.88 Computer Hardware/Software-(5)VAX 96 Workstations 87201 Summit Consulting International 12,300.00 Legal Services 7-36 &7-41 87202 Summit Steel 1,688.49 Metal 87203 Sunset Industrial Parts 64.79 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87204 Super Chem Corporation 552.28 Chemicals 87205 Systems Solution Company 3,410.26 Repair&Maintenance Services-Access Control/CCTV Security System 87206 TCH Associates,Inc. 3,311.41 Lab Parts&Supplies H ldeptlasdtEXCEL.dtaN220lAPSHAREtClaims Paid Repor1106-DTClaims Paid Report-12J1-06 EXHIBIT B finrMft Page 8 of 9 1111/2007 4- Claims Paid From 12116106 to 12/31/06 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87207 Tetra Tech,Inc. 18,541.08 Professional Services 7-37 87208 Thermo Electron North America,L.L.C. 1,739.24 Lab Parts&Supplies 87209 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 3,529.54 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87210 TMV Systems Engineering,Inc. 2,000.00 Software Maintenance-SCADA 87211 Tremco Incorporated 1,680.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-Control Center Patio Roof Leak 87212 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 1,434.27 Automotive Parts&Supplies 87213 ULine 213.65 Truck Parts&Supplies 87214 Ultra Scientific 747.59 Lab Parts&Supplies 87215 Underground Service Alert of So.Calif 1,347.20 Membership-Underground Utility Identification/Notification Service 87216 The Unisource Corporation 2.284.75 Office Supplies 87217 Varian,Inc. 484.33 Software-Saturn 87218 Verizon California 173.89 Telephone Services 87219 Vortex Corp. 883.67 Repair&Maintenance Services-Plant 1 Gates 87220 VWR Scientific Products 547.90 Lab Parts&Supplies 87221 Wastewater Technology Trainers 1.445.00 Training Registration 87222 Weber Scientific 515.85 Lab Parts&Supplies 87223 WEF 472.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 87224 West Lite Supply Company,Inc. 351.96 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87225 Xerox Corporation 18,008.26 Copier Leases&Managed Services 87226 York International 56.91 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87227 Zee Medical 462.79 First Aid Supplies 87228 Karen I.Baroldi 795.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87229 William F.Pierce 102.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 10,569,788.91 Payroll Disbursements 35678 - 35747 Employee Paychecks $ 129,817.99 Biweekly Payroll-12/20/06 35748 - 35757 Employee Paychecks 1,161.53 Interim Payroll-12/19/06 35847 - 35847 Employee Paycheck 2,187.33 Interim Payroll-12/29/06' 134564 - 135128 Direct Deposit Statements 1,216,623.82 Biweekly Payroll-12/20/06 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,349,790.67 'Check No.35847 was printed out of order due to printing of biweekly payroll checks for pay date of 01103107. Wire Transfer Payments OCSD Payroll Taxes&Contributions $ 795,338.89 Biweekly Payroll 12/20/06 US Bank 733.036.49 Series 2000 A&B Refunding COPs December Interest Payment Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 1.528.375.38 Total Claims Paid 12/16/06-12131106 $ 13,447,954.96 H:kdept%ascAEXCEL.cfta%220kAPSHARENClaims Paid Reportko"AClaims Paid Report-12-31-06 EXHIBIT B fin21QAc Page 9 of 9 1/11/2007 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Dir. o2/2/za/o7 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 7 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Administrative Services SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308. you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than 8250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving the Orange County Sanitation District. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with the District. In general, you must disclose the basis of the conflict by identifying the name of the firm or individual who was the contributor. For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308, please see your Director's Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS N/A ADDITIONAL INFORMATION See attached listing. ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 01/01/07 to 01/15/07 and 01/16/07 to 01/31/07 Form NO.DW 102-4 Agenda Report-FAHR Dept.320 Revised. 2/20/2007 Page 1 Claims Paid From 01101/07 to 01115107 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 87230 Black&Veatch Corporation $ 28,109.59 Engineering Services-Preliminary Assessment of Digesters A&B 87231 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 33,750.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 87232 Ei Du Pont De Nemours and Company 42,512.00 Painting Maint.Services MO 4-22-98 87233 HDR Engineering,Inc. 51,688.85 Professional Services P1-82 87234 Hewlett Packard Company 84,431.80 Server,Disk Controller,Cables and(50)PCs 87235 Hill Brothers 33,235.61 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 87236 MetLife Life Insurance Company 37,179.99 Group Life,Manager AddT Life,Short&Long-Term Disability&Optional Term Life Ins. 87237 Southern California Edison 86.218.14 Power 87238 Synagro West,Inc. 396,272.98 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 87239 Woodruff Spradlin&Smart 87,168.17 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 87240 J R Filanc Construction 82,151.10 Construction FE05-19 87241 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 504.71 Long Distance Telephone Service 87242 Amtech Elevator Services 1,400.00 Monthly Elevator Maintenance at Plts, 1 &2 87243 AppleOne Employment Service 199.90 Temporary Employment Services 87244 AT&T Califomia/MCI 308.82 Telephone Service 87245 Aurora Pictures,Inc. 990.00 Safety Videos 87246 Bee Man Pest Control,Inc. 375.00 Pest Control 87247 California Climate Action Registry 2,541.67 Annual Registry Participation Fee 87248 California Dept.of Child Support 1,240.12 Wage Garnishment 87249 Charles P.Crowley Co. 7,032.37 Pump,Pump Parts&Supplies 87250 Cingular Wireless Airtime 367.37 Wireless Services 87251 Consolidated Electrical Distributors,Inc. 32.78 Electrical Supplies 87252 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 31.73 Plumbing Supplies 87253 CORRPRO Companies,Inc. 2,985.00 Professional Services-Corrosion Control Stds.,Specs,Drawings&Data Research 87254 County of Orange-Health Care Agency 7,080.50 Waste Discharge Requirements-OCHCA BMPs Inspection Program 87255 C.S.M.F.O 220.00 Membership 87256 Ecology Control Industries 11.207.04 Hazardous Waste Disposal 87257 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 9,281.42 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 87258 ENS Resources,Inc. 10,000.00 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 87259 FEDEX Corporation 170.69 Freight Services 87260 Franchise Tax Board 90.00 Wage Garnishment 87261 Graybar Electric Company 9,875.00 On-Site Technical Training-Proworx32 PLC&Programming 87262 Home Depot 639.06 Misc.Repair&Maintenance Material 87263 City of Huntington Beach 14,404.78 Water Use 87264 Internal Revenue Service 320.00 Wage Garnishment 87265 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL CIO Local 501 4,610.33 Dues Deduction 87266 Kabob Express 155.77 Meeting Expenses 87267 Kforce,Inc. 858.00 Temporary Employment Services 87268 Knowledge Point,L.L.C.,DBA Vura Express 4,620.00 Software Maintenance 87269 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 87270 M.J.Schiff and Associates,Inc. 13,235.82 Temporary Employment Services 87271 Mayer,Brown,Rowe&Maw,L.L.P. 9,995.00 Professional Services-Strategic Planning&Advocacy 87272 Court Order 225.00 Wage Garnishment 87273 Morton Salt 920.79 Salt 87274 Motion Industries,Inc. 120.41 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87275 National Bond&Trust 2,856.67 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 87276 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 1,500.00 Professional Services-Geotechnical Study 87277 OCEA 610.78 Dues Deduction 87278 Office Depot Business Services Division 535.81 Office Supplies 87279 Orange Coast Database Associates,Inc. 25.00 Training Registration H:Wept%as(AEXCEL.dia12201APSHARE%Claims Paid Repor1120071Claims Paid Report-01-15-07 EXHIBIT A finntenc Page 1 of 6 1/2412007 Claims Paid From 01/01/07 to 01/15107 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87280 Oxygen Service Company 101.29 Specialty Gases 87281 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,602.00 Dues Deduction,Supervisors&Professionals 87282 Pixelpushers,Inc. 9,570.00 Professional Services-Internet Design 87283 Platinum Advisors 5,000.00 Legislative Advocacy Efforts&Participation in Legislative Affairs Committee Meetings 87284 Primary Source Office Furnishings,Inc. 2,240.12 Office Furniture&Misc.Equipment 87285 Printerguy 6,166.96 Printer Maintenance 87286 Procare Work Injury Center 1,160.00 Medical Screenings 87287 Robert J.Lung&Assoc. 11,430.12 Professional Services-Aerial Photos of SARI Line 87288 SARBS-CWEA 110.00 Training Registration 87289 Snap-On Tools,Inc. 2,117.87 Tools 87290 Source Graphics 10.33 Service Maintenance Agreement 87291 Taco Bell##2964 200.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87292 The Pittsburgh Conference 615.00 Training Registration 87293 Times Community News 56.25 Notices&Ads 87294 Tony's Lack&Safe Service&Sales 67.47 Locks&Keys 87295 Townsend Public Affairs 5,000.00 Legislative&Executive Advocate for Grant Funding 87296 The Unisource Corporation 9.434.53 Office Supplies 87297 United Parcel Service 24.92 Parcel Services 87298 United Way 60.00 Employee Contributions 87299 US Cost,Inc. 2,397.00 Software Maintenance-Success Estimator 87300 Vocam USA,L.L.C. 871.13 Safety Video Program 87301 WEF 192.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 87302 Xyon Business Solutions,Inc. 1,200.00 Temporary Employment Services 87303 Court Order 597.50 Wage Garnishment 87304 C. Eddie Baker 130.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87305 Karen I.Baroldi 237.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87306 Layne T.Barcldi 690.59 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87307 Chuck M. Forman 63.28 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87308 Robert Holdman 810.20 Meeting[Training Expense Reimbursement 87309 Julie A.Matsumoto 200.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87310 Michael N.Morey 130.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87311 Derek G.Navarrette 68.87 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87312 Doug Rulison 363.09 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87313 Orlando A.Tafolla 62.00 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement 87314 Bobby L.Unsell 62.07 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87315 Bryan Willis 73.77 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87316 Dean K.Yokoyama 74.52 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87317 Paula A.Zeller 235.34 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement 87318 Cingular Wireless 89.94 Wireless Accessories 87319 County of Orange Auditor Controller 690.00 Administrative Fee-Adjustments to Property Tax Bills 87320 County of Orange Auditor Controller 1.020.00 Administrative Fee-Adjustments to Property Tax Bills 87321 County of Orange Auditor Controller 720.00 Administrative Fee-Adjustments to Property Tax Bills 87322 County of Orange Auditor Controller 885.00 Administrative Fee-Adjustments to Property Tax Bills 87323 Black&Veatch Corporation 25,271.88 Engineering Services-P1-76 87324 Brown&Caldwell 126,523.98 Professional Services P2-90 87325 City of Villa Park 27,130.16 Cooperative Projects Reimbursement Program 87326 Devise Technical Products 25,866.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-Structural Damage at Plt.2 Dewatering Bldg. 87327 HDR Engineering,Inc. 33,755.95 Professional Services P1-101 87328 Kemira Water Solutions 128,740.84 Ferric Chloride 87329 Mike Prlich&Sons 34,232.00 Construction FE06-03 87330 MWH Americas,Inc. 26,185.15 Professional Services 132-74 H:ldept%asdlEXCEL.dta12201APSHARE1Claims Paid Report000AClaims Paid Report-01-15-07 EXHIBIT A rrv210no Page 2 of 6 1124/2007 Claims Paid From 01/01/07 to 01/15/07 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87331 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 220,673.64 Sodium Hypochlorite 87332 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 31,175.13 Permit Fees-Annual Emission,Operation&Misc.Fees 87333 TMV Systems Engineering,Inc. 141,807.00 Software-OCSD System Historian 87334 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 231,024.52 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 87335 US Peroxide,L.L.C. 130,769.81 Odor&Corrosion Control Treatment for Coll.Sys.;Hydrogen Peroxide&Ferrous Chloride 87336 Helix Electric,Inc. 368,309.70 Construction SP-81 87337 J F Shea Construction,Inc. 5,183,056.58 Construction P2-66 87338 J R Filanc Construction 1,620,868.50 Construction P1-82 87339 Margate Construction,Inc. 235,150.00 Construction P1-37 87340 Union Bank of America Escrow 575,895.17 Construction P2-66,Retention 87341 J F Shea Construction,Inc. 214,242.10 Construction J-77 87342 Union Bank of California 40,923.30 Construction SP-81,Retention 87343 J F Shea Construction,Inc. 489,389.40 Construction P2-74 87344 A W Chesterton 4,913.76 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87345 Absolute Standards,Inc. 50.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 87346 Accounting Options,Inc. 1,076.75 Temporary Employment Services 87347 Accurate Measurement Systems 2,311.24 Communication Equipment 87348 AccuStandard 130.75 Lab Parts&Supplies 87349 ACE Ergonomics 517.02 Professional Services-Ergonomic Workstation Evaluations 87350 ACR Systems,Inc. 2,507.38 Ins.Parts&Supplies&4"Pressure Hose 87351 Advanced Cooling Technologies 589.00 Air Conditioning Service 87352 Airgas Safety,Inc. 5,190.18 Safety Supplies 87353 American Fidelity Assurance Company 518.90 Employee Voluntary Cancer Insurance 87354 Andrew's Glass Co. 3,494.39 Lab Parts&Supplies 87355 Applied Industrial Technology 4,493.57 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87356 AT&T Universal Biller 2,289.19 Telephone Service 87357 AT&T Califomia/MCI 653.78 Telephone Service 87358 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 47.08 Telephone Service 87359 Awards&Trophies Company 19.48 Awards&Plaques 87360 AWWA 173.00 Membership(American Water Works Association) 87361 Basic Chemical Solutions,L.L.C. 13.419.38 Sodium Bisulfite&Sodium Hydroxide 87362 Battery Specialties 765.71 Batteries 87363 Boyle Engineering Corporation 7,186.30 Professional Services 1-24 87364 Brenntag Pacific,Inc. 1,000.00 Bleach Tank 87365 Cingular Wireless 495.00 Wireless Accessories 87366 California Recreation Company 2,481.91 Boat Slip Rental Fees for Ocean Monitoring Vessel Nerissa 87367 California Relocation Services,Inc. 125.00 Office Files Moving/Relocation Services 87368 CALPELRA 270.00 Membership 87369 City of Orange 3,310.59 Claim Settlement-Damage to City Property 87370 Clayton Group Services,Inc. 1,375.00 Professional Services-Industrial Hygiene 87371 CMAA 55.00 Training Registration 87372 CMAA 270.00 Books&Publications 87373 Coast Fire Equipment 1,937.12 Annual Fire Extinguisher Inspection&Servicing at Plts. 1&2 and Pump Sta.&Fire Extinguishers&Cert. 87374 Cole Parmer Instrument Co. 165.68 Lab Parts&Supplies 87375 Color Copy Center 19,299.11 Training Registration 87376 Con-Way Western Express 204.97 Freight Charges 87377 Conex International,Inc. 1,842.50 Legal Services 87378 Consolidated Electrical Distributors,Inc. 7,543.68 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87379 Control Techniques Drives,Inc. 788.94 Repair&Maintenance Services-Control Board 87380 Corporate Business Interiors 407.28 Miscellaneous Office Furniture 87381 Corporate Express 5,514.72 Office Supplies H:ldeptlasdlEXCEL.dta%220XAPSHARE%Claims Paid Report120070aims Paid Report-01-15-07 EXHIBIT A kn12104c Page 3 of 6 1/2412007 Claims Paid From 01/01/07 to 01/15/07 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87382 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 5,266.29 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87383 County Wholesale Electric Co. 7,389.34 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87384 CR&R,Inc. 315.00 Container Rentals&Waste Disposal Service 87385 CSMFO Annual Conference 500.00 Meeting Registration-Division 220 87386 CWEA Specialty Conference 140.00 Training Registration 87387 David's Tree Service 3,500.00 Tree Maint.Service 87388 Desert Pumps&Parts,Inc. 137.71 Pump Parts&Supplies 87389 Ecology Control Industries 192.09 Hazardous Waste Disposal 87390 Emergency Management Network,Inc. 14,800.00 On-Site Fire Extinguisher Training 87391 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 694.05 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 87392 Employers Group 1,700.00 On-Site Training-Developing Customer Relations 87393 Enchanter,Inc. 1,100.00 Ocean Monitoring&Outfall Inspection&Maintenance 87394 Engineered Parking Systems 619.98 Traffic Spike Spring 87395 Environmental Express 285.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 87396 Equa-Chlor 2,408.05 Hydrochloric Acid 87397 Ewing Irrigation Industrial 260.67 Landscape Irrigation Parts&Supplies 87398 FEDEX Corporation 278.33 Freight Services 87399 Filter Belts,Inc. 13,974.00 Filter Press Belts 87400 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 5,787.33 Lab Parts&Supplies 87401 Flat&Vertical,Inc. 294.00 Core Drilling 87402 Fluor Enterprises,Inc. 935.85 Engineering Services J-84 87403 FTI,Inc. 671.21 Payroll Check Stock 87404 Fuller Truck Accessories 584.44 Tool Boxes 87405 Garratt Callahan Company 4,743.70 Chemicals 87406 Gary D.Gordon Services 2,000.00 Training Registration-Lab Spill Response 87407 General Petroleum 3,910.13 Low Ash Engine Oil 87408 Gold Coast Awards,Inc. 58.23 Name Badges 87409 Golden State Water Company 165.95 Water Use 87410 Goldenwest Window Service 160.00 Groundskeeping Services 87411 Grainger,Inc. 2,571.53 Mechanical&Electrical Parts&Supplies 87412 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 67.93 Janitorial Supplies 87413 Hach c/o Portion Industries 3,788.91 Lab Parts&Supplies 87414 Harold Primrose Ice 70.00 Ice For Samples 87415 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 7,228.04 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87416 Hi Standard Automotive 557.39 Automotive Parts&Supplies 87417 Hilti,Inc. 441.78 Hardware 87418 Home Depot 812.16 Misc.Repair&Maintenance Material 87419 Industrial Distribution Group 4,103.04 Mechanical Parts,Supplies,Locks&Tools 87420 Irvine Pipe&Supply 26.77 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87421 J.R.O.Operations Trust/H.B.Oil 1,570.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87422 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 15,430.00 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Leak Repairs in Effluent Line 87423 Jeffrey P.Mika Photography 4,980.00 Professional Services-Photography for 05106 Annual Report 87424 JJ Keller&Associates 1,503.12 Publication 87425 Jobs Available,Inc. 210.00 Notices&Ads 87426 Johnstone Supply 606.35 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87427 Kforce,Inc. 858.00 Temporary Employment Services 87428 Lorman Education Services 70.00 Training Registration 87429 Malcolm Pirnie,Inc. 12,169.53 Professional Services 1-10 87430 MassMutual Michel Financial Group 224.45 Executive Disability Plan Premium 87431 Matheson Tri Gas,Inc. 962.20 Lab Parts&Supplies 87432 McGraw Hill Company 49.74 Books&Publications H:ldept%asdlEXCEL.dta12201APSHARE%Claims Paid Report1200AClaims Paid Report-01-15-07 EXHIBIT A fN21011c Page 4 of 6 1/24/2007 Claims Paid From 01101/07 to 01/15/07 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87433 McMaster Carr Supply Co. 7,144.48 Mechanical&Lab Parts,Supplies&Tools 87434 Measurement Control Systems,Inc. 2,079.64 Instrument Parts&Supplies 87435 Medlin Controls Co. 1,170.62 Instrument Parts&Supplies 87436 Midway Mfg.&Machining Co. 1,885.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87437 Mine Safety Appliance Co. 582.79 Instrument Maint.Services 87438 Mission Uniform Service 219.77 Uniform Rentals 87439 Mitchell Instrument Co. 77.00 Instrument Parts&Supplies 87440 Mobile Hose&Hydraulic Supply 1,544.06 Pump Parts&Supplies 87441 National Plant Services,Inc. 4,050.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-DAFT Polymer Tank Cleaning 87442 Neal Supply Co. 2,233.45 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 87443 Neutron Products,Inc. 11,858.50 Anionic Polymer 87444 Newark Electronics 140,29 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87445 Nextel Communications 1.445.24 Air Time 87446 NRG Thermal Services.L.L.C. 159.53 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87447 OC8 Reprographics 13,619.04 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 87448 OMllndustries 4.850.00 Chemicals/Solutions 87449 Onesource Distributors.Inc. 539.20 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87450 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 365.83 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 87451 Oxygen Service Company 1,759.83 Specialty Gases and Lab Parts&Supplies 87452 Pacific Mechanical Supply 497.45 Plumbing Supplies 87453 Padgett-Thompson 1,014.00 Training Registration 87454 Parker Supply Company 847.18 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87455 Parkhouse Tire,Inc. 236.94 Tires 87456 Parkson Corporation 2,256.47 Aeration System Parts-Diffusers 87457 PCG Industries 995.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-Shaft 87458 PCS Express,Inc. 489.95 Courier Service 87459 PL Hawn Company,Inc. 1.744.45 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87460 Polydyne,Inc. 17.062.65 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 87461 Praxair,Inc. 163.72 Lab Parts&Supplies 87462 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 835.95 Employee Voluntary Legal Service Insurance Premium 87463 Prudential Overall Supply 3,010.22 Uniforms&Related Articles 87464 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 1,081.55 Pumps 87465 Jamiann M.Questa 134.71 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87466 Reliastar Life Insurance Company 8,631.95 Voluntary Life,Cancer&Supplemental Short-Term Disability Insurance 87467 Rainbow Disposal Co. 206.96 Trash Removal 87468 Red Wing Shoes 152.57 Safety Shoes 87469 Restek Corporation 135.25 Lab Parts&Supplies 87470 Rite In The Rain 54.37 Lab Parts&Supplies 87471 Rockwell Engineering&Equipment Co. 6,431.66 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87472 RS Hughes Co.,Inc. 164.67 Paint Supplies 87473 Rutan&Tucker,L.L.P. 114.50 Legal Services 87474 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 608.86 Mechanical&Electrical Parts,Supplies&Tools 87475 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 2,102.24 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87476 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. 75.00 Service Agreement-DI Water Systems at Plants 1 &2 87477 Skalar,Inc. 209.04 Lab Parts&Supplies 87478 So Cal Gas Company 19,152.48 Natural Gas 87479 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 23,007.43 Permit Fees-Annual Emission,Operation&Misc.Fees 87480 Southern Counties Oil Co. 3,913.98 Diesel Fuel 87481 Sparkletts 2,218.69 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 87482 Sparling Instruments,Inc. 7,940.43 Instrument Parts&Supplies 87483 Summit Steel 740.24 Metal H:hdeptlasMEXCEL.dta12201APSHARE%Claims Paid Report\20071Claims Paid Report-01-1"7 EXHIBIT A fin1210Ac Page 5 of 6 1/24/2007 Claims Paid From 01/01107 to 01/15/07 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87484 Sunset Ford 110.27 Vehicle Parts&Service 87485 Sunset Industrial Parts 229.51 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87486 Terminix International 1,054.00 Pest Control 87487 Testamerica Ontario 147.00 Analysis of Biosolids 87488 The Standard Insurance Company 5,360.56 Executive Disability Plan Premium 87489 THELCO Corporation 3,376.84 Pump 87490 Thermo Electron North America,L.L.C. 55.12 Lab Parts&Supplies 87491 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 1,443.04 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87492 Time Warner Communication 51.07 Cable Services 87493 Tortuga Pool Services 310.00 Maintenance Agreement-Weekly Cleaning of Atrium Pond 87494 Traffic Control Service,Inc. 323.25 Traffic Safety Supplies/Rentals 87495 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 571.82 Automotive Parts&Supplies 87496 Ultra Scientific 101.85 Lab Parts&Supplies 87497 United Pacific Services,Inc. 11,316.99 Landscape Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 and Pump Stations 87498 United States Postal Service 5,000.00 Postage 87499 V&A Consulting Engineers 4,799.19 Professional Services-SP-68-1 87500 Verizon California 784.97 Telephone Services 87501 Verizon Wireless 427.10 Wireless Telephone Services 87502 Village Nurseries 144.37 Landscaping Supplies 87503 Vertex Corp. 609.22 Gate Repairs 87504 VWR Scientific Products 3,329.16 Lab Parts&Supplies 87505 Wastewater Technology Trainers 2,140.00 Training Registration 87506 WateReuse Association 275.00 Meeting Registration-Division 631 87507 Waters Corporation 5,223.60 Lab Parts&Supplies 87508 WEF 588.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 87509 West Coast Analytical Service,Inc. 330.00 Outside Lab Services 87510 West Lite Supply Company,Inc. 995.77 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87511 Weston Solutions,Inc. 1,550.00 Outside Laboratory Services-Core Ocean Monitoring Program 87512 Xerox Corporation 1,684.82 Copier Leases&Managed Services 87513 Michael J.Barrett 130.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87514 Joseph W. Park,Jr. 66.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87515 Pierre Wong 35.75 MeetinglTraining Expense Reimbursement 87516 County of Orange Auditor Controller 945.00 Administrative Fee-Adjustments to Property Tax Bills 87517 Orange County Sanitation District 16,669.64 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 87518 State Water Resources Control Board 569.00 Processing Fee-Construction Storm Water Notice of Intent(NOI)P2-90 Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 11,523,565.58 Payroll Disbursements 35758 - 35846 Employee Paychecks $ 126,071.90 Biweekly Payroll 01/03/07 35848 - 35979 Employee Paychecks 211,065.97 Interim Payroll,Leave Payouts,(2)Retirements&Annual BOP Payments' 135129 -135697 Direct Deposit Statements 1,147,507.19 Biweekly Payroll 01/03/07 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,484,645.06 'Check No.35847 was printed out of order on 12/29/06 due to the printing of biweekly payroll checks for pay date of 01/03/07. Wire Transfer Payments OCSD Payroll Taxes&Contributions $ 662,402.94 Biweekly Payroll 01/03/07 Deutsche Bank 547,989.42 Series 2006 Certificates of Participation December Interest Payment Bank of New York 122,360.00 Series 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation December Swap&Interest Payment Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 1,332,752.36 Total Claims Paid 01/01/07-01/15/07 $ 14,340,963.00 H:\dep0asd\EXCEL.dta\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\2007\Cfaims Paid Report-01.15.07 EXHIBIT A fin/210/1c Page 6 of 6 1/24/2007 Claims Paid From 01/16107 to 01/31/07 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable•Warrants 87519 Blue Cross of California $ 409,450.42 Medical Insurance Premium 87520 Carollo Engineers 214,131.34 Professional Services P2-66 87521 Delta Dental 58,345.41 Dental Insurance Plan 87522 Ecology Control Industries 54,609.28 Grit&Screening Disposal 87523 Hill Brothers 26,356.46 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 87524 Innerline Engineering 32,505.69 Sewerline Video Inspections 87525 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 66,109.68 Medical Insurance Premium 87526 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 75,360.00 Construction-Manhole Rehabilitation Project 87527 Weston Solutions,Inc. 47,500.00 Outside Laboratory Services-Core Ocean Monitoring Program 87528 AK Siewers 255.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 87529 Albert Grover&Associates 5,165.00 Professional Services-Traffic Impact Analysis 1-24 87530 American Express 15,265,67 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 87531 American Water Works Assoc./Water Quality 495.00 Meeting Registration-Division 820 87532 AppleOne Employment Service 13,674.53 Temporary Employment Services 87533 Aquatic Bioassay and Consulting Labs,Inc. 3,200.00 Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing 87534 Arch Wireless Operating Company,Inc. 937.79 Wireless Services 87535 Arizona Instrument 1,223.51 Instrument Repairs&Calibration Service 87536 AT&T California/MCI 181.25 Telephone Service 87537 Brea Community Hospital 1,130.03 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87538 Bristol Industries 2.511.78 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87539 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 26.94 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87540 BioMerieux Vitek,Inc. 584.10 Lab Parts&Supplies 87541 Cempi Industries 388.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87542 California Barricade Rentals 166.16 Barricade Rentals 87543 California Dept.of Child Support 1,240.12 Wage Garnishment 87544 California Fleet News 305.00 Books&Publications 87545 Cameron Compression Systems 348.58 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87546 CEM Corporation 4,557.36 Repair&Maintenance Services-Microwave Unit 87547 CMAA 85.00 Training Registration 87548 CNK Capital DBA Santa Ana Plating 1,315.77 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87549 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 2,291.12 Computer Batteries Maintenance Agreement 87550 Consolidated Electrical Distributors,Inc. 235.00 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87551 Corporate Express 608.49 Office Supplies 87552 County of Orange Auditor Controller 576.00 Cross Connection Inspection Fees 87553 County Wholesale Electric Co. 500.87 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87554 CR&R,Inc. 945.00 Container Rentals&Waste Disposal Service 87555 CSI Services,Inc. 5,227.16 Professional Services-Corrosion Inspection 87556 CWEA Annual Conference 360.00 Training Registration(California Water Environment Association) 87557 CWEA Membership 330.00 Membership(Calif.Water Environment Assoc.) 87558 Data Aire,Inc. 2,663.55 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87559 David's Tree Service 7,700.00 Tree Maint.Service 87560 Document Imaging Technologies 4,094.57 Scanning to Electronic Media Services-Time Sheets&Payroll Records 87561 Dun&Bradstreet,Inc. 10,624.00 Reporting Services-Capital Improvement Program Bidder Responsibility Evaluation 87562 Eagle Protection of California 275.00 Bldg.Security Alarm Services-No.County Yard 87563 Eldridge Products 480.00 Instrument Repair&Maintenance Services 87564 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 9,504.50 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 87565 Environmental Compliance Inspection Svce. 1,620.00 Professional Services-Fats,Oil Grease(FOG Program)Inspections 87566 Environmental Resource Associates 1,527.54 Lab Parts&Supplies H ldept%ascREXCEL.dtal220WPSHARESCIaims Paid Report120071CIaims Paid Report-01-31-07 EXHIBIT B finntonc Page 1 of 10 2115/2007 Claims Paid From 01/16/07 to 01/31107 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87567 Farwest Corrosion Control Co. 717.44 Corrosion Control Supplies-Paint,Adhesives,Magnesium Anodes 87568 FEDEX Corporation 80.66 Freight Services 87569 Forkert Engineering&Surveying,Inc. 1,113.26 Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 87570 Franchise Tax Board 90.00 Wage Garnishment 87571 Franklin Covey 397.15 Office Supplies 87572 Frasco Profiles 825.50 Human Resources Background Checks 87573 Frys Electronics 14.21 Computer Supplies 87574 Getinge Castle 1,183.50 Lab Maintenance Agreement-Autoclaves 87575 Government Finance Officers Association 2,119.50 Meeting Registration-Division 220 87576 Green Parrot 115.83 Meeting Supplies 87577 Hach do Portion Industries 4,975.23 Instrument Parts&Supplies 87578 Home Depot 623.39 Misc.Repair&Maintenance Material 87579 City of Huntington Beach 26.80 Water Use 87580 Ideal Uniform Rental 2,265.21 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87581 Internal Revenue Service 320.00 Wage Garnishment 87582 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL CIO Local 501 4,610.33 Dues Deduction 87583 Irvine Ranch Water District 6.75 Water Use 87584 JG Tucker and Son.Inc. 842.78 Repair,Maintenance&Recertification Services-SALA Lift,II Winch 87585 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 19,998.00 Repair&Maint.Svrs.-Clear Access Roads at Manholes on SARI Easement&Splitter Box Inlet Gate 87586 Lam-Plate Tech,Inc. 134.59 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87587 Court Order 150.00 Wage Gamishment 87588 EMT and Manager Training 10,000.00 EMT&Management Training Program-Profession of Management 87589 M.S.Bellows 958.98 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87590 Marine Technology Network Association 75.00 Membership 87591 Monster,Inc. 4,666.68 Notices&Ads 87592 Court Order 225.00 Wage Garnishment 87593 Morton Salt 1,368.51 Salt 87594 National Bond&Trust 2,856.67 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 87595 National Plant Services,Inc. 460.00 Vacuum Truck Services 87596 O C Tanner Recognition Company 1,014.69 Employee Service Awards Program 87597 OCB Reprographics 22,293.16 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 87598 OCEA 610.78 Dues Deduction 87599 Office Depot Business Services Division 1,376.59 Office Supplies 87600 Oxygen Service Company 1,950.57 Specialty Gases and Lab Parts&Supplies 87601 Patio&Door Outlet,Inc. 686.31 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87602 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,584.00 Dues Deduction,Supervisors&Professionals 87603 Port Supply 81.01 Repair&Maintenance Materials 87604 Praxair,Inc. 43.23 Lab Parts&Supplies 87605 Prudential Insurance Company of America 2,490.55 Employee Voluntary Long-Term Care Insurance 87606 Prudential Overall Supply 3,013.52 Uniforms&Related Articles 87607 Rockwell Engineering&Equipment Co. 689.84 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87608 South Coast Environmental Co. 1,603.10 Air Quality Monitoring 87609 Science Applications International 19,014.40 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 87610 Scott Specialty Gases,Inc. 80.16 Demurrage 87611 Sea Bird Electronics,Inc. 1,094.00 Lab Instrument Maintenance&Calibration Services-Profiling Equipment 87612 Sewer Equipment Company of America 164.00 Hose Guides 87613 So Cal Gas Company 21,023.07 Natural Gas 87614 Society of Environmental Toxicology&Chemistry 160.00 Membership 87615 Southern Counties Oil Co. 14,943.81 Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel H:ldeptlasdlEXCEL.dta12201APSHARE\Claims Paid Repor[QOGAClaims Paid Report-01-31-07 EXHIBIT B tin/210nc Page 2 of 10 2/1512007 Claims Paid From 01/16107 to 01/31107 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87616 Sparling Instruments,Inc. 250.00 Calibration of Ocean Outfall Flow Meter 87617 State Board of Equalization 230.73 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Maintenance Fee 87618 Technical Service Group,Inc. 1,381.60 SCADA System VAX Service Agreement 87619 Systems Solution Company 1,962.75 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Access Control/CCTV Security System 87620 The Orange County Register 4,791.60 Notices&Ads 87621 The Walking Man,Inc. 425.00 Printing&Distribution for Various Construction Projects 87622 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 103.72 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87623 Times Community News 50.00 Notices&Ads 87624 T-Mobile 105.10 Wireless Air Time 87625 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 82.00 Locks&Keys 87626 Traffic Control Service,Inc. 224.41 Traffic Safety Supplies/Rentals 87627 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 17,233.76 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 87628 US Bank 4,335.07 Annual Administrative Fee Re 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation 87629 UC Regents 5,577.82 Professional Services-Strategic Process Study Research Project 87630 Underground Service Alert of So.Calif 1,305.60 Membership-Underground Utility Identification/Dig Alert Notification Service 87631 United Pacific Services,Inc. 575.00 Tree Maintenance Services at Plt.2 87632 United Parcel Service 134.51 Parcel Services 87633 United Way 60.00 Employee Contributions 87634 Velie Circuits,Inc. 2,472.02 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87635 Verizon California 151.76 Telephone Services 87636 Vision Service Plan CA 9,907.92 Vision Service Premium 87637 The Wackenhut Corporation 16,200.34 Security Guards 87638 Wastewater Technology Trainers 1,445.00 Training Registration 87639 WEF 576.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 87640 Western States Controls 62.42 Instrument Parts&Supplies 87641 Xyon Business Solutions,Inc. 1,440.00 Temporary Employment Services 87642 Court Order 597.50 Wage Garnishment 87643 Layne T.Baroldi 300.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87644 Brian Bingman 125.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87645 John Dullaghan 16.00 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 87646 Kimberly A.Erickson 42.72 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87647 Charles E.Frey 62.03 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87648 Michelle R.Hetherington 310.16 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87649 Thomas J.Mendez 130.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87650 James D.Niswonger 785.25 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87651 Matthew P.Smith 242.96 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87652 Paul Ward 195.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87653 Simon L.Watson 1,440.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87654 Marie C.Martin 1,033.03 Employee Computer Loan Program 87655 SARBS 1,875.00 Training Registration 87656 Air Products&Chemicals 25,829.07 O&M Agreement Oxy.Gen.Sys.MO 8-9-89 87657 Basic Chemical Solutions,L.L.C. 26,295.06 Sodium Bisulfite&Sodium Hydroxide 87658 Black&Veatch Corporation 221,393.80 Engineering Services-P1-102&J-77 87659 Brown&Caldwell 64,069.15 Professional Services P2-91 87660 Camp Dresser&Mckee,Inc. 206,455.60 Engineering Service J-71-8,J-47&P1-97 87661 Carotlo Engineers 215,668.73 Professional Services P2-66 87662 City of Fountain Valley 39,152.01 Water Use 87663 Earth Tech,Inc. 27,81421 Professional Services 3-58 87664 Kemira Water Solutions,Inc. 109,487.79 Ferric Chloride H Weptlasd\EXCEL.dta1220WPSHARESClaims Paid Report\20071Claims Paid Report-01-31-07 EXHIBIT B rinnlonc Page 3 of 10 2/15/2007 Claims Paid From 01116/07 to 01/31/07 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87665 Malcolm Pimie,Inc. 156,044.76 Professional Services 1-2-4,J-79&5-50 87666 Occidental Energy Marketing,Inc. 67,654.29 Natural Gas for CenGen/CoGen 87667 Orange County Water District 557,167.85 Joint GWRS Project J-36 87668 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 237,872.44 Sodium Hypochlorite 87669 Polydyne,Inc. 37,091.35 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 87670 Southern California Edison 2,885,061.31 Power 87671 Summit Consulting International 26,898.00 Legal Services 7-36,7-41 &1-24 87672 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 225,791.50 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 87673 US Peroxide,L.L.C. 148,721.41 Odor&Corrosion Control Treatment for Coll.Sys.; Hydrogen Peroxide&Ferrous Chloride 87674 Barnard Soletanche Joint Venture 2,554,785.00 Construction I-10A 87675 California Business Bank 87,438.96 Construction I-2-4A,Retention 87676 Mike Bubalo Construction Co.,Inc. 786,950.63 Construction 1-24A 87677 Steve P.Rados,Inc. 642,686.06 Construction 1-2-4 87678 Union Bank of California 71,409.56 Construction 1-24,Retention 87679 Morrow Meadows Corp. 406,996.00 Construction P2-47-3 87680 A W Chesterton 6,241.68 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87681 Aanderaa Instruments 348.38 Freight Charges 87682 Absolute Standards,Inc. 501.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 87683 Accounting Options,Inc. 3,407.25 Temporary Employment Services 87684 ACCU Sludge 462.31 Lab Parts&Supplies 87685 AccuStandard 155.09 Lab Parts&Supplies 87686 Adamson Industries 292.22 Lab Parts&Supplies 87687 Agilent Technologies,Inc. 3.258.44 Lab Parts&Supplies 87688 AGX CORPORATION 612.77 Valve 87689 AIHI 178.00 Membership 87690 Airgas Safety,Inc. 3,805.38 Safety Supplies 87691 Allied Electronics,Inc. 565.48 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87692 Alternative Fuel Vehicle Institute 897.00 Meeting Registration-Divisions 431&434 87693 American Chemical Society 146.00 Membership 87694 American Machinery&Blade,Inc. 302.82 Punch&Die Sets 87695 American Red Cross 70.00 CPR Training&Miscellaneous Supplies 87696 American Seals West 107.17 Gaskets 87697 Analytical Products Group,Inc. 695.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 87698 Applied Industrial Technology 6.21 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87699 Aquatic Bioassay and Consulting Labs,Inc. 785.00 Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing 87700 ARB/PERP-Air Resources Board 810.00 Portable Equipment Registration Program 87701 ARGOS Technologies,Inc. 92.28 Lab Parts&Supplies 87702 ASCE Continuing Education 2,510.00 Meeting Registration 87703 ASMS Conference 65.00 Membership 87704 AT&T Universal Biller 1,515.64 Telephone Service 87705 AT&T California/MCI 2,083.22 Telephone Service 87706 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 6.12 Telephone Service 87707 Atkinson,Andelson,Loya,Rudd&Ruud 6,267.40 Legal Services 87708 Battery Specialties 146.11 Batteries 87709 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 24.76 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87710 BMC Business Machines Consultants,Inc. 90.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-Cassette Tray 87711 Boyle Engineering Corporation 2,361.89 Professional Services 1-24 87712 Bucknam&Associates,Inc. 560.00 Professional Services-Pavement Management 87713 C&D Technologies 4,499.37 Flashlights&Batteries-Magnetic H:tdeptlasdlEXCEL.dta1220V+PSHARE%Ctaims Paid ReporR200710aims Paid Report-0131.07 EXHIBIT B fin1210Ac Page 4 of 10 211 5/2007 Claims Paid From 01116107 to 01131/07 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87714 County of Orange 149.21 Maint.Agreement-Repair/Installation of Base,Handheld&Vehicle Radios 87715 California Municipal Revenue&Tax Assoc. 50.00 Membership 87716 Cambridge Isotope Labs 585.18 Lab Parts&Supplies 87717 Careers In Government,Inc. 1,200.00 Notices&Ads 87718 CCG Systems,Inc. 9,250.00 Fleet Maintenance Software 87719 CHMIA 50.00 Membership-Calif.Hazardous Materials Investigators Assoc. 87720 Cingular Wireless Airtime 4,859.79 Wireless Services 87721 CMAA 85.00 Training Registration 87722 Columbia Analytical Services,Inc. 870.00 Analysis of Wastewater,Industrial Wastewater&Biosolids 87723 Compressor Components of California 1,931.00 Repair&Maint.Svrs.-Gas Compressor Piston Assembly;Clean,Test&Recondition(24)Coils 87724 Consolidated Electrical Distributors,Inc. 887.93 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87725 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 515.83 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 87726 Control Techniques 615.06 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87727 Corporate Express 739.02 Office Supplies 87728 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 2.750.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87729 County of Orange Health Care Agency 1,087.50 Containment Soils Inspection 87730 CRC Press,Inc. 16.74 Books&Publications 87731 CWEA Annual Conference 395.00 Meeting Registration-Division 820 87732 CWEA Membership 220.00 Membership(Calif.Water Environment Assoc.) 87733 DIRECTV 311.72 Subscription 87734 Dunn Edwards Corporation 161.63 Paint Supplies 87735 Ecology Control Industries 8,218.19 Grit&Screening Disposal 87736 Electrical Reliability Services 3,000.00 Professional Services-Electrical Reliability Testing for Capital Projects 87737 Enchanter,Inc. 4,200.00 Ocean Monitoring&Outfall Inspection&Maintenance 87738 Entech Instruments,Inc. 171.16 Lab Parts&Supplies 87739 Everpure Water Solutions,Inc. 4,807.61 Pump and Pump Parts&Supplies 87740 Ewing Irrigation Industrial 1,549.11 Landscape Irrigation Parts&Supplies 87741 Expertune 900.00 Software Maintenance 87742 Express Lens Lab 1,984.84 Safety Glasses 87743 Filter Belts,Inc. 7,000.00 Filter Press Belts 87744 Fine Science Tools,Inc 143.11 Lab Parts&Supplies 87745 Fisher Scientific 7,152.55 Lab Parts&Supplies 87746 Five Star Metals,Inc. 1,125.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87747 Flo Systems,Inc. 442.48 Pump Parts&Supplies 87748 FLW,Inc. 390.71 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 87749 Forensic Analytical Specialties 20.00 Asbestos Analyses&Microscopy 87750 Forestry Suppliers 97.46 Lab Parts&Supplies 87751 Forkert Engineering&Surveying,Inc. 665.89 Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 87752 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 308.43 Paint Supplies 87753 George T.Hall 876.22 Actuator 87754 Global Awards,Inc. 1,465.15 Stainless Steel&Plastic Asset Tags 87755 Grainger,Inc. 3,490.91 Air Compressor 87756 Graphics Press,L.L.C. 720.00 Training Registration 87757 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 20.90 Janitorial Supplies 87758 Green Parrot 97.99 Meeting Supplies 87759 Guarantee Records Management 499.64 Off-Site Records Storage 87760 Hach c/o Portion Industries 876.70 Lab Parts&Supplies 87761 Harold Primrose Ice 70.00 Ice For Samples 87762 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 181.74 Mechanical Parts&Supplies H.kdepltasMEXCEL.dta4220%APSHARE1Claims Paid Reportt2007lClaims Paid Report-01-31-07 EXHIBIT B fin21011c Page 5 of 10 2/15l2007 Claims Paid From 01/16/07 to 01/31/07 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87763 Hill Brothers 14,195.11 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunktine 87764 Home Depot 160.25 Misc.Repair&Maintenance Material 87765 Hummingbird Communications Ltd 909.69 Software Maint. 87766 Industrial Distribution Group 125.33 Tools&Paint 87767 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 1,171.19 Lab Parts&Supplies 87768 Inspection Technologies,Inc. 89.24 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87769 Ironman Parts&Services 155.90 Natural Gas Filters-Cen Gen Engines 87770 Irvine Ranch Water District 29.27 Water Use 87771 J R Filanc Construction 10,293.16 Repair&Maintenance Services-Remove/Replace Supply&Return Lines-Admin.Bldg.Hot Water Loop 87772 Johnstone Supply 85.71 Pump Parts 87773 Kabob Express 133.14 Meeting Expenses 87774 Kaman Industrial Technologies 1,714.87 Polymer Chain 87775 Kforce,Inc. 686.40 Temporary Employment Services 87776 Kleinfelder,Inc. 13,345.75 Soils,Concrete&Other Materials Testing 87777 Lee&Ro,Inc. 1,594.14 Professional Services P247-3 87778 Lexis Nexis Matthew Bender 194.50 Books&Publications 87779 Lorman Education Services 369.00 Training Registration 87780 Marinus Scientific 99.13 Lab Parts&Supplies 87781 Master Protection Corp.DBA FireMaster 3,157.51 Fire Extinguisher Supplies&Services 87782 Matrix Technology Solutions,Inc. 14,000.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-Leak Repair&Pressure Testing 87783 Maureen Kane&Associates 1.000.00 Training Registration 87784 McGraw Hill Company 234.77 Books&Publications 87785 McMaster Carr Supply Co. 1,207.14 Mechanical&Lab Parts,Supplies&Tools 87786 Medlin Controls Co. 473.12 Instrument Parts&Supplies 87787 Mesa Consolidated Water District 41.79 Water Use 87788 Mid West Associates 421.32 Pump Parts&Supplies 87789 Miller Brooks Environmental,Inc. 24,133.63 Professional Services-UST Feasibility Study&Corrective Action Plan 87790 Motion Industries,Inc. 489.64 Safety Supplies 87791 National Institute of Standards&Technology 551.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 87792 Neutron Products,Inc. 11,767.60 Anionic Polymer 87793 Newark Electronics 415.29 Instrument Parts&Supplies 87794 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 4,303.00 Professional Services-Soils,Concrete&Other Materials Testing for Various Capital Projects 87795 Norcal Controls Incorporated 230.82 Instrument Parts&Supplies 87796 The Norco Companies 349.44 Mail Delivery Service 87797 Office Depot Business Services Division 1,664.54 Office Supplies 87798 Onesource Distributors,Inc. 7,796.87 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87799 Orange County Industrial Plastics 2,715.30 Plastic Sheets 87800 Orange County Vector Control District 669.71 Pest Control 87801 Oxygen Service Company 20.26 Specialty Gases 87802 Pacific Mechanical Supply 2,573.93 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 87803 Payne and Fears,L.L.P. 117.50 Legal Services 87804 PCS Express,Inc. 122.00 Courier Service 87805 Platinum Advisors 5,000.00 Legislative Advocacy Efforts&Participation in Legislative Affairs Committee Meetings 87806 Praxair,Inc. 369.59 Lab Parts&Supplies 87807 Primavera Systems,Inc. 3,790.00 Training Registration 87808 Prudential Overall Supply 1,748.85 Uniforms&Related Articles 87809 Pump Engineering 62.33 Pump Parts&Supplies 87810 Restek Corporation 602.51 Lab Parts&Supplies 87811 Rockwell Engineering&Equipment Co. 6,292.60 Pump Parts&Supplies H%deptlasMEXCEL.dra4220WPSHARE1Claims Paid Reportk20071C1aims Paid Report-01-31-07 EXHIBIT B fin/21011c Page 6 of 10 211512007 v, q A Claims Paid From 01/16/07 to 01/31107 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87812 Rolls Royce Energy Systems,Inc. 370.66 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87813 RPM Electric Motors 1,704.73 Motor Repairs 87814 RTM Lighting&Electronics,Inc. 188.34 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87815 Melinda S.Sargent 691.29 Insurance Premiums Refund 87816 SCESA 50.00 Membership 87817 Schwing Bioset 6.36 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87818 Scott&Whitehead 858.08 Legal Services-Labor,Employee Relations&Representation 87819 City of Seal Beach Finance Dept. 206.85 Water Use 87820 SGS Testcom,Inc. 3.81 Telephone Line-District Vehicle SMOG Station 87821 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 281.32 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Tools 87822 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,494.60 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87823 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. 555.75 Service Agreement-DI Water Systems at Plants 1&2 87824 SKC West,Inc. 129.30 Calibration of Noise Meters 87825 Southern Counties Lubricants 2,060.19 Oil 87826 Sparkletts 1,751.94 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 87827 Sparling Instruments,Inc. 4,491.24 Instrument Parts&Supplies 87828 Stanley Steamer International,Inc. 637.50 Carpet&Furniture Cleaning 87829 Summit Steel 3,017.00 Metal 87830 Support Products Engineering 114.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87831 TekSystems 15,021.50 Temporary Employment Services 87832 Testamerica Ontario 1,806.00 Analysis of Biosolids 87833 The Rochester Corporation 595.00 Instrument Parts&Supplies 87834 Thermo Electron Corp. 845.28 Lab Parts&Supplies 87835 Thomas V.Gerlinger 1.500.00 Lab Analyses 87836 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 10,815.13 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87837 Toshiba International Corp. 1,754.87 Instrument Parts&Supplies 87838 Townsend Public Affairs 5,000.00 Legislative&Executive Advocate for Grant Funding 87839 UC Regents 575.00 Training Registration 87840 United Parcel Service 121.11 Parcel Services 67841 Varian,Inc. 1,942.62 Lab Parts&Supplies 87842 Verizon California 111.95 Telephone Services 87843 VWR Scientific Products 7,847.94 Lab Parts&Supplies 87844 Wallingford Software,Inc. 7,694.97 Software Maintenance&Technical Support-InfoWorks Viewer 87845 Wally Machinery And Tool Supply,Inc. 155.16 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Tools 87846 Waxie Sanitary Supply 422.85 Janitorial Supplies 87847 WEF 445.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 87848 West Lite Supply Company,Inc. 999.38 Electrical Parts&Supplies 87849 Yale/Chase Materials Handling,Inc. 281.08 Electric Cart Parts 87850 Yardley-Zaretsky,Inc. 2.550.00 Professional Services 131-110 87851 James L.Burror 182.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87852 Philip F.Cordova 12.61 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87853 Carla D.Dillon 55.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87854 Mark A.Esquer 66.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87855 Randy E.Harris 61.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87856 Edmund L.Pendleton 12.80 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87857 J R Filanc Construction 9,127.90 Construction FE05-19 87858 J F Shea Construction,Inc. 23,470.86 Construction P2-90A 87859 Orange County Sanitation District 1,327.33 Petty Cash Reimb. 87860 SARBS 375.00 Training Registration H.ldept%asdtEXCEL.dta1220WPSHAREIClaims Paid Report12007TIaims Paid Report•01-31.07 EXHIBIT B ON2IOnc Page 7 of 10 2/15/2007 Claims Paid From 01116/07 to 01131107 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87861 Business Objects Americas 39,396.98 Software Maintenance&Support 87862 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 33,750.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 87863 Forkert Engineering&Surveying,Inc. 38,922.10 Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 87864 Innerline Engineering 27,891.05 Sewerline Video Inspections 87865 IPMC do Parsons 1,223,793.00 Engineering Services-Integrated Program/Project Management,Temporary Staffing,Mat'l.&Supplies 87866 Morrow Meadows Corp. 159,774.00 Construction FE02-59&FE02-60 87867 Southern California Edison 81,720.37 Power 87868 Woodruff Spradlin&Smart 75,018.14 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 87869 American Fidelity Assurance Company 486.40 Employee Voluntary Cancer Insurance 87870 Amtech Elevator Services 1,400.00 Monthly Elevator Maintenance at Plts. 1 &2 87871 AT&T Universal Biller 965.25 Telephone Service 87872 AT&T California/MCI 46.84 Telephone Service 87873 Bee Man Pest Control,Inc. 175.00 Pest Control 87874 Black&Veatch Corporation 18,000.00 Engineering Services-Corrosion&General Inspection of Outfall Pipe&Appurtenances 87875 Brady Worldwide, Inc. 333.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-Powermark Printer 87876 Brenntag Pacific,Inc. 1,325.07 Chemicals 87877 Bush&Associates,Inc. 5,652.00 Surveying Services 5-62 87878 California Barricade Rentals 2,455.00 Barricade Rentals 87879 Cingular Wireless Airtime 387.15 Wireless Services 87880 City of Newport Beach 1,200.00 Newport Harbor Annual Mooring Fees-Nerissa Ocean Monitoring Vessel 87881 CMAA 535.00 Training Registration 87882 Compressor Components of California 1,790.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-LSVB Engine Pilot Fuel Passages 87883 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 41.25 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 87884 Corporate Express 240.62 Office Supplies 87885 County of Orange Auditor Controller 361.70 Encroachment Permit 3-52 87886 Culligan of Orange County 51.90 Maint.Agreement-Cen Gen Water Softener System 87887 CWEA Annual Conference 2,255.00 Training Reg.(California Water Environment Assoc.)&Meeting Reg.Divs.240,420,&631 87888 CWEA Membership 330.00 Membership(Calif.Water Environment Assoc.) 87889 D.R.McNatty&Associates 18,029.81 Software User Licenses,Maintenance&Support-Primavera 87890 David's Tree Service 350.00 Tree Maint.Service 87891 Diamond Interiors,Inc. 1,827.00 RepaiUReplace Mini Blinds at Administration Bldg.-(7)Areas 87892 Dunn Edwards Corporation 325.07 Paint Supplies 87893 Earth Tech,Inc. 3,227.87 Professional Services P1-106 87894 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 9,392.96 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 87895 ENS Resources,Inc. 10,000.00 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 87896 Environmental Support Solutions 2,158.00 Software Maintenance&Support-Safety Management 87897 Ewing Irrigation Industrial 217.01 Landscape Irrigation Parts&Supplies 87898 FEDEX Corporation 57.16 Freight Services 87899 First American Real Estate Solutions 802.00 On-Line Orange County Property Information 87900 Fountain Valley Rancho Hand Wash 731.99 Vehicle Washing&Waxing Services 87901 Franchise Tax Board 90.00 Wage Garnishment 87902 Franklin Covey 62.60 Office Supplies 87903 Frys Electronics 183.11 Computer Supplies 87904 Garland Manufacturing Co. 694.18 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87905 Gates Fiberglass Installers 1,523.25 Repair and Replace Fiberglass 87906 Giedich Mitchell,Inc. 222.37 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 87907 Goldenwest Window Service 820.00 Roof Cleaning&Maintenance at Pit.1 87908 Google,Inc. 6,300.00 Software Licenses-Google Earth Pro 87909 Hewlett Packard Company 835.06 (5)HP Docking Stations H:1dep11asd1EXCEL.dta\220VAPSHAREIClaims Paid Report120071Ctaims Paid Report-01.31-07 EXHIBIT B finrz1011c Page 8 of 10 2r15r2oo7 Claims Paid From 01/16107 to 01/31/07 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87910 Home Depot 192.77 Misc.Repair&Maintenance Material 87911 City of Huntington Beach 13,818.71 Water Use 87912 IBM Corp. 5,584.77 Prof.Services-Network Programming 87913 Internal Revenue Service 320.00 Wage Garnishment 87914 International Risk Management Inst. 2.445.25 Annual Subscription Renewal 87915 Iron Mountain 105.00 Storage Fee-Bid Documents P1-37 87916 Kabob Express 138.53 Meeting Expenses 87917 Leybold Vacuum Products,Inc. 224.59 Lab Parts&Supplies 87918 National Bond&Trust 2,856.67 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 87919 National Plant Services,Inc. 2.643.13 Sewerline Video Inspections&Vacuum Truck Services 87920 New Brunswick Scientific 399.75 Repair&Maintenance Services-Lab Instrument 87921 New Hermes,Inc. 259.58 Engraving Supplies 87922 OCEA 620.03 Dues Deduction 87923 Office Depot Business Services Division 772.37 Office Supplies 87924 Orange County Chapter-ISCEBS 60.00 Meeting Registration-Division 240 87925 Orange County Hose Company 26.98 Hydraulic Hose Supplies&Parts 87926 Orange County Plating Co.,Inc. 736.20 Pump Repairs 87927 Oxygen Service Company 1,521.43 Specialty Gases or Lab Parts&Supplies 87928 PCG Industries 1,100.00 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Repairs 87929 Procare Work Injury Center 985.00 Medical Screenings 87930 Q Air-Calif.Div.Pump Engineering 232.50 Professional Services-Troubleshooting 87931 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,897.37 Trash Removal 87932 Riliability Center,Inc. 2,595.00 Training Registration 87933 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 6,917.50 Engineering Services-Repair of 66"&84"Interplant Lines 87934 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 23,785.00 Construction-Manhole Rehab.Project 87935 SBC Long Distance-Southwestern Bell 1.108.15 Telephone Services 87936 Scottel Voice&Data,Inc. 2,284.79 Telephone System Maintenance 87937 Southern California Edison 329.58 Power 87938 Systime Computer Corp. 3,480.00 Professional Services-OneWorld XE SP22-F1 System Upgrade 87939 The Help Center,L.L.C. 11,000.00 On-Site Training-Diversity Training 87940 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 646.79 Motor 87941 Time Warner Communication 51.07 Cable Services 87942 Todd Painting, Inc. 1,350.00 Painting Services 87943 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 454.33 Locks&Keys 87944 Tortuga Pool Services 310.00 Maintenance Agreement-Weekly Cleaning of Atrium Pond 87945 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 84.78 Automotive Parts&Supplies 87946 United Parcel Service 1,095.10 Parcel Services 87947 United Way 60.00 Employee Contributions 87948 USFilter Westates Carbon 4.196.01 Repair&Maintenance Services-Carbon Filter 87949 Verizon Wireless 304.14 Wireless Telephone Services 87950 Vernes Plumbing 60.00 Service Contract-Testing&Cert.Backflow Devices at Pits.1&2&Pump Sta. 87951 Village Nurseries 96.78 Landscaping Supplies 87952 Vortex Corp. 5,347.08 Door or Gate Repairs Various Plant 1 Locations 87953 WateReuse Association 7,000.00 2007 Subscriber Fees 87954 WEF 154.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 87955 Workforce Software,Inc. 350.00 Time&Attendance Software 87956 Xerox Corporation 20,040.00 Copier Leases&Managed Services 87957 1-800-Conference(R) 161.83 Telephone Conference Calls 87958 David M.Chafe 42.20 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement H ldeptlasd\EXCEL.dla\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report12007tClaims Paid Report-01-31.07 EXHIBIT 8 fin/210/1c Page 9 of 10 2/1512007 Claims Paid From 01/16/07 to 01/31107 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 87959 Chloe D.Dao 290.04 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87960 Thomas D.Dodderer 61.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87961 Victoria L.Francis 61.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87962 Robert P.Ghirelli 169.82 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87963 Michael I.Gold 660.88 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87964 Chandra R.Johannesson 225.00 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement 87965 Pamela A.Koester 199.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87966 Henry E.Lorimer 8.54 Meetingffraining Expense Reimbursement 87967 Curtis R.Mason 17.17 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87968 Donald D.Simpson 42.68 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87969 Frank r.Steiger 125.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87970 Marco Polo S.Velasco 272.14 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87971 Tadeo G.Vitko 325.33 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87972 Paula A.Zeller 311.13 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 87973 Amel Commercial Properties 21,414.67 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87974 California Career School 823.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87975 Carson Estate Company 959.81 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87976 County of Orange Auditor Controller 615.00 Administrative Fee-Adjustments to Property Tax Bills 87977 County of Orange Auditor Controller 780.00 Administrative Fee-Adjustments to Property Tax Bills 87978 County of Orange Auditor Controller 780.00 Administrative Fee-Adjustments to Property Tax Bills 87979 Daleo Enterprises 466.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87980 Lui,L.L.C. 860.93 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87981 M&B Enterprises,L.L.C. 1,219.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87982 Vernon Monroe 976.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87983 Regency Center,Limited Partnership 5,888.98 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87984 Rexco.L.L.C. 712.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87985 Southside Investment Company 246.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87986 Martha Velastegui 431.45 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 87987 Warfand Investments Co. 6,086.24 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 13.478.060.96 Payroll Disbursements 35980 - 36050 Employee Paychecks $ 130,802.69 Biweekly Payroll-01/17/07 36051 - 36059 Employee Paychecks 28,754.56 Interim Payroll-Void,Correction,Retirement&Resignation 01/16/07-01/25/07 36060 - 36129 Employee Paychecks 127,302.25 Biweekly Payroll-01/31/07 36130 - 36137 Employee Paychecks 6,850.98 Interim Payroll-Retirement&Retros 01/31/07 135698 - 136822 Direct Deposit Statements 2,458,427.45 Biweekly Payroll-01/17/07&01/31/07 Total Payroll Disbursements _$ 2,752,137.93 Wire Transfer Payments OCSD Payroll Taxes&Contributions $ 1,562,092.09 Biweekly Payroll 01/17/07&01/31/07 Union Bank of California 6,428,539.20 Series 2003A COPs January Interest Payment US Bank 2,013,240.24 Series 1990-92 Advance Refunding COPS January Principal&Interest Payment Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 10,003,871.53 Total Claims Paid 01/16106-01/31106 $ 26,234,070.42 RkdeptlasdlEXCEL,dta12201APSHARMlaims Paid Report1200710aims Paid Report-01-31-07 EXHIBIT B finfMft Page 10 of 10 V1512007 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 02/28/07 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 8(b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-61 — COWAN HEIGHTS ANNEXATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Authorize staff to annex 152.30 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the vicinity of Newport Boulevard, Rangeview Drive and Cowan Heights Drive, in an unincorporated area of Orange County; (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 07-02, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-61 — Cowan Heights Annexation); and (3) Defer collection of associated fees for proposed Annexation No. OCSD-61 — Cowan Heights Annexation until a sewer connection is permitted. SUMMARY • Staff is requesting to annex a total of 152.30 acres to OCSD. By annexing this entire area to OCSD, administrative cost per property owner will be reduced by approximately $4,000 when they connect to a public sewer in the future. • The 152 property owners in this annexation will pay their portion of the annexation and connection fees when they request a connection to the OCSD sewer facilities. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS Information presentations at the October 2006 and January 2007 Steering Committee meetings. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The proposed Annexation is in accordance with OCSD's policies and resolutions including payment of fees, CEQA requirements, and the preparation of the map and legal description. RLC:sa H:\ntglobakAgenda Draft Reports\Joint Boards\Cowan Heights Annex 022807.doc Form No.DW-102 Agenda Report—Board Revised: 12/06/06 Page 1 i BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 02/28/07 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number Orange County Sanitation District FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Ed Torres, P.E.. Director of Technical Services SUBJECT: Biosolids Management GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Consider and Approve an Addendum to the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for the 1999 Strategic Plan to comply with the Court of Appeal's holding in County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County v. County of Kern (2005). 2. Consider and Approve an Addendum to the 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR in conjunction with the Board's consideration and final approval of an "Agreement for the Management of Biosolids" with EnerTech Environmental California, LLC to manage biosolids at their facility in Rialto, California and an "Amendment No. 8 to an Agreement" with Synagro to manage biosolids at their facility at the South Kern County Industrial Center ("SKIC"). 3. Final Approval of the EnerTech Contract and Synagro Contract, the CEQA contingencies having been satisfied. SUMMARY • In 2005, the Court of Appeal in County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County v. County of Kern (CSD No. 2) held that the Orange County Sanitation District ("OCSD") was required to perform California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") review prior to entering into a biosolids management contract with Shane Magan for the land application of biosolids at Tule Ranch in Kern County in January, 2000 ("2000 Magan Contract"). • Pursuant to CEQA and in compliance with the CSD No. 2 holding, OCSD staff has prepared an Addendum to the 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR ("Biosolids Contracts Addendum"), which evaluates the environmental impacts of the 2000 Magan Contract. • In addition to evaluating the environmental impacts of the 2000 Magan Contract, the Biosolids Contracts Addendum evaluates the environmental impacts of two additional biosolids management contracts that the Board preliminarily approved earlier this year. The EnerTech Contract which requires EnerTech to transport and process biosolids at its facility in Rialto, California and the Synagro Contract which requires Synagro to transport and process biosolids at its new compositing facility in Kern County. Each of these contracts contained a provision that made OCSD's obligations to perform under the contracts contingent upon the successful completion of OCSD's environmental review of the proposed activities contemplated under the contracts pursuant to CEQA. • Upon the Board's approval of the Biosolids Contracts Addendum, the contingencies contained in the EnerTech and Synagro contracts will be satisfied and the District will be legally bound to perform its obligations under the contract. • The Board, as the lead agency and decision-making body for purposes of the District's biosolids management program, is required to consider the Biosolids Contracts Addendum Form No.DW-102 Agenda Report—Board Revised: 2-15-07 LB:wh H:\dept\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2007 Board Agenda Reports\0207\ltem 8(c).Biosolids.doc Page 1 along with the 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR and approve the Addendum prior to undertaking its obligations under the EnerTech and Synagro contracts. • As documented in the Biosolids Contracts Addendum, neither the 2000 Magan Contract. nor the EnerTech or Synagro contracts would result in any new environmental impacts. or a substantial increase in the severity of any environmental impacts that were previously analyzed and addressed in the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR. The Biosolids Contracts Addendum provides a "site specific" or "project level" analysis of the potential environmental impacts of hauling and processing biosolids at each of the facilities described in the three (3) contracts. • This item was previously scheduled to be acted upon by the Board at their December 20, 2006 Board meeting. Staff removed this item to address issues that were raised by Kern County just prior to the December Board meeting. These issues have been addressed to the satisfaction of staff and counsel. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS 1. April 2006 OMTS/Board: Approve Amendment Number 8 with Synagro West, Inc. 2. July 2005 OMTS/Board: Authorize the General Manager to enter into a contract with EnerTech Environmental, Inc. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Biosolids Management Report 2. Addendum to 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR 3. Response to Kern County letter Form No.Dw-102 Agenda Report—Board Revised: 2-15-07 LB:wh H:\dept\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2007 Board Agenda Report s\0207\Item B(c).Biosolids.doc Page 2 � G t 6AN1 TAr O� _ m o e 90j �GS FCrNG-7 THE E ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Biosolids Management Report ADDITIONAL INFORMATION These contracts required Tule Ranch, EnerTech, and Synagro to accept and process, for an agreed upon fee, a portion of the biosolids that OCSD generates at its treatment plant. Each contract essentially entails two components (1) biosolids hauling and (2) biosolids processing at the receiver site. The following additional specific information is provided for each of the three (3) biosolids contracts: a. 2000 Magan Contract The Board's approval of the 2000 Magan Contract superseded an earlier biosolids contract with Magan that the Board approved in 1996. OCSD actually began shipping biosolids to Tule Ranch in 1997 pursuant to the 1996 contract. The 2000 Magan Contract modified payment terms, but generally did not alter the obligations and duties of the parties relating to the hauling and land application of Class B biosolids at Tule Ranch. As noted in the Biosolids Contracts Addendum, based on a comparison of a two-year period before and a three-year period after the Board approved the 2000 Magan Contract, OCSD hauled an additional 26,650 Wet Tons Per Year("WTPY") of biosolids to Tule Ranch. This increase in biosolids production resulted in a corresponding increase of approximately 1,105 annual truck trips or approximately six (6) truck trips per day based on OCSD's typical five (5) day, Monday through Friday, hauling schedule. When the Board approved the 2000 Magan Contract, Mr. Magan was already accepting and land disposing biosolids at Tule Ranch pursuant to four (4) Regional Water Quality Control Board approvals (permits) issued in 1994 and 1996. These permits authorized the land application of biosolids on approximately 5,900 acres, including 4,100 acres in Kern County (Waste Discharge Requirements#94-253, Notice of Intent ("NOI") Identification Nos. 95-14046 and 95-14047) and another 1,800 acres in neighboring Kings County (NOI Identification No. 95- 14035). b. EnerTech Contract As a result of OCSD's Long-Range Biosolids Planning efforts, OCSD staff and its Biosolids Advisory Committee recommended that the Board award EnerTech a biosolids management contact. The Long-Range Plan looked at a variety of technologies and their respective markets to see which would be the most sustainable in the long-term based on a triple bottom line approach (economics, environmental, and societal criteria). EnerTech's proposal was found to be the best proposal matching for these criteria for OCSD's situation. OCSD ♦ P.O.Box 8127 ♦ Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 ♦ (714)962-2411 a This EnerTech Contract commits OCSD to pay a set price for EnerTech's services and a set amount of biosolids daily, but does not require OCSD to front any capital costs. EnerTech has coordinated venture capital money from private individuals as well as the State of California financing based on its renewable energy production. The proposed EnerTech Contract requires EnerTech to haul and process an average of 200 Wet Tons Per Day ("WTPD") of biosolids at its facility in the City of Rialto for a term of ten (10) years with four, five year options. EnerTech's biosolids processing facility uses a patented SlurryCarbTM technology to convert biosolids to a dried fuel called E-Fuel. E-Fuel has a heating value equivalent to a low-grade coal, but has the added benefit of being from a renewable resource. EnerTech will be supplying their E-Fuel to the nearby cement plant to augment their power supply. The ash from the E-Fuel will be used as a cement additive, which means this process has zero resulting solid waste. The EnerTech facility will use EnerTech's proprietary SlurryCarb technology and is designed to process approximately 625 WTPD of biosolids to service the needs of various public agencies in the Region. The EnerTech Contract offers long-term benefits as OCSD strives to balance economics, environmental, and societal criteria to create a sustainable biosolids management program. The environmental and societal benefits of OCSD choosing EnerTech include: • EnerTech is leading the next generation of biosolids management options with its environmentally-friendly, renewable energy technology. • The location of EnerTech's regional biosolids processing facility will reduce the overall emissions generated since it is 200—350 miles closer to OCSD's treatment plants than our other long-range biosolids management options. • EnerTech has garnered the support of local officials by offering value-added services. • Diversity is a key factor in OCSD's long-term biosolids program's sustainability. This means "not putting all our eggs in one basket" by using multiple management facilities and multiple vendors in multiple locations. Energy is a new option for OCSD that increases our biosolids product diversity and compliments our existing composted-soil amendment and farm-fertilizing biosolids products. In July, 2005, the Board considered and approved the terms of the EnerTech Contract. However, OCSD's obligation to perform under the EnerTech Contract is contingent upon the successful completion of the CEQA process. The Board is therefore being asked to (1) consider the Biosolids Contract Addendum along with the 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR and approve the Addendum to satisfy this contingency and (2) to reaffirm its approval of the EnerTech contract. Synagro Contract The proposed Synagro contract requires Synagro to haul and process "a minimum of 250 WTPD of biosolids" for composting at the Synagro facility at the South Kern Industrial Center. This corresponds to approximately ten (10) haul truck trips per day. The Synagro facility has the capacity to process a maximum of 400,000 tons per year of organic waste, including biosolids, pre-consumer food waste, pre-screened and ground greenwaste, and manure. This organic waste would be mixed with up to 270,000 tons per year of"bulking agents" or"agricultural by-products" that include, for example, wood chips, pistachio and almond hulls, screened greenwaste, cotton gin waste and orchard trimmings. The recycling LB:wh H:ldeptlagenda\Board Agenda Reports12007 Board Agenda Reports10207Utem 8(c).Biosolids-aft 1.doc Revised: 2-16-07 process would generate 670,000 tons of organic material per year. The organic material will be recycled or mixed with greenwaste to produce approximately 550,000 cubic yards per year of Exceptional Quality (EQ) fertilizer/soil amendment. The term EQ is used to designate a product that meets criteria for pathogen reduction to negligible levels, vector attraction and reduction practices to prevent excessive metals additions. On April 26, 2006, the Board considered and approved the terms of the Synagro Contract. However, like the EnerTech contract, OCSD's obligation to perform under the Synagro Contract is contingent upon the successful completion of the CEQA process. The Board is therefore being asked to (1) consider the Biosolids Contract Addendum along with the 1999 Strategic Plan and approve the Addendum to satisfy this contingency and (2)to reaffirm its earlier approval of the Synagro Contract. ALTERNATIVES (1) Not consider and approve the Biosolids Contracts Addendum, and instead require additional environmental analysis to satisfy the Court of Appeal's holding in CSD No. 2. (2) Not consider and approve the Biosolids Contracts Addendum, and instead require additional analysis to satisfy the CEQA review contingencies contained in the EnerTech and Synagro contracts. (3) No final approval of the EnerTech and Synagro pending additional analysis pursuant to CEQA. CEQA FINDINGS Pursuant to CEQA, the OCSD staff has prepared the Biosolids Contract Addendum to the 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR. In October 1999, the OCSD Board certified the 1999 PEIR and approved the 1999 Strategic Plan.' The 1999 Strategic Plan included a comprehensive biosolids management component and the environmental effect of this component was analyzed in the 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR. The PEIR assumed and evaluated a significant long-term increase in biosolids production at OCSD's treatment plants. The 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR assumed and analyzed an increase in biosolids production from the 1996/1997 baseline" level of 180,000 wet tons per year ("WTPY") and 7,200 annual haul truck trips to up to 421,000 WrPY" and 16,840 annual haul truck trips over a 20 year period. (See 1999 Strategic Plan Draft PEIR, Table 3-24). This biosolids production increase corresponds to an additional 240,000 WTPY of biosolids and 9,640 annual haul truck trips. The 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR assumed that an additional thirty- eight (38) haul truck trips per day (from twenty-seven (27) in 1998 to a maximum of sixty-five (65) in 2020) would be required to accommodate the increase in biosolids production. (See Final 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR, Table 6.2-2). The purpose of the Addendum is to conduct"second tier" or"site specific" environmental review of 2000 Contract, EnerTech Contract and Synagro Contract in accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15168, subsections (c) (2) and (c) (4). Because these Contracts concern biosolids management and biosolids management was a component of the overall program evaluated in the PEIR, these contracts are considered "subsequent activities" in the program for purposes of CEQA Guidelines section 15168. ' Due to the sheer length of the 1999 Strategic Plan Final PEIR,the Final PEIR is not included as an attachment to this Agenda Report.However,the 1999 Strategic Plan PEIR is available for Board review at 10844 Ellis Ave.Fountain Valley,CA. LB:wh H:Ideptlagenda\Board Agenda Reports12007 Board Agenda Reports1020711tem 8(c).Biosolids-aft 1.doc Revised: 2-16-07 4 r This Addendum documents that the "site specific" impacts of the proposed contracts do not require the preparation of a "subsequent" EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15162 because there are no new or substantially more severe significant environmental effects that were not previously considered or addressed in the 1999 PEIR. In addition, no new information of substantial importance has surfaced that was not known or could not have been known at the time the PER was certified that shows that the project would have some new or more severe impact. LB:wh H:ldeptlagenda\Board Agenda Reports12007 Board Agenda Reports1020711tem 8(c).Biosolids-att 1.doc Revised: 2-16-07 >I ADDENDUM TO THE 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN PROGRAM EIR, BIOSOLIDS HA ULING TO TULE RANCH (KERN COUNTY, CA), SOUTH KERN COMPOSTING FACILITY (KERN COUNTY, CA), AND ENERTECH RENEWABLE ENERGY FACILITY (RIALTO, CA) Prepared by: Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 February, 2007 528774.1 OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 II. Previous Environmental Documentation and Related Permits/Approvals ..........................................................................................................................1 A. 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report "°1999 PEIR")..............................................................................................................1 B. Construction and Operation of a Regional Biosolids Processing Facility Environmental Impact Report ("EnerTech EIR") (State Clearing house,"SCH"No. 2004041018)................................................................2 C. Final Supplement to the Environmental Impact Report for South Kern Industrial Center Specific Plan ("Synagro EIR") (SCH No. 1991122017)...............................................................................................2 D. Regional Water Quality Control Board ("RWQCB")Negative Declarations Relating to Land Application of Biosolids at Tule Ranch.............................................................................................................3 III. Scope of Environmental Review...........................................................................................4 IV. Project Description................................................................................................................5 A. Biosolids Hauling.......................................................................................................5 1. 2000 Contract.................................................................................................5 2. EnerTech Contract........................................................................................6 3. Synagro Contract...........................................................................................6 B. Biosolids Processing at Receiver Sites......................................................................6 1. Tule Ranch 2000 Contract............................................................................7 2. EnerTech Contract........................................................................................7 3. Synagro Contract...........................................................................................7 V. Environmental Analysis........................................................................................................7 A. `Baseline"Condition.................................................................................................7 528774.1 ii OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM 1. Biosolids Hauling...........................................................................................7 a. 2000 Contract.....................................................................................7 b. EnerTech and Synagro Contract......................................................8 2. Biosolids Processing at the Receiver Sites...................................................8 a. Tule Ranch ......................................................................................8 b. EnerTech and Synagro Contract......................................................9 B. Environmental Effects ............................................................................................10 1. Biosolids Hauling Impacts...........................................................................10 a. Traffic Impacts.................................................................................10 1. 1999 PEIR Conclusions.......................................................10 2. Project Impacts....................................................................11 b. Noise Impacts...................................................................................12 1. 1999 PEIR Conclusion.........................................................12 2. Project Impacts....................................................................12 C. Air Quality Impacts.........................................................................13 1. 1999 PEIR Conclusion.........................................................13 2. Project Impacts....................................................................13 2. Biosolids Processing at the Receiver Site...................................................13 a. 2000 Contract...................................................................................13 b. EnerTech and Synagro Contracts..................................................15 VI. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................16 Appendix A Biosolid Hauling Traffic Impacts Analysis, Tule Ranch, July 2006 Appendix B Biosolids HaulingTraffic Impacts Analysis, South Kern Industrial Center, July 2006 Appendix C Biosolids Hauling Traffic Impacts Analysis, EnerTech Renewable Energy Facility, July 2006 528774.1 iii OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM I. INTRODUCTION The Orange County Sanitation District ("OCSD"), as lead agency, has prepared this Addendum to the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report ("1999 PEIR") pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). The purpose of this Addendum is two fold. First, OCSD has prepared this Addendum to comply with the California Court of Appeal decision in County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County v. County of Kern, 127 Cal. App. 4th 1544 (2005)("CSD No. 2 v. Kern"). In CSD No. 2 v. Kern, the Court of Appeal held that OCSD should have conducted CEQA review prior to the OCSD Board of Director's (the "Board") January, 2000 approval of a contract with Shane Magan for the hauling and land disposal of Class B biosolids at Tule Ranch in Kern County ("2000 Contract"). Second, the Addendum has been prepared to evaluate the environmental effects of two additional biosolids contracts that will be considered by the OCSD Board of Directors. One contract is between OCSD and EnerTech Environmental, Inc. ("EnerTech") and will facilitate the hauling and processing of biosolids at EnerTech's renewable energy facility in the City of Rialto ("EnerTech Contract".) The other contract is between OCSD and Synagro and will facilitate the hauling and processing of biosolids at Synagro's organic waste recycling facility at the South Kern Industrial Center("SKIC") in South Kern County ("Synagro Contract"). II. PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND RELATED PERMITS/APPROVALS As noted above, this Addendum is an addendum to the 1999 PEIR. This section briefly summarizes the 1999 PEIR and its conclusions relating to the increase in biosolids management activities contemplated in that document. This section also references and briefly discusses other environmental documents and related permits that the City of Rialto, County of Kern, and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board ("RWQCB") approved in conjunction with each agency's approval of various land use entitlements to allow biosolids processing at Tule Ranch, and the EnerTech and Synagro facilities. All of these environmental documents are available for public review at the District's offices at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, CA. A. 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (111999 PEIR") In October 1999, the OCSD Board certified the 1999 PEIR and approved the 1999 Strategic Plan. The 1999 Strategic Plan included a comprehensive biosolids management component and the environmental effect of this component was analyzed in the 1999 PEIR. The 1999 PEIR described the "Residual SolidsBiosolids Management" program in Section 3.10 and evaluated the environmental impacts of the biosolids management component of the Strategic Plan in Section 8.0. The 1999 PEIR discussed existing biosolids management practices, including the land application of biosolids, and "biosolids management opportunities," such as "cement-kiln injection." (Draft PEIR, pp.s 8-10-8-12) As the 1999 PEIR explains, "cement-kiln injection" involves incorporating dewatered biosolids into a cement manufacturing process. 528774,1 1 OCSD BIOSOUDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM r The PEIR assumed and evaluated a significant long term increase in biosolids production at OCSD's treatment plants. The 1999 PEIR assumed and analyzed an increase in biosolids production from the 1996/1997 "baseline" level of 180,000 wet tons per year ("WTPY") and 7,200 annual haul truck trips to up to 421,000 "WTPY" and 16,840 annual haul truck trips over a 20 year period. (See 1999 Draft PEIR, Table 3-24). This biosolids production increase corresponds to an additional 240,000 WTPY of biosolids and 9,640 annual haul truck trips. The 1999 PEIR assumed that an additional thirty-eight (38) haul truck trips per day (from twenty- seven (27) in 1998 to a maximum of sixty-five (65) in 2020) would be required to accommodate the increase in biosolids production. (See Final 1999 PEIR, Table 6.2-2). The 1999 PEIR concluded in Section 8.5 that this increase in biosolids production activity would have a less than significant traffic and noise impacts with implementation of identified mitigation measures, a less than significant impact on water quality at the land application sites, and a less than significant "cumulative impact on availability of land application sites." The 1999 PEIR concluded that air quality impacts from increased haul truck trips would be significant and unavoidable because Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) emissions, a precursor to Ozone, would exceed SCAQMD thresholds. This emissions result from significant increase in biosolids haul truck trips and a corresponding increase in total "vehicle miles traveled." B. Construction and Operation of a Regional Biosolids Processing Facility Environmental Impact Report ("EnerTech EIR") (State Clearing house, "SCH" No. 2004041018) On December 21, 2004, the City of Rialto certified the EnerTech EIR and approved, inter alia, a conditional development permit for the Enertech project. According to the EIR, the EnerTech project would be located on a 1.3 acre portion of the City of Rialto's approximately nine (9) acre Wastewater Treatment Plant site. The project includes three (3) main buildings/structures, including (1) the main processing structure, which would be an open air, two level building housing most of the process equipment, (2) an administration/laboratory building, and (3) a maintenance shop and warehouse building. The project would have a design capacity to process up to 625 wet tons per day ("WTPD") or 125 dry tons per day of biosolids at approximately 20 percent solids to produce approximately 105 dry tons of"e-fuel", the finished product. E-fuel is a renewable fuel and would partially replace fossil fuels currently being used at these plants. The "e" fuel product produced at the EnerTech facility would then be transported to various cement kiln operations in California. The EnerTech EIR concluded that the project would have a less than significant impact on the environment. The EIR concluded that land use, traffic, air quality and noise impacts would be less than significant. The EIR further that geology, water resources, hazards and hazardous materials, biological resources and paleontological resources impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level. The project would have no significant and unavoidable impacts on the environment. C. Final Supplement to the Environmental Impact Report for South Kern Industrial Center Specific Plan ("Synagro EIR") (SCH No. 1991122017) 528774.1 2 OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM On October 22, 2002, the Board of Supervisors of Kern County certified the Synagro EIR and approved various land use entitlements, including a Conditional Use Permit (Resolution No. 2002-421), for the Synagro project. The Synagro project entailed the construction of a non- hazardous organic waste recycling facility on 100 acres of an approximately 250 acre parcel within the SKIC Specific Plan area. The project has the capacity to process a maximum of 400,000 tons per year of organic waste, including biosolids, pre-consumer food waste, pre- screened and ground greenwaste, and manure. This organic waste would be mixed with up to 270,000 tons per year of"bulking agents" or "agricultural byproducts" that include, for example, wood chips, pistachio and almond hulls, screened greenwaste, cotton gin waste and orchard trimmings. The recycling process would generate 670,000 tons of organic material per year. The organic material will be recycled or mixed with to produce approximately 550,000 cubic yards per year of Exceptional Quality (EQ) fertilizer/soil amendment. The term EQ is used to designate product that meets criteria for pathogen reduction to negligible levels, vector attraction and reduction practices to prevent excessive metals additions The Synagro EIR concluded that the project would have a significant and unavoidable environmental impact on air quality, biological resources, and hazards/hazardous waste. The EIR further concluded that agricultural resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hydrology, land use, noise, public services, traffic, and utilities/service systems impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level. D. Regional Water Quailty Control Board ("RWQCB") Negative Declarations Relating to Land Application of Biosolids at Tule Ranch In conjunction with the RWQCB's approval of Order No. 94-253, "Waste Discharge Requirements for Shane Magan Tule Ranch Sludge Injection Kern County," dated September 16, 1994" ("WDR 94-253"), the RWQCB approved a Negative Declaration (SCH No. 94072045). The initial study that supported the Negative Declaration evaluated Shane Magan's proposed injection of "treated, stabilized, domestic wastewater treatment plant sewage sludge" on 1,440 acres of land in Kern County and concluded that all potential impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level. In addition, in conjunction with the RWQCB's approval of General Order 95-140, "Waste Discharge Requirements for Reuse of Biosolids and Septage on Agricultural, Forest, and Reclamation Sites ("General Order")," the RWQCB similarly approved a Negative Declaration (See RWQCB, Central Region, "Initial Environmental Study and Negative Declaration for Waste Discharge Requirements General Order for Reuse of Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plant Sludge and Septage on Agricultural, Forest, and Reclamation Sites," August 1993 [General Order Initial Study/Negative Declaration]). The "General Order" served as "Waste Discharge Requirements" for the reuse of domestic wastewater treatment plant sludge and septage as soil amendment and fertilizer on agricultural, forest, and reclamation sites. Under the General Order, site operators and property owners proposing to use sludge or septic were required to submit a Notice of Intent("NOI") and filing fee to obtain coverage under the Order. 528774.1 3 OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM In accordance with the requirements of the General Order, Tule Ranch filed three NOIs to comply with the General Order. On January 18, 1996, the RWQCB approved NOI Identification No. 95-14035, which allowed for the land application of biosolids on approximately 1,800 acres in Kings County. On May 10, 1996, the RWQCB approved, NOI Identification No.s 95-14046 and 95-14047, which collectively allowed land application of biosolids on an additional 2,680 acres in Kern County (note that WDR 94-253 had already authorized land application on 1,440 acres). Therefore, as of May 10, 1996 and pursuant to the RWQCB permits, Shane Magan was permitted to land apply biosolids on approximately 5,900 acres, including 4,100 acres in Kern and another 1,800 acres in neighboring Kings County when the OCSD Board approved the 2000 Contract. III. SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW As discussed in Section II, the OCSD Board previously certified the 1999 PEIR. The PEIR analyzed significant increases in biosolids production, including an increase in the number of haul truck trips departing from its treatment plants each day and, to a limited extent, land application activity at receiver sites, by the year 2020. The 1999 PEIR, however, did not identify the specific receiver sites that would be accepting and processing the increase in biosolids. Some of these sites are now known. OCSD prepared the 1999 PEIR to allow for more streamlined and focused environmental review of future "subsequent activities" that were contemplated in the 1999 PEIR. The CEQA Guidelines describe a process for conducting CEQA review of"subsequent activities" that were contemplated in a "program" EIR. The CEQA Guidelines provide in pertinent part: (c) Use with Later Activities. Subsequent activities in the program must be examined in the light of the program EIR to determine whether an additional environmental document must be prepared. (2) If the agency finds that pursuant to Section 15162, no new effects could occur or no new mitigation measures would be required, the agency can approve the activity as being within the scope of the project covered by the program EIR, and no new environmental document would be required. (4) Where the subsequent activities involve site specific operations, the agency should use a written checklist or similar device to document the evaluation of the site and the activity to determine whether the environmental effects of the operation were covered in the program EIR. (14 California Code Regs. §15168) szs774A 4 OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM v The purpose of the Addendum is to conduct "second tier" or "site specific" environmental review of 2000 Contract, EnerTech Contract and Synagro Contract in accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15168, subsections (c) (2) and (c) (4) above. Because these Contracts concern biosolids management and biosolids management was a component of the overall program evaluated in the PEIR, these contracts are considered "subsequent activities" in the program for purposes of CEQA Guidelines section 15168. (CSD No. 2 v. Kern, supra, 127 Cal. App. 4th at 1635). This Addendum documents that the "site specific" impacts of the proposed contracts do not require the preparation of a "subsequent" EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15162 because there are no new or substantially more severe significant environmental effects that were not previously considered or addressed in the 1999 PEIR. In addition, no new information of substantial importance has surfaced that was not known or could not have been known at the time the PEIR was certified that shows that the project would have some new or more severe impact. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164(c), OCSD is not required to circulate the Addendum for public review and comment. IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project entails the OCSD Board's (1) reconsideration of the 2000 Contract in accordance with the holding in CSD No. 2 v. Kern, and (2) final approval of two (2) new biosolids processing contracts. These contracts require Shane Magan (as the operator of Tule Ranch), EnerTech, and Synagro to accept and process, for an agreed upon fee, a portion of the approximately 685 wet tons per day ("WTPD") of biosolids that OCSD generates at it treatment plant. Each contract essentially entails two components that have the potential to impact the environment: (1) biosolids hauling and (2) biosolids processing at the receiver site. Each of these components is discussed separately below, as it relates to each biosolids contract. A. Biosolids Hauling 1. 2000 Contract The OCSD Board's approval of the 2000 Contract superseded an earlier biosolids contract with Magan that the OCSD Board approved in 1996. The 2000 Contract modified payment terms, but generally did not alter the obligations and duties of the parties relating to the hauling and land application of Class B biosolids at Tule Ranch. However, unlike the earlier contract, the 2000 Contract required Shane Magan to reserve space at Tule Ranch to accommodate up to 140,000 wet tons per year of OCSD biosolids. However, based upon a review of OCSD biosolids hauling records for a three year period (2000-2002) after the Board approved the 2000 Contract, Magan, on average, actually accepted for hauling and land disposal approximately 99,000 WTPY of biosolids, well below the reserved capacity described in the contract. Moreover, the greatest quantity of OCSD biosolids hauled and land applied at Tule Ranch over this three-year period was approximately 115,000 wet tons in 2002. 528774.1 5 OCSD BIOSOLfDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM For purposes of analyzing the environmental effects of the 2000 Contract, monthly and annual haul truck trips to Tule Ranch were averaged for a two (2) year period, beginning in 1998, the first full year of biosolids shipments after the Board approved the 2000 Contract, and ending in 1999,just before the Board approved the 2000 Contract in January, 2000.1 Based on a comparison of a two-year period before and a three-year period after the Board approved the 2000 Contract, OCSD hauled an additional 26,650 WTPY of biosolids to Tule Ranch. This increase in biosolids production resulted in a corresponding increase of approximately 1,105 annual truck trips or approximately six (6) truck trips per day based on OCSD's typical five (5) day, Monday through Friday, hauling schedule. Therefore, these are the assumptions that are used in this Addendum for purposes of defining the project and analyzing the potential environmental effects of increased biosolids hauling to Tule Ranch pursuant to the 2000 Contract. Table 1 Comparison of Pre and Post Board Approval of Magan Contract Tule Ranch Biosolids Productionl Years Per Yr. Tons/Mo. Tons/Yr 1998-1999 2,755 6,028 72,330 2000-2002 3,860 8,247 98,980 Difference +1,105 +2,219 +26,650 OCSD,Solids Monitoring Reports,dated 1998 through 2002. 2. EnerTech Contract The proposed EnerTech contract requires EnerTech to haul and process an average of 200 WTPD of biosolids at its facility in the City of Rialto. EnerTech would haul the biosolids to its processing and management facility that is currently under construction in the City of Rialto. This corresponds to approximately eight (8)truck trips per day. 3. Synagro Contract The proposed Synagro contract requires Synagro to haul and process "a minimum of 250 WTPD of biosolids" for composting at the Synagro facility at the South Kern Industrial Center. This corresponds to approximately ten (10) haul truck trips per day. B. Biosolids Processing at Receiver Sites Each contract contemplates a different form of biosolids processing and reuse at the receiver sites. The 2000 Contract required the land application and reuse of biosolids for agricultural purposes. The EnerTech Contract entails the processing and reuse of biosolids as "e- fuel" for cement slurry. Finally, the Synagro Contract entails the processing and reuse of biosolids into high quality compost that is sold in retail outlets. Each of the biosolids receiver ' OCSD actually commenced shipments to Tule Ranch in March, 1997. Because OCSD did not ship biosolids to Tule Ranch for a full twelve month period,year 1997 biosolids hauling and shipment data was excluded from the average. However, the amount of biosolids shipped over the 10 month period is generally consistent with the daily and monthly averages for 1998 and 1999. 528774.1 6 OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM P sites/facilities has undergone independent CEQA review by each of the respective lead agencies or primary permitting agency for the site/facility. Below is a brief explanation of how OCSD's biosolids will be processed at each of the receiver sites. 1. Tule Ranch 2000 Contract For purposes of this Addendum, the analysis assumes that the 2000 Contract increased the amount of OCSD biosolids being processed at Tule Ranch by 2,200 wet tons per month and 26,650 WTPY. The assumption is based on a comparison of pre and post 2000 biosolids processing records for Tule Ranch, which is summarized in Table 1. As noted in Table 1, before OCSD approved the 2000 Contract, Shane Magan accepted and processed, on average, based on a two year period, approximately 6,000 wet tons per month and 72,300 wet tons per year of OCSD biosolids. After OCSD approved the 2000 Contract, Tule Ranch accepted and land applied, on average, based on a three-year period, approximately 8,200 wet tons per month and 99,000 wet tons per year of OCSD biosolids. 2. EnerTech Contract The proposed EnerTech Contract requires EnerTech to accept, process and convert 200 WTPD of OCSD biosolids to a renewal fuel source known as "e-fuel." E-fuel will be used by a local cement kiln as an alternative to coal. The EnerTech facility will use EnerTech's proprietary SlurryCarb technology and is designed to process approximately 625 WTPD of biosolids to service the needs of various public agencies in the Region. 3. Synagro Contract The proposed Synagro Contract requires Synagro to accept and process a minimum of 250 WTPD of OCSD biosolids. Synagro is required, to process the biosolids to Class A standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations ("CFR") Part 503 and to comply with best management practices and all federal, state and local regulations in existence. The Synagro facility is designed to process approximately 400,000 tons per year of organic waste, including biosolids. Based on a five (5) day hauling schedule, EnerTech is required to process a minimum of 65,250 WTPY of OCSD biosolids. V. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS A. "Baseline" Condition 1. Biosolids Hauling a. 2000 Contract: OCSD had been hauling and land applying biosolids to Tule Ranch for several years prior to the Board's approval of the 2000 Contract. Therefore, environmental impacts relating to biosolids production and land application at Tule Ranch were already occurring when the Board approved the 2000 Contract. 528774.1 7 z OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM For purposes of evaluating the potential environmental impacts of the 2000 Contract, OCSD determined the "baseline" condition by calculating the average amount of monthly annual haul truck trips to Tule Ranch for a full two (2) year period (1998-1999) prior to approving the 2000 Contract in January, 2000. Table 1 summarizes haul truck trip activity from January, 1998, the first full year of biosolids shipments after OCSD first started hauling biosolids to Tule Ranch, to December 1999, one month prior to the Board's approval of the 2000 Contract. OCSD generated 2,755 trips per year to Tule Ranch, which corresponds to, on average, eleven (11)truck trips per day, and 230 trips per month. Table 2 1998-1999 Biosolids Production et Tons IVff Year Tri s/Yr WT/Mo. WT/Yr 1998 2,802 6,227 74,720 1999 2,707 5,828 69,940 Avg. 2,755 6,028 72,330 b. EnerTech and Synagro Contract: Unlike the OCSD's hauling activity to Tule Ranch, OCSD has not historically hauled biosolids to either the EnerTech or Synagro facilities. Therefore, for purposes of analyzing the environmental effects of the EnerTech and Synagro contracts, the analysis assumes that OCSD is not presently hauling biosolids to either of these sites. 2. Biosolids Processing at the Receiver Sites As discussed in Section II of the Addendum, Shane Magan was land applying biosolids at Tule Ranch pursuant to several RWQCB approvals. Similarly, both the EnerTech and Synagro facilities have been fully permitted and either have been constructed or are under construction. Each of these entities have a vested right to operate their facilities at the permitted capacity authorized under the permits. Because each of the receiver sites have been fully permitted and have undergone full CEQA review, the "baseline" condition for purposes of evaluating the environmental impacts of processing biosolids at the receiver sites is the "maximum permitted capacity" of each facility. (See Fairvieiv Neighbors v. County of Ventura, (1999) 70 Cal. App. 4th 238 [EIR appropriately assumed the existing traffic impact level to be the traffic generated when the mine operates at full capacity pursuant to the entitlement previously permitted by a Conditional Use Permit]; Benton v. Board of Supervisors, (1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 1467, 1477 [For purposes of assessing the environmental effects of a project, "...the actual physical environment includes that which the [applicant] has a legal right to build under permits which have already been issued and on which construction has already begun."] a. Tule Ranch: When the Board approved the 2000 Contract, Mr. Magan was already accepting and land disposing biosolids at Tule Ranch pursuant to four (4) RWQCB approvals issued in 1994 and 1996. These permits authorized the land application of biosolids on approximately 5,900 acres, including 4,100 acres in Kern County (WDR# 94-253, 528774.1 8 OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM NOI Identification No.s 95-14046 and 95-14047) and another 1,800 acres in neighboring Kings County(NOI Identification No. 95-14035). During the two (2) year period prior to the Board's approval of the 2000 Contract, Tule Ranch had been actually land applying, on average, approximately 153,800 WTPY of biosolids. (See Table 2). OCSD's average contribution of 72,330 WTPY to Tule Ranch during that same two (2) year period represented about 47% of the biosolids being land applied at Tule Ranch. Several other sanitary sewer agencies in Southern California generated the remaining fifty-three percent (53%) or approximately 92,000 WTs of biosolids that were being land applied at Tule Ranch. Table 3 1998-1999 Tule Ranch Land Application Activity YR Total WTs1 Acres Used WTs/acre OCSD Total 2 OCSD % of Total Applied 1998 142,744 3,800 39 74,720 52% 1999 164,901 5,220 31 69,940 42% AVG. 153,823 4,510 35 72,330 47% "Honey Bucket Farms,Annual Biosolids Application Reports"dated 1998 to 1999. Z OCSD,Solids Monitoring Reports,dated 1998 and 1999 However, the "maximum permitted capacity" at Tule Ranch to accept and land apply biosolids in January, 2000 was greater than the amount of biosolids actually being land applied at Tule Ranch. Based on a review Annual Biosolids Application Reports between 1998 and 2005, Tule Ranch land applied on average approximately 74 WTs of biosolids per acre during this period pursuant to the terms of the RWQCB permits. However, based on a telephone conversation with Shane Magan, he indicated that a more conservative 50 WTs per acre figure should be used for purposes of establishing a maximum permitted capacity. Mr. Magan also indicated that 400 acres should be subtracted from the total land application area of 5,900 acres to account for existing roads and areas that can not accommodate biosolids, which results in a net land application area of 5,500 acres. Using the more conservative rate of 50 WTs/acre, when the Board approved the 2000 Contract, Tule Ranch could have accommodated a maximum of approximately 275,000 WTs (50 WTs per acre x 5,500 ac.) of biosolids annually at Tule Ranch in accordance with the terms of the RWQCB permits. Accordingly, prior to the Board's approval of the 2000 Contract,Tule Ranch was operating at 56% of its permitted capacity. b. EnerTech and Synagro Contract: The EnerTech facility is currently permitted to process approximately 625 WTPD or 125 dry tons of biosolids to service the needs of various public agencies in the Region. Based on a 365 day year, the EnerTech Facility has the capacity to process up to 228,125 WTPY and 45,625 dry tons per year. The Synagro facility is currently permitted to process a maximum of approximately 1,100 tons per day of organic waste, including biosolids. This corresponds to 400,000 tons per year of organic waste. The organic material will be mixed with bulking agents 528774.1 9 OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM and recycled to produce approximately 550,000 cubic yards per year of Exceptional Quality (EQ) fertilizer/soil amendment. B. Environmental Effects This section analyzes whether approving the proposed biosolids contracts creates any new environmental effects that were not previously addressed in the 1999 PEIR or results in a substantial increase in the severity any significant environmental effect that was identified in the 1999 PEIR. Each contract would have potential environmental impacts relating to biosolids hauling and processing at the receiver sites. However, as discussed below,the PEIR contemplated a significant increase in haul truck trips to various receiver sites over the twenty year time frame of the Strategic Plan. The new biosolids haul truck trips that would be generated under the proposed contracts fall within the range of trips contemplated and addressed in the 1999 PEIR. Therefore, the additional haul truck trips that would be generated pursuant to these three (3) contracts would not result in any new environmental effects or increase the severity of any the environmental effects, such as traffic and noise impacts, that were previously disclosed and addressed in the PEIR. To make certain, OCSD retained Integrated Program Management Consultants ("IMPC") to prepare site or "route specific" traffic impacts analyses, which have confirmed the conclusions of the PEIR.2 These traffic impacts analyses are attached as Appendices to the Addendum. These three (3) contracts would similarly not create any new environmental effects or increase the severity of any previously identified environmental effects resulting from biosolids processing at the receiver sites. As discussed below, each of the receiver sites have been fully permitted and underwent independent CEQA review by those agencies that had land use jurisdiction and permitting authority over the facilities. The quantity of biosolids being shipped and processed at the receiver sites pursuant to each contract is well with the "maximum permitted capacity" of each of these facilities. The contracts, therefore, would not result in any environmental effects above and beyond the "baseline" condition that is discussed in section IV (A) (2) of the Addendum. Moreover, the environmental effects resulting from the construction and operation of the facilities at each receiver site were fully disclosed in the CEQA documents described in Section 11 of the Addendum. 1. Biosolids Hauling Impacts a. Traffic Impacts: 1. 1999 PEIR Conclusions The 1999 PEIR assumed and evaluated a significant long term increase in biosolids production. The 1999 PEIR assumed and analyzed a significant increase in biosolids production from the 1996/1997 level of 180,000 2 IPMC,Biosolids Hauling Traffic Impact Analysis, EnerTech Rene►vable Energy Facility,July 2006; IPMC,Biosolids Hauling Traffic Impact Analysis, South Kern Industrial,July 2006; IPMC,Biosolids Hauling Traffic impact Analysis, Title Ranch,July 2006. 529774.1 10 OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM WTPY and 7,200 annual haul truck trips, to up to 421,000 WTPY and 16,840 annual haul truck trips over a 20 year period based on the full secondary treatment scenario. This biosolids production increase corresponds to an additional 240,000 WTPY of biosolids and 9,640 annual haul truck trips. The 1999 PEIR assumed that daily biosolids haul truck trips would increase by thirty-eight (38) truck trips from twenty-seven (27) in 1998 to a maximum of sixty-five (65) in 2020 (See Final PEIR, Table 6.2-2). The 1999 PEIR concluded in Section 8.0 that an additional 9,640 annual truck trips or 38 haul truck trips per day would have a less than significant traffic impact with implementation of mitigation (See "Impact 8-2," pp.s 8-14 — 8-15). According to the 1999 PEIR, the increase in biosolids trips would not be significant when compared to the total volume of traffic on streets adjacent to the treatment plants and along major haul routes. However, during the peak morning and evening hour period, the 1999 PEIR concluded that the increase in truck trips could cause congestion and identified mitigation measures 8-2 to reduce this impact to a less than significant level. Mitigation measure 8-2 requires OCSD to limit truck trips associated with the transport of residual solids to off-peak hours when possible as a means of reducing truck travel times and minimizing congestion impacts to the regional transportation system. 2. Project Impacts: Each contract would increase the number of daily haul truck trips departing Plants 1 and 2. The 2000 Contract generated an additional six (6) truck trips per day based on OCSD's typical five (5) day, Monday through Friday, hauling schedule. The EnerTech contract would generate in eight (8) new truck trips per day. The Synagro Contract would generate ten (10) new truck trips per day. Collectively, these contracts would generate twenty four (24) new haul truck trips, which represent approximately sixty three percent (63%) of the projected increase in daily truck trips (38 truck trips) that was described and evaluated in the 1999 PEIR. Accordingly, the projected increase in haul truck trips would not exceed the projected increase contemplated in the 1999 PEIR would not have a new significant impact or result in a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified traffic impact that was described in the 1999 PEIR. Notwithstanding that these truck trips were within the range contemplated in the 1999 PEIR, the 1999 PEIR did not evaluate any "route" or "site-specific" traffic impacts from OCSD's treatment plants to the receiver sites. Therefore, OCSD retained IPMC to conduct route specific traffic studies for each of the contracts. Each traffic study concluded that the additional haul truck trips would not have a significant traffic impact and would not change the Level of Service on the designated routes to the receiver sites. 2000 Contract Study: The Tule Ranch traffic study conservatively assumes that there would be ten (10) additional truck trips to Tule Ranch on the route specified in the traffic analysis attached as Appendix A and incorporated herein by reference. As noted above, the actual increase in truck trips after the Board approved the 2000 Contract was six (6). Based on ten (10) new daily truck trips, the traffic study concluded that there would be no significant effect on the Level of Service (LOS) of affected roadways and intersections along the route to Tule Ranch. Even under the worst-case scenario, where all ten (10) trucks depart the treatment plants to the Tule Ranch sites in Kern County at the same time, the percent change in volumes on the 528774.1 11 OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM analyzed route segments is less than 1.5 percent of the freeway segments and less than 2 percent on the arterial segments. On the two-lane segments, there are higher percentages of volume changes, but the overall volumes are low. These increases will cause no measurable effects on the operations or the LOS of the analyzed segments. This conclusion is consistent with the 1999 PEIR conclusion that traffic impacts would be less than significant. EnerTech Contract: The EnerTech traffic study assumed that this contract would generate eight (8) new truck trips on the route specified in the traffic analysis attached as Appendix B and incorporated herein by reference. The study concluded that this increase in truck trips would have no significant effects on the LOS of affected roadways and intersections along the route to the facility. Even with the worst-case scenario, where all eight (8) trucks depart the treatment plants to EnerTech at the same time, the percent change in volumes on the analyzed route segments is less than 1 percent of the freeway segments and less than 2 percent on the arterial segments in Orange County. On the two-lane segments, there are higher percentages of volume changes, but the overall volumes are low. These increases will cause no measurable effects on the operations or LOS of the analyzed segments. This conclusion is consistent with the 1999 PEIR that traffic impacts would be less than significant. The EIR that the City of Rialto prepared in conjunction with the permitting of the EnerTech facility similarly evaluated site specific traffic impacts on affected roadways and intersections in the City of Rialto. As documented in Section 4.7 of the Draft EIR, any potential increase in traffic due to the EnerTech "would not significantly increase delay or decrease the LOS"at any of the studied intersections. (See Draft EIR, p. 4.7-7). Synagro Contract: The Synagro traffic study assumed that this contract would generate ten (10) new truck trips on the route specified in the traffic analysis attached as Appendix C and incorporated herein by reference. The Synagro traffic study concluded that there would be no significant effect on the LOS or traffic operations. Even with the worst-case scenario, where all the trucks depart the treatment plants to the energy facility at the same time, the percent change in volumes on the analyzed route segments is less than 1 percent of the freeway segments and less than 3 percent on the arterial segments. This increase would cause no measurable effects on the operations or the LOS of the analyzed segments. This conclusion is consistent with the conclusion of the PEIR and the Synagro EIR. The SEIR that Kern County prepared in conjunction with its approval of the Synagro facility at the SKIC also concluded that potential traffic impacts on local roadways and intersection would be insignificant. These impacts were evaluated in Section 4.14 of the SEIR, which described the local roadways and intersections that would be affected by the increase in truck trips and analyzed whether this increase would result in significant delays or deterioration in LOS. As noted in Section 4.14, all affected roadways and intersections would be operating above LOS C, which is an acceptable LOS in Kern County. (See SEIR,p. 4.14-15). b. Noise Impacts 528774.1 12 OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM 1. 1999 PEIR Conclusion: The 1999 PEIR addressed potential noise impacts due to the increase in haul truck trips in Section 8.0 (see "Impact 8-3," pps. 8-15 - 8-16). The 1999 PEIR concluded that the increase in ambient noise levels due to the increase in haul truck trips would be less than significant with mitigation measures. The 1999 PEIR concluded that the increase in noise levels along Ellis Avenue, adjacent to Plant No. 1 would not be significant because the short segment of Ellis Avenue that would be affected by the increase in truck traffic serves commercial and industrial uses, which are not considered sensitive noise receptors. Regarding haul truck trips from Plant No. 2, the 1999 PEIR explained that the increase in truck traffic could affect single family residences along a four mile stretch of Brookhurst Avenue during the nighttime, noise sensitive, hours or between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m when overall traffic levels along Brookhurst Avenue are minimal. To mitigate potential noise impacts from the increased truck traffic, the PEIR identified measures 8-3a and 8-3b. Mitigation measure 8-3a requires the District to limit truck trips relating to residual solids, such as biosolids, at Plant No. 2 to non-noise sensitive (daytime) and non-peak hours whenever possible. Mitigation measure 8-3b required the District to explore options that would reduce the number of truck trips from Plant No. 2. 2. Project Impacts: The minor increase in haul truck trips that resulted from the 2000 contract combined with the increase in haul truck trips that would result from the EnerTech and Synagro contracts were contemplated in the 1999 PEIR. The 1999 PEIR projected an overall increase in thirty-eight (38) haul truck trips from Plant No.s 1 and 2. Collectively, the three (3) biosolids contracts would generate approximately twenty-four (24) truck trips, fourteen less than the number of trips contemplated and evaluated in the 1999 PEIR. Accordingly, the projected increase in haul truck trips would not exceed the projected increase contemplated in the 1999 PEIR and would not have a new significant noise impact or result in a substantial increase in the severity of any previously noise impact identified in the 1999 PEIR. In addition, the RWQCB, City of Rialto and Kern County evaluated potential truck noise impacts on roadways affected by additional truck traffic as part of the each jurisdiction's environmental review of these facilities. As noted in the initial studies that were prepared in conjunction with the permitting of Tule Ranch, any potential noise impacts due to additional truck traffic would not be significantly different from other types of farming operations in the area. (See p. 18, RWQCB, Initial Study, dated July 1994, SCH#94072045; p. III-4, Initial Environmental Study, August 1993). In addition, the site is located in a relatively remote area away from noise sensitive land uses, such as residential areas. (Id.). Moreover, as noted above, OCSD was already generating eleven (11) biosolids truck trips per day to Tule Ranch pursuant to a previously approved contract when the Board approved the 2000 Contract. In addition to OCSD, several other sanitary sewer providers in southern California were generating truck trips to Tule Ranch Therefore, biosolids truck noise was already occurring along routes to Tule Ranch. The EnerTech facility EIR also evaluated potential truck noise impacts in Section 4.9. According to the EIR, the additional heavy truck trips that would be generated from the new facility would not increase noise levels above the 3 decibel level 528774.1 13 OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM significance threshold. In fact, the increase was projected at 0.1 decibels on affected roadways, which is well below the significance threshold. Finally, the Synagro facility SEIR evaluated potential noise impacts from biosolids haul truck trips in Section 4.11. According to the SEIR, "no noise sensitive land uses exist, or are presently planned in the vicinity of the project...Single family residential dwellings with accessory farm buildings are located in limited and scattered locations within a ten (10) mile radius of the site as the vicinity of the area is primarily utilized for agricultural purposes." (p. 4.11-2, SEIR).Therefore, the SEIR concluded that the facility would not have any significant noise impacts. C. Air Quality Impacts 1. 1999 PEIR Conclusion: The 1999 PEIR concluded in Section 6.5 that the increase in haul truck trips would have a significant and unavoidable air quality impact. According to the 1999 PEIR, these additional haul truck trips would result in Nitrogen Oxide ("NOx") emissions that would exceed SCAQNID significance thresholds. The 1999 PEIR calculated pollutant emissions based on an average 400 mile round trip between OCSD's Treatment Plants and the receiver sites. 2. Project Impacts: The minor increase in haul truck trips that resulted from the 2000 contract combined with the increase in haul truck trips that would result from the EnerTech and Synagro contracts were contemplated in the 1999 PEIR. The 1999 PEIR projected an overall increase in thirty-eight (38) haul truck trips from Plant No.s 1 and 2. Collectively, the three (3) biosolids contracts would generate approximately twenty-four (24) truck trips, fourteen less than the number of trips contemplated and evaluated in the 1999 PEIR. In addition, each of the receiver sites are located in either San Bernardino or Kem County and are at or within the 400 mile round trip assumption used to calculate pollutant emission increases in the 1999 PER. Accordingly, the projected increase in haul truck trips would not exceed the projected increase contemplated in the 1999 PEIR and would not have a new significant noise impact or result in a substantial increase in the severity of any previously noise impact identified in the 1999 PEIR. In addition, the RWQCB, City of Rialto and Kern County evaluated potential air quality impacts due to the increase in biosolids haul truck traffic as part of the each jurisdiction's environmental review of these facilities. The RWQCB analyzed potential air quality impacts of biosolids haul truck trips in conjunction when it approved WDR 94-253 for Tule Ranch and when it issued the General Order. (See See p. 11-12, RWQCB, Initial Study, dated July 1994, SCH#94072045; p. 111-2, General Order Initial Study/Negative Declaration). Similarly, air quality impacts from biosolids operations at the EnerTech facility were comprehensively addressed in Section 4.8 of the Draft EIR. Air quality impacts from biosolids operations at the Synagro facility were addressed in Section 4.3. 2. Biosolids Processing at the Receiver Site. 529774.1 14 OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM As noted in Section IV A (2) of the Addendum, each of the receiver sites has been previously permitted to process biosolids. These permits establish each facility's maximum capacity to process biosolids. Unless one or more of the contracts cause these facilities to exceed their processing capacity or otherwise alter operational characteristics of the facilities, these contracts would not result in any significant environmental effect at the receiver sites that were not already fully analyzed and mitigated, as necessary, in conjunction with the permitting and CEQA process for each facility. As documented below, each facility has more the adequate capacity to accommodate OCSD biosolids. a. 2000 Contract: Shane Magan has been permitted to land apply biosolids at Tule Ranch since 1994 when the RWQCB approved WDR# 94-253. Magan obtained additional permits to land apply biosolids in 1995 and began accepting and land applying OCSD biosolids in 1997. In January 2000 when the Board approved the 2000 Contract, Shane Magan had already secured permits that allowed the land application of biosolids on approximately 4,000 acres in Kern County and additional 1,800 acres in Kings County that comprise Tule Ranch. Based on a conservative average land application rate of approximately 50 WTs/acre per year, Tule Ranch could have theoretically land applied a maximum of 275,000 WTPY of biosolids in January 2000 when the Board approved the 2000 Contract. At the time the Board approved the 2000 Contract, Tule Ranch was operating below its maximum permitted capacity. According to land application data for the two year period prior to the 2000 Contract, which is summarized in Table 3, Tule Ranch was land applying, on average, 153,800 WTPY or approximately fifty-six percent (56%) of its maximum permitted capacity. Of the 153,800 WTPY of biosolids being land applied at Tule Ranch, OCSD was contributing approximately 72,300 WTPY biosolids and other sanitary sewer providers in California, including Los Angeles County Sanitation District, and to a lesser extent Golida, Santa Barbara, and a few other smaller generators contributed the remaining 81,000 WTPY of biosolids. After the Board approved the 2000 Contract, Tule Ranch accepted and land applied more biosolids from OCSD. On average, OCSD hauled an additional 26,650 WTPY of biosolids to Tule Ranch, increasing its overall total to 98,980 WTPY. This quantity of biosolids represented thirty-six percent (36%) of the maximum permitted capacity at Tule Ranch. Even when OCSD biosolids are added to other agency biosolids that were being land applied at Tule Ranch after the Board approved the 2000 Contract, Tule Ranch was still operating below its maximum permitted capacity. As noted in Table 4, the most biosolids Tule Ranch land applied between 2000 and 2002 was 185,201 WTPY, which represents approximately sixty-seven percent (67%) of its maximum permitted capacity of 275,000 WTPY. Table 4 2000-2002 Tule Ranch Land Application Activity YR Total WTsl Applied OCSD Total 2 OCSD % of Total 2000 136,741 76,565 55% 2001 159,580 105,518 66% 2002 185,201 114,857 62% 528774.1 15 OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM AVG. 1160,507 198,980 62% 14'Honey Bucket Farms,Annual Biosolids Application Reports"dated 2000 to 2002. 2 OCSD,Solids Monitoring Reports,dated 2000 to 2002 b. EnerTech and Synagro Contracts: Like Tule Ranch, EnerTech and Synagro have obtained permits to process biosolids at their respective facilities in the City of Rialto and Kern County. In 2004, the City of Rialto, acting as the lead agency for the project, approved a conditional development permit to facilitate the construction of the EnerTech facility, which has a design capacity to process up to 625 tons per day of biosolids. Similarly, in 2002, the Kern County Board of Supervisors approved a conditional use permit for the Synagro organic waste recycling facility. The permitted capacity of Synagro facility is 670,000 wet tons per year, which includes 400,000 tons of biosolids and 270,000 tons of bulking agents. This capacity corresponds to approximately 1,100 wet tons per day of organic waste, including biosolids, and approximately 350 average vehicle trips per day. Prior to approval of the CUP, the Board certified a Final Supplement to the Environmental Impact Report(SEIR) for the SKIC Specific Plan (SCH#1991122017) (Resolution No. 2002-420). OCSD proposes to haul eight (8)truck loads or 200 WT/day of biosolids to the EnerTech facility and ten (10) truck loads or 250 WT/day to the Synagro facility. These amounts represent approximately thirty-two percent (32%) of the maximum permitted capacity (625 tons/day) at the EnerTech facility and approximately twenty-three percent (23%) of the maximum permitted capacity (1,100 tons/day) at the Synagro facility. Accordingly, OCSD's biosolids shipments to these facilities will not exceed either facility's maximum permitted capacity, which is the "baseline" condition for purposes of assessing the significance of any potentially environmental effects from processing OCSD biosolids at these facilities. Therefore, the processing of OCSD biosolids at these facilities would not cause any potentially significant environmental effects at these facilities. Vl. Conclusion Based on the above analysis, an Addendum to the 1999 PEIR is appropriate to address the environmental effects of the three (3) biosolids contracts. As documented in this Addendum, the biosolids hauling component of each contract would result in the same environmental effects that were discussed and disclosed in the 1999 PEIR. The number of additional haul truck trips fall within the significant increase in haul truck trips that the 1999 PEIR assumed would occur in conjunction with OCSD's long range biosolids management plan. Moreover, as documented in the "route specific" traffic analysis that was conducted, any potential traffic impacts that would result from the nominal increase in truck trips to Tule Ranch will be less than significant, which is consistent with the 1999 PEIR's conclusion. As it relates to potential environmental effects at the receiver sites, each of these sites have been fully permitted pursuant to CEQA by the applicable lead agency for those facilities. Tule Ranch was a fully operational and functioning land application site that was operating pursuant to 528774.1 16 OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM approved RWQCB permits that allow the land application of biosolids on approximately 5,900 acres in Kern and Kings County. Similarly, the EnerTech and Synagro facilities have been fully permitted to process biosolids at their respective locations. At no point during the three (3) year period after the Board approved the 2000 Contract, did OCSD biosolids cause Tule Ranch to exceed its maximum permitted capacity. In addition, the quantity of biosolids that will be hauled to the EnerTech and Synagro facilities is well within the permitted processing capabilities of both facilities. 529774.1 17 OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM APPENDIX A Biosolid Hauling Traffic Impacts Analysis, Tule Ranch, July 2006 528774.1 18 Report Biosolids Hauling Traffic Impact Analysis Tule Ranch Prepared for Orange County Sanitation District July 2006 Prepared by t Q14- rN, c-01 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 TB0720060035C01SS316.DOC1061880005 Contents Section Page Acronyms.............................................................................................................................................ii 1.0 Background.............................................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction and Purpose............................................................................................1 1.2 Proposed Biosolids Hauling.........................................................................................1 2.0 Traffic Analysis......................................................................................................................3 2.1 Approach........................................................................................................................3 2.2 Route Selection Process.................................................................................................3 2.3 AnaIysis Assumptions..................................................................................................4 2.4 Existing Conditions.......................................................................................................5 2.5 No-Haul Analysis..........................................................................................................7 2.6 Haul Analysis...............................................................................................................10 2.7 Cumulative Traffic Impacts.......................................................................................10 3.0 CEQA Analysis....................................................................................................................12 4.0 References.............................................................................................................................15 Tables 1 Roadway Segments from Plant No.1 and Plant No.2 to Tule Ranch Sites in KernCounty...............................................................................................................................4 2 Traffic Characteristics of the Affected Roadway Segments.................................................6 3 2006 Truck Volumes and Passenger Car Equivalents..........................................................7 4 2006 No-Haul LOS Projections per Arterial and Freeway Segments.................................8 5 LOS Criteria for Basic Freeway Segments..............................................................................9 6 Example of Maximum Service Volumes by Urban Streets by LOS....................................9 7 Two-Lane Highway Classes.....................................................................................................9 8 2006 With-Haul Scenario LOS Projections...........................................................................11 Figure 1 Truck Route from Plant No.1 and Plant No.2 to Tule Ranch Sites in KernCounty...............................................................................................................................2 TB072006W=01=16=06188M I Acronyms ADT average daily traffic Caltrans California Department of Transportation CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CMA Congestion Management Agency CMP Congestion Management Plan D directional split factor EIR Environmental Impact Report GP general purpose HCM Highway Capacity Manual 2000 HOV high-occupancy vehicle I Interstate K peak hour flow factor LOS level of service OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority PCE passenger car equivalent PEIR 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report PHV peak hour volume Plant No. 1 Reclamation Plant No. 1 Plant No.2 Treatment Plant No.2 Sanitation District Orange County Sanitation District SEIR Subsequent Environmental Impact Report SR State Route TRB Transportation Research Board V/C volume-to-capacity ratio vph vehicles per hour TB072006003ScaSS316.o0G061880005 1 .0 Background 1.1 Introduction and Purpose The Orange County Sanitation District(Sanitation District)operates and maintains two wastewater treatment plants located in Orange County,California. Reclamation Plant No. 1 (Plant No. 1) is located on Ellis Avenue, in Fountain Valley.Treatment Plant No.2(Plant No.2) is located on Brookhurst Street, in Huntington Beach.This report summarizes the forecasted traffic impacts associated with biosolids-hauling trucks traveling from Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 in Orange County to the Tule Ranch sites in Kern County,California. The Tule Ranch sites in Kern County are operated under General Waste Discharge Requirements from the State Water Resources Control Board,and under site-specific Waste Discharge Requirements from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. The purpose of this traffic analysis is to determine whether biosolids truck hauling operations will affect level of service(LOS)on the routes between Sanitation District plants and Tule Ranch sites in Kern County.The analysis includes an assessment of the LOS on regional and local roadways with and without the addition of the biosolids-hauling trucks. LOS is defined by a volume-to-capacity ratio(V/C) ranging from A(V/C ratio 0.0 to 0.6) to F(V/C ratio over 1.0). Levels A through C are generally considered good operating conditions with only minor delays;LOS D is considered a fair operating condition with drivers occasionally having to wait through more than one signal at the intersection;LOS E includes longer delays with more common occurrences of drivers waiting through more than one signal;and LOS F is considered to have conditions of restricted flow. An assessment of the significance of potential traffic impacts was completed using the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)Environmental Checklist(Appendix G, CEQA Guidelines) for Traffic and Transportation.This report documents the methodology used and the LOS assessment and findings of this traffic impact analysis. 1.2 Proposed Biosolids Hauling The proposed hauling of a combined total of 10 truck loads per day of biosolids from Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 in Orange County to Tule Ranch sites in Kern County is evaluated herein.The truck trips were considered in the Sanitation District's 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report(PEIR) (Sanitation District,1999),but the route from the Sanitation District plants to the Tule Ranch sites in Kern County were not analyzed. For the purpose of this specific traffic analysis, truck trips would be using the route segments connecting Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 in Orange County to Tule Ranch sites in Kern County. Biosolids-hauling trucks would depart from Plant No.1 and Plant No.2 and travel to the three Tule Ranch sites located on Garces Highway west of Delano,which is in unincorporated Kern County.The nearest site is located at Corcoran Road and Garces Highway;the farthest site is at Garces Highway and Scofield Avenue.Trucks would travel through Orange,Los Angeles,and Kern Counties(see Figure 1). TB072006003SCO1SS316.DOC1061680005 1 1.0 BACKGROUND FIGURE I Truck Route from Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 to Tule Ranch Sites in Kern County (D3 Tule Ranch Sites -,,i Lre Rd ik kiUxb.Rd I 2 "3s:: KaWmRd 0 LardbHWf Lew HwT ELefthwy CDs lbSbridirdRd 4;, �kd Loren Rd McKftdHoy Roxd*fty N Palridale Adelanto Vctml#e Apple Valley Hesperia San Bernardino Barra At,nca Lt.F1, Lo5 An Qevs Riverside Long 5!- 11 Howl WeEl,,— I B072006003SCOISS316.DOC1061880005 2 f 2.0 Traffic Analysis 2.1 Approach The traffic analysis includes an assessment of the route segments connecting the Sanitation District plants in Orange County with Tule Ranch sites in Kern County.The traffic analysis approach is as follows: • The affected roadways include both arterial and freeway facilities. • Freeway impacts are evaluated for segments of freeway that are generally not more than 10 miles in length in the densely populated areas and 40 miles in length in the rural areas. • Traffic volumes for each freeway segment are analyzed as peak hour volume(PHV) values for the highest-volume portion of each segment. • The analysis of potential traffic impacts is based on the methodology in the Highivay Capacity Manual 2000(HCM) (Transportation Research Board [TRB],2000). Volumes and capacities are determined for the highest-volume portions of each freeway segment,and a corresponding LOS assessment is made. Adjustments for truck factors(passenger car equivalents[PCEs])are included in the V/C calculations.Similar calculations are completed for the arterials. • The biosolids hauling design year is the current year since trucks currently haul biosolids to Tule Ranch sites in Kern County.Traffic volumes for the design year(2006) are determined by extrapolating the current data. • Traffic counts are obtained through the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)and local jurisdictions for the year 2004,which is the latest available. • Analysis includes a base case without the proposed biosolids hauling(No-Haul scenario)and operations with the hauling(Haul scenario). The traffic analysis is comprised of five major steps: route selection process,analysis assumptions,existing conditions,No-Haul analysis,and Haul analysis.These steps are described in the following sections. 2.2 Route Selection Process Trucks will travel from Plant No.1 and Plant No.2 to Tule Ranch sites in Kem County. Figure 1 illustrates the route currently used by truck drivers for hauling biosolids from Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 to Tule Ranch sites in Kern County.Tables 1 and 2 summarize the roadway segments for each trip.It is anticipated that the current route will continue to be used. TB072006003SCOISS316AOC1061880005 3 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE 1 Roadway Segments from Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 to Tule Ranch Sites in Kern County Segment Plant Route Node Length Total Distance No. Origin No.' No. From To Direction (miles) (miles) 1 2 Brookhurst Plant No.2 1405 North 4.6 4.6 2 1,2 405 Plant No. 1 SR-22 North 7.5 12.1 3 1,2 405 SR-22 1-605 North 3.4 15.5 4 1,2 605 1-405 SR-91 North 6.6 22.1 5 1,2 605 SR-91 1-105 North 2.6 24.7 6 1,2 605 1-105 1-5 North 1.9 26.6 7 1,2 5 1-605 1-710 North 7 33.6 8 1,2 5 1-710 1-10 East North 3 36.6 9 1,2 5 1-10 East 1-10 West North 1.7 38.3 10 1,2 5 1-10 West SR-1 10 North 2 40.3 11 1,2 5 SR-110 SR-2 North 2.1 42.4 12 1,2 5 SR-2 SR-134 North 4.3 46.7 13 1,2 5 SR-134 SR-170 North 9.5 56.2 14 1,2 5 SR-170 SR-118 North 3 59.2 15 1,2 5 SR-118 1-405 North 2.2 61.4 16 1,2 5 1-405 1-210 North 2.1 63.5 17 1,2 5 1-210 SR-14 North 1.85 65.35 18 1,2 5 SR-14 SR-126 North 9.85 75.2 19 1,2 5 SR-126 SR-138 North 26.5 101.7 20 1,2 5 SR-138 SR-99 North 22.7 124.4 21 1,2 5 SR-99 SR-58 North 36.1 160.5 22 1,2 5 SR-58 SR-46 North 20.7 181.2 23 1,2 46 1-5 Corcoran East 4.3 185.5 24 1,2 Corcoran SR-46 Garces North 10 195.5 25 1,2 Garces Corcoran Scofield East 10 205.5 'The Origin Plant No. indicates the plant from which the trucks originated. 2.3 Analysis Assumptions The following assumptions are used in the traffic analysis. The number of biosolids-hauling trucks from Plant No.1 and Plant No.2 to the Tule Ranch sites in Kern County is assumed to be a combined total of 10 trucks per day,based on estimates provided by Sanitation District. As a conservative assumption,all trucks are assumed to be traveling during the a.m.peak hour,in the same lane of the peak direction. The exact timing and combination of trucks departing each facility could vary.For this reason,the worst-case scenario of truck departure combinations is analyzed,and assumes TB072006003$COISS316.DOC/06188OW5 4 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS that all 10 trucks per day would depart Plant No.1 or Plant No.2 during the same peak hour.This assumption ensures that the maximum possible truck traffic impacts are assessed for each segment of the route. Additionally, biosolids-hauling trucks are assumed to use general purpose(GP) lanes throughout their entire trip to the Tule Ranch sites in Kern County and back. Traffic flow on high-occupancy vehicle(HOV) lanes is set at capacity(1,500 vehicles per hour per lane)'.The directional split factor(D)2 on the urban and rural streets is assumed to be 60 percent and applies to Brookhurst Street,Corcoran Road,and Garces Highway. A peak hour flow factor(K)3 of 9 percent is used for Brookhurst Street,and 10 percent on Corcoran Road and Garces Highway due to their rural characteristics.Since truck data on Corcoran Road and Garces Highway were not available,they are assumed to be 35 percent of the average daily traffic(ADT),based on typical values of truck percentages on surrounding roads, such as State Route(SR)-33,SR-46,and SR434. 2.4 Existing Conditions Traffic data were obtained from Caltrans(2004)and Kern County (2006).Traffic data were available for the years 2002,2003,and 2004. Volumes for the year 2006 are extrapolated using the available data. Table 2 provides a summary of the characteristics of the analyzed route segments along the route from the Sanitation District plants to the Tule Ranch sites in Kern County. Table 2 identifies the number of GP lanes and HOV lanes along each segment.For traffic,the data include the annual ADT and truck volumes, peak hour traffic volumes,directional split of traffic in each direction (D),and the percentage of traffic in the peak hour(K). The HCM uses the concept of PCEs to account for the influence of trucks in traffic.For this analysis, truck volumes are converted into PCEs using the HCM procedures.The analysis is summarized in Table 3.First,the directional split factor(D) is used to convert truck flow in both directions to truck volumes in the peak direction. Then, using the K factor,truck volumes in the peak direction are converted into flow per peak hour.Finally,using the HCM conversion factor for the overall truck population(1.5), peak hourly volumes of trucks are converted into PCEs per peak hour and peak direction.The difference between the truck volumes and the equivalent passenger cars,which is shown in the last column of Table 3,is the volume that needs to be added to the regular traffic volumes to account for trucks. 1 Report by the Legislative Analyst Office,January 2000,titled,HOV Lanes in California:Are They Achieving Their Goals? (Long,2000). 2 The proportion of vehicles traveling in the peak direction during the peak hour:Usually,this factor is used to convert average daily traffic(ADT)volumes for both directions to volumes in the peak direction,which is critical to the analysis. 3 The proportion of vehicles traveling during the peak hour:Using this factor,the peak hour volume in the peak direction is computed based on the ADT volume for that direction.The peak hour volume is used to obtain the LOS,using the methodologies in the HCM 2000 guidelines. 4 2004 Average Annual Daily Truck Traffic,California State Highway System(Caltrans,2005). TB072M6003SCOISS316.DOCI0618MM5 5 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE 2 Traffic Characteristics of the Affected Roadway Segments Segment Route GP Lanes/ HOV Lanes/ Peak Hour Traffic Trucks/ D K No. No. Dir Dir (Vehlhr) Day M M 1 Brookhurst 3 0 4,450 2,370 60.0 9.0 2 405 4 1 22,675 9,680 53.7 6.9 3 405 6 1 23,600 14,398 53.3 6.8 4 605 4 0 18,400 11,531 54.7 6.2 5 605 5 1 21,400 21,367 55.8 7.3 6 605 4 1 21,100 31,171 55.8 7.3 7 5 4 0 15,800 21,028 57.4 5.8 8 5 5 0 16,400 20,285 54.1 5.9 9 5 5 0 16,600 19,276 51.5 6.5 10 5 5 0 16,700 18,305 53.5 6.4 11 5 5 0 19,250 18,134 52.5 6.4 12 5 5 0 19,500 18,649 53.5 6.4 13 5 5 0 18,300 18,739 57.8 7.1 14 5 5 0 22,200 23,186 53.6 6.6 15 5 5 0 10,600 12,136 58.2 6.9 16 5 5 0 18,250 17,177 61.2 7.0 17 5 5 0 19,800 22,217 64.0 6.8 18 5 4 0 18,800 19,009 58.5 8.1 19 5 3 0 8,800 17,576 59.2 11.8 20 5 3 0 8,900 18,993 51.1 12.7 21 5 2 0 5,300 10,285 50.2 16.6 22 5 2 0 5,400 10,472 50.8 14.5 23 46 1 0 510 2,242 60.3 8.4 24 Corcoran 1 0 52 182 60.0 10.0 25 Garces 1 0 50 175 60.0 10.0 Source:Caltrans,2004; Kern County,2006; Google Earth,2006;and CH2M HILL calculations. T8072006003ScotSS316.00cr06188M 6 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE 3 2006 Truck Volumes and Passenger Car Equivalents PCE Segment Route Trucks/ D Trucks/ K Trucks/ PCE/ due to No. No. Day (%) Day/Dir (%) Peak Hour Lane 1 Hr Trucks 1 Brookhurst 2,370 60.0 1,422 9.00 128 192 64 2 405 9,680 53.7 5,198 6.9 356 534 178 3 405 14,396 53.3 7,668 6.8 518 778 260 4 605 11,531 54.7 6,309 6.2 394 591 197 5 605 21,367 55.8 11,929 7.3 871 1306 435 6 605 31,171 55.8 17,403 7.3 1,270 1,906 636 7 5 21,028 57.4 12,072 5.8 703 1,054 351 8 5 20,285 54.1 10,968 5.9 651 977 326 9 5 19,276 51.5 9,929 6.5 641 962 321 10 5 18,305 53.5 9,799 6.4 626 939 313 11 5 18,134 52.5 9,520 6.4 609 914 305 12 5 18,649 53.5 9,983 6.4 638 957 319 13 5 18,739 57.8 10,837 7.1 764 1,146 382 14 5 23,186 53.6 12,418 6.6 820 1,229 409 15 5 12,136 58.2 7,066 6.9 488 731 243 16 5 17,177 61.2 10,516 7.0 731 1,096 365 17 5 22,217 64.0 14,216 6.8 970 1,454 484 18 5 19,009 58.5 11,113 8.1 905 1,357 452 19 5 17,576 59.2 10,398 11.8 1,229 1,844 615 20 5 18,993 51.1 9,704 12.7 1,236 1,854 618 21 5 10,285 50.2 5,166 16.6 859 1,288 429 22 5 10,472 50.8 5,320 14.5 770 1,155 385 23 46 2,242 60.3 1,352 8.35 113 169 56 24 Corcoran 184 60.0 110 10.0 11 17 6 25 Garces 176 60.0 106 10.0 11 16 5 Source:Caltrans,2004; Kern County,2006;and CH2M HILL calculations. 2.5 No-Haul Analysis The No-Haul analysis estimates traffic volumes without the proposed biosolids hauling.The 2004 traffic volumes described in Section 2.4 are converted to 2006 volumes by applying an average annual growth rate of 0.8 percent.Table 4 is a summary of the LOS calculation for the 2006 No-Haul scenario. The volume in the HOV lanes and the PCE columns,factoring in the truck volumes,are used to determine the PCE volumes in the peak direction in the GP lanes.The peak PCEs per hour per lane are computed and used to determine the LOS. T6072006=COISS316.DOC/061880005 7 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS The LOS grades(A through F) are based on the criteria presented in the HCM.The criteria for freeway segments are summarized in Table 5;for urban streets(Brookhurst Street segment), refer to Table 6.Based on Table 7(Exhibit 12-10 of the HCM), the SR-46 segment is considered a CIass I two-lane highway. Corcoran Road and Garces Highway segments are considered Class II two-lane highways.The capacity of a two-lane highway is estimated to be 17,000 PCE/hour/lane, based on the HCM.Specific estimates of LOS are not available, but given the volumes on these roadways,LOS C or better is expected. TABLE 4 2006 No-Haul LOS Projections per Arterial and Freeway Segments Peak Hour PCE Segment Route Traffic/ HOV Flow/ due PCE/ PCE/ LOS No. No. Peak Dir Hr/Dir to Trucks Hr/Dir Hr/Lane (HCM) 1 Brookhurst 2,692 0 64 2,756 919 F 2 405 12,278 1,500 178 10,956 2,739 F 3 405 12,674 1,500 260 11,434 1,906 D 4 605 10,151 0 197 10,348 2,587 F 5 605 12,047 1,500 435 10,982 2,196 E 6 605 11,878 1,500 636 11,014 2,753 F 7 5 9,146 0 351 9,498 2,374 F 8 5 8,941 0 326 9,267 1,853 D 9 5 8,622 0 321 8,942 1,788 D 10 5 9,014 0 313 9,327 1,865 D 11 5 10,190 0 305 10,495 2,099 E 12 5 10,525 0 319 10,844 2,169 E 13 5 10,671 0 382 11,053 2,211 E 14 5 11,989 0 409 12,399 2,480 F 15 5 6,223 0 243 6,466 1,293 C 16 5 11,266 0 365 11,631 2,326 E 17 5 12,776 0 484 13,260 2,652 F 18 5 11,082 0 452 11,534 2,884 F 19 5 5,249 0 615 5,864 1,955 D 20 5 4,585 0 618 5,203 1,734 D 21 5 2,684 0 429 3,114 1,557 C 22 5 2,766 0 385 3,151 1,575 C 23 46 310 0 56 366 366 >C 24 Corcoran 31 0 6 37 37 >C 25 Garces 30 0 5 36 36 >C TB072006003SCorsS316.DOC1061880005 8 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE 5 LOS Criteria for Basic Freeway Segments LOS Criteria A B C D E Free Flow Speed (FFS)=65 mi/hr Maximum Density(pc/mi/lane) 11 18 26 35 45 Minimum Speed(mi/hr) 65.0 65.0 64.6 59.7 52.2 Maximum V/C 0.30 0.50 0.71 0.89 1.00 Maximum Service Flow Rate(pc/hr/lane) 710 1,170 1,830 2,090 2,350 Source: HCM(TRB,2000),excerpted from Exhibit 23-2. Note: LOS F is over-saturation of the freeway capacity. TABLE 6 Example of Maximum Service Volumes by Urban Streets by LOS Class II Lanes A B C D E 1 N/A N/A 670 850 890 2 N/A N/A 1,470 1,700 1,780 3 N/A N/A 2,280 2,550 2,670 4 N/A N/A 3,090 3,400 3,560 Source: HCM(TRB,2000),excerpted from Exhibit 10-7. N/A: Not Applicable—Urban streets operate at LOS C. LOS numbers indicate threshold volumes or worse, by definition. For example, 900 vehicles on a one-lane facility is LOS F, because 900 exceeds the 890 service volume limit for LOS E. TABLE 7 Two-Lane Highway Classes Class Description I Highways on which motorists expect to travel at relatively high speeds,including major intercity routes, primary arterials,and daily commuter routes. II Highways on which motorists do not necessarily expect to travel at high speeds,including access routes,scenic and recreational routes,which are not primarily arterials,and routes through rugged terrain. Source: HCM(TRB,2000), Exhibit 12-10. "The LOS for Class I highways on which efficient mobility is paramount is defined in terms of both percent time- spent-following and average travel speed. On Class II highways,mobility is less critical,and LOS is defined only in terms of percent-time-spent-following." T13072006003SCasS316.130C106188M 9 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 2.6 Haul Analysis A worst-case scenario was adopted for the analysis of the proposed biosolids hauling.This worst-case assumption is that all trucks will be in the same lane,within the a.m. peak hour, and traveling in the same direction,with a total of 15 PCEs added to the haul volumes. Using this assumption,the LOS of each segment is calculated for the Haul scenario,which accounts for the additional biosolids-hauling trucks. A PCE of 1.5 is the appropriate factor considering overall roadway route grades. A refined level of study would incorporate slope conditions of individual segments.The volumes and LOS are summarized in Table 8.Even by considering the worst-case scenario,the percent increase in peak PCEs per hour per lane is less than 1.5 percent on all freeway segments and less than 2 percent on the arterial segments in Orange County.There are no changes in LOS on these facilities.The percentage changes in volumes on the two-lane roadways(SR-46,Corcoran Road,and Garces Highway)are higher,but the LOS will remain C or better. 2.7 Cumulative Traffic Impacts The PEIR(Sanitation District,1999)analyzed the environmental impacts of biosolids hauling over the next 20 years.Potential traffic impacts associated with biosolids hauling operations from both Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 were found to be less than significant with mitigation. Additionally,traffic impacts associated with increased biosolids and chemical truck trips on the regional transportation network,especially on freeways such as Interstate(I)405 and I-5,were found to be less than significant with mitigation. On May 25,2005,the Sanitation District Board of Directors certified the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(SEIR)for the Secondanj Treatment and Plant Improvement Project (Sanitation District,2005).The SEIR analyzed the environmental impacts of numerous improvements at Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 required to achieve secondary treatment standards.The SEIR found that the operations impacts would not substantially increase traffic levels over existing conditions or road capacity.The cumulative traffic impacts of the increased biosolids truck trips from and to both Plant No.1 and Plant No.2 were found to be less than significant with mitigation because(1) the total truck volumes were low compared to the existing traffic on the roads adjacent to the plants,and (2)the proposed mitigation measures would limit truck trips to off-peak hours,when possible. The proposed biosolids hauling from Sanitation District plants to the Tule Ranch sites in Kern County is part of the implementation of the 1999 Strategic Plan and the Secondary Treatment and Plant Improvement Project.In this regard, the biosolids hauling to the Tule Ranch sites in Kern County is only part of the ultimate biosolids hauling that was identified and evaluated in the PEIR and SEIR(Sanitation District,1999 and 2005).The proposed biosolids hauling to the Tule Ranch sites in Kern County would not result in a new cumulative traffic impact from that identified in the PEIR and SEIR. Ts072008003SC0/SS316.D0C106188= 10 20 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE 8 2006 With-Haul Scenario LOS Projections VIC V/C PCE/Hr/ PCE/Hr I Ratio Ratio LOS Lane Lane No- With Percent LOS With- Segment Route No-Haul With-Haul Haul Haul Increase No-Haul Haul No. No. (2008) (2008) (2008) (2008 M (2008) (2008) 1 Brookhurst 919 934 1.033 1.049 1.6 F F 2 405 2,739 2,754 1.166 1.172 0.5 F F 3 405 1,906 1,921 0.811 0.817 0.8 D D 4 605 2,587 2,602 1.101 1.107 0.6 F F 5 605 2,196 2,211 0.934 0,941 0.7 E E 6 605 2,753 2,768 1.171 1.178 0.5 F F 7 5 2,374 2,389 1.010 1.017 0.6 F F 8 5 1,853 1,868 0.789 0.795 0.8 D D 9 5 1,788 1,803 0.761 0.767 0.8 D D 10 5 1,865 1,880 0.794 0.800 0.8 D D 11 5 2,099 2,114 0.893 0.900 0.7 E E 12 5 2,169 2,184 0.923 0,929 0.7 E E 13 5 2,211 2,226 0.941 0,947 0.7 E E 14 5 2,480 2,495 1.055 1.062 0.6 F F 15 5 1,293 1,308 0.550 0.557 1.2 C C 16 5 2,326 2,341 0.990 0.996 0.6 E E 17 5 2,652 2,667 1.129 1.135 0.6 F F 18 5 2,884 2,899 1,227 1.234 0.5 F F 19 5 1,955 1,970 0.832 0.838 0.8 D D 20 5 1,734 1,749 0.738 0.744 0.9 D D 21 5 1,557 1,572 0.663 0.669 1.0 C C 22 5 1,575 1,590 0.670 0.677 1.0 C C 23 46 366 381 0.229 0.238 4.1 >C >C 24 Corcoran 37 52 0.032 0.046 40.5 >C >C 25 Garces 36 51 0.032 0.045 41.7 >C >C V/C ratio is obtained using the following capacities per lane as provided by HCM(TRB,2000): Freeway Capacity=2,350 vehicles per hour(vph)(Exhibit 23-2). Two-Lane Highway Capacity=1,600 vph(Chapter 20). Class I Street=1,140 vph(Exhibit 10-7). Class II Street=890 vph(Exhibit 10-7). TB072006003SCOISS316.DOC/061BM5 11 3.0 CEQA Analysis The transportation criteria provided in the CEQA Environmental Checklist(Appendix G, CEQA Guidelines)were used to determine the potential significance of impacts related to biosolids hauling.The criteria and responses are provided below. 1) Could the Project cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? The traffic analysis findings are that there are no significant effects on the LOS or traffic operations.Even with the worst-case scenario,where all the trucks depart the treatment plants to the Tule Ranch sites in Kern County at the same time,the percent change in volumes on the analyzed route segments is less than 1.5 percent of the freeway segments and less than 2 percent on the arterial segments.On the two-lane segments,there are higher percentages of volume changes, but the overall volumes are low.These increases will cause no measurable effects on the operations or the LOS of the analyzed segments. Furthermore,the potential traffic impact associated with proposed hauling to the Tule Ranch sites in Kern County is consistent with that identified in the PEIR and SEIR. 2) Could the project exceed, either individually or cumulatively,a level of service standard established by the counhj congestion manageiiient agency for designated roads or highways? The biosolids hauling process involves truck trips from Orange County to Kern County, passing through Los Angeles County.The LOS standards established by the Congestion Management Agencies(CMAs)of the three counties are listed below and checked against the LOS for each segment. Orange County The 2003 update of Orange County's Congestion Management Plan(CMP)states that,"The majority of local governments in Orange County designated the Orange County Transportation Authority(OCTA)as the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) for the county.Since then,OCTA has been charged with the development, monitoring and biennial updating of Orange County CMP.The goals of Orange County's CMP are to reduce traffic congestion and provide a mechanism for coordinating land use and development decisions...Traffic Level of Service(LOS) standards are to be established for a system of highways and roadways designated by the agency.The system shall include at a minimum all state highways and principal arterials... Level of Service shall be measured by Circular 212(or by the most recent version of the Highway Capacity Manual),or by a uniform methodology adopted by the agency which is consistent with the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)... Within the defined CMP highway network,intersections and freeway segments are not allowed to deteriorate to a condition which is worse than LOS E,or the base year LOS if worse than E,without mitigation being prescribed in an acceptable deficiency plan.In the case of base conditions reflecting a LOS worse than E,'existing LOS' is defined as any increase in V/C ratio of up to 0.10 over the TB072006003SC0lSS318AOC106168M 12 3.0 CEOA ANALYSIS base condition. V/C ratio increases beyond 0.10 above the base condition are considered not to comply with CMP LOS objectives and shall require mitigation or a deficiency plan." Based on the calculations in this analysis,the increase in V/C with the proposed biosolids hauling is 0.005 (approximately 1/2 percent).The increases in V/C ratio are significantly less than 10 percent(0.10). Therefore,there are no impacts to the LOS standards for Orange County. Los Angeles County California Government Code Section 65089(b)(1) states that the Level of Service Element shall"in no case be less than the level of service E or the current level, whichever is farthest from level of service A. When the level of service on a segment or at an intersection fails to attain the established level of service standard,a deficiency plan shall be adopted pursuant to Section 65089.4." This is part of the Los Angeles County General Plan. Also,Objective 2.3 of the Los Angeles County CMP sets level of service standards that provide a reasonable balance between mobility and the cost of building and operating the transportation system... Establish level of service E or the current level,whichever is farthest from LOS A,as the LOS standard for intersections or segments on the CMP system of roadways... If the LOS was F, then a 10 percent or more degradation in the quantitative measure used to determine the LOS(such as delay, V/C,or travel speed)will comprise a deficiency, which must be addressed by a deficiency plan." Similar to Orange County,there are no predicted changes in LOS,and the increases in V/C ratio are significantly Iess than 10 percent(0.10).Therefore,there are no impacts to the LOS standards for Los Angeles County. Kern County The circulation element is one of seven elements mandated by the State of California Government Code 65302(b)to be included in general plan of local governments.Kern County's 5th objective of its circulation element is to maintain a minimum LOS of D for all roads throughout the County.No specific guidance is given for mainline freeway segments.Since the additional biosolids truck volumes are small and do not affect the overall LOS,no impacts to Kern County LOS standards are expected. 3) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in siibstantial safety risk? The proposed biosolids hauling would have no effect on air traffic patterns.Therefore, there are no impacts associated with this element of the CEQA checklist. 4) Substantially increase Hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sluirp curves or dangerous intersections)or incoinpatible uses (e.g.,farin equipment)? The proposed biosolids hauling would have no effect on design.Therefore,there are no impacts associated with this element of the CEQA checklist. TB072006003SCOISS316,DOC/06188M 13 3.0 CEQA ANALYSIS 5) Result in inadequate emergency access? The proposed biosolids hauling would have no effect on emergency access.Therefore, there are no impacts associated with this element of the CEQA checklist. 6) Result in inadequate parking capacity? The proposed biosolids hauling would have no effect on parking.Therefore,there are no impacts associated with this element of the CEQA checklist. 7) Conflict 71 ith adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus hernouts, bicycle racks)? The proposed biosolids hauling would have no effect on adopted policies, plans, or programs.Therefore,there are no impacts associated with this element of the CEQA checklist. TB072005(MSCO/SS316.DOC1061880005 14 4.0 References California Department of Transportation(Caltrans).2004. All Traffic Volumes on California State Highway System.www.dot.ca.gov/fig/traffops/saferesr/trafdata/2004all.htm. Accessed June 2006. .2005. 2004 Average Annual Daily Truck Traffic, California State Highway Systeni. .2006.Traffic data for the years 2002,2003,and 2004. h!W://wwww.dot.ca. og v/hg/traffops/saferesr/trafdata/2004a]l.htm. Accessed June 2006. Google Earth.2006.littp: /earth.google.com. Accessed June 2006. Kern County.2006.Roads Department.Traffic data for the years 2002,2003,and 2004. httR://www.co.kern.ca.us/roads[. Accessed June 2006. Long,Rebecca.2000.Legislative Analyst Office,California s Nonpartisan Fiscal and Policy Advisor.HOV Lanes in California:Are They Achieving Their Goals?January. http://www,.Iao.ca.gov/2000/010700_hov/010700 hov_lanes.html Orange County Sanitation District.1999. 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report(PEIR). .2005. Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Secondary Treatment and Plant Improvement Project. May 25. Transportation Research Board (TRB),of the National Academy of Sciences.2000.Highway Capacity Manual 2000. T8072006003SC01SS316.DOC1061880005 15 OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM APPENDIX B Biosolids HaulingTraffic Impacts Analysis, South Kern Industrial Center, July 2006 528774.1 19 Report Biosolids Hauling Traffic Impact Analysis South Kern Industrial Center Prepared for Orange County Sanitation District July 2006 Prepared by Q���tn PgaF S 4 y� 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 TB072006003SCOISKIC_SS315.DOC]0619B0004 Contents Section Page Acronyms.............................................................................................................................................ii 1.0 Background.................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction and Purpose..............................................................................................1 1.2 Proposed Biosolids Hauling..........................................................................................1 2.0 Traffic Analysis..........................................................................................................................3 2.1 Approach..........................................................................................................................3 2.2 Route Selection Process..................................................................................................3 2.3 Analysis Assumptions....................................................................................................4 2.4 Existing Conditions.........................................................................................................5 2.5 No-Haul Analysis............................................................................................................6 2.6 Haul Analysis...................................................................................................................9 2.7 Cumulative Traffic Impacts.........................................................................................10 3.0 CEQA Analysis........................................................................................................................12 4.0 References.................................................................................................................................15 Tables 1 Roadway Segments from Plant No.1 and Plant No.2 to SIQC...........................................4 2 Traffic Characteristics of the Affected Roadway Segments..................................................6 3 2006 Truck Volumes and Passenger Car Equivalents...........................................................7 4 2006 No-Haul LOS per Roadway Segment.............................................................................8 5 LOS Criteria for Basic Freeway Segments...............................................................................8 6 Example of Maximum Service Volumes for Urban Streets by LOS....................................9 7 Two-Lane Highway Classes......................................................................................................9 8 2006 Haul Scenario LOS Projections per Roadway Segment.............................................10 Figure 1 Truck Route from Plant No.1 and Plant No.2 to SKIC........................................................2 T8072006003SCO/SKIC SS315DOG061880004 I Acronyms ADT average daily traffic Caltrans California Department of Transportation CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CMA Congestion Management Agency CMP Congestion Management Plan D directional split factor EIR Environmental Impact Report GP general purpose HCM Highway Capacity Manual 2000 HOV high-occupancy vehicle I Interstate K peak hour flow factor LOS level of service OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority PCE passenger car equivalent PEIR 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report PHV peak hour volume Plant No. 1 Reclamation Plant No.1 Plant No.2 Treatment Plant No.2 Sanitation District Orange County Sanitation District SEIR Subsequent Environmental Impact Report SKIC South Kern Industrial Center SR State Route TRB Transportation Research Board V/C volume-to-capacity ratio vph vehicles per hour TB072006003SCO1SKIC_SS315.0001081880004 II 1 .0 Background 1.1 Introduction and Purpose The Orange County Sanitation District(Sanitation District) operates and maintains two wastewater treatment plants located in Orange County,California.Reclamation Plant No. 1 (Plant No. 1) is located on Ellis Avenue, in Fountain Valley.Treatment Plant No.2 (Plant No.2) is located on Brookhurst Street,in Huntington Beach.This report summarizes the forecasted traffic impacts associated with biosolids-hauling trucks traveling from Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 to the South Kern Industrial Center(SKIC)Compost Facility in Kern County,California.The environmental impacts associated with receiving biosolids at the SKIC were evaluated in the Supplement to the Environmental Impact Report(EIR)for the SKIC Specific Plan,adopted on June 29,2004 (Kern County,2004). The purpose of this traffic analysis is to determine whether biosolids truck hauling operations will affect the level of service(LOS)on the routes between Sanitation District plants and SKIC.The analysis includes an assessment of the LOS on regional and local roadways with and without the addition of the biosolids-hauling trucks.LOS is defined by a volume-to-capacity ratio(V/C)ranging from A(V/C ratio 0.0 to 0.6)to F(V/C ratio over 1.0).Levels A through C are generally considered good operating conditions with only minor delays;LOS D is considered a fair operating condition with drivers occasionally having to wait through more than one signal at the intersection;LOS E includes longer delays with more common occurrences of drivers waiting through more than one signal; and LOS F is considered to have conditions of restricted flow. An assessment of the significance of potential traffic impacts was completed using the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)Environmental Checklist(Appendix G,CEQA Guidelines) for Traffic and Transportation.This report documents the methodology used,as well as the LOS assessment and findings of this traffic impact analysis. 1.2 Proposed Biosolids Hauling The proposed hauling of a combined total of 10 truck loads per day of biosolids from Plant No.1 and Plant No.2 in Orange County to SKIC in Kern County is evaluated herein.The truck trips were considered in the 1999 Strategic Plan Progranc Environmental hupact Report (PEIR) (Sanitation District,1999), but the route from the Sanitation District plants to SKIC was not analyzed. For the purpose of this specific traffic analysis,truck trips would be using the route segments connecting the origin plants in Orange County to the destination SKIC Compost Facility in Kern County. Biosolids-hauling trucks would depart from PIant No.1 and Plant No.2 and travel to SKIC located on the newly constructed Santiago Road in Bakersfield,which is in Kern County.Trucks would travel through Orange,Los Angeles, and Kern Counties(see Figure 1). T8072006003SOOISKIC SS315.DOG06188M 1.08ACKOROUND Figure 1 Truck Route from Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 to SKIC ford I f99f 122_3.' South Taft a �+, California City '; ® Tehachapi --' l North • SAN LUIS Madcopa t1T6h -K .E _R N Mojave " Edwards '�4 0 TJBISPO. Edwards :Boron ` NR Cu'ama �.. . �osamond, e ..-. • :- rs Like Lebec •`� 'Frazier Park :�� :>.' : : •'`:: - ' - . 4 .. ..........................:::... -3951- Los Padre's National Fofest �' Lancaster SANTA I Quart;Hill ( -. aSA BERNAR" BARBARA Palmdal Victorville Gibralar �` -�-`-vin Reservoir. `Sa ent Ojai �r f Santa k iClmore LOS ANGELES Mona,VEUTURA Hesp is to Paula, . Simi' t 2 ,;�: Barbara e p -- # -D2 )Ventiuf�i �_ Valley an Fernando., t 1o,a4$: Clxriard``�-- amanl ; ,` La Canad�lIII tridg"e Thousandbaks l27 ,� _. 734��� • sadena Mu Ana��pa �' ,f9j Hills Ea a11bu st q e �Rl f SI Manhattan"Beachn r , 1 ert rona— hatutel Islands Torrance 22 Via`"R SIDE P 1 c a e;a rf:. :Hun�ngton Bead a E1Sinor TB072000MCOISKIC_SS315.DOC1061880004 2 2.0 Traffic Analysis 2.1 Approach The traffic analysis includes an assessment of the route segments connecting the Sanitation District plants in Orange County with SKIC in Kern County.The traffic analysis approach is as follows: • The affected roadways include both arterial and freeway facilities. • Freeway impacts are evaluated for segments of freeway that are generally not more than 10 miles in length in the densely populated areas and 30 miles in length in the rural areas. • Traffic volumes for each freeway segment are analyzed as peak hour volume(PHV) values for the highest-volume portion of each segment. • The analysis of potential traffic impacts is based on the methodology in the Highway Capacihj Man:lal 2000(HCM) (Transportation Research Board [TRB],2000). Volumes and capacities are determined for the highest-volume portions of each freeway segment,and a corresponding LOS assessment is made. Adjustments for truck factors(passenger car equivalents [PCEs])are included in the V/C calculations.Similar calculations are completed for the arterials. • The biosolids hauling design year is the end of the current year since trucks are planned to haul biosolids to SKIC by November 2006. • Traffic counts are obtained through the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)and local jurisdictions for the year 2004,which is the latest available.Traffic volumes for the design year(2006)are determined by extrapolating these data. • Analysis includes a base case without the proposed biosolids hauling(No-Haul scenario)and operations with the hauling(Haul scenario). The traffic analysis is comprised of five major steps: route selection process,analysis assumptions,existing conditions,No-Haul analysis,and Haul analysis.These steps are described in the following sections. 2.2 Route Selection Process Trucks will travel from Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 to SKIC.Figure 1 illustrates the planned route that will be used by truck drivers to haul biosolids from Plant No.1 and Plant No.2 to SKIC.Table 1 summarizes the roadway segments along the planned route. T6072006003SCO1SKIC_SS315.DOC1061880004 3 20 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE 1 Roadway Segments from Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 to SKIC Segment Plant Route Node Length Total Distance No. Origin No. No. From To Direction (miles) (miles) 1 2 Brookhurst Plant#2 1405 North 4.6 4.6 2 1 405 Plant#1 SR-22 North 7.5 12.1 3 1,2 405 SR-22 1-605 West 3.4 15.5 4 1,2 405 1-605 1-710 North 7.5 23 5 1,2 405 1-710 1-110 North 5.3 28.3 6 1,2 405 1-110 1-105 North 8 36.3 7 1,2 405 I-105 1-10 North 8.4 44.7 8 1,2 405 1-10 SR-101 North 9.75 54.45 9 1,2 405 SR-101 1-5 North 9 63.45 10 1,2 5 1-405 1-210 North 2.1 65.55 11 1,2 5 1-210 SR-14 North 1.85 67.4 12 1,2 5 SR-14 SR-126 North 9.85 77.25 13 1,2 5 SR-126 SR-138 North 26.5 103.75 14 1,2 5 SR-138 SR-99 North 22.7 126.45 15 1,2 5 SR-99 Old River North 13.5 139.95 16 1,2 Old River 1-5 Millux North 1.3 141.25 17 1,2 Millux Old River Hill West 5 146.25 18 1,2 Hill Millux SKIC South 5.4 151.65 'The Plant Origin No.indicates the plant from which the trucks originated. 2.3 Analysis Assumptions The following assumptions are used in the traffic analysis. The number of biosolids-hauling trucks from PIant No. 1 and Plant No.2 to SKIC is assumed to be a combined total of 10 trucks per day,based on estimates provided by Sanitation District. As a conservative assumption,all trucks are assumed to be traveling during the a.m.peak hour, in the same lane of the peak direction.The number of trucks departing each facility is not known.Several combinations of truck departure schemes could be analyzed.However,the worst-case scenario is to assume that all 10 trucks per day will depart from one of the plants at the same time toward the renewable energy facility.This way, the maximum possible truck traffic impacts are assessed for each segment of the route. Additionally,biosolids-hauling trucks are assumed to use general purpose(GP) lanes throughout their entire trip to SKIC and back. TB072OD6003SCOISKIC SS315.000I06i88M 4 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Traffic flow on high-occupancy vehicle(HOV) lanes is set at capacity(1,500 vehicles per hour per lane)l as a conservative assumption. The directional split factor(D)2 on the urban and rural streets is assumed to be 60 percent and applies to Brookhurst Street,Old River Road, Millux Road,and Hill Road. A peak hour flow factor(K)3 of 9 percent is used for Brookhurst Street and 10 percent on Old River Road, Millux Road,and Hill Road due to their rural characteristics.Since truck data on the latter three roads were not available,they are assumed to be 25 percent of the average daily traffic(ADT),based on typical values of truck percentages on surrounding roads,such as State Route(SR)-223,SR-43,and SR-1194. 2.4 Existing Conditions Traffic data were obtained from Caltrans and Kern County websites(Caltrans,2004;Kern County,2006).Traffic data were available for the years 2002,2003,and 2004.Volumes for the year 2006 are extrapolated using the available data. Table 2 provides a summary of the characteristics of the analyzed segments along the route from the Sanitation District plants to SKIC. Table 2 identifies the number of GP lanes and HOV lanes along each segment.For traffic,the data include the average annual daily traffic and truck volumes, peak hour traffic volumes,directional split of traffic in each direction (D),and the percentage of traffic in the peak hour(K). The HCM uses the concept of passenger car equivalents(PCEs) to account for the influence of trucks in traffic. For this analysis,truck volumes are converted into PCEs using the HCM procedures.The analysis is summarized in Table 3. First,the directional split factor(D) is used to convert truck flow in both directions to truck volumes in the peak direction.Then,using the K factor,truck volumes in the peak direction are converted into flow per peak hour.Finally,using the HCM conversion factor for the overall truck population(1.5), peak hourly volumes of trucks are converted into PCEs per peak hour and peak direction. The difference between the truck volumes and the equivalent passenger cars,which is shown in the last column of Table 3, is the volume that needs to be added to the regular traffic volumes to account for trucks. 1 Report by the Legislative Analyst Office,January 2000,titled,HOV Lanes in California:Are They Achieving Their Goals? (Long,2000). 2 The proportion of vehicles traveling in the peak direction during the peak hour:Usually,this factor is used to convert average daily traffic(ADT)volumes for both directions to volumes in the peak direction,which is critical to the analysis. 3 The proportion of vehicles traveling during the peak hour:Using this factor,the peak hour volume in the peak direction is computed based on the ADT volume for that direction.The peak hour volume is used to obtain the LOS,according to HCM 2000 guidelines. 4 2004 Average Annual Daily Truck Traffic,California State Highway System(Caltrans,2005). TBO72006DD3SC01SKIC_SS315.DOC106188M 5 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE 2 Traffic Characteristics of the Affected Roadway Segments Segment Route GP Lanes/ HOV Lanes/ Peak Hour Traffic Trucks/ D K No. No. Dir Dir (Veh/hr) Day M M 1 Brookhurst 3 0 4,450 2,370 60.0 9.00 2 405 4 1 22,675 8,571 53.7 6.85 3 405 6 1 23,600 9,680 53.3 6.76 4 405 4 1 18,500 14,398 54.9 7.43 5 405 4 1 18,800 15,901 55.8 7.12 6 405 4 1 19,000 11,671 58.5 6.13 7 405 4 1 20,000 11,977 54.1 6.10 8 405 5 0 21,000 13,127 58.7 6.06 9 405 4 0 15,600 8,485 64.3 6.66 10 5 5 0 16,700 18.305 61.2 6.95 11 5 5 0 19,250 18,134 64.0 6.82 12 5 4 0 19,500 18,649 58.5 8.14 13 5 3 0 18,300 18,739 59.2 11.82 14 5 3 0 22,200 23,186 51.1 12.74 15 5 2 0 10,600 12,136 50.2 16.62 16 Old River 1 0 360 907 60.0 10.00 17 Millux 1 0 98 247 60.0 10.00 18 Hill 1 0 59 149 60.0 10.00 Source:Caltrans,2004; Kern County,2006; Google Earth,2006;and CH2M HILL calculations. 2.5 No-Haul Analysis The No-Haul analysis estimates traffic volumes without the proposed biosolids hauling.The 2004 traffic volumes described in Section 2.4 are converted to 2006 volumes by applying an average annual growth rate of 0.8 percent.Table 4 is a summary of the LOS calculation for the 2006 No-Haul scenario. The volume in the HOV lanes and the PCE columns,factoring in the truck volumes,are used to determine the PCE volumes in the peak direction in the GP lanes.The peak PCEs per hour per lane are computed and used to determine the LOS. TB072006003SCOISKIC_SS315.DOC1061880004 6 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE 3 2006 Truck Volumes and Passenger Car Equivalents PCE Segment Route Trucks/ D Trucks/ K Trucks/ PCEI due to No. No. Day (%) Day/Dir M Peak Hour Lane I Hr Trucks 1 Brookhurst 2,370 60.0 1,422 9.00 128 192 64 2 405 8,571 53.7 4,603 6.85 315 473 158 3 405 9,680 53.3 5,156 6.76 349 523 174 4 405 14,398 54.9 7,900 7.43 587 880 293 5 405 15,901 55.9 8,889 7.12 633 949 316 6 405 11,671 58.5 6,828 6.13 419 628 209 7 405 11,977 54.1 6,480 6.10 395 593 198 8 405 13,127 58.7 7,701 6.06 467 700 233 9 405 8,485 64.3 5,458 6.66 364 545 181 10 5 18,305 61.2 11,206 6.95 779 1168 389 11 5 18,134 64.0 11,604 6.82 791 1187 396 12 5 18,649 58.5 10,902 8.14 887 1331 444 13 5 18,739 59.2 11,086 11.82 1,310 1966 656 14 5 23,186 51.1 11,846 12.74 1,509 2264 755 15 5 12,136 50.2 6,096 16.62 1,013 1520 507 16 Old River 907 60.0 544 10.00 54 82 28 17 Millux 247 60.0 148 10.00 15 22 7 18 Hill 149 60.0 90 10.00 9 13 4 Source: Caltrans,2004; Kern County,2006; Google Earth,2006;and CH2M HILL calculations. The LOS grades(A through F) are based on the criteria presented in the HCM.The criteria for freeway segments are summarized in Table 5;for urban streets(Brookhurst Street segment),refer to Table 6.The HCM urban street classification system considers both the functional category(i.e.,travel volume,mileage,and service characteristics)and design category(i.e.,speed limit,signal density,driveway/access-point density,and other design features).The functional component is separated into two categories: principal arterial and minor arterial.The design component is separated into four categories:high-speed, suburban,intermediate,and urban. Appropriate urban street class is determined on the basis of a combination of functional category and design category.Based on the characteristics of the local roadways,Old River Road,Millux Road,and Hill Road segments are considered a Class II two-lane highway(see Table 7[Exhibit 12-10 of the HCM]).The capacity of a two-lane highway is estimated to be 17,000 PCE/hour/lane,based on the HCM.Specific estimates of LOS are not available,but given the volumes on these roadways, an LOS of C or better is expected. T8072006003SC01SKIC SS315.DOC/06188M 7 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE 4 2006 No-Haul LOS per Roadway Segment PCE Segment Route Peak Hour Traffic HOV Flow/ due PCE/ PCE/ LOS No. No. I Peak Dir Hr/Dir to Trucks Hr/Dir Hr/Lane (HCM) 1 Brookhurst 2,692 0 64 2,756 919 F 2 405 12,278 1,500 158 10,936 2,734 F 3 405 12,674 1,500 174 11,349 1,891 D 4 405 10,236 1,500 293 9,029 2,257 E 5 405 10,597 1,500 316 9,413 2,353 F 6 405 11,208 1,500 209 9,917 2,479 F 7 405 10,910 1,500 198 9,608 2,402 F 8 405 12,421 0 233 12,655 2,531 F 9 405 10,119 0 181 10,301 2,575 F 10 5 10,309 0 389 10,698 2,140 E 11 5 12,421 0 396 12,816 2,563 F 12 5 11,495 0 444 11,938 2,985 F 13 5 10,916 0 656 11,572 3,857 F 14 5 11,436 0 755 12,191 4,064 F 15 5 5,369 0 507 5,876 2,938 F 16 Old River 218 0 28 245 245 >C 17 Millux 59 0 7 66 66 >C 18 Hill 36 0 4 40 40 >C TABLE 5 LOS Criteria for Basic Freeway Segments Criteria LOS A B C D E Free Flow Speed(FFS)=65 mi/hr Maximum Density(pc/mi/lane) 11 18 26 35 45 Minimum Speed(mi/hr) 65.0 65.0 64.6 59.7 52.2 Maximum V/C 0.30 0.50 0.71 0.89 1.00 Maximum Service Flow Rate(pc/hrAane) 710 1,170 1,830 2,090 2,350 Source: HCM(TRB,2000),excerpted from Exhibit 23-2. Note: LOS F is over-saturation of the freeway capacity. TB072006003SCOISKIC SS315.DOC/06188M 8 20 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE 6 Example of Maximum Service Volumes for Urban Streets by LOS Class II Lanes A B C D E 1 N/A N/A 670 850 890 2 N/A N/A 1,470 1,700 1,780 3 N/A N/A 2,280 2,550 2.670 4 N/A N/A 3,090 3,400 3,560 Source: HCM(TRB,2000),excerpted from Exhibit 10-7. NIA: Not Applicable—Urban streets operate at LOS C. LOS numbers indicate threshold volumes or worse,by definition. For example,900 vehicles on a one-lane facility is LOS F,because 900 exceeds the 890 service volume for LOS E. TABLE 7 Two-Lane Highway Classes Class Description I Highways on which motorists expect to travel at relatively high speeds,including major intercity routes, primary arterials,and daily commuter routes. II Highways on which motorists do not necessarily expect to travel at high speeds,including access routes, scenic and recreational routes,which are not primarily arterials, and routes through rugged terrain. Source:HCM(TRB,2000), Exhibit 12-10. "The LOS for Class I highways on which efficient mobility is paramount is defined in terms of both percent time- spent-following and average travel speed. On Class II highways, mobility is less critical,and LOS is defined only in terms of percent-time-spent-following." 2.6 Haul Analysis A worst-case scenario was adopted for the analysis of the proposed biosolids hauling. This worst-case assumption is that all trucks will be in the same lane,within a single peak hour, and traveling in the same direction,with a total of 15 PCEs added to the No-Haul volumes. Using this assumption,the LOS of each segment is calculated for the Haul scenario,which accounts for the additional biosolids-hauling trucks. A PCE of 1.5 is the appropriate factor considering overall roadway route grades. A refined level of study would incorporate slope conditions of individual segments.The volumes and LOS are summarized in Table 8.Even by considering the worst-case scenario,the percent increase in peak PCEs per hour per lane is less than 1 percent on all freeway segments,and less than 2 percent on the arterial segments in Orange County.There are no changes in LOS on these facilities.The percentage changes in volumes on the two-lane roadways(Old River Road,Millux Road,and Hill Road)are higher,but the LOS will remain C or better. TB072006=C01SKIC_SS315.DOCf061880004 9 2-0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE 8 2006 Haul Scenario LOS Projections per Roadway Segment PCE/ V/C V/C Hrl PCE!Hr l Ratio Ratio LOS Lane Lane No- With Percent LOS With Route No-Haul With Haul Haul Haul Increase No-Haul Haul Segment No. No. (2008) (2008) (2008) (2008 (%) (2008) (2008) 1 Brookhurst 919 934 1.033 1.049 1.6 F F 2 405 2,734 2,749 1.163 1.170 0.5 F F 3 405 1,891 1,906 0.805 0.811 0.8 D D 4 405 2,257 2,272 0.960 0.967 0.7 E E 5 405 2,353 2,368 1.001 1.008 0.6 F F 6 405 2,479 2,494 1.055 1.061 0.6 F F 7 405 2,402 2,417 1.022 1.029 0.6 F F 8 405 2,531 2,546 1.077 1.083 0.6 F F 9 405 2,575 2,590 1.096 1.102 0.6 F F 10 5 2,140 2,155 0.911 0.917 0.7 E E 11 5 2,563 2,578 1.091 1.097 0.6 F F 12 5 2,985 3,000 1.270 1.277 0.5 F F 13 5 3,857 3,872 1.641 1.648 0.4 F F 14 5 4,064 4,079 1.729 1.736 0.4 F F 15 5 2,938 2,953 1.250 1.257 0.5 F F 16 Old River 245 260 0.215 0.228 6.1 >C >C 17 Millux 66 81 0.058 0.071 22.7 >C >C 18 Hill 40 55 0.035 0.048 37.5 >C >C V/C ratio is obtained using the following capacities per lane as provided by the HCM(TRB,2000): Freeway Capacity=2,350 vehicles per hour(vph)(Exhibit 23-2). Class I Street= 1,140 vph(Exhibit 10-7). Class II Street=890 vph(Exhibit 10-7). 2.7 Cumulative Traffic Impacts The 1999 Strategic Plan includes a PER(Sanitation District,1999).The report discusses the traffic impacts of biosolids hauling over the following 20 years.Potential traffic impacts associated with biosolids hauling operations from both Plant No.1 and Plant No.2 were found to be less than significant with mitigation. Additionally,traffic impacts associated with increased biosolids and chemical truck trips on the regional transportation network, especially on freeways such as Interstate(I)-405 and I-5,were found to be less than significant with mitigation. On May 25,2005,the Sanitation District Board of Directors certified the Final Subsequent Environmental linpact Report(SEIR)for the Secondary Treatment and Plant Intproventent Project (Sanitation District,2005).The SEIR analyzes the environmental impacts of numerous improvements at Plant No.1 and Plant No.2 required to achieve secondary treatment standards.The SEIR found that the operation impacts would not substantially increase T8072006003SCOISKIC_SS315.DOC/0618=M 10 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS traffic levels over existing conditions or road capacity. The cumulative traffic impacts of the increase in biosolids truck trips from both Plant No. 1 and No.2 were found to be less than significant with mitigation because(1)the total truck volumes were low compared to existing traffic on the roads adjacent to the plants,and (2) the proposed mitigation measures would limit truck trips to off-peak hours,when possible. Cumulative traffic impacts associated with receiving biosolids at SKIC were evaluated in the Supplement to the EIR(Kern County,2004).The cumulative traffic impact evaluation section found that implementation of the project along with past, present,and reasonably anticipated future projects would not contribute to additional impacts to transportation and traffic.The document concluded that the incremental contribution of the project to a transportation and traffic impact was reduced to a level of insignificance through implementation of the legal/regulatory requirements and implementation of the Project Mitigation Measures. The proposed biosolids hauling from Sanitation District plants to SKIC is part of the implementation of the 1999 Strategic Plan and the Secondary Treatment and Plant Improvement Project.In this regard,the biosolids hauling to SKIC is only part of the ultimate biosolids hauling that was identified and evaluated in the PEIR and SEIR (Sanitation District, 1999 and 2005). The proposed biosolids hauling to SKIC would not result in a new cumulative traffic impact from that identified in the PEIR and SEIR. TB072006003SCO/SKIC_SS315,DOC1061880004 11 3.0 CEQA Analysis The transportation criteria provided in the CEQA Environmental Checklist(Appendix G, CEQA Guidelines)were used to determine the potential significance of impacts related to biosolids hauling.The criteria and responses are provided below. 1) Could the Project cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? The traffic analysis findings are that there are no significant effects on the LOS or traffic operations.Even with the worst-case scenario,where all the trucks depart the treatment plants to SKIC at the same time, the percent change in volumes on the analyzed route segments is less than 1 percent of the freeway segments and less than 2 percent on the arterial segments in Orange County.On the two-lane segments,there are higher percentages of volume changes, but the overall volumes are low. These increases will cause no measurable effects on the operations or LOS of the analyzed segments. Furthermore,the potential traffic impact associated with proposed hauling to SKIC is consistent with that identified in the PEIR,SEIR,and Supplement to the EIR for the SKIC Specific Plan. 2) Could the project exceed,either individtially or cuninlatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or higinvays? The biosolids hauling process involves truck trips from Orange County to Kern County, passing through Los Angeles County.The LOS standards established by the Congestion Management Agencies(CMAs)of the three counties are listed below and checked against the LOS for each segment. Orange County The 2003 update of Orange County's Congestion Management Plan(CMP) states that, "The majority of local governments in Orange County designated the Orange County Transportation Authority(OCTA) as the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) for the county.Since then,OCTA has been charged with the development, monitoring and biennial updating of Orange County's(CMP).The goals of Orange County's CMP are to reduce traffic congestion and provide a mechanism for coordinating land use and development decisions... Traffic Level of Service(LOS) standards are to be established for a system of highways and roadways designated by the agency.The system shall include at a minimum all state highways and principal arterials... Level of Service shall be measured by Circular 212(or by the most recent version of the Highway Capacity Manual), or by a uniform methodology adopted by the agency which is consistent with the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)... Within the defined CMP highway network, intersections and freeway segments are not allowed to deteriorate to a condition which is worse than E,or the base year LOS if worse than E,without mitigation being prescribed in an acceptable deficiency plan.In the case of base conditions reflecting a LOS worse than E, TB07200600'iSCOiSKIC_SS315.DOCi00188M 12 3.0 CECIA ANALYSIS "existing LOS" is defined as any increase in V/C ratio of up to 0.10 over the base condition. V/C ratio increases beyond 0.10 above the base condition are considered not to comply with CMP LOS objectives and shall require mitigation or a deficiency plan." Based on the calculations in this analysis,the increase in V/C with the proposed biosolids hauling is 0.01 (approximately 1 percent).The increases in V/C ratio are significantly less than 10 percent(0.10). Therefore,there are no impacts to the LOS standards for Orange County. Los Angeles County California Government Code Section 65089(b) (1) states that the Level of Service Element shall"in no case be less than the level of service E or the current level, whichever is farthest from level of service A.When the level of service on a segment or at an intersection fails to attain the established level of service standard,a deficiency plan shall be adopted pursuant to Section 65089.4." This is part of the Los Angeles County General Plan. Also, objective 2.3 of the Los Angeles County CMP "sets level of service standards that provide a reasonable balance between mobility and the cost of building and operating the transportation system... Establish level of service E or the current level,whichever is farthest from LOS A,as the LOS standard for intersections or segments on the CMP system of roadways... If the LOS was F, then a 10 percent or more degradation in the quantitative measure used to determine the LOS(such as delay, V/C,or travel speed)will comprise a deficiency,which must be addressed by a deficiency plan." Similar to Orange County, there are no predicted changes in LOS,and the increases in V/C ratio are significantly less than 10 percent(0.10).Therefore,there are no impacts to the LOS standards for Los Angeles County Kern County The circulation element is one of seven elements mandated by the State of California Government Code 65302(b) to be included in the general plan of local governments. Kern County's 5th objective of its circulation element is to maintain a minimum Level of Service of"D" for all roads throughout the County.No specific guidance is given for mainline freeway segments.Since the additional biosolids truck volumes are small and do not affect the overall LOS,no impacts to Kern County LOS standards are expected. 3) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risk? The proposed biosolids hauling would have no effect on air traffic patterns.Therefore, there are no impacts associated with this element of the CEQA checklist. 4) SubstantialIy increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or inconipatible uses (e.g.,farin equipinent)? The proposed biosolids hauling would have no effect on design.Therefore, there are no impacts associated with this element of the CEQA checklist. TBO72000 MCO/SKIC_SS315.DOCf061880004 13 3.0 CEQA ANALYSIS 5) Result in inadequate entergencly access? The proposed biosolids hauling would have no effect on emergency access.Therefore, there are no impacts associated with this element of the CEQA checklist. 6) Result in inadequate parking capacity? The proposed biosolids hauling would have no effect on parking.Therefore,there are no impacts associated with this element of the CEQA checklist. 7) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or prograaus supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bits turnouts, bicycle racks)? The proposed biosolids hauling would have no effect on policies, plans,or programs. Therefore, there are no impacts associated with this element of the CEQA checklist. TB0720D6003SCO1SKIC_SS315.DOC1061880004 14 4.0 References California Department of Transportation(Caltrans).2004. All Traffic Volumes on California State Highway System.-.vww.dot.ca.gov/liq/traffops/saferesr/trafdata/2004a1I.htm. Accessed June 2006. 2005. 2004 Average Annual Daily Tritck Traffic, California State Highway System. 2006.Traffic data for the years 2002,2003,and 2004. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/traffops/saferesr/trafdata/2004all.htm. Accessed June 2006. Google Earth.2006. http://earth.google.com. Accessed June 2006. Kern County.2004. Planning Department. Snpplement to the Environmental Impact Report for the Soutlt Kern Industrial Center Specific Plan. Adopted June 29. Kern County.2006.Roads Department. Traffic data for the years 2002,2003,and 2004. http://wjww.co.kern.ca.us/roads/. Accessed June 2006. Long,Rebecca.2000.Legislative Analyst Office,California's Nonpartisan Fiscal and Policy Advisor.HOV Lanes in California:Are They Achieving Their Goals?January. ht!p:/./­`www.lao.ca.gov/­­2000/­010700-hov/­010700 hov lanes.html Orange County Sanitation District. 1999. 1999 Strategic Platt Program Environmental Impact Report(PEIR). . 2005. Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Secondary Treatment and Plant Improvetttent Project.May 25. Transportation Research Board (TRB),of the National Academy of Sciences.2000. High7vay Capacity Manual 2000. TB072006003SC01SKIC_SS315.DOC/06188M 15 OCSD BIOSOLIDS CONTRACTS ADDENDUM APPENDIX C Biosolids Hauling Traffic Impacts Analysis, EnerTech Renewable Energy Facility, July 2006 528774.1 20 Report Biosolids Hauling Traffic Impact Analysis EnerTech Renewable Energy Facility Prepared for Orange County sanitation District July 2006 Prepared by f i s,,,t COO 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 T8072006003SCOIENERTECH_SS317.DOC1061910001 i Contents Section Page Acronyms ...........................................................................................................................................ii 1.0 Background...............................................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction and Purpose.............................................................................................1 1.2 Proposed Biosolids Hauling..........................................................................................1 2.0 Traffic Analysis........................................................................................................................4 2.1 Approach.........................................................................................................................4 2.2 Route Selection Process..................................................................................................4 2.3 Analysis Assumptions...................................................................................................6 2.4 Existing Conditions........................................................................................................6 2.5 No-Haul Analysis...........................................................................................................8 2.6 Haul Analysis................................................................................................................10 2.7 Cumulative Traffic Impacts........................................................................................10 3.0 CEQA Analysis......................................................................................................................12 4.0 References...............................................................................................................................15 Tables 1 Roadway Segments from Plant No.1 to EnerTech Renewable Energy Facility............5 2 Roadway Segments from Plant No.2 to EnerTech Renewable Energy Facility............5 3 Traffic Characteristics of the Affected Roadway Segments..............................................7 4 2008 Truck Volumes and Passenger Car Equivalents.......................................................8 5 2008 No-Haul Scenario LOS Projections per Arterial and Freeway Segments..............9 6 LOS Criteria for Basic Freeway Segments...........................................................................9 7 Example Service Volumes by Urban Streets by LOS.......................................................10 8 2008 Haul Scenario LOS Projections per Roadway Segment.........................................11 Figures 1 Truck Route from Plant No.1 to the EnerTech Renewable Energy Facility..................3 2 Truck Route from Plant No.2 to the EnerTech Renewable Energy Facility..................3 TB07P006003SCONNERTECH-SS317.DOCl061010001 Acronyms ADT average daily traffic Caltrans California Department of Transportation CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CMA Congestion Management Agency CMP Congestion Management Plan D directional split factor EIR Environmental Impact Report GP general purpose HCM Highway Capacity Manual 2000 HOV high-occupancy vehicle I Interstate K peak hour flow factor LOS level of service OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority PCE passenger car equivalent PEIR 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report PHV peak hour volume Plant No. 1 Reclamation Plant No. 1 Plant No.2 Treatment Plant No.2 Sanitation District Orange County Sanitation District SEIR Subsequent Environmental Impact Report SR State Route TRB Transportation Research Board V/C volume-to-capacity ratio vph vehicles per hour TB072006903SCOIENERTECH SS317.DOCI061910001 II 1 .0 Background 1.1 Introduction and Purpose The Orange County Sanitation District(Sanitation District)operates and maintains two wastewater treatment plants located in Orange County,California.Reclamation Plant No. 1 (Plant No. 1) is located on Ellis Avenue, in Fountain Valley.Treatment Plant No.2(Plant No. 2) is located on Brookhurst Street,in Huntington Beach. Biosolids hauling from Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 is anticipated to increase the net truck trips compared to the 2005 conditions. The anticipated increase in truck trips is described in the Sanitation District's 1999 Strategic Plan Progrmn Environmental Impact Report(PEIR)(Sanitation District,1999), which analyzed the environmental impacts of expanding treatment facilities over the next 20 years. Since the completion of the PEIR,the Sanitation District has expanded its biosolids management options to include beneficial reuse,specifically,biosolids processing into E-fuel at the EnerTech Renewable Energy Facility in San Bernardino County,California (EnerTech Facility). This report summarizes the forecasted traffic impacts associated with biosolids-hauling trucks traveling from Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 to the EnerTech Facility. The environmental impacts associated with receiving biosolids at the EnerTech Facility were evaluated in the Environmental Impact Report(EIR)for the Construction and Operation of a Regional Biosolids Processing Facilihj(City of Rialto,2004). The purpose of this traffic analysis is to determine whether biosolids truck hauling operations will affect the level of service(LOS)on the routes between Sanitation District plants and the EnerTech Facility. The analysis includes an assessment of the LOS on regional and local roadways with and without the addition of the biosolids-hauling trucks. LOS is defined by a volume-to-capacity ratio(V/C)ranging from A(V/C ratio 0.0 to 0.6) to F(V/C ratio over 1.0).Levels A through C are generally considered good operating conditions with only minor delays;LOS D is considered a fair operating condition with drivers occasionally having to wait through more than one signal at the intersection;LOS E includes longer delays with more common occurrences of drivers waiting through more than one signal;and LOS F is considered to have conditions of restricted flow. An assessment of the significance of potential traffic impacts was completed using the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)Environmental Checklist(Appendix G, CEQA Guidelines) for Traffic and Transportation.This report documents the methodology used and the LOS assessment and findings of this traffic impact analysis. 1.2 Proposed Biosolids Hauling The proposed hauling of a combined total of eight truck loads per day of biosolids from Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 in Orange County to the EnerTech Facility in San Bernardino County is evaluated herein. The additional truck trips that accommodate increasing volumes of biosolids were considered in the PEIR,but the route from the Sanitation District TB072006003SCOIENERTECH_SS317.DOG061910001 1 1.0 BACKGROUND plants to the EnerTech Facility was not analyzed. For the purpose of this specific traffic analysis,truck trips associated with hauling from the Sanitation District plants to the EnerTech Facility are anticipated to begin in 2008. Biosolids-hauling trucks would depart from Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 and travel to the EnerTech Facility located on Santa Ana Avenue in Rialto,which is in San Bernardino County.Trucks would travel through Orange, Riverside,and San Bernardino Counties(see Figures 1 and 2). TB0720060=CO/ENERTECH_Ml7.DOC106191D001 2 1.0 BACKGROUND FIGURE 1 Truck Route from Plant No.1 to the EnerTech Renewable Energy Facility O r Kais �._. / — _.L`�Q�S G E L-i`1S` . '1 i j j ' A R Md1Ao 'S y `r�aY7�BfM@ r 'w L �aM LbMe o gy�RabB1Wf r Chino AI od e....• ;'' rslde `..1 Iitblr�J NEJ > Mire L br `x.�otArlr` �C6Htk�6rHtsigMsr}da Smrarroa `^�., b&_...;-- fpt� �,�..-�•,'t•+^'`'-.--, {i "j 1 c R _ a t45 C A L �k"0 R N ullls-- It -. 30 .o _;• Chino H Is state perk Nalco .._. � 1k . . 4 j. .*Cer� Myaldpal 91 � .. Moleno V-r- .'�,—"? ,f'• ^�"�a•+-Ya>. ba Linda _ '� �., 'Home Gardena 4FD. na R I V R 5 I D'� I � i f"•s•'.^y"�� a. 91 Y ��mu Pack•._�_r.tM1 +I Ala e ,> fat $fig U qIRB , '� IloJgtY.n Peak. N ��- r66� -�/t ��Sonoago Peak L 74: HUrltingt 99 -' ' Ibe >` s �C T-b P_ak Qla9VE8eY�J Beashlj tit I ° _x `� 5� mr-t r' ^° rake Like WOW FIGURE 2 Truck Route from Plant No.2 to the EnerTech Renewable Energy Facility -tip, and +bu _r1 Hit I' 11 e0 "�• N� a 1: �i' .Rao.w ..._„� Kai ... yV';!••r _..1 E JYfpM t _ r a ;rG blldBaI, ,�' ... it-' ,F....k}i 7j5' f � �N. t OIl�II a1l1�B_ NpN LOW .. 71 (88 r jt<•` ,� -t'.......... �• ='r� i+s. 5 � � i�' IU113 ': ` ' �F. Ilde.,,la5sl'ng. �I fib a * •'� ,.TL:::.:.T .0 A L IR t I A. �. Ghclo ItQIS Slate parK. - j h .orbaun= j;.. 7 oreo 1�, \ 5 ._ More � h alley .. � _ - � OtQrderts� --. I n. 91 �k-�•*T-�-,.y ,� U.._� 9f ,ndp .' VVbodcre3l . AM M6- Mrjoft na t� +'SirSaFeat �.EIC@rrlto! ti5. m ) �PhFk ` 4 j ��( 67 .. R ��y E R I D E �5 Ntalvo r ;y ' ►d t Ong x 1a1 Rt " 3e SZei) 1� :.Beach �: 1 N p•, o kludjerka Peak .^ (,wag �07 ro l 1 � , i,:D ' S-tago P"k V�,Dk A'Jn ♦Y Y' FrPbuco Peak I - 2 j 5 _ t site ' HUntln `O� �L241' ;X �L . 9� l3 . Pbcllic Oeea»arh ,,1 ? Lake y' �,1 'ti J 'F�Ldcetend v5neye i' w con .a...-- .-. .._.. NBW}>II7t BB8Cf1a �•ri%� � :,_J� � Mal da �k;'Elwnre Peak TB072006003SCO/ENERTECH_SS317.DOC/06191D001 3 2.0 Traffic Analysis 2.1 Approach The traffic analysis includes an assessment of route segments connecting the Sanitation District plants in Orange County with the EnerTech Facility in San Bernardino County.The traffic analysis approach is as follows: • The affected roadways include both arterial and freeway facilities. • Freeway impacts are evaluated for segments of freeway that are generally not more than 10 miles in length. • Traffic volumes for each freeway segment are analyzed as peak hour volume(PHV) values for the highest-volume portion of each segment. • The analysis of potential traffic impacts is based on the methodology in the Highway Capacihj Maintal 2000(HCM)(Transportation Research Board [TRB],2000). Volumes and capacities are determined for the highest-volume portions of each freeway segment,and a corresponding LOS assessment is made. Adjustments for truck factors(passenger car equivalents [PCEs])are included in the V/C calculations.Similar calculations are completed for the arterials. • A single horizon year(2008) is analyzed,based on expectations for the start of service at the EnerTech Facility,as determined by Sanitation District.Traffic volumes for the horizon year are determined by applying a simple growth rate. • Traffic counts are obtained through the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and local jurisdictions. • Analysis includes a base-case without the proposed biosolids hauling(No-Haul scenario)and operations with the hauling(Haul scenario). The traffic analysis is comprised of five major steps: route selection process,analysis assumptions,existing conditions, No-Haul analysis,and Haul analysis.These steps are described in the following sections. 2.2 Route Selection Process Trucks will travel from Plant No.1 and Plant No.2 to the EnerTech Facility.Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the likely routes for trucks hauling biosolids from Plant No.1 and Plant No.2. Tables 1 and 2 summarize the roadway segments for each trip.The segments are numbered sequentially,with common segments between the two routes given the same number.For the few segments of the route that differ for the two plants,a letter preceding the segment number was used to differentiate the origin plant. TB072006003SCO/ENERTECH_SS317.DOC1061910001 4 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE 1 Roadway Segments from Plant No. 1 to EnerTech Renewable Energy Facility Node Segment Route Length Total Distance No. No. From To Direction (miles) (miles) Al 405 Plant No. 1 SR-55 South 4 4 1 55 1-405 1-5 North 4.4 8.4 2 55 1-5 SR-22 North 2.6 11 3 55 SR-22 SR-91 North 4.8 15.8 4 91 SR-55 SR-241 East 7.1 22.9 5 91 SR-241 SR-71 East 4.75 27.65 6 91 SR-71 1-15 East 5.35 33 7 15 SR-91 SR-60 North 10 43 8 15 SR-60 1-10 North 3.2 46.2 9 10 1-15 S. Riverside Ave. East 9.9 56.1 10 S. Riverside 1-10 Santa Ana South 0.9 57 11 Santa Ana S. Riverside Ave. EnerTech East 0.5 57.5 TABLE 2 Roadway Segments from Plant No.2 to EnerTech Renewable Energy Facility Segment Route Node Length Total Distance No. No. From To Direction (miles) (miles) B1 Brookhurst Plant No.2 Victoria St. North 0.9 0.9 B2 Victoria St. Brookhurst St. SR-55 East 2.6 3.5 B3 55 Victoria St. SR-73 North 1.9 5.4 B4 55 SR-73 1-405 North 1.3 6.7 1 55 1-405 1-5 North 4.4 11.1 2 55 1-5 SR-22 North 2.6 13.7 3 55 SR-22 SR-91 North 4.8 18.5 4 91 SR-55 SR-241 East 7.1 25.6 5 91 SR-241 SR-71 East 4.75 30.35 6 91 SR-71 1-15 East 5.35 35.7 7 15 SR-91 SR-60 North 10 45.7 8 15 SR-60 1-10 North 3.2 48.9 9 10 1-15 S. Riverside Ave. East 9.9 58.8 10 S. Riverside 1-10 Santa Ana South 0.9 59.7 11 Santa Ana S. Riverside Ave. EnerTech East 0.5 60.2 TB072000003SCOIENERTECH SS317.DOC1061910001 5 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 2.3 Analysis Assumptions The following assumptions are used in the traffic analysis. The number of biosolids-hauling trucks from Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 to the EnerTech Facility is assumed to be a combined total of eight trucks per day, based on estimates provided by Sanitation District. As a conservative assumption,all trucks are assumed to be traveling during the peak hour, in the same lane of the peak direction. The exact timing and combination of trucks departing each facility could vary.For this reason,the worst-case scenario of truck departure combinations is analyzed,and assumes that all eight trucks per day will depart Plant No.1 or Plant No.2 during the same peak hour. This assumption ensures that the maximum possible truck traffic impacts are assessed for each segment of the route. Additionally,biosolids-hauling trucks are assumed to use general purpose(GP) lanes throughout their entire trip to the EnerTech Facility and back. Traffic flow on high-occupancy vehicle(HOV) lanes is set at capacity(1,500 vehicles per hour per lane)l as a conservative assumption. Additionally, traffic volumes on the State Route(SR)-91 toll lanes(700 vehicles per hour per lane)are based on published statistics on the 91-Express Lanes website(Orange County Transportation Authority [OCTA],2006a). The directional split factor(D)2 on the urban streets is assumed to be 60 percent and applies to Brookhurst and Victoria Streets. A peak hour flow factor(K)3 of 9 percent is also used for Brookhurst and Victoria Streets.Truck volumes on local streets are assumed to be 5 percent of the average daily traffic(ADT), based on typical values in the HCM. 2.4 Existing Conditions Traffic data were obtained from Caltrans(2004) and OCTA(2006b). Traffic data were available for the year 2004,so that year is used as the base year for analysis. Table 3 provides a summary of the characteristics of the analyzed segments along the route from the Sanitation District plants to the EnerTech Facility. Since the routes from Plant No. 1 and PIant No.2 to the EnerTech Facility overlap,Table 3 includes the segments listed in both Tables 1 and 2.Table 3 identifies the number of GP lanes,HOV lanes,and toll lanes along each segment.For traffic,the data include the annual ADT and truck volumes,peak hour traffic volumes,directional split of traffic in each direction (D),and the percentage of traffic in the peak hour(K). The HCM uses the concept of PCEs to account for the influence of trucks in traffic.For this analysis,truck volumes were converted into PCEs using the HCM procedures.The analysis is summarized in Table 4.First,the directional split factor(D)was used to convert truck flow in both directions to truck volumes in the peak direction.Then,using the K factor, truck volumes in the peak direction are converted into flow per peak hour.Finally,using 1 Report by the Legislative Analyst Office,January 2000,titled,HOV Lanes in Cal fomia:Are They Achieving Their Goals? (Long,2000). 2 The proportion of vehicles traveling in the peak direction during the peak hour:Usually,this factor is used to convert average daily traffic(ADT)volumes for both directions to volumes in the peak direction,which is critical to the analysis. 3 The proportion of vehicles traveling during the peak hour:Using this factor,the peak hour volume in the peak direction is computed based on the ADT volume for that direction.The peak hour volume is used to obtain the LOS,according to HCM 2000 guidelines. TB072006003SC0lENERTECH_SS317.DOC1061910001 6 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS the HCM conversion factor for the overall truck population (1.5),peak hourly volumes of trucks were converted into PCEs per peak hour and peak direction.The difference between the truck volumes and the equivalent passenger cars,which is shown in the last column of Table 4, is the volume that is added to the regular traffic volumes to account for trucks. TABLE 3 Traffic Characteristics of the Affected Roadway Segments GP HOV Toll Peak Hour Origin Segment Route Lanes/ Lanes Lanes/ Traffic Trucks/ D K Plant No. No. No. Dir Mir Dir (Veh/hr) Day (°/,) M 1 Al 405 5 1 0 26,075 9,750 53.7 6.98 2 61 Brookhurst 3 0 0 1,980 1,100 60 9 2 B2 Victoria 2 0 0 2,970 1,650 60 9 2 B3 55 3 0 0 7,733 1,944 60.3 6.98 2 B4 55 4 0 0 15,900 5,424 62.6 6.87 1,2 1 55 4 1 0 19,200 4,620 60.6 7.02 1,2 2 55 4 1 0 13,967 17,017 72.7 7.14 1,2 3 55 4 1 0 15,100 15,163 84.7 7.42 1,2 4 91 5 0 2 19,175 13,995 54.2 6.48 1,2 5 91 5 0 2 18,400 15,164 57.6 6.46 1,2 6 91 5 0 2 18,117 16,731 56.5 7.02 1,2 7 15 3 1 0 11,360 17,534 53.4 7.52 1,2 8 15 3 1 0 16,100 17,958 55.6 7.01 1,2 9 10 4 1 0 14,217 26,085 55.9 6.49 1,2 10 S. Riverside 2 0 0 1,856 2,022 51.1 9 1,2 11 Santa Ana 1 0 0 200 1,077 51.6 9 ' The Origin Plant No. indicates the plant from which the trucks originated. Source:Caltrans,2004; OCTA,2006b;and CH2M HILL calculations. TB072ODMSCOIENERTECH SS3i7.DOCID61910001 7 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE 4 2008 Truck Volumes and Passenger Car Equivalents Segment Route Trucks/ D Trucks/ K Trucks/ PCE/ Difference in No. No. Day (%) Day I Dir (%) Peak Hour Lane/Hr PCE/Lane/Hr Al 405 10,133 53.7 5,442 6.98 380 570 190 B1 Brookhurst 1,143 60.0 686 9.00 62 93 31 B2 Victoria 1,715 60.0 1,029 9.00 93 139 46 B3 55 2,020 60.3 1,217 6.98 85 127 42 64 55 5,637 62.6 3,528 6.87 242 364 122 1 55 4,802 60.6 2,909 7.02 204 306 102 2 55 17,686 72.7 12,858 7.14 918 1,377 459 3 55 15,759 84.7 13,354 7.42 991 1,486 495 4 91 14,545 54.2 7,885 6.48 511 766 255 5 91 15,760 57.6 9,084 6.46 587 880 293 6 91 17,389 56.5 9,816 7.02 689 1,034 345 7 15 18,224 53.4 9,728 7.52 732 1,097 365 8 15 18,664 55.6 10,370 7.01 727 1,090 363 9 10 27,111 55.9 15,166 6.49 984 1,476 492 10 S. Riverside 2,062 51A 1,054 9 95 142 71 11 Santa Ana 1,099 51.6 567 9 51 76 76 2.5 No-Haul Analysis The No-Haul analysis estimates the traffic volumes without the proposed biosolids hauling. The 2004 traffic volumes described in Section 2.4 are converted to 2008 volumes by applying an average annual growth rate of 1 percent.Table 5 is a summary of the LOS calculation for the 2008 No-Haul scenario.The volume in the HOV/toll lanes and the PCE columns, factoring in the truck volumes,are used to determine the PCE volumes in the peak direction in the GP lanes.The peak PCEs per hour per lane are computed and used to determine the LOS. The LOS grades(A through F)are based on the criteria presented in the HCM(refer to summaries in Table 6 [freeway] and Table 7 [arterial]).The HCM urban street classification system considers both the functional category(i.e., travel volume,mileage,and service characteristics)and design category(i.e.,speed limit,signal density, driveway/access-point density,and other design features).The functional component is separated into two categories: principal arterial and minor arterial.The design component is separated into four categories:high-speed,suburban,intermediate,and urban. Appropriate urban street class is determined on the basis of a combination of functional category and design category.Based on the characteristics of the local roadways,and Exhibits 10-3 through 10-6 of the HCM,the two urban street segments are assumed to be Class H. TB072006003SCOIENERTECH_SS317.DOC/061910001 8 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE 5 2008 No-Haul Scenario LOS Projections per Arterial and Freeway Segments Peak Hour HOV-Toll PCE Segment Route Traffic/Peak Flow/Hr/ due to PCEI Hr PCE/Hr/ LOS No. No. Dir Dir Trucks /Dir Lane (HCM) Al 405 14,553 1,500 190 13,243 2649 F B1 Brookhurst 1,235 0 31 1,266 422 C B2 Victoria 1,852 0 46 1,898 949 F B3 55 4,843 0 42 4,885 1,628 C B4 55 10,342 0 122 10,463 2,616 F 1 55 12,089 1,500 102 10,691 2,673 F 2 55 10,553 1,500 459 9,512 2,378 F 3 55 13,299 1,500 495 12,294 3,074 F 4 91 10,804 1,400 255 9,659 1,932 F" 5 91 11,023 1,400 293 9,916 1,983 F" 6 91 10,629 1,400 345 9,574 1,915 F• 7 15 6,302 1,500 365 5,168 1,723 D 8 15 9,297 1,500 363 8,160 2,720 F 9 10 8,266 1,500 492 7,257 1,814 D 10 Riverside 966 0 71 1,037 518 C 11 Santa Ana 105 0 76 181 181 C *LOS D is based on calculated volumes,but observed traffic volumes are lower than demand due to the extent of congestion in the SR-91 corridor. Therefore,the value was adjusted to LOS F. TABLE 6 LOS Criteria for Basic Freeway Segments LOS Criteria A B C D E Free Flow Speed(FFS)=70 mi/hr Maximum Density(pc/mi/lane) 11 18 26 35 45 Minimum Speed(mi/hr) 70 70 68.2 61.5 53.3 Maximum V/C 0.32 0.53 0.74 0.90 1.00 Maximum Service Flow Rate(pc/hr/lane) 770 1,260 1,770 2,150 2,400 Free Flow Speed(FFS)=65 mi/hr Maximum Density(pc/mi/lane) 11 18 26 35 45 Minimum Speed(mi/hr) 65.0 65.0 64.6 59.7 52.2 Maximum V/C 0.30 0.50 0.71 0.89 1.00 Maximum Service Flow Rate(pc/hr/lane) 710 1,170 1,830 2,090 2,350 Source: HCM(TRB,2000), Exhibit 23-2. Note: LOS F is over-saturation of the freeway capacity. TB072006003SCOIENERTECH_SS317.DOC1061910001 9 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE 7 Example Service Volumes by Urban Streets by LOS Class II Lanes A B C D E 1 N/A N/A 670 850 890 2 N/A N/A 1,470 1,700 1,780 3 N/A N/A 2,280 2,550 2,670 4 N/A N/A 3,090 3,400 3,560 Source: HCM JRB,2000), Exhibit 10-7. N/A: Not Applicable—Urban streets operate at LOS C. LOS numbers indicate threshold volumes or worse, by definition. For example,900 vehicles on a one-lane facility is LOS F,because 900 exceeds the 890 service volume limit for LOS E. 2.6 Haul Analysis A worst-case scenario was adopted for the analysis of the proposed biosolids hauling. This worst-case assumption is that all trucks will be in the same lane,within the peak hour,and traveling in the same direction,with a total of 12 PCEs added to the No-Haul volumes. Using this assumption, the LOS of each segment is calculated for the Haul scenario,which accounts for the additional biosolids-hauling trucks. A PCE of 1.5 is the appropriate factor considering overall roadway route grades. A refined level of study would incorporate slope conditions of individual segments. The volumes and LOS are summarized in Table 8.Even by considering the worst-case scenario, the percent increase in peak PCEs per hour per lane is less than 0.6 percent on all freeway segments and less than 3 percent on the arterial segments. As shown in Table 8,there are no changes in LOS. 2.7 Cumulative Traffic Impacts The PERZ(Sanitation District,1999)analyzed the environmental impacts of biosolids hauling over the next 20 years.Potential traffic impacts associated with biosolids hauling operations from both Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 were found to be less than significant with mitigation. Additionally,traffic impacts associated with increased biosolids and chemical truck trips on the regional transportation network,especially on freeways such as Interstate(1)405 and I-5,were found to be less than significant with mitigation. On May 25,2005,the Sanitation District Board of Directors certified the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR)for the Secondary Treatment and Plant hnprovement Project. The SEIR analyzed the environmental impacts of numerous improvements at Plant No.1 and Plant No.2 required to achieve secondary treatment standards.The SEIR found that the operations impacts would not substantially increase traffic levels over existing conditions or road capacity.The cumulative traffic impacts of the increased biosolids truck trips from and to both Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 were found to be less than significant with mitigation because(1) the total truck volumes were low compared to the existing traffic on the roads adjacent to the plants,and (2) the proposed mitigation measures would limit truck trips to off-peak hours,when possible. TH072006003SCOIENERTECH_SS317.DOG061910001 10 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TABLE 6 2008 Haul Scenario LOS Projections per Roadway Segment PCE/ PCE/Hr I LOS Hr/Lane Lane V/C Ratio V/C Ratio Percent LOS With Segment Route No-Haul With Haul No-Haul With Haul Increase No-Haul Haul No. No. (2008) (2008) (2008) (2008) (°/a) (2008) (2008) Al 405 2,649 2,661 1.127 1.132 0.4 F F 131 Brookhurst 422 434 0.474 0.488 2.8 C C B2 Victoria 949 961 1.066 1.080 1.3 F F B3 55 1,628 1,640 0.693 0.698 0.7 C C B4 55 2,616 2,628 1.113 1.118 0.5 F F 1 55 2,673 2,685 1.137 1.143 0.5 F F 2 55 2,378 2,390 1.012 1.017 0.5 F F 3 55 3,074 3,086 1.308 1.313 0.4 F F 4 91 1,932 1,944 0.822 0.827 0.6 F F 5 91 1,983 1,995 0.844 0.849 0.6 F F 6 91 1,915 1,927 0.815 0.820 0.6 F F 7 15 1,723 1,735 0.733 0.738 0.7 D D 8 15 2,720 2,732 1.157 1.163 0.4 F F 9 10 1,814 1,826 0.772 0.777 0.7 D D 10 Riverside 518 530 0.582 0.596 2.3 C C 11 Santa Ana 181 193 0.203 0.217 6.6 C C V/C ratio is obtained using the following capacities per lane as provided by the HCM(TRB,2000): Freeway Capacity=2,350 vehicles per hour(vph)(Exhibit 23-2). Class II Street=890 vph (Exhibit 10-7). Cumulative traffic impacts associated with receiving biosolids at the EnerTech Facility were evaluated in the EIR for the biosolids processing facility(City of Rialto,2004).The cumulative traffic impact evaluation section found that without project traffic,there would be a reduction in LOS due to anticipated growth in the area;the addition of project traffic would not significantly contribute to the deterioration of the LOS.The document concluded that the addition of project traffic would result in a less than significant cumulative impact. The proposed biosolids hauling from Sanitation District plants to the EnerTech Facility is part of the implementation of the 1999 Strategic Plan and the Secondary Treatment and Plant Improvement Project.In this regard, the biosolids hauling to the EnerTech Facility is only part of the ultimate biosolids hauling that was identified and evaluated in the PEIR and SEIR(Sanitation District,1999 and 2005).The proposed biosolids hauling to EnerTech would not result in a new cumulative traffic impact from that identified in the PEIR and SEIR. TB072006003,SCO/ENERTECH_SS317.DOC/061910001 11 3.0 CEQA Analysis The transportation criteria provided in the CEQA Environmental Checklist(Appendix G, CEQA Guidelines)were used to determine the potential significance of impacts related to biosolids hauling.The criteria and responses are provided below. 1) Could the Project cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? The traffic analysis findings are that there are no significant effects on the LOS or traffic operations.Even with the worst-case scenario,where all the trucks depart the treatment plants to the energy facility at the same time, the percent change in volumes on the analyzed route segments is less than 1 percent of the freeway segments and less than 3 percent on the arterial segments.This increase would cause no measurable effects on the operations or the LOS of the analyzed segments.Furthermore,the potential traffic impact associated with proposed hauling to the EnerTech Facility is consistent with that identified in the PEIR,SEIR,and the City of Rialto EIR for the Construction and Operation of a Regional Biosolids Processing Facility. 2) Could the project exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? The biosolids hauling process involves truck trips from Orange County to San Bernardino County, passing through Riverside County.The LOS standards established by the Congestion Management Agencies(CMAs)of the three counties are described below and were checked against the LOS for each roadway segment. Orange County The 2003 update of Orange County's Congestion Management PIan (CMP) states that "The majority of local governments in Orange County designated the Orange County Transportation Authority(OCTA)as the Congestion Management Agency(CMA)for the county.Since then,OCTA has been charged with the development,monitoring and biennial updating of Orange County's CMP.The goals of Orange County's CMP are to reduce traffic congestion and provide a mechanism for coordinating land use and development decisions...Traffic Level of Service(LOS) standards are to be established for a system of highways and roadways designated by the agency.The system shall include at a minimum all state highways and principal arterials... Level of Service shall be measured by Circular 212,(or by the most recent version of the Highway Capacity Manual),or by a uniform methodology adopted by the agency which is consistent with the Highway Capacity Manual(HCM)... Within the defined CMP highway network,intersections and freeway segments are not allowed to deteriorate to a condition which is worse than LOS E,or the base year LOS if worse than E,without mitigation being prescribed in an acceptable deficiency plan.In the case of base conditions reflecting a LOS worse than E,'existing LOS' is defined as any increase in V/C ratio of up to 0.10 over the base than condition. V/C ratio increases TB072006003SC01EWERTECH_SS317.DOCl061910001 12 3.0 CEOA ANALYSIS beyond 0.10 above the base condition are considered not to comply with CMP LOS objectives and shall require mitigation or a deficiency plan." Based on the calculations in this analysis,the increase in V/C with the proposed biosolids hauling is 0.005 (approximately 1/2 percent).While LOS F conditions are predicted on I-405 and SR-55,the increases in V/C ratio are significantly less than 10 percent(0.10).Therefore, there are no impacts to the LOS standards for Orange County. San Bernardino County California Government Code Section 65089(b) (1) states that the Level of Service Element shall"in no case be less than the level of service E or the current level, whichever is farthest from level of service A.When the level of service on a segment or at an intersection fails to attain the established level of service standard,a deficiency plan shall be adopted pursuant to Section 65089.4."This is part of the San Bernardino County General PIan.Also,Objective 2.3 of the San Bernardino County CMP"sets level of service standards that provide a reasonable balance between mobility and the cost of building and operating the transportation system... Establish level of service E or the current level,whichever is farthest from LOS A, as the LOS standard for intersections or segments on the CMP system of roadways... If the LOS was F,then a 10 percent or more degradation in the quantitative measure used to determine the LOS(such as delay, V/C,or travel speed)will comprise a deficiency,which must be addressed by a deficiency plan." Similar to Orange County,there are no predicted changes in LOS,and the increases in V/C ratio are significantly less than 10 percent(0.10). Therefore,there are no impacts to the LOS standards for San Bernardino County. Riverside County Policy C2.1 of the Riverside County General Plan,Circulation Element, states that the county is to maintain the following countywide target LOS:LOS C along the entire County-maintained roads and conventional state highways. As an exception,LOS D may be allowed in community-development areas,only at intersections of any combination of secondary highways,major highways,arterials,urban arterials, expressways,conventional state highways,or freeway ramp intersections.LOS E may be allowed in designated community centers to the extent that it would support transit-oriented development and walkable communities.No specific guidance is given for mainline freeway segments.Since the additional biosolids truck volumes are small and do not affect the overall LOS conditions,no impacts to Riverside County LOS standards are expected. 3) Result in a cluinge in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risk? The proposed biosolids hauling would have no effect on air traffic patterns.Therefore, there are no impacts associated with this element of the CEQA checklist. TB072006003SCOIENERTECH SS317.DOC1061910001 13 3.0 CEQA ANALYSIS 4) Substantially increase luzzards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or inconipatible uses (e.g.,farm equipnnennt)? The proposed biosolids hauling would have no effect on design.Therefore,there are no impacts associated with this element of the CEQA checklist. 5) Result in inadequate ennergency access? The proposed biosolids hauling would have no effect on emergency access.Therefore, there are no impacts associated with this element of the CEQA checklist. 6) Result in inadequate parking capacihj? The proposed biosolids hauling would have no effect on parking.Therefore,there are no impacts associated with this element of the CEQA checklist. 7) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or prograns supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? The proposed biosolids hauling would have no effect on adopted policies, plans,or programs.Therefore,there are no impacts associated with this element of the CEQA checklist. TB072006003SCOIENERTECH_SS317.DOC1061910001 14 i 4.0 References California Department of Transportation(Caltrans).2004. All Traffic Volumes on California State Highway System.www.dot.ca.gov/liq/traffops/saferesr/trafdata/2004all.htm. Accessed June 2006. 2005. 2004 Average Annital Daily Truck Traffic, California State Highway System. 2006.Traffic data for the years 2002,2003,and 2004. h=://www.dot.ca. ova/hq/traffoRs/saferesr/trafdata/2004all.htm. Accessed June 2006. Long,Rebecca.2000.Legislative Analyst Office,California's Nonpartisan Fiscal and Policy Advisor.HOV Lanes in California:Are They Achieving Their Goals?January. http://www.lao.ca.gov/2000/010700_hov/010700_hov_ lanes.htnil Orange County Sanitation District.1999. 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report(PEIR). .2005. Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Secondary Treatment and Plant Improvenient Project.May 25. Orange County Transportation Authority(OCTA).2006a.Orange County Transportation Authority Website. http://www.91expresslanes.com. Accessed June 2006. .2006b.Orange County Transportation Authority Website. http://www.octa.net/freeways and streets/streets and roads/master plan of arterial highways. Accessed June 2006. Rialto,City of.2004. Environnental Impact Report for the Construction and Operation of a Regional Biosolids Processing Facility. August. Transportation Research Board (TRB),of the National Academy of Sciences.2000.Highway Capacity Manual 2000. TB0720060=O/ENERTECH_M317.DOC1061910001 15 RESPONSE TO KERN COUNTY'S 12/20/06 COMMENTS ON THE BIOSOLIDS ADDENDUM 1. Comment: OCSD provided inadequate notice of the Addendum to Kern County Response: The Addendum was prepared pursuant CEQA Guidelines Section 15168 (c) and 15164. The Board must consider the addendum along with the Final EIR before making a decision on biosolids contracts. Under Section 15164 (c), an addendum need not be circulated for public review and comment but may be included in or attached to the final EIR. Therefore, contrary to Kern County's assertion, OCSD was not required to circulate the document for public or agency review and comment. This requirement reflects the fact that OCSD has already conducted environmental review of its comprehensive biosolids management program in the PEIR, which contemplated a doubling of biosolids shipments, including an increase in shipments to Kern County and specifically Tule Ranch. Kern County and other public agencies had an opportunity to comment on the PEIR and its evaluation of its long range biosolids management plan at that time. Because the increase in biosolids shipments contemplated in the various contracts that are before the Board are within the increase contemplated in the PEIR, these contracts would not result in any new environmental effects of increase the severity of the significance of any previously identified environmental effects. 2. Comment: The Addendum's attempt to establish the "baseline"condition for biosolids hauling to Tule Ranch establishes that this information is not in the PEIR and that the PEIR did not examine the environmental effects of hauling biosolids from its treatment plant to Tule Ranch. Therefore, OCSD must prepare an Initial Study leading to either a Negative Declaration of EIR. Environmental effects that require further analysis include traffic, air quality, noise, and human hazards impacts, all of which were not addressed in the PEIR Response: As the Addendum explains, the PEIR analyzed a doubling of haul truck trips as part of its long term biosolids management program. At the time OCSD initiated preparation of the PEIR, OCSD was already hauling biosolids to various locations within Kern County, including Tule Ranch. The PEIR explained that "[i]n 1997, 100 percent of the District's biosolids were used for agricultural land application at sites in Kern County, Kings County, Riverside County and San Diego County. (1999 PEIR, p. 3-66). In fact, Figure 3-16, Biosolids Land Application Sites and Disposal Sites, of the PEIR depicts the location, contractors used, and number of miles of associated with hauling biosolids to land application sites in Kern County and Kings County, including Tule Ranch, Biogro and Pimagro, and one land application site in Kings County, Tule Ranch. Figure 3-16 notes that the land application sites in Kern County and Kings County are approximately 175 miles and 200 miles, respectively, from the treatment plants. The PEIR also established "baseline" condition for purposes of assessing the environmental effects of OCSD's long range biosolids management plan. The 527460.1 "baseline" represented the number of annual biosolids haul truck trips that OCSD was generating in 1997, when environmental review of the 1999 Strategic Plan commenced. As noted in the PEIR and restated in the addendum, OCSD was generating approximately 7,200 haul truck trips per year or 27 haul truck trips per day prior to the Board's approval of the Strategic Plan and certification of the PEIR. As noted in the Addendum, a portion of these trucks trips or approximately 2,755 annual truck trips (based on a two year average) or 11 trucks per day were hauling biosolids to Tule Ranch. Therefore, the Tule Ranch trips were part of the "baseline" condition described in the PEIR. In addition, the PEIR analyzed, in "program" level detail, the potential environmental effects of a significant increase in biosolids haul truck trips, including impacts on air quality, noise, and traffic. The PEIR evaluated the environmental effects that would result from an additional 9,640 annual biosolids haul truck trips or 38 daily haul truck trips. The purpose of the Addendum was to provide "site specific" or "project- level" analysis of the potential environmental impacts that could result from the Board's approval of certain contracts and its past approval of the 2000 Magan Contract. This analysis confirms that the increase in truck trips to Tule Ranch would not result in any new environmental impacts that were not already addressed in the PEIR or increase the severity of any previously identified significant environmental impact. As the addendum explains, after the Board approved the contract with Shane Magan in January 2000, OCSD increased the number of annual biosolids haul truck trips to Tule Ranch by an average of six (6) truck trips per day, which is well within the increase (38 trips) in daily truck trips contemplated in the PEIR. 3. Comment: The Addendum understates traffic, air quality, noise, and hazards impacts because it only considered the impacts of one way trips or trucks leaving the treatment plants, even though trucks are originating from the processing facilities. The Addendum should have assessed impacts based on round trips. Response: For purposes of analyzing the traffic and air quality impacts of an additional 9,600 biosolids haul truck trips, the PEIR assumed that the biosolids truck trips were "round trips." (See PEIR, pp.s 6.2-5 and 6.5-18). The PEIR assumed "two way trips at 400 miles per trip," which represented the approximate "round trip" distance between the treatment plants and Kern County. (1d.) Based on a "round trip" calculation, the PEIR concluded that Plant No. 1 would generate between 2.6 and 4.1 million vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per year and Plant 2 would generate between 3.8 and 4.32 million VMT per year depending on the treatment scenario that was adopted. As discussed in detail in the Addendum, the increase in biosolids trips to the Tule Ranch and Synagro facilities in Kern County are well within the VMT per year increase that was contemplated in the PEIR and which was the basis for assessing potential air quality and traffic impacts. The Addendum also studied potential route specific traffic impacts and concluded that the addition of biosolids trucks on the affected routes (freeways and arterials) would not have any measurable effects on traffic operations. The conclusion is based on each 527460.1 i contract's nominal contribution of additional truck trips (ranging from eight (8) to ten (10) truck trips per day) relative to the significant volume of traffic that travels daily on the affected roadways. While the Addendum only considered one way trips to the biosolids processing facilities, it is unclear from the comment how assuming "round trips" would affect the analysis the traffic impacts. Even assuming "round trips," the number of biosolids trucks traveling on any given roadway segment at any given time would not change. In other words, no additional truck trips would be added to the affected roadways that could cause a further deterioration in traffic operations. The same number of biosolids trips would merely be traveling in the opposite direction. While the potential traffic impacts of biosolids truck trips on the return route were not evaluated, it is reasonable to assume that traffic conditions along the return route would be similar during the peak traffic periods. 4. Comment: The Addendum's uses an improper"baseline"condition for Tule Ranch because the baseline fails to consider the "agronomic rate"at which biosolids can be safely applied. Addendum ignores a prior OCSD investigation that found excessive nitrogen loading at Tule Ranch rendering Tule Ranch unsuitable for continued biosolids application. Response: The Addendum appropriately establishes a "baseline" condition at Tule Ranch based on the "maximum permitted capacity" of Tule Ranch for the land application of biosolids. Because the various RWQCB permits do not, on their face, establish the "maximum permitted capacity" in terms of biosolids per acre, OCSD reviewed seven (7) years of Annual Biosolids Land Application Reports for Tule Ranch to determine, on average, how many tons of biosolids were land applied per acre at Tule Ranch. On average, Magan was land applying seventy-four (74) wet tons of biosolids per acre over a seven year timeframe. OCSD also contacted Mr. Magan directly for purposes of establishing a "baseline" condition. Mr. Magan indicated that a more conservative 50 WTs per acre should be used for purposes of establishing the "maximum permitted capacity." Therefore, the Addendum used the more conservative "baseline" of 50 WT/acre for purposes of assessing the potential environmental effects of increased land application of biosolids at Tule Ranch after the Board approved the contract with Shane Magan in January, 2000. Even if the Addendum were to assume a more conservative land application rate of 35 WT/acre, the average annual land application rate at Tule Ranch after the Board approve the 2000 contract never exceeded the "maximum permitted capacity." Based on this lower land application rate, Tule Ranch could have beneficially land applied up to 192,500 Wet Tons Per Year ("WTPY") of biosolids (35 WT/acre x 5,500 acres). As documented in the Addendum, on average, Tule Ranch was land applying approximately 160,500 WTPY of biosolids for a three year period (2000 to 2002) after the Board approved the Magan contract and increased shipments to Tule Ranch. This amount would have represented approximately 83% of the "maximum permitted capacity." 527460.1 5. Comment: The Addendum's analysis of traffic impacts is inadequate because (1) it failed to identify site specific haul routes to Tule Ranch & Synagro; (2) the site specific traffic studies were not attached to the Addendum; (3) it failed to consider round trips and therefore understates traffic impacts; (4) it failed to consider the wear and tear that would occur on local Kem roadways from the haul trucks. Response: In response to this comment, the Addendum has been modified to describe the site specific route that would be traveled to each of the facilities identified in the three (3) contracts. In addition, the site specific traffic studies have been attached as Appendix A, B, and C to the Addendum. As noted above, the PEIR assumed that long term biosolids production would result in a significant increase in biosolids trips in terms of VMT and the total VMT was based on round-trip truck trips to Kern County. While the site specific traffic study evaluated potential traffic impacts based on one way trips, this analysis does not understate potential traffic impacts as noted in Response to Comment No. 3 and confirms the PEIR's conclusion that traffic impacts would be less than significant. Finally, the purposes of the Addendum is document that major changes are not required to the PEIR that would trigger the need for a Subsequent EIR to adequately assess the impacts of biosolids hauling contemplated in the three (3) biosolids contracts that are before the Board. As the Addendum explains, the PEIR analyzed the environmental effects of a significant increase in biosolids haul truck traffic. The Addendum explains that the increase in truck trips contemplated under the contracts, which collectively amounts to 28 truck trips per day is well within the increase contemplated in the PEIR. Therefore, the PEIR analysis of environmental effects relating to, for example, air quality, traffic, and noise would not change. Regarding potential wear and tear impacts on local roadways, in 2002, Kern County evaluated the potential environmental effects of an additional 254 truck trips that would be generated by the biosolids recycling facility at the South Kern Industrial Center. (See Draft Supplement to Environmental Impacts Report, South Kern Industrial Center, dated June 2002 ("SKIC SEIR"), p 4.14-15—4.14-17). According to the SKIC SEIR, these additional truck trips would have a less than significant impact on local roadways. (ld.). The SEIR did not identify any significant environmental impacts relating to excessive wear and tear on Kern County roadways due to the potential increase in truck trips. As discussed in the Addendum, OCSD intends to haul ten (10) truck trips per day of biosolids to the SKIC for processing at the Synagro facility. This amounts to approximately five (5) percent of the total truck trips accessing the facility everyday. Similarly, the Addendum assumes that OCSD was hauling an additional six (6) truck trips per day to Tule Ranch after the Board approved the 2000 contract with Magan (note: the traffic study conservatively estimated an additional ten (10) trips.). If an additional 254 truck trips would not create any significant wear and tear impacts on Kern County roadways then it is unclear how six (6), eight (8) or even ten (10) truck trips would create significant wear and tear requiring more detailed analysis in the Addendum or an EIR. 6. Comment: The Addendum's analysis of noise impacts is inadequate because it fails to consider site specific noise impacts in Kern County and instead only addresses 527460.1 a potential noise impacts on roadways near the treatment plants, including Ellis and Brookhurst Streets. Response: As the Addendum explains, site specific noise impacts were addressed in the site specific environmental review that was conducted in conjunction with the permitting of the Tule Ranch and the Synagro facility in the South Kern industrial Center. For example, according to the SKIC SEIR, "no noise sensitive land uses exist, or are presently planned, within the vicinity of the project site....The nearest permitted residential dwelling is located approximately one and half mile to the north of the facility." (SKIC SEIR, p. 4.11-2). Therefore, the Synagro facility at the SKIC would not have any significant noise impact due to an increase in trucks accessing the facility. Under the proposed Synagro contract, OCSD would generate eight (8) of the 264 daily truck trips accessing the SKIC every day. Regarding Tule Ranch, OCSD was shipping eleven (11) truck loads per day of biosolids to Tule Ranch prior to January 2000 when the Board approved the Magan contract. In addition to OCSD biosolids shipments, other sanitary sewer providers in southern California were hauling approximately 92,000 WTPY of biosolids to Tule Ranch. Therefore, Tule Ranch was already generating noise impacts from biosolids haul truck trips entering and leaving the facility. Moreover, as the Addendum explains, Tule Ranch could accept a far greater number of haul truck trips based on its "maximum permitted capacity." Even after the Board approved the Magan contract and increased the number of biosolids shipments to Tule Ranch, Tule Ranch was still operating well below its permitted capacity. 7. Comment: The Addendum's analysis of air quality impacts is inadequate because (1) it fails to analyze air quality impacts along the haul routes to Tule Ranch and Synagro (2) fails to identify the "baseline"condition along routes in Kern County, which are within then San Joaquin Valley Basin, a severe non-attainment area for ozone (03) and serious nonattainment for particulate matter(PM10); (3) it fails to analyze potential Toxic Air Contaminant (TAC) impacts along affected routes from diesel particulates, (4) it fails to address potential air quality impacts that would result from the diversion of haul truck trips to Arizona and other areas due to local land use restrictions on the land application of biosolids in Kern and Kings County. Response: The Addendum concluded that any potential air quality impacts from the nominal increase in biosolids haul truck trips (six (6) to ten (10) trips) were adequately addressed in the 1999 PEIR because the increase in trips was well within the increase in biosolids truck trips contemplated in the 1999 PEIR. The comment does not explain how the addition of six (6) to ten (10) truck along haul routes to Tule Ranch and the Synagro facility in Kern County would create some new potentially significant air quality impact that requires further analysis in the Addendum or an EIR. As discussed in the Addendum, the PEIR's analysis of potential air quality impacts was based upon the projected air pollutant emissions of an additional 9,640 annual biosolids haul truck trips. The PEIR assumed that Tule Ranch in Kern County would be the destination for a portion of these trips. In addition, while the PEIR did not assess potential impacts on air 527460.1 quality in the San Joaquin Valley Basin ("SJVB"), and instead focused on impacts to the South Coast Air Basin, the analysis of potential impacts to the SJVB would be virtually the same considering that both the SJVB and the SCAB are in non-attainment for the same criteria pollutants, namely 03 and PM10. Finally, it is unclear from the comment how an additional six (6) haul truck trips would generate toxic contaminants, such as diesel particulates, would noticeably increase the amount of TAC that are currently generated by truck traffic along the affected routes. For example, the Traffic Impacts Analysis conducted for Tule Ranch contract documents that between 175 and 31,171 trucks per day travel along the route to Tule Ranch (See TIA, Table 2, p. 6). The Traffic Impacts Analyses for the Synagro and EnerTech facilities identify similar existing truck traffic volumes. The Synargo and EnerTech analyses note that between 1,077 and 26,085 and 149 to 23,186 trucks per day travel along the affected routes. Regarding a potential increase in air quality impacts related to increased shipments to Arizona due to Kings County and Kern County local land use restrictions, these land use restrictions were not in effect when the Board approved the Magan contract in 2000. The Kings County and Measure E were adopted in 2006. As the Addendum explains, one of the purposes of the Addendum is the comply with the Court of Appeal's ruling in CSD No. 2 v. County of Kern that OCSD was required to conduct CEQA review prior to approving the January, 2000 contract with Shane Magan. Therefore, the exercise required OCSD to essentially go back in time for purposes of conducting the CEQA analysis. When the Board approved the Magan contract in January 2000, the land use restrictions referenced in the letter would not have affected the CEQA analysis because they did not exist. 8. Comment: The Addendum does not address the potential land use impacts of biosolids disposal at Tule Ranch in light of the February, 2006 King County Ordinance that bans the land application of all biosolids, except class EQ biosolids and Kern County's Measure E that bans the land application of any biosolids. These restrictions will require OCSD to divert more biosolids to Arizona and other areas. Response: Please see Comment 7 regarding the scope of CEQA review of the Board's January 2000 approval of the contract with Shane Magan. These land use restriction were adopted in 2006, six years after the Board approved the Magan contract. 9. Comment: The Addendum does not comply with the CSD No. 2 v. County of Kern because the Addendum fails to analyze the potential hauling impacts on the "regional welfare." Specifically, the Addendum should address potential impacts of shipping increasing amount of biosolids out of Orange County for disposal in other counties, including Kem and Kings County. Response: The comment generally states that the Addendum needs to address potential hauling impacts on the "regional welfare." However, the comment fails to explain how a nominal increase in the biosolids haul truck trips will affect the regional welfare. Consistent with CEQA, the Addendum has been prepared to document the potential "site specific" environmental effects of hauling biosolids to Tule Ranch, 527460.1 u Synagro, and EnerTech. The Addendum, along with the site specific environmental review that has previously been performed for the receiver sites, adequately addresses the potential environmental effects of the hauling and disposal of biosolids at the receiver sites. 527460-1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To 13d.of Dir. 02/28/07 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 8d Orange County Sanitation District FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager SUBJECT: CHANGES TO RULES OF PROCEDURE & DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY RESOLUTIONS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt the following resolutions to change the name of the Engineering & Operations Committee to Operations Committee, and Finance & Administration Committee to Administration Committee- (1) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD07-03, Establishing Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Business of the District, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD06-25; and. (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 07-04, Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Award of Purchase Orders and Contracts; Award of Public Works Project Contracts; Professional Services Contracts; and Delegation of Authority to Implement said Policies and Procedures; and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 06-28. SUMMARY It has been determined that the names of the standing committees be changed to Administration Committee (formerly Finance & Administration) and the Operations Committee (formerly Engineering & Operations). . PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS Resolution No. OCSD 06-25, Rules of Procedure, was adopted in November 2006, and Resolution No. OCSD 06-28, Delegation of Authority, was adopted in December 2006. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A HldepttagendatBoard Agenda Reports12007 Board Agenda ReportM020711tem 8(d)_Administration and Operations Committees doc Revised, 8/20/98 Page 1 9 MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, January 24, 2007, at 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, January 24, 2007 at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Jim Ruth, General Manager Jim Ferryman, Chair Bob Ghirelli,Assistant General Manager Doug Davert, Vice Chair Nick Arhontes, Director of Operations and Mark Waldman, F&A Committee Chair Maintenance Lary Crandall, E&O Committee Chair Ed Torres, Director of Technical Services Steve Anderson, Past Board Chair Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Phil Luebben, F&A Committee Vice Chair Administrative Services Cathy Green, E&O Committee Vice Chair John Linder, Engineering Manager Jim Burror, Engineering Supervisor DIRECTORS ABSENT Michael Gold, Legislative Affairs Liaison Gail Garrett, Committee Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager Bradley R. Hogin, General Counsel Martin Holl, Associate Engineer Craig Farrington, Counsel David Francis, Source Control Inspector Terry Andrus, Counsel Kelly Christensen, Source Control Supervisor Scott Baugh, Lobbyist Kim Christensen, Lab Supervisor Holly Fraumeni, Lobbyist Angela Brandt, Accounting Supervisor Jackie Nutting, ABC Kelly Ross, Senior Laboratory Analyst Eric Christen, CFEC Chris Pelletier, Maintenance Specialist Deborah Chadwick, Court Reporter Juanita Skillman, Records Management Specialist George Rivera, Security Specialist (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Jackie Nutting, Government Affairs Director for Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC), Southern California Chapter, provided comments re design build and asked the Board to consider a draft resolution she provided. Eric Christen, Executive Director, Coalition of Fair Employment(CFEC), provided copies of IBEW Proposed Electrical Safety ordinance and email correspondence from Doug Chappel, IBEW, to District's General Manager, Jim Ruth. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 January 24, 2007 General Manager Jim Ruth reported that, as a result of Mr. Chappell's demand that the RFP stipulation mandate all projects over$200,000, he and District staff have cut off negotiations with IBEW at this time. He and Michael Gold, Legislative Affairs Liaison, will meet with IBEW representatives in the next 30 days to resume negotiations and explore other possible options. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Ferryman announced the 2007 CASA Washington DC Conference March 12-14. Notify Gail Garrett, Committee Secretary, if you will be attending the conference. Steve Anderson, Darryl Miller, and staff attended the January CASA Conference in Indian Wells, California. Mr. Anderson will provide a report to the Board tonight. Mr. Ferryman, Mr. Ruth, and Dr. Ghirelli met with the new General Manager and several SAWPA board members last week to discuss the SARI line relocation. Mr. Ferryman explained his goal is to work closely with the SAWPA board and staff to ensure that the project stays on track and to develop a financial plan to pay for the relocation. Chair Ferryman announced the upcoming committee meetings for February and the special New Board Member Orientation workshop scheduled for Thursday, February 1 from 8:00 a.m. -12:00 p.m. (5) REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER Mr. Ruth provided highlights of his activities for the past year in his January Status Report, which was included with the Board package. (6) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Brad Hogin explained that he will be recusing himself from the Hawk Industrial Uniform appeal hearing. Craig Farrington will prosecute the appeal and Terry Andrus will advise the Steering Committee during this hearing. Mr. Hogin exited the room at 5:47 p.m. (7) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve minutes of the December 20, 2006 Steering Committee meeting. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (8) ACTION ITEMS a. Hawk Industrial Uniform Appeal Hearing Mr. Ferryman announced the appeal by Hawk Industrial Uniform Company of the General Manager's decision to suspend Hawk's Wastewater Discharge Permit and Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 January 24, 2007 impose fees and penalties for alleged violations of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations. He explained the proceeding is governed by the Rules of Procedure adopted by Resolution No. OCSD 98-13 and transcribed by a certified court reporter. Mr. Ferryman declared the hearing open at 5:50 p.m. Craig Farrington, staff counsel, explained he would prosecute the appeal hearing and introduced Ms. Deborah Chadworth, court reporter, who will provide a transcript of the hearing to be received and filed at a later meeting. No one appeared for the Permittee. Staff provided a brief presentation outlining the measures taken to enforce compliance by the permittee. Three documents, Exhibits "I" and "J", and the proposed decision and findings, were introduced and placed in the record. Mr. Ferryman called a five-minute recess at 6:01 p.m. for the Steering Committee to review the proposed decision and findings provided by staff counsel. Mr. Ferryman declared the hearing closed at 6:10 p.m. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Adopt the prepared Decision and Findings submitted by staff to uphold the determination of the General Manager and the monetary penalties in the amount of$126,293.23 and that the permit suspension shall continue for a minimum of thirty(30) days and until the total amount of$126,293.23 is received by the District, and until all necessary pretreatment equipment is installed and fully operational to District Staffs satisfaction; and, (2) Authorize Counsel to proceed immediately with filing a court order with contempt power(or a writ) enforcing immediate shutdown of Hawk's facilities. After being advised by Ms. Mahin Talebi that the District has the authority to administratively terminate Hawk's permit and shut down his facility to stop further contamination, it was then: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Staff was further directed to terminate Hawk Industrial Uniform's permit and shut down the Hawk Industrial Uniform facility immediately. Mr. Hogin returned at 6:15 p.m. b. Design-Build Legislation Michael Gold provided an update on recent staff meetings with union representatives and explained the practical limits of IBEW's request to apply apprenticeship training requirements to all projects, not only those over$10 million as originally proposed. Staff will continue to actively seek possible solutions to the union requests and work towards passing a bill granting design-build authority. Scott Baugh and Holly Fraumeni answered Directors questions and gave them a political perspective on the design-build issue. Mr. Baugh added that Senator Lou Correa, and Assemblymen Mike Duvall and Jim Silva, having been past District Board members, would reject ABC's letter to Orange County legislators implying the District had entered into inappropriate negotiations with the unions. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 January 24, 2007 ' Mr. Baugh suggested the Steering Committee allow staff to introduce a bill to meet statutory deadlines and explained that changes could easily be made after the Steering Committee meets on February 28. It was then: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Direct staff to (a) continue to negotiate with the unions and others, and (b) introduce desi n-build legislation to keep the District's options open and meet the February 23` filing deadline. (9) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-60— Lemon Heights Annexation Jim Burror, Engineering Supervisor, informed that staff will be requesting the Board to approve the annexation of 70 properties in the Lemon Heights area at a cost of $26,000. These costs will be reimbursed by the property owners when they connect to a sewer. Estimated fees to be collected from the 70 property owners in the future is approximately$605,000. b. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in February were reviewed. C. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to the Board at the January 24, 2007 meeting were reviewed. (10) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (13) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 7 p.m. (14) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:28 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Sections 54957(b)(1), 54956.9(b), and 54956.9(a)to discuss four matters. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Clerk of the Board. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Steering Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 5 January 24, 2007 Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Clerk of the Board in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the recommended actions will be publicly reported at the time the approved actions become final. At 6:40 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (15) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Submitted by: Gai Garrett Steering Committee Secretary H.,WeptlagendalCommitteeslSteertng CommdteeW06Winutes1122006 SC Minutes.dx MINUTES OF THE ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, February 7, 2007—5:00 P.M. A meeting of the Engineering and Operations Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on February 7, 2007, at 5:00 p.m. in the Sanitation District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: E & O Directors Present: Staff Present: Larry Crandall, Chair Jim Ruth, General Manager Cathy Green, Vice Chair Bob Ghirelli, Assistant General Manager Steve Anderson Nick Arhontes, Dir. of Operations & Maintenance Charles Antos Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering Don Bankhead Ed Torres, Director of Technical Services Roy Moore Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and David Shawver Administrative Services Harry Sidhu Lilia Kovac, Committee Secretary Constance Underhill Tod Haynes, Engineering Manager Don Webb Matt Smith, Engineering Manager Doug Davert, Board Vice Chair Chuck Windsor, Engineering Manager John Linder, Engineering Manager E & O Directors Absent: Patsy Marshall Others: James M. Ferryman, Board Chair Norbert Gaia Jim Clark Juanita Skillman Joe Forbath, General Counsel (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Crandall did not give a report. Minutes of the E & O Committee ' February 7, 2007 Page 2 (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER No report was given. (6) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. Approve minutes of the December 6, 2006 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services (OMTS) Committee meeting and minutes of the December 7, 2006 Planning, Design and Construction (PDC) Committee meeting. Directors Underhill and Green abstained. b. E&O07-01 MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with KOMEX for Underground Storage Tank Evaluation and Remediation at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-98, for an additional amount of$39,487, increasing the total amount not to exceed $135,718. C. E&O07-02 MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 31 to Primary Clarifiers Nos. 16- 31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$16,964, increasing the total contract amount to $72,897,044. d. E&O07-03 MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with MDS Consulting to provide for additional services for Surveying Services, Specification No. PSA-2003-176, for an additional amount of$50,000, increasing the total contract amount not to exceed $550,000. e. E&007-04 MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve a budget increase of$440,000 to the budget for Rehabilitation of Westside Pump Station, Contract No. 3-52, for a total budget amount of$8,731,000. f. E&007-05 MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Amendment No. 4 to Cooperative Projects Program Contract No. 0130 with the City of Orange providing for a time extension with no additional funding. (7) ACTION ITEMS a. E&007-06 MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 22 to Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, with Steve P. Rados, Inc., authorizing an addition of$251,350, increasing the total contract amount to $31,116,026. w Minutes of the E & O Committee February 7, 2007 Page 3 Directors required clarification on legality of traffic impact fees. General Counsel Brad Hogin will investigate and report back to the committee at the next committee meeting. b. E&007-07 MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to: (1)Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Black and Veatch for engineering services for Power Monitoring and Control at Plants No. 1 and No. 2, Job No. J-33-3, for an amount not to exceed $1,184,736; and, (2)Approve a 20% contingency ($236,947). Directors requested that a summary of bids with scores received to be included in future agenda reports. C. E&007-08 MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Dudek &Associates, Inc., providing for additional engineering services for Rehabilitation of District Siphons, Contract No. 2-68, for an additional amount of$164,000, increasing the total contract amount not to exceed $1,151,156. d. E&O07-09 MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to: (1) Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell to provide construction support services for Trickling Filters at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-90, for an additional amount of$7,480,600, increasing the total contract amount not to exceed $17,563,820; and, (2) Approve a 6% contingency ($448,836). e. E&007-10 MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve a budget increase of$2,844,000 to the budget for Rehabilitation of College Avenue Pump Station, Contract No. 7-47, for a total budget amount of$10,820,000. (8) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS There were none. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING No report was given. Minutes of the E & O Committee February 7, 2007 ` Page 4 (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Nick Arhontes, Director of Operations and Maintenance, reported that compliments had been given by an out-of-state visitor to the Sanitation District plant for its lack of foul odor; also, a letter of complaint was received from a Huntington Beach resident citing foul odors. (11) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES No report was given. (12) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT (14) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in closed session at 5:40 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)to discuss Agenda Item No. 14(a). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Clerk of the Board have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Clerk of the Board in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Meetings. (15) FUTURE MEETING DATES The next Engineering and Operations Committee meeting is scheduled for March 7, 2007, at 5:00 p.m. (16) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:04 p.m. Submitted by: �oL-- U16 Kovac Committee Secretary Engineering and Operations Committee H:\dept\agenda\Committees\Operations Committee\Operatlons 2007\0207\020707 E&O Minutes.doc E&O COMMITTEE Meeting Date To 13d.of Dir. 02/07/07 02/28/07 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number E&007-02 10(b) Orange County Sanitation District Primary Treatment FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering SUBJECT: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS.16-31 AND RELATED FACILITIES, JOB NO. P1-37 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 31 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of $16,964, increasing the total contract amount to $72,897,044. SUMMARY • Job Number P1-37, Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, includes the construction of 16 new primary clarifiers with all support equipment, improvements to existing Primary Clarifiers 6-15, and improvements to Primary Clarifiers 1-5. • Brown and Caldwell prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Margate Construction on October 24, 2001. • This change order includes ten items of work and two credit items. There are nine nonreimbursable design errors associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this project are $3,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. The project is 97.16% complete. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS The contract was awarded by the Board of Directors on October 24, 2001. Please refer to the attached Change Order Status Report for more information on previous change orders. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Contract Schedule Contract Start Date January 7, 2002 Original Contract Completion Date November 6, 2005 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 31 Current Contract Completion Date February 14, 2007 Actual Completion Date N/A Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 1 Change Order No. 31 Content , Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Raise Existing Steam Pipe 0 Nonreimbursable 113 Design Error 2 Temporary Air Agitation Connection 3,852 0 Nonreimbursable Design Error 3 Welding of Concrete Reinforcing 2,057 0 Nonreimbursable Steel at Center Feed Channel Design Error 4 Ferric Chloride and Polymer Feed 6,763 0 Staff Requested Pump Repair Design Change 5 Credit for Deletion of Work in (11,369) 0 Unknown Conditions Eastside Distribution Structure and Junction Box A 6 Remove Temporary Sump Pump 1,427 0 Nonreimbursable Discharge Piping Design Error 7 Seal Top of Center Feed Channel 1,179 0 Nonreimbursable Knock-out Wall Design Error 8 Primary Clarifiers 6-15 Agitation Air 9,276 0 Nonreimbursable Piping Modifications Design Error 9 Delete Moisture Proofing on Concrete (31,680) 0 Staff Requested Walls Design Change 10 Primary Clarifiers 3 and 4 Existing 15,507 0 Nonreimbursable Pipe and Concrete Modifications Design Error 11 Re-feed Primary Influent Splitter Box 9,074 0 Nonreimbursable Receptacles Design Error 12 HVAC Equipment Fire Alarm 10,765 0 Nonreimbursable Shutdown I Design Error Total Change Order 1 $16,9641 0 This change order complies with authority levels of the Orange County Sanitation District's Delegation of Authority. This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 52). ATTACHMENT Change Order Status Report MP:el:kf HAntglobalWgenda Draft Reports\PMN-37 CO-31-AR.doc 2 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 16-31 AND RELATED FACILITIES JOB NO. P1-37 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHUKIZFAUTHORIZED TIME ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE(DAYS) CONTRACT 6/23/1999 $ 70,366,000.00 $ 70,366,000.00 0.00 1400 1400 CO NO. 1 12/19/2001 $ 0.00 $ 70,366,000.00 0.00 0 1400 * CO NO. 2 8/1/2002 $ 75,214.00 $ 70,441,214.00 0.11 49 1449 **CO NO. 3 10/21/2002 $ 48,736.00 $ 70,489.950.00 0.18 0 1449 CO NO. 4 12/18/2002 $ 356,059.00 $ 70,846,009.00 0.68 82 1531 CO NO. 5 2/26/2003 $ 33,527.00 $ 70,879,536.00 0.73 0 1531 CO NO. 61 4/23/2003 $ 54,992.00 $ 70,934,528.00 0.81 21 1552 CO NO. 7 6/25/2003 1 14,750.00 $ 70,949,278.00 0.83 0 1552 CO NO. 8 8/27/2003 $ 5,363.00 $ 70,954,641.00 0.84 0 1552 CO NO. 9 10/22/2003 1 187,452.00 $ 71,142,093.00 1.10 0 1552 CO NO. 10 11/19/2003 $ 56,041.00 $ 71,198,134.00 1.18 0 1552 CO NO. 11 12/4/2003 $ 20,680.00 $ 71,218,814.00 1.21 0 1552 CO NO. 12 2/25/2004 $ 22,390.00 $ 71,241,204.00 1.24 0 1552 CO NO. 13 3/24/2004 $ 784.00 $ 71,241,988.00 1.24 0 1552 CO NO. 14 5/26/2004 $ 67,455.00 $ 71,309,443.00 1.34 0 1552 CO NO. 15 10/27/2004 $ 67,937.00 $ 71,377,380.00 1.44 143 1695 CO NO. 16 12/15/2004 $ (160,121.00) $ 71,217,259.00 1.21 0 1695 CO NO. 17 2/23/2005 $ 127,478.00 $ 71,344,737.00 1.39 0 1695 CO NO. 18 3/23/2005 $ 61,690.00 $ 71,406,427.00 1.48 0 1695 CO NO. 19 4/27/2005 $ 116,710.00 $ 71,523,137.00 1.64 0 1695 CO NO. 20 5/25/2005 $ 84,955.00 $ 71,608,092.00 1.77 28 1723 CO NO. 21 7/20/2005 $ 100,648.00 $ 71,708,740.00 1.90 0 1723 CO NO. 22 9/28/2005 $ 48,078.00 $ 71,756,818.00 1.97 0 1723 CO NO. 23 10/26/2005 $ 117,648.00 $ 71,874.466.00 2.14 0 1723 CO NO, 24 12/21/2005 $ 97,562.00 $ 71,972,028.00 2.28 0 1723 CO NO.25 2/22/2006 $ 116,822.00 $ 72.088.850.00 2.44 0 1723 CO NO. 26 5/24/2006 $ 272,749.00 $ 72,361,599.00 2.84 142 1865 CO NO. 27 6/28/2006 $ 314,921.00 $ 72,676,520.00 3.28 0 1865 CO NO. 28 9/27/2006 $ 83,637.00 $ 72,760,157.00 3.40 0 1865 CO NO. 291 10/25/2006 $ 67,329.00 $ 72,827,486.00 3.50 0 1865 CO NO. 301 11/15/2006 $ 52,594.00 $ 72,880,080.00 3.57 0 1865 -CO NO.31 Pending $ 16,964.00 $ `'72,897,9-- 3.60 0 1865 ** Approved by PDC Committee per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 EDMS:003822984 * Approved by General Manager per delagated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 E & O COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 02/07/07 02/28/07 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number E&007-03 10 c Orange County Sanitation District `-) Misc.& r Support Projects FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR SURVEYING SERVICES, SPECIFICATION NO. 2003-176 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with MDS Consulting to provide for additional services for Survey Services, Specification No. PSA-2003-176, for an additional amount of $50,000, increasing the total contract amount not to exceed $550,000. SUMMARY • In May 2004, the Board of Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for professional survey services. Two Amendments have been issued since that time. • Surveying is done as needed and billed directly to the projects requiring the work. It is now projected that an additional $50,000 will be needed to provide continuing survey services until the end of the fiscal year (June 30, 2007) because of additional work required for the Bushard Trunk Sewer. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS • Approval of PSA with MDS Consulting for an amount not to exceed $150,000 (Board — May 2004). • Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the PSA with MDS Consulting for $200,000, increasing the contract total amount not to exceed $350,000 (Board - May 2005). • Approval of Amendment No. 2 to the PSA with MDS Consulting for $150,000, increasing the contract total amount not to exceed $500,000 (Board - May 2006). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This Amendment complies with authority levels of the Orange County Sanitation District's (Sanitation District) Delegation of Authority. This item has been budgeted, the work will be billed to existing Capital Improvement Projects when necessary. Award Date: 05/26/04 Contract Amount: $150,000 ' Contingency W N/A *No contingency is being requested. $50.000 is enough to finish out this Fiscal Year contract. JH:CW:kf H:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\PSA 2003-176.doc Page 1 E & O COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 02/07/07 02/28/07 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number E&007-04 10 d Orange County Sanitation District g Collections T r Facilities FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF WESTSIDE PUMP STATION. CONTRACT NO. 3-52 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a budget increase of $440,000 for Rehabilitation of Westside Pump Station. Contract No. 3-52, for a total budget amount of $8,731 ,000. SUMMARY • This project will rehabilitate the Westside Pump Station. The rehabilitation includes the design and construction of mechanical, electrical, instrumentation and controls, structural, landscape, and architectural improvements to bring the facility into compliance with the Orange County Sanitation District (Sanitation District) Standards. • A Construction Cost Opinion was prepared by the Consultant and submitted with the Final Design Package. The construction cost is estimated at approximately $5,200,000. An increase to the existing budget is necessary to account for the Consultant's revised cost estimate. • The increase in cost is mainly associated with by-pass pumping activities, additional landscaping, and the structural retrofitting of the wet well structure. The original Scope of Work (SOW) for this project did not account for landscaping, structural retrofitting of the wet well, demolition and construction of a new access gate, and the need for additional by-pass pumping activities to maintain the pump station running at all times during the construction of the recommended facilities. This additional work was discovered during the final design process. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS • July 2004 —Approval of Professional Services Agreement with PBS&J for an amount not to exceed $1,164,721. Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This increase in the project budget complies with authority levels of the Sanitation District's Delegation of Authority. This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 22). The overall program cost is forecast to be under the current budgeted amount even with this requested budget increase. JH:AC:kf:bm:kf K\ntglobahAgenda Draft Reports\PDC\3-52 WESTSIDE PS 02-2007.2 E&O AR.doc Page 2 E & O COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 02/07/07 02/28/07 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number E&007-05 10 e Orange County Sanitation District ��� Misc.& �y Support Projects FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering SUBJECT: COOPERATIVE PROJECTS GRANT PROGRAM, JOB NO. J-73 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 4 to Cooperative Projects Program Contract No. 0130 with the City of Orange, providing for a time extension with no additional funding. SUMMARY • The Cooperative Projects Grants Program (Program) provides funds to local agencies for projects that reduce or eliminate inflow and infiltration (1/1) to the sewer collection system. • The City of Orange (City) requires a time extension to Cooperative Projects Program Contract No. 0130 (Contract), to complete installation of an adequate storm drain system. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS • Approval of Amendment No. 3 for a time extension to Cooperative Projects Program Contract No. 0130 with the City of Orange (Board - February 2006). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This time extension complies with authority levels of the Sanitation District's Delegation of Authority. This item has been budgeted (Line item: Section 5, Pages 1 and 4). AA:gc:kf H:\dept\agenda\Committees\E&O\E&O 2007\0207\07-05.J-73 Co-op.doc Form No.Dw-102-2 Re,; ed 0i,o8'0; Page 1 E & O COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 02/07/07 02/28/07 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number E&007-06 10(f) Orange County Sanitation District Collections .� Facilities FROM: James D Ruth, General Manager Originator: Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering SUBJECT: BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION, JOB NO. 1-2-4 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 22 to Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, with Steve P. Rados. Inc.. authorizing an addition of $251 ,350, increasing the total contract amount to $31,116,026. SUMMARY • Job No. 1-2-4, Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, includes the installation of 21 ,600 linear feet (just over four miles) of 108-inch reinforced concrete pipe, manholes, junction structures, and miscellaneous utility relocations. • Boyle Engineering Corporation prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Steve P. Rados, Inc. on June 26, 2002. • Scope changes and timing constraints required modification of Job No. 1-2-4 to include new Job No. 1-24A. the work in the Ellis and Bushard Intersection. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS The contract was awarded by the Board of Directors on June 26, 2002. Please refer to the attached Change Order Status Report for information on all previous change orders. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Contract Schedule Contract Start Date September 16. 2002 Original Contract Completion Date March 18, 2004 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 22 Current Contract Completion Date June 20, 2007 Actual Completion Date N/A Days Subject to Liquidated Damages N/A Page 1 Change Order No. 22 Content Item No. Description Amount Days Type 1 Revised Insurance $80,000 0 Other Requirements — City of Fountain Valli 2 Encroachment Permit Fees — $120.000 0 Other City of Fountain Valley 3 Additional Quantity for Bid $51 .350 0 Other Item 5.3, Increased from 395,000 Square Feet to 494,000 Square Feet as Described in Bid Item 5.0 Total Change Order No. 20 $251,350 0 Items 1 and 2 are due to changed conditions insurance requirements and encroachment permit requirements within the City of Fountain Valley. Item 3 increases Bid Item 5.3 to allow enough capacity in that item to pay the contractor for all necessary work within the City of Huntington Beach. This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 48). Project contingency funds will be used for this amendment. ATTACHMENTS Change Order Status Report JH:DM:sp:kf Kntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\I-2-4A CO#22 Rados 010807 Page 2 b CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT BUSHARD TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION JOB NO. 1-2-4 CO #22 CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED ITEM APPROVAL DATE TIME TIME TO DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT June 26, 2002 $30,003,210 $30,003,210 550 550 CO NO. 1* April 23, 2003 $150,000 $30,153,210 0.50% 0 550 CO NO. 2 June 25, 2003 $107,724 $30,260,934 0.86% 2*** 552 CO NO. 3 October 22, 2003 $44,293 $30,305,227 1.01% 1*** 553 CO NO. 4 February 25, 2004 $380,251 $30,685,478 2.27% 0 553 CO NO. 5 March 24, 2004 $409,301 $31,094,779 3.64% 0 553 CO NO. 6 May 26, 2004 $27,612 $31,122,391 3.73% 5*** 558 CO NO. 7 June 23, 2004 $163,618 $31,286,009 4.28% 0 558 CO NO. 8 July 21, 2004 $230,317 $31,516,326 5.04% 0 558 CO NO. 9 September 22, 2004 $153,119 $31,669,445 5.55% 0 558 CO NO. 10 November 17, 2004 $242,360 $31,911,805 6.36% 0 558 CO NO. 11 December 15, 2004 $0 $31,911,805 6.36% 49*** 607 CO NO. 12 December 15, 2004 $0 $31,911,805 6.36% 27*** 634 CO NO. 13 February 23, 2004 $225,331 $32,137,136 7.11% 7*** 641 CO NO. 14 March 23, 2005 $98,750 $32,235,886 7.44% 0 641 CO NO. 15 June 22, 2005 $28,253 $32,264,139 7.54% 0 641 CO NO. 16* August 22, 2005 $3,422,266.80 $35,686,405.80 18.94% 0 641 CO NO. 17 October 26, 2005 $23,707.00 $35,710,112.80 19.02% 0 641 CO NO. 18 February 22, 2006 -$823,407.00 $34,886,705.80 16.28% 0 641 CO NO. 19 July 19, 2006 -$4,358,204.00 $30,528,501.80 1.75% 0 641 CO NO, 20 September 27, 2006 $151,375.00 $30,679,876.80 2.26% 0 641 CO NO. 21 December 20, 2006 $184,799.00 $30,864,675.80 2.87% 0 N/A*** o .0 N/A*** CO NO. 22 Pendin' $251,350.00 $31,1160025.80 3.11 A *Approved by PDC Committee per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 **Approved by General Manager pursuant to Settlement Agreement and Release effective 8/1/05 ***Authorized Time to Date was replaced with a new contract end date of June 20, 2007, per terms of the Settlement Agreement and Release. Accordingly, all time extensions granted in prior change orders are null and void. EDMS 003825205 E & O COMMITTEE Meeting Date To 13d.of Dir. 02/07/07 02/28/07 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number E&007-07 10 Orange County Sanitation District ®Plant Automation Computerization FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Jim Herberg. Director of Engineering SUBJECT: POWER MONITORING AND CONTROL AT PLANTS NO. 1 AND NO. 2, JOB NO. J-33-3 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Black and Veatch for engineering services for Power Monitoring and Control at Plants No. 1 and No. 2, Job No. J-33-3, for an amount not to exceed $1 ,184,736. and 2. Approve a 20% contingency ($236,947). SUMMARY • The purpose of this project is to provide a power monitoring and control SCADA system which will protect the plants from power outage problems and will reduce the recovery time when problems do occur. The system will monitor and control the electrical distribution systems at both plants to better utilize our generation capacity during SCE power outages which will reduce the chance of spills. The system will provide increased safety to electrical maintenance staff by allowing operation of medium voltage and low voltage circuit breakers from a remote location. • Requests for Proposal were sent to seven engineering firms and three firms provided a proposal to the Orange County Sanitation District (Sanitation District). • The proposed fee was evaluated on a task-by-task basis to determine each task's cost/benefit ratio. If the cost/benefit ratio for a task was determined too high and the task could be eliminated by having the Sanitation District staff perform it, the task was eliminated. Programming standards and programming database were such tasks. If the cost/benefit ratio for a task was determined to be too high and the task could not be eliminated. the fee was negotiated. In addition, the consultant was asked to propose alternatives to the design deliverables in the scope of work and Black & Veatch proposed several areas where the design could be streamlined without reducing quality. This negotiation reduced the proposed fee more than 50%. Some of the tasks that were eliminated or reduced may be reinstated depending on decisions made during the Preliminary Design Report phase. In lieu of signing a contract with tasks that may or may not be required.. a 20% contingency is requested. Page 1 PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS None. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The consultant selection process was conducted in accordance with the Sanitation District's adopted policies and procedures. This Professional Service Agreement (PSA) complies with authority levels of the Sanitation District's Delegation of Authority. This item has been budgeted (Line item: Section 8, Page 88). Project contingency funds will be used for this PSA. Award Date: 02/28/07 Contract Amount: $1,184.736 Contingency %: 20% MP:kf H:\dept\agenda\Committees\E&O\E&O 2007\0207\07-07.J-33-3.doc Page 2 E & O COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 02/07/07 02/28/07 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number E&007-08 10 h Orange County Sanitation District Collections Facilities FROM: James D. Ruth. General Manager Originator: Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF DISTRICT SIPHONS, CONTRACT NO. 2-68 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Dudek & Associates, Inc. providing for additional engineering services for Rehabilitation of District Siphons. Contract No. 2-68, for an additional amount of $164.000. increasing the total contract amount not to exceed $1,151,156. SUMMARY • This project will rehabilitate 16 of the 87 siphons owned by the Orange County Sanitation District (Sanitation District) within the service areas. The rehabilitation includes all work necessary to install foul air by-pass lines at each of the 16 siphons to minimize odor impacts. • The additional fees requested are necessary to cover the consultant's fees associated with extensive encroachment permit coordination with the eight cities where these facilities are located. Additionally, the consultant had to develop a new method for air by-pass line sizing based on field measurements and work with a level of complexity due to horizontal and vertical clearances not considered during the Request for Proposal (RFP) process. • This additional coordination effort with the different cities and the County of Orange were not included in the original Scope of Work (SOW). The cities requested additional traffic control plans not covered under the original SOW, and the County of Orange required additional reviews to some of the alignments of the proposed facilities near their storm facilities, which will be updated in the near future. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS • Approval of PSA with Dudek & Associates, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $987,156 (Board — October 2004). Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This Amendment No. 1 complies with authority levels of the Sanitation District's Delegation of Authority. This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8. Page 22). Award Date: 10/27/04 Contract Amount: $987,156 *Contingency W N/A * No contingency is being requested. The money being requested is enough to complete the design of this project. JH:AC:kf H:\dept\agenda\Committees\E&O\E&O 2007\0207\07-08.2-68.doc Page 2 E & O COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 02/07/07 02/28/07 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number E&007-09 10 i Orange County Sanitation District l L= Secondary Treatment FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering SUBJECT: TRICKLING FILTERS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-90 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell to provide construction support services for Trickling Filters at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-90, for an additional amount of $7,480,600, increasing the total contract amount not to exceed $ 17,563,820; and 2. Approve a 2.5% contingency ($440,000). SUMMARY • The purpose Job No. P2-90 is to construct 60 MGD of additional secondary treatment at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-90 is one of four design projects designated by the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as required in order to meet the Orange County Sanitation District's (Sanitation District) secondary consent decree requirements. • Brown and Caldwell completed the design of the trickling filter project and construction support services are required which include reviewing submittals, responding to requests for information, preparing design modifications, attending construction meeting and site visits, preparing operations manuals, performing specialty inspections, participating in commissioning activities, and preparing record drawings. • These construction support services shall be authorized only as requested and managed by the Sanitation District's Project Manager. The proposed fee is reasonable for a project of this magnitude and is consistent with fees for similar services on past Sanitation District projects. • A 2.5% contingency for potential consultant amendments is being requested per the Sanitation District's Delegation of Authority. Form No.DW-102-2 Agenda Report—E&O Revised 12/06/06 Page 1 PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS JOB NO. P2-90 • June 2004 - Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for an amount not to exceed $9,586,445. • June 2006 —Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for $99,095, increasing the contract total amount not to exceed $9,685.540. • July 2006 - Approval of Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for $397,680, increasing the contract total amount not to exceed $10,083,220. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This Amendment No. 3 complies with authority levels of the Sanitation District's Delegation of Authority. This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8. Page 56). Award Date. 02/28/07 Contract Amount: $7,480,600 Contingency%: 2.5% JH:KM:kf:bm-kf H:\dept\agenda\Committees\Operations Corn mittee\Operations 2007\0207\07-09.P2-90-Revised.doc Form No.DW-102-2 Agenda Report-E&O Revised 12/06/06 Page 2 E & O COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 02/07/07 02/28/07 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number E&007-10 100) Orange County Sanitation District I;l - Collections �- Facilities FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Jim Herberg, Director of Engineering SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF COLLEGE AVENUE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-47 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a budget increase of $2.844,000 to the budget for Rehabilitation of College Avenue Pump Station. Contract No. 7-47, for a total budget amount of $10.820,000. SUMMARY • This project will rehabilitate College Avenue Pump Station. The rehabilitation includes the design and construction of mechanical, electrical, instrumentation and controls, structural, landscape, and architectural improvements to bring the facility into compliance with the Orange County Sanitation District (Sanitation District) Standards. • A Construction Cost Opinion was prepared by the Consultant and submitted with the Final Design Package. The construction cost is estimated at approximately $7,600,000. An increase to the existing budget is necessary to account for the Consultant's revised cost estimate. • The increase in cost is mainly associated with the demolition of the existing above ground building and the construction of a new above ground building, construction of a new access stair case structure to reach the mechanical room, by-pass pumping activities, additional landscaping, and the structural retrofitting of the dry and wet well structure. • All of the above work was not included in the original Scope of Work (SOW) because the Project Charter assumed that the existing building would be kept, and the wet well by-pass pumping requirements would not be so expensive. Also, the landscaping that is being required by the City of Costa Mesa was not included in the original SOW. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS • August 2004 — Approval of Professional Services Agreement with RBF Consulting for an amount not to exceed $941,576. Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This increase in the project budget complies with authority levels of the Sanitation District's Delegation of Authority. This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 39). The overall program cost is forecast to be under the current budgeted amount even with this requested budget increase. JH:AC:kf:bm:kf H:\dept\agenda\Committees\E&O\E&O 2007\0207\07-10.7-47.doc Page 2 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District WEDNESDAY, February 14, 2007, AT 5:00 P.M. A meeting of the Finance and Administration Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on February 14, 2007, at 5:00 p.m., in the Sanitation District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION STAFF PRESENT: COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Jim Ruth, General Manager DIRECTORS PRESENT: Bob Ghirelli, Assistant General Manager Mark Waldman, Chair Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Phil Luebben, Vice Chair Administrative Services Steven Choi Jeff Reed, Human Resources and Employee Bill Dalton Relations Manager Rich Freschi Mike White, Controller Darryl Miller Lilia Kovac, Committee Secretary Joy Neugebauer Norbert Gaia Chris Norby Bob Geggie Ken Parker Juanita Skillman Jim Winder Doug Davert, Board Vice Chair OTHERS PRESENT: Brad Hogin, General Counsel Shirish Patel DIRECTORS ABSENT: Richard Kikuchi Jon Dumitru Ed Soong Sal Tinajero Don McLean Jim Ferryman, Board Chair (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Waldman did not give a report. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Jim Ruth, General Manager, did not give a report. Minutes of the Finance and Administration Committee February 14, 2007 Page 2 (6) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Administration, did not give a report. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL Brad Hogin, General Counsel, did not give a report. (8) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve minutes of the December 13, 2006 and the January 3, 2007 meetings of the Administration Committee. b. ADM07-01 MOVED, SECONDED,AND DULY CARRIED: Approve change order No. 1 to Purchase Order contract issued to Louis Allen International for Management and Leadership Training services, authorizing an additional $106,765, increasing the total contract amount not to exceed $153,015. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (9) ACTION ITEMS a. ADM07-02 MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to: (1) Direct staff to issue new fixed rate Certificates of Participation (COP) debt sufficient to refund up to $280 million of COP Series 2003; and, (2) Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and enter into a sole source Consultant Services Agreement with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to provide bond counsel and disclosure counsel services in an amount not to exceed $125,000. b. ADM07-03 MOVED, SECONDED,AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve the selection of Alliant Insurance Services, Inc., to serve as Property, Liability, and Workers' Compensation Insurance Broker of Record for a one-year period commencing on March 1, 2007, with the option to renew for an additional four one-year periods at an average commission rate per line of insurance of eight (8) percent. Directors requested a schedule of insurance activities be available prior to policies are renewed. 1 Minutes of the Finance and Administration Committee February 14, 2007 Page 3 C. ADM07-04 MOVED, SECONDED,AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a Purchase Order Contract with Lance, Soll & Lunghard, Certified Public Accountants, renewing the first year of a two-year option for internal auditing services for the period of March 1, 2007 through February 29, 2008 for the amount not to exceed $58,670; and (2) Direct Lance, Soil & Lunghard to perform specific internal auditing assignments as the Finance and Administration Committee deems necessary. An oversight subcommittee with Directors Waldman, Luebben, and Parker will meet with auditors and staff to give direction of focus of audit areas, and will report to the Administration Committee. d. ADM07-05 MOVED, SECONDED, AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve the FY 2007-08 budget assumptions and direct staff to incorporate these parameters in preparing the FY 2007-08 budget update. (10) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in Closed Session at 5:35 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1). Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance and Administration Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Clerk of the Board in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. (11) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY (12) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (13) FUTURE MEETING DATES The next regular Administration Committee meeting is scheduled for March 14, 2007, at 5 p.m. (15) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 5:48 p.m. Submitted by: Lilia Kovac Committee Secretary H:\dept\agenda\FAHR\FAHR2006\1106\110806 draft FAHR Minutes.doc FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 02/14/07 02/28/07 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number ADM07-02 11(b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Administrative Services SUBJECT: REFUND CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION SERIES 2003 UP TO THE TOTAL $280 MILLION OUTSTANDING GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1 . Direct staff to issue new fixed rate Certificates of Participation (COP) debt sufficient to refund up to $280 million of COP Series 2003; and, 2. Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and enter into a sole source Consultant Services Agreement with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to provide bond counsel and disclosure counsel services in an amount not to exceed $125,000. SUMMARY Current long-term tax-exempt interest rates continue to hover around historic lows, providing the Sanitation District with potential refinancing opportunities to reduce interest cost. One opportunity is the economic refunding of the Sanitation District's outstanding COP Series 2003. According to the District's financial advisor, Public Resources Advisory Group (PRAG), many maturities of this issue may be advance refunded for significant economic savings under current market conditions in excess of three (3) percent as the minimum present value savings as required by the Sanitation District's debt policy. Approval of the recommended actions above will direct staff to begin the advanced refunding of part, or all, of the Series 2003 $280 million outstanding fixed-rate debt and retain the bond counsel firm of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to assist in the debt issuance. Staff will continue to work with the financial advisory firm of PRAG. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS In October of 2006, the Board renewed the financial advisory service contract with PRAG for an additional five-year period beginning with fiscal year 2006-07. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The District currently has five series of COPs outstanding comprising a total par amount of $791.0 million. The following table describes each COP in detail. Form No.DW-102-3 Agenda Report-F&A Dept.151 Revised 01/08/07 Page 1 9 EXISTING COP FINANCING PROGRAM Outstanding Interest Rate Par Amount` Mode Series 2006 S200,000.000 Daily Variable Rate Series 2003 280,000,000 Fixed Rate Series 2000 197,400,000 Daily Variable Rate Refunding ") Series 1993 32,200,000 Synthetic Fixed Rate 3) Refunding (2) Series 1992 85,505,000 Synthetic Fixed Rate (3) Refunding (2) Total $795,105,000 *As of January 31, 2007. (1) Series 2000 COPS refunded the Series A. B, and C issued between 1990 and 1992, (2) Series 1992 and 1993 COPs refunded the Series 1986 and a portion of the Series"B-COPs. (3)Variable rate debt swapped to a fixed rate through maturity. The Series 2000 refunded the $179.7 million outstanding principal balance of the 1990-92 Series "A," "B" and "C COPs, and reimbursed the District for improvements made to the wastewater treatment system. The 1993 Refunding COPS were issued to refund $39.7 million of the Series "B" COPS. The Series 1992 Refunding COPS refunded the 1986 COPS ($107 million) issued on behalf of District Nos. 1 , 2, and 3. The 1992 Refunding COPS also refunded approximately $38.4 million of the Series "B" COPS, issued in 1991. The following table displays the combined gross debt service cash flows for the District's five COPS through final maturity in FY 2035-36. The spikes indicate the final payments for various issues and will be paid from the debt service reserves. DEBT SERVICE STRUCTURE 90 80 ■Principal O Interest 70 ,s, 60 c 50 40 30 20 10 0 loll r 006) 0 *- NM Il2 (2 t� 0_26) OZ- cV CMV' to Wr- M 00r NMt7 t.o (p 0 0 0 r N N N N N N N N N N M M Cl) Cl) M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Fiscal Year End Form No.DW 102-3 Agenda Report-F&A Dept.151 Revised:01/08/07 Page 2 Strategy The most recent Strategic Plan capital improvement program requires approximately $2.2 billion over the next 10 years, of which approximately $1.2 billion is to be financed through long-term borrowings in accordance with the District's long-term debt fiscal policy and cash flow projections The next new debt issuance of$300 million of COP debt is not scheduled until fiscal year 2007-08. A total of up to $1.2 billion in COP debt issuance is being proposed over the next ten years with a new issuance scheduled approximately every year for at least the next six years. These financings are needed early in the 10-year capital improvement program because the bulk of the construction is scheduled during the next seven years. Due to the current low interest rate environment, staff is proposing to refund at least $84.0 million of COP Series 2003 maturing in years 2027 through 2030 with annual coupon rates of 5.25 percent, as shown in the chart below. Additional bond maturities may be proposed to be refunded depending on the existing market rates at the time of issuance. COP Series 2003 Maturity Bond Type Principal Amount Coupon Call Date Call Price 02/01/21 Serial $ 4,495,000 5.25% 08/01/13 100.000 02/01/22 Serial 15,100,000 5.00% 08/01/13 100.000 02/01/23 Serial 15,805,000 5.00% 08/01/13 100.000 02/01/24 Serial 16,640,000 5.00% 08/01/13 100.000 02/01/25 Serial 17,425,000 5.00% 08/01/13 100.000 02/01/26 Serial 18,350,000 5.00% 08/01/13 100.000 02/01/27' . Serial 19;265 000 5 25% 0$/01/13 10Q:000 02/01I28 ; ':Serial_ 20235,000 ;. :,. '' 5:25%_ 08/.01/13 �100.000 ;- ,02/01/30'=` Term 44,505,Q00 525% . . _ 08101113`, 1 OD000 02/01/33 Term 108,180,000 5.00% 08/01/13 100.000 Total $280,000,000 Finance Team and Timeline Financial advisory services were obtained in October 2006, for a five-year period. Staff is now proposing that bond counsel services be retained for this refinancing immediately to take advantage of this low interest rate environment. It is requested that the Finance and Administrative Committee authorize staff to engage Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe for this project. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe has provided legal services on various matters related to the District's existing COP financing program, and is therefore, intimately familiar with the legal documents and structures of the District's COP issues. Most recently, they have assisted staff efforts related to the issuance of the COP Series 2006 and COP Series 2003. Costs for legal services would be reimbursed from the proceeds of the new COP upon successful completion of the issuance. Orrick, Form No.DW-102-3 Agenda Report—F&A Dept.151 Revised:0110&07 Page 3 i Herrington & Sutcliffe has also developed a working knowledge of the industry through the completion of similar financings. Given the knowledge and experience that both firms can contribute to the proposed issuance, it is estimated that it can be accomplished in approximately 100 days, as illustrated by the timeline below. Staff would negotiate a professional services agreement Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, for execution by the General Manager. Due to the fact that this is a fixed-rate debt issuance, staff is proposing to issue this debt through a competitive sale because it is the most expeditious way to access the market and it is expected to provide the lowest interest cost for this given structure. ➢ Negotiate professional services agreement with bond counsel ➢ Issue Bank, Printer and Verification Agent Request for February Proposals ➢ March ➢ Select Bank, Printer and Verification Agent ➢ Develop legal documents ➢ Develop disclosure documents(Official Statement) ➢ Develop rating agency presentation April ➢ Conduct rating agency presentations ➢ Finalize debt service and cash flow modeling ➢ Finalize legal and disclosure documents ➢ Conduct Competitive Sale of Fixed Rate COP 2007 May ➢ Execute COP 2007 Refunding issue ➢ Investment of Bond Proceeds ➢ Debt Administration All costs involved in the COP issuance, including costs for Orrick and for PRAG will be paid from the proceeds of the new issue. J R:LT:MW:lc Form No.OW-102-3 Agenda Report—F&A Dept.151 Revised:01/08/07 Page 4 FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 02/14/07 02/28/07 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number t ADM07-03 11 c Orange County Sanitation District FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance and Administrative Services SUBJECT: SELECTION OF INSURANCE BROKER(S) OF RECORD FOR THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S PROPERTY, LIABILITY, AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS AND OTHER COVERAGE SERVICES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve the selection of Alliant Insurance Services, Inc., to serve as Property, Liability, and Workers' Compensation Insurance Broker of Record for a one year period commencing on March 1 , 2007, with the option to renew for an additional four one-year periods at an average commission rate per line of insurance of eight (8) percent. SUMMARY Staff has completed a competitive proposal process to ensure that the Sanitation District receives a high, timely level of property, liability, workers' compensation, and other coverage broker services, at competitive prices. A request for proposal was sent to nineteen (19) large and regional insurance brokerage firms. A total of four (4) firms submitted a proposal. Following the initial review of the proposals, three (3) proposals were deemed responsive and were included in the interview process. Following the interviews of these three (3) firms, the Proposal Review Team determined that Alliant Insurance Services, Inc., the Sanitation District's current broker of record, was the firm that could best demonstrate a high and timely level of services at the best value. Staff is recommending that Alliant Insurance Services be retained as the District's broker of record at an average commission rate per line of insurance of approximately eight (8) percent. This is the same average that was paid during FY 2006-07. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS In December 1996, following a competitive Request for Proposal (RFP) process involving large insurance brokerage firms, the Board selected Robert F. Driver Associates of Newport Beach (now known as Alliant Insurance Services, Inc.) to serve as the Broker of Record for the Sanitation District's insurance coverage needs. In December 2006, the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee authorized staff to conduct a new RFP for Insurance Broker of Record services, to make certain that the District continues to receive competitive professional services on a timely basis. Form No.DW-102-3 Agenda Report—F&A Dept 151 Revised:01108107 Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RFP PROCESS Staff prepared a comprehensive RFP covering property, liability, and workers' compensation programs and other coverage services. The RFP provided all firms with an equal opportunity to submit proposals for these services that were to include quotes for compensation based on a commission based structure and a fee-based structure. On December 22, 2006, the RFP was sent to nineteen (19) large and regional insurance brokerage firms. On January 23, 2007, the Sanitation District received four (4) proposals from the following firms: • Alliant Insurance Services • Aon Risk Services Inc. of Southern California • Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services • Willis Insurance Services of Orange County One of the two largest insurance brokerage firms in the United States, Marsh & McLennan Companies, declined to propose and stated in a letter to the Sanitation District that the insurance programs that the Sanitation District participates in, has consistently been less expensive than what is available in the open commercial market and that pricing realities would likely preclude them from being competitive. RESULTS OF PROPOSAL EVALUATION A Proposal Review Team, consisting of the District's Director of Finance and Administrative Services, Controller, Principal Risk and Insurance Analyst, Principal Accountant, and the Administrative Assistant over Insurance Contracts evaluated the four (4) written proposals. Following the initial review of the proposals, the Proposal Review Team determined that three (3) of these firms, Alliant Insurance Services, Aon Risk Services, Inc., and Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, were responsive as to services provided, experience in servicing public agencies, and demonstrated a willingness to meet the Sanitation District's time lines. and were scheduled for interviews. Following the interviews, Alliant Insurance Services stood apart from the other firms in convincing the Proposal Review Team that, because of their broad base in the public agencies insurance market, they could save the Sanitation District 20 to 25 percent on insurance premiums on each line of insurance at the same coverage amounts and self- insured retentions. Even the other two firms interviewed acknowledged Alliant Insurance Services' purchasing power advantage, and focused instead on other Risk Management services their firms had to offer. Alliant Insurance Services was also committed to keeping the Board of Directors apprised on the current insurance market conditions and providing insurance renewal proposals within the stated deadlines. Form N0.DW-102-3 Agenda Report-F&A Dept.151 Revised 01/08/07 Page 2 CONCLUSIONS Alliant Insurance Services serves more than 1,500 special districts, 56 of the 58 California Counties, over 600 cities, numerous joint power authorities, in excess of 150 school districts, the California State University System, several large transit districts, and the State of California. In addition, they have several unique proprietary programs, such as the Public Entity Property Insurance (PEPIP) and the Alliant National Municipal Liability (ANIMAL). PEPIP has over $170 billion in insured values in more than thirty states, is the largest property insurance program in the world, and offers members leveraged buying power with the additional benefits of flexibility, broader coverage provisions, and lower premium rates of group program purchasing power. Similar to its PEPIP counterpart, ANIMAL was designed to capitalize on the flexibility, broader coverage provisions, and lower premium rates of group program purchasing power. With member premiums approximating $14 million, public agency clients maintain the capability of designing excess liability coverage limits and deductibles specific to individual needs without the necessity of formal membership requirements. The most significant program development in recent years, the California Public Entity Insurance Authority (now CSAC) was formed in 2001 to afford all public agencies in California access to CSAC Enrolled Insurance Authority's insured and self-insured workers' compensation program. Given the disintegration of the 2002 and 2003 workers' compensation marketplace and the ongoing restrictive excess workers compensation insurance environment, Alliant Insurance Services has been able to offer the only meaningful alternative to hundreds of California public agencies. Based on the results of the public bid process, staff recommends retaining Driver Alliant as the District's broker of record. This complies with the authority levels of the Sanitation District's Delegation of Authority. This item has been budgeted. ATTACHMENTS 1. Insurance Schedule JDR:LT:MW:lc Form No.DW-102-3 Agenda Report—F&A Dept.151 Revised:01/08107 Page 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INSURANCE SCHEDULE FY 2006-07 POLICY POLICY ANNUAL SIRIDEDUCTIBLE COVERAGE LIMITS PREMIUM RETENTION Excess Workers' Compenation $200 mil. Each acc./employee $201,746 est_ $500.000 Property Insurance $1 Billion $777,833 $25,000 per occur., $100,000 Flood per occur., No EQ Boiler& Machinery $100 mil. per occur. $25,837 $25,000 per occur. Excess General Liability $25 mil. Blanket Loss $391,233 $250,000 per occurrence and annual aggregate. Pollution Liability $10 mil per occur. $12,966 $100,000 per occur. Watercraft Protection& Indemnity $10 mil per occur. $18,706 $15,000 Commercial Crime $5 milion per loss $4,444 $2,500 Travel and Accident $500,000 per occur. $2,500 None i i FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 02/14/07 02/28/07 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number ADM07-05 11(d Orange County Sanitation District FROM: James D. Ruth, General Manager Originator: Lorenzo Tyner, Director of Finance & Administrative Services SUBJECT: Consideration of Budget Assumptions and Budget Calendar for Preparation of the FY 2007-08 Budget Update. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve the FY 2007-08 budget assumptions and direct staff to incorporate these parameters in preparing the FY 2007-08 budget update. SUMMARY For the budget update process. the F&A Committee establishes the Budget Assumptions and approves the Budget Calendar. Staff will make a brief presentation at the Committee meeting. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS None. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Currently. there are no proposed changes to the District Fiscal Policy. The Fiscal Policy is published in the FY 2006-07 and 2007-08 Budget document (Section 3, Pages 1-14), and is available on the District's website. ATTACHMENTS 1. Preliminary Budget Assumptions Highlights (Page 2) 2. Preliminary Budget Assumptions (Pages 3 — 5) 3. Budget Update Calendar (Pages 6-9) JR:LT:MW:Ic Form No,DW-102.3 Agenda Report-F&A Dept,151 Revised.01/08107 Page 1 FY 2007-08 Preliminary Budget Assumptions Highlights Economic Assumptions ■ Four percent inflation was used for the FY 2007-08 budget. This approximates the updated inflation of three point three percent* that is projected for 2007. *(Chapman University December 2006 Economic and Business Review) Revenue Assumptions ■ The District rate for a single-family residence (SFR) will increase 9.8% to $182.05. ■ Rate adjustment notification is not required as the rates will not exceed the maximum amount possible for the fifth year of the five year rate schedule per the last notification. • Any change in Board direction regarding the SFR rate assumption will be included in the final budget. Note: Each $1 increase in SFR rate will generate approximately S900,000 per year. ■ Property taxes will be budgeted to increase five percent over last year, an approximate increase of $2.7 million. ■ Interest income will be budgeted at four percent of the projected average cash and investment balance for FY 2007-08. Operating Assumptions ■ Average daily flow for FY 2007-08 is estimated to be the same as the FY 2006-07 projection of 250 million gallons per day (mgd). The FY 2005-06 final flow was 234 mgd. ■ All existing secondary treatment facilities will be operated and maintained at full capacity. ■ Interim disinfection facilities will be operated and maintained at existing levels and cost. ■ Operating expenses are expected to approximate the adopted FY 2007-08 budget. Staffing Assumptions ■ Authorized staffing will be no higher than the current authorization of 644.0 FTEs. ■ A 5% vacancy factor has been budgeted for FY 2007-08 for authorized positions. ■ MOUs for OCEA, Local 501, and SPMT are being negotiated for FY 2007-08. No salary or benefit adjustments will be included in the budget. Reserve Assumptions ■ The current reserve policy was reviewed by the District's financial adviser, Public Resources Advisory Group, and the Board during FY 2003-04 with no changes. Debt Financing Assumptions — Certificates of Participates (COP) ■ The District will continue to use COPs as the primary method of financing its capital program. COP funds will only be used for capital expenses. ■ The District will issue COPs of$300 million in FY 2007-08. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Assumptions ■ The FY 2007-08 CIP Cash flow is based on the current Validated CIP. ■ The baseline CIP for FY 2007-08 is $338.8 million. Form No.OW-102-3 Agenda Report-F&A Dept.151 Revised,01/08/07 Page 2 1 a' b FY 2007-08 Preliminary Budget Assumptions Economic Assumptions ■ 4% inflation projection was used for the FY 2007-08 budget. This approximates the updated inflation of 3.3% that is projected for 2007 by the Chapman University December 2006 Economic Forecast Report. Revenue Assumptions ■ Board ratification of Year 5 of the 5 year sewer service user fee rate schedule. ■ Anticipate the Single Family Residence (SFR) rate will increase 9.8% to $182.05. ■ Each $1 increase in SFR rate will generate approximately $900,000 per year. ■ No notification is required for the rate increase as the rates will not exceed 20%, the maximum amount possible for the fifth year of the five year schedule per the last notification. ■ Capital Facilities Capacity Charge (CFCC) only captures "additional growth" infrastructure costs. Existing facility, improved treatment, RRR, and support CIP will be captured through user fees. ■ The rate study completed in May of 2006 adjusted CFCC Fees as a result of escalation of the CIP to mid-point of construction and the lowering of flow projections out to 2020. ■ The rate study and resulting CFCC fee considers the impact from the change in flow projections for SAWPA and IRWD. ■ Permit user rates for flow, BOD, and SS will follow the most recent Rate Study. ■ Use 4,000 EDU connections for each year as that is the average for the past 10 years. ■ Annexation Fees capture both net current assets and equivalent property tax allocations totaling $4,235 per acre. ■ No annexation fees are budgeted for FY 2007-08. Two annexations are anticipated to occur in FY 2007-08, but the Board will be asked to defer the annexation fees until the properties connect to the sewer (approximately 220 total properties). ■ Property taxes will be budgeted to increase 5% over last year. A 5% increase in total assessed value (AV) will generate approximately $2.7 million over the prior year's estimated taxes. ■ The 5% increase is comprised of a 2% AV increase (authorized by the State Constitution) with the remaining increase resulting from AV increases up to market value which are authorized when property is sold at a higher value. ■ Interest income will be budgeted at 4% of the projected average cash and investment balance for FY 2007-08. ■ $300 million COP Debt Issuance is scheduled in order to assist in the funding of the $338.8 million CIP outlay scheduled for FY 2007-08. Form NO.DW-102-3 Agenda Report—F&A Dept.151 Revised:01108/07 Page 3 P FY 2007-08 Preliminary Budget Assumptions Operating Assumptions ■ The District will continue to treat dry weather urban run off up to 4 mgd for free with a 10 mgd maximum. • All existing secondary treatment facilities will be operated and maintained at full capacity. ■ Interim short-term disinfection facilities will continue to be operated and maintained at existing levels and cost. ■ Operating expenses are expected to approximate the adopted FY 2007-08 budget. ■ Average daily flow for FY 2007-08 is projected to be the same as the FY 2006-07 projection of 250 mgd. This is 1 mgd above the Interim Strategic Plan Update projection of 249 mgd for FY 2007-08. The FY 2007-08 projection is 17 mgd higher than the first 6 months this year. FY The 2005-06 final flow was 234 mgd. ■ Authorized Staffing will be no higher than the current authorization of 644.0 FTEs. ■ Minimal additional staffing requests are anticipated for FY 2007-08 and will be approved only to the extent that total FTEs do not exceed 644.0. ■ Vacant positions at 12/31/05 have been projected at 100% of step 4 for FY 2007-08. New positions for FY 2006-07 have been projected at 100% of step 3 for FY 2007-08. ■ A 5% vacancy factor has been budgeted for FY 2007-08 for authorized positions. The actual vacancy factor for FY 2005-06 was approximately 7%. ■ MOUs for OCEA, Local 501, and SPMT are being negotiated for FY 2007-08. ■ No salary adjustments (neither for COLA nor for step increases) will be included in the budget. ■ Benefits will be assumed to be provided at the current level. ■ Employer required OCERS contribution is estimated at a net 19.25% (20.15% was included in the adopted FY 2007-08 budget). The OCSD pickup of 3.5% of the employee's required contribution is budgeted to continue (current level of benefit). ■ Other employee benefits are assumed to increase 10% over the FY 2006-07 projections. ■ Training will continue to be budgeted at 2% of the regular salary budget and will be centralized in Human Resources. ■ The General Manager Contingency will be budgeted at 1% of the total budget for materials and Reappropriations will be budgeted at'/2% of the total budget for materials. ■ Resources for Strategic Initiatives will be included in the budget. ■ The operating budget will include all costs related to collection, treatment, and disposal. Form No.DW-102-3 Agenda Report—F&A Dept.151 Revised:01/08/07 Page 4 � I FY 2007-08 Preliminary Budget Assumptions Reserve Assumptions ■ Year 5 of the 5-year rate plan, currently in Year 4, will be included. ■ The current reserve policy was reviewed by the District's financial adviser, Public Resources Advisory Group, and the Board during FY 2003-04 with no changes. ■ Continue to maintain reserve levels adequate to hedge variable rate COPs. Capital Improvement Program Assumptions ■ The FY 2007-08 CIP Cash flow Budget based on the Validated CIP is still the target. The baseline CIP for FY 2007-08 is $338.8 million. ■ The FY 2007-08 CIP budget will only increase for critical projects which were not previously identified in the Strategic Plan Update. ■ For the first half of FY 2006-07, $118.1 million of the $266.1 million CIP was expended, about 44.4%. Debt Financing ■ Continuation of COP issuances as needed to fund CIP and to maintain necessary reserves. ■ COPs will only be used for the CIP and capital expenses, not for operating expenses. ■ Capital financing plans including fewer borrowings and higher user fees will be considered. ■ Borrowing is proposed only for facilities that are funded by all users (replacement, rehab, improved treatment). Form No.Dw-to23 Agenda Report—FSA Dept.151 Revised:0110&07 Page 5 FY 2007-08 Budget Update Calendar Tasks Responsibility Event/Due Date PHASE I— BUDGET PREPARATION CIP— Call for Projects Issued Engineering 08/29/06 CIP— Project Description/Justification and CLR Forms CIP Budget 09/25/06 Submitted to Engineering Coordinators CIP—Training for FY 2007-08 CIP Business Case Jim Burror Weeks of 9/25/06 Preparation and 10/02/06 CIP— Business Cases Submitted to Engineering CIP Budget 11/06/06 Coordinators CIP— Database, Forms & Instruction Manual Developed CIP Process Team 01/03/07 Preliminary Budget Assumptions Identified. Financial Planning 01/15/07 Preliminary Budget Assumptions Presented to EMT Financial Planning 01/22/07 Draft Budget Calendar Presented to EMT Financial Planning 01/22/07 Preparation for Budget Kickoff/Training Session: Financial Planning 01/26/07 • Develop line item worksheets with the adopted 07/08 budget • Prepare/update budget instruction manual CIP - Budget Preparation Training (CIP Database) Financial Planning As Needed CIP— Review Project Submittals& Make "Go/No Go" Supervisors/ 01/29/07 Recommendations Managers Budget Kickoff/Training Session: Financial Planning 01/31/07 • Distribute budget manual update • Conduct budget training session • Distribute budget worksheets for each division CIP— CIP Database Opened for Input Financial Planning 02/05/07 CIP— Review Project Submittals & Recommendation EMT 02/06/07 CIP— New Project "Go/No Go" Decisions EMT 02/14/07 Budget Assumptions Presented to F &A Finance Department 02/14/07 Mid-Year Financial Report to F &A Finance Department 02/14/07 Operating Divisional Budgets: New Position/Additional Divisional Budget 02/16/07 Employee Decision Packages Due to Financial Planning Coordinators (Julie Matsumoto, Ext. 7564) Operating Divisional Budgets: Equity Adjustment& Divisional Budget 02/16/07 Position Reclassification Decision Packages Due to Coordinators Human Resources (Ann Sullivan, Ext. 7143) Form No.DW-102-3 Agenda Report—F&A Dept 151 Revised:01108107 Page 6 t FY 2007-08 Budget Update Calendar Tasks Responsibility F_�y_ent/Due Date Capital Equipment Budget: Vehicle Capital Equipment Divisional Budget 02/16/07 Decision Packages Due to Fleet Services (Chuck Coordinators Forman, Ext. 7647) Computer Equipment Decision Packages Due to Divisional Budget 02/16/07 Information Technology (Rich Castillon, Ext. 7283) Coordinators Division Budget Update Packages Due to Finance: Divisional Budget 02/23/07 • Proposed operating costs for 2006-07 Coordinators • Operating Budget Expense Detail • Preliminary Contractual Material & Services Form • Capital equipment decision Packages (other than computer and vehicle decision packages which were due on 02/16/07) • New program decision packages Mid-Year Financial Report to Board Finance Department 02/28/07 Complete the Compilation of the Preliminary Division Financial Planning 02/28/07 Budget Update Packages CIP— Project Request with Project Information Entered CIP Budget 03/01/07 in CIP Database Completed Coordinators CIP— Request Review—On-Line Supervisors/ 03/01/07 —03/08/07 Managers & Department Heads CIP— Request Finalization and Division Manager Division Managers 03/09/07 Review Completed CIP— Request Finalization and Department Approval Department Heads 03/12/07 CIP— New Project Numbers Assigned Planning Division 03/12/07 CIP—Completed CIP Budget Delivered to Finance CIP Budget 03/13/07 Coordinators Update to Strategic Initiatives Finalized MT& EMT 3/16/07 • Department Budgets— Update the department text Department Budget 03/16/07 from the Executive Summary: Coordinator o General Manager, pages 19—20 o Finance &Administrative Services, pages 21-26 (consolidate into a 2-page summary) o O&M, pages 27-28 & 33-34 (consolidate into a 2-page summary) o Technical Services, pages 29-30 o Engineering, pages 31-32 Form NO.DW-102-3 Agenda Report—FBA Dept.151 Revised:0110&07 Page 7 r 1 FY 2007-08 Budget Update Calendar TASKS Responsibility Event/Due Date PHASE II-BUDGET REVIEW CIP - Resource Availability Review Engineering & O&M 02/06/07 CIP - Review Workshop Financial Planning & 02/14/07 Department Heads Divisional Budgets - Distribution of Preliminary Line Financial Planning 03/02/07 Item Requested Budget Updates to Department Heads Operating Budget - Budget Review Meetings with Financial Planning & 03/05/07-03/09/07 Finance and Department Representatives Dept Representatives CIP—Committee Review E & O Committee 03/07/07 Operating Budget— Information on Position Upgrades & Human Resources 03/16/07 Reclassifications Submitted to the General Manager Operating Budget—General Manager Review of Budget Financial Planning & 03/19/07— Update Recommendations General Manager 03/23/07 Operating Budget— Presentation of Preliminary Budget Financial Planning 03/26/07 Update by Division/Department to EMT CIP— General Manager and Designee(s)Approval General Manager 03/29/07 CIP—E & O Committee Review of FY 2007-08 Budget Engineering 04/07/07 Operating Budget Update— Overview to F&A Financial Planning 04/11/07 Committee CIP Schedules Through 2020 Completed Financial Planning 04/12/07 CIP - Final CIP Budget Document Preparation and Financial Planning 04/22/07 Incorporation into Final Budget Document Board Holds First Reading of Sewer Service User Fee Board of Directors 04/25/07 Schedule for 2007-08 Operating Budget Update— Overview to Steering Financial Planning 04/25/07 Committee Initial - Proposed Budget Update Finalized Financial Planning 04/26/07 Initial — Proposed 2007-08 Budget Update Presented to CIP— Engineering E & O—05/02/07 Committees Operating— Finance F &A—05/09/07 General Manager's Budget Message Completed General Manager/ 05/02/07 Financial Planning Approval of General Manager's Budget Message General Manager 05/07/07 Final - Proposed Budget Update to Printer Financial Planning 05/09/07 Board Holds Rate Schedule Ordinance Public Hearing Board of Directors 05/23/07 Board Adopts Sewer User Fee Schedule for 2007-08 Board of Directors 05/23/07 Form NO.DW-102-3 Agenda Report—F&A Dept.151 Revised:01108107 Page 8 1 FY 2007-08 Budget Update Calendar Tasks Responsibility EventIll) Date PHASE IV-BUDGET DELIBERATIONS Final Draft- Proposed 2007-08 Budget Update Financial Planning E & O—06/06/07 Presented to Committees F &A—06/13/07 Public Hearing & Board Adoption Board of Directors 06/27/07 PHASE V—DISTRIBUTION OF BUDGET Final line item budget and equipment budgets Financial Planning 07/09/07 distributed to Departments PHASE VI -BUDGET DEBRIEFING Budget Debriefing Financial Planning 07/19/07 • Global changes that occurred in this year's budget. • Changes since the Department's original submittal. • Changes that occurred as a result of Board action. • Results of Budget Survey. • Overview of Budget Monitoring with PeopleSoft Enterprise One Software and review of Budget Coordinator's Responsibility. • Overview of CIP Budget Monitoring. • Suggestions for Budget Process Improvements. Form NO.DW-102-3 Agenda Report—F&A Dept.151 Revised:01/08107 Page 9