The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2005-04-27 ir N ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT April 20, 2005 phone: (714)962-2411 NOTICE OF MEETING fax: (7141 962-0356 www.ocad.com mailingOBo 8127 BOARD OF DIRECTORS PO. Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 92728-8127 street address: 10844 Ellis Avenue Foun Valley, CA tain 08-70118 WEDNESDAY, April 27, 2005 — 7:00 P.M. Member Agencies DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES Cities 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Anaheim Brea Buena Park Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Garden Grove Huntington Beach District will be held at the above location, time and date. Irvine La Habra La Palma Los Alamitos Newport Beach Orange ( ) Placentia Santa Ana Bo d Secretary Seal Beach Stanton Tustin Villa Park Yorba Linda County of Orange OMTS COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 4, 2005 at 5:00 p.m. Sanitary Districts PDC COMMITTEE - Thursday, May 5, 2005 at 5:00 p.m. Costa Mesa Midway City GWR SYSTEM STEERING COMMITTEE - Monday, May 9, 2005 p.m. @OCWD Water Districts Irvine Ranch FAHR COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at 5:00 p.m. STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 25, 2005 at 5:00 p.m. To maintain world-class leadership in wastewater and water resource management. BOARD MEETING DATES Board Meeting May 25, 2005 June 22, 2005 *July 20, 2005 August 24, 2005 September 28, 2005 October 26, 2005 *November 16, 2005 *December 21, 2005 January 25, 2006 February 22, 2006 March 22, 2006 April 26, 2006 *Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month H:ldeptladmin\BS\Agenda12005 Meeting Notices\MN1.2.doc Orange County Sanitation District Advisory BIOSOLID't Committee �ZV SANIrgT/ FILEDINLH ? ORANGF FFICE OF THE SECRETA n STRICTIT F�r�NG rHE ENv`�o�► . _ �.� 2 7rj005 Organics recycling for a better environment. *.--z FINAL REPORT iti Section I. Formation of the Biosolids Advisory Committee...........................1 Section Il Project Plan for BAC..................................................................2 Education Review Vendor Proposals Vendor Proposal Evaluations SectionIII Findings..................................................................................4 �+ Majority Recommendation Alternative View Long-Term Criteria SectionIV Conclusion.............................................................................6 Attachment 1 - Biosolids Advisory Committee Biographies Attachment 2 - BAC Criteria Attachment 3 - Summary of District Selection Criteria +� Attachment 4- Scoring Attachment 5 - Summary of BAC Evaluations Attachment 6 - Summary of Pros and Cons regarding various biosolids proposals "Zi Attachment 7-Alternative Viewpoint Attachment 8 - Long Term: Elements of a Biosolids Solution tow bw Biosolids Advisory Committee Report �Aw One of the final products in the wastewater treatment process is biosolids, the solids component from the treatment process. Historically, this product was discharged to the ocean through the OCSD's ocean outfall sewer line. Over time, the regulatory agencies ,od became more concerned that these biosolids might have environment impacts on the ocean and to the public that use the adjacent beach areas. This caused OCSD, like other wastewater treatment agencies, to end this practice and look for other alternatives. For OCSD, the solution became the trucking of the wet biosolids material to distant locations for composting and land application to enhance the nutrients in soil. In some cases, this product is used in landfills. For the most part, these sites are over 200 miles from the OCSD facilities. The San Joaquin Valley is a recipient of most of the biosolids generated by OCSD. Over the past few years, many of these sites in the San Joaquin Valley have restricted and raised concerns as to the long-term sustainability of this use making it more difficult for the OCSD to plan on the continued use of these many operations. It is expected over time that these restrictions will become more onerous and eventually phase out the ability to continue these operations. As such, it becomes very prudent for the OCSD to now look at other solutions to address biosolids. OCSD generates about 675 tons of wet biosolids per day and is primarily being trucked to many distant locations. Some of the political situations at these locations are becoming less accepting of biosolids and could end viability of OCSD use within the next few years. Some situations are viewed as having longer-term possibilities. Recognizing this situation, OCSD needs to identify other possibilities for using and recycling biosolids. The goal of OCSD's interim effort is to identify a use for 200 tons of biosolids per day thus giving OCSD some diversity and more flexibility in its disposal program. For the long-term, other biosolids possibilities need to be identified. wow Formation of the Biosolids Advisory Committee OCSD identified the need to create a Biosolids Advisory Committee (BAC)to: • examine OCSD's Long-Term Biosolids Management Plan and meaningful input on how to best achieve an interim solution • assist in the review of possible uses of the biosolids • meet the requirements of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to have "meaningful community involvement" in the planning for biosolids, and submit to OCSD's Board of Directors our recommendations as to preferred interim approach to handling biosolids This work was relatively independent of similar efforts by the OCSD staff. The BAC committee was composed of members from various cities in the service area, business persons, economists, environmentalists, public policy experts, technicians, and others wanting to assist. Iwo Page 1 ho bo The first announcement for volunteers to apply came out in early 2003. The committee formation was completed in the summer of 2004. The first meeting of the BAC was held in October 2004 and continued into February, 2005. The BAC generally met weekly in 2 tow hour sessions with some of the January and February meetings lasting longer. Initially, there were 17 members on the BAC representing a diverse group on interests. By the end of the BAC effort, there were 15 members remaining. information on the MW BAC members is provided in Attachment 1. A review of this list clearly shows that the OCSD's objective for diversity was fulfilled. %40 Proiect Plan for BAC The Project Plan for the BAC consisted of four phases—education, review of vendor tow proposals, analysis and consensus building, and report writing with presentation. The first two items will be discussed in this section below and the remainder will follow under a separate heading. Education Since many of the BAC members did not have in-depth knowledge of the biosolids fto issues, the OCSD staff had an educational program to present various methodologies for handling biosolids like various forms of composting and heat drying technologies, along with identifying how the products from these technologies could be recycled for beneficial reuse. The technologies used by other wastewater treatment agencies that "" have similar concerns and issues were discussed at length. Options being utilized included expanding composting option in distant locations while others are looking at newer technology recognizing the likelihood that the distant composting options could be a' restricted/eliminated in the future. The BAC members toured various biosolids operations being used by other wastewater treatment agencies in the area. The BAC members were able to see firsthand the issues and concerns created by these 410 operations especially regarding composting. Review Vendor Proposals Faced with an increasingly complex biosolids management and disposal issue, the OCSD requested proposals from various biosolids and other types of firms to propose on different biosolids solutions that will result in the diversification of OCSD's biosolids products, markets, and vendors. On July 29, a total of five Requests for Proposals (RFP) were issued to those interested in submitting proposals in the following four technology categories: • Biosolids Management for Energy Production • Biosolids Management with thermal Drying for Production of Pellets or Granules (Off-Site and/or On-Site) Biosolids Management using Heat Drying and Soil • Biosolids Management through Manufacture and Marketing of Compost Products Page 2 %EW „W Initial proposals were due on October 26, 2004. A total of nine proposals were received by the District. Five (5) of the nine proposals were then determined by the OCSD staff to be unresponsive to the RFP instructions and thereby eliminated. The four remaining Iwo proposals where evaluated by staff and each was asked to submit their best and final offer (BAFO). One proposal was received in each of the above referenced technology categories and were then summarized by OCSD staff in presentations to the BAC. In aw addition, the executive summaries in the proposals were given to the BAC members for their review and analysis. The four proposers and their technologies are listed below: 40 • EnerTech—Energy Production McCarthy Farms—Compost Production tow • Synagro—Dry Pellets • TPS—Heat Drying with Soil Vendor Proposal Evaluations To assist in the evaluation of the proposals, the BAC, after many meetings and hours of discussion, generated 10 evaluation criteria parameters with weighting factors that are included as Attachment 2. These factors and the weighting criteria were developed .� independently from that of the OCSD staff. The OCSD staff evaluation criteria are included as Attachment 3. bwO With the criteria identified, the BAC members completed a scoring within each criteria for the four proposals to identify a numerical rating score To assist in the evaluation, the OCSD staff provided "life cycle" cost information for each technology which is listed below in order of increasing cost, and included as Attachment 4. • EnerTech--$64 per wet ton • TPS-- $72 per wet ton • McCarthy Farms—$87 per wet ton • Synagro--$100 per wet ton The lowest life cycle cost was for EnerTech. w The individual ratings (points) for each technology were tabulated and presented to the BAC for review. The results of the BAC numeric rating (points) by evaluation factor are summarized below (the higher the points, the better the alternative) and presented on Attachment 5. • Synargro— 349 points • EnerTech-315 points • McCarthy Farms-279 points • TPS-271 points Page 3 The numerical rating system identifies Synagro as the preferred approach followed by EnerTech, McCarthy Farms,and TPS. There was significant discussion of the "pros" and "cons" of each technology to supplement the numerical point rating system. This culminated in the preparation of a list of "pros" and "cons" for each technology. These factors included those identified by the BAC and those identified by consultants to the OCSD. From this lengthy list, a BAC subcommittee was established to prioritize the top four "pros" and "cons" in order of importance with the "'I" being the top factor for each technology for review and comments by the entire BAC. This review occurred, comments made, and list finalized. The list of key factors for each technology is included as Attachment 6. This summarizes the views of the BAC relative to the strengths and weaknesses of the various proposals/technologies. Findings Wd After extensive discussion of the various technologies, identification of"pros" and "cons", a numerical (point) rating system, and much discussion of each, the next step was to fto formulate a possible BAC recommendation to the Board of Directors. Initially the first thought was the Synagro proposal was the logical recommendation from the BAC because it had the largest number of points plus many other factors identified in Wd attachment 6.The BAC then started identifying possible "deal killers" with all of the technologies, raising a possibility that none would be recommended by BAC. As the discussion of the "deal killers" ensued, the BAC started to focus on the "strength" of the "deal killers" along with supplemental information provided by the OCSD staff. As the No discussion continued, positions started to evolve: • The BAC had little desire to recommend the McCarthy composting proposal Ow as it would continue the OCSD's reliance on composting in the San Joaquin Valley that is subject to regulatory restraints, and further reduce our limited diversity in biosolids handling. The BAC was very concerned with always � relying on "out-of-county" sites and this alternative would likely increase that even more. • With respect to the TPS heat soil approach, there was concern with the market for the product, the lack of experience on the part of the proposer relative to biosolids, and again an "out-of-county" site. There was also concern with the lack of responsiveness from TPS when asked for further information relative to their proposal. • All along, the BAC was concerned with exporting all of our biosolids to other areas and not accepting responsibility for an "in-county" option. This concern caused a negative reaction to the significant"out-of-county" locations. Synagro proposal was viewed with significant support because it received the largest number of points in the evaluation, was an "in-county" solution, used a mature technology, greatly reduced trucking and other wastewater agencies are using this approach. There was a concern whether it could be implemented in a timeframe needed by OCSD recognizing the likely Page 4 almi to neighborhood concerns that would require extensive discussion and outreach. There are also concerns with permitting of the technology at the OCSD treatment plant at the specified location, with existing technology both 1W from the extended time to obtain the permits and to never being permitted. Finally, there are concerns with the costs of this proposal. Some members of the BAC questioned whether the facility should be located at the wastewater treatment plant site or some other location in the county. To change location WW and acquire additional property would add considerable time to implementing the technology. There was also the question whether Synagro or OCSD should build the facility. • After reviewing the finalized prioritized list of "pros" and "cons" of the EnerTech proposal, BAC support for the EnerTech project started to grow. The OCSD staff provided additional assurances that the technology will work based on recent inspections and discussion with experts and that the issue with "dioxin" could be addressed in the process. Also, the group thought that the project proposers were technically and financially substantial and thus had the resources to make the process successful. The BAC was further satisfied with the project, as it will likely have participation from other wastewater agencies, support from the City where the project is located, and have gone through the environmental process, making implementation more assured and quicker than the Synagro proposal. Additionally, this proposal is one of the lower cost alternatives. Further, while still "out-of-county", it was a regional solution closer to OCSD than the TPS and McCarthy proposal. Majority Recommendation After extended discussion of the EnerTech proposal, the BAC recommended by a significant margin the following: • OCSD move forward with the EnerTech proposal. • The Board of Directors proceed with the EnerTech proposal subject to a more limited contracting period say upwards of ten years with "off-ramps" should other technologies become more viable for an "in-county" solution • A third condition the BAC feels must be met prior to proceeding with the EnerTech proposal is to attain assurances this technology can be "scaled-up" to handle the amount of biosolids they are proposing. • A fourth condition the BAC feels must be met prior to proceeding with the Uzi EnerTech proposal is to attain assurances that dioxin will not be an issue with this technology. It is also recommended that OCSD immediately proceed with additional technical and 'w environmental review of a non-destructive organic reuse pelletizer-type operation, composting or other technology "in-the-county' either by a vendor or OCSD on the OCSD plant site or another location in Orange County. The OCSD staff will also have 1' time to address local environmental and permitting issues. ow Page 5 wo 490 Alternative View One member recommended going forward with the Synagro proposal as it received the highest number of evaluation points from the BAC, the EnerTech proposal failed to identify a use for biosolids as outlined in the OCSD policies and for other reasons identified in a position paper included as Attachment 7. Long Term Criteria This effort focused on the need for an identification of an interim solution. Over the long- term, it will be necessary for OCSD to focus on a true long term biosolids solution as reflected in Attachment 8. Conclusion We trust the report will be helpful to the Board of Directors in choosing an interim „p biosolids solution. We believe this was an effective process, and the BAC members were able to operate in a cooperative and respectful manner. The members took their responsibility seriously as biosolids will be an on going concern on the part of the OCSD. ", The BAC members were pleased they could make recommendations to the Board of Directors. OCSD staff support managed by Sonja Wassgren made sure the BAC had the M" resources to perform our mission. John Gavares provided effective facilitating to make sure optimal effort was accomplished with the short time constraints at the BAC meetings. Technical staff support and input from Jim Burror, Layne Baroldi, Mike Moore, and Deirdre Hunter made sure we had all of the information and access to their experience in the biosolids field without them trying to advocate a particular position or recommendation on a future course of action. And finally, the OCSD has a well respected, knowledgeable, and professional staff working to solve this difficult problem. Page 6 vow ,fild BIOSOLIDS ADVISORY COMMITTEE BIOGRAPHIES GARRY BROWN Founder and Executive Director of Orange County Coastkeeper, an environmental organization focused primarily on water quality. Garry has a bachelor's degree in Government and extensive training in public administration and environmental sciences. He has served on numerous task forces relative to OCSD going to full-secondary treatment and currently serves on the Ground Water Replenishment System Advisory Committee and the GWRS Scientific Advisory Committee. Garry serves on numerous boards of local and statewide environmental organizations. THOMAS ENGLAND .d Thomas W. England is a retired electrical contractor with a long record of community service. During his 20-year career with Owen Illinois Glass Company, he became a manager in plant maintenance, and studied electrical engineering. He also obtained a „.� contracting license, and started his own company, England Electric. His contracting experience included several years in Saudi Arabia, where he was involved in their rural electrification program, as well as in general construction. .o Upon retiring in 1990, he volunteered with a number of civic groups, including the Center for Mediation, Sister City Association, of which he was president, League of Women Voters and ENACT, a four-county environmental committee. He served on the Citizens Advisory Commission for the City of Garden Grove Sanitation Department, and has a long time interest in infrastructure, water, and waste disposal. DONALD FROELICH Donald Froelich holds a Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in Civil Engineering and Registered Civil Engineer. Don worked in the public water industry at the Metropolitan Water District in planning for 24 years and retired after 13 years as manager of the City of Glendale Water Department. Currently he works part-time at Glendale managing a ground water contamination problem in the San Fernando Valley. RANDY T.FUHRMAN Randy Fuhrman holds a Bachelor of Science in Biochemistry from UCLA, and undertook ow Masters work in Chemistry/Biochemistry; Randy has a Juris Doctorate from Loyola Law School. He has participated in several OCSD citizen activities including, Planning Advisory Committee II (PAC2), Biosolids Environmental Management System (EMS) %Vi certification audit and re-audit, and the Biosolids EMS Steering Team (BEST). JANICE GLAAB Janice Glaab is a 22-year veteran of the California public relations and political scene. `w She has served as a top administrator for the California State Assembly and a top public affairs and media official for Governor Pete Wilson. She is an expert in public relations, communications and media and corporate imaging. 421 EDWARD A. LABAHN Edward Labahn is a retired civil engineer with Bachelor of Science and Master of Science degrees in Civil Engineering, and a master's degree in Public Administration. Mr. Labahn is a Diplomate of the American Association of Environmental Engineers and is registered to practice in California as a Civil Engineer. He was formerly employed by Boyle Engineering and James Montgomery, consulting engineers and, more recently, by the World Bank as a Water Supply engineer assigned to the Bank's East Africa and South Asia projects departments. EDWARD MATTHEWS Edward Matthews holds a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, and a Master of Science in Structures and Mechanics. He is a registered Civil Engineer in California, �+ New York and North Carolina. Edward has over 20 years experience in commercial construction, including sanitary and hydraulic structures pipe and treatment plants. He is a member of the Salton Sea Nutrient TMDL Technical Advisory Committee, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation and California Water Environment Association. PATRICIA(PAT) MCGUIGAN Pat holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Drexel University. She spent several terms serving the residents of Santa Ana as Councilwoman and on the City's Environmental and Transportation Commission (2003-2004.) A former member of the Orange County Sanitation District, she served as Chair of the Operation, Maintenance, and Technical services Committee for nearly 10 years. In addition to her work on the BAC, she is Chair of the Biosolids Committee of the Orange County Waste Management Commission and has been on the commission form 1982 to present. JOHN E. MCNAMARA John McNamara has a Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in Geology and Hydrogeology. He is a State of California Registered Geologist (No. 4863) and Certified Engineering Geologist (No.1725). John is currently employed as a geologist in the field of environmental engineering for twenty years in southern California. Most of his experience is in the solid waste industry including landfills, composting sites (including sewage sludge), transfer stations, recycling facilities and refuse trucking operations. ..; Currently Vice President at Environ Strategy Consultants, Inc. in Irvine and they serve the solid waste, petroleum, and wastewater/ water supply industries. Environ Strategy provides environmental engineering and compliance services to industry and ,wi municipalities throughout California. CHRISTOPHER MILES Christopher Miles holds a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and English from USC. `w He served as a field deputy for a Los Angeles City Councilman. Chris is a current commissioner for the City of Fountain Valley Community Service Commission and member of the Tiburon Home Owners Association. RUSSELL PATTERSON Russ Patterson is a graduate of Cal State Fullerton with Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration. He is the owner of Masonry Contracting Business and a resident of Orange County for forty years. Russ is a member of the Board of Trustees of Connelly High School in Anaheim, past member of OCSD Board of Directors, former Chair of r low PDC Committee, former member of Joint Cooperative Committee of Groundwater Replenishment System and former Mayor and City Council member for the City of Villa Park. DAvID B. Ross David Ross has a Bachelor of Science degree in Business. He is a principal business consultant, immediate past chair of the Orange County Taxpayers Association, Chairman of the Visiting Nurse Association, and former director of the Orange County United Way. +� RONALD SCHLENKER Ron Schlenker is the principal for R.C.S. & Associates, a published author and trainer, and an environmental, safety and health consultant to the industry. He currently serves as vice-president, Treasurer and program co-chair for the Industrial Environmental Coalition of Orange County (IECOC.) He also sits on the County of Orange Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) Health Care Agency Advisory Board and on the City of too Anaheim CUPA. Ron holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Food Science/Enology/Chemistry and MA in Management. .d DONALD SCHULZ Donald Schulz holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Physics from U.C.L.A. He is a professional Electrical Engineer (P.E.) Cal. license no. 8187 (retired). Don is a member 40 National Society of Professional Engineers and a Life Member-Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. Don also completed an Integrated Environmental Science and Technology Training Fellowship at CSUF in 1995. wold Don has served on the following committees: Huntington Beach Investigation Technical Advisory Committee Phase I thru 3, OCSD PAC Committees, SCCWRP microbiological committee, Bight '98, & '03, Surfrider Foundation Environmental Issues Team and is currently an Executive Member, Surfrider Foundation, and Huntington Beach/Seal Beach Chapter. MOY YAHYA Moy Yahya is a Senior Environmental Scientist/Consultant. He has a Master Degree in Science and over 20 years of experience in the fields of Water Quality and Environmental Microbiology. He serves as an active member on several project advisory committees with the Research Foundations of the American Water Works Association and Water Environment Foundation. He has published over 30 scientific �, articles and served as reviewer for the several scientific and technical journals. ,.d OCSD BAC Dec.21,2004 Meeting Summary of Meeting Discussion Notes The topic for the day was development of"weighted decision-making criteria for reviewing the proposals." The following is a summary of decisions and comments: i. Final"Proposal Ranking Criteria" mod Eleven of the twelve members of the BAC supported the following criteria. Ed Labahn did not want to support the criteria, stating that this process deviates from construction project procurement processes/practices. BAC Criteria Weight 1. Technology 25% a. Proven Technology Viability 15% b. Potential for technological advances 10% wow 2. Environmental Impact/Societal Benefits 25% a. Project Siting 15% b. Permitting 10% UO 3. Project Team Capacity 20% a. Financing Capability 10% b. Project Management and credibility 5% c. Project Schedule 5% 4. Economics 15% a. Impact on Rate Payers 10% b. Capital Appreciation Potential 5% ,o, 5. Sustainability/Marketing Plan 15% a. Product Marketing/Good Business Plans 15% ud II. What BAC members like about the "Weighted Proposal Review VV Criteria:" Discussion Notes 1. Having five criteria is better than eight! 2. The sub-components are well-thought-out. 3. Good framework. 1W Ill. Questions, Concerns and Suggestions: Discussion Notes 1. The Criteria of"Project Team Capacity:" a. Consensus within the BAC was that the relative weight for"project team capacity" should be reduced and the relative weight for r" "cost"and "technology" should be increased. b. Recommendations were made to decrease the weight of this "criteria." The thinking was that many of these sub-criteria are "minimal requirements" and will have been met by the time the BAC reviews their proposals. C. One person asked "why give 5 points for morale/ethics," suggesting to make it zero. Recommended that it be reallocated to Financial Capacity. d. The weighting of the sub-criteria "Financial Capacity" was discussed. One person suggested that it be reduced from 10% to 5%, and another person suggested it be increased to 15%. e. The sub-criteria "Project Schedule, milestones and deliverables" .d was discussed. One person suggested that it be reduced from 5% to 0%, and another person stated that"scheduling"was a valuable criteria and should be retained. f. Moy noted that we have to trust what's in the proposals. If the vendor states that they have financial capacity, for example, or have never been convicted of a felony, we'll have to assume that these statements are accurate. Uri 2. The Criteria of"Technology:" aw a. Recommendations were made to increase the "weight" of this criterion. b. Janice compared the "deal breakers" to the sub-criteria under tM, technology. After analysis, the group agreed that these deal breakers were covered. The group felt that the sub-criteria include a) proven and reliable, and b) future viability, and c) Is feasibility and acceptance" is covered under other criteria. 3. The Criteria of"Environmental Impact and Justice/Social Benefits" a. The BAC agreed to alter the title by adding "Societal Benefits" to the title. This terminology is important to some of the directors. b. The BAC agreed to remove the "colon"following "Project Siting." C. Moy suggested that this criterion include language re: the benefits to the community(e.g.jobs are developed, etc.). 4. The criteria of Sustainability/Marketing Plans a. It was recommended that the sub-criteria "Proportion of Capacity Already Filled" be eliminated as a criteria, because, if the vendor can't deliver on this, they should be eliminated. Id 5. The criteria of"Economics/Cost:" .d a. Dave mentioned that at some point, should cost become excessive or prohibitive, it becomes a "deal breaker." The question was posed to staff, and to the BAC as a whole, as to what is the point in which the cost (e.g. impact on rate payers) is prohibitive, and the proposal should not be pursued, despite receiving excellent scores in the other categories. 6. The concept of"Deal Breakers:" a. See the notes above under"The criteria of"Economics/Cost." This +..+ example illustrated the concept of"deal breakers." b. The BAC discussed possible contingencies should such a deal- breaker scenario arise. C. One member stated we should identify "deal makers," as well as deal breakers. 7. The Ability of the BAC to Change the Criteria after Reviewing the Proposals: a. Randy encouraged the group to be clear about their criteria in advance of reviewing the proposals, and not to alter them after reviewing the proposals. b. Others suggested that the BAC can be flexible as to the criteria for Mgt review, and the relative weight of criteria. C. Pat clarified her position re: flexibility, stating that the language describing the sub-criteria under each of the criteria can fit under MW other criteria. 8. One person felt that going from 8 to 5 was great, and perhaps it could %ad be reduced further, from 5 criteria to 3 criteria! IV. Meeting Schedule 0100 1. January 111h- a. District staff will provide executive summaries of the proposals to the BAC, and will provide briefings/overviews of each proposal. b. The BAC will agree upon the process for reviewing and ranking the proposals. 2. January 18`h - The BAC has agreed to make this a 3 to 4-hour meeting 3. January 25th 4. February 2"d 5. February 91h r� Ow tow V. Approaches for Reviewing the Proposals and Drafting a Report Now 1. The group will discuss this on January 11. VI. Revised Language/Descriptions for each Criteria .d VII. Technology 25% ~` 1. Technology Viability: Proven, reliable system, 15% proven redundancy, product quality, potential for Technological advances, cost, and applicability WW to District sites, etc.) 2. Potential for technological advances, cost, and 10% �' applicability to District sites, etc.) Political viability (regulatory/political issues surrounding technology) MW Vill. Environmental Impacts and Justice/Societal Benefits 25% 1�40 1. Addresses several issues, including project siting. 15% Addresses the Social Justice Issue. Addresses odor issues, & public perception issue/local preference issue.) Includes Trucks and Hauling Issues: Significant reduction in trucking. Amount of energy or fuel used for trucking. Covers whether this is the right thing to do. Will this option benefit society; how will it harm society; fairness; equity/equality, etc. 2. Permitting: Addresses political, regulatory issues, 10% and water, air, soil and potential odor issues. Includes Technology's impact on Environment and public health). ,o Includes Potential for Societal Harm and Public Health Effect (e.g. pathogens, spills, etc.) IX. Project Team Capacity 20% 1. Financing Capability 10% 2. Project Experience: Includes Experience of vendor 5% and their technology such as design, construction and operation experience. Also includes health and safety record, non-compliance and criminal and financial disclosure. 3. Project Schedule, milestones and deliverables 5% .a a.+ ..a X. Economics/Total Life Cycle Costs 15% 1. Total Cost: Impact on Rate Payers Relative to 10% Other Proposals. The multiple ways things cost money—energy, transportation, personnel, equipment, time, land acquisition, etc. Includes unit cost to treat, handle and ship. 2. Capital Appreciation: Potential for Capital 5% Appreciation (Covers Energy Costs Over 20 or 30 years). Includes Life Cycle to the ratepayer and taxpayer. Lifetime cost to the ratepayer and tax payer. Potential for OCSD participation in capital appreciation. Benefits for capital or land appreciation to offset costs or part ownership in appreciating assets XI. Sustainability and Marketing Plans 15% 1. Product Marketing, marketing and good business 15% plans, contracts/letters of interest, size of markets, product compatibility, diversity of markets, cost sensitivity, reliable end users etc. This covers Viability of Market: Present and future market for the end product- given all the variables— political, environmental, societal, fiscal, etc.) Summary of District Selection Criteria I. Summary of District's Evaluation Criteria (Phase 2) a. An Analysis of the Risks 40 points b. Total Life Cycle Costs 40 points C. Environmental Concerns 20 points `old II. Summary of OCSD's Nine (9) Criteria (Phase 1) *" Vendor Capacity 35 points a. Criteria 1: Project Experience 10 points �+ b. Criteria 2: Project Team 10 points C. Criteria 3: Financing Capability 7.5 points d. Criteria 4: Project Schedule 7.5 points Also includes design, construction and operation experience. Also includes "insurance capabilities," health and safety record, non-compliance and low criminal and financial disclosure. III. Siting/Location 30 points tw a. Criteria 5: Project Siting 15 points b. Criteria 6: Permitting and Site Viability 15 points No IV. Technology Viability 10 points a. Criteria 7: Technology Viability 10 points '2' (Environment and public health, proven, reliable system, proven redundancy, etc.) Ow Seems to encompass product quality. Documentation from tests that the product is high quality. ,;, V. Product Marketing 15 points a. Criteria 8: Product Marketing, marketing plan, Md contracts/letters of interest, size of markets, product compatibility, cost sensitivity) b. Criteria 9: Proportion of Capacity Already Filled Vendor Proposal Summary as of 1/26/05 Est. Life Contract Total Cost Cycle Vendor Term Tonage (Ton/day) ($/Ton) Hauling Portion Variable Portion Cost ($M * :.:•a��c,:.i`ipa;`yt� ;>�',,q, ,� l'Z„ :.: ....;j�.: �' . McCarthyFamily Fames 10 200 $89 24% 430;0 McCarthyFamily Farms 10 300 $86 24% 41% McCarthy Family Farms 10 1 400 $82 26% 40% McCarthyFamily Farms 10 600 $77 27% 39% McCarthyFamily Farms 20 2C0 $86 24% 44% 87 McCarthyFamily Farms 20 300 $83 25% 42% McCarthyFamily Farms 20 400 $79 27% 42% McCarthyFamily Farms 20 600 $73 29% 42% \,: \�. :'Wl`.ar'�Ys s ti\�\F�v: "c �. 2.,2 •Y'o w> 'Y `> yy} 4ti+\fit. rya ::. - -:-. ;\ -s��6 `:r\o <,.:C��7...�v,\\. � x� ...M`k•Ja�,7\4:i a' OM S na ro Biosolids Cake=18-22% 10 200 $130 0 19% S na ro Biosolids Cake=24-30% 10 200 $117 0 26% S na ro Biosolids Cake=18-22% 20 200 $118 0 27% 100 S na ro Biosolids Cake=24-30% #20 200 $111 0 26% Enertech &20 50 $78 13% 14% Enertech 10&20 100 $74 12% 15% Enertech 10&20 200-800 $69 12% 16% 64 Enertech $10 Million from OCSD 10&20 50 $66 15% 17% Enertech $10 Million from OCSD 10&20 100 $62 15% 18% Enertech $10 Million from OCSD 10&20 200-800 $58 14% 19% \ ._�: 7 •,,y.,}Y::-.., \Cv2;:'. ,?."''<-,h.�:., `�.'i,C > �`i: vero v ..\ - ti:; +..y•Y;+,uii -,_� ..`\\`.`tii�i.�\ - ...�^k'.t `C` .).,,'L.-. ,•+\�.,�::Y'>?.\::: , � ;.\>: �� :vyAq +` .2's:; \ w.: v ��-;, •.�:.� d �}Y•...��..s i <za�z•�, �.\-ec.^>,;:�,�>`z.\��er��'bi.�\aS�E'`i;;,,,>\��s:a� �•�c� �•�,n,.� ... .:.::�\i' �,�.�\�>.�\�';Xi�r��\ �� rw�\�l. -.\��u:�\�:.��:� a�•tt•�..,, a..,. ,..?:. TPS 5 50 $56 32% 100% TPS 10 50 $55 33% 100% TPS 20 50 $53 34% 100% TPS 5 200-400 $48 38% 100% TPS 10 200-400 $45 40% 1 100% TPS 20 1 200-400 $44 41% 100% 72 Attachment 5 Summary Analysis of BAC Evaluations Technology/ Vendor Compost Production Dry Pellots,at plant Energy Production Heat Drying with 2 Soil Evaluation Factor (McCarthy Farms) (Synagro) (Enertech) E-fuel (TPS) Topsoil Viable, reliable, redundant. (36/11)x15=49.1 (49/12)xl5=61.2 (32/12)xl5=40.05 (32/12)xl5=43.65 Potential for advances, cost. (2811 1)xl 0=25.5 (39/12)xlO=32.5 (42/12)xl0=35 (26.5/12)x10=24.1 Siting, social justice. (29111)X15=39.5 (43/12)xl5=53.7 (37/12)xl5=46.2 (29/12)xl5=40.35 Permitting, political, regulatory. (31/1 1)xl 0=282 (36/12)x10=30 (42/12)xl5=35 (25/12)x10=22.7 Financing capability. (35/1 1)xl 0=31.8 (42.5/11)x10=38.6 (39/1 1)xl 0=35.46 (38/1 1)xl 0=34.55 Project experience (38/1 1)x5=1 7.25 (46/12)x5=19.2 (29/12)x5=12.1 (25.5/12)x5=10.62 Project schedule. (3011 1)x5=1 3.6 (31/12)x5=12.9 (31/12)x5=12.9 (23/1 1)x5=10.45 Total cost. (28/11)x10=25.5 (29/12)x 1 0=24.2 (44/12)xl0=36.7 (48.5/12)x 1 0=40.42 Capital appreciation. (17/11)x5=7.75 (41/12)x5=17.1 (27/12)x5=11.25 (24/12)x5=10 Product marketing (30/11)x15=40.8 (47.5/12)xl5=59.4 (40/12)x 1 5=50 (27.5/12)xl5=34.38 Total Average Score 279 348.8 314.7 271.2 Standard Error +/- 10(3.6%) +/-9.5 (2.7%) +/-10 (3.2%) +/-9.1 (3.4%) Rank by no. of votes: 1st. Synagro 3 8 1 2 2nd .EnerTech 1 3 6 2 3rd .McCarthy Farms 3 1 4 4 4th. TPS 4 0 1 4 t, imi SUMMARY OF PROS AND CONS REGARDING VARIOUS BIOSOLIDS PROPOSALS February 9, 2005 MCCARTHY FARMS tEd Pros '=1 1. Far from urban areas, 40 square mile site creates buffer 2. Extensive experience in biosolids management 3. Mature technology, low technological risk bw 4. Market for products on lands owned by McCarthy farms, but not fully defined in proposal • *Permitting seems manageable imb Good management team Cons AMW 1. Could be regulated out of business by counties—high political risk 2. High "life cycle" cost (second highest cost) WW 3. Out-of-county operation, significant trucking 4. Increased reliance on composting in the San Joaquin Valley, reduces diversity in management of biosolids • *Permitting not started, could be difficult '`' • No environmental justice—exporting our problem • High water demand bw *Both a pro and con SYNAGRO MW Pros WW 1. Completes the environmental/biosolids processing cycle at OCSD 2. Extensive experience in biosolids management 3. In-county operation, reduced trucking W, 4. Mature technology, low technological risks • Strong financial capability; finance project construction costs • Market for product including local options out • Creates diversity in OCSD's biosolids management • Addresses environmental justice concerns (local solution) Wed Cons (Synagro con't) 1. Immediately adjacent to housing areas with potential significant environmental issues 2. Highest"life cycle"costs 3. Permitting not started; potentially significant hurdles from multi-agencies 4. Would require extensive local "out reach" program to work (what is the risk cost— °`' minimum — preliminary design, do CEQA documentation — talking about $2 million and 2 years.) Public could kill the project at anytime really.) end • Sensitive to energy cost TPS Pros 1. Second lowest"life cycle" cost 2. Creates diversity in biosolids management 3. Technical process simple • Experience in marketing soil • Construction requirements minimal • Good use of"heat"from another process • Experience in permitting issues relative to soil drying activities • Possibility of"back hauls"to Orange County Cons 1. Little to no experience in biosolids; May not be permitted to handle biosolids 2. Out-of-county option, no local preference, significant trucking 3. Intermittent plant operation 4. Responsiveness of TPS created some concern with OCSD team • Concerned that not all costs included in TPS proposal Uncertain of future sustainability • No environmental justice • Future proximity to urban development ,,,„ • Marketing plan incomplete • Declined to submit"best and final"offer two ENERTECH Pros dMW 1. Lowest"life cycle" cost 2. Regional solution to biosolids; supported by local government 3. Strong financial entities 4. Creates diversity in OCSD's biosolids handling • More local compared to other options • Project team will defined EIR is complete, permitting underway • Excellent/appropriate site for biosolids facility Cons 1. Minimal experience and maturity of the technology—never been scaled up in commercial production 2. Most complex technology compared to others 3. Potential concerns with environmental health (dioxin?) 4. Energy costs intensive • Project contingent on other agency participants • Out-of-county option, no local preference, but closer to Orange County aw eft ALTERNATIVE VIEWPOINT Deal Breakers and Show Stoppers. 1) RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 02-18-A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT IN SUPPORT OF BIOSOLIDS RECYCLING... WHEREAS, the District desires to promote the continuance of the recycling of biosolids to nontable-food crop agriculture land in a manner that is safe, environmentally beneficial, and is sensitive to the needs of the communities involved. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1: "The District declares its full support for the recycling of biosolids. Section 2: `The District will use on its site, and encourage its Member Agencies to use at their facilities, compost made using Districts biosolids" The EnerTech (E-fuel) technology does NOT recycle biosolids, and does not comply with the policy stated in the above referenced resolution. 2) OCSD NPDES Permit No. CA0110604 BIOSOLIDS/SLUDGE REQUIREMENTS: States: 'All biosolids generated by the discharger shall be used or disposed of in compliance with applicable portions of 40 CFR 257, 258, and 503 and any �+ applicable portions of SWRCB Water Quality Order No. 2000-10-DWQ, General Waste Discharge Requirements for the Discharge of Biosolids to Land for use as a Soil Amendment in Agricultural, Silvercultural, Horicultural, and Land Reclamation Activities" And "The discharger is responsible for assuring that all biosolids produced by OCSD's treatment facilities are disposed of in accordance with these rules," EnerTech may have all of their permits in place; however the OCSD NPDES permit does not state that they are permitted to dispose of biosolids by incineration, and this tow responsibility cannot be delegated to a vendor. Because of the restrictions placed upon the OCSD biosolids treatment and disposal LEW program by the above referenced Resolution and NPDES Permit requirements, the EnerTech (E-fuel) proposal cannot be considered a viable biosolids disposal option for OCSD at the present time. kow Any effort by OCSD staff to attempt to revise or amend these restrictions is quite likely to receive opposition from either (or both) the Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQCB) bw and/or the environmental stakeholder community. BAC Vendorrrechnology Evaluation Summary. These are the facts: 1) The Synagro proposal was clearly ranked by those participating in the BAC taw Vendor/Technology Evaluation Analysis as superior to the EnerTech proposal. 2) 8 of the 12 participating BAC members participating in the Vendor Technology WW Evaluation Analysis ranked Synagro as 1st, clearly a majority. Only 3 ranked EnerTech as 1st. 3) The technology evaluation parameters and weighting factors for this Evaluation Analysis were generated by a consensus of all of the BAC members. 4) Both the Staff Viable Technology Ranking Criteria Analysis and the BAC technology evaluation rank Heat Drying-Direct/Indirect (Dry Pellets) as the preferred biosolids technologies. 5) The OCSD staff Viable Technology Ranking Criteria Analysis ranks incineration (EnerTech) 14th out of 25 potential disposal technologies. 6) Disposal of biosolids by incineration is both inconsistent with the Board's stated policy of recycling in order to recover the beneficial nutrient content of class A biosolids, and is not permitted under the terms and conditions of their current NPDES permit. 7) OCSD staff is required to evaluate the vendor's proposals using the numeric criteria described in the RFP, independent of the BAC evaluation. Suggested Recommendations for the Board of Directors Consideration 1) That OCSD contract with Synagro in the preparation of an EIR for the design and construction of an On-Site Pelletizer Dryer at Plant #2, and commence the permit process. 2) Contact McCarthy Farms and TPS, inform them of your decision, and thank them for their proposals. Provide them both with the summary list of CH2M Hill and TETRA TECH inc. comments, and suggest that should they choose to upgrade their facilities accordingly, OCSD would consider future (unsolicited) proposals for review from each of them. 3) In lieu of a contract commitment to EnerTech, OCSD should consider making available to them a low interest construction loan from our reserves. This may help get their proposed facility up and on-line sooner, and provide OCSD with a form of low cost"insurance" in case of a loss of suitable biosolids disposal sites or a change in District policy and permit requirements. 4) Staff should commence a search for alternate construction sites for a Pellitizer Dryer site within Orange County as a back-up to the proposed Plant#2 option. bft �" 5) OCSD should initiate a Federal legislation lobbying effort in order to attempt to reverse the Kern and King's county's pending legislation. %MW 6) Board members should survey their respective Cities and Districts for suitable disposal sites, such as parks, golf courses, greenways or public lands, for application of class A biosolids from OCSD. how 7) OCSD should initiate an aggressive public outreach and education activity, similar to the GRS project, in order to overcome the scientifically groundless and paranoid reluctance of some communities to accept the use and application of class A biosolids to agricultural lands. 8) New major property developments within the County should be required to use class A biosolids only on the community owned portion of the developed project. Opinion of Donald Schulz low Wei LONG TERM Elements of a Biosolids Solution The 2004/5 BAC dealt with finding an interim solution for biosolids, not a true long term biosolids solution. The interim solution must be functional within two years, operate at least five and up to twenty years, and be able to accept 200 wet tons per day of biosolids. The true long term biosolids solution could have a longer start up time, would operate indefinitely, and accept from none to all of the biosolids produced. bod The following are the elements that the BAC believes should be included in the proposals for the Long Term Biosolids solutions. These criteria will be used to evaluate the proposals along with the technical, financial, and other necessary components to ,Ed meet the needs of the district. The evaluation of any long term plan would utilize these elements and be included in the RFPs so the vendors know all the evaluation criteria. „•, The elements or criteria often overlap depending upon one's perspective. For example, viability and sustainability include market, risk, regulation, financial, etc. while another viewpoint uses financial or risk as separate elements completely. `=d The BAC is not suggesting any particular means to accomplish these goals. The vendors will develop their own solutions to meet these criteria. '=W OCSD's Long Term Biosolids Plan should include the following elements: • Beneficial reuse — the more beneficial the better, complete utilization through organic reuse or energy production. • In-county option or, at least, regional operation • Environmentally sensitive—air, water, land,visual blight, road traffic, sound Reduce truck traffic, both number of trucks and distance traveled tow Reduce energy consumption, i.e. electricity, heat, gasoline, etc. • Sustainable over the long term—operational, regulatory, marketability bw Usable product with known long term markets, various markets • Viable—true long term utilization, meets current and future regulations ,ow Can obtain the necessary permits Meets neighbors concerns and neighborhood constraints bow • Diversity—"Not put all our eggs in one basket." • Meets the needs of the community — provides beneficial solution to these needs i3w Fertilizer, energy co-generation, etc • Reasonable cost (remember rate payers pay for this and it will be long term) • Variable amounts of biosolids can be accepted (from none to all produced) Orange County Sanitation District - BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT OPTIONS WHITE PAPER .1 1 � l�• -.W j� SANIT,yj March 16, 2005 Q p Prepared Jointly by: Environmental Assessment Division • Engineering Planning Division FILED IN THE OFFICE OF SECRETARY l�NG THE ENv`Po ORANI;F r'nis,- .. .-•„, nfSTRICT P R 2 7 2005 Summary This report was prepared for the Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) Board of Directors to provide an overview of future biosolids management alternatives. In April 2005 the Board will be asked to make several significant decisions on the future direction of OCSD's biosolids management program. This report along with oral presentations from OCSD staff and the Biosolids Advisory Committee will help the Board understand the many issues related to Biosolids management and facilitate the Board's decision making process. Specifically, this report presents information on the following subject matter: • Overview of wastewater treatment and biosolids production process • Brief history on biosolids management • OCSD's Biosolids Policy and the Environmental Management System for Biosolids • OCSD's current biosolids management program • Regulatory and legislative developments • The Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan • Request for biosolids management proposals a • Biosolids research survey and the Biosolids Advisory Committee Report • Biosolids management alternatives, including potential in-County options • Future Board actions OCSD's Wastewater Treatment and Biosolids Production Process OCSD's regional 650-mile sewer system collects the sewage from businesses and industry in north _ i and central Orange County and carries it to our treatment plants in Fountain Valley and Huntington 1 \ �` !• �`^a Beach. Modern wastewater treatment plants, like Yam. OCSD's facilities, include several operating systems � '` �' ~� j ► _' that work together. The major processes are preliminary treatment, primary treatment, secondary t t , P ry P rY ry '2:."- i treatment, and solids handling• Primary treatment removes solids by settling heavy materials and skimming floating materials. The solids removed during primary treatment are called primary sludge. Secondary treatment removes biodegradable organic - 1 - material through a biological process where bacteria consume the organic material remaining in the wastewater. The clean water and bacteria are then transferred to settling tanks where the bacteria settle to the bottom as a stream called secondary sludge, or waste activated sludge. The treated wastewater is then released through a pipeline located 200 feet on the ocean floor at a distance of over four miles off the coast of Huntington Beach. The sludge is moved to large tanks where it is digested by microbes that produce methane gas in the process. The reduced volume of sludge that is left behind, known as biosolids, is a nutrient rich solid material that is recycled as a soil amendment on farmland. Some of OCSD's biosolids are further processed to produce an earth-like product for commercial and home gardens to improve and maintain fertile soil and stimulate plant growth. OCSD's long-standing Board policy promotes recycling of its biosolids. Brief History of Biosolids Management in the U.S. Biosolids management is one of the most successful environmental operations accomplished in our modern society. A sign of that success is that the average citizen is not aware of what happens after their toilet is flushed. In the days before public wastewater treatment, the management of human waste was an acute societal and public health problem. Now, wastewater treatment represents a silent solution that is considered someone else's responsibility in the public's eyes. The reality is that wastewater treatment remains a societal responsibility that affects every one of us. The challenges faced today by the wastewater treatment agencies serving the public are challenges that affect us all. The term sewage sludge refers to the solid material produced by the wastewater treatment processes. When the sewage sludge is properly treated and acceptable for recycling, it becomes "biosolids." Biosolids are the nutrient-rich organic matter resulting from the treatment of wastewater that can be beneficially used and applied like a fertilizer to improve and maintain productive soils and stimulate plant growth. When beneficially used, biosolids are generally managed in four forms: as a rich moist soil amendment, dried pellet, liquid, or compost. With the advancements in technology, processed biosolids can also be used in a fifth form, as a fuel source. Biosolids can also be managed in landfills when other beneficial use options are not available, accessible, or are too costly. Ja��t�srgT�s Pursuant to requirements contained in the federal Clean Water Act, U.S. EPA published Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage $. ~Z Sludge, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulation, Part 503 (Part Z 503). In Part 503, EPA established three categories of biosolids for regulatory purposes; Class B biosolids, Class A biosolids and g ry FRO Class A Exceptional Quality biosolids. • Class B Biosolids are biosolids that contain low levels of pathogens that rapidly die-off when applied to soils, essentially becoming pathogen free within a short -2- period following application, when Part 503 requirements are followed. This category establishes application site restrictions (e.g., buffer zones) to result in the same level of public health and environmental safety as Class A biosolids. • Class A Biosolids are biosolids that are further processed at the sewage treatment plant and are essentially free of pathogens prior to land application. Restrictions are placed on the amount of metals (e.g., cadmium, zinc) allowed in the biosolids. The metal content requirements under Part 503 are the same for Class A and Class B biosolids. • Class A Exceptional Quality (EQ) are Class A biosolids that meet more stringent metal concentration requirements than Class A and Class B biosolids. Part 503 is a comprehensive, risk-based regulation created to protect human health and the environment from pollutants of concern that are present in biosolids. The rule is based on extensive scientific peer review, and was adopted following an extensive public review process. A recent National Research Council report published in July, 2002 concludes that "there is no documented scientific evidence that Part 503 has failed to protect public health." The report goes on to encourage additional scientific work to address questions raided by the public and academia about the potential for adverse human health effects from exposure to biosolids. The beneficial use of biosolids is a national policy articulated by the US Congress when it banned ocean disposal of biosolids more than 30 years ago. Last year, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) adopted statewide policy reaffirming and encouraging the beneficial use of biosolids. The SWRCB regulates land application of biosolids through a General Order. The Regional Water Quality Control Boards use the General Order or issue site-specific local permits to exercise control over biosolids uses. Biosolids are regulated, and in some cases banned, at the local level via county CountyBiosolids Ordinances ordinances. Stringent local requirements I are the largest challenge to OCSD's existing biosolids management program. Although - OCSD utilizes several biosolids management options, some are not sustainable over the �--- long term due to existing or anticipated J. ;t. Actual Ban -�- restrictive local ordinances. MIPractical Ban Restricted Use—Class A Reasonable Public health and nuisance concerns related V11111,Developing I Implementing Restrictions to the land application of Class B biosolids None are driving the promulgation of restrictive ordinances. Specific concerns cited by the general public and local officials include the presence of pathogens, heavy metals, other chemical constituents in biosolids, and odors in areas where land application occurs. - 3- • Pathogens: Biosolids undergo a process to significantly reduce pathogens during wastewater treatment. The resulting pathogen levels are often below those found in animal manures. Operational controls are required at the land application site under the Part 503 Rule to minimize the potential for human and animal contact until environmental factors (e.g., sunlight) further reduce pathogen levels. Scientific studies show that Part 503 requirements protective of the health of not only those performing land application but the public living adjacent to the sites as well. • Metals: Although trace metals are present in biosolids, numerous studies find average metal concentrations in biosolids are well below the most stringent standards set forth in Part 503. They are often less than those found in many commonly used commercial fertilizers. • Other Chemical Constituents: OCSD's source control program controls the entry of many chemical constituents into the wastewater stream. Two groups of organic � chemical compounds that are of public concern are polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dioxins. Recent EPA studies and risk assessments find these groups of chemicals present in biosolids generally at levels similar to environmental background levels. • Odors: Class B biosolids and some Class A biosolids can create unpleasant odors if not properly handled during the land application process. These odors typically abate after the initial application is complete. To date, numerous scientific studies show no correlation between the odors and negative health impacts. Brief History of OCSD's Biosolids Management Program From 1979 to 1981, OCSD operated an air drying/composting site at Coyote Canyon Landfill (operated by the County of Orange). The biosolids were dried and composted to the required 50% solids content prior to being blended with municipal solid waste before landfilling. During much of the 1980s, OCSD trucked biosolids to the Coyote Canyon Landfill and the BKK Landfill in West Covina. In 1988, new recycling initiatives were undertaken using three separate contractors. Two agreements were made with compost contractors, and one with an agricultural fertilizer contractor. Using these options, OCSD beneficially reused approximately 50% of its biosolids from 1988 through October 1991. From November 1991 through today, OCSD is meeting the goal of 100 percent beneficial reuse of its biosolids. This is accomplished through land application of Class B biosolids in California, Arizona and Nevada, conversion to Class A biosolids through composting in California and Arizona, and conversion to Class A biosolids through lime addition in Kern County, California. OCSD's Biosolids Policy (Resolution NO. OCSD 02-18) and the Environmental Management System for Biosolids (Certified July, 2003) The current OCSD Biosolids Management Policy is as follows: -4- • Maintain a diverse biosolids management program . " including the application to nontable-food crop agricultural land in Southern California and Arizona. • Promote the continuance of biosolids recycling for nontable-food crop agricultural land in a manner that is safe, environmentally beneficial, and sensitive 't to the needs of all affected communities. • Implement the National Biosolids Partnership's Code of Good Practice as a basis for an ,. Environmental Management System for its biosolids management program. • Implement biosolids reuse using a diverse market program with the maintenance of failsafe, or backup options. OCSD follows the best management practices promulgated by the California Water Environment Association and the Code of Good Practice of the National Biosolids Partnership (NBP), an alliance among the Environmental Protection Agency, Water Environment Federation, and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies. OCSD is the first agency in the nation to be certified under the NBP's Environmental Management System program (EMS). The EMS is the nationally recognized industry standard for best practices for biosolids management. OCSD's Current Biosolids Management Program OCSD produces 650 tons of Class B biosolids per day, or 240,000 tons per year. With the increase in secondary treatment, OCSD's biosolids production is projected to reach approximately 850 tons per day or 310,000 tons per year by the year 2020. OCSD's biosolids are currently managed by three contractors: Land application of Class A lime-stabilized biosolids in Kern County and Kings County, California by Tule Ranch, Land application of Class B biosolids in Yuma and Maricopa counties, Arizona by Synagro and Tule Ranch, Composting of Class B biosolids in Riverside County, California and La Paz County Arizona by Synagro, and Usage of Class B biosolids as alternative daily cover material at two landfills in Yuma County, Arizona by California Soil Products and Tule Ranch. -5 - Figure 1 : OCSD's Current Biosolids Management Costs Contract Est. Tons Management Cost per Processing C Estimated ompany End per Year' Option Ton Annual Location Cost Class B land app. $37.62 Maricopa Co., AZ Synagro 7/2005 94,000 Class A compost $38.50 $3,807'0002 Corona, CA Class A compost $45.50 La Paz Co., AZ Class A compost $49.00' Kern Co., CA CA Soil Class B landfill $39.84 4 Yuma Co., AZ Products 3/2007 26,000 Class B land a $37.75 $1,036,000' Yuma Co., AZ Yakima 112012 0 Landfill cover S36.00 SO La Paz Co., AZ Class B land app. S39.75 Yuma Co., AZ Tule Class A stabilized $38.00 6 Kern County Ranch 1/2006 120,000 Class A stabilized S36.00 54,620,000 Kings County Class B landfill S39.75 Yuma Co., AZ Based on 240,000 tons of biosolids produced per year (2004). Tonnage allocations are expected to vary due to factors including inclement weather, material management issues, and regulatory developments. _ 2 Estimated annual cost based on a blended average cost of $40.50 per ton. 3 Option not anticipated being available until mid-2006. A Currently utilizing only the landfill option in order not to over burden the land application options in AZ. 5 Currently not utilizing this option due to regulatory and La Paz Co., AZ v. Yakima litigation concerns. 6 Estimated annual cost based on a blended average cost of $38.50 per ton. Figure 2: Biosolids Management Locations 35% (65 trucks/week) Class A Product: Farmland Lime-Stabilized Vendor: Tule Ranch - Locations: Kings County. CA Kern County, CA NV tj AZ 0% (temporarily) CA Class B Product: Farmland-Fertilizing Vendor: Synagro Location: Maricopa County,AZ 26% (50-60 trucks/week) Class A Product: Compost Vendor: Synagro Locations: La Paz County,AZ' ocso 0 Riverside County,CA 1 22% (40 trucks/week) 'La Paz County currently taking extra loads due to wot Class B Product: Farmland-Fertilizing tields and equipment issues in Maricopa County AZ Vendor: Tule Ranch Location:Yuma County,AZ 11% (20 trucks/week) 6% (10 trucks/week) Class B Product: Landfill & Landfill Cover Class B Product: Landfill Vendor: California Soil Vendor: Tule Ranch Location: Yuma County,AZ Location:Yuma County.AZ —6— Figure 3: Annual Biosolids Tonnage and Management Costs (1988 — 2004) Annual Tons of Cost$ Millions Biosolids S10 M 300,000 $9 M SII M 250,000 S'h1 BIOSOIIUb (tons) _jV 200,000 S6 M S5 M Annual Cost 150,000 S4 M 100,000 S3 M S2 M 50,000 S1 M SO M 0 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Legislative and Regulatory Developments On February 22, 2005, State Senator Dean Florez (D-Fresno) introduced SB 926. This bill would require each local public agency to beneficially reuse at least 75% of its biosolids by January 1 , 2010. SB 926 would prohibit an agency from exporting its biosolids to another, but would authorize the appropriate regional water quality control board to grant an exception to that prohibition if certain requirements are met. As previously mentioned, counties throughout California and Arizona have in place or are developing local ordinances that restrict or ban the land application of Class B biosolids and some forms of Class A biosolids. These restrictive local ordinances work to limit OCSD's biosolids management options. As shown in Figure 4, sustainable beneficial reuse options of sufficient capacity to meet OCSD's needs are rapidly dwindling. Staff estimates that 70% of our current beneficial reuse capacity can be counted on after 2007. - 7- No Figure 4: Estimated Sustainability of OCSD's Current Biosolids Management Program .r Company Management Cost per Sustainability Concerns Longevity Capacity Option/Location Wet Ton Est. Yrs. � Public/Political Perception Class B land app, $37.62 Maricopa Co., AZ • Large volume of CA 2 100 biosolids Class A compost, $38.50 • CUP validity (2008) Synagro Corona, CA . Odor potential 3 10 tooClass A compost, $45.50 • Public/Political Perception Indefinite 30 La Paz Co., AZ • Product marketing Class A compost, • Yet to be built (mid-2006) Kern Co., CA $49.00 . Kern County Politics Indefinite 40* Class B land app, • Public/Political Perception CA Soil Yuma Co., AZ $37.75 • Large volume of CA 2 100 Products biosolids Class B landfill, $39.84 Not true "beneficial reuse" Indefinite 45 Yuma Co., AZ unless used as cover OngYakima Landfill cover, $36.00 Litigation with La Paz Co. Indefinite 100 La Paz Co., AZ • AZ regulatory compliance Class B land app, $39.75 • Public/Political Perception M' Yuma Co., AZ • Large volume of CA 2 100 biosolids Class A stabilized, $38.00 • Kern Water Agency— aw Tule Ranch Kern Co., CA MWD—Sen. Florez leg. 3 35 • Not a biosolids"product" Class A stabilized, 00 • Compost only in 2006 1 30 Kings Co., CA $36. • Not a biosolids"product" Class B landfill, 75 • Not true "beneficial reuse" Indefinite Yuma Co., AZ $39. unless used as cover 15 OCSD has a contract with Synagro to compost 200 tons of biosolids per day.As designed,this facility will have the capacity to manage 325 tons per day of OCSD's biosolids.This excess capacity may not be available for long. The facility can be expanded to manage 100%of OCSD's biosolids production. Stemming in large part from the restrictive ordinances now in place in Kern and Kings Counties, OCSD's biosolids management costs have risen from an average of $20 per ton in 1999 to $40 per ton in 2005, with one existing management option being as high as $45.50 per ton. Other wastewater agencies are seeing their management costs go higher as well, as shown in Figure 5. —8— Figure 5: Comparison of Nine Other Biosolids Compost/DrVing Class A Product Projects Agency Technology Location Facility Status Start Cost per Date Wet Ton LACSD — In-vessel ASP' Rancho . Permitted & designed 2006 S70+ IEUA Compost Cucamonga • Under construction Sacramento Dryer Sacramento • Operational Regional Pellitizer WWTP 2004 $128 Las In-vessel Malibu • Operational 1995 $145 Vir enes Compost Encina Dryer Encina • Permitted & designed 2005 S74 Pelletizer . Out to bid Corona Dryer Corona • Under construction 2005 $52 Pelletizer . Waste heat available Santa Rosa In-vessel Santa Rosa • Operational 1996 $90 Compost LACSD Open-air ASP' Kings County • In permitting process 2007 $70+ Westlake Composting • Pending litigation Synagro Open-air ASP' y • Permitted & designed 2006 $49 SKIC Com ostin Kern Count Ma SOCWA- In-vessel ASP' PDL Landfill ' Conceptual feasibility 2009 $70+ OCSD Com ost ASP = Aerated Static Pile composting using an amortization period of 20 years and a 5%cost of money. Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan In December 2003, the Board of Directors adopted a Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan (LRBMP) that describes a sustainable, publicly acceptable, environmentally-sound, and economical management program for the next 10 to 15 years. Specifically, the LRBMP recommended five actions: • Employ new in-plant technologies to reduce the volume of biosolids handled by OCSD's two treatment plants, • Move to the production of Class A biosolids products using established and reliable technologies, �= > • Establish and maintain failsafe backup options for 100% of the biosolids produced at OCSD, • Work with member agencies and local stakeholders to develop in-county production facilities and markets, and - 9- am • Move into the following markets using vendor contracts for providing processing facilities, product distribution, and marketing: • Energy and fuel production • Heat dried granular products • Heat drying with soil reclamation aft • Compost The LRBMP recommends using "merchant facilities" (private vendors) in the short-term .� to bridge the gap between the imminent phase-out of existing beneficial use alternatives and the implementation of OCSD-owned local facilities. It is estimated that OCSD- owned facilities could take eight to ten years to site, permit, design, and construct. The plan recommends OCSD utilize existing contractors to create Class A compost products and to seek new contracts by a Request for Proposal (RFP) process. The first goal was accomplished by amending Synagro's existing contract to include OCSD participation in Synagro's South Kern Industrial Center (SKIC) composting project. The Board of Directors approved the contract amendment at a cost of$49 per ton plus CPI increases for a minimum of 200 tons per day for 10 years. low The LRBMP identifies several viable "merchant" facilities that are in a position to implement new biosolids management options in the short-term. These merchant facilities depend on agencies like OCSD committing a significant portion of their biosolids production for a minimum of 10 years. In some cases, commitments to new regional merchant facilities may need to extend beyond the 10- to 12-year "' period preferred in the LRBMP to make those facilities economically viable. Request for Proposal Process Based on the recommendations from the LRBMP, OCSD released five RFPs to obtain biosolids management services for the next ten years. Each RFP solicited proposals for managing a portion (200 tons/day) of OCSD's biosolids through a different technology. Staff was looking for one or more vendors to propose solutions that comply with our policy and provide the needed biosolids processing capacities in a timely and cost-effective manner utilizing one of the following technologies: taw • Energy production • Off-site thermal drying for production of pellets or granules • On-site thermal drying for production of pellets or granules • Heat drying with processes soil • Manufacture and marketing of compost products The RFP process started in July 2004 and ended in January 2005. OCSD received nine proposals, with at least one proposal for each technology. Five of the nine proposals lacked mandatory elements found in the RFP instructions and were rejected as non-responsive: — 10— • Liberty Ranch, Inc. / McCarthy Family Farms — Power Production • Biosolids, Inc. — Offsite Dryer Chaparral Farms — Class B Land Application - _ • American Biotech, Inc. — Composting Solids Solutions, Inc. — Onsite Dryer _ The four remaining viable proposals were: • Synagro, Inc. —Onsite Dryer • McCarthy Family Farms, Inc. — Composting • EnerTech, Inc. — Energy (char fuel production) • TPS, Inc. — Heat drying with fuel-contaminated soil OCSD's RFP evaluation process for these four viable proposals consisted of a two-step selection process. First, staff and consultants (Project Team) evaluated the proposals �- for each of the four technologies separately and selected the proposal which represented the "best value" for each technology. A consensus score from the Project Team was determined for each of eight evaluation factors: • Project experience, • Project team, • Financial capabilities, • Project schedule, • Project siting, • Permitting and site viability, • Technology viability, and • Product marketing. Next, Phase 2 of the RFP evaluation process evaluated and produced a score for the "best value" proposal for each technology category. This would allow the different technologies to be compared to produce the best solution(s) for OCSD's Biosolids Management Program. The Phase 2 rating was based on the following factors: • An analysis of the risks, • Total life cycle cost, and • Environmental concerns and impact. Three objectives were accomplished by utilizing this complex procurement process: (1) select the most appropriate vendors based on the LRBMP recommendations; (2) an exemplary RFP process based on "fair and open" competition; and, (3) withstand public scrutiny and legal challenges in the courts. Contracts resulting from the RFP process are expected be awarded at the April 27, 2005 OCSD Board of Directors meeting. - 11 - too Public Input: 2003 Biosolids Opinion Research Poll Conducted by Porter Novelli and the Biosolids Advisory Committee (BAC) In mid-2003, OCSD convened four focus groups consisting of 42 participants to gauge '~ Orange County's residents' knowledge of biosolids. Most residents are unfamiliar with the term "biosolids" and are almost completely unaware how OCSD manages its biosolids. After hearing about the process of biosolids recycling and the opportunity to recycle biosolids within the County, residents are likely to be open-minded about the technology and supportive of the county taking responsibility to manage its waste. Specifically, the study revealed that residents are most concerned about the safety `d of biosolids recycling and rely on scientific evidence, academic research and examples of places where the technology is successful as a condition for approval. Among the options presented for biosolids recycling in the County, residents favor composting the most because they view it as a natural and environmentally-friendly M, process. The study showed that the "Not in My Backyard" (NIMBY) effect is likely to occur among those residents living close to where a biosolids recycling facility is located, but it appears that a strong, proactive education and information campaign ON may ease the fears and concerns of most residents about the issues of safety, odor, trucking impacts and air quality. Not surprisingly, arguments against biosolids recycling that focus on the dangers of biosolids to human health will instill fear in some residents 6:0 and reinforce their doubts and concerns about the potential harmful effects of recycling human waste. WW Cost and impacts on the environment were found to be the top concerns. The top supporting messages for the management of OCSD's biosolids in Orange County are "research shows it is safe to use biosolids for fertilizer or compost" and "it is important that Orange County take care of its own biosolids." The top opposition messages are the need for a precautionary, go slow approach and concerns about odors. In general, the study stated that the "slate of supporting messages is stronger over all than the slate of opposition messages." A Biosolids Advisory Committee (BAC) was created in September 2004 to inform �+ interested residents and stakeholders about OCSD's biosolids management program and to obtain public input on how to best implement the recommendations contained in the LRBMP. BAC members were selected through an application process based on qualifications such as geographic representation, expertise and group representation. Members of the BAC represented homeowner groups, business interests, environmental organizations, public policy experts, economists and technical professionals. The BAC is an advisory group to the Board of Directors and will provide their report and recommendations to the Board at the March 16 Biosolids Workshop. Short- and Long-Term Biosolids Management Alternatives As a part of the Biosolids Workshop, staff will provide information to the Board on both the short-and long-term options available to manage OCSD's biosolids. The short-term options are meant to fill the gap for the management of biosolids over the next 10 years. —12— Figure 6: Short-Term Option 1: Contract for a New Option(s) Pursuant to the RFP Process (650 Tons) Contractor Tons and Est. Technology Location Availability per day Cost/Ton EnerTech (RFP) 200—30% $70 Fuel Char Rialto, CA 2007 S na ro- SKIC 200 —30% $49 ASP Compost Kern Co., CA June - 06 S na ro-AZ Soils 30 —5% $46 Compost La Paz Co., AZ In Operation S na ro $40 Land A B Marico a Co., AZ In Operation Tule Ranch 130—20% $38 Lime Addition Kern/Kings, CA In Operation Tule Ranch 30—5% $40 Land A B Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Tule Ranch $40 Landfill/ADC Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Ca Soil Products 60— 10% $40 Landfill/ADC Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Ca Soil Products $40 Land A B Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Estimated daily cost$33,720, annual cost$12,307,800 • Pros of Short-Term Option 1: o Adds a sustainable non-agricultural biosolids management option (fuel) .. o Supports the development of a regional biosolids management facility within our watershed for southern Californian municipalities o Residual ash from biosolids fuel combustion becomes part of the cement VOW product, no residual waste liability o Diversifies sustainable beneficial reuse options for OCSD o No capital risk to OCSD if the Enertech facility development is unsuccessful blo o Maintains at least one active failsafe landfill option • Cons of Short-Term Option 1: 016 o EnerTech approximately $20 per ton more than the next highest alternative o EnerTech technology not proven with biosolids at full scale o Energy intensive process U09i o Minimum 10-year commitment for 200 tons of biosolids per day to both SKIC and Enertech may conflict with the feasibility of an OCSD-owned in- County biosolids management facility unless capacity assignment imw provisions are made Fi-gure 7: Short-Term Option 2: Manage with Existing Contracts (650 Tons) Contractor Tons and Est. Technology Location Availability per day Cost/Ton S na ro- SKIC 200—30% $49 ASP Compost Kern Co., CA June—06 S na ro-AZ Soils 60— 10% $46 Compost La Paz Co., AZ In Operation S na ro $40 Land A B Marico a Co., AZ In Operation Tule Ranch 200— 30% $38 Lime Addition Kern/Kings, CA In Operation Tule Ranch 60— 10% $40 Land A B Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Tule Ranch 60— 10% $40 Landfill/ADC Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Ca Soil Products 60— 10% $40 Landfill/ADC Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Ca Soil Products $40 Land A B Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Estimated daily cost$27,360, annual cost$9,986,400 — 13— • Pros of Short-Term Option 2: o Maintains "low cost" of the biosolids management program o Additional capacity can be obtained at SKIC o Does not interfere with the ability to commit a larger volume of biosolids to in-County, OCSD-owned long-term biosolids processing facilities o Maintains two active failsafe landfill options • Cons of Short-Term Option 2: o High risk of lack of sustainability of the existing beneficial use options o Depends on land filling and the potential for volatile tipping fees o Reliance on distant biosolids management sites expose OCSD to potential cost increases if diesel prices increase o Dependence on the stability of out-of-state regulatory developments During the implementation of either of the short-term options, OCSD staff will: too • Continue to utilize Class B biosolids land application sites in Arizona as long as this option is viable and pending the development of SKIC, • Explore Class A biosolids composting options at Tule Ranch (Kings County), and • If an in-County biosolids management option becomes available, contracts allowing, provide a tonnage preference to an in-County facility. The two potential long-term options proposed by staff are based on the production of 850 tons of biosolids per day (the anticipated OCSD biosolids production in 2020). The approximate anticipated costs for each of the long-term options in 2005 dollars are: Figure 8: Long-Term Option 1: Develop New In-County Long-Range Options (850 Tons) Contractor Tons and Est. Technology Location Availability per day Cost/Ton OCSD-Owned 300-35% $80+ ASP Compost "Great Park" 2015 OCS13-50%Owned 50-6% $70+ ASP Compost Prima D. 2010 EnerTech 200—23.5% $70 Fuel Char Rialto, CA 2007 S na ro - SKIC 200—23.5% $49 ASP Compost Kern Co., CA June- 06 S na ro- AZ Soils 50— 6% $46 Compost La Paz Co., AZ In Operation Tule Ranch 50— 6% $38 Lime Addition Kern/Kings, CA In Operation Tule Ranch $40 Landfill/ADC Yuma Co., AZ I In Operation Ca Soil Products $40 Landfill/ADC Yuma Co., AZ I In O eration bow Estimated daily cost$55,500, annual cost$20,260,000 • Pros of Long-Term Option 1: o Adds sustainability to the biosolids management program o In-County control of operations addresses the public perception problem of exporting biosolids for management o Significant decrease in transportation-related impacts o In-County product reuse opportunities expanded - 14- "' • Cons of Long-Term Option 1: o Potential for increased cost law o Initial capital investment by OCSD o Financial risk of regulatory developments hindering or prohibiting the use of biosolids-based compost shifted to OCSD o Siting and permitting issues and requirements Figure 9: Long-Term Option 2: Maintain the Selected Short-Term Options (850 Tons) Contractor Tons and Est. Technology Location Availability per day Cost/Ton EnerTech $70 Fuel Char Rialto, CA 2007 S na ro - SKIC 300—35% $49 ASP Compost Kern Co., CA June - 06 S na ro -AZ Soils 50 —5% $46 Compost La Paz Co., AZ In Operation S na ro $40 Land A B Marico a Co., AZ In Operation Tule Ranch $38 Lime Addition Kern/Kings, CA In Operation Tule Ranch $40 Land A B Yuma Co., AZ In Operation —' Tule Ranch 250—30% $40 Landfill/ADC Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Ca Soil Products 250—30% $40 Landfill/ADC Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Ca Soil Products $40 Land A B Yuma Co., AZ I In Operation Estimated daily cost$37,000, annual cost$13,500,000 • Pros of Long-Term Option 2: o Potential for a lower biosolids management cost utilizing existing options o Eliminates the use of OCSD's funds for capital improvements • Cons of Long-Term Option 2: o Majority of biosolids may be landfilled which is not considered by most to be a beneficial reuse option o Depends on land filling and the potential for volatile tipping fees o Landfill capacity may not be available o All biosolids exported out-of-County o Transportation-related costs and environmental impacts Use as alternative daily landfill cover and disposal of biosolids will continue to be important biosolids management options for OCSD because of the pressures on land application from more stringent regulations, declining public acceptance and rising costs of Class A biosolids production. In many cases, landfill operators welcome the landfilling of biosolids because biosolids take up minimal landfill space and provide liquids, which further the decomposition process that is integral to landfill operations. In addition, biosolids result in greater gas production and better quality leachate. — 15— a.. Past Board Actions 1. April 2004 OMTS/Board: Approve Amendment Number 7 to the Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of OCSD's Biosolids with Synagro West, Inc. (Synagro), providing a contract extension from 6/30/04 to 6/30/14 with two additional five-year extensions. 2. March 2004 OMTS: Seek recommendation regarding the process to utilize the biosolids management option implementation process. ■d 3. December 2003 OMTS: Receive and file Final Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7 dated November 2003 and prepared by CH2M Hill, Inc. 4. November 2003 OMTS/PDC: Informational item only regarding existing policies and potential future reuse costs outlined in the Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan. 5. October 2003 OMTS/PDC: Informational item only regarding the various in-plant treatment optimization options evaluated in the Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan. 6. September 2003 OMTS/PDC: Informational item only regarding the biosolids product markets and product technologies. law H:\dept\ts\620\baroldil\Biosolids Board Workshop 3-9-05-LB(6).doc MAN aw -1fi- Orange County Sanitation District Board Meeting Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System Program Update April 27, 2005 Groundwater , ,,,. Replenishment System Orange County Sanitation District Board Meeting Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System Program Update April 27, 2005 Groundwater _ Replenishment System Our History in Water Reclamation OCSD - Wastewater Collection, Treatment and Disposal OCWD - Manage and Protect the Orange County Groundwater Basin First Partnership in 1972 for Wastewater Reclamation OCSD OCWD SecondarySource Control Primary Sewage "" " Reuse 0 GWR System Project Objectives • Improve groundwater quality • Provide a new sustainable water supply • Increase reliability and diversity • Support an expanded seawater barrier • Reduce ocean discharges • Defer the need for a new ocean outfall Regional Benefits • Requires 50% less energy than water imported through the State Water Project (SWP) • Helps MWD meet long-term regional water supply needs • Consistent with the objectives of the CALFED process • Incorporates water reclamation into water resources management • Reduces wastewater discharge to the ocean GWR System Components Kraemer Basin Santa Ana River Fullerton •= Santiago Creek untingtonGroundwater Basin Beach seaWafer Pacific Intrusion Ocean Barrier um�� ..••••• � J,�J�IJ �aC9�1°rjk� Irvine Advanced r � Water Treatment Plant J �'s1IJ OVAI iiii��/ i •- M-47 cn ch ,. in Ellis Aven4 POFO / Garfield Ave. 01 • A Legend • • Existing Injection Wells f Newly Constructed Injection Wells Future �; Injection/Monitoring r/J Wells (GWR System) Mesa Water Pipe Legend Indianapolis Existing Proposed Talbert GapInjection Barrier • 28 existing multi-depth injection wells • Eight new GWR well sites � q J4Four new GWR Aaw t - monitoring wells / iP �l OOP Pk 00, 1 w v 1 - AiL • '•J 1 i� aan91 JGAIH eud ajuas Isom Guola paje3o-j . spuauaap uoipefu i u iseq -p!w aanin j p9jsuaiRs3 moll ajauailin aol paziS n� aajauaeip ui sa 3ui - . u 8L-09 `auiladid al!w V L uses aacua�, auz adz • 1 • d &TAjq W • IV W 1�1 _�, - - . . vim, j;•r_t - ,mot ``�=�! � _ ��.�� a �� F� ?�. . �• , Pe r.; fir�u�� l.t��.1 t. �� ! }„� ai ', - -fir�:1• �VW r t _yam` t __- - � -. -- �►/.�i,�� 2 l�Nooki T 1 �n ! r � t rk W zt W � N t I i 7A••id /� ,�jr •�',� }" / POW •IN1.�, 1-. •/ 1 .-.and -- _ ...i � /. r� •w��nl ins, j �: � ". � ,, _, � i' 1 �'OIL,l ,.f:•I� - i -.,. • AI, (, :• ■1■ .. - ,, Imo,; .. - _ , � 1 7 • gill n 1-'.:•.- :. �. ,, -•� .. - - �- r i` /r Al.. r Sl}' .._ y i&.y}.. ,� r h "w M , ••t _ w• L�t - • ley -- :��r,iO 'n �A �+.� 4 —aI •rSJ�}ai4a er: �ilir� ' r , 'r• * yy f fP', all�tiw I � �.,,-� J•-•1.► IsM/f 7 4�M+al'1'arY`Z �'. -` • q+'.�"' �1� �■ I•G�■ '11111111 1T !* 4! 1 • •fir{ Op Vwl�' 51■+�1r.� :�, fr' 31111k- W: so 1 1 l I � I° a+=•`��`,'-'"'`'''�"'T��:;.i yx`fir _�,f .J__sr. _'.{ AI Un it III Pi el * Alignment .. cam.:.:'- / �w S, 1 l� •, L � , ,f *71 IANI • 1 1 `z: Architectural Rendering . fir" AERIAL VIEW FROM ELLIS ST. & WARD ST. l'Q i = .N cc C.) cu t cc W ,.. �> .,.r lima C I Q ! , � J ca O .- W _" oo-*,% in LL .v m CU con O (n U o O �- d) L1J US Filter CMF=S MF System - 86 mgd Microfiltration r� System • Removes bacteria, protozoa, a n d suspended solids ,� �� . ,� , � �►. 0.2 micron pore size �� M - • Polypropylene fibers In basin submersible system • • Microfiltration as a Process water + contaminants Water is pushed through under pressure microscopic c pores in the • ■ . I� membrane leaving . ' • ■ ' ■'■• ■ ' contaminants on the ■J .; :, •' ■ � outside. Backwash 6 to OCSD f J rJ'f Purified J�JJr tt��tIJ�J��1IJ� Water C. o O OLo Imm O 00 r n O i � .� -W 0) 4) cn i cn .V cL CD O O O V� Lo clon pcn O GD GD U. 1 M � r` Oaa� � o� oa i N c clot 0� a w) a a �I .� �w �" Reverse Osmosis as a Process llilllll ' - embrane lj� UV S stem (Disinfectiony & NDMA) Trojan UVPhox System - ,01 w� 70 mgd low pressure 1 high intensity UV system I L • Removes trace organics f- • Uses Hydrogen Peroxide to form an Advanced Oxidation Process l / UV as a Disinfection Process UV light destroys - harmf u l compounds through t � • photolysis. p..long �- 1 i. t r `�� t ��+ ,�,,' 1��y�+Y C��.t� �q.r�'.e•.. d •fit- '�i,!+R; ,'�'�- %�ay7,�,t�►� . _ � \`` - - � � ��, J j,.�S!•_ ..yYT�- _ , -f �1 f•'- ••�? vT`� r`.�-;��'-tea Of rA' i ' :Y+• j IL • � fir' �' 71 i ,ter r... ` LL � r f , 1 p I . at -' , lie of lyl. �� r ,� '` �,, r ,fig -rJ• `` ~ It mrm�L Z << 7 � - _ � ►� �r_ ,�,�;�.� •" � fir' 44, ��, , •'_•,',Wig J- .. __ .. - � `�`. jl le + 4 ZA. It y ! *fk r� �. LI��. �0��.Pr.■N� r��rr►n b �, .�.��1111 1��;!�1rr�iL__„��s�,- ♦ir,,,--�.`.. - �� I T i r. :- .. ,t � -7117J��'��L Pt I - f —_- q - � •. �— y stir. � - �+�� .•:-�`-. . .--"". , 1 �, --;; _ - -1•.', 'T�''(�! y'r�� •� •lam--- ` -1 III •1 r y w rtt� 1 . __��_ • , ,� ITS t' ��b��; i I{. r GWR System Summary . Schedule ......... 2004 2005 26 2007 ID Task Name Start Finish "6Com tS%ConySONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASO ' AWTF CONTRACT Fri 6/11/04 Sat 10/13/07 24% 47% 2 REQUIRED Fri 6/1 1/04 Mon 9/10/07 25r/r 22�/r 3 PLANNED Fri 6/1 1/04 Sat 10/13/A7 24% 22ch 4 SUBS COMPL Thu 5/17/07 Thu 5/17/07 0% 01/ ■ 5 BARRIER WELLS & FAC. Mon 6/21/04 Suit 5/21/06 41% 56% 6 REQUIRED Mon 6/21/04 Sun 5/21 AM 411/ 41IN 7 PLANNED Mon 6/21/04 Sun 5/21/A6 417 41^/r 6 GWR UNIT 1 PIPELINE Fri 4/30/04 Sun 8/27/06 40% 57% Status Line : 03-31-05 s REQUIRED Fri 4/30/04 Sun 8/27/06 40% 23�/ 10 PLANNED Fri 4/30/04 sun x/27/06 4017( 23% " GWR UNIT 2 PIPELINE Niun 12/15/03 Thu 8/10/06 53% 59% t2 REQUIRED Mon 12/15/03 Thu 8/10/06 49% 47c/ 13 PLANNED Mon 12/15/03 Fri 3/17/A6 5717( 4714 14 GWR UNIT 3 PIPELINE wed 10/1A)3 Mort4/3/06 71% 6314 15 REQUIRED wed 1011103 Mon 4/3/06 60% 971h 16 PLANNED wed 10/1/03 Tue 6/21/05 971, 97% - — RequiredContract Contractor Planned Progress GWR System MonthlyExpenditure 111 1 111 0 Projected . 111 I / I 1 111 111 / 111 ILI 111 ._.■.u�n11.I��lU dur..■.■.Iu1r��f■r-..u11111��II��rllllll III��"II �I I I I I I I ■ � � 1 ■1 111 GWR System Cumulative = Monthly Expenditure 600,000 - o°0 500,000 ❑ Projected Status Line: 02-28-05 . 400,000 ❑ Actual 300,000 - 200.000 a W 100,000 --_---mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�� o - AMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Estimated Capital Cost Construction Contracts: Escalated Cost ($M) Treatment Facilities $303.0 GWRS Phase I & Site Power 17.1 GWR Pipeline* 68.5 Southeast Barrier & Lacy Pipeline 5.1 Barrier Facilities 16.6 Integrated Information System, Wells, 14.8 Workshops & Insurance ELA & Contingency $61 .8 Total $486.9 *3 contracts Grants and Loans • Secured Grants (OCWD & OCSD) - Bureau of Reclamation • $20 million - DWR • $30 million - State Water Bond • $37 million - EPA • $0.5 million - SWRCB • $5 million • Loans (OCWD) - SRF Loan • $145 million at 2.5% for 22.5 years • Subsidy (OCWD) - Local Resources Program $121/af for 31 ,000 of for 25 years Importance of Public Perception FN �6t yer F�oorl6es jods yep CommunityOutreach OIL,Search �FeVorlGes �t+kde ('-3� ®' J mess Q]t1IiD:I/MMfM'•9WTS/S[E(11.COrtt/ - - (�C{ LtIFS High Level of Treatment - Repienisnment Systems30 Year • of r Recycling Education Changes Reactions Visit website: about Ine System ��,�f, www. sctl[r punflcatron process � �� • • nt r/4DOn1 n..t,�aprMat,pm,ect aFpt A �wre�Solution�to M.._ . coon uplatet upntip OL��i� y DW_a_te_r�Needs n a � � m +�I aea I use�anracy nohcv ®20[J3 Groundwater Feplen�shmem System J Strong Community Support: Groups & People ^1 All major OC environmental • Joan Irvine Smith . groups • Over 50 different community �- 17 Major business, 18,000 small organizations businesses 0OC AARP • OC Business Councils & OC Taxpayers Assoc Chambers of Commerce League of Women Voters Los Amigos of OC F� Several Hispanic and Vietnamese OC state & federal delegations businesses and organizations ' 34 area water agencies 25 cities Former, CA Secretary of Health & t0 Several hospitals & medical Welfare centers Several local MD's • Water research experts at local 0 Susan Seacrest, Pres. National universities Groundwater Foundation 0 Former chief CA public health, Bishop Soto drinking water section • OC Farm Bureau • OC Fire Chiefs Assoc. Indirect Potable Reuse Projects Production Rate (mgd) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 GWR System (OCWD/OCSD) CA Whittier Narrows CA -- Upper Occoquan VA West Basin MWD CA South Lake Tahoe CA #} El Paso TX ' Los Angeles Harbor CA GWR Phase I (OCWD/OCSD) CA Scottsdale AZ Windhoek South Africa Alamitos Gap CA NEWater Project-Singapore Veurne-Ambacht Belgium ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 04/27/05 TIME: 7:00 m. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON................... ✓ ✓ (WILSON) ........................ BANKHEAD................... li (AMBRIZ).......................... CAVECCHE.................... (GARCIA) ......................... CHRISTY..................... (COLLINS)........................ CRANDALL................... (ROSEN) .......................... DALTON....................... ✓ ,� �L (KAWASHIMA) ................. DAVERT...................... —� (SHAWVER) .................... DOTSON..................... (WILSON)......................... DUVALL...................... —,G ,✓ UNDERHILL ECKENRODE. (SCHAFER)...................... FERRYMAN................... (BORTLE)......................... FRESCHI .............. ..... (COOK) ............................ HARDY......................... _� ✓ (CHOI).............................. KANG.......................... (SONDHI) ........................ LUEBBEN..................... ✓ (DOW) .............................. MARSHALL.................. �✓ ✓ N (SWAN) ............................ MILLER ......................... ✓ .� (BEAUMAN) .................... MOORE........................ (KIRKPATRICK-PILGER). NEUGEBAUER.............. 6L�, a (DRISCOLL) ..................... PARKER....................... ✓ ✓ T (WEBB) ............................ RIDGEWAY................... ✓ (HERNANDEZ)................. SIDHU.......................... �� ✓ A/ (CORREA)........................ SILVA........................... _z�t 2 4i (RODRIGUEZ).................. WALDMAN.................... JI'll _✓� (ANTOS) .......................... YOST ........................... 2 1� STAFF: Anderson q 54J, Beekman �D Ghirelli Poll � /�� Kovac Kyle ✓ Ludwin Miles ✓ �" Ooten ✓ Streed ,✓ � I Gt� Tomko OTHERS: Ho in 03/23/05 H:\dept\admin\BS\DIRECTOR\birectors Roll Call.doc SIGN-IN SHEET f�ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM k leaseprint) lease rint J 0 W4; Z A T-) la- L v' rz c kr v`l H:\WP.DTA\ADMIN\BS\FORMS\SIGN-IN FORM.DOC REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. �J DATE: ` C AGENDA ITEM NO. / NAME: (please print) ✓l /Y �Z HOME ADDRESS: / l �U � L (number/street) d� � 2 (city/zip code) �W /TELEPHONE: -7 7� y 7 L/oP 7 REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: r AGENDA ITEM NO. � E NAME: (please print) )O/�f�l �Wlv-JAA4N HOME ADDRESS: L4LKVVe 12gw-c (number/street) SIT A UA!f,>(15-fi/1,1e , r7 L 7 2zr( (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: Q0, _'"�O ` S�q REPRESENTING: ,U Q / aASg—e — ► U—c— (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: —2 - b AGENDA ITEM NO. L NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: c 2, (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: ' (self/name of organization) MENNEN 0 - -- . � I _W- -' 0 MENEFEE MIMI Leading edge technology of the AirLance" System AirLanceT"" Composting combined - ABT-HASKELL Design-Build expertise o The Haskell Company Organic Waste Recycling The need for environmentally sound recycling of the Successful composting millions of tons of organic waste generated daily is rapidly requires sufficient airflow increasing. Composting meets this need by biologically y decomposing biosolids, food waste, green waste, throughout the compost and wood waste under controlled conditions to permit mass to maintain land application of the product as a useful and beneficial aerobic conditions, soil amendment. remove moisture, and The main goal of any composting facility is to produce a control temperature. marketable product of high quality consistent with US EPA requirements. It must do so reliably and without negative impact on the host community. The state-of the art AirLance-"Composting System meets these goals cost effectively with a design that reduces the amount of land normally required and reduces energy/ manpower requirements,all with effective emissions and odor control. Process Flow The AirLance'"System composts pre-conditioned organic waste in 26 foot cubical cells.The number of _ cells built is based on the required design capacity and • type of waste processed. • The material remains in the cell for the full stabilization period. All the compost is shear-wall mixed daily by gravity.Efficient aeration and blending eliminates the need for continuous rehandling of the material. After blending pre-conditioned dry waste(amendment) with the wet waste(biosolids/foodwaste),the mixture i is deposited on the top of the compost cells.Compost is removed from the bottom of the cells by an outfeed screw removing approximately 1 to 2 feet of product at each pass. Material then simply drops down in the cell by gravity,mixing as it moves,to fill the void achieving true plug flow. Aerobic Composting r � Efficient aeration is the major key to producing a high , quality compost in the shortest time.The AirLance" Composting System was designed to maintain an aerobic composting environment and is the most efficient commercially available composting process in the world. Boom Efficient Land and Energy Use Open pile and static pile composting methods require large areas of land and months of processing time to produce a finished compost product.The AirLance" system dramatically reduces the amount of land required due to the efficiency of the aeration system, material handling, and vertical cell design. The net effect is that an AirLance'"composting facility requires only 10%of the land for a similarly sized open pile composting operation. Simply enclosing an open pile compost operation does not address odor and emission issues but rather creates an closed environment that is detrimental to the health of workers and the composting process.Thus, AirLance" ` large ventilation systems are required to make the Negative Positive Flow Flow interior air breathable.These ventilation systems require excessive amounts of energy to exhaust the fouled air into a biofilter.A similarly sized AirLance"composting AirLance Process facility only requires 10%of the energy required for an enclosed composting operation. fhe unique AirLance"design efficiently provides uniform aeration through out the compost biomass.As an analogy, composting is an aerobic biological fire.The efficiency of Cost Effective Solution this biological process can be measured by the BTU's of energy released during the process. Many cities presently using the horizontal pile approach have found composting to be a good answer for The unique AirLance1"System delivers air internally in a recycling organic waste.They are now looking for a three dimensional array via simultaneous positive and sytem that reduces emissions and odors in addition to negative lances creating a short horizontal airflow path. being energy and cost effecient.The AirLance'"process The result is a low pressure drop and the most energy provides the solution. efficient in-vessel composting system available. 41", 7 - Odor Control ABT-HASKEL Odor complaints resulting five miles away have closed American Bio Tech and The Haskell Company joint down both open pile and enclosed static pile facilities. venture,ABT-Haskell, provides organic waste recycling The key to effective odor prevention and control is services for municipal agencies.The advancements a system that utilizes an aerobic process within an provided by the AirLance"composting system enable enclosed facility which incorporates an effective air ABT-Haskell to provide a cost effective, long-term treatment system.The AirLance-"system addresses and solution for organic waste recycling. exceeds these requirements with a modular,enclosed design that utilizes a state-of the art odor control system. No Capital Investment ABT-Haskell offers a Design-Build-Own-Operate solution k that provides long-term contracts to municipal agencies WN nl�lz for organic waste disposal.These long-term contracts do not require capital investment on the part of the municipal agencies. AirLance'" Compost System vs. Enclosed Aerated Static Pile Static pile composting initially appears simple and easy,until it is attempted on a large scale. It is not inexpensive or simple when all the key issues are taken into account.The following is a comparison of an enclosed static pile and an Airl-ance'operation with similar processing capacities. FACILITY FOOT PRINT 30,000 sq. ft. vs. more than 400,.0M sq. ft. REDUCED VENTILATION AIR VOLUME 50 000 cfm vs. more than 1 million cfm ------ FACILITY ENERGY COST 200 000 vs.more than$2 million per year I COMPOSTIN FFICIENCY 2to 4 weeks vs to 6 months PROCESSING EFFICIENCY 1/2 to 2/3 less amendm nt requirement AERATION EFFr_IENCY P,auces anaerobic air p lutants in e t air to meet 80% luction requi nts of the South OVSt AQMD Rule 1133.2. ADVANCED EMISSION anOR CONTROL Average 95%odor capture vs. Biofilter ability to control 60% of the odors released into the community. EFFICIENT MATERIAL HANDLING All compost is moved through the process CABT-HASKEL and mixed daily using mainly gravity versus energy intensive equipment required in aerated static pile systems. 19100 Von Karman Avenue,Suite 450 Irvine,California 92612 949 756 9300 f 949 756 2400 www.abt-haskell.com � J J Records Retention Schedule 1 RE: AGENDA REM NO. 1 0-J - ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Appendix A Exhibit B Page 1 of S Date Issued: 11/17/2000 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Revision: 5 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revised 4/27/2005 Subject: Records Retention Schedule dditions in Blue, Changes in Red 1.1 INTRODUCTION It is the policy of the Orange County Sanitation District(the District)to maintain a records and information management program that provides for the identification,access and protection of all records generated or received by the District in the conduct of District business. Records Retention Schedule Record Series Retention Media Include: Paper, Videotape,Microfilm, Code Magnetic,Optical,etc. Office of Record Duplicate OFcial Citation V H C Secretary to Board CA GC 1 00 Abandonment 2 I,O r f r of Directors 60203 _ 101 Accident Records Safety&Health FCL 6 t— r r 102 Accounting Reports Accounting 1 1— 2 r r r [:10:3Accounts Payable Files Accounting I 1 I� AB 474 r r 104 Accounts Receivable AccountingIF 1 � 6F r � (— Files 1075 Administrative 3711 IF--ec riginating Division i 1F W r Records r to Board 106 I Agenda Reports I I,O r r F I- Jof Directors S F _ _I 1077 Air Quality Files Environmental 1 F5 r r� Compliance(ECS) _i -7[Secretary to Board 108 Annexation Files of Directors 11-0 I W W r 109 Annual Report, Accounting LO Financial 'i Annual Report, CA GC 1 10 Operational Originating Division AR 20 60203 r ro— r 00ocuments and Settings\Ow-Yeang\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7AA\Item 14(c)Records Management-att 3.doc JSkillman/GM-Admin 4 Records Retention Schedule ' - 111 Association Files Originating DivWn[ SU FSU r r 112 Audit Record, Environmental FLO ir r- r Environmental Compliance(ECS) I 5 F-1 13 Financial Audit Records, Accounting CL CL+6 AB 474 r r r _ _ ITM]FAudit Records, Internal Originating Division F 1 F -3 r r r F1715 [Banking Records Accounting E--' —771 Bids,Awards,Sole Purchasing& [--7 1 F1 FCL+6 r r r Sources Warehouse �[ 1 Bids, Board Review 1�trf etary to Board 1 CL+6 r r r 117 Required, Awarded Directors Bids,Board Review Secretary to Board CA GC FI18 I 1 FCL+6 r r r Required, Unawarded of Directors 60201(d) 119 Bids, U GC nawarded LPurchasing& 1 CL+6 CA IF r r _ _ Warehouse �� 60201(d) _ 120 Biosolids Management Environmental 1270l 571 40 CFR r r r Records Assessment(EAD) 503.17 121 Board Administration Secretary to Board 1 r r r Files _� of Directors 122 Bonds, Revenue Accounting ---"FEX FEX+2 r r —j 123 Budget Files, Accounting �� r r r Approved 124 Budget Files, Accounting F71 � r r r Preliminary F125 Cash Receipts Accounting _F4 r r r F126 Certificate of Insurance Purchasing& I FX+2 F r r Warehouse Certificate of Secretary to Board 127 Insurance, Board of Directors 1 FEX+2 FVr- r Approved Contracts 128 Chain of Custody Environmental F, Flo r r r Records, Laboratory Sciences Lab F ' 129 Chain of Custody, Source Control FI Fc L+3 r r r Source Control _ _ 130 Check Registers Accounting �� All 474 r r r [:131 Check Requests Accounting I 4 r r r FI 32 Checks,Cancelled Accounting F I 2 r r r F133 Checks,Copies Accounting �1 F 2 r r r C:\Documents and Settings\Ow-Yeang\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7AA\Item 14(c)Records Management-att 3.doc JSkillman/GM-Admin r Records Retention Schedule 3 1 i4 Records Chemical Inventory Originating Division T 1 2 r r r 251 [City/County Utility Engineeringequests Planning&Design Accounting/Risk CA GC 135 Claim Files 1 CL+6 r r r Management 60201 (d) 136 Complaint Files Originating Division 1 En 1:57137 Compliance Records Comvironmentalpliance(ECS) f r r Computer Maintenance Information 138 Technology 1 2 r r r [Files Administration Computer System Information F139 Technology 1 [27 r r- r Administration Records Administration Confined Space 8 CCR 5156- 1'� 40 Safety&Health 1 3 r r r Records _ 5159 CA EC 141 Conflict of Interest Secretary to Board 4 4 17001,CA r f f Filings of Directors GC 81000 J (e)— Purchasing& 142 Contracts/Agreements Warehouse CL FCL+6 r I— r Contracts/ Secretary to Board 143 Agreements, Board 1 [CL+6 Fv r r Approval Required of Directors 144 Crane Inspection Originating 1 SU 8 CCR 5022 Records Division (d), 8 CCR r r r 5031 Workforce Support FL O r r r Fl 45 Deferred CompensationRecords Services Fl46 Delegation of Secretary to Board 1 Flo r r r Authority Records of Directors Purchasing& F I F 147 Delivery Receipts Warehouse F4 r f f 2252 DOT Random Drug& Safety & Health 1 5 49 CFR 382F X Alcohol Test Records J� As Built Engineering I RET-1-o 148 Drawings, Planning&Design 1 —F 149 Drawings, Baseline Engineering FRE F 1-0r r r FP lanning&Design Engineering 150 Drawings, Bid Set RE LO r F r Planning&Design CADocuments and Settings\Ow-Yeang\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7AA\Item 14(c)Records Management-att 3.doc JSkillman/GM-Admin Records Retention Schedule 4 r�F248 Engineering Drawings,Conformed planning in Design RE LO X X i Engineering 1�9 Drawings, Record —L TRE I LO FX X Planning&Design l Shop Engineering RE FLO f r iF- I 5 1 Drawings, P planning&Design [254 Information r�E-mail Backup Tapes Technology RE weeks - gY - . Fl 52 Easements Secretary to Board I FL O r f� r of Directors F Employee Benefit Workforce Support 153 plans and Program Files Services I TE+7 — r r r Environmental Impact Engineering FI54 I LP r r r _Report Planning&Design [1557EOC Activation Safety &Health CL CL+2 Records l56 Equipment Records Originating Division LE r r r 157 Equipment Ownership Mechanical I r r r Maintenance FI-58-1 Expense Reports Accounting F 1 _F Ali 474 r r r Financial Planning 159 Accounting IF 1 r f r Records _F_ 160 Financial Statements Accounting I 10 r f r 161 Fixed Asset Records Accounting 1 Flot- 162 Flow Records Originating Division L - LI _ r r F1-63 � Formation Files [Secretary to Board I FLI CA GC 4700 r of Directors 60201(d) 164 General Ledger Accounting � I LI r r FI65Grant Records Finance 65 1 2 r r Unsuccessful Administration Grievances/ [Human Resources 166 Complaints Records Administration CL [CL+2 r r r FI67 Hazardous Waste F_ Safety&Health 1 22 r r r Records � 66262262 1678 Historical subject Files Communications 1 LO r r r Administration � L 169 I-9 Forms Workplace Support TE TE+3 8 USE f r r Services �� 1234A rds sionFCL [C-7 29 CF R r r r 1904.2, 29170 Incident Reo O D C:\Documents and Settings\Ow-Yeang\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7AA\Item 14(c)Records Management-att 3.doc JSkillman/GM-Admin Records Retention Schedule 5 F7F7CFR 1904.6 1771Industrial Hygiene � 171 Files r — —, Safety&Health I 3 FTE+30 r r r I FInspection Records, Construction 72172 Construction Daily I CL+6 Fr Progress Management 1 7 i Inspection Records, Construction 1L T—LO r r Construction Specialty Management Fl 74 Inspection Reports, Collection Facilities 1 Flo r I Manhole Maintenance _ 175 I Insurance Policies FAccounting LOX r r F176 Investment Records FAccounting F_ SA SA+6 r r r 246 IT Backup Tapes Information UX�, Technology J FS 177 I Job Descriptions Workplace Support CL CL+10 r r- - Services r 178 Journal Entries Accounting F 1 6 r r Environmental 1 F2 79 Laboratory Records Sciences Lab Flo r r r 253 I Laboratory Data Environmental SU Flo Backup Tapes Sciences Lab F 180 Legislation Files EAD/ECS [717F_3 F243 Line Maintenance Files Collection Facilities AR LO r r r Maintenance F 181 Records CA GC Litigation Files Management CL CL+6 6 CA ( r r r T82 Logs Originating Division CL+2 CL+2 r r r F 83 Logs, Control Center Operations-Plant 1 CL FCL+30 r r r &2 � IF84Master Plans/ Secretary to Board ' OCSD RES 184 SU+10 r r r Strategic Plans of Directors J 98-16 l85 Material Safety Data FSafety&Health 1 TE+30 r r r Sheets ��, 29CFR [186 Medical Files Safety&Health 1 TE+30 '1 1910.1001, 8 r r f� _ _CCR 3204 Meeting Minutes, F I 1— I R7 m Originating Division I 1 I / Administrative CA GC r r Meeting Minutes, Secretary to Board 148 1 LO f� � Board of Directors 60201 (d) C:\Documents and Settings\Ow-Yeang\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7AA\Item 14(c)Records Management-att 3.doc JSkillman/GM-Admin Records Retention Schedule 6 Meeting Minutes, Secretary to Board 1LOCA GCBoard Committees of Directors _F,89 � 60201 (d) 190 Monthly Reports Originating Division ��R777 191 Operating Journals Originating Division I I r r r F192 Operating Records [Or�ig7inang Division �AR [:571 r r r :19:3] Opinions Secretary to Board , FL O r r of Directors Secretary to Board CA HI-,SF 194 Ordinances of Directors SU IL O 6491.3 1� I� r AB 474 _ 195 OSHA Compliance Safety&Health SUTS-� U r r r Records 29 CFR, 1976 Payroll Records Accountina 1 7 516.5 F r r _ AB 474 FI 97 Permits Originating Division I EX+1 198 Permits,AQMD Environmental Compliance(ECS) F FEX1 r r r CA H&S 199 Permits, Building and Secretary to Board CL LO 19850, H&S r r r Construction of Directors 4003,H&S 4004 F200 Permits, Secretary to Board 40 CFR NPDES SU 10 Fr r r _ of Directors � 125.30(h) F201 Permittees Files Source Control CL+3 i r r r F202 Personnel Files Human Resources TE [T7E29 CFR I627.3 rrr � 203 Petty Cash Records Accounting F 1 4 r r r Policies/Procedures Secretary to Board F204 SU F +10 F f� r Administrative of Directors Policies/Procedures, Mechanical 205 Operations and Maintenance SU Fsu+ 1 0 r r r Maintenance 247 Problem Reports for Collection Facilities 6 Collection Systems Maintenance FARF 206 Project Files Originating Division CL CL+6 r r r F207 Proof of Publication, Secretary to Board 1 Or r r Ordinances of Directors FF—L Originating 245 Public Comment Files Division CL 2 C:\Documents and Settings\Ow-Yeang\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7AA\Item 14(c)Records Management-att 3.doc JSkillman/GM-Admin Records Retention Schedule 7 Records 50 Public Record Requests CL LO I X 2 FManagement �� 1 F20�[Public Relations CommunicationsSUrr r ecords Administration�� Communications FS U r r r 209 Publications Administration [—, rchase Order Files Purchasing and 210 Pu CL CL+6 r r r (OA and OB) Warehouse �F 2�6 Purchase Order Files Purchasing and CL(OP and OS) j Warehouse� ]—cL-+2 1 1 Purchase Requisition Purchasing il F and CL EcL+6 Files(OA and OB) Warehousen � 257 Purchase Requisition Purchasing and I C CL+2 Files(OP and OS) Warehouse I L Rate Advisory Finance F212 ' 1 F, F r � Committee_Records Administration_ Real Estate Records Secretary to BoardsUr[2713 � of Directors I ' [F4�] Recorded Documents Secretary to Board 110 r P r of Directors E215CRecords Destruction Secretary to BoardLOertificates _ of Directors I I F216 Records Management Secretary to Board r- r r Files j of Directors I ' Records Retention Secretary to Board r r r 217 Schedules of Directors 1 Fsu+10 218 Recruitment Records Workplace SupportFcL FCL+2 29 CFR r r r Services 1627.3 219 Reference Files Originating Division sT7I- _su r r r r [:2720 Reports,Financial Accounting � 'F 4 IF- r r 221 Reports,General O F �riginating Division; EE ir- r rJ j 222 Reports,Technical Originating Division SU IL— ]f- r r 244 Materials Research/Reference I Originating Division F AR AR Fr r Secretary to Board F223 Resolutions, Board — SU FLI r r r of Directors Risk Management Accounting/Risk isk j 224 g — F 1 FCL+5F r r r � Reports J Management �F Salary Deduction Workplace Support 225 Records for Benefits Services [TE+7 C:\Documents and Settings\Ow-Yeang\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7AA\Item 14(c)Records Management-att 3.doc JSkillman/GM-Admin Records Retention Schedule 8 Security Clearance Information F226 Records,Computer Technology 1 TE+3 r r r J Systems Administration _J Engineering F227][Sewer Line Records SU FS U r r Planning&Design Software Application Information 228 Technology I I LO F- r ❑ Files Administration_ [2729LS�pecifications&Plans Secretary to Board 1 I,O r 1— f of Directors �� 230 ][Speeches/Presentations Originating Division � — J ❑ r 231 Subject Files Originating Division AR F�R r r f 232 Submittals/Design plane ng&DesignEngineering Fs U Fs U F r f Tax Records, 29 CFR r r F 33 AccountingCL Employee 1 +4 j 516.5 _ � 234 Tax Records,Vendor Accounting II 1 FCL+6 26 r r C 4RI.6041.1 F235 Training Records Employee CL 3 f r r Development FT377 Travel Records ForiginatingDivisi�F I _ AB 474 r r I- 8 Trial Balance Records [ Accounting ID Lr r f 23J 239 Underground Storage Environmental 1 23 CCR f r rTanks Files Assessment(EAD) FLO�L 2772 _ I F 55 Video Surveillance Information SU SU+3 Tapes Technology J months Purchasing and 40 Warehouse Records 1 CL+2 r r r 2 FWarehouse L 1 I241 Wastehauler Files P5—a M&Source 1 3 Fr- r f Control T427� Work Orders Originating Division CL CL+I r f r Workers Compensation 252 j Files Safety&Health CL FE� T-1- -- — L RETENTION PERIOD EVENT Code: All retention periods are listed in years(unless otherwise specified) and are in addition to the current year. Life of Annual Closed, LO Organization, Sale, AR CL LP SA I SU Superseded Review � I Completed �LE Plant, Disposition Equipment, _ AU �FAfter EX Expired FRE Revised ST/PD Settlement/Paid TE Termination Audit C:\Documents and Settings\Ow-Yeang\L.ocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7AA\Item 14(c)Records Management-att 3.doc JSkillman/GM-Admin Record Series with Definitions ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Appendix B Exhibit C Page 1 of 12 Date Issued: 11/17/2000 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Revision:5 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revised: 04/27/2005 Subject: Record Series with Definitions Additions in Blue Changes in Red 1.1 INTRODUCTION It is the policy of the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD) to maintain a records and information management program that provides for the identification, access and protection of all records generated or received by OCSD in the conduct of OCSD business. RECORD SERIES WITH DEFINITIONS 100 Abandonment Records regarding abandonment,condemnation, demolition, or relocation of real property. r69 Accident Records [damargedr' ecods lated to accidents during which OCSD property is . Does not include records on employee injury. 102 JAccounting Reports IReports summarizing accounting transactions. 103 Accounts Payable Files Records relating to payment of financial obligations(money owed by the organization).Includes vendor and contractor invoices,bills, statements and any non-discharged debt. 104 Accounts Receivable Files Records related to accounting for money owed to the organization includes user fees. 105 Administrative Records Records of a general nature including copies of memos, letters, chronological files,calendars,day timers,phone messages,etc. that pertain to general administrative activities and duties of the Division. 106 Agenda Reports Records related to information provided to an official Board of Directors or board committee for consideration and action at official proceedings of the board committee including board agendas. 107 Air Quality Files Records related to South Coast Air Quality Management District(AQMD) regulations,emissions monitoring and violations. ]08 JAnnexation Files lRecords regarding the annexing of property to the organization. 109 Annual Reports, Financial Records relating to the published annual financial reports, describing the financial status of the organization. 110 Annual Reports, Operational Records relating to the published annual technical and operational status and performance reports of the organization. CADocuments and Settings\Ow-Yeang\L.ocal SettingsU mporary Internet HeAOLVAA\Item 14(c)Records Management-att 4.doc 1 JSkillman/GM-Admin Record Series with Definitions 111 Association Files reds related to membership or the activities of professional ustry associations of which the organization is a member a business interest. ff Audit Records, Records documenting the review of compliance activities with Environmental ]established environmental quality standards. 113 Audit Records,Financial Records relating to the review and monitoring of any accounting or financial records to ensure compliance with GAAP standards and the organization's procedures. 114 Audit Records, Internal Records related to internal reviews of OCSD activities to ensure compliance with procedures and standards. Does not include financial or environment audit records. 115 Banking Records Records related to bank transactions including deposit of funds, bank statements,bank reconciliation's,and wire fund transfers. 116 Bids, and Sole Sources, The successful proposals submitted by vendors to obtain Awarded contracts with OCSD, where OCSD selects that bid or proposal. Includes bid packages and sole sources. 117 Bids,and sole sources, The successful proposals requiring board approval,submitted Board Review Required, by vendors to obtain contracts with OCSD, where OCSD selects Awarded that bid or proposal. Includes bid packages and sole sources. 118 Bids, Board Review Proposals,requiring board approval, submitted by vendors to Required, Unawarded obtain contracts with OCSD, where OCSD does not award that bid or proposal. Includes bid packages. 119 Bids, Unawarded The unsuccessful proposals submitted by vendors to obtain contracts with OCSD, where bid is not awarded to that vendor. Includes bid packages. 120 Biosolids Management Records related to biosolids hauling,use,and EMS activities. Records 121 Board Administrative Files Records relating to board members,appointments to the board/ directors list. 122 Bonds, Revenue Bonds, revenue records relating to interest bearing certificates (negotiable instruments) issued by OCSD to raise revenues, including certificates of participation and any non-discharged debt. 123 Budget Files,Approved Records relating to internal planning and financial management. Includes budge vs.cost reports, summaries, worksheets,goals and objectives and milestones. 124 Budget Files,Preliminary Records related to projected income and records that are "working copies"preliminary worksheets and drafts developed in preparation of a budget of authorized expenditures. 125 Cash Receipts IRecords related to cash payment received. 126 Certificate of Insurance Proof of insurance coverage, such as board forms, required by OCSD for OCSD vendors providing certain goods or services under contracts that do not require board approval. CADocuments and Settings\Ow-YeangU.ocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7AA\Item 14(c)Records Management-att 4.doc 2 JSkillman/GM-Admin Record Series with Definitions r Certificate of Insurance, Proof of insurance coverage, such as board forms,required by Board Approved Contracts OCSD for OCSD vendors providing certain goods or services under contracts requiring board approval. P91,aboratory Chain of Custody Records, Records related to proving ownership or provenance of a specimen, solution or sample. P-19Source Chain of Custody Records, Records acknowledging receipt of split sample,taken by a Control source control inspector. 130 Check Registers Records listing individual checks issued,the date,payee, Jamount and purpose of the expense. _ 131 Check Requests Forms requesting the issuance of a check of warrant to pay for OCSD incurred expenses. 132 Checks,Cancelled OCSD issued checks cashed by the payee and returned to OCSD by the paying financial institution. 133 Checks,Copies Copies of OCSD issued checks usually filed together by check number. 134 Chemical Inventory Records [Recordsstsrelated to chemical delivery,chemical transfers,usage, anife worksheets and inventory logs. City/County Utility Requests Utility requests from cities and the County of Orange, [25 1 Consulting Engineers and General Correspondence with Cities &County 135 Claim Files Records regarding claims of wrongdoing by the organization or its employees. Claims generally request compensation for damage or loss. 136 Complaint Files Records related to complaints filed by the public regarding the organizations operations or activities. Includes problem reports and follow up activities. 137 Compliance Records Records relating to monitoring the environment and ensuring compliance with pertinent regulations. Includes compliance, monitoring, QA,QC and spill reports. 138 Computer Maintenance Files Records regarding work activities to maintain and ensure continued operation of computer systems and applications. 139 Computer System Records related to the maintenance of software applications. Administration Records 140 Confined Space Records Records related to procedures,permits and entry into confined spaces. 141 Conflict of Interest Filings Records relating to conflict of interest filings for candidates for the board, for existing board members,and designated employees. 142 Contracts/Agreements Records relating to obligations defined in contracts and agreements not requiring board approval. Includes promissory agreements,contracts and pending contracts for services, leases and software licenses. CADocuntents and Settings\Ow-Yeang\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7AA\Item 14(c)Records Management-att 4.doc 3 Bkillman/GM-Admin Record Series with Definitions 143 Contracts/Agreements, Records relating to obligations defined in contracts and Board Approval Required agreements requiring board approval. Includes promissory agreements,contracts and pending contracts for services, leases and software licenses. 144 Crane Inspection Records Records related to periodic inspection,annual certifications, quadrennial proof load test reports, and permit to operate cranes and derricks. 145 IDeferred Compensation Records of employee contributions and OCSD payments. 146 Delegation of Authority Records specifying the person(s) having the temporary authority Records to approve specified activities or documents during the absence of the individual normally authorized to perform the activities or approve documents. 147 Delivery Receipts Records documenting receipt of shipped items. May include delivery shipment receipts and registered mail receipts which may be filed with Purchase Orders. F52 DOT Random Drug& Records of tests done by outside contractor in compliance with Alcohol Test Records DOT required Random Drug&Alcohol Testing 148 Drawings,As-Built Records that graphically depict specifications. Copy of confirmed drawings marked up by contractors during construction to show how facility or component is actually constructed. 149 Drawings, Baseline Records that graphically depict specifications for piping and instrumentation. Includes control logic diagrams and loop diagrams. 150 Drawings,Bid Set Drawings that graphically depict specifications for the design of buildings,building systems, and subsystems,proposed construction or architectural renderings. 248 Drawings,Conformed The drawings generated for use during the construction phase of a contract from the bid set of contract plans that have been updated with an interpretation of changes that have occurred as a result of addenda issued during the bidding period. 249 Drawings, Record The District's best record of the construction of a project. Conformed drawings that have been updated with any changes occurring during the construction of the contract. 151 Drawings, Shop Records including drawings,diagrams, illustrations,schedules, performance charts,brochures and other data that are prepared by contractors, manufacturers,suppliers or distributors and which illustrate some portion of the project. 254 E-mail Back up Tapes E-mail messages on the Exchange Server 152 Easements Records related to the right of access to,and maintenance of, sewer related properties. 7Employee Benefit Plans and Records related to all employee benefits plans,and programs Program Files including health insurance,tuition reimbursement, thrift plans, 7 beneficiary designations,eligibility. CADocurnents and Settings\Ow-Yeang\Local SettingsWemporary Internet FileAOLVAMItem 14(c)Records Management-att 4.doc 4 JSkillman/GM-Admin Record Series with Definitions 154 Environmental Impact FDistrict.ords;EIR's d to prepare the draft and final EIR published by the Report rict a submitted from outside sources for review by 155 EOC Activation Records Records related to documenting activities of emergency operations center(EOC)during a declared emergency. 156 Equipment Maintenance Records regarding maintaining OCSD equipment and vehicles Records (excluding crane records) includes daily maintenance reports, service checklist, preventative maintenance schedules, service logs and test records. 157 Equipment Ownership Records related to ownership of equipment including correspondence,drawings,operating instructions, warranties and registrations. 158 Expense Reports Records relating to the reimbursement of District employees, Members of the Board of Directors, and Contractors for expenses incurred for travel or other costs when conducting the organizations business. 159 Financial Planning Records related to the budgeting and planning of the organizations revenues and expenses. 160 Financial Statements Records stating the financial position and condition of the organization. 161 Fixed Asset Records Records relating to the acquisition,depreciation and accruals of Jfixed assets. 62 Flow Records �Records related to tracking influent and effluent.1 . 163 Formation Files Records documenting the terms under which OCSD was formed,organized,re-organized or consolidated. [i�4 General Ledger Fpostimngsto m of all financial accounts. Records relating to the the General Ledger. r65 Grant Records, Unsuccessful Records regarding unsuccessful grant applications for federal or state grants. 166 Grievance Records includes arbitration between employer and employee, grievances, union requests,employee rights,employee rights information,appeals, sexual harassment information and civil rights information. 167 Hazardous Waste Records Records regarding the storage, transport, or handling of hazardous waste. Includes Lockout/tagout and mapping source records. 168 Historical Subject Files Records retained for the life of the organization due to their enduring value, rather than solely for business or legal purposes. Records that document the origination, significant events,and strategic planning of the organization. 169 I-9 Forms Forms required by the federal government under the requirements of the Immigration Reform/Control Act of 1986. CADocuments and Settings\Ow-Yeang\l ocal Settings\Temporary Internet)iles\OLK7AA\Item 14(c)Records Management-att 4.doc 5 Bkillman/GM-Admin Record Series with Definitions 170 Incident Records Includes records regarding unscheduled maintenance,or deliberate property damage such as theft,arson, vandalism,or other loss of OCSD assets. Does not include safety organizations' accident reports. 171 Industrial Hygiene Files Reports and documentation prepared by staff and certified industrial hygienist; includes ergonomics of the workplace, air sampling,noise testing,and workplace contaminants. 172 Inspection Records, Records related to inspection of the daily progress of Construction Daily Progress construction activities to ensure quality and compliance with specifications and standards. 173 Inspection Records, Records relates to specialty inspection of construction activities Construction Specialty to ensure compliance with specifications. Includes welding, vibration analysis,soils analysis and pile driving inspections. 174 Inspection Reports,Manhole Records related to the comprehensive evaluation of the wear condition of the manhole structure including frame and cover replacement records. 175 Insurance Policies Records related to insurance policies purchased by OCSD, including the policies and any amendments. 176 Investment Records IRecords relating to investments including the purchase of stocks, bonds or other equities,ownership and account _ statements._ Computer tapes used for Disaster Recovery purposes F24 6 IT Backup Tapes 177 Job Descriptions Records describing the duties and responsibility of each job r9 position and the expectations for performance. 178 lJournal Entries JAccount postings with supporting documentation. 179 Laboratory Records Records related to laboratory activities including data logs, lab equipment maintenance and sterilization,QA and QC records. 253 Laboratory Data Backup Statistical laboratory data housed on the chromium and Tapes erbium servers 180 Legislation Files Records regarding local, state and federal legislation,session bills,lobbying files and summaries of bills that may affect OCSD's operations or organization. 243 Line Maintenance Files Video tapes and other records of maintenance and inspection of sewer lines. !81 Litigation Files Records related to possible or actual litigation or government investigations. Includes court proceedings records,pleadings, discovery, work product,exhibits and final judgments. 182 Logs A document listing activities, items, individuals and noting the same information about each entity. Log entries generally occur in chronological order. 183 Logs,Control Center Bound notebooks describing activities, items or individuals regarding plant operations. Log entries generally occur in chronological order. 00ocuments and Settings\Ow-Yeang\L.ocal SettingATemporary Internet FileAOLVAA\Item 14(c)Records Management-att 4.doc 6 AkillmardGM-Admin Record Series with Definitions 184 Master/Strategic Plans Report describing long range program or major projects PI and goals of OCSD. Includes strategic plans. 185 Material Safety Data Sheets Records relating to the description and use of hazardous substances. F86 Medical Files Records related to the medical history of employees, including injury and illness records. 187 Meeting Minutes, Meeting minutes,administrative records regarding the agenda Administrative and description of the decisions made or actions taken during the meeting, for meetings not board-related. 188 Meeting Minutes, Board Records regarding agenda,meeting minutes, resolutions,actions and decisions,of the Board of Directors. Includes administrative orders, minute orders and minute actions. F�9 Meeting Minutes, Board Records regarding agenda,meeting minutes, resolutions,actions Committees and decisions of a board committee. 190 Monthly Reports Records related to operating and status information used to complete OCSD annual reports. 191 Operating Journals Daily entries documenting activities in district operations. Includes crew schedules. 192 Operating Records Fre s related to district operations. Includes data books, g reports,overtime,crew schedules and daily lab 193 10pinions Written legal opinions resulting from research on a given topic. 194 Ordinances Regulations enacted by board action and related records. Includes local limits report. 195 OSHA Compliance Records Records describing procedures for emergencies. Includes disaster recovery procedures. 196 Payroll Records Records including timesheets,unemployment claims, garnishments and the payment of labor costs including salaries, wages,compensation and deductions for employees,Board Members and Contractors. 197 Permits Records including permits to operate plants, machinery, equipment and vehicle permits. Also includes right-of-way records and sewer connection permits. Does not include NPDES or AQMD permits or permits granted to the EAC. 198 Permits, AQMD [equuipm ecords related to permits granted by AQMD to operate various ent and engines. 199 Permits,Building and Records related to plans,signs, grading,encroachment, Construction including blueprints and specifications. Approval to construct or renovate property. 200 Permits,NPDES Records relating to the application for a permit(section 301H Waiver)to discharge pollutants, in compliance with the Clean Water Act. Includes the permit. r Permittee Files Records related to monitoring businesses with discharge permits and urban runoff. CADocutnents and Settings\Ow-Yeang\Local SettingATemporary Internet Files\OLK7AA\Item 14(c)Records Management-att 4.doc 7 JSkillman/GM-Admin Record Series with Definitions 202 Personnel Files re rds relating to individual employees. Records may include oyment applications,performance evaluations, salary mation,and separation documents. 203 Petty Cash Records Records documenting replenishment of cash and disbursements lof cash from the petty cash fund. 204 Policies/Procedures Records providing documentation on the implementation of Administrative management and administrative policies and directions for various organizational functions. 205 Policies/Procedures, Records providing documentation on the implementation of Operating and Maintenance technical and operating policies and directions for various operational functions. Includes technical, vendor and engineering manuals. r�'—]Collection Problem Reports for Communications, in any media, received as a result of a Systems collection system problem 206 Project Files Records related to activities of limited duration (defined start and end date),as opposed to activities of an ongoing nature. Can include a wide variety of documents gathered for reference on a specific project.Also referred to as job or contract files. 207 Proof of Publication, — Records related to proving that required public notices have Ordinances _[been published in prescribed publications. 245 Public Comment Files Communications, written,voice and digital from the public on District matters _ 250 Public Record Requests Records reflecting Public Record Requests including letters, memo's,_a-mails and Public Record Request Forms 208 Public Relations Records Records related to preparing public information,brochures describing OCSD activities,photographs and graphics used. 209 Publications Records related to providing information to the public and to staff about OCSD activities. Includes internal newsletters and news clippings. F�—O]and Purchase Order Files(OA Records monitoring the procurement of goods and/or services. OB) _ 256 Purchase Order Files(OP and OS) 21 I Purchase Requisition Files Records related to the request for procurement of goods or (OA and OB) services. Records initiating the purchasing process. r5—]and Purchase Order Files(OP OS) ri- Rate Advisory Committee Records related to determining rates and fees charged by Records OCSD. 213 IReal Estate Records lRecords related to real estate for purchases. 214 Recorded Documents The official version of a document recorded by the County Recorders office.Includes notice of completion,deeds and easements. CADocuments and Settings\Ow-Yeang\Local SettingATemporary tntemct Mes\OLVAA\Item 14(c)Records Management-att 4.doc 8 JSkillman/GM-Admin Record Series with Definitions 215 Records Destruction Documents certifying(confirming) the destruction of official Certificates records that have been approved for destruction. The certification attests to the fact that destruction was accomplished in accordance with applicable procedures. 216 Records Management Files Records regarding the management of OCSD records,including records maintenance and transfer records. Does not include the retention schedule or destruction certificates. rr s Retention Schedules The document that lists each record series and the associated retention times,characteristics,responsible division,and legal citations,if applicable. 218 Recruitment Records Records regarding the advertisement of available positions of requirements for specific skills, or the interview and selection process for prospective employees, includes job fair records,job postings,advertising, interviews,resumes,applications,and testing.. 219 Reference Files Documents published by outside organizations,used for reference,study and research. Usually library-type(published) documents (i.e. books,technical journals,periodicals)or reference materials kept only until superceded by the next edition. 220 Reports, Financial Records relating to financial, fiscal and monthly reports. May include worksheets, spreadsheets, analysis and reports of financial or investment results. 221 Reports, General Records generated internally and periodically, relating to the status or progress of routine activities or statistics. r22 Reports,Technical Records related to the preparation of technical or management reports based on studies, the completed report or study. r44 Research/Reference Files Material used as reference in development of current matters or projects 223 Resolutions, Board Formal expression of the will, opinion and intent voted by the Board of Directors, legislative-type actions. ri4 Risk Management Report records related to OCSD claims,loss runs,federal OSHA forms, loss analysis and related records. 225 Salary Records Records related to OCSD employees deduction authorization, beneficiary designations. 226 Security Clearance Records, Fae related to authorizing employees or contractors to have Computer Systems o an OCSD computer system, system module or the data n a computer system or system module. 227 Sewer Line Records Feasements, ords related to sewer operations and maintenance. Includes atlas, sewer line videotapes and sewer index maps. 228 Software Application Files Records related to software applications owned by OCSD. Includes software registrations. 229 Specifications & Plans Records of the precise details and description of the service or project to be completed,or the item to be ordered, as approved by the Board of Directors. CADocuments and Settings\Ow-Yeang\Local SettingsWemporary Internet Files\OLK7AA\Item 14(c)Records Management-att 4.doc 9 JSkillman/GM-Admin Record Series with Definitions 230 Speeches/Presentations Records related to the preparation of presentation materials by OCSD employees or board members. Includes text of speech, presentation materials or computer presentation software files. 231 Subject Files Records related to topics and issues filed by the subject of the records. May include studies, reports and other results of research activities. 232 Submittals,Design Plans and specifications submitted by contractors for OCSD's review and approval at specified completion stages (e.g. 30%, 60%,90%, 100%) of the engineering design phase. 233 Tax Records Records relating to the maintenance of information about tax liabilities, withholding and payment of taxes, records related to payment of State and Federal taxes including forms 1096 and W-2. 234 Tax Records, 1099'S Records related to reporting to the IRS, miscellaneous income paid to vendors and contractors. 235 Training Records Records relating to the training and orientation of employees, except for safety training. Records may include class attendance sheets,schedules,classes offered and records of class curriculum or syllabus,training materials development. 236 Training Records, Safety Records relating to the training of employees in the areas of safety. Records may include class attendance sheets, schedules, classes offered and records of class curriculum or syllabus, training materials development. 237 Travel Records Records documenting travel requests, itineraries, lodging or transportation reservations for employees,Board Members and Contractors. Expense reports are a separate record series. 238 Trial Balance records summary record of account balances by debits and dits to prove accuracy of accounting data. rliles nderground Storage Tank Records related to the maintenance of underground storage tanks. Includes permit._ 255 Video Surveillance Tapes Video surveillance tapes from various security cameras on site at OCSD plants 240 Warehouse Records Records related to managing the warehouse, including sales orders, stock out,shipping records,ABC. Waste Hauler Files r49 Records related to transporting waste to or from OCSD plants. Includes manifests and waste-hauler schedules. �42 Work Orders Records related to requesting repairs,alterations, improvements, maintenance or other services; records related to the completion of the work requests. 252 lWorkers Compensation Files Records relating to employee work related injuries CADocuments and Settings\0w-Yeang\Loca1 SettingATemporary Internet FileAOLVAA\Item 14(c)Records Management-att 4.doc 10 JSkillman/GM-Admin =�`OJ'gjj SANIf4f OyO� ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT LS 9 90 F � Cf'Y6 fH £N�\P April 27, 2005 phone: (714)962-2411 Comments by David Ludwin, OCSD Director of Engineering, given at April 27, 2005 fax: Board of Directors meeting. (714)962-0356 www.acsd.com mailing address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley.CA 92728-8127 The Orange County Sanitation District staff and Board of Directors have been made street address: aware of certain allegations against Helix Electric, Inc. Helix is the electrical 10844 Ellis Avenue subcontractor named by the low bidder, J.F. Shea, for project P2-66, Headworks Fountain Valley.CA p 9270e-701e Replacement at Plant No. 2. At this time, staff is in the process of investigating and evaluating information we have Member Agencies been provided by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), the • Orange County Labor Management Cooperative Trust, and Legal and Safety Cities Employer Research (LASER). Staff has met with J.F. Shea and their proposed subcontractor Helix, and has offered to meet with IBEW and the other concerned Anaheim organizations to receive information related to the allegations. Brea Buena Park Cypress Staff will continue to conduct due diligence to assure the District contracts with Fountain Valley Fullerton responsible contractors on this and all District projects. We will be bringing the Board Garden Grove of Directors a recommendation regarding this issue at the regular Board meeting in Huntington Beach Irvine May for their consideration. Le Habra La Palma Los Alamitos Newport Beach Orange Placentia Santa Ana Seal Beach Stanton Tustin Villa Park Yorba Linda County of Orange Sanitary Districts Costa Mesa Midway City Water Districts Irvine Ranch To maintain world-class leadership in wastewater and water resource management. MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, April 13, 2005, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on April 13, 2005, at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: DIRECTORS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager Roy Moore, Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance/Treasurer Mike Duvall, Vice Chair Carol Beekman, Director of Communications & Bill Dalton Administrative Services Rich Freschi Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Phil Luebben David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Darryl Miller Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Joy Neugebauer Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology James W. Silva Mike White, Controller Jeff Reed, Human Resources Manager DIRECTORS ABSENT: Doug Cook, Operations Manager Steve Anderson, Board Chair Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Jim Ferryman, Vice Board Chair Anne Marie Feery, Purchasing/Contracts Supervisor Edith Smith, Financial Analyst OTHERS PRESENT: Juanita Skillman, Records Management Specialist Brad Hogin, General Counsel Lilia Kovac, Assistant Board Secretary Don Hughes (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Moore had no report. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, requested that Item 11(b), Biosolids Update, be considered at this time. Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, reported that the OMTS Committee approved unanimously to recommend to the Board of Directors at the April board meeting to authorize the Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 March 9, 2005 General Manager to negotiate final terms and conditions for a contract with EnerTech Environmental, Inc. to manage biosolids at their facility in Rialto, California and to return the contract to the Board of Directors for approval; and to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Memorandum of Understanding with South Orange County Wastewater Authority (SOCWA), authorizing the General Manager to continue participation with Phase II work including the on- going preliminary facility design, permitting, and community relations activities for the development of a composting facility at the Prima Deshecha Landfill in South Orange County, as managed by SOCWA, for an amount not to exceed $150,000. Dr. Ghirelli and Anne Marie Feery, Purchasing/Contracts Supervisor, provided a brief presentation on the current and the long-range biosolids management program, the regulatory, legislative and litigation issues, and the intensive request-for-proposals process undertaken to arrive at staffs recommendation. Dr. Ghirelli responded to Directors' questions regarding the application of technology utilized by EnerTech. Blake Anderson also reported on problems encountered on the Groundwater Replenishment System project. While tunneling underneath the Santa Ana Freeway near the Santa Ana River, large amounts of construction debris have been encountered and have damaged the construction equipment. (6) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER Gary Streed, Director of Finance, reported staff has not heard from Moss Levy, the District's contract internal auditor. He advised he was reluctant to contact the firm since they work for the Directors. After a brief discussion with the Directors, staff was directed to contact Moss Levy and request Moss Levy to attend an upcoming FAHR Committee meeting if they wanted to receive additional direction from the Directors. Mr. Streed advised there were some changes on the fee ordinance that would be introduced at the April board meeting for the first reading that would be covered later in the evening. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources, updated the Committee on the recruitments for the Director of Operations and Maintenance and the Director of Finance. Recruitment for the Director of Operations and Maintenance should be concluded within the next two weeks and should allow for some overlapping time for cross-training. Ms. Tomko referred to recruitment packages distributed that evening for the Director of Finance position that will be utilized, and it is hoped the position will be filled prior to Gary Streed's retirement. (8) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS &ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Carol Beekman, Director of Communications & Administrative Services, updated the Directors on the activities and accomplishments for the past quarter on the Communications and Administrative Services Strategic Plan for FY 2004/05 (Agenda Item No. 12(a)). Ms. Beekman advised the department would be renamed the Public Affairs Office effective July 2005, and the next update and a new Public Affairs Strategic Plan for FY 2005/06 would be provided at the July meeting. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 3 March 9, 2005 (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL Brad Hogin, General Counsel, provided an update on the SAWPA dispute. The negotiating team has successfully negotiated a memorandum of understanding that has been approved by SAWPA's board and has authorized dismissal of their lawsuit. (10) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. Approve minutes of the March 9, 2005, Finance,Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting. b. FAHR05-21 Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 2005. The Treasurer's Report will be distributed at the FAHR Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports reviewed within 30 days of month end. C. FAHR05-22 Receive and file Certificates of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. d. FAHR05-23 Receive and file Employment Status Report as of March 23, 2005. e. FAHR05-24 Receive and file OSHA Incidence Rates and Workers' Compensation Claims and Costs Report. f. FAHR05-25 Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD05- _, Adopting Policies and Procedures for the District's Records Management Program, Records Retention, and Destruction of Obsolete Records, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 04-07. g. FAHR05-26 Receive and file update on Health Insurance Benefit Program for FY05/06 (information only). h. FAHR05-27 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager to issue a purchase order contract to Dharma Consulting to provide continuing professional services to assist executive and senior staff with ongoing strategic planning, executive management team coaching and team development; and staff team building,for a monthly amount not to exceed $15,000, for up to 12 months, for a total amount not to exceed $180,000. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 10(a)through (h) under Consent Calendar. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 March 9, 2005 (11) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR05-28 Recommend to the Board of Directors the approval of new non-residential user fee codes for Laundromats and Nightclubs, and set the user fee rates equivalent to 1,800 percent and 200 percent of the Single-Family Residential Rate per 1,000 Square Feet, respectively; and adjust the user fee rate for Motels downward from 97 percent to 70 percent of the Single- Family Residence rate per 1,000 square feet. Mike White, Controller, provided a brief report on new non-residential user fees for Laundromats, Nightclubs and Motels. He also discussed reducing rates to single-family residence owners for low-income or low- usage. Staff believes that the additional costs to implement, monitor and administer a program for low-usage out weighs the positive benefits of the program. A low-income program would be contrary to California law as our fees must be related to use. MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. FAHR05-29 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize and implement the Sanitary Sewer Service User Fee Schedule for FY 2005/06, based upon an annual Single-Family Residential user fee of$132.00. This fee must be enacted by Ordinance and approved by a 2/3 vote of all Directors Gary Streed, Director of Finance, reviewed briefly the five-year sewer user fee plan that was adopted in 2003, and referred to staffs evaluation on other alternatives contained within the staff report. He briefly reviewed the cash flow projections contained in the report. A motion was made and seconded to authorize and implement the Sanitary Sewer Service User Fee Schedule for FY 2005/06, based upon an annual Single-Family Residential user fee of$132. Directors entered into discussion debating the pros and cons of steeply increasing the rates from 15% to 30% for FY 2005/06, or considering raising the rates more steadily. A substitute motion was made to increase the user fees to $151, approximately 30%, for FY 2005/06, as publicly noticed in 2003. Directors discussed the likeliness of the Board of Directors approving such a steep increase based on actions taken the prior year. The substitute motion failed for lack of a second. Another substitute motion was made to increase the user fees 15% per year for each of the next five years. The substitute motion failed for lack of a second. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 March 9, 2005 Additional discussion ensued, and Directors were advised that the user fees could not have another five-year plan added to it without a formal public notice. The General Manager also advised that last year a multi- year recommendation was proposed and was not well received by the Board of Directors. There was a call for the question to consider staffs recommendation, to authorize and implement the Sanitary Sewer Service User Fee Schedule for FY 2005/06, based upon an annual Single-Family Residential user fee of$132.00. The motion was approved by a vote of 7 ayes and 1 opposed. C. FAHR05-30 Approve a consulting service agreement for External Financial Auditing Services, Specification No. CS-2005-217, with Conrad &Associates for a five-year period beginning with the audit of the financial statements for FY 2004-05, at the following maximum annual fees: FY 2004-05 $46,550 FY 2005-06 47,795 FY 2006-07 49,040 FY 2007-08 50,315 FY 2008-09 51,590 Mike White provided a brief report, and requested the recommendation be stated more clearly with regard to the annual costs and payment of said costs, as follows: FY Year FY of Auditing Maximum Being Audited Services Contract Annual Fees FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 $46,550 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 47,795 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 49,040 FY 2007-08 FY 2008-09 50,315 FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 51,590 MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors, as modified. (12) INFORMATION PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR05-31 Communications and Administrative Services Strategic Plan FY 2004-05/Quarterly Update This report was provided under the Director of Communications and Administrative Services Report (Item 8). b. FAHR05-32 Biosolids Update This report was provided under the Report of General Manager(Item 5). Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 March 9, 2005 Additional discussion ensued, and Directors were advised that the user fees could not have another five-year plan added to it without a formal public notice. The General Manager also advised that last year a multi- year recommendation was proposed and was not well received by the Board of Directors. There was a call for the question to consider staffs recommendation, to authorize and implement the Sanitary Sewer Service User Fee Schedule for FY 2005/06, based upon an annual Single-Family Residential user fee of$132.00. The motion was approved by a vote of 7 ayes and 1 opposed. C. FAHR05-30 Approve a consulting service agreement for External Financial Auditing Services, Specification No. CS-2005-217, with Conrad &Associates for a five-year period beginning with the audit of the financial statements for FY 2004-05, at the following maximum annual fees: FY 2004-05 $46,550 FY 2005-06 47,795 FY 2006-07 49,040 FY 2007-08 50,315 FY 2008-09 51,590 Mike White provided a brief report, and requested the recommendation be stated more clearly with regard to the annual costs and payment of said costs, as follows: FY Year FY of Auditing Maximum Being Audited Services Contract Annual Fees FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 $46,550 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 47,795 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 49,040 FY 2007-08 FY 2008-09 50,315 FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 51,590 MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors, as modified. (12) INFORMATION PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR05-31 Communications and Administrative Services Strategic Plan FY 2004-05/Quarterly Update This report was provided under the Director of Communications and Administrative Services Report (Item 8). b. FAHR05-32 Biosolids Update This report was provided under the Report of General Manager(Item 5). Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 March 9, 2005 Additional discussion ensued, and Directors were advised that the user fees could not have another five-year plan added to it without a formal public notice. The General Manager also advised that last year a multi- year recommendation was proposed and was not well received by the Board of Directors. There was a call for the question to consider staffs recommendation, to authorize and implement the Sanitary Sewer Service User Fee Schedule for FY 2005/06, based upon an annual Single-Family Residential user fee of$132.00. The motion was approved by a vote of 7 ayes and 1 opposed. C. FAHR05-30 Approve a consulting service agreement for External Financial Auditing Services, Specification No. CS-2005-217, with Conrad &Associates for a five-year period beginning with the audit of the financial statements for FY 2004-05, at the following maximum annual fees: FY 2004-05 $46,550 FY 2005-06 47,795 FY 2006-07 49,040 FY 2007-08 50,315 FY 2008-09 51,590 Mike White provided a brief report, and requested the recommendation be stated more clearly with regard to the annual costs and payment of said costs, as follows: FY Year FY of Auditing Maximum Being Audited Services Contract Annual Fees FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 $46,550 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 47,795 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 49,040 FY 2007-08 FY 2008-09 50,315 FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 51,590 MOTION: It was moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors, as modified. (12) INFORMATION PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR05-31 Communications and Administrative Services Strategic Plan FY 2004-05/Quarterly Update This report was provided under the Director of Communications and Administrative Services Report (Item 8). b. FAHR05-32 Biosolids Update This report was provided under the Report of General Manager(Item 5). Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 6 March 9, 2005 C. FAHR05-33 Staffing and Organizational Proposals for FY 05/06. Blake Anderson, General Manager, briefed the Directors on events that have impacted current staffing levels and organizational structure since the Board of Directors adopted a comprehensive strategic plan and Environmental Impact Report in 1999. He assured the Directors that staff has made every effort to pay adhere to the unifying strategies adopted by the Board of Directors in 2003. Gary Streed, Director of Finance, provided the Directors an overview of organizational structure changes, staffing and salaries, which would include an increase of 15 new full time employees and 29 reclassifications and transfers. It was noted that the salary budget would increase 9.3%, for a total salary budget of approximately $6 million, including these proposals. d. FAHR05-34 Employee Benefits Program Overview Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources, reported employees receive a very competitive benefit package, and staff is consistently looking for opportunities to control costs. She reviewed the overall benefits package, which is fairly consistent among the various employee bargaining units. In the past three years, the District has experienced a turn-over rate of only 3.9%. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (15) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for May 11, 2005 at 5 p.m. (16) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:29 p.m. Submitted by: /_Z� )/�' k;,( - Penny M. le FAHR Co mittee Secr4 ry H:ldeptlagenda\FAHR1FAHR2005104051041305 FAHR Minutes.doc STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 1. N Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, 1 hereby certify that the Notice and Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting of Orange County Sanitation District to be held on6LA;z , 2005, was duly posted for public inspection in the main lobby of the Districts' offices on a- / , 2005. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 2A::�_-Z 2005. Penny M. Kyle, Igecretary Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District HADEPT\ADIVIU (FORMS\AGENDA CERTIFICATION.DOC J SIN/fA)'Oyoi P ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 4 90 FCY fX April 20, 2005 phone: Penny Kyle (2 copies no label) (714)962-241 1 To the Chair and Members Board Secretary fax: (714)962-0356 of the Board of Directors www.ocsd.com mailing address: Subject: Board Letter P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley.CA 92728-8127 The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional Street address: information on any of the items, please call me. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley.CA 92708-7018 Chair and Vice Chair Lobby D.C. Member Chairman Steve Anderson and Vice Chairman Jim Ferryman Agencies attended the CASA meeting in Washington D.C. April 4-6. At - - the meeting they participated in panel discussions with the key Cities counsels and staff to the House and Senate committees with Anaheim jurisdiction over the Clean Water Act. Brea Buena Park In addition, Chair Anderson introduced Rep. Gary Miller at the Cypress CASA closingbreakfast. Re Miller stated in his speech how important it is to Fountain Valley P P P Fullerton provide strong federal support for projects like the Sanitation District's secondary Garden Grove treatment upgrade program. Huntington Beach Irvine La Habra The Chair and Vice Chair had two important meetings to discuss the Sanitation La Palma Los Alamitos District STAG request. The first was with Frank Cushing, Clerk and Staff Director for Newport Beach Chairman Jerry Lewis to discuss the importance of the funding request. The second Orange meeting was with Christopher Minakowski, Legislative Assistant, and Office of Placentia Santa Ana Representative Rohrabacher. Both meetings went extraordinarily well. Seal Beach Stanton Results of Telephone Survey of High Propensity Voters on the Groundwater Tustin Villa Park Replenishment System Yorba Linda In late March, Voter/Consumer research, a national survey research firm, conducted County of Orange a survey of 500 high-propensity voters concerning the Groundwater Replenishment System awareness and support. High-propensity voters are voters who have voted Sanitary Districts in 3 of the last 4 elections. The sample was taken from the Orange County Water Costa Mesa District (OCWD) and Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) service area and is Midway City representative of all high-propensity voters in our service areas. The survey was funded as part of this year's GWR System budgeted and approved outreach Water Districts program. This was the fourth survey on the project in the past eight years and this Irvine Ranch one will be to help develop an outreach strategy for the next two years until the project is turned on. The results of the survey were very positive and encouraging. Io maintain world-class leadership in wastewater and water resource management. 4�JM,+ SAKI � oy W O i s � o Board of Directors Page 2 April 20, 2005 Here are some highlights from the survey: - 40% of the respondents were aware of the project. 59% were unaware. - 77% of the respondents aware of the project were supportive. - Respondents preferred the GWR System over other alternatives, including ocean desalination. - If the project went on line, 76% would not change the way they use water - Our key messages seem to be effective, respondents found them to be convincing. - 4% of the respondents have attended a presentation about water in the past year. While support for the project has grown significantly, awareness has remained fairly constant at 40%. To give you a point of reference, in 1997 Lawrence Research also surveyed voters and at that time, 13% were aware of the project and favored and 5% were aware and opposed the project, while 75% were unaware of the project. So since 1997, awareness has grown from 18% and leveled off at 40% and support has continued to grow to 76% from 13% - a significant improvement. It appears out outreach to the leadership of Orange County is working. Kern County Grand Jury Investigates Biosolids For the past five months, the Kern County Grand Jury has been investigating the use of biosolids on farm land in Kern County. This investigation was initiated due to concerns regarding the use of biosolids on farmland overlying the Kern Water Bank and local aquifers. The Grand Jury also stated that the importation of biosolids is also of concern to the residents of Kern County. The Grand Jury report recommends that Kern County implement a complete and outright ban of all classes of biosolids until scientific testing proves that usage of biosolids poses no health threat to either animals or humans. Should it be determined that an outright ban on land applications of biosolids is not possible, the Grand Jury recommends implementing numerous additional requirements that would make the beneficial use of biosolids in Kern County practically impossible. The Kern County Grand Jury final report on biosolids can be accessed at www.co.kern.ca.us/grandjurv. As I read the report, I must wonder out loud whether there was a fair vetting of both sides of the argument. Frankly, the overwhelming amount of science appears to be on our side on this issue. Orange County Health Care Agency and Restaurant Fats, Oils, and Grease Inspections Members of the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) Steering Committee have been in discussion with the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) to explore using OCHCA's environmental health specialists to inspect restaurant kitchens during the course of their work. Based on meetings with OCHCA, the proposed program will provide one FOG inspection per year for each food service establishment (FSE) normally visited three times a year by OCHCA. Some 5800 FSEs are covered in the 16 jurisdictions that plan to participate in the program. `OJayy $ 4I)�))Oh O ti i T" ° Board of Directors Page 3 April 20, 2005 The cost of the program will be about $300,000 for the first year, and the 16 co- permittees have agreed to divide the cost by population initially. Staff is working with General Counsel to finalize the agreements that are necessary to implement the program and will keep you informed of developments. FOG Control Program Tracking Matrix In response to an inquiry by the Board of Directors, staff put together a tracking system for FOG Control Program fees. Staff has developed a Tracking Matrix and gathered responses from many of the WDR co-permittees. If you are interested in the results, please contact Mark Kawamoto, Engineer, Source Control Division for a copy. He can be reached at (714) 593-7424 or kawamoto cQocsd.com. California Infrastructure Coalition Releases Annual Report The California Infrastructure Coalition (CIC) has released its 2004 Annual Report. The enclosed report illustrates CIC's efforts to increase vital funding for California's highways, roadways, bridges, water and wastewater systems, libraries, parks and schools. The CIC looks to make great progress in 2005 as it continues to build support for dedicated and consistent sources of funding for infrastructure. Please take a few minutes to look over the enclosed report. If your city is currently not a member of the Coalition and is interested in joining, please call CIC at (916) 442-5000 which shares offices with the League of Cities. Chris McKenzie is Chairman, California Infrastructure Coalition and Executive Director of League of California Cities. Disadvantaged Business Program Webpage The Sanitation District has launched its Disadvantaged Business Program webpage on the agency's internet website at www.ocsd.com/services/business/bep/default.asp. The Disadvantaged Business webpage was developed by Sanitation District staff as a mechanism to support a procurement based requirement that accompanies federal grant agreements. Upon accepting federal funds, the Sanitation District commits itself contractually to follow all rules, regulations and policies that govern federal grant awards. This particular requirement obligates the Sanitation District to make ''good faith efforts' of contracting with Minority-owned and Women-owned Business Enterprises and Labor Surplus Firms for the Secondary Treatment Project that is funded with money from the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA) State and Tribal Assistance Grant. In order to meet all provisions of the requirement, Sanitation District staff has implemented a Disadvantaged Business Program, of which the webpage is only one component. Sanitation District staff believes a Disadvantaged Business webpage will be an effective and efficient way to outreach to prospective disadvantaged vendors because the internet reaches a broad audience through an objective forum, and a webpage is easy to modify and maintain. The Sanitation District is also pursuing other methods of soliciting disadvantaged businesses by adding these businesses to . 4�JNtr SAN IT,T/oN W � � U i = 9 oaf i "` T" Board of Directors Page 4 April 20, 2005 the Sanitation District vendors' database and solicitation lists and by attending small business outreach events. The Sanitation District will be responsible for demonstrating to the USEPA that the agency has made adequate attempts to procure a certain percentage of contracts with disadvantaged vendors. The Sanitation District will be required to report on these contracts to the USEPA, add the requirement into primary contractor's contracts for secondary treatment construction, and ensure that primary contractors are complying with the requirement. The Disadvantaged Business Webpage is one of the first steps in proactively meeting this federal requirement. Huell Howser and California Green In January 2005, in conjunction with MWD, the Los Angeles County Sanitations Districts and SCE, began sponsoring Huell Howser's California Green, a TV series that highlights innovative environmental programs and projects throughout California. The series features topics such as native plants, tire recycling, and natural building materials. A new episode airs every month and is then repeated throughout the season. You can catch the next episode, which discusses computer recycling, on Wednesday, April 27, at 6:00 p.m., and again on Friday, May 13, at 6:00 p.m. on KCET, Channel 28. To view the schedule of show times, visit http://www.calgold.com/Showtimes.asi). Wastewater Permits: State Law Requires Consideration of Economic Factors On April 4, 2005, the California Supreme Court issued its opinion in the case of City of Burbank v. State Water Resources Control Board. The case involved the issuance of wastewater permits to the cities of Burbank and Los Angeles in 1998. One of the primary issues presented in the case was whether a regional water quality control board must take into account the economic costs of complying before including restrictions in wastewater permits. In its decision, the California Supreme Court stated that both California law and federal law require regional water quality control boards to comply with federal clean water standards. In the event a regional board imposes pollutant restrictions more stringent than those required by federal law, California law requires the regional board to take into account economic factors, including the facility's cost of compliance with those restrictions. The Court ordered that the case be remanded to the trial court to determine whether any of the limitations in the permits are "more stringent" than those required under federal law. If so, such restrictions should be subject to "economic considerations" by the board before inclusion in the permits. This case gave each side a limited victory since Regional Boards will be required to consider economics and other factors under some conditions. This decision is not expected to impact the District's next ocean discharge permit renewal process as the California Ocean Plan contains comprehensive numeric objectives that are used to provide effluent limits for the permit. To date, stormwater permits in California have been based on best management practices and not effluent limits. There is no SAMI) ,Oy r cr/NC THE ° Board of Directors Page 5 April 20, 2005 reason to believe that this decision will change that practice. As the California Ocean Plan has already considered economics during its adoption, the Regional Board would not consider it necessary to consider individual costs for the District if new effluent limits were adopted during the next permit cycle. Sanitation District Has A Compost Give-away Day As part of Orange County Sanitation District's ongoing efforts to promote the in- county use of our biosolids-based compost products, we hosted a successful, second annual compost give-away on St. Patrick's Day. The Sanitation District staff, Board of Directors, and member agencies were invited to the event at Plant No. 2 where Synagro provided 100 cubic yards of compost from their Corona facility. The City of Tustin staff stopped in for a few yards of compost. The publicity of the event raised the interest of the Huntington Beach Tree Foundation. Synagro will be working with the Foundation to provide compost for local charity events. Approximately 50 Sanitation District staff stopped in for some free compost. Gardener Bob Ooten and his wife Cheryl offered a workshop on making cactus gardens. The Biosolids staff took 20 lucky Sanitation District staff on an educational tour of the Corona compost facility. The Sanitation District Biosolids staff and Synagro staff are continuing to work with our member cities and sanitation districts to promote the Member Agency Compost Use Program. Meetings are being set up with member agencies' staffs to discuss the compost program. Public Outreach and Education Children's Water Festival April 4-5 The Sanitation District's "Wastewater Survivor" obstacle course, in its fifth year running, is still touted as one of the best booths at the ninth annual Children's Water Festival held at Hidden Valley Park in Irvine. Even Huell Howser dropped by to capture the action for his "California's Green" show which aired on April 24, 7 p.m. and again on May 9, 6 p.m. on KCET. Over 600 fourth and fifth graders enthusiastically flowed through the four steps of the wastewater treatment process simulated in the "Wastewater Survivor' game and were tested on water trivia questions. This year, more than 6,000 students and teachers from 21 schools in Orange County attended the two-day event. Without the help of the Sanitation District's dedicated team of volunteers (20 of them who worked a total of 162 hours) it would not be possible to stage this type of educational program. The Sanitation District was also a "Crystalline Lake" sponsor of the festival with a contribution of$2,500. Earth Day April 16 35 years have passed since the first Earth Day event was held in 1970, the significance of which spawned the Environmental Protection Agency, the Clean Water Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act. Seven OCSD volunteers hosted an sAxIr,ror, � o U � 2 i • 9 2 r" Board of Directors Page 6 April 20, 2005 information booth at University of California, Irvine on April 16. The Earth Day event was held in conjunction with UCI's Open House and Wayzgoose Festival and provided an excellent opportunity to talk to students and their parents about environmental issues facing Orange County and promote career/internship opportunities in wastewater related fields. Orange County Science and Engineering Fair(OCSEF) April 27 The Sanitation District is sponsoring two Environmental Stewardship Awards at the OCSEF held on April 27 at the Orange County Fairgrounds. The awards are open to projects aimed at improving the quality of life through improvement of water quality, water resources management, watershed protection or water and wastewater treatment. The goal is to reward innovative young thinkers and raise student and teacher awareness of career opportunities in wastewater related fields. A number of Sanitation District staff will assist as judges in the Sanitation District's category as well as the more general categories. Sewer Science Program Launched The first two classes of this new program where conducted March 21-25 at Edison High School in Huntington Beach. A total of 63 senior advance placement environmental science students participated. Feedback from students was very positive. The hands-on water quality tests and learning about internships and careers from OCSD staff is what they enjoyed most. The teacher gave program a "Y rating (5 = BEST) noting "real science" being applied in the classroom and career information as a valuable learning tool. Eight employees participated in the "in-class" program as part of OCSD's Volunteer Incentive Program. Articles of Interest have also included several additional published articles that you might find interesting. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Blake P. Anderson General Manager BPA:gg H:\DEPT\ADMIN\GM\LETTERS TO THE BOARD\04\092204 BOARD LTR..DOC Attachments t{ V00Z idOd3d idnNNV uo ii ! leog aa njo na Is -ea I u I a i ua ol ! I e o � '1 l ,1r I I,, t On behalf of the Board of Directors, I am pleased to present the 2004 Annual Report of the California Infrastructure Coalition (CIC),formerly called the California Rebuild America Coalition. As you see,our name has changed this year,but our mission remains the same: to build support for dedicated and consistent sources of funding at levels sufficient to sustain California's vital infrastructure facilities and systems. Why then the change?The decision to rename our coalition was two-fold. First,as you may recall, the California Rebuild America Coalition(CaIRAC)was initially formed as a state coalition,modeled after the national Rebuild America Coalition,headquartered in Washington, D.C. Over the past several years,as CaIRAC began to emerge at the forefront of California's infrastructure debate, the national Rebuild America Coalition was fading away. Today, it is no longer in existence. Second,and more importantly,we want to have a name that underscores who we are and what we represent:California infrastructure. Our new name has also provided us new opportunities to become more involved in California's infrastructure debate and activities.The unsuccessful Proposition 53 campaign to create the 2 1"Century Infrastructure Investment Fund in 2003 demonstrated the need for an overarching infrastructure coalition that can represent the breadth and depth of the state's varied infrastructure issues. CIC is viral to increasing public awareness,influencing public policy and, ultimately,building or repairing necessary infrastructure throughout the state. 2004 has been exciting for the California Infrastructure Coalition:in order to better meet our goals and fulfill our members'needs,we literally overhauled our internal infrastructure. To more effectively communicate our efforts and foster the exchange of ideas,the California Infrastructure Coalition this past year created: • A new monthly e-newsletter called"F.ye on Infrastructure"to communicate with Coalition members and interested parties about the latest happenings in California infrastructure; • A new website—www.calinfr.istructitre.org—where our mission,our efforts and our successes are constantly updated to provide a view of the work we do and invite others to join us; • A senior-level sub-committee to support and promote the regional infrastructure report card process. In addition,we decided to raise the volume in one particular area of infrastructure: the state's sidelined transportation projects. Due to the continued diversion of earmarked fuel-tax(Prop.42) funds, this will remain a critical issue for the Coalition in 2005 as we work to find a permanent solution to fund the state's long-overdue transportation needs. The success of the California Infrastructure Coalition does not happen by itself. It is a collective effort of our members and leaders who realize the importance of repairing California's aging infrastructure and building new facilities and systems for generations to come. 2005 offers California and the California Infrastructure Coalition many challenges and important opportunities. I thank you for your interest in improving California's infrastructure and look forward to your continued involvement with the California Infrastructure Coalition as we work together to increase infrastructure funding in the Golden State. Best regards, Chris McKenzie Chairman,California Infrastructure Coalition Executive Director, League of Califonria Cities f As part of the California Infrastructure Coalition's commitment to Highways. Roadways. increase the awareness of our states infrastructure needs and build support Bridges. Water. Sewers. for the funding,development and implementation of policies that will Libraries. Parks. Schools. result in well-maintained and safe infrastructure facilities, CIC focused Reservoirs. These systems on the following areas within the infrastructure dialogue in 2004: and facilities make up the vast infrastructure of 0 Highlighting the Coalition's mission and membership to maximize q California and provide the awareness of infrastructure funding need; stability that enables our quality of life and economic n Safeguarding new and existing infrastructure funds, including health to prosper. Proposition 42-generated fuel tax and gaming compact funding; California's infrastructure f Establishing new communications vehicles to maximize the dialogue has served as the foundation between Coalition members,policy makers and stakeholders. upon which one of the world's largest and strongest economies was built.Yet, much of our infrastructure is outdated and overburdened and will not meet the needs of the projected population growth. Unless the right steps are taken today,California will not be C a I R A C BECOMES T N E CALIFORNIA able to meet the needs of tomorrow. INFRASTRUCTURE COALITION Spending for infrastructure projects in California has dramatically As the national Rebuild America Coalition ceased operations, the Cali- and systematically decreased over the past few decades. In the 1960's, fornia arm remained strong, active and growing. The time was right to public works and infrastructure projects constituted nearly 20 percent call attention to our Coalition. But more than a rebranding effort, the of state spending.Today it's closer to 3 percent. Despite sensational popula- transition to the California Infrastructure Lion growth during the past four decades, the lack of planning for this Coalition afforded us the opportunity to increase is taking a toll and placing a tremendous burden on California's create a focused undertaking for Califor- aging infrastructure systems and facilities. nia—to raise the infrastructure debate, to showcase how infrastructure is part of ongoing crises such as health and public safety,and to demonstrate how deteriorating infrastructure will erode our economy and quality of life.With a fresh focus,an ex- panded membership and resources to lend credibility and attention to the issue,CIC was and remains poised to make an impact. COMMUNICATING CALIFORNIA'S INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS: EYE ON INFRASTRUCTURE In 2004, the Coalition created a monthly newsletter,Eye on Infrastructure, J.- to communicate with its members, policy makers and stakeholders.Eye on Infrastructure provides timely information and insight into the state's 1� varied infrastructure issues and offers CIC members a vehicle through which all members can learn and share what each is doing in their Nam respective infrastructure arena. 2004 issues included: ® Guest columns by members of the California Legislature and Coalition members; A_ e A special November election edition, which featured a voting guide with recommendations based on the Board of Directors' positions on state and local ballot measures; e Timely studies and reports; o News briefs; CREATING A RESOURCE ON CALIFORNIA'S INFRASTRUCTURE Key legislative actions; NEEDS: WWW.CALINFRASTRUCTURE.ORG a News about member organizations' progress on a variety of The California Infrastructure Coalition homepage continues to be a infrastructure issues. resource and destination for anyone interested in learning about our states infrastructure needs.The website provides well-crafted materials that were developed during its time as the California Rebuild American ' Coalition (CaIRAC) as well as CIC's new monthly newsletter, F.ye onInfirutructzcre In addition,wwwcalinfrastructure.org provides: lr, e Slnla end Lo = ICa"lOmlo InUaslwU'•,a Links to all member organizations; M1 - , Related infrastructure websites; p � P Regional infrastructure report ort card results; Reports about the state of infrastructure in California. `7a, i �s , CHAMPIONING NEW INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING SOURCES: NO ON PROPOSITIONS 68 & 70 lipmf. _- 'Ii1 advocatc and influence public policy regarding infrastructure,the CIC strongly supported Governor Arnold Schwarneneggers gaining agreements with several California Indian tribes that included more than$1 billion in guaranteed bonds dedicated to long-neglected transportation projects. The CIC took a public position to oppose Propositions 68 and 70, which, if enacted, would have made the Governor's agreements null and void and with it the much-needed bond funding element.With the support of the CIC, Propositions 68 and 70 were defeated and $1 billion promised for transportation projects remains a viable opportunity.* (*$I billion bond is currently on hold pending the outcome of a legal challenge.) CIC SPECIAL REPORT: RESTORATION OF TRANSPORTATION FUNDING: GOOD NEWS FOR CALIFORNIA'S ECONOMY AND BUSINESS CLIMATE 'Investment in California's transportation is a raise investment in the ECONOMICPOTENTIAL TRANSPORTATION state's infrastructure and its economy that will pay enormous dividends jDQLLARS IN MILLIONS UNLESS NOTED) today and for generations to come. Not only will increased transportation spending rebuild a decaying infrastructure that is in desperate need of IMPACTS DIRECT INDIRECT INDUCED TOTAL renewal, it will create jobs in California and encourage vital business - - - _- � n p 52.5 Billion Level investment to ignite the states economic recove7y. Output S2,157 5831 51,269 $4,257 Bill Hauck,President,California Business Roundtable; Employment 25,384 6,560 12,668 44,611 Vice Chair,California Infrastructure Coalition Value Added S1,955 S256 S388 S2,394 Employee Compensation 5955 S256 S388 S1,599 S2.0 Billion Level Commissioned by the California Business Roundtable in partnership output SI,726 S665 S1,015 $3,407 with the California Alliance for jobs and Transportation California, Employment 20,313 5,249 10,137 35,700 Value Added S939 S376 S600 S1,916 the California Infrastructure Coalition issued the landmark report Employee Compensation S764 S205 S311 S1,280 that unequivocally linked restoration of transportation funding to SI.5 Billion Level California's economy and business climate. The report provided Output S1,294 S499 $761 s2,554 roof positive of the critical economic benefits of maintaining and Employment 15,228 S704 S282 S450 $1,436 764 p P g Value Added $104 5262 S450 $1,436 improving California's$2 trillion transportation infrastructure. Employee Compensation $573 S154 S233 $959 S1.0 Billion Level As the report detailed, key economic impacts of increased funding Output S864 S333 S508 S1,705 Employment 10,165 2,628 5,073 17,866 for California's transportation infrastructure include: Value added S470 S188 S300 5959 Employee Compensation S382 S103 5156 S640 For every state dollar spent on transportation projects, the state SO-5 Billion Level would see an additional $.97 in indirect and induced spending Employment 5utput 071 ,311 ,531 ,91S852 (J in the economy-many of these additional transactions result Value Added S235 S94 5150 S478Employee Compensation $191 $51 $78 S319 in sales tax revenues and additional income for taxpayers in the state,creating additional revenue not only for the state but for local governments as well; f i t Every one billion dollars of transportation of methodologies,organization of data gathering and evaluation of the spending in California creates approximately data for each report card. Equally important,Coalition members have 18,000 new jobs in the state; facilitated communication efforts aimed at providing a larger voice to the public and to leaders who can affect a positive change for infrastructure. Project expenditures will improve the state's transportation infrastructure and business Building on the past successes of the Orange and Los Angeles Counties' environment resulting in ongoing general report cards, we look forward to the 2005 results of the Inland Empire economic benefit. and Bay Area report card efforts. r Furthermore, the report highlighted the fact that restoring California's transportation funding substantially increases employment and spending, INFRASTRUCTURE COALrnom ultimately impacting a wide variety of sectors in the California economy. Investment in transportation brings jobs to California and encourages _ N The California Infrastructure vital business investment that creates permanent economic benefits to _ Coalition includes members from the state. ,� ':fit' all regions of the state who want l «� f to make rebuilding California's This report was a significant accomplishment,as it provided an economic infrastructure systems and facilities snapshot of the importance of a healthy statewide transportation infra- a top priority. structure system. The California Infrastructure Coalition, formerly known as REGIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARDS: the California Rebuild America ASSESSING CALIFORNIA'S REGIONAL NEEDS Coalition (Ca1RAC), isanon- profit, broad-based organization Regional infrastructure report cards continued to be a major priority for whose mission is to build support for dedicated and consistent sources CIC in 2004. By supporting local and regional efforts across California, of funding sufficient to sustain California's vital infrastructure facilities led by California chapters of the American Society of Civil Engineers and systems. and the American Public Works Association,the Coalition continues to = bring greater awareness of local infrastructure priorities to a statewide The California Infrastructure Coalition r+ c audience. Through media relations and public affairs, the Coalition membership includes California cities, gives local infrastructure issues a louder voice by pinpointing trends, counties,special districts and other regional i issues and commonalities of regions throughout the state. organizations,corporations and other non- profit associations that represent all who are The report card process encourages cities,counties,business organizations, impacted by infrastructure investment policy. universities and engineering organizations to come together to highlight infrastructure needs. In 2004, Coalition staff continued to provide guidance, feedback and support to regions throughout the state. CIC members remained active in leading the efforts through the development While our membership CIC's ambitious agenda for 2005 includes: continues to grow,we still have room at the table for a Establishing a Legislative Score Card to hold policy and lawmakers those who want to see a accountable for the votes that directly impact infrastructure funding better and more prosperous and investment; California. You can become • _ � � involved in building support Impacting public policy debates through the regional report card f - t for adequate infrastructure process and publication of results to a broader audience; _ funding by joining CIC. Your membership enables the Expanding the Eye onInfrnstrzicture e-newsletter to include action Coalition to create,share and alerts to coalition members and special guest columns that feature use the communication tools insider information for subscribers; necessary to build support for infrastructure investment. 0 Raising the volume in the debate about transportation funding mechanisms; As a member,we encourage you to get involved in Coalition activities at the regional level to bring the infrastructure message to key decision C Exploring new communications forums and vehicles to advocate makers, the media and the public. Members benefit from current, CIC's mission to secure dedicated and consistent funding comprehensive infrastructure news and are the first to receive the public for infrastructure. information tools created by CIC. They also influence the Coalition's agenda and are recognized in CIC correspondence and activities with The California Infrastructure Coalition is committed to becoming the the public, policy makers and the media. preeminent source on Californias infrastructure issues for elected officials, the media and the public. Working at the state For more information about joining the California Infrastructure level,we will continue the dialogue with the Coalition or to share your views with other Coalition members, Legislative and Executive branches,public policy please contact info@calinfrastructure.org. makers and opinion leaders. Through our regional efforts,we will generate support and the need for action directed at moving public 'n LOOKING AHEAD opinion and influencing policy decisions at both the state and local levels. The work of the California Infrastructure Coalition is more important trr+ than ever. In 2005, the Coalition will continue to raise awareness We look forward to working in partnership about the deteriorating state of our infrastructure facilities and systems with you to improve the economic vitality and the urgent need for investment in its maintenance, upgrades and and quality of life for all Californians. construction—especially in tough budgetary times. O L111' American Public Works Assoc.,California Council City of Laguna Niguel E.J. De La Rosa&Co. American Public Works Assoc.,Northern California Chapter City of Long Beach GBA Master Series American Public Works Assoc.,Sacramento Chapter City of Los Angeles Geo-Environ mental American Public Works Assoc.,South Bay Chapter City of Mission Viejo Harris&Associates American Public Works Assoc.,Southern California Chapter City of Monrovia Holmes&Narver American Society of Civil Engineers,California Sections City of Monterey Lamont Financial Services Corporation Associated General Contractors City of Sacramento Mark Thomas&Co. Association of California Water Agencies City of San Diego MNS Engineers California Alliance for Jobs City of San Fernando Montgomery Watson Harza California Building Industry Association City of San Juan Capistrano Parsons Corporation—California Operations California Business Roundtable City of Santa Ana Psomas California School Boards Association City of Santa Fe Springs R.W. Beck California Society of Civil Engineers City of Santa Rosa RBF Consulting California Special Districts Association City of Torrance Sierra West Group California State Association of Counties City of Tustin Stone&Youngberg LLC Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California City of Vacaville Tetra Tech ASL Engineering Contractors'Association City of Ventura URS Corporation Infrastructure Delivery Council City of West Hollywood Wesco Infrastructure Technologies League of California Cities City of West Sacramento Willdan City of Anaheim City of Westminster City of Arcadia City/County of San Francisco City of Burbank County of Alameda City of Carmel-by-the-Sea County of Alameda General Services Agency City of Carson County of Los Angeles City of Culver City Orange County Sanitation District City of Eureka Brown &Caldwell City of Fontana Carollo Engineers City of Glendale Carter-Burgess City of Huntington Beach David Evans and Associates City of La Quinta Dokken Engineering Y;Y,^ CALIFORNIA INFRASTRUCTUREPv ♦ COALITION 915 L STREET, #406 y SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 l` r t L. PHONE: 916/442-5000 FAX: 916/551-1384 �alifornra� 4 _ WWW.CALINFRASTRUCTURE.0RG mtrcnitucrure ;c ocrlrlron i w . Biosoifds Team (starting at left Mike Moore. Laura Rocha. • �.'�e' ,* Jamr Quests, Deirdre Hunter, and Michelle Hetherington) alongside Bob "the Cactus Gardener" Ooten and his wife, Cheryl. The gardening activity was a new addition this year to show people how to use the great compost product. An product information sheet and information on OCSD's biosolids program was also handed out to attendees. We plan to do continue these give-away events and activities in the future! One OCSD Gardener, Marian After from Accounting. submitted this picture ;44- of her beautiful garden that she grew with compost last year! Since using the . s t compost in her flower bed, she has not had to use any chemical fertilizers! 1 „ "'" �` Irk f Jt .y�• . - 7►� a l R' ,..d, fr OCSD Staff were given a opportunity to learn how their jobs related to the bigger biosolids picture by visiting Synagro's Corona Regional Composting ti Facility Synagro's Lorrie Loder provided the tour with i sump interjections by the Biosolids Team and great r questions from staff! The tour was a great success: staff really appreciated this opportunity! The Biosolids beam plan to offer this type of tour again in the future since it's a good way to educate staff on the Biosolids y EMS and dive rather updates on our Biosolids Program while providing some first-land experiences! t Member Agencies: City of Tustin ` staff took advantage of the �* giveaway tostOck-up on their compost' Meinber agencies were T�54H invited by Synagro as part of t - OCSD"s Member Use Program. The h �a... Board of Directors was also invited. • r1 _ The Huntington Beach Tree Foi1ndatE011 heard about the give- away and is working with Synagro to receive some cx>mpost fray their local charity projecis. 4i, F 1 t •;max"aC"a;-. -.... To maintain world-class leadership in wastewater and treater resource management." a 1W Homepage > Services > Business > Disadvantaged Business Program Email page Print friendly format t r '' ► , . - ; M Certification Process ' '. R Bid and Selection Process Federally Funded Projects Disadvantaged Business Program For Federally Funded QCSD Projects } t Welcome to the Orange Count Sanitation District's Y ' Disadvantaged Business web page Our goal is to provide information and assistance to Minority-owned and Women-owned Business Enterprises (MBE/WBE), and Labor - "� Surplus Area firms that are interested in bidding on contracts or P E participating as subcontractors far jobs with the Orange County Sanitation District on federally funded projects. Disadvantaged Business Program Contact k Karen Baro Id i Grant Coordinator Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 i s, Fountain Valley, CA 92728 (P) 714-593-7461 (F) 714-962-2591 { r• vow .r ,� Contact Address: Tc, Q , Sunday, April 3, 2005 CENTRAL: Pump-station site vote set Jeff Overley joverley@ocregister.com Then: January Orange County Sanitation District officials announced final alternatives for a new water-pump station set to begin construction next year. One option was on the district's property at Ellis Avenue and Euclid Street, and the remaining three were in a commercial area across the street. Now District planners, citing high real-estate costs, will recommend the pump station be built on their property. What's next The district board will vote on whether to approve the recommendation May 25. � bakersfieldcom o hftp://www.bakersfield.com/local/story/5399254p-5412568c.html Senator campaigns to get public to say no to sludge in Kern Florez launches ad, blog urging public to speak up at Tuesday board meeting By CHRISTINE BEDELL, Californian staff writer e-mail: cbedell@bakersfield.com Posted: Tuesday March 29th, 2005, 11:45 PM Last Updated: Tuesday March 29th, 2005, 11:54 PM State Sen. Dean Florez is turning to technology old and new to get the public behind a sludge-importation ban. Florez, D-Shafter, started airing radio ads this week encouraging people to show up at the Tuesday Kern County Board of Supervisors meeting where the panel will be asked to support or rebuke Florez's proposed sludge law. Florez also is launching a blog, www.stopdumpingonkern.blogspot.com, to capture community sentiment on the topic. "The Board of Supervisors can be moved by public opinion," Florez said. "Momentum in politics is everything." The current ad features a man and a woman -- Florez staffers -- talking about sludge's hazards and how awful it is to be Los Angeles' dumping ground. Florez then asks, "Can you believe our county doesn't properly test all of it for health hazards?" He says he's "tired of it." Kern County Supervisor Ray Watson called the ads "a political deal." Florez would do more good, he said, by making a few calls. "If he wanted to help solve the problem, he could pick up the phone and talk to a couple supervisors, county counsel, the (county) Resource Management Agency and say, 'How can I help you?"' Sewage sludge is a mix of treated human and industrial waste spread as fertilizer for nonedible crops. Kern County only allows a highly treated form of the material. Florez would like to ban the transportation of biosolids over county lines to stop the nearly half-million tons of sludge trucked into Kern from Southern California annually. He's worried about environmental contamination, especially of groundwater. Watson said an importation ban would violate the commerce clause of the Constitution. He said he'd like to see statewide regulation of sludge that "is defensible" in court but as for Florez's bill, he's just seen a "framework." He said sludge is tested before it gets to Kern and afterward, officials monitor wells for signs of water contamination and crops to make sure the sites aren't "overloaded." Florez plans to spend about $15,000 in his own campaign funds on the current and future ads. The current ones will run until Monday on several radio stations. Future ads will feature people talking about what it's like living near sludge-application sites and scientists detailing the health risks, he said. Florez said the supervisors meeting is a pivotal day for his bill. If the board doesn't back him, he said, he'll tell state lawmakers he's having to act. But if the supervisors agree a ban is needed and pursue a county ordinance, Florez said, his bill won't be needed. ° ° CALNONW A MM119#0SAWAMN ARWS 925 L Street, Suite 1400 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916)446-0388 s April 7, 2005 TO: CASA MEMBER AGENCIES CASA ATTORNEYS FROM: Bobbi Larson SUBJECT: LEGAL UPDATE Decisions were issued in two important cases this week in which CASA played an active role. The decisions are summarized below. 1. COURT OF APPEAL RULES KERN COUNTY BIOSOLIDS ORDINANCE DID NOT COMPLY WITH CEOA On April 1, 2005, the Fifth District Court of Appeal held that Kern County was required to prepare an environmental impact report(EIR) before adopting an ordinance banning land application of Class B biosolids. County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County, et. al v. County of Kern, 2005 WAR 3974, April 1, 2005.) The Court reversed the trial court, which had found the County's issuance of a negative declaration to be adequate under the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). CASA, along with five other petitioners, challenged the ordinance, arguing that the County failed to evaluate potentially significant environmental impacts that would occur as a result of restricting biosolids management options in the County. In its unanimous opinion, the Court noted that an EIR is required whenever there is a "fair argument"that an action will result in potrentially significant environmental effects. CEQA "sets a low threshold for the required preparation of an EIR. Here, the evidence in the administrative record establishes a reasonable possibility that the ordinance will have both positive and adverse impacts on the environment in Kern County and other areas of California,principally because alternative methods of disposal must be implemented. The positive effects of a project do not absolve the public agency from the responsibility of preparing an EIR to analyze the potentially significant negative environmental effects of the project,because those negative effects might be reduced through the adoption of feasible alternatives or mitigation measures analyzed in the EIR. Therefore, County was required to prepare an EIR. Ensuring Clean Water for California Legal Update April 7, 2005 Page 2 The Court also agreed with petitioners that the biosolids impact fee violates statutory provisions prohibiting imposition of local fees for road use. (Vehicle Code section 9400.8.) The Court found that road repair and maintenance was the primary,but not exclusive,purpose of the impact fee, and therefore the fee was invalid to the extent that the funds generated are applied to road repair and maintenance. The petitioners also challenged the ordinance on constitutional grounds, arguing that the ordinance violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The Court of Appeal disagreed: "We hold also that plaintiffs have failed to show that the ordinance discriminates against interstate commerce. We reject plaintiffs' constitutional and statutory attacks on the validity of the ordinance, except that we hold the biosolids impact fee was invalid to the extent it was a local fee for road use." The Court remanded the case with directions to the trial court to issue a writ of mandate directing Kern County to prepare an EIR for the ordinance, and for further proceedings to determine the extent to which the biosolids impact fee was a fee for road use. 2. CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT RULES THAT REGIONAL BOARDS MAY NOT CONSIDER ECONOMIC FACTORS WHEN ISSUING NPDES PERMITS EXCEPT WHERE REQUIREMENTS ARE MORE STRINGENT THAN FEDERAL LAW REQUIRES On April 4, 2005, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in the challenge brought by the Cities of Burbank and Los Angeles to discharge permits issued by the Los Angeles Regional Board. City of Burbank v. State Water Resources Control Board, 2005 DJAR 3870, April 4, 2005.) The Court ruled that neither federal nor California law allows regional boards "to consider economic factors to justify imposing pollutant restrictions that are less stringent than the applicable federal standards require." The Court also held that regional boards may consider economic factors, such as the discharger's cost of compliance,when "considering whether to make the pollutant restrictions in a wastewater discharge permit more stringent than federal law requires." CASA filed an amicus brief in support of the cities, arguing that State law requires the consideration of economics in the permitting process. The Cities operate publicly owned treatment facilities that discharge wastewater under NPDES permits issued by the Los Angeles Regional Board. In 1998, the regional board issued renewed permits that established daily maximum limitations for more than 30 pollutants to three of the Cities' facilities. The Cities appealed the permits to the State Water Resources Control Board, claiming it would be too costly to achieve the limitations, which are not necessary to protect water quality. The state board denied the appeals, and the Cities filed suit in superior court. The Cities alleged, among other Ensuring Clean Water for California Legal Update April 7, 2005 Page 3 things,the Los Angeles Regional Board violated Porter-Cologne when it failed to consider the Cities' economic burden in having to substantially reduce the pollutants in their discharged wastewater. The trial court stayed the permit limitations,but the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment. In reviewing the case, the Supreme Court considered both California and federal law. The court opined that when a regional board prescribes requirements as to the nature of any proposed discharge, Porter-Cologne requires the board to consider certain factors, including the provisions of section 13241. Porter-Cologne section 13241 provides, "[faactors to be considered by a regional board in establishing water quality objectives shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, all of the following: ... (d) Economic considerations." The Court then turned to Porter-Cologne section 13377, which"forbids a regional board's consideration of any economic hardship on the part of the permit holder if doing so would result in the dilution of the requirements set by Congress in the Clean Water Act." The Clean Water Act (CWA) prohibits the discharge of pollutants into the navigable waters of the United States unless the discharges meet federal standards. Thus, the Court observed, publicly operated wastewater treatment facilities must comply with the CWA's standards regardless of costs. Further, under the federal Constitution's supremacy clause (art. VI), a state law that conflicts with federal law is "without effect." The Court ruled that both federal law and Porter-Cologne section 13377, therefore, do not"authorize a regional board, when issuing a wastewater discharge, to use compliance costs to justify pollutant restrictions that do not comply with federal clean water standards." The Court held that whether the Los Angeles Regional Board should have considered economic factors depends on whether the Cities' permit limitations meet or exceed the CWA's requirements. Accordingly, the court remanded the case for the trial court to resolve the issue. Though the result is not what CASA had hoped, there are positive aspects of the decision. In particular, Justice Janice Brown filed a concurring opinion that summarizes many of the frustrations the regulated community feels in dealing with the current system. In addition,the Court confirmed that the unchallenged determinations of the trial court stand on such key issues as the need for narrative translators, the improper imposition of daily maximum limits, and the improper specification of a particular manner of treatment. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding either of these important cases. cc: CASA Executive Board Ensuring Clean Water for California bakersfield.com-Board backs ban on sludge Pagel of 3 � bakersfield.com �O AZO http://www.bakersfield.comAocal/story/5417247p-542623 5c.html Board backs ban on sludge Supervisors to draft all-out rule against biosolid imports By GRETCHEN WENNER, Californian staff writer e-mail: gwenner@bakersfield.com Posted: Tuesday April 5th, 2005, 11:05 PM Last Updated: Tuesday April 5th, 2005, 11:05 PM Kern County is no sludge doormat, at least not anymore. In an astonishing turnaround Tuesday morning, supervisors unanimously agreed to draft an all-out biosolids ban that would keep imported sewage out of Kern altogether. They also voted to back proposed legislation from state Sen. Dean Florez,the Shaffer Democrat,that would stop imports of sludge, or treated human and industrial sewage, across county lines. Supervisor Don Maben made the surprise request for a sludge ban. "These people still want to put the lousy stuff on our ground," Maben said after the meeting, referring to Southern California sewage districts trucking biosolids into Kern. "I've got no love for them whatsoever." During the meeting, when asking for a new rule abolishing all sludge imports into Kern, Maben referred to a lawsuit filed by Southland sewage districts against Kern for its ban of low-quality sludge. A state appeals court in Fresno issued an opinion Friday that will require Kern to draft an extensive environmental report regarding the ban. Maben, known on the board as a man of few words who doesn't waste time explaining his ruminations, launched his request in less than a minute. Maben called the districts suing Kern "the usual cast of suspects," then said: "I feel no longer do we have to respect and try to work with these people ... . "These people are tenacious," Maben said. "They have lots of money" and lots of lawyers. Maben then asked to "ban (biosolids) imports into Kern County for any purposes whatsoever." Applause filled the chambers. After some discussion, the board approved Maben's motion 4-to-O. Supervisor Barbara Patrick was absent, reportedly in Washington,D.C., seeking funding for ozone studies. http://www.bakersfield.com/local/v-print/story/5417247p-5426235c.html 4/7/2005 bakersfield.com -Board backs ban on sludge Page 2 of 3 Maben's aggressive stance against sludge was an about-face compared w views he expressed earlier this year. He said recent information,including studies showing flame retardants are turning up in human breast milk,have convinced him serious questions remain about public health risks from spreading biosolids on farmland. Kem County has become something of a statewide, if not national, ground zero in the sludge debate. Here, as elsewhere, urban centers have turned to rural regions as dumping grounds for land-applied sludge. About a third of California's biosolids end up in Kern, supervisors said,while Kern produces just 2 percent of the state's sewage. Almost all sewage from the city of Los Angeles is trucked here and applied to the so-called "Green Acres" farm that city owns on land south of Bakersfield. In addition, sewage districts in Los Angeles and Orange counties as well as the city of Oxnard also truck waste to Kern. Some 450,000 wet tons were brought here from Southland districts last year. Maben said after the meeting he wants the ban to apply to all imports,including waste that would be trucked to the new Synagro Technologies Inc. sludge composting plant being built outside Taft. Maben said Kern might as well get "the whole enchilada" if the county has to prepare an expensive environmental report anyway. County lawyers estimate the report could cost $500,000 and take up to two years to complete. In addition,they expect Southland districts to sue Kern once again over any sludge restrictions. "The generators will probably go after and attack" any environmental report the county drafts,Bernard Barmann,the county's top lawyer,told supervisors. Currently, Kern allows only the most highly treated sludge, or class A,to be spread on local farmland. The county banned lower-quality, class B sludge in the late 1990s. The Southland districts sued soon after. The litigation has been dragging on for more than five years. Maben's request also included language suggested by Supervisor Jon McQuiston calling for a range of options. McQuiston said other counties have installed strict sludge rules that essentially function as a ban. The possible ban and other alternatives will be drawn up by county staffers within 30 days,then come back to the board for a vote. Separately,the board also unanimously approved supporting Florez's proposed state Senate Bill 926. The bill would require each county to take care of its own biosolids. Florez, a frequent critic of local supervisors, showed up personally to ask for the board's support. Numerous cities around Kern have already voted to support the bill. During a lengthy discussion, Florez and the board agreed the environmental report required by the http://www.bakersfield.com/local/v-print/story/5417247p-5426235c.html 4/7/2005 •. bakersfield.coin- Board backs ban on sludge Page 3 of 3 •. Fresno appeals court could end up being positive for Kern. "You may well be the first county to require a detailed list of exactly what's in(every truckload of) sludge," Florez said. Sludge critics have said no one really knows what's in the mix,which contains tons of toxic chemicals distilled from industrial users. The discussion drew an impassioned speech from a top county bureaucrat, David Price III,who oversees the Resource Management Agency. Price praised the board's leadership in crafting ever-stricter sludge policies with no outside help. "Let's make no mistake," Price said. "The state has shirked its responsibility for 10 years... . You guys have been the Lone Ranger out there." Supervisor Michael Rubio, a former Florez staffer, said the county's Sacramento lobbyist should get busy on the issue, which isn't a Republican-versus-Democrat matter but a rural-versus-urban issue. The urban powers that be, Rubio said,are "taking advantage of folks in Kern County" who often don't have a voice in state politics. Several members of the public spoke. Robert Campbell,when discussing what Kern has to gain or lose with sludge imports, closed by saying the county could "lose the name: 'Toilet Bowl of L.A."' Arthur Unger of the local Sierra Club said debate about "mixing urine and feces with toxic industrial waste ... and (spreading) it on the ground" could hopefully stimulate federal regulators and the sludge industry to clean up government rules "which have precipitated this mess over the entire nation" in the last few decades. No biosolids supporters spoke at the meeting. http://www.bakersfield.com/local/v-print/story/5417247p-5426235c.btml 4/7/2005 April 12,2005 CALIFORNIA Kern County May Bar Southland Sludge L.A. and Orange County sewage agencies daily send tons of treated human waste to farms. Officials fear risks to public health. By Tonya Alanez, Times Staff Writer Kern County supervisors say they are tired of Southern California dumping its sewage sludge in their county and are considering ways to further regulate, restrict or perhaps ban truckloads of treated human waste from coming into the county for use on farmland. Supervisors asked county staff April 5 to draft new regulations, including a possible ban, by early May. "We're the toilet bowl for Southern California," said County Counsel Bernard Barmann Sr. "A third of all sludge generated in California comes into Kern County. This is a very, very hot issue locally." Supervisors unanimously agreed at the same meeting to support a bill proposed by state Sen. Dean Florez (D-Shafter) that would stop shipments of sludge across county lines and require counties to deal with sewage within their boundaries. Sewage districts in Los Angeles and Orange counties truck sludge to Kern County daily. Technically called biosolids, the sludge is the solid matter left after the sanitation district treats sewage by extracting and cleansing the water. Kern County banned the importation of lower-quality Class B sludge in the late-1990s. Sanitation districts in Los Angeles and Orange counties sued soon after. The 5th District Court of Appeal ruled April 1 that Kern County can maintain its ban but must prepare an environmental report to justify it. Kern County officials are now focusing on "Class A exceptional quality" sludge. Kern County officials said pathogens are removed from this type of sludge, but some heavy metals and industrial waste remain. Sutter, San Joaquin and Stanislaus counties have banned sludge imports and nine other counties have imposed such strict regulations that they function as bans, Kern County Supervisor Michael Rubio said. "This is a classic case of urban versus rural politics," Rubio said. "The urbanites are those who are very well represented in the governmental structures. They're sending their sludge and industrial waste to Kern County, and it's not fair to the people of Kern County." Kern County officials worry about public health risks from spreading sludge laced with heavy metals, industrial waste and other toxic substances on farmland and near drinking-water storage sites, including some owned by the Metropolitan Water District. 'We should never, ever jeopardize our water resources," Rubio said. "It's our drinking water, it's what our children drink, and it's what the people of Los Angeles drink." The Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts ship about five truckloads of biosolids to Kern County for"reuse" each day, said supervising engineer Mike Sullivan. "Biosolids is one of the most scientifically studied materials," he said. "Decades of work and scientific research went into developing the regulations that govem its use. If you follow the requirements that are in place, it's as safe as any other practice." An all-out ban would prevent the Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation from shipping 25 truckloads of sludge daily to a farm it owns south of Bakersfield. The bureau has a contingency plan to ship its waste to Arizona, said Diane Gilbert, the bureau's biosolids regulatory liaison. "We have not caused any environmental impacts, health concerns or health impacts to the residents in Kern County," Gilbert said. "We've gone above and beyond all the regulations. This was actually not expected that they would be looking at a ban." The bureau would be willing to work with the county on more testing, regulating or monitoring, she said. The Orange County Sanitation District pays a Kern County farmer$38 a ton to transport and till the 230 tons of biosolids it sends north each day. "We see it as a natural marriage of the urban setting with the agricultural setting," said Blake Anderson, the district's general manager. If Kern County bans sewage imports, the district would look to south Orange County landfills, Kings County farmland it owns, and Riverside County and Arizona sites, to dispose of biosolids. "We're hoping that we can work with Kern County and come up with a way that is acceptable to them, meets their expectations, and that we can continue to do business up there," Anderson said. "We see it as a great opportunity to bring nutrients back to the farming community at no cost to them." Water district names manager Vice president tops four other finalists By Jose Luis Jimenez UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER April 2, 2005 Dennis Underwood, a veteran of western water scuffles, was selected yesterday as CEO/general manager of the Metropolitan Water District, which supplies San Diego County with up to 90 percent of its water. Underwood, 60, has been a vice president at MWD for nearly six years while specializing in the Colorado River and the complex relationship between the wildlife that depend on it, the Western states that draw water from it and the U.S. government that manages it. The river is the backbone of Southern California's water supply and the county's main source. Wes Bannister, MWD board chairman, said Underwood's background distinguished him from the four other finalists. "His past experience and his ability to work with people both internally and externally set him apart," Bannister said. Underwood said he plans to focus on securing future water supplies, including wastewater that is flushed into sewers and dumped in the Pacific Ocean. He believes expanding treatment plants and finding more uses for treated wastewater could alleviate the pressure on existing resources. He sees similar opportunities with brackish water and desalination. Underwood also wants to explore more transfers of agricultural water to urban areas. The San Diego County Water Authority recently reached an agreement to buy water from the Imperial Irrigation District, which supplies farmers in the Imperial Valley. "There are opportunities for good partnerships that will help us and help them," Underwood said. He will become the 12th leader in the agency's 77-year history, replacing Ron Gastelum, who brought a corporate, authoritative management style that sometimes clashed with the goals of the San Diego County Water Authority. Local officials look forward to working with Underwood. "He is a low-key, but extremely knowledgeable water professional," said George Loveland, the authority's vice chairman. Born in Greenfield, Mass., Underwood was raised in Vernon, Vt. He earned a bachelor's degree in civil engineering from Norwich University and reached the rank of captain with the Army Corps of Engineers. The military sparked his interest in water issues, which brought him to California in the 1960s. He worked here for the Department of Natural Resources and, from 1978 to 1989, for the Colorado River Board of California, where he reached the post of executive director. He then served from 1989 to 1993 as commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, the agency responsible for many of the West's water resources. He next worked as a consultant, before joining MWD in 1999. Underwood's salary and contract should be determined by the board April 12, at which time he will take over the duties of CEO. He makes $165,000 annually as vice president. MWD consists of 26 member agencies across Southern California, including the San Diego County Water Authority, and supplies water to 18 million people from Ventura to San Ysidro. CALFRIMASSOCRY9#0SAWIIAMN AM" 925 L Street, Suite 1400• Sacramento,CA 95814 •TEL: (916)446-0388—FAX(916)4484808 • Via Electronic Mail April 15,2005 TO: CASA Member Agencies CASA Attorneys FROM: Bobbi Larson, Director, Legal &Regulatory Affairs SUBJECT: CAL/EPA Briefing on Strengthening the Enforcement of Environmental Laws in California On April 14, 2005,Maureen Gorsen,the Deputy Secretary for Law Enforcement and Counsel for the California Environmental Protection Agency(CAL/EPA), briefed the public on how CAL/EPA plans to strengthen the enforcement of environmental laws in California. In general, CAL/EPA plans to increase its enforcement of such laws and to achieve higher compliance rates for cleaner air, water, and the environment and to protect human health and safety. In November 2003, Governor Schwarzenegger released his Action Plan for the Environment, which directs CAL/EPA to"protect California's environment through the tough enforcement of existing laws." As a consequence, in 2004, CAL/EPA conducted a yearlong assessment to determine where the agency should focus its resources to strengthen the enforcement of the state's environmental laws at all levels of government. During this time, CAL/EPA interviewed enforcement leaders, managers, and field staff throughout the state. CAL/EPA also consulted studies,reviews, and analyses by academia, previous gubernatorial administrations, CAL/EPA,the Legislative Analyst's Office, and the State Auditor. The assessment prompted CAL/EPA to determine it should increase compliance rates, employ enforcement resources towards the areas of highest environmental risk and non-compliance, increase statewide consistency in enforcement response, and ensure that clear and enforceable rules exist. Ms. Gorsen discussed the spectrum of environmental enforcement,which requires CAL/EPA to define compliance, educate the regulated community about compliance, assist the regulated community with compliance, initiate administrative enforcement, and, finally, initiate judicial enforcement (e.g., civil and criminal lawsuits). CAL/EPA's goal is to get enforcement agencies to use the"full panoply" of their enforcement tools,while concentrating the greatest efforts in informal enforcement. She noted that the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWS2CB1d1not instigate enough, if any, cnminal actions. However,the CAL/EPA finds SWRCB's and RWQCB's "expeditious administrative prosecutions" laudable. Ensuring Clean Wafer for California CASA Member Agencies CASA Attorneys April 15, 2005 Page 2 Ms. Gorsen also stated that the SWRCB and RWQCBs should"complete their enforcement nets." In other words, the SWRCB and RWQCBs need to focus on more than just ensuring permit limits are met. She offered San Diego (Region 9) as an example of how to com fete the=f=ement net. During the assessment, CAL/EPA concluded that Region 9 does a good job of prioritizing their enforcement actions based on the highest environmental risk. When asked about what"highest environmental risk" means in this context, however,Ms. Gorsen responded that the risks are still "unknown." CAL/EPA needs to conduct more monitoring, data management, and other tasks to determine where the highest environmental risks are with respect to water quality. Additionally, CAL/EPA expects the SWRCB and RWQCBs to develop a greater presence in the field, possibly by increasing the number of inspections and/or by shifting more employees into the environmental enforcement realm. CAL/EPA also expects the SWRCB and RWQCBs to create complaint triages and data systems to improve how they collect and manage information. Finally, CAL/EPA wants the SWRCB and RWQCBs to clearly define compliance in their rules and permits. When asked what this means,Ms. Gorsen's colleague, Lisa Brown, CAL/EPA's Assistant General Counsel for Enforcement, responded that CAL/EPA is considering including quantitative limits in permits in lieu of qualitative limits. Since this is a contentious issue, however, "nothing concrete is in the works." The bottom line is that CAL/EPA plans to better measure how the regulated community comp ies vviI environmental laws and tohave—an enforcement response for each com lance vio ation they find. Consequently, the regulated community should ensure that they comply with their permit conditions and all other applicable environmental laws and policies. cc: CASA Executive Board Cassie Aw-Yang Ensuring Clean Water for California Tuesday, April 12, 2005 More water in store Robotic pool man invented that will increase supply in O.C. groundwater. By AMY TAXIN The Orange County Register It started with a chat over coffee more than a decade ago. Chris McConaughy, a hydrologist, and his boss, Allen Flowers, started thinking of ways to get more water into Orange County's parched aquifer to meet a growing population's demand. With little open space available to start digging new groundwater basins, the pair decided the best way was to help existing ponds in Anaheim and Orange seep more water into the ground faster. Today, they have a machine that does it for them. Orange County Water District has invented a vacuum-like gadget that kicks up silt from the basin floor and removes it through a long tube to prevent clogging. Traditionally, the district had to drain each basin and use bulldozers to clear away clay bits that prevented water from seeping into the aquifer from which residents draw their drinking water. That put the basins out of service for six weeks twice during the year, cutting the potential water supply. "In Southern California, water is kind of like oil," McConaughy said. "It's very precious, and every little bit of it needs to be conserved and put into the ground for future use." Orange County Water District, which serves 2.3 million residents north of Irvine, takes about half its water from rainwater that rushes through the Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek. It must buy the other half from the more plentiful Colorado River or Northern California. An acre-foot of water—enough for just two families for a year—costs $250. That is why the district is striving to get more river water into the ground quicker by keeping basins clean. "The classic problem that everyone has had to deal with is the basins clog, and that means the recharge rates from the basins slow down," said Jordan Clark, a geologist at UC Santa Barbara. "This little robot, which I think is just a glorified pool cleaner, in a lot of ways it's very significant." Through a series of pumps and canals, the district channels river water into recharge basins in Anaheim and Orange, where it seeps slowly into the ground. Water that can't be stored is flushed out to the Pacific Ocean. The district started using basin cleaning vehicles, or BCVs, in four ponds about a year ago to increase the rate that water seeps, or percolates, into the ground. That came a decade after tinkering with different designs. At first, a team of engineers built a submarine cleaner that worked like an underwater vacuum. While the cleaning head worked well, the heavy machine was difficult to service and got waterlogged. The district patented the cleaning mechanism in 2000. This time, it adapted its invention to a lighter vehicle— a small $700,000 barge that is guided across the surface of the recharge basins using computer-controlled cables. It seems to be working, said Howard Chang, a 30-year water district employee. Chang monitors one of the BCVs from a small cabin on a dirt road that winds around one of the shallower basins in Anaheim. A computer screen shows the machine— a yellow dot— blip across the surface of the manmade lake. Usually, it runs on automatic pilot. When troubles arise, Chang speeds out to the center of the pond in a motor-powered boat to control the BCV from a tiny booth on top of the vessel. "If the wind is blowing the right way, like today, we nap," Chang joked. The district declined to release initial results for the BCV. Typically, water seeps into the ground at one rate when the basins are clean but slower when they are clogged. Officials say the machine should pay for itself in two years by saving the district the cost of importing water. One of the challenges will be adapting the BCV to deeper ponds such as the Santiago Recharge Basin, a 150-foot deep pit set in the hills of Orange. Santiago can percolate 120 cubic feet of water per second —equivalent to 240 acre-feet a day—while shallower ponds like the ones currently using BCVs percolate 40 cubic feet per second. Other water districts appear to be keeping an eye on the project. Ted Johnson, chief hydrologist for the district serving southern Los Angeles County, has looked into building special de-silting basins or using chemicals to prevent silt from clogging basin floors. Either way, the challenge is the same: finding a way to get more water into the ground. "if the spreading basins can be full of water all of the time with a BCV or other device cleaning off the sediment, that could provide a benefit," Johnson said. "If it turns out to be a cost-effective product, we'd be interested in learning more about it." Q s a2 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PERIOD: March 1, 2005—March 31, 2005 TO: PDC Committee FROM: David A. Ludwin, P.E. Director of Engineering STAFF CONTACT: Larry Rein CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS • Summary Progress to Date 0 108-inch Pipe: 7,284 ft of pipe have been installed between Treatment Plant 2 and Panacea Drive/ Bushard Street intersection. o The Bushard Trunk Sewer pipeline has been installed in the Bushard Intersections with Atlanta Avenue, Indianapolis Avenue, Adams Avenue, and Yorktown Avenue and the Fountain Valley Channel crossing. • Bushard Work Stoppage o Construction is estimated to continue in late fall 2005; contingent on availability of the 108-inch pipe. TECHNICAL/PROBLEM SOLVING ISSUES: • Piping Purchase Specifications o Staff will be working with the design engineer to prepare specifications for purchasing of pipe necessary to complete the project. • Ellis Avenue/Bushard Street Intersection o Staff has been coordinating design and construction of Ellis Avenue Pump Station facilities with the Bushard Trunk Sewer facilities. o The Orange County Water District water line replacement projects are being coordinated with the work in the intersection. o City of Fountain Valley planned construction activities are also being coordinated with work in the intersection. • Phasing of Remaining Work o Staff is planning to meet with the cities of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley to discuss phasing options and alternatives to accelerate the completion of the work. COMMUNITY OUTREACH / PUBLIC CONCERNS: • Construction Notifications o During March, a notification was sent out informing residents of the paving work on five Bushard intersections— March 4, 2005 • Weekly Updates (3) o March 4, 2005 o March 11, 2005 o March 18, 2005 o Weekly updates will be discontinued at this time. As information becomes available, the public will be informed via letters and Web site updates. • Property Damage Complaints o During March, there was one new claim received and no claims were settled or denied by Rados insurance companies. To date, OCSD has received 98 complaints. Of the 98 complaints, 68 have filed claims with OCSD Risk Management. Two complaints have been dropped and one complaint has been settled. o See Legal issues for further information. LEGAL ISSUES AND CONCERNS: • Mediation o On March 23, staff and legal counsel participated in mediation with the Contractor and pipe supplier. As a result of the mediation, staff will be requesting authorization at the April Board meeting to enter into a settlement. • Homeowner Lawsuit o On March 28, OCSD was served with a summons and complaint filed by 62 homeowners. Legal counsel is reviewing and will brief the Board regarding the lawsuit. LR: z N Orange County Sanitation District 0 � b ya'E N CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION UPDATE STARTING: Monday, March 7, 2005 DURATION: 2 weeks WHAT: Final paving WHERE: Bushard Street intersections This construction is part of the Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) Bushard Trunk Sewer Project which is replacing a major, aging sewer pipeline. Starting on Monday, March 7, 2005, the following locations will be paved in the order listed below: ■ Fountain Valley Channel-Bushard (just south of Garfield) ■ Yorktown-Bushard ■ Adams-Bushard ■ Indianapolis-Bushard ■ Atlanta-Bushard There will be temporary traffic restrictions Monday— Friday from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. as the paving progresses. At the end of each day, traffic will be restored to normal operations. Please note that paving will be delayed if it rains during this period. If you have any questions, please call the Construction Hotline at (714) 378-2965. For further Information about the project, or to sign up for e-Subscriptions to receive regular updates about projects near you, please visit our Web site at www.ocsd.com . Thank you for your patience during this period. OCSD P.O.Box 8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 (714)962-2411 From: forinformation@ocsd.com Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 10:01 AM Subject: OCSD Bushard Weekly Update-Mar 4-Mar 11 Bushard Street - 108-inch pipe installation: Bushard Street is open to thru traffic Final paving of Bushard Street intersections (Atlanta, Indianapolis, Adams, Yorktown and the Fountain Valley Channel) is scheduled for the week of March 7, 2005 if weather permits. Please visit http://www.ocsd.com/civica/filebank/blobdload.asp?BlobID=4546 for an updated construction map. If you have any questions please call the Construction Hotline at (714) 378-2965. If you would like to be removed from this distribution list please reply to this e-mail. 1 Orange County Sanitation District Bushard Trunk Sewer Construction Project Weekly Status Update March 04, 2005 ■ Installed 108-inch Pipe and 0o Completed Intersection Structures Sew r ® Current Construction Areas ELLIS AV = u Ell Upcoming Construction Areas OCSO FOLD AIN P.ANT FOR MORE INFORMATION CALL CONSTRUCTION HOTLINE (714) 378-2965 GARFIELD AV 1' YORKTOWN AV F /- N (n Q F- J N O Z Q Y O O co m ADAMS AV Final Pavement Cap Work at Intersections. Start Date: March 07, 2005. Estimated Completion Date: March 11, 2005 Traffic flow will be restricted. INDIANAPOLIS AV Final Pavement cap work at 5 intersections a (Atlanta, Indianapolis, Adams,Yorktown, and FV Channel areas),weather permitting. C m ATLANTAAV -; - End of Bushard-Installation of 108-inch pipe. Conrad Dr Start Date: October 4, 2004. Panacea Dr Completion Date: February 25,2005 Waterfront or Bushard St. is open to thru traffic. HAMILTON AV BANNING V i i a .41 CO 0 gsrh� OCSJ Cy PLANT wq N O.2 From: forinformation@ocsd.com Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 4:57 PM Subject: OCSD Bushard Weekly Update-Mar 11 -Mar 18 Bushard Street - 108-inch pipe installation: This week Bushard Street intersection paving job was completed Next week traffic loop detectors will be repaired and striping will be completed. Please visit http://www.ocsd.com/civica/filebank/blobdload.asp?BlobID=4589 for an updated construction map. If you have any questions please call the Construction Hotline at (714) 378-2965. If you would like to be removed from this distribution list please reply to this e-mail. 1 ��Ir Orange County Sanitation District Bushard Trunk Sewer Construction Project Weekly Status Update — March 11 , 2005 F - Installed 108-inch Pipe and SFW 40 I Completed Intersection Structures y _ z ® Current Construction Areas ELLIS AV = U AUpcoming Construction Areas FOUN AIN °AN FOR MORE INFORMATION NO.' CALL CONSTRUCTION HOTLINE (714) 378-2965 GARFIELD AV I. I -YORKTOWN AV .,.� 1.. N N Q 2 F- - Repair Traffic Loops and Traffic Striping at o Intersections. m lnDAr4ss nv 1 Start Date: March 14,2005. Completion Date: March 18, 2005 Traffic flow will be restricted. ,-. - ; Repair traffic loops and traffic striping at 5 intersections (Atlanta, Indianapolis, Adams, INDIANAPOLISAV - Yorktown, and FV Channel areas). J � i Completed Final Pavement Cap Work at $ Intersections. U /- C m r Ar�ANTAAV End of Bushard -Installation of 108-inch pipe. Conrad or Start Date: October 4, 2004. Panacea Dr Completion Date: February 25, 2005 w,«rrronl Dr Bushard St. is open to thru traffic. HAMILTON AV BANNING V A 9C�F/C CO gsTy OCSD C PLANT h hg NO.2 From: forinformation@ocsd.com Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 3:29 PM Subject: OCSD Bushard Weekly Update- Mar 18-Mar 25 Bushard Street - 108-inch pipe installation: North-Hamilton Avenue to Fountain Valley Channel Intersection: This week traffic loop detectors were repaired and striping was completed. Next week maintenance holes spark testing will take place from Banning Avenue to Hamilton Avenue. Please visit http://www.ocsd.com/civica/filebank/blobdload.asp?BlobID=4609 for an updated construction map. If you have any questions please call the Construction Hotline at (714) 378-2965. If you would like to be removed from this distribution list please reply to this e-mail. 1 Orange County Sanitation District Bushard Trunk Sewer Construction Project Weekly Status Update — March 18, 2005 rtiE Installed 108-inch Pipe and ao Completed Intersection Structures SFk'Y ® Current Construction Areas ELLIS AV _ Upcoming Construction Areas z ocsD PLANT FOR MORE INFORMATION CALL CONSTRUCTION HOTLINE (714) 378-2965 GARFIE_D AV t. YORKTOVVN AV ' r O Z Completed Final Pavement Cap Work at o y Intersections. z O -AD AV " Start Date: March 7, 2005. Completion Date: March 18, 2005 Final pavement cap work at 5 intersections (Atlanta, Indianapolis, Adams,Yorktown, and FV Channel areas). INDIANAPOL IS AV - --- - , w m Fa- ATLANTAAV End of Bushard-Installation of 108-inch pipe. Conrad or Start Date: October 4, 2004. Panacea Dr Completion Date: February 25,2005 Bushard St. is open to thru traffic. Waterfront Dr HAMILTON AV BANNING V n aC/ /C CO S T Ocso PLANT N h'� N 0.2 2005-06 COMMITTEE/BOARD CALENDAR JULY `05 AUGUST `05 SEPTEMBER `05 S M T W I T I F I S S M T I W I T I F I S 7STM I T I W I T F S 1 2 1 2 j 3 4 1 5 6 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 i 29 30 31 OCTOBER `05 NOVEMBER `05 DECEMBER `05 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 18 19 20 22 23 24 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 30 31 JANUARY `06 FEBRUARY `06 MARCH `06 F-T M T W T F I S F-s7-m T W TF SSMT W T F S 12-- 3 456 7 - --1 2 - 3 - -4- -- - -- - 1 2 3 4 S _ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 22 23 24 26 27 28 19 20 21 23 24 25 19 20 21 23 24 25 29 30 31 26 27 28 26 27 28 29 30 31 APRIL `06 MAY `06 JUNE `06 S M T W T F S S 77mT W T F S S M T W T F S 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 24 25 27 28 29 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 29 30 30 1 Board Meetings(Blue) OMTS Meetings(Red) PDC Meetings(Yellow) FAHR Meetings(Green) OCSD Holidays AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING April 27, 2005 — 7:00 P.M. Agenda Posting: In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. Items Not Posted: In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item or because there is a need to take immediate action, which need came to the attention of the Board subsequent to the posting of agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted in the manner as above, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. Accommodations for the Disabled: The Board of Directors Meeting Room is wheelchair accessible. If you require any special disability related accommodations, please contact the Orange County Sanitation District Board Secretary's office at (714) 593-7130 at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Requests must specify the nature of the disability and the type of accommodation requested. Items Continued: Items may be continued from this meeting without further notice to a Committee or Board meeting held within five (5) days of this meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(3). Meeting Adjournment: This meeting may be adjourned to a later time and items of business from this agenda may be considered at the later meeting by Order of Adjournment and Notice in accordance with Government Code Section 54955 (posted within 24 hours). 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors. as follows: City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director Irvine Ranch Water District Darryl Miller Douglas Reinhart 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem. if necessary 04/27/05 Page 2 5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair: consideration of Resolutions or recommendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager 1. Groundwater Replenishment System Advanced Water Purification Facility Operation (Michael R. Markus. P.E., Assistant General Manager, OCWD) C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made. the minutes for the regular meeting held on March 23. 2005, will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District. by roll call vote. as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 03/15/05 03/31/05 Totals $9,966.673.15 S13.059,954.04 DIRECTORS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than $250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving OCSD. This requires that you identify the contributor by name. Further. you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with OCSD. For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308, please see your Directors Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. 04/27/05 Page 3 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance. there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall. upon recognition by the Chair, state their name. address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. (1) Receive and file petition from John McCreary requesting annexation of 1.22 acres to Orange County Sanitation District. in the vicinity of Meads Avenue and Orange Park Boulevard, in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and, (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 05-06. authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-49 — McCreary Annexation). b. (1) Receive and file petitions requesting annexation of 2.876 acres to Orange County Sanitation District, in the vicinity of Randall Street and Clark Lane, in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and, (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 05-07, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-50 — Sullivan Annexation). C. Approve Utility Agreement No. 12-UT-856 with the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to adjust eleven sewer valve frames and covers, and 22 sewer manhole frames and covers on Pacific Coast Highway. from Old Newport Boulevard to Beach Boulevard within Orange County for an amount not to exceed $12,100. d. Approve an accommodation agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) to allow sewage flow from the City of Newport Beach to enter the IRWD system: and (2) Authorize a $231,000 past sewage flow credit to IRWD, in a form approved by General Counsel. 04/27/05 Page 4 e. Consideration of the following actions for Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains Replacement Project, Contract No. 5-58: (1) Approve the Alternative 2C alignment as the Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains Replacement Project, as described in the Final EIR for the Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains Replacement Project, Contract No. 5-58, previously certified pursuant to Resolution OCSD 05-05; (2) Authorize staff to file the Notice of Determination for the Project in accordance with the requirements of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the District's CEQA procedures: and, (3) Authorize staff to proceed with implementation of the Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains Replacement Project. Contract No. 5-58. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 11. STEERING COMMITTEE Consent Calendar a. Order draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 23. 2005, to be filed. Non-Consent Calendar b. Review and consideration of agenda items considered by the Steering Committee re the April 27. 2005 meeting. C. Consideration of items deleted from Steering Committee Consent Calendar. if any. 12. OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE (OMTS) OMTS Consent Calendar a. Order draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 6. 2005, to be filed. b. Adopt the revised State Office of Emergency Services Resolution with updated job titles for the purpose of obtaining Federal and/or State financial assistance. C. Receive and file the Ocean Monitoring Program Annual Report for 2004. d. Receive and file Compliance Summary for the 2004 Annual Report for Biosolids. 04/27/05 Page 5 e. (1) Receive and file Biosolids Advisory Committee Final Report dated February 2005: (2) Receive and file Biosolids Management Options White Paper dated March 16. 2005: (3) Authorize the General Manager to negotiate final terms and conditions, in a form approved by General Counsel.. for a contract with EnerTech Environmental, Inc. to manage biosolids at their facility in Rialto. California for a 10-year period. and to provide two five-year extensions at a maximum cost of $69.40 per ton of biosolids, for an amount not to exceed $5.500.000 per year, plus the agreed upon contract escalators, to be submitted to the OMTS and Board for final approval; and, (4) Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Memorandum of Understanding with South Orange County Wastewater Authority (SOCWA), authorizing the General Manager to continue participation with for Phase II work including the on-going preliminary facility design, permitting, and community relations activities for the development of a composting facility at the Prima Deshecha Landfill in South Orange County, as managed by SOCWA. for an amount not to exceed S150.000 and direct staff to report back to the OMTS Committee periodically on work progress. OMTS Non-Consent Calendar d. Consideration of items deleted from OMTS Committee Consent Calendar, if any 13. PLANNING. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE (PDC) PDC Consent Calendar a. Order draft Planning. Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 7, 2005 to be filed. b. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 3 for the EOC Control Center and Central Lab Office Modifications, Job No. SP2001-08. with Akraa Construction Inc., authorizing an addition of $10,320 and 59 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $125,313.90. and. (2) Accept EOC Control Center and Central Lab Office Modifications, Job No. SP2001-08, as complete, authorizing the Final Closeout Agreement. C. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Removal of Underground Storage Tanks at Truck Wash, Plant No. 2, Job No. FE05-12, and Underground Storage Tank Remediation at Cen Gen Building. Plant No. 2, Job No. FE05-13. with JEM Industries. Inc.. authorizing an additional $16.004, and 22 calendar days. increasing the total contract amount to $155,804-, and, 04/27/05 Page 6 (2) Accept Removal of Underground Storage Tanks at Truck Wash, Plant No. 2. Job No. FE05-12. and Underground Storage Tank Remediation at Cen Gen Building, Plant No. 2, Job No. FE05-13, as complete, authorizing the Final Closeout Agreement. d. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer— Watson Avenue . Contract No. 6-13-1, and College Avenue Pump Station Replacement Force Mains, Contract No. 7-23-1, with Mike Prlich and Sons, Inc.. authorizing a credit of $58,815. decreasing the total contract amount to $2,530,871; and, (2) Accept Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer - Watson Avenue, Contract No. 6-13-1, and College Avenue Pump Station Replacement Force Mains, Contract No. 7-23-1, as complete, and approve the Final Closeout Agreement. e. Ratify Change Order No. 19 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37. with Margate Construction. authorizing an addition of $116,710, increasing the total contract amount to $71,523,137. f. Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements, Reach "A", Contract No. 7-36: Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39; Gisler- Redhill/North Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-41; and City of Tustin Project Nos. 6106 and 6151, with ARB. Inc., authorizing an addition of $571,975 and 20 calendar days. increasing the total contract amount to S19,466,809. g. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 for Tenant Improvements to Rebuild Shop at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-89 with Dalke and Sons Construction. Inc., authorizing an addition of $16,011 and 80 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $128,901: and. (2) Accept Tenant Improvements to Rebuild Shop at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-89, as complete. and approve the Final Closeout Agreement. h. (1) Approve a budget increase of $1,237,054, increasing the total budget to $6,677.533 and, (2) Approve Amendment No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Pirnie. Inc. providing for additional engineering services for Air Quality Improvements.. Job No. J-79. for an additional amount of $1,237,054, increasing the total amount not to exceed $3,067,601. i. Approve Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Tran Consulting Engineers for additional design engineering services for Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-21, for an additional amount of S66.087. increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,202,784. j. (1) Establish a budget for Realignment and Rehabilitation of the Big Canyon Offsite Trunk Sewer. Contract No. 5-61, in the amount of $2,280,000: 04/27/05 Page 7 (2) Approve a reimbursement agreement with the City of Newport Beach for Realignment and Rehabilitation of the Big Canyon Offsite Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-61, in a form approved by General Counsel. for an estimated amount not to exceed $2.000.000; and, (3) Authorize the General Manager to execute quitclaim deeds and purchase new easements with the Big Canyon Country Club.. in a form approved by General Counsel, to satisfy right-of-way needs for the new sewer alignment. PDC Non-Consent Calendar k. Consideration of items deleted from PDC Committee Consent Calendar, if any 14. FINANCE. ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE (FAHR) FAHR Consent Calendar a. Order draft Finance. Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 13, 2005 to be filed. (Minutes to be distributed at 04127105 Board Meeting.) b. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 2005. C. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 05-08. Adopting Policies and Procedures for the District's Records Management Program, Records Retention, and Destruction of Obsolete Records, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 04-07. d. Authorize the General Manager to issue a purchase order contract to Dharma Consulting to provide continuing professional services to assist executive and senior staff with ongoing strategic planning. executive management team coaching and team development; and staff team building, for a monthly amount not to exceed $15,000, for up to 12 months, for a total amount not to exceed $180.000. e. Approve new non-residential user fee codes for Laundromats and Nightclubs, and set the user fee rates equivalent to 1,800 percent and 200 percent of the Single-Family Residential Rate per 1,000 Square Feet, respectively; and adjust the user fee rate for Motels downward from 97 percent to 70 percent of the Single-Family Residence rate per 1,000 square feet. 04/27/05 Page 8 f. Approve a consulting service agreement for External Financial Auditing Services, Specification No. CS-2005-217, with Conrad & Associates for a five-year period beginning with the audit of the financial statements for FY 2004-05. at the following maximum annual fees: FY FY of Auditing Maximum Being Audited Services Contract Annual Fees FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 $46,550 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 47,795 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 49,040 FY 2007-08 FY 2008-09 50,315 FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 51,590 FAHR Non-Consent Calendar g. Ordinance No. OCSD-26. An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges: Establishing Capital Facilities Capacity Charges: Adopting Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Charges. Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers, and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-24: Adopting Revised Table B re Property Use Classifications for Commercial or Industrial Users, and Revised Table E re Administrative Fees and Charges Relating to Permit tees. and Reaffirming All Other Charges a. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-26 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) b. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-26. and pass to second reading and public hearing on May 25. 2005. h. Consideration of items deleted from FAHR Committee Consent Calendar. if any. 15. GWR SYSTEM STEERING COMMITTEE (GWRSSC) GWRSSC Consent Calendar a. Order Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 14. 2005 to be filed. GWRSSC Non-Consent Calendar b. Consideration of items deleted from GWRSSC Consent Calendar, if any. 04/27/05 Page 9 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 16. Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and complete a transaction with Natsource LLC for the exchange of up to 130 Ibs/day of District owned Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) Emission Reduction Credits for up to 130 Ibs/day of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) Emission Reduction Credits; for a not to exceed cost of $1,000 for filing the transaction with the SCAQMD. 17. Closed Session CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re pending litigation, Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 04CC06197, Government Code Section 54956.9. 2. Confer with General Counsel - Anticipated Litigation. Significant Exposure to Litigation. Government Code Section 54956.9(b). Two (2) potential cases. 3. Confer with General Counsel re pending litigation. Andino. et al. v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al.. Orange County Superior Court Case No. 05CC00054. Government Code Section 54956.9. 4. Confer with General Counsel re pending litigation. Orange County Sanitation District, et al. v. County of Kern. et al., Tulare County Superior Court Case No. 189564. Government Code Section 54956.9. b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 18. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report. 19. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 04/27/05 Page 9 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 16. Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and complete a transaction with Natsource LLC for the exchange of up to 130 Ibs/day of District owned Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) Emission Reduction Credits for up to 130 Ibs/day of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) Emission Reduction Credits; for a not to exceed cost of $1,000 for filing the transaction with the SCAQMD. 17. Closed Session CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property, (b) matters of pending or potential litigation: (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re pending litigation. Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 04CC06197, Government Code Section 54956.9. 2. Confer with General Counsel - Anticipated Litigation. Significant Exposure to Litigation. Government Code Section 54956.9(b). Two (2) potential cases. 3. Confer with General Counsel re pending litigation, Andino, et al. v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 05CC00054. Government Code Section 54956.9. 4. Confer with General Counsel re pending litigation, Orange County Sanitation District. et al. v. County of Kern, et al., Tulare County Superior Court Case No. 189564, Government Code Section 54956.9. b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 1& Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report. 19. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 04/27/05 Page 9 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 16. Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and complete a transaction with Natsource LLC for the exchange of up to 130 Ibs/day of District owned Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) Emission Reduction Credits for up to 130 Ibs/day of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) Emission Reduction Credits; for a not to exceed cost of$1,000 for filing the transaction with the SCAQMD. 17. Closed Session CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board. the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation. or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8. 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation: (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives: or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects. the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Confer with General Counsel re pending litigation. Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority v. Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 04CC06197, Government Code Section 54956.9. 2. Confer with General Counsel - Anticipated Litigation. Significant Exposure to Litigation, Government Code Section 54956.9(b). Two (2) potential cases. 3. Confer with General Counsel re pending litigation, Andino, et al. v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 05CC00054, Government Code Section 54956.9. 1. Confer with General Counsel re pending litigation, Orange County Sanitation District. et al. v. County of Kern. et al., Tulare County Superior Court Case No. 189564, Government Code Section 54956.9. b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 18. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report. 19. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 04/27/05 Page 10 20. Future Meeting Date: The next Board of Directors regular meeting is scheduled for May 25, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. 21. Adjournment ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... _...._ NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors, items shall be submitted to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days ;preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by :Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. :General Manager Blake Anderson (714) 593-7110 banderson(cDocsd.com :Board Secretary Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 pkVIeCcD.ocsd.com Director/Engineering David Ludwin (714) 593-7300 dludwin(a)ocsd.com Director/Finance/Treasurer Gary Streed (714) 593-7550 gstreed(a)ocsd.com :Director/Human Resources Lisa Tomko (714) 593-7145 Itomko(a)ocsd.corn :Director/Information Technology Patrick Miles (714) 593-7280 pmileso)ocsd.com :Director/Operations& Maintenance Bob Ooten (714) 593-7020 rooten(a-)ocsd.c0m :Director/Technical Services Bob Ghirelli (714) 593-7400 rghirelli(o)ocsd.com :Director/Communications & :Administrative Services Carol Beekman (714) 593-7120 cbeekman(a)ocsd.com ;General Counsel..............................................Brad..Hog!n.....................................(714) 564-2606......brh wss-law.com.......................................... H.\dept\agenda\Board Agendas12005 Board Agendas\042705 agenda doc Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING MARCH 23, 2005 c� �, Jam► Q r c N� THE ENy� ADM" IgT":.r. T`01j 0 F F I C E S 1 s44 EL .'.S AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting Q' Page 2 03/23/05 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on March 23, 2005 at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Steve Anderson, Chair Steve Simonian X James M. Ferryman, Vice Chair Arlene Schafer X Don Bankhead Leland Wilson X Carolyn Cavecche Steve Ambriz X Alberta Christy Mike Garcia X Larry Crandall John Collins X Bill Dalton Bruce Broadwater X Doug Davert Tony Kawashima X Harry Dotson David Shawver X Michael Duvall Keri Lynn Wilson X Norman Eckenrode Constance Underhill A Richard Freschi Patricia Bortle X Jill Hardy Debbie Cook X Sukhee Kang Steven Choi X Phil Luebben Lydia Sondhi X Patsy Marshall Jim Dow X Darryl Miller Peer A. Swan X Roy Moore John Beauman X Joy Neugebauer Vivian Kirkpatrick-Pilger X Ken Parker Catherine Driscoll X Tod Ridgeway Don Webb X Harry Sidhu Bob Hernandez X Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Mark Waldman Ralph Rodriguez X Paul Yost Charles Antos STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager; Penny Kyle, Board Secretary; Carol Beekman; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed; Lisa Tomko; Lilia Kovac; Jim Herberg; Mahin Talebi; Matt Smith; Dionne Kardos OTHERS PRESENT: Brad Hogin, General Counsel; Randy Fuhrman; Don Hughes Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 ` 03/23/05 PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman addressed the Board of Directors expressing concern over the borrowing debt. He requested Directors consider increasing user fees by 100% for 2005/06, and then a 50% increase each for the following two years. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair Anderson reported many compliments were received on the Biosolids Workshop that was held on March 16th, and he thanked staff for all of their efforts. It was reported that Directors Mike Duvall, Carolyn Cavecche, Jim Ferryman, Roy Moore, Phil Luebben, Mark Waldman, Jill Hardy and Patsy Marshall attended the Orange County Leadership Symposium held earlier that month at Lake Arrowhead. All concurred the session was excellent, to be tougher on the issues and kinder on people. Chair Anderson encouraged Directors to sign up for personal tours given by General Manager Blake Anderson of the Reclamation Plant if they had not already done so. Directors who have attended these tours have found them to be very helpful in understanding the size and complexity of the plant. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, referred to the Orange County Profiles Report that was included in the Directors' meeting folders. The report is prepared by the Center for Demographic Research (CDR), California State University, Fullerton. The District's engineering department utilizes much of the information that is provided by the CDR. Mr. Anderson updated the Directors on two bills under consideration in Sacramento. He reported SB 926, introduced by Senator Florez, would ban importing of biosolids from one county to another. If passed, this bill would have a significant impact to the District's management of biosolids. AB 1033, introduced by Assembly Member Lynn Daucher, would correct imbalances in the allocation of property taxes to the counties. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL Brad Hogin, General Counsel, had no report. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held February 23, 2005 be deemed approved, as corrected. i Minutes for Board Meeting r Page 4 03/23/05 RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS 02/15/05 02/28/05 Totals $11,147,918.09 $7,335,078.35 Director Crandall abstained from discussion and voting on Warrant No. 69411. Director Luebben abstained from discussion and voting on Warrant Nos. 68795, 68842, 68902, 69204, 69251 and 69425. Abstentions were pursuant to California Government Code Section 84308. CONSENT CALENDAR 9. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve an agreement with the City of Huntington Beach to transfer ownership for sewers that were constructed and modified under Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, in a form approved by General Counsel. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve the granting of a non- exclusive easement to the Southern California Gas Company at Reclamation Plant No. 1, concerning the Ground Water Replenishment System, Job No. J-36, in a form approved by General Counsel. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 11. STEERING COMMITTEE: A verbal report was presented by Director Anderson, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the March 23, 2005 meeting. Chair Anderson reported the Steering Committee concurred with General Manager Blake Anderson's recommendation that a Groundwater Replenishment System workshop not occur until Spring 2006. The General Manager also reported on the county's progress on a coordinated approach to managing urban runoff. Chair Anderson reported that he has received a verbal commitment from SAWPA that they have agreed to drop their lawsuit against the District and is waiting for written confirmation. Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order the Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 23, 2005 to be filed. b. 1. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve formation of an Ad Hoc Committee to advise the Steering Committee regarding General Counsel Legal Services. c Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 03/23/05 2. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve membership of the Ad Hoc Committee to consist of the following Board Members: Directors James Ferryman (Chair), Carolyn Cavecche, Doug Davert, Michael Duvall, Phil Luebben, Darryl Miller, and Tod Ridgeway. Non-Consent Calendar No items considered. 12. OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE (OMTS) OMTS Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 2, 2005, to be filed. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the General Manager to award a contract to Pro-Pipe Professional Pipe Services for Sewerline Cleaning For City of Tustin and Unincorporated County Property, Specification No. S- 2004-209, for an amount not to exceed $250,699, with four one-year renewable options. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Biannual Report re Ocean Discharge Permit Consent Decree Compliance, dated March 1, 2005. Non-Consent Calendar No items considered. 13. PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE (PDC) PDC Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 3, 2005 to be filed. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 14 to Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-2-4, with Steve P. Rados, Inc., authorizing an addition of$98,750, increasing the total contract amount to $32,235,886. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 18 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$61,690, increasing the total contract amount to $71,406,427. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 6 03/23/05 d. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 4 for Plant Nos. 1 and 2 Facilities Modifications for Odor Control, Job No. J-71-3, with J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$24,562, increasing the total contract amount to $2,248,445. e. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Secondary Treatment Facilities Process Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2- 47-3, with Morrow-Meadows Corporation, authorizing an addition of$526,958 and 215 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $5,789,437. f. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to DAF Power Distribution Reliability Upgrades, Job No. FE02-54, authorizing an addition of$34,056 and 351 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $93,256; and, (2) Accept DAF Power Distribution Reliability Upgrades, Job No. FE02-54, as complete, authorizing the Final Closeout Agreement. g. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Gas Compressor Building Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-79-1, with Adams/Mallory Construction Co., Inc., authorizing an addition of$5,328 and 126 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $510,176; and, (2) Accept Gas Compressor Building Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-79-1, as complete and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with Adams/Mallory Construction Co., Inc. h. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Kennedy/Jenks Consultants for engineering services for the Rehabilitation of MacArthur Pump Station, Contract No. 7-49, for an amount not to exceed $ 354,776. i. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with AKM Consulting Engineers providing for additional engineering services for Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements, Reach "A", Contract No. 7-36; Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39; and Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-41, for an additional amount of$75,596, increasing the total amount not to exceed $945,874. PDC Non-Consent Calendar No items considered. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 7 03/23/05 14. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE (FAHR) FAHR Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 9, 2005 to be filed. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 2005. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD05- 03, amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, amending Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual. d. Item pulled to FAHR Non-Consent Calendar. FAHR Non-Consent Calendar e. Director Marshall requested clarification of the effective date for the proposed resolution to be adopted for establishing the Fats, Oil and Grease Control Program fees. Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager, advised the resolution would be modified to establish the effective date of May 1, 2005. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD05-04, Establishing Fats, Oil and Grease Control Program Fees Applicable to Food Service Establishments, as modified. 15. GWR SYSTEM STEERING COMMITTEE (GWRSSC) GWRSSC Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meetings held on February 14, 2005 and February 28, 2005 to be filed. GWRSSC Non-Consent Calendar No items considered. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 8 r 03/23/05 NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 16. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Consideration of the following actions regarding environmental documentation required to approve Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains Replacement Project, Contract No. 5-58: (1) Receive and file Final Environmental Impact Report for the Newport Trunk and Force Mains Replacement Project, dated February 2004, prepared by Environmental Science Associates (ESA); and, (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 05-05, Certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report for Implementation of the Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains Replacement Project, Contract No. 5-58; Making Certain Findings Relating to Environmental Effects identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report; Adopting a Statement of Overriding Consideration; and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 17. There was no closed session. 18. Directors requested they be given the same presentation on the Groundwater Replenishment System that was recently provided to the Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:51 p.m. Penny M. Kyl Secretary to the Board of Di ctors of Orange County Sanitation District HAdeptladmin\BS\Minutes1032305 draft minutes.doc o I a Claims Paid From 02/01/05 to 02116/05 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 68793 City of Fountain Valley $ 28,207.77 Water Use 68794 Dell Marketing,L.P. 65,065.37 (6)Servers,(10)Monitors,(2)Drives,(7)Maint.Agreements&Misc.Hardware 68795 Southern California Edison 107,340.05 Power 68706 SAWPA 191,588.33 OCSD's Share of SARI Protection&Relocation Project 68797 Tule Ranch/Megan Fames 99,603.54 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 68798 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 120,024.18 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 68799 Airgas Safety,Inc. 4,659.34 Safety Supplies 68800 American Airlines 5,286.31 Travel Services 68801 Automation Service 1,268.21 Instrument Parts&Supplies 68802 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 709.68 Telephone Conference Services 68803 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 23.75 Telephone Service 68804 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 314.00 Piping Supplies 68805 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 68806 Compressor Components of California 4.416.00 Repair&Maintenance Service 68807 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 3,278.04 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 68808 County of Orange 182.14 Wage Garnishment 66809 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 68810 Court Trustee 454.49 Wage Garnishment 68811 California Special Districts Association 225.00 Training Registration 68812 Department of Child Support Services 188.50 Wage Garnishment 68813 DHL Express(USA),Inc. 58.48 Freight Services 68814 DIRECTV 359.00 Subscription for Emergency Operations Center 68815 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 9,719.96 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 68816 Court Order 445.00 Wage Garnishment 68817 ESRI,Inc. 850.00 Training Registration 68818 FedEx Corporation 81.12 Freight Services 68819 Franchlse Tax Board 100.00 Wage Garnishment 68820 Graybar Electric Company 756.61 Electrical Parts&Supplies 68821 City of Huntington Beach 13,697.13 Water Use 68822 Internal Revenue Service 300.00 Wage Garnishment 68823 Internal Revenue Service 200.00 Wage Garnishment 68824 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,866.92 Dues Deduction 68825 Irvine Ranch Water District 33.02 Water Use 68826 Maintenance Technology Corp 517.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 68827 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 3,115.65 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 68828 Mellon Trust 23,990.10 Investment Custodian Bank-Ortly.Admin.Fee 68829 Court Ober 226.00 Wage Garnishment 68830 Motion Industries,Inc. 1,248.45 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 68831 National Bond&Trust 2,386.81 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 68832 National Filter Media Corporation 6,538.39 Filter Press Belts 68833 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 4,112.94 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 68834 OCEA 635.61 Dues Deduction 68835 Pacific BeIIIWorldCom 292.13 Telephone Service 68M Peace Officers Council of CA 1,611.00 Dues Deduction 68837 PenValve 1,808.61 Plumbing Parts&Supplies H:%deptlfln%EXCEL.dtal220%APSHARE%Ctalms Pald Repod105-06%Cialms Pall Report-02-15-05.xis EXHIBIT A 1 aRnlinn. Pace 1 of 9 1.411M M Claims Paid From 02101/06 to 02115105 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 68838 PVF Sales, Inc. 638.92 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 68839 Smardan Supply Company-Fountain Valley 158.18 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 68M Court Osier 721.50 Wage Garnishment 68841 SoftChoice Corp. 233.78 Software 68842 Southern California Edison 31.05 Power 68843 Summit Steel 1,420.93 Metal 68844 SBC 1,309.91 Telephone Services 68845 SBC Long Distance 1,438.75 Telephone Services 68846 SCPLRC-Southern California Public 80.00 Training Registration 68847 The Pittsburgh Conference 85.00 Training Registration 68848 The Unisource Corporation 1,020.32 Office Supplies 68849 United Parcel Service 321.85 Parcel Services 68850 United Way 245.00 Employee Contributions 68851 University of Arizona 10,000.00 Membership-Industry/University Cooperative Research Center(UANSF Water Quality) 68852 Verizon California 1,144.80 Telephone Services 68853 Waste Markets Corp. 3.880.18 Maint.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Mat'I. Removal 68854 WEF 177.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 68855 WQI 500.00 Training Registration 68856 Court Order 597.50 Wage Garnishment 68857 City of Huntington Beach 2,960.60 Permit Fees-132-66 68858 Orange County Fire Authority 115.00 Permit Fees-Midway City Odor&Corrosion Control Project 68859 Airgas-West 24.78 Freight Charges 68860 Automation Service 1,292.65 Instrument Parts&Supplies 68861 ACWA 690.00 General Management Administration Meeting Registration(Assoc.of CA Water Agencies) 68882 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 252.50 Encroachment Permits 68863 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 2,794.80 Lab Parts&Supplies 68864 G.E.Supply 116.49 Electrical Paris&Supplies 68865 Johnstone Supply 307.99 Electrical Parts&Supplies 68M McMahan Business Interiors 480.28 Construction J-84 68867 Motorola, Inc. 4,454.39 Radios&Accessories 68868 Nextel Communications 812.87 Cellular Phones&Air Time 68869 O'Connor Sales, Inc. 1,604.92 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 68870 Pacific Mechanical Supply 104.55 Plumbing Supplies 68871 Partners Consulting Services 18,600.00 FIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 68872 Prudential Overall Supply 3,392.84 Unfforms&Related Articles 68873 Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. 15.19 Demurrage 68874 Select Heating&Air Conditioning,Inc. 6,6W.00 Construction J-88 68875 Tekdraulics,Inc. 78.30 Freight Charges 68876 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 31,023.75 Professional Services J-73-2 68877 Basic Chemical Solutions,L.L.C. 38,633.85 Sodium Bisulfrte&Sodium Hydroxide 68878 Black&Veatch Corporation 480,802.21 Engineering Services P1-102 68879 Blue Cross of California 342,027.10 Medical Insurance Premium 68880 Boyle Engineering Corporation 110,520.79 Professional Services 1-2-4 68881 Brown&Caldwell 289,317.11 Professional Services P2-90&122-91 68882 City of Tustin 25,000.00 Water Use 68883 Delta Dental 56,285.12 Dental Insurance Plan H:Weptlfn%EXCEL.dia1220%APSHARE%CWms Paid RepoH=-08%CIs!me Pa;d Report-02-15.05.x1a EXHIBIT A a„nim- Pace 2 of 9 wil' As `' el o Claims Paid From 02/01/06 to 02115105 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 68884 Disneyland Resort 164,680.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 68885 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 27.368.66 Long-Term&Short-Term Disability Ins. Premium 68886 Hill Brothers 26,955.09 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkline 68887 HDR Engineering, Inc. 308,800.42 Professional Services P1-82 68888 IPMC c/o Parsons 952.627.00 Professional Services-Integrated Program Management 68889 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 33,137.41 Repairs&Maint.Services-Natural Gas Line at Pit.2&Pump Out Catch Basin at Pit.2 68890 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 62,264.68 Medical Insurance Premium 68891 Kemiron Companies, Inc. 96,115.94 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 68892 Lee&Ro, Inc. 147,756.21 Professional Services 5-49,5-50.5-51 &5-52 68893 Malcolm Pimie, Inc. 107,727.71 Professional Services 1-10&J-79 68894 MDS Consulting 47,970.00 Prof.Services-Surveying Various Capital Projects 1-2-4 68895 NRG Thermal Services, L.L.C. 245,075.63 Professional Services J-79 68896 Orange County Water District 78,055.34 GAP Water Use 68897 Pacific Investment Management Co. 165,424.00 Investment Management Service Res.95-97 68898 PioneerAmedcas, Inc. 1W,085.69 Sodium Hypochlorite 68899 Polydyne, Inc. 59,219.06 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 68900 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 38,727.59 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 68901 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 29,660.86 Annual Emission,Operation&Misc.Fees 68902 Southern California Edison 58,039.17 Power 68903 South Coast Environmental Co. 25,694.83 Cen Gen Emissions Testing Service 68904 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 225,547.86 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 68905 U.S. Metro Group,Inc. 26,785.00 Janitorial&Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 68906 U.S. Peroxide,L.L.C. 78,972.66 Odor&Corrosion Control Treatment for Coll.Sys.;Hydrogen Peroxide&Ferrous Chloride 68907 Waste Markets Corp. 43,611.53 Maint.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Mat'I. Removal 68908 Water Environment Research Foundation 79,120.00 Subscription 68909 J F Shea Construction, Inc. 1,248,429.90 Construction J-71-3,J-77&J-35-1 68910 J R Filanc Construction 540,895.50 Construction P1-76 68911 JEM Industries 125,820.00 Construction FE05-12&FEOS-13 68912 Margate Construction, Inc. 289,254.88 Construction 131-37,J-67&Sump Pump Addition to Air Jumper Lines 68913 Morrow-Meadows Corp. 226,285.00 Construction 132-47-3 68914 Olsson Construction, Inc. 281,374.00 Construction P2-82 68915 Orange Community Bank 31,264.00 Construction 132-82, Retention 68916 Southern Contracting Company 31,620.00 Construction J-33-1 68917 Torrey Pines Bank 60,099.50 Construction 131-76, Retention 68918 Absolute Standards, Inc. 610.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 68919 Aero Compressor,Inc. 168.91 Compressor Parts&Supplies 68920 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 452.76 Lab Parts&Supplies 68921 Air Liquide America Corp. 246.40 Specialty Gases 68922 Airco Filter Service 543.08 Filters 68923 Airgas-West 86.82 Demurrage 68924 Airgas Safety, Inc. 100.76 Safety Supplies 68925 American Industrial Hygiene Association 186.00 Membership 68926 Aquarium Doctor 105.44 Human Resources Aquarium Service 68927 Ashbrook Corporation 3,272.48 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 68928 Awards&Trophies Company 226.82 Awards&Trophies 68929 ASSE American Soc.of Safety Engineers 140.00 Membership H:%deptlfln%EXCEL.dta1220"PSHARE%CWrrts Paid Report105-MCIaIms Paid Report-02-15-05.xls EXHIBIT A r;�ninn� Paae 3 of 9 v+r�ruw Claims Paid From 02JO1105 to OVIS105 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 68930 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 187.97 Telephone Conference Services 68931 ATCC 154A0 Lab Parts&Supplies 68932 AVO Training Institute 13,970.00 Training Registration 68933 Baker Tanks 560.00 Tank Rentals 68934 Basic Fit Laundry, Inc. 841.31 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 68935 Basler Electric Company 2,672.31 Electrical Parts&Supplies 68936 Battery Specialties 300.62 Batteries 68937 Bentley Systems, Inc. 19.76 Software 68938 Beo-Mag Electronics 378.14 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 68939 Blue Marlin Group 196.55 Fabricate Boat Hooks for Ocean Monitoring Vessel Nerissa 68940 Brindle Thomas Oil Co. 1,377.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 68941 BMC:Business Machines Consultants, Inc. 64.78 Multifunctional Copier/Scanner Maintenance Agreement 68942 BNI Building News 845.46 Publication 68M C.S.U.F. Foundation 11,079.50 Membership-Center for Demographic Research 68W C-Temp, Inc. 1,024.75 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 68945 Cal-Glass, Inc. 205.53 Lab Equipment Service 68946 California Auto Collision 940.47 Truck Body Repairs 88947 California Municipal Revenue&Tax Assoc. 50.00 Membership 68948 California Relocation Services, Inc. 45.00 Office Files Moving/Relocation Services 68949 California State University Institute 1,479.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 68950 Martin Boyer Co., Inc.do Cambridge 6.625.00 Prof.Services-Workers'Compensation Claims 68951 Cambridge Isotope Labs 2,360.04 Lab Parts&Supplies 68952 Casual Gourmet 824.12 Meeting Expenses 68953 CeII2CelI 16.76 Phones&Accessories 68954 Centre for Organization Effectiveness 5,552.00 Professional Services J-40-7 68955 Chapman University 250.00 Training Registration 68956 City of Brea 111.00 Conference Room Rental for Public Hearing Re 2-24-1 68957 Clean Energy 1,783.73 CNG Station Maintenance&Administration 68958 Cole-Pamrer Instrument Company 79.53 Lab Parts&Supplies 68959 Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. 2.100.00 Analysis of Wastewater, Industrial Wastewater&Biosollds 68M Communications Performance Group, Inc. 250.00 Prof.Servs.-Emergency Response Plan&Hazardous Energy Control Procedures 68961 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 6,037.21 Electrical Parts&Supplies 68962 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 2,612.55 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 68963 Cooper Cameron Corp. 125.39 Engine Supplies 68964 Corporate Express 2,333.10 Office Supplies 68965 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 168.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 689M Cortech Engineering 3,250.72 Pump Supplies 68967 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 35.00 Encroachment Permit-Garden Grove Winterburg Channel 68W8 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 385.00 Encroachment Permit 7-41 68969 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 932.00 Underground Storage Tank,Hazardous Material,&State Fees 68970 County Wholesale Electric Co. 58.28 Electrical Parts&Supplies 68971 CCP Industries 2.697.29 Janitorial Supplies 68972 CH2MHill 6,363.09 Engineering Services J-40-7&Evaluation of Spill&Power Outage of 9/9/04 SU73 CWEA 2002 Annual Conference 1,275.00 Training Registration(California Water Environment Association) 68974 CWEA Membership 291.00 Membership-Calif,Water Environment Assoc. 68975 David's Tree Service 6,425.00 Tree Maint.Service H:kleptlfntEXCEL.dta=IAPSHARE4CWnis Pad Report105-MClalms Pald Report-02-15-05.xis EXHIBIT A f.PJIM, Palle 4 of 9 aw�ret� o m) o Claims Paid From 02/01/05 to 02115/05 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 68976 Del Mar Analytical 2,169.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 68977 Dell Computer 4,676.49 (12)Powershot Digital Cameras&Hardware 68978 Department of Motor Vehicles 16.00 Clean Air Vehicle Decals 68979 Dharma Consulting 15,000.00 Prof.Services-Strategic Planning&EMT Development 68980 Dr.Smoothle Enterprises 401.20 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 68981 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 81.46 Paint Supplies 68982 DME, Inc. 623.90 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 68983 E.Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 93.09 Electrical Supplies 68984 Elect Air 742.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 68085 Enchanter, Inc. 3,600.00 Ocean Monitoring&Ouffall Inspection&Maintenance 68986 Stems Bank NA,for Pacific States Chemical, Inc 1,648.89 Hydrochloric Acid 68987 Excel Door&Gate Company, Inc. 603.00 Repair&Maintenance Services 68988 ENS Resources, Inc. 10,000.00 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 68989 ESRI, Inc. 6,794.46 Software License&Maintenance(Arc-View) 68990 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 3,096.39 Lab Parts&Supplies 68991 Forensic Analytical 60.00 Asbestos Analyses&Microscopy 68992 Forked Engineering&Surveying,Inc. 6,792.50 Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 68993 Franklin Covey 41.28 Office Supplies 68994 City of Fullerton 90.48 Water Use 68995 G.E.Supply 34.94 Electrical Parts&Supplies 68996 George T. Hall 1,445.52 Electrical Parts&Supplies 68997 Gerhardt's,Inc. 179.57 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 68998 Goldenwest Window Service 190.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.#990015 68999 Govemment Finance Officers Association 539.00 Membership 69WO Grainger, Inc. 3,045.06 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Tools 69001 Graybar Electric Company 82.28 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69002 Gulf Publishing 184.76 Publication 69CO3 Hach Go Ponton Industries 3,795.70 Lab Parts&Supplies 69004 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 3,600.51 Mechanical&Instrument Parts&Supplies 69005 Home Depot 406.84 Misc.Repair&Maintenance Material 69006 Horizon Technology 168.72 Lab Parts&Supplies 69007 Hub Auto Supply 225.80 Vehicle Parts&Supplies 69008 Huntington Beach Company 3,000.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 69009 City of Huntington Beach 30.77 Water Use 69010 HWA Sales 2,002.47 Instrument Parts&Supplies 69011 Idexx 4,082.37 Lab Parts&Supplies 69012 Industrial Distribution Group 3,559.76 Electrical&Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Tools 69013 Inorganic Ventures, Inc. 243.10 Lab Parts&Supplies 69014 Intratek Computer, Inc. 360.00 Network&Server Maintenance 69015 J.G.Tucker and Son, Inc. 1,740.16 Road Cones 69016 Jake's Collision 1,815.76 Truck Utility Body Repairs-V-521 69017 Jay's Catering 417.33 Meeting Expenses 69018 Jobs Available, Inc. 330.00 Notices&Ads 69019 Kabob Express 462.98 Meeting Expenses 69020 Kelly Paper 10.75 Paper 69021 Larry E. Lazorek 44.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement H:ldeptlfinlEXCEL.dto=O%APSHARE%Clafine Paid Repod%05-08%cialms Pald Report-02-15-05.xis EXHIBIT A knM1AM Pace 5 of 9 1111Inrw Claims Paid From 02101/05 to 02/16/05 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69022 Lord&Sons, Inc. 668.05 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69023 Los Alamitos General Hospital 15,996.33 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 69024 Lucci's Gourmet Foods, Inc. 262.84 Meeting Expenses 69025 Lytle Screen Printing 669.13 Printing Service-OCSD Shirts for Collection System 69026 M.J.Schiff&Associates, Inc. 556.00 Engineering Services-Corrosion Inspection of Pit.2 Bayside Sewer Pipe 69027 Managed Health Network 968.76 Employees Assistance Program 69028 MassMutual Michel Financial Group 2,056.77 Executive Disability Plan Premium 69029 Matheson Tri Gas, Inc. 5,992.42 Lab Parts&Supplies 69030 McJunkin Corporation 423.17 Plumbing Supplies 69031 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 155.09 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69032 Medlin Controls Co. 1,356.41 Instrument Supplies 69033 Megger 711.14 Instrument Repairs&Maintenance Service 69034 Metropolitan Water District of So Cal 9W.97 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 69035 Mid-West Associates 9,568.73 Pumps&Pump Parts&Supplies 69036 Miele, Inc. 194.45 Lab Parts&Supplies 69037 MWH Americas, Inc. 4,994.05 Professional Services-Santa Ana Coordinated Trunk Sewer Plan 69038 Neal Supply Co, 1,768.03 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69039 NetVersant of Southern California 2.722.63 Security System Access Control Cards 69040 New Brunswick Scientific 59.31 Lab Parts&Supplies 69041 Newark Electronics 702.03 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69042 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 554.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing, Inspection&Geotechnical Engrg. 69043 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 26.75 Steel Tags 69044 Office Depot Business Services Div. 3,000.73 Office Supplies 69045 Ohmart/VEGA Corp. 141.23 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69046 Omega Industrial Supply, Inc. 2,264.43 Janitorial Supplies 69047 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 637.20 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69M Oracle Corp. 10,055.70 Computer Service Maintenance Agreement 69049 The Orange County Register 104.99 Notices&Ads 69050 Osterbauer Compressor 5.350.06 Compressor Parts&Supplies 69051 Oxygen Service Company 1,453.93 Specialty Gases 69052 OCB Reprographics 326.81 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 69053 OCBC: Orange County Business Council 695.00 General Management Administration Meeting Registration 69054 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 395.40 Electrical Supplies 69055 Pacific Bell/WoridCom 1,854.31 Telephone Service 69056 Pacific Mechanical Supply 3,732.88 Plumbing Supplies 69057 Pageantry World, Inc. 199.97 American Flags 69058 Parker Supply Company 3,800.70 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 690M Partners Consulting Services 16,560.00 FIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 69060 PenValve 63.04 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69081 PerkinElmer LAS 13,716.00 Software Maintenance 69W2 Power Measurement USA, Inc. 1,462.50 Training Registration 69063 Primary Source Office Furnishings, Inc. 5,320.18 Office Furniture 69064 PrinterGuy 3,500.00 Printer Maintenance 69065 Prudential Overall Supply 1.479.05 Uniforms&Related Articles 69066 PCG Industries 1,200.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-High Rate Mier Pump Shaft 69067 PCS Express, Inc. 291.00 Courier Service H:1dep11Rn1EXCEL.dta12204APSHARE%CW"PaW Repo RWS-a60slnis Pald Reparl-02-15.05.)ds EXHIBIT A finnlnM Pace 6 of 9 e) o Claims Paid From 02101106 to 02115105 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69MB PSI Plastic Sales&Installation 558.67 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69089 QAir-Calif. Div.of Pump Engineering 209.53 Temperature Gauge 69070 Reliastar 10.063.00 Employee Basic Life&Managers'Insurance Premiums 69071 Ricoh Business System 1,623.90 Color Copier Lease 69072 Roto Rooter-N.O.C.#11 998.75 Repair&Maint.Services-Unplug Floor Drains at Primary Scrubbers 69073 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 893.76 Pump Supplies 69074 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 1,250.00 Engineering Services-Concrete Repairs of Scrubber Pad at Primary Scrubber System 69075 S.G.E., Inc. 260.08 Lab Parts&Supplies 69076 Safety-Kleen 533.36 Parts Washer Lease&Service 69077 Schwing America, Inc. 3,533.56 Pump Supplies 69078 Scottel Voice&Data, Inc. 2,284.80 Telephone System Maintenance 69079 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,310.35 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69080 Sioux Honey Association 1,223.06 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 69081 Skalar, Inc. 105.69 Lab Parts&Supplies 69082 Smith Pipe&Supply 170.09 Plumbing Supplies 69083 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 22,384.39 Annual Emission,Operation&Misc.Fees 69084 Southern Counties Lubricants 290.93 Grease 69085 State Water Resources Control Board 308.00 Annual Stone Water Permit 69086 Sterling Art 657.52 Drafting&Graphic Supplies 69087 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 171.17 Office Supplies 69 M Sunray Lighting, Inc. 91.51 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69089 Sunset Ford 30.92 Auto Parts&Supplies 69090 Sunset Industrial Parts 2,368.47 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69091 SCP Science 638.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 69092 SFPP,L.P. 404.28 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 69093 SKC-West, Inc. 1,088.38 Calibrator 69094 SPEC Services, Inc. 15,988.86 Engineering Services J-33-1 69095 SPX Valves&Control 6,869.39 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 89096 Tasco Pacific Fire Protection 2,446.00 Qrfly./Annual Fire Sprinkler Inspection,Maint.&Carl.at Pit. 1 &Pit.2 69097 Tekdmulics, Inc. 7,029.46 Submersible Pump&Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69098 Teletrac, Inc. 245.00 Monthly Air-Time Service Fee&Software/Hardware Maint.for Vehicle Tracking Sys. 69099 Terminix International 725.00 Pest Control 69100 Tetra Design, Inc. 18,676.00 Professional Services J-88 69101 The Walking Man, Inc. 925.00 Public Notice Printing&Melling Services for Various Projects-7-39&7-36 69102 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 13,653.60 Mechanical Supplies 69103 Time Motion Tools 1,301.51 Digital Multi-Meterwith Data Logging 69104 Time Warner Communication 51.07 Cable Services 69105 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 208.78 Locks&Keys 69106 So.Calif.Trans Service 252.94 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69107 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 1,068.94 Automotive Supplies 69108 Tuff Skin 1,275.00 Line X Coating-Upgrade Beds of(3)GMC Canyon Trucks 69109 US Filter/Polymetrics, Inc. 193.51 Service Agreement-DI Water System at Pit. 1&Pit.2 69110 Ultra Scientific 132.50 Lab Parts&Supplies 69111 United Direct Marketing 5,156.21 Public Outreach Printing&Distribution Costs&Postage Permit-Bushard Project 69112 University of Wisconsin Madison 849.00 Training Registration 69113 Verizon California 708.02 Telephone Services H:ldepilfin4EXCEL.dla12201APSHARE%Claims Patel RepoAW5.08%Clalms Pald Report-02-15-05.)ds EXHIBIT A R iiwtM Pace 7 of 9 !Uimnz;. Claims Paid From 02101106 to 02 I5105 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69114 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 9,691.08 Vision Service Premium 69115 WVR Scientific Products Corporation 1,010.06 Lab Parts&Supplies 69116 The Wackenhut Corporation 10,742.04 Security Guards 69117 Wastewater Technology Trainers 2,285.00 Training Registration 69118 Waxie Sanitary Supply 80.81 Janitorial Supplies 69119 Weber Scientific 225.82 Lab Paris&Supplies 69120 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 567.71 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69121 Western States Controls 2,380.36 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69122 Weston Solutions, Inc. 13,118.00 • Outside Laboratory Services 69123 Weyerhaeuser Co.#2 3,737.81 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 69124 WoridatWork 215.00 Membership 69125 WEF 556.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 69126 Xerox Corporation 64.79 Fax&Copier Leases 69127 Y K K(USA), Inc. 500.67 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 69128 Califomia Bank&Trust 1,664.00 Construction J-33-1A, Retention 69129 Robert M. Bell 155.75 Meet ing/TrainIng Expense Reimbursement 69130 Michael J. Boers 190.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69131 Anne H. Brandvold 122.37 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69132 Rebecca A. Brooks 150.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69133 Jeffrey Brown 204.61 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69134 Patrick B.Carnahan 113.90 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69135 James R. Davidson 49.50 Meeting/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 69136 Thomas D. DoDderer 54.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69137 Robert P.Ghirelli 875.13 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69138 Peter M. Hass 271.00 Meet ing/TrainIng Expense Reimbursement 69139 Martin A. Holl 200.44 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69140 Vladimir A. Kogan 415.76 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69141 Edwin M.Lester 495.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69142 David A. Ludwin 150.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69143 Chris Maher 155.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69144 Shane P. Milligan 44.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69145 Anthony P. Monary 145.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69146 Michael D. Moore 194.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69147 Michael N.Morey 130.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69148 Anissa C. Morgenstern 110.25 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69149 Umesh N. Murthy 225.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69150 James D. Niswonger 516.96 Meeting/freining Expense Reimbursement 69151 Cynthia A.O'Neil 100.20 Meetfng/Training Expense Reimbursement 69152 Rodney K. Petersen 195.00 Meetfng/Training Expense Reimbursement 69153 Mark S. Roberts 190.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69154 Merrill F.Seller 49.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69155 Voided Check - - 69156 Robert J.Taylor 1,567.99 Meefing/Training Expense Reimbursement 69157 Jonathan K.Thomsic 1,216.21 MeetinglTraining Expense Reimbursement 69158 Lisa L.Tcmko 100.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69159 Edward M.Torres 811.71 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement H:%dept%flnkEXCEL.dta%2201APSHARE1Gaima Paid ReporMS-081Claims Paid Report-02-16-05.ids EXHIBIT A flWn+nn� Page 8 of 9 ai�ni5lc °� Claims Paid From 02/01105 to 02115105 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69160 Morris C.Ying 358.01 Meetingffraining Expense Reimbursement 69161 Orange County Sanitation District 17,656.62 Workers Comp.Reimb. 69162 Park,Joseph W.Jr. 1,634.35 Employee Computer Loan Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 8,819,591.19 Payroll Disbursements 37071 -37156 Employee Paychecks $ 141,457.40 Biweekly Payroll 02/02/05 37157-37162 Employee Paychecks 2,130.32 Interim&Reissued Paychecks 02/08105 107854-108398 Direct Deposit Statements 1,084,324.51 Biweekly Payroll 02/02/05 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,227,912.23 Wire Transfer Payments Lloyds TBS Bank plc $ 67,964.96 Lefler of Credit Fee for Standby Certificate Purchase Agreement(11101104-02101/05) Chase Manhattan Bank 71,993.63 Commitment Fee for Series 2000 Refunding CON(11101/04-01/31/04) JP Morgan Chase Bank $ 55,568.92 January Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation JP Morgan Chase Bank 103,857.75 January Societe Generale Payment on 1993 Series Certificates of Participation OCSD Payroll Taxes&Contributions 801,029.41 Biweekly Payroll 02/02/05 Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 1,100,414.67 Total Claims Paid 02/01/05-02/15/05 $ 11,147,918.09 H:%dept%fin%EXCEL.dta1220%APSHARE%Ctaims Patel ReportWS-MCIalms Paid Report-02-15-05.)ds EXHIBIT A finnlntl. Pane 9 of 9 11IM11F Claims Paid From 02116/05 to 02128105 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 69163 American Express $ 35,858.95 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 69164 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 30,095.12 Street Resurfacing Projects 7-36&7-39 69165 So.Cal.Gas Company 37,673.98 Natural Gas 69166 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 23.75 Telephone Service 69167 City of Tustin 442.45 Water Use 69168 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 69169 Comm Vault Systems,Inc. 5,500.00 Training Registration 69170 Compressor Components of California 555.99 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69171 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 211.94 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69172 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 3,522.95 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69173 County of Orange 182.14 Wage Garnishment 69174 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 232.00 Underground Storage Tank,Hazardous Material,&State Fees 69175 Court Trustee 454.49 Wage Garnishment 69176 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 69177 Department of Child Support Services 188.50 Wage Gamishment 69178 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 9,719.96 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 69179 Court Order 445.00 Wage Garnishment 69180 FedEx Corporation 619.00 Freight Services 69181 Franchise Tax Board 100.00 Wage Garnishment 69182 Industrial Metal Supply 602.07 Metal 69183 Innerline Engineering 161.49 CCTV Videoing of Trunkline Sewers 69184 Intemal Revenue Service 300.00 Wage Garnishment 69185 Intemal Revenue Service 200.00 Wage Garnishment 69186 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,885.86 Dues Deduction 69187 Irvine Ranch Water District 4.73 Water Use 69188 IECOC 50.00 Membership(Industrial Environmental Coalition of Orange County) 69189 Leonard Elbaum c o Frey Environmental 250.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 69190 Maintenance Technology Corp. 498.36 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69191 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 5,871.73 Mechanical Supplies,Safety Locks,Small Tools,&Repair&Maint.Materials 69192 Court Osier 225.00 Wage Garnishment 69193 Motion Industries, Inc. 4,520.86 Motors 69194 National Bond&Trust 2,386.81 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 69195 NHRA-National Human Resources Assoc. 600.00 Training Registration 69196 The Orange County Register 2.694.12 Notices&Ads 69197 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 383.70 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69198 OCEA 644.86 Dues Deduction 69199 Pacific Be111WorldCom 2,353.77 Telephone Service 69200 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,611-00 Dues Deduction 69201 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,909.26 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69202 Smardan Supply Company-Fountain Valley 165.96 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69203 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 69204 Southern California Edison 9,720.94 Power 69205 State Board Of Equalization 3,499.00 Hazardous Waste Fee 69206 Summit Steel 2,159.20 Metal 69207 SBC 1,445.33 Telephone Services H:Weptlftn%EXCEL.dta%220%APSHARMiafms Pald Repor11Q&MCIalms Paid Report-02-28-05.xis EXHIBIT B swninn. Paoe 1 of 8 anrsrvra Claims Paid From 07JI6105 to 02/28/05 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69208 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 3,022.11 Motors 69209 United Way 255.00 Employee Contributions 69210 Verizon California 644.83 Telephone Services 69211 Court Order 597.50 Wage Garnishment 69212 CWEA-SARBS, Inc. 295.00 Training Registration 69213 GeomAtrix Consultants, Inc. 8,394.50 Legal Services 1-2-4 69214 SoffChoice Corp. 108.901.31 (710)Software License Agreements-Office Professional 69215 Analytical Planning Services, Inc. 2,940.00 Software-Primavera Expedition Upgrade Project 69216 Arch Wireless 2,069.44 Paging Service-Airtime,Service&Equipment 69217 Battery Specialties 179.99 Batteries 69218 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 579.01 Repairs&Maintenance Service on Winch 69219 California Recreation Company 2,386.28 Boat Slip Rental Fees for Ocean Monitoring Vessel Nerissa 69220 Compressor Components of California 6,949.88 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69221 General Petroleum 24,086.42 Lubricants&Other Related Items 69222 Industrial Distribution Group 54.96 Masking Tape 69223 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 2.000.00 Repairs&Maintenance Service-Pump Out Catch Basins at Plt.2 69224 Lord&Sons,Inc. 180.00 Freight Charges 69225 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 2,115.26 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69226 Neal Supply Co. 566.73 Plumbing Supplies 69227 OneSourco Distributors,Inc. 94.23 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69228 Oxygen Service Company 339.41 Lab Parts&Supplies 69229 R.W.Beck 2.995.42 Professional Services-FE04-20 69230 Snap-On Tools 96.64 Tools 69231 Synegi,Inc. 3,817.25 Software 69232 SPX Valves&Control 188.50 Freight Charges 69233 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 99.56 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69234 Vapex,Inc. 5,650.00 Instrument Parts&Supplies 69235 Marcus D. Dubois 789.37 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69236 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 34,162.81 Professional Services J-73-2 69237 Black&Veatch Corporation 362,231.82 Engineering Services 131-76,P1-102&J-77 69238 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 172,972.74 Engineering Services J-71-4&J-71-8 69239 CH2MHill 39,109.15 Professional Services J-40-7 69240 Fluor Enterprises, Inc. 43,954.35 Engineering Services J-84 69241 GHD,L.L.C. 53,255.00 Professional Services-Asset Management Program 69242 Irvine Technology Corporation 28,296.00 Temporary Employment Services 69243 Kemiron Companies,inc. 105,653.75 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 69244 Malcolm Pimle, Inc. 202.542.42 Professional Services P2-80 69245 MWH Americas, Inc. 107,741.62 Professional Services P2-74 69246 New Brunswick Scientific 33,206.40 Lab Parts&Supplies 69247 NRG Thermal Services,L.L.C. 141,374.31 Professional Services J-79 69248 Occidental Energy Marketing, Inc. 188,311.62 Natural Gas for CenGen/CoGen 69249 PloneerAmericas, Inc. 168,447.38 Sodium Hypochlorite 69250 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 59,530.00 Construction-PVC Pipe Rehabilitation&New Sewer Manhole 69251 Southern California Edison 136.558.24 Power 69252 Voided Check - - 69253 University of Southern California 60,000.00 Supplemental Environ. Project Re Admin.Civil Liability Complaint 118-2004-0108 H:WepH@n1EXCEL.dta%2 MAPSHAREtCW=Pald ReporW5-06%CWms Pald Report-02-28-05.xis EXHIBIT B e„ninm Pane 2 of 8 vormnc �1 Claims Paid From 02/16105 to 02128/06 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69254 ARB,Inc. 434,066.40 Construction 7-36,7-39&7-41 69255 Kiewit Pacific Co. 1,392,975.00 Construction 5-51 &5-52 69256 Union Bank of California 48,229.60 Construction 7-41,Retention 69257 A-1 Fence Company(A-1 Enterprises,Inc.) 1,419.82 Fence Repairs&Parts 69258 Absolute Standards, Inc. 60.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 69259 Accounting Options, Inc. 18,954.70 Temporary Employment Services 69260 Advance Business Graphics 5,836.81 Paper 69261 Aero Compressor,Inc. 411.63 Filter Element 69262 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1,801.59 Lab Parts&Supplies 69263 Airgas Safety 584.41 Safety Supplies 0264 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. 2,295.06 Manhole Frames&Covers 69265 American Fildelhy Assurance Company 254.90 Employee Cancer Insurance 69266 American Red Cross 36.00 CPR Training&Miscellaneous Supplies 69267 Arens Industries,Inc. 1.984.76 Instrument Parts&Supplies 69268 Ashbrook Corporation 12,001.79 Filter Press Parts&Supplies 69269 ASMS Conference 65.00 Membership 69270 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 50.28 Telephone Service 69271 AT&T Wireless Services 1,355.39 Wireless Phone Services 69272 ATCC 528.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 69273 AWSI 216.00 Department of Transportation Program Management&Testing 69274 Basic Chemical Solutions,L.L.C. 15,789.36 Sodium Bisulftte 69275 Basler Electric Company 5,205.73 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69276 Battery Specialties 798.91 Batteries 69277 Camel Financial,Inc.clo Bearing Metal 62.60 Metal 69278 Bermingham Controls 361.42 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69279 BloMerieux Vitek,Inc. 558.84 Lab Parts&Supplies 69280 Bush&Associates, Inc. 7,204.00 Professional Services 6-13-3&1-96 69281 BMC Software Company, Inc. 6,923.28 Software-Magic Client Services,Maintenance&Support 69282 BNI Building News 237.90 Publication 69283 Callan Associates, Inc. 7,200.00 Investment Advisor 69284 Carolio Engineers 23,338.92 Professional Services P2-60 69285 Certified Truck Bodies 314.44 Truck Parts&Supplies 69266 City of Fullerton 2.050.00 Construction-Adjustment of(2)Manholes to Grade 69287 Clemson University 7,790.00 Training Registration 69288 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 13.050.00 Professional Services-Preparation of NPDES Documentation 69289 Compressor Components of California 1.246.00 Mechanical Repairs&Maintenance Service 69290 Consolidated Elect.Distributors, Inc. 3,495.41 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69291 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 972.37 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69292 Cooper Cameron Corporation 3.864.16 Valves 69293 Corporate Express Imaging 640.95 Computer Supplies 69294 Corporate Express 4,402.63 Office Supplies 69295 Cortech Engineering 13,078.06 Pump Parts&Supplies 69296 County of Orange 424.79 Maint.Agreement-Repairlinsiallation of Base, Handheld&Vehicle Radios 69297 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,767.71 Electrical&Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69298 Cummins Allison Corp. 385.37 Accounting Equipment Maint.Agreement 69299 CASA 75.00 Environmental Compliance&Monitoring Meeting Registration H-.Wepllfrn%EXCEL.dta%22MAPSHAREICIalim Paid ReporMS WCWnis Pard Report-02-28-05.xls EXHIBIT B e„»ina, Pace 3 of 8 uonrvw Claims Paid From 02/16/05 to 02/28/05 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69300 CWEA 2002 Annual Conference 1,715.00 Training Registration(California Water Environment Association) 69301 CWEA Membership 388.00 Membership(Calif.Water Environment Assoc.) 69302 D&A Crane Hoist Electric 2,500.02 Electrical Repairs&Maintenance 69303 Daniel Company,L.L.C. 9,266.50 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69304 Dapper Tire Co. 720.84 Truck Tires 69305 Del Mar Analytical 1,688.00 Analysis of Biosollds and Wastewater 69306 Dwyer Instruments, Inc. 64.05 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69307 DGA Consultants, Inc. 10,454.50 Professional Services-CCTV Data Evaluation&Support 69308 Ecology Control Industries 3,716.54 Hazardous Waste Disposal 69309 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 130.00 Medical Screenings 69310 Elect Air 373.18 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69311 Emergency Management Network, Inc. 4,400.00 Training Registration 69312 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 653.10 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 69313 Employers Group 715.00 Training Registration 69314 Employment Development Dept. 6,287.00 State Unemployment Tax 69315 Enchanter, Inc. 4,500.00 Ocean Monitoring&Outfall Inspection&Maintenance 69316 Environmental Resource Associates 1,386.50 Lab Parts&Supplies 69317 Stems Bank, N.A. 1,328.13 HydrochlorlcAcid 69318 ENS Resources, Inc. 10.000.00 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 69319 ESS-Environmental Support 1,960.00 Software Maintenance 69320 FedEx Corporation 350.20 Freight Services 69321 Fisher Scientific Company 7,913.29 Lab Parts&Supplies 69322 Forked Engineering&Surveying, Inc. 9.445.00 Surveying Services P1-76,P1-102,P2-66,132-66-2&1-2-4 69323 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 42.02 Paint Supplies 69324 Franklin Covey 72.82 Office Supplies 69325 Fresco Profiles 94.50 Human Resources Background Checks 69326 Pryor Seminam/Career Track 222.00 Training Registration 69327 Fry's Electronics 243.87 Computer Supplies 69328 Ganahl Lumber Company 124.24 Lumber/Hardware 69329 Garratt-Callahan Company 1,115.53 Chemicals 69330 George Yardley Co. 1,336.96 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69331 Grainger, Inc. 10,568.64 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69332 Gmybar Electric Company 69.33 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69333 Guarantee Records Management 196.89 Off-Site Records Storage 69334 Hasker Equipment Company 74.92 Miss Vehicle,Parts,Repairs&Service 69335 Hach c/o Ponton Industries 2,076.67 Lab Parts&Supplies 69336 Harold Primrose Ice 73.50 Ice For Samples 69337 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 607.20 Plumbing Supplies 69338 Henry Company-Sealants Division 409.16 Sealer(Quick Seal) 69339 Chuck Hodge 225.00 Meeting/Trafning Expense Reimbursement 69340 Home Depot 280.27 Misc.Repair&Maintenance Material 69341 Hopkins Technical Products 1,976.30 Pump Supplies 69342 Horizon Technology 2,281.26 Lab Parts&Supplies 69343 Hummingbird Communications, Ltd. 3.335.88 Software Maintenance 69344 HDR Engineering, Inc. 2,299.59 Professional Services P2-82 69M 1.D.Industries, Inc. 31.20 Mechanical Parts&Supplies H:%dep5ffn%EXCEL.dta%22&APSHARE%Ciaims Paid ReporfZ5-=CWrr%Paid Report-02-25-05.xls EXHIBIT B fwginnr Pace 4 of 8 arenfvw ti' , A Claims Paid From 02/16105 to 02128/06 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69346 Industrial Distribution Group 2.470.67 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69347 Industrial Metal Supply 1.725.62 Metal 69348 Innedino Engineering 18,372.85 CCTV Videoing of Trunkline Sewers 69349 Irvine Ranch Water District 31.36 Water Use 69350 J&B Auto Parts 123.93 Auto Parts&Supplies 69351 J&L Industrial Supply 140.23 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 69352 J.J.Keller&Associates 745.00 On-Line Safety Management Service 69353 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 22,065.00 Professional Services 132-60 69354 Jays Catering 810.56 Meeting Expenses 69355 Johnstone Supply 1,663.18 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69356 Kelly Paper 156.51 Paper 69357 Kerr Group c/o Cornerstone Env.Assoc. 250.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 69358 Kforce Professional Staffing 28.16 Temporary Employment Services 69359 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 2,508.78 Safety Supplies 69360 Langevin Learning Services, Inc. 2,232.35 Training Registration 69361 Lawyers Title Company 750.00 Title Searches-OCSD Trunk Sewers 69362 League of CA Cities 60.00 Publication-"2005 City Directory" 69363 London Bridge Trading Co., Ltd. 1,909.97 Safety Supplies 69364 Loran Education Services 578.00 Training Registration 69365 Los Angeles Times 250.00 Notices&Ads 69366 LIMS1Letter 139.00 Subscription 69367 LINJER 10,402.41 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 69368 Mayer,Brown,Rowe&Maw,L.L.P. 5.000.00 Professional Services-Strategic Planning&Advocacy 69369 McBain Instruments 800.00 Microscope Preventive Maintenance 69370 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 731.26 Lab,Mechanical&Hardware Supplies 69371 Medlin Controls Co. 1,934.13 Instrument Supplies 69372 Mesa Laboratories, Inc. 57.00 Lab Instrument Loaner 69373 Michael Asner Consulting 9,411.65 Professional Services J-40-7 69374 Minarik 1,075.73 Instrument Supplies 69375 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 300.62 Janitorial Supplies 69376 Motion Industries, Inc. 744.87 Motor 69377 MDS Consulting 8.775.00 Professional Surveying Services 1-2-4 69378 National Plant Services, Inc. 5,245.00 Vacuum Truck Services 69379 Neal Supply Co. 226.51 Plumbing Supplies 69380 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 2.625.00 Training Registration 69381 Newark Electronics 198.30 Instrument Supplies 69382 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 8,497.75 Professional Services-Materials Testing, Inspection&Geotechnical Engrg. 69383 O C Tanner Recognition Company 1,452.86 Employee Service Awards Program 69384 Office Depot Business Services Div. 880.26 Office Supplies 69385 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 1,231.86 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69386 Orange County Chapter-ISCEBS 25.00 Employee Services Division Meeting Registration 69387 Orange County Health Care Agency 2,832.50 Underground Storage Tank,Hazardous Material,&State Fees 69388 Orange County Health Care Agency 2,314.00 Underground Storage Tank,Hazardous Material,&State Fees 69389 Orange County Pump Co. 281.53 Pump Supplies 69390 Orange County Vector Control District 187.01 Pest Control 69391 Orange County Water District 100.00 GWRS Project J-36 H:WepriFln%EXCEL.dta%22MAPSHARM[arms Paid Repad505-08%Cralms Paid Repod-02-28.05.xis EXHIBIT B nntllnllr Pace 5 of 8 yoraws Claims Paid From 02/16105 to 02128/06 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69392 Orange Courier 158.14 Courier Services 69393 Orrick,Herrington&Sutcliffe 79.32 Professional Services-Audit for Series 1993 Certificates of Participation 69394 Oxygen Service Company 1,778.88 Specialty Gases 69395 OCB Reprographics 9,408.45 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 69396 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 1,353.30 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69397 Pacific Bell/WorldCom 564.14 Telephone Service 69398 Pacific Mechanical Supply 1.009.47 Plumbing Supplies 69399 Parker Supply Company 622.82 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69400 Partners Consulting Services 15.553.00 FIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 69401 Percival Scientific 17,955.60 Lab Instruments-Environmental Chambers for Bioassay Lab 69402 Permaseal 439.62 Luba Oil 69403 Polydyne,Inc. 22,249.68 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 69404 Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. 403.65 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 69405 Primary Source Office Furnishings, Inc. 7.465.88 Office Furniture 69406 Project Management Institute 154.00 Membership 69407 Prudential Overall Supply 3,124.26 Uniforms&Related Articles 69408 PCG Industries 475.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-High Rate Mixer Pump Shaft 69409 PRSA-Orange County Chapter 75.00 Membership(Public Relations Society of America) 69410 R.F.MacDonald Co. 1,551.54 Instrument Parts&Supplies 69411 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,816.57 Trash Removal 69412 Raven Biological Laboratories 100.37 Lab Parts&Supplies 69413 Robert J. Lung&Assoc. 4,496.41 Professional Services-Aerial Photos of SARI Line 69414 Rockhurst College Continuing Education 445.00 Training Registration 69415 Royale Cleaners 23.50 Dry Cleaning Services 69416 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 26.87 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69417 RBF Engineers 7,301.41 Engineering Services 2-41 69418 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 1,200.00 Professional Services-Digesters R&S Repairs 69419 S.G.E., Inc. 32.87 Lab Parts&Supplies 69420 Sewer Equipment Company of America 193.46 Hose Supplies 69421 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 1,072.95 Janitorial&Paint Supplies 69422 Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. 1,079.64 Lab Parts&Supplies 69423 Smith Pipe&Supply, Inc. 651.56 Plumbing Supplies 69424 Smith-Emery Company 328.00 Soils,Concrete&Other Materials Testing 69425 Southern California Edison Co. 1.625.80 Extension of Electrical Distribution Line-5-51 69426 Southem Counties Lubricants 2,464.01 Engine Oil 69427 Sparing Instruments, Inc. 3,067.80 Flowmeter 69428 Spex Certiprep, Inc. 338.32 Lab Parts&Supplies 69429 Spinftar 211.25 Electrical&Hardware Supplies 69430 Strategic Diagnostics, Inc. 826.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 69431 Sunset Industrial Parts 257.28 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69432 Technical Service Group, Inc. 1,381.60 SCADA System VAX Service Agreement 69433 SBC 751.93 Telephone Services 69434 SKC-West,Inc. 4,461.42 Air Sampling Pump 69435 SPX Valves&Controls 3,068.91 Valves 69436 The Campaign Store 20.00 Legislative District Map Poster 69437 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 3,717.55 Mechanical Parts&Supplies H:ldepllftn%FXCEL.dtak22MPSHAREIClaIma Pail ReporMS-MClalms Pay!Report-02-28-0S.xla EXHIBIT B fl.Mnn, Pace 6 of 8 a+nnr5u +l Claims Paid From 02116105 to 02/28/06 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69438 Time Motion Tools 134.66 Instrument Supplies 69439 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 13,402.81 Locks&Keys 69440 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 436.00 Outside Lab Testing-AS Plant Stress Test 69441 Trusco Manufacturing Company 490.65 Instrument Parts&Supplies 69442 TCH Associates, Inc. 1,319-29 Lab Parts&Supplies 69443 TEKsystems 20,282.50 Temporary Employment Services 69444 U.S. Peroxide,L.L.C. 12,580.31 Hydrogen Peroxide 69445 U-Line 1,295-93 Office Supplies 69446 Underground Service Alert of So.Calif. 1,002.40 Membership-Underground Utility Identification/Notification Service 69447 United Pacific Services, Inc. 11,316.99 Landscape Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 and Pump Stations 69448 United Parcel Service 644.64 Parcel Services 69449 UCI Regents 1.280.07 Meeting Expenses-Engrg./Managem/Supervisom Retreat 69450 Valverde Construction, Inc. 4,710.78 Construction-Replacement of Manhole Ring&Cover at Dyer Rd Trunkline 69451 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 13,338.00 Temporary Employment Service 69452 Vossler&Company 3,337.47 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69453 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,396.15 Lab Parts&Supplies 69454 The Wackenhut Corporation 5,755.15 Security Guards 69455 Wastewater Technology Trainers 350.00 Training Registration 69456 Water 3 Engineering, Inc. 3,576.97 Engineering Services J-67 69457 Waxie Sanitary Supply 192.23 Janitorial Supplies 69458 Wayne Glass 522.50 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 69459 Weber Scientific 122.64 Lab Parts&Supplies 69460 West-Lite Supply Company, Inc. 562.13 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69461 Westport Aparatus DBA Breaker Supply 374.08 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69462 Wirth Gas Equipment Co. 1.077.50 Instrument Repairs&Calibration 69463 WEF 651.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 69464 WEFTEC 495.00 Planning Division Meeting Registration 69465 Xerox Corporation 12,718.81 Fax&Copier Leases 69466 Xyon Business Solutions, Inc. 14,920.00 Temporary Employment Services 69467 Steve Anderson 454.52 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69468 Thomas M. Blanda 1,413.47 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69469 Michael J. Boess 310.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69470 Marc A. Brown 120.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69471 Frank Chavez 190.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69472 James E.Colston 512.62 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69473 Mark A. Esquer 59.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69474 Randy E.Harris 54.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69475 Deirdre E. Hunter 545.22 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69476 Linda Losurdo 323.21 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69477 James W. Matte 1,431-00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69478 Jamiann M.Questa 216.80 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69479 James W.Silva 389.17 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimbursement 69480 Ann Tobin 240.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69481 Paula A.Zeller 642.95 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69482 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt.Dist. 3,830.93 Hearing Board Excess Emission Fee-Case 2048-10&2048-11 69483 Karen I. Baroldi 706.00 Meeting/fralning Expense Reimbursement H:ldepriflntEXCEL.dta12201APSHARE1CIaims Pald Reporr<05-061Clalms Pald Report-02-28.05.xis EXHIBIT B e.nlnn.. Paae 7 of 8 VorWu Claims Paid From 021116/0S to 02/28/05 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69484 Orange County Sanitation District 1.075.75 Petty Cash Reimb. 69485 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. 1,766.28 Hearing Board Excess Emission Fee-Case 2048-10&2048-11 69486 Timothy Avery&Dell 2,686.50 Employee Computer Loan Program 69487 Tule Ranch 228,906.30 Residuals Removal&Monitoring&Soil Testing Fees Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 5,070,529.62 Payroll Disbursements 37163-37267 Employee Paychecks $ 151,712.16 Biweekly Payroll 02/16/05 37268-37269 Employee Paychecks 4,216.72 Interim Paychecks 2/16/05&2/24/05 108399-108948 Direct Deposit Statements 1,128,737.56 Biweekly Payroll 02/16/05 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,284,666.44 Wire Transfer Payments OCSD Payroll Taxes&Contributions $ 821,954.91 Biweekly Payroll 02/16/05 U.S. Bank 157,927.38 February Interest Payment for Series 2000,A&B Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 979.882.29 Total Claims Paid 02/16/05-02/28/05 $ 7,335,078.35 H:WepAflnTXCEL.dfa%22MAPSHARE%Clalms Pald ReporMS-OMialms Paid Report-02-28-05.xla EXHIBIT B enntnn, Pane a of a anato hr v) BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 04/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number s Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance/Treasurer Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than $250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving the Orange County Sanitation District. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with the District. In general, you must disclose the basis of the conflict by identifying the name of the firm or individual who was the contributor. For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308, please see your Director's Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. SUMMARY See attached listing. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 03/01/05 to 03/15/05 and 03/16/05 to 03/31/05 C:\Documents and Setting s\Ow-Yeang\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7AA\Item 8 Claims Paid.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Claims Paid From 03101105 to 03/16105 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 69488 Bar Tech Telecom,Incorporated $ 40,000.00 Telephone Parts&Supplies 69489 Hardin Buick Pontiac GMC 74,170.29 (3)2005 GMC Canyon 2-WD Crew Cab Trucks 69490 UBS Financial Services, Inc. 28,788.44 Remarketing Fee-1992&1993 Certificates of Participation 69491 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 109.635.77 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 69492 Advance Business Graphics 109.98 Printing Services-Business Cards&Stationery 69493 Airgas Safety,Inc. 4.284.56 Safety Supplies 69494 American Training Resources,Inc. 1,071.68 Training Registration 69495 CWEA 45.90 Plaque-CWEA Collections System of the Year Award 69496 Center for Creative Growth 5,000.00 Professional Services-O&M Management Coaching 69497 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 69498 Compressor Components of California 5,301.30 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69499 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 4,251.15 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69500 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 3,012.61 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69501 County of Orange 182.14 Wage Garnishment 69502 Court Trustee 454.49 Wage Garnishment 69503 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 69504 Cronatron Welding Systems,Inc. 325-38 Welding Supplies 69505 Dell Direct Sales,L-P- 3,201-95 Computer Hardware-UPS&Associated Cabling 69506 Department of Child Support Services 188-50 Wage Garnishment 69507 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 9,719.96 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 69508 Court Order 445.00 Wage Garnishment 69509 ESRI,Inc. 1,275.00 Training Registration 69510 Franchise Tax Board 100.00 Wage Garnishment 69511 Fry's Electronics 598.99 Computer Supplies 69512 G.E-Supply 67.19 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69513 General Petroleum 2,865.01 Engine Oil 69514 Guidance Software, Inc. 1,555.29 Software,Maintenance&Support 69515 Industrial Metal Supply 770.07 Metal 69516 Internal Revenue Service 300.00 Wage Garnishment 69517 Internal Revenue Service 200-00 Wage Garnishment 69518 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,885.86 Dues Deduction 69519 [SEC,Inc. 442.00 Professional Services-FE04-15 69520 Johnstone Supply 319.94 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69521 Maintenance Technology Corp. 584.32 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69522 MarVac Electronics 15.65 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69523 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 4,418.56 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69524 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 8,566.13 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Recondition Belt Press 69525 Mini Mailers, Inc. 142.56 Processing Fees-Public Notice Mailing&Postage 69526 Court Order 225.00 Wage Garnishment 69527 National Bond&Trust 2,386.81 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 69528 National Plant Services,Inc. 8.975.00 Vacuum Truck Services 69529 Now Dimension Solutions,Inc. 12,000.00 On-Site Training-Reliability Centered Maintenance Training 69530 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 1.575.00 Training Registration 69531 Orange County North Court 664.00 Overweight Vehicle Ticket-V-470 69532 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 1,804.62 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69533 OCE4 635.61 Dues Deduction H:%depl%fln%EXCEL.dmt220%APSHARE%Ci21ms Paid Repor M5-MCIalms Pald Reporl-03-15-05.xls EXH I BIT A e,.minn,. Pane 1 of 9 ancnrve� Claims Paid From 03/01/05 to 03115/05 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69534 Pacific Bell/WoridCom 23.67 Telephone Service 69535 Paco/Johnston Pump 2,193.79 Pump 69536 Partners Consulting Services 24.060.00 FIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 69537 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,620.00 Dues Deduction,Supervisors&Professionals 69538 PenValve 227.21 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69539 PCS Express, Inc. 366.00 Courier Service 69540 PRIMA California Chapter 55.00 Membership 69641 R. L.Abbott&Associates 3,000.00 Kern County Blosolids Consulting Services 69542 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 10,974.21 Employee Life Ins. Premium,Short-Term Disability&Cancer Ins.Payroll Deductions 69543 Rockwell Engineering&Equipment Co. 14,641.17 Vaughn Chopper Pump 69544 RBF Consulting 14,602.77 Engineering Services 2-41 69545 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 193.59 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69546 Smardan Supply Company 122.22 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69547 Court Omer 721.50 Wage Garnishment 69548 SoftChoice 32.56 Software 69549 Southern California Edison 28.83 Power 69550 Summit Steel 1,081.08 Metal 69551 SBC 16.99 Telephone Services 69552 Taco Factory 133.61 Meeting Expenses P1-82 69553 Tekdraulics, Inc. 2,695.20 Submersible Pump 69554 The Walking Man, Inc. 525.00 Public Notice Printing&Mailing Services Various Projects 69555 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 10,797.05 Mechanical Parts&Maintenance Supplies 69556 Trade Service Corporation 2,191.64 Instrument Paris&Supplies 69557 United Parcel Service 1,479.17 Parcel Services 69558 United Way 255.00 Employee Contributions 69559 Valverde Construction,Inc. 9,864.27 Construction-Emergency Road Repairs to Manhole Collar(Trunkllne 7-2) 69560 Verizon California 609.86 Telephone Services 69561 Vocam USA, L.L.C. 801.48 Training Videos 69562 WEF 194.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 69563 WEFTEC 495.00 Environmental Compliance Services Division Meeting Registration 69664 Xerox Corporation 153.72 Copier Leases 69565 Court Order 597.50 Wage Garnishment 69566 James W.Matte 315.28 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69567 County of Orange 43.00 Annexation Fee 69568 County of Orange 43.00 Annexation Fee 695M Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fees 69570 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fees 69571 Orange County Fire Authority 27.76 Permit Fee-Midway City Odor&Corrosion Control Project 69572 State Board of Equalization 300.00 Annexation Fee 69573 Basic Chemical Solutions,L.L.C. 55,945.61 Sodium Bisulfite&Sodium Hydroxide 69574 Black&Veatch Corporation 85,777.16 Engineering Services P2-85,5-58,J-71-3&Pl-76 69575 Brawn&Caldwell 641,615.23 Professional Services P2-90,132-91,P1-37&1-98 69576 Carollo Engineers 52,836.00 Professional Services 132-66 69577 HDR Engineering, Inc. 186,913.17 Professional Services P1-82&P2-82 69578 IPMC c/o Parsons 982,585.00 Professional Services-Integrated Program Management 69579 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 50,565.65 Professional Services 2-41-3&P2-90 69580 Kemiron Companies,Inc. 237,314.89 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 H:Wep5fniEXCEL.dta%220WPSHARE%CW=Pald ReporMS-060alms Pald Report-03-15-05.xls EXHIBIT A4 finloinrie Pace 2 of 9 anonAq ` 0 Claims Paid From 03101/05 to 03/15105 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69581 Lee&Ro,Inc. 112,031.85 Professional Services 5-49,5-50,5-51,5-52&P2-47-3 69582 Malcolm Plmie,Inc. 71.440.80 Professional Services J-79&1-10 69583 NRG Thermal Services,L.L.C. 139,180.91 Professional Services J-79&Mechanical Supplies 69584 OCB Reprographics 31,897.27 Printing Service-MO 1126/00 69585 PioneerAmedcas, Inc. 214.858.38 Sodium Hypochlorlte 69586 Polydyne, Inc. 29,247.67 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 69587 PBS&J 76,873.29 Professional Services 3-52 69588 RBF Engineers 39,652.50 Engineering Services 2-24-1 69589 Southern California Edison 66,566.65 Power 69590 Synagro West, Inc. 330,544.12 Residuals Removal&Digester Cleaning of(4)Digesters at Plts. 1 &2 69591 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 233,275.53 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 69592 U.S.Metro Group, Inc. 26,785.00 Janitorial&Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 69593 U.S. Peroxide,L.L.C. 72,646.17 Hydrogen Peroxide 69594 Bon Air,Inc. 65,613.00 Construction FE02-62 69595 J F Shea Construction, Inc. 1,561,307.17 Construction J-35-1 &J-77 69596 J R FllancConstruction, Inc. 496,065.60 Construction P1-76 69597 Margate Construction, Inc. 204,940.00 Construction P1-37&Sump Pump Addition to Air Jumper Lines 69598 Morrow-Meadows Corp 355,082.00 Construction 132-47-3 69599 Olsson Construction,Inc. 48,896.60 Construction P2-82 69600 Southern Contracting Company 166,162.00 Construction J-33-1 69601 Torrey Pines Bank 55,118.40 Construction 131-76,Retention 69602 Abatix Environmental Corp. 483.09 Vacuum Hose Parts 69803 Ablaze Group, Inc. 1,433.75 Software Consulting Services-Seagate&Crystal Enterprise Installations 69604 Absolute Standards,Inc. 60.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 69605 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 872.67 Lab Parts&Supplies 69606 Air&Waste Management Assoc. 980.00 Environmental Compliance Services Division Meeting Registration 69607 Airco Filter Service 199.10 Natural Gas Filters 69608 Airgas Safety, Inc. 886.13 Safety Supplies 69609 American Airlines 7.086.50 Travel Services 69610 Analysts,Inc. 1.970.19 Oil Test Kits 69611 Aquarium Doctor 105.44 Human Resources Aquarium Service 69612 Aquatic Biosystems,Inc_ 520.50 Lab Parts&Supplies 69613 Arizona Instrument 659.50 Instrument Repairs,Maintenance&Calibration 69614 Awards&Trophies Company 18.69 Awards&Trophies 69615 AEHMS 55.00 Membership 69616 AIHce American Industrial Hygiene Confer 730.00 Safety&Health Division Meeting Registration 69617 ASM 640.00 Lab Administration/Quality Assurance Division Meeting Registration 69618 ASMS Conference 450.00 Employee Dove lopment/Train Ing Division Meeting Registration 69619 Barron Floor Covering 1,898.00 Flooring-Plant 2 Construction Trailer Kitchen&Men's&Women's Restrooms 69620 Basler Electric Company,Department 590 3,273.59 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69621 Battery Specialties 155.33 Rechargeable Flashlight System 69822 Black Box Corporation 882.75 Computer Hardware 69623 Boyle Engineering Corporation 16,823.70 Professional Services 1-2-4 69624 Bush&Associates,Inc. 14,888.00 Professional Services 3-52,6-13-1,7-36,7-39,7-41&11-22 69625 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 443.95 Mechanical Parts,Supplies&Service 89826 BEC-Building Electronic Controls,Inc. 625.96 Fire Alarm System Maintenance,Repair&Quarterly Inspection 69627 BMC:Business Machines Consultants, Inc. 104.87 Multifunctional Copier/Scanner Maintenance Agreement H:ldepAffn%EXCELdtal22MPSHARE%Clalms Pald Report05-O81Clalms Pald Report-03-15-05.xls EXHIBIT A fW94An. Pane 3 of 9 anonnrm Claims Paid From 03/01/05 to 03/16105 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69628 California Recreation Company 2.324.10 Boat Slip Rental Fees for Ocean Monitoring Vessel Nerissa 69629 California Relocation Services, Inc. 236.25 Office Files Moving/Relocation Services 69630 Caltrol, Inc. 224.28 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69631 Cardlock Fuel Systems, Inc. 16,040.92 Fueling District Vehicles at Local Gas Stations 69632 Chlor-Service,Inc. 1,196.84 Instrument Repair&Calibration Services 69633 Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. 2,925.00 Analysis of Wastewater,Industrial Wastewater&Biosollds 69634 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 500.00 Training Registration 69635 Compressor Components Of California 2,860.00 Mechanical Repairs&Maintenance Service 69636 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 19,725,00 Computer Maint.Agreement 69637 Consolidated Elect. Distributors,Inc. 876.20 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69638 Construction Dictionary 70.84 Publication 69639 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,502.19 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69640 Cooper Cameron Corporation 1,124.71 Engine Supplies 69641 Corporate Express 1,266.61 Office Supplies 69642 Cortech Engineering 115.34 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69643 County Wholesale Electric Co. 954.67 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69644 Crane Veyor Corp. 2,320.00 Qtrly.&Annual Inspection&Certification Services 69645 Culligan of Orange County 40.00 Maint.Agreement-Cen Gen Water Softener System 69646 Cytec Industries, Inc. 23,508.80 Anionic Polymer Spec. No.9798-18 69647 CASA 1,050.00 General Management Administration Division Meeting Registration 69648 CR&R, Inc. 1,890.00 Container Rentals 69649 CWEA 2002 Annual Conference 2,105.00 Training Registration(California Water Environment Association) 69650 Dapper Tire Co. 403.95 Truck Tires 69651 David's Tree Service 4,530.00 Tree Maint.Service 69652 Del Mar Analytical 3,892.00 Analysis of Biosollds and Wastewater 69653 Dell Computer 17,108.10 (5)PC's,(4)Projectors,(10)Printers&(50)Adapters 69654 Detection Instruments Corporation 502.14 Instrument Repairs&Calibration Services 69655 Dharma Consulting 672.00 Prof.Serv. -Strategic Planning&EMT Development Seminar 69656 DlgiPhoto 12.83 Photographic Services 69657 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 227.44 Paint Supplies 69658 Ecology Control Industries 2,176.00 Hazardous Waste Disposal 69659 Ecology Tire, Inc. 516.00 Waste Management-Tires 69660 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 655.00 Medical Screenings 69661 Electrical Reliability Services, Inc. 2,406.00 Professional Services-Electrical Acceptance Testing for Capital Projects 69662 Elmco Duddy, Inc. 1,009.53 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69663 Employers Group 2,020.00 Training Registration 69664 Enchanter, Inc. 6,150.00 Ocean Monitoring&Outfall Inspection&Maintenance 69665 Engineering Central 79.99 Notices&Ads 69666 Environmental Science Associate(ESA) 15,197.22 Professional Services J-40-10 69667 Excel Door&Gate Company, Inc. 3,858.40 Repair&Maintenance Services 69668 Experfune 1,004.00 Software Maintenance 69669 FedEx Corporation 328.89 Freight Services 69670 First American Real Estate Solutions 447.00 On-Line Orange County Property Information 69671 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 12,224.54 Lab Parts&Supplies 69672 Flo-Systems,Inc. 8,597.13 Pump Parts&Supplies 69673 Foodcraft Coffee&Refreshment Services 955.20 Meeting Supplies 69674 Forked Engineering&Surveying, Inc. 2,782.50 Engineering Services-Surveying Various Capital Projects 132-66,P1-82&1-2-4 HAdephWEXCEL,dta12201APSHARE%Clalms Paid Repor505-=Cia1ms Patd Report-03-15-05.xis EXHIBITA- e..nlnn.- Pace 4 of 9 ananms Claims Paid From 03/01/05 to 03116/06 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69675 Fountain Valley Paints, Inc. 48.92 Paint Supplies 69676 Fountain Valley Rancho Hand Wash 297.40 Truck Wash Tickets or Gasoline 69677 Franklin Covey 562.19 Office Supplies 69678 Fry's Electronics 26.41 Computer Supplies 69679 FLW, Inc. 47.77 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69680 Garig Equipment&Maintenance 1,276.26 Pump&Pump Parts 69681 Garratt-Callahan Company 1,936.92 Chemicals 69682 Gates Fiberglass Installers 1,734.88 Repair&Maintenance Services of Pipe at Primary Basin 69683 General Petroleum 5,207.46 Bulk Order Oil 69684 George T. Hall 3.050.43 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69685 George Yardley Co. 301.70 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69686 Gold Coast Awards, Inc. 15.24 District Badge 69687 Golden Bell Products 9,471.00 Contractual Services-Insecticide Coating of Manholes 69688 Goldenwest Window Service 2,355.00 Landscape Clean-Up-Various Areas 69689 Grainger, Inc. 1,844.43 Electrical&Mechanical Parts&Tools 69690 Graybar Electric Company 40.12 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69691 Gyrus Systems 6,710.00 Training Wizard Software Licenses 69692 Harold Primrose Ice 55.50 Ice For Samples 69693 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 798.99 Plumbing Supplies 69694 Harvard University 5,200.00 Training Registration 69695 Herman Miller Workplace Resource 1,112.75 Furniture&Fixtures 69696 Hilti,Inc. 1,115.23 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69697 Home Depot 460.73 Misc.Repair&Maintenance Material 69698 Hopkins Technical Products 1,348.84 Pump Supplies 69699 Hub Auto Supply 1,402.00 Vehicle Parts&Supplies 69700 City of Huntington Beach 11,585.98 Water Use 69701 HI Standard Automotive 481.16 Automotive Parts&Service 69702 Industrial Distribution Group 5,010.61 Mechanical Paris,Supplies,Tools&Paint 69703 Industrial Filter Manufacturers, Inc. 1,988.46 Filters 69704 Industrial Metal Supply 402.83 Metal 69705 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 1,654.99 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69706 Inplant Sales,L.L.C. 202.85 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69707 Interstate Batteries of Cal Coast 1,904.10 Batteries for Vehicles&Carts 69708 Iron Mountain 283.51 Bid Document Storage Fees P1-37&Secure Shredding Service 69709 ISA 85.00 Membership 69710 J&B Auto Parts 350.58 Auto Parts&Supplies 69711 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc. 5.195.11 Mechanical Parts&Safety Supplies 69712 Jay's Catering 3.844.59 Meeting Expenses 69713 Jobs Available, Inc. 206.25 Notices&Ads 69714 Johnstone Supply 272.41 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69715 Kabob Express 230.65 Meeting Expenses P1-82 69716 Kathco Products 1,768.02 Safety Supplies 69717 Knowledge Point 4.027.00 On-Site Training-Performance Now Impact Training 69718 Lab Safety Supply, Inc. 4.777.53 Safety Supplies 69719 Labeltroni x 382.00 Repair&Maintenance Services 69720 League of California Cities 392.00 Publication 69721 Los Angeles Times 2,210.00 Notices&Ads H:WepQfln%EXCEL.drak22MPSHARE%Ctatms Pa!d RepoMS-O 1Cratms Pa!d Report-03A5-05.x!s EXHIBIT A e,.n+nm Pane 5 of 9 anc»nnF Claims Paid From 03101/06 to 03/16/05 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69722 Linda Losurdo 700.00 MeetinglTraining Expense Reimbursement 69723 LECO Corporation 13,835.10 Lab Software Maintenance-Pegasus 3144 69724 M.J.Schiff&Associates, Inc. 1,364.00 Permit Cost for Soil Sample Drilling 69725 Mandic Motors 152.50 Towing Services 69726 Marinus Scientific 65.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 69727 MaAfac Electronics 21.44 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69728 Matt Chlor, Inc. 474.91 Valves 69729 Mayer,Brown, Rowe&Maw, L.L.P. 5,000.00 Professional Services-Strategic Planning&Advocacy 69730 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 181.46 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69731 Medlin Controls Co. 1,420.39 Instrument Supplies 69732 Metal Supply, Inc. 667.06 Piping 69733 Morton Salt 840.54 Salt 69734 Motion Industries, Inc.CA 55 1.395.70 Motor&Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69735 MAG-TROL, Inc. 2,053.97 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69736 MDS Consulting 1,755.00 Professional Surveying Services 1-2-4 69737 MWH Americas, Inc. 9,521.36 Professional Services-Hydraulic Model Sewer Study-City of Santa Ana 69738 Neal Supply Co. 1,765.99 Plumbing Supplies 69739 NetVersant of Southern California 3,802.83 Security System Maintenance 69740 New Dimension Solutions, Inc. 8,000.00 On-Site Training-Reliability Centered Maintenance Training 69741 City of Newport Beach 160.79 Water Use 69742 Nextel Communications 772.86 Cellular Phones&Air Time 69743 Niagara Plumbing 220.31 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69744 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 1.712.32 Industrial Turbine Oil 69745 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 1,836.00 Professional Services-Materials Testing, Inspection&Geotechnical Engrg. 69746 The Norco Companies 208.86 Mail Delivery Service 69747 NAFA, Inc. 550.00 Books&Publications 69748 Office Depot Business Services Div. 3,456.57 Office Supplies 69749 Ohmart/VEGACorp. 1,275.00 Training Registration 69750 OneSouroe Distributors,Inc. 4,318.03 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69751 The Orange County Register 5,241.40 Notices&Ads 69752 Orange Courier 30.44 Courier Services 69753 Osterbauer Compressor 115.91 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69754 Oxygen Service Company 2,062.57 Specialty Gases 69755 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 18.10 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69756 Pacific Bell/ WorldCom 1,166.87 Telephone Service 69757 Pacific Mechanical Supply 215.55 Plumbing Supplies 69758 Pacific Parts&Controls, Inc. 199.28 Repair&Maintenance Material 69759 Parker Hannifin Corporation 546.70 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69760 Parker Supply Company 2,673.90 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69761 Partners Consulting Services 9,120.00 FIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 69762 Port Supply 440.23 Port Electrical Supplies 69763 Propipe 1,116.49 CCTV Sewerline Inspection 7-41 69764 Prudential Overall Supply 4,889.78 Uniforms&Related Articles 69765 PAPA 55.00 Training Registration 69766 PCG Industries 425.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-High Rate Mixer Pump Shaft 69767 RCS Express,Inc. 198.50 Courier Service 69768 Quinn Shepherd Machinery 638.14 Fuel Filters H:tdepttfln%EXCEL.dta%220%APSHARE%Clalms Paid ReporMS-MClalms Paid Report-03-15-05.x1s EXHIBIT A e,.ninn.. Paae 6 of 9 xncnN�S Claims Paid From 03/01/05 to 03/15/05 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69769 Radius Maps 1,225.00 Radius Map&Ownership Listings 69770 Lawrence Ragan Communications, Inc. 795.00 Training Registration 69771 Reilly&Associates 5,980.39 Investigative Human Resources Services 69772 Restek Corp. 195.42 Lab Parts&Supplies 69773 Rockwell Automation-Entek 6,270.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69774 Royale Cleaners 12.00 Dry Cleaning Services 69775 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 66.01 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69776 RD Instruments 889.64 Batteries 69777 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 16,060.00 Engineering Services FE04-35 69778 Safety Design,Inc. 2,565,25 Loto Panel Devices 69779 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 24,175.00 Construction-Manhole Rehabilitation Program 69780 Schwing America, Inc. 953.37 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69781 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 13,834.67 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 69782 Scientific Refrigeration 510.00 Moving&Disposal of Refrigerator 69783 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 1,700.10 Mechanical&Paint Supplies&Tools 69784 Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. 183.99 Lab Parts&Supplies 69785 SkillPath Seminars 798.00 Training Registration 69786 Smith Pipe&Supply, Inc. 102.06 Plumbing Supplies 69787 Smith-Emery Company 1,068.20 Soils,Concrete&Other Materials Testing 69788 Snap-On Tools, Inc. 2,990.94 Tool Box 69789 Southem California Water 86.71 Water Use 69790 Southwest Scientific, Inc. 3,799.98 Instrument Supplies 69791 Sparkletts 1,580.61 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 69792 St Croix Sensory,Inc. 2,940.00 Outside Laboratory Services 69793 Stockstill Communications 5,000.00 Prof.Seer.-Great Park Strategic Planning 69794 Summit Steel 128.70 Metal 69795 Sunset Industrial Parts 110-12 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69796 System Improvements 995.00 Training Registration 69797 SBC 697.35 Telephone Services 69798 SBC Long Distance 1.854.09 Long Distance Telephone Services 69799 SCCWRP 120.00 Training Registration 69800 South Coast Environmental Co. 16,396.14 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service 69801 SETAC 155.00 Membership 69802 SPEC Services, Inc. 869.38 Engineering Services SP-94 69803 Tekdraulics, Inc. 2,947.79 Submersible Pump 69804 Terminix International 1,200.00 Pest Control 69805 The Cultured Abalone 433.76 Lab Parts&Supplies 69806 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 5,650.87 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69807 ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corporation 1,280.00 Elevator Maintenance 69808 Time Warner Communication 51.07 Cable Services 69809 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 230.46 Locks&Keys 69810 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 492.63 Automotive Supplies 69811 Tuthill Energy Systems 264.56 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69812 TCH Associates, Inc. 1,902.76 Lab Parts&Supplies 69813 US Filter Corp. 1,543.66 Service Agreement-DI Water Systems at Plants 1 &2 69814 U.S Postal Service(AMS-TMS) 5,000.00 Postage 69815 Ultra Scientific 136.80 Lab Parts&Supplies H:WaprittnlEXCEL.dta%22MPSHARE1Clafms Peld ReporM9-081CIatms Pald Report-03-15-05.xis EXHIBIT A n,.194nn,. Paae 7 of 9 �nonrvK Claims Paid From 03101/05 to 03/16/05 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69816 Underground Service Alert of So.Calif. 1,338.40 Membership-Underground Utility Identification/Notification Service 69817 United Pacific Services, Inc. 810.00 Landscape Maintenance at Plants 1&2 and Pump Stations 69818 United Parcel Service 27.00 Parcel Services 69819 UC Regents 1,245.00 Training Registration 69820 US Equipment Co., Inc. 307.91 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69821 USA Supply, Inc. 241.46 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69822 Valln Corporation 542.63 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69823 Vapex, Inc. 1,315.00 Instrument Parts&Supplies 69824 Varian, Inc. 5,287.04 Lab Parts&Supplies 69825 Verizon California 708.02 Telephone Services 69826 Verve's Plumbing 7,529.20 Repairs&Maint.Services-Install Backflow Devices&Water Meter&Repair Leak 69827 Vortex Industries, Inc. 4,520.02 Repairs&Maint.Services-Purchasing Building Window Flashing 69828 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 5,752.88 Lab Parts&Supplies 69829 The Wackenhut Corporation 14,792.23 Security Guards 69830 Water 3 Engineering, Inc. 6,966.25 Engineering Services J-67 69831 Waxie Sanitary Supply 925.16 Janitorial Supplies 69832 Wesco DWribition,Inc. 149.00 Electrical Supplies 69833 West-Lice Supply Company, Inc. 746.45 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69834 Western States Controls 202.56 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69835 Winzler&Kelly Consulting Engineers 540.00 Permit Fee-Asbestos Floor Tile Removal in Bldg. 14 69836 Woods Hole Group, Inc. 1,600.00 Professional Services-Ocean Monitoring Program 69837 WEF-Registration Dept. 495.00 Planning Division Meeting Registration 69838 WEF 1,681.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 69839 WQI 500.00 Training Registration 69840 Yale/Chase Materials Handling, Inc. 360.21 Automotive Parts&Supplies 69841 Zee Medical 1,663.55 First Aid Supplies 69842 1-800-Conference(R) 238.86 Telephone Conference Calls 69843 California Bank&Trust 8,745.00 Construction J-33-1A, Retention 69844 Orange Community Bank 5,433.00 Construction 112-82,Retention 69845 Kenneth W.Aplon Jr. 441.22 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69846 Emilio Ariston 54.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69847 Mark S. Boyd 679.15 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69848 Antonio Briseno 55.00 Meetinglrraining Expense Reimbursement 69849 Jeffrey Brown 133.78 Meetinglrraining Expense Reimbursement 69850 Peter H. Brown 80.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69851 Peter Cheffs 49.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69852 George R.Crawford 300.94 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69853 Bernardo DeAnda 725.41 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69854 Michele Farmer 562.71 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 69855 Chuck Hodge 851.62 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69856 Deirdre E. Hunter 1,404.34 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 69857 Tod H.Jacobson 281.66 Meetinglrraining Expense Reimbursement 69858 Pamela A.Koester 723.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69859 Lille Kovac 199.00 Meeting/training Expense Reimbursement 69860 David A. Ludwin 240.00 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 69861 Michael D.Moore 223.00 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement 69862 James C.Mullins 446.39 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement H.Wphfln%EXCEL.dta1220%APSHARE%Claims Pald Reporf05-08l Wrm Pad Report-03-15-M XIS EXHIBIT A a.mnn� Pace 8 of 9 anorMlVla C/ + Claims Paid From 03101105 to 03115105 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69863 Umesh N. Murthy 523.05 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69864 Roy Parrino 54.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69865 Michael Vuong 526.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69866 Simon L.Watson 553.86 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69867 Walter W.Williams 59.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69868 Mark S.Wilson 151.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 69869 Morris C.Ying 1,043.50 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 69870 Orange County Sanitation District 13,947.24 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 69871 Orange County Sanitation District 996.02 Petty Cash Reimb. 69872 RMS Engineering&Design, Inc. 750.00 Engineering Services 132-66-2 69873 Santiago Creek Greenway Alliance 100.00 Booth Application Fee-2nd Annual Creek Week 69874 UC Regents 125.00 Booth Application Fee-UCI Earth Day Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 7,778,603.15 Payroll Disbursements 37270-37356 Employee Paychecks $ 143,132.94 Biweekly Payroll 03/02/05 37357-37359 Employee Paychecks 2,540.48 Interim Paychecks 108949-109490 Direct Deposit Statements 1,082,293.98 Biweekly Payroll 03/02/05 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,227,967.40 Wire Transfer Payments JP Morgan Chase Bank $ 56,284.48 February Interest Payment on Series 1993 Certificates of Participation JP Morgan Chase Bank 103,016.74 February Societe Generale Payment on 1993 Series Certificates of Participation OCSD Payroll Taxes&Contributions 800,801.38 Biweekly Payroll 03/02/05 Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 960,102.60 Total Claims Paid 03101/05-03/16/05 $ 9,966,673.15 H:%dep11M1EXCEL.dta%22MPSHAREtClaInm Paid ReportW5-060alms Paid Report-0315-05.x1s EXHIBIT A s,.ninn.. Pace 9 of 9 ananrvK Claims Paid From 03116/05 to 03/31105 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 69875 American Express $ 30,943.60 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 69876 City of Orange 187,000.00 Cooperative Projects Reimbursement Program 69877 So.Cal.Gas Company 31,008.23 Natural Gas 69878 UBS Financial Services, Inc. 36,766.73 Remarketing Fee-2000"A"&"B"Refunding Certificates of Participation 69879 Airgas Safety, Inc. 6,429.08 Safety Supplies 69880 AT&T Universal Biller 282.95 Telephone Service 69881 Cardlock Fuel Systems, Inc. 14,837.36 Fueling District Vehicles at Local Gas Stations 69882 Court Order 150.00 Wage Gamishment 69883 Compressor Components Of Califomla 5.291.71 Mechanical Repairs&Maintenance Service-Shaft 89884 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 2,141.41 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69885 Corporate Express 768.07 Office Supplies 69886 County of Orange 182.14 Wage Garnishment 69887 Court Trustee 454.49 Wage Garnishment 69888 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Gamishmeni 69889 CEM Corporation 387.30 Lab Parts&Supplies 69890 Cobb, Keith&Katherine 1,017.81 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 69891 CRC Press, Inc. 300.06 Publication 69892 CWEA 2002 Annual Conference 3,557.00 Training&Meeting Registration(Calif.Water Environment Assoc.) 69893 Department of Child Support Services 188.50 Wage Gamishment 69894 Driver Alliant Insurance Service, Inc. 4,219.00 Crime Insurance Renewal 69895 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc 9,719.96 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 69896 Court Order 445.00 Wage Garnishment 69897 Environmental Resolutions, Inc. 26.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 69898 F H Pumps, Inc. 857.79 Pump Supplies 69899 FileNET Corporation 250.00 Training CD-Content Services 69900 Foodcraft Coffee&Refreshment Services 740.83 Meeting Supplies 69901 Franchise Tax Board 100.00 Wage Garnishment 69902 Govemment Finance Officers Association 35.00 Membership 69903 Industrial Distribution Group 614.80 Oil,Grease&Small Tools 69904 Industrial Metal Supply 770.02 Metal 69905 Intemal Revenue Service 300.00 Wage Gamishment 69906 Internal Revenue Service 200.00 Wage Garnishment 69907 Intl Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,904.80 Dues Deduction 69908 Irvine Ranch Water District 3.90 Water Use 69909 IEEE-Institute of Electrical&Electronics 1,900.62 Membership&CO-Power System Relaying Collections 69910 Knowledge Point 4,027.00 On-Site Training-Impact Now 69911 Kroko,Peter 943.26 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 69912 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1,834.52 Misc.Repair&Maintenance Material&Tools 69913 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 4,848.75 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69914 Moody's Investor's Service 5,000.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees-Series 1992 Refunding COP's 69915 Court Order 225.00 Wage Garnishment 69916 National Bond&Trust 2.386.81 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 69917 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 116.94 Electrical Parts&Supplies 69918 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 34.12 Lab Parts&Supplies 69919 Oxygen Service Company 464.95 Specialty Gases H tdeptWIMEXCEL.dta%220WPSHARE%CWrr%Pald ReporMi-W%Clalms Pald Report-03-31-05.x1s EXHIBIT B ewninn,. Paoe 1 of 12 arIannu Claims Paid From 03116/05 to 03131/06 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69920 OCEA 478.36 Dues Deduction 69921 Partners Consulting Services 17,820.00 FIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 69922 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,620.00 Dues Deduction,Supervisors&Professionals 69923 Pacaud,Garth 844.22 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 69924 PAPA 55.00 Training Registration 69925 Progressive Business Compliances 9.50 Publication 69926 R A Plumbing&Drains 2,192.67 Removal&Installation of Sink at Control Center Lunchroom 69927 Nicelio Sanchez 1,017.81 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 69928 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 20,087.50 Construction-Manhole Rehabilitation Program 69929 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,003.55 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69930 Smardan Supply Company-Fountain Valley 252.42 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 69931 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 69932 Snap-On Tools, Inc. 5,152.49 Tool Cabinet 69933 Starbuc k Truck Refinishing, Inc. 770.00 Vehicle Parts,Supplies&Installation-V-292 69934 Summit Steel 4,257.34 Metal 69935 SBC 1,564.53 Telephone Services 69936 SBC/MCI 1,280.51 Telephone Services 69937 SPX Valves&Control 6,088.67 Valves 69938 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 5,103.10 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69939 The Unisource Corporation 428.64 Office Supplies 69940 United Way 255.00 Employee Contributions 69941 Verizon California 643.98 Telephone Services 69942 Waxie Sanitary Supply 1,171.14 Janitorial Supplies 69M Court Order 597.50 Wage Garnishment 699" Archie,Stephanie&Dell 800.83 Employee Computer Loan Program 69945 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 945.00 Administrative Fee for Adjustments to Property Tax Bills 69946 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 810.00 Administrative Fee for Adjustments to Property Tax Bills 69947 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,365.00 Administrative Fee for Adjustments to Property Tax Bills 69948 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 1,275.00 Administrative Fee for Adjustments to Property Tax Bills 69949 Miles, Patrick B. 1,895.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 69950 Black&Veatch 203,690.66 Engineering Services J-102 69951 Black&Veatch Corporation 61,565.83 Engineering Services P2-85,5-58,J-77&J-71-3 69952 Blue Cross of California 343,054.15 Medical Insurance Premium 69953 Brown&Caldwell 122,777.06 Professional Services CMOMNVDR 69954 Camp Dresser&McKee, Inc. 147,258.10 Engineering Service J-71-8 699M Carollo Engineers 140,956.40 Professional Services P2-60&P2-66 69956 Delta Dental 56,241.51 Dental Insurance Plan 6907 E.I. Du Pont De Nemcurs and Company 70,129.00 Paint Maint.Services MO 4-22-98&Misc.Cleaning&Maintenance Projects 69958 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 27,349.12 Long-Tenn&Short-Term Disability Ins. Premium 69959 GHD,L.L.C. 58,500.00 Professional Services-Asset Management Program 69M Hill Brothers 38,349.88 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkiine 69961 HDR Engineering, Inc. 200,659.70 Engineering Services P1-82&112-82 69962 Irvine Technology Corporation 31,552.00 Temporary Employment Services 69963 IPMC c/o Parsons 926,897.00 Professional Services-Integrated Program Management 69864 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 61,709.21 Medical Insurance Premium 69965 Kemiron Companies, Inc. 95,526.59 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 H:%depnEniEXCEL.dta122MAPSHARE%Clafrm Paid ReporW5-WCWYm Pald Reporl-03-31-05.xts EXHIBIT B n,.171nn, Pace 2 of 12 ei+anrLia Claims Paid From 03116/06 to 03131/06 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69M Lee&Ro,Inc. 74,846.37 Professional Services 5-49,5-50,5-51 &5-52 69967 Malcolm Pimie,Inc. 246,396.43 Professional Services 132-80,J-79&11-26 69968 MWH Americas,Inc. 144,223.49 Professional Services 132-74 69969 Occidental Energy Marketing, Inc. 181,790.70 Natural Gas for CenGen/CcGen 69970 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 72,242.62 Sodium Hypochlorite 69971 Polydyne, Inc. 72.209.26 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 69972 Primary Source Office Furnishings, Inc. 32,862.05 Office Furniture 69973 PBS&J 32,611.89 Professional Services 3-52 69974 RemedyTemp, Inc. 74,986.35 Temporary Employment Services 69975 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 62,095.00 Engineering Services P2-66-2&FE04-35 69976 S&L International, Inc. 37,247.46 Software&Maintenance-Websense 69977 Synagro West, Inc. 284,262.65 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 69978 Tula Ranch/Magan Farms 240,819.96 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 69979 U.S. Peroxide,L.L.C. 355,416.55 Odor&Corrosion Control Treatment for Coll.Sys.;Hydrogen Peroxide 69980 Waste Markets Corp. 45,188.98 Maint.Agreement-Grit&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Mat'I. Removal 69981 ARB,Inc. 937,295.10 Construction 7-36&7-41 69982 Kiewit Pacific Co. 227,925.00 Construction 5-51 &5-52 69983 Steve P Rados, Inc. 299,060.10 Construction 1-2-4 69984 Union Bank of California 104,143.90 Construction 7-39&7-41,Retention 69985 Union Bank of California 33,228.90 Construction 1-2-4, Retention 69986 Accounting Options,Inc. 16,986.43 Temporary Employment Services 69987 Ace Ergonomics 1,310.84 Professional Services-Ergonomic Workstation Evaluations 69988 Advance Business Graphics 607.47 Printing Services-Business Cards 69989 Airoo Filter Service 3,099.97 Air Filters 69990 Airgas-West 1.424.05 Specialty Gases 69991 Airgas Safety,Inc. 1,520.12 Safety Supplies 69992 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. 1,196.03 Manhole Frames&Covers 69993 AIIMed, Inc. 82.92 Ergonomic Computer Supplies 69994 Alta-Robbins, Inc. 111.48 Instrument Supplies 69995 American Chemical Society 149.00 Membership 699N American Fildelity Assurance Company 264.90 Employee Cancer Insurance 69997 American Public Works Association 417.50 Notices&Ads 69998 American Training Resources, Inc. 538.31 Training Videos 69999 Analytical Products Group,Inc. 530.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 70000 Appleone Employment Service 204.30 Temporary Employment Services 70001 Aquarium Doctor 110.83 Human Resources Aquarium Service 70002 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs, Inc. 3,000.00 Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing 70003 Aquatic B'rosystems,Inc. 944.75 Lab Parts&Supplies 70004 Ashbrook Corporation 4,311.65 Filter Press Parts&Supplies 70005 APWA 135.00 Support Services Division Meeting Registration 70006 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 50.80 Telephone Service 70007 AT&T Wireless Services 1,408.20 Wireless Phone Services 70008 AWPCA-Arizona Water&Pollution Ctri. 30.00 Membership 70009 AWSI 226.00 Department of Transportation Program Management&Testing 70010 Baker Tanks 560.00 Tank Rentals 70011 Bar Tech Telecom,Incorporated 2.112.13 Telephone Equipment H:WeptltfnlEXCEL.dta1220%APSHARE1Clalms Paid Report105.080alms Pald Report-03-31-05.xfs EXHIBIT B snn4nm. Pane 3 of 12 A14QMM Claims Paid From 03/16105 to 03/31/05 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 70012 Basic Chemical Solutions,L.L.C. 17,486.38 Sodium Bisulfite&Sodium Hydroxide 70013 Battery Specialties 347.56 Batteries 70014 Camel Financial, Inc.c/o Bearing Metal 336.88 Metal 70015 Bentley Systems, Inc. 4,445.08 Software Maint. 70016 Berge's Governor Service 2,191.49 Repair&Maint.Services-Governor 70017 BloMerieux Vitek, Inc. 559.62 Lab Parts&Supplies 70018 Blue Marlin Group 383.59 Boat Parts&Supplies 70019 Burke Engineering Co. 377.88 Electrical Parts&Supplies 70020 BEC-Building Electronic Controls, Inc. 595.00 Fire Alarm System Maintenance, Repair&Quarterly Inspection 70021 Blactcbum Mfg.Co. 71.51 'Repair&Maintenance Materials&Supplies 70022 BNI Building News 331.25 Publication 70023 Califomia Auto Collision 2,267.83 Auto Body Repair-V-464 70024 Southern Califomia Marine Institute 13,774.00 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 70025 Cappo, Inc. 550.00 Membership 70026 Center for Creative Growth 500.00 Professional Services-O&M Management Coaching 70027 Chapman Counseling 10,000.00 Facilitation Services-Division 820 Seminar 70028 Charts, Inc. 1,079.39 Charts 70029 Coast Fire Equipment 1,160.16 Fire Extinguishers 70030 Columbia Analytical Services,Inc. 270.00 Analysis of Wastewater, Industrial Wastewater&Biosolids 70031 Communications Performance Group,Inc. 11,350.00 Professional Services-Preparation of NPDES Documentation 70032 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 11,733.38 Computer Maint.Agreement 70033 Computer Sciences Corp. 19,341.24 Consulting&Lab Services-Assay Pilot Project 70034 Consolidated Elect, Distributors, Inc. 3,994.42 Electrical Parts&Supplies 70035 Cooper Cameron Corp. 1,493.24 Engine Supplies 70036 Corporate Express 2.419.93 Office Supplies 70037 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 168.00 Custodial Services Spec. No.9899-09 70038 County of Ventura 16,725.00 Membership 70039 County Wholesale Electric Co. 778.13 Electrical Parts&Supplies 70040 Culligan of Orange County 40.00 Maint.Agreement-Can Gen Water Softener System 70041 Cytec Industries, Inc. 2,531.87 Anionic Polymer Tote-Plant 1 70042 Cytec Industries, Inc. 24,718.40 Anionic Polymer Spec. No.9798-18 70043 CASA 1,275.00 GM Administration&Environ.Compliance Services Divisions Meeting Registration 70044 CEM Corporation 182.58 Lab Parts&Supplies 70045 CH2MHill 1,062.39 Professional Services-Evaluation of Spill&Power Outage of 9/9/04 70M CR&R, Inc. 945.00 Container Rentals 70347 CWEA 495.00 O&M Regional Assets&Services Division Meeting Registration 70048 CWEA 2002 Annual Conference 1,120.00 Training Registration(California Water Environment Association) 70049 CWEA Membership 485.00 Membership(Calif.Water Environment Assoc.) 70050 David's Tree Service 1,800.00 Tree Maint.Service 70051 De Guelle Glass Co., Inc. 2.433.12 Window Repairs 70052 Del Mar Analytical 8,066.00 Analysis of Biosol€ds and Wastewater 70053 Don Wolf&Associates, Inc. 480.00 Training Registration 70054 Drs. Foster&Smith,Inc. 51.97 Lab Parts&Supplies 70055 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 151.11 Paint Supplies 70056 DGA Consultants, Inc. 5,204.00 Professional Services-CCTV Data Evaluation&Support 70057 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 625.80 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care H:Wep5RnlEXCEL.dta%22MPSHARE1Cl21ms Pald ReporNk&W%Clalms Paid Report-03.31-05.xls EXHIBIT B fFnM4nnn Page 4 of 12 d140M U 4) � Claims Paid From 03/18105 to 03/31/06 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 70058 Employers Group 715.00 On-Site Lead Training-Managing Priorities&Projects 70059 Enchanter,Inc. 3.600.00 Ocean Monitoring&Outfall Inspection&Maintenance 70060 Environmental Resource Association 1,386.50 Lab Parts&Supplies 70061 Environmental Science Associate(ESA)' 916.52 Professional Services J-40-10 70062 ETAC-Environmental Training and Compli. 80.00 Employee Development Division Meeting Registration 70063 Steams Bank, N.A. 2.447.54 Hydrochloric Acid 70064 Excel Door&Gate Company, Inc. 2,668.75 Repair&Maintenance Services 70065 EIMCO Water Technologies 2,820.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 70066 ESRI,Inc. 23,136.29 Software Maintenance 70087 FedEx Corporation 462.68 Freight Services 70068 First American Real Estate Solutions 357.50 On-Line Orange County Property Information 70069 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 3,316.03 Lab Parts&Supplies 70070 Fluid Dynamics 56.12 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 70071 Forensic Analytical Specialists 50.00 Asbestos Analyses&Microscopy 70072 Forked Engineering&Surveying, Inc. 2,375.00 Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects P1-76&P1-102 70073 Franklin Covey 204.78 Office Supplies 70074 Frasco Profiles 845.00 Human Resources Background Checks 70075 Full Spectrum Analytics 8,084.32 Lab Instrument Repairs&Maintenance Service 70076 FUR Systems, Inc. 21,528.53 Infrared Imaging System&Accessories 70077 Geomatrb(Consultants,Inc. 1,590.00 Professional Services-Soils,Concrete&Other Materials Testing 70078 George Yardley Co. 1,137.84 Heater, Enclosure&Thermostats 70079 Gerhardt's,Inc. 7,747.66 Spark Plugs-Cen Gen 70080 Getinge Castle 162.73 Lab Parts&Supplies 70081 Gierlich-Mitchell,Inc. 1,224.04 Submersible Pump 70082 Goldenwest Window Service 76.00 Window Cleaning Service-Spec.#990015 70083 Grainger, Inc. 4,156.82 Electrical Parts&Supplies 70084 Graybar Electric Company 8,679.88 Electrical Parts&Supplies 70085 Guarantee Records Management 587.17 Off-Site Records Storage 70086 Hach cJo Ponton Industries 2,845.84 Instrument Parts,Supplies&Chemicals 70087 Hagemeyer North America 4,822.81 Proscription Safety Glasses 70088 Harold Primrose Ice 30.00 Ice For Samples 70089 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 33.83 Plumbing Supplies 70090 Hilti,Inc. 457.94 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 70091 Home Depot 669.07 Misc.Repair&Maintenance Material 70092 Hopkins Technical Products 6,823.48 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 70093 Hotsy Equipment Company 579.49 Repair Hot Water Pressure Washer 70094 Howard Ridley Company 1,325.00 Digester Repair 70095 Hub Auto Supply 267.00 Vehicle Parts&Supplies 70096 Hummingbird Communications, Ltd. 792.77 Software Maint. 70097 HI Standard Automotive 49.40 Automotive Parts&Supplies 70098 Idexx 2,004.15 Lab Parts&Supplies 70099 Impulse 289.97 Replacement of Cable Terminations 70100 Industrial Distribution Group 2,891.55 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 70101 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 4,840.37 Fasteners 70102 Inorganic Ventures,Inc. 269.28 Lab Parts&Supplies 70103 Ionics Instrument Business Group 1,451.08 Instrument Repairs&Maintenance H:Wapriffn%EXCEL.dta%22MAPSHARE%Claims Paid ReporIT5-061Clalms Pald Report-03-31-05.xts EXHIBIT B m.P)Ml. Pace 5 of 12 m+anma Claims Paid From 03/16105 to 03/31105 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 70104 Irvine Pipe&Supply 52.38 Valve Parts 70105 Isco, Inc. 397.90 Lab Parts&Supplies 70106 IECOC 22.00 Training Registration 70107 ISA 85.00 Membership 70108 J&B Auto Parts 194.03 Auto Paris&Supplies 70109 J&L Industrial Supply 1,419.63 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 70110 Jay's Catering 93.49 Meeting Expenses 70111 Johnstone Supply 431.81 Electrical Parts&Supplies 70112 Kienow Associates, Inc. 6,068.03 Legal Services 1-2-4 70113 Knowledge Point 18,337.50 Software Upgrade-Performance Impacts Maintenance Program 70114 L&N Uniform Supply Co. 2.948.22 OCSD Baseball Caps with Logo-Safety Awards 70115 Lascomm 546.22 Computer Software/Hardware 70116 Lexis Nexis Matthew Bender 333.56 Books&Publications 70117 Lucci's Gourmet Foods, Inc. 77.12 Meeting Expense 70118 LINJER 5,314.52 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 70119 Managed Health Network 972.00 Employees Assistance Program 70120 Mandic Motors 155.00 Towing Services 70121 Manley's Boiler, Inc. 3,500.00 Training Registration 70122 Madnus Scientific 123.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 70123 MassMutual Michel Financial Group 377.35 Executive Disability Plan Premium 70124 McJunkin Corporation 1.578.08 Plumbing Supplies 70125 McKenna Engineering&Equipment Co., Inc. 143.50 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 70126 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 1,893.72 Tools&Misc.Repairs&Maintenance Supplies 70127 Medlin Controls Co. 4,382.40 Instrument Supplies 70128 Michael Asner Consulting 5,296.55 Professional Services J-40-7 70129 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 2,160.39 Repairs&Maintenance Services 70130 Minarik 110.42 Instrument Supplies 70131 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 90.51 Janitorial Supplies 70132 National Plant Services, Inc. 3,960.00 Vacuum Truck Services 70133 National Technology Transfer, Inc. 13,993.00 On-Site Training-Custom Mechanical Drives Power Transmission 70134 Neal Supply Co. 731.61 Plumbing Supplies 70135 Network Catalyst, Inc. 8,615.69 Computer Software/Hardware 70136 NetVersant of Souther California 17,176.26 Security System Camera&Perimeter Fence at Plt. 1 Effluent Junction Box 70137 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 15,900.00 Training Registration 70138 Nickey Petroleum Co.,Inc. 882.62 Turbine Oil 70139 O C Tanner Recognition Company 1,726.57 Employee Service Awards Program 70140 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,918.11 Office Supplies 70141 Olympic Creations 754.19 7/8"Clolaonn6 Pins with"FOG"Inscription 70142 OneSaurce Distributors, Inc. 3,522.14 Electrical Parts&Supplies 70143 Operation Technology,Inc. 1,196.25 Training Registration 70144 Orange County Hose Company 48.43 Hydraulic Hose Supplies&Parts 70145 Orange County Pump Co. 248.02 Mechanical Seal 70146 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 1,728.72 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 70147 Oxygen Service Company 3,706.92 Specialty Gases 70148 OCB Reprographics 8,430.18 Printing Service-MO 1126100 70149 P.L.Hawn Company, Inc. 512.02 Electrical Parts&Supplies H:Weptlfln%EXCEL.dta12201APSHARE1Clalms Pald Report105-081CIaims Pald Report�31-05.x1a EXHIBIT B e,.ninn.- Pane 6 of 12 e1101,Y1 r q Claims Paid From 03/16/06 to 03/31/05 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 70150 Pacific Mechanical Supply 948.27 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 70151 Parker Supply Company 2,211.84 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 70152 Parkhouse Tire,Inc. 720.46 Tlres 70153 Partners Consulting Services 18,600.00 FIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 70154 Pazzulla Plastics,Inc. 1,808.00 Fabrication&Installation of Laminated Counter Tops at Control Center 70155 PenValve 568.17 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 70156 Port Supply 1,492.84 Electrical Parts&Supplies 70157 Power Electro Supply Co., Inc. 32.76 Electrical Parts&Supplies 70158 Praxis Corporation 9.024.50 On-Site Training-Electrical Safety 70159 Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. 403.65 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 70160 PrinterGuy 6,130.90 Printer Maintenance 70161 Prudential Overall Supply 3.324.50 Uniforms&Related Articles 70162 PCG Industries 2,135.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-High Rate Mixer Pump Shaft 70163 PCS Express, Inc. 447.22 Courier Service 70164 R.W.Beck 592.00 Professional Services FE03-15 70165 R. L.Abbott&Associates 3,000.00 Kem County Biosolkis Consulting Services 70166 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,816.57 Trash Removal 70167 Rainin Instrument,L.L.C. 126.30 Lab Parts&Supplies 70168 Red Valve Company,Inc. 654.07 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 70169 Reliastar 10,097.70 Employee Basic Life&Managers'Insurance Premiums 70170 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 10.9,96.75 Employee Life Ins. Premium,Short-Term Disability&Cancer Ins.Payroll Deductions 70171 Ricoh Business System 1,623.90 Color Copier Lease 70172 R Company,LTD 3,800.00 Software Maintenance Agreement-Image 2000 70173 RTM Lighting&Electronics, Inc. 1,994.45 1,000 Watt Metal Halide Universal Bum Light 70174 S.G.E.,Inc. 40.92 Lab Parts&Supplies 70175 Safe-T-Rack Systems, Inc. 648.77 Lab Parts&Supplies 70176 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 7,902.50 Construction-Air Vent Manholes Dewatering 70177 Saybolt, L.P. 720.00 Lab Analyses 70178 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 18,816.47 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 70179 Scottel Voice&Data, Inc. 2,284.80 Telephone System Maintenance 70180 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 726.72 Small Tools 70181 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,083.06 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 70182 Sigma Aldrich, Inc. 5,580.74 Lab Parts&Supplies 70183 Smith-Emery Company 1,186.40 Soils,Concrete&Other Materials Testing P1-37,J-77&132-60 70184 Snap-On Tools, Inc. 151.55 Tools 70185 So.Cal.Gas Company 6,222.39 Natural Gas 70186 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 254.10 Annual Emissions,Operations&Misc.Fees 70187 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 254.10 Annual Emissions,Operations&Misc.Fees 70188 South Coast Roof, Inc. 340.50 Roof Repairs 70189 Southern California Edison 1,617.65 Power 70190 Southern Counties Lubricants 1,249.36 Gear Oil 70191 Southwest Scientific, Inc. 232.74 Instrument Supplies 70192 Sparkletts 1.523.44 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 70193 Spectra Gases, Inc. 4,220.09 Lab Parts&Supplies 70194 Spex Certiprep, Inc. 128.21 Lab Parts&Supplies 70195 Stanley Steamer International, Inc. 224.00 Carpet&Furniture Cleaning Services H:%deptffnlEXCEL.dta1220WPSHARE1Cialma Peld RepoMS-061Cialm Paid Report-03.31.05.xia EXHIBIT B t+.nwn Pace 7 of 12 MlanMg. Claims Paid From 03116105 to 03/31/05 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 70196 Steven Enterprises, Inc. 1,054.32 Office Supplies 70197 Sunset Ford 24.02 Auto Parts&Service 70198 Sunset Industrial Parts 1,475.32 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 70199 Technical Service Group, Inc. 1,381.60 SCADA System VAX Service Agreement 70200 SBC 732.23 Telephone Services 70201 SBC/MCI 815.61 Telephone Services 70202 SPEC Services, Inc. 15,643.23 Engineering Services J-33-1 70203 SPX Valves&Control 4,610.40 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 70204 T&C Industrial Controls, Inc. 961.67 Electrical Parts&Supplies 70205 Taco Factory 125.26 Meeting Expenses-Btoscilds Management Program 70206 Tenninix International 2,920.00 Pest Control 70207 The Cultured Abalone 434.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 70208 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 6,477.70 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 70209 Thompson Publishing Group 84.50 Publication 70210 Time Motion Tools 301.73 Tools 70211 Tower Equipment Company, Inc. 2.276.31 Valves 70212 Townsend Public Affairs 5,000.00 Legislative&Executive Advocate for Grant Funding 70213 Traffic Control Service, inc. 253.21 Traffic Safety Supplies 70214 Truck&Auto Supply, Inc. 169.56 Automotive Supplies 70215 TEKsystems 5,754.00 Temporary Employment Services 70216 US Filter Corp. 1,160.71 Service Agreement-DI Water Systems at Plants 1 &2 70217 Underground Service Alert of So.Calif. 1,073.80 Membership-Underground Utility Identification/Notification Service 70218 United Direct Marketing 3,248.74 Public Outreach Printing&Distribution Costs&Postage Permit 7-36&11-26 70219 United Pacific Services,Inc. 11,316.99 Landscape Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 and Pump Stations 70220 United Parcel Service 206.69 Parcel Services 70221 Urban Water Institute, Inc. 600.00 Environ.Compliance Services Division Meeting Registration 70222 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 23.244.00 Temporary Employment Service 70223 Vapex,Inc. 472.00 Pump 70224 Varian,Inc. 3,789.81 Instrument Repairs&Maintenance 70225 Veme's Plumbing 2,143.99 Service Contract-Testing&Carl. Bac kfiow Devices at Pits. 1&2&Pump Sla. 70226 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 9,674.40 Vision Service Premium 70227 Vortex Corp. 1,259.90 Door Repair 70228 W11R Scientific Products 4,160.78 Lab Parts&Supplies 70229 Wastewater Treatment Plant Specialist 5,000.00 Professional Services-Polymer Performance Studies in Primary Process 70230 West-Late Supply Company,Inc. 220.14 Electrical Parts&Supplies 70231 Western States Controls 799.27 Electrical Parts&Supplies 70232 Western Switches&Controls, Inc. 475.53 Electrical Parts&Supplies 70233 Westport Aparalus DBA Breaker Supply 483.18 Electrical Parts&Supplies 70234 WEF 581.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 70235 Xerox Corporation 370.73 Fax&Copier Leases 70236 Xyon Business Solutions,Inc. 21,418.00 Temporary Employment Services 70237 Yokogawa Corp.of America 531.43 Instrument Supplies 70238 Margate Construction,Inc. 14,110.79 Construction J-67 70239 Matt Adams 182.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70240 Juan J.Ambriz 54.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70241 Lisa Arosteguy 333.08 MeetinglTraining Expense Reimbursement H.Weprifln%EXCEL.dta12201APSHARE1Ciairtrs Pald Repar505-001Ci ma Paid Report-03-31-05.xis EXHIBIT B emoinn,. Paae 8 of 12 A140M 9 a Claims Paid From 03116/05 to 03/31/05 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 70242 Layne T.Baroldi 692.80 Meeting/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 70243 Jeffrey Brown 318.10 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70244 Kimberly C.Christensen 843.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70245 James E.Colston 214.70 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70246 Ricardo A.Gallegos 279.46 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70247 Charles F.Gober 147.96 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 70248 Janet L.Gray 361.68 Meeiingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 70249 LKevin Haddon 773.21 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70250 James D.Herberg 177.00 Meetingrrraining Expense Reimbursement 70251 Ronald J.Hinshaw 151.50 Meeting/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 70252 Deirdre E. Hunter 118.31 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70253 Paul Loehr 361.68 Meeting/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 70254 Anthony P.Monary 170.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70255 Michael N.Morey 478.55 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70256 Samuel L.Mowbray 348.53 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70257 Andrew H. Nau 132.50 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimbursement 70258 Canh 0.Nguyen 823.50 Meeting/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 70259 James D.Niswonger 757.43 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70260 George L.Robertson 601.88 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70261 Doug Rulison 277.87 Meeting/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 70262 John D.Stephens 1,060.06 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70263 Douglas M.Stewart 674.86 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimbursement 70264 Brian J.Tafolla 270.32 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70265 Mary S.Thompson 319.74 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70266 Jane H.Tran 406.16 Meeting/rralning Expense Reimbursement 70267 Michael Vuong 250.00 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimbursement 70268 Susan M.Walker 422.42 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70269 Joanne Ward 181.92 Meeting/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 70270 David M.Yager 85.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70271 Paula A.Zeller 520.61 Meeting/rraining Expense Reimbursement 70272 Orange County Sanitation District 1,574.70 Petty Cash Relmb. 70273 State Board of Equalization 300.00 Annexation Fee 70274 Dell Computer 59,760.91 (35)Desktop PC's,(12)Printers(1)Battery 70275 NRG Thermal Services,L.L.C. 82.530.00 Professional Services J-79 70276 South Orange County Wastewater Authority 34,618.39 Training Registration 70277 Southern California Edison 144,857.92 Power 70278 Synagro West, Inc. 116,612.91 Digester Cleaning&Maintenance Services at Plants 1 &2 70279 Woodruff,Spradlin&Smart 95,239.39 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 70280 ITT Cannon Electric 104,863.41 Reconciliation User Fee Refund 70281 Airgas Safety, Inc. 1,875.44 Safety Supplies 70282 Marian M.Alter 394.91 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70283 AKM Consulting Engineers 17,4C0.00 Professional Services-Part-Time Dig Alert Technician 70284 Ce112CeII 52.09 Phones&Accessories 70285 Center for Creative Growth 2,500.00 Professional Services-O&M Management Coaching 70286 Compressor Components of Califomia 1,248.00 Mechanical Repairs&Maintenance Service 70287 Consolidated Elect_Distributors, Inc. 170.93 Electrical Parts&Supplies MideptlflnlEXCEL.dt MOXAPSHARE%CIafms Paid ReporA05-MClnlms Pald Report-03-31-0S.xla EXHIBIT B etrognm. Pane 9 of 12 d/1anMS Claims Paid From 03116/05 to 03131/05 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 70288 Consolidated Plastics Company 1,327.13 Storage Containers for Lockers on the Nerissa 70289 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 598.55 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 70290 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 700.00 Encroachment Permit 7-39 70291 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 280.00 Encroachment Permit 2-41 70292 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 490.00 Encroachment Permit 7-39 70293 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 35.00 Encroachment Permit 11-22 70294 Court Trustee 454.49 Wage Garnishment 70295 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 70296 CMAA 280.00 Training Registration(Construction Management Association of America) 70297 Dept.of Fish and Game 198.00 Permit Fee-Scientific Collecting 70298 Electra-Bond, Inc. 2,898.48 Refurbishment of Pump Parts 70299 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 9,622.66 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 70300 FedEx Corporation 347.75 Freight Services 70301 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 1,965.04 Lab Parts&Supplies 70302 Franchise Tax Board 100.00 Wage Garnishment 70303 Grainger, Inc. 936.61 Electrical Parts&Supplies 70304 Line Hsiao 365.75 Meetingri'mining Expense Reimbursement 70305 Hub Auto Supply 392.58 Vehicle Parts&Supplies 70306 City of Huntington Beach 11,377.92 Water Use 70307 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 177.69 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 70308 Internal Revenue Service 300.00 Wage Garnishment 70309 Internal Revenue Service 200.00 Wage Garnishment 70310 Interstate Batteries of Cal Coast 225.04 Batteries for Vehicles&Carts 70311 Irvine Ranch Water District 30.53 Water Use 70312 L&N Uniform Supply Co. 553.48 OCSD Embroiled Storm Jackets with District Logo-Biosolids Program 70313 League Of Ca Cities 2,687.50 Meeting Expense 70314 Manley's Boiler, Inc. 9,537.24 Motor&Boiler Repairs&Training Registration-Boiler Operations&Maint. 70315 Marine Technology Network Association 75.00 Membership 70316 Julie A.Matsumoto 380.09 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 70317 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 232.08 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 70318 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 4,350.00 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Progressive Cavity Pump 70319 Mission Uniform Service 639.93 Uniform Rentals 70320 National Bond&Trust 2,386.81 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 70321 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 63.57 Electrical Parts&Supplies 70322 Orange County Public Affairs Assoc. 45.00 Membership 70323 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 99.73 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 70324 OCEA 654.11 Dues Deduction 70325 Partners Consulting Services 22,680.00 FIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 70326 Pico Rivera Pallet, Inc. 1,762.79 Building&Maintenance Materials-(200)UB/Grade Pallets 70327 Planet Associates 7,918.00 Software Maintenance 70328 Port Supply 229.77 Foul Weather Gear 70329 Rees Scientific 12.941.42 Lab Software/Hardware Upgrade-Rees Scientific System II 70330 Rockwell Engineering&Equipment Co. 4,042.03 Pump Supplies 70331 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 650.00 Engineering Services-Digesters 9&10 Concrete 70332 RPM Electric Motors 7,939.94 Repairs&Maintenance-EM/Amplispeed Drive Unit 70333 City of Seal Beach Finance Dept. 200.22 Water Use H:%depfltin%EXCEL.dta1220WPSHARE1Clalms Pell ReportQS08%Clslms Pald Report-03.31-05.xls EXHIBIT B n.nlnm Pane 10 of 12 d11APJAA Claims Paid From 03116/05 to 03131105 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 70334 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 361.40 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 70335 Southern California Edison 30.40 Power 70336 Southern Counties O€I.Co. 14,060.65 Diesel 70337 Summit Steel 1,923.22 Metal 70338 SBC 1,522.61 Telephone Services 70339 SBC/MCI 305.85 Telephone Services 70340 The Plastic Mart, Inc. 3,400,13 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 70341 Times Community News 50.00 Notices&Ads 70342 U.S.Metro Group,Inc. 24,785.00 Janitorial&Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 70343 The Unisource Corporation 435.69 Office Supplies 70344 United Parcel Service 1,109.83 Parcel Services 70345 United Way 255.00 Employee Contributions 70346 Verizon California 79.43 Telephone Services 70347 Western Solutions, Inc. 5,622.00 Outside Laboratory Services 70348 WEF 139.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 70349 Steve Anderson 143.05 Meetinglrraining Expense Reimbursement 70350 James Ferryman 142.26 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 70351 Amcor-Suncipse,Inc. 23,585.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70352 Arrowhead Products 2,145.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70353 Basic Electronics,Inc 368.55 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70354 Bodycote Lindberg Corp. 1,000.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70355 Boeing-Anaheim 5,723.08 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70356 Boeing Company,The 579.81 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70367 Brea Community Hospital 18,184.69 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70358 Cambro Manufacturing 8,593.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70359 Cannon Equipment West 13,663.58 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70360 Caran Precision Engineering 824.59 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70361 Chapman Hospital 1,137.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70362 Crockett Container Corp. 17,096.02 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70363 Custom Enamelers, Inc. 3,124.53 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70364 CAPIO:Calif Assoc of Public Info Offcls 250.00 Training Registration 70365 Data Aire, Inc. 1,656.73 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70366 Delphi Automotive Systems,L.L.C. 19,220.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70367 Duoommun Aerostructures 408.33 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70368 Electro Metal Finishing Corp. 262.04 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70369 Engravers Ink Company 488.20 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70370 Essex Electric, Inc. 41.91 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70371 Gallade Chemical, Inc. 1.149.51 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70372 General Container Corp. 11,482.36 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70373 H. Koch&Sons 8.139.80 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70374 Harbor Truck Bodies,Inc. 5,258.27 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70375 The Hartwell Corporation 4,625.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70376 Hyatt Die Casting&Engineering Corp. 522.10 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70377 Independent Forge Co. 735.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70378 Irvine Sensors Corp. 14,133.67 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70379 Johnson Controls,Inc. 22,872.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program H:ldept Pn%EXCEL.dta122MAPSHARE%Claims Paid Reporres-081CIalms Paid Report-03-31.05.x1s EXHIBIT B enMlnni Pane 11 of 12 AMAHMS Claims Paid From 03/16106 to 03/31/06 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 70380 Kenlen Specialities, Inc. 1,728.04 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70381 Mead Westvaco Packaging 7,348.27 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70382 Orange County Fire Authority 685.00 Planning&Development Permit Fee 70383 Pacific Utility Products 275.26 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70384 Pacifica Aerospace Corp. 14,158.35 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70385 Plelon Corp.#2 1,170.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70386 Powdercoat Services 822.73 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70387 Precious Metals Plating Co. 13.33 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70388 Precision Painting 4,167.05 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70389 Pure Chem Products Co. 453.39 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70390 Peterson, Rodney&Best Buy 1,226.12 Employee Computer Loan Program 70391 Reid Metal Finishing 5,125.17 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70392 RBC Transport Dynamics 8,731.87 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70393 SPS Technologies 10,687.70 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70394 Taormina Industries,Inc.#4 343.15 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70395 Transline Technology, Inc. 973.65 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70396 U.W.M.C. Hospital Corp.-Anaheim 7,940.89 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70397 Veeco Electro Fab, Inc.#2 227.65 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70398 Venoor, Inc. 1,006.35 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70399 Video Editor, Inc. 2,324.11 Video Services-FOG Program 70400 West American Rubber Company 3,384.37 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70401 Beckman Coulter, Inc. 61,014.81 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70402 Bearing Inspection, Inc. 134.39 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70403 Los Alamlos General Hospital 10,127.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 70404 Magnetic Metals Corporation 549.81 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants $ 8,558,685.89 Payroll Disbursements 37360-37472 Employee Paychecks $ 162,608.26 Biweekly Payroll 03/16/05 37473-37473 Employee Paycheck $ 1,369.90 Interim Paycheck 37474-37564 Employee Paychecks 161,674.35 Biweekly Payroll 03/30/05 37565-37569 Employee Paychecks 2,510.99 Interim Paychecks 109491 -110042 Direct Deposit Statements 1,144,263.29 Biweekly Payroll3/16/05 110M-110590 Direct Deposit Statements 1,142,680.31 Biweekly Payroll 3130/05 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 2,615,107.10 Wire Transfer Paymenta OCSD Payroll Taxes&Contributions $ 1,659,513.92 Biweekly Payrolls 03/16/05&03/30/05 U.S. Bank 226,647.13 March Interest Payment for Series 2000,A&B Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 1,886,161.05 Total Claims Paid 03116105-03131105 $ 13,059,954.04 H:1depNftn%EXCEL.dta%220WPSHARE1Claima Paid Reporn(15-MCIalms Paid Report-03-31-05.xis EXHIBIT B fw7inn, Paae 12 of 12 u1aMrHtS BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 4/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 9(a) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Senior Engineering Associate SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-49 — McCREARY ANNEXATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file petition from John McCreary requesting annexation of 1.22 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the vicinity of Meads Avenue and Orange Park Boulevard. in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 05-06, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-49 — McCreary Annexation). SUMMARY • OCSD received a request from John McCreary to annex one parcel which totals 1.22 acres to OCSD. The property owner will connect to a new 8-inch VCP City of Orange public sewer on Meads Avenue. • The City of Orange will issue a sewer connection permit and collect the OCSD sewer capacity fees for this home. Assessor parcel number for this property is 093-433-10. • This parcel will be annexed to the City of Orange. There is an existing four bedroom home with a septic system on the property, and the owner is requesting to connect to a public sewer. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.8 Tax Exchange for annexing properties. The Board of Directors approved this action and it became effective March 14, 1989. Under this Tax Exchange. OCSD does not receive a percentage of the basic levy, and instead, collects a higher annexation fee. The fee of $7,209.70 includes the following: LAFCO Processing Fee $1,150.00 OCSD Processing Fee 500.00 State Board of Equalization Processing Fee 350.00 CA Environmental Quality Act Filing Fee 43.00 OCSD Annexation Acreage Fee S5,166.70 TOTAL ANNEXATION FEE $7,209.70 PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS N/A BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS Notice of Exemption will be filed. ATTACHMENTS Map and Legal Description RLC:sa H:\ntglobahAgenda Draft Reports\Joint Boards\McCrearyAnnex.doc Revised 8120101 Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 4/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 9(b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin. Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Senior Engineering Associate SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-50 — SULLIVAN ANNEXATION GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Receive and file petitions requesting annexation of 2.829 acres to Orange County Sanitation District in the vicinity of Randall Street and Clark Lane, in an unincorporated area of Orange County: and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 05-07, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-50 — Sullivan Annexation). SUMMARY • Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) received a request from William Burns, Gary Moon, Charles Worsham, Kyle Sullivan, Phillip Sullivan, Scott Warnol, Robert Anderson and Michael Tietz to annex eight parcels totaling 2.829 acres to OCSD. All eight properties will connect to a new eight-inch VCP City of Orange public sewer on Randall Street. • The City of Orange will issue all sewer connection permits and collect the OCSD sewer capacity fees for each property. Assessor parcel numbers for the properties are as follows: 379-571-02, 379-581-12. 379-582-15, 379-582-12, 379-572-17, 379-573-01, 379-572-12, and 379-573-11. • All of the parcels will be annexed to the City of Orange. Seven of the properties have an existing septic system and are requesting to connect to a public sewer. One of the properties is a vacant lot that will be developed and connect to the public sewer in the future. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.8 Tax Exchange for annexing properties. The Board of Directors approved this action and it became effective March 14. 1989. Under this Tax Exchange, OCSD does not receive a percentage of the basic levy, and instead, collects a higher annexation fee. The fee of $14.023.82 includes the following: LAFCO Processing Fee $1 ,150.00 OCSD Processing Fee 500.00 State Board of Equalization Processing Fee 350.00 CA Environmental Quality Act Filing Fee 43.00 OCSD Annexation Acreage Fee $11,980.82 TOTAL ANNEXATION FEE $14,023.82 PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This itern has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS Notice of Exemption will be filed. ATTACHMENTS None RLC:sa K\ntglobalWgenda Draft Reports\Joint Boards\SullivanAnnex.doc Revised 8120101 Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 4/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 9(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Senior Engineering Associate SUBJECT: UTILITY AGREEMENT NO. 12-UT-856 WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADJUST (22) MANHOLE COVERS ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Utility Agreement No. 12-UT-856 with the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to adjust eleven sewer valve frames and covers, and 22 sewer manhole frames and covers on Pacific Coast Highway, from Old Newport Boulevard to Beach Boulevard within Orange County for an amount not to exceed S12,100. SUMMARY • Caltrans is constructing a street rehabilitation and drainage improvement project on Pacific Coast Highway. The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) owns the sewer facilities that will need to be adjusted to grade on Pacific Coast Highway. Pacific Coast Highway is a state highway and owned by Caltrans. • The OCSD sewer is under permit with Caltrans and OCSD is responsible for paying any and all modifications and conditions that are required by Caltrans on this state highway. • OCSD must reimburse Caltrans to adjust the surface elevation of these manhole covers when they do their street improvements. Caltrans has estimated the OCSD portion of the construction work to be $12,100. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The source of funds will come from Revenue Area repair and maintenance reserves. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS N/A BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section 5, Page 3) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS Exempt ATTACHMENTS N/A RLC:sa H:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\Joint Boards\CalTrans12-UT-856.doc .�, F e--o-„ Page 2 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 04/27/05 AGENDA REPORT item Number Item Number 9(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Adam Nazaroff, Associate Engineer III SUBJECT: AGREEMENT WITH THE IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT TO ACCOMMODATE SEWAGE FLOW FROM THE CONSOLIDATED REVENUE AREA TO REVENUE AREA 14 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve an accommodation agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) to allow sewage flow from the City of Newport Beach to enter the IRWD system; and (2) Authorize a $231 ,000 past sewage flow credit to IRWD, in a form approved by General Counsel. SUMMARY • The City of Newport Beach (City) owned and maintained two sewage pump stations that are adjacently south of Jamboree and University Drive (a.k.a. Jamboree and Bison pump stations). • The City determined that these pump stations could be abandoned and that the sewage could gravity flow into an Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) sewer system. • IRWD and the City entered into an agreement and the pump stations were abandoned in June of 1999. • This IRWD sewer eventually flows into the OCSD system and is metered at the Main Street metering structure (just east of Main Street and Jamboree Road). • Per a series of past agreements, OCSD invoices IRWD for the capacity and treatment of sewage flow from Revenue Area 1 that enters the OCSD system at the Main Street metering structure. • Since the sewage flow from the Newport Beach area is outside of Revenue Area 14, it needs to be subtracted from the Main Street meter readings. • The agreement will administratively allow staff to monitor sewage flows and report them to IRWD, so invoicing for these sewage flows will be correct. H-ldeptlagenda180ARDA-11200580-11040511tem 9(d)IRWD Accommodation Agmt doc Revised 06/04/03 Page 1 PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS On June 10, 1991 , the OCSD Board of Directors approved a similar agreement with IRWD that allowed the abandonment of ten sewage pump stations. This allowed the sewage from these pump stations to gravity flow to the IRWD Harvard Avenue Trunk System. These flows are currently being deducted from the Main Street metering structure readings. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Since this agreement is being executed after the pump stations have been abandoned. the agreement will require OCSD to credit IRWD for the cost of retroactive sewage flow from Newport Beach back to July 1, 1999. This amount is S231 ,000. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The attached figures show the areas of Newport Beach that will flow into Revenue Area 14 (RA-14). Flows from these areas will be deducted from the RA-14 flows that are billed to IRWD. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS Not Applicable ATTACHMENTS Exhibits of sewage flow areas AN:sa K\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\Joint Boards\AR-BisonJamboree Agreement with IRWD.doc Hldepttagenda\BOARDA-112005BO-110405XItem 9(d)IRWD Accommodation Agmt doc Revised 06/04103 Page 2 AppraWmAULoertlon forAnnuY Yootterina i WC ~ Abendonod r Pump OU0011 f � and Ferae Yoln y7 k� ` " 4/ a 8 / e. 1 i tALOO YIOMO 46 A °_`° y `�I •t 91 )_.twine, _ram o11 Newpclt� Bpacr_ a� «� ° 0, : ..: q i,4 .-.- Lf e.r 9 V pt \^•- e e° 94THLL Yoow"M Legend Exhibit A =Abandoned Force Main�CtlyBoundsry Agreement Area N -----Local Sewer AgreementTrlbatery Flow Area Bison Pump Station Abandonment • Local Manholes w4mm OCSD Trunk Line Page 1 of 2 Q Revenue Area 14 610 305 0 610 Feet Looel wNw Infonnstlan suppled by the CAy of Newport eeseh I 1 APPMdm=Looatloe • .• • I far Annual Nonllodnp Vic ` �— r 1 Abandoned t 1 I Piney suds" •� •� 6 and Fam Yale I .0 •' Newport Beach ch ��'� � 1 o OKA Ile, 4 Irvine 9 / G \ • 1 \ 1 LA FBJC=D O 1° Legend Exhibit A a Abandoned Force Main ChyBoundwy Agreement Area N —+ Local Sewer AyraomentTdbutWy Flow Area Jamboree Pump Station Abandonment • Local Manholes OCSO Trunk Line Page 2 of 2 ED Revenue Area 14 900 450 0 900 Feet Looal sewer Into i Won supOled by Me Clly of Newpoet aesoh BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 4/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 9(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Angie Anderson, Senior Engineering Associate SUBJECT: NEWPORT TRUNK SEWER AND FORCE MAINS REPLACEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 5-58 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Consideration of the following actions for Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains Replacement Project, Contract No. 5-58: (1) Approve the Alternative 2C alignment as the Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains Replacement Project, as described in the Final EIR for the Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains Replacement Project, Contract No. 5-58, previously certified pursuant to Resolution OCSD 05-05; (2) Authorize staff to file the Notice of Determination for the Project in accordance with the requirements of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the District's CEQA procedures; and (3) Authorize staff to proceed with implementation of the Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains Replacement Project, Contract No. 5-58. SUMMARY • On March 23, 2005, the Orange County Sanitation District (District) Board of Directors (Board) approved Resolution No. OCSD 05-05, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains Replacement Project, Contract No. 5-58; Making Certain Findings Relating to Environmental Effects identified for Alternative 2C in the Final EIR and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The Board's action on March 23, 2005 was limited to approving "certification" of the EIR, adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP") for Alternative 2C, and making certain findings pursuant to the CEQA for Alternative 2C. • District staff is now recommending that Board of Directors take specific action to approve the Alternative 2C alignment as the Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains Replacement Project or "Project," authorize Staff to file the Notice of Determination (NOD). and authorize staff to proceed with implementation of the Project. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS On March 23, 2005, the Board certified the Final EIR for the Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains Replacement Project, Contract No. 5-58, pursuant to Resolution 05-05. On February 3, 2005 and again on March 3, 2005, the Planning, Design, and Construction (PDC) Committee considered the Final EIR as an Information item only. Revised 06/04/03 Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No action is being requested. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Miscellaneous & Support Projects, Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR, Section 8, Page 11) ❑ This item has been budgeted. but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) No expenditure or budget modification is being requested at this time. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Final EIR for the Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains Replacement Project evaluated the environmental effects of multiple alternative alignments, including three alignments generally along Pacific Coast Highway (Alternatives 1A -1 D) and alignments generally located in the area of the District's existing sewer easement (Alternatives 2A-2C). Specifically, Alternative 2C, which was District staff's recommended "project." would be located approximately 630 feet southeast of the intersection of 61st Street and Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) in the City of Newport Beach, with Treatment Plant No. 2 in the City of Huntington Beach. The alignment would traverse the West Newport Oilfield (Armstrong Petroleum), the Santa Ana River (SAR) salt marsh, and the SAR to connect to Treatment Plant No. 2. The force mains would be installed within the previously disturbed, raised utility road with the SAR marsh: similar to the existing sewer alignment. However. the new pipelines will cross beneath the SAR at a slightly different angle into the District's Treatment Plant No. 2. As documented the Final EIR and in Resolution 05-05, Alternative 2C would have a less than significant impact on the environment with implementation of the recommended mitigation measures identified in the EIR. On March 23, 2005, the Board certified the Final EIR, made findings regarding the impacts of Alternative 2C, and adopted a MMRP for Alternative 2C to ensure that the mitigation measure recommended in the EIR for Alternative 2C will be implemented and enforced. The Board, however. did not take specific action to approve Alternative 2C as the "project" for purposes of CEQA, which is the subject of the current recommendation. The Board's approval of Alternative 2C as the "project" and approval of the other actions will allow District staff to proceed with filing the Notice of Determination (NOD) with the County of Orange and the State of California to trigger the 30-day statute of limitations for a challenge under the California Environmental Quality Act. District staff will also move forward with final design and construction of Alternative 2C. ATTACHMENTS N/A AA:sa K\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\Joint BoardSWR Newport Trk Contract 5-58-approval of Alt 2.doc Revised 06104103 Page 2 MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, March 23, 2005 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Brad Hogin, Counsel Steve Anderson, Chair Don Hughes Jim Ferryman, Vice Chair Randy Fuhrman Carolyn Cavecche, Chair, OMTS Committee Roy Moore, Chairman, FAHR Committee Tod Ridgeway, Chairman, PDC Committee STAFF PRESENT: Jim Silva, County Supervisor Blake Anderson, General Manager Carol Beekman, Director of Communications and Directors Absent: Administrative Services Gail Garrett, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman addressed the Steering Committee and requested Directors increase user fees by 100% this year and 50% next year, which would enable the District to decrease their borrowing for capital improvement projects. General Manager Blake Anderson explained that in 2003 the Board approved raising fees by 15% each year. An increase for fiscal year 2005-06 will be considered in April. He said there are three options: (1) proceed to approve a 15% user fee raise, (2) raise fees by 20%, or (3)follow the original Proposition 218 Notification which was mailed to the public in Spring 2003, which would bring user fees up by 31%. All three options will be provided to the FAHR Committee for discussion. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the February 23, 2005 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 March 23, 2005 (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Chair Steve Anderson and Vice Chair Jim Ferryman will be attending the April 4-6 CASA conference in Washington DC. They will meet with congressional representatives to emphasize the Sanitation District's interest in a $30 million WRDA authorization for secondary treatment and EPA funding earmarked for secondary treatment. Chair Anderson, General Manager Anderson and Director Tod Ridgeway reported on their meeting with Congressman Dana Rohrbacher last week. Vice Chair Jim Ferryman and committee members complimented staff and shared their comments on the biosolids workshop on March 16. Additional comments are reported under the General Manager's report. Chair Anderson announced that Director of Engineering David Ludwin and his staff are in Oakland today mediating the Bushard issues. Chair Anderson reported that he has received a verbal commitment from SAWPA to withdraw its lawsuit. We are awaiting formal action by SAWPA to do so. (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson updated the committee on his meeting with Directors Kang and Miller regarding their concerns pertaining to composting facilities in Orange County. He emphasized the Great Park Committee will be focusing for the next couple of years on governance, broad planning issues, public infrastructure and sustainability. District staff will defer any additional action on this in-county alternative but will continue staff-to-staff meetings. Chair Anderson requested the formation of an ad hoc committee to examine biosolids prospects throughout the county. Director Cavecche agreed to chair it. Chair Anderson also appointed Directors Suhkee Kang and Daryl Miller to the committee. General Manager reported on four bills currently under consideration in Sacramento dealing with biosolids, special district governance, and improving the balance of property taxes between counties. A handout entitled the "General Attributes of a Good Funding Source" was distributed, using criteria provided by the Orange County Taxpayers Association, Orange County Business Council and Monarch's School Bond. Mr. Anderson recommended that Sanitation and Water District staff conduct a GWRS workshop in late Spring 2006 at which time additional information will be available. He will email the GWRS newsletter to all Directors. Mr. Anderson provided an update on the county's progress on a coordinated approach to managing urban runoff. Supervisor Silva announced the Board of Supervisors will be addressing urban runoff issues as well as revenues at an April 19 meeting. Both he and Director Ridgeway emphasized the importance of educating elementary school children and incorporating environmental issues into the State of California education code. 1 Minutes of the Steering Committee �-- Page 3 March 23, 2005 Mr. Anderson announced he will meet tomorrow with Vicki Wilson, Tom Mauk and Tim Casey, Laguna Niguel City Manager, to discuss urban runoff issues. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel did not make a report. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-C) A. Approval by the Board for the formation of an Ad Hoc Committee to advise the Steering Committee re General Counsel Legal Services was reviewed. B. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in April were reviewed. C. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to the Board at tonight's meeting were reviewed. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There was no other business discussed. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, April 27, 2005 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, April 27, 2005 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 4 March 23, 2005 (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m. Submitted by: Gail Garrett Steering Committee Secretary WdeptlagendalSteering CommitteeW41SC Minutes Form.5.doc MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, April 6, 2005 — 5:00 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD)was held on April 6, 2005, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: OMTS Directors Present: Staff Present: Carolyn Cavecche, Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager Doug Davert, Vice Chair Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Don Bankhead Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Harry Dotson Bob Ooten, Director of Operations & Maintenance Sukhee Kang Brad Hogin, General Counsel Ken Parker Lilia Kovac, Committee Secretary Mark Waldman Nick Arhontes Jeff Armstrong Layne Baroldi OMTS Directors Absent: Jim Burror Ann Marie Feery James M. Ferryman, Board Vice Chair Jim Matte Steve Anderson, Board Chair Mike Moore Edith Smith Doug Stewart Others: Randy Fuhrman, Pat McGuigan, David Ross, Don Schulz, Cliff Gould, Kevin Bolin, Bob Dononey, Jeff Thurber, Fred Soroushian (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Cavecche had no report. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 2 April 6, 2005 (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, reported that the County Board of Supervisors has a workshop scheduled for April 19th to address urban runoff issues. Various agencies, including the District, will be involved in developing proposals with regards to issues of governance, decision-making, setting priorities for urban runoff projects, and addressing the issue of financing. Cost surveys report that collectively there is approximately $70 million per year being spent county-wide towards maintaining storm drains and overall improving the surface water quality. The Regional Quality Control Board has brought regulatory action against some agencies that are not fulfilling the requirements in place, and regulatory pressure continues to mount. The District is working with Southern California Alliance of POTWs to define requirements to operate and manage the challenge of urban runoff. The District's Urban Runoff Ad Hoc Committee is still in place, and will reconvene at the appropriate time pending the County's plan development. (6) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The minutes of the March 2, 2005 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved and ordered filed. b. OMTS05-12 Receive and file Technical Services Monthly Report, which focuses on regulatory, biosolids and performance measures for the Technical Services Department. C. OMTS05-13 Receive and file Operations & Maintenance Monthly Report, which focuses on compliance, financial data and performance measures for Operations and Maintenance Department. d. OMTS05-14 Receive and file Information Technology Quarterly Report, which focuses on current performance trends and key technology business applications. e. OMTS05-15 Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt the revised State Office of Emergency Services Resolution with updated job titles for the purpose of obtaining Federal and/or State financial assistance. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 6(a)through (e) under Consent Calendar. (7) ACTION ITEMS a. OMTS05-16 Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file the Ocean Monitoring Program Annual Report for 2003/2004. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 April 6, 2005 Jeff Armstrong reported that the District achieved 100% compliance in recreational waters, and 93% in the surf-zone, with the difference due to urban runoff, with no grease particles observed at the beach. Water quality, ocean bottom, and pollutant levels are all well within regulations. Animal community population is healthy. Between $1.5 and $2 million per year is spent by the District on its ocean monitoring program. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file. (b) OMTS05-17 Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Compliance Summary for the 2004 Annual Report for Biosolids. Mike Moore reported on the District's annual biosolids compliance report. The report is filed with the U.S. EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Board as well as the Arizona Dept. of Environmental Quality. The District's program is in compliance with state and federal biosolids regulations. This report will be accessible on the District's website. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file. (c) OMTS05-18 Recommend to the Board of Directors to: 1. Receive and file Biosolids Advisory Committee Final Report dated February 2005; 2. Receive and file Biosolids Management Options White Paper dated March 16, 2005; 3. Authorize the General Manager to negotiate final terms and conditions, in a form approved by General Counsel, for a contract with EnerTech Environmental, Inc. to manage biosolids at their facility in Rialto, California for a 10-year period, and to provide two five-year extensions at a maximum cost of$69.40 per ton of biosolids, for an amount not to exceed $5,500,000 per year, plus the agreed upon contract escalators, to be submitted to the OMTS and Board for final approval; and, 4. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Memorandum of Understanding with South Orange County Wastewater Authority (SOCWA), authorizing the General Manager to continue participation with Phase II work including the on-going preliminary facility design, permitting, and community relations activities for the development of a composting facility at the Prima Deshecha Landfill in South Orange County, as managed by SOCWA, for an amount not to exceed $150,000 and direct staff to report back to the OMTS Committee periodically on work progress. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 April 6, 2005 Staff is requesting authorization for the General Manager to negotiate contract with EnerTech to process 30% of the District's biosolids to convert into energy at a local processing plant in Rialto, California. Staff is also requesting approval to continue working with SOCWA to evaluate the feasibility of a composting plant at Prima Deshecha Landfill in South Orange County, and allocate 10% of the District's biosolids to the project. General Counsel will analyze the proposed negotiation terms to minimize the legal exposure to the District on these recommendations. The EnerTech contract will be brought back to the OMTS committee for final review and approval and recommendation to the Board of Directors. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (d) OMTS05-19 Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Service Consultant Agreement with GHD LLC, to provide a no-cost time extension for Asset Management Services, Job No. SP-68-02, for a two-month period from April 2005 to July 1, 2005. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (8) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS OMTS05-20 WDR Awareness Training Product Nick Arhontes reported that the training program was created to educate the public works staff at member agencies how to prevent sanitary sewer overflows, and to protect waterways from sewage spills into storm drains. This training product encompasses all compliance requirements by Regional Water Quality Control Board and is helpful to communicate and educate the public, and it is being made available to customer agencies by posting it on the District's website. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology reported that the District received official certification from the auditing agency, TruSecure, for the District's Information security program. TruSecure is an internationally recognized leader in the Information Security field. With more than 4,000 clients worldwide, TruSecure is the largest privately held information security firm in the world. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 April 6, 2005 (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance reported that the agency has experienced relief in the flow levels since the rainy season. (11) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services had no report. (12) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (14) FUTURE MEETING DATES The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for May 4, 2005 at 5 p.m. (15) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (16) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:07 p.m. Submitted by: Lilia A. Kovac Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Secretary H:\dept\agenda\OMTS\2005\0505\040605 OMTS Minutes.doc OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 04/06/2005 04/27/2005 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number OMT505-15 12(b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services. Originator: James Matte, Safety and Health Supervisor SUBJECT: Designation of Applicant's Agent Resolution for Obtaining Federal and State Financial Assistance GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt the revised State Office of Emergency Services Resolution with updated job titles for the purpose of obtaining Federal and/or State financial assistance. SUMMARY Following a natural disaster, the governor will proclaim a State of Emergency as a result of the damage that impacts a specific county. The State of Emergency Proclamation entitles public entities to file for federal and/or state financial assistance for damage and emergency response costs. The District has previously designated the titles of individuals authorized to act on behalf of the District to obtain certain federal assistance under P.L. 93-288 and/or state financial assistance under the Natural Disaster Assistance Act. The job titles previously submitted in January 1998 are no longer valid due to Job Classification Study completed in 2002. This resolution will authorize the General Manager, CIP Project Managers and Health and Safety Supervisor to work with the Office of Emergency Services in order to receive state and federal disaster financial assistance. This designation is valid for all future State and Federal Declarations of State Emergencies. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS Approved Resolution January 28, 1997 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Designation of Applicants Agent Resolution (OES Form 130) H:\dept\agenda\OMTS\2005\0405\06.05-15.FEMA Resolution.doc Page 2 Stet@ of Cwftr e OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES P.A. No.: DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE Board of Directors OF THE Orange County Sanitation District (Governing Body) (Name of Applicant) THAT Controller OR (Title of Authorized Agent) Safety&Health Supervisor OR (Title of Authorized Agent) CIP Project Manager (Title of Authorized Agent) is hereby authorized to execute for and in behalf of the Orange County Sanitation District ,a public entity established under the laws of the State of California,this application and to file it in the Office of Emergency Services for the purpose of obtaining certain federal financial assistance under P.L.93-288 as amended by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988,and/or state financial assistance under the California Disaster Assistance Act. THAT the Orange County Sanitation District ,a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, hereby authorizes its agent(s)to provide to the State Office of Emergency Services for all matters pertaining to such state disaster assistance the assurances and agreements required. Passed and approved this day of ,20 (Name and Title) (Name and,ritle) (Name and Title) CERTIFICATION I, ,duly appointed and of (Name) (Title) do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution passed and approved by the of the on the (Governing body) (Name of Applicant) day of ,20 Date: (Official Position) (Signature) DES Form 130(11-02)DAD Form O MTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 4/6/05 4/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number OMT505-16 12(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, D.Env., Director of Technical Services Originator: Michael D. Moore, Environmental Assessment Manager SUBJECT: Compliance Summary for the 2004 Annual Report for Marine Monitoring GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the 2004 Marine Monitoring Annual Report. SUMMARY The Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) Ocean Discharge permit requires that annual compliance reports be filed with the U.S. EPA and the RWQCB covering four areas: biosolids, ocean monitoring, operations and industrial source control. These reports have different due dates; the Marine Monitoring Annual compliance report was completed March 1, 2005 for fiscal year 2003-2004 and is recommended to be received and filed. OCSD Annual Report for Marine Monitoring (Reporting Year 2003-20041: On March 1 , 2005. OCSD submitted its Annual Report for Marine Monitoring activities to the Environmental Protection Agency, California Regional Water Quality Control Board regulators in compliance with regulations set forth in the NPDES ocean discharge permit. OCSD met all permit compliance requirements for the 2003-2004 monitoring year. Key points documented in the Marine Monitoring Annual Report are listed below: • Compliance with recreational bathing standards were met 100% of the time in offshore waters • Surfzone compliance ranged from 93% to 100%, however, due to effluent disinfection. the out-of-compliance events seen at the beach were likely due to land-based sources of bacteria. No beach grease particles were observed • Compliance criteria for dissolved oxygen, pH, and transmissivity was achieved 96.2%, 95.9%. and 86.0% of the time, respectively. All measured values were within historical ranges, which would not cause adverse effects on biological organisms • Fish and invertebrate communities were not degraded and contaminant concentrations in fish tissues were below state and federal advisory levels PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted. but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The report will be distributed to the Directors at the OMTS Meeting in CD format. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS N/A H:\dept\agenda\BOARDA-1\2005BO-1\0405\Item 12(c).Ocean Monitoring Rpt.doc Page 2 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd. Dir. 4/6/0 5 4/27/0/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number OMTS05-17 12(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, D.Env., Director of Technical Services Originator: Michael D. Moore, Environmental Assessment Manager SUBJECT: Compliance Summary for the 2004 Annual Report for Biosolids GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the 2004 Biosolids Annual Report SUMMARY OCSD's Ocean Discharge permit requires that annual compliance reports be filed with the U.S. EPA and the RWQCB covering four areas: biosolids, ocean monitoring, operations and industrial source control. These reports have different due dates; the biosolids annual compliance report was completed February 19, 2005 for calendar year 2004 and is recommended to be received and filed. OCSD Annual Report for Biosolids [Calendar Year 20041: On February 19, 2005, the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) submitted its Annual Report for Biosolids to the Environmental Protection Agency, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and Arizona state regulators in compliance with regulations set forth in the federal biosolids regulations 40 CFR 503. OCSD met all the compliance requirements for the 40 CFR 503. Key points documented in the Annual Report for Biosolids are listed below: • Annual biosolids production was 635 wet tons per day with an average solids content of 22% • Biosolids contractors utilized included Synagro West, Inc., Honey Bucket Farms, and California Soil Products • 100% beneficial reuse was achieved in accordance with the objectives of OCSD's 1998 Strategic Plan Beneficial reuse options included Class A compost, Class A lime-stabilized land application, and Class B land application • Consistent achievement of pathogen reduction requirements for time and temperature in the anaerobic digestion process • Consistent achievement of vector attraction reduction requirements as measured by volatile solids reduction • Consistent compliance with all contaminant limits • Consistent achievement of all applicable federal, state, and local field application and incorporation requirements The Biosolids Annual Report is presently posted on OCSD's website: http://www.ocsd.com/about/reports/annua]_report.asp PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The report will be distributed to the Directors at the OMTS Meeting in CD format. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS N/A H:\dept\agenda\BOARDA-1\2005BO-1\0405\Item 12(d).Biosolids Compliance Summary.doc Page 2 OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 4/6/05 4/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number OMTS05-18 12(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, D.Env., Director of Technical Services Originator: Jim Burror, Engineering Supervisor Layne Baroldi, Legal & Regulatory Affairs Liaison SUBJECT: Biosolids Management GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1. Receive and file Biosolids Advisory Committee Final Report dated February 2005; 2. Receive and file Biosolids Management Options White Paper dated March 16, 2005; 3. Authorize the General Manager to negotiate final terms and conditions, in a form approved by General Counsel, for a contract with EnerTech Environmental, Inc. to manage biosolids at their facility in Rialto, California for a 10-year period, and to provide two five-year extensions at a maximum cost of $69.40 per ton of biosolids for an amount not to exceed $5,500,000 per year, plus the agreed upon contract escalators, to be submitted to the OMTS and Board for final approval; and, 4. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Memorandum of Understanding with South Orange County Wastewater Authority (SOCWA), authorizing the General Manager to continue participation with for Phase II work including the on-going preliminary facility design. permitting. and community relations activities for the development of a composting facility at the Prima Deshecha Landfill in South Orange County. as managed by SOCWA, for an amount not to exceed $150.000 and direct staff to report back to the OMTS Committee periodically on work progress. SUMMARY Current Biosolids Management Program • OCSD currently produces approximately 650 tons of Class B biosolids per day, or approximately 240.000 tons per year. By 2020, OCSD's biosolids production is projected to increase by about 30 percent, or 310,000 tons per year. • OCSD currently manages its biosolids pursuant to three contracts via: 1) land application of its Class A chemically-stabilized biosolids in both Kern County and on its ranch in Kings County. 2) land application Class B biosolids in Arizona, 3) H\dept\agenda\BOARDA-1\2005B0-1\0405\Item 12(e),Biosolids Management doc Page 1 composting to Class A biosolids in Riverside County and in Arizona, and 4) landfilling Class B biosolids at two landfills in Yuma County, Arizona. • Unfortunately, counties throughout California and Arizona have developed, or are in the process of developing, ordinances that severely restrict or ban the land application of Class B biosolids. Many of OCSD's present management options are anticipated to be eliminated due to these developments in two to five years. • Future regulations for managing biosolids will be more restrictive thus requiring the production of a marketable Class A biosolids "product" that will result in increased costs as current options are eliminated. Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan • These regulatory developments prompted OCSD to authorize CH2MHill to study long-range biosolids management options for OCSD in order to develop a sustainable, reliable, and economical program for biosolids management. The scope of the study was to develop a long-range biosolids management plan (LRBMP) for managing OCSD's biosolids for the next 10 years. Specifically, the LRBMP recommended OCSD take the following five actions: • Employ new in-plant technologies to reduce the volume of biosolids, • Move to the production of Class A biosolids products. • Establish and maintain failsafe backup options, • Develop in-county production facilities and markets, and • Move into the following market(s) using vendor contracts: • Energy and fuel production • Heat dried granular products • Heat drying with soil reclamation • Compost • The LRBMP included an analysis of technologies and markets for biosolids derived products and recommended a detailed implementation plan for OCSD's future biosolids management program. • The LRBMP states that the "merchant facility" alternatives must be pursued in the short-term to bridge the gap between the imminent phase-out of existing beneficial use alternatives and the implementation of in-County OCSD-owned facilities. • Specifically. the two recommended LRBMP options for OCSD to pursue in the short- term were to create Class A biosolids products through the amending of existing contracts and to seek new contracts through solicitation by a Request for Proposal (RFP) process. •tdeptlagenda\BOARDA-112005BO-110405\Item 12(e)Biosofids Management doc Page 2 Request for Proposal Process • OCSD recently released five RFPs for short-term biosolids management contracts based on the recommendations from the LRBMP. Each RFP solicited proposals for managing a portion (200 tons/day) of OCSD's biosolids through the following five technologies: • Energy production, • Off-site thermal drying for production of pellets or granules, • On-site thermal drying for production of pellets or granules, • Heat drying with processes soil, and • Manufacture of compost products. • During the RFP process more than 100 RFPs were issued to potential vendors. At the close of the 90-day proposal period, nine proposals were received in response to the RFPs. This included at least one proposal for each of the RFPs issued. • An initial review concluded that five of the nine submitted proposals lacked mandatory minimum elements found in the RFP instructions. The four remaining viable proposals are: • Synagro, Inc. — Onsite dryer/pellitizer at OCSD Plant No. 2 • McCarthy Family Farms, Inc. —Composting in Kern County, CA • EnerTech, Inc. — Energy production (char fuel) in Rialto, CA • TPS, Inc. — Heat drying with retorted contaminated soil in Adelanto, CA RFP Recommendation: EnerTech Environmental, Inc. • The EnerTech Environmental, Inc. (EnerTech) response to OCSD's RFP is to convert OCSD biosolids to a renewable fuel at their Regional Biosolids Processing Facility in Rialto, California. • This proposal received the highest score of the four viable proposals, 691 out of a potential 850 points, or 81% of the available points. • EnerTech has taken significant steps in developing a regional biosolids processing facility. The facility will be sited on land owned by the City of Rialto, adjacent to Rialto's wastewater treatment plant, and will have a capacity to process 625 tons per day of the region's biosolids. • EnerTech's process is a relatively new, patented heat treatment process. The patented process increases the "dewaterability" of biosolids in order to maximize the efficiency of the production of fuel. By decreasing the moisture content of biosolids prior to drying, a smaller dryer is needed, thus reducing capital and energy consumption. H:ldeptlagenda%BOARDA-11200500-110405Mtem 12(e).Biosolids Management.doc Page 3 • Even though this is a new patented process, much of the equipment (e.g., positive displacement pumps, centrifuges, and dryers) used in the EnerTech process are common in the biosolids processing industry. • OCSD's LRBMP consultant CH2MHill has observed EnerTech's process being performed on OCSD's biosolids at EnerTech's Process Development Unit in Conyers, Georgia and has had their questions answered to their satisfaction. • The fuel product will be totally recycled and reused, under agreements with area cement kilns and other fuel users. Residual ash from the fuel combustion becomes part of the cement product, resulting in no residual waste product liability. • EnerTech proposes to finance, design, construct, and operate this 625 ton per day facility, if sufficient biosolids from Southern California wastewater agencies are committed to the project. At the time of this report, several agencies (the cities of Rialto, Riverside, and San Bernardino) have committed approximately 275 tons per day of biosolids to the project. The project will be economically viable with the commitment of 200 tons of biosolids from OCSD. • An Environmental Impact Report has already been certified and adopted by the city of Rialto. The South Coast Air Quality Management District has approved the air permits for the project. • A detailed report on the rating of the EnerTech proposal can be found in the attached March 14, 2005 OCSD Staff Report Concerning the Biosolids Management Program Recent Procurement Strategy for Potential Long-Term Management Options. • The proposal review team determined that the EnerTech's proposal reflected the best value to OCSD. An award of a contract should follow more intense negotiations by General Counsel and the General Manager. The negotiations should finalize the contract terms and conditions; as well as, ensure that a fair price is being attained for OCSD. • Staff recommends that the Board approve a contract with EnerTech Environmental, Inc. providing a 10-year contract with two additional five-year extensions at a cost not to exceed $69.40 per ton of biosolids managed, plus the agreed upon contract escalators, at EnerTech's Rialto, California facility. H ldeptlagenda%BOARDA-112005BO-110405Utem 12(e)Biosolids Management doc Page 4 r Amendment of the California Soil Products Contract • On March 1, 2002, OCSD entered into a contract with California Soil Products to chemically stabilize 100 tons of biosolids per day at a facility that was to be located in the City of Los Angeles. • The agreement has been in effect for three years and California Soil Products has been unable to develop the agreed upon facility. • On February 26, 2003, OCSD and California Soil products amended the contract to allow California Soil Products to mange OCSD's Class B biosolids at mutually agreed upon sites. • OCSD currently utilizes the services of California Soil Products for landfilling and land application of its Class B biosolids in Arizona at a cost of$37.75 per ton. • Considering 1) the haul distance to the landfill is a 522-mile round trip and that the Class B biosolids land application sites are even farther away from OCSD, 2) diesel consumption at 5.5 miles per gallon, 3) increased insurance premiums, and 4) unforeseen landfill tip fees at the time of the first contract amendment, staff recommends that the Board approve Amendment No. 2 to the California Soil Products Contract to adjust the compensation from $37.75 to $39.84 per ton of biosolids managed plus CPI in order to compensate California Soil Products as a reasonable cost for its services. • This pricing is very competitive and will help keep OCSD's biosolids management options diverse and as sustainable as possible under existing contracts. In-County Option: Composting at the Prima Deshecha Landfill • For the past two years, SOCWA and OCSD have been working with the Orange County Integrated Waste Management Department's Biosolids Committee to site an enclosed biosolids and greenwaste composting facility at the Prima Deshecha Landfill in South Orange County. • The proposed "South Orange County Composting Facility" (Project) would take in approximately 100 to 110 tons of Class B biosolids daily from OCSD and SOCWA and combined with like amounts of wood chips and yard trimmings to produce approximately 65 to 75 tons of compost per day. • OCSD and SOCWA jointly propose this composting program as an environmentally responsible alternative to landfilling beneficial organic materials. • In order to facilitate the development of the Project, OCSD and SOCWA entered into a MOU that set forth certain understandings of SOCWA and OCSD in order to formalize a cooperative partnership for the implementation of the Project. H:Ideptlagendal80ARDA-112005B0-1 104 0 51ttem 12(e).Biosolids Management,doc Page 5 a • The MOU memorialized a 50-50 participation commitment of SOCWA and OCSD in the Project, and consent to initiate and fund the tasks for the initial planning, permitting and concept design of the Project. The MOU states that SOCWA and OCSD will be partners in the Project, each with a fifty percent (50%) interest. • The MOU also expresses SOCWA's and OCSD's intent to enter into a more detailed agreement at a later time setting forth ownership interests, financial commitments and other critical terms to carry out the final planning, design build and/or construction and operation of the Project. • Staff from both SOCWA and OCSD will review and approve contracts for services and work in connection with the Project development tasks before such contracts are awarded and/or executed by SOCWA, which shall be executed in both SOCWA's name and "on behalf of OCSD." • SOCWA and OCSD are committed to the efficient, beneficial recycling of their respective biosolids products. The Project will further this common goal and produce a biosolids product for use as a soils amendment in the SOCWA and OCSD service areas and beyond. • Staff recommends that OCSD amend the existing MOU with SOCWA as necessary and continue to participate in the on-going preliminary facility design, permitting, and community relations activities for the development of a composting facility at the Prima Deshecha Landfill in South Orange County as managed by SOCWA. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS 1. March 16, 2005: Board of Directors' Biosolids Workshop 2. November 2004 OMTS/Board: Approve Memorandum of Understanding already approved by South Orange County Wastewater Authority for Phase 1 of the South Orange County Composting Facility for an amount not to exceed $69,637, which is a 50% share of the cost. 3. April 2004 OMTS/Board: Approve Amendment No. 7 to the Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of OCSD's Biosolids with Synagro West, Inc. (Synagro), providing a contract extension from 6/30/2004 to 6/30/2014 with two additional five-year extensions. 4. March 2004 OMTS: Seek recommendation regarding the process to utilize the biosolids management option implementation process. 5. December 2003 OMTS: Receive and file Final Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7 dated November 2003 and prepared by CH2M Hill, Inc. H:4deptVagendalBOARDA-112005BO-1104054llem 12(a),Biosolids Management.dac Page 6 6. November 2003 OMTS/PDC: Informational item only regarding existing policies and potential future reuse costs outlined in the Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan. 7. October 2003 OMTS/PDC: Informational item only regarding the various in-plant treatment optimization options evaluated in the Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan. 8. September 2003 OMTS/PDC: Informational item only regarding the biosolids product markets and product technologies. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES 1. Not contracting with EnerTech, continue to manage OCSD's biosolids pursuant to the existing contracts and run the risk that the existing options may not be sustainable. Depend on land filling and the potential for volatile tipping fees. 2. Enter into a contract with Synagro, Inc. for an onsite dryer/pellitizer at OCSD Plant No. 2 3. Enter into a contract with McCarthy Family Farms, Inc. for composting in Kern County, CA 4. Enter into a contract with TPS, Inc. for heat drying with retorted contaminated soil in Adelanto, CA CEQA FINDINGS The required CEQA analysis will be performed as necessary for in-County options. H.\deptlagenda\BOARDA-1\2005BO-110405\Item 12(e).Biosolids Management.doc Page 7 } ATTACHMENTS 1. March 14, 2005 OCSD Staff Report Concerning the Biosolids Management Program Recent Procurement Strategy for Potential Long-Term Management Options. 2. Biosolids Advisory Committee Final Report dated February 2005; 3. Biosolids Management Options White Paper dated March 16, 2005; HadepllagendalBOARDA-1%2005BO-11040511tem 12(e).Biosohds Management.doc Page 8 MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, April 7, 2005, at 5 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, April 7, 2005, at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Directors Present: STAFF PRESENT: Tod Ridgeway, Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager Norm Eckenrode, Vice Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Alberta Christy Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Larry Crandall John Linder, Construction Manager Jill Hardy Jim Herberg. Engineering Manager Patsy Marshall Tod Haynes, Engineering Supervisor Harry Sidhu Jim Burror, Engineering Supervisor Charles Antos, Alternate Director Larry Gibson, Engineering Supervisor Jennifer Cabral, Sr. Public Information Specialist Directors Absent: Dave McDonald, CIP Project Manager Steve Anderson, Board Chair Anne Marie Feery, Purchasing/Contracts Jim Ferryman, Board Vice Chair Supervisor Mike Moore, ECM Manager OTHERS PRESENT: Layne Baroldi, Legal & Regulatory Affairs Liaison Joe Forbath, General Counsel Penny Kyle, Committee Secretary Randy Fuhrman Darryl Miller, Director (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Randy Fuhrman encouraged Directors to move forward with staffs recommendation to negotiate a contract with EnerTech for management of biosolids. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Tod Ridgeway did not make a report. +c - PDC Committee Minutes Page 2 April 7, 2005 (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported Bob Ghirelli updated the Directors on negotiations with SAWPA to resolve outstanding issues. Directors Steve Anderson, Mike Duvall and Darryl Miller have met with three members of SAWPA's board over the past six months and have reached an agreement to improve the agencies' relationship for the future. The agreement has been approved by SAWPA's board, which will be considered by the District at the board meeting on April 271'. The District has also received a letter from SAWPA dismissing their lawsuit against the District. Blake Anderson reported the Board of Supervisors would be meeting on April 190'to consider a steering committee, and the governance and decision making issues with regard to urban runoff. Funding issues will also be considered. (6) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering, introduced Joe Forbath of Woodruff, Spradlin and Smart, who would be addressing the PDC Committee during closed session. He also acknowledged Director Darryl Miller who was attending as part of a sub-committee established by Chair Anderson to oversee the Bushard Trunk Sewer project. Mr. Ludwin then referred to the monthly staff report on the Bushard Trunk Sewer project, and advised it would be the last report as all work has now been stopped for this project. Bids were opened earlier that week for the new headworks project at Plant 2. The engineer's estimate for the project is $218 million. Five bids were received ranging between $192.3 million and $215 million. The contract will be awarded at the May board meeting. Mr. Ludwin advised that the secondary treatment project at Plant 1 will require the District to pre- select aeration equipment for the project and design around it. The request for bids would be released in mid-April and is estimated at$4 million. An overview of the Capital Improvement Program, to include staffing and costs, will be presented to the PDC Committee in May. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel had no report. (8) CONSENT CALENDAR a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive, file, and approve draft minutes of the March 3, 2005 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting. g. PDC05-25 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No. 3 for the EOC Control Center and Central Lab Office Modifications, Job No. SP2001-08, with Akraa Construction Inc., authorizing an addition of$10,320 and 59 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $125,313.90, and (2)Accept EOC Control Center and Central Lab Office Modifications, Job PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 April 7, 2005 No. P2001-08, as complete, authorizing the Final Closeout Agreement. h. PDC05-26 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Removal of Underground Storage Tanks at Truck Wash, Plant No. 2, Job No. FE05-12, and Underground Storage Tank Remediation at Cen Gen Building, Plant No. 2, Job No. FE05-13, with JEM Industries, Inc., authorizing an additional $16,004, and 22 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $155,804; and (2)Accept Removal of Under- ground Storage Tanks at Truck Wash, Plant No. 2, Job No. FE05-12, and Underground Storage Tank Remediation at Cen Gen Building, Plant No. 2, Job No. FE05-13, as complete, authorizing the Final Closeout Agreement. i. PDC05-27 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer—Watson Avenue , Contract No. 6-13-1, and College Avenue Pump Station Replacement Force Mains, Contract No. 7-23-1, with Mike Prlich and Sons, Inc., authorizing a credit of$58,815, decreasing the total contract amount to$2,530,871; and, (2)Accept Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-Watson Avenue, Contract No. 6-13-1, and College Avenue Pump Station Replacement Force Mains, Contract No. 7-23-1, as complete, and approve the Final Closeout Agreement. j. PDC05-28 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 19 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$116,710, increasing the total contract amount to $71,523,137. k. PDC05-29 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 3 to Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements, Reach "A", Contract No. 7-36; Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39; Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-41; and City of Tustin Project Nos. 6106 and 6151, with ARB, Inc., authorizing an addition of$571,975 and 20 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $19,466,809. I. PDC05-30 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 for Tenant Improvements to Rebuild Shop at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-89 with Dalke and Sons Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$16,011 and 80 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $128,901; and (2)Accept Tenant Improvements to Rebuild Shop at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-89, as complete, and approve the Final Closeout Agreement. Directors requested clarifications on some of the change order items for Items 80), (k), and (1). R ' PDC Committee Minutes Page 4 April 7, 2005 9. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS (a-lb) a. PDC05-31 Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for Secondary Treatment and Plant Improvement Project, Job No. J-40-10. Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager, updated the Committee on the project and advised the EIR would be considered for certification at the April 27, 2005 Board of Directors' meeting. He briefly reviewed comment letters that have been received from six governmental agencies and staff has prepared responses to those comments. The responses are included in the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR). b. PDC05-32 Biosolids Management Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services, advised that the OMTS Committee approved unanimously to recommend to the Board of Directors at the April board meeting to authorize the General Manager to negotiate final terms and conditions for a contract with EnerTech Environmental, Inc. to manage biosolids at their facility in Rialto, California for a 10-year period, and to provide two five-year extensions at a maximum cost of$69.40 per ton of biosolids, for an amount not to exceed $5,500,000 per year, plus the agreed upon contract escalators; and to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Memorandum of Understanding with South Orange County Wastewater Authority (SOCWA), authorizing the General Manager to continue participation with Phase II work including the on-going preliminary facility design, permitting, and community relations activities for the development of a composting facility at the Prima Deshecha Landfill in South Orange County, as managed by SOCWA, for an amount not to exceed $150,000. Layne Baroldi, Jim Burror and Anne Marie Feery provided a brief presentation on the current and the long-range biosolids management program, the regulatory, legislative and litigation issues, and the intensive request-for-proposals process undertaken to arrive at staffs recommendation. Staff also responded to Directors' questions regarding the application of technology utilized by EnerTech. (10) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-c) a. PDC05-33 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1)Approve a budget increase of$1,237,054, increasing the total budget to $6,677,533 and (2)Approve Amendment No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. providing for additional engineering services for Air Quality Improvements, Job No. J-79, for an additional amount of$1,237,054, increasing the total amount not to exceed $3,067,601. f PDC Committee Minutes Page 5 April 7, 2005 b. PDC05-34 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Tran Consulting Engineers for additional design engineering services for Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-21, for an additional amount of$66,087, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,202,784. C. PDC05-35 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Establish a budget for Realignment and Rehabilitation of the Big Canyon Offsite Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-61, in the amount of$2,280,000; (2)Approve a reimbursement agreement with the City of Newport Beach for Realignment and Rehabilitation of the Big Canyon Offsite Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-61, in a form approved by General Counsel, for an estimated amount not to exceed $2,000,000; and (3) Authorize the General Manager to execute quitclaim deeds and purchase new easements with the Big Canyon Country Club, in a form approved by General Counsel, to satisfy right-of-way needs for the new sewer alignment. (11) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in Closed Session at 6:50 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)to confer with General Counsel re Anticipated Litigation and significant exposure to litigation. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Planning, Design and Construction Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSIION: At 7:31 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (12) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (15) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, May 5, 2005 at 5 p.m. PDC Committee Minutes Page 6 April 7, 2005 (16) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:31 p.m. Submitted by: Penny M. le PDC Committee Secr ary H:\dept\agenda\PDC\2005\Minutes\040705 PDC Minutes.doc PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To ed.of Dir. 4/7/2005 4/27/2005 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC05-25 13(b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Mike Lucero. Project Manager SUBJECT: EOC CONTROL CENTER AND CENTRAL LAB OFFICE MODIFICATIONS, JOB NO. SP2001-08 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 3 for the EOC Control Center and Central Lab Office Modifications. Job No. SP2001-08, with Akraa Construction Inc., authorizing an addition of $10.320 and 59 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to S125,313.90, and (2) Accept EOC Control Center and Central Lab Office Modifications, Job No. SP2001-08, as complete, authorizing the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY Background • This project involves demolition and construction to modify the existing second floor space of the Control Center Building, to be used by OCSD for its Emergency Operations Center. The work includes modifications and installation of interior walls, doors, acoustical ceiling, lighting fixtures, HVAC components, fire sprinkler system, modular furniture, and kitchen cabinets. Also included are modifications to the phone service, local area network (LAN), normal and UPS power system, and upgrading two existing modular office areas in the Central Laboratory. • The plans and specifications were prepared by Marmac Field Services, and the contract was awarded to Akraa Construction Inc. on March 4, 2004. • Change Order No. 3 includes one item of added work and a time extension of 59 calendar days to Job No. SP2001-08. There are no reimbursable or non- reimbursable design errors associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are S200 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date April 26, 2004 Original Contract Completion Date June 24, 2004 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 3 Current Contract Completion Date October 21, 2004 Actual Completion Date October 21 , 2004 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages NA Revised MCA/03 Page 1 Change Order No. 1 Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Miscellaneous Modifications 10,320 59 Staff Requested Design Change Total — Change Order No. 3 $10,320 59 This item adds one door and window, additional fire sprinklers, telephone and data outlets, relocates a fire extinguisher cabinet and radio antenna cable and adds an electrical circuit in the kitchen of the Control Center. These additions were requested by District staff and required by the City of Fountain Valley Building Department. Job Completion This project is 100% complete. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS The contract was awarded by the PDC Committee to Akraa Construction Inc. on March 4, 2004. Please refer to the attached Change Order Status Report for information on the previous change orders. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price S 110,000.00 Previously Authorized Changes $ 4.993.90 This Change $ 10.320.00 Change Orders to Date $ 15,313.90 Percentage Increase to Date 13.92% Final Contract Price $ 125,313.90 BUDGETIMPACT This item has been budgeted. (Line item: CiP Y2003-2004 Budget section s, P. 119) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None Revised 06104/03 Page 2 ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project is categorically exempt from CEQA requirements ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Location and Photo Description of Change Order JBF:Ic HAntgfobalWgenda Draft ReportsTDOSP2001-08 C0#1 and COA 040705.doc Revised. 06/04103 Page 3 Page 4 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Akraa Construction C.O. No.: One (1) Date: April 27, 2005 Job: EOC Control Center & Central Lab Office Modifications, Job No. SP2001-08 Consultant: Marmac Field Services, Inc. Board of Directors Authorization Date: April 27, 2005 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John D. Linder, P.E. Date Construction Manager Approved by: David A. Ludwin P.E. Date Director of Engineering Accepted by: AKRAA CONSTRUCTION Contractor Date EDMS: 003785725 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE EOC Control Center&Central Lab Office Modifications JOB NO. SP2001-08 PROPOSED ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED �_ FUND$ :'TH�� = PROPOSED -.ESTINIIATED. . ESTIMATED BUDGET PROJECTIPHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT INCREASE REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE iEXPENDED TCj BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET DATE ;' p,REQUE$Ts AUTHORIZATION TIlf.DATE /DECRWE Phase 1 -Pra ect Development $ $ - $ Phase 2-Preliminary Design $ $ - $ $ - $ Phase 3-Des n $ 21,780 $ 62,780 $ 62,780 $ 59,119 $ 59,119 $ 54,850 93% Phase 4-Construction $ 82,692 $ 145,011 $ 145,011 $ 119,692 $ 15,314 $ 135.006 $ 115,500 86% Phase 5-Commissions $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Phase 6-Close-Out $ - $ - $ - Phase 7-Contingency $ 7,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ - $ - $ - PROJECT TOTAL $ 111,4721 $ 220,791 $ $ 220,791 1 $ 178,811 $ 15,3141 $ 194.1251 $ 170.350 88% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 111,472 $ 220.791 1 $ - $ 220,791 1 $ 178,811 1 $ 15,314 $ 194,125 $ 170,350 88% PSA/Contract Design PSA $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 :_ $ 46,339 - $ 46.3391 $ 44,5001 96% Construction Contract $ 73.000 $ 135.319 $ 135,319 $ 110,000 $ 15,314 $ 125,314 $ 105,500 84% EMDS: OM778084 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT EOC Control Center and Central Lab Office Modifications JOB NO. SP2001-08 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE OR TIME TO DATE DECREASE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 4/26/2004 $110,000 $110,000 0.00% 60 60 CO NO. 1* 7/2/2004 $0 $110,000 0.00% 60 120 CO NO. 2* 1 11/1/2004 1 $4,993.90 $114,993.90 4.54% 0 0 ding $10 320 Co $125 313 90 ° MO. Pen .. pf.,t f 1392/d *These items approved by the G.M. per Delegation of Authority E DMS:003788109 Page 1 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Akraa Construction C.O. No.: One (1) Date: April 27, 2005 Job: EOC Control Center& Central Lab Office Modifications, Job No. SP2001-08 Consultant: Marmac Field Services Inc. Amount of this Change Order (Add) $10,320.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS The Contractor was directed to furnish labor, materials and install miscellaneous modifications to the Control Center and Central Laboratory. This additional work was not included in the contract documents. A summary of the items and associated costs are as follows: Item Quantity Cost a) Furnish and install new door 2-04 with window and hardware 1 $ 600.00 between Control Room No. 221 and library. The new door with window and hardware was shown on the contract drawings as existing. b) Furnish and install new 1-inch fire sprinkler line and 4 each new 20 linear $3,000.00 sprinkler heads in Control Room No. 221. The new sprinkler heads feet were required by the City of Fountain Valley Fire Marshall to provide additional coverage for new enclosed areas of the room, but were not shown on the contact drawings. c) Control Center Room No. 221 and Office No. 223 Furnish and install 6 additional telephone/data fourplex wall 300 linear $2,990.00 outlets and homerun cable back to existing telephone backboard feet and data server rack in the basement of the Control Center. cable The additional telephone/data outlets were not shown on the Contract drawings and were requested by District Operations staff to provide additional telephone/data services in the remodeled office areas. d) Remove and relocate fire extinguisher from Room No. 228 1 $ 480.00 to the common area adjacent to Office No. 224. The fire extinguisher was installed in a box encased inside the a wall . The fire extinguisher was required by the City of Fountain Valley fire Marshall to be moved from the office to a common area. A Page 2 of 4 ; ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Akraa Construction C.O. No.: One (1) Date: April 27, 2005 Job: EOC Control Center & Central Lab Office Modifications, Job No. SP2001-08 Consultant: Marmac Field Services, Inc. Quantity Cost e) Furnish and Install a new 2-foot wide x 7-foot high fixed clear glass 1 $ 600.00 window in an interior wall in Office No. 223. District Operations staff requested the addition of the window to provide more light inside of the office. f) 1. Relocate ceiling fire alarm sensor out of Office No. 228 1 2. Extend existing antenna cable to new radio room No. 221 50 linear feet cable 3. Add telephone outlet and homerun cable to Control Center Basement for copy machine in kitchen No. 206 50 linear feet cable 4. Add electrical circuit and for microwave oven in kitchen No. 206 1 $ 2,650.00 The above items were requested by District staff. The time extension associated with this item involved a combination of delays to the critical path for the completion of the project. The above additional work was not included in the contract and was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 44 (B) 1) of the General Requirements, Division 01. (Reference FCO No. 1) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $10,320.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 59 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $10,320.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 59 Calendar Days c Page 3 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Akraa Construction C.O. No.: One (1) Date: April 27, 2005 Job: EOC Control Center& Central Lab Office Modifications, Job No. SP2001-08 Consultant: Marmac Field Services, Inc. The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this change order. It is therefore mutually agreed that a time extension of 59 calendar days is required for this change order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses, or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: April 26,2004 Original Contract Time: 60 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: June 24, 2004 Time Extension this C.O.: 59 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 119 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 179 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Date: October 21, 2004 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 110,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 4,993.90 This Change (Add) (Best) $ 10,320.00 Amended Contract Price $ 125,313.90 4 Page 4 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Akraa Construction C.O. No.: One (1) Date: April 27, 2005 Job: EOC Control Center& Central Lab Office Modifications, Job No. SP2001-08 Consultant: Marmac Field Services, Inc. Board of Directors Authorization Date: April 27, 2005 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John D. Linder, P.E. Date Construction Manager Approved by: David A. Ludwin P.E. Date Director of Engineering Accepted by: AKRAA CONSTRUCTION Contractor Date EDMS: 003785725 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 04/07/05 04/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC05-26 13(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Mike Lucero, Project Manager SUBJECT: REMOVAL OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS AT TRUCK WASH, PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. FE05-12, AND UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REMEDIATION AT CEN GEN BUILDING, PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. FE05-13 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Removal of Underground Storage Tanks at Truck Wash, Plant No. 2, Job No. FE05-12, and Underground Storage Tank Remediation at Cen Gen Building, Plant No. 2, Job No. FE05-13, with JEM Industries, Inc., authorizing an additional S16,004, and 22 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to S155,804; and (2) Accept Removal of Underground Storage Tanks at Truck Wash, Plant No. 2, Job No. FE05-12. and Underground Storage Tank Remediation at Cen Gen Building, Plant No. 2, Job No. FE05-13, as complete, authorizing the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY • This contract is for removal of one 15,000 gallon diesel underground storage tank (UST) and one 12,000 gallon unleaded gasoline UST, both located at the Truck Wash at Plant No. 2; and replacement of all underground piping and accessories for a 10,000 gallon lube oil UST and a 3,000 gallon waste oil UST, both located at the Cen Gen Building at Plant No. 2. The new underground piping and accessories are to comply with the latest codes. • In-house staff prepared the plans and specifications for Job Nos. FE05-12 and FE05-13 and the contract was awarded to JEM Industries, Inc., on September 2, 2004. • Change Order No. 1 includes two items of added work to Job Nos. FE05-12 and FE05-13. There are no reimbursable or non-reimbursable design errors associated with this change order. There is a 22 day time extension associated with this change order. The contract includes liquidated damages at $200 per day and no bonus provisions. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date November 4, 2004 Original Contract Completion Date February 2, 2005 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date February 24, 2005 Actual Completion Date February 24, 2005 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Revised. 06/04/03 Page 1 Y Change Order 1 Content Item No. Description Amount Days Type 1 Electrical Modifications $11,950 0 Staff Requested Design Change 2 Tank Cleaning $ 4,054 22 Staff Requested Design Change TOTAL $16,004 22 Item 1 includes electrical/instrumentation changes to the original plans and specifications for improving tank gauging and component materials that were requested by staff. Item 2 provides for the cleaning of existing lubricating oil storage tank and piping that was modified during construction. Staff requested this extra work to avoid the possibility of contaminates causing damage to the system. Job Completion The project is now 100% complete. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS The contract was awarded by the PDC Committee on September 2, 2004. Please refer to the attached Change Order Status Report for information on this requested Change Order PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $139.800 Previously Authorized Changes $ 0 This Change (add) $ 16.004 Change Orders to Date 1 Percentage Increase to Date 11.45% Amended Contract Price $155,804 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8 Facilities Engineering Plant 2) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None Page 2 i ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS Exempt ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Location and Photo Description of Change Order JH:dm H:lntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC1FE05-12&FE05-13 AR CO#1 and Closeout 040705.doc Revised: 06l04f03 Page 3 OF i BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Removal of Underground Storage Tanks at Truck Wash, Plant 2 JOB NO. FEOS-12 rY_ ildi} 6dil�tt;,{s<fY)ti fYll.�ti(4 i i # PROPOSED �.._ t cf ;i ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPC>iSED FUNDS. Tlil> I w ``I•ROF�OS D �w 711�ITE !i'�1 E>�3T[,MI�TED`. BUDGET a PROJECTlPHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUT FIIZATION TOTAL, lIJ `�EI�Dd TO BUDGET BUbGET INCREASE BUDGET: DATE QI�EST A1J}fHORIZATION T b � ATE('i6) !DECREASE i. Phase 1 -Project Development $ - $ $ $ - $ $ - Phase 2-Preliminary Design $ - $ - $ $ - $ - Phase 3-Design $ 14,40 $ 14,400 $ 14,400 $ 14,400 $ 14,400 $ 7,500 52% Phase 4-Construction $ 147,200 $ 147,200 $ 147,200 - $ 72.550 $ 72,550 $ 65,000 80% Phase 5-Commissions $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0% Phase 6-Close-Out $ 720 $ 720 $ 720 $ 720 $ 720 $ - 0% Phase 7-Contingency $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ $ - $ - 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 183,3201 $ 183.320 $ $ 183,320 $ 87,670 $ - $ 87.670 $ 72,500 83% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ 183,320 $ 183.320 $ - $ 183.320 1 $ 87,670 $ - $ 87,670 $ 72,500 83% PSAIContract Design PSA $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0% Construction Contract $ 140,Q00 $ 140,000 $ 140,000 $ 65,350 $ 65,350 $ 50,600 770 EDMS OD3787387 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT REMOVAL OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS AT TRUCK WASH, PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. FE05-12 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM TIME TO DATE DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 9/2/2004 $65,350 $65,350 NIA 90 90 CO NO. 1 N/A CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REMEDIATION AT CEN GEN BUILDING, PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. FE05-13 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE DAYS DAYS CONTRACT 9/2/2004 $74,450 $74,450 N/A 90 90 CO N0.,1: PENDING 3 .. ._ slaoo s• _ ::_ =,,$ 0;45d. ,; ? { ,s,2i> 0�/b .. ;_., ?E_ t, 2 � ...i ,}i . `. ..!_.. '- EDMS:003787388 • Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: JEM Industries, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Removal of Underground Storage Tanks at Truck Wash, Plant No. 2, Job No. FE05-12 Underground Storage Tank Remediation at Cen Gen Building, Plant No. 2, Job No. FE05-13 Consultant: In-House Design Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $16,004.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM — 1 GENERAL MODIFCATIONS This item is for extra labor and materials required to provide general modifications to the contract work. The Contractor was directed by staff to relocate, install, re-program, and test an existing tank monitoring system to the Cen Gen Underground Storage Tanks and provide two new level sensing probes sized for the lubricating oil storage tank and the waste oil tank. This revision required additional items to make a complete system. These items include the installation of one remote overfill alarm, alarm shutoff switch, two float kits, one output relay module, one input liquid module, five piping sump sensors, one interstitial sensor, and one steel interstitial sensor. The costs associated with this change order were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Division 01, Section 44 (B) (1) of the General Requirements. Reference FCO No. 1 and JEM Industries letter dated January 24, 2005. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $11,950 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM —2 TANK CLEANING This item is for extra labor, equipment, and materials required for cleaning the lubricating oil storage tank and piping modified under this project. During the contract work, foreign materials could have entered the tank interior that potentially could damage the Cen Gen Engine Systems. The Contractor shall retain the services of a company that specializes in the cleaning of underground storage tanks. The work includes heating the oil currently in the tank, circulating through a strainer with a 100 micron sock, and sprays the tank interior with a high velocity nozzle. The tank will be deemed clean when two consecutive socks are clean. This additional work was given to the Contractor after the contract specified work was completed. This resulted in a justifiable time extension to the contract. The costs associated with this change order were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Division 01, Section 44 (B) (1) of the General Requirements. Reference FCO No. 1 and JEM Industries letter dated February 14, 2005. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,054 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 22 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $16,004 v Page 2 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: JEM Industries, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Removal of Underground Storage Tanks at Truck Wash, Plant No. 2, Job No. FE05-12 Underground Storage Tank Remediation at Cen Gen Building, Plant No. 2, Job No. FE05-13 Consultant: In-House Design TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 22 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this change order. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 22 day extension of time is required for this change order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses, or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: November 4, 2004 Original Contract Time: 90 calendar days Original Completion Date: February 1, 2005 Time Extension this C.O.: 22 calendar days Total Contract Time Extension: 22 calendar days Revised Contract Time: 112 calendar days Revised Final Completion Due Date: February 23, 2005 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A Actual Final Completion Date: N/A Original Contract Price $139,800 Prev. Authorized Changes 0 This Change (Add) (Deduct) 1$ 6,004 Amended Contract Price $155,804 Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: JEM Industries, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Removal of Underground Storage Tanks at Truck Wash, Plant No. 2, Job No. FE05-12 Underground Storage Tank Remediation at Cen Gen Building, Plant No. 2, Job No. FE05-13 Consultant: In-House Design Board Authorization Date: April 27, 2005 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John D. Linder, P.E. Date Construction Manager Approved by: David A. Ludwin, P.E. Date Director of Engineering Accepted by: JEM INDUSTRIES, INC. Contractor Date EDMS 003787369 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To 4/ of Dir. 04/07/05 04/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC05 27 13(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Milind Joshi, Project Manager SUBJECT: ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE TRUNK SEWER — WATSON AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 6-13-1 , AND COLLEGE AVENUE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT FORCE MAINS, CONTRACT NO. 7-23-1 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer— Watson Avenue , Contract No. 6-13-1, and College Avenue Pump Station Replacement Force Mains, Contract No. 7-23-1, with Mike Prlich and Sons, Inc., authorizing a credit of $58,815, decreasing the total contract amount to $2,530,871; and (2) Accept Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer - Watson Avenue, Contract No. 6-13-1, and College Avenue Pump Station Replacement Force Mains, Contract No. 7-23-1, as complete, and approve the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY • Contract No. 6-13-1 and Contract No. 7-23-1, Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer — Watson and College Avenue Pump Station Replacement Force Mains were contracted as a single construction contract. Contract No. 6-13-1 abandons two sewers that are no longer needed and are not maintainable due to deterioration, and Contract No. 7-23-1 replaces the existing College Avenue Pump Station force mains that were made out of an unreliable material, "Techite", with new force mains. • Both projects are located within the City of Costa Mesa, in the area south of the 405 Freeway, north of Baker Street, and immediately east of Harbor Boulevard. • Boyle Engineering Corporation prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Mike Prlich and Sons, Inc. on September 18, 2003. • Change Order No. 3 is the Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities. There are no reimbursable or non-reimbursable design errors associated with this change order. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date January 5, 2004 Original Contract Completion Date August 3, 2004 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 2 Current Contract Completion Date October 12, 2004 Actual Completion Date October 12, 2004 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Page 1 Change Order No. 3 Content r Item No. Description Amount Days Type 1 Adjustment of Engineer's $( 59,515) 0 Other Quantities Job Completion The contract is complete. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS The contract was awarded by the Board of Directors on September 18, 2003. Please refer to the attached Change Order Status Report. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 2,375,302 Previously Authorized Changes $ 214,384 This Change Order (Deduction) $ ( 59,515) Change Orders to Date $ 154,869 Percent Increase to Date 6.5 % Amended Contract Price $ 2,530,171 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item' FY 04/05, Section 8, Capital Improvement Program. Collections Facilities. Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer-California 6-13-1 & College Avenue Pump Station Force Main Replacement 7-23-1) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This itern has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR certified on October 27. 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29. 1999. Page 2 l ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order MJ:lc H:1ntg1oba1\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC16-13-1 and 7-23-1 AR-040705.doc Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE COLLEGE AVENUE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT FORCE MAINS CONTRACT NO. 7-23-1 PROPOSED t 4_ { ijTHl8 PROP08E ES IMATED Ili ESTIIYldTED ORIGINAL CURRENT BUDGET PRO(�OSED FUNDS h S 9'.p' EXPENDITURE h FENDED TO PROJECTlPHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT 'DECREASE REVISED AUTHORIZED Td'�►UTIORh'A,ION TONAL p EXPEN BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET DATE INCREASE REQUEBT AUTHORIZATION TO DATE. D�►TE(X) Phase 1 -Pro ct Development $ 2,000 $ 1,238 $ 1,238 $ 1,238 $ 1,238 $ 1,238 lea% Phase 2-Preliminary Design $ 5,000 $ 2,855 $ 2,855 $ 2,594 $ 2,594 $ 2,855 110% Phase 3-Des n $ 218,000 $ 120,674 $ 120,674 $ 110,880 $ 110,880 $ 122,306 110% Phase 4-Construdian $ 1,201.000 $ 1,477,523 $ 1,477,523 $ 1,477,523 $ - $ 1.477.523 $ 1,293,823 88% Phase 5-Commissioning $ 100,000 $ 24,939 $ 24,939 $ 34,994 $ 34,994 $ 21,288 61% Phase 6-Close-Out $ 41,000 $ 4,367 $ - $ 4,367 $ 4,367 $ 4,367 $ 1,893 43% Phase 7-Contingency $ 310,000 $ 102,000 $ - $ 102,000 $ - PROJECTTOTAL $ 1.877,000 $ 1,733,596 $ $ 1,733,596 $ 1.631,5961 $ $ 1,631.596 $ 1,443,403 88% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 1.877,000 $ 1.733,596 1 $ - $ 1,733,596 $ 1,631,596 $ - $ 1,631,598 $ 1,443,403 88% PSAIContract Design PSA $ 30,900 $ 70,256 $ - $ 70,256 $ 70,256 $ - $ 70,266 $ 70,256 100% Construction Contract $ 1,035,262 $ 1.212,640 $ - $ 1.212.640 $ 1,182,965 $ 28,640 $ 1,154,325 $ 1,029,138 89% EDUS:003787323 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE TRUNK SEWER, WATSON CONTRACT NO. 6-13-1 PROPOSED F PROPOSED ESTIMATED E$TIIYIATED ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED THIS ,: FUNDS BUDGET PROJECTIPH/ISE AUTHORIZED PROJECT-, REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUT IORIZATiC?N TONAL 1 Eiko' DITURE EXP �IDEb TO s /DE CREASE BUDGET BUDGET CREASE BUDGET DATE TE DATE(% � REQUEST AUTHORIZATIO TO bA A Phase 1 -Project Development $ $ 234 $ 234 $ 234 $ 234 $ 234 100% Phase 2-Preliminary Design $ $ 75 $ 75 $ 75 $ 75 $ 75 100% Phase 3-Des' n $ 16,000 $ 56,152 $ 56,152 $ 56,152 $ 56,152 $ 56,152 100% Phase 4-Construction $ 850,000 $ 1,671.566 $ 1,671,566 $ 1,621,555 $ - $ 1,621 555 $ 1.594,036 98% Phase 5-Commissioning $ 74,000 $ 33,037 $ 33,037 $ 33,037 $ - $ 33,037 $ 27,024 82% Phase 6-Close-Out $ 90,000 $ 7,170 $ 7,170 $ 7,170 $ 7,170 $ - 0% Phase 7-Contingency $ 170,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - PROJECTTOTAL $ 1.200,000 $ 1,768,234 $ $ 1,768,234 :: $ 1,718.223 $ - $ 1,718,2231 $ 11677,521 1 98% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 1.200,000 $ 1.768,234 1 $ - $ 1,768.234 $ 1,718,223 $ - $ 1,718,223 $ 1,677,521 98% PSAIContmct Design PSA $ - $ _ $ _ $ - $ - $ Construction Contract $ 732,785 $ 1.436,485 $ $ 1,436,486 $ 1,406,721 $ (30,875) $ 1,375,846 $ 1,341.501 98% EOMS: 003787322 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE TRUNK SEWERS-WATSON COLLEGE AVENUE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT FORCE MAINS CONTRACT NO. 6-13-1 & 7-23-1 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM TIME TO DATE DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT Sept 24. 2003 $2,375,302 $2.375,302 210 CO NO 1 Dec. 22, 2004 $0 $2,375,302 0 00% 0 210 CO NO 2 Feb. 23, 2004 $214,384 $2,589,686 9.03% 71 281 CO NO. 3 Pending $2,530,171 6.54% 0 281 EDMS:003787548 Page 1 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Prlich and Sons, Inc. C.O. No.: 3 Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer Watson Avenue Contract 6-13-1, College Avenue Pump Station Replacement Force Mains, Contract 7-23-1 Consultant: Boyle Engineering, Inc. Amount of this Change Order (Deduct) 58 815 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES- Add: Item Unit Description From To Diff U.P. Total 6-13-1 6 LF 8" VCP Pipe 4,132 4,187 55 $ 195.00 $10,725.00 7-23-1 5 LF 33" VCP 1,156 1,173 17 382.00 6,494.00 Subtotal 17,219.00 Deductions: Item Unit Description From To Diff U.P. Total 6-13-1 3 CY Crushed Rock 0 -12 in 200 0 (200) $ 45.00 $ (9,000.00) 4 CY Crushed Rock 12-24 in 200 0 (200) 45.00 (9,000.00) 5 EA House laterals 50 42 (8) 1,600.00 (12,800.00) 8 VF 48" Drop Manholes 114 108 (6) 350.00 (2,100.00) 9 VF 48" Manholes 108 101 (7) 300.00 (2,100.00) 17 LF Rehab 30" Sewer 480 458 (22) 300.00 (6,600.00) 7-23-1 3 CY Crushed Rock 0 -12 in 200 0 (200) 45.00 (9,000.00) 4 CY Crushed Rock 12-24 in 200 0 (200) 45.00 (9.000.00) 6 VF Dual 18" Force Main 1,188 1,186 (2) 332.00 (664.00) 7 VF 72" Manholes 91 61 (30) 549.00 (16,470.00) Page 2 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Prlich and Sons, Inc. C.O. No.: 3 Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer Watson Avenue Contract 6-13-1, College Avenue Pump Station Replacement Force Mains, Contract 7-23-1 Consultant: Boyle Engineering, Inc. Subtotal (76,734.00) TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $(59,515.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: January 5, 2004 Original Contract Time: 210 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: August 3, 2004 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Total Contract Time Extension: 71 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 282 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 12, 2004 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 0 Actual Final Completion Date: October 12, 2004 Original Contract Price $ 2,375,302.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 214,384.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (59,515.00) Amended Contract Price $ 2,530,171.00 Page 3 of 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Prlich and Sons, Inc. C.O. No.: 3 Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer Watson Avenue Contract 6-13-1, College Avenue Pump Station Replacement Force Mains, Contract 7-23-1 Consultant: Boyle Engineering, Inc. Page 4 of 3 - ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Mike Prlich and Sons, Inc. C.O. No.: 3 Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewer Watson Avenue Contract 6-13-1, College Avenue Pump Station Replacement Force Mains, Contract 7-23-1 Consultant: Boyle Engineering, Inc. Board Authorization Date: April 27, 2005 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John Linder, P.E. Date Construction Manager Approved by: David Ludwin P.E. Date Director of Engineering Accepted by: Mike Prlich and Sons, Inc. Contractor Date EDMS: 003787612 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 04/07/05 04/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC05-28 13(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Dean Fisher, CIP Project Manager SUBJECT: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 16-31 AND RELATED FACILITIES, JOB NO. P1-37 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 19 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of $116,710, increasing the total contract amount to $71,523,137. SUMMARY Background • Job Number P1-37, Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, includes the construction of 16 new primary clarifiers with all support equipment, improvements to existing Primary Clarifiers 6-15, and improvements to Primary Clarifiers 1-5. • Brown and Caldwell prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Margate Construction on October 24, 2001. • This change order includes 17 items of additional work. There are four non- reimbursable design errors and no reimbursable design errors associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this project are $3,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date January 7, 2002 Original Contract Completion Date November 7, 2005 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 19 Current Contract Completion Date August 29, 2006 Actual Completion Date N/A Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 1 v 4 v Change Order Content Item Description Amount Days Type No. Sealant Addition at Effluent Staff Recommended 1 Launders 13,170 0 Design Change Staff Recommended 2 West Perimeter Road Manhole 3,564 0 Design Change Added Restricted Zones on Staff Recommended 3 Clarifier Deck 1 .845 0 Design Change Basin Drain Equalization Staff Recommended 4 Connections 4,147 0 Design Change Added Structural Support for Fans Non-Reimbursable 5 / Ducts / Bypass Line 18,752 0 Design Error Non-Reimbursable 6 Added Curb, Gutter, and Posts 3,536 0 Design Error Staff Recommended 7 Existing Roadway Modifications 4,320 0 Design Change Additional Pump Rental for Effluent Staff Recommended 8 Structure Tie-ins 2,886 0 Design Change Transfer of Plant Water Between Staff Recommended 9 New Basins 1,890 0 Design Change Added Structural Support at Cable Non-Reimbursable 10 Tray Bridge 10,582 0 Design Error Sampler Electrical Power Staff Recommended 11 Connection PEDB 290 0 Design Change Staff Recommended 12 12-Inch Reclaimed Water Pipeline 9,716 0 Design Change Staff Recommended 13 Valve Limit Switch Modifications 12,933 0 Design Change Staff Recommended 14 Motor Control Center Modifications 3,072 0 Design Change Non-Reimbursable 15 Pressure Switch Addition 1,739 0 Design Error Staff Recommended 16 Concrete Curbs Extension 15,865 0 Design Change Scum Tipping Trough Staff Recommended 17 Modifications 8,403 0 Design Change Total Change Order $116,710 0 Item 1 provides additional sealant to prevent water flow between launders and the adjoining walls. The change was required by staff in order to insure there would be no leakage between the walls and the launders. Item 2 brings the West Perimeter Road existing manhole up to existing grade level. The change was required by staff to eliminate a pre-existing dip in the road surface. 2 i l II 1 Item 3 adds four painted restricted zones to the existing top deck of Primary Clarifiers 6-15. The change was required in order to restrict heavy equipment loads from damaging the existing structure. Item 4 adds two drain connections to the Primary Clarifiers 16-31 main gallery. The change was required by staff in order to equalize flows in the basins to optimize treatment and lower chemical costs. Item 5 adds structural support for three fans, two foul air ducts, and temporary bypass piping that penetrated the existing P1-33 top deck. The design consultant required the additional reinforcement in order to maintain the structural integrity of the existing top deck. Item 6 adds curb, gutter, and guard posts to the Fuentes and West Perimeter Roads near the Primary Clarifiers 16-31 Effluent Distribution Structures. Staff required the change to provide delineation between the structures and roadway in order to provide for safe travel along the roadway. Item 7 removes two existing non-functional vehicle access control devices (a spike strip and a security island) on Fuentes Road near the North Perimeter Road. Staff required the change to improve vehicular access at the chemical truck unloading area. Item 8 adds additional high volume pumping equipment to reduce the shut-down time of the primary treatment facilities as required by Operation's staff. Pumps were used during tie-in of new primary distribution structures to the existing 108-inch pipelines. Item 9 transfers plant water from the westside primary clarifiers into the eastside primary clarifiers to allow for emergency storm water storage. Staff required the extra pumping work in order to prepare for an expected storm event. Item 10 provides for the field erection of the permanent cable tray bridge supports. The design consultant required the additional structural members in order to provide support for conduit and cable tray. Item 11 modifies the electrical power connection provided for the effluent samplers located at the effluent distribution boxes. The change was required by staff in order to make this installation consistent with other sampler installations at the District. Item 12 adds a connection to the existing reclaimed water system. Staff required the change to provide another source of reclaimed water for testing purposes and future operations and maintenance use. Item 13 modifies valve limit switches necessary to comply with recent changes to the District's software standards. Item 14 adds Motor Control Center "ready" lights necessary to comply with recent changes to the District's standards. 3 e Item 15 adds a pressure switch to the Chemical Feed Facility Booster Pump. The switch was omitted from the contract documents and was required to provide water pressure pump control. Item 16 extends the curbs located around the aluminum cover on the deck of the Primary Clarifiers 16-31. The change was required by staff in order to prevent District cart access on top of the aluminum covers. Item 17 relocates the rest position proximity switches for the 52 tipping troughs. The change was required by staff in order to provide a "Fail to Tip" alarm to District's Operation's staff. Job Completion The project is 85% complete. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS The contract was awarded by the Board of Directors on October 24, 2001. Please refer to the attached Change Order Status Report for more information on previous change orders. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 70,366,000 Previously Authorized Changes $ 1,040,427 This Change $ 116,710 Change Orders to Date $ 1,157,137 Percentage Increase to Date 1.64 % Amended Contract Price $ 71,523,137 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, CIR P1-37, Page 58) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are'proposed. 4 CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Strategic Plan EIR that was certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Location and Photo Description of Change Order DF:ms H:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\P1-37 CO-1 9-AR 040705.doc 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Primary Clarifiers No. 16-31 and Related Facilities Job No. P1-37 a.'.. .` -_ i. St� 1{,,�r �' t;—:tJi�{ iY•i.:3 ORIGINAL CURRENTPROPOSED PROPOSED. FUNDS THIS sPROPOSED ES TED ESTI TIARA MATED; pROJECTlPHASE:, AU7HORI2ED` PROJECT GET REVISED ` AUTHORlZEO AUTtEORIZATION TOTAL EI�PENbITURE TO EXPENDEAI'? BUDGET _ BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET: TO DATE.� REQUEST I�UTHORMZA'i101� Phase 1 -Pmect Development $ 173,000 $ 173,000 $ 173,000 $ 173.000 $ 173,000 100% Phase 2-Preliminary Desi n $ 316.000 $ 316.000 $ 316,000 $ 316.000 $ 315,552 100% Phase 3-Design $ 4,556 000 . , $ 4,556,000 $ 4.556,000 $ 4,556,000 $ 4,566,000 100% Phase 4-Construction $ 80,692,984 ;;$ 11t3;710 $ 80,809 694 $ 80,692,984 $.,,t�,, , r'� 1%7,�0 $ 80,809,694 $ 67,665,000 84% Phase s-Commissioning $ 283,000 $ 283,000 $ 283,000 $ 283,000 $ 32,000 11% Phase 6-Closeout $ 60,000 $ 60,000 "�` $ 60,000 '��' n �` $ 60,000 $ Phase 7-Contingency - $ 2,480 018 $ 118 710 $ 2,363,306 ` PROJECTTOTAL $ $ 88,561,000 $ - $ 88,561,000 $ 86,080,084 $ 116,710 $ 86,197,694 $ 72,951.552 85% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET $ - $ 88,561,000 $ $ 88,561,ow $ 86,080,984 'Ital,.,+, ,E9i6;71J$ �97,694 $ 72,951,552 85% PSAIContract Design PSA $ 6,198,861 ,. $ 6,198,861 $ 6,198,861 Y . {.+' "!tax"t;'`' $ 8,198,861 $ 5,450A00 88% Construction Contract $ 71,406,427 , ,_ i 16 7.1t! $ 71.523,137 .' $ 71.406,427 �' ` .116, �0- $ 71,523,137 $ 61,200,000 86% EDMS:003787615 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 16-31 AND RELATED FACILITIES JOB NO. P1-37 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE(DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 6/23/1999 $ 70,366,000.00 $ 70,366,000.00 0.00 1400 1400 CO NO. 1 12/19/2001 $ 0.00 $ 70,366,000.00 0.00 0 1400 'CO NO. 2 8/1/2002 $ 75,214.00 $ 70,441,214.00 0.11 49 1449 "CO NO. 3 10/21/2002 $ 48,736.00 $ 70,489,950.00 0.18 0 1449 CO NO. 4 12/18/2002 $ 356,059.00 $ 70,846,009.00 0.68 82 1531 CO NO. 5 2/26/2003 $ 33,527.00 $ 70,879,536.00 0.73 0 1531 CO NO. 6 4/23/2003 $ 54,992.00 $ 70,934,528.00 0.81 21 1552 CO NO. 7 6/25/2003 $ 14,750.00 $ 70,949,278.00 0.83 0 1552 CO NO. 8 8/27/2003 $ 5,363.00 $ 70,954,641.00 0.84 0 1552 CO NO, 9 10/22/2003 $ 187,452.00 $ 71,142,093.00 1.10 0 1552 CO NO. 10 11/19/2003 $ 56,041.00 $ 71,198,134.00 1.18 0 1552 CO NO. 11 12/4/2003 $ 20,680.00 $ 71,218,814.00 1.21 0 1552 CO NO. 12 2/25/2004 $ 22,390.00 $ 71,241,204.00 1.24 0 1552 CO NO. 13 3/24/2004 $ 784.00 $ 71,241,988.00 1.24 0 1552 CO NO. 14 5/26/2004 $ 67,455.00 $ 71,309,443.00 1.34 0 1552 CO NO. 15 10/27/2004 $ 67,937.00 $ 71,377,380.00 1.44 143 1695 CO NO. 16 12/15/2004 $ (160,121.00) $ 71,217,259.00 1.21 0 1695 CO NO. 17 2/23/2005 $ 127,478.00 $ 71,344,737.00 1 1.39 0 1695 CO NO. 18 3/23/2005 $ 61,690.00 $ 71,406,427.00 1.48 0 1695 CO NO.;19 Pending $. 1163710.00 $ 71,523,137.00 1,64 0 1695 Approved by PDC Committee per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 EDMsro03787405 ' Approved by General Manager per delagated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 Q Page 1 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Nineteen (19) Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Oed-+st) $116,710.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —SEALANT ADDITION AT EFFLUENT LAUNDERS AND CLARIFIER WALLS This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to provide Oakum packing and additional sealant to prevent water flow between the launders and the adjoining walls for Primary Clarifiers 16- 31. During construction the Contractor discovered that the gap between the precast launders and the adjoining walls was too small to allow for installation of the launders. District staff concurred with the finding and required the Contractor to shorten the lengths of the launders. This change increased the size of the gap between the launders and the adjoining walls. The contract documents specify use of Sikaflex for the sealant. The Oakum packing under the sealant will provide a longer lasting and maintenance free seal. The Contractor is being compensated for the Oakum (filler), which was not required pursuant to the contract documents, and for the quantity of Sikaflex sealant in excess of that required to seal the gap provided by the original design. The following additional work and compensation was agreed upon pursuant to Field Change Order No. 209: 1. Oakum packing shall be installed between the ends of launders and the adjoining walls. 2. Sikaflex sealant shall be applied to the Oakum surfaces exposed to water at the outside edges of the launders. 3. Sikaflex sealant shall be applied between the launder weir plates and the adjoining clarifier walls to prevent water flow between the weir plates and the walls. The Contractor will be compensated for 100% of the time and materials involved with item (1). The Contractor will be compensated for 50% of the time and materials involved with items (2 and 3). The Contractor used 125 pounds of the dry Oakum packing material and 19 gallons of Silkaflex sealant to complete the installation. The work was accomplished on Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-209). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $13,170.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days 0 Page 2 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Nineteen (19) Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell ITEM 2—WEST PERIMETER ROAD MANHOLE This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to remove the existing manhole adjusting ring over the 108-inch pipeline in the West Perimeter Road. This item also includes labor, material, and equipment needed to place the concrete collar per drawing C-12 and C-13, replace the manhole adjusting ring with 3-inch adjusting rings in order to bring the manhole cover up to grade, and reinstate the asphalt paving. During the Construction phase of this project District staff discovered that the West Perimeter Road has settled over the 108-inch pipeline. District staff recommended replacement of the manhole adjusting ring in order to eliminate the dip in the road surface and bring the manhole cover up to grade. This additional work included one cubic yard of concrete, 125 square feet of asphalt, and concrete precast adjusting rings. The work was accomplished on Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-223). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,564.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3 —ADDED RESTRICTED ZONES ON CLARIFIER DECK This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to add painted "No Traffic" restricted zones on the existing top deck of Primary Clarifiers 6-15 at four intersections of the North-South and East-West expansion joints. The design consultant has determined that there should be no heavy construction traffic or lay down of materials in these areas due to concerns about the impact of these loads on the structure. These restricted zones were required to designate that heavy equipment is restricted from these areas. This additional work included miscellaneous painting material. The work was accomplished on Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-206). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,845.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4— BASIN DRAIN EQUALIZATION CONNECTIONS This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to add two connections to the Primary Clarifiers 16-31 main gallery drain lines. One connection ties to the Primary Clarifiers 16-30 basin drain line and the other connection ties to the Primary Clarifiers 17-31 basin drain line to allow equalization of the water level between basins 16-30 and basins 17-31. This change was requested by Operation's staff. This modification will allow the District to connect the drain line for Primary Clarifiers 16-30 to the drain line for Primary Clarifiers 17-31 with an 8-inch hose to equalize the water level between the eastside and westside basins. Equal flow across each basin is necessary in order Page 3 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Nineteen (19) Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell to optimize primary treatment and minimize chemical costs. Each connection will add the following: (1) 10-inch x 8-inch Victaulic tee with a coupling (1) 8-inch plug valve (valve provided by the District) (1) 8-inch pipe support (1) 8-inch victaulic flange (1) 8-inch blind flange The work was accomplished on Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-236). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,147.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5 —ADDED STRUCTURUAL SUPPORT FOR FANS / DUCTS /BYPASS LINE This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to add structural reinforcement to penetrations made in the top deck of Primary Clarifiers 6-15 for three fans (11 CFAN239, 11 CFAN240, and 11 DFAN580) and two 36-inch foul air ducts located on the existing Primary Clarifiers 6-15 deck. Work remaining for the last remaining fan (11 DFAN581) is Phase 2 work and will be performed under a future separate Field Change Order. This item also includes additional temporary structural support for the bypass piping installed in the new Primary Clarifiers 16-31 deck pursuant to Field Change Order No. 120. Upon review of the contract documents, District staff discovered that additional structural reinforcement was needed to reinforce the existing Primary Clarifiers 6-15 top deck as a result of removing concrete reinforcing steel at each penetration. In addition, temporary support was needed for the temporary bypass line to be installed in the new clarifier deck as required as part of the Contract work. This additional work included welding services, (8) 3/4— inch anchor plates, (6) 4x4 angle irons and expansion anchors, epoxy, grout, and miscellaneous materials required to complete the installation. No additional compensation was provided for the installation of the fans or ducts because that work is included pursuant to the contract documents. The work was accomplished on Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-178, FCO-P137-179, and FCO-P137-196). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $18,752.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days 4 Page 4 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Nineteen (19) Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell ITEM 6—ADDED CURB, GUTTER, AND GUARD POSTS This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to add curb, gutter, and guard posts to the Fuentes and West Perimeter Roads near the Primary Clarifiers 16-31 effluent distribution structures. The new effluent distribution structures protrude past the curb face. The curbs and guard posts provide delineation to separate the structures from the roadway. This item is needed for traffic safety and was not shown on the contract plans. This additional work included five guard posts and one cubic yard of concrete. The work was accomplished on Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-197). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,536.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 7— EXISTNG ROADWAY MODIFICATIONS This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to remove two existing vehicle access control devices (a spike strip and a security island) on Fuentes Road near the North Perimeter Road. These devices are not in use and would be located within the new contract specified containment area for chemical truck unloading. As a result, the Contractor was required to remove the truck loading obstructions. This item included saw cutting operations (removal) and paving work (aggregate and base) necessary to bring the truck loading area up to a useable condition. The work was accomplished on Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-131). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,320.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8—ADDITIONAL PUMP RENTAL FOR EFFLUENT STRUCTURE TIE-INS This item adds pumping equipment required to reduce shut-down time of the primary treatment facilities as required by Operation's staff. This item provides additional pump rental for dewatering the 108-inch primary effluent pipelines in Fuentes Road and West Perimeter Road, as needed to perform tie-in work on the connections from the effluent distribution structures to the 10-foot pipelines. This supplements the Contractor's equipment which was required in the contract documents. The contract documents require the Contractor to provide pumps for dewatering. However, District staff requires minimal shut-down time required for this work. This change provides additional pump equipment to reduce the time required for dewatering, therefore reducing the total time required for the shut-down. The added cost associated with this item included a one week pump rental (8-inch hydraulic submersible pump and hose) for each of the two effluent distribution structures. The work was S Page 5 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Nineteen (19) Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell accomplished on Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-222). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,886.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 9—TRANSFER OF PLANT WATER BETWEEN NEW BASINS This item provides compensation for labor only to transfer plant water from the westside primary clarifiers into the eastside primary clarifiers to complete eastside testing activities. The Contractor had pumped all test water to the eastside basins for testing purposes applicable to the eastside basin equipment. Due to an impending storm event, OCSD operations required all clarifiers, both eastside and westside, to be equalized with the same amount of water to improve potential storage capacity. Therefore, 50% of the water located on the eastside was transferred back to the westside using the clarifier drain system. This requirement was imposed on the Contractor as part of the District's Peak Flow Management Program in order to minimize the impact of peak flow storm events. This change compensates the Contractor for pumping the test water back to the eastside basins to complete the required testing activities. The work was accomplished on Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-242). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,890.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 10—ADDED STRUCTURAL SUPPORT AT CABLE TRAY BRIDGE Additional structural supports to the new cable tray bridge were required to provide a complete stable installation. Approximately 192 feet of galvanized H-beam and angle supports were added to the specified cable tray bridge. The material costs associated with this item were paid for in a previous change order (C.O. No. 17, Item 4). This item includes costs for labor only to field erect additional portions of cable tray bridge. The work was accomplished on Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P1 37-170.1). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $10,582.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days v Page 6 of 10 • ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Nineteen (19) Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell ITEM 11 —SAMPLER ELECTRICAL POWER CONNECTION PEDB This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to provide a "plug"type electrical power connection in lieu of the specified "hard-wired" type connection for the effluent sampler unit located at the existing primary effluent distribution box (PEDB). Signal connections to and from the PLC remain as specified by the Contract Documents. This change was needed in order to make this installation consistent with other sampler installations at the District and was requested by District Operation's staff. This item included a single gang O-CAL box, a 20 amp receptacle, and a weatherproof cover. The work was accomplished on Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-241). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $290.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 12— 12-INCH RECLAIMED WATER PIPELINE This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to provide a connection to the existing reclaimed water system which will be used to provide additional water for clarifier testing and future operations and maintenance use. The Contractor required an additional water connection in order to fill the clarifiers for testing purposes required under contract. The additional connection was not required pursuant to the contract documents. This item will allow operations and maintenance staff to make use of another water source on the deck of the clarifiers providing enhanced operability. This item included; hot tapping the existing 12-inch pipeline in the P1-33 scum gallery, providing a vertical 6-inch connection and valve with a chain operator, coring the deck, extending the pipe above the deck with a 6-inch gate valve, hydrostatic testing of the piping installation, and repairing the concrete around the pipe penetration. The work was accomplished on Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-199). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $9,716.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 13—VALVE LIMIT SWITCH MODIFICATIONS This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to modify (75) valve limit switches for the following applications; sludge pump suction valves, scum pit isolation valves, thickened sludge valves, dilute sludge valves, polymer feed suction valves, polymer solution tank isolation valves, and the polymer solution transfer pump valves. The limit switches provided pursuant to the contract documents required modifications to provide valve status to the SCADA system. Following the design phase of this project the District's software standards changed. As a result, this change was required Page 7 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Nineteen (19) Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell to make the valve limit switches consistent with similar installations at the District and accommodates the recently revised standards. The changes included rewiring, revising tag numbers, and revising associated drawings. To minimize the cost impact of this change OCSD staff will make changes to the SAT database, CRISP, and PLC. The work associated with this Change Order item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-247). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $12,933.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 14— MOTOR CONTROL CENTER MODIFICATIONS This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to add Motor Control Center (MCC) "ready" lights to monitor equipment status of the Polymer Distribution System MCC. The District's standard specification was updated to include this requirement after the P1-37 design was complete. The standard was updated to meet current OSHA requirements. The MCC "ready" lights are required to indicate the equipment is ready to operate in the local mode. This item included (8) pilot lights, (8) nameplates, and ancillary wiring and wire terminals. The work associated with this Change Order item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-250). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,072.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 15— PRESSURE SWITCH ADDITION This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to add a pressure switch (11 HPSHL050) to the Chemical Feed Facility Makedown Water Booster Pump. The pressure switch is required for water pressure booster pump control. The pressure switch was not shown on the contract documents. This item includes the purchase of the switch, installation, calibration, testing, and associated documentation updates (revised drawings, updated operation & maintenance manuals, additional programming, etc...). The work associated with this Change Order item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137- 251). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,739.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days D Page 8 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Nineteen (19) Date: April27. 2005 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell ITEM 16— CONCRETE CURBS EXTENSIONS This item is for labor, material, and equipment required to extend the contract specified curbs located around the aluminum covers on the deck of the Primary Clarifiers 16-31. The plans provide concrete curbs to prevent vehicular access to the aluminum covers. During construction it was discovered that the walkway openings between the curb were wide enough for District utility carts to pass through. Because the covers are not designed to support the weight of the carts it is necessary to prevent cart access to this area. The work extends the concrete curbs by six inches on each side of the walkway openings in 52 locations. The work was accomplished on Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-164). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $15,865.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 17—SCUM TIPPING TROUGH MODIFICATIONS This item is for material only required to relocate the rest position proximity switch for all (52) scum collector tipping troughs (Phase 1 & Phase 2) to the tip leaver arm. During review of the Scum Collection System Functional Acceptance Test results the District noted that if a tipping trough shear pin fails there is no type of alarm notifying the operator of the condition. Relocating the "Rest" position proximity switch to the tipping trough leaver arm provides the necessary hardware modifications to facilitate a "Fail to Tip" alarm. There is no specified requirement for this feature, however, the manufacturer and the District agreed to share in the cost of adding this alarm. Pursuant to agreements made between the District and the manufacturer Polytech, Polytech will absorb field labor costs and costs required to update the associated documentation. Reimbursable material for this change includes the following: 1. New proximity switches (52)with long pigtails to reach the tip leaver arm. 2. New stainless steel brackets (52) and applicable nuts and bolts to hold each relocated proximity switch. 3. Cost for independent fabrication facility to drill and tap tipping trough leaver arms (52) to hold relocated proximity switch magnet. The work was accomplished on Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-248). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $8,403.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 9 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Nineteen 0 9) Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $116,710.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order. District and Contractor agree that the added cost described above constitutes full and equitable consideration for all the impacts incurred by the Contractor, and no other direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: January 7, 2002 Original Contract Time: 1,400 Days Original Completion Date: November 7,2005 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Days Total Contract Time Extension: 295 Days Revised Contract Time: 1,695 Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: August 29, 2006 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A Actual Final Completion Date: N/A Original Contract Price $ 70,366,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 1,040,427.00 This Change (Add) (Pedust) $ 116,710.00 Amended Contract Price $ 71,523,137.00 Page 10 of 10 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Nineteen (19) Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Board Authorization Date: April 27, 2005 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: Dean Fisher, P.E. Date CIP Project Manager Approved by: David A. Ludwin, P.E. Date Director of Engineering Accepted by: MARGATE CONSTRUCTION Contractor Date EDMS/003787358 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 04/07/05 04/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC05-29 13(0 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David A. Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Hardat Khublall, CIP Project Manager SUBJECT: GISLER-REDHILL TRUNK IMPROVEMENTS. REACH "A". CONTRACT NO. 7-36; ORANGE TRUNK IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 7-39; GISLER-REDHILL/NORTH TRUNK IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 7-41; AND CITY OF TUSTIN PROJECT NOS. 6106 AND 6151 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Gisler-Redhill Trunk Improvements, Reach "A", Contract No. 7-36; Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39; Gisler-Redhill/North Trunk Improvements. Contract No. 7-41; and City of Tustin Project Nos. 6106 and 6151 , with ARB, Inc.. authorizing an addition of $571,975 and 20 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $19,466,809. SUMMARY Background • Contract No. 7-41. located in the City of Tustin, City of Orange, and unincorporated areas of the County of Orange, consists of improvements to relieve hydraulic deficiencies on the Gisler-Redhill North Trunk Sewer in Newport Avenue, El Camino Real, and Prospect Avenue. Contract No. 7-39 is located in the City of Tustin and in the unincorporated areas of the County of Orange, and consists of improvements to relieve hydraulic deficiencies on the Orange Trunk Sewer in Holt Avenue, 17tn Street. and Hewes Avenue. Contract No. 7-36, located in the City of Tustin, consists of improvements to relieve hydraulic deficiencies on the Gisler-Redhill Trunk Sewer Improvements in Redhill Avenue from Mitchell Avenue to La Colina Drive. The 1999 Strategic Plan identified these reaches of sewers as hydraulically deficient and in need of replacement. • AKM Consulting Engineers prepared the plans and specifications and the construction contract was awarded to ARB, Inc. on January 28, 2004. • Change Order No. 3 includes eight items of additional work to Contract No. 7-39 and Contract No. 7-41. There are three unknown conditions, two correctable design errors, and three "other" in this Change Order. The contract includes liquidated damages of $1,000 per day and no bonus provisions. Page 1 Contract Schedule Contract Start Date April 5, 2004 Original Contract Completion Date November 25, 2005 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 3 Current Contract Completion Date December 30, 2005 Revised Completion Date January 19, 2006 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Liquidated Damages Assessment N/A Change Order No. 3 Content Item No. Description Amount Days Type Contract No. 7-39 1 Undisclosed Utilities 18,423 0 Unknown Conditions 2 House Laterals 36,379 0 Correctable Design Error 3 Asphalt Overlay Coordination (41,602) 0 Other with County of Orange Contract No. 7-41 4 Extension of Old Town 69,466 0 Other Boundaries 5 Alignment Change from Station 291,309 15 Unknown 78+00 to Station 85+00 Conditions 6 Sewer Work Postponement 4,781 5 Unknown Conditions 7 Additional Asphalt from Station 143,219 0 Correctable 68+50 to Station 112+00 Design Error 8 Construction Permit 50,000 0 Other Total — Change Order No. 3 $571,975 20 Item 1 — This item is for exposing. protecting. and replacing utilities not shown or incorrectly marked on the contract drawings. Item 2 — This item is for connecting two existing house sewer laterals not shown on contract drawings. The first lateral required an additional drop-in connection that was omitted and the second lateral required connection to the new sewer which was omitted on contract drawings. Item 3 — This item is for a credit due to the deletion of a portion of the asphalt overlay on Hewes Avenue. The County of Orange (County) awarded a contract for final asphalt overlay of a section of the same street included under the contract. The County requested OCSD to delete the installation of the asphalt overlay on this portion, since their contract includes overlay of the entire street section (curb to curb), and the County postponed their contract to allow completion of the sewer construction. Page 2 Item 4 —This item is for premium time and weekend work required when the City of Tustin extended the Old Town sewer work boundaries specified in the contract. Per contract, sewer construction within the City of Tustin's Old Town area was to be complete within 150 days after notice to proceed. This item was necessary so that the revised limits of the Old Town area could be completed within the 150 calendar days as originally specified. Item 5 —This item is to reroute the proposed Contract No. 7-41 sewer to avoid conflicts with an existing 6-inch waterline that was incorrectly shown between Stations 78+00 through 85+00. The waterline is shown to be located eleven feet to the west of the proposed sewer, but it was discovered during construction that it was actually only one to two feet west of the proposed sewer. The contract drawings were prepared based on information shown on City of Tustin's water atlas. Please see "ADDITIONAL INFORMATION" section for this item. Additional alignment changes are anticipated up through Station 166+08 due to an undisclosed fiber optics line discovered during construction. Item 6 —This item is for standby costs due to a five-day main line work postponement. The contractor was ready to install the proposed new 27-inch sewer, north of sewer Station 55+86, but the contractor's request to the City of Tustin for continuation of work was not permitted until the final asphalt overlay and street striping was completed from sewer Stations 43+00 through 55+86, even though the contractor's open trench and working length limits were within contract requirements. Item 7 —This item is to remove and replace asphalt pavement that was not disclosed in the contract documents from sewer Stations 68+50 through 112+00. Field crews continue to encounter existing pavement thicker than indicated on the geotechnical investigation report and additional costs will be included in a future change order. Item 8 —This item is for additional inspection fees required by the City of Tustin (City). The inspection fees provided for in the original permit are insufficient to cover City's inspection costs to complete the project. Job Completion The contract is now 48% complete. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS The construction contract was awarded by the Board on January 28, 2004 for a lump sum of$18,375,999. Please refer to the attached Change Order Status Report for information on all previous change orders. Page 3 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 18,375,999 • Previously Authorized Change Order $ 518,835 This Change Order (Add) $ 571,975 Change Orders to Date $ 1,090,810 Percent Increase to Date 5.94% Amended Contract Price $ 19,466,809 BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Contract No. 7-41 FY 04/05, Section 8, Page 43, Contract No. 7-39 FY 04/05, Section 8, Page 41 Capital Improvement Program, Collections Facilities, Facilities Engineering Projects-Collections) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background for Item 5: The proposed Contract 7-41 sewer was rerouted north of sewer Station 64+35 to avoid conflicts with existing utilities encountered that were either not shown on the contract documents or were found to vary off the locations shown on the drawings. The conflicting utilities are an existing 6-inch waterline from sewer Stations 64+35 through 95+00, and a fiber optic encasement from sewer Stations 102+70 through 166+08. The waterline is closer to the revised alignment, and requires protection that would not have been necessary if it was located where shown on the plans. The fiber optic encasement was installed after sewer design was completed, and interferes with the proposed sewer. This item also includes a negotiated settlement between OCSD and contractor from sewer Stations 80+00 through 85+00. In this area, the contractor believes that special shoring (beam and plate system) is required due to the proximity of the revised alignment to the waterline, and that conventional shoring systems (speed shores, trench box, and speed rail systems) are not effective at this location. Based on the soil borings included in the project geotechnical report, Staff believes that the use of conventional shoring methods are not suitable in this area even in the original alignment. However, the close proximity of the waterline made beam and plate shoring necessary in this area. The alignment changes will continue up to sewer Station 166+08 and additional costs will be included in a future change order. ALTERNATIVES None Page 4 CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Tables - 7-39/7-41 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Location and Photo Description of Change Order No. 3 RC:Ic H:\ntgfobal\Agenda Draft ReportsTD07-36, et al,AR CO#3.doc Page 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE ORANGE TRUNK IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT NO. 7-39, CO#3 PROPOSED ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROP08ED ., i ESTIMATED'-., BUDGET E8TIM/1TS[� PROJECTIPHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENbiD TO INCREASE BUDGET BUDGET /DECREASE BUDGET DATE REQUEST_ AUTHORIZATION TO DATE 'k ; DA7E�'}�.� Phase 1 -Project Development $ 46,000 $ 46,564 $ 46,564 $ 46,564 $ 46,564 $ 46,564 100% Phase 2-Preliminary Design $ 1,000 $ 1,391 $ 1,391 $ 1.391 $ 1,391 $ 1,391 100% Phase 3-Des n $ 396,000 $ 411,471 $ 411,471 $ 411.471 $ 411,471 $ 411.471 100% Phase 4-Construction $ 4,250,000 $ 4,671,945 $ 13.200 $ 4,685,145 $ 4.671,945 $ 13,200 $ 4,685 145 $ 4,604,233 98% Phase 5-Commissioning $ 61,000 $ 61,735 $ 61,735 $ - Phase 6-Close-Out $ 17,000 $ 15,434 $ 15,434 $ Phase 7-Contingency $ 527,000 $ 89,389 $ 13,200 $ 76,189 $ - PROJECT TOTAL 1 $ 5,298,0001 $ 5,297,9291 $ - $ 5.297.929 1 $ 5,131,371 $ 13,2001 $ 5,144,571 $ 5,063.659 98% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 5,298.000 $ 5.297,929 1 $ - $ 5,297,929 1 $ 5.131,371 1 $ 13,200 $ 5,144,571 $ 5,063,659 98% PSA/Contract Design PSA $ 224,098 $ 232.297 1 1 $ 232.297 $ 232,297 1 $ 232,297 $ 224,000 96% Construction Contract $ 4,113.733 1 $ 4,275,854 1 $ 13,200 $ 4.289,054 H $ 4,275,854 $ 13,200 $ 4,289.054 1 $ 4,178.292 97% EDMS:003787372 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GISLER-REDHILLINORTH TRUNK IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT NO. 7-41, CO#3 PROPOSED ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED BUDGET PROJECTIPHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE. EXPENDED TO INCREASE/DECREASE BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE DATEtkl Phase 1 -Project Develo ment $ 40,000 $ 39,484 $ 39,484 $ 39,484 $ 39,484 $ 39.484 100% Phase 2-PreliminaryDesign $ 1,000 $ 6,212 $ 6,212 $ 6,212 $ 6,212 $ 6,212 100% Phase 3-Design $ 628,000 $ 632,690 $ 632,690 $ 632,690 $ 632,690 $ 632,690 100% Phase 4-Construction $ 13.128,000 $ 13,524,893 $ 13,524,893 $ 13,524,893 $ 13,524,893 $ 5,076,504 38% Phase 5-Commissioning $ 183,000 $ 183,581 $ 183,581 $ 183,581 $ 183,581 $ 14,340 8% Phase 6-Close-Out $ 45,000 $ 45,615 $ 45,615 $ 45,615 $ 45,615 $ 3,305 7% Phase 7-Contingency $ 1,334,000 $ 926,232 $ 926,232 $ - PROJECT TOTAL 1 $ 15,359,000 1 $ 15,358,707 $ $ 15,358,707 $ 14,432,475 $ - $ 14,432,475 $ 5,772,535 40% Reimbursable Costs $ 665,211 1 $ 665,211 $ 665,211 $ 665,211 PROJECT NET $ 15.359,000 1 $ 14,693,496 $ - $ 14,693,496 $ 13.767,264 $ - $ 13.767.264 $ 5,772,535 42% PSAIContract Des n PSA $ 368,684 $ 406,174 1 $ 406.174 $ 406,174 1 $ 406,174 $ 358.755 88% Construction Contract $ 9,350.612 $ 10,606,766 1 $ 558,775 $ 11,165,541 $ 10,606,766 $ 558,775 $ 11.165.541 1 $ 4,754.958 43% EMS:003787373 CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT GISLER-REDHILL TRUNK SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, ORANGE TRUNK SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, AND GISLER-REDHILL NORTH TRUNK SEWER CONTRACT NOS. 7-36, 7-39, AND 7-41 AND CITY OF TUSTIN PROJECT NUMBERS 6106 AND 6151 - CO #3 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM TIME TO DATE DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 1/28/2004 $18,376,999 $18,375,999 0.00% 600 600 CO NO. 1 11/24/2004 $349,612 $18,725,611 1.90% 20 620 CO NO. 2 2/23/2005 $169,223 $18,894,834 2.82% 15 636 CO NO. 2 Pending $571,975 $19,466,809 5.94% 20 655 EDMS:003787374 1k Page 1 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: ARB Inc. C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Gisler Redhill North Trunk Sewer, Reach "A". Contract No. 7-36: Orange Trunk Improvements,Contract No.7-39: Gisler Redhill/North Trunk Sewer Improvements; Contract No. 7-41: and City of Tustin Proiect Numbers 6106, and 6151 Consultant: AKM Consulting Engineers Amount of this Change Order (Add) $571,975.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Contract No. 7-39 ITEM 1 — UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES This item is for additional labor, material and equipment associated with undisclosed, unmarked or mismarked utilities crossing the trench of the proposed new sewer. The undisclosed utilities consisted of two 6-inch Kinder Morgan fuel lines at Station 10+30, a 6-inch waterline at Station 22+75, three sewer house connections between Stations 20+00 to 27+80, a 6-inch waterline at Station 27+80, and a 16-inch waterline and a 24-inch storm drain at Station 168+23. The extra work consisted of additional exploratory excavations for utility locating, additional trench excavation, special shoring, utility protection, replacement and repair. This item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account in accordance with Division 1, Section 44(B)2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO 21). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $18,423.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2—HOUSE LATERALS This item is for additional costs associated with the connection of two 8-inch sewer laterals at sewer Stations 29+06 and 29+80. Both laterals were shown on the contract drawings, but the first lateral required a drop-in connection that was not shown and the second lateral required connection to the new sewer which was also not shown on the contract drawings. The extra work consisted of traffic control, pavement removal, excavation, special shoring, installation of an additional 60-inch pre-cast concrete manhole, reconnection of sewer laterals, backfill and paving. This item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account in accordance with Division 1, Section 44(B)2 of the General Requirements. (Reference FCO 24). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $36,379.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days 9 Page 2 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: ARB Inc. C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Gisler Redhill North Trunk Sewer, Reach "A". Contract No. 7-36; Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39;Gisler Redhill/North Trunk Sewer Improvements; Contract No. 7-41; and City of Tustin Project Numbers 6106, and 6151 Consultant: AKM Consulting Engineers ITEM 3—ASPHALT OVERLAY COORDINATION WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE This item is for a negotiated credit due to the deletion of the final asphalt overlay along Hewes Avenue, between Dodge Avenue and Seventeenth Street intersections, approximate sewer Stations 116+50 to 143+00. The County of Orange, Resources & Development Management Department (RDMD) awarded a contract for final asphalt overlay of the same street included under the contract. RDMD requested OCSD to delete the installation of the asphalt overlay on this portion of Hewes Avenue, since RDMD's contract includes overlay of the entire street section (curb to curb). RDMD postponed their asphalt overlay contract to allow completion of the sewer construction. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Division 1, Section 44(B)1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO 26). CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($41,602.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Contract No. 7-41 ITEM 4— EXTENSION OF OLD TOWN BOUNDARIES This item compensates the Contractor for the extra cost associated with the extension of the Old Town work boundaries. The contract documents specify that sewer main replacements and improvements between sewer Stations 10+32.64 and 43+22.22 shall be completed within 150 days after the notice to proceed. During construction, the City of Tustin extended the contract boundaries of Old Town work up to sewer Station 55+85.92. The Contractor had to allocate additional resources in order to meet the 150 day milestone. This item compensates the Contractor for premium time and weekend work, and was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account in accordance with Division 1, Section 44(B)2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO 16). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $69,466.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days V Page 3 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: ARB Inc. C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Gisler Redhill North Trunk Sewer, Reach "A". Contract No. 7-36: Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39: Gisler Redhill/North Trunk Sewer Improvements: Contract No. 7-41: and City of Tustin Proiect Numbers 6106, and 6151 Consultant: AKM Consulting Engineers ITEM 5 —ALIGNMENT CHANGE FROM STATION 78+00 TO STATION 85+00 This item is for additional costs for a revised sewer alignment due to undisclosed or incorrectly shown utilities conflicting with the proposed sewer from Station 78+00 through Station 85+00. An existing 6- inch ACP waterline routed parallel to the proposed sewer is shown eleven feet to the west of the proposed sewer on the plans. During construction, it was discovered that the waterline is actually only one to two feet west of the proposed sewer. A revised alignment was proposed and located the new sewer five to six feet east of the waterline. The close proximity of the existing 6-inch waterline required protection that would have been not necessary if the waterline was located where shown on contract drawings. This item includes a negotiated settlement between OCSD and Contractor between Stations 80+00 through 85+00. In this section, Contractor believes that special shoring (beam and plate system) is required due to the proximity of the revised alignment to the waterline, and that conventional shoring systems (speed shores, trench box and speed rail systems) are not effective at this location. Based on the soil borings included in the project geotechnical report, Staff believes that the use of conventional shoring methods are not suitable in this area even in the original alignment. The extra work consisted of additional exploratory excavations for utility locating, additional trench excavation, special shoring, utility protection, replacement and repair. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Division 1, Section 44(B)l and 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO 22 and 23, CO No.2 - Item 9). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $291,309.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 15 Calendar Days ITEM 6 —SEWER WORK POSTPONEMENT This item compensates the Contractor for standby time due to a five day main line work postponement. The Contractor was ready to install the proposed new 27-inch sewer, north of sewer Station 55+86 on Monday August 23, 2004. Per City of Tustin request continuation of work was not permitted until the final asphalt overlay and street striping was completed from sewer Stations 43+00 through 55+86. Contractor's open trench and working length limits were within Contract requirements, but Contractor was directed to stop the mainline operation for a period of five days until remaining work was completed. This item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account in accordance with Division 1, Section 44(B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO 30). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,781.00 v Page 4 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: ARB Inc. C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Gisler Redhill North Trunk Sewer, Reach "A". Contract No. 7-360 Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39;Gisler Redhill/North Trunk Sewer Improvements; Contract No. 7-41; and City of Tustin Project Numbers 6106, and 6151 Consultant: AKM Consulting Engineers TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days ITEM 7 —ADDITIONAL ASPHALT FROM STATION 68+50 TO STATION 112+00 This is an ongoing item associated with the removal and replacement of undisclosed asphalt from sewer Stations 68+50 through 112+00. Borings taken during the geotechnical investigation performed as part of the project design indicated an asphalt thickness varying from three inches to eight inches. Up to twenty four inches of asphalt was actually encountered at these locations. In addition, the City of Tustin requested that the thickness replaced conformed with City of Tustin's street index standards for asphalt replacement. Field crews continue to encounter paving thicker than indicated on the geotechnical investigation report. Those costs will be included in a future change order. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 44(B)1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO 32, CO No.2 - Item 7). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $143,219.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8 —CONSTRUCTION PERMIT This item is to compensate the Contractor for additional permit and inspection fees required by City of Tustin's Public Right of Way Encroachment and Construction Permit No. 3888. The amount provided in the original permit was expended by the City of Tustin. An additional deposit was requested to cover future costs. Funds are used to cover project inspection, attendance to construction meetings, additional revisions to revised traffic control plans, traffic control signal services, overtime work and final project inspection. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 44(B)1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO 33). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $50,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $571,975.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 20 Calendar Days Page 5 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: ARB INC C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Gisler Redhill North Trunk Sewer, Reach "A". Contract No. 7-36: Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-39: Gisler Redhill/North Trunk Sewer Improvements: Contract No. 7-41: and City of Tustin Protect Numbers 6106, and 6151 Consultant: AKM Consulting Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that a 20 day extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: April 5, 2004 Original Contract Time: 600 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: November 25, 2005 Time Extension this C.O.: 20 Days Total Contract Time Extension: 55 Days Revised Contract Time: 655 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: January 19, 2006 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A Actual Final Completion Date: N/A Original Contract Price $18,375,999.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 518,835.00 This Change (Add) $ 571,975.00 Amended Contract Price $19,466,809.00 Page 6 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: ARB INC C.O. No.: Three 3 Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Gisler Redhill North Trunk Sewer, Reach "A". Contract No. 7-36: Orange Trunk Improvements, Contract No.7-39; Gisler Redhill/North Trunk Sewer Improvements; Contract No. 7-41: and City of Tustin Project Numbers 6106, and 6151 Consultant: AKM Consulting Engineers Board Authorization Date: April 27, 2005 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: Hardat Khublall Date CIP Project Manager Approved by: David A. Ludwin, P.E. Date Director of Engineering Accepted by: ARB INC Contractor Date EDMS:003787338 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 4/7/2005 4/27/2005 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC05-30 13(g) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin. Director of Engineering Originator: CT Bien, Project Manager SUBJECT: TENANT IMPROVEMENTS TO REBUILD SHOP AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. J-89 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 for Tenant Improvements to Rebuild Shop at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-89, with Dalke and Sons Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of $16,011 and 80 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $128,901; and (2) Accept Tenant Improvements to Rebuild Shop at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-89, as complete, and approve the Final Closeout Agreement. SUMMARY Background • This project consists of removing the existing interior office structure and constructing a new 700 square foot area with a multi-purpose (meeting/training/lunch) room, kitchenette, and a men's locker room in the Rebuild Shop at Plant No. 1 . Also included in this project are modifications to the men's and women's bathrooms in Maintenance Building No. 6 to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). • The plans and specifications were prepared by RMS Engineering & Design, Inc., and the contract was awarded to Dalke and Sons Construction, Inc. on April 23, 2004. • Change Order No. 1 includes five items of added work and an 80 calendar day time extension. There are three non-reimbursable design errors and no reimbursable errors associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $200 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date June 7,. 2004 Original Contract Completion Date August 15. 2004 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date August 15, 2004 Actual Completion Date November 3, 2004 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages N/A Page 1 r Change Order No. 1 r Item No. Description Amount Days Type 1 Water Heater Circuit 417 0 Non- Reimburseable Design Error 2 Change HVAC Unit; Add Insulation 8,970 32 Non- Reimburseable Design Error 3 Bathroom Counter Tops and Cove 2,041 20 Non- Base Reimburseable Design Error 4 Roof Access Ladder 3,722 28 Design Change 5 Garbage Disposal 861 0 Design Change Total — Change Order No. 1 $16,011 80 Item 1 adds an electrical circuit for an electric hot water heater. The circuit was not shown on the contract drawings. Item 2 changes the contract specified indoor roof mounted Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning (HVAC) package unit to a split system with a separate blower and condenser. The package unit was not approved for indoor use. Item 3 adds cove base around the bottom of the kitchen cabinets and exterior of the interior office building. This also modifies bathroom countertops to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This work was not shown on the contract drawings. Item 4 adds a roof access ladder to provide service access to the roof mounted HVAC blower equipment. The ladder was not shown on the contract drawings but was requested by staff for maintenance purposes. Item 5 adds a garbage disposal and dedicated electrical circuit to the kitchen to provide disposal of food debris. The disposer and circuit were not included in the contract, but were requested by staff. Job Completion This project is 100% complete. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS The Contract was awarded by the PDC Committee to Dalke and Sons Construction, Inc. On March 4, 2004. Page 2 i PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY L Original Contract Price $ 112,890 Previously Authorized Changes $ 0 This Change $ 16,011 Change Orders to Date $ 16,011 Percentage Increase to Date 14.2% Final Contract Price $ 128,901 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item FY2-3/04, Section 8, page. 130) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project is categorically exempt from CEQA requirements ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Location and Photo Description of Change Order JBF:Ic HAntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\J-89 AR C0#1 and COA.doc Page 3 r PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY 4 Original Contract Price $ 112,890 Previously Authorized Changes $ 0 This Change $ 16,011 Change Orders to Date $ 16,011 Percentage Increase to Date 14.2% Final Contract Price $ 128,901 BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item FY2-3/04, Section 8, page. 130) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project is categorically exempt from CEQA requirements ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Location and Photo Description of Change Order JBF:lc HAntg1oba1\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC1J-89 AR C0#1 and COA.doc Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE TENANT IMPROVEMENTS TO REBUILD SHOP AT PLANT 1 JOB NO. J-89 PROPOSED }' I. r ,' '.'.�.t. ..,. «; !.?„ .•; ORIGINAL CURREFIT PROPOSED FUNDS 1HI atO OBEDa ESTIYAT� ESTiA�1T� iPROJECT/PHA8E AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGE f REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL'" EXPENbITURE EXPENDED TO BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET BATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE' /DECREASE 'i < Phase 1 -Project Development $ 7,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 206 0% Phase 2-Preliminary Design $ 6,000 $ 134 $ 134 $ 134 $ - $ 134 550 410% Phase 3-Design $ 61,000 $ 52,793 $ 52,793 $ 52,793 $ 52,793 63,400.00 120% Phase 4-Construction $ 194,000 $ 238,015 $ 16,011 $ 254,026 $ 238,015 $ 16,011 $ 254,026 145,126.00 57% Phase 5- Commissionin $ 143 $ 143 $ 143 $ 143 $ 143 100% Phase 6-Close-Out $ 9.000 $ 1,415 $ 1,415 $ 1,415 $ 1.415 $ 4,918 348% Phase 7-Contingency $ 44,000 $ 28,500 $ 16,011 $ 12,489 . ` $ - $ - $ - 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 321,000 $ 321.000 $ - $ 321,000 '`%:i $ 292,500 $ 16,011 $ 308,511 $ 214,343 69% Reimbursable Costs PROJECT NET 1 $ 321,000 $ 321,000 $ - $ 321,000 $ 292,500 $ 16,011 $ 308,511 $ 214,343 15% PSA/Contract Design PSA $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 100% Construction Contract $ 141,800 $ 112.890 $ 16,011 $ 128,901 $ 112,890 $ 16,011 $ 128.901 $ 128,901 100% EDMS:003787384 - r CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Tenant Improvemants to Rebuild Shop at Plant No. 1 JOB NO. J-89 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME ITEM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE OR TIME TO DATE DECREASE (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 6/7/2004 $112,890 $112,890 0.00% 70 70 CO NO. 1 Pending $16,011 $128,901 14.18% 80 150 EDMS:003787378 Page 1 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Dalke& Sons Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Tenant Improvements to Rebuild Shop at Plant No. 1 Job No. J-89 Consultant: RMS Engineering & Design, Inc. Amount of this Change Order (Add) $16,011 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 — WATER HEATER CIRCUIT The Contractor was directed to add circuits for an electric hot water heater and duplex outlets in the new training room kitchen. The work included 50 LF of 3/-inch EMT Conduit and #12 wire. The electrical circuits were not shown on the contract drawings and were necessary to provide power for the new electric water heater and duplex outlets in the kitchen area. This additional work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 44 (B) 1) of the General Requirements, Division 01. (Reference FCO No. 1) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 417.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 — MODIFY HVAC AND ADD INSULATION The Contractor was directed to change the Contract specified HVAC (Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning) roof mounted self-contained package unit to a split system. The split system consisted of a compressor located on the north exterior of the main Rebuild Shop Building and a blower unit installed on the roof of the new training room. The work included core drilling the existing concrete building wall for refrigeration lines, constructing a concrete housekeeping pad, and installing protective bollards. The Contract Drawings showed the package HVAC unit installed on the roof of the new training room inside the rebuild shop. The City of Fountain Valley Building Inspector disallowed this installation as the package HVAC unit was not approved for indoor use. The Contractor was also directed to install R30 fiberglass insulation in the attic space of the new training room structure created by new drop ceiling structural framing. A drop ceiling was constructed in the raining room to meet the room height requirement of 9-feet shown on the contract drawings. The City of Fountain Valley Building Inspector required the attic space to be completely filled with 1,800 square feet of insulation to meet California Building Code (CBC) requirements. The Contract Drawing did- not show insulation in the space created by the drop ceiling framing. This additional work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 44(B) 1 of the General Requirements, Division 01. (Reference FCO No. 2) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,970.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 40 Calendar Days Page 2 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Dalke & Sons Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Tenant Improvements to Rebuild Shop at Plant No. 1 Job No. J-89 Consultant: RMS Engineering & Design, Inc. ITEM 3—COVE BASE AND COUNTER TOPS The Contractor was directed to furnish and install approximately 100 LF of rubber cove base on the perimeter of the new meeting room and furnish and install approximately 40 LF of Epoxy cove base around the bottom of interior cabinets. The cove base was not shown on the Contract Drawings and was necessary to provide a finish transition between the floor, walls and cabinets for maintenance and cleaning. In Building No. 6 the Contractor was directed to furnish and install two new ADA (American Disabilities Act) compliant lavatories counter tops in the men's and women's bathrooms and add two door closers. The Contract Drawings did not specify new ADA compliant lavatory countertops and door closers. It was necessary to modify the existing countertops to meet ADA compliance. This involved lowering the height of he counter tops and increasing wheel chair accessibility space in the restrooms. New door closers were necessary to meet ADA requirements for door opening pressure. The additional time associated with this item was caused by the submittal approval and the ordering of materials. This additional work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 44 (B) 1) of the General Requirements, Division 01. (Reference FCO No. 3) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,041.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 20 Calendar Days ITEM 4— ROOF ACCESS LADDER The Contractor was directed to furnish, install, and paint a new 12 ' high steel ladder with safety handrails to provide access to the roof of the meeting room. The access ladder was required by the District Maintenance Department to service the new roof mounted HVAC blower unit. The ladder was not included in the Contract. The shop drawing process, and material procurement and installation delayed the critical path of the project completion. This additional work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 44 (B) 1) of the General Requirements, Division 01. (Reference FCO No. 4) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,722.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 20 Calendar Days ITEM 5— KITCHEN GARBAGE DISPOSAL The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a new garbage disposal and dedicated electrical circuit in the kitchen area of the new meeting room. The work included furnishing and installing the garbage disposal and approximately 100 linear feet of%-inch conduit and #12 wire. The District Maintenance Department requested the addition of the garbage disposal under the sink in order to provide sanitary disposal of employee food debris. The garbage disposal was not included in the Contract. This additional work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 44 (B) 1) of the General Requirements, Division 01. (Reference FCO No. 5) a Page 3 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Dalke & Sons Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Tenant Improvements to Rebuild Shop at Plant No. 1 Job No. J-89 Consultant: RMS Engineering & Design, Inc. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $861.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $16,011.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 80 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this change order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original contract and any extensions to the contract time made by this change order. It is therefore mutually agreed that a time extension of 80 calendar days is required for this change order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses, or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this change order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: June 7, 2004 Original Contract Time: 70 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: August 15, 2004 Time Extension this C.O.: 80 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 80 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 150 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Date: November 3, 2004 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 112,890.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Befit) $ 16,011.00 Amended Contract Price $ 128,901.00 Page 4 of 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Dalke & Sons Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: One 1 Date: April 27, 2005 Job: Tenant Improvements to Rebuild Shop at Plant No. 1 Job No. J-89 Consultant: RMS Engineering & Design, Inc. Board Authorization Date: April 27, 2005 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Submitted by: John D. Linder, P.E. Date Construction Manager Approved by: David A. Ludwin, P.E. Date Director of Engineering Accepted by: Dalke & Sons Construction, Inc. Contractor Date EDMS: 003787377 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 04/07/05 04/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC05-33 13(h) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin. Director of Engineering Originator: David MacDonald, Project Manager SUBJECT: AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS, JOB NO. J-79 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget increase of $1,237,054, increasing the total budget to $6,677,533 and (2) Approve Amendment No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Pirnie. Inc. providing for additional engineering services for Air Quality Improvements, Job No. J-79, for an additional amount of S1.237,054. increasing the total amount not to exceed S3.067,601. SUMMARY • The Orange County Sanitation District (District) is upgrading the existing Central Generation System (CGS) engines at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 to reduce the Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) emissions to comply with the requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1110.2. The District is also evaluating catalytic oxidation to reduce the formaldehyde concentrations in the exhaust from the CGS engines. • The District is currently assessing the health risks associated with toxic air emissions from Plant Nos. 1 and 2. Malcolm Pirnie has a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with the District to conduct toxic air emissions modeling and evaluate the associated off-site health risks for Plant Nos. 1 and 2 for the base line year of 2006. • Malcolm Pirnie is also performing toxic air quality modeling and off-site health risk assessments at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 for the projected conditions in the year 2012, which includes future secondary treatment systems. The scope of work also includes the toxic air quality modeling and health risks associated with standby diesel generators at eight outlying pump stations. • Malcolm Pirnie's engineering services also includes a pilot plant evaluation using one of the CGS engines to evaluate the reduction of the formaldehyde in the engine exhaust. Page 1 • The purpose of J-79, Air Quality Improvements, is to ensure that the District continues to comply with the SCAQMD's rules and regulations controlling the emission of toxic chemicals into the air. Rule 1402 requires the evaluation of health risks to off-site residents and workers, due to toxic air contaminants from existing sources. Rule 1110.2 regulates the emissions, for example NOx, CO and VOCs, from gaseous and liquid-fueled engines. • This Amendment No. 4 will increase Malcolm Pirnie's scope of service to include the development of emissions factors to allow the modeling for Plant Nos. 1 and 2 under the operating conditions for 2012 and in accordance with the SCAQMD's Rule 1402. This Amendment No. 4 will also increase the Consultant's scope of service which will include the design, construction, and operating supervision of a full-scale catalytic oxidizer pilot plant on one engine at Plant No. 2 to evaluate compliance with the proposed revisions to SCAQMD's Rule 1110.2. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS See attached Professional Services Agreement (PSA) Status Report. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See attached Budget Information Table. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, page 90) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The requested action will increase the Malcolm Pirnie PSA authorization from $1,830,547 to $3,067,601 as shown on the attached PSA Status Report. The $1,237,054 increase to the Malcolm Pirnie PSA will come from an increase in the authorized budget. The requested action will increase the budget from S5,440.499 to $6.677,533. The additional funding will come from the District Capital Reserves. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The District entered into an Agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, dated January 7, 2003, to provide engineering services for the preparation of an Emissions Reduction Study for the Central Generation System (CGS) at Plant Nos.1 and 2. This study recommended the modification of the engine turbochargers to reduce the NOx emissions. Page 2 C i The District authorized Amendment No.1 to the Malcolm Pirnie Agreement on March 26, 2003. This amendment increased the scope of services to include the pilot testing of a modified turbocharger at the Kansas State University test facility. The pilot tests verified the ability of the modified turbocharger to provide additional air and minimize NOx production. On September 24, 2003, the District authorized Amendment No. 2 to the Malcolm Pirnie Agreement. This amendment increased the scope of services to provide plant wide toxic air quality modeling at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. The modeling included all process sources, the CGS and all standby diesel generators. The modeling was performed for current conditions (baseline) and conditions which will exist in the year 2006. The modeling protocol complied with SCAQMD requirements. The Air Toxic Emission Reduction Strategic Plan was submitted to the District on November 2004. Amendment No. 2 also included combustion and post combustion pilot testing at Plant No. 1 to reduce formaldehyde emissions from the CGS. Amendment No. 3 to the Malcolm Pirnie Agreement, authorized on September 22, 2004, increased the scope of work to include toxic air quality modeling at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 for conditions which will exist in the year 2012 and included all proposed future secondary treatment facilities. The Malcolm Pirnie model is being used as the basis for the modeling of the future projects for compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1402. The scope of work in Amendment No. 3 also included the toxic air quality modeling of standby diesel generators at eight outlying pump stations and pilot testing for two combustion modification options to the CGS engines to reduce formaldehyde formation in the exhaust. Amendment No. 4 will increase the scope of work for the post combustion pilot testing. Malcolm Pirnie designed a side-stream, post combustion, catalytic oxidation pilot plant at Plant No.1. However, the District, due to operating constraints, has requested that the pilot plant be relocated to Plant No. 2. The Consultant has also obtained a price quote from several contractors to install the pilot plant. These quotes revealed deficiencies in the cost of the current post combustion pilot plant design. In addition, a full scale pilot unit will be built at Plant No. 2 and Malcolm Pirnie will provide additional monitoring and testing services for an extended one-year period. The additional fee requested for the post combustion pilot plant is $839,721. After Malcolm Pirnie initiated the 2012 plant-wide air toxics modeling, they discovered that the basic air emissions characteristics data were not available for input to the health risk model. Amendment No. 4 will increase Malcolm Pirnie's scope of work to include development of this data using the TOXCEM fate transport model and the ISCST3 dispersion model. An additional fee of $397,333 is being requested for this work. Page 3 0 W C A total increase to Malcolm Pirnie's fee of$1,237,054 is being requested and an increase to the authorized budget of $1,237,054 is also being requested. Staff reviewed Malcolm Pirnie's proposal for Amendment No. 4 and compared the scope of work and budget to similar work performed for the District and found the proposed cost to be acceptable. ALTERNATIVES Not authorizing Amendment No. 4 to the Malcolm Pirnie Agreement for post combustion pilot testing may result in failure to meet future VOC standards for the CGS. Without the combustion pilot testing, it is not possible to verify the cost effectiveness of the candidate VOC emissions reduction technology for the CGS engines. Not authorizing Amendment No. 4 to the Malcolm Pirnie Agreement for the 2012 plant-wide air toxics modeling may result in the failure to meet the off-site health risks standards of SCAQMD Rule 1402 in the year 2012. CEQA FINDINGS The project is categorically exempt from CEQA. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Malcolm Pirnie Proposal dated March 3, 2005 DM:eh H:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\J-79 AR 04-07-05.doc Page 4 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS JOB NO.J-79 -a TY PROPOSED ORIGINAL CURRENT P"OpoED- FUNDS THIS -2 tq,-,T"1" -111— A D" BUDGET EXPEND{ bilMii6h AUTHORIZED PROjECT- ,:REVISED.,,! A&Wkita A6*BUDGET BUDGET PROJECTIPHASE INCREASE .. ......... 77, !DECREASE m �70 Phase 1-Proled Develepment S 40,709 S 49,709 S 49.709 $ 49.709 $ 49,709 $ 49,709 100% Phase 2-Pmllmlnary Des $ 200,024 3 290.024 $ 290,024 $ 209.024 3 - $ 209,024 S 209,024 100% Phase 3-Dealan $ 617,022 $ 1,917.002 $ 1.237,04 $ 3,154,058 $ 1,867.738 $ 1,237,064 $ 3,104,792 S 840,000 27% Phase 4-Ccnshottan S 4.084,103 $ 2.784,103 $ 2,784,103 $ 2,686,444 3 - $ 2,888,444 S 1.200.000 45% Phase 5-Commissicning $ 44,385 $ 44,385 S 44,385 S S #DIV181 Phase 6-Close-Out $ 25,256 $ 25,258 $ 25,258 $ #DFVMI Phase 7-Conflngency $ 350.000 $ 350.000 $ 350,000 $ #DIVICI ,PROJECT TOTAL 1$ 5.440.499 $ 5,440.479 S 1.237,054 $ 6,677.533 3 4.812,915,$ 1.237,054 $ somm 3 -2.298.733 38% Reimbursable Costs 1PROJECT NET 13 5,440,499 1$ 5,440,470 $ 1,237,054 $ 0,877,533[ 4,812,915 3 1,237,0641$ 0,049,989 1$ 2.298,733 PSAICanbad Des PSA (MP) $ 617,022 S 1.830,647 $ s 1.237,054 $ 3,087,601 S 1.830.547 $ 1,237,054 S 3,087.601 $ 708,000 Construcffon Contract(NRG) $ 4.1164,103 $ 2.247.95413 13 2,247,954[-1$ 2.247,054 $ - $ 2,247.954 3 827,000 EDMS:003784878 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Air Quality Improvements Job No J-79 Total Project Budget: $5,440,499 Consultant: Malcolm Pirnie, Inc Start Date of Project: 1/22/2003 Date Amendment Description Cost Accumulated Costs 1/07/2003 Original PSA Emissions Reduction Stud $253,235 $253,235 3/26/2003 1 Provide NOx Pilot Testing $192,829 $446,064 Provide toxic air quality modeling for baseline 9/24/2003 2 conditions and the year 2006 $862,776 $1,308,840 Provide toxic air quality modeling for year 2012 and eight outlying pump stations for year 2006. 9/22/04 3 Conduct combustion technology pilot tests $521,707 $1,830,547 Provide post combustion CGS pilot tests. Provide health risk assessments for Plants 1 & 2 Pendina 4 in the year 2012. $1,237,054 $3,067,601 EDMS: 003784877 P DC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 04/07/2005 04/27/2005 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC05-34 13(i) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin. Director of Engineering Originator: Milind Joshi, Project Manager SUBJECT: SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR MANHOLE REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-21 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Service Agreement with Tran Consulting Engineers for additional design engineering services for Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-21, for an additional amount of $66,087, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,202,784. SUMMARY • This contract is for the rehabilitation of 31 manholes and pipeline point repairs consisting of liner repairs at several locations on the Sunflower Interceptor sewer line starting from McGaw in the City of Irvine and ending near the Santa Ana River channel in the City of Costa Mesa. • A Professional Service Agreement (PSA) was entered into with Tran Consulting Engineers (TCE) to develop a Preliminary Design Report (PDR). • Additional work consisting of flow measurement is necessary to develop a flow diversion plan that will be used during the construction phase. • The fees proposed for additional engineering services were negotiated by TCE and District staff. Staff believes the proposed fee is reasonable for the work requested. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS See attached Professional Services Agreement (PSA) Status Report PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The requested action will increase TCE's PSA authorization from $1,136,697 to S1,202,784 as shown on the attached PSA Status Report. BUDGETIMPACT 0 This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8 — page 34 of Budget) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Page 1 The $66,087 increase to the Tran Consulting Engineer's PSA will come from the contingency budget of $374,500. The overall budget will remain the same. Please see the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION To perform the repair work inside the pipe, it will be necessary to temporarily divert the flows from respective sections in the Sunflower Trunk Sewer to Santa Ana Trunk Sewer and to the College Avenue Pump Station The consultant plans to replicate the actual conditions by installing diversions at various locations and monitoring the flows in the two trunk sewers before developing the sample flow diversion plan. As a part of the diversion study, the consultant will construct and install a diversion structure at one location, develop a traffic control plan, coordinate. monitor, and execute flow measurement, and provide services necessary to ensure that the diversion plan can be safely implemented. This plan will be included with the bid documents for the contractor's use. Originally, this project included the rehabilitation of 28.000 feet of 54- to 84- inch sewer. However, the Phase 1 inspection revealed that the sewer line is in good shape, but that many of the unlined, flattop manholes are corroded. These manholes will be rehabilitated and fitted with conventional cone shaped upper sections to meet District standards. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project has been determined to be exempt from CEQA under Article 19 (Categorical Exemptions), Section 15301 (d) Existing facilities, restoration or rehabilitation of deteriorated or damaged structures. A Notice of Exemption is being filed. ATTACHMENTS 1 . Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. TCE Proposal MJ:ba:lc:jo:lc H \ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\7-21 AR - 040705.doc Page 2 PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 04/07/2005 04/27/2005 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PD(-05-35 13h) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Burror, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: REALIGNMENT AND REHABILITATION OF THE BIG CANYON OFFSITE TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 5-61 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Establish a budget for Realignment and Rehabilitation of the Big Canyon Offsite Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-61 , in the amount of $2,280,000; (2) Approve a reimbursement agreement with the City of Newport Beach for Realignment and Rehabilitation of the Big Canyon Offsite Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-61, in a form approved by General Counsel, for an estimated amount not to exceed $2,000,000; and (3) Authorize the General Manager to execute quitclaim deeds and purchase new easements with the Big Canyon Country Club, in a form approved by General Counsel, to satisfy right-of-way needs for the new sewer alignment. SUMMARY • The Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) Big Canyon sewer traverses through the Big Canyon Country Club (BCCC) Golf Course and connects into the OCSD Backbay Sewer, in the City of Newport Beach (City). • The Big Canyon Trunk currently has a 15-foot wide easement through the golf course that has limited vehicle access due to steep slopes and a pond. This requires OCSD to utilize the BCCC cart paths and the adjacent Home Owners Association's (HOA) private roads. Currently, access is limited to Mondays, when the golf course is closed. • The OCSD 2004-05 Capital Improvement Program Budget includes two projects to address areas where structural failure of the pipeline may occur. These projects have been delayed since 1999 due to BCCC and the adjacent homeowner's association, and the unexpectedly high costs associated with replacing the 40-foot deep sewer. The total project budget for these projects is $2,280,000. • In October 2004, a portion of the budgets from the Big Canyon Offsite Sewer Rehabilitation. Contract No. 5-43-1, and Big Canyon Trunk Sewer Replacement, Contract No.5-43-2, were used to perform urgent repairs where imminent failures were anticipated at a cost of approximately S90,000. However, large sections of the sewer remain to be repaired or replaced. • The City owns and maintains multiple local sewers that connect to OCSD's Big Canyon Trunk. These sewers are currently scheduled for major repairs by the City this fall. H\dept\agendalBOARDA-112005BO-11040511tem 13(1)5-61 doc Revised 06I04l03 Page 1 • BCCC is interested in the City and OCSD pursuing a joint construction project to minimize the overall construction impacts to the Golf Course and coordinate with their planned improvement scheduled this fall. BCCC is offering OCSD a new alignment outside the fairways for better access, a wider access easement (up to 25-feet wide) to allow for large vehicles, and the use of open cut construction methods to reduce OCSD overall construction costs. • Staff recommends the City to take the lead on this project, to allow for the design, construction, and City local connections to occur with BCCC's scheduled improvements this fall. • The proposed reimbursement agreement would contain the following provisions.. ■ OCSD will reimburse the City for costs to design and construct the OCSD sewer improvement project. • OCSD will have the authority to review all plans. inspect construction, and approve all change orders. • BCCC will provide new easements required for the new alignment. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS August 2004 — Rejected bid submitted by rePipe-California, Inc., dba PPR, for Big Canyon Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Contract No. 5-43-1, due to amount exceeding the engineer's estimate. September 2003 — Addendum No. 1 $45,000 with Walden and Associates to extend schedule, increase number of design meetings, prepare manhole access plan, prepare plans for odor control vortex device, design golf cart path improvements for vehicle access. provide grading plans for improved access, incorporate geotechnical data, and provide construction support. June 2002 - Original PSA S24,929 with Walden and Associates pertaining to engineering design for abandonment and replacement of 1115 feet of 12-inch trunk sewer within Big Canyon Country Club. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY OCSD Contract Nos. 5-43-1 and 5-43-2 currently have a total of $2,280,000 remaining from its allocated budget. These funds will be transferred to the new project for the 2005/2006 Fiscal year. Total project costs are not expected to exceed $2,280,000. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 5-43-1 & 5-43-2) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) H 1dep1Wgenda\B0ARDA-1Q005BO-110405\Ilem 13(j)5-61 doc Revised 06/04/03 Page 2 ` A new budget is being created from the two projects remaining funds, Contract Nos. 543-1 and 5-43-2. The newly created budget will allow for a single reimbursement agreement to be administered with the City, in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Big Canyon Offsite Trunk Sewer was constructed in 1968 and is approximately 7,500 feet in length. The sewer line is comprised of 15-inch and 12-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP). The sewer line begins east of MacArthur Boulevard in Newport Beach and extends through Big Canyon Country Club to just west of Jamboree Road. The sewage from the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer flows into the Back Bay Trunk Sewer that runs along Back Bay Drive and eventually reaches the Bay Bridge Pump Station adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway in Newport Beach. Sewage from these lines is treated at OCSD's Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. The original sewer line was constructed at depths between 10 and 20-feet. With the development of the Big Canyon Golf Course in 1971, fill was added to this area that increased the depth of the sewer to over 40-feet in some areas. OCSD conducted a video inspection of the sewer line in December 1999. Several pipe reaches that could not be evaluated based on the 1999 inspection due to sags, were pumped out and re-televised in April 2004. Both inspections revealed defects, including cracks, sags, infiltration, mineral deposits, and offset joints. Maintenance of the sewer in some areas is difficult due to the depth and inaccessibility. OCSD's Strategic Plan adopted in October 1999 calls for replacement/rehabilitation of the sewer line by 2009. OCSD began a study of the sewer in 1999 to determine the condition of the sewer and options for replacement/rehabilitation. ALTERNATIVES 1. Do nothing and risk structural failures that may result in sewage spills. 2. Rehabilitate and Repair existing sewer in its current alignment at increased cost and disruption. CEQA FINDINGS The City will be responsible for CEQA compliance if new impacts are determined to be outside the impacts identified in the previous OCSD Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR), certified in 1999. ATTACHMENTS Budget Information Table JB:AN:sa H:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\Big Canyon Agenda Report to April PDC_v03.doc H:\depl\agenda\BOARDA-1\200590-1\0405\Ifem 13(j).5-61.doc Revised: 06104/03 Page 3 The FAHR minutes of the meeting held April 13, 2005 were not available for this mailing . These minutes will be distributed at the April 27, 2005 Board of Directors meeting . Once the minutes are finalized , they will also be available on the District's website (www.ocsd .com ). FA H R COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 4/13/05 4/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR05-21 14(b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance/Treasurer Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2O05 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 2005. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. Some funds are also deposited in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund for liquidity. The District's Investment Policy. adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the Investment Policy. The portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. As shown on page 2 of the attached PIMCO's Performance Monitoring and Reporting Report for the Long-Term Operating Monies, there is one investment policy compliance exception. It pertains to the holding of one security within PIMCO's Long-Term Operating Monies Portfolio that had an acceptable rating at the time of purchase but has since fallen below the minimum rating allowed by the investment policy. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A- by S&P, with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating, at the time of purchase. The rating exception pertains to the holding of a United Airlines (UAL) Asset Backed Security with a par value of S1.6 million, representing 0.47 percent of the portfolio holdings, whose rating from Moody's has fallen several times, from A3 to BA1, then to BA3, B3, B, and finally to CA. Likewise. the rating from Standard & Poor's has also fallen several times, first from A- to BBB, then to BB, then to B+. B-, and finally to CCC+. Both rating agencies have since withdrawn their ratings. Moody's in February 2004 and Standard & Poor's in June 2004. Although these ratings are less than what is required at the time of purchase, PIMCO believes, based on the financial strength of UAL and the underlying collateral of the security, that the District would suffer an unwarranted loss if the security was sold at this time. The District's investment policy does not require any action because of "credit watch" notices or the decline in credit standing. However, PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit for this security very closely. C\Documents and Settings\Ow-Yeang\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files1OLK7AA\AgendaReport_TREASRPT041305 doc Page 1 Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings. as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust. the District's custodian bank. is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. Also provided is a summary of monthly investment balances and transactions within the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with the District's Investment Policy and previous requirements of California Government Code Section 53646. Government Code Section 53646 mandated that annual investment policies and quarterly reports be rendered to the legislative body. A132853, which was signed on September 29, 2004, amends Government Code Section 53646 to remove the requirements-, the rendering of these documents is optional. Although the Annual Investment Policy and Monthly and/or Quarterly Reports are no longer required, we believe it prudent to continue providing the legislative bodies with these documents. In addition, Government Code Section 53607 has not been repealed that requires an annual delegation of investment authority to the Treasurer and the submission of reports that include investment transactions by month. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The table on the following page details the book balances of the District's investment accounts at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown on the attached bar chart. C IDocuments and SettingslOw-YeanglLocal Settings\Temporary Internet FileslOLK7AAWgendaRepon_TREASRPT041305 doc Page 2 e- d Book Balances Estimated Investment Accounts March 31,2005 Yield(%) State of Calif. LAIF $22,415,638 2.54 Union Bank Checking Account 358,925 2.51 PIMCO—Short-term Portfolio 73,196,814 2.91 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 364,982,831 4.09 Petty Cash 4,000 N/A TOTAL $460 958.208 3.82 Debt Service Reserves w/Trustees $63.639 696 3.67 ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS- 1. Graph of Monthly Investment Balances by Type — Last Six Months 2. Investment Transactions and Balances in the State Local Agency Investment Fund 3. PIMCO Monthly Investment Recap & Yield Analysis Report 4. PIMCO Performance Monitoring Report— Liquid Operating Monies 5. PIMCO Performance Monitoring Report— Long-Term Operating Monies 6. Mellon Trust Asset Summary by Asset Type with Sectors — Liquid Operating Monies 7. Mellon Trust Asset Summary by Asset Type with Sectors — L-T Operating Monies 8. Mellon Trust Yield Analysis Report 9. Mellon Trust Asset Detail — Consolidated 10.Mellon Trust Transaction Detail - Consolidated MW:bg CTocurnents and settingslOw-YeanglLocal Settings%Ternporary Internet FileslOLK7AAlAgendeRepon_TREASRPT041305.doc Page 3 1 O r-- Monthly Investment Balances by Type- Last Six Months $700,000,000 $600,000,000 $500,000,000 $400,000,000 - $300,000,000 $200,000,000 - $100,000,000 $0 October 2004 November December January 2005 February March 2005 2004 2004 2005 OPIMCO- Long-term aPIMCO-Short-term ®COP Debt Reserves 13 LAI F El Bank Accts 0 Petty Cash Orange County Sanitation District Investment Transactions and Balances in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund March 31, 2005 Par Value Book Value Market Value Rate Yield Balance March 1,2005 $5,115,638 $5,115,638 $5,116,638 2.54 2.54 Deposits: 3/11/2005 22,700,000 22,700,000 22,700,000 2.54 2.54 3/22/2005 8,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 2.54 2.54 Total Deposits 30,700,000 30,700,000 30,700,000 2.54 2.54 Withdrawals: 3/2/2005 (2,200,000) (2,200,000) (2,200,000) 2.54 2.64 3/16/2005 (1,600,000) (1,600,000) (1,600,000) 2.54 2.54 3/24/2005 (6,500,000) (6,500,000) (6,500,000) 2.54 2.54 3/30/2006 (3,100,000) (3,100,000) (3,100,000) 2.54 2.54 Total Withdrawels (13,400,000) (13,400,000) (13,400,000) 2.54 2.54 Balance March 31,2005 $22,415,638 $22,415,638 $22,415,638 2.54 2.64 T P T M C 0 April 8,2005 Mr. Mike White, CPA Controller Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708-7018 Dear Mike: The following is a description of events in the bond markets during the month of March in addition to an analysis of the strategies undertaken in the Orange County Sanitation District's Long-Term and Liquid portfolios over the period. Also included is a section on our outlook and preferred strategies to be pursued in your portfolios during the coming months. Bond Market Recap: The Federal Reserve raised the Fed Funds rate 25 basis points to 2.75 percent in March, representing the seventh increase since June 2004. While the Fed reiterated its plan to tighten at a "measured"pace, the inflation language was revised to imply that pricing pressures have increased in recent months. U.S. Treasury yields rose in March on signs of accelerating economic growth and higher inflation. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note finished the month at 4.48 percent, 10 basis points higher than the prior month. Treasuries returned —0.33 percent for the month, while TIPS outperformed their nominal counterparts, with the Lehman Brothers U.S. TIPS Index returning 0.09 percent for the month. Mortgage-backed securities returned —0.19 percent, or 7 basis points less than Treasuries after adjusting for duration. The credit sector, represented by the Lehman Credit Index, returned—1.24 percent, underperforming Treasuries for the month by 86 basis points. March began with a stronger than expected employment report, indicating that the economy created 262,000 new jobs in February, the greatest gain since October of last year. However, the unemployment rate rose to 5.4 percent in February from 5.2 percent in January, due to a higher labor participation rate, which is generally perceived as a sign of labor market strength. The Fed's preferred inflation measure, the price index for personal consumption expenditures (PCE) excluding food and energy, gained 1.6 percent in February from a year earlier. Last month, the Fed forecasted that the PCE deflator would rise 1.5 to 2.0 percent this year. Finally, the Bureau of Economic Analysis left the fourth quarter GDP growth number unchanged at 3.8 percent. r A& Mike 147hite, CPA April 8, 2005 Orange County Sanitation District Page 2 Treasury yield changes during the month of March are summarized as follows: ■ 3-month bills: +2 basis points to 2.77% • 6-month bills: +15 basis points to 3.12% ■ 2-year notes: +18 basis points to 3.78% ■ 5-year notes: +15 basis points to 4.17% ■ 10-year notes: +11 basis points to 4.48% ■ 30-year notes: +4 basis points to 4.76% Perf ormance Attribution: Long-Term Portfolio The Long-Term portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District returned -0.06% on a total return basis for the month of March, outperforming the Merrill Lynch 1-5 year Government Corporate Index by 14 basis points. The following points summarize returns for the month ended March 31: • The Long-Term portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 14 basis points for the month. • For the twelve-month period,the Long-Term portfolio returned 0.47%, outperforming the benchmark by 100 basis points. • Portfolio duration, below the index, was positive for monthly performance as interest rates increased across the yield curve. • Yield curve positioning similar to that of the index was neutral for performance. • An underweight exposure to corporates was positive for performance, as corporates underperformed Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis. • Exposure to mortgage-backed securities was slightly negative for performance as the sector lagged Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis. • Substituting Treasury Inflation Protected Securities for nominal Treasuries was positive for performance as TIPS outperformed their nominal counterparts during the month. Liquid Portfolio The Liquid portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District generated a total return of 0.23% during the month of March, performing in line with the 3-month Treasury Bill Index. The following points summarize returns for the period ending March 31: • The Liquid portfolio performed in line with the benchmark for the month. • For the twelve-month period, the Liquid portfolio returned 1.68%, outperforming the benchmark by 10 basis points. • Use of higher yielding securities such as commercial paper and short-term notes contributed to performance. Y :Llr. Mike White, CPA April8,2005 Orange County Sanitation District Page 3 Outlook and Stra=y: The global economy will be stable through the balance of 2005, led by modestly above-trend U.S. growth. In the U.S., the handoff from stimulative fiscal and monetary policy to a revived corporate sector has occurred. Another critical element of cyclical stability will be continued funding of the U.S. trade deficit by Asian central banks, though trade and financial imbalances threaten to erode this mutually beneficial arrangement over the long run. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury will range between 4.25 and 4.75 percent with the risk of a 25 basis point breakout on the high side. Important aspects of our outlook include: ■ U.S. Housing Risk Mitigated — The ability to monetize housing wealth via mortgage refinancing has helped sustain U.S. consumption. While rich valuations and the potential for higher mortgage rates will temper future housing price gains, a crash is unlikely. Affordability should hold up so long as incomes remain stable. Only a small percentage of mortgages are subject to upward rate adjustments in the near term. • U.S. Inflation Pressures Build—While inflation is well contained in much of the world,the recent trend upward in U.S. inflation will be sustained. Inflation pressureis emerging in producer prices and durable goods, suggesting that Corporate America is regaining pricing power. A weak dollar, higher commodity prices and rising unit labor costs will add to the pressure. • Europe and Japan To Grow More Slowly Than U.S.—In Europe and Japan,the corporate sector is showing signs of strength. Companies have de-levered balance sheets and boosted profits via cost cutting and layoffs. While such restructuring bodes well over a secular time frame, real wages and consumption have not yet recovered in either of these economies. Their contribution to global growth will therefore be modest. ■ Emerging Markets Supply Savings—These economies are now an important buffer for the global economy thanks to their stronger financial profiles and trade surpluses. Along with China and slow-growing Europe and Japan, emerging market countries will contribute to a global glut of savings outside the U.S. that will help keep real interest rates low. • Potential Shocks To Stability — Some catalysts that could disrupt global economic stability include: 1) a pullback of U.S. consumption in response to a Fed policy mistake; 2) upside inflation surprises; 3) unexpected currency revaluations or reduction of U.S. dollar reserves by Asian central banks; 4) oil/commodity price shocks; 5) collapse of a leveraged investor or institution; 6) geopolitical turmoil;and 7)trade protectionism. To the extent that guidelines allow, PIMCO will employ a diverse range of strategies to enhance portfolio yield while still protecting investors' capital if macroeconomic stability unravels. Key strategies will include: ■ Duration and Yield Curve—We will look to add value and control risk via tactical flexibility. The duration target will be about neutral to the index when rates are near the top of our forecast range, but we will shorten it to about 0.50 year below the index when rates approach the bottom of our range. We will maintain an overall curve position close to that of the benchmark. Mr. Mike White, CPA April8, 2005 Orange County Sanitation District Page 4 ■ Selectively Trim Underweight Of Core U.S. Sectors-Rich valuations in core bond sectors such as mortgages and corporates dictate caution in employing these bonds to enhance yield. In the mortgage sector, PIMCO will add value via coupon and security selection, and cautiously look for opportunities to add exposure to boost income. Similar opportunities may also be available in the corporate market,though any reduction in our corporate underweight will likely be smaller. ■ TIPS as an Out-of-Index Alternative-Better risk/reward trade-offs can be found outside of core sectors. Real return bonds should benefit from relatively low and stable real yields, as well as larger inflation adjustments over the next several months. They are also less volatile than nominal bonds in a rising rate environment. We look forward to discussing these and other topics with you in the near future. Best regards, . -,--.,,'V K YY�,CR,, Christine Telish,CFA John M.Miller, CFA Vice President Senior Vice President i Mr. Mike White, CPA April 8,2005 Orange County Sanitation District Page 8 Orange County Sanitation District for the month ending March 31,2005 Total Return Account-203 With Accrued Interest Without Ac--v-ued Int rest Market Value 336,983,984 335,000,362 Book Value 337,545,453 335,661,931 Yield to Maturity 4.09 4.11 Short Term Account-603 With Accrued Interest 3yjtb9ut Accrued lute est Market Value 73,541,070 73.3404675 Book Value 73,520,261 7.3,31.9,866 Yield to Maturity 2.91 2.92 MUN'1'HLY 14EPUK'1' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1NVES7WNT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING (for the month ended 31 March 2005) Page 1 of I Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • $73,541,070 PiMCO • Mellon $73,522,113 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $73,520,261 • Mellon $73,621,242 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.12 Of index: 0.20 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact(gain/loss)of 1%Change: $88 249 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 00/0 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 79% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 00/0 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.23 0.21 3 Months: 0.62 0.57 12 Months: 1.68 1.58 Fiscal Year-to-Date: 1.41 1.34 Commentary • The Liquid portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 2 basis points for the month,and by 7 basis points fiscal year-to-date. • PIMCO's emphasis on higher yielding securities such as commercial paper and short-term notes contributed to performance. Q%Do=meob wW SettftWekramU aW SettlalTemparmy internee POesW LKM UQM0-03-03 R AI= MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING & REPORTING (for the month ended 31 March 2005) Page 1 of 2 Long-Term Operating Monies(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $336,883,884 • Mellon $336,887,906 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $337,545,453 • Mellon $339,729,318 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 1.96 Of Index: 2.44 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact in/loss of 1%Change: $6 602 924 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 00/0 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 4% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Average Portfolio Credit Quality: AAA 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": (r 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance!' No' 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio index Period: 1 Month: -0.06 -0.20 3 Months: -0.30 -0.64 12 Months: 0.47 -0.53 Fiscal Year-to-Date: 1.58 1.20 • The Long-Term portfolio outperformed the benchmark by 14 basis points for the month,and outperformed the benchmark by 38 basis points fiscal year-to-date. ■ Portfolio duration,below the index,was positive for monthly performance as interest rates increased across the yield curve. • Yield curve positioning similar to that of the index was neutral for performance. • An underweight exposure to corporates was positive for performance,as corporates underperformed Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis. • Exposure to mortgage-backed securities was slightly negative for performance as the sector lagged Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis. is Substituting Treasury Inflation Protected Securities for nominal Treasuries was positive for performance as TIPS outperformed their nominal counterparts during the month. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING&REPORTING (for the month ended 31 March 2005) Page 2 of 2 *Compliance Issues: $1,600,000 par of United Airlines(UAL)Pass-Through 2001-1-C(Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificate(EETC)-909317BC2),6.831%coupon, 3/01/2010 maturity,representing 0.47%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis was purchased on 8/10/2001;and subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A3 to BA 1 (on 9/18/2001)and S&P from A-to BBB(on 9/20/2001). The security was further downgraded by Moody's from BAl to BA3 (on 12/21/2001)and by S&P from BBB to BB(on 6/28/02). Following news of the possible bankruptcy filing,the security was further downgraded in August (B3 Moody's,B+by S&P). On November 29,2002,S&P further downgraded this issue to B,and shortly thereafter on December 9,2002,downgraded the issue one notch further to B-. On August 7,2003,S&P downgraded the issue to CCC+,while Moody's followed suit on August 28,2003 with a downgrade to CA. Both rating agencies have since withdrawn their ratings(Moody's withdrew in February 2004 and S&P withdrew in June 2004). The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split. On March 24,UAL reported an operating loss for February of$179 million and a net loss of$291 million,which included$92 million of mostly non-cash reorganization expenses. "Recent fare increases have been modestly encouraging,but the industry still has a long way to go in raising fares and reducing capacity to offset burgeoning fuel costs,"said UAL's CFO.The airline,which has been under Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection since December 2002,ended February with a cash balance of$2.2 billion,up$183 million during the month on strong bookings. PIMCO continues to negotiate with United on our holdings and currently leads an ad hoc committee. This has been an extremely complicated effort due to the complex nature of United's bankruptcy. These negotiations have required PIMCO's analysts access to non-public information and therefore sharing them results in parties becoming restricted. In light of this extremely complicated bankruptcy,PIMCO continues to strive to act in the most prudent manner to obtain maximum recovery. 521it Rated Securities Still In ConhHance: The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB in the event of a split rating. -$1,000,000 par of Ford Motor Credit securities(cusip 345397GV9 maturing 5115105),representing 0.30%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis(exposure was reduced in July 2004 as$2.5 million par matured). The securities were downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+,then to BBB on 10/25/02,and then to BBB-on 11/13/03. Moody's downgraded the securities on 1/16/02 from A2 to A3. -$1,750,000 par of Virginia Electric Power NTT securities(cusip 927804EN0),maturing on March 31,2006,represents 0.52%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The security was downgraded on 10/21/2002 by S&P from A-to BBB+,but continues to carry a Moody's rating of A3. G IDocuments and Settln0c ranALowl SawnoTemporary Internet FlhwiOLUAL-T6800-05-03 RPT.dw __..._.....,.. .,.,..__ ......... .... ........_.__._._._..._....._._.....__......... ..............._...___ __._.._....._.__.. ................................. ... .... ........................_....._•__.___._____.__._....,. .. ... .............., ..._............_....._ Report ID:OL8251 Asset Summary Base Currency:USD by Asset Type with Sectors Alternate Baas Curreney: Ebtabange Rate: LFQUID OPER PZVCo-OCSF07511102 3/31/2005 Status:FINAL Net Unrealized Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Shares Far Base Base Total Base CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR INTEREST 325,299.50 325,299.50 0.44% 0.00 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT-DOMESTIC 1,600,000.000 1,600,000.00 1,600,000.00 2.18a/a 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN 1YR 5,000,000.000 4,970,738.83 4,970,738.83 6.76% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS THAN 1 12,087,000.000 11,993,285.35 11,993,285.35 16.31% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES- LESS THAN IYR 14,100,000.000 14,002,237.66 14,002,237.66 19.04% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 941,252.740 941,252.74 941,252.74 1.28% 0.00 OTHER U.S. GOUT OBLIGATIONS 2,000,000.000 1,986,748.89 1,986,748.89 2.70% 0.00 REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS 8,000,000.000 8,000,000.00 8,000,000.00 10.88a/a 0.00 TREASURY BILLS-LESS THAN IYR 23,100,000.000 22,882,652.76 22,882,652.76 31.12a/a 0.00 U.S.DOLLAR 66,828,252.740 66,702,215.73 66,702,215.73 90.72% 0.00 CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 66,828,252.740 66,702,215.73 66,702,215.73 90.72% 0.00 FIRED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR BANKING&FINANCE 6,800,000.000 6,919,026.70 6,819,897.50 9.28% -99,129.20 TOTAL ASSETS-BASE: 73,628,252.740 73,621,242.43 73,522,113.23 100.00% -99,129.20 1 Workbench ......................................................_..... ..,.........,..............,... ...... _....................... ...... ._.. ....... .. ........... .. ....... ................ .... .................._...........___...................... _.....,............-........................._.................. _ _._...._............_.1tr..........._._ Asset Summary Report ID:GL8251 ry Base Currency-USD by Asset Type with Sectors Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: LOBO TJUM opBR-PIMCO-OCSFO75222M 3/31/2005 _Status:FW/1L _ Net Unrealized Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Shares Par Base Base Total Base CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S.DOLLAR CASH 10,390.63 10,390.63 0,aW/O 0.00 PENDING TRADES -15,056,273.14 -15,056,273.14 -4.470/O 0.00 INTEREST 1,894,684.52 1,894,684.52 0.560/O 0.00 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT- DOMESTIC 10,000,000.000 9,995,500.00 9,995,500.00 2.970/O 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,035,758.470 1,035,758.47 1,035,758.47 0.310/O 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR 11,035,758.470 -2,119.939.52 -2,119,939.52 -0.63% 0.00 CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 11,035,758.470 -2,119,939.52 -2,119,939.52 -0.63% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR ABS-AIRPLANE RECEIVABLES 1,600,000.000 1,600,000.00 203,152.00 0.06%. -1,396,848.00 ABS-HOME EQUITY 544,154.260 544,154.26 545,024.91 0.160/O 870.65 BANIONG&FINANCE 23,400,000.000 23,334,519.50 23,335,399.00 6.93% 879.50 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATION 1,782,321.970 1,782,321.97 1,872,061.88 0.560/O 89,739.91 FHLMC MULTICLASS 773,028.640 773,852.17 767,393.26 0.230/O -6,458.91 FHLMC POOLS 52,774.710 51,488.32 54,622.88 0.02% 3,134.56 FNMA POOLS 59,100,569.820 59,840,956.28 59,141,090.86 17.56% -699,865.42 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 3,308,866.450 3,297,824.93 3,305,718.81 0.980/0 7,893.88 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 535,371.220 561,320.99 559,566.47 0.17% -1,754.52 INDUSTRIAL 2,000,000.000 1,998,188.00 1,999,360.00 0.590/O 1,172.00 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 35,506,290.000 35,523,139.00 38,176,467.41 11.33% 2,653,328.41 INSURANCE 1,600,000.000 1,594,032.00 1,605,488.00 0.480/O 11,456.00 PVT PLACEMENTS-MORE THN IYR 752,000.000 826,199.84 826,199.84 0.250/O 0.00 U.S.AGENCIES 15,846,013.750 15,784,429.22 15,808,800.86 4.690/O 24,371.64 U.S. GOVERNMENTS 190,174,342.070 192,592,991.26 189,028,257.07 56.110/O -3,564,734.19 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 1,750,000.000 1,743,840.00 1,779,242.50 0.53% 35,402.50 U.S.DOLLAR 338,725,732.890 341,849,257.74 339,007,845.75 100.63% -2.841,411.99 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 339,725,732.890 341,849,257.74 339,007,945.75 100.63% -2,841,411.99 1 Workbench .......... _. _.__................-. .... - -- --- ------ Report ID:CL8251 Asset Summary Base Currency:USD by Asset Type with Sectors Aiterrate Base Currer° llmbame Rate: ZAMD TERM OPER MUCO-OCOM762aao2 3/31/200$___ atatm-FMAL --------._ Net Unrealized Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Shares par Base Base Total Base TOTAL AMMM-BASE 349.761.491.360 339,729,318.22 336,887,906.23 100.00% -2,841,411.99 2 Workbench Asset Detail Report M: GL8013 Base Currency: USD @ Mellon by Currency Alternate Base Currency: OCSDLCONSOLXLkATED-OCSGOGO 10000 3/31/2005 Exchange Rate: Status: FINAL Rd U.S.DOLLAR CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS INTEREST RECEIVABLE 2,219,984.02 2,219,984.02 0.54% 0.00 CASH 10,390.63 10,390.63 0,000/0 0.00 RECEIVABLE FOR INVESTMENTS 12,999,071.63 12,999,071.63 3.17% 0.00 SOLD PAYABLE FOR INVESTMENTS -28,055,344.77 -28,055,344.77 -6.84% 0.00 PURCHASED FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS 99.3519 3,000,000.000 2,980,556.33 2,980,556.33 0.730/6 0.00 SYSTEM MAT 04/27/2005 SEC ID:313385EW2 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS DISC 99.5091 2,000,000.000 1,990,182.50 1,990,182.50 0.48% 0.00 MAT 05/20/2005 SEC ID: 313385fV3 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 99.1200 2,500,000.000 2,478,000.00 2,478,000.00 0.60% 0.00 MAT 04/05/2005 SEC ID:313397DY4 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 99.3559 2,000,000.000 1,987,117.78 1,987,117.78 0.48% 0.00 MAT 05/10/2005 SEC ID:313397FK2 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 99.3374 2,000,000.000 1,986,748.89 1,986,748.89 0.48% 0.00 MAT 05/17/2005 SEC ID: 313397FS5 FEDERAL 140ME LN MTG CORP DISC 99.2922 1,587,000.000 1,575,767.57 1,575,767.57 0.38% 0.00 MAT 05/31/2005 SEC ID: 313397GG0 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 99.3233 2,000,000.000 1,986,466.67 1,986,466.67 0.48% 0.00 MAT 06/14/2005 SEC ID:313397GWS FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 99.1483 4,000,000.000 3,965,933.33 3,965,933.33 0.97% 0.00 MAT 06/30/2005 SEC ID:313397HN4 FEDERAL NATI,MTG ASSN DISC NTS 99.3499 10,700,000.000 10,630,444.17 10,630,444.17 2.59% 0.00 MAT 004/27/2005 SEC ID: 313589EW9 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 99.3439 1,400,000.000 1,390,814.04 1,390,814.04 0.34% 0.00 MAT 05/11/2005 SEC ID: 313589FL2 41812005 9.-37.57AM PDT 1 Workbench Asset Detail Report ED: GL8013 Base Currency: USD Mellon by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD-CONSOLJDATED-OCSGOOO 10000 3/31/2005 Status: FINAL zN FEDERAL NATI,MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 99.2518 1,000,000.000 992,517.78 992,517.78 0.24% 0.00 MAT 06/29/2005 SEC ID:313589HM8 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 98.8462 1,000,000.000 988,461.67 988,461.67 0.24% 0.00 08/01/2005 SEC ID: 313589JW4 UB-S AG STAMFORD BRH INSTL C/D 99.9550 10,000,000.000 9.995,500.00 9.995,500.00 2.44% 0.00 VAR RT 07/05/2005 DD 07/02/04 SEC ID:9026IGE47 U S TREASURY BILL 99.7958 3,800,000.000 3,792,241.67 3,792,241.67 0.92% 0.00 DUE 04/14/2005 DD 10/14/2004 SEC ID:912795SJ I U S TREASURY BILL 98.9593 9,000,000.000 8,906,337.09 8,906,337.09 2.17% 0.00 DUE 04/28/2005 DD 10/28/04 SEC ID:912795SL6 U S TREASURY BILL 98.8200 3,300,000.000 3,261,060.00 3,261,060.00 0.79% 0.00 0.000%06/09/2005 DD 12/09/04 SEC ID:912795SSI U S TREASURY BILL 98.9002 7,000,000.000 6,923,014.00 6,923,014,00 1.69% 0.00 DUE 07/21/2005 DD 01/20/2005 SEC ID: 912795vi-i I WELLS FARGO BANK NA INSTL C/D 100.0000 1,600,000.000 1,600,000.00 1,600,000.00 0.39% 0.00 2.790%04/13/2005 DD 03/31/05 SEC ID:9497p2FT9 LEHMAN CAT I REPO REPO 100.0000 8.000,000.000 8,000,000.00 8,000.000.00 1.95% 0.00 02.630%04/01/2005 DD 03/31/05 SEC ID: 99433L698 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 100.0000 1,977,011.210 1,977,011.21 1,977,011.21 0.48% 0.00 SEC ID: 996085247 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 77,864,011.210 64,582,276.21 64,582,276.21 15.740/6 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES AIG SUNAMERICA GLOBAL REG S 109.8670 752,000.000 826,199.84 826.199.84 0.20% 0.00 5.850%08/01/2008 DD 08/08/01 SEC ID: U00907AAO COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 99.9100 5.400,000.000 5,400,000.00 5,395,140.00 1.31% -4,860.00 5-000%04/01/2020 DD 04/01/05 SEC ID:01FOS0445 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 99.6900 3,000,000.000 2,996,718.75 2,990,700.00 0.73% -6,018.75 5.000%05/01/2020 DD 05/01/05 SEC ID:01 F050452 41812005 9.37:57AM PDT 2 Workbench Asset Detail Report m: GL6013 Base Currency: USD Mellon by Currency Alternate Basee Curnge Rate: OCSD COIVSOLiOATED-OC8G00010000 3/31/2005 Status: FINAL �ny} jf+ :1 ,s. 4. {t ,ti L.ijt Of l� r �_, i , tifilr.et + 3 { , 1 t S ff.f i:,rj 4} �'.�' ..ea)4:)t t , ��l F � F .•f.Price , } t, f: � ,; f. � � 1.#,. ,..>< t .� _ ., :�< '.Loss:. ,z ,.:, ► . u.: t...; N , ..t,.c ��. t -Y j=,F„ s,..' ! e -Plat f'. 4 Y. ! t,i FY (g^,['i•°,l��rcrl . 6>i� ,. },:.,. s �, •:,�. � .$ha � Par•....:............:. ..,, base ... ,.r=.,,:�>�sc. .�. � ..,B�d�c= COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 100.1300 4,000,000.000 4,003,828.12 4,005,200.00 0.98% 1,371.88 5.5000/6 04/01/2035 DD 04/01/05 SEC ID:01F052649 ALLSTATE CORP SR NT 100.3430 1,600,000.000 1,594,032.00 1,605,488.00 0.39% 11,456.00 7.875%05/01/2005 DD 05/01/00 SEC ID:020002AT-5 ASSOCIATES CORP NORTH AMER SR 100.6250 3,000,000.000 3,112,350.00 3,018,750.00 0.74% -93,600.00 6,625%06/15/2005 DD 06/09/95 SEC ID:046003FFI BANK AMER N A TRANCHE#TR00255 100.0000 3,500,000.000 3,499,940.20 3,500,000.00 0.85% 59.80 VAR RT 08/08/2005 DD 02/07/05 SEC ID:06050VLQ8 BANKAMERICA CORP MTN SR 00150 100.4060 150,000.000 153,652.50 150,609.00 0.04% -3,043.50 7.125%05/12/2005 DD 05/12/95 SEC ID:06605LGFO CIT GROUP INC NEW SR NT 100.4370 1,500,000.000 1,507,005.00 1,506,555.00 0.37% -450.00 VAR RT 09/22/2006 DD 09/23/03 SEC Ill: 125581AF5 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 0000-11150 100.7953 933,710.480 913,431.45 941,135.81 0.23% 27.704.36 7.500% 12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99 SEC ID:302998GE3 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP MTN 97.3700 10,000,000.000 9,993,100.00 9,737,000.00 2.37% -256,100.00 4.0000%09/22/2009 DD 09/22/04 SEC ID:3128X3WY5 FI'ILMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 A 99.2710 773,028.640 773,852.17 767,393.26 0.19% -6,458.91 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/97 SEC ID:3133TCE95 FI-ILMC GROUP#78-6064 103.5020 52,774.710 51,488.32 54,622.88 0.01% 3,134.56 6.384%01/01/2028 DD 12/01/97 SEC ID:31348SWZ3 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 108.6250 2,100,000.000 2,030,133.00 2,281,125.00 0.56% 250,992.00 6.625%09/15/2009 DD 09/01/99 SEC ID:31359MEY5 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 101.4250 2,350,000.000 2,385,461.50 2,383,487.50 0.58% -1,974.00 5.250%06/15/2006 DD 06/22/01 SEC ID: 31359MJX2 FNMA POOL#0254510 100.1780 623,968.650 642,687.70 625,079.31 0.15% -17,608.39 5.000% 11/01/2017 DD 10/01/02 SEC ID:31371KVB4 FNMA POOL#0254631 100.1580 134,087.950 138,110.59 134,299.81 0.03% -3,810.78 5.000%02/01/2018 DD 01/01/03 SEC ID: 31371 KY47 41812005 9 37:57AM PDT 3 Workbench Asset Detail Report M: GL8013 Base Currency: USD Mellon by Currency Alternate Base Currency: @ Exchange Rate: OCSIaCONSOUZZATED-OCSGOOO 10000 3/31/2005 Status: FINAL Z"N I% �,'f i • FNMA POOL#0254760 100.1310 120,356.760 123,967.45 120,514.43 0.03% -3,453.02 5.000%06/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 SEC ID:3137 1 K5V9 FNMA POOL#0254866 100.1100 54,648.800 56,288.27 54,708.91 0.01% -1,579.36 5.000%09/01/2018 DD 08/01/03 SEC ID: 3137ILCB3 FNMA POOL#0254953 100.0970 289,613.330 293,324.01 289,894.25 0.07% -3,429.76 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 10/0 1/03 SEC ID:3137 1 LE21 FNMA POOL#0254987 100.1025 783,139.750 793,173.73 783,942.69 0.19% -9,231.04 5.000% 12/01/2018 DD 11/0 1/03 SEC ID:3137 1 LF46 FNMA POOL#0323980 103.3730 133,456.980 139,337.42 137,958.48 0.03% -1,378.94 6.000%04/01/2014 DD 09/01/99 SEC ID:313741'2MO FNMA POOL#0357328 100.1638 22,605.050 23,283.20 22,642.07 0.01% -641.13 5.000%01/0 1/2018 DD 01/0 1/03 SEC ID: 31376J4M8 FNMA POOL#0357430 100.1310 1,199,375.030 1,212,868.00 1,200,946.21 0,29% -11,921.79 5.000%09/01/2018 DD 09/01/03 SEC ID: 31376KA71 FNMA POOL#0456482 103.3760 36,506.480 38,115.03 37,738.94 0.01% -376.09 6.000%02/01/2014 DD 02/01/99 SEC ID:31381CCT2 FNMA POOL 40509649 103.3600 97,201.980 101,484.94 100,467.97 0.02% -1,016.97 6.000-/.09/01/2014 DD 09/01/99 SEC ID:31383QEWO FNMA POOL#0535451 103.3650 103,887.500 108,465.04 107,383.31 0.03% -1,081.73 6.000%06/01/2015 DD 07/01/00 SEC ID:31384VZQ8 FNMA POOL#0555363 100.1510 287,340.570 295,960.77 287,774.45 0.07% -8,186.32 5.000%04/01/2018 DD 03/01/03 SEC ID: 31385W5YI FNMA POOL#0555453 100.1440 29,870.710 36,253.43 29,913.72 0.01% -339.71 5.000%05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03 SEC ID:31385X]3W6 FNMA POOL#0555545 100.1440 239,163.540 246,338.45 239,507.94 0.06% -6,830.51 5.000%06/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 SEC ID:31385XES2 FNMA POOL#0555621 100.1025 824,410.520 833,685.14 825,255.77 0.20% -8,429.37 5.000%07/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 SEC ID: 31385XG68 41812005 9.37.57AM PDT 4 Work-bench Report ID: GL8013 Asset Detail Base Currency: USD Mellon by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD CONSOLIDATED-OCSGOOO 10000 3/31/2005 Status: FINAL 1 •� i tt'r .�. { r �✓ PACE �i' i r ►$t t. key il1 ue �Il Ea i f(.( it.d>L /h•o$4 Delscri tion Shares :lase FNMA POOL##0681309 100.1580 448,975.110 462,444.36 449,684.49 0,11% -12,759.87 5.0000%02/01/2018 DD 02/01/03 SEC ID: 31391Y3S4 FNMA POOL!#0681334 100.1580 53,933.580 55,551.59 54,018.80 0.01% -1,532.79 5.000%02/01/2018 DD 01/01/03 SEC ID: 31391Y4TI FNMA POOL,i#0684908 100.1310 294,251.630 298,021.75 294,637.10 0.07% -3,384.65 5.000%.06/01/2018 DD 05101/03 SEC ID: 31400D3RI FNMA POOL##0685200 100.1440 161,003.960 163,066.85 161,235.81 0.04% -1,831.04 5.000%03/01/2018 DD 03/01/03 SEC ID:31400EGH7 FNMA POOL#0685665 100.1580 27,378.040 28,199.38 27,421.30 0.01% -778.08 5.000%02/01/2018 DD 02/01/03 SEC ID:31400EW22 FNMA POOL#0686318 100,1510 243,376.640 250,677.93 243,744.14 0.06% -6,933.79 5.000110 03/01/2018 DD 03/01/03 SEC ID:31400FPB7 FNMA POOL#0688739 100.1310 91,690.390 94,441.10 91,810.50 0,02% -2,630.60 5.000%06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 SEC ID: 31400JEL9 FNMA POOL#0689859 100.1310 82,235.010 83,288.65 82,342.74 0.02% -945.91 5.000%05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 SEC ID: 31400KMG8 FNMA POOL#i0693834 100.1510 519,982.390 535,581.85 520,767.56 0.13% -14,814.29 5.000%03/01/2018 DD 03/01/03 SEC ID:3140OPY74 FNMA POOI.#0695852 100.1370 189,125.120 194,798.87 189,384.22 0.05% -5,414.65 5.000%05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 SEC ID:31400SBVO FNMA POOL#0695889 100.1370 648,202.050 667,648.12 649,090.09 0,16% -18,558.03 5.000%05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 SEC ID: 31400SC23 FNMA POOL#f0697026 100.1370 19,724.090 20,315.83 19,751.11 0.00% -564.72 5.000%05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03 SEC ID: 31400TLF2 FNMA POOL#0702210 100.1025 200,728.840 206,750.70 200,934.64 0.05% -5,816.06 5.000%05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03 SEC ID: 31401ADP9 FNMA POOL#0702328 100.1370 115,453.400 116,932.64 115,611.57 0.03% -1,321.07 5.000%05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03 SEC ID:31401AHD2 41812005 9:37:57AM PDT 5 Workbench Asset Detail Report ID: GL8013 Base Mellon Cency:by Currency Alternate Base CurCurrency: USD e te: OCSD-CONSOUDATED-OiCSGOOO 10000 3/31/2005 ExchangStatRaus: FINAL 7777777777 Pd ce Descry OR P P otal . base:: FNMA POOL#0709148 100.1240 246,918.590 254,326.16 247,224.77 0.06% -7,101.39 5.000%06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 SEC 11): 3140111ZM7 FNMA POOL#0709360 100.1240 540.393.880 547,317.68 541,063.97 0.13% -6,253.71 5.000%07/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 SEC ID: 3140IJB56 FNMA POOL#0709826 100.1310 95,705.500 96,931.72 95,830.87 0.0 2 0/6 -1,100.85 5.000%06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 SEC ID: 31401JSP4 FNMA POOL#0709917 100.1310 198,221.810 200,761.52 198,481.48 0.05% -2,280.04 5.000%06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 SEC ID:31401JVJ4 FNMA POOL#0709963 100.1025 17,738.160 17,965.44 17,756.35 0.00% -209.09 5.000%06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 SEC ID: 31401JWYO FNMA POOL#0710235 100.1240 510,144.730 525,449.09 510,777.31 0.12% -14,671.78 5.000%06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 SEC ID:31401KBCB FNMA POOL#0713344 100.1310 13,156.570 13,551.26 13,173.81 0.00% -377.45 5,000%06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 SEC ID:31401 NP52 FNMA POOL 410713365 100.1240 221,823.940 224,666.05 222,099.00 0.05% -2,567.05 5.000%07/01/2018 DD 07/01/03 SEC ID:31401 NQS I FNMA POOL#0720319 100.1240 627,230.670 635,267.07 628,008.44 0.15% -7,258.63 5.000%07/01/2018 DD 07/01/03 SEC ID:31401WG45 FNMA POOL#0720369 100.1025 1,924,542.540 1,982,278.82 1,926,515.73 0.47% -55,763.09 5.000%06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 SEC ID:31401WJNO FNMA POOL#0721629 100.1240 266,978.170 274,987.53 267,309.22 0.07% -.7,678.31 5.000%07/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 SEC ID:31401XVW4 FNMA POOL#0723487 100.1240 187,956.350 190.070.87 188,189.42 0.05% -1,881.45 5.000%06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 SEC ID: 31402AXQ4 FNMA POOL#0725530 99.9802 3,057,543.620 3,099,107.09 3,056,938.93 0.74% -42,168.16 5.000%06/01/2019 DD 05/01/04 SEC ID: 31402DA75 FNMA POOL 40729601 100.1170 361,647.730 366,281.35 362,070.86 0.09% -4,210.49 5.000%07/01/2018 DD 07/01/03 SEC ID: 31402HRW3 41812005 9:3 7.-5 7A M PDT 6 Workbench Asset Detail Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency:@ Mellon by Currency Alternate Base Currency: USD Exchange Rate* OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSG400010000 3f31/2005 Status: FINAL jj FNMA POOL#0732873 100.0970 32,074.950 32,485.89 32,106.06 0.01% -379.83 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 10/01/03 SEC ID:31402MFNS FNMA POOL#0737130 100.1100 571,535.510 578,858.31 572,164.20 0.14% -6,694.11 5.000% 10/01/2018 DD 10/0 1/03 SEC 11):31402S4P9 FNMA POOL#0738211 100.1025 478,755.630 484,889.71 479,246.49 0.12% -5,643.22 5.000% 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03 SEC ID: 31402UDQ2 FNMA POOL#0738487 100,0970 166,945.530 169,084.52 167,107.47 0.04% -1,977.05 5.000% 10/01/2018 DD 10/0 1/03 SEC ID: 31402UNC2 FNMA POOL#0740457 100.1025 1,978,332.520 2,005,225.48 1,980,360.86 0.48% -24,864.62 5.000% 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03 SEC ID:31402WI'N8 FNMA POOL#0740471 100.1025 656,429.540 664,840.03 657,102.56 0.16% -7,737.47 5.000% 10/01/2018 DD 10/0 1/03 SEC ID: 31402WT40 FNMA POOL 40740748 100.1100 698,655.800 707.607.32 699,424.32 0.17% -8,183.00 5.000% 10/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 SEC ID: 31402W51-17 FNMA POOL#0743868 100.1025 33,484.570 33,913.59 33,518.90 0.01% -394.69 5.000%. 11/01/2018 DD 10/01/03 SEC ID: 31403BMR1 FNMA POOL#0744008 100.1310 907,255.300 918,879.51 908,443,80 0.22% -10,435.71 5.000%07/01/2018 DD 09/01/03 SEC ID:31403BR54 FNMA POOL#0744316 100.1025 141,148.370 142,956.84 141,293.09 0.03% -1,663.75 5.000%09/01/2018 DD 09/01/03 SEC ID: 31403B3Z4 FNMA POOL#0747914 100.0970 290,752.080 294,477.35 291,034.11 0.07% -3,443.24 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 SEC ID:31403F3X0 FNMA POOL#0748400 100.1025 176,314.000 178,573.03 176,494.77 0.04% -2,078.26 5.000%08/01/2018 DD 09/01/03 SEC ID:31403GNR9 FNMA POOL#0748899 100.1025 860,149.720 871,170.39 861,031.61 0.21% -10,138.78 5.000% 12/01/2018DD 11/01/03 SEC ID:31403G71,0 FNMA POOL#0750377 100.1025 1,907,568.790 1,932,009.51 1,909,524.58 0.47% -22,484.93 5.000% 11/01/2018DD 11/01/03 SEC ID: 31403JUA2 41812005 9:37:57AM PDT 7 Work-bench Asset Detail Report W: OL8013 Base Currency: USD @ Mellon by Currency Alternate Base Currency: e : OCSD-COASOUDATED-OCSGOOO 10000 3/31/2005 ExchangStatuRatse: FINAL t: 01 FNMA POOL#0750380 100.1025 1,659,587.840 1,680,851.33 1,661,289.38 0.40% -19,561.95 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 SEC ID:31403JUD6 FNMA POOL#0750445 100.1025 163,927.980 166,028.31 164,096.05 0.04% -1,932.26 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 SEC ID: 31403JWE2 FNMA POOL#0751960 100.1025 719,958.440 729,182.92 720,696.60 0.18% -8,486.32 5.000% 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 SEC ID:31403LMH1 FNMA POOL#0753425 100.0900 758,838.080 767,612,13 759,521.03 0.19 0/0 -8,091.10 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 SEC ID:31403NA23 FNMA POOL#0755165 100.0900 565,501.460 572,746.95 566,010.41 0.14% -6,736.54 5.000% 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 SEC ID: 31403Q6A3 FNMA POOL#0756372 100.0900 860,535.160 870,485.09 861,309.64 0.21% -9,175.45 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD I 1/0 1/03 SEC ID:31403SJRS FNMA POOL#0784251 100.0440 3,114,906.280 3,157,249.54 3,116,276.84 0.76% -40,972.70 5.000% 11/01/2019 DD 11/01/04 SEC ID: 31405BH46 FNMA POOL#0789670 100.0430 880,684.060 892,655.86 881,062.75 0.21% -11,593.11 5.000% 12/01/2019 DD 12/01/04 SEC ID:31405HJP4 FNMA POOL 00792432 100.0450 860,564.110 872,262.41 860,951.36 0.21% -11,311.05 5.000% 10/01/2019 DD 10/01/04 SEC ID:31405LLM9 FNMA POOL#0794195 100.0440 899,324.480 911,549.68 899,720.18 0.22% -11,829.50 5.000% 11/0 1/2019 DD I 1/0 1/04 SEC ID:31405NKG9 FNMA POOL#0797160 100.0430 3,149,450.470 3,192,263.30 3,150,804.73 0.77% -41,458.57 5.000% 12/01/2019 DD 12/01/04 SEC ID: 31405RTR7 FNMA POOL#0797408 100.0430 803,655.390 814,580.08 804,000.96 0.20% -10,579.12 5.000% 12/01/2019 DD 12/01/04 SEC ID:31405R3R5 FNMA POOL 40797414 100.0430 896,087.900 908,269.09 896,473.22 0.22% -11,795.87 5.000% 12/01/2019 DD 12/01/04 SEC ID:31405R3X2 FNMA POOL#0803923 100.0430 3,067,537.950 3,109,237.30 3,068,856.99 0.75% .40,380.31 5.000% 12/01/2019 DD 12/01/04 SEC ID:31406AD41 41812005 9.37.-57AM pD7, 8 Workbench Report ID; OLS013 Asset Detail Report Currency: USD @ Mellon by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSGOOO 10000 3/31/2005 Status: FINAL ''Price. ;J!7 Par,.", FNMA POOL#0807711 100.0430 3,054,911.800 3,096,439.50 3,056,225.41 0.74% -40,214.09 5.000%01/01/2020 DD 01/01/05 SEC ID:31406EKY9 FORD MOTOR CR CO NT 100.2960 1,000,000.000 965,170.00 1,002,960.00 0.24% 37,790.00 6.7500/6 05/15/2005 DD 05/24/93 SEC ID:345397GV9 GNMA POOL#0421389 104.6340 8,749.860 9,183.26 9,155-33 0.00% -27.93 6.500%04/15/2026 DD 04/01/96 SEC ID: 36206UC23 GNMA POOL#0449851 104.4693 12,045.940 12,642.59 12,584.31 0.00% -58.28 6.500%01/15/2028 DD 01/01/98 SEC ID: 36208FWLO GNMA POOL#0466845 104.5400 32,571.840 34,185.17 34,050.60 0,01% -134.57 6.500%06/15/2028 DD 06/01/98 SEC 11):36209BTA6 GNMA POOL#0468052 104.5350 110,228.530 115,688.28 115,227.39 0.03% -460.89 6.500%07/15/2028 DD 07/01/98 SEC ID:36209C5M4 GNMA POOL#0476041 104.5400 136,512.320 143,060.66 142,709.98 0.03% -350.68 6.500%06/15/2028 DD 06/01/98 SEC ID: 36209MZE7 GNMA POOL#0478626 104.5070 120,067.150 125,826.62 125,478.58 0.03% -348.04 6.500%01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99 SEC ID:36209QVT9 GNMA POOL#0480598 104.5180 28,656.200 30,030.80 29,950.89 0.01% -79.91 6.500016 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 SEC ID: 36209S3F6 GNMA POOL#0512235 104.4530 8,354.030 8,767.81 8,726.03 0.00% -41.78 6.500% 11/15/2029 DD 11/01/99 SEC ID:36211 GBC6 GNMA POOL#0514326 104.4740 78,185.350 81,935.80 81,683.36 0.02% -252.44 6.500%07/15/2029 DD 07/01/99 SEC ID: 3621 lJLF2 GNMA 11 POOL#0080023 101.8770 149,593.620 152,071.26 152,401.49 0.04% 330.23 VAR RT 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 SEC ID:36225CA7,9 GNMA 11 POOL#080088M 100.1090 183,863.490 187,885.50 184,063.90 0.04% -3,821.60 7-375%06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97 SEC ID:36225CC20 GNMA 11 POOL#0080395 99.9590 164,622.120 163,130.23 164.554.62 0.04% 1,424.39 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/00 SEC ID:36225CNM4 41812005 9:37,57AM PDT 9 Workbench Asset Detail Report M: GL8013 Base Currency: USD @ Mellon by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD-COMOZJTDATED-OCSGWO 10000 3/31/2005 Status: FINAL wl, Price _4 X . aaw 13 K P GNMA II POOL#080408X 99.9490 1,499,543.170 1,484,313.43 1,498,778.40 0.37% 14,464.97 VAR RT 05/20/2030 DD 05/01/00 SEC ID:36225CN28 GNMA 11 POOL#0080965 99.5940 1,311,244.050 1,310,424.51 1,305,920.40 0.32% -4,504.11 VAR RT 07/20/2034 DD 07/01/04 SEC ID:36225DCB8 GOLDMAN SACHS GRP MTN 100.1870 3,500,000.000 3,507,850.50 3,506,545.00 0.85% -1,305.50 #TROO194 VAR RT 10/27/2006 DD 10/29/03 SEC ID:38141 EJ136 GOLDMAN SACHS GRP MTN 100.0930 2,000,000.000 2,001,900.00 2,001,860.00 0.49% -40.00 #TR00203 VAR RT 03130/2007 DD 04/01/04 SEC ID: 38141EJL4 GOLDMAN SACHS GRP MTN 100.5000 800,000.000 800,000.00 804,000.00 0.20% 4,000.00 #TR00207 VAR RT 07/23/2009 DD 07/23/04 SEC ID:3814 1 EJQ3 GOLDMAN SACHS MTN#TR 00216 99.9840 5,500,000.000 5,500,196.00 5,499,120.00 1.34% -1,076.00 VAR RT 08101/2006 DD 02/01/05 SEC ID:3814 1 EJZ3 GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH 100.8110 462,303.270 462,303.27 466,052.55 0.11% 3,749.28 VAR RT 02/16/2030 SEC ID: 3837H4NX9 HSBC BK USA MTN#SR00012 100.0780 250,000.000 250,170.00 250,195.00 0.06% 25.00 VAR RT 09/21/2007 DD 09/21/04 SEC ID:4042QOAM I HSBC FIN CORP MTN#TR 00002 99.9680 3,000,000.000 3,000,000.00 2,999,040.00 0.73% -960.00 VAR RT 02/28/2007 DD 03/29/05 SEC ID:40429JAB3 MORGAN STANLEY 100.1870 2,000,000-000 2,002,980.00 2,003,740.00 0.49% 760.00 VAR RT 0 1/12/2007 DD 0 1/13/04 SEC ID:61746BAK2 MORGAN STANLEY NT 97.2340 3,200,000.000 3,149,248.00 3,111,488.00 0.76% -37,760.00 3.875%01/15/2009 DD 01/13/04 SEC ID:61746BALO MORGAN STANLEY NT 99.9840 650,000.000 650,000.00 649,896.00 0.16% -104.00 VAR RT 11/09/2006 DD 11 12/04 SEC ID:61746SAZ2 NORWEST FINL INC NT 100.3590 150.000.000 153,084.00 150,538.50 0.04% -2,545.50 7.600-/,,05/03/2005 DD 05/03/00 SEC ID:669383DX6 41812005 9:37.-57AM PDT 10 Workbench Asset Detail Report ID: GL8013 Base Currency: USD Mellon by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSDLCONSOLIDATED-OCSGOOO 10000 3/31/2005 Status: FINAL iRL RESIDENTIAL ASSET 03-RS 11 AIII3 100.1600 544,154.260 544,154.26 545,024.91 0.13% 870.65 VAR RT 12/25/2033 DD 12/30/03 SEC ID: 760985K83 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 1 105.7000 2,774,342.070 2,774,342.07 2,932,479.57 0.71% 158,137.50 6.340%03/01/2021 SEC ID: 83162CLJO SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 01 105.0350 1,782,321.970 1,782,321.97 1,872,061.88 0.46% 89,739.91 6.640%02/10/2011 DD 02/2 1/01 SEC ID:83164 1 DD4 TOYOTA MTR CR MTN#TR00413 99.9680 2,000,000.000 1,998,188.00 1,999,360.00 0.49% 1,172.00 VAR RT 09/18/2006 DD 03/16/05 SEC ID:89233PTE6 UNITED AIRLS PASSTHRU 01-1 C 12.6970 1,600,000.000 1,600,000.00 203,152.00 0.05% -1,396,848.00 6.831%03/01/2010 DD 08/22/01 SEC ID: 909317BC2 U S TREASURY NOTES 104.5625 20,000,000.000 22,620,312.50 20,912,500.00 5.10% -1,707,812.50 06.250%02/15/2007 DD 02/15/97 SEC ID: 9128272,10 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 105.0000 16,849,840.000 14,941,353.02 17,692,332.00 4.31% 2,750,978.98 3.375%01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97 SEC ID:9128272M3 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 107.5940 3,540,960.000 3,848,936.96 3,809,860.50 0.93% -39,076.46 3.625%01/15/2008 DD 01/15/98 SEC ID: 9128273T7 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 110.3125 15,115,490,000 16,732,849.02 16,674,274.91 4.06% -58,574.11 3.875%01/15/2009 DD 01/15/99 SEC ID: 9128274Y5 U S TREASURY NOTES 101.5625 3,900,000.000 4,288,149.14 3,960,937.50 0,97% -327,211.64 05.750% 11/15/2005 DD 11/15/00 SEC ID:9128276N7 U S TREASURY NOTES 97.6900 10,900,000.000 10,684,196.02 10,648,210.00 2.59% -35.986.02 3.375% 12/15/2008 DD 12/15/03 SEC ID: 912828BT6 U S TREASURY NOTES 99.0200 27,500,000.000 27,463,468.63 27,230,500.00 6.63% -232,968.63 2.750%06/30/2006 DD 06/30/04 SEC ID: 912828CMO U S TREASURY NOTES 98.9100 49,000,000,000 49,103,07.41 48,465,900.00 11.81% -638,027.41 2.750%07/31/2006 DD 07/31/04 SEC ID: 912828CQI U S TREASURY NOTES 98.2900 55,300,000.000 55,018,326.59 54,354,370.00 13.24% -663,956.59 2.37.50/6 08/31/2006 DD 08/31/04 SEC ID:912828CU2 41812005 9:37.-57AM PDT 11 Workbench _- ---------- Asset DetailReport ID: GL8013 Base Currency- USD Mellon by Currency Alternate Base Currency: @ e : OCSD-CONSOLrDATED-GCSCvC*O 10000 3/31/2005 ExchangStatusRate: FINAL it .......... ---------........... B U S TREASURY NOTES 98.6700 20,800,000.000 20,640,268.90 20,523,360.00 5.00% -116,908.90 2.875% 11/30/2006 DD 11/30/04 SEC ID:912828DD9 VIRGINIA ELEC&PWR 01 SER A 101.6710 1,750,000.000 1,743,840.00 1,779,242.50 0.43% 35,402.50 5.750%03/31/2006 DD 03/27/01 SEC ID:927804ENO TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 345,525,732.890 348,768,244.44 345,827,743.25 84.26% -2,940,541.19 TOTAL ASSETS U.S. DOLLAR 423,389,744.100 413,350,560.65 410,410,019.46 100.00% .2,940,541.19 TOTAL ASSETS-BASE: 423,389,744.100 413,350,560.65 410,410,019.46 100.000/0 -2,940,541.19 41812005 9:37.57AM PDT 12 Workbench Asset Detail Report ID: CILSO13 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alt°ruate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: OCSD-CONSOLIDATED-OCSCa00010000 3/31/2005 Status: FEffAL ---- --- -- --- — Net Unrealized Price Coat Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares par Base Base Total Sane U.S. DOLLAR CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS INTEREST RECEIVABLE 2,219,984.02 2,219,984.02 0.540/a 0.00 CASH 10,390.63 10,390.63 0.000/0 0.00 RECEIVABLE FOR INVESTMENTS 12,999,071.63 12,999,071.63 3.17% 0.00 SOLD PAYABLE FOR INVESTMENTS -28,055,344.77 -28,055,344.77 -6.84% 0.00 PURCHASED FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS 99.3519 3,000,000.000 2,980,556.33 2,980,556.33 0.73% 0.00 SYSTEMMAT 04/27/2005SEC 1D: 313385EW2 FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS 99.5091 2,000,000.000 1,990,182.50 1,990,182.50 0.48% 0.00 DISCMAT 05/20/2005SEC ID: 313385FV3 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP 99.1200 2,500,000.000 2,478,000.00 2,478,000.00 0.60% 0.00 DISCMAT 04/05/2005SEC ID: 313397DY4 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP 99.3559 2,000,000.000 1,987,117.78 1,987,117.78 0.48% 0.00 DISCMAT 05/10/2005SEC ID: 313397FK2 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP 99.3374 2,000,000.000 1,986,748.89 1,986,748.89 0.48% 0.00 DISCMAT 05/17/2005SEC ID: 313397FS5 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP 99.2922 1,587,000.000 1,575,767.57 1,575,767.57 0.380/6 0.00 DISCMAT 05/31/2005SEC ID: 313397GGO FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP 99.3233 2,000,000.000 1,986,466.67 1,986,466.67 0.48% 0.00 DISCMAT 06/14/2005SEC ID: 313397OW5 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP 99.1483 4,000,000.000 3,965,933.33 3,965,933.33 0.97% 0.00 DISCMAT 06/30/2005SEC ID: 313397HN4 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 99.3499 10,700,000.000 10,630,444.17 10,630,444.17 2.59% 0.00 NTSMAT 004/27/2005SEC ID: 313589EW9 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 99.3439 1,400,000.000 1,390,814.04 1,390,814.04 0.34% 0.00 DISCOUNTMAT 05/11/2005SEC ID: 313589FL2 1 Workbench ........__......... _ Asset Detail Report M: OLS013 Base Currency" USD by Currency Alternate Base curreney: Exchange Rate: Ocsn-coiNSOLLDATED-003000010000 3/31/2005 Status: FINAL Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value %of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN 99.2518 1,000,000.000 992,517.78 992,517.78 0.24% 0.00 DISCOUNTMAT 06/29/2005SEC ID: 313589HM8 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 98.8462 1,000,000.000 988,461.67 988,461.67 0.240/a 0.00 DISC08/01/2005SECID: 313589JW4 UBS AG STAMFORD HRH INSTL 99.9550 10,000,000.000 9,995,500.00 9,995,500.00 2.44% 0.00 C/DVAR RT 07/05/2005 DD 07/02/04SEC ID:90261GE47 U S TREASURY BILLDUE 99.7958 3,800,000.000 3,792,241.67 3,792,241.67 0.921a 0.00 04/14/2005 DD 10/14/2004SEC ID:912795SJI U S TREASURY BILLDUE 98.9593 9,000,000.000 8,906,337.09 8,906,337.09 2.17% 0.00 04/28/2005 DD 10/28/04SEC ID: 912795SL6 U S TREASURY BILL 0.000% 98,8200 3,300,000.000 3,261,060.00 3,261,060.00 0.790/6 0.00 06/09/2005 DD 12/09/04SEC ID: 912795SS1 U S TREASURY BILLDUE 98.9002 7,000,000.000 6,923,014.00 6,923,014.00 1.690/a 0.00 07/21/2005 DD 0 1/20/2005SEC ID:912795VH1 WELLS FARGO BANK NA INSTL C/D 100.0000 1,600,000.000 1,600,000.00 1,600,000.00 0.390/a 0.00 2.790%04/13/2005 DD 03/31/05SEC ID:9497P2FT9 LEHMAN CAT 1 REPO REPO02.630% 100.0000 8,000,000.000 8,000,000.00 8,000,000.00 1.95°/a 0.00 04/01/2005 DD 03/31/05SEC ID: 99433L698 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH 100.0000 1,977,011.210 1,977,011.21 1,977,011.21 0.480/a 0.00 MGMTSEC ID:996085247 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 77,964,011.210 64,592,276.21 64,582,276.21 15.740/6 0.00 FIRED INCOME SECURITIES AIG SUNAMERICA GLOBAL REG S S. 109.8670 752,000.000 826,199.84 826,199.84 0.20% 0.00 850°/a 08/O1/2008 DD 08/08/0ISECID:U00907AAO COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG S. 99.9100 5,400,000.000 5,400,000.00 5,395,140.00 1.31% -4,860.00 0001%04/01/2020 DD 04/01/05SEC ID:0 1 FOS0445 COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTO 5. 99.6900 3,000,000.000 2,996,718.75 2,990,700.00 0.73% -6,018.75 000%O5/01/2020 DD 05/01/05SEC ID:0 1 F050452 2 Workbench,, _ ....... .... .. - --- __. ........__.__.. . ..........--- ---..._ _ . Asset Detail Report ID: OLS013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Aiternnte Base Currency: oc9D6CO1vs0UwT"-ocscmm 10000 3/31/2005 Eischange Rate: Stetm: FINAL --- -- ------.._ _ -- --� ___- ---- --- --- --- - ---- -.. - -- Net Unrealized price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 5. 100.1300 4,000,000.000 4,003,828.12 4,005,200.00 0.980/0 1,371.88 500%04/O1/2035 DD 04/01/05SEC ID:01F052649 ALLSTATE CORP SR NT7.875% 100.3430 1,600,000.000 1,594,032.00 1,605,488.00 0.39% 11,456.00 05/01/2005 DD 05/01/OOSEC ID: 020002AL5 ASSOCIATES CORP NORTH AMER 100.6250 3,000,000.000 3,1 12,350.00 3,018,750.00 0.74% -93,600.00 SR6.625%06/15/2005 DD 06/09/95SEC ID:046003FFI BANK AMER N A TRANCHE 100.0000 3,500,000.000 3,499,940.20 3,500,000.00 0.85% 59.80 #TR00255VAR RT 08/08/2005 DD 02/07/05SEC ID:06050VLQ8 BANKAMERICA CORP MTN SR 100.4060 150,000.000 153,652.50 150,609.00 0.040% -3,043.50 00 1507.125%05/12/2005 DD 05/12/95SEC ID:06605LOF0 CIT GROUP INC NEW SR NTVAR RT 100.4370 1,500,000,000 1,507,005.00 1,506,555.00 0.37% -450.00 09/22/2006 DD 09/23/03SEC ID: 125581AF5 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000- 100.7953 933,710.480 913,431.45 941,135.81 0.23% 27,704.36 111507.500%12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99SEC ID:302998GE3 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP MTN 97.3700 10,000,000.000 9,993,100.00 9,737,000.00 2.37% -256,100.00 4.000%09/22/2009 DD 09/22/04SEC ID:3128X3WY5 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 99.2710 773,028.640 773,852.17 767,393.26 0.190/0 -6,458.91 AVAR RT 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/97SEC ID:3133TCE95 FHLMC GROUP#78-6064 6.3840/6 103.5020 52,774.710 51,488.32 54,622.88 0.01% 3,134.56 01/01/2028 DD 12/01/97SEC ID: 31348SWZ3 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS6. 108.6250 2,100,000.000 2,030,133.00 2,281,125.00 0.56% 250,992.00 625%09/15/2009 DD 09/01/99SEC ID:31359MEY5 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBSS. 101.4250 2,350,000.000 2,385,461.50 2,383,487.50 0.580/0 -1,974.00 250%06/15/2006 DD 06/22/01SEC ID:31359MJX2 FNMA POOL#0254510 5.0000/6 100.1780 623,968.650 642,687.70 625,079.31 0.15% -17,608.39 11/01/2017 DD 10/01/02SEC ID: 31371KVB4 3 Workbench Asset Detail Report W: MA013 Base Cwmncr USD by Currency Altermte Base cwmneF: 0csD-00fAH DA7W-0c8000010000 3/31/2005 ��e Rate: stag: FINAL .........._.......------------------ Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of (lain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base FNMA POOL#0254631 5.000% 100.1580 134,087.950 138,110.59 134,299.81 0.030/a -3,810.78 02/01/2018 DD 01/01/03SEC ID: 31371KY47 FNMA POOL#0254760 5.000% 100.1310 120,356.760 123,967.45 120,514.43 0.03% -3,453.02 06/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 31371K5V9 FNMA POOL#0254866 5.000% 100.1100 54,648.800 56,288.27 54,708.91 0.01% -1,579.36 09/01/2018 DD 08/01/03SEC ID: 31371LCB3 FNMA POOL#0254953 5.000% 100.0970 289,613.330 293,324.01 289,894.25 0.07% -3,429.76 11/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 31371LE21 FNMA POOL#0254987 5.000% 100.1025 783,139.750 793,173.73 783,942.69 0.190/0 -9,231.04 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 3137ILF46 FNMA POOL#0323980 6.000% 103.3730 133,456.980 139,337.42 137,958.48 0.03% -1,378.94 04/01/2014 DD 09/01/99SEC ID: 31374T2MO FNMA POOL#0357328 5.000% 100.1638 22,605.050 23,283.20 22,642.07 0.01% -641.13 01/01/2018 DD 01/01/03SEC ID: 31376J4M8 FNMA POOL#0357430 5.000% 100.1310 1,199,375.030 1,212,868.00 1,200,946.21 0.290/a -11,921.79 09/01/2018 DD 09/01/03SEC ID: 31376KA71 FNMA POOL#0456482 6.000% 103.3760 36,506.480 38,115.03 37,738.94 0.01% -376.09 02/01/2014 DD 02/01/99SEC ID: 31381CCT2 FNMA POOL#0509649 6.000% 103.3600 97,201.980 101,484.94 100,467.97 0.021a -1,016.97 09/01/2014 DD 09/01/99SEC ID: 31383QEWO FNMA POOL#0535451 6.000% 103.3650 103,887.500 108,465.04 107,383.31 0.030/a -1,081.73 06/01/2015 DD 07/01/60SEC ID: 31384VZQ8 FNMA POOL#0555363 5.000% 100.1510 287,340.570 295,960.77 287,774.45 0.07% -8,186.32 04/01/2018 DD 03/01/03SEC ID: 31385W5Y1 FNMA POOL#0555453 5.000% 100.1440 29,870.710 30,253.43 29,913.72 0.01% -339.71 05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03SEC ID: 31385XBW6 4 VYbrkbanch„ __ ...... Report M: OU013 Asset Deta31 Haae Currenep: UBD by Currency Alternate Hare Currency: OcsD-xm0LrDATw-OCBGO0010000 3/31/2005 Exchange Rate. status: FIAAL ----------- -- --- --_ .--- — Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Baae FNMA POOL#0555545 5.000% 100.1440 239,163.540 246,338.45 239,507.94 0.06% -6,830.51 06/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 31385XES2 FNMA POOL#0555621 5.000% 100.1025 824,410.520 833,685.14 825,255.77 0.20% -8,429.37 07/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31385XG68 FNMA POOL#0681309 5.000% 100.1580 448,975.110 462,444.36 449,684.49 0.11% -12,759.87 02/01/2018 DD 02/01/03SEC ID: 31391Y3S4 FNMA POOL#0681334 5.000% 100.1580 53,933.580 55,551.59 54,018.80 0.01% -1,532.79 02/01/2018 DD 01/01/03SEC ID: 31391Y4T1 FNMA POOL#0684908 5.000% 100.1310 294,251.630 298,021.75 294,637.10 O.O7o/a -3,384.65 06/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SECID: 3140OD3R1 FNMA POOL#0685200 5.000% 100.1440 161,003.960 163,066.85 161,235.81 0.040/a -1,831.04 03/01/2018 DD 03/01/03SEC ID: 31400EOH7 FNMA POOL#0685665 5.000% 100.1580 27,378.040 28,199.38 27,421.30 0.01% -778.08 02/01/2018 DD 02/01/03SEC 1D: 31400EW22 FNMA POOL#0686318 5.00010 100.1510 243,376.640 250,677.93 243,744.14 0.06% -6,933.79 03/01/2018 DD 03/01/03SEC ID: 31400FPB7 FNMA POOL#0688739 5.000% 100.1310 91,690.390 94,441.10 91,810.50 0.02% -2,630.60 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31400JEL9 FNMA POOL#0689859 5.0000/a 100.1310 82,235.010 83,288.65 82,342.74 0.02% -945.91 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 31400KM08 FNMA POOL#0693834 5.000% 100.1510 519,982.390 535,581.85 520,767.56 0.13% -14,814.29 03/01/2018 DD 03/01/03SEC ID: 3140OPY74 FNMA POOL#0695852 5.000% 100.1370 189,125.120 194,798.87 189.384.22 0.05% -5,414.65 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 31400SBVO FNMA POOL#0695889 5.000% 100.1370 648,202.050 667,648.12 649,090.09 0.160/6 -18,558.03 05/01/2018 DD 05/01/03SEC ID: 31400SC23 5 Workbench Asset Detail -Report ID: M8013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currener oCSD cC0 VS0ZJ=TW-OCOGO0010000 3/31/2005 Exchange Rate: Status: FWAL Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base FNMA POOL#0697026 5.0000/0 100.1370 19,724.090 20,315.83 19,751.11 0.000/0 -564.72 05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03SEC ID: 31400TLF2 FNMA POOL#0702210 5.000% 100.1025 200,728.840 206,750.70 200,934.64 0.050/0 -5,816.06 O5/01/2018 DD O5/01/03SEC ID: 31401ADP9 FNMA POOL#0702328 5.000% 100,1370 115,453.400 116,932.64 115,611.57 0.03% -1,321.07 05/01/2018 DD 04/01/03SEC ID: 31401AHD2 FNMA POOL#0709148 5.000% 100.1240 246,918.590 254,326.16 247,224.77 0.069/6 -7,101.39 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401HZM7 FNMA POOL#0709360 5.000% 100.1240 540,393.880 547,317.68 541,063.97 0.13% -6,253.71 07/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401JB56 FNMA POOL#0709826 5.000% 100.1310 95,705.500 96,931.72 95,830.87 0.020/0 -1,100.85 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SECID: 31401JSP4 FNMA POOL#0709917 5.000% 100.1310 198,221.810 200,761.52 198,481.48 0.050/0 -2,280.04 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401JVJ4 FNMA POOL#0709963 5.000% 100.1025 17,738.160 17,965.44 17,756.35 0.000/0 -209.09 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401JWY0 FNMA POOL#0710235 5.000% 100.1240 510,144.730 525,449.09 510,777.31 0.120/0 -14,671.78 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401KBC8 FNMA POOL#0713344 5.000% 100.1310 13,156.570 13,551.26 13,173.81 0.000/0 -377.45 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SECID: 3140INP52 FNMA POOL#0713365 5.000% 100.1240 221,823.940 224,666.05 222,099.00 0.050/0 -2,567.05 07/01/2018 DD 07/01/03SEC ID: 31401NQSI FNMA POOL#0720319 5.000% 100.1240 627,230.670 635,267.07 628,008.44 0.15% -7,258.63 07/01/2018 DD 07/01/03SEC 1D: 31401 WG45 FNMA POOL#0720369 5.0001% 10O.1025 1,924,542.540 1,982,278.82 1,926,515.73 0.470/a -55,763.09 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401 WJNO 6 Workbench, ... ........ . ............ ... _...................... OLS013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: ocsDLCONSOLZDaTEv-acsaoo010000 3/31/2005 Emhnnge Rate: states: FMAt. Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Grain/Loss Description BBSe Shares Par Base Base Total Base FNMA POOL#0721629 5.000a/a 100.1240 266,978.170 274,987.53 267,309.22 0.07% -7,678.31 07/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31401XVW4 FNMA POOL#0723487 5.000a/o 100.1240 187,956.350 190,070.87 188,189.42 0.05% -1,881.45 06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03SEC ID: 31402AXQ4 FNMA POOL#0725530 5.000% 99,9802 3,057,543.620 3,099,107.09 3,056,938.93 0.74% -42,168.16 06/01/2019 DD 05/01/04SEC ID: 31402DA75 FNMA POOL#0729601 5.0000/6 100.1170 361,647.730 366,281.35 362,070.86 0.090/0 -4,210.49 07/01/2018 DD 07/01/03SEC ID: 31402HRW3 FNMA POOL#0732873 5.000a/a 100.0970 32,074.950 32,485.89 32,106.06 0.01% -379.83 11/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 31402MFN5 FNMA POOL#0737130 5.000% 100.1100 571,535.510 578,858.31 572,164.20 0.14a/a -6,694.11 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 31402S4P9 FNMA POOL#073821 1 5.000% 100.1025 478,755.630 484,889.71 479,246.49 0.12a/a -5,643.22 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 3l 402UDQ2 FNMA POOL#0738487 5.000% 100.0970 166,945.530 169,084.52 167,107.47 0.04a/o -1,977.05 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 3l 402UNC2 FNMA POOL#0740457 5.000% 100.1025 1,978,332.520 2,005,225.48 1,980,360.86 0.48% -24,864.62 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 31402WTN8 FNMA POOL#0740471 5.000a/a 100.1025 656,429.540 664,840.03 657,102.56 0.16% -7,737.47 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 31402WT40 FNMA POOL#0740748 5.000% 100.1 100 698,655.800 707,607.32 699,424.32 0.17% -8,183.00 10/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31402W5H7 FNMA POOL#0743868 5.000a/o 100.1025 33,484.570 33,913.59 33,518.90 0.01% -394.69 11/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 31403BMR1 FNMA POOL#0744008 5.000% 100.1310 907,255.300 918,879.51 908,443.80 0.22% -10,435.71 07/01/2018 DD 09/01/03SEC ID: 31403BR54 7 Workbench ...... ... _............._ _ ....._... ................ ...... _.... ---.._.._ - .. .. ..... Asset Detail Report W.* OU013 Base Currency: UBD by Currency Alternate Baw C"rreney' E�cbaage Rate: 0MDLC0Ns0LFn42=-o�D10000 3/31/2005 stag,: FINAL Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of (lain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base FNMA POOL#0744316 5.000% 100.1025 141,148.370 142,956.84 141,293.09 0.03% -1,663.75 09/01/2018 DD 09/01/03SEC ID: 31403B3Z4 FNMA POOL#0747914 5.000% 100.0970 290,752.080 294,477.35 291,034.11 0.07% -3,443.24 1 1/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403F3XO FNMA POOL#0748400 5.000% 100.1025 176,314.000 178,573.03 176,494.77 0.04% -2,078.26 08/01/2018 DD 09/01/03SEC ID: 31403ONR9 FNMA POOL#0748899 5.000% 100.1025 860,149.720 871,170.39 861,031.61 0.21% -10,138.78 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403G7L0 FNMA POOL#0750377 5.000% 100.1025 1,907,568.790 1,932,009.51 1,909,524.58 0.47% -22,484.93 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403JUA2 FNMA POOL 40750380 5.000% 100.1025 1,659,587.840 1,680,851.33 1,661,289.38 0.40% -19,561.95 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403JUD6 FNMA POOL#0750445 5.0000/a 100.1025 163,927.980 166,028.31 164,096.05 0.040/a -1,932.26 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403JWE2 FNMA POOL#0751960 5.000% 100.1025 719,958.440 729,182.92 720,696.60 0.180/0 -8,486.32 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403LMH1 FNMA POOL#0753425 5.000% 100.0900 758,838.080 767,612.13 759,521.03 0.190/0 -8,091.10 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403NA23 FNMA POOL#0755165 5.000% 100.0900 565,501.460 572,746.95 566,010.41 0.14% -6,736.54 12/01/2018 DD I 1/01/03SEC ID: 31403Q6A3 FNMA POOL#0756372 5.000% 100.0900 860,535.160 870,485.09 861,309.64 0.21% -9,175.45 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC ID: 31403SJRS FNMA POOL 410784251 5.000% 100.0440 3,114,906.280 3,157,249.54 3,116,276.84 0.760/a -40,972.70 11/01/2019 DD 11/01/04SEC ID: 31405BH46 FNMA POOL#0789670 5.000% 100.0430 880,684.060 892,655.86 881,062.75 0.21% -11,593.11 12/01/2019 DD 12/01/04SEC ID: 31405HJP4 $ Workbench ........ ......._.._ .__.._ - _.......__._._... ..............._...._............................ .. ........... ....... ........__. - _.__. __..._.._. ...... ... . Asset Detail Report m: C"013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency: 0Csn-00NB0 rnana-OCS000010000 3/31/2005 Exchange Rate: $tat,„: FWA, Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss -Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base FNMA POOL#0792432 5.000% 100.0450 860,564.110 872,262.41 860,951.36 0.21% -11,311.05 10/01/2019 DD 10/01/04SEC ID: 31405LLM9 FNMA POOL#0794195 5.000% 100.0440 899,324.480 911,549.68 899,720.18 0.22% -11,829.50 11/01/2019 DD 11/01/04SEC ID: 31405NK09 FNMA POOL#0797160 5.000% 100.0430 3,149,450.470 3,192,263.30 3,150,804.73 0.77% -41,458.57 12/01/2019 DD 12/01/04SEC 1D: 31405RTR7 FNMA POOL#0797408 5.000% 100.0430 803,655.390 814,580.08 804,000.96 0.20% -10,579.12 12/01/2019 DD 12/01/04SEC ID: 31405R3R5 FNMA POOL 00797414 5.0009/6 100,0430 896,087.900 908,269.09 896,473.22 0.22% -11,795.87 12/01/2019 DD 12/01/04SEC ID: 31405R3X2 FNMA POOL#0803923 5.000% 100.0430 3,067,537.950 3,109,237.30 3,068,856.99 0.75% -40,380.31 12/01/2019 DD 12/01/04SEC ID: 31406AD41 FNMA POOL#0807711 5.000% 100.0430 3,054,911.800 3,096,439.50 3,056,225.41 0.740/a -40,214.09 01/01/2020 DD 01/01/05SEC ID: 31406EKY9 FORD MOTOR CR CO NT6.7501% 100.2960 1,000,000.000 965,170.00 1,002,960.00 0.240/c 37,790.00 05/15/2005 DD 05/24/93SECID: 3453970V9 GNMA POOL#0421389 6.500% 104.6340 8,749.860 9,183.26 9,155.33 0.00% -27.93 04/15/2026 DD 04/01/96SEC ID: 36206UC23 GNMA POOL#0449851 6.500% 104.4693 12,045.940 12,642.59 12,584.31 0.00°/a -58.28 01/15/2028 DD 01/01/98SEC ID: 36208FWLO GNMA POOL#0466845 6.500% 104.5400 32,571.840 34,185.17 34,050.60 0.01% -134.57 06/15/2028 DD 06/01/98SEC ID: 36209BTA6 GNMA POOL 90468052 6.500% 104.5350 110,228.530 115,688.28 115,227.39 0.03% -460.89 07/15/2028 DD 07/01/98SEC ID: 36209C5M4 GNMA POOL 40476041 6.500% 104.5400 136,512.320 143,060.66 142,709.98 0.030/6 -350.68 06/15/2028 DD 06/01/98SEC ID: 36209MZE7 9 Workbench __....... _.._.__. - __........ .... ........ Asset Detail Report ID: 014013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Aitermte Base C"neney` 0C8D-00N60LrDATW-000CHM10000 3/31/2005 Exchange Rate: status: FIIffAL Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value %of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base ONMA POOL#0478626 6.500% 104.5070 120,067.150 125,826.62 125,478.58 0.03% -348.04 01/15/2029 DD 01/01/99SEC ID. 36209QVT9 GNMA POOL#0480598 6.500% 104.5180 28,656.200 30,030.80 29,950.89 0.01% -79.91 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98SEC ID: 36209S3F6 GNMA POOL#0512235 6.5000/6 104.4530 8,354.030 8,767.81 8,726.03 0.0&/a -41.78 11/15/2029 DD 11/01/99SEC ID: 36211GBC6 GNMA POOL#0514326 6.500% 104.4740 78,185.350 81,935.80 81,683.36 0.02% -252.44 07/15/2029 DD 07/01/99SEC ID: 36211JLF2 GNMA II POOL#0080023VAR RT 101.8770 149,593.620 152,071.26 152,401.49 0.040/a 330.23 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96SEC ID: 36225CAZ9 GNMA II POOL#080088M 7.375% 100.1090 183,863.490 187,885.50 184,063.90 0.04% -3,821.60 06/20/2027 DD 06/01/97SEC ID: 36225CC20 GNMA 1I POOL#0080395VAR RT 99.9590 164,622.120 163,130.23 164,554.62 0.04% 1,424.39 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/OOSEC ID: 36225CNM4 GNMA II POOL#080408XVAR RT 99.9490 1,499,543.170 1,484,313.43 1,498,778.40 0.371% 14,464.97 05/20/2030 DD 05/01/OOSEC 1D: 36225CN28 GNMA 11 POOL#0080965VAR RT 99.5940 1,311,244.050 1,310,424.51 1,305,920.40 0.32% -4,504.11 07/20/2034 DD 07/01/04SEC ID: 36225DCB8 GOLDMAN SACHS GRP MTN 100.1870 3,500,000.000 3,507,850.50 3,506,545.00 0.85% -1,305.50 #TROO194VAR RT 10/27/2006 DD 10/29/03SEC JD: 38141EJB6 GOLDMAN SACHS GRP MTN 100.0930 2,000,000.000 2,001,900.00 2,001,860.00 0.49% -40.00 #TR00203VAR RT 03/30/2007 DD 04/01/04SEC ID:38141EJIA GOLDMAN SACHS GRP MTN 100.5000 800,000.000 800,000.00 804,000.00 0.20% 4,000.00 #TR00207VAR RT 07/23/2009 DD 07/23/04SEC ID,38141EJQ3 GOLDMAN SACHS MTN#TR 99.9840 5,500,000.000 5,500,196.00 5,499,120.00 1.34% -1,076.00 00216VAR RT 08/01/2006 DD 02/0 1/05SEC ID:3814 1 EJZ3 10 Workbench _ ....... .....__ _ ............. ....... ..... ...................... ....................... .. ... . ............ . ....... _ . .... ......... .. ..._-_........._............. _.... ...... Asset Detail Report m: OU013 Base Currency: UBD by Currency Alternate Base Curreacy: OCSD-CONSOUDATEa-OCS000010000 3/31/2005 - --- _.... . .............., E� hwWe Rate: states FnUL -- Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 100-8110 462,303.270 462,303.27 466,052.55 0.11% 3,749.28 FHVAR RT 02/16/2030SEC ID: 3837H4NX9 HSBC BK USA MTN#SR00012VAR 100.0780 250,000.000 250,170.00 250,195.00 0.06% 25.00 RT 09/21/2007 DD 09/21/04SEC ID: 4042QOAMI HSBC FIN CORP MTN#TR 99.9680 3,000,000.000 3,000,000.00 2,999,040.00 0.73% -960.00 00002VAR RT 02/28/2007 DD 03/29/05SEC ID: 40429JAB3 MORGAN STANLEYVAR RT 100.1870 2,000,000.000 2,002,980.00 2,003,740.00 0.49a/a 760.00 01/12/2007 DD 01/13/04SEC ID: 61746BAK2 MORGAN STANLEY NT 3.875% 97.2340 3,200,000.000 3,149,248.00 3,111,488.00 0.76% -37,760.00 01/15/2009 DD O1/13/04SECID: 61746BALD MORGAN STANLEY NTVAR RT 99.9840 650,000.000 650,000.00 649,896.00 0.16% -104.00 11/09/2006 DD 11/12/04SEC ID: 61746SAZ2 NORWEST FINL INC NT7.600% 100.3590 150,000.000 153,084.00 150,538.50 0.04% -2,545.50 05/03/2005 DD 05/03/OOSEC ID: 669383DX6 RESIDENTIAL ASSET 03-RS 11 100.1600 544,154.260 544,154.26 545,024.91 0.13% 870.65 AIIBVAR RT 12/25/2033 DD 12/30/03SEC ID- 760985K83 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 16. 105.7000 2,774,342.070 2,774,342.07 2,932,479.57 0.71% 158,137.50 340%03/01/2021 SEC ID: 83162CIJO SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SBIC-PS 01 105.0350 1,782,321.970 1,782,321.97 1,872,061.88 0.46% 89,739.91 6.640a/o02/10/2011 DD 02/21/01SEC ID:831641DD4 TOYOTA MTR CR MTN#TR00413VAR 99.9680 2,000,000.000 1,998,188.00 1,999,360.00 0.49% 1,172.00 RT 09/18/2006 DD 03/16/05SEC ID: 89233PTE6 UNITED AIRLS PASSPHRU 0 1-1 C 6. 12.6970 1,600,000.000 1,600,000.00 203,152.00 0.05a/a -1,396,848.00 831%03/01/2010 DD 08/22/0 1 SEC ID:909317BC2 U S TREASURY NOTES06.250% 104.5625 20,000,000.000 22,620,312.50 20,912,500.00 5.10a/0 -1,707,812.50 02/15/2007 DD 02/15/97SEC ID: 9128272JO 11 Workbench Asset Detail Report m: OLS013 Base Currency: USD by Currency Alternate Base Currency° OCsv-oOxsOL=TSD-OCSG00010000 3/31/2005 Eachnnge Rate: Status: FOAL Net Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Grain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX 105.0000 16,849,840,000 14,941,353.02 17,692,332.00 4.31% 2,750,978.98 NT 3.375%01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97SEC ID:9128272M3 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 107.5940 3,540,960.000 3,848,936.96 3,809,860.50 0.93% -39,076.46 3.625%01/15/2008 DD 0 1/15/98SEC ID:9128273T7 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 110.3125 15,115,490.000 16,732,849.02 16,674,274.91 4.06% -58,574.11 3.875%01/15/2009 DD 0 1/15/99SEC ID:9128274Y5 U S TREASURY NOTES05.750% 101,5625 3,900,000.000 4,288,149.14 3,960,937.50 0.97% -327,211.64 11/15/2005 DD 11/15/00SEC ID: 9128276N7 U S TREASURY NOTES 3.375% 97.6900 10,900,000.000 10,684,196.02 10,648,210.00 2.590/a -35,986.02 12/15/2008 DD 12/15/03SEC ID: 912828BT6 U S TREASURY NOTES 2.7500/a 99.0200 27,500,000.000 27,463,468.63 27,230,500.00 6.63% -232,968.63 06/30/2006 DD 06/30/04SEC ID: 912828CMO U S TREASURY NOTES 2.750% 98.9100 49,000,000.000 49,103,927.41 48,465,900.00 11.81% -638,027.41 07/31/2006 DD 07/31/04SEC ID: 912828CQI U S TREASURY NOTES 2.375% 98.2900 55,300,000.000 55,018,326.59 54,354,370.00 13.24% -663,956.59 08/31/2006 DD 08/31/04SEC ID: 912828CU2 U S TREASURY NOTES 2.875% 98.6700 20,800,000.000 20,640,268.90 20,523,360.00 5.00°/a -116,908.90 11/30/2006 DD 11/30/04SEC ID: 912828DD9 VIRGINIA ELEC&PWR 01 SER A5. 101.6710 1,750,000.000 1,743,840.00 1,779,242.50 0.43% 35,402.50 7500/a 03/31/2006 DD 03/27/OISEC ID:927804ENO TOTAL F UMD INCOME SECURITIES 345,625,732.890 348,769,284.44 345,827,743.25 84.26% -2,940,541.19 TOTAL ASSETS U.S. DOLLAR 423,389,744.200 413,350,560.65 410,410,019.46 100.00% -2,940,541.19 TOTAL ASSETS-BABE: 423,389,744.100 413,350,560.65 410,410,019.46 100.00% -2,940,541.19 12 Workbench. Transaction Detail Report Mx EIVBAM Reported by Transaction Category Base Curre=y. USD OC9D,C0NSGUDA2=-OCSQ0W I000O 3/1/2005 - 3/31/2005 statw:NNE, Trade Date Local Price Tran Settle Date Base Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss TYPe Description Reported Date. Base Ex Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENT TRANSACTIONS DISTRIBUTION TO PLAN ADMINISTRATOR U.S.DOLLAR CW TRAN TO ORANGE COUNTYSEC ID: 3/11/2005 0.000 -30,000,000.00 -30,000,000.00 0.00 NA9 I 234590CSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3/11/2005 PURCHASES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S.DOLLAR B FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N MAT 3/2/2005 99.9934 5,800,000.000 5,799,614.94 -5,799,614.94 0.00 03/03/2005SEC ID:313385CP9BROKER: 3/2/2005 BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC,NEW 3/2/2005 YORKOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N MAT 3/15/2005 99.9929 8,000,000.000 7,999,433.33 -7,999,433.33 0.00 03/16/2005SEC ID:313385DC7BROKER: 3/15/2005 GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NYOCSF07511102: 3/15/2005 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N MAT 3/23/2005 99.9928 4,000,000.000 3,999,711.11 -3,999,711.11 0.00 03/24/2005SEC ID:313385DL7BROKER: 3/23/2005 CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP, N 3/23/2005 YOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS DISC MAT 3/18/2005 99.5091 2,000,000.000 1,990,182.50 -1,990,182.50 0.00 05/20/2005SEC ID:313385FV3BROKER 3/18/2005 MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SMITH INC 3/18/2005 NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC MAT 3/10/2005 99.5844 10,000,000.000 9,958,444.44 -9,958,444.44 0.00 05/04/2005SEC ID:313397FD8BROKER: 3/10/2005 MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SMITH INC 3/10/2005 NYOCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Workbench *Actual Settle Date 1 .... . ........................._..................................... . . - - Transaction Detail Report W. EWBAM Reported by Transaction Category Beae Currency: USD 0C9D-o0als0r raaTM-OCOGOW 10000 3/1/2005 - 3/31/2005 States:FINAL Trade Date Local Price Tran. Settle Date Base Price Cost Amount Net Grain/Loss TYPe Description Reported Date Base Es Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base B FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DISC MAT 3/22/2005 99.3233 2,000,000.000 1,986,466.67 -1,986,466.67 0.00 06/14/2005SEC ID:313397GW5BROKER: 3/22/2005 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102:3/22/2005 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORD DISC MAT 3/17/2005 99.1483 4,000,000.000 3,965,933.33 -3,965,933.33 0.00 06/30/2005SEC ID: 313397HN4BROKER: 3/17/2005 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511 102:3/17/2005 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC MAT 3/15/2005 98.8417 4,300,000.000 4,250,191.67 -4,250,191.67 0.00 08/01/2005SEC ID:313397JW2BROKER: 3/15/2005 MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC, 3/15/2005 NYOCSF07522202: LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 3/17/2005 99.9931 1,600,000.000 1,599,889.33 -1,599,889.33 0.00 03/18/2005SEC ID:313589DEOBROKER: 3/17/2005 GOLDMAN SACHS&CO, NYOCSF07511102: 3/17/2005 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC NT MAT 3/2/2005 99.2884 800,000.000 794,307.44 -794,307.44 0.00 06/01/2005SEC ID:313589GHOBROKER 3/2/2005 CITIGROUP GBL MKTS/SALOMON, NEW 3/2/2005 YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- PIMCO B FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 3/9/2005 99.1200 10,100,000.000 10,011,120.00 -10,011,120.00 0.00 06/27/2005SEC ID: 313589HK2BROKER 3/9/2005 BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN 3/9/2005 FRANCISCOOCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 3/30/2005 99.2518 1,000,000.000 992,517.78 -992,517.78 0.00 06/29/2005SEC ID:313589HM8BROKER 3/30/2005 CHASE SECURITIES, NEW 3/30/2005 YORKOCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISC 3/14/2005 98.8462 1,000,000.000 988,461.67 -988,461.67 0.00 08/01/2005SEC ID:313589JW4BROKER 3/16/2005 GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NYOCSF07511102: 3/14/2005 LIQUID OPER-FIMCO Workbench 'Actual Settle Date 2 ................... ............."..'...................................... Transaction Detail Report W: LWA09 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currener 1181) 0C8D430Jfl1CkUDAT=-CM38CWM 10000 3/1/2005 - 3/31/2005 Statm:FINAL Trade Date Local Price Tran Settle Date Base Price cost Amount Net Gain/Loss TYPe Description Reported Date Base Ex Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base • FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 3/10/2005 98.7459 10,000,000.000 9,874,586.11 -9,874,586.11 0.00 08/08/2005SEC ID:313589KD4BROKEP- 3/10/2005 GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NYOCSF07522202: 3/10/2005 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO • U S TREASURY BILL DUE 04/14/2005 DD 3/17/2005 99.7958 3,800,000.000 3,792,241.67 -3,792,241.67 0.00 10/14/2004SEC ID: 9 12795SJ1 BROKER. 3/17/200S MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SMITH INC 3/17/2005 NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO • U S TREASURY BILL DUE 03/15/2005 DD 3/3/2005 99.9183 2,000,000.000 1,998,365.33 -1,998,365.33 0.00 03/03/2005SEC ID:912795TJOBROKER. 3/3/2005 MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SMITH INC 3/3/2005 NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO • U S TREASURY BILL DUE 07/21/2005 DD 3/2/2005 98.9002 7,000,000.000 6,923,014.00 -6,923,014.00 0.00 01/20/2005SEC ID:912795VH1BROKEP- 3/2/2005 UBS SECURITIES LLC, 3/2/2005 STAMFORDOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- PIMCO • U S TREASURY BILL DUE 09/15/2005 DD 3/14/2005 98.4833 35,000,000.000 34,469,166.67 -34,469,166.67 0.00 03/17/20005SEC ID:912795VR9BROKER. 3/17/2005 C171GROUP GBL MKTS/SALOMON, NEW 3/14/2005 YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- PIMCO • WELLS FARGO BANK NA INSTL C/D 2.790% 3/30/2005 100.0000 1,600,000.000 1,600,000.00 -1,600,000.00 0.00 04/13/2005 DD 03/31/05SEC ID: 3/31/2005 9497P2FT9BROKER,WELLS FARGO 3/30/2005 BROKERAGE SVCS LLC, MINNEAPOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- • EMAN CAT I REPO REPO 02.460P/. 3/l/2005 100.0000 200,000.000 200,000.00 -200,000.00 0.00 03/02/2005 DD 03/01/05SEC ID: 3/l/2005 99432D86 I BROKER LEHMAN GOVT SECS 3/l/2005 INC, NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- PIMCO • LEHMAN CAT 1 REPO REPO 02.420% 3/l/2005 100.0000 13,000,000.000 13,000,000.00 13,000,000.00 0.00 03/02/2005 DD 03/01/05SEC ID: 3/l/2005 99432F,083BROKEI;L- LEHMAN GOVT SECS 3/l/2005 INC, NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO Workbench Actual Settle Date 3 �Q aT�laS Tg�vV t�uaghl�vm SOOZ/OT/E 0Z)Wld-Had0 Q[n0lT :ZOI I ISLOSSOOAN 'ONI SOOZ/OI/£ SOBS.IA00 NVWHZ'I -dHXO EISZIbZ66£tb Ql Dabso/ol/co Ga SOQZ/T T/EO 00'0 00'OOO'OOS`OI- OO'QOO'OOS'OI O00'000'OOS'OT 0000'OOI SOOZ/Ol/E %OTS'ZO OdSH OdHH i .IVO NVMiZ'I a 00wid-Hado Yi2Is.I SOOZ/OI/E VNO'I :ZOZZZSL03SOOA N'd[HOO NOJ SOH SOOZ/OI/E .LSHLI ZSSIfIS,IIQZ2IO -daI0HHZL8dZEb66 QlO8SS0/OT/£0 au SOOZ/II/EO 00'0 00'000'006'S- 00'000'006'S 000'QOO'006'S 0000'OO1 SOOZ/OI/E %09VZO OdaH EIA ISSUIS.IIQHHIO H SOOZ/6/£. 0OWId-Wad0 Y1 SI ONO'I ZOZZZSL0dsoOAN 'ONI SOBS.LAOO NVYiHZ'I SOOZ/6/E' 2IaX0lISbSSNZEt,66:QI OESSO/60/£0 QQ 00'0 00'000'QOL'SL- 00'OOO'OOL'SZ QQO'000'OOL'SZ 0000'OOI 9006/6/E SOOZ/QT/£0%OEb'ZO OdaH Z.LVO NVINHH'I H SQOZ/6/£OOY1IId-2Isd0 airiO I :ZOT I ISLO.dsoom'ONI SQOZ/6/E S03S.LAOJ NVINHH'I -dHXO EII ZSNZ£t,66 QI O8SS0/60/£0 QQ SOOZ/OI/EO 00'0 00'000'QOS'OT- 00'000'O0S'OI QOO'000'OOS'OI 0000'OOI SOOZ/6/E 0/609VZO OcISH OdaH I LV)NVINHa I S SOOZ/8/E. oowld-,Hzd0 alfIbI'I ZOI I ISLOdSOOAN 'ONI SMS.LAOD NVWHZ'I SOOZ/S/£: dZX0 ISOE8'IZ£t,66:QI OSSSO/80/EO QQ QO'O OO"OOObO6'S- 00'000'006'S 000'000'006'5; 0000'OOI SOOZ/8/E SOOZ/6O/£0%OEb'ZO OdHH Z.LVO NVTNHZ'I H $OOZ/L/E OOYNId-2IHd0 QIf1bI I :ZQI I ISL03SOOAN '0NI S S00Z/L/£ OZS.LAOJ NVWH�'I-daX0 TSZ6S?IZ£b66 QI OSSSO/LO/EO ca SOOZ/SO/£0 00'0 OO'000'OQ6`S- 00'000'006'9 OOO'OOO'Q06'S 0000'0OI SOOZ/L/E 0/o09b'ZO OdSH OdSH I .IVO NVYITHTI H OOINId-HZdO SOOZ/b/E QInbri 'ZOI I ISLOSSOOA N'cM00 NO.ISOH SOOZ/b/E isaid SSSIIIS.IIQa2 o 2TaIO2IHbfLO Z£t,66 QI OSSSO/b0/EO QQ SOOZ/LO/£0 00'0 00'000'006'9- 00'000'006'9 000'00O'006'S 0000*001 SOOZ/b/E %OZb'ZO Wax 2d sssins JAISHO H 900Z/£/E. OONIId-HSdO alnbl'I SOOZ/£/E*ZOI I ISG03SOOAN 'ONI SOBS.LAOO NVYiHS'I -daX0HS868OZEb66 -'QI O2S53O/£0/£0 TIC 00'0 OO'OOO'006'E- 00'000'006'E 000'000'006'£ 0000'00I 9006/£/E 5;OOZ/b0/EO%09b'ZO OdHX Z.LVO NVYIIHZ'I s ama axeg axeg Zd/sozuRS a4va 2m mms a;ua Pa;lodam uopduasaa adAl goo'I/apD lax ;unotuv ;900 amid 0899 a;BQ OF4409 UWL aai=d r000'I a;BQ DPW L .. .._.. . -- ........................._ _.._____ _. - 'ivxij : ems 900Z/TE/8 - Soot/i/E 0000100OO930'Qut asn :Aauauna*=a 6joaa;8o uollovmwl Aq papodag 6ovema :al yodwa os;aQ U01:10 MW L _.................... . ............ ..... ..........................._..................................... Transaction Detail Report m: »AW Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD ocaeD c�oHsor raa2=-ocS000010000 3/1/2005 - 3/31/2005 Status:FINAL Trade Date Local Price -- - -- - -- T Settle Date Base Price Cost Amount Net(lain/Loss TYPe Description Reported Date Base Ex Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 02.470%03/14/2005 3/l 1/2005 100.0000 10,500,000.000 10,500,000.00 -10,500,000.00 0.00 DD 03/11/05SEC ID:99432RO76BROKER- 3/11/2005 LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511 102:3/I 1/2005 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B LEHMAN CAT 1 REPO REPO 02.500% 3/14/2005 100.0000 10,500,000.000 10,500,000.00 -10,500,000.00 0.00 03/15/2005 DD 03/14/05SECID: 3/14/2005 99432S645BROKER: LEHMAN GOVT SECS 3/14/2005 INC, NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B LEHMAN CAT l REPO REPO 02.580% 3/15/2005 100.0000 10,000,000.000 10,000,000.00 -10,000,000.00 0.00 03/16/2005 DD 03/15/O5SECID: 3/15/2005 99432U244BROKER: LEHMAN GOVT SECS 3/15/2005 INC, NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 02.5800/6 3/15/2005 100.0000 1,600,000.000 1,600,000.00 -1,600,000.00 0.00 03/16/2005 DD 03/1 5/05SEC ID: 3/15/2005 99432U293BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 3/15/2005 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 02.5500/a 3/17/2005 100.0000 13,000,000.000 13,000,000-00 -13,000,000.00 0.00 03/18/2005 DD 03/17/05SECID: 3/17/2005 99432X289BROKER CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 3/17/2005 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 02.630%03/21/2005 3/18/2005 100-0000 12,000,000.000 12,000,000.00 -12,000,000.00 0.00 DD 03/18/05SEC ID:99432Y840BROKER 3/18/2005 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102:3/18/2005 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 02.650% 3/21/2005 100.0000 11,900,000.000 11,900,000.00 -11,900,000.00 0.00 03/22/2005 DD 03/21/05SECID: 3/21/2005 99433A163BROKER- CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 3/21/2005 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 02.6100/6 3/22/2005 100-0000 10,000,000.000 10,000,000.00 -10,000,000.00 0.00 03/23/2005 DD 03/22/05SECID: 3/22/2005 99433B849BROKER. CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 3/22/2005 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO Workbench *Actual Settle Date 5 __................ ...__...__. ..... — . _.... -—...... _..._ _ _.. .__ ..... -- Transaction Detail Report m: EWBAM Reported by Transaction Category Baw Currency: 1181) 0C8n4o11fls0zM&TM-008000010000 3/1/2005- 3/31/2005 Status:FINAL Trade Date Local Price Tian Settle Date Base Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Lose TYPe Description Reported Date Base ER Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 02.590%03/24/2005 3/23/2005 100.0000 7,400,000.000 7,400,000.00 -7,400,000.00 0.00 DD 03/23/05SEC ID: 99433D472BROKER: 3/23/2005 LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102:3/23/2005 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 02.580% 3/24/2005 100.0000 11,400,000.000 11,400,000.00 -11,400,000.00 0.00 03/28/2005 DD 03/24/05SECID: 3/24/2005 99433E736BROKER. CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 3/24/2005 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 02.7000/a 3/28/2005 100.0000 11,400,000.000 11,400,000.00 -11,400,000.00 0.00 03/29/2005 DD 03/28/05SECID: 3/28/2005 99433G2IOBROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 3/28/2005 BOSTON CORP, N YOCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 02.660%03/30/2005 3/29/2005 100.0000 11,400,000.000 11,400,000.00 -11,400,000.00 0.00 DD 03/29/05SEC 1D:99433H952BROKER: 3/29/2005 LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102:3/29/2005 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B LEHMAN CAT 1 REPO REPO 02.630% 3/30/2005 100.0000 10,400,000.000 10,400,000.00 -10,400,000.00 0.00 03/31/2005 DD 03/30/05SECID: 3/30/2005 99433KI20BROKER LEHMAN GOUT SECS 3/30/2005 INC, NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B LEHMAN CAT 1 REPO REPO 02.630% 3/31/2005 100.0000 8,000,000.000 8,000,000.00 -8,000,000.00 0.00 04/01/2005 DD 03/31/05SEC ID: 3/31/2005 99433L698BROKER: LEHMAN GOVT SECS 3/31/2005 INC,NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 3/1/2005 1.0000 118,287.270 118,287.27 -118,287.27 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONGTERM 3/1/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/1/2005 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 3/2/2005 1.0000 212,097.390 212,097.39 -212,097.39 0.00 9960852470CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 3/2/2005 PIMCO 3/2/2005 Workbench 'Actual Settle Date 6 2WQ OT-WS TOMW 'rJua43f-'aA1 SOOZ/SI/£ OOYNId SOOZ/SI/£ -ZI3dOQIrIOI'I :60111SLOH83OLKS80966 00'0 t�8'S6Z`i00`£- b8'26Z`I00`£ Ob8'S6Z`I00`£ 0000'I SOOZ/SI/£ :GI OHSJME)YNHSVOAZIf1SVaa.LsndAzaa H SOOZ/,I/£ COyNICI SOOZ/bi/£ -gzdO(IIfIaI'I :ZOIIISL0isoo/t,ZS80966 00'0 $Z'I9i'Z SZ'I9I`Z OSZ'i9i`Z O000'i SOOZ/bI/£ :QIOSSIYgi)LRHSV3AUnSVZHJ,SfL AMG g SOOZ/I I/£ 031NId SOOZ/II/£ -gSdo cmOn :ZOIIISL03SOOLbZS80966 00'0 80'Z£L- 80'Z£L 080'Z£L 0000'I SOOZ/I I/£ :Qi OHSJMDYN HSVO AHnSVaH.L SfIAAZH(I S S00Z/OI/£ OOYNId SOOZ/01/£ -gHdo ciinOrI :ZOI i ISLO,dSOOLKS80966 00'0 OS'LIL- OS'LIL OOS'LIL 0000'I SOOZ/OI/£ :Ql OHS MOIN HSVO AHnSVaSl SfIAAZH(I H SOOZ/6/£ OOIRId SOOZ/6/£ -ZIHdouifibn:ZOIIISLOASOOLtZS80966 00'0 Lb'8*,L`II- Lb'8bL`II 0,4votL`II 0000'I SOOZ/6/£ :QIOHSMDYN HSVO AZMSVHZI,LSndAZH(I S SOOZ/8/£ OOYNid SOOZ/8/£ -HadO ainblI:ZOI I ISLUSOOLVM90966 00'0 LI'£Ob- LI'£0b OLI'£Ob 0000'I SOOZ/8/£ :QI OHS,LYNOW HSVO AZIf1SVHZi.L Sfi3ASHU a SOOZ/L/£ OOYNId SOOZ/L/£ -ZIHdo CIMOIl :ZOI I ISLOASOOLbZS80966 00'0 ES'68I`I- £8'68I`1 0£8'68I`1 00001 SOOZ/L/£ :QIOSS,Li OWHSVOAZIf1SVHZI.LSndAHMU S SOOZ/b/£ OOYNId SOOZ/b/£ -ZIHdo airiOn :ZOi i ISLoasooLbZSS0966 GOV OS'99Z- O9'99Z OOS'99Z 00001 SOOZ/b/£ :aI OSSJMDYN HSVO ANnSVHZLL SnaAZHU H MMIK assg mmil ji�d/sazvg8 agli ZZ MMff a;sQ papodog uol;dFimaa adAl 880VU113D lax ;unoum ;900 aa[id ages a;BQ OrPas UW.L aa[=d [wool a;BQ apwj. .... __. . -- _._ ....... zvsc a=�u�s SOO V I S/E - SOOZ/I/E OOOOT O000soo-azz o"soo asa :a=wmo mms Azo4a;sa uol:lomms.=y Aq papodag 6ovema :� � u1nou u013073suwl _ . ..... .----.... _._.... ... ..... .. . . ............_ . . .. Transaction Detail Report W. EWBAo9 Reported by Transaction Category Base cur .eney: tlan oc�acolHsor r 2w-OC80OW10000 3/1/2005 - 3/31/2005 status: FINAL. ......... _ _ Trade Date Local Price Tran Settle Date Base Price Cost Amount Net(lain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Ex Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 3/15/2005 1.0000 259,311.080 259,311.08 -259,311.08 0.00 996085247OCSF07522202:LONG TERM 3/15/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/15/2005 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 3/16/2005 1.0000 19,418,332.080 19,418,332.08 -19,418,332.08 0.00 9960852470CSF0751 1102:LIQUID OPER- 3/16/2005 PIMCO 3/16/2005 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 3/18/2005 1.0000 1,913,286.330 1,913,286.33 -1,913,286.33 0.00 996085247OCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 3/18/2005 PIMCO 3/18/2005 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 3/21/2005 1.0000 102,630.000 102,630.00 -102,630.00 0.00 996085247OCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 3/21/2005 PIMCO 3/21/2005 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 3/21/2005 1.0000 85,289.010 85,289.01 -85,289.01 0.00 996085247OCSF07S22202: LONG TERM 3/21/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/21/2005 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 3/22/2005 1.0000 210,954.690 210,954.69 -210,954.69 0.00 996085247OCSF07522202: LONGTERM 3/22/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/22/2005 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 3/23/2005 1.0000 11,910.560 11,910.56 -11,910.56 0.00 996085247OCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 3/23/2005 PIMCO 3/23/2005 H DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 3/24/2005 1.0000 65,333.380 65,333.38 -65,333.38 0.00 996085247OCSF07522202: LONG TERM 3/24/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/24/2005 Workbench 'Actual Settle Date 8 6 aIBQ awas lumov f zpuaq�a0ZA SOOZ/0£/£ 00wid_EadO SOOZ/0£/E MZI ONIO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOb6OL80966 00'0 SS'[LI'I£- 88'ILI'I£ 089*1LI'I£ 00001 SOOZ/0£/£ :QIOSS.LOOV.LISOdSQASNowz,LdI-ZQSS H SOOZ/8Z/£ OOINId-HadO SOOZ/8Z/E WHZI ONIO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOt760L80966 00'0 £I'969'9- £I'5;69'9 0£I'969'9 0000'I SOOZ/8Z/£ :Q1 DasioOV IlsodSQ AMOIN S.LV'I-.LASH H SOOZ/i£/£ OOINId-Hado SOOZ/I£/£ WHHI,ONIo'I ZOZZZSLOASOOLKS80966 00'0 SL'OLS'86- SL'OLS'86 OSL'OL8'86 00001 SOOZ/IE/£ :Ql DZS.MUW HSVO A-anSVZS.L SndAZHG H SOOZ/I£/£ 00wld SOOZ/I£/£ -2IZdOQIf1011 :ZOIIISLOASOOLKS80966 00'0 £0't,99'66L- EO'bSS'66L OE01799'66L 00001 SOOZ/I£/£ =QlOSSJMIDWHSVO UMSVZH.LSflaL?ZHa H S00Z/0£/£ ooygld 90OZ/0£/£ -aad0 QLnbiI :ZOI I ISLOdSOOLKS80966 00'0 SS'n£'8- SS'bZ£'8 OSS'bZ£'8 OOOO'l SOOZ/0£/£ :QI OSS,LWDW HSHO UMgVHHd.SndAaH(I H SOOZ/6Z/£ OOINId SOOZ/6Z/£ -2IZdO Qlflbl'I:ZOI I ISLOASOOLKS80966 00'0 00'SS8- 00'SS8 OOO'SS8 0000'I SOOZ/6Z/E :QI OZS, WDW HSVO AHnSd'32LL WMAMI H SOONSV E 00yQld-mzdO S00Z/8Z/E MZI OHOZ :ZOZ MOdSOOLKS80966 00'0 Z6'ZSZ'EtZ- Z6'Z8Z'£t Z; OZ6'Z8Z'£bZ 0000'I SOOZ/SZ/£ :QI 03SJd O N HSVD AHf1SVaH L SndAaHa H SOOZ/We OOINId SOOZ/t?Z/£ -HadO QInbII :ZOI I ISL03SOOLKS80966 00'0 6£'Z£S'000'b- 6£'ZES'000't, 06£'Z£S'000'b OQ00'I SOOZ/t�Z/£ :QI OZS,LW N HSVO A2if1SdaHL sndAH2IQ H assg assg aseg Zvd/sajvIs a;8g zz saes aqua pavodsm uopdpwaa add,L 8801I/um fax Inuoum 4903 W-Wd awl[ 248Q OP429 UVIL Gosd Pot" aqua QPW L zvxi a :�u�s SOOZ/i E/S - 300Z/T/E 00001000O800-assvarroomo"soo asn :a=Wmo ama 6zo2a;8a uol;ommw L Aq papodag wvam M uodgu HVIOG U01:10 suW L • 0[ owu or-pas ien3aV. yauagXaom ODY1Ild SOOZ/OI/E -HadO MHI DNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSDOAN`ONI SOOZ/£i A, SDHS IAOD NVYNHH'I?IHXOHE16t9ZSOd 10 =QI DHSSO/IQ/t0 QQ SEOZ/l0/t0 00'0 00'0SZ'I00'i- 00'0SZ'i 00'I 000'000'000'i OSZ I'00I SOOZ/QI/E 0/000S'S Dim as vm4d and OJ.J.WIYQOD H ODYQId SOOZ/OI/£ -HHdO YIRIHJ,ONO'I :ZOZZZSL03SDOAN '00 SOOZ/£I/t V SHDVS NVWG'IOD daXO2IH6t9ZSOdIO =QI DHSSO/1040 au SEOZ/I0/t0 00'0 ZI'8LS`600'£- ZI'8LS'ZQO`£ 000'000`000'£ 6S80'00I SOOZ/OI/£ %OOS'S DJM 3S VPINA 2lfid OI J,HMOO a OOINId-UHdO SOOZ/Si/£ YNHH'LDNO'i •ZOZZZSLOdSDOaHOA HVJS SOOZ/LI/S 'DZZ SHLLRIfoss SHfi 2IH�IO2ISZStOSOdIO QIDHStO/10/SO QQ 6IOZ/IO/SO 00'0 SL'8IL'966'Z- SL'8IL'966'Z 000'OOo'000`£ 9068'66 SOOZ/Sl/E %000-S OJA dS VYQNd Zlfid 0110OV03 S ODWId-HSdO SOOZ/OI/£ YIRIHJ.DN0'I •ZOZZZSLOdSOOC[HOzll VJS SOOZ/8[/t ,om saumfiDHS SSII-dzxo2IHSi;+osoAI0 -QI DHSSO/IO/t0 au OZOZ/IO/to GOV OO'QOO`000`£- 00'000`000'£ 000'000'000`£ 0000'00I SOQZ/OI/£ 0/0000'S Dim d8 VWNd 2lfld OJ,J.HgWOD H OOINId-Zl3dO SOOZ/OI/£ YIHZIONO'I 'ZOZZZSL03SDOC[HO4IIVJS SQOZ/8[/� 'DZZ SHLLRMDHS SHfi 2IHXOHSSttOSOd10 QIDHSSO/I0/t0 QQ OZOZ/IO/t0 00'0 00*000'0017'I I- 00'000'OOb'I I 000'000`00t'I I 0000'00I SQOZ/Ol/£ %Ooo'S ULW,dS VYMA Hnd OJ•ILMOD S O3Y9Id-2IHdO SOOZ/I/E I HSI DNO'I -ZOZZZSLOdSOONHOA MaN`ONI SOOZ/LI/E 'IVJddVD SAV'IDHVH--daMOHEUCtOSOd10 QI oasso/to/co QQ ozozho/co 00'0 SZ'9S9'LOS- SZ'9S9'LOS 000'000'00S EI£S"I OI SOoZ/I I/Z "/0000'S D.Lw qS VWN3 2Ifid Ol JdN WOO H xvzzoa s n swil m3as MWONi GaXid 00.0 LO•188`86ti'OL£- L0188`866`OLS 080•S£t6`803`TL£ :ggdg 8J:1 a ivAInbH HSvD v HSdO'IViob 00.0 LO•T88'86b'OL£- L0•T88'86b'OLE O80.8£S'80S`iLS -IM IOCI•871 8JNRWAMOZ HBVD 19 HSVO'IVJ.O,L aims *Bus aims led/gajegg alum zz arms alma pa:pOdva II014dKosaQ eddy as ales nua a wag ssoZ/�eD 3aN ;uno�1 4�'J ups aalsd i*'I a;ea OPWI __.......... __ .... ........ - ......._..... ........ . INNI'd :Mqu4s soot/i E/E - SOOZ/i/E OOWT OOODSW-amvI[tl7C4bT11TOr?QBOO asn :Aouauno own 6ioNaisa uol;assuwj, Aq papodag 60VUM :M 4304wd ITBTaQ uoPas MWI ......_..__..__....... .....-_........... --- ..___._.... -----............... ... . .... .. - ........ _.. .... _. ... -_.... ...._ ..__ .........._._._. ................... ............._...... .. .......... ... T T wuu umas tames. xpuagXaoAl s S00Z/[/b O0Y1iId SO06/8/£ 2ISd0 NI2I21 ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOASOOAN`00 SOOZ/L[/£ W SHOW NVY1ia'l09:HHx0sEl£XIHVOOi7IE a[02iSE0/TO/to au SI OZ/I0/I0 00'O b8'915- 00'0 000'0 99ZL'OOI 9006/8/£ %OOO'S tLL1890#'I00d VWNA Ell .SOOZ/[/b O0vgld SOOZ/8/E -2Idd0 YH2IS.L ONO'I:ZOZZZSL03SOOAN`OO SOOZ/LT/£ V SHOVS NVWG'100-dHX0 EIV`G VOOi7T£ QI OSS£0/10/10 QQ 8IOZ/10/10 00'0 LS'69Z'b£Z- LS'69Z't£Z ObL'6LS`ZEZ 99ZL'00[ SOOZ/8/E %OOO'S i7LLI890#'I00d VWN3 El .SOOZ/I/b O0wid SO06/8/E 2INd0 Mai JNO'I:ZOZZZSL0ds0OAN'00 SOOZ/LT/E TSHOVSNVWU'IO—HHX0?IEl£?[NIVOOb i£ =aI OSSEO/I0/to QQ SI OZ/to/to OO'0 bb'ZZZ'Z- OO'O 000'0 99ZL'OOI S00Z/8/E %000'S tLL1890#'100d V1NNd Ell SOOZ/l/b 00wid SOOZ/8/E 2INd0 M2.1,UNO'i=ZOZZZSLOdSOOAN'00 SOOZ/LI/£ T SHOVS NVNia'IODZIa)IOUSE-jaIIVOOb[V al 0SSE0/I O/I O QQ 8[OZ/I O/T O O0'O IO'99£'L00'I- TO'99E'L00'I 099'660`000'I 99ZL'OOI SO06/8/£ %000'S tLL1890#1I00d VwNd El SOOZ/I/b O0WId SOOZ/8/E -2INdO MZ.L'DNO'I=ZOZZZSL0ASOOAN `00 SOOZ/LI/£ 19 SHOW NVY'Qa'I0O--daX0HS8gAUI6£i£ =al OHSZO/T O/Z I as 810Z/I O/I O 00'0 [Z'O£8'i- 00'0 000'0 99ZL'001 S006/8/£ 0/6000'S IS99L9O#'I00d VINNd Ell :SOOT,/1/b OOYQid SOOZ/8/E -2ISd0 M:Ell'DN(YI :ZOZZZSLoAm0AN'00 S00Z/LT/£ T SHOVS NVY1Ia'IOD--dHX02IH8'IAUI6£IE aIOSSZO/IO/ZI aa8i0Z/TO/10 00'0 ZE'9LS'6Z8- ZE'9LS'6Z8 Oib'Z6S'EZ8 99ZL'OOI SOOZ/8/£ 0/6000'S TS99L90#'I00d VWNA El 0DWId-2I3dO 9006/L I/EQInOri •Z01 T ISL03SOOOOSIONvmA NVS'ailI oas vz)ma v dO ONVEl=2121310HEISa'IAOS090 SOOZ/ZZ/£ :(It OSSSO/LO/ZO as SOOZ/80/80 00'0 L9'160'9- 00'0 000'0 OL66'66 SOOZ/L1/EJ.212IVA SSZ002I.L#SHONVU.1,V N HZYQV?INVEl Ell O3YHId-2ISdO SOOZ/L[/£ainOn :ZOT I I SLO.3SOOOOSIzw"a NVs'O'I'I 08S VORISYHV AO ONVEl-daXONEWYIAOS090 SOOZ/ZZ/£ aT 0ZSSO/LO/ZO as SOOZ/80/80 OO'0 OZ"0b6`666'[- OZ'Ob6'666`1 000'000`000'Z OL66'66 SOOZ/L I/EJ.2I 2TVA SSZOOSJ,#aTi0NV-d.L V N 2I3YHV XNVEl El agog asag asag sad/sazugg a;ag NZ MMS a;aa papodag uoj:jdjzasaQ ad6y ssoZ/upm 48g ;unouiV 4900 "Tzd agog a;aQ ama8 uasy solid I�a'I a;aQ apass, _ ....... .................... ................................... .. . .......... ...... . _...._....._ __. ... zvxij:m 3lqs SOOZ/i£/E - SOOZ/t/E 00001 o00DsDo-aaLvorros o"Soo ass :AOII' mo aws Bso$a;sC) uopowmwj, Bq papodag Govem .cU:P0dQH OsgaQ uoPasSUML .. ....._....__.._......._.... .. .... .... ..... .. .. .............._._. . ............. ... .... zc 27Ua arias TMaaV. yauEpq*ivM OOY1ild SOOZ/8/£ -2ISd0 MS.L ONO'I :ZOZZZSL03SOOAN 'ONI SOOZ/LT/£ SDSSJAODNVWHS'I-dHX02IH6nn(ISObI£ al OSSi7O/I O/LO QQ 61 OZ/I O/LO 00'0 86*61I'I- 00'O 000'0 i+£L'001 SOOZ/8/E %OQO'S S6£98LO#'I00d VYgNd Ell OOYRId S00Z/8/£ HHdO Mal ONOT ZOZZZSL03SDOAN'DNI SOOZ/LI/£ S0SSJAODNVIKHS' -daMOUE16fla(ISObI£ =al OSS17O/[O/LO QQ 6I OZ/IO/LO 00'O Lb'069'LOS- Lb'069'LOS OO£'686'£OS bb£L'o01 SOOZ/8/£ 9/6000'S S6£98LO#'I00d VYgNd H OOYHId SQQZ/8/£ -HadO MS,L ONO'I=ZOZZZSLOgSDOAN`ONI soot/LI/£ SOSS,LAOD NVWHS'I ZTSX0HSSEIISSOb[£ aI OSSb0/IO/oI as 61OZ/10/0[ QO'0 £I'61I'I 00'0 000'0 "EL-001 SOOZ/8/E 1/10000"S OSZb8L0#'IOOd Wald at OOINid s00Z/8/E HadO YMSL ONO'I :ZQZZZSLOdSDOAN 'ONI SOOZ/LI/£ SOSS JAOD NVWHS'I ZISX0WG8£HHSObi£ atOHSb0/TO/01 QQ 610Z/10/01 00'0 Sb'90£'LOs- Sb'90£'Los 080'809'£os bb£L'OOI SOOZ/S/E %OOO'S OSZbSLO#'IOOd VWNd H ODWId Sow/8/£ -2IHdO MS.L ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOSSDOAN'ONI SQOZ/LT/£ ROSS JA00 NVYITHS'I--daX02IH6W0VSObI£ =aI 351SVO/10/01 QQ 6IOZ/I0/01 00'0 b0'LOI'I- 00'O 000'O tib£L'o0[ SOOZ/8/£ %OQO'S 1170££8LO#100cl VYqN,d HI OOYNId Soot/8/£ -HSd0 MEL ONO'I -ZOZZZSLO.dSDOAN 'ONI SOOZ/LT/£ SDSS.LAOONVYIIHS'l-daIO2IH6NTOVSOi7IE aI OHSbo/IO/OI as 6I OZ/10/01 00'0 O5;'8Z8'IOS- OS'8Z8'[OS 090'04I'86t, bbEL'OO[ SOOZ/8/E %000'S VOEE840#1OOd VD1TNd H a SOOZ/I/tb OOYgId SOOZ/S/E -2ISdO Y1 Hal ONO'I -ZOZZZ9L0dM0AN '00 SOOZ/LI/E V SHOVS NVWa'IOO-daX02II3£XKVOObIE aI OSSEO/10/10 as 81 OZ/10/10 00'0 bZ'Z6£- 00'0 000'0 99ZL'QOI S006/8/E %QOO'S 17LL[890#'I00d VNTN.d HI .SOOZ/1/b OOYqId SOOZ/8/£ NEW Y1 EI DNO'I :ZOZZZSL03SDOAN'00 SoOZ/LI/£ V SHOVS NVW(I'IOD 2ISgO2IS£)aWOOb[£ aIOSS£0/to/Io as SIOZ/I0/10 00'0 b8'68L'LLI- b8'68L'LLI 0Ob'LOS'941 99ZL'00[ S006/8/£ 0/6000'S bLL[890#'I00d VNINd H a�g MMS aosg jud/sa=Bw awa 2m a=a 'awa Pavoda2i uopduasa(l eddy 88011/al$o 40N :junourV 4800 Valid ase8 s;Ba Op;ag QBsy solid Moll a;ua apa=y SOOZ/TS/E - SQOZ/1/E 000010000800-QEZYM aen svuouna ayes 6ao4a3sC) uop*i3suw L dq papodag e Vg= =az:podoM �B;aQ uo��assasiy E I �a auras iB1uov x t{vuagjjoAl OOWId S00Z/8/£ -62clo WHZI ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOASOOAN 'ONI S00Z/LI/£ SOSSJAODNVWHS'I-d'aXOHS6XONSOi7I£ QI OaSSO/IO/T0 QQ OZOZ/IO/ZO O0'0 9b'ZO1'I- 00'0 000'0 "U'QOI SQOZ/8/£ 0/6000'9 bL6£6LO#'I00d VWN,d fit OOWId SOOZ/8/£ -2I2d0 Y1 &L ONO'I:ZOZZZSLO.dSOOAN 'ONI S00Z/L[/£ �S lAOD NIP Mia'I ZIS3101186?IONSOV I£ QI DESSO/I0/TO QQ 0Z0Z/IO/Z0 00'0 S9'8bL'66b- S9'SVL'66b 08£'SOI'9617 "ECOOI 2006/8/£ 0/6000'S i7L6E6LO#'IOOd VWN3 E OOW Id SOOZ/8/£ -2IXdO W2IX.L DNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOAN'ONI S00Z/LT/£ SOSSJAOONVWHS'I -HZXOH9609XSObT£ :(If 33blW/I0/0I QQ 6IQZ/10/0I 00'0 Lb'SII'l- 00'0 000'0 bb£L'OOI SOOZ/8/£ %000'S 6LOZ6LO#'IOOd VWN3 HI OOW Id SOOZ/8/£ 2ISdO Y1 HZI ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOAN'ONI SOOZ/LI/£ SOBSJAODNVWH3'I ZIN?IO2IS6b9Xb SOI£ Q[OSSbO/TO/QI QQ 6I OZ/IO/01 00'0 £S'Sb9'SOS- £S'Sb9'SQS QSZ'Z96'IOS bb£L'OOI SOOZ/S/£ %000'S 6LOZ6LO#'I00d VWNd H MINId SOOZ/8/E 2ISdO M21 ONO'I :ZOZZZSL03SOOAN 'ONI SKM -d SOOZ/LI/£ S,LAOD NVWHal a IOHSON2IHSOb IV QIOXSbO/TO/01 QQ6TOZ/IO/OI 00'0 L6'09I'I- 00'0 000'0 bb£L'QOI SOOZ/8/£ 0/6000'S £6868LO#'I00d VWN3 at OOINId SOOZ/8/£ NSdO WH21 DNO'I :ZOZZZSL03SOOAN 'ONI SOOZ/LI/£ � I£ SJAODNVYiHWIZI�IO2ISON2IHSOb Q[DaSb0/I0/0I QQ 61 OZ/10/01 QO'0 LO'SEL'IZS- LO'8£L'IZS 08b'b£6'419 bb£L'OOI SQOZ/8/£ 0/6000'S £6868LO#'IOOd VWN3 H OOW Id S00Z/8/£ -sad0 Your DNO'I :ZOZZZSL03SOOAN 'ONI SOQZ/L[/£ SO3SJAODNVWH3 b'I--dHXOHH6bAOSOi£ atO8S60/IO/80 as 61OL/I0/80 OTO 96'£II'T- 0O'0 000'0 t+EL'OOI SOOZ/8/£ 0/6000'S S£I68LO#'IOOd VWN.d Ell OOWId S00Z/S/£ NSdO W2IS,L DNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOAN 'ONI SOOZ/LI/£ SOSS JAOD NVWHS'I-dHXOM96bA090t IE QI OSStbO/10/80 QQ 6 T OZ/I O/80 OO'0 68'£96'bO9- 68'£96'bOS 009'Z8Z'IOS "U'OOT SQOZ/8/E 0/6000'S S£I68LO#'I00d VWN3 S a�g assg alma "d/gwggs a;8g zd mmil a;BQ papodag uoi;dpasaa add Z 88011/um ION 4un0 v 3SO0 amid aseg a;$a OMOS UW L aai=d Pmn a38Q OPWs _ -_------_.... . _...._._.__ zvx�a� �s SOOZ/TE/E - sOOZ/T/E 00001 OOODBOO aaLvarlosmoolasoo asa :Smamo awe dio2a;sC) uollowmaij, Aq papodag 6ovems Paz uOdvg lls;aQ UORO MWs L • b I WUQ aPPS TBn7aH; �uagx�o� OOW Id S00Z/8/£ HSdO I4 HRL flNOT ZOZZZSL0ASDOAN'ONI SOOZ/L I/£ SOSS.LAOJ NTVLITHH'I-daXOHE1OHZASObi£ =TII OHSVO/I O/I T QQ 61 OZ/T 0/11 00'0 0b'STT'T- 00.0 000'0 "VL'OOT SOOZ/8/E 0/0000's 8£9£080#'IOOd VPUA HI OOWId s00Z/8/E 2IHdo Ymal ONO'I:ZOZZZSL03SOOAN`ON[ SQQZ/L[/£ SOHS,LAOO NVWHH'I -dHXOHE1OHZASObI£ QI OSSb0/T 0/T T QQ 6i OZ/T 0/[I 00'0 tesi9'SOs- ts'sT9'SOS 06L'6Z6'T09 "EL'001 SOOZ/8/£ 0/0000'S ME0 O#'IOOd vr*m H OOWTd s00Z/8/£ Hado Mal ON0'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOAN 'ONI S00Z/LT/£ SOSS,LAO'J NVWHS'I2iHXOHEICXNTASObiE aI OHSs0/TO/ZO QQ OZOZ/TQ/Z0 00'0 L6'90T'T- 00'0 000'0 t+VL'QO[ SOOZ/8/£ %000'S b6ZE0SO#'I00d VPMA HI OOW[d sOQZ/8/E -HSdo MZJ.ONO'I:ZOZZZSLOdSOOAN'ONI SOOZ/L T/£ SOHS,LAOO NiVWHH'I-dSXOHEICXNASOb[E OI oasso/TO/ZO QQ Qz0z/TO/z0 00'0 £6'96L'109- £6'96L'I09 ObL'L£I'86b "£L'00I SQOZ/8/E %OOO'S b6ZEOSO#'IOOd VYMa H OOWid SOOZ/8/E -"ado MS,L ONO'I :ZOZZZSL03SOOAN'ONI SOOZ/LT/£ SOHS,LAOJNVWHH'I -d3XO3HOFgEMSObIE OIoasv0/I0/II QQ6TOZ/T0/TT 00'0 [E'EOI'i- 00'0 000'0 "EL'00T SOOZ/8/£ %000•s "C66LO#'I00d VYMA HI OOW[d sOQZ/8/E HHdO W2TS,L ON0'I :ZOZZZ9L03SOOAN'ONI SOOZ/LI/£ SOES,LAO'a NIVWHaI ZiSXOHGOW8nG0t,I£ QI03Sb0/10/II QQ 6TQZ/TO/TT 00'0 b9'L£['009- bS'L£T'00s OEt'16b'96b "EL'OOT SOOZ/8/E %000'S tb£66LO#100d VWN,d H OOW Td s00z/8/E _HadO PMZ.L JNO'I:ZOZZZSLO,dSOOAN 'ONI SQOZ/LI/£ SONS,LAOJNVWHH'I-dHIO'89LMC090t,I£ QI OSSt O/IO/T I QQ 6IOZ/10/ZI 00'0 6E'SII'[- 00'0 000'0 "EL'001 s00z/8/E 0/0000's E8E96LO#'IOOd VWMA HT OOW[d s00Z/8/£ HZdO PMSl'ONO'I:ZOZZZSLOASOOAN'ONII S00Z/L I/E SOSS,LAOJ NTVWHS'I ?IHXOH9L'IXaSOb I£ QI OHSb0/T 0/11 QQ 61 QZ/T O/Z T 00'0 66'019'SOs- 66'019'909 086'bZ6'[OS t+EL'001 SOOz/8/E %000•S E8£96LO#'I00d VWNd H ai�sg aasg a�eg nd/4an48 aisg za mms area Pa:podws luol;dProsaQ addy ssa'I/UM;am ;unomY 3800 aolsd OWE DING QMOS sissy aai=d i$ao'I a;sQ apluZ SOOZ/i E/E - SQOZ/T/E 0000T0000830'agzvurromcx asao aim :A=ago owe 6xo2a;8o uojj*wmw L dq papodag 60YUM M:PDdatl �s;aQ i[o��assus�y SI OWU amps wrtlov �a4�1fDM 03YYId SOOZ/8/E 2I3d0 Mal DNO'I:ZOZZZSL03S30AN`DNI SOOZ/L I/E S33S,LA00 N VWH3I 2Ta)IGHEISBEMOb I£ (It 33SSQ/to/TO au OZOZ/to/IO 00'0 66*61I'I- 00'0 000'0 ttEL'QOI SOOZ/8/E %000'9 6t6I T80#100cl VWNd Ell 03wId SOOZ/8/E -HadO P03.L DNO'I:ZOZZZSL03S30AN'3NI SOOZ/LT/E SD'aS.LAODNVWH3'I -daMO2I88SEI90tI£ QI 3SSS0/I O/I O QQ OZOZ/I O/I O 00'O 96't69'LOS- 961769'LOS 09L'E66'EOS "U'QOI SOOZ/S/E %QOO'S 6t6I ISO#'IOOd VY1T M El 00ifild SOOZ/8/£ HadO Y'Q H1 DNO'I:ZOZZZSLO,3S30AN'3NI SOOZ/LT/£ S33S LAOD NVYIIH3'I 2I3}I0HEItZ;XD90tI£ :(II D38S0/T 0/10 as OZOZ/I O/ZO 00"0 90'LOI'I- 00'0 000'0 ttEL'QOI SOOZ/8/E %OOO'S £IS6080#'I00d VPDM at 03YYld SOOZ/8/£ -213dO M13.L DNO'I:ZQZZZSLO.dS30AN '3NI S00Z/L T/E S33S.LAOD NVY�II-IH'I-daX0HRtnD90t I E a133SS0/IO/IO Q(I OZOZ/IO/ZO 00'0 IZ'EES'IOS- IZ'EE8'IOS ObL'tLI'86t "EL'001 SOOZ/8/E 0/6000'S £IS6080#'I00d WiNd El OZ)Wld SOOZ/8/£ -2T3d0 WH31 ONO'I :ZQZZZSLO.dSDOAN'3NI SOOZ/LI/£ S33S LAODNIVWH3'I -daX0d8ZrMd90t7I£ QI D3SS0/IO/ZO a0:OZOZ/IO/£O 00'0 8t'80I'I- 00'0 000'0 "CL'OOI SOOZ/S/E 0/0000'S IL98080#1I00d vwNid at WWid SOOZ/8/£ 'd3dO M3.L ON0'I :ZQZZZSLO.dSDOANI'3NI SQQZ/LT/E SOSSJAOD NIVNIH3I -daX0HEIZ; WA90bI£ QI3aSS0/IO/ZO as OZOZ/TO/EO 00'0 5;L'64t'ZOS- SL'6m"ZOS 09S'919'86t ttEL'OOI SOOZ/8/£ 0/0000'S IL98080#100d VwN3 8 03Y1IId SOOZ/8/£ HadO Yr HH1 DNO'I :ZOZZZSLO.dS30AN 'DNI SQOZ/L[/E SOSSJAOONVWH3'I-dZX02I8t b 3H39OIE QI0aSt0/IO/ZI QQ 61OZ/IO/ZT 00'0 St'ILO`I- 00'O 000'0 "VL'OOI SOOZ/S/E 0/0000'5; £809080#100d VwNd at 00WId SOOZ/8/E -2I3d0 Y 511 DN0'I=ZOZZZSLOASDOAN'ONI SOOZ/LI/E SOSS.LAODNVYNH3I :HZX0dGt3H390t,I£ 3I33St0/I0/ZI Q(I 6TOZ/IO/ZI 00'O ES'SOL'S8t- ES'SOL'S8t OE9't91'ZSt "EL'OOI SOOZ/8/E 0/0000'S E809080#1I00d VwNd a asss aims aims - --sBd/samw a4vu za mms a;Ba papodau uopdpasaa adAL 8801/um lax 4unouiv loco voila aims a;ma auras UWL saKd Im"I awa spw L zvxc a:•was SOOZ/T E/E - SOOZ/T/£ 000010000wo-azzvammoDiffeao a$B :A*U=XUC)'wn 6iofa48a uopowmwy Aq papodag WVamm :ca uadws Hs}aa UORO sassy — .._.._ __ ..... ... . ---_.. .... .............._ _....... .. ....... _ __ 91 27UQ Qm;ps Tgt►7�V s zj=aq-yaojA OOY1ITd Sooz/S/£ -SadO Mal ONO'I:ZOZZZSL03SD0XN 'ONI S00Z/L I/£ SDHS J AOD NVYIIHS'I 2IHIOZIEI 1 ZTdR90V I E QT omSso/10/zo QQ OZOZ/I0/10 00'0 86'SSS- 00'0 000'0 bb£L'OOI sou/S/E 0/0000'S Z£IVI80#1I00d VwNd Ell OOIHId SOQZ/S/E -2ISd0 Y1 Hl DNO'I -ZOZZZSLO.dS00AN 'DNI SOQZ/L[/£ SDaS J AOD NVWHd'1-daXO EI I'HcIN90b I£ =QI oSSSO/10/ZO QQ ozoz/10/10 00'0 9Z'LG6'ZOtb- 9Z'LL6'ZO, OLb'6£0'OOb "VL'OOl SO06/8/£ %OQO"S ZElt,180#100d VY1INd 13 soot/I/b OOYRId soot/B/E -21Sd0 Y 11",DNO'I :ZQZZZSL0.3SOOAN'OD S00Z/G[/£ V SHDVS NVW(I'IOD 2IZI0HEl96EM90bI£ atDaSSO/IO/ZO QQ OZOZ/IO/ZO 00'0 09'SOL'I- 00'0 000'0 99ZL'QOl SOOZ/8/£ %OOO'S b9L£ISO#'IOOd VWN3 ST f SOOZ/I/b OOYqId Som/S/E -HHd0 Y HJ,DNO'I :ZOZ MOdS00AN '00 SOOZ/LT/£ V SHOVE NVYNQ'IOD--dZX0 IH96HNi9ObIV QI oasso I0/ZO QQ OZOZ/IO/ZO 00'0 69'960'£LL- 6S'960'£LL OSO'OZS'L9L 99ZL'OQI SO06/8/E 0/0000'S b9LEISO#'I0od V aid H sSOOZ/I/b 03WId SOOZ/S/£ -213dO YfHH.L DNO'I:ZOZZZSLO.dSDOAN'OD SOOZ/LI/£ V SHOVSNVYIIQ'IOD ZI3IO2IH96HN190bI£ QI odSso/I O/ZO QQ OZOZ/IO/ZO 00'0 tb'ZZZ'Z- 00'0 000'0 99ZL'OOI sOOZ/S/£ 0/0000'S b9LEISO#'IOOd VWNd SI s s00Z/l/b ODWId SOOZ/S/E -NSdO MHL DNO'I :ZOZZZSLO.dSDOLN 'OD SOOZ/LI/E 59 SHOVS NVYNQ'IOD-21HI0W196an9O,I£ QI Dam/IO/ZO Qa OZOZ/TO/Zo 00'0 6I'99E'LOO'l- 61'99£'LOO'l Ob8'66O'000'I 99ZL'00I SOOZ/8/E %OQO'S b9L£TSO#'IOOd VWNd S 00WId SQoz/S/£ 2ISdo Mal ONO'I =ZOZZZSLOdS00]IN '0NI S00Z/LI/£ SDSS,LAODNVWHS'I -dHX02IHODQ'I9ObI£ Ql DdSSO/10/10 QQ OZOZ/I0/10 00'0 Lvzol`I- 00'0 000'0 bbEL'001 S006/8/£ %000'9 £06ZISO#'100d VWN3 Ell ODNIId SOOZ/8/£ ilad0 M21,11 ONO'T :ZOZZZSLOdSDOAN'DNI SOOZ/L[/£ SDSSJAODNVWHS'I2IHI0HCIGDQ'I90b1£ QI DSSsohohO QQ OZOZ/IO/l0 00'0 SS'ESL'66t,- 9S'CSL'6617 ObS'OII'96b tltCL'001 SOOZ/S/E %OOO'S £06ZISO#'I00d VWNd H --- ---- - ----------- ases WWI[ eggs----- zsd/aazugs awe x3 aaes aqua pavodam uapdpasaa eddy ssoZ/uTUD WE ;unouw ;soJ 8011d alms a;sa oplas UW L avizd PK"n awa opaz,L ........ ---............ -_... __ __ _.. ._ ......I... ... .... soot/i/£ 00001000ae00-azcvirrrosmoo-aaw asn :,Cvu=no ams dzofa;8a uopassuszy Aq papodag soveesa :az odoU FIB46Q uo14assuszy ...... ........--.--..... . ........ _....... .. __. _._._..._ ..._..._...._.... ............ ..... .............. - .... ...._........ ..... L i awcl alas fomov t{auaq-yjozA SOOZ/0£/E 00INIcl HadO MHI ONO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSOOA SOOZ/T£/E N'd2IO0 NOJSOS JSHLd HSSIIIS JdaH21O Ilaxo ISZXVS9bLT9:aI OHSb0/El/TO GOV OO'086'Z00'Z- 00'086'6OO'Z 000'000'000'Z 06K'OO1 SOOZ/OE/E as L00Z/ZI/TO JA 2IVA AH INIVJS NVDHOYq S OOYHTd-Hado Mal ONo'I SOOZ/£Z/E •ZOZZZS40AS30XH0AAASN'IOSSH/XNVS S00Z/6Z/£ HSVHO NV WIN df :2THIO2ISESVf'6Zi ft :at 03SSO/6Z/£0 as LOOZ/BZ/ZO 00'0 OO'OOO'OOO'£- 00'00O'000'£ 000'000'000`£ 0000'OO1 SOOZ/EZ/£ JAI 2IVA ZOQQQ ILL#NIW d2I00 NI-1 OSSH S 03Y1TId-2IHdo WDal ON0'I SOQZ/OE/£ 'ZOZZZSL0ds3oo3SI0NVHd NVS'O'I'I 0H8 SQOZ/�/b VOIEHWV do ONVS-daxo ISTY1I obuob aI OHSi70/TZ/60 as 400Z/IZ/60 00'0 E£'£OE- 00'0 000'0 0890'001 SOOZ/0£/£ JX HVA ZI000HS#NIW VSfl?IS OSSH Ell ooygld-2ISdo Mai DWI Z/0£/£ 'ZOZZZSLOdSOOOOSIONWANVS'O'I'IOHS SQQ SOZ/Or/t VOI2I m do ONVS-daxO2ISTYRVOozvot (II0HSb0/TZ/60 as 40OZ/TZ/60 00'0 00'O4I'OSZ- 00'OLT'OSZ 000'000'O96 0890'OO1 SOOZ/OE/£ JAI 2IVA ZT0002IS#NJA VSfl XS OBSH S OOYQld SOOZ/TZ/E -213dO Mal ONO'I:ZOZZZSL0dmoAN '00 SOOZ/�Z/£ V SHOVS NVW(I'IOJ 2THX0lISEZI'HIf,IBE aI OHSSO/TO/Z0 as 900Z/TO/80 QOV EE'88t'E- 0O'0 000'0 8600*001 SOOZ/IZ/E JX 2IVA 91Z00 2IJ,#NJA SHOVS NVNTa'IO0 SI oz)ygld SOOZ/IZ/E -HadO M211 ONO'I:ZOZZZS4OdSO0AN 'OD SOOZ/i�Z/£ T SHOVS NVWCI'IOD-2IZIOHSEZf'HIbIBE at0HSS0/TO/ZO as 900Z/TQ/80 00'0 00'96I'QOO'Z- 00'961'000'Z 000'000'000'Z 8600'OOI SOOZ/IZ/E JX 2TVA 91 ZOO III#NJA SHOVS NVINa'IO'T) S ODWId-2IHdO Y1T2T3J, SOOZ/OE/E 0NO'I:ZOZZZSLOdSOOA N'dHO0 NOJSOS SOOZ/[E/£ 'DUI HSSInSJ[aH2I0 ZT3IO2IaVIMTbISE aI OHSbO/1040 as LOOZ/0£/EO JH 00'0 ZZ'LLI- 00'0 000'0 OS60'001 SOOZ/OE/E NVA EOZ002LL#NIW d2I0 SHOVS NVWG'IOJ SI o3IM1IId-Hado Mai SOOZ/OE/E JNO'I'ZOZZZSLOASOOA N'd2I0O NOJSOS SOOZ/I£/E dsul d HSSIf s IlClamO 2THxozlavhla T b 18£ aI OHSbO/1040 as LOOZ/0£/£0 J21 00'0 00'006'100'Z- 00'006'100'Z OOO'000'QOO'Z OS60'001 SOOZ/0£/E 2TVA EOZOOHI#NJX dX0 SHOVS NVW(I'IO) S agog assg DIMS zd/Iajv[8 aqua XH Dime vwa pavodag uol;dlimma ad Al sso'I/uTUD lam junOury 4603 aalsd ague a;$a 80308 ugzy 90pa worI aqua aPWZ SOOZ/iE/£ - SOOZ/1/E 0OOO1000D8OO-Q7ldarIO811TOO-Q8OO asn :soaauna ave 6soga;8C) uoj;assuwj, Aq papodag Wva= M uodug [�B;aQ uo1;a8 mini, _ 8I alga areas IBniov; t{�uat�av� 00wId-2ISd0 s00Z/I£/£ WHS'I'ONO'I=ZOZZZSLodsoocrHoa QVJS SQOZ/QZ/� 'cm SSLLI2I ms SHn 2IHIO2II3ZnOSZSZI6:QI OgftO/I£/SO QQ 00'0 9V668'L- 00'0 000'0 0£S6'86 SOOZ/I E/E 90OZ/I£/80%SL£'Z 6MLON ANnSVZHJ.S n at 00wId-2ISd0 s00z/I£/£ WHS'I'ONO'I :Z06USL03SOOMdOA HVJS soot/OZ/t� ,DTISaLLI-anoss SEM daXO SZ;fID8Z8Z16 :QI OSsto/I£/80 QQ 00'0 Z8'OLO'SsE'Z- Z8'OLO'8SE'Z 000'000'00b'Z OESZ'86 SOOZ/I£/£ 900Z/I£/s0%SLE'z SUONAzmsvausn H 00wid SOOZ/6Z/E 2ISdOMSIDNO'I :ZOZZZSL0dSOOXHOA SQOZ/OE/£ maN 'ONI'IVIUVO SAV'IO2IVS ZIaIO2II39J88ZSZ16:QI0SSE0/SI/ZI QQ 00'0 06'6Eb'L3- 00'0 000'0 £ISZ'L6 SOOZ/6Z/£ 80OZ/9I/ZI%SLE'E SZION.UMSVZHISn at 00wid SQOZ/6Z/£ -2I2d0 Mal ONUI ZIMUSLOASOOXHOA SOOZ/Q£/E A%aN 'ONI'IVJddVO SAV'IO2IVS 7IHIO2IH9JS8Z8ZI6:QIOSSE0191/ZI QQ 00'0 SL'E6S'6EL'S- SL'£69'6EL'S 000'000'006'9 £I8Z'L6 SOOZ/6Z/£ SQOZ/SI/Z1%SL£'E S&LON A2InSVZHI S n E OO➢QId-2ISdo SOOZ41/£ Yd2ISJ.ON0'I 'ZOZZZSLOdSDOXHOA mam 'ONI SOOZ/91/£ 'IVJddVO SAV'IDHVI3-dZXOHE1931d££Z68 QI oasso/9I/£0 QQ 90OZ/8I/60 00'0 00'88I'8661- 00'88I'866'1 o00'0oo'o00'z tb606'66 soozh l/E JX 2IVA£Itb0081#NJM HO HJM VIOAOI I3 00wid-2ISdo s00Z/zZ/£ D 211ON0`I :zozus;LOds000Os1ONV2I.d SOOZ/sZ/£ NVS '0T1 aas vordam do ONVa ZiaxoasZZVS9bL 19:QI Dam/Z I/I I as 00'0 LS'IOb'z- 00'0 000'0 0000'001 SOOZ/ZZ/E 90OZ/60/I 1 JA EVA JA AZ INVJS NVOMOW at 00D1I1d-azd0 SOOZ/zZ/£ YOS'L ONO'I 'ZOZZZSLOdSOOOOSIONVZIA Sooz/8z/£ NVS 'Di i Ohs vord w d0 ONVa dzxo2IHZZVs9t,L 19:QI oasb0/Z I/I I as 00'0 00'000'oS9- 00'000`Os9 000'00o`OS9 0000*001 SOOZ/ZZ/E 900z/60/1 I JX NVA JR A3'INVJ.S NVDZIOIN a s00z/Q£/£ 00wid-2ISd0 MZIL DNO'I :ZOMESLodsooA soot/t£/£ N d[HOO NOJSOI3 JSHI.d SSSMS IICIZHO 2Izi02IHzxve9i7L 19:at oast o/E 1/10 00'0 00*096'11 00'0 000'0 06t,1'00I SOOZ/OE/E QQLOOZ/ZI/10 J.212IVAA21NVJSNVONOW Ell -- -- ---------- ---------- 1 a�re8 a�S one Zd/aan4S aqua xd mms aisa Pavoda?I ucq:ldposaa adds ssoZ/UPD lax lanoiuV 4900 amid ases a4va *pies usss soma I"cq a;sa apses _ _ ... .... .... . . ...._ SOOZ/i E/E ' SOOZ/i/€ OOOOT000DSW"aZgVQZ jDB CKkOHOO asa :A=wmo wus 6jo$a;sa uol:lommsjZ Aq papodag Wvs= :m Uadva Os}aQ uo��assusss ....... -... — _._--- --- - _ Transaction Detail Report ID. EWBA09 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCBD4COl11B0 1n&2FD-OCS000010000 3/1/2005 - 3/31/2005 Statoa:FINAL _ _...... _ _ _ Trade Date Local Price Tran Settle Date Base Price Cost Amount Net(lain/Loss TYPe Description Reported Date Base Ex Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base B U S TREASURY NOTES 3.500%12/15/2009 3/8/2005 97.6090 14,000,000.000 13,665,257.90 -13,665,257.90 0.00 DD 12/15/04SEC ID:912828DE7BROKER 3/31/2005 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07522202:3/8/2005 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO iB U S TREASURY NOTES 3.500% 12/15/2009 3/8/2005 97.6090 0.000 0.00 -142,692.31 0.00 DD 12/15/04SEC ID:912828DE7BROKER: 3/31/2005 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07522202:3/8/2005 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO B U S TREASURY NOTES 3.500%12/15/2009 3/14/2005 97.0313 14,000,000.000 13,584,375.00 -13,584,375.00 0.00 DD 12/15/04SEC ID:912828DE7BROKER 3/14/2005 MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SMITH INC 3/14/2005 NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IB U S TREASURY NOTES 3.500%12/15/2009 3/14/2005 97.0313 0.000 0.00 -1 19,807.69 0.00 DD 12/15/04SEC ID:912828DE7BROKER: 3/14/2005 MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SMITH INC 3/14/2005 NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO TOTAL FIRED INCOME SECURITIES U.B.DOLLAR 84,501,234.920 83,650,968.73 -84,030,688.52 0.00 TOTAL FIRED INCOME SECURITIES BASE: 84,501,234.920 83,650,868.73 -84,030,688.52 0.00 TOTAL PURCHASES BABE: 456,006,468.000 454,149,749.80 -454,529,569.59 0.00 PAY UPS FIRED INCOME SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR PU FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 A VAR RT 2/l/2005 100.0000 0.550 0.55 -0.55 0.00 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/97SECID: 2/1/2005 3133TCE950CSF07522202: LONG TERM 3/l/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/21/2005: Workbench Actual Settle Date 19 ............ ......... . .. ... . . . ......... Transaction Detail Report m: ZWBAM Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSD-CONBOUnATED-OCSG 100010000 3/1/200b - 3/31/2005 State:FINAL __ __......_ ......... _ Trade Date Local Price Tran Settle Date Base Price Coat Amount Net(lain/Loss TYPe Description Reported Date Base Ex Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base PU FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 A VAR RT 3/1/2005 100.0000 1.700 1.70 -1.70 0.00 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/97SECID: 3/1/2005 3133TCE950CSF07522202: LONG TERM 3/1/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/21/2005* PU US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.375% 1/15/2005 100.0000 31,920.000 31,920.00 -31,920.00 0.00 01/15/2007 DD 0 1/15/97SEC ID: 1/15/2005 9128272M30CSF07522202: LONGTERM 3/l/2005 OPER-PTMCO 3/3l/2005- PU US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.625% 1/15/2005 100.0000 6,720.000 6,720.00 -6,720.00 0.00 01/15/2008 DD 01/15/98SEC ID: 1/15/2005 9128273T70CSF07522202:LONG TERM 3/l/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/31/2005- PU US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.875% 1/15/2005 100.0000 28,730.000 28,730.00 -28,730.00 0.00 01/15/2009 DD O1/15/99SECID: 1/15/2005 9128274Y50CSF07522202:LONG TERM 3/1/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/31/2005- TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR 67.372.250 67,372.25 -67,372.25 0.00 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES BASE: 67,372.260 67,372.2S -67,372.2E 0.00 TOTAL PAY UPS BASE: 67,372.250 67,372.25 -67,372.25 0.00 SALES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR S FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DISC MAT 3/11/2005 99.5844 -10,000,000.000 -9,958,444.44 9,958,444.44 0.00 05/04/2005SEC ID:313397FD8BROKER: 3/11/2005 MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC, 3/11/2005 NYOCSF07522202: LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO Workbench 'Actual Settle Date 20 I� �Q ail7aS TBR7oV tlauagx�om 00Wld-2ISd0 DI HI ONO'I SoOZ/T I/£ •ZOZZZStOASDOAN 'OD V SHOW NVW(I'IO'D -dHX0HEIZXH68S£I£ :QI OSSSOOZ/4090 0O'0 00.OZI'ITO`OI o0'OZI'IIO'OI- 000'000'OOI'01- QOZT'66 SOOZ/II/£ IVYJKnODS1QNSSdD.IM'LLVNWUSQSd S SOOZ/I I/£ 00WId-Had0 Mai ONO'I S00Z/I I/£ •ZOZZZStOdSDOAN '00 V SHOVS NVW(1'I00 2IHX02IHOHO68S£I£:QI OSSSO06/I0/90 00'0 ZI'ZLS 00'0 OQO'0 t,88Z'66 SOOZ/T T/£ JVW JN OSIQ NS9V VIL1 UVN'I HaGad SI SOOZ/I T/£ 03INId-2ISd0 MS.L ONO'I SOOZ/[T/£ ZQZZZSLOASDOAN 'OD V SHOW NVWG IOD 2IaXONE[OH068S£I£:Ql OSSSOOZ/10/90 00'0 bb'4O£'b6L WLO£'b64- 000'000'008- b88Z'66 SOOZ/I I/£ ,LV➢H•LN DSIQ NSSV DLW I,LVN' UH(IS3 S SOOZ/vI/£ mwicl-2ISd0 u1no'I SOOZ/9[/£ 'ZOI I ISL03SOOAN '00 V SHDVS NVYNQ'IOO ZIHX0HEIVId68S£T£:(II DSSSOOZ/I I/SO 00'0 O4'08VS 00'0 000'0 6£b£'66 SOOZ/bT/£ JVW INf1OOSIQ NSSVIE)J i'ILVN WHHQZd S1 SOOZ/bI/£ ODDHId-2ISd0 QInDI'I SOOZ/9I/£ 'ZOI I T SL03S30AN 'OD V SHOVS NVW(I'IOO 2IaX0HEIZ'I.d68S£I£:QI OSSSOOZ/I I/SO 00'0 £9'ZSZ'b8£'Z £9'ZSZ'b8£'Z- OOO'OQO'OOb'Z- 6£b£'66 SOOZA I/£ LVW d=03SIQ NSSV DIN-IJVN IVHHC[gd S SOOZ/L T/£. 03YNId-2I2d0 YN2IS.L ONO'1 SOOZ/L[/£ ZOZZZSLOdSDOAN'ONI SDSS.LAOO NVIRHS'I 2TaX0'dElZAAI'L6££I£=Q1 OSSSOOZ/T 0/80 00'0 99'9I4 00'0 000'0 41t,8'86 SOOZ/LI/£ LVW DSIQ dH00 MW NI aWOH WNSCIZA sl soot/L[/£. ODWid-2ladO DN2IS.I ONO'I SOOZ/L I/£ ZOZZZSLOdSDOAN'DNT SDSS JAAOO NV➢NHS I HaX0HEIZBAPL6££I£:QI DSSSOOZ/10/80 00'0 49'T6I'OSZ'b 49'16I'O5;Z'b- o00'OOO'00£'b- LIbB'86 SOOZ/LI/£ .LVW DSIQ d800 ULW NZ ZWOH'IV2ISIIS3 S SOOZ/I I/£ODbNId-2ISdO MH L IDNO'I :ZOZZZSL036-30AN SOOZ/I I/£ `DNI 00 V AH INVIS NV`ZIOW daxosE8Q3L6££T£ :QI 03SSO0Z/b0/SO 00'0 9S'SOs'T 00'0 000'0 tIb89'66 SOOZ/I I/£ JVW DSIQ d2I0D DJA NZ SNIOH'IVHZ(IZ3 SI ague arse agee =d/gamgs aiuH xe ame aiva papodaa uol;dl=osaQ add ssoZ/zgvo;am :IunouiH 4900 valid ague a;ea ap;as us=y aaTsd Mo'I WWI OPWI zvx��• ems SOOZ/i E/E - SOOZ/i/E 000010000wo-croxy anosxoa-asoo asn :A=auno'mg 6ioAnua uoj:jass wu L Aq papodag 60va= :M�Od's TTS4aa uo1�assussy ......_ ... .._. . ........ . ._ .... . ......... . .._...._..__... . .................. ... . .._......_......._ _............... ......... zz �WQ OPIOS TOMW rt trjuagx.joAI 00wid-2Isd0 s00Z/8I/£ Mal ONO'I •ZOZZZSLQdSOOQ2iOAmlS SOOz/sI/£ 'an SmLamoaS SEn 2IaXO1TS6UAS6LZI6:QI OHSSQOOZ/LI/£0 00'0 00'OSL'8SI'ZZ 00'OSL'8ST'ZZ- 000'000'OOs'ZZ- MV86 SOOZ/SI/£ QQ SOOZ/ST/60 anG TIIS A MSV3Ul S fl s OOIRId-uad0 SOOZ/LI/£ Mal DNOZ 'ZOZZZSLOdsoocrmodb1IVJ.S 'on ssLLI2 aas Sall s00Z/L[/£ 2iHXOlI8 I HAS6LZ I6:QI OSSSOOZ/OZ/10 00'0 OS'0Ss`£ 00'0 000'0 ISIL'86 SOOZ/LT/£ QQ s00Z/TZ/LO aria'I'IIS AHnsvazLL S fi SI 03wid-2Isd0 SOOZ/LI/E L1HEIDNO'I •ZOZZZSLQdSOOQ2IOdNvjS 'Orn SSIJd2 02S Safi SOOZ/L[/E 2IHXOHS I HAS6LZ I6:QI OSSSOOZ/OZ/10 EO'O OS'LT9`b8T'T £S'L19`bSi'I- 000-000'00z'I- 181L'86 s00Z/LI/E QQ s00Z/Iz/LO sflQ'I'IIa AHnsvzui S f1 S SOOZ/L I/£ 00wid-Had0 IHHs.L ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOA SOOZ/G[/£ N VHOD NOISOH J.SHld sssins.LIGaND ZIZXOHEltUX683ETE:QI 32S9006/80/80 00'0 8S'6SV£ 00'0 000'0 6917L'86 SOOZ/L I/£ J.VW J.NfIOOSIQ NSSV DJJK'I.LVN'NHHQsd SI SOOZ/LI/£ ODWId-2I3dOD HZIDNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOA SOOZ/L[/£ N'd2I00 NOJSOS JSHM sSSMS IMHO ZIaXOHHbQ}I68S£I£:QI OHSSOOZ/80/80 00'0 Zb'b9b'EI8'9 Zb'b9b'ETS`9- 000'000'006'9- 6SbL'86 SOOZ/LI/E XVW JKnOOSIQ NSSV D.LN'LLVN'Id2isasd S SOOZ/T I/E OOIHId SZdO MZJ.ONO'I:ZOZZZSLOdMOA SOOZ/I I/£ N `d2IOD NOISOH JSHM HSSLaS J IQs2IO dHJI02ISi7Q?I689£IE:Qi OSSSOOZ/80/80 00'0 Ltb'ZEO'T 00'0 000'0 6SK'86 SOOZ/I I/E LVW.LNnOOSI(I NSSV DJJN IJ.VN WH2(I3d SI SOON I I/£ 00WId HZdO Mal DNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOA SOOZ/I I/£ N 'd2IOD NOJ.SOH JS2Hid HSSInS JACIaHO 7IH?IO2IHt,Q}I68S£TE:QI OHSs00Z/80/80 00'0 69'IZI'I90'£ 69'IZI'I90'E- 000'000'001'E- 63tL'86 SOOZ/II/£ LVYgJ.NnCYJSIQ NSW DJW'IJVN'N (lad S SOOZ/I I/£ 00WId-21sdO Mal ONO'I SOOZ/I I/£ 'ZOZZZSLOSSOOAN 'OO 48 SHOVE NVW(I'IOJ ?IH7IO2iHZ7IH68SEI£ QIOHSS00Z/LZ/90 00'0 00,919,1 00'0 000'0 OOZ I'66 SOOZ/I I/£ Lvyv J.N oosiQ NSSV DJM'I.LVN'IVHSQHd SI asses - asBg --- agog ssd/sassgS aqua 2m ams alga Pazzoda2t dA, ssoZ/UIgD ION ;unow1 4900 001=d asgH a;va ama8 IIgsy a 19"1 a;8a apwjl SOOZ/t£/E - SOOZ/T/E 0000I0000SD0-ouvanoWo"Goo aim :"uwmo nun 6sogolva aopowmv.T L Aq pa-podag mvsms M:Podgu �e�aQ ao��assues,L _....... .. ................_.-. .. _._..._. _ ......... .... ..__ ....................... .-......... . .. _ ... ..., Transaction Detail Report m: EWBAW Reported by Transaction Category Dam Currency, UBD 0CSD-c0x80r rDATZD-OCOCK o 10000 3/1/2005 - 3/31/200S Status: FINAL Trade Date Local Price Tran Settle Date Base Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss TYPO Description Reported Date Base Ex Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base IS U S TREASURY BILL DUE 09/15/2005 DD 3/18/2005 98.4833 0.000 0.00 2,047.50 0.00 03/17/2000SSEC ID:912795VR913ROKER: 3/18/2005 UBS SECURITIES LLC, 3/18/2005 STAMFORDOCSF07522202: LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO S U S TREASURY BILL DUE 09/I5/2005 DD 3/24/2005 98.4833 -2,100,000.000 -2,068,150.00 2,068,149.93 -0.07 03/17/20005SEC ID:912795VR9BROKER: 3/24/2005 BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC, NEW 3/24/2005 YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- PIMCO IS U S TREASURY BILL DUE 09/15/2005 DD 3/24/2005 98.4833 0.000 0.00 867.78 0.00 03/17/2000SSEC ID:91279SVR9BROKER 3/24/2005 BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC, NEW 3/24/2005 YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- PIMCO S U S TREASURY BILL DUE 09/15/2005 DD 3/29/2005 98.4933 -2,800,000.000 -2,757,533.33 2,757,533.24 -0.09 03/17/20005SEC ID:912795VR913ROKER: 3/29/2005 MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC, 3/29/2005 NYOCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IS U S TREASURY BILL DUE 09/15/2005 DD 3/29/2005 98.4833 0.000 0.00 2,125.76 0.00 03/17/2000SSEC ID:912795VR9BROKER 3/29/2005 MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC, 3/29/2005 NYOCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO S U S TREASURY BILL DUE 09/15/2005 DD 3/30/2005 98.4833 -5,800,000.000 -5,712,033.34 5,712,033.14 -0.20 03/17/20005SEC ID:912795VR9BROKER: 3/30/2005 UBS SECURITIES LLC, 3/30/2005 STAMFORDOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IS U S TREASURY BILL DUE 09/15/2005 DD 3/30/2005 98.4833 0.000 0.00 5,085,50 0.00 03/1 7/20005SEC ID:912795VR9BROKER 3/30/2005 UBS SECURITIES LLC, 3/30/2005 STAMFORDOCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S U S TREASURY BILL DUE 09/15/2005 DD 3/31/2005 98.4833 -1,800,000.000 -1,772,700.00 1,772,699.94 -0.06 03/17/20005SEC ID:912795VR9BROKER: 3/31/2005 MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC, 3/31/2005 NYOCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Workbench Actual Settle Date 23 ........... . _ _ --- ._ _........ .......... .................... Transaction Detail Report M. IMMAW Reported by Transaction Category Rase Currenor: USD 0C9D6C0W0LM2W-oCscloW l00W 3/1/2005 - 3/31/2005 Sta ft ;FINAL ... ... Trade Date Local Price Tran Settle Date Base Price Cost Amount Net(lain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Far Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base IS U S TREASURY BILL DUE 09/15/2005 DD 3/31/2005 98.4833 0.000 0.00 1,932.06 0.00 03/17/20005SEC ID:912795VR9BROKER: 3/31/2005 MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC, 3/31/2005 NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 02.550%03/01/2005 3/1/2005 100.0000 13,000,000.000 -13,000,000.00 13,000,000.00 0.00 DD 02/28/05SEC ID:99432C236BROKER: 3/1/2005 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102:3/I/2005 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO is LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 02.550%03/01/2005 3/1/2005 100.0000 0.000 0.00 920.83 0.00 DD 02/28/05SEC ID:99432C236BROKER: 3/1/2005 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102:3/1/2005 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S LEHMAN CAT 1 REPO REPO 02.460% 3/2/2005 100.0000 -200,000.000 -200,000.00 200,000.00 0.00 03/02/2005 DD 03/01/05SEC ID: 3/2/2005 99432D86 I BROKER. LEHMAN GOVT SECS 3/2/2005 INC, NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 1 REPO REPO 02.460% 3/2/2005 100.0000 0.000 0.00 13.67 0.00 03/02/2005 DD 03/01/05SECID: 3/2/2005 99432D86 I BROKER. LEHMAN GOVT SECS 3/2/2005 INC,NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- PIMCO S LEHMAN CAT 1 REPO REPO 02.420% 3/2/2005 100.0000 -13,000,000.000 -13,000,000.00 13,000,000.00 0.00 03/02/2005 DD 03/01/05SECID: 3/2/2005 99432E083BROKER: LEHMAN GOVT SECS 3/2/2005 INC,NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 1 REPO REPO 02.420% 3/2/2005 100.0000 0.000 0.00 873.89 0.00 03/02/2005 DD 03/01/05SEC ID: 3/2/2005 99432EO83BROKER LEHMAN GOVT SECS 3/2/2005 INC, NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 02.460%03/04/2005 3/4/2005 100.0000 -3,900,000.000 -3,900,000.00 3,900,000.00 0.00 DD 03/03/05SEC ID:99432G898BROKER: 3/4/2005 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07511102:3/4/2005 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO Workbench *Actual Settle Date 24 SZ ;Jqua was Isn;ay. SOOZ/OI/£ODWid-?ISdo aillai'I :ZOI I ISLOASOOAN'ONI SQOZ/OI/£ SOSS lAOJ NVINHS'I -dZXOHEIIZSNZEb66 aI OSSS0/60/EO as SOOZ/OI/£o OTO 00'000'OOS'OI OO'000'OOS'OI- OQO'000'OOS'OI- 0000'00I SQOZ/OI/£ 0/6096'ZO OdaH OdHH I IVO NVINHTI S SOOZ/6/£. OOIHid-2ISd0 aiflai'I N'-ZOI I ISLOHSOOAONI SONS.LAOrJ NVDHHH'I SOOZ/6/£ HaXO2IEIOMZEb66:aI OHSSO/80/EO as 00'O SZ'86E 00'0 000'0 0000'001 9006/6/£ SOOZ/60/£O%0£b'ZO OdHH Z LLVO NVINHH'I Si SOOZ/6/£- 00wid-Hado ainorl SOOZ/6/£ ZOI I ISLOASOOAN`ONI SONS JA00 NV➢1iHSI 2iaX02IS0£87ZEb66:aI OSSSO/80/£O as 00'0 00'000'006`9 00'000`006'9- 000'OOO'OO6'S- 0000'00I 9006/6/£ SOOZ/60/£0%OEi7'ZO Od3H Z IVO NVINHS'I S SOOZ/8/£OOIRId-2IHd0 a1flaI'I :ZOI I ISLOASOOAN 'ONI SOOZ/8/£ SONS IA00 NVWHTI --dZX02IHZ6SXZ£b66 aI OHSSO/LO/£0 as SOOZ/80/£O 00'0 LI'£Ob 00'0 000'0 0000*001 SOOZ/8/£ 0/609VZO OdSH OdHH I IVO NVINHH'I SI SOOZ/8/£00WId-2ISd0 UU101'I :ZOI I ISLOASOOAN 'ONI IN SOOZ/8/£ BOSS IAOO NVHH'I -dZXO ISZ6S;XZ£b66 al 0HSSo/4o/£0 as SQOZ/s0/£0 00'0 00'000'006'9 00'000'006'S- QOO'o00'006'S- 0000,001 SOOZ/8/£ 0/609b'ZO OdZU OdaH I LVO NVWHS'I S 00NIId-2ISdO $00Z/L/£ u1no'I :ZOIIISL03S30AN 'd2I0ONOdSOH SOOZ/L/£ iSaid SSSInS.AMHO-dHX02IflbLOI'Z£b66 al OSSSO/bO/£O as SOOZ/LO/£0 00'0 £8"68I'I 00'0 000'0 0000-00I SOOZ/L/£ %OZb'ZO OdHH Sd SSSLnS IIQSH3 SI o3YQId-2IHd0 S00Z/L/£ a[f1a1'I =ZOI I ISLOdSOOA N'dH(Y)NOISOH SOOZ/L/£ JSHld HSSMS IlGaZIO=2IHX02ISbLOPZ£b66 MI OHSSO/t O/£O as SOOZ/LO/£O GOV 00'000'006'S OO'000'006'S- 000'000`006'9- 0000'00I SOOZ/L/£ %OZb'ZOOdau ad HSSIf1S,LIQamD S 03b1I1d-HSd0 alflall SOOZ/b/£-ZOI I ISLOASOOAN 'ONI SOSS JAM NIVINHH'I dHX02Ifi8680Z£tb66:aI 0SSSO/£O/£0 as 00'0 OS'99Z 00'0 000'0 0000'00I SOOZ/b/£ SOOZ/VO/£O%09b'ZO OdZH Z IVO NVINHH'I Si awns Doug Dime isd/sajugs ;qua zz Dues a4ua papodva uopdpaoaa ed4L soal/uTufl ION ;un0aw 4S00 valid Dseg 24sa amas tasty "lid Pool Olga OPWI _._ . ... _ _.._ ........ _......_ __ .... . . _........ soot/T S/E - goot/i/E 00001000DO00-Qsuv+l 7piu moolcsoo 6so$a;8o uol;ommwy Aq papodag 6aVEM m U"Qm TEulaQ u01:109MML 9Z 2WQ afu2s IgR1oV s tf�i/8g7(10� soot/�T/£. Omid-Hado alllori ZOT T 1SLOASo0AN'ONI SONS J.AOJ NVFiHHI -daxoHS9LOHZEb66:QI oasso/I I/£0 as 00*0 00.000'0os,01 00.000'oos,01- 000"000'00S'ol- 0000•001 SOOZ/b1/E SOOZ/bi/£0%OLVZO OdHH Z.LVoNVWHH'I S SOOZ/I I/£Oomd-HHdo Qlflbl'I :ZOI T ISLodsooAN 'oN1 SOOZ/[I/£ SOHS J.AOJ NVWHH'I :HH}IOHSSZIaZEb66 Q1 OZSSO/OI/£0 QQ SOOZ/I I/£O 00.0 SO'ZEL 00'0 000*0 0000'00I SOOZ/I I/E 0/601S•ZO OdHH OdHH I J.Vo NVMia'I S1 Sow/T T/£omid-HHdo citnO I =ZOI I I SLoa6mAN 'am SOOZ/I I/£ SOHS J.A00 NVYiHH'I ZIH?IOHSSZIOM766 QIOHSSO/OI/£0 au SODZ/IT/EO OD'o 00'000'009'01 00'0D0'00S,01- 000'000`00S'0I- 0000"00I SOOZ/I I/E %OIS'ZO OdHH OdHH I J.VO NVLqHHI S OOINld-HHdO D1 ZI SOOZ/T I/E flN0'I •ZOZZZSLOASo0A N'dHOo NOJ.SOS SOOZ/[I/£ JSHLd HSSIfIS JdQHHO 2IHXOHSZLSdZEt,66 aiDasso/OI/EO QQ SOoZ/TI/£0 00*0 W90b 00.0 000'0 0000'001 SOOZ/I I/E %OSb'ZO OdHH Ed HSSIfIS J.IQHHO S1 ODWId-HHdo Mal SOOZ/I I/£ ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdMOA N 'dHOo NOJSOS SOOZ/I i/E 'LSHIA HSSInS.LIQHHo ZIHXOHSZLSdZ£b66 QI msso/oT/£0 Ga SOOZ/I I/EO 00'0 00'000'006'9 00'000'006'S- OOD'ODO'OO6'9- 0000.001 SOOZ/I I/£ %OSb'ZO Odad S3 HSSIfIS JIQHHo S SOOZ/01/£. Oo➢1IId-HHdO MSI ON0'I SOOZ/0[/£ ZOZZZSLOdSOOAN 'oNI SONS J.AOD NVDrIHH'I ZIHXOH8bSSNZ£b66:QI oHSSO/60/£O Ga OVO SL'bEL'I 00'0 000'0 0000'001 SOOZ/OT/E SOOZ/OI/£0�/aOEb•ZO OdSH Z J.VO NVINHH'I S1 SOOZ/OI/£. ODWId-'SHdO Mal JN(YI SOOZ/OI/£•ZOZZZSLOASo0AN 'oNI SONS J.AOi)NVWHH I -daXOHSbSSNZ£b66:QI DZSSO/60/EO au 00'0 00'000'00L'SZ 00'000'004'SZ- 000'000'00L'sZ- 0000*001 SOOZ/OI/E SOOZ/OI/£0%O£t,'ZO OdHH Z J.VO NVWHH I S SOOZ/oi/E O3WId-HHdO Qlflal'I :ZOT T ISLOdSo0AN 'ONI S00Z/OT/E SONS J.AOD NVD1iHH'I --dZXOHSI ZSNZEb66 :(II OSSSO/60/EO QQ SOOZ/OT/£O 00'0 OS'LIL 00.0 000.0 0000'00I SOOZ/01/£ 0/609VZO OdHH OdHH I JVo NVWHH'I SI ages saes saes sBd/eajuqS a;sg za aseg a;aa pavodou uol;dlsasaa adA. 8801 U190 Sam 4unowv 4800 solid aims a;BQ OPIDS Z uss solid IWO'I a;sQ apwil - . --- ... ............ ................ . - 'EvEld:Mine soot/iS/£ - soot/i/8 DOOOTO000eno-craivurJOBNO aSao aen :6mwzno=vs 6xoRa;sa uopommmj, Bq papodag GOVEM :ai:padgu 1184aa uoPasSUWJI _.-_....... .. .... ----- ----- _. ._. . . . --- ------ _.-._ -- ., ---.-- -- Transaction Detail Report m: EWBM9 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency- USD 0CSD4"XS0uDA2ED-ocs0000100W 3/1/2005 - 3/31/2005 Status:FINAL ..._....__.__.._... . Trade Date Local Price Tr an Settle Date Base Price cost Amount Net(lain/Loss TYpe Description Reported Date Base Ex Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 02.470%03/14/2005 3/14/2005 100.0000 0.000 0.00 2,161.25 0.00 DD 03/11/05SEC ID:99432R076BROKER: 3/14/2005 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NYOCSF07511102:3/14/2005 LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S LEHMAN CAT 1 REPO REPO 02.500% 3/15/2005 100.0000 -10,500,000.000 -10,500,000.00 10,500,000.00 0.00 03/15/2005 DD 03/14/05SECID: 3/15/2005 99432S645BROKER:LEHMAN GOVT SECS 3/15/2005 INC,NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 1 REPO REPO 02.500% 3/15/2005 100.0000 0.000 0.00 729.17 0.00 03/15/2005 DD 03/14/05SECID: 3/15/2005 99432S645BROKER: LEHMAN GOVT SECS 3/15/2005 INC, NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S LEHMAN CAT 1 REPO REPO 02.580% 3/16/2005 100.0000 -10,000,000.000 -10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 0.00 03/16/2005 DD 03/15/05SECID: 3/16/2005 99432U244BROKER: LEHMAN GOVT SECS 3/16/2005 INC,NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 1 REPO REPO 02.580% 3/16/2005 100.0000 0.000 0.00 716.67 0.00 03/16/2005 DD 03/15/05SECID: 3/16/2005 99432U244BROKER: LEHMAN GOVT SECS 3/16/2005 INC,NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 02.580% 3/16/2005 100.0000 -1,600,000.000 -1,600,000.00 1,600,000.00 0.00 03/16/2005 DD 03/15/05SEC ID: 3/16/2005 99432U293BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 3/16/2005 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IS CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 02.580% 3/16/2005 100.0000 0.000 0.00 114.67 0.00 03/16/2005 DD 03/15/05SECID: 3/16/2005 99432U293BROKER. CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 3/16/2005 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 02.550% 3/18/2005 100.0000 -13,000,000.000 -13,000,000.00 13,000,000.00 0.00 03/18/2005 DD 03/17/05SECID: 3/18/2005 99432X289BROKER. CREDIT SUISSE FIRST 3/18/2005 BOSTON CORP,N YOCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO Workbench *Actual Settle Date 27 sz �a aluas ietu�t+. x4auag3fj0Al SOOZ/bZ/£ ODWId-2IsdO alflal'I SoOZ/t,Z/E:ZOI I ISLOdSJOAN 'JNI SJHS.LAOf)NVWHH'I -daX0HElZLbQ££t,66:QI JHSSO/£Z/£0 QQ 00*0 00'000'0Ot"L 00'OOO'o0b'L- OOO"000'00b'L- 0000*001 SOOZ/bZ/£ S006/tZ/EO%069'Zo OdSH Z JVJ NVI11IH8'I S OJYHId-2IHdO SOOZ/EZ/E (Ilnbl'I ZOI I ISLOdSJOA N 'd2IOJ NO.LSOEI SOOZ/£Z/E �Ld SSSIfIS.LIQ82IJ-daXONE16b8S££b66 =Ql JSSSO/ZZ/£0 QQ SOOZ/£Z/£o OO'0 00'SZL 00'0 000'0 0000*001 SOOZ/£Z/£ 0/0019'ZO Odam ed 2issms IlGaHo sl OJINId-2IsdO SOOZ/EZ/E alflal'I :ZOI I ISLOdSJOA N'dH03 NOJSOH SOOZ/£Z/£ 'SHE HSS1flS.LIQHso--dHX0HE16b8HE£t,66 QI JHSSo/ZZ/£0 QQ SOOZ/£Z/£0 00'0 00,000,000,01 00'0oo'OOO,Ol- 000'OOO'000'OI- 0000*001 SOOZ/£Z/£ 0/0019'Z0 OdSH tad SSSIIIS.LICiago s OOINId-HadO SOOZ/ZZ/E (IM611 :ZOI I I SLOdSJOA N 'd2I0J NOISOH SOOZ/ZZ/£ �Ld HSSIf1S,LIQHaa -daX0 IH£9IV££b66 =a1 OSSSO/IZ/£o QQ SOOz/ZZ/£0 00'0 L6'SL8 00'0 000*0 0000'OOI SOOZ/ZZ/E 0/0O99'ZO Odau Ed SSSllls,LIQHHO sl OJINId-HadO Soot/zZ/£ alnbI'I :ZOI I ISLodSJOA N'd2IOJ NO.LSOS SOOZ/ZZ/£ �Ld SSSIIIS.LI(IaND -daMONEIC9IV££tt,66 aloasso/IZ/£0 as soot/ZZ/£0 00'0 00'000'006'I I 00'000'006'I I 000'000'006'I I 0000"00I SOOZ/ZZ/E %OS9'ZO OdSH 13d HSSIfIS.LlGaH3 S SoOL/IZ/E. OJYgld-NHdO(IM01I SoOZ/I Z/£ ZOI I I SLOdSJOAN'JNI SJHS J AOO NVINHH'I -daX02IHOb8AZ£b66:QI JHSS0/9I/£0 QQ GOV 00'oE9'Z 00*0 OOO'o 0000'00I SOOZ/IZ/E SOOZ/IZ/£0%OE9'ZOOdaHZIVJNMHs'I sl SOOZ/lz/£. OJINId-HadO alflal'I s00Z/I Z/£ ZOI I ISLOdSJOAN'JNI SUSS.LAOO NVWHs'1 -daX02It3Ob8AZEb66 :QI 3HSSO/8I/EO QQ 00'0 OO-oOO'000'ZI 00'000'0o0'zl- 000'000'000'ZI- 0000'OOI SOOZ/IZ/E SOOZ/IZ/£0%0£9-ZOOdaHZ,LVJNVWH2['I S ooygld-2IsdO SOOZ/8I/£ Qlnbl'I :ZOI I I SLOdSJOA N 'd2IOJ NOJSOt3 SOOZ/8[/£ issid sssinS.LIQHHO 7IHX0ME168ZXZ£t,66 (IIJSSSO/LI/£o QQ SOOZ/8I/EO GOV MOM 00'0 000'0 0000'o0I SOOZ/8I/E 0/0099'ZO OdHm H3 sssins i'Ma I7 sl agog ag8g agog =d/gaffs aqua za mms -aqua Pavodsa uapdPosea adAj goal/ulgo lam 3unomv 1803 valid agog aqua 014429 IIssZ amid 11=07 aqua aPUSI zvgc�: ups soot/i£/£ - SOOZ/i/E 000O100006OO-azzvarloallo"soo asn :Avuaunc)MFUs dio2wIsC) uol;ossuszy Aq papodag 6OVEM :a1 podom U942a UoRommsiZ 6Z alga am s Tunjw. timagXlorn S00z/I£/£OOYIIId-218dO(IMOI'I :ZOI I ISLOdSOOAN 'ONI Soz/IE/E �ZS IAOJ XVWHH'I 2IaIO2ISOZI}I£Eti66 al 32sSO/OE/£0 Qa sooz/I£/Eo GOV 00'Oo0'00b'OI 00'00o'o0bbi- 000'000'OOb'01 0000'00I sooz/LE/£ %o£9'ZO OdUH OdHHi I .LVO NVM-I2'I S S00Z/0£/E. ODWId-HadO UMOI'I SOoz/o£/£ Z0I I ISLodsDOAN 'ONI SOZS d.AOJ NVYHHa I -daX02ISZ96HEEt,66:QI OSSSO/6Z/EO QQ 00'0 EE'Z�8 OTT 000*0 0000*001 SOOZ/0£/E SOOZ/0£/£0%099'ZO OdHH Z.LVO NVYiHS'I sl oz/0£/E. ODWId-N2dO alflal'I so Sooz/OE/£ ZOIIISLOdMOAN'ONISO'3S.LA0`JNVWH21 2IHMOHEIMHEEb66:QI OZSSO/6Z/EO aQ 00'0 00'00o'o06'II 00'000'OOb'II 000'000'006'II- 0000'00I SOOZ/OE/E SOOZ NOW%099'ZOOdHMZ.LVONVINHS'I S OOYIIId-2ISdO SOOZ/6Z/E alnaI'I :ZOI I ISLO,dSOOA N 'dHOO NO.LSOS SOOZ/6Z/E J.SHL4 ZSSInS IIUHHO -dZXOHEIOIZO££b66 =al OSSSO/8z/EO as SOOZ/6Z/EO 00'0 00'398 00'0 000'0 0000'00[ SOOZ/6Z/E %OOL"ZO OdaH Ed ZSSInS ILGH IO sl ODINId-HadO SOOZ/6Z/E alnaI'I :zol I ISLOdS'JOA N`d2I0O NOJSOS SoOZ/6Z/E �Id assins blaaaO -daXOSIaOIZ`JEEb66 al O8SSO/sZ/EO as SOOZ/6Z/EO 00'0 00,00o'00t'II 00,000,00b'II- 000'000'00b'I I- 0000'00I S006/66/E %OOL*ZOOd2H SA 2SSInS.LIa22I3 S OOYHId-21SdO SOOZ/8Z/£ QIIIaI'I :ZOIIISL03sO0AN 'dHODNOJSOS sooz/8z/£ ,LSao USSInS JAISUD-daXO IS9£L3£Etb66 Ql osssohz/co as sooz/sz/Eo 00.0 00'89z'£ 00.0 000'0 0000*00I sooz/sz/E %089'ZO Oda2I 93 ZsslnS IlUaN0 sl OJYHId-2ISdO OZ/Sz/£ alnal'I =zOI I ISLOdsOOA N 'd2I0O NO.LSOS SO sooz/8z/E dSUL 2ISSInS,LIa32IO-2IS)IO2IS9ELSEEb66 Ql 03sso/bZ/Eo as sooz/sz/Eo 00'0 00'000'00b'II 00,000,GoV I I- 000'000'OOb'II- 0000,001 sooz/8z/E %OSS'ZOOdaZISd38SInSIlUaIO S sooz/bz/E. oOYNld-2ISdO alnal'I s00z/bz/£ ZOI I ISLUSOOAN ONI SJ21S.LAOID NVYIIHS'I -daXOHElZLbaE£b66=(II OSSSO/£Z/EO aQ GOV 6E'zES 00'0 000'0 00o0'00I SOOZ/bZ/E SOOZ/bZ/£O%069'ZOOda2IZ.LVONMH2I SI alma *=S zd/saSqe aqua za ases a;va papodag uol4duaoa adds, 8901I/Ul$o 4ox ;unour V 1900 **lid aseg nua arias usiy amid P*07 "8a opwi. __ _._.... ._.._._. ........ . SOOZ/Te/£ - SOOZ/i/S 0000i0000sw-amwarroanrarQsao asn a 6so2a;8C) uol;ommwy 6q papodag 6ovse[Z :M:podaa O940Q UOPOWUWs L ...........— -•-_ ........ .......... _ ..............-.. .. - __ ..__.... .... . .... .._ ................_....._.. _ ..__..... . _..._..---- _. —._ .. _.. .._.._... . _ _._ .. _ Transaction Detail Report ID: ZWBAW Reported by Transaction Category Base Cumner UsD ocsI)-Mxsor R&2=-OCOCH o 10000 3/1/2005 - 3/31/2005 Status: FINAL Trade Date Local Price Tran Settle Date Base Price Cost Amount Net Clain/Loss TYPe Description Reported Date Base ft Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base IS LEHMAN CAT 1 REPO REPO 02.630% 3/31/2005 100.0000 0.000 0.00 759.78 0.00 03/31/2005 DD 03/30/05SECID: 3/31/2005 99433K120BROKEI;t LEHMAN GOVT SECS 3/31/2005 INC,NYOCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 3/1/2005 1.0000 -1,505,230.090 -1,505,230.09 1,505,230.09 0.00 9960852470CSF07511102:LIQUID OPER- 3/1/2005 PIMCO 3/1/2005 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 3/2/2005 1.0000 -591,993.910 -591,993.91 591,993.91 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONGTERM 3/2/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/2/2005 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 3/3/2005 1.0000 -98,365.330 -98,365.33 98,365.33 0.00 9960852470CSF07511102:LIQUID OPER- 3/3/2005 P1MCO 3/3/2005 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 3/9/2005 1.0000 -167,481.590 -167,481.59 167,481.59 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202:LONG TERM 3/9/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/9/2005 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 3/10/2005 1.0000 -31,295.800 -31,295.80 31,295.80 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202:LONG TERM 3/10/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/10/2005 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC 1D: 3/11/2005 1.0000 -269,873.840 -269,873.84 269,873.84 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202:LONG TERM 3/11/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/11/2005 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMTSEC ID: 3/14/2005 1.0000 -58,945.310 -58,945.31 58,945.31 0.00 9960852470CSF07522202: LONG TERM 3/14/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/14/2005 Workbench Actual Settle Date 30 I£ QquQ ai}7aS IgTtlaH. tj=aqjfiojA SOOZ/6Z/£ ODygld-2ISdO SOOZ/6Z/£ WHSI ONOZ :ZOZZZSLOASDOb60L80966 00'0 EI'969'9 EI'S69'9- OEI'969`9- 0000,1 SOOZ/6Z/£ :QI OSS.L V JASOMI AaNOW alV'I-,LQSB S SOOZ/0£/£ ODYUCI-Hado SOOZ/0£/£ Y1RIS.L'DNO'I :ZOZZZSLOASDOLVZS80966 00'0 I0'SI6'6L IO'S16'6L- 010'916'6L- 0000'I SOOZ/0£/£ :QI D'3SIWDYg HSVO A2MSVZHI SnAAaH(I S SOOZ/6Z/£ ODYgId-HHdO SOOZ/6Z/£ WHSIONO'I :ZOZZZSL03SDOL17ZS80966 00*0 L8'Sti9'££Z LS'Sb9'££Z OL8'Sb9'££Z- 0000'1 SOOZ/6Z/E :(II Z)ZS.LY1I W HSVD AHnSVS2LL SfI AZHG S SOOz/Sz/£ mwId SOOZ/SZ/£ -ZISdo([MITI :ZOI I ISLO3SDOLbzS80966 00'0 00'Z£L'966`E 00'Z£L`966'£- 000'Z£L'966'£- 0000'i SOOZ/8Z/£ :GI DSSJADIN HSVD AUnSVS2LL SfI3AaH(I S SOOz/Zz/E 00Y1IId SOOZ/ZZ/E -HadO QIfIbl'I :ZOI I ISLOdSDOLbZS80966 00'0 LS'ZZ9'160'Z LS'zz9'160`Z- OLS'zz9'160'Z- 0000'I SOOZ/ZZ/E :GI DSS.LYgDW HSVD ANfISVHH.L SfLdAaZIQ S SOOZ/L 1/£ 00YUCI-sad0 SOOZ/LI/£ WHZIONUI :ZOZZZSL03SOOLKS80966 00'0 SL'OOL'EEI SL'OOL'££I- 08L'004'EEI- 00001 SOOZ/LI/£ :GI DSS,LY IDIN HSVD ANnSVaN.L SfIdAHU(I S SOOZ/L 1/£ ODYgId SOOZ/LI/E -112d0QIROYI :ZOIIISLOdSOOLKS80966 00'0 E£'b90`8SE'zz ££'ti90'8S£'u- OEE'b90'8S£'ZZ- 0000'1 SOOZ/LI/E :QI DSSIYVDW HSVD ANfISVZHI SfMAHU(I S SOOZ/91/E 03YUCI-2I2d0 SOOZ/91/E MIS,L ONo"I :ZOZZZ5;40ASDOL17ZS80966 00'0 SL'6bS'6tC SL'6bS'6b£- OSL'6bS'6b£- 00001 SOOZ/91/£ :GI DSSJMDYg HSVD UMSVZH.L SndAMG S ague ague auge jud/ga'vqS som z3 awS aiva pavodag uopdpasaCI ad6y sso'I/upo Wx 4UTt0u1 ;803 aaTsd ague 04va 801as IIssy solid PK"n InuQ OPW.L SOOZ/I E/E - SOOZ/I/E 000010000800- a8n :AaII°uno owus 6ioft BC) uopousuwj, Aq papodag iwvam :M:Podaa IT$;aQ uopawwwj, aqUQ omaS lurnav f IrJUa4XaaA1 OOY41d SQOZ/OI/£ -SHdO MS.L flN0'I ZOZZZSLOdSOOAN'ONI SQQZ/i�i/£ SOSSJ.AOONIMHH'I TIHXOZIEII£9ZSOA10 =QI OHSSO/IO/£0 au S£OZ/IO/£0 SL'OSS't,I- SL'£69'£00'l £S't+['8I0'I- 000'000'OQO'1- 7176S£'00I SOoZ/Ol/£ %009'9 flJA dS VY1TNd 2Md OJ,JdY WOO S OOYITId S006/01/£ -HzdO YOZI ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOAN 'OD SOOZ/t�I/£ T SHOVS NIVWU'IOD--daXO2IH1£9ZSOd10 QIOSSSO/IO/£O QQ S£OZ/IO/£0 [b'Ib6'i,b- 81'76t,'600'£ 6S'££VbS0'£- 000'000'000'£- tl9I£'QOT SOOZ/OI/£ %OOS'S o1wasVNTNHWid OIL JAWWOO S 03 IId-2IHdO SOOZ/6Z/£YIR 'O'C I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOMHOA MaN'dVO SQOZ/SI/b HO[MNSH2ifl/HSVHO-daXO2ISSt+OS0310 =QI OH8S0/1040 QQ OZOZ/IO/t�0 OS'LS9'b£- 09'ZI£'S96'5; 00'000'000'9- 000'000'000'9- 61Zb'66 SOOZ/6Z/£ %OQO'S V.LW dS VY1TNd Hnd O.L LIWWOO S OOYVId-ZISdO 9006/81/£ WHU DNO'I ZQZZZSL03SDOC[HO,dMaS SOOZ/8[/b 'OZZ SHLLMDZS SSn--daxo?IHSt+0,30dIO QI OHSSO/IO/v0 QQ OZOZ/IO/b0 OS'ZIS'Z OS'ZI8'ZOO'£ 00'000'Q0O'£- 000'000'000'£- 8£60'00I SOOZ/81/£ %000'S flJ.I/1T dS VWNd HfId O.L,LIWINOO S o3wid-Had0 SOOZ/S I/£ WHZL flN0'I •ZOZZZSLOdSO03IHOA MaN'ONII S00Z/LT/£ 'IVJ.IdVO SAV'IONVH--daXO2IHL£bOSOd10 :(If OSSSO/I O/£0 QQ OZOZ/IO/£0 8£'6S8'S- LS'96L'IOS SZ'9S9'LOS- 000,000'003- t,6S£'QQI SOOZ/SI/£ %000'S `JJA dS VWNd 2lnd O,L.LMINOO S 2IV'I'IOa'8'II Saii.ana'da mtooNI claxia 84'O- 66'"VC88'9££ 86'696'0£8'9££- 06i'£8Z'*,OL'L££- :38V8 OMWIVAIna3 H8V3 19 HBVa'IVLOJ, Sti'o- 66'6bL'£88'9££ 86'696'O£8'9££- 061'£SS't OL'L££- -aV'I'IOa 'S n ad.H3'IVAIn63 HOVO+9 HSVO'IVJAU SOOZ/[£/£ OOINId-ZISdO SOOZ/T£/£ Y g.L DN0'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOb60L80966 00'0 SS'I L V I£ 88,I L I'I£- 088'I L I'1£- 0000'I SOOZ/I£/£ :QI OHsioaV J.ISOdHQ ASNow S.LV'I-J.(iSH S aria alma awes led/caisgS a;m2i 2m awes a;mQ Pavodav uol;duowaQ ad Al wool/uluo;am ;unourH ;wo'J aalld alms ova amag UW.L aaud I�o'I a;mQ aPmas .......... ...... ........ _ ._ ...._._._ ..... .............. _ 'IVNId :Wulns SOOZ/tE/E - SOOZ/I/£ OOOOi000D8a0-QSLMQI'I08A[Oa-Q8a0 a8n :Aauauna mug 6.io2ag8C) uol:lom uw j, Aq papodag WVUM =az podon IjB;aQ uol;ommwj, ...._................._.-... . ............... . -- .... .. .. .._...._.. _.__.._ . .. .. _ ££ awa amaS Tumw: zpuac:yloAj SOOZ/I/t, ODWM-2I2[dO SOOZ/OT/£ M3•I''DNO'I=ZOZZZSLOAS0 YY 0cFd0dV•LS SOOZ/LT/£ '�11 SaLLWIDas SRn dax0,dGcX vOObIE a1 OSS£0/10/10 Qa 8I OZ/I0/I O 00'0 b8'919 00'0 000'0 OLOZ'OOI SOOZ/OT/E 0/6000'S tUI89O#'I00d VWN.d 81 SOOZ/I/b 0OY1IId-2IHd0 SOOZ/OI/E Mal 0N(yI:zOzzzSLOdS30cIH0dmjS SQQZ/L[/E 'M11 SHLLMOSS SEM 2ISx0H8E`JcNVQObI£ QI OSSEO/I0/to ca Si OZ/I0/I0 SZ'I90`EEZ 8S'69VtVZ- ObL'6LS'ZEZ- OLOZ'00I SOOZ/OI/£ %OOO'S 17LL1890#'I00d VWNd 8 s SOOZ/I/b OOYQId-2ISdO SOOZ/OT/£ Ma JNO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSOOQZI0dwvjS SOOZ/L[/£ �ll SSLLINfloas sEn aaxo2Ig£XY�IVOQbT£ QI OSSEO/10/10 au SI OZ/I0/to 00'0 bb'ZZZ'Z 00'0 000'0 OLOZ'OOI SOOZ/OI/£ %000'S -FLM990#'I00d VYgN.d SI .S00Z/I/b MWId-2ISdO SOOZ/OT/E Ma JNO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSO0c1H0•wvjS SOOZ/LI/£ '07'I SSLLI2If1Os8 Sen --HHx02ISEXYNVOObI£ QI OSSEO/I0/TO au 8TOZ/TO/IO ES'S61'9- 8I'OLI`ZQO`I IO'99E'LOO'T- 099'660'000'I- OLOZ'QOI SOOZ/01/£ %000'S bLL1890#'I00d WiNd S SOOZ/I/b OOYUd-HadO SOOZ/OT/E MS'L1DNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSO0c1H0Awv1,S SOOZ/LI/E ,3q,I SSLLrdrIOSS SEM-daXOHEIR 11,16£i£ (II OSSZO/TO/ZI au 81OZ/10/10 00'0 1Z'0E8`1 00'0 OOO'O OLOZ'OOI SOOZ/OI/£ %000'S I999L90#1I00d VINNd SI .S00Z/I/b 0OYIIId-2I3d0 SOOZ/OT/£ Mal 0N0'I =ZOZZZSL0ASO0C1H0dmjS SOOZ/Li/£ O'IZ SSI.LI2Tf10SS SSfl-d3X021G8'LU16UIE :QI 0aSZ0/I0/Z I Qa 81 OZ/10/I O Z8'8LZ'b OS'L6Z'SZ8 7.E'9LS'6ZS- OIb'Z6S'EZ8- OLOZ'OOI SOOZ/OI/£ %OOO'S TS99L90#'I00d VWNA S OOMd-2I3d0 SOOZ/8/£ Ma'ON01=ZOZZZSLOdSDOCIHOAMJS SOOZ/6/£ O'IZ S21112 IMS SHn 2THIO2IOZXf`Y1I6SEI£ QI OSSIO/ZZ/90 as 900Z/9I/90 00'0 00'OSZ'OI 1 00'0 000'0 OLSO'ZOI SO06/8/£ %OSZ'S SOSU NSSV DJM'LLVN WHSQS3 SI SOOZ/8/£ YMS•L ONO'I•ZOZZZSL03S00CIH09WV•LS SOOZ/6/£ 'O'I'I SSLLrdf1OSS SEM dSX02IHZXrW6SEIE QI OSSIO/ZZ/90 QQ 900Z/9T/90 00'OZ£'6t, 00'OEI'SSI'6 00'0I8`S£I'6- 000'000'000'6- OLSO'ZOI SOOZ/8/E %OSZ'S SEMI NSSV DJM'I.LVN'IV2 MSA S DIME[ o"a *sell jud/I81U[S aqua zz aws am pavodam u0nduasaa adA, I9011/ul8o 42M ;unouiv 4800 solid eggs aqua DrUes UW L solid 19007 avea Dpwi. ............................. -- Zvmdl.4mine SOOZ/i S/S - SOOZ/1/E 00001000DWJ0-(FELYU E N CKO-aSOo asa :sououna wue Szogai8a uopassuml Sq papodag eavee� :ai<uod� nl�aQ uo��assa$iy t£ amQ QTPOS TBn1oV; tpuagxaOm 03YUCI-213d0 SOOZ/OI/E MEL flNiO'I�ZOZZZSL03S0002iO.dDwas SOOZ/L T/E `O'I'I SSIJ anosS sEm 2IzIO2IH6AITQSOb I E QI OSStO/IO/LO QQ 6IOZ/i0/LO 00'0 86*6II'i 00'0 000'O OLOZ'OOI S00Z/Oi/E %QQO'S S6£98LO#'IOOd VIHNT3 SI 00wid-212d0 SOOZ/QI/E WHZIOMO'I:ZOZZZSLOdSOOCrdOdMJS SOOZ/Li/E 'O'I'I SSLLRMOSS SSA-dHXO IH6nnGSObIE QI 02SVO/I O/LO QQ 61 OZ/T 0/LO SL'LS9'Z- ZL'ZEO'S0S 4t'069'LOS- QOE'686'EOS- OLOZ'OQI SOOZ/Oi/E %000'9 S6E98LO#'I00d V➢1lNid S 00YUCI-mad0 SOOZ/OI/E , ➢1RTSIONIO'I :ZOZZZSLO,dS3OcrdOdKvjS SOQZ/L[/E O'I'I SSLLRIIIOSS SSII -dZXO2iH8EHSSObIE QIaSStO/IO/QT Q06[OZ/TO/QI 00'0 E['61I'I 00'0 000'0 OLOZ'00I 9006/0I/E 0/0000'S OSZtBLQ#'IOOd VINNid Si 00wid-Nad0 SOOZ/QI/E YMS.L ONIO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOClHOd nNJS SOOZ/L I/E �Z saixi I[TOSS sEn-daxoua8£HSSOt I E QI OSStO/I Not QQ 61 OZ/10/0I tL'SS9'Z- I4'099't09 St'90E'409- 080'809'EOS- OLQZ'OOT SOOZ/0[/£ %OQO'S OSZt8LO#'I00d VWNi3 S OaIHId-USdO SOQZ/OT/E D aL ONIO'I'ZOZZZS403S0002I0dM S 'O'I' SQQZ/LI/E I saumnoas sun -daxoue6wovsObIE :at OSStO/I O/OI QQ 61 OZ/I0/01 QO'0 t0'LOI'I 00'0 000'0 OLOZ'QO[ SOOZ/0[/E %Q00'S t0EE8LO#'IOOd V➢HNId SI OOIAIId-H2dO SOOZ/OI/E MSJ,ONIO'I:ZOZZZSL03S3OCrdOdWVJS SOOZ/LI/E OZZ SSLLIZinoss san-d3XO'TS6WDVSObIV Qi O3St0/10/0I Q(I 61OZ/10/01 LO'LZ9'Z- Et'IOZ'66t OS'8Z8'[OS- 090'OLI'86t- OLOZ'001 SQOZ/0[/E %000'5; t0£E840#100d VFgNd S s SOQZ/[/t OONIId-2ISd0 SOOZ/QI/E , Mal lE)NT0'I•ZOMMOdSOO(INOAMILS SOOZ/LI/E OZ1 SSLLrzmozS SEEM-daxO, lcXKvoObIV at Dam/IO/TO QQ 8IOZ/IO/10 QO'0 KUC 00'0 000'0 OLOZ'001 SQQZ/OI/E %000'S tLLI890#'IOOd VWNLd Si s SOOZ/[/t OOYNId-2TSdO SOOZ/0[/E M&L ONi(YI :ZOZZZSLO.dSOOCrdOa NVJS SOOZ/LI/E OZZ SSLLRI ms San:2TS}IOxSc)cKv00tIE QI Dam/IO/IO au BTOZ/IQ/IO OO'Li6- E8'Z48'9LI E8'68L'44I- QOt'LOS'9L[- OLOZ'00[ SOOZ/QI/E %000'S tLLI890#'I00d VDQNT3 S alms alms asses "d/saMRS awn zz alas alma pavodax .. uopdpwaa eddy g8c'I/ulso;aK ;mtolcmv ;soa aapj alms a;ma auras UW L 001id POWI a;ma apmsy _ ....... __. _.._ ..._ _.._....... _ zvmi a Soot/left - SOOZ/l/E wool 0000soo-as mmamoo-asap asn :&===a mme dxoRa;8a aol;om mwj, Aq papodag sovams �M:Podvu Ilulaa uopam mwj, I............ _._ .. . ... .. . ...... .. ........... . _. ._.................. ....... ..... _._.... . . ....__. Transaction Detail Report M. »A09 Reported by Transaction Category Dam Currency: USD oCSD4D0 0LfjM1 3D-oa8000010000 3/1/200S - 3/31/200S Status:FINAL Trade Date Local Price Tin Settle Date Base Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss TYPe Description Reported Date Base Ex Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base S FNMA POOL#0789135 5.000% 3/10/2005 100.2070 -501,282.600 -504,963.89 502,320.41 -2,643.48 08/01/2019 DD 08/01/04SECID: 3/17/2005 31405GV49BROKER UBS SECURITIES LLC, 3/10/2005 STAMFORDOCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IS FNMA POOL#0789135 5.000% 3/10/2005 100,2070 0.000 0.00 1,113.96 0.00 08/01/2019 DD 08/01/04SECID: 3/17/2005 31405GV49BROKER: UBS SECURITIES LLC, 3/10/2005 STAMFORDOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S FNMA POOL#0789893 5.0000/a 3/10/2005 100.2070 -517,934.480 -521,738.07 519,006.77 -2,731.30 10/01/2019 DD 10/01/04SEC ID: 3/17/2005 31405HRNOBROKER UBS SECURITIES LLC, 3/10/2005 STAMFORDOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IS FNMA POOL#0789893 5.0000/a 3/10/2005 100.2070 0.000 0.00 1,150.97 0.00 10/01/2019DD 10/01/04SEC ID: 3/17/2005 31405HRNOBROKER UBS SECURITIES LLC, 3/10/2005 STAMFORDOCSF07522202: LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO S FNMA POOL#0792079 5.000% 3/10/2005 100.2070 -501,962.250 -505,648.53 503,001.46 -2,647.07 10/01/2019 DD 10/01/04SEC ID: 3/17/2005 31405K6Q913ROKER UBS SECURITIES LLC, 3/10/2005 STAMFORDOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IS FNMA POOL#0792079 5.000% 3/10/2005 100.2070 0.000 0.00 1,115.47 0.00 10/01/2019 DD 10/01/04SECID: 3/17/2005 31405K6Q9BROKER: UBS SECURITIES LLC, 3/10/2005 STAMFORDOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S FNMA POOL#0793974 5.000% 3/10/2005 100.2070 -496,105.380 -499,748.65 497,132.47 -2,616.18 02/01/2020 DD O1/O1/05SECID, 3/17/2005 31405NCK9BROKER:UBS SECURITIES LLC, 3/10/2005 STAMFORDOCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IS FNMA POOL#0793974 5.000% 3/10/2005 100.2070 0.000 0.00 1,102.46 0.00 02/01/2020 DD 01/O1/05SECID: 3/17/2005 31405NCK913ROKER UBS SECURITIES LLC, 3/10/2005 STANFORDOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO Workbench *Actual Settle Date 35 • 9E 2wQ aP IOS ignlob'x lima"Jom OOYITId-2ISdO SOOZ/0I/E MH'LDNIO'I:ZOZZZSL03SOOQ2IO-dINVJ.S SOOZ/LI/£ 'O'1'I SZLLMOaS SSn -d2XOZISGSZASO17TE :QI OHSVO/T0/I I QQ 61 OZ/IO/I T 00'0 Ot'STI`I 00'0 000'0 OLOZ'OOI SOOZ/oI/£ %000'S S£9EOSo#'100d VYiNLd S1 OOYQId-2IHdO SOOZ/OT/E Mai SOOZ/LT/£ '�ISZLLMOSSSHn -dZX02igO8ZASObi£ QI OZSt0/I O/I I QQ 6I OL/I0/T T 68'9t9'Z- S6'896`ZM tS'S19'9OS- 06L'6Z6'1O5;- OLOZ'OOI SOOZ/0I/E %OQO'S S£9£OSO# 100d VY1iNId S 03YQ1d-Had0 SOOZ/OI/E M&L DNTO'I 'ZOZZZSL03S0002I0AMJS S00Z/L I/£ 'O'I'I S3LLRInoas San -dHxO2IH£}I11ASOt I£ Q1 OSSSO/I O/ZO QQ OZOZ/I O/ZO 00,0 L6'901'I 00'0 000'0 OLOZVOL SOOZ/OI/£ 0/o000'S t6Z£OSO#100d VINNd S1 OOYQId-sadO SOOZ/0I/£ Mal ONIO'I :ZOZZZSL03SOOcrdOdTNVJS SOOZ/LT/£ 'OZZ SZLLRInOSS SSn -daXO- SCXNIASObI£ QI OHSSO/I O/ZO as OZOZ/IO/ZO 68'9Z9'Z- t0'691'66t E6'S6L'I08- obL'L£I'86t- OLOZ'001 SOOZ/OT/£ 0/9000'9 t6ZE0SO#'IOOd VFWd S OOYgId-21adO SOOZ/OI/£ Mal'DNO'I 'ZOZZ NI ZSLOdSOOCrdOdVJS SOOZ/LI/£ O I SaLLMOSS SHn ZIaIOII8OWEIfISObIE QI OSStO/T O/11 QQ 61 OZ/10/I I 00'0 I£'EOI'I 00'0 000'0 OLOZ'OOT SOOZ/OT/E 0/6000'S tt£66LO#'100d VWNd S1 OOYIIId-NSdO S006/ol/E MS'T'DNOI :ZOZZZSLOdSOOQ2IOdIgVJS SOOZ/LI/E 'OZZ SaLLRmoas San ZIaIO2Ia0INansobI£ Q1OSSt0/I0/II aa6IOZ/TO/1I ZZ8T9'Z- Z£'6IS'L6t tS'LEI'OOS- 0£t'I6t'96t- OLOZ'001 SOOZ/OT/E %000'S ttE66LO#'I00d VWNd S OOYHId-2IadO S006/01/E MZZ ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOCPdOiBWJS SOOZ/LT/E 'OZZ SSLLRInoas sm-2Ia1021 wixOSotl£ :(II OSSt0/I O/11 QQ 6IOZ/IO/ZI 00'0 6E'SI1'[ 00'0 000'0 OLOZ'OOT SOOZ/OT/E %OOO'S ESE96L0#'I00d VWNd SI 0OWId-2ISdO SOOZ/OI/E MH'I'ONIO'I =ZOZZZSLOdSOOQ2I0.3INV.LS SOOZ/L I/£ `O'I'I SSLLRIfIOSS San -Hsxo Eu ixaSot T£ :QI OHSt0/TO/11 QQ 6IOZ/TO/ZI LS'9179'Z- ZT't96`ZOS 66'O19'909- 086'tZ6'TOS- OLOZ'OOT SOOZ/OI/£ %OOO'S £8£96Lo#'100d VWNd S eggs eggs alias xvd/sajuIS awn za ayes awe pavodag uapdpasaQ uwj, �o'I/�gD ION �unota� ;god O*iJd 0098 04gQ OF4408 >aBaZ eaNd I1201i Diva DPWZ ... .................... . .. ...._ _..._ SOOZ/TS/E - Soot/t/E 000m000soo- agn :A==na mms 6zoRa:jgC) uo1gowmux L 6q papodag wVEW :M:Podou �B�aQ ao�;assas�y L£ aka areas teTUaV; t{aust�llDM 00wid-Hado SOOZ/OT/E WH8'I'ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOASO0crHOAMIS SOOZ/LT/£ ��'j b-aLLMOSS SSA-daXO Ig8S�I9Oi7IE aI OSSSO/To/to as ozoZ/Io/to 00'0 66'61I'T 00'0 000'0 OLOZ'OOI SOOZ/OT/E %000'S 6b611800'I00d VNISM Si OOINId-Hado SOOZ/OI/E WHS'I'ONO'I •ZOZZZSLOSSOOcrdOA � IS SOOZ/L T/£ OZZ S31d.RITIOSS sEn-damISSSEX90b IV aI OSSSO/I0/I0 as OZOZ/t0/TO SL'LS9'Z- SI'LEO'SOS 96+69'LOS- 09L'£66'£OS- OLOZ'OOT SOOZ/OI/£ %000'S 6b6I180#100d VWM S 00YHId-2TSdo OZ/OI/£ LLRImzI'DNO'I :ZOZZZS Hd L03SOOcrdOdI ,LS SO Sou 'on SSnoas sEn-daxozISbZ?pgoi7IE /LI/£ aI OSSSO/TO/I0 as OZOZ/IO/ZO 00'0 90'LOI'i 00'O 000'0 OLOZ'OOI SOOZ/01/E 0/0000'S E196080#'IOOd VYM SI OOYYId-Endo OOZ/oI/E WHS1'ONort •ZOZZZSL03SOOcrmO,IYV,LS S Sooz/LT/£ OZZ SaLLMC)SS SEM ZTHIO2IStiZSD90bt£ aIaasso/TO/TO as OZOZ/Io/Zo 60'LZ9'Z- ZI'90Z'66b IZ'£E8'TOS- Ot'L'j7LI'86b- OLOZ'OOi S006/0I/£ 0/6000-S E196080#'I00d VYW S 00YUCI-11ado SOOZ/OT/£ MITI'IDN0'I :ZOZZZSL03SOOCrdOd IS SOOZ/LI/E �01'I SELLRMOSS SEM-daxOHSZf1wA9ObIE at OaSSO/t0/ZO as ozoz/IO/EO 00'0 STb'80I'T 00'0 000'0 OLOZ'OOi SOOZ/OI/£ 0/0000'S TL98080#'IOOd VWNA SI Oowld-2Isdo SOOZ/OT/£ Y�ss ONO'I :ZOZZZSL03SOOcrdOd�IV,LS S00Z/LI/£ O'I'I SSLLmoss sEn-daxozISZAY�I390bTE aI Dam/IO/ZO as ozoz/IO/£O SJ7'O£9'Z- LZ'6b8'66-� SL'6Lt,'ZOS- 093'9I8'86t,- OLOZ'001 SOOZ/OT/E %000'S IL98080#'IOOd vwNd S OOYHId-Hado SOOZ/O[/£ WHZL ONO'I �ZOZZZSLOASOOGHOd IVJS SOOZ/LT/£ ,om saardmas san-.xaxouEu7p I090,i£ (II OaStO/IO/ZI as 6IOZ/TO/ZI 00'0 Sb'ILO'I 00'0 000"0 OLOZ'QOt SOOZ/oT/£ 0/000'S E809080#'IOOd VwNd SI 00wId-2ISdo SOOZ/oI/£ ms'L ON0'I •ZOZZZSLoAS3OCrdOdY1 IS SOOZ/LI/£ OZZ s'3LLRmoss sEn-daxomatodc)gobI£ aI OSSb0/10/ZT as 61OZ/10/ZT L9'ZbS'Z- 98'Z9I'E8b ES'SOL'SSb- oE9't9I'ZSb- OLOZ'00I SOOZ/OI/E °/a00o'S £809o80#'IOOd VwNd S aasg - aasg - aseg "d/aallIB ava Na OIMH awa pavodam -- -uo'ildpasaa add, sso'I/ulSD lam 4unourtl 1800 solid ame a;Ba away uw, *DIM IBao►I a;sa apsi, zvNI,a:4949 SOOZ/i S/S - SOOZ/T/E 0000100001M-muval oanro"930 rift :Aou'urta'ma Sio$a;sa uopaummtj Aq papodag Wvam :az poaom Os�aQ uopa8savjy 8£ ;0qUa allPa8 TBnlaV; x�uac��o�y OOINId-HHdO SOOZ/OI/£ ME'UNO'I•ZOZZZSLOddS30crd0A vjS SoOZ/LI/£ 'Zn'l SSLLRIfIOHS SHA-daMOUSIHd➢1I90bI£ aI OSSSO/I O/zO QQ OZOz/I0/i 0 00'0 86'898 00'0 000'0 OLOZ'OOI SOOz/OI/E 0/bo00'S Z£IbISO#'IOOd WOO SI O3WId-2I21dO Soot/oT/£ Mal,rJNO'I 'ZOZZZSL03S0OONOdiNvLS S00Z/LI/£ 'O'Il S'3LLRMOSs SHf1 2IHIOUEIIHd1I9Obi£ al OSSSO/I O/z0 as OZOz/to/to 6S'601'Z- L9'L98'QOb 9Z'LL6'zOb- O4t,'6E0'0017- OLOZ'OQI SOOZ/QI/£ %OOO'S Z£It,I80#100d HINN3 S F SOON I/b 03WId-HHdO SOOZ/0I/£ 211lDN0'I :ZOZZZSL03S30CIm0A JS SOOZ/L[/£ ` Y1O'I'I SdLLRIfIOSS SEM -daXONE196HIN9ObI£ alaasso/Io/zo as ozoz/To/zo 00'0 tbb'ZZZ'z 00'0 000'0 04OZ'001 SOOZ/0[/£ %OQO'S tl9L£T80#'I00d VwNd SI S00Z/I/b 03wid-2IsdO SOOZ/ol/£ M211 flN0`I•ZOZZZSLOdS30C[H0A VJS SQOz/LT/£ 'O l SSLLRIIIOHS Sffn--dZXOHE196HW90bI£ of O3SS0/I O/zO QQ OZOZ/IO/ZO E8'96I'S- 9£'oLI'z0o'T 6I'99£'L00'[- Ob8'660'000'I- OLOZ'001 SOOZ/OI/E 0/0Q0'S b9LE[SO#'IOOd VWN3 S *.SOOZ/I/J7 00wid-NadO SOoz/OI/£ O'I'Mal ONO'I 'ZOZZZSL03SOOCIHO4mviS SOOz/LI/E I SaLLRi oss san -da IO2iH96aKgob[£ al Dasso TO/z0 QQ OZOZ/IO/ZO 00'0 09'SOL'I 00'0 000'0 OLOZ'OOI S006/01/£ %OQO'S b9LEI8Q#'I00d VWNd SI s SOOz/I/b OOYHId-HadO SOQZ/OI/EO'I'➢051b ONO'I 'ZOZzzSL03S0Ocrd0A vjS SOQz/LI/£ i sswanass san-damo IH9 EmobI£ (It Dasso/[0/ZO QQ OZOZ/IO/z0 TS'L86'E- 80'60I'69L 6S'96O'£44- 080'OZS'L9L- OLOZ'00I SQOZ/OI/E %OOO'S b9LE[80#100d VWN3 S 03WId-213dO SOOZ/OI/E Nu8'L lDNm:ZOzzz9zOAS0OO2iOdmlS SQOZ/L[/E 'O'I,I SaLLIamas Sm -dax0 IHO0a'I9Obi£ =ai aasso/i o/I o as ozoz/I o/I o 00'0 4b'z01'1 00'0 000'O OLOZ'OOI SOoz/OT/E %000'S E06ZISO#7OOd VWN3 SI OOLYId-HHdO SOOZ/OI/£ MNJ'ONO'I 'ZOzzzSLOASO0cr80dWvj.S SQOZ/LI/£ O'I'I saamnass san 2IH}IOmeom'I9obI£ aiamsso/to/T0 as ozoz/to/To IZ'919'z- tb9'L£T'L6b S8'£SL'6617- 0179'0I['96b- OLOz'OOT SOOZ/o[/E %OOO'S £06ZI8O#7OOd WiNd S mma a>sBH a H ilid/vam48 cqum xa alms awsa pavudam uopdpasa(I addy 09011/UI8'D 3un0u1 :1903 aalsd ama QWG aD;ag tasiZ amid Moll agsQ opwil - . . .... .......... ........... ---- . _ SOOZ/TE/E - SOOZ/T/E 00001000090O-alUVUM8I1T0O W0 asa :"manna mma 9xo2a:j8C) uoj:jowmvj L ,&q Pwpodam sm�se� :�� Os}aQ uo��assussy ..... ... ...... Transaction Detail Report m: EWBAM Reported by Transaction Category sass currency: 1181) 0CSD-00N90LIDA2ZD-OCSOOOO 10000 3/1/2005 - 3/31/2005 affitm:FINAL Trade Date Local Price Tran Settle Date Base Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Ex Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base S U S TREASURY NOTES 3.375% 12/15/2008 3/8/2005 98.1016 -12,600,000.000 -12,460,397.73 12,360,796.88 -99,600.85 DD 12/15/03SEC ID:912828BT613ROKER. 3/9/2005 GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NYOCSF07522202: 3/8/2005 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IS U STREASURY NOTES 3.375% 12/15/2008 3/8/2005 98.1016 0.000 0.00 98,134.61 0.00 DD l2/15/03SEC ID:912828BT6BROKER: 3/9/2005 GOLDMAN SACHS&CO,NYOCSFD7522202: 3/8/2005 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S U S TREASURY NOTES 2.375%08/31/2006 3/31/2005 98.2344 -2,400,000.000 -2,387,775.48 2,357,625.00 -30,150.48 DD 08/31/04SEC ID: 912828CU2BROKER 3/31/2005 UBS SECURITIES LLC, 3/31/2005 STAMFORDOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO is U S TREASURY NOTES 2.375%08/31/2006 3/31/2005 98.2344 0.000 0.00 4,801.63 0.00 DD 08/31/04SEC ID:912828CU213ROKER: 3/31/2005 UBS SECURITIES LLC, 3/31/2005 STAMFORDOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S U S TREASURY NOTES 3.500%l2/15/2009 3/8/2005 97.6875 -14,000,000.000 -13,772,754.80 13,676,250.00 -96,504.80 DD 12/15/04SEC ID:912828DE7BROKER 3/9/2005 LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202:3/8/2005 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO is U S TREASURY NOTES 3.500%12/15/2009 3/8/2005 97.6875 0.000 0.00 113,076.92 0.00 DD 12/15/04SEC ID:912828DE7BROKER: 3/9/2005 LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC, NYOCSF07522202:3/8/2005 LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S U S TREASURY NOTES 3.500% 12/15/2009 3/11/2005 97.0352 -14,000,000.000 -13,772,754.80 13,584,921.88 -187,832.92 DD 12/15/04SEC ID:912828DE7BROKEP- 3/14/2005 CHASE SECURITIES,NEW 3/11/2005 YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- PIMCO is US TREASURY NOTES 3.500%12/15/2009 3/11/2005 97.0352 0.000 0.00 119,807.69 0.00 DD 12/15/04SEC ID:912828DE713ROKER: 3/14/2005 CHASE SECURITIES,NEW 3/11/2005 YORKOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER- PIMCO Workbench Actual Settle Date 39 . .............. --- Transaction Detail Report ID: EW13A09 Reported by Transaction Category ease C„rre„err. USD 0c8D-'OINe0ZJ=2ZD-OCSOM10000 3/1/2005 - 3/31/2005 States:FINAL Trade Date Local Price Tran Settle Date Base Price cost Amount Net Gain/Loss TMW Description Reported Date Base Ex Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base S U S TREASURY NOTES 3.500% 12/15/2009 3/14/2005 96.9487 -14,000,000.000 -13,584,375.00 13,572,815.34 -11,559.66 DD l2/15/04SEC ID:912828DE7BROKER: 3/31/2005 MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SMITH INC 3/14/2005 NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IS U S TREASURY NOTES 3.500%12/15/2009 3/14/2005 96.9487 0.000 0.00 142,692.31 0.00 DD 12/15/04SEC ID: 912828DE7BROKER 3/31/2005 MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SMITH INC 3/14/2005 NYOCSF07522202: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO TOTAL FIRED INCOME SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR -91,901,234.920 -91,186,096.12 91,263,777.71 -538,639.88 TOTAL FIRED INCOME SECURITIES BASE: -91,901,234.920 -91,186,096.12 91,263,777.71 -538,639.88 TOTAL SALES BASE: -429,605,518.110 -428,017,066.10 428,147,527.70 -538,640.33 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FIRED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR PD WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000-11150 7.500% 3/l/2005 100.0000 -854.740 -836.18 854.74 18.56 12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99SECID: 3/1/2005 302998GE30CSF07522202: LONGTERM 3/1/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/28/2Q05* PDC FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 A VAR RT 2/1/2005 100.0000 17,276.450 17,294.86 -17,276.45 18.41 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/97SECID: 2/l/2005 3133TCE950CSF07522202:LONGTERM 3/1/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/15/2005 PD FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 A VAR RT 2/l/2005 100.0000 -17,276.450 -17,294.85 17,276.45 -18.40 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/97SECID: 2/1/2005 3133TCE950CSF07522202:LONGTERM 3/1/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/21/2005 Workbench *Actual Settle Date 40 i 09UQ aTuaS IlMlW. uauagxjoAl .SOOZ/ST,/£ /I/£ ��Hdd0 SOOZ 9006/I/£ Y� HlONO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSO09bd'ITLEIE :QI Osseo/i0/II Ga SIOZ/IO/ZI Ib'SSI- E6'6ZI'ZI b£'SSZ'ZI- Q£6'6ZItI- 0000'00I SOOZ/I/£ %QOO'S L86bSZO#'I00d VINNd (Id .SOOZ/SZ/£ OZ/I/£ OOINId-2I3d0 SOW MHlONO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSOOIZS'IILEIE :QI OzS£0/INOT QQ 81OZ/IO/II 9Z'b8- b8'ti£Z'ti 0I'68Z't,- Ob8'b£Z`b- 0000*00I SOOZ/I/E %OOO'S ES6-PSZO#'IOOd VINNd (Id .SOOZ/SZ/£ 03INId-2I2dO 9006/I/E M31ONO'I :ZOZZZS4OdSOOEHO'II4EIE Sow/I/E :(It 03S£0/I0/80 QQ 81 OZ/10/60 ZS'IZ IE'LIL E8'8E4- OI£'LIL- 0000'00I SQOZ/I/E 0/6000'S 998bSZ0#'I00d VINNd Qd .SQOZ/SZ/E OOINId-HSdO SQOZ/I/E M31ONO'I:ZOZZZSLOdSO06ASXI LEI E SOOZ/I/E :QIOSSEO/IQ/SO QQ STOZ/I0/90 I0'Sb I E'OOS'I ZE'SbS'I- OI E'OOS`I- 0000*00I SOOZ/I/£ %000'S 09Lt SZQ#'IOOd VINNd Qd .SOOZ/SZ/£ S OOINId-2Idd0 OOZ/I/E S00Z/i/E M2,LDNO'I'ZOZZZSLOdSOOLt�AXILEI£ :(It OdSEO/I0/to ac BIOZ/I O/ZO 69'9L- bZ'9SS'Z E6'ZE9'Z- ObZ'9SS`Z- 0000'00I SQOZ/i/E 0/0000'S IE9bSZO#'I00d V➢1iNd Qd .SOOZ/SZ/£ /I/£ OOINId-2ISd0 SOOZ9006/i/E Md'I'ONO'I:ZOZZZSLQdS00t, AXIL£I£ :(It OdSZO/10/0I as LIOZ/IO/I I 69'90E- Z6'ZZZ'OI I9'6ZS'OI- OZ6'ZZZ`OI- 0000'00I SOOZ/I/E %000'9 OISbSZO#'IOOd VINNd Qd SOOZ/I/E OOINId-HadO SOOZ/I/£ D z.L ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOO£ZAAS8bEIE :(It 3dSL6/I O/Z I QQ SZOZ/10/10 Zb'ZZ 98'6I6 WL68- 098'6I6- 0000'00I SQOZ/I/E %b8E'9 b909-SL#dflONO OIN'IHd (Id S00Z/i/E 03WId-2I3d0 SQQZ/I/£ IN291IDNO'I•ZOZZZSLOdS30S633.LEEi£ :QI OdSL6/IO/ZI QQ ZEOZ/SI/80 LZ'£I- 08'SSt'ZI LO'69b'ZI- OOS'SSt"zi- 0000'00I SOOZ/I/E LH HVA V Ea HHS OJA SSV'IOLL'MW OINIHd Qd g — —ate -- a ug Zvd/9anq8 aqua 2m Doug a;eQ Papodau uopduaaaa adSL soot/uluJ 48g Junoury ;ooa aaf=d Doug 038Q ORPS Ulu L "lid Moll D;BQ opwi. zvxcg:o<n�s SOOZ/T E/S - SOOZ/T/S 0000t 0000soo-oszvai7osNoo-asw asa :A=tea mus Alo2alva uopossusij, Aq papodag WVRM M podag nine([ uoPas MWI �Q aT37aS I�1�V• a Soot/St/£ SOOZ/I/E MZL VN0'I:zozzzSLOdS009mExS8£1£ SOOt/I/£ :al 0SSE0/TO/170 au 810Z/IO/SO LS'S- �S'b£fi I I'0"- ovs,vcb- 0000'001 SOOZ/I/£ 0/0000'S ESbSSSO#'IOOd VwNd Cid •SOOZ/SZ/E 00wid-2ISd0 soot/I/E M31ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSJOIASAASSEIE SOOZ/I/E :QiOSS£O/IO/£O QQ 81OZ/10/1170 S8'ZSI- 176'b60'S 6L'LbZ'S- Ob6't,60'9- 0000*001 SOOZ/I/E 0/0000'S £9ES880#'i00d VYHNd Qd ;Soot/St/£ SOOt/I/£ OOiAiid-2ISd0 SOoZ/I/E MST ON0'I :ZOZZZSL0dS008aZAt8EI£ QI OSSOO/IO/LO as 91Ot/10/90 SS'ZZI- 8t'I8L't E8'£06'Z- OSZ'18L'Z- 0000'00I SOOZ/I/E %000'9 IStSESo#'IOOd VwNd ad •SOoz/St/£ SOOZ/[/£ OOL4Id-?ISdO M SOOZ/T/£ al ONO'I •ZOZZZSLOdS30OAAS0£8£I£ QI OSS66/I0/60 QQ bI OZ/IN60 i7L'bE- b17'88L 81'EZS- OWSSL- 0000'001 SOOZ/T/E 0/vOOO'9 6b96090#'IOOd VINNd Qd •Soot/SZ/£ OOZ/I/£ OOYQId-2ISd0 Sot S /I/E Y HJ.DN0'i :ZOZZZSLOdsD0zjO0I8EI£ QI OSS66/IO/ZO QQ VIOZ/IO/ZO iL'6E- 81'I06 69*0176- 081'106- 0000'001 Sooz/I/E 0/*000'9 Z8b9StO#'I00d VNINd Qd •SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/I/£ ��-2iSd0 D1 SOOZ/1/£ HIVNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOILVX9L£IE aI 02SE0/T O/60 QQ 81 OZ/10/60 b9'Z8I- SZ'tEZ'9I 68'91V9I- oSZ'bEZ'9I- 0000'00I soot/I/E %OOO'S oEbLS£0#'IOOd VNINd ad •SoOZ/SZ/£ SOOt/I/£ 00DHId-UadO SOOZ/T/£ Mal •ZOZZZSL03S008INj7f'9LEIE QI OSSEO/IO/10 as SIOZ/TO/TO SO'ZI- STIob ETCH- OSS'106- 0000"001 SOOZ/T/E 0/0000'S SZELS£0#'IOOd VwNd (Id •SOOZ/St/£ SOOZ/T/E 00YHId-2ISd0 SOo /I/E Mal ON0'I •ZOZZZSLOdS00OINZ.UL£I E QI 0SS66/10/60 QQ bIOZ/I O/t0 68'tZi- b6'SSL'Z £8'I 16'Z- Ob6'SSL'Z- 0000'001 SOOZ/I/E 0/0000'9 086£ZE0#lood VwNd (ld ama rive aasg xvd/sa=8g8 aiva za ass aiBa Pa:pod-,a ual;dp=r-M addy soon/um 40K :IunoiuV 4800 aal=d *sea ai8a auras UW1 001=d porn viva apwj. ....... ...... .._.__ __ _._ _.... soot/left - 900Z/i/E 00001000DBO-o L asa :I'uO =o*me Axo2a48C) uol;ommwj, Aq papodag 6ovamm .ax poaon TFB�aQ uol�assussy £� 7Wa aT-WaS WMW zpuaq3ijoZA .s00Z/Sz/E SOOz/I/£ OOiNId-2I�dO soot/I/£ MS'I DNO'I :ZOZZZSL03SOOL8ddOOt,I£ :(II OSSEO/10/Eo as SIOz/TO/£0 tlZ,09I- suln'S Zb'TOs`s- o8vin's- 0000'OOI S006/I/£ %OQO'S SI£9890#100d VWNd ad .Sooz/Sz/E SOOZ/I/E ZAOOYQId-2ISdO s00z/I/E Mal •ZOZZZSLOdSOOZAH0obT£ :aI OZS£Q/I O/zo as 81 Oz/Io/zo 84'8- I8'Z6Z 6S'TOE- 019'Z6z- 0000*001 SOW I/E 0/6000'S S99S890#'I00d V➢1iNd ad f s00z/sz/£ 00wid 2ISdO SOOZ/I/£ Mal ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOSSOOLHOSOObT£ SOW I/E :(II OSSEO/I O/£0 as SI OZ/I O/£o 48'9z- EZ'L60% 0I'tZI'z- 0£Z'L60'Z- 0000*001 Sam/1/E %000'S OOZS890#'IOOd VWNA ad s SOOz/sz/E 500Z/T/£ OOINId-2ISdO 9006/T/E MSIUNO'I •ZOZZZSL03SO0IZIEQQObi£ :(II OSSEO/IO/SO as SIOz/TO/90 86'9b- Z6'999'E 06'ETL'E- OZ6'999'£- 0000*001 SOOZ/I/£ %000-S S06b890#'I00d V➢HNd ad ;SOOZ/SZ/E SOOZ/I/£ OOYHId-2ISdO s00z/i/E Mal UNO'I •ZOZZZSL03SOOI.LbA16£I£ :aT OSS£O/I O/10 as 8I Oz/IO/z0 08-9z- Z£'£68 ZT'Oz6- OZE'E68- 0000'001 SOOT./I/£ %000'S KC1890#100d VWN3 ad .SOOz/SZ/E SOOZ/T/£ OOY�IId-2ISdO 'I' 'I S00z/T/E M8 ONO •ZOZZZSLO,dSOObS£AI6£I£ :aI OSSEO/TO/Zo as 8TOZ/TO/ZQ 4b'7171Z- Z0"6bT'L 6b-E9E'L- OZO'6bI'4- 0000'001 SOOz/I/E %OQO'S 60£IS90#'I00d VINNd ad .SOOZ/Sz/E 00WId-2ISdO soot/I/E Mal 9NO'I :ZOzzZSL03SOO89OXSSEi£ sOOZ/I/E :QI OSSEO/10/90 as 810z/IO/LO bL'S�I- £0'SS6'ZI LL'0o1'£I- OEO-SS6'ZI- 0000'001 SOoz/1/£ %000'S TZ99SSO#'I00d VWN,d ad f So0z/Sz/£ SOOZ/I/£ OOYQId-2ISdO soot/T/E D 'alONO'I •ZOZZZSLOESOOZSS?CSS£Ic :(II OSSEO/I ONO as 810z/10/90 EE'SOT- T6'O1WE bZ'6TL'£- OI6'019'E- OOOO'00[ SOoz/T/£ %000'S 9tSS99O#'I00d VNiN3 ad DIME[ aims aims Jud/saZu4S a;mg 23 aims awa pavadva aolidTsasaa adu sswi/u m :talq IURoUW 4903 aaTJd asmg awa ar;ag UW1 03TId Moll a;ma apm=J, . ._._ . ......... __.._... . ................. ............ __._... _...-.... _.-__. - aen :AaaaunC)aims lzo$a483 uopommusiy Aq pa:podag 6ova= sal podag ntB�aQ II01;0m mwl Wua OT140S 18MOV: zsuagXlojK :SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/I/£ 03wid-Had0 SOOZ/T/E MS'L ONO'I:ZOZZZSL03SOOZaHV Iot,I£ sI Osseo/I0/t o as 81OZ/I0/SO 8I'L£ LO'Z06% SZ'6£6`Z- 01.0'Z06't- 0000*001 S00Z/I/E %000'9 SZ£ZOLO#'IOOd VwNd ad sS00Z/SZ/£ SOOZ/I/£ OOIHId-2ISd0 Mal SOOZ/I/£ ONO'I :ZOZZZSL03SO06daVTOi�I£ sI OsS£0/i0/SO sa BIOZ/IO/SO t,S'I£- ZZ.'I SO'I 9L'Z80'I- OZZ'I SO'I- 0000*001 SQOZ/I/£ 0/0000'S OI ZZOLO#'i00d vFgN A ad :SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/I/£ 03L1lld-2Isd0 SOOZ/I/£ Mal DNiO'I :ZOZZZSLOdS00Z�d'I.Lo t I£ sI Osseo/IO/b0 as 8IOZ/IO/SO 7.Z'£- SZ'LOT 09'01I- OSZ'LOT- 0000*001 SOOZ/I/£ 0/6000'9 9Z0L690#'I00d VWNd ad ;S00Z/SZ/£ SQOZ/I/£ ooviid-2Isd0 SOOZ/I/£ MalONO'I 'ZOZZZSL03SOOEZOSOObI£ sI OSS£0/i0/SO as STOZ/IO/SO 06'8fl- 6I'£96'b 60'Z1I'S- 06I'£96't,- 0000'001 SOOZ/I/£ 9/6000'S 6889690#100d VWNd ad ;SOOZ/SZ/£ SOQZ/I/£ ZO OOI+{IId-HadO SOOZ/I/£ WNSJ'DNO'I • ZZZSLOAS000ASSOOti1£ sI OSS£0/I0/90 as 81 QZ/I O/SO 00'99- LS'661'Z LS'S9Z'Z- OLS'66I'Z- 0000*00I SOOZ/T/E 0/6000'S ZSSS690#'IOOd VYMd ad f SOOZ/SZ/£ SOQZ/i/£ OOY1iId-2IHd0 Z' SQOZ/I/£ YODWI'ZOZZZSL03SOMILmoftIE si OSS£0/IO/£0 as SIOZ/IO/£0 £0'6ZS S£'*,E9'Li 8£'E9I'8I- OSE'b£9'LI- 0000'001 SOOZ/I/£ %000'9 b£S£690#'IOOd V➢11N.d ad .SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/I/£ OOINId-2IHdO Sow/T/E MST ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdS008DL oft I£ si OSSEO/10/SO sa 810Z/IO/SO L617- £0'88E 00'£6E- 0£0'88E- 0000*001 SOOZ/I/E 0/6000'9 6986890#100d VWN.d ad •SOOZ/SZ/£ SOQZ/i/E OOINId-2Iad0 S00Z/i/£ MST ONO'I -ZOZZZSLO,dSO06'MrOOb I E sI Osseo/to/go sa SIOZ/IO/90 0831£I- t+*C6t,'V tZ'SL9't,- 0bb'£6VV- 0000'00I SOOZ/I/£ %OQO'S 6£LS890#100d VMA ad --- ------------- — aose Dose Dome ivd/oajvqS *;us ma Dome 'a;va pavodam -----uoiidpasaa� 8901/uTwo lax ;unou:V 4800 avlsd Dome 24$a OP499 UWL saisd iwo'i a48a opwa, zvm a��u8as - Soot/i E/S - SooZ/T/E 000m0000woo-azzvariu ocPasoo awn :a=moo mma 6sofa;8o uoF;assusss 6q papodag 6ovama :az:wodou ou;aQ uoPae UWs L S� �a aI37eS Ienl�'V; z{auagXJoIA .SOoz/Sz/£ 500Z/I/£ OOINId-2Isd0 So0z/I/£ Y1 HI'DNUI :ZOZZZSLOdSO0I SON IObIE :a[OSSEO/I0/Lo as 131Oz/10/LO 9b'L9- SO'S9z'S bs'zEE`s- O8O'S9z`s- 0000'0OI Sooz/1/£ 0/60O0'S 99££ILO#'IOOd VWN3 ad .sooz/sz/£ S OOY11Id-2ISd0 OOZ/[/E SOOZ/I/E YESIVNO'I :ZOZZZSLOSSOOtSdNIOb I :a1 OSS£0/I0/90 QQ S[oz/10/90 SS'b£- IL'ZSI`i 6Z'LSI`l- 0[L'ZSI`1- 0000"00I SOOZ/[/£ 0/6000'9 bb£EILO#'IOOd VWNd ad s00z/SZ/E 00YYId-Had0 S00z/i/E Y &IONCYI :ZOZZZSL03SO08O8XIObi£ s00z/I/£ :Q[OSSEO/to/go as S[Oz/to/go £9'1IE- S9'LS£bi SZ'669`01- OS9'LSE`0I- 0000'OOI S006/1/£ %QOO'S S£ZOILO#'IOOd VWNd ad f SOOz/sz/£ 50ot/I/£ OOY11Id-2Iad0 Soot/I/E YQ ZI0NI0'I :ZOZZZ5LOdSO00A"1Obi£ :at OSSEO/10/90 as SI Oz/10/90 ZO'I- 09'6L 69'O9- 009'6L- 0000'001 soot/I/E %OOO'S £9660L0#'IOOd VY01d ad .soot/Sz/£ SQQZ/T/£ OOINId2I- zd0 SOOZ/I/E Y� 31DNO'I -ZOZzzSLOdSO0i7rAPIOKC :aI OSSEO/10/90 as S[oz/10/90 LITE- ZI"68S`Z 6Z'Zz9`z- OZ['68S`Z- 0000"001 soot/l/E %000'S L[660LO#'I00d VWNd ad .Soot/az/£ OOYgld-HZJO S006/1/£ Mal SOOZ/[/£ :QI OSSEO/TO/90 as 81Oz/10/90 b8"51- z['9Ez`I 96'TSZ`I- QZI'9£z`I- 0000'001 Soot/I/£ %Q00'S 9Z860LO#'I00d VWNd ad +S00z/sZ/£ SOOz/L/£ OOY�Ild-2Iad0 SOOz/1/E Mal JNO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSO09SarlObl£ a1 OSSEO/l0/90 as Sioz/I0/LO 9S'E81- SL'9ZE`bl I£'0[5`b[ OSL"9Z07l 0000"001 SOOZ/1/£ %000'S 09£60LO#'I00d VWN3 ad ;SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/[/E I' YIIOOY1IId-2Idd0 s0oz/[/E MHONO'I •ZOZZZSL03SOOLZH1ObT£ aI OSS£0/l0/90 as SlOZ/10/90 0['Ob- 08'9££`I 06'9L£`1- 008'9££`1- 0000"001 soot/1/£ %QOO'S SV 160LO#'100d VWN3 ad 098$ assa alga =gd/saris awa za rise ava pavodam uondpOsaa addy 9807/upo lax 3UU0UW :1803 aalsd asus a;8a auras 9011d I=01I a;$a apwi. _......... zvxi�•��s SOOZ/T E/S - SOOZ/T/E 000010000830-QaLV(rrz0sm02-Gsao asa :A=""`o'er 6xoga48C) uoj;assusas ,&q papodag 6avee�a :�asoavg I1�aQ i[o�;assas�y 9b awa alas jumov uouaq-Vlom f soaZ/sZ/E SOOZ/I/£ OOINId-mado SOOZ/[/£ Ma'ONO'I•ZOZZZSLOdSO06dbSZObI£ :a1 Osseo/10/01 au 81 0Z/I0/01 L8'80I- ZZ'L6b'8 60'909'8- OZZ'L6b'8- 0000'00I SOOZ/I/e 0/0000'S 0£IL£LO#'I00d VFu" ad s SOOZ/sZ/e OOINId-2Iad0 S00Z/I/E Mal ONO'I:ZOZZZSLOdSOOSNdwzOble Sow/I/£ :(II Osseo/10/01 au 81OZ/10/11 8SL- 6b'16S LO'66S- 06b'I6S- 0000'0OI SOOZ/I/£ %QOO'S USZELO#'IOOd VINN3 ad ;SOOZ/SZ/£ Z/I/E OOIN[d-2IHd0 SOON WHZ'LDNO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSOOEA&MHZObI£ :aI OHS£0/IO/Lo as 81OZ/IO/LO 98'Zb- 8Z'sb£'£ bi'88e'e- 08Z'Sb£'E- 0000'001 9006/1/£ 0/6000'S 1096ZLO#'I00d VINNA ad •SOOZ/sZ/£ SoOZ/I/£ 03FUCI-Hado SOOZ/I/£ WH31ONO'I :ZOZZZSL03SOOSLVQZObi£ :QI OHSbO/I ONO QQ 6100/0/90 6E'EES- £L'L£Z'6£ ZI-ILL'6£- 0£L-L£Z'6£- 0000'OOI S006/I/£ 0/6000'S o£SSZLO#'IOOd VINNd ad sSooZ/SZ/E Sow/I/£ 0OINId-HScI0 SOQZ/T/£ YMH'I'ONO'I:ZOZZZSLQ.dSOObOXVZ;ObI£ :(It Osseo/IO/9O as SIOZ/I0/90 OZ'sSb- 8b'Z9b'ob 89'L16'Ob- OSb'Z9b'ob- 0000'OOI SOOZ/I/£ %000'S L8b£ZLO#'I00d VINNd ad a sOOZ/sZ/£ S006/I/£ OOINId-?Iado SOQZ/I/£ MalDNO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSOObAMIObi£ :a1 OSS£0/T 0/90 Qa 8 T OZ/10/LO 9E'II4'b OL'Zs8'b- o9£'IIL'b- 0000*001 SOOZ/I/E 5/6Q00"S 6Z91ZLO#'I00d VINN3 ad ;SOOZ/sZ/£ sow I/e OOWId-ZISdO SQQZ/[/£ m�"I DxcrI:ZOZZZSLOdSOOONNATObIc :al OaS£0/T O/9O as SI OZ/I0/90 b0'£68- EO'89L'6Z LO'199'0E- OEO'89L'6Z- 0000'OOT sOOZ/I/E %000'S 69£OZLO#'IOOd VINNd ad sSQOZ/SZ/£ s0oZ/T/£ 0OINId-Had0 S00Z/[/£ MSZDNO'I 'ZOZZZSL03SOMOMIObI£ :GI OSS£O/I O/LO as 8I OZ/I O/LO 09'65;Z- 69'I9Z'OZ 6Z'IZS'OZ- 069'19Z`OZ- 0000*001 SOOZ/I/£ 0/6000'S 6I£OZLO#'I00d VFgN3 ad 29B9 2"9 SIMg jud/sezir4S nun zz rise alga Pavodam uo1012098a add,L 8907/UM laid ;unoutV ;803 solid Dime alga awes UWL solid IN001 alga OPW L 900Z/ C/E - SOOZ/T/E 00001000oso0-affZvar708M00 afiW aen :s*Ua=o won 6soga;8C) uopommuz L Aq papodag 60YRAS :O :podgU [18;aa UOTIOMMBTZ L..... -_..._... .-- ......... . . ..-_.. . ........._....... . ........_.... . ..__...... . - ... Transaction Detail Report ID =DA09 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency- U13D 000BLCOABOLMATED-OCSO00010000 3/1/2005 - 3/31/2005 status:FINAL Trade Date Local Price Tran Settle Date Base Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date. Base Ea Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base PI) FNMA POOL#073821 1 5.000% 3/l/2005 100.0000 -2,275.470 -2,304.62 2,275.47 -29.15 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SECID: 3/l/2005 31402UDQ20CSF07522202: LONG TERM 3/l/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/25/2005 PD FNMA POOL#0738487 5.000% 3/l/2005 100.0000 -3,760.770 -3,808.95 3,760.77 -48.18 10/01/2018 DD 10/0 1/03SEC TD: 3/l/2005 31402UNC20CSF07522202: LONG TERM 3/l/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/25/2005- PD FNMA POOL#0740457 5.000% 3/l/2005 100.0000 -21,467.480 -21,759.30 21,467.48 -291.82 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC ID: 3/l/2005 31402WTN80CSF07522202: LONGTERM 3/l/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/25/2005- PD FNMA POOL#0740471 5.0000/a 3/1/2005 100.0000 -2,947.120 -2,984.88 2,947.12 -37.76 10/01/2018 DD 10/01/03SEC TD: 3/l/2005 31402WT400CSF07522202: LONG TERM 3/l/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/25/2005 PD FNMA POOL#0740748 5.000% 3/l/2005 100.0000 -9,436.040 -9,556.94 9,436.04 -120.90 10/01/2018 DD 11/01/03SEC11): 3/l/2005 31402W5H70CSF07522202: LONG TERM 3/l/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/25/2005- PD FNMA POOL#0743868 5.000% 3/l/2005 100.0000 -800.400 -810.65 800.40 -10.25 11/01/2018DD 10/0 1/03SEC ID: 3/l/2005 31403BMRIOCSF07522202: LONGTERM 3/1/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/25/2005- PD FNMA POOL#0744008 5.000% 3/l/2005 100.0000 -4,870.190 -4,932.59 4,870.19 -62.40 07/01/2018 DD 09/01/03SEC ID: 3/l/2005 31403BR540CSF07522202.-LONG TERM 3/l/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/25/2005- PD FNMA POOL#0744316 5.000% 3/l/2005 100.0000 -2,417.360 -2,448.33 2,417.36 -30.97 09/01/2018 DD 09/01/03SECID: 3/l/2005 31403B3Z40CSF07522202:LONGTERM 3/l/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/25/2005 Workbench 'Actual Settle Date 47 Sfi a7BQ aIAaB jumov. ipuaq-y10lA s SOOZ/SZ/E 00WId-2ISd0 SOOZ/i/£ WHHl ON01:ZOZZZSLOdSOO£ZVNEObI£ SQQZ/I/£ :QIOSSEO/IO/IT QQ SIOZ/to/II 99'L61- SO'S80'LI 09'ZSZ'LI- OSO'S80'LI- 0000'00I SO06/I/£ %OOO'S SZ47£SLO#'I00d VWN3 ad SQQZ/SZ/E 2I 00WId 2I�d0 SQOZ/I/£ WS.L'JNO'I :ZOZZZSLOSSOOMMI£OVI£ SOOZ/I/E :QIOaSEO/IO/II QQ 8IOZ/TO/ZI 90'QOZ- 9b'VI9'9I ZS'bI8'SI- 09b'bi9'SI- QOQO'OOI SOOZ/I/E 0/6000'S 096ISLO#'I00d VWN3 ad s S00Z/SZ/c SOOZ/T/£ OOWId-2INd0 S00Z/I/E MIHJ'ONQ'I :ZOZZZSL03SOOZaAU CObI£ :a OaSEO/I O/it QQ SI OZ/I0/T I 8I'6- SZ'9IL EV'SZL- OSZ"9IL- 0000'00I SOOZ/I/£ %OOO'S sf+OSLO#lood VWN,d ad ;SOQZ/SZ/£ SQQZ/[/£ OOWId-2I�d0 SOWoz/I/E Mal ONO I :ZOZZZSLOdSO09anf'£Ob I E :(It OSSEO/I0/I I QQ 8I00 I0/I T IS'I9Z- L9"EEbbZ OVS69'OZ- OL9'E£b`OZ- 0000*00I SQQZ/I/£ %000'9 09EOSLOV100d VWN3 ad :SOOZ/SZ/£ Z/[/£ �W�-2ISd0 SOO /E M8'I'VNO'I -ZOZZZSLO.dSO0ZVf1f`EObT E S006/I :QIOaS£0/TO/II au 8IOZ/TO/II 01?'LSb- S4'669`SE SI'LSI'9E- OSL'669'SE- 0000*001 SQQZ/I/E 0/6000'9 LLEQSLO#'IOOd VWNd ad .S00Z/SZ/£ SOOZ/I/£ 00WId-2I�d0 SOOZ/I/£ Mal ONO'I •ZOZZZSLOSS000'IL.OEOb IV :QI OSSEO/I0/I I QQ 8I OZ/TO/ZI IE'SS- S6'9IE'b 9Z'ZLE'b- OS6'9I£'b- 0000"001 SQQZ/I/£ %OOO'S 6688bLO#100d VWNd ad ,.S00Z/SZ/£ SOOZ/I/£ 0OWId-2ISd0 SOQZ/[/£ WHM lJNO'I•ZOZZZSLOdSO06HN`JEObI£ :GI O8SE0/I0/60 QQ 81 OZ/I0/80 99'0I- LS'I EB ZZ'Z178- OLS'I E8- 0000'00I SQQZ/I/E %OOO'S QOb8bLO#'IOOd VWNd ad f SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/I/£ 0OWId-2ISd0 SOOZ/I/£ Ma JNO'I 'ZOZZZSL03S000X£.3£ObTE :QIO8SE0/IO/II QQ SIOZ/TO/II SS'b£- LO'OZL'Z Z6'bSL'Z- OLO'OZL'Z- 0000'00I SOOZ/T/E %OOO'S 1716LbLO#'IOOd VWNd ad eves ages Dees AWsen 48 awn xs Dees aqua pavodam uoudpama eddy 98011/UTBD 49N ;unomd ;903 valid aims a;mQ ap;a$ umsy 0011d Mol a;ma aPWJI ...... -----. .. — - ..-- - - - 'Ima'swine 90O /T S/E - SOOZ/T/E 00001 0-awymosNo"soo aen :S=tea ams Ajo2a;BC) uollom mwj, dq paprodag GUVZ a ;W:p9duV I� aQ uo�;aesassy ........_.. ._..-_........_.....__ ... ...... .. ... _....... . . ...... .. .............. .__....... ....__... - 6ti OWa QMQS t{�taq.�lo� :SOOZ/SZ/E S00Z/I/£ ��-2ISd0 S00L/I/£ Mal ONO'I:ZOZZZSLO.dSOOssvHSObIE QI 321SWIO/ZI QQ 61OZ/I0/ZI 9I'Z8I'Z£ t,9'6I9'ZE- 09I'Z8I'Z£- 0000'001 SOOZ/I/£ 0/6000'S 8ObL6LO#'I00d WaNd ad s SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/I/£ OOI+�Id-2ISd0 Mal DNO'I�ZOZZZSL03SOOLUJ2iSObI£ SOOZ/I/£ :GI QQ 6IOZ/IO/ZI LS1,6I 9T'£I£'b1 £L'LOS'bI- 09I'£I£47I 0000'001 soot/I/£ %000'S 09IL6LO#'IOOd VWNd ad sS00Z/SZ/E SOOZ/I/£ OO]NId-2ISd0 SOOZ/I/£ YOS'L ONO'I:ZOZZZSLOASO06'DXNSOb T E :at aast o/T 0/T I as 6T OZ/TO/T T £S'Lt,- 01.'96b'£ £Z't+q'£- OOL'96b'£- 0000'00I Soot/I/£ 0/6000'S 96It,6LO#'IOOd VD1TrA ad SOOZ/SZ/E SOOZ/I/£ OOINId-2ISd0 SOOZ/I/£ Waal •ZOZZZSL03SO06IAT'I'ISOt,I£ :at msi7o TO/OI as 6IOZ/I0/OI £9'Stll- 94'EE6'0I 6£'Z80'II- 09L'££6'0I 0000'00I SOOZ/I/E %OQO'S Z£bZ640#100d VWN3 ad SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/T/E �� 2ISd0 S M3'I'ONO'I :ZOZZZSL03SOObdMSOt1IV 00Z/T/£ '.(It as61OZ/IO/ZI t?6'981- 60'ZSL'E[ £0'6£6'EI- 060'ZSL'£I- 0000,001 SOW I/E 0/6000'3 OL968LO#'I00d Mid ad :SOOZ/SZ/E SOOZ/I/£ OOY1TId-2ISd0 SOW I/£ MST ONO'I'ZOZZZSLOdSO09bHHS0t I£ al OSStbO/I0/11 Q(I 61 OZ/I0/11 II'6LI- 06'46I`EI I£'LLE'£I- 006'L61'£I- 0000*001 SOW I/E %000'3 TSZtl8L0#'I00d VwN.d ad sS00Z/SZ/£ 03INId-2ISd0 SOOZ/I/£ SOOZ/I/£ MST E)NO'I•ZOZZZSLOdSO082IT'SEOb I E QI OSSEO/I0/11 as 81 OZ/10/11 £I'6Z£- 6E'S9t7'SZ ZS'b6L'8Z- 06E'S9t,'8Z- 0000'001 SOW I/£ %000'S ZL£99LO#100d VwN,d ad :SOOZ/SZ/E SOOZ/I/£ OOIre[d-2ISd0 YMS'I'rJNO'I•ZOZZZSLOSSOOEV9aE0bI£ SOOZ/I/£ QI OaS£0/IO/I I Qa 8TOZ/IO/ZT Zt,'SL- 19'0ZT`9 £0'661'9- OT9'OZ['9- 0000'00I SOOZ/I/E 0/0000'9 S919SLO#1I00d VwNd ad emu asag emu and/samgS a4va us assg aqua powdem uapdpasaa adAL 06011/uPo Zem ;un0u1 :1900 **lad assu awa amen ussy aal=d rwol nua apssy -- ............. - ZVHIaI��i�s SOOZ/TE/£ ' SOOZ/T/E 000010000000-(19.9var7oslvoa-asoo Gen 'dvuazmmo me Szo$a;8C) uopommws L ,&q papodag 60YHAs3 :Qi asudvg 0$naQ UOPOWSUWJ, 09 UTUQ;PMOS lumjv; yvuagXjozd .SOOZ/SI/£ SOOZ/I/E OODY[d-2ISd0 SQOZ/T/£ MIST JMO'I �ZOZZZSLOSSOOLSM60Z9E :(If OSS86/I0/90 QQ SZOZ/S I/90 tT'ZT- ZT•ESZ 9Z'99Z- OZI'ESZ- 0000*00I SOOZ/I/£ %OOS'9 It09LtO#'IOOd VDQNTO ad a SOOZ/S I/£ SOQZ/I/£ OOINId-2ISd0 'I SOOZ/I/E YOS JNIO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSOOtWSO60Z9£ :Q[OSS86/10/LQ QQ SZOZ/SI/LO 06'OI- OT'OZZ 00'1EZ- 00I'OZZ- 0000'00I SOOZ/I/£ 0/0009'9 ZS089tO#lood VIATNID Qd .SOWS I/E SQOZ/I/E ��-�SdO SOOZ/I/E W1121 NIO'OI •ZOZZZSLOdSO09V.LH6OZ9£ QI 32IS86/10/90 QQ SZOZ/SI/90 Z£'Z- Z8'9t ti'6t- OZ8'9t- 0000'00I S00Z/I/£ %O0S'9 St899170#100d VWNIJ ad 3.SOWS;I/£ S00Z/T/E OOWId-SHdO SOOZ/T/£ MI JNIO'I 'ZOZZZSL03S000,uu8OZ9£ Q[OZS86/I0/10 QQ SZOZ/S I/10 960- 9E'61 Z£'OZ- 09£'6I- 0000.001 soot/I/E 0/6003'9 IS86t70#100d VWND (id s SOWS I/E SQOZ/I/E O3WId-2ISdO SOOZ/I/E �21'L ONIO'I •ZOZZZSLO.dSOO£ZOfl90Z9£ QT OSS96/TO/t0 au 9ZOZ/ST/t0 E£'L- 86'L7I IE'SSI- 086'Ltb1 0000'001 SOOZ/I/E %OOS'9 68EIZt0#100d VWNIJ Qd SOOZ/SZ/£ OOI�Iid 2Iad0 SOOZ/I/E WHHI OHO•I:ZOZZZS40dSO06AXa9OtT E SOOZ/T/E :QIOSSSO/IO/IO QQ OZOZ/IO/TO ET'£89- 6Z'£SZ`09 Zt'9£6'09- Q6Z'ESZ'OS- 0000'001 SOOZ/I/E 0/0000'S IILL080#100d V➢1IRId Qd :SOOZ/SZ/E SOOZ/I/E 03IHId-Had0 SOOZ/I/£ D42ISIONIO'I �ZOZZZSLOdSOOItQV90tIE QI OHStO/IO/ZI QQ 6TOZ/IO/ZI WV9I- IL'STO'ZT SO'6LI'ZI- OIL'SIO'ZI- 0000'001 S00Z/I/E 0/6000'S EZ6£OSO#'I00d VWNd ad :SOOZ/SZ/£ OOIHid-2ISd0 SOOZ/I/£ KHZI ONCYI :ZQZZZSLOdSOOZXE-dSOt T E SOOZ/T/£ :QIOaStO/TO/ZI QQ 61OZ/I0/ZI OL'SZE- S9'696'EZ SE'SSZ'tZ- 099'6S6'EZ- 0000*001 SOOZ/I/E %000'S t[t46LO#'IOOd VWNI.d Qd mms mme alms zvd/saisgS aqua za ages a l3a papodam uopdpasaa addZ -� ggoZ/tqgfl lam ;unomV 4803 amid ages a;BQ aplas uasy ' amid IB-Vo'I a;8a apBiZ __-._._ __ _ _.... IMMAT:�w�s SOOZ/We - SOOZ/T/E 00001OOODSOo-amER OSMarvs0o asn :A*ua=O me 6ioRa;ea uopassuw L Sq papodag 60VRM :Ca:PDdwff Ou;aa UORO mull, T 5 visa a07aS Isn�d+ ipuatplloAI +SOOZ/IZ/£ SOOZ/I/£ OOW id-2ISd0 SOOZ/I/E Mai ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOBZNOSZZ9E Ql OSS00/IO/SO QO OEOZ/OZ/SO II'96£ 08'100'6E 69'909`SE- 008'I00`6£- 0000'00I S00Z/T/£ JX'HVA XSOb080#'IOOd II VWNO ad +S00Z/IZ/£ SOOZ/I/£ OOWId-2ISd0 SOOZ/I/£ MS1 ONO'I:ZOZZZSL03SOOt�WNOSZZ9£ :QI 021S00/IO/t�0 QQ 0£OZ/OZ/t0 LL'6£ £I'88£'t, 9£'8b£'t- 0£I'SSE't,- 0000*001 SOOZ/I/£ JA EVA S6£0800#'I00d II VWNO Qd +SOW IZ/£ I/E OOWId-2ISd0 S00Z/ SOW I/E M31 ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSO00ZOOSZZ9£ :(II OSSL6110/90 au LZOZ/OZ/90 £8'OZZ- L61,60'0I OS'si£'OI- OL6't760'0I- 0000'OOI SOOZ/I/E %SLE'L W880080#'IOOd II VWNO Qd +SQOZ/IZ/£ SOOZ/[/E 00WId-ZISdO s00Z/I/£ MZI ONO'I •ZOZZZSLO,dS006ZVOSZZ9E :QI O'3596/TO/ZT QQ 9I'08- tV6£8't, 6£'6I6'17- ObZ'6E8't,- 0000'00I SOOZ/I/£9ZOZ/OZ/ZT JA'aVA EZ00800#'IOOd II VWNO ad +S00Z/S[/£ SOZ OOWId-2ISd0 O /T/£ S06/I/£ MSI ONO'I •ZOZZZSLOHSOOZ3'If'I IZ9£ :GI DSS66/IO/LO QQ 6ZOZ/SI/LO 69'099- 0£'ILL'£I 68'I£t,'t,I- 00£"ILL'£I- 0000'00I SOOZ/I/£ %OOS'9 9Z£t,10#1I00d VWNO Qd +SOOZ/SI/£ SOOZ/[/£ OOWId-2ISd0 SOOZ/I/£ WHEI ONO'i •ZOZZZSL03SO090t3OI I Z9£ :al OSS66/TO/II aa6ZOZ/9I/1I E9'0- VL'Zi LE'£I- OtbL'Zl- 0000'001 SOOZ/I/E %OOS'9 SEZZTSO#'IOOd VWNO Qd +SOOM;I/E s o�W[d-2ISdo oot/i/E SOOZ/T/£ MaL ONO'I •ZOZZZSL03S0093ES60Z9£ :QIOSS86/I0/0I QQ 8ZOZ/SI/OI 06'1- OL'6£ 09'Ib- OOL'6E- 0000'001 SOOZ/I/£ %00S'9 86208t O#'IOOd VWNO (id +S00Z/S l/E 00Wld-Had0 SOOZ/i/£ MSZONO'I :ZOZZZSL03S006JAa60Z9£ SOOZ/T/£ :QIOSS66/I0/TO QQ 6ZOZ/9I/10 £0'6- K,88I LZ'L61- 0bZ'88i- 0000'OOI S00Z/I/£ 0/00S'9 9Z98Lt70#'IOOd VWNO (Id agsg Ding DOVE[ zm/sangq num xg Dims ova Pavodom uapdpamQ oddy ggoz/ulSa;aH :jmtouW 4803 amid agog 04$a apla8 UWL valid Isvo'i visa vPWZ -- ...... - -- --- ---. ._ _.. z RIA:■wee SOOZ/T£/E - SOOZ/T/E OOOOT OOODSOo-ast4 am :zamauno ms 6zofa48C) uol;ommuz,L Aq popodon eovems :az u"Ou FIRM[ U01:109 83 L _.._..- ...-...... . ............ ......... -- Transaction Detail Report m: ZWRAW Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD 0C8D6C0M0Lt0422W-OC 0000 3/1/2005 - 3/31/2005 Statm;1"sA, ... ..... __..80000 ......._. _ ._ _..... ........ _..._... _ ---......... .. ---........ .....__.. ............-.......... _ _ _... ..... _ .__... _. Trade Date Local Price Trap Settle Date Base Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss TYPe Description Reported Date Base Ex Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base PD GNMA II POOL#0080965 VAR RT 3/l/2005 100.0000 -17,214.630 -17,203.87 17,214.63 10.76 07/20/2034 DD 07/01/04SECID: 3/1/2005 36225DCB8OCSF07522202: LONG TERM 3/l/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/21/2005* PD GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH VAR RT 3/16/2005 100.0000 -8,087.320 -8,087.32 8,087.32 0.00 02/16/2030SECID: 3/16/2005 3837H4NX9OCSF07522202: LONG TERM 3/16/2005 OPER-PIMCO PD RESIDENTIAL ASSET 03-RS11 AIIB VAR RT 3/25/2005 100.0000 -28,808.070 -28,808.07 28,808.07 0.00 12/25/2033 DD 12/30/03SECID: 3/25/2005 760985KS3OCSF07522202: LONGTERM 3/25/2005 OPER-PIMCO PD SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 1 6.340% 3/1/2005 100.0000 -211,581.430 -211,581.43 211,581.43 0.00 03/01/2021 SEC ID: 3/l/2005 83162CLJOOCSF07522202: LONG TERM 3/1/2005 OPER-PIMCO TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR -1,020,810.050 -1,032,130.66 1,020,810.05 -11,320.61 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES BASE: -1,020,810.050 -1,032,130.66 1,020,810.05 -11,320.61 TOTAL PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS BASE: -1,020,810.050 -1,032,130.66 1,020,810.05 -11,320.61 MATURITIES CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR MT BANK OF AMERICAN NA INSTL C/D 2.260% 3/9/2005 100.0000 -1,600,000.000 -1,600.000.00 1,600,000.00 0.00 03/09/2005 DD 11/16/04SEC ID: 3/9/2005 0605OGGS3OCSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 3/9/2005 PIMCO Workbench *Actual Settle Date 52 £S aquQ;opws Isniw s zpuagxl0/A SOOZ/£Z/£ OOINId HadO Qlflal'I:ZOT I ISL0dSOObZOV8Zt ft S00Z/£Z/£ ai oasto/EZ/i i as soot/£Z/£o 00'0 00'000'o0v'I 00'000`00b'T- 000'000'00VT 0000'00I S00Z/EZ/E %SE£'Z Q/O'IdSNIVSfIXNVHOHSH IN OOINid SOOZ/81/E Zad0 aLflol'I:ZOT I TSLO,dS000HQ68SEi£ SOOZ/8I/E QIOHssooZ/8i/Eo 00'0 EE'688'669'I £E'688'66S'i- 000'000'009'1- 0000'00I SOOZ/81/E JVWJMOOSIINSSdrJ,Lw LLVN'I daasa im S00Z/91/E OOINId SOOZ/SI/E mad0(imb I :ZOI i iSLOdsoovam6££LE GIOHSSOOZ/SI/EO 00'0 09'Zi7l'b96'9 OS'Zbi'696'S- 000'000'000'9- 0000'00I SOOZ/SI/£ LVIN OSIQ dH00 OM NZ HINOH WHSQH3 .LIN OOINId S00Z/t,Z/£ SOOZ/bZ/E 2ISd0(imb i :ZOT i ISLOdsOOCIQS8EEi£ TII oassooz/vz/co 00'0 T FT IL'666'£ I I'I IL'666'E- 000'000`000't,- 0000'00L SOOZ/i Z/£ LVW N OSIQ SNOO?IH NI HINOH' HH(Iad im OZ/9 T/E OOINid SO So /91/E -HHdocirioI'I zolIISLOdsooLoassEEiE QIOHSSOOZ/9i/£0 00'0 £E'E£b'666'L ££'EEb'666'L- 000'000'000'8- 0000'00i SOOZ/91/£ LLVW N OSIQ SNOO?IH NZ HINOH' H2C[ad IW SOOZ/6/£ OOINid 2IHd0 QIfIb I:ZOI T ISLOdSO09AOSSE£IE SOOZ/6/£ =QiOSSSOOZ/60/£0 00'0 L9'90,'Z86'Z L9'90,'Z86'Z- 000'O00'000'£- 0000'00I SOOZ/6/£ L,VW OSIQ SN00?IH NI HINOH' H3GSd im SOOZ/I?/E OOINid SOOZ/�/£ 2IHd0 Qiflorl zoo i ISLOdS00LODS8££I£ QIOSSSOoZ/b0/Eo 00'0 £E'ELI'966'I £E'£LT'966'I- 000-000'000'Z- 0000"00i SOOZ/v/E JVIN OSIQ SHOD XEI N'I HWOH'I H3G3d LW SOOZ/E/£ OOINid S00Z/£/£ HHdO Uln0I'I :ZOI I ISLO.dMOWDS8££IE QIOSsSOoZ/EO/£O 00'0 -176"fii9'66L'S b6'b19'66L'S- 000'000'008'S- 0000'00I S000£/E IV➢4 N OSIQ SN00 gS NI aWOH' HZ(ISA im alms Doug ages sea/BOARS alum xg aseg 'opa Papadon ucgldlsasaQ addy ssoZ/umo:19M ;unowV 3903 aaFid rims o4va Dom um:y aa�sd Isao'I D;mQ OPmis 7mal'wqv48 SOOZ/iE/£ - SOW i/E 0000i0000goo-aasv(rzosmoa-asoo 6iolajsC) uol;ossusz L Aq popodoH 60VUMH :CU uodvH IMOCK uoy4om m T f, ........_..... -- --- ---- Transaction Detail ]Report ID LWBAW Reported by Transaction Category Base CUMMWy. USD ocsa-MMOLrDATM-OCOGOOO10000 3/1/2005 - 3/31/2005 Status:FINAL Trade Date Local Price Tran Settle Date Base Price cost Amount Net Gain/Loss TYPe Description Reported Date Base Es Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base MT U S TREASURY BILL DUE 03/15/2005 DD 3/15/2005 100.0000 -2,000,000.000 -1,998,365.33 1,998,365.33 0.00 03/03/2005SECID: 3/15/2005 912795TJOOCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER- 3/15/2005 PIMCO MT WELLS FARGO BANK NA INSTL C/D 2.520% 3/18/2005 100.0000 -1,300,000.000 -1,300,000.00 1,300,000.00 0.00 03/18/2005 DD 02/18/05SECID: 3/18/2005 9497PIU800CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 3/18/2005 PIMCO TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S.DOLLAR -36,700,000.000 -36,639,736.54 36,639,736.54 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS BASE: -35,700,000.000 -36,639,736.54 36,639,736.54 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR MT GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN#TR 00526 VAR RT 3/15/2005 100.0000 -2,500,000.000 -2,502,460.00 2,500,000.00 -2,460.00 03/15/2005 DD 03/20/02SECID: 3/15/2005 36962GXX70CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 3/15/2005 PIMCO MT GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN#TR 00526 VAR RT 3/15/2005 100.0000 -6,000,000.000 -6,002,544.00 6,000,000.00 -2,544.00 03/15/2005 DD 03/20/02SECID: 3/15/2005 36962GXX70CSF07522202: LONG TERM 3/15/2005 OPER-PIMCO TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR -8,500,000.000 -8,505,004.00 8,500,000.00 -5,004.00 TOTAL FIRED INCOME SECURITIES BASE: -8,500,000.000 -8,505,004.00 8,500,000.00 -5,004.00 TOTAL MATURITIES BASE- -45,200,000.000 -45,144,740.54 45,139,736.54 -5,004.00 INTEREST Workbench *Actual Settle Date 54 ' Transaction Detail Report ID: EwsA09 Reported by Transaction Category Base cummr: USn 11 r A D.COMOZd KUM-ocs000010000 3/1/200E - 3/31/200S Statm:FINAL Trade Date Local Price -- Tran Settle Date Base Price Cost Amount Net Grain/Loss TYPe Description Reported Date Base ft Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base CASH&CASK EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR IT BANK OF AMERICAN NA INSTL C/D 2.260% 3/9/2005 1,600,000.000 11,350.22 11,350.22 0.00 03/09/2005 DD 11/16/04SEC ID: 3/9/2005 060SOGGS30CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 3/9/2005 PIMCO IT FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N MAT 3/3/2005 5,800,000.000 385.06 385.06 0.00 03/03/2005SECID: 3/3/2005 313385CP90CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 3/3/2005 PIMCO IT FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC MAT 3/5/2005 0.000 3,826.67 3,826.67 0.00 03/04/2005SECID: 3/5/2005 313385CQ70CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 3/5/2005 PIMCO IT FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC MAT 3/9/2005 3,000,000.000 17,593.33 17,593.33 0.00 03/09/2005SECID: 3/9/2005 313385CV60CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 3/9/2005 PIMCO IT FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N MAT 3/16/2005 8,000,000.000 566.67 566.67 0.00 03/16/2005SECID: 3/16/2005 313385DC70CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 3/16/2005 PIMCO IT FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N MAT 3/24/2005 4,000,000.000 288.89 288.89 0.00 03/24/2005SECID: 3/24/2005 313385DL70CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 3/24/2005 PIMCO IT FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DISC MAT 3/15/2005 6,000,000.000 35,857.50 35,857.50 0.00 03/15/2005SECID: 3/15/2005 313397DB40CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 3/15/2005 PIMCO Workbench *Actual Settle Date 55 99 aw(I areas IBnlaV, zpuaq3j-joAl s s00T./Z/£ SOOZ/Z/£ 00D1IId SoOZ/I/E -2ISdO(IMbI'I :ZOI I I SLOASOOD�ZS80966 00'0 80'69b'£ 80'69b`£ 000'0 SOOZ/Z/£ :QI OZSJMI)W HSVO UMSVHHJ,SfLdAgHa .LT .soOZ/Z/E soot/Z/£ 00D4[d_zladO SoOZ/I/£ yRIsJ,ONOZ :ZOZZZSLOdMOLtZS80966 00'0 98-66Z'Z 98'66Z`Z 000'0 SOOZ/Z/£ :(11 OZSJJ/ t)W HSVO MfISVHHJ,SfMAMIa Jd soOZ/I£/£ 00wid-2Iado SoOZ/[£/£ WHS'LONO'I 'ZOZZZSLOdSOOtPd000066 :(If OSSJS82INJXI JHDINSaAO 00'0 SI'SLI ST'SLT 000'0 SOOZ/IE/E ,do lam f'aV JAI Sad Mal GO Soot/I E/£ OOIRid SOOZ/[£/£ 2IadO canO l :ZO I I I SLOdSOObf d000066 :GI OBSJS3t 2U NI J.HD11\IHaAO 00*0 SL'SOZ,I- SL'SOZ,I- 000'0 SOOZ/I E/£ .dO la N PQV INI Sa3 D1I2IS1 JAOHS AND soot/8I/£ OOINid S00Z/8T/£ 2Iado amOn :ZOI I ISLO.dSO00SflIdL6t,6 :(If ossso/8I/Zo QQ SOWS /EO 00'0 0o'Sbs`Z 0o'SbS,Z 000'0o0`00£`T SOOZ/81/E %OZS'Z a/O'IJSNI VN XMVH O()HVd Slla f1 Jd SoOZ/sI/£ OOINId S00Z/S[/£ 2Isdo(I flai'I :ZOI I ISL03S000[J.S6LZ16 :al0sssooz/£o/Eo 00'0 L9'bE9`I L9'bE9'I 000'000,000,z SOOZ/S l/E as SOOZ/91/£0 afla TIIH AHnSVSH.L S fl Jd Soot/EZ/£ ODWId soot/£z/E -'dSdO ClInOI'I :ZOI I ISLOASOOvzDVSZi7ob :QI OSSbO/£Z/I T as SOOZ/EZ/£O 00'0 L9'968`01 L9'968'0I 000'000'OOb'I SOOZ/£Z/£ %s£E'Z a/O'IJSAII VSn?IAIVH OHSH Jd soOZ/8I/£ OOwId SOOZ/8[/£ 2ISdO(IM611 ZOI I ISLodS3OOHG68S£IE QIOassooZ/8I/Eo 00'0 L9'0I I L9,011 000,000.009'I SOOZ/81/E J VW MnOOSIa NSSV DJM'IJ.VN'IV21HaHA J.I ages asgg rigs =gd/saUR8 alum za alma alga pavodov ua pauouaa muL -- 9807/U1130;OK lunouw ls(YJ aalsd aseg alga oplas l�BsZ solid lm)cn alga OPWI __... --.... ........_.......... SOOZ/T£/£ - SOOZ/T/E 000m0000sao-aamarrosmo"wo aim :6ouasma a"a 6joNap3o uopommujy Aq papodag 6 VKM :ai�odog [TWOU UOROBSUMy _._...... . ...._.._._ _ _.._ _ -- --- .._.___......._.. Transaction Detail Report ID. EWBA09 Reported by Transaction Category sam Currency: USD OCSD-00X80 JMTED-OCS000010000 3/1/2005 - 3/31/2005 Status:FINAL, Trade Date Local Price Tran Settle Date Base Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss TY" Description Reported Date Base Ex Rate Shares/Par Base Base Base 1T BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCTSEC ID: 3/l/2005 0.000 0.01 0.01 0.00 9960870940CSF07511102: LIQUID OPER- 3/1/2005 PIMCO 3/1/2005 IT BSDT-LATE MONEY DEPOSIT ACCTSEC ID: 3/1/2005 0.000 0.01 0.01 0.00 9960870940CSF07522202: LONG TERM 3/1/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/1/2005 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S.DOLLAR 34,700,000.000 89,799.71 89,799.71 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS BASE: 34,700,000.000 89,799.71 89,799.71 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR IT CIT GROUP INC NEW SR NT VAR RT 3/22/2005 1,500,000.000 10,954.69 10,954.69 0.00 09/22/2006 DD 09/23/03SECID: 3/22/2005 12558 1 AFSOCSF07522202: LONG TERM 3/22/2005 OPER-PIMCO IT WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000-11150 7.500% 3/28/2005 854.740 5,840.39 5,840.39 0.00 12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99SECID: 3/1/2005 302998GE30CSF07522202:LONGTERM 3/28/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/28/2005- IT FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP MTN 4.000%3/22/2005 10,000,000.000 200,000.00 200,000.00 0.00 09/22/2009 DD 09/22/04SECID: 3/22/2005 3128X3WY50CSF07522202:LONG TERM 3/22/2005 OPER-PIMCO IT FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 A VAR RT 3/15/2005 17.279.750 2,494.23 2,494.23 0.00 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/97SECID: 2/l/2005 3133TCE950CSF07522202: LONGTERM 3/15/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/15/2005- Workbench *Actual Settle Date 57 88 M=ag5jQ I :SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/£ ��-2ISd0 SOOZ/I/E YIRISJ.ONO'I:ZOZZZSL03SO0MO'IILEIE :aIOSSEO/IO/80 as 91OZ/T0/60 00'0 69'OEZ 69'Q£Z OI£'LIL S00Z/SZ/£ 0/0000'9 998b5;ZO#'IOOd VDQN.d Jd sSOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/£ 0OINId-2ISd0 SOOZ/I/£ D1T aiDNO'I•ZOZZ6SLOSSO06ASXIL£I£ :(It OSSEO/IO/SO as SI OZ/I0/90 QO"O bL'LOS VL'LOS Oi£"OOS'I SOOZ/SZ/£ 0/0000'S 09Li7SZO#'IOOd VINN.d Jd ;SOOZ/SZ/£ O0WId-gSdO SOOZ/SZ/£ W112 .DN01I:ZOZZZSL03SOOLtANILEIE SOOZ/I/£ :(ItOSSEO/I0/IQ as 8TOZ/IO/ZO 00'0 SEWS S£'698 0bZ'9SS'Z SQQZ/SZ/E 0/6000'3 I£9bSZO#'IOOd VINN3 J.I f SOOZ/SZ/£ S00Z/SZ/£ OOINId-2ISd0 Sm/sU£ VRISJ,DNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSO0t7aAXIL£IE :al OSSZO/I ON as LIOZ/I0/T I 00"0 9b'Zb9'Z 9b'Zb9'Z OZ6'ZZZ'0I SOOZ/SZ/E 0/o000'S OIStbSZO#'IOOd VINN,d Jd SOOZ/S I/E 0OINId-2ISdO SQOZ/SI/£ W821DN0'I :ZOZZZSL0ASOOSAaW6S£T£ :GI OSS66/10/60 as 600Z/ST/60 00'0 OS'Z9S`69 OS'Z9S'69 000'000`001'Z SOOZ/SI/£ %SZ9'9 SSSa NSSV DJdN'I.LVN'IV2ISQS3 .LI .SOOZ/9I/E SOOZ/9I/£ 03INId-2ISd0 SOOZ/T/Z MIST'DNO'I •ZOZZZSLOSSOO£ZIIAS8t£I£ :al OSSL6/IO/ZI as SZOZ/IO/IO 00'0 L£"QOZ L£'OOZ 000"LSL'Z SOOZ/91/£ 0/0b8E'9 17909-SL#d OND OIN'IHd ,LI .SOW I Z/E SOOZ/T Z/£ OOINId-HadO SOOZ/I/T W8S'I'ON0'I•ZOZZZSL03S00S6SOJ.££I£ :(II OSSL6/I O/Z I as Z£OZ/SI/80 00'0 SS'0 99'0 O9S'0 SOOZ/TZ/£ 12I EVA V ES 2I3S OJA SSV'IOLL'IM OIN'IHd J.I •SOOZ/IZ/£ S00Z/I Z/£ O0INId-2I2d0 SOQZ/[/Z YQl3J,DNO'I •ZQZZZ9L0dSO0S6S0J EE I£ :GI OSSt6/IO/ZI as Z£oz/31/80 00'0 04'T 04'I OOL'[ SOOZ/I Z/£ .12I HVA V£S 2ISS DJM SSV'IOLL If l N OLN'IH 3 Jd amens MMH aims and/maMRS a;ug xa amms aqua powdom uof;dumaa adds $so7/UTBJ lag ;unou W 4903 amid aims awa awas UW.L 201M 19007 Diva 0ML zvxia: axe soot/T£/E - Soot/T/E o000T000CW0-Qd7sv(T,zosuo01a5W asn s=mma ams djo2o;8C) uopovsuvj,L dq popodog 6ovam :M:Podou 084aQ uoP;Dvmsj�L 62 a=eQ aTaaS Tomes f Wuaq-laoM :s00Z/SZ/E SOOZ/SZ/£ OOY1IId-2IadO Mal ONOI SOOZ/i/E :ZOZZZSLOdSOO8aZAt8E[£ :QIO3s00/IO/LO QQ SIOZ/I0/90 00'0 t£"££S te'e£s 08Z'ISL`Z SOOZ/SZ/£ 0/000'9 ISts£SO#ZOOd VwNd 11 :sOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/£ ��N�dO M&LflN0'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOOffiZ0£8£IE SOOZ/I/£ :QI DZS66/10/60 QQ tIOZ/10/60 00'0 96'68t 96'68t 0tt'88L SOOZ/sZ/£ 0/6000'9 6t960SO#'IOOd VWNd it �s00Z/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/£ OOYQId-2I3dO Mai aiONO'I �ZOZZZSL03SJOZLOOIBeI£ :QI OdS66/IO/ZO QQ tIOZ/I0/ZO 00'0 EO'LSI £0'L9I 081*106 SOOZ/sZ/e %000'9 Z8119St0#'IOOd VPW ILI s00Z/SZ/£ 00Y1IId-EsdO S00Z/sZ/E Y 21 VNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdS30ILVX9LEI£ SOW I/E :(It OSSEO/I0/60 QQ 810Z/10/60 00'0 b0'S90'9 t0'990'9 OSZ't£Z'91 SOOZ/sZ/E %000'S OEbLSEO#'IOOd VYHNd .Ll sS00Z/sZ/E S00Z/SZ/£ OOIRId-2I�dO SOOZ/I/E Mal •ZOZZZSLOdSOOBY�It1'9L£I£ :(it OSSEO/I O/to QQ 8I OZ/I0/IO 00'O 98'56 98'96 099'Ioil SOOZ/sZ/E 0/0000'9 SZELS£0#'IOOd VwNd ILI •SOOZ/SZ/£ 03md-2IadO SOOZ/SZ/E S00Z/I/£ Mal ONO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSOOOWUtL£I£ :QIOdS66/IO/60 QQ tIOZ/10/t0 00'0 EZ'i89 EZ'I89 0t6'88L'Z SOOZ/SZ/£ 0/000'9 086EZ£0#'I00d VWNd ILI :s00Z/sZ/£ OZ/SZ/£ OOYIIid-2iSdO SO S00/ i/E Mal ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOO9bdIILEI£ :QI Ods£0/I0/I I QQ 8IOZ/IO/ZI 00'0 Z9'£IE'£ Z9'£IB`£ OE6'6ZCZI s00Z/sZ/E %000'S L86tSZO#'I00d VWNd ,LI •SOOZ/sZ/E SOOZ/SZ/£ OOY�IId-2IddO SOOZ/I/e MalON0'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOIZS'IIL£I£ :(It OdsEO/I0/0I QQ 81 OZ/I0/I I 00'0 LE'tZZ`I LEA ZZI Ot8't£Z`t SOOZ/SZ/£ 0/n000'S £S6t260#100d VWNd ILI DUBS agog ages Zed/vang8 awn zI agog awa pavodva U01011393Q addy owl/uleo lax junouW ;S3 aim ages a4va auras ueZy 'I "lid lumn 94va ap81Z f 'ivsia SOOZ/iE/E - 900VT/E 000010000930-assvar70&g0"S30 asn :60ua=3 Owe d=ogal8C) uopassassy Aq papodag sovaeas qn wag i finea t=01;2s mmi 09 97OQ aI-1aS lBivaV x zpuagxloAd .SQOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/£ OOINId-Had0 SOOZ/T/£ YORLON0'I:ZOZZZSLOdSDOLH'OSQQbIE QI Osseo/INCO QQ 8IOZ/INCO 00'0 6S-649 69'6L9 OEZ'460`Z SOOZ/SZ/£ 0/0000'9 OOZS890#100d VYQNd ,LI :SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/E 0ORLd-2ISd0 SOOZ/T/£ PORL0N0'I �ZOZZZSLOdSOOTIMI0OfiT£ QI Osseo/IONO QQ 81OZ/10/90 00'0 E£'IbZ'T cc,Itz'I OZ6'999'£ SQOZ/SZ/£ %000'S 806t,890#'I00d VWNd .LI f SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/E ODWId-2ISd0 SOOZ/T/£ Y�I &L ONO'I•ZOZZZSLOdS00l1*,Ai 6ET E QI OSSEO/10/TO QQ 8IOZ/IO/ZO 00'0 WSZZ Si,'8ZZ OZ£'E68 SOOZ/SZ/£ %000'S b££I890#100d VYIINd 'LI f SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/E 03Y1IId-2I2d0 SQQZ/I/£ WHSIONO'I'ZOZZZSLO3SOOtS£AI6£I£ QI0SSE0/TO/ZO au BIOZ/TO/ZO 00'0 ZS-006'I ZS'0Q6'I OZO'6t I'L SOOZ/SZ/E %000-S 60£IS90#'IOOd VNtNA bI •SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/£ 03YUCI-2ISd0 SOOZ/T/E YMSIONO'I •ZQZZZSLQdSO089OXSS£IE =QI OSSEO/T0/90 QQ 8IOZ/IO/LO 00'0 EO'68t,'E £0'68t,'£ OEO'SS6'ZT SOOZ/SZ/E 0/0000'S IZ9SS80#'IOOd vrim ,LI ;SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/£ CrIMM-Had0 SOOZ/I/£ YQ %L JNO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSOOZSdMEI£ QI OSS£0/IO/SO QQ 8IOZ/TO/90 OQ'O 99-1101 9S'IIO'I 016'019'£ SQOZ/SZ/E %OOO'S SbSSSSO#'IOOd VNINd .LI :SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/E OOYQid-mzd0 S00Z/I/E MIS.L JNO'I•ZOZZZSLOdSO09AAt3CS8Ei£ (II OSS£O/IO/b0 au SIOZ/IO/SO QO.O LZ'9ZI LZ'9LT ObS'bEt' SOOZ/SZ/E %000'S ESbSSSO#'IOOd VWNd ,Li sSOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/£ 00wId-H&CIO SOOZ/I/£ mailJNO'I•ZQZZZSLOdSOOIASAAS8£I£ :QI aSS£0/I O/£0 QQ 8I OZ/1040 OOV 8t"SIZ'T 8t,'SIZ'I Ob6'b60`S SOOZ/SZ/E %000'S E9ES990#1I00d VYQAid 11 amens amms aims d/F RS sivI za mms w ma pavodag Qopdponva add. amid aims alma ORTOO tasoZ/almfl 40M 3uno�aid 3�'J UWy solid 11001I OlmQ VPWs zvxca��n�a SOOZ/TS/S - SOOZ/T/E 00001OOoDSOo-asZvarIOSMODaeM asn :A*uamo*we &o2a;sa uoj;aesuw L dq papodag WVff= M podoH u1naQ uoPosMMU 19 2w(I aTpaS pniw Wuag5f-joAj .SOOZ/SZ/£ 00INld-Had0 Som/SZ/£ MHI,ONO"I :ZOZZZSLOAS00Z.AUOObIE SOW I/E :at Osseo/IO/b00081OZ/Io/s0 00'0 E9'Z8 E9'Z8 OSZ'LO[ SOOZ/SZ/E %OOO'S 9ZOL690#'IOOd VD1INA .LI .SOoZ/sZ/£ 03YUd-Had0 SOOZ/SZ/£ Mal.pNO'I :ZOZZZSLOASJOEZOS00bIE SOW I/£ :Q[Osseo/[0/so QQ 8IOZ/IO/50 00'0 ZS'IZL'Z ZS'IZL'Z 06I'£96'tb SoOZ/sZ/£ °/a000'S 688S690#'I00d VWNd LL .s00Z/sZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/E OO1NId-2Iad0 'I SOOZ/[/£ MSd.ONO :ZOZZZSLOdS000AHSO0b[E :at OsSEo/I ONO QQ 8I OZ/I0/so 00'0 61'464 61'L6L 048'661'Z 50oZ/5Z/E 0/6000'S ZSSS690#100d VKNd 11 •soot/SZ/£ 0OINId-IIHd0 SOOZ/SZ/E y ZI VNO'I :ZOZZZSLodSOObLAdOotIE 9006/[/E :atOSSEo/IO/£0 Qa 8IOZ/IO/£0 00'0 LO"oibZ'Z LO'ObZ'Z oS£'bE9'LI SOOZ/SZ/E 0/6000'S bE8E690#100d VINNd Il f SOOZ/SZ/E 500Z/SZ/£ OOI+�IId-2iad0 SOOZ/I/E M31ON0'I :ZOZZZSLOdSO08rwxOObIE :at 32S£0/lo/SO as 8[OZ/[0/so 00'0 9z,"c 9Z'tbE OE0'88E Soot/sZ/£ %OOO'S 6586890#100cl V➢1iN9 bI as00Z/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/£ 00INId-2iSd0 SOOZ/f/£ Mal UNUI 'ZOZZZ9LOdSO06'ISf`OOt,IE :aI OsS£0/IO/90 as 8[OZ/IO/90 OVO LL-OOb LL'OOb Obb'E6tb'fi soOZ/sZ/£ 0/6000'S 6EL8890#100cl V➢HNd .LI �sooz/sz/E SOOZ/SZ/£ OOY1iid-2Iad0 SoOZ/I/£ MST ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOASO0LHd300bi E :at OSSEO/IO/£0(1(18 1 Oz/I o/co 00'0 ZE'9E0'[ ZE'9Eo'I o8['[tiE`S 500Z/96/£ %000'S 8I£9890#'IOOd VWN.d it SOOZ/SZ/£ 0OINId-2ISd0 soOZ/SZ/E ➢ SIONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOZZMSOObi£ S006/I/E :(It Osseo/Io/ZO Qa 8[OZ/IO/ZO 00*0 OE'S[I OE"SII o[8'Z6Z SOOZ/SZ/£ °/a000'S 9999890#'I00d VWN3 ill assg as8g Doug ied/gajuIB alva xg mmg a;sa Papodag uapolsasaa add,L i Bo'I/uTgJ:IvN ;nnoury 4903 aalza aseg a;Ba OP409 t Z aaPd P1001I a;BQ aPW,L ...... ............... ..._.._.._ .......... ........ ........ _ -. ...... .._......... ....... . . ...... .. . _.... _ ......._. .. ....... - ............. WMA=mina 900Z/i£/E - 90OZ/i/£ 0000i000vaoo-oasmrioavo"aao asn :Avuassna aQeg Axoga;8a uopowsusay Aq papodag 6ovema m podae u01:10ss uli, Z9 omcl op s wmw ti :SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOz/Sz/£ OOINId-2ISdO S00Z/i/E WHZL ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOSSOO8OR)I I Ob I E ul Osseo/I0/90 QQ 8Loz/10/90 00'0 88'8911; 88'891% OS9'Lse,ol SOOZ/sZ/E 0/0000'9 SEZOILO#'IOOd VwRd Il .Sooz/SZ/£ so0z/sz/£ oorHld-xlaao YN SOOZ/1/E HI 0N0'I•ZOZZZSLOdS000Awf Ob1£ QI OSS£0/10/90 au 810Z/10/90 00'0 tZ'bL bZ'tbL 009'6L SQOZ/SZ/£ 0/6000'S £9660LO#'100d VD1INd Il SOOZ/SZ/£ ODINId-HSdO SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/I/E ➢1RISIIDNO'I •ZOZZZSL03SO0VrAf[OtI£ ul Osseo/10/90 QQ 810Z/10/90 00'0 IL'9E8 IL'9E8 OZI'68S`z s00Z/SZ/E 0/6000'2 Ll660LO#'I00d VPWd bI �SOOZ/SZ/£ soot/sz/e ooiHla-x�ao soOZ/I/E LHSZ ONO'I 'ZOZZZSL0dsoo-bdSf TOb1£ QI 0SS£0/I ONO QQ 81 OZ/10/90 00'0 Z6'£Ob Z6'£Ofi OZI'9£Z`I SOOZ/SZ/£ %000'S 9Z860LO#'I00d V➢NNd 11 :SOOZ/sZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/£ ��M-2iSdO SOOZ/i/£ ➢�RIS.LONO'I �ZOZZZSL03SOO9SHf'IOb1£ QI OSSEO/I0/90 QQ SIOZ/10/LO 00'0 t£'T1£`Z b£'IIVz OSL'9zE`b1 SOOZ/Sz/E %OOO'S 09E60LO#'IOOd VWNA ,LI +s00z/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/£ O0Y1IId-2ISdO SOOZ/I/£ YY EL ONIO'I •ZOZZZSL03SOOLWZH I Ob I£ Gl Osseo/10/90 QQ 810z/10/90 00'0 Ob'bE0`I 0t'b£0'I 008'9££'I Sooz/Sz/E %000'S 8b l60LO#'I00d V➢1iN.d IL }s00z/Sz/E S00Z/SZ/£ OOINId-2ISdO Y SOOZ/1/£ HHION0'I :ZOZZZS;IOdsoozQFIVIObI£ QI OSSEO/I O/b0 QQ SIOZ/Io/SO 00'0 SUM, 91T6b OLO'Zo6`Z SOOz/Sz/E %OOO'S 8ZEZOLO#'I00d VNNd Il :SOOZ/SZ/£ OZ/SZ/£ OOI+IIId-2ISdO SO Soz/ I/£ D1ffiS.LONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdS0O6dQVIOb1E QI 021S£O/10/90 ca 81 oz/I O/SO 00'0 SL'Ob8 SL'Ob8 OZZ'ISO`I SOOZ/SZ/E %OOO'S OIZZOLO#'IOOd VLYNd Il aqua auea aims -- zvd/aawg8 am ma aeea aqua pavodua -- -- - IIopdPasaa addy 9801I/uao Tax gUUoUW 3803 "Ila asea aqua OP429 UWL aai;d P0011 aqua apusz __......... __--...... 'Ivxls :Nulqs 9ooZ/Te/E - SOOZ/i/E °oT0000soo aztvarionmooasoo asa :smumo mma 6joRap3a uopowmwj, dq pepodag wvam :Gi vadou I1949Q u01421$uML £9 ;aquQ aT31aS Waaq-yloAI sS00Z/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/£ OOY1IId-2INd0 SQOZ/I/£ D1 &L DNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOO£d UMObI£ QI ORS£01101LO QQ 8IOZ/IO/LO 00'0 08'OZS'I 08'OZS`I 08Z'Sb£`£ SOOZ/SZ/£ %000'S I096ZLO#'IOOd VWNd .L[ aS00Z/SZ/£ mWid-2I8d0 SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/I/£ IN aLDNO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSOOSLVQZOb I QI DZSbO/IONO QQ 61OZ/I0/90 00'0 9Z'£Q6'ZI 9Z'£06'ZI 0£L'L£Z`6£ SOOZ/SZ/£ 0/0000'S 0£SSZLO#'IOOd vwm LI fS00Z/SZ/£ 03INId-2IadQ S00Z/SZ/£ SQOZ/I/£ Mal ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSDObaXVZObI£ QI Oss£0/I0/90 QQ SI OZ/I0/90 00'0 SL'IS6 SL'IS6 08b'Z9bbb S00Z/SZ/£ 0/9000'S L86£ZLO#'I00d VWNd LI �SOOZ/SZ/£ OZ/SZ/£ OOY1IId-2Isd0 SO Soz/W£ ➢1HH1ONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdS'JOi7AVaIObI£ QI Dam/I0/9O QQ SI OZ/I01LO OOV tb0'Z£I'I b0'Z£I'I 09£'IIL'b SOOZ/SZ/£ 0/6000'9 6Z91ZLO#'IOOd V➢1iNd LI ;SOOZ/SZ/£ ODWId-2ISd0 SOOZ/SZ/£ NHayONO'I •ZOZZZ9LOdSO00NI'AAIObI£ SQOZ/I/£ QI OaS£0/I0/90 QQ 8IOZ/to/ 00'0 96'ZbI'8 96'ZbI'S 0£0'89L'6Z SOOZ/SZ/£ 0/6000'S 69£OZLO#'IOOd VPWA b[ sS00Z/SZ/£ OOINId-2iSd0 S00Z/SZ/£ S00Z/I/£ WHH'LDNO'I -ZOZZZSLOdSOOSbDAAIObT£ QI DaS£0/TO/LO QQ STOZ/IO/LO 00*0 88'L69'Z SS'L69'Z 069'I9Z'OZ SOOZ/SZ/£ %000'S 6I£OZLO#'I00d VWNd LI ,S00Z/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/£ OOIIQ id-2Iad0 SOOZ/I/£ D1 H1 ON0'I:ZOZZZSLOdSOOISDN I OV I£ :QI OSS£0/I O/LO QQ SI OZ/IO/LO GOV OZ'9ti6 OZ'9b6 080'S9Z'S S00Z/SZ/£ %000'S S9££ILO#'I00d VWNd LI .S00Z/SZ/£ OOYBid-HadO S00Z/SZ/£ MSS DNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSJOZSdNIObI£ SOOZ/I/£ :GI Dam/I0/90QQ8TOZ/I0/90 00"0 Z9'69 Z9'69 OIL'ZST'I S00Z/SZ/£ %OOO'S bb££ILO#'I00d VWNd .L[ - ---------- -- ------- --- -- ------ .._. --- --- -_.....--_---- __— - - ---- --- asBg aseg aseg isd/sw"s ;nun ma aseg 'ni3a pavodam uol;dliasaa addy 88011/ul8'D42K ;unouuV 1800 oalid ages alga aplas ueiy solid PK"n 038a spesy -..............._ . ............ __....... WRIA M";vig SOOZ/TE/E - SOW T/E 000010000930-Qffzvar70sxoo-as3o am :A*u'uu0 ams AxoMnua uojj*mmwj Aq papodag 6avems :Gj uadaa HIROG u01409susus b9 wva a133aS ienjov; �aQ�1�oM .SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/E OOWId-NadO SOOZ/I/E WHRL'JN(n:ZOZZZSLOdSO0Im1NEl£ObI£ :QI O2SEO/IO/01 QQ SI OZ/10/11 0O'0 SS'ZbI 88'Zb1 00t"008 SOOZ/SZ/E 0/0000'S 898EbL0#1100d VWNd 11 .SOOZ/SZ/E SOOZ/SZ/E OOINId-mad0 SOOZ/[/£ Neal DWI 'ZQZZZSLOdSJOLHSMZObI V :aI Oa8E0/IO/1I au 910Z/IO/OT 0O'0 8£'OS6`Z SE'OS6`Z Ob0'9Eb`6 SOOZ/SZ/£ %000'S SbLOt LQ#'IOOd VWNd ,LI .SQOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/£ OOWId-2IadO SQQZ/I/£ 10031'JNO'I 'ZOZZZSLOdSOOOb,LMZObI£ :(II 32SEO/10/01 ac 8IOZ/10/01 00'0 Ob'LbL`Z Ob'LbL`Z OZI'Lb6`Z SQOZ/SZ/E %O00'S ILtftLO#'IOOd VWNd 11 .SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/E 00WId-2IadO SQOZ/T/£ MIMI,ONOT •ZOZZZSLOdSOOBNJAZObI£ :Q[OSS£0/10/QI aaSIQZ/10/OT 00'0 OS'ZEE`8 OS'Z££`S 08b'L9b`iZ S00Z/SZ/E %000'S LStObLO#'IOOd VWNd 11 ..SOOZ/SZ/£ OOWId-2ISd0 SOOZ/SZ/E y08ZON0'I :ZOZZZSL03SOOZONf1ZObIE SOOZ/I/E :(IIOBS£0/10/OI as 8TOZ/I0/01 00'0 8Z'IIL 8Z'IIL OLL'09L`E SOOZ/SZ/£ %OOO'S L8b8£LO#'IOOd VWNd 11 .SOOZ/SZ/£ OOWId-2Iad0 SQOZ/SZ/£ WHZION0'I :ZOZZZSLOdSDozoc11ZObI£ SOOZ/i/£ :QIOSSEO/10/01 QQ 8IOZ/10/01 00'0 OE'b0O`Z 0E'b00`Z QLt'SLZ`Z SOOZ/SZ/£ %000'S IIZS£LO#'IOOd VWNd ,LI .SOOZ/SZ/£ OOWId-2I�d0 SOOZ/SZ/£ PRIM IJNO'I :ZOZZZSLOgSD06dtSZOt,IE SOOZ/1/£ :QIO3S£0/I0/0I QQ 8IOZ/10/01 00'0 08'91b`Z OS'9Ib`T. OZZ'L6t,`S SOOZ/SZ/£ %000'S OEILELO#'IOOd VWNd 11 .SOOZ/SZ/E SOOZ/SZ/£ OOWId-HadO SOOZ/i/E MELDNO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSOOSNdWZQbi£ :QI O88£O/10/01 QQ 8TOZ/I0/I I 00'0 1 I'9£I 11'9E1 06b'16S SOOZ/SZ/E %QQO'S ELSZ£LO#100d VWNd 11 OBBs - mms MME Jed/gazlfft8 alum za ages alga papodag uopdKosaa adjL 8807/uTeJ;am :IunouW Wo aaFid ages anva arues U=Z 0013d I9;►0'I awa opwi, SOOZ/TE/S - SOOZ/T/E 0000t0000s30-a=vmwsmo"am aen : �ages 6sofa;8a uox;aesuwj, Sq papodag 6ovama m uodag OS;aa U0140MMML 99 07sa amaS ienjaH, quagXlom SOOZ/SZ/E 00wid-HadO SOOZ/SZ/£ MS,I,owi:ZOZZZS odsooZaMf'£Obi£ SOOZ/I/£ :QIO3S£0/to/II QQ SIOZ/to/II 00'0 ZO'989 Z0'989 OSZ'911. SOOZ/SZ/E 0/0000'9 SbbOSLO#'IOOd VWNA ,LI .SOOZ/SZ/£ OOIHid-sadO S00Z/SZ/£ mz.L vN0'i :ZOZZZ9L03SOO9aII Toi7iE SOOZ/I/E :QIOaS£o/to/II as SIOZ/To/II 00'0 60'000'L 60'00o'L OL9'£Eb OZ SOOZ/SZ/£ 0/0000'S OSEOSLO#'IOOd vrim LI s$OOZ/SZ/£ 00wid-sado Soot/SZ/E yea,0Ncn :ZOZZZSLodSOOZdfiP£ObiE Som/I/£ :QI OzS£o/10/11 as SIOZ/i0/II 00'0 96'960'8 S6'960'8 OSL'669'S£ som/SZ/E %OOO'S LLEOSLO#'IOOd d➢HN3 .LI �som/Sz/E S00Z/SZ/£ OOY1TId-2I8dO SoOZ/I/£ Mal ON0'I :ZOZZZSLO,dS000'ILOEOVI£ :QI OdS£o/Io/II Qa SIOZ/i0/ZI OO'0 5;6'109'£ 96'I09'£ OS6'9IE'b SoOZ/SZ/E %OOO'S 6688bL0#'I00d VWNd :SOOZ/SZ/£ OOYgId_ssdo Soot/SZ/£ Mal DNO'I :ZOZZZSL03SOO6HN'J£ObT£ SoOZ/I/£ :at OSSEO/I0/60 as 8IOZ/To/80 00'0 II'S£L II'8£L OLS'IE8 SOOZ/SZ/£ 0/oO0o'S QObBbLO#'IOOd VWN,d bl „SoOZ/SZ/E soot/sZ/£ oOrRla-xzao ma'I' SoOZ/i/E DNo i zo ZZSL0asoo0X£3£o,ic :QIOaSEO/IO/ii aQ8TOZ/10/II 00'0 OS'ZZZ'I 08'ZZZ'I OLO'OZL'Z SoOZ/SZ/£ %QOO'S b16Li7LO#'I00d VWN3 it SoOZ/SZ/E Oovgld-2ISdo Soot/SZ/E MZIDNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSO017Z£H£Ot,I£ SOOZ/i/E :aIO2SEO/I0/60 as 8IOZ/I0/60 OO'0 6T'869 61'86S 09E'LIVZ SOOZ/SZ/£ 0/0000'S 91ct+LO#1I00d vwm ,LI .SOOZ/SZ/E SOOZ/SZ/£ OOInIid-2IHdO SoOZ/I/E MHIONO'I :ZOZZZSLO,dSO0t,3HECOtIE :QI OSSEO/I0/60 as 81 OZ/I O/LO 00'0 Z9'008'£ ZS'OOS'£ 06I'OL81, 9006/SZ/£ %000'9 SOOflbLO#'IOOd VWN,d it aqua *=a aqua i8d/gom q8 awn za *am awa pavodau uol;disasaQ add, SS01I/U8'D 49N ;unouW :1900 aalsd eggs 048a OP409 uwj, aaFsd [8301I a;ua opwi 900V I S/E - WWI/E 0000iooaflsoO-aZtv(rz70S TOO-asoO Goa :Amaumo*=s 6sofa48C) uopovsus �L dq pwpodag wvam :ax:p0dQm as uo ossas�y • 99 awu ar-paS Ten;av: Wuaq-y.iom .SOOZ/SZ/E SoOZ/SZ/£ OOINTd-Had0 SOOZ/T/£ Y0211 JNO'I:ZOZZZSL03SD06DXNSOt I£ =alO21St0/IO/I[ aa61OZ/10/II 0O'0 SL'I9L'£ SL'I9L`£ OOL'96t'£ SoOZ/SZ/£ 0/6000-S S6Tt6Lo#'I00d VINNA .It .SOOZ/SZ/E Soot/SZ/E OOINId-Had0 SOOZ/I/£ Mal JNO'I•ZOZZZSL03SO06➢Q'I'ISott£ =al OHM/10/01 as 61OZ/I0/01 00'0 tZ'IE9`£ tZ'I£9'E 094'££6'O1 S006/SZ/£ %Q00'S Z£tZ6LO#1I00d VINN3 Il ;SQOZ/SZ/£ SOQZ/SZ/£ OO➢Hld-Had0 SOOZ/[/£ WHH'L ONO'I :ZOZZZSL0ASOOtdfHSObI£ :GI OSSWIO/Z[ as 61OZ/TO/ZI 00'0 Z8'9ZL'£ ZS'9ZL`£ 060'ZSL`£I SOOZ/SZ/E %000'S OL96840#'IOOd VINNd .LI f SOOZ/SZ/E SOOZ/SZ/£ ODW[d-Hzd0 IN SOOZ/I/E NS'I DNO'I 'ZOZZZSL03SO09tHHSOtI£ aI OaSt0/I0/I I as 61 OZ/I o/[I 00'0 LL'££0'£T 1,L'££0'ET Q06'L6['£[ SOOZ/SZ/£ %OQO'S ISZtSLO#'IOOd VWNd Il s S00Z/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/£ O3WId-ZIadO soot/I/£ WHZI IJNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOSUS£otI£ at 33S£O/to/I I as StON to/II 00'0 4I3,04`£ LT'tOL`£ 06E'S9b`SZ SOOZ/SZ/£ %OOO'S ZL£9SLO#'IOOd VINNd .LI .SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/E 03INId-2Iad0 SQOZ/I/£ YRISI`JNO'I'ZOZZZSLOdSJO£V9a£Ob T£ aI Oss£0/I o/T I as S I OZ/T O/Z I 00'0 9L'IS£'Z 94't8£'Z ot9'OZ['9 SOOZ/SZ/£ %000'S S915;SLO#'IOOd VINN.d Il SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/£ OOINld-2IadO SOOZ/[/£ WN3 JNO'I'ZOZZZSLOdSOO£ZVN£OtIE atOSS£0/to/II as 81OZ/to/TI 00'0 to'£EZ`£ IO'E£Z'£ O90'S80'L[ SOOZ/SZ/£ %000'S SZt£SLO#'IOOd VINNd ,II •SOOZ/SZ/£ SOOZ/SZ/£ 03WId-ZISdO S00Z/I/£ B1RSIIDNO'I:ZOZZZSL03SOOTHIN'I£Obi£ alOBs£o/Io/II aaBloZ/TQ/Zl 00'0 681790`£ 681,90'E 09t'tI9'SI SQOZ/SZ/£ %Q0o'S 0961SL0#'I00d VINN.d ill aims aims awe jd/saj13q8 awn zz ales a;8a PaPodaX aopdKosaa edAj, 880'1/uTm"J4eg :IunoiuV :1800 valid ales a;ma aglas um:y DOTJJ I*011 a;ma aPei.L ......_ ._ ...... - .... ...... ........ ........_. __ _ _ _....... ........ . ........ 'lwxi�: ems SOOZ/i M - SOOZ/i/E °o°oi000Qeao-a�v�arrosxo�asOo astt :Aouwmo ems 6iofa;8a uopomsmsiy Aq papodag 6aveesa :m adan OWae UOPONSus-Iy L9 aisa aTP7 S TUMW �a4�laoM •SOOZ/SI/£ SOOZ/S i/£ OOiNia-2I�d0 Mal DN0'I:zOZZZSLOASO09VJXI60Z9E SQOz/l/£ :aI OaS86/l0/90 as SZOZ/SI/90 00'0 89'9LI 89'9LI OZ8'9b SOOZ/sl/£ %OOS'9 Sb899b0#'IOOd VWND bi •SOWS I/£ 500z/51/£ OOIN[d-2Iad0 SOOZ/i/£ WHS"L ON°'I •ZOZZZSL0dsDoVUddsoz9E :aI OaS86/i 0/10 as SZOZ/SI/10 00'0 SE'99 SE'S9 09£'61 sooz/Sl/E %QOS'9 IS861470#100d VWND ,LI •SOWS l/E OOWId-2isdO sooz/SI/8 MH.L DNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOEZDn9OZ9£ SQOZ/I/£ :a1 OS896/To/b0 as 9zOz/SI/too 00'0 0Z'8t, 0z'8b 086'Lbl SOWST/E %OOS'9 68EIZb0#'IOOd VNTN'D .LI •sooz/sz/£ soot/sz/E oOwlazl- aao so0z/I/E B1 H1DNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSO06AXZ90bl£ :al oasso/I o/I o as ozoz/I o/I o 0O'0 6T'S£6`Z1 6I'8£6`ZI 06Z'£SZ`O9 So0z/SZ/£ 0/0000'S TTLLO80#100d VNTNd •sooz/sz/£ SOOZ/SZ/E OOINId-2iad0 D1RI SOOZ/T/£ S,LONO'I •ZOZZZSL0dMOIt,a b V90IE :aI3SSt,0/I0/ZL aa6I0Z/l0/Zl 00'0 LVI£S`ZI LVIES`ZI OIL'SIO`ZT SOQZ/sz/E 0/6000'S EZ6E080#'I00d VWNd ,LI •SOOz/sz/£ SQOz/SZ/£ OOINId-2Isd0 S00Z/I/£ Mal ONO'I :ZOZZZSLO.dMOZ b XE-dSOl£ :aI OaSt O/I O/Z I as 6I0Z/I O/Z l 00'0 £S'££8`£ £S'££8`£ OS9'6136`£Z Soot/Sz/£ 0/6000'S bTbL6Lo#'I00d WNd ,LI •SOOz/sz/£ s O°��-��O ooz/sz/£ SoOZ/I/£ WH31ON°'I :ZOZZZSLOAS-JO31"SOt71£ :aI OSStO/I O/Z I as 6IOZ/I O/Z I 00'0 S9'Z8�`E S9'Z86`£ 09T'z8l`zE sooz/SZ/E 0/6000'S SOtL6LO#'IOOd VWNd ,LI •sooz/sz/£ sooz/sz/E O°��-��O MSJ,DNO'I :ZozzzsL03SOOL21HS;Obl£ sooz/I/E :(IIOSSVO/TO/zl as 6IOz/I0/Zi 00'0 SE'Z8I`£T se z8l`EI 09I'£I£`bl sooz/sZ/£ "/o000'S 09IL6LO#'I00d VWNd .LI a�8g assu emu isd/sa=Rg a;sg xa aseg a;sa papodum uoyIdpasea ad6y MW7/UM lam :IartouirV :18cya valid aseg 0413a aP;ag usiZ aai=d Pawl a38a OPB=Z ........... _...__._ ............I. . .._ ....... _..... _-...... ........_. SOOZ/T E/e - SOOZ/T/E OOODT0000BOo-omvonosKocrasoo AxoRa;8C) uopossussy 6q papodag 6oveess ��uoavg O�ae uo��assassy _ . ............... • 99 QTUQ KpaS TunlzyV f tjjuagXloM f SOOZ/IZ/£ S00Z/I Z/£ OOYpId-2ISdO SQQZ/[/£ WHSI JNO'I:ZOZZZSLOdS0O0ZOOSZZ9E :QI OSSL6/10/90 QQ LZOZ/OZ/90 00'0 19'SbS IS'SbS OL6't,60`01 SOOZ/TZ/E %SLE'L WSSO080#'IOOd I1 VWN'D Il •S00Z/IZ/£ SOOZ/I Z/E OOYQId-HadO SQOZ/I/E WH%L JNO'I•ZOZZZSLOdSOO6ZVOSZZ9E :QIOSS96/10/ZI QQ 00'0 98'0£S WOES otZ'6E8,b SOOZ/IZ/E9ZOZ/OZ/ZI JX HVA EZ0080O#'IOOd II HIRND ,LI •S00Z/SI/E SOOZ/S T/£ OOIAITd-2ISdO WWSJ, SOOZ/I/£ JNO'I•ZOZZZSLOdSOOZd'IPI I Z9£ :QI 0SS66/IO/LO QQ 6ZOZ/9I ILO 00'0 OI'86t, 0T'86b OOE'TLL'£I SOOZ/SI/£ %QOS'9 9ZEbT80#'IOOd MAIN' bl •SOOZ/S I/E OOYITId-2TSdO S00Z/ST/£ YMBI JNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdS0090901IZ9£ SOOZ/I/E :QIOSS66/I0/II QQ 6ZOZ/SI/II 00'0 Z£'Stl ZE'St, OtL'ZI SOOZ/SI/E %OOS'9 SEZZISQ#'IOOd VYYNO 11 f SOOZ/ST/E SOOZ/ST/E OOINId-2ISdO SOOZ/T/E YIR 31 DNO'I •ZOZZZSLOdSOO9d£S60Z9£ :Ql OSS86/TO/QT as SZOz/SI/OI 00'0 WSST tIt"SSI OOL'6£ SOOZ/91/E 0/6OO9'9 86208t,0#1OOd VWNID •LT •Soot/SI/£ SOQZ/S[/£ OOYIiId-2TSdO Soz/ST/E YOM tJNO'I :ZOZZZSLOdS0O6IAO6OZ9E :al OSS66/10/I O QQ 6ZOZ/S I/10 00'0 8£'I S9 8£'199 01WO81 SOOZ/S T/E %QOS'9 9Z98LVO#'IOOd VWN O .LI •S00Z/S1/E Z/S T/£ O0Y1T[d-2ISdO SOO SOVI/£ WHS.L DNO'I•ZOZZZSLOdSOOLSZYH OM :Ql OSS86/10/90 QQ SZOZ/SI/90 00'0 18'ObL 18'O-�L OZl'£SZ SOOZ/ST/E %QOS'9 It,09Lt0#'IOOd VWNV 11 •SOQz/SI/£ SOOZ/S T/£ OOY4Id-2ISdO SOOZ/I/E YMZ.L DNO'I 'ZOZZZSLOd9OOi7WSO6OZ9E :al 3SS86/I O/LO QQ SZOZ/SI/LO QOV 9Z'865; 9Z'86S OOI'OZZ SOOZ/SI/E %OOS'9 ZS089t O#'IOOd VYHNO bl MMS ages ages id/gaUIS 9193 Zd DIMS a;gQ papoda2i -------- -- uopdjumea addy 8901I/u uo Tax ;unou[V 4903 solid ages alga ap;aS IIiuy aolsd IMo'I ansa apwL SOOZ/iE/E - SQOZ/i/8 000010000030-aaavamemoo-asoo aaa :A*Uauno mme dxoNa;8a uopassasi,L Aq papodag wvams m podom p$;aQ u0pammuzL 69 a7ea auras ien7aV f q=a4X1Dni Sooz/sZ/£ OOINId-Had0 SOOz/SZ/£ IN HIONO'I •ZOZZZSLO.dSO0E8XS8609L al ozsco/0£/zI as EEOZ/SZ/zi OOV Oo'8z£'I 00'86E'I OL0'808'8Z SOOz/SZ/E INHVAHIIV IISH-EOJASSV'IVLLNHaISs2I J[ S00z/9 T/E OOINld-2Iad0 Sooz/9I/E Mal ONO'I 'ZOzzZSLOdSO06XNi7HL£8E aiossocoz/9[/ZO 00'0 9z'I IZ'T 9Z'I I Z'I ozE'L80'8 Sooz/9I/£ IN EVA H3 6-OOOZ HI OWIa2I a,LO VWNIO .LI Soot/I/£ oomid-2I8d0 S00Z/I/E MSIONO'I=ZOZZZSL03SO0£Zf`3TVT8£ aIO2ISSO/I0/ZO as Sooz/I0/80 00'0 "'69I'L t t,'6SI'L 000'000`00S`£ S00Z/I/£ JA 2IVA 9IZ00 HL#NJ.IN SHOVS NVINa'IOO ,LI Sooz/SI/E OOIN[d SOOZ/SI/E HSdO airiOn :ZOI I ISL03SOOLXXJZ969£ al OSSzo/Oz/£0 as SOOz/ST/Eo 00'0 SL'Et�E'91 SL'Et�E'91 000'000b0S`z SOOz/SI/£J,2i NvA 9Zs00 NL#Njw dVO oai2[ IV2aaNav J I SOOZ/S I/£ OOINId-Halo Soot/SI/E MZIONO'I :ZOZZZSLOdSOOLXX`JZ969£ :(If OSSZo/oz/EO as sooz/SI/Eo 00'0 00'SZZ'6E 00'SZZ'6£ 0oo'000`0o0`9 SOWS I/£IN UVA 9ZS00 NJ,#NJJN dVO O3'IS WHaN30 Jd :Sooz/Iz/E s00z/I Z/E OOINId-2Iad0 Sooz/I/£ MST ONO'I:ZOzzzsLoasO08HOaSZz9£ aI OSst o/T O/LO as t coz/oZ/LO 00"0 49'tL8'E L9'ti48'E 0£9'ti[z`LI Sooz/IZ/E JA NVA 9960800# IOOd II VINNO ILL •Sooz/IZ/E S OOIN[d-2I�d0 OOZ/[Z/E Sooz/I/E MST ONO'i:ZOZZZSLOdSO08ZNOSZZ9£ ai ozsoo/IO/so as o£oz/oz/so 00'0 9T'Lz£'t, 9I"LzE'b 008'I00'6E Sooz/I z/E JX EVA X8ob08O#'IOOd if VWNO Il .Sooz/IZ/E SOOZ/I z/£ OOINId-2IHd0 WOO T/£ MST ONO'I :ZOZZZSL03SJO17WNOSZZ9E al Oas00/I O/t o as OEOZ/oz/t o 00'0 b£'SLV WSLt► 0£1'8807 SOONTZ/E J.21 2IVA S6E0800#'I00d II VINNO ill agog o"a own ZVd/80313t8 a4va xg mms -;nua pa:podam Qopdposaa adil 8801I/ulno Tag ;unouiry 4900 aaf=d agug a;sa oplas UUJL i ao�sd Isao'I a�oa apes.L Irvmu:ogoas SOOZ/T E/£ - SOOZ/i/£ 0000i 0000soo-ouvatzoemo rasoo asa Aoua mo"us 6io2a;8c) uol;ossuwj, .gq papodag eovam :W 3iodva OB;aQ u0E;0Bsuoil .-----...........__._ Transaction Detail Report Dk, ZWBA09 Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency. USD OC8D-CON8OLfJMTSD-OCSOOD010000 3/1/2005 - 3/31/2005 Status: FINAL Trade Date Local Price Tsan Settle Date Base Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Es Rate Stases/Pas Base Base Base IT SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 1 6.340% 3/1/2005 211,581.430 99,546.39 99,546.39 0.00 03/01/2021SECID: 3/l/2005 83162CLJOOCSF07522202: LONG TERM 3/1/2005 OPER-PIMCO CD US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.375%3/31/2005 0.000 31,920.00 31,920.00 0.00 01/15/2007 DD 01/15/97SEC ID: 9128272M3OCSF07522202: LONG TERM 3/31/2005 OPER-PIMCO CD US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.625%3/31/2005 0.000 6,720.00 6,720.00 0.00 O1/15/2008 DD 01/15/98SEC 1D: 9128273T70CSF07522202:LONGTERM 3/31/2005 OPER-PIMCO CD US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.875%3/31/2005 0.000 28,730.00 28,730.00 0.00 01/15/2009 DD 01/15/99SEC ID: 9128274Y5OCSF07522202: LONG TERM 3/31/2005 OPER-PIMCO IT VIRGINIA ELEC&PWR O1 SER A 5.750% 3/31/2005 1,750,000.000 50,312.50 50,312.50 0.00 03/31/2006 DD 03/27/01SECID: 3/30/2005 927804ENOOCSF07522202: LONGTERM 3/31/2005 OPER-PIMCO 3/31/2005- TOTAL FIRED INCOME SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR 28,377,003.390 781,967.57 791,967.57 0.00 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES BASE: 28,377,003.390 781,967.57 781,967.57 0.00 TOTAL INTEREST BASE: 63,077,003.390 871,767.29 871,767.28 0.00 TOTAL TRANSACTIONS: 43,324,515.480 -49,105,047.97 -9,417,100.27 -554,964.94 Workbench Actual Settle Date 70 ' _...._........-........ Transaction Detail Report M. ZWBA r Reported by Transaction Category saes canreaey: USD OCSD-CORSOUDATED-OCSO00010000 3/1/2005 - 3/31/2005 states;FINAL Trade Date Local Price Tran Settle Date Base Price Cost Amount Net(lain/Loss TYPe Description Reported Date Base Ex Rate Shares/Pat Base Base Base Workbench *Actual Settle Date 71 FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 04/13/05 04/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR05-25 14 C Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Carol Beekman, Director of Communications and Administrative Services Originator: Juanita Skillman, CRM, Records Management Specialist SUBJECT: Update of the District Records Management Policy and Procedures, including the District Records Retention Schedule. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 05-08. adopting Policies and Procedures for the District's Records Management Program, Records Retention Schedule, Destruction of Obsolete Records, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 04-07 SUMMARY The District's Records Management Program, adopted as OCSD 04-07 has been updated to meet new statutory regulations and better serve the operational needs of the District. Additions are shown in Blue and changes in Red. Exhibit A is the Policy and Procedures for the Records Management Program (updated and converted to OCSD Standard format by Human Resources), Exhibit B shows the changes in the Records Retention Schedule, and Exhibit C the Record Series Definitions PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS: The Records Management Program was originally approved by the Board in October, 2000 as OCSD 00-26. It is updated annually, the last update being OCSD 04-07 in March 2004. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item:) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. X Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The District's Records Management Program is a dynamic Program, which documents how long to keep various types of information, as dictated by the legal, fiscal, audit or operational needs of the District. As a public agency we have an obligation to effectively manage and maintain the District's information, most of which is classified as public information. The attachments this year reflect changes made in response to the guidelines issued by the California Secretary of State (AB 474 amending Government Code Sections 60200 et seq.) as well as operational needs from various departments. These changes have been reviewed with and approved by General Counsel's office. H\dept\agenda\BOARDA-1\2005BO-1\D405\Item 14(c)Records Management doc Revised 8/10/98 Page 1 ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. OCSD 05-08 Exhibit "A" — Records Management Policy and Procedures Exhibit "B" — Appendix A - Records Retention Schedule Exhibit "C" — Appendix B — Record Series Definitions. H\dept\agenda\BOARDA-1\2005BO-1\0405\Item 14(c)Records Management doc Revised 8110/98 Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 05-08 ADOPTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR DISTRICT'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, RECORDS RETENTION, AND DESTRUCTION OF OBSOLETE RECORDS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ADOPTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR DISTRICT'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, RECORDS RETENTION, AND DESTRUCTION OF OBSOLETE RECORDS, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 04-07 WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish a policy to maintain a Records Management Program ("Program") that provides for the identification, access, and protection of all records generated or received by the District; and WHEREAS, said Program ensures that all District records are created, received, maintained, and destroyed in a cost-effective manner, in accordance with operating requirements for District business and applicable statutes and regulations; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of District is authorized, by the provisions of California Government Code Sections 60200 through 60204, inclusive to destroy records under certain conditions; and WHEREAS, it is desirable and appropriate to authorize the destruction of records on a routine basis that have been retained for a certain period of time, that are copies of originals on file with the District, or that have been preserved in conformance with all applicable statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1: Adoption of Policy and Establishment of Program as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: Adoption of Records Retention Schedule. The Board of Directors of District hereby adopts changes to the Records Retention Schedule, set forth in Exhibits "B" and "C", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. r Section 3: Authorization for Destruction of Records. The destruction of certain records, papers, and documents is hereby authorized, pursuant to California Government Code Sections 60200 et seq., after such records have been retained for the minimum time set forth on the Records Retention Schedule. Section 4: Destruction of Records After Preservation. Any record not expressly required by law to be filed and preserved, may be destroyed at any time after it is preserved in conformance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 60203. Section 5: Destruction of Duplicates. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 60200, any duplicate record, paper, or document, the original or a permanent photographic copy of which is in the files of any office or Department of the District, may be destroyed after confirmation with Records Management that such original or permanent photographic copy remains on file in the District. Section 6: Retention of Records Not Mentioned. All records, papers, and documents not mentioned in this Resolution shall be retained indefinitely. Section 7: Resolution No. OCSD 04-07 is hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 27,2005 Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Table of Contents Exhibit A Page 1 of 1 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date Issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 2 Revised: 04/27/05 Subject: Table of Contents Section Title 1.0 Records Management Policy 2.0 Introduction 3.0 Staffing and Responsibilities 4.0 Records Retention 5.0 Records Disposition 6.0 Vital Records Program 7.0 Historical Records Program 8.0 Records Management Program Audit Appendix A Records Retention Schedule Appendix B Record Series with Definitions ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 1.0 Page 1 of 2 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date Issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 2 Revised: 04/27/2005 Subject: Records Management Program Policy 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is the policy of the Orange County Sanitation District (the District) to maintain a records and information management program that provides for the identification, access and protection of all records generated or received by the District in the conduct of District business. 2.0 PURPOSE 2.1 The purpose of the Records Management Program Policy is to establish a Records Management Program (the Program) that will develop a systematic method for managing District records. The Program ensures that all District records are created, received, maintained and dispositioned in a cost-effective manner, in accordance with operating requirements for District business and applicable statutes and regulations. 3.0 PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITY 3.1 Under the authority of the District's Board of Directors, the Department Head in charge of the Records Management Program, or his or her designee, is responsible for oversight, implementation, administration, and operation of the District's Records Management Program. 3.2 All Division Managers are responsible for ensuring compliance with the approved Records Retention Schedule. Division Managers shall appoint a Records Coordinator who applies the Records Management Program policy. 3.3 The Division Records Coordinator facilitates program compliance within their respective Divisions in applying the Records Management Program policy. 3.4 All District employees are responsible for complying with the requirements of the Records Management Program policy and the District's Records Retention Schedule. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 1.0 Page 2 of 2 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date Issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 2 Revised: 04/27/2005 Subject: Records Management Program Policy 4.0 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES 4.1 Identify District records to facilitate access to information required to conduct District business and to provide appropriate access by the public. 4.2 Maintain District records for the duration of the approved retention period. 4.3 Provide access to District records for operating, legal or public requirements. 4.4 Protect District records. 4.5 Ensure compliance with legal statutes and governmental regulations regarding recordkeeping requirements. 4.6 Destroy District records in accordance with the approved records retention schedule or process historical records for long-term retention. 5.0 PROGRAM SCOPE 5.1 The program manages District records in all storage media including paper, microfilm, and other hard copy formats, optical images, electronic records and any other storage media that the District may use to maintain District records. 5.2 Maintain approved records retention schedule. 5.3 Ensure use of appropriate technology in facilitating records and information storage and retrieval. 6.0 APPLICABILITY 6.1 The policy applies to all District staff who create, receive or maintain District records. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 2.0 Page 1 of 5 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date Issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision 2 Revised: 4/27/2005 Subject: Program Guidelines 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The District-wide Records Management Program (the Program) is intended to effectively identify, manage, store, and destroy records that have been created and received by the District. 1.2 All records received and created by the District in fulfillment of their responsibility to the public and in compliance with government regulations are identified in the Records Retention Schedule (RRS), and accurate retention periods are assigned. 1.3 All District records that are no longer needed to be in the immediate office of each Division for convenient access are processed for storage, retrieval, or disposition in accordance with the guidelines established by the Program. 1.4 Records that have met the retention requirements identified in the RRS are processed for destruction in accordance with this Program. 1.5 Historical and vital records are identified and processed in accordance with the guidelines established by the Program. 1.6 Records management activities are completed in a cost-effective manner. 1.7 The Program promotes an increase in productivity by decreasing the volume of obsolete records stored; thus, reducing the amount of time necessary for document retrieval. 1.8 The Program contributes to industry best practices by ensuring accountability, efficiency, and compliance in a cost-effective manner. 2.0 PURPOSE 2.1 Identify District records to facilitate access to information required to conduct District business and to provide appropriate access by the public. 2.2 Maintain District records for the duration of the approved retention period. 2.3 Provide access to District records for operating, legal or public requirements. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 2.0 Page 2 of 5 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date Issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision 2 Revised: 4/27/2005 Subject: Program Guidelines 2.4 Protect District records. 2.5 Ensure compliance with legal statutes and governmental regulations regarding recordkeeping requirements. 2.6 Destroy District records in accordance with the approved records retention schedule or process historical records for long-term retention. 3.0 SCOPE 3.1 Create, receive, maintain and dispose of District Records. 3.2 Maintain approved Records Retention Schedule. 3.3 Ensure use of appropriate technology in facilitating records and information storage and retrieval. 3.4 Provide systematic control of all District records through processing, distribution, maintenance, and retrieval and disposition. 4.0 RECORDS 4.1 District records must be managed throughout their "life cycle". 4.2 Life cycle of a record is the time period from the creation or receipt of a record to the final disposition. 4.3 Final disposition can be either destruction or perpetual retention. 4.4 Life cycle of a record is inclusive of five (5) stages: • Stage 1 — Creation of receipt • Stage 2 — Use or distribution • Stage 3 — Storage or maintenance • Stage 4 — Retention or disposition ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 2.0 Page 3 of 5 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date Issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision 2 Revised: 4/27/2005 Subject: Program Guidelines • Stage 5 — Archival preservation 4.5 Some records do not require managing throughout their "life cycle". Such records are termed "transitory records". The value of transitory records is limited to a very short time, i.e., a day, week or a few months. 4.6 Transitory records do not carry the requirement to retain the documentation of any transaction. Transitory records include: • Extra copies of publications, pamphlets, blank forms. These are considered "supplies" rather than records. • Telephone messages. • Reference materials not produced by the District. • Working copies of documents used solely until the finished record is "rendered". • Notices of meetings, events, office or holiday gatherings, or employee meetings which do not relate directly to the functional responsibility of the organization. • Information copies of widely distributed District materials. • Preliminary drafts of documents such as letters, memoranda, reports, worksheets which do not represent significant steps in the preparation of District records, and which do not record decisions. Once the completed record is included in the filing system (in the appropriate medium), the working materials (drafts) are considered transitory records. • Catalogs, trade journals, and other published materials received from other organizations, commercial firms, vendors, or private institutions, which require no action and are not needed for documentary purposes. These materials are usually considered "library materials" and should be controlled as such, but are not District records. • Incorrect versions of documents, forms or reports that had to be regenerated in order to correct ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 2.0 Page 4of5 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date Issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision 2 Revised: 4/27/2005 Subject: Program Guidelines errors in typing, data entry, spelling, grammar, or format. 5.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE 5.1 The Records Retention Schedule (RRS) is a list of District records organized by record series to which are assigned retention periods and other attributes. 5.2 The retention periods identified in the RRS have been established after extensive legal research of all government regulations applicable to the District. 5.3 The RRS has been reviewed and has received concurrence of the various District Divisions, Legal Counsel, and the FAHR Committee, as well as the approval of the District Board of Directors for implementation. 5.4 The RRS has been developed to ensure that each Department maintains its records for the duration of the period legally required by applicable legal status and government regulations, and until all the operational business functions are met. 6.0 HISTORICAL RECORDS 6.1 Historical records are identified and preserved. 6.2 The program ensures that records with historical value are identified, documented and preserved for the life of the District. 6.3 The Records Management Staff, prior to processing records for destruction, shall identify records having historical significance. 6.4 Historical records are retrieved, prepared, and processed for preservation in accordance with Procedure 7.0. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 2.0 Page 5 of 5 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date Issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision 2 Revised: 4/27/2005 SuNect: Program Guidelines 7.0 VITAL RECORDS 7.1 Vital records are those documents identified by each Division as necessary to enable the District to continue vital operations in the event of a disaster or major interruption to business. 7.2 Vital records enable the District to reconstruct its legal obligations and rights. 7.3 Vital records enable the District to reconstruct its financial position. 7.4 Vital records enable the District to satisfy the District's obligations to its employees. 7.5 Vital records enable the District to protect employee and public health and safety. 7.6 Vital records enable the District to reconstruct its assets and ownership. 8.0 CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS 8.1 Records containing proprietary or sensitive information to which access must be restricted are considered confidential. 8.2 Confidential information must be protected and preserved to avoid unauthorized disclosure that could be harmful to a person, to the District, or to a District business process. 8.3 Confidential records shall be managed, controlled, and disposed of separately from records containing non- confidential information. 8.4 Confidentiality of information shall be protected until it is destroyed or until the District has changed the status of the confidentiality of information. 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 3.0 Page 1 of 2 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date Issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 3 Revised: 04/27/05 Subject: Staff Responsibilities 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Records Management Program is a decentralized administrative program. As such, Program activities are carried out by the District Records Management Staff and by District staff in each Division. The District Records Management Program is responsible for coordinating and managing the Program and Program procedures, and Division staff are responsible for complying with the Program requirements for records in their respective Divisions. In the procedures that follow, the individuals responsible for running the daily operations of the Program are identified as the "Records Management Staff". 2.0 PURPOSE: The purpose of this procedure is to describe the roles and responsibilities of the Records Management Staff and Division Staff. 3.0 STAFFING AND RESPONSIBILITIES Responsibility Action Records Management Staff • Oversee the Program and act as a liaison between Records Management Staff, the District's Board of Directors, and General Counsel. Records Management Staff • Coordinate public requests for information. • Act as an advisor on all records and information management issues and related projects. • Maintain the Records Retention Schedule. • Develop and conduct training sessions on appropriate Records Management Program activities. • Maintain the Program procedures manual. • Coordinate record destruction suspension ("holds") and destruction resumption ("releases") with legal counsel, auditors and the Office of Record to ensure that records are available as required. • Manage the records retention, transfer and destruction activities of the Program. 20RANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 3.0 Page 2 of 2 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date Issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 3 Revised: 04/27/05 Subject: Staff Responsibilities Responsibility Action • Conduct a periodic audit of the Program to ensure compliance. Records Management Staff • Coordinate vital records protection and ensure that the Vital Records Program supports the Integrated Emergency Response Plan. • Manage the Program database and content for the Intranet site. Division Records Coordinator Review the Division records and the Records Retention Schedule periodically to ensure that the Division is in compliance with the Program. • Forward any required changes to the Retention Schedule to the Records Management Staff. • Ensure that records are maintained and protected in compliance with the Program. • Coordinate preparation of records for transfer to offsite storage. • Coordinate managing pertinent records after receipt of a Records Hold or Records Release. • Coordinate records disposition activities, including preparing records destruction authorization notices and obtaining approvals. District Staff 0 Maintain records in compliance with the Program requirements. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 4.0 Page 1 of 11 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 4 Revised: 04/27/2005 Subject: Records Retention 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Records retention activities of the Records Management Program (RMP) control the maintenance and storage of District records. Following the retention procedures ensures compliance with pertinent statutory, regulatory, operating, and administrative recordskeeping requirements. In addition, it ensures that records needed to conduct District business are protected and accessible. The Records Retention Schedule (RRS) is the foundation of the Program and defines the period of time required to maintain the District records. 1.2 The Records Management Staff coordinated the initial records inventory from February through August of 2000. The inventory consisted of a physical inventory of records stored in active office work areas and various storage areas within the Plant 1 and Plant 2 facilities. The purpose of the inventory was to describe, identify, locate and quantify District records. To supplement the data gathered during the physical inventory, the staff coordinated the conduct of interviews with staff members from each Division who were most familiar with records creation and maintenance. 1.3 Based on the physical inventory of records and the data gathered during the interviews, the initial RRS was developed. Files were identified by their record titles and classified into record series based on having similar business functions (purposes) and retention requirements. 1.4 Extensive legal research was performed to ensure that all legal requirements were met in assigning the records retention periods to each records series. Other attributes were also assigned to each records series to ensure that vital, historical and confidential records are properly protected and processed for retention. 2.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE MAINTENANCE 2.1 The Records Retention Schedule is a list of District records organized by record series to which are assigned retention periods and other attributes. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 4.0 Page 2 of 11 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 4 Revised: 04 27 2005 Subject: Records Retention 2.2 A record series is comprised of similar or related record titles that have a similar business function (purpose), are normally used and filed as a unit, and are retained for a similar time period. 2.3 Following the retention standards of the schedule ensures that the District maintains appropriate records of District transactions and meets its legal obligations cost effectively, by storing records as long as is operationally and legally required. The RRS shall be reviewed, evaluated and updated periodically. 2.4 The retention periods assigned to each record series shall be maintained to meet changing business and legal requirements. Responsibility Action Records Management Coordinate the periodic update of the Records Title Staff List. • Provide training on RRS maintenance. Division Periodically (but not less than annually) review the Records Coordinator Records Title List and the RRS associated with records in the Division. • Match the Records Title List against records stored in the office, shop, field, and other storage locations. • Mark for deletion any record titles that are no longer maintained by the Division. • Note any new records titles that are not represented on the list. Include a description of the record, the business function, the operating record retention requirements, and special records characteristics (vital, historical or confidential). • Send the marked-up list to Records Managerment 3.0 RECORDS CLASSIFICATION 3.1 Record titles are classified into records series in order to facilitate assignment of retention times, legal citations, and the overall maintenance of District records. 3.2 Classifications contain like records titles grouped together based on similar business function, usage and retention time. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 4.0 Page 3 of 11 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 4 Revised: 04/27/2005 Subject: Records Retention 3.3 Records are classified by major and minor business functions of the records. Responsibility Action Records 0 Review the Record Title Lists completed by the Division Management Staff Records Coordinators. Determine in which records series the record titles logically belong. • Create a new record series if the record title does not logically belong to an existing series. Develop a definition for the records series. • Assign to the new record series the applicable characteristics (if any): vital, historical, or confidential, as indicated by the Division Records Coordinator. • Determine legal retention requirements by reviewing pertinent legal citations. • Provide direction to the Division Records Coordinators for the proper management of historical, vital and confidential records. 4.0 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE AMENDMENT 4.1 The Division Records Coordinator may request a change to the RRS at any time. Examples of changes that may initiate an amendment to the RRS include: • Change in the assigned Office of Record due to reorganization. • Change in the characteristics associated with the records: vital, historical, or confidential. • Change in the retention event associated with the records, for example: Closed, Complete, Expired, or Superseded. • Change in the legal and administrative requirements. • New records titles that are generated or used in performing business functions. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 4.0 Page 4 of 11 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 4 Revised: 04 27/2005 Subject: Records Retention • Change in the definition of the record series that applies to Division records. Responsibility I Action Division • Complete Form 100, Records Retention Schedule Change Request Records Coordinator Form. Use one form for each records series to be amended. For a change to the legal retention period, provide the text of the applicable statue or regulation. • Secure the Division Manager's approval. Division • Forward the approved Form 100 to Records Management. If the Records Coordinator change request was disapproved by Division management, file a copy for future reference. Records • Review the completed and Division-approved Form 100 and ensure Management Staff that required information is provided. • For a change to the legal retention period of an existing record series, ensure that the legal retention requirements of the record series are met and secure the approval of Legal Counsel. If Legal Counsel does not agree with the change request, return the change request to the Division Records Coordinator with an explanation. • For a change to add a new Record Series, ensure that an appropriate definition of the Record Series is provided, that the retention periods are identified, and that an applicable legal citation is identified, if applicable. • For a change to the official or duplicate retention periods, ensure that the change is in accordance with the District's RMP policies and applicable legal requirements. • Update the RRS and prepare a revised RRS for approval. • Send a copy of the newly revised RRS to the District Board Secretary for review and concurrence by the FAHR Committee. • Periodically review the text of the statutes and regulations governing recordskeeping requirements of the District and update the RRS as required. • Incorporate all comments received from the FAHR Committee. • Forward a copy of the revised RRS to the Board Secretary to secure the approval of the Board of Directors. • Update Program database and Intranet site as required. • Distribute the updated RRS. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 4.0 Page S of 11 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 4 Revised: 04/27/2005 Subject: Records Retention 5.0 RECORDS PURGE 5.1 Eliminate records from active files, and their timely destruction after all legal and business requirements have been met. 5.2 Only records that are useful in current business activities are retained, enabling timely retrieval of frequently used records. 5.3 Records with research or historical value are preserved in a controlled environment. 5.4 Records that are vital to the District to re-establish or to continue critical operations in the event of disaster are preserved in a controlled and safe environment. 5.5 Integrity of the records is preserved. 5.6 Prompt disposal of records is completed when their retention period is met. Responsibility Action Records Issue a report to all Division Records Coordinators with the Management Staff following information specific to each Division: • Records Titles • Records Series • Retention Periods • Office of Record Division Review the report received from the Records Management Records Coordinator Staff. • Match the active (in office) files with the records titles listed in the report and the records series assigned to it. • Check the record retention period assigned to the records series. • Identify the records series eligible for destruction by calculating the retention period. Use the examples in the chart below to determine retention. • If there are records identified to have met their established ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 4.0 Page 6 of 11 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 4 Revised: 04 27 2005 Subject: Records Retention retention periods, these are now considered obsolete records. Follow the instructions described in Procedures 5.0 to disposition obsolete records. • If there are records identified to have not met their retention period but are no longer required to be maintained in the immediate office area, complete Form 102, Records Storage Transfer Request. Records may be transferred to storage at any time during their mandated retention period. Determining when, if ever, to transfer records, is based on the amount of storage area in the office or work area, and the type and frequency of access required. Determine retention period of each record series by using the following chart: Retention Date Retain Until Destroy After Period of Record 5 years 1995 December 31 2000 January 1 2001 CL (Closed) 1995 Close of project or January 1, 1998 transaction (for example, (After the end of the year that May 31, 1997) the project or transaction is closed or completed.) CL+5 (Closed 1995 Close of project or January 1, 2003 (The end of the plus 5 years) transaction (May 31, year that the project or 1997) plus 5 years transaction is closed or completed, plus 5 ears 6.0 INACTIVE RECORDS TRANSFER AND STORAGE 6.1 Inactive records are those records that have not met their required retention periods, but are no longer current or frequently referenced. 6.2 Inactive files management standards are established by the District to ensure that District records remain accessible and ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 4.0 Page 7 of 11 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 4 Revised: 04/27 2005 Subject: Records Retention protected throughout the duration of their required retention periods. 6.3 Active files are periodically reviewed to identify those records that are inactive. Inactive records that are identified during the review are purged from active file areas and processed for offsite storage. Systematic control of inactive records consists of: • properly packing the records in archival storage boxes that are properly labeled • preparing an index of the content of the box and its location in the storage area • and transferring the boxes to offsite, low-cost storage How to transfer inactive records for offsite storage Responsibility Action Division • Periodically review the records stored in active office, field Records office, shops, or other work areas to determine if they are Coordinator still active or if they have become inactive. Division • If the records have become inactive, prepare them for Records transfer to an offsite facility storage approved by the Coordinator District. • Use the following measurements when estimating the number of standard archival storage boxes needed. If the records to be transferred are oversized (ledgers, drawings, poster board, etc.) call the Records Manager Management Staff for assistance in estimating the number and type of storage containers required. • 14.5 inches of records for each standard archival storage box to store letter-size (8-1/2 x 11 inches) records. 10 inches of records for each standard archival storage boxes to store legal-size (11 x 14 inches) records. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 4.0 Page 8 of 11 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 4 Revised: 04/27/2005 Subject: Records Retention Responsibility Action Division Follow the guidelines below when packing the records: Records Each box shall only contain official inactive records. Non- Coordinator records and duplicate records should not be transferred to offsite storage. These records should remain in the active storage area until their assigned retention periods expire. They are destroyed in the active office area as appropriate. • Do not pack different record series in the same archival box. Records series packed together should have the same destruction date. This facilitates records review and destruction. • Records shall be placed in file order in the box. For example, if the records are filed by date or by number, maintain that order when transferring records. • Do not over pack the box. The lid must fit securely on top of the box. Use reinforcement bracing material in the event the box is not filled (such as crumpled paper or cardboard). • Prepare an inventory of the box contents and attach it to Form 102. Division • Place a copy of completed Form 102 and the inventory Records inside the box. Coordinator • Schedule the pick-up and transfer of the box(es) to the offsite storage by contacting the Records Management Staff. Records • Review all the documentation submitted. Ensure that it is Management accurate and complete. Staff • Assign and affix barcodes to transfer form and box. • Enter the information in the RMP database. • Contact the offsite storage center and arrange the transfer of the boxes. • Ensure that an acknowledgement receipt of the boxes is received from the offsite storage center. • Resolve any questions or problems that may arise during transfer of boxes. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 4.0 Page 9 of 11 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 4 Revised: 04/27 2005 Subject: Records Retention 7.0 PURGING NON-RECORDS 7.1 Non-records can be purged from file storage equipment and destroyed as soon as their usefulness in the performance of business functions is met. 7.2 Files that may be found in the active files during purging that have limited value and usually have very short retention requirements are termed non-records in this procedure. 7.3 Do not send non-records to offsite storage. Non-records include: • Extra copies of publications, pamphlets. • Blank forms, which are considered supplies. • Telephone messages and telephone books or directories. • Working copies of documents used solely until the finished record is rendered. • Notices of meetings, events, office or holiday gatherings, or employee meetings that do not relate directly to the functional responsibility of the organization. • Information copies of widely distributed District materials. • Preliminary drafts of documents such as letters, memoranda, reports, worksheets which do not represent significant steps in the preparation of District records, and which do not record decisions. Once the completed record is included in the filing system, the working materials (drafts) are considered non-records. • Catalogs, trade journals, and other published materials received from other organizations, commercial firms, vendors, or private institutions, which require no action and are not needed for documentary purposes. These materials are usually considered "library materials" and should be controlled as such, but are not District records. • Incorrect versions of documents, forms or reports that had to be regenerated in order to correct errors in typing, data entry, spelling, grammar, or format. 8.0 RETRIEVING BOXES FROM OFFSITE STORAGE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 4.0 Page 10 of 11 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 4 Revised: 04/27/2005 Subject: Records Retention 8.1 Inactive records may be retrieved from the offsite storage center at any time. 8.2 Records may be retrieved by staff from the Division designated as "owner" of the records. 8.3 In the event that staff from a Division other than the owner require access to the records, the retrieval request shall be approved by the Records Management Staff and the Division that owns the records. 8.4 Retrieval of confidential records requires the approval of the Records Management Staff to ensure protection from unauthorized access. 8.5 Retrieval of historical records requires the approval of the Records Management Staff to ensure protection and preservation of the records. 8.6 Boxes retrieved from the offsite storage center shall be returned to the center with the same records and in the same order as when they were received. 8.7 Records should not be removed, nor should additional records be added. 8.8 If the box contents must be altered, contact the Records Management Staff. Responsibility Action Requestor • Complete Form 104, Inactive Records Retrieval Request • Forward to the applicable Division Records Coordinator. Division • Review the form for completion. Forward the form to the Records Coordinator Records Management Staff. Records • Review the completed form for completion and resolve any Management Staff questions. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 4.0 Page 11 of 11 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 4 Revised: 04/27/2005 Subject: Records Retention • Request retrieval of boxes from the offsite storage center. Requestor • Return the box to the Records Management Staff with the same records and in the same order as received. • Contact the Division Records Coordinator if there is a need to remove or change the contents of the box. Division • Coordinate any changes that need to be done with the Records Records Coordinator Management Staff. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 5.0 Page 1 of 5 Records Management Date Issued: 11/17/2000 Procedure Manual Revision: 2 Revised: 04/27/05 Subject: Records Disposition 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Records disposition is the set of actions taken with regard to inactive records as determined through records appraisal. 1.2 Records disposition includes determining whether District records are eligible for destruction (records have been determined to be obsolete) or for long-term preservation (records have been determined to be historical records). 2.0 PURPOSE 2.1 The purpose of this procedure is to describe the procedures for dispositioning obsolete and historical District records in an organized and efficient manner. 2.2 This procedure ensures that appropriate review and approval are completed prior to destruction or long-term storage of District records. 2.3 This procedure ensures that records that have been designated obsolete, but that are subject to legal or audit holds, are maintained until resolution of the legal matter or conclusion of the audit. 3.0 PROCEDURES 3.1 Records are periodically reviewed in order to identify those records that have met the required retention periods established in the Records Retention Schedule (RRS). 3.2 The review activity usually groups records into three disposition groups: • 3.2.1 Obsolete Records: Records that have met the required retention are considered obsolete and are processed for destruction. • 3.2.2 Inactive Records: Records that have not met their retention periods, but are no longer required to be in the immediate office area, are considered inactive and are processed for offsite storage. See Procedure 4.0. • 3.2.3 Historical Records: Records that have met their business function retention requirements, but have historical or intrinsic value, are considered ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 5.0 Page 2 of 5 Records Management Date Issued: 11/17/2000 Procedure Manual Revision: 2 Revised: 04/27/05 Subject: Records Disposition historical records and are processed for long-term storage. See Procedure 8.0. 4.0 Processing Official District Records For Destruction 4.1 Destruction of the official version of District records requires the approval of the following: • Head of Office of Record • Records Manager • Historical Records Coordinator • Legal Counsel 4.2 Procedures to process obsolete records for destruction are included in the following chart Responsibility Action Records Management Periodically issue a report to all Records Coordinators with the Staff following information: • Records Title • Records Series • Retention Period • Office of Record Division Records Review the report with the existing records currently maintained in Coordinators the office area or stored offsite. Check the records titles included in the records series listed in the RRS. Calculate destruction dates using the example in the chart below. • Purge the files in accordance with Procedure 4.0. • If there are records identified to have met the required retention periods, complete Form 101, Authorization Request for Destruction of District Records. Note: If the volume of records to be destroyed requires a multi-page listing, use Form 101 as an approval coversheet and attach the listing to the coversheet. Approval signatures are required only on the coversheet. • Secure the approval of the Division Manager. Division Manager Review the completed forms and authorize approval to destroy District records by signing the forms. If you do not approve, state the reason and return the forms to Division Records Coordinator. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 5.0 Page 3 of 5 Records Management Date Issued: 11/17/2000 Procedure Manual Revision: 2 Revised: 04/27/05 Subject: Records Disposition Responsibility Action Division Records If the request for destruction has been authorized by Division Coordinator management, estimate the volume of records to be destroyed. Request empty boxes for transferring obsolete records to be destroyed (Form 103). • Return the approved Form 101 and Form 103 to Records Management. • If the request for destruction has been disapproved, contact the Records Management Staff. Reasons for postponing scheduled destruction may include ongoing or pending audits or investigations or litigation. • Forward all the completed forms to the Records Manager for further processing. Records Management • Review the approved forms and determine if these records have Staff historical value. • If there are records identified to contain historical value to the District, process the records as detailed in RMP Procedure 8.0, Historical Records Program. • If there are no historical records identified, sign the forms approving destruction. • Send to Legal Counsel for review and approval. Legal Counsel • Determine whether to approve or disapprove the request for destruction of records. • If approved, return the form to the Records Management Staff. • If not approved, request that a Legal Hold be placed on the record series: • state the reason for the Legal Hold (pending audit, investigation or litigation) • estimated length of time to hold the records • Return the Destruction Approval to the Records Management Staff. Records Management • If approved, send a copy of the approved forms with the requested Staff empty temporary storage boxes to the Records Coordinator. • If the request for destruction of records is disapproved: • Update the RMP database. • Advise the Department of the decision. • Resolve any problems. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 5.0 Page 4 of 5 Records Management Date Issued: 11/17/2000 Procedure Manual Revision: 2 Revised: 04/27/05 Sect: Records Disposition Responsibility Action Division Records If approved, transfer the files approved for destruction to the Coordinator temporary storage boxes provided. • Place a copy of the approved Form 101 in the box of records to be destroyed and send the box to the Records Management Staff. • If not approved, due to Legal Hold, maintain records until notification of the release of the records from Legal Hold is received. Proceed with the destruction procedures. • If not approved, due to Historical Records designation, box records and transfer to the Records Management Staff. Records Management • Coordinate destruction of records. If the records are confidential, Staff arrange for destruction that will protect the confidentiality of the information. • Select, assign and authorize a District employee to witness destruction of confidential records. • After destruction, ensure that a Certificate of Destruction is properly completed and signed. • Send a copy of the Certificate of Destruction to the Division Records Coordinator. • Maintain the Certificate of Destruction in the appropriate files. • Update the RMP database. Examples of How to Determine Destruction Dates Retention Date of Retain Until Destroy After Period Record 5 years 1995 December 31, 2000 January 1, 2001 CL (Closed) 1995 Close of project or January 1, 1998 transaction (for example, (After the end of the year that the May 31, 1997) project or transaction is closed or completed.) CL+5 (Closed 1995 Close of project or January 1, 2003 (The end of the plus 5 years) transaction (May 31, year that the project or transaction 1997) plus 5 years is closed or completed, plus 5 ears ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 5.0 Page 5 of 5 Records Management Date Issued: 11/17/2000 Procedure Manual Revision: 2 Revised: 04/27/05 Subject: Records Disposition 5.0 Processing Duplicate District Records For Destruction 5.1 Duplicate records are the record series maintained by Divisions that are not identified as Office of Record in the RRS. 5.2 Retention periods of duplicate files are identified in the RRS. These are the maximum retention periods allowed for the duplicate records. 5.3 Duplicate records may be destroyed at any time during and up to the end of the assigned duplicate retention time. 5.4 Duplicate records should not be transferred or stored offsite. They are destroyed when the retention requirements of these records are met as established in the RRS. 5.5 Duplicate records are destroyed in the office or work area. 5.6 No formal destruction authorization is required to destroy duplicate records. 5.7 If the records contain confidential information, they should be shredded or otherwise destroyed to protect the confidentiality of the information. If they records are not confidential, they may be recycled or discarded. 6.0 Preservation, Protection, and Destruction of Confidential Records 6.1 Confidential records are those records containing information that is proprietary or sensitive to which access must be restricted. 6.2 Confidential information must be protected and preserved to avoid unauthorized disclosure that could be harmful to a person, to the District, or to a District business process. 6.3 Confidential records shall be managed, controlled, and dispositioned separately from records containing non-confidential information. 6.4 Confidentiality of information shall be protected until it is destroyed or until the District has changed the status of the confidentiality of information. 6.5 The Office of Record for record series designated as confidential shall destroy the official copy of confidential records following the same procedures detailed in this procedure. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 6.0 Page 1 of 6 Records Management Date Issued: 11/17/2000 Procedure Manual Revision: 2 Revised: 04/27/05 Subject: Vital Records Program 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Vital records are those documents that contain information that enables the District to continue vital and critical operations in the event of a major interruption to business. 1.2 Such interruptions could be natural disasters (for example, earthquake or flood) or man-made disasters (for example, accidental fire, arson or civil unrest) which result in the loss of the normal means of access to vital records. 1.3 In most organizations, vital records comprise between 2 and 5 percent of the total record volume. During the initial records inventory vital records titles were identified and assigned to records series. The vital records series are identified on the Records Retention Schedule. 2.0 PURPOSE 2.1 The purpose of the vital records management is to ensure that vital records are identified, protected and accessible during or shortly following a disaster. 3.0 SCOPE 3.1 Vital records are either irreplaceable or very difficult to replace and they are required to continue critical District business. 3.2 Absence of vital records, or the inability to locate or translate vital records (in the case of machine-readable or digital records) means that the District could not provide critical services to the public and its employees during a disaster or shortly thereafter. 3.3 Vital records are maintained and protected in the format (paper, microfilm, digital, etc.) that is most appropriate for efficient retrieval. 3.4 Vital records include records that enable the District to: 3.4.1 Provide required District safety and health services during and immediately following a disaster or other major interruption to business. 3.4.2 Meet the obligations to District employees and retirees. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 6.0 Page 2 of 6 Records Management Date Issued: 11/17/2000 Procedure Manual Revision: 2 Revised: 04/27/05 Subject: Vital Records Program 3.4.3 Reconstruct legal obligations and rights. 3.4.4 Establish the financial position of the District. 3.4.5 Reconstruct the District's assets and ownership. 4.0 PROCEDURES Responsibility I Action Records [Develop procedures for protecting vital records, either by storing them onsite in Management fire-resistive equipment, or by sending copies offsite. Staff Identify viable onsite or remote storage sites for records protection. [Develop and distribute schedule of vital records copying and transfer to onsite vault or remote storage location. [Coordinate vital records protection procedures with the District's Integrated Emergency Response Plan. [Develop procedures for retrieving vital records within identified time requirements following a disaster event. [Coordinate, identify and develop agreements with vendors to provide records retrieval or recovery services required following a disaster. [Work with the Risk Manager to ensure the Vital Records Management Program meets District needs. Risk Manager [Review the vital records procedures to ensure that vital District interests are protected and to ensure minimum exposure to risk in the event of a disaster. Division [Identify vital records based on an evaluation of business functions. Records Coordinator [Comply with procedures that protect vital records. [Determine the best method (appropriate media and onsite or offsite storage) to protect the Department's vital records series and ensure their availability in the event of a disaster. [Determine the frequency with which vital records must be stored onsite in special protective equipment. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 6.0 Page 3 of 6 Records Management Date Issued: 11/17/2000 Procedure Manual Revision: 2 Revised: 04/27/05 Subject: Vital Records Program Eq Determine the frequency with which vital records must be stored offsite. Routinely copy and forward vital records to onsite or offsite protective storage facilities. 5.0 Vital Records Categories 5.1 The following is a list of the record categories that are usually considered vital. The Records Series containing vital records are identified as such on the Records Retention Schedule. Vital Record Example Category Financial [Accounts receivable [Loan payments [General ledger [Registers proving payment [Statements [Tax returns [Fixed asset inventories Negotiable [Stock certificates instruments [Bonds [Checks [Notes [Payroll [a Benefits [Retiree benefits [Claims ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 6.0 Page 4 of 6 Records Management Date Issued: 11/17/2000 Procedure Manual Revision: 2 Revised: 04/27/05 Subject: Vital Records Program Ownership E:4Deeds Leases [Titles (Capital investments District [District Charter or Formation records Administration [Resolutions [Delegation of Authority [Board meeting minutes [Ordinances Contracts / [Major capital improvements or construction contracts or other major Agreements agreements Insurance [Policies and Endorsements Engineering [Drawings EgSpecifications [Maps Computer Software EgCode Applications [Software Licenses [Manuals (if created by District) 6.0 Vital Records Format 6.1 Select the format for protecting and maintaining vital records that ensures accessibility and usability during a disaster or emergency response: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 6.0 Page 5 of 6 Records Management Date Issued: 11/17/2000 Procedure Manual Revision: 2 Revised: 04/27/05 Subject: Vital Records Program 6.1.1.1 Source document (original or designated official version, regardless of format). 6.1.1.2 Distributed copy (copy of record that is routinely distributed). 6.1.1.3 Reproduced copy (hard copy of record that is copied for Vital Records Program needs). 6.1.1.4 Microfilm (microfilm of record that is filmed for Vital Records Program needs). 6.1.1.5 Optical (optical image record that is filmed for Vital Records Program needs). 6.1.1.6 Magnetic Tape (digital version of vital record). 6.2 Select Vital Records Protection Methods 6.2.1 Select the method most appropriate to protect the vital record: 6.2.1.1 Verify existing dispersal of record, ensure that vital records are available in multiple, geographically separate locations as part of normal business activities. 6.2.1.2 Improve dispersal by initiating distribution of copies of vital records to a secure location at the time of document creation. 6.2.1.3 Duplicate records by reproducing copies of vital records in a medium appropriate to efficient storage and use and send to a secure location. 6.2.1.4 Move vital records from active use areas when no longer needed for active reference and send to a secure location. 6.2.1.5 Store vital records on site in secure location, such as the vault, that meets NFPA standards for fire-resistance. 6.3 Select Vital Records Update Frequency 6.3.1 Determine how often it is necessary to update vital records to ensure that the information is current: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 6.0 Page 6of6 Records Management Date Issued: 11/17/2000 Procedure Manual Revision: 2 Revised: 04/27/05 Subject: Vital Records Program 6.3.1.1 Hourly 6.3.1.2 Daily 6.3.1.3 Weekly 6.3.1.4 Monthly 6.3.1.5 Quarterly 6.3.1.6 Annually ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 7.0 Page 1 of 3 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date Issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 2 Revised: 04 27 2005 Subject: Historical Records 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is the policy of the Orange County Sanitation District to identify and permanently preserve records that have historical significance for the District. The Historical Records Program has been established to realize these policy goals. 2.0 PURPOSE 2.1 The purpose of the Historical Records Program is to ensure that all District records reviewed for historical value prior to destruction through the application of well-accepted appraisal criteria. 2.2 Historical records are processed according to standard archival practice to ensure their permanent preservation. 3.0 PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITY 3.1 The Historical Records Management Program is administered under the authority of the District's Records Management Program. 3.2 Both the Office of Record and the District's Records Management Staff have a direct role in the implementation of the Historical Records Management Program. 4.0 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES 4.1 The objectives of the Historical Records Management Program are to: 4.1.1 Identify District records of historical value. 4.1.2 Process District records of historical value in a manner that will ensure that they are permanently preserved. 4.1.3 Prepare a guide to the District's historical records to facilitate access to the records by District staff and outside researchers. 4.1.4 Promote the use of the District's historical records in such areas as agency planning, management, development, public relations and litigation support. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 7.0 Page 2 of 3 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date Issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 2 Revised: 04/27 2005 Subject: Historical Records 5.0 PROGRAM SCOPE 5.1 The scope of the Historical Records Program includes the identification of records designated as historical on the retention schedule, the application of standard appraisal criteria at the end of the official retention period and the processing and arrangement of historical records. 5.1.1 Processing and arrangement include: 5.1.1.1 Removal of hardware (staples, brads, and other fasteners) 5.1.1.2 Placing documents in acid free folders and boxes that meet the standards for archival preservation. 5.1.1.3 Creation of a historical records series. 5.1.1.4 Preparation of inventories and finding guides to the historical records. 6.0 Program Procedures 6.1 The policy applies to all District staff who create, receive or maintain District records. Responsibility I Action Office of Record Identifies records that are part of record series designated historical on the Records Retention Schedule. Reviews records for historical value under appraisal criteria at the end of the official retention period with particular attention to the following record series: Administrative Records Meeting Minutes Project Files Speeches and Presentations ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 7.0 Page 3 of 3 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date Issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 2 Revised: 04 27/2005 Subject: Historical Records If records included in these records series contain records of historical value, notify the Records Manager. Records Receives records identified as historical from the Office of Record. Management Staff Creates a historical record series for these records. Processes the historical record series, including the preparation of the inventory and scope note for each series. Determines the best preservation medium for historical records - hard copy of microfilm. Disseminates information about the Historical Records Program and its holdings throughout the District. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Procedure 8.0 Page 1 of 1 RECORDS MANAGEMENT Date Issued: 11/17/2000 PROCEDURE MANUAL Revision: 2 Revised: 04/27/2005 Subject: Records Management Program Audit and Compliance Review 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The records Management Program audit and compliance review monitors compliance with the Program. 1.2 Periodically, but no less than annually, the Records Management Staff conducts a compliance audit with several Divisions. 1.3 All Divisions must complete the audit process every two years. 2.0 PURPOSE 2.1 The purpose of the Records Management Program Compliance Review procedures is to ensure that all District records are created, received, maintained and dispositioned in accordance with the Board approved Records Management Policy and Procedure. 3.0 PROGRAM PROCEDURES Responsibility Action Records [Compare records scheduled to be destroyed with those actually destroyed by the Division. Management Staff gNote records series destroyed prematurely. gNote records series that have been retained beyond the approved destruction date. g W rite a summary report of findings with recommended corrective action, such as additional training or revisions to existing documentation. Division Records gAssist the Records Management Staff in conducting the records compliance review in the Coordinator designated Division. g Respond to the summary audit report findings by identifying which corrective actions are planned or have been completed. glnform the Records Management Staff of changes within the Division and business practices that potentially may have an effect on the Records Management Program. FAH R COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 04/13/05 04/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR05-27 14(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Blake Anderson. General Manager SUBJECT: Strategic Planning/EMT Development GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to issue a purchase order contract to Dharma Consulting to provide continuing professional services to assist executive and senior staff with ongoing strategic planning, executive management team coaching and team development; and staff team building. for a monthly amount not to exceed $15,000. for up to 12 months, for a total amount not to exceed $180,000. SUMMARY Coordinating and prioritizing all of our ongoing initiatives continues as one of the most challenging jobs for your General Manager, the EMT, the division managers and the 600 employees who work here. In that context, we are improving internal communications, emphasizing team building and improving meeting effectiveness so that we can manage all of this work. We have been employing the help of a business and communication consultant on a month-to-month basis for approximately 25 months to facilitate the planning and communication necessary to make all of this happen effectively. Coaching and team building sessiort6. facilitated strategic planning. goal-setting workshops, and one-on-one sessions have helped us to align and unify all of the work we are doing. The process has been helpful. We want it to continue. The purpose of this agenda item is to recommend that we continue this relationship with Dharma Consulting and to establish a month-to-month retainer contract with the firm. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION We are managing a remarkable set of initiatives. Besides the day-to-day challenge of keeping the plants and our regular business running, we are administering the longest list of large projects ever faced by the Sanitation District. The most significant include the $2.8 billion CIP program, interim secondary treatment upgrades. operating interim disinfection and planning long-term disinfection, in-county biosolids management, asset management and other business improvement initiatives, a new ocean discharge permit and its associated marine monitoring program, the Groundwater Replenishment System, employee development, succession planning and many smaller-scale initiatives residing across the agency. Managing these initiatives is itself an initiative. H tdeptlagenda%BOARDA-1t2005BO-110405\ltem 14(d)Manna Consulting doe Revised 06/04/03 Page 1 We are asking a lot of our staff. To work more effectively and become more focused on follow-through, they must know where we are headed—and why. For this reason, we pay attention to how we convey information to our staff and to ourselves. The values and reasons we are pursuing all of these initiatives provide the buy-in and meaningful commitment we need. Compliance with directives from the general manager or upper management is simply insufficient. Staff has been in the midst of a long-term tactical and strategic process to coordinate all of this simultaneously—resolving ongoing conflicts of priorities, managing staff commitments, communicating our overall intention to staff, and making changes to our original intentions when new information gives us reason to do so. That work began 26 months ago when the EMT began meeting regularly in a series of retreats to map out the future of the Sanitation District so that we could establish comprehensive goals and objectives that would help to manage all of the initiatives. Twenty-four months ago, the EMT proposed, and the board adopted, four unifying strategies that now serve as guideposts for management and staff. The four unifying strategies are: 1. Environmental Stewardship: OCSD will participate collaboratively in the protection of regional water resources for the benefit of the people we serve. 2. Business Principle: OCSD will make every decision based on short- and long- term environmental, societal, and financial impacts (the triple bottom line). 3. Wastewater Management: OCSD will beneficially reuse and recycle water and other resources using safe and effective wastewater systems. 4. Workplace Environment: OCSD will provide an environment of partnership, growth, opportunity, responsibility and accountability. Twenty months ago, the EMT and managers began working together to start a long- term and ongoing strategic planning process that supports the initiatives listed above. Dharma Consulting has been involved in this work for the last 28 months conducting planning meetings to grapple with all of this change, facilitating meetings of the Executive Management Team, the division managers, and specific groups of staff working on certain initiatives. Dharma has helped to design our strategic process, to provide training for participants, to coach EMT and the General Manager, and to help us facilitate meaningful change in the organization. The work ahead, for which we need Dharma Consulting's help during the next twelve months, includes: - Training collaborative skills for several groups working on various initiatives - Coaching team leaders - Coaching the EMT - Facilitating internal workshops for staff - Training and facilitating change agent course work - Integrating business planning with unifying strategies H ldeptlagenda\BOARDA-112005BO-11040511tem 14(d)Dharma Consulting doc Revised 06/04/03 Page 2 - Strengthening a culture of accountability, collaboration and shared leadership - Integrating new EMT members (3 new out of the eight) PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS At the June 23, 2004 Board meeting, General Manager was authorized to issue a purchase order contract to Dharma Consulting to provide continuing professional services to assist executive and senior staff with ongoing strategic planning, executive management team coaching and team development; and staff team building, for a monthly amount not to exceed $15,000 for a maximum of nine months effective July 1, 2004. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY $15,000/month retainer for twelve months, covering all hourly fees and associated expenses and training materials. Dharma's knowledge of OCSD business practices is already established and therefore brings additional value to this process. BUDGET IMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 2004-05 and 2005-06 Budgets-- 110.52340-$185,000 each) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES It is certainly possible for staff to do this work without the help of a consultant. However, we don't have the skills needed to effectively plan and facilitate this work. It is impractical to acquire new staff to do the work, because the work is relatively short-lived and the skill sets are not normally held by public agency staff. A knowledgeable consultant is an efficient way to provide the support. ATTACHMENTS N/A BPA:gg hAdept\admin\110\anderson blaWcommittees 2005\041305 fahr ar dharma consulting.doc H\dep1%agenda\BOARDA-112005BO-1\040511tem 14(d).Dharma Consulting.doc Revised: 06/04103 Page 3 FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 04/13/05 04/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR05-28 14(e) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL SEWER SERVICE FEE RATE ADJUSTMENTS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Recommend to the Board of Directors the approval of new non-residential user fee codes for Laundromats and Nightclubs, and set the user fee rates equivalent to 1.800 percent and 200 percent of the Single-Family Residential Rate per 1,000 Square Feet, respectively; and adjust the user fee rate for Motels downward from 97 percent to 70 percent of the Single-Family Residence rate per 1,000 square feet. SUMMARY Over the past few months, staff has reevaluated the use codes and billing methods within the District's sewer service fee ordinance and has identified the need to establish two additional use codes for Laundromats and Nightclubs, and lower the user fee rate to the existing use code for Motels. In addition, staff is not recommending a reduced rate for low usage single-family residences due to the relatively small inequities amongst all single family residences. Staff believes the additional costs to implement, monitor and administer a low-usage program out weighs the potential benefits to the individual user. All FAHR Committee recommended changes will be incorporated into the sanitary sewer user fee ordinance to be introduced at the April board meeting. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS Adoption of Ordinance No. OCSD- 24, "Adopting Revised Table G re Permittee Charges for Use and Reaffirming all other Charges" in November 2004. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A H,\dept\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2005 Board Agenda&Agenda Reports\0405Utem 14(e)Non-residential rate adjustments doc Revised 06/04/03 Page 1 BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION See the attached staff report. ALTERNATIVES 1) Do not establish separate use codes for Laundromats and Nightclubs, and instead use another non-residential rate. 2) Do not lower the user fee rate for the use code for Motels. 3) Direct staff to bring back a recommendation for implementing a reduced rate for low usage single family residences. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS See the attached Staff Report. H WepttagendatBoard Agenda ReportsQ005 Board Agenda&Agenda Reponst0405\Item 14(e)Non-residential rate adjustments doc Revised 06/04/03 Page 2 U ANI e� CJ p l 6 TM April 6, 2005 STAFF REPORT Proposed Non-Residential Sewer Service Fee Rate Adjustments Background The major revenue source of the District is the sewer service fee that is assessed on each improved parcel within the District's service area through the property tax bill of the County of Orange (County), and then subsequently collected and remitted by the County to the District. The sewer service fee covers the District's cost of collection, treatment and disposal of all wastewater received from the individual parcels. The fees are established by ordinance of the District Board and vary according to the use of the parcel and the level of service that is required. The District service area includes 500,000 parcels, approximately 475,000 of which indicate improvements and are included in the District's sewer service fee program. Of these 475,000 improved parcels, approximately 428,500 parcels are single or multi- family residential parcels. The remaining 46,500 parcels consist of commercial, industrial, and governmental classifications, and have the most potential for reclassification and additional revenue. The single family residents are assessed a flat rate fee, the multi-family residents are charged a flat rate fee on a per unit basis and commercial, industrial, and governmental, parcels are assessed a fee per 1,000 square foot of building improvements based on their individual property user fee code. Commercial user fees generate approximately$29 million each year. These properties are billed a rate per thousand square feet which corresponds to the specific use code of their property. The use code and square footage have been obtained through the Orange County Assessor Office Data Center, a main frame program, updated every 12 months. In October of 2003, the District moved this database in-house and designed a program specific for our use. As a result, we have more flexibility and total control over how the database is used. For example, when construction or demolition takes place, we can ensure square footage changes are effective immediately. Our foremost concern is the accuracy of the use code and square footage information that we use to calculate the fees for our customers. Over the past few months, staff has re-evaluated the use codes and billing methods that are currently in the District's sewer service fee ordinance and have identified four areas that have potential for improvements or modification. This report outlines these four areas and the recommended billing solution for each. OCSD ♦ P.O.Box 8127 • Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 • (714)962-2411 Sewer Service Fee Billing Methods April 6, 2005 Page 2 of 3 Laundromats There is no Laundromat use code in the District's sewer service fee ordinance and the District currently has no way of accurately billing parcels that contain only Laundromats. Staff has obtained the flow, chemical oxygen demand (COD), and suspended solids (SS) assumptions used by the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (CSDLAC) within their sewer service fee program and converted their load measurement of COD to the District's load measurement of bio-chemical oxygen demand (BOD). Based on the proportion of flow, BOD, and SS concentrations for Laundromats used by CSDLAC to the District's flow, BOD, and SS concentrations for Single Family Residences (SFR), staff is recommending a new use code, Laundromat (223), which will charge 1,800 percent of the SFR rate per 1,000 square feet. This rate would have been $2,070 per 1,000 square feet for FY 2004-05. Nightclubs There currently is no Nightclub user fee code within the District's sewer service fee ordinance. During the District's FY 2004-05 review of all 46,500 commercial parcels for verification of square footage improvements and property use, staff discovered some Nightclubs located on their own individual parcels. Staff has obtained the Flow, COD, and SS assumptions from CSDLAC and again using the methodology described above for Laundromats, calculated the percentage per 1,000 square feet to charge a Nightclub in our service area. Staff is recommending a new use code, Nightclub (224), which will charge 200 percent of the SFR per 1,000 square feet. This rate would have been $230 per 1 ,000 square feet for FY 2004-05. Motels Staff recently sampled seven (7) motels within the District's service area for the volume and strength of flows being discharged in the sewer system. The results of the study indicated that the average flow, BOD, and TSS levels being discharged were less than what is current built into the billing rate concentration assumptions, generating an overall reduction in the user fee rate by 27 percent. Therefore, staff is recommending that the user fee rate for "Motels" be reduced from the current level of 97 percent of SFR to 70 percent of SFR. The proposed changes will result in decreased fees from 378 parcels. SFR Reduced Rate for Low-Usage From time to time, we have had single-family residence owners ask if we have a low-income or low-usage program. The homeowners are generally elderly or retired 1 Sewer Service Fee Billing Methods April 6, 2005 Page 3 of 3 homeowners who may use less water than an average single-family residence. We have investigated the reduced rate program used by the CSDLAC. CSDLAC SFR rate assumes an average discharge of 260 gallons per day. A homeowner within their service area may submit water consumption for a one year period and, if the consumption is 200 gpd or less, they qualify for a reduced rate that is equal to the apartment sewer service fee rate (currently 60% of the SFR rate at LA County). Currently, we assume 253 gallons per day for a single family residence. The Board may adopt a reduced rate program where a homeowner that proves they use less than 200 gallons per day would qualify for a reduced rate equal to the District's apartment sewer service fee rate, or 70% of the SFR rate. The financial impact of implementing such a program is unknown at this time. Although the individual refund amount under the current fee structure would only amount to $34.50 a year (30 percent of the current annual SFR rate), or $2.88 per month, the broad base of homeowners qualifying for refunds could be great. The SFR rate may have to be increased even further down the road to absorb the loss in revenues resulting from refunds. Also, such a program would probably generate a substantial increase in the number of refund claims submitted, requiring additional staffing resources. In addition, many, if not most of the same refunds would be generated annually since the user fee on the property tax bill would not change. Due to the relatively small inequities amongst all single -family residences, staff believes the additional costs to implement, monitor and administer a low-income or low-usage program out weighs the positive benefits to be derived. MW H:\dept\fin\210\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR2005\APR\Staff Report_Proposed Nan-Resid SSF Rate Adj 05-06.doc FAHR COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. 04/13/05 04/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR05-30 14(0 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: SELECTION OF THE DISTRICT'S INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL AUDITORS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a consulting service agreement for External Financial Auditing Services, Specification No. CS-2005-217, with Conrad & Associates for a five-year period beginning with the audit of the financial statements for FY 2004-05, at the following maximum annual fees: FY Year FY of Auditing Maximum Being Audited Services Contract Annual Fees FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 $46,550 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 47,795 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 49,040 FY 2007-08 FY 2008-09 50,315 FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 51,590 SUMMARY Moreland & Associates has served as the District's auditors for the past 10 years. At the direction of the Committee. staff solicited a Request For Proposal For Professional Auditing Services (RFP) for fiscal year 2004-05, with the option of auditing the following four years at the discretion of the Committee. The RFP was submitted to the following firms: Caporicci & Larson Conrad & Associates Deloitte & Touche Diehl. Evans & Co. Ernst & Young Charles Z. Fedek, & Co. Lance. Soll & Lunghard McGladrey & Pullen PriceWaterhouseCoopers Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott Teaman, Ramirez & Smith, Inc. Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co. Six responses were received. An Evaluation Team comprised of the Controller, Accounting Supervisor, and Principal Accountant, all CPA's with prior public governmental auditing experience, was established and performed a preliminary evaluation ranking on these six proposals. Listed below are the results of the H\depMgenda\Board Agenda Reporls1P005 Board Agenda&Agenda Reports10405\Item 14(t)Independenl Audtors doc Revised 1,5/98 Page 1 1 preliminary evaluation in the order of the ranking done by staff, followed by the first year maximum fee quoted in their proposals, and then by estimated audit hours: Initial Evaluation Maximum Estimated Ranking By Staff Fee — 1St Yr. Audit Hours Conrad & Associates 1 $46,550 460 Diehl, Evans & Co. 2 46,500 490 Lance, Soll & Lunghard 3 47,660 492 Rogers, Anderson, Malody& Scott 4 45.400 500 Charles Z. Fedek, & Co. 5 61.500 641 McGladrey & Pullen 6 75.000 645 The initial evaluation performed by staff was done in accordance with the criteria set forth in the RFP, without consideration of fees, as follows: 1. Qualifications of the Firm 2. Staffing and Project Organization 3. Work Plan Based on the initial screening, a second Evaluation Team was formed with the same members as the first except for Director Roy Moore replacing the Principal Accountant. The second Evaluation Team interviewed the top two firms who had clearly distinguished themselves from the others based on the quality of their proposals: Conrad & Associates Diehl, Evans, & Co. Each of these two finalists is qualified to serve as the District's auditors. However, Conrad & Associates became the preferred choice by the Evaluation Team based on: • Assignment of Ken AI-Imam as the audit engagement partner. Mr. AI-Imam has over 20 years experience in governmental financial audits and is past Chairman of the State Governmental Accounting and Auditing Committee of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants. • The audit team proposed by Conrad & Associates, the Engagement Manager, Technically Review Partner, Audit Manager, and Senior- In-Charge, had the most experience with auditing large water and wastewater special districts. • Conrad & Associates' maximum annual fees were the third lowest, but within 2.5 percent of the lowest proposed fees. H 1dept\agendMBoard Agenda Reports\2005 Board Agenda&Agenda Reports\0405\Item 14(f)Independent Auditors doc Revised 1/5198 Page 2 Therefore, the Selection Committee recommends appointment of Conrad & Associates to provide audit services beginning with the year ending June 30, 2005. As requested in the RFP, Conrad &Associates also submitted their proposed maximum fees for the succeeding four years, as follows: 2005-06 $47,795 2006-07 49,040 2007-08 50,315 2008-09 51,590 PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS None. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY A maximum of$46,550 for FY 2004-05 audit. BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ® This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) The fees for the FY 2004-05 audit will be included in the FY 2005-06 Proposed Operating Budget. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS None WdeptlagendalBoard Agenda ReporlsQD05 Board Agenda&Agenda Reports1040511tem 14(f),Independent Auditors.doc Revised 1/5/98 Page 3 FA H R COMMITTEE Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 04/13/05 04/27/05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR05-29 14(g) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: 2005-06 SEWER SERVICE USER FEE ESTIMATES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ordinance No. OCSD-26, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Establishing Sanitary Sewer Service Charges; Establishing Capital Facilities Capacity Charges; Adopting Miscellaneous Charges and Fees Relating to Industrial Charges, Source Control Permittees and Wastehaulers, and Repealing Ordinance No. OCSD-24: Adopting Revised Table B re Property Use Classifications for Commercial or Industrial Users, and Revised Table E re Administrative Fees and Charges Relating to Permit tees, and Reaffirming All Other Charges a. Motion to read Ordinance No. OCSD-26 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance. (The waiver of the reading of the entire ordinance must be adopted by a unanimous vote of Directors present.) b. Motion to introduce Ordinance No. OCSD-26, and pass to second reading and public hearing on May 25, 2005. SUMMARY Historically, the District has increased our overall sewer user fees in fairly small annual increments, using some debt financing to smooth the impact of the capital improvement program. With the public interest in improved effluent quality and the Board's decision to meet secondary treatment discharge standards rapidly, it is appropriate to evaluate larger rate increases on the front-end of the capital improvement program in order to match the requirements of the program itself and to reduce the long-term rate impacts of additional future debt financing and interest costs. The capital program is summarized in an attached graphic. The Directors adopted a plan in 2003 that included debt financing for $1.4 billion of the $2.8 billion capital improvement and rehabilitation, refurbishment and replacement program. By authorizing this amount of borrowing. the Directors were able to limit projected annual sewer user fee increases to approximately 15% (approximately $18 per year) each year through 2007-08. The Board agreed with this plan and asked that the proposed fee increases be considered annually by the Board for implementation. 2005-06 will be the third year of this 5-year plan. A few things have changed since the adoption of the plan and of the 2003-04 budgets. We have again re-evaluated every project in the Validated Capital Improvement Program and many newly proposed projects as a part of the 2005-06 budget preparation process. At this point of the current year, the capital improvement program projections indicate that approximately $26 million of budgeted construction costs for this year will be deferred to a future year. We have evaluated the computer model that projects long-term needs for facility rehabilitation, refurbishment and replacement. We have also reviewed our operations and maintenance projections used in our cash flow models. The cumulative result of all of these efforts is an increased cash flow requirement. This increase, as well as good planning principles, has caused staff to evaluate alternative user fee schedules. The attached staff report includes four cash flow alternatives ranging from continuing the current practice to significant fee increases in the next few years. There are good reasons to pick each of the alternatives presented. After considering the immediate impact on our constituents, the long-term consequences of increased debt financing, the SWRCB and EPA requirement that we meet secondary discharge standards in 2012, and the political and economic environment. staff recommends adoption of a 2005-06 sanitary sewer user fee schedule based upon a Single-Family Residential rate of $132.00 per year; a $17.00 per year increase. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Without a Board action (by 2/3 majority). the SFR rate for 2005-06 will remain at $115.00 per year. The $132 rate recommended for 2005-06 will generate approximately $117 million of user fees; an annual increase of $15 million. There are no extraordinary costs associated with the recommendation. BUDGET IMPACT This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item). Applies to future budget periods ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The attached staff report contains additional information, as well as charts and cash flow projections that reveal the long-term ramifications for four alternatives. ALTERNATIVES The attached staff report contains additional information as well as charts and cash flow projections that reveal the long-term ramifications for four alternatives. H\dept\agenda\Board Agenda ReportWD05 Board Agenda 8 Agenda Reports\0405\Ilem 14(g)Ordinance 26.doc Revised M04/03 Page 2 Y CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Capital Improvement & Rehabilitation, Refurbishment, Replacement Program 2. Staff report GGSAc H:tdephagenda%Board Agenda Reports12005 Board Agenda&Agenda Reports*405111em 14(g).Ordinance 26.doc Revised: 06104103 Page 3 4/4/2005 Capital Improvement & Rehabilitation Program $450,000,000 $400,000,000 — $350,0001000 - - $300,000,000 — c $250,000,000 Cr d $200,000,000 c Q $150,000,000 Validated Projected Rehab, Repl & $100,000,000 $50,000,000 $0 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 H:\dept\fin\210\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR2005\APR\Attachment 1_Agenda Report Re SewerFees xls NZ SAN1T 1 � m 0 ♦ ��DC) or Yg TN April 2, 2005 STAFF REPORT Annual Sewer Service User Fee Alternatives BACKGROUND Portions of the District have been collecting an annual sewer service user fee as a separate line item on the property tax bill since 1982. The current fee of$115 was adopted for one year in accordance with the Board's stated desire to review the needs and the options annually. Because these fees are collected on the property tax bill and adopted by the Ordinance process that requires two Board meetings and a public hearing, they are reviewed in April to be effective on July 1. During the current 2004-05 fiscal year, we expect to receive about $101.5 million of sewer service user fees. An additional $5.1 million is expected to be received from our Permit Users. These fees are used for operational and maintenance needs in the collection system and in the treatment plants as well as for a portion of the capital improvement program and for principal and interest payments on certificates of participation (COPs) that exceeds our share of the property tax allocation. The Directors have control over the user fee rates as well as the structure of the assessment program. The current structure was adopted subsequent to an extensive public outreach, participation and consultation program as a part of the 1999 Strategic Plan process. This structure charges every parcel in our service area based upon the size of the building and the use of building on that parcel. The County Assessor's database is the initial source of property data, although we have modified our copy based upon our experience, and we pay a fee for the use of that data and for updates. Sewer service user fees are specifically exempted from some of the requirements of Proposition 218. Most notably, they are exempt from the election requirements, but not the requirement that fees cannot exceed the reasonable cost of service. The Board has agreed with staff, however, that we will comply with all of the rest of the requirements, in a spirit of good governance. A notice of rate changes is mailed to every property owner whenever the rates are proposed to increase. In 2003, the District notified all property owners of a plan to increase rates annually through 2007-08. Subsequent to that notification, the Board voted to authorize rate increases for only the following year in both 2003 and 2004. No additional notification is required unless the Board desires to increase rates beyond those in the original notification. Because that notification included the proposed rates for each year, the Board would be allowed to increase rates to the rate that was "noticed"even though the prior increases were not authorized in their entirety. OCSD 0 F.O.Box 8127 ❑ Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 0 (714)962-2411 Annual Sewer Service User Fee Alternatives Page 2of4 April 2, 2005 Typically we refer to the annual single-family residential (SFR) rate as the benchmark for the user fees. Separate rates are charged for multi-family residential (MFR) units, and the rates for non-residential users are various percentages of the SFR rate depending upon the type of use of the property. Rates are also adopted for approximately 500 permit users at this same time. This requires individual rates for flow, BOD and SS as these users are billed based upon their actual discharge to the sewer. These Permit Users receive a credit against this actual charge for the share of their 1% property tax that is allocated to the District. OVERVIEW Historically, the District has increased the overall sewer user fees in fairly small increments, using debt financing to smooth the impact of the capital improvement program. Rates have been adopted for periods ranging from one year to as long as ten years. Most recently, the Board has preferred to review and to adopt rates each year. With the public interest in improved effluent quality and the Board's decision to meet secondary treatment discharge standards by 2012, now may be an appropriate time to change from a constant rate of increase to a plan that increases the rates more on the front-end of the capital improvement program, in order to match the program itself and to reduce the long-term impacts of debt financing or interest costs. Increasing user fees more quickly and reducing borrowing can be shown to reduce the total overall costs to the District and the total fees paid by users over the long term. The cost of this reduced borrowing is higher fees in the immediate future. Each year staff reviews the approved capital improvement plan from the prior year through the 2020 planning period. During this review, we evaluate every approved project to determine if it is still necessary, if the timing is appropriate, and if the projected costs are reasonable. Our overriding concern is that we comply with the Board's direction, and the terms of our discharge permit; to meet secondary treatment standards by 2012 while providing for increased flows and rehabilitation and refurbishment of existing facilities. Over the next seven years, the CIP cash flow needs will be $2.1 billion; an annual average of nearly $300 million. Subsequent to completing the facilities needed to meet secondary treatment discharge requirements, the program needs are currently projected to decline to an average of $197 million per year, including rehabilitation, refurbishment and replacement needs. A graphical representation of the capital program needs attached. This report presents alternatives ranging from nearly 24% to 52% debt financing for the entire capital program over the 2020 planning period. ALTERNATIVE DISCUSSION Cash flow projections were completed for 4 user fee increase scenarios. Each of these projections used the same capital improvement program, the same property tax growth, the same operations & maintenance costs, etc. The only changes were the rates of the annual increase in sewer user fees, and the amount of borrowing. Of course these variables cause the interest income and the annual debt service expense to vary by alternative. Annual Sewer Service User Fee Alternatives Page 3 of 4 April 2, 2005 For purposes of the model, rates were never decreased. In some cases this restriction resulted in very large cash and investment balances at the end of the planning period. If this were to happen, staff would expect to either reduce the rates or to retire some of the outstanding debt. These decisions will need to be made when and if those balances materialize, but are not reflected in the presentation in order to reduce the number of variables being compared. A graphical comparison of the annual SFR rates and another of the COP principal outstanding at the end of each fiscal year is attached as an overview of the different alternatives. An individual cash flow projection is also provided to show the details of each of the 4 alternatives. 15% 2003 Policy In most recent years, the annual sewer user fee has increased by 15% or less per year. Last year this amounted to a $15 per year increase. This historical rate of increase is reflected in the first alternative. This is the lowest initial increase and results in the most new borrowing. In the first 7 years, the annual SFR rate increases from $115.00 to $306.00. Rates continue to increase through 2019-20 when they reach $510.00. These rates are shown on line 19 of the cash flow. Line 20b of the cash flow shows the 2005 equivalent of these rates assuming a 5% annual inflation rate. The total amount of fees paid by an SFR would be $5,271.00 and there would be $716 of reserves per equivalent dwelling unit at 2020. New certificates of participation amounting to $1.94 billion would be required to fund the$3.72 billion capital improvement and refurbishment program. The maximum amount of debt outstanding is $2.26 billion in 2012-13. 20% Initial Rate Increases A 20% initial rate increase is the next cash flow presented. Annual 20% increases are projected each of the next 5 years, through 2009-10. At that time the annual SFR rate would be$285.00. Ten percent annual increases, to $380.00, are projected through 2012-13. In 2019-20 the annual SFR rate would be $486.00. The total amount of fees paid by an SFR would be $5,396.50, and there would be $667 of reserves per equivalent dwelling unit at 2020. New certificates of participation amounting to $1.6 billion are issued to fund the $3.72 billion capital improvement and refurbishment program. The maximum amount of debt outstanding is $1.98 billion in 2012-13. 218 Noticed Rate Increases The 2003 notice that was mailed to every property owner/user in accordance with Proposition 218 projected rates through 2007-08. It is permissible to increase rates in 2005-06 up to the rate that was projected in that notice. Of course the notice governs the subsequent maximum increases in 2006-07 and 2007-08. The third cash flow presentation incorporated the rates as noticed. This would be the equivalent of a 31% increase for 2005-06, followed by 20% increases the next two years. A new notice would be required in 2008-09 for this and the previous two alternatives. The projected rate in 2012-13 would be $375.00 per year and it would be $479.00 per year in 2020. The total fees paid by an SFR through 2020 would be $5,398.00, and there would be $653 of reserves per equivalent dwelling unit at 2020. New certificates of participation amounting to $1.5 billion are issued to fund the $3.72 billion capital Annual Sewer Service User Fee Alternatives Page 4 of 4 April 2, 2005 improvement and refurbishment program. The maximum amount of debt outstanding is $1.92 billion in 2012-13. The results of this alternative are very similar to the 20% Initial Increase alternative. State Average Rate Start Finally, the rapid rate of increase scenario that the Committee has heard suggested at several meetings presented. In this alternative rates are increased to the California average in 2006-07. 2006-07 is proposed as this increase would require a 218 notice process and that cannot be completed in time for the 2005-06 rate adoption process. (The rate proposed for 2005-06 is the rate from the 218 Noticed alternative, above.) The California average rate that is used in the analysis is taken from the 2004 California Wastewater Charge Survey published by Black & Veatch Corp, an independent engineering and consulting company. A different rate could be used on a more recent survey by the time the 2006-07 rates must be adopted. This scenario, then, proposes an initial increase of 31%just as above. However, the second year increase, for 2006-07, would be 71%. These two increases would be followed by 3 years of 10% increases which would be followed by increases that are equal to or less than inflation. The rate in 2012-13 would be $397.00 and the 2019-20 rate would be $430.00. The total fees paid by an SFR through 2020 would be $5,568.00, and there would be $563 of reserves per equivalent dwelling unit at 2020. New certificates of participation amounting to$900 million are issued to fund the $3.72 billion capital improvement and refurbishment program. The maximum amount of debt outstanding is $1.39 billion in 2010-11. This alternative results in the lowest amount of new debt and the lowest SFR rate in 2019-20. GGS HAdootlfin12101CRANEIFAHRIFAHR20051APR�5taff Report user fees - 5.doc Attachments: 1. SFR Annual User Fee Projection Graph 2. Outstanding COPs at Year End Graph 3. Minimal Rate Increases- 2003 Policy Cash Flow 4. Initial 20% Rate Increase Cash Flow 5. 218 Noticed Rates Cash Flow 6. Increased to State Average Cash Flow 4/4/2005 SFR Annual User Fee Projection $600 $500 ;--- - — $400 — - - - -- -- — , - - i r State Average Start LL $300 e c a � 218 Noticed tarter 2003"Policy" 15% $200 20% Increases $100 $0 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 H:ldept1fln12101CRANE%FAHR%FAHR200SAPR%Attachment 1_SewerFee.xls' 4/4/2005 Outstanding COPs @ Year End $2.300.000,000 — 2003"Policy" 15°� $2,100,000,000 20% Increases $1,900.000,000 /M ............... $1,700,000.000 4— 218 Noticed Start $1,500,000,000 -3� $1,300,000.000 State Average Start $1,100,000,000 $900,000.000 $700,000,000 $500,000,000 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 H,Weprifln12101CRANE%FAHR%FAHR20051APR%Ariachment 2_SewerFee.xls _ ,�YU 5j N+oQSg�9tEli� D RI +��Lim 9y P � P a aUN+O$0jy� P..PP.FYN+j�� i x �i3�Yi m!6ffim d ti � �"'`� 7 � YiP � bbm 8 61'�GS �ffiXo ! o . M g a P b V V V V O D D O S 9 38 8 M a _2 � gsQt9� s a 9 g 99999999 SO a Qa aaPy G15 � ABU Im ,mom� s�y8�mm $ m o -_ il �� wig w a w Ot all g o Cd BS u �od�N 'CS'0 zi; a II I I I I gig N g �P tea &� �aS _a n 000 VVV V `R N IV Qy! pp� ��yq�. • ��J p@�� pp��.{o��mm� � �g�V � '� yQ� $� $N� � C�1 � ��m�=��8��= ��! !1 �R�m4 aeL•2�:i� tl m@I W.m � �( " $� �! �N �m � �Qj ��p m�l�� oN O�mp� M a 'R V�3 �G��O m� � •1 � N R �a �m ~ �'l N tV O� ��C� N N d�R spa 99 — — m o IV i8s m6A� 8K $ � mm N m M $ � o 83 te ul r 8r m as RM N gj ,p m::FA 'm�nu^�� a M a m 3 M m 6 Qp y5�p pp Qps Q q p �t y QQ Qg r �n��7p5 pqa 2S 7oQ52f$� 27 Zf aa21 a 81 �y$y� a myg ern Sc� mm� � m�n � 75n4 �a2SN �N pQo f<m�, �Ny-�,%E yy� �Oml pN R MmyY/EO tl m1�1 n 6 N a -N�•!Q NOnq 9F;:V vz! V m :: m 0 mo 4'R F. N A N N N"ARR;9 91ai E q�j» 8�Pi oAn86 3 - q Sea w=Rl vs lea A g- UP o Q g C E � zc�af�w 19 8R �i itl6 8 rZ`° 8 $ $ pI ppg sppz A.p�xQ a h RUP r e a �y �p pR pA qA QQ Q p 99 Q 5� Q Q A Q Hq g Q Q p $�f�y AQ pR @�m� 2525 752525 2S $ el ��g W 8�$$�S 2f F7 252QY 2S� 2f 2$2f�, NN yNl 33 7f (Y_ 1 n np $9 VE gm �''r1 0 v A Ly H�9S m^n v`i� 1.0 A < _N ,.Hm^o — Oa�R� R A rv%3AnY3a�3n.! AA e 5 _6 ARK 9A99ms 9 R a Q » » 999 9 999999 9 � �Q9 A�A� �9X$'E �• � 6 � $ � FAQ^ 36�a a 999 9999 99999 9 _ g $ R&W&M 88 g �&Rz $y e QM a A6g� $ '» M 3m-Q 11 -1 9 p � Q XN Aa " 99 9 Q rn �s MO MR d a b Mf W b'F 99 Aix 9 �" i�9 ' » o� - 99999999 99 999 9 99 9 am 9 9 9999 ' §999 q 9959299S9t99 99 99�9t 9 99 9 » 99999999 99 999 9 99 9 e$ � 9 9 9 9999 ' 9994 »� s.�(9p� 9Q�py9 ��egm_99 � mg 9 Amy „ _ a�NZ9 99999999 99 999 9 99 9 a8R9 9 9 999 ' 999� �� » 99599�9j99� p1p9 999 9 $99 F p9 e�g��j9 9 9 � �99gg99g9� mm �$Qi: GS Rma 4 $ o J! �Nvi� 'N" 993c 990 999999 9 99 9 9 9 9 9 9 e $a 9M ' M9 �Nneam a m9::AA �flN S1 P 5�918ryAfB$1'nf1 R� ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-26 ADOPTING REVISED TABLE B RE PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS, AND REVISED TABLE E RE ADMINISTRATIVE FEES AND CHARGES RELATING TO PERMITEES, AND REAFFIRMING ALL OTHER CHARGES AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES; ESTABLISHING CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES; ADOPTING MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES AND FEES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL CHARGES, SOURCE CONTROL PERMITTEES AND WASTEHAULERS; AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. OCSD-24. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District ("District") has previously adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-24, establishing annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for all uses, establishing Capital Facilities Capacity Charges to be imposed when properties either newly-connect to the District's system, or expand the use of the property previously connected to the District; establishing miscellaneous industrial discharger fees, source control/non-compliance sampling fees, and wastehauler charges, which Ordinance is presently in full force and effect; and WHEREAS, for purposes of improved efficiency and effectiveness of the District's operations, it is the intent, by the adoption of this Ordinance, to re-enact the existing Ordinance that establishes sanitary sewer service charges and capital facilities fees, and to provide for increases in certain miscellaneous charges and fees. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District does hereby ORDAIN: Section I. Fees and Charges Ordinance —Adopted TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I: RECITAL OF FINDINGS Section 1.01, Findings — Declaration of Intent ARTICLE II: SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES Section 2.01, Purpose and Scope Section 2.02, Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 1 Section 2.03 A. Exemptions B. Application for Rebate C. Application for Refund D. Limitation Period E. Determination F. Administrative Fee Section 2.04, Annual Charge Based on Fiscal Year Section 2.05, Method of Collection Section 2.06, Credit for Industrial Permittees Table A Annual Sewer Service Charges for Residential Users Table B Annual Sewer Service Charges Property Use Classifications for Commercial or Industrial Users ARTICLE III: CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Section 3.01, Purpose and Scope Section 3.02, Definitions Section 3.03, Connection Permits: Required Section 3.04, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Payment Section 3.05, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Time of Payment Section 3.06, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Schedule of Amounts Section 3.07, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Significant Commercial — Industrial Users— Special Purpose Dischargers — Definitions Section 3.08, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Significant Commercial — Industrial Users Section 3.09, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Special Purpose Dischargers Section 3.10, Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Existing Significant Commercial — Industrial Users — Special Purpose Dischargers Table C Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Section 3.11, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Replacement Section 3.12, Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Remodeled Section 3.13, Payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Off-Site Sewers Not Part of Master Plan Relative to Reimbursement Agreements WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 2 Section 3.14, No Refund or Transfer Section 3.15, Baseline Transferability Table D Capital Facilities Capacity Charges ARTICLE IV: MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES AND FEES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGERS, SOURCE CONTROL PERMITTEES AND WASTEHAULERS Section 4.01, Purpose and Scope Section 4.02, Administrative Fees and Charges Relating to Permittees Section 4.03, Industrial Discharger, Source Control, and Non-Compliance Sampling Fees Section 4.04, Special Purpose Discharge Permittees; Charges for Use Section 4.05, Class I and Class II Permittees—Charges for Use Section 4.06, Wastehauler Charges for Use Section 4.07, Administrative Appeals Table E Administrative Fees and Charges Relating To Permittees Table F Industrial Discharger, Source Control and Non-Compliance Sampling Fees Table G Class I and Class II Permittees and Special Purpose Discharge Permittees Charges For Use Table H Wastehauler Charges for Use ARTICLE V: MISCELLANEOUS Section 5.01, Application of Ordinance Section 5.02, Exceptions Section 5.03, Severability Section 5.04, Effective Date Section 5.05, Repeal Section 5.06, Certification and Publication ARTICLE I RECITAL OF FINDINGS Section 1.01. Findings— Declaration of Intent. The Board of Directors of District has previously adopted Master Plans, as more particularly described in Findings B, C, D, and E below, setting forth the financial and engineering needs of the District, and hereby adopts the following Findings supporting the amounts of charges and fees adopted pursuant to this Ordinance. WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04120/05 3 A. That the former County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California (the "Predecessor Districts"), were nine individual County Sanitation Districts, organized pursuant to the County Sanitation District Act (California Health & Safety Code Section 4700 et seq.). By action of the Board of Directors of the Predecessor Districts, pursuant to specific legislation enacted by the California State Legislature in 1996, an application was submitted to the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission to legally consolidate the nine Predecessor Districts into one single Sanitation District for all purposes. The application was approved, with an effective date of July 1, 1998. As of July 1, 1998, the Predecessor Districts ceased to exist, and one single consolidated County Sanitation District, known as the Orange County Sanitation District, came into existence in place of the Predecessor Districts. The District was formed to carry on the functions of the Predecessor Districts. B. That a comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities, entitled "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan — 1989", hereinafter referred to as the "Master Plan", which includes detailed financial and engineering reports, was prepared, approved, and adopted by the Boards of Directors of the Predecessor Districts in 1989, setting forth and identifying the required future development of District Facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to all properties within the individual service areas of each of the nine Predecessor Districts. C. That the financial and engineering reports of the Master Plan were made available to the public, both prior to and subsequent to the adoption of the Master Plan, and were subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of the California Constitution and Government Code Section 66016, and other provisions of law. D. That the District, in 1997, as part of its maintenance and updating of its Master Plan, undertook a comprehensive evaluation and study of its operational and financial needs for the next 20 years, including a detailed assessment of all types and categories of users; the demands on the system and capacity needs of the system to provide necessary service to the multiple categories of users; the total costs of the existing and future facilities in the system; and alternate methodologies for establishing fair and equitable charges to connect to and gain access to the system. These comprehensive planning, engineering, and financial studies led to the development of an updated Comprehensive Master Plan of Capital Facilities, which was approved and adopted by OCSD Resolution No. 99-21 of the Board of Directors on October 27, 1999. E. That in support of this Ordinance and the revised charges for sewer service and/or Capital Facilities Capacity Charges as provided for on Tables A, C, D and G herein, the Board of Directors finds that the Capital Improvement Program ("CIP") Validation Study for Fiscal year 2003-04 and the WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 4 Secondary Treatment Peer Review, as approved by the Board of Directors, has resulted in the development of a Capital Improvement Program that provides for the implementation of secondary treatment standards, thereby improving effluent quality in a reasonably short period of time, consistent with the goals and policies of the Board of Directors, the member agencies, and the public, while also providing for the construction of necessary improvements to accommodate projected increased flows and the rehabilitation and refurbishment of existing facilities. The Board further finds that programming annual adjustments in sewer service charges over a period of years is appropriate and ensures adequate revenues to finance the improvements and programs necessary to implement secondary treatment standards, accommodate increased flows, rehabilitate and refurbish existing facilities, and retire any necessary or prudent debt incurred to finance such improvements in a reasonable manner and over a reasonable period of time. The Board of Directors also finds that such Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Capital Facilities Capacity Charges are reasonably related to, and do not exceed the cost of providing sewer services. F. That the financial requirements of the District, as shown in reports prepared by Staff and Consultants relating to the Strategic Plan and the CIP validation studies, are based on current, reliable information and data relating to population projections, wastewater flow, and capital facilities' needs, and are expected to be realized in each year as described in the reports. G. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the sewage collection, wastewater treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; to repay federal and state loans issued for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves; and to assist in the payment of costs to the District to provide all regulatory administration and laboratory services related to the industrial dischargers, source control permittees, and wastehauler users of the District's systems. H. That the owners or occupants of properties upon which all fees and charges established by this Ordinance are levied, discharge wastewater to the District's collection, treatment and disposal facilities. The costs of operating and maintaining said facilities have constantly increased due in part to increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process. I. That the need for upgraded and improved treatment of all wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities is required to protect the public health and safety, and to preserve the environment without damage. J. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established and levied by this Ordinance are to allow the District to recover the reasonable costs WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 5 c to provide a service to individual properties which have been improved for any of numerous types of uses. The basis for the respective charge is the request of the owner of property or a structure thereon, for the benefit of him/her/itself, or the occupants of the property, to receive a service based upon actual use, consumption, and disposal of water to the District's system in lieu of disposal by other means. K. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established by this Ordinance are not imposed as a condition of approval of a development project, as defined in California Government Code Section 66001, and do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to provide the sewer service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Government Code Sections 66013 and 66016 and California Constitution Article XIIID. L. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges adopted herein will not necessarily result in an expansion of facilities to provide for growth outside the existing service area. The adoption of these Sanitary Sewer Service Charges will not result in any specific project, nor result in a direct physical change in the environment. M. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges adopted herein are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each customer and the service and facilities provided to each customer of the District, a portion of which are necessary to replace the loss of ad valorem property taxes to the State General Fund as a result of state legislative action on September 2, 1992, and in subsequent years. N. That the Board of Directors has previously, by duly adopted Ordinances, commencing in 1969, and most recently by Ordinance No. OCSD- 24, established Capital Facilities Capacity Charges, formerly known commonly as "connection charges" or"fees", to be paid by all persons obtaining a permit to connect to the District's system. Said Charges are required as a financial payment to have access to and use of the District's wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities in existence at the time of connecting to the system, and for future facilities to be constructed. O. That the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Capital Facilities Capacity Charges established here, are an incident but not a condition of development, payable only on request to receive service by the property owner for the benefit of those persons on the property that use the service. The charges are not an incident of property ownership, nor are they a property- related service having a direct relationship to property ownership. Accordingly, the provisions of California Constitution Article XIIID are not applicable. P. That the District's previous and present Capital Facilities Capacity Charges Ordinances, include[d] authority for the District to levy an WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 6 excess or supplemental capacity charge upon commercial and industrial users who discharge quantities or high strength wastewater greater than the established base line of authorized discharge. Q. That the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges re-enacted by this Ordinance are non-discriminatory, as applied to all users of the system, and are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each category of property that is connecting, and the service and facilities provided to each connected property or structure, by the District, within a given category. R. That the miscellaneous charges and fees re-enacted by this Ordinance without change are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged to each industrial discharger, source control permittee, or wastehauler and the service and facilities provided to each. S. That the District is required by federal and state law, including the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251, et seq.), the General Pretreatment Regulations (40 C.F.R. 403), and the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (California Water Code Sections 13000 et seq.) to implement and enforce a program for the regulation of wastewater discharges to the District's sewers. T. That the District is required by federal, state and local law, to meet applicable standards of treatment plant effluent quality. U. That pursuant to these requirements, the Board of Directors has adopted Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations. V. That the District incurs additional costs in conducting non- compliance sampling of those industrial wastewater dischargers who violate the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations and in administering the industrial, wastehauler, and special discharge permit programs. W. That Ordinance No OCSD-01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations, provides that the Board of Directors is to establish various fees and charges to recover those costs to the District which are made necessary by industrial dischargers and wastehaulers who violate the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations. X. That the industrial discharger, source control, and wastehauler fees and charges hereby established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs to the District of industrial discharger, source control, or wastehauler use of the District's facilities and for the administration and implementation of permit and fee processing, non-compliance WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 7 sampling, and related services associated with the District's Source Control Program. Y. That all fees and charges established herein have been approved by the District's Board of Directors at a noticed public meeting, all in accordance with applicable provisions of law. Z. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the provisions of Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). AA. That each of the Findings set forth in previous Ordinances Nos. OCSD-05, OCSD-06, OCSD-11, OCSD-13, OCSD-15, OCSD-18, OCSD-19, OCSD-20, OCSD-22, and OCSD-24 are reaffirmed and readopted hereat, except to the extent that they have been specifically superseded or otherwise amended by specific Findings herein. ARTICLE II SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES Section 2.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish Sanitary Sewer Service Charges required to be paid by property owners for the services and facilities furnished by the District in connection with its sanitation treatment works and sewage collection system. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal and state loans issued for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. Section 2.02. Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge. Commencing with the effective date of this Ordinance, the owner of each parcel of real property located within the District which is improved with structures designed for residential, commercial, or industrial use and which, at the request of the owner or the owner's predecessor-in-interest, is connected to the District's system, shall pay an annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge based on the respective class of users, in the sum or sums, as set forth in Tables A and B of this Ordinance, below. The annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for residential users are set forth in Table A. The applicable single family residential rate shown in Table A is multiplied by the applicable percentage figure shown on Table B with respect to the particular use classification to arrive at the annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge rate per 1,000 square feet for the commercial or industrial user. The annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 8 commercial or industrial users are dependent upon the respective classifications of property use, determined by reference to Table B. Section 2.03. A. Exemptions. It is the intent of the District that the legal owner(s) of parcels of real property, otherwise subject to the levy and payment of the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges, as prescribed herein, be relieved, in whole or in part, from the payment of said charges, in certain circumstances and under conditions prescribed herein, and be entitled to either a rebate or a refund with respect to charges paid, as more specifically set forth in Subparagraphs 2.03B and 2.03C below, provided an inequity is established or a billing error is proven, as specified in Subparagraphs B or C. B. Application for Rebate. Any property owner may apply to the District for a rebate of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges paid to the District by establishing that an unfair valuation of the property has been made by the District. An applicant for a rebate must establish, by proof satisfactory to the General Manager of the District, or his designee, that an inequity exists between the amount of the charge paid and the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system, resulting in an unfair valuation. Satisfactory proof shall establish that either: (1) The principal water use is agricultural or horticultural; or (2) The property is devoted to any other use wherein the amount of wastewater discharged to the District's system is significantly less on a regular basis than the amount that would normally be expected to be discharged by the class of property in question. Satisfactory proof shall include, but not be limited to, documentation showing actual water usage for each billing cycle during the entire period for which the rebate is sought. The amount of any rebate shall not reduce the charge payable by any property owner, whose property is connected to the District's system, to less than the single family residential charge shown on the applicable Table attached hereto. C. Application for Refund. Any property owner may apply to the District for a refund of Sanitary Sewer Service Charges paid to the District by establishing that the amount paid was pursuant to an error in the amount billed or the amount paid. The applicant for a refund must submit proof satisfactory to the General Manager of the District, or his designee, that a billing error has been made by the District, or the County Tax Collector. Such proof shall include, but not be limited to, proof that: WS&S-SRH:pj:201660:04120/05 9 (1) The owner's parcel of property is not connected to the District's system; or (2) The property has not been classified in the proper land use category; or (3) A clerical error has been made. D. Limitations Period. Applications for rebates and refunds shall be deemed to be governed by the provisions of California Revenue & Taxation Code Sections 5096 and 5097, allowing for refunds for a period of four (4) years from the date of payment of the second installment of the bill claimed to be either inequitable or incorrect. E. Determination. All applications for rebates or refunds of the Sanitary Sewer Service Charge will be determined by the General Manager of the District, or his designee, who, based on the submitted proof, may grant a full or partial rebate or refund. F. Administrative Fee. At the time of filing the application for rebate or refund, the property owner shall pay District an administrative fee for the processing of such application. The amount of the fee shall be equal to the total of all fees and charges imposed on the District by any other public entity, such as the Orange County Tax Collector, the Orange County Auditor, or the Orange County Recorder, in connection with the rebate or refund. Section 2.04. Annual Charge Based on Fiscal Year. The Sanitary Sewer Service Charges established by this Ordinance shall be effective as of July 1 of each year, as set forth in Tables A and B, attached hereto, for the District's fiscal year, and shall remain in effect until such time as the rates adopted herein are changed by District Ordinance. There shall be no proration of such charges in any fiscal year. Section 2.05. Method of Collection. A. Pursuant to the authority granted by California Health & Safety Code Section 5473, and except as otherwise provided in Subparagraph 2.05B below, all sanitary sewer service charges established herein shall be collected on the County Tax Roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with, and not separately from, its general taxes. The County Tax Collector is authorized and hereby ordered to make said collections in accordance with the terms and conditions of agreements between the County of Orange and the District. B. In the event District determines that, due to billing or payment error, or to inequity in the amount billed, a property owner has WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 10 underpaid annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges payable to District, District, within four (4) years after the date of mailing of the tax bill, may: (1) collect the amount of any deficiency directly on the County Tax Roll; (2) off-set the amount of any deficiency against any amounts that District determines is owing, by District, to the property owner, as a rebate or refund under this Ordinance; or (3) submit, directly to the property owner, a bill for the amount of any deficiency, which shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of the invoice date and which, if not paid, shall become a lien on said property. Section 2.06. Credit for Industrial Permittees. A credit shall be allowed to all dischargers permitted pursuant to Article 3 of District Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, in an amount equal to the annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge established by Section 2.02 of this Ordinance, in the same manner as credit is allowed for ad valorem taxes pursuant to Sections 302.6(B), and 303.6(B) of District Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended. TABLE A ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE USER FEES RESIDENTIAL USERS FISCAL YEAR 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 SFR $100.00 $115.00 $132.00 $153.00 $175.00 MFR $ 70.00 $ 80.50 $ 92.40 $107.10 $122.50 SFR = SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MFR = MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL All properties located within Revenue Area No. 14 pay no annual service fees. District costs relating to providing service to these properties are billed by OCSD directly to the Irvine Ranch Water District, the local agency providing the local sewer service. wS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 11 TABLE B ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit 1 Vacant Land Parcel 0% 5 Common Area Parcel 0% 6 "Hold" Parcel 0% 8 Equivalent to Vacant 0% 121 Parcel of Minimal or No Value 0% 122 Subsurface Parcels 0% 124 Oil/Mineral Rights 0% 125 Mineral Rights Equipment 0% 126 Vacant Comm. Area-IMP Alloc. 0% 201 Homeowners Exemption Add'I. 0% 666 Unassigned Vacant 0% 777 Septic Tank Property 0% 112 Steel Building 7% 113 Mini-Warehouse 7% 58 Nurseries (Plants) 10% 100 Drive-In Theater 10% 44 Lumber/Constr. Material Yard 17% 71 Parking Garage 17% 72 Paved Parking Lot 17% 110 Warehouse— Single Tenant 17% 111 Warehouse— Multi Tenant 17% 115 Recreational Vehicle Storage 17% 116 Truck Terminal 17% 33 Church Buildings 20% 94 Department Store 23% 95 Discount Store 23% 96 Unattached Single Store 23% 97 Strip Store 23% 74 Recreational Vehicle Park 27% 36 Financial Buildings 27% 40 Health Club 29% 68 High Rise Office 30% 21 Automobile Dealership 41% 22 Auto Repair Shop 41% 23 Automotive Service 41% 24 Used Car Lot 41% 39 Golf Course 41% 57 Motorcycle/Small Vehicle Building 41% 83 Automotive Service Station 41% wS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04120/05 12 TABLE B (CONTINUED) ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit 84 Marine Service Station 41% 86 Combin.-Service Station/Convenience 41% 65 Single Office Bldgs. to 3 Stories 41% 66 Small Office Center 41% 67 Office Complex 41% 69 Converted Residence to Office 41% 7 Mobile Home 50% 55 Mobile Home Park 50% 107 Light Industrial—Single Tenant 50% 108 Light Industrial—Multi Tenant 50% 109 Research and Development 50% 114 Industrial Park 50% 37 Fraternal Buildings 51% 101 Unattached Theater 51% 26 Airport and Related Buildings 53% 45 Marinas 53% 88 Low Flow Shopping Center 53% 3 Two or More Residences 70% 10 Duplex Only 70% 11 Triplex Only 70% 12 04-Units Only 70% 13 5 to 16 Units 70% 14 17 to 25 Units 70% 15 26 to 40 Units Only 70% 16 41-99 Units Only 70% 17 100 or More Units 70% 18 Developed with a Mix of Forms 70% 63 Low Rise Retirement Building 70% 64 High Rise Retirement Building 70% 56 Motels 70% 81 Pre-Schools, Nursery or Care 82% 82 Private Schools 82% 98 Store with Offices or Living Quarter 82% 99 Store with Office Upstairs 82% 118 Governmental Use Vacant/Develop. 82% 19 SFR with 1 or 2 rental units 85% 34 Dormitory 97% 42 Hospital 97% 43 Hotel 97% 0 Conversion-C/1, Rural PC 100% 2 One Residence 100% WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 13 TABLE B (CONTINUED) ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit 4 Miscellaneous Improvement 100% 85 Comb. Serv. Stn./Restaurant 100% 103 Chemical Tank and Bulk Storage 100% 104 Food Processing Plant 100% 105 Cold Storage Plant 100% 106 Factory 100% 119 Public Utility 100% 120 Water Mutual or Company 100% 888 Conversion-Composite Prop. 100% 32 Cemetery & Related Buildings 101% 38 Funeral Home 101% 60 Nursing Home 102% 61 Convalescent Hospitals 102% 62 Converted Res. Used as Nursing 102% 28 Bowling Alleys 112% 92 Skating Rinks 112% 50 Single Medical Bldgs. to 3 Stories 124% 51 Small Medical Center 124% 52 Medical Center Complex 124% 53 High Rise Medical 124% 54 Converted Residence to Medical 124% 89 Average Flow Shopping Center 139% 20 Amusement Parks 144% 35 Entertainment Center 144% 73 Recreation 144% 30 Coin Operated Car Wash 151% 47 Supermarket 151% 48 Convenience Market 151% 224 Nightclub 200% 90 High Flow Shopping Center 226% 76 Restaurant—Take Out 300% 77 Restaurant— Coffee Shop 600% 78 Restaurant— Dinner House 600% 79 Restaurant—Conversion from SF 600% 29 Conventional Car Wash 796% 223 Laundromat 1,800% NOTE: Multiply the Table A Single Family Residential Rate by the percentage figure above in order to determine the rate per 1,000 square feet for the commercial or industrial user. WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 14 ARTICLE III CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Section 3.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance is to impose Capital Facilities Capacity Charges when properties, either newly- connect to the District's system, or expand the use of the property previously connected to the District. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, and reconstruction of the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments; or to repay federal or state loans for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserves. Section 3.02. Definitions. A. "Actual construction costs" include the cost of all activities necessary or incidental to the construction of a District facility, such as financing, planning, designing, acquisition of the property or interests in the property, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and repair. B. "Capital Facilities Capacity Charge" means a one-time, non- discriminatory charge imposed at the time a building or structure is newly connected to the District's system, directly or indirectly, or an existing structure or category of use is expanded or increased. Said charge is to pay for District facilities in existence at the time the charge is imposed, or to pay for new facilities to be constructed in the future, that are of benefit to the property being charged. This charge does not apply to temporary facilities or operations that are regulated under the provisions of a Special Purpose Discharge Permit. C. "Connection fee" means a fee equal to the cost necessary to physically connect a property to the District's system, including but not limited to, installation of meters, meter boxes, pipelines, and appurtenances to make the connection and which fee does not exceed the actual cost of labor, materials, and overhead for the installation of those facilities. D. "Non-discriminatory" means that the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge does not exceed an amount determined on the basis of the same objective criteria and methodology applicable to comparable public or non- public users, and is not in excess of the proportionate share of the cost of the District's facilities of benefit to the person or property being charged, based upon the proportionate share of use of those facilities. E. "Public agency" means the United States or any of its agencies, the State or any of its agencies, the Regents of the University of WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04120/05 15 California, a county, city, district, school district, local or regional public authority, or any other political entity, subdivision or public corporation of the State. F. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as provided for in Sections 3.07, 3.08, 3.09, and 3.10 of this Ordinance, is an annual charge payable to the District on a quarterly or annual basis, as determined by the District. Said charge is required to be paid by dischargers that exceed the maximum quantity of flow or constituents (BOD or SS) allowed as a base use for which the CFCC is paid. Section 3.03. Connection Permits: Required. A. Connection permits are required of each and every dwelling unit, and each commercial or industrial building, and structure connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities. Included are the connections of laterals to local municipal sewerage facilities, and the connection of local municipal sewerage facilities and laterals to the District's facilities. Multiple detached structures on a single parcel of property shall each be required to obtain a connection permit. B. Except as authorized by the issuance of a Special Purpose Discharge Permit under Sections 305 — 305.6 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01, or as amended, or as authorized pursuant to a special extra territorial service agreement approved by the Board of Directors, no permit shall be valid unless the real property to be served by use of the permit is included within the boundaries of the District and within the boundaries of a local sewering agency authorized to maintain public sewering facilities. However, a permit, as authorized above, may be issued for property to be served outside the boundaries of a local sewering agency if a local sewering agency makes application for the issuance of such permit. There will be a non-discriminatory Capital Facilities Capacity Charge assessed to public agencies for connecting directly or indirectly to the District's sewerage system facilities, and a connection permit must be obtained. Section 3.04. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Payment Required. No application for a permit for a connection of a structure to a District sewerage facility, or to any sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility, shall be approved, nor a permit issued, until a District Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid by the applicant, except as provided for discharges under a Special Purpose Discharge Permit. No connection permit shall be issued unless there is an established category of use of the property to be served or a valid building permit issued which establishes the category of use of said property. WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 16 Section 3.05. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Time of Payment. A. Payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge established by this Ordinance for connection to the District's sewerage system facilities shall be required at the time of issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a permit. The payment of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such exempt buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District, or if none, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. B. Upon application of any property owner seeking to connect to the District's system, the Board of Directors of District, in its sole and absolute discretion and upon a finding of compelling need, may, pursuant to the authority of California Health & Safety Code Section 5474, approve of an agreement with the property owner for the payment of the applicable connection charge in installments over a period of not to exceed five (5) years, bearing an interest rate on the unpaid balance of not to exceed ten (10%) percent per annum, and that the charges and interest shall constitute a lien on the property. Section 3.06. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Schedule of Amounts. Every person or entity connecting any new or expanded building or structure to the District's system facilities shall pay a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge in the amount for the applicable category of use set forth on Table C, below. WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 17 TABLE C CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Use Category Rate Basis Base Charge Commercial — Industrial Per 1,000 square feet' Low Demand Per 1,000 square feet $ 170.001 Average Demand Per 1,000 square feet $1,050.00, High Demand Per 1,000 square feet $2,490.001 Single Family Residential (SFR) * % of Base Base Charge 5+ Bedrooms (Per Unit) 1.39 $4,020.00 4 Bedrooms (Per Unit) 1.19 $3,440.00 3 Bedrooms (Per Unit) 1.00 (Base) $2,890.00 2 Bedrooms (Per Unit) 0.81 $2,340.00 1 Bedroom (Per Unit) 0.62 $1,790.00 Multi-Family Residential (MFR) * % of Base Base Charge 4+ Bedrooms (Per Unit) 1.08 $3,120.00 3 Bedrooms (Per Unit) 0.89 $2,570.00 2 Bedrooms (Per Unit) 0.70 $2,020.00 1 Bedroom (Per Unit) 0.50 $1,450.00 Studio (Per Unit) 0.32 $ 920.00 Supplemental CFCC for Permit Users, includes 5% cost of funds. Flow, gallons per day $0.001001 BOD, pounds per day $0.289100 SS, pounds per day $0.187150 'Provided that the minimum Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for such new construction shall be $2,890.00; and all calculations shall be on a 1,000 square foot, or portion thereof, basis. A schedule of the Capital Facilities Capacity Charges specified herein will be on file in the Office of the Board Secretary of the District, and in the Building Department of each City within the District. 2Low Demand connections are the following categories of Users: Nurseries; Warehouses; Parking Structures; RV Storage; Churches; Truck Terminals; RV Parks; Lumber/Construction Yards; and other dischargers whose flow is similar in volume to these listed categories. 3High Demand connections are the following categories of users: Restaurants, Supermarkets; Car Washes; Coin Laundries; Amusement Parks; Shopping Centers with Restaurants; Food Processing Facilities; Textile Manufacturers; and other dischargers whose flow is similar in volume to these listed categories. 4All other connections are Average demand users. "SFR—The rates for each size of SFR and MFR are established with a 3-bedroom SFR having a base of 1.0, and all others are a relative percentage higher or lower than 1.0, depending on size of unit, as noted. WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 18 Section 3.07. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Significant Commercial — Industrial Users and Special Purpose Dischargers — Definitions. A. A Significant Commercial — Industrial User ("SCIU") is any person or entity who discharges commercial or industrial process flow, but excluding domestic sewage flow, in an amount greater than 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or Biochemical Oxygen Demand ("BOD") greater than 150 pounds per day, or Suspended Solids ("SS") greater than 150 pounds per day, or who is required to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit, as prescribed by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, Article 3, due to having federally or District regulated or significant discharges. B. A special purpose discharger ("SPD") is any person or entity who discharges to the sewer system wastewater or process flow in an amount greater than 25,000 gpd (excluding domestic, industrial or commercial) and who is required to obtain a Special Purpose Discharge Permit as prescribed in Section 305 of Ordinance No. OCSD-01 or its successor. C. An Existing SCIU or SPD is any SCIU or SPD connected and discharging to the District's system prior to January 1, 2000. D. A New SCIU or SPD is any user who connects and discharges to the District's system pursuant to a Waste Discharge Permit issued on or after January 1, 2000; or if previously connected and not an SCIU, as defined in Subparagraphs 3.07A and B above, but, subsequent to January 1, 2000, increases flow, or BOD, or SS to a level as to constitute an SCIU or SPD. E. The maximum discharge allowed to a user, for which a base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid, as per Table C, above, is 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 150 pounds each of BOD and SS (the "base use"). Discharge of flow, or BOD, or SS in amounts greater than allowed by this Subsection 3.07E shall be subject to the provisions of Sections 3.08 and 3.09 hereof. F. Each Existing SCIU shall have a baseline of allowed discharge of flow, and BOD, and SS established by the District as of January 1, 2000. The baseline shall be based upon the discharge for Fiscal Year 1998-99, or upon such other discharge data which the District determines is representative of the user's actual annual discharge to the sewerage system. Dischargers who are deemed to be SCIU's solely because of the requirements to obtain a Waste Discharge Permit, pursuant to Section 3.07A above, shall have a minimum baseline established as follows: Flow—25,000 gallons per day; BOD — 150 pounds per day; and SS — 150 pounds per day. The SCIU shall be authorized to discharge flow, and BOD, and SS up to the baseline amounts without payment of a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04120/05 19 G. Each Existing SPD shall have a baseline of 25,000 gpd, 150 pounds per day of BOD and 150 pounds of SS. The Existing SPD shall be authorized to discharge flow up to 25,000 gpd without payment of a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. H. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as prescribed by Sections 3.08, 3.09, and 3.10 below, shall be payable commencing with the effective date of this Ordinance. I. Within two (2) years from the date of the District's written notice to the existing SCIU of its baseline amounts, the existing SCIU, as described in Section 3.07C, shall have a right to appeal the District's established baseline for the SCIU. The appeal shall be to the General Manager, or his designated representative, who shall have discretion, based upon extraordinary circumstances, wherein the established baseline is not representative of the historical average daily discharge by the SCIU for a yearly period, to modify the baseline amounts for the current year, or on a permanent basis, subject to terms and conditions as prescribed by the General Manager. The decision of the General Manager shall be final. Section 3.08. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Significant Commercial — Industrial Users. In addition to the base Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, as prescribed in Table C, for commercial — industrial use category properties, all New SCIU's shall pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge for each gallon of flow, or pound of BOD, or SS, exceeding the base use discharge maximums, in the amount shown in Table D. Section 3.09. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: New Special Purpose Dischargers. All New SPDs shall pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge of$0.001001 per gallon per day for each gallon of flow exceeding 25,000 gallons per day. Upon issue of permission to discharge, SPD with discharges above 25,000 gpd shall pay a nonrefundable Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, prior to discharge, for one million gallons above 25,000 gpd. The deposit will be credited by the District against future Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges. Section 3.10. Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Existing Significant Commercial — Industrial Users and Special Purpose Dischargers. A. All Existing Significant Commercial — Industrial Users connected to and discharging to the District's system shall be required to pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge upon the occurrence of either (i) an increase of discharge flow of 25,000 gallons per day ("gpd"), or 25% per day over its established baseline authorization, whichever is lesser; or (ii) an increase WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04120l05 20 of either BOD or SS discharge of 150 pounds each per day, or 25% each per day, whichever is lesser, over its established baseline authorization. B. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in the following amounts for each component that is increased as provided in Section 3.10A above: TABLE D SUPPLEMENTAL CAPITAL FACILITIES CAPACITY CHARGES Daily Charge Flow Gallons Per Day $0.001001 BOD Pounds Per Day $0.289100 SS Pounds Per Day $0.187150 C. All Existing SPDs connected and discharging to the sewer shall be required to pay a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge upon occurrence of an increase of discharge flow over 25,000 gpd. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be $0.001001 per gallon per day of discharge for each gallon above 25,000 gpd. D. The Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated on the basis of the average daily quantity of discharge in excess of the User's baseline or 25,000 gpd for SPDs. The daily averages will be based on the daily discharges for a year, utilizing discharge records and reports of the District. Section 3.11. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Replacement Structures. For new construction replacing former structures, the Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table C, less a credit amount, up to the amount of the new Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table C that would be for the prior category of use which was terminated and removed. Section 3.12. Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Remodeled Structures. In the case of existing structures connected to the District's system facilities, to which new construction or alteration is made to change or increase the category of use, a Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be calculated and paid to the District on the rate basis of the category of the new use and the amounts as set forth in Table C, less a credit amount, up to the amount of the new Capital Facilities Capacity Charge, equal to a charge, as prescribed in Table C for the prior category of use. WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 21 Section 3.13. Payment of Capital Facilities Capacity Charge: Off- Site Sewers Not Part of Master Plan Relative to Reimbursement Agreements. A charge for connection to off-site sewers which are not included as part of the District Master Plan and for which a Non-Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement has been entered into between the District and the property owner, shall be paid in the amount provided for in said Agreement, to be known as a Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge. The amount set forth in said Agreement shall be the amount due, provided the original Agreement is still in force. The Non-Master Plan Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall be in addition to the other Capital Facilities Capacity Charges provided for in Sections 3.06 through 3.10 hereinabove, established for property connecting to said facilities. Section 3.14. No Refund or Transfer. A Capital Facilities Capacity Charge is paid for the connection of a specific building or structure on a parcel of property. No refund of any charge shall be made because of non-use or change of use, or any other reason. The connection permit is non-transferable to any other parcel of property. Section 3.15. Baseline Transferability. The baseline of allowed discharge of flow, BOD and SS used to calculate a Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charge shall not be transferable, nor shall a credit for such previously existing baseline be provided to another SCIU concurrently or subsequently occupying the same property. Each such SCIU shall pay Supplemental Capital Facilities Capacity Charges in accordance with Section 3.08 above. WSBS-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 22 ARTICLE IV MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES AND FEES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGERS, SOURCE CONTROL PERMITTEES AND WASTEHAULERS Section 4.01. Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this Ordinance is to recover those costs incurred by the District (i) on account of industrial dischargers' and wastehaulers' use of the District's facilities; (ii) when administering the District's Source Control Program; and (iii) when performing non-compliance sampling of industrial wastewater dischargers who have violated the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations or the terms and conditions of the discharger's permit. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used to defray the costs incurred by the District (i) on account of such use of the District's facilities; and (ii) in performing these tasks. Section 4.02. Administrative Fees and Charges Relating to Permittees. Administrative fees and charges relating to permittees are hereby established in the sum or sums as set forth in Table E, below. Section 4.03. Source Control Non-Compliance Fees. Source control non-compliance fees are hereby established for dischargers' non- compliance sampling and for self-monitoring and data reporting non-compliance, in the sum or sums as set forth in Table F, below. Section 4.04. Special Purpose Discharge Permittees; Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 305.5 and 305.6 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, charges for use are hereby established for Special Purpose Discharge Permittees, as set forth in Table G, below Section 4.05. Class I and Class II Permittees — Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 302.3, 302.6, 303.3 and 303.6 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, the charges for use are hereby established for Class I and Class II Permittees as set forth in Table G, below. Section 4.06. Wastehauler Charges for Use. As authorized by Sections 306.3 and 306.7 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended, the charges for use are hereby established for wastehaulers as set forth in Table H, below. WSBS-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 23 Section 4.07. Administrative Appeals. A. Any user, permit applicant, or permittee affected by any decision, action, or determination by the District may, within forty-five (45) days of the date of mailing by the District of the initial invoice for fees imposed pursuant to this Ordinance, request that the District reconsider imposition of such fees. Following review of such a request, the District shall notify the user, permit applicant, or permittee by certified mail of the District's decision on the reconsideration request. B. Any user, permit applicant, or permittee adversely affected by the District's decision on the reconsideration request, may file an appeal in accordance with Sections 617 and 619 of the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance No. OCSD-01, as amended. WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04l20l05 24 TABLE E ADMINISTRATIVE FEES AND CHARGES RELATING TO PERMITTEES Permit Fees Charges A. Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit $785.00/year B. Class II Wastewater Discharge Permit $170.00/year C. Special Purpose Discharge Initial Permit Issue $1,050.00/year Nonrefundable Deposit for First 1 Million As Defined in Gallons — New Permit Only Table G Special Purpose Discharge Permit Renewal $750.00/year D. Wastehauler Discharge Permit $190.00/year Wastehauler Fees Charges F. Permit Decal Initial Issue $25.00 G. Permit Decal Replacement $50.00 H. Entry Card Initial Issue $50.00 I. Entry Card Replacement $100.00 J. After Hours Discharge — Prearranged $85.00/event K. After Hours Discharge — Emergency $100.00/event Administrative/Processing Fees Charges L. District's Collection of Tax Data $100.00/permit M. District's Collection of Water Consumption Data $100.00/permit N. Appeal Hearing Filing Fee $400/appeal WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04120/05 25 TABLE F INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGER, SOURCE CONTROL AND NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES Charge Cost of Processing and Sampling Following a Minor Violation $225.00/event Cost of Processing and Sampling Following a Major Violation $500.00/event Cost of Analysis Charge Heavy Metals: $35.00/each -Aluminum -Antimony -Arsenic - Cadmium - Chromium - Copper - Gold - Lead - Molybdenum - Nickel - Palladrum - Platinum - Selenium - Silver - Thallium - Zinc Mercury $78.00 601/602 $152.00 604 $223.00 606 $254.00 608 $523.00 610 $73.00 WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 26 TABLE F (CONTINUED) INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGER, SOURCE CONTROL AND NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES Charge 612 $200.00 624 $355.00 625 $661.00 Ammonia Analysis as Nitrogen $ 21.00 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) $ 44.00 BOD and Suspended Solids (SS) Analysis $ 67.00 Chemical Oxygen Demand $ 44.00 Conductivity $ 15.00 Cyanide (Amenable) $ 70.00 Dissolved Mineral Solids $ 15.00 Gamma Radiation Determination $115.00 Gross Alpha and Beta Determination $ 50.00 Tritium Determination $ 50.00 Oil & Grease (Hexane Soluble Matter) $ 74.00 Oil & Grease (Mineral Partition) $ 74.00 Total Organic Nitrogen $ 48.00 pH $ 8.00 Fluoride $ 51.00 Suspended Solids (Total) $ 23.00 Suspended Solids (Total and Volatile) $ 44.00 Total Dissolved Solids $ 14.00 Total Sulfides $ 29.00 SELF-MONITORING AND DATA REPORTING NON-COMPLIANCE Cost of Processing and Issuing Significant Non-Compliance Notification $165.00 Cost of Processing Annual SNC and Publication $260.00 WS&S-BRH:pj201660:04/20/05 27 TABLE G CLASS I AND CLASS 11 PERMITTEES AND SPECIAL PURPOSE DISCHARGE PERMITTEES CHARGES FOR USE Class I and II Permit User FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 Flow (*) $316.38 $577.30 $637.55 $711,27 $773.32 B.O.D. (**) $216.13 $270.68 $288.50 $311.21 $330.53 S.S. (***) $207.35 $414.27 $432.14 $454.19 $473.50 Domestic Equivalent $100.00 $115.00 $132.00 $153.00 $175.00 Special Purpose Discharge Permit FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05 FY 2005-06 FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 Flow(*) $316.38 $577.30 $637.55 $711.27 $773.32 B.O.D. (**) $216.13 $270.68 $288.50 $311.21 $330.53 S.S. (***) $207.35 $414.27 $432.14 $454.19 $473.50 Domestic Equivalent $100.00 $115.00 $132.00 $153.00 $175.00 (*) Flow Per million gallons of Flow (**) B.O.D. Per thousand pounds of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (***) S.S. Per thousand pounds of Suspended Solids All properties located within Revenue Area No. 14 pay no annual service fees. District costs relating to providing service to these properties are billed by OCSD directly to the Irvine Ranch Water District, the local agency providing the local sewer service. WSBS-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 28 TABLE H WASTEHAULER CHARGES FOR USE Wastehauler Fees Charges Charge for Use—Waste originating $0.035/gallon of within Orange County truck capacity Charge for Use—Waste originating $0.11/gallon of outside Orange County truck capacity WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20105 29 ARTICLE V MISCELLANEOUS Section 5.01. Application of Ordinance. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be in addition to the provisions of District Ordinance No. OCSD- 01, as amended, Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations for Use of District's Sewage Facilities, including provisions for payment of charges or fees related thereto; District Ordinance No. OCSD-21, as amended, Establishing Fees Concerning Annexations of Territory to the District; and any other District Ordinances and Resolutions not in conflict herewith. Section 5.02. Exceptions. The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to all owners of properties within the District, including those properties otherwise deemed exempt from payment of taxes or assessments by provisions of the State Constitution or statute, including properties owned by other public agencies or tax-exempt organizations, except as expressly provided herein. The Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District does further hereby ORDAIN: Section II. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance, or the application to any person or circumstances is held invalid by order of Court, the remainder of the Ordinance, or the application of such provision to other persons or other circumstances, shall not be affected. Section III. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect Section IV. Repeal. Ordinance No. OCSD-24 is hereby repealed. Section V. Certification and Publication. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as required by law. WSBS-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 30 PASSED AND ADOPTED by a vote of not less than two-thirds of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District at a Regular Meeting held CHAIR, BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ATTEST: SECRETARY, BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT GENERAL COUNSEL WS&S-BRH:pj:201660:04/20/05 31 Section 2.02. Annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge. Commencing with the effective date of this Ordinance, the owner of each parcel of real property located within the District which is improved with structures designed for residential, commercial, or industrial use and which, at the request of the owner or the owner's predecessor-in-interest, is connected to the District's system, shall pay an annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge based on the respective class of users, in the sum or sums, as set forth in Tables A and B of this Ordinance, below. The annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for residential users are set forth in Table A. Table B with Fe6peGt to the paFtiGWIaF u6e Gla66ifiGatien to arrive at the an . The annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for commercial or industrial users are dependent upon the respective classifications of property use, determined by reference to Table B; the applicable percentage figure shown on Table B with respect to the particular use classification is multiplied by the applicable single family residential rate shown in Table A, to arrive at the annual Sanitary Sewer Service Charge rate per 1,000 square feet for the commercial or industrial user. WSBS-BRH:pj:#201665:04/20/05 - REDLINE r TABLE B ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit 1 Vacant Land Parcel 0% 5 Common Area Parcel 0% 6 "Hold" Parcel 0% 8 Equivalent to Vacant 0% 121 Parcel of Minimal or No Value 0% 122 Subsurface Parcels 0% 124 Oil/Mineral Rights 0% 125 Mineral Rights Equipment 0% 126 Vacant Comm. Area-IMP Alloc. 0% 201 Homeowners Exemption AddT 0% 666 Unassigned Vacant 0% 777 Septic Tank Property 0% 112 Steel Building 7% 113 Mini-Warehouse 7% 58 Nurseries (Plants) 10% 100 Drive-In Theater 10% 44 Lumber/Constr. Material Yard 17% 71 Parking Garage 17% 72 Paved Parking Lot 17% 110 Warehouse— Single Tenant 17% 111 Warehouse—Multi Tenant 17% 115 Recreational Vehicle Storage 17% 116 Truck Terminal 17% 33 Church Buildings 20% 94 Department Store 23% 95 Discount Store 23% 96 Unattached Single Store 23% 97 Strip Store 23% 74 Recreational Vehicle Park 27% 36 Financial Buildings 27% 40 Health Club 29% 68 High Rise Office 30% 21 Automobile Dealership 41% 22 Auto Repair Shop 41% 23 Automotive Service 41% 24 Used Car Lot 41% 39 Golf Course 41% 57 Motorcycle/Small Vehicle Building 41% 83 Automotive Service Station 41% WS&S-BRH:pj:#201665:04/20/05 - REDLINE TABLE B (CONTINUED) ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit 84 Marine Service Station 41% 86 Combin.-Service Station/Convenience 41% 65 Single Office Bldgs. to 3 Stories 41% 66 Small Office Center 41% 67 Office Complex 41% 69 Converted Residence to Office 41% 7 Mobile Home 50% 55 Mobile Home Park 50% 107 Light Industrial—Single Tenant 50% 108 Light Industrial—Multi Tenant 50% 109 Research and Development 50% 114 Industrial Park 50% 37 Fraternal Buildings 51% 101 Unattached Theater 51% 26 Airport and Related Buildings 53% 45 Marinas 53% 88 Low Flow Shopping Center 53% 3 Two or More Residences 70% 10 Duplex Only 70% 11 Triplex Only 70% 12 04-Units Only 70% 13 5 to 16 Units 70% 14 17 to 25 Units 70% 15 26 to 40 Units Only 70% 16 41-99 Units Only 70% 17 100 or More Units 70% 18 Developed with a Mix of Forms 70% 63 Low Rise Retirement Building 70% 64 High Rise Retirement Building 70% 56 Motels 70% 81 Pre-Schools, Nursery or Care 82% 82 Private Schools 82% 98 Store with Offices or Living Quarter 82% 99 Store with Office Upstairs 82% 118 Governmental Use Vacant/Develop. 82% 19 SFR with 1or 2 rental units 85% 34 Dormitory 97% 42 Hospital 97% 43 Hotel 97% WSBS-BRH:pj:#201665:04/20/05 - REDLINE TABLE B (CONTINUED) ANNUAL SEWER SERVICE CHARGES PROPERTY USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USERS Percentage of SFR Assessor Use Code Description Per 1,000 SF or Unit ria Mntals and AAntnr Hotolr, 97% 0 Conversion-C/1, Rural PC 100% 2 One Residence 100% 4 Miscellaneous Improvement 100% 85 Comb. Serv. Stn./Restaurant 100% 103 Chemical Tank and Bulk Storage 100% 104 Food Processing Plant 100% 105 Cold Storage Plant 100% 106 Factory 100% 119 Public Utility 100% 120 Water Mutual or Company 100% 888 Conversion-Composite Prop. 100% 32 Cemetery & Related Buildings 101% 38 Funeral Home 101% 60 Nursing Home 102% 61 Convalescent Hospitals 102% 62 Converted Res. Used as Nursing 102% 28 Bowling Alleys 112% 92 Skating Rinks 112% 50 Single Medical Bldgs. to 3 Stories 124% 51 Small Medical Center 124% 52 Medical Center Complex 124% 53 High Rise Medical 124% 54 Converted Residence to Medical 124% 89 Average Flow Shopping Center 139% 20 Amusement Parks 144% 35 Entertainment Center 144% 73 Recreation 144% 30 Coin Operated Car Wash 151% 47 Supermarket 151% 48 Convenience Market 151% 224 Nightclub 200% 90 High Flow Shopping Center 226% 76 Restaurant—Take Out 300% 77 Restaurant—Coffee Shop 600% 78 Restaurant— Dinner House 600% 79 Restaurant—Conversion from SF 600% 29 Conventional Car Wash 796% 223 Laundromat 1,800% NOTE: Multiply the Table A Single Family Residential Rate by the percentage figure above in order to determine the rate per 1,000 square feet for the commercial or industrial user. WS&S-BRH:pj:#201665:04/20/05 - REDLINE TABLE E ADMINISTRATIVE FEES AND CHARGES RELATING TO PERMITTEES Permit Fees Charges A. Class I Wastewater Discharge Permit $335 785.00/year B. Class II Wastewater Discharge Permit $7-A 170.00/year C. SpeGial Purpe6e Discharge Permit $250 /lv 00iy Special Purpose Discharge Initial Permit Issue $1,050.00/year One-Time $975 (1(1/ncrmit crrrc-r-m� �r''MM ry Nonrefundable Deposit for First 1 Million $368-58 As Gallons — New Permit Only Defined in Table G Special Purpose Discharge Permit Renewal $750.00/year D. Wastehauler Discharge Permit $75 190.00/year Wastehauler Fees Charges F. Permit Decal Initial Issue $25.00 G. Permit Decal Replacement $50.00 H. Entry Card Initial Issue $50.00 I. Entry Card Replacement $100.00 J. After Hours Discharge— Prearranged $85.00%vent K. After Hours Discharge — Emergency $100.00/event Administrative/Processing Fees Charges L. District's Collection of Tax Data $100.00/permit M. District's Collection of Water Consumption Data $100.00/permit N. Appeal Hearing Filing Fee $400/appeal WS&S-BRH:pj:#201665:04/20/05 - REDLINE GWRS Steering Committee March 14, 2005 MINUTES GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM STEERING COMMITTEE STEERING COMMITTEE (A Committee of Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District Directors) OCWD Boardroom, 10500 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley Monday, March 14, 2005, 5:30 p.m. Committee Members Philip L. Anthony OCWD Director, Chair ....................Present Paul Cook OCWD Director ........................Not Present Kathryn Barr OCWD Director...............................Present Steve Anderson OCSD Director .........................Not Present Mike Duvall OCSD Director .........................Not Present Carolyn Cavecche OCSD Director .........................Not Present Alternates Roger Yoh OCWD Director(No. 1) ...................Present Jan Debay OCWD Director(No.2) Not Present Not Yet Appointed OCWD Director(No.3) .............................. Jim Ferryman OCSD Director(No. 1) ....................Present Don Bankhead OCSD Director(No. 2) ....................Present Lary Crandall OCSD Director(No. 3) ....................Present Other Directors Present Wes Bannister, OCWD Denis Bilodeau, OCWD CONSENT CALENDAR(ITEM NO. 1-2) MOTIONIVOTE ACTION TAKEN 1. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING ANTHONY-AYE RECOMMENDATION:Approve Minutes of the February 28,2005 BARR—SECOND,AYE APPROVED Groundwater Replenishment System Steering YOH-AYE Committee Meeting as mailed. FERRYMAN—AYE BANKHEAD—AYE CRANDALL—MOTION, AYE 2. LIMITED TERM EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT FOR LAURA ANTHONY-AYE THOMAS BARR—SECOND,AYE APPROVED RECOMMENDATION:Agendize for the March 16 OCWD Board YOH-AYE meeting: Authorize execution of a two-year FERRYMAN—AYE limited term employment agreement with Laura BANKHEAD—AYE Thomas to manage tasks in the electrical, CRANDALL—MOTION, instrumentation,process control and integrated AYE information system disciplines for the GWR System at an hourly rate of$91.16 per hour for April 1, 2005 to March 31,2006 and$95.72 per hour for April 1,2006 to March 31,2007,with these costs being shared between the OCWD and OCSD. - 1 - GWRS Steering Committee March 14, 2005 END OF CONSENT WORKSHOP 3. GWR SYSTEM ADVANCED WATER PURIFICAITON FACILITY INFORMATIONAL OPERATION INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 4. ADVANCED WATER PURIFICAITON FACILITY COST SAVINGS INFORMATIONAL UPDATE 5. PROJECT SCHEDULE AND BUDGET UPDATE INFORMATIONAL 6. CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS PROGRESS INFORMATIONAL 7. MONTHLY CHANGE ORDER UPDATE INFORMATIONAL 8. STATUS REPORT INFORMATIONAL • Grants and Loans Update • Public Information and Education Update DIRECTORS'ANNOUNCEMENTS/REPORTS GENERAL MANAGERS'ANNOUNCEMENTS/REPORTS ADJOURNMENT 6*50 P.M. -2 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To Bd.of Dir. 4-27-05 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 16 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, D.Env., Director of Technical Services Department Originator: Ed Torres, Environmental Compliance Services Manager SUBJECT: Exchange of Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) Air Emission Reduction Credits for Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) Air Emission Reduction Credits GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and complete a transaction with Natsource LLC for the exchange of up to 130 Ibs/day of District owned Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) Emission Reduction Credits for up to 130 Ibs/day of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) Emission Reduction Credits; for a not to exceed cost of $1,000 for filing the transaction with the SCAQMD. SUMMARY • In 1993 the District installed the Central Generation System (CGS) engines at both treatment plants providing electricity and heat for wastewater treatment processes. • As a requirement of our SCAQMD permit for the engines, the District purchased emission reduction credits to offset the engines additional emissions. Excess emissions beyond what was required for the permit was purchased and the District currently owns the following ERCs: Reactive Organic Gas (ROG) — 688.5 Ibs/day Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) — 155 Ibs/day Carbon Monoxide (CO) — 132 Ibs/day Particulate Matter (PM) — 1 lb/day Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) — 0 Ibs/day • The District has been approached by Natsource LLC, a third party broker who is representing a company seeking SOx ERC's. The company is proposing a one for one swap of our SOx ERC's for NOx ERCs that they own. Based upon the SCAQMD's 2004 pricing summary a pound of SOx and NOx are worth $7,156 and S8,187; respectively. Based upon this information the swap would be a good business decision for the District. • Based upon strategic planning conducted by Staff, the District will need 5.8 to 22 Ibs/day of SOx ERC's and 29 to 242 Ibs/day of NOx ERC's to offset emissions from future facilities. • Based upon these future emission projections, Staff recommends that we retain at least 25 Ibs/day of SOx ERCs. H%depttagenda\Board Agenda Reportst2005 Board Agenda&Agenda Reports%0405111em 16 Emission credit dcc Revised 06/04/03 Page 1 • The primary air emission coming from future facilities is NOx: therefore acquisition of NOx ERC's would reduce the Districts future costs for these ERCs. • The company seeking our SOx ERCs has agreed to pay the 3.5% broker commission for the transaction which amounts to approximately $33,000. • Staff recornmends that we exchange up to 130 Ibs/day of SOx ERC's for NOx ERCs. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS None PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY NA BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted. but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. X Not applicable The District owns 155 Ibs/day of SOx ERCs. At an estimated value of $7,156/lb of SOx, the value of 130 Ibs of SOX ERC's is $930,280. An equivalent 130 Ibs of NOx ERC's, estimated at $8,187/lb is valued at $1 ,064,310. The net benefit to the District of a direct exchange of NOx for SOx ERCs is $134,030. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES Retain 155 Ibs/day of SOx ERCs and use some of them and sell the remainder in the future as new facilities are permitted with SCAQMD. The impact of this decision cannot be determined at this time; however, the likelihood is that NOx ERC's will be in greater demand than SOx ERC's thereby increasing the Districts cost in the future. CEQA FINDINGS NA ATTACHMENTS None H ldeptlagendalBoard Agenda Reports12005 Board Agenda&Agenda Reports\0405111em 16 Emission credit doc Revised M04103 Page 2 - Orange County Sanitation District BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT OPTIONS WHITE PAPER SA NIr,4 o�JN T'oti March 16, 2005 Ca Prepared Jointly by: 1 Environmental Assessment Division • Engineering Planning Division 9o�FCT�Nc THE E Summary This report was prepared for the Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) Board of Directors to provide an overview of future biosolids management alternatives. In April 2005 the Board will be asked to make several significant decisions on the future direction of OCSD's biosolids management program. This report along with oral presentations from OCSD staff and the Biosolids Advisory Committee will help the Board understand the many issues related to Biosolids management and facilitate the Board's decision making process. Specifically, this report presents information on the following subject matter: 0 Overview of wastewater treatment and biosolids production process • Brief history on biosolids management • OCSD's Biosolids Policy and the Environmental Management System for Biosolids • OCSD's current biosolids management program • Regulatory and legislative developments _- • The Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan ,,►: �' . Request for biosolids management proposals • Biosolids research survey and the Biosolids - Advisory Committee Report • Biosolids management alternatives, including potential in-County options • Future Board actions OCSD's Wastewater Treatment and Biosolids Production Process OCSD's regional 650-mile sewer system collects the sewage from businesses and industry in north and central Orange County and carries it to our ' treatment plants in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach. Modern wastewater treatment plants, like OCSD's facilities, include several operating systems that work together. The major processes are preliminary treatment, primary treatment, secondary treatment, and solids handling. _ r Primary treatment removes solids by settling heavy materials and skimming floating materials. The solids removed during primary treatment are called primary sludge. Secondary treatment removes biodegradable organic - 1 - material through a biological process where bacteria consume the organic material remaining in the wastewater. The clean water and bacteria are then transferred to settling tanks where the bacteria settle to the bottom as a stream called secondary sludge, or waste activated sludge. The treated wastewater is then released through a pipeline located 200 feet on the ocean floor at a distance of over four miles off the coast of Huntington Beach. The sludge is moved to large tanks where it is digested by microbes that produce methane gas in the process. The reduced volume , of sludge that is left behind, known as biosolids, is a nutrient rich solid material that is recycled as a soil amendment on farmland. Some of OCSD's biosolids are further processed to produce an earth-like product for commercial and home gardens to improve and maintain fertile soil and stimulate plant growth. OCSD's long-standing Board policy promotes recycling of its biosolids. Brief History of Biosolids Management in the U.S. Biosolids management is one of the most successful environmental operations accomplished in our modern society. A sign of that success is that the average citizen is not aware of what happens after their toilet is flushed. In the days before public wastewater treatment, the management of human waste was an acute societal and .r public health problem. Now, wastewater treatment represents a silent solution that is considered someone else's responsibility in the public's eyes. The reality is that wastewater treatment remains a societal responsibility that affects every one of us. The challenges faced today by the wastewater treatment agencies serving the public are challenges that affect us all. The term sewage sludge refers to the solid material produced by the wastewater treatment processes. When the sewage sludge is properly treated and acceptable for recycling, it becomes "biosolids." Biosolids are the nutrient-rich organic matter resulting from the treatment of wastewater that can be beneficially used and applied like a fertilizer to improve and maintain productive soils and stimulate plant growth. When beneficially used, biosolids are generally managed in four forms: as a rich moist soil amendment, dried pellet, liquid, or compost. With the advancements in technology, processed biosolids can also be used in a fifth form, as a fuel source. Biosolids can also be managed in landfills when other beneficial use options are not available, accessible, or are too costly. J4ov-.D srgres Pursuant to requirements contained in the federal Clean Water Act, • U.S. EPA published Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage W Sludge, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulation, Part 503 (Part a 503). In Part 503, EPA established three categories of biosolids for regulatory purposes; Class B biosolids, Class A biosolids and Q, FROT` Class A Exceptional Quality biosolids. • Class B Biosolids are biosolids that contain low levels of pathogens that rapidly die-off when applied to soils, essentially becoming pathogen free within a short -2- period following application, when Part 503 requirements are followed. This category establishes application site restrictions (e.g., buffer zones) to result in the same level of public health and environmental safety as Class A biosolids. • Class A Biosolids are biosolids that are further processed at the sewage treatment plant and are essentially free of pathogens prior to land application. Restrictions are placed on the amount of metals (e.g., cadmium, zinc) allowed in the biosolids. The metal content requirements under Part 503 are the same for Class A and Class B biosolids. • Class A Exceptional Quality (EQ) are Class A biosolids that meet more stringent metal concentration requirements than Class A and Class B biosolids. Part 503 is a comprehensive, risk-based regulation created to protect human health and the environment from pollutants of concern that are present in biosolids. The rule is based on extensive scientific peer review, and was adopted following an extensive public review process. A recent National Research Council report published in July, 2002 concludes that "there is no documented scientific evidence that Part 503 has failed to protect public health." The report goes on to encourage additional scientific work to address questions raided by the public and academia about the potential for adverse human health effects from exposure to biosolids. The beneficial use of biosolids is a national policy articulated by the US Congress when it banned ocean disposal of biosolids more than 30 years ago. Last year, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) adopted statewide policy reaffirming and encouraging the beneficial use of biosolids. The SWRCB regulates land application of biosolids through a General Order. The Regional Water Quality Control Boards use the General Order or issue site-specific local permits to exercise control over biosolids uses. Biosolids are regulated, and in some cases banned, at the local level via county CountyBiosolids Ordinances ordinances. Stringent local requirements are the largest challenge to OCSD's existing biosolids management program. Although - OCSD utilizes several biosolids management options, some are not sustainable over the long term due to existing or anticipated Actual Ban r restrictive local ordinances. =Practical San Restricted Use—Class A Reasonable Public health and nuisance concerns related to the land application of Class B biosolidsM None are driving the promulgation of restrictive ordinances. Specific concerns cited by the general public and local officials include the presence of pathogens, heavy metals, other chemical constituents in biosolids, and odors in areas where land application occurs. -3 - • Pathogens: Biosolids undergo a process to significantly reduce pathogens during wastewater treatment. The resulting pathogen levels are often below those found in animal manures. Operational controls are required at the land application site under the Part 503 Rule to minimize the potential for human and animal contact until environmental factors (e.g., sunlight) further reduce pathogen levels. Scientific studies show that Part 503 requirements protective of the health of not only those too performing land application but the public living adjacent to the sites as well. • Metals: Although trace metals are present in biosolids, numerous studies find W, average metal concentrations in biosolids are well below the most stringent standards set forth in Part 503. They are often less than those found in many commonly used commercial fertilizers. • Other Chemical Constituents: OCSD's source control program controls the entry of many chemical constituents into the wastewater stream. Two groups of organic chemical compounds that are of public concern are polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dioxins. Recent EPA studies and risk assessments find these groups of chemicals present in biosolids generally at levels similar to environmental background levels. • Odors: Class B biosolids and some Class A biosolids can create unpleasant odors if not properly handled during the land application process. These odors typically abate after the initial application is complete. To date, numerous scientific studies show no correlation between the odors and negative health impacts. Brief History of OCSD's Biosolids Management Program From 1979 to 1981, OCSD operated an air drying/composting site at Coyote Canyon Landfill (operated by the County of Orange). The biosolids were dried and composted to the required 50% solids content prior to being blended with municipal solid waste before landfilling. During much of the 1980s, OCSD trucked biosolids to the Coyote Canyon Landfill and the BKK Landfill in West Covina. In 1988, new recycling initiatives were undertaken using three separate contractors. Two agreements were made with compost contractors, and one with an agricultural fertilizer contractor. Using these options, OCSD beneficially reused approximately 50% of its biosolids from 1988 through October 1991. From November 1991 through today, OCSD is meeting the goal of 100 percent beneficial reuse of its biosolids. This is accomplished through land application of Class B biosolids in California, Arizona and Nevada, conversion to Class A biosolids through composting in California and Arizona, and conversion to Class A biosolids through lime addition in Kern County, California. OCSD's Biosolids Policy (Resolution NO. OCSD 02-18) and the Environmental Management System for Biosolids (Certified July. 2003) The current OCSD Biosolids Management Policy is as follows: -4- • Maintain a diverse biosolids management program f. including the application to nontable-food crop Y agricultural land in Southern California and Arizona. .,�•� • Promote the continuance of biosolids recycling for nontable-food crop agricultural land in a manner that is safe, environmentally beneficial, and sensitive to the needs of all affected communities. • Implement the National Biosolids Partnership's` Code of Good Practice as a basis for ant. Environmental Management System for its biosolids management program. _ • Implement biosolids reuse using a diverse market program with the maintenance of failsafe, or backup options. OCSD follows the best management practices promulgated by the California Water Environment Association and the Code of Good Practice of the National Biosolids Partnership (NBP), an alliance among the Environmental Protection Agency, Water Environment Federation, and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies. OCSD is the first agency in the nation to be certified under the NBP's Environmental Management System program (EMS). The EMS is the nationally recognized industry standard for best practices for biosolids management. OCSD's Current Biosolids Management Program OCSD produces 650 tons of Class B biosolids per day, or 240,000 tons per year. With the increase in secondary treatment, OCSD's biosolids production is projected to reach approximately 850 tons per day or 310,000 tons per year by the year 2020. OCSD's biosolids are currently managed by three contractors: Land application of Class A lime-stabilized biosolids in Kern County and Kings County, California by Tule Ranch, Land application of Class B biosolids in Yuma and Maricopa counties, Arizona by Synagro and Tule Ranch, Composting of Class B biosolids in Riverside County, California and La Paz County Arizona by Synagro, and Usage of Class B biosolids as alternative daily cover material at two landfills in Yuma County, Arizona by California Soil Products and Tule Ranch. - 5 - Figure 1: OCSD's Current Biosolids Management Costs Contract Est. Tons Management Cost per EstimatedProcessing Company End per Year' Option Ton Annual Location Cost Class B land app. $37.62 Maricopa Co., AZ Synagro 7/2005 94,000 Class A compost $38.50 $3,807,0002 Corona, CA Class A compost $45.50 La Paz Co., AZ Class A compost $49.003 Kern Co., CA -- CA Soil 3/2007 26,000 Class B landfill $39.84 $1 036'0004 Yuma Co., AZ Products Class B land app. $37.75 Yuma Co., AZ Yakima 1/2012 0 Landfill cover $36.00 $0 La Paz Co., AZ Class B land app. $39.75 Yuma Co., AZ Tule 1/2006 120,000 Class A stabilized $38.00 $4,620,0006 Kern County Ranch Class A stabilized $36.00 Kings County Class B landfill $39.75 Yuma Co., AZ Based on 240,000 tons of biosolids produced per year(2004). Tonnage allocations are expected to vary due to factors including inclement weather, material management issues, and regulatory developments. 2 Estimated annual cost based on a blended average cost of$40.50 per ton. 3 Option not anticipated being available until mid-2006. 4 Currently utilizing only the landfill option in order not to over burden the land application options in AZ. 5 Currently not utilizing this option due to regulatory and La Paz Co., AZ v. Yakima litigation concerns. 6 Estimated annual cost based on a blended average cost of$38.50 per ton. Figure 2: Biosolids Management Locations 35% (65 trucks/week) -� Class A Product: Farmland Lime-Stabilized Vendor:Tule Ranch Re•;os os:a5 Locations: Kings County,CA �- Kern County,CA NV AJ AZ 0%(temporarily) CA Class B Product: Farmland-Fertilizing Vendor:Synagro Location: Maricopa County,AZ -- 26% (5U-EiU trucks/week) Class A Product:Compost Vendor:Synagro Locations:La Paz County,AZ` ocso 22% (40 trucks/week) Riverside County,CA 'La Paz County currently taking extra loads due to wet Class B Product: Farmland-Fertilizing fields and equipment issues in Mancopa County.AZ Vendor:Tule Ranch Location:Yuma County,AZ 11% (20 trucks/week) 6% (10 trucks/week) Class B Product: Landfill&Landfill Cover Class B Product: Landfill Vendor:California Soil Vendor:Tule Ranch Location:Yuma County,AZ Location:Yuma County,AZ -6- Figure 3: Annual Biosolids Tonnage and Management Costs (1988 —2004) Annual Tons of Cost S Millions Biosolids S10 M 300,000 S9 M S8 M 250,000 $7 M Biosolids (tons) 200,000 S6 M $S M Annual Cost 150,000 S4 M 100,000 S3 M $2 M 50,000 $1 M So M 0 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Legislative and Regulatory Developments On February 22, 2005, State Senator Dean Florez (D-Fresno) introduced SIB 926. This bill would require each local public agency to beneficially reuse at least 75% of its biosolids by January 1, 2010. SIB 926 would prohibit an agency from exporting its — biosolids to another, but would authorize the appropriate regional water quality control board to grant an exception to that prohibition if certain requirements are met. As previously mentioned, counties throughout California and Arizona have in place or are developing local ordinances that restrict or ban the land application of Class B biosolids and some forms of Class A biosolids. These restrictive local ordinances work to limit OCSD's biosolids management options. As shown in Figure 4, sustainable beneficial reuse options of sufficient capacity to meet OCSD's needs are rapidly dwindling. Staff estimates that 70% of our current beneficial reuse capacity can be r` counted on after 2007. —7— am Figure 4: Estimated Sustainability of OCSD's Current Biosolids Management Program Company Management Cost per Sustainability Concerns Longevity Capacity Option/Location Wet Ton Est. Yrs. /o • Public/Political Perception Class B land app, $37.62 Maricopa Co., AZ 0 Large volume of CA 2 100 biosolids Class A compost, $38.50 • CUP validity (2008) 3 10 Synagro Corona, CA • Odor potential Class A compost, Public/Political Perception La Paz Co., AZ $45.50 Product marketingIndefinite 30 Class A compost, • Yet to be built (mid-2006) * Kern Co., CA $49.00 Kern County Politics Indefinite 40 Class B land app, Public/Political Perception CA Soil Yuma Co., AZ $37.75 Large volume of CA 2 100 Products biosolids Class B landfill, $39 84 • Not true "beneficial reuse" Indefinite 45 Yuma Co., AZ unless used as cover Landfill cover, Litigation with La Paz Co. Yakima La Paz Co., AZ $36.00 AZ regulatory compliance Indefinite 100 Class B land app, $39.75 Public/Political Perception Yuma Co., AZ Large volume of CA 2 100 biosolids Class A stabilized, $38.00 • Kern Water Agency— MWD g —Sen. Florez le 3 35 Tule Ranch Kern Co., CA Not a biosolids "product' Class A stabilized, $36.00 Compost only in 2006 1 30 Kings Co., CA • Not a biosolids "product" Class B landfill, Not true "beneficial reuse" Yuma Co., AZ $39.75 unless used as cover Indefinite 15 ..+ *OCSD has a contract with Synagro to compost 200 tons of biosolids per day.As designed,this facility will have the capacity to manage 325 tons per day of OCSD's biosolids.This excess capacity may not be available for long. The facility can be expanded to manage 100%of OCSD's biosolids production. Stemming in large part from the restrictive ordinances now in place in Kern and Kings Counties, OCSD's biosolids management costs have risen from an average of$20 per ton in 1999 to $40 per ton in 2005, with one existing management option being as high as $45.50 per ton. Other wastewater agencies are seeing their management costs go higher as well, as shown in Figure 5. r —8— r.d Figure 5: Comparison of Nine Other Biosolids Compost/Drying Class A Product Projects Agency Technology Location Facility Status Start Cost per Date Wet Ton LACSD - In-vessel ASP' Rancho Permitted & designed 2006 $70+ IEUA Compost Cucamonga Under construction Sacramento Dryer Sacramento Operational Regional Pellitizer WWTP 2004 $128 Las In-vessel Malibu Operational 1995 $145 Vir enes Compost Encina Dryer Encina Permitted & designed 2005 $74 Pelletizer . Out to bid Corona Dryer Corona ' Under construction 2005 S52 Pelletizer . Waste heat available Santa Rosa In-vessel Santa Rosa ' Operational 1996 $90 Compost LACSD Open-air ASP' • In permitting process Westlake Composting Kings County 2007 $70+ p g Pending litigation Synagro Open-air ASP' Permitted & designed 2006 SKIC Com ostin Kern County (May) $49 SOCWA- In-vessel ASP' PDL Landfill Conceptual feasibility 2009 $70+ OCSD Compost ASP = Aerated Static Pile composting using an amortization period of 20 years and a 50/10 cost of money. Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan In December 2003, the Board of Directors adopted a Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan (LRBMP) that describes a sustainable, publicly acceptable, environmentally-sound, and economical management program for the next 10 to 15 years. Specifically, the LRBMP recommended five actions: • Employ new in-plant technologies to reduce the volume of biosolids handled by OCSD's two treatment plants, • Move to the production of Class A biosolids products using established and reliable 1� technologies, � • Establish and maintain failsafe backup options for 100% of the biosolids produced at OCSD, • Work with member agencies and local stakeholders to develop in-county production facilities and markets, and —9— • Move into the following markets using vendor contracts for providing processing facilities, product distribution, and marketing: • Energy and fuel production ~' • Heat dried granular products • Heat drying with soil reclamation • Compost The LRBMP recommends using "merchant facilities" (private vendors) in the short-term to bridge the gap between the imminent phase-out of existing beneficial use alternatives and the implementation of OCSD-owned local facilities. It is estimated that OCSD- owned facilities could take eight to ten years to site, permit, design, and construct. The plan recommends OCSD utilize existing contractors to create Class A compost products and to seek new contracts by a Request for Proposal (RFP) process. The first goal was accomplished by amending Synagro's existing contract to include OCSD participation in Synagro's South Kern Industrial Center (SKIC) composting project. The Board of Directors approved the contract amendment at a cost of $49 per ton plus CPI increases for a minimum of 200 tons per day for 10 years. .r The LRBMP identifies several viable "merchant" facilities that are in a position to implement new biosolids management options in the short-term. These merchant too facilities depend on agencies like OCSD committing a significant portion of their biosolids production for a minimum of 10 years. In some cases, commitments to new regional merchant facilities may need to extend beyond the 10- to 12-year 'so period preferred in the LRBMP to make those facilities economically viable. Request for Proposal Process Based on the recommendations from the LRBMP, OCSD released five RFPs to obtain biosolids management services for the next ten years. Each RFP solicited proposals for managing a portion (200 tons/day) of OCSD's biosolids through a different technology. Staff was looking for one or more vendors to propose solutions that comply with our policy and provide the needed biosolids processing capacities in a timely and cost-effective manner utilizing one of the following technologies: Energy production . Off-site thermal drying for production of pellets or granules On-site thermal drying for production of pellets or granules Heat drying with processes soil Manufacture and marketing of compost products The RFP process started in July 2004 and ended in January 2005. OCSD received nine proposals, with at least one proposal for each technology. Five of the nine proposals lacked mandatory elements found in the RFP instructions and were rejected as non-responsive: -10- • Liberty Ranch, Inc. / McCarthy Family Farms — Power Production a Biosolids, Inc. — Offsite Dryer • Chaparral Farms— Class B Land Application - *""= M1 • American Biotech, Inc. — Composting • Solids Solutions, Inc. — Onsite Dryer The four remaining viable proposals were: - , c • Synagro, Inc. — Onsite Dryer • McCarthy Family Farms, Inc. — Composting • EnerTech, Inc. — Energy (char fuel production) • TPS, Inc. — Heat drying with fuel-contaminated soil OCSD's RFP evaluation process for these four viable proposals consisted of a two-step selection process. First, staff and consultants (Project Team) evaluated the proposals for each of the four technologies separately and selected the proposal which represented the "best value" for each technology. A consensus score from the Project Team was determined for each of eight evaluation factors: • Project experience, • Project team, • Financial capabilities, • Project schedule, • Project siting, • Permitting and site viability, • Technology viability, and • Product marketing. Next, Phase 2 of the RFP evaluation process evaluated and produced a score for the _ "best value" proposal for each technology category. This would allow the different technologies to be compared to produce the best solution(s) for OCSD's Biosolids Management Program. The Phase 2 rating was based on the following factors: • An analysis of the risks, • Total life cycle cost, and • Environmental concerns and impact. Three objectives were accomplished by utilizing this complex procurement process: — (1) select the most appropriate vendors based on the LRBMP recommendations; (2) an exemplary RFP process based on "fair and open" competition; and, (3) withstand public scrutiny and legal challenges in the courts. Contracts resulting from the RFP process are expected be awarded at the April 27, 2005 OCSD Board of Directors meeting. - 11 - ow Public Input: 2003 Biosolids Opinion Research Poll Conducted by Porter Novelli "" and the Biosolids Advisory Committee (BAC) In mid-2003, OCSD convened four focus groups consisting of 42 participants to gauge Orange County's residents' knowledge of biosolids. Most residents are unfamiliar with the term "biosolids" and are almost completely unaware how OCSD manages its biosolids. After hearing about the process of biosolids recycling and the opportunity to recycle biosolids within the County, residents are likely to be open-minded about the technology and supportive of the county taking responsibility to manage its waste. Specifically, the study revealed that residents are most concerned about the safety of biosolids recycling and rely on scientific evidence, academic research and examples of places where the technology is successful as a condition for approval. Among the options presented for biosolids recycling in the County, residents favor composting the most because they view it as a natural and environmentally-friendly process. The study showed that the "Not in My Backyard" (NIMBY) effect is likely to occur among those residents living close to where a biosolids recycling facility is located, but it appears that a strong, proactive education and information campaign may ease the fears and concerns of most residents about the issues of safety, odor, trucking impacts and air quality. Not surprisingly, arguments against biosolids recycling that focus on the dangers of biosolids to human health will instill fear in some residents mew and reinforce their doubts and concerns about the potential harmful effects of recycling human waste. Cost and impacts on the environment were found to be the top concerns. The top supporting messages for the management of OCSD's biosolids in Orange County are "research shows it is safe to use biosolids for fertilizer or compost" and "it is important that Orange County take care of its own biosolids." The top opposition messages are the need for a precautionary, go slow approach and concerns about odors. In general, the study stated that the "slate of supporting messages is stronger over all than the slate of opposition messages." A Biosolids Advisory Committee (BAC) was created in September 2004 to inform interested residents and stakeholders about OCSD's biosolids management program and to obtain public input on how to best implement the recommendations contained in the LRBMP. BAC members were selected through an application process based on qualifications such as geographic representation, expertise and group representation. Members of the BAC represented homeowner groups, business interests, environmental organizations, public policy experts, economists and technical professionals. The BAC is an advisory group to the Board of Directors and will provide their report and recommendations to the Board at the March 16 Biosolids Workshop. "' Short-and Long-Term Biosolids Management Alternatives As a part of the Biosolids Workshop, staff will provide information to the Board on both 'w the short-and long-term options available to manage OCSD's biosolids. The short-term options are meant to fill the gap for the management of biosolids over the next 10 years. No -12- kw No baw Figure 6: Short-Term Option 1: Contract for a New Option(s) Pursuant to the RFP Process (650 Tons) Wo Contractor Tons and Est. Technology Location Availability per day Cost/Ton EnerTech (RFP) 200—30% $70 Fuel Char Rialto, CA 2007 bob S na ro - SKIC 200—30% $49 ASP Compost Kern Co., CA June - 06 S na ro -AZ Soils 30—5% $46 Compost La Paz Co., AZ In Operation S na ro $40 Land A B Marico a Co., AZ In Operation ow Tule Ranch 130 —20% $38 Lime Addition Kern/Kings, CA In Operation Tule Ranch 30—5% $40 Land A B Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Tule Ranch $40 Landfill/ADC Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Ca Soil Products 60— 10% $40 Landfill/ADC Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Ca Soil Products 1 $40 Land A B Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Estimated daily cost$33,720,annual cost$12,307,800 • Pros of Short-Term Option 1: o Adds a sustainable non-agricultural biosolids management option (fuel) WO o Supports the development of a regional biosolids management facility within our watershed for southern Californian municipalities o Residual ash from biosolids fuel combustion becomes part of the cement product, no residual waste liability o Diversifies sustainable beneficial reuse options for OCSD o No capital risk to OCSD if the Enertech facility development is unsuccessful o Maintains at least one active failsafe landfill option • Cons of Short-Term Option 1: o EnerTech approximately $20 per ton more than the next highest alternative o EnerTech technology not proven with biosolids at full scale o Energy intensive process how o Minimum 10-year commitment for 200 tons of biosolids per day to both SKIC and Enertech may conflict with the feasibility of an OCSD-owned in- County biosolids management facility unless capacity assignment MW provisions are made Figure 7: Short-Term Option 2: Manage with Existing Contracts (650 Tons) Contractor Tons and Est. Technology Location Availability per day Cost/Ton S na ro- SKIC 200—30% $49 ASP Compost Kern Co., CA June—06 S na ro-AZ Soils 60— 10% $46 Compost La Paz Co., AZ In Operation S na ro $40 Land A B Marico a Co., AZ In Operation Tule Ranch 200—30% $38 Lime Addition Kern/Kings, CA In Operation Tule Ranch 60— 10% $40 Land A B Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Tule Ranch 60— 10% $40 Landfill/ADC Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Ca Soil Products 60— 10% $40 Landfill/ADC Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Ca Soil Products 1 $40 Land A B Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Estimated daily cost$27,360, annual cost$9,986,400 ..d —13— • Pros of Short-Term Option 2: o Maintains "low cost" of the biosolids management program o Additional capacity can be obtained at SKIC o Does not interfere with the ability to commit a larger volume of biosolids to in-County, OCSD-owned long-term biosolids processing facilities o Maintains two active failsafe landfill options • Cons of Short-Term Option 2: o High risk of lack of sustainability of the existing beneficial use options two o Depends on land filling and the potential for volatile tipping fees o Reliance on distant biosolids management sites expose OCSD to potential cost increases if diesel prices increase o Dependence on the stability of out-of-state regulatory developments During the implementation of either of the short-term options, OCSD staff will: UW • Continue to utilize Class B biosolids land application sites in Arizona as long as this option is viable and pending the development of SKIC, how • Explore Class A biosolids composting options at Tule Ranch (Kings County), and • If an in-County biosolids management option becomes available, contracts allowing, provide a tonnage preference to an in-County facility. The two potential long-term options proposed by staff are based on the production of 850 tons of biosolids per day (the anticipated OCSD biosolids production in 2020). The approximate anticipated costs for each of the long-term options in 2005 dollars are: Figure 8: Long-Term Option 1: Develop New In-County Long-Range Options (850 Tons) Contractor Tons and Est. Technology Location Availability per day Cost/Ton OCSD-Owned 300—35% $80+ ASP Compost "Great Park" 2015 OCS13-50% Owned 50—6% $70+ ASP Compost Prima D. 2010 — EnerTech 200—23.5% $70 Fuel Char Rialto, CA 2007 S na ro - SKIC 200—23.5% $49 ASP Compost Kern Co., CA June - 06 S na ro - AZ Soils 50—6% $46 Compost La Paz Co., AZ In Operation Tule Ranch 50—6% $38 Lime Addition Kern/Kings, CA In Operation Tule Ranch $40 Landfill/ADC Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Ca Soil Products $40 Landfill/ADC Yuma Co., AZ In Operation .., Estimated daily cost$55,500, annual cost$20,260,000 • Pros of Long-Term Option 1: o Adds sustainability to the biosolids management program o In-County control of operations addresses the public perception problem of exporting biosolids for management o Significant decrease in transportation-related impacts o In-County product reuse opportunities expanded WON —14— • Cons of Long-Term Option 1: o Potential for increased cost taw o Initial capital investment by OCSD o Financial risk of regulatory developments hindering or prohibiting the use of biosolids-based compost shifted to OCSD m o Siting and permitting issues and requirements Figure 9: Long-Term Option 2: Maintain the Selected Short-Term Options (850 Tons) UNH Contractor Tons and Est. Technology Location Availability % per day Cost/Ton t' EnerTech $70 Fuel Char Rialto, CA 2007 S na ro- SKIC 300—35% $49 ASP Compost Kern Co., CA June - 06 S na ro-AZ Soils 50—5% $46 Compost La Paz Co., AZ In Operation S na ro $40 Land A B Marico a Co., AZ In Operation Tule Ranch $38 Lime Addition Kern/Kings, CA In Operation Tule Ranch $40 Land A B Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Tule Ranch 250—30% $40 Landfill/ADC Yuma Co., AZ In Operation Ca Soil Products 1 250—30% 1 $40 LandfilVADC Yuma Co., AZ I In Operation Ca Soil Products 1 1 $40 Land App. B Yuma Co., AZ I In Operation] 40 Estimated daily cost$37,000,annual cost$13,500,000 • Pros of Long-Term Option 2: o Potential for a lower biosolids management cost utilizing existing options o Eliminates the use of OCSD's funds for capital improvements NO • Cons of Long-Term Option 2: o Majority of biosolids may be landfilled which is not considered by most to be a beneficial reuse option ow o Depends on land filling and the potential for volatile tipping fees o Landfill capacity may not be available o All biosolids exported out-of-County am o Transportation-related costs and environmental impacts � Use as alternative daily landfill cover and disposal of biosolids will continue to be important biosolids management options for OCSD because of the pressures on land application from more stringent regulations, declining public acceptance and rising costs b, of Class A biosolids production. In many cases, landfill operators welcome the landfilling of biosolids because biosolids take up minimal landfill space and provide liquids, which further the decomposition process that is integral to landfill operations. In addition, biosolids result in greater gas production and better quality leachate. —15— Past Board Actions 1. April 2004 OMTS/Board: Approve Amendment Number 7 to the Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of OCSD's Biosolids with Synagro West, Inc. (Synagro), providing a contract extension from 6/30/04 to 6/30/14 with two additional five-year extensions. Wd 2. March 2004 OMTS: Seek recommendation regarding the process to utilize the biosolids management option implementation process. 3. December 2003 OMTS: Receive and file Final Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7 dated November 2003 and prepared by CH2M Hill, Inc. 4. November 2003 OMTS/PDC: Informational item only regarding existing policies and potential future reuse costs outlined in the Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan. 5. October 2003 OMTS/PDC: Informational item only regarding the various in-plant treatment optimization options evaluated in the Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan. 6. September 2003 OMTS/PDC: Informational item only regarding the biosolids product markets and product technologies. HAd9pt\ts16201baro1di1\Bioso1ids Board Workshop 3-9-05-LB(6).doc e� -16- Orange County Sanitation District Advisory BIOSOLID�t Committee 0i z'l;'I��. o JNS Y S A N 1 TqT/o/Y Organics recycling for a better environment. I<,— FINAL REPORT tow Section I. Formation of the Biosolids Advisory Committee...........................1 Section II Project Plan for BAC..................................................................2 MW Education Review Vendor Proposals Vendor Proposal Evaluations SectionIII Findings..................................................................................4 Majority Recommendation Alternative View Long-Term Criteria Section IV Conclusion.............................................................................6 bow Attachment 1 - Biosolids Advisory Committee Biographies Attachment 2 - BAC Criteria MW Attachment 3- Summary of District Selection Criteria bw Attachment 4- Scoring Attachment 5- Summary of BAC Evaluations MW Attachment 6 - Summary of Pros and Cons regarding various biosolids proposals bui Attachment 7 -Alternative Viewpoint Attachment 8- Long Term: Elements of a Biosolids Solution ww� 000 Blosolids Advisory Committee Report V0+ One of the final products in the wastewater treatment process is biosolids, the solids component from the treatment process. Historically, this product was discharged to the ocean through the OCSD's ocean outfall sewer line. Over time, the regulatory agencies MW became more concerned that these biosolids might have environment impacts on the ocean and to the public that use the adjacent beach areas. This caused OCSD, like other wastewater treatment agencies, to end this practice and look for other alternatives. ftwo For OCSD, the solution became the trucking of the wet biosolids material to distant locations for composting and land application to enhance the nutrients in soil. In some cases, this product is used in landfills. For the most part, these sites are over 200 miles from the OCSD facilities. The San Joaquin Valley is a recipient of most of the biosolids "' generated by OCSD. Over the past few years, many of these sites in the San Joaquin Valley have restricted and raised concerns as to the long-term sustainability of this use making it more difficult for the OCSD to plan on the continued use of these many operations. It is expected over time that these restrictions will become more onerous and eventually phase out the ability to continue these operations. As such, it becomes very prudent for the OCSD to now look at other solutions to address biosolids. mr OCSD generates about 675 tons of wet biosolids per day and is primarily being trucked to many distant locations. Some of the political situations at these locations are ,�, becoming less accepting of biosolids and could end viability of OCSD use within the next few years. Some situations are viewed as having longer-term possibilities. Recognizing this situation, OCSD needs to identify other possibilities for using and recycling biosolids. ,w, The goal of OCSD's interim effort is to identify a use for 200 tons of biosolids per day thus giving OCSD some diversity and more flexibility in its disposal program. For the long-term, other biosolids possibilities need to be identified. ""1 Formation of the Biosolids Advisory Committee OCSD identified the need to create a Biosolids Advisory Committee (BAC)to: • examine OCSD's Long-Term Biosolids Management Plan and meaningful input on how to best achieve an interim solution bad • assist in the review of possible uses of the biosolids • meet the requirements of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to have "meaningful community involvement"in the planning for biosolids, and • submit to OCSD's Board of Directors our recommendations as to preferred interim approach to handling biosolids This work was relatively independent of similar efforts by the OCSD staff. The BAC committee was composed of members from various cities in the service area, business persons, economists, environmentalists, public policy experts, technicians, and others wanting to assist. bow Page 1 Ma The first announcement for volunteers to apply came out in early 2003. The committee formation was completed in the summer of 2004. The first meeting of the BAC was held in October 2004 and continued into February, 2005. The BAC generally met weekly in 2 told hour sessions with some of the January and February meetings lasting longer. Initially, there were 17 members on the BAC representing a diverse group on interests. By the end of the BAC effort, there were 15 members remaining. Information on the BAC members is provided in Attachment 1. A review of this list clearly shows that the OCSD's objective for diversity was fulfilled. Project Plan for BAC The Project Plan for the BAC consisted of four phases—education, review of vendor proposals, analysis and consensus building, and report writing with presentation. The first two items will be discussed in this section below and the remainder will follow under a separate heading. Education Since many of the BAC members did not have in-depth knowledge of the biosolids issues, the OCSD staff had an educational program to present various methodologies for handling biosolids like various forms of composting and heat drying technologies, along with identifying how the products from these technologies could be recycled for beneficial reuse. The technologies used by other wastewater treatment agencies that have similar concerns and issues were discussed at length. Options being utilized included expanding composting option in distant locations while others are looking at newer technology recognizing the likelihood that the distant composting options could be restricted/eliminated in the future. The BAC members toured various biosolids operations being used by other wastewater treatment agencies in the area. The BAC members were able to see firsthand the issues and concerns created by these operations especially regarding composting. Review Vendor Proposals •., Faced with an increasingly complex biosolids management and disposal issue, the OCSD requested proposals from various biosolids and other types of firms to propose on different biosolids solutions that will result in the diversification of OCSD's biosolids �i products, markets, and vendors. On July 29, a total of five Requests for Proposals (RFP) were issued to those interested in submitting proposals in the following four technology categories: • Biosolids Management for Energy Production • Biosolids Management with thermal Drying for Production of Pellets or Granules (Off-Site and/or On-Site) • Biosolids Management using Heat Drying and Soil +� • Biosolids Management through Manufacture and Marketing of Compost Products Page 2 MW m Initial proposals were due on October 26, 2004. A total of nine proposals were received by the District. Five (5) of the nine proposals were then determined by the OCSD staff to be unresponsive to the RFP instructions and thereby eliminated. The four remaining wmi proposals where evaluated by staff and each was asked to submit their best and final offer (BAFO). One proposal was received in each of the above referenced technology categories and were then summarized by OCSD staff in presentations to the BAC. In addition, the executive summaries in the proposals were given to the BAC members for their review and analysis. The four proposers and their technologies are listed below: • EnerTech—Energy Production • McCarthy Farms—Compost Production • Synagro—Dry Pellets • TPS—Heat Drying with Soil Vendor Proposal Evaluations To assist in the evaluation of the proposals, the BAC, after many meetings and hours of discussion, generated 10 evaluation criteria parameters with weighting factors that are included as Attachment 2. These factors and the weighting criteria were developed independently from that of the OCSD staff. The OCSD staff evaluation criteria are included as Attachment 3. With the criteria identified, the BAC members completed a scoring within each criteria for "` the four proposals to identify a numerical rating score To assist in the evaluation, the OCSD staff provided "life cycle" cost information for each technology which is listed below in order of increasing cost, and included as Attachment 4. cm • EnerTech-- $64 per wet ton tmo • TPS-- $72 per wet ton • McCarthy Farms--$87 per wet ton 01i • Synagro--$100 per wet ton The lowest life cycle cost was for EnerTech. ew The individual ratings (points) for each technology were tabulated and presented to the BAC for review. The results of the BAC numeric rating (points) by evaluation factor are +m� summarized below (the higher the points, the better the alternative) and presented on Attachment 5. wd • Synargro— 349 points • EnerTech-315 points no • McCarthy Farms-279 points • TPS-271 points m Page 3 The numerical rating system identifies Synagro as the preferred approach followed by EnerTech, McCarthy Farms, and TIPS. taw There was significant discussion of the "pros" and "cons" of each technology to supplement the numerical point rating system. This culminated in the preparation of a list of"pros" and "cons" for each technology. These factors included those identified by the BAC and those identified by consultants to the OCSD. From this lengthy list, a BAC subcommittee was established to prioritize the top four "pros" and "cons" in order of importance with the 1" being the top factor for each technology for review and comments by the entire BAC. This review occurred, comments made, and list finalized. The list of key factors for each technology is included as Attachment 6. This summarizes the views of the BAC relative to the strengths and weaknesses of the ar various proposals/technologies. Findings After extensive discussion of the various technologies, identification of"pros" and "cons", a numerical (point) rating system, and much discussion of each, the next step was to a, formulate a possible BAC recommendation to the Board of Directors. Initially the first thought was the Synagro proposal was the logical recommendation from the BAC because it had the largest number of points plus many other factors identified in attachment 6.The BAC then started identifying possible "deal killers" with all of the a`' technologies, raising a possibility that none would be recommended by BAC. As the discussion of the "deal killers" ensued, the BAC started to focus on the "strength" of the "deal killers" along with supplemental information provided by the OCSD staff. As the discussion continued, positions started to evolve: The BAC had little desire to recommend the McCarthy composting proposal as it would continue the OCSD's reliance on composting in the San Joaquin Valley that is subject to regulatory restraints, and further reduce our limited diversity in biosolids handling. The BAC was very concerned with always �.+ relying on "out-of-county" sites and this alternative would likely increase that even more. ,o, • With respect to the TPS heat soil approach, there was concern with the market for the product, the lack of experience on the part of the proposer relative to biosolids, and again an "out-of-county' site. There was also concern with the lack of responsiveness from TIPS when asked for further information relative to their proposal. • All along, the BAC was concerned with exporting all of our biosolids to other areas and not accepting responsibility for an "in-county" option. This concern caused a negative reaction to the significant"out-of-county" locations. • Synagro proposal was viewed with significant support because it received the largest number of points in the evaluation, was an "in-county" solution, used a mature technology, greatly reduced trucking and other wastewater agencies are using this approach. There was a concern whether it could be implemented in a timeframe needed by OCSD recognizing the likely Page 4 w ". aw neighborhood concerns that would require extensive discussion and outreach. There are also concerns with permitting of the technology at the OCSD treatment plant at the specified location, with existing technology both from the extended time to obtain the permits and to never being permitted. Finally, there are concerns with the costs of this proposal. Some members of the BAC questioned whether the facility should be located at the wastewater treatment plant site or some other location in the county. To change location and acquire additional property would add considerable time to implementing the technology. There was also the question whether Synagro or OCSD should build the facility. • After reviewing the finalized prioritized list of "pros" and "cons" of the EnerTech proposal, BAC support for the EnerTech project started to grow. �r The OCSD staff provided additional assurances that the technology will work based on recent inspections and discussion with experts and that the issue with "dioxin" could be addressed in the process. Also, the group thought that the project proposers were technically and financially substantial and thus had the resources to make the process successful. The BAC was further satisfied with the project, as it will likely have participation from other wastewater agencies, support from the City where the project is located, and have gone through the environmental process, making implementation more assured and quicker than the Synagro proposal. Additionally, this proposal is one of the lower cost alternatives. Further, while still 'but-of-county", it was a "' regional solution closer to OCSD than the TPS and McCarthy proposal. Majority Recommendation e.r After extended discussion of the EnerTech proposal, the BAC recommended by a significant margin the following: • OCSD move forward with the EnerTech proposal. Joni • The Board of Directors proceed with the EnerTech proposal subject to a more limited contracting period say upwards of ten years with "off-ramps" should other technologies become more viable for an "in-county" solution No • A third condition the BAC feels must be met prior to proceeding with the EnerTech proposal is to attain assurances this technology can be "scaled-up" 4XW to handle the amount of biosolids they are proposing. • A fourth condition the BAC feels must be met prior to proceeding with the Mid EnerTech proposal is to attain assurances that dioxin will not be an issue with this technology. It is also recommended that OCSD immediately proceed with additional technical and "1 environmental review of a non-destructive organic reuse pelletizer-type operation, composting or other technology "in-the-county" either by a vendor or OCSD on the OCSD plant site or another location in Orange County. The OCSD staff will also have time to address local environmental and permitting issues. Page 5 Alternative View One member recommended going forward with the Synagro proposal as it received the highest number of evaluation points from the BAC, the EnerTech proposal failed to identify a use for biosolids as outlined in the OCSD policies and for other reasons identified in a position paper included as Attachment 7. Long-Term Criteria This effort focused on the need for an identification of an interim solution. Over the long- term, it will be necessary for OCSD to focus on a true long term biosolids solution as reflected in Attachment 8. +� Conclusion We trust the report will be helpful to the Board of Directors in choosing an interim biosolids solution. We believe this was an effective process, and the BAC members were able to operate in a cooperative and respectful manner. The members took their responsibility seriously as biosolids will be an on going concern on the part of the OCSD. The BAC members were pleased they could make recommendations to the Board of Directors. OCSD staff support managed by Sonja Wassgren made sure the BAC had the resources to perform our mission. John Gavares provided effective facilitating to make sure optimal effort was accomplished with the short time constraints at the BAC meetings. Technical staff support and input from Jim Burror, Layne Baroldi, Mike Moore, and Deirdre Hunter made sure we had all of the information and access to their experience in the biosolids field without them trying to advocate a particular position or recommendation on a future course of action. And finally, the OCSD has a well respected, knowledgeable, and professional staff working to solve this difficult problem. low UIN Aw Page 6 .d dr BIOSOLIDS ADVISORY COMMITTEE BIOGRAPHIES ,may GARRY BROWN Founder and Executive Director of Orange County Coastkeeper, an environmental organization focused primarily on water quality. Garry has a bachelor's degree in Government and extensive training in public administration and environmental sciences. He has served on numerous task forces relative to OCSD going to full-secondary treatment and currently serves on the Ground Water Replenishment System Advisory Committee and the GWRS Scientific Advisory Committee. Garry serves on numerous boards of local and statewide environmental organizations. THOMAS ENGLAND Thomas W. England is a retired electrical contractor with a long record of community service. During his 20-year career with Owen Illinois Glass Company, he became a manager in plant maintenance, and studied electrical engineering. He also obtained a contracting license, and started his own company, England Electric. His contracting experience included several years in Saudi Arabia, where he was involved in their rural electrification program, as well as in general construction. Upon retiring in 1990, he volunteered with a number of civic groups, including the Center for Mediation, Sister City Association, of which he was president, League of Women Voters and ENACT, a four-county environmental committee. He served on the Citizens Advisory Commission for the City of Garden Grove Sanitation Department, and has a long time interest in infrastructure, water, and waste disposal. DONALD FROELICH Donald Froelich holds a Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in Civil Engineering and Registered Civil Engineer. Don worked in the public water industry at the Metropolitan Water District in planning for 24 years and retired after 13 years as manager of the City of Glendale Water Department. Currently he works part-time at Glendale managing a ground water contamination problem in the San Fernando Valley. RANDY T. FUHRMAN Randy Fuhrman holds a Bachelor of Science in Biochemistry from UCLA, and undertook Masters work in Chemistry/Biochemistry; Randy has a Juris Doctorate from Loyola Law School. He has participated in several OCSD citizen activities including, Planning Advisory Committee II (PAC2), Biosolids Environmental Management System (EMS) certification audit and re-audit, and the Biosolids EMS Steering Team (BEST). JANICE GLAAB tow Janice Glaab is a 22-year veteran of the California public relations and political scene. She has served as a top administrator for the California State Assembly and a top public affairs and media official for Governor Pete Wilson. She is an expert in public relations, communications and media and corporate imaging. �+ a& low EDWARD A. LABAHN Edward Labahn is a retired civil engineer with Bachelor of Science and Master of ,E, Science degrees in Civil Engineering, and a master's degree in Public Administration. Mr. Labahn is a Diplomate of the American Association of Environmental Engineers and is registered to practice in California as a Civil Engineer. He was formerly employed by Boyle Engineering and James Montgomery, consulting engineers and, more recently, by No the World Bank as a Water Supply engineer assigned to the Bank's East Africa and South Asia projects departments. ` w EDWARD MATTHEWS Edward Matthews holds a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, and a Master of Science in Structures and Mechanics. He is a registered Civil Engineer in California, low New York and North Carolina. Edward has over 20 years experience in commercial construction, including sanitary and hydraulic structures pipe and treatment plants. He is a member of the Salton Sea Nutrient TMDL Technical Advisory Committee, American bw Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation and California Water Environment Association. ,W PATRICIA(PAT) MCGUIGAN Pat holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Drexel University. She spent several terms serving the residents of Santa Ana as Councilwoman and on the City's Environmental and Transportation Commission (2003-2004.) A former member of the Orange County Sanitation District, she served as Chair of the Operation, Maintenance, and Technical services Committee for nearly 10 years. In addition to her work on the BAC, she is Chair of the Biosolids Committee of the Orange County Waste Management Commission and '�`r has been on the commission form 1982 to present. JOHN E. MCNAMARA b' John McNamara has a Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in Geology and Hydrogeology. He is a State of California Registered Geologist (No. 4863) and Certified Engineering Geologist (No.1725). John is currently employed as a geologist in the field Uri of environmental engineering for twenty years in southern California. Most of his experience is in the solid waste industry including landfills, composting sites (including sewage sludge), transfer stations, recycling facilities and refuse trucking operations. ,od Currently Vice President at Environ Strategy Consultants, Inc. in Irvine and they serve the solid waste, petroleum, and wastewater/ water supply industries. Environ Strategy provides environmental engineering and compliance services to industry and ,A, municipalities throughout California. CHRISTOPHER MILES Christopher Miles holds a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and English from USC. He served as a field deputy for a Los Angeles City Councilman. Chris is a current commissioner for the City of Fountain Valley Community Service Commission and member of the Tiburon Home Owners Association. RUSSELL PATTERSON Russ Patterson is a graduate of Cal State Fullerton with Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration. He is the owner of Masonry Contracting Business and a resident of Orange County for forty years. Russ is a member of the Board of Trustees of Connelly High School in Anaheim, past member of OCSD Board of Directors, former Chair of PDC Committee, former member of Joint Cooperative Committee of Groundwater Replenishment System and former Mayor and City Council member for the City of Villa Park. DAVID B. Ross David Ross has a Bachelor of Science degree in Business. He is a principal business consultant, immediate past chair of the Orange County Taxpayers Association, Chairman of the Visiting Nurse Association, and former director of the Orange County United Way. � RONALD SCHLENKER Ron Schlenker is the principal for R.C.S. & Associates, a published author and trainer, and an environmental, safety and health consultant to the industry. He currently serves MW as vice-president, Treasurer and program co-chair for the Industrial Environmental Coalition of Orange County (IECOC.) He also sits on the County of Orange Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) Health Care Agency Advisory Board and on the City of mid Anaheim CUPA. Ron holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Food Science/Enology/Chemistry and MA in Management. aw DONALD SCHULZ Donald Schulz holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Physics from U.C.L.A. He is a professional Electrical Engineer (P.E.) Cal. license no. 8187 (retired). Don is a member WN National Society of Professional Engineers and a Life Member-Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. Don also completed an Integrated Environmental Science and Technology Training Fellowship at CSUF in 1995. WW Don has served on the following committees: Huntington Beach Investigation Technical Advisory Committee Phase I thru 3, OCSD PAC Committees, SCCWRP microbiological committee, Bight '98, & '03, Surfrider Foundation Environmental Issues Team and is currently an Executive Member, Surfrider Foundation, and Huntington Beach/Seal Beach Chapter. MOY YAHYA Moy Yahya is a Senior Environmental Scientist/Consultant. He has a Master Degree in Science and over 20 years of experience in the fields of Water Quality and +•+ Environmental Microbiology. He serves as an active member on several project advisory committees with the Research Foundations of the American Water Works Association and Water Environment Foundation. He has published over 30 scientific articles and served as reviewer for the several scientific and technical journals. a., OW OCSD BAC Dec.21,2004 Meeting Summary of Meeting Discussion Notes The topic for the day was development of"weighted decision-making criteria for reviewing the proposals." „„ The following is a summary of decisions and comments: I. Final"Proposal Ranking Criteria" txbi Eleven of the twelve members of the BAC supported the following criteria. Ed Labahn did not want to support the criteria, stating that this process deviates from construction project procurement processes/practices. wo BAC Criteria Weight WW 1. Technology 25% a. Proven Technology Viability 15% No b. Potential for technological advances 10% ,mw 2. Environmental Impact/Societal Benefits 25% a. Project Siting 15% lod b. Permitting 10% 3. Project Team Capacity 20% a. Financing Capability 10% b. Project Management and credibility 5% c. Project Schedule 5% 4. Economics 15% �+ a. Impact on Rate Payers 10% b. Capital Appreciation Potential 5% tw, 5. Sustainability/Marketing Plan 15% a. Product Marketing/Good Business Plans 15% aw II. What BAC members like about the "Weighted Proposal Review too Criteria:" Discussion Notes 1. Having five criteria is better than eight! 2. The sub-components are well-thought-out. 3. Good framework. III. Questions, Concerns and Suggestions: Discussion Notes 1. The Criteria of"Project Team Capacity:" a. Consensus within the BAC was that the relative weight for"project team capacity" should be reduced and the relative weight for "cost"and "technology" should be increased. b. Recommendations were made to decrease the weight of this "criteria." The thinking was that many of these sub-criteria are "minimal requirements" and will have been met by the time the BAC reviews their proposals. C. One person asked "why give 5 points for morale/ethics," suggesting to make it zero. Recommended that it be reallocated to Financial Capacity. d. The weighting of the sub-criteria "Financial Capacity" was discussed. One person suggested that it be reduced from 10% to 5%, and another person suggested it be increased to 15%. e. The sub-criteria "Project Schedule, milestones and deliverables" was discussed. One person suggested that it be reduced from 5% to 0%, and another person stated that"scheduling"was a valuable criteria and should be retained. f. Moy noted that we have to trust what's in the proposals. If the vendor states that they have financial capacity, for example, or have never been convicted of a felony, we'll have to assume that these statements are accurate. 2. The Criteria of"Technology:" a. Recommendations were made to increase the "weight" of this criterion. b. Janice compared the "deal breakers" to the sub-criteria under technology. After analysis, the group agreed that these deal breakers were covered. The group felt that the sub-criteria include a) proven and reliable, and b) future viability, and c) r„ "politicaUpublic feasibility and acceptance" is covered under other criteria. taw 3. The Criteria of"Environmental Impact and Justice/Social Benefits" a. The BAC agreed to alter the title by adding "Societal Benefits" to the title. This terminology is important to some of the directors. "W b. The BAC agreed to remove the "colon"following "Project Siting." C. Moy suggested that this criterion include language re: the benefits to the community(e.g.jobs are developed, etc.). low 4. The criteria of Sustainability/Marketing Plans MW a. It was recommended that the sub-criteria "Proportion of Capacity Already Filled" be eliminated as a criteria, because, if the vendor can't deliver on this, they should be eliminated. am Wo wow ow 5. The criteria of"Economics/Cost:" fto a. Dave mentioned that at some point, should cost become excessive or prohibitive, it becomes a "deal breaker." The question was posed to staff, and to the BAC as a whole, as to what is the point in which the cost (e.g. impact on rate payers) is a " prohibitive, and the proposal should not be pursued, despite receiving excellent scores in the other categories. "' 6. The concept of"Deal Breakers:" a. See the notes above under"The criteria of"Economics/Cost." This M+ example illustrated the concept of"deal breakers." b. The BAC discussed possible contingencies should such a deal- breaker scenario arise. told C. One member stated we should identify "deal makers," as well as deal breakers. WW 7. The Ability of the BAC to Change the Criteria after Reviewing the Proposals: Mb a. Randy encouraged the group to be clear about their criteria in advance of reviewing the proposals, and not to alter them after reviewing the proposals. b. Others suggested that the BAC can be flexible as to the criteria for "'' review, and the relative weight of criteria. C. Pat clarified her position re: flexibility, stating that the language describing the sub-criteria under each of the criteria can fit under M' other criteria. 8. One person felt that going from 8 to 5 was great, and perhaps it could bw be reduced further, from 5 criteria to 3 criteria! IV. Meeting Schedule 1. January 111h- a. District staff will provide executive summaries of the proposals to the BAC, and will provide briefings/overviews of each proposal. b. The BAC will agree upon the process for reviewing and ranking the proposals. 2. January 181h - The BAC has agreed to make this a 3 to 4-hour meeting 3. January 251h 4. February 2nd �' 5. February 9"' wo tow V. Approaches for Reviewing the Proposals and Drafting a Report 1. The group will discuss this on January 11. VI. Revised Language/Descriptions for each Criteria VII. Technology 25% "w 1. Technology Viability: Proven, reliable system, 15% proven redundancy, product quality, potential for Technological advances, cost, and applicability Ow to District sites, etc.) M+ 2. Potential for technological advances, cost, and 10% applicability to District sites, etc.) Political viability (regulatory/political issues surrounding technology) Ow Vill. Environmental Impacts and Justice/Societal Benefits 25% Novi 1. Addresses several issues, including project siting. 15% Addresses the Social Justice Issue. Addresses odor issues, & public perception issue/local preference ,W issue.) Includes Trucks and Hauling Issues: Significant reduction in trucking. Amount of energy or fuel used for trucking. Covers whether this is the right thing to do.Will this option benefit society; how will it harm society; fairness; equity/equality, etc. �+ 2. Permitting:Addresses political, regulatory issues, 10% and water, air, soil and potential odor issues. Includes Technology's impact on Environment and public health). ,o, Includes Potential for Societal Harm and Public Health Effect (e.g. pathogens, spills, etc.) m+ IX. Project Team Capacity 20% 1. Financing Capability 10% 2. Project Experience: Includes Experience of vendor 5% and their technology such as design, construction WI+ and operation experience. Also includes health and safety record, non-compliance and criminal and financial disclosure. WMi 3. Project Schedule, milestones and deliverables 5% X. Economics/Total Life Cycle Costs 15% 1. Total Cost: Impact on Rate Payers Relative to 10% Other Proposals. The multiple ways things cost money—energy, transportation, personnel, equipment, time, land acquisition, etc. Includes unit cost to treat, handle and ship. 2. Capital Appreciation: Potential for Capital 5% Appreciation (Covers Energy Costs Over 20 or 30 years). Includes Life Cycle to the ratepayer "" and taxpayer. Lifetime cost to the ratepayer and tax payer. Potential for OCSD participation in capital appreciation. Benefits for capital or land UW appreciation to offset costs or part ownership in appreciating assets "g XI. Sustainability and Marketing Plans 15% W, 1. Product Marketing, marketing and good business 15% plans, contracts/letters of interest, size of markets, product compatibility, diversity of markets, cost UW sensitivity, reliable end users etc. This covers Viability of Market: Present and future market for the end product- given all the variables—political, environmental, societal, fiscal, etc.) tzli WW tow ow �+ Uft Summary of District Selection Criteria I. Summary of District's Evaluation Criteria (Phase 2) a. An Analysis of the Risks 40 points b. Total Life Cycle Costs 40 points '" C. Environmental Concerns 20 points km+ ll. Summary of OCSD's Nine (9) Criteria (Phase 1) Vendor Capacity 35 points a. Criteria 1: Project Experience 10 points b. Criteria 2: Project Team 10 points C. Criteria 3: Financing Capability 7.5 points d. Criteria 4: Project Schedule 7.5 points Also includes design, construction and operation experience. Also includes "insurance capabilities," health and safety record, non-compliance and criminal and financial disclosure. III. Siting/Location 30 points tame a. Criteria 5: Project Siting 15 points b. Criteria 6: Permitting and Site Viability 15 points ww IV. Technology Viability 10 points a. Criteria 7: Technology Viability 10 points ,OU (Environment and public health, proven, reliable system, proven redundancy, etc.) wo Seems to encompass product quality: Documentation from tests that the product is high quality. V. Product Marketing 15 points a. Criteria 8: Product Marketing, marketing plan, contracts/letters of interest, size of markets, w product compatibility, cost sensitivity) b. Criteria 9: Proportion of Capacity Already Filled �, Vendor Proposal Summary as of 1126/05 Est. Life Contract Total Cost Cycle Vendor Term Tonage (Ton a ($/Ton) Hauling Portion Variable Portion Cost ($/T) 40-N mg, McCarthy Family Farms 10 200 $89 24% 43% McCarthy Family Farms 10 300 $86 24,6 41% McCarthy Family Farms 10 400 $82 26% 40% McCarthy Family Farms 10 600 $77 27% 3 9%6 McCarthy Family Farms 20 2C0 $86 24% 44% 87 McCarthy Family Farms 20 300 $83 25% 42% McCarthy Family Farms 20 400 $79 27% 42% McCarthy Family Farms 20 600 $73 29% 42% ----------- IN I- I ............. Synagro (Biosolids Cake=18-22%) 10 200 $130 0 19% Synagro (Biosolids Cake=24-30%) 10 200 $117 0 26% Synagro (Biosolids Cake=18-22%) 20 200 $118 0 27% 100 Synagro (Biosolids Cake=24-30%) 20 200 $111 0 26% 7U77MM, . \i ammuRnza" -0 Enertech 10&20 50 $78 13% 14% Enertech 10&20 100 $74 12% 15% Enertech 10&20 200-800 $69 12% 16% 64 Enertech ($10 Million from OCSD) 10&20 50 $66 15% 17% Enertech ($10 Million from OCSD) 10&20 100 $62 15% 18% Enertech 0 Million from OCSD) 10&20 200-800 $58 14% 19% TPS 5 50 $56 32% 100% TPS 10 50 $55 33% 100% TPS 20 50 $53 34% 100% TPS 5 200-400 $48 38% 100% TPS 10 200-400 $45 40% 100% TPS 20 1 200-400 1 $44 41% 100% 72 t [ [ ! [ t [ t t Attachment 5 Summary Analysis of BAC Evaluations Technology/ Vendor Compost Production Dry Pellots,at plant Energy Production Heat Drying with 2 Soil Evaluation Factor (McCarthy Farms) (Synagro) (Enertech) E-fuel (TPS)Topsoil Viable, reliable, redundant. (36/1 1)x1 5=49.1 (49/12)xl5=61.2 (32/12)xl5=40.05 (32/12)xl5=43.65 Potential for advances, cost. (28/1 1)x 1 0=25.5 (39/12)x10=32.5 (42/12)xl0=35 (26.5/12)x10=24.1 Siting, social justice. (29/1 1)X 1 5=39.5 (43112)xl5=53.7 (37/12)xl5=46.2 (29/12)xl5=40.35 Permitting, political, regulatory. (31/1 1)x1 0=282 (36/12)x10=30 (42/12)xl5=35 (25/12)xl0=22.7 Financing capability. (35/11)x10=31.8 (42.5/11)x10=38.6 (39/1 1)x1 0=35.46 (38/11)x10=34.55 Project experience (38/1 1)x5=1 7.25 (46/12)x5=19.2 (29/12)x5=12.1 (25.5/12)x5=10.62 Project schedule. (30/1 1)x5=1 3.6 (31/12)x5=12.9 (31/12)x5=12.9 (23/1 1)x5=1 0.45 Total cost. (28111)x10=25.5 (29/12)x10=24.2 (44/12)xl0=36.7 (48.5/12)x10=40.42 Capital appreciation. (17/11)x5=7.75 (41/12)x5=17.1 (27/12)x5=11.25 (24/12)x5=10 Product marketing (30/11)x15=40.8 (47.5/12)xl5=59.4 (40/12)xl5=50 (27.5/12)xl5=34.38 Total Average Score 279 348.8 314.7 271.2 Standard Error +/- 10 (3.6%) +/-9.5 (2.7%) +/-10 (3.2%) +/-9.1 (3.4%) Rank by no. of votes: 1st. Synagro 3 8 1 2 2nd .EnerTech 1 3 6 2 3rd .McCarthy Farms 3 1 4 4 4th. TPS 4 0 1 4 a.d SUMMARY OF PROS AND CONS REGARDING VARIOUS BIOSOLIDS PROPOSALS February 9, 2005 And MCCARTHY FARMS Pros 1. Far from urban areas, 40 square mile site creates buffer 2. Extensive experience in biosolids management 3. Mature technology, low technological risk 4. Market for products on lands owned by McCarthy farms, but not fully defined in proposal • *Permitting seems manageable Good management team Cons 1. Could be regulated out of business by counties—high political risk 2. High "life cycle" cost (second highest cost) 3. Out-of-county operation, significant trucking 4. Increased reliance on composting in the San Joaquin Valley, reduces diversity in management of biosolids *Permitting not started, could be difficult • No environmental justice—exporting our problem • High water demand *Both a pro and con SYNAGRO Pros 1. Completes the environmental/biosolids processing cycle at OCSD 2. Extensive experience in biosolids management 3. In-county operation, reduced trucking 4. Mature technology, low technological risks • Strong financial capability; finance project construction costs • Market for product including local options • Creates diversity in OCSD's biosolids management • Addresses environmental justice concerns (local solution) Cons (Synagro con't) 1. Immediately adjacent to housing areas with potential significant environmental issues 2. Highest"life cycle" costs 3. Permitting not started; potentially significant hurdles from multi-agencies 4. Would require extensive local "out reach" program to work (what is the risk cost— �' minimum — preliminary design, do CEQA documentation — talking about $2 million and 2 years.) Public could kill the project at anytime really.) Sensitive to energy cost TPS Pros 1. Second lowest"life cycle" cost 2. Creates diversity in biosolids management 3. Technical process simple • Experience in marketing soil "' Construction requirements minimal • Good use of"heat"from another process • Experience in permitting issues relative to soil drying activities • Possibility of"back hauls"to Orange County Cons rd 1. Little to no experience in biosolids; May not be permitted to handle biosolids 2. Out-of-county option, no local preference, significant trucking 3. Intermittent plant operation 4. Responsiveness of TPS created some concern with OCSD team • Concerned that not all costs included in TPS proposal ,�, • Uncertain of future sustainability • No environmental justice • Future proximity to urban development ,., • Marketing plan incomplete • Declined to submit"best and final" offer ENERTECH Pros 1. Lowest"life cycle" cost 2. Regional solution to biosolids; supported by local government 3. Strong financial entities 4. Creates diversity in OCSD's biosolids handling • More local compared to other options • Project team will defined EIR is complete, permitting underway • Excellent/appropriate site for biosolids facility Cons 1. Minimal experience and maturity of the technology—never been scaled up in �.+ commercial production 2. Most complex technology compared to others 3. Potential concerns with environmental health (dioxin?) two 4. Energy costs intensive • Project contingent on other agency participants • Out-of-county option, no local preference, but closer to Orange County =0 imm ALTERNATIVE VIEWPOINT sod Deal Breakers and Show Stoppers. 1) RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 02-18-A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT iN SUPPORT OF M0 BIOSOLIDS RECYCLING... WHEREAS, the District desires to promote the continuance of the recycling of biosolids to nontable-food crop agriculture land in a manner that is safe, environmentally beneficial, and is sensitive to the needs of the communities involved. .� NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER: Section 1: "The District declares its full support for the recycling of biosolids. Section 2: "The District will use on its site, and encourage its Member Agencies to use at their facilities, compost made using Districts biosolids" The EnerTech (E-fuel) technology does NOT recycle biosolids, and does not comply with the policy stated in the above referenced resolution. 2) OCSD NPDES Permit No. CA0110604 BIOSOLIDS/SLUDGE REQUIREMENTS: States: "All biosolids generated by the discharger shall be used or disposed of in compliance with applicable portions of 40 CFR 257, 258, and 503 and any applicable portions of SWRCB Water Quality Order No. 2000-10-DWQ, General Waste Discharge Requirements for the Discharge of Biosolids to Land for use as a Soil Amendment in Agricultural, Silvercultural, Horicultural, and low Land Reclamation Activities" And "The discharger is responsible for assuring that all biosolids produced by OCSD's treatment facilities are disposed of in accordance with these rules," EnerTech may have all of their permits in place; however the OCSD NPDES permit does not state that they are permitted to dispose of biosolids by incineration, and this responsibility cannot be delegated to a vendor. Because of the restrictions placed upon the OCSD biosolids treatment and disposal program by the above referenced Resolution and NPDES Permit requirements, the EnerTech (E-fuel) proposal cannot be considered a viable biosolids disposal option for OCSD at the present time. Any effort by OCSD staff to attempt to revise or amend these restrictions is quite likely to receive opposition from either (or both) the Regional Water Quality Board (SARWQCB) �., and/or the environmental stakeholder community. BAC Vendor/Technology Evaluation Summary. These are the facts: 1) The Synagro proposal was clearly ranked by those participating in the BAC Vendor/Technology Evaluation Analysis as superior to the EnerTech proposal. 2) 8 of the 12 participating BAC members participating in the Vendor Technology tow Evaluation Analysis ranked Synagro as 1st, clearly a majority. Only 3 ranked EnerTech as 1st. 3) The technology evaluation parameters and weighting factors for this Evaluation Analysis were generated by a consensus of all of the BAC members. 4) Both the Staff Viable Technology Ranking Criteria Analysis and the BAC technology evaluation rank Heat Drying-Direct/Indirect (Dry Pellets) as the preferred biosolids technologies. 5) The OCSD staff Viable Technology Ranking Criteria Analysis ranks incineration (EnerTech) 14th out of 25 potential disposal technologies. 6) Disposal of biosolids by incineration is both inconsistent with the Board's stated policy of recycling in order to recover the beneficial nutrient content of class A biosolids, and is not permitted under the terms and conditions of their current NPDES permit. 7) OCSD staff is required to evaluate the vendor's proposals using the numeric criteria imd described in the RFP, independent of the BAC evaluation. Suggested Recommendations for the Board of Directors Consideration bmi 1) That OCSD contract with Synagro in the preparation of an EIR for the design and construction of an On-Site Pelletizer Dryer at Plant #2, and commence the permit aw process. 2) Contact McCarthy Farms and TPS, inform them of your decision, and thank them for taw their proposals. Provide them both with the summary list of CH2M Hill and TETRA TECH inc. comments, and suggest that should they choose to upgrade their facilities accordingly, OCSD would consider future (unsolicited) proposals for review from each of them. 3) In lieu of a contract commitment to EnerTech, OCSD should consider making available to them a low interest construction loan from our reserves. This may help LOW get their proposed facility up and on-line sooner, and provide OCSD with a form of low cost"insurance" in case of a loss of suitable biosolids disposal sites or a change in District policy and permit requirements. tuli 4) Staff should commence a search for alternate construction sites for a Pellitizer Dryer site within Orange County as a back-up to the proposed Plant#2 option. ar 5) OCSD should initiate a Federal legislation lobbying effort in order to attempt to reverse the Kern and King's county's pending legislation. 6) Board members should survey their respective Cities and Districts for suitable disposal sites, such as parks, golf courses, greenways or public lands, for application of class A biosolids from OCSD. 7) OCSD should initiate an aggressive public outreach and education activity, similar to the GRS project, in order to overcome the scientifically groundless and paranoid reluctance of some communities to accept the use and application of class A biosolids to agricultural lands. -� 8) New major property developments within the County should be required to use class A biosolids only on the community owned portion of the developed project. tow Opinion of Donald Schulz tow Wd UW LONG TERM Elements of a Biosolids Solution Una The 2004/5 BAC dealt with finding an interim solution for biosolids, not a true long term biosolids solution. The interim solution must be functional within two years, operate at least five and up to twenty years, and be able to accept 200 wet tons per day of km biosolids. The true long term biosolids solution could have a longer start up time, would operate indefinitely, and accept from none to all of the biosolids produced. The following are the elements that the BAC believes should be included in the proposals for the Long Term Biosolids solutions. These criteria will be used to evaluate the proposals along with the technical, financial, and other necessary components to No meet the needs of the district. The evaluation of any long term plan would utilize these elements and be included in the RFPs so the vendors know all the evaluation criteria. The elements or criteria often overlap depending upon one's perspective. For example, viability and sustainability include market, risk, regulation, financial, etc. while another viewpoint uses financial or risk as separate elements completely. No The BAC is not suggesting any particular means to accomplish these goals. The vendors will develop their own solutions to meet these criteria. told OCSD's Long Term Biosolids Plan should include the following elements: • Beneficial reuse — the more beneficial the better, complete utilization through tool organic reuse or energy production. • In-county option or, at least, regional operation UnLi • Environmentally sensitive— air, water, land, visual blight, road traffic, sound Reduce truck traffic, both number of trucks and distance traveled law Reduce energy consumption, i.e. electricity, heat, gasoline, etc. • Sustainable over the long term—operational, regulatory, marketability b=, Usable product with known long term markets, various markets • Viable—true long term utilization, meets current and future regulations ,m� Can obtain the necessary permits Meets neighbors concerns and neighborhood constraints ,W • Diversity—"Not put all our eggs in one basket." • Meets the needs of the community — provides beneficial solution to these needs LW Fertilizer, energy co-generation, etc • Reasonable cost(remember rate payers pay for this and it will be long term) twi • Variable amounts of biosolids can be accepted (from none to all produced) tolu WW