Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-04-28 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT April 22, 2004 she""' NOTICE OF MEETING (714)962-2411 fee: (714)9620366 www.xed.cem million address: BOARD OF DIRECTORS Po. H.812] ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Fountain valley.0 92]20 a12] aVaK addn.e: to944EllV Avenue roun WEDNESDAY, April 28, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 92 Valley.CA 7084019 Alemle Alexia, DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES • 10844 Ellis Avenue cities Fountain Valley, California 92708 Mahan, Brae Buena Park Fount. Min, The Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation Fullerton Gerden 3ra.e District will be held at the above location, time and date. Huntington Beech Irvine La Habra La Polmo L.Al..n.5 L'V✓,HBWPert Beach ornngn (fioard Secret ry Placonoe Senate Ann Saul Beach Scanlon Tuson Ville Perk rorta Linde OMTS COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 5, 2004 at 5:00 p.m. County of orange PDC COMMITTEE - Thursday, May 6, 2004 at 5:00 p.m. 9eeltery Districts GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT Coate Mesa SYSTEM STEERING COMMITTEE - Monday, May 10,2004 at 5:30 p.m. @OCWD MloWay cty Water Districts FAHR COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 12, 2004 at 5:00 p.m. 1'.no Pnnth STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 26, 2004 at 4:00 p.m. To mamwm world class leadership In wastewater,and water resource management. BOARD MEETING DATES Board Meeting May 26, 2004 June 23, 2004 *July 21, 2004 August 25, 2004 September 22, 2004 October 27, 2004 *November 17, 2004 *December 15, 2004 January 26, 2005 February 23, 2005 March 23, 2005 April 27, 2005 *Meetings are being held on the third Wednesday of the month KWepMdminffi�AgendaU004 Mee0ng NoUms\MN4.2.dm ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CERTIFICATION phone, (7141962-2411 lam (714)962-0355 sammi aed.eom mailing address: P.O. Boa 9127 Fomtain vainly.CA 92728-B127 moment address: 10844 Ellie Avenue Foantain valley.cA I hereby certify that at the regularly-scheduled and noticed meeting 9270E-7018 of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District on April 28, 2004, the following action was taken by the Board: Member Agendas MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the Cities General Manager to enter into an agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board for said Proposition 13 Watershed Protection Anaheim Grant, and to comply fully with the terms and conditions specified in the Beam Park grant agreement, in a form approved by General Counsel. Cypress Fomc FullertonVehey Garden Grove HunHngtan Beech Le Hehs La Palma Los Aiemites Dated: May 20, 2004 Ra, Beach Cre 91 ch p k Bea Penny M. Kyle, Board Secretary Placentia Orange Cou'rity Sanitation'District Sent.Aire Sea/Beach Scene. Tonto villa Perk lbrba Linda Co..,, e/ Orange Imiliary Districts Cosee M4aa Mdway Gty Water Districts /wine Ranch -re mawxw wand-class/ebderehmin wastewater end water resource mairegecahc" e April 28, 2004 SUMMARY UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UPDATE • OCSD has received two Notices of Violation from the Orange County Health Care Agency regarding underground storage tanks, one in November 2003, and one in April 2004. • The reason for the first Notice of Violation was due to a lack of performance by contractors hired to perform the required repairs and testing, and the failure of OCSD to centralize the effort to complete the repairs and testing. • The two areas cited in the second Notice of Violation were 1)the continued operation of four underground storage tanks at Plant 2 that were required to be placed into temporary closure, and 2) an inspection that revealed that monitoring sensors were not located in the correct location. • In response to the second Notice of Violation staff prepared a detailed action plan to remedy the noncompliance and met with Orange County Health Care Agency officials. • A Project Manager has been assigned to oversee the UST work. • An emergency contract has been awarded to repair the four underground storage tanks in question and temporary tanks have been setup to complete the temporary closure requirements. • OCSD staff will receive additional training for maintaining the sensors and equipment on underground storage tanks. • By May 7, 2004 OCSD is scheduled to be in full compliance with Orange County Health Care Agency requirements. The work on the remaining UST's has been scheduled to comply with the future deadlines. April 26, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors FROM: Blake P. Anderson General Manager SUBJECT: Underground Storage Tank Update California Senate Bill 989 (October 10, 1999) provided new underground storage tank (UST) regulations which required additional tank testing and repairs. The District had twenty underground storage tanks to test and repair. The District have received two Notices of Violation (NOV's) for failure to comply with the regulation. The two NOV's and staff actions will be reported on. The failure to comply with the regulations stem mainly from the selection of a contractor that did not perform in a timely manner, the need to designate a project manager to direct the project versus using a staff team approach, and the need for improved team communication concerning understanding project urgency and liability. Staff has prepared detailed plans that have been reviewed with the regulators. The District will be in compliance before May 7, 2004. On November 18, 2003, Orange County Health Care Agency(OCHCA) sent OCSD a Notice of Violation (NOV), attached, for noncompliance with the underground storage tank (UST) regulations at both treatment plants. OCSD staff responded and attempted to complete the repairs and the required testing that was originally due by March 31, 2003. The primary reasons for not meeting the March 31, 2003 deadline are: • Lack of performance by contractors hired to perform the required UST repair and testing. • Failure to centralize the effort to a designated project manager(the UST program was being managed by committee). Board of Directors Page 2 of 3 April 26, 2004 In response to the second NOV, staff prepared a detailed plan of action to remedy the noncompliance and prevent future noncompliance and met with OCHCA officials to discuss the plan on April 7, 2004. The action plan includes: 1) Designation of a Project Manager to oversee the UST work to provide leadership. 2) Removal of gasoline and diesel located at the Auto Shop area. Meet a future compliance deadline. 3) Removal and storage, in above ground tanks, of diesel fuel in the four USTs requiring repair at Plant No. 2 and repair of the piping, which is the subject for Board approval authorizing emergency repair and modifications to four underground storage tanks, Item 12 (c) on tonight's Board Agenda. 4) Adjusted fuel monitors to meet regulations and provide additional training regarding tampering of UST sensors. 5) Conversion of USTs in Temporary Closure to Permanent Closure status (this includes eight USTs, including the two in the Auto Shop area)to meet future compliance deadlines. OCSD was Issued a second NOV on April 5, 2004 for continued noncompliance. The second NOV, attached, was issued due to OCSD's failure to complete the required regulatory repairs and testing, and failure to complete the requirements for Temporary Closure for four USTs. OCHCA cited OCSD in two areas: (1)the continued operation of four USTs serving emergency generator equipment at Plant No. 2, that did not meet the temporary closure requirements and (2) a regulatory inspection revealing that UST monitoring sensors in several locations had been moved out of their required location, constituting "tampering' by reducing their ability to immediately detect a fuel release. The proposed work is proceeding on schedule. To date, • Mark Tomko, from Operations and Maintenance, has been designated to oversee the required UST repair and abandonment. Mark reports directly to the Operations and Maintenance Director on the UST issues. • The gasoline and diesel USTs In the Auto Shop area were removed on April 22, 2004. • A permit for above ground tanks at Plant No. 2 has been received from the Huntington Beach Fire Department. The tanks are currently in place and connected to the emergency generators, temporarily replacing the DST's that are being repaired. Diesel transfer to the above ground tanks will be completed the week of April 26, 2004. Other tank testing will be completed so compliance will ny Board of Directors Page 3 of 3 April 26, 2004 be complete. The repairs to the UST piping are scheduled to be completed by the end of June 2004. • Additional training classes for personnel who work with USTs are being prepared through OCSD's Human Resources Department with input from O&M's UST designated operator and ECM. • Permanent Closure applications have been accepted by OCHCA for two USTs, and applications are currently being prepared and submitted for the remaining six USTs to be abandoned/removed. $1.4 million has been budgeted in fiscal year 2004-2005 to continue repairs and upgrades on the remaining UST's. BPA:RB:wh HAdepftk620%GENERAL DATA\310\313\Memo\Di-RB Underground Storage Tank Update Board-04-04.doe Attachments (2) c: R.P. Ghirelli R.J. Ooten M. Moore COUNTY OF ORANGE JULIETTEA.POULSON,RN,MN E `,1VE7r;HEALTH CARE AGENCY DIRECTOR MIKE SPURGEON DEPUTY AGENCY DIRECTOR GnV ?1, ,;; REGULATORY HEALTH SERVICES REGULATORY HEALTH SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH STEVENK.WONG.REHS,MPH �+ DIRECTOR For,J[1 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ' �rr- WUNG ADDRESS: 7777 2M EAST EDINGER AVENUE 7 iylly SANTAANACA527a 70 TELEPHONE(714)SW� FAX(714)9724749 EMAIL: emlmmMalth®Ivx,pc,orvnpamus November 18,2003 CERTIFIED MAIL Mike Moore, Environmental and Compliance Monitoring Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708 SUBJECT: Notice of Violation for Underground Storage Tanks Located at 108" Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley and 22212 Brookhurst Street in Huntington Beach Dear Mr. Moore: On April 8, 2003 Pearl Boelter, Karen McKabney and Jeff Higbee of my staff met with Becky Brooks of your staff to discuss outstanding compliance issues for the underground storage tank systems located at the addresses stated above. In May of this year, a warning letter was sent to your facilities indicating that if the areas of noncompliance listed in inspection reports were not addressed, a permit to operate for the two sites would not be issued. Annual permits were not issued to the Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach UST facilities. Below is a summary of the outstanding compliance issues at these two sites by subject area. Specific violations with corrective actions have also been provided to your staff at onsite inspections. e SECONDARY CONTAINMENT TESTING REPAIRS At both the Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach sites there are still repairs ongoing in response to secondary containment testing. As you are aware,the secondary containment-testing deadline for all UST systems was December 31, 2002. The State Water Resources Control Board has indicated that all necessary repairs to secondary containment systems must be completed within a reasonable amount of time— 30 to 120 days. CUPA staff have been working with you or your facility representatives during 2003 in an effort to ensure that these repairs are made. However, your facility remains out of compliance with Sections 2631 and 2636 of Title 23, which are designed to among other things, protect the water resources of the County of Orange. The following options are available for the Orange County Sanitation District for bringing your tank facilities into compliance: Mike Moore, Environmental and Compliance Monitoring Manager Notice of Violation November 18, 2003 p Page 2 • Complete the repair of your secondary containment system based on modification plans approved by our Agency, and submit to our Agency retest results that show passage of your secondary system. • Submit plans to our Agency for temporary closure, proceed with the temporary closure process based on sections 2670 and 2671 of Title 23, and complete the necessary repairs to your secondary containment system. • Submit plans to our Agency for permanent closure, and proceed with the removal of the tank systems based on Sections 2670 and 2672 of Title 23. TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEMS _ At the Fountain Valley facility,the following UST systems have not completed the temporary closure requirements: 1. Blower Building Two 15,000 gallon diesel USTs 2. Fleet Maintenance One 12,000 gallon unleaded UST Please complete temporary closure requirements for these USTs pursuant to sections 2670 and 2671 of Title 23. ANNUAL CERTIFICATIONS OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEMS On March 7, 2003, the UST systems at Fountain Valley were certified by an approved contractor. The certification found that many probes were incompatible with the existing monitoring systems. On October 21, 2003 we received documentation that new probes were installed. However, State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) documents to verify retesting of the probes were not submitted. Sensors at the Huntington Beach facility were also found to be incompatible. Documentation was received that they were replaced but no certification of probes was done. Please submit to our Agency SWRCB documents to verify that the monitoring systems are fully operational. I am concerned that the Orange County Sanitation District continues to operate many of their USTs without permits. Operating a UST without a permit to operate, in violation of H&S Section 25284(a)(1) and is punishable by a fine of up to $5,000.00 per day, per UST. Please contact Pearl Boelter of my staff at (714) 667-3629 to set up a meeting to discuss these issues. Sinc y Denise Fennessy ogram Ivf ger Environment ealth Cc: Bruce Chapman, Orange County Sanitation Districts Becky Brooks, Orange County Sanitation Districts COUNTY OF ORANGE JULIETTE A. POULSON, RN, MN HEALTH CARE AGENCY DIRECTOR MIKE SPURGEON DEPUTY AGENCY DIRECTOR REGULATORY HEALTH SERVICES REGULATORY HEALTH SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH STEVEN K.WONG,REHS,MPH DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Excellence ENVIRONMENTAL AOORESS: lht yity M"EAST EDINGER AVENUE SANTA ANA.CA 92r06Ar20 Jrlyice TELEPHONE:(714)667J600 FA%:(714)9T2-0r46 E# IL: enWonl,w61�0ea.m.onnga.a.0 April 5, 2004 Blake Anderson, General Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 SUBJECT: Second Notice of Violation for Underground Storage Tanks Located at 10844 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley and 22212 Brookhurst Street in Huntington Beach Dear Mr. Anderson: On November 18, 2003, Orange County Environmental Health (OCEH) sent Orange County Sanitation Districts' (OCSD) Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Manager, Michael Moore, a Notice of Violation for outstanding underground storage tank (UST) violations at both your Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach sites. Please see the attached copy of the November I8"'NOV. A response from Mr. Moore dated November 26, 2003, stated that all items listed in the NOV were scheduled to be completed by December 15, 2003. This date has passed and now three months later, OCSD continues with its noncompliant status with no plan for immediate correction. Several OCSD tanks have now been without a permit since July 2003. The operation of unpermitted tanks is a very serious violation of State regulations. In addition to these ongoing compliance issues, a recent inspection at the Fountain Valley site revealed new violations that will also be addressed in this NOV due to their serious nature. Below is a summary of the outstanding compliance issues at these two sites by subject area Specific violations with corrective actions have also been provided to your staff at onsite and follow-up inspections. SECONDARY CONTAINMENT TESTING REPAIRS Power Building C: 1 - 8,000 gallon diesel tank Power Building D: I - 12,000 gallon diesel tank Emergency Power Building: 2 - 15,000 gallon tanks At the above listed Huntington Beach USTs, repairs are still ongoing in response to secondary containment testing. The secondary containment-testing deadline for all UST systems was December 31, 2002. The State Water Resources Control Board has indicated that all necessary repairs to secondary containment systems must be completed within a reasonable amount of time — 30 to 120 days. Environmental Health staff have been working with your facility representatives for several years in an effort to ensure that these repairs are made. However, Blake Anderson,General Manager Second Notice of Violation April 5, 2004 f Page 2 your facility remains out of compliance with Sections 2631 and 2636 of Title 23, which are designed to among other things,protect the water resources of the County of Orange. On 12/31/03, OCSD submitted temporary closure plans for these four tanks. A recent inspection by Jeff Nofal of my staff noted that fuel is still in the USTs, which is in violation of temporary closure requirements found in Sections 2670 and 2671 of Title 23. OCSD must meet temporary closure requirements and find alternative means of storing fuel until the repair process is complete. Conversations with your staff member Becky Brooks indicated that the repairs on these USTs will take until June to complete and you will be using these tanks throughout the repair process. The use of underground storage tanks while under temporary closure is not allowed and is a violation of State regulations. ANNUAL CERTIFICATIONS OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEMS On March 22, 2004, Karen McKabney of my staff inspected the OCSD site in Fountain Valley. She noted that the monitoring probes in the 15,000-gallon diesel UST in Building 4 and the 2000-gallon waste oil UST in the Central Generator Building were raised above the liquid level so as not to detect a release. The raising of probes is a serious violation as it demonstrates an intentional attempt to disable the monitoring system from detecting releases from these UST systems. There are other options available in order to meet UST compliance requirements and to continue the operations of the Orange County Sanitation District. These options have been discussed with your staff. Many UST facilities throughout Orange County, including government owned sites, have implemented these various options. Your continued operation of these unpermitted tanks threatens the water resources of Orange County, which your agency strives to protect; and is unfair to the many businesses and agencies that spent a great deal of funding to come into compliance by the State deadline. Operating a UST without a permit to operate is a violation of H&S Section 25284(a)(1) and is punishable by a fine of up to $5,000.00 per day, per UST. Please contact me at (714) 667-3780 to set up a meeting to discuss these issues and to develop an acceptable compliance timeline. Sincerely, Denise Fennessy, rogram Man er Environmental. alth Cc: R.P. Ghirelli, D.Env., Orange County Sanitation District Bruce Chapman, Orange County Sanitation District Becky Brooks, Orange County Sanitation District 2 a B• S MTO WMe CAPITOLSTATE oOMlii ACMEMNETO,,CA Baa" µ ♦ M-nyµStat— nµeHte a . I 191a446.49a1 M9RNMENT AL ORoaNrsanon .141MC1 ME SENATOR 9reuRANce I a.aa MAC ARTMUR BLVD. eU.. SUITE395 ROSS JOHNSON IRVINC CA 92612 JOINT COMMIi}Be ON RULER (949)833 DIED THIRTY-FIFTH SENATORIAL DISTRICT (714)6303s 4 190012212225 I ' April 26, 2004 Shirley McCracken, Chair Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Dear Ms. McCracken: As a longtime advocate of groundwater storage, I am pleased that construction of the Groundwater Replenishment System has begun, and that Orange County will soon reap the benefits of Increased groundwater storage. I have been Informed that the construction bids for the GW R System came in substantially higher than expected. While I am disappointed at the increase in budget, it's my understanding that this is directly related to the increased price of steel Internationally. I am confident that the Orange County Water District and the Orange County Sanitation District will work to control the budget on the other areas of the project, and to take advantage of the fact that the other components of the GW R System construction have all come in well under budget. I believe that groundwater storage is critical to ensure our continued supply of quality, locally controlled water for Orange County. I encourage you to keep moving forward to build the GWR System. 'Srin�cce,. ',rrelyy,, inqV Ross Joh sort n State Senator, 35th District 0 William A. Shane 19352 Sierra Calmo Road Irvine,CA 92612 April 26,2004 Shirley McCracken Chair Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Director McCracken: I recently read in the Orange County Register that the Sanitation board intends to vote on a bid for the Groundwater Replenishment System. I would like to express my personal support for the System and ask the Board of the Orange County Sanitation District to move forward as quickly as possible with its construction. As an Irvine resident and long time community leader, I know the importance of this plan for Orange County's future. The Groundwater Replenishment System will help ensure Orange County is drought-proof and will give us more local control of our water in the coming years. Sincere�l �y, //9 C j Bill Shane O 3 Maternal outreach lYl]�/�nnngernentV(� ystem April 26, 2004 Shirley McCracken Chair Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Director McCracken: I read in the Orange County Register(Pricier Steel Adds $33 Million to Wastewater Project Tab, April 22, 2004)that your board plans to vote this week on a contract for the Groundwater Replenishment System. I would like to convey our support for the System and ask the Board of the Orange County Sanitation District to move forward with its construction. This project will help drought-proof Orange County, giving us more local control of our water. The Groundwater Replenishment System will significantly enhance our water supply system. The Maternal Outreach Management System has supported this project, and we look forward to its prompt construction and initiation in the near future. Sincerely, Pam Pimentel Executive Director Maternal Outreach Management System 1212 N.Broadway Street,Suite 212 Santa Ana,CA 92701 • E-mail:ppimentel@oc-moms.org (714) 972-2610 1-800-787-5858 • Fax(714) 972-2620 k� �6t �Ri April 25, 2004 Shirley McCracken Chair Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Director McCracken: As President of the Black Chamber of Commerce of Orange County, I wanted to write to you today in support of the Groundwater Replenishment System. This System will truly benefit the people of Orange County by providing an efficient, plentiful source of water. The water generated by the system will also be highly safe, clean and pure. The Groundwater Replenishment System will provide an excellent supplemental source of water for Orange County. The Black Chamber of Commerce has endorsed the System as an important part of Orange County's water supply for the future, and we hope you proceed with this project as soon as possible. I am also glad to have read your"Reader Rebuttal" in the Orange County Register today. I am glad to see you and the board are committed to clean beaches, clean water and a healthy environment, of which, we are here to support your efforts. SiecDona Bo President Black Chamber of Commerce of Orange County 2323 N. Broadway Suite 330 Santa Ana,CA.92706(714)547-2648-fax www.ocblackchamber.com Santa Ana Education Foundation "lrs All About The Kids' April 26, 2004 Shirley McCracken Chair Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Director McCracken: On behalf of the Santa Ana Education Foundation, I would like to take this opportunity to express our support for the Groundwater Replenishment System. The need for new water in Orange County has grown dramatically in recent years, and our local water agencies are counting on projects like the Groundwater Replenishment System to help ensure future water reliability. This project is also good for the environment and sends less water to the ocean. We support the Groundwater Replenishment System, and we feel the sooner it is implemented,the better for Orange County and for Southern California as a whole. We encourage the OCSD Board to move forward with this project. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, ,p ' Bernedette Medrano Executive Director Santa Ana Education Foundation Post Office Box 10134 Santa Ana,CA 92711-0134 Tel: 714 639 9505 Cell: 714 458 1244 Fax: 714 633 3056 Email: sae(bsa,@sbcglobal.nel Websile: w .saedloundatiw.org <hltp://Ww .saedfoundation.orgh T FILIPINO AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF ORANGE COUNTY www.FACCOC.ORG April 26, 2004 Shirley McCracken Chair Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Director McCracken: As President of the Filipino American Chamber of Commerce of Orange County, I wanted to write to you today in support of the Groundwater Replenishment System. This System will truly benefit the people of Orange County by providing an efficient, plentiful source of water. The water generated by the system will also be highly safe, clean and pure. The Groundwater Replenishment System will provide an excellent supplemental source of water for Orange County. The Filipino American Chamber of Commerce has endorsed the System as an important part of Orange County's water supply for the future, and we hope you proceed with this project as soon as possible. Sincerely, �c Linda mo, Esq. President Filipino American Chamber of Commerce of Orange County 215 E.ORANGEMORPE AVE.,a288•FULLERTON,CA 92832-3017.714.280.4729•FAX 714.525.0209•FAx 562.860.6171 M u Icicultu ral In siliute for Leadership Finding onmmmm. a.rne.•s April 26, 2004 Shirley McCracken Chair Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Director McCracken: My name is Lucia de Garcia, President and Founder of the Multicultural Institute for Leadership. I wanted to write to you today in support of the Groundwater Replenishment System. This System will truly benefit all the people in Orange County by providing an efficient, plentiful source of water. The water generated by the system will also be highly safe, clean and pure. The Groundwater Replenishment System will provide an excellent supplemental source of water for Orange County. I have endorsed this System as an important part of Orange County's water supply for the future, and we hope you proceed with this project as soon as possible. Sincerely, Lucia ia President Multicultural Institute for Leadership t GARY O.MILLER 1m>Lo.aa.Neuse o�®a.n.wr awpmee.,carom Wwe ..W.,OC20Bf6 i Tel(202)226-92W ABBISTANTWHIPATUROE F.vc(2m)zz8 w2 COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES 1000 Ewer LA..e sown,earn le0 UNITED STATES ae"CA�' Tel 14 25]-IM COM AND NONTRANSPOF6 TON House OF REPREsENTATIvEs F. >f4 257-6242 FRASTRUCTUBUILDING A BErTEN"ERICA CAUCUS, M,y 211 yy ccamm f GIABMAN April 27.2004 Tel tmsl aToaeea Shirley McCracken Chair Orange County Sanitaton District 108441311is Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708-7018 Dear Director McCracken, I write to reiterate my strong support for the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System, sponsored by the Orange County Water District and the Orange County Sanitation District. I sin delighted that the GWR System is under construction, bringing us closer to the reality of a safer, more reliable water supply for Orange County. The GWR System, which is the largest and most advanced water reclamation project In the country, is vitally important to help meet the needs of a growing population. With increased demand, decreased availability of imported water and higher water quality requirements,future water supplies will become even more limited and expensive. The only way to address this impending crisis is to eroato a new water source for Orange County. The GWA System will create a new water supply of 72,000 aero foot per year,directly benefiting north and central Orange County's 2.3 million residents. Upon completion, Orange County will be less dependent on costly imported water and less vulnerable to instability of supply due to varying precipitation levels. in addition,the process of advanced treatment with microfilredon,reverse osmosis, ultraviolet light and hydrogen peroxide will produce water of a higher quality than sources currently used to recharge the groundwater basin. While the federal authorization for this project is currently only $20 million, I understand the importance of creating that the federal government adequately supplement state and local resources during construction. Therefore, I have requested a federal appropriation of$7 million for Fiscal Year 2005. Although the appropriations process is not yet complete,you can be assured that I will continue to advocate for federal support for the GWR System as Congress makes final decisions regarding funding allocations for water projects. The GWR System is vital to Orange County's future water supply, and I look forward to continuing our partnership to ensure that this project receives the finding it needs to become a reality. Sincerely, I�V,4 GARY G.MILLER Member of Congress mk.eoory neccuoracew Received 04-28-04 01:52pm From-714 257 9242 To-CUD Paso 002 ti2oq S aca t oA 154004zc /K• pa(_pc¢s f49Z Rater Environment C a l i f o r n i a FWater ederation Environment PreservingfiEnbancusg I Association the Global lKfrter Fiwirommnt Water Environment Federation and the California Water Environment Association Present CONTROL OF FATS, OILS, & GREASE (FOG) ADVANCED TRAINING COURSE June 15 & 16, 2004 Atrium Hotel Irvine, California Supported in cooperative agreement by US Environmental Protection Agency—Office of Water �= EPA 0 TRAINING COURSE r (This course has limited space. -Please Register Early- Please do not make travel arrangements until registration is confirmed.) CONTROL OF FATS, OILS, & GREASE ADVANCED TRAINING COURSE COURSE DESCRIPTION FACULTY Over the last few years, WEF, in partnership with Jack Dickinson, City of San Jose the US EPA, has developed a Fats, Oils, and Roy Henvig, Brown and Caldwell Grease Control Training Course and has been Leon Holt, Town of Cary, NC conducting workshops at various locations across John Parnell, PhD, City of St Petersburg the country. After the success of this Introductory John Shaffer, Environmental Engineering and FOG Control course, WEF has developed an Contracting, Inc. advanced FOG training. Utilizing the knowledge of EPA Region 9 Speaker to be Announced experts already involved in the control of fats,oils, and grease, this new course presents HOTEL INFORMATION implementation details for a vanetyof FOG control Atrium Hotel options for fats, oils, and grease. 18700 MacArthur Boulevard Irvine, CA 92612 The purpose of the training course is to present a www.atrumhotel.com well developed approach that can be used by Reservations: 1.800.854.3012 utilities to design and implement their own site- Rates: $84 Single/Double specific FOG control programs for preventing or Workshop rooms will be honored on a space- eliminating the entry of FOG into the collection available basis through May 31, 2004. After this system. date, workshop rates cannot be guaranteed. Please call early to obtain the workshop rate and AGENDA be sure to mention WEF/C WEA to obtain this Dav l rate. Registration: 7:30 a.m. - 8:30 a.m. Parking: Self-parking is available at the cost of Course: 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. $7.00 per night with in and out privileges. Dav 2 Course: 8:30 a.m. -5:00 p.m. CONTACT HOURS WEF will issue a Certificate of Attendance to COURSE FEE includes course materials as well each full workshop participant for 12 contact as continental breakfast, coffee breaks and hours (1.2 CEUs). lunch each day. UPCOMING EDUCATIONAL EVENTS Advance Rate: On or before 5/7/2004 WEF Collection Systems 2004: Innovative Approaches to Collection Systems Member $260 Nonmember $360 Management Midwest Airlines Center Onsite Rate: On orAfter5/10/2004 Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA Member $290 Nonmember $385 August 8-11, 2004 CWEA Northern Regional Training REGISTRATION DEADLINE Conference, September 12-14, 2004, Sparks, Your registration form must be received via Nevada telephone, fax or mail at WEF no later than close of business on Friday, June 4, 2004 or you will Tri-State Seminar, September 23-25, 2004, need to register onsite. Primm, Nevada r ADVANCED FOG CONTROL TRAINING COURSE MODULES , Introduction/Overview Design Issues • Assuring effective grease Marketing of Your Grease Control trap/interceptor design Program • Sample collection Convincing your administration and • Alternative Methods: Generation and stakeholders that they need an Oil & Interception Grease Control Program Operation & Maintenance Issues Permits . Grease trap and interceptor MOM • Identifying and classifying sources Ensuring the use of reputable waste • Developing a permitting process haulers • Confirming that FOG wastes are Legal Authority properly disposed of • Writing good sewer use ordinances . Lateral cleaning issues —Who's and grease control regulations responsible for the grease? • Sample ordinances from several • Vapor hood cleaning successful programs Additives Enforcement • Pros/Cons • Violation recognition Case studies • Enforcement response guide Research Report • Enforcement documents • Fines & penalties Grease Control Program Record- keeping/Information Management Oil & Grease Management • Integrating Oil & Grease Program Identifying grease creators information into Collection Systems • Pollution prevention databases/information systems Permitting and inspection • Tracking the effectiveness of your Disposal and containment FOG Control Program Effective Inspection Training Success Stories • Reviewing current regulations Additional Resources for Implementing • Inspection techniques Grease Control Programs • Gathering Facility Operational Data • Completing Inspection Forms Summary Conducting follow-up - communicating inspection concerns and recommendations FOG COURSE REGISTRATION FORM Irvine, California—June 15 & 16, 2004 Registration Instructions Please send me WEF membership information_ Complete the registration form below. Payment must accompany registration forms. (Photocopies of checks are not acceptable.) Make checks payable to Water Environment Federation. Approved US government purchase orders must accompany the registration form. Government purchase orders are not accepted on-site. To Register By Fax: (credit card & government purchase orders only) 1-703-684-2471 By Phone (credit card payments only) 1-800-666.0206 (select menu option #2) (Outside the United States or Canada) 1-703-684-2452 By Mail (Check, credit card, Government Purchase Order)to: Registration Coordinator Water Environment Federation 601 Wythe Street Alexandria, VA 2 231 4-1 9 94 PLEASE CHECK ONE WEF or CWEA Member ID# (For member rate.) Advance Rate: On or Before May 7, 2004 O Member $260 ONonmember$360 F0G2-04 Onsite Rate: On or After May 10, 2004 D Member $290 ❑Nonmember$385 Important Note: Your registration form must be received via telephone,fax or mail at WEF no later than close of business on Friday,June 4, 2004 or you will need to register onsite. All cancellations must be submitted in writing to WEF on or before Friday,June 4, 2004 to receive a full refund Last Name First Name Organization Address City State Zip Code Telephone Fax Email Total Payment(must accompany form) Method of Payment: ❑ Government PO (Po) PO No. ❑ Company Check(C) Check No. ❑ Personal Check (P) Check No. ❑ AMEX ❑ Master Card D VISA Credit Card Number Expiration Date Signature I authorize WEF to charge my credit card for the amount listed above. � h L. p IJ NE EMN� April 26, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors FROM: Bob Dolan �1.0M Director of Operations & Maintenance SUBJECT: Level of Secondary Treatment and Disinfection Progress Data on the level of treatment progress and its impacts on the final effluent are attached. Historical trends for final effluent percent of secondary treatment for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)and total suspended solids (TSS) are shown. In addition, current monthly data for BOD, TSS and disinfection effectiveness are shown on a schematic of the treatment system. Secondary Treatment Standards Update All operationally available secondary treatment facilities are online. Staff continues to make in-plant adjustments and improvements to existing processes to advance toward secondary treatment standards. The final effluent is a blend of 69% secondary treatment and 31% primary treatment, which is above our target of 64% secondary treatment. During the 12 months prior to the Board's decision of July 17, 2002, the District's final effluent quality averaged 51 ppm TSS and 72 ppm BOD. During March 2004, the final of effluent averaged 37 ppm TSS and 63 ppm BOD versus the secondary treatment goal is 30 ppm TSS and BOD. The final effluent TTS and BOD is up slightly due to several construction projects that have taken facilities off line. These projects impacts will end in March 2004. We expect to consistently achieve secondary treatment standards by December 2012 when all of new facilities are constructed and placed into service. Disinfection Update Our final effluent continues to be successfully disinfected using the temporary facility disinfection system,which has now been in operation since August 2002. The disinfection system is significantly reducing the total coliform, fecal coliform, enterococci bacteria and viruses. March 2004 results for total coliform averaged about 7,220 MPN/100 mL, which is substantially below the final effluent goal of 180,000 MPN/100mL. There were two days in early April the District had excursion above the total coliform goal of 180,000 MPN/100ml. The excursion were less than two hours. When excursion exceed four hours ocean monitoring and sampling would have occurred. OCS9 PO 81V F.Vc PP IV (7141=4411 Page 2 Apn126, 2004 The excursion occurred during contractor shutdowns. Staff did not correctly effect disinfection during these incidents. Staff analysis of the events will lead to improved disinfection during future shutdowns. The final effluent had a maximum 0.22 ppm chlorine residual averaged over eight hours on one day, which is well below the 1.45 ppm daily maximum compliance limit. Additional disinfection data is reported on the Web @ www.ocsd.com. RJO:jmf h:tdepA=N8101finaMolboard of directoms board handoutsW-21-04Moard packet cover letter4-21-04)jtdoe Attachments (2) Orange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels PO b Revision 4-21-04 FINAL EFFLUENT MONTHLY DATA PERCENT SECONDARY TREATMENT w w >n w w w w w w WInMr 2002 owl>=ga as w w w M Mq +n JW J�P N m w m wn Pw My �m am TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS CUSS) BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND SOD) IN FINAL EFFLUENT IN FINAL EFFLUENT 1998 Pemal Limo=100 ppm e P^ m P a w PiPI eta 7998 PonnN Limk:SD Dpm a a a a m m a a a m >+ a m a a Secondary Standard Goal=30 ppm m Smntlary Slardartl Goal=30 ppm o P Ip lay Ayl Jul Iaq ap m Nw b0 M Pa WI PPf Nq M 3L Iy YP m Nw p0 Jq PM M. am aM EOl as Orange County Sanitation District Operational Treatment Levels Fiscal Year 2001-02 Ending June 2002 Progress to Secondary Standards (Prior to July 17, 2002 Board decision) Month: March 2004 47% 31% Ocean Pipeline Ocean Pipeline wm wai. DIaNM1atlena M,®e MiW Gchlarinaaan - •� 53% 69% �'�_ Secondary Final Effluent t BOD = 72 ppm TSS = 51 ppm Bacteria Reduction: 99.999+% Goal:99.3% Reduction Ocean Discharge Chlorine Limit Chlorine Level Permit Limit: Daily Maximum:1.45 ppm Daily Maximum:0.22 ppm BOD = 100 ppm (Average of 8 Samples) TSS = 60 ppm Final Effluent: Final Effluent Goal: BOD= 63 ppm BOD = 30 ppm TSS = 37 ppm TSS = 30 ppm a 4 April 28, 2004 SUMMARY UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK UPDATE • OCSD has received two Notices of Violation from the Orange County Health Care Agency regarding underground storage tanks, one in November 2003, and one in April 2004. • The reason for the first Notice of Violation was due to a lack of performance by contractors hired to perform the required repairs and testing, and the failure of OCSD to centralize the effort to complete the repairs and testing. • The two areas cited in the second Notice of Violation were 1) the continued operation of four underground storage tanks at Plant 2 that were required to be placed into temporary closure, and 2) an inspection that revealed that monitoring sensors were not located in the correct location. • In response to the second Notice of Violation staff prepared a detailed action plan to remedy the noncompliance and met with Orange County Health Care Agency officials. • A Project Manager has been assigned to oversee the UST work. • An emergency contract has been awarded to repair the four underground storage tanks in question and temporary tanks have been setup to complete the temporary closure requirements. • OCSD staff will receive additional training for maintaining the sensors and equipment on underground storage tanks. • By May 7, 2004 OCSD is scheduled to be in full compliance with Orange County Health Care Agency requirements. The work on the remaining UST's has been scheduled to comply with the future deadlines. April 26, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors FROM: Blake P. Anderson General Manager SUBJECT: Underground Storage Tank Update California Senate Bill 989 (October 10, 1999) provided new underground storage tank (UST) regulations which required additional tank testing and repairs. The District had twenty underground storage tanks to test and repair. The District have received two Notices of Violation (NOV's)for failure to comply with the regulation. The two NOV's and staff actions will be reported on. The failure to comply with the regulations stem mainly from the selection of a contractor that did not perform in a timely manner, the need to designate a project manager to direct the project versus using a staff team approach, and the need for improved team communication concerning understanding project urgency and liability. Staff has prepared detailed plans that have been reviewed with the regulators. The District will be in compliance before May 7, 2004. On November 18, 2003, Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) sent OCSD a Notice of Violation (NOV), attached, for noncompliance with the underground storage tank (UST) regulations at both treatment plants. OCSD staff responded and attempted to complete the repairs and the required testing that was originally due by March 31, 2003. The primary reasons for not meeting the March 31, 2003 deadline are: • Lack of performance by contractors hired to perform the required UST repair and testing. • Failure to centralize the effort to a designated project manager (the UST program was being managed by committee). i Board of Directors Page 2 of 3 April 26, 2004 In response to the second NOV, staff prepared a detailed plan of action to remedy the noncompliance and prevent future noncompliance and met with OCHCA officials to discuss the plan on April 7, 2004. The action plan includes: 1) Designation of a Project Manager to oversee the UST work to provide leadership. 2) Removal of gasoline and diesel located at the Auto Shop area. Meet a future compliance deadline. 3) Removal and storage, in above ground tanks, of diesel fuel in the four USTs requiring repair at Plant No. 2 and repair of the piping, which is the subject for Board approval authorizing emergency repair and modifications to four underground storage tanks, Item 12 (c) on tonight's Board Agenda. 4) Adjusted fuel monitors to meet regulations and provide additional training regarding tampering of UST sensors. 5) Conversion of USTs in Temporary Closure to Permanent Closure status (this includes eight USTs, including the two in the Auto Shop area)to meet future compliance deadlines. OCSD was issued a second NOV on April 5, 2004 for continued noncompliance. The second NOV, attached, was issued due to OCSD's failure to complete the required regulatory repairs and testing, and failure to complete the requirements for Temporary Closure for four USTs. OCHCA cited OCSD in two areas: (1) the continued operation of four USTs serving emergency generator equipment at Plant No. 2, that did not meet the temporary closure requirements and (2) a regulatory inspection revealing that UST monitoring sensors in several locations had been moved out of their required location, constituting 'tampering" by reducing their ability to immediately detect a fuel release. The proposed work is proceeding on schedule. To date, • Mark Tomko, from Operations and Maintenance, has been designated to oversee the required UST repair and abandonment. Mark reports directly to the Operations and Maintenance Director on the UST issues. • The gasoline and diesel USTs in the Auto Shop area were removed on April 22, 2004. • A permit for above ground tanks at Plant No. 2 has been received from the Huntington Beach Fire Department. The tanks are currently in place and connected to the emergency generators, temporarily replacing the DST's that are being repaired. Diesel transfer to the above ground tanks will be completed the week of April 26, 2004. Other tank testing will be completed so compliance will Board of Directors Page 3 of 3 Apri126. 2004 be complete. The repairs to the UST piping are scheduled to be completed by the end of June 2004. Additional training classes for personnel who work with USTs are being prepared through OCSD's Human Resources Department with input from O&M's UST designated operator and ECM. Permanent Closure applications have been accepted by OCHCA for two USTs, and applications are currenfly being prepared and submitted for the remaining six USTs to be abandoned/removed. e $1.4 million has been budgeted in fiscal year 2004-2005 to continue repairs and upgrades on the remaining UST's. BPA:RB:wh H:WepNSW ()%GENERAL DATAW10W73WemoZI-RB_undwg=nd Storage Tank Update_Board-0/-06.dx Attachments (2) c: R.P. Ghirelli R.J. Ooten M. Moore COUNTY OF ORANGE JULIETTEA. POULSON, RN,MN e " HEALTH CARE AGENCY DIRECTOR - , - - _ " -' -' MIKE SPURGEON DEPUTY AGENCY DIRECTOR REGULATORY HEALTH SERVICES REGULATORY HEALTH SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH STEVEN K WONG,REHS,MPH DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH , � II�IVI`.f• IM UNG ADDRESS: ZOOS EAST EDa1GER AVENUE 19/f01%l)' SANTAANACA52T0 72) TELEPH E'(/14)6157 D FAX'(714)972-0749 E-MAR: emimnMN11iQ1o.caaMWraus November 18, 2003 CERTIFIED MAEL Mike Moore, Environmental and Compliance Monitoring Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 SUBJECT: Notice of Violation for Underground Storage Tanks Located at 10844 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley and 22212 Brookhurst Street in Huntington Beach Dear Mr.Moore: On April 8, 2003 Pearl Boelter, Karen McKabney and Jeff Higbee of my staff met with Becky Brooks of your staff to discuss outstanding compliance issues for the underground storage tank systems located at the addresses stated above. In May of this year, a warning letter was sent to your facilities indicating that if the areas of noncompliance listed in inspection reports were not addressed, a permit to operate for the two sites would not be issued. Annual permits were not issued to the Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach UST facilities. Below is a summary of the outstanding compliance issues at these two sites by subject area. Specific violations with corrective actions have also been provided to your staff at onsite inspections. - SECONDARY CONTAINMENT TESTING REPAIRS At both the Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach sites there are still repairs ongoing in response to secondary containment testing. As you are aware,the secondary containment-testing deadline for all UST systems was December 31, 2002. The State Water Resources Control Board has indicated that all necessary repairs to secondary containment systems must be completed within a reasonable amount of time—30 to 120 days. CUPA staff have been working With you or your facility representatives during 2003 in an effort to ensure that these repairs are made. However, your facility remains out of compliance with Sections 2631 and 2636 of Title 23, which are designed to among other things, protect the water resources of the County of Orange. The following options are available for the Orange County Sanitation District for bringing your tank facilities into compliance: - Mike Moore,Environmental and Compliance Monitoring Manager Notice of Violation November 18, 2003 y Page 2 • Complete the repair of your secondary containment system based on modification plans approved by our Agency, and submit to our Agency retest results that show passage of your secondary system. • Submit plans to our Agency for temporary closure, proceed with the temporary closure process based on sections 2670 and 2671 of Title 23, and complete the necessary repairs to your secondary containment system. • Submit plans to our Agency for permanent closure, and proceed with the removal of the tank systems based on Sections 2670 and 2672 of Title 23. TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEMS At the Fountain Valley facility,the following UST systems have not completed the temporary closure requirements: 1. Blower Building Two 15,000 gallon diesel USTs 2. Fleet Maintenance One 12,000 gallon unleaded UST Please complete temporary closure requirements for these USTs pursuant to sections 2670 and 2671 of Title 23. ANNUAL CERTIFICATIONS OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEMS On March 7, 2003, the UST systems at Fountain Valley were certified by an approved contractor. The certification found that many probes were incompatible with the existing monitoring systems. On October 21, 2003 we received documentation that new probes were installed. However, State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) documents to verify retesting of the probes were not submitted. Sensors at the Huntington Beach facility were also found to be incompatible. Documentation was received that they were replaced but no certification of probes was done. Please submit to our Agency SWRCB documents to verify that the monitoring systems are fully operational. I am concerned that the Orange County Sanitation District continues to operate many of their USTs without permits. Operating a UST without a permit to operate, in violation of H&S Section 25284(a)(1) and is punishable by a fine of up to $5,000.00 per day, per UST. Please contact Pearl Becher of my staff at (714) 667-3629 to set up a meeting to discuss these issues. Since Y Denise Fenn-Say rogram M'at ger Environment ealth Cc: Bruce Chapman, Orange County Sanitation Districts Becky Brooks,Orange County Sanitation Districts COUNTY OF ORANGE JULIETTE A. POULSON,RN, MN ' HEALTH CARE AGENCY DIRECTOR y�yy, MIKE DI O DEPUTY AGENCY DIRECTOR REGULATORY HEALTH SERVICES REGULATORY HEALTH SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH STEVEN K.WONG,REHS,MPH DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LExrel%nrr NAILING ADDRESS: ffitesllly 20p8 EAST EDINGER AVENUE SANTA ANA CA 92705 720 selvrrr TELEPHONE:(714)$674000 FAX(714)9724749 E# IL: emim0iea01�NCe.W.02nge.m.uc April 5,2004 Blake Anderson, General Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 SUBJECT: Second Notice of Violation for Underground Storage Tanks Located at 10844 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley and 22212 Brookhurst Street in Huntington Beach Dear Mr.Anderson: On November 18, 2003, Orange County Environmental Health (OCEH) sent Orange County Sanitation Districts' (OCSD) Environmental Compliance and Monitoring Manager, Michael Moore, a Notice of Violation for outstanding underground storage tank (UST) violations at both your Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach sites. Please see the attached copy of the November 18"NOV. A response from Mr. Moore dated November 26, 2003, stated that all items listed in the NOV were scheduled to be completed by December 15, 2003. This date has passed and now three months later, OCSD continues with its noncompliant status with no plan for immediate correction. Several OCSD tanks have now been without a permit since July 2003. The operation of unpennitted tanks is a very serious violation of State regulations. In addition to these ongoing compliance issues, a recent inspection at the Fountain Valley site revealed new violations that will also be addressed in this NOV due to their serious nature. Below is a summary of the outstanding compliance issues at these two sites by subject area. Specific violations with corrective actions have also been provided to your staff at onsite and follow-up inspections. SECONDARY CONTAINMENT TESTING REPAIRS Power Building C: 1 - 8,000 gallon diesel tank Power Building D: I - 12,000 gallon diesel tank Emergency Power Building: 2 - 15,000 gallon tanks At the above listed Huntington Beach USTs, repairs are still ongoing in response to secondary containment testing. The secondary containment-testing deadline for all UST systems was December 31, 2002. The State Water Resources Control Board has indicated that all necessary repairs to secondary containment systems must be completed within a reasonable amount of time — 30 to 120 days. Environmental Health staff have been working with your facility representatives for several years in an effort to ensure that these repairs are made. However, Blake Anderson, General Manager Second Notice of Violation April 5, 2004 y Page 2 your facility remains out of compliance with Sections 2631 and 2636 of Title 23, which are designed to among other things,protect the water resources of the County of Orange. On 12/31/03, OCSD submitted temporary closure plans for these four tanks. A recent inspection by Jeff Nofal of my staff noted that fuel is still in the USTs, which is in violation of temporary closure requirements found in Sections 2670 and 2671 of Title 23. OCSD must meet temporary closure requirements and find alternative means of storing fuel until the repair process is complete. Conversations with your staff member Becky Brooks indicated that the repairs on these USTs will take until June to complete and you will be using these tanks throughout the repair process. The use of underground storage tanks while under temporary closure is not allowed and is a violation of State regulations. ANNUAL CERTIFICATIONS OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEMS On March 22, 2004, Karen McKabney of my staff inspected the OCSD site in Fountain Valley. She noted that the monitoring probes in the 15,000-gallon diesel UST in Building 4 and the 2000-gallon waste oil UST in the Central Generator Building were raised above the liquid level so as not to detect a release. The raising of probes is a serious violation as it demonstrates an intentional attempt to disable the monitoring system from detecting releases from these UST systems. There are other options available in order to meet UST compliance requirements and to continue the operations of the Orange County Sanitation District. These options have been discussed with your staff. Many UST facilities throughout Orange County, including government owned sites, have implemented these various options. Your continued operation of these unpermitted tanks threatens the water resources of Orange County, which your agency strives to protect; and is unfair to the many businesses and agencies that spent a great deal of funding to come into compliance by the State deadline. Operating a UST without a permit to operate is a violation of H&S Section 25284(a)(1) and is punishable by a fine of up to $5,000.00 per day, per UST. Please contact me at(714) 667-3780 to set up a meeting to discuss these issues and to develop an acceptable compliance timeline. Sincerely, Denise Fennessy, rogram Man er Environmental ealth Cc: R.P. Ghirelli, D.Env., Orange County Sanitation District Bruce Chapman, Orange County Sanitation District Becky Brooks, Orange County Sanitation District 2 9 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 27,2004 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 12, 2004 AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 23,2004 SENATE BILL No. 1272 Introduced by Senator Ortiz February 13, 2004 An act to amend Section 26909 of, and to add Chapter 7.5 (commencing with Section 60210) to Division 1 of Title 6 of, the Government Code, and to repeal oeeton 2029:Sections 20201 and 20202 of the Water Code,relating to special districts, and making an appropriation therefor. LPAISL Va COUNM'S DIGEST SB 1272, as amended, Ortiz. Special districts. (1) Existing law requires the county auditor to either make or contract for an annual audit of the accounts and records of every special purpose district within the county for which an audit is not otherwise provided. This bill would require these audits to be performed in accordance with government auditing standards for financial and compliance audits and would impose various other requirements on these audits, thus imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the Controller to review the audits under specified procedures and would make an annual appropriation to the Controller from the General Fund of up to$600,000 for that purpose. (2) Existing law provides for the establishment and operation of various special districts,the composition of their governing boards,and 96 r I a v SB 1272 —2— the payment to governing board members for attending meetings and performing other duties. This bill would require special district governing boards to conduct legal and ethics orientation sessions that governing board members would be required to attend. This bill would also establish whistle-blower protections for members or employees who make protected disclosures of improper governmental activities, as specified. This bill would define the meetings for which compensation may be paid to members of governing boards of special districts and would limit travel expenses, as specified. This bill would require that for members who first take office on or after January 1, 2005, participation in group life insurance and health and welfare benefits shall be on a self-pay basis and provide that those member:may not receive retirement benefits from the district. (3) Existing law provides that compensation of members of the governing board of any water district may not exceed$100 per day for attendance at meetings subject to a 5%annual adjustment. This bill would repeal that peevisien those provisions. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement,including the creation of a State Mandates Claims Fund to pay the costs of mandates that do not exceed$1,000,000 statewide and other procedures for claims whose statewide costs exceed $1,000,000. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates,this bill would provide that,if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state,reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Vote:2/3.Appropriation:yes.Fiscal committee: yes.State-mandated local program: yes. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. Section 26909 of the Government Code is 2 amended to read: va r I 4 ® —3— SB 1272 I 26909. (a) The county auditor shall either make or contract 2 with a certified public accountant or public accountant to make an 3 annual audit of the accounts and records of every special purpose 4 district within the county for which an audit by a certified public 5 accountant or public accountant is not otherwise provided.In each 6 case, the minimum requirements of the audit shall be prescribed 7 by the Controller and shall conform to government auditing 8 standards. 9 (b) Where an audit of a district's accounts and records is made 10 by a certified public accountant or public accountant, the 11 minimum requirements of the audit shall be prescribed by the 12 Controller and shall conform to government auditing standards, 13 and a report thereof shall be filed with the Controller and with the 14 county auditor of the county in which the district is located.The 15 report shall be filed within 12 months of the end of the fiscal year 16 or years under examination. 17 (c) Any costs incurred by the county auditor, including 18 contracts with, or employment of,certified public accountants or 19 public accountants, in making an audit of every special purpose 20 district pursuant to this section shall be borne by the district and 21 shall be a charge against any unencumbered funds of the district 22 available for the purpose. 23 (d) For joint districts lying within two or more counties, the 24 above provisions shall apply to the auditor of the county in which 25 the treasury is located. 26 (e) The county controller,or ex officio county controller,shall 27 effect this section in those counties having a county controller, or 28 ex officio county controller. 29 (f) A special district may, by unanimous request of the 30 governing board of the special district,with unanimous approval 31 of the board of supervisors,replace the annual audit with a biennial 32 audit covering a two-year period or,if the district's annual budget 33 does not exceed an amount specified by the board of supervisors, 34 an audit covering a five-year period. 35 Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section to the 36 contrary, districts shall be exempt from the requirement of an 37 annual audit if the financial statements are audited by the 38 Controller to satisfy federal audit requirements. 39 (g) A board of supervisors may substitute a financial review in 40 accordance with definitions promulgated by the United States sa r I ss 1272 -4- 1 General Accounting Office for the audit of a special district as 2 required by this section, provided that all of the following 3 conditions are met: 4 (I) The board of supervisors is the governing board of the 5 district. 6 (2) The special districts revenues and expenditures are 7 transacted through the county's financial systems. 8 (3) The special district's annual revenues do not exceed one 9 hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). 10 (h) It is the intent of the Legislature in amending this section to 11 promote accountability over public revenues by establishing a new 12 program to review and report on financial and compliance audits 13 of special districts.It is further the intent of the Legislature that the 14 Controller shall have the primary responsibility for implementing 15 and overseeing this program. 16 (1) Financial and compliance audits shall be performed in 17 accordance with government auditing standards for financial and 18 compliance audits. The audit guide prepared by the Controller 19 shall be used in the performance of these audits. The Controller 20 shall also require that special district auditors conduct testing of 21 transactions considered high risk for abuse.The additional testing 22 shall occur during each district's audit cycle's regular financial 23 statement audit or as a separate audit within that cycle. Special 24 districts shall provide funding for all costs associated with 25 conducting the audit of high-risk transactions.Every audit report 26 shall specifically and separately address each of the compliance 27 requirements included in the audit guide,stating whether or not the 28 district is in compliance with those requirements. For each 29 compliance requirement included in the audit guide, every audit 30 report shall further state that the suggested audit procedures 31 included in the audit guide for that requirement were followed in 32 the making of the audit, if that is the case, or, if not, what other 33 procedures were followed.If a special district is not in compliance, 34 the audit report shall state all instances of noncompliance. An 35 auditor shall not engage in financial or compliance audits unless, 36 within three years of commencing the first of the audits,and every 37 successive three years thereafter, the auditor completes a quality 38 control review in accordance with government auditing standards. 39 This review shall be conducted by the Controller.The time period 40 between commencement of the first audit, or completion of a � r I 7 —5— SB 1272 1 quality control review and completion of a subsequent quality 2 control review, shall be calculated from the first day of the month 3 following commencement of the audit or completion of the quality 4 control review. To determine the practicability and effectiveness 5 of the audits and audit guide, the Controller shall, on an annual 6 basis,review and monitor the audit reports. The Controller shall 7 determine whether audit reports are in conformance with repotting 8 provisions of government auditing standards and shall notify each 9 special district and the auditor regarding each determination.The 10 special district contracting for the financial and compliance audit 11 shall include a statement that provides the Controller access to 12 audit working papers. 13 (2) (A) The Controller may perform quality control reviews of 14 audit working papers to determine whether audits are performed 15 in conformity with paragraph (1). The Controller shall 16 communicate the results of his or her reviews to the auditor, and 17 the special district for which the review was performed, and shall 18 review his or her findings with the auditor. 19 (B) Prior to the performance of any quality control reviews,the 20 Controller shall develop and publish guidelines and standards for 21 those reviews. Pursuant to the development of those guidelines 22 and standards,the Controller shall provide opportunity for public 23 comment 24 (C) (i) Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, the 25 Controller shall conduct a quality control review of the audit 26 working papers of the auditor who performed the audits for a 27 special district if either of the following applies: 28 (1) The Controller has reason to believe that public revenues 29 were not appropriately utilized. 30 (11) There is reason to believe that a special district report is 31 false, incomplete,or incorrect. 32 (ii) If the quality control review of the Controller indicates that 33 the audit was conducted in a manner that may constitute 34 unprofessional conduct as defined pursuant to Section 5100 of the 35 Business and Professions Code,including,but not limited to,gross 36 negligence resulting in a material misstatement in the audit, the 37 Controller shall refer the case to the California Board of 38 Accountancy. If the California Board of Accountancy finds that 39 the auditor conducted an audit in an unprofessional manner, the 40 auditor is prohibited from performing any audit of a spatial district SB 1272 —6— I for a period of three years, in addition to any other penalties that 2 the California Board of Accountancy may impose. 3 (D) In any matter that is referred to the California Board of 4 Accountancy under clause (ii), the Controller may suspend the 5 auditor from performing any special district audits pending final 6 disposition of the matter by the California Board of Accountancy 7 if the Controller gives the auditor notice and an opportunity to 8 respond to that suspension. The auditor shall be given credit for 9 any period of suspension if the California Board of Accountancy 10 prohibits the auditor from performing audits of the special district 11 under clause (ii). In no event may the Controller suspend an 12 auditor under this subdivision for a period of longer than three 13 years. 14 (E) The legislative body of a special district may refer an 15 auditor of a special district to the California Board of Accountancy 16 for action pursuant to subparagraph (C) if an audit of a special 17 district was conducted in a manner that may constitute 18 unprofessional conduct as defined by Section 5100 of the Business 19 and Professions Code, including, but not limited to, gross 20 negligence resulting in a material misstatement in the audit. 21 (3) The Controller shall conduct any additional audits that are 22 necessary to carry out any of his or her statutory duties and 23 responsibilities. Nothing in this section shall be construed to 24 authorize any special district,or any subcontractor or subrecipient, 25 to constrain,in any manner,the Controller from carrying out any 26 additional audits.However,to the extent that the required financial 27 and compliance audits do not provide the Controller with the 28 information necessary to carry out his or her responsibilities, the 29 Controller shall plan additional audits as appropriate to avoid any 30 unnecessary duplication of audit efforts. In performing these 31 additional audits, the Controller shall, to the extent deemed 32 appropriate under the circumstances, build upon the work 33 performed during the required financial and compliance audit The 34 Controller shall receive reimbursement from the special districts 35 for the costs of these additional audits. 36 (i) The sum of up to sirs hundred thousand dollars($600,000) 37 is hereby appropriated annually from the General Fund to the 38 Controller as necessary to provide sufficient funding for one audit 39 manager,four audit specialists,and other expenses to implement 40 and operate the special district oversight program. � r I -7— SB 1272 1 SEC. 2. Chapter 7.5 (commencing with Section 60210) is 2 added to Division I of Title 6 of the Government Code, to read: 3 4 CHAPrER 7.5. SPECIAL DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARDS 5 6 Article 1. General Provisions 7 8 60210. (a) "Member" as used in this chapter, means a 9 member of the governing board of a special district. 10 (b) "Special district," as used in this chapter,means an agency 11 of the state that is formed pursuant to a general or special act for 12 the local performance of governmental or proprietary functions 13 within limited boundaries and' 14 that has a governing 15 board all of whose members are elected by registered voters or 16 landowners within the special district or whose members are 17 appointed to feed terms. "Special district'excludes any special 18 district having a governing board consisting, in whole or pan, of 19 ex QQicio members who are officers of a county, city, or another 20 special district. Special district also excludes any special district 21 whose members are appointees of those officers, other than those 22 who are appointed to serve for fixed terms. "Special district" 23 excludes the state, a county,a city,a school district,a community 24 facilities district, an air quality district or other regulatory district 25 having responsibilities related to the protection of public health; 26 eP health. "Special district"also excludes a joint powers authority 27 consisting solely of cities,counties,or one or more city and one or 28 more county. 29 60211. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 30 governing board of every special district shall comply with the 31 requirements of this chapter. 32 33 Article 2. Ethics 34 35 36 37 ability and FesetiFees to fteess at least annually an efientatien 38 39 eanduet and the relevant ethiesl issues and laws re4ating to 40 96 r I SB 1272 —8— 1 2 3 videotaped training, or attendietee at fegienal or statewide 4 5 7 . 8 9 10 60215. (a) Each member of a governing board of a special 11 district, except a member who term of once ends before January 12 1, 2006, and each executive officer of a special district serving on 13 January 1, 2005, shall receive training in ethical standards of 14 conduct before January 1, 2006. 15 (b) Each member of a governing boar( and each executive 16 officer who commences serving a special district on or gfter 17 January 1, 2005, shall receive training in ethical standards of 18 conduct no later than one year from the first day of service to the 19 special district. Theregfter, members of governing boards and 20 executive officers shall receive training in ethical standards of 21 conduct at least once every two years. 22 (c) The governing board of a special district shall designate the 23 employees who qualify as executive officers for the purposes of this 24 section. 25 60216. (a) A special district, at least once annually, shall 26 offer to the members of its governing board and its executive 27 officers training in ethical standards of conduct.A special district 28 may identify conferences, seminars, or other courses that meet the 29 requirements of this section. 30 (b) A special district shall consult with the Fair Political 31 Practices Commission and the Attorney General to determine the 32 appropriate content for the training in ethical standards of 33 conduct. 34 (c) The requirements of this article shall be met by training in 35 ethical standards of conduct and shall include information 36 regarding potential ethical abuses relating to, but not limited to, 37 all of the following matters: 38 (1) The direct and indirect business relationships among 39 members of governing boards, contractors, and vendors, and 96 9 —9— SB 1272 1 between members of governing boards and officers and employees 2 of other public agencies. 3 (2) The solicitation of campaign contributions by members of 4 governing boards, officers, or employees, and the receipt of 5 contributimufrom bidders, contractors, or subcontractors. 6 (3) The use of special district funds for personal expenses. 7 60217. Notwithstanding Section 60215, a member of a 8 governing board or an executive gfficer who serves more than one 9 special district shall only be required to meet the requirements of 10 this section once every two years without regard to the number of I I special districts with which he or she is affiliated.A member of a 12 governing board or an executive officer who meets the 13 requirements of Section 60215 for one special district shall not be 14 required by another special district with which he or she is 15 affiliated to receive additional training in ethical standards of 16 conduct. 17 60218. A special district shall maintain records indicating the 18 dares that the members of its governing board and its executive 19 officers received training in ethical standards of conduct, and the 20 agency or entity that conducted the training.Notwithstanding any 21 other provision of law, a special district shall maintain these 22 records for at least five years after the members and executive 23 officers receive the training. A special district shall make these 24 records available to the public for inspection and copying. 25 26 Article 2.5. Improper Governmental Activity 27 28 60221. For the purposes of this article: 29 (a) "Employee" means any individual who is a member of the 30 governing board of a special district or employed by a special 31 district. 32 (b) "Improper governmental activity" means any activity by 33 a special district or by an employee that is undertaken in the 34 performance of the employee's official duties,whether or not that 35 action is within the scope of his or her employment, and that(1) 36 is in violation of any state or federal law or regulation,including, 37 but not limited to, corruption, malfeasance, bribery, theft of 38 government property, fraudulent claims, fraud, coercion, 39 conversion, malicious prosecution, misuse of government 96 r I SB 1272 —10— 1 property,or willful omission to perform duty,or(2)involves gross 2 misconduct or gross negligence. 3 (c) "Person" means any individual, corporation, trust, 4 association, any state or local government, or any agency or 5 instrumentality of any of the foregoing. 6 (d) "Protected disclosure" means any good faith 7 communication that discloses or demonstrates an intention to 8 disclose information that may evidence (1) an improper 9 governmental activity or(2)any condition that may significantly 10 threaten the health or safety of employees or the public if the I I disclosure or intention to disclose was made for the purpose of 12 remedying that condition. 13 (e) "Illegal order" means any directive to violate or assist in 14 violating a federal, state, or local law, rule, or regulation or any 15 order to work or cause others to work in conditions outside of their 16 line of duty that would unreasonably threaten the health or safety 17 of employees or the public. 18 (D "Chief administrative officer"means the person employed 19 by a special district, whether directly or by contract, who has 20 primary responsibility for the special districts administration. The 21 title of the chief administrative officer may include, but is not 22 limited to, general manager, district manager, district 23 administrator, or executive officer. 24 60221.5. (a) An employee may not directly or indirectly use 25 or attempt to use the official authority or influence of the employee 26 for the purpose of intimidating, threatening, coercing, 27 commanding, or attempting to intimidate, threaten, coerce, or 28 command any person for the purpose of interfering with the rights 29 conferred pursuant to this article. 30 (b) For the purpose of subdivision(a), "use of official authority 31 or influence" includes promising to confer, or conferring, any 32 benefit;effecting, or threatening to effect, any reprisal; or taking, 33 or directing others to take, or recommending, processing, or 34 approving, any personnel action, including, but not limited to, 35 appointment, promotion, transfer, assignment, performance 36 evaluation, suspension, or other disciplinary action. 37 (c) Any employee who violates subdivision (a)may be liable 38 in an action for civil damages brought against the employee by the 39 offended party. sB 1272 1 (d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize an 2 individual to disclose information otherwise prohibited by or 3 under law. 4 60222. The county auditor of the county in which the special 5 district is located, or has its primary office, shall administer the 6 provisions of this article and shall investigate and report on 7 improper governmental activities. If, after investigating, the 8 county auditor finds that an employee may have engaged or 9 participated in improper governmental activities, the county 10 auditor shall send a copy of the investigative report to the 11 employee's appointing power. Within 69 30 days after receiving 12 a copy of the county auditor's investigative report,the eppeinting 13 pewee chief administrative officer shall either serve a notice of 14 adverse action upon the employee who is the subject of the 15 investigative report or set forth in writing its reasons for not taking 16 adverse action. 17 60222.5. Upon receiving specific information that any 18 employee or special district has engaged in an improper 19 governmental activity, the county auditor may conduct an 20 investigative audit of the matter. The identity of the person 21 providing the information that initiated the investigative audit 22 shall not be disclosed without the written permission of the person 23 providing the information unless the disclosure is to a law 24 enforcement agency that is conducting a criminal investigation. 25 60223. (a) If the county auditor determines that there is 26 reasonable cause to believe that an employee or special district has 27 engaged in any improper governmental activity, he or she shall 28 report the nature and details of the activity to the Head-ef-the 29 chief 30 administrative officer, or if the county auditor has reason to 31 conclude that the activity may involve a violation of criminal law, 32 to the district attorney or county council, as the case may be. 33 (b) In any case in which the county auditor submits a report of 34 alleged improper activity to the 35 appropriate appaiming ftilterity chief administrative officer, that 36 individual shall report to the county auditor with respect to any 37 action taken by the individual regarding the activity,the first report 38 being transmitted no later than 30 days after the date of the county 39 auditor's report and monthly thereafter until final action has been 40 taken. 9 r I SB 1272 —12— e 1 (c) Every investigative audit shall be kept confidential,except 2 that the county auditor may issue any report of an investigation that 3 has been substantiated, keeping confidential the identity of the 4 individual or individuals involved, or release any findings 5 resulting from an investigation conducted pursuant to this article 6 that is deemed necessary to serve the interests of the public. 7 (d) This section shall not limit any authority conferred upon the 8 Attorney General or any other department or agency of 9 government to investigate any matter. 10 60223.5. (a) An employee or applicant fro employment with 11 a special district who files a written complaint with his or her 12 supervisor,manager,or the appeiuting-pewer chief administrative 13 officer alleging actual or attempted acts of reprisal, retaliation, 14 threats,coercion, or similar improper acts prohibited by Section 15 60221.5, may also file a copy of the written complaint with the 16 personnel departmette chief administrative officer of the special 17 district, together with a swom statement that the contents of the IS written complaint are true,or are believed by the affiant to be true, 19 under penalty of perjury.The complaint filed with the depemnent 20 chief administrative officer shall be filed within 12 months of the 21 most recent act of reprisal complained about. 22 (b) Any person who intentionally engages in acts of reprisal, 23 retaliation, threats,coercion,or similar acts against an employee 24 or applicant for employment for having made a protected 25 disclosure,is subject to a fine not to exceed ten thousand dollars 26 ($10,000)and imprisonment in the county jail for a period not to 27 exceed one year. 28 (c) In addition to all other penalties provided by law,any person 29 who intentionally engages in acts of reprisal,retaliation, threats, 30 coercion, or similar acts against an employee or applicant for 31 employment for having made a protected disclosure shall be liable 32 in an action for damages brought against him or her by the injured 33 party. Punitive damages may be awarded by the court where the 34 acts of the offending party are proven to be malicious. Where 35 liability has been established, the injured party shall also be 36 entitled to reasonable attorney's fees as provided by law.However, 37 any action for damages shall not be available to the injured party 38 unless the injured parry has first filed a complaint with the 39 chief administrative 96 r I 9 —13— SB 1272 I officer pursuant to subdivision(a),and the department has issued, 2 or`.m;Rto issue,failed to issue findings. 3 (d) This section is not intended to prevent an appaiating power 4 the chief administrative officer, a manager, or supervisor from 5 taking, directing others to take,recommending,or approving any 6 personnel action or from taking or failing to take a personnel action 7 with respect to any employee or applicant for employment if the 8 appointing power chief administrative officer, manager, or 9 supervisor reasonably believes any action or inaction is justified 10 on the basis of evidence separate and apart from the fact that the 11 person has made a protected disclosure as defined in subdivision 12 (b)of Section 60221. 13 (e) In any civil action or administrative proceeding,once it has 14 been demonstrated by a preponderance of evidence that an activity 15 protected by this article was a contributing factor in the alleged 16 retaliation against a former, current,or prospective employee,the 17 burden of proof shall be on the supervisor,manager,orappein9ng 18 pewee the chief administrative officer to demonstrate by clear and 19 convincing evidence that the alleged action would have occurred 20 for legitimate, independent reasons even if the employee had not 21 engaged in protected disclosures or refused an illegal order.If the 22 supervisor,manager,or appointing-pewee the chief administrative 23 officer fails to meet this burden of proof in an adverse action 24 against the employee in any administrative review,challenge, or 25 adjudication in which retaliation has been demonstrated to be a 26 contributing factor, the employee shall have a complete 27 affirmative defense in the adverse action. 28 (f) Nothing in this article shall be deemed to diminish the 29 rights, privileges, or remedies of any employee under any other 30 federal or state law or under any employment contract or collective 31 bargaining agreement. 32 60224. If the speeial disoiet persennel deparenen chief 33 administrative officer determines that there is a reasonable basis 34 for an alleged violation or finds an actual violation of Section 35 60221.5,it shall transmit a copy of the investigative report to the 36 county auditor.All working papers pertaining to the investigative 37 report shall be made available under subpoena in a civil action. 38 96 SB 1272 — 14— 1 Article 3. Compensation and Benefits 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 atteadenee at board meetings, as defined in Seetion 9 10 11 emeeed six days per mentk- 12 13 14 1 �5 . 16 17 18 fef the eetuall amount of die expenses. 19 60225. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 20 governing board of a special district may adopt an ordinance that 21 provides compensation to the members of that governing board, 22 pursuant to this section. 23 (b) The ordinance may provide for an amount of compensation 24 that shall not exceed one hundred dollars($100)for each day of 25 service, not to exceed six days a month. 26 (c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), the ordinance may 27 provide for an amount of compensation that shall not exceed one 28 hundred dollars($100)for each day of service, not to exceed 10 29 days a month if the special district's population is greater than two 30 million persons or if the special district's annual total expenditures 31 for general purpose transactions is greater than one hundred 32 million dollars ($100,000,000), as shown in the most recent 33 edition of the Special Districts Annual Report published by the 34 Controller. 35 (d) Notwithstanding subdivision(b)or(c), where the principal 36 act of the special district authorizes a maximum amount of 37 compensation that is less than one hundred dollars($100)for each 38 day of service, that lesser amount shall prevail. 39 (e) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a 40 special district may provide monthly salaries to the members of its 96 r I SB 1272 1 governing board if those monthly salaries are authorized in the 2 special districts principal act and the amount of the monthly 3 salary does not exceed the mazimmn monthly amounts allowed 4 pursuant to subdivision(b)or(c). 5 (t) As used in this section, "day of service"means- 6 (I) Attendance at a meeting of that special district that is 7 conducted pursuant to the Ralph M. Brown Act (Chapter 9 8 (commencing with Section 54950)of Division 2 of ule 5). 9 (2) Representation of that special district at a public event, 10 provided that the board of directors has previously approved the 11 number's representation at a board meeting and that the member 12 delivers a written report to the governing board regarding the 13 member'r representation at the new board meeting following the 14 public event. 15 (3) Representation of that special district at a public meeting 16 or a public hearing conducted by another public agency, 17 including, but not limited to, a ch% county, special district, school 18 district, community redevelopment agency,joint powers agency,a 19 regional agency, board, or commission,a state agency, board, or 20 commission, the Legislature, or the Congress,provided that the 21 board of directors has previously approved the member's 22 representation at a board meeting and that the member delivers a 23 written report to the governing board regarding the member's 24 represemation at the next board meeting following the public 25 meeting or public hearing. 26 (4) participation in a training program on a topic that is 27 directly related to the special district, including, but not limited to, 28 training in ethical standards of conduct pursuant to Article 2 29 (commencing with Section 602I5). provided that the board of 30 directors has previously approved the member' participation at a 31 board meeting and that the member delivers a writer report to the 32 governing board regarding the number's participation at the next 33 board meeting following the training program. 34 60225.5. (a) If the principal act of a special district 35 authorizes a special district to reimburse the expenses of its 36 governing board members or employees, the special district shall 37 follow the Internal Revenue Service's accountable plan guidelines. 38 However, the amount of reimbursement may not exceed the 39 amounts permitted for state employees pursuant to Sections I i SB 1272 —16— s 1 599.615 to 599.638.1. inclusive, ofTItk 2 of the California Code 2 of Regulations. 3 (b) Any reconciliation of advance payments for expenses and 4 any reimbursement for expenses paid to a special districts 5 governing board members or employees shall be supported by 6 receipts. 7 60226. (a) Notwithstanding Article 1 (commencing with 8 Section 53200)of Chapter 2 of Part 1 of Division 2,or any other 9 provision of law,the governing board of a special district by itself, 10 or as a party to a joint exercise of powers agreement, may not 11 provide group life insurance or health and welfare benefits, as 12 those terms are defined in Section 53200 to any person first 13 appointed to an appointment or first elected to a term of office that 14 begins on or after January 1,2005,unless the person participates 15 on a self-pay basis. 16 (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law,the governing 17 board of a special district may not provide retirement benefits to 18 any member first appointed or fast elected to a term of office that 19 begins on or after January 1,2005. 20 21 Article 4. Audits 22 23 60230. (a) Special districts shall cause audits to be performed 24 in compliance with Section 26909. 25 (b) In addition to the requirements of Section 26909, the 26 governing board of a special district shall do all of the following: 27 (1) Require the auditor to meet directly with the governing 28 board in an open session with the opportunity for public discussion 29 of the auditor's findings consistent with the requirements of the 30 Ralph hC Brown Act (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 31 54950)of Division 2 of Title 5). 32 (2) Prohibit a public accounting firm from providing audit 33 services to a special district if the lead audit partner, or 34 coordinating audit partner, having primary responsibility for the 35 audit,or the audit partner responsible for reviewing the audit,has 36 performed audit services for that special districNneeeh-dfor more 37 than the six previous fiscal years, before the ftscal year being 38 audited. If the auditor-controller is perfomring these audits rather 39 than a public accounting firm,then the lead auditor or coordinating 40 principals performing the audit within the auditor-controller's 9 r I -17- SB 1272 1 office shall also comply with these requirements.The Controller 2 may waive this requirement if he or she finds no otherwise eligible 3 auditor is available at a reasonable cost to perform the audit The 4 2005 calendar year is the base year for determining whether a 5 rotation shall be implemented. 6 (3) Revoke the authority of auditors or accountants to conduct 7 audits of the special district for three years when an independent 8 audit finds that the auditors or accountants failed to conduct a 9 thorough and complete audit. 10 (c) The auditor or accountant shall promptly notify the 11 Controller of any compliance violations. 12 (d) The Controller may audit any special district that is not in 13 compliance with the prescribed standards at the expense of the 14 special district. for more than 15 SEC. 3. Section 20201 of the Water Code is repealed. 16 SEC.4. Section 20202 of the Hater Code is repealed. 17 2QM. In my efelinmee adapted pursuant!a this ehapteF ie 18 ' 19 20 21 22 following the opefetive date of the last adjustment; ef the 23 24 25 26 Mouth. 27 SEC.5. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to 28 Section 6 of Article XM B of the California Constitution for 29 certain costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school 30 district because in that regard this act creates a new crime or 31 infraction,eliminates a crime or infraction,or changes the penalty 32 for a crime or infraction,within the meaning of Section 17556 of 33 the Government Code,or changes the definition of a crime within 34 the meaning of Section 6 of Article XM B of the California 35 Constitution. 36 However, notwithstanding Section 17610 of the Government 37 Code, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that this 38 act contains other costs mandated by the state,reimbursement to 39 local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made 40 pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500)of Division � r I SB 1272 —Is- 1 4 of 1"ide 2 of the Government Code. If the statewide cost of the 2 claim for reimbursement does not exceed one million dollars 3 ($1,000,000), reimbursement shall be made from the State 4 Mandates Claims Fund. O DRAFT DATE The Honorable U.S.House of Representatives 2338 Rayburn House Office Building Washington,DC 20515 Dear Representative: On behalf of the [ORGANIZATION NAME],I write in support of the Orange County Sanitation District's(District),ongoing effort to upgrade its treatment works to comply with the Clean Water Act's secondary treatment standard mandate. We are especially grateful for the leadership role you have assumed on this matter over the past year. Because of your support and active involvement, our community is enjoying a meaningful federal partnership to ensure compliance with this water quality mandate. In our discussions with the District,we understand that a request of$10,000,000 is being sought as part of the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency's fiscal year 2005 budget. We understand that this may be an austere budget year and are therefore hopeful that you will be able to secure assistance that at a minimum maintains the established federal partnership that began in earnest last year. Our organization represents [add description and how the funding will support groups' priorities etc.] We understand that in prior years the federal government has dedicated substantial resources to other coastal communities to support their efforts to meet secondary treatment mandates. Thus the support you are providing means that Orange County ratepayers will only shoulder their proportional share of compliance costs as other communities. Today's priority by the District to meet this mandate is vital to the District's capability to provide improved water quality of our coastal waters as well as to position the District with the ability to meet other pressing water quality needs. This includes the ability to work with our local communities to address such matters as stormwater controls and enhanced biosolids management. OCSD provides sewage collection,treatment and disposal services for more than two million Orange County residents. It is a public agency responsible for safely collecting, treating,disposing of sewage and industrial waste. In addition, OCSD is working jointly with the Orange County Water District to design and construct a state-of the art ground water replenishment system to help meet the water supply needs of the region.Through the reclaiming of 70 million gallons per day of highly treated effluent from OCSD,this is the largest reclamation project in the country. The support of our effort to meet secondary treatment levels fully will enable OCSD to provide an increase of over 50 million gallons per day of highly treated effluent to this project thereby enhancing the County water supply reliability. C:\Documents and Settings\wassgren\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKCB\fy05support.doc DRAFT Again, we greatly appreciate your past support of th(, ...... .......__.... ... ....r - community. We look forward to learning of a successful outcome on this request. In the interim, if we can provide any other information on this important project. please let me know. Sincerely yours, C:\I)ocuments and Settings\wassgren\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKCB\fyO5support.doc ROLL CALL BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MEETING DATE: 4/28/04 TIME: 7:00 p.m. (SIMONIAN) .................... ANDERSON...................� (WILSON) ........................ BANKHEAD...................� L (VACANT)......................... BORTLE ................. ..... g i (SWAN) ............................ BRADY .........................�� �L (YOST) ............................ CAMPBELL ...................� i (AMBRIZ).......................... CAVECCHE................... (GARCIA) ......................... CHRISTY..................... ..... / A/ (CRANDALL).................... COLLINS ......................�G ✓ (COERPER) .................... GREEN....................... (BROADWATER) ............. DALTON....................... �G �/_ — Al (SHAWVER) .................... DONAHUE.....................g g It, (WILSON)......................... DUVALL...................... ✓ g Y (DICKINSON)...................z9GKEM4ENM.................� �� (SCHAFER).....................:.FERRYMAW ................�� �� (POE)................................ JEMPSA...................... a, g (DAVERT)......................... KAWASHIMA............... ✓ / (SHEA) ............................. KROM........................ (DOW).............................. MARSHALL.................. / ✓ (HERNANDEZ)................. MC CRACKEN...............�L (BEAUMAN) ..................... MOORE........................ (EPPERSON)................... NEUGEBAUER.............. ✓ �� (KEENAN) ........................ PIERCY........................ ✓ _G — (WEBB) ............................ RIDGEWAY................... i (SMITH, CHUCK)............. SILVA........................... (HERMAN)........................ WALKER....................... w g a STAFF: Anderson ✓ �tp� , Beekman eei Ghirelli ✓ Kyle Ludwin Miles Ooten Tomko Streed OTHERS: Woodruff Nixon 4/27/04 W pAtaladMnXBSOIRECTOROmebn Roll CaII m SIGN-IN SHEET ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT oy BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM leaseprint) leaseprint) 1� 1.i Ur b 0 c4✓a G/ c9Gcv17 tJo tw oM AfG� ND-A 1 7&fAC / t l551QW.TAl XS rrU S`(N 2v .zo 0650 cw fj /rli2� �s o ocw> a H 0P.DTAWDMIMBSIFORMSISIGN-IN FORM.DOC REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: LI,' C% 6 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) 7"Oyv{ gfi6LAN.P HOME ADDRESS: 97 /) S'WA LLa /-AN E (number/street) G G. 42 (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: Oh S3 9 3 2( 9 REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair,speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: nj�azb q'�t- AGENDA ITEM NO. lS . . . . . . . . . 0. .1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAME: (please print) '%>Oyl 2 HOME ADDRESS: M,�"v, (number/street) 1as 2a (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: (9z) �{3U11-2'2fo0 REPRESENTING: SUC4C-�+er V-6t,IA,-6 7.OA (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. AS determined by the Chair,speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: o2lY AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: �J/I✓ ,V (number/s set) (((city/zip code TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair,speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for rr distribution. DATE: AGENDA ITEM /NO.(�"�C 4 4q( NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (numb//e//r/�� real WFt➢'�(K� (city/zip code) ` Q TELEPHONE: (7/�l /U��/2��� n✓ ��� REPRESENTING: (self/name of organization) REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should complete and submit this form to the Board Secretary prior to commencement of the Board meeting. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion. Remarks may be limited to three minutes or less. Any handouts (35 COPIES REQUIRED) must be given to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting for distribution. DATE: -/-�� AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (please print) HOME ADDRESS: (number/street) (city/zip code) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: '] (self name of organization) LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: April21, 2004 RE: Senate Bill 1272 (Ortiz)—Special Districts Governance, Including Compensation and Expense Reimbursement You have previously been briefed on the above-referenced measure, which was introduced in the Senate on February 13, 2004, and has subsequently been amended twice, most recently on April 12, 20D4, and is presently set for hearing on April 21, 2004. In the event that hearing proceeds as scheduled, I will provide to you an update at the time of your Board Meeting. The measure was introduced by Senator Ortiz, in large part responding to two (2) matters receiving widespread media publicity involving Special Districts and abuses of the permitted compensation and expense allowances under existing state law. One incident was relating to two (2) water agencies in the Sacramento Valley, and the other was water agencies in the San Gabriel Valley here in Southern California. The Bill has received widespread attention and almost universal opposition from all Special Districts, and the associations representing them, including CASA and ACWA. I am attaching, herewith, a copy of the Senate Local Government Committee Consultant's Report of Mr. Peter Detwiler, which I highly commend for your reading. It not only provides you the analysis of this pending Legislative Bill, but is an exceptional writing in terms of historical actions by the State Legislators going back over the past sixty (60) years, and an infusion of the reasonings underlying many of the historical changes that have occurred during that period. Frankly, most of the provisions of the Bill, either have no application to the District, or are no different than the practice presently in effect. Particularly, if your Board adopts the new ordinance and resolution establishing a revised policy for compensation and business expense reimbursement, as recommended by the sub-committee of Directors McCracken and S. Anderson. Perhaps the most noteworthy provision, that has been found objectionable, is Senator Ortiz calling for a roll back of the per meeting/day of service stipend from whatever the present limits are (for OCSO $170 each) to a maximum of $100. 1 would be truly shocked if such a proposal were, in fact, passed and approved by either, much less both bodies of the Legislature. Peter Detwilers report is very candid, and he has an excellent understanding of local government law, having served in his capacity for many years. He notes the serious drawbacks of Senator Ortiz's proposal. nVWIemLocal r April21, 2004 Page 2 An additional requirement of the Bill calls for the governing Board to receive mandatory ethics training on an annual or bi-annual basis. Coincidentally, your General Manager, Blake Anderson, is making a recommendation of that at the forthcoming Steering Committee meeting to be comprised of a presentation, by my office, on an overview of the Political Reform Act, prohibition of interest in contracts law, general conflicts of interest and key provisions of the District's purchasing resolution, and the Rules of Procedure. Lastly, while the Bill, as written, applies only to those Special Districts "governed by an elected governing Board", and therefore, would not be applicable to OCSD, the Consultant has noted that, and if the Bill proceeds forward, that limitation would most certainly be amended so as to encompass all Independent Special Districts, whether elected or appointed Boards. THOMAS L.WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:jlo Enclosure Addendum: April 21, 2004—3:30 p.m. We have just been notified that the Committee did hear the Bill this morning, and with Senator Ortiz offering several amendments, it was passed and sent to the Senate Appropriations Committee. The key changes are: 1. Large Districts ($2 million population or budget> $100 million)would be authorized ten (10) meetings a month, but still at a maximum of$100 per meeting, with no escalation, as at present. 2. Meetings for compensation would only be publicly noticed Board and Committee meetings, unless attendance was approved in advance at a publicly noticed Board meeting. Hopefully, we will see the printed version of the amendments (which is the only thing you can rely on!) by the time of your Board meeting. osW LLawl SB 1272 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis Page 1 of 13 V SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE Senator Tom Torlakson, Chair BILL NO: SB 1272 REARING: 4/21/04 AUTHOR: Ortiz FISCAL: Yea VERSION: 4/12/04 CONSULTANT: Detwiler SPECIAL DISTRICTS' GOVERNANCE Background Reacting to a series of editorials and news articles in the Sacramento Bee, legislators began looking into the governance of California's 3,300 special districts. In November 2003, at the request of Senator Ortiz, the Senate Local Government Committee held an interim hearing called, "Integrity and Accountability: Exploring Special Districts' Governance." There was general, although not universal, support among the four legislators and the speakers for statutory reforms. Proposed Law I. Audits Since the mid-1950s, state law has required county auditors to annually audit special districts' books. A county auditor must either audit a special district or contract with a certified public accountant to perform the work. The audit must follow the State Controller's requirements and conform to generally accepted auditing standards. The district pays for the audit. A district can shift from an annual audit to biennial audits with the unanimous approval of the district's governing board. A district can also shift to an audit once every five years if the size of the district's budget is below a threshold set by the county board of supervisors. Senate Bill 1272 requires special districts' audits to comply with governing auditing standards for financial and compliance audits. Auditors moat test transactions with a high risk for abuse. Audit reports meet state whether or not the district complies with the compliance requirements in the State Controller's audit guide. To be eligible to conduct financial or compliance audits, an auditor moat complete regular quality control reviews conducted by the State Controller. SB 1272 -- 4/12/04 -- Page 2 The State Controller must annually review and monitor file://C:\Documents%20and%2OSettingsUryle\Local%2OSettings\Temporor/o2Olntemets/o2OFiles... 4/222004 SB 1272 Senate Bill-Bill Analysis Page 2 of 13 special districts' audit reports to determine if they conform to the reporting requirements. The State Controller moat notify each district and its auditor of -� these determinations. SB 1272 allows the State Controller to perform quality control reviews of a districts audit working papers, based on published guidelines and standards. The bill requires the State Controller to conduct a quality control review of a district-a auditor if the Controller believes that "revenues were not appropriately utilized- or if the Controller believes that the report is false, incomplete, or incorrect. If the State Controllers review determines that the audit could be the result of unprofessional conduct, the bill requires the Controller to refer the case to the California Board of Accountancy. The State Controller may suspend the auditor from performing districts- audits while the Board investigates. If the Board finds that an auditor conducted an audit in an unprofessional manner, the bill prohibits that auditor from performing special districts$ audits for three years. A districts legislative body may similarly refer an auditor to the California Board of Accountancy. The bill allows the State Controller to conduct additional audits, building on the work of the districts, regular auditors. SB 1272 appropriates $600,000 a year from the State General Fund to the State Controller to pay for the bills special district oversight program. The State Controller may audit a special district that does not comply with the statutory audit standards at that district's expense. SB 1272 requires special districts, governing boards to require their auditors to meet with them in an open session to discuss their findings. Starting in the 200S calendar year, the bill prohibits a public accounting firm from auditing a special district if the lead audit partner, or the primary coordinating audit partner, or the responsible reviewing audit partner has audited that district for six previous fiscal years. When SB 1272 -- 4/12/04 -- Page 3 a county auditor-controller audits a special district, the lead auditor or coordinating principals moat comply with this requirement. SB 1272 allows the State Controller to waive this requirement if "no otherwise eligible auditor is available.- II. Ethics- State law prohibits unethical conduct by public officials, including special districts, officers and employees : Public officials cannot have financial interests in contracts made in their official capacities. Those file://C.\Documents%2Oand%2OSettings\kyle\Local%2OSettings\Temporarya/o2Olntemd%2OFilm... 4/22/2004 t SB 1272 Senate Bill-Bill Analysis Page 3 of 13 contracts are void. Violations are crimes and can result in permanent disqualification from public office. Those prohibitions don't apply to public officials who have only specified "remote interests- in contracts. Local officials cannot engage in paid activities that conflict with their public duties. Local agencies can adopt their own rules and disciplinary procedures. Local officials cannot solicit political contributions from other officials or their employees. Public officials with prohibited financial interests must disclose the conflict, recuse themselves, and leave the discussion until matters conclude. The Political Reform Act of 1974 also governs local officials' behavior, including disclosure of their economic interests and campaign regulations. Senate Bill 1272 requires special districts' governing boards to provide their members and senior management staff with annual opportunities to participate in orientation courses regarding official conduct and relevant ethical issues and laws relating to lobbying. The courses must be conducted in consultation with or pursuant to standards set by the Pair Political Practices Commission. The orientation course must cover the Political Reform Act of 1974, plus five other specified statutes. The bill requires special districts' board members to attend one of these courses at least once every two years. They can comply by participating in online training BE 1272 -- 4/12/04 -- Page 4 courses, videotaped training, or by attending regional or statewide training. III. Whistleblowere Although state law protects state employees from retaliation when they report problems, there are no similar laws for special districts- employees. Senate Bill 1272 prohibits special districts' employees (both members of their governing boards and those employed by districts) from using their official authority or influence to intimidate, threaten, coerce, command any person with the purpose of interfering with their rights disclose information about improper governmental activities. Improper governmental activities include violations of state or federal laws, or gross misconduct or gross negligence. Violations of this prohibition can result in civil damages. BB 1272 requires the county auditor of the county in which a special district is located (or where the district's file://C,\Documentsm/m20andm/QOSetdngsUtyle\Localm/m2OSettings\Temporary'/.201ntemetm/o2OFiles... 4/22/2004 SB 1272 Senate Bill-Bill Analysis Page 4 o{13 primary office is located) to administer the bill's provisions for investigating and reporting on improper governmental activities. If the county auditor finds that Q a district employee may have engaged in improper governmental activities, the auditor must send the investigative report to the employee's appointing power. The appointing power has 60 days to serve notice of adverse action against the employee or explain in writing the reasons for not acting. The bill also requires the county auditor to report the improper activity to the head of the employing agency, or the appointing authority. That person must tell the county auditor about any action taken. That person must report to the county auditor within 30 days and then every month until final action has been taken. If the county auditor concludes that the activity may involve a criminal violation, the county auditor must report the activity to the district attorney or "county council." SB 1272 allows special district employees and job applicants who file written complaints with their supervisors, managers, or appointing powers alleging acts of reprisal, retribution, threats, coercion, or improper acts to also file their complaints with the district's SR 1272 -- 4/12/04 -- Page 5 personnel department within 12 months of the incident. The personnel department moat send a copy of its investigative report to the county auditor. Intentional acts of reprisal, retaliation, threats, coercion, or similar acts against special districts' employees or job applicants for making protected disclosures can result in a fine of up to $10,000 and a jail term of up to a year. Civil damages, including punitive damages, plus attorney s fees are also available if the injured party filed a complaint with a district's personnel department and the department issued or failed to issue findings. If there is a preponderance of evidence that a protected activity contributed to the retaliation, then the burden of proof is on the supervisor, manager, or appointing power to show that the action occurred for legitimate, independent reasons. IV. Stipends The most common way for special districts to compensate their board members is by paying stipends. Many districts pay stipends to their board members for attending a meeting or performing a day's work, following statutory schedules. Recreation and park districts, for example, may pay stipends of up to $100 a day for attending board meetings, but directors can't receive more than $500 a month. There has not been a comprehensive review since the Senate Local Government Committee's 1987 interim file://C:\Documents%20and%20SettingsVryle\Local%20Settings\Temporary%20Intemet%20Files... 4/22/2004 SB 1272 Senate Bill-Bill Analysis Page 5 of 13 hearing on -Deregulating Local Officials' Compensation.- Until 1984, districts sponsored bills seeking legislative approval to boost the amounts of their directors' stipends. Tired of acting on repeated requests for what they perceived as a local matter, legislators partially deregulated many districts' stipends. Legislation authored by the Chairman of the Senate Agriculture and water Resources Committee raised water districts' stipends to $100 a meeting and then allowed the districts to boost these stipends if they adopt local ordinances. A district's ordinance is referendable and the statute doubles the amount of time that opponents have to circulate referendum petitions from the usual 30 days to 60 days (SB 1370, Ayala, 1984) . In 2000, the Legislature extended these procedures to sanitary, sanitation, and fire 0 SB 1272 -- 4/12/04 -- Page 6 districts (SB 1559, Kelley, 2000 and SB 1756, Kelley, 2000) , and later to recreation and park districts (SB 707, Senate Local Government Committee, 2001) and cemetery districts (SB 341, Senate Local Government Committee, 2003) . In 1989, the Legislature increased the number of meetings for which districts can pay stipends from 6 meetings a month to 30 meetings a month (AB 653, Jones, 1989) . Senate Bill 1272 allows special districts to pay up to $100 a day for each day's attendance at board meetings as defined in the Ralph M. Brown Act, or for each day's service as a board member when requested by the governing board. The bill limits the number of compensable days to six days a month. SB 1272 repeals the statutory provision that allows many types of special districts to increase their stipends by adopting local ordinances. V. Salaries Although rare, some districts have statutory permission to pay regular monthly salaries to their board members. For example, the Bast Bay Municipal water District can pay its board members monthly salaries of up to $600 a month, with 53 annual increases (SB 1606, Petris, 1986) . Irrigation districts that are in the electricity business can pay their board members monthly salaries of up to $600 or annual salaries of up to $15,000 (SB 1805, Kelley, 1998) . The Imperial Irrigation District can pay its directors annual salaries equivalent to the salaries of the Imperial County Board of Supervisors (SB 454, Kelley, 1997) . Senate Bill 1272 prohibits special districts from paying salaries to the members of their governing boards. VI. Expenses Some special districts' statutes allow their board members to recover their expenses. Senate Bill 1272 requires special districts' employees and board members to be reimbursed based on the Internal Revenue Service accountable plan guidelines, provided that they do file://C:\Documents%20andm/a20Settings\kyle\Ucalm/m20Settings\Temporary'/m20lntemet%20Files... 4/22/2004 SB 1272 Senate Bill-Bill Analysis Page 6 of 13 not exceed state employees' standard travel reimbursement. The bill requires that advance payments or reimbursements to special districts' governing board members moat be 0 supported by receipts for the actual amounts of the expenses. VII. Benefits For nearly 65 years, state law has allowed SB 1272 -- 4/12/04 -- Page 7 all local agencies --- including special districts --- to provide their governing board members with a wide variety of fringe benefits in addition to their stipends, salaries, or expenses (AB 2103, Desmond, 1939) . These benefit programs include group insurance for hospital, medical, surgical, disability, legal, dental, life insurance, income protection, and annuities. Local agencies can also allow their governing board members to participate in deferred compensation plans and pension trusts just like their employees. Paying benefits to former local elected officials grew from several smaller legislative decisions. By the late 1970e, some counties were already paying the premiums on group insurance benefits for former county supervisors. In 1979, the Legislature codified this practice, allowing all local agencies to pay health and welfare benefits to "retired" elected officials (AB 1742, Thurman, 1979) . Responding to an Attorney General's opinion, the Legislature clarified the law and allowed local agencies to pay health and welfare benefits to -former- elected officials (AB 2162, Thurman, 1980) who had served at least 12 years (AB 1572, Marguth, 1962) . At the request of the Los Angeles Unified School District, the Legislature reduced the minimum service to one term of office, provided that the board member paid the full coat ISE 98, Carpenter, 1982) . In 1993, the Legislature closed off access to the Public Employees Retirement System for newly elected members of school boards and special districts' governing boards, but not to city councilm:embers or county supervisors WE 53, Russell, 1993) . In 1994, responding to allegations of high (but undocumented) costa to local agencies, the Legislature imposed new restrictions on health and welfare benefits (SE 1983, Leslie, 1994) . Local agencies can provide health and welfare benefits to former elective members of their legislative bodies only under specific conditions: A local agency that provided benefits to former elective officials before January 1, 1995, cannot provide those benefits to an official to takes office after that date, unless the person pays for the benefits. file://C:\Documents%20ando/o20SettingsVryle\Local%20Settings\Temporary%20I ntemet%20Fi les... 4/22/2004 SB 1272 Senate Bill -Bill Analysis Page 7 of 13 Y- SB 1272 -- 4/12/04 -- Page a A local agency that did not provide benefits to former elective officials before January 1, 1994, cannot provide those benefits to former elective officials unless they pay for the benefits. a local agency that provided benefits to former elective officials before January 1, 1994, can continue to provide those benefits to those former elective officials. Senate Bill 1272 prohibits special districts from providing group life insurance or health and welfare benefits to members of their governing boards who are first appointed or first elected to a term of office beginning on or after January 1, 2005, "unless the person participates on a self-pay basis." SB 1272 prohibits special districts from providing retirement benefits to members of their governing boards who are first appointed or first elected to a term of office beginning on or after January 1, 2005. Comments 1. Inteority and accountability Good government requires the support of the governed. Government leaders earn their constituents- trust by acting in the public interest and behaving with integrity. But the public's treat in representative democracy is fragile; even small ethical lapses can swiftly undermine confidence in public institutions. Like Caesar's wife Calpurnia, public officials must be seen to be above reproach. Responding to legislators' concerns about the governance of special districts, SB 1272 boosts public confidence in these moat local of governments by increasing audit requirements, instituting ethics training, and protecting whistleblowers. 2. Local democracy The best medicine for democratic ills is the ballot box. Communities elect their own leaders and special districts' voters are free to change those who govern every four years. Districts are clearly the creatures of statute, but legislators don't need to meddle in the day-to-day business of running thousands of programs. SB 1272 shifts that balance by micro-managing special districts' governance. Instead of setting broad SB 1272 -- 4/12/04 -- Page 9 standards and letting local elected officials adapt them to file://C:\Documents%2Oand%2OSenings\kyle\Local°/a2OScttinP\Temporary'/o2OIntemeM/o2OFiles... 4)=004 SB 1272 Senate Bill-Bill Analysis Page 8 oX 13 fit local conditions and circumstances, the bill's detailed requirements for state supervision of audits and cumbersome whistleblower provisions are excessive. Legislators need Q to watch what they've created, but they shouldn't overreact. 3. Goose and gander The Senate Local Government Committee's interim hearing in November 2003 showed legislators that special districts are fallible. The hearing also demonstrated support for reforms that boost the public's trust in their own local governments. Some speakers asked legislators to consider extending new reforms to the other segments of local government, including the county supervisors, city councilmembers, and school districts' trustees. If limits on compensation, mandatory ethics training, and state scrutiny of audits are good ideas for the state's 3,300 special districts, then they're good for the 58 counties, 487 cities, and 1,100 school districts. If it's good for the goose, then why not the gander? 4. A culture of ethics SB 1272 provokes an age-old debate about good behavior. An ethical person living in an ethical culture has little need for external, legalistic controls. In the absence of an ethical culture, formal rules are needed to restrain bad behavior. The bill increases the procedures, standards, and rules that constrain special districts' operations. The Committee may wish to consider an alternative approach that would waive many of these new restrictions for special districts that embrace a culture of ethical behavior. If a district regularly encouraged its officers and employees to behave openly, to report lapses to neutral third-parties, and to correct problems without retribution, the district would not need to comply with the bill's extra requirements for audits, training, and whistleblowers. Instead of regulating bad behavior, shouldn't legislators encourage good behavior? S. Audit requirements By allowing the State Controller to test the quality of special districts' audits, SB 1272 follows the precedent that legislators set for school districts. If the Controller finds that a school district's auditor has missed important items, the SB 1272 -- 4/12/04 -- Page 30 Controller can ban the auditor from school district work. SB 1272 follows that precedent as well as imitating the corporate precedent for rotating lead auditors every six years. Keeping auditors on their toes should rebuild confidence in the auditing function. However, the Committee may wish to consider whether small districts can afford these new requirements. SB 1272 lets the Controller waive the rotation requirement if "no otherwise eligible auditor is available. - That's a tough standard because there's always some auditor somewhere who's available at file://C:\Documentso/o20and%20Settings\kyle\Loval%20Settings\Temporary%20Intemet%20Files... 4/22/2004 SB 1272 Senate Bill -Bill Analysis Page 9 of 13 some price. The Committee may wish to consider an amendment that requires the Controller to consider the cost of the other auditor. 0 6. Ethics training BE 1272 takes an important step towards restoring public confidence by requiring special districts' board members to regularly review their ethical obligations. But the bill's language isn't clear enough. The Committee may wish to consider amendments that: Clarify the FPPC's role in setting the course content (page 10, lines 6 and 7) . Allow officials to take local courses, not just regional or statewide programs (page 10, line 9) . Expand the listed curriculum, not just five specific sections (page 10, line 12) . Require senior executives to take training, not just board members (page 10, line 14) . Provide a clear starting time for this new requirement, perhaps within a year of taking office. The Committee may wish to consider substituting the language for special districts' ethics training that was proposed in SB 609 (Costa, 2001) . 7. Lost in transition The bills provisions that protect whistleblowers from retribution parallel the statutes that protect state employees. There are problems in translating requirements that come from a vast state personnel apparatus to apply to special districts that have only a couple of workers. The result is cumbersome requirements that local officials will have a tough time implementing. The Committee may wish to consider amendments that: Avoid duplicate reporting duties with conflicting time limits for the county auditors (page 11, line 34 and page 12, line 20) . Use consistent terms that are appropriate to special BE 1272 -- 4/12/04 -- Page 11 districts rather than "appointing authority, " "head of the employing agency, " and "personnel department." Clarify what the personnel department of a special district must do to avoid trigger "the department has issued, or failed to issue, findings" (page 13, lines 21 and 22) . s. Stipends The bill reverses a 20-year legislative policy that allows local elected officials to met their own stipends with referendable local ordinances. That action effectively cute the stipends in districts that had used current law to raise their stipends above $100 a day. It reduces the number of compensable days for some districts from 30 days to 6 days a month. A uniform, statewide approach may not work well because of the state-s diversity. The Committee may wish to consider amendments that: Limit stipends to $100 a day, but grandfather higher amounts adopted before January 1, 2004. tile://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\kyle\Local%20Setdngs\Temporary%20Intemet%20Files... 4/22/2004 SB 1272 Senate Bill-Bill Analysis Page 10 of 13 Allow larger districts and districts with larger programs to give stipends for 10 days of service not just six days a month. ' Allow districts to give stipends to directors who represent the district at public fuactions other than board meetings, provided that the director receives formal approval from the district's board of directors before the event and reports back to the board in writing at its next meeting. 9. Salaries A few special districts, mostly in the water or electricity business, have convinced legislators to let them pay flat monthly salaries to their board members. These provisions are exceptions to the implied statutory policy that elected officials are performing a public service rather than undertaking a paid career. SB 1272 bans the practice of paying salaries to elected board members by limiting districts to paying per-day subsidies. The Committee may wish to consider whether these utility operations should continue to pay salaries to their board members. 10. Expenses Reacting to the problems uncovered by the Sacramento Suburban Water District, SB 1272 requires districts' board members and employees to follow the IRS standards and state employees' travel standards when SB 1272 -- 4/12/04 -- Page 12 seeking reimbursement for their expenses. Curiously, the bill requires the board members to support their expense claims with receipts, but does not require the districts' employees to present receipts. The Committee may wish to consider an amendment that requires employees to document their expense claims with receipts, just like the board members. it. Definition The new reforms apply to -special districts" as defined in SB 1272. while the new definition is similar to some existing statutory definitions of special districts, it's limited to agencies -governed by an elected governing board- (page 7, lines 31 and 32) . The state's 252 public cemetery districts are exempt from SB 1272 because their boards are appointed to fixed terms. The nearly 50 mosquito abatement districts do not need to comply with SB 2272 for the same reason. Nor will the state's biggest special district, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The Committee may wish to consider an amendment that includes all independent special districts; those with elected board members and those with board members who served for fixed terms. file://C:\Documents%20 and%20S ettings\kyle\Local%20Settings\Temporary%201ntemet%20Files... 4/22/2004 SB 1272 Senate Bill-Bill Analysis Page 11 of 13 1 SB 1272 -- 4/12/04 -- Page 13 Support and Opposition (4/IS/04) Support State Controller Steve Neatly, California School Employees Association. Opposition California Association of Port Authorities, California Association of Public Cemeteries, California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Healthcare Association, California Special Districts Association, Mosquito and Vector Control Association of California, Public Water Agencies Group, Baker Manock & Jensen. Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation District, Bear Valley Community Services District, Big Bear Municipal Water District, Byron Bethany Irrigation District, Castaic Lake Water Agency, Chico Area Recreation & Park District, Citrus Heights Water District, Clovis Cemetery District, Coachella Valley Water District, Cucamonga Valley Water District, East Bay Municipal Water District, 81 Dorado Irrigation District, Pair oaks Recreation & Park District, Fresno Westside Mosquito Abatement District, Hayward Area Recreation & Park District, Henry Miller Reclamation District #2131, Hesperia Recreation & Park District, Hidden Valley Lake Community Services District, Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation & Conservation District, Indian wells Valley Water District, Jurupa Community Services District, Kensington Police Protection & Community Services District, Laguna Beach County Water District, Leucadia Wastewater District, Mesa Consolidated Water District, Mission Oak Recreation & Park District, Mojave Water Agency, Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District, Monte Vista Water District, Mt. View Sanitary District, Murrieta County Water District, North Merin Water District, Olivenhain Municipal water District, Oxnard Harbor District, Paso Robles Cemetery District, Placer Consolidated Fire Protection District, Placer Mosquito Abatement District, Plain View file)/C.\Documents%2Oand0/02OSettings\kyleU ocal0/02OSeuhW\Temporary`/,2ointemeW,2oFiles... 4/22/2004 SB 1272 Senate Bill-Bill Analysis Page 12 of,13 Water District, Public Cemetery District No. 1 of Kern County, Reclamation District No. 2068, Richardson Bay 1, Cemetery District, Rio Alto Water District, Rockville Cemetery District, Rowland Water District, Running Springs Water District, San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District, San Diego County Water Authority, San Jacinto Valley Cemetery District, San Joaquin River exchange Contractors Water Authority, San Juan Water District, Santa 0 SB 1272 -- 4/12/04 -- Page 14 Clara Valley Water District, Selma Cemetery District, South Tahoe Public Utility District, Squaw Valley Public Service District, Summit Cemetery District, Sweetwater Authority, Tulelake Irrigation District, Tulare Irrigation District, United Water Conservation District, Vallecitos Water District, Valley-Wide Recreation a Park District, Valley of the Moon water District, Vallecitos Water District, Vista Irrigation District, Walnut Valley Water District, Yorba Linda Water District, Yuba County Water Agency. file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\kyle\Local%20Settings\Temporary%201ntemet%20Files... 4/22/2004 I LAW OFFICES OF _ --�- WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION r MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: April 22, 2004 RE: Sanitary Sewer Service Charges Letter of Protest—Mr. Ray Littrell Mr. Littrell, by e-mail, has lodged his protest of the annual sewer service charge for two (2) primary reasons. His e-mail is enclosed in your agenda package for your information and consideration. First, as you know, the fees have been adopted by enactment of Ordinance No. OCSD— 20, in July 2003. However, the Board is considering on this April agenda, a reaffirmation of its prior decision and findings that the fees are necessary, and based on the financial and engineering reports do not exceed the cost to provide the service. The Director of Finance has, under separate cover, provided a detailed explanation to all of the points of concern raised by Mr. Littrell. The Board should receive and file the correspondence into the record, and consider the letter in making its decision in setting the rates for Fis/nccal Year 04-05. THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:jlo Enclosure AMSA MU 04.05 April 1, 2004 Page 2 The Checklist's five action areas combined with a process of"assess, interpret,plan,implement and measure progress"will assist utility leaders in developing a plan of what to do in addressing the changing workforce. The Changing Workforce publication also provides a bibliography section,which lists additional resources that address workforce issues—from fostering a learning environment and generational differences to creating a high performance environment and identifying what workers want from employers. FENCLOSURE tional co ies of The Changing Workforc may be purchased using the enclosed order form or online MSA's Bookstore, nip: vww.amsa-c a water.org/pubs/index.cfm. Please contact Lisa Headley, A's Managing Director of Member and Internal Services,with any comments or questions on The ging Workforce. . . Crisis and Opportunity publication,phone: 202/933-3692,e-mail: dley@amsa-cleamvater.org. —The Changing Workforce... Crisis&Opportunity Wes— � cmo'Y• Cam t e-a @ � r� _ Sg3• �` � � LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MEMORANDUM TO: Chair and Members of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE: April 22, 2004 RE: Sanitary Sewer Service Charges Letter of Protest— Mr. Ray Littrell Mr. Littrell, by e-mail, has lodged his protest of the annual sewer service charge for two (2) primary reasons. His e-mail is enclosed in your agenda package for your information and consideration. First, as you know, the fees have been adopted by enactment of Ordinance No. OCSD— 20, in July 2003. However, the Board is considering on this April agenda, a reaffirmation of its prior decision and findings that the fees are necessary, and based on the financial and engineering reports do not exceed the cost to provide the service. The Director of Finance has, under separate cover, provided a detailed explanation to all of the points of concern raised by Mr. Littrell. The Board should receive and file the correspondence into the record, and consider the letter in making Its decision in setting the rates for Fiscal Year 04 -05. THOMAS L. WOODRUFF GENERAL COUNSEL TLW:jlo Enclosure is&vle\Local Kyle, Penny V' From: Ray/Marilyn Liltrell (littmlls@"btv.net] Sent: Thursday,April 08,2004 12:22 PM To: Iittrells@webtv.net Subject: Annual sewer fees; please distribute for meeting in April To: The elected officials serving on the Orange County Sanitation District. Subject: Protest of the annual sewer fees,collected by the property tax bill. My name is Raymond T. Littrell resident of OCSD I do protest the rate increase of your annual sewer fees, for the following reasons. Article 13 D sec 4 of the state constitution states that the fee must be proportional to the special benefit received supported by an engineer"s report. 1. Numerous governmental properties receive benefits without paying of fees. 2. The required engineer's report, I believe is fatally Flawed for the following reasons, A. They have completed the report and have assigned certain levels of fees for certain levels of concentrations of SOD mgl, SS mgl and assumed flow GPD. Then assigned an assessor code which is a certain percentage of the (SFR)single family residence for the SFR the assessor code is 2 one residence is 100%it has concentration of 206 SOD mgl,219 SS mgl,assumed flow 253 gpd to show a comparison on this system. A duplex was assigned an assessor code of 10 duplex only with concentrations of SOD 206 mgl. SS 209 mgl, and assumed flow is 177 gpd,as can be seen concentrations for SFR and Duplex are the same or SOD 206 and SS 219 but water flow differs 253 SFR and 177 for duplex,which is 70% for each unit in the duplex of the SFR. The report did assigned a 70%of SFR cost to each unit of the duplex,this seems fair,the concentrations were the same and water flow was 70%of the SFR. Now consider concentrations of 216 SOD mgl,245 SS mgl and assumed flow rate of 99 gpd , one would think any assessor code that was getting that level of service would all have the same fee. Now look at assessor codes 21,22, 23,24, 36.39,48,57,83,84,85.and 86 all have this same level of service and should be charged the same fee. However these fees range from$27.00,$41.00 to$151.00 perl,000 thousand sq. ft. This cause's the assessor code 48 convenience market to pay$151.00 per 1,000 sq.ft.and assessor code 47 super market which has a definition of has a bakeryfbutcher shop etc to pay$151.00 per 1,000 sq.ft. This is but one reason I believe the engineer's report is fatally flawed. Other problems with the system are, 1. Public schools are being charged by the student and school admin building not charged at all, none of this is addressed in OCSD's Ord 20. 2. Some users being are charged by water usage also not in Ord 20. 1 3. Many mobile home parks is then mobile homes not charged right for OCSD fees. V' 4. Many assessor codes are outdated making the fees charged wrong. 5. Look at assessor code 112 Steel building, How can you tell sewer usage by the material used in construction? For the above reasons I protest the fee increase until the engineered report is corrected and the other above items addressed,please don't add insult to injury by adding adding additional fees. Thank you Ray L*ell 12091 Blackmer Garden Grove,Calif. 714-892-1082 2 4 April 22, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: Blake P. Anderson General Manager FROM: Gary Streed Director of Finance SUBJECT: Citizen Protest of Sanitary Sewer Service User Fee Program A citizen of Garden Grove has submitted a written protest of the District's user fee program and asked that it be distributed to the Board of Directors. This memo will address the Issues raised. The District's Sanitary Sewer Service User Fee program is adopted in accordance with all provisions of the State constitution. Special attention has been ghen by the Board of Directors to complying even with provisions that may not be required. The adopted rate schedule is proportionate to use and has been approved by the State of California. An Engineers Report was prepared and adopted by the Board in 1999 when the rate structure was modified. While it is true that certain parcels owned by governmental agencies are not currently charged for sewer use, that Is not a flaw in the rate structure. Clearly all parcels connected to the sewer are to be charged. The flaw is in the data base that is used to generate the annual charges. The data base for parcels owned by governmental agencies does not include the square footage of buildings on the parcel in many cases. Because the rate structure for non-residential properties is based in part upon the size of the building, no charges are generated in these Instances. This flaw can be resolved by a review of all parcels that are not charged. The analysis of the charges for a single family residence versus the charges for a duplex is accurate. It is important to note the charge for a duplex is based upon the number of units, so the total per parcel is twice the rate that Is shown as 70%of the SFR rate. This matches the flow per unit comparison and the equivalent strength of the waste water from these two similar types of uses. The logic of the citizen's analysis of the non-residential code charges is on point, but the result is faulty because we supplied him with a copy of an internal worksheet that contained an error. The Ordinance and the rates therein are correct and are not based upon that worksheet. The intent of the rate structure is that users with similar flow and strength characteristics will pay the same rate. The staff worksheet had not been updated for changes in the flow per thousand square feet reported for three categories of use and changes in strength of discharge for two of those same categories. r The problems in the spreadsheet can be seen in the following table. Codes 36, 48 and 85 were all reported to be 99 gallons per 1,000 square feet, but the actual rate in the Ordinance was based on a different flow. The strength of discharge was reported was also incorrect for codes 48 and 85. These changes were made subsequent to the original Engineer's report based upon work by a consultant in 1999-2000 and refund requests based upon actual water use. Code Description BOD SS Flow % of SFR in Should Be Ordinance 21 Auto Dealer 215 245 99 41% 22 Auto Repair 215 245 99 41% 23 Auto Service 215 245 99 41% 24 Used Car Lot 215 245 99 41% Financial Bldg 39 Golf Course 215 245 99 41% onvenience MkJ 57 M/cycle Bldg 215 245 99 41% 83 Auto Service Stn 215 245 99 41% 84 Marine Sery Stn 215 246 99 41% 86 Sery Stn & Mkt 215 245 99 41% Five additional problems are cited in the attached protest. 1. Staff has not been aware of public school administration buildings not being charged. That is not the intent of the program or the Ordinance. The schools themselves are charged through the Superintendent of Schools office based upon the Average Daily Attendance for each school. The administrative facilities should be charged as an office building. 2. The Ordinance allows users to petition for an adjustment to the service fee based upon the square feet of their building if they can demonstrate a lesser use. Water purchased has been established as a reasonable indicator of sewage discharge in these cases. 3. It appears that the citizen is correct about some mobile homes not being charged. The Ordinance provides for mobile homes to be charged at a per unit rate of 60% of the single family residence rate. Staff has attempted to applythis rate to the individual parcel when it is owned by an individual or to the total numberof sites when individual sites are not owned. A special effort was made a few years ago to identify and to correct the 0 billing for all mobile homes. Apparently some things have changed as the citizen's contact with staff has brought some errors to staffs attention. 4. Some Assessors Land Use Codes appear to be incorrect for our purposes. Staff and the FAHR Committee are working to find a way to evaluate every non-residential parcel for use and size of building. 5. Assessors Land Use Code 112 is for steel buildings. Our Ordinance treats these buildings the same as mini-warehouses. The current annual rate is$7.00 per 1,000 square feet of building and there are approximately 150In our service area. The District has reviewed 7 of these and will review the rest as a part of the study. It is worth noting that prior to the rate structure change in 1999 there was only one category of non-residential users. Every non-residential user was charged the same rate per 1,000 square feet. The attempt to provide a rate structure that provided more accuracy and was more closely aligned with use has also created a rate structure with more opportunities for error. The study currently being evaluated by the FAHR Committee will address and resolve may of these inequities. GGS:jt NeadWata2\wp.dta�admin\GMFORMSNEMO.BPAM ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT T' April 21, 2004 phone: (714)962-2411 To the Chair and Members I°•l p141962 tal of the Board of Directors www aacul.mm Subject: Board Letter Pe. Bar 6127 Poun[am Valle,P 9272e-B127 The following are items that you may find interesting. If you need additional .Great aaar.es: information on any of the items, please call me. ID944 e Valley Fwn 92 Valley. 19 92)OBaet9 Free Compost for Our Member Agencies M nhe Agencies In March, we delivered a truckload of Synagro's biosolids-based compost to the ta • City of Tustin, encouraged by Tustin Mayor Tony Kawashima. Synagro and C1C1es OCSD are now announcing a compost use program for all OCSD member agencies. One truckload will be delivered to any member agency free of charge to anaha,m encourage agencies to try this great compost product. After that, Synagro will Bran share Pare offer a special rate for OCSD's member agencies along with periodic promotional Lyprxss offers. Faunal Valley Fulfa,um Garden Grass This is a wonderful opportunity to bring our biosolids-based products back to Handngran Beach Orange County to improve in-county organics recycling! We think this is the start Irvine Le Hoorn of something big. Please join in and help to promote in-county recycling efforts. La Palma L°:rt Beach S a ro is currently OCSD's compost contractor with facilities in Riverside County, NeLee A Beach Yn 9 Y P Orange California and La Paz County, Arizona. A long-term contract for a new Synagro Placendn compost facility in Kem County will be considered b the Board in April 2004. sears Ane P tY tY Y P Seal Beach ant°^ Visit www.ocsd.com/info/biosolids/compost.asi)for more information. And talk to r sun una Park our favorite compost poster child, Tony. y°rca Lnde county or orange We Received Two Notices of Violation regarding our Underground Storage sanitary Districts Tanks l Mena On November 18,2003, the Orange County Health Care Agency sent us a Notice M alway Go, of Violation (NOV)for noncompliance with the California underground storage tank Water Districts (UST) regulations at both treatment plants. We have a number of tanks at both Inane Ranch plants to provide fuel for our fleet vehicles, for our Central Generation facilities, and for standby engines. We responded with a plan to complete the repairs by December 15, 2003. All of those repairs were not completed and we were issued a second NOV on April 5, 2004 for continued noncompliance. Our failure to carry out our underground storage tank remediation plan led to the second NOV. Also, the Health Care Agency cited us in two areas: 1) the continued operation of four non-permitted tanks that provide fuel for our critically- TO mamtam worldclass Ieadill in wastewater and water rssouras management. r Board of Directors Page 2 of 7 April 21, 2004 needed emergency generation equipment; and, 2) improperly moving a monitoring probe located at the bottom of an underground equipment access vault. The probe was raised slightly off the bottom of the vault to avoid incorrectly reading water condensation as leaking fuel, but the regulations don't permit us to do so. We have looked at the reasons behind our failure to meet the December 2003 deadline and conclude that we failed to properly designate a project manager to get the job done (we were trying to manage the program by committee), and we didn't watch the contractors who did the remedial work closely enough. We have responded to the second NOV with a detailed plan of action that is acceptable to the Health Care Agency. The scheduled remedies should be completed by the first week of May 2004. Our failure to comply could lead to penalties up to $5,000 per day per tank. Regarding the improper relocation of the monitoring probe, we have informed staff about the state requirements and conducted tailgate training sessions on the proper maintenance of the probes. Staff is preparing a detailed report on the underground storage tank situation and it will be provided in your folders at the Board meeting Reports on Beach Water Contamination and Public Health Risk During the past several weeks, local newspapers have reported on scientific articles published by Dr. Stanley Grant, Dr. Sunny Jiang, and Ryan Dwight of UCI, and the"2003 Annual Ocean and Bay Water Quality Report" released by the County of Orange Health Care Agency. Staff from our Environmental Sciences Lab has written the following summary for your information: Ocean Water Bacterial Quality Three articles published by Dr. Grant were related to beach water quality and public health. One described the transport of contaminants from the watershed to the beach; a second described what happens to these contaminants once they reach the beach, and the third discussed limitations of the current notification system regarding public health risks and water quality. The paper describing transport concludes that 99 percent of a year's-worth of contaminants reaches the beach during the rainy season when runoff diversions are not in place. What the paper fails to acknowledge, however, is that public health is not really compromised, because diversions to sewers are in place during the dry parts of the year when beach use is highest and 72- hour alerts are issued after rain stones. And, while it can be argued that the highest volume of runoff occurs during storm events, its impact is very short-lived. During the 350 days a year that it doesn't rain, the diversions are in place and effectively capturing the runoff. r ' Board of Directors Page 3 of 7 April 21, 2004 The paper most emphasized by the news media is the one stating that the public is being misinformed about beach water quality. Dr. Grant argues that the health department's public notification system (signs posted on the beach) is irrelevant to water quality at the time a person enters the ocean. We believe that this argument misrepresents the meaning of signage at the beach as required by Assembly Bill 411 (AB411). The authors of AB411 understood that water quality changes over very short time periods, and that lab results from microbiological analyses lag by 24 hours. For this reason, AB 411 has two sets of standards. One standard is based on averaging multiple samples collected over a 30-day period. A second is based on a single-day sample when results are super high. The 30-day standard requires health authorities to characterize the GENERAL condition of the beach and inform the public accordingly. The super high standard initiates a host of actions that the health authorities must perform. Signs on the beach are intended to allow a swimmer to make an informed decision about whether to enter the water at that particular beach location or to move to another location without a sign. A sign or lack of a sign was never intended to represent instantaneous water quality conditions. Dr. Grant's has a suggestion of using historical data to characterize the long-term bacterial conditions of a beach and to inform the public accordingly is a good one, but that message got lost in the reporting. Viral Indicators of Water Quality Dr. Sunny Jiang released a draft of a paper that will be published in the Journal of Applied Microbiology. She reported that genetic material representing three types of human viruses was found at 11 rivers and creeks in Southern California, and that there was no correlation between the presence or absence of these virus indicators and indicator bacteria. Dr. Jiang asserts that public health is not being protected because the sanitary quality of water is assessed only by indicator bacteria and not viruses. What is left out of the report is that the analytical technique she used detects the presence of fragments of viral DNA or RNA. What this means is that she could be falsely reporting dead viruses as viable and infective. Our own laboratory and others in Southern California have attempted to develop a reliable, inexpensive, and timely method for detecting viable viruses without success—so far. Work continues in this broad area of monitoring techniques. Surfer Health Studv The final UCI paper was written by Ryan Dwight, based on research performed for his doctoral dissertation. He compared illness rates for surfers at Orange County and Santa Cruz County beaches. The Santa Cruz County beach had lower r Board of Directors Page 4 of 7 April 21, 2004 monthly averages of bacteria and lower reported illness. He concluded that there was a greater risk of getting sick at the Orange County beach, and that risk was quantified as an increase of about 10 percent for each 2.5 hours of weekly water exposure. This paper is a description of his findings and not a formal epidemiological study establishing cause and effect. In our view, the results are preliminary, at best. While we would probably all intuitively conclude that runoff in populated areas is more likely to be contaminated than runoff in less densely populated areas, the ability of scientists to quantity the difference with defendable certainty is not easily within reach. Conducting a reliable epidemiological study of this type would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, involve dozens of staff, and require extensive follow-up with thousands of beach goers. More importantly, the value of the results for establishing public policy and operational practice is untested. Finally, with respect to the observations made by Dwight, there was no confirmation of the illness by qualified medical personnel, and this reason, there could be a number of reasons for the observed differences other than surf contamination. We don't want to discount the value of the question, because it's a critical one. We simply believe that the techniques employed by the researcher are inadequate for establishing public policy. More work in this area of comparative epidemiological studies would be valuable, but very expensive to perform. Some Good News: Ocean Water Quality Improving A bit of good news about beach water quality came from the Orange County Health Care Agency in its 2003 State of the Beaches report. The report contains summary statistics indicating that county-wide lost beach days due to sewage spills and exceedences of AB 411 standards has decreased for the third consecutive year. This is attributed to improved response time to spills and to our urban runoff diversion system. Problem beaches from previous years were the same ones of concern in 2003. SCAOMD Adopts Stringent Diesel Engine Rule The South Coast Air Quality Management District recently adopted a new rule for stationary diesel engines. The reason for this new rule is that diesel particulates have been shown to be highly carcinogenic, potentially creating an especially large adverse health impact to children. There are thousands of stationary diesel engines in this air basin. We operate 18 emergency stand-by diesel engines at the two treatment plants and 4 diesel engines at our pump stations. An additional 5 more diesel engines are currently planned to be installed in the next two years as part of 3 capital projects to provide reliable standby power. Obviously, we now have to rethink this approach—and we will. r Board of Directors Page 5 of 7 April 21, 2004 All of our engines must meet this new rule by July 1, 2005, unless we restrict the number of test run hours we employ every year to check their reliability. More stringent emissions standards will go into effect between the years 2006 and 2009, requiring an 85% emission reduction. In addition to limits for diesel particulates, our engines must meet new limits for oxides of nitrogen and volatile organic compounds. These regulations are scheduled to go Into effect between 2011 and 2013. We believe that our existing diesel engines will not meet the particulate emission standards established in the rule. We will confirm this with emission source testing in May or June. The new requirements may require that we install new pollution control equipment costing up to$4 million (in total)for our 18 engines. We do have an alternative under the new rule:test run our standby engines less than 20 hours per year. And, we can run them without time limits during an actual emergency. We are evaluating this option. Obviously, we need to think about this. If we can't adequately lest run our standby engines from year-to-year, then how will we know that they will be reliably available when we them? Staff has a game plan. First, we will conduct emission testing of our engines to determine their current compliance status. Second, we will check for the availability of reliable particulate control equipment. Third, we will model the impact from our diesel engines on theoretical health risk to the surrounding communities and report the results to the board and to the community. And, fourth, we will develop reliable cost estimates for complying with the rule. If the long term health risk to the public is too high or the cost of retrofitting our diesel engines is Impractical, then we may have to use a different long term approach for providing reliable standby power. We hope to provide a compliance strategy to the board in September. 2004 Children's Water Education Festival Expedition The Children's Water Education Festival Expedition, sponsored by the Orange County Water District, will be held on Wednesday, May 12, 2004, between 11 a.m. and 1 p.m. at Hidden Valley Park, 8800 Irvine Center Drive, Irvine. Huell Howser is the Master of Ceremonies and Denis Bilodeau, Orange County Water District, Manny Grace, The Walt Disney Company, and Wayne Nastri, US EPA are guest speakers. Included in the Expedition is a walking tour of the festival, an event for 7,000 Orange County third and fourth graders, and a luncheon. If you are interested in attending, RSVP to Rebecca Long at 714 378-3362 or by e-mail at rlonc@ocwd.com. Board of Directors Page 6 of 7 April 21, 2004 2005 Economic Forecast Conference Mark your calendars now for the 2005 Economic Forecast Conference, scheduled for Tuesday, October 26, 2004, at the Hyatt Regency Irvine between 7-10 a.m. Breakfast will be served. The Economic Forecast Conference is presenting the tenth joint conference between Cal State Fullerton's College of Business and Economics and the Orange County Business Council. This annual conference is to inform the Orange County business community of economic issues and concerns for future growth and development, identifying industry trends and focusing on key industry clusters. This conference attracts over 700 attendees and many corporate sponsors. Proceeds support Cal State University, Fullerton and the Orange County Business Council. Secondary Treatment Standards Update All operationally available secondary treatment facilities are online. Staff continues to make in-plant adjustments and improvements to existing processes to advance toward secondary treatment standards. The final effluent is a blend of 67 percent secondary treatment and 33 percent primary treatment, which is above our target of 64 percent secondary treatment. During the 12 months prior to the Board's decision of July 17, 2002, the District's final effluent quality averaged 51 ppm TSS and 72 ppm BOD. During February 2004, the final effluent averaged 37 ppm TSS and 63 ppm BOD versus the secondary treatment goal is 30/30 ppm TSS and BOD. The final effluent TSS and BOD is up slightly due to several construction projects that have taken facilities off line. These projects impacts will end in March 2004. Disinfection Update Our final effluent continues to be successfully disinfected using the temporary facility disinfection system, which has now been in operation since August 2002. The disinfection system is significantly reducing the total coliform, fecal coliform, enterococci bacteria and viruses. March 2004 results for total coliform averaged about 7,220 MPN/100 mL, which is substantially below the final effluent goal of 180,000 MPN/100 mL. The final effluent had a maximum 0.22 ppm chlorine residual averaged over eight hours on one day, which is well below the 1.45 ppm daily maximum compliance limit. Additional disinfection data is reported on the Web @ www.ocsd.com. These upgraded bleach and dechlorination facilities will be used until the District has determined the long-term technology that will be used for disinfection. Board of Directors Page 7 of 7 April 21, 2004 Education and Outreach In our continuing effort to inform the public regarding environmental issues and promote careers in wastewater as part of our education and outreach goals, OCSD participated in three special events during the month of April. • Earth Day Expo at Orange Coast College in Costa Mesa on April 22 - hosted an information booth focusing on environmental issues and careers in wastewater. • Arts Festival Day at the La Habra Children's Museum in La Habra on April 24 - helped conduct activities at the Clear Water Mountain exhibit. • Earth Day Celebration at Golden West College in Huntington Beach on April 29 - hosted an information booth focusing on environmental issues and careers in wastewater. In addition, two tours were conducted, one for a high school disadvantaged youth community service program and the other for a university environmental economics class. Articles of Interest I have also included several additional published articles that you might find interesting. If you would like additional information on any of the above items, please call me. Blake P. Anderson General Manager BPA:jt H NEP MIMGMLETTERS TO THE EOARD M2SM MO DLTR.00C Attachments r alll/ SYNAGNO OCSD Bi6solids A Hoi✓hAlun,nwxv 0-M, Uryn, n ..I.,J.,u 4un;renvinnunu 1. OCSD Member Agency Compost Use Program Membership Agglication Applicant Information Name of OCSD Member Agency: Current Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Contact: Phone No.: E-Mall Address: Fax No.: Initial Free Load Type of product Location for Intended Use Date DeliveryNeeded Future Compost Use Projects Please Circle one Will your Agency be interested in future compost use projects? YES / NO If es, lease Intlicale the a of ro ecls below. Type of Compost Use Program r r (LandscapeT a Location• Dale Comments/Special Requests: Signature of Member Agency Representative: Date: SI nature of S na ro Re resentative: Date: SEND FORM DIRECTLY TO: SYNAGRO Attention: Lorrie Loder Mail to: P.O. Box 7027,Corona, CA 92878 Fax to: (909)277-2957 Phone: (909)322-0388 E-Mail: Iloder(d svnaero.com Official Use Only: ❑ Synagro copied to OCSO staff(Deirdre Hunter). Date: _________ Synagro Technologies, Inc. c:lloder/ocsd ma compost 4/2004 SYNAGROL OCSD Blasolids 9 A Nnid LAlovp Cmy% Urgnns grlinp hr a Wllm 1—in...... .T Orange County Sanitation District Member Agency Compost Use Program The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Member Agency Compost Use Program is designed for exclusive participation by OCSD Member Agencies. This program is intended to encourage compost use among the Member Agencies and to educate the Member Agencies on the environmental benefits realized from using a natural composted biosolids soil amendment for their landscaping needs. Composting occurs naturally when carbon and nitrogen sources are properly blended, aerated and moistened. The resulting natural process of decomposition turns organic matter (such as biosolids and green waste) into a natural and useful soil amendment for any landscape or garden. Compost use improves soil texture and reintroduces important nutrients back into depleted soils, so that plants and trees can thrive in a nutrient-rich environment. Compost also improves the soil by boosting its moisture- holding capabilities. OCSD Member Agency Compost Use Program • Sign Upt In order to become involved in the program, each OCSD Member Agency must sign up for the program by filling out the attached application form and submitting it to Synagm. Contact Lome Lotter at (909) 322-0388 or sign on to www.ocsd.com/info/biosolids/compost.asp for details. • First Trial Truckload of Compost-Frost Upon completion of the membership form, the Member Agency is entitled to receive up to one free truckload (forty cubic vards) (no hidden charges), of any natural soil amendment product Synagro manufactures at the Corona Composting Facility. • Special Pricing on Future Ordersl The Compost Use Program Membership entitles the Member Agency to receive Special Pricing on future orders of a composted soil amendment used widely by landscape professionals Mansportation and/or Delivery charges will apply). • Submit Product Testimonialal Offering this great compost product at a discount will allow OCSD and Synagro to collect feedback and product testimonials from the Member Agencies involved in the program. Therefore, Member Agencies in the program agree to submit product testimonials and surveys upon request. Check out OCSD's compost webpage fty w.ocsd.com/info/biosolids/compost.aso) for other member agencies stories, projects, and ideas. Synagro Technologies, Inc. c:lloderlocsd me compost 4/2004 Qoi sYNAG1Z0 OW, SYNAGRO SYNAGRO Profnriona!Organic Sail Prodndr Profasiona!Organic Seri/Prodxar 6 Praluds That Co" Professional Organic Soil Produas All Your Nwds Established in 1991,Synagro,headquartered in Houston. Tirana, is commuted to leading the organics maturity be operating world. Created Synagm specializes in soil amendments and premium class composting facilities. Synagra Com- quality cop ,Our prima d cover for gulf courses andner Posting Company of California, Inc. repro for /�_- _ _ _ _ _ sports fields.Our primary product is nd enndltbner sentr the nation's largest promoter and dio- 1(�N. O and is acclaimed as the best soil amendment available tnbuhu ofpremium grmfuy compost. nafs for NEW landscape installations. Syn give Professio nal Organk Soo Products will save you tim & d givey 17 emoney. No other will you better y bottom-line results. f, Created by professionals for prafcssionals with a Synagrq first incur husn65 nationwide team of experts stardi ng solid]y behind f.� them, Synagra Professional Organk Soil Products bsm first— will will suryass War expectations for perfomtanec and Exdusrdy saving Calif cr ia, o results time after time. C. Resratch conducted at universities and extension Nemda & Arizaia services around the world has proven that plants grown e. W in soil amended with compost... '�PQJ6 • Ham a greater resistance topesrs and dirmses, To Place An Order • Dnrlap deeper roar.gstems, • Retain and utiBre water oadnuMentcmnre efriently.and Ca11800-242-2222 • Produce higheryields per acre than those Ext. 12 grown with commercial nitrogen ferrilirer alone. The anticipated benefits of Soil Conditioner over (1 induBettstandard amendments include: f • Largeer duration.ro.ailco conditioning ( ) • Longerdamtlol of soil conditioning 'r, • Lowercubicy yards men, r 1 S max 3 cubic yards per 1,888 sq.ft. • Higherfertilitr P.0.8mt 7027 Longersappl, ofslow-relenvenurrienes Oxon,CA 92878-7027 OCSD • Better microbial activities lahmart: 909-277-2662 Member Agency Fax: 909-277-29S7 Compost Use Program a1V/ SYNAGROL 2004 Price List ProF,Wwltlµuir S.ilPwlm SOIL CONDITIONER Bulk Products F.O.B. i Typical Compost manufactured from wood shavings, forest Pre-plant Fertilizers Price Avg.vg. LbLbg Maximum Minimum produce and organic residuals extracted from the water Per cubic ic per cubic cubic,area Delivery treatment process. Particle sin is 5/8-inch minx,. are NOT Required Yard yard per truck cubk,,d• Simply the best sell amendment available. Soil Conditioner $ 7.00 900 ss zo Application Rate General soil amendment:only 2 to 7 cubic yards per Contractor's Compost $ 8.00 800 66 20 1,000 sq.ft.,incorporated 4 to 6 inches. Top Guard 1/4" $ 11.00 800 60 20 Small containers(1.5& 15 MILL Add 10%to 15%to To Guard 1/8" (Golf Course $ 16.00 950 50 20 existing container mixes Large containers(15 gal. and larger):Add 15%to 25% TO soil $ 9.00 1,900 25 26 to existing container mixes $OII Mix $ 10.00 1,800 30 30 Backfill: Blend 25%Soff Conditioner to 75%site soil. • FOB: "Freight On Board" product loaded at SYNAGRO Composting Facility, CONTRACTORS COMPOST Corona CA - - Call for delivery rates Soil Conditioner with 1/4-inch minus removed. Use • MINIMUM ORDER FOR PICK-UP: 10 Cubic Yards; Tarps are required with heavier,slow draining soils. • QUANTITY DISCOUNT: Call for availability • TERMS: Net 30 Days upon approved credit TOP GUARD • TO ORDER: Call the SYNAGRO Order Desk 800-242-2222 Extension 12 Top Dressing/Seed Cover All pricing based on bulk truckload quantities Self Conditioner screened to 1/4-inch minus for Sports • C.O.D. Policy: MasterCard, Visa, AmExp, Company Checks/Money Orders Turf and Golf Course grade screened to 1/8-inch minus. Accepted Superior top dressing / seed cover and Hydromulch compost. Available in bulk or 1.5 cubic-foot bags (50 Iba/bas). Product Uses Application Rate Too dressing: 112 cubic yard per 1000 sq. ft. & Applications HvdroMulch: replace wood/paper fiber up to 50%. soil Conditioner X X X X X X 1 900 Contractor's Compost X X X X X X 800 TOP SOIL/SOIL MIX Top Guard 1 4" X X X X X X X X 800 Pre-amended, nutrient-rich soil blends. Comprised of Top Guard 1 8" X X 950 sandy loam soil and Soil Conditioner Q 8:1 and 3:1 Topsoil X X X 1900 respectively. 15off Mix I X X I I 1800 Application Rate Turf applications:Use as is. To Place An Order General Landscape: As is,deep water at time ofplant- ing and ample thereafter to establish plants. Call 800-242-2222, Ext. 12 ga..04 r004 4 6os`CG CEfTSQ Bryav Speeg/e Aiecrar s COUNTY OF ORANGE 3UO SawmAn;CA e o P.O.Box 4048 RESOURCES&DEVELOPMENT A ANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT S.m Ana,CA 927024048 �'LlF04a+P Telephone: (714)834-2300 F.: (714)834-5188 April 5, 2004 Mr. Blake Anderson, General Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Subject: Project Achievement Award For The Talbert- Lower Santa Ana River Watershed Urban Runoff Diversion Project Dear Blake Anderson, On behalf of the County of Orange, I wish to thank you for your contribution to the successful completion of the Talbert - Lower Santa Ana River Watershed Urban Runoff Diversion Project. This project was honored by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) County of Orange Branch on February 19, 2004 with the Project Achievement Award. The award was given to the County of Orange in recognition of outstanding contributions to engineering. Urban runoff water from the Talbert - Lower Santa Ana River Watershed is diverted to Orange County Sanitation District for treatment. Your contribution to the successful completion of the Urban Runoff Diversion projects is greatly appreciated and the certificate recognizing Orange County Sanitation District's contribution is enclosed herewith. Very truly yours Uax dridersen, PE WCRD/EBPM MA: T,©AZ,2b C£rr7 — L amsa Member , 1 1?1%s U P D A T E To: Members&Affiliates From: National Office Date: April 1, 2004 TV 'a Subject: NEW PUBLICATION RELEASE— ' THE CHANGING WORKFORCE...CRISIS& OPPORTUNITY ANAMSA/AMWA CHECKLIST Reference: MU04.05 AMSA is delighted to provide members with a complimentary copy of the newly released publication, The Changing Workforce. . . Crisis& Opportunity, as a benefit of membership. The Changing Workforce —A Hands-On Guide to a Utility Mega Trend Developed as a collaborative effort between AMSA and the Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies (AMWA), The Changing Workforce. . . Crisis& Opportunity publication focuses on the changing face of the public utility workforce,which has been identified as a mega-trend that will have a tremendous amount of impact on utility leaders in the coming years. The Changing Workforce examines the opportunity,and the potential crisis,that this"mega-trend"poses to utility leaders as the demand for qualified, skilled employees is expected to rapidly increase,while the supply is expected to decline. As"Baby Boomers" retire,utilities will be challenged to develop a new generation of staff while retaining much-needed institutional knowledge. Utility-specific data from the clean and safe drinking water communities provided much of the framework for this publication,and the actions outlined in this document are sure to generate much discussion among utility leaders. Checklist Examines Strategic Actions for Utility Leaders The"Checklist for Action", located inside the publication's front cover, provides a practical guide for"what to do now" as well as strategic actions for utilities to consider in maintaining a competitive edge in the marketplace. The top five most important strategic areas,as illustrated on the Checklist, for utilities to consider in preparation for the emerging workforce include: 1)Knowledge Retention 2)Leming Environment 3)Management and Supervisory Development 4)Management Team and Governance Board Alignment 5)Effective Communication 1816 Jefferson Place. NW. Washington. DC 20036-2505 • 202.833.2672 • 202.833.4657 FAX • http://w ..amsa.cleanwater.org 4s":e AMSA MU 04.05 April 1,2004 Page 2 The Checklist's five action areas combined with a process of"assess,interpret,plan,implement and measure progress"will assist utility leaders in developing a plan of what to do in addressing the changing workforce. The Changing Workforce publication also provides a bibliography section,which lists additional resources that address workforce issues—from fostering a learning environment and generational differences to creating a high performance environment and identifying what workers want from employers. [ENCLOSURE ditional co ies of The Changing Workforc'may be purchased using the enclosed order form or online AMSA's Bookstore, uttp: wwwater.org/pubs/indes.cfm. Please contact Lisa Headley, MSA's Managing Director of Member and Internal Services,with any comments or questions on The anging Workforce. . . Crisis and Opportunity publication,phone:202/833-3692,e-mail: adley@amsa-cleamvater.org. —The Changing Workforce... Crisis& Opportunity 17 WAY C-dD Y• � tcE - Sg3. � to / April 16,2004 ORANGE COUNTY Fire Ant Battle Put to a Vote mHomeowners will be asked in a mail-in ballot to revive the eradication program with a new tax.The measure is opposed by pest-control firms. By Dave McKibben,LA Times Staff Writer The Orange County Vector Control District on Thursday authorized a direct-mail ballot measure giving property owners the chance to reestablish funding for the red imported fire ant eradication program. The campaign to rid the county of fire ants—known for fierce bites that leave painful, itchy welts—was dropped in February after the state stopped contributing funds and district officials said they could not support the program alone. The ballot will ask property owners whether they want to pay an annual tax of about$6 to maintain existing vector control services and resurrect the fire ant program. At their next meeting in May, vector district trustees will consider specific services and the exact tax amount. Ballots will be sent to property owners in early June and must be returned by July 22, said Mike Hearst, a spokesman for the district. If the benefit assessment tax is approved, it will be added to property tax bills mailed in August. Trustee Carolyn V. Cavecche said she is typically against raising taxes but felt it necessary to vote with the 24-3 majority. 'This is a public health and environmental issue, and this is something that a public agency needs to take care of,"she said. The plan was strongly opposed by pest control operators,who charge from $50 to$100 a visit for fire ant treatment. "I don't see how they can re-create the infrastructure for[the fire ant] program for$6 a year,"said Arthur B. Cook,who represents the Pest Control Operators of California. "We'd like to work out an arrangement that involves some type of sharing of the workload"with the county. Vector control officials argued that a countywide treatment program would be cheaper and more effective than services offered by pest control operators. "Residents would not only be paying for treating their own property, but also adjacent properties,"Hearst said. "The pesticide used by private operators will kill fire ants, but not the entire colony." The ballot measure was supported by most cities as well as the nursery industry,which pays more than$2 million annually to treat and inspect plant material moving in and out of California. In a recent survey, more than 70%of 1,800 property owners said they would pay a tax of$3 to$9 a year to increase funding for vector control services.While all the district's control services were strongly favored,the fire ant program received the most support at 85%. The pests were detected in Orange County in 1998,prompting a$5.2-million eradication program that was terminated in October by the California Department of Agriculture because of the state budget crisis. Vector officials say their program was 96%successful. i "We had practically separated fire ants from the people of Orange County," Hearst said. AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DISTRICT'S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING April 28, 2004-7:00 P.M. Agenda Posting: In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District's Administrative offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary. Items Not Posted: In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b)as an emergency item or because there is a need to take immediate action, which need came to the attention of the Board subsequent to the posting of agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted in the manner as above, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. Accommodations for the Disabled: The Board of Directors Meeting Room is wheelchair accessible. If you require any special disability related accommodations, please contact the Orange County Sanitation District Board Secretary's office at(714)593-7130 at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Requests must specify the nature of the disability and the type of accommodation requested. Items Continued: Items may be continued from this meeting without further notice to a Committee or Board meeting held within five(5)days of this meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(3). Meeting Adioumment: This meeting maybe adjourned to a later time and items of business from this agenda may be considered at the later meeting by Order of Adjournment and Notice in accordance with Government Code Section 54955(posted within 24 hours). 1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance (Director Patricia Bortle) 2. Roll Call 3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) City/Agency Active Director Alternate Director Placentia Norman Z. Eckenrode Judy Dickinson Villa Park Patricia Sortie Vacant 4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary 04/28/04 Page 2 Y 5. Public Comments:All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific Rem is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. a. Report of Chair, consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager C. Report of General Counsel 7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the regular meeting held on March 24, 2004 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair. 8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS 03/15/04 03/31/04 Totals $10.640,694.27 $13,060612.70 DIRECTORS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308. you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than $250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving OCSD. This requires that you identify the contributor by name. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with OCSD. For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308, please see your Director's Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the Rem to be removed from the Consent Calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar. 04/28/04 Page 3 Y 9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. (1) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 04-11, Accepting The Proposition 13 Watershed Protection Grant for Phase II of the Fat, Oil and Great Control Study from the State Water Resources Control Board, for Phase 11 of the FOG Control Study, in an amount not to exceed $250,000; and, (2)Authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board for said Proposition 13 Watershed Protection Grant, and to comply fully with the terms and conditions specified in the grant agreement, in a form approved by General Counsel. b. Receive and file summons and complaint re Freitas v. Orange County Water District, Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC310833, and authorize General Counsel, to appear and defend the interests of the District. C. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 04-12, Appointing Representatives for the District to Act as Agents on its Behalf in the Small Claims Courts of Orange County Judicial Districts and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-27. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 11. STEERING COMMITTEE Consent Calendar a. Order draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 24, 2004 to be filed. Non-Consent Calendar b. Review and consideration of agenda items considered by the Steering Committee re the April 28, 2004 meeting. C. Consideration of items deleted from Steering Committee Consent Calendar, if any. 12. OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE (OMTS) OMTS Consent Calendar a. Order draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 7, 2004 to be filed. 04/28/04 Page 4 Y b. (1) Approve a staff-led asset management program to implement the 2002 Asset Management Strategic Plan and achieve the recommendations of the 2003 Asset Management Peer Review report; and, (2)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and enter into a sole source agreement for Asset Management Services, Job No. SP-68-02, to provide professional services related to staff mentoring and program development for a one year period for a total amount not to exceed $368,000. C. Authorize the General Manager to exercise emergency provision of Resolution No. OCSD 04-08, Article III, Section 3.03(C), and award a contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for Emergency Repairs and Modifications of four Plant 2 Underground Fuel Storage Tanks and related work, Specification No. E-2004-188 BD, for an amount not to exceed $280,000. OMTS Non-Consent Calendar d. Approve Amendment No. 7 to the Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of OCSD's Residual Solids with Synagro West, Inc., providing for a contract extension from June 30, 2004 to June 30, 2014, with two additional five-year extensions as follows, for an annual amount not to exceed $5,800,000 per year: 1) $37.62 per wet ton for Class B biosolids land applied in Maricopa County, Arizona; 2) $38.50 per wet ton of biosolids composted at the Regional Compost Facility in Corona, California; 3) $39.50 per wet ton for Class B biosolids land applied at Fort Mojave, Arizona; 4) $43.75 per wet ton of biosolids composted at Fort Mojave, Arizona; 5) $45.50 per wet ton of biosolids composted at Arizona Soils; and, 6) $49.00 per wet ton, at a minimum of 200 wet tons per day, of Class B biosolids composted at the South Kern Industrial Center. e. Consideration of items deleted from OMTS Committee Consent Calendar, if any 13. PLANNING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE (PDC) PDC Consent Calendar a. Order draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 8, 2004 to be filed. 04/28/04 Page 5 r b. Accept Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction, Job No. J-87, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. C. Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, with ARB, Inc., authorizing an addition of$182,109, and time extension of 23 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$5,424,149. d. Ratify Change Order No. 7 to Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2, with J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$194,205, increasing the total contract amount to$15,283,121. e. Receive report on Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for Treatment Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement Project, Job No. P2-66 (information only). f. Approve Amendment No. 7 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell, providing for additional engineering services for Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, for an additional amount of $992,957, increasing the total amount not to exceed $6,198,661. g. Approve Amendment No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers, providing for additional engineering services for Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60, for an additional amount of $171,786, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,393,671. h. Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates, providing for additional environmental services for Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report, Job No. J40-5, for an additional amount of$141,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $513,500. PDC Non-Consent Calendar I. Consideration of items deleted from PDC Committee Consent Calendar, if any 14. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE (FAHR) FAHR Consent Calendar a. Order draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on April 14, 2004 to be filed. b. Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 2004. C. Approve Revision 2 of SAFETY-POL-101, Injury and Illness Prevention Program, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy. d. Approve SAFETY-POL-107, Hazard Communication Policy, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Hazard Communication Program. 04/28/04 Page 6 e. Approve SAFETY-POL-108, Contractor Safety Policy, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Contractor Safety Program. f. Approve SAFETY-POL-115, Backfiow Prevention Policy, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Backflow Prevention Program. g. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 04-09, Dedicating Revenues for the Payment of Debt Obligations. h. Approve three Deferred Payment Agreements negotiated by the General Manager for the collection of all charges and fees owed for sanitary sewer service charges and industrial discharge permit fees, plus interest of 7% per annum, with Dee Shin USA, Inc., Expo Dyeing & Finishing, Inc., and Y2K Textile, Inc. I. Approve a one time only non-base building payment for the Secretary to the General Manager in an amount not to exceed $1,200. FAHR Non-Consent Calendar j. (1) That the Board of Directors authorize and implement the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for Fiscal Year 2004-05, adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD 20 in July 2003, that are subject to annual reaffirmation by a two-thirds vote. —Or (2) That the Board of Directors authorize and implement the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for Fiscal Years 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08, adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD 20 in July 2003, that are subject to annual reaffirmation by a two-thirds vote, and to repeal the requirement of reaffirmation in future years. k. Consideration of items deleted from FAHR Committee Consent Calendar, if any 15. GWR SYSTEM STEERING COMMITTEE (GWRSSC) GWRSSC Consent Calendar a. Order Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 8, 2004 to be filed. GWRSSC Non-Consent Calendar b. (1)Approve a budget amendment of$15,454,000, increasing Orange County Sanitation District's budget for the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System, Job No. J-36, to $251,660,000; and, (2) Authorize award of a construction contract by the Orange County Water District(OCWD)to J. F. Shea Construction, Inc., for construction of GWR 04/28/04 Page 7 System Advanced Water Treatment Facilities, Contract No. GWRS-2004-1, for an amount not to exceed $292,060,066, with OCWD paying $146,660,033 and Orange County Sanitation District paying $145,400,033. C. Authorize award of a construction contract by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to Layne Christensen Company, for construction of Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Facilities, Contract No. GWRS-2003-3, for an amount not to exceed $12,621,053, with OCWD and Orange County Sanitation District paying equal shares of$6,310,526.50. d. Consideration of items deleted from GWRSSC Consent Calendar, if any. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 16. Consideration of the following actions regarding environmental documentation required to approve Treatment Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement, Job No. P2-66 project: (1) Receive and file Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Treatment Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement Project, dated April 2004, prepared by Environmental Science Associates (ESA); and, (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 04-10, Certifying the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for Implementation of the Treatment Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement Project, Jab No. P2-66; Making Certain Findings relating to Environmental Effects identified in the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report;Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and Adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations. 17. Closed Session CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. a. Convene in closed session, if necessary 1. Consider General Manager's Annual Performance Evaluation and Compensation pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. 04/28/04 Page 8 2. Confer with General Counsel re Anticipated Litigation, California Government Code Section 54956.9(c): One potential case. 3. Discussion with General Manager (Designated Representative) re pay grade adjustments for Executive Management pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. b. Reconvene in regular session C. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session 18. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report. 19. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 20. Future Meeting Date: The next Board of Directors regular meeting is scheduled for May 26, 2004, at 7:00 p.m. 21. Adjournments ..............................................................................................................---..................--.....-___._.._....-..-_.-..-..-....--....------.._.....__...-......._.� ;NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of 'Directors, items shall be submitted to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days ;preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by 'Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. (General Manager Blake Anderson (714)593-7110 bandersonralomd.com ?Board Secretary Penny Kyle (714)593-7130 pkvle(docsd.wm 'Director/Engineering David Ludwin (714)593-7300 dludwinrdocsd.wm 'Director/Finance/Treasurer Gary Slreed (714)593-7550 ostreed(docsd.wm 'Director/Human Resources Lisa Tomko (714)593-7145 Itomko(odomd.wm 'Director/Information Technology Patrick Miles (714)593-7280 omilesrdocsd.wm Director/Operations 8 Maintenance Bob Ooten (714)593-7020 rooten(docsd.wm IDirector/Technicel Services Bob Ghirelli (714)593-7400 rghirelli(docsd.wm ;Communications Services Mgr. Carol Beekman (714)593-7120 cbeekman(docsd.wm 'General Counsel _ _ _ Thomas L.Woodruff 14 5642605_tlw wss-law.wm H:Weptlagenda%Boam Agendast2004 Board Agendas1042904 agenda.doc Orange County Sanitation District MINUTES BOARD MEETING MARCH 24, 2004 SANlTgT�oy Q ? � ea O -1 FCT'a� E ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Minutes for Board Meeting Page 2 03/24/04 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on January 28, 2004, at 7:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS X Shirley McCracken, Chair Bob Hernandez X Steve Anderson,Vice Chair Steve Slmonian X Don Bankhead Leland Wilson X Patricia Bortle Robert McGowan Brian Brady X Peer A. Swan X Patricia Campbell Paul Yost X Carolyn Cavecche Steve Ambriz X Alberta Christy Mike Garda X John Collins Larry Crandall X Bill Dalton Bruce Broadwater X Brian Donahue David Shawver X Michael Duvall Ked Lynn Wilson X Norman Z. Eckenrode Constance Underhill X James M. Ferryman Arlene Schafer X Cathy Green Gil Coerper X Alice B. Jempsa Marilynn M. Poe X Tony Kawashima Doug Davert X Beth Krom Christina Shea X Patsy Marshall Jim Dow X Roy Moore John Beauman X Joy Neugebauer Grace Epperson X Anna L. Piercy Tim Keenan X Tod Ridgeway Don Webb X Jim Silva Chuck Smith X Paul Walker Larry Herman STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager;Jean Tappan, Acting Board Secretary; Bob Ghirelli; Dave Ludwin; Patrick Miles; Bob Ooten; Gary Streed; Layne Baroldi; Jan Collins; Marc Dubois; Ingrid Hellebrand; Jim Herberg; Mike Moore; Lynn Redman; Paula Zeller; OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L.Woodruff, General Counsel; Don Hughes; Don Greek, Judy and Christian Redman; Greg Jewell; Darrell A. Nolte; Liz Ostoich; Linda Martin Minutes for Board Meeting Page 3 03/24/04 PUBLIC COMMENTS Darrel Nolte and Greg Jewell commented on the Orange County Register editorial on the District's decision to eliminate the 301(h)waiver and meet secondary treatment standards and the Impacts of urban runoff. REPORT OF THE CHAIR Chair McCracken asked for a moment of silence in memory of former directors Don Fox, Brea, and Paul Rykoff, Newport Beach. Chair McCracken announced the meetings scheduled for the next month, Including the March 31 special CIP Directors Workshop and the April 21 GWR special joint OCWD/OCSD Directors Workshop. Staff will provide a list of the upcoming meeting dates and times to all the directors. John Collins has been appointed to serve on the GWRS Steering Committee replacing Brian Brady., who submitted his resignation to the Chair due to extensive other commitments. REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson, General Manager, reported that the City of Tustin is the first city to use our composted biosolids on its facilities. Director Kawashima reported that Tustin received seven tons for application as mulch at one of Its parks. Mr. Anderson announced that the District, County and city managers have received a response from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board on the cities' request for an extension of the July 30, 2004 deadline to submit ordinances to establish legal authority—General Waste Discharge Requirements, for sewage collection agencies in Orange County. The Regional Board is concerned about the large number of agencies that have not participated in the OCSD- led Steering Committee efforts and the possibility that those agencies may not be making progress to meet the deadlines for the FOG control programs. The Regional Board staff stated that they were not proposing to recommend to the Board, any amendments to the current deadlines. The letter also stated that failure to submit a FOG control program and legal authority by the required deadlines will be considered violations of the Order and will be subject to enforcement action. Mr. Anderson suggested that the directors contact their city staff to ensure that progress is being made, as each permittee is now required to submit a status report by April 15, 2004 of its efforts to complete the legal authority by July 30 and the FOG control program by December 30, 2004. Mr. Anderson reported that the bids for the GWR advanced treatment facilities came in about $38 million over the engineer's estimate. Staff and the design engineers are evaluating the bid and alternatives in order to determine how to proceed. The GWRS Steering Committee will be reviewing the staff report at Its April 12 meeting and a full report will be made at the April 21 Special Directors Workshop. Mr. Anderson called the directors attention to several articles included in their folders on skyrocketing costs far building materials. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 4 03/24/04 Mr.Anderson also reported that he spoke with Steve Greenhut, Orange County Register editor, who is planning to do a follow-up article on secondary treatment and urban runoff. He provided background information and explained some of the funding issues for treating urban runoff. Bob Ooten presented a 20-year service award to Lynn Redman, Senior Plant Operator. REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL Thomas Woodruff, General Counsel, updated the Board on Senator Ortiz's bill that addresses special district governance and compensation. He will keep the directors updated as amendments are considered. There appears to be bi-partisan support for this bill. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chair ordered that the minutes of the regular meeting held February 25, 2003, be deemed approved, as written. RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify payment of claims set forth on exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS 02/15/04 02/29/04 Totals $9,706,410.97 $7,074,222.07 Director Eckenrode abstained. Director Cavecche abstained from discussion and voting on Warrant No. 59855. Director Green abstained from discussion and voting on Warrants Nos. 59947 and 59669. Abstentions were pursuant to California Government Code Section 84308. CONSENT CALENDAR 9. a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1) Receive and file petition from Eduardo Bottger requesting annexation of 1.09 acres to Orange County Sanitation District, in the vicinity of Meads Avenue and Orange Park Boulevard, in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and, (2)Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 04-06, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-41 —Bottger Annexation). b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Authorize the Orange County Sanitation District General Manager to enter into a license agreement with the County of Orange for the operation of an urban runoff diversion pump station at Orange County Sanitation District's Reclamation Plant No. 1, in a form approved by General Counsel. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 5 ' 03/24/04 COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 11. DRAFT STEERING COMMITTEE: A verbal report was presented by Director McCracken, Chair of the Steering Committee, re the March 24, 2004 meeting. Chair McCracken reported that the Legislative Affairs Committee continues to meet. The General Manager provided reports on biosolids including the loss of our Nevada site in Nye County and the very favorable comments staff has received from the Grand Jury on our biosolids management program. The Steering Committee agreed with staff recommendation that the standing committees not meet in August. The general manager and director of finance updated the steering committee on the early budget numbers for next fiscal year. The general manager reviewed the bid results for the GWRS advance water treatment system. The recent OC Register news articles and opinion piece about urban runoff and secondary treatment were discussed. The general manager is prepared to send a letter to the editor depending on what appears next. Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order the Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 25,2004 to be filed. Non-Consent Calendar B. No items considered. 12. OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE (OMTS) OMTS Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 3, 2004 to be filed. OMTS Non-Consent Calendar b. Director Jim Fenyman addressed the Board on the Biosolids Management Plan. He gave an overview of the items the OMTS Committee has been considering and provided a preview of an item to come before the Board next month and the reasons for it. A sole source agreement with Synagro, to manage up to 30 percent of the District's biosolids, will be considered at that time. 13. PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE (PDC) PDC Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order draft Planning. Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 4, 2004 to be filed. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 6 03/24/04 PDC Non-Consent Calendar b. PDC04-12 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 13 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37,with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of$784, increasing the total contract amount to$71,241,988. C. PDC04-13 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 5 to Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, Job No. 1-24, with Steve P. Rados, Inc., authorizing an addition of$409,301, Increasing the total contract amount to$31,094,779. d. PDC04-14 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Ratify Change Order No. 6 for Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No.J-35-2,with J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$142,606, increasing the total contract amount to$15,088,916. e. PDC04-15 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of$300,000 for Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction, Job No.J-87, for a total budget of$8,067,396; and (2) Ratify Change Order No. 3 to Short Tenn Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction, Job No. J-87,with J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$163,607, increasing the total contract amount to $4,395,349. f. PDC04-16 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve a budget amendment of$25,000 for Modifications to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No, 7-7-2,for a total budget of$994,000; and (2) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Modifications to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-2,with Cora Constructors, authorizing an addition of$74,292 and time extension of 33 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to $812,292. g. PDC04-21 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Pimie providing for engineering services for Primary Treatment Rehabilitation and Refurbishment at Plant No. 2,Job No. P2-80,for an amount not to exceed $5,778,518. h. PDC04-22 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Tetra Design, Inc. providing for engineering services for Laboratory Rehabilitation in Plant No. 1, Job No.J-88, for an amount not to exceed $65,655. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 7 03/24/04 I. PDC04-23 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with Spec Services, Inc. for engineering services for Gisler-Redhill Trunk Sewer Relocation— Phase 1, Contract No. 7-32-1, for an amount not to exceed $102,591. j. PDC04-24 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with RBF Consulting for engineering services for Lemon Heights Subtrunk Street Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-22-1, Tustin Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-38, and West Trunk Improvements, Contract No. 7-40, for an amount not to exceed $253,578. k. PDC04-25 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Professional Services Agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc. providing for professional services for Supplemental Secondary Treatment CEQ4 Documentation, Job No. J-40-10, for an amount not to exceed$125,840. I. PDC04-26 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc., providing for engineering services for the Effluent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives Plan, Job No. J-40-6, for an additional amount of$59.923, increasing the total amount not to exceed $393,904. M. PDC04-27 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Tran Consulting Engineers for Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 7-21, providing for additional design and construction support services for an additional amount of $152,093, increasing the total amount not to exceed $518,608. n. PDC04-28 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Cathcart Garcia von Langan for Plant Utilities Rehabilitation and Refurbishment, Job No. P2-82, providing for additional design and construction support services for an additional amount of $125,820, increasing the total amount not to exceed $754,246. PDC Non-Consent Calendar 0. Consider item deleted from PDC Committee Consent Calendar P0004-17 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: (1)Approve time extensions to Cooperative Projects Program contracts with the following cities: Brea (CP-0101), Garden Grove (CP-0206), Huntington Beach (CP-0124), Orange (CP-0129 and CP-0130), and Sunset Beach Sanitary District (CP-0213); and (2)Approve Minutes for Board Meeting Page 8 i 03/24/04 additional funding for the FY 2003-04 Cooperative Projects Program in the amount of$1,365,000, increasing the total FY 2003-04 funding to$1,540,000 and the total program since inception to an amount not to exceed $18,751,736. Director Collins abstained. 14. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE (FAHR) FAHR Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on March 10, 2004 to be filed. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of February 2004. The directors asked Gary Streed, Finance Director, to keep them apprised of issues involving PIMCO. C. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 04-07,Adopting Policies and Procedures for District's Records Management Program, Records Retention, and Destruction of Obsolete Records, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 03-06. FAHR Non-Consent Calendar d. FAHR-04-19 MOVED AND SECONDED: Approve the use of planned recruitments,on an as needed basis, to fill key positions within the organization where an individual holding a key position has a specific termination date previously established and has submitted a letter of resignation. 2) Approve the use of a "Planned Recruitment Position Pool" administered by the Human Resources Department within the Division 540 FTE budget. 3) Approve the revisions to Recruitment Policy B150.00. Concerns were expressed about the payment of double salaries and the motion was amended as follows: MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Approve the use of planned recruitments, on an as needed basis, to fill key positions within the organization where an individual holding a key position has a specific termination date previously established and has submitted a letter of resignation. Minutes for Board Meeting Page 9 03/24/04 2) Approve the use of a"Planned Recruitment Position Pool" administered by the Human Resources Department within the Division 540 FTE budget, for an annual cost amount, not to exceed $75,000. 3) Approve the revisions to Recruitment Policy B150.00 related to the above. Director Bankhead voted NO on the motion. e. FAHR04-22 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 04-08, Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Award of Purchase Orders and Contracts;Award of Public Works Project Contracts; Award of Professional Services Contracts; and Delegation of Authority to Implement Said Policies and Procedures; and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 99-23. At the request of a Director, several nonsubstantive wording changes were requested. The wording of the resolution was changed to eliminate ambiguities and clerical issues. No dollar amounts were changed. Director Cavecche voted NO on the motion. 15. COOPERATIVE PROJECTS GRANTS AD HOC COMMITTEE CPG Ad Hoc Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order Cooperative Projects Grants Ad Hoc Committee Minutes for the meeting held on January 21, 2004 to be filed. 16. GRW SYSTEM STEERING COMMITTEE (GWRSSC) GWRSSC Consent Calendar a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Order Groundwater Replenishment System Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on February 9, 2004 to be filed. b. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Contract No. GWRS-2003-5, Groundwater Replenishment System Unit 1 Pipeline Project: (1) Find that pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Section 15164 that some minor changes or additions to the Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) on the Groundwater Replenishment System certified in Minutes for Board Meeting Page 10 03/24/04 March 1999 are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Public Resources Code Section 21166 and/or in Section 15162 have occurred that would require the preparation of a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration; (2)Approve Addendum No. 3 to the EIR/EIS prepared by Environmental Science Associates; and (3)Authorize award of a construction contract by the Orange County Water District(OCW D)to Ken Thompson, Inc., for construction of Groundwater Replenishment System Unit I Pipeline Project, Contract No. GWRS-2003-5, for an amount not to exceed $26,673,000, with OCWD and OCSD paying equal shares of$13,336,022.50. GWRSSC Non-Consent Calendar C. No items considered. NON-CONSENT CALENDAR 17. There were no Non-Consent Items considered. 18. CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6: The Board convened in closed session at 9:03 p.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to discuss Agenda Item 18(a)(3).only. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committees Closed Meetings. There was no consideration or discussion on Agenda Items 18(a)(1), -(2) and -(4)• RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION: At 9:45 p.m., the Board reconvened in regular session. There were no reportable actions taken. ADJOURNMENT: The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Je appan A it Secretary of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Claims Paid From 02MI104 to 02116104 Warrant No. Vander Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrants 59372 Mark Castillo $ 30,000.00 Cie.Ss8lement 59373 Dell Direct Sales,L.P. 43,107.99 (26)Continuum;&Hardware 60374 Orange County Sanitation District 856,621.69 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 69375 Airgas Safety,Inc. 103.90 Safety Supplies 59376 Allied Packing&Rubber,Inc. 73.92 Mechanical Supplies 59377 Alksk Circuit.Inc. 91.78 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59378 AAA Powerhouse Container,Inc. 343.00 Automotive Parts&Supplies 59379 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 107.07 Telephone Service 59380 B.Braun Medical.Inc. 7,675.36 Reconcllla6on User Fee Refund Program 59381 Court Order 150.00 Wage Gamishment 59382 Consumer Pipe&Supply Co. 372.16 Plumbing Supplies 59383 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 11,700.00 Construction-Raising of(39)Manholes to Grade 59384 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 59385 Delphi Connection Systems 2,148.41 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59386 Norman Eckenrode 679.06 Meeting7fmining Expense Reimbursement 59387 Electra-Bond,Inc. 9,859.12 Bonding Services-Auger Assembly Parts 59388 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 9,765.97 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 59389 Court Omer 446.00 Wage Garnishment 59390 Farm Pump&Irrigation 20,996.00 Construction-Repair of Wells at Kings County Property 59391 Franchise Tax Board 100.00 Wage Garnishment 59392 Franchise Tax Board 109.00 Wage Garnishment 59393 City of Fullerton 179.24 Water Use 59394 Guy L.Warden&Sons 153.44 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 59395 City of Huntington Beach 20,870.19 Water Use 59396 Industrial Metal Supply 680.73 Metal 59397 Internal Revenue Service 500.00 Wage Garnishment 59398 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,808.75 Dues Deduction 59398 Irvine Ranch Water District 3.65 Water Use 59400 ITT Cannon Electric 18,667.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59401 J.J.Keller&Associates 695.00 On-Line Safety Management Service 59402 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 890.00 Human Resources Meeting Registration 59403 Maruchan,Inc. 8,119.28 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59404 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 3,676.60 Mechanical Pane&Supplies 59405 Midway Mfg,&Machining Co. 668.05 Mechanics l Parts&Supplies 59406 National Bond&Trust 2,108.91 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 69407 OCEA 659.36 Dues Deduction 69408 Court Omer 40.00 Wage Gamishment 59409 Parker Motion&Controls Sales 483.56 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 59410 Court Omer 296.00 Wage Gamishment 69411 Peace Officam Council of CA 1.566.00 Dues Deduction 59412 PenVelve 27.96 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 59413 Printronix,Inc. 51.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59414 Prudential Overall Supply 1,432.82 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59415 Rayne of Orange County 1,630.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 1W21wk E(HIBITA RM.wrYMCEL4tet229WP8R415tBGklms Pap Repodg3e41Ck0me Peld Report-021504xa Page I of &t&29m Claims Paid From 02101104 to 0211Fi104 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 59416 Ricoh Electronics 604.07 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59417 RS Hughes Co,Inc 58.76 Paint Supplies 59418 Science Applications Intl.,Corp. 12,515.95 Ocean Monitoring MO 6-8-94 59419 City of Seal Beach 260.00 Permit Fees-J-73-2 59420 Shuraluck Sales&Engineedng 54.28 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 59421 Smardan Supply Company-Fountain Valley 88.91 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 59422 Smith{mart'Company 5,288.50 Soils,Concrete It Omer Materials Testing 59423 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 59424 Summit Steel 131AI Metal 59425 Sunset Environmental 72.83 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59426 Sunset Environmental 1.149.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59427 SBC 96.02 Telephone Services 69428 Thompson Industrial Suppy,Inc. 3,924.61 Mechanical Supplies 59429 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 115.00 Elevator Maintenance 59430 Todds Enterprise 8,520.71 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59431 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions 69432 Valley Splicing Co. 1,200.00 Equipment Repair 69433 Verizon California 821.22 Telephone Services 59434 Wintec,L.L.C. 25.21 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59435 Court Order 597.50 Wage Garnishment 69436 Carol T.Beekman 316.88 MeetingfTraining Expense Reimbursement 69437 Robed P.Ghirelli 494.00 MeetingRmining Expense Reimbursement 59438 Randy E.Manis 725.27 Meeting7Training Expense Reimbursement 59439 Michael D.Moore 391.30 MeetingRraining Expense Reimbursement 59440 Christopher M.Pelletier 160.00 Meeting7rmining Expense Reimbursement 59441 Southern California Edison 55,118.66 Power 59442 Acrobun,Inc.82 83.74 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59443 Automolrve Wheels,Inc. 3,000.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59444 Boeing Company,The 5,151.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59445 Brea Community Hospital 3,888.93 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59446 Classic Plating,Inc. 97.91 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 69447 South Coast Grouse 3,000.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59448 James C.Mullins 608.06 Mealing/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 59449 American Express 37.295.71 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 59450 Antek Instruments,L.P. 44,721.56 Lab Instrument-Gas Chemilumineacent Detector 59451 Basic Chemical Solutions,L.L.C. 27.839.64 Sodium Bisulfde&Caustic Soda 59452 Black&Veatch Corporation 38.984.25 Engineering Services J-71-3,J-77,J-87&P2.85 59453 Blue Cross of California 328,319.09 Medial lnsumnce Premium 69454 Boyle Engineering Corporation 53.42522 Engineering Services 7-23-1.1-24&6-13 59455 Brown&Caldwell 64.496.76 Professional Services 1.98 59456 Califomts Soil Products 55,834.14 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 59457 Camp Dresser&McKee,Inc. 95.037.26 Engineering Services J-71.8 59458 Campo Engineers 28,526.00 Prof.Sews.-Micro08retion Demo.Proj.&Coordinated Commit.Enterprise Study 59459 Communications Performance Group.Inc. 39.868.60 Prat.Servs.-Emergency Response Plan&Hazardous Energy Control Proadums 69450 Computer Protection Technology,Inc. 39,457.71 Computer Maint Agreement nw2lm IXHIBITA RldepMnl CEL41ar22WNPSIUREW1ffim said RepoM0Z0hCbM6 Peld Ropm-@1SO4ab Page 2 of Y12/2(100 Claims Paid From 02/01/04 to 02/16104 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 59461 Delta Dental 57,105.14 Dental Insurance Plan 59462 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 127,226.00 Painting Maint.Services MO 4-22-98 59463 Hach do Ponton Industries 32,969.18 Lab&Instrument Parts&Supplies 59464 J.D.Edwards 47.410.00 Software License Fees MO 7-24-96 59465 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 51.531.45 Medical Insurance Premium 59466 Kemimn Pacific,Inc. 80,648.76 Ferric Chloride NO 9-27-95 59467 Municipal Water Dist of Orange County 88,770.93 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 59468 Orange County Water District 966,070.30 Joint GWRS Pmject J-36 59469 Pacific Investment Management Co. 206,630.D0 Investment Management Service Res.95-97 59470 Pioneer Americas,Inc 180.663.02 Sodium Hypochlorite 59471 Propipe 39,187.05 CCTV Sewerine Inspection 59472 So.Cal.Gas Company 33.999.00 Natural Gas 59473 Tile Ranch/Magan Farms 142,632.92 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 59474 U.S.Metro Group.Inc. 26,235.00 Janitorial&Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 &2 59475 U.S.Peroxide,L.LC. 26,792.79 Hydrogen Peroxide 59476 Waste Markets 34.011.54 Maint.Agreement-Gm&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed Mail.Removal 69477 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 30.87327 Engineering Service J-67 59478 DenBoer Engineering&Construction 169,011.00 Construction SP44 59479 J F Shea Construction,Inc 576,863.34 Construction P2.85,J-71-3,J-35-2&J-87 59480 J R Filanc Construction 1,018,57825 Construction Pi-76 59481 Margate Construction,Inc. 1,505,180.00 Construction P1-37 59482 Manow-Meadows Corp. 128.812.00 Construction P2-47-3 59483 S.S.Mechanical Corp. 50,013.01 Construction J40-6 59484 Southern Contracting Company 30,520.00 Construction J-33-1A 59485 Orange County Sanitation District 30.614.07 Worker's Comp.Reimb. 59486 Absolute Standards,Inc. 330.00 Lab Paris&Supplies 59487 Acmpdnt Time Recorder Company 47.26 Stationery&Office Supplies 59488 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 1,261.16 Engine Parts&Supplies 59489 Advanced Sealing&Supply Co.,Inc. 1,082.40 Packing Materials 59490 Agilent Technologies,Inc. 840.95 Lab Paris&Supplies 59491 Airborne Express 65.46 Air Freight 59492 Airce Filter Service 1,199.25 Air Filters&Oil Filters 59493 Airgas Safety,Inc. 1,437.33 Safety Supplies&Equipment 59494 Alhambra Foundry Co.,Ltd. 1,901.79 Manhole Frames&Covers 59495 American Chemical Society 144.00 Membership 59496 American Fiidelily Assurance Company 66.00 Employee Cancer Insurance 59497 American Training Resources,Inc. 1,074.62 Safety Videos 59498 Applied Industrial Technology 27.57 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 59499 Archie Ivy,Inc. 3,877.00 Construction-Road Repairs 59500 Arizona Instrument 745.00 Instrument Paris&Supplies 59501 Automatic Timing&Controls 370.74 Printer Repairs 59502 AIHce American Industrial Hygiene Confer 555.00 Human Resources Meeting Registration 59503 API Fund For Payroll Education,Inc. 989.00 Acceunfing Tminmg Registration 59504 ABBE American Sac.of Safety Engineers 140.00 Membership 59505 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 511.17 Telephone Conference Services fi eonc IXHIBITA H:WeprvNvD(CEL tl1e122papaH4RElL1aMS Paid RappriVl3011Cdinu Paid Report-021500xk Page 30f9 y122p04 Claims Paid From 02J01104 to 02JI6104 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 59506 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 71.55 Telephone Service 59507 AT&T Wireless Services-Airtime 3,978.66 Cellular Airtime 5950E AT&T Wireless Services 2.773.55 Wireless Phone Services 59509 AWSI 348.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 59510 Baker Tanks 560.00 Tank Rentals 59511 Battery Specialties 1,125.43 Batteries 59512 BioMerieux Walk,Inc. 1.078.66 Lab Supplies 59513 BoutwelfFay&Fabricent,L.L.P. 526.00 Legal Services-401a Plan 59514 Bienniag West,Inc. 1.238.44 Janitorial Supplies 59515 Bush&Associates,Inc. 3,268.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 59516 BC Wre Rope&Rigging 690.41 Mechanical Pens&Supplies 59517 BEAC-Board of Environmentzl,Heath 150.00 Membership 69518 C.S.U.F.Foundation 10,816.25 Membership-Center for Demographic Research 59519 Celgornla Auto Collision 2,593.99 Vehicle Repairs-V455 59520 Martin Boyer Co.,Inc.cJo Cambridge 6.260.00 Professional Services-Workere'Compensaflon Claims 59521 Career Track 63.00 Purchasing Meeting Registration 59522 Conlon-Bales Company 398.03 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 59523 Charles P.Crowlsy Co. 1,433.26 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 59524 City of Buena Park 1,095.00 Permit Fees-Hazardous Materials&Chemicals 59525 City of Tustin 150.00 Meeting Expenses-Community Meeting Room Rental 59526 City of Westininster 1,095.00 Permit Fees-Hazardous Materials&Chemicals 59527 Coast Appliance Pans 72.35 Appliance Paris&Supplies 59528 Computational Systems,Inc. 22.150.44 Instrument-Machinery Vibration Analyzer 59529 Computer Sciences Corp. 1,080.80 Consulting&Lab Services-Assay Pilot Project 59530 Consolidated Elect.Distrbutors 2.083.65 Electrical Supplies 59531 Consolidated Reprographics 1,069.42 Printing Services 59532 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 15.10 Plumbing Supplies 59533 Control Factors-Seattle,Inc 982.80 Instrument Parts&Supplies 50M Conveyor Components Co. 598.00 Electrical Pans&Supplies 59535 Cooper Energy Services 153.19 Engine Supplies 59536 Corporate Express 9,375.79 Stationary&Office Supplies 59537 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 160.00 Custodial Services Spec.No.9899-09 59538 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 2.994.63 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 59539 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 814.00 Underground Storage Tank,Hazardous Material,&State Fees 59540 County Wholesale Electric Co. 313.78 Electrical Paris&Supplies 59541 Crew Veyor Corp. 19,617.39 Overhead Crane Repairs 59542 Culligan of Orange County 392.98 Maint.Agreement-Can Gen Water Softener System 59543 CASA 1,100.00 Technical Services&Compliance Training Registration 59544 CCP Industries 8,966.96 Janitorial Supplies 59545 CGVL Engineers 10.510.55 Engineering Services P2-82 59546 CPI International 56.32 lab Supplies 59547 GIVER 2,007.00 Source Control,Instrumentation&Elec.Maint.Meeting Registration 59548 CWFA 2002 Annual Conference 450.00 Much.Maintenance Meeting Registration-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 59549 CWEA Membership 97.00 Membership-Call..Water Environment Assoc 59550 Dapper Tire Cm 938.77 Truck Tires M,2104o EXHIBITA H:Weymnr CELWaW()W`6HAR61Cla1i Pad Ropuffl 4Clshnr Peal Repel-021504.sa Page 4 of 11Y2D(),% Claims Paid From 02/01104 to 02/16104 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 59551 David's Tree Service 675.00 Tree Maini.Service 59552 Del Mar Analytical 1,546.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 59553 Don Johnston,Inc 382.18 Software 59554 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 530.00 Paint Supplies 59555 DGA Consultants,Inc. 5,654.50 Professional Services CCTV Data Evaluation 59556 E.Sam Janes Distributors,Inc. 95.15 Electrical Supplies 59557 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 1,345.00 Medical Screening 59558 BOC Edwards 1,548A9 Lab Parts&Supplies 59559 Edwin M.Parkins 4.646.42 Professional Service -Water Quality Compliance 59560 Enchanter,Inc. 4,500.00 Ocean Monitoring&Ouffall Inspection&Maintenance 59561 Equapac 4,236.63 Hydrochloric Add 59562 ENS Resources,Inc. 15,000.00 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 59563 FedEx Corporation 630.95 Air Freight 59564 Fiber Dynamics.Inc. 573.00 Repairs&Maint.Services 59565 Fisher Scientific Company,L.L.C. 12,404.99 Lab Parts&Supplies 59566 Forensic Analytical 30.00 Asbestos Analyses&Microscopy 59567 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 24,205.08 Long-Term&Short-Term Disability Ina.Premium 59566 Franklin Covey 1.21 Office Supplies 69569 Full Spectrum Analyt cs,Inc 600.00 Lob Instrument Service 59570 FST Sand and Gravel,Inc. 414.78 Road Base Materials 59571 FTI,Inc. 237.26 Forms-W-2's&Envelopes for 2003 Reporting 59572 G.E.Supply Company 6,099.60 Elecbip9lnstri menl Repairs&Maint.Services-Analog Boards 50573 GanaB-Callahan Company 1,706.76 Chemicals 59574 Gates Fiberglass Installers 1,700.00 Fiberglass Repairs,Maint.&Installation Services 59575 George T.Hall 341.50 Electrical Supplies 59676 Dotage Castle 75028 Lab Supplies 59577 Robert P.Ghirelli 2,900.97 Meetingfrraining Expense Reimbursement 59578 Golden Bell Products 7,218.00 Contractual Services-Insecticide Coating of Manholes 59579 Grainger,Inc. 4.482.00 Electrical Parts&Supplies 59580 Grayber Electric Company 22,816.07 Upgrade of(7)Mpdicom Programmable Logic Controllers 59581 Haaker Equipment Company 1.566.57 Misc.Vehicle,Parts,Repairs&Service 59682 Harold Primrose ice 129.50 Ice For Samples 59583 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 40.78 Plumbing Supplies 59584 Henry Company-Sealants Division 170.96 Sealant Supplies 59585 Herb's Bladdound Bakery&Deli 59.00 Meeting Expenses 59588 High Purity Standards 133.99 Lab Parts&Supplies 59587 Home Depot 929,17 Misc.Repair&Maintenance Material 59588 Hopkins Technical Products 1,327.34 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 59559 Horizon Technology 771.16 Lab Parts&Supplies 59590 Hub Auto Supply 707.27 Vehicle Parts&Supplies 59591 City of Huntington Beach 3.54 Water Use 59592 HI Standard Automotive 1.197.32 Automotive Pads&Supplies 59593 I.D.Industries,Inc. 269.67 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 59594 Industrial Distribution Group 1,271AS Mechanical Parts&Supplies 59595 Inland Concrete Enterprises,Inc. 19,235.00 Construction-Manhole Repairs N 21Mc H.WapMn� CELd1a122014P6114RMIu1nw PaloRopaaD1a91Clehns Paid Repon-021501sk Page 5 of D(HIBITA 311'a2W0 Claims Paid From 02/01/04 to 02JI5104 Wa0int No. Vendor Amount Description 59596 Inorganic Ventures,Inc 637.23 Lab Parts&Supplies 59597 IBM Corporation 3,895.55 Maintenance Agreement AS400 59598 Interstate Batteries of Cal Coast 666.49 Batteries for Vehicles&Carts 59599 Invensys Systems,Inc. 4.409.35 Instrument Supplies 59600 Iron Mountain 85.06 Bid Document Storage Fees P7-37 8 J-39 59601 Irvine Pipe&Supply 756.44 Imn Piping 59602 IOMA,Inc 238.95 Subscription 59603 J.G.Tucker and Son.Inc. 5,231.16 Instrument Parts&Supplies 59604 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 4,771.87 Construction-Leak Repairs&Valve Installation 59605 Jays Catering 1,009.50 Meeting Expenses 59505 Johnstone Supply 261.78 Electrical Supplies 59507 Keith Boger 795.00 Plant 20perations Training Registration 59605 KeBech,Inc. 47.00 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 59609 Kfoml Inc. 10,202.88 Temporary Employment Services 59610 Kienow Associates,Inc. 3,771.59 Legal Services 1-2-4 59611 Kings County Farm Bureau 260.00 Membership 59612 Kleen TecJKleer Flo,Inc 588.63 Pump&Oil Skimmer 59613 Konnie K.Gallery 1,275.76 Picture Framing Services 59614 Kroy,L.L.C. 42.95 Stationery&Office Supplies 59615 League of California Cities 133.D0 Publication 596% Lucas Gourmet Foods,Inc 104.45 Meeting Expense 59617 Lyn die- m way Company,Inc. 493.65 Equipment Maintenance&Repair Services 59618 M.J.Schiff&Associates.Inc. 1,053.55 Construction-Soil Samples Drilling 59619 Maintenance Technology Corp. 60D.39 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 59620 Mandie Motors 109.50 Towing Services 59621 Mayer,Brown,Rowe&Maw,LL.P. 10,000.00 Strategic Planning Advocacy 59622 MCJunkin Corporation 2,898.75 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 59623 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 1,286.00 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 59624 MrRay Industries,Inc 4,188.24 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 59625 Mac Analytical System 1,465.00 Toxicity Analysis 59626 Medlin Controls Co. 450.71 Instrument Supplies 59627 Michael Tumipseed&Associates 5.012SD Professional Service-Tule Ranch 8 Yakima Sites Study 59628 Mid-West Associates 17,208.97 Pump Supplies 59629 Miller Equipment Co. 383.43 Repairs&Maint.Services 59630 Mission Uniform Service 1,917.05 Uniform Rentals 59631 MGD Technologies,Inc. 10,700.00 Temporary Flow Monitoring 59632 MJK Construction 5,24422 Underground Tank Cleaning 59533 N.Gtaniz&Son 586.08 ReBeetive Vimyl Film 59634 National Plant Services,Inc. 3,D60.00 Vacuum Truck Services 59635 Neal Supply Co. 149.52 Plumbing Supplies 59636 New Hermes,Inc. 230.47 Repairs&Make.Materials&Supplies 59637 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 950.00 Human Resources Training Registration 59638 Newark Electronics 746.15 Electrical Parts&Supplies 59639 Nrhdel Communications 3,392.18 Cellular Phones&Air Time 59640 Nmyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 10,965.34 Professional Services-Materials Testing,Inspection&Geolechnical Engrg. mrztM HMepMn� CFJ..4naV2p SMRMkuw;Pam RepglbSO4t lamr Paid RepM-etl5dab Pago 6 of EXHIBITA e1122aM e Claims Paid From 02101104 to 02/15104 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 59641 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 350.06 Steel Tags 59642 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,884.47 Office Supplies 59643 OhmarWEGA Corp. 495.00 Safety&Health Meeting Registration 59644 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 407.63 Electrical Parts&Supplies 59645 Orange County Fire Authority 2.190.00 Permlt Fees-Hazardous Materials&Chemicals 59W The Orange County Register 2,536.80 Notices&Ads 59647 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 118.84 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 59548 Oxygen Service Company 1,923.29 Specialty Gases 59649 OCB Reprographics 1,333.00 Printing Service-MO 1I26100 59650 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc 294.04 Electrical Supplies 59651 Pack BelWJorldCom 16.28 Telephone Service 59652 Pacific Mechanical Supply 384.59 Plumbing Supplies 59653 Parker Supply Company 478.00 Mechanical Par%&Supplies 59654 Parkhouse Tire,Inc. 1.647.18 Time 59655 Roy Perrino 51.00 MeetinglTmining Expense Reimbursement 59656 PenValve 257.27 Mechanical Paris&Supplies 59657 Perkin Elmer Corporation 393.23 Lab Paris&Supplies 59658 Femme Pure,Inc. 217.72 Filters 59659 Permaseal 800.79 Luba Oil 59660 Petroleum Engineering,Inc. 11,046.00 Corot-Install Manhole at Can Gen She and Replace&Inspect Spill Bucket 59651 Power Electra Supply Co.,Inc. 339.51 Electrical Supplies 59662 Praxair,Inc 24.68 OMca Supplies 59663 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc. 443.50 Employee Legal Servica Insurance Premium 59664 PFE International,Inc. 1,048.00 Equipment Service Agreement 59665 PR Week 178.00 Subscription 59666 PVF Sales,Inc 50.21 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 59667 R.L.Abbott&Associates 3,000.00 Kam County Biosafds Consulting Services 59668 R.T.Engineering 619.08 Meters 59689 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,550.29 Trash Removal 59670 Rellestar 9,733.35 Employee Basic Life Insurance 59671 Ricoh Business System 3,578.51 Color Copier Lease 59672 Rockwell Engineering&Equipment Co. 1,009.09 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 59673 Rein Rooter-N.O.C.91 1 370.73 Sewer Lino Cleaning 59674 Ryan Here Produce;Corp. 64.71 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 59675 RPM Electric Motors 1.410.75 Repair&Maintenance Service 59676 RS Hughes Co,Inc 137.36 Paint Supplies 59677 Sancan Engineering,Inc 10,350.00 Construction-Sewer Pipe Repairs-Tustin SN78 Schwing America,Inc 3,264.77 Pump Supplies 59679 Science Applications Intl.Corp. 13.765.59 Ocean Monitoring PA79 59680 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc 1,302.92 Tools&Concrete Mix 59681 Shimadzu Scientific Instruments,Inc. 224AO Lab Pans&Supplies 59682 Shomldge Instruments,Inc. 1,331.52 Instrument Recalibralien,Repairs&Pads 59683 Shureluch Sales&Engineering 275AS Plumbing Paris&Supplies 69684 Sierra Club 39.00 Subscription 69685 SlgmaylMrich,Inc. 259AO Lab Parts&Supplies nN21011e EXHIBfTA HWePfimE%CEL.ftV PSMR1hCJai=Feld R.mrl ea41Cleem Pa Raced,UI5e4aa Page 7 of WI 20a4 Claims Paid From 02101/04 to 02/18104 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 59686 James W.Silva 120.00 MeelinglTramirg Expense Reimbursement 59687 Skilloth On-She 3,300.00 OnSne Training-MS Word%P 59688 Smaroan Supply Company 22.84 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 59689 Smith Pipe&Supply,Inc. 367.02 Plumbing Supplies . 59690 Smith-Emery Company 15,356.00 SOIts,Concrete&Other Materials Testing 59691 Society of Env.Toxicology&Chemistry 295.00 Membership 59692 Solar Biologicals,Inc. 2,234.03 Lab Paris&Supplies 59693 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 93.75 Annual Emission,Operation&Misc.Fees 59694 South Coast Systems,Inc. 1.530.00 Repairs&Malnt.Services-AGF Pilot Plant Electrical System 59695 Southern California Edison 7.683.67 Power 59696 Stanley Steamer International,Inc. 294AD Carpet Cleaning Services 59697 Summit Steel 3,276.19 Metal 59698 Sunset Ford 31.43 AM Parts&Service 59699 Sunset Industrial Pans 761.49 Motor&Mechanical Parts&Supplies 69700 Super Power Products 1,163.70 Janitorial Supplies 59701 Symcm-TSG 1,381.60 SCADA System VAX Service Agreement 59702 SAWPA 15,000.OD District Share of Tri-County 2003-04 Watershed Agreement&Conservation Program 59703 South Coast Environmental Co. 522.50 Can Gen Emissions Testing Service 59704 SKC-We3L Inc 129.30 Lob Parts&Supplies 59706 SPEC Services,Inc. 8.325.00 Engineering Services PI-89&Pit.1 VFD Replacement at Waste Side Stream Pump 69706 SPX Valves&Control 8.918.26 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60707 Terminhr International 980.00 Pest Control 50708 Tetra Tech,Inc. 12,595.22 Professional Services 11-22 59709 Textile Engineering Associates 603.62 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 59710 The Lewis Group 1,846.49 Consulting Service-Capital Project Management Process 59711 Thomas V.Geriinger 1,050.00 Lab Analyses 59712 Thompson Industrial Supply.Inc. 763.18 Mechanical Supplies 59713 ThyssanKrupp Elevator 556.00 Elevator Maintenance 59714 Time Warner Communication 45.22 Cable Services 59715 Timm Community News 218.75 Notices&Ads 59718 Tony's Look&Safe Service&Sales 9.43 Locka&Keys 59717 Training 78.00 Subscription 59718 So.California Trans Service 3.314.00 Electrical Equipment Service Contract 59719 Truck&Auto Supply,Inc. 453.48 Truck&Auto Parts 59720 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 50.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 59721 Tustin Unified School Dislrid 544.00 Meeting Expenses-Community Meeting Room Rental 59722 Ultra Scientific 530.86 Lab Supplies 59723 The Unisource Corporation 857.41 Stationery&Office Supplies 59724 United States Treasury 5.075.12 Professional Services J-85-Naval Past Graduate School 59725 Urban Alteratives 19,369.00 Professional Services 1-10 59726 UC Regents 575.00 Safety&Health Training Registration 59727 The Vantage Group,L.L.C. 11,756.00 Temporary Employment Service 69728 Varian,Inc. 66.10 Lab Parts It Supplies 59729 Verlxon Caltome, 549.14 Telephone Services 59730 Verne's Plumbing 75.00 Service Contract-Testing&Cad.Backflow Devices at Ph.1&2&Pump Ste. flat Mc EXHIBIT A H WepMnrE%CEL.dIa1220W 5H4RE1DNMS Paid Rapara0M4Tlams Paid Repot-021504ab Page 8 of WIMM Clalma Peal From 02/01/04 to 02116/04 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 69731 VOlon Service Plan{CA) 9.257.40 Vision Service Premium 59732 VWR Scientific Products 7,016.30 Lab Supplies 59733 The Wackenhut Corporation 22,187.12 Security Guards 59734 Waters Corporation 553.09 Lab Pads&Supplies 59735 Wale Sanitary Supply $72.05 Janitorial Supplies 59736 Westport Aparatus DBA Breaker Supply 115.72 Electrical Supplies 59737 WEF-Registration Dept. 1,535.00 Instrumentation&Electrical Maint.and Air Quality Meeting Registration 59738 WEF 696.00 Membership-Water Environment Federatlon 59739 WOI 450.00 Pit.2 Operations Training Registration 69740 Xerox Corp-OMNI 21.00 Fax Machine Maintenance 59741 Xerox Corporation 7,146.99 Fax&Copier Leases&Supplies 50742 Xpedex Paper&Graphics $6.29 Specialty Paper 59743 Adams/Ma(lory Construction Co.,Inc. 12,606.72 Construction P2-79-1 59744 California Bank&Trust 3,302.00 Construction J-331A,Retention 59745 Paulus Engineering,Inc. 18.697.00 Construction 6-22-R7 59746 Jeffrey L.Armstrong 202.75 Meeting/Tralntrig Expense Reimbursement 59747 Peter Cheffr 46.00 Meelingrrmining Expanse Reimbursement 50748 Donald R.Cleveland 41.00 Meelingr7relning Expense Reimbursement 59749 Deirdre E.Hunter 273.19 Meeting/freining Expense Reimbursement 59750 VledimirA.Kagan 300.35 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 59751 Ludolph T.Lurdmar 535.96 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 59752 James W.Mate 41910 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 59753 Joseph W.Perk,Jr. 56.00 MeatingrPrainirg Expense Reimbursement 59754 George L.Robertson 202.75 Meelingf rraining Expense Reimbursement 69755 David M.Yager 46.00 Meeting/7relning Expense Reimbursement 59756 Orange County Flood Control District 2.500.00 Permit Fees-J-77 59757 Orange County Sanitation District 2,262.77 Petty Cash Reimb. Total Accounts Payable-Warrants S 8,239,535.20 Payroll Disbursements 33057-33148 Employee Paychecks $ 147.102.03 Biweekly Payroll 02XM104 33149-33150 Employee Paychecks 1,44439 Temdnetion Payouts 94074-94582 Direct Deposit Statements 955,204.85 Biweekly Payroll 02/04/04 Total Payroll Disbursements It 1,104,751.27 Wire Transfer Payments Lloyds TSS Bank pic $ 72.485.42 Letter of Credit Fee for Standby CeriBcste Pureness Agreement If 1/0110 3-0 2/01/04) Chase Manhattan Bank 73,766.34 Lefler of Credit Fee for 2000 Refunding COP&(11101103-01131104) JP Mogan Chase Bank 31,371.14 January Interest Payment on 1993 Cedificates of PaNcipefion JP Mogan Chase Bank 129,904.97 Societe Generale January Swap Payment on 1993 Cenillcates of Participation Societe Generale,New York Branch $ 54,518.63 Letter of Credit Fee for 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation Total Wlre Transfer Payments $ 352,124.50 Total Claims Paid 02101/04-02/15104 $ 9,706,410.97 nv21mP EXHIBITA RWoPnf1FXCEL raQ2MPSHRBCl.ima Pao RapxrW ACalma Peal Italian-011501xis Page 9 of 3112/2004 Claims Paid From 02/16104 W 02J29104 Warrant No. Vander Amount Description Accounts Payable-Warrents 59758 Orange County Samuelson Disthil 6 677.367.36 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 59769 Persons,Ina 381,977.84 Enginsedng Services J-35-1 59760 Ahgas Safety,Inc. 2.175.41 Safety Supplies 59761 American Aidines 3,122.80 Travel Services 597W Canons Engineers 1,M2.50 Professional Services-Gas Leek at Pit.1,Digester 59763 Court Order 160.00 Wage Garnishment 597" Consumers Pipe 8 Supply Co. 10.06 Plumbing Supplies 59755 County of Omnge 182.14 Wage Garnishment 59766 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 59767 CMAA 86.00 Safety 8 Health Meeting Registration 59768 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 9.649.35 Reimbursed Prepeld Employee Medical B Dependent Care 59769 Court Order 445.00 Wage Garnishment 59770 FedEx Corporation 81.99 Air Freight 59771 Franchise Tax Board 100.00 Wage Garnishment 59772 Fry's Electronics 285.52 Computer Supplies 59773 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 67.91 Mechanical Pens 5 Supplies 59774 Internal Revenue Service, 500.00 Wage Garnishment 59775 Ind.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3.849.76 Dues Deduction 59776 Kleen Tec/Kiser Flo,Inc. 70.96 Instrument Pads 8 Supplles 59777 Mayer,Brown,Rowe 8 Maw,LL.P. 5,000.30 Professional Services-Strategic Planning 8 Advocacy 59778 Mc ulasim-Cart Supply Co. 1,804.83 Mechanical Pads,Supplies 8 Tools 59779 Midway Mfg.B Machining Co. 5.619.00 Repairs 8 Maintenance Service 59780 National Bond 8 Trust 2.162.76 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 59781 OCEA 589.36 Dues Deducilon 597V Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 59783 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 597M Peace Officers Council of CA 1,557.00 Dues Deduction 59795 PenValve 37.D6 Mechanical Paris B Supplies 59786 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 59787 United Parcel Service 250.53 Parcel Services 59788 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions 59769 Verizon California 28.24 Telephone Smlcas 59790 VOEF-Regional Dept. 475.00 Air Quality 8 Spatial Projects Meeting Registration 69791 Court Order 507.50 Wage Garnishment 59792 Alexander Aldace 1.318.23 User Fee Refund Regarding Septic Tanks 59793 Local Agency Formation Commission 1.150.00 Annexation Fee 59794 Slate of California 200.00 Slate Beach Permit Fee 59795 Air Products 6 Chemicals,Inc. 26,294.06 0 S M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 84-69 59796 Black 8 Veatch Corporation 37.562.38 Engineering Services Pt-75 59797 Boyle Engineering Corporation 25,711.18 Professional Services 1.24 59796 Brown S Celtlwell 40,255.47 Professional Services PV37 59799 California Soil Products 62,855.66 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 595DD Camp Dresser 8 McKee,Inc. 144,714.06 Engineering SeMces J-71-8 59801 Environmental Engineering&Contracting 33,928.00 Professional Services-FOG Control Study 59802 Flo-Systems,Inc, 84,438.29 WEMCO lmmemlble Pump 59803 G E Modular Space 32,188.00 Modular Specs Troller 59804 Hamplon Tedder Technical Services 56,167.43 Repairs to 12V Feeder et Pit.2 59805 Irvine Technology Corporation 28.W7.00 Temporary Employment S.M. N bePwiMf%CEL.MN312NgP51W1DClaimz Pew aepmY13011Cblmr Paid swoon-OIIaOC.ea EXHIBIT B M M1I Wk Page 1 of 7 Linton, Claims Paid From OW16104 to 02I29104 Warrant No. Vander Amount Description 59806 I(emiron Pacific.Inc. 118,894.92 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 59807 Lee&Ro,Inc. 26,919.82 Professional Services b22-1,5.51&S 2 59808 M.J.Schiff&Associates,Inc. 51.553.09 Construction-Interplant Gas Una Repair 59809 Malcolm Finds.Inc. 145,274.75 Proemial onal Sen4ces 1-10 59810 McMahan Business Interiors 33A22.19 Censmuction-Modification to Safety Division Treiler at PH.1 59811 Motorola,Inc. 91.207.16 Radice If Accessories 59812 Municipal Water Dist.of Orange County 27,298.69 Wafer Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 59813 Parsons Water&Inkersbuclu e,Inc. 181,812.59 Professional Services J-35.2 59814 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 156,515.68 Sodium Hyporhlodho 59816 Polydyrre,Inc. 92.697.42 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11.92 59816 Quinn Shepherd Machinery 79.926.88 (1)Caterpillar Backhoe Loader 59817 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 43.062.68 Annual Emission,Operation&Misc.Fees 59818 Southern California Edison 92,682.35 Power 59819 Sysihne Computer Corp 63.354.00 Professional Services-J D Edwartls One World%E Support 59820 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 27,6511M Pump&Mechanical Supplies 59821 Tuh RanWMagan Farms 167,702.26 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 59822 U.S.Peroxide,L.L.C. 126.909.11 Famous CModde&Hydrogen Peroxide for Miller Holder&Air Base Coll.Systems 59823 UBS Financial Services,Inc. 30,149.69 Remarketing Fee-1992 Series Advanced RelurMirg COPs 59824 Woodruff,Spredlin&Smart 114.591.98 Legal Services MO 7.26-95 59US WS Atkins Water 34,607.12 Professional Services J-408 59826 AIRS,Inc. 240.718.76 Construction 11-22 59827 Margate Construction.Inc. 1,505,180.00 Construction P1-37 59828 Mike Priici1&Some 378,844.20 Cormsirogion 6-13-1&7.23-1 69829 Paulus Engineering,Inc. 77,850.00 Construction 5-22-111 59830 Steve P Ratios,Inc. 204,275.70 Construction 1.24 59831 A&S Company 808.13 Metal Detectors&Cases 59832 Absolute Standards,Inc. 405.DO Lab Pads&Supplies 59533 AccuSlandard 3,108.83 Lab Pads&Supplies 59BU Air Uquide America Corporation 1,081.85 Spmedy Gases 59835 Ahgas-West 1.517.31 Lab Pads&Supplies 598M Airgas Safety,Inc. 297.19 Safety Supplies 59837 American Red Cross 2,024.0D CPR Training If Miscellaneous Supplies 59838 American Water Works Assec.,Wyer Dually 835.00 Source Control Training Registration 59839 Aquarium Doctor 105.44 Human Resources Aquarium Service 59MO Aquatic Bleassay And Consulting Labs,Inc. 1.820.e0 Toxicity Testing 59841 Arch Wireless 1,542A8 A101me,Service&Equipment 59842 ASAP Software Express 3.4114.56 SpBwBre License-Microsoft Enterprise 59843 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 202A4 Telephone Service 598t4 Basic Chemical Solutions,L.L.C. 18,373.10 Sodium Sisulfile 59845 Battery Specialties 516.43 Batteries 59846 Bentley Systems,Inc. 4,301.55 Software Subscription 59847 Boot Barn 213.10 Reimbursable Safety Shoes 59848 CelGless,Inc. 7220 Glass Repair 59849 Califomis Auto Collision 774.6D Vehicle Repairs-V430 59850 California Municipal Treasurers Assoc. 240.e0 Membership 59851 California Relocation Services,Inc. 225.00 File MovinglRelodibn Services 59852 Callan Associates,Inc. 3,550.00 Irrvestment Advisor 59853 Cambridge Isotope Labs 3,10320 Lab Paris&Suppllas 59854 Cameron Welding Supply 196.70 Welding Supplies X WepM 1EXCELlIe1R1m4PSHAnFCN'vne Pdkllk ca'Aiga Whz PW keprrr-N .tlr EXHIBIT emvzrlm Page 2 of 7 ylac� Claims Palo From 02116104 to OV29104 Warrant No. Vender Amount Description 59855 Con lock Fuel Systems,Inc. 9,756.66 Fueling District Vehicles at Local Gas Stations 59856 Center for Creative Growth 2,300.00 Professional Services-0 If M Management Coaching 59857 Ctngular Wireless Alnlme 3,919.10 Cellular Ah Time 59856 City of Tustin 118.74 Water 59869 Cole-Partner Instrument Company 122.33 Lab Pena&Supplies 59860 Condenser&Chiller Servces,Inc. 2,187.43 Condenser Paris&Reports 59861 Consolidated Elect.Distributors.Inc. 3423.53 Electdcal Pans It Supplies 59862 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 1,434.54 Plumbing Supplies 59863 Cooper Cameron Corporation 175.51 Engine Supplies 59864 Corporate Express 2,511.41 Office Supplies 59865 Cost Containment Solutions 2,63li Wodcae.Comp.Sandws 59866 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 130.90 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 59867 County of Orange 773.22 Maint.Agreement-RepairlInstallation of Base.Handheld&Vehicle Radios 59868 County Wholesale Electric Co. 346.60 Electrical Pads&Supplies 59868 Cummins Cal Pectic,Inc. 600.10 Electrical Paris&Supplies 59870 Cytec Industries,Inc. 18.478.77 Anionic Polymer Spec.No.9798.18 59871 CEPA Company 126.00 Lab Equipment Testing If Certification 59872 CR&R,Ina 2,635.00 Container Rentals 59873 CWEA 2002 Annual Conference 2,095.00 0&M Training Registration-California Water Environment Association 59874 CWEA Membership 104.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 69875 CWEA Specialty Conference 250.00 Source Control Training Registration 59876 Dapper Tire Co. 587.95 Truck Tires 59877 Da%Ws Tree SerAm 1,000.00 Tree Melnt.Service 59878 Del Mar Ans"ral 1,658.00 Analysis of Blosolids and Wastewater 59879 Dillingham Software Engineering,Inc. 499.00 Information Technology Training Registration 59880 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 200.96 Paint SUPPIies 59881 Dynamic Details,Inc. 1,854.21 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59882 OGA Consultants,Inc. 2,392.00 Professional Services-CCTV Data Evaluation 59883 DMARK Corporation 1,057.21 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 59884 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 505.89 Electrical Supplies 59885 Eastman Corporation 4,105.50 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59886 Faslech Badger 2,040.60 Instrument Pads&Supplies 59887 Electrolurgy 822.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59888 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 844.00 Reimbursed Pmpeld Employee Medical&Dependent Care 59889 Employers Group 250.00 Human Resource Training Registration 59890 Enchanter,Inc 4,500.00 Ocean Monitoring&Outfall Inspeclion&Maintenance 59891 Entech Instruments,Inc. 3.369.15 Lab Paris&Supplies 59892 Enthone,Inc. 698.37 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 59893 Environmental Resource Associates 2,711.70 Lab SUPPI185 59894 Equapac 2,030.13 Hydrochloric Add 59895 FedEx Corporation 232.11 Air Freight 59896 Ferguson Enterprises,Inc. 151.59 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 59887 First American Reel Estate Solutions 647.50 Orange County Property Information 59898 Fisher Sdenift 13,431.03 Lab Paris&Supplies 59899 Fleet Research,Inc. 336.00 Publication 5990D Fluor Enlorprices,Inc. 24.305.79 Engineering Services J-84 59901 Foodereff Coffee&Refreshment Services 713.35 Meeting Supplies 59902 FedM Benefits Insurance Company 19,780.69 Long-Term&Shod-Term Disability Ina.Premium 59903 Fountain Valley Paints,Inc. 231.55 Paint Supplies NwaPffi EXCELdW72W4PSMRSCWIrn.Pad RepopbSOCICbIme Pod R,W-0,,N.ab EXHIBIT 6,121. Page 3 of anaacoa Claims Paid From 02J16104 to 02/29104 Woman N. Vendor Amount Description 59004 Franklin Covey 14.38 Office Supplies 59905 Fys Electronics 430.42 Computer Supplies 59906 Garg-0II Production,L.L.C. 460.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program SM07 GenaB-Callahan Company 4,984.62 Chemicals 69008 Grainger,Inc. 2,927.09 Electrical Pert.Is Supplies 59909 Guarantee Records Management 255.34 O6Site Records Storage 59910 Het,do Penton Industries 115.62 Lab Paris&Supplies 59911 Hach Company 3.941.57 Instrument Pans&Supplies 59912 Herrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 2.695.16 Plumbing Supplies 69913 Harrison French Architecture 6.427.32 Recondlia i n User Fee Refund Program 59914 Herman Miller Workplace Resource 264.75 Ofica Futures 59915 Hewlett-Packard Company 17.196.40 Computers-(6)Printers,&Accessoriae 59916 Hill Brothers 19531.09 Chemicals-Door&Corrosion Control-Newport Trunkgna 59917 The Holman Group 915.30 Employee Assistance Program Premium 59918 Home Depot 336.43 Mlec.Repair&Maintenance Material 59919 Hub Auto Supply 155.00 Vehicle Pans&Supplies 59920 Id. 7,370.10 Lab Pena&Supplies 59921 Industrial Distribution Group 435.72 Electrical Parts,Paint Supplies&Tools 59922 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 5.931.51 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 59923 Information Resources 600.00 Human Resources Service-Background Checks 59924 Inland Concrete Enterprise.,Inc. 4,872.00 Construction-Manhole Raising 59925 Insight Investments 128.18 Freight 59926 interstate Satledes of Cal Coast 652.26 Bananas for Vehicles&Cans 59927 Inaatek Computer,Inc. 720.00 Network Support 59928 Irnensys Systems,Inc. 1,817.04 Electrical Supplies 59929 Imn Mountain OBSno Date Pmtechon 310.00 OOshe Bark-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 59930 Irvine Ranch Water District 34.85 Water Use 59931 ISEC,Inc. 3.353.00 Instrument Pan.&Supplies 59932 J&L Industrial Supply 420.20 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 59933 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 7,466.00 Repairs&Maintenance Service-Install Piping 8(2)Carbon Canisters on Digester T 59934 Jayt Catering 611.77 Meeting Expenses 59935 Johnstone Supply 169.60 Electdml Supplies 69936 JWC Environmental 1,571.96 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 59937 K.P.Lindstrom,Inc. 5.192.50 Endronm.ntal Consulting Services MO 12.9-90 599H Keith Boger 1,095.00 Plant l Operations Training Registration 69939 Kelly Paper 214.64 Paper 59940 Kforce,Inc. 22.905.51 Temporary Employment Services 59941 League Of Calilome Cities 2,347.50 General Management Admin.Meeting Registration 59942 Leal.Nails Matthew Bender 288.58 Books&Publlcelions 59943 London Education Services 618.00 Planning Training Registration 699U Magnolia School D'lsmd 15.90 R.on.Aetion User Fee Refund Program 59945 Mainline Information Systems 20,258.00 Software Subscription&Support-AS1400 59946 Management Technologies 5.400.00 Professional Servos-Project Management Process 59947 Mandic Motors 88.50 Towing Sen4sea 59948 MosaMufual Michel Financial Group 1.339.11 Executive Disability Plan Premium 59949 MOCrmdr.Inc. 457.96 Instrument Repairs 59950 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 6,008.77 Mechanical Pans,Supplies&Repair Materials 59951 MOPeeks Dodge of Anaholm 11.227.55 (1)2004 GEM,4-Passenger NEV 59952 Media Resudaclag Systems.Inc 2,500.00 Repairs&Maintenance Services HWeAA^ CELala1 !`SlnARINClehns Palk!nepmMd Glehns Pew napari-ocni"ns EXHIBIT 11@1N Page of ytangpr . „ Claims Paid From e2116104 to OV29104 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descrlpdon 59953 Medlin Controls Co. 460.72 Instrument Supplies 599M Meg9er 279.08 Software 59955 Mid-bleat AssoGates 13.963.12 Pump Supplies 59956 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 21,016.81 Refurbishment of(2)Swing Pump Piston Rods It Rotation of Auger Assembly 59957 Mission Abrasive B Janitorial Supplies 127.36 Janitorial Supplies 59958 Mission Uniform Service 2,009.16 Unlform Rentals 59950 Business Training&Development Services 267.46 Training Supplies 59950 Neal Supply Co. 326.48 Plumbing Supplies 59981 NotVersent of Southern California 1,776.66 Magic Card Badging System Ribbon 59962 New Horizons CLC of Sent.Ana 480.00 Mechanical Maintenance&Power Pmduction Training Registration 59963 City of Newport Beach 63.06 Water Use 59964 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 755.35 Professional Services-Materials Testing,Inspection&Geolechnical Engri, 59965 MS Associates,Inc 1,555.00 Lab Services 59966 O C Tanner Recognition Company 99.05 Employee Service Awards Program 59967 Office Depot Business Services Div. 4,539.21 Office Supplies 59968 Oneliource Distributors,Inc. 77.07 Electrical Pads&Supplies 59969 Orange FIUM System Technologies,Inc. 705.58 Plumbing&Lab Pads&Supplies 59970 ONx Fire Protection 327.00 Fire Sprinkler System Repalre-Adman Bldg. 59971 Oxygen Service Company 1,749.72 Specialty Gases 59072 OCB Reprographics 23,871.70 Printing Service-MO 1I26100 59973 Padhc Ball Internet Services 333.72 Internet Service 59974 Pacific Mechanical Supply 35.79 Plumbing Supplies 59975 Pastille Process Equipment,Inc 6,465.00 Vahea 59976 Parker Hannifin Corporation 113.77 Instrument Parts&Supplies 59977 Puelpushem.Inc. 19,100.00 Prof.So..-Design,Implement,Construct&Install a Corporate Intranet She 59975 Power ElechO Supply Co.,Inc. 31.76 Electrical Supplies 59979 PrinterGuy 4,904.24 Printer Mainleneilm 59980 PsuUm s 13,770.00 Professional Services SP-15-Geographic Information System 59981 Pump Engineering 1,551.60 Pump Supplies 59982 PCS Express,Inc. 110.00 Courier Service 59983 PSI 70.00 Repair Services-Rebuild Shop Steam Cleaner 59984 Radius Maps 1,915.00 Radius Map&Ownership Listings 59985 Resin Instrument,L.L.C. 285.66 Lab Instrument Repair&Calibration Services 59986 Remedyremp,Inc. 8,607.41 Temporary Employment Services 59987 Ryan Herm Products Corp. 2,046.32 Plumbing Parts&Supplies 59988 RAE Systems,Inc. 561.50 InsWment Repair B Calibration Services-Gam Detector 59989 RBF Engines. 940.50 Engineering Services 2.24-1 59990 IRS Hughes Co,Inc 41.78 Paint Supplies 59991 Safety-Ween 539.26 Pads Washer Leese&Service 59992 Safdywre,Inc. 253.21 Safety Vldm 59993 Seaventunes 3.500.00 Oman Monhoring Vessel 59994 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 107.10 Tools 59995 Shimaku SGentific Instruments,Inc. 77.89 Lab Supplies 59996 Shurelucil Sales&Engineering 556.64 Mechanical Pads&Supplies 59997 Siemens Building TethnoloBles 1.209.50 Automation System Repairs,Maintenance&Suppod Services 59995 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. 136.41 Lab Supplies 59999 Skater,Inc. 215.78 Lab Supplies 60000 SkillPath On-She 3.300.00 On-Site Training-MS awl.Level 3 60001 Smardan Supply Company 280.77 Valve H VIspMME%CEL EIe112lMPSNPRE\CWmr Pact Rapo4waMMXMr Peb Reryl-ccus",n EXHIBIT B s,.rslax Page 5 of 7 YlaQmf Claims Paid From 02/16/04 to 02/29/04 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description U002 Smith-Emery Company 1,131.25 Soils,Concrete 8 Other Materials Testing 60003 Snap On Industrial 181.70 Took 60004 Southern California Edison 26.02 Power 60005 Southern Counties Lubricants 2.009.00 Engine Oil 60006 Sparkle9s 1.475.68 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 60007 Spectrum Video.Inc. 1,662.50 Professional Services-Board Room Audio-Visual Oesgn 60008 Spex Ceilipmp,Ine. $4.15 Lab Supplies 60009 Suneel Industrial Paris 2.085.02 Mechanical Supplies W010 Super Chem Corporation 358.33 Chemicals 60011 SARBSCWEA 40.00 0 8 M Training Registration 60012 SBC 967.42 Telephone Services 60013 South Cowl Environmental Co. 14,192.17 Can Gen Emkebns Testing Service 60014 SEW 400.40 PuNiation 80015 SPEC Services,Inc. 19,94927 Engineering Services J-33-1 60016 TayW-Dunn 1,601.84 Electric Cart Park 60017 Teem Sapallite Co. 2.070.00 Commuction-Reloafion of Liquid Gas Containers at Lab Building 60018 Tekdmufxs,Inc 239.21 MerJmniral Supplies 60019 Wall Inc. 24520 Monthly Air-Time Service Fee 8 SoBwareMardware Mr int For Vehicle Tracking Sys. 60020 The Walking Man,Inc. 1,050A0 Construction Notice Distribution-Suchard Trunk Sewer Replacement 60021 Time Community News 175.00 Notices 8 Ads Soon Todd Painting,Inc. 2,465.00 Painting Services 60023 Tonys Lock 8 Sale Service 8 Sales 427.10 Locks 8 Keys 60024 Teahlba lntemational Corporation 61.78 Freight 60025 Tpw.W Public Affairs 5.000.00 Legislative 8 Executive Advocate for Grant Funding 60026 Tropical Plaza Nursery,Inc. 9,T71.91 Contact Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 6=7 Truck S Auto Supply,Inc. 459.05 Automotive Supplies 60028 Tran it Laboratories,Inc. 1,100.00 Analysis of Slospllds and Waslewaler 60029 Tuthill Energy SystamsNentilaticn 4.141.32 Ventilation System Parts 8 Supplies 60030 Type Gallery Printers 1,733.16 Printing-�FOG'Posters 60031 US Filter/Polymetria,Inc. 4,516.00 Service Agreement-Lab Punfiafion System 60032 Ulba Scientific 1,54920 Lab Supplies 60033 United Parcel Service 1,499.03 Pa.]Services 60OU US Equipment Co.,Inc. 71.40 Mechanical Parts S Supplies 6=5 Valley Splicing Co. 1,200.00 Equipmenl Repair 60036 Valverde Constructed.Inc. 19,505.24 Construction-8'Sewerlirs,Replacement-Tustin 60037 The Vantage Group.L.L.C. 12,440.00 Temporary Employment Service 60039 Varian,Inc. 4,177.97 Lab Pads a Supplies 60039 Venzon 122.36 Telephone Service 60040 Vedzan California 5,877.91 Telephone Services 60041 Voiced,USA,L.L.C. 403.19 Safely Video 60042 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 7,553.17 Lab Pans B Supplies 60"3 W.Bom 8 Associates,Inc. 9,451.58 Safely Supplies Wiwi The Wackenhut Canpomtion 7242AS Security Guards B0045 Weefe Merkek 14,747.43 Maint.Agreement-Grit B Screenings Removal 3 Digester Bed Mail.Removal 60M Wexk Sanitary Supply 207.02 Janitorial Supplies 80O47 W11son Supply,Inc. 2.463.05 Mechanical Park 8 Supplies 60M WEF Publications 75.75 Publication 60049 %emx Corporation 918A3 Fw Copler Supplies 60050 Yologawa Corp.ofAmeda 386A6 Instrument Supplies H Vey AxCELeac]ONnSruRMl :m PM Peq Pli an-o]Xwia EXHIBIT B fwnwm Page 6 of ytgpppl -, Claims Paid From OU16104 to 021291M Warrant No. Vendor Amount Descdistion 60051 Union Bank of California 22,697.30 Caru.9uction 1-2.4,Retention 60052 Thomas M.SlanOa 950.88 MeetinBfTraining Expense Reimbursement 60053 Patrick B.Cemehan 249J Meeling/Rreinirg Expense Reimbursement 60054 Chris A.Covello d, 300.00 MeelinglTra nbg Expense Reimbursement 60055 Robert Gaggle 719.53 MeelingfTramirg Expense Reimbursement 60056 Tod E.Haynes 150.00 Meeting/yreining Expense Reimbursement 60057 -any,E.-czorek 41.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement W058 Ka0rteea T.Mlllea 405.00 Meetingrimining Expense Reimbursement 60059 Robert Ootan 425.50 MeetingRrelning Expense Reimbursement 60060 Roy J.Reynolds 148.00 Mee0ngrTra nbrg Expense Reimbursement 60061 Robed J.Taylor 557.16 Meedrg?reining Expense Reimbursement 60062 Sonja A.Wassgren 266.40 MeatingRreining Expense Reimbursement 60063 Charles F.Vdnsor 453.12 Meetingrtraining Expense Reimbursement 60064 Paula A.Zeller 722.37 Meeting/Tratning Expense Reimbursement 60065 City of Buena Perk 10950 Permit Fees 60066 City of Fountain Valley 869.70 Plan Check Fees-Jd4 60067 County of Orange-Auditor Controller 810.DD Administrative Processing Fee for Supplemental Sewer Fee AdjustmentslCancallations 60068 County of Orarge-Auditor Controller 1.W.DD Administrative Processing Fee for Supplemental Sewer Fee AdjuslmentslCanrzllatlons 60069 Dell B Emllb Alston 3,000.00 Employee Computer Loan Program Total Accounta Payable-Warrants $ 6,712,057.00 Payroll Utebuneendenta 33151-33266 Employee PaycheG $ 166,277.30 Biweekly Payroll 02MIND4 33267-33267 Employee Paycheck 172.98 Reissued Check 84553.95097 Direct Deposit Statements 993,382.81 Biweekty Payroll 0VISM Total Payroll Disbursements It 1.159.833.09 Wiro Transfer Paymonb U.S.Bank S 102,331.98 February Interest Payment on 2000 Seder A 8 8 Certificates of Participation Total Wine Transfer Payments $ 102,331.98 Total Claims Paid 0VII SM4-D2/2SM4 S 7.974.222.07 H wopUnaEXCEnul I`SnAROCums Pad Rep M034dkCU,ms Papa R.Pon.oaso4..a EXHIBIT B eyncre Page 7 of 7 3n WA04 I BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To ad.of Dir. 04/28/04 AGENDA REPORT tem Numher Item Numbe a Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote. CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than $250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving the Orange County Sanitation District. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with the District. In general;you must disclose the basis of the conflict by identifying the name of the firm or individual who was the contributor. For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308, please see your Director's Handbook or call the office of General Counsel. SUMMARY See attached listing. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 03/01/04—03/15/04 and 03/16/04—03/31/04 H:\depnfln1270\CRANE\FAHR\FAHR20D4WPRIL\BoiDD428M4 gandaReport_ClaimsPaid042604.00c Revised: 06/04/03 ire Claims Paid From 03/01/04 to 03MS104 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Pavable-Warrants 60070 Jamison Engineering Contractors.Inc. $ 35,822.90 Repairs&Maintenance of Potable Water Mein Feed Line at Plant 1 60071 Orange County Sanitation District 677,671.78 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 60072 Southern California Edison 52,677.22 Power 60073 Dynamic Fabrication,Inc. 54.705.02 Auger Frame&Hopper Assemblies 60074 Angles Safety 4004.82 Safety Supplies 60075 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 26.45 Telephone Service 60076 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 60077 Consolidated Elect.Distributors 149.46 Electrical Supplies 60078 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 13.30 Plumbing Supplies 60079 Container-Cam International, Inc. 4,446.75 Containers 60080 County of Orange 42.00 Legislative Advocacy Meeting Expenses 60081 Countyof Orange 182.14 Wage Garnishment 60082 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 60083 Employee Benefits Specialists,Inc. 9.493.97 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 600B4 Court Order 445.00 Wage Garnishment 60085 Franchise Tax Board 100.00 Wage Garnishment 60086 Fys Electronics 654.78 Computer Supplies 60087 Gene Holld 3,030.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 60088 Idexx 1.422.30 Lab Supplies 60089 Internal Revenue Service 200.00 Wage Garnishment 6009D Intemsl Revenue Service 300.00 Wage Garnishment 60091 Ind.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3,871.60 Dues Deduction 6OD92 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 959.98 Mechanical&Electrical Paris&Supplies 60093 National Bond&Trust 2,162.75 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 60D94 City of Newport Beach 10.03 Water Use 60095 The Orange County Register 8,764.04 Notices&Ads 60096 OCEA 589.36 Dues Deduction 60097 ONRIMTS Buoy Workshop 365.00 Source Control Meeting Registration 60098 Court Order 40.00 Wage Gamishment 60099 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 60100 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,557.00 Dues Deduction 60101 Piclometry International Corp. 15,OD0.00 Image Library Software License training 60102 PSI 75.00 Repair&Maintenance Service on Lando Steam Cleaner 60103 RMS Systems,Inc. 824.00 Software License Renewal&Support 60104 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 864.27 Pump Supplies 60105 Smardan Supply Company 369.94 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60106 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 60101 SDRCholce 1,054.77 Software 60108 SBC 55.35 Telephone Services 60109 Therms Environmental Instruments 1,221.D9 Instrument Parts&Supplies 60110 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 436.20 Mechanical Supplies 60111 U.S Postal SBrvice(AMS-TMS) 6,000.00 Postage 60112 The Unisource Corporation 201.93 Office Supplies 60113 United Way 255.00 Employee Contributions 60114 Vedzon California 6D6.89 Telephone Services 00115 Court Order 597.50 Wage Garnishment baritone E%HISITA H:WyaIMExCEL4Nt WPSHgREl JmS Paid RepoMA3{ %Calms Paid neWn'031501 Page t of 3a020041 Claims Paid From 03/01/04 to 03/15/04 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 50116 County of Orange 43.00 Annexation Fee 60117 Heeng,Tyler 2,398.96 Employee Computer Loan Program 60118 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee 60119 Thomplaw.Mary Sue 1,295.73 Employee Computer Loan Program 60120 Vernon Cummings 135.28 Claim Settlement 60121 United States Treasury 4,400.92 Tax Deposits 00122 Applied Ocean Sciences 33,6D0.00 Professional Services J-85 60123 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 85.079.29 Professional Services-J-73.2 60124 Bask Chemical Solutions,L.L.C. 28.415.90 Sodium Bisul9te&Sodium Hydroxide 60125 Blue Cross of California 330,472.47 Medical Insurance Premium 60126 Brown&Caldwell 114.480.63 Professional Services 1-98&CM10WWDR 60127 California Soil Products 33,260.78 Residuals Removal MO 3.29A5 W128 Carollo Engineers 697,173.41 Professional Services P2-66 60129 Coral Energy Resources,L.P. 136,058.02 Natural Gas 60130 Dell Computers 34,802.80 (1)Server,(3)Ham Drives,(11)Monitors&Misc.Hardware&Support 60131 Delta Dental 57.027.64 Denial Insurance Plan 60132 E.I.Du Pont De Nemours and Company 36,740.00 Palming Maim.Services MO 4-22-98 60133 IPMC rJo Parsons 792,319.00 Professional Services-Integrated Program Management 60134 Keiser Foundation Health Plan 51,496.41 Medical Insurance Premium 60135 Kemdon Pacific,Inc. 143,37926 Ferric Chloride MO 9.27-95 60136 Kanex H2O Science,Inc. 90.471.60 Professional Services PI-98 60137 Lee&Ro,Inc. 50,831 A7 Professional Services 549.5-50.5-51 &5.52 60138 Malcolm Pimlo,Inc. 47,361.85 Professional Services J-79 60139 National Plant Services,Inc. 27,179.32 Vacuum Truck Services 60140 Orange County Water District 1,512,938.44 Joint GWRS Project J-36 60141 Pioneer Amerl Inc. 128,994.84 Sodium Hypochlodle 60142 Sancon Engineering,Inc. 43,410.00 Construction-Manhole Rehabilitation Program 60143 Science Applications International 27.032.72 Ocean Monitoring MO B&94 60144 Tule RanchlMagan Fames 202.324.30 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 60145 U.S.Metro Group,Inc. 26,235.00 Janitorial&Floor Maintenance at Plants 18,2 80146 U.S.Peroxide,L.L.C. 164.347.60 Odor&Corrosion Control Treatment for Coll.Sys.;Hydrogen Peroxide&Ferrous Chlorde 60147 Waste Markets Corp. 25.230.17 Malnl.Agreement-Gnt&Screenings Removal&Digester Bed MaVl.Removal 60148 DenBcer Engineering&Construction 65,734.20 Construction SP-74 60149 J F Shea Conetruclion,Inc. 585,322.16 Construction 132-85,J-35-2,J-71.3 60150 Margate Construction,Inc. 1,606,776.00 Construction Pl37 60151 Morrow-Meadows Corp. 342,261.00 Construction P2-473 60152 Southern Contracting Company $4,215.00 Construction J-33-IA 60153 Orange County Sanitation District 25,146.45 Worked's Comp.Roimb. 60154 Abatix Environmental Corp. 225.09 Hardware 60155 Able Scale Repair 600.00 Loading Scales Quarterly Inspection 60156 AccuStandard 748.10 Lob Supplies 60157 Advance Business Graphics 2,469.50 Printing 60158 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 5,006.22 Engine Parts&Supplies 60159 Air&Waste Management Assoc. 595.00 Air Quality&Special Projects Meeting Registration 60160 Filter Supply Company 366.00 Filters 60161 Airco Filter Service 342.53 Lab Parts&Supplies 60162 Ages Safety 2,597.63 Safety Supplies&Equipment Mrztn7c EXHIBIT Pe H:Wepa9ntEXCELdUN220VP$1 E\Clalme Paid RepadK0s0 \CWiaa Paid Report-0315W,yia Page 2 of 313WA4 A Claims Paid From 03101104 to 03115104 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 60163 American Fidelity Assurance Company 66.00 Employee Cancer Insurance 60164 American Industrial Hygiene Conference 640.00 Safety&Health Meeting Registration 60165 American Red Cross 931.00 CPR Training&Miscellaneous Supplies 60166 Aquarium Doctor 203.34 Human Resources Aquarium Service 60167 Atlantis Pool Care 500.00 Service Agreement-Admin.Bldg.Atrium 60168 AAPC-American Association of Political 790.00 Communications Meeting Registration 60169 ACCU-Sludge 737.77 Lab Supplies 60170 ACS Hydraulics,Inc. 433.52 Repair Services-Hydraulic Motor 60171 AKM Consulting Engineers 9,198.55 Professional Services 7-36,7-39,7-41 -Trunk Sewer Improvements 60172 ASMS Conference 65.00 Membership 60173 American Telephone 8 Telegraph Corp. 205.65 Telephone Service 60174 AT&T Wireless Services 3,322.12 Wireless Phone Services 00175 ATCC 174AO Lab Parts B Supplies 60176 Baker Tanks 2.550.75 Tank Rentals 60177 Battery Specialties 420.49 Batteries 60178 Bauer Compressors 339.73 Annual Testing,Repairs&Refill of SCBA Units 60179 Benz Compressed Air Systems,Inc. 879.24 Air Filters 60180 BioMerieua Vitek,Inc. 1,079.08 Lab Supplies 60181 Brand Scaffold Rental&Erection,Inc. 377.36 Scaffolding Erection&Dismantling Services at Pit.2 60182 Bush&Associates,Inc. 482.00 Professional Services J-77 60183 Bykowskl Equipment&Engineering 5,155.51 Heal Exchanger Plates 60184 California Hazardous Services,Inc. 700.00 Tank Integrity Testing 60185 Calmol,Inc. 3,121.63 Repairs&Maintenance Materials 60186 Cambridge Isotope Labs 1,533.09 Lab Parts&Supplies 60187 Charles P.Crowley Co. 3.775.04 Pressure Relief Valves 60188 Cingular Wireless Equipment 3,606.20 Tax on Free Telephone Equipment 60189 City of Fullerton 6,000.00 Adjustment of(6)Manhole Covers to Grade 60190 Coast Rubber Stamp Mfg. 440.92 Office Supplies 60191 Common Ground Alliance 100.00 Membership 60192 Communications Performance Group,Inc 12,500.00 Prof.Sm.-Emergency Response Plan&Hazardous Energy Control Procedures 60193 Communications Supply Corp. 418.44 Communications Equipment 60194 Compressor Components of California 3,543.33 Compressor Parts 60195 Computational Systems,Inc. 1,673.47 Instrument Parts&Supplies 60196 Computer Protection Technology,Inc, 1,198.08 Computer Maint. 60197 Computer Sciences Corp. 11,077.76 Consulting&Lab Services-Assay Pilot Project 60198 Consolidated Elect.Distributors,Inc. 3.774.12 Electrical Supplies 60199 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 16.29 Plumbing Supplies 60200 Coordinated Wire Rope&Rigging 607.88 Rigging Supplies 60201 Corporate Express 8,504.01 Office Supplies 60202 Corporate Image Maintenance,Inc. 160.00 Custodial Services Spec. No.9899-09 60203 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1,448.24 Electrical Paris&Supplies 60204 Culligan of Orange County 37.60 Malnt.Agreement-Can Gen Water Softener System 60205 CDW Government,Inc. 1,491.60 Software Maintenance 60206 CGvL Engineers 2,942.04 Professional Services P7-94 60207 CRG Marine Laboratories.Inc 5,925.00 Lab Analysis 60205 CWEA 2002 Annual Conference 530.00 Pit.l Operations Training Registration(Calif.Water Environment Assoc.) 60209 CWEA Membership 708.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. nvz+ac EXHIBIT A H:wepIMMEXCEL 00121YJW`511 Et Weis PaM Ra xxA03.(M CWms Peld ReVxt-03110,4vis Page 3 of 9 3=2001 Claims Paid From 03/01/04 to 03115/04 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 60210 Dalke&Sons Constructions, Inc. 16,786.00 Fume Hood Installation;Stainless Sink Installation&Board Room Platform Removal 60211 David's Tree Service 6,710.00 Tree Maim.Service 60212 Del MarAnalyliral 2,208.00 Analysis of Bloaolids and Wastewater 80213 Detection Instruments Corporation 555.68 Calibration&Certification of Sulfide Monitoring Equipment 60214 Dobbe tin&Associates 2.300.00 CAD Design for Simulator 60215 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 198.11 Paint Supplies 60216 DIRECTV 384.68 Subscription 60217 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 614.18 Electrical Supplies 60218 Ecology Control Industries 15,557.50 Had amours Waste Disposal 60219 Edinger Medical Group,Inc. 1.106.00 Medical Screening 60220 Enchanter,Inc. 3,600.00 Ocean Monitoring&Outfall Inspection&Maintenance 60221 Entech Instruments,Inc. 5.776.93 Lob Pans&Supplies 60222 Environmental Engineering&Contracting 24,000.00 Advanced Industrial Wastewater Treatment Operator Training 60223 Environmental Microbiology Consulting 11.305.00 Professional Services J-40.6 60224 Environmental Resource Association 634.10 Lab Parts&Supplies 60225 Environmental Science Associate 13,697.68 Professional Services J40-5 60226 Equapac 1,623.29 Hydrochloric Acid 80227 Excel Door&Gate Company,Inc. 2,555.95 Maintenance&Repair Services 60228 Expertune 1.004.00 Sofviare Maintenance 00229 Emedoo 769.42 Identification Signs 60230 ENS Resources.Inc. 15,000.D0 Professional Services-Legislative Advocate 60231 F4dEx Corporatlon 273.42 Air Freight 60232 Filtedlne Corporation 152.71 Filters 60233 Fisher Scientific Company 3,292.29 Lab Supplies 60234 Forensic Analytical Specialties 30.00 Asbestos Analysed&Mlcroscopy 60235 Fonis Benefits Insurance Company 24,396.45 Long-Tenn&Short-Term Disability Ins.Premium 60236 Fountain Valley Rancho Hand Wash 543.70 Truck Wash Service 60237 Franklin Covey 130.33 Office Supplies 60238 Pryor Semmars/Career Track 179.00 Instrumentation&Electrical Maintenance Training Registration 60239 Frys Electronics 297.89 Computer Supplies 60240 Ganshl Lumber Company 365.16 Lumber/Hardware 60241 GenaB-Callahan Company 3,054.24 Chemicals 80242 Gierlich-Mitchell,Inc. 3,600.20 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 60243 Grainger,Inc. 8,518.49 Electrical Pans&Supplies 60244 Haeker Equipment Company 577.01 MIsc.Vehicte,Parts,Repairs&Service 60245 Hach cJo Ponton Industries 2,020.53 Lab Parts&Supplies 60246 Hagemeyer North America 4,261.50 Prescription Safety Glasses 60247 Harold Primrose Ice 74.00 Ice For Samples 60248 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 7,483.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60249 Herb's Blackforesl Bakery&Deli 37.50 Meeting Expenses 60260 Herman Miller Workplace Resource 75.00 Filing Cabinet Rapers 00251 Hill Brothers 14,024.09 Chemicals-Odor&Corrosion ContnN-Newport Tmnkline 60252 Home Depot 952.27 Misc. Repair&Maintenance Material 60253 Hopkins Technical Products 5,310.03 Pump Supplies 60254 Holey Equipment Company 1.461.04 Plumbing Pads&Supplies 00255 Hub Auto Supply 215.80 Vehicle Pans&Supplies 60256 City of Huntington Beach 19,641.42 Water Use RN210f4 EXHIBITA. H:WapMMEXCEL.dW220NP9HME1paMa Par ReporApOnCYImr Paid Rapod-031504.rb Page 4 of 313crAN Claims Paid From 03101104 to 03/15/04 ` Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 60257 Mexx 6,077.10 Lab Supplies 60268 Industrial Daldbution Group 1,958.72 Mechanical&Paint Supplies&Tools 60259 Information Resources 500.00 Human Resources Service-Background Checks 60260 In(ratek Computer,Inc. 470.61 NeNrerk&Server Maintenance 60261 Iron Mountain 86.06 Bid Document Storage Fees P1-37 60262 Irvine Ranch Water District 3.65 Water Use 60263 IIR Exhibitions,Inc. 7,800.00 Envinm.Compli.&Monitoring Training Registration and Project Mgmt Meeting Registration 60264 ISEC,Inc. 12.985.00 Lab Fume Hood 60265 J.G.Tucker and Son.Inc. 1,727.39 Instrument Parts&Supplies 60266 Jamison Engineering Contractors,Inc. 24,295.00 Corot-Install Concrete Pads for Storage Tanks at Pit.2&Repairs to Digester#12 60267 Jays Calming 1,565.55 Meeting Expenses 60268 Johnstone Supply 207.95 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60269 Kelly Paper 470.44 Stationery&Office Supplies 60270 Kent Fluid Pourer Div.of AIT 100.13 Mechanical Pans&Supplies 60271 L&N Image Apparel 31.80 VIP Award Program-Logo Shins 60272 Lab Safety Supply.Inc. 340.14 Safety Supplies 60273 League Of California Cities 120.00 Publication 60274 Leak Busters,Inc 3.153.00 Professional Services-Electo-Scan Pilo(Study 60275 Lexis-Nexis 10.92 Books&Publications 60276 Lindell L.Marsh,Attorney at Law 2,500.00 Legislative Advocacy-Santa Ana River Interceptor Project 60277 Long Beach Lice-% 703.63 Repair&Maintenance Services-Sandblast&Recoating Trailer 60278 LuaPa Gourmet Foods,Inc. 799.90 Meeting Expense 60279 LEDO Corporation 200.00 Lab AdminislratlordQualily Assurance Training Registration 60280 LINJER 14,832.20 Professional Service-DART MO 9-22-99 60281 Maintenance Technology Corp 514.92 Mechanical Supplies 60282 Mc Junkin Corp 2,836.80 Plumbing Supplies 60283 McBein Instruments 170.00 Instrument Maintenance 60284 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 1246.92 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60285 Medlin Controls Co. 1,482.71 Instrument Supplies 60286 Michael Asner Consulting 5.449.60 Prof.Serv.-Develop an RFP Process&Evaluate Guidelines for Long-Range Bicsolids Plan 60287 Michael Tumipseed&Associates 1.067.50 Professional Service-Tula Ranch&Yakima Sites Study 60288 Mission Abrasive&Janitorial Supplies 41.59 Janitorial Supplies 60289 Mission Uniform Service 665.50 Uniform Rentals 60290 Mitchell Instrument Co. 921.00 Instruments 60291 Moodys Investor's Service 5,000.00 COP Rating Annual Maintenance Fees-Series 1992 Refunding 60292 Mykrolis Corporation 687.45 Recalibrelion of Mass Flow Controllers 60293 MCR Technologies.Inc. 16.244.53 Electromagnetic Flow Meter&Simulator 60294 Municipal Equipment Maintenance Assac. 50.00 Membership 60295 National Fire Protection Association 245.00 Membership 60296 National Institute for Standards&Tech 10.350.00 On-Site Training-Violence Prevention 60297 Neal Supply Co. 49.78 Plumbing Supplies 60298 New Horizons CLC of Santa Ana 320.00 Planning Training Registration 60299 Newark Electronics 112.82 Electrical Supplies 60300 Ninyo&Moore Corporate Accounting 13,345.02 Professional Services-Materials Testing,Inspection&Geotechnical Engrg. 60301 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 63.54 Steel Tags 60302 NAFA,Inc 177.00 Publication 60303 Office Depot Business Services Div. 4,037.23 Office Supplies awxlak EXHIBIT A H^4a11M1E%CEL.dIe@20NPSHARE1CWraS Paid Repo,l%03 NkCraimc Paid RaVA-031-0 xv Page 5of9 MOY2004 Claims Paid From 03/01104 to 03115104 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 60304 OneSource Distributors,Inc. 315.72 Electrical Pans&Supplies 60306 Orange County Hose Company 352.16 Hydraulic Hose Supplies&Parts 60306 Orange County Winwater Works 9.81 Plumbing Supplies 60307 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 209.80 Plumbing Supplies 60308 Oxygen Service Company 3,769.26 Specialty Gases 60309 OCASSE 170.00 Safety&Health Meeting Registration 00310 OCB Reprographics 5,585.51 Printing Service-MO 1126100 60311 OCDM Marketing 553.40 Processing Fees-Public Notice Melling&Postage 60312 P.L.Hewn Company,Inc. 437.51 Electrical Supplies 60313 P.S.Jobs 99.00 Notices&Ads 60314 Pacific Bell Internet Services 328.93 Internet Service 60315 Pacific Mechanical Supply 84.15 Plumbing Supplies W316 Palomar Reprographics,Inc. 4,380.77 Printing Services 60317 Paramount Fabricators 1.850.07 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60318 Parker Supply Company 4.953.90 Mechanical Pens&Supplies 60319 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 300.56 Tires 6032D Partners Consulting Services 16.380.00 FIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 60321 Paldot Video Productions 470.37 Video Services 60322 PenValve 275.75 Mechanical Pane&Supplies 60323 Plumbers Depot,Inc. 1,271.45 High Pressure Hydro Hoes,&Parts 60324 Poster Compliance Center 370.73 Federal&State Compliance Posters 60325 Postmaster General 150.00 Bulk Mail Penult 60326 Praxeir Distribution,Inc. 15.08 Lab Supplies 60327 Praxair,Inc. 30.01 Lab Supplies 60328 Pre-Paid Legal Services,Inc 433.55 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium OD329 Presskits 1,401.90 Printing BM30 Primary Source Office Furnishings,Inc. 14,184.59 Office Fixtures&Modifications&Reconfiguration of Work Stations 6=1 Profit Techniques,Inc. 1,437.50 Professional Services-O&M Management Coaching 60332 Project Management Institute 154.00 Membership 60333 Pump Engineering 31.00 Freight 60334 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 4.261.74 Pump Supplies 60335 PCG Industries 1,925.00 Repair&Maintenance Services 60336 PCS Express,Inc. 110.00 Courier Service 60337 PRSA-Orange County Chapter 970.00 Communications Meeting Registration 00338 R.L.Abbott&Associates 9,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 60339 Rainbow Disposal Co. 2,730.93 Trash Removal 60340 Red Valve Company,Inc. 135.55 Mechanical Supplies 60341 Reliastar 9,768.05 Employee Basic Life Insurance 60342 Rellastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 9,798.00 Employee Life Ins.Premium,Short-Term Disability&Cancer Ins.Payroll Deductions 60343 Richard Chang Associates,Inc. 4,199.00 On-Site Training-Expanding Influence 60344 Ricoh Business System 1,823.90 Color Copier Lease 60345 Robert J.Lung&Assoc 352.34 Professional Services-Aerial Pholos of Plata 1 60346 Royale Cleaners 76.00 Uniform Cleaning 60347 Rutan&Tucker,L.L.P. 1.003.05 Legal Services J-33-1A 60348 Ryan Henn Products Corp. 22.97 Plumbing Paris&Supplies 60349 RD Instruments 1,020.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 60350 RMS Engineering&Design,Inc. 3,655.00 Engineering Services-Seismic Evaluation Report&J-89 flNlldlc EXHIBITA' KWW,n1E%CEL4WZpMSHP EK'Aelms Pald R.,rM %Claims Pald RdprM-M15a1.rds Page 6 of 9 3130r064 Claims Paid From 03I01104 to 03/15/04 ` Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 60351 RPM Electric Motors 2,241.90 Sump Pump 60352 Saddleback Materials Co.,Inc. 255.00 Sand 60353 Safe-T-Rack Systems,Inc. 1,249.90 Lab Parts&Supplies 60354 Safety-Kleen 539.26 Parts Washer Lease&Service 60355 Sclnving America,Inc 2.113.71 Pump Supplies 60356 Scott Specialty Gases.Inc. 46.53 Freight 60357 Scetlel Voice&Data,Inc. 2284.80 Telephone System Maintenance 60358 Merrill F.Seiler 46.00 Meeting7Training Expense Reimbursement 60359 Shamrock Supply Co..Inc. 167.05 Repairs&Maintenance Supplies 60360 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 662.30 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60361 Siemens Building Technologies 145.00 Professional Services-Troubleshooting Administration Bldg.Automation System 60362 SkiliPath On-Site 3,300.00 OnSne Training-MS Word XP 60363 SkillPalh Seminars 199.00 Source Control Training Registration 60364 Smardan Supply Company 1,757.65 Plumbing Supplies 60365 Smith Pipe&Supply,Inc 221.68 Plumbing Supplies 60366 Smith-Emery Company 990.50 Soils.Concrete&Omer Materials Testing 60367 So.Cal.Gas Company 22,551.37 Natural Gas 60368 Solar Biologicals,Inc 437.50 Lab Paris&Supplies 60369 South Coast Water 768.61 Water System Supplies 60370 Southern California Edison 6.235.96 Power 60371 Southern California SETAC 20.00 Membership 60372 Southern California Water 58.33 Water Use 60373 Southern Counties Lubricants 2,343.83 Egine Oil 60374 Specialty Technical Publishers,Inc. 420.00 Publication 60375 Spez Certiprep,Inc. 263.16 Lab Supplies 60376 Summit Steel 372.59 Metal 60377 Su set Ford 12.20 Auto Parts&Service 60378 Su set Industrial Parts 2,029.08 Mechanical Supplies 60379 SCTNA 150.00 Membership 60380 SETAC 120.00 Membership 60381 SPEC Services,I= 15.468.81 Engineering Services J-33.1 60382 Taylor-Dunn 539.69 Electric Cart Pans 60383 Team Scopellile Co. 1,399.20 Professional Services-Relocation of Laboratory Liquid Gas at PIL 1 60384 The Walking Man,Inc. 575.00 Construmion Notice Distribution-Bushard Trunk Sewer Replacement 60385 Thomas Gray&Assoc. 198.00 Biosolids Analysis 60386 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 9,712.44 Mechanical Supplies 60387 Tlcor Title Company of California 1,200.00 Preliminary Report,Legal Description&Site Drawing of Commercial Property 60388 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services 60389 Torrys Lack&Safe Service&Sales 118.00 Locks It Keys 60390 Tranacal 45124 Thermal Labeling Machine 60391 Truck&Auto Supply.Inc. 87.73 Automotive Supplies 60392 Truesdell Laboratories,Inc. 2,095.00 Analysis of Biosol'ids and Wastevaler 60393 Ultra Scientific 1,144.35 Lab Supplies 60394 Update International,Inc. 3,483.33 Employee Development Training Registration 60395 Urban Alternatives 4,567.00 Professional Services-Community Relations Re Ellis Ave.&Rocky Pt.Pump SM. 60396 US Filter Westales Carbon 135.07 Freight 60397 Valley Detroit Diesel Allison 269A2 Motor O0 ruyylork EXHIBITA R:WepMn1F.XCEL4�NaaWS�ims Pea Repom oCekns Pore Repom.0315e4.XN Page 7 of 3rwrmoe Claims Paid From 03/01/04 to 03/15/04 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 60398 Varian,Inc. 3,625.10 Lab Pam&Supplies 60399 Vedzon California 1,926.63 Telephone Services 60400 Veme's Plumbing 250.00 Service Contract-Testing&Cart.Backlim Devices at Phil.1&2&Pump Ste. 60401 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 9,274.08 Vision Service Premium 60402 Vaster&Compsmy 727.77 Mechanical Supplies 60403 V L Systems,Inc. 700.00 Professional Services-Exchange Upgrade&Support 60404 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 13.981.91 Lab Supplies 60405 The Wackenhut Corporation 5.612.60 Seedy Guards 60406 Waters Corporation 9,009A2 Instrument Parts&Supplies 60407 Winds Sanitary Supply 269.23 Janitorial Supplies 60408 Wilson Supply,Inc 5.39 Plumbing Supplies 60409 Winter Kelly Consulting Engineers 540.00 Professional Services-Asbestos Study 60410 WEF 594.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 60411 W EFTEC 575.00 Source Control Meeting Registration 60412 Xerox Corp.-OMNI 21.00 Fax Machine Maintenance 60413 Xerox Corporation 11,543.50 Fax&Copier Leases 60414 Adam/Mallory Construction Co.,Inc. 24,915.49 Construction P2-79.1 60415 California Bank&Trust 9,357.00 Construction J-33-IA,Retention 60416 James L.Burror 237.45 MeegngRraining Expense Reimbursement 60417 Dlndo A.Carrillo 232.00 Meeting?raining Expanse Reimbursement 60418 Richard A.Castilian 722.52 Meeting/fmining Expense Reimbursement 60419 James E.Colston 385.70 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 60420 Carla D.Dillon 1.271.54 Meeting/7reining Expense Reimbursement 60421 Chuck M.Forman 283.70 Meetingri'mIning Expense Reimbursement 60422 Robert P.Ghirelli 199.65 Maeting/fraining Expense Reimbursement 60423 James D.Herberg 177.00 MeetingfTralning Expense Reimbursement 60424 Deirdre E.Hunter 999.09 Meetingrrmining Expanse Reimbursement 60425 Chandra R.Johannesson 129.00 Mestingrimining Expense Reimbursement 60426 Hardal S.Khublell 150.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 60427 Linda Losurdo 250.00 Meeling/7mining Expense Reimbursement 60428 David A.Ludwin 177.00 Meeting/7mining Expense Reimbursement 60429 Michael D.Moore 281.00 Meetingrimining Expense Reimbursement 60430 Fred J.O'Brian 268.33 Meeting/7reining Expense Reimbursement 60431 Madankumar B.Patel 578.19 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 60432 Curt V.Shelp 170.00 Meeting/7mming Expense Reimbursement 60433 Ann Tobin 220.00 Mesting/7reinirg Expense Reimbursement 60434 WEF 227.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 60435 Paula A.Zeller 527.69 Meating/7raining Expense Reimbursement 60436 County of Orange 43.00 Annexation Fees 60437 County of Orange 43.00 Annexation Fees 60438 Employee Activity Committee 116.00 Service Award Expense 60439 Lisa Callerts 1,31823 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 60440 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fees 60441 Loral Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fees 60442 Orange County Sanitation District 1,670.30 Petty Cash Reimb. 60443 Reynolds,Roy&Computers of America 107167 Employee Computer Loan Program Total Accounts Payable-Warrants 9,330,483.45 frd21M EXHIBIT A H:1dep11fn%EXCEL41eV3rMMSHPAE1GaImr Paid Repro 04131aims PM ReVA-011504.4; Page 8 of "",A4 -1 Claims Paid From 03101/04 to 03115M ' Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Payroll Disbursements 33268-33360 Employee Paychecks $ 154,766.74 Biweekly Payroll 03/03/04 95098-95609 Direct Deposit Statements 994,123.65 Biweekly Payroll 03/03/04 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,148,6NMI Wire Transfer Payments JP Morgan Chase Bank 27,933.15 February Interest Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation JP Morgan Chase Bank 133,387.28 Societe Generale February Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 161,320.43 Total Claims Paid 03/01/04-03/15104 $ 70,640,694.27 arvs101x EXHIBITA 4:1depUnE%CEL.OraV20VPSI-1 E1CniOS PON Re0gIW3-06\GbImS Paid ReW-03150<xb Page 9of9 3I30cX04 Claims Paid From 03/16/04 to 03/31/04 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable-Wamams 6"" American Express $ 46,036.12 Purchasing Card Program,Misc.Supplies&Services 6D445 City of Fountain Valley 264.221.55 Cooperative Projects 60446 City of Santa Ana 250,D00.00 Cooperative Projects 60447 City of Villa Park 124,976.00 Cooperative Projects 60448 Orange County Water District 69,486.94 GAP Water Use 60449 Propipe 34,957.31 CCTV Sewedine Inspection 60450 Synagro Technologies,Inc. 253,372.76 Residuals Removal MO 3.29.95 60451 Water 3 Engineering,Inc. 34.271.29 Engineering Services J67 60452 Alrbame Express 136.84 Air Freight 60453 Airgas Safety,Inc. 577.87 Safety Supplies 6D454 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 1,407.33 Telephone Conference Services 60455 Cingular Wireless Aidime 11.020.71 Cellular Phone Services 60456 City of Buena Park 7,732.23 Cooperative Projects W457 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 60458 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 586.75 Plumbing Supplies 60459 County of Orange 182.14 Wage Garnishment 60460 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 60461 Elecha-Bond,Inc. 3.576.79 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Fusion Bond Epoxy Coaling 60462 Employee Benefits Specialists.Inc. 9,609.35 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 60463 Court Order 445.00 Wage Gamishmenl W464 FedEx Corporation 1,051.92 Air Freight 60465 Franchise Tax Board 100.00 Wage Garnishment 60466 Frys Electronics 358.93 Computer Supplies 60467 Government Finance Officers Association 440.00 Membership 60468 Intemal Revenue Service 300.00 Wage Garnishment 60469 Internal Revenue Service 2D0.00 Wage Garnishment 60470 Intl.Union of Oper.Eng.AFL-CIO Local 501 3.892.10 Dues Deduction 50471 InExcess Awards 67.05 Sales Tax 60472 IIR Exhibitors,Inc. 1,300.00 Information Technology Meeting Registration 80473 Klenow Associates,Inc. 11,241.11 Legal Services 1.2.4 60474 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 2.4" Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60475 Midway Mfg&Machining Co. 2,26&61 Repair&Maintenance Service 60476 National Bond&Trust 2,537.75 U.S.Savings Benda Payroll Deduction 60477 Nextai Communications 1,999.40 Cellular Phone Services 60478 The Orange County Register 1.288.48 Notices&Ads 60479 OCEA 509.73 Dues Deduction, 60480 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 60481 Partners Consulting Services 10,380.00 PIS On-Site Support-One World XE Migration Project 60482 Cpurt Order 298.00 Wage Garnishment 60483 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,557.00 Dues Deduction 60484 Public Resources Advisory Group 7,500.00 Financial Advisory Services 60485 Southern California Edison 1,513.73 Power 60486 Summit Steel 836.17 Metal 60487 SBC 70.56 Telephone Services 60488 Thompson Indusmal Supply,Inc. 1,303.07 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60489 Times Community News 318.75 Noticas&Ada 60490 United Parcel Service 53.28 Parcel Services H WepmflME%GEL.OIa13301PP3X/•RE1Wima Pab Rex ftx$0dCsm;Pop ReW-W3104.W EXHIBIT B IM1V31Nk Page 1 of 9 w14am4 Claims Paid From 03/16104 to 03131/04 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 60491 United States Treasury 13.737-61 Professional Services J-85-Naval Post Graduate School 60492 United Way 255.00 Employee ConMbutions 60493 Verson California 5,673-79 Telephone Services 60494 Cam Order 597.50 Wage Garnishment 60495 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 60496 ADS Environmental Services,Inc. 03.102.86 Professional Services-J-73-2 60497 Bell Land Surveying 26.258.91 Professional Surveying Services-Various Capital Projects 60498 Black&Veatch Corporation 132,169.63 Engineering Services J-71J,J-87,P7-76,5-58&P2-85 60499 Boyle Engineering Corporation 34,910.38 Engineering Services 1-24 60500 Brown&Caldwell 68,319.51 Professional Services PI-37 and O&M Manual 60501 Carollo Engineers 608,8W.68 Professional Sew.-Coom.Coming.Enterprise Sludy,P2-60,P2-66&SP-90 60502 Communicators Performance Croup,Inc. 31.669.84 Prof.Sews.-Emergency Response Plan&Hazardous Energy Control Procedures 60503 Coral Energy Resources,L.P. 134,057.30 Natural Gas 60504 CH2MHill 38.490.13 Professional Services J40-7 60505 Dell Computer 31,060.14 (1)PowerEdge Server 6050fi Environments[Science Associate(ESA) 25.816.17 Professional Services J40-5 It J40-10 60507 Gmybar Electric Company 29,151.06 Computer Hardware/So&w3ro 60508 IPMC cfo Parsons 1.061.358.00 Professional Services-Integrated Program Management 60509 Kemiron PadBc,Inc. 165,132.17 Fame Chloride MO 9-27-95 60510 Kforce,Inc. 38,163.62 Temporary Employment Services 60511 NWRI National Water Research Institute 32,70928 Professional Services-Asset Management Strategic Plan 6D512 Orange County Employees 514,014.00 M02 Early Retirement Incentive Program 6D513 Parsons.Inc. 51,795.71 Engineering Services J42 60514 Pioneer Americas,Inc. 226,595.59 Sodium Hypochlome OD515 Polydyne,Inc. 96,083.35 Cationic Polymer MO 3.11-92 6D516 Southern California Edison 86.849.18 Power 60517 Synagro Technologies,Inc. 211,936.86 Residuals Removal MO 3-29.95 60518 Syslime Computer Corp 26,169.00 Professional Services-J D Edwards One World XE Support 60519 Taylor-Dunn 51.523.18 (7)Electric Carts 60520 ThyssenKmpp Elevator Corporation 32.261.00 Elevator Maintenance 60521 Tule Ranch/Magan Farm 227,898.95 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 605M TeKsyslems 51.12D.00 Temporary Employment Services 60523 U.S.Peroxide,L.L.C. 154,427.11 Odor&Corrosion Conkol Treatment for Coll.Sys.;Hydrogen Peroxide&Ferrous Chloride 60524 UBS Financial Services,Inc. 38,057.82 Remarketing Fee-2000 A&B Refunding COPS . 60525 Vills Ford 27,627.88 (1)Ford 2004 F350,Cn w-Cab.One-Ton Pick-Up with Tommy Uft Gate 60526 Woodruff.Spradlin IS Smart 104,979.43 Legal Services MO 7-26.95 60527 J F Shea Construction,Inc. 1,611,587.70 Construction J-77 6GS28 Paulus Engineering,Inc. 147,061.60 Construction 5-22-RI 60529 Steve P Rados.Inc. 774,532.80 Construction 1-24 60530 Union Bank of California 86,059.20 Construction 1-24.Retention 60531 Agilent Technologies.Inc. 5.331.86 Lab Paris&Supplies 60532 Alrgas-West 630.09 Lab Parts&Supplies 60533 Alrgas Safety,Inc. 1,407.59 Safety Supplies&Equipment 60534 Attract Thomlon 2.372.62 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 60535 American Airlines 4.222.60 Travel Services 60536 American Seal&Packing 1,105.36 Injectable Packing Supplies 60537 American Tramoo.Inc. 790.00 Air Quality&Special Projects Training Registration 60538 Analytical Products Group,Inc. 371.00 Lab Pads It Supplies HmepMn1EJ LMa1220NPSr MIRMS Pad RaWW3M08fms PaJ Re -03310<.tl5 EXHIBIT rw IM Page 2 of 9 a1vzW ^ Claims Paid From 031161O4 to 03/31104 Warred No. Vendor Amount Description 60539 Appeone Employment Service 14,052.78 Temporary Employment Services 60540 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs, Inc. 750.00 Toxicity Testing 60541 Arch Wireless 1.605.25 Airtime,Service&Equipment 60542 Awards&Trophies Company MAT Plaques 60543 ABS do Harold Wells Associates 2,506.27 Instrument Parts&Supplies 60544 ACR Syslems,Inc. 987.41 Instrument Parts&Supplies 60545 AKM Consulting Engineers 9,124.34 Professional Services 7.36,7.39,7-41 -Trunk Sewer Improvements 60546 American Telephone&Telegraph Corp. 2.265.57 Telephone Service 60547 AVO International 4,062.00 Instrumentation&Electrical Maintenance Training Registration 60548 Basic Chemical Solutions 24,184.67 Sodium Blsulgle 60549 Bearings&Ddves, Inc. 9.877.29 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60550 Boiler and Steam Parts.cem 672.50 Safely Valves 6D551 Bongarde Conmunica0ons,Ltd. 318.95 Subscription 60552 Bush&Associates,Inc. 4.256.00 Surveying Services MO 6.25-97 60553 BC Wire Rope&Rigging 1.034.40 Wire Rope W554 California Comfort Van. 4.633.25 Interim Modifications o Vehicle 464 60555 California Relocation Services,Inc. 247.50 File Moving/Relocallon Services 60556 Calud,Inc. 916.62 Actuator 60557 Cambridge Isotope Labs 2,359.37 Lab Parts&Supplies 60558 Cameron Welding Supply 166.94 Welding Supplies W559 Cappo,Inc. 450.00 Membership 60560 Cashes,Inc. 862.78 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60561 Cell2Cell 32.93 Phones&Accessories 60562 Clean Street,Inc. 475.00 Street Sweeping Services 60563 Clemson University 3,700.00 Mechanical Maintenance&Power Production Training Registration 60564 Columbia Analyticel Services,Inc. 1.755.00 Analysis of wastewater.Industrial Wa.tawafer&Blceolid. 60565 Compressor Components of California 1,131.00 Coll Cleaning&Testing 60566 Computer Sciences Corp. 10,341.44 Consulting&Lab Services-Assay Pion Project 60567 Condor Freight Lines 47.64 Freight 60568 Consolidated Elect Distributors,Inc. 2,000.13 Elmtriml Supplies 60569 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 313.25 Plumbing Supplies 60570 Corporate Express 4,92629 Office Supplies 6D571 Cost Containment Solutions 4,14BA8 Workers Comp.Services 60572 Counterpart Enterprises,Inc. 1,460.43 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60573 County Wholesale Electric Co. 1.204.15 Electrical Pans&Supplies 60574 CAPIO 275.00 Communications Meeting Registration-Calif.Assoc.of Public Info.Officials 60575 OCP Industries 4,483.48 JanilMal Supplies 60576 CR&R,Inc. 1,939.76 Container Rentals 60577 CWEA 2002 Annual Conference 640.00 Plant l Operations Training Reglstratlon-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 60578 CWEA Membership 291.00 Membership-Calif.Water Environment Assoc. 60579 Cal Mar Analytical 3.015.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 60580 Diamond H Recognition 281.05 Employee Service Awards 60581 DlglPhoo 10.95 Photographic Services 60582 Driver Alliant Insurance Service,Inc. 4.069.00 Crime Insurance Premium 50583 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 89.01 Paint Supplies 60564 DGA Consultants,Inc. 6,800.00 Professional Services-CCTV Data Evaluation 80585 DIRECTV 15.00 Subscription 60586 E.Sam Jones Distributors,Inc. 92.67 Electrical Supplies H.Wephfn�XML41a12a114P6 EOxrn.Pzld Reps A0]011CWx.5 P.16 Rep.M-=1W.4. EXHIBITB e,vxrea Page 3 of 9 Claims Paid From 03I16M to 03131104 Warmnl No. Vendor Amount Description 60587 Easy Frame Sign Company,Inc. 872.78 501h Anniversary Banners 60588 Electra-Bored 1.546.21 Repairs&Maintenance Services-Auger Assembly 60589 Employee Benefits Specialists.Inc. 634.94 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Cam 60590 Enchanter,Inc. 2.700.00 Ocean Monitoring&OUBall Inspection&Maintenance 60591 EnNronmental Express 95.00 lab Supplies 60592 Envlrprunental Resource Associates 899.10 Lab Supplies 60593 Equwpac 2,481.98 Hydrochloric Acid 60594 Excel Door&Gam Company,Inc. 1,366.00 Maintenance&Repair Services 60595 Emedce 994.02 Idenlificetion Signs 60598 ESRI,Inc. 16,944.00 SoBwarenlsmware Maintenance 60597 Fisher Scientific 979.77 Lab Supplies 60598 Fleet Pride 3.376.96 Gear Box for V-354 60599 Foodcm8 Coffee&Refreshment Services 299.60 Meeting Supplies 60600 Fountain Valley Rancho Hand Wash 237.95 Tmdc Wash Tickets 60601 Franklin Covey 336.55 Office Supplies 60602 Frys Electronics 500.93 Computer Supplies 60503 Full Spectrum Analytics,Inc. 832.00 Lab Instrument Service W604 Gardner Denver 445.32 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60605 GarmB-Callahan Company 3,337.89 Chemicals 60606 George Yardley Co. 39.02 Lab Supplies 60607 Getinge Castle 532.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance&Service 60608 Gilmour Group do Lippincott Co. 1,153.92 Hoses 60609 Golden Stale Controls 678.93 Electrical Supplies 60510 Grainger,Inc. 7.601.35 Motors W611 Great Western Sanitary Supplies 423.33 Janimdal Supplies 60612 Guarantee Records Management 175.78 Ott-Site Records Storage 60613 Haaker Equipment Company 539.93 MIsc.Vehide,Parts,Repairs&Service 60614 Hach do Pontou Industries 29224 Lab Parts&Supplies 60615 Hach Company 19,617.89 Lab Supplies 60616 Hach Company 1,821.00 Lab Pans&Supplies 60617 Haldeman Inc. 915.58 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60618 Harold Primrose Ice 217.00 Ice For Samples 60519 Harrington Industrial Plastics,Inc. 4,433.67 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60620 Hello DIMCL Inc. 205.03 Telephone Headsets 60621 Hill Brothers 10,621.74 Chemicals-Oder&Corrosion Control-Newport Tmnkline 60622 Hill House Products 319.68 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60623 Home Depot 477.62 Misc Repair&Maintenance Material 60624 Hub Auto Supply 144.04 Vehicle Paris&Supplies 60625 HI Standard Automotive 144.58 Automott"Paris&Supplies 60628 HR Only 1,620.00 Temporary Employment Services 60627 Idexx 7.704.92 Lab Supplies 60628 Industrial Dlstribu0m Group 4,208.16 Lab Parts&Supplies 60629 Industrial Metal Supply 134.47 Metal 60630 Industrial Threaded Products,Inc. 9.573.00 Mechanical&Paint Supplies&Locks 60631 Inteq Group 2.430.00 Programming&Database Systems Meeting Registration 60632 IBM Corporation-Way 1,888.27 Computer Hardware Maintenance-Tape Loader&I Series 400 60633 Interstate Batteries of Cal Coast 683.51 Batteries for Vehicles&Cans 60634 Irvine Photo Graphics 98.06 Photographic Services H:We0ME%CELdWUoVAPSHARE\G2:m5 Pad RepMW31YKAdIm9 Pa9 Repad-0MMMMIS e4 EXHIBIT Page of rmalwc 9 &132564 Claims Paid From 03/16/04 to 03/31104 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 60635 Irvine Ranch Water District 36.35 Water Use 60636 J&L Industrial Supply 683.79 Tads 60637 J.G.Tucker and Son,Inc 6,332.38 Instrument&Mechanlml Pam,Supplies&Signs 60638 Jays Catering 1,40SA2 Meeting Expenses 60639 John Wiley&Sons,Inc. 94.94 Subscription 60640 Kam Advance Motorists,Inc. 4.993.75 Engineering Services-Analysis of WAS Pump Failure 50847 Kelly Paper 296.10 Paper 50642 Lob Safety Supply,Inc. 239.21 Lab Pam&Supplies 80643 Lee&Re,Inc. 23,342.26 Professional Services 543.1,P247-3 60644 Leds-Nexls 91.51 Books&Publications 60645 Uebed Cassidy 312.00 Professional Services-Human Resources Policies&Procedures 60646 Lued's Gourmet Foods,Inc 657.59 Meeting Expense 60647 LIMS/Leller 139.00 Subscription 60648 LRP Publications 407.50 Subscription 60640 Malcolm Firms.Inc. 24.762.67 Professional Services 1.10 60650 Management Technologies 3.075.00 Professional Services-Project Management Process 80651 MassMutual Michel Financial Group 1.302.07 Executive Disability Plan Premium 60652 Matt Chlor,Inc. 5,418.45 Valves 60653 Mayer,Brown,Rowe&Maw,L.L.P. 5.000.00 Professional Services-Strategic Planning&Advocacy 60654 McJunkln Corp. 76.75 Plumbing Supplies 60655 MCBsIn Instruments 515.00 Lab Equipment Maintenance 60656 McMaster-Cart Supply Co. 270.00 Mechanical Pam,Supplies&Tools 60657 MCRay Industdes,Inc. 009.22 Mechanical Pam&Supplies 60658 Mee Analytical System 13.118.00 Toxicity Analysis 60659 Medlin Controls Co. 105AO Instrument Supplies 60660 Michael Asner Consulting 5,815.02 Prof.Serv.-Develop an RFP Process&Evaluate Guidelines for Long-Range Blosdlds Plan 60661 Mid-West Associates 2,328.04 Pump Supplies 60662 Mission Uniform Service 3,576.69 Uniform Florida 606M Mitchell Instrument Co. 501.00 Instrument Parts&Supplies 60664 Motion Industries,Inc. 363.99 Plumbing Supplies 60665 Motorola,Inc. 688.53 Canmunication Equipment Supplies W566 MAACO Auto Painting&BWyworka 790.77 Vehicle Bodywork&Painting-V402 60567 National Plant Services,Inc. 825.00 Vacuum Truck Services 60668 Neal Supply Co. 9.98 Plumbing Supplies 60669 New Pig 301.26 Spill Absorbent Materials 60670 Northern Tool&Equipment Company,Inc. 4,199.53 Honda Generator 60671 O C Tanner Recognition Company 717.92 Employee Service Awards Program 60872 Office of Disaster Management-Area G 500.00 Books&Publications on CD 60673 Office Depot Business Services Div. 998.66 Office Supplies 80674 Orange County Vector Control District 248.08 Pest Control 60675 Orange Courier 208.10 Courier Services 60876 Orange Fluid System Technologies.Inc. 329.25 Mechanical Pam&Supplies 60677 Oxygen Service Company 1,544.96 Specialty Gases 60678 OCB Reprographics 762.14 Printing Service-MO 1/26/00 80579 P.L.Hawn Company,Inc. 1,742.39 Electrical Supplies 60680 Padfic Mechanical Supply 56.65 Plumbing Supplies 80681 Pacific Process Equipment,Inc 1.236.67 Freight 60652 Parker Supply Company 1,608.27 Mechanical Pam&Supplies K:v%pNh1EXCEL.dWU] SIWtEICkim!Pad Roxrpd30ftGeMe POW Reovt-031W d EXHIBIT pNttek Page 5 of 'mate l Claims Paid From 0311I8/04 to 03/31/04 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 60683 PenValve 674.86 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60684 Perms Pure,Inc. 233.57 Filler 60685 Poelpushers.Inc. 5,691.60 Prof.Sew.-Design,Implement,Construct&Install a Corporate Inlranel Site 60686 Power Design 4,856.86 Electrical Supplies 60687 Pumping Solutions,Inc. 1.417.60 Pump Supplies 60688 PAPA 30.00 Membership 60689 PCG Industries 2,900.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-Conveyor Assembly 60690 PCS Express,Inc. 660.00 Courier Service 60691 PFE International,Inc. 11,296.51 Folder/Inserter Office Equipment 60692 Raney Industries 3,890.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-Filler Press Drain Pans 60693 ReadyConnecl 649.50 Books&Publications S0694 Red Valve Company,Inc. 649.17 Repair&Maintenance Materials 60695 RemedyTemp,Inc. 4,240.20 Temporary Employment Services 60696 Reslek Corporation 60.71 Lab Pads&Supplies 60697 Tod W.Ridgeway, 123.00 Mesting/Tralning Expense Reimbursement 6060 Robert Ferguson 20,000.00 Professional Services J40-9 60699 Ryan Herco Products Corp. 18.17 Pump Supplies 60700 RBF Engineers 2.994.89 Engineering Services 2-24-1 60701 RMS Engineering&Design.Inc. 700.00 Engineering Services-Design Concrete Work at Pit.1 Grit Classifier 60702 RSA Sutter Soil Products 1,540.82 Soil Materials 60703 Safety-Kleen 3,922.10 Parts Washer 60704 Sancan Engineering,Inc. 4,785.00 Construction-Pump Out(3)Air Jumper Lines 60705 Science Applications International 19.258.96 Ocean Monitoring MO 6.8-94 60706 ScoOel Voice It Data,Inc. 2,284.50 Telephone System Maintenance 60707 Shamrock Supply Co.,Inc. 374.12 Mechanical Parts&Supplies and Repair Brady Label Maker 60708 Shureluck Sales&Engineering 1,506.86 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60709 Sigma-Aldrich,Inc. $47.34 Lab Paris&Supplies 00710 Smardan Supply Company 385.76 Plumbing Supplies 60711 Smith-Emery Company 1,932.75 Soils,Concrete&Other Materials Tasting 60712 So.Cal.Gas Company 6,555.10 Natural Gas 80713 Solar Slologicals,Inc. 2,625.00 Lab Parts&Supplies 80714 Southern California Edison 28.87 Power 80715 Southern California SETAC 40.00 Lab Meeting Registration 00716 Southern Counties Oil Co. 5,805.81 Diesel 00717 Sperling Instruments,Inc. S.VA.21 Instrument Supplies 00716 Spectra Gases,Inc. 12,444.76 Lab Parts&Supplies 60719 Stanley Steamer International,Inc. 349.00 Carpel Cleaning Services 60720 State Board Of Equalization 1.625.00 Hazardous Waste Fee 60721 Staywell Company,The 30.87 Publication 60722 Summit Steal 1,887.79 Metal 60723 Sunset Industrial Parts 427.81 Mechanical Supplies 80724 Symcas•TSG 1,391.60 SCADA System VAX Service Agreement 60725 SBC 16.74 Telephone Services 60726 SCP Science 314.00 Lab Supplies 60727 SKOWeaI Inc. 262.87 Lab Parts&Supplies 60728 SPX Valves&Control 4,938A8 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60729 T&C Industrial Controls,Inc. 192.33 Electrical Supplies 60730 Terminlx International 2,735.00 Peat Control HMepnaMFXCELdWUtMPSHPRE�alma Pak Repa sO kmlme PaW ReW-OnIN.xb EXHIBIT ON21M Page 6 of 9 M1arskm «, Claim Paid From 03116104 to 03/31/04 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 60731 The Procurement Connection,Inc. 64.83 Publication 60732 The Walking Man,Inc. 175.00 Construction Notice Distribution-Bayside Drive,Newport Beach 60733 Thermo Electronic Corporation 800.39 Instrument Parts&Supplies 60734 Themes V.Geriinger 500.00 Lab Analyses 60735 Thompson Induslnal Supply,Inc. 1,951.94 Mechanical Supplies 60736 Tony's Lock&Safe Service&Sales 278.27 Locks&Keys 60737 Townsend Public Affairs 5,000.00 Legislative&Executive Advocate for Grant Funding 60738 Southern California Trans Service 230.68 Mechanical&Instrument Parts&Supplies 60739 Tranter do Leonard Engineered Products 15,938.00 (1)Heal Exchanger 60740 Truck It Auto Supply,Inc 62.43 Automotive Supplies 60741 TCH Associates,Inc. 6,652.85 Lab Supplies 60742 US Filter/Polymebia,Inc. 60.00 Service Agreement-Lab Purification System 50743 Unit Scientific 627.31 Lab Supplies 60744 Underground Electric Supply 2,250.00 Repair&Maintenance Services-GE Breaker 60745 Universal Specialties.Ix. 32.02 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60746 Urban Alternatives 1,707.00 Prof.Sam.-Comm.Relations&Coaching Re Repl.of Ellis Ave.8 Rocky Print Pump Sla. 00747 The Vantage Group,L.I-C. 21,708.00 Temporary Employment Service 60748 Varian Associates,Ins 7.763.13 Lab Instrument Melnt.and Parts&Supplies 60749 Verizon California 971.16 Telephone Services 60750 Village Nurseries 63A9 Landscaping Supplies 60751 Vortex Corporation 2.841.05 Door Repair at Fleet Services 60752 VWR Scientific Products 15,023.34 Lab Supplies 60753 The Wackenhut Corporation 23,989.51 Security Guards 60754 Wade Sanitary Supply 548.00 Janitorial Supplies 60755 Western Stales Controls 1.704.63 EleMcal Paris&Supplies 60756 Wilson Supply Inc. 5.39 Plumbing Supplies 60757 WEF (106.94 Membership-Water Environment Federation 60758 Xerox Corp-OMNI 72.00 Maintenance Agreement-Fax Machine 60759 Xerox Corporation 423.04 Copier Lease 60750 Zee Medical 3.111.70 First Aid Supplies 60761 Ark Construction Co.,Inc. 15=.55 Construction Pt-62 60762 Michael J.Beet 377.50 Meefingrrmining Expense Reimbursement 60763 Michael C.Bock 102.38 Meeting/rralning Expense Reimbursement 60764 Marc A.Brown 100.00 MeetingtTralning Expense Reimbursement 60765 Jan E.Collins 498.90 MeegnglTralning Expense Reimbursement 60766 James E.Colston 199.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 60767 Kimberly A.Erickson 66.03 Moegng/Training Expense Reimbursement 60768 Tyrone C.Given 524.40 Meetingftraining Expense Reimbursement 60769 Victoria L.Henn 217.70 Meefingfrmining Expense Reimbursement 60770 Haden S.Khublzll 164.00 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60771 Deborah L.Undel 46.00 MeetingfTraming Expense Reimbursement 80772 Miriam Loyo 1.243.20 MeeUng?reining Expense Reimbursement W773 David A.Lu&dn 457.73 Meefing/7ralning Expense Reimbursement 8D774 Michael D.Moore 239.00 Meefing/Traintrig Expense Reimbursement 60775 Robed Oolen 103.02 Mwbng/Trelning Expense Reimbursement 00776 Michael Vuorg 653.38 Meetin9rrmining Expense Reimbursement 80777 Mark S.Wilson 148.00 Meefingr7mining Expense Reimbursement 00778 County of Orange-Auditor Conlroller 3.600.00 Administrative Processing Fee for Supplemental Sewer Fee Adustments/Cancellations H:bapMaFxCEL41sIIg4P6HNlElCltlme Pan Rapm KKM)X bon Pan Repon-0331C1xY EXHIBITS Medusa Page 7 of 9 411w n Claims Paid From 03116/04 to 0313IM4 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 60779 Orange County Sanitation District 2.012.15 Petty Cash Relmb. 60780 State Board of Equalization 350.00 Annexation Fee 60781 William Kitt 918.59 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 60782 Air Products&Chemicals 26.294.06 O&M Agreement Oxy Gen Sys MO 84"9 60783 California Sall Products 34.236.61 Residuals Removal MO 3.29-95 60784 Orange County Water Disbict 67,840.33 GAP Water Use 60785 Airgas Safety,Inc 1,015.84 Safety Supplies 60786 Bell Pipe&Supply Co. 8.77 Mechanical Supplies 60787 Black&Veatch Cawporatlon 3.412.34 Engineering Services-Hydrogen Peroxide Facility Modifications 60788 Charles P.CwMey Co. 483.99 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 60789 Canpressor Components Of California 1.241.76 Coil Cleaning&Testing 60790 Consolidated Elect.Dlst tutom,Inc. 425.12 Electrical Supplies 60791 Consumers Pipe&Supply Co. 32.67 Plumbing Supplies 60792 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 60793 CWFA 2002 Annual Conference 150.00 Air Quality It Special Projects Meeting Registration-Calif.Water Quality Env.Assoc. 60794 Department of Child Support Services 188.50 Wage Garnishment 60795 Employee Benefits Specialists.Inc 9,609.35 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical&Dependent Care 60796 Environmental Management Consulting 1.890.00 Professional Services-Data Analysis&Reporting 60797 Five Star Metals,Inc. 330.54 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60798 Fluor Enterprises.Inc 16,783.45 Engineering Services SP-81 60799 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 24.271.60 Long-Tenn&Short-Term Disability Ins.Premium 60800 Franchise Tax Board 100.00 Wage Garnishment 60801 Fys Electronics 27.11 Computer Supplies 60802 GarraB-Callahan Company 3,846.15 Chemicals 60803 The Holman Group 931.50 Employee Assistance Program Premium 60804 Internal Revenue Service 300.00 Wage Garnishment 60805 Internal Revenue Service 200.00 Wage Gamishment 60806 Kings County Tax Collector 11,395.20 Property Taxes 60807 MarVac Electronics 11.63 Electrical Supplies 60808 McMahan Business Interiors 2,655.87 Workstation Modifications&Lateral Files 6DB09 McMaster-Can Supply Co. 1,106.53 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60810 Measurement Control Systems,Inc. 6.025.48 Electrical Supplies 60811 National Bond&Trost 2,537.75 U.S.Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 60812 Operation Technology,Inc. Z241.00 Project Management Office Training Registration 60813 Orange Fluid System Technologies,Inc. 1,150.29 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60814 OCEA 589.73 Dues Deduction 60815 Parker Hannifin Corporation 412.25 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60816 Public Resources Advisory Group 7.500.00 Financial Advisory Services 60817 City of Seal Beach Finance Dept. 107.84 Water Use 60818 Sl luck Sales&Engineering 854.15 Mechanical Parts&Supplies 60819 SoBCholce Corp. 488.28 Soitvrare 60820 Summit Steel 4,294.52 Metal 60821 SBC 56.62 Telephone Services 60822 Thompson Industrial Supply,Inc. 91.81 Aid Water Hoses 60a23 Times Community News 50.00 Notices&Ads 60824 The Unisawres Corporation 8,171.98 Stationery&Office Supplies 60825 United Parcel Service 1.007.33 Parcel Services 60826 United Slates Postal Service 750.00 P.O.Box Fee HWepnriM KCEL dlav] SllVsc.lrna Pak Reponwa-Nt ft vent Rgon-ovla 4e Page&p18 EXHIBITS Claims Paid From OD/16I04 to 03/31/04 Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 60827 United Way 255.00 Employee Contributions W828 Vertex,Inc. 4,D40.63 Software-Vertex Payroll Tax 60829 West GmupNVesl Publishing CO. 378.00 Publication SD830 WEF 139.00 Membership-Water Environment Federation 60831 William W.Heath 2,236.84 Stale Dated Payroll Check Replacement W832 Eunice L.Kialah 25.00 Payroll Adjustment 60833 Mark Mutz 491.90 Lost Payroll Check Replacement 6D834 John P.Finas 520.93 Vehicle Damage Claim 60835 Local Agency Formation Commission 1,150.00 Annexation Fees 60836 Robed J.Lung 8 Assoc. 1,675.94 Construction-J-90 Total Accounts Payable-Warrants S 9,201,766.25 Pendell Disbursements 33400-33538 Employee Paychecks S 211,301.77 Biweekly Payroll 03/17/04 33539.33634 Employee Paychecks 163,351.82 Biweekly Payroll 03/31/04 95610-96129 Direct Deposit Statements 967,697.00 Biweekly Payroll 3/17M4 96130-96643 Direct Deposit Statement 1,015,993.38 Biweekly Payroll 03/31/04 Total Payroll Disbursements S 2,358,343.97 Wire Transfer Payments U.S.Bank S 39,189.54 March Interest Payment on 2000 Series A 6 B Certificates of Participation OCSD Payroll Taxes 8 Conblbutions S 785,020.16 Biweekly Payroll 03/17/D4 DCSD Payroll Taxes 8 Contributions S 676, 02.292.78 byweekiy Payroll 03/31/04 Total Wire Transfer Payments S 1.500,548 Total Claims Paid 03/16/04-03131104 S 13,060,612.70 KV a,nrm\E%CEL Ela@NNPSHARDOaims Pale R¢pHgl-of\CUims Pab Reyl-01010u as EXHIBIT B r 10% Page 9 of 9 NlY BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date I To Bd.of Dir. 4/24/04 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 9(a) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, D.Env., Director of Technical Services Originator: Mark Kawamoto, Engineer SUBJECT: Authorization to Accept Proposition 13 Grant Funds GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 04-11, Accepting The Proposition 13 Watershed Protection Grant for Phase II of the Fat, Oil and Great Control Study from the State Water Resources Control Board, for Phase II of the FOG Control Study, in an amount not to exceed $250,000; and, (2) Authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board for said Proposition 13 Watershed Protection Grant, and to comply fully with the terms and conditions specified in the grant agreement, in a form approved by General Counsel. SUMMARY • In April 2002, the California Regional Water Control Board, Santa Ana Region issued Order No. RB-2002-0014, General Waste Discharge Requirements, requiring Orange County cities and wastewater treatment agencies under the jurisdiction of the RWQCB to monitor and control SSOs and to prepare and implement FOG Control Programs by December 30, 2004. The District was named as one of the co- permittees to the Order and also designated as facilitator for the regional effort to coordinate development of the programs and implementation. • In May 2003, OCSD, on behalf of the co-permittees, applied to the State Water Resources Control Board for a Proposition 13 Watershed Protection Program Grant to help fund Phase II of the FOG Control Study. • In February 2004, OCSD was notified that it is eligible for such a grant in an amount not to exceed $250,000. As a condition for receiving the grant, OCSD must enter into an agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board and comply with all the requirements detailed therein. • Although the grant is for the next fiscal year, to expedite making the funds available to the co-permittees the SW RCB is funding the grant from this fiscal year's budget. The remaining document necessary to make this happen is a Board resolution whereby the Board formally accepts the grant and the terms and conditions specified in the grant agreement, a draft copy of which is attached. M PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS April 2002: Board of Directors approved awarding a contract to conduct Phase I of the FOG Control Study. July 2003: Board of Directors approved awarding a contract to conduct Phase 11 of the FOG Control Study. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In April 2002, the California Regional Water Control Board, Santa Ana Region (RWQCB) issued Order No. R8-2002-0014, General Waste Discharge Requirements (W DR), requiring Orange County cities and wastewater treatment agencies under the jurisdiction of the RWQCB to monitor and control SSOs and to prepare and implement a FOG Control Programs by December 30, 2004. The District was named as one of the co-permittees, and also designated as facilitator for the regional effort to coordinate development of the programs and implementation. Following the promulgation of the Order, the co-permittees determined that the interests of the county would best be met by conducting a comprehensive FOG Control Study to establish the technical, administrative, and ordinance building blocks of such a program, while providing a regional, practical, and equitable approach throughout Orange County. Staff and co-permittees agreed to conduct the study in two phases. Phase I ended in May 2003 and resulted in a draft Phase I report, which identified 12 programmatic building blocks for an effective FOG control program. The study also identified regional issues and three newer technologies that must be addressed in Phase II of the FOG Control Study before the report can be finalized. In July 2003, the Board authorized staff to enter into an agreement to conduct Phase 11 of the study and to enter into agreements with the other co-permittees to fund the study by using a fair-share formula based on population. Page 2 ALTERNATIVES Staff has appraised, as an alternative to accepting the grant, funding the study by the co-permittees' contributions alone. Under this scenario, the District would operate in a manner similar to that used for Phase I. Although this process is more streamlined, the fair-share contribution by each co-permittee would be significantly less by accepting the grant; however, by accepting the grant OCSD would incur additional administrative requirements to comply with the terms and conditions of the grant agreement, such as submitting to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the State Water Resources Control Board a Quality Assurance Project Plan, a Monitoring Plan, monthly/quarterly progress reports, semi-annual expenditure/invoice projections, and a Project Assessment and Evaluation Plan. Also as a requirement of the agreement, the District must maintain records related to the grant and make them available for audit for a minimum of 36 years. Staff estimates that this additional effort will cost $35,000 over the next two years. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS • Proposed Resolution No. OCSD 04-11 • Draft Grant Agreement between the State Water Resources Control Board and OCSD Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 04-11 ACCEPTING THE PROPOSITION 13 WATERSHED PROTECTION GRANT FOR PHASE II OF THE FAT, OIL AND GREASE CONTROL STUDY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ACCEPTING THE PROPOSITION 13 WATERSHED PROTECTION GRANT FOR PHASE II OF THE FAT, OIL AND GREASE CONTROL STUDY WHEREAS, in April, 2002, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region ("RWQCB") issued Order No. R8-2002-0014, General Waste Discharge Requirements, requiring Orange County Cities and Wastewater Treatment Agencies under the jurisdiction of the RWQCB to monitor and control Sanitary Sewer Overflows and to prepare and implement Fat, Oil and Grease ("FOG') Programs by December 30, 2004. Orange County Sanitation District was named as one of the co-permittees to the Order, and was also designated as Facilitator for the regional effort to coordinate development of the Programs and implementation; and, WHEREAS, the co-permittees of the Order determined that their interests would best be met by conducting a comprehensive FOG Control Study to establish the technical, administrative, and ordinance building blocks of such a Program, while providing a regional, practical, and equitable approach throughout Orange County. The co-permittees agreed to conduct the Study in two Phases; and, WHEREAS, in April, 2002, the Board of Directors approved a contract to conduct Phase I of the FOG Control Study. In general, the Study is evaluating existing programs and technologies to determine the critical elements necessary for implementing an effective FOG Control Program; and, WHEREAS, in May, 2003, Phase I ended and resulted in a Draft Phase I Report, which identified 12 programmatic building blocks for an effective FOG Control Program. The Study also identified regional issues and 3 newer technologies that must be addressed in Phase II of the FOG Control Study before the Report can be finalized; and, WHEREAS, in May, 2003, the District, on behalf of the co-permittees, applied to the State Water Resources Control Board ("SW RCB")for a Proposition 13 Watershed Protection Grant to help fund Phase 11 of the FOG Control Study; and, f WHEREAS, in July, 2003, the Board of Directors authorized Staff to enter into an Agreement to conduct Phase II of the Study and to enter into Agreements with the other co-permittees to fund the Study by using a fair share formula based on population; and, WHEREAS, in February, 2004, the District was notified that it is eligible for a Proposition 13 Watershed Protection Grant in an amount not to exceed $250,000. As a condition for receiving the grant, the District must enter into an Agreement with the SW RCB and comply with all the requirements detailed therein; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors is willing to accept the Proposition 13 Watershed Protection Grant, and agrees to comply with all the terms and conditions of the Grant Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the District accepts the Proposition 13 Watershed Protection Grant on behalf of the W DR co-permittees. Section 2: That the Proposition 13 Watershed Protection Grant will be used for funding Phase 11 of the FOG Control Study in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the Grant Agreement. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 28, 2004. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary 2 J � J- PROPOSITION 13 WATERSHED PROTECTION GRANT PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AGREEMENT NO.[ ] This Grant Agreement is made between the State of California acting by and through the State Water Resources Control Board, hereafter referred to as the"SWRCB",and Orange County Sanitation District, a county, hereafter referred to as the"Grantee". WHEREAS: 1. The following provisions authorize the SWRCB to enter into this type of Grant Agreement:WC§79079(Pr 13 WPP); 2. The Grantee has applied for a grant and has been determined by the SWRCB to be eligible for a grant pursuant to applicable State laws and regulations; and 3. The SWRCB,pursuant to the [insert SWRCB Resolution No.,_,approved on_or series of blanket resolutions and preliminary funding commitments], has authorized grant funding for the Project hereafter described. NOW.THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: 1. The Project generally consists of Phase II of the study evaluating existing program and technologies to determine the critical elements necessary for implementing an effective fats, oils, and grease (FOG)control program. 2. The Project Representatives during the tens of this Agreement will be: State Water Resources Control Board Grantee: Name: Ken Theisen, Grant Manager Name: Mark Kawamoto, Project Director Address: 3737 Main Street, Suite 500, Riverside, Address: 108"Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,CA CA 92501-3339 92728 Phone: 909 320.2028 Phone: 714 593-7424 Fax: Fau: 714 962-6957 e-mati: e-mail: kawamoto0ociscl.com Direct all inquiries to: State Water Resources Control Board Grantee: SectiorVtlnit: Division of Financial Assistance Section(Unit: Attention: Pam Nichols, P ram Analyst Attention: Grerd Contact Address: 1001 I Street, 14 Floor, Sacramento,CA Address: 95814 Phone: 916 341-5909 Phone: Fax: 916 341-5296 Fax: e-mail: nich Qswrob.ca. ov a-mail: aa � � The parties may change their Project Representative upon written notice to the other party. 3. Incorporation of Documents. This Agreement incorporates the following documents: 3.1 Exhibit A, Scope of Work; 3.2 Exhibit B, Budget Detail and Payment Provisions; 3.3 Exhibit C, SWRCB General Conditions;and 3.4 Exhibit D, Grant Program Terms and Conditions. 4. The Grantee accepts and agrees to comply with all terms, provisions,conditions, and commitments of this Agreement, including all incorporated documents,and to fulfill all assurances,declaration, representations, and commitments made by the Grantee in its application, accompanying documents,and communications filed in support of its request for grant funding. Grantee shall comply with and require its contractors and subcontractors to comply with all applicable laws, policies and regulations. 5. The term of the Agreement shall begin on and continue for thirty-six(36)years unless otherwise terminated or amended as provided in the Agreement. HOWEVER, ALL WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED BY March 1, 2006. IN WITNESS THEREOF,the parties have executed this Agreement on the dates set forth below. By. By: Grantee Signature State of California Signature State Water Resources Control Board Chief, Division of Administrative Services Grantee Typed/Printed Name SW RCB Typed/Printed Name Title and Date Date 07 11� .r J EXHIBIT A-SCOPE OF WORK 1. Contracts and Permits. 1.1 Grantee shall document steps taken in soliciting and awarding any contracts to perform grant work and submit such documentation to the Grant Manager for review prior to contract award. Grantee shall provide Grant Manager with a copy of the awarded contract. Grantee shall document all contractor activities and expenditures in progress reports. 1.2 No work that is subject to California Environmental Quality Act(CEOA)or National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) may proceed under this Agreement until documents that satisfy the CEQA/NEPA process are received by the Grant Manager. 1.3 Grantee shall secure all required permits for project work. No work that is subject to permitting may proceed under this Agreement until documents that satisfy the permitting process(es) are received by the Grant Manager. 2. Quality Assurance Project Plan and Monitoring Plan 2.1 Prepare and maintain a Quality Assurance Project Plan(QAPP). The QAPP must be approved by the RWQCB or SWRCB's QA Officer prior to implementation of any sampling or monitoring activities. No monitoring may occur prior to QAPP approval. Any costs related to monitoring data collected prior to and not supported by the approved QAPP will not be reimbursed. 2.2 Prepare and maintain a Monitoring Plan (describe the types of constituents to be monitored and the frequency/schedule for the monitoring activities). The Monitoring Plan shall be approved by the Grant Manager prior to implementation of any sampling or monitoring activities. No monitoring may occur prior to Monitoring Plan approval. The Grant Manager must approve any changes to the Monitoring Plan prior to implementation. 3. Work To Be Performed: Item 1: Develop Field-Testing Work Plan • Develop the overall work plan for field-testing three(3)technologies(automatic grease traps, interceptor monitoring devices,and biological additives)to gather sufficient data for determining whether these technologies are truly effective in controlling FOG discharges. These technologies were previously identified in the FOG Control Study Phase I Report as having insufficient scientific data to decide whether they should be included as options in an effective FOG Control Program. Item 2: Conduct Field-Testing of the Technologies • Implement the testing of the three (3)technologies based on the development of the Field-Testing Work Plan and will include the installation,testing, and removal of the three (3)technologies from the test site. • Data collected will be the result of analyzing influent and effluent wastewater samples and measuring PH. temperature, and the water,grease,and solids levels. The exact data and frequency of collection will be outlined in the QAPP/Monitoring Plan. Item 3: Undertake Compilation and Produce Project Reports (Interim and Final) • Ensure that the data collected during the field-testing is organized and analyzed to answer the question of whether any of these technologies are essential for a FOG Control Program and are effective in minimizing FOG-related sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). fi`" 631 ( n EXHIBIT B—BUDGET AND REPORTING PROVISIONS 1. Invoicing 1.1 Invoices shall include the Agreement Number. The original invoice shall be submitted to the SWRCB's Program Analyst and three(3)copies to the SW RCB's Grant Manager not more frequently than monthly in arrears to: Pam Nichols, Program Analyst Ken Theisen,Grant Manager State Water Resources Control Board Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Division of Financial Assistance 3737 Main Street, Suite 500 1001 1 Street, 10 Floor Riverside, CA 92501-3339 Sacramento, CA 95814 1.2 Payment of any invoice will be made only after receipt of a complete, adequately supported, properly documented and accurately addressed invoice or payment request. Failure to use the address exactly as provided above may result in return of the invoice or payment request to the Grantee. Payment shall be deemed complete upon deposit of the payment, properly addressed, postage prepaid, in the United States mail. Al invoices must be approved by the SW RCB's Grant Manager. 1.3 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, no disbursement shall be required at any time or in any manner which is in violation of or in conflict with federal or state laws, rules,or regulation, or which may require any rebates to the Federal Government,or any loss of tax-free status on state bonds,pursuant to any Federal statute or regulation. 1.4 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,the Grantee agrees that the SW RCB may retain an amount equal to ten percent(10%)of the grant amount specified in this Agreement until completion of the Project to the reasonable satisfaction of the SWRCB. Any retained amounts due to the Grantee will be promptly disbursed to the Grantee, without interest,upon completion of the Project. 1.5 The invoice shall contain the following information: 1.5.1 The word`INVOICE"should appear in a prominent location at the top of page(s); 1.5.2 Printed name of the Grantee; 1.5.3 Business address of the Grantee, including P.O. Box,City, State, and Zip Code; 1.5.4 The date of the invoice; 1.5.5 The number of the Agreement upon which the claim is based; and 1.5.6 An itemized account of the work for which the SW RCB is being billed; 1.5.6.1 The time period covered by the invoice, i.e.,the term'from"and"to"; 1.5.6.2 A brief description of the work performed; 1.5.6.3 The method of computing the amount due. On cost reimbursable agreements, Invoices must be itemized based on the categories specified In the Budget. The amount claimed for salaries/wages/consultant fees must also be explained;i.e.,hours or days worked times the hourly or daily rate=the total amount claimed; 1.5.6.4 The total amount due;this should be in a prominent location in the lower right-hand portion of the last page and clearly distinguished from other figures or computations appearing on the invoice;the total amount due shall include all costs incurred by the Grantee under the terms of this Agreement; and 1.5.7 Original signature of Grantee (not required of established firms or entities using preprinted letterhead invoices). 2. Budget Contingency Clause lr7 The maximum amount to be encumbered under this Agreement for the 2003-04 fiscal year ending June 30, 2006 shall not exceed two hundred fifty thousand ($250,000). If the Budget Act of the current year and/or any subsequent years covered under this Agreement does not appropriate sufficient funds for the program,this Agreement shall be of no force and effect. This provision shall be construed as a condition precedent to the obligation of the SW RCB to make any payments under this Agreement. In this event,the State shall have no liability to pay any funds whatsoever to Grantee or to furnish any other considerations under this Agreement and Grantee shall not be obligated to perform any provisions of this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to provide the Grantee with a right of priority for payment over any other Grantee. If funding for any fiscal year is reduced or deleted by the Budget Act for purposes of this program,the State shall have the option to either cancel this Agreement with no liability occurring to the State, or offer an agreement amendment to Grantee to reflect the reduced amount. 3. LINE ITEM BUDGET Pr? oo13 MATCH TOTAL Personnel Services(includes benefits) $23,000 $19,704 $42,704 Class Hours Wage/Hour Total Grant Coordinator 200 $30.94 $8,230' Project Director 600 $37.70 $30,085' Management 60 $55.00 4,389' ('Includes an Overhead Factor= 1,33) Professional and Consultant Services $227,000 $30,000 $257,000 Laboratory Services $12,000 $ $12,000 Field Testing Work Plan $8,000 $10,000 $18,000 Filed Work $172,000 $ $185,000 Interagency Coordination $10,000 $ $10.000 Data Compilation and Reports $25,000 $20,000 $45,000 TOTAL $250,000 $49,704 $299,704 4. Budget Line Item Flexibility 4.1 Line Item Adjustment(s). Subject to the prior review and approval of the SW RCB's Grant Manager, adjustments between existing line item(s)may be used to defray allowable direct costs up to fifteen percent (15%) of the Agreement total including any amendment(s)thereto. Line item adjustments in excess of fifteen percent(15%)shall require a formal agreement amendment. 4.2 Procedure to Request an Adjustment.The Grantee may submit a request for an adjustment in writing to the SW RCB. Such adjustment may not increase or decrease the total grant amount allocated per fiscal year. The Grantee shall submit a copy of the original Agreement Budget sheet reflecting the requested changes. Changes shall be noted by striking the original amount(s)followed with revised change(s) in bold and underlined. Budget adjustments deleting a budget line item or adding a new budget line item requires a formal amendment and are not permissible under this provision. The SW RCB may also propose adjustments to the budget. 5. OAPP/CEOA/NEPA/Permit Payment. Grantee shall provide to the SWRCB's Grant Manager a certification form (to be provided by the SW RCB)certifying that the OAPP/CEOA/NEPA/PERMIT documents have been Jedr received by the Grant Manager. Payment for this activity shall not be made to Grantee until the certification form is received by the SWRCB's Grant Manager. 6. Reports. 6.1 Grantee shall submit quarterly/monthly progress reports to the SWRCB's Grant Manager by the tenth (1 Oh) of the month following the end of the calendar quarter(March,June, September,and December). The progress reports shall describe activities undertaken and accomplishments during the quarter/month, milestones achieved,and any problems encountered in the performance of the work under this Agreement. 6.2 Every six(6)months during the work performed under the Scope of Work of this Agreement, the Grantee shall develop and submit to their assigned SWRCB's Program Analyst expenditurelinvoice projections to enable funding to be available for payment of invoices. 6.3 Grantee shall complete a one (1)page Grant Summary Form htto://www.swrcb.ca.aov/nps/docs/consummary.doc within three (3) months of the Agreement execution. 6.4 At the completion of this project,the Grantee shall complete and submit electronically a Natural Resource Projects Inventory(NRPI)project survey forth htto://www.ice.ucdavis.edu/nmi forms/default.aso. A hard copy shall be submitted to the Program Analyst prior to final payment. 6.5 Grantee shall submit to the Grant Manager a Project Assessment and Evaluation Plan that addresses all requirements of the monitoring and reporting plan described in Exhibit D. 6.6 The Grantee agrees to expeditiously provide, during work on the Project and for a reasonable period of time thereafter, such reports,data, information, and certifications as may be reasonably required by the SW RCB. 7. Payment of Project Costs. The Grantee agrees that it will provide for payment of its full share of Project costs and that all costs connected with the Project will be paid by the Grantee on a timely basis. r EXHIBIT C SWRCB GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. AMENDMENT: No amendment or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties and approved as required. No oral understanding or Agreement not Incorporated in the Agreement is binding on any of the parties. 2. APPROVAL: The Grantee will not proceed with any work on the Project until authorized in writing by the SWRCB. 3. ASSIGNMENT: This grant is not assignable by the Grantee, either in whole or in part, without the consent of the SWRCB. 4. AUDIT: Grantee agrees that the awarding department, the Bureau of State Audits, or their designated representative shall have the right to review and to copy any records and supporting documentation pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. Grantee agrees to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of thirty-six (36) years after final payment, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated. Grantee agrees to allow the auditor(s) access to such records during normal business hours and to allow interviews of any employees who might reasonably have information related to such records. Further, Grantee agrees to include a similar right of the State to audit records and interview staff in any contract related to performance of this Agreement. 5. BONDING: Where contractors are used,construction shall not begin until each such contractor has furnished a performance bond in favor of the Grantee in the following amounts: faithful performance (100%) of contract value; labor and materials (100%) of contract value. This requirement shall not apply to any contract for less than$20,000. 6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW, REGULATIONS, ETC.: The Grantee agrees that it will, at all times, comply with and require Its contractors and subcontractors to comply with all applicable federal and state laws, rules, guidelines, regulations, and requirements. Without limitation of the foregoing, the Grantee agrees that, to the extent applicable, the Grantee will comply with the provisions of the adopted environmental mitigation plan for the term of this Agreement. 7. COMPUTER SOFTWARE: The Grantee certifies that it has appropriate systems and controls in place to ensure that state funds will not be used in the performance of this Agreement for the acquisition, operation or maintenance of computer software in violation of copyright laws. 8. DAMAGES FOR BREACH AFFECTING TAX EXEMPT STATUS: In the event that any breach of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the Grantee shall result in the loss of tax exempt status for any state bonds,or If such breach shall result in an obligation on the part of the State to reimburse the federal government by reason of any arbitrage profits, the Grantee shall immediately reimburse the state in an amount equal to any damages paid by or loss incurred by the state due to such breach. 9. DISPUTES: Grantee shall continue with the responsibilities under this Agreement during any dispute. Any dispute arising under this Agreement which is not otherwise disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Chief of the Division of Financial Assistance (Division), or his or her authorized representative. The decision shall be reduced to writing and a copy thereof furnished to the Grantee and to the SWRCB's Executive Director. The decision of the Division shall be final and conclusive unless, within thirty (30) calendar days after mailing of the Division decision to the Grantee,the Grantee malls or otherwise furnishes a written appeal of the decision to the SWRCB's Executive Director. The decision of the SWRCB's Executive Director shall be final and conclusive unless determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to have been fraudulent, or capricious, or arbitrary,or so grossly erroneous as necessarily to imply bad faith, or not supported by substantial evidence. In connection with any appeal under this clause, the Grantee shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard and to offer evidence in support of its appeal. Pending final decision of a dispute hereunder, the Grantee shall continue to fulfill and comply with all the terms, provisions, commitments, and requirements of this Agreement. This clause does not preclude consideration of legal questions, provided that nothing herein shall be construed to make final the decision of the SWRCB,or any official or representative thereof,on any question of law. 10. FISCAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND ACCOUNTING STANDARDS: The Grantee agrees that, at a minimum, its fiscal control and accounting procedures will be sufficient to permit tracing of grant funds to a level of expenditure adequate to establish that such funds have not been used in violation of state law or this Ir To7 ; Agreement. The Grantee further agrees that it will maintain separate Project accounts in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. 11. GOVERNING LAW:This gram is governed by and shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 12. GRANT MODIFICATIONS: The SWRCB may, at any time, without notice to any sureties, by written order designated or indicated to be a "gram modification", make any change in Exhibit A, for the work to be performed under this Agreement so long as the modified work is within the general scope of work called for by this Agreement, including but not limited to changes in the specifications or in the method, manner, or time of performance of work. If the Grantee intends to dispute the change,the Grantee must,within ten (10)days after receipt of a written "grant modification", submit to the SWRCB a written statement setting forth the disagreement with the change. 13. INCOME RESTRICTIONS: The Grantee agrees that any refunds, rebates, credits,or other amounts (including any interest thereon)accruing to or received by the Grantee under this Agreement shall be paid by the Grantee to the State, to the extent that they are properly allocable to costs for which the Grantee has been reimbursed by the State under this Agreement. 14. INSPECTION: Throughout the term of this Agreement, the SWRCB shall have the right to inspect the project area to ascertain compliance with this Agreement. 15. INSURANCE: Throughout the term of this Agreement, the Grantee shall provide and maintain insurance against fire, vandalism and other loss, damage, or destruction of the facilities or structures constructed pursuant to this Agreement, if any. This insurance shall be issued by a company or companies admitted to transact business in the State of California. The insurance policy shall contain an endorsement specifying that the policy will not be cancelled or reduced in coverage without thirty days'prior written notice to the SWRCB. 16. NONDISCRIMINATION: During the performance of this Agreement, the Grantee and its contractors shall not unlawfully discriminate against, harass, or allow harassment against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, disability, medical condition, marital status, age (over 40) or denial of family-care leave, medical-care leave, or pregnancy-disability leave. The Grantee and its contractors shall ensure that the evaluation and treatment of their employees and applicants for employment are free of such discrimination and harassment. 17. NOTICE: The Grantee shall promptly notify the SWRCB of events or proposed changes that could affect the scope, budget, or work performed under this Agreement. The Grantee agrees that no substantial change in the scope of the Project will be undertaken until written notice of the proposed change has been provided to the SWRCB, and the SWRCB has given written approval for such change. The Grantee shall notify the SWRCB at least ten (10) working days prior to any public or media event publicizing the accomplishments and/or results of this Agreement and provide the opportunity for attendance and participation by SWRCB's representatives.The Grantee shall promptly notify the SWRCB in writing of completion of work on the Project. 18. PERMITS, CONTRACTING, WAIVER, REMEDIES AND DEBARMENT: The Grantee shall procure all permits and licenses necessary to accomplish the work contemplated in this Agreement, pay all charges and fees, and give all notices necessary and incidental to the due and lawful prosecution of the work. Any contractors, outside associates, or consultants required by the Grantee in connection with the services covered by this Agreement shall be limited to such individuals or fines as were specifically identified and agreed to during negotiations for this Agreement, or as are specifically authorized by the SWRCB's Project Representative during the performance of this Agreement. Any substitutions in, or additions to, such contractors, associates, or consultants, shall be subject to the prior written approval of the SWRCB's Project Representative. Any waiver of rights with respect to a default or other matter arising under the Agreement at any time by either party shall not be considered a waiver of rights with respect to any other default or matter. Any rights and remedies of the State provided for in this Agreement am in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law. The Grantee shall not contract with any party who is debarred or suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs under Executive Order 12549, "Debament and Suspension". The Grantee shall not contract with any individual or organization on USEPA's List of Violating Facilities. (40 CFR, Part 31.35, Gov. Code 4477) The Grantee certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: J rT a. Are not presently tlebarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded by any federal department or grantee; b. Have not within a three-year period preceding this Agreement been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery,falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; c. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal, state or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (b) of this certification; and d. Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (federal,state or local)terminated for cause or default. 19. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE: The Grantee shall maintain and operate the facility and structures constructed or improved as part of the project throughout the term of this Agreement, consistent with the purposes for which this grant was made. The Grantee assumes all operations and maintenance costs of the facilities and structures; the SWRCB shall not be liable for any cost of such maintenance, management or operation. The Grantee may be excused from operations and maintenance only upon the written approval of the Grant Manager. For purposes of this Agreement, "operation costs"include direct costs incurred for material and labor needed for operations, utilities, insurance, and similar expenses. "Maintenance costs" include ordinary repairs and replacements of a recurring nature necessary to prolong the fife of capital assets and basic structures, and the expenditure of funds necessary to replace or reconstruct capital assets or basic structures. 20. PREVAILING WAGES AND LABOR COMPLIANCE: If applicable, the Grantee agrees to be bound by all the provisions of State Labor Code Section 1771 regarding prevailing wages. If applicable, the Grantee shall monitor all agreements subject to reimbursement from this Agreement to assure that the prevailing wage provisions of State Labor Code Section 1771 are being met. The Grantee agrees to fulfill its responsibilities under Section 1771.8 of the Labor Code, where applicable. 21. PROFESSIONALS: The Grantee agrees that only licensed professionals will be used to perform services under this Agreement where such services are called for. 22. RECORDS: Without limitation of the requirement to maintain Project accounts in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,the Grantee agrees to: a. Establish an official file for the Project which shall adequately document all significant actions relative to the Project; b. Establish separate accounts which will adequately and accurately depict all amounts received and expended on this Project, including all grant funds received under this Agreement; c. Establish separate accounts which will adequately depict all income received which is attributable to the Project,especially including any income attributable to grant funds disbursed under this Agreement; d. Establish an accounting system which will adequately depict final total costs of the Project, including both direct and indirect costs; e. Establish such accounts and maintain such records as may be necessary for the state to fulfill federal reporting requirements, including any and all reporting requirements under federal tax statutes or regulations;and I. If Force Account is used by the Grantee for any phase of the Project, establish an account that documents all employee hours,and associated tasks charged to the Project per employee. 23. RIGHTS IN DATA: The Grantee agrees that all data, plans, drawings, specifications, reports, computer programs, operating manuals, notes, and other written or graphic work produced in the performance of this Agreement are subject to the rights of the State as set forth in this section. The State shall have the right to reproduce, publish, and use all such work,or any part thereof, in any manner and for any purposes whatsoever and to authorize others to do so. If any such work is copyrightable, the Grantee may copyright the same, except that, as to any work which is copyrighted by the Grantee, the State reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, and use such work, or any part thereof, and to authorize others to do so. The Grantee shall not utilize the materials for any profit-making venture or sell or grant rights to a third party who intends to do so. TR ; 24. STATE REVIEWS AND INDEMNIFICATION: The parties agree that review or approval of Project applications, documents, permits, plans and specifications or other Project information by the SWRCB is for administrative purposes only and does not relieve the Grantee of Its responsibility to properly plan,design,construct, operate, maintain, implement, or otherwise carry out the Project. To the extent permitted by law, the Grantee agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the SWRCB and the State against any loss or liability arising out of any claim or action brought against the SWRCB and/or the State from and against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities or expenses, of every conceivable kind, character and nature whatsoever arising out of, resulting from, or in any way connected with (1) the Project or the conditions, occupancy, use, possession, conduct or management of, work done in or about, or the planning, design, acquisition, installation or construction, of the Project or any part thereof; (2) the carrying out of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any related document; (3) any violation of any applicable law, rule or regulation, any environmental law (including, without limitation, the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the California Hazardous Substance Account Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Clean Air Act, the California Hazardous Waste Control Law and California Water Code Section 13304, and any successors to said laws), rule or regulation or the release of any toxic substance on or near the System; or(4) any untrue statement or alleged untrue statement of any material fact or omission or alleged omission to state a material fact necessary to make the statements required to be stated therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading with respect to any information provided by the Grantee for use in any disclosure document utilized In connection with any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Grantee agrees to pay and discharge any judgment or award entered or made against the SWRCB and/or the State with respect to any such claim or action, and any settlement, compromise or other voluntary resolution.The provisions of this section shall survive the term of this Agreement. 25. SWRCB ACTION, COSTS, AND ATTORNEY FEES: The Grantee agrees that any remedy provided in this Agreement is in addition to and not in derogation of any other legal or equitable remedy available to the SWRCB as a result of breach of this Agreement by the Grantee, whether such breach occurs before or after completion of the Project, and exercise of any remedy provided by this Agreement by the SWRCB shall not preclude the SWRCB from pursuing any legal remedy or right which would otherwise be available. In the event of litigation between the parties hereto arising from this Agreement,it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be entitled to such reasonable costs and/or attorney fees as may be ordered by the court entertaining such litigation. 26. TERMINATION, IMMEDIATE REPAYMENT, INTEREST: This Grant Agreement may be terminated by written nottoe at any of this Grant Agreement time prior to completion of the Project, at the option of the SWRCB, upon violation by the Grantee of any material provision after such violation has been called to the attention of the Grantee and after failure of the Grantee to bring itself into compliance with the provisions of this Agreement within a reasonable time as established by the SWRCB. In the event of such termination, the Grantee agrees, upon demand, to immediately repay to the SWRCB an amount equal to the amount of grant funds disbursed to the Grantee prior to such termination. In the event of termination, interest shall accrue on all amounts due at the highest legal rate of interest from the date that notice of termination is mailed to the Grantee to the date of full repayment by the Grantee. 27. TIMELINESS:Time is of the essence in this Agreement. 28. TRAVEL AND PER DIEM: Any reimbursement for necessary travel and per diem shall be at rates not to exceed those amounts paid to the State's represented employees under collective bargaining Agreements currently in effect. No travel outside the State of California shall be reimbursed unless prior written authorization is obtained from the SWRCB. 29. UNENFORCEABLE PROVISION: In the event that any provision of this Agreement is unenforceable or held to be unenforceable, then the parties agree that all other provisions of this Agreement shall continue to have full force and effect and shall not be affected thereby. 30. VENUE:The SWRCB and the Grantee hereby agree that any action arising out of this Agreement shall be filed and maintained in the Superior Court in and for the County of Sacramento, California, or in the United States District Court in and for the Eastern District of California. 31. WITHHOLDING OF GRANT DISBURSEMENTS: The SWRCB may withhold all or any portion of the grant funds provided for by this Agreement in the event that the Grantee has materially violated, or threatens to n I�r; 7 7 c materially violate, any term, provision, condition, or commitment of this Agreement; or the Grantee fails to maintain reasonable progress toward completion of the Project. P` r EXHIBIT D Grant Program Terms&Conditions 1. This project is to develop local watershed management plans or to Implement project consistent with local watershed management and regional water quality control plans, as such terms are defined in Water Code§79078. 2. The Grantee certifies that it has adequate legal authority to manage the grant money. 3. The Grantee certifies that it is a member of local watershed group,as defined in Water Code§79078. 4. The Grantee certifies that Its project is designed to withstand substantial flooding, if a watershed Improvement project. 5. Notwithstanding Exhibit A,the Grantee agrees to submit a monitoring and reporting plan that will do all of the following: a. describes baseline water quality of the water body impacted b. describes manner in which proposed watershed restoration activities are implemented c. determines effectiveness of watershed restoration activities in preventing or reducing pollution d. determines,to extent feasible, changes In pattern of flow in affected streams, Including reduction of flood flows and increases in spring,summer,and fall flows that result from the implementation of the project determines,to the extent feasible, economic benefits resulting from changes determined pursuant to (c) or (d)above. 6. The Grantee shall inform the SWRCB with regard to necessary public agency approvals, entitlements, and permits that may be necessary to implement the project. The Grantee shall certify to the SWRCB,at the appropriate time,that it has obtained those approvals,entitlements, and permits. 7. The Grantee shall notify, in writing,adjoining landowners of its request for this grant and the scope of the project for which the grant funding is requested. Upon completion of the notification required under this section, the Grantee shall Inform the SWRCB that the notification has occurred. 8. The Grantee hereby certifies that it has written permission from the landowners of the parcel on which work will occur under this Agreement. 9. Notwithstanding Exhibit A, if this project is a capital outlay project,the Grantee agrees to submit a report to the SWRCB at the completion of the project that summarizes the completed project and Identifies additional steps necessary to achieve the purposes of the local watershed management plan,as such term is defined under Water Code§79078. 10. The Grantee certifies that if a recovery plan for coho,steelhead, or other threatened or endangered aquatic species exists,this project is consistent with such a plan and, if feasible, implements actions in such a plan. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date I Toed.Or Dlr. 9/2e/0, AGENDA REPORT Rem Numbe Item 9Number (b)6I Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Risk Manager SUBJECT: SUMMONS 8 COMPLAINT RE FREITAS V. ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, ET AL. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file summons and complaint re Freitas v. Orange County Water District, Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC310833, and authorize General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. SUMMARY Please see attached memo dated 4/12/04 from General Counsel. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: I ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ALTERNATIVES CEOA FINDINGS ATTACHMENTS Memo from General Counsel. GGS:MW:BG H beaaaagendaB rd Agenda R.pm132W0 Bc.NAgenda RpoMWCOeveam 91b)Summand Fread,ax Re.Hed:gdguw Page 1 LAW OFFICES OF WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART A PROFESSIONAL CORPORNTION MEMORANDUM TO Chair and Members of Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District FROM: General Counsel DATE April 12, 2004 RE Freitas v. Orange County Water District, Orange County Sanitation District, at al. Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC310833 On February 27, 2004, OCSD was served with a summons and complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court by Hello Freitas, alleging negligence and statutory liability, caused as a result of a construction project undertaken solely by the Orange County Water District on Newland and Ellis Avenues. While traveling on Newland, Plaintiffs motorcycle collided with another motorist, who was attempting to make a left-hand turn onto Ellis, resulting in major injuries to the Plaintiff. OCSD has determined that this is not a District-related project, and subsequently the lawsuit has been tendered to both Orange County Water District and its Contractor, Colich Construction for defense. However, it is recommended that the Board authorize General Counsel to take all necessary measures to protect the interests of OCSD, in the event Colich and the Water District fail to do so. Our initial effort in the defense of OCSD has been to attempt to persuade counsel for Plaintiff that he has wrongfully named OCSD in the lawsuit, and furthermore, the proper venue should be Orange County. We believe that OCSD will be dismissed from the suit, but by law,we must file our answer to the complaint. In addition, OCSD has just received a cross-complaint for indemnity from OCWD, on the theory of potential proof that OCSD was somehow al fault. nx OMAS L WOODRUFF ENERAL COUNSEL TLW:pj cc: Mr. B.P. Anderson Mr. G.G. $treed Mr. D.A. Ludwin Mr. M.D. White nsacasn BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeeremare I Toee.ordr. 4128104 AGENDA REPORT Item Number item Number 9(c) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: RESOLUTION No. OCSD 04-12, APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES FOR OCSD TO ACT AS AGENTS ON ITS BEHALF IN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY JUDICIAL DISTRICTS, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98-27 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 04-12, A Resolution of the Board Of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District Appointing Representatives for the District to Act As Agents on its Behalf in the Small Claims Courts of Orange County Judicial Districts, and Repealing Resolution No. OCSD 98-27. SUMMARY The District's list of appointed representatives who act as agents on it's behalf in Orange County Small Claims Courts has not been updated since 1998. Adoption of this Resolution will update that list and appoint current Finance and Accounting Division employees to serve as District Representatives. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS Resolution No. 98-27. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) R VeOReMaBwrtl ApeMa RepOR52fAl Boortl Apentla..a .bNUm W)5.1dametlx Re.,;etl M ,03 Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 04-12 GGS:MW:BG H aepl,g da aie4QMa RQ �" B rd Ape aRp MSS vMm ftl SrtttdWm.O Rem.p ...o Page 2 v RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 04-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE DISTRICT TO ACT AS AGENTS ON ITS BEHALF IN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY JUDICIAL DISTRICTS, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 98-27 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it necessary to periodically commence legal action in the Small Claims Courts to collect debts owing to the District; and, WHEREAS, legal proceedings in the Small Claims Courts must be filed on a continuing, periodic basis; and, WHEREAS, the rules of court provide that attorneys shall not be allowed to appear and represent parties to these proceedings; and, WHEREAS, it is necessary to appoint agents for the District to act for and on its behalf in the Small Claims Courts of four of the Orange County Judicial Districts. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That those persons set forth on Exhibit "A"to this Resolution are appointed to represent and appear for the District on any and all claims filed in the Small Claims Courts of the West Orange County Judicial District, the North Orange County Judicial District, the Central Orange County Judicial District, and the Orange County Harbor Judicial District. Section 2: That Resolution No. OCSD 98-27 is hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 28, 2004. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary 1 V' EXHIBIT"A" RESOLUTION NO. 04-12 Danny L. Dillon Robert Geggie Gary G. Streed Michael D. White Angela Belt Cristina Stanford 2 f DRAFT MINUTES OF STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, March 24, 2004 A meeting of the Steering Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Wednesday, March 24, 2004 at 5 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Shirley McCracken, Chair Don Hughes Steve Anderson, Vice Chair Darrel Cahoon Jim Ferryman, Chairman, OMTS Committee Gerhardt Van Drie Brian Donahue, Chairman, PDC Committee Jim Silva, County Supervisor STAFF PRESENT: Norm Eckenrode, Past Board Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager Peer Swan, Director Brady's alternate Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Gary Streed, Director of Finance/Treasurer Directors Absent: Carol Beekman, Communications Services Brian Brady, Chairman, FAHR Committee Manager Layne Baroldi, Legal & Regulatory Affairs Liaison Jan Collins, Principal HR Analyst Mike Moore, ECM Manager Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS Gerhardt Van Drie addressed the Committee regarding the refusal of the General Manager to allow a demonstration project at the front entrance before a board meeting. (4) RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the February 25, 2004 Steering Committee meeting were approved as drafted. (5) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Shirley McCracken announced that reservations for the April 29-May 1 Squaw Valley CASA conference are due to Jean Tappan March 26. She also reminded the directors of the two special workshops; March 31 on the CIP and April 21 on the GWRS program. Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 2 March 25, 2004 (6) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson provided reports on biosolids Including the loss of our Nevada site in Nye County and the very favorable comments staff has received from the Grand Jury on our biosolids management program. The Steering Committee agreed with staff recommendation that the standing committees not meet in August. The General Manager and Director of Finance updated the steering committee on the early budget numbers for next fiscal year. At this time a 7.5 percent increase in our operating budget for treatment facilities and various environmental protection programs is anticipated. There will be a one-day meeting of the Orange County Leadership Symposium on April 30. Jim Silva hosted a luncheon last week with several agencies to address ways to cooperate with each other and understand institutional arrangements with other agencies. It was agreed that these meetings will continue with different sponsors for each meeting. The General Manager reviewed the bid results for the GW RS advance water treatment system and discussed the actions the agencies and the design engineers have planned, before reporting to the GW RS Steering Committee on April 12. The recent OC Registernews articles and opinion piece about urban runoff and secondary treatment were discussed. Director Ferryman asked the General Manager to respond to the editorial. Mr. Anderson reported that a meeting has been scheduled for April 5 with SAW PA, counsel and Gary Hunt to continue negotiations on the SARI protection or relocation agreement. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff updated the directors on Senator Ortiz's bill that is focused on correcting abuses by some special districts, including limiting compensation, stipends, perks and ethical conduct. No hearings have been scheduled to date. Mr. Woodruff also mentioned that because our property taxes are earmarked for debt payment, they should be safe from any takeover by the state. An item will be going to the April Board to reaffirm our position. (8) DISCUSSION ITEMS (Items A-B) A. The Agenda Items scheduled to be reviewed by the Board's working committees in April were reviewed. B. The agenda items scheduled to be presented to the Board at tonight's meeting were reviewed. (9) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. (10) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING Director Eckenrode asked that the GW RS visitors center be discussed ! Minutes of the Steering Committee Page 3 March 25,2004 (11) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND/OR STAFF REPORT There were none. (12) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, April 28, 2004 at 5 p.m. The next Board Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday,April 28, 2004 at 7 p.m. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened at 6:08 p.m. in Closed Session, pursuant to Sections 54956.9, 54957.6, and 54957 to discuss two items of pending litigation, and three items of employment actions , each of which is listed on the published agenda. Minutes of the Closed Session are on file with the Board Secretary. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Steering Committee have been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54957.2,and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of the recommended actions will be publicly reported at the time the approved actions become final. At 6:55 p.m., the Committee reconvened in regular session. (14) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. Su fitted by: JegKrappan S4201ng Committee Secretary �:�Wecmmur..,:ro Ca,��Mrowaurro�zaw w m,w,e..ex J MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, April 7, 2004 — 5:00 P.M. A meeting of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD)was held on April 7, 2004, in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: OMTS Directors Present: Staff Present: James M. Ferryman, Chair Blake Anderson, General Manager Anna Piercy, Vice Chair Bob Ghirelli, Director of Technical Services Don Bankhead Bob Ooten, Director of Operations& Maintenance Carolyn Cavecche Patrick Miles, Director of Information Technology Cathy Green Carol Beekman, Communications Manager Paul Walker Pinky Lopez, Acting Committee Secretary Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Layne Baroldi, Legal & Regulatory Affairs Liaison Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair Mike Moore, ECM Manager Doug Stewart, Asset Management Coordinator OMTS Directors Absent: Jim Burror, Senior Engineer Tony Kawashima Mark Esquer, Engineering Manager Tod Ridgeway Michele Farmer, Senior Environmental Specialist Simon Watson, Maintenance Manager Others: Charles Egigian-Nichols, Tetra Tech, Inc. Fred Soroushian, CH2MHill John Goodman, Synagro West, Inc. (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were none. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR The Committee Chair had no report. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance ., and Technical Services Committee 1 Page 2 April 7, 2004 (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER Blake Anderson briefed the committee on J.F. Shea Co., Inc.'s bid on the Ground Water Replenishment System (GW RS) advanced water treatment plant. (6) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS a. The minutes of the March 3, 2003 Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting were approved as drafted and ordered filed. b. OMTS04-12 Receive and file Technical Services Monthly Report, which focuses on regulatory, biosolids and performance, measures for the Technical Services Department. C. OMTS04-13 Receive and file Operations & Maintenance Monthly Report, which focuses on compliance,financial data and performance measures for the Operations and Maintenance Department. d. OMTS04-14 Receive and file Information Technology Quarterly Report, which focuses on current performance trends and key technology business applications. e. OMTS04-15 Inform the Directors of staff's attendance to the XXIX Inter-American Congress of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering (AIDIS) Biosolids Meeting in San Juan, Puerto Rico, August 22.27, 2004. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to approve the recommended actions for items specified as 6(a)through (c) under Consent Calendar. (7) ACTION ITEMS a. OMTS04-16 Recommend to the Board of Directors to (1) Approve a staff-led asset management program to implement the 2002 Asset Management Strategic Plan and achieve the recommendations of the 2003 Asset Management Peer Review report; and, (2)Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and enter into a sole source agreement, Asset Management Services, Job Number SP-68-02, with GHD, LLC to provide professional services related to staff mentoring and program development for a one year period for a total amount not to exceed$368,000. Bob Ooten gave an update on the Asset Management Continuous Improvement Program. Staff is proposing a new approach to implementing the asset management at OCSD including training staff on several key asset management plan elements. Consultant assistance will be used to assist staff in implementing the program in areas where outside expertise is required. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 3 April 7, 2004 Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. b. OMTSO4-17 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize the General Manager to exercise emergency provision Article III, Section 3.07 and award a contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for Emergency Repairs and Modifications of four Plant 2 Underground Fuel Storage Tanks and related work, Specification No. E-2004-188 BD,for an amount not to exceed $280,000. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. C. OMTSO4-18 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Amendment Number 7 to the Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of OCSD's Residual Solids with Synagro West, Inc. (Synagro), providing a contract extension from June 30, 2004 to June 30, 2014 with two additional five-year extensions at a price of: 1) $37.62 per wet ton for Class B biosolids land applied in Maricopa County, Arizona; 2)$38.50 per wet ton of biosolids composted at the Regional Compost Facility in Corona, Calitomia; 3) $39.50 per wet ton for Class B biosolids land applied at Fort Mojave, Arizona; 4)$43.75 per wet ton of biosolids composted at Fort Mojave, Arizona; 5)$45.50 per wet ton of biosolids composted at Arizona Soils; and 6) $49.00 per wet ton, at a minimum of 200 wet tons per day, of Class B biosolids composted at the South Kern Industrial Center for an annual amount not to exceed $5,800,000 per year. Layne Baroldi presented for consideration an amendment to the Synagro biosolids management contract to obtain capacity at a proposed composting facility that has been sited, designed and permitted and is anticipated to be in operation by January 2006. Motion: Moved, seconded and duly carried to recommend approval to the Board of Directors. (8) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. OMTSO4-19 Status of Ocean Monitoring Program (OMP) Vessel Mike Moore gave an update on the status of the OMP vessel. Expected delivery is Fall 2004. OCSD staff Fred O'Brien, Scientist in Environmental Compliance& Monitoring (ECM) Division is currently being certified and licensed as a Skipper to oversee the vessel. It is a requirement to name a vessel for Identification purposes. Due to time constraint,the vessel needed to be named at least a month before the vessel goes to its final phase of construction. Carol Beekman presented the idea of soliciting OCSD employees' input in naming the vessel. The Directors have Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 4 April 7, 2004 suggested that the general public be involved in the naming process to create awareness on the purpose of the vessel. They have also suggested utilizing the different resources possible, i.e. voting poll on the OCSD website, communication with school districts, newspaper advertisement. Carol will take the lead in disseminating information and administering the process of picking a name for the vessel. Once a name is picked, a ceremony will be held with invited guests Including school children presenting it as an educational eventlactivity. (9) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY The Director of Information Technology reported the completion of two major projects, JDE Financial Information System (FIS) and Intranet Development.The JDE FIS project was completed under budget. The Intranet is currently being utilized as a more widely adopted tool for communication providing connections to other on-line applications as well as up to date information on the departmental/division projects and activities. The director also reported on two recent cost reduction efforts initiated by IT and Purchasing staff: 1) Switching to SBC as our telephone provider reducing our cost by 45%. 2) Switching from AT&T to Cingular Wireless as our cell phone provider cutting our cost by 50%. The director also reported that HP multi-function devices will be purchased to replace most Xerox copiers currently on lease. After considerable review, it was determined that purchasing and maintaining the new higher technology printing devices is more cost effective than maintaining the existing leased equipment. (10) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The District received a notice of violation on the Underground Storage Tanks at both plants. A detailed plan is being put together in order to bring it into compliance. With the plan in place, we are expected to be in compliance by summer 2004. (11) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES The Director of Technical Services informed the committee that the Tour of Long Beach Water Department Desalination Plant is scheduled on Thursday, April 22,2004. Seats for six people are available for anyone interested to join the tour. Blake had requested that the issue of desalination be presented and explained to Board. (12) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY There were none. Minutes of the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Page 5 April 7, 2004 (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (14) FUTURE MEETING DATES The next Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting is scheduled for May 5, 2004 at 5 p.m. (15) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (16) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 6:39 p.m. Submitted by: Pinky E. Lopez Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Acting Committee Secretary H:WepP genda\OMTS\2004\0404\040704 OMTS Mmutes.dx OMTS COMMITTEE Meeting Da To ad.of Di 9P/04 4/28/04 AGENDA REPORT IDOn Numbs H mNumber OMISO4 16 12(b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Bob Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator. Doug Stewart, Asset Management Coordinator SUBJECT: ASSET MANAGEMENT, JOB NO. SP-68-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION 1) Approve a staff-led asset management program to implement the 2002 Asset Management Strategic Plan and achieve the recommendations of the 2003 Asset Management Peer Review report, and 2) Authorize the General Manager to negotiate and enter into a sole source agreement, Asset Management Services, Job Number SP-68-02, with GHD, LLC to provide professional services related to staff mentoring and program development for a one year period for a total amount not to exceed $368,000. SUMMARY • Staff is developing another implementation plan for asset management. Staff will continue to work on the implementation plan this year and next. The implementation plan will be completed in January 2005. Staff will also continue implementing key asset management program elements. The work will require continued consultant expertise to supplement staff efforts. • The program elements to be worked on in addition to the implementation plan include an asset management plan that will provide improved future rehabilitation and repair cost data which will be used for future rate determination; continued work on the capital improvement program to improve optimizing the planning of CIP projects; developing condition assessment tools that will focus on an improved understanding of future capital rehabilitation projects; and work to optimize the preventative maintenance program. • In December 2002, the Asset Management Strategic Plan was approved by the OCSD Board of Directors. It contains the following objectives: improved management of OCSD infrastructure, lower total cost of ownership of OCSD infrastructure, and improved balance between capital and O&M expenditures. fC • In April 2003, the Board directed staff to obtain an independent peer review of the asset management strategic plan. This was completed through a contract with the National Water Research Institute in October 2003. The report prepared by NWRI was presented to the Board Steering Committee in January 2004 and the Board in February 2004. • During the past few months, staff has engaged Roger Byrne with Parsons-GHD to assist staff in implementing asset management in the CIP validation process, through a task order with the IPMC. The Engineering Department has reported about $140 million in project deferrals and deletions, about 20% of which are attributed to the use of asset management. • Staff is now proposing a new approach to implementing asset management at OCSD. Staff will plan and execute the implementation program. We propose a staff-driven asset management program that uses a limited amount of consultant expertise to assist staff. As staff builds expertise the consultants will be phased out. The products are an implementation plan produced in January 2005 to provide detailed future program scope, schedule, and budget and the development of processes and tools over the next year that will improve the delivery of the capital projects; will plan improved maintenance decisions, and reduce agency-wide costs. Staff will also train on several key asset management plan elements. Consultant assistance will be used to assist staff in implementing the program in areas where outside expertise is required. • Staff proposes a one year contract in which GHD (Roger Byrne and Brenton Marshall), will be in-house advisors to the staff steering committee and staff implementation subcommittees and help us prepare our implementation plan and approach. Mr. Byrne has been acting in this capacity at OCSD over the past several months aiding in implementing several asset management practices in this years CIP development with very successful results. A similar approach of using outside expertise as staff adjuncts is being used by Seattle PUC as shown in the case studies in the attached appendix. • A sole source agreement with GHD is requested for the following reasons: Significant momentum and culture change within the organization has been developed over the past months with Mr. Byrne acting as an in-house advisor on the CIP validation. By continuing with GHD as advisors, the momentum and change processes that have been started will be able to be maintained. With the work that Mr. Byrne has done with OCSD in developing the asset Management Strategic Plan, Mr. Byrne is best able to help us to frame those recommendations into a plan that fits OCSD and our needs. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The total current project budget for SP-68-2 is $16,550,000. Please refer to attached Budget Information Table. Prior expenditures on asset management under SP-68 are $455,617 for consultant costs and $164,177 for staff costs to produce the strategic plan for a total cost of $619,794. BUDGET IMPACT The budget requested for this work is shown on the budget information table (attached). The current authorization request is for$368,000 for consultant costs. It is estimated that staff will devote approximately 8500 hours and staff costs of$846,000 for the next year. ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CIP Savings this year As a part of the CIP validation for the FY 2004-05 budget, over 120 projects, both existing and proposed, were subjected to analysis using advanced asset management techniques. The first tool was a Confidence Level Review of each project, used to help determine whether the project scope, timing, and justification were sufficiently planned and developed. The second tool was an analysis of the risk reduction represented in each project. Criteria were developed for each tool that was used to rank projects and identify where improvements in each project could (should) be made prior to funding them for further completion. At the time of writing this report over$140 million in project deferrals or deletions had been identified for next year's CIP budget. An analysis of the savings generated by asset management related decisions in this years CIP validation resulted in a net reduction of$23.5 million in net present value project costs (NPV), a savings of$1.2 million in interest costs (NPV), and a deferral of $6.8 million in interest costs (NPV). Staff approach to Implementation Staff has recently formed an Asset Management Steering Committee(AMSC),with representatives from each Department at OCSD. The purpose of the committee is to plan and oversee the development and implementation of an agency-wide asset management program. Ten subcommittees have been identified for development of the program: v • Total Asset Management Plan • Levels of Service • Condition Assessment • Asset Register— Data • Optimal CIP • Optimal Maintenance Plans • Business Risk Exposure • AM Information Systems • Organizational Alignment • Training— HR It will likely take the AMSC, and the subcommittees until January 2005 to complete the work plan and develop the scope, schedule, and budget for the entire implementation program. Upon completion of the work plan, staff will seek approval from the Board of the approach and budget prior to proceeding. Consultant Assistance Staff is proposing a one year contract with GHD in the amount of$368,000, of which $118,000 will be dedicated to FY 04-05 CIP validation process enhancement. The work with GHD may carry over into a second year, which would be negotiated and approved separately at that time. Following is a table which shows the proposed breakdown of the tasks and hours for each. Asset Management Consultant Support 2004-05 Cost($) CIP Validation Program 118,000 Implementation Plan 165,500 State of the Assets ReportlrAMP 61,500 Training and other tasks 23,000 Total 368,000 Other Agency approaches to AM Staff have contacted three other major wastewater agencies in the US who are implementing advanced asset management programs; Massachusetts Water Resources Agency (MWRA), Sacramento Regional Consolidated Sewer Districts, and Seattle Public Utilities Commission. These case studies (prepared by each organization) are attached as an Appendix 1 for your review and consideration. ALTERNATIVES Do not proceed with implementing the staff proposed Asset Management Program at OCSD but work on several parts of the program. CEQA FINDINGS Not applicable ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Other Agency Implementation of Asset Management—Three Case Studies BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Asset Management Improvement Program SP- 68-2 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECTR REVISEDASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET FV 02103 TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE)%) ' Project Development $ $ Studies/Permitting $ $ $ Consultant PSA $ - S 2.500,000 $ - $ 2.500.000 $ - $ 364.000 $ 364,000 $ Staff $ - $ 10,550,000 $ - S 10,550,000 $ - $ 846.000 $ 846,000 $ Construction Contract $ $ Construction Administration $ $ Construction Ins eatlon $ $ Contingency $ 3,500,000 $ - $ 3,500.000 Reimbursable Costs $ - $ $ TOTAL Is - 1 $ 16,550,000 $ - $ 16,550,000 $ - $ 1.210.0001 $ 1,210,000 1 $ Mwa.LlalergVormslbxgel table Form Re lsetl 12119198 MWRA's Asset Management Program —A Case Study for OCSD MWRA OVERVIEW The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority(MWRA)is responsible for providing wholesale water and sewerage services, in whole or in part,to sixty-one communities, and 2.6 million people. In addition to its operating responsibilities,MWRA is responsible for rehabilitating, repairing and maintaining the regional water and sewerage systems. Since its assumption of the ownership and operations of these systems in 1985,MWRA has undertaken an ambitious program of water and wastewater system capital improvements with estimated expenditures for fiscal years 1986 through 2009 of over$7 billion. Under one massive construction effort,the Boston Harbor Project,the MWRA assumed maintenance responsibility of the$3.8 billion dollar Deer Island Treatment Plant(DITP). As the second largest wastewater treatment facility in the nation, it is designed to treat 1.2 billion-gallons-per-day. In addition, the Agency had embarked on several other large capital projects that would require similar asset care including a new water filtration plant. Given the significant value and critical nature of the MWRA assets, maintenance is of paramount importance. In 1996 the Facilities Asset Management Program (FAMP)initiative was created as a comprehensive, agency-wide effort to most efficiently and effectively manage the region's water and sewer infrastructure. GETTING STARTED - 1996-1999 Built Senior Management support and conceptualized the multi-phased FAMP program -2000 Issued Request for Proposals(RFP)for initial consultant support. Consultant support is designed to be temporary and jump-start the effort where in-house staff will be trained and take control of the FAMP efforts. - 1999/2000 Assigned two full-thee positions to the program. A Program Manager position to oversee consultant efforts and develop and oversee future program phases. And an Asset Manager position to focus on implementation and sustainment of newly selected business practices identified by the FAMP consultant. -Informal benchmarking/site visits conducted(similar to a gap analysis) and the phased program updated to include investigation and adoption of additional business practices. Phased program currently scheduled from 2000 to 2008 (see attached FAMP Model) -Currently there are eleven (11) in-house task teams helping to implement new practices.Today they include the following teams: Asset Replacement;Metrics;New Maintenance Procedures;Warehouse; Interceptor Renewal; RCM Implementation;Criticality; Lubrication; Condition Monitoring Design& Installation(Temperature&Vibration Contract); Condition Monitoring Program Development; Maximo (MWRA's CMMS). ULTIMATE GOALS The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority(MWRA)has created its FAMP initiative for its water and wastewater facilities to plan, manage,and coordinate the engineering,maintenance,operation,and financing required to maintain these facilities to regulatory requirements. FAMP can be further described as having two objectives: 1. Cost effectively replace the less durable capital components of the facilities at the appropriate time to ensure reliable plant operation and preserve the value of the original investment. 2. Prolong the equipment life and control the rate of replacement(i.e. avoid large spending spikes for consolidated retrofit or rehabilitation projects). The Authority has initiated this project to develop the most efficient strategy to integrate maintenance, operations,and engineering activities to support the FAMP objectives. PROGRAM ELEMENTS Initiated as an O&M effort the asset management initiative focused on key components including a maintenance strategy(Reliability Centered Maintenance-RCM),a computerized maintenance management system(CMMS—MAXIMO), Condition Monitoring,Materials Management,Training programs and a regular Communication Plan. While the initial phases mainly focused on equipment assets,current and future phases include linear (pipeline) and building asset management. Additionally, given an upcoming CIP funding cap,the Asset Replacement Task Team efforts are now focusing on new approaches to the Capital Improvement Planning(CIP)process. COSTS(CONSULTANT) Since 2000,the MWRA has invested some $2.6M in Phase I& II asset management consulting services including the design of a permanent condition-monitoring program for critical rotating assets. A cost breakdown follows: 15% inventory/tagging of remote wastewater assets; 27%RCM pilots and training; 32%permanent CM equipment design/installation oversight; 6%Maximo support; 6%Business Practices Support(non-equipment maintenance strategies,equipment replacement strategies, materials and inventory support, root cause failure analysis);4%condition monitoring program development (lubrication program assessment, technique needs assessment); and 10%project management. There is a future CIP placeholder for Phase III consultant support. EXAMPLE BENEFITS TO DATE There are many examples to date that have allowed the program to maintain significant momentum and a few examples follow: heightened communication between departments;new and standardized procedures; development and adoption of performance improvement metrics; optimization of PM program and documented cost savings; introduction and adoption of predictive maintenance programs and documented cost savings; enhanced communication and teamwork between management and workforce. PROGRAM AS OF 2004 The FAMP initiative is entering into its fifth year of implementation. Management as well as the various implementation task teams are focused on completing Phase II efforts ensuring that these elements are securely in place. Although Phase III has been conceptually planned,the later part of 2004 will focus on detailing activities with expected consultant support beginning in mid-end of 2005. FUTURE OF PROGRAM Initially focused on equipment assets at DITP, the current and future programs are focused on the linear and building envelope assets,CIP process changes and incorporation of new practices into future design specifications (i.e. acceptance testing,designing for CM programs such as oil,vibration and infrared analysis). Benchmarking will always play an integral role for continuous improvement. Asset Management Program Development at Seattle Public Utilities Seattle Public Utilities(SPU)was formed in 1997 with the merger and consolidation of various City departments. SPU provides water, wastewater,storm water,and solid waste utility services for the City of Seattle. It is also a wholesale provider of water to 27 other cities and water districts in the surrounding area. Over the years the utility had participated in numerous research studies,benchmarking and other projects that focused primarily on maintenance work. A work management system(Maximo) was initiated in 1995 by the former Seattle Water Department with the first phase of implementation completed in 1997. By 2000 the majority of the water system was included in Maximo,providing the essential asset register and hierarchy to begin a program for water assets. Unfortunately,the same situation did not exist in the other business areas. Initial interest in developing a comprehensive asset management program began in late 2000. Building upon the work mentioned above,SPU began to realize that it needed to focus not only on the maintenance practices associated with the asset,but rather the function of that asset. A focus on the asset's function ensures that the larger, strategic issues are explored having to do with the ability of that asset to deliver its service within the context of the total system reliability and cost effectiveness. This realization was the genesis of a strategic approach to asset management. Research quickly determined that few US utilities were employing asset management techniques, but that internationally many utilities were very advanced. The best guidance for program implementation found was from Australia and New Zealand. SPU utilized the International Infrastructure Management Manual extensively. SPU staff also had the opportunity to meet with Australian utility representatives at various conferences and through participation in AW WARF research projects. SPU chose not to use consultants at this point primarily because of budget constraints. The initial work focused on existing water assets. SPU had a good inventory of its water assets, but needed to know more about their condition,the costs to maintain them,their life expectancy and the level of service required from these assets. This data gathering effort was intensive,time consuming,and controversial with many disagreements. There were several decisions and incidents that slowed development of the program: • There was no dedicated staffing or budget to this program. Instead it was an added assignment to a senior level employee who had to work within the funding for existing programs. Senior management offered little support or guidance. • The program kick-off meeting was on February 28",2001. During that meeting the 6.8 Nisqually earthquake struck, killing any program momentum. • The program leadership changed in mid-2001. • The emphasis on security after September 11'put further constraints on resources. The program regained focus in 2002. Chuck Clarke became the Director of SPU in January. He recognized the importance of asset management and the incorporation of its principles throughout the organization. A new Asset Management Team was created with dedicated staffing and budget. In order to obtain in-house expertise, Mr. Clarke negotiated a deal with the Hunter Water Corporation of Australia to obtain the services of their senior managers for 18 months. Kevin Young joined SPU from October 2002 through April 2003. Simon Zander arrived in May of 2003 and will stay until the end of April 2004. These two individuals brought practical knowledge in developing an asset management program and served as in-house consultants. The Asset Management Team under Mr. Young's guidance brought a level of discipline and formality to the process of managing SPU's assets. Three major themes emerged; required service levels, economic analysis,and risk management. These themes would become integrated into decision making on all activities concerning assets. Their importance can be seen in the development of the following items: Service Levels and"Triple Bottom Line"Objective Establishing the customer and environmental service levels to be provided are critical issues since they dictate the asset performance requirement. Service levels also have implications on the resources needed and the impacts incurred to achieve them. SPU has adopted a"triple bottom line"objective,where economic,societal,and environmental impacts are analyzed collectively and minimized to the extent possible while meeting the desired level of service. Strategic Asset Management Plans(SAMP) SAMPs set the strategic framework for the utility's asset management program. They are developed for a class of assets and are normally prepared looking forward for a 5-year period. A class of assets is defined as a complete set of infrastructure and events(O&M,replacement, environmental, etc)that occur providing a service. These asset classes have been broken down further into sub classes. For example,the Water Distribution asset class includes the sub classes pipes, reservoirs,pump stations,and appurtenances. The key elements of a SAMP are: • Service Levels • Criticality • Asset Profile • Operations and Maintenance Strategies • Replacement and Renewal Strategies,and CIP Plan • Data/Process/Tools • Action and Tactical Plans Proiect Develonment Plans(PDP) SPU realized that the ambitious CIP program of the last 5 years was driving debt service upward at an alarming rate. This was creating the need for double-digit rate increases for the foreseeable future,a practice that could not be sustained. The Asset Management Team under Mr. Young's guidance began a review of all CIP projects over$250K. The project manager must prepare a r Project Development Plan(PDP)and present it to the Asset Management Committee for funding approval. The PDP is a business case that outlines the need for the project,the options to meet the need, and a cost(benefit analysis. The PDP considers life cycle costs,which included the O&M costs over the service life of the asset. The project must have a positive net present value in order to be fimded. This review process has already reduced the planned CIP by over 25%, and is forcing project managers to formally consider the O&M impacts of their projects. While SPU has made considerable progress in developing its asset management program it still has a long way to go. Specific initiatives for the future include a focus on reliability-centered maintenance,development/refinemmt of information systems to manage all of the asset data, and determination of service levels for all assets. Economic evaluations,particularly the valuation of project benefits,need to be more consistent. Staff needs to be trained on asset management principles in order to fully integrate it into the utility. Asset management is the cornerstone of SPU's business philosophy. This is a program that doesn't have an end only refinements to the process. a Asset Management Program Development Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District County Sanitation District-1 March 23,2004 The Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District(SRCSD)and the County Sanitation District-1 (CSD-I)are independently governed special districts that are part of the County of Sacramento's Water Quality Department. The SRCSD provides wastewater conveyance, treatment, and disposal services for the urbanized portion of Sacramento County. A single 181 million gallon per day capacity, secondary treatment wastewater plant provides all treatment services for the Sacramento area. The plant is expanded incrementally as needed to serve growth in the region. The District also operates and maintains more than 70 miles of interceptor pipeline, ranging to 120 inches diameter and several large wastewater pumping stations. CSD-1 provides wastewater collection services in the urbanized unincorporated area of the County; in the cities of Citrus Heights,Elk Grove and Rancho Cordova; and in a portion of the cities of Sacramento and Folsom. The District operates and maintains over 2,600 miles of pipeline and approximately 150 sewage lift stations. The districts have ongoing challenges including wastewater treatment and collection system assets that are aging and are anticipated to need significant re-investment to rehabilitate and replace. In addition,the region is experiencing a period of sustained growth requiring an over- expanding network of pipeline/pumping assets and treatment plant expansions. Also,there is the ongoing and not clearly defined challenge of changing environmental regulations. Current regulations are increasing in number and stringency, and proactively managing the districts within those regulations is an increasingly complex matter. The Districts have identified a comprehensive asset management(AM)program as the method to address these and other business challenges. AM is expected to help the districts better address three very important aspects of the business; customer levels of service, cost effectiveness,and risk. The development of a comprehensive asset management program may radically revise how decisions are reached, how the Districts view their relationship with their ratepayers and their elected policy-makers,and how our incoming and expended resources are managed. The development of the districts' AM program began by staff becoming familiar with AM practices, and programs being developed throughout the world. Rather than beginning immediately with implementation activities, the districts decided to begin with the development of AM strategic and implementation plans. These planning documents will provide the project priorities, short term and long term goals, resource needs, schedules,and implementation program to continue to improve district performance. The strategic planning effort began with the selection of the AM consultant in June, 2003. The consultants will assist the Districts with the development of the planning documents. The AM program is currently in the assessment of current practices portion of the strategic plan. This is a thorough assessment of all significant asset,financial, and business practices to determine how effectively the organizations are operated and managed. This portion of the work is expected to be complete in April of this year. The project will then move into the"visioning' which is the process by which the districts determine where they want to be with respect to best appropriate AM practices. The strategic and implementation plans are expected to be complete in nine months,by early 2005. At that point, many of the implementation activities and projects will commence,with some being short tens(3-5 years)and others being longer term(>5 years). With time it is expected that asset management practices and principles will become part of the district's normal way of doing business and become part of the organizational culture. Significant benefits have already been achieved through asset management activities. Specifically, approximately$20 million(in today's dollars)has been saved through a"business case"evaluation process undertaken in mid-2003 that focused on 2 capital improvement projects. This is a rigorous project analysis that takes a"business person's"perspective on whether a project should be implemented. This analysis is done to ensure that project level of service,cost effectiveness,risk,environmental compliance,and other social and non-financial factors justify the need for the project. The organization is further refining this process to ensure that the best decisions are made with respect to implementation of capital and repair/replacement projects. Ultimately,the AM program is expected to allow the districts to better achieve the goal of providing the customer(rate payer)with long term sustainable assets, at lowest cost,at a reasonable level of risk. OMTS COMMITTEE Meedng Date roBd.orDr. a/w/oa a/ze/oa AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number ormsoa-v u(C) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert J. Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Mark Tomko, Engineer SUBJECT: EMERGENCY REPAIR AND MODIFICATION OF FOUR Plant 2 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize the General Manager to exercise emergency provision of Resolution No. OCSD 04.08, Article III, Section 3.03(C), and award a contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for Emergency Repairs and Modifications of four Plant 2 Underground Fuel Storage Tanks and related work, Specification No. E-2004-188BD, for an amount not to exceed $280,000. SUMMARY • In order to protect the public health and the environment, as well as avoid permanently closing four critical underground fuel storage tanks, repairs to the tanks must be completed on an emergency basis to comply with the Orange County Health Care Agency Senate Bill 989 requirements. • In accordance with State Senate Bill 989, the District began testing the nineteen underground storage tanks that are located throughout both treatment facilities and at one pump station. • The secondary piping on four of the underground fuel storage tanks at Plant 2 failed the leak-testing process. • The four fuel tanks support critical treatment facilities, so they may not be removed from service for an extended period of time without providing temporary fuel storage facilities. • The Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) requires that the District immediately repair the fuel tanks or remove them from service. • The Orange County Health Care Agency considers the non-compliant underground storage tanks an immediate threat to the public and the environment and has determined that a period of six to twelve months to complete the repairs is unacceptable. • The time necessary for procuring services through the District's current Delegation of Authority policy requirements and the associated procedures, including technical support, do not provide the opportunity to complete the required work in the period defined by the Orange County Health Care agency. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS NA PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY It is anticipated the emergency repairs will cost about$280,000, or less. Staff has met with three fueling-facility contractors to verify this cost. Each contractor suggested that a reasonable budget amount at about $70,000 per tank. The O&M Maintenance division (Division 850) has budgeted funds (Operating budget line item No. 128) for repair services during the year. While this emergency repair was not specifically budgeted, the cost for the emergency repair will be charged to this budget item. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 128) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background • The new underground storage tank (UST) regulations of California Senate Bill 989 (SB 989 October 10, 1999) require additional tank testing, repairs, and improvements. • The new regulations resulted in a large amount of work and a limited number of contractors available to perform testing and repairs. • The Orange County Sanitation District (District) hired a UST contractor after development of a scope through District Purchasing practices, but the contractor was not responsive to District needs in a timely fashion. • The testing work was finally completed by the UST contractor. However, the untimeliness of the contractor in completing the required work left no time for repairs V and improvements by the deadline. Therefore, the District received a Notice of Violation from the Orange County Health Care Agency. • The District has either closed or drained some of the non-critical underground storage tanks. The tanks that are critical for ensuring reliable plant operations must be completed in an expeditious manner. Designation of Authority to Issue Emergency Status Section 3.09: Purchases: Emergencv. Whenever an emergency arises which is, or may be, a threat to the continued required operations of the wastewater treatment plants and facilities owned by OCSD, or when purchases are immediately necessary for the preservation of life or property, or to avoid a threat to the public health or safety, the Division may purchase supplies, services, materials, or equipment required for immediate use, in an amount greater than One Hundred Thousand ($100,000) Dollars without observing the procedures set forth in this Resolution. The General Manager or his designee shall advise the District Chair and/or Vice Chair, as appropriate, of the action taken, and such action shall be ratified by the Board of Directors at its next regular meeting. ALTERNATIVES • Drain tanks under temporary closure, install temporary above ground storage tanks, and complete the repairs over a longer schedule. • Abandon the closed tanks and reconstruct new above ground or underground storage tanks. These alternatives are more expensive than making emergency repairs and will increase the vulnerability of critical plant processes. CEQA FINDINGS NA ATTACHMENTS None OMITS COMMITTEE MdangDR ToBd.ofDir. 04/07/04 09/28/a AGENDA REPORT m Numira Ism NumO OMI5a4-18 12 d Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Robert P. Ghirelli, D.Env., Director of Technical Services Originator: Layne Baroldi, Legal & Regulatory Affairs Liaison SUBJECT: SYNAGRO WEST, INC. CONTRACT AMENDMENT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment Number 7 to the Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of OCSD's Residual Solids with Synagro West, Inc. (Synagro), providing a contract extension from June 30, 2004 to June 30, 2014 with two additional five-year extensions at a price of: 1) $37.62 per wet ton for Class B biosolids land applied in Maricopa County, Arizona; 2) $38.50 per wet ton of biosolids composted at the Regional Compost Facility in Corona, California; 3) $39.50 per wet ton for Class B biosolids land applied at Fort Mojave, Arizona; 4) $43.75 per wet ton of biosolids composted at Fort Mojave, Arizona; 5) $45.50 per wet ton of biosolids composted at Arizona Soils; and 6) $49.00 per wet ton, at a minimum of 200 wet tons per day, of Class B biosolids composted at the South Kem Industrial Center for an annual amount not to exceed $5,800,000 per year. SUMMARY • After discussing various biosolids management strategies at the March 2004 meeting, the OMTS Committee directed staff to present for consideration an amendment to the Synagro biosolids management contract to obtain capacity at a proposed composting facility that has been sited, designed and permitted and is anticipated to be in operation by January 2006. • The reason that staff is recommending this amendment is to take timely advantage of this fleeting management alternative. Without a long-term commitment, the project proponent will not be able to put a structured deal together. • The Synagro contract was initiated in June 1988 and amended six times. Amendment No. 6 was executed in July 2002 and expires in July 2005. • Currently, Synagro manages approximately 30 percent of OCSD's biosolids production of 650 wet tons per day through land application of Class B biosolids on tribal land in San Bernardino County, on private land in Arizona, and by composting on tribal land in San Bernardino County and on private land in Riverside County and Arizona. • Due to the lack of sustainability of land application of Class B biosolids and the limited capacity at Synagro's existing composting facilities, the reliability of these options are expected to be less than three years. • The production of compost at Synagro's proposed South Kern Industrial Center (SKIC) r would meet OCSD's need to have an additional sustainable management option within three years. • Staff's recommendation to compost biosolids at SKIC complies with OCSD's Long- Range Biosolids Management Plan's goal of limiting biosolids management contracts to a maximum of one-third of total biosolids production per facility, and one-half per contractor for contractors with multiple biosolids management services. • In addition to the Synagro contract amendment, staff is pursuing a competitive Request for Proposal (RFP) process for obtaining other biosolids management options, which include drying/pellitization, energy production, soil production, and composting. • OCSD's Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan recommends pursuing these four biosolids management options through either: a) the contract amendment; or b) the RFP process. • The RFP process will take a minimum of six months to complete. RFPs are anticipated to be released in April with responses expected to be received in July. Contract recommendations are expected to be made to OMTS in October. • Since most of the options that are expected to be proposed in response to the RFPs are in the concept or the early design phase of development, the selected biosolids management option(s) pursuant to a RFP may not be successful in permitting and development. Any delay in obtaining new biosolids management options may cause OCSD's existing options to lapse prior to the implementation of newly selected options. • Site permitting, design and construction for a biosolids composting facility, pursuant to contracts awarded through the RFP process, are expected to take a minimum of three years (if achievable at all) before being ready to compost biosolids. • Utilization of RFPs only would preclude staff from amending existing contracts for opportunities that are immediately available, but may lapse due to time restraints imposed by CUP requirements for site development. • The Synagro amendment would insure that OCSD's existing biosolids management options remain in place while OCSD pursues new biosolids management technologies and market development through the RFP process. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS 1. March 2004 OMTS: Seek recommendation regarding the process to utilize the biosolids management option implementation process. 2. Receive and File: Final Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan, Job No. J-40-7, dated November 2003, and prepared by CH2M Hill, Inc. 3. November 2003 OMTS/PDC: Informational item only regarding existing policies and potential future reuse costs outlined in the Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan. e V 4. October 2003 OMTS/PDC: Informational item only regarding the various in-plant treatment optimization options evaluated in the Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan. 5. September 2003 OMTS/PDC: Informational item only regarding the biosolids product markets and product technologies. 6. May 2002 OMTS/Board: Approve Amendment No. 6 to Agreement for Removal and Disposal/Reuse of OCSD's Residual Solids with Synagro West, Inc. (formerly known as Pima Gro Systems, Inc.), providing for an extension of the contract for the period July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2005, with two additional one-year extensions, at the current all-weather cost of $39.50 per wet ton of biosolids managed for an annual amount not to exceed $2,054,000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. (Line item: 90) ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Current Biosolids Management Proaram • OCSD biosolids production is increasing as conversion to full secondary treatment proceeds. OCSD currently produces approximately 650 wet tons of Class B biosolids per day or approximately 237,000 wet tons per year. By 2020, OCSD's biosolids production is projected to be approximately 320,000 wet tons per year. • OCSD currently manages its biosolids pursuant to four contracts through: `r Land application of its Class A chemically-stabilized biosolids in both Kern County and on its ranch in Kings County; Y Land application of its Class B biosolids on tribal land in San Bernardino County as well as on private land in Nevada and Arizona, and; Composting a limited amount of biosolids on tribal land in San Bernardino County and on private land in Riverside County and in Arizona. • The current annual biosolids hauling costs for each of OCSD's biosolids management contractors are estimated in Table 1. • 0 Table 1. Current Annual Biosolids Hauling Costs Contract Est.Tons Management Cost per Estimated Processing Company End per Year' Option Wet Ton Annual Cost Location Class B land app. $39.50 Tribal AZ, CA, NV Synagro 7/2005 81,000 Class B land app. $39.50 $3,200,000 Private, AZ Class A compost $39.50 Tribal AZ, CA, NV Class A compost $39.50 Private,AZ/CA CA Soil 3/2007 26,000 Class B land app. $37.75 $982,000 Nye County, NV Products Yakima 1/2012 0 Landfill cover $35.00 $0 La Paz County,AZ Class B land app. $38.75 Arizona Tule Ranch 1/2005 130,000 Class A stabilized $35.00 $4,680,0002 Kem County Class A stabilized $33.00 Kin Court Based on 237,000 tons of biosolids produced per year. Tonnage allocations are expected to vary due to factors including inclement weather,material management issues,and regulatory developments. 2Estimated annual cost based on an average cost of$36.00 per ton. • Counties throughout California and Arizona have developed,or are developing, ordinances that restrict or ban the land application of Class B biosolids and some forms of Class A biosolids. Political and public negative perceptions about Class B biosolids land application, coupled with evermore restrictive local ordinances, are continually lessening OCSD's management options. As a result, many of OCSD's present management options for biosolids are anticipated to be eliminated in two to five years. • The estimated sustainability of OCSD's existing biosolids management program is summarized in Table 2. The conclusion from this table is that sustainable biosolids management of sufficient capacity to meet OCSD's needs is rapidly dwindling. Staff estimates that we currently have about 55% of sustainable needed capacity. Table 2. Estimated Sustainability of OCSD's Existing Biosolids Management Program Company Management Cost per Sustainability Concerns Longevity Capacity O ion/Location Wet Ton < Est.We. %. Class B land app: $39.50 ' Public Perception Indefinite' 15 Tribal AZ, CA, NV Tribal acceptance Class B land app: $39.50 ' Public/Political Perception 2 100 Private AZ . Large volume of CA biosolids Synagro Class A compost: • Stockpile for cropping r Tribal CA, AZ $39.50 • Tribal acceptance Indefir 30 Class A compost: • Odor/nuisance AZ-20+ Private AZ, CA CA CA site closes in 2008 CA-4.5 20 CA Soil Class B land app: • Public/Political Perception Products NyeCounty, NV $37.75 • Site closure W04 0 0 Landfill cover: Lack of performance bond Yakima La Paz Co $35.00 . Site closure plan Indefinite 0 • AZ regulatory compliance Class Bland app: $38 75 • Public/Political Perception 2 too Private AZ • Large volume of CA biosolids Class A stabilized: $35.00 • Kam Water Agency.MWD Indefinite 35 Tule Ranch Kern Cc , Not a biosolids"producr Class A stabilized: • Compost only In 2006 Kings County $33.00 Not a biosolids"product" 2.5 30 Experience with tribal practices indicates that biosolids land application on tribal lands may be cancelled with only one day's notice. • Regulatory restrictions imposed over the past three years have caused OCSD's biosolids management costs to rise from an average of$25 per ton to as high as$39.50 perton. • Successful management of biosolids will require the production of a marketable biosolids "product'that will result in increased costs as existing options are eliminated. It is anticipated that biosolids management costs will continue to increase from $45 to $70, or even higher for Class A biosolids production. Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan • OCSD authorized CH2M Hill to study biosolids management options (for the next 10 to 15 years) in order to layout a sustainable, publicly acceptable, environmentally-sound, and economical Long-Range Biosolids Management Plan (Plan). • The Plan included an analysis of technologies and markets for biosolids derived products. It also recommended a detailed implementation plan for OCSD's future biosolids management program. The Plan reflected the diverse nature of existing and potential markets, product technologies, and implementation approaches that could be followed to participate in sustainable markets. The Plan encouraged the use of existing biosolids management contracts and the use of merchant facility alternatives with established markets and permitted sites. The Plan identified a potential gap in biosolids management capacity over the next eight to ten years. • The Plan states that the"merchant facility" alternatives must be pursued to bridge the gap between the imminent phase-out of existing beneficial use alternatives and the implementation of OCSD-owned local facilities, since OCSD-owned facilities could take over eight years to site, permit, design, and construct. Thus, a significant near to mid- term gap in biosolids management capacity exists until new planned facilities are brought on board. • The Plan recommended that OCSD immediately begin the process of contracting for biosolids management under more sustainable merchant facility contracts, thus enabling OCSD's participation in more stable biosolids-based beneficial use markets within the next one to three years. • The Plan identified composting, heat drying, energy recovery and chemical stabilization as the most viable and economical biosolids product manufacturing processes. Implementing these technologies will provide biosolids products for sustainable markets, including compost use in Orange County by OCSD member cities and agencies. • The Plan identified a very limited number of viable merchant facilities that were in a position to implement new biosolids management options in a 3-year window. • Commitments to the new regional merchant facilities may need to extend beyond the 10-to 12-year period preferred in the Plan to make those facilities economically viable. • The Plan recommended seeking new contracts through solicitation by a RFP process and by amending existing contracts. Staff analyzed the Synagro Proposal in detail. A summary breakdown of the proposed project financials are shown in Table 3. The Synagro price proposal to OCSD is a fair and reasonable proposal for the services tendered. The estimated pre-tax profit margin for the 10-year contract life is estimated by Synagro to average 19.1 Table 3. Synagro SKIC Financial Breakdown Table Cost Item Unit Cost($/Wet Ton) Facility Capital structures, rolling stock, equipment,finance costs,etc. $16.91 Facility Operations& Maintenance salaries, electric, bulking agents, etc. $21.91 Facility Product Revenue $2.55 Transportation 340 mile round trip) $12.73 Total Cost to OCSD $49.00 • Staff compared the Synagro proposal to eight suitable biosolids composting and drying projects in California. Table 4 below shows this comparison. None of the facilities has or expects to have unused capacity for use by OCSD. This comparison shows that the Synagro SKIC proposal is a fair and reasonable value for OCSD. Table 4. Comparison of Synagro Proposal to Eight Suitable Biosolids Compost/Drying Projects Agency Technology Location Facility Status Start Cost per Date Wet Ton In-vessel • Permitted&designed LACSD-IEUA ASP' Cucamonga .Out to bid 2006 $69 Compost Sacramento Dryer Sacramento • Permitted&designed 2004 $128 Regional Pelletizer W WTP •Out to bid Las In-vessel Malibu •Operational 1995 $145 Vir enes Compost Encina Dryer Encina ' Permitted&designed 2005 $74 Pelletizer •Out to bid Corona Dryer Corona • Under construction 2005 $52 Pelletizer Santa Rosa In-vessel Rosa . Operational 19% $90 Com st LACSD Westlake Open-air ASP wogs County • In permitting process 2007 $70+ Composting . Yet to be designed OCSD Open-air ASP Kings County •Concept phase WA $76 Tule Ranch Composting Synagro Open-air ASP Kern County • Permitted&Designed 2006 SKIC Com 'n b Jan. ASP=Aerated Static P➢e composting using an amortization period of 20 years and a 5%cost of money. Svnaaro's South Kern Industrial Center • Synagro is a national water and wastewater residuals management company serving more than 1,000 municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants with operations in 40 states and the District of Columbia. • The South Kern Industrial Center(SKIC) is a 700-acre site located in southwestern, unincorporated Kern County that was created for heavy industrial manufacturing. Synagro has acquired an option on the site and has amended the sites' extensive permits to provide for biosolids composting. An amended Conditional Use Permit (CUP) was recently unanimously approved by Kern County, and the EIR was certified. The Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) permit and air quality permits are underway. The CUP allows for 400,000 wet tons per year or 1,100 tons per day of biosolids and other organics such as manure to be composted with up to 270,000 tons per year of bulking agent to create a final product volume of 550,000 cubic yards per year. • Advantages of the SKIC include its remote location, flat grade, proximity to Interstate Highway 5 and State Highway 99, and the limited adverse comments received during the EIR process. The facility appears to be the most feasible composting option in the region that satisfies the Plan's requirements. • The recommendation to amend the Synagro contract to include composting at SKIC is consistent with the Plan in that it provides flexibility for OCSD through diversification of biosolids products at a merchant facility. This is one of the first steps in moving OCSD towards its goal of utilizing at least three different sustainable product manufacturing options at any given time. • Synagro carries out its current biosolids management operations in accordance with OCSD's Environmental Management System (EMS), industry accepted Best Management Practices, and applicable regulations and permits. • Synagro will provide the capital for the construction of the facility, thereby reducing the financial risk to OCSD. If OCSD does not amend this contract with Synagro, the permits on the SKIC site may expire, the facility may not be constructed, and the composting capacity may not be available for OCSD's biosolids management. • At the request of OCSD, Tetra Tech, Inc., a professional consultant to OCSD reviewed the Synagro proposal for composting at SKIC. Tetra Tech's opinion of the proposal is that the project and facility is technically sound and that the proposed pricing is fair and reasonable. Tetra Tech's opinion letter is attached. • Staff anticipates that SKIC will be in operation by January 2006. Recommended Contract Terms • OCSD proposes to continue its current operations with Synagro prior to the start up of SKIC. Prior to commencing operations at SKIC, the following costs and destinations will be utilized by Synagro for the management of OCSD's biosolids: 1) $37.62 per wet ton for Class B biosolids land applied in Maricopa County, Arizona; 2) $38.50 per wet ton of biosolids composted at the Regional Compost Facility in Corona; 3) $39.50 per wet ton for Class B biosolids land applied at Fort Mojave; 4) $43.75 per wet ton of biosolids composted at Fort Mojave; and 5) $45.50 per wet ton of biosolids composted at Arizona Soils. • OCSD's minimum tonnage commitment to the SKIC composting facility will be 200 tons per day (on a seven day a week basis). • OCSD may request up to 10,000 tons per year of compost from SKIC for use at its wastewater plants, its member agency public works projects, or on the farmland that OCSD owns in King's County. The compost will be made available to OCSD for the cost of transportation only and Synagro will not charge OCSD for the composted product. Current cost of transportation is $10 per ton from SKIC to the OCSD King's County farm and $S per ton to the OCSD plant (based on current fuel costs and established backhauls). • All contract prices shall be adjusted annually beginning on the one year anniversary of the effective date of this Amendment and again on each anniversary of the Amendment's effective date, based on the Consumer Price Index. Anticipated Responses to the Biosolids RFPs • It is anticipated that OCSD will receive the following number of responses to the RFPs that are expected to be issued in April 2004 (Table 5): Table 5. Estimated Number of Responses to RFPs Number of On Site? Start Cost per Technology Anticipated Off Site? Permttdng/Slting Concerns Date Wet Ton Proposers In County? (EaL) ($Est.) No Mixing with contaminated soils Soil Production' 2 Yes • Air emissions 20D5 $40-$55 No . Product market Energy No . Air emissions Production s 3.4 Yes . Lack of proven technologies 2005 $50-$60 Prod No . Capacity issues 2006+ Compost/ No • CUP and EIR requirements Fertilizer 4 Yes . Potential for odor complaints 2007 $50-$70 Manufacturing, Yes • Product marketin Yes . On-site location preferred Dryer/Pellitizee 4 Yes . Undeveloped market in CA Yes . Fire potential Mixing of biosolids with retorted contaminated soil to create a Class A biosolida/soll product. "Utilization of the caloric energy value in biosolids through combustion or pyrolysis. "Mixing of biosolids and other carbon-rich feedstocks that are subsequently allowed to naturally decompose to a stabilized compost product. Heat drying of biosolids through either a direct or indirect heat source to achieve a dryness of greater than 90% solids and create a pellet-like fertilizer product. • As mentioned earlier, the RFP process would take a minimum of six months to complete. Since most of the options that are expected to be proposed in response to the RFPs are in the concept or early design phase of development, any selected biosolids management option(s) pursuant to an RFP may not be successful in permitting and development. Any delay in obtaining new biosolids management options may cause the viability of OCSD's existing options to lapse prior to the implementation of new options selected pursuant to the RFPs. • Biosolids processing site permitting, design and construction, pursuant to contracts awarded through the RFP process, are expected to take a minimum of three years (if achievable at all) before being ready to process biosolids. e ALTERNATIVES Class B biosolids land application bans in California have left only a few viable alternatives for sustainable biosolids recycling; composting, chemical stabilization, heat drying, and land application of Class B biosolids on Indian land and in Arizona. Energy costs for natural gas and electricity are increasing biosolids management costs. High diesel fuel cost is also making the transportation costs for landfilling and/or land application in Arizona more expensive. Disposal of biosolids is not an attractive management option since it is not only inconsistent with OCSD's policy of recycling, but also because of the potential for increasing costs of landfill"tip fees". Not approving the Synagro Amendment would result in OCSD performing only chemical stabilization as a biosolids management option to produce a significant amount of Class A biosolids in the immediate future. CCSD would be relying on the potentially unstable status of Arizona's regulations to allow for the continued acceptance of Class B land application and on Kings and Kern counties to accept chemically stabilized Class A biosolids in order to successfully manage its biosolids. Other biosolids management options pursuant to the RFP process are expected to take considerable time to site, permit, and construct. The Plan provided a preliminary assessment of the Mexican market for OCSD's organic materials. This work focused on the assessment of Mexican markets only, rather than the ability to site a biosolids processing facility. The assessment included discussions with U.S. Commercial Service in Los Angeles, Fresno, and Guadalajara, Mexico regarding current fertilizer export conditions, market size, and possibilities. The Plan concluded that the Mexican market opportunity would require considerable effort to penetrate and did not appear to warrant the investment in time and money. The research uncovered a number of concerns including: •Currency value fluctuation • Competition from Mexican and U.S. fertilizer companies •Strict phyto-sanitary regulations • Border closure constraints • Inadequate Mexican fertilizer distribution network • Mexican market unfamiliarity with organic fertilizer Although this work did not address the issue of siting a composting facility in Mexico, the opportunity may exist to utilize provisions in NAFTA to achieve such a goal. The feasibility of siting an operation must address the question: "Can it be taken into a maquiladora and reprocessed, and therefore be exempt from market access provisions under NAFTA Section 302.2?° Additionally, all the concerns noted above and more are likely to apply to the concept of siting an OCSD biosolids processing facility in a maquiladora. CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS • Synagro's SKIC Proposal to OCSD • Tetra Tech's Opinion of Synagro's SKIC Proposal a 02" SYNAGR.O A Ruid=b N,amBmunt Ca pa y March 8, 2004 M FEDERAL EXPRESS Mr. Layne Baroldi Legal and Regulatory Affairs Liason Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Re: Proposal for Long Term Composting Services Dear Layne: In accordance with our recent meetings and conversations, this letter is intended as a proposal for long term biosolids composting services for a portion of OCSD's production at the South Kern Industrial Center ("SKIC"). We are hopeful that you will strongly consider a contract for services at SKIC, given the quality of the project, the benefits of Class A treatment to product based material and the longstanding relationship between OCSD and Synagro. I have spent the last several years working towards a solution for the Riverside County compost site, meeting with politicians and watching what is happening to biosolids regulations across the country. I am firmly of the belief that the only way to ensure a sustainable program is to generate a product that can be bought and sold at your local home and garden store. I also believe that processing must be done in a remote location, employing the use of odor control technology and ensuring that neighbors are not impacted by the process. In response to increasing regulations and the significant problems associated with close-in windrow composting, Synagro began working to develop a compost site in South Kern County. We have secured a conditional use permit for 400,000 tons per year of biosolids and 270,000 tons per year of bullring agent. We have also received certification of our Environmental Impact Report. These documents were unanimously approved by the Kem County Board of Supervisors. In addition to these permits, we are in process for the final state approvals (which are based on the already received local approvals). We plan to open at an 800 ton per day capacity. P.O. Box 7027 • Corona • CA 91718 • 9092772662 • Fax 909.277.2960 B There are a number of benefits associated with the South Kem Facility: • It is near the 5 freeway and the transportation routes do not go through residential neighborhoods • There are no term limits on the local approvals • It is politically and community supported • It is currently designed as a $40 million aerated static pile facility, employing state of the art odor control and emissions control measures • It will alleviate the central valley agricultural burning concerns, as we will use chipped wood waste in the process • We have received approval to co-locate a blending and bagging operation adjacent to the facility to take approximately 30% of the product to retail There are a couple of other very good reasons to continue using Synagro: • Synagro marketed over 800,000 yards of manure and biosolids based compost last year, and the South Kern facility will provide the product necessary to meet that growing demand • Synagro will provide the District with backhauls of compost, at the District's request • Synagro has back-up options available in California, Arizona and beyond, should there be any down time at the South Kem Facility I have no doubt that this facility is the answer to the biosolids dilemma for Southern and Central California. The only challenge is that the CUP will expire if not vested before October 2004. In order to vest the CUP, we must begin construction and in order to begin construction we must close escrow — which requires Synagro to have commitments in hand to support the financing. This is a long way of saying that time is of the essence in completing a contract if you are interested in the option. I am aware of several options being touted which are either not proven or are speculative (no permitting in place). If I have learned anything in dealing with Riverside County over the years, it is that permits to operate a biosolids processing facility are not easily obtained. Thus it is important to Synagro (and presumably to the industry) to see that this facility is successful. We have run the mileage (which we will handle through our internal tracking company), and the all-in price for services will be $49.00 per ton (plus annual CPI increases). This is in today's dollars based on an 800 ton per day design, and the facility will likely open in January 2006. This number is subject to change if we are unable to secure 800 tons per day of biosolids. As you know, in order to finance the project, we need long term commitments. While we would prefer a 20 year contract, we need at least a 10 year deal with two 5 year extensions. While I know this may sound like quite a jump in price and commitment, I believe that as options are eliminated and regulations increase, you will be glad that you have a secure price for long term services. n n n.,_om7 . r, nn> . re_ 91718 • 909.277.2662 • Fax 909.277,2960 e I have enclosed our Joint Technical Document, along with a Project Summary. These documents and their attachments thoroughly describe the project and should answer any design questions you may have. We value our long-standing relationship with OCSD and we hope that we will be able to continue serving your residuals management needs. If you would like for me to meet with your Board or staff relative to this proposal, please do not hesitate to call me at (909) 369-5056. V tmly yours, Eliza Os[oi � Pro' evelopment P.O.Box 7027 • Corona • CA 91718 •909.277.2662 • Fax 909.2772960 OTETRA TECH, INC. March 22, 2004 Layne Baroldi,Senior Regulatory Specialist Orange County Sanitation District P.O.Box 8127 Fontana Valley,CA 92728-8127 Reference: Assessment of Synagro Proposal for South Kern Industrial Center Composting Dear Layne Baroldi: The Orange County Sanitation District requested that Tetra Tech assess the information available for the Synagro proposed composting facility in South Kern County. In confidence,as you requested, we reviewed the information supplied. For the subject project, the construction capital for the project appears reasonable for the size and scope of the facility. The information supplied by Synagro as to the technical design and features of the project are reasonable and align with industry norms for ASP composting. As is often the case, there are minor differences in a variety of factors or design criteria for the project between Synagro's approach and how our team might complete such a project. These differences do not appear to be significant or to be of sufficient concern to cause fatal flaws in the project. For the project to successfully proceed and be sustainable it is imperative that Synagro achieve the minimum tonnage in order to obtain the economies of scale they are targeting. We recommend you closely monitor Synagro's progress in arranging other major biosolids supply contracts and in your agreement with Synagro allow for the OCSD to escape in a reasonable amount of time if Synagro does not complete the rest of the project biosolids deliveries or other key criteria. Overall, the project appears sound and a good value for the District in comparison to other projects and alternatives available to the District. We recommend that OCSD proceed with the Synagro South Kern Industrial Center Composting proposal. Respectfully, Charles Egigian-Nichols Senior Manager CEN:cab 1:U771\00334etteraV-005..4 c Mike Hoover Fred Somushian 3475 East FmthUl Boulevard Suite 300,Pasadena.CA 91107 Te1626.351.4664 Fax626.693.0060 www.tMmtecM1.cam DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Thursday, April 8, 2004, at 3:30 p.m. A meeting of the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on Thursday, April 8, 2004, at 3:30 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) ROLL CALL The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: PDC COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager Brian Donahue, Chair David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Alice Jempsa, Vice Chair John Linder, Construction Manager Patty Campbell Chris Cervellone, Construction Supervisor John Collins Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager Alberta Christy Matt Smith, Acting Engineering Manager Norm Eckenrode Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager Beth Krom Kathy Miles, Project Engineer Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Jean Tappan, Committee Secretary Steve Anderson, Board Vice Chair OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Absent: None Patsy Marshall (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM No appointment was necessary. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Committee Chair Brian Donahue did not make a report. (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson did not make a report. PDC Committee Minutes ° Page 2 April 8, 2004 (6) REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director of Engineering David Ludwin provided an update on the GW RS advanced water treatment bids that came in $38 million over the engineer's estimate. The GW RS Steering Committee will be considering increasing the budget and the award of a contract at its April 12 meeting. If the actions are approved, they will be submitted to the District's Board at its April 28 meeting. Jennifer Cabral reported that an early notification letter on the connection fee increase on April 1, which was sent to residents in the area of construction of the new sewer line in Tustin, resulted in 38 permit applications. The usual number of permit applications for the same time period is 13-15. (7) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel was not present. (8) CONSENT CALENDAR(hems a-i) a. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive, file, and approve draft minutes of the March 4, 2004 Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting. g. PDC04.29 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to accept Short Term Ocean Duffel Bacteria Reduction, Job No.J-87,as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. h. PDC04-30 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No.2 to Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22,with ARB, Inc., authorizing an addition of$182,109, and time extension of 23 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$5,424,149. i. PDC04-31 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to ratify Change Order No. 7 to Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2,Job No.J-35-2, with J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of$194,205, increasing the total contract amount to$15,283,121. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. There were no items deleted. PDC Committee Minutes Page 3 April 8, 2004 (9) INFORMATIONAL ITEM (Item a) a. PDC04-32 Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for Treatment Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement Project, Job No. P2-66. Jim Herberg explained the need for the additional CEOA documentation for this project. (10) ACTION ITEMS (Items a-) a. PDC04-33 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Amendment No. 7 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell, providing for additional engineering services for Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1- 37, for an additional amount of$992,957, increasing the total amount not to exceed$6,198,661. b. PDC04-34 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Amendment No.4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers, providing for additional engineering services for Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No.2, Job No. P2-60,for an additional amount of$171,786, Increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,393,671. C. PDC04-35 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates, providing for additional environmental services for Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report,Job No.J-40-5,for an additional amount of$141,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed$513,500. (11) CLOSED SESSION There was no closed session. (12) OTHER BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS, IF ANY Director Eckenrode said that he attended the SCAG meeting and they are working on problems in the Los Angeles and San Gabriel River watersheds. He suggested that the Santa Ana Watershed be included in their discussions. A tour of Plant 1 will be conducted before the May or June PDC Committee meeting, depending on the size of the agenda. The tour will begin at 5 p.m, followed by dinner and the regular meeting. PDC Committee Minutes Page 4 April 8, 2004 (13) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR WOULD LIKE STAFF TO REPORT ON AT A SUBSEQUENT MEETING There were none. (14) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (15) FUTURE MEETINGS DATES The next Planning, Design, and Construction Committee Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, May 6, 2004 at 5 p.m. (16) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 4:20 p.m. Submitted by: JeqqTappan PEV Committee Secretary H:WepNgenNWOL1tWGWGVIuglO pft PM Mln"S. ¢ PDC COMMITTEE Meeting Date To go.of dr. W08/04 04/28/04 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number PDC04-29 13(b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer SUBJECT: SHORT TERM OCEAN OUTFALL BACTERIA REDUCTION JOB NO. J-87 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Accept Short Term Ocean Outfall Bacteria Reduction, Job No. J-87, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement with J. F. Shea Construction, Inc. SUMMARY Background • Job No. J-87 provides for new Chemical Feed Facilities necessary to provide disinfection of the plant effluent at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. This project is required to comply with the District's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Ocean Discharge Permit. • Black& Veatch prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to J.F. Shea Construction Inc. on December 18, 2002. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date February 24, 2003 Original Contract Completion Date October 31, 2003 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 3 Current Contract Completion Date November 20, 2003 Actual Completion Date November 20, 2003 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0 Job Completion The project is now 100% complete. Pagel PRIOR COMMITTEEBOARD ACTIONS f The contract was awarded by the Board of Directors on December 18, 2002. Please refer to the attached Change Order Status Report for information on all previous Change Orders. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 4,298,247 Previously Authorized Changes $ 97,102 This Change (add) N/A Change Orders to Date $ 97,102 Percentage Increase to Date 2.26% Amended Contract Price $ 4,395,349 BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section a- Page 74) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) There is no change in the project budget. Please refer to the Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None ALTERNATIVES None CEOA FINDINGS This project was included in the Strategic Plan EIR that was certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report CH:dm KMtglob Mgenda Dmft RepoMTDCVA7 AR Om-Out 040104.Wc Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE SHORT TERM OCF OUT L BACTERIA REDUCTION JOB NO.J-87 grocasm NIE Ta PPOW�O Esmnm CFDIERNMLSE gVlIWI�D g4VEti pEBF E PEV6m - PYTXOP®i0 NRIIOR6AM14 TOfK QPBISIVPE YWA BVDYi hEUiFISB WDOET. . DAR PEWk9f RYIPDIRI�lIW1 TDDLiE : E-o�- s f s s �asaW �WAe. s s s sansW s m s wm.s- ais,, s I 86 s rose s a uo.EW s �Wsg e-d..u. s s s s >a® s m t - s smrsa - s smraa s - s aanme s +gW.6W r�e..Ws.rm s s+a® s s uWss �� s e.ona. s s wn.Ee s nA<om[tl s .nm s ms.�a s W s vsq� s .mszn s .msw s s ® :.. s s rims s CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT SHORT TERM OCEAN OUTFALL BACTERIA REDUCTION JOB NO.J-RT APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COBT PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTNORDEDTIM REM DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TO DATE (CunwlMlvA) (DAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 1VIS $4,298,247 $4298,247 0.W 2W 250 CO NO.V 1N2 WO (E98,081) $4,20,iW (2.30) 20 270 CO NO.2 12'172003 W1,5W $4.231.7Q (1.55) 0 270 CO NO,3 3242004 $10.W7 $4.395,349 225 0 270 '".WGLCCmmmIYea Pn6vHWIo4nKIMIYMPw�4 PafIXutiari 9333 PDC COMMITTEE r4eebue Dare To Bd.or Dir. 04/08/04 4/28/04 + AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Item Number PDC04-3D 13M Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Hardat Khublall, Engineer SUBJECT: WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-22 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 2 to Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No.11-22, with ARB, Inc., authorizing an addition of$182,109, and time extension of 23 calendar days, increasing the total contract amount to$5,424,149. SUMMARY Background • This project, located in the City of Huntington Beach, consists of improvements to relieve hydraulic deficiencies on two separate reaches of the existing Warner Avenue Relief Sewer and to relieve deficiencies in the overall drainage basin tributary to that trunk sewer. The 1999 Strategic Plan identified these two reaches of the Wamer Avenue Relief Sewer as hydraulically deficient and in need of replacement. • Tetra Tech, Inc. prepared the plans and specifications and the construction contract was awarded to ARB, Inc. on May 28, 2003. • Change Order No. 2 includes ten items of added work to Contract No. 11-22. There are no errors or omissions associated with this Change Order. The contract includes liquidated damages of$750 per day and no bonus provisions. Contract Schedule Contract start date July 9, 2003 Original contract completion date September 2, 2004 Total number of change orders to date 2 Current contract completion date September 12, 2004 Revised completion date October 5, 2004 Days subject to liquidated damages WA Liquidated damages assessment WA Page 1 Change Order No. 2 Content f Item No. Description Amount Days Type 1 Potholing for Revised $5 796 0 Design Change Alignment 2 Excavate, Recompact, and 0 Design Change Pave Pothole Locations for 10,006 Old Alignment 3 Pothole Bore and Receiving 2,228 0 Changed Pit Locations Conditions 4 Removal of Abandoned 24- 4,568 0 Changed inch Irrigation Line Condition 5 Secure Water Leak from 18- Changed inch Abandoned Irrigation 6,367 0 Condition Line 6 Rehabilitation Work at 20,700 0 Other Manhole No. 1 on Los Patos 7 Temporary Paving at Graham 2 330 0 Other and Warner 8 Pilot Bores at Wintersburg 9,614 0 Changed Channel CrossingCondition 9 Standby Time for Boring 62,500 11 Changed O eration Condition 10 Re-direction of 30-inch Steel 58,000 12 Changed CasingCondition Total—Change Order No. 2 1 $182,109 23 For Item Nos. 8, 9, and 10, reference Additional Information section for summary information. Job Completion The contract is now 55% complete. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS Change Order No. 1 was approved by the Planning, Design, and Construction Committee on November 19, 2003, for an amount not to exceed $153,000. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 5,089,040 Previously Authorized Change Order No. 1 $ 153,000 This Change Order(Add) $ 182,109 Change Orders to Date $ 335,109 Percent Increase to Date 6.580% Amended Contract Price $ 5,424,149 Page 2 Authorization of$182,109 is being requested to fund Change Order No. 2. In addition, $202,875 is being reallocated from Phase 7 (Contingency) to Phases 2, 3, and 4 to properly account for project costs. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (tine item: FY 03104, Section 8, Page 40,Capital Improvement Program,Collections Facilities,Warner Avenue Relief Sewer,Contract No. 11-22) ❑ This Rem has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Bid Item No. 12 for this contract required the Contractor to jack and bore a 56-inch diameter steel casing for approximately 239 feet under the Wintersburg Channel, including the installation of two separate carrier pipes (siphons). Change Order Items 8, 9, and 10 are all associated with the above bid Rem scope of work. The bridge as-built drawings and survey data reviewed by the District's Design Consultant during design indicated that there was a probability that a jack and bore operation would be successful in crossing through the spacing provided between the bridge piles. In the field, it was visually obvious that the spacing of the interior bridge piles were adjusted to miss the City's existing 21-inch sewer siphon. Staff elected to follow the existing City sewer alignment, but to go approximately 6-feet deeper. During design, Staff considered the low risk option of boring within new easements, either to the north or south of the bridge. However, the City wanted the project to be completed as soon as possible and prior to the start of the City of Huntington Beach's federal paving project on Warner. In an attempt to secure additional information on pile spacing and to minimize risk, Staff directed the Contractor to bore small holes under the channel (see Change Order Item No. 8 for details). The data from three pilot holes indicated that there was a good chance that a smaller 30-inch steel casing could be jacked through the last row of piling. Therefore, Staff restarted the jack and bore utilizing a 30-inch casing, and was successful all the way up to the fourth row of piling, at which time the Contractor hit another bridge pile. The Contractor has now been directed by Staff to install a temporary operating solution. This involves reconnecting and slip lining the existing City of Huntington Beach 21-inch siphon under the bridge, and making a connection to the existing OCSD 21-inch siphon north of the bridge. The District's design consultant is now developing solutions for a new permanent siphon. Staff was presented a number of preliminary alignment alternatives for evaluation. Page 3 The new alignment being considered should eliminate the need to implement the = majority of Change Order No. 1, Downstream Siphon Modifications ($153,000) which was authorized at the November 19, 2003 Planning, Design, and Construction Meeting. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Location and Photo Description of Change Order No.2 HK:BP:eh:lc:jo:ba:lc HvdglobarAgeeda D1afl RepodeWDLU 1-22 AR 00a2 040104.doc Page 4 s BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER CONTRACT NO.11-22 MI.. P.... PNm9 TNIP PPOPo9EP fLryMAiCD. mmfmmnn+f Avrlw3mm vimlem m�e EVIro DAn nurx mimPvnlwx rmu exPvmmi - PPpOR xpf[P1106 OVWEi DAEE A NLV[ST AVMWRATO TOOPie� PAW I MDn. 3 N«s.v,Vimlm CN mQtl 3 2m apU 3 s 2w s 4AW s x] 3 xo MO s s s OD s 70m 3 nP.3es rsena zw.e» 3 &.7K w s 62ael. s vn..srammmmmw Pw s swore.clo..Da nam 3 s P«xTCxY s me. xnox s vwemrmx s a.xnxo s s ew.mo e.e1e»s s ze3.�w a r.wane s e.Pn.we P.MCUWMCwO MOIBLTxrt t 4,211.11 2«D.wO s s s w s zglw s aPxx,m s .wnws ves s ma» s» s «os» m a» s UNMgn WtlM 3 e... sw.Ow 3 1@.1 aex.«x 11 s 6.. 1C.1w Aw�« a t CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER CONTRACT No.11-22 APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE AOTNOIi�p AUTNOR® ITEM PATE COST TO DATE INCREASE TIME TIMETOVcO�ATE (GAYS) (DAYS) CONTRACT 7IW10W SS.OB 1m E5,089.000 420 a20 COMO.I- lllIW2W3 i166A66 E$.2A2.000 3.01 10 aw WN0..2 .Ra1419 -r82,fOS - $.42a.la6 6b 23 <9 'ypwwgR)C Cm.ndewasquuucvlX W emanaanmesa 1 Page 1 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: ARB, INC. C.O. No.: Two 2 Date: Aonl 28, 2004 Job: WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-22 Consultant: TETRA TECH, INC. Amount of this Change Order(Add) $182,109.00 In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 —POTHOLING FOR REVISED ALIGNMENT This item is for labor, equipment and material required to pothole nineteen locations for the revised 21- inch VCP alignment on Warner Avenue, between Boise Chica and Greentree. During potholing for the original design alignment, it was determined there was insufficient clearance from the City of Huntington Beach's 8-inch sewer line running parallel to the District's trench. At several locations,the District's new 21-inch VCP line could not maintain the public health code separation requirements from a city 8-inch water line. Therefore, staff elected to re-design and move the 21-inch sewer line to the north to maintain Health Code clearances. This work was accomplished by contractors force account pursuant to section 44.13.2 of the General Requirements. (Reference FCO No.002) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,796.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - EXCAVATE, RECOMPACT, AND PAVE POTHOLE LOCATIONS FOR OLD ALIGNMENT. This item is for labor, equipment and material required to excavate, recompact and base pave thirty one pothole shes along the original design alignment on Warner Avenue, between Greentree to Boise Chica (Station Nos. 49+00 to 66+40). The District changed the alignment from the outside number 3 lane to the middle number 2 lane,which left these old pothole locations filled with temporary paving material, and these holes were loosely compacted. The original contract scope would have required the contractor to excavate, compact, and base pave over the trench zone. Therefore,contractor restored these street sites in-kind to the City of Huntington Beaches satisfaction. This work was accomplished by contractors force account pursuant to Section 44.13.2 of the General Requirements. (Reference FCO No. 004) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 10,006.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 7 r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. ARB. INC. C.O. No.: Two 2 Date: April 28.2004 Job: WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER CONTRACT NO. 11-22 Consultant: TETRA TECH, INC. ITEM 3—POTHOLE BORE AND RECEIVING PIT LOCATIONS This item is for labor, equipment and materials required to pothole and locate a Southern Califomia Edison (SCE) power line that extended through the bore and receiving pits at the Wintersburg Channel Crossing. The extra work consisted of potholing and locating the alignment and depth of these lines. This power line was not accurately marked on the contract drawings, and impacted the shoring scope for both pits. Staff arranged and coordinated their relocation with Southern California Edison (SCE). This work was accomplished by contractors force account pursuant to Section 44.13.2 of the General Requirements. (Reference FCO No. 005) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2228.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4—REMOVAL OF ABANDONED 24-INCH IRRIGATION LINE This item is for labor, equipment and material required to remove an abandoned and leaking 24-inch irrigation line that encroached into the area where Junction Structure Number 27 was to be constructed (Station No. 90+08). This line was not disclosed on the contract documents. The contractors extra work consisted of tracing and locating the leak, cutting the line, and excavating and placing a concrete plug 20-feet to the east of the structure. This work was accomplished by contractors force account pursuant to section 44.6.2 of the General Requirements. (Reference FCO No. 003) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,568.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5—SECURE WATER LEAK FROM 18-INCH ABANDONED IRRIGATION LINE This Rem is for labor, equipment and material required to secure a leak from an abandoned and undisclosed 18-inch city irrigation line. Contractor was unable to keep his receiving and bore pit dry, which was located on each side of the W intersburg Channel;therefore he was required to investigate the source of the water draining into the pits. The extra work consisted of excavating at four separate locations between stations Nos. 93+00 to 95+00 and placing concrete plugs in the line on each side of the channel. This work was accomplished by contractors force account pursuant to section 44.8.2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO No. 010) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,367.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days I Page 3 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: ARB. INC. C.O. No.: Two 2 Date: APH128. 2004 Job: WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-22 Consultant: TETRA TECH, INC. ITEM 6—REHABILITATION WORK AT MANHOLE NO. 1 ON LOS PATOS This item Is for labor, equipment and material required to build a new manhole located at Los Palos and Marina View(Station No. 9+63). This manhole connects to the City of Huntington Beach's existing 12-Inch force main and is exposed to high hydrogen sulfide gases. The contract scope of work required that this manhole was to be only rehabilitated (e.g., new cone, shaft to be relined, etc.), but after the base was exposed, it was found to be badly deteriorated. In addition, during construction, the City informed staff that they will be Installing a new 14-inch force main sometime in 2004 that will tie Into this manhole. Therefore, Staff elected to design and build a new manhole approximately 10- feet to the West of the existing manhole,connecting to the existing 12-inch force main, and providing a 14-Inch force main stub out for the Clty's future force main. The City of Huntington Beach agreed to participate In this change order hem by contributing $10,000 towards the total cost of this item (Reimbursement Agreement has been prepared). This Item was negotiated with the contractor and the City pursuant to Section 44.B.2 of the General Requirements. (Reference FCO No. 006) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 20,700.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 7—TEMPORARY PAVING AT GRAHAM AND WARNER This Item is for labor, equipment and material required to place temporary paving material to the North and South of the newly constructed triple barrel box structure, located at the intersection of Graham and Warner. Staff directed the contractor to build up a temporary ramp on each side of the box for public safety reasons and to mitigate public complaints about the quality of their ride through the intersection. The work consisted of placing approximately 15.2 tons of asphalt adjacent to the box structure. This work was accomplished by contractors force account pursuant to section 44.B.2 of the General Requirements. (Reference FCO No. 007) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,330.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 7 t ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: ARB, INC. C.O. No.: Two 2 Date: Al Job: WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-22 Consultant: TETRA TECH INC. ITEM 8— PILOT BORES AT WINTERSBURG CHANNEL CROSSING This Rem is for labor, equipment and material required to bore three pilot holes from the bore pit through the existing 48-Inch steel casing towards the receiving ph on the eastside of the W intersburg Channel. Staff instructed the contractor to bore these pilot holes to determine the interference with piles under the bridge and the available spacing between piles. This data was used to determine the risk and feasibility of jacking a 30-inch steel casing across the channel. The contractor's boring subcontractor was required to remove the existing bore machine and place a smaller boring machine in the bore pit to drill approximately 1 'h inch holes in the horizontal direction under the channel. This work was accomplished by contractor's force account pursuant to section 44.B.2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO No. 009) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,614.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 9—STANDBY TIME FOR BORING OPERATION This Rem is for standby time incurred by the contractor during the boring operation across the Wintersburg Channel. The 48-inch steel casing that was being jacked from the bore pit(located west of the channel) in an easterly direction, encroached on a bridge pile (at the west abutment, 35 feet from the bore pit). The contractor and his boring subcontractor were at an impasse until the District evaluated all available options, and the City of Huntington Beach provided their feedback(City facility). Staff subsequently elected to restart the bore with a smaller 30-inch steel casing placed inside the previously jacked 48-inch steel casing. The boring subcontractor was successful in jacking the 30- inch casing for approximately 140 feet from the bore pit, but once again,the casing hit another bridge pile at the bridge's fourth row of piles. At each obstruction, all resources associated with the bore operation were placed in a standby mode. The contractor's extra work consisted of the down time of all labor, equipment and material assigned to the bore activity. The standby days totaled 17 days. This work was accomplished by contractor's force account pursuant to section 44.B.2 of the General Requirements(Reference FCO No. 008) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 62,500.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 11 Calendar Days t Page 5 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: ARB. INC. C.O. No.: Two 2 Date: Aori128. 2004 Job: WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-22 Consultant: TETRA TECH, INC. ITEM 10—REDIRECTION OF 30-INCH STEEL CASING This Item is for labor, equipment and materials required to redirect and reinforce 140-feet of 30-inch steel casing that was installed under the Wlntersburg Channel. Initially,the contractor started the jack and bore operation from the bore pit, located just west of the Wintersburg Channel crossing on Warner Avenue, with a 48-Inch steel casing. After about 35 feet into the bore operation,the 48-inch steel casing hit one of the bridge's abutment piles at station no.92+14.90. Subsequently, staff evaluated all available options and elected to proceed with jacking a smaller 30-inch steel casing. Approximately 140 feet Into the bore,the contractor hit another bridge pile (fourth row of piles). Staff elected to redirect the 30-inch steel casing,which involved pulling the casing back, reinforcing the casing by back welding the Joints, and Installing a wedge into the first joint of the casing,etc. Sometime during the pulling back the casing sequence,the channel bottom collapsed at the end of the casing, forcing channel water back through the casing, and flooding the bore pit. During this operation,the boring subcontractor incurred standby costs for his bore train equipment(crane, augers, bore machine, etc.)and salvage costs. This work was accomplished by contractor's force account pursuant to section 44.B.2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO No. 011) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 58,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 12 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 182,109.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 23 Calendar Days Page 6 of 7 0 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: ARB, INC. C.O. No.: Two 2 Date: April 28, 2004 Job: WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-22 Consultant: TETRA TECH, INC. The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously Issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that an extension of 23 calendar days time to perform the work is required for this Change Order. District and Contractor agreed that the added costs described above constitutes full and equitable consideration for all the impacts incurred by the Contractor, and no other direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: July 9, 2003 Original Contract Time: 420 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: September 2,2004 Time Extension this C.O.: 23 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 33 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 453 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 5, 2004 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A Actual Final Completion Date: Original Contract Price $ 5,089,040.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 153,000.00 This Change (Add)(Deduet) $ 182 109.00 Amended Contract Price $ 5424,149.00 Page 7 of 7 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: ARB, INC. C.O. No.: Two 2 Date: April 28, 2004 Job: WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-22 Consultant: TETRA TECH, INC. Board Authorization Date: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John D. Linder, P.E Date Construction Manager Approved by: David A. Ludwin, P.E. Date Director of Engineering Accepted by: Contractor Date EOM5:008784815 Meeting Date To 9tl.W Dir. PDC COMMITTEE 1 as/08/aa oaizeioa C AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Item Number PDC04-31 13(d) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Julian Sabri, Project Manager SUBJECT: AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-35-2 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Ratify Change Order No. 7 to Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2, with J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of $194,205, increasing the total contract amount to $15,283,121. SUMMARY Background • This project implements a study of Plant Nos. 1 and 2 to comply with the National Electrical Code (NEC) by utilizing NFPA 820 Standard. The work includes modification of ventilation systems to meet the code requirements, replacement or modification of electrical systems, installation of a fire alarm system in the tunnels, and replacemenUrelocation of digester and natural gas piping. • The plans and specifications were prepared by Parsons/Lee & Ro, and the contract was awarded to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., on June 26, 2002. • Change Order No. 7 includes five items of added work. There are no errors and three omissions associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $3,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions. Contract Schedule Contract Start Date September 16, 2002 Original Contract Completion Date June 17, 2005 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 7 Current Contract Completion Date June 17, 2005 Actual Completion Date N/A Days Subject to Liquidated Damages N/A Page 1 r Chance Order No. 7 Content Item Description Amount Type No. Days 1 Electrical Additions at Plant No. 1 $4,462 0 Changed Conditions 2 Electrical Modifications at Plant No. 1 $127,177 0 Omission/Design Change 3 Electrical Additions at Plant No. 2 $20,166 0 Omission 4 Mechanical Additions at Plant No. 2 $ 14,927 0 Design Change 5 Structural Modifications at Plant No. 2 $ 27,473 0 1 Omission Total Change Order No. 7 $194,205 1 0 Item 2 includes various modifications throughout the treatment facilities at Plant No. 1. The majority of the costs in this item are associated with a design change recommended by Staff. This change replaces the deteriorated lighting systems inside primary basins 3, 4 and 5 which were not specified to be modified. Many of the other modifications included in this item are omissions on the contract documents. See "Additional Information"for more details. Job Completion This project is 68% complete. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS The contract was awarded by the Board of Directors on June 26, 2002. Please refer to the attached Change Order Status Report for information on all previous change orders. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Original Contract Price $ 14,066,442 Previously Authorized Changes $ 1,022,474 This Change $ 194,205 Change Orders to Date $ 1,216,679 Percentage Increase to Date 8.65% Final Contract Price $ 15,283,121 BUDGETIMPACT ® This Rem has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) Page 2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This project includes extensive rehabilitation of existing electrical and ventilation systems within both plants. The areas involving work include all of the digesters, many of the underground tunnels, and several electrical and support buildings. There were over 800 contract drawings and two volumes of specifications included in the contract documents. The design consultant was diligent in completing the project tasks, but with all rehabilitation jobs many unknowns are encountered. This typically results in a higher project change order percentage. This project's change order percentage is currently 8.65%and the project is 68% complete. Staff estimates the total change order percentage on this job will be approximately 12%. ALTERNATIVES None CEQA FINDINGS This project is categorically exempt from CEQA requirements ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Location and Photo Description of Change Order GLH:dm:eh H:\MglobaMgenda Draft Repods\PDCW-35 2 AR COX]0901NAm Page 3 tl BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE AREA CLASSIFICATION STOGY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PLANE NOS.1 A Y JOB NO.J45S2 wuona{ wanwr a"OOOBE° vnovnaA num rwv mawsm {mneamP. FNNmfRNABE amxa�n vxaLLT JPYi IIEVC+® 4VIXPI�Pro Y.rtxoianmx '. imu - avvmm.vp Dawn Damn vi9zFA� vuv��r are xmu¢r avzxoxmnox rowre { N...z.� vb..s.w YpJ10.T TmaL { A.NS.® i t�.n,w f { t SIM)t�P { .NV f TA.T6 { 171�]]n R..r4e..L.Csv ]I01[CSeQf { A]n,® i S�n0.W { ] ]�.itvL t S�SnS] i �nYA i ]I n�)16 { niti�lx MAMnn CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT Area Classification SWOy Implementation Plan,Plants 1 and 2 JOB NO.J-35.2 APPROVAL Cfwrrlf CT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE ADTNORUXD AOTHORD£D TIME TIME DATE Rd DATE COST TODATE INCREASE (DAYS) T(DAYS) CONYRAC7 SwIlt 2 S14,0$6,442A0 S14A96AaM 0.00% 1006 1006 CONO.1- M"01,03 $115240.00 514,191,722.00 0.821c 0 1006 CONO.2 SO 01,03 EB3195.00 5142 .917.00 1.51% 0 1006 CON0.3 WM.03 52693a5.00 S1< 262A0 3.33% 0 1006 CO NO.4 Noe 19 03 S197.090.00 516.T31.356.00 5.] 0 1006 CON0.5 F9025,21 S21a.95t.00 51a.916.31 D.00 626% 0 1006 CO NO.6 MN2009 5142,606.00 S15.OBB,916.00 T.2P.c 0 1006 COW.7 195 .W 1 $19 Izm 1 ELM - 0 1006 'Approved by PDC Comm9lee per a91e9aIBa au nonly 0y Board Amin ion 99-23 Page 1 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seven 7 Date: April 28, 2004 Job: Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2. Job No.J-35-2 Consultant: Parson/Lee & Ro Amount of this Change Order(Add) (Dedest) $194.205.00 In accordance with contract provisions,the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM -1 ELECTRICAL ADDITIONS AT PLANT NO. 1 Quanti Cost Reference a) Install 3 thermowells in the Gas Compressor building basement gas piping. 1 $1,683 FCO No. 113 b) Additional Contractor labor to investigate conduit size, routing and wires for 31 conduits at Digesters 7 and 8 to determine where to install specified conduit seals for these conduits. 1 $2,779 FCO No.179 Item a, the thennowells are needed to allow removal of thermocouples from the gas line during maintenance to eliminate the need for shutting down gas lines and also to meet electrical code for the classified area. As-built drawings did not show the existing thermocouples were installed without therrnowells. Item b,this work was needed because existing as-built drawings did not show the actual number of wires in conduits and routing of wires. This additional work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 43 (S) (1) of the General Requirements, Division 01. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,462.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seven 7 Date: April 28,2004 Job: Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No.J-35-2 Consultant: Parson/Lee& Ro ITEM-2 ELECTRICAL MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1 uant Cost Reference a) At primary clarifiers 1 and 2 install 26 conduit seals, 1,000 feet of #12 and#14 wire, 1 explosion proof electrical panel, relocate 200 feet of conduit, and replace various relay and light switches with explosion proof switches. 1 $35,935 FCO No.27 b) Verify number of wires in each of 23 conduits in metering and diversion structure feeding electric gate operators. Install 36 seals along with miscellaneous conduit fittings. 1 $11,930 FCO No. 56 c) Inside primary clarifiers 3, 4, and 5, replace all deteriorated or unclassified electrical fixtures, lights, conduits, and conductors with explosion proof materials. Equipment replaced included 3 PA speakers, 3 door switches, 3 amber lights, 3 emergency homs, 3 start/stop stations, 6 explosion proof lights,650 It 3/4-inch conduit, 100 If of 1-1/2 inch conduit and 1,500 It of#10 and#12 wire. 1 $59,245 FCO No. 80 d) In the head works Influent Pump Room basement, replace 4 receptacles with explosion proof receptacles and seal four 1-inch and one 3A-inch conduits for pump room fans. 1 $5,786 FCO No. 196 e) In Gas Compressor building basement replace existing 10-inch HPDG flow meter with new 10-inch mass flow meter and also replace existing 2-inch HPDG heat exchanger cooling water flow meter with a new 2-inch magmeter. 2 $14,281 FCO No. 112 Items a-d, these items were needed because contract drawings either did not include this work or did not provide sufficient information needed for Contractor to complete work to meet NFPA code requirements for the structures. Item e, the contract drawings and specifications did not recognize that the existing flow meters were not compatible with required new explosion proof transmitters. This additional work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 43(B) (1) of the General Requirements, Division 01. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $127,177.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 3 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seven 7 Date: April 28, 2004 Job: Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2. Job No. J-35-2 Consultant: Parson/Lee & Ro ITEM - 3 ELECTRICAL ADDITIONS AT PLANT NO. 2 Quant" Cost Reference a) Install 8 new lights, 280 It of 3'4-inch conduit, 1,150 it of#12 wire, install light switches and photocell off/on sensors, core drill for 8 condults through concrete floors,for new covered entries at Digesters CID, FIG, W, and R/S. 1 $20,166 FCO No. 164 This work was not included in the contract drawings but is needed for safe egress into and out of the pump rooms at night. This additional work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 43 (B) (1) of the General Requirements, Division 01 ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $20,166.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM -4 MECHANICAL ADDITIONS AT PLANT NO. 2 This item includes adding one 10-inch butterfly valve on Gas Compressor(GC) basement stainless steel HPDG line, removing and relocating a set of 10-inch carbon steel flanges on the 10-inch HPDG line in the GC basement, and installing two temporary pipe blind flanges on the 10-inch HPDG line at Bereton and Lindstrom tunnels. With this work the District was able to utilize the existing 6-inch gas flare line to supply Digesters gas to the CEN-GEN building for the 3 week period that the 10-inch HPDG line was out of service during installation of new condensate drains. This work eliminated the District flaring all the Plant No. 2 digester gas during this 3 week line shutdown and purchasing additional natural gas to power the CEN GEN building. This additional work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 43(B) (1)of the General Requirements, Division 01. (Reference FCO No. 237). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $14,927.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seven 7 Date: APH128.2004 Job: Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2. Job No. J-35-2 Consultant: Parson/Lee 8 Ro ITEM -5 STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO.2 Quan Cost Reference a) This item includes modifying the stainless steel canopy roofing,support beams and wall attachment details for connecting the specified canopy to digester wall and pump room wall at Digester K. Work Includes adding approximately 22 feet of 3-inch Stainless steel plate, approximately 200 feet of welds to provide a gas tight seal for the canopy and relocating 50 feet of 1-inch water line at the canopy. 1 $19,494 FCO No. 50 b) Work included providing concrete closure in digester pump room roof and installing new fan roof curb for sealing existing square roof fan opening with new round fan duct on Digesters P/Q, R/S and T pump room roofs. 3 $7,979 FCO No. 192 Item a,these modifications were necessitated by the complexity of installing the canopy in an area with numerous existing pipes,valves, and electrical fixtures in or passing through the canopy structure and the problem of providing a gas tight seal between the round walls of the digester and the new rectangular canopy. Item b, this work was required to provide a water tight roof where the new round ducts penetrate existing roofs. The contract drawings did not provide details for sealing the roof at these fan locations. In this area small round ducts pass through larger square openings at locations where existing tans were removed. This additional work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 43(B) (1) of the General Requirements, Division 01. ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $27,473.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $194,205.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 5 of 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seven Date: April 28, 2004 Job: Area Classification Studv Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2.Job No.J-35.2 Consultant: Parson/Lee & Ro The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously Issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or Indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: September 16,2002 Original Contract Time: 1006 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: June 17,2005 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 0 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 14,066,442.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 1,022,474.00 This Change(Add) (Deduet) $ 194,205.00 Amended Contract Price $ 15,283,121.00 i l Page 6 of 6 ° ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Seven 7 Date: April 28,2004 Job: Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2.Job No.J-35-2 Consultant: Parson/Lee & Ro Board Authorization Date: April 28,2004 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Recommended by: John D. Linder, P.E. Date Construction Manager Approved by: David A. Ludwin P.E. Date Director of Engineering Accepted by: J.F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION, INC. Contractor Date EDM$W37WIS PDC COMMITTEE meeting Date To ad.of Dlr. 4/08/D4 4/28/04 AGENDA REPORT rtem Number Item Number PDC04-32 13(el Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: DRAFT SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT PROJECT, JOB NO. P2-66 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Information Only Item SUMMARY • Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Treatment Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement Project, Job No. 132-66, is being presented to the Planning, Design, and Construction (PDC) Committee, prior to consideration for adoption by the Orange County Sanitation District's (District) Board of Directors on April 28, 2004. A copy of the Draft Subsequent EIR was mailed to the District's Board of Directors on March 25, 2004. • The 1999 Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) included improvements to the existing headworks facilities. However, a subsequent engineering evaluation of the facility showed that it was more practical to construct a new headworks than to continue to upgrade the existing headworks after 40 years of expansions and modifications. • The proposed project would replace the existing Headworks at Plant No. 2 that currently receives wastewater flow from five major trunk sewers within the District's service area. The new Headworks facility would provide the point of entry for these trunk sewers, measuring their flow and providing preliminary treatment (grit and debris removal). The new Headworks would have 340 million gallons per day (mgd) peak wet weather flow capacity and would not increase the existing treatment capacity of Plant No. 2. • The proposed project would demolish and remove the existing Headworks, the sludge drying beds, two underground storage tanks, and a truck washing facility to make room for the new Headworks buildings. • The Project would require the construction of fifteen structures, eleven of which would be greater than 20 feet tall. The two tallest buildings would be approximately 56 feet. As part of the ancillary buildings, an odor control system would also be constructed adjacent to the main Headworks structure to utilize the new bio-tower scrubbing technology, followed by conventional treatment of chemical scrubbers, e:m,.+gdnd.a .,d., do eagd.edam n -d. 131a11.ee.1« A..:osodroa Page 1 • The Draft Subsequent EIR was released for public circulation in January 2004. The 45-day public review period was established as January 23 through March 9, 2004. The Draft Subsequent EIR was mailed to responsible agencies, organizations, and all individuals that expressed an interest in the project. Approximately 115 Draft Subsequent EIRs and 25 Notice of Availability letters were mailed. Additionally, the Notice of Availability, which directs the public to the District's website for viewing the Draft EIR, was advertised in the Orange County Register. • As of this writing, District staff has received six comment letters on the Draft EIR from the cities of Fullerton and Anaheim, the Southern California Association of Governments, Costa Mesa Sanitary District, Irvine Ranch Water District, and The Gas Company. The comment letters acknowledge the project, but do not raise environmental concerns about the project. In the event additional comments are received on the Draft or Final EIR, they will be reported at the District's Board of Directors meeting on April 28, 2004. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS N/A PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY This is an information only Item. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In May 2003, a Notice of Preparation (NOP)for Treatment Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement Project was circulated for public review. The NOP was mailed to responsible agencies, organizations, and all individuals that expressed an interest in the project. The NOP requested that interested parties respond within 30 days with written comments and concerns related to the proposed project. The NOP comment period was established as May 12 through June 12, 2003. Ten written comments were received. All written comments received were considered during the development of the Draft Subsequent EIR. Following the public comment period, District staff will compile written comments received on the Draft EIR and will prepare a "Response to Comments" document that together with the Draft EIR, will constitute the Final EIR. The Final EIR will be circulated for a 10-day public review period to those agencies/individuals who commented on the Draft Subsequent EIR. H beplNOandd9odtl noemo..po ..eomd 2,.nd.Arootib<avum 13(9)P2Bfld« A—.0 o 103 Page 2 v Prior to the April Board meeting, the Final EIR, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and proposed certification resolutions will be mailed to the District Board of Directors for review. The Final EIR is scheduled for certification by the District Board of Directors at the April 28, 2004 Board meeting, prior to project approval. ALTERNATIVES Providing the upgrades and repairs to the existing headworks, as described in the 1999 Strategic Plan, would not comply with current seismic and electrical codes or address the increased risk to worker safety hazards. The 40-year old facility would continue to be at increased risk of mechanical failure associated with the existing aging equipment. CEQA FINDINGS The upgrades and repairs to the existing headworks was mentioned in 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR. However, a Subsequent EIR is required to cover the complete replacement project. Since the Draft Subsequent EIR indicates that there are potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Headworks Replacement Project, mitigation measures have been proposed to minimize the identified impacts to a less than significant level. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has also been prepared for implementation of these measures. ATTACHMENT Figure 1-1, Proposed Headworks Site Plan AA:sa KWglobaPAgenda Draft Repolta\PDQP2-66 EIR Agenda Repod 040104.doc M VepMOanNlBnfrE!panda RePpM Ga.N A,nEu ReppbWMNum I]lel PA65.Erc Re ' ado q, Page 3 PDC COMMITTEE weetirig Dace Toed.o pr. 4108/04 4/28/09 AGENDA REPORT "P'""°n33 1b"nNuinbg PDC09-33 33(f) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Dave Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator. Dean Fisher, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 16-31 AND RELATED FACILITIES, JOB NO. P1-37 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 7 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell, providing for additional engineering services for Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, for an additional amount of$992,957, increasing the total amount not to exceed $6,198,861. SUMMARY • Job No. P1-37, Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, includes the construction of 16 new primary clarifiers with support equipment, improvements to the existing Primary Clarifiers 6-15, and improvements to Primary Clarifiers 1-5. • Brown and Caldwell prepared the plans and Specifications and the contract was awarded to Margate Construction on October 24, 2001. The project is approximately 70% complete with an estimated completion date of April 7, 2006. • Brown and Caldwell's current Scope of Work for this project includes $1,620,979 in construction support services. Services include reviewing contractor shop drawing submittals, attending project meetings as requested by Staff, providing commissioning services, preparing record documentation and deliverables such as O&M Manuals, record drawings, and a maintenance management database. The amount designated in Amendment No. 6 for this work will not be sufficient to complete the project. • The proposed amended PSA is 8.8% of the original construction contract and the portion devoted to the construction support services equates to 3.6%. This is compared to 18% and 5% used as budget targets in the District Capital Improvement Program (CIP). • Amendment No. 7 continues the services described above to project completion and also adds geotechnical engineering resources for inspection and review of the foundation support system under the existing clarifiers, startup, and commissioning support to provide technical guidance and testing procedures during facility initial operation, as well as engineering field review by the consultant during construction as requested by Staff. A proposal letter from Brown and Caldwell is attached indicating an amount of$992,957 to provide the level of effort necessary to complete the project. "%'^'� Page 1 PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS , Please refer to the attached Professional Service Agreement (PSA) Status Report for all previous General Manager, Committee, and Board actions. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of$992,957 is being requested under Phase 4—Construction. A budget reallocation of$992,957 from Phase 7—Contingency to Phase 4—Construction is also being requested. The total budget remains at $88,561,000. Please see the attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, CIR P1-37) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Background The Orange County Sanitation District's (District) Strategic Plan requires additional primary treatment capacity at Plant No. 1 and the project Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, was developed to meet this demand. In September 1998, a PSA for$1,933,000 was issued to Brown and Caldwell for preliminary design studies and design services. This project includes the design of 96-mgd of primary treatment facilities, and improvements to existing Primary Clarifiers 6-15. In January 1999, Brown and Caldwell submitted the Final Project Report, which included results of preliminary design studies which were conducted in an effort to optimize the operation and maintenance of all primary clarifiers and related facilities at Plant No. 1. Amendment No. 1, which was approved In April 1999, increased the contract amount $863,185, for a total PSA amount of$2,856,185. When the original PSA was approved, the Scope of Work included studies for optimizing the Plant No. 1 primary treatment process. Options that were found to be cost-effective in the studies were added to the design Scope of Work through Amendment No. 1. Amendment No. 2, which was approved in November 1999, increased the contract amount $21, 557, for a total PSA amount of $ 2,877,742. This additional work involved an investigation of high rate clarifiers located throughout Canada and Europe. w wa m Page 2 Amendment No. 3, which was approved in December 1999, increased the contract amount$189,537, for a total PSA amount of$3,067,279. As a result of the re-invention 4 efforts and foul air odor control studies conducted, Staff identified the additional design work that needed to be added to this job. Amendment No. 4, which was approved in August 2000, increased the contract amount $511,045, for a total PSA amount of$3,578,324. This additional work included design services necessary to add another control building, retrofit controls, add effluent monitoring equipment, install a pilot coagulation plant, provide CMMS work, and miscellaneous re-work. Amendment No. 5, which was approved in May 2001, increased the contract amount $24,783, for a total PSA amount of $3,603,107. This additional work included engineering services necessary to bring the final design submittal up to current standards and to provide design changes recommended by Staff. Amendment No. 6, which was approved in February 2002, increased the contract amount$1,602,797, for a total PSA amount of$5,205,904. This Amendment provided construction support services for the designed project. Amendment No. 7 During the course of construction, it has become apparent that the original estimate for the design engineering resources required to support the construction project document review was insufficient. In addition, the complexity of the project necessitates that the design engineer have Staff part time on site to review the construction work and provide engineering review in order to provide timely direction demanded by the contractor and construction managers. Amendment No. 7 addresses these issues by adding funds for resources to review project documentation including Requests for Information (RFIs), submittals and contractor cost proposals, and providing resources for on-site engineering services. Amendment No. 7 also adds geotechnical engineering services and initial startup/operation services. The geotechnical services are needed for grout-injected foundation piles under the existing structure, including assistance with the engineering review and inspection of this specialty work which District staff has limited experience with. The geotechnical services provided in Amendment No. 6 were used for concrete pile inspection resources during the Phase 1 portion of the project. The additional startup services are provided to assist with a smooth transition to facility operation and commissioning activities. The total amount of the PSA, as well as the portion of this devoted to construction support services inclusive of Amendment No. 7, is significantly below the anticipated and budgeted cost for similar projects. The amended PSA is 8.8% of the original construction contract and the portion devoted to the construction support services equates to 3.6%. This is compared to 18% and 5°/6 used as budget targets in the District Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Awe°: ^ Page 3 Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 7, which provides for additional construction support services, increasing the contract amount$992,957, for a total amount not to exceed $6,198,861. ALTERNATIVES None. CEQA FINDINGS This project was included in the Strategic Plan El that was certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Proposal Letter from Brown and Caldwell dated February 13, 2004 DF:lc:jo:lc:gc KWephaganda\Baartl Agenda Reporta\2004 Board Agenda Repoda\0404\Item 13(0.Bmmn and Celdwe0.dcc aaarur Page 4 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Primary Clarifiers No.1631 and Related Facilities Job No.P1-37 1. ansa I.Ecre-FE iff.indso an. EVOin xoPGnox YYYE BupoEi cina. T...E ar.n. ...fitat oRE e.ElEry to ® { Bart t ® t NisYeaN l! { Professional Services Agreement Status Report Primary Clarifiers No. 16-31 and Related Facilities Job No. P7-37 Total Project Budget: $88,561,000 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Start Date of Project September 1998 Date Amendment Description Cost Accumulated Costs Original PSA Provide engineering services for 96-MGD Primary 9/23/98 Clarifiers and Related Facilities $1 993 000 $1,993,000 Provide engineering services for: (1) rehabilitation of 4/28/99 1 existing primary clarifiers; (2)centralized sludge $863,185 $2,856,185 collection and transfer facilities (3) modification to influent distribution structure; and (4) installation of trickling filter feed line Provide engineering services needed to conduct an 11/15/99 2 evaluation of high rate clarifiers as recommended by the $21,557 $2,877,742 Value Engineer Provide engineering design services necessary to 12/15/99 3 Improve odor control and automate the P1-33 clarifiers. $189,537 $3,067,279 Provide construction support services involved with additional work added in Addenda Nos. 1-3 Provide engineering design services necessary to add 8/23/00 4 another control building, retrofit controls, and effluent $511,045 $3,578,324 monitoring, install a pilot coagulation plant, provide CMMS work, and miscellaneous re-work. Provide engineering design services necessary to bring 7/2/01 6 the final design submittal up to current standards and to $24,783 $3,603,107 provide design changes recommended by District staff. Provide construction support services to support the 2/27/02 6 construction phase of the contract. $1,602,797 $5,205,904 Increase construction support services to support the Pending 7 construction phase of the contract. $992,957 $6,198,861 EDMS`aO3764622 0421/04 Revised 0511498 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. P2-60, Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2 Total Project Budget: $14,950,000 Consultant: Carollo Engineers Start Date of Project: February 1998 Date Amendment Description Cost Accumulated Costs Professional engineering services for the design of 2/25/98 Original PSA the Solids Storage Facility at Plant $795,101 $795,101 No. 1, and Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2 Additional design work for the Cake Transfer 11/24/98 1' Pumps Layout Evaluation for P2-60 $18,461 $818,562 Additional design work for the Flat Bottom Storage 4/28/99 2 Bin Design and Electrical Improvements for P2.60, $101,964 $915,526 Discontinue Contract for P1-60 12/20/00 3 Construction Support Services for P2-60 $306,359 $1,221,885 Pending Additional Construction Support Services for P2-60 $171,786 $1,393,671 4 due to the extended construction time required to com late this ro'ect. • Approved by GM per delegated authority by board Resolution 99-23 EDMS:W37&1923 40D Edging suix 10 Irvim.CAfemia 926D2 Td: (714)73b7600 Fs(714)7344M www.bmwmndddwell.mm February 13,2004 r t Mr.Dean Fisher Project Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,Califomia 92708-7018 12/91017.003 Subject: Addendum No. 7 Construction Support Services Primary Clarifier 16-31 and Related Facilities Job Number Pt-37 Dear Mr. Fisher. As requested,we have been providing additional engineering services during the construction of Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities.We we requesting a revision to our contract to include services which are either additions to our scope and/or men than our original estimate. The following items describe additions to our scope items and additional engineering services during the construction of the subject project. 1. Provide On-Site Geotechnical Services (Subconsultant Cost).The District requested the services of Converse Consultant,geotechnical subconsultant to Brown and Caldwell for Project Pi-37,to provide geotechnical services during the mictopile installation.The subconsultant's fee and cost for this item will be$32,900. 2. Provide On-Site Engineering Services. Starting from April 1,2003,the District requested that Brown and Caldwell provide on-site engineering services for the construction of P1-37.Based on the effort required in the past nine months,it is estimated that Brown and Caldwell will provide 12 hours per week of on-site engineering services until the completion of the construction (April 2006). Labor Hours 1,872 Labor and Overhead $266,625 Direct Costs $5,000 profit $17,330 Total $288,995 i2Ua91017403u0141 nWJe &J E s , i e a n . e a r a l E a g i n e e e r d C Mr. Dean Fisher February 13,2004 Page 2 3. Preparation of Responses to RFIs and RFCs. Our original estimate for developing responses to RFIs/RFCs was based on spending 10 hours per week: eight hours of professional time and two hours of clerical time. Based on our actual hours spent until December 26,2003,our revised estimate is approximately 18 hours per week.The additional cost for engineering services for responding to RFIs/RFCs will be as follows: Labor Hours 1,922 Labor and Overhead 3228,000 Direct Costs $500 Profit $14,820 Total $243,320 4. Shop Drawing Submittal Review. Our original estimate for reviewing shop drawings for the subject project is 1410 hours.This translates into about 200 submittals based on the review time of seven hours per submittal.As of January 18,2004,we have already reviewed 430 submittals.We estimate a total of 592 submittals until the completion of this project.The cost for engineering services for reviewing additional submittals will be as follows: Labor Hours 2,734 Labor and Overhead $344,884 Direct Costs $500 Profit $22,416 Total $367,800 5. Deletion of Scrubber Work.The District requested preparation of a Request for Proposal(RFP) for the deletion of scrubber work from the Contractor's scope of work.The deletion work includes revising technical specifications, 14 electrical drawings,and 12 process and instrumentation drawings.The cost of preparing the RFP for the deletion of scrubber work will be as follows: Labor Hours 128 Labor and Overhead $13,118 Direct Costs $200 Profit $852 Total $14,170 6. Review of Contractor's Cost Proposals.At the District's request,Brown and Caldwell reviewed several cost proposals prepared by the Contractor.This was not included in our original scope of work.The additional cost for reviewing the Contractors cost proposal is: Labor Hours 100 Labor and Overhead $12,623 Direct Costs $ -- Profit $820 Total $13,443 124J191017 0A\103141 Addendum 8.dm Mr.Dean Fisher February 13,2004 Page 3 7. Provide Assistance in Startup,Initial Operation, and Shutdown of Facilities. Our original estimate for providing assistance during four phases (New clarifiers,Eastside existing clarifiers,Westside existing clarifiers,and clarifiers 1 through 5) of sump,initial operation and trouble shooting is 560 hours.This translates into 140 hours for each phase or 23 hours for each discipline(mechanical,process,HVAC,plumbing,electrical,and instrumentation).Based on our recent experience for projects of similar size and complexity,we estimate 32 hours for startup,initial operation and trouble shooting of each discipline.The cost for engineering services for providing additional services will be as follows: Labor Hours 208 Labor and Overhead $28,985 Direct Costs $1,500 Profit $1,884 Total $52,369 The summary of additional services is as follows: Hourly Labor& Direct Task t22,734 Rate Overhead Coats Profit Total No. Task Description $ hr $ $ 1 On-Sire Geotechnical Services -- - - $32,900 ubconsultant Cost 2 On-Sire eerie Services 142.43 266,625 5,000 17,330 288,955 3 Responses to RFIs/RFCs 119.25 228,000 500 14,820 243,320 4 ShopDrawingsReview 126.15 344,884 500 22,416 367,800 5 Deletion of Scmbber Wotk 102.50 13,118 200 852 14,170 6 Review of Contractor's RFN 100 126.23 12,623 820 13,443 7 IS"/Initial Operation 1 2081 139.351 28,985 1 1,5001 1,894 32,369 To 894W 1 7,7001 58,MA 992, 57 The total allowable compensation under this addendum will be: Existing Change per Agreement as Addendum Amended Item Amended No.7 Agreement Engineering Services (burdened labor plus overhead Q 1100/6), $4,476,751 $894,235 $5,370,986 Not to Exceed Subconsultant Fees and Costs, Not to Exceed $179,600 $32,900 $212,500 Profit 1 $299,231 151,122 1 $357,358 Direct Costs,Not to Exceed 1 $250,317 i7,72L_j $258,017 Toml,Not mFxcee $5,209,904 $992,997 1 4198,961 INI9.91n17.Mr\1031.1 AM Mum&M II Mc.Deso Fisher 4 February 13,2004 Page 4 Please note that our total engineering cost for predesign,final design and construction support services including this Addendum No. 7 will be$6,198,861 this is only 8.7 percent of the total construction cost of the project For the project of above-avenge complexity,this percentage is significantly lower than the recent District's projects of comparable size and complexity. We would be pleased to discuss this estin3ate with you at your convenience,Please call me if you have any questions. Very truly Yom, BROWN AND CAI-DVI= Robert M.Finn,P.E. Vice President AM:RF:ksy 1Y 91017M3\10310 AJdeMun&doe, PDC COMMITTEE Meedng Date Tgatl.gf Dir. 04/08/04 04/381 4 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Item Number PD004-34 ON) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Kathy Millea, Engineer SUBJECT: SOLIDS STORAGE AND TRUCK LOADING FACILITY AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-60 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers, providing for additional engineering services for Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-60, for an additional amount of $171,786, increasing the total amount not to exceed $1,393,671. SUMMARY • This project constructs a new solids storage and truck loading facility at Plant No. 2. The contractor, JW Construction, has filed for bankruptcy. The bonding company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, has been required by the courts to complete the project. The completion of construction was originally scheduled to be July 2002. Construction completion is anticipated to be August 2004, but the schedule is still being finalized by the Surety Company. • The original construction was scheduled to be completed within a 26-month contract. The project is currently in its 46" month, and is anticipated to take at least 50 months. Carollo Engineers has been providing construction support services for the project. Their budget was based on an anticipated 26-month construction period. Their construction services budget has been expended on additional services provided to assist the District during the extended construction period. The estimated amount of $171,786 is needed for continued construction support services through the close-out of construction. These services will include: o Providing a part-time resident engineer o Preparation of record drawings o Preparation of operations and maintenance manuals o Operator training including O&M manuals o Project Quality Control to ensure the project is being constructed per the plans & specifications • This amendment includes 20 hours per week (480 hours total) for a Resident Engineer and additional construction management support services (750 hours total) required to complete the project as listed above. H:,4ep,W genEalOoartl ABentln A..OJ4=,8—d AgenOn%W'W'114.n 13111,C.Mro En,d- Ae..a: Page 1 • Presently, the District is withholding anticipated damages in the amount of$558,000 on this contract. The liquidated damages specified at $1,000 per day will continue to accrue through the completion of the project. A portion of these funds will offset the requested cost of additional engineering services included in this agenda item. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS Please see the attached Professional Services Agreement (PSA) Status Report. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Authorization of a budget reallocation of $171,786 from Contingency is being requested, which includes$127,198 to Phase 4 Construction, $13,558 to Phase 5 Commissioning, and $31,030 to Phase 6 Close-out. The total budget remains $14,950,000. Please see attached Budget Information Table. BUDGETIMPACT ® This Item has been budgeted. (Line Item: 2003/2004 Budget Section 8 page 66) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This is the first contract that the District has awarded to JW Contracting. Progress on the project was consistently slow, and the Contractor suffered the loss of many key staff members involved on the project. It became apparent during the course of construction that JW Contracting would not complete the project on or near the scheduled completion. The District has withheld anticipated Liquidated Damages since the contract completion date of July 2002 ($558,000 to date). Knowing that the schedule and its associated delays had the potential to become a major claim, the District retained the services of a scheduling consultant in August 2002. General Counsel was brought in to the project in April 2003. In May 2003, the District notified the Bonding Company, Travelers Insurance, of the District's concern with the Contractor's ability and willingness to complete the project. A few weeks later, JW Contracting filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy. In June 2003, the District held a compliance meeting with JW Contacting and Travelers Insurance. Not seeing progress, the District issued a Notice of Default in October 2003. A Court Order in November 2003 assigned Travelers Insurance to complete the project. The District's Takeover Agreement with Travelers Insurance is being finalized. Construction is scheduled to be completed in August 2004. ALTERNATIVES No alternatives are proposed. X WepM9pn4nrBoarE Fpend.R.p..@O 80014A,W. Enp.dx RsviW o 103 Page 2 CEGA FINDINGS Final 1989 Master Plan EIR approved on July 19, 1989, and Notice of Determination filed on July 20, 1989. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Fee Proposal for Amendment No. 4 KTM:eh:ba:jo:lc H.WglobaMge Draft Repods\PDOPMO AR 040804 PSA Addendum No 4.doc "MOPN9eMN AWM Aepai9#ex eoar4 AWm atD9MYi9f9bm t9191twe694� A°"'°4 oweo9 Page 3 I BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Solids Slom"and Truck Loading FaCilltyat Plan NO,2 JOB NO.P240 FROJECTour.. un�on�g rw vruv we assai • awae. ww lure rcolan on wruv 0 sidarsad so . s u•. a e so s ock 1 111. s s s s df4 I i .—I, bn r i cal ",.I. i t { Cd s ml kr s I.M.I. mM s ussurack omc..r 4 s s Professional Services Agreement Status Report Job No. 132-60, Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2 Total Project Budget: $14,950,000 Consultant: Carollo Engineers Start Date of Project: February 1998 [21251�98 a Amendment Description Cost Accumulated Costs Professional engineering services for the design of Original PSA the Solids Storage Facility at Plant $795,101 $795,101 No. 1, and Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facili at Plant No. 2 Additional design work for the Cake Transfer 11/24/98 1' Pumps Layout Evaluation for P2-60 $18,461 $818,562 Additional design work for the Flat Bottom Storage 4/28/99 2 Bin Design and Electrical Improvements for P2-60, $101,964 $915,526 Discontinue Contract for P1-60 12/20/00 3 Construction Support Services for P2-60 $306,359 $1,221,885 Pending Additional Construction Support Services for P2-60 $171,786 $1,393,671 4 due to the extended construction time required to complete this project. • A pp wad by OM per delegated aut "try board Resolution 99-23 EDMS:W3764923 rOLLO e n G i Ine e r 5 ca •.:y,:w:::I::�H{,.utiuu-y March 3, 2004 4584A.20 Orange County Sanitation District P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Attention: Ms. Kathy Millea Subject: Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-60 Professional Services Agreement Addendum No. 4 Dear Ms. Millea: As we have discussed, Carollo's construction services budget for the P2-60 project is nearly depleted. This is due, in large part, to the Contractor not completing the project within the specified 26-month contract time. The project is currently in its 45th month and has been taken over by the Surety. During the construction period, Carollo also completed, at District request, a number of additional tasks.We have also recently been asked by the District to prepare an estimate to assist with the management and closeout of the project.To address all of these issues, we have prepared this proposed Addendum No. 4 to our original contract dated February 25, 1998. Contract Work Four remaining tasks remain to be completed in accordance with the contract through Addendum No. 3. The budgeted effort to complete these tasks was expended on additional services provided to assist the District during the 19-month extension (to date) of the construction period. The remaining tasks include: Task Description 5b Prepare Contract Record Drawings 6 Prepare O&M Manuals 7 Project Management 8 Operator Training Column No.4 in Exhibit 1 (attached) shows the labor hours that Carollo has expended on Contract tasks through January 1, 2004. Column No. 5 shows the estimated additional labor hours we expect will be required to complete the Record Drawings, O&M Manuals, Operator Training, and Project Management tasks. The total effort anticipated for these four tasks is 3100 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD, SUITE 200 9pNTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92704 (71/) 5/0-/300 FAX (]t/) 5/0-/019 Ms. Kathy Millea , Orange County Sanitation District March 3, 2004 Page 2 actually slightly less than our previous budget because we expect fewer hours than originally estimated to complete the Record Drawings. Additional Work During the course of the project, Carollo performed additional work at the District's request. This includes witnessing of factory testing of Putzmeister's equipment, inspection of rebar at critical areas of the solids storage bins, drawing and specification changes to accommodate changes in the District's electrical standards, and third submittal reviews. The labor hours expended on this additional work are shown in Column 4 of Exhibit 1. Project Closeout Services Based on the requested level of services discussed in our recent telephone conversations, we have broken the closeout services into two tasks: Task Description 13 Construction Coordinator 14 Project Overview/CA/QC • Construction Coordinator.We will set aside approximately half of Mark Ludlow's time to provide this critical role in the closeout effort. Mark has been Carollo's construction services manager for P2-60, and he is most familiar with the current status of the project. Mark will serve as the interface between the Surety,the Surety's contractor, and the District. He will run the construction meetings and provide inspection, startup services, and administrative services as required. • Project Overview/QA/OC: Carollo will provide project overview and QA/QC on a limited basis during the closeout period. These hours have been set-aside for I&C assistance, as well as design team and partner level overview. The projected work effort for completing the original contract work, the additional work, and the project closeout services total 1,229 labor hours, at a cost (including profit)of$171,786. Exhibit B shows the monthly distribution we expect for the work.We have$5,541 remaining from our contract through Amendment No. 3.This is all expense money, which we expect will be needed to complete the record drawings reproduction, and for incidental expenses such as mileage to and from the job site.We believe the current$10,554 expense budget will be adequate through Addendum No. 4. Carollo appreciates OCSD's consideration of our proposal. We feel that OCSD's staff and Carollo have worked well as a team in keeping this complex construction project moving ahead as efficiently as can be expected within the constraints caused by the Contractor's bankruptcy. This joint effort has been valuable for this project.We look forward to continuing our construction support through completion of the project. HydWV.d SA0W05UA20ILbW--005.d- Ms. Kathy Millea Orange County Sanitation District March 3, 2004 Page 3 Please call us if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, CAROLLO ENGINEERS, P.C. Mark S. Ludlow, P.E. Allen C. Todd, P.E. Project Manager Partner MSUACT:pmb Enclosure N:1CMmIWcsV SRPNp581APOLL1M11Aea005.doc Exhibit 1 I r Orange County Sanitation Distrct Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facilities at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-60 CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES ONLY Estimated Construction Actual Addendum No. Estimated Services Construction 4: Hours Construction Labor Hours Services Labor Required to Services Total Through Hours Through Complete Hours Including Addendum 111/04 Tasks Addendum No.4 Task No.Description No. 3 Original Contract Work 1 Progress Meetings 573 263 0 263 2 Review Submittals 1230 1882 0 1882 3 jReview and Respond to RFIs 526 744 0 744 4 Review C.O.s, Plan Changes 490 681 0 681 5a Prepare Conformed Drawings 110 110 0 110 5b Prepare Contract Record Dwgs. 613 178 222 400 6 Prepare O&M Manuals 676 317 359 676 7 Project Management 68 96 23 120 8 Operator Training 100 3 97 100 Subtotal 4386 4274 701 4976 Additional Work Owner Requested Factory 9 lWitness Testing 0 47 47 Owner Requested Electrical 10 Chances 0 6 6 Owner Requested Structural 11 Ins ection 0 36 36 12 Third Submittal Reviews 0 65 65 Additional Work Subtotal 0 154 0 164 Project Closeout Services 0 0 13 Construction Coordinator 0 0 480 480 14 Project Overview/QA/QC 0 0 48 48 Project Closeout Subtotal 0 0 528M$667,079 Labor Hours 4386 4428 1229 Labor Rate $100.80 $100.57 $127.70 Labor Cost $442,163 $445,329 $156,939 Profit $42.576 $42,150 $14,947 Labor lus Profit $484,739 $487,479 $171,755 Expenses $10.554 $2,273 Construction Services Total $495,293 $489,752 Add.No. 3 Funds memaining I $5,541 TOTAL WORK DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES Costs Costs for Through Amendment Amended Total Amendment No.4 No. 3 Total En . Services $1,107,583 $156.939 $1,264,522 Total Subs Fees $12,373 $0 $12,373 Total Profit $101,929 $14,847 $116,776 Total Not to Excead Cost $1,221,885 $771,786 $1,393,671 Exhibit B Estimated Work Effort Construction Support Services Solids Storage and Truck Loading Facility P2-60 Orange County Sanitation Districts Item No. Item Description Total Hours Prior 10 F-04 F_04 M=04 A_04 M_04 J-04 J-04 A=04 5=04 0_04 N=04 D=04 ADD 4Total Original Contract Work 1.0 Progress Meetings 0 283 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 Review Submittals _ 0 1.882 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 &0 Review and Respond to RFI's 0 744 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 4.0 Review C.O.S, Plan Changes 0 681 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5111 Prepare Conformed Drawings 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5b Prepare Record Drawings 222 _ 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 111 222 8.0 Prepare O&M Manuals 359 - 317 0 0 45 45 45 45 45 45 89 0 0 359 7.0 Prated Management 23 97 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 23 8.0 Operator Training 97 3 0 0 0 0 50 0 47 0 0 0 0 97 Original Contract Work Subtotal 701 4,275 2 2 47 47 97 47 94 47 91 113 114 701 Additional Work 9.0 Factory Witness Testing 0 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.0 Electrical Changes 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.0 Structural Inspection 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.0 Third Submittal Review 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AddHonal Work Subtotal 0 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prolect Closeout Services 13.0 Construction Coordinator 460 0 0 0 0 80 80 80 80 80 80 0 0 480 14.0 Project Overview/OAOC 48 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 0 48 Project Closeout Services Subtotal 528 0 0 0 0 88 88 88 88 88 88 0 0 528 Total 1,229 4,429 2 2 47 135 185 135 182 135 179 113 114 1,229 2004 AmendmenlRevlslon 2.MIS I 3/3/2004 'a BOARD OF DIRECTORS MeebngDate TOBd.ordr. 4/08/09 4128ID AGENDA REPORT Item Number HWn Number PDC04-35 13(h) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Angie Anderson, Senior Engineering Associate SUBJECT: AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO THE 1999 STRATEGIC PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, JOB NO. J-40-5 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates, providing for additional environmental services for Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report, Job No. J-40-5, for an additional amount of$141,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $513,500. SUMMARY • The Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Environmental Science Associates (ESA) provides for Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Nos. 2, 3, 4, and 5 to update the 1999 Strategic Plan Program EIR (PEIR) for the following four projects: (1) Treatment Plant No. 2 Headworks Project, Job No. P2-66; (2) Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Main Project, Contract No. 5-58; (3) Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Contract No. 1-10; and (4) Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50. • Under proposed Amendment No. 3 ESA will prepare a Subsequent or Tiered EIR for each of the four projects in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). • General Counsel recommends that the level of CEQA analysis be increased from a Supplemental EIR to a Tiered EIR, requiring ESA to perform additional detailed analysis and documentation, instead of the previously minor modifications to the PEIR in the original scope of work. • No change to the existing project budget is required for this amendment. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS See attached PSA Status Report NAtle0N.+0entlnlBmrtl ApenGa ReOetlelYWO BoorE AOentlo Repons➢401Wem 13111 EIA1tt RenxP. OfirOfl03 Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY u As indicated in the attached Budget Information Table, authorization of $251,000 is being requested; $141,000 is requested for the proposed PSA, and additional $110,000 for Staff and material costs. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. Line item: (Miscellaneous a Support proiects,supplementai No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan, Section 8,page 11) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) There is no change to the overall project budget as shown in the attached Budget Information Table. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The total contract budget reflected in the contract summary above covers more than just the four EIRs addressed in this proposed PSA modification. Several other environmental documents have been completed within the overall Consultant's contract including five addenda, four negative declarations, and one supplemental EIR. The Consultant's original scope of work for the four EIRs assumed that each project would require minor modifications to the 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) and that Supplemental EIRs would be sufficient to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The analysis contained in the 1999 PEIR consisted of rehabilitation of some structures, replacement of equipment, and upgrades to meet electrical or seismic codes for the treatment and collection systems. However, as the result of subsequent engineering assessment conducted for each of these projects, the project scopes were either expanded or modified. The task associated with preparation of Subsequent or Tiered EIRs for the four projects are described below: Treatment Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement Project ($15,000) 1) Revise Draft Screen-check Supplemental EIR for publication as a Subsequent EIR. 2) Prepare an Initial Study to focus on the scope of the Subsequent EIR and provide substantiation for impact assessment. 3) Incorporate District staff and general counsel comments on the EIR. Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Mains Replacement Project ($55,000) 1) Provide analysis of traffic impacts for Alternative 1, Pacific Coast Highway alignments. 2) Revise Draft Supplement EIR for publication as a Tiered EIR. This requires including analysis not included in the original scope of work. H:W,.a,WMBoa,d Ap Wn F.,,d OW Bmrd F,. da Pe..M1VWOiWem 1]InLESAdx Aew..d. MM3 Page 2 3) Prepare alternatives assessment of six alignment options. The original scope assumed analysis of one alignment alternative. As the project has evolved, two alternatives with six alignments, three alignments for each alternative, are proposed for project level of detail in the Tiered EIR. 4) Prepare a cumulative projects impact assessment. The original scope assumed that the Supplement EIR would rely on the cumulative impact assessment included in the PEIR. 5) Coordination with U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (ACOE). As details of the project were developed, it has become clear that the ACOE will be instrumental in providing the necessary clearances for Aftemative 2 alignments in the marsh. 6) Conduct reconnaissance biological survey. A survey is to be performed to identify potential impacts to the marsh, due to the sensitive habitats along the Alternative 2 route. Replacement of Ellis Avenue Pump Station Project ($35.000) 1) Prepare and re-circulate a Revised Notice of Preparation (NOP). As the result of the public comments received at the scoping, the document will be revised to include additional alternative locations. Seven alternatives will be considered at project-level detail in the EIR. The Draft EIR will provide a summary of the four remaining alternatives that were considered but rejected for project level analysis. 2) Conduct an additional Scoping Meeting for the Revised NOP, which reflects additional aftemative locations and project modifications. 3) Prepare an Initial Study to focus on the expanded scope required for a Tiered EIR and provide substantiation for impact assessment. 4) Prepare alternatives assessment of pump station locations. The original scope did not anticipate the level of effort required to prepare an Alternatives Section of the EIR. 5) Prepare a cumulative projects impact assessment. The original scope assumed that the Supplement EIR would rely on the cumulative impacts assessment included in the PEIR. 6) Provide a Historic Building Survey, if required. Depending on the alternative locations selected, a Historic Building Survey may be needed to determine the potential historical significance of structures that could be demolished. 7) Provide Traffic Engineering Report. The project would likely result in lane closures and temporary detours. Depending on the location of the proposed project, a traffic engineering report may be required to assess impacts of construction and long-tens operations of the pump station. Rocky Point Pump Station Replacement Project ($30.000) 1) Prepare an Initial Study to focus on the scope of the Tiered EIR and provide substantiation for impact assessment. 2) Prepare alternatives assessment of pump station locations. The original scope did not include an assessment of the additional alternatives. 3) Prepare alternatives assessment of pump station locations. The original scope did not include an assessment of alternative locations. Based on comments received on the Notice of Preparation (NOP), it was determined that the EIR would need to include a substantial aftematives analysis and a Tiered EIR was required. N begNpm°aArerE paeipe MpanS2a0a E°a°Pgm°a Fo�n'OfpNem IJIM.ESA°z a.,,aa°. oEmaro� Page 3 4) Prepare cumulative project impacts assessment. 5) Provide a Historic Building Survey. As the environmental work has progressed, the results of the cultural resources analysis indicate that a Historic Building Survey is required for the structures to be demolished for the proposed (preferred) project site. ALTERNATIVES Staff cannot proceed with project bidding or construction of Treatment Plant No. 2 Headworks Project, Job No. P2-66, Newport Trunk Sewer and Force Main Project, Contract No. 5-58, Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station, Contract No. 1-10, or Rocky Point Pump Station, Contract No. 5-50. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the environmental documentation (Subsequent or Tiered EIRs)for these projects. CEQA FINDINGS The Strategic Plan PEIR was certified in October 1999. However, these projects will require preparation of either a Subsequent or Tiered EIR to cover the complete replacement projects. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report AA:sa:gc H:WglobakAgeWa Draft Repaln�PDCUd0.5 Amandmem 3 AR 030304.eoc N:Wo.,nd.lB ApBntla RepMP3aM 8e PpenOS RaNNWONbm 131AI£SAJ R '.d: oamAm3 Page 4 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Tmatment Plant No.2 HeadworNs Roplocoment Prolett JOB NO. 140.5 PP A S PnWrWN I.ta NN lxn t, O ana➢ � 41N Md[LTNXaY pVMep[mD Nd ^LNpeD Dmaaaa a NfMO+RAM IOTPL - .a. ton Dvoon. �" a Dn . nmutnT . aurxonaaTrox to Dare rw.a. a 140= 1 s axiom rw...ca.oe radeprTmaL 1. 14.0001. msam onmo s waso s m+.mo a num s eHam ax�a.ww.a o...... 1. .1. na.. $ annatil. ..I. m+mo s e+um a es.am Poucom.n an ammo cwiNwra.,.+ Professional Services Agreement Status Report Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Job No. J-40-5 Total Project Budget: $806,250 Consultant: Environmental Science Associates (ESA) Start Date of Project: March 28, 2001 Date FJUmndment Description Cost Accumulated Costs Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR). 3/28/01 Original PSA The work is to support additional environmental $77,830 $77,830 documentation projects under design or were not included in the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR analysis. To address upcoming collection system and treatment plant projects that require additional 3/27/02 1 environmental analysis and documentation to $116,170 $194,000 supplement the Strategic Plan EIR. A budget increase is also required for FY 2001-02 through FY 2002-03. To address four projects that will require additional environmental analysis and documentation, 6/25/03 2 Supplemental Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5, to the 1999 $178,500 $372,500 Strategic Plan EIR. A budget increase is also re wired for FY 2002-03 through FY 2003-04. To address the four projects identified in Amendment No. 2 that will require revisions to the Proposed 3 environmental analysis and documentation $141,000 $513,500 necessary for preparation of Subsequent or Tiered EIRs. A budget increase is also required for FY 2004-05. AA:sa EDM5003755355 04)21/04 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report Job No. J-40-5 Total Project Budget: $806,250 Consultant: Environmental Science Associates (ESA) Start Date of Project: March 28, 2001 Date Amendment Description Cost Accumulated Costs Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR). 3/28/01 Original PSA The work is to support additional environmental $77,830 $77,830 documentation projects under design or were not included in the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR analysis. To address upcoming collection system and treatment plant projects that require additional 3/27/02 1 environmental analysis and documentation to $116,170 $194,000 supplement the Strategic Plan EIR. A budget increase is also required for FY 2001-02 through FY 2002-03. To address four projects that will require additional environmental analysis and documentation, 6/25/03 2 Supplemental Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5, to the 1999 $178,500 $372,500 Strategic Plan EIR. A budget increase is also required for FY 2002-03 through FY 2003-04. To address the four projects identified in Amendment No. 2 that will require revisions to the Proposed 3 environmental analysis and documentation $141,000 $513,500 necessary for preparation of Subsequent or Tiered EIRs. A budget increase is also required for FY 2004-05. AA:sa EDMS 003765355 09/21Po MINUTES OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING Orange County Sanitation District Wednesday, April 14, 2004, 5:00 p.m. A meeting of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee of the Orange County Sanitation District was held on April 14,2004, at 5:00 p.m., in the District's Administrative Office. (1) The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: FAHR COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Directors Present: Blake Anderson, General Manager Brian Brady, Chair Gary Streed, Director of Finance/Treasurer Roy Moore, Vice Chair Mike White, Controller Patricia Bortle Jeff Reed, Human Resources Manager Bruce Broadwater, Alternate Dir. Carol Beekman, Communications Services Joy Neugebauer Manager Shirley McCracken, Board Chair Jan Collins, Principal Human Resources Analyst Steve Anderson, Vice Board Chair Jean Tappan, Acting Committee Secretary Directors Absent: OTHERS PRESENT: James W. Silva Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Bob Lockhart Bob Gaggle Don Hughes (2) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR PRO TEM Director Moore chaired the meeting at Director Brady's request, who arrived late. (3) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. (4) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE CHAIR Vice Chair Moore announced that alternate Director Bruce Broadwater was filling in for Director Bill Dalton tonight. He also announced that the next meeting date is May 12. The contract internal auditors, Moss, Levy& Hartzheim, were scheduled to make a report but it has been deferred to May. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 2 April 14, 2004 (5) REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER General Manager Blake Anderson reported on the discussions at the GW RS Steering Committee on the very high bid received on the Advanced Treatment Facilities project. A third- party review of the bid will be undertaken to ensure everything is addressed. The GWRS Steering Committee unanimously decided to recommend award of the contract to J. F. Shea Inc. to both OCWD and OCSD Boards at their next meetings (April 21 and 28, 2004, respectively). There is an all-day session on developing partnerships between OC agencies on April 30 sponsored by the Orange County Leadership Symposium. The session begins at 8:30 a.m. and will be held at the OC Fire Authority's new headquarters building. There is no cost associated with this event. Mr. Anderson urged all Directors to attend. He also announced that the Fourth Annual Orange County Leadership Symposium will again be held in January 2005. (6) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF FINANCETTREASURER Gary Streed, Director of Finance, reported that personnel from the auditing firm of Moss, Levy& Hartzhelm were on site last week doing follow up work and new field work, but he has received no feedback from their visit. He also reported that one of the two corporate notes that are shown as being in non-compliance in the Investment Report reached maturity last week. We received all of our Investment plus interest. Mr. Streed also reported on a meeting held with PIMCO to discuss its Investigation by the SEC and any potential impacts to the District. PIMCO has not been notified of any SEC violations despite considerable review at its offices. The District does not have investments in any of the PIMCO mutual funds that are being investigated by the SEC. The lawsuit by the State of New Jersey, the CaIPERS review and procedural changes instituted by PIMCO were also discussed. The PIMCO response to the New Jersey suit is due between now and the Board meeting. (7) REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES Human Resources Manager Jeff Reed did not make a report. (8) REPORT OF COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES MANAGER Communications Services Manager Carol Beekman deferred her report to later in the agenda. (9) REPORT OF GENERAL COUNSEL General Counsel Tom Woodruff updated the members on SIB 1272, the Ortiz bill that addresses special districts' govemance issues. The bill was amended again this week after meetings with the affected agencies' representatives. Mr.Woodruff reported on a meeting held last week with the Board's Chair and Vice Chair to discuss the proposed changes to the OCSD Resolution that details Directors compensation. Some of the changes are addressed In the Ortiz bill, but others are Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting _ Page 3 April 14, 2004 clarifications and definitions. The Resolution will be presented to the Steering Committee at its next meeting. Mr.Woodruff is following this bill and will make an analysis that will be included in the agenda packages next week. (10) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS Director Joy Neugebauer asked that Item I. be pulled from the Consent Calendar for consideration separately. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: a. Approve minutes of the March 10,2004, Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee meeting. Alternate Director Broadwater abstained. b. FAHR04-23 Recommend to the Board of Directors to receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 2004. The Treasurer's Report will be distributed at the FAHR Committee meeting in accordance with the Board-approved Investment Policy, and in conformance to the Government Code requirement to have monthly reports reviewed within 30 days of month end. C. FAHR04-24 Receive and file Certificates of Participation (COP) Monthly Report. d. FAHR04-25 Receive and file Employment Status Report as of March 30, 2004. e. FAHR04-26 Receive and file OSHA Incidence Rates and Workers' Compensation Claims and Costs Report. I. FAHR04-27 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve Revision 2 of SAFETY-POL-101, Injury and Illness Prevention Program, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy. g. FAHR04-28 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve SAFETY- POL-107, Hazard Communication Policy, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Hazard Communication Program. h. FAHR04-29 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve SAFETY- POL-108, Contractor Safety Policy, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Contractor Safety Program. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 4 April 14, 2004 I. FAHR0430 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve SAFETY- POL-115, Backflow Prevention Policy, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District's Backflow Prevention Program. j. FAHR04-31 Recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt Resolution No. OCSD 04-09,A Resolution of the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, Dedicating its Revenues for Payment of Debt Obligations. k. FAHR04-32 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve three Deferred Payment Agreements negotiated by the General Manager for the collection of all charges and fees owed, plus interest of 7% per annum, with Dee Shin USA, Inc., Expo Dyeing & Finishing, Inc., and Y2K Textile, Inc. m. FAHR04-34 Recommend to the Board of Directors to approve a one time only non-base building payment for the Secretary to the General Manager in an amount not to exceed $1,200. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any. I. FAHR04-33 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Receive and file staff's responses to the Internal Audit Report issued on March 3, 2004, by the District's contracted internal auditors Moss, Levy& Hartzheim. Director Neugebauer asked about the procedures that are in place or would be in place to avoid the same kind of concerns in the future. Mr. Streed reported that in most instances there are policies covering the issues of concern. He stated that staff training will correct most of the auditors concerns. Where there were problems changes have already been made to correct them. General Manager Anderson commented that the report findings were very preliminary and in some instances the auditors may not have had all the information they needed. Director Neugebauer commended staff for implementing the changes identified in the report. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 5 April 14, 2004 (11) ACTION ITEMS a. FAHR04-35 MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Direct staff to present the preliminary budgets for FY 04-05 to the Standing Committees in May for their review, prior to consideration by the FAHR Committee,for recommendation to the Board of Directors for adoption in June. Gary Streed provided new information on the five budgets, which include Implementing the scheduled$11 Styear Sanitary Sewer Service Charge. Director Moore complimented staff on the way the information is formatted. b. FAHR04-36 Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize and implement the Sanitary Sewer Service Charge Schedule for the Fiscal Years of 2004.05, 2005-06,2006-07 and 2007-08, that was adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD-20 last year, subject to reaffirmation by a 2/3 vote of the Directors. Mr.Streed explained why there continues to be a need for the$15 increase this year, namely, because of the CIP. A review of the cash flow chart outlines the need. Staff recommends that, based on the chart, the Board approve the rate increase for all of the next four years as established by the Ordinance No. OCSD-20. Mr. Woodruff discussed the ability of the Board to change the rate in the future as well as reconsidering the 213 vote requirement The rates in the Ordinance passed last year are already adopted but staff cannot implement them until the Board reaffirms the decision. Mr. Anderson reported that with the increase in scheduled borrowing, the debt service will soon be higher than the current operating costs. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Recommend that the Board of Directors consider both of the following and authorize either: 1) That the Board of Directors reaffirm, authorize and implement the Sanitary Sewer Service Charge Schedule for the Fiscal Year 2004-05,that was adopted last year; Or 2) That the Board of Directors reaffirm, authorize and implement the Sanitary Sewer Service Charge Schedule for the Fiscal Years 2004-05, 2005-06,2006-07 and 2007-08, that was adopted last year without future further reaffirmation. Director McCracken opposed. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting Page 6 April 14, 2004 C. FAHR04-37 Receive and file staff's proposal to review commercial parcels. Bob Lockhart, of the Revenue Enhancement Group ("REG"), addressed the committee. He said that Director Duvall is scheduled to meet with his firm next month as authorized by the Committee in March. An alternate proposal is being prepared by REG for consideration by the Directors. . Mike White, Controller, reviewed the revised staff-implemented proposal. Staff has determined the need to review all commercial properties, estimated to be 46,500 parcels. The time required to review the properties is now estimated to be no fewer than two parcels per hour, and temporary services is estimated at$30 per hour. The proposal includes more parcels, more time to review each parcel and increased hourly rates from previous staff estimates. The new cost estimate Is $15 per parcel for a total not to exceed $696,600. The objectives were outlined and the review is scheduled to be completed in early 2005. A senior staff analyst would be assigned to this project to review the information and insure the accuracy of the data base. The position is already included in this year's budget request. After the initial year it is anticipated that 20 percent of the parcels will be reviewed annually so that every parcel is reviewed in a 5-year cycle. Mr. White then described that work would begin by reviewing vacant parcels followed by government owned parcels as the database is most likely to be Incorrect in these areas. Staff will include an estimate of the mileage that will be involved. MOVED, SECONDED AND DULY CARRIED: Continue the discussion until Director Duvall can report back on his findings. Director McCracken opposed. (12) INFORMATION PRESENTATIONS a. FAHR04-38 Communications Services Strategic Plan FY 2003-04 Update. Carol Beekman, Communications Services Manager, updated the committee on the activities of the division in the past quarter, Including the soliciting of members for the Biosolids Advisory Committee; plans for the 50"Anniversary celebration; Earth Day events; construction outreach activities; information on the Internet and intranet, and status of the corporate identity program. She also reminded the Directors that there is a joint OCWD/OCSD Board workshop on the GWRS next Wednesday, April21 at 5 p.m., and announced that Huell Howser Is helping with a video on the GW RS. Minutes of the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Meeting _ Page 7 April 14, 2004 Ms. Beekman will be making her next report in July and will be bringing an update on the plan to the committee for consideration. (13) CLOSED SESSION The Committee convened in Closed Session at 6:54 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to confer with Jan Collins, Human Resources Analyst, re recommended pay grade adjustments for the Executive Management. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2, and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. RECONVENE IN REGULAR SESSION:At 7:15 p.m.,the Committee reconvened in regular session. (14) OTHER BUSINESS, COMMUNICATIONS OR SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS. IF ANY There were none. (15) MATTERS WHICH A DIRECTOR MAY WISH TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR ACTION AND STAFF REPORT There were none. (16) CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETINGS The next FAHR Committee meeting is scheduled for May 12, 2004 at 5 p.m. (17) ADJOURNMENT The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m. Submitted by: y/ {^l L L AJ / J Tappan A ng FAHR Committee Secretary H:WepitegendatFAHRtFAHR2004\0404W41404 draft FAHR Minutes.dw FAHR COMMITTEE MeeOngoate Toad.or Dtr. 09/19/09 09/2a/09' AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FMIR04-23 14(b) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller SUBJECT: TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2O04 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Receive and file Treasurer's Report for the month of March 2004. SUMMARY Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District's professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District's third-party custodian bank for the investment program. Some funds are also deposited in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund for liquidity. The District's Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the "Liquid Operating Monies" and for the "Long-Term Operating Monies" portfolios. The District's external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the Investment Policy. The portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements. As shown on page 2 of the attached PIMCO's Performance Monitoring and Reporting Report for the Long-Term Operating Monies, there is a investment policy compliance exception pertaining to the holding of two securities within PIMCO's Long-Term Operating Monies Portfolio that had an acceptable rating at the time of purchase but has since fallen below the minimum rating allowed by the investment policy. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A- by S&P, with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating, at the time of purchase. The first of these rating exceptions pertains to the holding of a United Airlines (UAL)Asset Backed Security with a par value of$1.6 million, representing 0.41 percent of the portfolio holdings, whose rating from Moody's has fallen several times, from A3 to BA1, then to BA3, B3, B, and finally to CA. Likewise, the rating from Standard & Poor's has also fallen several times, first from A-to BBB, then to BB, then to B+, B-, and finally to CCC+. Although these ratings are less than what is required at the time of purchase. PIMCO believes, based on the financial strength of UAL and the underlying collateral of the security, that the District would suffer an unwarranted loss if the security was sold at this time. The second ratings exception pertains to the holding of a $1 million par of the Philip Morris-Altria corporate bond with an April 2004 maturity, representing 0.26 percent of the portfolio holdings, whose rating with Moody's has fallen from A2 to Baal and then to H:W. WnumawueTMMTRensRm 1 .dm Page 1 Baa2, and with S&P from A-to BBB. During the month of November, PIMCO sold $4 million par of this original $5 million holding at a price of$101.9 for a realized loss of $134,400. PIMCO believes based on the underlying assets of the parent company, that the District would suffer a severe unwarranted loss if the remaining $1 million holdings were sold at this time. The District's investment policy does not require any action because of"credit watch" notices or the decline in credit standing. However, PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit for these two securities very closely. Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District's portfolios are priced to market ("mark-to-market") as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: I ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District's custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. Also provided is a summary of monthly investment balances and transactions within the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). The remaining $65.9 million proceeds from the 2003 COP debt issuance available for future capital improvements is being managed and invested by PIMCO with Union Bank of California serving as the Trustee. When combined with the reserves of the existing outstanding debt issues, total debt service reserves with trustees totals $127,877,000. These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District's Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The table on the following page details the book balances of the District's investment accounts at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown on the attached bar chart. H:bepMnV2111 eWeTAHMTRF SRKNI304Im Page 2 ` Book Balances Estimated Invesmrent Accounts March 31.2004 Yield(%) State of Call.LAW $ 18.628,614 1.47 Union Bank Checking Account 2,230,695 0.88(1) PIMCO—Short-tens Portfolio 91.365.418 1.22 PIMCO-Long-term Portfolio 389,615.511 2.13 Petty Cash 5,000 WA TOTAL $501 B45 236 1.92 S12]a76 fl23 Debt Service Reserves w/Tmstees 2.11 (1) This is the annualized yield for the month of February. The March annualized rate was not available as of the date of this report. ATTACHMENTS 1. Graph of Monthly Investment Balances by Type— Last Six Months 2. Investment Transactions and Balances in the State Local Agency Investment Fund 3. PIMCO Monthly Investment Recap & Yield Analysis Report 4. PIMCO Performance Monitoring Report—Liquid Operating Monies 5. PIMCO Performance Monitoring Report—Long-Tern Operating Monies 6. Mellon Trust Asset Summary by Asset Type with Sectors—Liquid Operating Monies 7. Mellon Trust Asset Summary by Asset Type with Sectors— L-T Operating Monies 8. Mellon Trust Yield Analysis Report 9. Mellon Trust Asset Detail— Consolidated 10.Mellon Trust Transaction Detail - Consolidated MW:IC H'.tltlMnVPp�FAHa,IeEPSRFf W tYN.Ox Page 3 11 • IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, II�•1���111•iii \ \ 1 , • , , , , , , �, % % % :•:. .l.: go I 1 . Orange County Sanitation District Investment Transactions and Balances in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund March 31, 2004 Par Value Book Value Market Value Rate Yield Balance March 1, 2004 $16,928,614 $16,928,614 $16,928,614 1.474 1.474 Deposits. 3/17/2004 10,300.000 10.300,000 10,300,000 1.474 1.474 3/19/2004 7,500,000 7.500,000 7,600,000 1.474 1.474 Total Deposits 17.800.000 17.800,000 17,800,000 1A74 1.474 Withdrawals: 31=004 (700,000) (700,000) (700,000) 1.474 1.474 3/12/2004 (6,000,000) (6,000,000) (6,000,000) 1A74 IA74 3/15/2004 (700.000) (700.000) (700.000) 1.474 1.474 324/2004 (1,000.000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) 1.474 1.474 3252004 (5,100.000) (5,100,0()0) (5,100,000) 1.474 1.474 3262004 (2,600.000) (2,600,000) (2,600,000) IA74 1.474 Total Withdrawls (16,100,000) (16,100.000) (16,100,000) IA74 1.474 Balance Mamh 31,2004 $18,628,614 $18,628,614 $18,628,614 1A74 1,474 P I M C O April 12,2004 Mr.Mike White,CPA Controller Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708-7018 Dear Mike: The following is a description of events in the bond markets during the month of March in addition to an analysis of the strategies undertaken in the Orange County Sanitation District's Long-Term,Liquid, and COP Proceeds portfolios over the period. Also included is a section on our outlook and preferred strategies to be pursued in your portfolios during the coming months. Bond Marker Recap: U.S. Treasuries beat other core bond sectors in March as weak employment data pointed toward continued low inflation. Although U.S. Treasuries returned 0.94% for the month, these gains were not without some volatility. Yields on the benchmark 10-year Treasury opened the month at 3.99%, rallied to a low of 3.65% on March 17th then retreated, finishing at 3.840%. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities, or TIPS, outperformed nominal Treasuries; the Lehman Brothers U.S. TIPS index returned 1.60% in March. Mortgage-backed securities returned 0.44%, trailing Treasuries by 4 basis points after adjusting for duration. The credit sector, represented by the Lehman Credit Index, also trailed Treasuries for the month, returning 0.97%, or—6 basis points after adjusting for duration. Within the sector, higher quality investment grade corporates outperformed, with Aa-rated bonds beating like-duration Treasuries by 3 basis points, whereas Baa-rated issues lagged by 13 basis points. New language from the Federal Open Market Committee acknowledged the weak hiring market and reassured investors that the Fed would not hike interest rates in the near future. March began with another disappointing Employment Situation Report, issued by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The monthly report indicated that net payroll jobs increased by a paltry 21,000, well below consensus expectations of 128,000. The weak pace of hiring in service industries drove the disappointing results. Not surprisingly, the FOMC left rates unchanged the following week, however the Committee did alter its labor market assessment. The January phrase, "Although new hiring remains subdued, other indicators suggest an improvement in the labor market" was replaced by the less upbeat, "Although job losses have slowed, new hiring has lagged." On the Mr. Mike White, CPA April 12, 2004 Orange County Sanitation District Page 2 inflation front, the Commerce Department's final fourth quarter 2003 figures revealed that the core personal consumption expenditure(PCE)price deflator, which is a closely watched inflation metric by the Fed, was revised upward from 0.7% annually to 1.2%. Though still very low, the upward trend was viewed as a potential sign that accommodative monetary policies are starting to generate inflationary pressure. March closed with another positive economic sign—two separate indicators of consumer confidence, The University of Michigan's Index of Consumer Sentiment and the Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index, both posted headline figures that exceeded market expectations. Treasury yield changes during the month of March are summarized as follows: 3-month bills: unchanged at 0.940/a • 6-month bills: -1 basis point to 0.990/6 • 2-year notes: -7 basis points to 1.57% 5-year notes: -16 basis points to 2.78% • 10-year notes: -14 basis points to 3.84% 30-year notes: -7 basis points to 4.77% Peribrrnanee Attribution: Long-Term Portfolio The Long-Term portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District generated a total return of 0.44 percent for the month of March, lagging the Merrill Lynch 1-5 year Govcmment Corporate Index by 12 basis points. The following points summarize returns for the period ended March 31: • The Long-Term portfolio lagged the benchmark by 12 basis points for the month. • For the twelve-month period, the Long-Term portfolio returned 3.59%,underperforming the benchmark by 25 basis points. • Portfolio duration,below the index,was negative for monthly performance as rates fell across most maturities. • Yield curve positioning similar to that of the index was neutral for performance. • An underweight exposure to corporates was positive for performance,as the credit sector underperformed Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis. • Exposure to mortgage-backed securities was negative for relative performance as the sector slightly underperformed Treasuries on a duration-adjusted basis. • Substituting Treasury Inflation Protected Securities for nominal Treasuries was positive as TIPS outperformed nominals during the month. Mr. Mike White, CPA April l2, 2004 Orange County Sanitation District Page 3 Liquid Portfolio The Liquid portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District generated a total return of 0.08 percent during the month of March,performing in line with the 3- month Treasury Bill Index for the month. The following points summarize returns for the period ending March 31: • The Liquid portfolio performed in line with the benchmark for the month. • For the twelve-month period,the Liquid portfolio returned 1.12%,outperforming the benchmark by 12 basis points. • Use of higher yielding securities such as commercial paper and short-term notes contributed to performance. "2003 COP Proceeds—Future Construction"Portfolio The COP Proceeds portfolio that PIMCO manages on behalf of Orange Comfy Sanitation District generated a total return of 0.00 percent during the month of March, performing in line with the 3- month Treasury Bill Index. The following points summarize returns for the period ending March 31: • The Liquid portfolio performed in line with the benchmark for the month. • Use of higher yielding securities such as commercial paper and short-term notes contributed to performance. Outlook and S�rateev: The global recovery, centered in the U.S. and Asia, will continue for the next 6 to 12 months. Policymakers will press forward with reflationary measures that will delay a painful unwinding of economic imbalances. Excess capacity in labor and product markets worldwide will keep inflation quiet, leading to range-bound interest rates over the next two quarters. The ten-year Treasury yield will fluctuate between 4.0 and 4.5 percent over this time frame. Elements of temporary stability include: • In the U.S.,consumer spending will hold up as out refunds boost after-tax disposable income.This mppon for the consume will be temporary,however,as individual not benefits are set to phase out by the second half of 2004. Restocking of low inventory levels by companies will provide a more durable boost to growth in the U.S. • The Federal Reserve will raise currently negative real short-term rates only when it is convinced that disinflation has ended and U.S.employment growth is both substantial and sustainable.Financial markets could begin discounting such a positive scenario within 12 months,pushing the yield on the 10-year Treasury toward 5 percent. • China will remain a contributor to global demand,though its growth rate will slow as policymakers engineer a wit landing for its potentially overheated economy.A significant currency revaluation in China is unlikely over the next 6 to 12 months as China's de facto monetary union with America sores both countries'interests. Mr. Mike White, CPA Apri112. 2004 Orange County Sanitation District Page 4 • Europe will remain the laggard in the global economy. While exports to China and emerging Europe are accelerating,recent gains in business confidence have peaked and consumer sentiment is weak.The balance of risks tilts toward more easing by the European Central Bank. The economic environment is unusually difficult to forecast because near-term stability could erode quickly if structural imbalances unwind faster than expected. Full valuations in core sectors such as mortgages and corporates pose considerable risk in this setting. PIMCO will continue to underweight the corporate sector and maintain reduced exposure to the mortgage sector, while looking for better opportunities outside the index. We will target below-benchmark duration but intend to move toward a neutral stance as rates trend upward. Curve positioning will favor shorter maturities as the Fed will anchor this end of the yield curve. We will also hold intermediate issues to enhance yield given a steep yield curve. We look forward to discussing these and other topics with you in the near future. Best regards, _s—c .,T elL Gi s ^Vlq Yy� ca+ Christine Telish,CFA John M. Miller, CFA Vice President Senior Vice President Orange County Sanitation District for the month ending March 31,2004 Total Return Account-203 With ed Interest wMoulA ddd Irene, Market Value 392.740.226 389.664,392 Boak Vatee 386,106,586 383.030.752 Yield to MaWny 2.13 2,15 Short Term Account-603 with AmnedfInterest Wilhoul Accrue!Interest Markel Value 91,6191208 91,dah.mo Book Value 91.786.612 91.568.743 Yield to MaWnty 1.22 1.22 2003 COP Proceeds-Future Construction-2203 Wah Accrued Interest wlMutAmuetl lntemel Market Value 36.056.413 65.885.946 Boak Value 56.193.344 66.022.817 Yield to Maturiy 1.05 1.05 MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING&REPORTING ((or the month ended 31 March 2004) Page I of I Liquid Operating Monies(603) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Estimate: • PIMCO $91,619,208 • Mellon $91,616,868 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $91,786,612 • Mellon $91,820,163 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 0.15 Of Index: 0.20 15.13 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact ainfloss oft%Change: $137429 15.1.4 REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturina within 90 days: 73% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALITY Avenge Portfolio Credit Quality: "AAA" 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance Yes 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.08 0.08 3 Months: 0.26 0.23 12 Months: 1.12 1.00 Fiscal Year-to-Date: 0.80 0.72 Commentary ZLiquid ponfoh m nperfoe m d m[me with the bmchmmk for the omh and outperformed the bencbmmk by a basis points ficed yeerdodate. CO's emphasis on higher yielding securities such as commercial papa and shatdam noter cmmbuted b performance. x:Wepvmnsac,aexv�xawgorooaaalarraee MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING (for the month ended 31 March 2004) Page I of 3 Long-Term Operating Monies(203) 15.1.1 PORTFOLIO COST AND MARKET VALUE Current Market Value Esthnate: • PIMCO $392,740,226 • Mellon $392.730,278 Historical Cost: • PIMCO $386,106,586 • Mellon $387,096,325 15.1.2 MODIFIED DURATION Of Portfolio: 1.96 Of Index: 2.40 15.1.3 1%INTEREST RATE CHANGE Dollar Impact intloss of 1%Change: $7 697 708 MIA REVERSE REPOS %of Portfolio in Reverse Repos: see attached schedule 0% 15.1.5 PORTFOLIO MATURITY %of Portfolio Maturing within 90 days: 7% 15.1.6 PORTFOLIO QUALrl7Y Avenge Portfolio Credit Ouality., AAA 15.1.7 SECURITIES BELOW"A"RATING %of Portfolio Below"A": 0% 15.1.8 INVESTMENT POLICY COMPLIANCE "In Compliance" No" 15.1.9 PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE Total Rate of Return(%)by Portfolio Index Period: 1 Month: 0.44 036 3 Months: 1.53 1.66 12 Months: 3.59 3.94 Fiscal Year-to-Date: 2.11 2.15 • The Lang-Term portfolio lagged the benchmark by 12 basis Points fa the rmmlh,end legged Ilse benchmark by 4 basis points fiscal tar-to-dose. • Ponfolio duration,below the index,was negative for monthly Ix fomunm as nos fell across maturities. • Yield curve Positioning similar to out of 0a Was was neutral for Mromunce. • An underweight exposure to corporates was positive for perfonwice,as the conil sector underperfornud Treasuries on a duratienadjusted basis. • Exposure w mortgage-baked smunties was negative fm relative perfan ance as the sector slightly underperformed Treasuries on a dureuon-adjusud buis. • Subsuming Treasury Inflation Protected Securities for nomiral Treasuries was positive as TIPS outperfwmcd awash during the rmnth. MONTHLY REPORT ' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING (for the month ended 3/March 2004) Page 2 of 3 -Compliance Issues: $1,600,000 oar of United Airlines(UAL)Pass-Throueh 2001-1-C(Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificate(EETC)-909317BC2).6.831%coupon,9/1/2008 maturity,representing 0.4 1%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis was purchased on 8/10/2001;and subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A3 to BAI (on 9/18/2001)and S&P from A-to BBB(on 9/20/2001). The security was further downgraded by Moody's from BAI to BA3(on 12/21/2001)and by S&P from BBB to BB (on 6/28/02). Following news of the possible bankruptcy filing,the security was further downgraded in August(B3 Moody's,B+by S&P). On November 29,2002,S&P further downgraded this issue to B,and shortly thereafter on December 9,2002,downgraded the issue one notch further to B-. On August 7,2003,S&P downgraded the issue to CCC+,while Moody's followed suit on August 28,2003 with a downgrade to CA. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split. PIMCO continues to be part of a group that is negotiating directly with the company on behalf of bondholders. PIMCO is still limited in the information they can disclose at this point,as Some of the information in the negotiating process is iron-public,but they believe that continuing to hold the securities is the best strategy to maximize value. Currently,UAL is awaiting Senate action on pension reform legislation that would substantially reduce(for at least two years)the required contributions to its underfunded pension plans. The legislation,which is more beneficial to single-employer pension plans,contains special relief for UAL. Last week,the House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly in favor of the proposed legislation and now the bill awaits Senate vote. Employers are hoping that the bill passes next week. The relief is sought immediately because it would take effect before the next contribution date on April 15. It is possible that the Congressional passage of this legislation could accelerate the ATSB's approval of UAL's pending request for a federal loan guarantee. The guarantee would backstop$1.6 billion of a$2.0 billion exit-financing package. UAL reported improved operating results for the first two months of 2004. Operating losses year-to-date of$303 million represents an improvement of$335 million over the same period in 2003. Despite the seasonally weak first quarter,cash balances increased$205 million during February to$2.5 billion,of which$654 million is restricted cash. 51.000.000 oar of Philip Morris-Altria NT(ratio 718154CH8).4/1/2004 maturity,representing 0.26%of the portfolio holdings on a per basis was purchased on 8/6/2001 at a price of 105.26. This security was subsequently downgraded by Moody's from A2 to Ban I on 4/01/2003,end then from Baal to Bsa2 on 4/23/03, The security was downgraded by S&P from A-to BBB on 4/10/2003. The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split. In November,PIMCO sold$4,000,000 per(of the$5,000,000 original holding)at a price of 101.9 for a realized loss of$134,400. The Philip Morrie USA downgrade activity was a result of a negative counjudgment and its associated bonding requirement. In the Miles case,named after the initial plaintiff in the class-action lawsuit,an Illinois court fined Philip Morris$10.3 billion for allegedly deceiving smokers into thinking that"light'cigarettes were safer than regular cigarettes. The company,now a subsidiary of Altria,has said that the lawsuit was flawed and that it planned to appeal the ruling and the class certification order that preceded it. MONTHLY REPORT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT INVESTMENTMANAGEMENT PROGRAM PIMCO'S PERFORMANCE MONITORING& REPORTING (for the month ended 31 March 2004) Page 3 of 3 Prior to the judgment,PIMCO's analysis of Altria(the holding company and issuer of the debt)shows investment grade credit metrics even excluding in its entirety Philip Morris USA(the domestic tobacco subsidiary and the entity subject to all of the legal suits). The analysis was based on the assumption that the horizon of any final verdict would be years in the future,while the company would generate significant cash Bow in the interim. On November 24,Philip Morris was found not liable in a case brought by the wife of a man who smoked Marlboro cigarettes and died after developing long cancer, This case,as well as other recent court rulings have been in Altria's favor and continue to dampen the legal risks faced by the company. PIMCO believes Altria is unlikely to sacrifice good subsidiaries to fund the bad one,which would create a bad precedent for future court cases. PIMCO continues to hold their positions at the holding company(Altria)level,but have suspended any additional purchases until greater clarity emerges on the likelihood of various outcomes. Split Rated Securities Still In Con aliance, The District's investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody's or A-by S&P,with at least a BBB in the event of a split rating. •$3,500,000 par of Ford Motor Credit securities($2.5 million represented by cusip 345397SJ3 maturing 7116104 and$1 million represented by cusip 345397GV9 maturing 5/15/05),representing 0.90%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The securities were downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+,then to BBB on 10/25/02,and then to BBB-on l l/13/03. Moody's downgraded the securities on 1/16/02 from A2 to A3. •$3,000,000 par of General Motors Acceptance Corp securities(cusip 370425SD3)maturing on August 28,2007,representing 0.77%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The securities were downgraded on 10/16/2001 by S&P from A to BBB+,and a further downgrade to BBB occurring on 10/16/2002. The securities now carry a Moody's rating of A3 after a further downgrade from A2 on 6/14/03. •S 1,750,000 par of Virginia Electric Power NT securities(cusip 927804ENO),maturing in 2006,represents 0.45%of the portfolio holdings on a par basis. The security was downgraded on 10/21/2G02 by S&P from A-to BBB+,but continues to carry a Moody's rating of A3. ff.Ide AfW2201Geggh1£AHR1&7V806-04-93.RPT.dx Asset Summary Report to: OLS251 Base Currency: USE, Mellon by Asset Type with Sectors Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: LIQUID OPZR-PWC0-OCOV07511102 3 31 2004 s: FINAL Net Unrealized Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description BhereB Par Base Base Total Basa CASH a CASH EQUrVALENTS U.B.DOLLAR INTEREST 251,449.90 251,449.90 0.27% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK-LESS THAN IYR 13,200,000.000 13,161,643.54 13,161,643.54 14.37% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE-LESS THAN I YR 10,500,000.000 10,474,902.77 10,474,902.77 11.43% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN 1YR 17,500,000.000 17,450,547.79 17,450,547.79 19.05% 0.06 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,042,796.460 1,042,796.46 1,042,796.46 1.14% 0.00 REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS 18,200,000.000 18.200.000.00 18,200,000.00 19.87% 0.00 TREASURY BILLS-LESS THAN lYR 23,100,000400 22,989,043.00 22,989,043.00 25.09% 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR 83,842,796.460 83,570,383.46 83,570,383.46 91.22% 0.00 CASH a CASH EQUIVALENTS 83,542,796.460 83,570,383A8 $3.570,383.46 91.22% 0.00 FIRED INCOME SECURITIES Q.B.DOLLAR BANKING 6:FINANCE 6,902,000.000 7,123,874.38 6,945,310.15 7.58% -178,564.43 U.S.AGENCIES 1,100,000.000 1,125,905.00 1.101.174.25 1.20% -24.730.75 U.S. DOLLAR 8,002,000.000 8,249,779.58 8,046,484.40 8.78% -203,295.18 FMED INCOME SECURITIES 8,002,000.00O 8,249,779.58 8,046,484.40 6.78% -203,295.18 TOTAL ASSETS-BASE: 91,544,796.460 91,820,163.04 91,616,867.86 100.00% -203,295.18 41812004 8:13:1 IAM PDT ] Workbench Asset Summary aspect ID: OLS251 Base Currency: US. / Mellon by Asset Type with Sectors Alternate Base C.ncy: Exchange Hate: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO-OCSFID7522202 3 4 States: FINAL Not Unrealhted` Cost Market Value %Of Gain/Loss Description Sl arse Par Base Base Total Base CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR PENDING TRADES -2,839,011.27 -2,839,011.27 -0.72% 0.00 INTEREST 3,114,766.96 3,114,766.96 0.79% 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER-DISCOUNT 500,000.000 498,338.89 498,338.89 0.13% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES-LESS THAN IYR 13,500,000,000 13,459,599.37 13,459,599.37 3.43% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 1,079,017.300 1,079,017.30 1,079,017.30 0.27% 0.00 TREASURY BILLS- LESS THAN IYR 12,400,000.000 12,335,954.54 12,335,954.54 3.14% 0.00 U.B. DOLLAR 27,479,017.300 27,648,665.79 27,648,666.79 7.04% 0.00 CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS 27,479,017.300 27,648,665.79 27,648,665.79 7.04% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR ABS-AIRPLANE RECEIVABLES 1,600,000.000 1,600,000.00 329.280.00 0.08% -1,270,720.00 ABS-HOME EQUITY 963,373.960 963,373.96 953,976.07 0.25% 602.11 BANKING&FINANCE 16,700,000.000 16,776,633.00 17,379,536.00 4.43% 602,903.00 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATION COMM/1 2,241,342.070 2,241,342.07 2,456,398.84 0.63% 215,056.77 FHLMC MULTICLASS 1,015,139.090 1,016,220.57 1,055,988.29 0.27% 39,767.72 FHLMC POOLS 127,068.480 126,501.16 130.458.90 0.03% 3,957.74 FNMA POOLS 41,750,460,340 42,722,325.50 43,213,370.40 11.00% 491,G44.90 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 3,003,944.840 2,988,545.92 3,061,849.34 0.78% 73,303.42 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 8,083,887.560 8,193,098.64 8,530,604.51 117% 337,505.87 INDUSTRIAL 3,000,000.000 3,044,880.00 3,020,620.00 0.77% -24,260.00 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 34,479,210.000 34,496,129.79 38,986,935.62 9.93% 4,490,805.83 INSURANCE 1,600,000.000 1,594,032.00 1,708,000.00 0,43% 113,968.00 PVT PLACEMENTS-MORE THN IYR 752.000.000 826.199.84 826,199.84 0,21% 0.00 U.S.AGENCIES 38,056,882.820 39,289,828.98 40,424,454.23 10,29% 1,134,625.25 U.S.GOVERNMENTS 190,360,886,080 198,864,178.18 198,024,852.45 50.42% -839,325.73 UTILITY-ELECTRIC 4,750,000.000 4,694,370.00 4,969,087.50 1.27% 274,71Z50 U.S.DOLLAR 348,484,195.240 359,437,659.61 365,081,611.99 92.96% 5,643,952.38 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 348,484,195.240 359,437,659.61 365,081,611.99 92.96% 5,643,952.38 41812004 8:15:48AM PDT 1 Workbench Asset Summary Report ID: OL8251 •' Bane Currency: USD / Mellon by Asset Type with Sectors Alternate Base Cotton., Enchengo Rate: WO TERM OPER-PIMCO-OCSM7522202 3 31 004 s atn : FINAL BBC Unrealized Cost Market Value % of GalajLOBB Description Shares Par Base Base Total - :Base TOTAL ASSETS-BASE: 375,963,212.540 387,086,325.40 392,730,2T1.78 100.00% 6,643,952.38 4/8/2004 8:15:48AM PDT 2 Workbench YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE i 1 OCSF07511102 2004/03/31 RUN DATE 04/06/04 DISTRICT, LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME 1 11.04.29 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOB YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE B TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL HONE LN SEE CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.341 2,493,585.76 2.99 313384ML9 MAT 05/05/2004 A-1t 2,493,595.76 2.93 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.431 1,906,625.00 2.38 313384BA2 MAT 05/19/2004 A-14 1,988,625.00 2.10 1,700,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N .000 .000 P-1 99.743 1,695,702.70 2.03 313384BH1 MAT 05/26/2004 A-1♦ 1,695,302.7B 1.86 3,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS DISC N .000 .000 P-1 99.350 2.992,350.00 3.59 313384XKO HAT 05/28/2004 A-1• 2,992,750.00 3.28 4,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS DISC N .000 .000 P-1 99.335 3,990,980.00 4.39 313384BQ3 MAT 06/02/2004 A-I+ 31990,900.00 4.37 2,500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LH MTG CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.345 2,493,625.00 2.99 313396WKS MAT 5/4/2004 A-l+ 2,493,625.00 2.33 6,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MID CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.922 5,986,333.33 7.18 313396WS2 MAT 05/10/2004 A-1♦ 5,986,333.33 6.55 2,OOD,000.00 FEDERAL MOMS LN MM CORP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.747 1,994,944.44 2.39 313396BG3 HAT 05/25/2004 A-H 1,994,944.44 2.19 6,500,OOD.00 FEDERAL NAIL HTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.353 6,483,930.56 3.98 31350OWTO MAT 05/12/2004 A-19 6,483,930.56 7.10 9,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MM ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.681 8.931,301.67 10.36 313588"8 MAT 05/19/20G4 A-I♦ 8,971,301.62 9.82 2,000,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL MM ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.366 1,995,315.56 2.39 3135B8BQ3 MAT 06/02/2004 A-l9 1,995,315.56 2.18 23,100,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL .000 .000 P-1 99.520 22,999,043.00 23.59 912395QW4 DUE O6/05/2DO4 DD 02/05/2004 A-l3 22,909,043.00 25.16 18,200,000.00 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO .000 .920 IOD.000 10,200,000.00 21.04 9941BJ221 00.9201 04/01/2004 DD 03/31/04 18,200,000.00 19.92 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 2 OCSP07521102 2004/03/31 RUN DATE 1 04/06/04 DISTRICTI LIQUID OPERATING RUN TIME t II.04.29 PAR VALUE YTH AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY 10 SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 1 TOTAL 1,042,796.46 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH NGHT .000 .819 AAA 100.00D 1,042,796.46 1.25 996085247 AAA 1,042,796.46 1.14 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS .000 .039 83,318,933.56 100.00 83,310,933.56 91.20 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 100,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP HA MTN SR00043 .000 3.331 M1 101.943 104,199.00 1.26 045906BU7 3.92G9 07/13/2004 DO 07/13/94 AA- IUI,843.00 .11 1,000,000.00 ASSOCIATES CORP NORTH AMER .000 5.I00 BAY 100.201 1,041,290.00 12.45 046003KA6 5.0001 04/20/2004 DO 04/20/59 AA- 1,002,030.00 1.10 500,000.00 BANK OF AMERICA CORP SR GBL HT .000 6.554 AA2 101.078 518,305.00 6.28 066050CH3 1.6251 06/15/2004 DO 06/15/99 Af 505,39D.00 .55 1,100,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB .000 3.746 AAA 100.107 1,125,905.00 13.60 3134A4PH1 3.2501 04115/20D4 DO 04/15/02 AAA 1,101,174.25 1.21 100,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN In 00448 .OD0 3.216 AAA 100.460 103,801.60 2.24 36962GUR3 3.2501 05/03/2004 DO D5/01/00 AAA 180,842.40 .20 1,000,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN ITR 00545 .000 1.210 AAA 100.031 1,001,O69.00 12.43 36962GY83 VAR RT D5/2012004 DO DS/20/02 AAA 1,000,310.00 1.09 I,DOO,000.00 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS INC .000 6.625 Al 100.000 1,045,590.00 12.42 52490BB12 6.625% 04/01/2004 DD 03/26/99 A I,000,000.00 1.09 250,000.00 NCNB TEX NAIL BK DALLAS TEX HT .000 9.381 AA2 101.265 260,870.00 3.14 628857DJ0 9.500% 06/OI/2D04 DO 06/01/09 A. 253,162.50 .28 600,000.00 RATIONSBANK CORP .000 7.536 AA3 102.296 615,546.00 3.62 638585"8 7.7501 09/15/2004 A 613.776.00 .63 627,000.00 HATIONSBANK CORP SR HIS .000 6.042 AA2 101.375 646,150.18 3.99 638585BJI 6.M% 02/15/IDG4 DO 07/23/10 Aa 635,621_25 .70 520,00D.00 HORNSBY FINE, INC NTS .000 3.200 BAY 100.000 531,538.80 6.46 669303DG3 7.2001 04/D1/2004 DO 04/07/97 AA- 520,000.00 .57 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE s 3 OCSF07511102 2004/03/31 RUN DATE s 04/06/04 DISTRICTS LIQUID OPERATING RUS TINE t 11.04.29 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 0 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S—P PRICE RAREST VALUE 6 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 1.00010DO.00 US BANCORP NIN 6TR 00119 .000 5.967 AA3 100.546 1,046,310.00 12.69 91159BE12 6.0009 05/15/2004 US 05/10/99 A. 1,005,660.00 1.10 125,000.00 WELLS FARGO 6 CO NEW NE .000 6.527 AA 101.500 128,605.00 1.57 969766AA9 6.1351 07/15/2004 DD 07/20/99 AA— 126r975.00 .16 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL FIXED INCORE SECURITIES .000 5.269 B,269r779.50 100.00 8,046,604.40 8.81 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL .000 .622 91,568,713.14 100.00 91,]65,617.96 100.00 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 4 OOSP07522202 2004/03/31 RUN DATE 1 04/06/04 DISTRICTI LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME , 11.04.29 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 6 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 6 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ ---------- CASH 6 CASH EOUIVALENTS 60D,OOO.DG FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.050 598,SOO.00 2.18 31350OXAB MAT 05/19/2004 A-1♦ 590,500.00 .15 500,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.029 499,147.50 1.82 313586XB6 MAT O5/20/2004 A-1♦ 499,147.50 .13 3,100,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MM ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.745 3,590,009.00 13.11 313588KG3 MAT 06/02/2004 A-14 3,590,609.00 .11 0,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT .000 .000 P-1 99.632 0,331,142.97 32.04 313588YVI MAY O7/01/2004 A-I+ 8,111,142.07 2.23 500,000.00 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC .000 .000 P-1 99.669 490,339.89 1.92 36959HGBG 07/09/2004 498,338.09 .13 8,000,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL .000 .000 P-1 99.484 7,958,746.66 29.03 912395PM5 0.0009 04/29/2004 DD 10/30/03 A-II 7,950,746.66 2.03 4,400,000.00 U S TREASURY BILL .000 .000 P-1 99.482 4,333,207.00 15.99 912395PX3 0.0001 05/06/2004 DD 11/D6/03 A-l+ 4,377,207.80 1.12 1,039,GI7.30 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT .000 .919 AAA 100.000 1,079,017.30 3.94 996005247 AAA 1,079,017.30 .23 TOTAL CASH 6 CASH EQUIVALENTS .000 .008 27,372,910.10 100.00 27,372,910.10 6.99 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 752,000.00 AID SUMAKERICA GLOBAL REG S .000 5.325 109.867 816,199.84 .22 000907MO 5.8501 08/01/2000 DD O9/00/01 826,199.94 .21 2,000,000.00 COMMIT TO PUN PORN SP MTG .000 5.369 AAA 102.438 2,075,250.00 .79 01FOS2649 5.5001 04/01/2034 DD 04/01/04 BAR 2,060,250.00 .33 1,500,000.00 CIT GROUP INC NEW SR NT .000 5.060 Al 100.703 1,523,135.00 .44 125501AD0 5.500% 11/30/2007 DD 12/02/02 A 1,630,545.00 .42 5D,911.91 FMLMC GROUP 4G4-0353 .000 3.432 AAA 100.912 52,206.30 .01 3128DSMA2 3.5006 10/01/2004 DD 03/01/99 AAA 51,382.37 .01 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 5 MSP07522202 2004/03/31 RUN DATE 04/06/04 DISTRICTI LONG-TERN OPEMATING RUN TIME 11.04.29 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE E TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 3.500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS BOB .000 6.380 AAA 105.082 3.993.625.00 2.15 3133MAUN9 9.125% 02/15/2005 DD 02/08/00 AAA 7,881,122.25 2.01 76,150.57 FHLMC GROUP 138-6064 .000 3.262 AAA 103.842 74,294.39 .02 31348SWE3 6.3841 01/01/2028 DD 12/01/97 AAA 79,076.53 .02 11,350,000.00 FEDERAL NATL MM ASSN DEBS .000 4.894 AAA 107.267 11,521,271.50 3.33 31359MJK2 5.250E 06/15/2006 DD 06/22/01 AAA 12.134.855.58 3.10 903,049.48 FNNA POOL 002545/0 .000 4.043 AAA 103.160 827,964.96 .22 31371KVB4 5.000% 11/01/2017 DO 10/01/02 AAA 829,252.41 .21 171,411.27 FNMA POOL #0254631 .000 4.849 AM 103.160 176,552.61 .04 31371KY47 5.000% 02/01/2018 DO 01/01/03 AAA 176,828.14 .05 154,119.90 FNHA POOL 10254760 .000 4.844 AAA 3D3.223 158,742.46 .04 31371KSV9 5.0001 06/01/2010 DO 05/01/03 AAA 159,085.63 .04 67,822.73 MEN, POOL 10254866 .000 4.044 AAA 103.223 69,857.42 .01 313)1LCB3 5.000% 09/01/2010 DO 00/01/0) AAA 70,008.43 .02 357,031.18 FNMA POOL 10254953 .000 4.844 AAA 103.223 361,605.65 .10 31371LE21 5.000% 11/01/2018 DO 10/01/03 AAA 368,537.00 .09 962.1)).73 PNHA POOL 10254987 .000 4.858 AAA 102.932 979,569.69 .23 31371LF46 5.D00% 12/01/2010 DO 11/01/03 AM 995,537.03 .2S 152,417.27 FNMA POOL 10323900 .000 5.635 AAA 105.727 200,895.65 .05 31334T2MO 6.000% 04/01/2014 DO 09/01/99 AAA 2U3:436.16 .05 30,286.71 FNHA POOL 40357320 .000 4.857 AAA 102.953 31,195.36 .00 31376J4MB 5.000% 01/01/2018 DO 01/01/03 AAA 31,101.06 .01 1,544,014.91 FNMA POOL #0357430 .000 4.054 AAA 101.004 1,561,385.09 .43 11336RA31 5.000% 09/01/2D10 DO 09/01/03 AAA 1,590,395.73 .41 60,341.64 ERNA POOL #0456482 .000 5.635 AAA ID5.)2) 63,000.44 .01 31381CCT2 6.000% 02/01/2014 DO 02/01/99 AAA 63,797.14 .02 148,561.08 FNNA POOL #0509649 .000 5.635 AM ID5.)2] 155,107.06 .04 31383QEWO 6.000% 09/01/2014 DO 09/01/99 AAA 157.068.52 .04 152,452.95 FNMA POOL #0535451 .000 5.692 AAA 105.602 159,170.41 .04 31384VZQB 6.000% 06/01/2015 DO 07/01/00 HAS. 160,992.69 .04 YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 6 OCSF01522202 2004/03/31 RUN DATE 04/06/04 DISTRICT, TANG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 11.04.29 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOB YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 1 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 3,278,934.53 PNNA POOL 00535672 .000 5.675 AAA 105.727 3,423,412.60 .94 31384WCHI 6.000% 01/01/2016 DO 12/02/00 AAA 3,466,704.60 .88 1,060,143.49 FNMA POOL 00545296 .000 5.678 AAA 105.664 IIIO6,856.D6 .30 31385NK20 6.000% 11/01/2016 DO 10/01/01 AAA 1,120,190.65 .29 80,344.73 FNKA POOL 10545580 .000 5.658 AAA 106.039 92,237.41 .02 11385JCR3 6.000% 03/01/2017 DO 03/01/02 AAA 93,679.92 .02 161,526.34 FNMA POOL 1055510/ .000 5.665 AAA 105.914 168.654.D2 .04 3136SW21 6.000% 10/01/2017 DO 11/01/02 AAA 171,089.00 .04 368,911.79 FMMA POOL 10555363 .000 4.854 AAA 103.004 379,979.14 .10 31385M5Y1 5.000% 04/01/20I8 DO 03/01/03 AAA 379,993.57 .10 37,084.12 PUMA POOL 10555453 .000 4.847 AAA 103.160 30,369.51 .01 31385BBM6 S.00DB 05/01/2018 DO 04/01/03 AAA 39,081.32 .01 307,445.74 FNMA POOL #0555545 .000 4.854 AAA 103.004 316,669.12 .08 31385BES2 5.0001 06/D1/2018 DO 05101103 AAA 316.601.13 .08 1.065,954.33 FNNA POOL 10555621 .000 4.85E AAA 102.932 1.O73,946.31 .3D 31395XG60 5.000% 07/O1/2018 DO 06/01/D3 AAA 1,097,209.93 .28 63,908.17 FNMA POOL 10576386 .000 5.698 AAA 105.301 66,724.12 .01 31386XJ72 6.000% 05/01/2016 DO 05/01/01 AAA 67,296.15 .02 151,190.02 FNMA POOL 10576739 .000 5.665 AAA 105.914 157,851.83 .04 31306XV86 6.000% 04/01/2016 DO 04/01/01 AAA 160,131.49 .04 213,871.90 "MA POOL #0590886 .000 5.659 AAA 106.039 223,295.62 .06 31383DJ91 6.000% 05/01/2016 OD 05/01/01 AAA 226,787.75 .06 163,178.63 FNMA POOL 10594002 .000 5.678 AAA 105.664 170,369.60 .04 31387T3K8 6.000% 07/01/2016 DO 07/01/01 AAA 172,421.17 .04 232,066.77 FNHA POOL #0597176 .000 5.678 AAA I05.664 242,292.21 .06 31387XT96 6.000% 09/01/2016 DO 08/01/01 AAA 245,211.17 .06 137,840.23 FNMA POOL 10605259 .ODO 5.638 AAA 105.664 143,913.02 .03 31368HKGI 6.000% 09/01/2016 DO 09/01/01 AAA 145,647.58 .04 86,130.19 ENNA POOL 00608366 .000 5.678 AAA 105.664 89,925.30 .02 313BOLZ78 6.DOO1 10/01/2016 DO 09/01/01 AAA 91,008.66 .02 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE . 3 OCSF03522202 2004/03/31 RUN DATE t 04/06/04 DISTRICT. LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME 1 11.04.29 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ % TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE % TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 168,429.9➢ FNMA POOL 006/6734 .000 5.652 AAA 106.164 175,851.41 .04 31389NCF9 6.0001 12/01/2016 DO 12/01/01 AAA 170,212.09 .05 159,806.24 FNMA POOL 10630012 .000 5.693 AAA 105.323 166,847.70 .04 31389NYN2 6.000% 02/01/2017 OD 02/01/02 AAA 160,312.08 .04 371,604.33 FNMA POOL 00632376 .000 5.665 AAA 105.914 BD5,603.62 .22 313890050 6.000% 07/01/2D17 DD O7/02/02 AAA 917,237.94 .21 439,281.71 FNMA POOL 00653116 .000 5.665 AAA 105.914 450,637.56 .12 313900SD8 6.000% 07/01/2017 DO 07/01/02 AAA 465,261.09 .12 186,401.45 FNMA POOL 40673280 .000 5.665 AAA 105.914 294,690.29 .05 31391P6R2 6.000% O0/Ol/2011 DO 11/01/02 AAA 197,510.07 .OS 557,907.17 FNMA POOL 00601309 .000 4.854 AAA 103.004 574,644.38 .15 31391Y3S4 5.000% D2/01/20I8 DO 02/01/03 AAA 574,666.20 .15 69,784.18 FNMA POOL 10681334 .000 4.054 AAA 103.004 71,833.70 .01 31391Y4T1 5.000% 02/01/2018 DO 01/O1/03 AAA 72,880.43 .02 346,982.23 FNMA POOL 10684908 .ODD 4.047 AAA 103.110 351,427.94 .01 31400D3R1 5.000% 06/01/2010 DO 05/01/03 AAA 357,947.42 .09 196,909.15 FNMA POOL #0685200 .ODD 4.854 AAR 103.004 199,432.06 .05 31400EGN3 5.0001 03/01/2019 US 03/01/03 AAA 202,824.12 .05 35,411.02 PNMA POOL 00685665 .000 4.854 AAA 103.004 36,473.35 .00 31400EW22 5.000% 02/O1/2019 US 02/01/03 AAA 36,474.74 .01 299,409.16 PUMA POOL 10666318 .000 4.854 AAA ID3.D04 308,391.43 .00 31400FP07 5.000% 03/01/2018 DO O3101/03 AAA 306,403.14 .00 116,331.81 FNMA POOL 10688739 .000 4.854 AAA 103.004 119,821.76 .03 3140DJEL9 5.000% 06/01/2018 DO 06/01/03 AAA 119,826.31 .03 119,332.89 FNMA POOL #0689859 .000 4.044 AAA 103.223 120,861.04 .03 3140DKMGB 5.000% 0510112019 DO 05/01/03 AAA 123,170.58 .03 715,269.33 FNMA POOL #0693834 .000 4.054 AAA 103.DG4 036,727.41 .20 3140DPY74 5.0001 03/01/2010 DD 03/01/03 AAA 236,155.38 .19 261,890.42 PNMA POOL 1069SB52 .000 4.954 AAA 103.D04 269,341.13 .07 324005BV0 5.000% 05/01/2018 DO 05/01/03 AAA 269,757.37 .03 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t B MSF01522202 2004/03/31 RON DATE 04/06/04 DISTRICTS TANG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIME t 11.04.29 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD 0-P PRICE MARKET VALUE B TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 815,674.08 FNRA POOL 10695089 .DOD 4.854 AAA 103.004 640,144.30 .23 31400SC23 5.000% 05/DI/2018 DO 05/01/03 AAA 840,176.20 .21 25,670.71 PUMA POOL 60697026 .000 4.854 AAA 103.004 26,440.05 .00 3140OTLF2 5.000% 05/OI/2018 DO 04/01/03 AAA 26,441.84 .Dl 90,452.55 FNMA POOL #0698939 .000 5.658 AAA 106.039 94,430.12 .02 31400VPY2 6.0001 09/01/2017 DO 03/01/03 AAA 95,915.03 .D2 260,477.71 FNMA POOL 10702210 .000 4.050 AAA 102.932 268.2P2.D4 .07 31401ADP9 5.000% 05/01/2010 DO 05/01/03 AAA 269,115.36 .07 145,689.05 FNMA POOL 10702320 .000 4.954 AAA 101.004 147,555.70 .04 31401AND2 5.000% 05/01/2018 DO 04/01/03 AAA 150,065.42 .04 33,242.94 FMMA POOL ID703195 .000 5.668 AAA 105.852 00,646.46 .02 31401BGC3 6.0001 01/01/2017 DO 04/01/03 AAA 81,762.86 .02 295,651.93 FNMA POOL #0709148 .000 4.954 AAA 103.004 304,521.49 .08 31401REN7 5.DD01 06/01/2018 DO 06/01/03 AAA 304,533.05 .08 688,069.30 FNMA POOL 10709260 .000 4.044 AAA 103.223 696,085.20 .19 3140IJB56 5.000% 07/01/2DIB DO 06/01/03 AAA 710,243.43 .19 135,927.90 FNMA POOL J0709926 .000 4.854 AAA 103.004 130,669.45 .03 31401JSP4 5.000% 06/01/2010 DO 06/01/03 AAA 140,011.03 .04 259,385.05 FNMA POOL 10709917 .000 4.854 AAA 103.004 261,695.60 .03 31401JVJ4 5.000% 06/01/2029 DO 06/01/03 AAA 266,146.70 .03 26,357.17 MM POOL 10709963 .000 4.950 AAA 102.932 26,694.00 .00 31401JMY0 5.0001 06/01/2010 DO 06/01/03 AAA 27,130.01 .01 765,590.59 FNMA POOL 10710235 .000 4.854 AAA 103.004 788,558.32 .21 314019MB 5.000% 06/01/2018 DO 06/01/03 AAA 788,588.24 .2D 23,099.00 FNMA POOL 00713344 .000 4.854 AAA 103.004 24,616.05 .00 31401NP52 5.000% 06/01/2018 DO 06/01/03 AAA 24,617.00 .01 323,167.81 FNMA POOL J0713365 .000 4.054 AAA 103.OD4 327,308.40 .09 31401NQSI 5.000% 07/01/2010 DO 07/01/03 AAA 332,035.48 .08 991,032.60 FARE POOL 10720319 .000 4.854 AAA 103.DD4 903,259.20 .25 31401NG45 5.000% 07/01/2010 DD 07/01/03 AM 918,622.45 .23 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 9 MSFD7522202 20D4/D3/31 RUN DATE t 04/06/04 DISTRICT: LONG-TERN OPERATING RUN TINE : 11.04.29 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY NARRBT TOTAL COST/ 8 TYPE SECURITY TO SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE JIMMY VALUE 8 TUT" _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __-______- 2,380,561.51 FNRA POOL 10720369 .000 4.058 AAA 102.932 2,451,978.36 .60 314OIWJNO 5.000% 06/01/2010 DO 06/01/03 AAA 2,450,363.64 .62 306,069.73 PUNA POOL 10721629 .000 4.035 AAA 103.410 315,251.03 .00 31403AVN4 5.000% 07/01/2018 DO 06/01/03 AAA 316,503.20 .08 250,321.15 FNMA POOL 10223483 .000 4.854 AAA 103.004 253,137.27 .07 31402AX04 5.000% 06/01/2019 DO 06/01/03 AAA 257,840.57 .07 417,487.21 PNNA POOL 1072960/ .000 4.844 AAA 103.223 422,636.27 .11 314029RN3 5.000% OVOI/2018 DO G2/01/03 AAA 430,941.40 .11 36,173.18 PNMA POOL 10732973 .000 4.038 AAA 103.348 36,636.64 .01 31402MFNS 5.000% 11/01/2018 DO 10/01/03 AAA 37,384.14 .01 730,063.69 MMA POOL 00737130 .000 4.044 AAA 103.223 739,417,63 .20 3140IS09 5.0001 10/01/201B DO 10/01/03 AAA 753,591.16 .19 576,944.79 PNNA POOL #0738211 .000 4.058 AAl1 102.932 584,336.91 .16 31402UD02 5.0006 20/01/2010 DO 10/01/03 AAA 593,861.90 .15 215,799.15 PURA POOL f0730407 .000 4.854 AAA 103.004 218,564.07 .06 31402UNCi 5.000% 10/01/2018 DO 10/01/03 AAA 222,201.56 .06 691,271.15 PNMA POOL #0740471 .000 4.050 AAA 102.932 700,120.05 .19 31402NT40 S.ODOB 10/01/2010 DO 10/01/03 AAA 711,540.40 .18 820,597.82 FNMA POOL J0740740 .ODD 4.854 AAA 103.004 831,111.72 .23 31402NSB3 5.0001 10/01/2012 OD 11/01/03 AAA 845,242.04 .22 43,335.92 PUNA POOL 00743860 .ODD 4.858 AAA 102.932 43,891.16 .01 31403BMRI 5.000E 11/01/2018 OD 10/01/03 AAA 44,606.60 .01 1,137,791.00 FNMA POOL 10744000 .ODD 4.854 AAA 103.004 1,152,369.02 .32 31403BR54 5.000% 07/01/2010 DO 09/01/03 AAA 1,171,969.30 .30 160,300.65 FORA POOL 10744316 .ODD 4.050 AAA 102.932 170,457.01 .04 3/4038354 5.000E 09/01/2010 DO 09/01/03 AAA 173,235.51 .04 358,341.36 FNMA POOL 10747914 .000 4.854 AAA 103.004 362,932.62 .10 31403P3T0 5.000% 11/01/2018 DO 11/01/03 AAA 369,105.61 .09 241,353.53 PNMR POOL 10748400 .000 4.858 AAA 102.932 244,445.08 .06 31403GNR9 5.000% 00/01/2010 OD 09/01/03 AM 240,430.43 .06 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 10 OCBP07522202 2004/03/31 RON DATE 1 04/06/04 DISTRICT, LONG-TERN OPERATING RON TINE t 11.04.29 ovvovoovevvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvcvcvecccnvncvvvcvvevvvvvv.vveeavvvvuvvevnnuuncnncvnvvnnuccvvevvvSeev..................nnveev.... PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION NOOK YIELD B-P PRICE MARKET VALUE B TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ __________ 1,016,121.71 PENA POOL 1074BO99 .000 4.859 AAA 102.902 1,029,140.76 .28 31403G7LO 5.000% 12/01/2018 DO 11/01/03 AAA 1,045,610.58 .27 2r5ll,009.62 MRS POOL 10750373 .00D 4.B59 AAA 102.902 2r543,181.93 .30 31403JUA2 5.000% 11/01/2010 DO 11/01/03 AAA 2,SB3,881.63 .66 2,067,507.55 FNMA POOL #0750380 .000 4.859 AAA 102.902 2,093,997.51 .50 31403JUD6 5.0001 ll/Ol/2018 DO 11/O1/D3 AAA 2,I22,SOB.69 .54 191,850.62 FNMA POOL 10750445 .000 4.059 ARE 102.902 194,308.70 .05 31403JME2 5.000% 11/01/2010 DO 11/01/03 AAA 197,419.32 .05 886,983.01 PUNA POOL 10751960 .000 4.056 AAA 102.932 896,347.48 .25 314031,RN1 5.0001 12/01/2010 DO 11/01/03 AAA 912,990.67 .23 956,360.34 FNMA POOL 10753425 .000 4.854 ARE 101.004 967,418.25 .26 31403NA23 5.000% 11/01/20I8 DO 21/01/03 ARE 985,0B8.54 .25 626,778.08 FNMA POOL #0755165 .000 4.844 AAA 103.223 634,809.4E .17 3140306A3 5.0001 12/01/2018 DO 11/01/03 AAA 646,973.83 .16 983,689.85 FNRA POOL f0756372 .000 4.844 AAA 103.223 995,063.76 .22 31403SJN8 5.000% 11/01/2019 DO 11/01/03 AAA 1,015,390.83 .26 297,905.26 GNMA POOL 60596612 .000 6.138 AAA 105.091 312,660.B3 .09 362008YR4 6.5001 09/15/2032 DO 09/01/02 AAA 315,453.73 .00 1,055,308.12 GNMA POOL 90569358 .000 6.160 AAA 10S.514 1,080,041.90 .30 362000GK3 6.500% 04/15/2032 DO 04/01/02 MA 1,113,601.81 .28 45,625.27 GNMA POOL 10569665 .DOD 6.13B AAA 105.991 47,085.14 .01 3620002S2 6.5DOB 02/15/2032 DO 02/01/02 AAA 48,312.8E .01 78,367.74 GNNA POOL 1OS30019 .000 6.130 AAA 105.891 02,249.40 .02 3620OR048 6.500E 07/15/2032 DO 07/01/02 ARE B2,964.09 .02 415,105.55 CUM POOL 10574323 .000 6.138 AAA 105.992 456,656.08 .12 36200NAY3 6.5001 12/15/2031 DO 12/01/01 AAA 460,135.96 .12 44,315.46 GNMA POOL 10525364 .000 6.138 AAA IOS.991 46,510.46 .01 3620OKPD6 6.5001 11/25/2031 DO 11/01/01 ARA 46,925.92 .01 19,200.94 GNMA POOL 00507117 .000 6.138 ASA 105.891 2D,151.99 .DO 362DING22 6.5001 06/15/2032 DO 06/01/02 AAA 20,332.99 .01 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 1 11 OCSF07522202 2004/03/31 RUN DATE 1 04/06/04 DISTRICT. LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIME . 21.04.29 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT MOODY MARKET TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOK YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE / TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 55,330.44 GNNA POOL 60587439 .000 6.140 MA 105.859 58,532.81 .01 3620IMS45 6.5001 11/15/2032 DO 12/01/02 AAA 59,030.24 .02 13,50.09 GNM POOL #0421309 .DDO 6.119 AAA 106.234 14,234.90 .00 36206UC23 6.50D1 04/15/2026 OD 04/01/96 AAA 14,408.66 .00 22,798.13 GNNA POOL 10449851 .000 6.151 AAA 105.6I3 23,927.35 .00 36209TNL0 6.500% 01/15/2028 DO 01/01/98 AM 24,092.37 .01 57,238.08 GNM POOL /0466845 .000 6.126 MA 106.109 60,073.15 .Dl 36209STAG 6.500% 06/IS/202B DO 06/DI/98 MA 60,734.97 .D2 112,792.66 GNNA POOL 40468052 .000 6.126 AAA 106.109 118,379.64 .03 36209CSM4 6.5001 07/15/2028 DO 07/01/96 MA 119,683.90 .03 173,436.16 GNMA POOL ID476041 .000 6.126 AAA 106.109 101,755.60 .05 36209M8EI 6.500% D6115/2020 DO 06/01/9B AM 104,032.03 .05 163,642.52 GNNA POOL 10470626 .000 6.126 AM 106.109 171,492.25 .04 36209GVT9 6.500% 01/15/2029 DO 01/01/99 AAA 173,640.06 .04 122,664.99 GNMA POOL 1048059E .000 6.126 MA 106.109 120,549.O8 .03 3620053P6 6.5001 10/15/2029 DO 10/01198 MA 130,159.06 .03 413,548.04 GNMA POOL 10465527 .000 6.13E AAA 105.892 434,031.60 .11 36209YLG1 6.500% 06/15/2031 DO 06/01/01 AAA 437,908.58 .11 456,736.00 GNM POOL J0495610 .000 6.130 MA 1D5.891 479,358.79 .13 36209YN30 6.500% 07/15/2031 DO 07/01/01 MA 403,640.67 .12 08,433.90 GNM POOL #0485602 .000 6.13E AAA 10S.B91 92,014.14 .02 36209YM6 6.SU01 O8/25/2031 DO 00/01/01 AAA 93,643.21 .02 72,697.57 GNM POOL 10485703 .000 6.138 AAA 105.991 76,290.37 .02 36209YRY6 6.500% 00/15/2031 DO 00/01/01 AM 76,979.91 .02 10,007.03 GNNA POOL #0512235 .000 6.131 AAA 106.016 11,426.21 .00 36211GBC6 6.500% 11/15/2029 DD 11/01/99 AM 11,541.95 .00 141,394.01 GNNA POOL 10524326 .000 6.131 AAA 106.016 148,177.34 .04 36211GLP2 6.500% 07/15/2029 DD 07/01/99 AM 149,900.50 .04 46,750.56 GNMA POOL 10530053 .000 6.159 AM 105.529 49,066.1E .01 36212C883 6.500% 04/15/2031 DO 04/O1/01 MA 49,335.53 .01 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 12 OCSP03522202 2004/03/31 RUN DATE t 04/06/04 DISMICTi TANG-TERM OPERATING RUN TINE 11.04.29 PAR VALUE YTN AT CURRENT BOGGY RAREST TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BODE YIELD N-P PRICE MAREET VALUE S TOTAL 104,672.66 GNNA POOL 00537985 .000 6.138 AAA 105.991 109,857.22 .03 36212HREI 6.500% 02/IS/2031 DO 02/01/01 AAA 110,038.53 .03 10,909.50 GNMA POOL 005475/2 .000 6.13E AAA 105.691 11,449.87 .00 36212YGV9 6.500% 04/15/2031 DD 04/01/01 AAA 11,552.14 .00 127,835.97 GUM POOL 10543315 .DOD 6.138 AAA 205.091 133,968.10 .03 36212YN82 6.5001 02/15/2031 DO 02/01/01 AAR 155,366.30 .03 66,498.41 GUM POOL 10552322 .DOD 6.138 AAA 105.891 69,792.16 .01 36213ESE3 6.50D8 01/15/2032 DO 01/01/02 AAA 70,415.58 .02 478,961.86 GNBA POOL 10552466 .000 6.160 ARA 105.524 S02,685.45 .13 36213EW36 6.500E D3/15/2032 DD 03/01/02 AAA 505,429.02 .13 390,297.17 GUM POOL 60552659 .000 6.138 AAA 105.892 4O9,629.06 .11 36213ESUS 6.500% 07/15/2032 DD 07/01/02 AAA 413,290.09 .11 359,522.30 GUM POOL #0561017 .000 6.13B AAA 105.991 332,335.13 .10 36213OG29 6.500% 07/15/2031 DO 07/01/01 AAA 380,705.69 .10 253,532.74 GNBA 11 POOL #0080395 .000 3.437 AAA 101.044 251,235.10 .07 36225CNN4 VAR RT 04/20/2030 DD 04/01/00 AAA 258,209.02 .02 2,252,721.51 GUM II POOL 1080408E .000 3.432 AAA 101.843 2,229,842.31 .62 36225CN28 6.5001 05/20/2030 DO 05/01/00 AAA 2,294,247.05 .58 3,000,000.00 GENERAL MIRE ACCEP COUP SR NT .000 5.684 A3 I03.365 3,064,350.00 .88 330425S03 6.125% 08/29/2007 DO 08/29/02 "Be 3,232,950.00 .82 3,000,000.00 GOLOMAN SACMS GROUP INC SR NT .000 3.953 AA3 104.359 3,030,030.00 .95 381410CS1 4.125% 01/15/2DOB DO 01/13/03 A4 3,130,720.00 .90 3,200,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY NT .000 3.543 AAI 102.329 3,195,640.00 .89 613446NN2 3.625% 04/01/2DOB DO 03/06/03 Ai 3,214,496.00 .83 1,000,000.00 PNILIP NORRIS COS INC NTS .000 3.500 BOAT 100.000 1,052,600.00 .27 719154COB 7.5001 04/01/2004 DO 04/01/97 BBB 1,000,000.00 .25 963,373.96 RESIDENTIAL ASSET 03-RS12 AIIB .000 1.419 ARA 100.063 963,373.96 .26 7609B5R83 VAR AT 12/25/2033 DD 12/30/03 ARA 963,976.07 .25 3,260,896.08 SBA GTD BEV PARTS 2001-20C I .000 5.350 AAA I10.255 3,260,006.08 .98 83162CWO 6.340% 03/01/2021 AAA 3,595,2B9.95 .92 YLDANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 13 MSF07522202 2004/03/31 RON DATE , 04/06/04 DISTRICTi TANG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIM , 11.04.29 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT MOODY RAREST TOTAL COST/ 3 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOON YIELD S-F PRICE RAREST VALUE 9 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 2,241,342.07 SBA GID PARTS CTFS SBIC-PS 01 .000 6.059 AAA 109.595 2,241,342.07 .63 931641DD4 6.6401 02/10/2011 DO 02/21/01 BE 2,456,398.84 .63 1,600,000.00 UNITED AISLE PASSTHRU 01-1 C .000 33.192 SR 20.580 1,600,000.00 .09 909313BC2 6.831% 03/01/2010 DO 09/22/01 A- 329,200.00 .08 20,000,000.DO U S TREASURY NOTES .000 5.539 AAA 112.031 22,620,312.50 6.13 9128272JO 06.250% 02/15/2007 DO 02/15/97 AM 22,406,300.00 5.01 3,438,540.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEI HT .000 3.202 AAA 113.219 3,748,041.35 1.06 9128223T3 3.6251 01/15/2000 DO 01/15/98 AAA 3,893,020.60 .99 14,678,170.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX HT .000 3.135 AAA 116.188 16,303,530.11 4.67 9128224Y5 3.835% 02/15/2009 GO 01/15/19 ARA I2,054,198.22 4.35 57,100,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 5.374 AAA 107.000 62,702,901.47 16.33 9128226R7 05.750% 11/15/2005 DO 11/15/00 AAA 61,097,000.00 15.57 12,000,000.00 U S TREASURY HT .000 3.160 AAA 102.840 11,870,156.25 3.38 912828BG4 3.2501 00/15/2008 DO 00/15/03 AAA 12,340,800.00 3.14 81,00D,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 1.862 AM 100.690 82,284,765.63 22.33 912828BX3 1.8351 01/31/2006 DO 01/31/03 AAA 81,550,900.00 20.35 17,000,000.00 U S TREASURY NOTES .000 1.622 AAA 100.156 17,045,156.25 4.66 912828CB4 1.62S6 02/29/2006 DO 02/29/04 AAA 17,026,562.50 4.34 1,750,000.00 VIRGINIA BLOC 6 PRO 01 SEE A .000 5.369 A3 107.109 1,743,040.00 .51 927804ENO 5.750% 02/31/2006 DD 03/27/01 BBB. 1,074,407.50 .40 16,362,500.00 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.017 3.061 AAA 110.250 14,444,550.33 4.94 9128272N3 3.3751 01/15/2007 DO 01/15/92 AAA 19,039,656.25 4.60 15,500,000.00 FEDERAL NAIL RIG ASSN OEM 5.963 6.338 AAA 105.118 16,154,410.00 4.46 313S9NFR1 7.125% 02/15/2005 DO 02/14/00 AAA 16,293,339.60 4.15 1,015,139.09 FHLNC HULTICLASS 111G NOR E3 A 6.316 3.635 AAA 104.024 1,016,220.57 .28 3133WE95 VAR RT 00/15/2032 DD 12/01/97 AAA 1,055,989.29 .27 663,304.20 GEM GTD REHIC TR 2000-9 FH 6.320 1.501 AAA 100.595 663,3D4.28 .10 3837B4N19 VAR RE 02/16/2030 AAA 667,194.61 .12 5,537.93 GSNA POOL 00500917 6.309 5.218 AAR 104.926 5,294.67 .00 36210SPAO 6.000% 04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 AAA 5,052.69 .00 YLDAMAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE 14 OCSFO7522202 2004/03/31 RUN DATE D4/06/04 DIRTRICTt LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIMC t 11.04.29 PAR VALUE YTM AT CURRENT MOODY PARENT TOTAL COST/ B TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BOOR YIELD S-P PRICE MARKET VALUE 4 TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ____________ __________ 32,712.44 GPM POOL /0506636 6.389 5.318 AAA 104.926 31,051.25 .00 36210YY90 6.000% 04/15/2029 DD 04/01/99 AAA 34,323.70 .01 290,960.31 GPM POOL 10503388 6.389 5.318 AAA 104.926 206,104.90 .02 36210VF55 6.000% D3/15/2029 DO D3/01/99 AAA 305,292.37 .00 12,611.01 GPM POOL #0499153 6.30% 5.018 AAA 104.926 11,970.60 .00 3621000ES 6.000% 02/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 AAA 13,232.20 .00 339,296.84 GNMA POOL #0496461 6.390 5.318 ARA 104.926 358,129.74 .10 362I0MON4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO D1/DI/99 AAA 395,071.16 .10 97,118.29 GPM POOL #0491103 6.390 5.318 AAA 104.926 92,106.52 .02 36210FRY4 6.000% 01/15/2029 DO 01/01/99 AAA 101,902.12 .03 11,382.18 GUM POOL 10486720 6.390 5.310 AAA 104.926 10,004.19 .00 36210AVM6 6.00D4 12/15/2028 DO 12/01/98 AAA 11,942.84 .00 20,924.70 GNM POOL 10497343 6.350 5.318 AM 104.926 19,862.12 .00 36210HP45 6.000% 12/15/2028 DD 12/DI/90 AAA 22,955.40 .01 14,335.24 GNNA POOL 00469688 6.391 5.318 AAA 104.926 13,607.27 .00 36209EXRO 6.000% 11/15/2028 DD 11/01/98 AAA 15,041.36 .00 20,549.67 GNMA POOL 00467279 6.391 5.318 AAA 104.926 19,5D6.13 .00 362D9CCQ3 6.000% 10/15/2028 DO ID/01/98 AAA 21,561.90 .01 35,427.53 GNMA POOL 004570/4 6.391 S.718 AAA 104.926 33,628.46 .01 36208QS83 6.0001 10/15/2028 DO 10/01/98 AAA 37,172.61 .01 396,420.92 OPEN, POOL #0467286 6.391 5.318 AAA 104.926 376,290.17 .11 36209CCK2 6.000% 20/25/2028 DO 10/01/90 ARA 415,947.74 .II 491,653.90 GPM P00L #0465555 6.392 5.718 AAA 104.926 466,687.11 .14 36209AE49 6.000% 09/15/2020 DO 09/01/98 AAA 515,871.69 .13 13,132.28 GPM POOL #0483452 6.392 5.316 AAA 104.926 12,465.42 .00 36209RBV3 6.000% 09/15/2028 DO 09/01/98 AAA 13,339.15 .00 456,504.86 GPM POOL ID465546 6.392 5.718 AMA 104.926 433,322.99 .13 36209AET3 6.000% 08/15/2028 DO 08/01/99 AAA 478,991.31 .12 303,D83.43 GMNA POOL #0468339 6.392 5.118 AAA 104.926 287,696.29 .OB 36209DHOD 6.000% 08/15/2028 DO 09/01/90 AAA 318,016.05 .00 Yw"AL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE [ 15 OCSF07522202 2004/03/31 ROD DATE t 04/06/04 DISTRICT, LONG-TERM OPERATING RUN TIRE 11.04.29 PAR VALUE YIN AT CURRENT RUDDY NARRET TOTAL COST/ 1 TYPE SECURITY SO SECURITY DESCRIPTION DOOR YIELD S-P PRICE RAKERS VALUE 1 TOTAL ----------------- ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------------ ---------- 10,554.09 GRRA POOL 10438057 6.193 5.315 AAA 104.988 17,611.90 .00 36203PTN9 6.0004 05/15/2020 DO 05/01/99 AAA 19,479.62 .00 18,762.45 GERA POOL /0468330 6.393 5.715 AAA 104.98E 17,009.65 .00 36209DNP4 5.000% 05/15/2028 DD 05/01/99 AAA 19,699.37 .01 288,926.10 SENA II POOL 6080088R 6.305 4.303 ARA 101.665 295,246.36 .00 36225CC20 3.335E 06/20/2027 DO 06/01/57 ARA 293,736.00 .03 2,000,D00.00 RARSE 6 RCLERNAN COS INC SR NT 6.317 6.553 A2 101.031 1,992,260.00 .55 S71748MB 6.6251 06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 AA- 2,020,620.00 .51 2,500,000.00 FORD HIS CA CO GLOBAL L DRARA 6.739 6.604 A3 101.453 2,495,900.00 .69 345397SJ3 6.3001 07/16/2004 DO 07/16/99 EBB- 2,536,325.00 .65 2,500,000.00 COUNTRYWIDE NONE LNS INC HT 6.866 6.777 A3 101.070 2,490,400.00 .69 2223""B 6.9501 06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 A 2,526,950.00 .64 208,764.49 GERA II POOL 00080023 6.992 4.433 AAA 103.302 212,222.15 .05 36225CAE9 VAR RE 12/20/2026 DD 12/01/96 AAA 215,657.27 .05 2,100,000.00 FRDERAL NAIL RTG ANNE DENS 3.113 5.685 AAA 116.541 2,030,133.00 .67 31359MYS 6.4254 09/15/2009 DO 09/01/99 AAA 2,447,364.99 .62 1,000,000.DO FORD ROTOR CR CO NT 7.502 6.444 A3 104.750 965,170.00 .28 345393GV9 6.350% 05/15/2005 DO D5/24/93 BBB- 1,047,500.00 .23 943,578.54 NEE/BONTOON PAIGE 1000-11150 3.684 7.363 AAA 101.003 923,085.20 .26 302998GE3 7.5004 12/01/2030 DD 10/21/99 AAA 960,597.20 .24 3,000,000.00 PACIFICORP SECD HER ISE 00115 3.I09 7.077 A3 103.156 2,950,530.00 .84 69512EE0S 3.300E 10/22/2004 DO 10/22/92 A 3,094,680.00 .39 YLOANAL YIELD ANALYSIS PAGE t 16 O SM7522202 2004/03/31 RUN DAM i 04/06/04 DISTRICTI TANG-TERN OPERATING RUN TIM 111.04.29 PAR VALUE VIM AT CURRENT MOODY !WIRES TOTAL COST/ 4 TYPE SECURITY ID SECURITY DESCRIPTION BODY YIELD S-P PRICE RAREST VALUE A TOTAL _________________ _____________________________ _______ _______ _______ ________ ------------ _-----_--- 1,600,000.00 ALLSTATE CORP SR HT 7.967 7.377 Al 106.750 1,594,032.00 .46 020002ALS 7.075% OS/01/2005 DD 05/01100 A+ 1,708,000.00 .44 ________ _______ ----------------- --------- TOTAL PIPED INCOME SECURITIES .337 4.547 359,437,659.61 100.00 365,001,611.99 93.01 -------- ------- -"'""----------- --------- TOTAL .335 4.521 304,010,569.71 100.00 392,454,522.09 100.00 Asset Detail Report m: 01.8013• Base C�ney: ©/ Mellon by Currency Aitereete Base Currency: II8D Exchange Rate: OCSDCONSOLIDATED-OCSG00010000 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Not Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base U.S.DOLLAR CASH a CASH EQUIVALENTS INTEREST RECEIVABLE 3,366,216.86 3,366,216.86 0.70% 0.00 RECEIVABLE FOR INVESTMENTS 6,256,629.35 6,256,629.35 1.29% 0.00 SOLD PAYABLE FOR INVESTMENTS -9,095,640.62 .9,095,640.62 -1.88% 0.00 PURCHASED FEDERAL HOME LN EKE CONS DISC 99.7434 2,500,D00.000 2,493,585.76 2,493,585.76 0.51% 0.00 MAT 05/05/2004 SEC ID:313384WL9 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC 99.4313 2,000,000.000 1,988,625.00 1,988,625.00 0.41% 0.00 MAT OS/19/2004 SEC ID:313384XA2 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N 99.7472 1,700,000.000 1,695,702.78 1,695,702.78 0.35% 0.00 MAT 05/26/2004 SEC ID:313384XH7 FEDERAL HOME LN SK CONS DISC N 99.7583 3,000000.000 2,992,750.00 2,992,750.00 0.62% 0.00 MAT 05/28/2004 SEC ID:313384XKO FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N 99,7745 4,000,000.000 3,990,980.00 3,990,980.00 0.82% 0.00 MAT 06/02/2004 SEC ID:313384XQ7 FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DISC 99.7450 21500.000.000 2,493,625.00 2,493,625.00 0,51% 0.00 MAT 5/4/2004 SEC ID:313396WKS FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 99.7722 6,000,000.000 5,986,333.33 S,986,333.33 1.24% 0.00 MAT 05/18/2004 SEC ID:313396WZ2 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC 99.7472 2,000,000.000 1,994,944.44 1,994,944.44 0.41% 0.00 MAT 05/25/2004 SEC ID: 313396XG3 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 99,7528 6,500,000.000 6,483,930.56 6,483,930.56 1.34% 0.00 MAT 05/12/2004 SEC ID: 313588WTS FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 99.7500 9,600,000.000 9,569,801.67 9,569,801.67 1.98% 0.00 MAT 05/19/2004 SEC ID:313588XA8 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 99.8295 500.000.000 499,147.50 499,147.50 0.10% 0.00 MAT 05/20/2004 SEC ID:313588XB6 4/8/2004 8:38:11AM PDT 1 Workbench Asset Detail Report M: G1,8013 Base Curreney: USD / Mellon by Currency Alternate Base Currency: OCSDC IMOMMTED-OCSGOOO loom 3 31 2004 Eaenense Rate: Statva: FINAL Net Unrealized Price coat Market Value % of Gain/Lose Description Base Skarse Par Base Base Total Base FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 997658 5.600,000.000 5,586,124.56 5,586,124.56 1,15% 0.00 MAT 06/02/2004 SEC ID:313588XQ3 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT 99.6721 8.800,000.000 8,771,142.87 8,771,142.87 1.81% 0.00 MAT 07/01/2004 SEC ID: 31358SW 1 GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 99.6678 500,DOO.000 498,338.89 498,338.89 0.10% 0.00 07/08/2004 SEC ID: 36959HG84 U S TREASURY BILL 99.4843 81000.000.000 7,958,746.66 7,958,746.66 1.64% 0.00 0.000%04/29/2004 DD 10/30/03 SEC ID:912795PW5 U S TREASURY BILL 99.4820 4.400,000.000 4.377.207.88 4,377,207BS 0.90% 0.00 0.000%05/06/2004 DO 11/06/03 SEC ID:912795PX3 U S TREASURY BILL 99.5197 23,100,000.000 22,989.043.00 22,989,043.00 4.759% 0.00 DUE 08/05/2004 DD 02/05/2004 SEC ID:912795QW4 CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 100.0000 18,200,000.000 18,200,000.00 18,200,000.00 3.76% 0.00 00.9209%04/01/2004 DO 03/31/04 SEC ID:99418J221 DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 100.0000 2,121,813.760 2.121,813.76 2,121,813.76 0,44% 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 TOTAL CASH k CASH EQUIVALENTS 111,021,813.765 111,219,049.25 111,219,049.25 22.96% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES AIG SUNAMERICA GLOBAL REG S 109.8670 752,000.000 826,199.84 826.199.84 0.17% 0.00 5.850%08/01/2008 DO O8/08/O1 SEC ID:U00907AA0 COMMIT TO FOR FNMA SF MTG 102.4375 21800.000.000 2,875.250.00 2,868,250.00 0.59% -7,000.00 5.500%04/01/2034 DD 04/O1/04 SEC ID:0IF052649 ALLSTATE CORD SR NT 106.7500 1,600.000.000 1,594,032.00 1.708.000.00 0.35% 113,968.00 7.875%05/01/2005 DO 05/01/00 SEC ID:020002ALS ASSOCIATES CORP NA MTN SROOD43 101.8430 100,000.000 104,199.00 101,843.00 0.02% -2,356.00 7.920%07/13/2004 DO 07/13/94 SEC ID: 045906BU7 ASSOCIATES CORP NORTH AMER 100.2030 1,000,000.000 1,041,290.00 1,002,030.00 0.21% -39,260.00 5,800%04/20/2004 DO 04/20/99 SEC 1D:046003XA6 4/8/2004 8:38:IIAM PDT 2 Workbench Asset Detail Report ID: 01.8O13- Base Currency: UBD / Mellon by Currency Alternate Base Currency: Exchange ocaDcoNSOLIDArBD-OCBnU0O1000O 3/3112004 S Pete: Stator: FINAL Net Unrealized' price Cost Market Value %Of Gain/Logs Description Base Shares Par Base Base _. Total Bade BANK OF AMERICA CORP SR OBL NT 101.0780 500,000.000 518,385.00 505,390.00 0.10% -12,995.00 6.625%06/15/2004 DO 06/15/99 SEC ID: 066050CW3 CIT GROUP INC NEW SR NT 108.7030 1,500,000.000 1,527,135.00 1,630,545.00 0.34% 103,410.00 5.500°/s I1/30/2007 DD 12/02/02 SEC ID: 125581AD0 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LNS INC NT 101.0780 2,500,000.000 2,498,400.00 2,526,950.00 0.52% 28,550.00 6.850%06/15/2004 DO 06/24/99 SEC ID:22237UAB8 WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE e000-11150 101.8026 943,578.540 923,085.20 960,587.20 0.20% 37,502.00 7.500% 12/O1/2030 DD 10/21/99 SEC ID:302998OE3 FHLMC GROUP aG4-0353 100.9122 50,917.910 52,206.77 51,382.37 0.01% -824.40 7.500% 10/01/2004 DO 03/01/99 SEC ID:3128DBMA2 FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS BDS 105.0816 7,500,000.000 7,997,625.00 7,881,122.25 1.63% -116,502.75 7.125%02/15/2005 DO 02/08/00 SEC ID:3133MAUN7 FHLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 A 104,0240 1,015,139.090 1,016,220.57 1,055,988.29 0.22% 39,767.72 VAR RT 08/15/2032 DO 12/01/97 SEC ID:3133TCE95 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DEB 100.1068 1,100,000.000 1,125,905.00 1,101,174.25 0.23% -24,730.75 3.750%04/15/2004 DD 04/15/02 SEC ID:3134A4PH1 FHLMC GROUP 478-6064 103.8423 76,150.570 74,294.39 79,076.53 0.02% 4,782.14 6.384%01/01/2028 DO 12/01/97 SEC ID:31348SWZ3 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 116.5412 21100,0O0.000 2,030,133.00 2,447,364.99 0.51% 417,231.99 6.6251/609/15/2009 DO 09/O1/99 SEC ID: 31359MLYS FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 105.1183 15,500,000.000 16,154,410.00 16,293,339.60 3.36% 138,929.60 7.125%02/15/2005 DO 02/14/00 SEC ID: 31359MFHl FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEBS 107.2675 11,350,000.000 11.521.271.50 12,174,855.58 2.51% 653,584.08 5.250%06/15/2006 DO 06/22/O1 SEC ID: 31359MJX2 FNMA POOL s0254510 103.1602 803,849.480 827,964.96 829,252.41 0.17% 1,287.45 5.000% 11/O1/2017 DD 10/O1/02 SEC ID:31371KVB4 FNMA POOL 40254631 103.1602 171,411.270 176,553.61 176,828.14 0.04% 274.53 5.000%02/01/2018 DO 01/01/03 SEC ID:31371KY47 4/8/2004 8:38:11AM PDT 3 Workbench Asset Detail Report m: OLS013 Base Carreney: USD / Mellon by Currency Alternate Base C=ency: ocaDC ImoubtTED-OCe000o10000 3/31/2004 a Ka�States: MAL Not Unrealized Price Cost Market Value % of Gain/Lose Description Bays Shares Par Base. Base Total Baea FNMA POOL#0254760 103.2227 154,118.900 158,742.46 159.085.63 0.03% 343.17 5.000%06/01/2018 DO 05/01/03 SEC ID: 31371K5V9 FNMA POOL#0254866 103.2227 67,922.730 69.857.42 70,008.43 0.01% 151.01 5.000%09/01/2018 DO 08/01/03 SEC ID: 3137ILC33 FNMA POOL#0254953 103.2227 357,031.180 361,605.65 368,537.08 0.08% 6,931.43 5.000% 11/01/2018 DO 10/01/03 SEC ID: 31371LE21 FNMA POOL#0254987 102.9322 967,177.730 979.569.69 995,537.03 0.21% 15,967.34 5.000% 12/01/2018 DO 11/01/03 SEC ID: 3137ILF46 FNMA POOL#0323980 105.7266 192.417,270 200.895.65 203,436.16 0.04% 2,540.51 6.000%04/01/2014 DO 09/01/99 SEC ID: 31374T2MO FNMA POOL#0357328 102.9528 30,286.760 31,195.36 31.181.06 0.01% -14.30 5.000%01/01/2018 DD 01/01/03 SEC ID:31376AM8 FNMA POOL N0357430 103.0039 1,544,014.910 1,561,385.09 1,590,395.73 0.33% 29.010.64 5.000%09/01/2018 DO 09/01/03 SEC ID:31376KA71 FNMA POOL#0456482 105.7266 60.341.640 63,000.44 63,797.14 0.01% 796.70 6,000%02/01/2014 DO 02/01/99 SEC ID:31381CCT2 FNMA POOL s0509649 105.7266 148,561.080 155,107.06 157.068.52 0.03% 1,961.46 6,000%09/01/2014 DO 09/01/99 SEC ID:31383QEWO FNMA POOL#0535451 105,6016 152,452.950 159.170.41 160,992.69 0,03% 1,822.28 6.0009,6 06/01/2015 DO 07/01/00 SEC ID: 31384VZQ8 FNMA POOL#0535672 105.7266 3,278,934.530 3,423,412.60 3,466,704.68 0.72% 43,292.08 6.000%01/01/2016 DO 12/01/00 SEC ID:31384WCHI FNMA POOLs0545296 105.6641 1,060,143.490 1,106,856.06 1,120,190.65 0.23% 13.334.59 6.000% 11/01/2016 DO 10/01/01 SEC ID:31385HXZO FNMA POOL#0545580 106.0391 88,344.730 92,237.41 93,679.92 0.02% 1,442.51 6.000%03/01/2017 DO 03/01/02 SEC ID: 31385JCR7 FNMA POOLs0555101 105.9141 161.536,340 168,654.02 171.089.70 0,04% 2,435.68 6.000% 10/01/2017 DO 11/01/02 SEC ID:31385WU23 4/8/2004 8:38:1/AM PDT 4 Workbench Asset Detail Report M. OM013 Bee.Currency: MID / Mellon by Currency Alternate Base Currency: ocsucoxsouwr7eD-OcsGwO10000 3/31/2004 gseanget,%.; p�AL Fet Unrealised' price Cosh Market Value. % of Onia/foea- Description Baas Shares Par Base Base Total - Baee FNMA POOL e05SS363 103.0039 368,911.790 379.979.14 379,993.57 0.08% 14.43 5.000%04/01/2018 DO 03/01/03 SEC ID:31385WSY1 FNMA POOL#0555453 103.1602 37,884.120 38,369.51 39,081.32 0.01% 711.81 5.000%05101/2018 DO 04/01/03 SEC ID:31385XBW6 FNMA POOL#0555545 103.0039 307,445,740 316,669.12 316,681.13 0.07% 12.01 5.000%06/O1/2018 DO 05/O1/03 SEC ID:31385XES2 FNMA POOL#0555621 102.9322 1,065,954.330 1,077,946.31 1,097,209.93 0.23% 19.263.62 5.000%07101/2018 OD 06/O1/03 SEC ID: 31385XG68 FNMA POOL#0576386 105.3013 63.908.170 66,724.12 67.296.15 0.01% 572.03 6.000%05/01/2016 DD O5/O1/01 SEC ID: 31386XJ72 FNMA POOL#0576739 105.9141 151,190.020 157.851.83 160,131.49 0.03% 2,279.66 6.000%04/01/2016 DD 04/01/01 SEC ID:31386"86 FNMA POOLN0580888 106.0391 213,871.900 223.295.62 226,787.75 0.05% 3,492.13 6.000%05/01/2016 DD OS/01/01 SEC ID:31387DJ9I FNMA POOL#0594002 105.6641 163,178.630 170,368.68 172,421.17 0.04% 2,052.49 6.000%07/O1/2016 DD 07/01/01 SEC ID:31387T3K8 FNMA POOLe0597376 105.6641 232,066.770 242,292.21 245,211.17 0.05% 2.918.96 6.000%09/Ol/2016 DD 08/Ol/01 SEC ID: 31387XT96 FNMA POOL#0605259 105.6641 137.840.230 143,913.82 145,647.58 0.03% 1,733.76 6.000%09/01/2016 DO 09/O1/Ol SEC ID:31388HMG1 FNMA POOLp0608366 105.6641 86.130.190 89,925.30 91,008.66 0.02% 1,093.36 6.000% 10/01/2016 DO 09/O1/01 SEC ID:31388U78 FNMA POOLN0616734 106.1641 168,429.970 175,851.41 178,812.09 0.04% 2,960.68 6.000% 12/01/2016 DO 12/01/01 SEC ID: 31388WEF9 FNMA POOLe0630812 105.3226 159.806.240 166,847.70 168,312.08 0.03% 1,464.38 6.000%02/01/2017 DO 02/01/02 SEC ID: 31389NYH2 FNMA POOL 40632376 105.9141 771,604.770 805.603.62 817,237.94 0.17% 11,634.32 6.000%07/0112017 DO 07/O1/02 SEC ID:31389QQ50 41812004 8:38:11AM PDT 5 Workbench Asset Detail Report ID: 0L8013 ©/ Mellon Bane`�"" DaD by Currency Alt<rn#te Ba. Exchange nge Rate: a : OCSDCONBOfdDATED-0CBG00010000 3/31/2004 slan,e: FD#,v. Net Unrealized Price cost Market Value % of pain/Legs. Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Bags FNMA POOL#0653116 105.9141 439,281.710 458,637.56 465,261.09 0.10% 6,623.53 6.000%07/01/2017 DO 07/O1102 SEC ID:31390QSDS FNMA POOL 40673280 105.9141 186,481.450 194,698.29 197,510.07 0,04% 2,811.78 6.000%08/01/2017 DO 11/01/02 SEC ID: 3139IP6R2 FNMA POOL 40681309 103.0039 557,907.170 574.644.38 574,666.20 0.12% 2L82 5.0009%02/O1/2018 DD 02/O1/03 SEC ID:31391Y3S4 FNMA POOL#0681334 103.0039 69,784,180 71,877.70 71,880.43 0.01% 2.73 5.000%02/01/2018 DD Ol/0l/03 SEC ID:31391Y4T1 FNMA POOL#0684908 103A602 346,982.230 351,427.94 357,947.42 0.071Y. 6,519.48 5.000%06/0112018 DD 05/01/03 SEC ID: 31400D3R1 FNMA POOL#0685200 103.0039 196,909.150 199,432.06 202,824.12 0.04% 3,392.06 5.000%03/01/2018 DD 03/Ol/03 SEC ID: 31400EGH7 FNMA POOL#0685665 103.0039 35,411.020 36,473.35 36,474.74 0.01% 1.39 5.000%02/01/2018 DD 02/O1/03 SEC ID:31400EW22 FNMA POOL#0686318 103.0039 299,409.160 308,391.43 308.403.14 0.06% 1L71 5.000%03/01/2018 DD 03/O1/03 SEC ID:3I400FPB7 FNMA POOL#0688739 103.0039 116,331.810 119,821.76 119,826.31 0.02% 4.55 5.000%06/O1/2018 DO 06/O1103 SEC ID:31400JEL9 FNMA POOL#0689859 103.2227 119.332.890 120,861.84 123,178.58 0.03% 2,316.74 5.000%05101/2018 DO O5/O1/03 SEC ID:3140OKMG8 FNMA POOL#0693834 103.0039 715,269.330 736,727.41 736,755.38 0.15% 27.97 5.000%03/01/2018 DD 03/Ol/03 SEC ID: 3140OPY74 FNMA POOL 00695852 103.0039 261,890.420 269,747.13 269,757.37 0.06% 10.24 5.000%05/O1/20 IS DD 05/01/03 SEC ID:31400SBV0 FNMA POOL#0695889 103.0039 815,674.080 940,144.30 840,176.20 0.17% 31.90 5.000%OS/01/2018 DD OS/Ol/03 SEC ID:3I400SC23 FNMA POOL#0697026 103.0039 25,670.710 26,440.85 26,441.84 0.01% 0.99 5.000%05/O1/2018 DD 04/01/03 SEC ID:31400TLF2 41812004 8.38:11" PDT 6 Workbench Asset Detail Rpoft nc n OL8013 Base Cvmuey: UeD / Mellon by Currency Altemate Base Currency: oc9aC ImounArEa-ocs000010000 3/31/2004 Exes.arStattlus: PB1AL Bet Unrealised Price cost Market Value % of 0Nu/y ,, Description Be" shares Per Base Base , Total Baee FNMA POOL#0698939 106.0391 90,452,550 94,438.12 95,915.03 0.02% 1,476.91 6.000%09/01/2017 DO 03/01/03 SEC ID:31400VFY2 FNMA POOL40702210 102.9322 260,477.710 268,292.D4 268,115.36 0,06% -176.68 5.000%05/01/2018 DO 05/01/03 SEC ID:31401ADP9 FNMA POOL#0702328 103.0039 145,689.050 147,555.70 150,065.42 0,03% 2,509.72 5.000%05/01/2018 DO 04/01/03 SEC ID:31401AHD2 FNMA POOL 90703195 105.8516 77,242.940 80,646.46 81,762.86 0.02% 1,116.40 6.000%01/01/2017 OD 04/01/03 SEC ID:31401BGC3 FNMA POOL#0709148 103.0039 295,651.930 304,521.49 304,533.05 0.06% 11.56 5.000%06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 SEC ID:31401HZM7 FNMA POOL H0709360 103,2227 688,069.300 696,885.20 710,243.43 0,15% 13,358.23 5.000%07101/2018 DD 06/01/03 SEC ID:3140IJB56 FNMA POOL#0709826 103.0039 135.927.880 137,669.45 140,011.03 0.03% 2,341.58 5.000%06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 SEC ID:31401JSP4 FNMA POOL#0709917 103.0039 258.385.050 261,695.60 266,146.70 0.05% 4,451.10 5.000%06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 SEC ID: 31401JVJ4 FNMA POOL40709963 102.9322 26,357.170 26,694.88 27,130.01 0.01% 435.13 5.000%06/01/2018 DO 06/01/03 SEC ID:31401JWYO FNMA POOL#0710235 103.0039 765,590,590 788.558.32 788,588.24 0.16% 29.92 5.000%06/01/2018 DO 06/01/03 SEC ID: 31401KBC8 FNMA POOL#0713344 103.0039 23,899.090 24,616.05 24,617.00 0.01% 0.95 5.000%06/01/2018 DD 06/01/03 SEC ID: 3140INP52 FNMA POOL#0713365 103.0039 323,167.810 327,308.40 332,875.48 0.07% 5,567.08 5.000%07/01/2018 DD 07/01/03 SEC ID:31401NQSI FNMA POOLe0720319 103,0039 891,832.600 903,259.20 918.622.45 0.19% 15,363.25 5.000%07/01/2018 DO 07/01/03 SEC ID: 31401WO45 FNMA POOL#0720369 102.9322 2,380,561.510 2,451,978.36 2.450,363.64 0.51% -1.614.72 5.000%06/01/2018 DO 06/01/03 SEC ID:31401WJNO 4/8/2004 8.38:11" PDT 7 Workbench Asset Detail Repent m: GL8013 Beau Currency: BRD / Mellon by Currency Alternate Been Currency: Ocs8OOASOLIDATED-OCS000010000 3 31 2004 Bsewas se. Staatutue: FINAL Bet Uare iced' Price cost Market value % of Gain/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Base FNMA POOL 00721629 103.4102 306,D69.730 315,251.83 316,507.20 0.07% 1,255.37 5.000%07/01/2018 DO 06/01/03 SEC ID:31401XVW4 FNMA POOL#0723487 103.0039 250,321.150 253,137.27 257,840.57 0.05% 4,703.30 5.000%06/01/2018 DO 06/01/03 SEC ID: 31402AXQ4 FNMA POOL#0729601 103.2227 417,487.210 422,836.27 430,941.40 0.09% 8,105.13 5.000%07/01/2018 DO 07/01/03 SEC ID:31402HRW3 FNMA POOL#0732873 103.3477 36,173.180 36,636.64 37,384.14 0,01% 747.50 5.000% 11/01/2018 DO 10/01/03 SEC ID: 31402MMS FNMA POOL#0737130 103.2227 730,063.690 73%417.63 753,591.16 0.16% 14,173.53 5.000% 10/01/2018 DO 10/01/03 SEC ID:31402S4P9 FNMA POOLe0738211 102.9322 576,9144.790 584,336.91 593,861.80 0.12% 9,524.89 5.00D% 10/01/2018 DO 10/01/03 SEC 1D:31402UDQ2 FNMA POOL#0738487 103.0039 215.799.150 218,564.07 222.281.56 0.050/0 3,717.49 5.000% 10101/2018 DO 10/01/03 SEC ID:31402UNC2 FNMA POOL#0740471 102.9322 691,271.150 700,128.05 711,540.40 0.15% 11,412.35 5.000% 10/01/2018 DO 10/01/03 SEC ID: 31402WT40 FNMA POOL#0740748 103.0039 820.597.820 831,111.72 845,247.84 0.17% 14.136.12 5.000% 10/01/2018 DO 11/01/03 SEC ID:31402WSH7 FNMA POOL#0743868 102.9322 43,335.920 43,891.16 44.606.60 0.01% 715.44 5,000% 11/01/2018 DO 10/01/03 SEC ID:31403BMR1 FNMA POOL#0744008 103.0039 1,137,791.080 1,152,369.02 1,171,969.30 0.24% 19,600.28 5.000%07/01/2018 DO 09/01/03 SEC ID: 31403BR54 FNMA POOLr0744316 102.9322 168,300.650 170,457.01 173,235.51 0.04% 2,778.50 5.000%09/01/2018 DD 09/01/03 SEC ID:3140383Z4 FNMA POOL#0747914 103.0039 358,341.360 362,932.62 369,105.61 0.08% 6,172.99 5,000% 11/01/2018 DO 11/01/03 SEC ID:31403F3XO FNMA POOL40748400 102.9322 241.353.530 244,445.88 248,430.43 0.05% 3,984.5S 5.000%O8/01/2018 DD 09/01/03 SEC ID:31403ONR9 41812004 8:38:I1AM PDT 8 Workbench Asset Detail Beyert m: OL8013• ©/ Mellon Base Currency: V8D by Currency Alternate Brae Currency: OC COAMOU ATSD-OCa000010000 3 31 2004 BXchanee Bate: S Btataa: FINAL Net unrealized Price Cost. Market Value % of (iiin�Loeb Description Base Shares Par Base Base Total Baea FNMA POOL 00748899 102.9021 1,016,121.710 1,029,140.76 1,045,610.58 0.22% 16,469.82 5.000% 12/01/2018 DO 11/01/03 SEC ID:31403G7L0 FNMA POOL#0750377 102.9021 2,511,009.620 2,543,181.93 2,583,881.63 0.53% 40,699.70 5.000% 11/01/2018 DO 11/01/03 SEC ID: 31403JUA2 FNMA POOL#0750380 102.9021 2,067,507.550 2,093,997.51 2,127,508.69 0.44% 33,511.18 5.00VIo 11/01/2018DD 11/01/03 SEC ID:31403JUD6 FNMA POOL r075G445 102,9021 191,850.620 194,308.70 197,418.32 0.04% 3,109.62 5.000% 11/01/2018 DO 11/01/03 SEC ID:31403JWE2 FNMA POOLa0751960 102,9322 886,983.010 898,347.48 912,990.87 0,19% 14,643.39 5.000% 12/01/2018 DD 11/0l/03 SEC ID:31403LMHI FNMA POOLa0753425 103.0039 956,360.340 967,418.25 985,088.54 0,20% 17,670.29 5.000% 11/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 SEC ID:31403NA23 FNMA POOL40755165 103.2227 626,778.880 634,809.48 646.977.83 0.13% 12.168.35 5.000% 12/01/2018 DD 11/01/03 SEC ID:31403Q6A3 FNMA POOL#0756372 103.2227 983,689.850 995,063.76 1,015,390.83 0.21% 20,327.07 5.000% 11/01/2018 DO 11/01/03 SEC ID: 31403SJRB FORD MOTOR CR CO NT 104.7500 1,000,000.000 965,170.00 1,047,500.00 0.22% 82,330.00 6.750%05/15/2005 DO 05/24/93 SEC ID: 345397GV9 FORD MTR CR CO GLOBAL 10L4530 2,500,000,000 2,495,900.00 2,536,325.00 0.52% 40,425.00 LANDMARK 6.700%07/16/20G4 DO 07/16/99 SEC ID:345397SJ3 GNMA POOL#0596612 105.8906 297,905.260 312,650.87 315,453.73 0,07% 2,792.86 6.500%09/15/2032 DO 09/01/02 SEC ID: 36200BYH4 GNMA POOL40569358 105.5239 1,055,308.120 1,080,041.90 1,113,601.81 0.23% 33,559.91 6.500%04/15/2032 DO 04/01/02 SEC ID:362000QK3 GNMA POOL#0569695 105.8906 45,625.270 47,885.14 48,312.88 0.01% 427.74 6.500%02/15/2032 DO 02/01/02 SEC ID:3620OQ2S2 GNMA POOL 40570019 105.8906 78,367.740 82,249.40 82,984.09 0.02% 734.69 6.50D%07/15/2032 DO 07/01/02 SEC ID:3620ORG48 4/8/2004 8:38:1 IAM PDT 9 Workbench Asset Detail Report m: OL8013 ©/ Mellon Same Currency: IIBD by Currency atervata Beae C9rreury: OCSD NSOLIDe2VD.0CB00001000D 3/31/2004 Chang FINAL Net 1lnrealizet Price Cost market value % or pain/Lose Description Base Shares Par Bess Saw Total Base, ONMA POOL 40574323 105.8906 435,105.550 456,656.88 460,735.96 0.10% 4,079.08 6.500% 12/15/2031 DD 12/01/01 SEC ID: 36200WAY7 GNMA POOL#0575364 105.8906 44,315.460 46,510.46 46,925.92 0.01% 415.46 6.500% 11/15/2031 DO 11/01/01 SEC ID: 36200XFD6 GNMA POOL 40587117 105.8906 19,200."0 20,151.99 20,331.99 0,00% 180.00 6.5009/6 06/15/2032 DO 06/01/02 SEC ID: 3620IM022 GNMA POOL 40587439 105.8594 55,770.440 58,532.81 59,038.24 0.01% 505.43 6.500% 11/15/2032 DD 12/01/02 SEC ID:3620IMS45 GNMA POOL#0421389 106.2344 13,563.090 14,234.90 14,408.66 0.00% 173.76 6.500%04/15/2026 DD 04/01/96 SEC ID: 36206UC23 GNMA POOL40438057 104.9883 18,554.090 17,611.90 19,479.62 0,00% 1,867.72 6.000%05/15/2028 DO 05/01/98 SEC ID:36207PTN9 GNMA POOL#0449851 105.6769 22,798.130 23,927.35 24,092.37 0.00% 165.02 6.500%01/15/2028 DD 01/01/98 SEC ID:36208FWL0 GNMA POOL#0457814 104.9258 35,427.530 33,628.46 37,172.61 0.01% 3,544.15 6.000% 10/15/2028 DO 10/01/98 SECID:36208QSB3 GNMA POOL#0465546 104.9258 456,504.880 433,322.99 478,991.31 0,10% 45,668.32 6.000%08/15/2028 DO 08/01/98 SEC ID: 36209AET3 GNMA POOL#0465555 104.9258 491.653.900 466,687.11 515,871.69 0,11% 49,184.58 6.000%09/15/2028 DO 09/01/98 SEC ID: 36209AE48 GNMA POOL#0466845 106.1094 57.238.080 60.073.15 60.734.97 0.01% 661.82 6.500%06/15/2028 DD 06/01/98 SEC ID:36209BTA6 GNMA POOL#0467279 104.9258 20,549,670 19,506.13 21,561.90 0.00% 2,055.77 6.000% 10/15/2028DD 10/01/98 SEC ID: 36209CCQ7 GNMA POOL#0467286 104.9258 396,420.920 376,290.17 415,947.74 0.09% 39,657.57 6.000% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 SEC ID:36209CCX2 GNMA POOLe0468052 106.1094 112,792.860 118,379.64 119.683.80 0.02% 1,304,16 6.500%07/15/202A DD 07101/98 SEC ID:36209C5M4 4/8/2004 8:38:11AM PDT 10 Workbench Asset Detail R<Purt m: OLB013- ©/ Mel Base Currency' D8D Ion by Currency Alternate Base ,age ate: OCEBCONEOL(I)ATED-OCSG000100m 3/31/2004 Exchange Bale: 8fa[ve: FINAL Not Unrealized- Price coat Market Value % of Gain/Logs Description Base Shares Par . Base Base Total _. .Base GNMA POOL e0468330 104.9883 18,762.450 17,809.65 19,698.37 0.00% 1,888.72 6.000%05/15/2028 DD 05/01/98 SEC ID:36209DHF4 GNMA POOL 00468339 104.9258 303,087.430 287,696.29 318,016.85 0.07% 30,320.56 6.000%08/1512028 DD 08/01/98 SEC ID:36209DHQO ONMA POOL#0469688 104.9258 14,335.240 13,607.27 15,041.36 0.00% 1,434.09 6.000% 11/15/2028 DD 11/01/98 SEC ID:36209E%R8 GNMA POOL rO476041 106.1094 173,436.160 181,755.68 184,032.03 0.04% 2,276.35 6.500%06/15/2028 DD 06/01/98 SEC ID:36209MZE7 GNMA POOL40478626 106.1094 163,642.520 171.492.25 173,640.06 0.04% 2.147.81 6.500%01/15/2029 DD Ol/01/99 SEC ID:36209QV79 GNMA POOL 40480598 106.1094 122,664.990 128,549.06 130,159.06 0.03% 1,609.98 6.500% 10/15/2028 DD 10/01/98 SEC ID:36209S3F6 GNMA POOL#0483452 104.9258 13,132.280 12,465.42 13,779.15 0.00% 1,313.73 6.000%09/15/2028 DD 09/01/98 SEC ID:36209WBV3 GNMA POOL 00485527 105.8906 413,548.040 434,D31.60 437,909.58 0.09% 3,876.98 6.500%06/15/2031 DO 06/01/01 SEC ID:36209YLGI GNMA POOLr0485610 105.8906 456,736.080 479,358.79 483,640.67 0.10% 4,281.88 6.500%07/IS/2031 DD 07/01/01 SEC ID:36209YN38 GNMA POOL#0485682 105.8906 88,433.900 92,814.14 93.643.21 0.02% 829.07 6.500%08/15/2031 DD 08/01/01 SEC ID:36209YR56 GNMA POOL#0485703 105.8906 72.697.570 76,298.37 76,979.91 0.02% 681.54 6.500%08/15/2031 DD 08/01/01 SEC ID:36209YRY6 ONMA PDOLe0486720 104.9258 11,382.180 10.804.19 11,942.84 0.00% 1,133.65 6.000% 12/15/2028 DO 12/01/98 SEC ID:36210AVM6 GNMA POOL#0491103 104.9258 97,118.290 92,186.52 101,902.12 0.02% 9,715.60 6.000%01/15/2029 DD 01101199 SEC ID:36210FRY4 GNMA POOLr0496461 104,9258 377.286.840 358,127.74 395,871.16 0.08% 37,743.42 6.000%01/15/2029 DD OI/Ol/99 SEC ID:3621OMQN4 41812004 8:38:11AM PDT 11 Workbench Asset Detail Report M: 0LS013 ©/ Mellon Base Currency: UBD by Currency Alternate Baca Currency: OCSBCONSOUMTED-0CSG00010000 3 31/2004 ExehensSta Rate:; F114A1, Net Unrealised Price Cost Market Value % of 0kin/Loee Description Base Shares par Base Base Total Base. GNMA POOL 00497343 104.9258 20,924.700 19,862.12 21,955.40 0.00% 2,093.28 6.000% 12/15/2028 DD 12/01/98 SEC ID: 362IONP45 GNMA POOL#0499153 104.9258 12,611.010 11,970.60 13,232.20 0.00% 1,261.60 6.000%02/15/2029 DO 02/01/99 SEC ID:36210QQE5 GNMA POOL 40500917 104.9258 5,577.930 5,294.67 5.852.69 0.00% 558.02 6,000%04/15/2029 DO 04/01/99 SEC ID:36210SPA0 GNMA P0OL#0503388 104,9258 290,9150,310 276,184.98 305,292.37 0.06% 29,107.39 6.000%03/15/2029 DO 03/01/99 SEC ID: 36210VF55 GNMA POOL#0506636 104.9258 32,712.440 31,GSI.25 34,323.78 0,01% 3,272.53 6,000%04/15/2029 DO G4/01/99 SEC ID: 36210YY90 GNMA P0OL#0512235 106.0156 10.887.030 11,426.27 11.541.95 0.00% 115.68 6.500% 11/15/2029 DD 11/01/99 SEC ID:36211GBC6 GNMA P0OL#0514326 106.0156 141,394,810 148,177.34 149.900.58 0.03% 1,723.24 6.500%07/15/2029 DD 07/01/99 SEC ID: 36211JLP2 GNMA P0OL#0530053 105.5293 46,750.560 49,066.18 49,335.53 0.01% 269.35 6.500%0411512031 DD 04/01/01 SEC ID:36212CZS3 GNMA P0OLr0537885 105.8906 104,672.660 109,857.22 110,838.53 0.02% 981.31 6.500%02/15/2031 DO 02/01/01 SEC ID: 36212MRE1 GNMA POOL 40547512 105.8906 10,909.500 11,449.87 11,552.14 0.00% 102.27 6.500%04/15/2031 DO 04/01/01 SEC ID: 36212YGV9 GNMA POOL e0547715 105.8906 127,835.970 133,968.10 135,366.30 0.03% 1,398.20 6.500%02/15/2031 DD 02/01/O1 SEC ID:36212YN82 GNMA PO0LN0552322 105,8906 66,498.410 69,792.16 70.415.58 0.01% 623.42 6.500%01/15/2032 DD Ol/01/02 SEC ID: 36213ESK3 GNMA POOL#0552466 105,5239 478,961,860 502,685.45 505,419.02 0.10% 2.733.57 6.500%03/15/2032 DO 03/O1/02 SEC ID: 36213EW36 GNMA POOL#0552659 105.8906 390,297.170 409,629.06 413,288.09 0.09% 3,659.03 6.500%07/15/2032 DO 07/O1/02 SEC ID:36213ESU6 4/8/2004 8.38:1 IAM PDT 12 Workbench Asset Detail Report m: 0L8013 Base Currency: OSD / Mellon by Currency Altercate Baas Currency: Esehange Rate: OC3DCONSOUDATED-OC6000010000 3/31/2004 States: FINAL Net Nave iaad Price Cost Market Value % of Gain LOW Deeoriptfou saw Shares Par News Base Total Hag.. GNMA POOL#0561017 105.8906 359,527.300 377,335.13 380,705.69 0.08% 3.370.56 6.500%07/15/2031 DD 07/01/01 SEC ID:36213QG29 GNMA II POOL#0080023 103.3017 208,764.490 212,222.15 215,657.27 0,04% 3,435.12 VAR RT 12/20/2026 DO 12/01/96 SEC ID:36225CAZ9 GNMA II POOL 4080088M 101.6648 288,926.100 295,246.36 293,736.00 0.06% -1,510.36 7.375%06/20/2027 DO 06/01/97 SEC ID:36225CC20 GNMA II POOL 00080395 101.8445 253,532.740 251,235.10 258,209.02 0.05% 6.973.92 VAR RT 04/20/203ODD04/01/00 SEC ID:36225CNM4 GNMA 11 POOL a080408X 101.8434 2,252,721.510 2,229,842.31 2,294,247.05 0.47% 64.404.74 6.500%05/20/2030 DO 05/01/00 SEC ID: 36225CN28 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN MTR 00448 100.4680 180.000.000 183,801.60 180,842.40 0.04% -2,959.20 7.250%05/03/2004 DD 05/01/00 SEC ID:369620UR3 GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN eTR 00545 100.0310 1,000,000.000 1,001,089.00 1,000.310.OD 0.21% -779.00 VAR RT 05/20/2004 DD 05/20/02 SEC ID:36962GYS7 GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP SR NT 107.7650 3,000,000.000 3,064,350.00 3,232,950.00 0.67% 168,600.00 6.125%08/28/2007 DD 08/29/02 SEC ID:370425SD3 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC SR NT 104.3590 3,000,000.000 3,030,030.00 3,130,770.00 0.65% 100,740.00 4.125%01/15/2008 DO 01/13/03 SEC ID: 38141GCSI GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 PH 100.5850 663.304.280 663,304.28 667,184.61 0.14% 3.880.33 VAR RT 02/16/2030 SEC ID:3837H4NX9 LEHMAN BROS HLDGS INC 100.0000 11000,000.000 1,045,590.00 1,000,000.00 0.21% -45.590.00 6.625%04/01/2004 DD 03/26/99 SEC ID: 524908BZ2 MARSH h MCLENNAN COS INC SR NT 101.0310 2,000,000.000 1,992,280.00 2,020,620.00 0.42% 28,340.00 6.625%06/15/2004 DO 06/14/99 SEC ID:571748ASS MORGAN STANLEY NT 102.3280 3,200,000.000 3,195,648.00 3,274,496.00 0.68% 78,848.00 3.625%04/0112008 DD 03/06/03 SEC ID:617446HW2 NCNB TEX NATL BE DALLAS TEX NT 101.2650 250.000.000 260,870.00 253,162.50 0.05% -7,707.50 9.500%06/01/2004 DD 06/01/89 SEC ID:628857DJO 4/8/2004 8:38.11AM PDT 13 Workbench Asset Detail Ra,ert M: GL8013 Base Cunene, OSD / Mellon by Currency Alternate Base Currency: OCSDCONSOUDATED-0C8000010000 3/31/2004 IDreaanas�tuma. FINAL Net Uniealhoad Price Cost Market Value. % of Gala/Loss Description Base Shares Par Base Hue 'total Base NATIONSBANK CORP 102.2960 600,000.000 615,546.00 613.776.00 0.13% -1,770.00 7.750%08/15/2004 SEC ID:638585AJ8 NATIONSSANK CORP SR NTS 101.3750 627.000.000 646,650.18 635,621,25 0.13% -11.028.93 6.125%07/15/2004 DO 07/23/98 SEC ID:638585BJ7 NORWEST FINL INC NTS 100.0000 520,000.000 531,538.80 520,000.00 0.I1% -11,538.80 7.200%04/01/2004 DD 04/07/97 SEC ID: 669383DG3 PACIFICORP SECD MTN STR 00115 103.1560 3,000,000.000 2,950,530.00 3,094,680.00 0.64% 144,150.00 7.300% 10/22/2004 DO 10/22/92 SEC ID:69512EEU5 PHILIP MORRIS COS INC NTS 100,0000 1,000,000.000 1,052,600.00 1,000,000.00 0.21% -52,600.00 7.500%04/01/2004 DO 04/01/97 SEC ID:718154CH8 RESIDENTIAL ASSET 03-RSII AIIB 100.0625 963,373.960 963,373.96 963,976.07 0.20% 602.11 VAR RT 12/25/2033 DO 12/30/03 SEC ID: 760985K83 SBA GTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 1 110.2550 3,260,986.080 3,260,886.08 3,595,289.95 0.74% 334.403.87 6.340%03/01/2021 SEC ID: 83162CUO SBA GTD PARTN CTFS SB1C-PS 01 109.5950 2,241,342.070 2,241,342.07 2,456,398.84 0.51% 215,056.77 6.640%02/10/2011 DO 02/21/01 SEC ID:831641DD4 UNITED AIRLS PASSTHRU 0 1-1C 20.5800 1,600,000.000 1,600,000.00 329,280.00 0.07% -1.270,720.00 6.831%03/01/2010 DD 08/22/01 SEC ID:909317BC2 US BANCORP MTN sTR 00119 100.5460 1,000,000.000 1,046,310.00 1,005,460.00 0,21% -40,850.00 6.000%05/15/2004 DD 05/10/99 SEC ID: 91159HEY2 U S TREASURY NOTES 112.0315 20,000,000.000 22,620,312.50 22,406,300.00 4.63% -214,012.50 06.250%02/15/2007 DO 02/15/97 SEC ID:9128272JO US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 110.2500 16,362,500.000 14,444,558.33 18,039,656.25 3,72% 3.595.097.92 3.375%01/15/2007 DO 01/15/97 SEC ID:9128272M3 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 113.2190 3,438,540.000 3,748,041.35 3,893,080.60 0,80% 145,039.25 3.625%01/15/2008 DD 01/15/98 SEC ID:9128273T7 US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 116.1875 14.678.170.000 16,303,530.11 17,054,198.77 3.52% 750,668,66 3.875%01/15/2009 DD 01/15/99 SEC ID:9I28274Y5 4/8/2004 8:38:11AM PDT 14 Workbench Asset Detail Repot ID; 91,9013. ©/ Mellon by Currency Beee Catteecy: oaD Alter4vte Seve Currency: OceDCONSo1JM / / eRatTED-OCB000Oloo00 3 31 2004 Eve6aegS Rate. tatus; FINIAL Not Unk6blised Prim cost Market Value % of pain/Loss Description Nate Bbaree Par Have Base Total Base U S TREASURY NOTES 107,0000 57,100,000.000 62,782,901.47 61,097,000.00 12.61% -1,685,901.47 05.750% 11/15/2005 DO 11/15/00 SEC ID: 9128276N7 U STREASURY NT 102.8400 12,000,000.000 11,870,156.25 I2,340,800.00 2.55% 470,643.75 3.250%08/15/2008 DD 08/15/03 SEC ID:912828BG4 U S TREASURY NOTES 100.6900 81,000,000.000 81,284,765.63 81,558,900.00 16.84% 274,134.37 1.875%01/31/2006 DD 01/31/03 SEC ID:912828BX7 U S TREASURY NOTES 100,1563 17.000P00,000 17,G45,156.25 17,026,562.50 3.52% -18.593.75 1.625%02/28/2006 DD 02/29/04 SEC ID:912828CB4 VIRGINIA ELEC A.PWR OI SER A 107.1090 1,750,000.000 1,743,840.00 1,874,407.50 0.39% 130,567.50 5.750%03/31/2006 DO 03/27/01 SEC ID:927804ENO WELLS FARGO A,CO NEW NT 101.5000 125,D00.000 128,605.00 126,875.00 0.03% -1,730,00 6.625%07/15/2004 DO 07/28/99 SEC ID:949746AA9 TOTAL FDMD INCOME SECURITN.S 366,486,196.240 367,687,439.19 373,128,096.39 77.04% 5,440,657.20 TOTAL ASSETS U.B.DOLLAR 467,606,009.000 478,906,488.44 484,347,243.64 100.00% 5,440,657.20 TOTAL ASSETS-EASE: 467,608,009.000 478,906,488.44 484,347,145.64 100.00% 5,440,657.20 41812004 8:38:1]AM ADT 15 Workbench Transaction Detail Report m: EWB009 0 Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: UBD OCSDCONSOLIDATED -OCSG000loom 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Statue: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Repotted Date Base Sbares/Par Base Base Base PURCHASES CASH&CABS EQUNALEETS U.B.DOLLAR B FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N MAT 3/2/2004 99.7583 3,000,000.000 2,992,750.00 -2,992,750.00 0.00 06/28/2004 3/2/2004 SEC ID:313384XKO 3/2/2004 BROKER: BANC OF AMERICA SEC LUC,SAN FRANCISCO OCSF07611102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO H FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N MAT 3/12/2004 99.7745 4,000,000.000 3,990,980.00 -3,990,980,00 0,00 06/02/2004 3/12/2004 SEC ID:313384XQ7 3/12/2004 BROKER: CITIOROUP OBL MKTS/SALOMON, NEW YORK OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 3/19/2004 99.8295 500,000.000 499,147.50 -499,147.50 0,00 0/20/2004 3/19/2004 SEC D:313588XB6 3/19/2004 BROKER CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSFD7522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL NAIL MTO ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 3/3/2004 99.7447 3,600,000.000 3,590,809.00 -3.590,809.00 0.00 06/02/2004 3/3/2004 SEC D:313588XQ3 3/3/2004 BROKER MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC, NY OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL NATL 14TO ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 3/9/2004 99.7658 2,000,000.000 1,995,315.56 .1,995,315.56 0.00 06/02/2004 3/9/2004 SEC ID:313588XQ3 3/9/2004 BROKER CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 3/19/2004 99.7082 3,900,000.000 3,888,620.67 -3,888,620.67 0.00 W/01/2004 3/19/2004 SEC to:313589YVI 3/19/2004 BROKER MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-Pa1CO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 1 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EVFB009 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Curreney: USD OCSOCONSOLIDATEDr=i nnr (jo ID 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Statue: FINAL Trade Date Tree Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loas Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/par Base Base Base B FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 3/29/2004 99.7363 1,000,000.000 997,362,78 -997,362.78 0,00 07/01/2004 3/29/2004 SEC ID:313588YV1 3/29/2004 BROKER: LEHMAN DOW SECS INC, NY OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO B GENERAL ELEC CAP DISC 07/08/2004 3/15/2004 99,6678 500,000,000 498,338.89 498.338.89 0.00 SEC ID:36959HO84 3/15/2004 BROKER:CITIBANK CP IPA,NEW YORK 3/1S/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 0 1.000%03/02/2004 DD 3/1/2004 100,0000 12,300,000.000 12,300,000.00 .12,300.000.00 0.00 03/01/04 3/I/2004 SEC ID:99416Y287 3/I/2004 BROKER: LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY OCSPO7511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.990%03/03/2004 3/2/2004 100.0000 3,400,000.000 3,400,000.00 -3,400,000.00 0.00 DO 03/02/04 3/2/2OD4 SEC ID:99416Z300 3/2/2009 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP.N Y OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.970%03/03/2004 3/2/2004 100.0000 9,300,000.000 9.300.000.00 -9.300,000.00 0.00 DO 03/02/04 3/2/2004 SEC ID:99416Z912 3/2/2004 BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FOIST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.980%03/04/20D4 DD 3/3/2004 100.0000 9,300,000.000 9,300.000.00 -9,300,000.00 0.00 03/03/04 3/3/20D4 SEC ID:99417B476 3/3/2004 BROKER: LEHMAN OOVT SECS INC,NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.980%03/05/2004 3/4/2004 100.0000 9,300,000.000 9,300,000.00 -9,300,000.00 0.00 DO 03/04/04 3/4/2004 SEC N:99417CS21 3/4/2009 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 2 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EY1B009 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category eeno carrcacy: usD OCS DCO NS O L I DATE DrIV2 D Do unrIITPlffl 3/l/2004 - 3/31/2004 Statue: FINAL Trade Date Tran Battle Date PriOe Cost Amount Net Gain/Lose Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base 0 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.980%03/08/2004 DO 3/5/2004 100.0000 9,300,000.000 9,300,000.00 -9,300,000.00 0.00 03/05/04 3/5/2004 SEC ID:99417ESM 3/5/2004 BROKER: LEHMAN OOVT SECS INC,NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.990%03/09/2004 3/8/2004 100,0000 13,800,000.000 13,800,000.00 -13,800,000.00 000 DO 03 08 04 / /2004 SEC ID:99417F311 3 8 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON 3/B/2009 CORP.N Y OCSP07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.960%03/10/20D4 3/9/2OD4 100,0000 34.500.000,000 14,500,000,00 -14.500,000.00 0.00 DO 03/09/04 3/9/2004 SEC ID:99417H408 3/9/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OFER-PIMCO B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.960%03/111004 DD 3/10/2004 100,0000 14,500,000.000 14,500000.00 -14.500,000.00 0.00 03/to 043/10/2004 SEC ID:99417KD62 3/10l 004 BROKER:LEHMAN OOVr SECS INC,NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OFER-PMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.990%03/12/2OD43/11/2004 100.0000 14,500,000.000 14,500.000.00 -14.500,000.00 000 DD 03/11/04 3/11/2004 SEC ID:99417LI36 3/11/2004 BROKER CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDITSUISSE FB REPO 01.000%03/15/2004 3/12/2004 100.0000 15,000,000.000 15,000,000,00 -13,000,000.00 000 DD 03/12/04 3/12/2004 SEC ID:99417NOI 7 3/12/009 BROKER CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 0 LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.050%03/16/004 DO 3/15/004 100.0000 15,000,000,000 15,000,000.00 -15,000,o0D.00 0.00 03/15/04 3/15/2004 SEC ID:99417P798 3/15/2004 BROKER LEHMAN OOVf SECS INC,NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 3 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: E91E009 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Rae.C.ae7: DBD OCSDCO NS OLI DATE DM127']U 0U 70U70U 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gal¢/Lose Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Per Base Rase Have B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.000%03/17/2004 DO 3/16/2004 100.0000 15,000,000.000 15,000,000.00 -15,000,000.00 0.00 03/16/04 3/16/2004 SEC ID:99417R323 3/16/2004 BROKER: LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-P1MCO B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 0 1.000%03/IS/20D4 DD 3/17/2004 100,0000 15,900,000.00D 15.900,000.00 -15.900.000.00 0.00 D3/17/04 3/17/2004 SEC ID:99417S800 3/17/2004 BROKER: LEHMAN GOVf SECS INC,NY CCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.010%03/19/20043/18/20G4 100.0000 15,900,000.000 15,900,000.00 -15,900,000.00 0.00 DD 03/18/04 3/18/20G4 SEC ID:99 17WO1 3/18/2009 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP.N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.990%03/22/2004 DO 3/19/2004 100.0000 15,900,000.000 15,900,ODO.00 -15,900,000.00 0.00 03/19/04 3/19/2004 SEC ID:99417VS63 3/19/2004 BROKER LEHMAN OOVTSECS INC,NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.000%03/23/2004 3/22/2004 100.0000 15,900,000.000 15,900.000.00 -15.900.000.00 0.00 DO 03/22/04 3/22/2004 SEC ID:99417X015 3/22/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP.N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.980%03124/20043/23/2004 100,0000 15,900,000.000 15,900,000.00 -15,900,000.00 0.00 DO 03/23/04 3/23/2004 SEC ID:99417Y393 3/23/20G4 BROKER CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.970%03/25/2004 DO 3/24/2004 100.0000 15,900,000.000 15,900,000.00 -15,900.000.00 0.00 03/24/04 3/24/2004 SEC K2:99418A501 3/24/2004 BROKER: LEHMAN GOUT SSCS INC, NY OCSF0751 I IM:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 4 WorkbenW Transaction Detail eepo.t m: B"009 /© Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Cuneecy: USED OCSDCO NSOLIDATEDMITEI 011110110000 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tres Settle Date ice Coat Amount Net Deia/Loss TYPO Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Hate Base Base B CREDIT SUISSEFB REPO 00.990'A03/26/20043/25/2004 100.0000 15,300,000.000 15,300,000.00 -15,300,000.00 0.00 DO 03/25/04 3/25/2004 SEC ID:9941BB707 3/25/2004 BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07SI 1102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.980%03/29/20D4 3/26/2004 100.0000 15,300,000.000 15,300,000.00 -15,300,000.00 0.00 DO 03 26 09 SEC ID:9941SC192 3/26/2004 BROKER:CREDITSUISSE FIRST BOSTON 3/26/20D4 CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.000%03/30/2004 3/29/2004 100.0000 15,300,000.000 15.300,000.00 -15,300,000.00 0.00 DO 03/29/04 3/29/2004 SEC ID:9941SM69 3/29/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.980%03/31/2004 DO 3/30/2004 100.0000 15,300,000.000 15,300,000.00 -15,300,000.00 0.00 03/30/04 3/30/2004 SEC ID:99418O441 3/30/2004 BROKER: LEHMAN COW SECS INC, NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FS REPO 00.920%04/01/20043/31/2004 100.0000 18,200,000.000 18,200,000.00 -18,200,000.00 0.00 DD 03/31/04 3/31/2004 SEC ID:99418J221 3/31/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BO37ON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/1/2004 1.0000 1,104.500 1,104.50 -1,104.50 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/1/2004 OCS1707511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/1/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/1/2004 1.0000 555,800.270 555,800.27 -555,800.27 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 3/1/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/2/2004 1,0000 9,650.730 9,650.73 -9,650.73 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/2/2004 OCW07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/2/2004 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 5 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: Ea'B009 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSDLO NSOLIDATEDMU?1100011 uni_ini. 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Date Treat Battle Date PriOe Coat Amount Net Gain/Loss �7b Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Has: g DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/3/2004 1,0000 250.580 250.58 -250.58 0,00 SEC ID:996085247 3/3/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMC0 3/3/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/4/2004 1.0000 253.170 253.17 -253.17 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/4/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/4/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 3/5/2004 1.0000 253,170 253.17 -253.17 0,00 SEC ID:9960SS247 3/5/2004 OCW07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/5/2004 a DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 3/8/2004 1.0000 759.500 759.50 -759.50 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/8/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/8/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 3/9/2004 1.0000 8,651.570 8,651.57 -8,651.57 0.00 SEC 02:9960B5247 3/9/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/9/2004 . B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 3/10/2004 1.0000 386.670 386.67 -386.67 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/10/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/10/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 3/12/2004 1,0000 9,418.750 9.418.75 -9,418.75 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/12/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/12/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 3/15/2004 10000 1,250.000 1.250.00 -1,250.00 0.00 SEC ID:99WB5247 3/15/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/15/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 3/15/20G4 1.0000 4,706.220 4,706.22 -4,706.22 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONO TERM OPER-PIMCO 3/15/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 3/16/20D4 1.0000 437.500 437.50 -437.50 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/16/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/16/2004 - 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 6 WQrk enm. Transaction Detail Report ID: EWHUU9 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Bane Cartoae7: USD OC8D-0O4SOLIDATED3II20❑0OI]::II ILI lull 3/l/2004 - 3/31/2004 Statue: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date ice Cost Amount Not Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Ik" . Bite B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/16/2004 1.0000 18684.860 I8¢8486 -18,684.86 0.00 SEC ID:99WS5247 3/16/2004 OCMW522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3/16/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/17/2004 1,0000 416,670 41667 -416.67 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/17/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/17/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/18/2004 1.0000 441.670 441.67 .441.67 0.00 SEC ID:996MS247 3/18/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/18/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/19/2004 1,0000 446.080 446.08 -446.08 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/19/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3119/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/22/2004 1.0000 2,354,770 2.354.77 -2,354.77 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/22/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/22/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/22/2004 1,0000 104,755.280 104,755.28 -104,755.28 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/22/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3/22/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/23/2004 1.0000 441.670 441.67 441.67 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/23/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/23/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/24/2004 1.0000 15,279,849,330 15,279,849.33 -15,279,849.33 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/24/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/24/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/25/2004 1.0000 1,026,731.070 1,026,731.07 .1,026,731.07 0.00 SEC ID:996086247 3/25/2004 OCSF07S22202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 3/25/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/26/2004 1.0000 420,750 420.75 -420.75 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/25/2004 OCSF07SI 1102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/26/2004 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 7 Workbench Transaction Detail Report m: EW8009 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USE, OCSDLO 4SOLIDATED-1K2J I1Jr.1-111n-Inn 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date ice Coat Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Simes/Par Base Base Base g DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 3/29/2004 1.0000 1,249.500 1.249.50 -1.249.50 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/29/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/29/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 3/30/2004 1.0000 425.000 425.00 -425.00 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/30/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/30/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 3/30/2004 1.0000 6,687.990 6,687.99 -6,687.99 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/30/2004 OC3F07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3/30/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 3/31/20G4 1,0000 899,316.750 899,316.75 -899,316.75 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/31/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/31/2004 B DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/31/2004 1,0000 50,312.500 50,312.50 .50,312.50 0.00 SEC ID:99(1085247 3/31/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3/31/2004 TOTAL CASH a CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S.DOLLAR 366,485,456.520 366,438,780.92 -366,438,780.92 0.00 TOTAL CASH a CASH EQUIVALENTS BASE: 366,485,456.520 366,438,780.92 ,366,438,780.92 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.B.DOLLAR B COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MID 5.500 3/10/2004 102.6875 2,800,000,000 2,875,250.00 -2,875,250.00 0.00 04/O1/2034 DD 04/O1/04 4/15/2004 SEC ID:O IM52649 3/10/2004 BROKER: BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN FRANCISCO OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MTG 6.000% 3/24/2004 103.8359 2.000.000.000 2,076.718.75 -2,076,718.75 0,00 04/O1/2034 DO 04/O1104 4/15/2004 SEC ID:0IF060642 3/24/2004 BROKER: BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN FRANCISCO OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-Pa1CO 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 8 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 0 Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Cu cncy: DSD OCSDCO NSOLIDATE DJIE23 M OOOLLIOO 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Date Trap Battle Date Price Coat Amount Net Gain/Lose TyPe Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base g FNMA POOL s0763307 6.000%04/01/2034 2/3/2004 103.5000 500,000.000 517,500.00 -517,500.00 0.00 DO 03/01/04 3/15/2004 SEC D:31404BA07 3/1/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP.N Y OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IB FNMA POOL40763307 6.000%04/01/2034 2/3/2004 103.5000 0,000 0.00 -1,166.67 0,00 DD 03/01/04 3/15/2004 SEC ID:31404BA07 3/1/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON cow,NY OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-MMCO B FNMA POOLN0772131 6.00D%11/01/2033 2/3/2004 103.5000 345,534.040 357,627,73 -357.627,73 0.00 DD 02/01/04 3/l5/2004 SEC ID:31404LY46 3/1/2009 BROKER CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSM522202:LONG TERM OFER.PIMCO IB FNMA POOL40772131 6.000%11/01/2033 2/3/2004 103.5000 0.000 0,00 -806.25 0.00 DD 02/01/04 3/15/2004 SEC ID:31404LY46 3/1/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PMCO B FNMA POOLKOM944 6.000%03/01/2034 2/3/2004 103.5000 154,465.000 159,871.27 -159,871.27 0.00 DD 03/01/04 3/15/2004 SEC ID:31404NZH2 3/1/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IB FNMA 1OOL40773944 6.000%03/01/2034 2/3/2004 103.5000 0.000 0.00 -360.42 0.00 DO(13101104 3/IS/2004 SEC ID:31404NZH2 3/1/2004 BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PRACO B NATIONSBANK CORP 7.750%08/15/2004 3/24/2004 102.5910 600,000.000 615,546.00 -615,546.00 0,00 SEC ID:638585A38 3/24/2004 BROKER CITIOROUPOBLMKTS/SALOMON, 3/24/2004 NEW YORK OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8.34:17" PDT 9 Workbench Transaction Detail RePo.t m: SINUOUS ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Carteter: USD OCSDCO NSOLI DATE DT1:2]JC❑L]CDJUI I 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loan Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Per Base Base Base IB NATIONS13ANK CORP 7.750%08/15/2004 3/24/2004 102.5910 0.000 0.00 -5,037.50 0.00 SEC ID:638585AJ8 3/24/2004 BROKER: CITIGROUPGBLMI( S/SALOMON, 3/24/2004 NEW YORK OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO B USTREASURYNOTES 1.625%02/28/2006DD 3/23/2004 100.2656 17,000,000.000 17,045,156.25 -17,045,156.25 0.00 02/29/04 3/24/2004 SEC ID:912828CB4 3/23/2004 BROKER: BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN FRANCISCO OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IS USTREASURYNOTES 1.625%02/28/2006DD 3/23/2004 100.2656 0.000 0.00 -18,016.30 0.00 02/29/04 3/24/2004 SEC ID:912828CB4 3/23/2004 BROKER: RANCOR AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN FRANCISCO OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO TOTAL FLED DtCOME SECURITIES U.B. DOLLAR 23,399,999.040 23,647,670.00 43,673,057.14 0.00 TOTAL FLXED INCOME SECURITIES BASE: 23,399,999.040 23,647,670.00 .23,673,057.14 0.00 TOTAL PURCHASES BABE: 389,885,456.660 390,086,450.92 ,390,111,338.06 0.00 PAY UPS FIXED D1COnE SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR PU FBLMC MULTICLASS MTG SER E3 A VAR RT 3/1/2004 100.0000 6.300 6.30 -&30 0.00 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/97 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3133TCE95 3/1/2004 OCSFW522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PU US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3,375% 1/15/2004 100.0000 76,440.000 76,440.00 -76,440.00 0.00 01/1512007 DO 01/15/97 1/15/2004 SEC ID:9128272M3 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PU US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NI 3.625% 1/15/2004 100.0000 16,050.000 16,050.00 -16,050.00 0.00 01/15120M DO 01/15/98 1/15/2004 _ SEC ID:912827377 3/l/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-Pa1CO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 10 Workbench, Transaction Detail Report uk BAB009' ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: UBD OC9DL0 4SOLIDATED'm2 Plnn"nll-ip, 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tran settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Loan TYPO Description Reported Date Base Shares/par Base Base Base PU US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.875% 1/15/2004 100.0000 68,510,000 68,510.00 -68,510.00 0.00 01/15/20M DO 011IS/W 1/15/2004 SEC ID:9128274Y5 3/t/2009 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR: 161,006.300 161,006.30 -161,006.30 0.00 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES BABE: 161,006.300 161,006.30 ,161,006.30 0.00 TOTAL PAY UPS BABE: 161,006.300 161,006.30 -161,006.30 0.00 SALES CASH Is CASH EQUIVALENTS U.B.DOLLAR S FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC MAT 3/24/2004 99.7528 -10,700,000.000 .10,673,547.22 10,673,547.22 0.00 OS/18/2004 3/24/2004 SEC ID:313396WZ2 3/24/2004 BROKER: MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC, NY OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 13 FEDERAL HOME LN MTG CORP DISC MAT 3/24/2004 99,7528 0.000 0.00 10.595.97 0.00 05/18/2004 3/24/2004 SEC ID:313396W2 3/24/2004 BROKER: MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY OCW07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 3/24/2004 99.7500 .6,200,000.000 -6,184,500.00 6,184,500.00 0.00 05/19/2004 3/24/2004 SEC ID:313588XA8 3/24/2004 BROKER: MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC,NY OCSF075222M LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IS FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DISCOUNT MAT 3/24/2004 99.7500 0.000 0.00 6,241.33 0.00 05/19/2004 3/24/2004 SEC ID:313588XA8 3/24/2004 BROKER: MORGAN STANLEY&CO INC, NY OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.980%03/01/2004 3/1/2004 100.0000 -12.300,000.000 -12.300.000.00 12.300.000.00 0.00 DO 02/27/04 3/1/2004 SEC ID:99416WB28 3/1/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511IO2:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 11 Workbench Transaction Detail aspen m: EW8009 0 Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Curnn9y: Ben OCSDLO NB OLI DATE DOIIP U JO UI]]IIULpIU 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Statue: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amonat Net Bain/Loss TYPO Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base IS CREDIT SUISSEFB REP000.980%03/01/2004 3/1/2004 100,0000 0,000 0.00 1.004.50 0.00 DO 02/27/04 3/1/2004 SEC ID:99416W828 3/1/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COW,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S LEHM AN CAT 2 R EPO 0 1.000%03/02/2004 DO 3/2/20G4 100.0000 -12,300,000.000 -12,300,000.00 12,300,000.00 0.00 03/01/04 3/2/2004 SEC ID:99416Y287 3/2/2004 BROKER: LEHMAN DOW SECS INC, NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 0 LOW%03/02/2004 DD 3/2/2004 100.0000 0Dw 0.00 341.67 0.00 03/01/09 3/2/2004 SEC ID:994HY287 3/2/2004 BROKER: LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC, NY OCSF075I 1102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.990%03/03/20D4 3/3/2004 100,0000 -3,400,000.000 -3,400,000.00 3,4G0,000.00 0.00 DO 03/02/04 3/3/2004 SEC ID:99416MM 3/3/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORD,N Y OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IS CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00,990%03/03/2004 3/3/2004 100.0000 0.000 0.00 93.50 0.00 DO 03/02/04 3/3/2004 SEC ID:99416Z300 3/3/2004 BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OFER-PIMCO B CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.970%03/03/2004 3/3/2004 I00.0000 -9,300,000.000 -9,300,000.00 9,300,000DO 0.00 DID 03/02/04 3/3/2004 SEC ID:99416Z912 3/3/2004 BROKER CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORD,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.970%03/03/20D4 3/3/2004 100.0000 0.000 0.00 250.58 0.00 DO 03/02/04 3/3/2004 SEC ID:994162912 3/3/2004 BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON - CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 12 WarkbeaW @�; Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009' Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: Dan OCSDCO NSOLI DATE D311-2❑DDMU MAUU 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Stntua: FINAL Trade Date Tram Settle Date Price cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base g LEHMAN CAT 2 REP000.980%03/04/2004 DO 3/4/2004 100.0000 -9,300,000.000 -9,300,000.00 9.300.000.00 0,00 03/03/04 3/4/2004 SEC 0:99417B476 3/4/2004 BR0IIER: LEHMAN GOVT SECS INC,NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PRACO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.980%03104/2004 DO 3/4/2004 100.0000 0.000 0.00 253.17 0.00 03/03/04 3/4/2004 SEC ID:99417B476 3/4/2004 BROKER:LEHMAN GOVTSECS MCG NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.980%03/05/20043/5/2004 100.0000 -9,300,000.000 -9,300.000.00 9,300,000.00 0.00 DO 03/04/04 3/5/20G4 SEC ID:99417CS21 3/5/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON COW,NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PMCO IS CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.980%03/05/20D4 3/5/2004 100.0000 0.000 0.00 253.17 0.00 DO 03/04/04 3/5/2004 SEC ID:99417CS21 3/5/2009 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOS7ON CORP.N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.980%03/0812004 DO 3/8/2004 100.0000 -9,300,000.D00 -9,300,000.00 9,300,000.00 0.00 03/05/04 3/8/2004 SEC ID:99417E587 3/8/2004 BROKER LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY OCSF07511IO2:LIQUID OPER-PMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REP000.980%03/08/2004 DO 3/8/2004 100.0000 0.000 0.00 759.50 0.00 03/05/04 3/8/2004 SEC ID:99417ESM 3/8/2004 BROKER.LEHMAN GOVTSECS INC, NY OCSF07SI 1102:LIQUID OPER-PMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.990%03/09/20D43/912004 100.0000 -13,800,000.000 -13,800,000.00 13,800,000.00 0.00 DO 03/08/04 3/9/20G4 SEC ID:99417F311 3/9/2004 BROKER CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSP0751 I102:LIQUID OPER-PMCO 41812004 8:34:17AM pOT 13 Workbench Transaction Detail Re PartlD: EWB009 0 Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSDCONSOLIDATED7Mggnrir101'mnlifi 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Statue: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net(lain/Lose Typa Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base IS CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.990%03/09/2004 3/9/2004 100.0000 0,000 0.00 379.50 0.00 DD 03/08/04 3/9/2004 SEC ID:99417F311 3/9/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.960%03/10/2004 3/10/2OD4 100.0000 -14,500,000.000 -14.500.000.00 14,500,000.00 0.00 DO 03/09/04 3/10/2004 SEC ID:99417H408 3/30/2004 BROKER CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP.N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO is CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.960%03/10/20043/10/2004 100.0000 0.000 0.00 386,67 0.00 DD 03/D9/04 3/10/2004 SEC ID:99417H408 3/]0/2004 BROKER CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF075I 1102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.960%03/11/2004 DO 3/11/2004 100.0000 -14,500,D00.000 -14,500,000.00 14,500,000.00 0,00 03/10/04 3/11/2004 SEC ID:99417KO52 3/11/2004 BROKER LEHMAN OOVT SECS INC,NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO is LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.960%03/11/2004 DD 3/11/2004 100.0000 BODO 0.00 386.67 0.00 03/10/04 3/11/2004 SEC ID:99417KO62 3/11/2004 BROKER LEHMAN OOVT SECS INC, NY OCSF07611102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.990%03/12/2004 3/12/2004 100.0000 -14,500,000.000 -14,500,000.00 14.500.000.00 0.00 DO 03/21/04 3/12/2004 SEC ID:99417LI36 3/12/Z004 BROKER CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.990%03/12/2004 3/12/2004 100.0000 0.000 0.00 398.75 0.00 DD 03/I1/04 3/12/2004 SEC ID:99417LI36 3/l2/2004 BROKER CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:i7AA{ For 14 Wgrkbeach„ Transaction Detail Report ID: EMB009, ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: Dan ocs DCo ISOLIDATEDHB20nnmmnn ini 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date ease Shares/Par Base Base Base S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.000%03/15/20043/15/2004 100.0000 .15,000,000.000 -15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 0.00 DO 03/12/04 3/15/2004 SEC ID:99417N017 3/15/2004 BROKER CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORD,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.000%03115/20043115/2004 100.0000 0.000 0.00 I,250.00 0.00 DD 03/12/04 3/IS/2D04 SEC ID:994171,1017 3/IS/Z009 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OFER-PIMCO S LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 0 1.050%03/16/2004 DD 3/16/2004 100.0000 -15,000,000.000 .15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 0.00 03/15/04 3/16/2004 SEC ID:99417P798 3/I6/2004 BROKER LEHMAN OOVTSSCS INC,NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO Is LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 01.050%03/16/2004 DO 3/16/2004 100.D000 0.000 0.00 437.50 0.00 03/15/04 3/16/2004 SEC ID:99417P798 3/16/2004 BROKER LEHMAN OOVT SECS INC,NY OCSF07SI 1102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S LEHMAN CAT2 REPO 01.DD0%03/1712004 DD 3/17/2004 100.0000 -15,000.000.000 .15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 0.00 03/16/04 3/17/2004 SEC ID:99417R323 3/17/2004 BROKER LEHMAN OOVT SECS DIC,NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO O I.000%03/17/2004 DO 3/17/2004 100.0000 0,000 0.00 416.67 0.00 03116/04 3/17/2004 SEC ID:99417R323 3/17/2004 BROKER:LEHMAN DOW SECS INC, NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 0 1.000%03/18/2004 DD 3/I8/2004 100.0000 -15,900.000,000 -15,900,000.00 15,900,000.00 0.00 03 17 04 18/ /2D04 SEC ID:994178800 3 BROKER LEHMAN OOVTSECS INC, NY 3/IB/2O04 OCSF075111O2:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8:34:17AM pOT 15 Workbench Transaction Detail aspen m: EIVB009 @/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USE, OCSD-0ONSOLIDATED31130000030031I 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Scotus: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Lose TYPO Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base IS LEHMAN CAT2 REPO 01.000%D3/I8/2004 DO 3/18/2004 100.0000 0,000 0.00 441.67 0.00 03 17 04 IB/ /2004 SEC ID:99417SB00 3 BROKER: LEHMAN DOW SECS INC. NY 3/18/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO g CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.010%03/19/2004 3/19/2004 100.0000 -15,900,000.000 -15,900,000.00 15,900,000.00 0.00 DD 03/18/04 3/19/2004 SEC ID:99417LOOl 3/I9/2004 BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP.N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.010%03119/20043/19/2004 100.0000 0.000 0.00 446.08 Ono DD 03/18/04 3/l9/2004 SEC ID:994170201 3/19/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.990%03/22/2004 DD 3/22/2004 100,0000 -lS,900,000.000 -15,900,000,00 15,900,000.00 0.00 03/19/04 3/22/2004 SEC ID:99417VS63 3/22/2004 BROKER LEHMAN OOVT SECS INC, NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO Is LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.990%03/2212004 DO 3/22/2004 100.0000 0,000 0.00 1,311.75 0,00 03/19/04 3/22/2004 SEC ID:99417V563 3/22/2004 BROKER:LEHMAN DOW SECS INC,NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.000%03/23/20043/23/2004 100.0000 -15,900,000,000 -15,900,000.00 15,900,000.00 0.00 DD 03 22 04 3/23/2004 SEC ID:99417X0IS 3/23/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOS7ON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PDACO is CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.000%03/2312004 3/23/2004 100.0000 0.000 0.00 441.67 0.00 DO 03/22/04 3/23/2004 SEC ID:99417XOI5 3/23/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 16 Workbench , Transaction Detail Report ID: BRB009' @/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: OSD ocsoco NSOLIDATED.➢ 12111 rli,c-if 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Bottle Date Price Cost Amount Not Baia/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.980%03/24/20043/24/2004 100.0000 -15.900,000000 -15,900,000.00 15,900,000.00 0.00 DD 03/23/04 3/24/2004 SEC ID:99417Y393 3/24/2009 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.980%03/24/20043/24/2004 100.0000 0.000 0.00 432.83 0.00 DO 03/23/04 3/24/2004 SEC ID:99417Y393 3/24/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.970%03/2512004 DD 3/25/2004 100.0000 .15,900,000.000 .15,900,000.00 15,900,000.00 0.00 03/24/04 3/25/2004 SEC ID:99418AS01 3/25/2004 BROKER LEHMAN GOUT SECS INC,NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.970%03125/2004 DD 3/25/2004 100.0000 0.000 0.00 428.42 0.00 03/24/D4 3/25/2004 SEC ID:99418A501 3/25/2004 BROKER: LEHMAN OOVI'SBCS INC,w OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.990%03/26/2004 3/26/2004 IG0.0000 .15,300,000.000 -15,300,000.00 15,300,000.0D 0.00 DO 03/25/04 3/26/2004 SEC ID:994183707 3/26/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07SI 1102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.990%03/26/2004 3/26/2004 100.0000 0.000 0.00 420.75 0.00 DO 03/25/04 3/26/2004 SEC ID:994188707 3/26/2004 BROKER CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.980%03/29/2004 3/29/2004 100.0000 -15,300,000.G00 -15,300,000.00 15,300,000.00 0.00 DO 03/26/04 3/29/2004 SEC ID:99418CI92 3/29/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP.N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPSR-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 17 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 0 Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Bane Cuneney: USD OCSDCONSOLIDATED3uY I]0001OOflllll 3/1/2OO4 - 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Dace Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net (lain/Lose Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base IS CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 00.980%03/29/20043/29/20D4 100.0000 0,000 0.00 1,249.50 0.00 DO 03/26/04 3/29/2G04 SEC ID:99418CI92 3/29/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07SI 1102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.000%03/30/2004 3/30/20G4 100.0000 -15,300,000.000 .15.300,000.00 15,3DO,000.00 0.00 DD 03/29/04 3/30/2004 SEC ID:9941SE669 3/30/2004 BROKER:CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP,N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IS CREDIT SUISSE FB REPO 01.000%03/30/2004 3/30/2004 100.0000 0.000 0.00 425.00 0.00 DO 03/29/04 3/30/2004 SEC ID:99418E669 3/30/2004 BROKER: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON CORP.N Y OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.980%03/31/2004 DO 3/31/2004 100.0000 -15,300,000.D00 -15,300,000.00 15,300,000.00 0.00 03 30 04 / / 3 31 2D04 SEC ID:9941 3/31/2004 BROKER: LEHMAN GO SECS INC,NY OCSR07511102:LIQUIDD OPER-PIMCO IS LEHMAN CAT 2 REPO 00.980%03/31/2004 DD 3/31/2004 100.0000 0.000 0.00 416.50 0.00 03/30/04 3/31/2004 SEC ID:99418G441 3/31/2004 BROKER:LEHMAN GOVTSECS INC,NY OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 3/2/2004 1.0000 -105,901.510 -105,901.51 105,901.51 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/2/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3/2/2004 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 3/3/2004 1.G000 -184,028.080 -184,028.08 184,G28.08 0.00 SEC ID:99W85247 3/3/2004 OCSF07522202:WHO TERM OPER-PIMCO 3/3/2004 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 3/11/2004 1.0000 -310.930 -3I0.93 310.93 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/11/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/11/2004 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 18 Watkbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD ocsoco NSOLIDATED rl-2I-l11111 IR- loll 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date PriOe Coat Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Per Base Base Base S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 3/19/2004 ID000 -287,76&170 -287,768.17 287,768.17 0.00 SEC ID:9960BS247 3/19/2004 OCW07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3/1912 0 0 4 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/24/2004 1.0000 -I88,288G30 -188,288.03 188,288.03 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/24/2GG4 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PEACO 3/24/2004 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MONT 3/25/2004 L0000 -15,299.571.580 -15.299,571.58 15,299,57158 0.00 SEC ID:99WB5247 3/25/2004 OCSF07SI 1102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/25/2004 S DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MGMT 3/29/20D4 1.0000 -997,362.780 ,997,362.78 997.362,78 0.00 SEC 0:996085247 3/29/20D4 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 3/29/2004 TOTAL CASH &CASH EQUIVALENTS U.B.DOLLAR: -358,063,231.080 -358,021,278.30 358,050,741.62 0.00 TOTAL CASH&CASH EQUIVALENTS NAB&" -358,063,231.080 -358,021,278.30 359,050,741.62 0.00 FUM INCOME SECURITIES U.B.DOLLAR S COMMIT TO PUR FNMA SF MIG S.500% 3/10/2004 103.0234 -700,000.000 -715,968.75 721.164.06 5.195.31 03/01/2034 DD 03/01/04 3/15/2004 SEC ID:0IF052631 3/10/2004 BROKER BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN FRANCISCO OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-Pa1C0 S COMMIT TO PER FNMA SF MTG 5.500% 3/10/2004 103.0234 -2,100,000.000 -2,147,906.25 2.163,492.18 15.585.93 03/O1/2034 DD 03/01/04 3/15/20G4 SEC ID:O1FOS2631 3/IO/2009 BROKER BANC OF AMERICA SEC U.C.SAN FRANCISCO OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMC0 SO COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MM 6.000% 2/27/2D04 103.9369 3.000.000.000 3,108,671.87 -3,115,078.12 .6,406.25 04/O1/2034 DD 04/01/04 4/15/2004 SEC ID:O IF060642 3/1/2004 BROKER BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN . FRANCISCO OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8:34:I7AM PDT 19 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EINB009 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSDLO NSOLIDATED=-i[]EJ^_ULi IUh 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Statue: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Lose TYPe Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base S COMMIT TO FOR FNMA SF MTG 6.000% 2/27/2004 103.8359 -1,000,000.000 -1,036,223.96 1,038,359.37 2,135.41 04/01/2034 DD 04/01/04 4/15/2004 SEC m:01FO60642 3/I/2004 BROKER:BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN FRANCISCO OCSP07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S COMMIT TO PLR FNMA SF MTG 6,000% 2/27/2004 103.8359 -2,000,000,000 -2,072,447.91 2,076,718.75 4,270.84 04/01/2034 DD 04/01/04 4/15/2004 SEC ID:0IF060642 3/1/20D4 BROKER:BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN FRANCISCO OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S COMMIT TO FUR FNMA SF MTO 6.000% 3/24/2004 103.8359 -2,000,000.000 .2.076,718.75 2,076,718.75 0.00 04/01/2034 DD 04/01/04 4/15/2OD4 SEC ID:01F060642 3/24/2004 BROKER GOLDMAN SACHS&00,NY OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S FNMA POOLY0763307 6.000%04/01/2034 2/27/2004 104.1797 -500,000.000 -517,500.00 520,898.43 3,398.43 DO 03/01/04 3/15/2004 SEC ID:31404BAG7 3/1/2004 BROKER:BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN FRANCISCO OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO IS FNMA POOL#0763307 6.000%04101/2034 2/27/2004 104.1797 0.000 0.00 1,166.67 0.00 DO 03/01/04 3/15/2004 SEC ID:31404BA07 3/I/2OD4 BROKER:BANC OF AMERICA SEC LUC,SAN FRANCISCO OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO S FNMA POOL10772131 6.000%11/01/2033 2/27/2004 1G4.1797 -345,534.040 -357,627.73 359,976.28 2.349.55 DD 02/01/04 3/1512004 SEC ID:31404LY46 3/1/2004 BROKER BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN FRANCISCO OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IS FNMA POOL 00M131 6.000%11/01120M 2/27/2004 104-1797 0.000 0.00 806.25 0.00 DD 02/01/04 3/15/2004 SEC ID:31404LY46 3/I/2004 BROKER:BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN FRANCISCO OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8-34:17AM PDT 20 Warkbeerh Transaction Detail Report ID: EMMOD9 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSDLO NSOLI DATEDEVj 90 n00 CO DOI:. 3/l/2004 - 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date PriQe Coat Amount Net Gain/Lose TYPO Description Reported Date Base Sharee/Par Base BaseBase S FNMA POOLNOW3944 6.000%03/01/2034 2/27/2004 104.1797 -154,465.000 -159,871.27 160,92L15 1,G49.88 DO 03/O1/04 3/15/2004 SEC ID:31404NZH2 3/1/2004 BROKER: BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN FRANCISCO OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IB FNMA POOL40773944 6.000%03/01/2034 2/27/2004 104.1797 0,000 0.00 360.42 0.00 OD 03/Ol/04 3/15/2004 SEC ID:31404NZH2 3/1/2004 BROKER: BANC OF AMERICA SEC LLC,SAN FRANCISCO OCSFW522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.B.DOLLAR: .5,799,999.040 -5,975,592.75 6,005,504.19 27,678.10 TOTAL FIRED INCOME SECURITIES BABE: -5,799,999.040 -5,975.592.75 6,005,504.19 27,578.10 TOTAL BALES BABE: -363,863,230.120 -363,996,871.05 364,056,245.81 27,578.10 PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS I =INCOME SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR PD WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE 9000-111507.500% 3/I/2004 100.0000 -785,710 .768.65 785.71 17.06 12/01120 30 DO 10/21/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:302998GE3 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FHLMC GROUP N04-0353 7.500%I0/01/2004 3/I/2004 100.0000 -64.250 -65.88 64.25 -1.63 DO 03/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3128DBMA2 3/1/20G4 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMC0 PDC FHLMC M ULTICLASS MTG SER E3 A VAR RT 2/1/2004 100.0000 23,102.150 23,126.76 -23,102.15 24.61 OS/15/2032 DO 12/O1/97 2/1/2004 SEC ID:3133TCE95 3/l/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO PD FHLMC M UL17CUSS MTO SER E3 A VAR RT 2/1/2004 100.0000 -23,108.450 -23,133.07 23,108.45 -24.62 08/15/2032 DD 12/O1/97 2/1/2004 SEC ID:3133TCE95 3/I/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 21 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EW8009 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSDLO ISO LI DAT F.D!ID2 npn'i IC,,, 3/1/2004 - 3131/2004 Statue: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date PriOe Cost Amount Net(lain/Lose TYPO Description Reported Date Base Shares/Per Base Base use PD FNLMC MULTICLASS MTO SER E3 A VAR RT 3/I/2004 100.0000 -22,855.950 -22,880.30 22,855.95 -24.35 OB/15/2032 DD 12/01/97 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3133TCE95 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNLMC GROUP478-6064 6.384%01/01/2028 3/1/2004 100.0000 -179.660 -175.28 179.66 4.38 OD 12/01/97 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31348SWZ3 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLa0254510 5.D00%ll/01/2017 3/l/2004 100.0000 -15,616.840 -16,085.35 15,616.84 -468.51 DD 10/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31371 KVB4 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLN0254631 5.000%02/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 .2,661.200 -2,741.04 2,661.20 -79.84 DD OI/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31371KY47 3/I/2004 OCSP07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLM0254760 5.000%06/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -3,060.810 -3,152.63 3.060.81 -91.82 DD 05/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31371 K5V9 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCG PD FNMA POOLa0254866 5.000%09/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -980.250 -1,009.66 980.25 -29.41 DD 08/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:313711.CB3 3/I/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLM0254953 5.000%11/01/2018 3/1/20G4 100.0000 -8,409.360 -8,517.10 8,409.36 -107.74 DD 10/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC TO:31371 LE21 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER.PIMCO PD FNMA POOL00254987 5.000%12/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -13,735.140 -13,911.12 13,735.14 -175.98 DD 11/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31371 LF46 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLe0323980 6.000%04/01/2014 3/1/2004 100.0000 -6,545.230 -6,833.63 6,545.23 -288.40 DD 09/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3137472M0 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 22 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009' ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Baca Carreaey: D9D OCSDCO 4SOLIDATED]N2�-]U[10000�110 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Batw: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date PriOe Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/par Be" Base Base PD FNMA POOLN0357328 5.000%01/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -875.640 -901.91 875.64 -26.27 DD 01/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31376J4M8 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLN0357430 5.00D%09/01/2018 3/1/2004 100,0000 -23,755.980 -24,023.23 23,755.98 -267.25 DD 09/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31376KA71 3/1/2004 OCSFD7522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOL40456482 6.000%02/01/2014 3/1/2004 100.0000 -636,230 -559.86 536.23 -23.63 DD 02101/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31381 CCT2 3/1/2004 OCSF07S22202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCG PD FNMA POOL NOW%49 6.000%09/01/2014 3/1/2004 100.0000 -25,563.550 -26,689.94 25,563.55 -1,126.39 DD 09/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:313830MO 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA FOOLN0535451 6.000%06/01/2015 3/1/2OD4 100.0000 -4.492.380 -4,690.33 4,492.38 -197.95 DD 07/01/00 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31384VZ08 3/I/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOL40535672 6.000%01/01/2016 3/1/2004 10D.0000 -116,353.410 -121,480.23 116,353.41 -5,126.82 DD 12/01100 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31384 WCH l 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLN0545296 6,DOD%11/01/2016 3/1/2004 100.0000 -41,371.350 A3,194.28 41,371.35 1,822.93 DD 10/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31385H%7D 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLN0545580 6.000%03/01/2017 3/1/2004 100.0000 -5,411,330 -5,649.77 5,411.33 -238.44 DD 03/01/02 3/I/2004 SEC ID:31385JCW 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-RMCO PD FNMA POGLNG555101 6.OD0%10/01/2017 3/1/2004 100.0000 -6,042.820 -6,309.08 6,042A2 -266.26 OD 11/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:313BSWU23 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 23 Workbench Transaction Detail Report 1D: LVB009 /© Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Bate Currency: UBD OCSDLO NSOLIDATEDIIR2 LI JOCD]011l Di': .3/l/2004 - 3/.31/2004 Statue: FINAL Trade Date Tran Battle Date Price cost Amount Not Gain/Loss TYPO Description Reported Data Base Shares/Par Base Base Base PD FNMA POOLe0555363 5.000%04/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -6.899.760 -7,106.75 6,899.76 -205.99 DD 03/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31385WSY 1 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-FIMCO PD FNMA POOLM0555453 5.000%05/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -616.330 -624.23 616.33 -7.90 DO 04/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31385XBW6 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-RMCO PD FNMA POOL00555545 5.000%06/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -6,534.940 -6,730.99 6,534.94 -196.05 DD 05/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31385XES2 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLe0555621 5.000%07/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -22,302.960 -22,553.87 22,302.96 -250.91 DD 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31WSXG68 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLe0576386 6.000%05/01/2016 3/1/2004 100.0000 -357.930 -373.70 357.93 -15.77 DD OS/01/Ol 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31386XJ72 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLe0576739 5.000%04/01/2016 3/1/2004 100.0000 -20,647.970 -21,557.77 20,647.97 -909.80 DD 04/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31386XV86 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOL40580888 6.000%05/01/2016 3/1/2004 100.0000 -7,380.830 -7,706.05 7,380.83 -325.22 DD 05/0l/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31387DJ91 3/I/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOL 40594002 6.000%07/01/2016 3/1/2004 100.0000 .14,868.210 -15,523.34 14,868.21 -655.13 DD07/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31387T3K8 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLe0597376 6.000%09/01/2016 3/1/2004 100.0000 -1,454.280 -1,518.36 1,454.28 -64.08 DD OB/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31387XT96 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 24 Workbench Transaction Detail Report m: swsoo9 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category ease Currency: USED OCSOLO NSOLI DATE Dn n ic,lanwini 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 statue: FlasL Trede Date Tran Settle Date woe Cost Amount Net Bain/Lose TYPO Description Reported Date Base shame/Per Base Base Base PD FNMA POOL40605259 6.000%09/01/2016 3/1/2004 100.0000 -8,130,590 -8,488.84 8,130.59 -358.25 DO 09/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31388HM01 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER.PIMCO PD FNMA POOLp0608366 6.000%10/01/2016 3/1/2004 100.0000 -9,318.740 -9,729.35 9,318.74 -410.61 DD 09/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31388U78 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOL#0616734 6.0W%12/01/2016 3/1/2004 100.0000 -720.800 -752.56 720.80 -31.76 DO 12/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31388WEF9 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA PO01,e0630812 6.W0%02/01/2017 3/1/2004 100.0000 -17,578,780 -18,353.35 17,578.78 -774.57 DD 02/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3I389NYH2 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLOO632376 6.000%07/01/2017 3/1/2004 100.0000 -30.035.340 -31.358.77 30,035.34 -1,323.43 DD 07/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31389QQSO 3/l/2009 OCSF07522202:TANG TERM OPER-PIMCG PD FNMA POOLM0653116 6.OW%07/01/2017 3/1/2004 100.0000 -19,179.570 -20,024.67 19,179.57 -845.10 DO 07/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31390QSD8 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER.PIMCO PD FNMA POOLe0673280 6.000%08/01/2017 3/1/2004 100.0000 -914.570 -954.87 914.57 .40.30 DD 11/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31391 KitE 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLe0681309 S.OW%02/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 .7,871.220 -8,107.36 7,871.22 -236.14 DD 02/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31391Y3S4 3/1/2004 OCSF07622202:LONG TERM OPER-MC0 PD FNMA POOLM0681334 5.0W%02/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -835.080 -860.13 835.08 -25.D5 DD OI/01/03 3/I/2004 SEC ID:31391 Y4T1 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 25 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB0D9 ((/ Meilon Reported by Transaction Category Baee Currency- BED OCSDLO 4SOLIDATED➢B2J:J000JCI11:10C: .3/1/2004 - .3/.31/2004 stataa: FINAL Trade Date Trap Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net(lain/Lose Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Bsee Bass PD FNMA POOLa0684908 5.000%06/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -3,655.510 -3,702.35 3,655.51 -46.84 DO 05/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3I40003R1 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLe0685200 5.000%03/0112018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -4,491.140 -4,548.68 4,491.14 -57.54 DD 03/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31400EGH7 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA MOL40685665 5.000%02/01/2018 3/1/20G4 100.0000 -625.540 -644.31 625.54 -18.77 DD 02/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31400EW22 3/l/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLe0686318 5.000%03/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -5,539.910 -5,706.11 5,539.91 -166.20 DD 03/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31400FPB7 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLN0688739 5.000%06/Ol/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -536.220 -552.31 536.22 -16.09 DD 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31400JEL9 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOL90689859 5.000%05/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -7,012,610 -7,102.46 7,012.61 -89.85 DD 05/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3140 WGB 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA FOOLe0693834 5.000%03/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -19.536,500 -20.122.60 19,536.50 -586.10 DO 03/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31400FY70 3/1/2004 OCW07522202:LONG TERM OPER-FIMCO PD FNMA POOL40695852 5.000%05/01/2018 3/1/20G4 100.0000 -4,691.660 -4,832.41 4,691.66 -140.75 DD OS/O1/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31400SBVG 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLr0695889 5.000%05/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 .11,080.140 -11,412.54 11,080.14 -332.40 DD 05/01/03 3/1/2004 SECID:31400SC23 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 26 Workbench Transaction Detail Report M. BWB009, /© Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: DBD ocsDcoesoLloATED�BP2-rinm,iniulGrj 3/1/2004 - 3/31/20M status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Cost Amount Not Bain/Lose TYPO Description Reported Date Base Bbares/Par Base Base Base PD PNMA POOLe0697026 5.000%05/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 .625.400 -644.16 625.40 -18.76 DD04 01 03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31400TLF2 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLe0698939 6.000%09/01/2017 3/1/2004 100.0000 -539.270 -563.03 539.27 -23.76 DO 03/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31400VFY2 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLs0702210 5.000%05/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -14,875.250 -15,321.51 14,875.25 -446.26 DO 05/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401ADP9 3/1/2009 CCSF07522202:LONO TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLN0702328 5.000%05/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -1,115.400 -1,129.69 1,115.40 -14.29 DO 04/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401 AHD2 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLOO703195 6.000%01/01/2017 3/I/2004 100.0000 -872.780 -911.24 872.78 -38.46 DD04 0l 03 SEC ID:31401 SOC3 3/1/2004 OCSP07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 3/1/2004 PD FNMA POOLs0709148 5.000%06/01/2018 3/1/2004 100,0000 -1,402.840 -1,444.93 1,402.84 -42.09 OD 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401H2M7 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OFER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLs0709360 5G00%G7/O1/2018 3/I/2004 100.0000 -5,063,410 -5,128.28 5,063.41 -64.87 DO 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3140IJB56 3/l/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLs0709826 5.000%06/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -5,081.380 -5.146.49 5,081.38 .65.11 DD 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ED:31401JSP4 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLs0709917 5.000%05/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -3,020.990 -3,059.70 3,020.99 -38.71 DD O6/O1/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401JVJ4 3/I/2009 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCG 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 27 Workbench Transaction Detail Report m: BW8009 @/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Curran,: DSD OCSD-00NSOLI DATE DIH-2^1-nnnnlLi In[l 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date PriCe Cost Amount Net Gain/Lou Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base PD FNMA POOLs0709963 5.000%06/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -105.470 -106.82 105.47 -1.35 DD 06/01/03 3/I/2004 SEC ID:31401JW O 3/I/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOL 0071023S 5.000%06/01/2018 3/l/2004 100.0000 -18,300.120 -18,849.12 18.300.12 -549.00 DD 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401 XBC8 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-Pa1C0 PD FNMA POOLs0713344 5.000%06/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -1,680.600 -1,73L02 I,680.60 -50.42 DD 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401NP52 3/I/1009 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OFER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOL40713365 5.000%07/01/2018 3/l/2004 100.0000 -5,975.520 -6,052.08 5,975,52 -76.56 DD 07/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3140INQ81 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PO4CO PD FNMA POOLs0720319 5.000%07/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -54,800.430 -55,502.56 54,800.43 -702.13 DD 07/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3140IW04S 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOL40720369 5.000%06/01/2018 311/2004 100.0000 .35.072.740 -36.124.92 35,072.74 -1,052.18 DD 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401WJN0 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-Pa1C0 PD FNMA POOL40721629 5.000%07/01/2018 3/l/2004 100.0000 -3,848.960 .3,964.43 3.848.96 .115.47 DD 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401XM4 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMC0 PD FNMA POOLr0723487 5.000%06/01/2018 3/l/2004 100.0000 -967.250 -978.13 967.25 -10.88 DD 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31402AXQ4 3/1/2004 OCSF075222D2:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOL40729601 5.000%07/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -5,235.540 .5,302.62 5.235.54 .67.08 DD 07/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC to:31402HRW3 3/I/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 28 Workbench Transaction Detail Report m: BWB009" /© Mellon Reported by Transaction Category B.Cor eeey: Den OCSDLO NSOLI DATE D3H2-1]O U0 MIS H 1Ii 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tract Settle Date Price cost Amount Not Gain/Lou TYPO Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Bsea PD FNMA POOL40732873 5.000%11/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -135.190 -136.92 135.19 -1.73 DO 10/01/03 3/1/2D04 SEC ID:31402MMS 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOL#0737130 5.000%10/0112018 3/1/2004 100,0000 -14,745.290 -14,934.21 14,745.29 -188.92 DD 10/01/03 3/1/2GG4 SEC ID:31402S4P9 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-AMCO PD FNMA POOL40738211 5.000%10/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -10,572.030 -10,707.48 10,572.03 -135.45 DD 10/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31402UDQ2 3/1/2009 OCW07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOL40738487 5.000%10/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -4,851.620 -4,913.78 4,851.62 -62.16 DO 10/01/03 3/1/20D4 SEC ID:314O2UNC2 3/I/2004 OCSP07522202:TANG TEPM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOL4074G471 5.000%10/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -3,619.600 -3,665.98 3,619.60 46.38 DD 10/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31402Wr40 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMC0 PD FNMA POOL40740748 5.000%10/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -3,523.890 -3,569.G4 3,523.89 .45.15 DD 11/01/03 3/1/20G4 SEC ID:31402WSN7 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOL#0743868 5.ODO%11/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -720.550 -729.78 720.55 -9.23 DO 10/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31403BMR1 3/1/2004 OCW07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLOO744008 S.00D%07/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -5,247.670 -5,314.91 5.247.67 -67.24 DD 09/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31W3BR54 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOL40744316 5.000%09/01/2018 3/1/20G4 100.0000 -2.579.680 -2,612.73 2.579.68 -33.05 DD 09/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31403B3Z4 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8:34:17" PDT 29 Workbench Transaction Detall Report ID: BWB009 /© Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Cuneney: USD OCSDLO NSOLIDATED"4rt -I (iu(iirn'Iru 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Statue: FINAL Trade Date Tran Battle Date Price cost Amount Net Clain/Loss TYPO Description Reported Date Base Shares/Per Bass Base Base PD FNMA POOLe0747914 5.0D0%11/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -1,717.410 -1,739.41 1,717.41 -22.00 DD 11/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31403F3X0 3/1/2009 0CM07522202:LONG TERM OPER-MMCO PD FNMA POOL00748400 5.000%08/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -1.014.580 -1,027.58 1,014.58 -13.00 DD 09/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31403ONR9 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLa0748899 5.000%12/01/2018 3/1/2004 100,0000 .13,157.950 -13,326.54 13,157.95 -168.59 GO 11/01/03 3/l/2004 SEC ID:31403G7L0 3/1/2004 OCW07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLe0750377 5.000%11/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -17,503.510 -17,727.77 17,503.51 -224.26 DD 11/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31403JUA2 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLe0750380 5.000%11/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -53,508.260 -54,193.83 53.508.26 -685.57 DD 11/01/03 3/I/2004 SEC ID:3I403JUD6 3/l/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLr0750445 5.0D0%11/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -750.020 .759.63 750.02 .9.61 DO 11/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31403JWE2 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOL#0751960 5.000%12/01/2018 3/1/2004 100,0000 -16,977.040 -17,194.56 16,977.04 -217.52 DO 11/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31403LMHI 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOL 00753425 5.000%Il/0l/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -5,925,120 -5.993.63 5,925.12 -68.51 DD 11/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC 10:31403NA23 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD FNMA POOLa0755165 5.000%12/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 .17,724.340 -17,951.43 17,724.34 -227.09 DD 11/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31403Q6A3 3/1/2009 OCSP07522202:TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8.34:17" PDT 30 Warkbench Transaction Detail Repeat ID: BW6OO9 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Cuneacy: UBD OCSDLO NSOLIDATED:M12]311111r l'u`,"i',,I 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Statue: FIRAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price cost Amount Net tiaiu"/Goes TyPe Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base PD FNMA POOL#0756372 5.0W%11/01/2018 3/1/2004 100.0000 -4,033.740 -4,080.38 4,033.74 -46.64 DD 11/01/O3 3/1/2004 SEC ID:314O3BIR8 3/1/2004 CCSFO75222O2:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POLL 40596612 6,500%09/15/2032 3/1/2004 100.0000 -335,100 -351.70 335.10 -16.60 DO O9/O1/O2 3/1/2004 SEC ID:362WBYH4 3/1/2OO4 OCSFO75222O2:TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD ONMA POOL N05693586.SDD%O4/15/2O32 3/1/2004 100.0000 -56,487,940 -57,811.88 56.487.94 -1,323.94 DO 04/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36MOQQR3 3/1/2004 OCSFO75222O2:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOLN05696856.500%02/15/2032 3/1/2004 100.0000 -1,968,620 -2,066.13 1,968.62 .97.51 DO O2/01/O2 3/1/2004 SEC ID:362OOO282 3/1/2004 OCSFO75222O2:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOL#0570019 6.500%07/15/2032 3/1/2004 100.0000 -3,966.870 -4,163.35 3,966.87 -196.48 DD W/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:362OORC348 3/1/2OO4 OCSFO75222O2:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOL#0574323 6.5W% 12/15/2O31 3/1/2004 100.0000 -40,046.680 -42,030.24 40,046.68 -1,983.56 DD 12/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36200WAW 3/1/2004 OCSFO75222O2:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOL#0575364 6.500%11115/2031 3/1/2004 100.00OO -3,796.200 -3,984.23 3,796.2O -188.03 DD 11/01/01 1/1/2004 SEC ID:3620OXFD6 3/1/2004 OCSFO75222O2:TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOLOOSK117 6.50 06/15/2O32 3/1/2004 100.0000 -603,250 -633.13 603.25 -29.88 DD M/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:362OIM022 3/1/2004 OCSFO75222O2:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOL40587439 6.500% 11/15/2O32 3/1/2004 IW.00OO -1,671.810 -1,754.62 1.671.81 -82.81 DD 12/01/O2 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36W1 MS45 3/1/2004OCSFO75222O2:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 31 Workbench Transaction Detail Report m: E"009 Mellon Reported by Transaction Category B.Clvrency: BBD OCSDLO NSOLIDATEDTIv2 F u n u;inn lfni 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Stet": FINAL Trade Date Tran Bettie Date Price Cost Amount Not Gain/Loss TYPO Description Reported Date Be" Shares/Par Base Base Base PD ONMA POOLM0421389 6.500Y 04/15/2026 3/1/2004 100.0000 -667.340 -700.39 667.34 -33.05 DO 04/01/96 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36206OC23 3/1/2000 OCSF075222O2:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOL40438057 6.00D%05/15/2028 3/1/2004 100.0000 -26.640 .25.29 26.64 1.35 DD 05/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36207PIN9 3/1/2004 OCSFM522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD ONMA POOL80449851 6.500%01/15/2028 3/1/2004 100.0000 -59.990 -62.96 59.99 -2.97 DD 01/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3620BMW 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-MMCO PD ONMA POOLN0457814 6.000% 10/15/2028 3/1/2004 100,0000 -1,447.170 -1,373.68 1,447.17 73.49 DO 10/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36208QSB3 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD ONMA POOLM04655466.000%OS/15/2028 3/1/2004 100.0000 -845.250 -802.33 845.25 42.92 DD 08/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36209AET3 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOL#04655556.000%09/15/2028 3/1/2004 100.0000 -921.450 -874.66 921.45 46.79 DO 09/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36209AE48 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:TANG TERM OPER-MMCO PD GNMA POOL#04669456.500%06/15/2028 3/1/2004 100.0000 -5,450.600 -5.720.58 5,450.60 -269.98 DD 05/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:362098TA6 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOL#0467279 6.000% 10/15/2028 3/1/2004 100.0000 -34.110 -32.38 34.11 1.73 DD 10/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:362090CQ7 3/I/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOL MD467286 6.000%10/15/2028 3/1/20G4 100.0000 -553.320 -525.22 553.32 28.10 DD 10/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36209OC%2 3/1/2004 OCSF075222O2:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 32 Workbench Transaction Detail Report M.- Ea'B009, @/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: DSD OCSDCONSOLIDATED3112 DOOM=DI11 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 statue: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Lose TYPO Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base PD ONMA POOL N0468052 6.500%07/15/2028 3/1/2004 100.0000 -404A70 -424,92 404.87 2005. DD 07/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:362D9C5M4 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PMCO PD ONMA POOL#0468330 6.ODD%05/15/2028 3/1/2004 100.0000 -34.920 -33.15 34.92 177 DD OS/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36209DHF4 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PMCO PD GNMA PMLONW39 6.000 06/15/2028 3/1/2004 100.0000 -514.730 -488.59 514.73 26.14 DD OB/01/98 3/l/2004 SEC ID:362D9DHQO 3/I/2004 OCSFU7522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOL 40469688 6.000%11/15/2028 3/1/2004 100.0000 -591.270 -561.24 591.27 30.03 DO 11/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36209EXRO 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:TANG TERM OPER-PMCO PD ONMA POOL40476041 6.500%06/15/2028 3/1/2004 100.0000 -265.220 -277.94 265.22 -12.72 DD 06/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:362D9M7E7 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PMCO PD ONMA POOLN0478626 6.5DO%01/15/2029 3/1/2004 100.0000 -214.850 -225.16 214.85 -10.31 DD 01/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:362D9QV79 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PI14CO PD ONMA POOL/0480598 6.50D% 10/15/2028 3/l/2004 100.0000 -167.750 -175.80 167.75 4.05 DD 10/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36209S3F6 3/I/T009 OCSF07UMW:LONG TERM OPER-PMCO PD GNMA POOL#0483452 6.000%09/15/2028 3/1/2004 100.0000 -19.500 .18.51 19.50 0.99 DD 09/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC 00:36209V/BV3 3/1/2004 OCSFU752M02:TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD ONMA POOLNM85527 6.5 606/15/2031 3/1/2004 100.D000 -21,085.370 -22,129.75 21,085.37 1,044.38 DD 06/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36209YLG1 3/t/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PUT 33 Workbench Transaction Detail ftwA m: EWB009 @/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: WD OCSDCO 4SOLJDATEDMT2iionn"nnnGil 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tree settle Date ice cost Amount Not Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date DR" Shares/Par Base Base .Base PD GNMA POOLr04856106.500%07/15/2031 3/1/2004 100,0000 -16,063,860 -16,859.52 16,063.86 -795.66 DO 07/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36209YN38 3/I/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD ONMA POOL 00485682 6.500%08/15/2031 3/1/2004 100,0000 -4,822,040 .5,060.88 4,822.04 -238.84 D008/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36209YRB6 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD ONMA POOLN0485703 6.500%08/15/2031 3/1/2004 100,0000 -12,242.300 -12,848.68 12,242.30 -606.38 DD 08/01/01 3/1/20G4 SEC ID:36209YRY6 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD ONMA POOL#04867206.000% 12/15/2028 3/1/2004 100.0000 -548,560 -520.70 548.56 27.86 DD 12/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC TO:36210AVM6 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD ONMA POOL#0491103 6.000%01/15/2029 3/1/2004 100.0000 A,046ASO -3,841.37 4,046.88 205.51 DD 01/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36210FRY4 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD ONMA POOLN0496461 6.000%01/15/2029 3/1/2004 100.0000 -14,577.640 -13,837.37 14,577.64 740.27 DD 01/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36210MQN4 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD ONMA POOL 004973436.000% 12/15/2028 3/1/2004 100.0000 -1.541.360 -1,463.09 1,541.36 78.27 DO 12/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36210NP45 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO PD ONMA POOL40499153 6.000%02/15/2029 3/1/2004 100.0000 -18.010 -17.10 18.01 0.91 DD 02/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3621000E5 3/I/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOL#0500917 6.000%04/15/2029 3/1/2004 100.0000 -969.420 -920.19 969.42 49.23 DD D4/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36210WAO 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 34 Workbench Transaction Detail Report m: EWa009 /© Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Same Currency: USE, ocsDLO NSOLIDATEMIL20700=11I O 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 status: FINAL Trade Date Trap Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Lose Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Sale PD GNMA POOL#0503388 6.000%03/15/2029 3/1/2004 100.0000 -17,350.120 -16,469.06 17,350.12 881.06 DD 03/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36210VF55 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOL 40506636 6.000% 04/15/2029 3/1/2004 100,0000 -1,606,460 -1,524.88 1,606.46 81.58 DO 04/O1/99 3/112004 SEC ID:36210YY90 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOLY05122356.500% 11/15/2029 3/I/2004 100.0000 -15.260 -16.02 15.26 -0.76 DD 11/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC 0:36211ORC6 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOL 40514326 6.500 07/l5/2029 3/1/2004 100.0000 -277.310 -290.61 277.31 -13.30 DD 07/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36211JLF2 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOL905WO53 6.500%04/15/2031 3/1/2004 100.0000 -789.370 -828.47 789.37 -39.10 DD 04/Ol/Ol 3/l/2004 SEC ID:36212CZ33 3/1/2009 OCW07522202:LONG TERM OPER-Pa1CO PD GNMA POOLN0537885 6.500%02/15/2031 3/1/2004 100.0000 -146.550 -153.81 146.55 -7.26 DD O2/01/OI 3/1/2004 SEC 03:36212MREl 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOL#0547512 6.500%04/15/2031 3/1/2004 100.0000 -845.780 -887.67 845.78 -4L89 DD 04/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36212YGV9 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOL 005477156.500%02/15/2031 3/1/2004 100.0000 -168.600 -176.69 168.60 -8.09 DD 02/01101 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36212YN82 3/1/2009 OCW07522202:TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA POOLM0552322 6.500%01/15/2032 3/1/2004 100.0000 -3,487.770 -3,660.52 3,487.77 -172.75 DD 0l/O1/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:362I3ESK3 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 35 Workbench Transaction Detail Report m: EWBDD9 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: e8D OCSDLO NSOLIDATEDM2 I-JiIIID]OGJ1Ih 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 statue FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date PriCe Cost Amount Net Bain/Low Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base PD ONMA POOLN0552466 6.500%03/15/2032 3/1/2004 100.0000 -46,606.500 -48.914.98 46,606.50 -2,308.48 DD 03/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36213EW36 3/1/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD ONMA POOLr05526596.500%07/15/2032 3/1/2004 100.0000 -14735.670 -15,465.55 14,735.67 -729.88 DD 07/01/02 3/I/2004 SEC ID:36213ESU6 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD ONMA POOLr0561017 6.500%07/15/2031 3/1/2004 100,0000 -37,821.440 -39.694.78 37,821.44 -1,873.34 DD 07/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:362I3Q029 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA II POOL#0080023 VAR RT 12/20/2026 3/1/2004 100.0000 -4,629.070 -4,705.74 4,629.07 .76.67 DO 12/01/96 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36225CA29 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA It POOL r080088M 7.375%06/20/2027 3/1/2004 100.0000 -22,878.370 -23,378.83 22,878.37 -500.46 DD 06/01/97 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36225CC20 3/1/2004 OCSP07522202:LONG TERM OPER-RMCO PD ONMA II POOL r0080395 VAR RT 04/20/2030 3/1/2004 100.0000 -7,241.370 -7,175.74 7,241.37 65.63 DD 04/O1/00 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36225CNM4 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PD ONMA II POOL r080408X 6.500%05/20/2030 3/1/2004 100.0000 -60539.630 -59,924.77 60,539.63 614.86 DD 05/01/00 3/1/2004 SEC It 36225CN28 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO PD GNMA GTD REMIC TR 2000-9 FH VAR RT 3/16/2004 100.0000 -17,779.940 -17.779.94 17,779.94 0.00 02/16/2030 3/16/2004 SEC ID:38371-14NX9 3/16/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO PO RESIDENTIAL ASSET 03-RSI I AIIB VAR RT 3/25/2004 100.0000 -7,668.790 -7.668.79 7.668.79 0.00 12/25/2033 DD 12/30/03 3/25/2004 SEC ID:760985K83 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 36 Workbench. Transaction Detail NeFo.tm: EWBw9- /© Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USE, OCSDLO NSOLIDATED IN2'1 It 1U'I]I111 ll111 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 statue: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settlb Date Price Cost Amount Not Gain/Lose Type Description, Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base PD SEA OTD DEV PARTN 2001-20C 16.340% 3/1/2004 100.0000 -236,390.200 -236,390.20 236,390.20 0.00 03101/2021 3/1/2004 SEC ID:83162CW0 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO TOTAL FINED INCOME SECURITIES U.B.DOLLAR: .1,647,000.460 .1,580,858.41 1,547,000.45 .33,857.96 TOTAL FIRED INCOME SECURITIES EASE: .1,547,000.460 .1,580,858.41 1,547,000.45 .33,857.96 TOTAL PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS BABB: -1,347,000."0 -1,880,858.41 1,547,OOe.46 -33,857.96 MATURITIES CASE a CASH EQUIVALENTS U.B.DOLLAR MT DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 03/08/2004 3/8/2004 100,0000 -4,500.000,000 -4,494,000.00 4,494,000.00 0.00 SEC ID:26354AC85 3/8/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUIDOPER-PIMCO 3/8/2004 MT FEDERAL HOME LN BK CONS DISC N MAT 3/12/2004 100.0000 4,500,000.000 -4.488.395.00 4.488.395.00 0.00 03/12/20N 3/12/2004 SEC ID:313384UE7 3/12/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO MT FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CINS DISC MAT 3/17/2004 100.0000 -900,000,000 -895,162.50 895,162.50 0.00 03/17/2004 3/17/2004 SEC ID:313384UK3 3/17/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO MT FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CONS DISC MAT 3/19/2004 100.0000 -4,100,000.000 -4,096,874.89 4,096,874,89 0.00 03/19/2004 3/19/2004 SEC ID:313384UM9 3/19/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO MT FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORD DISC MAT 3/31/2004 100,0000 -3,800,000.000 -3,778,055.00 3,778,055.00 0.00 03/31/2004 3/31/2004 SEC ID:313396UM 3/31/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER PIMCO TOTAL CASH a CASH EQUIVALENTS U.B.DOLLAR .17,800,000.000 -17,752,487.39 17,752,487.39 0.00 TOTAL CASH B CASH EQUIVALENTS BABE: -17,800,000.000 -17,752,087.39 17,752,487.39 0.00 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 37 Workbench Transaction Detail Report M: EP7B009 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD ocsDaoeSOLIDATEDf➢nr2 )0oa11.lD 1(;( 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Statue: FINAL Trade Date Tran Bettie Date Price cost Amount Net (lain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR MT CMOROUP INC BE GLOBAL NT FLTG RT 3/9/2004 100.0000 -2,700,000.000 -2,700,459.00 2,700,000.00 -459.00 03/09/2004 DO 03/09/01 3/9/2004 SEC ID: 172967BEG 3/9/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO TOTAL MATURITIES BASE: -20,300,000.000 -20,452,946.39 20,452,487.39 -459.00 CORPORATE ACTIONS F=D INCOME SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR CD DEPOSITED AS A RESULT OF AN CONSENT 3/1/2004 0.000 100.00 100.00 100.00 SOLICITATION. SEC ID:045906BU7 3/1/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO nITERE8T CASH i CABS EQUIVALENTS U.B.DOLLAR IT DU PONT DE NEMOUR DISC 03/08/2004 3/8/2004 4,500,000.000 6,000.00 6,000.00 0,00 SEC ID:26354AC85 3/8/2004 OCSP07SI 1102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/8/2004 IT FEDERAL HOME LN BE CONS DISC N MAT 3/12/2004 4,500,000.000 11,605.00 11,605,00 0.00 03/12/2004 3/12/2004 SEC ID:313384UE7 3/12/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IT FEDERAL HOME LN BKS CINS DISC MAT 3/17/2004 900.000.000 4.837.50 4,837.50 0.00 03/17/2004 3/17/2004 SEC m:313384UK3 3/17/2004 OCSP07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IT FEDERAL HOME LN SKS CONS DISC MAT 3/19/2004 4,100,000.000 3,125.11 3,125.11 0.00 03/19/2004 3/19/2004 SEC ID:313384UM9 3/19/1004 OCSM522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FEDERAL HOME LN MTO CORP DISC MAT 3/31/2004 3,800,000.000 21,945.00 21.945.00 0.00 03/31/2004 3/31/2004 SEC ID:313396U74 3/31/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34A 7AM PDT 38 W9rkbeneh „ Transaction Detail ReyertlD: EWB009' 0 Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OCSDCO 4SOLIDATED]AC2 i 'imr; ii of 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 statue: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date ice Cost Amount Net{lain/Lose TYPO Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Be" CW SHORTTERM FOS INTADJ NETOF 3/31/2004 0.000 -1,099.75 .1.099.75 0.00 OVERNIGHT INTEREST 3/31/2004 SEC ID:990D00PJ4 3/31/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IT DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/2/2004 0.000 2.059.06 2,059.06 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/1/2004 OCSF07511102!LIQUID OPER-PIMCO 3/2/2004 IT DREYFUS TREASURY CASH MOMT 3/2/2004 0.000 350.03 350.03 0.00 SEC ID:996085247 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 3/2/2004 TOTAL CASH a CASH EQUFVALENTS U.B.DOLLAR 17.800.000.000 48,821.95 49,921.95 0.00 TOTAL CASH a CASH EQUrVALE ITS BABE: 17,800,000.000 48,821.95 48,821.95 0.00 FULED ISCOUS SECURITIES U.S.DOLLAR IT CITIGROUP INC SR GLOBAL NT FLTG RT 3/9/2004 2,700,000.000 2,890.03 2,890.03 0.00 03/09/2004 DO 03/09/01 3/9/2004 SEC ID: 172967BEO 3/9/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IT WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE A000-111507.500°A 3/3/2004 780.270 5,907.15 5.907.15 0.00 12/01/2030 DO 10/21/99 2/1/2004 SEC ID:302998GE3 3/3/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT WMP/HUNTOON PAIGE#000-11 ISO 7.500% 3/30/2004 785.710 5,902.28 5,902.28 0.00 12/01/203ODD 10/21/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:302998GE3 J/30/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FHLMC GROUPO04-0353 7.500%10/01/2004 3/15/2004 64.250 318.64 318.64 0.00 DO W101/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3128DBMA2 3/IS/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FHLMC MULTICLASS MTO SER E3 A VAR RT 3/15/2004 6.300 6.30 6.30 0.00 0B/15/2032 DO 12/01/97 2/1/2004 SEC ID:3133TCE95 3/15/2004 OCWW522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 39 Workbench Transaction Detail Repon ID: Eweo09 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Be Canesor: ORD ocsnLO NsoLIDATEDM2,. 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Sft, : FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date PriOe cost Amount Net Gain/Lou Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Per Base Be" Base IT FHLMCMULTICL4SS MID SERE3A VARRT 3/15/2OD4 23.108.450 3,363.56 3,363.56 0.00 08/15/2032 DD 12/01/W 2/1/2004 SEC ID:3133TCE95 3/IS/2004 OCW07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO IT FHLMCMULTICIASS CIF SER 16MZ 6.000% 3/2/2004 15.236.300 15,236.30 15,236.30 0.00 11/15/2023DD 11/01/93 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3133T17A4 3/2/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-Pa4C0 a FHLMC GROUP478-6064 6.384%01/01/2028 3/15/2004 2,591.830 222.76 222.76 0.00 DO 12/01/97 2/1/2004 SEC ID:31348SWZ3 3/15/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN DEER 6.625% 3/15/2004 2,100,000.000 69,562.50 69,562.50 0.00 09/15/20M DO 09/01/W 3/15/20M SEC ID:31359MEY5 3/IS/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL40254510 5.000%11/01/2017 3/25/20G4 15,616.840 3,414.44 3,414A4 0.00 DO 10/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC 03:31371KVR4 3/25/2004 OCSF075222W:LONG TERM OPER-PIMC0 IT FNMA POOLM0254631 5.000%02/01/2018 3/25/2004 2.661.200 725.30 725.30 0.00 DO Ol/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31371 KY47 3/25/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OFER-PIMCO IT FNMA POO1,10254760 5.000%06101/2018 3/25/2004 3.060.810 654.92 654.92 0.00 DO 05/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31371K5V9 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO a FNMA POOL40254866 5.000%09/01/2018 3/25/2004 980.250 286.68 286.68 0.00 DD 08/01/03 3/l/2004 SEC ID:31371 LCB3 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA FOOL#0254953 5.000%11/01/2018 3/25/2004 8.409.360 1.522.67 1,522.67 0.00 DO 10/01/03 3/l/2004 SEC ID:31371LE21 3/25/20D4 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8.34:17" PDT 40 Wvkfw-h, Transaction Detail Rapert DJ: SWS009' ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Cattency: USE, OCSDCO NSOLI DATE DFUI2i1 O IIOlI]Ol Clip 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 States: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price cost Amount Net Gain/Lose Type Description Reported Date Base shares/Par Base Base Brio IT FNMA MOLN0254987 5.000%12/01/2018 3/25/2004 13,735.140 4,087.14 4,087.14 0.00 OD 11/01/03 3/1/2004 SECID:31371LF46 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL#0323980 6.000%04/01/2014 3/25/2004 6,545.230 994.81 994.81 0.00 DO 09/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31374T2M0 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-RMC0 IT FNMA POOL 00357328 5.000%01/01/2018 3/25/2004 875.640 129.84 129.84 0.00 DO 01/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3137634MB 3/25/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-RMC0 IT FNMA POOL#0357430 5.000%09/01/2018 3/25/2004 23,755.980 6,532.38 6.532.38 0.00 DD 09/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31376KA71 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL40456482 6.000%02/01/2014 3/25/2004 536.230 304.39 304.39 0.00 DD 02/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31381 CCT2 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOLs0509649 6.000%09/01/2014 3/25/2004 25,563.550 870.62 870.62 0.00 DO 09/01/99 3/I/2004 SEC ID:31383QEW0 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOLs0535451 6.000%06/01/2015 3/25/2004 4,492.380 784.72 784.72 0.00 DD 07/01/00 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31384VZQB 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-MMCO IT FNMA POOLs0535672 6.000%01/01/2016 3/25/2004 116,353,410 16,976.44 16,976.44 0.00 OD 12/01/00 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31384WCH 1 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL 40545296 6.000%11/01/2016 3/25/2004 41,371.350 5,507.57 5,507.57 0.00 DO 10/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31385HXZ0 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 41 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: BWB009 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base currency: BSD OCSDCO 4SOLIDATED9IP2,1 lln[111111'l:iflll 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 etatos: FP9AL Trade Date Tran Settle Date PriOe coat Amount Not(fain/Lou Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base IT FNMA POOLP0545580 6.000%03/01/2017 3/25/2004 5.411.330 468.78 468.78 0.00 GO 03/01102 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31385JCR7 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOLe0555101 6.OW%10/01/2017 3/25/2004 6,042.820 837.90 837.90 O.OD DD 11/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3138SWU23 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOLe0555363 5.D00%04/01/2018 3/25/2004 6,899.760 1,565.88 1,565.88 0.00 DD03101/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31385WSY 1 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOLN0555453 5.000%05/01/2018 3/25/2004 616.330 160.42 160.42 0.00 DD 04/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31385XSW6 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCG IT PNMA POOLe0555545 S.00D%06/01/2018 3/25/2004 6.534.940 1,308.25 1.308.25 0.00 DO 05/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31385XES2 3/25/2009 OCSF07522202:TANG TERM OPER-PIMCG IT FNMA POOLr0555621 5.000%07/01/2018 3/25/2004 22,302.960 4,534.41 4,534.41 0.00 DO 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31385XG68 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL40576386 6.000%05/01/2016 3/25/2004 357.930 321.33 321.33 0.00 DD 05/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31386XI72 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOLN0576739 6.000%04/01/2016 3/25/2004 20,647.970 859.19 859.19 0.00 DD 04101/O1 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31386"86 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-RMCO IT FNMA POOLM0580888 6.000%05/01/2016 3/25/20G4 7,380.830 1,106.26 1,106.26 0.00 DD 05/01/01 3/1/20G4 SEC ID:31387DJ91 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 42 Wgkbench , Transaction Detail aapan m: E"009 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Ease Currency: D8D OCSDCO NSOLIDATED317271 hill Ills, 11 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 statue: FIIIAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date PriOe coat Amount Net Gain/Lose TYPO Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base IT FNMA POOLOO594002 6.000%07/01/2016 3/25/2004 14,868.210 890.23 890.23 0.00 DD 07/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31387T3K8 3/25/2004 OCW07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOLNOS97376 6.0W%W/01/2016 3/25/2004 1,454.280 1,167.61 1,167.61 0.00 DD OB/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31387M6 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOLa06052S9 6.000%D9/01/2016 3/25/2004 8,130.590 729.86 729,86 0.00 DD 09/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3138SHMOI 3/25/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-RMCO IT FNMA POOLN0608366 6.000%10/01/2016 3/25/2004 9,318.740 477.25 477.25 0.00 DD 09/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:313881278 3/25/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL#0616734 6.000%12/01/2016 3/25/20G4 720.800 845.75 845.75 0.00 DD 12/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31388WEF9 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOLr0630812 6.000%02/01/2017 3/25/2004 17,578.780 986.92 886,92 0.00 DD 02/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31389NYH2 3/25/2009 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OWR-PIMCO IT FNMA POOLr0632376 6.000%07/01/2017 3/25/2004 30,035.340 4,008.20 4,008.20 0.00 DD 07/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31389QQW 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OFER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL40653116 6.000%07/01/2017 3/25/2004 19,179.570 2,292.31 2,292.31 0.00 DD 07/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31390QSDS 3/25/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCG IT FNMA POOLr0673280 6.000%08/01/2017 3/25/2004 914.570 936.98 936.98 0.00 DO 11/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31391P6R2 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 43 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: E916009 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Cmency: DSD OCSDCONSOLIDATEDDa200000J0fIlOf; 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 status: FINAL Trade Date Trap Settle Date Price cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base 81tares/Par Base Base Base IT FNMA POOL40681309 5.000%02/01/2018 3/25/2GD4 7,871.220 2,357.41 2,357.41 0.00 DD 02/01/03 3/l/2004 SEC ID:3139IY384 3/25/2009 OCSP07522202:LONG TERM OPER-Pa1CO IT FNMA POOLr0681334 5.000%02/01/2D18 3/25/2004 835.080 294.25 294.25 0,00 DD 01/01/03 3/1/2004 SECID:3139IY4TI 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL00684908 5.000%06/01/2018 3/25/2004 3,655.510 1,460.99 1,460.99 0.00 DD 05/01/03 3/1/20D4 SEC ID:3140GD3RI 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER.PIMCo IT FNMA 1`O01,e0685200 5.000%03/01/2018 3/25/20D4 4,491.140 839.17 839.17 0.00 DD 03/01/03 3/I/2GG4 SEC ID:31400EGH7 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL40685665 5.000%02/01/2018 3/25/2004 625.540 150.15 150.15 0.00 DO 02/O1/03 3/l/2004 SEC ID:314008W22 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POO1,40686318 5.000%03/01/2018 3/25/2004 5,539.910 1,270.62 1,270.62 0.00 DD 03/01/03 3/1/20D4 SEC ID:3 I400FPB7 3/25/2004 OCSFG7522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOLr0688739 S.ODO%06/01/2018 3/25/2004 536.220 486.95 486.95 0.00 DD 05/01/03 3/l/2004 SEC ID:31400JEL9 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POO1,40689859 5.000%05/01/2018 3/25/2004 7,012,610 526.44 526.44 0.00 DO 05/01/03 3/l/2004 SEC ID:31400KMO8 3/25/2009 OCSF07522202:TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL R0693834 S.ODD%03/01/2018 3/25/2004 19.536.500 3,061.69 3,061.69 0.D0 DD 03/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31400FY74 3/25/2004 OCSF075222O1:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 44 WrrkbenM. Transaction Detail Repoli M. BWB009, @/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Ca my: D8D OCSDGO NSOLI DATE D-I[M D 3D 00]OP-1011 3/1/2004 - 3/.31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Date Trent Settle Date PriQe cost Amount Not(lain/Lose TYPO Description Reported Date Be" Shares/Par Be" Hue Hue IT FNMA POOL40695852 5.000%05/01/2018 3/25/2004 4,691.660 1,110.76 1,110.76 0.00 DO 05/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31400SBVO 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOLN0695889 5.000%05/01/2018 3/25/2004 11,080.140 3,444.81 3,444.81 0.00 DO 05/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:314ODSC23 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA MOLOO697026 5.000%05/01/2018 3/25/2004 625.400 109.57 109.57 0.00 DO 04/01/03 311/2004 SEC ID:31400TLF2 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL00698939 6.000%09/01/2017 3/25/2004 539.270 454.96 454.96 0.00 DO 03/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31400VPY2 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA IOOLk0702210 5.D00%05/01/2018 3/25/2004 14,875.250 1.147.30 1,147.30 0.00 DD 05/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401ADP9 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA 1`00Le0702328 5.000%05/01/2018 3/25/2004 1.115.400 611.69 611.69 0.00 DD 04/Ol/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401AHD2 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL40703195 6.000%01/01/2017 3/25/2004 872.780 390.58 390.58 0.00 DO G4/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401 BGC3 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER.RMCO IT FNMA POOLs0709148 5.000%06/01/2018 3/25/20G4 1,402.840 1,237.73 1,237.73 0.00 DD 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3140114ZM7 3/25/2004 CICSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-RMCO IT FNMA IOOLs0709360 5.000%07/01/2018 3/25/2004 5,063.410 2,888A5 2,888.05 0.00 DO 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401Ja% 3/25/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8:34:17A1d PDT 45 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Bane Currency: UND ocsDLO NBOLI DATED U021 n It! n-,=,n, 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 S=ua: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date PriOe Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base IT FNMA 1`OO1,40709826 5.000%06/01/2018 3/25/2004 5.081.380 587.54 587.54 0.00 DD O6/O1103 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401JSP4 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL40709917 5.000%06/01/2018 3/25/2004 3,020.990 1,089.19 1,089.19 0.00 DD 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401JVJ4 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL40709963 5.000%06/01/2018 3/25/2004 105.470 110.26 110.26 0.00 DD 06/01/03 311/2004 SEC ID:31401JW O 3/25/2004 OCSM522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT PRIMA POOL40710235 5.000%06/01/2018 3/25/2004 18.300.120 3,266.21 3.266.21 0,00 DD 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC m:31401KBCB 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-Pa1C0 IT PRIMA POOL80713344 5.000%06/01/2018 3/25/2004 1,680,600 106.58 106.58 0.00 DD 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401 PP52 3/25/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER.RMC0 IT FNMA POOL40713365 5.000%07/01/2018 3/25/20D4 5.975.520 1,371.43 1,371.43 0.00 DD 07/01/03 3/l/2004 SEC ID:3140INQSI 3/25/2004 OCWWU2202:LONG TERM OPER-RMCO IT FNMA POOL40720319 5.000%07/01/2018 3/25/2004 54.800.430 3,944.30 3,944.30 0.00 DD 07/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401W045 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL40720369 5.000%05/01/2018 3/25/2004 35,072.740 10.065.14 10,065.14 0.00 DD O6/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401WJN0 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL40721629 5.DD0%07/01/2018 3/25/2004 3,848.960 1.291.33 1,291.33 0.00 DD 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31401EVW4 3/25/2004 OCSFU7522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 46 WqI Transaction Detail Report ID: Z"009 0 Mellon Reported by Transaction Category ease Certency: OBe OCSnCO NS OW DATE DI NF2-!.I:!!it, !I I!I tnf', 3/1/2004 . 3/31/2004 Stet=: FINAL Trade Date Tree settle Date PriCe Cost Amount Net(lain/Lose TYPO Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base IT FNMA POOLOO723487 5.000%06/01/2018 3/25/2004 967.250 1,047.04 1,047,04 0.00 DO 06/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3140 MQ4 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POO1,e0729601 5.000%07/01/2018 3/25/2004 5,235.540 1,761.34 1,761.34 0.00 DO 07/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31402HRW3 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT RNMA POOLOO732873 5A00%11/01/2018 3/25/2004 135A90 151.29 151.29 0.00 DO 10/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31402MRN5 3/25/2004 OCSP07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 1T FNMA POOL 00737130 5.000%10/01/2018 3/25/2004 14,745.290 3,103.37 3,103.37 0.00 DO 10/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31402S4P9 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOLe0738211 5.G00%10/01/2018 3/25/2004 10,572.030 2.447.99 2,447.99 0.00 DO 10/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31402 UDQ2 3/25/2004 OCSF07S22202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL#0738487 5.000%10/01/2018 3/25/2004 4,851.620 919.38 919.38 0.00 DO 10/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31402UNC2 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-MMCG IT FNMA POOL 00740471 5.000%10/01/2018 3/25/2004 3,619,600 2,895.38 2,895.38 0.00 DO 10/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31402W1740 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OFER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOLN0740748 5.000%10/01/2018 3/25/2004 3,523.890 3.433.84 3,433.84 0.G0 DO 11/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31402WSH7 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-MMCO IT FNMA POOL#0743868 5.000%11/01/2018 3/25/2004 720.550 183.57 183.57 0.00 DO 10/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:314Q3BMR 1 3/25/2009 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 47 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD OC9DL0 NSOLIDATED7"nonrIDarrnip; 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Date Trust Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Lose Type Description Reported Date Hase Shares/Par Hate Base Base IT FNMA P001,e0744008 5.000%07/01/2018 3/25/2004 5,24T670 4,762.66 4,762.66 0.00 DD 09/01/03 3/112004 SEC ID:31403BR54 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA P001,00744316 5.000%09/01/2018 3/25/2004 2,579.680 712,00 712.00 0,00 DD 09/01/03 3/112004 SEC ID:31403B3Z4 3/25/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA P001,40747914 5.000%11/01/2018 3/25/2004 1717410 1.500,24 1,500.24 0.00 DD 11/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31403F3XO 3/25/2004 OCSP07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOLN0748400 5.000%08/01/2018 3/25/2004 1,014.580 1,009.87 1,009.87 0.00 DD 09/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31403GNR9 3/25/7004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL#0748899 5.000%12/01/2018 3/25/2004 13,157.950 4,288.67 4,288.67 0,00 DD 11/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3140307LD 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA P001,e0750377 5.OD0%11/01/2018 3/25/2004 17.503.510 10,535.47 10,535.47 0.00 DD 11/01/03 3/l/2004 SEC ID:31403JUA2 3/25/2OD4 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA P001,40750380 5.OD0%11/01/2018 3/25/2004 53,508.260 8.837.56 8,837.56 0.00 DD 11/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31403JUD6 3/25/2004 OCSFW522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA P001,40750445 5.000%11/01/2018 3/25/2004 750.020 802.50 802.50 0.00 DD 11/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31403JWE2 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA P001,40751960 5.000%12/01/2018 3/25/2004 16,977.040 3,766.50 3,766.50 0.00 DD 11/01/03 3/I/2004 SEC ID:31403LMNI 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-Pa1CO 41812004 8:34:17AM FDT 48 Workbench, Transaction Detail Report m: E'WB009" ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: D8D OCSDLONSOLIDATE D'IN2 I 1013n ni n:_;i p 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tray Settle Date Price Coat Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Per Base Base Base IT FNMA POOL40753425 5.000%11/01/2018 3/25/2DG4 5,925.120 4,009.52 4,009.52 0.00 DD 11/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31403KA23 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PRACO IT FNMA POOL40755165 5.000%12/01/2018 3/25/2004 17.724.340 2.685.43 2,685.43 0.00 DD 11101/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:31403Q6A3 3/25/2004 OCSM522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT FNMA POOL40756372 5.000%11/01/2018 3/25/20D4 4,033.740 4,115.52 4,115.52 0.00 DD 11/01/03 3/1/2004 SEC ID:314038IR8 3/25/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PMCO IT GNMA POOL40596612 6.5DO%09/15/2032 3/15/2DD4 335.100 1,615.47 1,615.47 0.00 DD 09/01/02 3/1/20G4 SEC ID:36200BYN4 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PMCO IT GNMA POOL40569358 6.50D%04/15/20M 3/15/2004 56,487.940 6,022.23 6,022.23 0.00 DD 04/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:362000QK3 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PMCO IT ONMA POOL 00569685 6.500%02/15/2032 3/15/2004 1,968.620 257.80 257.80 0.00 DD 02/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3620002S2 3/15/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PMCO IT GNMA POOL 005700196.500%07/15/2032 3/15/2004 3,966.870 445.98 445.98 0.00 DD m/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3620DR048 3/15/20D4 OCW07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PMCO IT GNMA POOL 40574323 6.500%12/15/2D31 3/15/2004 40,046.680 2,573.74 2,573.74 0.00 DD 12/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36200WAY7 3/15/2DD4 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PMCO IT ONMA POOL 90575364 6.500%11/15/2031 3/15/2004 3,796.200 260.60 260.60 0,00 DO 11/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36200XFD6 3/IS/2009 OCSM522202:LONG TERM OPER-PMCO 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 49 Workbench Transaction Detail Roport ID: EWB009 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Bae9 C9 ney: USD OCSDLO NSOLIDATE DI91F21:II100i(IF1 IITI 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Statue: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Coat Amount Net Bain/Lose Type Description Reported Date Base Sharea/Per Haee Hue Hue IT GNMA POOL#05871176.500%06/15/2032 3/15/2004 603.250 107.27 107.27 0.00 DD 06/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36201 M022 3/IS/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL#0587439 6.500% 11/15/2032 3/15/2004 1,671.810 311.15 311.15 0.00 DD 12/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36201 MS45 3/IS/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOLAN21389 6.500%04/15/2026 3/15/2004 667.340 77.08 77.08 0.00 DO 04/01/96 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36206UC23 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL#0438057 6.000%05/15/2028 3/15/2004 26.640 92.90 92.90 0.00 DD 05/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36207PTN9 3/IS/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOLON49851 6.500%01/15/2028 3/15/2004 59.990 123.81 123.81 0.00 DD 01/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36208MW 3/IS/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL 404578146.000% 10/15/2028 3/15/2004 1,447.170 184.37 184.37 0.00 DO 10/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36208QSB3 3/IS/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPSR-PIMCO IT ONMA POOLN0465546 6.0009%08/15/2028 3/15/2004 845.250 2,286.75 2,286.75 0.00 DD 08/01/98 3/l/2004 SEC ID:36209AET3 3/IS/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL#0465555 6.000%09/15/2028 3/15/2004 92L450 2,462.88 2,462.88 0.00 DD 09/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36209AE48 3/IS/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL 004668456.500%06/15/2028 3/15/2004 5,450.600 339.56 339.56 0.00 DD 06/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC 1D:36209UTA6 3/IS/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 41812004 8:34:17" PDT 50 Wojkbeach„ Transaction Detail Report m: 15979009` /© Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Cerrency: UBD OCSDCO 43OMDATED➢I72-.1711 I1111111 Inn 3/1/2004 . 3/31/2004 States: FINAL Trade Date Tren Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net Gain/Lose TYPO Description Reported Date Bess Shame/Par Base Base Base IT GNMA POOLa04672796.000% 10/15/2028 3/15/2004 34.1I0 102.92 102.92 0.00 DO 10/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:362090CQ7 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOLa09672866.000% 10/15/2028 3/15/2004 553.320 1,984.87 1,984.87 0.00 DD 10/01/98 3/112004 SEC ID:36209CCX2 3/]5/2004 CCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-P1MC0 IT GNMA POOLa0468052 6.500 MI15/2028 3/15/2004 404.870 613.15 613.15 0.00 DD 07/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36209CSM4 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL 40468330 6.000%05/15/2028 3/15/2004 34.920 93.99 93.99 0.00 DD 05/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36209DHF4 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL a0469339 6.000%08/15/2028 3/15/2004 514.730 1,518.01 1.518.01 0.00 DD O8/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36209DHQ0 3/IS/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOLs046%886.000% 11/15IM28 3/15/2004 591.270 74.63 74.63 0.00 DD 11/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36209EXR8 3/15/2004 OCM07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL OD476041 6.500%06/15/2028 3/15/2004 265.220 940.88 940.88 0.00 DO 06/01/98 3/1/20G4 SEC ID:36209MZE7 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMC0 IT GNMA POOL NN786266.500%01/15/2029 3/15/2004 214.850 887.56 887.56 0.00 DD 01/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36209QV 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL 40480598 6.500% 10/15/2028 3/15/2004 167,750 665.34 665.34 0.00 DD 10/01/98 3/1/20O SEC ID:362090% 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:17" PDT 51 Workbench Transaction Detail Report m: EW6009 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Baas Carren., UBD OCSDCO NSOLIDATE D-M➢ JIJ DCJODJOD 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date Price Cost Amount Net fain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Baca IT GNMA POOL40483452 6.000% 09/15/2028 3/15/2004 19.500 65.76 65.76 0.00 DD 09/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:362D9WBV3 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOLa0485527 6.500%06/15/2031 3/15/2004 21.085.370 2,354.27 2,354.27 0.00 DD 06/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36209YLG I 3/35/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL804856106.500%07/15/2031 3/15/2004 16,063.860 2.561.00 2,561.00 0.00 DO 07/01/01 3/1/20G4 SEC ID:36209YN38 3/l5/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOLa0485682 6.500%08/15/2031 3/15/20N 4,822.040 505.14 505.14 0.00 DD OB/0l/OI 3/112004 SEC ID:36209YRB6 3/15/2004 OCSFG7522202:TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOLOO485703 6.500%08/15/2031 3/15/20N 12,242.300 460.09 460.09 0.00 DD O8/01/01 3/I/20G4 SEC ID:36209YRY6 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOL ND486720 6.000% 12/15/2028 3/15/2D04 548.560 59.65 59.65 0.00 DD 12/01/98 3/1/2004 SEC ID:362I0AVM6 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOLr0491103 6.DD0%OI/15/2029 3/15/2004 4,046.880 505.83 505.83 _ 0.00 DD 01/0l/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36210FRY4 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT GNMA POOLa0496461 6.000% O1/15/2029 3/15/2004 14,577.640 1,959.32 1,959.32 0.00 DD Ol/O1/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:362IOMQN4 3/IS/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMC0 IT GNMA POOL 40497343 6.00D%12/1SM29 3/15/2004 1.541.360 112.33 112.33 0.00 DD 12/01/98 3/I/200I SEC 0:362IONP45 3/15/2DD4 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-FIMCO 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 52 Workbench Transaction Detail Repor[ID: EWBOG9� Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Currency: USD A oL�DATE D11:2-1 "I'll nn ,1111 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Smtuo: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date PriOe Cost Amount Net (lain/Loss TYPO Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base IT ONMA POOLAG499153 6.000%02/IS/2029 3/15/2004 18.010 63.15 63.15 0,00 DD 02/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:3621000E5 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-MMCO IT ONMA POOL#0500917 6.000%04/15/2D29 3/15/2OG4 969420 32.74 32]4 0,00 DD 04/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC to:36210SPAO 3/IS/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OFER-PMCO IT ONMA POOL Y05033886.ODQ%03/15/2029 3/15/2004 17,350.120 1,541.55 I'm 1.55 0.00 DD 03/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36210VF35 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:IANO TERM OPER-PMCO IT ONMA POOL#0505636 6.00D%04/15/2029 3/15/2004 1,606.460 171.59 171.59 0.00 DD 04/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36210YY90 3/15/2004 OCSFO7522202:LONG TERM OPER-PMCO IT ONMA POOL 00512235 6.500%11/15/2029 3/15/2004 15.260 59.05 59.05 0.00 DD 11/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC N:36211 GBC6 3/15/2004 OCSM522202:LONG TERM OPER-PMCD IT ONMA POOLOD514326 6.5005607/15/2029 3/15/2OD4 277.310 767.39 767.39 0.00 DD 07/01/99 3/1/2004 SEC to:36211JLF2 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:TANG TERM OPER-PMCO IT ONMA POOL 4053WS36,500%04/15/2D31 3/15/2004 789.370 257.51 257.51 0.00 DD 04/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36212CZS3 3/IS/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PMCO IT GNMA POOL 00537885 6.500%02/15/2031 3/15/2004 146.550 567.77 567.77 0.00 DD 02/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36212MREI 3/IS/2004 OCSPW522202:LONG TERM OFER-PMCO IT GNMA POOL#05475126.500%04/15/2m1 3/15/2004 845.780 63.67 63.67 0.00 DD 04/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36212YOV9 3/IS/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PMCO 41812004 8:34:17AAi PDT 53 Workbench Transaction Detail Report m: Bp7B009 ©/ Mellon Reported by Transaction Category Base Cur ..r. USD OCSDLO NSOLIDATEDIU2J:IIIOULILEJ IFIU 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Status: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date PriQe Cost Amount Not Gain/Lose TYPO Description Reported Date Base Shares/Par Base Base Base IT ONMA POOLa0547715 6.500%02/15/2031 3/15/2004 168.600 693.36 693.36 0.00 DO 02/01/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36212YN82 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT ONMA POOL#0552322 6,500%01/15/2032 3/15/2004 3,487.770 379.09 379.09 0.00 DO 01/01/02 3/I/2004 SEC ID:362I3ESK3 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO IT ONMA POOL#05524666.500%03/15/2032 3/15/2004 46,606.500 2.846.83 2,846.83 0.00 DD 03/0l/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36213EW36 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT ONMA POOLa05526596.50D%07/15/2032 3/15/2004 14,735.670 2.193.93 2,193.93 0.00 DO 07/01/02 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36213E5U6 3/15/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT ONMA 1`001,00561017 6.500%07/15/2031 3/15/20M 37,821.440 2.152.31 2,152.31 0.00 DO 07/01/01 3/l/2004 SEC ID:36213QG29 3/15/2004 OCSF07522202:TANG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT ONMA II POOL#0080023 VAR RT 12/20/2026 3/22/2004 4,629.070 822.45 822.45 0.00 DO 12/01/96 3/I/2004 SEC ED:36225CAZ9 3/22/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT ONMA II POOL 41080088M 7.375%06/20/2027 3/22/2004 22,878.370 1,136.79 1,136.79 0.00 DD 06/01/97 3/1/20D4 SEC ID:3622SOC20 3/22/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT ONMA II POOL a0080395 VAR RT 04/20/2030 3/22/2004 7.241.370 760.59 760.59 0.00 DO 04/01/00 3/1/2004 SEC ID:36225CNM4 3/22/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT ONMA II POOL a080408X 6.5D0%05/20/2030 3/22/2004 60,539.630 6,747.01 6.747.01 0.00 DO 05/0)/00 3/1/20D4 SEC ID:36225CN28 3/22/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 54 Wq;kbench.,. Transaction Detail Report m: awsoos' /© Mellon Reported by Transaction Category B...Currency: DSD ocsDCO 4SOLIDATEDWi12.1:na nr:rinrrinn 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Status: piBAL Trade Date Than Settle Date PriOe Cost Amount Net Gain/Loss Type Description Reported Date Base Shame/Par Base Have Bass IT GENERAL ELEC CAP MTN 4TR 00545 VAR RT 3/22/2004 1,000,000.000 1,043.02 1,043.02 0.00 OS/20/2004 DD 05/20/02 3/20/2004 SEC ID:36962GYS7 3/22/2004 OCSF07511102:LIQUID OPER-PIMCO IT GENERAL MTRS ACCEP CORP SR NP 6.125% 3/1/2004 3,000,000.000 91,875.00 91,875.00 0.00 08/28/2007 DD 08/29/02 2/28/2004 SEC ID:370425SD3 3/1/2004 OCSF07622202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCG IT ONMA GTD REMIC TR 2000.9 PH VAR RT 3/16/2004 17,779.940 904,92 904.92 coo 02/16/20W 3/16/2004 SEC ID:3837H4NX9 3/16/2009 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCG IT PACIFICORP OECD MTN OR 00115 7.300% 3/1/2004 3,000,000.000 109,500.00 109,500.00 0.00 10/22/2004 DD 10/22/92 3/1/2004 SEC ID:69512EEU5 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT RESIDENTIAL ASSET 03-RSI I MIS VAR RT 3/25/2004 7,668.790 1,109.10 1,109.10 0.00 12/25/2033 DD 12/30/03 3/25/2004 . SEC ID:76098SK83 3/25/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT SBA GTD DEV PARTN 20DI.20C 16.340% 3/1/2004 236.390.200 118,035.07 118,035.07 0.00 03/01/2021 3/1/2004 SEC ID:83162CWO 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO IT UNITED AIRLS PASSTHRU OI-IC 6.831% 3/1/2004 1,600,000.000 54,648.00 54,648.00 0.00 03/01/2010 DD 08/22/01 3/1/2004 SEC ID:909317BC2 3/1/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO CD US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX NT 3.375% 3/31/2004 0.000 76,440.00 76,440.00 0.00 01/15/2007 DD 01/15197 SEC ID:9128272M3 3/31/2009 OCSF07522202:LONO TERM OPER-PIMCO CD US TREASURY INFIA71ON INDEX NP 3.625% 3/31/2004 0.000 16,050.00 16,050.00 0.00 01/15/2008 DD 01/15/98 SEC ID:912827377 3/31/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMCG 41812004 8:34:17AM PDT 55 Workbench Transaction Detail Report ID: EWB009 0 Mellon Reported by Transaction Category ease Curreney: USD OCSDLO NSOLI DATE DVU21n1 m1 1n111I-1l11j 3/1/2004 - 3/31/2004 Statue: FINAL Trade Date Tran Settle Date PriOe cost Amount Net(lain/Lose Type Description Reported Date Base Shares/pet Base Base Base CD US TREASURY INFLATION INDEX W 3.875% 3/31/2004 0.000 68,510.00 68,510.00 0.00 01/15/2009 DO 01/15/99 SEC ID:9128274YS 3/31/2009 OCW07522202:LONGTERM OPER-PIMCO IT VIRGINIA ELEC&PWR 01 SER A 5.750Yo 3/31/2004 1,750,000.000 50,312.50 50,312.50 0.00 03/31/2006 DO 03/27/O1 3/30/2004 SEC ID:927804EN0 3/31/2004 OCSF07522202:LONG TERM OPER-PIMC0 TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.B.DOLLAR 16,715,681.690 918.963.93 918,653.93 0.00 TOTAL FOD3D INCOME SECURITIES BABE: 16,715,681.690 918,553.93 918,553.93 0.00 TOTAL INTEREST BABE: 34,515,681.690 967,375.83 967,375.88 0.00 TOTAL TRABBACTIONB: 38,651,912.980 5,184,257.26 .3,249,634.83 .6,638.36 4/8/2004 8:34:17AM PDT 56 Wo�kbench� FAHR COMMITTEE Meetbg Date To ad.of Dir. 04/14/04 04/29/D4 AGENDA REPORT lFA Rumbe Ie 14(d Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator. James Matte, Safety and Health Supervisor SUBJECT: Safety Policy, Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve Revision 2 of SAFETY-POL-101, Injury and Illness Prevention Program as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5 regarding the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program. SUMMARY The District is revising its written Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy to adopt requirements of the California Labor Code regarding multi-employer worksites. These new provisions incorporate the requirements of AB 1127 (1999) and requires contractors to follow the safety and health requirements contained in District purchase orders, contracts and contract specifications. This places into policy practices already in place. The document presented for your review and adoption represents the Districts revised written Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy that conforms to Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Une item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Policy revisions required under the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration Regulations, found in Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, and California Labor Code requirements for Multi-employer worksites. These revisions add the requirement to the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program that the OCSD project manager is responsible to ensure contractors comply with their contractual requirements with respect to Cal-OSHA and District Safety and Health policies and contractual specifications. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1- Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy (SAFETY-POL-101) H beNaM^eaHwe MMbe aewb+tVaf awe/W^A+Wrouwavmm+Ncl.SOFErc-vo4+o+.mc ac�cce. arzam Page 2 r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Safety and Health Division SAFETY-POL-101 Injury and Illness Prevention Program APPROVALS Approved by: Date: General Manager Approved by: Date: Director of Human Resources Manager Approved by: Date: Human Resources/Safety Manager PROCEDURE REVISION HISTORY Rev. Date Approval 0 01/27/2002 1 09/25/2002 2 02/25/2004 This document is controlled when viewed online. When downloaded and printed, this document becomes UNCONTROLLED, and users should check the Safety and Health Division public folder to ensure that they have the latest version. Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 Contents 1. Purpose.................................................................................................4 2. Definitions ............................................................................................4 3. Requirements.......................................................................................5 3.1 Program Responsibilities.........................................................................5 3.1.1 Administration.....................................................................................6 3.1.2 Management and Supervision............................................................7 3.1.3 Employee............................................................................................7 3.2 Hazard Awareness and Analysis.............................................................8 3.2.1 Pre-Use Analysis................................................................................8 3.2.2 Comprehensive Safety and Health Surveys.......................................8 3.2.3 Periodic Self Inspections of Work Areas.............................................9 3.2.4 Routine Hazard Analysis ....................................................................9 3.2.5 Employee Reports of Hazards............................................................9 3.2.6 Incident and Accident Investigations................................................. 10 3.2.7 Pattern Analysis................................................................................ 10 3.3 Hazard Prevention and Control ............................................................. 10 3.3.1 Professional Expertise...................................................................... 11 3.3.2 Written Safety and Health Policies and Procedures......................... 11 3.3.3 Process Controls and Personal Protective Equipment..................... 11 3.3A Emergency Preparedness and Planning .......................................... 12 3.3.5 Preventative Maintenance................................................................ 12 3ASafety Training ...................................................................................... 12 3.4.1 Training Profiles................................................................................ 12 3.4.2 Employee Training............................................................................ 13 3.5 Safety Communication........................................................................... 13 3.5.1 Signage ............................................................................................ 13 3.5.2 SafetyLine......................................................................................... 13 3.5.3 Safety Awareness for Everyone (SAFE) Bulletins............................ 13 3.5A Memorandums.................................................................................. 14 3.5.5 Safety Intranet.................................................................................. 15 3.5.6 Verbal Communication ..................................................................... 15 3.5.7 Safety Committee............................................................................. 15 3.5.8 Safety Suggestion Box ..................................................................... 15 3.5.9 Rewards and Recognition Programs................................................ 15 3.5.10 Post Incident Safety Stand Down ..................................................... 15 3.5.11 Safetygram ....................................................................................... 16 3.6 Safety Policy Enforcement and Discipline ............................................. 16 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 l 3.6.1 Safety Policy Enforcement................................................................ 17 3.6.2 Discipline for Safety Policy Infractions.............................................. 17 3.7 Accident and Incident Investigations...................................................... 17 3.8 Recordkeeping ...................................................................................... 17 3.8.1 Inspection Records........................................................................... 17 3.8.2 Training Records .............................................................................. 17 3.8.3 Exposure Monitoring and Medical Records...................................... 18 3.9 Integration of Safety Compliance Initiatives........................................... 18 3.10 Coordination of Contractor Programs.................................................... 18 4. References..........................................................................................Is 5. Attachments .......................................................................................20 1. Purpose...............................................................................................23 2. Requirements.....................................................................................23 2.1 Written Compliance Programs...............................................................23 Orange County Sanitation District Number: SAFETY-POL-101Revision Number: 1 Injury and Illness Prevention Program Date: September 25, 2002 Approved by: 1 . Purpose Every California employer must establish, implement and maintain a written Injury and Illness Prevention (IIPP) Program and a copy must be maintained at each worksite. The requirements for establishing, implementing and maintaining an effective written Injury and Illness Prevention Program are contained in Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 3203 (8 CCR 3203). The purpose of this Injury and Illness Prevention Program (IIPP) is to ensure the District establishes implements and maintains a safety and health program. 2. Definitions CMMS Computerized Maintenance Management System Imminent Hazard Any condition or practice in a place of employment that constitutes a hazard which could reasonably be expected to cause death or serious physical harm immediately or before the imminence of the hazard can be eliminated through regular enforcement procedures. Injury and Illness A written program stating what the District, management and Prevention Plan employees will do with respect to safety. Manager Employee who : • manages, plans, supervises and coordinates the operations and activities of one or more major District divisions and works under general direction or administrative direction of a Department Director of the General Manager, exercising discretion in applying general goals and policy statements and in resolving organizational and service delivery problems and; • Organizes and directs the work of subordinate staff, and; • Assumes significant responsibility for a variety of personnel activities in such areas as selection, training and disciplinary actions and; • Assumes significant responsibility for the preparation and Rev.0 Date 1I27IO2 4 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 administration of the assigned budget(s) Process A series of actions or operations directed toward a result. Program The person assigned the task of maintaining and auditing the Administrator Injury and Illness Prevention Program Red Tag A red colored tag placed by an employee prohibiting the use tools or equipment because of the belief that the use of the tool or equipment will result in an accident or injury. Supervisor Employee who: • Supervises, assigns and reviews the work of subordinates in assigned sections or work units and; • Works under direction or general direction of higher level supervisory or management staff, exercising discretion in selecting appropriate resources to use in accomplishing assigned work and; • Assumes responsibility for recommending a variety of personnel actions in such areas as performance evaluation, training, selection and disciplinary measures and; • Ensures that appropriate policies and procedures are followed by subordinates and; • Monitors, coordinates and assists in developing the budget for assigned area Safety Committee A committee made up of employees representing District management and represented employees who meet to set safety goals and objectives and to solve safety related issues 3. Requirements The required elements listed below are the ten elements of the Injury and Illness Prevention Program as required by the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal- OSHA). Specific details of each element may be found in specific referenced standard operating procedures, where applicable. 3.1 Program Responsibilities This section outlines the responsibilities for the implementation and maintenance of this Injury and Illness Prevention Program. Rev.2 Date 04121/2004 5029 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 3.1.1 Administration ' 1. The Safety Division (Safety) shall be responsible for maintaining the written Injury and Illness Prevention Program. A. The Safety Supervisor shall be the IIPP Program Administrator. 2. The Executive Management team (EMT) shall ensure that the District's safety programs have sufficient resources to maintain a safe and healthful workplace. Resources include but are not limited to: A. A competent safety staff. B. An adequate budget to maintain and improve the safety and emergency response program. C. An adequate budget for required controls to minimize safety and health risks to District personnel, suppliers and the public. D. An adequate budget for required personal protective equipment as determined by Safety. E. Time for District staff to attend required safety training at a frequency and duration determined by Safety. 3. The Safety Division, in coordination with affected divisions, shall be responsible for ensuring that safety policy, safety procedures, safety programs and safe work practices are developed. 4. Safety Division personnel shall have the authority to ensure that unsafe operations are stopped and that unsafe tools and equipment are removed from service in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-101.2, Red Tag Authority or if they believe, in their professional judgment, an imminent danger exists. 5. The District's General Manager shall be responsible for ensuring District managers and supervisors comply with the provisions of this IIPP and other safety and health programs. 6. The Manager over the Safety Division shall be responsible for ensuring the IIPP and other safety and health programs Rev. 2 Date 04/21/2004 6 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL•101 1 are implemented. 7. A copy of this IIPP shall be available to all employees either in an electronic or hard copy format. 3.1.2 Management and Supervision 1. Management and supervision shall ensure employees are provided with the proper tools and personal protective equipment. 2. Management and supervision shall ensure employees follow safe work practices, including but not limited to the wearing of personal protective equipment. 3. Management and supervision shall ensure employees are appropriately disciplined for infractions of safety rules, policies, procedures and programs. 4. Management and supervision shall ensure periodic Inspections of work areas are completed and documented in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-101.1, Periodic Workplace Inspections. 5. Management and Supervision shall ensure that unsafe operations are stopped and that unsafe tools and equipment are removed from service in accordance with SAFETY- SOP-101.2, Red Tag Authority. 6. Management and supervision shall ensure identified hazards are reported, documented and corrected. 3.1.3 Employee 1. Employees shall comply with safe work practices, policies, procedures and safety programs. 2. Employees shall conduct daily inspections of their work area to check for unsafe conditions. This includes but is not limited to: A. Personal protective equipment B. Safety equipment such as fire extinguishers, safety showers and eyewashes Rev.2 Date 04/2112004 7 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 C. Tools and equipment D. Vehicles. 3. Employees shall correct unsafe conditions as soon as possible, including the replacement of personal protective equipment. 4. Employees shall report unsafe conditions that cannot be corrected to supervision immediately and submit a CMMS request. 5. Employees shall attend safety training at the scheduled time. 6. Employees escorting contractors, vendors or visitors shall ensure that the proper personal protective equipment is used at all times and all safe work practices are observed. 3.2 Hazard Awareness and Analysis The District has developed procedures for identifying and evaluating work place hazards, including scheduled periodic inspections to identify unsafe conditions and work practices. Inspection guidelines may be found in SAFETY-SOP-101.1, Periodic Workplace Inspection Procedures. 3.2.1 Pre-Use Analysis Engineering, Operation and Maintenance, Process Engineering, Facilities Maintenance, Purchasing or any other division proposing any process change that has the potential to impact the safety and health of District employees, contractors or visitors shall, in coordination with Safety, conduct a pre-use analysis to determine the impact on safety. Pre-use analysis shall be conducted in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-101.3 Pre- Use Analysis. 3.2.2 Comprehensive Safety and Health Surveys The Safety Division, in coordination with management and supervision, shall determine the scope and frequency for any comprehensive safety, health or industrial hygiene surveys. Survey scope and frequency shall be based upon: 1. Regulatory requirements. Rev. 2 Date 04/21/2004 8 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 2. Literature review for new information on recognized hazards. 3. Whenever new substances, processes, procedures, or equipment are introduced to the workplace that represent a new occupational safety and health hazard. 4. Employee input when applicable. 5. The best judgment of Safety. The frequency of inspections shall not exceed one inspection per calendar quarter. 3.2.3 Periodic Self Inspections of Work Areas 1. Division management and supervision shall be responsible for conducting periodic inspections of each work area to identify and evaluate hazards. 2. Periodic inspections shall be conducted in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-101.1, Periodic workplace Inspections. 3. Whenever new substances, processes, procedures, or equipment are introduced to the workplace that represent a new occupational safety and health hazard, supervision and/or management shall contact Safety to assist in a pre- Use Assessment in accordance with SAFETY-SOP-101.3, Pre-Use Analysis. 4. Whenever a manager/supervisor is made aware of a new or previously unrecognized hazard, Safety shall be contacted. 5. Division management and supervision shall not rely on periodic inspections performed by other divisions or committees as a substitute for required inspections. 3.2.4 Routine Hazard Analysis The Safety Division routinely conducts hazard analysis of District operations and construction activities for jobs the Safety Division deems hazardous and all confined space entries. 3.2.5 Employee Reports of Hazards Employees are encouraged to report known and potential safety and health hazards. Mechanisms for reporting these hazards Rev. 2 Date 04/21/2004 9 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 include: 1. Reports to management and supervision 2. Reports through CMMS 3. Electronic mail (e-mail) to SafetyLine or Safety staff 4. Safety Suggestion boxes 5. Safety committee meetings 6. Reports to an employee's bargaining unit representative 7. Face to face meetings with Safety staff. 3.2.6 Incident and Accident Investigations Incident and accident investigations are conducted on all incidents requiring a Property Disposition Report, all motor vehicle accidents and all Cal-OSHA recordable injuries. Other incidents may be investigated at the discretion of Safety. Accident investigations shall be conducted in accordance with SAFETY-POL-202, Accident Investigation and Reporting. Incident and accident investigations are conducted on all incidents involving $ 1,000.00 of property damage, all motor vehicle accidents and all Cal-OSHA recordable injuries. Other incidents may be investigated at the discretion of Safety. Accident investigations shall be conducted in accordance with SAFETY-POL-202, Accident Investigation and Reporting. 3.2.7 Pattern Analysis Cal-OSHA logs and accident investigations shall be periodically reviewed by Safety to determine if any accidents or near misses have similarities. 3.3 Hazard Prevention and Control Accidents are prevented through the timely recognition and correction of hazards before someone is injured or property is damaged. Rev.2 Date 0421/2004 10 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 3.3.1 Professional Expertise The District will ensure that safety and emergency response division staff is adequately trained in the hazards inherent to a wastewater treatment plant. This includes providing staff with the resources necessary to perform assigned jobs, including but not limited to the following: 1. Annual professional development 2. Certification maintenance as required by the certification authority, and as provided by district policy on certification reimbursement 3. Professional memberships 4. Reference materials, such as: A. Books B. Codes, laws, regulations and consensus standards C. Internet access in accordance with established district policy. 3.3.2 Written Safety and Health Policies and Procedures The District will develop and maintain safety policies, procedures and programs to ensure compliance with applicable Federal OSHA and Cal-OSHA requirements. Safety Policies and Procedure titles may be found in SAFETY-SOP-000.1 Control of Polices, Procedures, Programs. 3.3.3 Process Controls and Personal Protective Equipment The District shall use engineering controls to reduce employee exposures to physical and chemical hazards. Personal protective equipment shall be used when engineering controls are not feasible, have not been installed, or when emergency situations dictate such use. The District shall provide all required personal protective equipment, except as noted in SAFETY-SOP-102.8, Employee Procured Personal Protective Equipment. Rev.2 Date 04/21/2004 11 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 3.3.4 Emergency Preparedness and Planning The District has developed an Integrated Emergency Response Plan designed to prepare the District and employees for all types of emergencies, including but not limited to: 1. Medical emergencies 2. Fires 3. Earthquakes 4. Floods 5. High water flows 6. Utility outages 7. Hazardous materials spills 8. Threatened or actual terrorist activities 3.3.5 Preventative Maintenance The operations and facilities maintenance divisions have developed a preventative maintenance program to ensure critical equipment does not fail and that safety related equipment is properly maintained. The CMMS system tracks the scheduled maintenance of these items. 3.4 Safety Training Safety training is required for all District employees. New employees shall receive a New Employee Safety Orientation to familiarize them with the hazards of a wastewater treatment plant and District safety policies and procedures. Safety training is typically based on job classification, hazards that will be anticipated in a job and the employee's actual job duties. 3.4.1 Training Profiles The Safety shall meet with the manager or supervisor of each employee to determine which safety training classes shall be attended by each employee. Once a safety training profile has been developed for an employee, the training listed on the profile is mandatory. Safety and manager/supervisor shall use the following criteria to determine safety training requirements: Rev.2 Date 04/21/2004 12 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 1. Job description 2. Actual job duties 3. The anticipated job tasks of the employee 4. Anticipated future job tasks 5. Regulatory requirements 6. District requirements based on I. Previous job task requirements ii. Best industry practices. 3.4.2 Employee Training Employees shall receive safety training before they are required to perform a task and at the frequency specified in specific safety policies and procedures. 3.5 Safety Communication The District utilizes several methods to communicate safety and health requirements, safety warnings and safety tips to all employees. 3.5.1 Signage The District posts hazard-warning signs where necessary to communicate safety and health requirements, safety warnings and safety tips to all employees. Signage is posted in accordance with Title 8 CCR§3340. Accident Prevention Signs. 3.5.2 SafetyLine SafetyLine is a short tip on a variety of safety topics that affect District staff both on and off the job. SafetyLine is distributed to all District employees with e-mail accounts on payday. 3.5.3 Safety Awareness for Everyone (SAFE) Bulletins SAFE bulletins are issued on specific safety related Items explaining how something should be done, or explaining how specific components of a safety program are to be implemented. Rev. 2 Date 04/21/2004 13 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 Requirements and guidelines for developing SAFE Bulletins may be found in SAFETY-POL-103, Safety Awareness for Everyone (SAFE) Bulletins. 1. SAFE Bulletins shall be considered District policy for items not covered by specific policies. 2. A list of SAFE Bulletins may be found in SAFE Bulletin 000, List of SAFE Bulletins. 3. SAFE Bulletins shall be reviewed at least every 3 years. 4. SAFE Bulletins greater than three (3) years old shall not be considered District policy. 3.5.4 Memorandums The Safety Division will periodically issue memorandums regarding specific safety, health and hazardous waste issues. 1. Memorandums shall be limited to a single topic. 2. Memorandums may be issued for the following reasons: A. To clarify an existing policy B. To implement a new policy on an emergency basis (1) Memorandums implementing new policy requirements shall only be in force until: a. A new policy has been developed; or b. A SAFE bulletin has been developed; or c. A Ninety (90)daytime period has elapsed C. To provide information D. To offer recommendations 3. A memorandum shall not revoke or supercede an adopted policy, unless authorized by the Director of Human Resources and the General Manager by signature. 4. E-mail shall not replace a memorandum. Rev.2 Date 04121/2004 14 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 3.5.5 Safety Intranet The Safety Division maintains an intranet site where employees can go to obtain information on safety and health issues. Employees can access the Safety Intranet site by following the instructions in attachment A. 3.5.6 Verbal Communication Safety Division staff is available for contact regarding concerns over safety and health issues. 1. Verbal communication shall not be used to change District policy. 3.5.7 Safety Committee The district has agreed to form a labor-management safety committee to address work related safety concerns. In addition, subject specific safety sub committees may be formed at any time with the concurrence of the Labor-Management Safety Committee to address specific safety concerns. Safety Committees shall be governed in accordance with SAFETY- SOP-000.7, Safety Committees. 3.5.8 Safety Suggestion Box There are Safety Suggestion Boxes located around both Plant 1 and Plant 2. The purpose of the boxes is to allow employees to submit suggestions to Safety either by identifying themselves or anonymously. 3.5.9 Rewards and Recognition Programs Safety has developed a rewards and recognition program for employees who go above and beyond safe work practices and consistently display a positive safety attitude. 3.5.10 Post Incident Safety Stand Down A Safety Stand Down is a procedure in which all managerial personnel shall order a review of pertinent safety requirements for their employees. The review shall be a minimum of 30 minutes to discuss safety issues that affect their specific work group or to discuss an incident that may have occurred on a Rev. 2 Date 04/21/2004 15 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 ' District job site. The Safety Stand Down shall occur no later than the next work shift following an Incident. A Safety Stand Down shall occur when any of the following conditions occur: 1. An injury to a District employee that requires a report be made to Cal-OSHA. 2. A fatality that occurred to any persons on any District job site. 3. Any accident that results in the overnight hospitalization of 2 or more employees, District personnel or contractor personnel. 4. The District's General Manager, in consultation with the Safety and Health Division determines the need for a Safety Stand Down. A. Department and Division Managers and Supervisors may call for a Safety Stand Down at any time for their respective department and/or division. The Safety and Health Division shall be responsible for disseminating information regarding any incident requiring a Safety Stand Down and any additional information requested by management. 3.5.11 Safetygram Safetygrams are developed by the Safety and Health Division for use by management and supervision as safety tailgate meeting topics. The topics are designed to be approximately five (5) minutes in length. 3.6 Safety Policy Enforcement and Discipline All employees, including managers and supervisors, are responsible for complying with safe and healthful work practices. All employees are responsible for complying with safety rules, policies and procedures. Rev.2 Date 04/21/2004 16 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 3.6.1 Safety Policy Enforcement Each employee has a responsibility to ensure that work is performed in a safe manner. Employees shall report violations of safety rules and policies in accordance with established District procedures. 3.6.2 Discipline for Safety Policy Infractions Employees who violate safety rules, policies and procedures are subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination. Discipline shall be implemented in accordance with established District policies, and bargaining unit MOUs where appropriate. Supervision and management shall be responsible for disciplining workers for failure to comply with safe and healthful work practices. 3.7 Accident and Incident Investigations All accidents and near misses shall be investigated promptly. Accident and incident investigation shall be conducted in accordance with Safety-POL-202, Accident Investigation and Reporting. 3.8 Recordkeeping Records shall be maintained in accordance with specific Cal- OSHA requirements. Records not mentioned below are maintained in accordance with specific policies and procedures. 3.8.1 Inspection Records Records of safety inspections shall be kept 12 months after the last item found deficient has been corrected. Copies of safety inspections shall be kept in the Safety Office at Plant No. 1. 3.8.2 Training Records Employee safety training records shall be maintained in Training Server, an electronic database. These records are retained for the length of district employment, plus five (5) years. Rev.2 Date 04/21/2004 17 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 3.8.3 Exposure Monitoring and Medical Records Exposure monitoring and medical records shall be retained in accordance with SAFETY-POL-403, Access to Employee Medical Records and Title 8 California Code of Regulations, §3204. Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records. 3.9 Integration of Safety Compliance Initiatives One goal of the District's safety and health program is to ensure that safety programs are not in conflict with one another. A second goal is to ensure that the District's overall mission can be accomplished while providing a safe and healthful work environment and achieving overall compliance with all applicable regulations and laws. 3.10 Coordination of Contractor Programs The District requires all contractors that conduct business with the District to have a safety program in place and conform to District, state and federal requirements as required by approved purchase orders, contracts and specifications. Project Managers, Resident Engineers and Construction Inspectors who represent the District assigned to a project are responsible for enforcing the safety and health requirements of the contract. 4. References Title 8 California Code of Regulations, §3203. Injury and Illness Prevention Program Title 8 California Code of Regulations, §3204. Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records Title 8 California Code of Regulations, §3340. Accident Prevention Signs California Labor Code, Sections 142.3, 4558 and 6401.7 California Government Code, Section 11346. California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Division 1, Department of Industrial Relations California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4.5 Hazardous Rev.2 Date D4121/2004 18 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 Waste Management SAFETY-SOP-000.1, Control of Polices, Procedures, Programs SAFETY-SOP-000.7, Safety Committees SAFETY-SOP-101.1, Periodic Workplace Inspections SAFETY-SOP-101.2, Red Tag Authority SAFETY-POL-102, Personal Protective Equipment SAFETY-POL-103, Safety Awareness for Everyone (SAFE) Bulletins SAFETY-POL-104, Permit Required Confined Spaces SAFETY-POL-105, Hazardous Energy Control SAFETY-POL-106, Hearing Conservation SAFETY-POL-107, Hazard Communication Program SAFETY-POL-108, Contractor Safety Programs SAFETY-POL-109, Respiratory Protection Program SAFETY-POL-110, Radiation Safety Program SAFETY-POL-111, Chemical Hygiene Plan SAFETY-POL-112, Integrated Emergency Response Program SAFETY-POL-113 Exposure to Pathogens Program SAFETY-POL-114 Hazardous Waste Management SAFETY-POL-115 Backflow Prevention SAFETY-POL-201, Fire Prevention SAFETY-POL-202, Accident Investigation and Reporting SAFETY-POL-203, Ergonomics SAFETY-POL-204, Fall Protection SAFETY-POL-205, Electrical Safety SAFETY-POL-301, Vehicle Safety Operations (including carts and bicycles) Rev.2 Date 04/21/2004 19 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY•POL-101 SAFETY-POL-302, Marine Safety SAFETY-POL-303, Crane Safety SAFETY-POL-304, Forklift Operation SAFETY-POL-401, Medical Examinations SAFETY-POL-402, Workers' Compensation Benefits and Leave SAFETY-POL-403, Access to Employee's Medical Records SAFETY-POL-404, Return to Work Programs 5. Attachments Attachment A: Access to Safety Intranet Site Attachment B: District Safety and Health Programs Rev. 2 Date 04/21/2004 20 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 c Attachment A: Access to Safety Intranet Site 1. After logging into the District's computer network, open the Internet by placing the cursor over the "Internet Explorer" icon and double click with the left button on the mouse. 2-9aee The Internet Explorer has epeaed ea opens to the District's home page., type 3. the ttea. 4. Using the mouse, move the cursor over the Department's pull down menu. Select "Safety". . Double click on "Safety". 5. Select the specific topic you wish to view by placing the cursor over the topic and double clicking on the button. Rev. 2 Date 04/21/2004 21 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 Attachment B: District Safety and Health Programs Contents 1. Purpose...............................................................................................23 2. Requirements.....................................................................................23 2.1 Written Compliance Programs ........................................................................ 23 Rev.2 Dale 04/21/2004 22 of 29 1 . Purpose To promote a safe work environment for all employees and to ensure the District meets the safety-related legal requirements for written compliance programs. 2. Requirements It is the District's policy to provide a safe work environment for its employees. The District is committed to ensuring compliance with all safety-related legal requirements and providing the necessary training to meet these requirements. 2.1 Written Compliance Programs The written compliance programs, which are detailed in specific Safety Policies, Procedures or Safety Programs (SPs), covered by this policy are: 1. Injury and Illness Prevention Program This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title8, §3203, Injury and Illness Prevention Program. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL- 101, Injury and Illness Prevention Program and SAFETY- SP-101 District Safety and Health Program. The program includes information on safety commitment and responsibilities, hazard recognition, hazard assessment and control, safety communications, safety training, accident reporting and investigation, safety committees, and recordkeeping. 2. SAFETY-POL-102, Personal Protective Equipment Program This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Section (§) 3380, Personal Protective Devices. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-102 Personal Protective Equipment. This program includes the requirements for selection, use, and care for devices designed for head, eye, body, hand, and foot protection. Rev.A Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 1/30/01 23 of 29 c:\documents and settings\gray\local settings\temporary internet files\olkl3d\safety-pol-101 injury and illness prevention rev 2.doc Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 3. SAFETY-POL-103, Safety Awareness For Everyone (SAFE) Bulletins SAFE bulletins are bulletins issued on specific safety related items explaining how something should be done, or explaining how specific components of a safety program are to be implemented. SAFE Bulletins shall be considered District policy for items not covered by specific policies. SAFE Bulletins shall be reviewed at least every 3 years. SAFE Bulletins older than 3 years old shall not be considered District policy. The policy for the development of SAFE Bulletins may be found in SAFETY-POL-103, Safety Awareness for Everyone (SAFE) Bulletins 4. SAFETY-POL-104, Permit Required Confined Spaces This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, § 5157, Permit-Required Confined Spaces. To meet the intent of the regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL- 104, Permit Required Confined Spaces and SAFETY-SP- 104 Permit Required Confined Spaces. This program includes the requirements for the entrant, attendant, entry supervisor, and rescue team for confined space entry activities. 5. SAFETY-POL-105, Hazardous Energy Control This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, § 3314 Cleaning, Repairing, Servicing and Adjusting Prime Movers, Machinery and Equipment. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL- 105, Hazardous Energy Control Programs and SAFETY-SP- 105 Hazardous Energy Control. This program includes the requirements for working on or around equipment that is energized or has the potential to contain residual energy. 6. SAFETY-POL-106, Hearing Conservation This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, § 5097, Hearing Conservation. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-106, Hearing Conservation Programs and SAFETY-SP-106 Hearing Conservation. This program includes the requirements for designating areas where hearing protection is required and the selection, use, and care for hearing protection devices. Rev. 2 Date 04121/2004 24 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 7. SAFETY-POL-107, Hazard Communication Program This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Section (§) 5194, Hazard Communication. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-501, Hazard Communication. This program includes the requirements for training, use, labeling, Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) and employee training and education. 8. SAFETY-POL-108 Contractor Safety Programs This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Subchapter 4, Construction Safety Orders. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-108, Contractor Safety Programs. This program includes the requirements for Contractor oversight for safety and health related issues by the District during the completion of contracts. 9. SAFETY-POL-109, Respiratory Protection This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, § 5144, Respiratory Protection. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-109 Respiratory Protection Program. This program includes the duties of the program administrator, supervisor, and respiratory user. Also defined in the program are the requirements for the selection, inspection, use, maintenance, and storage of respiratory protection devices. 10. SAFETY-POL-110 Radiation Safety Program This program is mandated by CCR Title 17, Division 1, Chapter 5, Subchapter 4, Radiation and Cal-OSHA Title 8, § 5076, Radiation and Radioactivity, Administrative Procedures. To meet the intent of the regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-110 Radiation Safety Program. This program includes the requirements for nuclear gauge users, contractors, service representatives, and visitors who enter into restricted areas where radioactive materials are used or stored. 11. SAFETY-POL-111, Chemical Hygiene Plan This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, § 5191, Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Rev.2 Date 04/21/2004 25 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 Laboratories. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-111 Chemical Hygiene Plan and Appendix B of the Laboratory Operating Procedures Manual. This program includes the duties of the Chemical Hygiene Officer, supervisor, and laboratory employee. 10. SAFETY-POL-112, Integrated Emergency Response Program This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA CCR Title 8, § 3220 Emergency Action Plan, § 3221 Fire Prevention Plan, § Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response; CCR Title 19, § 2620 et seq. and Health and Safety Code § 25500 at seq. Minimum Standards for Business, § 2400 at seq. Standardized Emergency Management Systems; Title 22, § 66265.30 through 37, Preparedness and Prevention Plan, § 66265.50 through 56, Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures; 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 112, Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan. To meet the intent of all the regulations, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-112, Integrated Emergency Response Plan and SAFETY-SP- 112 Integrated Emergency Response Plan. This plan is divided into Volumes I and 11. Volume I, Emergency Preparedness, contains the specific plans for preparing for an emergency. Volume ll, Emergency Procedures, contains the specific plans and procedures to be implemented in response to an emergency. 13. SAFETY-POL-113, Exposure to Pathogens Program (Bloodbome Pathogens) This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Section (§) 5193, Bloodborne Pathogens for our Emergency Medical Team. Other aspects of the program are voluntary, but follow best industry practices. To meet the intent of the regulation referenced above, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-113 Exposure to Pathogens and SAFETY-SOP-113-1 Exposure Control Plan. 14. SAFETY-POL-114, Hazardous Waste Management This program is mandated by Cal-EPA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, Division 4.5 Hazardous Waste Management. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-502 Hazardous Rev.2 Date 04/21/2004 26 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 Substance Management. This program includes the requirements for identification, packaging, labeling and disposal of hazardous waste. Requirements for training employees are also included 15. SAFETY-POL-115 Backflow Prevention Program This program is mandated California Department of Health Services Regulations, found in Titles 17 and 22 of the California Code of Regulations that require specific actions and practices be performed when safeguarding potable water systems. 16. SAFETY-POL-201, Fire Prevention Programs This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Sections (§) 3220, Emergency Action Plan, 3221, Fire Prevention Plan and 6150-6184, Fire Protection. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-201 Fire Prevention. This program includes the requirements for the training of employees on evacuations, and fire systems maintenance, testing and upkeep. 15. SAFETY-POL-203, Ergonomics This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Section (§) 5110, Ergonomics. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-203 Ergonomics. This program includes the requirements for evaluation of workstations, the selection, use, and care for devices designed to reduce hazards in the work place that can lead to repetitive motion and cumulative trauma injuries. 16. SAFETY-POL-204, Fall Protection This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Chapter 4, Subchapter 4, Construction Safety Orders and Subchapter 7, General Industry Safety Orders. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-204, Fall Protection. This program includes the requirements for use of fixed, portable and personal fall protection equipment. 17. SAFETY-POL-205, Electrical Safety This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Rev.2 Date 04/21/20D4 27 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL401 Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Sections (§)2299-2974, Electrical Safety Orders. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-205 Electrical Safety. This program includes the requirements for electrical installations, work practices when working on electrical equipment and the required personal protective equipment. 18. SAFETY-POL-301, Vehicle Safety This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, as a general requirement of the District's Injury and Illness Prevention Program. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-301, Vehicle Safety. This program includes the requirements for vehicle inspection, vehicle maintenance and driver surveillance. 19. SAFETY-POL-302, Marine Safety This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, as a general requirement of the Districts Injury and Illness Prevention Program. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-302, Marine Safety. 20. SAFETY-POL-303, Crane Safety This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Chapter 4, Subchapter 7, Group 13, Cranes and Other Hoisting Equipment. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY- POL-303, Crane Safety. This program includes the requirements for training of personnel, inspection and maintenance of cranes. 21. SAFETY-POL-304, Forklift Operation This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Article 25, Industrial Trucks. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-304, Forklift Operation. This program includes the requirements for training of personnel, inspection and maintenance of forklifts. 22. SAFETY-POL-401, Medical Programs This program is mandated by several different Cal-OSHA standards in California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Chapter 4, subchapter 7, General Industry Safety Orders. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has Rev. 2 Date 04/21/2004 28 of 29 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-101 developed SAFETY-POL-401, Medical Examinations. This program includes the requirements for conducting medical surveillance on employees exposed to potentially hazardous work environments. 23. SAFETY-POL402, Workers' Compensation Benefits and Leave Program. This program is represents the District's compliance with the requirements of the California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Chapter 4.5 and 8, relating to Workers' Compensation. 24. SAFETY-POL-403, Access to Employee Medical Records This program is mandated by Cal-OSHA, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 8, Section (§) 3204, Access to Employee Medical Records. To meet the intent of this regulation, the District has developed SAFETY-POL-403, which instructs employees how to access their occupationally related medical files. 25. SAFETY-POL-404, Return to Work Programs This program is a best industry practiced designed to return injured employees back to work on restricted duty. This program results in unspecified costs savings to the District in terms of reduced workers compensation benefits, reduced disability payments and reduced costs associated with hiring temporary employees and overtime.. Rev.2 Date 0412112004 29 of 29 5 ( J FAHR COMMITTEE Mee09/19tingDa/04 09/28tE To8 ID 4ir. AGENDA REPORT Item Number Iem Number FAH umbe 1 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator: James Matte, Safety and Health Supervisor SUBJECT: SAFETY POLICY, SAFETY-POL-107, HAZARD COMMUNICATION POLICY GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve SAFETY-POL-107, Hazard Communication Policy as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5 regarding the District's Hazard Communication Program. SUMMARY The District is implementing a written policy to adopt requirements of the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements, found in Title 8, section 5194 of the California Code of Regulations. This section requires that employers maintain a written Hazard Communication Program that includes requirements for retention of material safety data sheets, container labeling and employee information and training. The document presented for your review and adoption represents the Districts written Hazard Communication Policy that conforms to the elements defined in Title 8, section 5194 of the California Code of Regulations. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Policy revisions required under the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration Regulations, found in Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations. This policy establishes the responsibilities for procuring hazardous materials as defined by the California Labor Code and disseminating the information on the hazards of chemicals to the end user. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1- Hazard Communication Policy (SAFETY-POL-107) H:bep0ag9ad,ABoa,d Agenda Repots 000 Banal Agenda RepoadA040AtIbm I4(E).SAFETY-POL107.aop RM.N &M, Page 2 V ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Safety and Health Division SAFETY-POL-107 Hazard Communication Program APPROVALS Approved by: Date: Director of Human Resources Approved by: Date: Manager,Human Resoumes Approved by: Date: Safely and Health Supervisor PROCEDURE REVISION HISTORY Rev. Date Approval 0 04/28/04 This document is controlled when viewed online. When downloaded and printed, this document becomes UNCONTROLLED, and users should check the Safety and Health public folder to ensure that they have the latest version. r Hazard Communication Program SAFETY-POL-707 Contents 1. Purpose.................................................................................................3 2. Definitions ............................................................................................3 3. Requirements.......................................................................................4 3.1 Requirements for Hazardous Materials Procurements............................4 3.2 Requirements for Hazardous Materials Container Labels .......................5 3.3 Requirements for Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)..........................5 4. Responsibilities ...................................................................................6 4.1 Safety and Health Division.......................................................................6 4.2 Employee Development Division............................................................. 7 4.3 Purchasing............................................................................................... 7 4.4 Warehouse .............................................................................................. 7 4.5 Hazardous Materials Using Divisions ......................................................7 4.6 Contractors, Consultants, Visitors and Volunteers ..................................8 5. Program Administration and Review.................................................8 6. References............................................................................................8 7. Attachments .........................................................................................9 Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date: April 28, 2004 2 of 9 Odocuments and settingstgray\local settings4emporary internet fileslolkl3d\safety-pot-107 hazard communication program.doc 4 Number: SAFETY-POL-107 Orange County Sanitation District Revision Number: 0 Hazard Communication Program Date: April 28, 2004 Approved by: Lisa Tomko 1 . Purpose The purpose of the Hazard Communication Program is to establish a program to educate employees of the hazards of chemicals used at the District and inform employees of the methods available to control these hazards. This policy applies to all District employees, volunteers and visitors. 2. Definitions Container Any bag, barrel, bottle, box, can, cylinder, drum, reaction vessel, storage tank, tank truck, or the like that contains a hazardous substance. For purposes of this section, pipes or piping systems are not considered to be containers. Designated Any individual or organization to whom an employee gives representative written authorization to exercise such employee's rights under this section. A recognized or certified collective bargaining agent shall be treated automatically as a designated representative without regard to written employee authorization. Hazardous Any material which is a physical hazard or a health hazard or is Material included in the List of Hazardous Substances prepared by the California Department of Industrial Relations Hazard warning Any words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, appearing on a label or other appropriate form of waming which convey the health hazards and physical hazards of the substance(s) in the container(s). Health hazard A substance which is statistically significant evidence based on at least one study conducted in accordance with established scientific principles that acute or chronic health effects may occur in exposed employees. The term "health hazard" includes substances which are carcinogens, toxic or highly toxic agents, Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 04/28/04 3 of 9 c:\documents and settings\gray\local settingsVemporary internet files\olkl Msafety-pol-107 hazard communication program.doc reproductive toxins, irritants, corrosives, sensitizers, hepatotoxins, nephrotoxins, neurotoxins, agents which act on the hematopoietic system, and agents which damage the lungs, skin, eyes, or mucous membranes. Label Any written, printed, or graphic material displayed on or affixed to containers of hazardous substances. Material Safety Data Written or printed material concerning a hazardous substance. Sheet (MSDS) Physical hazard A substance which is a combustible liquid, a compressed gas, explosive, flammable, an organic peroxide, an oxidizer, pyrophoric, unstable (reactive) or water-reactive material. Trade secret Any confidential formula, pattern, process, device, information, or compilation of information which gives its user an opportunity to obtain a business advantage over competitors who do not know or use it. A trade secret shall not include chemical identity Information which is readily discoverable through qualitative analysis. 3. Requirements This policy is based on a simple concept - that employees have both a need and a right to know the hazards and the identities of the chemicals they are exposed to in the workplace. Employees also need to know what protective measures are available to prevent adverse effects from occurring and where to obtain this information. By making job-specific hazard information available to employers and employees, and implementing recommended precautions for safe use, the result will be a reduction in illnesses and injuries caused by chemical exposure. Together, the District's and each employee's actions will prevent the occurrence of adverse health effects from the use of chemicals in the workplace. 3.1 Requirements for Hazardous Materials Procurements 1. Divisions requesting hazardous materials shall obtain an MSDS from the manufacturer and/or distributor prior to bringing the material onto a District facility. 2. Divisions requesting hazardous materials site shall provide the MSDS to the Safety and Health Division prior to bringing Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Dale:April 29, 2004 4 of 9 c:\documents and settingMgrayVocal settings\temporary internet files\olkl 3d\safety-pol-1 07 hazard communication program.doc 0 the material onto a District facility. 3. Divisions requesting hazardous materials shall not bring these materials onto a District facility unless the material has been approved for use by the Safety and Health Division. 3.2 Requirements for Hazardous Materials Container Labels 1. All containers of hazardous materials shall be labeled. 2. Labels shall comply with the provisions of 8 CCR 5194 Hazard Communication, subpart (f). 3. All labels shall be in English. A. Information may be printed in other languages, provided the primary label is in English. 4. District issued containers that are not the original manufacturer's container shall be labeled, tagged, or marked with the following information: A. Identity of the hazardous substance(s) contained therein; and B. Appropriate hazard warnings. 5. Manufacturer's labels shall not be removed or intentionally defaced. 3.3 Requirements for Material Safety Data Sheets (Ii 1. Each material safety data sheet shall be in English and shall contain the information required in 8 CCR section 5194, Hazard Communication, subpart g, Material Safety Data Sheets. 2. The District shall ensure that in all MSDS is provided for each hazardous substance, and is readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they are in their work area(s). 3. Material safety data sheets shall also be made readily available to, upon request, employees, their designated representatives, and Cal-OSHA. Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date:April 28,2004 5 of 9 c:\documents and settings\gray\local settings\temporary intemet files\olkl Wsafety-pol-107 hazard communication program.doc P A. NIOSH and the employee's physician shall also be given access to material safety data sheets in the same manner. 4. The District shall maintain an electronic database and hard copy of all MSDS in use at the District. A. The District shall maintain a copy of all MSDS used by District contractors. 4. Responsibilities 4.1 Safety and Health Division The Safety and Health Division shall be responsible for the following: 1. Develop a written Hazard Communication Program that will minimally include the following elements: a. A list of the hazardous substances known to be present using an identity that is referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet. b. The methods the District uses to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks, and the hazards associated with substances contained in unlabeled pipes in their work areas. c. Signage and labeling for hazardous materials. d. A method to obtain and maintain material safety data sheets so they are readily available to District employees. e. Procedures to inform contractors and service providers of the provisions of the District's written program. f. The methods the District will use to provide the other employer(s) with access to the material safety data sheet and make it available to the other employer(s)' employees. Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date:April 28,2004 6 of 9 c:Wd ments and settingslgrayVocal setfingsVemporary internet filestolkl Msafety-pol-107 hazard communication program.doc g. Include provisions to safeguard trade secrets h. Training and education. i. Program administration. 2. Initiate annual program reviews in accordance with the requirements of SAFETY-SP-107.1, Hazard Communication Program. 4.2 Employee Development Division The Employee Development Division shall be responsible for the following: 1. Schedule employee training and periodic refresher training. 2. Document employee training in the Training Records Management System database. 4.3 Purchasing The Purchasing Division shall be responsible for: 1. Selecting vendors and establishing contracts or purchase orders to procure hazardous materials. 2. Procuring only hazardous materials only for which an MSDS is on file with the Safety and Health Division Office. 4.4 Warehouse The Warehouse shall be responsible to: 1. Ensure packages of hazardous materials are labeled when received. 2. Not accept packages of hazardous materials that are damaged, leaking or unlabeled or have damaged labels. 4.5 Hazardous Materials Using Divisions 1. Ensure an approved MSDS is in the MSDS database prior to Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date:April 28,2004 7 of 9 c:\documents and settings\gray\local settings\temporary internet files\olkl3d\safety-pol-107 hazard communication program.doc r submitting a procurement request or procuring the material. a. Each using division shall ensure appropriate personal protective equipment as recommended by the MSDS is available for use by employees. 2. Ensure employees have access to MSDS during working hours. 3. Ensure employees receive training on the hazards of hazardous materials they work with or may be exposed to. 4. Conduct inspections of hazardous materials storage areas for leaking or damaged containers. a. District Project coordinators are responsible for ensuring hazardous materials storage areas are conducted for projects they are coordinating and/or overseeing. 4.6 Contractors, Consultants, Visitors and Volunteers Contractors, consultants, visitors and volunteers shall not bring hazardous materials onto any District facility unless an MSDS has been provided to the Safety and Health Division Office. 5. Program Administration and Review The Hazard Communication Program shall be managed and administered by the Safety and Health Division. This Hazard Communication Program shall be evaluated annually to ensure that it is effective. Program reviews shall occur in November of each calendar year. 6. References Title 8, California Code of Regulations, Section 5194, Hazard Communication SAFETY-POL-101 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-SP-107.1 Hazard Communication Program Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date:April 28,2004 8 of 9 c:\documents and settings\grayllocal settings\temporary internet files\olkl3d\.safety-pol-107 hazard communication program.doc 7. Attachments None Rev.0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date:April 28,2004 9 of 9 c:\documents and settings\gray\local settings\temporary internet fles\olkl 3d\safety-pol-107 hazard communication program.doc i I FAHR COMMITTEE Meetin9Dete To se.of Do-. 04/14/04 04/28/04 AGENDA REPORT Rem Number Item Number FAHR04-29 We7 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator: James Matte, Safety and Health Supervisor SUBJECT: SAFETY POLICY, SAFETY-POL-108, CONTRACTOR SAFETY POLICY GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve SAFETY-POL-108, Contractor Safety Policy as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5 regarding the District's Contractor Safety Program. SUMMARY The District is implementing a written policy to adopt best management practices to ensure contractors working on District projects maintain a safe and healthful workplace as required by the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration. This policy will also reduce risk to the District from Cal-OSHA liability with regards to multi- employer worksites. The document presented for your review and adoption represents the Districts written Contractor Safety Policy. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION New policy required under the Cafrfomia Occupational Safety and Health Administration Regulations, found in Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations and the California Labor Code. This policy requires the District to collect and evaluate information about a contractor's safety and health history to ensure they provide their employees with a safe and healthful workplace by showing compliance with Cal-OSHA and California Labor Code requirements. Contractors who fail to meet established criteria will be prohibited from ' working on District construction projects for a period not to exceed 1 year. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1- Contractor Safety Policy (SAFETY-POL-108) MVe>fa9e^EUHWO F9enaa FeWM1SSMi Baae AnenN PpORww'llem ui el. 14 1V L-1.ea Page 2 f ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Safety and Health Division SAFETY-POL- 108 Contractor Safety Program APPROVALS Approved by: Date: Director of Human Resources Approved by: Date: Manager,Human Resources Approved by: Date: Safety and Health Supervisor PROCEDURE REVISION HISTORY Rev. Date Approval p 3/24/04 L. Tomko This document is controlled when viewed online. When downloaded and printed, this document becomes UNCONTROLLED, and users should check the Safety and Health public folder to ensure that they have the latest version. 5 Contractor Safety Program SAFETY-POL-108 v Contents 1. Purpose.................................................................................................3 2. Definitions ............................................................................................3 3. Requirements.......................................................................................4 3.1 Safety and Health Division.......................................................................4 3.2 On-Site Activity Representative...............................................................4 3.3 Procurement Organizations..................................................................... 7 4. Program Administration and Evaluation ...........................................8 5. References............................................................................................8 6. Attachments .........................................................................................8 Rev. 0 Date:April 28, 2004 2 of 8 Orange County Sanitation District Number: SAFETY-POL-108Revision Number: 0 Contractor Safety Program Date: April 28, 2004 Approved by: Lisa Tomko 1 . Purpose The purpose of this policy is to establish safety and health requirements for contractors to follow while performing work on District contracts. 2. Definitions Cal-OSHA The California Occupational Safety and Health Administration Competent A person who is capable of identifying existing and predictable Person hazards in the surroundings or working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous to employees, and who has authorization to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate such hazards. Construction The planned trenching, renovation, addition, repair alteration, painting, new construction, maintenance, removal, or wrecking of any fixed structure or its parts. Contract A verbal or written agreement or purchase order between the District and a Contractor. Contractor Any non-District person on a District site for business purposes or acting on the District's behalf Imminent Hazard A substantial probability that death or serious physical harm (danger) could result On-site Activity The District employee who has been designated to oversee and Representative monitor the Contractor activities for the Responsible Division. Examples may include, but are not be limited to the following: Project Manager, Resident Engineer, Construction Inspector, Engineering Division Manager, Lead Facilities Worker. Responsible The District division that is the requester of services. Division Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 4I28/04 3 of 8 o:\documents and settings\gray\local settingsUemporary Internet files\olkl Msafety-pol-l08 contractor safety program.doc Contractor Safety Program SAFETY-POL-108 Shall A mandatory requirement Should A recommended requirement Title 8 CCR Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations 3. Requirements 3.1 Safety and Health Division 1. Develop and implement documented programs and procedures for contractors to follow during the execution of a contract. 2. The documented programs and procedures for contractors shall contain the following elements: A. Qualification of contractors and proposed sub contractors. B. Requirements for compliance with applicable regulatory requirements if not addressed in specific program areas. C. Job Site Safety Analysis (JSSA). D. Job Hazard Analysis (JHA). E. Hot Work Permit Program. F. Hazardous Energy Control Program coordination. (1) Including hazardous energy control procedures G. Confined Space Entry Procedure review and coordination. H. A review of contractor identified Site Safety Precautions. I. A review of contractor's Training/Qualification Documentation as required by Cal-OSHA. Rev. 0 Date:April 28, 2004 4 of 8 contractor Safety Program SAFETY-POL-108 J. Review/Approval of contractor safety and health programs. K. Coordination of concurrent work with District employees. L. Prohibition of use of District equipment unless authorized by the Director of Engineering or the Director of Operations and Maintenance and the Controller (Risk Management) and the Safety and Health Supervisor(or designee). M. OCSD Engineering and Purchasing specification changes and reviews for safety and health items. 3. Conduct periodic audits of operations that expose District personnel to hazardous situations and increase the risk of regulatory enforcement actions against the District due to work performed by a contractor. 4. Exercise authority to cause the immediate cessation of operations in any situation presenting imminent jeopardy to the safety and health of any personnel or loss of property 5. Identify and communicate to the On-site Activity Representative any safety or health risks and appropriate control measures. 3.2 On-Site Activity Representative 1. Prior to the bidding process, review the project scope and schedule as it affects site safety or health issues. A. Discussions shall include Safety and Health, Operations, Maintenance, Collections or any other affected organizations. 2. Ensure that the Contractor has met with Safety and Health prior to the start of work. A. The Job Site Safety Analysis shall be completed before the start of work. 3. Inform the Contractor of changes to District policy or State and Local regulations that may affect safety compliance on Rev.0 Date:April 28,2004 5 of 8 Contractor Safety Program SAFETY-POL-108 the job site. 4. Bring safety and health observations to the attention of the Contractor. 5. Suspend Contractor activities that pose a safety, health or environmental risk to people or the job site. A. This includes : (1) Activities observed. (2) Activities brought to the representative's attention by other District employees. (3) Activities brought to the representative's attention by the general public. (4) Activities brought to the representative's attention by Safety and Health (5) Activities brought to the representative's attention by other contractors (6) Activities brought to the representative's attention by regulatory personnel. 6. Discipline any Contractor for repeated disregard of District safety and health policies or State and Local regulations. Discipline may include: A. Removal of specific individuals from the job site. (1) Removal may be temporary or permanent (2) Repeated disregard of safety rules shall require permanent removal. B. Removal of specific equipment or materials from the job site. C. Work stoppage until unsafe conditions are corrected. D. Work stoppage until appropriate personal protective equipment, tools, equipment, etc. are provided to employees. E. Work stoppage until the Contractor documents proper Rev. 0 Date:April 28, 2004 6 of 8 Contractor Safety Program SAFETY-POL-108 training and certification to perform a task as required by District policy or State and Local regulations. F. Termination or the Contractor's contract. 7. Resolve issues involving the Contractor's safety performance. 8. Ensure that site control is maintained. This includes: A. The establishment of appropriate traffic control measures. (1) For motor vehicles. (2) For bicycles (3) For pedestrians (4) Other means of transportation B. The assignment of personnel to oversee traffic control as necessary to ensure safety. 9. Shall ensure that all accidents or incidents involving Contractor personnel are reported to Safety and Health within 8 hours of the incident. 3.3 Procurement Organizations 1. Incorporate safety and health clauses in the contract documents. A. Adherence to applicable Cal-OSHA requirements B. Adherence to applicable Federal OSHA requirements C. Adherence to applicable California and Federal environmental requirements. D. Adherence to applicable Local ordinances E. Adherence to applicable District policies and procedures as specified in SAFETY-SP-108.1 and SAFETY-SP-108.2. 2. Request and forward the Contractor's safety performance Rev.0 Date:April 28,2004 7 of 8 i Contractor Safety Program SAFETY-POL-108 I history to the Safety and Health for review and evaluation. 4. Program Administration and Evaluation The Construction Safety Program shall be managed and administered by the Safety and Health Division. Construction Safety Program shall be evaluated annually by the Construction Safety and Health Sub Committee to ensure that it is in compliance with State and Federal laws and regulations. 5. References Title 8, California Code of Regulations, Subchapter 4. Construction Safety Orders SAFETY-POL-101 Injury and Illness Prevention Program SAFETY-SP-108.1 Contractor Qualification Program SAFETY-SP-108.2 Requirements for Contractor Safety Programs 6. Attachments None Rev. 0 Date:April 28, 2004 8 of 8 FAHR COMMITTEE Meenng Dare To ad.or IN, 04/14/04 04/2B/04 AGENDA REPORT Ron Number Item Number FAHR04-30 14(n Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator. James Matte, Safety and Health Supervisor SUBJECT: SAFETY POLICY, SAFETY-POL-115, BACKFLOW PREVENTION POLICY GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve SAFETY-POL-115, Backflow Prevention Program, Revision 1 as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5 regarding the District's Backflow Prevention Program. SUMMARY The District is revising the written policy that adopted requirements of the California Department of Health Services Regulations, found in Titles 17 and 22 of the California Code of Regulations that require specific actions and practices be performed when safeguarding potable water systems. These revisions are to definitions to standardize new language adopted in the above referenced regulations. The document presented for your review and adoption represents the Districts written Backflow Prevention Policy that conforms to the elements defined in the California Department of Health Services, Titles 17 and 22 of the California Code of Regulations. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY N/A BUDGET IMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Revisions to definitions in policy to conform to revised definitions found in the California Department of Health Services Regulations, Titles 17 and 22 of the California Code of Regulations. The definitions in the document passed by the Board in February 2004 were revised in Department of Health Services Regulations, Titles 17 and 22 of the California Code of Regulations the February 2004. The new definitions are effective May 1, 2004. ALTERNATIVES N/A CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1- Backflow Prevention Policy (SAFETY-POL-115, Rev 1) H Wee padaeBoa,d Agenda Raao 004 Bmm Agenda fiep OaXANuam 14(0.S1 -FOW ss.dW ReNeed:W0101 Page 2 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Safety and Health Division SAFETY-POL- 115 Backflow Prevention Program APPROVALS Approved by: Date: Director of Human Resources Approved by: Date: Manager,Human Resources Approved by: Date: Safety and Health Supervisor PROCEDURE REVISION HISTORY Rev. Date Approval 0 2128l04 L.Tomko 1 4128104 L.Tomko This document is controlled when viewed online. When downloaded and printed, this document becomes UNCONTROLLED, and users should check the Safety and Health public folder to ensure that they have the latest version. Backflo Prevention Progmm SAFETY-POL-115 Contents 1. Purpose.................................................................................................3 2. Definitions ............................................................................................3 3. General..................................................................................................4 4. Instructions-New Construction...........................................................4 5. Training and Communication .............................................................6 6. Recordkeeping.....................................................................................6 7. Program Administration and Evaluation ...........................................7 B. References............................................................................................7 9. Attachments .........................................................................................7 Rev. 0 Date:April 28,2004 2 of 7 Number: SAFETY-POL-115 "q Orange County Sanitation District Revision Number: 0 Backflow Prevention Program Date: April 28, 2004 Approved by: Lisa Tomko 1 . Purpose This policy has been developed to protect the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) water distribution system from contamination and/or pollution resulting from the backflow, back- siphonage or cross connection into a potable water service connection(s). The OCSD shall develop and implement a backflow, prevention and cross connection program that complies with state and local regulations. This policy applies to all designs, installations, maintenance or testing function related to an OCSD water distribution system. This policy shall also act as the mechanism for compliance with existing OCSD specifications, policies and procedures while protecting employee and public health. 2. Definitions Air Gap A physical separation between the free flowing discharge end of Separation (AG) a potable water supply pipeline and an open or non-pressure receiving vessel. An "approved air gap" shall be at least double the diameter of the supply pipe measured vertically above the over flow rim of the vessel- in no case less than 1 inch (2.54 cm). Auxiliary Water Any water supply on or available to the premises other than the Supply approved water supply. This shall include used water; water which has passed through the water meter, polluted or contaminated, or they may be objectionable and constitute an unacceptable water source. AWWA Standard An official standard developed and approved by the American Water Works Association. Backflow A flow condition, caused by a differential in pressure that causes the flow of unapproved water or other contaminants into the potable supply source. Backsiphonage Backflow caused by negative or reduced pressure in the supply piping. Rev. 0 Date 4I28I04 3 of 7 Backflow Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-115 f Backpressure Backflow caused by positive or higher pressure in the user's system. Carrying Water Potable water that is used to dilute and/or assist in the delivery of another substance (usually a chemical product) to a pre- determined discharge point Cross Connection An unprotected actual or potential connection between a potable water system used to supply water for drinking purposes and any source or system containing unapproved water or a substance that is not or cannot be approved as safe, wholesome and potable. By-pass arrangements,jumper connections, removable sections, swivel or changeover devices or other devices through which backflow could occur, shall be considered cross-connections. Cross- A person certified by the California-Nevada Section of the Connection American Water Works Association, per Title 17&22, and shall Control maintain a valid Plumbing Inspector Certification issued by the Specialist (Water International Conference of Building Officials and International Resources Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, per Uniform Specialist) Plumbing Code 2000, and shall maintain a valid Cross- Connection Tester Certification issued by the Orange County Health Department Double Check An assembly of at least two independently acting check valves Valve including tightly closing shut-off valves on each side of the check valve assembly and test cocks available for testing the water tightness of each check valve. Fire Protection A domestic potable water supply protected by a double check Water detector assembly that is used for internal fire suppression. This includes standpipes and hydrants. Industrial Water Potable water that is protected by a backflow device. Plant Water Unfiltered, secondary effluent that is not for general public use. Includes seal water and wash down water Potable Water Water provided by a water purveyor Recycled Water A wastewater which as a result of treatment is suitable for uses other than potable use. Reduced Pressure A backflow preventer incorporating not less than two check Principle valves, an automatically operated differential relief valve located between the two check valves, a tightly closing shut-off on each side of the check valve assembly, and is equipped Rev. 0 Date:April 28, 2004 4 of 7 ' Back low Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-115 with the necessary test cocks for testing. User Connection The point of connection of a users piping to the water supplier's facilities. Water Purveyor The person or entity that owns or operates a water system. Water User Any person or entity obtaining water from a public water supply. 3. General The OCSD shall install, operate, maintain and protect our water systems by controlling actual or potential cross-connections via: 1. Promoting elimination of existing or future cross- connections through scheduled inspections and regulation of water system construction and operation within OCSD facilities. 2. Properly installing and maintaining backflow preventers where actual or potential cross-connections exist to prevent backflow or back siphonage of contaminants or pollutants into OCSD water systems. 3. All installations shall comply with regulatory requirements and shall be commensurate with the degree of hazard that exists. 4. Instructions-New Construction 1. Backflow prevention shall be installed in accordance with OCSD Specification, Sections 15100 and 15115. 2. The specifications shall include but not be limited to the following elements: A. Submittal of the job-specific backflow prevention devices. B. Submittal of the backflow preventer testing documentation. C. Identification of locations where the contractor's work will require use of a backflow preventer (specify type). Rev. 0 Date:April 28,2004 5 of 7 Backflow Prevention Program SAFETY-POL-115 3. The Construction Inspector is responsible to ensure that backflow prevention devices are tested by an independent third party and copies of the test results are forwarded to the CMMS Group for inclusion into that system. 5. Training and Communication A training program to educate applicable OCSD staff on: 1. The requirements of this policy, 2. The operating procedures by which it is implemented and 3. Job-specific role(s)/responsibility(ies). 6. Recordkeeping 1. A database within the Computer Maintenance Management System (CMMS) to properly inventory and maintain existing backflow preventers. 2. The database shall include "at will" backflow preventers, used on an as needed basis, and those currently in service on OCSD property. 3. This database should include but not be limited to the following elements: A. The name of the device, B. Manufacturer, C. Serial Number (manufacturer), D. Loop Tag Number(OCSD), E. Location (if in service), F. Date of purchase, G. Date of manufacture, H. Most recent certification test data, I. Date of the next scheduled or required certification test 4. A list of approved backflow prevention assemblies which will Rev. 0 Date:April 28, 2004 6 of 7 Backflow Prevention Program SAFETY-POL.115 be made available to OCSD employees and the public by written or electronic request. 7. Program Administration and Evaluation The Backfow Prevention Program shall be managed and administered by the Mechanical Maintenance Division. 8. References SAFETY-POL-101 Injury and Illness Prevention Program OCSD Engineering Specifications, Sections 15100 and 15115 OCSD Engineering Guidelines, Chapters 2 and 6 OCSD Instrument and Equipment Tagging Procedure California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Chapter 5 California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4 American Water Works Association, Standard C506 Water Recycling 2030: Recommendations of California's Recycled Water Task Force, California Department of Water Resources, June 2003 Approved Backflow Prevention Assemblies for Service Isolation, California Department of Health Services, August 2002 California Health Laws Related to Recycled Water, 'The Purple Book". Most Recent Edition. California Department of Health Services, Recycled Water Unit. 9. Attachments None Rev. 0 Date: April 28, 2004 7 of 7 FAHR COMMITTEE I4eeengDWe To ad.ofW. 04/14/04 04/28/D4 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHR04-31 14fal Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: DEDICATING REVENUES FOR PAYMENT OF DEBT OBLIGATIONS GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Recommend to the Board of Directors the approval of Resolution Number OCSD 04-09, dedicating revenues for the payment of debt obligations in order to reaffirm and to clarify the Board's prior actions in 1992 and 1998. SUMMARY In 1992 the Board first adopted a policy declaring the District's intent to use ad valorem property tax revenues first for repayment of debt obligations, including interest. While it was clearly the intent of staff when the resolution was adopted to include not only the then-existing "debt" but future borrowing as well, the language is not specific. The policy has been included in the documentation enabling subsequent Certificates of Participation, but staff and General Counsel believe it is appropriate to adopt a new resolution that cannot be misunderstood. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS • Resolutions Nos. 92-47-1 et seq. • Resolution OCSD No. 98-26 • COP documentation for Series 2000 and Series 2003 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY There are no costs associated with this policy. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION None x bal4aYe^da,B Aw Reoe�a and Memo n.w•meww•,a9Wr ry oed.eeo�doc •....d:dwam3 Page 1 ALTERNATIVES Do not adopt the proposed Resolution. CEGA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. OCSD 04-09 NVe�alftW Agerga qep.�3 8ald Are Repr6 WM 14191.Pro Tay CaEi[apM � Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 04-09 DEDICATING REVENUES FOR THE PAYMENT OF DEBT OBLIGATIONS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, DEDICATING ITS REVENUES FOR PAYMENT OF DEBT OBLIGATIONS WHEREAS, District is a County Sanitation District organized and existing pursuant to the provisions of the County Sanitation District Act, California Health& Safety Code Sections 4700 at seq.; and WHEREAS, District obtains revenues to meet its obligations for providing wastewater, collection, treatment and disposal facilities and services to the residents and businesses in twenty-four Cities and the unincorporated areas of Orange County; and WHEREAS,the most reliable sources of revenues are the ad valorem property taxes and annual sewer service charges; and WHEREAS, said revenues are required in order to provide construction and rehabilitation of capital facilities, and to operate and maintain all of its collection, treatment and disposal facilities; and WHEREAS, said revenues are obtained from various sources, including ad valorem property taxes, sanitary sewer service charges and earned interest on investments; and WHEREAS,the District, in order to fulfill the capital facilities requirements of its 30-year Master Plan, issued Refunding Certificates of Participation for financing said requirements in the years 1992, 1993 and 2000, and issued additional Certificates of Participation in August 2003, and will do so again in 2005 and subsequent years, to assist in paying the cost of the acquisition and construction of additional District facilities; and WHEREAS, the loss or reduction of ad valorem property tax revenues could result in a significant adverse impact on the District's ability to meet its obligations under the terms of such financing documents; and WHEREAS, Districts, in the course of the issuance of its Certificates of Participation financing, has received very favorable credit ratings based upon its financial stability and the reliability of its sources of revenues,thus resulting in more favorable interest rates on the obligations and a lower net cost to the taxpayers and ratepayers; and WHEREAS,future financing obligations will be most cost effective If the District again receives favorable credit ratings and is able to sell its obligations at the lowest possible interest rates; and 1 WHEREAS, the District has determined that (a)a dedication of its revenues, and in particular its ad valorem taxes,towards the payment of its obligations under long-tenn financing, past and future, will benefit the taxpayers and ratepayers of the District in that it provides greater assurance of the payment of its debt obligations; and(b) dedicated reliable revenue sources and the related higher credit ratings are of considerable importance to investors purchasing the long-term financing obligations of the District, as is evidenced by the successful prior financing issues which were able to rely upon both the ad valorem tax revenues and the annual sewer service charges; and WHEREAS, the District has previously adopted Resolutions Nos. 92-47-1 at seq. and Resolution No. OCSD 98-26 dedicating revenue for the payment of its debt obligations; and WHEREAS, District wishes to reaffirm the policy of its Predecessor Districts and this consolidated District, of dedicating its revenue sources for payment of its debt obligations. NOW, THEREFORE,the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: To assure the continued financial viability of this District, District hereby dedicates its revenues, in the following order of priority: First: Its ad valorem property tax revenues; Second: Its sanitary sewer service charges; and Third: All other revenues, to meet its on-going debt obligations pursuant to the Master Agreement for District obligations dated as of August 1, 2000, and Refunding Certificates of Participation 1992 Series; Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series; and Refunding Certificates of Participation 2000 Series; and Certificates of Participation dated August 2003, and any future obligations issued pursuant to the Master Agreements of August 1, 2000, and any future agreement or agreements for the acquisition, construction, maintenance, or operation of the sewers, and works of other facilities designated by the District as receiving the benefit of this dedication. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting held April 28, 2004. Chair ATTEST: Board Secretary 2 FAHR COMMITTEE Me n Date To9d.oi Dir. 9/19/D9 912R/04 AGENDA REPORT Item Number aen Number _ FAHR0/-32 19 h Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator. Michael D. White, Controller SUBJECT: DEFERRED PAYMENT AGREEMENTS FOR CHARGES AND FEES OWED BY THREE INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITTEES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve three deferred payment agreements negotiated by the General Manager for the collection of all charges and fees owed for sanitary sewer service charges and industrial discharge permit fees, plus interest of 7% per annum, with Dae Shin USA, Inc., Expo Dyeing & Finishing, Inc., and Y2K Textile, Inc. SUMMARY Dee Shin USA, Inc., Expo Dyeing & Finishing, Inc., and Y2K Textile, Inc. are holders of industrial wastewater discharge permits issued by the District that require the payment of sanitary sewer service charges and industrial discharge permit fees for the cost of conveying, treating and disposing of wastewater discharged. Based on the terms of the permits, these permittees are required to pay estimated quarterly sewer service charges that are reconciled annually with actual discharge flows and levels of biochemical oxygen demand and total suspended solids. All three permittees are now in default of their payment obligations and the General Manager, in accordance with Resolution No. OCSD 98-23, Article III, "Collection of Fees and Charges Relating to Industrial Waste Dischargers", has negotiated deferred payment agreements with these three permittees requiring monthly payment terms plus interest of 7% per annum. The table below shows the first date of delinquency (when amount owed was not paid in full), the number of months negotiated for repayment, the total amount owed as Of April 1, 2004, and the total amount of principal and interest to be collected for each permittee: Date of Repayment Owed as of Aggregate Permltee Delinquency Period April 1 2004 Amount Owed Dae Shin USA 9/30/03 12 months $266,711.70 $276,932.35 Expo Dyeing 9/30/02 18 months $168,916.89 $178,431.94 Y2K Textile 9/30/03 24 months $203,013.54 $218,146.55 Should any of the permittees default on their agreements, the District has the right to revoke the permit and perfect liens and other security interests as deemed appropriate as security for the outstanding obligation. Revoking the discharge permit would make it impossible for one of these companies to continue their primary operations. M WepM daa dApa PePa Wa Mao Ageroa Fepo„aneav,rm 1Mh). xe"n Pg apmmrn W ae";ad oe W Pagel PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS None. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Not applicable BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item) ATTACHMENTS N/A x w.pra a'ea Agenda AQWo z ew,a A,Wa RWft`Wa 14Ih1,�Pg AQm Ma ae,,a �� Page 2 FAHR COMMITTEE m dng Dar To W.or OR. 04/19/04 N12SIN AGENDA REPORT ran rvumeer Item rvumber FPHR09-39 19fe Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Blake P.Anderson, General Manager SUBJECT: NON-BASE BUILDING PAYMENT GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Approve a one time only non-base building payment for the Secretary to the General Manager in an amount not to exceed$1,200. SUMMARY The Secretary to the Board of Directors began a leave of absence on February 23, 2004. The leave of absence Is expected to end on April 19, 2004 for a total of eight work weeks or 320 hours. During this time period,the Secretary to the General Manager has assumed many of the critical duties of the Secretary to the Board of Directors. These duties include; overseeing the compilation and mailing of board agendas, taking board meeting minutes and giving work direction to the Administrative Services Division. Employees who are assigned by District management to perform the duties of an open, budgeted position at a higher level are eligible for a one step increase per Human Resources Policy C190.00. Since the Secretary to the Board of Directors position is not an open position,any employee assuming her duties would not be eligible for acting pay. As a confidential employee,the Secretary to the General Manager will be eligible for a step increase based on"average"performance for FY03/04. Awarding the Incumbent a one time only non-base building payment will reward the employee for assuming the additional duties of the higher level classification. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS N/A PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY Applying the one step acting pay increase concept to this particular case results In a $1.50 per hour difference between the Incumbent's current rate of pay and a one step increase. The actual non-base building payment will be based on this$1.50 differential and the actual number of hours that the employee assumes the higher level duties. The wwe.wa»bw...a.woweaow me.ey.w.n.�,owwv.munrx«'m,.muy ro,...a: a.ww.�Mu Page 1 anticipated hours are 320 but depending on the actual return to work date,this amount could increase to 800 hours (February 23rd through the end of FY03/04) resulting in the maximum non-base building payment of$1,200. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable(information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION N/A ALTERNATIVES Do not approve the recommended non-base building payment. CEOA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS N/A Page FAHR COMMITTEE Meetlng Date T084 i8 Dlr. 04-14-09 69-28-04 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number FAHRD4-36 14(i) Orange County Sanitation District FROM: Blake Anderson, General Manager Originator: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance SUBJECT: 2004-05 SEWER SERVICE USER FEE ESTIMATES FAHR COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION 1) That the Board of Directors authorize and implement the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for Fiscal Year 2004-05, adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD 20 in July 2003, that are subject to annual reaffirmation by a two-thirds vote. Or 2) That the Board of Directors authorize and implement the Sanitary Sewer Service Charges for Fiscal Years 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08, adopted by Ordinance No. OCSD 20 in July 2003, that are subject to annual reaffirmation by a two-thirds vote, and to repeal the requirement of reaffirmation in future years. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Recommend to the Board of Directors to authorize and implement the sanitary sewer service user fee schedule for the fiscal years of 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08, that was adopted last year subject to annual approval by 2/3 vote. SUMMARY Historically, the District has increased our overall sewer user fees in fairly small annual increments, using some debt financing to smooth the impact of the capital improvement program. With the public interest in improved effluent quality and the Board's decision to meet secondary treatment discharge standards rapidly, it became necessary last year to propose to increase the rates on the front-end of the capital improvement program in order to match the program itself and to reduce the long-term rate impacts of additional future debt financing. The Directors adopted a plan in 2003 that included debt financing for$1.4 billion of the $2.4 billion capital improvement program. By authorizing this amount of borrowing, the Directors were able to limit annual sewer user fee increases to 15%each year through 2007-08. The Board agreed with this plan and asked that the proposed fee increases be considered annually by the Board for implementation. 2004-05 will be the second year of this plan. A few things have changed since the adoption of the plan and of the 2003-04 budgets. We successfully issued $280 million of fixed-rate Certificates of Participation; so the annual debt service on 20%of the proposed new borrowing is known. We have w embarked on the Validated Capital Improvement Program using the contract management services of IPMC. We have re-evaluated every project in the Validated Capital Improvement Program and many newly proposed projects as a part of the 2004-05 budget preparation process. At this point of the current year, the capital improvement program projections indicate that approximately $50 million of budgeted construction costs will be deferred to a future year. We have reached an agreement with the Orange County PFRD that they will be responsible for the protection of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, so we can remove $54 million of that project from our future budgets. The Board recently adopted increased Capital Facilities Capacity Charges which will increase connection fee revenues over the planning period. All of these changes and a few others combine to make it possible to continue within the adopted sewer user fee program which includes a$15 increase for 2004-05. If the Directors authorize the implementation of the approximate 15% annual adjustments for 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08, these increases will be sufficient for those years as well. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY The 5-year sewer service user fee schedule for a single family residence is: 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 $100.00 $115.00 $132.00 $153.00 $175.00 The rate for 2003.04 was implemented and will be the rate for 2004-05 without a Board action. The rate for 2004-05 is proposed for consideration. The rates for 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08 are projected and can be approved by the Board without another direct mail notification to the service area property owners and without another Ordinance process. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ® Not applicable (information item). Applies to future budget periods ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The attached cash flow includes all of the changes that were mentioned above. The 2003-04 projections differ from the adopted budget to reflect our current information. Line 19 shows the estimated annual single-family residential user fee that will be needed to complete the Validated Capital Improvement Program and to meet COP service and operational & maintenance needs through 2020. X:WeplNOanda,Baa,d Al..aa Rewk'2 a 1a Agenda amau.ft.1ftI sa-+servVsarFeew,es.eoc wNYd. o Page 2 Y Line 4 shows the new borrowing that was projected during the rate adoption process in 2003. The total new borrowing has not changed, but some has been moved to later years to reflect the deferred capital projects. Line 17 shows the estimated total end-of-the-year accumulated funds, sometimes called reserves. These balances should be compared to Lines 24 through 32 which show the components of the Board-adopted policy that the FAHR Committee reviewed last year. Special notice should be made of the amounts on Line 29; the Required Debt Service Reserves are maintained by Trustee Banks and are not available to the District. ALTERNATIVES None presented at this time. CEQA FINDINGS N/A ATTACHMENTS 1. Consolidated Cash Flow Projections GGS N:`a.�.e«a.�a Meme nepoM2UJ^eaue Msma newbnwewm+a y�.s.x.rs.n,ner«nn«a: qa,;,,, Page 3 4 MON 4:52!!. v •. Orange County Sanitation District Summary Cash Flow Projections projected PR9pPW NWry Pflm PrelMNery Wetlminpry pen.1 .ry Pr01T PWry Ihlnry Pre1NMry 11N p1eMry 10Y. Btl Needed, MO tl.& �W 060] ➢ m 9B9fl lam ta lll3 3&]0 ImM Revamwe: 1 BW1RN U.Fees 90A00,003 101,505,000 11).WW5. 0 100,108,W0 1Po.240.0W in.03 = 18B,W2.000 20),662,C00 220,11]A00 254.494.W0 1,880,816,000 2 P9NMa6 aSar Fen 4.OW,WO 6,1W.000 8.641.W0 S.Po20W SAI2.D0 9.123WC ).OPo.9W ).3]IWU ),)42.OW 0,186,W0 04A20.000 3 Peara"T.15%Yt 43,SWAW NA)ICW 4],959.9D 503571WO W,8]6,W0 W.519,0W W.2B5.000 51,210.W0 64,271.0W W.4B5.000 547.14S,W0 4 rNx COPIeNn 2D.W0,0W NO.W0.0W 220,WOW0 1% 0.,WW W W0 WO 0 MON40 225,OD W. AW 1.405.WO.WO 5 Inenet ReverMn(4%) 20.0n.0W 20.389 W,W0 1N,A1,0 isaI2,W0 I6.000100 17.== 18,W1,W0 18,224,000 nWS,WO t),2)2,W0 180,4B1,W0 5 cOnMNM FM SAW= 11.6W,OW 11.5DW, 0 11.5DW 11, 0 ,600,W BWOD 0 11. 11.68D,OW 11,SW.OW 11,50010O 11,5DW0, 113.1DW,O OIMI R... 25,1W.0W 25WW0,4 , 28.1WW0. N.M.000 27,S00.000 D,300.WD 21500,0W nI.M.000 WOOD= 13,200,000 220,600,000 5 R... 470.671,00 210.702,CW 42I,65S.0W M.320,W0 4W,257.0W 483,937.000 W1165.000 4W,910.00 347.605000 372.138.000 4,10,232.e00 Rewreererne: 0 Oper 6 Mpe ESp 90.6001W0 101,5W.000 I05.43S,W0 I09,514.0W 113.740,000 110.110,000 1221S3D0 121,1351,000 132,210,000 137,254.00O 1,134,282,0W 10 Cami lmpmeme10 Program 153A04.0W 228,561.900 M6,740.000 2W.3211WO 242.M0e) 242.04.000 276.218.00) 150.046.00 10),)00.000 W,622W0 2.0W.M..W) It Ram.Raae 6 Ralurb 27.eWAW U.Nam 331BW1000 D.SW,OOp 12 COP S."(S.M.D m) 33.97310W 41.917,WO WIN,= 62A78,000 75,69%000 W.01,000 1W,Re.OW 112.8530M 115.158.00D 115.235.00 79TWO.W0 13 OIM,RepulrenwNe 4A61,WD 3761.000 3,081.000 3.751.000 3,]61,0e) 0.251.000 7610W 1731.000 3.7E100D 3161.00 Po210M 14 RogWremaele nk318,W0 3)S729.000 488.51 W0 4%BM WO 435.M.IX0 4W234000 504,340.000 421.001,000 397,706.00 YBSWWD 4,161,e56000 15 RWYenae9-ReguMmeMa 10I2WWO nee,en.ma (38.95].000) 9,466.0M 30.692.000 D,)W,WO 20,510,000 111,OW,DWI I60.10),00) 12,673,000 MAKING Reouriteard Far.: 16 Up",M Year 4D.Ifl OW M,4M, W 437,4N000 M.M.000 407,942,0W M.M.000 40.333,1000 4Po147,W0 4P.M.000 4N.158.000 4D.1N7.0W 17 FW M Year 6W.4 W3 437.443.W0 395.431000 407,942.M aWW4.OW 488.337W0 466.147003 484205- 431.IW We -"I- --i- 16 RM.PWry W3,00.235 339,n4,04 W%13),100 4W,199,929 420,194.231 456,BN.SW McS21.909 485.54)A00 482,016,4M 40,091,875 40.691,875 spore,SBM'ea later FM: 10 4v05FR Pm WI Ueer Fee f100.W f116,W S132.W f1W.W $1]S.W f19100 5210.00 SWOM U53W f2B0.w 20 PaKOnap Chalga 14.2Mb 15.W% 14.76% 13.91% 1038% 9.71% 9.38M 9,,62% 10.00% 10.67% 21 EgWMM UveAMq UMIa NO." 083AW 886.400 WB,WO 8412.SW 896.000 Seem BWAW 905.6m M.800 22 See CaMIWp"Fee $1.820 E2.600 am WIND 32.890 NOW MAN Same, New WON 23 OMalaNlm Cope SBWAW.UW W23,526,000 3812,))0,000 W1,010.295,000 f1.ID.S8B.W0 31.305.047.000 W1.W1A2B.W0 WI,SNM,D0 SIAN4,873.000 f1,523.715,W0 Reaerve Pea, 24 SO%N.Year 0,r N, W,)%DO 52.716W0 34,M).000 SB,WO,WO 69,aW.OW G%327,000 W,NM.WO Po.10S.WD W.82).= ]6481,000 23 10%N.Year Operafl, 10.150.0W t0AU= I0,951,000 11,374.0W 11,012.M 12.20,0W 12,)35.CW 13,222,000 MMID3 14,802,D3 26 IWi4.Non YnrPUOCOPU,v 41.817,0W 48,506,000 WR)0,000 78,00.000 80.661,W0 102.724,0W 112,853.000 415,1sam 115A 000 128.9WW0 27 50%aaera9e CIPOUt0200 W.674W5 57.W3,844 50,854,100 44,387.929 NAWWI 31.556,833 21,911,9W 15,5417.400 12,420,444 0.W7,875 20 ShMNm CIP,OWRS - - 29 MR*1MM10WIUMIn9C0Pa 83,347.0W M553,000 51,27,000 101IM000 1191051SOW 13I557,0O 156,13300C) 1801059.0W 156A06,003 152,3M,D3 30 SFI OPo]mm INPUT 5]A60,0D 57,000,0O 57,003,000 57,W%0W 67,003,00 57.B00.W0 57.000,MO 87,W3.W3 57100010W 57,0W.D3 31 Rate 6 HOW,02%Jy] MODDIM 51,000W0 521YLO,CW W,WOCW fi4121,W0 fi5,2W,W3 56,30).MO 57143IW3 W,682.000 59.754,6W 32 TOW =SM,WS M,724,844 389,137.100 aw"gem 4201194,W1 06.044,03] 480,WI.9W 4N.547,aW 4W.0i64W M801,075 COP Rear 33 Sr UBa COverga,Mla I.25 2]] 261 MI 223 2.03 187 in 1,75 1.87 2.04 34 ASfiIaW Bones.1.25 2.]] 2.61 2.51 2.23 2.08 IA] 1.79 1.75 1.87 20a N:WepBegerdal oaal FgeMe RepmIa12W4 Board agerga RepaaaW 04VIW 140).1 4222004 4M PM Orange County Sanitation District Summary Cash Flow Projections P.11.1 x8 PreSWM, PGA.1mry PrO.1mry PASPI., P.WIW, P lftk ry Gmm Rd m9Enetron 13.14 1.15 1 1 1&17 17]8 18-19 law 10 Rmemea' 1 Gemm U Fee3 2 S.900,WY 'SJ7.01M ] R7.M,= 221,19 = 227,5600M 'd74MIM 223,4e9AV $,249,43 OX) QM 2 PWAe eT mFem 9.920E 7.921.E0 7.580021 7.5210E 7,4%,000 OS.= 79E.021 118.m..021 3 P COPama14%YO ]0.058.021 )4,IE,021 M,1Yt.213 B2020.021 80.128,021 %.4%,E3 94,%],OE L1N.7e.E0 4 Nex LOPlaeme - 1pO6,OLO,WO 6 Cereallm FMa(0%) ll' .M 146%.ON 21,103,W0 2g92E,0M ll2 .000 11MG03 20,4)fi,WO 194. m 9 War RevenuM 27=01M 11,560.0E 11,500.N0 11,5B3,an 11.521.E I%lW.= 11,SWA00 1%ABO,= 8 Omer nevemee 2].E0.021 12621,0E 12721.21D 19.000.M0 19.321.021 MSIOE 12221E0 3M.EU.OE 6 flavemres 368.]M,000 b4.121,0E 951,C61,OE 381,%].EO 159.]IB.EO 381.188.0E 3]1,010.060 6.]C9.022.E3 RequCmeMa: 9 Op"B wm Exp 146.BY1.021 152.511,000 150298.E0 164.2081021 1099051210 170.894.021 181,WY.21 2,313.211.E0 10 CaNW lmgavemmt PW= 26.199.E NAM,= 24,965.E 24.319.E0 2].737,= 10,01a,E0 IG647m 2216,318.= 11 Rep,R¢m ANMma 4&CEm 14,9E,E3 N.]EA00 93,4E,E0 76"MOM 33,1E.E0 1.210.9E 411.4E.0N 12 LOP9enke(5.M, EY2) 128.9%,EO 114.M= 114AM.000 1151863,E3 114.21M 3 1141211,E0 114.221,E0 1.613,053.E0 13 011m Remlmmems 3.751.0E 3.751.E 3.75L021 3.751.21 31751.210 3,751.021 0.151.21 0414671EO 14 RegOnmeme 351.6261E0 316.mM 330.168,0E 401,622E3 391,921.E 337.604.00 =69I.E3 6.619,688.E 15 Rave.R,immeme 34.6791E0 MINI.21 IS,YB = (sU66%000) Cs'lM.21) 28.21,021 47,649.213 12 max AMt mdWMI Fmg 16 Ba91mN0m Ymr 4461731,0W 481,610.E 630.47I.EO fi46.]60.E0 5E1101.60 473,956,E0 5E.941,E3 42g16].E 17 EWd Year 481.010.E 52147LOE 548,]86.21 E21E.OE 4)3,94a000 521.41,210 54%4E,M) 548.490,EO 18 Rmxve Miry 4E.0E.143 479.402921 472380.1E 470.212.2E 47d3021W 471.9 M 467.709..7E Serer Samm Meer Fees: 19 Avg SFRM.WUsm Fee 6276.E V60.E 21240.E E240 a) 21240.E 5240.E MOM uwl. 0 20 PB MW,Cmn, (l,)5%) (&M%) (70%) O.E% 0..0% O.E% 0.E% 21 EquivaWMO Ing UNa 912021 915.221 910,4E 921.6E 94.8E 08.000 931,2E 22 SFRCxmdm Fee E2.S% Max E2.021 E2.% E2.690 Was) 52,8E 23 Oewenmm CO Pa E1,469.880.021 E1,421SM.021 $1,377.E3,210 SI.320.1000M V=..OTI.21 51.217.721.0E E1.121.0M.E0 Waem PNw 24 50%Rod Y.Onmin9 18,256.E0 79,149.21 R211441021 84,916,021 67.947,210 90,736.E 901m 21 25 IMHMI vex Opntl00 16231.m 15.8210E ISM% 0 1).O m 17aw'm 10,147.E 10,14.7,0E % lM"M Yex AUG COP San 114SWOM 114.4M.E 115,eu'm 114.2BO= 114,241,E3 114,221,0E 114,221,0E 2] sm average CIP"M am 9.134,143 8.19ISSE 7,3M.121 6.125,250 3.5N,167 2681.)60 2661.7E 20 SWd lams LIP.GWRS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 MR O E%OmMMl9 CORA 1%.91ME0 112079.E 137,708.21 132010.000 127.E.021 121.775.0E llem.021 30 SRO WM. INPUT 67.210.E 57,021,0E 57.E3.M 6).mm 9.7.967.E ". m 37.EO.EO 31 PoTA 6 Rehm 0 2%lp E,M9.E0 SLIME0 6T.411.000 01.679.E 60.873.E 67.21MM WMS.EO 32 Tmu 0G.RA143 4]9,421.5E 479,888,1E 476,E ,M 47$E2167 471=7E 46),]E,]60 PROM 33 Sr Ulm Cwege.M:n 1.25 1.83 1.% 1.E 1.T 1AS 1.65 1.66 N ACEHwal BaM ,1.25 1.% 135 1.0 1.71 1.65 I'M I'm X:Weptra9eMe\eoxO A9anM ROMW,\ ON BMW A9erAe RepCs\04W\Item 1M)l � PRELIMINARY Subject to Approval MINUTES OF MEETING OF GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM STEERING COMMITTEE OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AND THE ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT March S, 2004, 5:30 p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, Chair Philip Anthony called to order the meeting of the Joint Cooperative Committee for the Groundwater Replenishment System in the Boardroom of the Orange County Water District. Director Anthony then advised that, with OCSD Director Brian Brady's departure as Alternate No. 1, Director Paul Walker would become Alternate No. 1, Director Steve Anderson would become Alternate No. 2, and Director John Collins would become Alternate No. 3 for OCSD. The following persons were present: OCSD Committee Members & Alternates OCWD Committee Members &Alternates Norman Eckenrode, Vice Chair Philip Anthony, Chair Shirley McCracken (absent) Paul Cook Brian Donahue (absent) Lawrence Kraemer, Jr. Paul Walker, Alternate No. 1 (absent) Kathryn Ban, Alternate No. 1 Steve Anderson, Alternate No. 2 Brett Franklin, Altemate No. 2 (5:50 p.m.) John Collins, Alternate No. 3 Richard Chavez, Alternate No. 3 (absent) OCSD Staff OCWD Directors Blake Anderson, General Manager Wes Bannister Bob Ooten, Director of O&M Denis Bilodeau Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager Jan Debay Carol Beekman, Communications Manager OCWD Staff Others Present Virginia Grebbien, General Manager Paul Brown, Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. Craig Miller, Assistant General Manager Bruce Chalmers, Camp Dresser& McKee, Inc. Michael Markus, Program Manager Debra Burris, DOB Engineering Shivaji Deshmukh, Senior Engineer Bob Finn, Brown & Caldwell Joanne Daugherty, Engineer Abdul Rashid!, Montgomery Watson Harza Jenny Wedge, Communications Specialist Brenda Deeley, Porter Novelli Ran Wildermuth, Director of Communications Christopher Townsend, Townsend Public Affairs Marilyn Kuga, Recording Secretary Sean Fitzgerald, Townsend Public Affairs CONSENT CALENDAR Upon motion made by Director Kraemer, seconded by Director Anderson and carried, the Consent Calendar was approved as follows: 1. Minutes of Previous Meeting The Minutes of the February 9, 2004 Joint Cooperative Committee meeting were approved as mailed. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. Award of Contract No. GWRS-2003-5, Groundwater Replenishment System Unit I Pioeline Project Senior Engineer Shivaji Desmukh made a brief presentation explaining that staff would be recommending award of the GWR System Unit I Pipeline Project to low-bidder Ken Thompson, Inc. Following a short discussion confirming bonding of this contractor, the Committee took the following action. Upon motion made by Director Anderson, seconded by Director Collins and carried, the Committee recommended that the OCWD Board, at its March 17, 2004 meeting, and the OCSD Board, at its March 24, 2004 meeting: 1) Receive and file Affidavit of Publication of Notice Inviting Bids; 2) Ratify issuance of Addenda Nos. 1 —4; and 3) Accept bid and award Contract No. GWRS-2003-5, Groundwater Replenishment System Unit I Pipeline Project, to the lowest responsive bidder, Ken Thompson, Inc., for$26,672,045. 3. Issuance of Requests for Proposals for Field and Laboratory Soils & Materials Testing Services for Groundwater Replenishment System Unit II Pipeline Project Mr. Deshmukh made a brief presentation explaining that field and laboratory soils and materials testing are required for all major construction contracts. Following discussion clarifying that Requests for Proposals would be going out to firms that could each provide all of the soils and materials testing, inspection, and geotechnical consulting services for the GWR System Unit II Pipeline Project, the Committee took the following action. Upon motion made by Director Anderson, seconded by Director Eckenrode and carried, the Committee recommended that the OCWD Board, at its March 17 meeting, authorize the issuance of Requests for Proposals for materials testing, inspection, and geotechnical consulting services for the Groundwater Replenishment System Unit II Pipeline Project INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 4. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Local Resources Program Mr. Deshmukh provided a brief background report and update on the Local Resources Program (LRP)sponsored by Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) and explained that of the 27 proposals received by MWD, 13 projects were selected for an approximate total yield of 65,000 afy, of which the GWR System Project was awarded 31,000 afy at $121/af, or$3,751,000, for operations and maintenance. 2 5. Project Schedule and Budget Update Program Manager Mike Markus provided an update summarizing the schedules and tracking of expenditures of the major contracts that comprise the Groundwater Replenishment System Project. He reported that the three pipeline contracts have yielded the greatest savings at more than $10 million under the engineer's estimate. During a brief discussion, Director Cook suggested that staff provide color graphs that would more clearly define the progress of the three different pipeline projects. Director Debay suggested that staff include names of the contractors on future charts. Director Debay commented that the Chairman of the Orange County Bicycle Coalition has complimented OCWD on bike trail issues handled by Mike Markus. 6. Construction Projects Progress Mr. Markus reported on the status of construction of the Initial Microfiltration/Site Power Distribution Project and the Unit III Pipeline Project, and provided an update on construction outreach. He also reported that a walking tour of the GWR System facility was conducted today just prior to this Board meeting. 7. Monthly Change Order Update The Committee reviewed the February 2004 Change Order Report for the Initial Microfiltration Facility, Contract No. GWRS-2003-1. 8. Status Report • Public Information and Education Update— Mr. Wildermuth provided a short video of a recent KOCE report commending the GWR System Project, with reporter Pat Haslam stating that". . . this process will exceed federal mandates and State mandates for water quality. . " Mr.Wildermuth also reported that minority and community outreach continues, that staff is planning a group GWR System update for legislators and legislative staff for this Spring; that a very successful neighborhood briefing was recently held at a school in the Ward Street neighborhood and that another briefing is being scheduled; that an information campaign on the proper disposal of household medicines has begun; and that a comparison Information sheet was handed out on the San Diego project versus the GWR System Project. General Manager Virginia Grebbien added that Dr. Jack Skinner wrote a letter to the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) supporting the GWR System Project. DIRECTORS' ANNOUNCEMENTS/REPORTS Director Anthony reported that progress of the Water Education Center would be discussed at the next Public Information and Education Update (PIE) meeting scheduled for March 18, 2004 at noon. 3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meebng Date TO ad.01 Dlr. oa/za/oa AGENDA REPORT R mNumber In Number In Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Associate Engineer III SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36, GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM ADVANCED WATER TREATMENT FACILITIES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION (1) Approve a budget amendment of$15,454,000 increasing the Orange County Sanitation District's budget for the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System to $251,660,000, and (2) Authorize award of a construction contract by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to J. F. Shea Construction, Inc., for construction of GWR System Advanced Water Treatment Facilities, Contract No. GWRS-2004-1, for an amount not to exceed $292,060,066 with OCWD paying $146,660,033 and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) paying $145,400,033. SUMMARY • In December 2003, the GWR System Steering Committee approved the plans and specifications for the GWR System Advanced Water Treatment Facilities (AWTF) with an engineer's estimate of$253,600,000. • The work includes construction of all process structures, piping and facilities that are within the boundaries of the OCWD and OCSD treatment site located at Ellis Avenue and Ward Street in Fountain Valley. • Three bids were received on March 16, 2004. Summary information on the budget and bids are as follows: Project Budget (GWR System) $ 453,900,000 Construction Budget (AWTF) $ 253,600,000 Engineer's Estimate $ 253,600,000 Low Bid $ 292,060,066 High Bid $ 334,500,464 Number of Bids 3 • A tabulation of the three bids is included in the attached Agenda Item Submittal from the April 12, 2004, GWR System Steering Committee meeting. • The contract includes an OCWD-only cost item valued at$1,260,000. The bid amount for GWR System work to be cost shared is therefore $290,800,066. XITfVpMtlevE/.pmGi 0.rynb1](Ot 9m,C ApeMs 0.pn1`dOiV Wn lyul CVm�RNTF pac X.,.w ocoi0a Page 1 r • The Project Budget for the final design and construction phase of the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System is revised from $453,900,000 to $489,600.000 to be equally shared between the agencies. • A budget amendment of$15,454,000 is requested increasing Orange County Sanitation District's share of the total budget from $236,206,000 to $251,660,000. • On April 12, 2004, the GWR System Steering Committee recommended awarding the contract to the lowest responsive bidder, J. F. Shea Construction, Inc., for the bid amount of $292,060,066. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS GWR System Steering Committee approved the Plans and Specifications for the Groundwater Replenishment System Advanced Water Treatment Facilities (AWTF) on December 1, 2003. The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Board approved the current OCSD project budget of $236,206,000 on October 23, 2002. PROJECTICONTRACT COST SUMMARY See the attached Budget Information Table. The OCSD portion of the costs for the AWTF construction contract being awarded is $145,400,033. With this action, a total of $208,410,396 is authorized for the construction phase. A budget amendment of$15,454,000 is required for this authorization. BUDGETIMPACT ❑ This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 139) ® This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) A total budget amendment of$15,454,000 for the GWR System project budget is requested as shown on the attached Budget Information Table increasing the total project budget from $236,206,000 to $251,660,000. The budget amendment includes budget increases for the award of both the AWTF and the Barrier Facilities contracts. Award of both contracts requires a budget amendment because each of the bids was over the engineer's estimate and budget. The Barrier Facilities contract award follows on the agenda for this Board Meeting, but the budget adjustment is being requested at this time as part of the total project budget amendment. H R� 15(n) MttF.•x R..•n osw,m Page 2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION r The Advanced Water Treatment Facility (AWTF) Project includes construction of AWTF structures, piping and facilities that are within the boundaries of the Orange County Water District (OCWD) and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD)treatment site located at Ellis Avenue and Ward Street in Fountain Valley. Facilities include the Screening Facility at OCSD's Plant No. 1, the 96-inch diameter influent pipeline from the Screening Facility to the Microfiltration Facility, Microfiltration Facility (86 mgd filtrate), Microfiltration Break Tank, Reverse Osmosis Facility (70 mgd permeate), UV System (70 mgd product), Post-Treatment (Hydrogen Peroxide), Chemical Feed/Lime Stabilization System, Product Water/Barrier Pump Station, and all yard piping. Included in the AWTF contract will be all electrical, instrumentation, and process control systems (PCS) associated with each facility. The MF and UV equipment have been pre-selected by the District, and their contracts will be assigned to the Contractor. Following construction, start-up and testing of the AWTF, Category 2 demolition of remaining obsolete Water Factory 21 facilities will commence. Staff recommends that the contract be awarded at this time and not rebid for the following reasons: 1. There is more cost risk in rebidding the contract. 2. Schedule delays would result in additional costs. 3. Stakeholder support could be eroded. 4. Staff has successfully negotiated cost improvements with Shea in the past. See the attached Agenda Item Submittal to the GWR System Steering Committee for additional information regarding this award and budget amendment. ADDITIONAL PROJECT/CONTRACT COST INFORMATION The low bid received was $292,060,066. This bid includes a $1,260,000 OCWD only cost item. This item is for upgrades to the process control system for existing barrier wells owned and maintained by OCWD. This work was added after the Notice Inviting Bids was published and not included in the Engineers Estimate for the AWTF. This amount of$1,260,000 will not be cost shared, leaving $290,800,066 to be equally cost shared. The adjusted AWTF contract bid of$290,800,066 is $37,200,066 (15%) over the Engineer's Estimate of$253,600,000. The OCSD cost share portion for the AWTF construction contract being awarded is $145,400,033 for a total of$208,410,396 authorized for the construction phase. The breakdown of total construction costs between the separate contracts is shown in Table 1. H.� Ag RaxvINNG G SAWIi.pC R—. odB,rro Page 3 Table 1 -Summary of Current Construction Budgetary Costs by Contract ID Contract Current Contract Cost at No. Budget Award Completion 1 Theo Lacy Pipeline Reach, GWR Portion $ 1,430,000 $ 1,430,000 $ 1.430,000 2 GWR Pipeline— Reach 1 26,673,000 26,672.045 3 GWR Pipeline— Reach 2 16,084.005 16.084.005 4 GWR Pipeline—Reach 3 16,989,000 16,989.000 5 Temp MF/Site work/Site Power 17,139.646 17,139,646 6 Southeast Barrier Pipeline 3,773.561 3,381,000 3,773,561 7 West End Barrier Pipeline 264,762 264,762 '8 1 Advanced Water Treatment Facility 290,800,066 292,060,066 9 SCE Work for Permanent Substation 2,396,000 2,396,000 2,396.000 10 Barrier Well Drilling/Monitoring 12,446,935 Wells/Wellhead Facildies/Pi elines 11 GWR Team Temp Offices/rrailers 807,000 783,990 807,000 12 Southern California Water Co. Well 1.635,000 13 Vendor Design Submittals for MF and 861,526 750.000 861.526 UV 14 Emerson Process Control System 2,793,363 2.793.363 15 Inte rated Information System 4,860,000 16 Owner Controlled Insurance Program 7,385,937 7,384,937 17 Warehouse Equipment 250,000 Current Construction Total $406,589,801 $388,128,814 $9 268 087 'The contract award amount is more than the budget because the Orange County Water District (OCWD) will pay$1,260,000 of the contract with no Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) participation. The OCWD has funded the $1,260,000 outside the GWR System project budget. ADDITIONAL BUDGET IMPACT INFORMATION A budget amendment is necessary for the award of this contract. With the budget amendment for construction of the Advanced Water Treatment Facilities (AWTF), additional budget adjustments are requested. The total program budget for the Final Design and Construction of the GWR System was approved at$453,900,000 in October 2002. The OCSD current approved budget is $236,206,000 for the OCSD share of the$453,900,000 plus prior costs and internal non-shared costs. Prior costs are for Project Development and Preliminary Design Phase while internal costs include staff, lab work, legal fees, and other miscellaneous charges. All of the capital projects have been bid and their costs are now known. An adjustment to the total program budget to reflect the actual bid prices of all construction projects and their contingencies as well as budgeting all Engineering, Legal and Administrative items to completion of the project is requested. An increase of$33,000,000 to the total program budget for the Final Design and Construction of the GWR System is requested for a new total of$486,900,000. The budget amendment will allow for higher than N:WgOpwWBwENperW Pgv1,V Wi BmC�pe,W Rep1fD,MYYm 1l�O).4WN8�WItAx R� Page 4 o estimated costs for construction of the Advanced Water Treatment Facilities (AWTF) and Barrier Facilities, and to also allow budget for some additional estimated professional services during construction. Y An Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) budget increase of less than half the $33,000,000 program budget adjustment is requested at a total of $15,454,000. The attached Budget Information Table shows the budget details. The following Table 2 provides comments on the proposed budget increase/decrease shown in the attached Budget Information Table. Table 2— Comments on Proposed Budget Change by Phase Phase Proposed Comments Budget Change 1-Project Development $ 7,000 Phase complete, minor adjustment to reflect actual costs. 2-Preliminary Design 8,000 Phase complete, minor adjustment to reflect actual costs. 3-Design (3,787,000) Phase complete, reassessment of costs to cover encumbered design costs allows reduction from current budget. 4-Construction 16,078,000 Increase needed for AWTF and Barrier Facilities construction bid costs in excess of Engineer's Estimate. Proposed budget change is less than the costs over the Engineer's Estimate is due to other GWR System pipeline contracts bidding at substantially less than the Engineer's Estimate. Increase also includes some additional professional services during construction see Table 2). 5-Commissioning 977,000 Shift of existing budget in Construction Phase to Commissioning Phase. 6-Close-Out 171,000 Shift of existing budget in Construction Phase to Close-Out Phase. 7-Contingency 2,000,000 Increase brings total contingency to $12,000,000 which is half of$24,000,000 which is approximately 5% of revised total GWR System program budget of $489,600,000 TOTAL $15,454,000 In addition to budget revisions necessary to allow award of the Advanced Water Treatment Facilities construction contract are revisions to the various professional services contracts, and a budget adjustment which is necessary to allow award of the Barrier Facilities construction contract. With the approval of this budget amendment, the Barrier Facilities construction budget will be $12,446,935. This new budget includes a construction budget increase of H We0�0mkalBovd ABantla Fearlal B rtl A,ft Ra,a .Nll.15(DI CNBRS A`M da n�;:ad: osroaav Page 5 e $330,419 from $12,116,516 to $12,446,935 for the Barrier Facilities. Award of the Barrier Facilities contract follows on the agenda for this Board Meeting, but the budget adjustment is being requested as part of the total budget revision at this time. F Table 3 provides a summary of required budget revisions necessary to provide additional professional services during the construction phase of the project. Individual contracts will be amended as required by actions of the Orange County Water District and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Boards of Directors. Table 3 —Additional Professional Services During Construction Professional Service Estimated Cost Escalation for Construction Management Services $ 630,000 Professional Services Agreement(PSA) cost share increase of$315,000 shown in Budget Information Table Escalation for& scope changes for Design Services 530,000 PSA cost share increase of$265,000 shown in Budget Information Table Extension to project completion for Laura Thomas 300,000 Additional inspection fees County of Orange 100,000 Additional pipeline inspectors 900,000 Paleontological Monitoring 200,000 Noise Study and Monitoring 200,000 Miscellaneous Adjustments 106,734 Total 2,966,734 The cost breakdown for the final design and construction phases of the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) revised budget to be cost shared is: Construction: $406,590,000 Engineering, Legal Administration: $ 60,226,000 Project Contingency: $ 20,084,000 Total: $486.900,000 The OCSD Capital Budget is: GWRS Final Design and Construction Cost Shared Costs: $ 243,450,000 Preliminary Design and OCSD Only Costs: $ 8,210,000 Total Capital Cost to OCSD $ 251,660,000 Grants $ (45,000,000) Net Cost after Grants $ 206,660,000 ALTERNATIVES Staff considered alternatives to bring the cost closer the original budget. The analysis showed that there was higher probability towards a higher cost if the project was rebid. KWplWpmq.l0eml AAgW.RegW.1A%B MAgm RepwltOlO.Wmm 15 )MR9l,Wfi.M[ R..I..a.a W Page 6 See the attached Agenda Item Submittal to the GWR System Steering Committee for ' additional information. CECA FINDINGS The Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) for the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System was certified by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Board of Directors on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001. Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002, and by OCWD on January 16, 2002. Addendum No. 3 was approved by OCSD on March 24, 2004 and by the GWR System Steering Committee on December 1, 2003. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Agenda Item Submittal to the GWR System Steering Committee re: Award of Contract No. GWRS-2004-1, Groundwater Replenishment System Advanced Water Treatment Facilities 2a. Table is attachment to: Agenda Item Submittal to the GWR System Steering Committee re: Award of Contract No. GWRS-2004-1, Groundwater Replenishment System Advanced Water Treatment Facilities H.WBp1aBageBWtlP¢Me Repola BOLD/ R[pe15WiDfYXm 15�B1.b SPWIF.Rc Page 7 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT(GWR) SYSTEM JOB NO.J-36 P�iOPOSED ORIGINAL CURRENT EUDbET F OPOSEb FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTJMAT PROJECTRHI ,E,; AUTHORbCn PROJECT ICI�FASE ':REVIB�O ' AU7HOR�D'f0 AIIZH Oil ' N �TdTAt< t �yE��NNfi e eulfDET, EII�SE� D�EA9E EubatT OATS R€qu "i ,S °It�UWf+C . Phase 1 -Pm d Development $ 700000 E 4000 E 7000 $ 11000 It 11000 $ 11000 $ 10000 91% Phase 2-Prearrune Design E 3 313.0DD S 8.000 $ 3.321 000 It 3.321 000 It - It 3,321 000 $ 3,317,000 100% Phase 3-Deal n $ 9.849,0001 It 20957,000 It 3787000 It 17170000 $ 17.170000 $ 17170000 $ 14900000 67% Phase 4-Construction $ 98.481,000 1 $ 201,93200D S 18078000 $ 218010000 S 63010363 11 146 00033 It 205.410396 $ 9500000 5% Phase 5-Commissioning $ 97T 000 $ 977000 It - $ 0% Phase 6-Clow-Out E 171000 $ 171000 $ - $ 0% Phan 7-Contingency $ 12.895000 $ 10,000000 S 2.000000 $ 12000,000 $ 0% PROJECTTOTAL It 121.925.000 $ 236,206,000 E 15,454,000 $ 251,660.000 $ 83.512.363 $ 145,400.033 $ 228,912,396 $ 27.727,000 12% Reimbursable Costs $ 45,000.000 1 It 45,000,000 $ 45AD.WD It 45.000.000 1 $ 6,344,000 14% PROJECT NET $ 121,925,000 $ 191,206,000 1 S 15,454,000 $ 206,660'aw $ 38,512,363 $ 145.400,033. $ 183,912,396 $ 21.383,000 12% PSAIContnct Design PSA $ 16.112.652 S 265000 5 16.377 552 F i S 15,387.552 S - It 15.387.552 $ 14.567.320 95% Construction Manangemer4 Services PSA S 6.4452113 S 315000 $ 6760283 i�, $ 8445283 $ - $ 6445,263 S 1582638 25% Construction Contract $ 203.294901 S - E 203294901 $ 48297.920 S 1ASAMM3 S 193697--- S -------- - H:Ylepaeaan4a,Bom404m4a RapablMM aeeNApmEe llpMeV1f04a1an 15101.1 � � B 0 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: April 12, 2004 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 501-5049-722.60-01 System Steering Committee Cost Estimate: $253,613,782 From: Virginia Grebbien General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEOA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Mike Markus Subject: AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. GWRS-2004-1, GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM ADVANCED WATER TREATMENT FACILITY PROJECT SUMMARY Three bids for Contract No. GW RS-2004-1, Groundwater Replenishment System Advanced Water Treatment Facility, were received and opened on March 16, 2004. Following evaluation of the bids, staff recommends awarding the contract to the lowest responsive bidder, J. F. Shea Construction, Inc., for the bid amount of $292,060,066, which is 15% over the Engineer's estimate. This recommendation is being made because (1) There would be more cost risk in not awarding the contract; (2) Schedule delays would result in additional costs; and (3) Stakeholder support could be eroded. With award of this contract, the overall program budget will need to be increased from $453,900,000 to $486,900,000. RECOMMENDATION Agendize for the April 21 OCW D and April 28 OCSD Board meetings: 1) Receive and file Affidavit of Publication of Notice Inviting Bids; 2) Ratify issuance of Addenda Nos. 1 -6; and 3) Accept bid and award Contract No. GWRS-2004-1, Groundwater Replenishment System Advanced Water Treatment Facility Project, to the lowest responsive bidder, J. F. Shea Construction, Inc. for$292,060,066; and 4) Increase the program budget from $453,900,000 to$486,900,000. 0 I DISCUSSIOWANALYSIS In December 2003, the GWR System Steering Committee approved plans and specifications and authorized solicitation of bids for the Groundwater Replenishment System Advanced Water Treatment Facility (AWTF) Project. The work includes construction of AWTF structures, piping and facilities that are within the boundaries of the OCWD and OCSD treatment site located at Ellis Avenue and Ward Street in Fountain Valley. Facilities include the Screening Facility at OCSD's Plant No. 1, the 96- inch diameter influent pipeline from the Screening Facility to the Microfiltration Facility, Microfiltration Facility (86 mgd filtrate), Microfiltration Break Tank, Reverse Osmosis Facility (70 mgd permeate), UV System (70 mgd product), Post-Treatment (Hydrogen Peroxide), Chemical Feed/Lime Stabilization System, Product Water/Barrier Pump Station, and all yard piping. Included in the AWTF contract will be all electrical, instrumentation, and process control systems (PCS) associated with each facility. The MF and UV equipment have been pre-selected by the District, and their contracts will be assigned to the Contractor. Following construction, start-up and testing of the AWTF, Category 2 demolition of remaining obsolete Water Factory 21 facilities will commence. The Notice Inviting Bids was published on December 1 , 2003, and six addenda were issued on December 5, 2003, January 20, 2004, January 24, 2003, February 19, 2004, February 25, 2004, and March 8, 2004, which provided clarifications to the plans and specifications. Bids were opened on March 16, 2004, and a total of three bids were received. The companies that submitted bids and their respective bid amounts were as follows: J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. $ 292,0603066 Kiewit Pacific Co. $ 293,3483000 Archer Western Contractors, Ltd. $ 334,5003464 The low bid received was significantly higher (15%) than the Engineer's estimate of $253,613,782. Staff met with the apparent low bidder the day after the bid opening to discuss in general terms where the differences in the estimates were. An outcome of this meeting was that the Engineer developed a spreadsheet breaking the estimate into major comparative categories. Both Engineer and contractor entered their costs into each category, and it became apparent that a major difference was in the cost of steel and stainless steel materials, which were attributed to the recent increases in the steel market. After a closer examination of the estimate, it was determined that the following four areas contributed to the cost increases: 1. Steel Prices ($23.6 million) —The final project cost estimate was prepared in September 2003, at a time when steel prices began to rise. Prices for reinforcing steel, structural steel, carbon steel pipe and stainless steel pipe have risen by over 60% since that point in time. a 2. Scope Changes ($2.1 million) —Several items include noise mitigation measures for demolition and pile driving, increased piling at the RO area and the requirement for pile driving contractors to use a hydraulic hammer. 3. Low Engineer's Estimate ($8.1 million)— Several areas identified where the Engineer's estimate differed from the contractor's estimate included shoring and dewatering, yard piping installation and paintings &coatings. The Engineer is further evaluating these areas to try to determine why there are such significant differences. 4. Market Uncertainty ($5.0 million) — It appears that, because of the uncertainty in the steel market, both suppliers and contractors added contingencies into their estimates to protect themselves from future cost increases. After identifying the differences in estimates, staff met independently and developed a list of cost-cutting ideas that could reduce the overall cost of the project. The next step was to utilize risk management software for developing a decision-making model to help with arriving at a recommended course of action. The first step was to identify significant areas of uncertainty in the estimate and then estimate a range of outcomes and price impacts in these areas. Reasonable probabilities were then assigned and the analyses run. The outcome of the analysis was that if minor revisions were done to the project and it was rebid, there would be a 43%, probability the bids would be lower and a 57% probability the bids would be higher. The costs could range from a low of $260 million to a high of $320 million. Staff recommends that the contract be awarded for the following reasons: 1. There is more cost risk in not awarding the contract - Because of the continued escalation and uncertainty with steel prices and the dramatic impact this market has on the cost of the project, it is more likely the contract price would increase if the project were rebid. 2. Schedule delays would result in additional costs— If the project were rebid, it would add several months to the completion of the project, which would result in further escalated construction costs as well as additional costs to consultants. 3. Stakeholder support could be eroded—A delay in the project could result in a loss of confidence in the stakeholder support that has been cultivated over the past few years and open the project to outside criticism. Staff has evaluated the bid of J. F. Shea Construction, Inc. and found it to be complete and responsive. J. F. Shea Construction, Inc. has the appropriate Stale contractors license, which is current and in good standing. References have also been checked and found acceptable. The bid contained a cost reimbursable bid item of $1,260,000 for PCS upgrades, including controls integration, hardware and software, equipment and instrumentation facilities removal and installation at 36 existing OCW D barrier well sites. This work will be paid solely by OCW D. The adjusted GW R System work is valued at$290,800,066, which is 14.7% over the Engineers Estimate. P All of the capital projects have been bid and their costs are now known. The budget , has been adjusted to reflect the actual bid prices of all construction projects and their contingencies as well as budgeting all ELA items to completion of the project. The budget needs to be increased by$33 million for a final program budget of $486,900,000 (attachment). PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS December t, 2003 - Approval of plans and specifications and solicitation of bids. GWR System Revised Program Budget CAPITAL COSTS IMn Deserigbn Estbnata Conlingenty Butl9el Addhimel Cant Comings Wto Butl9elto to Cam Com Ms Com Mion 1 Ativarcetl Water Tmelm—W Fedli S1 E 13783 S 12.680,689 2W 2B4472 S 37.186283 § 1,859,314 § 305.3400W Subtotal AWN S 263,813,783 $ 12,M,689 $ 266,294A72 S 3],1S62Y4 S 1,E56314 $ 303.3W.069 2 MF n Sery $ 616A28 1 $ 81fi.M M2.�= 3 W E Sarvkes E 204,900 S 249,800 Subtoal Pra-SMmlbn 8arvime S EE1.51% $ 861,626 4 P mM BCM TWi s W7.000 f W7000 5 Tam MFSile Paver Dlsl. K~ $ 17,139.546 $ 856.882 E 17988828 8 e VCIia e8.1on SCE § 23 ,QW 23 ,DD0 0SuWO Tem E MA42,648 S M.M $ 21,199,626 8 ] OWR Un01 Tkom son $ 26.673.M $ 1.333.6W 28008.6W E 28.006.650 8 OWR ne Un82 Colich E 16,084,005 E 804 16888 $ 16888 8 OWR 'ne Un43 om eon S 18989000 E M9.45O 17838493 E 178384W 10 IGWR Pi 'ne If 1.430.000 I 1430000 I IE 14300W SuMl lOWR P4WI.1 S 61,176,00E 15 2.907,300 Is Mlw,305 I $ 64,163,305 11 SE BeMer ne Bum E 3.773.551 1 S 3773561 3773 551 12 Ranier FadaSm Cbrieterean E 1 118 18 E 805.826 f 1 M342 $ =419 S 16b21 $ 13068282 13 Wml Ertl Barrier Dal'ch Is 280.762 $ 13238 228000 $ MIM Sub Barrierj S /4154AMS 15 619:064 $ 16.]73.B03 $ 336416 $ te,ffit S 17.1M.843 14 We SCWCI Is 1 E 1835000 1 1 Is iM.OW 15 OCIP Is 7.385.937 $ 7335937'1 1 $ 733593] 16 IS mkt E 1,]W 000 E 1 7W 000 I S 17W.000 17 WSlr a0a8m ask 28 E 2.]W 000 2]5(1000 $ 2]W 000 18 11S mk 29 $ 3W.000 3W 000 S 3W000 19 EnlenonPCS HeNWa 1$ 2.793.383 E 21MIM 1 1 $ 4793,383 ?.0 Wmeboum Sm e Is 2W.000 I Is 2W000 I I § 250900 SubtoM Mhmllanewre $ 16.M=1 1$ 16A24.3W I 1 $ 16,924= TOTAL CAKM COST 1$ 369,073,099 $ 17,144,036 1$ 36E317,135 $ 37 1 702 13 tAnkm E 425.606672 TOTAL ELA COST $ 66,2E7,124 1 1$ 56.2E7.124 1 S 2,966,734 1 S UNA70 I S 81.29 An 21 P mm Corm 11,425,7411 22 Oeba ram E 11425.]41 TOTALESCALATEDPROJECT COST E 426.330.M $ 17,1NA36 S 442,474,268 $ 40,483.436 I S 3.942.305E 4B8,800,000 AtldOww m El irld". 1 Escalation for MWH eonlrad E 630000 2 Es bon for8 sfw CDMmnKad $ 00.000 3 Eaenaloom Mtion fw team Th S 300.000 4 Ad&bDrW fees for PFBRD S 100000 5 A6®tiaW m $ 800.000 6 Ardleo Pe Mwtllwlm S 200000 7 NoiwSkdvwAM wra E M,= 8 MwMlenwmAomiman% $ 106.734 TOW 3 2,988.7M BOARD OF DIRECTORS NeeUng DaW I TOBC. dr. a(zeioa Or AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number s(d Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Associate Engineer III SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36, GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM BARRIER FACILITIES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize award of a construction contract by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to Layne Christensen Company, for construction of Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System Barrier Facilities, Contract No. GW RS-2003-3, for an amount not to exceed $12,621,053, with OCWD and Orange County Sanitation District paying equal shares of$6,310,526.50. SUMMARY • In December 2003, the GWR System Steering Committee approved the plans and specifications for the GWR System Barrier Facilities. The engineer's estimate is $12,100,000 • This project involves drilling and installing eight injection wells and installing approximately 1,200 linear feet of 36-inch in Ellis Avenue between Newland Street and Beach Boulevard. • Six bids were received on March 25, 2004. Summary information on the budget and bids are as follows: Project Budget (GWR System) $ 453,900,000 Construction Budget (Barrier Facilities) $ 12,446,935 Engineer's Estimate $ 12,100,000 Low Bid $ 12,621,053 High Bid $ 16,700,000 Number of Bids 6 Adjusted Bid to be cost shared $ 12,446,935 • The contract includes a reimbursable bid item from the City of Huntington Beach valued at $174,11 B. Therefore, the adjusted bid is $12,446,935 for GWR System work. • A tabulation of the three bids is included in the attached Agenda Item Submittal from the April 12, 2004, GWR System Steering Committee meeting. X Wepfupni6aBouGNpeMe MpeM2Wt BoaM�peMe FlNM1iVNOfVpm 13�c1.OWR5PweN Bamc,.Ccc XmnE: osaena Page 1 • On April 12, 2004, the GWR System Steering Committee recommended awarding the contract to the lowest responsive bidder, Layne Christensen Company the bid ; amount of $12,621,053. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System Steering Committee approved the Plans and Specifications for the Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Facilities on December 1, 2003. A Final Design and Construction Program Budget amendment and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) budget amendment approval is recommended in a previous action at this April 28, 2004 Board meeting. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See the attached Budget Information Table. The value of the contract awarded with this action to be cost shared is $12,621,053, with Orange County Water District (OCWD) and OCSD paying equal shares of $6,310,526.50. Authorization of $6,310,526.50 for construction is being requested for a total construction phase authorization of$214,720,923. The contract includes a reimbursable bid item from the City of Huntington Beach valued at $174,118. Therefore, the adjusted bid is $12,446,935 for GWR System work. The final amount to be cost shared after reimbursement by the City of Huntington Beach is $6,223,467.50. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8. Page 139,revised 04/28/04) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) With the budget amendment in the previous Board action for the GWR System, no change to the project budget is being requested as shown on the attached Budget Information Table. The Barrier Facilities construction budget is $12,446,935 based on the new program budget of $486,900,000 as amended in the previous Board action. This new budget included a budget revision of$330,419 to increase the budget to $12,446,935 for the Barrier Facilities. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Barrier Facilities contract consists of drilling injection wells at eight sites, installing wellhead facilities at those injection well sites, and extending the west barrier pipeline. Four new injection wells will be drilled and cased, generally along Ellis Avenue between H'.WeO,.,.ndu'Bawd AOenCn Fa0aM3Bdf Bou,d Ap-.Rpfte .11.m 151C111R1 A-11.,-dm A—dd .1..1 Page 2 r Newland Street and Beach Boulevard in Huntington Beach. The remaining four new injection wells would be drilled and cased generally along the west bank of the Santa ' Ana River, just north of Adams Avenue in Huntington Beach. At each well site, wellhead facilities consisting of drop piping, above ground piping, valves, and site appurtenances, including the process control system, will be constructed. The barrier pipeline for the wells would consist of approximately 1,200 linear feet of 36-inch diameter pipe that would extend from Newland Street to Beach Boulevard on Ellis Avenue. Orange County Water District (OCWD) developed a project to upgrade the process control system for their existing twenty-three barrier wells, which they requested be combined with the Barrier Facility project. In doing so, the process control system for the entire barrier well system would be installed by a single subcontractor making the implementation and integration of the process control system easier. This work was originally included as a separate bid item in the Barrier Facility project and would be paid for solely by OCWD. The engineer's estimate for the Groundwater Replenishment (GW R) System Barrier Facilities work was estimated at $12,100,000 and upgrades to the OCWD process control system for their existing twenty-three barrier wells was estimated at $1,000,000 for a total engineer's estimate of $13,100,000. Through an addendum to the Barrier Facility project, the process control system work was removed and included with the Advanced Water Treatment Facilities contract. Since the barrier well control and the treatment plant control systems need to work seamlessly together, this change would allow one subcontractor to install the entire process control system for all barrier wells and the treatment plant assuring the smooth integration of barrier wells control with the treatment plant control system. This work reduced the original engineer's estimate of $13,100,000 reported to the GWR System Steering Committee by $1,000,000 to a revised estimate of$12,100,000. The low bid received was $12,621,053. This bid includes a cost reimbursable bid item for the City of Huntington Beach of $174,118 for some street work that was carried in this contract and not included in the engineer's estimate. The adjusted Barrier Facilities work that will be cost shared is valued at$12,446,935, which is $346,935 (or 3%) above the engineer's estimate of$12,100,000. The Barrier Facilities construction budget is $12,446,935 based on the new program budget of$486,900,000 as amended in the previous Board action. This new budget includes a budget revision of $330,419 to increase the budget to $12,446,935 for the Barrier Facilities. The breakdown of total construction costs between the separate contracts is shown in the following table. H:WBp9agBIdBIBO&E Agenda Nepa,nA2004 Roane!Agenda flrywneWOlWm 151c1.GWM Aea,E Eamer,O% R.O.:daroarw Page 3 t Summary of Current Construction Budgetary Costs by Contract , ID Contract Current Contract Cost at No. Budget Award Completion 1 Theo Lacy Pipeline Reach, GWR Portion $ 1,430,000 $ 1,430,000 $ 1,430,000 2 GWR Pipeline— Reach 1 26,673,000 26,672,045 3 GWR Pipeline— Reach 2 16,084,005 16,084,005 4 GWR Pipeline— Reach 3 16,989,000 16,989 000 5 TempMF/Site work/Site Power 17,139,646 17,139,646 6 Southeast Barrier Pipeline 3,773,561 3,381,000 3,773,561 7 1 West End Barrier Pipeline 264,762 264,762 8 Advanced Water Treatment Facility 290,800,066 1 292,060,066 9 SCE Work for Permanent Substation 2,396,000 2,396,000 2,396,000 10 Barrier Well DrillingNAonitoring 12,446,935 12,621,053 Wells/Wellhead Facilities/Pipelines 11 GWR Team Temp Offices/Trailers 807,000 783,990 807,000 12 Southern California Water Co.Well 1,635,000 13 Vendor Design Submittals for MF and 861,526 750,000 861,526 UV 14 1 Emerson Process Control System 2,793,363 2,793,363 15 IM rated Inforrnation System 4,860,000 16 Owner Controlled Insurance Program 7,385,937 7,384,937 17 Warehouse Equipment 250,000 Current Construction Total $406,589,801 $400,749 867 1 $9,268,087 The cost breakdown for the final design and construction phases of the Groundwater Replenishment System (GW RS) budget to be cost shared is: Construction: $406,590,000 Engineering, Legal Administration: $ 60,226,000 Project Contingency: $ 20,084,000 Total: $486,900,000 The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Capital Budget is: GW RS Final Design and Construction Cost Shared Costs: $243,450,000 Preliminary Design and OCSD-only Costs: $ 8,210,000 Total Capital Costs to OCSD $251,660,000 Grants $ (45,000,000) Net Costs after Grants $206,660,000 ALTERNATIVES No recommended alternatives exist other than awarding to the lowest bidder. XMepfu�TpBnCi flepp,g4Ne B fd AgFg9 gB{VM1S Mm 1NC)GWRS Ax B¢merEx ne:ced: aswroa Page 4 f CEQA FINDINGS The Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) for the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System was certified by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and the Orange County Water District (OCW D) Board of Directors on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001. Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002, and by OCW D on January 16, 2002. Addendum No. 3 was approved by OCSD on March 24, 2004 and by the GWR System Steering Committee on December 1, 2003. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Agenda Item Submittal to the GWR System Steering Committee re: Award of Contract No. GWRS-2003.3, Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Facilities W S:lc x won�ve. mea.a noero.caponrzooa eoa,a ngmae neponavwoavmm is�q.cwns nw:m e.ma,.eoo R-.W: WWO3 Page 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT(GWR) SYSTEM JOB NO. J-36 ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/PHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED gUTHORIZEO TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED TO. BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE/DECREASE BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE DATE(%) Phase l -Project Dovoloment $ 700,000 $ 111000 $ 11,000 $ 11,000 $ 11,000 $ 10,000 91% Phase 2.Prell.1my Design $ 3,321.000 $ 3,321.000 $ 3,327 000 $ $ 3,327 000 $ 3.317 000 10D% Phase 3-Desin $ 9,809000 $ 17,170,000 $ 17,170,000 $ 1]170(XX $ 17,170,000 $ 14,900,000 87% Phase 4-Construction $ 98.481,000 $ 218,010,000 $ 218,010,000 $ 208,410.396 $ 6310627 $ 214.720.923 $ 9.500,000 4% Phase 5-Commissioning $ 977,0DO $ 9n,000 $ - $ 0% Phase 8-Close-Out $ 171,000 $ 171.000 ` $ - $ 0% Phase 7-Contingency $ 12,895.000 $ 12,0DO,000 $ 12,000.000 $ 0% PROJECT TOTAL $ 121,925,000 $ 251,660,000 $ - $ 251,660,OOD $ 228.912,398 $ 6,310.527 $ 235,222,923 $ 27,727,000 12% Reimbursable Costs $ 45,000,000 1 $ 45,000,0DO 11$ 45.000,000 1$ 87,059 $ 45,087,059 $ 5,344,000 1 14% PROJECT NET 1 $ 121,925,000 1 $ 191,206,000 $ - $ 206,660,000 11 $ 183,912,396 $ 6,223,466 1 $ 190,135,66I 1 $ 21,383,000 11% PSAIContract Design PEA $ 16,377,552 It 16137],552 $ 15387,552 $ - $ 15,387.552 $ 14,567,320 95% Constmction Menengement Services PSA $ 6760.283 $ 6.760.283 $ 6.445,283 $ - $ 8445.283 $ 1,582638 25% Construction Contract $ 203,294.901 $ - $ 203.294.901 $ 193.697,953 $ 8310527 $ 200.008.480 $ 13,388,749 7% X:Wp11e0aMeUbaM RprMe RBI>JaeIPa4l BceNNpeMe Rs{rorISN11(NVIem 13tc1.1 � �I� i n AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: April 12, 2004 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 501-5049-722.60-01 System Steering Committee Cost Estimate: $12,116,516 From: Virginia Grebbien General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEGA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Anthony Manzano Subject: AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. GWRS-2003-3, GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM BARRIER FACILITIES PROJECT SUMMARY Three bids for Contract No. GW RS-2003-3, Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Facilities Project, were received and opened on March 25, 2004. Following evaluation of the bids, staff recommends awarding the contract to the lowest responsive bidder, Layne Christensen Company, for the bid amount of$12,621,053. The bid contained a cost reimbursable bid item from the City of Huntington Beach of $174,118 for street work on Ellis that is included in this contract. The adjusted GW R System work is valued at $12,446,935, which is 2.7% over the Engineer's Estimate. RECOMMENDATION Agendize for the April 21 OCW D and April 28 OCSD Board meetings: 1) Receive and file Affidavit of Publication of Notice Inviting Bids; 2) Ratify issuance of Addenda Nos. 1 -7; and 3) Accept bid and award Contract No. GWRS-2003-3, Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Facilities Project, to the lowest responsive bidder, Layne Christensen Company, for$12,621,053. DISCUSSIONIANALYSIS In December 2003, the GW R System Steering Committee approved plans and specifications and authorized solicitation of bids for the Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Facilities Project. The work includes construction of injection wells, "nested" monitoring wells, pipelines, electrical, mechanical and instrumentation, including an extensive upgrade of the existing Process Control System (PCS). This includes 2,200 linear feet of 30-inch pipeline, 2,200 linear feet of (twin 2-inch and single 4-inch) PVC conduits, and 8 pre-cast concrete pull boxes for communication and power i facilities. Also included is 2,250 linear feet of an 18-inch storm drain, a concrete junction box, and a connection to an existing 24-inch stone drain. There are 16 injection wells at 8 well sites and associated civil and site work including well heads, mechanical equipment, piping, fittings, miscellaneous appurtenances, electrical and instrumentation facilities; also 4"nested" monitoring wells at 4 additional sites with associated civil and site work. The Notice Inviting Bids was published on December 1, 2003, and seven addenda were issued on December 5, 2003, January 19, 2004, February 2, 2004, February 12, 2004, February 26, 2004, March 5, 2004, and March 18, 2004, which provided clarifications to the plans and specifications. Bids were opened on March 25, 2004, and a total of three bids were received. The companies that submitted bids and their respective bid amounts were as follows: Layne Christensen Company $ 12,621,053 Bakersfield Well and Pump $ 15,464,686 Beylik Drilling, Inc. $ 16,700,000 Staff has evaluated the bid of Layne Christensen Company and found it to be complete and responsive. Layne Christensen Company has the appropriate State contractor's license, which is current and in good standing. References have also been checked and found acceptable. The bid contained a cost reimbursable bid item from the City of Huntington Beach of $174,118 for street work on Ellis that is included in this contract. The adjusted GW R System work is valued at $12,446,935, which is 2.7% over the Engineer's Estimate. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS December 1, 2003 - Approval of plans and specifications and solicitation of bids. I� BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To�28t04Dr. AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number 15c Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Associate Engineer III SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36, GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM BARRIER FACILITIES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize award of a construction contract by the Orange County Water District (OCW D) to Layne Christensen Company, for construction of Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System Barrier Facilities, Contract No. GWRS-2003-3, for an amount not to exceed $12,621,053, with OCWD and Orange County Sanitation District paying equal shares of$6,310,526.50. SUMMARY • In December 2003, the GWR System Steering Committee approved the plans and specifications for the GWR System Barrier Facilities. The engineer's estimate is $123100,000 • This project involves drilling and installing eight injection wells and installing approximately 1,200 linear feet of 36-inch in Ellis Avenue between Newland Street and Beach Boulevard. • Six bids were received on March 25, 2004. Summary information on the budget and bids are as follows: Project Budget (GWR System) $ 453,900,000 Construction Budget (Barrier Facilities) $ 12,446,935 Engineer's Estimate $ 12,100,000 Low Bid $ 12,621,053 High Bid $ 16,700,000 Number of Bids 6 Adjusted Bid to be cost shared $ 12,446,935 • The contract includes a reimbursable bid item from the City of Huntington Beach valued at$174,118. Therefore, the adjusted bid is $12,446,935 for GWR System work. • A tabulation of the three bids is included in the attached Agenda Item Submittal from the April 12, 2004, GWR System Steering Committee meeting. N bep0apenJa\BoaN ABeAtld P.1 0W B00tl AOBntl>BBOOtl9!0.fOJ\Item 151C1 GWRS A—m 8.,ft, % 8.,..d Page 1 • On April 12, 2004, the GWR System Steering Committee recommended awarding the contract to the lowest responsive bidder, Layne Christensen Company the bid amount of $12,621,053. ` PRIOR COMMITTEEBOARD ACTIONS Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System Steering Committee approved the Plans and Specifications for the Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Facilities on December 1, 2003. A Final Design and Construction Program Budget amendment and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) budget amendment approval is recommended in a previous action at this April 28, 2004 Board meeting. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See the attached Budget Information Table. The value of the contract awarded with this action to be cost shared is $12,621,053, with Orange County Water District (OCWD) and OCSD paying equal shares of $6,310,526.50. Authorization of $6,310,526.50 for construction is being requested for a total construction phase authorization of $214,720,923. The contract includes a reimbursable bid item from the City of Huntington Beach valued at $174,118. Therefore, the adjusted bid is $12,446,935 for GWR System work. The final amount to be cost shared after reimbursement by the City of Huntington Beach is $6,223,467.50. BUDGETIMPACT ® This Item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 139,revised 04/28/04) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) With the budget amendment in the previous Board action for the GWR System, no change to the project budget is being requested as shown on the attached Budget Information Table. The Barrier Facilities construction budget is $12,446,935 based on the new program budget of $486,900,000 as amended in the previous Board action. This new budget included a budget revision of $330,419 to increase the budget to $12,446,935 for the Barrier Facilities. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Barrier Facilities contract consists of drilling injection wells at eight sites, installing wellhead facilities at those injection well sites, and extending the west barrier pipeline. Four new injection wells will be drilled and cased, generally along Ellis Avenue between H And.R.dOM1NOC WoW A,M.Re mWMI..15(.)aWR6 A—o HaM.,. R.'.. oHaaros Page 2 Newland Street and Beach Boulevard in Huntington Beach. The remaining four new injection wells would be drilled and cased generally along the west bank of the Santa Ana River, just north of Adams Avenue in Huntington Beach. At each well site, wellhead facilities consisting of drop piping, above ground piping, valves, and site appurtenances, including the process control system, will be constructed. The barrier pipeline for the wells would consist of approximately 1,200 linear feet of 36-inch diameter pipe that would extend from Newland Street to Beach Boulevard on Ellis Avenue. Orange County Water District (OCWD) developed a project to upgrade the process control system for their existing twenty-three barrier wells, which they requested be combined with the Barrier Facility project. In doing so, the process control system for the entire barrier well system would be installed by a single subcontractor making the implementation and integration of the process control system easier. This work was originally included as a separate bid item in the Barrier Facility project and would be paid for solely by OCWD. The engineer's estimate for the Groundwater Replenishment (GW R) System Barrier Facilities work was estimated at $12,100,000 and upgrades to the OCWD process control system for their existing twenty-three barrier wells was estimated at$1,000,000 for a total engineer's estimate of$13,100,000. Through an addendum to the Barrier Facility project, the process control system work was removed and included with the Advanced Water Treatment Facilities contract. Since the barrier well control and the treatment plant control systems need to work seamlessly together, this change would allow one subcontractor to install the entire process control system for all barrier wells and the treatment plant assuring the smooth integration of barrier wells control with the treatment plant control system. This work reduced the original engineer's estimate of $13,100,000 reported to the GWR System Steering Committee by $1,000,000 to a revised estimate of$12,100,000. The low bid received was $12,621,053. This bid includes a cost reimbursable bid item for the City of Huntington Beach of $174,118 for some street work that was carried in this contract and not included in the engineer's estimate. The adjusted Barrier Facilities work that will be cost shared is valued at $12,446,935, which is $346,935 (or 3%) above the engineer's estimate of$12,100,000. The Barrier Facilities construction budget is $12,446,935 based on the new program budget of$486,900,000 as amended in the previous Board action. This new budget includes a budget revision of$330,419 to increase the budget to $12,446,935 for the Barrier Facilities. The breakdown of total construction costs between the separate contracts is shown in the following table. H:Wepf gw&\Bo Agent RepaM B Wd Pg RWM�Ul6m 151c1.GWR5 A—ld BeNa.Wc R.W: ggrovog Page 3 Summary of Current Construction Budgetary Costs by Contract ID Contract Current Contract Coat at No. Budget Award Completion 1 Theo Lacy Pipeline Reach GWR Portion $ 1,430,000 $ 1,430,000 $ 1,430,000 2 GWR Pipeline— Reach 1 26,673,000 26,672,045 3 GWR Pipeline— Reach 2 16 084,005 16,084,005 4 GWR Pipeline— Reach 3 16,989,000 16,989,000 5 Temp MF/SIte work/Site Power 17,139,646 17139,646 6 Southeast Barrier Pipeline 3,773,561 3,381 000 3,773,561 7 1 West End Bamer Pipeline 264,762 1 264,762 8 Advanced Water Treatment Facility 290,800,066 1 292,060,066 9 SCE Work for Permanent Substation 2,396,0001 2,396,000 2,396,000 10 Barrier Well Drilling/Monitoring 12,446,935 12,621,053 Wells/Wellhead Facilides/Pipolines 11 GWR Team Temp Officeslrrailers 807,000 783,990 807,000 12 Southern California Water Co. Well 1,635,000 13 Vendor Design Submittals for MF and 861,526 750,000 861,526 UV 14 Emerson Process Control System 2,793,363 2,793,363 15 Integrated Information System 4,860,000 16 Owner Controlled Insurance Program 7,2 937 7,384,937 17 Warehouse Equipment 250,000 Current Construction Total $406,589,801 5400 749 867 $9,268,087 The cost breakdown for the final design and construction phases of the Groundwater Replenishment System (GW RS) budget to be cost shared is: Construction: $406,590,000 Engineering, Legal Administration: $ 60,226,000 Project Contingency: $ 20,084,000 Total: $486,900,000 The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Capital Budget is: GWRS Final Design and Construction Cost Shared Costs: $243,450,000 Preliminary Design and OCSD-only Costs: $ 8,210,000 Total Capital Costs to OCSD $251,660,000 Grants $ (45,000,000) Net Costs after Grants $206,660,000 ALTERNATIVES No recommended alternatives exist other than awarding to the lowest bidder. H bBpNYaMe�dF .e Rspo�B P n.PppbWMN.m IN.)GWn AwW PamaMc a..a.a:mo+w Page 4 CEOA FINDINGS The Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS)for the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System was certified by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Board of Directors on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001. Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002, and by OCW D on January 16, 2002. Addendum No. 3 was approved by OCSD on March 24, 2004 and by the GWR System Steering Committee on December 1, 2003. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Agenda Item Submittal to the GWR System Steering Committee re: Award of Contract No. GWRS-2003-3, Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Facilities WS:Ic H.+aepfepm,EaVouO npeMa BOVar6` 1Bond Og Hapab' NVw I%C).BWn Aw BeMer.Eec oaoam� Page 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT(GWR) SYSTEM JOB NO.J-36 PROPOSED ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED.:. BUDGET PflOJECTIPHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPEHD�ED INCREASE F BUDGET BUDGET /DECREASE BUDGET DATE REOUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE DA "E Phase I -Project Develoment $ 700," $ 11.000 $ 11.000 $ 11,OW $ 11,W0 $ 10,000 91% Phasa2-Pmlimina Desi n $ 3,321 W0 $ 3,321.000 $ 3.321,000 $ - $ 3,321,000 $ 3,317,0W 100% Phase 3-Design $ 9.849.000 $ 17,170,0W $ 17,170.000 $ 17,170,0D0 $ 17,170.000 $ 14,900,000 87% Phase 4-Construction $ 98,401,000 $ 218,010,W0 $ 216,010,000 <" $ 20.410,396 $ 891082] $ 214,720,923 $ 9,500,000 4% Phase 5-Commissioning $ 9n,000 $ 977,OW '"'. $ - $ 0% Phase 6-Close-Out $ 171,00) $ 171,OW $ - $ 0% Phase 7.ComingenW $ 12,895,OW $ 12000000 $ 12000000 �i; $ 0% PROJECTTOTAL $ 121.925= $ 251,660,000 $ - $ 251,6W,OW :7" $ 228,912.396 $ 6,310,527 $ 235,222,923 $ 27.727,000 12% Reimbursable Costs $ 45.OW,000 1 $ 45,000=0 -;. $ 45,0W,000 1 $ 87,059 $ 45.087.059 1 $ 6,344,000 14% PROJECT NET $ 121,925,OW $ 191,206,000 $ - $ 206,660,OW li&. $ 183,912,396 $ 6,223,468 1 $ 190,136864 $ 21,383.000 11% PSA/Contract Design PSA $ 16,377,552 $ 16,377,552 +7 $ 15,387,552 $ -. - $ 15.387.552 $ 14567.320 95% Construction Menangement f Services PSA 6760283 $ 6,760283 aa. $ 6445,283 - $ 6445283 $ 1582,638 25% Constmdlon Contmd $ 203,294,991 $ - $ 203284,901 $ 193,697,953 $ 8310 $ 2W,006,980 $ 13,388]49 7% H:WepN9mft1 dAW&ft,,ft NB dAgeb Rem W4MNem 15(c).1 a, AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: April 12, 2004 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCW D/OCSD/Grants To: Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 501-5049-722.60-01 System Steering Committee Cost Estimate: $12,116,516 From: Virginia Grebbien General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEOA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Anthony Manzano Subject: AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. GWRS-2003-3, GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM BARRIER FACILITIES PROJECT SUMMARY Three bids for Contract No. GW RS-2003-3, Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Facilities Project, were received and opened on March 25, 2004. Following evaluation of the bids, staff recommends awarding the contract to the lowest responsive bidder, Layne Christensen Company, for the bid amount of $12,621,053. The bid contained a cost reimbursable bid item from the City of Huntington Beach of$174,118 for street work on Ellis that is included in this contract. The adjusted GW R System work is valued at $12,446,935, which is 2.7% over the Engineer's Estimate. RECOMMENDATION Agendize for the April 21 OCW D and April 28 OCSD Board meetings: 1) Receive and file Affidavit of Publication of Notice Inviting Bids; 2) Ratify issuance of Addenda Nos. 1 -7; and 3) Accept bid and award Contract No. GWRS-2003-3, Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Facilities Project, to the lowest responsive bidder, Layne Christensen Company, for$12,621,053. DISCUSSIOWANALYSIS In December 2003, the GWR System Steering Committee approved plans and specifications and authorized solicitation of bids for the Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Facilities Project. The work includes construction of injection wells, "nested" monitoring wells, pipelines, electrical, mechanical and instrumentation, including an extensive upgrade of the existing Process Control System (PCS). This includes 2,200 linear feet of 30-inch pipeline, 2,200 linear feet of (twin 2-inch and single 4-inch) PVC conduits, and 8 pre-cast concrete pull boxes for communication and power i facilities. Also included is 2,250 linear feet of an 18-inch storm drain, a concrete junction box, and a connection to an existing 24-inch storm drain. There are 16 injection wells at 8 well sites and associated civil and site work including well heads, mechanical equipment, piping, fittings, miscellaneous appurtenances, electrical and instrumentation facilities; also 4 "nested" monitoring wells at 4 additional sites with associated civil and site work. The Notice Inviting Bids was published on December 1, 2003, and seven addenda were issued on December 5, 2003, January 19, 2004, February 2, 2004, February 12, 2004, February 26, 2004, March 5, 2004, and March 18, 2004, which provided clarifications to the plans and specifications. Bids were opened on March 25, 2004, and a total of three bids were received. The companies that submitted bids and their respective bid amounts were as follows: Layne Christensen Company $ 12,621,053 Bakersfield Well and Pump $ 15,464,686 Beylik Drilling, Inc. $ 16,700,000 Staff has evaluated the bid of Layne Christensen Company and found it to be complete and responsive. Layne Christensen Company has the appropriate State contractor's license, which is current and in good standing. References have also been checked and found acceptable. The bid contained a cost reimbursable bid item from the City of Huntington Beach of $174,118 for street work on Ellis that is included in this contract. The adjusted GW R System work is valued at$12,446,935, which is 2.7% over the Engineer's Estimate. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS December 1, 2003-Approval of plans and specifications and solicitation of bids. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Dale I To ad.of Dir. a/ze/D4 1 AGENDA REPORT Item Number Item Number t5(a Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Associate Engineer III SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36, GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM BARRIER FACILITIES GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Authorize award of a construction contract by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to Layne Christensen Company, for construction of Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System Barrier Facilities, Contract No. GW RS-2003-3, for an amount not to exceed $12,621,053, with OCWD and Orange County Sanitation District paying equal shares of$6,310,526.50. SUMMARY • In December 2003, the GWR System Steering Committee approved the plans and specifications for the GWR System Barrier Facilities. The engineer's estimate is $12,100,000 • This project involves drilling and installing eight injection wells and installing approximately 1,200 linear feet of 36-inch in Ellis Avenue between Newland Street and Beach Boulevard. • Six bids were received on March 25, 2004. Summary information on the budget and bids are as follows: Project Budget (GWR System) $ 453,900,000 Construction Budget (Barrier Facilities) $ 12,446,935 Engineer's Estimate $ 12,100,000 Low Bid $ 12,621,053 High Bid $ 16,700,000 Number of Bids 6 Adjusted Bid to be cost shared $ 12,446,935 • The contract includes a reimbursable bid item from the City of Huntington Beach valued at $174,118. Therefore, the adjusted bid is $12,446,935 for GWR System work. • A tabulation of the three bids is included in the attached Agenda Item Submittal from the April 12, 2004, GWR System Steering Committee meeting. MWeprraBendar and Agenda Repordagb Mand Agenda RepanSWNYMm,Srcr.OWRS Award Sarrrernc RBnXd. Ofi . Page 1 • On April 12, 2004, the GWR System Steering Committee recommended awarding the contract to the lowest responsive bidder, Layne Christensen Company the bid amount of $12,621,053. PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System Steering Committee approved the Plans and Specifications for the Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Facilities on December 1, 2003. A Final Design and Construction Program Budget amendment and Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) budget amendment approval is recommended in a previous action at this April 28, 2004 Board meeting. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY See the attached Budget Information Table. The value of the contract awarded with this action to be cost shared is $12,621,053, with Orange County Water District (OCWD) and OCSD paying equal shares of $6,310,526.50. Authorization of $6,310,526.50 for construction is being requested for a total construction phase authorization of$214,720,923. The contract includes a reimbursable bid item from the City of Huntington Beach valued at $174,118. Therefore, the adjusted bid is $12,446,935 for GWR System work. The final amount to be cost shared after reimbursement by the City of Huntington Beach is $6,223,467.50. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: section s, Page 139, revised 04/28/04) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are Insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) With the budget amendment in the previous Board action for the GWR System, no change to the project budget is being requested as shown on the attached Budget Information Table. The Barrier Facilities construction budget is $12,446,935 based on the new program budget of$486,900,000 as amended in the previous Board action. This new budget included a budget revision of $330,419 to increase the budget to $12,446,935 for the Barrier Facilities. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Barrier Facilities contract consists of drilling injection wells at eight sites, installing wellhead facilities at those injection well sites, and extending the west barrier pipeline. Four new injection wells will be drilled and cased, generally along Ellis Avenue between M W.y,NB.ne6\Rome FBenen Peoon¢@ow aon,e BBeneo P¢yNN¢Wv,em,961.BwRs nwnre Bnnl¢raoc e.m.<d Bemmoo Page 2 Newland Street and Beach Boulevard in Huntington Beach. The remaining four new injection wells would be drilled and cased generally along the west bank of the Santa Ana River, just north of Adams Avenue in Huntington Beach. At each well site, wellhead facilities consisting of drop piping, above ground piping, valves, and site appurtenances, including the process control system, will be constructed. The barrier pipeline for the wells would consist of approximately 1,200 linear feet of 36-inch diameter pipe that would extend from Newland Street to Beach Boulevard on Ellis Avenue. Orange County Water District (OCWD) developed a project to upgrade the process control system for their existing twenty-three barrier wells, which they requested be combined with the Barrier Facility project. In doing so,the process control system for the entire barrier well system would be installed by a single subcontractor making the implementation and integration of the process control system easier. This work was originally included as a separate bid item in the Barrier Facility project and would be paid for solely by OCWD. The engineer's estimate for the Groundwater Replenishment (GW R) System Barrier Facilities work was estimated at$12,100,000 and upgrades to the OCWD process control system for their existing twenty-three barrier wells was estimated at$1,000,000 for a total engineer's estimate of$13,100,000. Through an addendum to the Barrier Facility project, the process control system work was removed and included with the Advanced Water Treatment Facilities contract. Since the barrier well control and the treatment plant control systems need to work seamlessly together, this change would allow one subcontractor to install the entire process control system for all barrier wells and the treatment plant assuring the smooth integration of barrier wells control with the treatment plant control system. This work reduced the original engineer's estimate of$13,100,000 reported to the GW R System Steering Committee by$1,000,000 to a revised estimate of $12,100,000. The low bid received was $12,621,053. This bid includes a cost reimbursable bid item for the City of Huntington Beach of$174,118 for some street work that was carried in this contract and not included in the engineer's estimate. The adjusted Barrier Facilities work that will be cost shared is valued at $12,446,935, which is$346,935 (or 3%) above the engineers estimate of$12,100,000. The Barrier Facilities construction budget is $12,446,935 based on the new program budget of$486,900,000 as amended in the previous Board action. This new budget includes a budget revision of$330,419 to increase the budget to $12,446,935 for the Barrier Facilities. The breakdown of total construction costs between the separate contracts is shown in the following table. N NpYagmOalBomE PgenUa Repo,IR:lM18D9N PpOny RpyM1stliWVMm INCI GWNS PwaN Bamer.hc ReNyG:�a;m Page 3 r Summary of Current Construction Budgetary Costs by Contract ` ID Contract Current Contract Cost at No. Budget Award Completion 1 Theo Lacy Pipeline Reach, GWR Portion $ 1,430,000 $ 1,430,000 $ 1,430 000 2 GWR Pipeline— Reach 1 26,673,000 26,672,045 3 GWR Pipeline— Reach 2 16,084 005 16,084,005 4 GWR Pipeline— Reach 3 16 989,000 16 989,000 5 Temp MF/Site work/Site Power 17,139,646 17,139,646 6 Southeast Barrier Pipeline 3,773,561 3,381,000 3,773,561 7 1 West End Barrier Pipeline 264,762 264,762 8 Advanced Water Treatment Facility 290,800,066 292,060,066 9 SCE Work for Permanent Substation 2,396,000 2 396,000 2,396 000 10 Barrier Well Drilling/Monitoring 12,446,935 12,621,053 Wells/Wellhead Facilities/Pipelines 11 GWR Team Temp Offices/Trailers 807,000 783,990 807.000 12 Southern Califomia Water Co. Well 1,635,000 13 Vendor Design Submittals for MF and 861,526 750,000 861,526 UV 14 1 Emerson Process Control System 2,793,363 2,793,363 15 Inte ted Information S em 4,860,000 16 Owner Controlled Insurance Program 7,385,937 7,384 937 17 Warehouse Equipment 250,000 Current Construction Total $406,589,801 $400,749,867 $9,268,087 The cost breakdown for the final design and construction phases of the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) budget to be cost shared is: Construction: $406,590,000 Engineering, Legal Administration: $ 60,226,000 Project Contingency: $ 20,084,000 Total: $486,900,000 The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Capital Budget is: GWRS Final Design and Construction Cost Shared Costs: $243,450,000 Preliminary Design and OCSD-only Costs: $ 8,210,000 Total Capital Costs to OCSD $251,660,000 Grants $ (45,000,000) Net Costs after Grants $ 206,660,000 ALTERNATIVES No recommended alternatives exist other than awarding to the lowest bidder. N:WpNgntleBperE Aps,gs ROWM2W1 BoeN PpaMa ReyNV110iVIBm tytl GWR$RwBb Be„Ier.M[ w„,w: oew,m Page 4 CEQA FINDINGS ! The Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS)for the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System was certified by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Board of Directors on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001. Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002, and by OCW D on January 16, 2002. Addendum No. 3 was approved by OCSD on March 24, 2004 and by the GWR System Steering Committee on December 1, 2003. ATTACHMENTS 1. Budget Information Table 2. Agenda Item Submittal to the GWR System Steering Committee re: Award of Contract No. GWRS-2003-3, Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Facilities WS:lc Hv pMga aaene nyema Reomwzooa ewm,yenaa AapaHamaaawem.s(c�.Gwns nnm a me..aeo e«i.ea: Ow 3 Page 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT(GWR) SYSTEM JOB NO.J-36 PROPOSED ORIGINAL, CURRENT ,PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSEESTIMATED ESTIMATED., BUDGET PRDJEVTIPHASE; A6n4ORQEb; PROJECT IRCREISE REVISED p AUTkORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAE E%PERDEOTaI `EUDGEi ' BUOOET ../DECREASE SUDGET 'DATE REQUEST AUTHORD' IJ 'Vii Phase 1-P 'ect Develo ment $ 700,000 $ 11,000 $ 11.000 $ 11,000 $ 100 91% Phase 2-Prelimine Desi n $ 3,321,000 $ 3,321,000 $ 3,321,000 $ - $ 3,3200 100% Phase 3-Design $ 9,849.000 $ 17.170.000 $ 17,170,000 ' $ 17,170.000 $ 17.170.000 $ 14,900,000 87% Phase 4-Construction $ 96,481.000 $ 218.010,000 $ 218,010,000 $ 208,410.396 $ 8370627 $ 214,720,923 $ 9,500,000 4% Phase 5-Commissioning $ 977,IXD $ 9T,000 $ - $ 0% Phase 6-Close-Out $ 171,000 $ 171,000 $ - $ 0% Phase 7.Cuffllhqency $ 12,895,000 $ 12,=,M $ 12,000.000 $ 0% PROJECT TOTAL It 121,925.000 $ 251,660,000 $ - $ 251,660,000 6 $ 228.912,396 $ 6,310,527 $ 235,222.923 $ 27,727,000 12% Reimbursable Costs $ 45,000.000 1 $ 45,000,000 1 $ 45.000,000 1$ 87,058 $ 45,087,059 1 $ 6,399.000 1 14-1 PROJECT NET 1 $ 121,925,000 1 $ 191,206.000 $ - $ 206,660,W0 1 1 $ 183.912,398 1 $ 6,223,468 $ 190.135,864 1 $ 21,383,000 11% PSA/Contract Design PSA $ 16,3A,552 $ 16,377,552 $ 15,387,552 $ - $ 15.387,552 $ 14.567,320 95% Construction Manangement Services PSA $ 6,960,283 $ 6,960,283 -+ $ 6,445,283 $ - $ 6,445,283 It 1.582,638 25% Constvction Conned $ 203,204,901 $ - $ 203,294.901 $ 193.697.953 $ 6,310.527 $ 200=,480 $ 13.388,749 7% H:bapN49eMerBoem A,nOa Reeoft2 eoem AgeMe R.,Mm NN 151ci.1 ' AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL Meeting Date: April 12, 2004 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 501-5049-722.60-01 System Steering Committee Cost Estimate: $12,116,516 From: Virginia Grebbien General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CECIA Compliance: Yes Staff Contact: Anthony Manzano Subject: AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. GWRS-2003-3, GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM BARRIER FACILITIES PROJECT SUMMARY Three bids for Contract No. GWRS-2003-3, Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Facilities Project, were received and opened on March 25, 2004. Following evaluation of the bids, staff recommends awarding the contract to the lowest responsive bidder, Layne Christensen Company, for the bid amount of$12,621,053. The bid contained a cost reimbursable bid item from the City of Huntington Beach of$174,118 for street work on Ellis that is included in this contract. The adjusted GW R System work is valued at $12,446,935, which is 2.7% over the Engineer's Estimate. RECOMMENDATION Agendize for the April 21 OCW D and April 28 OCSD Board meetings: 1) Receive and file Affidavit of Publication of Notice Inviting Bids; 2) Ratify issuance of Addenda Nos. 1 -7; and 3) Accept bid and award Contract No. GWRS-2003-3, Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Facilities Project, to the lowest responsive bidder, Layne Christensen Company, for$12,621,053. DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS In December 2003, the GW R System Steering Committee approved plans and specifications and authorized solicitation of bids for the Groundwater Replenishment System Barrier Facilities Project. The work includes construction of injection wells, "nested" monitoring wells, pipelines, electrical, mechanical and instrumentation, including an extensive upgrade of the existing Process Control System (PCS). This includes 2,200 linear feet of 30-inch pipeline, 2,200 linear feet of (twin 2-inch and single 4-inch) PVC conduits, and 8 pre-cast concrete pull boxes for communication and power facilities. Also included is 2,250 linear feet of an 18-inch storm drain, a concrete junction box, and a connection to an existing 24-inch storm drain. There are 16 injection wells at 8 well sites and associated civil and site work including well heads, mechanical equipment, piping, fittings, miscellaneous appurtenances, electrical and instrumentation facilities; also 4 "nested" monitoring wells at 4 additional sites with associated civil and site work. The Notice Inviting Bids was published on December 1, 2003, and seven addenda were issued on December 5, 2003, January 19, 2004, February 2, 2004, February 12, 2004, February 26, 2004, March 5, 2004, and March 18, 2004, which provided clarifications to the plans and specifications. Bids were opened on March 25, 2004, and a total of three bids were received. The companies that submitted bids and their respective bid amounts were as follows: Layne Christensen Company $ 12,621,053 Bakersfield Well and Pump $ 15,464,686 Beylik Drilling, Inc. $ 16,700,000 Staff has evaluated the bid of Layne Christensen Company and found it to be complete and responsive. Layne Christensen Company has the appropriate State contractor's license, which is current and in good standing. References have also been checked and found acceptable. The bid contained a cost reimbursable bid item from the City of Huntington Beach of $174,118 for street work on Ellis that is included in this contract. The adjusted GW R System work is valued at $12,446,935, which is 2.7% over the Engineer's Estimate. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS December 1, 2003 - Approval of plans and specifications and solicitation of bids. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Meeting Date To 8d.of Dir. 4/28/D4 J' AGENDA REPORT Iem Numbe Iem Numbe 16 Orange County Sanitation District FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Jim Herberg, Engineering Manager SUBJECT: FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT, JOB NO. P2-66 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION Consideration of the following actions regarding environmental documentation required to approve Treatment Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement, Job No. P2-66, project: (1) Receive and file Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Treatment Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement Project, dated April 2004, prepared by Environmental Science Associates (ESA); and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 04-10, Certifying the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for Implementation of the Treatment Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement Project, Job No. P2-66; Making Certain Findings Relating to Environmental Effects identified in the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report; Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and Adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations SUMMARY • The 1999 Strategic Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Strategic Plan (PEIR) recommended improvements to the existing headworks facilities that included upgrades to the existing headworks. However, a subsequent engineering evaluation of the facility showed that it was less costly and more practical to construct new headworks than to continue to upgrade the existing headworks after 40 years of expansions and modifications. • Orange County Sanitation District (District) staff proposes to modify the program evaluated in the PEIR as it relates to the improvements to Treatment Plant No. 2 by: (1) construction of new headworks facilities to replace the existing structures; and (2) installation of new odor control facilities that would utilize a new bio-tower scrubbing technology. • Environmental Science Associates (ESA) has prepared a Subsequent EIR for Treatment Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement Project. A Subsequent EIR was required due to the substantial changes to the previously considered improvements at Plant No. 2. These changes required major revisions to several sections of the previous PEIR to make the PEIR adequately apply to the Headworks Replacement Project. R..1W. a Page 1 • District staff has received and responded to a comment letter on the Draft Subsequent EIR from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The letter raises concerns about significant and unavoidable impacts on air quality during construction. The letter and the District's response are found in the Final Subsequent EIR. • The project would result in a significant and unavoidable air quality impact during construction. Specifically, project construction equipment and haul trucks would emit nitrogen oxides (NOx) in excess of daily significance thresholds established by the SCAQMD. District staff recommends that the Board consider this project impact acceptable in light of the overall project benefits. A Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared to identify the project benefits that outweigh the project's significant and unavoidable air quality impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations is attached as Attachment B to the resolution included as part of the Project Findings for adoption by the Board of Directors. PRIOR COMMITTEEBOARD ACTIONS The Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR)for Treatment Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement Project, Job No. P2-66, was presented to the Planning, Design, and Construction (PDC) Committee on April 6, 2004 as an Information Only Item. PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY No budgetary action is being requested. BUDGETIMPACT ® This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Miscellaneous 8 Support Projects, Supplement No. 1 to the 1999 Strategic Plan EIR, Section 8, Page 123) ❑ This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. ❑ This item has not been budgeted. ❑ Not applicable (information item) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • The 1999 PEIR identifies several feasible measures to reduce NOx emission impacts. A Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program (MMRP) has been developed for the Subsequent EIR to include the applicable mitigation measure developed for the Program EIR and new feasible measures developed as part of the Subsequent EIR process. Although, these mitigation measures will reduce NOx emission, the project impact will remain as a significant and unavoidable. • The proposed project would replace the existing headworks at Treatment Plant No. 2 that currently receives wastewater flow from five major trunk sewers within the District's service area. The new Headworks facility would provide the point of entry for these trunk sewers, measuring their flow and providing preliminary treatment (grit and debris removal). The new Headworks would have 340 million gallons per day Row. � Page 2 (mgd) peak wet weather flow capacity and would not increase the existing treatment capacity of Plant No. 2. • The District will construct 15 separate structures. The design of the new buildings would be similar to the character and height of the surrounding facilities. The tallest of the new Headworks facilities will be 56 feet tall. As part of the ancillary buildings, an odor control system would also be constructed adjacent to the main Headworks structure to utilize the new bio-tower scrubbing technology, followed by conventional treatment of chemical scrubbers. • Project construction will occur entirely within the 30-acre site located In the central portion of District's Treatment Plant No. 2. This area currently accommodates, the existing sludge drying beds, headworks B & C, two underground storage tanks, and a truck washing facility. These facilities will be demolished and removed as part of this project. The road network and parking area on the affected portion of Plant No. 2 will also be modified. • In May 2003, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for Treatment Plant No. 2 Headworks Replacement Project was circulated for public review. The NOP was mailed to responsible agencies, organizations, and all individuals that expressed an interest in the project. The NOP requested that interested parties respond within 30 days with written comments and concerns related to the proposed project. The NOP comment period was established as May 12 through June 12, 2003. Ten written comments were received. All written comments received were considered during the development of the Draft Subsequent EIR. • The Draft Subsequent EIR was released for public circulation in January 2004. The 45-day public review period was established as January 23 through March 9, 2004. The Draft EIR was mailed to responsible agencies, organizations, and all individuals that expressed an interest in the project. Approximately 115 Draft Subsequent EIRs and 25 Notice of Availability letters were mailed. Additionally, the Notice of Availability, which directs the public to the District's website for viewing the Draft EIR, was advertised in the Orange County Register. A copy of the Draft EIR was also mailed to the District's Board of Directors on March 25, 2004. • The District received a total of eight comment letters on the Draft Subsequent EIR from the Cities of Fullerton, Anaheim, and Fountain Valley, and Southern California Association of Governments, Costa Mesa Sanitary District, Irvine Ranch Water District, Southern California Gas Company, and South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Seven comment letters acknowledged the project, but did not raise environmental concerns about the project. The comment letter received from SCAQMD raised concern about significant and unavoidable impacts on air quality during construction. In accordance with CEQA, District staff prepared responses to all comments received on the Draft SEIR and these responses are included in the Final SEIR. • The Final SEIR was circulated for a 10-day public review period, from April 6, through April 16, 2004 to those agencies/individuals who commented on the Draft Subsequent EIR, including SCAQMD. A public notice of the Final SEIR was filed with R,...a:oa M Page 3 the County of Orange on April 6, 2004 and published in the Orange County Register on April 13, 2004. As of this writing, no comments have been received. In the event, r comments are received on the Final EIR, they will be reported at the District's Board of Directors meeting on April 28, 2004. • While CEQA does not require public review of the Final SEIR, the Final SEIR will be made available as a courtesy to the public ten days prior to the April 28, 2004 Board hearing. The Final SEIR (which includes the District's response to comments) will also be circulated to each commenting agency to satisfy CEQA's requirement that the lead agency provide a written response to agencies that commented on the Draft SEIR ten days prior to the certification hearing. The Board of Directors received the Draft and Final Subsequent EIR, by separate letters mailed on March 25, and April 13, respectively. If a Director needs an additional copy of either the Draft or Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), please contact Jim Herberg at 714-593-7310. ALTERNATIVES • Under the 1999 PEIR Project Altemative, the District would proceed with upgrading the existing Headworks, as identified in the PEIR. The PEIR Alternative would not eliminate the risk of mechanical failures associated with aging equipment and structures or provide the greatest protection from seismic hazards. The existing headworks structures are located directly on a strike-slip fault. An earthquake on this fault would shear and damage these structures. Therefore, the risk of serious damage from an earthquake would remain high for these existing facilities. Rehabilitation would require a more complex construction sequence while providing the same level of preliminary treatment (grit and debris removal), disrupt more plant operations, have greater seismic risk, and would ultimately be more costly due to the limitations of the existing facilities. Thus, the rehabilitation of the headworks could not be done economically or provide the long-tens benefits of an entirely new system. • The No Project Alternative would result in no action being taken to refurbish the existing Headworks. As the existing equipment ages, the possibility of sewage spills and fugitive odor release would increase. These facilities would not comply with current seismic and electrical codes or address the increased risk to worker safety hazards. The 40-year old facility would continue to be at increased risk of mechanical failure associated with the existing aging equipment. CEGA FINDINGS In accordance with CEQA, District Staff has prepared Findings of Fact, which are attached as Attachment A to the approval resolution. District staff has also prepared a Statement of Overriding Considerations, attached as Attachment B to the approval resolution, in light of the project's short term significant and unavoidable NOx or air quality impact during the construction period. ww.a , Page 4 ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. OCSD 04-10 2. Attachment A, Findings of Fact 3. Attachment B, Statement of Overriding Considerations 4. Attachment C, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program AA:sa H:Mt910b 1\Agenda Draft RepodWoint Boarde\P268 Final EIR Certification Agenda Report 042804.doc n.m..a: owaro3 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO.OCSD 04-10 CERTIFYING THE FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TREATMENT PLANT NO.2 HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT PROJECT,JOB NO.P2.66;MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATING TO ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT;ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM;AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS. WHEREAS,the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD), hereinafter referred to as"Board",is presently considering the approval of a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(SEIR)augmenting the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report(PEIR),a Master Plan for new facilities through the year 2020; and, WHEREAS,on October 27, 1999,the Board adopted a Final Program EIR for the Strategic Plan("PEIR"),which identified individual projects at Treatment Plant Nos. 1 and 2 that would be needed to accommodate the projected population growth in its service area through 2020;and, WHEREAS,the PEIR identified as pan of the program the need for certain improvements at Treatment Plant No.2 including upgrades to the existing headworks pumping and screening facility,and construction of three new grit chambers to improve the wastewater processes of the existing influent sampling system;and, WHEREAS,the District proposes to modify the program evaluated in the PEIR as it relates to improvements to Treatment Plant No.2 by(1)constructing new headworks facilities to replace the existing structures,which receives wastewater from five major trunk sewers within the District's service area,and(2)installing new odor control facilities that would utilize a new bio- tower scrubbing technology("Headworks Replacement Project"), WHEREAS,the District is the lead agency for the Headworks Replacement Project, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970(CEQA),as amended,the State of California CEQA Guidelines and District CEQA procedures;and, WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines 15162,District staff determined that a subsequent EIR(SEIR) was required for the Headworks Replacement Project due to the substantial changes to previously contemplated improvements at Plant No.2. These changes required major revisions to several sections of the previous PEIR to make the PEIR adequately apply to the Headworks Replacement Project. WHEREAS,District Staff has consulted with other public agencies and the general public, giving them an opportunity to comment on the Draft SEIR as required by CEQA;and, RESOLUTION t r WHEREAS,the Board has objectively evaluated the comments from public agencies and persons who reviewed the Draft SEIR;and, WHEREAS, the comments and recommendations received on the Draft SEIR,either in full or in summary,together with the District Staff s responses to significant environmental concerns raised in the review and consultation process,have been included in the Final SEER; and, WHEREAS,District Staff presented to the Board the PEIR and the Final SEIR consisting of the Draft SEIR,list of comments on the Draft SEIR,and responses to the comments received on the Draft SEIR for review and consideration prior to the final approval of,and commitment to, the project. NOW.THEREFORE,the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE,DETERMINE AND ORDER: I. That the Board of Directors hereby certifies that the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(FSEIR)has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines and that the Board of Directors has reviewed and considered the information contained in the PEIR as revised by the FSEIR prior to approval of,or commitment to,the project and that the FSEIR,consisting of the Draft SEIR and the Response to Comments,reflects the District's independent judgment and analysis;and, 2. The Board finds that changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into, the proposed project,which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of the project and adopts the Findings of Fact as described in Attachment A; and. 3. The Board adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations as described in Attachment B. 4. The District will implement the mitigation measures recommended in the earlier PEIR and referenced on the FSEIR and the new mitigation measures recommended in the FSEIR to reduce the significant impacts of the project to a less than significant level. 5. The Board adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program as described in Attachment C to ensure that all mitigation measures are implemented;and, 6. The Board authorizes and directs the Board Secretary to file the Notice of Determination and any other documents in accordance with the requirements of CEQA and the District's CEQA procedures. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 28,2004. V RESOUMON Chair ATTEST: Board Se tary EDMS No.OW76a676 1 ATTACm11EW A L FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SEIR) FOR THE PROJECT The Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(SEIR),prepared pursuant to Section 15089 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)Guidelines,consists of one volume including the Draft SEIR,comment letters received on the Draft SEIR, and the Response to Comments (responses to those comments). H. THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD CONTENTS OF THE RECORD The following information is incorporated by reference and made pan of the record supporting these findings and the actions taken by the District in certifying the Final SEIR and approving the project: 1. The Final Subsequent EIR and all documents relied upon or incorporated by reference in the Final Subsequent EIR. 2. The Final Program EIR for the 1999 Strategic Plan and all documents relied upon or incorporated by reference in the Final Program EIR,including the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan. 3. All testimony,documentary evidence and all correspondence submitted to or delivered to the District in connection with the meetings and public hearings at which the Draft SEIR or Final SEIR was considered by the District. 4. All testimony,documentary evidence and all correspondence submitted to or delivered to any of the District's member districts in connection with the meetings, workshops and public hearings at which the Draft SEIR or Final SEIR was considered by the District's member districts. 5. All staff reports, memoranda, maps,slides,letters, minutes of meetings and other documents relied upon or prepared by District staff and consultants relating to the project. 6. Any other documents specified by Public Resources Code section 21167.6(e). LOCATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD The District is the custodian of the administrative record,including all CEQA documents and the other background documents and materials, which constitute the record of the proceedings upon which the District's Board decisions to certify the Final SEIR and approve the project are based. The administrative record is located at the District's administrative offices at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,California, 92708. OCSD IMM.w lGplocemem M.I SEIR I HAINHI B AWACINIENTA ' III. PURPOSE OF FINDINGS The Final SEIR,prepared in accordance with CEQA,evaluates the significant adverse environmental impacts that could result from the project. Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines requires that the public agency approving or carrying out the project shall make written findings for each significant impact identified in the SEIR,accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. These findings include one of the following: 1. Changes or alterations have been required to,or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as defined in the EIR. 2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. 3. Specific economic,legal,social,technological,or other considerations,including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers,make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. These findings accomplish the following: 1. They address the significant environmental effects identified in the SEIR for the approved Project. 2. They incorporate all mitigation measures associated with these significant impacts identified in either the Draft SEIR or Final SEIR. 3. They explain whether a significant effect is avoided or reduced by the adopted mitigation measures to a less than significant level,or remain significant and unavoidable,either because there are no feasible mitigation measures or because,even with implementation of mitigation measures,an impact would remain significant. The conclusions presented in these findings are based on the PEIR,the Final SEIR and other evidence in the record of proceedings. IV. EFFECT OF FINDINGS To the extent that these findings conclude that various proposed mitigation measures outlined in the Program EIR as modified by the Final SEIR are feasible and have not been modified, superseded,or withdrawn,the District hereby binds itself to implement these measures. These findings,in other words,are not merely information. The mitigation measures identified as feasible and within the District's authority to implement for the approved project are express conditions of approval which the District binds itself to upon adoption of this resolution and project approval. The Board will adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP")concurrently with these findings to ensure that the all mitigation measures will be implemented. The MMRP developed for the SEIR includes applicable mitigation measures from the MMRP developed for the Program EIR and any new feasible measures developed as part of the Subsequent EIR process. DCSD awEa Repr ..H.I SEIR 2 P AIVIIW ATTACHMENT A V. THE HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT PROJECT The District proposes to replace the headworks facilities at Treatment Plant No.2 located in the City of Huntington Beach. The headworks serve as the initial point of entry for all influent flow into Treatment Plant No. 2. Currently,the existing headworks consist of flow metering and diversion structures,pumps,bar screens,grit chambers and chemical addition facilities prior to priman'sedimentation. The proposed new headworks facilities will have a 340 mgd peak wet weather now capacity and will not increase the existing treatment capacity of Plant No.2. The existing power buildings(A and B)will have the majority of electrical equipment removed. These buildings will not be demolished,but will remain onsite and possibly used for storage in the future. The proposed Power Building E will include some of the electrical equipment contained in power buildings A and B with additional upgrades. The new headworks facilities will include the use of vortex grit basins instead of aerated grit basins and the addition of both screenings and grit handling equipment to increase the solid content of these materials prior to disposal in a landfill. Project construction will occur entirely within the property boundaries of the District's Treatment Plant No. '_. The District will construct fifteen separate structures. The design of the new buildings would be similar to the character and height of the surrounding facilities. The tallest of the new headworks facilities will be 56 feet tall. The project will occur within a 30-acre area located in the central portion of Plant No. 2. This area currently accommodates the existing sludge drying beds,headworks B and C,two underground storage tanks,and a truck wasbing facility. These facilities will be decommissioned and demolished as part of the project. The road network and parking area on the affected portion of Plant No.2 will also be modified. Construction activity will last approximately five years beginning in June 2005 and ending in June 2010.with approximately 1,050 days,or three years of actual construction work The new headworks and ancillary facilities will be fully constructed prior to the demolition of the existing facility. The on-site construction workforce will likely average about 35 to 45 workers per day over the course of the project. During peak construction activity,this number will range from approximately 100 to 150 workers. Construction will require excavation of approximately 175.000 cy of soil,75,000 cy of which will be disposed of offsite,requiring approximately 3.750 haul truck tips. The new headworks will utilize new odor control bio-tower technology,tested for the past two years by the District. The bio-towers will be approximately 48 feet tall and located adjacent to the main facility. The existing scrubbers and odor control facilities,currently used to treat the foul air from both the existing headworks and primary clarifiers,will be modified. In the future, the north scrubbers will only be used to treat foul air from the primary clarifiers and the new bio- towers will be totally dedicated to the new headworks. IKSD IkdmM:.,ReFlacmem Fwl SM 3 MAI'- IIO ATTACMIE"A VI. FINDINGS CONCERNING SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS AIR QUALITY A. Facts: 1. The Final SEIR analyzes potential air quality impacts in Section 3.2. As described in this section,project construction equipment and haul trucks would emit criteria pollutants that would exceed the significance thresholds set by the South Coast Air Quality Management District ('SCAQMD")for oxides of nitrogen(NO,). This impact is identified in the SEIR (see page 3- 15)as a significant and unavoidable impact of the project. 2. The 1999 PEIR identifies several feasible measures to reduce NO,emission impacts. These measures include regular maintenance of equipment engines,requiring trucks and vehicles in loading or unloading queues to shut off their engines when not in use,and discontinuing construction activities during second stage smog alerts(see mitigation measures 6.5-la and 6.5- lb). The EIR concludes,however,that this impact cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level. B. Findings: This Board finds that: 1. All mitigation measures identified in the 1999 PER to reduce NO,emissions are adopted and shall be implemented in accordance with the concurrently adopted MMRP. 2. This impact is overridden by project benefits as set forth in the statement of overriding considerations adopted concurrently herewith. VII. FINDINGS CONCERNING SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS REDUCED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVELS BY MITIGATION MEASURES INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT The Final SEIR identifies significant impacts that are reduced to a"less than significant' level by the inclusion in the project approval of the mitigation measures identified in the Final SEIR. Changes or alternations have been required in,or incorporated into, the project,which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the Final SEIR to a less than significant level. These changes and alterations are presented in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program,which the Board is adopting concurrently with these findings. AESTHETICS A. Facts 1. The SEIR discusses Aesthetic impacts in Section 3.1. According to the SEIR,the project would be visible from adjacent residential neighborhoods and Pacific Coast Highway(PCH). OCSD Hepdwpes Replxe..Fwl SEIR 4 MA1201168 ATTACHMENT A 1 The residential properties with views of the treatment plant are located in the cities of Huntington Beach to the northwest,Costa Mesa to the northeast,and Newport Beach to the southeast. 2. The SEER identifies mitigation measure M-3.1-1,which requires the contractor to replace damaged landscaping and restore the construction area near the property boundary to a condition similar to existing conditions. This will ensure that there will be an equally effective landscape buffer between the new headworks facilities and nearby residential neighborhoods and PCH. This mitigation measure will further ensure that the existing aesthetic quality and degree of visibility of the headworks site is maintained post-construction. B. Findings: This Board finds that: 1. The recommended mitigation measure in the SEIR is adopted as stated in paragraph 3 of the approval resolution. This measure will mitigate the aesthetic impact of any new structures to a less than significant level. AIR QUALITY A. Facts I. The Final SEIR concludes that although dust emissions would not exceed thresholds of significance,a mitigation measure to control fugitive dust during truck hauling operations would further substantially minimize fugitive dust emissions. 2. The Final SEIR identifies mitigation measure M-3.2-1,which requires soil removal contractors to cover all trucks hauling soil,and.and other loose materials,or maintain at least two feet of free board. B. Findings: This Board finds that: 1. The recommended mitigation measure in the SEER will be adopted as a precautionary measure to further reduce and assist in minimizing PMIO emissions to a less than significant level. A. Facts 1. The Final SEIR states that the proposed project is not anticipated to result in objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. As described in mitigation measure M-3.2.2,the District shall ensure that contractors immediately remove salvage/demolished equipment from Plant No.2 to minimize potential odors during the removal of existing facilities. Staging areas will not be used to store salvaged/demolished equipment. 2. In addition,the Final SEER identifies mitigation measure M-3.2-3 to ensure that the project would not emit offsite nuisance odors,the Contractor shall develop an odor mitigation plan (which could include draining and flushing equipment prior to demolition,application of hydrogen peroxide,etc)to be approved by District's Air Quality Division. OCSDHuAEW - Repa...M.)SEIR 5 ESAIM11M ATTACm,IENTA , B. Findings: This Board finds that: 1. The recommended mitigation measures in the SEIR are adopted as stated in paragraph 3 of the approval resolution. These measures will mitigate the temporary odors genemted during construction to a less than significant level. 2 The constriction of the new headworks odor control facility would substantially improve the existing odor control equipment. The new facilities are considered a beneficial impact of the project. GEOLOGY AND SOILS A. Facts I. A.described in Section 3.3 of the Final SEIR,the proposed headworks facilities project could expose people or structures to potential adverse effects due to rapture of a known earthquake fault,strong ground shaking,ground failure,including liquefaction and landslides due to seismic activity. To ensure that the project would not mull in significant seismic hazards,the Final SEIR commits the District to the following: a. To mitigate potential seismic impacts,the Final SEBt provides stringent requirements that apply to the construction of new facilities. The Final SEIR states that any new structures under the proposed project would be required to meet updated California Building Codes standard specific for the underlying geologic materials in order to ensure the safety of the structures and occupant. The SEIR also identifies speck mitigation measures from the 1999 PEIR to mitigate impacts: • Mitigation Measure 6.6-IB provide that the District will design and construct new facilities in accordance with District seismic standards and/or meet or exceed seismic design standards in the most recent edition of the California Building code. • Mitigation Measure 6.6-2A allows the District to implement the Spill Prevention Containment and Countermeasures Plan(SPCC). • Mitigation Measure 6.6-2B provide for OSCD chemical facilities to be designed with secondary containment,such as berms,to contain and divert toxic chemicals from wastewater Bows and isolate damaged facilities to reduce contamination risks. h. Under Mitigation Measure 3.1-1,the District will implement recommendations made in the geotechnical report as prepared by Converse Consultants,which includes,but is not limited to the following: • For construction near fault splays,additional excavation and backfrll with non- ohesive material on the base and sides of strictures may be required. MS11 W-W-A'Rep —.Fwl SEIR 6 ESAIx111" • ATTACHMENT • To accommodate potential ground movement caused by seismic event, pipes with flexible coupling should be considered. • Removal and recompaction of the upper fill soils to minimize the potential for differential settlement to affect structures on grade. • For critical structures,the use of mat foundation or reinforced perimeter footings with interior footings interconnected with grade beams for more rigidity to reduce the potential of seismically induced settlement or liquefaction. • Structures with basements should be supponed on mat foundations founded on native soils or compacted fill. • Groundwater should be lowered by dewatering to at least five feet below the lowest excavation level. Existing structures should be protected during dewatering. • Temporary construction slopes should be 1.5:1 or flatter for soils below groundwater level and 1:1 or flatter for soils above groundwater level. Surcharge loads should not be permitted within five feet or a distance equal to the depth of excavation,whichever is greater,unless the excavation is properly shored. • Temporary shoring will be required where open cut excavations will not be feasible and space limitations would not allow for minimum excavation slopes or because of nearby structures. B. Findings: This Board finds that: 1. All mitigation measures identified in the 1999 PEIR to reduce seismic hazards are adopted as stated in paragraph 3 of the approval resolution. These measures will mitigate geology and soils impacts to a less than significant level. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS A. Facts 1. The Final SEIR analyzes impacts relating to hazards and hazardous materials in Section 3A. As discussed in this section,contaminated soils could be encountered during underground storage tank removal or excavation for construction of the new structures. 2. To reduce potential impacts resulting from underground storage tank removal or excavation for construction purposes,the Final SEIR identifies mitigation measure M-3.4-1. which provides that any contaminated soils encountered on the project site during tank removal, site clearance,or excavation will be removed from the project site and disposed of off-site in accordance with hazardous waste regulations. The measure also provides that the District will notify the Orange County Health Care Agency of remedial actions. 3. To reduce the risk of exposure to hazards and hazardous materials during construction, the Final SEER identifies mitigation measure M-3.4-2, which requires that all structures to be demolished most be investigated for the presence of lead paint and/or asbestos containing material and precautions must be taken to ensure the safe removal and disposal of these materials. oCW nuEwaka Replaamew Fw SEIR 7 MAIM11M ATTAmNUM A 4. To reduce risk of potential fire or explosion hazard from disturb abandoned oil and gas wells during construction activities,the Final SEIR identifies mitigation measure M-3.4-3,which requires the District to comply with the requirements of the Division of Oil,Gas,and Geothermal Resources Construction Site Plan Review process. The Division will be notified if any previously unknown wells are discovered during construction. B. Findings: This Board finds that: 1. The recommended mitigation measures in the SEIR are adopted as stated in paragraph 3 of the approval resolution. These recommended measures will mitigate the risk of encountering hazardous materials during construction and excavation to a less than significant level. HYDROLOGY A. Facts 1. The Final SEIR analyzes hydrology and water quality impacts in Section 3.5. The Final SEIR concludes that the project would temporarily reduce the treatment capacity during the period when the new headworks is being connected into the system. This could result in violations of waste discharge requirements. 2 To mitigate potential violation of discharge requirements,the Final SEIR identifies two mitigation measures M-3.5-1 and M-3.5-2,which require OCSD to have in place the means of balancing influent between the two treatment plants to avoid exceeding effluent quality discharge limits prior to implementation of the connection phase of the new headworks and for OCSD to obtain an agreement with the Orange County Water District(OCWD)specifically stating that the Santa Ana River Interceptor(SARI)line may be diverted to Plant No. 1 during the 14-month headworks connection phase during certain peak wet weather events. The agreement shall include procedures to be followed by OCSD and OCWD during peak wet weather events such that the OCWD will discontinue production of recycled water for the Groundwater Replenishment System(GWRS)until the SARI line is removed from the source water of Reclamation Plant No. 1. B. Findings: This Board finds that: 1. The recommended mitigation measures in the SEIR as stated above are adopted as stated in paragraph 3 of the approval resolution. These measures will avoid exceeding effluent quality discharge limits as identified in the interim compliance plan set by SARWQCB and the EPA and will reduce potential water quality impacts to a less than significant level. A. Facts 1. The Final SEIR also concludes that ground disturbance activity during construction could add pollutants to storm water runoff. OCSD IbOvmke Repl.e .F ISEIR g ESA/91168 ATTACIDIEW A 2. To reduce potential water quality impacts from storm water during construction,the Final SEIR identifies specific mitigation measures from the 1999 PER to mitigate impacts. Mitigation Measure M-6.7-la requires the District to implement best management practices during construction. Mitigation Measure M-6.7-lb requires the District to conduct storm water pollution prevention training for construction workers. Mitigation measure M-6.7-Ic tequires the District to conduct on site storm drain inspections periodically. Mitigation measure M-6.7-ld requires that the District require contractors to prepare storm water pollution prevention plans. Mitigation measure M-6.7-le requires the District to comply with the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board(SARWQCB)best management practices. Mitigation measure M-6.7-2a requires that contractors comply with the District's dewatering specifications. Mitigation measure M-6.7- 2b requires that the dewatering activities comply with the general permit(CAG998001,Order No. R8-2003-OWI)for de minimis discharges including construction de-watering. B. Findings: This Board finds that: I. All mitigation measures identified in the 1999 PER to reduce storm water quality impacts are adopted as stated in paragraph 3 of the approval resolution. These measures will reduce water quality impacts relating to storm water runoff to a less than significant level. NOISE A. Facts 1. The Final SEIR identified potential noise impacts during construction of the new headworks and during operation of the new headworks facilities. Operational activities that may generate noise include pump noise and truck traffic associated with chemical delivery and grit and sludge removal. Moreover,construction noise may be generated by demolition,grading and earth moving activities,hauling materials,sheet piling for shoring excavations,and ultimate construction of the building structures. Construction noise levels would generally fluctuate depending on the type,number,and duration of construction equipment. These impacts, however,will be avoided or reduced to a less than significant level based on the following: a. For Operational activities,the Final SEIR identifies mitigation measure M-3.6.1, which provides that buildings housing noise generating equipment be insulated to meet fence-line noise standards. Mitigation Measure 6.4-2 of the PEER states that measures to meet this fence-line standard include: • Locating noise sources away from sensitive receptors, installation of acoustical enclosures around noise sources,installation of critical application silencers and sequential mufFlers for exhaust noise,installation of louvered vents,directing vent systems away from nearby residences,and constructing soundwalls at the property lines. b. The Final SEIR identifies Mitigation Measure M-3.6-2,which requires the construction contractor to comply with the city of Huntington Beach and Orange County noise standards. The project would also be subject to Mitigation Measures 6.4-la,6.4-Ib,and 6.4-le of the PEER,which require limiting construction hours to 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.except for emergency or special circumstances, muffling OCSD Headwok Replxemm Fi lSEIR 9 FSAIM1166 ATTACHMENT A , devices on construction equipment,and notifying neighboring residential areas of construction schedule. B. Findings: This Board finds that: 1. The recommended mitigation measures in the SEIR as identified above are adopted as stated in paragraph 3 of the approval resolution and will reduce noise impacts associated with project construction or operations to a less than significant level. VHI. FINDINGS CONCERNING IDENTIFIED IMPACTS THAT WERE DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT WITHOUT NEEDING TO IDENTIFY MITIGATION MEASURES The Final SEER identifies impacts that are considered to be`less than significant"not requiring mitigation measures. It is hereby determined that these environmental impacts of the project will be less than significant. AIR QUALITY A. Facts 1. The Final SEIR analyzes potential air quality impacts in Section 3.2. According to the Final SEIR,routine operation of the headworks would emit criteria pollutants. However,the estimated daily average construction emissions would not exceed the significance thresholds set by the SCAQMD. Stationary emissions from increased cogeneration and odor control facilities would be subject to SCAQMD permitting requirements and would therefore be considered less than significant. In addition, the two to three delivery track trips per week that the new headworks facilities would generate would emit a negligible amount air emissions and would not be significant. B. Findings The Board finds that: I. Project stationary source will have a less than significant impact on air quality. GEOLOGY AND SOILS A. Facts I. According to the Final SEIR,under Section 3.3,dewatering for the proposed project could create unstable soil conditions,creating risks to proposed and nearby existing structures. A geotechnical report performed by Converse Consultants recommended that groundwater be lowered at least five feet below the lowest excavation level to prevent loosening of the soils and heaving at the bottom of the excavation. Converse Consultants also performed a hydrogeologic M51)HWwod RCFlommem Fi .]SEIR 10 ESAI101165 ATrAC[UAVrr A study,which evaluated the permeability of the soils and dewatering characteristics of the site. The hydrogeologic report evaluated aquifer characteristics and provided design criteria for the dewatering system so that engineering methods can be developed to protect the stability and integrity of the existing proposed structures and avoid significant impacts to these structures. The District will implement the recommendations to minimize the risk of settlement from dewatering to ensure conformance with California Building Code standards. B. Findings The Board finds that: I. Incorporation of the design features identified in the Converse Consultants report ensure that project dewatering activity will have a less than significant impact on geology and soils. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS A. Facts 1. The proposed project would include the routine transport and storage of hazardous chemicals including ferric chloride,sodium hypochlorite,sodium hydroxide,and hydrochloric acid. The proposed project would also involve the construction of two 21,000-gallon aboveground ferric chloride storage tanks located adjacent to the main facility. 2. The Final SEER concludes that implementation of the Districts Integrated Emergency Response Program(IERP)covering worker safety, spill prevention,emergency response,and hazardous materials management at the treatment plants would ensure that no significant impacts would result from storage and use of hazardous chemicals. Therefore,no further mitigation is required. B. Findings The Board finds that: - 1. The District's existing Integrated Emergency Response Program will ensure that impacts relating to the routine transport and storage of hazardous chemicals will be less than significant. HYDROLOGY A. Facts I. The proposed project would be susceptible to potential flooding impacts. Treatment Plant No.2 is adjacent to the SAR and protected from flooding by walls and levees that were constructed by the ACOE in 1995- The Plant was recently revised by FEMA as Zone X,an area "protected from the one percent annual chance flood by levee,dike,or other structures subject to possible failure or overtopping during larger floods."The Plant is,however, located within the Prado Dam Inundation Area. In addition,the City of Huntington Beach General Plan Environmental Hazards Element indicates that the Plant is located in a Moderate Tsunami Run- Up Area. The likelihood that the Prado Dam will fail or that a tsunami large enough to inundate OCSD�aepl .Fw SM 11 6A/91168 ATTACHMPfr A the plant will occur is low. The proposed project would not increase the risks of inundation by tsunami or dam failure. Therefore,no mitigation is required for potential flooding impacts. B. Findings The Board finds that: I. The risks and impacts associated with flooding will be less than significant impact. NOISE A. Facts I. Vibration would be caused by heavy trucks,excavators,dozers,and interlocking sheet piling for shoring during excavation. The Final SEIR concludes that the groundbome noise and vibration levels would be temporary and the distances to sensitive receptors would greatly lessen groundbome noise and vibration perceived at local sensitive receptors. Therefore,this impact is considered less than significant and no mitigation is required. B. Findings The Board finds that: 1. Groundbome noise and vibration will be less than significant. TRAFFIC A. Facts I. The Final SEIR discusses potential traffic impacts in Section 3.7. The Final SEIR concludes that during periods of peak construction,the proposed project would add to traffic to local access streets during peak commute hours. During peak commute hours,new headworks facilities construction traffic will temporarily impact the Orange County freeway system and local roadways,primarily Brookhurst. However,as documented in the Final SEIR,Brookhurst St. operates at excellent level of service under existing conditions and would not be adversely impacted. The PEIR includes mitigation measure M-6.2-1,which requires the District to prepare a detailed construction schedule,notify the Cities of Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach of construction projects,and schedule construction vehicles to minimize traffic on arterial highways. Implementation of this mitigation measure requires the preparation of a traffic control plan,which will be prepared in consultation with the City of Huntington Beach Transportation Division. B. Findings The Board finds that: 1. Mitigation measure M-6.2-1 of the 1999 PEIR applies to all construction projects undertaken in conjunction with the Program. Implementation of this measure will ensure that potential short term concoction impacts are less than significant. oCSD Wad o&%R plx wntF 1SEIR 12 ESAIM1168 • ATTACHMENT A 'e A. Facts I. The Final SEIR also concludes that during operation of the project,there would be a slight increase in the routine delivery and solids haul truck trips. After completion of the project, operations would only slightly increase truck trips from Treatment Plant No. 2. Chemical deliveries would increase from four trips to five or six deliveries per day. Grit and screenings removal trips would be reduced from 490 to 310 haul trucks per year due to improved screenings compaction and larger storage/hauling containers. Operations of the new headworks facility would require about the same number of personnel as the existing headworks facility.The new headworks would not substantially increase traffic entering and leaving Treatment Plant No. 2, thercforc.no mitigation measure is required. B. Findings The Buanl finds that: I. Traffic impacts during operation of the project will be less than a significant. IX. FINDINGS CONCERNING ALTERNATIVES A. NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE Under this alternative,the District would take no action to refurbish the existing headworks. The Board finds that this alternative is infeasible and less desirable than the proposed project and rejects this alternative for the following reasons: 1. As the existing equipment aged,the possibility of sewage spills and fugitive odor releases would increase. 2. The facilities would not comply with building codes and electrical codes and could pose worker safety hazards. 3. The existing structures would continue to be located on a strike-slip fault and the risk of serious damage from an earthquake would remain high to critical headworks structures. B. 1999 PEIR ALTERNATIVE Under this alternative,the District would proceed in accordance with the program analyzcd in the PEIR, which included upgrading the existing headworks. The Board finds that this alternative is less desirable than the proposed project and rejects the alternative for the following reasons: I. As stated on page 1-1 of the Final SEIR,the District conducted a study assessing the headwork's upgrade project identified in the 1999 Strategic Plan and evaluated in the Program EIR.' The study concluded that the headworks facility was in poor condition both structurally and mechanically and that upgrading the headworks would be costly for the minimal benefit provided. Rehabilitation would require a more complex construction sequence, would disrupt Rehabilitation of Headworks C,Cost Reduction Alternative Analysis OCSD Plant No.2 Handwrite Replacement. Jab No.P2-66.Draft Report,prepared by Carollo Engineers. MSn WWwnA splwenew Mod SFM 13 WA/+Allen ATTAC' PrrA more plant operations,would have greater seismic risk,and would not provide the best available technology for performance,operation,and maintenance due to the practical limitations of the existing facilities. Furthermore,initial capital costs and present worth costs would be higher than replacement costs. Thus,rehabilitation of the headworks could not be done economically to meet the District's standards. 2. The existing headworks facilities are located directly on a strike-slip fault. An earthquake on this fault would shear and damage these structures. Although there are methods to strengthen structures against ground motion,nothing can be done to prevent shear damage in structures located directly on strike-slip faults.' Therefore,the risk of serious damage from an earthquake would remain high for these existing facilities. EnMS No.W3768674 Rchabililation of Headworks C.Cost Reduction Alternative Analysis OCSD Plant No.2 HeAworks Replarement, Job No.P2-66,Draft Report,prepared by Carollo Engineers. OCSnn worts Repimemem Fm SEat 14 ESA/tl1168 AWACR11fENTB e STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS The California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)requires the Board of Directors ("Board")to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. (Public Resources Code§21081(b); 14 Cal.Code Regs §§15043, 15093(a)). As documented in the SEB2 and explained in the Findings of Fact for the Project,the project will result in a significant and unavoidable impact on air quality during construction(Impact 3.2-1). Specifically,the project would emit nitrogen oxides(NO.) in excess of daily significance thresholds established by the SCAQMD. Therefore,the Board must identify and explain,in writing,the specific benefits of this project that outweigh the project's significant and unavoidable impact of air quality during construction.. This Board finds that the project's unavoidable impacts are acceptable in light of the project's benefits. Each benefit constitutes an overriding consideration warranting approval of the project, independent of the other benefits,despite the unavoidable construction air quality impact. 1. Safe and Reliable Wastewater Collection and Treatment The Headworks Replacement Project will enable the District to provide sanitary,sewer collection services and wastewater treatment for the projected population of the Service Area through the year 2020,protecting public health and safety. Renovation of the 40-year old facility,as included in the 1999 PEIR would not eliminate the risk of mechanical failures associated with aging equipment and structures or provide the greatest protection from seismic hazards. The existing headworks structures are located directly on a strike-slip fault. An earthquake on this fault would shear and damage these structures.' Replacement of the headworks would remove the existing critical headworks facilities from this high activity fault splay. In addition,rehabilitation of these facilities would require a more complex construction sequence that would disrupt more plant operations resulting in more construction risks than replacement of the facilities. Furthermore, the Headworks Replacement Project would provide improved preliminary treatment by adding enhanced grit and debris removal equipment,improved odor control efficiency,and would comply with the most up to date seismic codes,building codes,and electrical codes. 2. Cost Effective Solution As stated on page 1-I of the Final SEIR,the District conducted a study assessing the headworks upgrade project identified in the 1999 Strategic Plan and evaluated in the Program EIR. The study concluded that the headworks facility was in poor condition both structurally and mechanically and that upgrading the headworks would be more costly than the replacement cost for the minimal benefit that would be provided. 1 Rehabilitation of Headworks C.Cost Reduction Ahcroatin Analysis OCSD Plant No.2 Headworks Replacement. Job No.P2-66.Draft Report,prepared by Carollo Engineers. EDMS NO.0037WS75 MM Hrndw It lbxmx Final SMR I ESA/'01168 ATTACHMENT C MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ATTACHMENT C-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR HEADwORKS REPLACEMENT PROJECT ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT PROJECT AESTHETICS Impact 3.1-1:Several of the new structures would be visible from adjacent residential neighborhoods and Pacific Coast Highway(PCH). Measure(M-3.1-1)The contractor shall replace damaged landscaping and restore the construction area new the property boundary to a condition similar to existing conditions. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contract Monitor compliance with construction OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications contract specifications.Record pre and post- activities construction conditions for administrative record AIR OUALITY Impact 3.2-1:Construction of the proposed project would emit criteria pollutants. Estimated daily average construction emissions would exceed significance thresholds set by the SCAQMD. Measure(M-65-la in the PEIR)General contractors shall maintain equipment engines in proper tune and operate construction equipment so as to minimize exhaust emissions. Such equipment shall not be operated during second stage smog alerts. C-1 ATTACHMENT C.MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT PROJECT Measure(M-6.5-lb in the PEIR)During construction,trucks and vehicles in loading or unloading queues shall be kept with their engines off,when not in use,to reduce vehicle emissions. Construction activities shall be phased and scheduled to avoid emissions peaks,and discontinued during second-stage smog alerts. Measure(M-6.5.1c in the PEIR)General contractors should use reasonable and typical watering techniques to reduce fugitive dust emissions. All unpaved demolition and construction areas shall be wetted as necessary during excavation and construction,and temporary dust covers shall be used to reduce durst emissions and meet SCAQMD District Rule 403. Measure(M-6.5-Id in the PEIR)Soil binders shall be spread on site,unpaved roads,and parking areas when needed. Measure(M-65-le in the PEIR)Ground Cover shall be re-established following completion of construction activities through seeding and watering if needed. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Include air emissions restrictions and Maintain record of construction oversight for OCSD Prior to and during construction standard operating procedures for administrative record construction work in contract specifications. 2. Include dust reduction measures listed in mitigation measures in contract specifications 3. Conduct oversight ofconstmction activities to ensure scope of work is carried out. C-2 ATTACHMENT C.MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT PROJECT Measure(M-3.2-1) Soil removal contractors shall cover all trucks hauling soil,sand,and other loose materials,or maintain at least two feet of freeboard. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contract Maintain record of site inspection(i.e.truck OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications trips,coverage for administrative record) Impact 3.2-3:The proposed project is not anticipated to result in objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Measure(M-3.2-2)The District shall ensure that contractors immediately remove salvaged/demolished equipment from Plant No.2 to minimize potential odors during the removal of existing facilities. Staging areas shall not be used to store salvaged/demolished equipment. Measure(M-31-3)To ensure that the project would not emit offsite nuisance odors,the Contractor shall develop an odor mitigation plan(which could include draining and Flushing equipment prior to demolition,application of hydrogen peroxide,etc)to be approved by District's Air Quality Division. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Include in construction contract Monitor compliance with construction OCSD During construction specifications contract specifications C-3 ATTACHMENT C-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR HEADVVORKS REPLACEMENT PROJECT GEOLOGYAND SOILS Impact 3.3.1: The proposed project could expose people or smictures to potential adverse effects due to rupture of a known earthquake fault.strong ground shaking,ground failure,including liquefaction and landslides due to seismic activity. Measure(M-6.6-lb in the PEIR) Seismic Safety. The District will design and construct new facilities in accordance with District seismic standards and/or meet or exceed seismic,design standards in the most recent edition of the California Building Code. Measure(M6.6-2a in the PEIR) Spill Prevention. The District will implement The Spill Prevention Containment and Countermeasures Plan(SPCC). Measure(M6.6.2b in the PEIR) Spill Containment. OCSD chemical facilities will be designed with secondary containment,such as berms,to contain and divert toxic chemicals from wastewater flows and isolate damaged facilities to reduce contamination risks. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include design-level geotechnical Maintain record of specifications for OCSD Prior to construction activities. evaluations in specifications prior to administrative record. construction. Maintain record of specifications for OCSD Prior to construction activities. 2. Require compliance with California administrative record. Building Code in contract specifications. Maintain record of SPCC for administrative OCSD As needed. 3. Implement and update SPCC plan. record. Measure(M-3.1-1) The District shall implement the recommendations made in the geotechnical report prepared by Converse Consultants,which includes,but is not limited,To the following: C6 ATTACHMENT C-MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT PROJECT • For construction near fault splays,additional excavation and backfill with non-cohesive material on the base and sides of structures may be required. • To accommodate potential ground movement caused by seismic event,pipes with flexible coupling should be considered. • Removal and recompaction of the upper fill soils to minimize the potential for differential settlement to affect structures on gmde. • For critical structures,the use of mat foundation or reinforced perimeter footings with interior footings interconnected with grade beams for more rigidity to reduce the potential of seismically induced settlement or liquefaction. • Structures with basements should be supported on mat foundations founded on native soils or compacted fill. • Groundwater should be lowered by dewatering to at least five feet below the lowest excavation level. Existing structures should be protected during dewatering. • Temporary construction slopes should be 1.5:1 or flatter for soils below groundwater level and 1:1 or flatter for soils above groundwater level. Surcharge loads should not be permitted within five feet or a distance equal to the depth of excavation,whichever is greater, unless the excavation is properly shored. • Temporary shoring will be required where open cut excavations will not be feasible and space limitations would not allow for minimum excavation slopes or because of nearby structures. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contract Monitor compliance with construction OCSD Prior to approving final design specifications contract specifications and construction Maintain record of construction specifications, Prior to construction geotechnical evaluation,soil surveys and construction oversight for administrative record. C-5 ATTACHMENT C.MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT PROJECT HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Impact 3A-2:Contaminated soils could be encountered during underground storage tank removal or excavation for construction of the new structures. Measure(M-3.4-1) Any contaminated soils encountered on the project site during tank removal,site clearance,or excavation shall be sampled to determine the nature and extent of the contamination and disposed of off-site in accordance with applicable hazardous waste regulations,including SCAQMD Rule 1166 where soil samples reveal VOC levels in excess of 50 pans per million. The District will notify the Orange County Health Care Agency and other regulatory agencies as necessary prior to undertaking remedial actions. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contract Contractors SPCC Plan to be approved by the OCSD Prior to installation specifications District's Safely Division 2. Notify Orange County Health Can Agency Obtain approval from OCHA and other OCSD Prior to and during tank removal. and other regulatory agencies as necessary agencies if necessary. Impact 3.4-3:Structures to be demolished may contain lead paint and/or asbestos containing materials Measure(M•3.4.2) Structures to be demolished will be investigated for the presence of lead paint or asbestos containing material and proper precautions will he taken for safe removal and disposal of these materials prior to demolition activities. C-6 ATTACRMENT C.MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR READWORRS REPLACEMENT PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Include in construction contract Compliance with asbestos and lead paint OCSD Prior to demolition. specifications removal plans.Monitor removals and maintain administrative record. Impact 3A-4:Construction activities could disturb abandoned oil and gas wells and pose a potential fire or explosion hazard. Measure(M-3A-3) The District shall comply with requirements of the Division of Oil.Gas.and Geothermal Resources Construction Site Plan Review process. The Division will be notified if any previously unknown wells are discovered during the construction process. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Include in construction contract Monitor compliance with approved OCSD Prior to and during installation. specifications construction contract specifications. C-7 ATTACHMENT C.MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR HEADWORRS REPLACEMENT PROJECT HYDROLOGY Impact 3.5-1:The proposed project will temporarily modify the quality of effluent discharged to the ocean. Measure(M-3.5-1) Prior to implementation of the connection phase of the new headworks,OCSD shall have in place the means of balancing influent between the two treatment plants to avoid exceeding effluent quality discharge limits. Measure(M-3.5-2) OCSD shall include in its operating agreement with the Orange County Water District(OCWD)language stating that the SARI line may be diverted to Plant No. 1 during the 14-month headworks connection phase under a 2.0 or higher peaking factor during peak wet weather events. The agreement shall include procedures to be followed by OCSD and OCWD during peak wet weather events such that the GWRS will discontinue production of recycled water until the SARI line is removed from the source water of Reclamation Plant No. I. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1, OCSD Board of Directors and/or Joint Obtain agreement with OCWD. OCSD/OCWD Prior to Contraction Bid Approval. Agency Committee approval Impact 3.5.2:The construction of the proposed project would result in erosion and receiving water quality impacts. Measure(M-6.7-1n in the PEIR) Best Management Practices. The District will implement Best Management Practices(BMPs)as outlined in the SWMP. Measure(M-6.7-16 in the PEIR) Storm Water Management. The District will train construction and operation employees in storm water pollution prevention practices. Individual contractors performing constr clion at each treatment facility shall be required to comply with provisions of the SWMP. C-8 ATTACHMENT C.MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT PROJECT Measure(M-6.7-le in the PEIR) Storm Drain Inspection. The District will inspect and maintain all on-site storm water drains and catch basins on plant property regularly. Measure(M-6.7-Id in the PEIR) Regional Board. The District will apply the SARWQCB's recommended BMPs during construction and operation as specified in the SWMP. Measure(M-6.7-le in the PEIR) Constmclion Site Storm Water. For construction involving disturbance greater than five acres of land,the District will incorporate into contract specifications the following requirements: The District will comply with the RWQCB requirements of the NPDES General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity. The District will require that the contractor implement control measures that are consistent with the General Permit and with the recommendations and policies of the RWQCB. This would include submitting a Notice of Intent and site map to the RWQCB,developing a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan,and implementing site-specific best management practices to prevent sedimentation to surface waters. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY 1. Implement BMPs. Maintain compliance with SWMP for OCSD As needed. administrative record. 2. Implement SWMP. Maintain record of site inspections. 3. Periodically update SWMP. 4. Periodically inspect construction sites. Measure(M-6.7-2a in the PEIR) Groundwater Dewatering. Construction contractors will comply with the District's Dewatering Specifications. Measure(M-6.7-2b in the PEIR) Dewatering Discharge. Water from dewatering operations will be disposed of in a suitable manner in conformance with the NPDPS permit,as approved by RWQCB. C-9 ATTACHMENT C.MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Update dewatering procedures periodically. Maintain record of dewatering procedures for OCSD During construction. administrative record. 2. Periodically inspect construction sires. Maintain record of site inspections. NOISE Impact 3.6.1: Operations of the proposed headworks facility would generate noise. Measure(M-3.6-1) All buildings will be designed to insulate noise of the machinery such that fence-line noise standards would not be exceeded. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Include in construction contract Maintain record of construction oversight for OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications. administrative record. Measure(M-6A-2a in the PEIR)OCSD shall establish a performance noise standard for operational noise at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No.2. The performance standard shall apply to the property line of each plant and shall prohibit hourly average noise levels in excess of 55 dBA between the hours of 7:00 a.m.to 10:00 p.m.and 50 dBA between the hours of 10:00 p.m.and 7:00 a.m.,as required by the Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach Noise Ordinances. Available mitigation to achieve the performance standard consists of locating noise sources away from sensitive receptors,installation of acoustical enclosures around noise sources,installation of critical application silencers and sequential mufflers for exhaust noise, installation of louvered vents,directing vent systems away from nearby residences,and constructing sound walls at the property lines. C-10 ATTACHMENT C.MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Include compliance with local noise and Maintain record of noise complaints for OCSD On-going construction ordinances in standard administrative record. operational procedures 2. Implement raise reduction procedures when possible. 3. Consider operational noise when locating new equipment. Impact 3.6-2:The proposed project would generate noise during construction. Measure(M-3.6.2)During construction phases,the contractor shall ensure that all construction is performed in accordance with the City of Huntington Beach and Orange County noise standards. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Include in construction contract Maintain record of construction oversight for OCSD Prior to and during construction specifications administrative record Measure(M-6A.1a in the PEIR)The District's standard specifications provide construction hours of work between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM,except for emergency or special circumstances requiring that work be done during low-flow periods. C-11 ATTACHMENT C.MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT PROJECT Measure(M-6A-lb in the PEIR)All equipment used during construction shall be muffled and maintained in good operating condition. All internal combustion engine driven equipment shall be fitted with intake and exhaust mufFlers that are in good condition. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Include compliance with local noise Maintain record of construction oversight for OCSD Prior to and during construction and construction ordinances in administrative record construction specifications 2. Include noise reduction procedures in construction specifications 3. Provide construction oversight to ensure scope of work is carried out. Measure(M-6A-le in the PEER)Nearby sensitive receptors affected by construction shall be notified concerning the project timing and construction schedule,and shall be provided with a phone number to call with questions or complaints. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Prepare and distribute notifications. Maintain record of notification and OCSD Prior to construction 2. Include noise reduction procedures in distribution list. construction specifications 3. Provide construction oversight to ensure scope of work is carried out. C-12 ATTACHMENT C.MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM SEIR FOR HEADWORKS REPLACEMENT PROJECT TRAFFIC Impact 6.2-1:Periods of peak construction of the proposed project would add to traffic along local access streets. Measure(M-6.2-1 in PEIR)For each major project or construction period.the District would complete a detailed construction schedule and notify the Cities of Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach of construction. Construction vehicles shall be run on a schedule to minimize track traffic on arterial highways. IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE MONITORING AND REPORTING MONITORING MONITORING SCHEDULE ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY I. Require tmffic control plan for Ensure that construction vehicle traffic OCSD Prior to and during construction construction projects. complies with traffic control plan. 2. Notify affected cities of construction Provide record of construction oversight. schedule. 3. Provide construction oversight. EDMS No. 003768702 C-13